.;^'.-;' y. '. 2923 /d6*f S^C6 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE TERCEITEIARY : A EETEOSPECT. BY ja: es cox, Jun., MAYOR OF STRATFORU-aN-AVON, LONDON : OASSELL, PETTER, AND GAL PIN, LA BELLE SAUVAGE YAED, LUDGATE HILL, E.C. 1865. LOS DON: CASSELL, PETTEE, AKD GALPIN, BELLE SATJVAGE 'WCBRKS, LONDON, E.C. ?K THE TERCENTENARY A RETROSPECT. Now that tlie three liundi-edth anniversary of the birthday of our great National Poet has passed away, and become numbered among the things that have been, it is pei'haps not unfitting to take a look at it from our present position. We may now be able to make some estimate and judgment of it as a whole, without being confused by mere adjuncts and minor details. The sanguine expectations and bright hopes with which some ol us anticipated its arrival have given place to feelings very much akin to disappointment. What was to have been a great success and brilliant ev-ent, has been, at least partially, a failure. The hopes that were entertained of it have not been realised, and the question must often have been asked, Why is this 1 What are the reasons that so much labour, exertion, and energy were productive of so little result 1 It appears perfectly natural that the event sho\dd be specially marked, that it should be a sort of red-letter day in our history. Cynics, and those whom age, if it has rendered more wise, has in many cases made more cold-hearted, may object that there was no reason why this particular anniversary of our great Poet's birth should be specially honoured ; that it was in reality no more important than the two hundred and ninety-ninth or the three hundred and first ; but it is sufficient argument for our purpose that the great bulk of mankind think differently, and that it is the universal practice to take special note of commemorations marked by these great divisions of time. We find different sections of religionists celebrating their centenaries and bicentenaries, and meeting to congratulate themselves upon the a2 spread of their peculiar views, aud to talk over and review the effect they have had upon mankind. What more reasonable than that the disciples of Shakespeare — who taught not peculiar views and exceptional opinioiis, but who has held aloft before the world universal truth, and illustrated and enforced those eternal principles of right and justice, whose foundation is laid deep in every human breast — should, after the lapse of thi*ee centui-ies, deem it not unfitting to try to make some little estimate of the benefits Shakespeare had conferred upon the world, and to mai-k their appreciation of such benefits by paying some tribute to the memory of the great genius to whom mankind is so largely indebted 1 We will go further : as loving chil- dren would gather round their father on the jubilee of his birth, and would delight to say how hale and strong he was, although the hoar of fifty winters had gathered around his reverend head, so it was impossible but that he who had attracted to himself such an amount of what vfe may safely call filial affection, should on this occasion have his children gathering round his feet in all the impulsiveness, and ardoiu", and fulness of love, there to say, " Time works no change in thee, unless, indeed, it be to make thy name greater and thy fame more glorious." Such being the case, it mattei's little whether we can point to this or that man as being the one w-ho first advocated a special celebration of this event. It could not be otherwise than specially marked. The Tercentenary Festival was, in fact, a necessity. If it can be shown that the three hundredth anniversary of the great Poet's birth would of necessity be a day singled out from all other preceding anniversai'ies for especial honour, it will be easy to show that Stratford-on-Avon — " the birth-place, the home, and the grave of the bard" — was the necessary centre of any movement or festival having for its object the rendering of honour to the world's poet, to England's greatest son, but still to Stratford's darling child. To this spot would all loving eyes be turned, all loving hearts impelled ; hither would the pilgrim bend his step, as he had ever done, to the sacred shrine of poesy and song — here in the very heart of England, in the very centre of " this precious stone set in the silver sea." How any men who lay claim to possess ordinary intelligence. much less to be endowed with, some degree of genius, poetic feeling, and sentiment, could ever be brought to believe that the noisy, bustling, busy, crowded city was the place where a national monu- ment should be erected to him who was so pre-eminently the child of the fields, and the woods, and the river- side j who was born, and cradled, and reared to manhood amid scenes of country life ; who gained his lofty inspirations in the meadows among the wild flowers by the side of the " soft-flowing Avon ;" who, if he wrote of men, and cities, and human passions, of courts, and palaces, and the fierce battle-field, yet ever delighted to linger, ay, to revel and roam, wild and free, among those scenes of his childhood, youth, and manhood, where Nature had whispered to him her choicest, rarest, noblest thoughts, and where, ere yet his manly strength declined, he chose to come and dwell, and spend the remainder of his days, that when evening came he might be sweetly hushed to sleep in his native home, close by his placid, quiet, peaceful Avon ; — how any men could beHeve that any other place in the world was a fitting one for a nation's tribute to his memory, is a mystery. Surely, if amongst Nature's children sufficient enthusiasm and ardent love should be excited to raise a monument to Nature's darling child, it was necessary that it should be among the scenes of Nature that he so dearly loved, and fi'om which he decreed his very bones and dust should not be severed. Such being the case, it may be asked. Why was the demonstration comparatively so small ? and why productive of so little result 1 Is not Shakespeare loved 1 Have we, in the nineteenth century, not learned to appreciate him yet 1 Does he hold the place in our hearts to which he is entitled 1 or have we no room for him 1 Are we so taken up with money-making and shop-keeping, and railroads and steam-engines, and whirl and excitement, with business on the one hand and vanity on the other, that for him, who to this England is worth more and should be greater than all these things, we have no room in our hearts 1 Let other nations admire him — the countrymen of Schiller, and Goethe, and Dante — let them bow before his mighty genius, and we feel proud of the tribute to one of our own country and our own blood. Of him it may be tnily said, and we speak it reverently, " His fame is gone out into all lands, and his words unto tlie ends of the world ;" and they come from the East and the "West, and the Nortli and the South, to show their love and admiration for his memory, while we in England — shame upon us! — cannot stop our vast machinery for money-making one moment — cannot elevate our souls a little above the sordid, mean spirit of the age, even for a day, that we may show the world how England reveres her Shake- speare. And here it must be admitted, as a matter of great regret, that those gentlemen upon whom devolved the responsibility and labour of carrying out the details of the celebration — upon whom rested the necessity of guiding and directing what ought to have been the greatest demonstration of our time, fell short of what was i-equired of them. They suffered themselves to be influenced by the utilitarian spirit which is so universal amongst us, and decided that nothing should be done to honour the great bard that had not for its end and object something that should be of benefit to us or our children. Hence the scheme for the endowment of a scholarship at the Uni- versity ; while, unfortunately for them, and unfortunately for the movement generally, those gentlemen who had fixed upon the wi'ong jilace for the national tribute, seized the opportunity which presented itself, and fixed upon the right thing to do, and the only thing which was likely to command any general and great amount of support — viz., the erection of a monument ; a work of art simply and solely for the expression of a nation's love and admiration of him to whom she owed so much. So here we were at the commencement, Stratford attempting to do the wi'ong thing in the right place, and London attempting the right thing in the "WTong place. Perhaps it is wi'ong to say Stratford, for at a very early period of the proceedings she awoke to a proper sense of her position and duty. Although at a county meeting it was determined by the smallest possible majority that the erection of a national monument should form no part of the programme, the inhabitants prayed the Mayor to convene a town's meeting, at which it was decided by an over- Avhelming majority, indeed all but unanimously, " That no scheme for the celebration could be considered at all perfect that did not embrace, as its most prominent feature, the erection of a monument to Shakespeare in his native town." The public mind had, however, become mystified, a division of feeling created, and although the monument scheme was adopted by the Stratford Committee, a London Tercentenary Committee, arrogating to itself the title of National, was formed, and a great portion of the London press was induced to aid it by its powerful advocacy. Thus there were two committees in the field, one backed by men of considerable literary ability, having a knowledge of. the working of such matters, assisted by contributors to the London papers, aided by all the talent and wealth which could be brought to bear upon it in the great metropolis, and using for itself all that self- interest which London knows how to exert so well to make herself the one great centre point of attraction in the kingdom. This committee managed, by great efforts, to gather around itself a host of eminent names — many names, indeed, of which we may well be proud ; but later on, when the subject began to be more ventilated, and the claims of Stratford to be more generally admitted, it declined in public favour, and we all know its end. Is it not written in the book of the chronicles of the time, " It attempted to do the right thing, but in the wrong place, and it failed?" On the other hand, we had a committee in a small county town, embracing, indeed, among its members many good, able, and worthy men, but composed, for the most part, of those who were utterly unused to such matters, and who could ill afford the time that was necessary to be devoted to them in order that success might be attained. We have seen that it was un- fortunate that this committee did not get a fair start, and it is equally unfortunate that, from a desire to conciliate, it was hampered with the two or three objects which appeared in its programme, instead of having one thing only, which should engage the interest of the public, and to which they should be invited to contribute. The School, the Monument, and the Festival Fund were unfortunate divisions, but, after they had once been adopted, it was found impossible to drop either of them. Whatever might have been the opinion at first, it is now generally admitted that the erection of a monumental memorial was the one thing the committee sho\ild have striven for, as it was the 8 only part of their programme which commanded any great amount of popular support. It is reasonable to suppose that any committee, no matter how composed, aiming at a great national demonstration in honour of the foremost man of all times, would make many mistakes ; and certainly the Stratford-on-Avon Tercentenary Committee, composed as it was I)rincipally of men whose time was almost wholly occupied with their ordinary business, might naturally be expected to fall into many errors. With the very best intentions, it could scarcely be avoided. On the committee there were, of course, great differences of opinion ; but, upon the whole, the members held well together, and worked in earnest for the common object, disinterestedly striving that, as far as in them lay, it should be a celebration worthy of the occasion. If there was one name more prominently before the public than others in connection with it — if one man devoted more of his time and enei-gies to it than others could do, it was almost a necessity ; and the worthy IMayor of the borough must often have felt how desirable it would have been if other members of the committee had been equally at liberty to take active service in the cause, by visiting other towns and advocating the claims of Stratford upon the public. The IMayor must have felt it to be unfortunate that, at a time when the people were so jealous of any attempt to make personal glory or popularity out of such a celebration — when the publications of the day were satirising the members of the London Committee for en- deavouring to reap honour for themselves by writing their own little names by the side of the great name of Shakespeare — that his name was so continually before the public in connection with it. To those, indeed, who knew the necessity of the case, and who knew how dis- interestedly the Mayor was working, and bringing all his great energy and determined, persevering, unremitting endeavours to bear upon it, almost night and day for months, it would be seen in its true light; but to the great world around us, it perhaps looked a little too much like the committee of one man. It should be no reproach to the Mayor that he was unable to do that which it would have taken, perhaps, half a dozen men effectually to accomplish. If the local committee had possessed among its members one man of great literary eminence and acquirements, both able and willing to take the initiative, having the 2)restige of a great name, and withal an enthusiast in the cause, more might undoubtedly have been effected. It was most desirable, too, that for what professed to be a national celebration and undertaking, the sanction of Royalty should have been obtained. If the committee had been fortunate enough at the outset to get this, it would have gone far to have made it a complete success. The London Committee, however, standing in the way, it was thought impolitic to make any direct application for this most neces- sary sanction and patronage. The petition later on to H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, asking him to lay the foundation of the National Monument, was, perhaps, premature, as there were not sufficient funds in hand to make the carrying out of the project a positive certainty; but even then, if the committee had been so fortunate as to have obtained the direct and immediate recognition of His Royal Highness, by getting his consent to lay the first stone of the memorial, on the three hundredth anniversary of the birthday of our great Poet, it would have made the completion of the work a certainty. It would have given renewed spirit to the committee and its friends ; it would have decided those who had been hesitating between the two rival committees, and it would have put fresh life into the timorous and lukewarm. In making these remarks, however, one cannot but feel that, in the very courteous reply which was directed to be forwarded to the committee. His Royal Highness only acted with proper and almost necessary caution. In the meantime many difficulties had to be contended against. It was so impossible to know what the country generally wished or expected to be done ; some suggesting one thing and some another ; Bome thinking too much could not be attempted, and others thinking we had better be contented with smaller things. The Stratford Committee, however, knew that it ought to be a great national celebration, and that on them devolved the responsibility of providing for it. They, therefore, committed themselves to the task, trusting to the generous right-feeling of the English people; and who can say they did too much ? They had hoped, indeed, that the 10 proceeds of the festival would have left a balance in hand to have been applied to the pei'manent objects which they had in view, instead of leaving them with a heavy deficit to provide for, and which would not have been the case if the country had rallied round them as they had every reason to hope and expect. But they have, at least, this satisfaction, that, whatever others did, they, at least, did, or tried to do, their duty. It is not the intention of the writer to recount the many and very trying difficulties which continually beset the com- mittee in carrying out the details of the celebration. These things have been mostly before the public, although the public can never fully appreciate the anxiety, and care, and extra work which they brought with them. What the committee were able to accomplish in the face of these difficulties is also known. The grand pavilion, with its splendid banquet and brilliant spectacles, is matter of history. The imposing assembly, the telling speeches, the thrilling concerts, and magnificent theatrical representations have been duly chronicled. The drop- scene has fallen upon what should have been — upon what might have been — a glorious and successful national festival, but for the apathy and indifierence of the English people, the unfortunate division of opinion at the outset, the jealousies and petty personalities introduced, the want of high authorities' sanction and patronage, and the unavoidable mis- takes which the local committee unwittingly made, and which should have been generously overlooked by that England who has been able and proud to erect monuments to her soldiers, and statesmen, and kings, but who, during three long centuries, has not had the soul to raise a fitting tribute to him of whom we should be pi'ouder than all. The question now is, " Shall matters so end 1 " It is this considera- tion which has prompted the writer to address the public on the subject. Some will no doubt say they have had enough and heard enough of the Tercentenary, and that it is foolish again to bring it forward. Some may even insinuate that this is another attempt to gain fame or popularity out of the occasion. This pamphlet will, however, sufficiently show that literary fame is, at any rate, out of the question. It never would have been written at all, but from an honest conviction that, for the credit of England, and espe- 11 cially for the credit of this county of Warwick, matters should not eud where they are. If there had been no attempt at a national demonsti'ation, if there had been no attempt to erect a national monument, the case would be different ; but for England, or for a considerable number of Englishmen, to have tried to do this and failed, hopelessly and entirely, is what ought not to be, and will be recorded in history as a disgrace to our time. The pecu- niary loss attendant uf)on tbe celebration at Stratford is a very small matter in comparison with this. The committee have provided for the one, but they cannot for the other. It is for the public to say whether, having paid dearly for trusting too much to the generosity of the people of England, they shall have the additional mortifi- cation of not being able to raise some permanent memorial of the event. Let it not be said that Stratford wants, or ever did want, to gain any advantage to hei'self out of it. This cry has been continually raised, while other towns were doingthe very same thing, instead of nobly and ungrudgingly giving their aid where it was so much needed. We were told, indeed, "Let Stratford have its demonstration, by all means : it is, no doubt, the proper place for festivity and rejoicing on the occasion ; let it have the labour, and work, and expense attendant upon all this — the country will expect as much ; but if there is to be a monument erected, it must be in London ; if any enduring record of the event, it must be elsewhere." Well, Stratford did what she was asked to do cheerfully and willingly. She invited the world to come and rejoice with her, and provided amply for her guests. The most and the worst that can be said of her is, that she did too much, and this while she was all along pained to see the utter selfishness with which other towns, whose support she had calculated upon, were only bent upon making some- thing for themselves out of the occasion. Shall it be recorded that, while the little town of Stratfoi-d was spending her thousands and exhausting her resources to show to the world that she, at least, would not shrink from doing the work that was required of her, she was denied the support and assistance that she wanted to enable her to do that which she had promised herself — 12 viz., the building a monumental memorial, which should be, in some degree, worthy of her noble son 1 The committee have in their hands the nucleus of a fund for this purpose, and other amounts are ready to be added if there is any pro- bability of the project being carried out. Surely there is suiScient warm-heartedness in the people of England to prevent its being abandoned altogether 1 A very little effort even on the part of this county of Warwick, including the great and usually liberal and generous town of Birmingham, would accomplish the object. The writer will be glad to receive assurances of support from any who may be disposed to give their assistance. He is not vain enough to think that he can do that which others of greater ability failed to accomplish, or that he can contribute in any very important degree to a suc- cessful result. Although he makes this appeal entirely on his own responsibility, it is not that he desires any notoriety for himself, but simply because he will continue to have faith in the good feeling and generosity of the English public, even in spite of the temptation to the contrary which would sometimes cross the mind. CAS3ELL, PETTER, AND GALPIN, BELLE SAUVAGE WORKS, LONDON, S.C. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY Los Angeles This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. L9-50m-4,'61 (B8994s4)444 THE Ll^KAtt^X :rsity of cj^:i.iFaRNu ~ "^ ANGELES AA 000 369 47 '^r'^f^^im^^m^