EX vox© Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/exvotoaccountofsOObutlrich Re-issue of the Works of the late Samuel Butler Author of " Erewhon," *' The Way of All Flesh," etc. Mr. Fifield has pleasure in announcing he has taken over the publication of the entire works (with the exception of " Unconscious Memory," which is still out of pfint) of the late Samuel Butler, novelist, philosopher, scientist, satirist and classicist ; **in his own department," says Mr. Bernard Shaw, "the greatest English writer of the latter half of the 19th century." " The Way of All Flesh" and "Erewhon" which have been out of print for some time are now reprinted, and all the other works with one exception are now offered at more popular prices. The Way of All Flesh. A Novel. New Edition. 6s. God the Known and God the Unknown. is. 6d. nett. Erewhon. i ith, Revised Edition. 4th Impression. 2s. 6d. nett. ^a? ti^^ Erewhon Revisited. 3rd Impression, 340 pages. 2s. 6d. nett. Essays on Life, Art and Science. 340 pages. 2s. 6d. nett. (A few copies of the original edition, gilt top, 6s.) The Alps and Sanctuaries of Piedmont and the Canton Ticino. Profusely illustrated by Charles Gogin, H. F. Jones and the Author. Pott 4to, ' fi..,^ cloth gilt, los. 6d. ?cV* The Fair Haven. 5s. nett. Life and Habit. An essay after a completer view of Evolution. 2nd edition. 5s. nett. Evolution, Old and New. A comparison of the theories of Buftbn, Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck, with that of Charles Darwin. 5s. nett. Luck, or Cunning ? As the main means of organic modification. 5s. nett. The Authoress of the Odyssey, who and what she was, when and where she wrote, etc. The Iliad of Homer, rendered into English prose. The Odyssey, rendered into English prose. Shakespeare's Sonnets, with notes and original text. Ex Voto. An account of the Sacro Monte or New Jerusalem at Varallo-Sesia. Selections from Butler's Works. London : A. C. Fifield, 44 Fleet Street, E.G. 5 s. nett. 5s. nett. 5s. nett. 5s. nett, 5s. nett. 5s. nett. Frontispiect4 'IL VECCHIETTO.' By Tabachetti. Ex Voto : An Account of The Sacro Monte or New Jerusalem at Varallo Sesia With some notice of Tabachetti's Remaining Work at the Sanctuary of Crea By Samuel Butler Author of "Life and Habit," "Luck, or Cunning?" " Erewhon," etc. "II n'y a que deux ennemis de la religion — le trop peu, et le trop j et des deux le trop est mille fois le plus dangereux." — UAbbe Mabillon, 1698. Op. 9 ; > . New and Cheaper Issue London : A. C. Fifield All rights resernjed l/ AI VARALLEST E VALSESIANI l'autore RICONOSCENTE. 334323 PREFACE. The illustrations to this book are mainly collo- type photographs by Messrs. Maclure, Mac- donald & Co., of Glasgow. Notwithstanding all their care, it cannot be pretended that the result is equal to what would have been obtained from photogravure ; I found, how- ever, that to give anything like an adequate number of photogravures would have made the book so expensive that I was reluctantly com- pelled to abandon the idea. As these sheets leave my hands, my atten- tion is called to a pleasant article by Miss Alice Greene about Varallo, that appeared in The Queen for Saturday, April 21, 1888. The article is very nicely illustrated, and gives a good idea of the place. Of the Sacro Monte Miss Greene says : — '* On the Sacro Monte the tableaux are produced in perpetuity, only the figures are not living, they are terra-cotta viii PREFACE. Statues painted and moulded in so life-like a way that you feel that, were a man of flesh and blood to get mixed up with the crowd behind the grating, you would have hard work to distinguish him from the figures that have never had life.*' I should wish to modify in some respects the conclusion arrived at on pp. 148, 149, about Michael Angelo Rossetti's having been the principal sculptor of the Massacre of the Innocents chapel. There can be no doubt that Rossetti did the figure which he has signed, and several others in the chapel. One of those which are probably by him (the soldier with outstretched arm to the left of the composition) appears in the view of the chapel that I have given to face page 144, but on con- sideration I incline against the supposition of my text, i.e,, that the signature should be taken as governing the whole work, or at any rate the greater part of it, and lean towards accept- ing the external authority, which, quantum valeat, is all in favour of Paracca. I have changed my mind through an increasing inability to resist the opinion of those who hold that the figures fall into two main groups. PREFACE. ix one by the man who did the signed figure, t,e,, Michael Angelo Rossetti ; and another, comprising all the most vigorous, interesting, and best placed figures, that certainly appears to be by a much more powerful hand. Probably, then, Rossetti finished Paracca's work and signed one figure as he did, without any idea of claiming the whole, and believing that Paracca's predominant share was too well known to make mistake about the authorship of the work possible. I have therefore in the title to the illustration given the work to Paracca, but it must be admitted that the question is one of great difficulty, and I can only hope that some other work of Paracca's may be found which wall tend to settle it. I will thankfully receive information about any other such work. May I, 1888. CONTENTS. CHAP. I. Introduction . II. The Rev. S. W. King— Lanzi and Lomazzo . III. Varallo, Past and Present .... IV. Bernardino Caimi, and Fassola . . V. Early History of the Sacro Monte VI. Preliminary Considerations .... VII. Aim and Scope, of the Sacro Monte VIII. Gaudenzio Ferrari, Tabachetti, and Giovanni D'Enrico IX. The Ascent of the Sacro Monte, and Chapel No. I, Adam and Eve; No. 2, Annunciation No. 3, Salutation of Mary by Elizabeth No. 4, First Vision of St. Joseph X. Chapel No. 5, Visit of the Magi ; No. 6, II Presepio ; No. 7, Visit of the Shepherds No. 8, Circumcision ; No. 9, Joseph Warned to Fly; No. 10, Flight into Egypt; No. ii, Mas sacre of the innocents .... XI. Chapel No. 12, Baptism ; No. 13, Temptation No. 14, Woman of Samaria; No. 15, The Para- lytic; No. 16, Widow's Son at Nain ; No. 17, Transfiguration ; No. 18, Raising of Lazarus ; PAGE I 10 24 38 49 69 80 90 114 132 xii CONTENTS. CHAP. PAGE N9. 19, Entry into Jerusalem ; No. 20, Last Supper ; No. 21, Agony in the Garden ; No. 22, Sleeping Apostles -153 XII. The Palace of Pilate; Chapel No. 23, The Cap- ture OF Christ; No. 24, Christ taken before Annas ; No. 25, Christ before Caiaphas ; No. 26, Repentance of St. Peter ; No. 27, Christ before Pilate ; No. 28, Christ before Herod ; No. 29, Christ taken sack to Pilate ; No. 30, Flagel- lation ; No. 31, Crowning with Thorns ; No. 32, Christ at the Steps of the Pretorium ; No. 33, Ecce Homo ; No. 34, Pilate Washing his Hands ; No. 35, Christ Condemned to Death . . 166 XIII. Mysteries of the Passion and Death ; Chapel No. 36, The Journey to Calvary ; No. 37, Nail- ing OF Christ to the Cross ; No. 38, The Crucifixion 195 XIV. Chapel No. 39, The Descent from the Cross . 214 XV. TheTietX and Remaining Chapels ; Chapel No. 40, The PietX ; No. 41, The Entombment ; Remain- ing Chapels and Chiesa Maggiore . . . 225 XVI. Tabachetti's Work at Crea . . . . .239 XVII. Conclusion 259 INDEX 271 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. For explanation j)f the Asterisk see Advertisement of Photographs at the end of the book. **Il Vecchietto," from the Descent from the Cross (Chapel No. 39) PLATE I. Plan of the Sacro Monte in 167 i II. The Old Adam and Eve . III. Tabachetti's Adam and Eve IV. First Vision of St. Joseph *V. The Massacre of the Innocents . *VI. The Temptation in the Wilderness VII. Caiaphas VIIL Herod IX. Two Laughing Boys .... X. Man in Background of the Flagella tion Chapel XL Stefano Scotto, and Mr. S. Butler *XII. Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary General View to the Right. XIII. Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary St. John and the Madonna with the OTHER Maries. *XIV. Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary Sta. Veronica and Man with Goitre. *XV. Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary The Two Thieves and their Driver. Frontispiece to face page 68 >> 121 » 122 » 130 j> 144 » 154 » 170 » 176 M 177 » 182 ») 189 M 195 196 xiv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE *XVL Gaudenzio Ferrari's Crucifixion . . to face page 203 General View Looking towards the Bad Thief. *XVIL Gaudenzio Ferrari's Crucifixion . . „ 204 General View Looking towards the Good Thief. XVII L Gaudenzio Ferrari's Portraits of Ste- FANO SCOTTO AND LEONARDO DA ViNCI „ 206 XIX. Bernardino de Conti's Drawing of Ste- FANO SCOTTO, AND PROFILE OF LEONARDO DA ViNCI BY HIMSELF (REVERSED) . „ 207 *XX. Gaudenzio Ferrari's Crucifixion . . „ 210 The Bad Thief. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. Unable to go to Dinant before I published " Ex Voto," I have since been there, and have found out a good deal about Tabachetti's family. His real name was de Wes- pin, and he came of a family who had been copper-beaters, and hence sculptors — for the Flemish copper beaters made their own models — for many generations. The family seems to have been the most numerous and important in Dinant. The sculptor's grandfather, Perpete de Wespin, was the first to take the sobriquet of Tabaguet, and though in the deeds which I have seen at Namur the name is always given as " de Wespin," yet the addition of " dit Tabaguet " shows that this last was the name in current use. His father and mother, and a sister Jacquelinne, under age, appear to have all died in 1587. Jean de Wespin, the sculptor, is mentioned in a deed of that date as " expatrie," and he has a "gardien" or ''tuteur," who is to take charge of his inheritance, appointed by the Court, as though he were for some reason unable to appoint one for himself. This lends colour to Fassola's and Torrotti's statement that he lost his reason about 1586 or 1587. I think it more likely, however, considering that he was alive and doing admirable work some fifty years after 1590, that he was the victim of some intrigue than that he was ever really mad. At any rate, about 1587 he appears to have been unable to act for himself. If his sister Jacquelinne died under age in 1587, Jean is not likely to have been then much more than thirty, so we may conclude that he was born about 1560. There is some six or eight years' work by him remaining at Varallo, and described as finished in the 1586 edition of Caccia. Tabachetti, therefore, must have left home very young, and probably went straight to Varallo. In 1586 or 1587 we lose sight of him till 1590 or 1591, when he went to Crea, ii EX VOTO. where he did about forty chapels — almost all of which have perished. On again visiting Milan I found in the Biblioteca Nazionale a guide-book to the Sacro Monte, which was not in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana, and of whose existence I had never heard. This guide-book was published in 1606 and reissued in 16 10; it mentions all changes since 1590, and even describes chapels not yet in existence, but it says nothing about Tabachetti's First Vision of St. Joseph chapel — the only one of his chapels not given as completed in the 1590 edition of Caccia. I had assumed too hastily that this chapel was done just after the 1590 edition of Caccia had been published, and just before Tabachetti left for Crea in 1590 or 1 59 1, whereas it now appears that it was done about 1 6 10, during a short visit paid by the sculptor to Varallo some twenty years after he had left it. Finding that Tabachetti returned to Varallo about 16 10, I was able to understand two or three figures in the Ecce Homo chapel which I had long thought must be by Taba- chetti, but had not ventured to ascribe to him, inasmuch as I believed him to have finally left Varallo some twenty years before the Ecce Homo chapel was made. I have now no doubt that he lent a hand to Giovanni D'Enrico with this chapel, in which he has happily left us his portrait signed with a V (doubtless standing for W, a letter which the Italians have not got), cut on the hat before baking, and invisible from outside the chapel. Signer Arienta had told me there was a seal on the back of a figure in the Journey to Calvary chapel ; on examining this I found it to show a W, with some kind of armorial bearings underneath. I have not been able to find anything like these arms, of which I give a sketch herewith : they have no affinity with those of the de Wespin family, unless the cups with crosses under them are taken as modifications of the three-footed caldrons which were never absent from the arms of Dinant copper-beaters. Tabachetti (for I shall assume that the seal was placed by him) perhaps sealed this figure as an afterthought in 16 10, being unable to cut easily into the hard-baked clay, and if he could have Italianised the W he would probably have done so. I should say that I arrived at the Ecce Homo figure as a portrait of Tabachetti before I found the V cut upon the hat ; I found the V on examining ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. iii the portrait to see if I could find any signature. It stands next to a second portrait of I^eonardo da Vinci by Gaudenzio Ferrari, taken into the Ecce Homo chapel, doubtless, on the demolition of some earlier work by Gaudenzio on or near the same site. I knew of this second portrait of Leonardo da Vinci when I published my first edition, but did not venture to say anything about it, as thinking that one life-sized portrait of a Leonardo da Vinci by a Gaudenzio Ferrari was as much of a find at one time as my readers would put up with. I had also known of the V on Taba- chetti's hat, but, haying no idea that his name was de Wespin, had not seen why this should help it to be a por- trait of Tabachetti, and had allowed the fact to escape me. The figure next to Scotto in the licce Homo chapel is, I do not doubt, a portrait of Giovanni D'Enrico. This may explain the tradition at Varallo that Scotto is Antonio D'Enrico, which cannot be. Next to Giovanni D'Enrico stands the second Leonardo da Vinci, and next to Leonardo, as I have said, Tabachetti. In the chapel by Gaudenzio, from which they were taken, the figures of Leonardo and Scotto probably stood side by side as they still do in the Crucifixion chapel. I supposed that Tabachetti and D'Enrico, who must have perfectly well known who they were, separated them in order to get Giovanni D'Enrico nearer the grating. It was the presumption that we had D'Enrico's portrait between Scotto and Leonardo, and the conviction that Tabachetti also had worked in the chapel, that led me to examine the very beautiful figure on the farther side of Leonardo to see if I could find anything to confirm my suspicion that it was a portrait of Tabachetti himself. I do not think there can be much doubt that the Vec- , chietto is also a portrait of Tabachetti done some thirty years later than 1610, nor yet do I doubt, now I know that he returned to Varallo in 16 10, that the figures of Herod and of Caiaphas are by him. I believe he also at this time paid a short visit to Orta, and did three or four figures in the left hand part of the foreground of the Canonisation of St. Francis chapel. At Montrigone, a mile or so below Borgo-Sesia station, I believe him to have done at least two or three figures, which are very much in his manner, and not at all Hke either Giacomo Ferro or Giovanni D'Enrico, to whom they are usually assigned. These figures are some twenty or twenty-five years later than 16 10, and IV EX VOTO. tend to show that Tabachetti, as an old man of over seventy, paid a third visit to the Val-Sesia. The substance of the foregoing paragraphs is published at greater length, and with illustrations, in the number of the Universal Review for November 1888, and to which I must refer my readers. I have, however, here given the pith of all that I have yet been able to find out about Tabachetti since *' Ex Voto" was published. I should like to add the following in regard to other chapels. Signor Arienta has found a 1523 scrawled on the frescoes of the Crucifixion chapel. I do not think this shows neces- sarily that the work was more than begun at that date. He has also found a monogram, which we believe to be Gau- denzio Ferrari's, on the central shield with a lion on it, as given in the illustration facing p. 210. On further consideration, I feel more and more inclined to think that the frescoes in this chapel have been a good deal retouched. I hardly question that the Se- cond Vision of St. Joseph chapel is by Tabachetti, as also the Woman of Samaria. The Christ in this last chapel is a restoration. In a woodcut of 1640 the position of the figures is reversed, but nothing more than the positions. Lastly, the Virgin's mother does not have eggs east of Milan. It is a Valsesian custom to give eggs beaten up with wine and sugar to women immediately on their con- finement, and I am told that the eggs do no harm though not according to the rules. I am told that Valsesian influ- ence must always be suspected when the Virgin's mother is having eggs. November 30, 1888. Note. — A copy of this postscript can be easily inserted into a bound copy, and will be forwarded by Messrs. Trubner & Co. on receipt of stamped and addressed envelope. EX V O T O. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION, In the preface to '' Alps and Sanctuaries " I apologised for passing over Varallo-Sesia, the most important of North Italian sanctuaries, on the ground that it required a book to itself. This book I will now endeavour to supply, though well aware that I can only imperfectly and unworthily do so. To treat the subject in the detail it merits would be a task beyond my opportunities ; for, in spite of every endeavour, I have not been able to see several works and documents, without which it is useless to try and unravel the earlier history of the sanctuary. The book by Caccia, for example, published by Sessali at Novara in 1565, and reprinted at Brescia in 1576, is sure to turn up some day, but I have failed to find it at Varallo, Novara (where it appears in the catalogue, but not on ''a : :-:I; :•;;■• - .EX VOTO. the shelves), Milan, the Louvre, the British Museum, and the Bodleian Library. Through the kindness of Sac. Ant. Ceriani, I was able to learn that the Biblioteca Ambrosiana possessed what there can be little doubt is a later edition of this book, dated 1587, but really published at the end of 1586, and another dated 1591, to which Signor Galloni in his *^ Uomini e fatti celebri di Valle-Sesia '' (p. no) has called attention as the first work ever printed at Varallo. But the last eight of the twenty-one years between 1565 and 1586 were eventful, and much could be at once seen by a compari- son of the 1565, 1576, and 1586 [1587] editions, about which speculation is a waste of time while the earlier works are wanting. I have been able to gather two or three interesting facts by a comparison of the 1586 and 1591 editions, and do not doubt that the date, for example, of Tabachetti's advent to Varallo and of his great Calvary Chapel would be settled within a very few years if the missing books were available. Another document which I have in vain tried to see is the plan of the Sacro Monte as it stood towards the close of the sixteenth century, made by Pellegrino Tibaldi with a view to his own proposed alterations. He who INTRODUCTION. 3 is fortunate enough to gain access to this plan — which I saw for a few minutes in 1884, but which is now no longer at Varallo — will find a great deal made clear to him which he will otherwise be hardly able to find out. Over and above the foregoing, there is the inventory- drawn up by order of Giambattista Albertino in 1 6 14, and a number of other documents, to which reference will be found in the pages of Bordiga, Galloni, Tonetti, and of the many others who have written upon the Val Sesia and its history. A twelve months' stay in the Val Sesia would not suffice to do justice to all the interesting and important questions which arise wholesale as soon as the chapels on the Sacro Monte are examined with any care. I shall confine myself, therefore, to a consideration of the most remarkable features of the Sacro Monte as it exists at present, and to doing what I can to stimulate further study- on the part of others. I cannot understand how a field so interest- ing, and containing treasures in so many respects unrivalled, can have remained almost wholly untilled by the numerous English lovers of art who yearly flock to Italy ; but the fact is one on which I may perhaps be congratulated, inasmuch as more shortcomings and errors of judgment 4 EX VOTO. may be forgiven in my own book, in virtue of its being the first to bring Varallo with any prominence before English readers. That little is known about the Sacro Monte, even by the latest and best reputed authorities on art, may be seen by turning to Sir Henry Layard's recent edition of Kugler's *' Handbook of Painting/' — a work which our leading journals of culture have received with acclamation. Sir Henry Layard has evidently either never been at Varallo, or has so completely forgotten what he saw there that his visit no longer counts. He thinks, for example, that the chapels, or, as he also calls them, " stations " (which in itself should show that he has not seen them), are on the way up to the Sacro Monte, whereas all that need be considered are on the top. He thinks that the statues generally in these supposed chapels " on the ascent of the Sacro Monte " are attributed to Gaudenzio Ferrari, whereas it is only in two or three out of some five-and-forty that any statues are believed to be by Gaudenzio. He thinks the famous sculptor Tabachetti — for famous he is in North Italy, where he is known — was a painter, and speaks of him as *' a local imitator " of Gaudenzio, who *' decorated " other chapels, and '* whose works only show how rapidly Gaudenzio's influence declined and INTRODUCTION. 5 his school deteriorated.'' As a matter of fact, Tabachetti was a Fleming and his name was Tabaquet; but this is a detail. Sir Henry Layard thinks that *' Miel " was also " a local imitator" of Gaudenzio. It is not likely that this painter ever worked on the Sacro Monte at all ; but if he did, Sir Henry Layard should surely know that he came from Antwerp. Sir Henry Layard does not appear to know that there are any figures in the Crucifixion Chapel of Gaudenzio, or indeed in any of the chapels for which Gaudenzio painted frescoes, and falls into a trap which seems almost laid on purpose for those who would write about Varallo without having been there, in supposing that Gaudenzio painted a Pieta on the Sacro Monte. Having thus dis- played the ripeness of his knowledge as regards facts, he says that though the chapels ''on the ascent of the Sacro Monte " are " objects of wonder and admiration to the innumerable pil- grims who frequent this sacred spot," yet '' the bad taste of the colour and clothing make them highly repugnant to a cultivated eye." I begin to understand now how we came to buy the Blenheim Raffaelle. Finally, Sir Henry Layard says it is '' very doubtful " whether any of the statues were modelled or executed by Gaudenzio Ferrari at 6 EX VOTO. all. It is a pity he has not thought it necessary to give a single reason or authority in support of a statement so surprising. Some of these blunders appear in the edition of 1874 edited by Lady Eastlake. In that edition the writer evidently knows nothing of any figures in the Crucifixion Chapel, and Sir Henry Layard was unable to supply the omis- sion. The writer in the 1874 edition says that ** Gaudenzio is seen as a modeller of painted terra-cotta in the stations ascending to the chapel {sic) on the Sacro Monte." It is from this source that Sir Henry Layard got his idea that the chapels are on the way up to the Sacro Monte, and that they are distinct from those for which Gaudenzio painted frescoes on the top of the mountain. Having perhaps seen photographs of the Sacro Monte at Varese, where the chapels climb the hill along with the road, or having perhaps actually seen the Madonna del Sasso at Locarno, where small oratories with frescoes of the Stations of the Cross are placed on the ascent, he thought those at Varallo might as well remain on the ascent also, and that it would be safe to call them " stations." It is the writer in the 1874 edition who first gave him or her self airs about a culti- vated eye ; but he or she had the grace to put INTRODUCTION. 7 in a saving clause to the effect that the designs in some instances were " full of grace." True, Sir Henry Layard has never seen the designs ; nevertheless his eye is too highly cultivated to put up with this clause ; so it has disappeared, to make room, I suppose, for the sentence in which so much accurate knowledge is displayed in respect to Tabachetti and Miel d'Anvers. Sir Henry Layard should keep to the good old plan of saying that the picture would have been better if the artist had taken more pains, and praising the works of Pietro Perugino. Per- sonally, I confess I am sorry he has never seen the Sacro Monte. If he has trod on so many ploughshares without having seen Varallo, what might he not have achieved in the plenitude of a taste which has been cultivated in every re- spect save that of not pretending to know more than one does know, if he had actually been there, and seen some one or two of the statues themselves ? I have only sampled Sir Henry Layard's work in respect of two other painters, but have found no less reason to differ from him there than here. I refer to his remarks about Gio- vanni and Gentile Bellini. I must reserve the counter-statement of my own opinion for another work, in which I shall hope to deal with the 8 EX VOTO, real and supposed portraits of those two great men. I will, however, take the present oppor- tunity of protesting against a sentence which caught my eye in passing, and which I believe to be as fundamentally unsound as any I ever saw written, even by a professional art critic or by a director of a national collection. Sir Henry Layard, in his chapter on Leonardo da Vinci, says — "One thing prominently taught us by the works of Leonardo and Raffaelle, of Michael Angelo and Titian, is distinctly this — that purity of morals, freedom of institu- tions, and sincerity of faith have nothing to do with excel- lence in art." I should prefer to say, that if the works of the four artists above mentioned show one thing more clearly than another, it is that neither power over line, nor knowledge of form, nor fine sense of colour, nor facility of invention, nor any of the marvellous gifts which three out of the four undoubtedly possessed, will make any man's work live permanently in our affec- tions unless it is rooted in sincerity of faith and in love towards God and man. More briefly, it is dydTrrjy or the spirit, and not yv(oai<;y or the letter, which is the soul of all true art. This, it should go without saying, applies to music, literature, and to whatever can be done at all. INTRODUCTION. 9 If it has been done '' to the Lord " — that is to say, with sincerity and freedom from affecta- tion — whether with conscious effusion, as by Gaudenzio, or with perhaps robuster uncon- sciousness, as by Tabachetti, a halo will gather round it that will illumine it though it pass through the valley of the shadow of death itself. If it has been done in self-seeking, as, exceptis ex- cipiendis, by Leonardo, Titian, Michael Angelo, and Raffaelle, it will in due course lose hold and power in proportion to the insincerity with which it was tainted. ( lo ) CHAPTER II. THE REV. S. W, KING—LAN ZI AND LOMAZZO. Leaving Sir Henry Layard, let us turn to one of the few English writers who have given some attention to Varallo — I mean to the Rev. S. W. King's delightful work '' The Italian Valleys of the Pennine Alps." This author says — " When we first visited Varallo, it was comparatively little known to travellers, but we now found that of late years many more had frequented it, and its beautiful scenery and great attractions were becoming more generally and deservedly appreciated. Independently of its own pictu- resque situation, and its advantages as head-quarters for exploring the neighbouring Vals and their romantic scenery, the works which it possesses of the ancient and famous Val Sesian school of painters and modellers are most interesting. At the head of them stands first and foremost Gaudenzio Ferrari, whose original and masterly productions ought to be far more widely known and studied than they as yet are ; and some of the finest of them are to be found in the churches and Sacro Monte of Varallo " (p. 498). Of the Sacro Monte the same writer says — " No situation could have been more happily chosen for the purpose intended than the little mountain rising on the THE REV. S. W, KING, ii north of Varallo to a height of about 270 feet" — [this is an error ; the floor of the church on the Sacro Monte is just 500 feet above the bridge over the Mastallone] — " on which the chapels, oratories, and convents of that extra- ordinary creation the New Jerusalem are grouped together. Besides the beauty of the site and its convenient proximity to a town like Varallo of some 3000 inhabitants, the char- acter of the mountain is exactly adapted for the effective disposition of the various * stations ' of which it consists " — [it does not consist of "stations"] — "and on this account chiefly it was selected by the founder, the * Blessed Ber- nardino Caimo.' A Milanese of noble family, and Vicar of the Convent of the Minorites in Milan, and also in connec- tion with that of Varallo, he was specially commissioned by Pope Sixtus IV. to visit the Sepulchre and other holy places in Palestine, and while there took the opportunity of making copies and drawings, with the intention of erect- ing a facsimile of them in his native country. On his return to Italy in 1491, after examining all the likely sites within reasonable distance of Milan, he found the conical hills of the Val Sesia the best adapted for his design, and fixed upon Varallo as the spot; being probably specially attracted to it from the fact of the convent and church of Sta. Maria delle Grazie, already described, having been conveyed through him to the *Minori Osservanti,' as appears from a brief of Innocent VIII., dated December 21, i486." Mr. King does not give the source from which he derived his knowledge of the existence of this act, and I have not come across a notice of it elsewhere, except a brief one in Signor Galloni's work (p. 71), and a reference to it in the conveyance of April 14, 1493. But Signor Arienta of Varallo, whose industry in collecting 12 EX VOTO. materials for a history of the Sacro Monte can- not be surpassed, showed me a transcript from an old plan of the church of S. Maria delle Grazie, in which the inscription on Bernardino Caimi's grave was given — an inscription which (so at least I understood Signor Arienta to say) is now covered by an altar which had been erected on the site of the grave. The inscrip- tion ran : — *' Hie quiescunt ossa B. Bernardini Caimis Mediolan. S. Montis Varalli Fundatoris An. i486. Pontif. Dipl sub die 21 Xbris. Mortuus est autem in hoc ccenobio An. Vulg. JEr^ i499-" It would thus appear that the Sacro Monte was founded four years earlier than the received date. The formal deed of conveyance of the site on the mountain from the town to Ber- nardino Caimi was not signed till the 14th of April 1493; but the work had been already commenced, as is shown by the inscription still remaining over the reproduction of the Holy Sepulchre, which is dated the 17th of October 1 49 1. Probably the work was contemplated in i486, and interrupted by B. Caimi's return to Jerusalem in 1487, not to be actively re- sumed till 1490. " The first stone," says Mr. King, " was laid by Scarognini, a Milanese *magnifico,' who cordially entered into the THE REV, S. W. KING. 13 scheme ; and at his expense the Holy Sepulchre was com- pleted, and a hospice attached, where the founder and a number of Franciscan brothers came to reside in 1493. Caimo had planned a vast extension of this commencement, but died within three years, leaving his designs to be carried out by his successors." " Each oratory contains a group — in some very numerous — of figures modelled in terra-cotta the size of life or larger ; many of them of great merit as works of art, others very in- ferior and mere rubbish. The figures are coloured and occa- sionally draped with appropriate clothing, the resemblance to life being heightened by the addition of human hair" — [which, by the way, is always horse-hair] — " and the effect is often very startling. Each chapel represents a different * mystery,' and, beside the modelled figures, the walls are decorated with frescoes. The front of each is open to the air, all but a wire grating, through apertures in which the subject may be perfectly seen in the position intended by the designer" (pp. 510-512). Mr. King says, correctly, that Gaudenzio's earliest remaining work on the Sacro Monte is the Chapel of the Pieta, that originally con-' tained the figures of Christ bearing the cross, but from which the modelled figures were re- moved, others being substituted that had no connection with the background. I do not know, however, that Christ was actually carry- ing the cross in the chapel as it originally stood. The words of the 1587 edition of Caccia (?) stand, "Come il N.S. fu spogliato de suoi panni, e condotto sopra il Monte Cal- 14 EX VOTO. vario, ch' e fatto di bellissimo e ben inteso relievo." "The frescoes on the wall," he continues, "are parti- cularly interesting, as having been painted by him at the early age of nineteen " — [Mr. King supposes Gaudenzio Ferrari to have been born in 1484] — "when his ambition to share in the glory and renown of the great work was grati- fied by this chapel being intrusted to him ; a proof of his early talent and the just appreciation of it. The frescoes are much injured, but of the chief one there is enough to show its excellence. On one side is St. John, with clasped hands gazing upwards in grief, and the two Marys sorrow- ing, as a soldier in the centre seems to forbid their following further ; his helmet is embossed and gilt as in the instances in the Franciscan church, while the two thieves are led bound by a figure on horseback." These frescoes appear to me to have been not so much restored as repainted — that is to say, where they are not almost entirely gone. The green colour that now prevails in the shadows and half-tones is alien to Gaudenzio, and cannot be accepted as his. I should say, however, that my friend Signor Arienta of Varallo differs from me on this point. At any rate, the work is now little more than a ruin, and the terra-cotta Pieta is among the least satisfactory groups on the Sacro Monte. Mr. King continues : — " In the Chapel of the Adoration of the Magi we have a work of higher merit, giving evidence of his studies under Raphael." THE REV. S. W. KING. 15 Here Mr. King is in some measure mis- taken. The frescoes in the Magi Chapel are indeed greatly finer than those in the present Pieta, but they were painted from thirty to forty years later, when Gaudenzio was in his prime, and it is to years of intervening inces- sant effort and practice, not to any study under Raphael, that the enlargement of style and greater freedom of design is due. Gaudenzio never studied under Raphael ; he may have painted for him, and perhaps did so — no one knows whether he did or did not — but inr every branch of his art he was incomparably Raphael's superior, and must have known it perfectly well. Returning to Mr. King, with whom, in the main, I am in cordial sympathy, we read : — **The group of ten figures in terra-cotta represents the three kings just arrived with their immediate attendants, and alighting at the door of an inner recess, where a hght burns over the manger of Bethlehem, and in which is a simple but exquisite group of St. Joseph, the Virgin, and Child. On the walls of the chapel are painted in fresco a crowd of followers, the varieties of whose costumes, attitudes, and figures are most cleverly portrayed. In modelling the horses which form part of the central group, Ferrari was assisted by his pupil Fermo Stella." — [Fermo Stella is not known to have been a pupil of Gaudenzio's, and was probably estabhshed as a painter before Gaudenzio began to work at all] — " But the greatest of all Gaudenzio's achievements is the large chapel of the Crucifixion, a work of the most extraordinary character and masterly execution. His first 1 6 EX VOTO. design for the subject, on the screen of the Minorite Church, he has here carried out in life-like figures in terra-cotta; twenty-six of which form the centre group, embodying the events of the Passion ; while round the walls are depicted v/ith wonderful power a crowd of spectators, numbering some 150, most of whom are gazing at the central figure of the Saviour on the cross. The variety of expression, costume, and character is almost infinite. Round the roof are twenty angels in the most varied and graceful attitudes, deserving of special attention ; and also a hideous figure of Lucifer." Gaudenzio's devils are never quite satisfac- tory. His angels are divine, and no one can make them cry as he does. When my friend Mr. H. Festing Jones met a lovely child crying in the streets of Varallo last summer, he said it was crying like one of Gaudenzio's angels ; and so it was. Gaudenzio was at home with every- thing human, and even superhuman, if beautiful ; if it was only a case of dealing with ugly, wicked, and disagreeable people, he knew all about this, and could paint them if the occasion required it; but when it came to a downright unmitigated devil, he was powerless. He could never have done Tabachetti^s serpent in the Adam and Eve Chapel, nor yet the plausible fair-spoken devil, as in the Temptation Chapel, also by Tabachetti. To conclude my extracts from Mr, King. Speaking of the Crucifixion Chapel, he says : — " Though this combination of terra-cotta and fresco may LANZL 17 not be as highly esteemed in the present day as in the times when this extraordinary sanctuary sprang into existence, yet this composition must always be admired as one of the greatest of Ferrari's works, and undoubtedly that on which he lavished the full force of his genius and the collected studies and experience of his previous artist life." It is noteworthy, but not perhaps surprising, that this observant, intelh'gent, and sympathetic writer, probably through inability to at once understand and enter into the conventions rendered necessary by the conditions under which works so unfamiliar to him must be both executed and looked at, has failed to notice the existence of Tabachetti, never mentioning his name nor referring to one of his works — not even to the Madonna and Child in the church of S. Gaudenzio, which one would have thought could hardly fail to strike him. Mr. King has elsewhere in his work re- ferred both to Lanzi and to Lomazzo in support of his very high opinion of Gaudenzio Ferrari ; it may, therefore, be as well to give extracts from each of these writers. Lanzi says : — " If we examine into further particulars of his style, we shall find Ferrari's warm and lively colouring so superior to that of the Milanese artists of his day, that we shall have no difficulty in recognising it in the churches where he painted; the eye of the spectator is directly attracted i8 EX VOTO, towards it ; his carnations are natural and varied according to his subjects; his draperies display much fancy and originality, with middle tints blended so skilfully as to equal the most' beautiful produced by any other artist. And, if we may say so, — he succeeded in representing the minds even better than the forms of his subjects. He particularly studied this branch of the art, and we seldom observe more marked attitudes or more expressive. . . . As Lomazzo, however, has dwelt so much at length on his admirable skill both in painting and modelling, it would be idle to insist on it further. But I ought to add that it is a great reflection upon Vasari that he did not better know or better estimate such an artist ; so that foreigners who form their opinions only from history are left unacquainted with his merit, and have uniformly neglected to do him justice in their writings." Lomazzo says : — " Now amongst the worthy painters who excelled herein, Raph. Urbine was not the least who performed his workes with a divine kind of maiesty j neither was Polidore" — [Polidoro Caldara da Caravaggio]^" much behind him in his kinde, whose pictures seemed as it were passing furious; nor yet Andreas Mantegna, whose vaine showed a very laborious curiositie; nor yet Leonard Vincent" — [Leonardo da Vinci] — " in whose doings there was never any error found in this point. Wherof amongst all other of his works, that admirable last supper of Christ in Refect. S. Maria de Gratia in] Milane maketh most evident proofe, in which he hath so lively expressed the passions of the Apostles mindes in their countenances and the rest of their bodies, that a man may boldly say the truth was nothing superior to his representation, and neede not be afraide to reckon it among the best works of oyle-painting (of which kind of painting John de Bruges was the first inventor). For in those Apostles you might distinctly perceive admira- LOMAZZO. 19 tion, feare, griefe/suspition, love, &c.; all which were some- times to be seen together in one of them, and finally in Judas a treason-plotting countenance, as it were the very true counterfiet of a traitor. So that therein he has left a sufficient argument of his rare perfection, in the true understanding of the passions of the mind exemplified out- wardly in the bodie. Which because it is the most neces- sary part of painting, I purpose (as I say) to handle in this present booke. I may not omit Ml Angelo in any case, whose skill and painfulnesse in this point was so greate, that his pictures carry with them more hard motions expressed after an unusual manner, but all of them tending to a cer- taine bould stoutnesse. And as for Titian, he hath worthely purchased the name of a great painter in this matter, as his pictures do sufficiently witness; in each whereof there shineth a certain mooving vertue, seeming to incite the beholder unto the imitation thereof. Of whom this saying may well be veri- fied, that he was beloved of the world and envied of nature. *^ Finally, mine old Master Gaudentius (though he be not much knowne) was inferior unto fewe, in giving the apt motions to the Saintes and Angels ; who was not onely a very witty painter (as I have elsewhere showed), but also a most profound philosopher and mathematician. Amongst all whose all-praiseworthy workes (which are almost infinite, especially in this point of motion) there are divers mysteries of Christe's passion, of his doing, but chiefly a crucifix called Mount Calvary at the Sepulchre of Varallo ; where he hath made admirable horses and strange angels, not only in painting, but also in plasticke, of a kinde of earth wrought most curiously with his own hand cleane rounde " — [dt tutto rilievo\ — " through all the figures. " Besides in the vault of the Chappell of S. Mary de Gratia in Milane he hath wrought most naturall angels, I meane especially for their actions ; there is also that mighty cube of St. Mary de Serono, the Cupola of S. Maria at Saronno, full of thrones of angells set out with actions and 2 EX VOTO, habites of all sortes, carrying diversity of most strange instruments in their hands. I may not conceal that goodly chapel which he made in his latter time, in the Church of Peace in Milan, where you shall find small histories of our Lady and Joachime showing such superexcellent motions that they seem much to revive and animate the spectators. "Moreover, the story of S. Roccho done by him in Vercelli, with divers workes in that city; although indeede almost all Lombardy be adorned with his most rare workes, I will not conceal one saying, which was that all painters delight to steale other men's inventions, but that he himself was in no great danger of being detected of theft hereafter. , Now this great painter, although in reason he might for his dis- cretion, wisedome, and worth be compared with the above named in the first booke, cap. 29, yet notwithstanding is he omitted by George Vasary in his lives of the famous painters, carvers, and architects. An argument, to say no worse of him, that he intended to eternise only his own Tuscanes. But I proceede to the unfoulding of the originall causes of these motions. And first for our better under- standing I will beginne with those passions of the mind whereby the body is mooved to the performance of his particular effects " (Id., Book ii. pp. 7, 8). What Gaudenzio said was that all painters were fond of stealing, but that they were pretty sure to be found out sooner or later. For my own part, I should like to say that I prefer Giovanni Bellini to Gaudenzio; but unless Giotto and Giorgione, I really do not know who else of the Italian painters should stand before him. Bernardino Luini runs him close, but great as Bernardino Luini was, Gaudenzio, in spite of not a little mannerism, was greater. LOMAZZO. 21 The passage above referred to by Lomazzo as from his twenty-ninth chapter runs : — " Now if any man be desirous to learne the most exact and smallest parts of these proportions, together with the way how to transfer them from one body to another, I refer him to the works of Le. Vincent, Bramante, Vincentius Foppa, Barnard Zenale; and for prints to Albert Durer, Hispill Peum, &c. And out of mine owne workes he may gather that I have endeavoured if not performed these proportions, done according to these rules; which all the best and famous painters of our time have likewise observed ; who have also attained to the exquisite proportions of the seven planets. Amongst whom Mi. Angelo hath merited the chiefest commendation ; next him Raph. Urbine was famous for making of delicate and Venereall bodies ; Leon. Vincent for expressing of solary bodies ; Polidore Caldara of Caravaggio for Martiall bodies ; Titianus Vecellino for Lunaryes ; and Gaudentius Ferrato da Valdugia a Milaner for Jovialistes" (55 Bk. i. p. 117). Having been compelled to look through the greater part of Lomazzo's work, inasmuch as not one of the several writers who have referred to his high opinion of Gaudenzio has given chapter and page, I would fain allow myself to linger somewhat in the fascinating paths into which my subject has led me. I should like to call further attention to this forgotten work as '* Englished " by one Richard Haydocke, '' Student in Physik/' and dedicated to no less a person than ''to the Right Worshipful Thomas Bodley, Esq.," whose foundation of the library 2 2 EX VOTO. that bears his name is referred to in the preface. Gladly would I tell him about Alexander the Great, who, being overmatched by his enemies in India, " was seen to reake forth from his bodie fier and light;" and of the father of Theodoricus, who, *' by the like vehement effect, breathed out of his heart, as from a burning furnace, fierce sparkels; which flying forth, shone, and made a sound in the aire." I should like to explain to him about the motions of the seven planets which are the seven governours of the world, and how Saturn '' causeth a complexion of colour between blacke and yeallowe, meager, distorted, of an harde skinne, eminent vaines^ an hairie bodie, small eies, eie brows joyned together &c.," and how '*he maketh a man subtle, wittie, a way-layer, and murtherer ;" how, again, Jupiter is *' magnipotent, good natured, fortunate, sweete, pleasant, the best wel-willer, honest, neate, of a good gate, honorable, the author of mirth and judgement, wise, true, the revealer of truth, the chiefe judge, exceeding all the planets in goodnesse, the bestower of riches and wisedome;" how Mars ** broaches bould spirites, bloud, brawles and all disordered, inconsiderate, and headdy actions ; " how " his gestures are terrible, cruell, fierce, angry, proude, hasty and violent," and how also " he is reputed LOMAZZO. 23 hoat and drie in the highest degree, bearing sway over redde choler." I should Hke to tell him about the passions, actions, and the ges- tures they occasion, described as they are with a sweet and silly unreasonableness that is very charming to read, and makes no demand what- ever upon the understanding. But charming as are the pages of Lomazzo, those of Torrotti are more charming still, and they have a con- nection with our subject which Lomazzo's have not. Enough, therefore, that Mr. Haydocke did not get through more than half Lomazzo's treatise, and that, glancing over the untranslated pages, I see frequent allusions to Gaudenzio in the warmest terms, but no passage so important as the longer of the two quoted above. ( 24 ) CHAPTER III. VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. Now that Varallo can be easily reached by the new railway from Novara, it is not likely to remain so little known much longer. The town is agreeable to stay in ; it contains three ex- cellent inns. I name them in geographical order. They are the Italia, the Croce Bianca, and the Posta, while there is another not less excellent on the Sacro Monte itself. I have stayed at all these inns, and have received so much kindness in each of them, that I must decline the invidious task of recommending any one of them especially. My book is intended for Varallo, and not for this or that hotel. The neighbourhood affords numberless excursions, all of them full of interest and beauty ; the town itself, though no exception to the rule that the eastern cities of North Italy are more beautiful than the western, is still full of admirable sub- jects for those who are fond of sketching. The VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 25 people are hospitable to a fault ; personally, I owe them the greatest honour that has ever been conferred upon me — an honour far greater than any I have ever received among those who know me better, and are probably better judges of my deserts. The climate is healthy, the nights being cool even in the height of summer, and the days almost invariably sunny and free from fog in winter. With all these advantages, therefore, it is not easy to under- stand the neglect that has befallen it, except on the ground that until lately it has been singularly difficult of access. Two hundred years ago it must have been much as it is at present. Turning to the work of the excellent Canon Torrotti, published in 1686, I find he writes as follows : — " Oh, what fannings is there not here," he exclaims, " of the assiduous Zephyrs ; what warmth in winter, what gelid- ness of the air in summer ; and what freaks are there not of Nature by way of caves, grottoes, and delicious chambers hewn by her own hand. Here can be enjoyed wines of the very finest flavour, trout as dainty as can be caught in any waters, game of the most singular excellence ; in short, there is here a great commodity of everything most sensual and pleasing to the palate. And of those who come here, above all I must praise the Piedmontese, who arrive in frequent cavalcades of from twenty to five-and-twenty people, to an edification which is beyond all praise ; and they are munificent in the gifts they leave behind them to the Holy Place — not resembling those who are mean 26 EX VOTO, towards God though they will spend freely enough upon their hotel-bill. Carriages of all sorts can be had here easily ; it is the Milanese who for the most part make use of these carriages and equipages, for they are pompous and splendid in their carryings on. From elsewhither pro- cessions arrive daily, even from Switzerland, and there are sometimes as many as ten thousand visitors extraordinary come here in a single day, yet is there no hindrance but they find comfortable lodging, and at very reasonable prices. "As for the distance, it is about sixty miles, or two easy days' journey from Milan; it is much the same from Turin ; it is one day from Novara, and one from Vercelli ; but the most delightful thing about this journey is that you can combine so many other devotions along with it. In the Milanese district, for example, there is the mountain of Varese, and that of S. Carlo of Arona cfn the Lago Maggiore ; and there are S. Francesco and S. Giulio on the Lago d' Orta; then there is the Madonna of Oropa in the mountains of Biella, which sanctuary is in the diocese of Vercelli, as is also S. Giovanni di Campiglio, the Madonna di Crevacore, and Gattinara ; there is also the Mount Calvary of Domo d' Ossola, on the road towards Switzerland, and Montrigone below Borgosesia. These, indeed, are but chapels in imitation of our own Holy Sepulchre, and cannot compare with it neither in opulence nor in importance ; still those of Varese and Oropa are of some note and wealth. More- over, the neighbourhood of this our own Jerusalem is the exact counterpart of that which is in the Holy Land, having the Mastallone on the one side for the brook Kedron, and the Sesia for the Jordan, and the lake of Orta for that of Caesaraea ; while for the Levites there are the fathers of St. Bernard of Mentone in the Graian and Pennine Alps of Aosta, where there are so many Roman antiquities that they may be contemplated not only as monuments of empire, but as also of the vanity of all human greatness " (pp. 19-2 1). VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 27 A little later the Canon tells us of the an- tiquity of the councils that have been held in the neighbourhood, and of one especially :— " Which was held secretly by five bishops on the summit of one of the mountains of Sorba in the Val Rassa, which is still hence called the bishops' seat ; for they came thither as to the place where the five dioceses adjoined, and each one sat on a stone within the boundary of his own diocese ; and they are those of Novara, Vercelli, Ivrea, Orta, and Sion. Nor must we forget the signal service rendered to the universal church in these same mountains of Rassa by the discomfiture of the heretic monks Gazzari to which end Pope Clement V. in 1307 issued several bulls, and among them one bearing date on the third day of the ides of August, given at Pottieri, in which he confirmed the liberty of our people, and acknowledged the Capi as Counts of the Church For the Valsesian people have been ever free, and by God's grace have shaken off the yoke of usurpers while continuing faithful and profitable subjects of those who have equitably protected them." Torrotti goes on to tell us about the Blessed shepherdess Panesia, a virgin of the most exquisite beauty, and only fifteen years old, v^ho was martyred on the ist of May 1383 on the mountain of S. Giovanni of Quarona, with three wounds on her head and two on her throat, inflicted by a wicked stepmother who had a devil, and whose behests she had obeyed with such consummate sweetness that she had attained perfection ; on which, so invariably do extremes meet, she had to be put to death and 28 EX VOTO. made a martyr ; and if we want to know more about her, we can find it in the work that has been so elegantly written about her by the most illustrious Father Castiglione Sommasco. Again, there was the famous miracle in 1333 of S. Maiolo in Val Rassa, which is celebrated every year, and in virtue of which Pietro, only child of Viscount Emiliano, one of the three brothers who fought against the heretics, was saved after having been carried off by a raven- ous wolf into the woods of Val Sorba as far as the fountain named after the rout which this same Count, when he afterwards grew up, in- flicted upon the enemies of the valley in 1377 ; wherefore he is seen in an old picture of those times as a child in swaddling-clothes in the mouth of a wolf, and he gave the name of Fassola di S. Maiolo to his descendants. Nor, as in private duty bound, can the worthy Canon forget — " My own beloved chapel of St. Mary of the Snow, for whose honour and glory I have done my utmost, at the entrance of the Val Mastallone ; for here on a fragment of ruined wall there grow at all times sundry flowers, even in the ice and snows of winter ; wherefore I had the distich set up where it may be now seen." I have never seen it, but must search for it next time I go to Varallo. Torrotti presently says that the country being sterile, the people VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 29 are hard pressed for food during two-thirds of the year; hence they have betaken them- selves to commerce and to sundry arts, with which they overrun the world, returning home but once or twice a year, with their hands well filled with that which they have garnered, to sustain and comfort themselves with their families ; and their toil and the gains that they have made redound no little to the advan- tage of the states of Milan and Piedmont. He again declares that they maintain their liberty, neither will they brook the least in- fringement thereon. And their neighbours, he continues, as well as the dwellers in the valley itself, are interested in this ; for here, as in some desert or peaceful wilderness, the noble families of Italy and neighbouring provinces have been ever prone to harbour in times of war and trouble. Then, later, there comes an account of a battle, which I cannot very well understand, but it seems to have been fought on the 26th of July 1655. The Savoyards were on their way to assist at a siege of Pavia, and were determined to punish the Valsesians en route ; they had come up from Romagnano to Borgo- sesia, when the Valsesians attacked them as they were at dinner, and shot off the finger 30 EX VOTO. of a general officer who was eating an egg ; on this the battle became general, and the Savoyards were caught every way ; for the waters of the Sesia had come down in flood during the night. The Germans of Alagna, Rima, and Rimella were in it, somehow, and those of Pregemella in the Val Dobbia. I can- not make out whether the Pregemella people were Germans or merely people ; either way, the German-speaking villages in the Val Sesia appear to have been the same two hundred years ago as now. I mean, it does not seem that the German-speaking race extended lower down the valley then than now. But at any rate, the queen, or whoever " Madama Reale " may be, was very angry about the battle. " It is the custom," concludes our author, " in token of holy cheerfulness {allegria spirituale) to wear a sprig of pine in the hat on leaving the holy place, to show that the visitor has been there ; for it has some fine pine trees. This cus- tom was introduced in royal merriment by Carlo Emmanuele I. He put a sprig in his hat, and was imitated by all his court, and the ladies wore the same in their bosom or in their hair. Assuredly it is one of the wonders of the world to see here, amid the amenities and allurements of the country, especially during the summer season, what a con- tinuous festa or holy fair is maintained. For there come and go torrents of men and women of every nation under heaven. Here you shall see pilgrims and persons in religion of every description, processions, prelates, and often princes and princesses, carriages, litters, caleches, equipages, caval- VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 31 cades accompanied by trumpeters, gay troops of cavaliers, and ladies with plumes in their hats and rich apparel where- withal to make themselves attractive ; and at intervals you shall hear all manner of songs, concerts, and musical instru- ments, both civil and miHtary, all done with a modest and devout cheerfulness of demeanour, by which I am reminded of nothing so strongly as of the words of the Psalmist in the which he saith * Come and see the works of the Lord, for He hath done wonders upon earth.' " It must have been something like our own Tunbridge Wells or Bath in the last century. Indeed, one is tempted to think that if the sea had come up to Varallo, it must have been almost more like Margate than Jerusalem. Nor can we forget the gentle rebuke admini- stered on an earlier page to those w^ho came neither on business nor for devotion's sake, but out of mere idle curiosity, and bringing with them company which the good Canon designates as scandalous. Mats nous avons change tout cela. I have allowed myself to quote so freely from Torrotti, as thinking that the reader will glean more incidentally from these fragments about the genius of Varallo and its antecedents than he would get from pages of disquisition on my own part. Returning to the Varallo of modern times, I would say that even now that the rail- way has been opened, the pleasantest way of 32 EX VOTO, getting there is still over the Colma from Pella opposite Orta. I always call this road '* the root/' for I once saw it thus described, obviously in good faith, in the visitors' book at one of the inns in Varallo. The gentleman said he had found '' the root " without any difficulty at Pella, had taken it all the way to Varallo, and it was delicious. He said it was one of the finest '* roots " he had ever seen, and it was only nine or ten miles long. There were one or two other things in that book, of which, while I am about it, I should like to deliver my mind. A certain man who wrote a bold round hand signed his name '' Tom Taylor " — doubtless not the late well- known art critic and dramatic writer, but some other person of the same name — in the visitors' book of the Hotel Leone d' Oro at Orta, and added the word ** disgusted.'* I saw this entry, then comparatively recent, in 1871, and on going on to the Hotel d' Italia at Varallo, found it repeated — '' Tom Taylor disgusted." The entries in each case were probably aimed at the Sacro Monte, and not at the inn ; but they grated on me, as they must have done on , many other English visitors ; and I saw with pleasure that some one had written against the second of them the following epigram, VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 33 which is too neat not to be preserved. It ran : — " Oh wretched Tom Taylor, disgusted at Orta, At Varallo we find him disgusted again ; The feeling's contagious, I really have caught a Disgust for Tom Taylor — he travels in vain." Who, I wonder, was it who could fling off such an apt impromptu, and how many more mute inglorious writers have we not who might do anything they chose if they would only choose to do anything at all ? Some one else had written on an earlier page ; — I. " While youVe that which makes the mare go You should stay at this albergo, Bona in esse and in posse Are dispensed by Joseph Rossi. 2. " Ask him and he'll set before ye Vino birra e liquori, Asti, Grignolino, Sherry Prezzi moderati — ^very." There was more, but I have forgotten it. Joseph Rossi was a famous old waiter long since retired, something like Pietro at the Hotel Rosa Rossa at Casale, whom all that country side knew perfectly well. This last entry reminds me of a somewhat similar one 34 EX VOTO. which I saw some five and thirty years ago at the inn at Harlech ; — T^5e irav ApiffTOv ^(tti] AeTiTPOv oXvov /cat yaX ijdv. By this 'ere I mean to testi- fy how very well they feed you. " Quam superba sit ruina, Ipsa sua semper laus, And the castle — nothing finer, With its ivy and jackdaws." It is a pity the art of writing such pleas- ing little poems should be now so generally neglected in favour of more ambitious compo- sitions. Whatever brevity may be as regards wit it is certainly the soul of all agreeable poetry. But again to return to Varallo, or rather to the way of reaching it by the Colma. There is nothing in North Italy more beautiful than this walk, with its park-like chestnut-covered slopes of undulating pasture land dotted about with the finest thatched barns to be found outside Titian. We might almost fancy that Handel had it in his mind when he wrote his divine air '* Verdi Prati." Certainly no country can be better fitted either to the words or VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 35 music. It continues in full beauty all the way to Civiasco, where the carriage road begins that now goes down into the main road between Varallo and Novara, joining it a mile and a half or so below Varallo. Close to the point of juncture there is a chapel of singularly graceful elegant design, called the Madonna di Loreto. To this chapel I will again return : it is covered with fres- coes. Near it there is an open triangular piece of grass land on which a murderer was beheaded within the memory of persons still living. A wild old man, who looked like an executioner broken loose from the flagellation chapel on the Sacro Monte, but who was quite tame and kind to us when we came to know him, told Jones and myself this last summer that he remembered seeing the murderer brought here and beheaded, this being as close as might be to the place where the murder had been committed. We were at first rather sceptical, but on inquiry at Varallo found that there had been an execution here, the last in the open country, somewhere about the year 1835. From this spot two roads lead to Varallo ; one somewhat circuitous by Mantegna, a village notable for a remarkable fresco out- 36 EX VOTO, side the church, in which the Virgin is appear- ing to a lady and gentleman as they are lying both of them fast asleep in a large bed, with their two dear little round heads on a couple of comfortable pillows. The three Magi in the very interesting frescoes behind the choir in the church of S. Abbondio at Como are, if I remember, all in one bed when the angel comes to tell them about the star, and I fancy they have a striped counterpane, but it is some time since I saw the frescoes ; at any rate the angel was not a lady. We had often before seen the Virgin appear to a lady in bed, and even to a gentleman in bed, but never before to a lady and a gentleman both in the same bed. She is not, however, so much appearing to them as sitting upon them, and I should say she was pretty heavy. The fresco is dated 1641. The other road is the direct one, and passes the old church of St. Mark, outside which there are some charming fifteenth-century frescoes by nobody in particular, and among them a cow who, at the instance of St. Mark, is pinning a bear or wolf to a tree in a most resolute deter- mined manner. There are other frescoes on this church by the Varallese painter Luini (not to be con- VARALLO, PAST AND PRESENT. 37 founded with Bernardino), but I do not remem- ber them as remarkable. Up to this point the two highest peaks of Monte Rosa are still visible when clouds per- mit ; here they disappear behind nearer moun- tains, and in a few more hundred yards Varallo is entered. ( 3^ ) CHAPTER IV. BERNARDINO CAIMI, AND FASSOLA. In geographical position Varallo is the most western city of North Italy in which painting and sculpture were endemic. Turin, No vara, Vercelli, Casale, Ivrea, Biella, Alessandria, and Aosta have no endemic art comparable to that of the cities east of Milan. Bergamo, Brescia, Verona, Vicenza, Padua, not to mention Venice and the cities of the Friuli, not only produced artists who have made themselves permanently famous, but are themselves, in their architecture and external features generally, works of art as impressive as any they contain ; they are stamped with the widely-spread instinctive feel- ing for beauty with which the age and people that reared them must assuredly have been inspired. The eastern cities have perhaps suf- fered more from war, nevertheless it is hard to think that the beauty so characteristic of the eastern Lombardic cities should fail so con- BERNARDINO CAIMI, AND FASSOLA. 39 spicuously, at least by comparison, in the wes- tern, if the genius of the places had been the same. All cities are symptomatic of the men who built them, towns no less than bodily organisation being that unknown something which we call mind or spirit made manifest in material form. Englishmen, Frenchmen, Ger- mans, and Italians — to name them in alpha- betical order, are not more distinct in their several faults and virtues than are London, Paris, Berlin, and Rome, in the impression they leave on those who see them. How closely in each case does the appearance of the city corre- spond with the genius of the nation of which it is the capital. The same holds good more or less with the provincial cities of any country. They have each in a minor degree their dis- tinctive evidences of character, and it will hardly be denied that while the North Italian genius is indebted to the cities of Piedmont for perhaps its more robust and vigorous elements, it owes its command of beauty whether of form or colour to Lombardy rather than to Piedmont. It seems to have been ordained that an endemic interest in art should not cross the Po northward to the west of the Ticino, and to this rule Varallo is only partially an exception ; the reasons which led to its being an exception at all will be con- 40 £X VOTO. sidered presently. I know, of course, that Novara, and still more Vercelli, contain master- pieces by Gaudenzio Ferrari, but in each case the art was exotic, and with the not very note- worthy exceptions of Lanini, Difendente Ferrari di Chivasso, and Macrino d'Alba, I do not at the moment call to mind the name of a single even high second-class painter or sculptor who has hailed from west of the Valsesia. The exceptional position of Varallo as regards North Italian art must be referred mainly to its selection by Bernardino Caimi as the site for the New Jerusalem which he founded there at the end of the fifteenth century ; a few words, therefore, concerning him will not be out of place here ; I learn from Torrotti that he was a '' Frate Minore Osservante di S. Francesco/' and came of the noble and illustrious Milanese family of the Counts Caimi. He had been Patriarch of the Holy Land, and, as I find stated in Simor Galloni's excellent work already referred to,"^ had been employed on important missions in the island of Cyprus, chiefly in connection with the reformation of abuses. Full of zeal and devotion he returned to his native country, and ere long conceived the design of reproducing in Italy a copy of * " Uomini e Fatti," &c., p. 65, &c. BERNARDINO CAIML 41 the most important sites in the Holy Land, for the comfort and greater commodity of so many Christians who, being unable to commit themselves to long and weary voyages by land and sea, and among infidels, might gather thence some portion of that spiritual fruit which were otherwise beyond their reach. Old and mendicant as he was, he was nothing daunted by the magnitude of the task before him, and searched Lombardy from one end to the other in his desire to provide Providence with a suitable abode. For a long while he sought in vain, and could find no place that was really like Jerusalem, but at last, towards the end of 1491, he came to Varallo alone, and had hardly got there before he felt himself rapt into an ecstasy, in the which he was drawn towards the Sacro Monte ; when he got up to the plain on the top of the mountain which was then called " La Parete," perceiving at once its marvellous resemblance to Jerusalem, even to the existence of another mountain hard by which was like Calvary, he threw himself on the ground and thanked God in a transport of delight. It is said that for some time previously the shepherds who watched their flocks on this solitary height had been talking of nothing but of heavenly harmonies that had been heard 42 EX VOTO. coming from the sky ; that Caimi himself while yet in the Holy Land had been shown this place in a vision ; and that on reaching an eminence called Sceletta he had been conducted to the site itself by the song of a bird which sang with such extraordinary sweetness that he had been constrained to follow it. I should have set this' bird down as a blue rock thrush or passero solitarto, for I know these birds breed yearly on the Sacro Monte, and no bird sings so sweetly as they do, but we are expressly told that Caimi did not reach Varallo till the end of the year, and the passeri solitarii have all migrated by the end of August. We have seen, however, that Milano Scarrognini actually founded a chapel in October 1491, so Torrotti is wrong in his date, and Caimi may have come in 1490, and per- haps in August, before the passeri were gone. There can be little doubt in fact that he came, or at any rate chose his site, before i486. Whatever the bird may have been, Caimi now communicated his design to the Consiglio della Vicinanza at Varallo, through Milano de* Scarrognini, who was a member of the body, and who also gave support in money ; nego- tiations were not finally concluded until the 14th of April 1493, on which day, as we have BERNARDINO CAIMI. 43 already seen, the site of the monastery of S. Maria della Grazie was conveyed to the Padri deir Osservanza with the concession of a right to build their New Jerusalem on the adjoining mountain — which they had already begun to do for some time past. Divine assistance was manifest in the ease with which everything had been arranged, but Torrotti goes on to assure us that it was pre- sently made still clearer. The design had been to begin with a reproduction of the Holy Sepulchre, and hardly had the workmen begun to dig for the foundation of this first work, when a stone was found, not only resembling the one which covered the actual Holy Sepul- chre itself, but an absolute fac-simile of it in all respects — as like it, in fact, or even more so, than Varallo was to Jerusalem. The testimony to this was so notorious, and the fact was so soon and widely known, that pilgrims flocked in crowds and brought gifts enough to bring the first abode of the Fathers with the chapel beside it to a speedy and successful completion. Everything having been now started auspici- ously, and the Blessed Bernardino having been allowed to look, as it were, into the promised land, God took him to Himself on the 5th day of the Ides of February 1496, or — as I have above 44 EX VOTO. said that the inscription on Caimi's tomb de- clares — in 1499. The churches, both the one below the moun- tain in which Gaudenzio's great series of frescoes may be still seen, and the one on the top, which stood on the site now occupied by the large house that stands to the right of the present church, and is called the Casino, were con- secrated between the 5th and 7th days of September 1501, and by this time several of the chapels with figures in them had been taken in hand, and were well advanced if not completed. Fassola's version of Bernardino Caimi's visit is more guarded than Torrotti's is. Before going on to it I will say here the little that need be said about Fassola himself. I find from Signor Galloni's '' Uomini e fatti" (p. 208) that he was born at Rassa above Bucioleto in the Val Grande, on the 19th of September 1648. His family had one house at Rassa, and another at Varallo, which last is believed to have been what is now the hotel Croce Bianca, at which I always myself stay. Torrotti, in his preface, claims to have been one of his masters ; he also says that Fassola was only eighteen when he wrote his work on the Sacro Monte, and that he had published a work when he was FASSOLA, 45 only fourteen. The note given by Signor Gallon! [p. 233] settles it that Fassola was born ** anno D. 1648 die 19 septembris hora 22 min. 30," so that either the book lay some years unpublished, or he was over twenty when he wrote it. Like the edition of Caccia already referred to, it is dated a year later than the one in which it actually appeared, so that the pre- sent custom of post-dating late autumn books is not a new one. In the preface the writer speaks of his pen as being '' tenera non tanto per talento quanto per I'eta." In the same preface he speaks of himself as having a double capacity, one as a Delegate to the governing body of the valley, and the other as a canon ; but he must mean some kind of lay canon, for I cannot find that he was ever ordained. In 1672 he published his work ** La Valsesia descritta,'' which according to Signor Galloni is more hastily written than his earlier work. On the 14th of December, the same year, he left the Valsesia and travelled to France, keeping a journal for some time, which Signor Galloni tells us still existed in 1873 in the possession of Abate Cav. Carestia of Riva Valdobbia. He went to Paris, and appears to have stayed there till 1683, when he returned to Varallo, and the Valsesia. 46 EX VOTO. He found his country torn by faction, and was immediately hailed by all parties as the one man whom all could agree to elect as Regent General of the Valley. He was elected, and on the 5th of October convened his first general council of the Valsesia. He seems to have been indefatigable as an administrator during the short time he held office, but in the year 1684 was deposed by the Milanese, who on the 3rd of December sent a body of armed men to seize him and take him to Milan. He was warned in time to fly, and escaped to France, where according to some he died, while others say that he settled in Poland and there attained high distinction. Nothing, however, is known for certain about him later than the year 1684 or the beginning of 1685. In 1686 Torrotti published his book. He says that Fassola during his regency repeatedly desired him '* ripigliare questa relatione per commodita dei Pelegrini, Divoti, visitanti," and that so much new matter had come to light since Fassola's time that a new work was called for. Fassola, he says, even in the midst of his terrible misfortunes, continued to take the warmest interest in his native city, and in the Sacro Monte, where it appears he had been saluted by a very memorable and well-known FASSOLA. 47 miracle, which was so well known in Torrotti's time that it was not necessary to tell us what it was. Fassola may or may not have urged Torrotti to write a second work upon the Sacro Monte, but he can hardly have intended him to make it little more than a transcript of his own book. If new facts had come to light they do not appear in Torrotti's pages. He very rarely adds to Fassola, and never corrects him ; when Fassola is wrong Torrotti is wrong also ; even when something is added I have a strong suspicion that it comes from Fassola's second book. On the whole I am afraid I regard Torrotti as somewhat of a plagiarist — at least as regards his matter, for his manner is his own and is very quaint, garrulous, and pleasing. Fassola's work is full of inaccuracies, and of such inaccuracies as can only be explained on the supposition that the writer resided mainly at Rassa, wrote his book there, and relied too much upon notes which he did not verify after his work was written. Nevertheless, as Signor Galloni justly says, '' he must be allowed the merit of having preserved an immense mass of matter from otherwise almost certain destruc- tion, and his pages when subjected to rigid examination and criticism furnish abundant material to the writer of genuine history." 48 EX VOTO. He leans generally much less towards the miraculous than Torrotti does. After saying, for example, that Bernardino Caimi had re- turned from Jerusalem in 148 1 full of devotion and with the fixed intention of reproducing the Holy City on Italian soil, he continues : — " With this holy intent the good ecclesiastic journeyed to the mountains of Biella, and thence to the Val d' Ossola, and thence to several places in the Valsesia, which of all others was the valley in which he was most inclined to unburden his mind of the treasure of his heroic design. Finally, arriving at Varallo, as the place of most resort, where most of those would come whose means and goodwill would in- cline them to works of piety, he resolved to choose the most suitable site that he could here find. According to some, while taking counsel with himself and with all who could help him, the site which we now adore was shown him in a vision ; others say that on walking without the town he was seduced by the angelic warbling of a bird, and thus ravished to a spot where he found all things in such order for his design that he settled upon it then and there. Many hold as true the story of certain shepherds who about a fortnight earlier than the coming of the father, heard songs of more than earthly sweetness as they were keeping watch over their flocks by night." '* But," concludes Fassola, with some naivet6 considering the reserve he has shown in accept- ing any of the foregoing stories, '' take it in what- ever way you will, the inception of the place was obviously miraculous." ( 49 ) CHAPTER V. EARLY HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. Whether miraculous or not, the early history of the Sacro Monte is undoubtedly obscure, and the reader will probably have ere this per- ceived that the accounts given by Fassola and Torrotti stand in some need of reconstruction. The resemblance between Varallo and Jerusa- lem is too far fetched to have had any bond fide effect upon a man of travel and of affairs, such as Caimi certainly was ; it is hardly greater than the famous one between Monmouth and Macedon ; there is, indeed, a river — not to say two — at Varallo, and there is a river also only twenty-five miles off Jerusalem; doubtless atone time or another there have been crucifixions in both, but some other reason must be sought for the establishment of a great spiritual strong- hold at the foot of the Alps, than a mere desire to find the place which should most remind its founder of the Holy City. Why this great so EX VOTO. effort in a remote and then almost inaccessible province of the Church, far from any of the religious centres towards which one would have expected it to gravitate ? The answer suggests itself as readily as the question ; namely, that it was an attempt to stem the torrent of reformed doctrines already surging over many an Alpine pass, and threatening a moral invasion as fatal to the spiritual power of Rome as earlier phy- sical invasions of Northm'en had been to her material power. Those who see the Italian sub-alpine valleys of to-day as devoted to the Church of Rome are apt to forget how nearly they fell away from her in the sixteenth and seventeeth centuries, and what efforts, both by way of punishment and allurement, she was compelled to make before she could retain them in her grasp. In most of them the ferment caused by the intro- duction of the reformed doctrines was in the end stamped out ; but in some, as in the Valle di Poschiavo, and the Val Bregaglia, Protes- tantism is still either the predominant creed or not uncommon. I do not mention the Vaudois valleys of Piedmont, for I am told these were Protestant before either Huss or Luther preached. The Valsesians had ere now given proof of HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 51 a tendency towards heresy, but they were a people whom it was worth while making every effort to retain. They have ever been, as we have seen it said already, a vigorous, sturdy, independent race, imbued, in virtue perhaps of their mixed descent, with a large share of the good points both of Southern and Northern nations. They are Italians ; but Italians of the most robust and Roman type, combining in a remarkable degree Southern grace and versa- tility with Northern enterprise and power of endurance. It is no great stretch of imagina- tion to suppose that Bernardino Caimi was alive to dangers that were sufficiently obvious, and that he began with the Val Sesia, partly as of all the sub-alpine valleys the one most imbued with German blood — the one in which to this day the German language has lingered longest, and in which, therefore, ideas derived from Germany would most easily be established — and partly because of the quasi-independence of the Val Sesia, and of its lying out of the path of those wars from which the plains of Lom- bardy have been rarely long exempt. It may be noted that the movement set on foot by Caimi extended afterwards to other places, always, with the exception of Crea, on the last slopes of the Alps before the plains of Lombardy 52 EX VOTO. and Piedmont begin. Varese, Locarno, Orta, Varallo, Oropa, Graglia, St. Ignazio, not to mention St. Giovanni di Andorno, have all of them something of the spiritual frontier fortress about them, and, I imagine, are all more or less directly indebted to the reformation for their inception. Confining our attention to Varallo, the history of the Sacro Monte divides itself into two main periods ; the first, from the foundation to the visit of S. Carlo Borromeo in 1678 ; the second, from the visit of S. Carlo to the present day. The first of these periods begins with i486, in which year the present Sacro Monte was no doubt formally contemplated, if not actually commenced. That it was contemplated is shown by the inscription on Caimi's grave already given, and also by the first of the two deeds given in Signor Galloni's notes, from which it appears^ that under the brief of December 21, i486, Caimi had powers to take over the land now covered by the chapels, even though he should be absent — it being evidently intended that the land should be conveyed at once, and before he could return from Jerusa- lem, for which place he started in 1487. More- over, there remains one small chapel with * " Uomini e fatti," p. 83. HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 53 frescoes that can hardly be later than 1485- 1490. This is now numbered 45, and is sup- posed by many to be older even than Caimi's first visit. It may be so, but there is nothing to show that it actually was. I have seen a date scratched on it which it is said is 1437, but the four is really a five, which in old writing is often taken for a four, and the frescoes, which in their own way are of considerable merit, would be most naturally assigned to about the date 1 48 5- 1 490. I do not think there can be a doubt that we have in this chapel the earliest existing building on the Sacro Monte, but find it impossible to form any opinion as to whether it was in existence before Bernardino Caimi's time, or no. In the second of the two deeds given by Signor Galloni (p. 85), the following passage occurs : — ** Et similiter fecerunt ipsi Sindici, et Procuratores, ut suprk introducendo ipsum Patrem Vicarium ut suprk in Eremitorium sancti Sepulchri existent, in loco ubi dicebatur super pariete, aperiendo eidem ostia dicti Eremitorij, et dando eidem claues Ostiorum dicti eremitorij, et eum deambulari faciendo in eo, et similiter in Hortis dicti Eremi- torij, dando eidem in gremium ut suprk de terris, herbis, et frondibus, et lapidibus existen. in locis praedictis, ef similiter in Capella existente subtus crucem^ et in Capellam Ascensionis ^dificatant super Monte prcedicto. Qui locus est de membris dicti Monasterii suprascripti." 54 EX VOTO. Neither Signer Galloni, who pointed out this passage to me, nor I, though we have more than once discussed the matter on the ground itself, can arrive at any conclusion as to what was intended by " the chapel now in existence under the cross," nor yet what chapel is intended by '' the chapel of the Ascension on the said mountain." It is probable that there was an early chapel of the Ascension, and the wooden figure of Christ on the fountain in the piazza before the church was very likely taken from it, but there is no evidence to show where it stood. Signor Arienta tells me that the chapel now occupied by the Temptation in the Wilderness was formerly a chapel of the Ascension. He told me to go round to the back of this chapel, and I should find it was earlier than appeared from the front. I did so, and saw it had formerly fronted the other way to what it does now, but among the many dates scrawled on it could find none earlier than 1506, and it is not likely to have been built thirteen years before it got scrawled on. Some hold the chapels referred to in the deed above quoted from to have included the present Annunciation, Salutation, and sleeping St. Joseph block — or part of it. Others hold HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 55 them to have referred to the chapels now filled by the Pieta and the Entombment (Nos. 40 and 41) ; but it should not be forgotten that by 1493 the chapels of S. Francis and the Holy Sepul- chre were already in existence, though no men- tion is made of them ; and there may have been other chapels also already built of which no mention is made. Thus immediately out- side the St. Francis chapel and towards* the door leading to the Holy Sepulchre, there is a small recess in which is placed an urn of iron that contains the head of Bernardino Caimi with a Latin inscription ; and hard by there is another inscription which runs as follows : — "Magnificus D. Milanus Scarrogninus hoc Sepulcrum cum fabrica sibi contigua Christo posuit die septimo Octobris MCCCCLXXXXI. R. P. Frater Bernardinus de Mediolano Ordinis Minorum de Observ. sacra hujus mentis excogitavit loca, ut hie Hierusalem videat qui peragrare nequit." We may say with some confidence that the present chapel No. 45, those numbered 40 and 41, the block containing the St. Francis and Holy Sepulchre chapels, and probably the Presepio, Adoration of the Shepherds, and Circumcision chapels — though it may be doubted whether these last contained the figures that they now do — were in existence 56 EX VOTO. before the year 1500. Part if not all of the block containing the Sta. Casa di Loreto, in which the Annunciation is now found, is also probably earlier than 1500, as also an early Agony in the Garden now long destroyed, but of which we are told that the figures were originally made of wood. Over and above these there was a Cena, Capture, Flagellation, and an Ascension chapel, all of which contained wooden figures, and cannot be dated later than the three or four earliest years of the sixteenth century. No wooden figure is to be dated later than this, for when once an oven for baking clay had been made (and this must have been done soon after Gaudenzio took the works on the Sacro Monte in hand) the use of wood was discarded never to be resumed. According to both Fassola and Torrotti, the first chapel erected on the Sacro Monte was that of S. Francesco, with its adjacent reproduc- tion of the Holy Sepulchre. According to Bordiga the first was the entombment, con- taining nine figures of wood, or, as the earlier writers say, eight. Bordiga probably means that the Entombment was the earliest chapel with figures in it, and the other writers that the St. Francis chapel was the first in which HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 57 mass was said. These last speak very highly of the wooden figures in the Entombment chapel, and so more guardedly does Bordiga. I will return to them when I come to the pre- sent group of nine by Luigi Marchesi, a sculptor of Saltrio, which were substituted for the old ones in 1826. The early writers say that there was no fresco background to this chapel, and this suggests that the attempt to combine sculpture and painting was not part of the initial scheme, though soon engrafted on to it, inas- much as this is the only chapel about which I find it expressly stated by early writers that it was without a fresco background (*'senza pittura alcuna '').'^''' Though there was no fresco background, Bordiga says there was a fresco painted, doubtless done very early in his career, by Gaudenzio Ferrari, outside the chapel just above the iron grating through which the visitor must look. Probably the original scheme was to have sculptured figures inside the chapels, and frescoes outside ; by an easy modification these last were transferred from the outside to the inside, and so designed as to form an integral part of the composition : the daring scheme of combining the utmost resources of both painting and sculpture in a * Fassola, p. 112. 58 EX VOTO, single work was thus gradually evolved rather than arrived at per saltum. Assuming, how- ever, the currently received date of 1503 or 1504 as correct for Gaudenzio's frescoes in the present Pieta chapel, the conception as carried out in the greater number of the existing chapels had then attained the shape from which no subsequent departure was made. Returning to Gaudenzio's fresco outside the S. Francesco chapel, Bordiga says that Caccia gave the following lines on this work : — '* Sotto un vicino portico di fuore Portato a sepelir h di pittura Un Cristo ; che non mai Zeuxi pittore Di questo finse piu bella figura, Che un San Francesco possa pareggiare, Pinto piu inanzi sopra d' un altare." The reader will note that the fresco is here expressly stated to be '' di fuore '' or outside and not inside the chapel. Both Fassola and Torrotti place this fresco on the outside wall of the chapel of St. Francis, but Bordiga is probably right in saying it was on the Entombment chapel. No trace of it re- mains, nor yet of the other works by Gaudenzio, which all three writers agree were in the S. Francesco chapel, though they must all have been some few years later than the chapel HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 59 itself. These consisted of portraits of Milano Scarrognini with Father Beato Candido Ranzo Bernardino Caimi upon the gospel, or right, side of the altar, and of Scarrognini's wife and son with Bernardino Caimi, on the epistle side. According to Bordiga, Gaudenzio also painted a St. Anthony of Padua, and a St. Helena, one on either side the grating. Inside the chapel over the altar was a painting of St. Francis receiving the stigmata, also by Gaudenzio. This is the only one of his works in or about the S. Francesco chapel which still exists ; it is now in the pinacoteca of the Museum at Varallo, but is not, so far as I could judge of it, one of his best pictures. The other works were in a decayed condition in 1 703, when they were removed, and the chapel was redecorated by Francesco Leva, a painter of Milan. The Crucifixion chapel of Gaudenzio Ferrari was begun and finished between 1520 and 1530. I have found three excellently written dates of 1529 scrawled upon the fresco back- ground. One of them, '* 1529 Die 26 Octobre Johannes Antoninus," is especially clear, and the other two leave no doubt what year was intended. I have found no earlier date, but should not be surprised if further search were more successful. I may say in passing that it 6o EX VOTO. seemed to me as though some parts of the scar made by the inscription had been filled with paint, while others had certainly not — as though the work had been in parts retouched, not so very long ago. I think this is so, but two or three to whom I showed what I took to be the new colour were not convinced, so I must leave others to decide the point. The Magi chapel must be assigned to some date between the years 1 530 and 1 539 — I should say probably to about 1538, but I will return to this later on. Torrotti says that some of the figures on the Christ taken for the last time before Pilate (chapel No. 32) are by Gaudenzio, as also some paintings that were preserved when the Palazzo di Pilato was built, but I can see no sign of either one or the other now ; nevertheless it is likely enough that several figures — transformed as we shall presently see that d'Enrico or his assistants knew very well how to transform them — are doing duty in the Caiaphas, Herod, Pilate, and Ecce Homochapels. So cunningly did the workmen of that time disguise a figure when they wanted to alter its character and action that it would be no easy matter to find out exactly what was done ; if they could turn an Eve, as they did, into a very passable Roman soldier assisting at the HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 6i capture of Christ, they could make anything out of anything. A figure was a figure, and was not to be thrown away lightly. Soon after the completion of the Magi chapel the work flagged in consequence of the wars then devastating the provinces of North Italy ; nevertheless by the middle of the sixteenth century we learn from Torrotti that some nine- teen chapels had been completed. It is idle to spend much time in guessing which these chapels were, when Caccia s work, published in 1565, is sure to be found some day and will settle the matter authoritatively, but the reader will not be far wrong if he sees the Sacro Monte by the year 1550 as consisting of the following chapels : Adam and Eve, An- nunciation, Salutation (?), Magi, Adoration of the Infant Jesus by the Shepherds, Adoration by Joseph and Mary, Circumcision, (but not the present figures nor fresco background), Last Supper, Agony in the Garden, Capture, Flagel- lation, Crowning with thorns (?), Christ taken for the last time before Pilate, the Original journey to Calvary, Fainting Madonna, Cruci- fixion, Entombment, Ascension, and the old church of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary now removed. There were probably one or two others, but there cannot have been many. 62 EX VOTO, In the 1586 edition of Caccia, a MS. copy of which I have before me, the chapels are given as follows : Adam and Eve, Annuncia- tion, and Santa Casa di Loreto, Visit of Mary to Elizabeth, Magi, Joseph and Mary worship- ping the Infant Christ, and the Adoration of Shepherds,^ Circumcision, Joseph warned to fly, the chapel (but not the figures) of the Massacre of the Innocents, Flight into Egypt Baptism, Temptation in the Wilderness, Woman of Samaria, the chapel (but not the figures) of the Healing of the Paralytic, and the Raising of the Widow's son at Nain, the Raising of Lazarus, Entry of Christ into Jerusalem, the Last Supper, Agony in the Garden, Capture, Flagellation, Crowning with thorns, Christ carrying His cross to Calvary (doubtless Tabachetti's chapel), the Fainting of the Virgin, the earlier Journey to Calvary by Gaudenzio (now dispersed or destroyed). Crucifixion, Pieta, Holy Sepulchre, Appearance to Mary Magdalene (now no longer existing). I should say, however, that I find it impos- sible to reconcile the two accounts of the journeys to Calvary, given in the prose in- * These chapels are grouped together in the 1586 edition as "la nativitk di N.S. nel Presepio," but they are separated, as they doubtless should have been earlier, in the edition ofi59o[i59i]. HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 63 troduction to this work, and in the poetical description that follows it, or rather to under- stand the topography of the poetical version at all, for the prose account is plain enough. I shall place a MS. copy of the 1586 edition of Caccia's book in the British Museum, before this present volume is published, and will leave other students of Valsesian history to be more fortunate if they can. Poetical descriptions are so far better than prose, inasmuch as there is generally less of them in a page, but on the whole prose has the advantage. It would be interesting to see the 1565 and 1576 editions of Caccia, and note the changes and additions that can be found in them. The differences between the 1586 and 1590 editions (dated 1587 and 1591 — the preface to the second being dated September 25, 1589), are enough to throw considerable additional light upon the history of the place, and if, as I believe likely, we find no mention of Tabachetti's Calvary chapel in the edition of 1576, nor of his other chapels, we should be able to date his arrival at Varallo within a very few years, and settle a question which, until these two editions of Caccia are found, appears insoluble. I must be myself content with pointing out these /idrz desiderati to the future historian. 64 EX VOTO. Some say that the work on the Sacro Monte was almost discontinued between the years 1540 and 1580. I cannot, however, find that this was so, though it appears to have some- what flagged. I cannot tell whether Taba- chetti came to Varallo before S. Carlo or after him. If before, then a good deal of the second impetus may be due to the sculptor rather than to the saint ; if after, and as a consequence of S. Carlo's visit, then indeed S. Carlo must be considered as the second founder of the place ; but whatever view is taken about this, S. Carlo's visit in 1578 is convenient as marking a new departure in the history of the Sacro Monte, and he may be fairly called its second founder. Giussano gives the following account of his first visit, which makes us better understand the austere expression that reigns on S. Carlo's face, as we see it represented in his portraits :— " It was two o'clock in the day before St. Charles arrived at this place, and he had not broken his fast, but before taking anything he visited the different chapels for medita- tion, of which Father Adorno gave him the points. As evening drew on, he withdrew to take his refection of bread and water, and then returned again to the chapels till after midnight though the weather was very cold " [end of October or beginning of November]. "He then took two hours' rest on a chair, and at five o'clock in the morning resumed his devotions ; then, after having said his Mass, he again HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 65 allowed himself a small portion of bread and water, and continued his journey to Milan, renewed in fervour of spirit, and with a firm determination to begin again to serve God with greater energy than ever." * Surely one may add '^ according to his lights " after the words '' to serve God." The second visit of St. Charles to Varallo, a few days before his death, is even more painful reading, and the reader may be referred for an account of it to chapter xi. of the second volume of the work last quoted from. He had a cell in the cloister, where he slept on a wooden bed, which is still shown and venerated, and used to spend hours in contemplating the various sacred mysteries, but most especially the Agony in the Garden, near which a little shelter was made for him, and in which he was praying when his impend- ing death was announced to him by an angel. But this chapel, which was near the present Transfiguration Chapel, was destroyed and re- built on its present site after his death, as also the Cena Chapel, which originally contained frescoes by Bernardino Lanini. It was on the Sacro Monte that S. Carlo discharged his last public functions, after which, feeling that he had taken a chill, he left Varallo on the 29th * English translation of the "Life of St. Charles Borromeo," with pre- face by Cardinal Manning. Burns & Oates, London and New York, 1884, vol. ii. p. 47. E 66 EX VOTO. of October 1584, and died at Milan six days afterwards. At S. Carlo's instance Pellegrino Pellegrini, called Tibaldi, made a new design for the Sacro Monte, which was happily never carried out, but which I am told involved the destruction of many of the earlier chapels. He made the plan of the Sacro Monte as it stood in his time, which I have already referred to, and designed the many chapels mentioned in the 1586 edition of Caccia as about to be built. Prominent among these was the Temple of Solomon, which was to involve '' una spesa grandissimay' and was to be as like the real temple as it could be made. Inside it were to be groups of figures represent- ing Christ driving out those that bought and sold, and it was to have a magnificent marble portico. The Palazzo di Pilato, which, as the name denotes, is devoted to the sufferings of Christ under Pontius Pilate, was actually carried out, though not till some years after S. Carlo's death, and not according to Pellegrini's design. It is most probable that the designer of the Palazzo di Pilato, and of the Caiaphas and Herod chapels as we now see them, was Giovanni d' Enrico. " It was in 1608," says Bordiga,* ♦ " Storia a Guida,'' ed. 1857, Varallo, p. 68. HISTORY OF THE SACRO MONTE. 67 writing of the Santa Scala, which leads from the Crowning with Thorns to the Ecce Homo chapels, and which, one would say, must have been one of the first things done when the Palazzo di Pilato was made, *' that this work with its steps, exactly twenty-eight in number, was begun, according to the design obtained from Rome by Francesco Testa, who was then Fabbriciere. This is for the informa- tion of those who think it is the work of Pellegrini/' Between this year and 1645 the four Pilate chapels, the Ecce Homo, Caiaphas, Herod, present Pieta, Sleeping Apostles, Agony in the Garden, and Christ Nailed to the Cross chapels were either created or reconstructed. These works bear d'Enrico's name in the guide-books, and he no doubt presided over the work that was done in them ; but I should say that by far the greater number of the figures in them are by Giacomo Ferro, his assistant, to whom I will return presently, or by other pupils and assis- tants. Only one chapel, the Transfiguration, belongs to the second half of the seventeenth century, and one, the Christ before Annas, to the eighteenth (1765); one — the present En- tombment — belongs to the nineteenth, and one or two have been destroyed, as has been unfor- 68 EX VOTO. tunately the case with the Chiesa Vecchia ; but the plan of the Sacro Monte in 1671, which I here give, will show that it was not much different then from what it is at present. The numbers on the chapels are explained as follows : — I. Gate. 27. Christ sent again to Pilate. 2. Creation of the world and 28. Flagellation. Adam and Eve. 29. Crowning with thorns. 3. Annunciation, 30. Christ about to ascend the 4- Salutation. Santa Scala (not shown on 5. First Vision of St. Joseph, plan). 6. Magi. 31. Ecce Homo. 7. Nativity, 32. Pilate washes his hands. 8. Circumcision. 33. Christ condemned to death. 9. Second Vision of St. Joseph. 34. Christ carrying the Cross. 10. Flight into Egypt. 35. Nailing to the Cross. II. Massacre of the Innocents. 36. Passion. 12. Baptism. 37. Deposition from the Cross. 13. Temptation. 38. Pieta. 14. Woman of Samaria. 39. Entombment (not shown on 15. Healing the Paralytic. plan). 16. Widow's son at Nain. 40. Chapel of St. Francis. 17. Transfiguration. 41. Holy Sepulchre. 18. Raising of Lazarus. 42. Appearance to Mary Magda- 19. Entry into Jerusalem. lene. 20. Last Supper. 43- Infancy of the Virgin. 21. Agony in the Garden. 44. Sepulchre of the Virgin. 22. Sleeping Apostles. 45. Sepulchre of St. Anne. 23. Capture. 46. Ascended Christ over the 24. Caiaphas, and Penitence of fountain. St. Peter, 47. Chiesa Vecchia. 25. Christ before Pilate. 48. Chiesa Maggiore. 26. Christ before Herod. The view is a bird's-eye one, and there is hardly any hill in reality. Plan of the Sacro Monte in 1671. Face p. ( 69 ) CHAPTER VI. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. The foregoing outline of the history of the work must suffice for the present. I will reserve further remarks for the space which I will devote to each individual chapel. As regards the particular form the work took, I own that I have been at times inclined to wonder whether Leonardo da Vinci may not have had something to do with it. Between 1481 and the end of 1499 he was in Milan, and during the later years of this period was the chief authority on all art matters. It is not easy to think that Caimi, who was a Milanese, would not consult him before embark- ing upon an art enterprise of the first magni- tude ; and certainly there is a something in the idea of turning the full strength of both painting and sculpture at once on to a single subject, which harmonises well with the magnificent rash- ness of which we know Leonardo to have been 70 EX VOTO. capable, and with the fact that he was both a painter and a sculptor himself. There is, how- ever, not one scrap of evidence in support of this view, which is based solely on the fact that both the scheme and Leonardo were audacious, and that the first is little likely to have been undertaken without counsel from the second. The actual evidence points rather, as already indicated, in the direction of thinking that the frescoes began outside the chapels, got inside them for shelter, and ere long claimed the premises as belonging no less to themselves than to the statues. The idea of treating full- relief sculptured figures with a view to a pictorial rather than sculpturesque effect was in itself, as undertaken when Gaudenzio was too young to have had a voice in the matter, a daring innovation, even without the adjunct of a fresco background ; and the idea of taking a mountain as though it were a book, and illustrating it with a number of such groups, was more daring still. To this extent we may perhaps suppose Caimi to have been indebted to Leonardo da Vinci : the rest is probably due to Gaudenzio, who evolved it in the course of those unforeseen developments of which design and judgment are never slow to take advantage. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. it To whomsoever the conception may be due, if it had only been carried out by such artists as Tabachetti and Gaudenzio Ferrari, or even Giovanni d^Enrico, to say nothing of Barg- nola or Rossetti, (to whichever of the two the Massacre of the Innocents must be assigned,) works like those at Varallo might have been repeated, as indeed they sometimes were, thence- forward to the present day. Unfortunately the same thing was attempted at Orta, and later on at Varese, by greatly inferior men. It is true that some of the groups at Varese, especially the one in the Disputa Chapel, are exceedingly fine, and that there are few chapels even there in which no good or even admirable figures may be found. Still the prevailing spirit at Varese is stagey ; the work belongs to an age when art of all kinds was held to consist mainly in exaggeration, and when freedom from affecta- tion had fallen into a disrepute from which it has taken centuries to emerge. Nevertheless the work at Varese is for the most part able ; if at times somewhat boisterous and ranting, it is incomparably above the feeble, silly cant of Orta ; but unfortunately it is by Orta that English people for the most part judge the attempt to combine sculpture and painting. It is indeed some years since I was at this last-named place, 72 EX VOTO. and remembering how long I knew the Sacro Monte at Varallo without observing the Vec- chietto in the Descent from the Cross Chapel, I cannot be sure that there is not some more interesting work at Orta than I now know. I do not think, however, I am far wrong in say- ing that the chapels at Orta are for the most part exceedingly bad. So are some even at Varallo itself, but as- suredly not most of them. One — I mean, of course, Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary, which contains about forty figures rather larger than life, and nine horses, — is of such superlative excellence as regards composition and dramatic power, to say nothing of the many admirable individual figures comprised in it, that it is not too much to call it the most astounding work that has ever been achieved in sculpture. I know that this is strong language, but have considered my words as much as I care to do. As Michael Angelo's Medicean Chapel errs on the side of over-subtlety, refinement, and the exaggerated idealism from which indeed there is but one step to the barocco, so does Tabachetti's on that of over-downrightness, or, as a critic with a cultivated eye might say, with perhaps a show of reason at a first glance, even of vul- garity. Nevertheless, if I could have my choice PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 73 whether to have created Michael Angelo's chapel or Tabachetti's, I should not for a moment hesitate about choosing Tabachetti's, though it drove its unhappy creator mad, which the Medicean chapel never did by Michael Angelo. Three other chapels by Tabachetti are also admirable works. Two chapels con- tain very extensive frescoes by Gaudenzio Ferrari, than which it is safe to say that no finer works of their kind have been preserved to us. The statues by Gaudenzio in the same chapels are all interesting, and some remark- ably good. Their arrangement in the Cruci- fixion Chapel, if not marked by the superlative dramatic power of Tabachetti, is still solemn, dignified, and impressive. The frescoes by Morazzone in Tabachetti's great chapel belong to the decline of art, but there is still much in them that is excellent. So there is in some of those by Tanzio and Melchiorre, Giovanni d'Enrico's brothers. Giovanni d'Enrico's Nail- ing of Christ to the Cross, with its sixty figures all rather larger than life, challenges a compari- son with Tabachetti's, which it will not bear; still it is a great work. So are several of his other chapels. I am not so thoroughly in sympathy with the work of any of the three brothers d' Enrico as I should like to be, but they can- 74 EX VOTO. not be ignored or spoken of without respect. There are excellent figures in some of the chapels by less well-known men ; and lastly, there is the Vecchietto, perhaps the finest figure of all, who looks as if he had dropped straight from the heavens towards which he is stead- fastly regarding, and of whom nothing is known except that, if not by Tabachetti, he must be by a genius in some respects even more com- manding, who has left us nothing save this Melchizedek of a figure, without father, mother, or descent. I have glanced at some of the wealth in store for those who will explore it, but at the same time I cannot pretend that even the greater number of the chapels on the Sacro Monte are above criticism ; and unfortunately some of the best do not come till the visitor, if he takes them in the prescribed order, has already seen a good many, and is beginning to be tired. There is not a little to be said in favour of taking them in the reverse order. As when one has sampled several figures in a chapel and found them commonplace, one is apt to overlook a good one which may have got in by accident of shifting in some one of the several rearrangements made in the course of more than three centuries, so when sampling PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 75 the chapels themselves, after finding half a dozen running which are of inferior merit, we approach the others with a bias against them. Moreover, all of them have suffered more or less severely from decay. Rain and snow, indeed, can hardly get right inside the chapels, or, at any rate, not inside most of them, but they are all open to the air, and, at a height of over two thousand feet, ages of winter damp have dimmed the glory even of the best-pre- served. In many cases the hair and beards, with excess of realism, were made of horse hair glued on, and the glue now shows unplea- santly ; while the paint on many of the faces and dresses has blistered or peeled, leaving the figures with a diseased and mangy look. In other cases, they have been scraped and repainted, and this process has probably been repeated many times over, with inevitable loss of character ; for the paint, unless very carefully removed, must soon clog up and conceal deli- cate modelling in many parts of the face and hands. The new paint has often been of a shiny, oleaginous character, and this will go far to vulgarise even a finely modelled figure, giving it something of the look of a Highlander outside a tobacconist's shop. I am glad to see that Professor Burlazzi, in repainting the 76 EX VOTO. Adam and Eve in the first chapel, has used dead colour, as was done by Tabachetti in his Journey to Calvary. As the figures have often become mangy, so the frescoes are with few exceptions injured by damp and mould. The expense of keeping up so many chapels must be very heavy ; it is surprising, therefore, that the general state of repair should be as good as it is. Nevertheless, there is not a chapel which does not require some effort of the imagination before the mind's eye can see it as it was when left by those who made it. Unless the reader feels equal to this effort, — and enough remains to make it a very pos- sible one — he had better stick to the Royal Academy and Grosvenor Exhibitions. It should go without saying that a work of art, if con- sidered at all, must be held to be as it was when first completed. If we could see Gaudenzio Ferrari's Crucifixion Chapel with its marvellous frescoes as strong and fresh in colour as they were three centuries and a half ago, and with its nearly thirty life-sized human figures and horses in good condition — not forgetting that, whatever Sir Henry Layard may say to the contrary, they are all by one hand; if, again, Tabachetti's great work was seen by us as it was seen by Tabachetti, and Morazzone's really PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 77 fine background were not disfigured by damp and mildew, it can hardly be doubted that even ."a cultivated eye" would find little difficulty in seeing these two chapels as among the very finest triumphs that have been vouchsafed to human genius ; and surely, if this be so, it follows that we should rate them no lower even now. Gaudenzio Ferrari's Crucifixion Chapel, regarded as a single work, conceived and exe- cuted by a single artist, who aimed with one intention at the highest points ever attained both by painting and sculpture, and who wielded on a very large scale, in connection with what was then held to be the sublimest and most solemn of conceivable subjects, the fullest range of all the resources available by either, must stand as perhaps the most daringly ambitious attempt that has been made in the history of art. As regards the frescoes, the success was as signal as the daring ; and even as regards the sculpture, the work cannot be said to have failed. Gaudenzio the sculptor will not indeed compare with Gaudenzio the painter ; still less will he compare with Tabachetti either as a modeller or composer of full-relief figures ; but Tabachetti did not paint his own background as well as make his figures, and something must always be allowed to those who are carry- 78 EX VOTO. ing double. Moreover, Tabachetti followed, whereas Gaudenzio led as pioneer in a realm of art never hitherto attempted. Nevertheless, I may be allowed to say that, notwithstanding all Gaudenzio's greatness, I find Tabachetti the strongest and most robust of all the great men who have left their mark on the Sacro Monte at Varallo. We cannot dismiss such works with cheap commonplaces about Madame Tussaud's — and for aught I know there may be some very good stuff at Madame Tussaud's — or sneer at them as though they must be all much of a much- ness, and because the Orta chapels are bad, therefore those at Varallo must be so also. Those who confine themselves to retailing what they take to be art-tips gathered from our leading journals of culture, will probably continue to trade on this not very hardly earned capital, whatever may be urged upon the other side; but those who will take the trouble in- volved in forming an independent judgment may be encouraged to make investment of their effort here by remembering that Gaudenzio Ferrari ranks as among the few purest and most accomplished artists of the very culminat- ing period of Italian art, and that what he thought good enough to do may be well worth PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 79 our while to consider with the best attention we can give to it. Another point should not be forgotten by those who would form their opinion intelligently. I mean, that they are approaching a class of work with which they are unfamiliar, and must not, therefore, expect to be able to make up their minds about it as they might if the ques- tion were one either of painting or sculpture only. Sculpture and painting are here integral parts of a single design, and it is some little time before we grasp this conception so fully to be able to balance duly the merits and demerits of different compositions, even though we eventually get to see that there is an im- measurable distance between the best and worst. I now know, for example, that Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary is greatly finer than Giovanni d'Enrico's Nailing to the Cross. I see this so clearly that I find it difficult to conceive how I can have doubted about it. At the same time, I can remember thinking that one was nearly as good as the other, and this long after I should have found little difficulty in making up my mind about less complex works. ( 8o ) CHAPTER VII. AIM AND SCOPE OF THE SACRO MONTE, The difficulty referred to at the close of the last chapter is the same as that which those who rarely go to a theatre have to get over before they can appreciate an actor. They go to '' Macbeth " or '' Othello," expecting to find players speaking and acting on the stage much as they would in actual life ; and not finding this, are apt to think the acting coarse and unnatural. They forget that the physical conditions of the stage involve compliance with conventions from which there is no escape, and expect the players to play a game which the players themselves know to be impossible, and are not even trying to play. So important is it to understand the standpoint from which the artists at Varallo worked, that I shall venture some further re- marks upon their aim and scope before going on to the works themselves. Their object, or the object of those who com- AIM AND SCOPE OF THE SACRO MONTE. 8i missioned them, was to bring the scene with which they were engaged home to the spectator in all its fulness, short of actual life and motion ; but in this ** short of actual life and motion" what a cutting -out of the part of Hamlet is there not involved. We can spare a good deal of Hamlet ; but if the part is totally excised, — even though the Hamlet be Mr. Irving him- self, — the play must suffer. To try to represent action without the immediate changes of posi- tion and expression which are its most essential features, seems like courting defeat, and to a certain extent defeat does invariably follow the attempt to treat very violent rapid action except loosely and sketchily. Violent action carried to high degree of finish is hardly ever success- ful in painting or sculpture ; a crowd done in Michael Angelo's Medici chapel manner must inevitably fail, and if a crowd is to be treated in sculpture at all, Tabachetti's broad, large- brushed, and somewhat sketchy treatment is the one most to be preferred. In spite, how- ever, of the incomparable success of Tabachetti's work, I am tempted to question whether quiet and reposeful sculpture is not always most per- manently pleasing, as not involving so peremp- tory a demand for the change that cannot, of course, ensue. At any rate, as one lie generally 82 EX VOTO, leads to others, so with the attempt to render action without action's most essential character- istic, there is a departure from realism which involves a host of other departures if the error is to be distributed so as to avoid offence. In other words, convention, or a composition be- tween artist and spectator, whereby, in view of admitted bankruptcy and failure of possible payment in full, a less thing shall be taken as a greater, has superseded nature at a very early point in the proceedings. Nevertheless, within the limits of the com- position we expect to be paid in full ; whatever the dividend is we are to have all of it, and we sometimes take a different view of the terms of the settlement to that taken by those with whom we are dealing. It being admitted that the object of the Sacro Monte workmen was to bring a scene home to the spectator in all possible fulness, we expect to have a quotum of our own ideas of the scene, whatever they may be, put before us, and are more or less offended when we find a composition which we consider to be unreal even within its own covenanted limitations. The fault, however, rests greatly with ourselves, in forgetting that it must be the ideal of medieval Italians and not our own that we should look for, and that AIM AND SCOPE OF THE SACRO MONTE. 83 their ideas concerning the chief actors in the sacred dramas were not as ours are. For us, the oLot vvv /3/ooTOi el into the work with admirable skill, nevertheless they do not form part of design, and make it 112 EX VOTO. want the unity observable in the work of Tabachetti and Gaudenzio. They have been lugged into the composition, and no matter how skilful their introduction, are soon felt, as in the case of the Vecchietto, to have no business where they are. Moreover, D'Enrico shows his figures off, which Tabachetti never does : the result is that in his chapels each figure has its attention a good deal drawn to the desir- ableness of neither being itself lost sight of, nor impeding the view of its neighbours. This is fatal, and though Giacomo Ferro is doubtless more practically guilty in the matter than D'Enrico, yet D'Enrico is the responsible author of the work, and must bear the blame accordingly. Standing once with Signor Pizetta of Varallo, before D' Enrico's great Nailing of Christ to the Cross chapel, I asked him casually how he thought it compared with Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary. He replied " Questo non sacrifica niente,'' meaning that Tabachetti thought of the action much and but little of whether or no the actors got in each other's way, whereas D'Enrico was mainly bent on making his figures steer clear of one another. Thus his chapels want the concert and unity of action that give such life to Taba- chetti's. Nevertheless, in spite of the defect GIOVANNI D'ENRICO. 113 above referred to, it is impossible to deny that the sculptor of the Herod and Caiaphas figures was a man of very rare ability, nor can the general verdict which assigns him the third place among the workers on the Sacro Monte be reasonably disputed. But this third place must be given rather in respect of quantity than quality, for in dramatic power and highly- wrought tragic action he is inferior to the sculptor, whoever he may be, of the Massacre of the Innocents chapel, to which I will return when I come to the chapel in question. I may say in passing that Cicognara, Lubke, and Perkins have all omitted to mention Gio- vanni D'Enrico as a sculptor, though Nagler mentions his two brothers as painters. Nagler gives the two brothers D' Enrico as all bearing the patronymic Tanzio, which I am told is in reality only a corruption of the Christian name of the third brother. Zani mentions Giovanni D' Enrico as well as his two brothers, and calls him ** celebrCy' but he calls all the three brothers " Tanzii, Tanzi, Tanzio, or Tanzo/' H ( 114 ) CHAPTER IX. THE ASCENT, AND THE FIRST FOUR CHAPELS. The ascent to the Sacro Monte begins imme- diately after the church of Sta. Maria delle Grazie has been passed, and is made by a large broad road paved with rounded stones, and beautifully shaded by the chestnuts that grow on the steep side of the mountain. The old road up the mountain was below the present, and remains of it may yet be seen. Ere long a steeper narrower road branches off to the right hand, which makes rather a shorter cut, and is commonly called the '' Strada della Madonna^ From this name it has become generally believed that the Madonna once actually came to Varallo to see the Sacro Monte, and took this shorter road. There is no genuine tradition, however, to this effect, and the belief may be traced to misapprehension of a passage in Fassola and Torrotti, who say that the main road represents the path taken by Christ himself on his journey to Calvary, while the other symbolises the short ASCENT OF THE SACRO MONTE. 115 cut taken by the Virgin when she went to re- join him after his resurrection. When he was Assistentey which I gather to have been much what the Director of the Sacro Monte is now, Torrotti had some poetry put up to say this. At the point where the two roads again meet there is a large wooden cross, from which the faithful may help themselves to a chip. That they do get chips is evident by the state of the cross, but the wood is hard, and none but the very faithful will get so much but that plenty will be left for those who may come after them. I saw a stout elderly lady trying to get a chip last summer ; she was baffled, puzzled, frowned a good deal, and was perspiring .freely. She tried here, and she tried there, but could get no chip ; and presently began to cry. Jones and I had been watching her perplexity, as we came up the Strada della Madonna, and having a stouter knife than hers offered to help her. She was most grateful, when, not without difficulty, Jones succeeded in whittling for her a piece about an inch long, and as thick as the wood of a match box. '* Per Bacco,'' she exclaimed, still agitated, and not without asperity, '* I never saw such a cross in my life." The old cross, considered to be now past further whittling, was lying by the roadside ready to ii6 EX VOTO. be taken away. I had wanted to get the lady a chip from this, thinking it looked as if it would lend itself more easily to the design, but she said it would not do. They have a new cross every year, and they always select a hard knotty uncompromising piece of wood for the purpose. The old is then taken away and burnt for firewood. Of this cross Fassola says it was here {^' e gul fu dove'') the Virgin met her son, and that for this reason a small chapel was placed rather higher up, which represents the place where she took a little rest, and was hence called the Capella del Riposo. It was decorated with frescoes by Gaudenzio, which have long since disappeared ; these were early works, and among the first undertaken by him on the Sacro Monte ; the chapel remains, but may, and probably will, be passed without notice. A little higher still, there is another very small and unimportant chapel containing a decayed St. Jerome by Giovanni D'Enrico, and above this, facing the visitor at the last turn of the road, is the chapel erected in memory of Cesare Maio, or Maggi, a Neapolitan, Mar- quis of Moncrivelli, and one of Charles the Fifth's generals. He died in 1568. Many years before his death he had commanded an ASCENT OF THE SACRO MONTE. 117 armed force against the Valsesians, but when his horse, on approaching Varallo, caught sight of the Sacro Monte, it genuflected three times and pawed a great cross on the road with its feet. This had such an effect upon the rider that he had thenceforward to become a munificent benefactor of the Sacro Monte, and expressly desired to be buried there. I do not know where the horse was buried. His chapel contains nothing of importance, nor yet does the small oratory with a crucifix in memory of a benefactor, one Giovanni Pschel Alemanno ; this is at the top of the ascent and close to the smaller entrance to the Sacro Monte. At this smaller entrance the visitor will be inclined to enter, but he should not do so if he wishes to take the chapels in the order in which they are numbered. He should continue the broad road until he reaches the excellent inn kept by Signor Topini, and the shops where '' corone " and pilgrims' beads are sold. The inn and shops are mentioned by Fassola and by Torrotti. Fassola in 1671 says of the inn that it will afford accommodation for people of all ranks, and that though any one with other curiosity may stay in the town, those who would enjoy their devotion quietly and diffusively can ii8 EX VOTO. do so more at their ease here. Of the shops he says that they sell '' corone, Storie delta Fabrica^^ " and other like instruments of devo- tion '^ (** ed altri instromenti simili di divozione '' p. 80). Torrotti says they sell his book there, with images, and various devout curiosities {e varie cose curiose di divozione, p. 66). The shutters are strong and probably the original ones. At Varese there is a very beautiful lady, one among many others hardly if at all less beauti- ful on the same mountain, of Mrhom I once asked what people did with these Corone. She said, " Le adoperano per pregare^,' '' They make use of them to pray with." She then asked whether the English ever prayed. I said of course they did ; that all nations, even the Turks, prayed. " E Turco lei ? " she said, with a singularly sweet, kind, and beneficent expres- sion. I said I was not, but I do not think she believed me. Passing now under the handsome arch which forms the main entrance to the sacred precincts we come to Chapel No. i. Adam and Eve. This chapel is perhaps the only one in the case of which Pellegrino Tibaldi's design was ADAM AND EVE. 119 carried out ; and even here it has been in many respects modified. The figures are by Tabachetti ; and the original internal frescoes were by Domenico Alfani Perugino, but they have perished and have lately been replaced by some pieces from the life of Adam and Eve by Professor Burlazzi of Varallo. The outer frescoes are said by Bordiga to be by Giovanni Miel of Antwerp, but they are probably in reality by one of the brothers Battista and Gio. Mauro Rovere. I will, however, reserve remarks on this subject until I come to the Massacre of the Innocents chapel. The ori- ginal frescoes do not appear to have been exe- cuted till 1 5 94- 1 600, but the terra-cotta work is described as complete in the 1586 edition of Caccia in terms that leave no doubt but that the present group is intended ; it is probably among the first works executed by Tabachetti on the Sacro Monte, but how much earlier it is than 1586 cannot be known till the missing editions of Caccia are found. That he did the Adam and Eve is not doubted. If he also did the animals, he had made great progress by the time he came to the Temptation chapel, for the animals in this last chapel are far finer than those in the Adam and Eve chapel. The present chapel superseded an earlier 120 EX VOTO. one with the same subject, which was probably on the site now occupied by the Crowning with Thorns, inasmuch as in this chapel the fresco on one wall still represents Adam and Eve being dismissed from Paradise. Signor Arienta pointed this out to me, and I think it sufficiently determines the position of the original Adam and Eve chapel. The evidence for the exist- ence of the earlier chapel throws so much light upon the way in which figures have been shifted about and whole chapels have disappeared, leaving only an incidental trace or two behind them in some other of those now existing, that I shall not hesitate to reproduce it here. We were told in the town that there had been an old Adam and an old Eve, and that these two figures were now doing duty as Roman soldiers in chapel No. 23, which repre- sents the Capture of Christ. On investigation, we found, against the wall, two figures dressed as Roman soldiers that evidently had something wrong with them. The draperies of all the other figures are painted, either terra-cotta or wood, but with these two they are real, being painted linen or calico, dipped in thin mortar or plaster of Paris, and real drapery always means that the figure has had something done to it. The armour, where armour shows, is W^9^' Face p. 121. 'THE OLD ADAM AND EVE.' ADAM AND EVE. 121 not quite of the same pattern as that painted on the other figures, nor is it of the same make ; - in the case of the remoter figure it does not go down far enough, and leaves a lucid interval of what was evidently once bare stomach, but has now been painted the brightest blue that could be found, so that it does not catch the eye as flesh ; a little further examination was enough to make us strongly suspect that the figures had both been originally nude, and in this case the story current in Varallo was probably true. Then the question arose, which was Adam, and which Eve ? The farther figure was the larger and therefore ought to have been Adam, but it had long hair, and looked a good deal more like a woman than the other did. The nearer figure had a beard and moustaches, and was quite unlike a woman ; true, we could see no sign of bosom with the farther figure, but neither could we with the nearer. On the whole, therefore, we settled it that the nearer and moustached soldier was Adam, and the more distant long-haired beardless one. Eve. In the evening, however, Cav. Prof. Antonini and several of the other best Varallo authorities were on the Sacro Monte, and had the grating removed so that we could get inside the chapel, which we were not slow to do. The state of 122 EX VOTO. the drapery showed that curiosity had been already rife upon the subject, and, observing this, Jones and I gently lifted as much of it as was necessary, and put the matter for ever be- yond future power of question that the farther, long-haired, beardless figure was Adam, and the nearer, moustached one. Eve. They are now looking in the same direction, as joining in the hue and cry against Christ, but were originally turned towards one another ; the one offering, and the other taking, the apple. • Tabachetti's Eve, in the Creation or Adam and Eve chapel, is a figure of remarkable beauty, and a very great improvement on her predecessor. The left arm is a restoration by Cav. Prof. Antonini, but no one who was not told of the fact would suspect it. The heads both of the Adam and the Eve have been less successfully repainted than the rest of the figures, and have suffered somewhat in con- sequence, but the reader will note the free- dom from any approach to barocco maintained throughout the work. The serpent is exceed- ingly fine, and the animals are by no means unpleasing. Speaking for myself, I have found the work continually grow upon me during the many years I have known it. The walls of this, and, indeed, of all the Face p. 122. TABACHETTI'S "ADAM AND EVE." ADAM AND EVE. 123 chapels, were once covered with votive pictures recording the Grazie with which each several x:hapel should be credited, but these generally pleasing, though perhaps sometimes supersti- tious, minor satellites of the larger artistic luminaries have long since disappeared. It is plain that either the chapels are losing their powers of bringing the Grazie about, or that we moderns care less about saying "thank you'' when we have been helped out of a scrape than our forefathers did. Fassola says : — "Molti oltre questa non mancano di lasciar qualche insigne memoria, ciob b li dinari per inccminciar, b finire qualche Capella, b per qualche pittura b Statua, b altro non essendouene pur' vno di quest! Benefattori, che non habbino ottenute le grazie desiderate di Dio, e dalla Beata Vergine, del che piene ne sono le carte, le mura delle Capelle, e Chiese con voti d'argento, ed altre infinite Tauolette, antichissime, e moderne, voti di cera ed altro, oltre tanto da esprimersi grazie, che b per pouerta, b per mancanza, b per altri pensieri de' graziati restano celate." For my own part I am sorry that these humble chronicles of three centuries or so of hairbreadth escapes are gone. Votive pictures have always fascinated me. Everything does go so dread- fully wrong in them, and yet we know it will all be set so perfectly right again directly, and that nobody will be really hurt. Besides, they are so naive, and free from *'high-falutin ;" 124 EX VOTO. they give themselves no airs, are not review- puffed, and the people who paint them do not call one another geniuses. They are busi- ness-like, direct, and sensible ; not unfrequently they acquire considerable historical interest, and every now and then there is one by an old master born out of due time — who probably wist not so much as even that there were old masters. Here, if anywhere, may be found smouldering, but still living, embers of the old art-fire of Italy, and from these, more readily than from the hot-bed atmosphere of the academies, may the flame be yet rekindled. Lastly, if allowed to come as they like, and put themselves where they will, they grow into a pretty, quilt-like, artlessly-arranged decoration, that will beat any mere pattern contrived of set purpose. Some half-dozen or so of the old votive pictures are still preserved in the Museum at Varallo, and are worthy of notice, one or two of them dating from the fifteenth century, and a few late autumn leaves, as it were, of images in wax still hang outside the Crowning with Thorns chapel, but the chapels are, for the most part, now without them. Each chapel was supposed to be beneficial in the case of some particular bodily or mental affliction, and Fassola often winds up his notice THE ANNUNCIATION. 125 with a list of the Graces which are most especially to be hoped for from devotion at the -chapel he is describing; he does not, however, ascribe any especial and particular Grace to the first few chapels. A few ce?itesimi and perhaps a soldo or two still lie on the floor, thrown through the grating by pilgrims, and the number of these which any chapel can attract may be supposed to be a fair test of its popularity. These centesimi are a source of temptation to the small boys of Varallo, who are continually getting into trouble for extract- ing them by the help of willow wands and birdlime. I understand that when the centesimi are picked up by the authorities, some few are always left, on the same principle as that on which we leave a nest ^g^ in a hen's nest for the hen to lay a new one to ; a very little will do, but even the boys know that there must be a germ of increment left, and when they stole the coppers from the Ecce Homo chapel not long since, they still left one centesimo and a waistcoat button on the floor. Chapel No. 2. The Annunciation^ This was one of the earliest chapels, and is dated by Fassola as from 1490 to 1500. There IS no record of any contemporary fresco back- 126 EX VOTO. ground. Bordiga says that these figures were originally in the chapel now occupied by the Salutation of Mary by Elizabeth, but that having been long objects of popular veneration they were preserved at the time when Taba- chetti took this block of buildings in hand. It does not appear from any source what figures were in this chapel before the Annunciation figures were brought here; possibly, as it is supposed to be a reproduction of the Santa Casa di Loreto, this was considered enough and it was untenanted. Bordiga says, " The faces and extremities have a divine expression and are ancient," but both Fassola and Torrotti say that Tabachetti gave the figures new heads. These last are probably right ; the Virgin has real drapery, which, as I have said, always means that the figure has been cut about. Whatever the change was, it had been effected before the publication of the 1586 edition of Caccia, where the chapel is described, in immediate sequence to the Adam and Eve chapel, and in the following terms : — " Si vede poi un poco discosto, un altro Tempio, fatto ad imitatione della Cappella di Loreto, ben adornato, dove ^ TAngelo che annontia 1' incarnatione . . . . di relievo." In the poetical part of the same book the figures are very warmly praised, as, indeed, they THE ANNUNCIATION. 127 deserve to be. Fassola and Torrotti both say that the Virgin was a very favourite figure — so much so that pilgrims had loaded her with jewels. One night, a thief tried to draw a valuable ring from her finger, when she dealt him a stunning box on the ear that stretched him senseless until he was apprehended and punished. Fassola says of the affair : — " Frk gl' altri h degna di racconto la mortificazione hauuta da vn peruerso, che faUo ardito, non so da quale spirito diabolico, volendo rubbare alcune di dette gioie, e forsi tutte, dalle mani della Beata Vergine fu reso immobile da vna guanciata della Vergine fin' h tanto, che la giustizia 1' hebbe nella sua braccia ; contempli ogn' vno questa Statua, che ne riporterk mosso il cuore." Under the circumstances I should say he had better contemplate her at a respectful distance. I can believe that the thief was very much mortified, but the Virgin seems to have been a good deal mortified too, for I suspect her new head was after this occurrence and not before it. Such miracles are still of occasional if not frequent occurrence in connection with the Sacro Monte. I have a broadside printed at Milan in 1882 in which a full account is given of a recent miracle worked by the Blessed Virgin of the Sacro Monte of Varallo. It is 128 EX VOTO. about a young man who had been miraculously cured of a lingering illness that had baffled the skill of all the most eminent professors ; so his father sent him with a lamp of gold and a large sum of money which he was to offer to the Madonna. As he was on his way he felt tired [it must be remembered that the railway was not opened till 1886], so he sat down under a tree and began to amuse himself by counting the treasure. Hardly had he begun to count when he was attacked by four desperate assassins, who with pistols and poignards did their very utmost to despoil him, but it was not the smallest use. One of the assassins was killed, and the others were so cowed that they promised, if he would only fetch them some " devotions " from the Sacro Monte, to abandon their evil courses and thenceforth lead virtuous lives. We do not pitch our tracts quite so strongly, but need give ourselves no airs in this matter. Chapel No. 3. The Salutation of Mary BY Elizabeth. The walls of this chapel according to Fassola are old, but the figures all new. Both Fassola and Torrotti say that Tabachetti had just begun to work on this chapel when he lost his FIRST VISION OF ST. JOSEPH. 129 reason, but as the work is described as complete in the 1586 edition of Caccia, it is evident, as I have already shown, that his insanity was only temporary, inasmuch as he did another chapel after 1590. Both writers are very brief in their statement of the fact, Fassolaonly saying ''quando era diuenuto pazzo^' diXi^ Torrotti '^ impazzitosiy The fresco background is meagre and forms no integral part of the design ; this does not go for much, but suggests that in the original state of the chapel, which we know was an early one, there may have been but little back- ground, the fresco background not having yet attained its full development. The figures would doubtless look better than they do if they had not been loaded with many coats of shiny paint, which has clogged some of the modelling ; they are not very remarkable, but improve upon examination, and it must be remembered that the subject is one of exceed- ing difficulty. Chapel No. 4. First Vision of St. Joseph. Fassola and Torrotti say that this chapel was originally a servant's lodge ('' ospizio delli serui della Fabrica "), and part of the building is still used as a store-room. The servants were subsequently shifted to what was then the 130 EX VOTO. chapel of the Capture of Christ, the figures in that chapel being moved to the one in which they are now. The original Capture chapel was on the ground floor of the large house that stands on the right hand as one enters the small entrance to the Sacro Monte which a visitor will be tempted to take, opposite Gio- vanni PscheFs chapel, and a little below the Temptation chapel. The First Vision of St. Joseph is not men- tioned in either the 1586 or 1590 editions of Caccia; we may therefore be certain that it did not exist, and may also be sure that it was Tabachetti's last work upon the Sacro Monte — for that it is by him has never been disputed. It should probably be dated early in 1591, by which time Tabachetti must have recovered his reason and was on the point of leaving Varallo for ever. I give a photograph of the very beautiful figure of St. Joseph, which must rank among the finest on the Sacro Monte. I grant that a sleeping figure is the easiest of all subjects, except a dead one, inasmuch as Nature does not here play against the artist with loaded dice, by being able to give the immediate change of position which the artist cannot. With sleep and death there is no change re- quired, so that the hardest sleeping figure is Face p. Tja. 'FIRST VISION OF ST. JOSEPH." By Tabachetti. FIRST VISION OF ST. JOSEPH. 131 easier than the easiest waking one ; moreover, sleep is so touching and beautiful that it is one -of the most taking of all subjects ; nevertheless there are sleeping figures and sleeping figures, and the St. Joseph in the chapel we are consi- dering is greatly better than the second sleeping St. Joseph in chapel No. g, by whomsoever this figure may be — or than the sleeping Apostles by D'Enrico in chapel No. 22. Cusa says that the Madonna is taken from a small figure modelled by Gaudenzio still existing at Valduggia in the possession of the Rivaroli family. She is a very pretty and graceful figure, and is sewing on a pillow in the middle of the composition — of course un- moved by the presence of the angel, who is only visible to her husband. The angel is also a remarkably fine figure. ( 132 ) CHAPTER X. THE SEVEN CHAPELS NUMBERED 5-11. Chapel No. 5. Visit of the Magi. Fassola says that this chapel was begun about the year 1500, and completed about 1520, at the expense of certain wealthy Milanese ; Torrotti repeats this. Bordiga gives it a later date, making Gaudenzio begin to work in it in 1531 ; he supposes that Gaudenzio left Varallo sud- denly in that year to undertake work for the church of St. Cristoforo at Vercelli without quite completing the Magi frescoes ; and it is indeed true that the frescoes appear to be unfinished, some parts at first sight seeming only sketched in outline, as though the work had been interrupted ; but Colombo, whose in- dustry is only equalled by his fine instinct and good sense, refers both the frescoes and their interruption to a later date. Still, Fassola may have only intended, and indeed probably did intend, that the shell of the building was com- pleted by 1520, the figures and frescoes being VISIT OF THE MAGI. 133 deferred for want of funds, though the building was ready for occupation. Colombo, on page 1 1 5 of his " Life and Work of Gaudenzio Ferrari," says that Bordiga re- marked the obvious difference in style between the frescoes in the Magi and the Crucifixion chapels, which he held to have been completed in 1524, but nevertheless thought seven years the utmost that passed between the two works. Colombo shows that by 1528 Gaudenzio was already established at Vercelli, and ascribes the frescoes in the Magi chapel to a date some time between 1536 and 1539, during which time he believes that Gaudenzio returned to Varallo, finding no trace of him elsewhere. The internal evidence in support of this opinion is strong, for the Crucifixion chapel is not a greater advance upon the frescoes in the church of St. Maria delle Grazie, painted in 1 5 13, magnificent as these last are, than the Magi frescoes are upon the Crucifixion, and an interval of ten years or so is not too much to allow between the two. Gaudenzio Ferrari was like Giovanni Bellini, a slow but steady grower from first to last ; with no two painters can we be more sure that as long as they lived they were taking pains, and going on from good to better ; nevertheless, it takes 134 EX VOTO, many years before so wide a difference can be brought about, as that between the frescoes in the Magi and Crucifixion chapels. The Magi frescoes have, however, unfortunately suffered from damp much more than the Crucifixion ones, and I should say they had been a good deal retouched, but by a very capable artist. Colombo thinks that in these frescoes Gau- denzio was assisted by his son Gerolamo, who died in 1539, and, as I have said, holds that it was the death of this son which made him leave Varallo, without even finishing the frescoes on which he was engaged. But Signor Arienta assures me that the frescoes were not in reality left incomplete : he holds that the wall on the parts where the out- line shows was too dry when the colour was laid on, and that it has gradually gone, leaving the outline only. This, he tells me, not unfre- quently happens, and has occurred in one or two places even in the Crucifixion chapel, where an arm here and there appears unfinished. The parts in the Magi chapel that show the outline only are not likely to have been left to the last ; they come in a very random haphazard way, and I have little hesitation in accepting Signor Arienta's opinion. If, however, this is wrong and the work was really unfinished, I VISIT OF THE MAGI. 135 should ascribe this fact to the violent dissen- sions that broke out ifi 1538, and should incline towards using it as an argument for assigning this date to the frescoes themselves, more especially as it fits in with whatever other meagre evidence we have. Something went wrong with the funds destined for the erection of this chapel, and this may account for the length of time taken to erect the chapel itself, as well as for subse- quent delay in painting it and filling it with statues. In the earlier half of his work Fassola says that certain Milanese gentlemen, " Signori della Castellanza^' subscribed two hundred gold scudi with which to found the chapel, but that the money was in part diverted to other uses — '* a matter,'' he says, *^ about which I am compelled to silence by a passage in my preface ; '' this passage is the expression of a desire to avoid giving offence; but Fassola says the interception of the funds involved the chapel's "remaining incomplete for some time." There seems, in fact, to have been some serious scandal in connection with the money, about which, even after 150 years, Fassola was un- willing to speak. I would ask the reader to note in passing that in this work, high up on the spectator's 136 EX VOTO. right, Gaudenzio has painted some rocks with a truth which was in his time rare. In the earliest painting, rocks seem to have been considered hopeless, and were represented by a something like a mould for a jelly or blanc- mange ; yet rocks on a grey day are steady sitters, and one would have thought the early masters would have found them among the first things that they could do, whereas on the contrary they were about the last to be rendered with truth and freedom by the greatest painters. This was probably because rocks bored them ; they thought they could do them at any time, and were more interested with the figures, draperies, and action. Leonardo da Vinci's rocks, for example, are of no use to any one, nor yet for the matter of that is any part of his landscape — what little there is of it. Holbein's strong hand falls nerveless before a rock or mountain side, and even Marco Basaiti, whose landscape has hardly been surpassed by Giovanni Bellini himself, could not treat a rock as he treated other natural objects. As for Giovanni Bellini, I do not at this moment re- member to have seen him ever attempt a bit of slate, or hard grey gritty sandstone rock. This is not so with Gaudenzio, his rocks in the Magi chapel, and again in the Pieta compart- VISIT OF THE MAGL 137 ment of his fresco in the church of St. Maria delle Grazie, at the foot of the mountain, are as good as rocks need ever be. The earliest really good rocks I know are in the small en- tombment by Roger Van der Weyden in our own National Gallery. Returning to the terra-cotta figures in the Magi chapel, there is nothing about them to find fault with, but they do not arouse the same enthusiasm as the frescoes. They too are sufferers by damp and lapse of time, and a painted terra-cotta figure does not lend itself to a dignified decay. The disjecti membra poetce are hard to recognise if painted terra-cotta is the medium through which inspiration has been communicated to the outer world. Outside the Magi chapel, invisible by the Magi, and under a small glazed lantern which lights the St. Joseph with the Virgin adoring the Infant Saviour, and the Presepio, hangs the star. It is very pretty where it is, but its absence from the chapel itself is, I think, on the whole, regrettable. I have been sometimes tempted to think that it originally hung on the wall by a hook which still .remains near the door through which the figures must pass, but think it more probable that this hook was used to fasten the string of a curtain that was hung over the window. 138 EX VOTO. In conclusion, I should say that Colombo says that the figures being short of the prescribed number were completed by Fermo Stella. Bor- diga gives the horses only to this artist. Chapel No. 6. Il Presepio. This is more a grotto than a chapel, and is declared in an inscription set up by Bernardino Caimi in letters of gold to be '' the exact counterpart of the one at Bethlehem in which the Virgin gave birth to her Divine Son.'* Bordiga writes of this inscription as still visible, but I have repeatedly looked for it without success. If Caimi, as Fassola distinctly says, had the above inscription set up, it is plain that this, and perhaps the Shepherd's chapel hard by, were among the very earliest chapels under- taken. This is rendered probable by the state- ment of Fassola that the shell of the Circum- cision chapel which adjoins the ones we are now considering was built ^' dalli principij del Sacro Montey He says that this fact is known by the testimony of certain contemporaneous painters {^' il che s argumenta dalli Pittord che furono dique' tempi'). Clearly, then, the Pre- sepio, Shepherds, and Circumcision chapels were in existence some years before the Magi IL PRESEPIO. 139 chapel was begun. Gaudenzio was too young to have done the figures before Bernardino -died. Originally, doubtless, the grotto was shown without figures, which were added by Gaudenzio, later on ; they were probably among his first works. The place is so dark that they cannot be well seen, but about noon the sun comes down a narrow staircase and they can be made out very well for a quarter of an hour or so ; they are then seen to be very good. They have no fresco background, nor yet is there any to the Shepherd's chapel, which con- firms me in thinking these to have been among the earliest works undertaken. Colombo says that the infant Christ in the Presepio is not by Gaudenzio, the original figure having been stolen by some foreigner not many years ago, and Battista, the excellent Custode of the Sacro Monte, assures me that this was the second time the infant had been stolen. Chapel No. 7. Visit of the Shepherds. Some of the figures — the Virgin, one shep- herd, and four little angels — in this chapel are believed to be by Gaudenzio, and if they are, they are probably among his first essays, but they are lighted from above, and the spectator looks down on them, so that the dust shows, I40 EX VOTO. and they can hardly be fairly judged. The hindmost shepherd — the one with his hand to his heart and looking up, is the finest figure ; the Virgin herself is also very good, but she wants washing. If Fassola and Torrotti are to be believed,^ and I am afraid I must own that, much as I like them, I find them a little credulous, the Virgin in this chapel is more remarkable than she appears at first sight ; she used originally to have her face turned in admiration towards the infant Christ, but at the very first moment that she heard the bells begin to ring for the eleva- tion of Pope Innocent the Tenth to the pope- dom, she turned round to the pilgrims visiting the place, in token of approbation ; the autho- rities, not knowing what to make of such behaviour, had her set right, but she turned round a second time with a most gracious smile and assumed the position which the elevation * Their words run thus ; — " II volto di quella Vergine Maria mirava altre volte al Bambino Giesu, mh dalP anno, il giorno, ed hora, che fu creato Pontefice Innocenzo X. al suono di Cam- pane miracolosamente si volto alii Visitanti. Dicono alcuni, che prima ancora staua riuoltata al Popolo, e che accommodata, non accorgendosi del miracolo in detto giorno, poi lo diede a conoscere." Fassola, p. 86. *' Si dice che la Vergine mirava il Bambino, e quando si sonarono le campane per I'esaltazione d'Innocenzio X. torn6 il volto ai Visitanti, che racconciata nuovamente voltollo al popolo come invitante.'' Torrotti, p. 70. THE CIRCUMCISION. 141 of no later Pope has been ever able to disturb. Pope Innocent X. was not exactly the kind of Pope whom one would have expected the Virgin to greet with such extraordinary con- descension. If it had been the present amiable and venerable Pontiff there would have been less to wonder at. Chapel No. 8. Called by Fassola and TORROTTI THE CiRCUMCISION, AND BY BoR- DiGA THE Purification. The chapel itself is, as I have already said, one of the very oldest on the Sacro Monte ; it is doubtless much older than either the frescoes or the terra-cotta figures which it contains, both of which are given by Fassola, Torrotti, and Bordiga to Fermo Stella, but I cannot think they are right in either case. The frescoes remind me more of Lanini, and are much too modern for Fermo Stella ; they are, however, in but poor preservation, and no very definite opinion can be formed concerning them. The terra-cotta work is, I think, also too free for Fermo Stella. The infant Jesus is very pretty, and the Virgin would also be a fine figure if she was not spoiled by the wig and over-much paint which restorers have doubtless got to answer for. The work is mentioned in the 142 EX VOTO. 1586 edition of Caccia as completed, but there IS nothing to show whether or no it was a restoration. I have long thought I detected a certain sub-Flemish feeling in both the Virgin and Child, and though aware that I have very- little grounds for doing so, am half inclined to think that Tabachetti must have had some- thing to do with them. Bordiga is clearly wrong in calling the chapel a Purification. There are no doves, and there must always be doves for a Purification. Besides, there was till lately a knife ready for use lying on the table, as shown in Guidetti's illustration of the chapel. Chapel No. 9. Joseph Warned to Fly. This chapel is described as completed in both the 1586 and 1590 editions of Caccia. The figures are again given to Fermo Stella by Bordiga, but not by either Fassola or Torrotti. I am again unable to think that Bordiga is right. There is again, also, a sub- Flemish feeling which is difficult to account for. The angel is a fine figure, and the heads of the Virgin and Child are also excellent, but the folds of the drapery are not so good. If there were any evidence, which there is not, to show that these figures were early works of THE FLIGHT INTO EGYPT. 143 Tabachetti, and that the sleeping St. Joseph is a first attempt at the figure which he suc- ceeded later so admirably in rendering, I should be inclined to accept it ; as it is, I can form no opinion about the authorship of the terra-cotta work. The fresco background is worthless. Chapel No. 10. The Flight into Egypt. This chapel is of no great interest. The authors and the date are uncertain. It is men- tioned in the 1586 and 1590 editions of Caccia, but we may be tolerably sure that Tabachetti had nothing to do with it. Bordiga says **the figures seem to be by Stella," which may be right or may be wrong. Though the figures are not very good, yet this chapel has, or had in Fassola s time, other merits perhaps even of greater than artistic value, for he says it is particularly useful to those who have lost any- thing. ^'Perditori di qualche cosa'^ are more especial recipients of grace in consequence of devotion at this particular chapel. The flight is conducted as leisurely as flights into Egypt invariably are, but has with it a something, I know not what — perhaps it is the donkey — which always reminds me of Hampstead Heath on a bank holiday. 144 EX VOTO. Chapel No. ii. Massacre of the Innocents. This is one of the most remarkable chapels on the Sacro Monte, and also one of the most abounding in difficult problems. It was built with funds provided by Carlo Emanuele I., Duke of Savoy, about the year 1586, and took four years to complete. In the 1586-7 edition of Caccia the chapel itself is alone given as completed. In the 1 590-1 edition, it is said that both the sculptures and the frescoes were now finished, and that they are all ^' bellissime e benfatti {sic)^ This is confirmed by an in- scription on the collar of a soldier who stands near Herod's right hand, and which, I do not doubt, is intended to govern the whole of the terra-cotta work. The inscription runs — •^Michel Ang. RSTI" (Rossetti) "Scul: Da Claino MDXC Etatean. viil" This exactly tallies with the dates given in the two editions of Caccia. The date is thus satisfactorily established, but the authorship of the work is less easily settled. All the authorities without exception say that the sculptor was a certain Giacomo Bargnola of Valsolda, who was also called MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 145 Bologna. Fassola describes him as a *' stahiario virtuosissimo e glorioso per tutta /' Eur op a^' and Torrotti calls him '' il famoso Giacomo Bargnola di Valsoldo [sic] sopranominato Bo- logna!' All subsequent writers have repeated this. At Varallo itself I found nothing known about either Bargnola or Valsolda, but turning to Zani find Bargnola under the name Paracca. Zani says, ** Paracca^ non Peracca^ ne Perracca^ ne Perrazza, Giannantonio, Giacomo^ detto il Valsoldo, Valsolino, e il Valsoldino, non Val- fondino, ed anche il Bargnola^ e malamente Antonio Valsado Parravalda!' He says that he was a '^ plastico'' and restorer of statues, came from the neighbourhood of Como, was '' bravissimoy' and lived about from 1 557-1 587. There was a Luigi Paracca from the same place who was also called *' II Valsoldino," and a Giacomo, and an Andrea, but of these last three he does. not say that they were note- worthy. Nagler mentions only a Giovanni Antonio Parracca, who he says was called Valsolda. He says that he was a sculptor of Milan, who made a reputation at Rome about 1580 as a restorer of antique statues ; that he only worked in order to get money to spend on debauchery, K 146 EX VOTO. and died, according to Baglione, young, and in a hospital. His words are — " Paracca, Gio. Antonio gennant Valsoldo, Bildhauer von Mailand, machte sich um 1580 in Rom als Restaurator antiker Werke einen Namen, arbeitete aber nur, um Geld zur Schwelgerei zu bekommen. Starb jung im Hospital wie Baglione versichert." I have had Baglione before me, but can find no life of Paracca either under that name or under that of Bargnola, and suppose the refer- ence to him must be incidental in the life of some other artist. I will again gratefully accept a fuller reference. I do not believe a word about Paracca's alleged debauchery. Who ever yet worked as Nagler says ? We have, then, to face on the one hand the authority of all writers about the Sacro Monte, and on the other, the exceedingly explicit claim made by Rossetti himself in the inscription given above. Probably Bargnola began the work and Rossetti finished it. It is not likely that the extremely circumstantial statement of Fassola should be without any foundation, but again it is not likely that Rossetti would have claimed the work if he had not done at any rate the greater part of it. If Bargnola died about 1587, he could not have done much, for in the 1 586-1 587 edition of Caccia it is ex- MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 147 pressly stated that the chapel alone was done ^' Di questa e fatta solamente la chiesa'' And if he had lived to finish the work, he, and not Rossetti, would have signed it. We may con- clude, then, with some certainty, that he died before the chapel was finished, but may think it nevertheless probable that he was originally commissioned to do it. The question resolves itself, therefore, into how much he did, and how soon Rossetti took the work over. It must be remembered that Michael Angelo Rossetti is a name absolutely unknown to us. Zani, Nagler, Cicognara, Llibke, Perkins, and all the authorities I have consulted omit to mention him. I find abun- dant reference to three, and indeed five, painters who were called Rossetti, two of whom — doubt- less nephews of Michael Angelo Rossetti, — did the frescoes in this very chapel we are considering, but no one says one syllable about any Michael Angelo Rossetti, and it is a bold thing to suppose that an unknown man should have succeeded so admirably with such a very important work as the Massacre of the Innocents chapel, and have lived as the inscription shows to the age at least of fifty-seven without leaving a single trace in any other quarter whatever. The work, at any rate in many parts, is that of 148 EX VOTO. one who has been working in clay all his life, and was a thorough master of his craft, and this makes it all the more difficult to suppose it to be a single iour de force. On the other hand, such tours de force were not uncommon among medieval Italian workmen. Gaudenzio Ferrari's work in sculpture is little else than a succession of tours de force^ and in other parts of the work we are now considering, there is a certain archaism which suggests growing rather than matured power. We should not forget, however, that an inscription in terra-cotta cannot be surrepti- tiously scrawled on like a false signature on a fresco or painting. Here the signature was made with pomp and circumstance while the clay was still wet, and was baked with the figure on which it appears. Too many people in this case would have to know about it for a false inscription to be probable. As for the evidence of Fassola, we must bear in mind that he is a notoriously inaccurate writer; that he did not write till nearly a hundred years after the work was completed ; that Torrotti is only an echo of Fassola, and all subsequent writers little more than echoes of Fassola and Torrotti. On the whole, therefore, the more I have considered the matter the more I incline towards accepting MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 149 the signature, and giving the greater part of the terra-cotta work to the man who claims it — that is to say, to Michael Angelo Rossetti, sculptor, of Claino. Signor Arienta tells me he has found a Castel Claino mentioned in an old document, as formerly existing near Milan. He is himself inclined (though know- ing nothing of Paracca when I last saw him), to see two hands in the work — and here he is probably right, but I hardly think Rossetti would have signed as he did if Bargnola or Paracca had done the greater part or even half of it. Proceeding to a consideration of the frescoes, we find that two of Herod's body-guard, stand- ing on his left hand, and corresponding to the one on his right, on whose collar the sculptor signed his name, have also signatures on their collars, obviously done in concert with the sculptor. The signatures are as follows : — " Battista Rover i Pictor Milane -^ta xxxv " and ** lo Mauro Rover Pictor." Fassola says that the painter of the chapel was "il Fiamenghino." If he had said the painters were ''i Fiamenghini" he would have been right, for Signor Arienta called my atten- tion to a passage in Lanzi, in which he has ISO EX VOTO. dealt with three painters bearing the name of Rovere, two of whom, if not all three, were called '' I Fiamenghini." The three were Gio- vanni Mauro, Giambattista, and Marco, which last painter does not seem to have had any- thing to do with the Massacre of the Innocents. Lanzi calls Gio. Mauro a follower, first of Camillo, and then of Giulio Cesare Procaccini. He describes them as painters of great facility and invention, but as seldom taking pains to do what they very well might have done, if they had chosen, and his verdict is, I should say, about right. He adds : — " I find them also called Rossetti, and they are still more often described as * / Fiamenghini,^ their father, Richard, having come from Flanders, and settled in Milan." Signor Arienta explained to me that it was through this surname of Fiamenghini, by which the brothers Rovere were known, that Giovanni Miel D'Anvers was supposed to have had any hand in the frescoes on the Sacro Monte. This last-named painter was court painter to Carlo Emanuelle I. Bordiga knew this, and seeing he came from Antwerp, concluded that he must be **il Fiamenghino" mentioned, and all subsequent writers have followed him. Signor Arienta also tells me that some twenty MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 151 years or so later these same two painters signed some frescoes at Orta as follows : — " lo Battista, et lo Maurus Aruberius, dicti Fiamenghini, pinxerunt anno 1608 die 9 Octobris.'* Doubtless their mother's name was Rossetti, and the Michael Angelo RSTI who claims the sculptured work, and was some twenty years their senior, was their uncle. He also told me that one of the figures in the frescoes of the Massacre of the Innocents chapel is wearing a collar with a clasp on which there is an oak-tree, for which '' Rovere " is the Italian, and that he holds this to have been a portrait of the painter. Fassola says that under the glazed aperture which is in front of the piece there is placed a small terra-cotta car drawn by a child and loaded with a head, or ear, of maize, a goose, and a clown ; he explains that the maize means I GOO, the car 400, the clown 90, and the goose ''per il suo verso " — whatever this may mean — 4, which numbers taken together make the number of infants that were killed. He adds that there is another like hieroglyphic, which, as it is not very important, he will pass over. I find no mention of this in Torrotti, nor yet in Bordiga, but when people call attention to a 152 EX VOTO. thing and then say nothing about it, I generally find they have a reason. On a recent visit to Varallo I examined the two hieroglyphs ; the second is also a small terra-cotta car or cart drawn by a child, and containing the bust of a monk, a die, and two or three other things that I could not make out. The treatment of these two hieroglyphics alone is enough to show that they were done by a thorough master of his craft. No doubt the import of the whole was known by Fassola to be sinister, but I must leave its interpretation to others. He adds that the graces vouchsafed at this chapel are chiefly on behalf of sick children. I may conclude by saying that though nothing has been taken directly from Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary chapel, the sculptor, who- ever he was, has nevertheless plainly felt the influence, and been animated by the spirit of that great work, then just completed. ( ^53 ) CHAPTER XL CHAPELS No. 12— No. 22. We now begin the series of chapels that deal with Christ's Manhood, Ministry, and Passion. The first of these is Chapel No. 12. The Baptism of Christ BY John. The statues are of no great interest, and of unknown authorship. The frescoes are by Orazio Gallinone di Treviglio, but they are not striking. The date of the chapel is about 1585. It is mentioned in the 1586 edition of Caccia, and it is added that the water of the fountain would be brought there shortly so as to imitate the Jordan. This was done, but the water made the chapel so damp that it was turned off again. The graces, according to Fassola, are chiefly for married ladies. 154 EX VOTO. Chapel No. 13. Temptation. This chapel is given as completed in the 1586 edition of Caccia, and had probably been by this time reconstructed by Tabachetti, to whom the work is universally and no doubt justly ascribed. That the figures of Christ and of the devil have both been cut about may be conjectured from their draperies being in part real linen or calico, and not terra-cotta ; Christ's red shirt front is real, as also is a great part of the devil's dress. This last personage is a most respectable-looking patriarchal old Jewish Rabbi. I should say he was the leading solicitor in some such town as Samaria, and that he gave an annual tea to the choir. He is offering Christ some stones just as any other respectable person might do, and if it were not for his formidable two clawed feet there would be nothing to betray his real nature. The beasts with their young are excellent. The porcupine has real quills. The fresco background is by Melchior D'Enrico, and here the fall of the devil when the whole is over is treated with a realistic unreserve little likely to be repeated. He is dreadfully unwell. The graces in this WOMAN OF SAMARIA. 155 chapel are more especially for those tempted by the world, the flesh, and the devil, for people who are bewitched, and for those who are in any wise troubled in mind, body, and estate, **as the varying views of the pilgrims them- selves will best determine." Bordiga says that the chapel was begun about 1580, and completed in 1594, but he refers probably to Tabachetti's reconstruction, for in the portico there is an inscription painted by order of the Bishop, and forbidding visitors to deface the walls, that is dated 1524, and the back of the chapel has many early i6th century scratches. Chapel No. 14. The Woman of Samaria. This chapel is given as completed in the 1586 edition of Caccia, so that Bordiga and Cusa are wrong in dating it 1598. In the poetical part of Caccia it is described as recently made and *' den ritratto!' The woman of Samaria is a fine buxom figure, but the paint has peeled off so badly both from her and from the Christ that it is hardly fair to judge the work at all. I should think it was very pos- sibly an early work by Tabachetti, but should be sorry to hazard a decided opinion. The 156 EX VOTO. frescoes are without interest. The graces at this chapel were chiefly for women who wanted to abandon some evil practice, and for rain when the country was suffering from long drought. This last is because Christ said to the woman of Samaria " Give me to drink.'^ Chapel No. 15. The Paralytic. The chapel alone was completed by 1586 and 1590, so that we may be certain Taba- chetti had no hand in it. The statues are said to be by D'Enrico, whom we meet here for the first time. Bordiga praises them very highly, but neither Jones nor I liked the composition as much as we should have wished to have done. Some of the individual figures are good, especially a man with his arm in a sling, and two men conversing on the left of the com- position, but there is too little concerted and united action, and too much attempt to show off every figure to the best advantage, to the sacrifice of more important considerations. They probably date from 1620-1624, in which last year Bordiga says that the frescoes were completed. These are chiefly, if not entirely, by Cristoforo Martinolo, a Valsesian artist and pupil of Morazzone, who, according to Bordiga, WIDOW'S SON AT NAIN. 157 though little known, has here shown himself no common artist. Again neither Jones nor I admired them as much as we should have been glad to do. ''All infirmities of fever, and paralysis/' says Fassola, ''if recommended to the Great Saviour at this place will be dis- sipated, as may be gathered from the many wit here exhibited." Chapel No. 16. The Widow's Son at Nain. Of this chapel the walls are alone mentioned as completed in 1590. So that Bordiga and Cusa are again wrong in saying that the frescoes were painted about 1580. It is not good. The walls were probably raised soon after 1580. Donna Mathilde di Savoia, Mar- chesa di Pianezza, a natural daughter of Carlo Emmanuele I., was among the principal con- tributors. The graces were " for those who had had bad falls or any accidents whereby they had been rendered speechless, stupid, senseless, and apparently dead." It will be observed on referring to the plan facing p. 68, that this chapel is given as on the ground now occupied by Christ taken before Annas, and faces the Herod chapel on the 158 EX VOTO. Piazza dei Tribunali. This may be a mere error in the plan, but the plan is generally accurate, and it is very likely that a change was made in the middle of the last century when the Annas chapel was built. Chapel No. 17. The Transfiguration. This is on the highest ground of the Sacro Monte, the Transfiguration being supposed to have happened on Mount Sinai. Inside the chapel they have made Mount Sinai, but Fassola says that it was originally quite too high, and the Fabbricieri had ordered it to be made lower, '* so as to render it more enjoyable by the eye.'' It was begun at the end of the sixteenth century, but is mentioned as being only ''founded" in the 1586 and 1590 editions of Caccia, and the work seems to have got little further than the foundations, until in 1660 it was resumed; Fassola, writing in 1671, says that the chapel was '' levata in alto da terra fanno del milley set cento e sessanta,'' or about ten years before his book appeared ; it was still in great part unpainted, and he makes an appeal to his readers to contribute towards its completion. From both Fassola and Torrotti it would appear that only the group of figures TRA NSFIG URA TION. 159 on the mountain was in existence when they wrote. They both of them make the extra- .ordinary statement that these figures are by Giovanni D'Enrico, whom they must have perfectly well known to have been dead more than a quarter of a century before Fassola wrote, and many years before the figures could possibly have been placed where they now are. It is much as though I, writing now, were to ascribe Boehm's statue of Mr. Darwin, in the Natural History Museum at South Kensington, to Chantrey. The figures on the mountain are among the worst on the Sacro Monte. I see that Cusa ascribes the figures of Peter, James, and John only to D'Enrico, but the ascription is very difficult to understand. Bordiga does not say who did the figures of Peter, James, and John, but he gives the Christ, Moses, and Elias to Pietro Francesco Petera of Varallo. The fourteen figures at the foot of the mountain he assigns to Gaudenzio Soldo of Camasco, a pupil of the sculptor Dionigi Bussola. In 1665 Giuseppe and Stefano Danedi, called Montalti, and pupils of Morazzone, ** painted the cupola of the chapel with innumerable angels great and small exhibiting the most varied movements." Giuseppe had the greater share in this work, in which may be seen, i6o EX VOTO. according to Bordiga, signs of the influence of Guido, under whom Giuseppe had studied. Among the figures below the mountain there is a bhnd man, and a boy with a bad foot leading him — both good — and a contemptuous father telling the Apostles that they cannot cure his son, and that he had told them so from the first, but the paint is peeling off the figures so much that the work can hardly be judged fairly. When photographed they look much better, and Signor Pizetta tells me he was last year commissioned to photograph the boy, who is in a fit of hystero-epilepsy, for a medical work that was being published in France, so it is probably very true to nature. Chapel No. i8. Raising of Lazarus. Fassola says that this chapel was erected at the expense of Pomponio Bosso, a noble Milanese, between the years 1560 and 1580. It is mentioned as finished in the 1586 edition of Caccia, and was probably completed before Tabachetti came. Bordiga only says that it was finished in 1582. The statues are of little or no merit, nor yet the frescoes. I observe that in Caccia the " tempio '' is praised but not apparently the work that it contained. The ENTRY INTO JERUSALEM. i6i terra-cotta figures are ascribed by Bordiga to Ravello, and the frescoes to Testa, whose ..brother, Lorenzo Testa, was Fabbriciere at the time the chapel was erected. There is one rather nice little man in the left-hand corner, but there is nothing else. Chapel No. 19. Entry into Jerusalem. The figures in this chapel are ascribed to Giovanni D'Enrico by both Fassola and Torrotti, an ascription very properly set aside by Bordiga, without assigned reason, but probably because 1590 is considerably too early for Giovanni D' Enrico, and there is a document dated May 235 1590, showing that the fresco background was then contracted for. The sculptured figures are mentioned as finished in the 1586 edition of Caccia, so that D'Enrico could not have done them. They are better than those in the preceding chapels, but they do not arouse enthusiasm, and have suffered so much from decay, and from repainting, that it is hardly fair to form any opinion about them. They probably looked much better when new. The landscape part of the background is by one of the brothers Rovere, named, as I have said, Fiamenghini, and he has introduced a house i62 EX VOTO. with a stepped gable like those at Antwerp. Some of the figures in the background appear to be by the painter Testa, who is named in the document above referred to. Chapel No 20. The Last Supper. This was one of the earliest chapels, and is mentioned as completed in the 1586 edition of Caccia. The figures are of wood, stiff, and lifeless, the supper is profuse and of much later date than the figures, but the whole scene is among the least successful on the Sacro Monte. Originally, but not till many years after the figures had been made and placed, Lanini painted a fresco background for this chapel. Perhaps Gaudenzio brought him from Vercelli on the occasion of the temporary return to Varallo supposed by Colombo to have taken place between 1536 and 1539. If we could know when Lanini was on the Sacro Monte doing this background, we might suspect that Gaudenzio was not far off. Lanini's work has unfortunately perished in a second reconstruc- tion of the chapel. Torrotti in 1686 says that a reconstruction of the Cena chapel was then contemplated, but that Lanini's frescoes were not to be touched. The original Cena chapel AGONY IN THE GARDEN, 163 may or may not have been on its present site, but the first restoration certainly was so, as .appears from the plan dated 1671 already given. The apostles have real napkins round their shoulders. The graces are for people who feel themselves deficient in faith, and interces- sion may be made here for obstinate sinners. Chapel No. 21. The Agony in the Garden. This chapel, again, has been reconstructed, but the old figures have not been preserved as in the case of the Cena, nor yet has the original site. The original site, according to Bordiga, was apart from the other chapels at the foot of the neighbouring monticello, mean- ing, presumably, the height on which the Trans- figuration chapel now stands. It was at this old chapel that S. Carlo used to spend hours in prayer. It was one of the earliest, and the figures were of wood. Fassola says that it was the angel who was offering the cup to Christ in the old chapel who announced his approaching end to S. Carlo, but the figures had been removed in his time as they were perishing, and the terra-cotta ones by Giovanni D'Enrico had been substituted, with a fresco 1 64 EX VOTO, background by his brother Melchiorre. These in their turn perished during a reconstruction some twenty years or so ago. The graces at this chapel are thus described by Fassola. " II moderno e Christo ed Angiolo nel medemo stato rinouati non sono meno miraculosi, perche tutti li con- correnti, bisognosi di pazienza di soffrire trauagli, malattie, ed ogni sorte d' infermita tanto dell' anima, quanto del corpo caldamente racomandandosi al piacere di questo sudante Christo riportano cio che meglio per lo stato di questo, ed altro Mondo fk di necessita alle loro persone." I find no mention of any original fresco background, though I do of the one added afterwards by Melchiorre D' Enrico, now no longer in existence. As this was one of the earliest chapels, I incline to think that there was no fresco background in the first instance. Chapel No. 22, The Sleeping Apostles. Fassola says that this chapel was decorated about fifty years (really fifty-nine) before the date at which he was writing, by Melchiorre D'Enrico. It was then on its present site, but the end of the Cena block was rebuilt some twenty years ago. The present Custode, Battista, tells me he worked at the rebuilding, and taking me upstairs showed me a trace or THE SLEEPING APOSTLES. 165 two of Melchiorre's background. The sleeping Apostles are said to be by Giovanni D'Enrico ; they will not bear comparison with Tabachetti's St. Joseph. The benefactor was Count Pio Giacomo Fassola di Rassa, a collateral ancestor of the historian. People who have become lethargic in their self-indulgence, or who are blinded through some bad habit, will find relief at this chapel. I have met with nothing to show that there was any earlier chapel with the same subject, and in the 1586 edition of Caccia it is expressly mentioned as one of those that as yet were merely contemplated, though the Agony in the Garden itself is de- scribed as completed. ( 166 ) CHAPTER XII. THE PALACE OF PILATE. We now come to the block of several chapels comprised in a building originally designed by Pellegrini at the instance of S. Carlo Borromeo, but not carried out according to his design, and called *^ The Palace of Pilate." This work was begun about 1590, and according to Fassola was not completed till 1660. The figures, however, must have been most of them placed by 1644, for they are mainly by Giovanni D'Enrico, who is believed to have died in that year. The first of these chapels — the Capture of Christ — and probably several others, com- prise some figures taken from earlier chapels. Fassola says that before this building was erected, the old portico built by Milano Scar- rognini stood in the Piazza in front of the Holy Sepulchre, that ''in its circuit of three hundred paces it comprised several mysteries of the passion.'* Among these were probably the present Flagellation, Crowning with Thorns, CAPTURE OF CHRIST. 167 and final Taking of Christ before Pilate chapels. Each of these, however, has undergone some modification. Chapel No. 23. The Capture of Christ. This chapel is in the Palazzo di Pilato block, though not strictly a suffering under Pontius Pilate. The greater number of the sixteen figures that it contains are old, and of wood, and among these are the figures of Christ, Judas, and Malchus, who is lying on the ground. To show how dust and dirt accumu- late in the course of centuries, I may say that Cav. Prof. Antonini told me he had himself unburied the figure of Malchus, which he found more than half covered with earth. We have seen that there are also two figures introduced here which had no connection with the original chapel, I mean of course the old Adam and Eve, who are now doing duty as Roman soldiers. The few remaining figures that are not of wood are given to D'Enrico, and the frescoes are by his brother Melchiorre. Neither figures nor frescoes can be highly praised. The present chapel is not on the site of the old, which I have already explained was on the ground floor of the large house on the visitor's 1 68 EX VOTO. m left as he enters the smaller entrance to the Sacro Monte. The servants were put to lodge above this old and now derelict Capture chapel when the present one was made. The date of the removal is given by Cusa as 1570, who says that the Marchese del Guasto contributed largely to the expense. If the figures were then completed and arranged as we now see them, Giovanni D'Enrico can have had no hand in them, but it is quite possible that some- where about 161 5- 1 61 9, they were again rearranged and perhaps added to. Melchiorre D'Enrico has signed the frescoes in a quasi- cipher and dated them 16 19. The old chapel, though, I think, originally larger than it now is, could not have contained all or nearly all the present figures. Any second rearrangement of the chapel may have been due to its incor- poration in the Palazzo di Pilato block, which we know was not begun till after 1590. That the removal from the original chapel had been effected before 1586 is shown by the fact that the chapel is given in its present geographical sequence in the edition of Caccia published at the end of that year. The work contains no trace of Tabachetti's hand, and this should make us incline towards thinking CHRIST BEFORE ANNAS. 169 that Tabachetti had not yet come to Varallo by 1570. Of the former chapel Fassola says : — " On again descending where formerly was the Capture of Christ, and near the exit [from the Sacro Monte] we came to the porter's lodge. It should be noted that under the porter's room, in the place where the Capture used to be, there are most admirable frescoes by Gaudenzio" (p. 22). With his accustomed reticence where he fears to give offence, he does not say that the frescoes are going to rack and ruin, but this is what he means ; Torrotti expresses himself more freely, saying that a chapel, although derelict, containing paintings by Gaudenzio and his pupils, should not be left to the neglect of servants. These frescoes were removed a year or so ago to the Pinacoteca in the Museum. They are not by Gaudenzio, and are now rightly given to Lanini. They are mere frag- ments, and of no great importance. Chapel No. 24. Christ taken to Annas. This is the one chapel that belongs to the 1 8th century, having been finished about 1765 at the expense of certain Valsesians residing in Turin. It does not belong to the Palazzo di Pilato block, but I deal with it here to avoid I70 EX VOTO. departure from the prescribed order. The design of the chapel is by Morondi, and the figures by Carlantonio Tandarini, except that of Annas, which is by Giambattista Bernesi of Turin. The frescoes are of the usual drop scene, barocco^ academic kind, but where the damp has spared them they form an effective background. The figures want concert, and are too much spotted about so as each one to be seen to the best advantage. This, as Taba- chetti very well knew, is not in the manner of living action, and the attempt to render it on these principles is doomed to failure ; neverthe- less many of Tandarini's individual figures are very clever, and have a good deal of a certain somewhat exaggerated force and character. I have already said that from the plan of 1671 '' The Widow's Son'' would seem to have been formerly on the site of the present Annas chapel. Chapel No. 25. Christ taken before Caiaphas. Cusa says that this chapel, which again is not in the Palazzo di Pilato block, adheres very closely to the design of Pellegrino Tibaldi. The figures, thirty-three in number, are by Plate No. VII. Face p. 170. "CAIAPHAS." By Giovanni D'Enrico. CHRIST BEFORE CAIAPHAS. 171 Giovanni D' Enrico and Giacomo Ferro, and the frescoes being dated 1642, we may think jthe terra-cotta work to be among the last done by D'Enrico on the Sacro Monte. The figure of Caiaphas must be given to him, and it is hard to see how it could have been more dramatically treated. Caiaphas has stepped down from his throne, which is left vacant behind him, and is adjuring Jesus to say whether he is the Christ the Son of God. If it were not for the cobweb between the arm and the body, the photograph which is here given might almost pass as having been taken from life, and the character is so priest-like that it is hard to understand how priests could have tolerated it as they did. Indeed, the figure is so far finer than the general run of Giovanni D'Enrico's work, and so infinitely superior to the four figures of Pilate in the four Pilate chapels, that we should be tempted to give it to some other sculptor if, happily, the Herod did not also show how great D' Enrico could be when he was doing his best, and if the evidence for its having been by him were not so strong. To the left of Caiaphas's empty throne are two standing figures, which look as if they had been begun for figures of Christ, but were con- 172 EX VOTO. demned as not good enough. They may per- haps be intended for Joseph and Nicodemus. Some few of the other figures, which in all number thirty-three, are also full of character, but the greater part of them do not rise above the level of Giacomo Ferro's supers, and suffer from having lost much paint ; nevertheless the chapel is effective, chiefly, doubtless, through the excellence of the Caiaphas himself, and if we could see the work as it was when D'Enrico left it we should doubtless find it more effec- tive still. The frescoes are by Cristoforo Martinolo, also named Rocca. They are not of remark- able excellence, but form an efficient back- ground, and are among the best preserved on the Sacro Monte. They have also the great merit of being legibly signed and dated. Chapel No. 26. The Repentance of St. Peter. Hard by under a portico there is a statue of St. Peter, repentant, and over him there is a cock still crowing. The figure of St. Peter, and presumably that of the cock also, are by D'Enrico. I can find nothing about the date in any author. REPENTANCE OF ST, PETER. 173 This cock is said to have been the chief instrument in a miracle not less noteworthy than any recorded in connection with the Sacro Monte. It seems that on the 3rd of July 1653 a certain Lorenzo Togni from Buccioleto, who had been a martyr to intemperance for many years, came to the Sacro Monte in that state in which martyrs to intemperance must be expected generally to be. It was very early in the morning, but nevertheless the man was drunk, though still just able to go the round of the chapels. Nothing noticeable occurred till he got to the Caiaphas chapel, but here all on a sudden, to the amazement of the man himself, and of others who were standing near, a noise was heard to come from up aloft in the St. Peter chapel, and it was seen that the cock had turned round and was flapping his wings with an expression of great severity. Before they had recovered from their surprise, the bird exclaimed in a loud voice, and with the utmost distinctness, " Ciocc' anch' anc'uei,'* running the first two words somewhat together, and dwelling long on the last syllable, which is sounded like a long French ** eu " and a French " i.'' These words I am told mean, ''Drunk again to-day also .^^ " the ''anc'uei" being a Piedmontese patois for ''ancora oggi." 174 EX VOTO. The bird repeated these words three or four times over, and then turned round on its perch, to all appearance terra cotta again. The effect produced upon the drunkard was such that he could never again be prevailed upon to touch wine, and ever since this chapel has been the one most resorted to by people who wish to give up drinking to excess. The foregoing story is not given either in Fassola or Torrotti, but my informant, a most intelligent person, assured me that to this day the cocks about Varallo do not unfrequently say '' Ciocc* anch' anc uei " — indeed, I have repeatedly heard them do so with the most admirable distinctness. I am told that cocks sometimes challenge, and wish to fight, well- done cocks on crucifixes, but it is some way from this to the cock on the crucifix beginning to crow too. One does not see where this sort of thing is to end, and once terra-cotta always terra-cotta, is a maxim that a respectable figure would on the whole do well to lay to heart and abide by. Chapel No. 27. Christ before Pilate. The Pilate is not nearly so good as the Caiaphas in the preceding chapel, but though CHRIST BEFORE PILATE. 175 there is not one single figure of superlative excellence, this is still one of D' Enrico's best works, and the Pilate is the best of the four Pilates. The nineteen figures are generally ascribed to him ; and, I should say there was less Giacomo Ferro in this chapel than in most of D'Enrico's. Possibly Giacomo Ferro was not yet D'Enrico's assistant The frescoes are by Antonio, or Tanzio, D' Enrico, but I cannot see much in them to admire. The date is given by Bordiga as about 1620, but no date is given either by Fassola or Tor- rotti. The nude figure to the left, seated and holding a spear near the spectator, is said to be a portrait of Tanzio, but Bordiga thinks that if we are to look for the portrait any- where in this composition, we should do so in the open gallery above the gate of the Pretorium, where we shall find a figure that has nothing to do with the story, and re- presents a "jocund-looking" but venerable old man, wearing a hat with a white feather in it) and like the portrait of Melchiorre painted by himself in his Last Judgment — presumably the one outside the church at Riva Valdobbia. Bordiga adds that Melchiorre was still living in 1620, when Tanzio was at work on these frescoes. 176 EX VOTO. Chapel No. 28. Christ before Herod. Bordiga says that this chapel was begun in 1606, as shown by a letter from Monsignor Bescape, Bishop of Novara, authorising the Fabbricieri to appropriate three hundred scudi from the Mass chest for the purpose of erecting it, but it was not finished until 1638. The statues, thirty-five in number, are by Giovanni D'Enrico, and the frescoes by Tanzio, but we have no means of dating either the one or the other accurately. The figure of Herod is incomparably finer than any others in the chapel, if we except those of two laughing boys on Herod's left that are hardly seen till one is inside the chapel itself. Take each of the figures separately and few are good. As usual in D'Enrico's chapels, there is a deficiency of the ensemble and concert which no one except Tabachetti seems to have been able to give in sculptured groups containing many figures ; nevertheless, the Herod and the laughing boys atone almost for any deficiency. Bordiga speaks of the frescoes in the highest terms, but I do not admire them as I should wish to do. They are generally considered as Antonio D'Enrico's finest work on the Sacro Monte. Plate No. VIII. " HEROD.' By Giovanni D'Enrir.o. LJ ^ X 1- Q 2 i CO > o ^ CHRIST TAKEN BACK TO PILATE. 177 The figures behind the two boys' heads coming very awkwardly in my photograph, my Jriend Mr. Gogin has kindly painted them out for me, so as to bring the boys heads out better. Chapel No. 29. Christ taken back to Pilate. | This is supposed to be the last work of Gio- vanni D'Enrico, who, according to Durarfdi, died in 1 644. The scene comprises twenty-three terra-cotta figures, few of them individually good, but nevertheless effective as a whole. One man, the nearest but one to the spectator, must be given to D'Enrico, and perhaps one or two more, but the greater number must have been done by Giacomo Ferro. The frescoes were begun both by Morazzone and Antonio D'Enrico, but Fassola and Torrotti say that neither the one nor the other was able to com- plete the work, which in their time was still unfinished ; but Doctor Morosini was going to get a really good man to finish them without further delay. Eventually the brothers Grandi of Milan came and did the Doric architecture, while Pietro Gianoli did some sibyls, and on the facciata ''zl casto Giuseppe portato da due M 178 EX VOTO. Angiolu' Gianoli signed his work and dated it 1679. We know, then, that in this case the sculptured figures were placed some years before the background, as probably also with several other chapels ; and it may be assumed that generally the terra-cotta figures preceded the background — which was designed for them, and not they for it, except in the case of Gau- denzio Ferrari — who probably conceived both the round and flat work together as part of the same design, and was thus the only artist on the Sacro Monte who carried out the design of uniting painting and sculpture in a single design, under the conditions which strictly it involves. In connection with this chapel both Fassola and Torrotti say that D'Enrico has inten- tionally made Christ's face become smaller and smaller during each of these last scenes, as becoming contracted through increase of suffer- ing. I have been unable to see that this is more than fancy on their parts. It is also in connection with this chapel that we discover the true date of Fassola's book. He says that they had been on the look- out *' during the whole of last year'' — which he gives as 1669 — for some one to finish the frescoes. *' Now, however," he continues, THE FLAGELLATION. 179 " when this book is seeing light," &c. The book therefore should be seeing light in 1670. -It is dated 1671. True, Fassola may have been writing at the very end of 1670, and the book may have been published at the beginning of 167 1, but perhaps the more natural conclu- sion is that the same reasons which make publishers wish to misdate their books by a year now, made them wish to do so then, and that though Fassola s book appeared at the end of 167O5 as would appear from his own words, it was nevertheless dated 1671. Chapel No. 30. The Flagellation. Torrotti and Fassola say that the Christ in this chapel, as well as in all the others, is an actual portrait — and no doubt an admirable one — communicated by Divine inspiration to the many workmen and artists who worked on the Sacro Monte. This, they say, may be known from two documents contemporaneous with Christ Himself, in which His personal appearance is fully set forth, and which seem almost to have been written from the statues now existing at Varallo. The worthy artists who made these statues were by no means given to historical investigations, and were little i8o EX VOTO, likely to know anything about the letters in question ; besides, these had only just been dis- covered, so that there can have been no decep- tion or illusion. Both Fassola and Torrotti give the letters in full, and to their pages the reader who wishes to see them may be referred. Fassola writes : — " Hora vegga ogni diuoto se rassomigliando queste statue al vero Christo essendo lauorate accidentalmente, parendo da Dio sia dato alii Statuarij, e Pittori il lume della sua Diuina Persona non si hk se non per mera sua disposizione e diachiarazione d'hauer quiui quasi come rinouata, e resa piu commoda alia Christianity la sua Redenzione " (p. 103). The work is mentioned as completed in the 1586 edition of Caccia — this, and the Crowning with Thorns, being the only two that are de- scribed as completed of those that now form part of the Palazzo di Pilato block. These two chapels do not in reality, however, belong to the Palazzo di Pilato at all ; they existed lonof before it, and the new work was added on to them. Bordiga says that **an order of Monsignor Bescape relating to this chapel, and dated February i, 1605, shows that there was as yet no plan of this part of the Palace of Pilate." I have not seen this order, arid can only speak with diffidence, but I do not think the chapel has been much modified since 1586, THE FLAGELLATION. i8i beyond the fact that Rocca, whom we have already met with as painting in the Caiaphas chapel in 1642, at some time or another painted a new background, which is now much injured by damp. Not only does the author of the 1586 Caccia mention the chapel, but he does it with more effusion than is usual with him. He rarely says anything in praise of any but the best work. I do not, therefore, think it likely that his words refer to the original wooden figures, two of which were preserved when the work was remodelled ; these two mar the chapel now, and when all the work was of the same calibre it cannot have kindled any enthusiasm in a writer who appears to have known very fairly well which were the best chapels. He says : — "Da manigoldi, in atto acerbo e fiero, Alia colonna Christo flagellato Da scultor dotto assimigliato al vero Di questo'* in un de i lati h dimostrato, E come fusse macerato e nero, D'aspri flagelli percosso, e vergato, Di Christo il sacro corpo in ogni parte, Vi ha sculto dotto mastro in sottil arte." I think the reconstruction of the chapel, then, and its assumption of its present state, except that a fresco background was added, should be * The projected Palazzo di Pilato block. i82 EX VOTO. assigned to some year about 1 580-1 585, and am disposed to ascribe, at any rate, the figure of the man who is binding Christ to the column to Tabachetti, who was then working on the Sacro Monte, and whose style the work seems to me to resemble more nearly than it does that of D'Enrico. Whoever the chapel is by, it was evidently in its present place and much admired in 1586; there could hardly, there- fore, have been any occasion to reconstruct it, especially when so much other work was crying to be done, and when it had, in all probability, been once reconstructed already. On the whole, until external evidence shows D'Enrico to have done the figures, I shall con- tinue to think that at least one of them, and very possibly all except the two old wooden ones, are by Tabachetti. The foot of the man binding Christ to the column has crumbled away, either because the clay was bad, or from insufficient baking. This is why the figure is propped up with a piece of wood. The damp has made the rope slack, so that the pulling action of the figure is in great measure destroyed, its effect being cancelled by its ineffectualness ; but for this the reader will easily make due allowance. The same man reappears presently in the balcony of the Ecce • \ . • 1- . ^ Face p. 182. •MAN IN BACKGROUND OF THE FLAGELLATION CHAPEL." THE CROWNING WITH THORNS. 183 Homo chapel, but he is there evidently done by another and much less vigorous hand. The man in the foreground, who is stooping down and binding his rods, is the same as the one who is kicking Christ in Tabachetti's Journey to Calvary, and is one of those adopted by Tabachetti from Gaudenzio Ferrari's Cruci- fixion chapel ; this figure may perhaps have been an addition by Giovanni D'Enrico, or have been done by an assistant, for it is hardly up to Tabachetti's mark. The two nearest scourgers are fine powerful figures, but I should admit that they remind me rather of D'Enrico than of Tabachetti, though they might also be very well by him, and probably are so. Fassola says that the graces obtainable by the faithful here have relation to every kind of need ; they are in a high degree unspecialised, and that this freedom from specialisation is characteristic of all the chapels of the Passion. Chapel No. 31. The Crowning with Thorns. Much that was said about the preceding chapel applies also to this. It is mentioned in the 1586 edition of Caccia as done '' sot til- mente in natural ritratto,'' and as being one i84 EX VOTO, of the few works that would form part of the Palazzo di Pilato block that were as yet completed. That this chapel had undergone one recon- struction before 1586, we may gather from the fact that the left-hand wall is still covered with a fresco of the Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise ; this has no connection with the Crowning with Thorns, and doubtless formed the background to the original Adam and Eve. I have already said that I am in- debted to Signor Arienta for this suggestion. Bordiga calls this subject Christ being Led to be Crowned, and gives it to Crespi da Cerano, but I cannot understand how he can see in the work anything but an Expulsion from Paradise. The chapel having been reconstructed before 1586 on its present site — as it evidently had been— and being admired, is not likely to have been reconstructed a second time, and I am again, therefore, inclined to give the whole work, or at any rate the greater part of it, to Tabachetti, and to reject the statements of Fassola, Torrotti, Bordiga, and Cusa, who all ascribe the figures to D' Enrico. The two men standing up behind Christ, one taunting Him, and the other laughing, are among the finest on the Sacro Monte, and are much more in THE CROWNING WITH THORNS. 185 Tabachetti's manner than in D'Enrico's. The other figures are, as they were doubtless intended ~ to be, of minor interest. Some of the frescoes other than those above referred to, were added at a later date, and are said by Bordiga, on the authority of a covenant, dated September 27th, 1608, to have been done by Antonio Rantio, who undertook to paint them for a sum of ten ducatoons. They are without interest. It was here the Flemish dancer was healed. His name was Bartholomew Jacob, and he came from Graveling in Flanders. It seems there was a ball going on at the house of one of this man's ancestors, and that the Last Sacraments were being carried through the street under the windows of the ball-room. The dancing ought by rights to have been stopped, but the host refused to stop it, and presently the priest who was carrying the Sacrament found a paper under the chalice, written in a handwriting of almost superhuman neatness, presumably that of the Madonna her- self, and bearing the words, *' Dancer, thou wouldst not stay thy dance : I curse thee, there- fore, that thou dance for nine generations." And so he did, he and all his descendants all their lives, till it came to Bartholomew Jacob, i86 EX VOTO, who was the ninth in descent. He too began life dancing, and was still dancing when he started on a pilgrimage to Rome ; when, how- ever, he got to the Sacro Monte at Varallo on the 7th of January 1646, he began to feel tired, tremulous, and languid from so much incessant movement. This strange feeling attacked him first at the Nativity Chapel, but by the time he got to the Crowning with Thorns he could stand it no longer, and fell as one dead, to rise again presently perfectly whole, and relieved of his distressing complaint. Personally I find this story interesting as giving high support to the theory I have been trying to insist upon for some years past, and according to which in a certain sense a man is personally identical with all the generations in the direct line both of his ancestry and his descendants, as well as with himself. The words '' Thou shalt dance for nine genera- tions" involve one of the most important points contended for in my earlier book, ** Life and Habit." Fassola and Torrotti both say that more pilgrims left alms at this chapel than at any other. In fact they both seem to consider that this chapel did very well. ''Qui" says Torrotti, ''si colgano elemosine assai," and, as I have said already, it is here CHRIST AT STEPS OF PRETORIUM, 187 that a few autumn leaves of waxen images still linger. A few weeks ago I saw the original document in which the story above given was attested. It was dated 1671, and signed, stamped, and sealed as a document of the highest importance. I noticed that in this manuscript, it was a voice that was heard, and not as in Fassola a letter that was found. Chapel No 32. Christ at the Steps of THE PrETORIUM. This is not mentioned in the 1586 edition of Caccia, perhaps as being a poor and unimpor- tant work. Fassola says that some of the frescoes, as well as of the statues, which, he says, are of wood, were by Gaudenzio. The other statues are given both by Fassola and Torrotti to D'Enrico, and the paintings to Gianoli, a wealthy Valsesian amateur who lived at Campertogno. Bordiga gives the statues to Ferro, already mentioned as a pupil of D'Enrico, but whoever did them, they are about as bad as they can be — too bad, I should say, for Giacomo Ferro, and I am not sure that they are not of wood even now. No traces of Gaudenzio's frescoes remain. The i88 EX VOTO, chapel seems to have been reconstructed in connection with the replica of the Scala Santa up which Christ is going to be conducted. We have seen that the design for these stairs was procured from Rome in 1608 by Francesco Testa, who was then Fabbriciere. Chapel No '^'^. Ecce Homo. This is one of the finest chapels, the concert between the figures being better than in most of D' Enrico's other work, notwithstanding the fact that more than one, and probably several, are old figures taken from chapels that were displaced when the Palazzo di Pilato block was made. The figures are thirty-seven in number, and are disposed in a spacious hall not wholly unlike the vestibule of the Reform Club, Christ and His immediate persecutors appearing in a balustraded balcony above a spacious portico that supports it. This must have been one of D'Enrico's first works on the Sacro Monte, the frescoes having been paid for on Dec. 7, 161 2, as shown by Morazzone's receipt which is still in existence, and which is for the sum of 2400 imperiali. Of these frescoes it is impossible to speak highly ; they look clever at first and from a distance, but do not bear closer attention. Face p. 1%. •STEFANO SCOTTO and Mr. S. BUTLER* ECCE HOMO. 189 Morazzone took pains with the Journey to Calvary chapel, which was his first work on the Sacro Monte, but never did anything so good again. Of the terra-cotta figures, the one to the extreme left is certainly by Gaudenzio Ferrari, being another portrait, in nearly the same attitude, of the extreme figure to the left in the Crucifixion chapel. For reasons into which I will enter more fully when I come to this last-named work, I do not doubt that Stefano Scotto, Gaudenzio's master, is the person repre- sented. I had to go inside the chapel to hold a sheet behind the figure in order to detach it from the background, so had myself taken along with it to show how it compares with a living figure. It is generally said at Varallo to be a portrait of Giovanno D'Enrico's brother Tanzio, but this is obviously impossible, for not only does the same person reappear in the Cruci- fixion chapel, but he is also found in Gaudenzio's early fresco of the Disputa in the Sta. Margherita chapel already referred to, and elsewhere, as I will presently show. I should be sorry to say that any other figure in the Ecce Homo chapel except this is certainly by Gaudenzio, but am inclined to think that two or three others are also by him, the rest being probably all of I90 EX VOTO. them by D' Enrico or some assistant. Some — more especially two children, on the head of one of whom a man has laid his hand — are of extreme beauty. The child that is looking up is among the most beautiful in the whole range of sculpture ; the other is not so good, but has suffered in re-painting, the eyelid being made too red ; if this were remedied, as it easily might be, the figure would gain greatly. Cav. Prof. Antonini has very successfully substituted plaster hair for the horsehair, which had in great measure fallen off. The motive of this incidental group is repeated, but with less suc- cess, in Giovanni D'Enrico's Nailing to the Cross. There is another child to the extreme right of the composition so commonly and poorly done that it is hard to believe it can be by the same hand, but it is not likely that Giacomo Ferro had as yet become D'Enrico's assistant. The man who is pointing out Christ to this last-named child is far more seriously treated, and might even be an importation from an earlier work. Among other very fine figures is a man who is looking up and holding a staff in his hand ; he stands against the wall to the spectator's right among the figures nearest to the grating. There is also an admirable figure ECCE HOMO. 191 of a man on one knee tying his cross garter and at the same time looking up. This figure is in the background rather hidden away, and is not very well seen from the grating. I should add that the floor of the chapel slopes a little up from the spectator like the stage in a theatre. The dog in the middle foreground is hollow, as are all the figures, or at any rate many of them, and shows a great hole on the side away from the spectator ; it is not fixed to the ground, but stands on its own legs ; it was as much as I could do to lift it. I am told the figures were baked down below in the town, and though they are most of them in several pieces it must have been no light work carrying them up the mountain. I have been shown the remains of a furnace near the present church on the Sacro Monte, but believe it was only used for the figures made by Luigi Marchesi in 1826. I should, however, have thought that the figures would have been baked upon the Sacro Monte itself and not in the town. Of this chapel Fassola says : — " All the pilgrims of every description come here, because it is at the top of the Scala Santa up which they go upon their knees, and there is plenty of room for pilgrims, as the chapel extends the whole width of the staircase. Those 192 EX VOTO. who are oppressed with travail, or fevers, or lawsuits, or unjust persecutions of any description, are comforted on being commended to this Christ." "Vi sono qui," says Torrotti, " pascoli deliziosi per i curiosi e piu dotti." I daresay that on the great festivals of the Church, some pilgrims may still go up the Scala Santa kneeling, but they do not commonly do so. Often as I have been at the Sacro Monte, I never yet saw a pilgrim mount the staircase except on his feet in the usual way. It must be a very painful difficult thing to go up twenty- eight consecutive high steps on one's knees ; I tried it, but gave it up after a very few steps, and do not recommend any of my readers to even do as much as this. Chapel No. 34. Pilate Washing his Hands. Fassola, Torrotti, and Bordiga all call this one of the best chapels, but neither Jones nor I could see that it was nearly so successful as the preceding. The seventeen modelled figures are by Giovanni D' Enrico, and the frescoes by his brother Antonio or Tanzio. One or two of the figures — especially a man putting his finger to his mouth derisively, are excellent, but the Pilate is a complete failure ; and it is CHRIST CONDEMNED TO DEATH. 193 hard to think it can have been done, as it probably nevertheless was, by the sculptor of the Caiaphas and Herod figures. Bordiga says that a contract was made with Caccia (not the historian), called Moncalvo, for the frescoes. This was the painter who did the backgrounds for the Crea chapels, but the contract was never carried out, probably because Antonio D'Enrico returned from Rome. It was dated November 16 16, so that the terra-cotta figures probably belong to this year or to those that immediately preceded it. Chapel No. 35. Christ Condemned to Death. This is better than the preceding chapel, and contains some good individual figures. The statues are twenty-seven in number, and were modelled by D' Enrico prior to the year 16 14, in which year Morazzone was paid twelve hun- dred imperiali for having painted the frescoes, so that it was one of his earlier works, but the Pilate is again a failure. People who have been badly treated, and who have suffered from some injustice, are more especially recom- mended by Fassola ''to try this Christ, who moves the pity of all who look upon Him." N 194 -EX VOTO. He continues that it was the intention to add some other chapels at the end of the portico of the Palazzo di Pilato, but this intention was not carried out. Bordiga calls attention to the view on the right, looking over Varallo and the Mastallone, as soon as the portico is passed. { 195 ) CHAPTER XIII. MYSTERIES OF THE PASSION AND DEATH. The Palazzo di Pilato is now ended, and we begin with the mysteries of the Passion and Death of the Redeemer, the first of which is set forth in Chapel No. 36. The Journey to Calvary. This, having regard to the terra-cotta figures alone, is by far the finest work on the Sacro Monte, and it is hardly too much to say that no one who has not seen it knows what sculpture can do. I have sufficiently shown that all the authorities, not one of whom has ever so much as seen a page of Caccia, are wrong by at least twenty years, when they say that Tabachetti completed the work in 1606. Bordiga refers, and this time I have no doubt accurately, to a deed drawn up in 1602, in accordance with which the fresco backcrround was begun by Antonio Gandino, a painter of 196 EX VOTO. Brescia ; this alone should have made Bordiga suspect that the terra-cotta work had been already completed, but he does not appear to have noted the fact, and goes on to say that the agreement with Gandino was cancelled by Bishop Bescape in 1604, ^^^ that his work was destroyed, the chapel being handed over to Morazzone, who painted it in 1605, ^^^ ^^s paid 1400 lire, besides twenty gold scudi. Morazzone has followed Gaudenzio boldly, repeating several of his fresco figures, as Tabachetti, with admirable good taste, had repeated several of his terra-cotta ones, while completely varying the action. The right-hand frescoes, and part of those on the wall opposite the spectator, have been recently cut away in squares, and relined, as the wall was perishing from damp. The statues consist of about forty figures of men, women, and children, and nine horses, all rather larger than life. They too have suffered from the effect of damp upon the paint ; never- theless, a more permanent and satisfactory kind of pigment has been used here than in most of the chapels ; the work does not seem to have been much, if at all repainted, since Tabachetti left it. One figure of a child in the foreground has disappeared, the marks of its feet and two THE yOURNEY TO CALVARY. 197 little bits of rusty iron alone show where it was; the woman who was holding it also remains without an arm. I am tempted to think that some disturbing cause has affected a girl who is holding a puppy, a little to the right of this last figure, and doubt whether something that accompanied her may not have perished ; at any rate, it does not group with the other figures as well as these do with one another ; this, however, is a very small blemish. The work is one that will grow upon the reader the more he studies it, and should rank as the most successfully ambitious of medieval com- positions in sculpture, no less surely than Gaudenzio's Crucifixion chapel, having regard to grandeur of scheme as well as execution, should rank as the most daring among Italian works of art in general. I am aware that this must strike many of my readers asnn all pro- bability a very exaggerated estimate, but can only repeat that I have studied these works for the last twenty years with every desire not to let a false impression run away with me, and that each successive visit to Varallo, while tending somewhat to lower my estimate of Giovanni D' Enrico — unless when he is at his very best — has increased my admiration for both Gaudenzio Ferrari and Tabachetti, as 198 EX VOTO. also, I would add, for the sculptor of the Massacre of the Innocents chapel. It cannot, indeed, be pretended that Taba- chetti's style is as pure as that of his great predecessor, but what it has lost in purity it has gained in freedom and vigour. It is not possible that an artist working in the years 1 580-1 585 should present to us traces of the archaism which even the most advanced sculptors of half a century earlier had not wholly lost. The stronger a man is the more certainly will he be modified by his own times as well as modify them, and in an age of barocco we must not look for Donatellos. Still, the more Tabachetti's work is examined the more will it be observed that he took no harm from the barocco, but kept its freedom while avoiding its coarseness and exaggeration. For reasons explained in an earlier chapter his figures are not generally portraits, but he is eminently realistic, and if he did the Vecchietto, of which I have given a photograph at the beginning of this book, he must be credited with one of the most living figures that have ever been made — a figure which rides on the very highest crest of the wave, and neither admits possibility of further advance towards realism without defeating its own purpose, nor TABACHETTI S " STA. VERONICA," And Man with Goitre. THE yOURNEY TO CALVARY, igg shows even the slightest sign of decadence. Of the figure of the Countess of Serravalle, to which I have already referred, Torrotti said it was so much admired in his day that certain Venetian cavaliers offered to buy it for its weight in gold, but that the mere con- sideration of such an offer would be high treason {/esa Maesta) to the Sacro Monte. Fassola and Torrotti, as well as Bordiga and Cusa, are evidently alive to the fact that as far as sculpture goes we have here the highest triumph attained on the Sacro Monte of Varallo. I had better perhaps give the words in which Caccia describes the work. In the 1 586 edition, we read, in the preliminary prose part, as follows : — "Come N. S. e condotto alia morte con la croce alle spalle, qual si vede tutto di rilievo." The poetical account runs thus : — *' Si trova poi in una Chiesa nera Con spettacolo fiero accompagnato Da soldati, e da gente molto fiera, Con la Croce alle spalle incaminato Christo Giesu in mezzo k I'empia schiera, Seguendolo Giovanni addolorato, Che di Giesu sostien la sconsolata Madre, da Maddalena accompagnata." 200 EX VOTO. In the 1 59 1 edition, the prose description of the work runs ; — "Come N.S. h condotto alia morte con la Croce sopra delle spalle, quali si vedeno tutto di rilieuo bellissi." I have no copy of the poetical part of this edition before me, but believe it to be identical with the version already given. The impres- sion left upon me is that the work in 1586 was only just finished enough to allow it to be called finished, and that its full excellence was not yet displayed to the public, though it was about to be so ver^ shortly. Signor Arienta tells me that Tabachetti has adhered rather closely to a design for the same subject by Albert Durer, but I have failed to find the design to which he is referring. Bordiga again calls attention to the extreme beauty of the view of Varallo that is to be had on leaving this chapel. Chapel No. ^7. The Nailing of Christ TO the Cross. This and the two following chapels are on the top of the small rise of some fifteen or twenty feet in which Bernardino Caimi is said to have seen a resemblance to Mount Calvary ; they are approached by a staircase which THE NAILING TO THE CROSS. 201 leads directly to Giovanni D' Enrico's largest work. Bordiga says that the chapel was begun in 1589 at the expense of Marchese Giacomo d'Adda ; he probably, however, refers only to the building itself. It is not mentioned as even contemplated in the 1586 edition of Caccia, nor yet, unless my memory fails me, in that of 1590. It is not known when the terra-cotta work was begun, but it was not yet quite finished in 1644, when, as I have said, D'Enrico died. The frescoes are by Melchiorre Gilardini, and have been sufficiently praised by other writers ; they are fairly well preserved, and show, as in the preceding chapel and in Gaudenzio's Crucifixion, how much more is to be said for the union of painting and sculpture when both are in the hands of capable men, than we are apt to think. If the reader will divest the sculpture of its colour and background, how cold and uninteresting will it not seem in com- parison even with its present somewhat impaired splendour. Looking at the really marvellous results that have been achieved, we cannot refrain from a passing regret at the spite that threw Tabachetti half a century off Gaudenzio, instead of letting them come together, but we must take these things as we find them. 202 EX VOTO. On first seeing Giovanni D'Enrico's Nailing to the Cross we are tempted to think it even finer than the Journey to Calvary. The work is larger, comprising some twenty or so more terra-cotta figures — making about sixty in all — and ten horses, all rather larger than life, but the first impression soon wears off, and the arrangement is then felt to be artificial as com- pared with Tabachetti's. Tabachetti made a great point when, instead of keeping his floor flat or sloping it evenly up to any one side, he threw his stage up towards one corner, which is much higher than any other. The uneven- ness, and irregular unevenness, of the ground is of the greatest assistance to him, by giving him variety of plane, and hence a way of escap- ing monotony without further effort on his part. If D' Enrico had taken his ground down from the corner up to which Tabachetti had led it, he would have secured both continuity with Tabachetti's scene, and an irregularly uneven surface, without repeating his predecessor's arrangement. True, the procession was sup- posed to be at the top of Mount Calvary, but that is a detail. As it is, D'Enrico has copied Tabachetti in making his ground slope, but, unless my memory fails me, has made it slope evenly along the whole width of the chapel, from THE CRUCIFIXION. 203 the foreground to the wall at the back — with the exception of a small mound in the middle background. The horses are arranged all round the walls, and the soldiers are all along- side of the horses, and every figure is so placed as to show itself to the greatest advantage. This perhaps is exaggeration, but there is enough truth in it to help the reader who is unfamiliar with this class of work to apprehend Tabachetti's superiority more readily than he might otherwise do in the short time that tourists commonly have at their disposal. The general impression left upon myself and Jones was that it contains much more of Giacomo Ferro than of D'Enrico ; but in spite of this it is impossible to deny that the work is important and on the whole impressive. Chapel No 38. The Crucifixion. Neither Fassola nor Torrotti date this work, but I have already shown reasons for believing that it should be given to the years 15 24-1 5 28. Fassola says that the figure of Christ on the Cross is not the original one, which was stolen, and somehow or other found its way to the Church of S. Andrea at Vercelli, where, ac- cording to Colombo (p. 237), a crucifix, tradi- 204 EX VOTO. tionally said to be this one, was preserved until the close of the last century. Bordiga says that there is no reason to believe this story. The present crucifix is of wood, and is probably an old one long venerated, and embodied in his work by Gaudenzio himself, partly out of respect to public feeling, and partly, perhaps, as an unexceptionable excuse for avoiding a great difficulty. The thieves also, according to Bordiga and Cusa, are of wood, not terra-cotta, being done from models in clay by Gaudenzio as though the wood were marble. We may be sure there was an excellent reason for this solitary instance of a return to wood, but it is not immediately apparent to a layman. We have met with the extreme figure to the spectator's left in the Ecce Homo chapel. He is also, as I have said, found in the Disputa fresco, done some twenty years or so before the work we are now considering, and we might be tempted to think that the person who was so powerfully impressed on Gaudenzio's mind during so many years was some Varallo notable, or failing this that he was some model whom he was in the habit of employing. This, how- ever, is not so ; for in the first place the sup- posed model was an old man in, say, 1507, < 15 THE CRUCIFIXION. 205 and he is not a day older in 1527, so that in 1527 Gaudenzio was working from a strong residuary impression of a figure with which he had been famiHar many years previously and not from life ; and in the second, we find the head repeated in the works of Milanese artists who in all probability never came near Varallo. We certainly find it in a drawing, of which I give a reduced reproduction, and which the British Museum authorities ascribe, no doubt correctly, to Bernardino de Conti. I also recognise it unquestionably in a drawing in the Windsor collection ascribed to Leonardo da Vinci — a drawing, however, which it is not easy to think is actually by him. I have no doubt that a reminiscence of the same head is intended in a drawing ascribed to Leonardo da Vinci in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana, only that the artist, whoever he may be, has added hair (which is obviously not drawn from nature), and has not produced so good a likeness as Gaudenzio and Bernardino de' Conti have done, but about this last I am less certain. At any rate there can be no doubt that the figure represents a Milanese character who in the time of Gaudenzio's youth was familiar to Milanese artists, and who made a deep impres- sion upon more than one of them. This will 2o6 EX VOTO. be even more apparent to those who are familiar with the terra-cotta figures at Varallo, for these can be seen from several points of view, and a fuller knowledge of the head is thus obtained than a flat impression from a single point can give. It is not likely that the figure is that of a mere model, for it has no, or very little con- nection with the action of the piece, and is evidently placed where it is — the extreme figure to the left, which is always a place of honour — for the sake of introducing the portrait into the composition. Gaudenzio would not have been so impressed, say, with old Christie^ as to give his portrait from memory twenty years after he had seen him last, to put this portrait in the place of honour, and to make the work much more emphatic as a portrait than as the figure of an actor in his drama, inasmuch as he has turned the head towards the spectator and away from the central incident. It is more probable, then, that we must look for some well - known Milanese art- world character as the original for which the figure was intended. We know that Gaudenzio Ferrari studied under Stefano Scotto, and have every reason * A famous model of some five-and-twenty years ago. 'STEFANO SCOTTO and LEONARDO DA VINC! OGHAI^OIJL 131^ IV Fig. T. Profile of Lf.onardo da Vinci by Himself (reversed). P/aie XIX, Stefano Scotto (?). Fvom a Draxoing by Bernardino de' Conti. THE CRUCIFIXION, 207 to think that Bernardino de' Conti — who, I see, studied in the school of Foppa, one of Scotto's predecessors, if not under Scotto himself, must have known him perfectly well. Leonardo da Vinci kept the rival school at Milan, and the two schools were to one another much what those kept by the late Mr. F. S. Cary and Mr. Lee were some thirty years ago in London. Leonardo, therefore, also doubtless knew Scotto by sight if not personally. I incline to think, then, that we have here the original we are looking for, and that Gaudenzio when working at what he probably regarded as the most important work of his life determined to introduce his master, just as I, if I were writing a novel, might be tempted to intro- duce a reminiscence of my own old school- master, and to make the portrait as faithful as I could. I am confirmed in this opinion by noting, as I have done for many years past, that the figure next to that of Scotto is not unlike the portraits of Leonardo da Vinci, of which I give the one (whether by himself or no I do not know) that I believe to be the best. I had been reminded of Leonardo da Vinci by this figure long before I knew of Scotto's existence, and had often wondered why he was not made the 2o8 EX VOTO. outside and most prominent figure ; now, then, that I see reason to think the outside figure intended for Gaudenzio's own master, I under- stand why the preference has been given him, and have little doubt that next to his own master Gaudenzio has placed the other great contemporary art-teacher at Milan whose pupil he never actually was, but whose in- fluence he must have felt profoundly. I also derive an impression that Gaudenzio liked and respected Scotto though he may have laughed at him, but that he did not like Leonardo, who by the way had been dead about ten years when this figure was placed where it now is. I see, therefore, the two figures as those of Scotto and of Leonardo da Vinci, and think it likely that in the one portrait we have by far the most characteristic likeness of Leonardo that has come down to us. In his own drawings of himself he made himself out such as he wanted others to think him ; here, if I mistake not, he has been rendered as others saw him. The portrait of Scotto is beyond question an admirable likeness ; it is not likely that the Leonardo is less successful, and we find in the searching, eager, harassed, and harassing unquiet of the figure here given a THE CRUCIFIXION. 209 more acceptable rendering of Leonardo's char- acter and appearance than any among the -likenesses of himself which are more or less plausibly ascribed to him. The question is one of so much interest that I must defer its fuller treatment for another work, in which I hope to deal with the portraits of Giovanni and Gentile Bellini, and with Holbein's '' Danse des Pay sans." I have, however, given above the greater part of the information of which I am as yet possessed upon the subject. In conclusion, I may say that I mentioned the matter to Signor Boccioloni the Sindaco of Varallo, and to other friends with whom I have discussed the question on the spot, and found that people generally seemed to consider the case as rather a strong one. As regards the portraits supposed to be found on the frescoes, they are all so doubtful that I will refrain from discussing them, but will refer my readers to Colombo. The only exception is a portrait of one of the Scarrognini family which is seen on the right-hand wall above the door, the fact of the portraiture being attested by a barbarous scrawl upon the fresco itself. Caccia says of the work with more enthu- siasm than even I can command, but in a style o 210 EX VOTO. of poetry which I find it fairly easy to render, that we may see among the spectators " , . . . k maraviglia, Vi son pill donne con la sua famiglia; " which means in English — " And here you may behold with wondering eyes, Several ladies with their families." He continues that " Gli Angeli star nel ciel tutti dolenti Si veggon per pieta del suo Signore, E turbati mostrarsi gli elementi, Privi del sole, e d^ ogni suo splendore, E farsi teriremoti, e nascer venti, Par che si veda, d' estremo dolore, E il tutto esser non pinto ne in scultura, Ma dell' istesso parto di Natura. " E se a pieno volessi ricontare Di questo tempio la bellezza, e 1' arte, Le statue, le pitture, e V opre rare, Saria (?) un vergar in infinite carte Che non han queste in tutto il mondo pare, Cerchisi pur in qual si voglia parte, Che di Fidia, Prasitele, e d' Apelle, Ne di Zeuxi non fur V opre si belle*" " Search the world through in whatsoever part, And scan each best known masterpiece of art, In Phidias or Praxiteles or Apelles, You will find nothing that done half so well is." In this translation I have again attempted to Face p. M«. GAUDENZIO FERRARI'S "CRUCIFIXION." The Bad Thief. THE CRUCIFIXION. 211 preserve — not to say pickle — the spirit of the original. Returning to the work as a whole, if the modelled figures fail anywhere it is in respect of action — more especially as regards the figures to the spectator's right, which want the concert and connection without which a scene ceases to be dramatic, and becomes a mere assemblage of figures placed in juxtaposition. It would be going too far to say that complaint on this score can be justly insisted on in respect even of these figures ; nevertheless it will be felt that Gaudenzio Ferrari the painter could harmonise his figures and give them a unity of action which was denied to him as a sculptor. It must not be forgotten that his modelled work derives an adventitious merit from the splendour of the frescoes with which it is surrounded, and from our admiration of the astounding range of power manifested by their author. As a painter, it must be admitted that Gaudenzio Ferrari was second to very few that had gone before him, but as a sculptor, he did not do enough to attain perfect mastery over his art. If he had done as much in sculpture as in painting he would doubtless have been as great a master of the one as the 212 EX VOTO. other ; as it was, in sculpture he never got beyond the stage of being an exceedingly able and interesting scholar ; — this, however, is just the kind of person whose work in spite of imperfection is most permanently delightful. Among the defects which he might have over- come is one that is visible in his earlier paint- ing as well as in his sculpture, and which in painting he got rid of, though evidently not without difficulty — I mean, a tendency to get some of his figures unduly below life size. I have often seen in his paintings that he has got his figures rather below life size, when apparently intending that they should be full- sized, and worse than this, that some are smaller in proportion than others. Neverthe- less, when we bear in mind that the Crucifixion chapel was the first work of its kind, that it con- sists of four large walls and a ceiling covered with magnificent frescoes, comprising about 1 50 figures ; that it contains twenty-six life-sized statues, two of them on horseback, and much detail by way of accessory, all done with the utmost care, and all coloured up to nature, — when we bear this in mind and realise what it all means, it is not easy to refrain from saying, as I have earlier done, that the Crucifixion chapel is the most daringly ambitious work of THE CRUCIFIXION. 213 art that any one man was ever yet known to undertake ; and if we could see it as Gaudenzio left it, we should probably own that in the skill with which the conception was carried out, no less than in its initial daring, it should rank as perhaps the most remarkable work of art that even Italy has produced. ( 214 ) CHAPTER XIV. CHAPEL No. 39. THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. Fassola and Torrotti both say that the terra- cotta figures here are by a pupil of Giovanni D' Enrico. Bordiga says that the three figures forming the group upon the cross were done contemporaneously with the NaiHng of Christ to the Cross, which we have already considered, and are in the style of D'Enrico. If so, they are not in his best style, while the others are among the worst on the Sacro Monte, with the exception of one, which I never even observed until last summer, so completely is it over- powered by the worse than mediocrity with which it is surrounded. This figure is perhaps, take it all round, the finest on the Sacro Monte, and is generally known as " II Vecchietto " or *'the little old man." It is given as the frontis- piece of this book. I was led to observe it by a casual remark made by my old and valued friend Signor THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. 215 Dionigi Negri of Varallo, to whom I am indebted for invaluable assistance in writing this book, and indeed at whose instigation it was undertaken. He told me there was a portrait of the man who gave this part of the ground to the founders of the Sanctuary; he was believed to be a small peasant proprietor — one of the " alcuni particolari poueri " mentioned by Fassola as owning the site — who, having been asked to sell the land, gave it instead. This was the story, but I knew that the land was given not later than 1 490-1493, whereas the chapel in question is not earlier than 1630, when no portrait of the peasant benefactor was possible. I therefore went to the chapel, and finding the figure, saw what must be obvious to any one who looks at it with attention, I mean, firstly, how fine it was, and secondly, that it had not been designed for its present place. This last is clear from the hand, which from outside at first appears to be holding a pair of pincers and a hammer, as though to assist at the Deposition, but which proves to have been originally designed to hold a stick — or some- thing round, the hammer and pincers being at present tied on with a piece of string, to a hand that is not holding them. I asked the opinion of Cav. Prof Antonini of Varallo and his son. 2i6 EX VOTO. both of them admirable sculptors, and found them as decided as myself in their admiration of the figure. Both of them, at different times, were good enough to go inside the chapel with me, and both agreed with me that the figure was no part of the design of the group in which it now is. Cav. Prof. Antonini thought the whole right arm had been restored, but it was getting dusk when he suggested this, and I could not see clearly enough to form an opinion ; I have the greatest diffidence in differ- ing from so excellent an authority, but so far as I could see, I did not think there had been any restoration. I thought nothing had been done except to put a piece of string through the hole in the hand where a stick or roll had been, and to hang the hammer and pincers with it. Leaving Varallo early on the following morn- ing, I was unable to see the figure again by day- light, and must allow the question of restoration or non-restoration to remain unsettled. There is a large well - defined patch of mended ground covering the space occupied by the figure itself. There is no other such patch under any other figure, and the most reasonable inference is that some alteration has been made here. The expression, moreover, of the face is not suitable for a Deposition. THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. 217 There is a holy tranquil smile of joy, thankful- ness, and satisfaction, which perfectly well befits one who is looking up into the heavens, as he might at an Assumption of the Virgin, or an Ascension, but is not the expression which so consummate an artist as the man who made this figure, would give to a bystander at a Deposition from the Cross. Grief and horror, would be still too recent to admit of the sweet serene air of ineffable contentment which is here given. Lastly, the style of the work is so different from that of all the other figures in the chapel, that no solidarity can be seen between it and them. It would be too much to say that the others are as bad as this is good, but the difference between Rembrandt's old woman in our National Gallery and an average Royal Academy portrait of fifty years ago, is not more striking than that between the Vec- chietto and his immediate neighbours. I can find no mention of the figure in Fassola, or Torrotti. Bordiga says, *' On the left there is a man in peasant's costume, hold- ing his hat in reverence of Jesus, and said to be a benefactor of the chapel.'' He does not say anything about the excellence of the work- manship, nor, indeed, have I heard any one, 2i8 EX VOTO. except the two sculptors, Cav. Prof. Antonini and his son, speak of the work in terms which showed a perception of its merit. If the world knows little of its greatest men it seems to know not much more about its greatest works of art, nor, if it continues to look for guidance in this matter to professional critics and society art-dabblers, is it likely to improve its know- ledge. Cusa says of it : — " fi fra essi un vecchietto naturale assai pel rozzo costume che veste, e per la semplicitk del atto ; egli guarda Gesii in atto di levarsi il cappello, mentre con Taltra mano tiene le tenaglie ed il martello. Lo si dice ritratto di un Rimellese, benefattore della cappella." I asked the two sculptors Antonini if they could help me in settling the question to whom the work should be assigned, and they agreed with me that it could not be given to Gaudenzio. It is too masterly, easy, and too like the work of Velasquez in painting, to be by one who is not known to have done more in sculpture than some two score or so of figures on the Sacro Monte now remaining, and a few others that have been lost. The Vecchietto is the work of one to whom modelling in clay was like breathing, walking, or eating and drinking, and Gaudenzio never reached such freedom and proficiency as this. THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. 219 With few exceptions even the best art-work falls into one of two classes, and offers signs either of immaturity or decline. Take Dona- tello, and Luca della Robbia, or, in painting, Giovanni Bellini, John Van Eyck, Holbein, Giotto, and even Gaudenzio Ferarri in his earlier work; take again, in music, Purcell and Corelli ; no words of affectionate admira- tion are good enough for any one of these great men, but they none of them say the last word that is to be said in their respective arts. Michael Angelo said the last word ; but then he said just a word or two over. So with Titian and Leonardo Da Vinci, and in music with Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. We admire them, and know that each in many respects surpassed everything that has been done either before or since, but in each case (and more especially with the three last named) we feel the presence of an autumnal tint over all the luxuriance of development, which, while hardly detracting from the pleasure we receive, still tells of an art that has taken not an upward but a downward path. I know that I am apt to take fancies to works of art and artists ; I hold, for example, that my friend Mr. H. F. Jones's songs, of which I have given the titles at the end of this volume, are finer than an 220 EX VOTO. equal number of any written by any other living composer — and I believe that people will one day agree with me, though they will doubt- less take their time in doing so — but with all this tendency towards extravagance I endea- vour to preserve a method in my madness, and with most works find that they fall readily into the growing or the decaying. It is only with very few, as with Homer and Shakespeare at their best, the Venus of Milo, the Ilyssus, the finest work of Rembrandt, Giorgione, and Velasquez, and in music with Handel, that I can see no step left unclimbed, yet none taken on the downward path. Assuredly the Vecchietto must be classed with the very few works which, being of the kind of fruit that they are, are dead ripe, without one trace either of immaturity or decay. Difficult, however, as the problem who made this statue is, it is simplified by the reflection that it can only be given either to Gaudenzio or Tabachetti. I suggested D'Enrico's name to Cav* Prof. Antonini to see how he received it, but — thinking doubtless more of Giacomo Ferro than of D'Enrico — he said ** E-whew,'* and tossed his thumb over his shoulder, as only an Italian can, as much as to say that D'Enrico set about his figures with too light a heart to THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. 221 get a Vecchietto out of them ; Gaudenzio, then, being impossible and D' Enrico ordered out of court, it only remains to give the work to Tabachetti, with whose sleeping St. Joseph and with not a little else of whose work it presents much analogy ; for the notion that a stranger of name unknown came to Varallo, did this single figure, and then went away without doing any more either there or any- where else in the least like it, is as incredible as that it is the work of D'Enrico. As for the question of the source from which the figure came we should remember that the Chiesa Vecchia delV Assunta was pulled down at the end of the last century ; and this, con- sidering the excellent preservation in which the Vecchietto is still found, and the compara- tively recent appearance of the disturbance of the ground under his feet, seems the most likely place for him to have come from. There were two opportunities in this church, one of which certainly was, while the other very well might have been, made the occasion for a group of figures with upturned heads. The first of these, of course, is the Assumption of the Madonna, of which Caccia says there was a representation of her " Come ascese in Cielo^ con le statue delli dodeci Apostoli intorno di 222 EX VOTO. rilievo,'' and there may very well have been a benefactor or so in addition. The second was the impress of our Saviour's last footprint on the Mount of Olives before He ascended into heaven. This is mentioned by Fassola as a feature of special importance, and as having had an indulgence conceded to it by the Pope in 1488 while it was on its road from Jeru- salem. This relic was held in great veneration, and it is easy to imagine that its effect may have been enhanced by surrounding it with figures looking upwards into the heavens to- wards the clouds that had already received the body of the Redeemer. All this, however, is mere conjecture, for there is not a tittle of evidence in support of it, and we are left practi- cally with nothing more than we can still see within the limits of the figure itself to give a clue either to its maker, or the source from which it came, but we may incline to think that it is the portrait of a benefactor, for no one but a benefactor would have been treated with so much realism. The man is not a mere peasant ; his clothes are homely, but they are good, and there is that about him which har- monises well enough with his having been in a position of comfort. Common peasants may be seen in the Shepherd's chapel, and the THE DESCENT FROM THE CROSS. 223 Vecchietto is clearly of higher social status than these. He looks like a Valsesian yeoman or peasant proprietor, of some substance ; and he was doubtless a benefactor, not of this, but some other chapel. I have said there are analogies between this figure and others by Tabachetti which after all make it not very difficult to decide the question to whom it should be given. We do not, indeed, find another Vecchietto, but we shall find more than one figure that exhibits equal truth to nature, and equal freedom from exaggeration. It is not possible, for example, to have greater truth to nature than we find in the figures of Adam and Eve in the first chapel. There is not one trace either of too much or too little, of exaggeration or of short- coming ; the nude figure of a man and of a woman were wanted, and the nude figure of a man and of a woman are given, with neither more or less modelling than what would be most naturally seen in a young and comely couple. So again with the charming figure of the Virgin sewing in the First Vision of St. Joseph chapel. The Virgin and the Vecchietto are as unlike each other as two figures can be, but they are both stamped with the same freedom from affectation, and the same absolute 224 ^X VOTO, and easy mastery over the means employed. The same applies to the sleeping St Joseph, in which case there is a closer analogy between the two figures themselves. It applies also to a not inconsiderable extent to the man with a goitre who is leading Christ in the Calvary chapel. This figure is not done from life, being a repetition of one by Gaudenzio, but it is so living that we feel sure it would have been more living still if Tabachetti had had the model before him from which Gaudenzio in all probability actually worked. At Crea, there are other figures by Tabachetti to which I will call attention presently, and which present not inconsiderable analogies to the Vecchietto. I explain the fact that the analogies are not closer, by reflecting that this is the one of the few cases in which Tabachetti has left us a piece of portrait work, pure and simple, and that his treatment of the head and figure in pure portraiture, would naturally differ from that adopted in an ideal and imaginative work. ( 225 ) CHAPTER X\r. THE PI ETA AND REMAINING CHAPELS. The remaining chapels are few in number, and, whatever they may once have been, unim- portant in character. The first is Chapel No. 40. The PietA. The three preceding chapels are supposed to be on Mount Calvary, and from them we descend by a flight of stone steps to the level of the piazza. Immediately on reaching this we come upon the Pieta. We have seen that this chapel originally contained Gaudenzio's Journey to Calvary, and that the fresco back- ground still, in so far as it is not destroyed, treats this subject, while the modelled figures represent the Pieta. Of Gaudenzio's original work Caccia says : — " Come fu Christo de' panni spogliato, Montando il Monte poi Calvario detto, Nel mezzo a manigoldi iiial trattato, Contemplar possi con pietoso affetto, P 2 26 EX VOTO. Seguito da Maria e da I'ainato Discepolo di lui, et h Teffetto Sculto si bene e doitamente fatto Che sembra vero e non del ver ritratto." " Per una scala asceso al Sacro Monfe Si entra nel piu d'ogn' altro sacro tempio," &c. The words ** montando il monte poi^^ &c., must refer to a supposed ascent on the part of Christ Himself, for Gaudenzio's work was on a level with Tabachetti's present Journey to Calvary which Caccia has just described, and Caccia goes on to say that from Gaudenzio's chapel (the present Pieta) one '* ascends by a staircase to " the most sacred chapel of all — the Crucifixion — as one does at present. That the present Pieta and the adjacent Entombment chapels were once one chapel, may be seen by any one who examines the vaulting inside the first-named chapel. Signor Arienta pointed this out to me, and at the same time called my attention to the fact that Gaudenzio's fresco on the wall facing the spectator does not turn the corner and join on with the subject that fills the left-hand wall. A flag and a horse are cut off, and the rest of them is not seen. I sometimes question whether the original wooden-figured entomb- ment was in the chapel in which the present THE PIETA. 227 modern figures are seen, but it probably was so. There was also a fainting Madonna men- tioned in the prose part of Caccia as a work by itself and described as follows : — "Come la Madonna h tramortita vedendo N.S. con- dotto k morte." This is not referred to in the poetical part, and must have been a mere cell occupied by a single figure. No doubt it was seen through the window that is still approached by two steps on the south side of the present Pieta, and the space it occupied has been thrown into the present work. I do not know when Gaudenzio's Journey to Calvary was dispersed, but it was some time, doubtless, between 1600 and 1644. It is puzzling to note that the Pieta appears in the plan of 1671 as situated rather in the part of the building now occupied by the Entomb- ment than by the Pieta, while the 39 that should mark the site of the Entombment does not appear ; but this is perhaps only an error in the plan itself. I find, however, the attempt to understand the changes that have taken place here so difficult that I shall abandon it and will return to the present aspect of the work. 228 EX VOTO. Torrotti says that some of the statues in the present chapel are by Gaudenzio, which they are not. Fassola gives them all to Giovanni D'Enrico ; Bordiga speaks of the work in the highest terms, but for my own part I do not admire it, nor, I am afraid, can I accept the more fresh-looking parts of the fresco back- ground as by Gaudenzio. I do not doubt that his work has been in these parts repainted, and that the outlines alone are really his. It is not likely we have lost much by the repainting, for where the work has not been touched it has so perished as to be hardly worth preserving, and we may think that what has been repainted was in much the same state. This is the only chapel in which Gaudenzio's frescoes at Varallo have been much repainted. If those in the Crucifixion and Magi chapels have been retouched they have taken little harm ; the frescoes in the church of Sta. Maria delle Grazie have certainly not been touched, and are in such good preserva- tion that it may be questioned whether they ever looked much better than they do now. The fine oil picture in the church of S. Gaudenzio has gone a little yellow through the darkening of the oil, but is in a good state, and generally, though no painter of the highest THE ENTOMBMENT. 229 rank has been so much neglected, or suffered more from the actual destruction of his works, yet for the most part Gaudenzio has been spared the reckless restoration which is the most cruel ill that can befall an artist. Chapel No. 41. The Entombment. We have already seen that this was the first chapel with figures in it on the Sacro Monte. Of the old eight wooden figures that it con- tained, two are still on the mountain in a sort of vault adjacent to, or under, the main church, and near the furnace in which those that super- seded them were baked. Six are in the Museum at Varallo. I saw them a few weeks ago, not yet arranged, leaning up against the wall with very battered and dilapidated glories ; the recumbent Christ was standing more or less on end, and the whole group was in a pathetic state of dismemberment that will doubtless soon make way for a return to their earlier arrangement. The figures are interest- ing, but it cannot be pretended that they are of great value. They look very much as if they had been out somewhere the night before. Of the figures in the present chapel the less said the better. 230 EX VOTO. Remaining Chapels and Chiesa Maggiore. The chapel of St. Francis is open to the air, and contains nothing but an altar, and a modern fresco of the death of the saint. Near it is the Holy Sepulchre, which is entered from a small cell in which there is a figure of the Magdalene, and from which the visitor must creep on hands and knees into the Sepulchre itself. The figure of Christ is not actually in the Sepulchre, but can be seen through a window opening into the contiguous chapel, where it is over the altar. The early writers say that there were also two angels by Gaudenzio (statue di Gaudenzio divotissime), but Bordiga says nothing of this. The upper part of this building was the abode of Ber- nardino Caimi and his successors until the year 1577. As for the Holy Sepulchre itself it is low and dark, which I have no doubt is the reason why I have neglected it on the occasions of each of my two latest visits to Varallo, and thus failed to reach the adjacent Oratory, which Bordiga says was erected about the year 1702. Fassola and Torrotti wrote before this date, so that the angels mentioned by them as by REMAINING WORKS. 231 Gaudenzio may have been removed when the present fabric was erected. At any rate Bor- diga speaks as though they were paintings by one Tarquinio Grassi and not sculptured figures at all. Torrotti says that visitors to the Holy Sepulchre used to burn candles, tapers, and torches, each one according to his purse or piety, and that they did this not so much to see with as to pray. ^' Here," he continues, ^* the great S. Carlo spent his evenings agree- ably " {spendeva gradevolmente le notti). " Few," he concludes drily, and perhaps with a shade of the same quiet irony that led the Psalmist to say what he did about ^' one " day in certain courts, '* can leave it without feeling devoutly thankful." About the candles Fassola says that there was a kind of automatic arrange- ment for getting them like that whereby we can now buy butter-scotch or matches at the railway stations, by dropping a penny into a slot. He says : — "And as the figure of Christ can only be seen by the help of candles (for which reason all pilgrims whose means permit are accustomed to burn them, being naturally prompted thereto each one according to his faith) — by throwing money into a hole wherein the same candles lie, each pilgrim can be made quite comfortable and contented." [" Gettando 11 denaro per un buco dove stanno le mede- 232 EX VOTO. sime candelette, commodamente pub restar ogni divoto contento.''] " The mercies" vouchsafed here," continues the same writer; "are innumerable — in all parts may be seen votive pictures both old and recent." In the open cloister hard by is shown the wooden bed on which S. Carlo lay when he came to visit the Sacro Monte, and the stone which is said to be a fac-simile of the one rolled in front of the Holy Sepulchre itself Many years ago I spent several weeks at Varallo sketching and painting on the Sacro Monte. A most excellent and lovable old priest, now doubtless long since dead, took rather a fancy to me, and used to implore me to become a Catholic. One day he took me up to this stone and spoke long and earnestly about it. What a marvel- lous miracle it was. There was the stone ; I could see it for myself What a dumb but eloquent testimony was it not offering ; how could I account for such things ? and more to the same effect, all said obviously in good faith, and with no idea save that of guiding me to the truth. I was powerless. I could not go into facts or arguments — I could not be obstinate without getting something like his consent — and he was instant in season and out of season in endeavouring to get mine. At last I could stand it no longer, and said, ''My REMAINING WORKS. 233 dearest sir, I am the son of an English clergy- man who is himself the son of another English clergyman ; my father and mother are living. If you will tell me that I am to hold my father born in more than common sin, to have com- mitted a crime in marrying my mother, and that I am to hold myself as one who ought never to have been born, then I will accept what you have said about that stone. Till then let me go my way, and you yours." He said not a word more, and never again approached the subject ; the nearest he ever went to it was to say that he liked to see me sketching about the Sacro Monte, for it could do me nothing but good. I trust that I have done it no harm. The chapel representing the Magdalene at the feet of the risen Christ has disappeared. It contained two statues only, and two prophets by Gaudenzio were painted outside on the wall. It stood " So^^o un auanzo dei Portici antic hi seguentemente al Sepolcror It was pro- bably a very early work. Through an arch under the raised portico or arcaded gallery are three small ruined cells called now " II Paradiso," and numbered 43, 44, and 45 ; of one of these Fassola tells us that it contained '' many modern statues '' by 234 EX VOTO. ' Gaudenzio Sceti, and frescoes by Gianoli ; they are all now mere wrecks. There is no impor- tant work by Gaudenzio Sceti remaining on the Sacro Monte, but there is a terra-cotta crucifix with a Virgin and a St. John by him, of no great value, in the church of S. Gaudenzio. What remains of his work on the Sacro Monte itself consists of statues of Sta. Anna and the Virgin as a child upon her lap in the chapel or cell numbered 43. Chapel 44 need not detain us. What few remains of figures it contains are uninteresting and ruined. I have already spoken of chapel No. 45, which once represented an entombment of the Madonna, as in all probability the oldest build- ing, and as certainly containing the oldest, and by no means least interesting frescoes on the Sacro Monte. There is nothing inside the chapel except these frescoes, but outside it there are many scrawls, of which the earliest I have noticed is 1520 — the supposed 1437 being certainly 1537. The writer of one of these scrawls has added the words '' fuit hie " to his signature as John Van Eyck has done to the signature of his portrait of John Arnolfini and his wife. I have found this addition of " fuit hie" in a signature of a certain *' Cardinalis [REMAINING WORKS. 235 de al . . " who scratched his name " 1389 die 19 Mag" on a fresco to the left of the statue of S. Zenone in the church S. Zenone at Verona. On a fresco in the very interesting castle of F6nis in the valley of Aosta, to which I hope to return in another work, there is scratched *' Hie sponsus cum sponsi fuit 1790 25 May," the " May " being an English May ; Jones and I thought the writer had begun to add '' London " but had stopped. The '' fuit hie," therefore, of John Van Eyck's signature should not be translated as we might be tempted to wish to translate it, " This was John Van Eyck." Returning to the Sacro Monte, there remains only the Chiesa Vecchia, removed at the end of the last century to make room for the build- ing that was till lately the " casa degli esercizil' or house in which the priests on the mountain performed their spiritual exercises. This is now let out in apartments during the summer, and is called the Casino. The old sacristy, now used as the archivio of the Sacro Monte, still remains, and contains a fresco by Lanini, that bears strong traces of the influence of his master Gaudenzio. Besides the impress of Christ's foot and the Assumption of the Virgin, the church contained an Annunciation by Gaudenzio and frescoes of St. Catherine and 236 EX VOTO. St. Cecilia ; the Cupola was also decorated by him. This work was undertaken in 1530, the greater angels being by Gaudenzio and the smaller by Lanini and Fermo Stella. These frescoes all perished when the church was pulled down. The present Chiesa Maggiore was begun on the 9th of June 16 14 — D'Enrico^s design having, so Bordiga says, been approved on the ist of April in that year. Fassola says that in 1 67 1 the only parts completed were the Choir and Cupola, the whole body of the church being left unfinished. Bordiga speaks of the church as having been finished in 1649, in which year, on the feast of the Birth of the Virgin, her image was taken from the old church and placed in the new, so when Fassola says ''unfinished" he must refer to decoration only. The steps leading up to the church and the unfinished columns were erected in 1825 from designs by Marchese Don Luigi Cagnola, the architect of the Arco della Pace at Milan. It was ere long found that the stone selected was unreliable, so that all must be done over again ; the work has, therefore, been suspended. The Cupola is covered with about 140 modelled figures of angels, by Dionigi Bussola and Giambattista Volpino, Milanese sculptors, REMAINING WORKS. 237 who worked from designs made by Antonio Tempesta, a Florentine. They did this work -about the year 1660. The brothers Montalti painted the frescoes, some more highly coloured groups being added by Antonio Cucchi of Milan in 1750. In the crypt there is a sumptuous shrine con- taining the statue of the Madonna, said to have been made by St. Luke. This was erected in 1854, but on the night between the 4th and 5th of October in the same year the crown was stolen from the Virgin's head, and in the following year there was a solemn expiatory function, with festivities extending over three days, in order to celebrate the replacing of the stolen crown by a new one. It cannot be said that any of the works of art now in the church are of considerable interest, but an important work of art was nevertheless produced in it at the celebration of the fourth centenary of the birth of Gaudenzio Ferrari, which was held in 1885. I refer to the Mass by Cagnoni, which was here performed for the first time, and which showed that the best traditions of old Italian ecclesi- astical music are still occasionally adhered to. I was present at the production of the work, and have heard no modern Italian music that has 23S EX VOTO. pleased me nearly as much. I ventured to ask the Maestro for the baton he had used in conducting it, and am proud to keep it as a memorial of a fine performance of a very fine work. The baton is several old newspapers neatly folded up and covered with silk. ( 239 ) CHAPTER XVI. TABACHETTPS WORK AT CRBA. I HAVE now to add a short account of what remains of Tabachetti's work at Crea, to the very inadequate description of his work at Varallo that has been given in some earlier chapters. Crea is most easily approached from Casale, a large opulent commercial town upon the Po, that has already received the waters of the Dora Baltea, and though not yet swelled by the influx of the Ticino and Adda, has become a noble river. The town is built entirely on the plain, but the rich colline of the Monferrato district begin to rise immediately outside it, and continue in an endless series of vineclad slopes and village-capped hill-tops as far as the eye can reach. These colline are of exquisite beauty in themselves, and from their sides the most magnificent views of Piedmont and the Alps extend themselves in every direction. The people are a well-grown comely race, kind and 240 EX VOTO. easy to get on with. Nothing could exceed the civility and comfort of the Hotel Rosa Rossa, the principal inn of the city. The town contains many picturesque bits, but in our short stay we did not see any very remarkable archi- tectural features, and it does not form an ex- ception to the rule that the eastern cities of Northern Italy are far more beautiful than the western. The churches, never one would imagine very striking, have been modernised and restored ; nor were we told that there is any collection of pictures in the town which is likely to prove of interest. The visitor should leave Casale by the 7.58 A.M. train on the line for Asti, and get out at Serralunga, the third station on the road. Here the sanctuary of Crea can be seen crowning a neighbouring collina with a chapel that has an arcaded gallery running round it, like some of those at Varese. Many other chapels testify to the former importance of the place ; on the whole, however, the effect of the buildings cannot compare with that of the sanctuaries of Varallo and Varese. Taking a small carriage, which can always be had at the station (fare, to the sanctuary and back, eight francs), my friend, Mr. H. F. Jones, and myself ascended to Serralunga, finding the TABACHETTFS WORK AT CREA. 241 views continually become more and more be- witching as we did so ; soon after passing .through Serralunga we reached the first chapel, and after another zigzag or two of road found ourselves in the large open court in front of the church. Here there is an inn, where any one who is inclined to do so could very well sleep. The piazza of the sanctuary is some two thousand feet above the sea, and the views are in some respects finer even than those from the Sacro Monte of Varese itself, inasmuch as we are looking towards the chain of the Alps, instead of away from them. We have already seen that the sanctuary at Crea was begun about 1590, a hundred years or so later than the Sacro Monte of Varallo, and a dozen years earlier than that of Varese. The church attached to the convent, in which a few monks still remain, contains a chapel with good frescoes by Macrino D'Alba ; they are somewhat damaged, and the light is so bad that if the guardiano of the sanctuary had not kindly lent us a candle we could not have seen them. It is not easy to understand how they can have been painted in such dark- ness; they are, however, the most important work of this painter that I have yet seen, and give a more favourable impression of him than Q 242 EX VOTO. is likely to be formed elsewhere. Behind the high altar there is an oil picture also by Macrino d'Alba, signed as by the following couplet, which they may scan who can : " Hoc tibi, diva parens, posuit faciente Macrino . Bladratensis opus Johes ille Jacobus. 1503." The '' Macrino," and " 1503," are in red paint, the rest in black. The picture is so dark, and the view of it so much obstructed by the high altar, that it is impossible to see it well, but it seemed good. There is nothing else in the church, nor need the frescoes in the chapels containing the terra-cotta figures be considered ; we were told they were painted by Caccia, better known as Moncalvo, but we could see nothing in them to admire. The sole interest of the sanctuary — except, of course, the surpass- ing beauty of its position — is vested in what few remains of Tabachetti's work may be found there, and in the light that these may throw upon what he has left at Varallo. All the work by Tabachetti now remaining at Crea consists of the Martyrdom of St. Eusebius chapel, almost all of which is by him, perhaps a figure or two in the Sposalizio chapel, but certainly not the figures of St. Joseph and the Virgin, which are not even ascribed to him. TABACHETTFS WORK AT CREA, 243 the Virgin in the Annunciation chapel, some parts of the Judith and Holofernes, with which this subject is strangely backed; some few of the figures in the Marriage Feast at Cana chapel, and lastly, the wreck, which is all that remains, of the Assumption of the Virgin — commonly called " II Paradiso.'' All the other chapels are either in a ruined state or have been re- newed with modern figures during the last thirty years, and more especially during the last ten, at the instance, and, as we understood, at the expense, of the present Archbishop of Milan, who does his campagna here every summer. The most important chapel is the Martyr- dom of St. Eusebius, below the sanctuary itself. The saint is supposed to have been martyred in front of the church of St. Andrea at Vercelli. Some four or so of the figures to the spectator's right are modern restorations ; among them, however, there is a child of extreme sweetness and beauty, which must certainly be by Taba- chetti, looking up and clinging to the dress of its mother, who has been restored, and is as commonplace as the child is the reverse. There are two restored or rather entirely new priests close by the mother and child, and near these is another new figure — a girl immediately to the child's right ; this is so absurdly bad 244 EX VOTO. and out of proportion that it is not easy to understand how even the restorer can have allowed himself to make it. All the rest of the figures are by Tabachetti. A little behind the mother and child, but more to the spectator's right, and near to the wall of the chapel, there stands a boy one of whose lower eyelids is paralysed, and whose expression is one of fear and pain. This figure is so free alike from exaggeration or shortcoming, that it is hard to praise it too highly. Another figure in the background to the spectator s left — that of a goitred crdtin who is handing stones to one of the stoners, has some of the same remarkably living look as is observable in the two already referred to ; so also has another man in a green skull-cap, who is holding a small battle-axe and looking over the stoner's shoulders. Two of the stoners are very powerful figures. The man on horseback, in the background, appears to be a portrait probably of a benefactor. In spite of restoration, the work is still exceedingly impressive. The figures behind the saint act well together, the crowd is a crowd — a one in many, and a many in one — not, as with every one except Tabachetti who has tried to do a crowd in sculpture, a mere collection of units, that, whatever else they may be, are certainly TABACHETTPS WORK AT CREA. 245 not crowding one another. The main draw- back of the work is that the chapel is too small for the subject — a matter over which Taba- chetti probably had no control. It is with very great regret that I have been unable to photograph the work, but I was flatly refused permission to do so, though I applied through influential people to the Archbishop himself. No one need be at the trouble of going to see it who is not already impressed with a sense of Tabachetti's in some respects un- rivalled genius, and who does not know how to take into consideration the evil influences of all sorts with which he was surrounded ; those, however, who realise the magnitude of the task attempted, who will be at the pains of putting themselves, as far as may be, in the artist's place and judging of the work from the stand-point intended by him, and who will also in their imagination restore the damage which three centuries of exposure and restoration must assuredly have involved, will find them- selves rewarded by a fuller comprehension of the work of a sculptor of the foremost rank than they can attain elsewhere except at Varallo itself. I have said that some of the figures in the Sposalizio chapel, except Joseph and Mary, are 246 EX VOTO. ascribed to Tabachetti. I do not know on what grounds the ascription rests ; they have been restored, — clogged with shiny paint, and suffered every ill that could well befall them short of being broken up and carted away. Any one who sampled Tabachetti by these figures might well be disappointed ; two or three may be by him, but hardly more. In spite, however, of all that may be justly urged against them, they are marked by the same attempt at concert and unity of purpose w^hich goes so far to redeem individual comparative want of interest. In the background is a coloured bas-relief of Rachel and Jacob at the well and five camels. In the Annunciation chapel the Virgin may well be^ as she is said to be, by Tabachetti ; she is a very beautiful figure, though not so fine as his Madonna and Child in the church of St. Gaudenzio at Varallo ; she has been badly painted, and it is hard to say how much she has not suffered in consequence. Some parts of the story of Judith and Holofernes in the background are also good, but I do not think I should have seen Tabachetti in them unless I had been told that he was there. The wreck of the chapel commonly called ''II Paradiso" crowns the hill, conspicuous for TABACHETXrS WORK AT CREA. 247 many a mile in every direction, but on reaching the grating we found no trace of the figures that doubtless once covered the floor of the chapel. All that remained was a huge pendant of angels, cherubs, and saints, swarming as it were to the ceiling in an inextricable knot of arms, legs, wings, faces, and flowing drapery ; two circles of saints, bishops, and others, who might be fitly placed in Paradise, rising one above the other high up the walls of the chapel — the lower circle full-length figures, and the other half-length ; and above this a higher and richly coloured crown of musical saints and angels in good preservation. In passing I may say that this is the place where the Vecchietto ought to have come from, though it is not likely that he did so. The pendant retains much of its original colour, and must once have been a gorgeous and fitting climax. Still, no one can do much with such a subject. To attempt it is to fly in the face of every canon by the observance of which art can alone give lasting pleasure. It is to crib, cabin, and confine, within the limits of well-defined sensation and perception, ideas that are only tolerable when left in the utmost indefiniteness consistent with thought at all. It is depressing to think that he who could 248 EX VOTO. have left us portrait after portrait of all that was noblest and loveliest in the men and women of his age — who could give a life such as no one but himself, at any rate at that time, could give — should have had to spend months if not years upon a work that even when new can have been nothing better than a magni- ficent piece of stage decoration. But of such miscarriages the kingdom of art is full. In the kingdom of art not only are many called and few chosen, but the few that do get chosen are for the most part chosen amiss, or are lavished in the infinite prodigality of nature. We flatter ourselves that among the kings and queens of art, music, and litera- ture, or at any rate in the kingdom of the great dead, all wrongs shall be redressed, and patient merit shall take no more quips and scorns from the unworthy : there, if an able artist, as, we will say, F. H. Potter just dead, dies poor, neglected, and unable to fight his way through the ranks of men with not a tenth part of his genius, there, at any rate, shall right be done ; there the mighty shall be put down from his seat, and the lowly and meek, if clever as well as good, shall meet his just reward. It is not so. There is no circle so exalted but the dfevil has got the run of it. As for the reputations TABACHETTFS WORK AT ORE A, 249 of the great dead, they are governed in the main by the chicane that obtains among the living ; it is only after generations of flourish- ing imposture, that even approximate right gets done. Look at Raphael, see how he still reigns supreme over those who have the people's ears and purses at command. True, Guido, Guercino, and Domenichino have at last tumbled into the abyss, and we know very well that Raphael will ere long fall too, but Guido, Guercino, and Domenichino had a triumph of some two hundred years, during which none dared lift hand against them. Look again at that grossest of impostors — Bacon. Look at by far the greater number of the stan- dard classical authors, painters, and musicians. All that can be said is that there is a nisus in the right direction which is not wholly in vain, and that though tens of thousands of men and women of genius are as dandelion seeds borne upon the air and perishing without visible result, yet there is here and there a seed that really does take root and spring upwards to be a plant on the whole more vigorous than that from which it sprung. Right and truth and justice, in their relation to human affairs, are as asymptotes which,' though continually drawing nearer and nearer to the curve, can never 250 EX VOTO. reach it but by a violation of all on which their own existence is founded. As for the Assumption chapel, those who would see it even as a wreck should lose no time ; it is in full process of restoration ; it is swept and garnished for immediate possession by a gentleman whom we met on the road down, and whose facility of execution in making crucified Christs out of plaster of Paris is something almost incredible. His type of face was Jewish, and it struck both Jones and me that his proficiency must be in some degree due to hereditary practice. He showed us one crucifix which he had only begun at eight o'clock that morning, and by eleven was as good as finished. He told us he had done the brand new Disputa chapel and the Agony in the Garden with the beautiful blue light thrown all over Christ through deep French ultramarine glass, and he was now going on with the other chapels as fast as he could. He said they had no oven for baking terra-cotta figures ; besides, terra-cotta was such a much slower material to work in ; he could make a gross of apostles in plaster more quickly than a single set of twelve in terra-cotta, and the effect was just as good when painted ; so plaster of Paris and unrivalled facility of execution are to have TABACHETTFS WORK AT CREA. 251 everything their own way. Already what I can only call a shoddy bishop or pope or two, I forget which, have got in among the circle of Tabachetti's saints and angels that still re- mains. These are many of them portraits full of serious dignity and unspotted by the world of barocco with which Tabachetti was surrounded. At the present moment they have been partly scraped and show as terra- cotta ; no doubt they have suffered not a little in the scraping and will do so still further when they are repainted, but there is no help for it. Great works of art have got to die like everything else. And, after all, it is as well they should, lest they come to weigh us down too heavily. Why should a man live too long after he is dead ? For a while, yes, if he has done good service in his generation, give him a new lease of life in the hearts and memories of his suc- cessors, but do not let even the most eminent be too exacting ; do not let them linger on as nonagenarians when their strength is now become but labour and sorrow. We have statutes of mortmain to restrain the dead hand from entering in among the living — why not a statute of limitations or '*a fixed period " as against reputations and works of art — say a 252 EX VOTO. thousand years or so — behind which time we will resolutely refuse to go, except in rare cases by acclamation of the civilised world ? How is it to end if we go on at our present rate, with huge geological formations of art and book middens accreting in every city of Europe ? Who is to see them, who even to catalogue them ? Remember the Malthusian doctrine, and that the mind breeds in even more rapid geometrical ratio than the body. With such a surfeit of art and science the mind palls and longs to be relieved from both. As the true life which a man lives is not in that consciousness in the midst of which the thing he calls ''himself sits and the din and roar of which confuse and deafen him, but in the life he lives in others, so the true life a man's work should live after his death is not in the mouths but in the lives of those that follow him ; in these it may live while the world lasts, as his lives who invented the wheel or arch, but let it live in the use which passeth all praise or thanks or even understanding, and let the story die after a certain time as all things else must do. Perhaps ; but at any rate let us give them decent burial. Crush the wounded beetle if you will, but do not try to mend it. I am glad TABACHETTPS WORK AT CREA. 253 to have seen the remains of the Assumption chapel while they are in their present state, ~ but am not sure whether I would not rather see them destroyed at once, than meet the fate of restoration that is in store for them. At the same time I am confident that no more competent restorer than the able and eminent sculptor who has the work in hand is at all likely to be found. My complaint is not against him, but against the utter hopelessness of the task. I would again urge those who may be induced to take an interest in Tabachetti's work to lose no time in going to see what still remains of it at Crea. Last January I paid a second visit to Crea; and finding a scaffolding up, was able to get on a level with the circle of full-length figures. • They were still unpainted, the terra-cotta figures showing as terra-cotta and the plaster of Paris white. When they are all repainted the visitor will find it less easy to say which are new figures and which old. I will therefore say that of the lower circle of twenty full-length figures the only two entirely new figures are the sixth to the left of the door on entering, which represents a man holding an open book by his left hand and resting it on his thigh, and the sixth figure to the right of the door on 254 E^ VOTO. entering. There are several unimportant re- storations of details of dress, feet, and clouds ; the rest of the work in this circle is all by Tabachetti. In the circle of busts and half-length figures, the first new work to the left of the door on entering is a figure that holds a lamb, the two half-length figures that come next in sequence are also new — the second of these is a nun holding a little temple. The second upper choir of angels and saints is still in its original [i^] colour and seems to have been little touched, as also the pendant. The chapel containing the Marriage Feast at Cana has been much restored and badly- repainted. Most of the figures are very poor, but some, and especially a waiter with his hair parted down the middle, who is offering a hare (not cut up) to a guest who seems to have had too much already, are very good indeed. I find it difficult to think that this waiter can be by any one but Tabachetti. The guitar-player is good, or rather was good before he was repainted — so is a lady near him, so are some of the waiters at the other end, and so are the bride aud bridegroom ; at any rate they are life-like and effective as seen from outside, but the chapel has suffered much from restoration. TABACHETTFS WORK AT CREA. 255 There is one other chapel at Crea which may be by Tabachetti though I do not know that it is ascribed to him, I mean the one containing figures of the founder and his wife, a little below the main piazza. The shepherds and sheep to the left are probably not by Tabachetti, but the lady is a well-modelled figure. Both she, how- ever, and her husband have been so cruelly clogged with new paint that it is hard to form an opinion about them. On the piazza itself is a chapel representing the Birth of the Virgin which is also pleasing. It is not always easy for us English to tell the Birth of the Virgin from the Nativity, and it may help the reader to distinguish these sub- jects readily if he will bear in mind, that at the Birth of the Virgin the baby is always going to be washed — which never happens at the Nativity ; this, and that the Virgin's mother is almost invariably to have an ^ggy and generally a good deal more, whereas the Virgin never has anything to eat or drink. The Virgin's mother always wants keeping up. Gaudenzio Ferrari has a Birth of the Virgin in the Church of S. Cristoforo at Vercelli. The Virgin's mother is eating one ^gg with a spoon, and there is another coming in on a tray, which I think is to be beaten up in wine. Something 256 EX VOTO. more substantial to follow is coming in on a hot plate with a cover over it and a napkin. The baby is to be washed of course, and the kind old head nurse is putting her hand in the bath, while the under nurse pours in the hot water, to make sure that the temperature is exactly right. It is to be just nicely loo-warm. The bath itself is certainly a very little one ; it will hold about a pint and a half, but medieval washing apparatus did run rather small, and Gaudenzio was not going to waste more of his precious space than he could help upon so uninteresting an object as a bath ; in actual life the bath was doubtless larger. The under- under nurse is warming a towel, which will be nicely ready when the bath is over. Joachim appears to have been in very easy circumstances, and the arrangements could hardly be more commodious even though the event had taken place at a certain well-known establishment in the Marylebone Road. At Milan, in a work that I only know by Pianazzi's engraving, there are two eggs coming in on a tray, and they too, I should say, are to be beaten up in wine. The under nurse is again filling a very little bath with warm water, and the head nurse is trying the temperature with her hand. There is no room for the warming TABACHETTFS WORK AT CREA. 2 si of the towel, but there is no question that the towel is being warmed just out of- the picture on the left hand. Here, at Crea, the attendant is giving the Virgin's mother a plain boiled egg, and has a spoon in her hand with which she is going to crack it. The Virgin's mother is frowning and motioning it away ; she is quite as well as can be expected ; still she does not feel equal to taking solid food, and the nurse is saying, '* Do try, ma am, just .one little spoonful, the doctor said you was to have it, ma am." In the smaller picture by Carpaccio at Bergamo she is again to have an egg ; in the larger she is to have some broth now, but a servant can be seen in the kitchen plucking a fowl for dear life, so probably the larger picture refers to a day or two later th^n the earlier. The only other thing that struck us at Crea was the Virgin in the Presentation chapel. She is so much too small ^riat one feels as though there must be some explanation that is not obvious. She is not more than 2 ft. 6 in. high, while the High Priest, and Joachim and St. Anne are all life-sized. The Chief Priest is holding up his hands, and seems a good deal surprised, as though he were saying — '' Well, my dear, I must say you are the very smallest Virgin that I ever had presented to me during 258 EX VOTO. the whole course of my incumbency." Joachim and St. Anne seem very much distressed, and Joachim appears to be saying, " It is not our fault ; I assure you, sir, we have done every- thing in our power. She has had plenty of nourishment." There must be some explana- tion of the diminutive size of the figure that is not apparent. ( 259 ) CHAPTER XVII. CONCLUSION. Returning to Varallo, in the town itself the most important work is the fresco by Gaudenzio Ferrari in the church of Sta. Maria delle Grazie, already several times referred to. The reader will find it fully described in the pages of Colombo ; moreover, in January last Signor Pizetta took excellent negatives of all the compartments into which the work is divided, and I learn that he has sent impressions — put together so as to give a very good idea of the work — to the Italian Exhibition that will open as these pages leave my hands. I have myself also sent to the same Exhibition a few unreduced impressions from the negatives used in the illus- trations that face earlier pages : these will give the reader a more correct impression of the works from which they are taken than he can get from the reduction. I do not yet know whether they will be hung. » The fresco of Sta. Petronilla painted by Gau- 26o EX VOTO. denzio by moonlight on a chapel just outside the town, is now little more than a wreck. There are a few works by Gaudenzio of no great importance in the Pinacoteca of the Museum ; a few frescoes by Lanini, one or two drawings by Tanzio D'Enrico, which show that he was a well-trained draughtsman ; two pictures by him, barocco in character, but not without power, and other works of more or less interest, are also In the Pinacoteca. In the parish church of S. Gaudenzio, behind the altar, there is an exceedingly fine Ancona by Gaudenzio, to which I have already referred. Over an altar in the north transept, but for the most part hidden behind a painted tela, is Tabachetti's very beautiful Madonna del Rosario, which the visitor should ask the Sacristan to show him ; and last, but hardly least, there is a Madonna by Dedomenici of Rossa — a village higher up the Valsesia — painted on linen, in the chapel dedicated to St. Joseph. I referred to this last-named work in my book ** Alps and Sanctuaries" (pp. 177, &c.), and have seen no reason to modify the opinion I then expressed. I may repeat that about twenty years ago • I was much struck with the painting and could not make out its strong CONCLUSION. 261 and evidently unaffected medieval feeling, yet modernness at the same time. On consult- ing the Sacristan I learned that Dedomenici had died about 1840. He added that the extraordinary thing was that Dedomenici had never studied painting, and had never travelled out of the Valsesia ; that he had, in fact, acquired his art by doing rather than by learn- ing how to do. This, as it appeared to me, explained his excellence. As a general rule the more people study how to do things the more hopelessly academic they become. Learning how to say ends soon in having nothing to say. Learning how to paint, in having nothing that one so longs to paint as to be unable to keep one's hands off it. It gratifies the lust of doing suffi- ciently to appease it, and then kills it. Learn- ing how to write music, ends in the dreary symphonies, operas, cantatas, and oratorios which it seems are all that modern composers can give us. The only way to study an art is to begin at once with doing something that one wants very badly to do, and doing it — even though it be only very badly. Study, of course, but synchronously — letting the work be its own exercises. If a man defers doing till he knows how to 262 EX VOTO. do, when is the hunting the ignis fatuus of a perfect manner to end, and the actual work that he is to leave behind him to begin? I know nothing so deadening, as a long course of preliminary study in any art, and nothing so living as work plunged into at once by one who is studying hard — over it, rather than in preparation for it. Jones talking with me once on this subject, and about agape as against gnosis in art, said, ** Oh that men should put an enemy into their brains to steal away their hearts." At any rate he and I have written '* Narcissus'' on these principles, and are not without hope that what it has lost in erudition it may have gained, in freshness. I have, however, dealt with the question of how to study painting more at length in the chapter on the Decline of Italian art in ''Alps and Sanctuaries." I said I would return to the chapel of Loreto a little way out of Varallo on the road to Novara. This work has a lunette which is generally, and I suppose correctly, ascribed to Gaudenzio. It is covered with frescoes not of extraordinary merit, but still interesting, and the chapel Itself is extremely beautiful. I had intended dwelling upon it at greater length, but find that my space will not allow me to do CONCLUSION. 263 SO, though I shall hope to describe it more fully in another work on Italy, for which I have many notes that I have been unable to use here. And now to conclude. A friend once said to me on the Sacro Monte, *' How is it that they have no chapel of the Descent of the Holy Spirit ?" I answered that the work of Gaudenzio Ferrari, Tabachetti, D' Enrico, and Paracca was a more potent witness to, and fitter temple for, the Holy Spirit, than any that the hands even of these men could have made for it expressly. For that there is a Holy Spirit, and that it does descend on those that diligently seek it, who can for a moment question ? A man may speak lightly of the Father and it shall be forgiven him ; he may speak lightly of the Son and it shall be forgiven him ; but woe to him if he speak lightly of that Divine Spirit, inspiration of which alone it is that makes a work of art either true or permanently desirable. Of the letter in which the Sacro Monte is written, I have at times in the preceding pages spoken lightly enough. Who in these days but the advocates whose paid profession it is to maintain the existing order, and those whom custom and vested interests hold enthralled. 264 EX VOTO. accepts the letter of Christianity more than he accepts the letter of Oriental exaggerated phraseology ? If three days and three nights means in reality only thirty-six hours, so should full fifty per cent, be deducted wherever else seems necessary, and ^Mead" be read as ''very nearly dead," and *' the Son of God " as '^ rarely perfect man." Who, on the other hand, that need be reckoned with, denies the eternal underlying verity that there is an omnipresent unknown something for which Mind, Spirit, or God, is, as Professor Mivart has well said, '' the least misleading " expression ? Who doubts that this Mind or God is immanent throughout the whole universe, sustaining it, guiding it, living in it, he in it and it in him ? I heard of one not long since who said he had been an atheist this ten years — and added, '' thank God." Who, again, doubts that the spirit of self-sacri- fice for a noble end is lovelier and brings more peace at the last than one of self-seeking and self-indulgence ? And who doubts that of the ^two great enemies both to religion and science referred to in the passage I have taken for my motto, *' the too much " is even more dangerous than ''the too little"? I, and those who think as I do, would see the letter whether of science or of Christianity made CONCLUSION. 265 less of, and the spirit more. Slowly, but very slowly — far, as it seems to our impatience, too slowly — things move in this direction. See how even the Church of Rome, and indeed all churches, are dropping miracles that they once held proper objects of faith and adoration. The Sacro Monte is now singularly free from all that we Protestants are apt to call superstition. The miracles and graces so freely dealt in by Fassola and Torrotti find no place in the more recent handbooks. The Ex Votos and images in wax and silver with which each chapel formerly abounded have long disappeared, and the sacred drama is told with almost as close an adherence to the facts recorded in the Gospels, as though the whole had been done by Pro- testant workmen. Where is the impress of Christ's footprint now ? carted away or thrown into a lumber room as a child's toy that has been outgrown — so surely as has been often said do the famous words ^' E pur si muove^^ ^PP^Y to the Church herself, as well as to that world whose movement she so strenuously denied. The same thing is happening here among ourselves. As the good churchmen at Varallo have thrown away their Flemish dancer, their footprint of the Saviour, and their Virgins that box thieves' ears and persist in turning round 266 EX VOTO. and smiling even after they have been asked not to do so, so we, by the mouths of our Bishops, are flinging away our Genesis, our Exodus, and I know not how much more. .In the Nineteenth Century for last December the Bishop of Carlisle says that the account of Creation given in the Book of Genesis **does not pretend to be historical in any ordinary sense " — or, in other words, that it does not pretend to be historical, or true, at all. Surely this is rather a startling jettison. The Bishop goes on to say that '' the account of the flood is a very precious tradition full of valuable teach- ing/' and is, he doubts not, a record of some great event that actually occurred ; '' but," he continues, " I confess that until Bishop Colenso brought his arithmetic to bear upon it and some other portions of Old Testament history, I was quite [why '* quite ?"] under the impres- sion that the common sense of Christians abstained from criticising this ancient record by the canons applicable to ordinary history." This was not my own impression, but the Bishop's is doubtless more accurate. If things, however, go on at this rate, a hundred years hence we shall have a Bishop writing to the Twentieth Century that till X, Y or Z brought their canons of historical criticism to bear on CONCLUSION, 267 the Resurrection itself, he was '' quite " under the impression that the common sense of Christians abstained from criticising this ancient record by the canons applicable to ordinary history. The Bishop appeals, and rightly, to common sense. This is of all courts the safest and rightest to abide by, but it must not be forgotten that the common sense of one generation is not that of the next, and that the modification with which common sense descends cannot be effected, however gently we may try to do so, without some disturbance of the pre-existing common sense, and some reversal of its decrees. That the letter of the coming faith will be greatly truer than that of the many that have preceded it I for one do not believe. Let us have no more '^ Lo heres" and '* Lo theres" in this respect. I would as soon have a winking Madonna or a forged decretal, as the doubtful experiments or garbled articles which the high priests of modern science are applauded with one voice for trying to palm off upon their devotees ; and I should look as hopefully for good result from a new monastery, as from a new school of art, college of music, or scientific institution. Whatever faith or science the world at large bows down to will in its letter be tainted 2 68 EX VOTO. with the world that worships it. Whoever clings to the spirit that underlies all the science obtaining among civilised peoples will assuredly find that he cannot serve God and Mammon. The true Christ ever brings a sword on earth as well as peace, and if he maketh men to be of one mind in an house, he divideth a house no less surely. The way will be straight in the future as in the past. All that can be hoped for is that it may perhaps become a trifle more easy through the work of the just men made perfect through suffering that have gone before, and that he who in bygone ages would have been burnt will now be only scouted. I have in the last few foregoing pages been trenching on somewhat dangerous ground, but who can leave such a work as the Sacro Monte without being led to trench on this ground, and who that trenches upon it can fail to better understand the lesson of the Sacro Monte itself ? I am aware, however, that I have said enough if not too much, and will return to the note struck at the beginning of my work — namely, that I have endeavoured to stimulate study of the great works on the Sacro Monte rather than to write the full account of them which their importance merits. At the same time I must admit that I have had great advan- CONCLUSION. 269 tages. Not one single previous writer had ever seen an earlier work than that of Fassola, published in 1670 [i], whereas I have had before me one that appeared in 1586 [7]. I had written the greater part of my book before last Christmas, and going out to Varallo at the end of December to verify and reconsider it on the spot, found myself forced over and over again to alter what I had written, in consequence of the new light given me by the 1586 [7] and 1590 [i] editions of Caccia. It is with pro- found regret that though I have continued to search for the 1565 and 1576 editions up to the very last moment that these sheets leave my hands, my search has been fruitless. Over and above the advantage of having had even the later Caccia before me, I have seen Cav. Aless. Godio's '' Cronaca di Crea/' which no previous writer had done, inasmuch as this work has been only very lately published. Moreover, when I was at Varallo, it being known that I was writing on the Sacro Monte, every one helped me, and so many gave me such important and interesting information that I found my labour a very light and pleasant one. Especially must I acknowledge my profound obligations to Signor Dionigi Negri, town clerk of Varallo, to Signor Galloni the present director 2 70 EX VOTO. of the Sacro Monte, to Cav. Prof. Antonini and his son, Signori Arienta and Tonetti, and to many other kind friends whom if I were to begin to name I must name half the town of Varallo. With such advantages I am well aware that the work should be greatly better than it is; if, however, it shall prove that I have succeeded in calling the attention of abler writers to Varallo, and if these find the present work of any, however small, assistance to them, I shall hold that I have been justified in publishing it. In the full hope that this may turn out to be the case, I now leave the book to the generous consideration and forbearance of the reader. INDEX. Academicism, its deadening influ- ence, 261 Academy Exhibition, he had better stick to, 76 Action, violent, difficulty of render- ing in sculpture, 81 Adam and Eve, their transformation into Roman soldiers, 61 the old chapel on site of pre- sent Crowning with Thorns, 120, 184 the figures how transformed, 120, 121 Advocates, who but the, whose paid profession, &c., 263 Agape, the soul of true art, 8 and gnosis in art, 262 Alagna, the brothers D'Enrico came from, 105 Albertino, Giambattista, inventory, 3 Animals, better in the Temptation than in the Adam and Eve chapel, 119 Annunciation, Miraculous Madonna in this chapel, 127 Antonini, Cav. Prof., 103, 121, 122, 167, 190, 215, 216, 218, 220, 270 Arienta, G., 11, 12, 14, 54, 92, 120, 134, 149, 150, 184, 226, 270 Arona, G. Ferrari's ancona at, 93 Art, Agape not gnosis the soul of, 8, 262 generally either growing or declining, 219 the kingdom of, full of mis- carriages, 248 great works of must die, 251 a statute of mortmain wanted for, 252 the only way to study an, 261 Ascension, early chapel of the, and wooden figure over fountain, 54 - and present Temptation chapel, 54 Asymptotes, Right and Truth are as, 249 Atheist, " I've been a, thank God," 264 Automatic arrangement for buying candles, 231 Background, fresco, not part of the initial scheme, 57, but gra- dually evolved, 58 generally made to the terra- cotta figures, not vice versd, 178 Bacon, the grossest of impostors, 249 Baked, the figures were, down in the town, 191 Bankruptcy, in view of admitted, we accept convention, 82 Bargnola, of Valsolda, or Paracca, 144, &c. {See Preface.) Bartoli on Tabachetti, 100 Baton, how I asked for Cagnoni's, 237 Battista, Custode, at Sacro Monte, 164 Battle, a, near Borgo Sesia, 29 BeUini, portraits of Gio. and Gen- tile, 7 Gio. stands higher than Gaud, Ferrari, 20 Bernardino de' Conti, his drawing of Stefano Scotto, 205 Birdlime, boys steal the coppers with, 125 Birth of the Virgin, and the Nati- vity, 255 Blenheim, the Raphael, 5 Boccioloni, C., Sindaco of Varallo, 209 Bodley, Thomas, and Haydocke's translation of Lomazzo, 21 Book, treating a mountain like a, 70 Books, post-dating late autumn, 2, 45, 178, 179 272 INDEX. Book-middens, huge geological for- mations of, &c. , 252 Borromeo, S. Carlo, his first visit to Varallo, 64 second founder of the Sacro Monte, 64 second visit to Varallo, 65 death announced by an angel, 65 Box on the ear, given to a thief by the Virgin, 127 Burlazzi, Prof., 75, ^6, 119 CacciA — his work on the Sacro Monte, I, 2 the various editions of, 45, 61, 63 Cagnoni's Mass for the quatercen- tenary of Gaudenzio Ferrari, 237 Caimi, B., inscription on his grave, 12, 44 conveyances to, 11, 12, 40, &c. arrives at Varallo, 41 Candles, automatic ar.angement for buying, 231 Capture chapel, the original, where placed, 130 the old, date of the change from, 168 Carestia, Ab. Cav. , of Riva Valdob- bia, 45 Carlisle, the Bishop of, his somewhat startling jettison, 266 Casale, Pietro, waiter at Rosa Rossa, 33. 240 Centesimo, one on floor of Ecce Homo chapel, 125 Ceriani, Sac. Ant., 2 Character, towns an expression of, 39 Children, to, all great things hap- pened long ago, 83 Christ, figures perhaps originally intended for, 171, 172 portrait of, 179, 180 Christ's face, said to become smaller and smaller, 178 Christie, old, the model, 206 Cicognara, does not mention Taba- chetti, G. Ferrari, D'Enrico, nor any Valsesian sculpture, 99 Ciocc' ancK anc'uei, 173 Cities express character, 39 Cocks, challenging cocks on cruci- fixes, 174 Colma, the, "root" over, 32 like "Verdi Prati," 34 Colombo, his life of Gaudenzio Fer- rari, 90, &c., dindpassifn Common sense, the rightest court to appeal to, 267 descends with modification, 267 Consciousness, the din and roar of our, deafens us, 252 Convention, must early supersede adherence to nature, 82 Conveyances to the ' ' Minori osser- vanti" of Dec. 21, i486, and April 14, 1493, II, 12, 42 Coppers on floors of chapels, boys stgal the, 125 Corelli, Anangelo, 219 Coronet ed altri instromenti, &c., 118 Le adoperano per pregare, 118 Costume, modern, why impossible, in an Epic work, 83, 85 Council of bishops held in the Val Rassa, 27 Courts, " a day in thy," &c., 231 Crea, 239, &c. Crib, cabin, and confine ideas with- in the limits, &c., 247 Cross on the Strada delta Madonna ^ 115 Crowning with Thorns chapel has a few waxen images, 124 Crucifixions, ' ' and there have been in both," 49 Cultivated eye, 5, 6 Culture, art tips from our leading journals of, 78 Dancer, Flemish, miracle of the, 185 Darwin, C, Boehm's statue of, 159 Dead, the reputations of the great, 249 Death, and sleep easy to render, 130 Declining, or growing, all arts are generally, 219 Dedomenici, da Rossa, his tela in the church of S. Gaudenzio, 260 D'Enrico, G., designer of many of the present chapels, 66, '67 challenges a comparison with Tabachetti that he will not bear, 73 his Nailing to Cross, and Taba- chetti's Calvary, 81 and Giacomo Ferro, and supers, 87, 88 not known to have studied under Tabachetti, 107 proc^s-verbal showing his rate of payment, 109, no ; died un- married, no shows his figures off, 114 INDEX. 273 D'Enrico, Antonio, 106 Melchiorre, 106 Devil, the, has the run even of the holy places of art, &c., 248 Die, great works of art must, 251 Dinant, Tabachetti came from, 104 Domenichino, had a long triumph, 249 Donoghue, F. M., 100 JScce Homo chapel, one centesimo left on floor of, 125 Egg, the general who was eating an, 29, 30 the Virgin's mother is always to have an, 255-257 Emigrators, the Valsesians great, 29 Endemic, art, more in eastern than western Italy, 38, &c. Entombment chapel, no fresco back- ground to, 57 Eusebius, St., his martyrdom, by Tabachetti, 243, &c. E-whew, 220 Execution near Loreto. 35 Eyck, John Van, and " fuit hie" 234, 235 Face, Christ's said to become smaller and smaller, 178 Farinetti, Cav. Don, 105 Fassola di S. Maiolo, Count, his child carried off by a wolf, 28 Count Gio. Bat. di S. Maiolo, account of, 44, &c. his work post-dated by a year, 45 Ferrari, Gaudenzio, his original journey to Calvary chapel, 13, 14 Raphael's superior, 15 never studied under Raphael, IS his devils not satisfactory, 16 not wholly free from man- nerism, 20 Lanzi on, 17, 18 Lomazzo, on, 18-21 said all painters were fond of stealing, 20 greater than Bern. Luini, but below G. Bellini, Giotto, and Giorgione, 20 his works in and about the S. Francesco chapel, 58, 59 his Crucifixion chapel, scrawls on the frescoes, 59, 60 probably developed the concep- tion of the Sacro Monte scheme, 70 Ferrari, Gaudenzio, his Crucifixion the most daringly ambitious work, &c., 77 what was good enough for him is so for us, 79 his life and principal works, 90, &c. — — his Crucifixion chapel, date of, 94 probable return to Varallo, 97 violent dissensions between the town and Sacro Monte, 97 -- — sold his house and left Varallo for Milan, 98 Signor Morelli on, 98 is what Raphael is said to be, 98 • like Gio. Belhni, a steady grower, 133 • the only man who combined painting and sculpture in one design, 178 ■ his portraits of Stefano Scotto, and of Leonardo da Vinci, 189, 204 "^ his Crucifixion chapel the most daring among Itahan works of art, 197 the same but stronger, 212 had a tendency to get his figures below life size, 212 has not suffered much from repainting, 228 the quatercentenary of his birth, and Cagnoni's mass, 237 Margherita, 93, 96 Gerolamo, 93, 96 his death, 97 Ferro, Giacomo, G. D' Enrico's assis- tant, 67 and D'Enrico, and supers, 88 D' Enrico's partner and heir, 107-112 Fiamenghino, II, and Rovere, or Rossetti, 149, &c. Fifty per cent, to bp deducted from many Oriental expressions, 264 Figures, many transformed and shifted, 61 Five, four often taken for, in old writing, 53 Flemish dancer, miracle of the, 185 Footprint, impression of Christ's, 222 where is Christ's now ? 265 Forged decretal, a, 267 Fortresses, spiritual frontier, 52 Four, five often taken for, in old writing, 53 Fresco at Mantegna (Virgin and married couple), 36 S 274 INDEX Fresco, St. Abbondio at Como, (striped counterpane), 36 St. Mark's at Varallo (cow pinning a wolf), 36 background, not part of the initial scheme, 57 outside original Entombment chapel, 57, 58 the, began outside the chapels, 70 ■ generally done after the sculp- tured work, not before, 178 •' Fuit hie," examples of the use of this form, 234, 235 Furnace, the, where the figures were baked, 191 Gable, stepped, house with a, in fresco background, 162 Galloni, P., his ' Uomini e Fatti,' 3, II, 40, 44, 45, 47. 52. 53, 54, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 269 Garbled article, a, 267 German not spoken lower down the valley formerly than now, 30 blood and language in the Val Sesia, 51 Giotto and Giorgione, 20 Giussano, his account of S. Carlo at Varallo, 64 Gnosis, not, but agape, the soul of true art, 8, 262 Godio, Cav. Ales., his Cronaca di Crea, 104, 269 Gogin, C, 177 Grazie, Fassola on, 123 Gross, he could make a gross of Apostles, 250 Grosvenor Exhibition, he had better stick to, 76 Growing, or declining, all arts are generally, 219 Guercino had a long triumph, but has fallen, 249 Guido had a long triumph, 249 Hamlet, if the part is totally excised, 81 Handel, "Verdi Prati" like the Colma, 35 said the last word in music, 220 Harlech, extract from visitors' book, ,33. 34 Haydocke, Rich., his translation of Lomazzo dedicated to Bodley, 21 Hieroglyphics, two in the Massacre chapel, 151 Holy Sepulchre, stone resembling the one that covered the, 43, 232 Holy Spirit, no chapel of Descent of the, 263 woe to him who speaks lightly of the, 263 Horse-hair on the figures, 13, 75 Horses valued at three figures, 109 Cesare Maggi's horse genu- flecting, 117 Hystero-epilepsy, figure of boy in fit of, 160 Idealism, time and incompetency alike turn realism into, 83, 85, 86 Incompetence, saved early masters from a good deal, 85, 86 Indefiniteness, ideas that are only tolerable when left in, &c., 247 Innocent X., and miracle in Nativity chapel, 140 Inventory, Albertino's, 3 Irony, quiet, of the Psalmist, 231 Irving, even though the Hamlet be, 81 Jerusalem, resemblances to Var- allo, 26, 49 Jones, H. Festing, on the crying of Gaudenzio's angels, 16 and chip from cross, on ascent of Sacro Monte, 115 his songs exceedingly fine, 219 "Oh, that men should put an enemy," &c., 262 King, the Rev. S. W., his " Italian Valleys," &c., 10 does not mention Tabachetti, 17, 99 Kugler, Sir A. H. Layard s edition of, 4-9 Lanini, frescoes in the Cena chapel, now destroyed, 162 frescoes by, in old Capture chapel, 169 Lanzi on G. Ferrari, 17, 18 Layard. Sir A. H., thinks Taba- chetti was a painter and deco- rator, 4 his edition of Kugler, 4-9 calls the figures of the Sacro Monte repugnant to a "culti- vated eye," 5 and portraits of Giovanni and Gentile Bellini, 7 on " excellence in art," 8 Leonardo da Vinci, Gaudenzio Fer- rari's portrait of, 207-209 Gaudenzio did not like him, 208 INDEX. 275 " Lo heres," let us have no more, 267 " Lord," all true art must be done " to the," 9 Loreto, the Madonna of, 35, 262 Losers of anything, and Flight into Egypt chapel, 143 Liibke does not mention Tabachetti, nor any Valsesian sculpture, 99 Luini, Bernardino, not much below Gaudenzio Ferrari, 99 Luini, the Varallese painter of this name, 36, 37 Madama Reale, and the battle of Borgosesia, 30 Madonna Strada delta, 114 — — cross on the, 115 Maggi, Cesare, his horse genuflect- ing, 117 Magi chapel, interception of funds, 13s Mantegna, fresco at, apparition of Virgin to a 'gentleman and lady, 35, 36 Margate, Varallo like, 31 Marylebone Road, Queen Charlotte lying-in hospital in the, 256 Melchizedek, the Vecchietto a, 74 Michael Angelo, over subtle, 72 not so good a man all round as Tabachetti, 72, 73, 81 Middens, huge geological forma- tions of art and book, 252 Miel, Giovanni, never worked on the Sacro Monte, 5 how mistaken for Rovere, 150 Miracle of the Virgin boxing the thief's ears, 127 of the young man who was carrying a treasure to Varallo, 127, 128 in the Nativity chapel on ele- vation of Innocent X., 140 of the Flemish dancer, 185 Miracles disappearing slowly but surely even from the Church of Rome, 265 Modern costumes, why always im- possible in an epic work, 83 all become ultimately interest- ing, 85 Monmouth and Macedon not more like than Jerusalem andVarallo, 49 Montrigone, D'Enrico and Ferro's work at, 106, 107 Mountain, taking a, and illustrat- ing, 70 Much, the too, 264 Museum at Varallo, old votive pic- tures in the, 124 Nagler on Tabachetti, 100, loi " Narcissus," Jones's and my ora- torio, 262 Nativity and birth of the Virgin, 255 Negri, Dionigi, 215, 269 Nest-eggs, a few coppers left on the ground as, 125 Nisus, there is a, in the right direc- tion, 249 ol'ot vitv ^pbroL etcLy 2>'^ Oriental, * ' more than he accepts the letter of Oriental exaggera- tion," 264 Orta, Sacro Monte 'at, not good, 71, 72 people judge Varallo by, 71' Outside the chapels, frescoes began, 70 Painting and sculpture, turning on the full strength of both, 69, 77 integral parts of one design, 79 Panesia, the blessed Virgin, 27 Paracca, orBargnola, 145. {See Pre- face, ) Passero solitario, the, 42 Pellegrini, called Tibaldi, his plan of the Sacro Monte, 2, 3 his intended reconstruction of the Sacro Monte, 66 Perkins does not mention Taba, chetti, nor any Valsesian sculp- ture, 99 Pickle the spirit, &c., 211 Pietro, the waiter at Rosa Rossa, 33 Pilato, Palazzo di, probably de- signed by G. D'Enrico, 66, 67 Pin, with a brush like the point of a, 85 . Pit, these pieces were being played to the, 84 Pizetta, '' questo non sacrifica^'' 112, 160 his photographs of the Sta. Maria delle Grazie frescoes, 259 Plaster of Paris, an apostle of, 250 Poetry better than prose, because less of it in a page, 63 Portraiture, why impossible on a large scale on Sacro Monte, 89 Post-dating late autumn books, 2," 45, 178, 179 Potter, the late F. H., 248 Pray, " do the English ever?" 118 Prince of painters, no one the, 98 276 INDEX. Procts-verbal^ showing the rate at which the sculptors were paid, 109, 110 Prose, its disadvantage as compared with poetry, 63 Providing Providence with an abode, 41 Psalmist, quiet irony of the, 231 Purcell, Henry, 219 Raphael, Blenheim, the, 5 Gaudenzio never studied under, IS Gaudenzio his superior, 15 will not stand comparison with Gaudenzio Ferrari, 98 will ere long come down, 249 Real drapery always means that the figure has been cut about, 120 Realism in great measure impossible for Sacro Monte artists, 83, 85, 86 we accept it with avidity when we can get it, 88 Reformation, the, and Sacro Monte, SO stamped out in many subal- pine valleys, but not in all, 50 Reputations of the great dead, 249 Rocks rarely well done by early masters, 136 Gaudenzio Ferrari's, 136 '* Root," a remarkable, 32 Rosa Rossa, hotel at Casale, 33, 240 Rossetti, M. Ang., and the Massacre chapel, 145. [See Preface. ) Rossetti, or Rovere, the brothers, 149, &c. Rossi, Joseph, waiter, 33 Rovere, or Rossetti, the brothers, 149 Sacrifica, quesio niente, 112 . Sacro Monte, works on, begun sooner than the received date, 12 miracles preceding its founda- tion, 41, 42, 48 the, intended as a spiritual frontier fortress, 50 history, two main periods, 52 chapel No. 45 the earliest building on the, 53 several early chapels now un- discoverable, 54-56 chapels completed by 1550-86, 61, 62 Leonardo da Vinci possibly consulted about the, 69 • violent dissensions between ecclesiastics and the town of Var- allo, 97 Procks-verbal, showing ral^e at which the sculptors were paid, 109, 110 smaller entrance to, 117 Signor Topini's inn, 117 Scotto, Stefano, his portrait, 91, 189, 204 Sculpture and painting, turning on full strength of both, &c., 69 integral parts of one design, 77^ 79 the, at Varallo, would look cold and uninteresting without its colour and background, 201 Shoddy, a, bishop or two, 251 Sleep and death, easy to render, 130 Stagey, the Varallo chapels in one way are, but it is surprising how little, 87 Stella, Fermo, not, probably, a pupil of Gaudenzio, 15 Stepped gable, house with a, on fresco background, 162 Stone, resembling that which covered the Holy Sepulchre, 43, 231 Strada, della Madon?ia, 114 Cross on the, 115 Stuffed piece, treating nature as a, 8S Supers, their legitimate function, 87 TabACHETTI, his name Tabaquet, and he was a Fleming, 5 never even mentioned by the Rev. S. W. King, 17 his "Journey to Calvary," the most astounding work in sculp- ture, 72, 197 a better man, take him all round, than Michael Angelo, 72, 73. 81 the strongest and most robust of the Sacro Monte artists, 78 his " Journey to Calvary," and D' Enrico's ' ' Nailing to Cross," 81 realistic, whenever he could be so, 88 the Titan of terra-cotta, 100 came from Dinant in Belgium, lOI sketch of his life, 99, &c, his existence not known by Cicognara, Liibke, and Perkins, 99 Zani, Nagler, and Bartoli on, 100, 10 1 his insanity only temporary, 102, 128, 130 INDEX, 277 Tabachetti, his Vision of St. Joseph chapel subsequent to his supposed insanity, 103 has left descendants near Crea, 103 Madonna del Rosario, and head in Museum, at Varallo, 103 summoned to Crea in 1590-91, 103 was buying property about Serralunga, 1600-1608, 102, 104 of noble birth, 104 his Adam and Eve chapel, 119 gave new heads to the Annun- ciation figures, 126 probably did the Flagellation and Crowning with Thorns cha- pels, 182-185 his Journey to Calvary chapel the most successfully ambitious work in medieval sculpture, 197 not a Donatello, 198 his " Vecchietto," 198 ■ his Countess of Serravalle, 199 his work at Crea, 239, &c. his Madonna del Rosario, 260 Taylor, Tom, " Oh, wretched," &'c., 32. 33 Temptation, the present chapel, early scrawls on, 54 Terra-cotta does not lend itself to decay, 137 Theory, early artists did not rise to, 85 Three days and three nights, if they mean only 36 hours, &c. , 264 Thrones valued at three figures, 109 Tibaldi, see Pellegrini. Time's glory," to set the seal," &c. (" Rape of Lucrece"), 83 Tonetti, 3, 90, 270 Too much, the, and the too little, 264 Topini, Signor, his inn on the Sacro Monte, 117 Torrotti, extract from, 25, &c. rather a plagiarist, 47 Tract, a modern Italian, 127 Tunbridge Wells, Varallo like, 31 TurcOy t Turco lei f 118 Tussaud's, Madame, 78 Unfamiliar class of work, on criti- cising, 79 Valsesia, the, always quasi-inde- pendent, 27, 28 its people great emigrators, 29 — — character of inhabitants, and infusion of German blood, 51 lay out of the track of wars, 51 Valsolda, Paracca, or Bargnola, of, 145. \See Preface.) Varallo inns, 24 cHmate, 25 Torrotti on, 25 resemblances to Jerusalem, 26, 49 perhaps still more like Tun- bridge Wells, Bath, or Margate, 31 the most western city of Italy with an endemic art, 38 Varese, clever though stagey, 71 a beautiful lady at, 118 Vecchietto, a Melchizedek of a figure, 74 chapter on the, 214 Villains, the, of the piece, 83 Vinci, Leonardo da, possibly con- sulted about the Sacro Monte, 69 both painter and sculptor, 70 Vincius, Gaudenzio Ferrari signed himself, 91 Virgin, birth of the, and the Nati- vity, 255 you are the very smallest, 257 Visitors' book, extracts from, 33, 34 Votive pictures, old, in museum at Varallo, 123, 124 War, the Val Sesia generally ex- empt from, 51 Winking Madonna, I would as soon have a, 267 Wood never returned to when once terra-cotta had been adopted, 56 World, the, will taint all that it wor- ships, 268 Zani on Tabachetti, 100 on Paracca {alias Bargnola, alias **il Valsoldino," alias Bo- logna), 145 PRINTED BV BALLANTYNK, HANSON, AND CO. EDINBURGH AND LONDON. RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY University of California Richmond Field Station, BIdg. 400 1301 South 46th Street Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS To renew or recharge your library materials, you may contact NRLF 4 days prior to due date at (510) 642-6233 DUE AS STAMPED BELOW MAY 1 6 2008 DD20 12M 7-06 334323 \ I UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY