■•'i 
 
 '^ 
 
 f ,«©^ 
 
 and its Headers. 
 
 ^^^^^ngs^a 
 
 vSCHCnUHE. 
 
 
 4W^*l<3<KJ1«'«Ml*lQ1J^4^y*>*i*. 
 
 m 
 
 ■■'•i:<jj 
 
 ■ 4; 
 
 i, 
 
 *' 
 
 j 
 
 
 ill 
 
 mm
 
 /fei^
 
 it
 
 ^h e Bible 
 
 AND nS READERS 
 
 ^BY- 
 
 EVA SCHEELINE. 
 
 " Go, little bark. I send thee out 
 Upon the Future's heaving eea, 
 And watch thee on thy trembling route — 
 For thou art all in all to me." 
 
 • • • 
 
 « • 
 
 San Francisco. 
 
 . P. J. HrAI.Y, PrOMHIIKR 
 
 18M.
 
 ^^Opyrtpht96. 1896. 
 
 James H. Barry, Printer, 429 Montgomery Street.
 
 53/ 
 3 
 
 TO THE 
 
 oo 
 
 « NATIVE DAUGHTEKS OF CALIFOKXIA 
 
 FROM 
 
 A NATIVE DAUGHTER. 
 
 2cS(>| l\
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Preface 7 
 
 Introduction 11 
 
 CHAPTER I.— The Bible's View of tlie 
 
 Importance of Man. , .23 
 CHAPTER II.— The Mighty Scientific 
 
 Frown 30 
 
 CHAPTER III.— Three Conceptions of 
 
 God 37 
 
 CHAPTER IV.— Gospel Traditions 46 
 
 CHAPTER v.— DilTerent Theories of In- 
 spiration 54 
 
 CHAl'TKR VI.— 'IMk' Age of the Earth. . .66 
 CHAPTKR \'ll.— lU'capituliilion 69
 
 P K E F A C E 
 
 It is probable the impression that the 
 Bible teaches contradictions, is wider and 
 deeper than the facts warrant. If so, 
 preachers themselves, and scientists, are 
 largely to blame. Preachers too often 
 think they infallibly know the teachings 
 of the Bible, while scientists too often 
 tliiiils tlicy infallibly know the teachings 
 (»r I he r.ibl*' an<l of science also. These are 
 larg«* siiljjerts, iiinl it iii;iy not be deemed 
 harsh for nic h> inlimalc that there is room 
 for niisliikc in llicsc nuilfers. Of conrse, 
 every lliinking j^'Tsom will ndniil lli;i( lie 
 entertains sonio crroiK'ons belief. No 
 really sane man belie\<'s Im' is infallible. 
 While, as a mallei- of fact, every one holds
 
 8 Preface. 
 
 some erroneous belief, no honest man holds 
 one conscientiously. To a man the whole 
 body of his beliefs is true. He, therefore, 
 believes some error to be true. It is re- 
 quired of every mun, therefore, that he be 
 open to conviction. 
 
 We read into the Bible, or between the 
 lines, meanings found by scientists of later 
 days. So of metaphysical systems, Philo 
 found Plato in Moses, and the "Christian 
 Fathers" found the warfare of souls in the 
 tramps of Israel in the wilderness, as well 
 as in the battles. So the geological the- 
 ory is taught by Moses. So the evolution 
 theory is countenanced, at least, in the 
 Bible. It would be taught outright if the 
 theory of evolution were established as a 
 
 fact. 
 
 I believe that it is chiefly because claims 
 are made for the Bible which it does not 
 make itself, that s</ much indifference pre- 
 vails regarding its contents. 
 
 By the word Bible, I designate the Old
 
 Preface. 9 
 
 and New Testanieiits in their original 
 tongues. 
 
 I ask my readers to approach the study 
 of my theme, if not free from bias, at least 
 willing to investigate impartially, and to 
 accept that which is manifestly true. 
 
 Truth asks only a dispassionate hearing, 
 and scorns to be wooed and won by him 
 who grants it less. 
 
 With the sole purpose of contributing 
 something to the steady advance of truth, 
 I am, 
 
 Respectfully and sincerely, 
 
 Till-: AUTIIOK.
 
 I N T K O 1) U C T O R Y . 
 
 WliPii tlie forefathers of some modern 
 critics oi Mioses were naked savages, con- 
 testing' witli fist, dnb, stone, noose, and 
 spear, witli \\\U\ beasts, fV>r the mastery, 
 tlie cliildicn of Israel had overthrown dy- 
 nasties, siihjuiiated UiMi;doms, built cities, 
 and |i(*i-va(hMl the eartli with 1h<' i(h'a of 
 the sa( i-cdness of home, and I he oneness of 
 (Jod. When lie was wiiliii.u of the Cre- 
 ator, and ni.in, l!i<' ^oii of (Jod, ma(h' in liis 
 inia;^e, and pi-opliesyinii iIh' <lominion of 
 man o\('i' :ill nnMMhinc lliinus, Uwy had 
 scarcely cnoniili fid'cc in liicii- spines (o 
 sliind creel, to i^MZc willi dundi woinler 
 into I lie Ilea \ ens. 
 
 Tlial <i<M| did ik.i, diierlly nv iinliiccl ly, 
 make levelations of Idmself, his world, and
 
 12 Introductory. 
 
 man, bt'fore the time of Moses, there is 
 no evidence to prove, either in the Bible 
 or out of it. Speech and writing existed 
 centnries before the time of Moses*; man 
 Avas as dear to tlie heart of the Father 
 before Moses was born, as since; man v/as 
 as ignorant, as needy, as sinfnl, as help- 
 less, as nndone, tlien as since then, and 
 God changes not! It is uneqnivocall.y de- 
 clared that God "spake by the mouth of 
 his holy prophets," who have heen since the 
 world began. Liithei- says "many things 
 were written and described ere Moses was 
 born." 
 
 Rnt let ns sni)iK»se that Moses, sick at 
 sonl of the lizard and calf gods of Egypt, 
 made np his mind that he would Avrite of 
 God and creation; or, let ns su])pose that 
 he, inspired by the thought of God and 
 
 * The 78th Psalm shows that history came down in tradi- 
 tion — "our fathers have told us." Lost hooks of the Bible; 
 also. Book of Wars (Num. 2l:i4), Hook of ./usher in .Joshua, 
 10 : IS. 
 
 The Book ot Annals is mentioned more than thirty times in 
 the Book of Kings.
 
 Introductory. 13 
 
 good, so wrote; iu either ease, the mean- 
 ing of what he wrote remains the same. 
 
 Suppose a multitude of people who are 
 slaves in Egypt. Let that condition ex- 
 ist for a few centuries. Suppose, now, 
 that they shall leave Egypt. Their labor 
 had been profitable to their owners. They 
 were not released on economic grounds, 
 but their presence in Egypt had become 
 injurious, even blighting, to the dominant 
 race. Tliat is the result of slavery. It was 
 iKtt, however, until the blight reached the 
 ui)per classes, that they were let go by 
 their masters. After releasing the slaves, 
 tlie Prince of Egypt changed liis mind, and 
 pursued them. Sii])])osc an unarmed mul- 
 titude of men, women, ami cliildnMi, liotly 
 pui'sncd by an ;iiiiiy <»ii liors«»back. I'liey 
 arc hciiimcil in <»ii all sid<'S. Arc you ready 
 now, in tlionglit, io Avitness ;i wholesale 
 Imtrliciy? Cod foilnd. The sea before 
 thcni iini.sl ((pen lo h-l I hem <*scape. It 
 matters not whether tliev arrived at the
 
 M Introductory. 
 
 precise iiioiiieiit when the waters ebbed by 
 the hiw of nature, that is, by God acting 
 through nature, or whether He caused a 
 wind to divide the sea. The fact is, they 
 did escape. If these helpless, hapless, and 
 innocent victims had been put to the sword 
 while in an honest effort to acquire peace- 
 ful liberty, that would have been a dark 
 problem to ex])lain, beside which the 
 thought that God made the winds and the 
 waves serve Him, is luminous. 
 
 Now, is the moral sense satisiied simply 
 with the escape of the pursued? What of 
 their selfish and lustful pursuers? Let 
 them drown: that is as little as can ap- 
 pease man's sense of justice. If theolo- 
 gians have followed the drowned host far- 
 ther than death, there is no warrant in the 
 story for that. 
 
 Naturally, the people who left Egypt 
 had a human leader. Name him Moses. 
 A mixed multitude followed him. He 
 leads them into a wilderness. He must
 
 Introductory. 15 
 
 control his followers. His will must be 
 supreme. He must have power to execute 
 it, and also execute it unhesitatingly on 
 occasions of need. He has no ordinary 
 task. Did he control this people unaided? 
 This people wlio certainly had not im- 
 proved \\\ tlie lash? This dissatisfied and 
 somewhat sullen people? If Moses con- 
 trolled them unaided, he stands on a dizzy 
 pedestal far above the greatest leaders 
 with whom history brings us into acquain- 
 tance. 
 
 X(»l only did Moses control this mixed 
 mullitiidc, but he evoked order out of an- 
 archy, and established systemati<- training 
 and discipline among them. I>el iis Iry to 
 image the conditions, and see what was 
 r<'(|uired. 
 
 TJH'ie is ;i mult il iidf li\iiig out doors, 
 sl<'('|iiiig in tents. Tlicy needed ;i uciieml 
 clijirl oC roiKliMi. 'riint cjinil needed 
 ;hii li'iii iciit ion ;is su|»i-enH' ;iihI intlexil)le. 
 He gives the |»eople "Ten Words;" he
 
 16 Introductory. 
 
 claims he received them from God. These 
 "Ten Words" rebuked idolatry, lying, lust, 
 dishonesty, in stern and uncompromising 
 tones. True, some of these "Ten Words" 
 were kuowu doAvn in Egypt, but they were 
 known as dictates of policy; known from 
 a utilitarian standpoint. 
 
 Moses gives these, and others, unknown 
 in Egypt, as alive with the utterance and 
 power of God. He needed more than to 
 be learned in all the learning of Egypt to 
 put behind the "Ten Words" the awful 
 majesty of the One Eternal. A priestly 
 invention, this? All the priests in Egypt 
 had not the capacity to make the inven- 
 tion. He was immeasurably the superior 
 of the priests of Egypt before then — then, 
 and even down to the present day. It is 
 easier to believe that he made a just claim 
 — that <Tod did speak to his servant, 
 Moses. 
 
 But it is in human nature to violate 
 moral law, and commit crimes. Moses
 
 Introductory. 17 
 
 was dealing with man, not only as an in- 
 dividual, but as a communitj^ Every 
 crime possible to man must be depicted, 
 analyzed, defined, and their punishments 
 allotted. This is not a pleasant duty, nor 
 does it make pleasant reading. It results 
 in the penal code of a people. If theolo- 
 gians have thought that the penal code 
 of the Israelites was to be read in public, 
 to men, women, and children, they thought 
 wrongly; the thought is not in the code. 
 If "infidels" have objected to the code 
 being published at all, they have made an 
 ignorant objection. 
 
 But it is better to prevent crime than to 
 punish it; so this should receive consider- 
 ation from Mos<'s in his mighty problems 
 in liic wilderness. If a slate of mind posi- 
 tive against criiiic could be brouglit about 
 — if the Sinless One would :ii<l man! So 
 Moses sought to hi-iiig his jx'oph- into ser- 
 vice to TJod. ||<' inciilc;ite(l worship. Peo- 
 ple must have forms of worship. He gave
 
 18 Introductory. 
 
 them forms. These forms are so <>iveu as 
 to cultivate order, exactness, ideas of 
 beauty, grandeur, holiness; and behind 
 the form stood the Former; thev were 
 types of thought to impress in man true 
 conceptions of God. Moses inculcated 
 obedience to God, and love to the neigh- 
 bor. That he wrought wisely is evident, 
 for he laid an eternal moral basis under 
 his people. 
 
 Yet, let him do liis best, man does fall 
 into folly. "Shall Gold hold out against 
 man forever? Shall (Jod not pity? Yea, 
 he shall; but man must lav down his will- 
 ful rebellion." To such "the Lord will ])ro- 
 claim himself as merciful, long suffering, 
 plenteous in grace?" This idea was sought 
 to be brought about by the ceremonies of 
 atonement. In after years, through no 
 fault of Moses, some Israelites thought 
 that there was virtue in sacrifices in and 
 of themselves. Isaiah rebuked this in 
 stern tones. He set the sacrifices upon
 
 Introductory. 19 
 
 their true Mosaic foimdatiou, as being 
 iiieaut as the Aisibk^ expressions of inward 
 efforts at cleansing, and worthless without 
 the latter. (Is. 1:10-18.) 
 
 The people in the wilderness must have 
 a Civil Code also. Moses gave them a Civil 
 Code. This code takes property as it was, 
 recognizes the rights of property, and 
 while slavery was an institution in the 
 order of things, made it less grievous. 
 
 X(ti' did Moses pretend to be infallible 
 ill liis luethods of administrating the gov- 
 ernment. He was a teachable, humble 
 mail, as is manifest by the readiness with 
 wliicli he ;i«l<»i)l<'(l an iiii|»roveiueuL sug- 
 geslcd by iiis Inl licr-iii-la \v, .Iclliro, priest 
 of .Midiau. (lOx. IS:1, ]:\-2(\.) 
 
 But a |»(M>|»1(' living out doors, in a 
 wilderness, aic pcciiliMrly liable lo sickness 
 and coniagion, arising Irom aiiv neglect 
 of cjeiinliness. There slioiild he hroinl ami 
 coni)u-e|iensi\ e rules hiid down lor them, 
 nnder the strongest possible anihentica-
 
 20 Introductory. 
 
 tion. Moses did so. Ouly the foolish think 
 he ought not to have done this. Only silly 
 people think they were given to be read 
 from tlie pulpit, or in family worship. 
 
 During the stay in the wilderness, some 
 object lessons in crime were enacted. Man 
 is not seen at his best in these matters. 
 But mau, if he is to be known as he is, 
 must be seen at his worst. That would 
 not be a book of life, only a make-believe, 
 which represented man in one phase alone. 
 We insist that the ugly aspects of man are 
 not meant for public exhibition. We in- 
 sist that only in the admumtration of law 
 mid justice, or to did hoth, should they be 
 dragged into light. Tliey irere told in this 
 connection. They were the reports of criminal 
 procedures. He sins against man, who, for 
 purposes of evil, exposes deformities of 
 body or mind to the public. 
 
 Men in war are not seen to the best ad- 
 vantage. Even a good man cannot fight 
 in the best of humor. He will do things
 
 Introductory. 21 
 
 then that misrepresent the real man he is. 
 When he misrepresents himself, if he says 
 anything about God or man, he will mis- 
 represent them. 
 
 If a people enter a strange land which is 
 inhabited, the strangers ask questions, and 
 begin aggressing. Tliose who enter must 
 fight or quit the land. Should the Israel- 
 ites go back to Egypt? The earth belongs 
 to man, but not to one man, uoi- a race of 
 men. If tlie new comers had to fight, what 
 could pill more nerve into them than to 
 tell them that "the Lord is on their side?" 
 Mosos dirl right in so Mssnring his people. 
 Events have shown h<* was right. The na- 
 tions that, (»j)posed him arr not, while Israel, 
 thoii;;h scattered, is yet lu'lping to shape 
 for good the destinies of man.
 
 "As a man, man is the creature with whom I have to do. 
 and the varieties of his character interest me more than all the 
 possible varieties of mosses, shells, and fossils."— Hannah 
 More. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 THE BIBLE. 
 
 To vvliuin written and to whom not written. 
 
 The Bible was not written to Atheists. 
 It assumes the existence of God. It was 
 not written for Deists. It assumes that 
 God does coninnmicate with man. It does 
 nol iliiiik ;i denial nf lliis wurtli a mo- 
 nHMil's <<»iisid<'iali<>n. 
 
 I( \\;is iiol written lor A^nostii's. Zo- 
 |>li;ir is rliiiiiK'd ;is (tiic (tf this class. The 
 Jlihlc r('|Hi(ii;ii('s /opli.-ir (Job. V2:'-U). An 
 nidwiowri ;ind jiltsoliitely iinknowMliIc <!<»<! 
 is jtrnrl i(;ill \ llie S;IMI<' MS Ilo (iod. .M licll 
 less UMs iIm' I'liltlr written lor tli(»se Af^nos- 
 tics who, whilr holding- Hint the l-Mrst 
 Cjiiise is Kiihiinuii :Mid uiiLiinirdhlc, proceeil
 
 24 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 to tell us about him; bow be brought man 
 and the world to their present condition, 
 and bow he must govern them in the fu- 
 ture, or forfeit their approval. 
 
 The Bible is written to Theists. In its 
 opening sentence it assumes the existence 
 of God as a matter of course, and the ex- 
 istence of a belief in God bv man as funda- 
 mental. Nowhere does it recognize that a 
 reasonable doubt of God's existence is 
 possible, and where one is uienti(med as 
 denying that there is a God, he is de- 
 nounced as a fool. 
 
 True to these necessary assumptions, 
 the Bible, everywhere, assumes that man is 
 a Theist. It is thus true to man's history 
 uixm the earth. Man could not be a poly- 
 thoist without believing in God, any more 
 than a man could believe in the multipli- 
 cation table without believing in a unit. 
 Man could not even be an idolator without 
 believing in God, for an idol would have 
 no meaning, unless it were taken to be a 
 God, or to represent a God.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 25 
 
 Upon these essential assumptions the 
 Bible states that nature is alive with the 
 idea of Ood; so nature is represented as 
 declarin^i the glory of God, showing- His 
 handiwork, and manifesting His eternal 
 power and God head. It does not say that 
 these can be inferred from nature by a 
 process of reasoning, but that they are 
 direct anil immediate commuuicaLious 
 from nature — God's nature to man, God's 
 soil. Fi-om I lie l*»ible standpoint, an argu- 
 ment to prove the existence of God is an 
 unnecessary impertinence. 
 
 Think of a man arguing to i>ro\«' that 
 llie sun shines! The sun proves itself hy 
 a direii apjienl to man. 
 
 Hence, lli«' Uilih' simply proceeds to 
 make (iod more I'lilly known lo man, ami 
 this involves tin- idea that man ran lest 
 r«'\clalion. Arcording to the j'.ible, man is 
 (lod's son. r'lwun this slaniip<tinl we 
 should expect lli:il more spncr :in<l ronsid- 
 eriilion woiilij he L:i\-en to 111:111 lli:in to all 
 other subjects, and that all other snbjects
 
 26 TJie Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 should be viewed principally as they are 
 related to man. One line is devoted to 
 makinji- the stars, "lie made the stars, 
 also." Details are j>iven in relation to 
 makino- man. The earth is exalted as 
 man's home, above the remainder of the 
 universe. This is as it should be. Breath- 
 ing space on the earth is worth more to 
 man than all the ''milky way." The sun, 
 the moon, the stars, are bodies of lijjjht. It 
 matters not whether they borrow light, or 
 have it in their nature, they give it to man. 
 They ]ierforni uses for him. They are 
 much, besides, but they are mostly man's 
 servants. If they had no relation to man, 
 thev would have no existence to him. The 
 Bible is written in the assumption that 
 man is the greatest being in this universe. 
 The assumption is true in fact, and must 
 be held true in theory, or man will lose 
 himself in his insignificance* among the 
 
 * Ps., 8 : 3-4. " When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy 
 fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained, what 
 is man, that thou art mindful of him, and the son of man, that 
 thou visitest him?
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 27 
 
 rocks, inquiring their age, or among little 
 bugs with long names, or among the fos- 
 sils. Whether Ave will or not, man, to 
 whom nothing exists which cannot mani- 
 fest itself through his senses or faculties, 
 is the central fact in the universe, and any 
 revelation which should regard him other- 
 wise would be false, and any science which 
 sh(»iild rogjird hi in otherwise is false. The 
 earth, th(^ heavens, the universe, from 
 man's view, were made to serve him. The 
 sun, the moon, an<l stars, shine for him, 
 water Hows, lire burns, llie earth spins, 
 gravity ;itti'aets, grass grows — all things 
 are and <lo loi- hlni. Tliex ni;iy <lo much, 
 besides, ;in<l loi- niiiny ot hei's, but the}^ do 
 these tilings for liini ;is uiucli as if lie were 
 the only i)eing on I lie cjiiili. The scientist 
 seems to iliiiils- tli;it ;i ring ar<Miii(l Saluin 
 is of iiKMt' iiii|)oii iiiicf ilinn nwin. When 
 lie w riles ;i book oC 111:111, he <li\ i<h'S il soiiie- 
 w lull as follows: j<'irst, iiol liing; se<-omlly, 
 juoioj»lasni ; thirdly, evolution; fourthly.
 
 28 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 variations; fiftlil}^, missing links — tlien, 
 after dizzy ages have transpired, man, pro- 
 toplasm plus, and finally dust, nought! 
 
 To man, man is the center and circum- 
 ference of the universe, and a real book of 
 man must recognize this inevitable fact. 
 To man there is nothing ahove him but the 
 One who is in him and of him, as cause 
 and destiny; who can be conceived of as 
 God, only as first conceived of through 
 man. Let a man but really believe that he 
 is a son of God, and systems of worlds are 
 flecks of dirt compared to him. The whole 
 universe waits on man. Man, being able 
 to think and suffer, is of more importance 
 to God than all the dirt, elements, or 
 atoms aside from him, past, present, or 
 future. The Bible was wise when it made 
 man and his home paramount to all else, 
 terrestrial and celestial. That ancient 
 sage* who said that man was made for a 
 
 *Ps..8:5. "For thou hast made him a little lower than the 
 angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honor."
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 29 
 
 little time lo\A'er than the angels, was not 
 on his knees to ought except God. There 
 is naught in the Heavens or in the Deep.? 
 that man can rationalh' prostrate himself 
 before, except the Maker of Man. God did, 
 God should, talk to man as to the son of 
 the King Eternal.
 
 "Is there in us mind and reason, and shall there be no mind 
 elsewhere in the universe? "—Socrates. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 THE TIME DEMON. EVOLUTION. 
 
 What does time do? Nothiug. What is 
 time? Only a hollow somewhat in which 
 things are done. We get down before this 
 Time Demon and worship him. This ap- 
 pears even in our proverbs. Time cures 
 all sorrows; time makes all things even. 
 Empty nonsense! During time all sorrows 
 may be cured by a curer; during time elus- 
 tice may make things even. 
 
 So the scientist is down on his knees 
 before the Time Demon. Grant him but a 
 few cycles of time, and a tad-pole can be- 
 come a man! If the tad-pole has not in 
 him the essential elements of man, all eter- 
 nity can not bring them out. Time is not 
 a cause. Eternitv is not a cause. Time is
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 31 
 
 only that in which causes operate. Time 
 has no more power as cause than space has. 
 The reliance of the evolutionist, however, 
 is on time. Give him time enouoh. Great 
 is time! 
 
 Science Ohjects. 
 
 We will make a brief survey of the ob- 
 jections which science inter])oses to reve- 
 lation. 
 
 Priests of science believe in evolution. 
 Evolution is a word thev emi)l(>v to em- 
 brace several contiictin** theories of the 
 beginnings of tliiniis. First, there is the 
 evolution theory, which assumes an un- 
 known and nnknowable ('ause for the pres- 
 ent order of natiii-e. This unknown and 
 unknowuble Cause is l-iioini to he uiiUnown 
 jind unkno\vai)l('I \\ C liaxc here a conlra- 
 fliclion of terms. The r;ilion.'il i^entlenien 
 who iiohl this ihe(uy |»i()cee»j to inform us, 
 in <h-i;iil, liow ihiH ('ause began, and estab- 
 lished I he universe. They hold, t hei'efore,
 
 32 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 that they Tounc his operations. Next, they 
 tell ns that the operation is based upon an 
 "upward tendenc}/' the lower forms be- 
 coming higher ones; the homogeneous, or 
 simple, becoming heterogeneous, or com- 
 plex; the like diversifying into the unlike. 
 This process has taken incalculable ages to 
 accomplish. According to their theory, 
 the process should continue forever, until 
 the homogeneous protoplasm — whatever 
 that means — becomes <me heterogeneous 
 infinitude, or more. 
 
 Another theory is the same, except that 
 it ai-rests evolution at the threshhold of 
 man. Another is a combination of both 
 theories, and one additional, in that it has 
 no First Cause. In this theory, nothing, a 
 few million years ago, began to evolve a 
 world. Tf nothing did that well, now, that 
 it has intelligence, powc^r, etc., to co-oper- 
 ate with, it should end by making God, and 
 then many Gods. 
 
 Another theorv is to the effect that
 
 The Bible, and Its Readers. 33 
 
 things chauge, grow, develop; hence 
 change, growth, development, instead of 
 being results, are causes; and we, and that 
 which is and shall come after us, are the 
 effects of the causes; ''causes which we 
 see constantly in operation around us." 
 
 (Jraiit ihat man exists; grant that that 
 which testifies to the existence of man is 
 not, in its root, a lie; that is, grant that 
 you are not a delusion and a cheat, it fol- 
 lows: 
 
 1. That man is eternal- -never began, 
 and never will cease; or, 
 
 2. TliMt liefore lie w;is, he made iiiin- 
 self; or, 
 
 :>. Thill iiKiii was Uiade by the First 
 Cause. 
 
 The liisi |)io|»()sili()ji I will no! al tempt 
 to exphiiTi. Ft is one theory of <lo(l. The 
 He<M»ii(l one is colli ladictory ami impossible. 
 The thii<l i>iie is left Uw r:ilinii:il minds. 
 Exi-lise IIS hecillise wc ;i(<epl I he lliird 
 proposition. I»etweeii Uiiill ;is eleriml, botli
 
 34 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 as to past and future, and man as nothing 
 creating himself, and as to man being made 
 by the Eternal, we accept the last hypothe- 
 sis. 
 
 Rollimj away a Stone. 
 
 It is presumed that man is here! For 
 all practical purposes, man can be fully 
 studied without any reference to his origin. 
 If it could be demonstrated that man began 
 in protoplasm, he would require the same 
 food, clothing, shelter, education, etc., that 
 he does now. If chemists could make proto- 
 plasm and start it on its way to evolve a 
 man, when the man arrived, after count- 
 less ages, or after twenty-four hours, he 
 would be the same creature. He would be 
 man. The laws by which man, as an indi- 
 vidual, or as a community, must be gov- 
 erned in his relations to the universe, are 
 just the same upon any theory of his ori- 
 gin, supposed or supposable. If we believe 
 an utter absurdity, as that man, before he 
 had any existence, said to himself "Be,"
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 35 
 
 and thus became man as he is, would still 
 be the same for all purposes of science. 
 Nay, even the question of what relation he, 
 who became, sustains to him who said "Be," 
 man, as a product to man, as a creator, 
 would still remain. 
 
 It requires men having a peculiar gift 
 to dispute, in hot terms, about ithe age of a 
 skull, while indifferent to the moanings of 
 pain all around them; to dispute whether 
 a splinter from a rock is 50,000, or 50,000,- 
 000 years old, while undisturbed by the 
 march of famine and pestilence. Peace! 
 There are skulls with brains in them that 
 demand attention. Peace! It is the same 
 splinter, under any theory, or under none. 
 
 Let man and the earth be accepted as 
 facts; it is not necessary to have a theory 
 of creation in order to love man and serve 
 him, nor to make the earth minister to his 
 good. Wliether man asks for br<^'n(l for 
 body or mind, it can be given witiiout lirst 
 stopping to roll away a stone from the 
 tomb of the past.
 
 36 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 Here is man with great needs, none of 
 whieli can be supplied by studying liini as 
 protoplasm. The Bible presents man to us 
 as man. The sight presents him the same. 
 A glance at man's history shows man suc- 
 ceeding man, as far back as the Eternal. 
 No one can see a break in the procession. 
 This is not studying man with an hypothe- 
 sis. The last look vou can take is of a man 
 in the form of man. 
 
 First and last, therefore, the Bible view 
 of the physical man is that which attests 
 itself to the universal history of man. It is 
 not an hypothesis. It is demonstrable 
 fact. 
 
 "No man liveth to himself." 
 
 A world of mere phenomena, all events 
 bound together by an inflexible law of 
 cause and effect, is a dead machine. The 
 human heart, which must not be left out in 
 the consideration of any subject affecting 
 man, refuses to believe in a universe with- 
 out purpose and will.
 
 "It is as easy to close the eyes of the mind as those of the 
 
 body."— BUTLEB. 
 
 CHAPTEK HI. 
 
 THE AFTEK-DIXNEK THEOEY. 
 
 It is (((needed and deplored bj the Tem- 
 ple and t he ( 'hnicii, that there is a growing 
 disbelief in the Bible. A favorite explana- 
 tion ((f the fact is that this is due to sin. 
 To many peoyde, sin, instead of itself need- 
 ing explanation, explains all mysteries, 
 even accounting for the pangs and death 
 of all aninijils, i\u well as man. 
 
 'riicic is ii(» sill U)\- wliicli any man needs 
 reject llic I>il)l(' l(» (•(Miiiiiil, lor llicrc is no 
 sin that is not (((iiiiiiit led by bclicNcrs in 
 the F'.iltlc. Allot lici- explanation is, that 
 tlieic is ;i coiillict between science and tlie 
 I'ible. In ;i subHefpieiit chapter this will 
 be ex])laine(l. In the meantime, snllice it 
 to say that there is no con Hid between the
 
 38 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 real Bible and real science. The conflict 
 is on false issues. 
 
 A third explanation is, that the Bible 
 gives unworthy views of God, which offend 
 the moral sense of man, and will offend it 
 more and more as his moral sense devel- 
 opes. 
 
 The after-dinner theory of inspiration, 
 that every sentence, word, syllable, and 
 letter in the Bible, is the word of God, from 
 His Throne, is largely responsible for the 
 rejection of the whole Bible. That foolish 
 theory maintains that one must accept the 
 whole Bible as the Word of God, or reject 
 it all. No sane man believes, or can be- 
 lieve, that all the Bible is inspired. There 
 are falsehoods in the Bible, words of bad 
 men, and even of good men in bad moods. 
 Hence, the man who still believes is com- 
 pelled to reject the after-dinner theory. 
 Many people never make a revision of their 
 belief, but steadily scorn the whole book. 
 This theory of inspiration is the fertile 
 parent of infidels, atheists, and agnostics.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 39 
 
 A careful analysis of the arguments of 
 "infidels" against the Bible will show that 
 they are based on a high conception of the 
 character of God. The thought of an eter- 
 nal hell made Col. Ingersoll frantic; the 
 same thought made Jonathan Edwards re- 
 joice. (The mistake Mr. Ingersoll made, 
 is in not appreciating the joy to the 
 Edwards' minds, of which class there are 
 many.) AY hen any doctrine hurts a man, he 
 will let go of it. 
 
 The fact that God can reveal himself to 
 man at all, presupposes that man can un- 
 derstand the revelation, and is capable of 
 recognizing libels against His character. 
 Besides, the Bible cnnlalns hif/h revelations 
 of Ills (itfrihiitrs, wliicli contradict the mon- 
 strosities t(» which we have referred. 
 
 Tlinr (Joiicrjtlions oj Hod. 
 
 'I'licrc ;iif ihi-cc gciK'i-Jil ((mccptioiis of 
 God. 'riK'i'c is llic ((luccittidii lliiit Ih' is mii 
 eiil;ii';:<'<l m;iii, liulitinii i''>i' us w luii \vc ;in*
 
 40 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 his friomls, and against ns when we are his 
 enemies. He seel^.s liis will, and the only 
 law lie recognizes is to do what i)leases 
 him. He is very easily displeased. Those 
 who accept this conception can readily be- 
 lieve that if a man is a friend of snch a 
 God, he may deceiA^e man, cheat, lie, even 
 murder, and say he was commanded by 
 God to do so; he may do any crime in the 
 universe, and say that God approves it, 
 provided the crime be committed against 
 an enemy of (Jod. This is the God that 
 tells a man t<» kill his son, and w^hen the 
 man has become the murderer of his son 
 in intent, can change the fact, and prevent 
 its outward expression. He catches a goat 
 in a thicket as a substitute. But he must 
 have blood — he loves the smell of blood. 
 He sees the bleeding victim, and takes 
 pleasure in its agony. He can take pleas- 
 ure in the death pangs of doves and lambs. 
 He is simply the hnihil (iikI iiiiirdrroiis in- 
 stbictfi (jf iiKDi, icrUlcii hirye, and JairlcHa, and 
 powm'fiiJ.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 41 
 
 He is restrained only by lack of power. 
 People having iron iluiriots are too strong 
 for him. iJmlges, 1:19.) That is, he dies 
 when civilization sets in. He is still the 
 God of the savaj»e American Indian; of 
 tlie Cherokees and Cherokee preachers. 
 With refinement (tf ci-iielty borderin<i- on 
 the iutinite, some <-oiK-eive this (lod to have 
 a t»»rtiivo hoh^ for his enemifs in the eter- 
 nities. 
 
 Conceiving; that this creatnre is the God 
 revealed by the Bible, men of heart reject 
 this liooU. Iff is not the (Jod of the Bible. 
 Man, in his Ithickcst and urossest moods, 
 nja(h* t ins iioi'i<tr. W Im-h iti:iii is sci on lii*e 
 witli lyiii^, thcli, lust, lialo, and war, he 
 (•an?iot r»'\c;il (lod. I0\ <'r\ l liiiii; In- says of 
 (iod iJK'ii is Caisc, lihchiiis, hlaspliciiKnis. 
 
 '1. 'i'hcK' is I he coll (Opt ion thai (lod is a 
 fjiilinc. lie iindcrlook lo make iinin in His 
 inia;;«', foi" iiian's i;o(id :iiid His ^lory. This 
 ima<;o of Cod f<-ll (.n i h<' first ('iiconn(«'r 
 with evil. This liist man fell as easily as
 
 42 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 2iTiy man. No man ever fell before he was 
 encountered by temptation. No man could 
 fall into temptation before he was tempted. 
 Well did Paul say of Adam, that he was of 
 the earth earthy. Then, either God did not 
 succeed in making man in His image, or 
 the image of God is not what it is supposed 
 to be. The conception of God as a failure 
 is not in the first chapter of Genesis. In 
 the third chapter the Creator is repre- 
 sented as having made man, issued him 
 commands, which man broke. The Creator 
 cursed man, the ground, the serpent, all 
 concerned. Grant, with some commenta- 
 tors, that the ground was cursed for man's 
 good. This recognizes the necessity of the 
 curse, only shifting its purpose. The fact 
 is, that the Creator here is represented as 
 disappointed, angry, defeated, at least tem- 
 porarily. Suppose He promised that man 
 would issue in final triumph. This proph- 
 ecy cannot come to pass if sin is not 
 utterly destroyed. If God did not purpose
 
 Tlie Bible and Its Readers. 43 
 
 sin, something has happened contrary to 
 His purpose. Suppose, then, that God does 
 promise triumph over the serpent. This 
 promise is of no importance if the serpent 
 can defeat God. If the serpent overthrew 
 God's plans for one instant, he was the su- 
 perior of God for that instant. There was 
 then no God, for the serpent was upon the 
 Throne ruling man, defeating God. If the 
 serpent was ever the superior, the victor 
 over God, he will always be, for God 
 changes not! This is Serpent Worship. 
 This leaf is no part of the Hebrew Scrip- 
 tures. It is false to the whole tenor of 
 those Scriptures. No where else is it ev«Mi 
 intimated that tiie Eternal (lod is in a los- 
 ing contlicl with a serpent, or that lie is 
 endeavoring to i-ecovej* gronnd already 
 lost. This h-af floated in I'l'om an outside 
 tradition. No ingenuity of man, whether 
 the story be taken literally, mystically, or 
 allegorieally, can show that it does not |)iit 
 man as a battlefield, whereon Evil is ti-i-
 
 44 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 iimphant, without valid reason to believft 
 that it will ever be otherwise than triumph- 
 ant. It is the worship of Evil. It is the 
 religion of China. 
 
 3. There is the scientitie conception of 
 God. His master is Law. It is unchange- 
 able. It made nature, or it is nature. God 
 is chained and gagged, and helpless. He is 
 not even large enough to be chained. He 
 is tied up with pack thread, and cannot 
 break a thread of it. He cannot make a 
 puff of wind only as Law permits him to 
 do so. If Law says, "take some jelly, work 
 cycles of time and make man," by so say- 
 ing Law galvanizes a sort of life into this 
 baby God, and He goes mechanically to 
 work, moving as Law leads IJim. 
 
 The first chapter of thp Bible stands God 
 above and out of Nature, making the uni- 
 verse with as much ease as a boy blows 
 soap bubbles. That God is worth some- 
 thing. He spoke the world into existence 
 for man, and he will look it into nothing-
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 45 
 
 ness if it ever gets in man's waj. He can 
 make evil to serve Him, out of the darkness 
 bringing- light, out of its bitterness bring- 
 ing the sweetness of sympathy and the 
 healing of mercy; revealing Himself more 
 fully because of evil, and when He is done 
 making it serve man, lie can throw it in 
 the face of the sun and burn it like a gnat.
 
 "To love truth, for truth's sake, is the principal part of hu- 
 man perfection in this world, and the seed plot of all other vir- 
 tues."'— Locke. 
 
 CHAPTEK IV. 
 
 GOSPEL TEADITIONS. 
 
 The popular use of the word Bible, 
 means a translation in the vernacular; but 
 all modern standard translations of the 
 Bible contain things that are not at all in 
 the originals, which are mistaken for a 
 part of the Bible. For instance, the open- 
 ing words in the English Bible are, "The 
 first book of Moses called." These are an 
 interpolation, without any authority in the 
 original. These, together with "The sec- 
 ond book of Moses called." "The third 
 book of Moses called." "The fourth book 
 of Moses called." "The fifth book of Moses 
 called" — all interpolations, are commonly 
 understood to mean that the Bible claims
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 47 
 
 that Moses was the author of these five 
 books. The Bible makes no such claim. 
 Tradition asserts these books to Moses; 
 but the validity of a tradition is one thing, 
 and the validitv of a claim made bv the 
 Bible is another thing, quite another! The 
 discussion has been shifted so that unin- 
 formed people believe that an attack on the 
 Mosaic authoritv of the Bible is virtuallv 
 an attack on the Bible. 
 
 In the margin of the English Bible cre- 
 ation is dated B. C. 4004. Geology has at- 
 tacked this date snccossfnlly. Mnuy have 
 thought tliat lliis attack sweeps away the 
 Tiiblc. 1 1 does not tonch the Bible. There 
 are no clii'oiiologicjil notes in the margin 
 of the oi'igijiui liiblc. 
 
 The roferonccs ;i, b, r, d, clc, in (he Eng- 
 lish Bil>le, are no |>ail of tlie liibie. Occa- 
 sionally a reference has some bearing ni)on 
 a text, bn< nsnsilly lliey are mislesiding. 
 
 It is Inie I lull I lie originals, llieinselves, 
 diflV'i' in iiKiiiy phices. These different
 
 48 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 readiugs do, iu some cases, affect the sense, 
 but ill no case do they alTect the central 
 thought of the Bible, that God is, that man 
 is his creature, and that God is in the des- 
 tiny of man. 
 
 It puzzles many to understand why there 
 are so many disagreements regarding the 
 teachings of the Bible among scholarly and 
 pious men, who are quite certain, each for 
 himself, and not one for the other, that 
 his views are exclusivelv au<l authorita- 
 tively taught in the "■Infallible Book." 
 Little disagreements are becoming more 
 and more ignored, not settled, as the com- 
 mon sense of mankind conies to the rescue, 
 as to feet washing, ornaments, hats on or 
 off during service, the color and texture of 
 priestly robes, the style of hair to be worn, 
 singing hymns or psalms, the use of instru- 
 ments of music in divine worship, the pos- 
 ture of the body in public prayers. Ink is 
 still shed copiously by some on these top- 
 ics, but bones are not now broken, nor 
 human blood spilled.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 49 
 
 However, there are fundamental differ- 
 ences among recognized Bible expounders 
 regarding the teachings of the Bible on 
 mighty subjects and vast problems. Is 
 God a person, two persons, three persons? 
 How many Gods are there? Is there a 
 Goddess also? The mother of God? Have 
 the plans of God failed? Will they fail 
 eternally? Or are plans being carried out 
 according to decrees which go so hard with 
 the majority- of mankind? Or will all be 
 saved finally? Is Satan a person, a prin- 
 ciple, a personification of evil? Well, 
 about evil, how did it come? When? In 
 a pre-existent state? Who is to blame for 
 it? Is Satan more than a match for Deity? 
 Will lie have the lion's share wiicn the 
 spoils if battle are divided? Is man free, 
 or necessitated? Is man save<l by faith 
 alone? by failli .in<l works? by (lie de- 
 crees of (!(»(!? Is Jesus (io<l liimsclf? or 
 ecjiiai with (iod? oi- onc-tliiid pari «»f the 
 Trinitv? or riod-man? or man-God? or
 
 50 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 mere man? Is the spirit entitled to the 
 pronoun he? or it? Is the Bible the voice 
 of God from His Throne, in every text, sen- 
 tence, word, syllable, and letter? or does it 
 contain the word of God? Is it inspired 
 in streaks? Does it teach all worth know- 
 ing about religion and science? or about 
 religion only? What is the meaning of 
 death, heaven, hell, paradise? How many 
 states after death? One, two, three? What 
 day of the week is the Sabbath? Does "to 
 create" mean to make out of nothing? or 
 to form out of pre-existing elements? Has 
 man a soul? Is it immortal? Is not im- 
 mortality conditional? What about the 
 resurrection of the body? 
 
 None will dispute that the Churches 
 teach conflicting doctrines. That each sect 
 denies that the other teaches the whole 
 counsel of God; but modestly — so mod- 
 estly — claims to do so itself. Each claims 
 its doctrines are in the Bible. If we sum- 
 marize this judgment of the sects, they tes-
 
 Tlie Bible and Its Headers. 51 
 
 tifj as a whole, that the Bible teaches 
 different and conflicting doctrines. Now, 
 if each sect is doing its best to understand 
 and teach the Bible, the Bible is either the 
 most difficult book possible to be under- 
 stood, or it dot's teach conflicting doctrines. 
 To say that the sects are not doing their 
 best, is to impeach human nature in its 
 best representatives. The Jewish Sect, the 
 Roman Sect, the Anglican Sect, the Lu- 
 theran Sect, contain the best and wisest 
 men in the world. It is not true that any of 
 them are willfully misteaching the Bible. 
 It is impossible for us to escape the conclu- 
 sion that the Bible contains conflicting doc- 
 trines. Some ol the wisest and best men 
 On o.'irth conscientiously hold dottrincs 
 which conflict witli \\\\;\\ others of the 
 wisest and best conscientiously hold, and 
 they all cite texts. Some ol' these men 
 would go to I he slJiKe. Men h;ive gone ex- 
 iiltingly to death foi- cerliiiii <l(»ctrines; 
 others hnve gone ns exnltingly for opposite
 
 52 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 doctriues. They all glorified in their 
 knowledge of the truth until flames licked 
 up their lives. 
 
 How often do we meet professors of 
 Christianity, who, more like gladiators 
 than followers of the meek and lowlv 
 Prince of Peace, contend about the dot of 
 a letter, or the use of a preposition, as if 
 the whole world depended upon the result. 
 It cannot be denied that some of the wisest 
 and best men on the earth conscientiously 
 hold doctrines which are irreconcilable 
 Avith the doctrines of others who are their 
 equals in every particular, and that each 
 party especially affirms that its doctrines 
 are according to the Word of God. What 
 does this mean? It means that the Bible 
 actually contains the main doctrines of 
 both parties. 
 
 Any doctrine is the Word of God which 
 lifts man out of subjection to the flesh, out 
 of bondage to sin, out of "fear that hath 
 torment," into wise and loving service of
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 53 
 
 man, and into fellowship with the Beauti- 
 ful, the Wise, the Merciful, and the Good. 
 
 Since the minds of men perceive from so 
 many points of view, that book is the 
 holiest and wisest which, so to speak, best 
 adapts itself to the angels of vision, reflect- 
 ing the view which each person most needs 
 in order to poise his soul and make him 
 strong to conquer self. I believe the Bible 
 is that kind of book.
 
 "Prove all things; hold fast to that which is good."— Paul. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 DIFFERENT THEORIES OF INSPIRATION. 
 
 Only a cursory inspection of the Bible is 
 required to find that it claims that Two 
 Voices talk to man ; one, the Voice of God, 
 the other the Voice of Evil. The Voice of 
 God is represented as speaking truths, to 
 be believed and obeyed; the Voice of Evil 
 as speaking falsehoods, to be disbelieved 
 and disobeyed. Not only are the Two 
 Voices represented as speaking directly to 
 man, but the Voice of God is represented 
 as speaking through good men to man, and 
 the Voice of Evil as speaking through evil 
 men to man. It is apparent that the say- 
 ings of good men should not be classified 
 with the sayings of evil men. The lies of 
 evil men — there are many of them in the 
 Bible — are given to be rejected.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 55 
 
 From this paragraph and the preceding 
 one, it follows necessarily that there are 
 many things in the Bible which man must 
 disbelieve and disobey, or suffer the conse- 
 quences; that there are, and must be, in 
 the nature of the case, essential and funda- 
 mental contradictions in the Bible, and 
 that there is an Inspiration of Good, and 
 an Inspiration of Evil in the Bible. 
 
 We now present Paul as a careful 
 thinker of the Scriptures. He defines the 
 Holy Scriptures to be "Every Scripture in- 
 spired by God, and profitable for doctrine, 
 for reproof, for conviction, for instruction 
 in righteousness." (2 Tim., 3:1G.) This 
 <lelinition commends itself to reason, and 
 is, withal, jiractical. That Scripture is 
 holy, is God-breathed, wliicii brings ;i man 
 into communion witii the Father, and into 
 loving service of man. Tins dcfiiiitioii was 
 ])enned prior 1<» Ihc comjtosition <»! a hirge 
 l)art of I lie New Testament, bill ii is the 
 stateiDent of a i)rincipl<' whidi is tru<' for
 
 56 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 all time. That Scripture is unholy, uuin- 
 spiretl, which causes a man to ignore God 
 and to wrong man; it is from evil, its root 
 lays hold on dense darkness, and its fruits 
 are bitterness of soul. 
 
 This rule is simple, and can be tested. It 
 is presuu^ed by us that the converse of the 
 definition is so plain that Paul did not 
 think it necessary to state it. Every Scrip- 
 ture that is not profitable for doctrine, for 
 reproof, etc., is not Inspired by God. 
 
 Then it follows that the Scriptural idea 
 of truth, as Paul understood it, if we under- 
 stand him aright, is not in the verbal 
 phraseology, but in the power to quicken 
 the life of God in the soul of man. 
 
 A thing may be literally false, and yet 
 quite true in this sense. For instance, 
 "The heavens declare the glory of God," is 
 literally an impossibility, yet they do give 
 us an idea of the glory of God, wliich we 
 feel to be true. The heavens tell the glory 
 of God as a flower tells of beauty. The
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 57 
 
 world manifests the eternal power and 
 Godhead of the Deity as the sun manifests 
 light. 
 
 Grant that God has made a written 
 revelation to man. It must have been 
 written in human language, and according 
 to man's view of things. Then physical 
 facts will liav«' been communicated accord- 
 ing to their forms, or appearances. 
 
 »S'o/A/e Simplr TniiJis about LaiKjHagc. 
 
 It is impossible to speak or write even 
 one intelligent sentence concerning God, 
 without using woi'ds wliich a])ply ])ri- 
 marily to man, or the world. Only those 
 who have never considered lliis proi)osition 
 think that tliis necessary use of words by a 
 speaker or writer proves that he believes 
 that God is man, matter, oi- force. Ne\<*r- 
 thelcss, a lai'ge libi'ary wouhl l»e i-iMinind 
 to contain all the bo(>ks which li;i\c Imm-u 
 I»nblishe<l contending otherwise. Not only 
 is it necessary to s|>«'al< oi- write of <lod in
 
 58 IThe Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 words primaril}' applicable to man, or the 
 world, but it is necessary to speak or write 
 of all other subjects in the same manner. 
 Whether we will or not, man is the center 
 of thought conception and language, and 
 all things are more or less humanized in 
 our conceptions and utterances. We can- 
 not communicate a thought relative to the 
 world without using words which have and 
 can have no meaning apart from the senses 
 and faculties of man. Not only, therefore, 
 is God humanized in thought, conception, 
 and forms of expression, but all other sub- 
 jects are likewise so humanized. Take the 
 simplest idea in the world, according to the 
 materialistic dictum of things, to wit: 
 Force. What does man know? What can 
 he say of Force, except as it impresses him 
 through his senses and faculties? 
 
 Write the shortest possible sentence of 
 God. God is. Both these words have, pri- 
 marily, reference to human language, 
 which is based and rooted in man's senses
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 59 
 
 and faculties. Attempt to put an intelli- 
 gible meaning- in God, and you begin to 
 give it "power," of which you could have 
 no conception without your muscular and 
 nervous systems, and your will. You now 
 add, say, "wisdom." What would you 
 know of wisdom without relating it to the 
 operation of mind? You add, say, "good- 
 ness," "love." I'hese all have no base of 
 meaning to man apart from a foundation 
 in man. 
 
 Take "is." Does it mean exists? Plainly 
 it is rooted in uinu, and tlie world. Does 
 "(lod is" imi)ly what? Then the answer 
 to "what?" carries ahing more ideas, which 
 wecouhl not even have without being what 
 we are. 
 
 Whih' it is tnie, ;is staled in the opening 
 sentence, it is ;ils(» trne Ihjit if ;ni jnithor 
 j)hiinly shows that lie intends to liniil liis 
 mesining to the lirsl nse oC woids, he innst 
 he held to leach that <!o(l is man, or mat- 
 ter, or force. iJut no anllior should be held
 
 60 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 to such a view except on his own showing, 
 by his limit.ation of words to their primary 
 signification. It is manifestly unfair for 
 one to maintain that the use of words im- 
 plying seeing, hearing, etc., should always 
 be used in their first sense. That people 
 Icnow better is evident from the fact that 
 they do not accuse one who speaks of na- 
 ture as seeing, hearing, etc., of believing 
 that nature has human eyes, ears, etc. 
 
 The question arises, could God, even if 
 He took a pen in His hand and wrote every 
 word of the Bible, set Himself down clearly 
 and fully in it? Is it large enough to con- 
 tain the Infinite? Is human language in 
 one book, or in all books, capable of ex- 
 pressing the Absolute and Limitless One? 
 If human language is finite, imperfect, it 
 cannot reveal the Infinite perfectly. Since 
 man and nature are also both finite, they 
 lie under the same disability. There is as 
 much ohsciirity, imprrfrcfions, and so-called 
 contradictions, in vuiii <rnd nature as in the 
 written revelations of (rod.
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 61 
 
 For example, no mau can reconcile the 
 tooth and claw of a lion with the tooth and 
 hoof of a sheep. 
 
 We stand in the presence of mystery, 
 with or without the Bible. Do you say that 
 sin explains such divergent texts of nature? 
 The answer is easy. First, sin itself needs 
 explanation; secondly, sin has not changed 
 the tooth and claw of the lion. Do you say 
 that sin brouglit suli'ering and death into 
 the world? It is not true. Even if it were 
 true, why sJioUld man's sin inflict suffering 
 ;nid dcjitli ni)on beasts, that arc iiicai)able 
 of sin? The answer is still easier. The lion 
 himself sulTcrs jiaiii and death, and his en- 
 joyment should iiol be cousicb'rcd alone. 
 Wlial about tiic pain of iiis victim? Men 
 writf glibly of tlic ;nI;i])t;itioTi tlic jtroof 
 of wisdom in il of I lie ciirniNcrons licast 
 to seize and kill its |)i'<'y, but o\ei'lo(d< the 
 wjint of ;i<l;i|il;ilion in 1 he prev (o protect 
 itself. Do yon sa,\ that snffeiing ;ind deiith 
 are essenti;il to preveni I lie "oecnicincy of
 
 62 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 the world bj the lower orders of exis- 
 ence?" The statement is flatly denied. 
 Vegetables are removed without pain. It 
 is conceivable that the sheep might have 
 been so made, as when the crisis came to 
 enjoy being eaten as much as his eater en- 
 joys eating him. Do you answer, finally, 
 that the capacity to enjoy pleasure carries 
 with it the capacity to suffer pain? The 
 answer is. You haA'^e placed pleasure and 
 pain, in the nature of things, where they be- 
 long, and have dropped sin as the cause of 
 pain and death. 
 
 If we have shown that nature has its 
 mysteries also, we are ready to proceed, 
 merely intimating that mysteries which 
 exist in nature are not aitributed to the Bible 
 by candid and thom/htful people. The Bible 
 has imported no mystery into the universe, 
 but it is an attempt to explain mystery. 
 
 Suppose that Ciod could and did write 
 himself down fully in the Bible, has man 
 the capacity to understand the writing?
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 63 
 
 Yes? Then what is the meaning of the 
 Babel among the Sects? 
 
 It is patent that in order for one to as- 
 sert that there is a conflict between the 
 utterance of any bool^ in regard to facts, 
 and the utterance of nature in regard to 
 the same facts, one must understand what 
 both the books and nature aflirni in the 
 premises. While it may be safely held that 
 it is a difficult thing for one person to 
 understand the allegations of the Bible re- 
 garding facts, it may be safely held that it 
 is a more ditticult thing for one person to 
 understand the allegations of the Bible 
 thereon (utd the allegations of nature. 
 
 The theologinii may pretend to know 
 much, but the priest of science pretends to 
 know VMslh' more. Tlio Itihlc is :i l;ir<re 
 subject. The Bildc and Nature m hirger 
 subject. It is possible one may make a 
 mistnko in bolh, not to sny in cither. It is 
 certjiiii lh;il I he I'ihic brings no new dilTi 
 cnlty into hnnjan thought or conception.
 
 64 The Bible and lis Readers. 
 
 The orij>iii of the universe? the nature and 
 destiny of man? God? who? what? where? 
 how many? are fundamental problems, 
 and they exist where there is no letter of 
 the Bible. 
 
 There is as much difference between the 
 tooth of a lion and the tooth of a sheep, 
 viewed singly, as between any two texts in 
 the Bible. That speaks of blood, the inflic- 
 tion of suffering, savageness; this of peace, 
 the reception of suffering. No one makes 
 the mistake, however, of denying the ex- 
 istence of either tooth. The earth is full 
 of discordant texts. It puzzles the wise to 
 relate them harmoniously. To intimate 
 that the sin of man has changed the tooth 
 of the lion is absurd. Whether or not man 
 sinned, the lion would tear flesh and eat 
 suffering victims, ^^iiffering, itself, is a 
 mystery. 
 
 Wise or unwise, the Bible claims to be 
 an effort to explain these matters. In 
 thought, strike the Bible into nothingness.
 
 The Bible and lis Readers. 65 
 
 You are yet there with your past, present, 
 future, and the world is yet there, and God 
 yet is, or Not is! We protest with all our 
 might against any one attributing to the 
 Bible problems that exist in the nature of 
 things. 
 
 \
 
 " A wise man will weigh evidence the more carefully, the 
 more important the subject."— Whatkly. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 LET THE FACT STAND. 
 
 Beresliitli is the first word in the Bible. 
 It is translated "In the beginning," instead 
 of "In beginning." The difference between 
 the two conceptions is vast. That refers to 
 time, this to action; that seems to justify 
 people in hunting a date, this gives an ex- 
 cuse for such useless and fruitless work. 
 It was that erroneous "the" which led 
 Usher to cipher, and his poor ciphering is 
 responsible for the date affixed to creation 
 in the English Bible B. C. 4004. Some men 
 seem to think that the Bible is responsible 
 for the date, and that Geology has im- 
 pugned the Bible, when it has impugned 
 only an interpolation. Little did those men 
 who wrote "bereshith" dream that "how
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 67 
 
 old is the earth?" would become a vital 
 question. 
 
 It is philosophically possible that matter 
 is only a various form of force; but the 
 Bible does not say so, nor attempt to give 
 the hotr of its genesis any more than the 
 ivht'ii. A wise book, this Bible! If it had 
 said absolutely that matter was created 
 out of nothing, these objectors would have 
 had reasons satisfactory to themselves to 
 reject it; if it had said absolutely that mat- 
 ter was not created out of nothing, men 
 who thought that ought to be the mode of 
 creation, would have had difficulties to en- 
 count«'i-. Hence, as a fact, the Bible says 
 nothing (h'cisively on the subject. It stead- 
 ily avoids raising nnnecessary (juestions. 
 If unnecessary questions be raised by the 
 human inffllect, it leaves tliem un- 
 answered. 
 
 Tlic learned id I iis lliai b'reshitli is a 
 substantive rcmiiiiiK' with rcmininc termi- 
 nation //// — prefix b root, nisli. Tlic word
 
 68 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 heads, in (Gen., 2: 10) is the plural of rosh; 
 and the primary idea of rosh is motion. It 
 is evident that Usher was misled by the 
 "the" in the English Translation. 
 
 "In beginning" refers to action, not to 
 time. There was neither tick of clock, beat 
 of pulse, nor ebb of tide, by which to com- 
 pute time. 
 
 "In beginning" simply means commenc- 
 ing. Whether the earth w^as made 6,000 or 
 6,000,000 years ago, is of no vital impor- 
 tance. It is the same earth; it seeds the 
 same and grows wheat the same, no matter 
 ichen it came from the creative act of God. 
 If the disciples of Usher desire to squabble 
 with the disciples of Lyell as to its age, 
 there is no law except common sense and 
 duty to man against it. 
 
 If the earth's precise age to a day could 
 be ascertained, there would be nothing 
 added to the stock of knowledge but a date. 
 Oh! the little things which disturb man.
 
 "The best preacher is the heart; the best teacher is time; 
 the best book is the world; the best friend is God."— Mishna. 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 There are three views as regards how 
 the Bible should be received. One that the 
 Priests, or Chiirt-h recognized, are the ex- 
 pounders tliereof. Tliis view sets the 
 Priests, or Church, above the Bible. 
 
 The second view is that lavmen have the 
 right, and it is their duty, to compare what 
 the Church tejulies with the Bible, and 
 what 111*' liible savs is authoritative. This 
 view sets the Bible u]) above man. 
 
 The third view is that man has the right, 
 and it is liis duty, !<» .judge I lie contents of 
 the ilibh*, wliether they be true or lalsc. 
 Tliis \i('W sets man above the Bilde. 
 
 All ii;iliuiis Ikivi' llicir i'dides, citlu'r 
 oral or writ ten. Time biiiigs I lie idrii of 
 sacredncss, the idea <•!' s;n icdncss blinds 
 manv to faults. TIk-it jirc dilTcifiHcs of
 
 70 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 opinion — honest and intelligent differences 
 of opinion — held bj' thousands as to the 
 real doctrines of the Bible. It is folly to 
 attempt to extinguish reason and stifle 
 conscience by an appeal to a text of any 
 book. If a book teaches what is unreason- 
 able the teaching is false, though it be ac- 
 companied by thunder and threatenings 
 and what not! 
 
 During the history of the Church there 
 have been two parties, one endeavoring to 
 prevent the people reading the Scriptures, 
 which they proclaim to be the Word of 
 God, and the other demanding that the peo- 
 ple read them. The former admits that 
 the Scriptures are difficult to understand, 
 the latter assert that the Scriptures are 
 very plain— that "a wayfaring man, though 
 a fool, need not err therein." We admit, 
 with the former, that the Scriptures are 
 difficult to understand, but we deny that 
 "one faith" means "one doctrine" or "one 
 creed." The root of the word translated
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 71 
 
 faith is obedience, and the idea is of obedi- 
 ence to God's moral laws. There is noth- 
 ing in the Old Testament that warrants 
 the notion that a man is to be saved or 
 damned b}' his opinions, nor in the New 
 Testament. It is, "1 was hungry, and ye 
 fed me," etc. It is not, "You had the true 
 set of dogmas." 
 
 The Bible is not a systematic Theology. 
 Christianity is a life, not a creed! 
 
 The Bible was not given so much to af- 
 fect the head as to inspire the heart; he 
 knows all of it worth knowing who loves 
 (jrod and his neighbor — he knows less than 
 nothing of it wlio hates man. One who 
 was a great teacher viewed from any 
 st.'n)dy)oirit represents rTf)d as judging 
 men, not by their creeds or rituals or no- 
 tions, but by tlicir deeds of kindness and 
 acts of mercy. 
 
 A tendency in man to conceive of (4od is 
 in liwriiionv willi iiian'.s cliaraclcr. Said a 
 Greek satirist, Xenophanes, "Mortals think
 
 72 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 the gods are born and have shape and 
 voice and raiment like themselves." 
 
 According to our view of the Bible, that 
 conception which is best suited to bring you 
 to God will mold you. Possibly you may 
 have first one conception, then another, 
 then another. If you change thus, the 
 Bible will change to you. 
 
 That it is wrong to murder, is true. It is 
 not wrong to murder because the Bible for- 
 bids it, but the Bible forbids it because it 
 is wrong. Kight and wrong existed before 
 the first word of the Bible was written. 
 The utmost that the Bible can do is to re- 
 veal truths. The Bible contains many 
 imperishable and incontestable truths. 
 The question of the authorship, or source 
 of a book, is not the question of the truth 
 if its contents. 
 
 That God should reveal himself to man, 
 is not difficult to believe. The real diffi- 
 culty is not in believing that God has com- 
 municated to man, but that he has ceased
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 73 
 
 to communicate. That God did not reveal 
 himself to man before the time of Moses, 
 or since the time of Malachi, or of John the 
 Evangelist, if accepted, must be accepted 
 by faith alone. That the Bible claims all 
 the revelation of God which lie has made 
 to man, is a dogma which faith alone can 
 receive. No valid human reason can be 
 rendered thereon. 
 
 The Bible wisely leaves vagaries un- 
 touched, and handles essential problems. 
 It is intensely practical. It leaves a man 
 free to accept man as he is, and do some- 
 thing for him. 
 
 The main purpose of the Bible is to affect 
 our lives; to "write the laws of God iu our 
 hearts." The book being mainly concerned 
 about iiow to live arigiil, should touch luau 
 at all points of his natuic The iu:iu who 
 cannot be uiommI \)\ ;i highci- luolivc. Id 
 him be inov(M| l»y a lower one, only lliul he 
 move forwaiTl. There are passages aud in- 
 eidf'Ufs in the T'oolc of Livfs that arc cssen-
 
 74 TJie Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 tial to a full representation of human 
 nature at its lowest phases. These pas- 
 sages and incidents were not given to be 
 read in public, or to Justify the ugliness 
 which they depict. Those who assert that 
 every word in the Bible is meant for pub- 
 lic reading, and the scoffers who assert that 
 low phases of life should not be given, are 
 equally in error. The method of the Jew- 
 ish Church concerning these matters is 
 based upon well established facts, as well 
 as upon common sense. Paul, addressing 
 the "brethren" in a public capacity, takes 
 the same ground. (Phil., 4: 8: 9.) "Finally, 
 brethren, whatsoever things are true, 
 whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever 
 things are just, whatsoever things are pure, 
 w^hatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever 
 things are of good report; if there be any 
 virtue, and if there be any praise, think on 
 these things." 
 
 "Those things which ye have both 
 learned, and received, and heard, and seen
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 75 
 
 in me, do; and the God of peace shall be 
 with you." 
 
 Besides other codes, a nation mnst have 
 its penal code; it must recognize the exist- 
 ence of every crim(^ possible to man; it 
 must define, denounce, and punish— or 
 perish! The penal codes in the Bible arise 
 out of the human effort to deal with man 
 as a (•riminal. The question of the human 
 punishment for a crime against man, is a 
 matter that man has been left to experi- 
 ment with. Of course God sanctions all 
 honest clforts to prevent and punish crime; 
 that Moses meant no more than a general 
 sanction, is ai»])ai('iil w lien lie accepted the 
 views f>f .T«'tlii'o ill the ;i(lniinistration of 
 Justice* ;is against some of wliicli lie lia<l 
 apjuMided tlic naiiK- <»f I lie i>or(l. 
 
 Th«'i(' is iiolliing grajtpliii'r willi llic lif<* 
 of mail llijil is iiiiw (»it liy of holier and syiii- 
 patliy }»y ;ill iIh- Ijcavnis. .Man, though 
 disfigiir<'d sotih-, is y«'l of <1(mI and in liis 
 iniagf*.
 
 76 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 Mau3' beneficial results come to us from 
 the accounts of the wanderings of the 
 Israelites in the wilderness. The divine 
 thought that God is in the human race, is 
 only an expounded form of the thought 
 that God is in one man, or in one race. "Is 
 not one man as dear to the heart of the 
 Father as another?" 
 
 One good result of accepting the story of 
 creation in Genesis, is that it leaves man . 
 free to do something for the good of his 
 fellow beings, while if it should become 
 thought to be a vital question as to just 
 how, or precisely when, the earth was 
 made, there are everlasting problems for 
 men which direct their minds into useless 
 channels of effort. 
 
 How the battle has raged in regard to 
 the authorship of the Pentateuch, and over 
 the account of Moses' death! The one who 
 wrote of the death of Moses was probably 
 some simple minded man, unable to write 
 a book, but able to pour out his soul over
 
 The Bible and Its Readers. 77 
 
 the dead, and touch a tomb with hope and 
 beauty! That the J.ord buried Moses can- 
 not be proved, nor disproved; but the Lord 
 was with him in his last struggle— that is 
 true. That he cared even for the dust of 
 a man gives us a glimpse into the Lord's 
 heart worth more than what all the higher 
 critics, and their friends, the bug-hunters, 
 have said or can say. (L'all this epitaph a 
 note frou) an unknown author. It states 
 as a mailer of fact what man must needs 
 believe, if he would front tlie world without 
 fear oi- tliuching, llial tlx' Loid will be with 
 liis ser\;iiit in liis hist gas]), and will ten- 
 derly regni'd I lie dust from which the spirit 
 has moved on. 
 
 Tlie linie ('((liies t<» :ill wlieil lliev wish tO 
 know llieinselves ;is lliey ai'e, an<l there is 
 only one Hook we Un(»\\ of tli;il lays the 
 humjin lie;iit h;il-e willioul fejir of Ihlttei'V 
 — thai HodI: is lln liihir. It will sift a man, 
 searcli him r)nt, ;nid by f!;isli of fii-e, f)r thun- 
 der pejil, tlinnt, gl(»omy silence, or gentle
 
 78 The Bible and Its Readers. 
 
 whisperings, in some way stir his inward 
 world until he shall want to "lay down 
 arms." It does still more. It declares that 
 God takes him as he is, and will stand by 
 him as long as he gropes upward. 
 
 It is good that the Bible was written for 
 the clinging soul that needs a God In- 
 vincible; for the sturdy, self-willed man 
 who feels strong enough to supplement 
 God in His weakness of will; for the ten- 
 der hearted brother who cannot have peace 
 in his soul with the thought that one is 
 lost. 
 
 If it were written for either of these 
 alone, it would not be a book, but a frag- 
 ment; it would not have represented all 
 the phases of thought, but one phase; it 
 would have been accepted only by those 
 
 » 
 
 whose thought it expressed in clear-cut 
 terms. 
 
 It is the wisest of Books, for the very rea- 
 son that it is the most manv sided. If it 
 encourages your heart to think you may
 
 The Bible and its Readers. 79 
 
 progress forever, that is there; if the 
 weary look forward to a peaceful rest after 
 this fever called "life" is over, that is there; 
 there is no thought good for man or help- 
 ful to him, in any mood, or place, or con- 
 dition, that is not there for him. It is good 
 that the Bible was not made for one creed. 
 God is in the human race, and will stay 
 and help in every effort to rise out of that 
 which hurts, or destroys, or even makes 
 afraid — His children.
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below 
 
 ID 
 UiU. 
 
 JUL 1113T4 
 
 JUL 3^97f 
 
 
 Form L-fl 
 
 0><ir««8ITT cf CALIFORKii^ 
 
 AT
 
 i 
 
 FACILITY 
 
 AA 000 619 782 6
 
 ' ^i^^^^H^^PPIM 
 
 ^