Dillon County Economic and Social EDGAR T. THOMPSON DEWEY STEPHENS University of South Carolina Dillon County Federation of Women's Clubs June 1922 Bulletin University of South Carolina— Issued Monthly No. no, June 1922. Second Class Mail Matter »« t» W ..#«*»«*#«»»»*».»».«».>» .••••••••■•#>«#«*«»««*««..»>*9m ••■• ■*»••« ..ejf»,»0».f.»#».»wt M f«>>».t M tl.0 H » M tl»» M #»«t. The Bank of Little Rock Little Rock, South Carolina in money matters is at your command. ? Our time, service, advice and experience f ? * ? f f Your account, protected by our ample re- sources, will receive every consideration and attention. We invite the accounts of those who are desirous of forming a strong, helpful banking i i connection. 1 I We Invite Your Business 1 i s ? T. C. SHERWOOD, J. H. MEADOWS, President Cashier L. A. MANNING, Vice-President »*#*>»»a»»#»»» M » M >>«»>i#*>#>»»-#*»»*4*«»**>**» " »**»»»»»»»**»**»"»«M»« .».*»« .»..»»»»>.»^»««..# •■••••••••»#••«•• ^ /^/^' "No Account Too Large To Handle, I No Account Too Small To Serve" Ser^^cI -o 4^ CAPITAL $75,000 SURPLUS $75,000 The Bank of Dillon Dillon, S. C. i ! W. H. MULLER. JOHN C. BETHEA, | President Vice-President i J. M. SPRUNT, DR. WADE STACKHOUSE, j Cashier Vice-President ? R. L. MOODY, { Asst. Cashier | •••-•"••••"•••♦•••••••••-•••••••"•-•••«-•"•-•-• •»•'»■■»■'•••» i»ii« i«i tii«ii«i'»ii»i «ii»i'y I The Bank of Latta 1 W. H. SMITH, President L. A. MANNING, Jr., Vice-President M. M. SELLERS, Cashier E. C. ALLEN. Vice-Prcident Latta, S. C. A Good Bank in a Good Town Offers to You Safety and Service "BANK WITH US" ! •• • »••• ».*»«»».«».»»«»—»»«»'■»»'»»•••»»»•♦"•'•• " ♦''• " •'■» ■ •»''>**♦"♦**>**•**♦**• " •*■• " • " • " • " •■«• " ••'• " • " •■■•■■•■■•■■•■'•♦ ».»■.<..»..»..»..»..»..». .«..»..»..»»*«..«..»..««»»««#«^-..»»*»»».* ^ «*»*^»^ »*♦■*♦"»..» » <..♦ ^♦.^.^ *.»»♦-.»» i The Peoples Bank j I "The Home for Savings" f } Dillon, S. C. I Capital and Surplus $74,500 ? Gives Efficient, Courteous and Prompt Service We Solicit Your Patronage i T. A. DILLON, Pres. F. B. DAVID, Cashier t V. L. McLEAN, Vice-Pres. T. W. HAMER, Asst. Cashier Phone 16 : - ? Farmers & Merchants Bank i Head Office, Marion, S. C. Latta, South Carolina \ Solicits the accounts of Individuals, Firms r and Corporations The Strongest Bank in Dillon County I Capital $100,000 Surplus $125,000 "Make This Bank Your Business Home" J W. H. CROSS, Pres. W. D. BETHEA, Asst. Cashier I I H. A. BETHEA. Vice-Pres. } r i i DILLON COUNTY Economic and Social EDGAR T. THOMPSON DEWEY STEPHENS A Laboratory Study in the Department of Rural Social Science of the University of South Carolina MAY 1922 « J rf > 1 I. * tc * t » 4 % 4 C 1 , * * t «J *^ » « < C ( c _ t » t •■ * 1 I. i i i * * 1 CI » •^ * • < * * * * ' ♦ * • * 4 «. * « t * * * ' \0^ TABLE OF CONTENTS Pag" Foreword ^ I. Historical Background II. Dillon County Towns 34 Dillon — Latta — ■Lake View — Little Rock. III. Natural Resources and Industries 23 Geography — Timber — Mineral Deposits — Soils — Cli- mate — Industries. IV. Facts About the Folks 28 Population Increases — Illiteracy — A Big Church Prob- lem — Vital Statistics — Marriages — Population Fig- ures — Negro Ownership of Farms — Table. V. Wealth and Taxation 32 l2 Agricultural Wealth — Total Wealth — Farm Mort- «5 gages — Banks and Banking Resources — Liberty Loans — Automobiles — Roads and Railways — Tax- ation — Table. ^ VI. Schools 41 3 Ten Year Gains — Attendance — Teachers — Consolida- tion — Rank of Dillon County Schools — Negro Edu- cation — Table. cv, VII. Dillon Agriculture 49 • Dillon County Predominantly Agricultural — Idle C\| Lands — Farm Tenancy — Size of Farms — Drainage — g Cotton and the Boll Weevil Problem — Tobacco — •^ Corn — Sweet Potatoes — Our Livestock Situation — Machinery on the Farm — Farm Loan Associations — Table. d VIII. Balance Sheet in Food and Feed Production Gl Our Deficiency — The Shortage in Detail — Reasons for ^ Shortage — The Boll Wee'vil Would Starve on Corn — Q The Local Market Problem — Co-operative Marketing — CO "Sugar Spuds" — What the Banks Can Do — Standardiz- uj ing the Product — Table. 5 IX. Evidences of Progress 71 ^ Educational Advances — Our Towns — Wealth — Agri- culture — Dillon County Fair — County Federation of Women's Clubs — Public Health Work — Home Demon- stration Activities — Farm Demonstration Work — Transportation — Table. X. Our Problems and Their Solution SO A County-Wide Chamber of Commerce — Farm Ten- ancy — Poor School Attendance — Illiteracy — An Ill- balanced Farm System — Tax Reform — Co-operative Movements — Libraries. 449625 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For the publication of this booklet, thanks are due to those public spirittHl men and women of Dillon County who by liberal advertisements and contributions made possible this work. We are certain tiiat the citizens of this county whom this bulletin is trying to serve, and this includes all of the citizens of the county, will extend to these advertisers their heartiest support. To Dr. J. H. David, Mr. Houston Manning. Mr. L. A. Manning, Mrs. R. P. Hamer, Mr. J. S. Thompson and to the Dillon County Federation of Women's Clubs, we are grateful for generous contributions. We are also under obligations to Mr. W. C. McCall, a Florence County student at the University, for aid in soliciting advertise- ments. In the chapter on Dillon County Towns the write-up of Little Rock was prepared by Mr. C. V. Hayes, Lake View by Mr. J. E. Haukius, a student at the University, and Dillon by Mr. W. J. Carter and Mr. A. B. Jordan. There is little in this study that is original except as far as arrangement and interpretation is concerned. The psychologist James says a genius is a man who can stick in his bill anywhere and draw out what the occasion demands. In this we hope we have imitated genius. The work owes much to the help of Dr. Wilson Gee, head of the Department of Rural Social Science. We are greatly indebted to him for his suggestions, encouragement and criticisms all along the course of its preparation. EDGAR T. THOMPSON, DEWEY STEPHENS. University of South Carolina, May, 1022. JAMEvS W. DILLON FOREWORD Wilson Gee. Professor of Rural Social Science , University of South Carolina : In point of fact the territory of Dillon County is as old as almost any of the coastal plain region of South Carolina. But Dillon County as a political unit dates back only to 1010 and is the forty-third county formed in the State. A kind Providence had smiled on Dillon in the lot that has Ueeu aw Uecisioii was ever made l)y tlial body relative to the legality of the election for the proposed uew county of Dillon, but a decision made ill tlie similar case of Lee County was so adverse to the conten- tions of new county supporters that the case for Dillon was dr(jpi»t'(l. Another election was held on January 10, 11J02, and again there w-as an exciting contest which resulted in another defeat for the new county which lacked only one hundred and thirty votes of having the required majority. Before the forth election there was a great deal of eontention regarding the question of territory. Old county sup- porters did not believe that the proposed new county coutaintHl four hundred square miles. Much time was spent in wrangling over this issue which has since been proven foolish iov the United States Census of 1920, gives Dillon County 471 square miles and Marion County ii'2\) s a a o CI r-l ^ o «i t—t c: CI' a a> rH iH HH O 03 .— » .— ' be a re re Avera perso re O re O Value of the annua 1 Product. Boxes, Baskets ... $400 Confectionery . . . 500 Electricity 56,000 Fertilizers 30,000 Flour and Grist.. 100,025 Ice 10,000 Lumber and Tim- ber Products . . 65,000 Minerals & Soda . 300 Printing & Publish- ing 4,500 Textiles 1,218,751 Oil Mills 130,000 Total $1,010,370 $5,000 115,000 3,000 0,000 744,351 00,000 $1,500 2,000 27,000 44,885 302,800 27,000 85,000 (:;oo 34,853 1,000,000 431,8.50 $1,000 $301,800 80.150 0,000 8,000 300,000 231,040 4,850 1 2 13 15 6 4 53 S 20,853 9 1,210,000 407 100.010 35 $0:;3,351 $2,557,548 $720,090 $1,743,473 550 IV. FACTS ABOUT THE FOLKS Dewey Stephens This chapter is an attempt to weigh the most important facts available concerning the folks themselves, constituting the popu- lation of Dillon County. The new census report on population has just been published and this enables us to give data that are practically as they exist at the present time. The attention of the reader is directed to the table at the end of this chapter where the statistics on which this discussion is based are to be found in compact form for ready reference. Population Increase. The population of Dillon County in 1!»20 was 2.5,278. In 1910 the population was 22,015. The increase was 2,603 or 11.7 per cent during the last ten years. In 1910 the population was 48 to the square mile while in 1920 it was 53.7. Dillon County ranks 11th in den- sity of rural population. The 1920 census shows that there are 12,180 native whites, and 12,930 negroes in the county. Tliese figures indicate that the negroes outnumbered the native whites by 7-50. Or in other words, .51 per cent of the total population is negro. By comparing the ceu.sus figures of 1910 and 1920, we find that the white and negro popula- tion have increased in the same ratio during the last ten years. Dillon is the largest town in the county, with a population of 2,205 in 1920. The ix)pulation for 1910 was 1,757. The increase during the past decade was 448 or approximately 25 per cent. Latta is the second largest town in the county, with a popula- tion of 1,079 in 1920. The population for 1910 was 1,358. The decrease during the past decade was 279 individuals or 20 per cent. Lakeview is the tliird largest town in the county with a popu- lation of 306 in 1920. The population for 1910 was 157 indicating an increa.se of 149 during the past decade or 94.9 per cent. Illiteracy. Eleven people out of every hundred of our white iwpulation above ten years of age are unable to read and write their own names, according to the 1920 census. In other words fliey are Dillon County: Economic and Social 29 slieer illiterates. Forty-two founties have a smaller per cent of illiteracy than Dillon County. When we look at the number of native white illiterate voters we have a condition which is more serious; for how can a man or woman vote intelligently when he or she cannot read and make out a ballot. Approximately thirteen males out of every hundred are in this condition and 14.5 per cent of the females. There are forty-one counties that have a smaller percentage of male illiterate voters than Dillon and forty-two that have a smaller percentage of female illiterate voters than Dillon. About one out of every three negroes in Dillon County cannot read and write. To be specific 33.1 per cent of the negro population above ten years of age are illiterate. Very effective work is being done by the State Illiteracy Com- mission and the State Department of Education to remove illit- eracy. The 1920 report of the work shows an enrollment of 310 white people in adult schools iu Dillon County, \vith an average attendance of 203. Forty-eight of these had perfect attendance. Seventy-four were taught to read and one hundred and eleven were taught to write. Illiteracy will meet its final death at the hands of the com- pulsory attendance law if it is effectively enforced. It is the duty of every loyal citizen to do everything in his or her power to see that the law is properly enforced. A Big Church Problem. The fact that Dillon County ranks 40th in church membershii) with only GO per cent of the population above ten years of ag.*^ members of the church speaks very poorly for the churches of the county. The state average is 74 i>er cent. We are making great progress along lines of education, but the churches do not seem to be keeping up with the progress made along other lines. It is time for the faithful supporters of the church to get busy a' d try to do something before the problem is too greatly complicated through delay. Illiteracy is one of the evils with which the cluirch must con- tend; for an illiterate is very sensitive. Few of them take an active part in church work. We cannot expect them to be actively interested in the affairs or the church unless they are given some- thing to do, and are prepared to accomplish the task. Farm tenancy and poor roads are responsible for part of the existing conditions. Then there are the poorly paid pastors. This means that the besfpastors will be in the towns and cities, where the 30 Dillon County: Economic and Social salaries are more attractive. Unless the church wakes up and tries to remedy some of the existing evils they ai"e going to put an end to the church. It is time for the church to wake up and .show to the world the real way towards its betterment socially and econ- omically. Vital Statistics. It is very gratifying to note that there are lO.G more people per thousand of population born in Dillon County each year than die during the same periole as a whole. This is better sho\rn by giving the per captia wealth in the county. In 1020 in Dillon County this item was $5G0, still using the State Tax Commission's figures, making us rank 26th among the counties of the state. While we outrank twenty counties in the matter of per capita wealth, we should not be satisified with our standing. With our rich soils especially adapted to the cultivation of a wide variety of crops we should rank among the first. It is intere.sting to note that our neighborhood county of Marlboro ranks 10th with a per capita wealth of $728. It should be borne in mind that the wealth retaining capacities of a people count far more than the wealth getting activities. Farm Mortgages. The total number of farms in Dillon County im 1010 was 2,659. Of these 100 or 4 per cent were mortgaged. Four counties. Beaufort, Berkeley, Marlboro and Charleston outranked us in having a smaller percentage of mortgaged farms. The white farmers of the county owned 2,543 of these farms. There were 00 or 3.5 per cent of them under mortgage. The coun- ties of Beaufort. Charleston and Marlboro were the only counties having fewer white farm mortgages than Dillon County. Negro farmers owned 116 farms and 10 or 16.4 per cent were mortgaged. Twelve counties outranked us in this particular. According to the 1020 census there were 3,440 farms in Dillon County in that year. Of these 117 or 3.4 per cent were mortgaged. Three counties, Allendale, Calhoun and Marlboro had a smaller percentage than Dillon County. In 1010 the value of all mortgaged farm lands and buildings in the county was $461,655. The total amount of the mortgage debt was $93,455, or 20.2 per cent of the total value of the farm land and buildings. In 1020 this property was valued at $056,675 of which $262,422 or 27.4 per cent, was under mortgage. From these figures we see that while the percentage of farms under mortgage fell from 4 per cent to 3.4 per cent over the period of ten years, the total mortgage debt rose from 20.2 per cent to 27.4 per cent of the total value of all farm land and buildings during the same time. A mortgage is not necessarily a bad thing. When used for making improvements a mortgage may be made with profit. But if a mortgage is given for the purpose of buying luxuries, such as 34 Dillon County: Economic and Social automobiles for pleasure driviug, there is nothing gained in mak- ing one. Banks and Banking Resources. In 1920 Dillon County had one National and six State Banks, or one bank for every 3,135 people. In this respect we rank 13th among the counties of the state. Two banks have been added since. In 1919 our total banking resources were $3,088,793.47 which was an increase of $1,942,775.04, or 1G9 per cent, over 1914. The average increase for the state as a whole during the same period was 140 per cent. Comparing loans and discounts during the same five year period we have an increase of $722,587.79 over 1914 bringing the total to $1,050,412.67 for 1919 which represents an increase of 77 per cent. The average increase for the state during the same period was 100 per cent. The increase in capital stock was not so marked. There was an increase of only $50,000 over 1914 bringing the total to $270,700 or an increase of 22 per cent. This means that an increase of 1G9 per cent in resources was effected on an increase of only 22 per cent in capital stock. These increases are not entirely the result of an increasing population for the population increased 11.8 per cent from 1910 to 1920. It is lai'gely the result of increased thrift on the part of the people and was accomplished during an abnormal business period. Our per capita bank resources in 1914 were $55 which was increased to 3=122 in 1919. In per capita loans the increase was very much less, from $41 in 1914 to $65 in 1919. Our per capita capital stock in 1919 was only $10.70 which was an increase of just one dollar over 1914. Liberty Loans. Dillon County's total quota for all the Liberty Bond drives exclusive of the first was $1,088,500. The total amount subscribed to these loans was $1,145,250 and 1,900 people made subscriptions. The county ranked 16th in the percentage of the quota sub- scribed with 105.2 per cent. Dui'ing the First Liberty Loan drive in June 1917, there was no organization for soliciting subscriptions and advertising the loan in Dillon County. Consequently the county failed to reach its allotment. The town of Dillon with a quota of $25,000, subscribe{itta, Lakeview, Nichols, Dun- bar and Ilamer. A county road connects Latta and Brownsville and another connects Latta and Dunbar. We are well supplied with roads but we have been very lax in keeping them up. The Calhoun Highway passes into Dillon County by way of Hamer from Lumberton, North Carolina. It describes a great arc across the northern part of the state taking in the towns of Dillon, Bennettsville, Chesterfield, Lancaster, Chester, Clinton, Greenwood, Abbeville and thence to Athens, Georgia. Two State Highway projects were begun and one carried to completion in Dillon County in 1921. Project 50 A from Dillon to the Marion County line is a gravel sand and clay road and is 8.25 miles long. Its construction cost $50,608.90 for which Fed- eral aid to the amount of $17,403.15 was obtained. Project 50 BC is a sand clay road and extends from Dillon to the Marlboro County line. It is 11.52 miles long. By the end of 1921 it was only 60 per cent completed and at that time it had cost $23,551.28 for which a federal aid of $8,265.67 had been obtained. Dillon County has now 19.2 miles of improved soft surface roads in the State Highway System and the construction of 17.4 ad- ditional mileage is recommended at an estimated cost of $17,000. In 1921, $8,836.52 accrued to the county from motor vehicle licenses. This was an increase of $1,103.90 over 1920. While there remains much to be done in the development of good roads in the county, it can be said that our roads are in better condition and are being used more now than at any other time in our history, both as a county and as a part of old Marion County. And this not due alone to an increase in population. Between 100 and 500 vehicles pass over every mile of Dillon County roads every day. It is hardly necessary to offer arguments in favor of good roads, they are so apparent. Roads are the very arteries of the state and the nation and for this reason they should be kept at their highest point of efficiency. With bad roads traffic is congested, transportation is expensive, and the people suffer. It has been proven that money invested in good roads is repaid many times over. We need good roads. Let's have 'em. 449626 38 Dillon County: Economic and Social Taxation. In 1920 the total taxable wealth of Dillon County was $14,178,120. In 1917 the figures were $9,527,135. Our increase in taxable property from 1910 to 1920 was 7G.65 per cent. Only seven counties out- ranked us in the increase. Dillon County in 1920 ranked fourth among the counties of the state in her general levy, state, county and school, with 35.25 mills while the average for the state was 29.25 mills. The average levy for the county, not including the principal town districts, was 49.25 mills. In this respect Dillon County ranks first among the counties of the state being a great deal ahead of the average for the state which was 37.60 mills. All of our school districts have levied special taxes for schools. Three counties have a higher tax rate than Dillon County. Our rate in 1920, .state and county, was $3.53 per hundred dollars. The county of Pickens ranks first with $4.00 for each hundred dollars worth of proi)erty. Next in order come Clarendon, McCormick and Dillon. Our neighboring county, Marlboro, ranks 43rd. with $2.45 for each hundred dollars worth of property. The present tax system is the only one that can be used under the constitution of 1895, and, tlio only twenty-five years old, has already proven itself inadequate to provide for the needs of a fast growing society. The law requires that all property, real, per- sonal and possessory be listed and returned, assessed and taxed at its actual value. That this provision is not practiced is well known by everybody in the state including state tax officials so that the State Tax Commission in 1915 found it necessary to recognize this fact officially and openly proceeded with the equali- zation of assessments on the percentage basis of 42 per cent. Taxation is a state-wide problem and its solution will be state- wide, but it will be interesting to mention some of the conditions that have arisen in our county by reason of the general property tax. The assessed valuation of the 240,504 acres of county real estate in 1920 was $2,591,465 making the assessed value of an acre of land only $10.50. This is an absurdity when land in Dillon County sells for from two hundred to four hundred dollars per acre and yet we wonder vyhy we have such high tax rates and still not raise sufficient revenue to meet the increasing demands of government. In addition to this, most of the personal property, both tangible and intangible, which constitutes a large part of our wealth and from which a large part of our faxes should be de- rived, docs not find a place upon our tax dools. The land owners and corporations bear the burden of taxation simply because men Dillon County: P>x)NOMr(j and Social 39 whose wealth is composed of persoiuil |)ri)pi>ity cim keop it off the tax books and the hiiidowners and corporations cannot. The present tax laws in the state make such a state of affairs possible. The tax system in South Carolina must be rebuilt from the founda- tion up and must provide separate systems for tiie taxation of tangible and intangible property. Facts About Wealth and Taxation in Dillon County. Rank. 15th— in total farm wealth, lf)20 census $22,055,053 34th — in farm wealth increase 1910-20, per cent 113.4. Georgetown County first with 244.5 per cent. State increase 143 per cent. 7th — in per capita country wealth, 1020 872.50 Marlboro County first with $1,129.63. 22nd — in percentage that assessed value of land per acre was to the census value, 1920, per cent.... 12.5 Census value $84.24; assessed value $10.51. 27th— in total taxable property, 1920 $14,174,300 Sth — in increase in total taxable property 1910-1920, per cent 70.05 Florence County first with 123.70 per cent. btate increase 60.22 per cent. 26th— in per capita taxable wealth, 1920 500.00 Ist — in average property tax rate, 1920 (mills) 40.25 State average, 37.60 mills. 4th — in tax rate per $100 assessed valuation for tax year 1920 : 3.50 Pickens County first $4.00; Marlboro County 43rd, $2.45 Sth — in percentage that mortgaged farms are of total number of farms, 1910, per cent 4 Total number of farms. 2,659. Number of farms mortgaged, 109. 4th — in percentage that mortgaged farms are of total farms owne. In 1910 the total school enrollment was 4,571 and in 1920 it was 7,411, Indicating an increase of 62 per cent. In 1910 the average daily attendance was 2,G17 and in 1920 the average daily attendance was 4.410 indicating an increase of OS per cent. There was 57 per cent of the enrollment in average attendance in 1910. In 1920 this had increased 5 per cent making the average attendance 42 Dillon County: Economic and Social 62 per cent. The conclusion from these figures is that the attend- ance has not kept pace with the enrollment- Rank of Dillon County Schools. There are few, if any goveniinentiU activities for which so many significant facts have been gathered, by uniform methods, over so long a period of time as has been done in the matter of education. Index Figures for Dillon County Schools, 1910 and 1920. ^ d Oj Oj OJ Oj Q> r^ s ^ 2 3 ^ '1 ?i o 9 1 ^ o o o o ^ ►J iH r-i 7\ o\ tH =»j C^ C. c: 1— j r^ T-i r-t rH •^ o o i C5 Per cent of school population at- tending school daily 30 37 GO G3 38 62 Average days attended by each child of school age 25 12.1 42.5 22.8 18.2 32.4 Average number of days schools were kept open 125 65 140 72 95 106 Per cent that high school attend- ance was of total attendance 6.86 6.86 8.8 .07 6.86 4.44 Per cent that boys were of girls in high schools 73.4 73.4 49 49 73.4 49 Average expenditure per child at- tending 10.20 2.31 57.68 3.78 9.28 29.10 Average expenditure per child of school age 6.38 .89 34.91 2.39 3.54 17.93 Average expenditure per teacher employed 15.11 3.98 56.54 8.23 10.80 40.32 Expenditure per child for pur- poses other than salaries . . 1.49 .17 49.90 .22 .83 23.57 Expenditure per teacher for sala- ries 29.76 7.67 64.12 15.98 21.57 47 96 DILLON COUNTY INDEX .... 33.82 20.98 56.34 23.75 27.65 41.27 STATE INDEX 24.87 29.39 Dillon County: Economic and Social 43 A comprehensive method of indicating school conditions and ten- dencies has been worked out by the Department of Education of the Uussell Sage Foundation by means of index numbers, which is a well established statistical device commonly used for measuring changes in wholesale and retail prices, and rates of wages over long [leriods of time, and which number lends itself readily in denoting changes, conditions and cost of education over a period of time. The ten sets of e high school privileges at one-third cost; make possible the securing of trained teachers; make possible more and better grade work; improve industrial conditions in the country; enrich the civic social life activities; conserve more largely the health and 'morals of the children ; increase the number of eighth grade comi)Ietions ; pro- 46 Dillon County : Economic and Social vide adequate supervision ; reduce truancy and tardiness ; develop better school spirit ; give more time for recitations ; increase the value of real estate ; produce greater pride and interest in country life ; prevent the drift to larger towns and cities ; bring more and better equipped buildings ; eliminate the small, weak school ; create a school of greater worth, dignity and usefulness ; make possible a more economical school ; provide equal educational oppor- tunities ; give much greater and better results in every way. When the school districts were formed it was necessary to carry the schools to the pupils, but now things are different. Good roads and trucks make possible the transportation of the pupils to the school at the expense of the county, and it has been very much more economical, to so arrange the situation than to multiply school units. It would be a good idea to lay out the county for consolidated districts and work towards securing the support of all the patrons in each district for bringing about the needed con- solidation. Negro Schools. Dillon County should give the negro better educational advantages ; for in so doing they would improve the condition of both the whites and blacks. With the right kind of education the negro would make a more useful and efficient laborer. He should be taught hygiene and sanitation especially ; for so long as the sanitary con- dition of the negro is bad, diseases will continue to spread. When one employs a cook or a nurse who has some contagious disease it is almost a certainty that some member of the family will contract that disease. The young child gets some lasting impres- sions from his nurse, thei'efore it is all the more important for the negro to have the right kind of training. In 1920 we spent $123,492.69 for white schools and $9,091.18 for negro schools. The per capita expenditures for whites was only $3-5.07 while that for the negro was only $2.34. Ten Year Gains in Dillon County Schools. 1909-1910 1919-1920 Per cent Gain. Total revenues $25,242.40 $114,356.71 475 Spent for teachers' salaries $23,100.00 $78,841.93 241 Expenditures $24,187.52 $123,583.87 448 Total school population 6,828 8,111 IS Total school enrollment 4.571 7,411 tj2 DiLLOx County: EcoxoMir and Social 47 Per cent of onrollinent in average at- tendance 57 G2 (K) Average annual salaries, white male teachers $570 $1,109.01 103 Average annual salaries, white women teachers $234 $000.47 1!J3 Average annual salaries, negro male teachers {f.172 $231.87 34 Average annual salaries, negro women teachers $78 $175.98 125 Total value of school property, white $111,000.00 $345,300.00 219 Total value of school property, negro $11,500.(X> $20,828.00 81 Number of local tax districts 2<) 25 Number with extra levy 20 25 25 Number of town schools 2 8 300 Number of country schools 25 20 Number of white teachers 58 91 57 Number of white school houses ... 27 26 Rank of Dillon County in School Matters. 9th — in per capita expenditures according to enroll- ment, 1920— whites $35.07 Darlington 1st with $72.09; Abbeville 40th with $10.09. 2Gth — in per capita expenditures according to enroll- ment, 1920— negro $2.34 Charleston 1st with $11.57 ; Bamberg 40th with $1.45. 5th — in per capita expenditures according to enroll- ment, 1920, whites and blacks $17.89 Charleston 1st with $33.11 ; McCormick 40th with $7.23. 11th — in per capita investment in school property, 1920. $12.46 Florence 1st with $29.02; Fairfield 40th with $2.77. 22nd — in receipts from state appropriations, 1920 — both races $18,212.00 Spartanburg 1st with $49,511.38; Jasper 40th with $3,180. 28th — in average length of session in white town schools, 1920— days 166 Calhoun 1st with 180; Horry 4Gth with 130. 48 Dillon County: Economic and Social 21st — in average length of session in days in white country schools, 1920 — days 129 Charleston 1st with 159; Cherokee 4Gth with 90. 5th — in average number of pupils to teacher according to avez-age attendance, 1919 Ki Jasper and Williamsburg ranlj 1st with 15 each. State average, 21. 29th — in average number of pupils to teacher, according to enrollment, 1919 27 Beaufort, Berkeley and Jasper rank 1st with 23 each. State average is 33. 1st — in per cent of schools that are one teacher schools, 1921— per cent 4 Darlington 2nd with 10.34 per cent ; Georgetown and Beaufort last with 76.47 per cent. State average 40 per cent. 5th — in average salaries paid white women teachers, 1920 ,$690.47 Charleston 1st with $890.25; Lexington 4Gth with $385.38. 17th — in average salaries paid white men teachers, 1920; $1,109.01 Charleston 1st with $2,317.02; Lexington 40th with $537.00. 17th — in average number of pupils to school according to average attendance. 1919 49 Charleston 1st with 114; Jasper 4r,th with 21. State average 51. 45th — in percentage of enrollment white pupils in regnl:ir attendance, 1920 G0.8C Georgetown 1st with 80.89 per cent; Chei'okee 46th with 00.3 j)er cent. State average 67.91 per cent. 18th — in average number of pupils to school according to enrollment, 1920 SI Cliarleston 1st with 159; Berkeley last with .31. State average 81. 14th— in total value of all schtsr.l property. 1921 $.375,128 Greenville 1st with $2,568,374; Jasper 46th with $38,042. 38th — in number of local school tax districts, 1920 25 Greenville 1st with 97; Beaufort last with 9. VII. DILLON AGRICULTURE Edgar T. Thompson Dillon County Predominantly Agricultural. In our (liscn.ssion of Dillon County and her problems it must be remembered that our county i.s and always has been predomi- nantly agricultural. By far the jji'^fitest i)art of our county wealth is made up of farm property. The population of the county living outside of incorporated towns is 87.3 per cent of the whole and a large part of the inhabitants of the towns are directly dependent on agriculture for a livelihood. All of the eight in- corporated towns of the county with the exception of Dillon and Latta have^ luader 700 inhabitants. In iniO we were outranked by only eleven counties in the state in the annual value of farm wealth produced and these counties were in every case much larger in population and territory than Dillon. The value of the annual products at that time amounted to ,?4.4S1,075. We note that S3 per cent, or $3,557,209, of this amount consisted of non-food crops, e.specially cotton. Five counties outranked us in this particular. In 1920 the total value of all crops in the county was $14,022,125 according to the last census report. Of this figure SO per cent or $11,685,104, consisted of non-food crops. Thirty-four counties outranked us in having a smaller percentage. Our rank in the value of non-food crops was 6th among the counties. But of this annual wealth produced only a small proportion re- mains in the county. It is useless and foolish to produce great wealth and send it out of the county and state for commodities which might just as well have been produced at home. So much of our money goes to enrich western farmers who produce the bulk of the food and feed that our farm animals and our farm folks consume year by year. Government experiments have proven that the man who raises food and feed crops along with his cotton and tobacco is invariably in a much better condition than his neighbor who raises cotton and tobacco exclusively and buys his food and feed. 50 , Dillon County: Economic and Social Idle Lands. One of the greatest problems of Dillon County, although not as great as with other counties, is our sparsely settled rural districts and our lai'ge idle area. It goes without argument that we need more white people in Dillon County. While we are outranked by only ten counties in the state in rural population per square mile with 5.^.7, still our country population is much too small. Captains of Industry are careful that their entire plants are in op- eration all the time. Not so with our farmers ; for in 1920 Dillon County had 24.2.57 idle acres of land. Forty counties had more. If we set aside 50,000 acres of woodland as a permanent source of fuel and timber and allow 15 acres of farming land to each new-comer then we have room for 1,617 new farm settlers or about 323 new families of five members each. Due to the fact that ours is a small county we outrank only five other counties in room for new settlers. Dillon County needs this increase in farm popu- lation for we need to put into active use our capital invested in wilderness aci-es. Farm Tenancy. But the greatest problem which we have to face is our yearly increasing amount of farm tenancy. In view of the fact that 82.1 per cent of the farmers of Dillon County do not own the farms they operate or the homes in which they live it seems imperative that this condition should receive serious consideration. The State of South Carolina with G4.5 per cent of all farms operated by tenants ranks third among the states of the nation in amount of farm tenancy and Dillon County is outranked by only one other county in the state, Marlboro, making it safe to say that this county ranks among the first in the United States. We have no reason to feel proud of this fact. The relationship which farm tenure bears to the economic and social life of the state does not occupy in the minds of the leaders of thought that position its importance would justify. And the situation is intensi- fied when it is realized that tenancy is steadily on the increase. As has been stated 82.1 per cent, or 1,934 farms out of the 2,S24 farms in Dillon County, are operated by tenants. Of these farms 1,771, or 92 per cent, are operated by share tenants and only 70 farms, or 4 per cent, are operated by cash tenants. Of the 177,071 acres in farms in Dillon County in 1920, 107,329 acres, or 60.4 per cent, were operated by tenants. In other words, 82.1 per cent of all farms and only 60.4 per cent of the land in farms were operated by tenants. This condition is to be expected for it is Dillon County : Economic and Social 51 evident that the farm operated by the tenant is smaller than the farm operated by the owner. One of the worst features of farm tenancy is that it is con- stantly on the increase in most of the counties of the state. In 1910, 72.7 per cent of Dillon County farms were operated by tenants. By 1920 the amount of tenancy had increased 9.4 per cent. Altho in 1910 we were near the top of the list of counties yet our percentage increase to 1920 was exceeded by only two other counties, Dorchester and Hampton. Farm tenancy is a glaring problem that calls upon the patriotism of the state. The evil that it fosters and its deadening influence must be nullified. Tenancy runs hand in hand with illiteracy. Statistics have shown that in the counties where the percentage of white tenancy is highest, there also is found the highest per- centage of white illiteracy. The average for six counties in the state having the largest percentage of share tenancy shows that there is a percentage of 15.1 in white illiteracy, while for the four counties having the smallest percentage of share tenancy, only 5.5 per cent illiteracy prevails. In its best forms, tenancy in a limited amount may be a good thing because it is an institution which provides for getting the land into the hands of those who are in a position to cultivate it. In the North and West a large population of tenant farmers are young men who are in the process of earning enough money to buy a farm. But this does not hold true in the South where "once a tenant always a tenant" is very nearly the real condition. The average tenant in the South is such because economic conditions I)revent him from buying land, or else he is lacking in industry, thrift or sagacity. To make every tenant a landowning farmer would not be desirable, even tho it were pi-actical. There are many, particularly in the case of the negro, who thrive better as share tenants and crop- pers under the close supervision of their landlord than they would were they their their own bosses, and it is better for the economic well-being of the commonwealth that they remain so. However for the thrifty young white man there should be no barrier placed in his way to speedy ownership of his own farm and home. The sense of this ownership breeds in him qualities of self respect that make him a stable element in the community, a greater social factor in his neighborhood, a center of wealth production and retention, and one whose interests encompass the development of the neighborhood, community, county, state and nation. A study of farm tenancy in a typical up-country community shows that the voung fellow who starts out working hard, living 52 Dillon County: Economic and Social within liis income and saving all he can, is tlie one wlio steps out of the tenant class into the owner group. There are no insu- perable barriers to ownership as yet, except those of rank mis- fortune, in a state where 50.2 per cent of our farm lands are lying idle. The principle obstacles in the way of ownership in South Carolina are a lack of ideals of ownership and a great deal of ignorance, indolence and thriftlessness. The situation assumes unusual importance when we consider its relationship to the existing boll w^eevil situation. It is the tenant farmer who will find the matter of adjustment most difficult. He has never leaned toward the system of safe farming which makes him provide his food and feed supplies at home ; and it is going to be hard to instill in him as quickly as necessary new methods of farming which must be learned to accommodate an enforced change from the present system of agriculture. The opportunities of landowners, merchants, bankers, and busi- ness men to aid in this program of education for readjustment constitutes a responsibility, for it is the tenant farmer as a rule who is the must inaccessible to the ordinary methods of propa- ganda. He must be reached by the direct contact of those who are accustomed to advise him in his business affairs. Everything possible should be done to stimulate the owners living on their own farms and taking an active interest in the vital matters of maintaining soil fertility and building up community life. Size of Farms. In 1910 Dillon County had 2,659 farms. In 1920 there were 3,440 farms in the county or 781 more than in 1910. Thirty-one counties have more farms than Dillon County. The following table for 1910 and 1920, compiled from the last two United States census reports, shows how our farms were classified according to size in those years : Classification of Farms in Dillon County According to Size. 1910 1020 Under 3 acres 4 1 3 to 9 acres 78 68 10 to 19 acres 2.10 577 - 20 to 49 acres 1.2S3 1.855 50 to 99 acres 561 620 100 to 1 74 acres 302 194 175 to 250 acres 97 60 260 to 499 acres 58 39 500 to 999 acres 21 19 1,000 acres and over 5 7 v***^. A FEW DILLON COUNTY COUNTRY HOMES The Best Way to Keep the Country Boy and Girl on the Farm. Djllon County : Economic and Social 53 From this table we note that farms of from 20 to 49 acres seem to be the most popular size in Dillon County. In 1910 when there wore 175,470 acres in farm land in the oounty, the avcraije size farm was 05.!) acres. By 1!»20 when there were 177,071 acres in farm land, the average farm had dropped to 51.6 acres. According to the 1910 census the percentage of f;irni land im- proved in Dillon County was 5S.2 per cent. In this respect we ranked i;>th among the counties of the state. The census definition of improved land is "all land regularly tilled or mowed, land pastured and cropped in rotation, land lying fallow, land in gardens, orchards, nurseries, and land occupied by buildings." In the average improved acreage per farm in 1920 Dillon County ranked 31st among the counties with 30.1 acres. Drainage. Proper drainage insures a high degree of profitable agriculture and the best healthful conditions. Acres of land now filled with swamps and stagnant water which breed mosquitoes and give rise to malaria could be made to produce magnificent crops and return large profits. Dillon County has more undrained land than we would ordinarily suppose. Acccu'ding to the 1920 census, 960 farms reported having drainage and 945 farms as needing drain- age. No report came from the remaining 1,533 farms but it is safe to say that many of them are in great need of drainage. In terms of acres, there were 28,044 acres of farm land reported as provided with drainage and 21,900 acres of farm land as needing drainage. South Carolina has over 3,(K)0,000 acres of overflowed, wet and swampy lands, or nearly one-sixth the area of the state. These undrained acres are generally of great natural fertility and their drainage is of great economic importance to individuals and to the vState. To promote drainage, the South Carolina Drainage Act was passed in 1912 for the formation of drainage districts making large drainage undertakings possible. But on December 31, 1919, organized drainage enterprises covered only eight-tenths of 1 per cent of the total area of undrained land. The lands most immediately in need of drainage are the wet por- tions of cultivated farms. A great deal of the drainage of these lands can be done by the individual owner to his great profit. The average cost of the tile drainage systems is about $.30.00 per acre. The average increase in the value of crops grown on tile drained land is $15.00 per acre which is a yearly dividend of 50 per cent on the cost of drainage. 54 Dillon County : Economic and Social A casual survey of a map of Dillon County shows the exten- siveuess of the swamp and branch area, some of which might be drained with profit. Cotton and the Boll Weevil Problem. According to the 1920 census report the total value of all crops in Dillon County was $27,098,150. Of this amount $11,685,104, or 43 per cent, was produced by the cotton crop. The county ranks 18th among the counties in the number of bales produced with 38,000. Five counties, Marlboro, Darlington, Lee, Calhoun, and Clarendon, outranked Dillon in the average number of pounds produced per acre. Marlboro County led the state with 336 pounds per acre while Dillon's average was 299 pounds per acre. From these figures it is evident that cotton Is the dominant field crop of Dillon County. Since 1793 when Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, cotton production has gone forward by leaps and bounds all over the South and especially in South Carolina. So fast has it advanced in the Pee Dee section of the State that in 1920 the cotton acreage for Dillon County alone was considerably over that of the whole of old Marion County in 1885. We have only to note that cotton acreage in Dillon County in 1920 was 33 per cent of the total land in farms to realize that Dillon County is in the list of counties practicing the one-crop system. There are seven fundamental evils to this plan of farming. First : It impoverishes the soil. Second : It increases the risk of the farming enterprise. Third : It makes the supply of money available at one time and develops the time-credit system. Fourth : It makes the marketing machinery difficult. Fifth : It makes for idleness of machinery and labor. Sixth : It lowers the general intelligence of farm labor. Seventh : As long as we persist in employing the one-crop system we need not ever expect to be a self- sufHcing county in food and feed supply. Diversification of crops will be brought about earlier than it normally would h;ive come as a result of the boll weevil. This great pest crossed the Rio Grande River into Texas at Brownsville about 1892 and caused considerable loss. And yet farmers in Dillon County are very little better prepared to cope with the insect than were the people of Brownsville, Texas thirty years ago. The weevil has now about reached the limit of cotton cultivation. The entire state of South Carolina has been covered by its advance and 66,662 square miles in the cotton belt were invaded last year. A committee of farmers and business men headed by Mr. D. R. Coker of Hartsville, investigating the boll weevil problem in South Carolina, made seven suggestions for its control and eradication. Dillon County : Economic and Social 55 First : Destroy immediately all cotton stalks as soon as the croi) is gathered. Second : During the fall and winter destroy all cover in which the woovil may he hiding. Third : Cotton should he lihorally fertilized with a quick acting fertilizer. Fourth : Early planting of approved variety of cotton with plenty of seed. Fifth : Cotton should he left thick in the drill. Sixth: Poisoning the boll weevil may he done hy the use of calcium arsenat<» if done at the proper time and under favorable conditions. Seventh: Rota- tion of crops. It often takes a great calamity to awaken a iieople and teach them important lessons. The boll weevil has been and is a thorn in the side of the South but its advent has unquestionably given it a new agriculture. AVe can turn our apparent disaster into a great benefit if we use old cotton lands for the production of food and feed stuffs. Tobacco. Within the past few years Dillon County has very extensively taken up the cultivation of tobacco. In 1920 only five other counties produced larger yields than Dillon, namely : Florence, Williamsburg, Darlington, Horry and Marion. Dillon County produced 5,850,000 pounds or an average of 650 pounds per acre. In this respect we tied with Horry County for seventh place. Dillon is well provided with wai-ehouses, there being seven in the county. Most of these have been turned over to the Tobacco Growers Cooperative Marketing Association. Tobacco rec[uires high grade cultivation and a great deal of fertilizer. It is a cash crop and is harvested between spring grain and cotton, thus bringing money into circulation during the sum- mer months. With the boll weevil threatening our cotton crop tobacco promises to make a good substitute. But tobacco growing is a severe drain on the fertility of the soil so the tobacco farmer should by all means rotate his crops and never allow the same land to grow tobacco two years in succession. Corn. In 1920 Dillon County produced 864.000 bushels of corn, or an increase of 389,083 bushels over 1910. Only three counties, Anderson, Aiken, and Allendale, outranked Dillon in the increase. Dillon County also ranked fourth in the percentage inc!'ease from 1910 to 1920 with 84.3 per cent. In corn production per capita, Dillon County ranked 12th among the counties with 21.7 bu.shels per person. 56 , Dillon County : Economic and Social In 1919 the average number of bushels produced per acre in Dillon County was 21.7. Charleston, Beaufort, and Darlington were the only counties outranking us in this respect. Almost equalling the record of Jerry Moore of Florence and Captain Drake of Marlboro, Claude McDonald, a Dillon County boy, in 1913 produced 211 bushels of corn on a single acre and won a state championship. In 1915 Carey McKenzie made 190 bushels on an acre at a cost of only nine cents per bushel. Xo credit is given young McKenzie for economy of production but an official in the Department of Agriculture says this is a world's record. Sweet Potatoes. In 1910 there were 843 acres planted in sweet potatoes with a yield of 135.424 bushels. According to the Bureau of Crop Estimates, in 1920 there w-ere 1,300 acres planted with a yield of 162.500 bushels. In the same year we led the state in the yield per acre with 125 bushels. Why should the boll weevil cause Dillon County such worry and concern? Few counties in the state can boast such records as those made in corn and sweet potatoes by Dillon County. When we have learned that foodstuffs can be grown more profitably than they can be bought, low priced cotton, the one-crop system, the boll weevil and many others of our worries will cease to bother us. Our Livestock Situation. Statistics show that Dillon County is lagging in the matter of livestock production. Our farmers should bear in mind the fact that a high per capita country wealth goes hand in hand with an abun- dance of domestic animals and that low per capita wealth is always found where cattle and other farm animals are lacking. Compiled statistics from the 1920 census gives Dillon County a rank of 25th among the counties in the per capita value of live- stock products with a value of only .$9.46. Edgefield County led the state with $22.06. Our increase from 1910 to 1920 in the number of hogs was 75 per cent. Our rank in this regard was 22nd. Anderson County showed the greatest progress with an increase of 276 per cent. Dillon County takes a better stand in per capita produc- tion of pork with 98.8 pounds per person. Our rank here was 12th among the counties. Dillon County led the state in the increase in the number of cattle between 1910 and 1920 with 109 per cent. Very differ(>nt is our rank in regard to beef production in pounds per person in 1920. In this particular our rank was 34th with 8.6 pounds per person. Dillon County: Economic and ^^^iociAL 57 From 1910 to 1920 Dillon's poultry increase was 48.3 per cent, giving her a rank of IGth among the counties of the state. In the nnnilior of jKiunds of poultry per person the county ranks l.^th with 10.;i pounds. Saluda County ranks first in this item with 15.4 pounds per person. Horses liave increased rather slowly — from 1,055 in 1910 to 1,179 in 1920. P.ut this is probably due to the advancement of farm machinery and the growing popularity of automobiles. On the other hand, mules increased from 2.909 in 1910 to 4,420 in 1920. Machinery on the Farm. Dillon ranks fourth in the amount of money spent for implements and machinery on improved hind per acre in 1920 with $10.55. We were outranked by Anderson, Lexington and Greenville. The state average is $7.77. , No doubt Dillon's high rank as an agricultural county is largely due to our extensive use of up-to-date farm machinery. Modern farm machinery is indispensable to the farmer who would progress and keep apace with the farmers of other states and especially of the western states. Farm Loan Associations. There are two Farm Loan Associations in Dillon County. One at Latta has closed IS loans for farmers amounting to $102,550. In addition, loans to the amount of $180,450 had been applied for in April, 1922. The Association at Dillon has closed ten loans amounting to $65,r!00 and $05,500 has been applied for. This shows that our farmers are beginning to realize the value of the Federal Land Bank in extending credit on farm security. The general purposes of the bank are to lower and equalize interest rates on first mortgage loans; to i)rovide long term loans with the privilege of repayment in installments thru a long or short period of years, at the borrower's option ; to stimulate co-operative action among families ; to make it easier for the landless to get laud ; and to provide safe and sound long term investments foi the thrifty. The Land Bank is steadil.v growing in popularity with farmers who have become acquainted with its methods of doing business and it has enabled scores of men to go into farming on their own responsibility who otherwise would have been doomed to the fate of tenants. Facts About Dillon Agriculture. Rank 15th— in the value of all farm property, 1920 $22,055,053.00 12th— in annual farm wealth produced, 1910 4,481,075.00 58 Dillon County: Economic and Social 34tli — in precentage increase in farm wealtli, 1910-1920, per cent 113.4 Georgetown first with 244.5 per cent. Increase for state 143 per cent. Gth — in the percentage tliat non-food crops are of tlie annual farm wealtli produced, 1910, per cent. . . 87.3 35th — in the percentage that non-food crops are of the total value of all crops in Dillon County, 1920, per cent 80.0 Value of all crops, 1920, $14,022,125. Oai— in the value of non-food crops, 1920 .$11,085,104.00 Orangeburg first with $18,216,362 ; Jasper last with $471,371. 5th — in value of crops per acre, 1920 $48.00 Beaufort first with $72.00; York last with $27.00. 2nd — in per capita crop values, 1920 $219.95 Calhoun first with $234.01 : Charleston last with $25.37. 7th — in cotton production in bales, 1921 35,000 Spartanburg first with 71,000; Beaufort last with 500. 18th— in cotton production in bales, 1920 38,000 Orangeburg first with 93,000; Beaufort last with 400. 6th — in production in pounds of tobacco, 1920 5,850,000 Florence first with 9,900,000. 7th — in yield per acre of tobacco, pounds, 1920 650 Marion first with 670 pounds. 6th — in cotton production in pounds per acre, 1920 .... 299 Marlboro first with .336 pounds ; Georgetown last with 183 pounds. 30th — in bushels of wheat per capita .1 Lexington first with 1.9 bushels. 1st — in production in bu.shels of wheat per acre 13 State average 7.4 bushels. 7th — in production in bushels of oats per acre, 1920 . . . 22.5 Marlboro first with 28 bushels; State average, 18.3 bushels. 3rd — in bushels of oats i)er capita, 1920 5.6 Saluda first with 10.2 bushels; State average, 2.1 bushels. Dillon County: Economic and Social 59 4th — in corn production in bushels per acre. Ili20... 21.7 Charleston first with 23.6 bushels ; State average, 15 bushels. 12th — in bushels of corn raised i)er capita 21.7 Calhoun first' with 31.8 bushels ; State average, 16.3 bushels. 4th — in percentage increase in corn production, 1910- 1920, per cent 84.3 Charleston first with 108.2 per cent. 4th — in number of bushels increase in corn production, 1910-1920, bushels 389,088 Anderson first with 577,080 bushels. 22ud — in percentage increase in hogs, 1910-1920, per cent 75 Anderson first with 276. 2ntli — in the value of livestock products per peivson, 1920 9.24 Edgefield first with $22.06. 13th — in number of pounds of poultry per person, 1920 10.3 Saluda first with 15.4. 16th— in increase of poultry, 1910-1920, per cent 48.3 Charleston first with 97.4. 12th — in annual pork production in pounds per capita, 1920 98.8 Horry first with 183.3. 34th — in feed production in pounds per person, 1920 . . 8.6 Beaufort first with 129.8. 1st — in the increa.se in the number of cattle. 1910-1920 per cent 109 4th — in amount spent for implements and machinery on improved land per acre $10.55 Anderson first with $11.69; State average, $7.77. 2ud — in percentage of farm tenancy, per cent, 1920.. 82.1 Marlboro first with 85.0 ; State average, 64.5 per cent. 13th — in per cent of farm land improved 58.2 Barnwell first with 68.4. 32nd— in number of farms, 1920 3,440 Anderson first with 8,910. 43rd — in hay and forage production, tons '. 2,880 Orangeburg first with 19,775. 41st — in room for new settlers 1 ,617 Horry first with 18,982 ; Allendale last with 256. 60 Dillon County: Economic and Social Agricultural Statistics on the 12 Leading Crops of Dillon County for 1921. (Based on the report of the United States Bureau of Markets and Crop Esti)nates.y Acreage Yield per Estimated Acre Production Value Cotton 60.000 291 lbs. 35.000 l)a]es $2,800,000 Tobacco 7.000 650 lbs. 4.550.000 lbs. 409,500 Corn :n,000 19 bu. 589.000 bii. 435,860 Sweet Potatoes 1,000 107 bu. 107,000 bu. 96,300 Irish Potatoes 300 85 bu. 25,500 bu. 38,250 Sorghum Cane 100 90 gal. 9,000 gal. 6,120 Oats 8.000 28 bu. 224.000 bu. 163,520 Wheat 600 13 l)u. 7.800 bu. 16,224 Rye 140 11 bu. 1.540 bu. 3.850 Peanuts 225 860 lbs. 193,500 lbs. 7,740 Hay 4,600 4.140 tons 82,800 Cow Peas 6,000 36.000 bu. 63,720 VIII. BALANCE SHEET IN FOOD AND FEED PRODUCTION Dewey Stephens. Deficit in Food and Feed Production. From a study of data contained in the United States Census of 1920, and estimates of tlie average annual consumption of food and feed supplies for man and beast compiled from reports from the Federal Department of Agriculture, we find that there is a shortage of $2,440,985.13 in food and feed products in Dillon County. Our food and feed needs for 1919 were $4,841,498.13 and we pi-oduced in our county that year food and feed valued at $2,400,513. When we fail to produce the necessities of life it means that they have to be imported and our money has to leave the county to pay for them. Why not raise these supplies and keep our money at home, for wealth retention is equally as important as wealth production in the progress of a county. The soil of Dillon County with very little effort will grow almost any of the food commodities profit- ably ; consequently there is no valid excuse for the existing condition. If we were to include in the deficit the money spent for dainties and luxuries the figure for under production would be even more enormous. Shortage in Detail. The shortage in detail consists of 1,057,256 pounds of meat; 1,117,072 pounds of butter; 228,613 fowls; 260,875 dozen eggs; 235,080 bushels of corn; 96,482 bushels of wheat; and 7,333 tons of hay. Reasons for Shortage. There are three main reasons why Dillon County fails to produce its own needed food and feed supplies: (1) excessive farm tenancy, (2) lack of attention to food and feemer .iwlio l)fls>a, isqnplus oif, potatoes Instead „pf Ki'adiuK tlioiu fuul. ;proi)erly. prepaii-ijig tjiem ,for, tlie market, he takes all slzefi aiirl grades. ^ixQdtogethoi: and tries to find a market for them. Even if he fmds a market he;. will not a-oreive nearly flS'iniu-h as he wouldc-i^ thp.y, were prop^vlyj.gmxltjd. . I^erlmps .the consumer ha«,-to J^py^a, ibuphelrin ior0e^, tp .^eit a- peck of the desiretl grade.- If! the. producer . h,ad .property graded them he pnuld have uged the sorry ()no,s to.feed l>i9, stppk on;, and perhaps roci'ivod just as nnirh , foi,V; t^ft.jbest :ont]6?. ,ps he did for his entire crop. .jiv-o mv;- ■ 'j ly: i Facts About Food and Feed Production In Dillon County. n^The Dillon Count yr rarjk • at ,the Jeft,, margin .shows „Jm)W; mayy counties do better. . , . _. 4th — in corn iprodiiction pei' acre, bushels, 1920 ;»,...,,. 21.7 Average for State, -15 bushels per, acre.;! Charleston led with 23.6 busheis i>er acre,; J'ltih — in the per capita piuoduotion .©f co^ru, bushels pen ,. .. .. .). . . . , . 21.7 The per capita annual/ consumption fi.gurg ill the 'United •States, int-hisive; of livtfstoeb needs, is 31 bushels; deficit per peiison in Dillon County, 9.3 bushels ; total deficit for f..ul county 2o.''>,0S5 busliels;. state: a'verase.'pro-!,/.:;; n • .!•..£ duction in 1920.. 1.G.3 bushel^! per person.. 22nd— in total corn production in. bushels,' 1920 . j . . .i..i! 548,538 Orangeburg CcHuity led. with li460,318 bush- els ; Georgetown -County I'anked last., witlji 239,157 'bushel Si DiHou's: corn iproductioni foi' 1.0 yearsi 1010-1920, increased 84.8 per cent. orit5.'^.083 bushels, i : -The state:- iuorease V..t)\ was 31 per cent; 40 counties shovyed an in- • f 7i* crease in production ; 3, showed a decrease. 30(11 — in wheat production perporson, in buwhels, 1920. 0.1 Needed 4 bushels ^per person; ; deficit) per person, 3.9 bushels; total deficit for Dil- y.i; Ion CounlTi-, -98,584 bushels. In 1910 Dillon ' : County raised 50 bushels and in 1920, 4.630' bushels of wheat. 0)8 Dillon County : Economic and Social 1st — in whent production, bushels per acre, 1920 .... 13 State average, 7.5 bushels per acre; Wil- liamsburg County came second with a yield of 12.5 bushels per acre. 7th — in oat production, bushels per acre, 1920 22.5 Total crop was 14.3,117 bushels, or 25.7 bushels per work animal per year, or 2.2 quarts per day for each work animal. From 1910-1920 production decreased 18 per cent. 42nd — in total crop of hay and fora?ie produced, tons, 1920 2,SS0 From 1910-1920 our hay crop increased 48 per cent. For each work animal .3 pounds of hay was produced ; ten pounds were needed ; 2,880 tons were produced ; 10,218 were needed. The deficiency was 7,338 tons. 34th — in beef production per person, pounds, 1920 .... 8.6 ►State average, 17.8 pounds ' per person ; needed 150 pounds of meat production. Beaufort led with 129.8 pounds ; Greenville came last with 3.6 pounds. 12th — in pork production i)er capita, pounds, 1920 .... 98.8 Average for the state 07 pounds per person. Horry ranks first with 183.3 pounds per person. From 3910-1920 the number of hogs in Dilbin (Vanity ini-reiised 75 per cent. 13th — in poultry production per person, fowls, 1920 .... 10.3 Needed 12 fowls per person per year ; de- ficit 1.7 fowls per person per year; total deficit 42,973 fowls. Saluda ranked first with a production of 15.4 fowls per person, and ('luuieston came last with 2.6. The number of fowls in Dillon County in- creased 48.3 per cent from 1910-1920. 27th — in egg deficit per person, dozen, 1920 10.3 Needed ] 7.5 dozen per person ; shortage 7.2 dozen per person ; total shortage per county 182,002 dozen; total production 181,490 dozen. 28rd — in butter produced per person, pounds, 1920 .... 3.S Cherokee ranks first with 23.0 pounds per person. State average was 8.2 pounds Dillon County : Economic and Social G9 25th — in value of livestock produced per person, 1920 . . $9.24 Edgefield ranked first with $22/)6 per person; Charleston was last with $1.71. Dillon County Balance Sheet in Food and Feed Production. 1. Food and feed needed. 25,278 people @ 161.28 $4,076,835.84 5.599 work animals @ $75.75 $424,113.24 2.980 dairy cattle @ $35.67 . . 106,296.00 711 other cattle @ $15.55 .. 10,771.65 186 sheep @ $3.44 639.84 17,336 swine @ 012.86 222,840.96 764,662.29 Total food and feed needed $4,841,498.13 2. Total food and feed produced : Food and feed crops $1,864,011.00 Dairy products $51,702.00 Poultry products 76,704.00 Honey and wax 1,161.00 Total value of beef cattle and swine 406,935.00 536,502.00 Total food and feed produced $2,400,513.00 Shortage in in home raised food and feed 2,440,985.13 Cotton and other non-food crop values 11,685,104.00 Distribution of Food and Feed Shortage : (1) Meat needed for 25.278 people @ 152 lbs. per person 3,842,256 Meat produced— 375 calves @ 150 lbs 56,250 326 cattle @ 350 lbs 114.100 74.723. poultry @ 31/2 lbs 261,530 14,707 swine @ 160 lbs 2,353,120 Total meat produced 2,785,000 Shortage 1,057,256 (2) Butter needed for 25,278 people @ 48 lbs. per person 1.218,344 Produced 96,272 Deficit 1,117.072 70 Dillon County: Economic and Social (3) Fowls needed for 25,278 people @ 12 fowls per person 303,336 Produced 74,723 Deficit 228;613 (4) Eggs needed for 25,278 people @ 17 1-2 doz. per person 442,365 Produced 181,490 Deficit 200,875 (5) Corn needed for 25,278 people at @ 31 bu. per person 783,618 Produced 548,538 Deficit 235,080 (6) Wheat needed for 25,278 people @ 4 bu. per person 101,112 Produced 4,630 Deficit 96,482 (7) Hay needed for 5,599 work animals (a; 10 lbs. per day, tons 10,213 Produced 2,880 Deficit 7,333 Dillon County Livestock: 1920 Census. I. Animal Units on Hand 1919 : Animal Units 5,505 mature work animals 5,505 20 spring colts (1-4) 5 86 yearling colts (1-2) 18 1,739 dairy cows 1,739 1,952 other cattle (1-2) 976 8,402 mature hogs (1-5) ' 1,680 8,934 spring pigs (1-10) 893 149 mature sheep (1-7) 21 37 lambs (1-14) 3 74,723 poultry (1-100) 747 Total animal units 12,587 II. Animal Units Needed— 301,440 A divided by 5 60,288 Per cent of animals in a lightly stocked farm area 28 Per cent below the level 72 Note — A lightly stocked farm area means one animal unit for every 5 acres of farm lands — A unit is a horse, a cow, 2 colts, 5 hogs, 7 sheep, or 100 hens. IX. EVIDENCES OF PROGRESS Edgab T. Thompson. Dewey Stephens. Although f)illon County is oue of the youngest counties of tlie state, she has talien her place among the more prosperous and progressive. However, we cannot rest on past achievements if we want to keep this position among our sister counties. We should always remember that there is room at the top. Dillon County is wonderfully blessed in soil, climate, and people, but in the words of Henry Van Dyke we should be "content with our possessions, but not satisfied with ourselves until we have made the best of them." Dillon's place in the state should be where she already is in the heart of every true son of Dillon County — first on the list. Educational Advances. Dillon County has one of the best school systems in South Carolina. This can be proved by comparing the index figures of Dillon County with those of the state, and of other counties. With the exception of average attendance our school situation is one to be proud of, but it is not ideal. We had in 1921 a smaller percentage of one-teacher schools than any other county in South Carolina. Out of a total of twenty- five white schools in the county only one of these is a one-teacher school. Darlington ranks second in this respect and Florence third. This is a significant fact and oue in which we are to be com- mended, for the day of the one-teacher school seems to have passed in Dillon. This situation looks even better for Dillon when we learn that 40 per cent of the schools of the state are one-teacher schools. Everywhere over the county are springing up handsome brick school structures. No better type of monument can be erected in any county, and the passerby notes as he views each of these perma- nent buildings that there resides a people who are putting "first things first." 72 Dij.LON County : Economic and Social , Our Towns. Our towns are our most conspicuous evidences of progress as shown by their remarkable increases in population during their comparatively short pei-iod of existence. Dillon, the county seat, is a beautiful little growing town of about 2,200 inhabitants. Here an enormous amoiuit of business is carried on for a town of this size. Its place in history is as pronounced as that of Dillon County and it is the coming town of the Pee Dee. Both Latta and Lake View are also young towns and their prosperous past points to a still more prosperous future. The whole of Dillpn County is giving promise of being the best rural community in the country to live in. She is waking up to her vast possibilities, and she is solving a great big, all-inclusive problem — that of community co-op- eration. Wealth. Dillon County can justly pride hei-self upon her amount of farm wealth. In 1920 it amounted to $22,055,052 which is more than that of 31 other counties in the State. During the period 1910-1920 only 6 counties made a greater increase in per capita farm wealth. During the same period the increase in total taxable property was 76.65 per cent while the avei'age for the State as a whole was 60.22 per cent. This great increase In taxable property gives an insight into the actual wealth of Dillon and the willingness of the people to bear public burdens for public progress and prosperity. Dillon County citizens are better served by banks than those of 36 other counties in the state for we have one bank for every 3,000 people. This may partially account for the fact that we oversubscribed our Liberty Loan quotas by 5.2 per cent, showing that our people are not lacking in patriotism if that can be measured in dollars and cents. It may or may not be an evidence of progress that only 4 per cent of our farms have a mortgage debt upon them. As stated in a previous chapter, a mortgage is not necessarily a bad thing. Conditions sometimes make it necessary for a farmer to mortgage his farm and often it Is a sign of progress. It may mean capital borrowed for productive purposes, purchase of land, better build- ings and equipment, and even at times for the education of his children. But too often farms have been mortgaged so that the owner can indulge in the luxuries of life. In the last few years many farmers in the State have mortgaged their farms in order to purchase automobiles and expensive luxuries. Taken from this latter angle our small percentage of mortgaged farms, exceetled by M o O n o O p Dillon County: Economic and Social 73 only 4 other counties in the State, shows a safe and sane attitude among tlic f;iniK*rs of r>illoii County. It is better to be safe than be sorry. Agriculture. Our county is a farmer's county and the farms of any community form the backbone (»f that community — a fact that is not less true of Dillon than it is of the State as a whole and the nation at large. Upon their labor, their prosperity, good cheer and high courage depend to a large extent the prosperity and wealth of the county. Dillon County with her variety of soils and advantageous seasons has an excellent record in the total and per capita yield of crop wealth. In this last particular Dillon outranked in 1920 every county in the State save one with a per capita value of $219.95. Thus is Dillon's boast of a superior agriculture backed up by the figures themselves. Dillon as the fifth tobacco pi'oducing county in the State is aligning herself with the co-operative movement for its marketing. The same is true of cotton, in which crop only 17 counties in the State produced a larger yield in 1920. This notwithstanding the fact that Dillon County is one of the smallest counties in the State. Between 1910-1920, Dillon County increased her corn production by 389,083 bushels, or 84.3 per cent. Only three other counties outranked us in this respect. During the same period our increase of 109 per cent in number of cattle was greater than that of any other county. In 1920 Dillon County led the State in the yield per acre of sweet potatoes. The census of the same year gives Dillon 24,257 aci-es of idle land. Forty counties had more. But these idle acres at a conservative estimate are worth a half million dollars; and they represent just that much dead capital. Neither the owners of this land, the agriculture of the county, nor our busi- ness men can afford a dead investment of this sort. Dillon County Fair. Some of Dillon's loyal citizens, realizing the need and benefits to be derived from a coiinty fair, formed in 1920 the Dillon County Fair Association, with a capital stock of $15,000 dollars, divided into fifteen hundred shares with a par value of $10.00 each. The business of the association is conducted by nineteen directors who are members of the association, elected from the different townships of the county. The officers of the association are : President, Secretary and Treasurer, Secretary of Races, Executive Committee, Board of Directors and Bureau of Information. 74 Dillon County : Economic and Social County fairs act as reflectors or indexes of the sentiment of tlieir communities. Tlie types of exliibits displayed and the character of the fairs promoted advertise, either advantageously or disad- vantageously, the interest people have in meeting the exigencies of the situation. Fairs, therefore, are not only popular institutions but are worth while institutions and should be maintained and improved. An authority on fairs in another state says that the county fair should be repres-entative of the county and should as far as possible give a fair idea of the resources and possibilities of its farming, mill- ing, educational, and business advantages. The county fair is gener- ally backed by the business men of the county seat where the fair is held. They thinlv by drawing a crowd to town tlieir volume of trade will be increased. But as a matter of fact the country people do not buy much on fair days. They save their nickels for the many attractions of the fair. The business men soon find that their plan is not working, and they frequently give up the fair as a hopeless venture. For this simi)le reason most of the county fairs have failed. A few county fairs in the United States have lived for sixty years or more. The fairs that have lived so long have never had horse races, ferris wheels and the like. The value of a county fair consists in its being able to show the products of the homes, farms, mills, and factories of the county. The purpose of the county fair is destroyed when the farm and factory exhibits are given a place of minor importance, and various spectacular attractions preoccupy the attention of the crowd. Here again the premium list must be complete and prizes offered for strictly home products. The people of Dillon usually put across what they undertake and we believe the Dillon County Fair will stand the test of time. County Federation of Women's Clubs. The Dillon County Federation of Women's Clubs was organized in November, 1915, at the court house in Dillon. The purpose of this organization was to unite the clubwomen for greater service to the homes, schools and communities throughout tlie county. From the small begining of sixteen delegates representing as many clubs it has grown to a membership of more than forty clubs with an attendance of about five hundred. This was the first county federation in the State to include all the women's clubs, both falerated and unfederated. A number like it have since been formed in other counties. Among the goo(» help- ful, skillful and uselnl : in training the heart to he kind, syniiiallietic and true; in caring lor t lie health to give us power to enjoy lile. to resist disease and to make us more etficient." Farm Demonstration Work. The Agricultural Extension Service of South Carolina, with head- quarters at Clemson College, was organized, and is now conducted with the idea fixed in the minds of its members that tliei'e are certain fundamental vital [irinciples in the economic production of crops and the marketing and distribution of the same tliat nmst of necessity be adhered to in a logical and systematic way. To this end the Extension Service has outlined a clear anitants per banlv 3,135 7th — in pi'oduction of oats in bushels per acre 22.5 7th — in tobacco production per acre (pounds) 650 7th — in per capita country wealth $872.50 8th — in per cent increase in taxable property, 1910-1920 76.05 9th — in per cai)ita investment in school pro])erty accord- ing to enrollinent $35.07 9th — in homicides in South Carolina (number) 1 9th — in number of inhabitants per automobile 15.1 nth — ill rural poimlalidii jicr s(|uare mile 53.7 Dillon County : Economic and .Social 79 llth — in per capita investment in school property $12.48 12tli — in bushels of corn, per capita 21.7 12th — in annual pork production, per capita, pounds 98.8 l."Uli — in per cent of farm land improved rjS.2 13th — in number of pounds of poultry, per person 10.3 loth — in value of all farm property $22,055,053 loth — in per cent of white population 4S.G X. OUR PROBLEMS AND THEIR SOLUTION Edgar T. Thompson. The object of this chapter is to try and furuisli the power "to see ourselves as others see us." For it is most true that the in- habitants of a community or county are oftentimes blind to what is plainly evident to another who views the scene from afar. A visitor is more keenly observant of the things in wliich the com- munity fails to measure up than he is of what that community ranks best In. The many reasons that we have to be proud of Dillon have been pointed out and discussed in the preceding chapter. We have now to gather up and present the vital defects in the economic and social life of the county and, as for as that is possible, to suggest remedies for them and to point the way toward a better and greater county. If Dillon County ranked first in everything there would be no need for this survey, the purpose of whicli is to show our faults and imperfections as well as our virtues. In many respects Dillon ranks with the leading counties of the state but there are also many things in which we are among those at the bottom of the list. All our problems, then, are not solved ; nor can they be solved without the cooperation of our business men and bankers, our farmers, our teachers and religious leaders. It will require the united efforts of all these to blot out our delinquencies and to reach high levels in every particular. A County- Wide Chamber of Commerce. Where there are vital problems to be solved it is most important that there .should be some organization whose purpose it is to solve them. Where, there are exceptional features to be advertised it is important that there should be some agency to advertise them. Dillon County needs a county-wide Cnamber of Commerce. We have no organization among our men which has for its purpose the development and betterment of the county. A most admirable work in regard to schools, health and civic improvement is being done by the Dillon County Federation of Women's Clubs, but this does not lessen the need for a men's Dillon County : Economic and Social 81 orgauization. The interest of our towns and our county are so intermingled that the success or failure of one must affect the other; hence we shall do well to develop a county unit feeling. A County Clianiber of Commerce with city and farmer folk both working together would do much to spread the doctrine of co- operative ownership of the best farm machinery, diversification, rotation, permanent pastures, improved livestock, winter cover crops and many others. By co-operation something might be done to use and build up our 24,257 idle acres. We have room for 1,017 neW farm families on laud that needs to become productive. Many other questions would arise to challenge the united thought and effort of all. Farm Tenancy. The problem of farm tenancy has been discussed at length in a previous chapter. There is only one remedy — a strict enforce- ment of the compulsory school attendance law and a good public school system. As a stepping stone to farm ownership tenancy cannot be looked upon as an evil tendency, but when a tenant uses rented land simply to earn a living year in and year out, en- tertaining no hope of better tilings, it is an evil. The solution is. of course, farm ownership, wherever possible, for whites who are now tenant farmers. Poor School Attendance. Our rank in per cent of school attendance on enrollment is deplorable. Of the forty-six counties in South Carolina, Dillon County in 1920 made the poorest showing. This fact should stir the interest of everyone who has at heart the efficiency and wel- fare of the .schools in the county and should prompt those directly concerned to improve the school attendance. When a prominent progressive county like Dillon is at the bottom in any matter con- nected with schools — the most important institutions of the county — it is time for our people to insist on a strict enforcement of the compulsory .school attendance law. Our poor showing is not wholly ascribable to the coloi'ed children for an examination of the records shows that the percentage of regular school attendance for white children was 60.86 per cent and in this respect Dillon County ranks 45th among the counties. But we are proud to say that Dillon County has fewer one- teacher schools than any other county of the state. The one- teacher school is a listless, lifeless affair and the fewer there are in any county the better. 82 , Dillon County : Economic and Social Illiteracy. Nearly 11 out of every 100 white citizens of Dillon County are unable to read or write their names. In this respect Dillon County ranks 43rd among the counties. And there are only 4G. Illiteracy Is truly Dillon County's greatest single problem. The eleven white citizens mentioned above are sheer illiterates. Besides these there are a great number of near-illiterates tho little attention is given to them. This fact is appalling. The remedy, of course, is education. The majority of our illiterates are of such age that they can be educated in the public schools. But not unless they attend them. Let us insist, then, upon the strict enforcement of the compulsory attendance law. In the same category with illiteracy falls our low rank in church membership — only 60 per cent of our people ten years of age and over are church members. Our rank here is 40tja among the counties. The fact that forty out of every 100 of our citizens ten years of age and over belong to no church whatever calls for some sane think- ing by our churches of every name and faith. An Ill-Balanced Farm System. In per capita country wealth we rank 7th among tho counties with $872.50 per individual. Nevertheless a great many of our farmers are poor. They do not have the money with which to buy improved farm implements for more extensive farming and thereby lower the cost of production while increasing the volume or farm products. Lack of ready cash in our country regions is a cardinal deficiency. In order to have good roads, good schools, good churches and fine farms we must have more money — far more money than we now have. And yet we yearly send out of the county large sums for imported food and feed supplies which can be prod'Ucetl by our farmers at home. This drain on our money resources makes us all just so much the poorer year by year — mer- chants, farmers, and bankers alike. The solution is suggested by the fact. We are enslaved by cotton and tobacco and neglectful of food crops and livestock. There are no soils and seasons in the United States better suited to foo<^l and feed production and livestock farming. It is not impossible for us to produce the staple bread and meat sujiplies we need for home consumption. In 1920 Dillon County produced non-food crops to the value of $11,685,104 compared with $2,377,620 for food crops when $4,841,498 was needed. In 1920 the wheat crop was only one-tenth of a bushel per inhabitant, while four busliels per person per year are neetled. Dillon County: Economic and Social 83 Tweuty-nino (•(nuitii's li.-ivc m liotter rating than Dillon in this item. The 102U census gives only 2,880 pounds as the total amount of our hay and forage production. Our rank in this was 43rd. To properly balance our farming system we must diversify our crops. Co-operative Movements. This an age of co-operation. It is the solution of many of the farmer's problems as the 1-4,000 farmers' buying and selling organizations in the United States bear witness. Co-operation is not merely a profit-making thing and it is more than an agency for protecting the farmer against exploitation ; still greater benefits than these come to the co-operator. When the farmer joins a co- operative society he pledges himself to promote the new social and economic order toward which co-operation is aiming. Co-operation has secured a firm hold in Dillon County. On May 1. 1022, 183 of our farmers had signed up 16.800 bales of cotton to be marketed thru the South Carolina Co-operative Cotton Marget- ing Association. In Marlboro County, 203 farmers signed up 37.105 bales. Most of the seven tobacco warehouses of the county belong to the Tobacco Growers Cooperative Marketing Association. These facts speak well for Dillon County. Libraries. There should be a library in every rural town. This library should have relation to its community as a school or church has. It should be an educational center. It has been estimated that only about 5 per cent of our total population ever read books and magazines and very few of these come from rural communities. Of the Latta library Mr. L. M. Bouknight. former superintendent of the Latta schools, said, "As a center of community activities, I thiiik our building functioned well worth consideration. The general atmosphere was conducive to undertakings for the town that could not have originated from any other center. I cannot say too much for the Latta Library."' Our towns could not take a more progressive step than for each to erect a modern, well equipped library. Such a step would be a partial remedy for our illiteracy problem. Tax Reform. Taxation is a state-wide problem and its solution must be state- wide. But at the present time it is probably more acute in Dillon County than in any other county in the State for two reasons. 84 Dillon County : Economic and Social First : Because the average property tax rate for this county is higher thau tliat of auy other county. lu 1920 it shows 49.25 mills as against the state average of 37.60 mills. Second : Because our county is distinctly a farmer's county. And since 90 per cent of the State's revenue comes from the general property tax and 65 per cent of this from country real estate it is evident that the farmers of the State are bearing the brunt of taxation. Intangible property in this State escaping taxation amounts to $300,000,000. As compared with the larger and richer counties there is very little property in Dillon County es- caping taxation. Consequently this county and every other county in which there is a small proportion of iutangib'e property is bearing an unjust share of the tax burden of the State. The remedy lies in the adoption of the program for tax reform as outlined by the Joint Special Committee on Revenue and Taxa- tion appointed by the General Assembly of 1020. This program follows with the years moved up to apply to the next few years. 1. The adoption by the General .Assembly of 1923 of a Joint Resolution submitting to the electors of the State amendments to the present Constitution which would remove the general prop- erty tax limitations. 2. The inauguration and prosecution of a state-wide campaign of education and publicity to the end that the people of the state may be fully informed upon the subject of taxation and in position to pass intelligently upon the grave question before them. 3. The adoption by the peoi^le at the general election of 1924 of the constitutional amendments proposed by this General Assem- bly. 4. The passage by the General Assembly of 1925 of an act pro- viding the necessary special machinery for revaluing the property of the State at full value and for making an accurate survey and in- ventory of all other taxable resources of the State. 5. Upon the basis of the accurate data and statistics so produced the enactment by the General Assembly of 1926 of a compulsory revenue act combining into one harmonious whole a remodeled property tax, the income tax, the business tax and the inheritance tax. The adoption of such a program as the above would go far toward lifting a part of the burden of taxation from the farmers of Dillon County and of the State and placing it upon the property which is either very lightly taxed or escaping taxation entirely. Our representatives in the General Assembly should insist upon its adoption. • •»••>•■»..».■«-«-».•«.■>■.«..»•■< j Carolina Milling Co., Inc. Authorized Capital $ 1 60,000 MANUFACTURERS OF HIGH GRADE CORN MEAL, FLOUR AND MOLASSES FEEDS DEALERS IN SEED GRAIN AND HAY DR. WADE STACKHOUSE, President & Treasurer M.S. STACKHOUSE, Vice-President & Secretary • i Blum & Kornblut, Inc. ISADORE BLUM, Pres. LEON KORNBLUT. Sec. & Treas. Men's and Womens' Wear Wholesale and Retail Dillon County's Largest Mercantile Establishment Our buying power for six stores enables us to give you better values for less money STORES IN DILLON CHERAW LATTA TATUM LAKE VIEW CHESTERFIELD I "The Stores Dependable" i Palmetto Hardware Co. MORRIS PASS DEPARTMENT STORE Ladies' ana Gents' Outfitters Dillon s Largest and Best Store DILLON MULLINS S. C. PHONE 1707 I DEALERS IN \ Hardware, Tinware and Woodenware, Trucks, Automobiles, Auto Supplies, Coffins and Caskets, Stoves and Ranges, Lime and Cement, Paints and Oils, Imported China, Sporting Goods and Farming Implements, **The Store of Quality and Service" DILLON, S. C. McLaurin & Thompson Wholesale Grocers Hay, Grain and Provisions A. A. C. Co. Fertilizers | Dillon, S. C. { J. P. McLaurin J. F. Thompson ; i f Braddy- Wheeler Co., Inc. HARDWARE Lowe Bros. Paints and Oils, Fairbanks- Morse Engines, Home Light and Water Plants, Emmerson-Branningham Farm Machinery, Kitchen Stoves and Ranges, Red Top Steel Posts, LotKs Hot-Blast Heaters, SPORTING GOODS Service and Satisfaction L. C. BRADDY, Jr. W. B. WHEELER DILLON, S. C. Eugene C. Stanton DILLON, S. C. GENERAL INSURANCE '"^he 'Progressive Jlgency" We represent some of the oldest and largest companies, giv- * ing you the most liberal policies and | ? I 00 per cent protection \ Office Phone 55 Residence Phone 155 1 I t ■ t T i /. M BRIDGMAN j DILLON, S. C. I PHOTOGRAPHER \ ylgent For Singer Sewing Machines I Yours For Good Service I R. H. WIGGINS Sales and Exchange Stables Buggies — Harness — Wagons — Horses — Mules We carry a full suppl}' of well known Visson wagons I and Hackney buggies. Each of these makes is noted | for its comfort and durability. f We also carry a full line of horses and mules dur- f ing the winter and spring seasons. * LITTLE ROCK, S. C. 1 Herald Publishing Company The completest Printing establishment in Eastern South Carolina. We print everything from a visit- ing card to a coupon bond. Blank Books and Ruled Sheets. Dillon, South Carolina ..«.. ««#*.»..#..«..«. . .»..». .».»».*»**»^»..»-» ),•-•••••••-••••••••••■••-••••••••••>•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••»••••-•••• •••-••••••^•••.^••••••••••.•^•^••••.^ t The Bank of Fork i FORK, S. C. Safe, Sound, Progressive, Accommodating We Solicit Your Patronage L. M. ROGERS, • M. E. CARMICHAEL. President Cashier R. S. ROGERS. I Vice-President Palmetto Cash Grocery DILLON, S. C. Wholesale and Retail Grocers I Farmer's Exchange i I Groceries — Feeds — Seeds — Distributors of Carolina I Milling Company's Products — De Ijaval Cream I Separators, Dealers in agricultural insecticides and I dusting machines Dr. Wade Stackhouse, Pres. W. J. Adams, Sec. & Treas. ■•»••«-»-«'■»■■«>■•€"••••»••• ^^ ■>#..»..#. .*•.#• ■ »..»..»..»..«..»■»»«»♦«■»«•♦»»♦»'♦"•*»♦-♦ " ♦—»■*♦'•»•*♦-*♦**♦■*< » Economy Garage Lake View, S. C. Prompt and Courteous Attention to Autoist GAS AND OIL Our Motto: "Service Which Satisfies" We Solicit Your Patronage C. E. FLOYD, Proprietor Smith Drug Company, Inc. E. P. SMITH, Sec'y & Treas. "The Rexall Store' Prescriptions. Drugs and Toilet Requisites, Norris Exquisite Candies Eastman Kodaks and Supplies, Symphony LaAvn and other fine stationary. Waterman and Parker Pens and Pencils, A complete line of school Text books and supplies I "The Store Your Doctor Eecommends" I LAKE VIEW, S. C. I ! r' »-♦•'»-»">'•»"»-*"«•••"•"» " »■• » '• i DILLON COUNTY WAREHOUSE AND MARKETING CORPORATION t I Authorized Capital $100,000.00 { BESTJACILITIES FOR STORAGE t Directors : OF I Dr. J. H. David COTTON I R. S. Eogers c • i .. .• .• T ° , special attention given to mar- i W. H. Smith keting cotton. Protects jthe J. R. Regan farmer's interests. « I L. Cottingham t. L. MANNING, i A. V. Bethea President i H. M. Rogers DR. J. H. DAVID, ? rp T TVT • ™ Vice-President ^ T.V ;x^T ""^ L. COTTINGHAM, W. W. Evans Sec, Treas., &:Gen., Mgr. Evan's Pharmacy s The Rexall Store | I ? Prescriptions, Drugs, and Toilet Requisites. | Kodaks and Supplies. I Nunnally's Fine Candies. I Symphony Lawn and other fine Stationery. I Ice Cream and Soda, i Parker and Waterman Pens and Pencils Prescriptions filled b}^ licensed Pharmacists. We cordially invite you to our store . "The Right Drug Store'' j Phone 46 Dillon, S. C. \ Smith-Major Co. Wholesale Groceries Hardware, Coffins and Caskets IVe Lead the Leaders 1801-1922 University of South Carolina Columbia, S. C. The University offers courses leading to the following degrees: i i 1 . School of Arts and Sciences, A. B., and B. S. t J 2. School of Education, A. B. t I 3. Graduate School, A. M. I f 4. School of Engineering, C. E. | I 5. School of Law, LL. B., 3 year course, 5 Professors. i I 6. School of Business Administration. I i Next Session Begins September 20, 1922 I FOR INFORMATION. WRITE DR. W. S. CURRELL, President. COLUMBIA. S. C. « » » t tt-t-* -*-*--*--*--*■■* -*-*--*-^-^-*— *—*-*--*--*- T--"^-^-*—*-*- T *ttTTt t t t«»g » I The Southern Cotton Oil Co. i Manufacturers Cotton Seed Products High Grade Fertilizers I DILLON MILL W. E. CALDWELL, Manager The Only Cotton Seed Oil Mill in Dillion \ County Operates an Eight Gin Modern Ginnery at Dillon Operates a Four Gin Modern Ginnery at Little RocI^, 5 Miles From Dillon DISTRICT OFFICE, Columbia, S. C. C. FITZSIMONS, District Manager C. C. FISHBURNE, Ass't Dist. Mgr. I UNIVERSITY ot CALihUKi>»iA AT LOS ANGELES LIBRARY The Bank of Lake View Lake View, S. C. Capital Stock $50,000.00 Surplus - - $25,000.00 I I A Safe and Sane Bank • 1 Run on Strict Banking Principles Depositor}^ of Dillon County Funds We Invite Your Business I # • t I I R. S. ROGERS. W. M. GADDY. | • President Cashier f i L. M. OLIVER, R. E. PACE, I i Vice-President Asst. Cashier I 1 ^ f The First National Bank Dillon, S. C. CAPITAL $100,000 The only National Bank in Dillon County. The only bank in the county holding membership in the great Federal Reserve System. This Bank, is the Depository For This Publication Watch The First National- --Its Coming E. T. ELLIOT, Chairman of Board A. B. JORDAN. Vice-President R. S. ROGERS. President F. M. FITTS, Cashi ler TBIOTATICO.. OOLCHBIA. S. 0. ►•■•••«4