Municipal Ownership of Street Railways With an Analysis of the Accounts of the City of Glasgow Tramways By JAMES MARWICK, C. A., of Marwicfc, Mitchell & Co. Chartered Accountants. Reprinted from The Wall Street Journal of June 3, J905 B MUMOIPAL OWNERSHIP OF STREET RAILWAYS. With an Analysis of the Accounts of the City of Glasgow Tramways. BY JAMES MARWICK, C. A. OF MARWIOK, MITCHELL & OO. [Chartered Accountants, 79 Wall Street, New York, Chi- cago, Toledo and Minneapolis.] Whether or not municipal ownership of public utili- ties, and more particularly of street railways, has proved to be to the best interests of the communities in which they are operated, is a question to which students of f existing conditions might well prefer to withhold their answer. Economists may agree that theoretically all public utilities should be controlled by municipalities,' but they would not be likely to commit themselves to a definite statement that the public would benefit by aj transfer of street railway systems from well managed! private corporations to political parties temporarily in| control of city governments whatever their politics might! be. Eliminate the political element and establish a de- partment of street railways under a thoroughly compet- ent and permanent management, let its policy be pro- gressive, let it have command of adequate capital to expend at the right time on repairs and extensions and let no interference be permitted under any circumstance^ in the hiring or disciplining of employees. Then andi then only does it appear likely that municipal ownership! can be to the advantage of the public. These conditions exist in a large measure in the oityj of Glasgow, which is generally regarded as having de-j 2 moiistrated unequivocally that its municipal ownership has been successful. From the American progressive point of view, however, it has yet to make tremendous progress before it can be admitted to be a success in the full sense of the word. It is a success in so far as it ia making money and affording better service than that afforded by the private corporation which previously operated its system. But the private corporation was* practically restrained from making any large expendi- tures to improve the system as it was not accorded such a franchise as would assure its having an opportunity of reaping the benefit of improvements made. It was, therefore, left to the municipal government of Glasgow to replace the old horse cars with electric traction. That such a change should have resulted in a great increase in travel was only natural. Consequently,' the increase should not be attributed to the superiority of municipal management. Similar increases in patron* age were experienced in the cities of America on tho installation of cable and electric traction by private cor- porations. The lesson which should really be learned from ex- perience does not appear to be generally recognized. It is that if the citizens of a municipality are to enjoy adequate transportation facilities and service, they must either (a) grant to a private corporation long term or perpetual franchises, with the passenger fare, carrying transfer privileges fixed at a reasonable rate and the taxes restricted to some percentage which will allow fair com- pensation to the municipality for the concessions granted or (b) have their municipal government acquire and operate the system. If one of these conditions is not accepted inadequate service and constant friction is as- sured. Short term franchises and low fares will not attract the capital necessary to insure a well equippe4 and operated system. The capitalist who invests hii money in the street railroad plant has just as much rigjxt to require that his investment be absolutely secured aa the citizen has to expect him to afford reasonable trans- portation service. A wave of antagonism to granting to private cor- porations long term or perpetual franchises, even with reasonable purchase clauses included, appears to have swept over the whole country. Municipal ownership is the demand of the reformers and their numbers are ever increasing. Therefore, it appears that a thorough test of the efficiency of municipal operation cannot too soon be made in one of the larger cities. No more thorough test could be made than in Chicago. Here the street transportation conditions have for years been most un- satisfactory and inadequate and the franchises are in a legal tangle involving complications which the law courts alone can unravel. Consequently, the time would now appear ripe for the test of municipal ownership but not confiscation. The value of the properties and franchises which the corporations may be required to transfer should be adjudicated with due regard to what is fair alike to the capitalists and to the citizens. No exaggerated values should be put forward by either party in apparaising the properties whether tangible or intangible. Should the city of Chicago acquire it* street railways it will have very different conditions with which to con- tend from those which exist in Glasgow even at the present time. There the total miles of single track 're- presents only 1.35 miles per 10,000 of population as com- pared with 5.85 miles in Chicago and 7.3 miles in Pitts-; burgh. There the population only averages 189 trips per- capita annually as compared with 232 trips in Chicago and 263 trips in Pittsburgh. There the average number of passengers per mile of single track averages 1,400,000 as compared with less than 400,000 in Chicago and 360,000 in Pittsburgh. The following figures taken from the last report of the Census Bureau show the conditions in six of. the largest cities of America, compared with those of Glas- gow for the year ending May 31, 1904. Track Miles / Passenfrerg Per , Per Milea Mile 10,000 of Car Inhab- of Car Pop- City Population. Track. Mileage, itant. Track. Mile, illation. Glasgow.... 1,000,000 185.00 16.291,082 189 1,400.000 11.6 1.85 Chicago 1,769.951 1,086.24 102,866,407 989 895,985 4.0 ittsburgh.. 640,880 469.4T 84,811,111 963 869,197 4.9 783 New York.. 8,548.996 1,299.10 180,499,586 966 726,416 5.9 8.66 Philadelphia 1,293,697 517.58 61,175,495 956 640,165 5.4 4.00 Boston 997,994 461.68 47,524,794 248 605,179 4.8 487 Kansas City. 937,042 181.24 15,979,864 941 815,817 8.6 7'.66 The contrast in the mileage figures contained In this statement is remarkable as it indicates the existence of a condition in Glasgow with its million of population which is in direct contradiction to the policy of munici- palities in America as also to one of the fundamental principles of rapid transit. Did such a condition exist in an American city it would not be tolerated, but such an outcry would be raised against the company in control of the franchise as would force it to change its policy. In making a success from a money point of view, the mundcap