1 1 I V An English Grammar Z7 1" An English Grammar By John B. Wisely Head of the Department of Grammar and Com- position in the Indiana State Normal SchooK Terre Haute 2L<^ S3-^' Atkinson, Mentzer & Grover Publishers NEW YORK CHICAGO BOSTON DALLAS a.o(^~^S Copyright, igob By John B. Wisely P.iitcred at Stationers' Hall . I (mdon . PE \ \ \ I The Preface M UCH progress has been made in the last few years in the teaching of EngUsh. Old ideas and meth- ods have been thoroughly sifted ; text after text has appeared ; and the results of all this agitation are seen in better trained teachers, more natural and efficient methods of instruction, and a saner view of the entire subject. One by one \we have been trying out the facts in English, as w^ell as in other lines, and we are every day coming more surely to the conclusion that we must get back to funda- mentals. We have been growing gradually into the con- viction, that the pupils in the grades below the high school should have about two years of good training in English Grammar, that will ground them in the principles underly- ing the English sentence. Nothing less will prepare them for the subject of composition and nothing less will enable them to use English intelligently and effectively. In writing this book, with this thought in mind, the author has had presented to him two problems : I. The course in grammar for the grades must not con- sist in food for babes. The book has been written with the idea in mind, that below the sixth or seventh year, no at- tempt is to be made to teach technical or scientific grammar. All grammar, as such, is to be eliminated from this period ; and during the last two or three years of the course, the pupils are to receive a systematic training in the principles underlying the construction of the English sentence. This book, therefore, tries to present in a scientific way, those topics which are vital in the organization of the subject of grammar as set forth in the Introduction. [v] vi An Eiwlish Grammar &' Almost all phases of historical grammar have been omitted because that view is not vital in the organization of the subject, nor is it necessary to a v^orking knowledge of the science of the English sentence. It is thought that the pupil, at this age, has not a sufficient basis for such a discus- sion of the facts of grammar. The book, then, is an attempt to present a logical course in scientific, technical, descriptive, or formal grammar suited to the needs and capacities of pupils in the upper grammar grades. 2. The author's somewhat extended experience in teach- ing the subject in public and Normal schools, and his super- vision of others in the work, has shown him how very easy it is to make the study of grammar a bugbear, a deadening, verbal memory grind to children. This is not necessary. The subject of grammar may be made as interesting to the pupil as the subject of botany, and it may be studied in much the same way. We used to study botany, physics, chemistry, from the text-book as we have been studying grammar. Bacon, Agassiz, and others showed us the error of our way. To-day, in the study of botany, we study plants, using the text as an aid. In the teaching of physics and chemistry, the labora- tory is considered an essential. If the teacher of science to- day had to give up his text-book or his laboratory, he would, without hesitation, discard the text. It is thought that this same spirit of investigation, this same personal examination of the facts of the subject on the part of every pupil, ought to be introduced into the study of grammar ; and that the great variety of sentences ought to stand before the student of grammar, for his scrutiny and examination, just as the great variety of plants is made to appear to him by the teacher of botany. The purpose of the author in this book has been to pre- sent suitable sentences and to ask such questions upon them as will lead the pupil to construct the science of grammar The Preface vii for himself. To this end only such definitions, statements of facts, and explanations, as have been thought necessary to help the child to think his way through the subject, have been inserted. There is no need of committing to memory any law or principle of language from a text-book. All the facts of grammar are embodied in the sentence, and the pupil may study them at iirst hand, just as he studies the flower in botany or the rock in geology. Should he forget the rule, he has only to examine a few sen- tences and restate it for himself. Nor is the teacher asked to accept a single statement in this book. Grammar is not a matter of authority ; it is a thought subject, and if the teacher's thought on the materials here presented should lead her to a different conclusion from that stated in a definition, she should not hesitate to change the definition. There is no need to tell the pupil that the flower has so many petals and so many sepals, or to send him to a book to read it, says the botanist ; he can discover these facts for himself. Can he not also discover the uses of the sub- stantive clause? If he is able to see that the fish has so many spines in the dorsal fin, why can he not see that the noun has gender, person, number, and case? There is a close resemblance between this method of procedure in the language studies and that followed in the study of the natural sciences. True, no special laboratory, fitted up with tables, cases of instruments, or bottles of reagents, is necessary. The real unit of the subject, the sentence, is the material upon which we work ; the instruments are the minds of the pupils, constantly at hand, and never in the way. The work as presented in this text, then, is based upon the following thoughts : viii An English Grammar 1. That the sentence, as determined by the thought which it expresses, is the unit and subject of study in grammar. 2. That there should be a twofold purpose in the mind of the teacher who teaches it; namely, to make the pupils familiar with the principles which underlie correct sentence construction, and to give them skill in the use of the sen- tence as an instrument in expressing thgir thought. 3. That the method which should be pursued in studying the subject should be inductive, and might appropriately be called the laboratory method. Acknowledgment is due Miss Harriet E. Peet of the Forestville School, Chicago, for assistance in the prepara- tion of the work in Composition. For valuable criticisms on the manuscript and proof thanks are due Mr. T. E. Spencer of the Irving School, St. Louis, Missouri ; Mr. A. Jones, Marion Normal School, Marion, Indiana ; Miss Bertha L. Green, Lincoln, Nebraska; Mr. F. W. Nichols, Evanston, Illinois; Mr. F. E. Sanford, Lagrange, Illinois. J. B. W. Terre Haute, Ind., February 2, 1906. The Table of Contents The Preface v The Introduction xi I. THE FIRST SECTION : Chapter I. The Subject as a Whole i Chapter II. The Sentence as a Whole 9 II. THE SECOND SECTION: Chapter III. Classes of Sentences 26 Chapter IV. Classes of Sentences 35 III. THE THIRD SECTION : Chapter V. Thought Material or Ideas 43 Chapter VI. Words 51 Chapter VII. The Phrase 69 Chapter VIII. Modifiers 76 Chapter IX. The Organic Parts of the Sen- tence 91 Chapter X. The Simple Sentence 95 Chapter XI. The Compound Sentence 112 Chapter XII. The Complex Sentence 141 IV. THE FOURTH SECTION: Chapter XIII. Parts of Speech 190 Chapter XIV. The Noun 191 Chapter XV. The Pronoun 219 Chapter XVI. The Adjective 241 Chapter XVII. \erbs 263 Chapter XVIII. The Adverb 341 The Table of Contents r Chapter XIX. The Infinitive 345 Chapter XX. The Participle 356 Chapter XXI. The Preposition 366 Chapter XXII. The Conjunction 371 The Index 383 Introductory For Teachers Only THE ORGANIZATION OF THE SUBJECT 1. Both a Science and an Art. English grammar is that language study which has for its subject-matter the sentence. It is both a science and an art. As a science, it deals with the fundamentals of sentence structure. It makes known to the student the laws and principles which under- lie sentence construction. As an art, it aims to enable the student to acquire a skillful use of the sentence as an instru- ment in expressing his thought. These two phases of the subject are not inseparable. One may understand the science of grammar and not be able to use good English in conversation, and one may be very skillful in the use of language and at the same time know little or nothing about the laws and principles which govern correct sentence construction. If a person has been brought up in a family where he has always heard good English, if his playmates and those with whom he has asso- ciated have always used good English, then his English will certainly be pure, though he may know nothing of the rules of grammar. On the other hand, we have all known persons who could repeat rule after rule of grammar and vet could not speak correctly. 2. Mastery of the Art. As a mastery of the art side of grammar is an accomplishment which comes only through long and careful practice, it is essential that the teacher de- vote much time to this side of the child's education in Eng- [xij xii Inlroduclory lisli. His language will need the careful supervision of his teacher in all his work, and the pupil, himself, should be made to feel that he must keep a constant watch over his language in order to become proficient in its use. Eternal vigilance on the part of both teacher and pupil, is the price of pure English. The science of grammar will help, to some extent, to give the pupil the art; it will help him to judge when his sentences are correct, and to discover his own mistakes, but the use of good English must be acquired largely by prac- tice. 3. Value of Purpose. In teaching any subject, the teacher should constantly bear in mind the end to be at- tained. The teacher who sees clearly the end from the be- ginning will be able, for the most part, to select such means and devices as will accomplish this end. She will waste no time on side issues or irrelevant matter, because the pur- pose which she sees in the work draws her constantly toward that end and excludes everything which does not contribute to it. 4. Contribution to Character. If we say that the end of education is moral character, then the chief value of the study of grammar lies in that element which it contributes to moral character. Does grammar really do this? I think so. 5. It Deals With Mind. In the study of grammar, the pupil's attention is directed inward for the first time. It is the only subject in the common school course which re- quires the pupil to consider his mental acts as such. Here he stops to consider for the first time the nature of that for which the word, the phrase, the clause, the sentence stand. He deals primarily with the forms of pure thought, although in a very elementary way. This means that he gets some knowledge of the human mind ; he sees, to some extent, the delicate working, the marvelous powers of the human soul. Here he finds an op- Introductory xiii portunity for making distinctions and doing similar thinking to that which must be done in the study of psychology and logic. He does closer and stronger thinking than that re- quired in arithmetic or physiology, because the subject-mat- ter upon which he is working is more subtile. This work gives him an element of moral character which he can not get from the study of any other subject; namely, acute intellectual judgment, without which there could be no moral judgment and hence no moral character. For if the element of moral judgment be left out of character, if the individual be unable to make fine distinctions in ques- tions of right and wrong, strong moral character is impos- sible. 6. More Immediate Purpose of the Subject. But while this is the great value of the study of grammar, it is not the immediate end which the teacher keeps before her day by day. The result stated above is obtained only by keeping in mind the fact, that the sentence is the unit or sub- ject-matter of grammar, atid that all work in the subject has for its object: (i). To give pupils a knowledge of its structure — the laws and principles which underlie its correct construction, or the science of the English sentence. (2). To give the. pupils a mastery of the sentence as an instrument in expressing thought that will enable them to use it correctly — the art of the English sentence. 7. Characteristics of the Subject. In order to ac- complish these results, the teacher should bear in mind: (t). That grammar is a subject in itself, apart from all text-books on the subject, and if all the texts were destroyed, we should still have the subject of grammar. It has a cen- tral or organizing idea which binds together the facts of the subject and indicates their relations to all other facts of knowledge. xiv Introductory (2). That it is a logical or thought subject. It is not arbitrary and mechanical, but reasonable. (2)- That it is analytic and inductive and not synthetic and deductive, and should be taught according to the labora- tory method, as explained in the preface. The purpose of the discussion that follows is to make these three proposi- tions clear to the teacher and thus enable her to get above the common plane of ordinary text-book grammar work. GRAMMAR A SUBJECT IN ITSELF. 8. Related to Other Subjects. There is a body of facts which we call grammar. Can these facts be known scientifically, just as one would learn the facts of botany, or must the student be required to commit them to memory from a text ? This group of facts is related to other groups of facts. Grammar is related to the word studies of the lan- guage group. It is also a near relative of reading, composi- tion and rhetoric, and literature — those language studies which have discourse for their subject-matter. Grammar is the handmaid of logic. All its forms are determined bv and adapted to the thought they express. The relations which are found in the subject are logical relations and the true study of these facts is the study of the logic of the English sentence. Dr. C. C. Everett, of Harvard University, in his "Science of Thought,'' says: "Certainly, while logic de- rives such help from grammar, the reverse should be done, and our grammars placed upon a direct logical footing." g. Constructive Study of Grammar. When the stu- dent studies grammar in the light of the relations set forth above, when he sees it as based upon and growing out of logic, as a practical illustration of psychology, as conditioned by the word studies, and reading, and as preparing for and aiding in a mastery of the other discourse studies, he is studying the subject " constructively," as Dr. W. T. Harris says. Introductory xv Heretofore he has learned a great many of the facts of orthography, orthoepy, grammar, reading, composition, rhetoric, and Hterature, but these are somewhat fused to- gether in his mind and mixed, to some extent, with the facts of history, geography, and all other subjects which he has studied. Now he sees the language group clearly set off from all other studies, he sees the place of each study in this group, and he sees all of them in the light of the studies upon which they are based. 10. Facts of Grammar Related. But while the stu- dent is corning into a complete comprehension of the rela- tions stated above, he learns that the facts of grammar have certain relations to one another and to the subject as a whole. In the consideration of such a common object as the table, he has noticed that it is made up of parts, each one holding a certain relation to every other one and all together forming the whole. Without any one of these parts the whole would not be complete. In this case, he sees a com- mon idea, the idea of design or purpose, embodied in every part of the table and binding all the parts together into the whole. The table is to write upon and at the same time is to be ornamental, and every part and attribute of it, legs, sides, top, color, etc., embodies the central idea of the table. Why was the table not painted red ? Why are the legs all the same length ? Why is this bit of carving on the side ? Why is it made of hard wood? To answer any of these questions is to refer it to the central idea in the table. It will be readily seen that the student might take another view of the table. He might see it as a number of isolated parts, existing in space — a mere heap of material. What is the difference between this view and the first one? The parts are all in the second view. The legs, top, sides, etc., every bit of carving, all the attributes of the parts, color, form, etc., all materials are present. But the view of the xvi Introductory tabic is not the same as the first, because these parts are not seen in their relations. They are not bound into a whole by a unifvinof idea. 11. Two Views of Any Subject. It will be seen from the foregoing discussion that there were two phases or sides in this first view of the table ; namely, the part phase or fact phase ; and the relation phase or unifying idea. It is held that the relations existing among the facts of grammar are similar to the relations existing among the parts of the table with one exception. The relations exist- ing among the parts of the table are mechanical relations, and the whole is a mechanical whole, while the relations ex- isting among the facts of grammar are vital, and the subject may be shown to be a vital unity. 12. Two Points of View. Grammar, then, may be studied from these two points of view : (i). The student may consider the fact side, sentences in their great variety of form and many shades of meaning, together with the words which compose these sentences in their various uses in the sentences. These form the subject- matter of grammar, upon which the mind of the student is to be exercised. (2). The student may consider the relation phase of the subject. This is the central idea, which is found in some measure embodied in all the facts of the subject, and which binds them all together. The two points just stated are not two different subjects. They are the same thing considered from two points of view ; it takes both to form the science of grammar ; and any knowl- edge which leaves out either phase of the subject could not be said to be a scientific knowledge of grammar. 13. To Know a Subject Scientifically. Science, it has often been said, is organized knowledge. To know a thing scientifically is to know it in its relations. To know any subject scientifically, is to know the relations which exist Introductory xvii among the facts of that subject; to see the relation of each fact to other facts and to the whole by means of the funda- mental idea in tlie subject; and to see the relation of the subject as a whole to other subjects of study. This view of the subject cannot be gained by committing rules and definitions from a text-book on grammar, however good the rules and definitions may be. The student's mind must come into contact with the real unit of the subject, if he is to see relations. In short, the subject of grammar must be viewed as stated above in " (i) " and " (2) " : the facts and the central or relating idea. When one sees the sub- ject in this v.'ay, one may be said to have an organized knowl- edge of grammar. The sentence cannot say to the subject, " I have no need of you " ; nor the adverb to the verb, " I have no need of you " ; nor can grammar say to the most insignificant fact in it, " I have no need of you." For this body of facts which belong to grammar, being many, are at the same time one, by reason of a common idea which is found in all of them, and every one members one of another. 14. The Subject-Matter. It has been said that sen- tences in their manifold variety of form and many shades of meaning, together with the multitude of facts concerning them, which the student must know in order to understand how thoughts are expressed in sentences, form the subject- matter of grammar. The student is to combine this vast ar- ray of facts into an organized whole by means of what has been called the " relation phase," or " unifying idea." This unifying idea or central principle of the subject of grammar must be a general truth, because every fact in the subject must partake of its nature. It must be a primary truth, be- cause every fact in the subject is to be built into it. It must be a determining idea or relating truth, because, by means of it, all the facts of grammar are to be logically arranged or organized. xviii Introductory 15. The Central Idea. 'J'he only use of a sentence is to express a thought. How does the sentence express thought? The mowing machine expresses thought. By ob- serving its parts and how they all cooperate to do the work of the machine, one becomes aware of the fact that all this existed in the mind of the inventor before it was put into completed form. The mower is simply the expression of the thought of the designer. 16. The Nature of a Judgment. The sentence does not express thought in the v/ay indicated above. A judgment or thought is a mental act in which the mind asserts a re- lation between ideas. There are three elements in every such judgment : (i). The idea about which the mind asserts another idea, which may be called the thought subject. (2). The idea which the mind thinks with the first idea and which it affirms or denies of it. This may be called the thought predicate. f^). The relation which the mind asserts between these ideas, which is always one of agreement or disagreement and which may be termed the thought relation. I have in mind the idea, the cloud, and the idea, fleecy, but these do not form a judgment. I must see a relation be- tween the two. My mind must combine the two ideas into a unity in which I see the attribute, Heecy, as belonging to or forming one of the attributes of the cloud. In this way, my mind forms the judgment or thought expressed by the sentence, The cloud is fleecy. It is this triple unity which the sentence expresses, and in order to express it, the sentence must take on the triple form of the thought. 17. Three Parts of a Sentence. A sentence is the ex- pression of a thought or judgment in words. Why is it necessary that the sentence have the triple form of the thought ? Introductory xix (i). A subject, expressing the thought subject of the judgment. (2). A predicate, expressing the thought predicate of the judgment. (^). A copula, expressing the thought relation of the judgment. A picture expresses thought but it does not express thought as the sentence does. There are no three parts to the picture. It expresses thought by resemblance. Its form is determined by the form of the object which it represents. But there is no resemblance between the thought and the sentence which expresses it, such as exists in the picture. The thought is spiritual, subjective; the sentence is phys- 'cal, objective. The sentence is adapted to the thought for the purpose of expressing it, and is determined by the thought. Since the thought is not like the sentence and can- not be like it in any other particular, except in the number of its elements, the sentence, in order to express the thought, must take on the triple form of the thought. The thought imposes its form upon the sentence. It might be said here, that grammarians, while recog- nizing the fact that the sentence has three* parts, have not usually considered it of enough importance to make the dis- tinction, at all times, between predicate and copula. Since the thought predicate and thought relation are so frequently expressed by the same word, they have fallen into the in- accuracy of dividing sentences into two parts, a subject and a predicate. 18. Dr. Whitney on the Verb. The greatest linguistf * See Reed and Kellogg's Higher Lessons in English, beginning of lesson 29, Whitney's Essentials of English Grammar, p. 158, par. 353. " Our Langnage," p. 84. Lee and Hadley's Grammar, pp. 53-55- t The late Dr. William Dvvight Whitney, Professor of Sanskrit and comparative PhiloloL'y and instructor in modern languages in Yale College ; .niithor of " Language and the Study of Language," " Life and Growth of Language." etc. XX Introductory this country has known says : " The verb, be, in all its various forms, has conic to stand as a mere connective of assertion between a subject and some word or words de- scribing- that subject, and so to have no meaning of its own except that of signifying the assertion." And he adds, " Indeed, every verb admits of being taken apart, or an- alyzed into some form of this copula, he, which expresses the act of assertion, and a predicate noun or adjective (es- pecially the verbal adjective, the present participle), ex- pressing the condition or quality or action predicated. Thus, / stand is nearly / am erect, or, still more nearly, / am standing; again, They beg, is equivalent to They are beg- gars, or, They arc begging. In the above examples, each sentence has three parts. For example, in They are begging, the word. They, is the subject of the sentence and expresses the thought sub- ject of the judgment; the word, begging, is the predicate of the sentence and expresses the thought predicate of the judgment; and the word, are, is the copula of the sen- tence and expresses the relation which the mind sees between the thought subject and the thought predicate, or the thought relation of the judgment. Since every sentence must cointain a verb, it follows, that, if the above statement from Dr. Whitney is correct, every sentence may not only be separated into three parts, but must contain three parts, and no group of words can be a sentence or can possibly express a thought, if it lacks sub- ject or predicate or copula. 19. Psychologists and Logicians. In addition to the foregoing discussion it might be said that psychologists and logicians in all times and almost wdthout exception, have in- sisted that the sentence must have three parts corresponding to the three elements of the judgment. The inaccuracy, on the part of grammarians, has come about, as Dr. C. C. Everett, of Harvard University, points out, because they Introductory xxi have divorced grammar from logic. This is sure to lead to error, since the sentence is only an instrument for express- ing the thought, and grammar is directly dependent upon logic at every point. If one word contains two parts of the sentence, in which it occurs, that is all the more reason why the analysis of the student should be subtle enough to dis- cover that fact and to identify each part of the sentence with the element of the thought which it expresses. To express two elements of the thought in one part of the sentence would be confusing to say the least. 20. The Central Idea Stated. This fundamental at- tribute in the nature of the sentence, as it is determined by the nature of the thought, is the universal truth in the sub- ject of grammar. To put it in other words, the most gen- eral truth, the central idea, in the subject of grammar is: The three elements of the thought as they are accurately expressed in the three parts of the sentence. The student must see the sentence as the expression of the thought. It expresses thought in common with a great many other things ; the picture, the piece of music, the statue, all ex- press thought ; but the sentence is arbitrary, expressing thought in a particular way, by means of its triple form. The student must see this. This states the end and purpose of all the study of the science of grammar. Why does the student study the simple sentence or the declarative sentence? To see how the three elements of the thought are expressed in those lan- euaee forms. He wants to know how the sentence form which we call complex is adapted to express the thought. Why does he study noun and verb? To see what part they play in the expression of the three elements of the thought in the three parts nf the sentence ; to see how these lan- guage forms are adapted to the expression of the thought and how they are determined by the thought. 21. How Do We Know This is True? How do we xxii Introductory know that the principle just stated is the most general, and, therefore, the governing truth, in the subject of grammar? Because it is the truth which organizes the subject. It touches every fact in the subject and is the essential attribute of every such fact. It is the truth to which every question concerning the subject of grammar must be referred for its answer, just as every question concerning the table can be answered only by referring it to the central idea in the table. This central truth in the subject of grammar is the most general truth in the subject, because every other fact of the subject depends upon it. 22. The Value of This View to the Teacher. The value of this view of the subject to the teacher may be made clear by pointing out what the governing or central idea of any subject will indicate to the teacher concerning that sub- ject. The organizing truth of a subject will determine the following points with regard to the subject : (i). It will set ofif the subject-matter of the study from the subject-matter of all other studies. (2). It will indicate the logical order of topics in the subject. (j). It will determine the order in which the topics should be acquired or presented. (4). It will indicate the important and unimportant facts of the subject. (^). It will indicate the important and unimportant ele- ments in each fact in the subject. (6). It will test the definitions of the subject. fy). It will indicate the mental steps which the student must take to master the subject, and the materials which the teacher must put before the pupil in order to mduce his mind to take these steps. 23. The Central Idea Sets Off Facts of Subject. There must be some reason why mathematicians have grouped certain facts and called that group arithmetic. It Introductory xxiii is not mere chance riiat scientists include just the facts they do inchide in the subject of physiology and exclude all other facts. There is certainly some method by which gram- marians have been able to decide what facts constitute the science of grammar. It is the central idea in the subject which sets off the facts of that subject from all other facts. The central idea or organizing truth of the subject is the most imiversal attribute of the subject. Any fact possessing this attribute is a fact of the subject. Any fact which has to do with the accurate expression of the three elements of the thought in the sentence form is a fact in grammar. 24. It Indicates Logical Order of Topics. This or- ganizing truth is the most general or universal truth in the subject. Every fact is related to it. Some facts in the sub- ject are more closely related to it than others. The fact which stands most closely related to the organizing truth, is first in the subject ; one equally near in its relation to the central truth is coordinate with it ; one containing a less degree of the central truth is subordinate to both ; and so on with all the facts of the subject. When each fact is given its place in the subject, according to the relation which it bears to the central idea, the sub- ject is organized. This means that the order of dependence among the facts of the subject has been discovered ; the rela- tive importance of the facts and of the elements in each fact n'.ay be seen ; and the teacher sees the order in which the facts of the subject should be presented and why they should be presented in that order. 25. It Tests Definitions. The organizing truth tests the definitions of the subject. Every fact in the subject contains a certain degree of the general truth or universal attribute of the subject. To define any fact of the subject is to show its relation to the central idea of the subject. A definition of the noun which does not show its relation to the organizing truth of grammar, or which does not show xxiv Introductory how it helps to express the three elements of the thought in the three parts of the sentence, is faulty. 26. Organized Knowledge. When the student sees the central idea of the subject of grammar and all it indi- cates with regard to the subject, as set forth in the preceding discussion, he may be said to have an organized or scientific knowledge of the subject. He is free from text-books, except as he uses them as a means, and he sees the subject in the light of reason and in all its relations. Can the teacher be satisfied, or do mtelligent work in the school room, with a less comprehensive view? 27. A Criticism. The most severe criticism which could be pronounced upon grammarians and teachers of grammar is that made by Dr. C. C. Everett, of Harvard, when he says, they have divorced grammar from logic. And any one who has carefully examined our text-books in gram- mar, or observed thoughtfully much of the work done in our schools in this subject, must admit that there is some truth in the charge. The study of grammar has become largely a study of form ; a mere classification of words ; a kind of jugglery with symbols. What wonder that most boys and girls, with normal minds, hate it ! 28. The True View. But if, as Dr. Harris says,* " Grammar defines and fixes speech ; by its mastery man obtains the first mastery over his mind as an instrument. * * * It is the key to all that is spiritual. * * •* Grammar as etymology and syntax initiates the pupil into the general forms of thought itself. Thus there branch out logic, psychology, and metaphysics, as well as the various phases of philosophy. Has it not been said, indeed, that the father of logic discovered its forms through grammar? Under a thin veil the pupil deals with pure thought when he * See Report of Board of Public Schools, St. Louis, bound vol- ume of 1872-73. Introductory xxv studies syntax " — if this be true, then there is no lack of op- portunity for thinking in the study of grammar. The sentence is only the " veil " ; it is composed of mere words ; but this form has a content, the thought, and to un- derstand the sentence, the student must be able to separate, in thought, this form from its content. The student must constantly hold these two elements in mind while dealing with the sentence. When he considers the sentence. Glass is brittle, he views it as the expression of a thought composed of three elements : (i). A thought subject, the idea, glass. (2). A thought predicate, the idea, brittle. (^). A thought relation of agreement between the two. In the expi-ession itself, he sees parts corresponding to the elements of the thought : (i). A subject, the word, glass, expressing the thought subject. (2). A predicate, the word, brittle, expressing the thought predicate. (^). A copula or relational clement, the word, is, ex- pressing the thought relation. 29. The Two Elements. When he considers the word, soitr, in the sentence, The sour apple ripened rap- idly, he sees two elements ; first, the form or zurord, and sec- ond, its content. The word, sour, expresses an attribute which belongs to the idea expressed by the word, apple. So in dealing with the word, rapidly, he sees that it expresses an attribute of the attribute expressed by the word, ripened. Tn each case the student is required, first, to distinguish be- tween the form and its content, and second, to combine the two again to see how the form organizes itself around the thought and is determined by it. 30. Form and Content. This seeing of form and con- tent and the relation between the two cannot be too strongly emphasized. The failure on the part of grammarians and xxvi Introductory teachers to keep it in mind has given to the study of gram- mar its formal and lifeless nature. The study of the sentence from this point of view is no simple mental activity. It requires the most careful attention and very close and ac- curate thinking on the part of the student. He is first conscious of the sentence form, a group of words, and having obtained the thought which it expresses, he proceeds to analyze that thought into its elements. He finds that there are three principal elements in every thought ; a thought subject, a thought predicate, and a thought rela- tion, each of which may be composed of several elements. Finally, he associates each element of the thought with its corresponding part of the sentence, thus making the parts of the sentence, the relations existing among them, and their relations to the thought, to appear clearly. It will be seen that this is a complex activity, the student being re- quired to hold several points in mind, while he thinks his way carefully through the sentence. These two processes of separating form and content from each other, and each one into its elements, analysis; and combining form and content again into a vital unity, in order to see how the thought determines the form, synthesis, are tlie two fundamental processes in the mastery of gram- mar. 31. The Student Must Deal With Sentences. The principles already discussed would indicate, that in com- bining the almost infinite variety of sentences into the unity of a single principle, and in gaining the mastery over the sentence as an instrument for communicating thought, it is necessary for the student to deal not with text-books, but with this great variety of sentences. Text-books are helpful to him in proportion to the degree in which they put the sub- ject-matter of grammar, the sentence, before him in sucli a way as to help him to think it through for himself. But if all texts on grammar were destroyed, we should still have Introductory xxvii the subject-matter of grammar, the sentence, left; and the student might be led to construct the entire science of gram- mar from his study of sentences. GRAMMAR A LOGICAL SUBJECT. Now perhaps enough has been said to show that the sub- ject of grammar is a subject in itself ; that it does not depend upon text-books ; that the unit of it is the sentence ; and that every principle, definition, and fact of the subject is wrapped up in the sentence. The subject has an organization of its own, because it is a body of facts bound together, or unified by a central idea or truth, which runs through or in- heres in all the facts of the subject. But now I wish to discuss the second proposition. Gram- mar is a reasonable or logical or thought subject, not an arbitrary subject to be taken on authority. It is not to be bolted or swallowed whole. 32. Definitions and Principles of the Subject. The definitions and principles of the subject of grammar do not exi?t and thc\- arc not true, because Metcalf. or Sweet, or Whitnev has them in his grammar. These men did not make or invent the principles of our language and set them forth for us to commit to memory and follow the remainder of our days, nor could they, or any other men, possibly do so. Grammarians have discovered and stated the principles of language, and these principles are true, if they are true, not because they are in the grammarians' books, but they are in the books because they are true. 33. The Sentence an Instrument. The sentence is merely an instrument or means ; it is not an end in itself. The only legitimate use of a sentence is to express a thought. A sentence is a group of words which expresses a thought. This statement expresses the only true function of the sen- tence. One mind has a thought to be communicated to an- other mind ; the sentence is the vehicle of that thought. If XXV 111 Introductury there were no thoughts to be conveyed trom one mind to another, we should have no need for a senetnce. Since the sentence is an instrument or a means, it is like all other instruments or means in one particular ; that is, it is determined by that which it is to do. We may surely say of all instruments that they are made to suit the work which they are to perform ; that which they are to do determines them in every part and attribute. It would be ridiculous to think that a man would attempt to make a mowing machine without understanding the nature of grass, or the place in which it grows. He might make it so that it would run onlv on a smooth floor or concrete walk. 34. The Nature of an Instrument. Here is an instru- ment called the garden hoe. Why is its handle five feet long instead of ten feet long? Why is it made of wood? Why is it round and one inch in diameter instead of square and three inches in diameter? Why is its blade four inches wide and three inches long instead of ten inches wide and nine inches long? Why is it sharp? Is it not easily seen that it is the purpose of the instrument which determines these points? How could any man who knew nothing of the nature of plants and the soil in which they grow ; who did not know that weeds grow up among plants and must be cut out, and that the soil about the roots of plants must be stirred ; how could a man ignorant of the nature of the work which a garden hoe is to perform, make such an instrument ? And more, how could a person, ignorant of all this, under- stand the instrument? You are going along the street and you find a little wheel with tinv cogs. What is the first question you ask about it ? Why it is this: Where does it belong? What is its work? Is it a part of a watch or a bicycle, or what is it for? 35. How We Study an Instrument. If one did not understand the garden hoe, he might study it point by point. He might see that the handle is long so that one need not Introductory xxix stoop over too much in digging with the tool. He might see that the blade must be sharp so that it will cut the weeds and stir the hard ground easily, and so on. Each time he no- tices a characteristic of the hoe, he sees that there is some- thing in the nature of the work which it is to do that requires that characteristic in the hoe. When he has mastered it, he sees the appropriateness of this instrument to do its work, and how the instrument depends upon its work for its nature. Now there is nothing arbitrary or mechanical in the proc- ess by which the individual has mastered the garden hoe, if he has done it in the way indicated above. He takes noth- ing for granted and nothing on authority. He sees the cor- respondence between the nature of this instrument and the nature of the work which it is to do, and if forty authors had written text-books on the garden hoe, and every one of them had said the handle should be three inches in diameter and made of iron, he would not believe them. 36. The Sentence Adapted to the Thought. Now the sentence is like the garden hoe, in that it is an instrument, and has a work to perform ; namely, the expression of the thought. What does this mean ? It means that the sentence is adapted to the work of expressing the thought and that it is determined in every part and attribute by the nature of the thought which it expresses. It is just as necessary to understand the thought and its nature in order to understand the sentence, as it is to understand the garden in order to comprehend the garden hoe. 37. Logic and Psychology in Grammar. But one may say, then, how can you keep from teaching logic and psy- chology in grammar? No one who teaches grammar scien- tifically can keep logic and psychology out of his work, for grammar is dependent upon logic at every point, and the ex- planation of everv grammatical form involves the examina- tion of a mental process. The great difficulty is that gram- marians have divorced grammar and logic, in a great meas- XXX Iiitrodnclory ure, and this has given to the subject its lifeless and formal nature. It has made it a mechanical, deadening, memory grind, instead of an intelligent, healthful, life-giving, mental gymnastic. One might turn to any part of the subject of grammar for an illustration of the fact, that the sentence is adapted to the expression of the thought and is determined in every part and attribute by the nature of the thought ; that it is impos- sible to give any reasonable explanation of language forms without viewing them in relation to the thought which they express. And I wish now to illustrate at some length, this fundamental view of grammar. The entire subject of grammar falls into four great sec- tions of work : Section I. THE STUDY OF THE SENTENCE AS A WHOLE. 38. In the first Section of the work, only those at- tributes or characteristics of the sentence which are uni- versal are noticed. The student has as many different kinds of sentences as can be obtained placed before him, and in all this variety, he is asked to see the universal attribute, which makes them all sentences. He finds that some of these in- dividual exam^ples are long and some short ; some declarative and some interrogative ; some simple and some complex ; some inverted order and some natural order ; but one char- acteristic is found in each of them. Not every sentence is imperative; not every one has a compound subject; but they all have either explicit or implicit in them, the triple form, expressing the thought. 39. Unity. This fact enables him to unify this great variety of sentences and to see the unity in the thought of each sentence. It is not an easy matter for the student to grasp the unity of the thought in a long and involved sen- tence ; to see the thought subject and thought predicate, Introductory xxxi whicli the mind unites by an act of thinking into the triple unit}- — the thought, Avhich the sentence expresses. But this is what he must do if he ever masters the sentence, either as an instrument in expressing his own thought, or as a medium for obtaining the thoughts of others. 40. The Close of Section I. At the close of this phase of his study in grammar, the student should be able to take any sentence, distinguish between its form and content, an- alyze its content into its three essential elements, see the triple organic form of the sentence as determined by the thought, the relation of each element of the thought to its corresponding part of the sentence, and should be able to express the result of his thinking in some concise form such as the following: The large hook is certainly very cheap. This is a sen- tence, because it is the expression of a thought in words. The subject of the sentence is the words, The large hook, because they express the thought subject. The predicate of the sentence is the words, very cheap, because they express the thought predicate. The copula of the sentence is the words, is certainly, because they express the thought relation, or unifying act of the mind. 41. Do Not Make the Work Formal. It is not in- tended that the above form shall always be used by the student in expressing the result of his thinking. The chief thing is to have his mind perform the two mental processes of analysis and synthesis as indicated above, and any set form of expressing the result is rather to be avoided, as having a tendency to make the student mechanical and formal. 42. The Main Idea. Throughout this entire first sec- tion of the work, the student's attention is directed to but one thing — the universal sentence form as determined by the thought. He is not permitted to say that the idea ex- pressed by the word, hook, in the above sentence, is the thought subject, or that the word, hook, is the subject of xxxii Iiilroducfory the sentence ; but lie must see each clement of the thought and each part of the sentence as a unit. The idea expressed by the words, The large book, for that is one idea, though a complex one, is the thought subject, and all these words form the subject of the sentence. When the student is able to see in any sentence, each one of the three elements of the thought, which is expressed, and see it as a unit, no matter how complex it may be ; when he sees each of the essential parts of the sentence in the same way ; when he has combined the whole into an organic unity, in w^hich he sees the sentence as standing for or expressing the thought, he is ready to pass from the first section of the grammar work. 43. Careful Work. It will usually take considerable careful work with the student to enable him to do what is indicated above, but it is worth the effort, for the student who has this ability is forever free from mechanical or formal work in the subject, and is a long stride on his way toward the mastery of grammar as based upon logic. Section II. THE STUDY OF CLASSES OF SENTENCES. 44. In the second Section of the work, the pupil still deals with sentences as wholes, but he finds there are like- nesses and dififerences among them which enable him to classify them. 45. The Basis of Meaning. He notices that one kind expresses a phase of thought which appeals to the intellect. It communicates some information. Another kind also expresses a phase of thought which ap- peals to the intellect, but it inquires for information, asks for some element of the thought which is unknown and sought. Still another kind expresses a phase of thought which Introductory xxxiii stirs the emotions. Some information may be commu- nicated, but it is to the end of awakening feeling. Lastly, he notices that some sentences express thought which is intended to produce an act of will. So, on the basis of meaning, or phase of mental activity which is prominent, or power of mind addressed, or chief purpose, he divides sentences into the following classes : Declarative, Interrogative, Exclamatory, Imperative. 46. The Basis of Form. Some thoughts are simple in structure ; some are complex ; some are compound. The pupil will see that sentences must be of these kinds, also, since they express the thoughts. He, therefore, classifies sentences on the basis of form, as determined by the number and the relation of the thoughts expressed, into the following classes : Simple, Complex, and Compound. 47. The Close of Section II. When the pupil is able to view sentences, as determined by the thought, in the ways just indicated, he is ready to pass from the second sec- tion of the grammar work. Section III. THE STUDY OF THE ORGANIC PARTS OF THE SENTENCE. 48. Parts of the Sentence. In the third Section of the work; the study of the organic parts of the sentence is taken up. vSubjects of sentences are not all of the same kind. Some are simple, consisting of but one word ; others are long and complex. This requires a combination of words, for, however long the subject of the sentence may be, it must be a unity. This means that the pupil must deal with the words expressing the unified thought subject, just as he has dealt with the sentence, which expresses the unity called the thought. He must separate form from content; the extent and content of ideas present themselves to him ; and he sees the whole subject of modifiers growing out of this xxxiv Introductory distinction. He discusses the thought material or ideas, out of which thought suhjccts, thought predicates, and thought relations are made, and he sees how the words composing the subjects, predicates, and copulas of sentences may be unified, because of the ideas they express. He sees, for example, that in the sentence. The old arm-chair is broken, he could not say that the word, arm-chair, is the subject of the sentence, because the mind does not assert the idea, broken, of the idea, arm-chair; but of the idea, arm-chair, as changed by the ideas, the and old. 49. The Close of Section III. Thus, all the different forms which subjects, preilicates, and copulas may have, are seen to be adapted to the expression of thought subjects, thought predicates, and thought relations and determined by them. We have principal words and subordinate or modify- ing words in these parts of the sentence, because we have principal and subordinate ideas in the elements of the thought expressed in these parts of the sentence. Section IV. PARTS OF SPEECH. 50. Classes of Words. In the last Section of the grammar work, the student finishes the work for which he has laid the foundation in the Section immediately preceding, so that the last Section is to the third, what the second was to the first. In the third Section, he became familiar with the" different kinds of ideas, expressed by words ; namely, ob- iects of thought, attributes, and ideas of relation. On that JDasis, he classified words into the following classes : sub- stantive, attributive, and relational words. Two other kinds, he learned, were sometimes used without much mean- ing, merely to fill out the form of the sentence ; namely, ex- pletives and interjections. 51. Close of Section IV. Now, in the fourth Section, Introductory xxxv by observing likenesses and differences, he subdivides these classes of words, and thus arrives at " Parts of Speech." When the pupil sees the parts of speech, with all their prop- erties, in the same light in which he has seen all the other parts of the sentence, as indicated in the previous discussion, he has finished the fourth Section of the grammar work, and may be said to have fairly mastered the science of the subject. 52. Conditions of Mastering the Subject. This fourth Section of work can never be mastered, it will be seen, until the pupil sees clearly that there are distinctions in thought which give to the noun, gender, person, number, and case ; to the verb, voice, mode, tense, and so forth. If the action of the mind in dealing with objective things did not leave with it a notion of one or more than one, the noun never would have had that property which we call number ; and if it were not possible for the mind to think a relation between a thought subject and a thought predicate in past time, pres- ent time, and so forth, the verb would never have had that property which we call tense. 53. A Thought Study. This view of the subject makes grammar a thought study, not a set of rules and prin- ciples to be accepted upon authority — and committed to memory; but a thing which is logical and is to be reasoned out by the pupil. Tt is not a mere study of forms, but a study of forms as determined by the content which they express. GRAMMAR IS AN INDUCTIVE SUBJECT. 54. The Laboratory Method. Tt will be evident, I think, that the work which follows and constitutes the sub- ject-matter of this text, is arranged according to the prin- ciples set forth in this discussion and with this thought in mind ; that grammar, when properly studied, is an inductive subject, and should be presented according to what might appropriately be called the laboratory metfuxl. xxxvi Introductory 55. Compared With the Study of the Natural Sciences, If the scientific student wishes to make himself master of tlie mushroom, he goes out into the fields and gathers a speci- men of every variety. He examines the specimens carefully and tries to discover the common characteristics which make them all mushrooms. By the aid of his glass and knife, he finds out how the specimens differ and on the basis of the fundamental diiTerences, he separates them into classes. He takes advantage of the experience of other men, in work- ing with mushrooms, as they have recorded it for him in texts. By means of this experience, he verifies his own con- clusions. Often, by means of this experience, he finds that he has made mistakes in his work, and he returns to his specimens to examine them more carefully and discover his errors. When he has completed his work, he is an authority on mushrooms himself. 56. Grammar Can be Studied in this Way. Why can not the student of grammar study the clause in this way? He will not have so much difficulty in collecting his spec- imens as the student of mushrooms had. He will need neither microscope nor scalpel. He can see that each of his specimens has a subject, predicate, and copula, and is used as a part of a sentence just as easily, perhaps more easily, than the student of mushrooms saw the common character- istics of mushrooms. He can also see distinctions which will enable him, on different bases, to separate them into classes; as, substantive, attributive ; simple, complex, compound ; ad- jective, adverbial, and so forth. In short, the entire subject of clauses can be thought out from examples, just as the entire subject of mushrooms was thought out from the specimens, by the student. 57. The Teacher and the Text to Aid the Pupil. Tt is not held that the pupil in the grades can do this without the aid of the teacher and the text. The teacher will stim- ulate and direct his thought by proper questions and encour- Introductory xxxvii agement. The text will disclose to him the errors in his conclusions and send him back to study the examples more carefully. But when he is through with the subject, he will see all of grammar in the sentence and it will be a reason- able thing to him, not a set of dry, arbitrary rules. 58. The Difference Between Life and Death, The difference between grammar studied in this way, and tech- nical grammar as it is too often taught, is the difference between life and death to the student ; it is the difference be- tween an intelligent, healthful, life-giving, mental gymnastic, and a mechanical, deadening, verbal memory grind. The one process leaves him with the arbitrary technic of the sub- ject, a mere crust, which he loathes; the other makes him feel, as Dr. C. C. Everett* has said, that, " There is hardly anything more interesting than to see how the laws of gram- mar, which seem, at first sight so hard and arbitrary, are sim- ply the laws of the expression of logical relations in con- crete form." * See his " Science of Thought," a book which no teacher of grammar should be without, p. 82. Suggestions for Composition To communicate thought should be the dominant mo- tive of all composition work. A child's imagination should be stimulated before he is asked to write, and then, when the discourse impulse is upon him, he should be given an oppor- tunity to express his thought. After this expression he should be led to criticise his papers from the standpoint of an audience, asking himself if he has so expressed his thoughts that they could be easily comprehended by another person. The study of form should be brought in as a means to this end. The work in composition in this book aims to give the pupil, while working under the impulse of definite thoughts to express, practice in the forms of discourse natur- al to children of the grammar school age, and at the same time, to give them some knowledge of the technique of writ- ing- The work begins with tlie study of the composition as a whole, and then, by easy stages, develops the paragraph, the sentence, and the choice of words. The work is unified, its parts forming a natural sequence, but each part is, at the same time, complete and interesting in itself. The forms of discourse used are not those uf the col- lege rhetoric, description, exposition, narration and argu- mentation, which are seldom found in pure form anywhere, but those more natural to children, the review, the descrij)- tion as the word picture, the character sketch, and the storv. The rcvicz^f has been taken up first because, although it is the most difficult, it gives the pupil a chance to write away from the text of his book, and leads him to see that one valu- able thing in a composition is an honest expression of his observation and opinions. [xx.wiii] Suggestions for Composition xxxix The work in description gives the pupil an opportunity to be really creative. In this work he will see that fundamental thing, the possibilities of the sentence and, further, the power and beauty which comes through the use of simple figurative language. He will enjoy painting with words as much, or even more, than he does with colors. In the character sketch, some of the work started in the review and in description is carried on. It gives an excel- lent opportunity for that which is not strictly composition work, but which should not be lost sight of at any time, the defining of the ideals of character. The story gives vent to that most natural impulse, the narration of events. In it are studied the first elements of plot and dialogue. Unity and other things which made for clearness have been emphasized in the work in the review, beauty and vividness in the work on description and in story telling some things which make for interest. This work has per- force been very elementary. The subject matter used as a basis for the work is such as has stood the test of the critical judgment of many chil- dren. It appeals to their interests, is varied and good and yet popular. The method of the presentation of the subject matter and the technique has been the following : 1. The reading of a selection. 2. Questions to bring out certain kinds of thought. 3. Directions for writing. 4. A study in technique. 5. A method of criticism. This order is important, for by placing the study of technique after the expression of thought the cramping of thought for the expression of form is avoided. xl SHggestioii\s for Composition Many of the papers required of the children have been brief. QuaHty rather than quantity has been sought. Brev- ity and interest do away with the fatigue and discourage- ment which come to both teachers and pupils from pro- longed aimless writing. The work outlined in the book should be largely supplemented from other sources : the daily experiences of the children, current events and work in other studies. The review and character sketch work in well with the study of literature ; description with ge- ography, civics, science, and history ; and the story telling with all. ■■*«3!fe. THE WOODS IN WINTER (See page i88) An English Grammar The First Section * Chapter I THE SUBJECT AS A WHOLE Introductory. Purpose of the Study of Eng- lish Grammar. We think in language, and it is the most important means or tool which we use in communicating with our friends and other people. The mastery of it is, therefore, of the ut- most importance to every one of us. Skill in its use enables us to think clearly, to read under- standingly, and to speak and write with grace, ease, and force. There are several subjects of study which help us directly in obtaining a command of the Eng- lish language. English grammar is one of these, and it is therefore closely allied to our home life, our social life, and our school life. Do you know which of the following sentences are correct, and whv ? * Chapter One may simply be read carefully. It is preliminary. The real study of the subject begins with Chapter Two. 2 All English Granuiiar 1. I saw my friend, who T once thought would succeed in business, fail. 2. I saw my friend, whom I once thought would succeed in business, fail. 3. One of the children are going. 4. One of the children is going. Some of you may have to ask your teacher or some older person to tell you which sentences are grammatically correct, or if you do know which are correct, perhaps you may not know why. The study of English grammar will enable you to de- termine right and wrong forms of language for yourself, and to know zvhy they are right or wrong. How do you distinguish an educated from an uneducated person? When you meet a stranger, do 3^ou not judge him largely by his language? If he uses good English, and seems to be fairly well-informed, you decide that he is an educated person. If he uses poor English, you think he is illiterate. This method of judging people is often unjust, for many very well-educated people use in- correct English ; but people generally will judge you in this wa}^ The use of incorrect English, then, has a tendency to injure one's chances in life and to destroy one's usefulness. Besides, the English language is the mother tongue in this country and we should all have pride enough in it, and patriotism enough to learn to speak it, and write it well. The German people love their language. They enter into long dis- The Subject as a Whole 3 cussions to show that the German spoken at Court, or the German used on the stage is the purer form of the language. Why should not American boys and girls be proud of their mother tongue and desire to use it well? The subject of English grammar also forces us to think logically. There is no better subject to train the mind to make distinctions and to reach conclusions from the consideration of facts. It is, therefore, a means of education aside from its practical uses. I. The Literal Meaning of Words. We are often helped to understand a subject by discovering the literal meaning of the word that names it. To obtain the literal meaning of a word, we must: 1. Find the language from which it is derived; as, Greek, Latin, French, or whatever it may be. 2. Obtain the parts of the word in the language from which it is derived. 3. Find the meaning of each part in the lan- guage from which the word is derived. 4. Then summarize, or put the meaning of these parts together. This gives the literal or original meaning of the word. To illustrate, we may take the word, definition. In our study of grammar, we shall be constructing and dealing with definitions of many different top- ics; as, subject, predicate, noun, case, and voice. It 4 Ati English Grammar is well that we should know what a definition is and what we must do to form one properly. The literal mcanin,<4- of the word gives us some light upon this. The word, definition, comes from the Latin, de, meaning around, ahout, from ; finire, meaning to bound, to limit, to separate; and tion, meaning the act of. Literally, then, the word means the act of bounding about, limiting around, or separating from. Now this is just what we do when we de- fine a thing properly. We bound it about, sep- arate it from everything else, or draw a line men- tally around it. The literal meaning of words may be obtained from any modern dictionary. In "The Interna- tional " it will usually be found the first thing under the word. In "The Standard" it follows the defi- nition of the word. 2. The Marks of a Good Definition. To form an accurate, logical definition of a thing, we must do three things : 1. Name the thing to be defined. 2. Put it into the smallest known class. 3. Give the marks, characteristics, or attributes which set it off or distinguish it from all other mem- bers of that class. To illustrate, we may take the definition of an island. An island is a small body of land sur- rounded by water. When we say, an island, we The Subject as a Whole 5 have named the thing to be defined. When we say, is a small body of land, we have put it into the small- est knov^^n class. When we say, surrounded by zvater, we have given the mark, characteristic, or attribute which separates it from all other members of its class or all other small bodies of land, such as, the cape, promontory, and isthmus. We must name the thing to be defined, in giving a definition, in order to get it clearly before the mind. It is better to put it into the smallest class because that gives us more information about it and also leaves us fewer individuals or members from which to distinguish it. In defining the horse, for example, we ma}' put it into the class animals or we may put it into the class quadrupeds. It is much better, however, to put it into the smaller class, quadrupeds, for that gives us more informa- tion about it ; for example, that it is four-footed. It also makes the third step in the definition easier, for we do not then have to distinguish it from bipeds, but only from other quadrupeds. But we must put the thing to be defined into a known class whether that class be large or small, because the mind immediately gives to the thing to be defined the attributes of the class into which we put it. If the class be unknown, the mind can have no attri- butes to give to the thing to be defined. It does not help us to put the thing to be defined into an un- known class. We should test all our definitions by these requirements. 6 An En^IisJi Grammar i^' 3. The Place of Grammar in the Language Group. Grammar belongs to that group of sub- jects which we call language studies because it deals with or has for its subject-matter one phase of language. Any subject which deals with lan- guage, or has language for its subject-matter or unit, is a language study. Geography is not a lan- guage study because it deals with or has for its sub- ject-matter or unit the facts and phenomena of the earth. The other subjects of this group of language studies which we study in the public schools are: literature, rhetoric, reading, composition, orthog- raphy, orthoepy, and word analysis. Orthography, orthoepy, and word analysis deal with or have for their subject-matter that unit of language which we call the word. Composition, rhetoric, reading and literature deal with or have for their subject-matter that unit of language which we call discourse. Grammar deals with or has for its subject- matter that unit of language which we call the sentence. We might think, on first thought, that when we are studying " parts of speech " the unit with which we are dealing is the word. A little thought will show us, however, that, although we are studying words, the word is not the unit. If we ask what part of speech the word, fine, is, we are unable to tell until we see it in a sentence. If we say, It is a The Subject as a Whole 7 ■fine day, the word, fine, is an adjective. In the sen- tence, TJte fine was remitted, the word, fine, is a noun. While in the sentence, / fine you ten dollars, the word, fine, is a verb. Thus we see that we can- not even tell what part of speech a word is until we see it in a sentence. If we want to know the case of the word, pen, we cannot tell until we see the word used in a sen- tence. In the sentence. My pen is nezv, the word, pen, is in the nominative case, while in the sen- tence, I fiold my pen, the word, peit, is in the object- ive case. Much more might be said to show that whenever we are dealing with words in the subject of grammar, the sentence is still the unit. We deal with words in grammar only as parts of sentences. In fact, the name '* parts of speech," implies that there is a whole of speech. The whole of speech in grammar is the sentence. 4. The Distinguishing Mark of Grammar. The distinguishing mark of grammar, then, is that it has for its subject-matter or unit the sentence. No other language study deals with the sentence in this way, or has the sentence for its subiect-matter or unit. 5, Grammar Defined. Grammar is that lan- guage study which has for its subject-matter or unit the sentence. Test this definition and all your definitions by the marks of a true definition, as (liven in Section 2. S' An Ens.lish Grammar fc.' 6. Outline of the Language Studies. An out- line of the language studies, showing the place of grammar among them, is as follows: I. Definition. A language study is a study that has for its subject-matter or unit some phase of language; as, composition. II. Classes- of language studies on the ba- sis OF THE unit dealt WITH. Class A. Dealing ivith Discourse. 1. Composition and Rhetoric. 2. Reading. 3. Literature. Class B. Dealing zidth the Sentence. I. Grammar. Class C. Dealing zmth the Word. 1. Orthography. 2. Orthoepy. 3. Word Analysis. Chapter II THE SENTENCE AS A WHOLE 7. The Sentence Defined. If a person meets you on the street and says, "" The tall green tree/' your mind is not satisfied ; you have no complete con- ception. You have an idea, hut your mind naturally thinks, "Well, what about 'The tall green tree' f" Your mind is satisfied when the person says, '' The tall green tree was blown down by the storm." This last group of words we call a sentence be- cause it expresses a thought; the first group of words is not a sentence because it does not express a thought. A sentence is a group of words which ex- presses a thought ; as, A soldier must be brave. Exercise i Tell which of the follozving groups of words are sentences and zvhich are not. Change the groups of words zvhich are not sentences into sentences by adding words to them: 1. The child in the window. 2. The picture hanging on the wall. 3. The sun is hot. 4. The sun shining in at the window. 5. The girl who tries to paint. [9] 10 A}i English Grammar 6. The streets are icy. 7. The large star shining in the west. 8. The large star. 9. The large star shining in the west is Venus. 10. The large -chair occupied by my father. Write five sentences about objects which you can see in the room. Write five groups of zuords which are not sentences. Change these into sen- tences by adding words to them. Write statements showing hozu the first groups differ from your sen- tences. 8. The Thought and the Sentence. The defi- nition of the sentence shows us that it is only an instrument to express the thought. The thought is the important thing; the sentence exists for it. If it were not for the thought, we should never need a sentence. This must be true because every in- strument depends upon or is determined by the work which it is to do. Take the garden hoe, for example. It is an in- strument. It is made to suit the work which it is to do. Every part and attribute of it depends upon the work which it is to perform. Any question we may ask about it must be answered by the nature of the work which it is to do. Why is the handle five feet in length instead of two? If the handle were only two feet long, one would have to stoop too much in using it. Why is the blade made of metal instead of wood? It must stand hard knocks to The Sentence as a Whole il break the clods and stir the soil. Why is the blade sharp ? It must cut weeds. We see that everythino: about this instrument is adapted to the work which it is to do. In the same way, the sentence is adapted to the expression of the thought. A person could not un- derstand the garden hoe unless he knew about the garden and plants, how they grow, and that they must be cultivated. Nor can a person understand ihe sentence — the instrument for expressing the 1 bought — until he understands something about the thought. 9. The Thought Defined. If we think of that which the word, roses, expresses, we have an idea. That which the expression, red roses or large red roses, expresses is still an idea, though it is more complex than the idea, roses. The group of words, large red roses grozving by the zvindow, expresses only one idea, though it is much more complex than any of the other ideas just mentioned. Any one of these ideas is a complete mental- act, but it is not a thought. If we think of that which the words, roses fragrant, or roses growing, express, we still have only ideas. In this case we have two ideas, that expressed by the word, roses, and that expressed by the word, fragrant, or ih.'il expressed by the word, roses, and that ex- pressed by the word, grozving. We do not know whether the ideas, fragrant and grozving, belong to 12 An English Grammar i>' the idea, roses, or not. Other things are fragrant and other things perform the act of grozuing. The expression, roses growing, does not express a thought, then, but only two ideas. In order to make a thous^ht out of these two ideas the mind must assert a relation between them. It must assert that the idea, growing, belongs to the idea, roses, or else it must assert that the idea, growing, does not belong to the idea, roses. If we express this first assertion by means of words, we must have one more word than we have yet used ; as, Roses are growing. If we express the second assertion, we must have two more words ; as, Roses are not grow- ing. This shows us how the mind thinks a thought and what is necessary to the thought. If the mind wishes to think a thought, it begins with some idea about which it can assert another idea; as the idea, stars. Then it thinks some attribute or group of attributes; as the idea, twinkling. This does not form a thought. To form a thought the mind must in the third place assert a relation between the idea, stars, and the idea, twinkling. Let us say that, in this case, it asserts the relation, that the idea, twinkling, belongs to the idea stars. This gives it the thought. Stars are twinkling. The mind performs all these activities so quickly that we do not realize that it has taken these three steps; but, when we analyze the thought carefully, we see that the mind must perform these three acts The Sentence as a Whole 13 or take these three steps every time it thinks a thought. No thought can be formed by the mind with fewer than these three elements: 1. An idea about which the mind asserts an- other idea. 2. An idea which the mind asserts concerning the first idea. 3. The relation between the two ideas. What, then, is a thought or judgment? A thought is a mental act in which the mind asserts a relation between ideas; as, Snow is zvhite. The thought is the mental act, Snozv is white. What is an idea? An idea is a mental act which may form an element or part of a thought, such as is expressed in the sentence. Gold is valua- ble. The idea is the mental act, gold or valuable or is. Exercise 2 Think of eight or ten things in your school room; such as, pictures, -flowers, and maps. Begin with these ideas; think other ideas which your mind can assert about these ideas; make the assertions, thus forming th ough ts. Shozv hozu the mind has constructed the thoughts expressed by the following sentences by pointing out the three steps in the thoughts: 1. Flowers arc blooming. 2. Grass is growing. 3. Birds are singing. 4. Streams are flowing. ^ly 14 All English Grammar 5. Coal is black. 6. Ice is cold. 7. Rain is falling. 8. Sugar is sweet. 9. Apples are ripe. 10. Pinks are fragrant. 10. The Thought and the Sentence Com- pared. The differences between the thought and the sentence brought out in the last two sections are very important. They may be summed up as follows : The Thought. 1. The thought is a mental act. 2. The thought is a group of related ideas. 3. The thought is the end. 4. The thought is subjective, inside, in the mind. 5. The thought cannot be known through the senses. We cannot see it or hear it or touch it. The Sentence. 1. The sentence is the ex- pression of a mental act. 2. The sentence is a group of related words. 3. The sentence is the means or instrument, not the end. 4. The sentence is objective, outside, on the board or in the book, or in the air if spoken. 5. The sentence can be known through the senses. We can see it, hear it and touch it. II. The Elements of the Thought. From what we have already learned about the thought, we can see that every thought must contain three elements. In the thought, The ants are busy, the The Sente-nce as a Whole 15 mind begins with the idea, The ants. That is the idea about which it thinks or asserts another idea. Then the mind thinks, in connection with it, the idea, busy. It holds the two up together, as it were, for comparison. Third, the mind sees the agree- ment between these ideas and asserts that the idea, busy, belongs to the idea. The ants. This third element is the relation between the first idea, The ants, and the second idea, busy. In the thought. Flowers bloom, we have these same elements. The first idea is the idea. Flowers. The second idea, which the mind holds up with this idea for comparison, is the idea, bloom. The third idea or element is that this idea, bloom, belongs to or this act is performed by the idea, Flowers. The mind cannot think a thought with fewer than these three elements, and no thought can contain more than these three elements. Exercise 3 In the thoughts expressed by the follozving sen- tences, point out the three elements: 1. Elephants are powerful. 2. Walking is pleasant. 3. Some books are interesting. 4. M^en think. 5. Rain falls. 12. The Elements of the Thought. The first idea in the thought, the idea with which the mind begins, may be called the thought subject. 16 An English Grammar The second idea in the thought, the idea which the mind compares with the first idea, may be called the thought predicate. The third idea in the thought, the relation between the first and the second ideas, may be called the thought relation. The thought subject is the idea about which the mind asserts another idea. In the thought, The fog is rising, the thought subject is the idea. The fo9\ The thought predicate is the idea which the mind asserts of the thought subject. In the thought, The fog is rising, the thought predicate is the idea, risin g- The thought relation is the relation which the mind asserts between the thought subject and the thought predicate. In the thought, The fog is ris- ing, the thought relation is that the idea, rising, or the thought predicate, belongs to the idea, The fog, or the thought subject. This thought relation is expressed by the word, is. The mind does not always assert that the thought predicate belongs to the thought subject. It may assert that the thought predicate does not belong to the thought subject ; as. This paper is not clean. In this thought, the mind asserts that the thought predicate, the idea, clean, does not belong to the thought subject, the idea, This paper. This fact gives us two kinds of thought rela- tions ; one in which the mind asserts that the thought predicate belongs to the thought subject and one in The Sentence as a Whole 17 which the mind asserts that the thought predicate does not belong to the thought subject. We call the first a relation of agreement. We call the second a relation of disagreement. Exercise 4 In the thoughts expressed by the following sen- tences, tell zi,'hicJi has a relation of agreement and which a relation of disagreement: 1. Iron is heavy. 2. My pencil is not long. 3. My pen is not good. 4. Jonathan was faithful to David. 5. The lesson was not difficult. Write Hvc sentences expressing relations of agreement and five which express relations of dis- agreement. The mind may see tliat the thought predicate is a part or an attribute of the thought subject; as, The man is charitable. The snn shines. Or it may see that the thought subject is an individual or a class of individuals, and that the thought predicate is an individual or a class of individuals, and that the attributes of the thought predicate belong to the thought subject; as, Monroe was a statesman. Violets are plants. These men arc natives. The Mis- sissippi is the father of waters. When the mind as- serts any of these relations between the thought subject and the thought predicate, we call it a relation of agreement. 1^ An English Graiinnar But the mind may assert just the opposite of this relation. It may assert that the thought pred- icate does not belong to the thought subject or that the attributes of the thought predicate do not be- long to the thought subject; as, The man is not charitable. The sun does not shine. Monroe was not a statesman. Violets are not minerals. These men are not natives. The Missouri is not the father of waters. When the mind asserts any of these relations between the thought subject and the thought pred- icate we call it a relation of disagreement. 13. The Thought Analyzed. We may then analyze a thought or judgment as follows: Web- ster, the statesman, zvas a great lawyer. The thought is the mental act, Webster, the states- man, was a great lawyer, because it is a mental act in which the mind asserts a relation between ideas. The thought subject is the idea, Webster, the statesman, because it is an idea about which the mind asserts another idea. The thought predicate is the idea, a great lawyer, because it is the idea which the mind asserts of the thought subject. The thought relation is one of agreement because the attributes of the thought predicate belong to the thought subject. Exercise 5 Analyze the fh oughts expressed by the follozving sentences: TJie Sentence as a Whole 19 1. The climate of California is mild. 2. The snow was melting from the mountains. 3. The flowers were springing up everywhere. 4. Chaucer was the father of English poetry. 5. Tobacco is harvested in the latter part of August. 6. We camped on Moosehead lake. 7. The boys rowed the boat down the stream. 8. The cave was very damp. 14. The Parts of the Sentence. We have now seen that the thought alway.s consists of three elements ; that the sentence is the instrument for expressing the thought ; that the instrument is al- ways adapted to the work which it is to do; and that the sentence is, therefore, adapted to the thought. The sentence must then have three parts corresponding to or expressing the three elements of the thought. If you will refer to Section 10, you will see that this is the only way in which the sen- tence and the thought are alike. The thought has three elements; the sentence has three parts. This is the only way they can be alike. That part of the sentence which corresponds to or expresses the thought subject we call the sub- ject of the sentence. That part of the sentence which corresponds to or expresses the thought pred- icate we call the predicate of the sentence. That part of the sentence which corresponds to or ex- presses the thought relation, we call the copula of the sentence. In the sentence, Dark clouds were overhead, the 20 An English Grammar &' subject of the sentence is tlie words, Dark clouds, because they express the thought subject. The predicate of the sentence is the word, overhead, be- cause it expresses the thought predicate. The cop- ula of the sentence is the word, were, because it ex- presses the thought relation. 15. The Parts of the Sentence Defined. A¥e may then form the following definitions: 1. The subject of the sentence is the word or group of words which expresses the thought sub- ject; as, in the sentence, Milk is zvhite, the subject is the word, Milk. 2. The predicate is the word or group of words which expresses the thought predicate; as, in the sentence, Storms are fright fid, the predi- cate is the word, fright fid. 3. The copula is the word or group of words which expresses the thought relation; as, in the sentence. The righteous man is exalted, the copula is the word, is. 16. Why Every Sentence in the English Lan- guage Must Have These Three Parts. Every person who wishes to master the English sentence should know, first of all, the following facts : I. The verb, he, in all its forms, he, am, is, are, art, zvas, zvast, zvere, wert, and beejt, is the only pure verb in the English language. Note : Section 16 may simply be carefully read at first. Tn con- nection nith the study of the pure verb, return to it for more care- ful consideration. The Sentence as a Whole 21 2. We mean by saying it is the only .pure verb that it is the only verb in the English language which always expresses the thought relation and never expresses anything else. The verb, be, with its modifiers and auxiliaries, if it has any, is always the copula of the sentence, and never anything else. It and its modifiers are never a part of the predicate of the sentence. At one time in the history of the language, the verb, be, had the power to express an attribute. It then meant exists. The sentence, God is, at the time at which it was written, meant, God exists. We do not so use this verb now. It has lost all power to express an attribute, and has now come to be used as a mere connective or copula between the subject and the predicate. Whenever we find any form of this verb in the sentence, then, we may be sure that it, with its auxiliaries and modifiers, if it has any, is the copula of the sentence. 3. Sometimes other verbs, such as, become, grow, get, turn, refiiain, continue, stay, seem, ap- pear, look, sound, smell, feel, stand, sit, go, and move, are used in the sentence with the force of a pure verb; as. The field looks green. The child feels sick. In such cases these verbs are the copulas of the sentences. But these verbs are not always used in this way. 4. Every other verb in the English language may be expanded into some form of the verb, be, and another word, usually the present participle, 22 An Encrlish Grammar &' which expresses the attribute or thought predicate or the principal part of the thought predicate; as, /. They beg is ec[ual to Tliey are beggars or They are begging. 2. They may write is equal to They may be writing . J. He must go is equal to He must be going. 4. She does study is equal to She does be study- ing. 5. We do insist is equal to IVe do be insisting. 6. The hoy Jiad gone is equal to Tlie boy had been going. /. They have studied is equal to They have been studying. 8. His brotJier zvill have departed is equal to His brother will have been departing. In the above sentences the part in black faced type in each case is the copula. It is clear, there- fore, that every sentence in the English language not only may have three parts, but every sentence must have, either actually in it or implied in it, these three parts: subject, predicate, and copula. To say that a sentence has three parts, however, is not the same as to say it has three words in it. Sometimes, as we have just seen, one word per- forms two offices in the sentence. In the sentence, They beg, the word, beg, expresses the thought re- lation and the thought predicate. Thus it performs two offices in the sentence, or stands for two parts of the sentence. These two parts of the sentence The Sentence as a Whole 23 may be shown by expanding the word, heg, into its equivalent expression, are beggars, or are begging. Now the sentence has three visible or audible parts, They are begging. A sentence may have only one visible or audible part; as, March. Yet this sen- tence contains three parts, for there is a subject un- derstood, the word, yoti. The sentence means, You march. Then the word, march, performs two of- fices. It expresses the thought relation and the thought predicate and may be expanded into the expression, be marching. The sentence, March, tlien really means. You be marching, and in this we have three visible or audible parts. No matter how many or how few words a sentence may contain, it is always made up of three parts: subject, predi- cate and copula. Exercise 6 Analyze the thoughts expressed by the following sentences, by giving the thought subject, the tJiought predicate, and the thought relation of each, with the reason in each case. Then analyze the sen- tences by giving the subject, predicate, and copula of each, zvith a reason in each case. Let your lan- guage in the analysis show clearly the distinction betzveen the sentence and the thought. To make tJiis point clearer, let us analyze these sentences: Model for the Analysis of the Thought. /. The Kin^ was silent. The thought is the mental act, The King was 24 An English Grammar silent, because it is a mental act in which the mind asserts a relation between ideas. The thought subject is the idea, The King, because it is the idea about which the mind asserts another idea. The thought predicate is the idea, silent, because it is the idea which the mind asserts of the thought subject. The thought relation is one of agreement because the thought predicate belongs to the thought subject. Model for the Analysis of the Sentence. //. The King was silent. The sentence is the group of words. The King was silent, because it is a group of words which expresses a thought. The subject of the sentence is the words, The King, because they express the thought sub- ject. The predicate is the word, silent, because it expresses the thought predicate. The copula is the word, was, be- cause it expresses the thought relation. ///. Columbus discovered America. The sentence is the group of words, Columbus discov- ered America, because it is a group of words which expresses a thought. The subject of the sentence is the word, Colum- bus, because it expresses the thought subject. The predicate is the words, discovered America, because they express the thought predicate. The copula is implied in the word, dis- covered. If it were expanded, it would be zvas discovering. The copula is then the word, was, because it expresses the thought relation. Sentences To Be Analyzed. 1. The Puritans were strict. 2. Coal is a mineral. 3. My uncle's farm is fertile. The Sentence as a Whole 25 4. We enjoyed a moonlight sail. 5. Coasting is dangerous. 6. The natives enjoy climbing mountains. 7. A prairie fire is an impressive sight. 8. The village street leads past the church. 9. The Van Tassel homestead was not large. 10. A New England kitchen has a thrifty appearance. Review Read each sentence in the following paragraph and think the thought expressed by it. Give the three elements of the thought. Give the three parts of the sentence. This was to be our visiting day. The next that came was Mr. Burchell, who had been at the fair. He brought my little ones a pennyworth of gingerbread each, which my wife undertook to keep for them, and give them by letters at a time. He brought my daughters also a couple of boxes, in which they might keep wafers. snufT, patches, or even money when they got it. My wife was unusually fond of a weasel-skin purse as being the most lucky ; but this by the by. — Goldsmith. TJic Second Section Chapter III CLASSES OF SENTENCES 17. On the Basis of their Meaning or Chief Purpose. Sentences are used to awaken thoughts in the mind. Whenever, you use a sentence, you wish to produce some effect upon another mind. Exainine the following sentences to see if you can state the chief purpose of each. What would you expect to accomplish zvith them? 1. London is the largest city in the world. 2. Is London the largest city in the world? 3. Find the population of London for your next lesson. 4. What a large city London is ! 1. The chief purpose of the first sentence is to give information to the mind. 2. The chief purpose of the second sentence is to obtain information from the mind. 3. The chief purpose of the third sentence is to have the mind act, to cause it to do something. 4. The chief purpose of the fourth sentence is to awaken emotion. It awakens the emotion of surprise at the size of the city of London. This difference in the chief purpose of sen- tences gives us four classes on that basis. We call the first a Declarative sentence; the second, [26J ' Classes of Sentences 27 an Interrogative sentence; the third, an Impera- tive sentence; and the fourth, an Exclamatory sentence. 1 8. These Classes Defined. The four classes of sentences may be defined as follows : 1. A Declarative sentence is a sentence whose chief purpose is to give information; as, TJie first man zuas Adam. 2. An Interrogative * sentence is a sentence whose chief purpose is to obtain information; as, WJio zvas the first woman? 3. An Imperative sentence is a sentence whose chief purpose is to move the will ; as, Read the first stanza of the poem. 4. An Exclamatory sentence is a sentence whose chief purpose is to awaken emotion; as, Alas! That zve sJiould fail! Exercise 7 Classify flie following sentences on the basis of their chief purpose and give your reasons: 1. Constant dropping wears away stones. 2. Tom rowed with untired vigor, and with a different speed from poor Maggie's. — Eliot. 3. Mercy, sir, how the folks will talk of it ! 4. Men's evil manners live in brass, their virtues we write in water. 5. Come, Rollo, let us take a walk. 6. Why was the French Revolution so bloody and de- structive ? 28 An English Grammar 7. Be clean, for the strength of the hunter is known by the gloss of his hide. — Kipling. 8. Honey from out the quarreled hive I'll bring. 9. Lead us to some far-off sunny isle. 10. Where are you going, my pretty maid? 11. " The Dwarf asked, " Who is my master? " 12. Toussaint wrote to Napoleon, " Sire, I am a French citizen ; have I ever broken a law ? " 13. Tell me what you like and I will tell you what you are, — Ruskin. 14. " Think you, Abel," said Paul at last, " that the storm drove thither?" 15. The way was long, the wind was cold The minstrel was infirm and old. — Scott. Write five declarative sentences about facts in history. Write five interrogative sentences asking for information in geography. Write Hve impera- tive sentences zvhicJi may be used by the teacher. Write five exclamatory sentences which may be used in climbing mountains, at a circus, at a base ball game. Exercise 8 19. Arrangement of the Sentence. Point out the subject, predicate, and copula in each of the fol- lowing sentences: 1. I am a poor man. 2. Who will help me? 3. Every man's task is his life preserver. 4. The devil can catch a lazy man with a bare hook. 5. When did the leopard ever change his spots? 6. Can one stop the current of a river? Classes of Sentences 29 7. How beautiful is white-winged peace ! 8. How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth glad tidings ! 9. Great is Diana of the Ephesians. 10. Charity begins at home. 11. Am I required to go? 20. Arrangement Defined. In which kind of sentence in the preceding list does the subject usually come first, the copula next, and the predi- cate last? Is this always true? Notice sentence 9. In what kind of sentence does the copula sometimes come first? Notice sentence 11. Does the predi- cate of the sentence ever come first? Notice sen- tence 8. Sum up your observations on the sen- tences. The arrangement of the sentence is the order in which the parts occur in it; as. The Romans conquered the zvorld. Is the room zvarm? Whose hook have you? 21. Kinds of Arrangements. In the sen- tence, Poe ivas the father of the sJiort story, what is the order of the subject, predicate, and copula? We call this natural or regular arrangement. In what order are the subject, predicate, and copula when a sentence is in its natural order? In the sentence, Great was the fall of Rome, what is the order of the subject, predicate, and copula^ Does the copula ever come first in the sentence^ Illustrate. We call this arrangement of the sen- 30 An English Grammar tence inverted arrangement. In what order are the subject, predicate, and copula when a sentence is inverted arrangement? Natural or regular arrangement is that ar- rangement in which the subject comes first in the sentence, the copula next, and the predicate last; as, David was the clianipion of Israel. Inverted arrangement is any arrangement of the parts of a sentence other than the natural; as, Holy art thou, oh, Lord of Hosts! Arrange the sentences in the follozving extraet from "Evangeline" in their natitrol order: Fair was she to behold, that maiden of seventeen summers, Black were her eyes as the berry that grows on the thorn by the wayside, Black, yet how softly they gleamed beneath the brown shade of her tresses ! Sweet was her breath as the breath of kine that feed in the meadow, When in the harvest heat she bore to the reapers at noontide Flagons of home-brewed ale, ah ! fair in sooth was the maiden. Fairer was she when, on Sunday morn, while the bell from its turret Sprinkled with holy sounds the air, as the priest with his hyssop Sprinkles the congregation, and scatters blessings among them. But a celestial brightness, a more ethereal beauty, Shone on her face and encircled her form, when after confession. Classes of Sentences 31 Homeward serenely she walked with God's benediction upon her. When she had passed, it seemed like the ceasing of exquisite music. — Longfellozv. Exercise 9 Show what the arrangement of each of the fol- lozving sentences is, and notice the punctuation: 1. Thou shalt not steal. 2. Who killed Cock Robin? 3. Wait until you can see the whites of their eyes. 4. O what a rapturous cry ! 5. Alas ! that thou shouldst die ! 6. Oh, where shall rest be found ! 7. Whom were you seeking? 8. Is the world round? 9. In the city, Wilfred was discontented. 10. The Puritan prostrated himself in the dust before his Maker, but he set his foot on the neck of his king. — Macaulay. 22. Punctuation and Capitalization. By ex- amining the sentences in the preceding" lists, we may note the following": The first word of every sentence begins with a capital letter. The Declarative and Imperative sentences close with the period (.). The Interrogative sentence closes with the in- terrogation point (?). The Exclamatory sentence closes with the ex- clamation point ( !) . In the exclamatory sentence, ws often hr.ve a 32 An English Grammar &' word which expresses emotion. It is called an interjection. Point out the interjections in the preceding- list of sentences. Notice the punctuation marks after the interjections. 1. When the interjection and the remainder of the sentence unite closely to express the same emotion, no mark of punctuation follows the in- terjection ; as, Oh for a lodge in some vast wilder- ness! 2. When the interjection and the remainder of the sentence do not unite very closely to express the same emotion, the interjection is followed by the comma (,) ; as, Oh, how happy I am! 3. When the interjection expresses an emotion different from the thought expressed by the re- mainder of the sentence, the interjection should be followed by an exclamation point ( !) ; as, Alas! wJiat a terrible accident! Exercise 10 Punctuate and capitalise the follozving sen- tences, and give your reasons: 1. fie on him 2. the natives gathered around him 3. call the guard 4. oh that those lips had language 5. is the young man safe 6. oh for a kindly touch from that pure flame 7. oh what a fall was there my countrymen 8. the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak 9. alas what mortal terror we are in Classes of Sentences 33 lo. where was Columbus born If. and hark how clear bold Chanticleer warmed with the new wine of the year tells all in his lusty crowing — Lowell. 12, give me of your bark O Birch-tree Review and Work in Composition TO THE FRINGED GENTIAN Thou blossom bright with autumn dew, And colored with the heaven's own blue, That openest when the quiet light Succeeds the keen and frosty night. Thou comest not when violets lean O'er wandering brooks and springs unseen, Or columbines, in purple dressed, Nod o'er the ground-bird's hidden nest. Thou waitest late and com'st alone, When woods are bare and birds are flown. And frosts and shortening days portend The aged year is near his end. Then doth thy sweet and quiet eye Look through its fringes to the sky, Blue — blue — as if that sky let fall A flower from its cerulean wall. I would that thus, when I shall see The hour of death draw near to me, Hope blossoming within my heart, May look to heaven as I depart. — Bryant. Learn all you can about the fringed gentian from the poem. What color is it? JVhcn does it 34 An English Grammar bloom? Does it close at night and open in the morning? Note lines three and four of the first stanza. With zvhat other flozvers does the author contrast it? How? What is the ''ground-bird"? With what is the year compared? Explain the fourth stanza in your ozvn words. What is a "ceru- lean ivall"? What wish does the author express in the last stanza? Did you ever see a fringed gentian? Learn all you can about the flozver from sources other than the poem. Write one-page papers on one or tzvo of the fol- lozving topics: 1. Why is the fringed gentian so highly prized? 2. The Gentian and its Spring rivals ; a comparison. 3. Glimpses of Spring and Autumn. (Enlarge some of the scenes suggested by the poem.) 4. The (icntian and the Poet's wish. Chapter IV CLASSES OF SENTENCES 23. On the Basis of Number and Relation of the Thoughts Expressed, or the Form. Exam- ine the follozmng sentences carefully. Tell how many thoughts each expresses. Give the elements of each I Ji ought. Give the parts of each sentence or clause. IVhen the sentence 'expresses more than one tJi ought, try to state the relation between the thoughts. Is one thought a part of the otlier? Is it a part of the thought subject, or the thought predicate, or the thought relation of tJie other; or is neither thought a part of the other? 1. Washington, the father of his country, was our first president. 2. Washington, who was the father of liis country, was our first president. 3. Washington was the father of his country, and he was our first president. We notice that the first of these sentences ex- presses only a sinc^le thought subject, a single thought predicate, and a single thought relation Tn other words, it expresses only one thought. We call this kind of sentence a simple sentence. The second sentence expresses two thought [35] 36 An English Grammar &' subjects, two thought predicates, and two thought relations. In other words it expresses two thoughts. The first thought is expressed by the words, IVashington was our first president. Give the elements of this thought and then the parts of the clause. The second thought is expressed by the words. Who zvas tJie father of his country. Give the elements of this thought and then the parts of the clause. We notice, however, that the second thought is a part of the thought subject of the first thought. Sometimes the second thought is a part of the thought predicate or the thought relation of the first thought. When a thought is a part of one of the elements of another thought, we call it a subordinate thought, or we say that the thoughts expressed by such a sentence are of unequal rank. The first thought expressed by this second sentence we call a principal thought because it does not de- pend upon or is not a part of any other thought. We call this kind of a sentence a complex sen- tence. The third sentence in the list also expresses two thoughts. The first thought is expressed by the words, Washington was the father of his country. Give the elements of this thought and then the parts of the clause. The second thought is expressed by the words, lie zvas our first president. Give the elements of this thought and then the parts of the clause. In this particular it is like the second sentence and diflfers from the first sentence. It Classes of Sentences 37 differs from the second sentence, however, in that neither one of these thoughts is a part of the other. We say that they are independent thoughts or thoughts of equal rank because neither one is de- pendent upon or forms a part of the other. We call this kind of a sentence a compound sentence. 24. Simple, Complex and Compound Sen- tences Defined. From what we have said in the last section, we may form the following definitions: 1. A simple sentence is a sentence which ex- presses a single thought; as. Gold glitters. 2. A Complex sentence is a sentence which expresses one principal thought and one or more subordinate thoughts; as, Gold, which is valua- ble, glitters when held in the sunlight. 3. A Compound sentence is a sentence which expresses two or more independent thoughts of equal rank; as, Gold glitters in the sunlight and it is valuable. 25. The Clause Defined. We may also see from the last two Sections that a clause is very much like a sentence. It expresses a thought and like the sentence it has a subject, predicate and copula. But it is always a part of a sentence. A clause is a group of words, composed of a subject, predicate and copula, which is a part of a sentence; as, The Charter Oak, which zvas blown down in a storm, was an historic landmark. This sentence contains two clauses. The first clause 38 An Etiplish Gratnmar &' is the words, The Charter Oak zvas an historic land- mark. The second clause is the words, which was blozvn doivn in a storm. Exercise ii Take your dictionaries and find flic literal mean- ing of the zvords sXmplQ, complex and compound as indicated in Section r. D-o the literal meanings of these zvords help you to nnderst^and these kinds of sentences f Why? Analyze the follozving thonghts and sentences according to the follozving scheme: Classify the sentences on the two rases .which we HAVE so far discovered, THAT IS. ON THE BASIS OF CHIEF PURPOSE AND THE BASIS OF THE NUMBER AND RELATION OF THOUGHTS EXPRESSED, STATE THE BASIS IN EACH CASE AND GIVE THE REASONS FOR YOUR CLASSIFICATION. T. If TIIF SENTENCE IS A SIMPLE SENTENCE: (a) Give fhc elements of the tJionght expressed by it zmth reasons for each. (b) Give file parts of iJie sentence zmth reasons for eacJi. ir. If ttte sentence is complex: (a) Give tlie elements of the entire thought zvith reasons. (b) Give the parts of the entire sentence with reasons. (c) Give the zvords zvhich e.r press the principal thought. 1. Give the elements of the principal thought. 2. Give the parts of the principal clause. (d) Give the zvords zvhich express eacfi subordinate thought. 1. Give the elements of each subordinate thought. 2. Giz'c the parts of each subordinate clause. Classes of Sentences 39 TIT. Tf the sentence is compound: (a) Give the words zvkich express each independent thought. 1. Give the elements of each independent thought with reasons. 2. Give the parts of each independent clause with reasons. (b) Give the words zMch express each subordinate thought, if any. 1. Give the elements of each subordinate thought. 2. Give the parts of each subordinate clause. 1. Genius can breathe freely only in the atmosphere of freedom. 2. The pitch of the musical note depends upon the rapidity of vibration. 3. We can easily prove that the earth is a sphere. 4. They who are accompanied by noble thoughts are never alone. 5. Blessed is the man who has nothing to say and who ins-sts upon not saying it. 6. William Cullen Bryant was born at Cummington, Massachusetts, November 3, 1794. 7. The Embargo was published in Boston in 1809, and was written when Bryant was only thirteen years old. 8. The Catskill Mountains have always been a region full of fable. — Irving. 9. He was accustomed to tell his story to every stranger that arrived at Mr. Doolittle's hotel. — Irving. 10. Rip's story was soon told for the whole twenty years had been to him but as one night. — Irving. Ti. Many birds have different tones for various phases of their emotions. 12. Song sometimes seems to have in it the element of rejoicing in anticipation. 40 An English Grammar &' 13. There is a power whose care Teaches thy way along that pathless coast. — Bryant. 14. Vainly the fowler's eye Might mark thy distant flight to do thee wrong. — Bryant. 15. All that breathe will share thy destiny. — Bryant. 16. I have heard that nothing gives an author so great pleasure as to have his works respectfully quoted by other learned authors. — Franklin. 17. Silently, one by one, in the infinite meadows of heaven, blossomed the lovely stars. — Longfellow. 18. This pleasure I have seldom enjoyed. 19. Example appeals not to our understanding alone, but it awakens our passions likewise. 20. If thou didst ever thy dear father love, revenge his foul and most unnatural murder. — Shakespeare. 21. The strength he gains is from the embrace he gives. 22. If you blow your neighbor's fire, do not complain if the sparks fly in your face. 23. Do not measure other people in your half bushel. 24. There is no flock, however watched and tended, But one dead lamb is there ! There is no fireside, howsoe'er defended, But has one vacant chair ! — Longfellow. 25. Thou lingering star, with lessening ray. That lov'st to greet the early morn. Again thou usherest in the day My Mary from my soul was torn. — Burns. i6. Lightly and brightly breaks away The morning from her mantle gray. ^7. Softly sweet in Lydian measures, Soon he soothed his soul to pleasures ; War, he sung, is toil and trouble; Classes of Sentences 41 Honor but an empty bubble. — Dryden. 28. 'Tis an old maxim in the schools, That flattery's the food of fools ; Yet now and then your men of wit Will condescend to take a bit. — Swift. 29. 'Tis with our judgments as our watches ; none Are just alike, yet each believes his own. — Pope. 30. Love is the ladder on which we climb . To a likeness with God. — Pope. 31. Heaven from all creatures hides the book of fate, All but the page prescribed, their present state. —Pope. 32. Faith builds a bridge across the gulf of death. Exercise ii-B Notice the simple, complex and compound sen- tences in the extract from Hawthorne's "My Visit to Niagara ", on page 68. Hozv many do you find of each? How are they distributed through the paragraph? What is the advantage of this variety of sentences? Paragraph I. Simple Sentence. Rip entered the house. It was empty, forlorn and ap- parently abandoned. The desolation overcame all of hi> connubial fears. He called loudly for his wife and chil- dren. The lonely chambers rang for a moment with his voice. Then all again was silence. He hurried forth and hastened to his old resort, the village inn. It, too, was gone. —Irving. Paragraph II. Complex Sentence. As they descended. Rip every now and then heard long rolling peals like distant thunder, that seemed to issue from 42 An English Grmnmar &' a deep ravine, or rather cleft, between lofty rocks, toward which their rugged path conducted. Supposing it to be the muttering of one of those transient thunder-showers which often take place in mountain heights, he proceeded. — Irving. Paragraph III. Compound Sentence. They were dressed in quaint, outlandish fashion ; some wore short doublets; others jerkins with long knives in their belts; and most of them had enormous breeches of similar style with those of the guide. Their visages, too, were peculiar: one had a larg'e head, broad face, and small, piggish eyes; the face of another seemed to consist en- tirely of nose, and was surmounted by a white sugar-loaf hat, set off with a little red cock's tail. — Irving. Study the above paragraphs of simple, complex and compound sentences. What effect on the mind have the different forms of the sentence? Which is most dramatic? Which is clear, hut sometimes contains many thoughts? Which smooth and grace- fid, hut involved? Write a paragraph relating some experience of your own. Write it first using all simple sentences. Improve the smoothness hy changing some of the sentences to complex and some to compound sen- tences. See that all three kinds are represented. The Third Section Chapter V THOUGHT MATERIAL OR IDEAS 26. What We Have Learned. From the pre- ceding chapters we know the nature of a thought and the nature of a sentence. We know that the sentence expresses the thought and that the sentence takes different forms to make different impressions upon the mind or to express different thoughts. This gives us different kinds or classes of sentences. We know that each thought is made up of three elements and that each sentence con- tains three parts, subject, predicate, and copula, corresponding to or expressing the three elements of the thought. 27. The Use of Words. We now find, how- ever, that these organic parts of the sentence, the subject, predicate, and copula, are made up of smaller units which we call words. Subjects are not all alike; predicates are not all alike; nor are copulas all alike. We cannot understand words, however, until we understand that which the word expresses, the idea, just as we saw that in order to understand the sentence, we must understand the thought which it expresses. The word is an instrument for expressing the idea just as the [43J 44 An EniiUsh Grammar t>' sentence is the instrument for expressing the thought. Examine the ideas expressed by the words in the following sentence to see if they are all alike. How do they differ? Notice how the mind uses the ideas in constructing thoughts: Jefferson, the author of the Constitution, was a great statesman. In studying the ideas expressed by the words in this sentence, you will notice that the mind can- not use all of them in the same way in constructing a thought. Take, for example, the idea expressed by the word, Jefferson. You will notice that it is an idea which may be made the subject of a thought. We may think or affirm or assert another idea of it. We may think, Jefferson is dead, or Jefferson zvas independent in his thought. We call such an idea an object of thought. The ideas, author, Constitution and statesman are also objects of thought because the mind may as- sert other ideas of these. There are no other ideas expressed in the sen- tence about which the mind can assert another idea. The mind cannot assert another idea about the ideas the, of, zvas, a, and great. These are not ideas which can be made subjects of thoughts. Now if we think carefully about the idea expressed by the word, great, we see that it is an idea which always belongs to another idea. We cannot find a great by itself. In this case, the idea, great, belongs to the idea statesman. Thought Material or Ideas 4-5 The ideas, the and a, are like the idea, great. These are ideas by means of which the mind distinguishes one idea from another. We call such ideas at- tributes. How do you distinguish a chair from a table, a knife from a pen? If we take the idea expressed by the word, is, we can easily see that it is not an object of thought, because the mind cannot assert another idea of it; nor is it an attribute because it does not belong to any other idea. We cannot have an is pen or an is knife. The idea, is, is merely the connection which the mind sees to exist between the thought subject, Jefferson, the author of the Constitution, and the thought predicate, a great statesman. The idea, of, is also an idea of relation. It is merely the connection which the mind sees to exist between the idea, author, and the idea, Constitution. If I hold a book just above the table, the idea, above, is the connection which my mind sees to exist between the book and the table. If I hold it under the table, the idea, under, is the idea of connection which my mind sees to exist between the two. If I place it upon the table the idea, upon, is the connection, and so on. We call these ideas ideas of relation. Find ten ideas of relation expressed in the sentences in Exercise lo. 28. Ideas Defined. An idea is any mental activity simpler than a thought. An idea is any component element of a thought; as, The sun is 46 An Enplish Grammar i>' ninety-tzvo million miles distant. Every word in this sentence expresses an idea. Sometimes two or more words express an idea, though in this case, the idea is complex, composed of one principal idea and other subordinate ideas belonging to it. The words, The sun, in this sentence express such a complex idea ; so do the words,^ ninety-tzvo million miles distant.' An object of thought is an idea about which the mind can assert another idea; as. Snow is composed of little crystals. The objects of thought are the ideas, Snozv and crystals. An attribute is an idea by which the mind dis- tinguishes other ideas; as, The Mississippi, the largest riz'er in the United States, flozvs into the Gidf of Mexico. The attributes are the ideas, The. largest, and Hozvs. An idea of relation is the connection which the mind sees to exist between other ideas; as, The scenery of the Rocky Mountains is unsur- passed. The ideas of relation are the ideas, of and is. These are all the kinds of ideas which the mind uses in constructing thoughts. Exercise 12 Classify the ideas expressed by the zvords in the follozving sentences, giving reasons: Model: Elephants are poiverfnl animals. The idea Elephants is an object of thought because it is an idea about Thought Material or Ideas 47 which the mind can assert another idea. The idea are is an idea of relation, because it is the connection which the mind sees to exist between other ideas. The idea powerful is an attribute because it is an idea by which the mind distin- guishes another idea. I. Find all fJie objects of thought expressed in the following sentences, and give reasons: 1. This plant came from Palestine. 2. The people watched them in silence. 3. He of the rueful countenance answered without delay. 4. Like the leaves of the forest when summer is green, That host with their banners at sunset were seen ; Like the leaves of the forest when autumn hath blown. That host on the morrow lay withered and strown. — Byron. II. Find all the attributes expressed in the fol- loiving sentences, and tell zvhy they are attributes: 1. Truth crushed to earth will rise again. 2. The smooth glass is transparent. 3. The running stream murmurs sweetly. 4. The morns are m.eeker than they were, The nuts are getting brown ; The berry's cheek is plumper, The rose is out of town. 5. The maple wears a gayer scarf, The field a gayer gown. Lest I should be old-fashioned, I'll put a trinket on. — Dickinson. III. Find all the ideas of relation expressed in the fnlloiving sentences, and tell why they are ideas of relation: ^8 An English Grammar 1. The red sky is beautiful. 2. The rushing storm is frightful. 3. The sun is set ; the swallows are asleep ; The bats are flitting past in the gray air; The slow, soft toads out of damp corners creep, And evening's breath, wandering here and there Over the quivering surface of the stream. Wakes not one ripple from its. silent dream. — Shelley. IV. Classify iJie ideas expressed by the words in the following sentences, and give reasons: I. By fairy hands their knell is rung; By forms unseen their dirge is sung; There Honour comes, a pilgrim gray. To bless the turf that wraps their clay; And Freedom shall awhile repair To dwell a weeping hermit there. 2. The Night is mother of the Day, The Winter of the Spring, And ever upon old Decay The greenest mosses cling. Behind the cloud the starlight lurks. Through showers the sunbeams fall; For God, who loveth all His works. Hath left His Hope with all ! — Collins. -Whittier. Review and Work in Composition Song of the Chattahoochee. Out of the hills of Habersham, Down the valleys of Hall, I hurry amain to reach the plain. Thought Material or Ideas 49 Run the rapid and leap the fall, Split at the rock and together again, Accept my bed, or narrow or wide, And flee from folly on every side With a lover's pain to attain the plain Far from the hills of Habersham, Far from the valleys of Hall. All down the hills of Habersham, All through the valleys of Hall, The rushes cried, Abide, abide, The wilful waterweeds held me thrall. The laving laurel turned my tide. The ferns and the fondling grass said Stay, The dewberry dipped for to work delay, And the little reeds sighed. Abide, abide. Here in the hills of Habersham, Here in the valleys of Hall. High o'er the hills of Habersham, Veiling the valleys of Hall, The hickory told me manifold Fair tales of shade, the poplars tall Wrought me her shadowy self to hold. The chestnuts, the oak, the walnut, the pine, Overleaning with flickering meaning and sign, Said, Pass not, so cold, these manifold Deep shades of the hills of Habersham, These glades in the valleys of Hall. And oft in the hills of Habcrsharri, And oft in the valleys of Hall, The white quartz shone, and the smooth brook-stone Did bar me of passage with friendly brawl, And many a luminous jewel lone 50 An English Grammar ^' — Crystals clear or a-cloud with mist, Ruby, garnet and amethyst — Made lures with the lights of streaming stone In the clefts of the hills of Habersham, In the beds of the valleys of Hall. But oh, not the hills of Habersham, And oh, not the valleys of Hall Avail : I am fain for to, water the plain. Downward the voices of Duty call — Downward, to toil and be mixed with the main, The dry fields burn and the mills are to turn. And a myriad flowers mortally yearn. And the lordly main from beyond the plain, Calls o'er the hills of Habersham, Calls through the valleys of Hall. — Lanier. Do yoit like the poem? Why? Explain the thougJit of it in your ozvn zvords. With zvhat dif- ficulties does tlie stream meet in reaching ''the main"? What human qualities does the stream exhibit? What is the work of the stream as ex- pressed in the last stanza? Does this poem contain a lesson for people? Write one-page papers in answer to tzvo or three of the aboz'e questions. Chapter VI WORDS 29. The Word Defined. We have seen in the preceding- chapter that a word is the expression of an idea. This is not an accurate definition, how- ever, for sometimes a group of words expresses an idea; as, Our friends started in the morning. The expression, in the morning, expresses an idea of time. Sometimes, too, a word expresses more than one idea; as. The sun shines. The word, shines, expresses the thought relation and the thought predicate. \\'e can see that it expresses two ideas, because it is equivalent to the ex- pression, is shining. Here the word, is, expresses one idea, and the word, shining, expresses another. There are some words also which do not express ideas, as we shall see" later on ; but for all practical purposes we may say : A word is a symbol which expresses an idea. This is its usual function. 30. Classes of Words. We have seen in the preceding- chapter that there are three great classes of ideas: objects of thought, attributes, and ideas of relation. Since words arc the instru- ments to express ideas, just as sentences are the instruments to express thoughts, we must have [51] ^2 An English Grammar three great classes of words; one to express ob- jects of thought, one to express attributes, and one to express ideas of relation. In this sentence, The stars are beautiful, the word, stars, expresses an object of thought. In the sentence. He is my friend, the words, he, my, and friend, express objects of thought. We call such a word a substantive word. A substantive word is a word which expresses an object of thought; as, Franklin ivrote good English. In the sentence, The tall iiian ivalked rapidly home, the words, the, tall, i^mlked, and rapidly, ex- press attributes. We call such words attributive words. An attributive word is a word which expresses an attribute; as. The white roses are fragrant. In the sentence. The zvater flows through the mill by the river, and it is turning the maehinery, the words, through, by, and, and is, express ideas of relation. We call such words relational words. A relational word is a word which expresses an idea of relation; as. The mill zvill never grind with the water which is past. Exercise 13 In the follozving sentences, point out the sub- stantive, attributive, and relational zvords, giving reasons for each: I. The inventions of paper and the press have put an Words oS end to all these restraints ; they have made everyone a writer, and enabled every mind to pour itself into print, and diffuse itself over the whole intellectual world. The consequences are alarming. The stream of literature has swollen into torrent, augmented into a river, expanded into a sea. — having. 2. He may live without books, — what is knowledge but grieving? He may live without hope, — what is hope but deceiv- ing? He may live without love, — what is passion but pin- ing? But where is the man who can live without dinins;? — Owen M credit J I. 31. Substantive Words: Nouns and Pro- nouns. Examine the italicized substantive zvords in the follozving sentences: 1. The knife is on the table. 2. The hook is on the table. 3. The pen is on the table. 4. It is on the table. When we use the substantive words, knife, book, or pen, we know just what object is on the table be- cause these words name the objects of thought which they express. When we use the substantive word, it, we are not sure just what object is on the table. We know that some object is on the table, for the word, it, expresses an object of thought, but it might be the pen, the book, or the knife, or any other object of thought, because the word, it, does not name the object of thought which it expresses. 5-i An English Grauunar This diiference in the way in which substantive words express objects of thought gives us two classes of them, namel}^, nouns and pronouns. A noun is a substantive w^ord which expresses an object of thought by naming it; as, Senators are elected by the legislature. A pronoun is a substantive word which ex- presses an object of thought without naming it ; as, They are elected for two years. Exercise 14 Point out the nouns and pronouns in the follozv- ing sentences. Give your reasons in each case: 1. Life, we've been long together; Through pleasant and through cloudy weather. 2. Tis hard to part when friends are dear ; Perhaps 'twill cost a sigh, a tear ; Then steal away, give little warning ; Choose thine own time; Say not " goodnight," But in some brighter clime Bid me " good-morning ! " — Mrs. Barbauld. 3. You should never despair of truth. 4. They, themselves, welcomed us gladly. 5. I talk half the time to find out my own thoughts, as a schoolboy turns his pockets inside out to see what is in them. — Holmes. 32. Attribute Words : Adjectives, Attributive Verbs, and Adverbs. In the sentence, The schol- arly man is in demand to-day, the word, scholarly, is an attributive w^ord because it expresses an JVords 55 attribute. The attribute expressed by it belongs to the object of thought expressed by the word, man, hence the word, scholarly, expresses an attri- bute of an object of thought. In the sentence, Truth triumphs in the end, the word, triumphs, is an attributive word because it expresses an attribute. The attribute expressed by it belongs to the object of thought expressed by the word, truth, hence the word, triumphs, ex- presses an attribute of an object of thought. We see, then, that in this particular, the word, scholarly, and the word, triumphs, are just alike. Each expresses an attribute of an object of thought. But they differ in one feature also. The word, triumphs, expresses a thought relation, that is, the relation between thought subject and thought predicate ; while the word, scholarly, does not. This is the distinction between the two. We call such words as the word, scholarly, adjectives. We call such words as the word, tri- umphs, attributive verbs. An adjective is an attributive word which ex- presses merely an attribute of an object of thought; as. Grateful persons resemble fertile fields. An attributive verb is an attributive word which expresses an attribute of an object of thought and also a thought relation; as. He car- ried the palm. Tn the sentence. The clouds of adversity soon Ob An hnglisn urammar vanislij the word, soon, is an attributive word be- cause it expresses an attribute. The attribute ex- pressed by it does not 1)elong to an object of thought, so it cannot be an adjective or an attrib- utive verb. The attribute expressed by the word, soon, belongs to the attribute, expressed by the word, vanishes, hence the w^ord, soon, expresses an attribute of an attribute. In the sentence, Avarice is not a jezvel, the word, not, is an attributive word because it ex- presses an attribute. It does not express an at- tribute of an object of thought, nor does it ex- press an attribute of an attribute hke the word, soon. The word, not, expresses an attribute which belongs to the idea of relation expressed by the word, is, hence the word, not, expresses an attri- bute of an idea of relation. If a word expresses an attribute of an attribute, like the word, soon, or an attribute of an idea of re- lation like the word, not, we call it an adverb. An adverb is an attributive word which ex- presses an attribute of an attribute, or an attri- bute of an idea of relation; as, Trade, like a rest- ive horse, is not easily managed. The pen is per- haps mightier tlian the szvord. Exercise 15 Point out tlie adjectives, attributive verbs, and adverbs in tJie follovuing sentences. Give your rea- sons in each case: Words 57 1. Presence of mind is greatly promoted by absence of body. 2. A great many children get on the wrong track because the switch is misplaced. 3. Blue were her eyes as the fairy flax. 4. And thrice the Saxon blade drank blood. 5. Ere long he reached the magnificent glacier of the Rhone, a frozen cataract more than two thousand feet in height, and many miles broad at its base. It fills the whole valley between two mountains, running back to their sum- mits. At the base it is arched, like a dome, and above jagged and rough, and resembles a mass of crystals of a pale emerald tint, mingled with white. — Longfelloi^'. 6. Highways and cross paths are soon traversed ; and, clambering down a crag, I find myself at the extremity of a long beach. — Hawthorne. Find the attributive verbs in this verse: Three wives sat up in the lighthouse tower, And trimmed the lamps as the sun went down ; And they looked at the squall, and they looked at the shower, And the rack it came rolling up, ragged and brown ; But men must work, and women must weep, Though storms be sudden, and waters deep, -^ And the harbor bar be moaning. — Kiiigsley. Find the adjectives in the same verse. 33. Relational Words. Pure Verbs, Preposi- tions, and Conjunctions: In the sentence, Ghiss is transparent, the word, is, is a relational word, because it expresses an idea of relation. It expresses the idea of relation between the thought subject. 58 Ail English Grammar Glass, and the thought predicate, transparent, and it expresses nothing else. The attributive verb al- ways expresses a thought relation too, but it always expresses an attribute also. This word, is, and other words like it, never express anything but the thought relation. We call such words pure verbs. A pure verb is a relational word which ex- presses only a thought relation; as, Virtue is a jczvcl. (Reread section i6 on page 20 carefully.) Point out the pure verbs in the second para- graph of JVhitc's " The 'Lunge" on page jji". In the sentence, Choate zvas one of the greatest men of the age, the word, of, in each case is a relational word because it expresses an idea of relation. The first word, of, expresses an idea of relation between the ideas, one and men; the sec- ond word, of, expresses the relation between the ideas, men and age. These are ideas of unequal rank, that is, the one idea belongs to the other, or is subordinate to the other. They are not of equal importance in the thought. The idea, men, is sub- ordinate to the idea, one; and the idea, age, is sub- ordinate to the idea, men. We call a word that expresses this subordinate relation between ideas a preposition. A preposition is a relational word which ex- presses a relation between ideas of unequal rank ; as, The country was wasted by the sword. Words 59 Find five prepositions in the first paragrapJi of " The 'Lunge" on page S3^- There is one other kind of relational word. In the sentence, Bread and milk is a good food, the word, and, is a relational word because it ex- presses an idea of relation. It expresses the re- lation between the ideas, bread and milk. These ideas are of equal rank; that is, they are of equal importance in the structure of the thought. This is just the opposite of the kind of relation expressed by the preposition. In one way it is like the relation expressed by the pure verb, for the thought relation which the pure verb expresses is a relation between ideas of equal rank. The thought subject and the thought predicate are always ideas of equal rank as they are both principal elements of the thought. But the relation expressed by the pure verb, the thought relation, is always an asserted relation; while the relation expressed by the word, and, and other words like it, is always an unasserted relation. The mind does not assert the relation between the ideas, bread and milk; but it always asserts the thought relation or the relation between the thought subject and the thought predicate. This unasserted relation may exist between thoughts as well as between ideas; as, TJie hedges are white zvith May, but the wind carries traces of March. Here the word, but, is the relational word 6o An English Grammar is' and it expresses an unasserted relation between two thoughts of equal rank. Sometimes this kind of word also expresses an 'masserted relation between thoughts of unequal rank; as. Let my right hand forget her cunning if / forget thee. Here the word, if, expresses an unasserted relation between the^ thought, Let my right hand fwget her cunning and the thought, / forget' tliee. We notice now that this kind of word ex- presses merely or only an unasserted relation be- tween ideas or thoughts of equal rank, or between thoughts of unequal rank. It does not express this relation and in addition to it an object of thought, as does the relative pronoun; nor does it express this idea of relation and in addition to it an attri- bute, as does the conjunctive adverb, as we shall see later on. These w^ords have simply this relational use and we call tliem conjunctions. A conjunction is a relational word which ex- presses only an unasserted relation between ideas or thoughts of equal rank, or between thoughts of unequal rank; as, TJie tlag is red, zvhite, and blue. Truth is often crushed to earth or falsehood coidd not succeed as she does. We waited until the train arrived. Find examples of these conjunctions in "Robin Hood and AUiu a fhdc", on page lOj. I. Fill tJie following blanks zvitli relational Words 61 words which express asserted relation betzveen ideas of equal rank, using a different word in each case: 1. The lion the king- of beasts. 2. The soldier- -an officer. 3. The bells clear. 4. The doctor here. 5. Our teachers surprised. ^ II. Fill the follozving blanks with words which express only unasserted relation between ideas of equal rank: 1. Ten two are twelve. 2. The hardships of the voyage landing were num- erous. 3. ]\Tr. Hornung sells boots shoes. 4. The badge was yellow blue. 5. His sister is a gracious talented woman. III. Fill the following blanks zvith words which express only unasserted relation between thoughts of equal rank: 1. Then the rains descended the floods came. 2. Such a law i-s needed, this one is faulty. 3. You may sun' yourself on the deck read in the cabin. 4. Improvement comes only with effort —we must all work. 5. The horse is beautiful he is unreliable. I\^ Fill the follozving blanks with zvords which express only unasserted relation between thoughts 'of unequal rank: 62 An English Grammar 1. We shall wait the train arrives. 2. James cannot go the sun rises. 3. You will be successful- you persist. 4. You must rise early you will be ready. 5. Samuel will not come you invite him. V. Fill the follozving blanks with words which express relation betzveen ideas of unequal rank: 1. The snow^ the mountains is beautiful. 2. The eagle's nest is built the crag. 3. The castle Blenheim stands the river's brink. 4. The flag the battleship was destroyed. Tell zvhat kind of relational zvord you have in- serted in each group and zuJiy. Exercise 16 Classify the relational zvords in the follozving sentences, giving reasons: 1. The legs of the table and of the chair were made of walnut. 2. He spoke and they listened. 3. They listened but they could not hear. 4. They went because they could not help it. 5. If any one attempts to haul down the American flag, shoot him on the spot. 6. They only knew that the earth was bright and the sky was blue. 7. He will come before you have waited long. 8. You may have the book or the knife. 9. Grace and beauty is a desirable combination. 10. He was angry, otherwise he would have stayed. 11. He is very ill, yet he may live a week. Words 63 12. He had left before I arrived. 13. We heard the poet and artist. 14. Man may err, but no one but a fool will persist in error. 15. The wind grumbled and made itself miserable all last night, and this morning it is still howling as ill-naturedly as ever, and roaring and rumbling in the chimneys. — Hazvthorne. 16. " The rose is fairest when 'tis budding new, And hope is brightest when it dawns from fears, The rose is sweetest washed with morning dew, And love is loveliest when embalmed in tears. O wilding rose, whom fancy thus endears, I bid your blossoms in my bonnet wave, Emblem of love and hope through future years ! " Thus spoke young Norman, heir of Armadave, What time the sun arose on Vennachar's broad wave. — Scott. *34. Form Words: Interjections and Ex- pletives. We have nozv discovered all the kinds of zvords zvhich are absolutely essential in expressing our thoughts. If we examine the italicised words in tJie follozving sentences, hozvever, zve shall see that they cannot he classified as substantive, attri- butive, or relational words: 1. Alas', that thou shouldst die! 2. Pshaw! I do not care a fig! 3. There is sunshine in my soul. 4. There are four boys in the class. The italicized words do not express objects of Note: Pupils should not spend much time on form words. 64 An Erwlish Grammar i>' thought, attributes, nor ideas of relation. The same thoughts or essentially the same thoughts may be expressed by the sentences, if these italicized words be omitted from them, thus: 1. That thou shouldst die! 2. I do not care a fig ! 3. Sunshine is in my soul. 4. Four boys are in the class. The words, alas and pshaw, seem to express some vague kind of idea, which we call emotion or feeling. The word, there, in both the sen- tences, expresses no idea at all. The thought ex- pressed by the sentence is just as complete without it as it is with it. These words we call form words. A form word is a word which is not essential to the expression of the thought; as, Oh, that I had the wings of a dove! Well, what did he say? We do not mean to say, however, that form words are of no use in the sentence. They are not essential in the expression of the thought, but they do in some way improve the form of the sentence or help to make the thought clearer or more ^^mphatic. The form words like oh, alas, pshazv, in the sentences already given, express emotion or feel- ing, and we call them interjections. An Interjection is a form word which ex- Words 65 presses emotion or feeling; as, Oh, that I could find him! Other form words do not express emotion or feeHng. Some of them simply introduce the sen- tence or make it less abrupt ; as, Well, did you vote? Others change the arrangement of the sentence, making it smoother; as, There ivcre giants in those days. If we omit the form word we must change the arrangement of the sentence, thus: Giants zuere in those days. This is not so smooth a sentence as the other. It sounds awkward. This kind of form words we call expletives. An expletive is a form word which changes the arrangement of the sentence, makes it less abrupt or in some way improves its form; as, 1. N'ow, I do not believe a word of it. 2. There were five people present. 3. There is a pleasure in the pathless woods. We can easily see, however, that these are not important words. Notice the use of form words in "A Selection from Saul", on page 103. 35. Infinitives and Participles. We need to notice here two other kinds of words. They are not different in their uses, however, from nouns, adject- ives, adverbs, and relational words. They are only forms of the verb which have lost the asserting power or the power of expressing a thought rela- 66 An English Grammar tion and are used in the sentence with the force of some other word; as, 1. The sun, shining in at the window, warmed the room. 2. We beHeve in the life to come. 3. They came to assist us. 4. To zvander in the woods was his deUght. The word, shining, and the expressions, to come, to assist, and to zvander, are forms of the verbs, shine, come, assist, and wander, but they do not ex- press thought relations in these forms. The word, shining, and the expression, to come, are used as adjectives; the expression, to assist, \svistdi2.s> din adverb; and the expression, to zvander, is used as a substantive word, and is the principal part of the subject of the sentence. These \vords and expressions are called infini- tives and participles, but for the present, as we are now dealing only with the uses of words, we may simply call them nouns, adjectives, or ad- verbs, according to their use. Later on we shall take up these w^ords and study them in detail. We may here, however, easily formulate the fol- lowing definitions: An infinitive is the root form of the verb which does not express a thought relation; as, To walk rapidly is tiresome. The to here is a form word, not a preposition, as it usually is. It is a part of the infinitive. We say the infinitive is the expression, to walk. The to is called the sign of the infinitive. Words 67 A participle is the derived form of the verb which does not express a thought relation; as, The man, wretched in his grief, could not he com- forted. The Hood of time is rolling on. Exercise 17 Classify the words in the following sentences into their smallest known classes. Give your rea- son in each case: r. Hiawatha thought that there was an old woman m the moon. 2. The little boy asked many questions. 3. Nokomis answered his questions. 4. RippHng waters sang to him. 5. What is the water singing, Nokomis? 6. In the frosty winter nights, Hiawatha lay on his bed of moss. 7. *' The broad road of stars is the pathway of the Indian shadows." said Nokomis. 8. These sounds lulled Hiawatha to sleep. 9. " I will sing you a cradle song," said Nokomis. ro. In the wigwam it was dark. ri. Now, Barabbas was a robber. 12. Well, what are you going to do about it? 13. Our business is to grow. 14- In the shipwreck of the state, trifles float and are preserved: while everything valuable sinks to the bottom, and is lost forever. 15. In peace, children bury tiieir parents ; in war, parents bury their children. r6. If you wish to enrich a person, study not to increase his stores but to diminish his desires. 17. Words are the counters of wise men, and the money of fools. 68 An English Grammar ^' 18. A juggler is a wit in things, and a wit, a juggler in words. 19. Charity creates much of the misery it relieves, but does not relieve all the misery it creates. 20. Worth makes the man, the want of it the fellow. 21. And, balancing on a blackberry-briar, The Cardinal sang with his heart on fire. 22. The poor and the rich, the weak and the strong, the young and the old have one common ^Father. 23. Man, like the child, accepts the profifered boon. And clasps the bauble, where he asked the moon. — Pope. 24. Know then this truth, enough for man to know, Virtue alone is happiness below. — Pope. 25. O summer day beside the joyous sea ! O summer day so wonderful and white. So full of gladness and so full of pain ! Forever and forever shalt thou be To some the gravestone of a dead delight, To some the landmark of a new domain. — Longfellozv. 26. Above and below me were the rapids, a river of im- petuous snow, with here and there a dark rock amid its whiteness, resisting all the physical fury, as any cold spirit did the moral influences of the scene. On reaching Goat Island, which separates the two great segments of the falls, I chose the right-hand path, and followed it to the edge of the American cascade. There, while the falling sheet was yet invisible, I saw the vapor that never vanishes, and the Eternal Rainbow of Niagara. — From Hawthorne's " My Visit to Niagara." Chapter VII *THE PHRASE 36. The Phrase Defined. W'c have now dis- covered all the kinds of words which we use in expressing our ideas. We are now to see that sometimes a number of words unite to express a single idea, or the group of words may have the use of a single word in the sentence; as, TJic speaker stood on the platform. In this sentence the group of words, 011 the platform, expresses the idea of place. My brother arrived in flic evening. Tn this sentence, the group of words,\ in the evening, expresses the idea of time. These, groups of words are used in the sentence with the) value of an adverB. A man of ivealth may do miiclv good. The group of words, of wealth, expresses one idea and the expression is used in the sen- tence with the value of an adjective. We call such a group of words a phrase. A phrase is a group of words, not having a subject, predicate, or copula, which is used in the sentence with the value of a single word; as, To succeed in life is his desire. * Note : Pupils need not dwell long upon classes of phrases on the basis of the characteristic word. [69 1 70 All English Grammar 37. Classes of Phrases. In the sentence, He came into the room. The group of words, into the room, is a phrase. The characteristic word of the phrase or the word that gives character or name to the phrase is the preposition, into; hence we call this kind of phrase a prepositional phrase. In the sentence, William likes to visit his friends frequently, the expression, to visit his friends fre- quently, is a phrase. The characteristic word of this phrase is the infinitive, to visit; hence we call this kind of phrase an infinitive phrase. In the sentence, The girl reading the hook is my sister, the expression, reading the hook, is a phrase. The characteristic word of this phrase is the parti- ciple, reading; hence we call this kind of phrase a participial phrase. In the sentence. The hoy should have hurried, the expression, should have hurried, is a phrase. The characteristic word of this phrase is the verb ; hence we call this kind of phrase a verbal phrase. 38. Phrases on the Basis of the Characteris- tic Word Defined. We have seen now that we have four kinds of phrases on basis of the char- acteristic word, as follows: 1. A prepositional phrase is a phrase whose characteristic word is a preposition;. is, The pris- oner stood before the judge. 2. An infinitive phrase is a phrase whose char- acteristic word is an infinitive; as, To read Emer- son requires concentration. The Phrase 71 3. A participial phrase is a phrase whose char- acteristic word is a participle; as, Reading Haw- thorne is a delightful pastime. 4. A verbal phrase is a phrase whose charac- teristic word is a verb; as, He had watched, with a heating heart, the departure of^he troops under Dunwoodie. Harvey had been honest with his captors. In the paragraph from Lord Macaulay, on page TOi, point out the phrases on the basis of the char- acteristic ivord. 39. Classes of Phrases on the Basis of Their Use in the Sentence, i . In the sentence, Throwing the ham mer is good exercise, the expression, throwing the hammer, is a participial phrase, on the basis of the characteristic word. It is used as the subject of the sentence, that is, with the value of a substantive word; hence we call this kind of phrase a substantive phrase. 2. In the sentence. He believed himself to be the messenger of the Deity to the people of Athens, the expression, of the Deity, is a prepositional phrase, on the basis of the characteristic word. It is used in the sentence as an adjective, that is, with the value of an attributive word ; hence we call this kind of phrase an attributive phrase. 3. In the sentence, Cromzvell might have been King, the expression, might have been, is a verbal 72 An English Grammar phrase, on the basis of the characteristic word. It is used as the co]nila of the sentence, that is, with the value of a relational word; hence we call this kind of a phrase a relational phrase. 40. Phrases on the Basis of Their Use De- fined. These may be defined as follows: 1. A substantive phrase is a phrase which is used in the sentence with the value of a substan- tive word; as. The Greeks sought to produce per- fect form. 2. An attributive phrase is a phrase v/hich is used in the sentence with the value of an attribu- tive word; b.s, Suddenly a man wading breast-high through the water appeared. 3. A relational phrase is a phrase which is used in the sentence with the value of a relational .word; as. The Spaniards had been outwitted. 41. Classes of Attributive Phrases, i. If we examine the phrases in the sentence, So confident zvas he in the conelusion of the Council that he had volunteered in the morning to go thither alone, we can see that attributive phrases are not all alike. The expression, of the eouncil, on the basis of the characteristic word, is a prepositional phrase; and on the basis of use, it is an attributive phrase. It is used, however, with the value of an adjective; hence, on the basis of use, we can put it into a smaller class than attributive. We call such an attributive phrase an adjective phrase. The Phrase 73 2. The expression, in the morning, is also a prepositional phrase, on the basis of the character- istic word; and on the basis of use, it is an attrib- utive phrase. But it is used in the sentence with the value of an adverb; hence we call this kind of attributive phrase an adverbial phrase. 3. Ag-ain, if we notice the phrase, had volun- teered, we can see that on the basis of the char- acteristic word, it is a verbal phrase; and on the basis of use, it is an attributive phrase. But it is used in the sentence with the value of an attributive \&vh. We call this kind of attributive phrase an attributive verb-phrase. On the same basis of use in the sentence, then, we have the attributive phrase divided into the adjective phrase, the adverbial phrase, and the attributive verb-phrase. 42. Classes of Attributive Phrases Defined, These may be defined as follows: 1. An adjective phrase is an attributive phrase which is used in the sentence with the value of an adjective; as, He took a house in the neighborhood of his native town. 2. An adverbial phrase is an attributive phrase which is used in the sentence with the value of an adverb; as, Atliene went to the land of the Phoenicians. 3. An attributive verb-phrase is an attribu- tive phrase which is used in the sentence with the 74 An English Grammar value of an attributive verb; as, The old bell had rung out joyfully on many occasions. Exercise i8 Study the following sentences: 1 . Read each phrase and tell why it is a phrase. 2. Classify it on the basis of its characteristic word and give a reason. 3. Classify it, on the basis of use in the sentence, into its smallest known class, and give a reason: 1. The State University of Minnesota is located in the city of MinneapoHs. 2. He has learned to love and obey his teacher. 3. The boy to be chosen must be intelligent to be useful. 4. He lives to assist his friends. 5. To lie willingly is base. 6. Walking the race was tiresome to the man wearing the blue coat. 7. We could not cross, being unable to ford the river. 8. Being a member of the regiment, he passed unchal- lenged. 9. The city of large dimensions sends the most goods to foreign countries. 10. Caesar might have been King. 11. The traveler had walked many miles. 12. The child sat in the window. 13. The temperature of California is mild. 14. Like a spear of flame the cardinal flower Burned out along the meadow. — Eddy. 15. Time is the warp of life. Oh, tell the young, the gay, the fair, To weave it well ! — Marsden. The Phrase 76 i6. How sweet it was to draw near my own home after living homeless in the world so long ! — Haivthorne. 17. Sweet are the uses of adversity, Which like the toad, ugly and venomous, Wears yet a precious jewel in his head. — Shakespeare. 18. The sufficiency of my merit is to know that my merit is not sufficient. — St. Augustine. 19. There were tones in the voice that whispered then you may hear to-day in a hundred men. — Holmes. 20. This then my creed, to do the best I can And grant the same to every other man ; So live that my attendant angel be Not less the angel for his walk with me. Review /// the extract from HazvtJiorne's "My Visit to Niagara", on page 68, find tJiree phrases of each kind on each basis. Chapter VIII MODIFIERS. 43. The Modifier Defined. Now that we set clearly all the different kinds of words, we are able to see how these words may be united in forming subjects, predicates, and copulas. Notice first that each italicized expression in the following sentences is a word or group of words : 1. Milton, the poet, was blind. 2. Mary's book is soiled. 3. The ivhitc snow hurts my eyes. 4. The minister had lately come from the East. The first italicized expression is a group of words; the second, a word; the third, fourth, and fifth are words; the sixth and last are groups of words; and the seventh is a word. Notice next that each italicized expression changes the meaning of some other part of the sentence. The first changes the meaning, or em- phasizes the meaning of the word, Milton; the sec- ond changes the meaning of the same word, Milton ; the third changes the meaning of the word, book, so does the fourth; the fifth changes the meaning of the word, snow; the sixth changes the meaning of the Avord, kiirf.<:, the seventh and eighth change rjir meanmg of the expression, liad come^ f76] THE DAY'S WORK DONE (See page 187) Modifiers . 77 So far the italicized expressions are all alike. Now notice one fundamental difference. The itali- cized expressions, blind and soiled, express asserted ideas. They are the predicates of the two sentences in which they occur. All the other italicized ex- pressions express unasserted ideas. This is the distinguishing mark of a modifier. The predicate is a principal part of the sentence, hence it can never be a modiHer or a subordinate part of the sentence any more than the copula or subject can. A modifier is a word or group of words which changes the meaning of some other part of the sentence, by expressing an unasserted idea; as, It is a long lane that has no turning. 44. Kinds of Modifiers. Tf you will notice the modifiers in the sentences under Section 43, you will see that they do not all express the same kind of idea. The first expresses an object of thought; the second, Mary's, expresses an object of thought ; the third, white, expresses an attribute; the fourth, my eyes, expresses an object of thought; and the last two express attributes. We may conclude from this that all modifiers will express either objects of thought or attributes. The word which expresses an object of thought, we have called a substantive word, and the modifier which expresses an object of thought, we may call a substantive modifier. For the same reason, we may call a modifier which expresses an attribute an T^ An En^Usli Grammar &' attributive modifier. Thus, on the basis of the kind of idea which the}' express, we may divide all modifiers into two classes, substantive and at- tributive. A substantive modifier is a modifier which ex- presses an object of thought; as, Arnold, the traitor, zvas driven from J: is native country. An attributive modifier is' a modifier which expresses an attribute; as, The tall grass swayed in the wind. Exercise 19 In the following sentences point out all the modi- fiers and tell zvhether they are substantive or attrib- utive. Give your reason in each case. 1. The great plains are good grazing districts. 2. The girl gave her mother a knowing look. 3. The squirrel chattered from the bough of the oak tree. j\. The rabbit came forth from the thicket and listened. 5. I have killed the famous roebuck. 6. He comes because he is entertained. 7. The man is charitable In his way. 8. The apple is very sweet. 9. The girl is often tardy. 10. The stranger is charitable that he may receive praise. 11. The teacher is strict with her pupils. 12. The woman sells apples. 13. Conscience, our monitor, tells us when we are wrong. 14. The boy's story' was pitiful. 15. Were I Midas, I would make nothing else but just such golden days as these, over and over again, all the year throughout My best thoughts always come a little too TQ* Modifiers 79; late. Why did I not tell you how old King Midas came to America and changed the dusky autumn, such as it is in other countries, into the burnished beauty which it here puts on ? He gilded the leaves of the great volume of Nature. — Hawthorne. i6. Nobody knew how the fisherman brown, With a look of despair that was half a frown, Faced his fate on that furious night. Faced the mad billows with hunger white. Just within hail of a beacon light That shone on a woman fair and trim, Waiting for him. — Larcom. 45. The vSubstantive Modifier. Notice llic modifier in the sentence, Cicero, the orator, ar- raigned Catiline. The modifier, the orator, is sub- stantive, we notice first. In the second place it changes the meaning of the substantive word, Cicero. In the third place we notice that it ex- presses the same object of thought as is expressed by the word, Cicero, which it modifies, only it ex- presses it in a dififerent way. We call such a substantive modifier an apposi- tive modifier. An appositive modifier is a substantive modi- fier which changes the meaning of a substantive word by expressing the same object of thought in a different way; as, 77/?'.? Monument zvas Erected In Memory of PTJTJJP NOLAND. Lieutenant in the Army of the United States. 50 An English Grammar 46. The Possessive Modifier. Now notice the first modifier in the sentence, Wallace's book was exceedingly popular. We notice first that it is a substantive modi- fier. Second, it changes the meaning of the sub- stantive word, book. So far it is just like the ap- positive modifier. But we notice now that it does not express the same object of thought as is ex- pressed by the word which it modifies. It changes the meaning of the substantive word which it modi- fies by expressing the idea of possession. It shows who wrote the book. We call such a substantive modifier a posses- sive modifier. A possessive modifier is a substantive modi- fier which changes the meaning of a substantive word by expressing an idea of possession; as, The man's ntind was iindeveloped. 47. Direct Objective Modifier. In the sen- tence. The boy struck the ball, we see that the modifier, the ball, is also substantive. Here, how- ever, its resemblance to the appositive and the pos- sessive modifiers ceases, for it changes the meaning of the attributive wor 6., struck. We can see also that the object of thought expressed by the modifier, the ball, is directly af- fected by the attribute expressed by the word, Note: The word, fyossession, is here used in a sense broad enough to include ownership, authorship, origin, or kind. Modifiers 81 struck, which it modifies. In other words, that ob- ject of thought is the direct receiver of the attri- bute or the attribute goes out directly to that ob- ject of thought. The object of thought expressed by the modifier is the thing struck. We call such a substantive modifier a direct objective modifier. It always expresses the ob- ject of thought which is struck, bought, written, given, and so forth ; as, The boy shot the bird. The direct objective modifier, the bird, expresses the ob- ject which was shot, or it expresses the direct re- ceiver of the attribute, shooting. A direct objective modifier is a substantive modifier which changes the meaning of an attrib- utive word by expressing the direct receiver of the attribute; as, The girl brougJit the water. Write five sentences containing direct objective modifiers. 48. Indirect Objective Modifier. In the sen- tence, Mary brought her mother a drink of water, the direct objective modifier is the expression, a drink of water. It expresses the object of thought which was brought. The modifier, her mother, is also substantive. It changes the mean- ing of the attributive word, brought. In both these points it is like the direct objective modifier; but it does not express the object of thought which 82 An English Grammar ]\Iarv brought. The object of thought expressed by the modifier, Jier mother, is not directly affected by the attribute expressed by the word, brought. Herein it differs from the direct objective modifier. But the object of thought expressed by this modifier, her mother, is affected by the attribute expressed by the word, brought, which it modifies. The attribute goes out directly to the object of thought, a drink of water, l)ut the result of that comes to the other object of thought, Jier mother. This object of thought receives the result of the attribute. So that we may say that the object of thought expressed by the modifier, her mother, is indirectly affected by the attribute expressed by the word, brought, which it modifies. The effect of the attribute passes through the object of thought, a drink of water, to the other object of thought, her mother. That is the reason why we say it is indi- rectly affected. We call such a substantive modifier an indi- rect objective modifier. It always expresses the object of thought which receives the result of the buying, selling, reading, writing, and so forth; as> He sold his horse to William. The indirect object- ive modifier, William, expresses the object which re- ceives the result of the selling, or it expresses the indirect receiver of the attribute of selling. An indirect objective modifier is a substantive modifier which changes the meaning of an attrib- utive word by expressing the indirect receiver of Modifiers H3 the attribute; as, The teacher gave the boy good advice. Write -five sentences containing indirect object- ive modifiers. 49. Adverbial Objective Modifiers. In the sentence, The party zvalked home, the word, home, is a substantive modifier. It changes the meaning of the attributive word, zvalked. So far it is just hke the direct and indirect objective modifier. But the object of thought expressed by it is not in any way affected by the attribute expressed by the word, walked. Besides, this modifier, home, expresses the idea of place. In the case of other modifiers of this kind, we might find tliat they express time, distance, extent, and so on. \\> call these ad- verbial ideas 1)ecause the}' are most frequently expressed by the adverb or adverbial modifier. In the sentence, Harrison was president four years, it is easy to see that this modifier, four years, is just like the word, home, in the sentence before, in that it is substantive and expresses an adverbial idea. It expresses the adverbial idea of time. We note that it is not like the word, home, however, in that it changes the meaning of the relational word, was, instead of changing the meaning of an attributive word, as the modifier, home, does. We have here, then, a substantive modifier which changes the meaning of an attributive word or a relational word and alw^ays expresses 84 All Encrlish Grammar an adverbial idea. We call it an adverbial object- ive modifier l^ecaUvSe it is somewhat like a direct objective modifier and somewhat like an ad- verbial modifier. An adverbial objective modifier is a substan- tive modifier which changes the meaning of an attributive word or of a relational word by ex- pressing an adverbial idea; as, T. A lauf^h is worth a hundred groans in any market. 2. The bird bnilt her nest six inches above the door. Bring to class five sentences containing adverb- ial objective niodiiiers. Exercise 20 In the following sentences point out all the sub- stantive modifiers, tell zvhat kind each is, and give a reason : 1. The teacher gave the brightest pupil a reward. 2. The boy was tardy yesterday. 3. The river is a mile broad. 4. You should have come an hour sooner. 5. Mooween, the bear, is shy. 6. The wind blew the apples from the tree. 7. Orville's hand trembled as he held the cup. 8. His friend gave assistance to * Walter. 9. The man sought health. 10. Sunshine gives a plant strength. 11. Henry, the King, was absent. *Note: The preposition is frequently used with the indirect objective modifier; but it is not a part of the modifier. The indirect objective modifier here is the word, " Walter," not the expression, "to Walter." Modifiers . ^^ 12. Love thine enemies. 13. Wellington's victory was decisive. 14. Everything came to him marked by Nature, Right side up with care, and he kept it so. The world to him, as to all of us, was like a medal, on the obverse of which is stamped the image of Joy, and on the reverse that of Care. He never took the foolish pains to look at the other side, even if he knew of its existence. Lozvell 15. And the cares that infest the day Shall fold their tents like the Arabs, And as silently steal away. Lon<^feIIow 50. Attributive Modifiers. We have now to notice that attributive modifiers are not all alike. In the sentence, Quiet waters run deep, the modi- fier, quiet, is an attributive modifier because it ex- presses an attribute. The attribute expressed by it belongs to the object of thought, waters. It, there- fore, changes the meaning of the substantive word, zvaters. The attribute expressed by it is not an as- serted attrilnite. We call such an attributive modi- fier an adjective modifier. An adjective modifier is an attributive modi- fier which changes the meaning of a substantive word by expressing an * unasserted attribute of an object of thought ; as, It is a long lane that has no turning. Give five examples of adjective modifiers. *Note: The word, unasserted, is necessary in this definition to distinguish the adjective modifier from the predicate adjective, which is not a modifier and always expresses an asserted attribute; as Snow is ^white. 86 An English Grammar &' 51. Classes of Adjective Modifiers. Nor are all adjective modiiiers alike. In the sentence, The cold ice hnris my teeth, the adjective modifier, cold, does not narro^v the meaning- of the w^ord, ice, which it modifies, because there is no ice that is not cold. The chief purpose of this adjective modifier is to emphasize the attribute which it expresses. It sim- ply makes ])Uominent the attribute of the object of thouoht, ice, which does the hurting. Sometimes the adjective modifier does narrow the meaning of the word it modifies to some extent, but its chief purpose is still to emphasize the at- tribute which it expresses; as. These are beautiful days. Now, whenever the chief purpose of the ad- jective modifier is to emphasize or call attention to the attribute which it expresses, that is, when that is the object for which the author of the sen- tence has used it, we call it a descriptive adjective modifier. A descriptive adjective modifier is an adjective modifier whose chief purpose is to emphasize the attribute which it expresses; as, His father is an honest man. 52. Limiting Adjective Modifier. On the other hand, many adjective modifiers are used in some sentences to emphasize the attributes which they express; as. My father is a large man; and in Note: Pupils need not dwell long upon descriptive and limiting adjective modifiers. Modifiers ' 87 other sentences to narrow the meaning of the words which they modify; as, Large men are wanted on the police force. Whenever the chief purpose of an adjective modifier is to narrow the meaning of the word which it modifies, we call it a limiting adjective modifier. A limiting adjective modifier is an adjective modifier whose chief purpose is to narrow the meaning of the word which it modifies; as. These men are natives. Brave men do not run away in battle. Give five examples of limiting adjective modi- fiers and five of descriptive. Point out two descrip- tive and tzvo limiting adjective modifiers in the ex- tract from Hazvthorne's "My J-isit to Niagara", on page 68. 53. The Adverbial Modifier. Tn the sen- tence, The colonics grew rapidly, the word, rapidly, is an attributive modifier. It differs from the ad- jective modifier, however, in that it changes the meaning of the attributive word, grew. The attri- bute expressed by the modifier, rapidly, belongs to the attribute expressed by the word, grew. So that this modifier expresses an attribute of an attribute. Such an attributive modifier we call an adverbial modifier. This is not the only kind of a word to which an adverbial modifier can belong, however, as we shall 88 A)i English Grammar see if we examine the sentence, TJie story is cer- tainly a noz'el. Here the word, certainly, changes the meaning of the relational word, is. The at- tribute expressed by it belongs to the idea of rela- tion expressed by the word, is. So that this word, certainly, expresses an attribute of an idea of re- lation. Wq call this an adverbial modifier also. An adverbial modifier is an attributive modi- fier which changes the meaning of an attributive word or of a relational word by expressing an at- tribute of an attribute or an attribute of an idea of relation; as, The box soon returned. The story is perhaps a zi'ork of art. Write three examples of adverbial modifiers which belong to relational ivords and five zuhich be- long to attributive zvords. Find five examples of the adverbial modifier in White's "The 'Lunge," on page JS-- 54. Adverbial Ideas. We do not divide the adverbial modifier into classes, but we may easily see that they do not all express the same kind of idea. The most important adverbial ideas expressed by the adverbial modifier are as follows : 1. Time; as, My father came in the morning. 2. Place; as, His sister lives in the country. 3. Frequency; as, The boy is often tardy. 4. Purpose ; as. They came to help us. 5. Degree ; as, The horse is very black. Modifiers 89 6. Negation; as, The story is not true. 7. Doubt; as. The picture is perhaps tine art. 8. Necessity; as, The anszver is necessarily correct. 9. Certainty; as, He is surely right about it. 10. Condition; as, The boy 7vill come if you wish it. 11. Cause; as, The tiozvers arc zmthered because the sun is hot. 12. Reason; as, Tlie fiozvers are unthered for I saw them. 13. Manner; as, My friend ivalks rapidly. 14. Concession; as. Though you try, you zvill fail. 15. Extent; as, The horse ran to the end of the lane. 16. Direction; as, The doves flezv eastward. 17. Accompaniment; as, The prisoner escaped with his companions. 18. Instrumentality; as, The farmer cultivated his corn with a hoe. 19. Exclusion; as. The man is kind except to his horse. 20. Source; as. TJie stream Hows from the mountain. 21. Agency; as. The people zvere represented by these men. 22. Means; as. The bridge zvas built with the people's money. 23. Duration; as, Sonic must zvatch while others weep. Exercise 21 Poiuf out all the affribufiz'c modifiers in the fol- lozviiicr sentences. Tell zvhaf kind of attrihutive modifiers they are and give yonr reasons. Give the adverbial idea e.vpressed by each adverbial modifier: 1. McTiiiwhile the firing continued on hotli sides, though the Spaniards were evidently weakening. 2. The child was good in school. 3. He comes, because he is entertained. 90 An Eiwlis/i Graiiiniar is* 4. Still Cjil stood by the port rail. 5. The apple is very sweet. 6. The shots frequently rattled above his head. 7. The boy seldom winced. 8. The stranger is charitable that he may receive praise. 9. The teacher is strict with his pupils. 10. The boy went with his mother. 1 1 Gil went with the officers to headquarters. 12. The cistern has been filled irom the spout. 13. He would not give up his secret even if they tortured him. 14. The guard house was unlocked with the big key. 15. It is probably true. 16. The story is certainly interesting and perhaps true. 17. He traded with an Indian. 18. He built the house with his own money. 19. The demonstration is necessarily true. 20. The ground is not wet. 21. Roosevelt is at this time president. 22. When the shadows of evening fall, the sunbeams fly away. 23. Make hay while the sun shines. 24. The buttercup comes early in the spring. 25. The party walked home. 26. The bird built her nest six inches above the door. 27. We stood upon the ragged rocks When the long day was nearly done- Chapter IX THE ORGANIC PARTS OF THE SENTENCE 55. How They are Made Up. We have al- ready learned that the organic parts of the sen- tence are the subject, the predicate, and the copula. Since we now know different kinds of words and modifiers, we may understand how these organic parts are made up. In the sentence, Horses are animals, each part consists of a single word. In the sentence, The interesting story zvas certain ly told in a pleasing zvay, each part consists of more than one word. We can see, however, that there is one principal word in each part and that the other words belong to or modify this principal word or some word be- longing to it. For example, in this sentence, the word, story, is the principal part of the subject. It is modified by the word, the, a limiting adjective modifier ; and by the word, interesting, a descriptive adjective modifier. The principal part of the predicate is the word, told. It is modified by the expression, in a pleasing zvay, an adverbial modifier, expressing the adverbial idea of manner. The principal part of this modifier is the word, zvay. It is modified [91J 92 ,4ii English Grammar &' by the word, a, a limiting adjective modifier, and by the word, pleasing, a descriptive adjective modi- fier. The principal part of the copula is the word, was. It is modified by the word, certainly, an ad- verbial modifier expressing the adverbial idea of certainty. Thus we see that each organic part of the sen- tence consists of a principal part and its subordi- nate parts which are modifiers. The principal part of the subject is always a noun or a pronoun or some expression used substantively; as, Interesting books zvere furnished. He, himself, spoke to me. The principal part of the predicate ma}^ be substantive; as. This man is an excellent lawyer; or it may be attributive ; as, Birds sing sweetly. The woman zvas very kind. The principal part of the copula is always a relational word; as, TJic child is not zvell. Exercise 22 In the folloiving sentences point out the prin- cipal zvord in each organic part and explain the uses of the other zvords: 1. Tabby, the house cat, lay on a soft rug by the open dcxjf. 2. There was a robin's nest in that tree. 3. The tail feathers of these birds were a dark brown. 4. Presently the>' would come flyin An English Gramniar may have, and every kind of modifier ivhich each may take. Give the following points concerning each relational word in the sentences below: 1. Classify the word in the smallest known class. 2. Tell its exact use in the sentence. 3. Drazv a conclusion witJi regard to the class of zvords to 7i'hich it belongs. (See Section 59.) 4. Name all the modifiers of these relational words. 1. You are doubtless right. 2. The boy is devoted to his mother. 3. The tree stands just below the falls. 4. Harrison was president four years. 5. The boy lives two miles below the mill. 6. The teacher gave the book to Sarah. 7. Two and one are three, 8. The flower is red and white. 9. The arrow struck two inches below the center. State clearly all the uses and modifiers of rela- tional zvords in the simple sentence. Write one original example of each. Find an example of each use in the extract from Hazvthorne's ''My Visit to Niagara," on page 68. Exercise 27 In the follozving sentences will be found exam- ples of every kind of form word which can be used in the simple sentence, and every use which it may have. Give the follozving points concerning each form zvord in the sentences below: Tlic Simple Sentence l'*l 1. Classify flu zvord in the smallest known class. 2. Give its exact use in the sentence. 3. Drazv a conclusion with regard to the class of words to -cvJiicli it belongs. (See Section jO.) 1. Pooh ! I do not believe a word of it. 2. Alas ! what mortal terror we are in ! 3. Well, did you vote? 4. Now, I am sure he must be joking. 5. There is a pleasure in the pathless woods. 6. There have always been people longing to tell bad news. 7. There were three of us in the party. 8. There are ten boys in the class. Review Notice the effect of the use of the short, simple sentence in the follozving paragraph from Macaul- ay's ''Lord Clive". How many simple sentences are found in the paragraph? With what kind does it begin? With what kind does it close? Why? Which kind is more dignified? Which is clearer? During fifty days the siege went on. During fifty days the young captain maintained the defence, with a firmness, vigilance, and ability which would have done honor to the oldest marshal in Europe. The breach, however, increased day by day. The garrison began to feel the pressure of hunger. Under such circumstances, any troops so scantily provided with officers might have been expected to show signs of insubordination ; and the danger was peculiarly great in the force composed of men dififcring widely from each other in extraction, color, language, manners, and religion. 102 An Eiwlish Grammar Exercise 28 We should now be able to give a complete ex- planation of a simple sentence. Study the follow- ing simple sentences and be able to give the follow- ing points concerning them: 1. Give the sentence. 2. The thought expressed by it. 3. The elements of the thought. 4. The parts of the sentence. 5. Classify the sentence upon two bases. 6. Classify the ideas expressed by the zvords. 7. Classify the zvords, into their smallest known classes. 8. Name the principal word in the subject, predicate, and copula. Give all the modifiers. 9. Point out all the phrases, and classify them upon each basis. 1. What kind of people first inhabited England? 2. The ship left at sunrise. 3. Forbid it, Almighty God ! . 4. Sweet is the breath of morn. 5. There can be no natural desire of artificial good. 6. Why do you weave around you this thread of occu- pation ? 7. How oft the sight of means to do ill deeds makes ill deeds done ! 8. After to-morrow is the bane of many a life. 9. Old John of Gaunt is grievous sick, my lord. 10. Give each of us his share. 11. To Thee we bow, Friend, Father, King of Kings! Tlic Simple Sentence 103 12. Oh soul ! be changed into small water drops. 13. Pride goeth before destruction. 14. Break, break, break, On thy cold, gray stones, O Sea ! — Tennyson. 15. The meeting points the sacred hairs dissever From her fair head forever and forever. — Pope. 16. Night, sable goddess, from her ebon throne, In ray less majesty, now stretches forth Her leaden scepter, o'er a slumbering world. — Yonng. 17. Every man has within himself a continent of undis- covered character. — Stephen. 18. From peak to peak, the rattling crags among. Leaps the live thunder. — Byron. 19. And like the wings of sea-birds Flash the white-caps of the sea. — Longfellow. 20. Marbles forget their message to mankind. — Holmes. Work in Composition TJie Review A SELECTION FROM " SAUL " "Oh. our manhood's prime vigor! No spirit feels waste, Not a muscle is stopped in its playing nor sinew unbraced. Oh. the wild joy? of living! the leaping from rock u]) to rock, The strong rending of boughs from the fir-tree, the cool silver shock Of the plunge in a pool's living water, the hunt of the bear. And the sultriness showing the Hon is couched in his lair. And the meal, the rich dates yellowed over with gold dust, divine. 1(»4 An English Grammor And tlir lociist-tlcsli steeped in the pitcher, tlie fnll dratipjht of wine, And the slee]) in the (h'ied river-channel where l)ulrushes tell That the water was wont to go warbling so softly and well. How good is man's life, the mere living ! how fit to employ All the heart and the soul and the senses forever in joy! — -Robert Broicuino-. TJii's song from "Saul" ivas sung by a shcplicrd box to a great king who, because of his wrong do- ing, had lost all interest in life. He had fallen into a stupor from zvhich no one could rouse him. Read the poem and determine why the young musician chose this song to sing before the king. Uliat is the subject of the song? What joys of "mere liimig" are named? Choose an appropriate title for the selection. JVrite a review one paragraph long zvhich will so characterise the poem that a person who had never read it zvould get a clear idea of its spirit, its sub- ject, and the other. means zvhich the author has used to show his purpose. A Title should suggest the topic of a selection in a few words. A Review aims to so describe a poein, article or book that a clear idea of its character and content is given. Read your paper. Does your title express the topic briefly? Have you made your meaning clear? Does your paragraph deal zvith one topic only? The Simple Sentence i05 Have you found your sentence endings? Have you chosen the best possible zvords to express your nieaniuQ? All the words of a title should begin with cap- ital letters except prepositions, articles and con- junctions which should not begin with capitals, unless used as the first word of the title. The titles of books, poems, stories or pictures should be inclosed with quotation marks when used within a sentence. ROBIX HOOD AND ALLIN A DALE. Come listen to me, you gallants so free. All you that love mirth for to hear, And I will tell you of a bold outlaw, That lived in Nottinghamshire. As Robin Hood in the forest stood. All under the green-wood tree. There he was aware of a brave young man, As fine as fine might be. The youngster was cloathed in scarlet red, Tn scarlet fine and gay ; .\nd he did frisk it over the plain, And chanted a roundelay. As Rol)in Hood next morning stdod, .Amongst the leaves so gay, There did he esiJ\- the same young man Come