DISCOURSE 
 
 LOE ATS'D SEEA^CES 
 
 PROFESSOR MOSES STUART; 
 
 DELIVERED IN THE 
 
 CITY OF NEW-YORK: 
 
 SABBATH EYEXIXG, JAXUARY 25, 1852. 
 
 WILLIAM ADAMS, 
 
 PASTOR OF THE CEXTEAL PKESBYTEEIAN CHUIICII. 
 
 NEW- YORK : 
 
 JOny F. TROW, PRIXTEIl, 49 AXX-STREET. 
 
 1S52.
 
 The cireunastances in which this discoui'se Avas propared, are best 
 ex})lained bj tlie following resolutions, adopted lYth January, 1852, at 
 the weekly meeting of an association of more than thirty clergymen, 
 Professors in the Union Theological Seminary, Pastoi's of Cliurches, 
 Secretaries of Religious Societies, and others ; which association 
 includes, in its past or present membei'ship, Avith the exception of 
 two or three, all the alumni of Andover in the cities of Xew-York, 
 Brooklyn, and AVilliamsburgh. For many years, Mr. vStuart had 
 been accustomed in his visits to the city to meet this circle of 
 brethren ; and ^'ery recently had been in affectionate coiTCspondence 
 with them in reference to matters of common interest. 
 
 Resolved, 1. That we have heard with profound sorrow, that the 
 Rev. Moses Stuart, Rrofessor of Sacred Litcature in the Andover 
 TJieological Seminary, is numbered no more with the li\-iiig ; and we 
 deem it fitting, in vit-w as well of his estimable and exalted character, 
 and tlu' prominent position he occupied in the religious world, as of 
 tile vari(^us intiniate and endearing relations many of us have sus- 
 tained to him, that we should take some special notice of his decease. 
 
 PiESoLVEi). 2. That in the death of Professor Stuart, the church 
 and the world luno sustained no ordinary loss. To a native sim- 
 plicitv. ardor, generosity, and transparency of character, he added, in 
 laru'c mt'asure. the K.iftier graces of the Christian, — a deep re\'erence, 
 especially, for the oracles of God, and a disposition to mau'nify, both 
 in doctrine and in life, the cross of Christ. In his early lal)0i's as a 
 pastor, he was eminently able, faithful, and successful ; as many seals 
 of \n> ministry, on earth and in heaven, bear witness. P)Ut it was in
 
 the chair of Sacred Literature that his chief work was done. Assum- 
 ing that chair at a time when the spirit of exegetical inquiry had 
 greatly declined, the dogmatical and metaphysical hue of study hav- 
 ing gained the preeminence, he devoted all the powers of his active, 
 acute, and discursive mind to the restoration of Avhat lie deemed the 
 true method of theological investigation. He resorted— not servilely, 
 but wth discrimination and independence of thought — to treasures of 
 hermeneutical lore which had before been generally unknown or neg- 
 lected ; and by the apparatus for study which his skill and patient 
 industry furnished, by his almost unequalled power of awakenino- en- 
 thusiasm in his pupils, and by his numerous published discussions, he 
 was mainly instrumental in giving a new direction and impulse to 
 Biblical study. Nor was he mei'ely a pioneer in this work — he main- 
 tained to the last the highest rank as a Biblical scholar ; and he lived 
 to see, in the extensive and earnest ciiltivation of exegetical science, 
 the ample fruit and rich reward of his well-directed and abundant 
 labors. Greatly indebted to him, also, is the cause of truth, for his 
 various candid and courteous, but powerful refutations of fundamental 
 error. Xor can we pass unnoticed his prompt and efficient ad\'ocacy 
 of all the great Christian reforms of the ago. By his many }iublished 
 works, he being dead yet speaketh ; and precious will be his memory 
 to all the students and lovers of the Sacred Volume, which his life so 
 cogently commended, and his learning so abundantly illustrated. 
 
 PiESOLVED, 3. That a committee be appointed, consisting of Rev. 
 Drs. Skinnei', Badger, and A. I). Smith, to prepare and forward, in 
 our name, a letter of condolence, accompanied with a copy of tliese 
 resolutions, to the widow and family of the deceased Professor. 
 
 PiKSOLVED, 4. That Rev. AYilliam Adams, D. \)., be rcqiiested to 
 deliver a discourse on the life and character of Professor Stuart, in the 
 Central Presbyterian Church, on Sabbatli evening, the 25lh inst., at 
 seven o'clock. 
 
 Rev. and Dear Brother : — At a meeting of the ministers of 
 the gospel, bv wliom von was reipiested to preach on tlie character 
 and labors of Professor Stuart of Andover, lately deceased, a resolu- 
 tion was pa-sed unanimously, that you Ijc rcijuested to fui'uish a co[w 
 of your sermon for publication.
 
 In tlie name of the moetiiig', dear brother, wc scn.l VdU tlii> )■( 
 quest. 
 
 Afteetionately and ^vith great res}iect, voids, 
 
 THOMAS II. SKIXXKU, 
 
 MILTOX IJAIX.EIt. 
 ASA D. SMITH, 
 
 March 15, 1852. 
 To the Uev. Dk. Adams. 
 
 Rev. Drs. Skixnek, Badger, and Smith. 
 
 Dear LiiKTiiRKX : — I lia\"e dt-layed a reply to your note request- 
 ing a copy of n)y <erin< lU on thi^ character and services of I'rofessor 
 Stuart, to tlie [iresent thne, because I have questioned, on many 
 grounds, the expediency of its publication ; especially aftt-r the exten- 
 sive circulation of the just and eloquent Funeral iJiscoui'se by Pro- 
 fessor I'ark. 
 
 I have, at length, however, concluded to publish it, as some ftiint 
 expression of the high regard in which Professor Stuart was held by 
 many at a distance from the scene of his life and death. 
 
 I wisli that the iJiscourse had been cast in a ditfii-rent form. Put 
 I give it precisely as it was originally delivered, without curtaihiK^nt 
 or adilition. 
 
 Very affectionately yours, 
 
 WILLIAM ADAMS. 
 
 New-York, April 80//;, 1852.
 
 DISCOUllSE. 
 
 iiEB. XI : 4. 
 — by it, he Loiug dead, yet speakctli, 
 
 The influeuce of 2:ood men is not coniined to the 
 times in wiiicli tliey live. It is not interred with 
 their bodies. This posthumous power is a most 
 hopeful and Ijeneficent element of society. Sad and 
 despondent are we when the " ancient and the hon- 
 orable, the wise man, and the counsellor" die. Die ? 
 They cannot die. The good which they have done 
 lives after them. Thousands of years after he had 
 fallen asleej:), Abel, the son of Adam, by his pious 
 example, was speaking to the world. The old pro- 
 phets are not dead. Tlie apostles have not perished. 
 The G'ood and truthful men who are now toilino: for 
 the world's advantage, are not so solitary and sin- 
 a'le-handed as their despondinii' thou£(ht mi^'ht suo-- 
 gest. The confessors, the scholars, the reformers 
 of past centuries still inhabit the world. Neither
 
 canvass, nor marble may have left one outline of 
 their forms and featm^es ; tlieir ashes may liave 
 been cast to tlie wind ; l^ut tlie invisible power of 
 tlieir tlionglits and actions, like tlie stars in tlieir 
 courses, exerts its strong; attraction over all tlie 
 thinking and acting of the world. The Apostle 
 seemed to exult in tliis consolation, as lie gathered 
 around him a great cloud of witnesses who had lived 
 centuries l^efore he was born. Still more populous 
 is the earth with good men now, than it was then. 
 " See, there are faces there. Some of them are 
 turned on us with a look surpassing earthly love. 
 The heavens have touched them. They are not 
 all strange to us. There is one ; and there. AVe 
 thought it dead ; but it lives ; and it shall live ;'"■'' 
 and when we stand by the grave where those we 
 have honored and loved are to ])e buried out of 
 sight, let this glorious truth Ije our consolation, 
 that being dead, they will still speak ; for goodness 
 is immortal. 
 
 There are many providential arrangements by 
 which the influence of good men is perpetuated. 
 The little defects or excrescences of personal charac- 
 ter, often exaggerated during life-time, as a screen 
 or obstacle to usefulness, are lost sight of after 
 death. There is no motive to remember them. 
 
 * R. H. Dana.
 
 Tliey drop off and are forgotten, save when preju- 
 dice, like an animal of prey, disturbs the grave for 
 some gloomy or ignominious purpose. Divested of 
 what is extrinsic and casual, the substantial (quali- 
 ties of the character alone remain ; and we ai-e left 
 to contemplate only the unmixed and invalualjle 
 service of a good life. Excellence, in the most 
 illustrious men who ever lived, has been lost 
 upon many of their contemporaries, by reason of 
 the adventitious circumstances to which they were 
 related ; which circumstances disappear in the pro- 
 gress of time, leaving their names the common 
 23roperty and boast of the world ; so that it is 
 only after translation that their fullest power is 
 disj^layed, as the arrow of Acestes Avas seen to 
 blaze when it passed into the heavens. Who 
 thinks, at this distance of time, of political or 
 denominational distinctions, at the mention of Me- 
 lancthon, Milton, Pascal, Butler, or Leighton i Pi'i- 
 vate differences and personal preferences have their 
 sway for a while, amid the collisions of life, Ijut, at 
 last, they are all forgotten in a general remem- 
 brance of goodness and greatness. The apostle 
 Paul must have had this very sentiment in mind, 
 when re1)uldng the Corinthians for their ^partialities 
 for particular men : " Let no man glory in men : for 
 all things are yours ; whether Paul, or Apollos, or
 
 10 
 
 Ceplias, all are yours," — a sentiment wliicli is sure 
 to prevail, wlien death, generous death, has set one 
 free from denominational i^rejudices, and his name 
 becomes apart of the intellectual wealth of the world. 
 No party, nor sect, nor nation can monopolize them. 
 
 The longevity of antediluvian patriarchs — a ne- 
 cessity of Providence in its time — is superseded by 
 better methods of transmitting influence. Men may 
 be excused from continuing long on the earth, now 
 that the results of their life may so soon be put upon 
 jiermanent record. A good book is a long, long life. 
 He is the true Methuselah whose pen transmits good 
 thoughts to posterity. His days are prolonged upon 
 the earth, and he will speak to millions who are yet 
 to be 1 )orn. The " ingenious dreamer " of Bedford 
 jail visits more families, instructs more minds, than he 
 could have done in person, had his mortal life been 
 protracted for centuries. Let not familiarity ^^ith the 
 wonder render us insensil)le to the Provide] itial gift, 
 which imparts uldquity and immortality to thought; 
 which renders it impossible that a good sentiment 
 should ever be lost l)y reason of the brief or obscure 
 life of its author ; which gives a good hymn to the 
 Church universal ; transmits the scholar's toil to the 
 end of time, and makes the inspiration of one the 
 teacher and the iuipnlse of the race. 
 
 The ])ersonal influence of soine men is to be
 
 11 
 
 measured by tlie many instrumentalities wliicli tliey 
 devise and put in operation ; tlieir own agency 
 meanwhile Ijeing purposely withdrawn fi-om sight, 
 and their chief endeavor being to stimulate the 
 actions of others. It is thus that teachers live in 
 their disciples ; and principles and habits are j^ro- 
 pagated by an instructor through many different 
 minds, till they have reached such a degree of 
 commonness and universality, that his own agency 
 is even undervalued or forgotten by those who are 
 not familiar with the beo'inniuo' as with the results of 
 things. It is frecpiently asked why the moral essays 
 of Addison and Johnson are not as much read and 
 highly valued now as formerly. Xot that their in- 
 trinsic value has diminished ; l)ut because the general 
 tone of intelligent society has been brought up to 
 their level, and is now aimins; at a higher c'rade. 
 To measure tlieir real worth, we must go back to 
 the times in which they lived, and mark how amidst 
 general dissoluteness, they struck a new key-note, 
 which in the suT)sequent combination of voices is lost 
 in the general harmony. The true greatness and 
 value of many lives is to be estimated by their suc- 
 cess in raising a profession or a community to a new 
 level, along the surface of which tlieir own greatness 
 is not discernible ; and it is only by travelling back 
 to the time and the place where their labors began,
 
 12 
 
 tliat we are capable of estimating tlie largeness of 
 their service. 
 
 These considerations are not inajipropriate to 
 the occasion which has hrouofht us to^'ether. ^Ve 
 are met, as ministers of religion, and students of 
 tlie Word of God, as pupils and as friends, to do 
 honor to one of the most illustrious names connect- 
 ed with the history of letters and relioion in our 
 country. He had, indeed, reached the allotted 
 period of human life. An enfeebled frame, and 
 an accumulation of those infirmities which beset 
 the life of a scholar, had prepared many of us to 
 expect at no distant time his departure ; l^ut when 
 the tidin2:s actually came that he was o-one, that 
 the form so f[imiliar to our memories would be 
 seen no more, that the lips from which we had 
 receiyed lessons of wisdom were sealed in death, 
 we felt something more than the pangs of personal 
 bereayement ; eyen despondent regret that a great 
 light had been extinguished, mingled with a strong 
 desire to make some befitting testimony to the dis- 
 tinguished services which he has rendered to his 
 country and the world. 
 
 We cannot reconcile it to our views of duty, 
 that such a man should pass from the earth, with- 
 out some mention of his claims upon puljlic grati- 
 tude and veneration. j\Elton was certainly rio-ht
 
 13 
 
 when lie com2:)lained, in Lis day, tliat the world 
 was perverse and wicked in the l)estowment of 
 its honors. The earth's conquerors and desti'03'ers 
 have been eulogized in history and in song, while 
 the noLler virtues of meekness, fortitude, and 
 patience in humble but useful toil, have passed 
 unapplauded. Specially meet has it been judged, 
 that here, in the heart of this commercial metro- 
 polis, amicl the bustle, the glare, and the pride of 
 life, that we should unite in honoring the memory 
 of one who, with talents which might have led to 
 luxury and display, borrowed no greatness from 
 office, or from wealth ; l)ut who, with nol)le mag- 
 nanimity, devoted a long life to the severities of 
 Christian scholarship. That life of study was not 
 wasted on idle theories and speculations. Great 
 respect, indeed, have we for purely intellectual 
 pursuits, even when their connection with material 
 interests is not obvious to a superficial observer : 
 for the spirit must claim its superiority to matter. 
 But the studies of our honored instructor and 
 friend were so rich in practical results — ^ results 
 which it was his reward to behold while upon 
 the earth, that his life disthictly marks a new 
 epoch in Biblical Literature, not only in this 
 country, Init throughout Anglo-Protestant Chris- 
 tendom. It is because of this that he deserves to
 
 14 
 
 be Honored in all suitable methods, as one of the 
 most distinguished men in the brief, but certainly 
 not barren history of our country. 
 
 The incidents in the life of a student are neces- 
 sarily few. — Moses Stuart was born of honest but 
 humble parentage, in Wilton, Conn., 2Gth March, 
 1780. At sixteen years of age he entered Yale 
 College, in the second year of the presidency of Dr. 
 Dwiirht, where he sustained the character of a 
 dilio'ent student and excellent scholar. Graduatino; 
 in 1799 with the highest honors of his class, he 
 taught an academy in Fairfield, Ijestowing some 
 attention at the same time on the study of the law. 
 In 1802, three years after his graduation, he was 
 chosen Tutor in Yale College, in which capacity he 
 served for two years. While a Tutor he entered 
 as a student of law in the office of Seth P. Staples, 
 Esq. Mr. Staples, at the jw'esent time a practi- 
 tioner of youthful vigor at the l)ar of our own 
 city, bears the following testimony to the character 
 of his distinguished ])upil. " Mr. Stuai't was a most 
 thorouixh, diligent, and successful student hi the 
 laAV ; and when he took his certificate for admis- 
 sion to the bar, I thought him as well cpialified as 
 any studeiit I ever had.^' To which honoral)le 
 testimony of his instractor, it may be added, as 
 many remeudjer, that tlie l)Ook to which Mr. Stuart
 
 15 
 
 often referred as liis favorite study, at tliis time, 
 was " I'^enie on Remainders," generally regarded, I 
 believe, as one of the most abstract and meta- 
 physical in the whole range of legal lore. Mr. 
 Stuart never opened an office for the prosecution 
 of his legal profession, but one case, in which he 
 was personally interested, is often cited in judicial 
 decisions. Warned to do military duty, a levy was 
 laid upon his pro2:)erty for failing to comply. Be- 
 lieving that he was exempt by a statute of limita- 
 tion, he carried the case before a judicial trdmnal, 
 where it was decided ac^ainst him. Resfardinc: the 
 principle involved — the relations of military to 
 civil jurisdiction — as very important, and per- 
 suaded of the justice of his position, he appealed 
 the case to the higher courts, where he was recti- 
 fied and vindicated by a reversal of the first deci- 
 sion. In subsequent life, Mr. Stuart was always 
 ready to testify to the great advantages he had 
 received from legal study as a very important part 
 of his intellectual discipline. Seriously impressed, 
 under the preaching of Dr. Dwight, with the im- 
 portance of personal religion, and experiencing a 
 decided chanii-e in his relii2:ious sentiments, his 
 preference was given to the Sacred Profession, and 
 after a comparatively l)rief season of preparation, 
 on the 5th of March, 1806, two years after resign-
 
 16 
 
 ing Ills office as Tutor, lie was ordained Pastor of 
 tlie Centre Cliurcli, in tlie city of Xew Haven. 
 The fervor, fidelity and success of liis career as a 
 Pastor are still matters of orrateful remenihrance 
 and distinct tradition. Distinf^iislied as is the 
 rejxitation which he suljseijuently acquired as a 
 scholar, there are many who think that his Lest 
 eftbrts were in the pulpit. The congregation over 
 which he was ordained, accustomed for a third of 
 a century to a style of discourse, clear, cold and 
 philosophic, which deserves to be designated as 
 " diplomatic vagueness," were startled from indif- 
 ference by the short, simjde, perspicuous sentences 
 of their new pastor, and more than all l)y the 
 unaffected earnestness and sincerity with which 
 they were delivered ; as the result of which, l)y the 
 blessing of God upon his labors, some two hundred 
 individuals were added to the Church under his 
 brief ministry of four years ; among whom was 
 the celebrated Xoah Webster, then in his hftieth 
 year, who, thirty-five years after, on his deathd_)ed, 
 (]Mr. Stuart Ijeing at the time on a visit to Xew 
 Haven) expressed to his former pastor the liveliest 
 gratitude for the fidelity of his early ministrations. 
 At the end of this time — in IS 10 — ^Mr. Stuart, 
 then thirty years of age, was aj)pointed to the 
 professorship of Sacred Literature in the newly
 
 11 
 
 organized Theological Seminary, at Andover, Mas- 
 sachusetts. 
 
 As it was in connection with that Seminary that 
 the remainder of Professor Stuart's life was spent — • 
 42 years — and its name is associated with many of 
 the results to which I am to refer, a Ijrief allusion to 
 its origin may not be considered impertinent. 
 
 Phillips Academy, at xVndover, one of the earliest 
 incorporated Academies in the country, was founded 
 m lYTS, and owes its origin to a young man only 21 
 years of age, whose name it bears, at whose solicita- 
 tions, it was lil)erally endowed by an affluent father 
 and uncle. While the course of study in this 
 Academy was remarkably high and liberal, its 
 ^\first and princijxd object was declared to be the 
 promotion of true piety and virtue." In the last tes- 
 tament of the Hon. John Phillips, one of its founders, 
 provision was made for the benefit of pious young 
 men studying 'for the Christian ministry, till such 
 time as a Professor of Divinity might he supported 
 in the Academy itself. In the year 1S<)T, the Trus- 
 tees of Phillips Academy petitioned tlie Legislature 
 for an increase of their incorporated rights, in order 
 to organize a distinct school for theological educa- 
 tion. An independent project for estaljlislnng a 
 Theological Seminary was then under discussion in 
 the same county, and by a happy combination of
 
 18 
 
 counsels and measures, tlie two were united; and 
 in 1808, tlie " Theological Seminary, in Phillips 
 Academy" at Andover, was fully organized. 
 
 An incorporated, endowed institution for theo- 
 logical education, on the same projection, did not 
 exist in the world before that time. Before tliis. 
 with the exception of the Theological Seminary 
 under the charge of the Rev. Dr. Mason, of Xew- 
 York, preparation for the ministry in tliis coun- 
 try, had been conducted under private tuition, and 
 in England was a mere appendage to an ordinary 
 University education. In England, at this very day, it 
 is customary in the education of the Dissenting clergy, 
 to embrace in one course, what in this country, is 
 divided into an academical, collegiate, and theo- 
 logical curriculum. The " Xew College," the consoli- 
 dated Dissenting Institution, opened in London, so 
 late as October last, at the head of which is Dr. Harris, 
 is organized on the plan of a mixed collegiate and 
 theological course. Mucli of the wisdom di-^played in 
 the organization of the Andover Theological Semi- 
 nary, as a distinct institution for tlieological training, 
 is due to the Rev. Eliphalet Pearson, LL. D., to 
 Avhose scholarship the country is largely indeljted, 
 Tlie first |)]'eceptor of Pliillips .Vcademy, for twenty 
 years, Profjs^-or of Hebrew and other Languages in 
 Harvard l^ni\"ersitv. he became the first Professor
 
 19 
 
 of Sacred Literature in the newly-organized Tlieolo- 
 gical Seminary. He continued in this office but a 
 single year, when Mr. Stuart was elected as his suc- 
 cessor. Though not one of its original founders, Pro- 
 fessor Stuart may be said to have been associated 
 with Andover Seminary from its organization. It was 
 not because of extraordinary proficiency in Orien- 
 tal languages that he was chosen to this office, for 
 his knowledge of Hebrew was at this time very 
 limited. Two years' preparation for the ministry, 
 and five years in the diligent prosecution of his pro- 
 fession, had not furnished large opportunities for 
 exact and extensive study. Choice was fixed upon 
 him, because of the general qualities which designa- 
 ted him as one able and wdllins: to furnish himself 
 for any station ; and upon that thorough qualification 
 he entered, with characteristic enthusiasm, imme- 
 diately upon his transfer to this new office. 
 
 Rightly to estimate the nature and extent of those 
 services, which he subsequently rendered to the 
 world, it will be necessary to take a survey of the 
 state of Biblical learning in this country, prior to 
 the time when his labors were commenced. 
 
 Many of the earliest ministers of the New Eng- 
 land colonies were men of extraordinary scholarship. 
 They had been trained at the Euglish universities, 
 and that at the golden age of Biblical learning. It
 
 20 
 
 would be difficult to designate in Englisli history, any 
 other time wlien such constellations of talent were 
 shining upon the eartli. Whatever was his opinion of 
 poetry and lighter literature, Cromwell, it must be 
 admitted, was an enthusiastic admirer and pati'on of 
 solid learning. 'Not to mention the names of Milton, 
 Locke, Boyle, Newton, Halley, and many others 
 whose names stand rubric in general literature 
 and science, the period of the Commonwealth is 
 disthiguished by the honored names of Seldeu, 
 Usher, Chillingworth, BarroAY, Taylor, Pocock, 
 Cudworth, Leighton, Baxter, Castell, Lightfoot, 
 Brian Walton, Prynne, Hooker, and Owen, — the 
 brightest stars in Christ's golden candlestick. The 
 catalogue of evil spirits in the first book of Paradise 
 Lost, evinces what acquisitions Milton had made 
 in Kabbinic literature. The " Syntagmata de Diis 
 Syris " by his friend Selden, demonstrates tliat Ori- 
 ental studies were not superficial. It was tlieu that 
 Walton compiled his Polyglot, Cromwell permitting 
 the paper to be imported free : tliat Castell pub- 
 lislied that Herculean work, the " Lexicon Hepta- 
 glotton ; " that Lightfoot in his retired parsonage, 
 and Pocock in Oxford, were prosecuting their 
 thorougli researches in all the Oriental tongues. AVith 
 these men tlie first clergymen of New England were 
 contemporary. They had l^een associated together
 
 21 
 
 in schools, in parishes, and colleges. They shared 
 the enthusiasm of their studies. The sympathy of 
 scholars was not sundered by exile. Harvard Col- 
 lege, at its very origin, included in its course of 
 studies, Hebrew, Chaldee, and Syriac. Dr. Light- 
 foot bequeathed his invalual^le library of Oriental 
 books to that College, which unfortunately were 
 consumed by hre about a century ago. i\Ir. Chaun- 
 cy, the second President of Harvard College, was 
 the intimate friend of Archbishop Usher, and had 
 served as Professor of Hebrew and Greek in the 
 English University at Cambridge. Cotton, the first 
 minister of Boston, was able to converse in Hebrew. 
 The thesis of Cotton Mather, when taking his 
 second de^Tee, was the " Divine origin of the He- 
 brew points." There was an intimate connection 
 kept up for many years between the heads of Mag- 
 dalen, Trinity, and Emmanuel Colleges, and the 
 humble pastors of the small villages around Massa- 
 chusetts Bay ; and at no time in our history has a 
 greater attention been given to the study of Biblical 
 languages than in the first fifty years after the set- 
 tlement of the colony. The clergy were accustomed 
 to read the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures to their 
 families at morning and evening worship. 
 
 It would ]je idle to speculate as to the causes 
 which led to a rapid and general decline in this
 
 22 
 
 department of study. The habits of the colonists 
 were necessarily to a great degree provincial. The 
 attention of the learned in the Old World had as- 
 sumed a new direction. Cudworth and Locke, Samuel 
 Clarke, Shaftesbury, Hobbes, Leibnitz, and Butler 
 had eagerly entered upon the analysis of mental 
 laws and moral actions ; and the great questions of 
 ethical philosophy were fairly l^efore the world. 
 Butler's Analogy was 2)resented to his royal mis- 
 tress, Queen Caroline, in 1736. The treatises of 
 Jonathan Edwards on the Freedom of the Will, 
 and Original Sin, were written between the years 
 1751 and 1757. Xever was there a body of men 
 who, by nature, constitution, and external circum- 
 stances, were more disposed to follow the lead of 
 their distinguished countrymen, than the clergy of 
 New England. Their habits inclined them to great 
 independence of thought. They had little rever- 
 ence for anticpiated authority. They would have 
 reasons for their fjiith. AVe have no occasion to 
 be ashamed of them. It would be ditlicult to find 
 men superior to many of the rural ministers of 
 those days in metaphysical acumen. Whatever 
 may be thought of their particular dogmas, no 
 American can fail to honor Edwards, Hopkins, Bel- 
 lamy, an<l Emmons. Vmt the fact to Ije observed is, 
 tliat for two-thirds of a century, metaphysical theo-
 
 23 
 
 logy had gained tlie entire ascendency. The study 
 of tlie original Scriptures liad passed into a very gen- 
 eral desuetude. Professor Sewall at Harvard, Presi- 
 dent Stiles of Yale College, and Professor Smith of 
 Dartmouth, were rare exceptions to the common con- 
 dition. The effects of this state of things are apparent 
 in the writings of the most distinguished men of that 
 period. Not only are there few references to the 
 original languages of the Scriptures, but fanciful 
 modes of quoting and applying the common version 
 are not infrequent. With the exception of occa- 
 sional references to Pool's Synopsis and Buxtorf on 
 the etymology of particular words, I do not remem- 
 ber a single instance of what may be called Biblical 
 criticism in the writings of Edwards. In his cele- 
 brated letter to the Trustees of Princeton College, on 
 occasion of l^eing elected President of that Institu- 
 tion, he mentions as a reason why he should decline 
 the appointment, his ignorance of the Greek classics. 
 So uniformly severe were the studies of this illus- 
 trious man, that it is doubtful whether his volumi- 
 nous writings contain many quotations from Milton 
 or the whole ransre of classical literature. It is even 
 said of Chauncy, his contemporary and acute oppo- 
 nent, that he was accustomed to wish that Paradise 
 Lost was translatecL This exclusive attention to 
 one study was preparing the way for serious mischief.
 
 24 
 
 Siicli was tlie state of tiling's wlien Prof. Stuart 
 entered upon tlie Professorsliip of Sacred Litera- 
 ture at Andover. AYitli a mind not indisposed to 
 metapliysical discriminations (for, like llobert Hall, 
 lie liad read with relisli Edwards on tlie Will, 
 before lie was twelve years old), lie early saw that 
 the revival of Biblical learning was the great neces- 
 sity of the Church ; and lo this one purpose he 
 addressed himself with the utmost ardor, diligence, 
 patience, wisdom, and success. In his earliest studies 
 he had few faciUties, and but small encouragement. 
 Public sentiment did not look upon his depart- 
 ment with the same favor as that of Theology 
 or Rhetoi'ic. That sentiment it was his to cor- 
 rect, enlighten, and reform. Discouraoino- the task 
 would have appeared to a less earnest nature ; but 
 the concjuest of difficulties to liim presented a j^ecu- 
 liar charm. 
 
 His first act was to be thoroughly accomplished 
 in the Hebrew and Greek laiio-uaii'es. Comi)ared 
 
 O O i. 
 
 with those facilities in our possession, the Ijcst of 
 which are the fruits of his wisdom, how few the 
 aids at his disposal. Tliere were the imperfect 
 Grammars and Lexicons of Buxtorf, Parkhuist and 
 Schleusner. The Hebrew of Parkhurst was witli- 
 out points. The Hebrew Lexicon of Gesenius, that 
 Thesaurus of accurate kiiowledire concerninu' th*.
 
 2o 
 
 original language of the Old Testament and its 
 cognate dialects, was published at Leipsic in 1810- 
 12, just as Prof. Stuart was entering upon his own 
 studies at Andover. Some time elapsed l)efore 
 that book and the Grammar by the same author 
 were known at all in this country. And when 
 known, they were found to l:e unavailable, because 
 written in the German — ^a language at that time 
 known to very few in America or England. To 
 the acquisition of that language Mr. Stuart l^etook 
 himself with all ardor. A great readiness had he 
 in acquiring languages ; and the farmer's son, who, 
 at the ao-e of fourteen had mastered the declensions 
 and syntax of the Latin Grammar in less than a 
 week, wr.s not long in availing himself of the rich 
 stores of philological learning in the German lan- 
 guage. All this was not accomplished without 
 suspicion and whisperings on the part of good 
 men, who doubted whether good could ever come 
 from such a liberality of study. But nothing 
 diverted him for a moment from his religious pur- 
 pose to acquire all knowledge, from all quarters, 
 whicli would aid the g^i'and endeavor of his life, to 
 elucidate the Word of God. 
 
 ( )f liis views concerning German scholarship ; 
 of his just, early and late discriminations as to 
 German theology, I shall take occasion to speak in
 
 26 
 
 a subsefjiieut part of tliis discourse. Honor to the 
 man wlio, alone, unencouraged, was tlie first to 
 introduce to tlie scliolars of Great Britain and tlie 
 United States, those philological researches, by 
 which the Lexicographers of Germany have pour- 
 ed such li2:ht on the Greek and Hebrew toni^ues. 
 
 Tvro years after his entrance u2:)on his professor- 
 ship, Mr. Stuart had prepared a manuscript Gram- 
 mar of the Hebrew language ; and the classes in 
 the Seminary (such was the meagerness of their 
 facilities) were expected to copy this grammar 
 from his manuscripts. The class of 1819, the class 
 of Byington, and Jonas King; of Profs. Henry Rip- 
 ley, Haddock, and Toney ; of Presidents AVheeler, 
 Waylaud, and AVorthington Smith, were the first to 
 copy the manuscript Grammar of Prof. Stuart with 
 points. Subsidizing the help of affluent friends, 
 fonts of Oriental type were imported ; and the 
 necessary apparatus for pubhshing put at his com- 
 mand. But there were no compositors expert in 
 the use of Hebrew type. With liis oioi hjiuh lie 
 commenced tlie worJi^ and so began the education of 
 those compositors,* who, now in different parts of 
 
 * As tliese pastes are passing tlirougli the press of ]\Ir. Joiix F. 
 Troav, of this city, it will not be regarik-J as iinidious if s[K-cial 
 reference is ]ria<.lc to that individual, as one of those wliuni TrutV-ssor 
 Stuart first insti'ucted hn the use of Oriental characters: since the
 
 27 
 
 our land, have attained to a proficiency and accu- 
 racy in the use of Greek and Oriental type, beyond 
 competition, all of whom remember him, as well 
 they may, with filial gratitude and delight. The 
 Codman j^ress, at Andover, has a world-wide repu- 
 tation. In the year 1821 Mr. Stuart puljlished, 
 at his own expense, his Hebrew Grammar, several 
 editions of which rapidly followed ; the first Hebrew 
 Grammar in the English language of great repute. 
 The fourth edition of that Grammar was repub- 
 lished in England by Dr. Pusey, Regius Professor 
 of Hebrew in the University of Oxford ; and no 
 small praise is it that a self-taught Professor in a 
 Theological Seminary, in a rural district of Xew 
 England, should furnish text-books in Oriental phi- 
 lology to the English universities, with their hered- 
 itary wealth of learned treasure and lordly pro- 
 visions for literary leisure. The Hebrew Chresto- 
 matliy of Professor Stuart was reprinted in like 
 manner at Oxford soon after its apj^earance. The 
 Hebrew Grammar by Dr. Lee, of Camljridge Uni- 
 versity, England, did not appear till six years after 
 the publication of Mr. Stuart's first edition. The 
 
 Univeisity Press, under his proprietorsIii]>, has reached a degree of 
 elegance anil accomplishment, ^vhich entitle him to a special and pa- 
 triotic notice. Advertisements of his ait in Oriental tj-pography, are 
 appended to these pages.
 
 28 
 
 gratification wliicli Professor Stuart experienced in 
 tlie successful issue of liis own Grammar, is well 
 remembered by several, tlien in boyliood, who, at 
 his instigation, studied tlie several proof-sheets as 
 they passed from the press, to satisfy him and others 
 that a formidable language was now brought within 
 the reach of the youngest capacity. Of the philo- 
 logical merits of the Grammar I do not now S23eak. 
 Subsequent editions, which were in fact new books, 
 corrected acknowledged defects. To own mistakes 
 when discovered, and to correct them, was the 
 manly ha])it of our instructor. It is truly grand 
 to observe, in all the writings of Prof. Stuart, from 
 the earhest to the latest, an ingenuous disposition to 
 admit preceding errors : there was no pertinacious 
 clinging to an opinion because it was liis own ; and 
 when clearer light was obtained, and better con- 
 victions were reached, it was with the frankness of 
 a little chihl that lie took the lead in directing 
 attention to the fact himself 
 
 The enthusiasm vrith which Mr. Stuart was 
 prosecuting his ])hilological studies was soon im- 
 parted to others ; who seconded his exertions, and 
 in connection with him have accpiired an honoralile 
 fome. The Hebrew and Clialdaic Lexicogi'aphy of 
 Gesenius was transferred into English by Prof. 
 Gibbs. AVhat Gesenius had done in llebreu', Pas-
 
 29 
 
 sow and WaU had accomplished in Greek ; and the 
 Greek and Englisli Lexicon by Prof, llobinson, based 
 on them, soon followed. Both of tliese volumes 
 were commenced in Prof. Stuart's family, and prose- 
 cuted under his aid and supervision ; and, together 
 with similar works, contemporaneous or subsequent, 
 are the fruits of that revival of j)hilological study 
 which began with him, whose memory we are as- 
 sembled to honor. Successive editions of tliese sev- 
 eral lexical works have appeared in Great Britain, 
 and are at this hour acknowledged to be standard 
 authorities as to the languages in which inspired 
 truth was revealed. 
 
 Whatever could cast light upon the Holy Scrip- 
 tures, or the languages in which they were con- 
 tained, was to Prof. Stuart a matter of exuberant 
 deliojht. Whether it was a discussion 1)V Middleton 
 on the Greek article, or an essay by Wyttenbach 
 on the mode of studying language, or the archaeo- 
 logical researches of Jahn, or the journal of an in- 
 telliirent traveller in the E^'ean, or Lane's book on 
 Egy|)t, or the explorations of the French in the val- 
 ley of the xsile,'" or a Greek chorus, or a discovery of 
 an inscription in Arabia Petrea, or exhumations in 
 Nineveh — any thing, from whatever source, which 
 
 ^- Grepjio's Essay on ChainpoUiou \vas translated in his family.
 
 30 
 
 explained a difficult verse in tlie Bible, or illus- 
 trated an ancient curstoni of God's peculiar 2:)eople, 
 or led to a better comprehension of tlie three lan- 
 guages in Avhicli the name of our Lord was written 
 upon his cross — all was hailed by this Christian 
 student with unbounded satisfaction. 
 
 The languages of the insj^ired Scriptures ac- 
 quired," and the acquisition of them rendered facile 
 by grammatical and lexical helps to others, his first 
 endeavor was to ascertain and fix the laws of Biljli- 
 cal interpretation. Sometimes we have doubted 
 whether it were well to erect the rules of herme- 
 neutics into the designation of a science^ so simple 
 and obvious do these rules appear. But when we 
 recall the far-fetched and fanciful interpretations 
 by which those simple rules have been overlaid, 
 not merely by rationalistic writers, but by inju- 
 dicious lexicographers like Parkhurst, not except- 
 ing the Hebrew scholars of the seventeenth cen- 
 tury — when we rememl)er that, in addition to the 
 rules of syntax, language has a history, and that 
 this historico-grammatical sense or v.sus lo(iiiendh 
 must enter into all exegesis — we are convinced 
 
 * His knowleclo'e of IleLrew was such that he read with er|ual 
 ease the ILjLi'ew aud the English lUUe; and often, when contnied 
 to liis bed hy sickiioss. or wahving in a retired street, he would solace 
 his lonely hours Ly chanting aluud the Ilebrew odes of David.
 
 31 
 
 tliat notliing is more important than a correct 
 statement of tlie rules according to wliicli tlie Word 
 of God is to be interpreted. Not to speak of tlie 
 wresting of tlie Scriptures by transatlantic com- 
 mentators wlio could see nothing supernatural in 
 the New Testament ; who would explain Christ's 
 walking iqyon tlie sea as his wading so far as he 
 could and then swimming ; not to dwell on the stu- 
 pendous conceits of Origen ; unhappy mistakes had 
 been made by the best theologians of our country, 
 in the misuse of Scrij)ture language, during the long 
 period of the declension of Biblical study preceding 
 the revival of which we now sj)eak. Not uncom- 
 mon was it for these to quote from the historical or 
 prophetical Scriptures verses which might only be 
 employed by way of analogy, as proofs of a meta- 
 physical distinction. It was needful that the rules 
 which govern Biblical interpretation should most 
 emphatically be re-stated. After all the discri- 
 minations of Morns and Ernesti, republished by 
 Professor Stuart, if I should undertake to con- 
 dense his principles and practice concerning Bib- 
 lical exegesis, aside from all technical phraseology, 
 I should characterize it by common sense. Admit 
 the distinctions as to litei'al and tropical language 
 which are recognized in the ordinary convei'sation 
 of oi'dinary men, and those modifications of Ian-
 
 32 
 
 o'uao-e wliicli are derived from local cu>?toiiis and 
 use, and then let Scripture interpret Scripture. 
 Compare spiritual things with spiritual, and let the 
 obvious meani'iKj of the Sacred Writings thus com- 
 pared, be received as the true. 
 
 As to the personal qualifications of an inter- 
 preter, the one, in addition to all needful kinds of 
 learning, which in his view was essential and indis- 
 pensable, was such a sym2:»athy with tlie religion of 
 the Bible itself, such a subjection of the heart and 
 life to the spirit and precepts of the Son of God, as 
 would give a fiuklc understanding of those things 
 which the natural man could never comprehend. 
 Here was the first point of divergency where he 
 beii'an to part with the most distin£;-uished Dhilolo- 
 gists of Germany. Sympathizing with tlieir enthu- 
 siasm as scholars, honoring them for tlieir literary 
 attainments, feeling' and acknowled^infi' his indebt- 
 
 7 O ^ CD 
 
 edness to them for so numy aids in acijuiriug the 
 knowledii'e of the lana'uaiii-es in which the Scrii )ture5 
 were given, he early felt that the student of the 
 Bible must l)e a man of (rod according to the re- 
 quirement of the Biltle ; that unless he was a spir- 
 itual man himself, he must fail in that discerimient, 
 whicl), to a religious nature, is like instinct and life 
 to the l)ody. 
 
 It has lieen well said, that, '' although there is
 
 33 
 
 only one door to tlie kingdom of heaven, there is 
 many an entrance to scientific divinity. And al- 
 though there are exceptional instances, on the ^^'liole 
 we can predict what class the new-comer will join, 
 by knowing the door through which he entered. 
 If from the wide fields of speculation he has saun- 
 tered inside the sacred inclosure ; if he is a historian 
 who has been carried captive by the documentary 
 demonstration ; or a poet who has been arrested 
 by the spiritual sentiment ; or a philosopher who 
 has been won over l)y the Christian theory, he is 
 apt to patronize the gospel to which he has given 
 his accession, and, like Clemens Alexandrinus, or 
 Hugo Grotius, or Alphonse de Lamartine, he will 
 join the school where Taste and Reason alternate 
 with Revelation, and where ancient classics and 
 modern sages are scarcely subordinate to the men 
 " who spake as tliey were moved by the Holy 
 Ghost." On the other hand, if, fleeino- from the 
 wrath to come, through some faitliful saying lie has 
 struo'O'led into enouo-h of knowled^-e to calm his 
 conscience and give him peace with Heaven, the 
 oracle which assured his spirit will be to him 
 unique in its nature and supi'eme in its authority ; 
 and, a delator to the scheme to which he owes his 
 very self, like Augustine, and Cowper, and Chal- 
 mers, he will join the school where Revelation is 
 3
 
 34 
 
 absolute, and where "thus saith the Lord" makes 
 an end of every matter." * 
 
 The two great principles which were to Prof. 
 Stuart as guides and as laws, in all his pursuits, were 
 these ; The Word of God the ultimate and su- 
 pkeme authority ; and the perfect freedom of 
 the numa:x mind ix the i^'terpretatiox of that 
 Word, accouxtable to xoxe but its xIuthor. 
 His very aim being to deliver theology from meta- 
 physical bondage, his first and last inquiry was, on all 
 theological and ethical topics. What saith tlte Word 
 of the Lord ? The exercise of reason he never 
 scouted or abjured, l)ut, believing that the Scrip- 
 tures were inspired of God, it was with him the 
 sign and perfection of reason to bow to their supre- 
 macy. In the nature of things, he could look with 
 no favor upon ecclesiastical authority. Eevering 
 and loving' the old scholars : honoring' ^ood men, 
 who, organized or individual, had done service to 
 the world, he acknowledged no man as master. He 
 put no Confession or Catechism above the Bible ; 
 and rejected none which agreed with the Bible. 
 The honestly-interpreted language of inspired Scrip- 
 ture had more weight and authority with him than 
 any creed, or council, or assembly, or church, in the 
 world. IIow free his mind was in following the 
 
 *' Xui'tli Britisli Review.
 
 35 
 
 Scriptures, appears from the frequent instances in 
 which he differed from some whom he had always 
 loved and honored. 
 
 Amicus Plato, amicus Socrates, sed magis arnica Veritas. 
 
 How honest was his mind appears from this, that 
 he never strained a passage to an unnatural applica- 
 tion. Xever would he rely upon a doubtful verse, 
 preferring the greatest liberality in abandoning a 
 questionable text, conceding some which most are 
 unwilling to yield, rather than subject himself to 
 the imputation of an unfair and disingenuous perver- 
 sion of inspired language. Whether the discussion 
 related to an article of the creed, the nature of sin, 
 the doctrine of imputation, the divinity of Christ, 
 the eternity of future punishment, the use of wine 
 or the fact of ancient servitude, the habit of his 
 mind and the aim of his study, as every unpreju- 
 diced man must admit, was to give the liistorico- 
 grammatical interpretation of the inspired volume. 
 
 A happy illustration of this rule may be found in 
 his relation to the Unitarian controversy in this coun- 
 try. After the discussion had proceeded between 
 theological professors, the admirable letters of Prof 
 Stuart to Dr. Channing, revealed plainly enough on 
 what ground it was necessary to rest the whole sub- 
 ject ; an ap])eal to the simxAe Word of God. He
 
 36 
 
 saw iu an instant, that the discussion involved, as a 
 vital princi2:)le, a belief in tlie inspiration and autlior- 
 ity of the Scriptures ; and now the ample stores of 
 his Biblical study came into use and application. 
 Men who had stood by and shaken their heads, and 
 doubted what would come from it, when he was 
 delving in the philological researches of German 
 scholarship, now hailed him with admiration, with 
 enthusiasm, with exultation, when, as the result of his 
 wise and severe prej^aration, he furnished that admi- 
 rable argument, founded on the grammatical inter- 
 pretation of the Xew Testament, which, to this day, 
 lia-s- never leen euu-icereil. Arguments against the 
 evangelical creed, and in favor of what is generally 
 designated as Unitarianism, have since appeared, of 
 various degrees of plausibility and skill ; Ijut where 
 is there a treatise, or an attem})t at one, f<junded as 
 is that of Professor Stuart, on the honest philology 
 of the original Scrijjtures i 
 
 The inspiration of the Scriptures was witli him 
 a belief, which admitted no reserve, or equivocation, 
 or hesitancy. To 
 
 Th;n first, that last, tliat midst and "witliout end, 
 
 he gave tlie full assent of his mind and heart. 
 That he believed when he began his acquaint- 
 ance with German literature, and he believed it,
 
 37 
 
 if possil)le, yet more, wlien that acquaintance had 
 enhii'^ed into a full understandinc; of transatlan- 
 tic opinions. Much has been said of late, with 
 more or less of discrimination, as to the good or 
 evil of ac(][uaintance, on the part of American 
 theologians, with the theological productions of 
 Germany. It has been suspected that one is in 
 danger of making shipwreck of his faith by any 
 degree of familiarity with the language in which 
 these opinions are contained. Surely the opinion is 
 not tenable by a sound mind, that one set to the 
 defence of the faith, should keep himself uninformed 
 of the sentiments which are abroad, because they are 
 re]3uted to be false. Apply this principle, and you 
 must deny to the theological student any knowledge 
 of the fact that the evidences of Christianity have 
 been disputed in his own tongue, and leave him un- 
 furnished with all weapons of defence. You must 
 lower your lil)erality into an exact imitation of the 
 Papacy, and Protestantism must have its "Index 
 Expurgatorius," its " JAhri prohibiti," and ignorance 
 must be hailed as the dc^feiice of orthodoxy. When 
 Bil^lical criticism l)egan to revive in the middle of 
 the eighteenth century in Germany, through various 
 causes, chiefly the low state of piety in the Lutheran 
 church, it took a visilde tendency towards ISTeology. 
 Eruesti, Michaelis, and Eichhorn, enthusiasts in classi- 
 cal learning, applied the same principles to the study
 
 38 
 
 of the Bible, wliicli governed them in profane criti- 
 cism. The distinction between the natural and the su- 
 pernatural was ignored. Hence it occurred that ideas 
 peculiar to Christianity were made to conform, more 
 or less, to deistical notions. Every thing which we 
 believe to be supernatural in the terms " Holy Spirit'" 
 and "Kegeueration," was softened down into the com- 
 mon ideas of praiseworthy qualities, and reception 
 into a religious community. The opposition be- 
 tween ouQ^ and Tivtvuxc was nothing more than the 
 contrast between reason and sensuality. Such was 
 the origin of that error which has lipened into all the 
 later forms of transatlantic infidelity. The life of 
 Professor Stuart began under very diflerent auspices. 
 Born in a laud, where not only the clearest distinc- 
 tions of doctrinal theology had been established, 
 but where Christianity itself was a living power : 
 " born again " in the revivals of Xew England, ex- 
 periencing and observing the power of the Gospel 
 as a regenerating agent, a spiritual man liimself, he 
 struck at once the distinction between the natural 
 and the supernatural. The Bible was not to be 
 looked at and judged by one faculty. He saw the 
 fatal deficiency of (rerman philologists. He saw it 
 in Rosenmuller. He felt it in Kuinoel. Early did he 
 foresee what we now see, as tlie i-esult of tliis early 
 heartless ci'iticism. He forewaiiied every Biblical 
 student of the dangers which were ahead. The super-
 
 39 
 
 natural inspiration, and so tlie superhuman autliority 
 of tlie Word of God, was the key-note of all he said 
 and wrote. Whenever, in later times, he detected 
 the least tendency, as he supposed, in men like 
 Neander, and Tholuck, whom he loved as his own 
 soul, to lower in any degree the orthodox views of 
 inspiration, he pointed it out with the most em- 
 phatic reprobation. In the very last criticism from 
 his pen,* he mourns with inexpressible sorrow, that 
 Hengstenberg, whose previous writings on the Chris- 
 tology of the Old Testament he had so much admired, 
 should have so far conformed to a prevalent national 
 habit, as to have sul)stituted an " ideal good man" 
 for the person of the Messiah in some of the prophetic 
 Psalms. Such " silver fog " had no attractions for a 
 mind so sober and honest as his. The fair interpreta- 
 tion of the Bible as a book inspired, and not merely 
 the record of an inspiration, the recejotacle of a vola- 
 tile essence, this was his anchor and watchword to the 
 very last. " Xew times and new dangers call for new 
 and adequate defences," said he, in the article refer- 
 red to, and this may be taken as his dying testimony 
 to his country. " Our all is at stake on the Bil)le. 
 As surely as its inspiration is set aside, and our people 
 are taught that enlightened views demand them to 
 give it up, so surely is there an end to all evangelical 
 
 * Bibliotheca Sacra, Jan. 1852.
 
 40 
 
 religion among the masses, for tliey are no plii- 
 losopliers in casuistry, and in tlie theory of reli- 
 gion. All that pertains to mere philology, the Ger- 
 mans have done more effectually, in general, than 
 any other writers whatever. But on this point of 
 all points, the real Christology of the Bible, it seems 
 to me unsafe to follow them. Then let a ministry 
 be trained up among ourselves, who are able and 
 willing to defend to the last extremity and trium- 
 phantly, that holy citadel of Christianity, tlLe Scrip- 
 tures given hy inspiration of GodT AYise testimony 
 with which to close a long life of discriminating and 
 consistent instruction ! 
 
 It may T)e projier here to observe, that so inti- 
 mate and extensive was the acquaintance of Professor 
 Stuart with the writers of Germany, that two arti- 
 cles prepared by him on this sul)ject for the first 
 volume of the "Spirit of the Pilgrims," in lS2<s, were 
 repuidished entire in the London Eclectic Peview of 
 the same year ; the first deviation from the policy 
 of that journal for thirty volumes, in selecting and 
 repuldishing what was not original matter ; and this 
 on the ground that nowhere else was it able to 
 obt[iin a better statement of German opinions. 
 
 The first Commentary puldished by Professor 
 Stuart, that upon the Epistle to the Hebrews, a 
 model work of its kind, may furnish a good illus-
 
 41 
 
 tration of tlie service wLicli lie rendered to his pro- 
 fession. The only Commentaries on this Ej)istle in 
 our Language, of any repute, prior to Mr. Stuart's, 
 not including the learned work of Mackniglit on all 
 the Epistles, were the one by John Owen, a cen- 
 tury and a half before, republished in this country 
 in 1811, and the other l)y James Pierce in 1733, 
 much esteemed by Professor Stuai-t, but never re- 
 pul)lished, and l)ut little known to Cis-Atlantic 
 readers. The commentary of Owen, like the other 
 huge folios made by giants in his times, is immensely 
 prolix and excursive. Its essays on the priesthood 
 of Christ are noble contributions to a systematic 
 Cliri.-«tology ; and the illustration of the Ej^istle is 
 enriched by stores of Eabbinical learning : but it 
 abounds with such a weight of doctrinal and experi- 
 mental statement, with so many digressions, each 
 worthy to be a treatise by itself, that while every 
 theologian has consulted, few have had the valor to 
 master it, as a whole ; while the material fact was, 
 that objections had Ijeen started to the authenticity 
 of the E^nstle itself l)y the later sceptics and critics of 
 Germany, which demanded an answer. The work of 
 Prof Stuart was singularh' methodical, comprehen- 
 sive, and complete. Thoroughly furnished and disci- 
 plined l)y his peculiar studies, he came forward to 
 take up the gauntlet which had been thrown duv.'n 
 with so much vaunting l)y the German critics. Ques-
 
 42 
 
 tions, whicli it liad been supposed, tlie celel^rity of 
 Eieliliorn, Bertholdt and De Wette liad decided 
 against tlie canonical authority of the l30ok, were 
 subjected to a new and rigid investigation ; and scep- 
 tical conclusions in some instances with triumph, in 
 all with satisfaction, are revei'sed. The authenticity 
 of the book vindicated by its history, a new transla- 
 tion follows, with a commentary on the whole text ; 
 of which the chief merit is its felicitous analysis of 
 the apostolic argument in its connection and har- 
 mony of parts ; chapters and verses which before 
 had seemed too much as " disjecta memlra^^'' arrang- 
 inf^' themselves in the order and relation of a com- 
 pact and organic whole.'^ 
 
 In 1832, appeared his Commentary on the Epis- 
 tle to the Romans. The oiiginal commentary by 
 Professor Tholuck was translated into English in 
 1833 ; and Calvin on the same Epistle, in Eondon, 
 in 183-1; both of which translations are among the 
 fruits of that revival of Biljlical literature, of wliich 
 the object of this memoir was undoubtedly the 
 author. It would l)e impossiljle for any one to wiite 
 
 * The London EvangX'lical Magazine of 1S28, unliositatiiigly pro- 
 nounces rrofessor Stuart's Cominentary on the Kpi.-lle to the 
 Hebrews, as the " most vahuible phiLjlogical help ever piiblislied in 
 the En ghsh language," for the critical study of this important buuk of 
 the XfW Testament. This and the Conunentary on Itomans Avere re- 
 publish.ed in England by l)rs. J. 1'. Smith and Ilendcrsiju.
 
 43 
 
 upon the Epistle to tlie Romans, witliout passing 
 within the suspicion of tlieological prt^udice from 
 some quarter. But let any one peruse the preface of 
 Prof. Stuart to this Commentary, and we cannot see 
 how he can fail to admire its childlike honesty, or 
 concede that the work is accomplished with as much 
 candor as belongs to any thing human. Plain enough, 
 he did not Ijegin with Van Maestric or Turretin, and 
 then resort to the Apostolic argument for proofs 
 of his preconceived theology. He supports no 
 views as a polemic partisan. He maintains no hy- 
 pothesis as a prejudiced disputant. He presents, with 
 a most skilful regard to the particles of connection, 
 the reasonings of the Apostle, according to the rules 
 of Greek syntax. In so doing, he endeavors to disen- 
 tangle the web which speculative theology has wo- 
 ven, and set aside all that is irrelevant. The "loci vex 
 atissimi" he desimates with an honest announcement. 
 AVhere he is not satisfied himself, he frankly avows it, 
 counting the humility of ignorance far better than 
 the arrogance of conceit. At one time, he differs from 
 the paraphrase of Dr. Taylor, and again from Calvin ; 
 and if every theologian does not find in this admirable 
 work, all which he might desire to support the dog- 
 mas to which, from the prejudices of education, he has 
 been attached, it will be for him to show by a Ijetter 
 philology of the Greek construction, that the original 
 text will bear a truer meaning.
 
 44 
 
 It would be impossible in tbe limits of tliis 
 discourse, to give a full and correct historical de- 
 tail of all tlie writings of Professor Stuart. Not the 
 least in permanent value are his contributions to 
 our principal theological publications, to the amount 
 of over two thousand pages, embracing some of the 
 most interesting and able discussions in all Bi])lical 
 literature. 
 
 There is one subject upon which, did time allow, 
 we should be pleased to dilate, both for its intrinsic 
 importance, and the degree of study bestowed upon 
 it by our revered instructor — the interpretation of 
 the j)ro])lietical Scriptures. Two things pertaining 
 to the prophecies did not suit his habit of tliiidv- 
 ing ; that they should be overlooked and under- 
 valued ; or that they should be perverted l^y pri- 
 vate interpretation into all manner of fanciful con- 
 ceits. Many parts of his work on the Apocalypse 
 controvert the common opinions of Bil^lical readers. 
 But the immense amount of learning displayed in 
 completing what may l^e called the natural history 
 of the l)ook, may wait long for a competent critic 
 to pronounce upon its merits. Whether we believe 
 or disbelieve his conclusions in many passages, it 
 is alike the propriety of candor, and the absolute 
 necessity of the case, that this attempt to elucidate 
 a book of acknowledged mystery, of seals, and vi-
 
 45 
 
 sions, and nneartlily agents, should aljide not only the 
 judgment of posterity, but, as ^VG are convinced, the 
 disclosures of future centuries. 
 
 AVe are not so presumptuous as to enter upon 
 a critical examination of the several productions of 
 Prof. Stuart. Admit that many opinions, inaccura- 
 cies if you will, are to Le found in them which you 
 are not disposed to receive. Assert, if it 1)6 your 
 opinion, that in his chosen line of study there are 
 his superiors. Then will we ask you candidly to 
 survey the labors of one, through whose service 
 you are enalded to detect what is inaccurate, and 
 improve upon what is defective. Then will we ask 
 you especially to observe that we are speaking of 
 one who never harbored the thought of personal 
 infallibility ; who was always improving upon him- 
 self ; whose very characteristic was that noble mao-- 
 nanimity which consists not in never slipping, but 
 always rising again, and advancing upon his own 
 ideas of excellence ; therefore, let no mistake or 
 defect discerned by the nicest criticism render you 
 blind to what is essentially good and great. In 
 particular fpialities he may have many e(|uals and 
 superiors ; but in that rare combination of many 
 excellencies which fitted liim for his sphere and his 
 times he was unrivalled. Xot to admit these obli- 
 gations would be to inutate the requital which
 
 46 
 
 stings the bosom hj wliicli the warmth of life was 
 imparted. 
 
 But it was in his personal intercom-se with his 
 students, and especially in the lecture room, that 
 the influence of Prof. Stuart was the most remarka- 
 ble. Place some men, of great learning and accom- 
 plishments, before a class, and their presence is 
 weak and their speech contemptible. They ac- 
 complish far more with the joen than tlie voice. 
 The reverse of this was true with our instructor. 
 Punctual at the appointed hour, a brief and im- 
 pressive prayer for divine direction commenced the 
 exercise, and so rapid were the electric sparks 
 which, in the form of questions, remarks and sug- 
 gestions, flew off on the right hand and left, that 
 the most slua^2:ish nature was roused, the utmost 
 enthusiasm excited, and when the hour was passed, 
 a whole class hurried to the prosecution of their 
 studies, as if they had just discovered what treasures 
 of knowledge were opening Ijefore them, and that 
 life was too short to waste a moment in their acqui- 
 sition. "Whether we can analyze the secret of it 
 or not, he must have posses-ed an extraordinary 
 power over the minds of his pupils, when the men- 
 tion of his name, or a glimpse of his person, never 
 failed to a^\'aken a kindly emotion ; when the repe- 
 tition of his Latin maxims, or the imitation of a
 
 47 
 
 gesture peculiar to himself, excites a grateful smile, 
 as recalling sometliing particularly pleasant. The 
 personal habits of small men are worthy of no 
 notice. The secret of all this was in the honest 
 and hearty sympathy he felt in all that was gene- 
 rous and good.''^ 
 
 * From a note received from Rev. ^Ir. Byington, now superin- 
 tending, in this city, tlie printing of the Choctaw translation of the 
 Old Testament, I c|uote the following extract : — " Mr. Stuart gave 
 great attention to our class, as it was the first that studied Ilebrew 
 under him with the points. He had great power to rouse up our 
 minds and draw our hearts to him. I need not say how much, as a 
 missionary, I have been benefited by his instructions during all my 
 life among the Indians. His works have a peculiar power to make 
 the reader feel that he also is jyt'^sent. His urging us to read some 
 Hebrew every day has had a kind of legal force with me for many 
 years. In my log cabin in the woods, often have I dreamed of being- 
 back at Andover, till in my dream I have wept. 
 
 " Last summer I visited Andover. I went first to the very room 
 I once occupied ; where I had prayed with Fisk and Parsons, Spaul- 
 ding and Winslow, Thurston, Temple, Goodell, and Bird. My heart 
 was full enough. 
 
 " I called on Prof. Stuart, and was directed to his study. I had 
 not seen him since February, 1820. I was afraid he would not 
 know me. I met him and called him by name. He approached me 
 with open hand, looked for a moment, and said, ' Ah, yes ! I know 
 you by your eye.' Glad was I to ]:»e known on earth by such a man. 
 So many dear friends I had met who knew me not, that the prospect 
 of meeting others began to be painful. I inquired of him about 
 his studies. He very pleasantly remarked, ' I feel as though I was
 
 48 
 
 As to tlie personal cliaracter of Prof. Stuart, it 
 was read and known of all men. Whatever faults 
 he had, never did he subject one to the necessity 
 of ferretino^ them out. Frank, confidino' and im- 
 pulsive, he abhorred dissimulation. Never could he 
 afford the time, nor subject himself to the trouble 
 of accomplishing an end by circumvention, so long- 
 as he believed tliat a straight line — ^tliat beauti- 
 ful symbol of righteousness — ■ was in morals, as in 
 mathematics, the shortest between two points. He 
 would rather have been accused of imprudence than 
 suspected of trickery. Familiar with his person 
 and domestic haljits from my infancy, it is some- 
 thing for me to say that lie was always the favorite 
 of the young. Ardent in temperament, transpa- 
 rent in character, simple in manners, there were 
 a thousand points ■\^diere his manly sympatliies 
 touched the affinities of Ijoyhood. The necessities 
 of a nervous temperament oljliging him to be 
 
 now aljout prepared for my laljoi's.' 1 )cep "was llie interest he 
 exjirc--L-i] in all Lis old students. '•'' '•'■' '•'" '" '•' ^ 
 
 ■"I met liini once niure. ^\llen he Avas taking liis niornin^' walk. 
 Ilis grrC'ting was ^pi-eially kind. An<l there 1 parted -with the man 
 wLom^ intiuenre ov^r me had heen the me>-t marked and decisive all 
 my life. And tlit-re. in my memory, with his statf in his hand, and 
 his kiinl luuks un a Choctaw nri->ii)nary, he lives, and will li\e in 
 !ny memory till I g<j whei'e I hope to meet him in the presence of 
 our Saviour in heaven."
 
 49 
 
 methodical in physical exercise, his ardor in. work- 
 ing his garden, plying an axe and saw, or accom- 
 plishing his daily walk, had a charm for the 2:)eople 
 of simple habits among whom lie lived ; revealing 
 to them that he was amljitious of nothing beyond 
 sound health of l:)ody and mind, for the better 
 prosecution of his professional pursuits. Xever 
 overstepping the proprieties of his profession, he 
 was not suspected of any thing bordering on the 
 artificial and sanctimonious. Leaning over a fence, 
 when taking his accustomed walk, he had some- 
 thing to say to a kxljorer which would make him his 
 admiring friend for life. The correspondent and 
 friend of distinguished men across the sea, who will 
 hear of his decease with great grief, no mourners at 
 his funeral were more deeply moved than the farm- 
 ers and mechanics whom he had accosted with kind 
 greetings every day for forty years. Addicted to 
 the life of a student, study was his delight. Adopt- 
 ing a few hours for severe and uninterrupted study, 
 rarely exceeding three and a half — and these in the 
 early part of the day — (his varied and immense 
 readinir in other hours would have been called 
 study 1)y others) — he never worked with a jaded, 
 strained and wearied mind ; consequently, hardship 
 was never associated with his pursuits, but delight 
 always. How often did he refer — the reference
 
 50 
 
 may l)e met several times in liis writings, and 
 often was it made in conversation- — ^to the marked 
 difference between Dr. Johnson and Passow, Lexi- 
 cographers, one of English and the other of Greek, 
 as to the feelings with which they pursned their 
 work. The former has defined a Lexicographer as 
 "a liOJ- rules s draJjje^'^ showing that Johnson, while 
 he revelled in book-reading, vras disgusted with 
 the toils of a philologist in hook-making. But 
 Passow describes his own work after tliis manner : 
 •• It is common for the writers of dictionaries to 
 complain of their tedious, protracted, hateful toil, 
 in order, as it would seem, to set off their pre-emi- 
 nent reii'ard for the public, in submitting' to be 
 drudges so long fur their profit. I have no such 
 story to tell. On the contrary, I have laTjored 
 more than twenty years on this ^rork, and in-ti-ad 
 of beimi" stretched on the rack all tlii^ time, I have 
 been only swimming in an Cjcean of jdeasure." 
 " ^ohlij sold!" was the lii'cirt}' language of appro- 
 bation Avith which Prof Stuart ah\"ays rpioted the 
 Greek Philologist, as expressive of the })lea<ure 
 he had himself derived from intellectual labors. 
 That plea--ure was never exliausted. N<.) pursuit, 
 no positi(jn in the world could have tempted him 
 from tliose studies which were the ofyect and the 
 reward of his life. Because, in a recent cri-i> of
 
 51 
 
 the country, lie Avas constrained l)y liis views of 
 duty, self-moved and spontaneous as I know the 
 act to have been, to sun'C-est some IjilJical and 
 philological facts which liad a direct hearing on 
 political cpiestions then agitating the nation, it has 
 been whispered in some quarters that he was am- 
 bitious of entei'ing upon political life. Never was 
 there a surmise more unfounded. To those who 
 knew him best, there is in it somethino; hidicrous 
 and absurd. There was not an office in the world 
 wdiicli, in his view, had greater charms, or higher 
 honors, than tliat of an interpreter of the Word of 
 God. In a letter received from him not long 
 before his death, he says, " I am meditating fresh 
 labors. I think of a volume on Jonah, Ilabakkuk, 
 and Nahum ; and am balancing between this and 
 the E})istle to the Galatians. Often do I weep in 
 secret j^laccs over this })ros23ect," — • referring to 
 new forms of scepticism - — " and ardently long to 
 do something more in defence of auilwritative uh<<][)i- 
 rat'ioii^ our only charter and compass." Two days 
 l>ef()re he died he finished the revision of his Com- 
 mentary on the book of Proverbs, just now about 
 to be issned from the press, and to which a melan- 
 choly interest will alAva}'s attach as the latest pro- 
 duction of his pen. 
 
 The Commentaries of Prof Stuart not l)einii'
 
 02 
 
 adapted for popular use, Lut designed for profes- 
 sional students, tlieir sale was never very lucrative 
 to liim. In their disposition, the noLle enthusiasm 
 of the scholar was always uppermost, often, as he 
 has heen told by others, to his pecuniary loss. 
 With a morbid sensibility did he shun, as a thing 
 to be loathed, the imputation of making a book for 
 the sake of money. If the choice had Ijeen for him 
 to make between a scholai'ly Ijook, which would do 
 honor to his profession and his country, with no 
 gain but even a loss of money to him, and a com- 
 mon-place volume, designed for popularity, with 
 immense sales and immense profits, he could not 
 have hesitated for a moment. A lo\'e for his pro- 
 fession, and a religious amlution to elevate and 
 honor it, compelled him to turn from pj'o})osals, 
 frequently addressed to him, to prepare a series of 
 more popular puTdications, and the high-toned })ur- 
 pose which forbade his concession to a more lu- 
 crative employment was not without some fears, 
 shadows and anxieties as to future supyport, which 
 only rendered his j'^Grsistence the more manly and 
 heroic.''" 
 
 ■'* Tliiit I speak not imachisftdlv on this suhjoct Aviil a])poar from 
 tlic folloAviiiL;' extract of a ](_-ttcr, addix-ssed tu J'rof. Stuart hy one of 
 tlie largest ])ul>llsliiiig- Louses in the country. It lias referenc(; to 
 negotiations for the puhlieation of his ■\vork on l*ro\erl)s.
 
 53 
 
 These anxieties, creating more or less of despon- 
 dency, were never known l)eyond tlie confidence of 
 private friendship. The public never suspected that 
 his latest labors Avere projected and prosecuted with 
 a secret hurt in his heart. Less we cannot utter 
 than this decided testimony, that it would have 
 been more for the honor of our Alma Mater to 
 have retained this distino:uislied Professor in the 
 full emoluments of that office upon which his name 
 had shed sucli renown, to the very end of his days, 
 rather than, by accepting the resignation which his 
 own nice and delicate sense of honor had volun- 
 teered, in view of declining health, to have entailed 
 the possibility of wounding in the evening of his 
 life the man to whom so much of her fame was 
 owing.'"'' Those lil^ei'al-minded merchants, Bartlett 
 and Brown, could never have cherished any thing 
 but generosity for one whose success and honor 
 were a reward and honor to themselves. 
 
 "AVe h;icl supposed tlint tlic work referred to was a lyojyular 
 commentary. "With a work of tliis Idiid, from your pen, and on such 
 a subjeet, we coukl 'take the country.' But, creditable to us as it 
 certainly would be, we are really afraid to commit ourselves for the 
 publication of tlie more learned and critical work now 2'>roposcd." 
 
 '''■' 'J'he writer is aware of tlic explanation given of this measure ; 
 that the endowments of tlie Seminary yielded but a certain amount 
 of income, and that this amount Avas necessary to renumerate tlie
 
 54 
 
 But here is a disparity — tlie inadequate rewards 
 of literary taleut and attainment' — which, for its 
 explanation, demands all our philosophy and all our 
 religion. A man with no thirst for knowledge, and 
 no taste for letters, rises to affluence, though nnable 
 to read the inscription emblazoned on the panels 
 of his equipage ; while another, devoting a whole 
 life to studies which advance learnhio' and reliaiou, 
 and reflect honor on the land of liis niitivity, poorly 
 compensated at the best, must bear up, at last, with 
 the despondent fear, that an nnrequited toil may 
 terminate in an old age of dependence. The essay 
 
 actual services of instructors, -with no sur}>lus for the support of others, 
 bevond the iiieayre sum >\hieh was allowed the two oldest Professors on 
 their retirement, after having been eonneeted >vith the Institution for 
 nearly half a centuiy. The (-eneral Assembly of the Presbyti-rian 
 Church u'<.'nerou>lv insisted that ])v. Miller, oil resigning his C(Minection 
 ^vitll rrinceton Theological Scnhnary, should continue to receive the 
 full amount cif his former salary for life. And >ve cannot but think 
 had tlie fict been known to the chui'chcs of Ma<saeliusctts that I'rof. 
 Stuart, when a vear's illness, ly which he Jiad lieeii dejirived of the 
 powei' to ^tudy and instruct, led him to tender the re-ignalidU of liis 
 oftii-e, was at once reduced from the c>rdinai'v stijicnd wliich haliils 
 liad made essential to his comfjit. to a small fi'actidu of the amount, 
 tliey Would have sjiontaneously furnidied the Seminar\- witli the 
 means of a more just, not to say lilieral procedure, auil so have saved 
 one of the most distingui-lied s(holars of oiu' land hv>m a state of 
 mental dt'pi'cssion, Avhich, for two years, was as the valley uf the 
 sliadow of death.
 
 00 
 
 of Epictetiis explains the ni}'stery in part : all these 
 thino's are commodities in tlie market of life, and it 
 is 1)\' exchanges and Ijarter that one is procured at 
 the loss of another ; and the attahnnents and re- 
 wards of Christian scholarship are cheaply bought 
 at any price, even if the AVord of God did not de- 
 cide the l)alance hj tlie promise of future reversals 
 and promotion, " TJiei/' irorhs do follow tli.em.y 
 The Dervise in the Arabian tale was riii'ht when 
 he abandoned to his comrade the camels with their 
 load of jewels and gold, while he retained the cas- 
 ket of that mysterious juice which enabled him to 
 l)ehold, at one glance, all the hidden riches of the 
 universe. '■•■ Xo external advantage is to be compared 
 with that purification of the intellectual eye, which 
 enables us to contemplate the infinite wealth of the 
 spiritual world. 
 
 That which gave liveliness and warmth to the 
 character of Prof. Stuart was his undissembled 
 ])iety. It was no secular and)ition which impelled 
 him. Xo one could have sus})ected such a motive. 
 A\']iether as a pastor, or a student, the promotion of 
 pure religion, the extension of the Redeemer's king- 
 dom, was the ascendant purpose and delight of his 
 life. Thei'c was one occasion, where his deportment 
 was so rcmarkal)le that it never failed to leave a 
 
 ''' Macaulr 
 
 ■^}''
 
 56 
 
 deep impression on every sj^ectator — ilie table of 
 our Lord. So tliorouglily had liis mind become 
 imljued, by long study, witli all tlie syml:)olic prom- 
 ises and didactic expositions of that great event 
 which the Eucharist was desio'ned to commemorate ; 
 and so thoroughly pervaded was his heart with the 
 gratitude and love which the scene insj^ired, that 
 emotion was often denied an utterance, and the 
 deep 2:)athos of his pra}'ers comes back to the mem- 
 ory of many, as they stirred our hearts in former 
 years. The religion of " a broken heart " pervaded 
 his theological science. The atonement by the Di- 
 vine Redeemer was not a cold speculation, but the 
 life of his life, and the anticipated joy of his eter- 
 nity ; and the fervent and indescribaljle manner 
 with which he was wont to ascribe " blessing a^n'd 
 iioxoii a:s"d glory and do3Iixion" unto the Lamb,'' 
 revealed the delio-lit which now he feels, amid the 
 choirs of the blessed, harping witli their harps, and 
 casting their crowns before the throne, in the adc)- 
 rations and rejoicings of heaven. 
 
 Althoui^'h he had reached the limit of threescore 
 years and ten, many circumstances coml)ined to 
 create the liope that Prof Stuart would prosecute 
 his studies for several years t<> come. A slight ac- 
 cident, as we say, decided the case otherwise. Tak- 
 ing his daily walk the sled of a boy occasioned him
 
 a fall ill tlie street, by whicli tlie bone of the wrist 
 was fractured. The pain and confinement wliicli 
 followed rendered liim nnable to withstand a severe 
 cold by which he was subsecjuently seized, and 
 which, passing into a typhoid fever of several days, 
 terminated his earthly life. At times during his 
 illness, his mind displayed its usual vigor, and he 
 conversed on subjects of public interest with that 
 vivacity which was common to him. T^o apprehen- 
 sions of immediate danger were felt by his family 
 until the day on whicli he died. 
 
 AA'hen his pliysician expressed to him at one 
 time the hope that his sickness was not unto death. 
 he replied, "Unto the glory of God — Inji unto 
 death." With perfect serenity he conversed of the 
 prospect before him ; and expressing no wish to 
 continue longer, save for the sake of his ftimih' and 
 the execution of a "three yeai*s' woi'k," in his fa- 
 vorite study, which he had already projected, his 
 strong desire was to go so soon as God should see 
 fit to grant him release. 
 
 Twenty-three years before — the association may 
 be pardoned to filial remembrance — a Christian 
 mother, in the neiii^liborhood, was waitinii' the near 
 approach of death. It was a night of uncommon 
 severity ; an unprecedented storm was raging with- 
 out, but all was serenity within. ]\[r. Stuart, whom
 
 58 
 
 neither cold nor tempest conld deter from tlie offices 
 of frieudslii]), was there, to give the last consolations 
 of religion to the dying and the bereaved. With 
 the return of winter, the storm has come again, and 
 it is howling over the house-tops as before. He 
 who was the consoler before, is the sufferer now. 
 Snfferer is not the word — for God had spared him 
 pain, and in the exhaustion of death was mingled 
 peace in believing. Knowing that the hour so 
 often anticipated had come, he said that he icas 
 ready- — ^that his confidence in the gospel had lifted 
 his soul above- all doubts, and at midnight, on the 
 first Sabbath of the year, he Cj[uietly fell asleep. 
 
 Our venerated instructor and generous friend is 
 o'one. AVe cannot stifle our regret, when we think of 
 his familiar form as buried beneath the snows of 
 winter ; but this is our joy that on earth he has ac- 
 complished a noljle work, and the rewards thereof 
 he will ever enjoy in heaven. His real life is not 
 and cannot be lost. That which, amid nniny dis- 
 coura<2:ements, he had undertaken fortv-two vears 
 before, he was permitted to see successfully accom- 
 plished. He had rejoiced over the revival and ex- 
 tension of Ijiblical studies. The idea of what was 
 befitting a theological education had been essen- 
 lially modified. He had trained up a cor])s of min- 
 isters, who, not delieient in other matters, are dis-
 
 . 59 
 
 tingulslied for an exegetical knowledge of tlie in- 
 spired Scriptures. lie lias left Iteliiud liim many 
 Elislias, in whose zeal and success in biblical learn- 
 ing lie felt tlie deepest interest. Placed in jjei'sonal 
 contact witli some fifteen hundred students, since 
 then, the presidents and professors of seminaries 
 and colleges, pastors of churches, missionaries of the 
 gospel, secretaries of philanthropic societies, editors 
 of literary and religious publications, his influence 
 has been and will be felt in e\'ery ([uarter of the 
 glolje. There is one aspect of that influence which 
 possesses a peculiar interest. The zeal ^\hich ani- 
 mated him in the study of the original Scriptures, 
 and the rules which guided him in their interpreta- 
 tion, were repeated by his many pupils, who, going 
 from under his innnediate instruction, were set to 
 the foundation-work of modern missions, the trans- 
 lation of the A\^ord of God into so many languages 
 and dialects of the earth. Judson in Burmese, Gor- 
 don Hall and Xewell in Alahratta, AVinslow and 
 Spaulding in Tamul, Thurston and Bingham in Ha- 
 waian, Goodell in Armeno-Turki.di, Temple and 
 Kimi' in modern Greek, Bwinaton, Kin^^sljury and 
 Wright in Choctaw, AVorcester in Cherokee, I) wight 
 and Biggs in modern .Vrmenian, Bridgman in Chi- 
 nese, Schautflei' in Heln'ew-Spanish, Jones in Si- 
 amese, Perkins in modern Syriac, Hall in Ojilnvay,
 
 60 
 
 Grout in Zulu, Bryant in Grebo, Walker in Mpon- 
 gwe ; tliere was not one of tliese who did not remem- 
 ber and lienor their instructor as their chief quali- 
 fication for success when they prosecuted the diffi- 
 cult and invaluable service of rendering the Scrip- 
 tures into the lani^-uaees of the heathen." Somethino^ 
 bordering upon the romantic is there, that while 
 he, in solitary toil, was gathering from all the 
 dialects of the East whatever could elucidate the 
 inspired Scri23tures, his reward was to come when 
 men trained Ijy his wisdom, and inspired with his 
 enthusiasm, carried his name and influence back to 
 the Acropolis at Athens, to the isles of the ^Egean, 
 the valley of the Xile, to Jerusalem and Damascus, 
 the Tigris and Euphrates, to Ararat and Mesopota- 
 mia, and to the remoter lands beyond the Ganges. 
 "When the farae which is founded on pride, wealth 
 and aml)ition has faded away into nothingness, the 
 rio'hteous shall be held in everlastiuo- remembrance. 
 and the fruits of their laljor shall be reproduced 
 in interminaljle results. There is nothing in our 
 nature or relis'ion which inclines us to what, foi' 
 
 '" Tlii^, bv no means, compii-^-s all llie pupils of Prof. Stuart 
 wlio Lave dovotoil their lives to niis-ioiiarv labors — about one hun- 
 dred in mimbei'. I ha\e mentioned onlv such as rose readily to my 
 memi,iry, without eonsultini^ a catalo2'ue.
 
 61 
 
 want of a ])ettcr name, is so well understood in our 
 language by " Boswellism." But we trust that we 
 sliall never be unwilling to discover and li()nor true 
 excellence ; tliat no accidental defect or association 
 may render us blind to intrinsic and essential good- 
 ness ; and that we may always be 2:)rompt to re- 
 coo:nize those lights which God has kindled on the 
 earth, to assist our race in knowledge, virtue, and 
 religion. 
 
 When Philip Melancthon, that rare model of a 
 scholar, was near his end, he mentioned several things 
 on account of which, he felt that it would be a pleasure 
 for him to die. The one was, that he should escaj^e 
 the odium theologicuni ; the next, that he should be 
 refined and perfected from all sin ; and that in the 
 presence of God and the Lamb, he should find 
 a solution of those manifold mysteries of the divine 
 existence, al:>out which his mind had so lona' and 
 eagerly been eniplo}'ed. If we should add to these 
 the anticipation of meeting the good of all times, in 
 pure and perpetual fellowsliip, nothing, we believe, 
 could Ijetter express those sources of joy, which 
 made once the prospect, and now the fruition of 
 heaven, so delightful to the friend, wlio, in more 
 than one jiohit, l)ore resemblance to the accom- 
 plished Reformer. Xothing save sin itself, did he 
 so heartily detest as the prejudice, which, incapable
 
 62 
 
 of discerning real wortli, because of unimportant 
 denominational or pliilosopliical distinctions, repelled 
 and debarred the lionest and Christian believer 
 from heavenly catholicity. The gradations of 
 celestial joy, ^ye admit, are not measured so much 
 by intellectual attainments a- moral affinities. But 
 is there no ditlerence in that wr)rld of light, l)etween 
 a child of ignorance, though sanctified in atlection, 
 and a man whose mind is vigorous through di-^ci- 
 pline, expanded and alert by divine knowledge < 
 What joy must dilate the ransomed souls of ]\Iilton. 
 Howe and Ed^vards, as they comprehend in its 
 unity and harmony 
 
 '• tliat 2'reat eternal scheme. 
 
 Involving all,'' 
 
 which wa- the tlif/me of their life-long study. Conjec- 
 ture ha- given place to certainty : doubt to infallilde 
 conviction : and inystery to the l:)rightne-s (A' the 
 sun. It is a suldime joy we feel, whrn we f >llow 
 the spirit c-f our ven^-rated instructor to sueli an entire 
 and cloudless satisfaction : and think ui' his a<lmis-i'_)n 
 into the soci(:'ty of the lir,-t-born, whose n;imes wer*^ 
 his ailiiiiration, and works his <tudy while here on 
 eai-tli. \o jiagan dream ever yet conceiveil such 
 a divine >\'mpo-ium, as that which the Holy (dio-t 
 has promised to the good, at the marriage >uj)per
 
 63 
 
 of tlie Lamb. Better to converse there with tlie 
 old scholars, seeing eye to eye, than to atteraj)t to 
 understand them through the imperfect medium oi' 
 human language. Better to join the royal Psalmist 
 in the melodies of the upper temple than with dim 
 and wearied eye to study out the import of those 
 lyrics which he was inspired to write as the 
 " march melodies '' of the church on earth. Bet- 
 ter to stand with Isaiah and Ezekiel, with Daniel 
 and with John on the sea of glass amid the sul)linie 
 adorations before the throne, than to labor on throuo'h 
 wearisome days and nights to comprehend something 
 which the Holy Ghost intended in those visions 
 which shed unearthly splendor on the exiled pro- 
 23hets by the river Cliebar and the isle of Patmos. 
 Better, far better, to join with Paul, in the full ad- 
 miration and joy of satisfied intelligence, seeing as 
 we are seen, knowing as Ave are known, " Oh, the 
 depths, the depths of the wisdom and the love of 
 God," than to decipher out the alphabet and the 
 syllables of religion amid the impei'fections and mis- 
 takes of those who see in part, and know only in 
 part. To that society of the just made perfect, 
 death has of late been opening the door of admission 
 for many associated with theological science ; Chal- 
 mers in Scotland, A'inet in Switzerland, Xeandei' 
 in Germany, John Pye Smith in England, Alex-
 
 64 
 
 under and Stuart in America. By many precious 
 spirits lias tlie eartli been impoverished, and lieaven 
 enriclied. Tlie stars are sliinino' tliicker and thicker 
 in the firmament above. An easy transition will it 
 be for us, as we gain and exceed the meridian of 
 life, to pass away ; for the majority of those w^e 
 honor and love have preceded us, and the attrac- 
 tions of heaven are stronger and more numerous than 
 those of the earth. Borrowing aid from the exam- 
 j)le of others, and most of all from the Spirit of God, 
 may it be ours, T)e our stations obscure or honored, 
 to bless the world accoi'ding to that method pre- 
 scribed by our divine Lord, — "who would be great, 
 let him serve;" that when we die, to some we may 
 still speak in lives and labors of Christian useful- 
 ness.
 
 PROF. BEL A B. EDWARDS, D.D. 
 
 Just as the preceding pages were going to press, the 
 afflictive intelligence was received of the decease of this 
 distinguished scholar, long the associate, and recently the 
 successor, of Prof Stuart, in the Professorship of Sacred 
 Literature at Andovcr. So soon are Friendship, Learn- 
 ing, and Religion called to deplore a second and irrepa- 
 rable loss. 
 
 Prof Edwards was born at Southampton, Mass. ; gra- 
 duated at Amherst College in 1824, and at the Theolo- 
 gical Seminary at Andovcr in 1830. OfQclally connected 
 with the American Education Society, he conducted, with 
 great ability, the Quarterly Eegister, one of the most use- 
 ful periodicals of the country. In 1833, he established 
 the American Quarterl}- Observer, a publication which 
 reflects, in every number, his ripe scholarship, ample 
 charity. Christian patriotism and })hilantliropy. After 
 two years, the Observer was united with the Biblical 
 Eepository, then under the editorship of Prof Eobinson ; 
 and the joint publication was conducted by Mr. Edwards 
 until after his election as Professor of Hebrew in the 
 ^Vndover Seminary. In the year ISl-l, Prof. Edwards 
 and others issued the hrst number of the Bibliotheca Sa- 
 cra ; and to this invaluable publication did he contribute 
 his learning and labor to the end of his life. 
 5
 
 66 
 
 As a scholar, Prof. Edwards was distinguished by inde- 
 fatigahle diligence, accuracy and thoroughness. lie had 
 not a particle of pretence about him, lie was not one of 
 those whom Lord Bacon reproves for ^^ seeming wise."" All 
 was solid and substantial. The vastness of his leai'ning was 
 equalled oidv Ijy his singular modesty. Ili.-^ classmate in 
 the Theological Seminary, the Avriter can testify to the 
 wisdom of his early plans for a truly liberal and thorough 
 culture. He laid a deep and strong foundation, and every 
 day of his subsequent life added to his intellectual afflu- 
 ence. Beautiful was the enthusiasm of his scholarship, 
 and quick his sympathies with all which related to the 
 cause of letters and religion. The intensity uf his devotion 
 to the great pursuit of his life always made him calm and 
 sober; and so thoroughly was he imbued with a religious 
 spirit, that, although he was cut down in the midst of his 
 days, with large and cherished literary hopes unaccom- 
 plislied, we have no doubt that he fell asleep with the 
 same tranquillity which characterized his manners when 
 living. Lijng Avill it be before Christian Learning can 
 j)oint her disciples to a nol)ler model of diligence, zeal, 
 charity, purity. sim}ilicity and godly sincerity, than is 
 dis[)laycd in the truly useful life, and well-balanceil char- 
 acter, of Bel A Batks Eiavakijs. 
 
 Though the up-routing of these our ''trees of righteous- 
 ness " by tlie violence of death, is like those which .Ihieas 
 described in Thrace as followed l)y l/iood, we will not de- 
 spair as did the son of Anchises over an unfavorable 
 omen : believing as Ave do that cveiy drop of anguish 
 extorted by the death of men. whom our country knows 
 not how to sjnire, Avill prove the seed of a future growtJi. 
 the im}Mike to a nobler emulation and the promise of an 
 endless re})roduction.
 
 or 
 
 iBink nn& cDritntiil (r'pr. 
 
 G E E E K 
 
 r I c A 
 
 'El' do/i^ i]v b '/.oyoz,yiUi 6 /.oyoQ iiv tiqu; tov ih- 
 6v, ^(d ihoQ 7jV b Lay 02, Oiiroi ;/?' hv (^Q/ji ■^Q(K 
 TOV {hop. ITui'ra ()f- avrov iylvtro, y.ut ycooiz c<i'~ 
 
 S M A L L I' I C A . 
 
 i^v 6 )j'r/o,\ OiTO,' i]v h' UQ'/Ji nnh.; tov dtov. TIiuTa di' ulroi 
 r/trtTO, y.ai '/(oiji^' aitov r/titTO ovdt t'r, o ytyoity. 7..V aiTJ) Tco/, 
 
 L X (■ I' R r M K )i , NO. I . 
 
 ^Ep cloyrj 7;?' o /.oyoc. y.cd 6 Aoyog ?',P rrooc Tcv \}f6p. y.u) 
 Otiq i\p o /.oyoc. Oiioc I'p tp cloyj, ttooc tov Ofrop. Jhura 
 di^ carov lytvtio. y.ccl yMo'iz ccvioi tytpcro oidi tp. T y^yi>- 
 
 L X (' 1^ 1{ I M K K . X O . II. 
 
 Xoyo:. OiTo: ),r fV ('(Q/j'i ^Q( g Tor ihor. llmxu dt' uvtov fyiifiu. 
 xul /0)'n~ uiiov tyitno oi5i ti\ o ytyovii. IW uliCt ^oi/', ir, vau ?' «w/,
 
 68 
 
 GBEEK—Coniinued. 
 
 B O U R G E I S . 
 
 Ev aoxri Tji' o ).oyoq. y.ai o /o/o; r^v Tlinq xuv O^for. y.al &fr); ?,)' h '/.o- 
 yo;. Oirn:; 7j>' iv un/rj non^ Tor i9^foi'. Jlurra f3i aiTor h/fvnn^ y.al 
 ;Kti;o(; aiToi* iyf'rern oiSf tv, o yfyorer. Ev airi'i lo)ti t]i. y.ul ?; -ojr rt 
 
 B K E V I E K . 
 
 'Er ctrj^ri ijii b 'Xoyo;, Kal o }<6yos }]f -oCii tuv 6i6v, ki\ Oeoi r]v )o%o5. Ovroc pf 
 €V dnT(^^ ~ods rof Oiov. Ilti^ra 6i' airov iyii/iro, KnX yW'is av-rov iytvtro oici li,, o 
 yiyovtv. 'Ki' avToi ^f.)?; ^v, Koi i) ^oj'i vi' to Cjcoj tui' olpOo'-'j-oji' " k'ai to OcDj if rij uku- 
 
 P E S X I A X G li E E K . 
 
 S M A L L 1' I C A . 
 
 'Ev upxv V^ ^ Xoyo^. Kal 6 \6yo^ rjv rrpo^ top '^eov. Kal 
 '&eo? yv 6 Xoyo?. Ovro^ i]v ev apXV '^po^ "^ov ^eov. Uavra 
 Bl' avTov iyevero. Kal ^&)/3(? avrov iyevero ovde ev, o yeyovev. 
 
 L N G 1 ' K I M E li . 
 
 'Ev ('pXV 'P' ^ Xoyo;, Kat u Aoyo? 7)1' — pos rw Seov, Kal .^eos '//i' o 
 Aoyos. OiTO? -;)r cc "/j;(7] rrpos to:' -^£(;i'. IJarra ot avroi cyeVcTO. 
 Ktti X'^-'t-''-'^ avTov eyerero oiOc cr, u yeyoi ei'. Ei' aurco ^ojv/ 7)r, Kut 7/ 
 
 B U K f; E 1--. 
 
 'Ev npxV 11^ ^ Xtiyof. K(u 6 Xfiyof I'/u 77/Jus T(ii> 'cn'tv. kul ~eos yjv o Aoyof. 
 Oiror 7/1' e^' "pX'! ~i>"^ '''^'^ ^fov. YldPTu ol cutov eyivera. Kd'i )(coj)\s ai- 
 Tov (yiviTo albi eV, o ytynvev. V.v airw ^ojj/ ijv. Ka\ rj ^ccr) /))' nj (pis rJjr 
 
 B K E \' I !■: ); . 
 
 'Ev a.px]i I'lV (J Ao'/oy, Ka\ 6 Ao'yoj iji' ~pos tui> b^of. Kal Sxhs fji' o Kuyo',. 
 OSroy 'ffv iv dpx^i Trpoj rot' iyeih'. Xldi'Ta 5i' ai'ToC f^frera. Kal X'^'P'* ci^'ror tyf- 
 I'eTo ouSe eV, o -/iyitviv. 'Er auToi^ Ca'?) 7/1', Kal 7'? (.'017; i\v to does tu'V aybpu-rrui' •
 
 (')9 
 
 HEBREW. 
 
 G K E A T ]' K I M E K . 
 — : : " : — I •/ : t t : t ' •/ t t 
 
 "H; D^nbs ■^?2^<"J : G"^n "S^b^ Tzrr'J2 C'ribs 
 
 E X (i E I S II . 
 f V r t: I V t t *• ; . — t — •• • v: t t • •• ; 
 
 I> I C A . 
 
 nn-'H y\i<r\'\ :f"isjn nsi D'^'afn nx n^n'bx xna rrrxia' 
 "'3s-b:^ Jn£nn"a D^n'bx n^nn oinn ^:2-by tjirn^ ^nhi 'nn 
 Tii? D^n'bK iin;^] tnix-^n^ii nit? ^n^ n^nbs tcs^] id'^^gh 
 
 S M A L L ]' I C A . 
 
 c^ri'35* "irx*;] : s'^an "^is"^? 5^sn-,?o c'^r/px n'li .c-lnn ^:e-?:' ~wn' 
 ",13 c^fn'px ^j-is^i 3i::-''3 nixn-rj< dn'PX N";i^i ; "i"'J<""r!"" n-x -n-^ 
 
 B O U H C E I S . 
 (urnioiT POINTS.) 
 
 nm Dinn 'js^Sr 'i^'m mm .inn nn%n -p^xm 
 \n» D\nSN* noNn :D^t2n ^j£)"Sr nsnio D%n^N 
 
 MINI O X . 
 (without roiNTs.) 
 
 1:^-;" -rm '-z^ "nn nr,"'r; "-.x-' : -,--Nn r\- c^rr, rx s-rr'-x x-- r-zix-z 
 c-npx x-^T : — .x-TT^i ".-^x ^n- c^npx "-x^i : ::'^;cn ^:r-:r re-—: i-rirx r~- z:rr, 
 -jr-^pi si- -'X5 n-'nbx x-p"^! : "jrnn ■j^si -nxn y^i L'r'-a 5^2■^ z'-"-^z — xn-nx
 
 70 
 V, A B B I X I C . 
 
 S M ALL PIC A . 
 
 "Dt T' "'t^H ■irf'M : err 'rr-if? trp'?)' cdH pni cirp ':r"h 
 
 S A ^I A Pv I T A X 
 
 ^1:^171 :2A^^rn ^in^iA *^^^m ^^ii^s 
 
 t^^WiTl^ 'TOiTimt ^^^^'^^A 
 
 E T 11 I P I C . 
 
 r I c A . 
 
 (D-t^n : pffi : uap : -i- : '^iii : (D/Tiiij :: (d^iap : 
 •jfi: ^"iiiA-n: iTbC: (i)j?a: A"5ii.^ : AV^'5i : ^<:p*h: 
 ?ia: n-nih,: cp: (Drr^p: lii-p: -r'^: ^/lYi-: icfi: 
 
 (^ O P T I C 
 
 I)en Tj,p.;xi*^ "^ nCiJ-2^s ne oto^ rjcj-zi
 
 S Y 11 1 A C 
 
 G K ]•: A 'J' P 11 1 M ]•: R . 
 V v.. > .^, 
 
 
 .?>= 7 .7 "^ 7 7 > 7 > . OOO ., 
 
 a o o 7 ° \" 5'.0>i: 7 o O 7 7 
 
 ENGLISH. 
 
 XsIm ^ h.-rj\z ,_LiIlk ai;]']c5i '^i-^.Z^io \Xz.\ p3us 
 
 A R ABIC 
 
 ,s;^^ ^^ ' " -- ' - ^'"' 5 or -== - '^ =- .- - ^- 
 
 ^^-♦-ULxAi _ftXj "%£ LUli ^^^ Ujt ^yij (c-*^ '^^^ 
 
 S M A L L PI C A 
 
 ^j^-*-Uj;Ai -AXJ ^^ sSj3 ^ii! L^[ ^LiiJ ^Cj^ Jl:^.!
 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 Santa Barbara 
 
 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE 
 STAMPED BELOW. 
 
 Series 9482
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 A A 000 147 460 o