GIFT OF MICHAEL REE.SE The r. "Francis Z. /We/ * 8. Serial. THH Price, 10 Ots. LPIT AND ROSTRUM. , ^oputuv fortuities, to., IOGRAPHICALLY REPORTED BY ANDREW j. GRAHAM AND CHAS. B. COLLAR. aiiiel AN ORATION, BY THE HON. EDWARD EVERETT, ON THE OCCASION OF THE Mention of the Statue of Ufa. Wrtflter, to jt*n, SEPTEMBER 17TH, 1859. NEW YORK: P U B L I S 11 K 1) T> Y II. II. LLOYD & C O., 12 AITLKTON S Brn.i.iNO, Xo. "IS BROADWAY. >ber 15th, 1859. THE PULPIT AND ROSTRUM, AN ELEGANT SERIAL IN PAMPHLET FORM, CONTAINS OF THE BEST SERMONS, POPULAR LECTURES, OBATIONS, ETC. ANDREW J. GRAHAM and CHARLES B. COLLAR, Reporters and Editors. TWELVE NUMBERS, $1 00 IN ADVANCE ; SINGLE NUMBER, 10 CENTS. THE special object in the publication of this Serial, is to preserve in convenient form the best thoughts of our most gifted men, just as they come from their lips ; thus retaining their freshness and personality. Great favor has already been shown the work, and its long continuance is certain. The successive numbers will be issued as often as Discourses worthy a place in the Serial can be found ; out of the many reported, we hope to elect twelve each year. EIGHT NUMBERS ARE READY. No. 8. EDWAED EVERETT S ORATION at the Inauguration of the Statue of Daniel Webster, at Boston, Sept. 17, 1859. This is justly regarded as one of Mr. Everett s greatest efforts. No. 7. COMING TO CHRIST. The last sermon in the celebrated Academy of Music Course. By Rev. HENRY MARTIN SCUDDER, M.D., D.D., Missionary to India. No. 6. THE TRIBUTE TO HUMBOLDT ; being the interesting and scholarly Addresses on the career of the great Cosmopolitan, by Hon. GEO. BANCROFT, Rev. Dr. THOMPSON, Profs. AGASSIZ, LTEBER, BACHE, and GUYOT. jfo. 6. The Great Sermon of Rev. A. KINGMAN NOTT (recently deceased), on JESUS AND THE RESURRECTION, delivered in the Academy of Music, New York, February 13, 1859. No. 4. THE PROGRESS AND DEMANDS OF CHRISTIANITY. By the Rev. WM. H. MILBURN (the blind preacher). With an interesting Biographical Sketch. No. 3. The eloquent Discourse of Prof. 0. M. MITCHELL, of the Cincinnati Obser vatory, on the GREAT UNFINISHED PROBLEMS OF THE UNIVERSE. No. 2. The celebrated Addresses of the Rev. HENRY WARD BEECHER and JAMES T. BRADY, Esq., on MENTAL CULTURE FOR WOMEN. No. 1. The Rev. T. L. CUYLER S Sermon on CHRISTIAN RECREATION AND UNCHRISTIAN AMUSEMENT. Numbers are promptly mailed from the office, on receipt of the price. H, H. LLOYD & CO., Publishers, 13 Appletoii g Building, 348 Broartway, New York. 177 DANIEL WEBSTER. Oration delivered by the lion. Edward Everett, on the occasion of the dedication of the Statue of Mr. Webster, in Boston, Sept. \lth, 1859. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY : Ox behalf of those by whose contributions this statue of Mr. Webster has been procured, and of the committee intrusted with the care of its erection, it is my pleasing duty to return to you, and through you to the Legislature of the Commonwealth, our dutiful acknowledgments for the permission kindly accorded to us, to place the Statue in the Public Grounds. We feel, sir, that in allowing this monumental work to be erected in front of the Capitol of the State, a distinguished honor has been paid to the memory of Mr. Webster. To you, sir, in particular, whose influence was liberally employ ed to promote this result, and whose personal attendance and par ticipation have added so much to the interest of the day, we are under the highest obligations. To you, our distinguished guests, and to you, fellow-citizens, of either sex, who come to unite with us in rendering these monu mental honors, who adorn the occasion with your presence, and cheer us with your countenance and favor, we tender a respectful and grateful welcome. To you, also, Mr. Mayor, and to the City Council, we return our cordial thanks for your kind consent to act on our behalf, in deliv ering this cherished memorial of our honored fellow-citizen into the custody of the Commonwealth, and for your sympathy and assist ance in the duties of the occasion. It has been the custom, from the remotest antiquity, to preserve and to hand down to posterity, in bronze and in marble, the coun terfeit presentment of illustrious men. "Within the last few years modern research has brought to light, on the banks of the Tigris, huge slabs of alabaster, buried for ages, which exhibit in relief the faces and the persons of men who governed the primeval East in the gray dawn of History. Three thousand years have elapsed since they lived and reigned, and built palaces, and fortified cities, and waged war, and gained victories, of which the trophies are carved upon these monumental tablets the triumphal procession, the chariots laden with spoil, the drooping captive, the conquered monarch in chains, but the legends inscribed upon the stone are imperfectly deciphered, and little beyond the names of the person ages, and the most general tradition of their exploits is preserved. 269564 178 DANIEL WEBSTER. In like manner the obelisks and the temples of ancient Egypt arc covered with the sculptured images of whole dynasties of Pharaohs older than Moses, older than Joseph whose titles are recorded in the hieroglyphics with which the granite is charged, and which are gradually yielding up their long concealed mysteries to the sagacity of modern criticism. The plastic arts, as they passed into Hellas, with all the other arts which give grace and dignity to our nature, reached a perfection unknown to Egypt or Assyria; and the heroes and sages of Greece and Rome, immortalized by the sculptor, still people the galleries and museums of the modern world. In every succeeding age and in every country, in which the fine arts have been cultivated, the respect and aifection of sur vivors have found a pure and rational gratification in the historical portrait and the monumental statue of the honored and loved in private life, and especially of the great and good who have deserved W T ell of their country. Public esteem and confidence and private affection, the gratitude of the community and the fond memories of the fire-side, have ever sought, in this way, to prolong the sensi ble existence of their beloved and respected objects. What though the dear and honored features and person, on which while living we never gazed without tenderness or veneration, have been taken from us something of the loveliness, something of the majesty abides in the portrait, the bust, and the statue. The heart bereft of the living originals turn to them, and cold and silent as they are, they strengthen and animate the cherished recollections of the loved, the honored, and the lost. The skill of the painter and sculptor, which thus comes in aid of the memory and imagination, is, in its highest degree, one of the rarest, as it is one of the most exquisite accomplishments within our attainment, and in its perfection as seldom witnessed as the per fection of speech or of music. The plastic hand must be moved by the same ethereal instinct as the eloquent lips or the recording pen. The number of those who, in the language of Michael Angelo, can discern the finished statue in the heart of the shapeless block, and bid it start into artistic life who are endowed with the ex quisite gift of molding the rigid bronze or the lifeless marble into graceful, majestic, and expressive forms is not greater than the number of those who are able, with equal majesty, grace, and ex pressiveness, to make the spiritual essence the finest shades of thought and feeling sensible to the mind, through the eye and the ear, in the mysterious embodiment of the written and the spoken word. If Athens in her palmiest days had but one Pericles, she had also but one Phidias. Nor are these beautiful and noble arts, by which the face and the form of the departed are preserved to us calling into the highest exercise as they do all the imitative and idealizing powers of the painter and the sculptor the least instructive of our teachers. The portraits and the statues of the honored dead kindle the gener- DANIEL WEBSTER. 179 ous ambition of the youthful aspirant to fame. Themistocles could not sleep for the trophies in the Ceramicus; and when the livinjr Demosthenes, to whom you, sir [Mr. FeltonJ, have alluded, hyd ceased to speak, the stony lips remained to rebuke and exhort his degenerate countrymen. More than a hundred years have elapsed since the great Newton passed aw r ay; but from age to age his statue by lioubillac, in the ante-chapel of Trinity College, will give distinctness to the conceptions formed of him by hundreds and thousands of ardent youthful spirits, tilled with reverence for that transcendent intellect, which, from the phenomena that lall within our limited vision, deduced the imperial law by which the Sover eign Mind rules the entire universe. We can never look on the person of Washington, but his serene and noble countenance, per petuated by the pencil and the chisel, is familiar to far greater mul titudes than ever stood in his living presence, and will be thus familiar to the latest generation. What parent, as he conducts his son to Mount Auburn or to Bun ker Hill, will not, as he pauses before their monumental statues, seek to heighten his reverence for virtue, for patriotism, for science, for learning, for devotion to the public good, as he bids him con template the form of that grave and venerable Winthrop, who left his pleasant home in England to come and found a new republic in this untrodden wilderness ; of that ardent and intrepid Otis, who first struck out the spark of American Independence ; of that noble Adams, its most eloquent champion on the floor of Congress ; of that martyr Warren, who laid down his life in its defense ; of that self-taught Bowditch, who, without a guide, threaded the starry mazes of the heavens ; of that Story, honored at home and abroad as one of the brightest luminaries of the law, and by a felicity, of which I believe there is no other example, admirably portrayed in marble by his son ? What citizen of Boston, as he accompanies the stranger around our streets, guiding him through our busy thorough tares, to our wharfs crowded with vessels which range every sea and gather the produce of every climate up to the dome of this Capitol, which commands as lovely a landscape as can delight the eye or gladden the heart, will not, as he calls his atten tion at last to the statues of Franklin and Webster, exclaim " Boston takes pride in her natural position, she rejoices in her beautiful environs, she is gratelul for her material prosperity ; but richer than the merchandise stored in palatial warehouses, greener than the slopes of sea-girt islets, lovelier than this encircling pan orama of laud and sea, of field and hamlet, of lake and stream, of garden and grove, is the memory of her sons, native and adopted ; the character, services, and fame of those who have benefited and adorned their day and generation. Our children, and the schools at which they are trained, our citizens, and the services they have rendered; these are our jewels, these our abiding treasures." Yes, your long rows of quarried granite may crumble to the 180 DANIEL WEBSTER. dust ; the cornfields in yonder villages, ripening to the sickle, may, like the plains of stricken Lombardy, a few weeks ago, be kneaded into bloody clods by the madding wheels of artillery; this popu lous city, like the old cities of Etruria and the Campagna liomana, may be desolated by the pestilence which walketh in darkness, may decay with the lapse of time, and the busy mart, which now rings with the joyous din of trade, become as lonely and still as Carthage or Tyre, as Babylon and Nineveh ; but the names of the great and good shall survive the desolation and the ruin ; the mem ory of the wise, the brave, the patriotic, shall never perish. Yes, Sparta is a wheat-field ; a Bavarian prince holds court at the foot of the Acropolis ; the traveling virtuoso digs for marbles in the Roman Forum, and beneath the ruins of the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus; but Lycurgus and Leonidas, and Miltiades and De mosthenes, and Cato and Tully u still live ;" and HE still lives, and all the great and good shall live in the heart of ages, while marble and bronze shall endure; and when marble and bronze have perished, they shall " still live" in memory, so long as men shall reverence Law, and honor Patriotism, and love Liberty ! EULOGIES AT THE TIME OF ME. WEBSTEE s DECEASE. Seven years, within a few weeks, have passed since he, whose statue we inaugurate to-day, was taken from us. The voice of re spectful and affectionate eulogy, which was uttered in this vicinity and city at the time, was promptly echoed throughout the country. The tribute paid to his memory, by friends, neighbors, and fellow- citizens, was responded to from the remotest corners of the Repub lic, by those who never gazed on his noble countenance, or listened to the deep melody of his voice. This city, which in early man hood he chose for his home; his associates in the honorable profession of which he rose to be the acknowledged head ; the law school of the neighboring university speaking by the lips of one so well able to do justice to his legal pre-eminence; the college at which he was educated, and whose chartered privileges he had suc cessfully maintained before the highest tribunal of the country ; with other bodies and other eulogists, at the bar, in the pulpit, and on the platform, throughout the Union, in numbers greater, I believe, than have ever spoken on any other similar occasion, ex cept that of the death of Washington, joined with the almost unanimous press of the country, in one chorus of admiration of his talents, recognition of his patriotic services, and respect and affection for his memory. Nor have these offerings been made at his tomb alone. Twice or thrice since his death, once within a few months the anniver sary of his birthday has called forth, at the table of patriotic festivity, the voice of fervid eulogy and affectionate commemora tion. In this way, and on these occasions, his character has been delineated by those best able to do justice to his powers and attain- DANIEL WEBSTER. J^J ments, to appreciate his services, to take the measure, if I may so say, of his colossal mental stature. Without going heyond this immediate neighborhood, and in no degree ungrateful for the liber ality, or insensible to the ability with which he has been eulogized in other parts of the country, what need be said, what can be said in the hearing of those who have listened to Ilillard, to Chief Jus tice Parker, to Gushing, and to our lamented Ghoate, whose dis course on Mr. Webster at Dartmouth College appears to me as magnificent a eulogium as was ever pronounced ? What can be said that has not been better said before; what need be said now that seven added years in the political progress of the country, seven years of respectful and affectionate recollec tion on the part of those who now occupy the stage, have con firmed his title to the large place which, while he lived, he tilled in the public mind ? While he yet bore a part in the councils of the Union, he shared the fate which, in all countries, and especially in all free countries, awaits commanding talent and eminent position ; which no great man in our history not Washington himself has ever escaped ; which none can escape, but those who are too feeble to provoke opposition, too obscure for jealousy. But now that he has rested for years in his honored grave, what generous nature is not pleased to strew flowers on the sod ? What honorable op ponent, still faithful to principle, is not willing that all in which he differed from him should be referred, without bitterness, to the impartial arbitrament of time ; and that all that he respected and loved should be cordially remembered ? What public man, especially, who, with whatever differences of judgment of men or measures, has borne on his own shoulders the heavy burden of responsibility who has felt how hard it is, in the larger complications of affairs, at all times to meet the expectations of an intelligent and watchful, but impulsive and not always thoroughly instructed public ; how difficult sometimes to satisfy his own judgment is not willing that the noble qualities and patriotic services of Webster should be honorably recorded in the book of the country s remembrance, and his statue set up in the Pantheon of her illustrious sons ? POSTHUMOUS HONORS. These posthumous honors lovingly paid to departed worth are among the compensations which a kind Providence vouchsafes for the unavoidable conflicts of judgment and stern collisions of party, which make the political career always arduous, even when pur sued with the greatest success, generally precarious, sometimes destructive of health and even life. It is impossible under free gov ernments to prevent the existence of party ; not less impossible that parties should be conducted with spirit and vigor without more or less injustice done and suffered, more or less gross un- charitableness and bitter denunciation. Besides, with the utmost effort at impartiality, it is not within the competence of our frail 182 DANIEL WEBSTER. capacities to do full justice at the time to a character of varied and towering greatness, engaged in an active and responsible political career. The truth of his principles, the wisdom of his counsels, the value of his services must be seen in their fruits, and the richest fruits are not those of the most rapid growth. The wisdom of an tiquity pronounced that no one was to be deemed happy until after death ; not merely because he was then first placed beyond the vicissitudes of human fortune, but because then only the* rival in terests, the discordant judgments, the hostile passions of cotem- poraries are, in ordinary cases, no longer concerned to question his merits. Horace, with gross adulation, "sung to his imperial master, Augustus, that he alone of the great of the earth ever received while living the full meed of praise. All the other great bene factors of mankind, the inventors of arts, the destroyers of mon sters, the civilizers of states, found by experience that unpopularity was appeased by death alone.* That solemn event, which terminates the material existence, be comes by the sober revisions of cotemporary judgment, aided by offices of respectful and affectionate commemoration, the com mencement of a nobler life on earth. The wakeful eyes are closed, the feverish pulse is still, the tired and trembling limbs are relieved from their labors, and the aching head is laid to rest on the lap of its mother earth, like a play-worn child at the close of a summer s day ; but all that we honored and loved in the living man begins to live again in a new and higher being of influence and fame. It was given but to a limited number to listen to the living voice, and they can never listen to it again ; but the wise teachings, the grave admonitions, the patriotic exhortations which fell from his tongue will be gathered together and garnered up in the memory of mil lions. The cares, the toils, the sorrows; the conflicts with others, the conflicts of the fervent spirit with itself; the sad accidents of humanity, the fears of the brave, the follies of the wise, the errors of the learned ; all that dashed the cup of enjoyment with bitter drops and strewed sorrowful ashes over the beauty of expectation and promise ; the treacherous friend, the ungenerous rival, the mean and malignant foe ; the uncharitable prejudice which with held the just tribute of praise, the human frailty which wove sharp thorns into the wreath of solid merit ; all these in ordinary cases are buried in the grave of the illustrious dead ; while their brilliant talents, their deeds of benevolence and public spirit, their wise and eloquent words, the healing counsels, their generous aflcctions, the whole man, in short, whom we revered and loved and would fain imitate, especially when his image is impressed upon our recollec tions by the pencil or the chisel, goes forth to the admiration of the latest posterity. Extinctus amabiter idem. * Comperit invidiam supremo fine, domari . DANIEL WEBSTER. 183 THE OBSEQUIES OF MR. CIIOATE. Our city has lately witnessed a most beautiful instance of this re-animating power of death* A few weeks since, we followed Toward the tomb the lifeless remains of our lamented Choate. Well may we consecrate a moment even of this hour to him who, in that admirable discourse to which I have already alluded, did such noble justice to himself and the great subject of his eulogy. A short time before the decease of our much honored friend, I had seen him shattered by disease, his nil-persuasive voice faint and languid, his beaming eye quenched ; and as he left us in search of health in a foreign clime, a painful image and a sad foreboding too soon fulfilled dwelt upon my mind. But on the morning of the day when we were to pay the last sad offices to our friend, the 23d of July, with a sad, let me not say a repining, thought, that so much talent, so much learning, so much eloquence, so much wit, so much wisdom, so much force of intellect, so much kindness of heart were taken from us, an engraved likeness of him was brought to me, in which he seemed to live again. The shadows of disease and suffering had passed from the brow, the well-re membered countenance was clothed with its wonted serenity, a cheerful smile lighted up the features, genius kindled in the eye, persuasion hovered over the lips, and I felt as if I was going, not to his funeral, but his triumph. " Weep not for me," it seemed to say, u but weep for yourselves." And never while he dwelt among us in the feeble tabernacle of the flesh ; never while the overtasked spirit seemed to exhaust the delicate frame ; never as I had listened to the melody of his living voice, did he speak to my imagination and heart with such a touching though silent eloquence, as when we followed his hearse along these streets, that bright mid-summer s noon, up the via sacra in front of this Capitol, slowly moving to the solemn beat of grand dead marches, as they swelled from wailing clarion and muffled drum, while the minute guns from yonder lawn responded to the passing bell from yonder steeple. I then understood the sublime signifi cance of the words, which Cicero puts in the mouth of Cato, that the mind, elevated to the foresight of posterity, when departing from this life, begins at length to live; yea, the sublimer words of a greater than Cicero, " Oh, death! where is thy sting? oh, grave! where is thy victory?" And then, as we passed the abodes of those whom he knew, and honored, and loved, and who had gone before ; of Lawrence here on the left ; of Prescott yonder on the right ; this home where Hancock lived and AVashington was re ceived; this where Lafayette sojourned; this Capitol where his own political course began, and on which so many patriotic mem ories are concentrated, I felt, not as if we were conducting another frail and weary body to the tomb, but as if we were escorting a noble brother to the congenial company of the departed great and good; and I was ready myself to exclaim, " prceclarum diem, cum ad 184 DANIEL WEBSTER. illud divinum animorum concilium ccetumque profisciscar, cumque ex Jiac turbo, ct collumone discedam" THE PEEIOD IN WHICH ME. WEBSTER LIVED. It will not, I think, be expected of me to undertake the super fluous task of narrating in great detail the well-known events of Mr. Webster s life, or of attempting an elaborate delineation of that character to which such ample justice has already been done by master hands. I deem it sufficient to say in general, that, referred to all the standards by which public character can be estimated, he exhibited in a rare degree the qualities of a truly great man. The period at which Mr. Webster came forward in life, and during which he played so distinguished a part, was not one in which small men, dependent upon their own exertions, are likely to rise to a high place in public estimation. The present genera tion of young men are hardly aware of the vehemence of the storms that shook the world at the time when Mr. Webster became old enough to form the first childish conceptions of the nature of the events in progress at home and abroad. His recollections, he tells us in an autobiographical sketch, went back to the year 1790 a year when the political system of continental Europe was about to plunge into a state of frightful disintegration, while, under the new constitution, the United States were commencing an unexampled career of prosperity ; Washington just entering upon the first Pres idency of the new-born Eepublic ; the reins of the oldest monarchy in Europe slipping, besmeared with blood, from the hands of the descendant of thirty generations of kings. The fearful struggle between France and the allied powers succeeded, Avhich strained the resources of the European governments to their utmost tension. Armies and navies were arrayed against each other such as the civ ilized world had never seen before, and wars waged beyond all for mer experience. The storm passed over the Continent as a tornado passes through a forest, when it comes rolling and roaring from the clouds, and prostrates the growth of centuries in its path. England, in virtue of her insular position, her naval power, and her free institutions, had more than any other foreign country weathered the storm ; but Russia saw the arctic sky lighted with the flames of her old Muscovite capital ; the shadowy Kaisers of the House of Hapsburg were compelled to abdicate the crown of the Holy Eoman Empire, and accept as a substitute that of Austria ; Prussia, staggering from Jena, trembled on the verge of political annihilation; the other German states, Italy, Switzerland, Hol land, and the Spanish Peninsula were convulsed ; Egypt overrun; Constantinople and the East threatened ; and in many of these states, institutions, laws, ideas, and manners were changed as ef fectually as dynasties. With the downfall of Napoleon a partial reconstruction of the old forms took place ; but the political genius of the continent of Europe was revolutionized. DANIEL WEBSTEE. 185 On this side of tho Atlantic, the United States, though studying an impartial neutrality, were drawn at first to some extent into the outer circles of the terrific maelstrom ; but soon escaping, they started upon a career of national growth and development, of which the world has witnessed no other example. Meantime, the Spanish and the Portuguese Yiceroyalties south of us, from Mexico to Cape Horn, asserted their independence, that Castilian empire on which the sun never set was dismembered, and the golden chain was forever sundered, by which Columbus had linked half his new found world to the throne of Ferdinand and Isabella. Such was the crowd and the importance of the events in which, from his childhood up, the life of Mr. Webster, and of the genera tion to which he belonged was passed, and I can with all sincerity say, that it has never been my fortune, in Europe or America, to hold intercourse with any person who seemed to me to penetrate further than he had done into the spirit of the age, under its successive phases of dissolution, chaos, reconstruction, and prog ress. Born and bred on the verge of the wilderness (his father a veteran of those old French and Indian wars, in which, in the middle of the 18th century, wild men came out of the woods to wage war with the tomahawk and the scalping-knife, against the fireside and the cradle), with the slenderest opportunities for early education, entering life with scarce the usual facilities for reading the riddle of foreign state-craft, remote from the scene of action, relying upon sources of information equally open to all the world, he seemed to me nevertheless, by the instinct of a great capacity, to have comprehended in all its aspects the march of events in Europe -and this country. He surveyed the agitations of the age with calmness, deprecated its excesses, sympathized with its pro gressive tendencies, rejoiced in its triumphs. His first words in Congress, when he came unannounced from his native hills in 1813, proclaimed his mastery of the perplexed web of European politics, in which the United States were then but too deeply en tangled ; and from that time till his death I think we all felt those who differed from him as well as those who agreed with him that he was in no degree below the standard of the time ; that if Providence had cast his lot in the field where the great des tinies of Europe are decided, this poor New Hampshire youth would have carried his head as higk among the Metternichs, the Nesselrodes, the Hardenbergs, the Talleyrands, the Castlereaghs of the day, and surely among their successors, who now occupy the stage, as he did among his cotemporaries at home. HIS COTEMPOEARIES. Let me not be thought, however, in this remark, to intimate that these cotemporaries at home were second-rate men ; far otherwise. It has sometimes seemed to me that, owing to the natural reverenco in which we hold the leaders of tho Revolutionary period the 16 DANIEL WEBSTER. heroic age of the country and those of the constitutional age who brought out of chaos this august system of confederate republican ism, we hardly do full justice to the third period in our political history, which may be dated from about the time when Mr. Web ster came into political life and continued through the first part of his career. The heroes and sages of the revolutionary and consti tutional period were indeed gone, Washington, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Morris, Jay slept in their honored graves. John Adams, Jefferson, Carroll, though surviving, were withdrawn from affairs. <| But Madison, who contributed so much to the formation and adoption of the constitution, was at the helm ; Monroe in the cabinet ; John Quincy Adams, Gallatin, and Bayard negotiating in Europe ; in the Senate were Rufus King, Christopher Gore, Jer emiah Mason, Giles, Otis ; in the House of Representatives, Pinck- ney, Clay, Lowndes, Cheves, Calhoun, Gaston,, Forsyth, Randolph, Oakley, Pitkin, Grosvenor ; on the bench of the Supreme Court, Marshall, Livingston, Story ; at the bar, Dexter, Emmet, Pinkney, and Wirt ; with many distinguished men not at that time in the general government, of whom it is enough to name Dewitt Clinton and Chancellor Kent. It was my privilege to see Mr. Webster, associated and mingling with nearly all those eminent men, and their successors, not only in later years, but in my own youth, and when he first came forward, unknown as yet to the country at large, scarcely known to himself, not arrogant, nor yet unconscious of his mighty powers, tied to a laborious profession in a narrow range of practice, but glowing with a generous ambition, and not afraid to grapple with the strongest and boldest in the land. The opinion pronounced of him, at the commencement of his career, by Mr. Lowndes, that the " South had not in Congress his superior nor the North his equal," savors in the form of expression of sectional partiality. If it had been said, that neither at the South or the North had any public man risen more rapidly to a brilliant reputa tion, no one I think would have denied the justice of the remark. He stood from the first the acknowledged equal of the most distin guished of his associates. In later years he acted with the suc cessors of those I have named, with Benton, Burgess, Edward Liv ingston, Hayne, McDufiie, McLean, Sergeant, Clayton, Wilde, Storrs, our own Bates, Davis, Gorham, Choate, and others who still survive; but it will readily be admitted that he never sunk from the position which he assumed at the outset of his career, or stood second to any man in any part of the country. \ THE QUESTIONS DISCUSSED IN HIS TIME. If we now look for a moment at the public questions with which he was called to deal in the course of his career, and with which he did deal, in the most masterly manner, as they succes sively came up, we shall find new proofs of his great ability. When he first came forward in life, the two great belligerent DANIEL WEBSTER. 187 powers of Europe, contending with each other for the mastery of the world, despising our youthful weakness and impatient of our gainful neutrality, in violation now admitted of the Law of Nations, emulated each other in the war waged upon our com merce and the insults offered to our Hag. To engage in a contest with both would have been madness; the choice of the antagonist was a question of difficulty, and well calculated to furnish topics of reproach and recrimination. Whichever side you adopted, your opponent regarded you as being, in a great national struggle, the apologist of an unfriendly foreign power, (in 1798 the United States chose France for their enemy ; in 1812 Great Britain. War was declared against the latter country on the 18th of June, 1812; the Orders in Council, which were the immediate cause of the war, were rescinded five days afterward. Such are the narrow chances on which the Fortunes of States depend L^iJ /^tjrreat questions of domestic and foreign policy followed the close of war. Of the former class were the restoration of a cur rency which should truly represent the values which it nominally circulated a result mainly brought about by a resolution moved by Mr. Webster ; the fiscal system of the Union and the best mode of connecting the collection, safe-keeping, and disbursement of the public funds, with the commercial wants, and especially with the exchanges of the country ; the stability of the manufac tures, which had been called into existence during the war; what can constitutionally be done, ought anything as a matter of policy to be done by Congress to protect them from the competition of foreign skill, and the glut of foreign markets ; the internal com munications of the Umon, a question of paramount interest before the introduction of Railroads; can the central power do any thing what can it do by roads and canals, to bind the distant parts of the continent together; the enlargement of- the judicial system of the country to meet the wants of the greatly increased number of the States ; the revision of the criminal code of the United States, which was almost exclusively his work; the ad ministration of the public lands and the best mode of filling with civilized and Christian homes this immense domain, the amplest heritage which was ever subjected to the control of a free government; connected with the public domain the relations of the civilized and dominant race to the aboriginal children of the soil; and lastly the constitutional questions on the nature of the government itself, which were raised in that gigantic controversy on the interpretation of the fundamental law itself. These were some of the most important domestic questions which occupied the attention of Congress and the country while Mr. Webster was on the stage. Of questions connected with Foreign affairs were those growing out of the war, which was in progress when he first became a member of Congress ; then the various questions of International 188 DANIEL WEBSTER. Law, some of them as novel as they were important, which had reference to the entrance or the attempted entrance of so many new states into the family of nations ; in Europe Greece, Bel gium, Hungary ; on this continent, twelve or fourteen new repub lics, great and small, bursting from the ruins of the Spanish colonial empire like a group of asteroids from the wreck of an exploded planet; the invitation of .the infant American Republics to meet them in Congress at Panama ; our commercial relations with the British Colonies in the West Indies and on this con tinent ; demands of several European states for spoliations on our commerce during the wars of the French Revolution ; our secular controversy with England relative to the boundary of the United States on the North-Eastern and Pacific frontiers ; our relations with Mexico, previous to the war ; the immunity of the American flag upon the common jurisdiction of the ocean ; and more im portant than all other questions, foreign or domestic, in its influence upon the general politics of the country, the great sectional controversy not then first commenced, but greatly in creased in warmth and urgency, which connected itself with the organization of the newly acquired Mexican territories. Such were the chief questions on which it was Mr. Webster s duty to form opinions ; as an influential member of Congress and a political leader to speak and to vote ; as a member of the Execu tive Government to exercise a powerful, over some of them, a de cisive control. Besides these there was another class of questions of great public importance, which came up for adjudication in the Courts of the United States, which he was called professionally to discuss. Many of the questions of each class now referred to di vided and still divide opinion ; excited and still excite the feelings of individuals, of parties, of sections of the countrvjf There are some of them, which, in the course of a long life, unaer changing circumstances, are likely to be differently viewed at different peri ods by the same individual. I am not here to-day to rake off the warm ashes from the embers of controversies which have spent their fury and are dying away, or to fan the fires of those which etill burn. But no one, I think, whether he agreed with Mr. Web ster or differed from him as to any of these questions, will deny that he treated them each and all, as they came up in the Senate, in the Courts, or in negotiations with Foreign powers, in a broad, statesmanlike, and masterly way. There were few who would not confess, when they agreed with him, that he had expressed their opinions better than they could do it themselves ; few, when they differed from him, who would not admit that he had maintained his own views manfully, powerfully, and liberally. HIS CAREER AS A STATESMAN. Such was the period in which Mr. Webster lived, such were the associates with whom he acted, the questions with which he had DANIEL WEBSTER. 189 to deal as statesman, jurist, the head of an administration of the government, and a public speaker. Let us contemplate him for a moment in either capacity. > "Without passing through the preliminary stage of the State Leg- islature, and elected to Congress in six years from the time of his admission to the Superior Court of New Hampshire, he was, on his first entrance into the House of Representatives, placed by Mr. Speaker Clay on the Committee of Foreign Affairs, and took rank forthwith as one of the leading statesmen of the day. His lirst speech had reference to those famous Berlin and Milan decrees and Orders in Council, to which I have already alluded; and the im pression produced by it was such as to lead the venerable Chief Justice Marshall eighteen years afterward, in writing to Mr. Justice Story, to say, u At the time when this speech was delivered I did not know Mr. Webster, but I was so much struck with it that I did not hesitate then to state that he was a very able man, and would become one of the very first statesmen in America, perhaps the very first." His mind at the very outset of his career had, by a kind of instinct, soared from the principles which govern the mu nicipal relations of individuals to those great rules which dictate the Law of Nations to Independent States. He tells us, in the frag ment of a diary kept while he was a law student in Mr. Gore s office, that he then read Vattel through for the third time. Accord ingly, in after life, there was no subject which he discussed with greater pleasure and, I may add, with greater power, than ques tions of the Law of Nations. The Revolution of Greece had from its outbreak attracted much of the attention of the civilized world. A people, whose ancestors had originally taught letters and arts to mankind, struggling to regain a place in the great family of inde pendent states; the convulsive efforts of a Christian people, the foundation of whose churches by the Apostles in person is ivronk-d in the New Testament, to shake off the yoke of Mohammedan des potism, possessed a strange interest for the friends of Christian Lib- erty throughout Europe and America. Preside*; Monroe had called the attention of Congress to this most interesting struggle in December, 1823 ; and Mr. Webster returning 4o Congress, after a retirement of eight years, as the representative of Boston, made the Greek Revolution the subject of a motion and a speech. In this speech he treated what he called " the great question of the day the question between absolute and regulated governments." He engaged in a searching criticism of the doctrines of the " Holy Alli ance," and maintained the duty of the United States, as a great 1 ive power, to protest against them. That speech remains, in my judg ment, to this day the ablest and most effective remonstrance against the principles of the allied military powers of continental Europe. Mr. Jeremiah Mason pronounced it u the best sample of parliament ary eloquence and statesmanlike reasoning which our country had seen." His indignant protest against the spirit of absolutism, and 190 DANIET, WEBSTER. his words of sympathy with an infant People struggling for inde pendence, were borue on the wings of the wind throughout Chris tendom. They were read in every language, at every court, in every cabinet, in every reading-room, on every market-place, by the Republicans of Mexico and Spanish South America, by the Re formers of Italy, the Patriots of Poland ; on the Tagus, on the Dan ube, as well as at the head of the little armies of revolutionary Greece. The practical impression which it made on the American mind was seen in the liberality with which cargoes of food and clothing, a year or two afterward, were dispatched to the relief of the Greeks. ISTo legislative or executive measure was adopted at that time in consequence of Mr. Webster s motion and speech; probably none was anticipated by him; but no one who considers how much the march of events in such cases is influenced by the moral sentiments, will doubt that a great word like this, spoken in the American Congress, must have had no slight effect in cheering the heart of Greece to persevere in their unequal but finally suc cessful struggle. It was by these masterly parliamentary efforts that Mr. Webster left his mark on the age in which he lived. His fidelity to his con victions kept him for the greater part of his life in a minority ; a position which he regarded, not as a proscription, but as a post of honor and duty. He felt that in free governments and in a normal state of parties, an opposition is a political necessity, and that it has its duties not less responsible than those which attach to office. Before the importance of Mr. Webster s political services is dispar aged for want of positive results, which can only be brought about by those who are clothed with power, it must be shown that to raise a persuasive and convincing voice in the vindication of truth and right, to uphold and assert the true principles of the govern ment under which we live, and bring them home to the hearts of the people to do this from a sense of patriotic duty, and without hope of the honors and emoluments of oih ce, to do it so as to in struct the public conscience and warm the public heart, is a less meritorious service to society than to touch with skillful hand the springs of party politics, and to hold together the often discordant elements of ill-compacted majorities. The greatest parliamentary effort made by Mr. Webster was his second speech on Foot s resolution ; the question at issue being nothing less than this : Is the Constitution of the United States a compact without a common umpire between confederated sov ereignties, or is it a government of the People of the United States, sovereign within the sphere of its delegated powers, but reserving a great mass of undelegated rights to the separate State govern ments and the People. With those who embrace the opinions which Mr. Webster combated in this speech, this is not the time nor the place to engage in an argument ; but those who believe that he maintained the true principles of the Constitution will DANIEL WEHSTER. \f)\ probably agree that since that Instrument was communicated to the Continental Congress, seventy-two years ago this day, by George Washington, as President of the Federal Convention, no greater service baa been rendered to them than in the delivery of this speech. Well do I recollect the occasion and the scene. It was truly what Wellington called the battle of Waterloo, a conflict of Giants. I passed an hour and a half with Mr. Webster, at his request, the evening before this great effort ; and he went over to me, from a very concise brief, the main topics of the speech, which he had prepared for the following day. So calm and unimpas- sioned was the memorandum, so entirely was he at ease himself, that I was tempted to think, absurdly enough, that he was not sufficiently aware of the magnitude of the occasion. But I soon perceived that his calmness was the repose of conscious power. He was not only at ease, but sportive and full of anecdote ; and as he told the Senate playfully the next day, he slept soundly that night on the formidable assault of his gallant and accomplished adversary. So the great Conde slept on the eve of the battle of Rocroi ; so Alexander slept on the eve of the battle of Arbela ; and so they awoke to deeds of immortal fame. As I saw him in the evening (if I may borrow an illustration from his favorite amusement) he was as unconcerned and as free of spirit as some here have often seen him, while floating in his fishing-boat along a hazy shore, gently rocking on the tranquil tide, dropping his line here and there, with the varying fortune of the sport. The next morning he was like some mighty Admiral, dark and terrible, casting the long shadow of his frowning tiers far over the sea, that seemed to sink beneath him ; his broad pennant streaming at the main, the stars and stripes at the fore, the mizzen, and the peak, and bearing down like a tempest upon his antagonist, with all his canvas strained to the wind, and all his thunders roaring from his broadsides. AS A JTJEIST. /Mr. Webster s career was not less brilliant as a jurist than as a statesman. In fact, he possessed in an eminent degree a judicial mind. While performing an amount of congressional and official labor sufficient to fill the busiest day and to task the strongest powers, he yet sustained with a giant s strength the Herculean toils of his profession. At the very commencement of his k jral studies, resisting the fascination of a more liberal course of read ing, he laid his foundations deep in the common law ; grappled as well as he might with the weary subtilties and obsolete technical ities of Coke Littleton, and abstracted and translated volumes of reports from the Norman-French and Latin. A fe\v years of prac tice follow in the Courts of New Hampshire, interrupted by his service in Congress for two political terms, and we find him at the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States at Washington, in- 192 DANIEL WEBSTER. augurating in the Dartmouth College case what may be called a new school of constitutional jurisprudence. It would be a waste of time to speak of that great case, or of Mr. Webster s connection with it. It is too freshly remembered in our tribunals. So novel at that time were the principles involved in it, that a member of the Court, after a cursory inspection of the record of the case, expressed the opinion that little of importance could be urged in behalf of the plaintiff in error ; but so firm is the basis on which in that and subsequent cases of a similar char acter those principles were established, that they form one of the best settled, as they are one of the most important, portions of the constitutional law of the Union. Not less important, and, at the time, not less novel, were the principles involved in the celebrated case of Gibbons and Ogden. This case grew out of a grant by the State of New York to the as signees of Fulton of the exclusive right to navigate by steam the rivers, harbors, and bays of the Empire State. Twenty-five years aftenvard, Mr. Justice Wayne gave to Mr. Webster the credit of having laid down the broad constitutional ground on which the navigable waters of the United States, " every creek and river and lake and bay and harbor in the country," was forever rescued from the grasp of State monopoly. So failed the intention of the Legis lature of New York to secure a rich pecuniary reward to the great perfecter of steam navigation ; so must have failed any attempt to compensate by money the inestimable achievement. Monopolies could not reward it; silver and gold could not weigh down its value. Small services are paid with money ; large ones with fame. Fulton had his reward \vhen, after twenty years of unsuccessful experiment and hope deferred, he made the passage to Albany by steam ; as Franklin had his reward when he saw the fibers of the cord which held his kite stiffening with the electricity they had drawn from the thunder-cloud ; as Galileo had his when he point ed his little tube to the heavens and discovered the Mediceau stars ; as Columbus had his when he beheld from the deck of his vessel a moving light on the shores of his new-found world. That one glowing, unutterable thrill of conscious success is too exquisite to be alloyed with baser metal. The midnight vigils, the aching eyes, the fainting hopes turned at last into one bewildering ecstasy of triumph, can not be repaid with gold. The great discoveries, improvements, and inventions which benefit mankind can only be rewarded by opposition, obloquy, poverty, and an undying name ! Time would fail me, were I otherwise equal to the task, to dwell on the other great constitutional cases argued by Mr. Webster; those on State insolvent laws, the Bank of the United States, the Sailor s Snug Harbor, the Charlestown Bridge Franchise, or those other great cases on the validity of Mr. Girard s will, in which Mr. Webster s argument drew forth an emphatic acknowledgment from the citizens of Washington, of all denominations, for its great DANIEL WEBSTEK. 193 value "in demonstrating the vital importance of Christianity to the success of our free institutions, and that the general diffusion of that argument among the People of the United States is a mat ter of deep public interest ;" or the argument in the Rhode Island charter case in 1848, which attracted no little public notice in Eu rope at that anxious period, as a masterly discussion of the true principles of constitutional obligation. .^-""It would be superfluous, I might almost say impertinent, to re mark, that if Mr. Webster stood at the head of the constitutional lawyers of the country, he was not less distinguished in early and middle life in the ordinary walks of the profession. From a very early period he shared the best practice with the most eminent of his profession. The trial of Goodridge in 1817, and of Ivnapp in 1829, are still recollected as specimens of the highest professional skill, the latter, in fact, as a case of historical importance in the crim inal jurisprudence of the country. But, however distinguished his reputation in the other depart ments of his profession, his fame as a jurist is mainly associated with the tribunals of the United States. The relation of the Fed eral Government to that of the States is peculiar to this country, and gives rise to a class of cases in the Supreme Court of the United States to which there is nothing analagous in the jurispru dence of England. In that country, nothing, not even the express words of a treaty, can be pleaded against an act of Parliament. The Supreme Court of the United States entertains questions which involve the constitutionality of the laws of State Legislatures, the validity of the decrees of State Courts nay, of the constitu tionality of the acts of Congress itself. Every one feels that this range and elevation of jurisdiction must tend greatly to the respecta bility of practice at that forum, and give a breadth and liberality to the tone with which questions are there discussed, not so much to be there looked for in the ordinary litigation of the common law. No one needs to be reminded how fully Mr. Webster felt, and, in his own relations to it, sustained the dignity of this tribunal. He re garded it as the great mediating power of the Constitution. He believed that, while it commanded the confidence of the country, no serious derangement of any of the other great functions of the government was to be apprehended. If it should ever fail to do so, he feared the worst. For the memory of Marshall, the great and honored magistrate, who presided in this court for the third part of a century, and did so much to raise its reputation and establish its influence, he cherished feelings of veneration second only to V those which he bore to the memory of Washington. , AS A DIPLOMATIST. In his political career Mr. Webster owed almost everything to popular choice, or the favor of the Legislature of Massachusetts. He was, however, twice clothed with executive power, as the head 194 DANIEL WEBSTER. of an Administration, and in that capacity achieved a diplomatic, success of the highest order. Among the victories of peace not less renowned than those of war which Milton celebrates, the first place is surely due to those friendly arrangements between great powers, by which war is averted. Such an arrangement was effect ed by Mr. Webster in 1842, in reference to more than one highly ir ritating question between this country and Great Britain, and es pecially the North-Eastern Boundary of the United States. I allude to the subject, not for the sake of reopening obselete contro versies, but for the purpose of vindicating his memory from the charges of disingenuousness, and even fraud, which were brought against him at the time in England, and which have very lately been revived in that country. I do it the rather, as the facts of ^the case have never been fully stated. The North-Eastern Boundary of the United States, which was described by the treaty of 1783, had never been surveyed and run. It was still unsettled in 1842, and had become the subject of a con troversy, which had resisted the ability of several successive administrations, on both sides of the water, and had nearly ex hausted the resources of arbitration and diplomacy. Border col lisions, though happily no bloodshed, had taken place ; seventeen regiments had been thrown into the British provinces ; General Scott had been dispatched to the frontier of Maine ; and our Minister in London (Mr. Stevenson) had written to the commander of the American squadron in the Mediterranean, that a collision, in his opinion, was inevitable. Such was the state of things when Mr. Webster came into the Department of State in the spring of 1841. He immediately gave an intimation to the British Government that he was desirous of renewing the interrupted negotiation. A change of ministry took place in England in the course of a few months, and a resolution was soon taken by Sir Eobert Peel and Lord Aberdeen to send a special Envoy to the United States, to make a last attempt to settle this dangerous dispute by negotiation. Lord Ashburton was selected for this honorable errand, and his known friendly relations with Mr. Webster were among the motives that prompted his appoint ment. It may be observed, that the intrinsic difficulties of the ne gotiation were increased by the circumstance, that, as the disputed territory lay in the State of Maine, and the property of the soil was in Maine and Massachusetts, it was deemed necessary to obtain the consent of those States to any arrangement that might be en tered into by the General Government. The length of time for which the question had been controverted had, as usually happens in such cases, the effect of fixing both parties more firmly in their opposite views of the subject. It was a pledge, at least, of the good faith with which the United States had conducted the discussion, that everything in our archives bear ing on the subject had been voluntarily spread before the world. DANIEL WEBSTEK. 195 On the other side, no part of the correspondence of the ministers who negotiated the treaty had ever been published, and whenever Americans were permitted, for literary purposes, to institute his torical inquiries in the public offices in London, precautions were taken to prevent anything from being brought to light which might bear unfavorably on the British interpretation of the treaty. The American interpretation of the treaty had been maintained in its fullest extent, as far as I am aware, by every statesman in the country, of whatever party, to whom the question had ever been submitted. It had been thus maintained in good faith by an entire generation of public men of the highest intelligence and most unquestioned probity. The British government had, with equal confidence, maintained their interpretation. The attempt to settle the controversy by a reference to the King of the Netherlands had failed. In this state of things, as the boundary had remained un settled for tifty-nine years, and had been controverted for more than twenty ; as negotiation and arbitration had shown that neither party was likely to convince tho other ; and as, in cases of this kind, it is more important that a public controversy should be settled than how it should be settled (of course within reasonable limits), Mr. Webster had from the first contemplated a conventional line. Such a line, and for the same reasons, was anticipated in Lord Ash- burton s instructions, and was accordingly agreed upon by the two negotiators a line convenient and advantageous to both parties. Such an adjustment, however, like that which had been proposed by the King of the Netherlands, was extremely distasteful to the people of Maine, who, standing on their rights, adhered with the greatest tenacity to the boundary described by the treaty of 1783, as the United States had always claimed it. As the opposition of Maine had prevented that arrangement from taking effect, there is great reason to suppose that it would have prevented the adoption of the conventional line agreed to by Mr. Webster and Lord Ash- burton, but for the following circumstance. This was the discovery, the year before, by President Sparks, in the archives of the Bureau of Foreign Affairs, at Paris, of a copy of a small map of North America, by D Auville, published in 1746, on which a red line was drawn, indicating a boundary between the United States and Great Britain more favorable to the latter than she had herself claimed it. By whom it was marked, or for what purpose, did not appear, from any indication on the map itself. There was also found, in the Bureau of Foreign Affairs, in a hound volume of official correspondence, a letter from Dr. Franklin to the Count de Vergennes, dated on the Oth of December (six days alter the signature of the provisional articles), stating that, in compliance with the Count s request, and on 4 map sent him for the purpose, he had marked, "with a strong red line, the limits of the United States, as settled in the preliminaries." The French archives had been searched by Mr. Canning s agents 196 DANIEL WEBSTEK. as long ago as 1827, but this map either escaped their notice, or had not been deemed by them of importance. The English and French maps of this region differ from each other, and it is known that the map used by the negotiators of the treaty of 1783 was Mitchell s large map of America, published under the official sanc tion of the Board of Trade in 1754. D Anville s map was but eighteen inches square, and on so small a scale the difference of the two boundaries would be but slight, and consequently open to mis take. The letter of the Count de Vergennes, transmitting a map to be marked, is not preserved, nor is there any indorsement on the red-line map to show that it is the map sent by the Count and marked by Franklin. D AnvihVs map was published in 1746, and it would surely be unwarrantable to take for granted, in a case of such importance, that, in the course of thirty years, it could not have been marked with a red line for some other purpose, and by some other person. It would be equally rash to assume as certain either that the map marked by Franklin for the Count de Vergen nes was deposited by him in the public archives; or, if so depos ited, may not still be hid a\vay among the sixty thousand maps contained in that depository. The official correspondence of Mr. Oswald, the British negotiator, was retained by the British minister in his own possession, and does not appear to have gone into the public archives. In the absence of all evidence to connect Dr. Franklin s letter with the map, it could not, in a court of justice, have been received for a moment as a map marked by him ; and any presumption that it was so marked, was resisted by the language of the treaty. This point was urged in debate, with great force, by Lord Brougham, who, as well as Sir Robert Peel, liberally defended Mr. Webster from the charges which the opposition journals in London had brought against him. Information of this map was, in the progress of the negotiation, very properly communicated to Mr. Webster by Mr. Sparks. For the reasons stated, it could not be admitted as proving anything. It was another piece of evidence of uncertain character, and Mr. Webster could have no assurance that the next day might not pro duce some other map equally strong or stronger on the American side ; which, as I shall presently state, was soon done in London. In this state of things, he made the only use of it which could be legitimately made, in communicating it to the commissioners of the State of Maine and Massachusetts and to the Senate, as a piece of conflicting evidence, entitled to consideration, likely to be urged as of great importance by the opposite party, if the discussion should be renewed, increasing the difficulties which already sur rounded the question, and thus furnishing new grounds for agree ing to the proposed conventional line. No one, I think, acquainted with the history of the controversy, and the state of public opinion and feeling, can doubt that, but for this communication, it would DANIEL WEBSTER. 197 have been difficult, if not impossible, to procure the assent either of Maine or of the Senate to the treaty. This would seem to be going as far as reason or honor required, in reference to an unauthentioated document, having none of the properties of legal evidence, not exhibited by the opposite party, and of a nature to be outweighed by contradictory evidence of the same kind, which was very soon done. But Mr. Webster was, at the time, severely censured by the opposition press in England, and was accused of "perfidy and want of good faith" (and this charge has lately been revived in an elaborate and circumstantial manner), for not going with this map to Lord Ashburton ; entirely abandoning the American claim, and ceding the whole of the dis puted territory, more even than she asked, to Great Britain, on the strength of this single piece of doubtful evidence. Such a charge scarcely deserves an answer ; but two things will occur to all impartial persons : one, that the red-line map, even had it been proved to have been marked by Franklin (which it is not), would be but one piece of evidence to be weighed with the words of the treaty, with all the other evidence in the case, and especially with the other maps ; and, secondly, that such a course as it is pre tended that Mr. Webster ought to have pursued, could only be reasonably required of him, on condition that the British govern ment had also produced, or would undertake to produce, all the evidence, and especially all the maps in its possession, favorable to the American claim. Now, not to urge against the red-line map, that, as was vigor ously argued by Lord Brougham, it was at variance with the ex press words "of the treaty, there were, according to Mr. Gallatin, the commissioner for preparing the claim of the United States, to be submitted to the arbiter in 1827, at least twelve maps published in London in the course of two years after the signature of the pro visional articles in 1782, all of which give the boundary line pre cisely as claimed by the United States ; and no map was published in London, favoring the British claim, till the third year. The earliest of these maps were prepared to illustrate the debates in Parliament on the treaty, or to illustrate the treaty in anticipation of the debate. None of the speakers on either side intimated that these maps are inaccurate, though some of the opposition speakers attacked the treaty as giving a disadvantageous boundary. One of these maps, that of Faden, the royal geographer, was stated on the face of it to be u drawn according to the treaty." Mr. Sparks is of opinion that Mr. Oswald, the British envoy by whom the treaty was negotiated, and who was in London when the earliest of the maps were engraved, was consulted by the map-makers on the subject of the boundary. At any rate, had they been inaccu rate in this respect, either Mr. Oswald or the minister, u who was vehemently assailed on account of the large concession of the boundaries," would have exposed the error. But neither by Mr. 198 DANIEL WEBSTER. Oswald nor by any of the ministers was any complaint made of the inaccuracy of the maps. One of these maps was that contained in "Bew s Political Mag azine," a respectable journal, for which it was prepared, to illus trate the debate on the provisional articles of 1782. It happened that Lord Ashburton was calling- upon me, about the time of the debate in the House of Commons on the merits of the Treaty, on the 21st March, 1843. On my expressing to him the opinion, with the freedom warranted by our intimate friendly relations, that his government ought to be much obliged to him for obtaining so much of a territory, of which I conscientiously believed the whole be longed to us, " What," asked he, " have you to oppose to the red- line map?" I replied that, in addition to the other objections already mentioned, I considered it to be outweighed by the numer ous other maps which were published at London at the time, some of them to illustrate the treaty ; and, among them, I added, " the map in the volume which happens to lie on my table at this mo ment," which was the volume of "Bew s Political Magazine," to which I called his attention. He told me that he was unac quainted with that map, and desired that I would lend him the vol ume to show to Sir Robert Peel. This I did, and in his reply to Lord Palmerston, in the House of Commons, Sir Robert Peel, hold ing this volume of mine in his hand, referred to the map contain ed in it, and "which follows," said he, "exactly the American line," as an off-set to the red-line map, of which great use bad been made by the opposition in England, for the purpose of showing that Lord Ashburton had been overreached by Mr. Webster. In the course of his speech he defended Mr. Webster in the handsom est manner from the charges brought against him in reference to this map by the opposition press, and said that in his judgment * the reflections cast upon that most worthy and honorable man are unjust." ISTor was this all. The more effectually to remove the impression attempted to be raised, in consequence of the red-line map, that Lord Ashburton had been overreached, Sir Robert Peel stated and the disclosure was now for the first time made that there was in the library of King George the Third (which had been given to the British Museum by George the Fourth) a copy of Mitchell s map, in which the boundary as delineated " follows exactly the line claimed by the United States." On four places upon this line are written the words, in a strong, bold hand, * The boundary as described by Mr. Oswald." There is documentary proof that Mr. Oswald sent the map used by him, in negotiating the treaty, to King George the Third, for his information; and Lord Brougham stated in his place, in the House of Peers, that the words, four times repeated, in different parts of the line, were, in his opinion, written by the King himself! Having listened, and of course with the deepest in terest to the debate in the House of Commons, I sought the earli- DANIEL WEBSTER. lf)() est opportunity of inspecting the map, which was readily granted to me by Lord Aberdeen. The boundary is marked, in the most distinct and skillful manner, from the St. Croix all round to the St. Marv s, ami is precisely thai which lias been always claimed by us. Then- is every reason to believe that this is the identical copy of Mitchell s map otlicially used by the negotiators and sent by Mr. ()>\\ald. as we learn from Dr. Franklin, to England. Sir Kobert Peel informed me that it was unknown to him till after the treaty, and Lord Aberdeen and Lord Ashhurton gave me the same assur ance. It was well known, however, to the agent employed under Lord Melbourne s administration in maintaining the British claim, and who was foremost in vilifying Mr. Webster for concealing the red-line map!* AB A PUBLIC SPEAKEE. had intended to say a few words on Mr. "Webster s transcend- ability as a public speaker on the great national anniversaries, and the patriotic celebrations of the country. But it would be impossible, within the limits of a few paragraphs, to do any kind of justice to such efforts as the discourse on the twenty-second December, at Plymouth ; the speeches on laying the corner-stone and the completion of the Bunker Hill Monument ; the eulogy on Adams and Jefferson ; the character of Washington ; the dis course on laying the foundation of the extension of the Capitol. "What gravity and significance in the topics, what richness of illus tration, what soundness of principle, what elevation of sentiment, what fervor in the patriotic appeals, what purity, vigor, and clear ness in the style ! With reference to the first-named of these admirable discourses, the elder President Adams declared that " Burke is no longer enti tled to the praise the most consummate orator of modern times;" and it will, I think, be admitted by any one who shall attentively study them, that if Mr. Webster, with all his powers and all his at tainments, had done nothing else but enrich the literature of the country with these performances, he would be allowed to have lived not unworthily, nor in vain. When we consider that they were produced under the severe pressure of professional and offi cial engagements, numerous and arduous enough to task even his intellect, we are lost in admiration of the affluence of his mental resources. * Sir Eobert Peel, with reference to the line on Oswald s map, observes, "I do not say that that was the boundary, ultimately settled by the negotiators." Such, however, is certainly the case. Mr. Jay s copy of Mitchell s map (which was also discovered after the negotiation of the treaty) exhibits a line running down the St. John s to its mouth, and called Mr. Oswald s line." This is the line which Mr. Os wald offered to the American negotiators on the *th of October. It was, however, not approved by the British government, and t!>e line indicated in the map of King George the Third, as the u Boundary as described by Mr. Oswald," was finally agreed to. 200 DANIEL WEBSTER. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STYLE AND MANATEE. In all the speeches, arguments, discourses, and compositions of every kind proceeding from Mr. Webster s lips or pen, there were certain general characteristics which I am unwilling to dismiss without a passing allusion. Each, of course, had its peculiar merits, according to the nature and importance of the subject, and the degree of pains bestowed by Mr. Webster on the dis cussion ; but I find some general qualities pervading them all. One of them is the extreme sobriety of the tone, the pervading common sense, the entire absence of that extravagance and over statement which are so apt to creep into political harangues and the discourses on patriotic anniversaries. His positions were taken strongly, clearly, and boldly, but without wordy amplification or one sided vehemence. You feel that your understanding is addressed, on behalf of a reasonable proposition, which rests neither on senti mental refinement or rhetorical exaggeration. This is the case even in speeches like that on the Greek Revolution, where, in en listing the aid of classical memories and Christian sympathies, it was so difficult to rest within the bounds of moderation. This moderation not only characterizes Mr. Webster s parlia mentary efforts, but is equally conspicuous in his discourses on popular and patriotic occasions, which, amid all the inducements to barren declamation, are equally and always marked by the treat ment of really important topics in a manly and instructive strain of argument and reflection, Let it not be thought, however, that I would represent Mr. Webster s speeches in Congress or elsewhere as destitute on proper occasions of the most glowing appeals to the moral sentiments, or wanting, when the topic invites it, in any of the adornments of a magnificent rhetoric. Who that heard it, or has read it, will ever forget the desolating energy of his denunciation of the African Slave Trade, in the discourse at Plymouth ; or the splendor of the apostrophe to Warren, in the first discourse on Bunker Hill ; or that to the monumental shaft and the survivors of the Revolution in the second ; or the trumpet-tones of the speech placed in the lips of John Adams, in the eulogy on Adams and Jefferson ; or the sublime peroration of the speech on Foot s resolution ; or the lyric fire of the imagery by which he illustrates the extent of the Brit ish empire ; or the almost supernatural terror of his description of the force of conscience in the argument in Knapp s trial. Then, how bright and fresh the description of Niagara ! how beautiful the picture of the Morning in his private correspondence, which, as well as his familiar conversation, was enlivened by the per petual play of a joyous and fertile imagination! In a word, what tone in all the grand and melting music of our language is there which is not heard in some portion of his speeches or writings ; while reason, sense, and truth compose the basis of the strain ? DANIEL WEBSTER. 201 Like the sky above us, it is sometimes serene and cloudless, and peace and love shine out from its starry depths. At other times the gallant streamers, in wild, fantastic play emerald, and rose, and orange, and lleecy white shoot upward from the horizon, mingle in a fiery canopy at the zenith, and throw out their flick ering curtains over the heavens and the earth ; while at other times the mustering tempest piles his lowering battlements on the sides of the north; a furious storm- wind rushes forth from their blazing loop-holes, and volleyed thunders give the signal of the ele mental war ! Another quality, which appears to me to be very conspicuous in all Mr. Webster s .speeches, is the fairness and candor with which he treats the argument of his, opponent, and the total absence of olieiiMve personality. lie was accustomed, in preparing to argue a question at the bar, or to debate it in the Senate, first to state his opponent s case, or argument, in his own mind, with as much force and skill as if it were his own view of the subject, not deeming it worthy of a statesman discussing the great issues of the public weal, to assail and prostrate a man of straw, and call it a victory over his antagonist. True to his party associations, there w T as the least possible mingling of the partizan in his parliamentary efforts. No one, I think, ever truly said of him that he had either misrep resented or failed to grapple fairly with the argument which he un dertook to confute. That he possessed the power of invective in the highest degree is well known, from the display of it on a few occasions, when great provocation justified and required it ; but he habitually abstained from offensive personality, regarding it as an indication always of a bad temper, and generally of a weak cause. I notice, lastly, a sort of judicial dignity in Mr. Webster s mode of treating public questions, which may be ascribed to the high de gree in which he united, in the range of his studies and the habits of his life, the jurist with the statesman. There were occasions, and these not. a few, when but for the locality from which he spoke, you might have been at a loss whether you were listening to the accomplished senator unfolding the principles of the Con stitution as a system of Government, or the consummate jurist ap plying its legislative provisions to the practical interests of life. In the Dartmouth College case, and that of Gibbons and Ogden, the dryness of a professional argument is forgotten in the breadth and elevation of the constitutional principles shown to be involved in the issue ; while in the great speeches on the interpretation of the Constitution, a severe judicial logic darts its sunbeams into the deepest recesses of a written compact of Government, intended to work out a harmonious adjustment of the antagonistic principles of Federal and State sovereignty. None, I think, but a great statesman could have performed Mr. Webster s part before the highest tribunals of the land ; none but a great lawyer could have 202 DANIEL WEBSTEB. sustained himself as he did on the floor of the Senate. In fact, he rose to that elevation at which the law, in its highest conception, and in its versatile functions and agencies, as the great mediator be tween the State and the individual ; the shield b j which the weakness of the single man is protected from the violence and craft of his fel lows, and clothed for the defense of his rights with the mighty power of the mass ; which watches faithful guardian over the life and property of the orphan in the cradle ; spreads the aegis of the pub lic peace alike over the crowded streets of great cities and the sol itary pathways of the wilderness ; which convoys the merchant and his cargo in safety to and from the ends of the earth ; pre scribes the gentle humanities of civilization to contending armies ; sits serene umpire of the clashing interests of confederated States, and molds them all into one grand union ; I say, M^ Webster rose to an elevation at \vhich all these attributes and functions of universal law in action alternately executive, legislative, and ju dicial ; in form, successively constitution, statute, and decree are mingled into one harmonious, protecting, strengthening, vitalizing, sublime system ; brightest image on earth of that ineifable sove reign energy, which, with mingled power, wisdom, and love, up holds and governs the universe. THE CENTRAL IDEA OF HIS POLITICAL SYSTEM. Led equally by his professional occupations and his political du ties to make the Constitution the object of his profoundest study and meditation, he regarded it with peculiar reverence, as a Cove nant of Union between the members of this great and increasing family of States ; and in that respect he considered it as the most im portant document ever penned by the hand of uninspired man. I need not tell you that this reverence for the Constitution as the covenant of union between the States was the central idea of his political system, which, however, in this, as in all other respects, aimed at a wise and safe balance of extreme opinions. He valued, as much as any man can possibly value it, the principle of State sovereignty. He looked upon the organization of these separate independent republics of different sizes, different ages and histo ries, different geographical positions and local interests as furnish ing a security of inappreciable value for a wise and beneficent administration of local affairs, and the protection of individual and local rights. But he regarded as an approach to the perfection of political wisdom, the molding of these separate and independent sovereignties, with all their pride of individual right, and all their jealousy of individual consequence, into a harmonious whole. He never weighed the two principles against each other; he held them complemental to each other, equally and supremely vital and essential. I happened, one bright starry night, to be walking home with him, at a late hour, from the Capitol at Washington, after a skir- DANIEL WEBSTER. 203 mishing debate, in "which lie had been speaking, at no great length, but. with much earnestness and warmth, on the subject of thet on- stitution as forming a united government. The planet Jupiter, shininir with unusual brilliancy, was in full view. He paused as we descended Capitol Kill, and unconsciously pursuing the train of thought which he had been enforcing in the Senate, pointed to the planet and said " Night unto night showeth knowledge: take away the independent force, emanating from the hand of the Su- Ereme, which impels that planet onward, and it would plunge in ideous ruin from those, beautiful skies unto the sun ; takeaway the central attraction of the sun, and the attendant planet would shoot madly from its sphere ; urged and restrained by the balanced forces, it wheels its eternal circles through the heavens." HE CONTEMPLATES A WOKK ON THE CONSTITUTION. His reverence for the Constitution led him to meditate a work in which the history of its formation and adoption should he traced, its principles unfolded and explained, its analogies with other govern ments investigated, its expansive fitness to promote the prosperity of the country for ages yet to come, developed and maintained. His thoughts had long flowed in this channel. The subject was not only the one on which he had bestowed his most earnest par liamentary efforts, but it formed the point of reference of much of his historical and miscellaneous reading. He was .anxious to learn what the experience of mankind taught on the subject of governments in any degree resembling our own. As our fathers, in forming the Confederation, and still more the members of the Convention which framed the Constitution and especially Wash ington studied with diligence the organization of all the former compacts of government those of the Netherlands, of Switzer land, and ancient Greece, so Mr. Webster directed special atten tion to all the former leagues and confederacies of modern and ancient times, for lessons and analogies of encouragement and warning to his countrymen. He dwelt much on the Amphicty- onic league of Greece, one of the confederacies to which the framers of the Constitution often referred, and which is frequently spoken of as a species of federal government. Unhappily for Greece, it had little claim to that character. Founded originally on confraternity of religious rites, it was expanded in the lapse of time into a loose political association, but was destitute of all the powers of an organized, efficient government. On this subject Mr. Webster found a remark in Grote s History of Greece, which struck him as being of extreme significance to the people of the United States. Occasionally," says Grote, " there was a partial pretense for the imposing title bestowed upon the Amphictyonic league by Cicero, Commune Gra?cia3 Concilium, but we should completely misinterpret Grecian History, if we regarded it as a federal council habitually directing, or habitually obeyed." " And 204 DANIEL WEBSTEE. now," said Mr. Webster, " comes a passage which ought to be writ ten in letters of gold over the door of the Capitol and of every State Legislature : Had there existed any such " Commune Concilium" of tolerable wisdom and patriotism, and had the tendencies of the Hellenic mind been capable of adapting themselves to it, the whole course of later Grecian History would probably have been altered ; the Macedonian kings would have remained only as respectable neighbors, borrowing their civilization from Greece, and exercising their military energies upon Thracians and Illyrians ; while united Hellas might have maintained her own territory against the con quering legions of Rome. " * A wise and patriotic federal gov ernment would have preserved Greece from the Macedonian phalanx and the Roman legions! Professional and official labors engrossed Mr. Webster s time and left him no leisure for the execution of his meditated work on the Constitution a theme which, as he would have treated it, tracing it back to its historical fountains and forward to its pro phetic issues, seems to me, in the wide range of its topics, to embrace higher and richer elements of thought, for the American statesman and patriot, than any other not directly connected with the spiritual welfare of man. MAGNITUDE OF THE THEME. THE FUTUKE OF THE UNION. What else is there, in the material system of the world, so won derful as the concealment of the Western Hemisphere for ages behind the mighty vail of waters ? How could such a secret be kept from the foundation of the world till the end of the fifteenth century? What so astonishing as the concurrence, within less than a century, of the invention of printing, the demonstration of the true system of the Heavens, and this great-world discovery? What so mysterious as the dissociation of the native tribes of this continent from the civilized and civilizable races of man ? What so remarkable, in political history, as the operation of the in fluences now in conflict, now in harmony under which the various nations of the Old World sent their children to occupy the New ; great populations silently stealing into existence ; the wilderness of one century swarming in the next with millions; ascending the streams, crossing the mountains, struggling with a wild, hard nature, with savage foes, with rival settlements of for eign powers, but ever onward, onward ? What so propitious as this long colonial training in the school of chartered govern ment ; and then, when the fullness of time had come, what so majestic, amid all its vicissitudes and all its trials, as the Grand Separation mutually beneficial in its final result to both parties the dread appeal to arms, that venerable Continental Congress, the august Declaration, the strange alliance of the oldest monarchy * Grote a History of Greece, Yol. ii. p. 886. DANIEL WEBSTER. 205 of Europe with the Infant Republic? And, lastly, what so worthy the admiration of men and angels as the appearance of him the expected ; him the Hero, raised up to conduct the mo mentous contliot to its auspicious issue in the Confederation, the Union, the Constitution ! Is this a theme not unworthy of the pen and the mind of Web ster? Then consider the growth of the country, thus politically inhered into existence and organized under that Constitution, as delineated in his address on laying the corner-stone of the ex tension of the Capitol; the thirteen colonies that accomplished the Revolution multiplied to thirty-two independent States, a single one of them exceeding in population the old thirteen; the narrow border of settlement along the coast, fenced in by France and the native tribes, expanded to the dimensions of the continent; Louisiana, Florida, Texas, New Mexico, California, Oregon ter ritories equal to the great monarchies of Europe added to the Union ; and the two millions of population which fired the imagin ation of Burke, swelled to twenty-four millions during the lifetime of Mr. Webster, and in seven short years, which have since elapsed, increased to thirty ! With these stupendous results in his own time as the unit of calculation beholding under Providence with each Decade of years, a new people, millions strong, emigrants in part from the Old World, but mainly bone of our bone, and flesh of our liesh, the children of the soil, growing up to inhabit the waste places of the continent, to inherit and transmit the rights and blessings which we have received from our fathers ; recognizing in the Constitution and in the Union established by it the creative in fluence which, as far as human agencies go, has wrought these miracles of growth and progress, and which wraps up in sacred reserve the expansive energy with which the work is to be carried on and perfected, he looked forward with patriotic aspiration to the time when, beneath its aegis, the whole wealth of our civil ization would be poured out, not only to fill up the broad inter stices of settlement, if I may so express myself, in the old thirteen, and their young and thriving sister States already organized in the West, but in the lapse of time, to found a hundred ne\v repub lics in the valley of the Missouri and beyond the Rocky Mountains, till our letters and our arts, our schools and our churches, our laws and our liberties, shall be carried from the arctic circle to the tropics ; " from the rising of the sun to the going down thereof." VIEWS OF THE PRE9EXT. This prophetic glance, not merely at the impending, but the dis tant future, this reliance on the fulfillment of the great design of Providence, illustrated through our whole history, to lavish upon the people of this country the accumulated blessings of all former stages of human progress, made him more tolerant of the tardy 206 DANIEL WEBSTER, and irregular advances and temporary wanderings from the path of what he deemed a wise and sound policy than those fervid spirits who dwell exclusively in the present, and make less allowance for the gradual operation of moral influences. This was the case in reference to the great sectional controversy which now so sharply divides and so violently agitates the country. He not only confi dently anticipated what the lapse of seven years since his decease has witnessed and is witnessing, that the newly-acquired and the newly-organized territories of the Union would grow up into free States ; but, in common with all or nearly ah 1 the statesmen of the last generation, he believed that free labor would ultimately pre vail throughout the country. He thought he saw that in the operation of the same causes which have produced this result in the Middle and Eastern States, it was visibly taking place in the States north of the cotton-growing region ; and he inclined to the opinion that there also, under the influence of physical and eco nomical causes, free labor would eventually be found most produc tive, and would therefore be ultimately established. For these reasons, bearing in mind, what all admit, that the com plete solution of the mighty problem, which now so greatly tasks the prudence and patriotism of the wisest and best in the land, is beyond the delegated powers of the General Government ; that it depends, as far as the States are concerned, on their independent legislation, and that it is, of all others, a subject in reference to which public opinion and public sentiment will most powerfully influence the law ; that much in the lapse of time, without law, is likely to be brought about by degrees, and gradually done and per mitted, as in Missouri, at the present day ; while nothing is to be hoped from external interference, whether of exhortation or re buke that in all human affairs controlled by self-governing com munities, extreme opinions and extreme courses, on the one hand, generally lead to extreme opinions and extreme courses on the other ; and that nothing will more contribute to the earliest prac ticable relief of the country from this most prolific source of con flict and estrangement, than to prevent its being introduced into our party organizations, he deprecated its being allowed to find a place among the political issues of the day, North or South ; and seeking a platform on which honest and patriotic men might meet and stand, he thought he had found it, where our fathers did, in the Constitution. It is true that, in interpreting the fundamental law on this sub ject, a diversity of opinion between the two sections of the Union presents itself. This has ever been the case, first or last, in rela tion to every great question which has divided the country. It is the unfailing incident of constitutions, written or unwritten ; an evil to be dealt with in good faith, by prudent and enlightened men, in both sections of the Union, seeking, as Washington sought, DANIEL WEBSTER. 207 the public good, and giving expression to the patriotic common- sense of the people. Such, I have reason to believe, were the principles entertained by Mr. Webster ; not certainly those best calculated to win a tem porary popularity in any part of the Union, in times of passionate sectional agitation, which, between the extremes of opinion, leaves no middle ground for moderate counsels. If any one could have found and could have trodden such ground with success, he would seem to have been qualified to do it, by his transcendent talent, his mature experience, his approved temper and calmness, and his tried patriotism. If he failed of finding such a path for himself or the country while we thoughtfully await what time and an all- i rovidence has in store for ourselves and our children let ns remember that his attempt was the highest and the purest which can engage the thoughts of a Statesman and a Patriot : Peace on earth, good-will toward men ; harmony and brotherly love among the children of our common country. And O, my friends, if among those who, differing from him on this or any other subject, have yet, with generous forgetfulness of that which separated you, and kindly remembrance of all that you held in common, come up this day to do honor to his memory, there are any who suppose that he cherished less tenderly than yourselves the great ideas of Liberty, Humanity, and Brotherhood ; that, because he was faithful to the duties which he inferred from the Constitution and the Law, to which he looked for the govern ment of Civil Society, he was less sensible than yourselves to the broader relations and deeper sympathies which unite us to our fellow-creatures, as brethren of one family and children of one heavenly Father, believe me, you do his memory a grievous wrong. PERSONAL CHARACTER. This is not the occasion to dwell upon the personal character of Mr. Webster, on the fascination of his social intercourse, or the charm of his domestic life. Something I could have said on his Companionable disposition and habits, his genial temper, the re sources and attractions of his conversation, his love of nature, alike in her wild and cultivated aspects, and his keen perception of the beauties of this fair world in which we live ; something of his devotion to agricultural pursuits, which, next to his profes sional and public duties, formed the occupation of his life ; some thing of his fondness for athletic and manly sports and exercise-; something of his friendships, and of his attachments warmer than friendships the son, the brother, the husband, and the father; something of the joys and the sorrows of his home ; of the strength of his religious convictions, his testimony to the truth of the Christian Revelation; the tenderness and sublimity of the parting scene. Something on these topics I have elsewhere said, and may not here repeat. 208 DANIEL WEBSTEE. Some other things, my friends, with your indulgence, I would say; thoughts, memories, which crowd upon, me, too vivid to be repressed, too personal almost to be uttered. On the 17th of July, 1804, a young man from New Hampshire arrived in Boston, all but penniless, and all but friendless. He was twenty -two years of age, and had come to take the first steps in the career of life at the capital of New England. Three days after arriving in Boston he presented himself, without letters of recommendation, to Mr. Christopher Gore, then just returned from England, after an official residence of some years, and solicited a place in his office as a clerk. His only introduction was by a young man as little known to Mr. Gore as himself, and who went to pro nounce his name, which he did so indistinctly as not to be heard. His slender figure, striking countenance, large dark eye, and massy brow, his general appearance indicating a delicate organization,* his manly carriage and modest demeanor, arrested attention and inspired confidence. His humble suit was granted, he was received into the office, and had been there a week before Mr. Gore learned that his name was DANIEL WEBSTER! His older brother older in years, but later in entering life (for whose education Daniel, while teacher of the" Academy at Fryeburg, had drudged till mid night in the office of the Register of Deeds), at that time taught a small school in Short Street (now Kingston Street), in Boston, and while he was in attendance at the commencement at Dartmouth, in 1804, to receive his degree, Daniel supplied hi s place. At that school, at the age often, I was then a pupil, and there commenced a friendship which lasted, without interruption or chill, while his life lasted ; of which, while mine lasts, the grateful recollection will never perish. From that time forward I knew, I honored, I loved him. I saw him at all seasons and on all occasions, in the flush of public triumph, in the intimacy of the fireside, in the most unre served interchange of personal confidence ; in health and in sick ness, in sorrow and in joy ; when early honors began to wreath his brow, and in after life through most of the important scenes of his public career. I saw him on occasions th-at show the manly strength, and, what is better, the manly weakness of the human heart ; and I declare this day, in the presence of Heaven and of men, that I never heard from him the expression of a wish unbe coming a good citizen and a patriot the utterance of word unwor thy a gentleman and a Christian ; that I never knew a more gen erous spirit, a safer adviser, a warmer friend. Do you ask me if he had faults? I answer, he was a man. He had some of the faults of a lofty spirit, a genial temperament, and a warm and generous nature ; he had none of the faults of a grov eling, mean, and malignant nature. He had especially the "last * Description by Mrs. Eliza Buckminstcr Leo, Webster s Private Correspond ence, i., 438. DANIEL WEBSTER. 209 infirmity of noble mind, and hud no doubt raised an aspiring eye to the highest object of political ambition. But he did it in the honest pride of a capacity i/qual to the station, and with a con- sciousness that he should reflect back the honor which it conferred. He might sny, with Burke, that "he had no arts but honest arts; and if he sought the highest honors of the state, he did it by trans cendent talent, laborious service, and patriotic devotion to the public good. It was not given to him, any more than to the other members of the great triumvirate with whom his name is habitually associ ated, to attain the object of their ambition ; but posterity will do them justice, and begins already to discharge the debt of respect and gratitude. A noble mausoleum in honor of Clay, and his statue by Hart, are in progress ; the statue of Calhoun, by Powers, adorns the Court House in Charleston, and a magnificent monument to his memory is in preparation ; and we present you this day, fellow- citizens, the Statue of Webster, in enduring bronze, on a pedestal of granite from his native State, the noble countenance modeled from life, at the meridian of his days and his fame, and his person reproduced, from faithful recollection, by the oldest and most dis tinguished of the living artists of the country. He sleeps by the multitudinous ocean, which he himself so much resembled in its mighty movement and its mighty repose ; but his monumental form shall henceforward. stand sentry at the portals of the Capitol; the right hand pointing to that symbol of the Union on which the left reposes, and his imperial gaze directed, with the Hopes of the coun try, to the boundless West. In a few short years, we, whose eyes have rested on his majestic person, whose ears have drunk in the music of his clarion voice, shall have gone to our rest; but our children, for ages to come, as they dwell with awe-struck gaze upon the monumental bronze, shall say, Oh that we could have seen, oh that we could have heard, the great original! Two hundred and twenty-nine years ago, this day, our beloved city received, from the General Court of the Colony, the honored name of Boston. On the long roll of those whom she has welcom ed to her nurturing bosom is there a name which shines with a brighter luster than his ? Seventy-two years ago, this day, the Constitution of the United States was tendered to the acceptance of the people by George Washington. Who, of all the gifted and patriotic of the land, that have adorned the interval, has done more to unfold its principles, assert its purity, and to promote its duration ? Here, then, under the cope of Heaven ; here, on this lovely em inence ; here, beneath the walls of the Capitol of old Massachusetts, here, within the sight of those fair New England villages ; here, in the near vicinity of the graves of those who planted the germs of all this palmy growth ; here, within the sound of sacred bells, we raise this monument, with loving hearts, to the Statesman, the 210 DANIEL WEBSTER. Patriot, the Fellow-Citizen, the Neighbor, the Friend. Long may it guard the approach to these halls of council ; long may it look out upon a prosperous country ; and, if days of trial and disaster should come, and the arm of flesh should fail, doubt not that the monumental form would descend from its pedestal, to stand in the front rank of the peril, and the bronze lips repeat the cry of the living voice " Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and in separable!" HENRY WARD BEECHER S ?. SERMONS -;.; PUBLISHED Vv/EEKl_Y IN Tlie Ind.epeiid.eiit In addition to the interesting matter contained in every successive number of The Independent, the Publisher IB h:i|>py to announce that the Sunday Morninir Sermons of UK V. I1KNKY WARD BKKt II KU will appear exclusively in IW columns evi-ry week. They are the only reports given to the press which receive revision from the Author s own hand. ^ r Among other Special contributors are the following well-known writers: Jflrs. II4IIIIIET BEECIIER STOWE, llcv. GEO. B. CHE EVER, and JOIIJT G. WUITTIER. Terms : *p S.OO a yetir, paya,"ble in. advance. Address, JOSEPH H. RICHARDS, PUBLISHER, No. 5 Beekman Street, N. Y. FOE SALE BY ALL NEWS AGENTS. SAXTOIV, BARKER & CO., 25 Park Row, New-York, PUBLISH The Horticulturist and Journal of Rural Art: EDITED BY J. JAY SMITH ESTABLISHED BY A. J. DOWNING IN 1846. It embraces within its scope, The Description and Cultivation of Fruit and Fruit Trees, Flowers, Flowering Plants and Shrubs, and all Edible Plants which are, or should be, grown in our Gardens. Gardening as an Art of Taste Rural Architecture, etc., etc. Published Monthly, at $2.00 per year. An edition with Colored Plates, at $5.00 per year. SAXTON, BARKER & Co. also keep constantly on hand, a complete assort ment of Works on Agriculture, Horticulture, Rural Art, and Domestic Economy. Catalogues sent upon application. Books mailed, postage paid, to any address, upon receipt of price. FOWLER & WELLS, 308 Broadway, New York, publish the following Popular and Scientific Journals, which afford an excellent opportunity for bringing before the public all subjepts of general interest. LIFE ILLUSTRATED: A FIRST-CLASS PICTORIAL WEEKLY NEWSPAPER, devoted to News, Literature, Science, and the Arts; to Entertainment, Improvement, and Progress. Designed to encourage a spirit of Hope, Manliness, Self-Re liance, and Activity among the people ; to point out the means of profit able economy ; and to discuss and illustrate the leading ideas of the day ; to record all signs of progress ; and to advocate political and industrial rights for all classes. One of the best Family papers in the world. PKICE BY THE YEAR. Single Copy, one year $2.00 Five Copies, u ..7.00 Ten Copies, " 10.00 PKICE FOR HALF A YEAR. Single Copy, half year, $1.00 Five Copies, " 4.00 Ten Copies, " 5.00 WATER-CURE JOURNAL: DEVOTED TO HYDROPATHY, ITS PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE : to Physiology and Anatomy with illustrative Engravings ; to Dietetics, Ex ercise, Clothing, Occupations, and those Laws which govern Life and Health. Published Monthly, in convenient form for binding. PRICE FOR HALF A YEAR. Single Copy, half year $0.50 Five Copies, " , 1 .50 Ten Copies, " 2.50 PRICE BY THE YEAR. .$1.00 Single Copy, one year Five Copies, " 3.00 Ten Copies, " 5.00 PHRENOLOGICAL JOURNAL : A REPOSITORY OF SCIENCE, LITERATURE, AND GENERAL INTEL LIGENCE : devoted to Phrenology, Education, Psychology, Mechanism, Architecture, and to all those Progressive Measures which are calculated to Reform, Elevate, and Improve Mankind. Illustrated with numerous Por traits, and other engravings. PRICE BY THE YEAR. , PRICE FOR HALF YEAR. Single Copy, one year $1 00 | Single Copy, half year $0 50 Five Copies, " 8 00 I Five Copies, " 150 Ten Copies, " 5 00 Ten Copies, " 260 LIFE ILLUSTRATED will be sent to new subscribers three months, in clubs of twenty copies for twenty-five cents each. Subscriptions commence at any time. Please address FOWLER & WELLS, 308 Broadway, New York, Eg^** $3. FOR THREE DOLLARS, in advance, a copy of LIFE ILLUSTRATED (weekly), TIIK PHRENOLOGICAL JOURNAL, and THE WATER-CURE JOURNAL, will be sent a year to one address. Now is the time to subscribe and form Clubs. Messrs. CHICKER1NG & SONS have been awarded 38 Prize Medals, for tlie superiority of their maim fact lire, exhibited by them at the different Fairs in this country and in Europe, during the past 35 years. EIICKI1IIC & Ml, OF e> Warerooms, No. 694 Broadway, New York. ALSO FOR SALE, AT WHOLESALE & RETAIL, Organ Melodeoiis and Organ Harmoniums, IF a/r lours, OlnjLZ-olies, "Vestirioes a,:n.c2- Following Testimonials to the merits of the Piano-Fortes of CHICKERING & SONS have been unhesitatingly given by M. THALBERG. Mnxs HOUSE, Charleston, S. C. , February 2d, 1858. Messrs. J. Sicgling & Son : Gentlemen, I can only repeat that which has been said so often by others, (as well as myself,) that I consider the Chickering is Sons Pianos far beyond compari son, the BEST I have ever seen in America; and I am also happy to add, that they are quite fortunate in being so ably represented in tho South, by so respectable a house as that of J. Siegling & Sou. Yours Respectfully, S. THALBERG. PrrsmiRGH, March 25th, 1858. Mr. Mel lor, Dear Sir : Since my arrival in America I have con stantly used the Pianos of Messrs. Chickoring & Sons, and I can only repeat to you (while thanking you for tho Pianos you have so kindly furnished for my concerts here,) that which I have so often said be fore the instruments aro tho best I have seen in the United States, and will compare favora bly with any I have ever known. Yours, Very Truly, S. TIIALBERG. \tv TV c- RICHMOND, VA., January 14, 1858. _M? ffi > Jc r> ~~ 1 Messrs. CHICKERIXG & So.vs Square Piano-Fortes, and I have much pleasure la certifying that there are no superior instrument* in this country or in Europe. r 1D , Yours, Very Truly, S. THALBERG, Exchange Hotel. Ware Rooms in Boston, . . Tremont Street, Ware Rooms in Philadelphia, 1307 Chestnut Street. THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY WILL INCREASE TO SO CENTS ON THE FOURTH DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY OVERDUE. ZI NOV 7 LIBRARY USE 24 1959 INtER LIPRARY LOAN SE MONTH ARER RECEIPT APR 18 1966 AMERK of furni and student esponding apers read s, and ane( be gleaned country mrsuits, in e papers in irefully hearty df T York His the contril J Sparks, t C. Wint j 3sq., Bei G. Shea, B. O Calh Imith, Esq., Eve William Duane,j , Dr. R. W. Gil liberal patrons the fleeting waifs to form, and Specimen numbers sent upon receipt of fifteen cents in postage stamps. Copies of vol. I. and 11. furnished bound or in numbers. Address all communications to C. BENJAMIN RICHARDSON, Publisher 348 BROADWAY, NEW Y< etuoAQ BROS. MA*E RS U SYRACUSE, --J 6 PAT. JAM-* 1 269564 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY