º
º §
* * *
º \\
º º W
º
Nº.
* * *
N
º N Nº.
\\\\\\
º * W
sº
Aº
š.
W \ N
N N
WW
N \ .
Wºº.
º
* º

– —~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~- --
& ！！ ！！* * · *
*$'
*k.







j
//, //
/ &S &
Jes Jºe
3%. 24,
THE ORATIONS
OF
HYPERIDES FOR LY CO PHRON
AND
º
FOR EUx ENIPPUs;
...-eº.
NOW FIRST PRINTED IN FACSIMH.E WITH A SHORT A CCOUNT OF
THE DISCOVERY OF THE ORIGINAT, MANUSCRIPT Aſſ
WESTERN THE BES IN UPPER EGYPT IN 1847,
BY JOSEPH ARDEN, Esq., F.S.A.
THE TEXT EDITED WITH NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS
BY THE REV. CHURCHILL BABINGTON, M.A., F.L.S.,
FELLOW OF ST JOHN'S COLLEGE, CAM.BRIDGE; *
MEMBER OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LITERATURE, AND EDITOR OF THE FRAGMENTS OF THE ORATION OF
HYPERIDES AGAINST 1) EMOSTHENES.
Non prorsus videtur Spes abjicienda esse, fore ut . . . Hyperidis orationes aliquando ex
situ et tenebris in lucem protrahantur.—KIESSLING.
gºintbridge:
PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
M.DCCC.L.III.

Copies of this Work (price One Guinea) may be obtained by application
to MR. ARDEN, 27 Cavendish Square, London.
TO THE
RIGHT HONOR A BLE
THE LORD LONDESBOROUGH, K.C.H. F.R.S. F.S.A.
&c. &c. &c.
MY DEAR Lord,
pºrt me to dedicate to you this most interesting monument of the eloquence
of ancient Greece: it was first made known at a literary conversazione held
at your Lordship's house, in the spring of the year 1851; and the interest it then
and subsequently excited, has induced me to print it in its present form, with the
following short account of the discovery of the MS.
In the autumn of the year 1846, I travelled in Egypt with my family, ascend-
ing the N ile as far as Nubia. I left England in the month of September; visited
Greece; passing some time at Athens; and commencing my journey on the Nile
early in December; reached Luxor on the first of January, 1847.
I forbear troubling your Lordship with any details of the river journey, visits
to temples, tombs, and ruins, pyramids and caves, all of which have been repeat-
edly described, and by abler hands.
To proceed to the discovery of the papyrus. Having reached Luxor, I halted
there for a day, contrary to the practice of most travellers, who defer the inspection
of remarkable places till they descend the river. My reason for reversing the usual
practice, was, a desire to become acquainted with some of the Arabs who are in
the habit of searching for antiquities among the ruins and tombs, in order to en-
gage their services during my absence, so that I might, on my return, become the
purchaser of any valuable objects which they, in the mean time, might have
discovered. *
On my return I found my precautions justified; for, during my subsequent stay
of eight days at Luxor, and Western Thebes, I was enabled, with the assistance of
several of these men, especially one who was more intelligent than the rest, to
secure several objects of antiquity and interest, amongst them some mummies, one
of which was unrolled in the presence of your Lordship, as President of the
Archaeological Association, at Worcester; and another unfolded to the view of a
distinguished party, at your Lordship's house in London, on the 10th of June,
1850, by Mr Birch, of the British Museum, assisted by Mr Bonomi and other
- - a 2
iy . T)EDICATION. .
gentlemen; the interesting particulars connected with which latter examination
Mr Birch subsequently published. I also obtained two ancient funereal boats, one
of them being of the period of Thothmes the Third, whose name is inscribed
upon it—several Scarabaei, and other remains, besides various papyrus MSS., such
as the Arab excavators are in the habit of collecting for sale. They have learned
that papyri are among the curiosities principally sought after by European and
other travellers, and are in the habit of offering for sale rolls of papyri, often
made up of mere scraps and fragments, which they themselves have ingeniously
stuck together; so that on examination pieces are frequently met with of Hiero-
glyphic, Hieratic, Greek, Coptic, Cufic, and other writings, united in ‘most admired
disorder' in the same roll.
Turing my sojourn at Luxor, from the 13th to the 20th of January 1847,
I paid visits, almost daily, to the district of Western Thebes; particularly to
Gournou. As I was making purchases to some extent, far beyond any other person
then staying at Thebes, I soon became acquainted with many of the Arabs who
reside in the tombs and excavations in that locality, and from two of these men I
first heard of my greatest prize, viz., the papyrus in question, of which I was for-
tunate enough, eventually, to become the possessor.
At first I had some difficulty in obtaining a sight of the treasure reported to
me; the men positively refusing to produce it, unless I would engage to purchase it,
and at the high price which they then demanded. The reason for their behaviour
was afterwards thus accounted for. An old man, an Italian, of the name of Castellari,
who dealt in antiquities, had established himself for many years, past in a dwelling
constructed upon a portion of the roof of the temple at Luxor; and this man, as
I was informed, was in the habit of compelling the poor Arab excavators to sur-
render to him whatever treasure they happened to find, for some very insignificant
amount; he, himself, afterwards disposing of it to travellers, for an enormous sum.
At length, upon my promising not to divulge to Castellari any thing about the
“Letter,” as they called the papyrus, they agreed to bring it down to the boat,
for my inspection; which they did in the course of the same evening, after dark, in
order to avoid observation.
The comparatively high price set upon the MS., the almost perfect appearance
of the roll, evidently genuine, and in its original state—the beautiful character of
the writing; which was partially exposed, in consequence of some small portions of
the outer folds having been broken off; added to the extreme caution observed
by the men; convinced me that they were not altogether wrong in their belief
that they held something of an unusual character, which might prove to be a
rare prize : I therefore determined to possess myself of it at any rate ; and I
eventually did so, for the sum of 350 piastres. In answer to my inquiries, I could
only learn, that the Arabs had discovered it, in their recent excavations at Gournou,
enclosed in one of those small wooden sepulchral boxes or sarcophagi, so frequently
found in the tombs. I endeavoured to elicit from them more exact particulars; but
DEDICATION. , W
was unfortunately unable to obtain them. These are the circumstances under which
the manuscript came into my possession.
Some time after my return to England I shewed this papyrus to several friends,
who were competent judges, especially Mr Bonomi, and Mr Birch; and they con-
firming my supposition of its importance, I then had it carefully unrolled and
mounted in a frame, which was done in an admirable manner by Mr Hogarth;
and in this condition, as I have already stated, it was exhibited at your Lord-
ship's, and excited considerable interest among the scholars and antiquaries then
present.
As soon as it thus became known, the Council of the Royal Society of Literature
asked leave to inspect it. I promptly complied with the request, by placing it for
a week in their rooms, for examination; and it is due to the Society to state, that
the Council accompanied their thanks for my compliance, with the liberal offer to
edit and publish the whole, or any part of the MS.
At one of the meetings of the Society, Mr Birch made some valuable remarks,
in explanation of these two previously unknown Greek Orations. It was then ob-
served, that “the fragments of a papyrus,” shortly before published in fac-simile, by
Mr Harris, of Alexandria, were probably portions of my MS., obtained by him, as
observed in his preface, “from a dealer in antiquities” (probably Castellari) “at
Thebes, of Upper Egypt, in the spring of 1847*.” This also was the period of my
visit to Thebes. $
Thus having been made fully aware of the importance of the literary treasure
which I had secured, I further determined to have a copy of it executed, in fac-
simile, by Messrs Netherclift and Son, to be printed for circulation and distribution
amongst the learned.
It seemed to me desirable that it should appear in this form, not only as the
best method of shewing all the peculiarities of the original text, but because it
has a great value in other points of view, as being by much the earliest MS. of a
Greek writer now known to exist.
In the meantime, whilst the fac-simile was being executed, the Rev. Churchill
Babington, who had already given to the world a very learned edition of the
fragments published by Mr Harris, kindly volunteered to add to the value of my
publication, by preparing a similar edition of the whole text, with critical and
explanatory notes to accompany the fac-simile of the MS. I need hardly say that
Mr Babington's handsome offer was very thankfully accepted. I am thus enabled
to present to the eye of the reader, not only an exact copy of the original MS., but
also a critical edition of the text, by this distinguished scholar, who has already
given such particular attention to the writings of Hyperides.
* Mr Harris adds, “In a visit to Thebes, during the spring of the present year, I used my best endeavours to
ascertain the spot from which these MSS.” (alluding to his before-mentioned fragments) “were taken by the Arab
excavators, but without success. 1st August, 1848.”
vi DEDICATION.
Having undertaken the task of restoring to the world this long-buried treasure,
I am unwilling to send it forth, without seeking for it some especial destination,
where it will be cordially welcomed and duly appreciated.
My Lord, aware of your attachment to literary pursuits generally; Archaeology
especially; I have the honor of dedicating to your Lordship, with all the advantages
it derives from the valuable notes and observations of Mr Babington, the first edi-
tion of the two following orations of Hyperides;–the one, complete, in favor of
Euxenippus, and a large portion of the other, in favor of Lycophron; which I
beg your Lordship will receive as a testimony of the esteem and regard of him who
had the good fortune to discover this valuable relic of antiquity.
I remain,
My dear Lord,
Very sincerely yours,
JOSEPH ARDEN.
CAVENDISH SQUARE, LONDON,
February, 1853.
P. R. E. F. A. C. E.
N the year 1848, A. C. Harris, Esq., M.R.S.L. published a facsimile of the Frag-
ments of the Oration of Hyperides against Demosthenes, which he obtained from
a dealer in antiquities at Thebes in the January of the year preceding. This most
important document however was but partially recovered, the legible portions of
the thirty-two Fragments (only two of which were of any considerable length)
amounting in all to about seventeen columns of the papyrus, and it was tolerably clear
that at least three of these Fragments formed no part of the Oration against
I)emosthenes. What then, we may ask, became of the rest of the papyrus 2 To this
question we are now able to give in part at least a satisfactory eply.
By a most fortunate coincidence a large portion of the remains of the disinterred
Hyperides, after being ruthlessly handled by the excavators who prowl amongst the
Theban tombs, divided between them, and dispersed in different directions, fell
almost simultaneously into the hands of two English gentlemen, who were capable
of appreciating their true value. Part of them came into the possession of Mr Harris
in the manner mentioned above. -
By far the larger share however fell to the lot of Joseph Arden, Esq., F.S.A.,
who has given a spirited and interesting account of the circumstances under which
he became the proprietor of the treasure which is now first edited. He has recovered
fifteen continuous columns of the Apology for Lycophron, to which work three of
Mr Harris’ Fragments appertained; and likewise the Oration for Euxenippus, which
is quite complete and in beautiful preservation. The latter is comprised together
with its title in thirty-three columns.
Whether more scraps of the Apology for Lycophron and of the Oration against
Demosthenes remain to be discovered in some old-curiosity stores or elsewhere at
Thebes, may be worth the inquiry of the learned traveller.
Mr Arden deserves all praise for the zeal which he has shewn in causing a
facsimile of the whole MS. to be made, the earliest, I believe, (mere fragments
only excepted) upon which any work of classical antiquity is preserved. I can
testify, after a careful comparison of it with the MS. itself, that it is hardly pos-
sible to imagine a better copy: and am now able to make the same remark
of Mr Harris' facsimile, executed by himself, having been lately favoured by
that gentleman with a sight of the original.
Mr Arden's discovery has been the subject of two papers published in the
fourth Volume of the Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature (New
viii PRIEFA C E.
Series) by my learned friends Samuel Birch, Esq., F.S.A., &c., and John Hogg,
Esq., M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S., &c., the materials of the latter gentleman's communication
having been partly furnished by myself. These papers however, being written
before the MS. had been completely examined, served mainly to announce its
existence and general character, and were designed not so much to satisfy as to
stimulate curiosity. .
The present Orations, though less important in a historical point of view than
the Harrisian Fragments, are at the same time far better calculated to give us an
idea of the style and merits of their illustrious author, who, by a hard fate has
until recently been almost wholly unknown, albeit that in his own day he was con-
sidered second only to Demosthenes both as an orator and as a statesman. This utter
destruction of his voluminous writings is so much the more remarkable, because
even so late as the ninth century Photius had read “various of his works.” Har-
pocration alone, who probably lived in the fourth century of our era, cites more
than forty of his Orations. The modern scholar will now at least be able to form
some kind of estimate of the judgment of Longinus who writes of our author as
follows: Tô iólköv čxet uétá y\vkútntos jól), Autós épmövvöuevow: ágatot Te Tepi avtåv
elaw da Teiguoi, uvkTrip ToxttukùTatos, evyéveta, Tô kata rās eiptovetas evard Mato Tpov, akaſu-
pata ovk duova'a, ovo’ dvdywya, kata. Tovs 'Attukov’s ékéivovs, dAA’ 67tuketueva, 6taa'vppiós Te
érièéºtos, kal Toxi) To kopuköv kai perd Tatētās evatóxov kévrpov, duiuntov 88, eiteſv, Tó
év Tāori Towtows étraq poèvrov. w
It must be added, however, that the Orations for Lycophron and Euxenippus
are by no means uninteresting even to the historian. Not only are allusions to
several known points of Greek History scattered through them, but we have
here information on subjects which were previously little or not at all known:
such as the government of Lemnos, the name and fate of the general who lost
Sestos, and the political conduct of Hyperides in reference to Diopeithes and
Olympias.
These works likewise contain valuable information respecting the public and
private life of the Athenian people: the limitation of their laws concerning ela'ay-
yeXtat, their marriage processions, and the regulation of their silver-mines. To the
philologist and the scholar they will be undoubtedly acceptable as containing
several grammatical forms, words, and phrases of very unusual occurrence.
So far as my own part in the work is concerned, I have to observe that the
ordinary orthography has been followed in the text, when the MS. reading differs
from it, the latter being noticed in the critical observations which are placed imme-
diately below the text. One or two of the most common peculiarities of the scribe
(e.g. the omission of the t adscript of the dative) are mentioned where they first
occur, but rarely or never afterwards. Certain forms, as yivouai, dipexía, and 6peokduos,
have upon consideration, though not without hesitation, been retained in the text.
In other cases the MS. reading has been followed, but accompanied with a note
intimating that it should probably be corrected. In the very few places where the
PREFA C E. - ix
text appears to have been manifestly corrupted the obelus is employed, and the
proposed alteration is given in the note. The missing letters and words are inclosed
in square brackets, and the letters, of which nothing but a mere trace remains in
the MS., are printed in a smaller type. A new paragraph is denoted by the
symbol “I. .
It now only remains that I should acknowledge the valuable assistance, ever
most willingly accorded, which I have received during the progress of the work
from the Rev. W. H. Bateson, B.D., Public Orator of the University, from the
Rev. J. S. Wood, M.A., and Joseph B. Mayor, Esq. B.A., Fellows of St John's
College, and from F. J. A. Hort, Esq. B. A., Fellow of Trinity College. But for
their help the errors in the following pages would certainly have been more nume-
rous than they are; but I fear that the critic may discover others (not to say
many) yet remaining : mistakes indeed are almost unavoidable in the case of
attempting to restore a mutilated text. My best thanks are likewise due to
Mr Birch, who kindly pleaded in my behalf with Mr Arden that the editorship
might be committed to my hands, and also to the latter gentleman who deemed
me worthy to undertake so difficult but pleasurable a task.
ST JOHN's CoII.EGE, CAMBRIDGE,
February 1853.
Mr Arden desires to return his best thanks to the Syndics
of the Cambridge University Press for their liberality in defraying
the eaſpenses of that part of the Work which was done at the
University Press.
INTRODUCTORY REMAIRRS.
THE MS. containing the two Orations now edited is entirely similar in the form of its charac-
ters, in its orthography, in its mode of division into columns, in the magnitude of those
columns, and finally, in the material on which it is written, to the papyrus, on which fragments
of the Oration of Hyperides against Demosthenes are preserved. In fact both MSS. were procured
at the same place, and very nearly at the same time: and there cannot, I think, be the smallest
doubt that they originally formed parts of one and the same roll of papyrus.
The reader, if he
is so disposed, may consult the remarks on the age and orthography of that MS. which have
been made by M. Böckh, by M. Sauppe, and by myself, in our independent and almost con-
temporaneous” editions of the Fragments of that Oration. Mr Sharpe, M. Sauppe, and others were
disposed to refer it to the age of the Ptolemies: and nothing has since come to my knowledge
* I have made however one or two errors concerning the
orthography, which this opportunity may serve to correct.
The straight line is never found over letters in the middle
of the line (unless it indicate a correction); the ap-
parent exception was deceitful, and arose from a rent in
the papyrus being shaded black in the fac-simile : it is clear
that this mark indicates a stop. I was also mistaken in
thinking that any two consonants could commence a line :
thus my reading & |\\ovs in Fragment 5. Col. 3. l. 4. is
false : M. Böckh has a vuudlyovs, M. Sauppe uta:0átovs,
and Dr Schäfer "EXAnvas: but the true reading of the MS.
is [A]|xaſioſ]s. So also again in Fragm. 15. Col. 1. l. 15.
I wrote et Tós Virov |pytas: where M. Böckh reads eita aº
Tot| KiXtas: and M. Sauppe has et Tds it...]...s: but the
MS. reading is clearly eita aº rept |...as, the whole word
being uncertain, perhaps Téptatás.
* It is only due to M. Böckh and M. Sauppe that I
should apologize to them for having written on the title-
page “now first edited.” They preceded me in fact by
about a year: I did indeed learn just in time to mention it
in a note (when the book was already printed) that M. Böckh
had a paper on the Fragments in the Hallische Literarische
Zeitung : but I was not aware of its nature nor at that
time able to consult a copy. It will thus, I trust, be seen
that it was through ignorance of their labours, not from
any intentional neglect, that I omitted to profit by them.
M. Sauppe has been more successful than M. Böckh or my-
self in perceiving that some of the Fragments fitted together
into one continuous piece of Greek: he was able to combine
pieces of the papyrus seven times, whereas I had only thrice
perceived their true connexion, and M. Böckh only once.
At the same time there are some few passages in M. Sauppe's
text which appear to be faulty, where M. Böckh and I have
hit upon the same restorations or nearly so : and this may
be said even of M. Sauppe's second recension in the Oratores
Attici, after he had seen M. Böckh's paper. There are
likewise several places in which M. Sauppe and M. Böckh
have restored the true readings, where I have missed them.
Still there is a large number of restorations in which all the
three editors perfectly coincide. An anonymous writer in Dr
Th. Bergk's and Dr Julius Caesar's Zeitschrift für die Alter-
thumswissenschaft for 1850, No. 48, p. 378, thus handsomely
expresses himself as to the merits of our respective labours:
—“In vielen Punkten trift Hr. Churchill Babington mit
seinen Vorgângern Zusammen, anderwärts haben die deuts-
chen Bearbeiter das Richtigere getroffen, aber es giebt
auch Stellen, wo die Restitution des englischen Herausge-
bers Beachtung verdient.”
Dr A. Schäfer has instituted a pretty close comparison
between the readings of our respective texts which are all
praised and blamed in turn, and has also hazarded a few
conjectures of his own. In a large number of his criticisms
most persons will be disposed to agree with him ; others are
more questionable, and sometimes inflict no damage at all,
e.g. : “Bedarf es welterer Proben, das Hr. Babington des
griechischen Sprachgebrauchs nicht so máchtig war, um mit
sicherer Hand die Herstellung der Fragmente versuchen
zu können, so führen wir an aus Fr. I* (8), 21 & 6,71, wo
ëld Tt gefordert wird, éture påAatov, wo es étri keºpaxatov
heissen muss.” Jahn's Neue Jahrbucher für Philologie, for
1851, Vol. LXII. Pt. 1, p. 235.
The passage stands thus in my edition, the MS. being
a little damaged where the criticised readings occur.—Tas
ydp dTopdoes Taſtas Tas Virép Töy xpnuditov 'AptáAov
Táo as Guotos m (3ovX) retroinTal kai tās avTós Katd Tár-
Tov, kal ovćeatſ. Tpooyéypape êt à Tu şkaoTov atopaivet'
dAX Tikeºpdxatov ypdalaga, orógov čkaotos élènºpe Xpw-
atov, Tovt’ obv 6¢etAéro... pp. 17, 18.
With respect to the former of these criticisms it is sur-
prising that a man of Dr Schäfer's reputation should have
made it. No doubt Tí is perfectly admissible, but á Ti (6, ti)
is equally good—“Tertia pronominis ea vis est ut interro-
gando sit constitutum; in quo loquendi genere velut corre-
lativa caetera liberrime cum Tis confunditur, ita ut utrumque
relativam s, indirectam interrogationem significet, sed directe
S. suis verbis interrogandi provincia in Öatts cadere non pos-
sit.” Ellendt Lewic. Sophocl. s. v. čaris, Tom. II. p. 386.
Perhaps it is almost superfluous to add another syllable where
b 2
xii INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.
which tends to invalidate that opinion. It is at least certain that it is one of the very earliest
specimens of Greek Palaeography which papyrus has transmitted to modern times.
Of the former Oration contained in Mr Arden's papyrus 16 columns remain (the first of
which is wholly illegible), being the concluding portion of the work: the title is written at the end,
dToMo'yta warép Awkóqpovos, the name of the author being suppressed. The following evidence will
prove that it is the production of Hyperides. In the first place, fragments are extant of an
Oration, Virép Avkóqpovos by Hyperides, and there is no other work now known bearing such a
title. Julius Pollux quotes from it two short sentences and one rare word (vo0peted 6a): the same
word and parts of the same sentences being cited by other grammarians as from Hyperides,
without specification of the title of the speech. The lexicographer entitled Avratrikigrºs is the
only writer except Pollux who mentions the title, and he merely cites one word which occurs
in a clause referred by Pollux to the same Oration '.
None of these citations occur in the papyrus; although the two clauses mentioned may natu-
rally enough have occurred in the parts which are lost. (See notes on p. 3 and p. 5).
* , Fortunately, however, Pollux has one other passage in which he mentions the Oration wrºp
Avkóqipovos, and he gives the substance of a statement made in it, though without quoting the actual
words (Lib. VIII. § 52): 8tt & 6 etoaºyºyeſ}\as kai oux éAdv dºulos fiv "YTreptèns év Tø witép Avköppověs ſpnow.
This remark is in precise accordance with what we find in our papyrus, from which it appears
that the action against Lycophron was an eigayyeXta, and that the accuser was dichºvvos. Hyperides
speaking in the person of Lycophron discusses one of the charges às gy tº kºmatº fittágavré as Śre
Tºv eta'ayyeXtav čátēodav. (Col. 3) and proceeds to add (Col. 6) dAA’ oiaat, 6 &vêpes ðucaatai, Tox\d
TAeovekrova w św tois dyóatv ot Kathyopot Töv ‘pevyövtovº oi uév ydp Šid to drivévvov alſTois eival Tów dyóva
pgółws & Ti äv 3otſ\ovtat Aéyova, kai katayeſ}ovrat. These passages are almost perfect, and certainly
bear out the statement of Pollux, but the precise place alluded to appears to occur in the 10th
column, which is much mutilated, but which may be restored as follows:
Kai éué uév airtà év Tà eigayyeMiº Kata\ſetu Töv 87uov trapagatvovta Tows vówovs, autos & wreptmößgas
Távtas Toijs vóuous eiday) extav čáčokas Virép Öv Ypapal Tpós Toºs Beguofféras €k Töv vóatov stalv, tva Tpótov
pév drivºvvos etains eſs rov dyöva, Tetta K. T. A. -
It appears therefore from the papyrus that the prosecutor (Lycurgus) preferred an elaayyeXta
against Lycophron, because one of the ‘peculiarities of this kind of cause' was, ‘that the informer
incurred no penalty whatever upon failing to obtain a verdict (Smith, Dict. Ant. s. v. eiday-
yeXta); and this precisely agrees with what Pollux affirms to be stated by Hyperides in the
Oration for Lycophron, although he does not appear to be aware that his remarks must be
limited to those eigayºyexial only which have reference to Kákoats, or outrage done to widows,
heiresses, and other helpless persons, under which class the eigayyeXta against Lycophron was,
unjustly perhaps, included by Lycurgus. See Smith's Dict, ut supra; also Meier, Att. Proc.
pp. 44, and 269: Schöm. ad Isaeum, p. 470, (referred to by Sauppe, Oratt. Att, pars poster. 268).
There can then, I think, be no question that Pollux refers to the same Oration that we have
in our papyrus'. M. Böckh and M. Sauppe, as well as myself, had supposed that Fragments 9, 13,
the case is so clear, but the two following passages of Xe- l
nophon will, I suppose, vindicate my reading beyond all
possibility of exception —6 Sé Ka}\Atas Xoy uépos, épm,
Xéºyev, 6 Xaputón, êt à T. &ri Tevig uéya q}povets. Xen.
Sympos. 4, 29. |Xen.
Cyrop. viii. 4, 13; (the word being indifferently written & 8
éxots &v eitely 3, 6 Ti ; "Eyoºye.
Tt (§ 6, ti) or 316tt. See Bornemann's Index to the Cyro-
paedia, &c.) With regard to his other remark, it is possible
that éiri kepaxatov may be the true reading; but I cannot
perceive that étruce pdxatov is a barbarism or indefensible. If
the verb étuce paNatów can be used in much the same sense
as kepaxatów, (and this was proved in the note), is there
any absurdity in supposing that the noun étute paNatov may
be used to signify a summary, much like the simple kepd-
év Tó ‘YTeptèov wºrép Avképpovos eipov yeſ/papué-
vov , , vewptov Tpoëoaſtav % dpxetov éutupuaadv à kata-
XnViv čkpas.“ Pollux, Lib. Ix. § 156.
‘Yºrépétèms ºrép Awkóqipovos. Antiatticista in Bekk. Anecd.
$ p
eatyptoſuos º
Graec. Vol. I. p. 97. GuTuptop 6s oitos ‘YTepetëns nueXm-
uévos, Ščov ćutpnguós Aeyev. Phryn. Epitom. s. v. čuTv-
ploads.
Xatov :
- ‘YTepetëns.
Again, ‘Yºréptèns év Tó UTép Avkóqpovos kai Tô wºrd
Töv ToMAóv ôvouaguevov xetpérypa pov Xéipa ováuagev
,, Otte ydp Tºv ćavtov xeipa ëſuatov dpvijaa-
Poll. Lib. II. ſ 152. Xeipa Tó xeipóypapov
Bachm. Anecd. Graec. Tom. I. p. 414, et
3. * º
€17ſ (Ol)
orðat.“
Suidas s. v.
* There is not much doubt that the Lea icon Rhetori-
cum, from which Eustathius (Comment. in Hom. Odyss.
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. xiii
17 of Mr Harris' papyrus formed no part of the Oration against Demosthenes. Now Fragments
9 and 13 (to the latter of which the letters composing Fragment 28 may safely be referred, and
perhaps also those in Fragment 31) agree so exceedingly well with what we read in Col. 9 of
Mr Arden's papyrus, (see the notes), that it becomes highly probable that they formed the exor-
dium of the Oration for Lycophron. The remarks are general, it is true, but there is every
thing to favour the supposition, and nothing to oppose it. Fragment 17 appears to be connected
both with Mr Arden's papyrus, and also with a fragment preserved in Pollux. (See the notes
on pp. 4, 5.) Thus it appears in no great degree doubtful that among Mr Harris' fragments we
have several which formed the earlier parts of the Oration of Hyperides for Lycophron. A few
words concerning the nature, argument, and probable date of the Oration must now be added.
The indictment was a species of criminal information which is termed an eigayºyexia : and
it was originally designed to meet those cases for which no special laws were provided: but in later
times accusers were glad to bring their charges under this form, if possible, however unfairly, for
the reason (among others) mentioned a little above. The counsel for the prosecution were Lycur-
gus and others, whose names are not mentioned. Fourteen fragments of the Orations of Lycurgus
against Lycophron are extant, (see Sauppe's Oratt. Att. Fragmenta, pp. 267—269): there can
be no question that they refer to the Lycophron, whom Hyperides defended ; and it does no
small credit to the penetration of M. Meier and M. Sauppe, that they should have arrived at
that conclusion, from data which were then so imperfect. The counsel for the defence were
Hyperides and Theophilus. The speech of Hyperides is written in the first person, and is
supposed to be spoken by Lycophron.
Lycophron was an Athenian citizen, who was for some time a subordinate officer (póAapxos)
in the cavalry, having been previously employed in the superintendence of the Knights’ horses
as TTorpāqos, in which station, if Hyperides tell truth, he gave great satisfaction, and always
bore an excellent character in the capital. He was then promoted to be general of the cavalry
(trirapyos) in Lemnos, was continued in office two years, a longer time than any of his
predecessors had been, and staid there during the year following, in all which period he
gave no offence to any one, and received crowns from the cities of Myrina and Hephæstia in
testimony of their admiration of his liberal conduct. This part of the Oration (Coll. 14, 15) is
historically speaking the most valuable, and supplies us with information on points which were
formerly little known. He was advanced in life (fifty years old) when the following accusations
were brought.
The main charge in the indictment was that of adultery with the betrothed wife of one Charip-
pus, her second husband, but the speech contained several others, and Hyperides complains bitterly
that the accuser has heaped together all manner of calumnies, which were foreign to the subject.
Among these are to be mentioned some proceedings (of Lycophron 1) in violation of the provisions
of a will, contingent upon the death of a certain child; Hyperides argues that the course which
the accusers took in reference to Euphemus, one of the parties concerned, and apparently a
relation of the woman, demonstrates Lycophron’s innocence. What these proceedings were it is
impossible, in consequence of the brevity of the Fragments, to determine with any certainty.
There are also some remarks relating to the transactions of an unscrupulous informer named
Ariston and his accomplice, Theoctistus, who invested the money which Ariston raised by
extortion, in slaves, to their mutual advantage: but the exact nature of these negotiations
and their connexion with the case of Lycophron, cannot easily be discovered.
With regard to the principal crime, Hyperides argues that Lycophron could not possibly
have made certain observations to the wife of Charippus as she was moving in the marriage proces-
sion, (and this was one of the charges against him), because he could not have failed to have been
overheard and chastised both by Charippus and by a large concourse of attendants. This part
of the Oration is likewise important, because it presents before our eyes the order in which
nuptial processions were conducted. He also maintains that the indictment should have been a
p. 1399, Ed. Rom.) quotes, alludes to the Oration for Lyco- yduois. Hesychius has the same gloss in a shorter form,
phron: év 33 bntoptrº Aeëtkö ºr eiota, Kai éiri yduov s. v. Tponynths' 6 Tponyoſaevos Too Čečyovs. See the
Towarms, kal Tponynthp pagu dir' attoo, kai Tponym- notes on Col. 5, 1. 21, at p. 2, s. v. Toonſynths,
y * * arº p e A. 9 *
Tijs Tap 'ATTukots O TOU Çetyovs myovuevos év Tots
xiv INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.
opaq)), and is consequently bad. Hyperides moreover argues for the innocence of Lycophron
from his previous good character, during a long life, and concludes by summoning Theophilus to
come forward in his defence. -
The date of the Oration cannot, perhaps, be very accurately determined. Lycurgus was born
about B.C. 396, and died B.C. 323: Hyperides was probably born about the same time, and died
B.C. 322. Now Lycurgus in early life devoted himself to philosophy, but at the time of this
Oration he had established his reputation as a pleader, “who was not inexperienced in speaking,
and had been frequently accustomed to address juries,” (Col. 15). If we suppose that he was
not less than 40 years of age the limits will lie between B.C. 356 and 322. Again, among those
who were attendants in the procession were “Dioxippus,” (who appears to have been brother of
the young widow,) “and Euphraeus his fellow-wrestler who are confessedly the strongest men
among the Greeks,” (Col. 5). Now the following passage occurs in Athenaeus (Lib. VI. c. 57.
vol. 1. p. 546. Dind.): “Aristobulus the Casandrian relates, that Dioxippus the Athenian pan-
cratiast, when Alexander was on one occasion hurt and the blood flowed from him, applied to
him the verse of Homer (Il. e. 340): "Ixºp of s tep te péet uakápea at €eolai.” Again, Curtius (Lib.
Ix. c. 29) tells us of a combat in India between “Dioxippus the Athenian, a noble pugilist"
and Horratas a Macedonian, which occurred B. c. 326. Dioxippus died a few days afterwards.
(See Addenda). -
Now Dioxippus was in his prime at the time when our Oration was delivered; so that
its date must be placed at the beginning of Alexander's reign, or not very much before it. The
great similarity, in fine, between the Orations for Lycophron and Euxenippus, both as to argu-
ment and diction, suggests that they may have been composed about the same time. The latter
was certainly delivered in Alexander's reign, and so very probably was the former.
The second Oration is perfect (except that a few letters are missing in some places) and
consists of 32 columns, exclusive of the title, which is written in a cursive character, and
occupies a column by itself: the title is also subscribed in uncials at the end of the papyrus;
in both places it stands thus: Utrép Evževittov eta aſy/exias diroMo'yta Tpos IIoMáevktov. The Gram-
marians quote two Orations of Hyperides, delivered in opposition to Polyeuctus, (kard IIoxvelſkrov
Tepi Too ðaypauwatos, and another Tpós IIoxſevktov): also a third, entitled Tepi Too IIoMáevictov a Tpa-
tnyeiv. The Fragments of these Orations are collected in Sauppe's Oratores Attici, (pp. 298,
299); but the present work is not the same as any of them; nor has it any connexion with
them. * .
Harpocration, however, in his Lexicon s. v. AyagucAñs mentions without specifying the Oration
that “ Hyperides speaks of him. An Oration also of Dinarchus was written against him, from
which it appears that he bribed the members of the township called Halimus, and so, though
a foreigner, was enrolled as a citizen of the state.” Both the man and the crime are men-
tioned in the beginning of the present Oration (Col. 19). “Agasicles,” we read, “was
impeached in an eigayyeXta, because he was enrolled among the members of the township
Halimus'.”
Internal evidence, likewise, manifestly indicates the author to be no other than Hyperides.
We read (Col. 26) that on one occasion Polyeuctus was defended “by ten advocates from the
tribe AEgeis of whom I was one.” Hyperides was a member of the township Collytus, which ap-
pertained to the tribe AEgeis. Again, the author mentions, with particulars, that he had impeached
in eigayyehta, Aristophon the Azenian, and Diopeithes the Sphettian, also Philocrates the Hagnusian,
for the services he had rendered to Philip of Macedon. (Coll. 38, 39.) Now the Grammarians
several times quote and allude to the Oration of Hyperides, card Apatopóvros (viz. Aristophon
the Azenian”) ; and Demosthenes expressly informs us that Hyperides accused Philocrates in an
eigayyexia; and he is mentioned in connexion with Philip. See Fragments, &c. in Sauppe's
* Pollux was perhaps acquainted with the Oration for * So at least Dr A. Schäfer supposes, who has examined
Euxenippus: he notices the same use of the words Kawoto- the history of Aristophon with great care. See Schneidewin's
aia and avatórypapos that is found there, and nowhere else, Philolog. Vol. 1. p. 215. It is sometimes difficult to decide
as it appears, in Attic Greek. No inference, however, can be whether Aristophon the Azenian or Aristophon the Collytian
securely drawn from this circumstance. is intended by ancient writers.
ſº
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. XV
Oratores Attici, (pp. 282, 301.) Putting all circumstances together, we cannot doubt that the
genuineness of this Oration is satisfactorily established.
The eigayyexía against Euxenippus was conducted by the eminent orators Polyeuctus and
Lycurgus: the accused was defended by Hyperides and an advocate whose name is not given,
whose speech preceded that of Hyperides: the cause was heard in the court of Heliaea.
Euxenippus was an Athenian citizen, who had occupied no public station, but had acquired
a considerable fortune. At the time of his trial he was advanced in years, and among his chil-
dren (some of whom at least accompanied him on this occasion), was a daughter who had
married a person of the name of Philocles. We do not appear to have any other knowledge of
him than what the present oration supplies".
The principal charge in the indictment was this, that Euxenippus was bribed by certain
Athenians to give a false report of the oracular dream, which he was commissioned by the State
to wait for in the temple of Amphiaraus. The question on which the God's opinion was sought
respected the legality of the occupation of certain lands, said to be consecrated to himself, by the
tribes Acamantis and Hippothoontis. (See the notes on pp. 9, 10.) Polyeuctus also introduced
numerous other matters into his oration, against which conduct Hyperides remonstrates, main-
taining them to be beside the question. One of these was the attachment of Euxenippus to the
Macedonian interest; for he is said to have co-operated with Olympias in procuring the dedication
of a patera to the Goddess of Health in her temple at Athens. He was likewise accused of
having acquired wealth by unfair means, and of other crimes of a private nature.
The argument of Hyperides is partly technical, partly general. In the first place the indict-
ment was bad ; for it was impossible to conclude the charge brought against Euxenippus under
the law which limited the subjects of an eigayyexia. The clause under which alone Euxenippus
could possibly be impeached had reference to orators only: , párop &v u Xéyn Tà épigra Tó &#ap
Tô A6mvatov : Euxenippus being no orator but a private individual”, the indictment must be quashed.
He insists on this argument at great length, contrasting the grave crimes against the State which
in earlier times were the subjects of eigayyextat with the paltry offences which were now tried
under that form. Matters of importance, such as the loss of a fleet or of an army, were once
deemed the only proper subjects for this mode of proceeding: but now the reports of dreams
and the payment of dancing-girls! Besides, the charge was false; for if there were Athenians
who had bribed Euxenippus, why did not Polyeuctus name them, and bring them to trial
The truth was clear: Polyeuctus was actuated by spite: he had brought forward on a previous
occasion upon the report made by Euxenippus, an ill-considered motion for the restoration of
the lands to Amphiaraus ; which was so inconsistently drawn up that it was rejected and the
mover fined, the veracity of Euxenippus being not in the least called in question by that
decision. But because Polyeuctus had mismanaged the business, Euxenippus to be sure must
be condemned for it ! Then as to the matter about Olympias: it was entirely and notoriously
false that Euxenippus was in any way connected with her or any of her party in Athens, whose
names were well enough known. Polyeuctus took no pains to accuse her real partisans, but
only Euxenippus, in order to create a prejudice against him. Hyperides then in an interesting
passage shews that the Athenians could not complain with justice of the conduct of Olympias,
for they themselves had adorned the shrine of Dione in a temple at Dodona, which was in the
Molossian dominions of Olympias. As to the charges against Euxenippus's private life, he scorns
to enter into such irrelevant questions, and with respect to his riches (which we may suspect
consisted in silver-mines) he shews by instancing recent actions respecting property in the
mines, how much the Athenian courts were disposed to discourage sycophancy, and to protect
the just gains of the citizens. He concludes by an exhortation to the dicasts to inspect the
provisions of the laws concerning eigayyeXtal, and to give the verdict according to them and
to their oaths. The date of the speech must certainly be placed in the times of Alexander,
probably in the early part of his reign. (See notes on pp. I 1, 12).
* It is certainly possible, as Mr Birch suggests, that the Orators, when there was no special purpose to be
he may be the same person as the Archon Eponymus, effected (see note on p. 8), appears to have been only a
B c. 305, yet if our Euxenippus were alive at that time, he popular and not a legal one. See Smith's Dict. Gr. and
must have been a very old man. Rom. Ant. s. v. pntoptiºn ypaſpiſ.
* This distinction however, though sometimes made by *
-*
ADDENDA ET
* - - : ſt
*…* - - :- - Ye * *. - *. -
CORRIGENDA.
Col. 2, 1.18, for av read &y.
l. 24, kai Ötöða w śortrep Tois Amaraís étuoſtruguêv) Hyperides
seems to mean that Theoctistus furnished Ariston’s slaves
with food, and kept them in readiness like a band of pi-
rates, for any service that might be required. If Dionysius
(as suggested in the note), and not Theoetistus himself,
was the nominative to etxey in line 2, we must suppose that
Theoctistus let the slaves to him at a profit. On the subject
of slave-labour in the Attic mines see Mr Cornwall Lewis' re-
marks at the end of his translation of Böckh's Public Economy
of Athens. - -
Col. 3, 1. 26, Širos pº) TAmoridorm] This is one of many pas-
Sages which opposes the very improbable canon of Dawes that
ôtros may be joined to the 2nd aor, act. Subj., but not to the
lst aor, act. Subj.
Col. 4, l. 11, for roºr' otºk Čort read raûr oëk art.
Col. 5, l. 4, Atóšurtrov] Athenaeus, Lib. VI. c. 57 : Apugró8ov)\os
ôé pmotu 6 Kaoravöpets Atóšttirov Tów A6mvalov Taykpartaorſiv Tpo6évros
troté row AAečávôpov kai aiparos fiéovros eitréiv
-- "Ixºp oiás Trép re fiéet pakápéoot 6eolotv.
Q. Curtius, Lib. IX. c. 29. Intererat epulis Dioxippus
Atheniensis, pugil nobilis, et ob eximiam virtutem virium regi
pernotus et gratus. The historian goes on to say that he
overcame in single combat a Macedonian named Horratas, but
a few days afterwards destroyed himself. The combat men-
tioned by Curtius took place B.C. 326. See Thirlwall’s Hist.
of Greece, c. LIV. No doubt Dioxippus set out with Alexander,
when he crossed the Hellespont B.C. 334, and continued with
him all along during his expedition. Hence it may be concluded
with great probability that the Oration for Lycophron was
delivered but little before 334 B.C., for Hyperides speaks of
him as being 6poNoyoupévos ioxupératos Tów ‘ENAjvov, and a pugi-
list's career is necessarily of limited duration.
Dioxippus would appear to have been the kūpuos of the
widow. He is the only person mentioned in this Oration (ex-
cept Lycurgus and Lycophron) respecting whom I have been
able to discover anything from other sources. Some of the
other proper names occur in the Orators, &c., but they cannot
easily be identified with the persons mentioned in the papyrus,
1. 14, toà ºrpooyupuaa toû airoël his fellow-wrestler rather than
his trainer, as suggested in the note.
1. 21, for Tavrov read Trávrov.
Col. 6, l. 19, for 6pkows read Špkots.
1. 22, for "Hpov read ‘Hpak\ffs, and cancel the note. The
final letters were probably written in a small character in the
MS. Compare the general character assigned to Hercules by .
the dramatists.
Col. 8, 1, 17, arrange the text thus: oilov kai aſārēs] oirogi
évéxet [Špoi Öelvös] | év tá ka[rmyopig oil 8' diroMoyeſoróat éâ], |el Töv dºva-
Bawó]vrov intéſp époil] avvairoMoyngopé]vov ôtſkatoº ris, ei Šej|p),
diro[Aéis oró ye, vi) Atál. i. e. and this is the very feeling which
Lycurgus displays towards me in his accusation, and is not for
permitting any of the advocates on my side to defend me if
they claim to speak, for if they do, he vows that he will be
the ruin of them. For the sentiment compare Coll. 25–27 in
the Oration for Euxenippus. . Such appears to be the general
sense of the passage, but the papyrus is so much damaged
that the text cannot be recovered with certainty. -
Col. 10, 1, 19, correct the text thus: £re[i]ral ééſis ſpaylº-
8taslypſávas Tiju eio'ayyekſtav #v]Tep viv | yéypſaſpas]. If €iffs be
right, it must of course be referred to éémpt, nor can the MS.
easily have had any other word, except possibly £epffs. Can
the scribe have accidentally written ééiffs for 8tečius (from
8.4%gui) 2. The remainder of the column is, I fear, too hope-
lessly mutilated to be restored, but is probably preceded
ºrpoojket: the sense of it was perhaps as follows: “and that you
may lay to my charge that I have been the guilty cause of
this widow’s remaining henceforth all her life long unmarried,
as she ought not to be, according to the spirit of our laws,”
viz. because it is impossible that Charippus can continue to
live with her on the supposition of my guilt. The scope of
Lycophron’s reply seems to be as follows: “You are more
justly amenable to this charge than I am : unless she received
a portion and married she must of course have remained a
widow at home all her life long : and you falsely pretend that
Euphemus had a sinister motive in giving her a portion, and
that there are reasons why, after being betrothed to Charip-
pus, she cannot live with him.” It is very difficult to divine in
what the Toympia of Euphemus was alleged to consist, whether
in some sort of collusion with Lycophron or in some other
particular. Can it possibly have any connexion with the will
mentioned in Fragment 17 of Mr Harris' papyrus P --
Col. 12, 1. 27, dAN # Tá[\al pot Tplóreativ. This is not the
MS. reading: before the o is a trace of the upper stroke of
a T. Read [Totočjtós éattv. &
Col. 13, l. 16, in Torpoq6v See the Fragment of the immo-
Tpópos of Mnesimachus in Meineke's Fragm. Com. Graec. Vol.
III. pp. 568–570, and his notes.
Col. 28, l. 12, for firtó read jyo5.
reading.
This is clearly the MS.
Possibly the mark above the line may be meant to
indicate the aspirate: in line 8 it occurs likewise. The marks
of aspiration and of diaeresis are in general omitted in the
M.S.: yet the latter is found in Col. 27, and elsewhere.
Col. 42, l. 25, ſoió' Aónvaiot: the letters enclosed in brackets
are not rightly supplied, there is a vestige of an a at the be-
ginning of the line, and the next letter which is legible appears
to be a k : probably the text is 3DNA of Öljkatov. .
Col. 49, 1. 21, travöta : this is the scribe's correction; the
original word was 8trata.
p. 1, in the notes, Col. 1. There are no sufficient data for
determining whether the passages cited from the Oration of
Lycurgus against Lycophron have any connexion with the
transactions mentioned by Hyperides or not,
p. 1, in the notes, Col. 2. rô &ptorov Tovtovi trpáyparos seems
to be used like our ironical English phrase, the best part of
the whole story. The text is probably sound, but the expres-
sion is extraordinary. 3 -
p. 2, in the critical notes, for ſakov]áv read [akov]6.
p. 11, in the notes, Col. 1, l. 11, for ‘the present Oration’
read ‘it.” . . . ~,
ERRA.T A.
Col. 4, 1, 23, for Ös fiye, read & #ye. The MS. has a dot placed over the
s, which is probably intended to cancel it.
Col. 14, l. 20, oùre &muoorig oièeis: the last word should be cancelled: there
are faint strokes made over it in the MS.
Col. 19, l. 11, for toãrov jo'av, read Töre forav, which is certainly the cor-
rection intended.
Id. l. 23, for éveypáſq6m]: the 2nd aorist passive is the common form; which
Prof. Schneidewin suggests should be read: yet the MS. seems to have had
ample room for 3 letters: and Hyperides is known to have been addicted to
rare inflections. The 1st aor. passive is found in Archimedes.
Col. 39, l. 10, sqq. punctuate thus: 8tét}\ouro, tod óñpov airats 66wros' toiro
rô Špos éAaxey 'Akapavris Kai ‘ITToôoovris. (Schneidewin. in litt.)
Col. 43, l. 2, for oire 6eos, read oëre éévos, which is undoubtedly the cor-
rection intended by the scribe. .
In the notes, p. 7, col. 1, “Pixov 6 & 'Avatov est &muárms Atticus. De-
monstrare possum "Avata pagum fuisse.” (Schneidewin.)
p. 7, col. 2, Öpigris: see Hase and Dindorf’s edition of Stephen's Greek
Thesaurus, s. v. for more information.
Most of the above corrections have been suggested by a friendly note from
Prof. Schneidewin, who has seen the proofs, but not the plates, since the book
was printed, before its publication.
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE ALBERT, K.G., CHANCELLOR OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE.
Adams, John Couch, Esq., M.A., F.R.S., W.P.R.A.S., Fellow
of Pembroke College, late Fellow and Tutor of St John's
College, Cambridge.
Ainslie, The Rev. Gilbert, D.D., Master of Pembroke College,
Cambridge.
Ashpitel, Arthur, Esq., F.S.A., Old Broad Street.
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH AND
QUEENSBERRY, K.G., F.R.S.
RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF BURLINGTON,
F.R.S., Chancellor of the University of London.
THE LORD BURGHLEY, M.P.
THE HON. JOHN DUNCAN BLIGH, D.C.L.
Bacon, James, Esq., Q.C., Lincoln's Inn.
Baker, The Rev. T., M.A., The Rectory, Whitburn, Sunderland.
Barrow, The Rev. John, M.A., Fellow and Junior Bursar of
Queen's College, Oxford.
Bateson, The Rev. W. H., B.D., Public Orator, Bursar and
Senior Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge.
Beaumont, Sir George H. Bart., Cole Orton Hall, Leicester-
shire.
Beaumont, W. B., Esq., M.P., Bywell Hall, Newcastle on Tyne.
Berkeley, The Rev. M.J., M.A., F.L.S., King's Cliffe, Northamp-
tonshire.
Birch, A. F., Esq., M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cam-
bridge, and Assistant Master of Eton College.
Birch, The Rev. H. M., M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cam-
bridge, and Chaplain in Ordinary to Her Majesty.
Birch, The Rev. H.R., M.A., The Vicarage, Southwold, Suffolk.
Birch, Samuel, Esq., F.S.A., British Museum. .
Blackie, John Stuart, Esq., Professor of Greek in the Uni-
versity of Edinburgh.
Blakesley, The Rev. J. W., B.D., late Fellow and Tutor of
Trinity College, Cambridge, The Vicarage, Ware.
Blewitt, The Rev. J. W., M.A., Bloxham, near Banbury.
Bliss, The Rev. Philip, D.C.L., F.S.A., Principal of St Mary's
Hall, Oxford, Registrar of the University.
Bloxam, The Rev. J. R., D.D., Fellow and Librarian of Mag-
dalen College, Oxford.
Blunt, The Rev. J. J., B.D., Lady Margaret's Professor of
Divinity, and late Fellow of St John's Coll., Cambridge.
Bonomi, Joseph, Esq., M.R.S.L., No. 19, Beaufort Street,
Chelsea.
Botfield, Beriah, Esq., M.A., F.R.S., No. 10, Sackville Street,
London. -
THE
Brockedon, W., Esq., F.R.S., No. 29, Devonshire Street,
Queen's Square.
Brumell, The Rev. E., B.D., President, Tutor, and Senior
Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge.
Bryce, Archibald Hamilton, Esq., B.A., of Trinity College,
Dublin; Classical Master of the High School, Edinburgh.
Bunbury, E. H., Esq., M.A., M.P., late Fellow of Trinity Col-
lege, Cambridge, No. 15, Lincoln's Inn Fields.
Burchell, Harper, Esq., The Grange, Bushey, Herts.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF CARLISLE, Pre-
sident of the Royal Society of Literature.
THE RIGHT REW. THE LORD BISHOP OF CHICHES-
TER.
Cabbell, Benjamin Bond, Esq., M.P., F.R.S., F.S.A., No. 52,
Portland Place.
Campbell, The Rev. A. M., M.A., Sussex Gardens, Hyde Park.
Carey, Joseph, Esq., Chester Place.
Cartmell, The Rev. James, D.D., Master of Christ's College,
Cambridge.
Chaffers, The Rev. Thomas, M.A., Vice-Principal and Tutor of
Brasenose College, Oxford.
Chevallier, The Rev. Temple, B.D., Professor of Mathematics
in the University of Durham, late Fellow and Tutor of
St Catharine's Hall, Cambridge, and Hulsean Lecturer.
Clark, W. G., Esq., M.A., Fellow and Assistant Tutor of
Trinity College, Cambridge.
Coles, Henry Beaumont, Esq., M.P., No. 25, Portman Square.
Colquhoun, P., Esq., LL.D., Librarian of the Royal Society of
Literature, St Martin’s Place. *.
Conington, J., Esq., M.A., Fellow of University Coll., Oxford.
Corrie, The Rev. G. E., D.D., Master of Jesus College, Cam-
bridge, Norrisian Professor of Divinity.
Coxe, The Rev. H. O., M.A., Corpus Christi College, Sub-
Librarian of the Bodleian Library, Oxford. §
Croker, Thomas Crofton, Esq., Gloucester Road, Old Brompton.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF DERBY, K. G.,
Chancellor of the University of Oxford.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF DARNLEY. (2 copies.)
THE RIGHT REW. THE LORD BISHOP OF DURBAM.
Dobson, The Rev. William, M.A., Principal of Cheltenham
College, late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Dundas, The Right Hon. Sir David, Knt., M.A., Q.C., No. 13,
King's Bench Walk, Temple.
2 LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF ELLESMERE.
Edwards, The Rev. John, M.A., Professor of Greek in the
University of Durham.
Evans, The Rev. Charles, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College,
Cambridge.
Evans, T. W., Esq., M.A., Allestree Hall, Derby.
Field, The Rev. T., M.A., Fellow and Assistant Tutor of St
John's College, Cambridge.
Forster, J ohn, Esq., Inner Temple.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF GLENGALL.
Gaisford, The Very Rev. Thomas, D.D., Dean of Christ
Church, Oxford, Regius Professor of Greek.
Gladstone, The Right Hon. W. E., M.A., M.P., Chancellor of
the Exchequer.
Goulburn, The Right Hon. H., M.A., M.P., Beechworth House,
Surrey.
Griffiths, The Rev. John, M.A., Sub-Warden and Tutor of
Wadham College, Oxford.
Griffith, The Rev. John, D.D., Prebendary of Rochester, late
Fellow and Tutor of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.
Grote, George, Esq., No. 12, Savile Row, London.
Grote, The Rev. John, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College,
Cambridge; The Vicarage, Trumpington.
Guest, Edwin, Esq., LL.D., F.R.S., Master of Gonville and
Caius College, Cambridge.
THE REW, THE LORD ARTHUR HERVEY, M.A.
THE HON. R. C. HERBERT, M.A.
Hamilton, William Richard, Esq., F.R.S., No. 12, Bolton
Row, Piccadilly.
Hamond, W. Parker, Esq., M.A., Pampisford Hall, Cam-
bridgeshire.
Hare, The Ven. Archdeacon, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity
College, Cambridge, Hurstmonceaux, Sussex.
Hawkins, The Rev. Edward, D.D., Provost of Oriel College,
and Ireland Professor, Oxford, and Canon of Rochester.
Haywood, F., Esq., Edge Hall, Liverpool. !
Henslow, The Rev. J. S., M.A., F.L.S., Professor of Botany in
the University of Cambridge.
Hogg, J., Esq., M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S., Foreign Secretary of the
Royal Society of Literature, late Fellow of St Peter's
College, Cambridge.
Holden, The Rev. H. A., M.A., Fellow and Assistant Tutor of
s Trinity College, Cambridge.
Holland, Henry, Esq., M.R.S.L., No. 46, Montague Square.
Hopkins, The Rev. W. B., M.A., Fellow and Tutor of St Catha-
rine's Hall, Cambridge.
Hort, F. J. A., Esq., B.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Cam-
bridge.
Humphreys, E. R., Esq., M.A., LL.D., Head Master of the
Grammar School, Cheltenham.
Hymers, The Rev. John, D.D., F.R.S., Tutor, and Senior
Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge, and Lady Mar-
garet's Preacher.
Inglis, Sir Robert Harry, Bart., D.C.L., M.P., Milton Bryant,
Bedfordshire.
Jackson, Edward Steane, Esq., M.A., Totteridge, Herts.
Jenkyns, The Rev. H., D.D., Canon of Durham, and Professor
of Divinity in the University of Durham, late Fellow of
Oriel College, Oxford.
Jenkyns, The Very Rev. R., D.D., Dean of Wells, and Master
of Balliol College, Oxford.
Jeremie, The Rev. J. A., D.D., Regius Professor of Divinity,
Subdean of Lincoln, and Senior Fellow of Trinity College,
Cambridge.
Kennedy, The Rev. B. H., D.D., Head Master of Shrewsbury
School, Prebendary of Lichfield, and late Fellow of St
John's College, Cambridge.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF LANESBOROUGH.
THE RIGHT HON. AND RIGHT REW. THE LORD
BISHOP OF LONDON.
THE RIGHT REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF LICHFIELD.
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD LYNDHURST, F.R.S.,
High Steward of the University of Cambridge.
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD LONDESBOROUGH,
K.C.H., F.R.S.
Leake, Col. W. Martin, L.L.D., F.R.S., No. 50, Queen Anne
Street, London.
Lee, John, Esq., L.L.D., F.R.S., F.R.A.S., late Fellow of St
John's College, Cambridge, Hartwell House, Bucks.
Lindsay, The Rev. John, M.A., F.S.A., Stanford on Avon.
Long, George, Esq., M.A., 12 Hanover Crescent, Brighton,
late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Lonsdale, The Rev. J. G., Reader at the Temple, No. 4,
Chester Place, Regent's Park.
Macbride, J. D., Esq., D.C.L., Principal of Magdalen Hall,
Oxford. f
Madden, Sir Frederic, K.H., F.R.S., Keeper of the Manuscripts
in the British Museum.
Malden, Henry, Esq., M.A., Professor of Greek, University
College, London, late Fellow of Trinity College, Cam-
bridge.
Marsden,The Rev. J. H., B.D., Disney Professor of Archaeology,
late Fellow of St John's College, Cambridge, and Hul-
Sean Lecturer.
Mayor, John E. B., Esq., M.A., Fellow of St John's College,
Cambridge. 2-
Mayor, Joseph B., Esq., B.A., Fellow of St John's College,
Cambridge.
Mayor, The Rev. R. B., B.D., Fellow of St John's College,
Cambridge.
Merivale, The Rev. Charles, B.D., late Fellow and Tutor of St
John's College, Cambridge, and one of Her Majesty's
Preachers at Whitehall, The Rectory, Lawford.
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS. 3
Mill, The Rev.W. H., D.D., Regius Professor of Hebrew, Canon
of Ely, and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Moffat, George, Esq., M.P., Eaton Square.
Mure, Col. William, M.P., F.S.A., No. 14, Curzon St., London.
Neeld, Joseph, Esq., M.P., Grittleton House, Wilts.
THE RIGHT REW. THE LORD BISHOP OF OXFORD.
Okes, The Rev. Richard, D.D., Provost of King's College, Cam-
bridge.
THE RIGHT HON. THE EARL OF POWIS. (2 Copies.)
THE RIGHT REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF PETER-
BOROUGH.
Pattison, The Rev. Mark, B.D., Fellow and Tutor of Lincoln
College, Oxford. -
Peile, The Rev. T. W., D.D., Head Master of Repton School,
late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Perkins, Fred., Esq., F.L.S., F.S.A., Chipstead Place, Kent.
Phelps, The Rev. Robert, D.D., Master of Sidney Sussex
College, Cambridge.
Phillipps, Sir Thomas, Bart., M.A., F.R.S., F.S.A., Middle Hill,
Broadway.
Philpott, The Rev. H., D.D., Master of St Catharine's Hall,
Cambridge, Canon of Norwich.
Plumptre, The Rev. F. C., D.D., Master of University College,
Oxford.
Pollock, The Right Hon. Sir F., Knt., M.A., F.R.S., Lord
Chief Baron of the Exchequer.
Powell, F. S., Esq., M.A., Fellow of St John's Coll., Cambridge.
Power, The Rev. Joseph, M.A., Senior Fellow of Clare Hall,
Cambridge, and Librarian of the University.
Pulling, The Rev. James, B.D., Master of Corpus Christi Col-
lege, Cambridge, Vice-Chancellor of the University.
Pusey, Philip, Esq., F.R.S., Pusey, Berks.
Pyper, William, Esq., LL.D., Professor of Humanity in the
University of St Andrew's.
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF RUTLAND, K.G.
THE RIGHT REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF RIPON.
Rawlinson, The Rev. G., M.A., late Fellow of Exeter College,
Oxford.
Rothery, H. C., Esq., M.A., F.L.S., No. 94, Gloucester Terrace,
Hyde Park.
Routh, The Rev. Joseph Martin, D.D., President of Magdalen
College, Oxford.
THE LORD STANLEY, M.P.
THE RIGHT HON. AND REV. THE LORD SAYE AND
SELE, Canon of Hereford.
Schmitz, Leonhard, Esq., LL.D., and Phil. Doct., Rector of
the High School, Edinburgh; late of the University of
Bonn.
Scott, A. J., Esq., M.A., Principal of Owens Coll., Manchester.
Shilleto, The Rev. Richard, M.A., Classical Lecturer of King's
College, Cambridge.
Smith, George, Esq., F.S.A., M.R.S.L., 27, Norfolk Crescent,
Hyde Park.
Symons, The Rev. B. P., D.D., Warden of Wadham College,
Oxford.
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD TENTERDEN.
Tait, The Very Rev. A. C., D.C.L., Dean of Carlisle.
Tatham, The Rev. Ralph, D.D., Master of St John's College,
Cambridge. £,
Thompson, The Rev. W. H., M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Trinity
College, Cambridge. -
Thorp, The Ven. Thomas, B.D., Archdeacon of Bristol, late
Fellow and Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Torlesse, The Rev. C. M., M.A., Stoke by Nayland, Suffolk.
Vaughan, The Rev. C. J., D.D., Head Master of Harrow School,
and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Vaux, W. S. W., Esq., M.A., Home Secretary of the Royal
Society of Literature, St Martin's Place.
Whewell, The Rev. William, D.D., W.P.R.S., Master of Trinity
College, Cambridge, Professor of Moral Philosophy.
Wigram, Loftus T, Esq., M.A., Q.C., M.P., No. 38, Charles St,
Berkeley Square. -
Wilkinson, Sir John Gardner, F.R.S., No. 33, York St., Portman
Square.
Wilkinson, The Rev. W. F., M.A., Ashbourne Road, Derby.
Williams, The Rev. David, D.C.L., Warden of New College,
Oxford, and Prebendary of Winchester.
Willoughby, B. E., Esq., No. 4, Bedford Square.
Wix, The Rev. S., M.A., F.R.S., The Rectory, St Bartholomew
the Less, London.
Wood, The Rev. J. S., M.A., Fellow of St John's College,
Cambridge.
Wright, T. Esq., M.A., F.S.A., Member of the Institute of
France, No. 14, Sydney Street, Brompton.
THE RIGHT HON. AND MOST REV. THE LORD
ARCHIBISHOP OF YORK.
Yate, Joseph Brooks, Esq., F.S.A., West Dingle, near Liver-
pool.
Young, Sir Charles George, Garter King of Arms, F.S.A.,
College of Arms.
THE ROYAL LIBRARY, WINDSOR.
THE LIBRARY OF KING's COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE.
THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, DURHAM.
THE LIBRARY OF KING's CoILEGE, LONDON.
THE LIBRARY OF OWENS COLLEGE, MANCHESTER.
THE LIBRARY OF BALLIOL COLLEGE, OXFORD.
THE LIBRARY OF BRASENOSE COLLEGE, OXFORD.
THE LIBRARY OF NEW COLLEGE, OXFORD.
THE LIBRARY OF ST. JoHN's COLLEGE, OXFORD.
THE LIBRARY OF TRINITY COLLEGE, OXFORD.
THE SCHOOL LIBRARY, RUGBY.
LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS.
F'O H? E IG N' S. U BSC R I B E. R.S.
HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF PRUSSIA, K.G.
His Excellency the Chevalier Bunsen, No. 9, Carlton Terrace, London.
El Señor Don Hilario de Cisneros y Saco, London. (3 Copies.)
El Exº. Señor Don Manuel Cortina, Madrid. (3 Copies.)
Don Domingo de Monte, Madrid.
Hr. F. W. Schneidewin, Professor an der Universität zu Göttingen, Hanover.
THE ROYAL LIBRARY, BERLIN.
LA REAL ACADEMIA DE LA HISTORIA, MADRID.
THE OR A TI O N S
OF
H Y P E R I D E S
FOR,
LY COPHRON AND EUXENIPPUS.

No Tinº
Tº Cfco
2N2 ſº
2 tº
JOY
tººl
Yº! C
yOY
TJ2.
*Y) }
A sº-
&OOC
H.S
-(-
DY
ºs-
sº
y Ni
º
CNº c
f(\xc
Ng H .
'eCX]
Yù OVº
rºl
TC)
y Cº.
& P
CTOONJO C2\ 2 Nº.2
J (O2S2 G1 XCT cºſt
Cºf FO, CNXJTXº X >
Q OCAAX4N C \\2\\ Y
CCN, CTITOYºº-
*IOYOTT NITO) v
O), ſº NJT PO C.
Crſ P2G (2J IN T -10
J XPCOT'ſ TO2 CT
JOY TOY ſtrºrº
TOCTIf OCSXN Tº
JJ ºf JIT ºf I CX) N Ji-
TX CANopºſti Yº
TUDNAOCOlº CO
Ovy fit ºl.2 CCC I NJ }\º
2. p ſº ſº N. SPIN'
yºu tropoſ oit
2 * Nº Cºcº CI.
Tf NJ C'ſ N sºrt N
2\S PTY PJ Oj J C Cº
CTOO2NZºº CIN Cº.,
NJooz Cºx & 9 No.
XJS)2-f XT. O.2 × XJ C P3
z C-1 SXJTUX Pºx º' ºv
TUCFTO) C/SH | CTx) Ge
TT CITICAON ºlx.
2S COCK TOY fºr sojº. T Cſ
CNXCTOY TOYAN2, fxno
Noyo KO) O N T to lº
ºxcºx Q of too cº, Nilº
l
Oxº~ ocCY ºbºiſ”
2 : ſoy 2 cc 1 Nº
2 peºxyrºcºſ ºjºſ"
6-6 N C C T2-C2 JOT fº
I - book, en roºm
X \}]-Toji Pod Tºjº
Joyce Yoſtri º
oſcº, ſº exc
Tſſ N J C C1 c 2 J is 20s
KXJTº TT2 tº
Tft 6 jº Clº ſix CNN
Toxo coſtſ NC (C2
Tr}\l Cºo: Ivº
, , , , C ſº KG-
Nº º
Nyºtº - Tº Xº NU : Co
N. C. r Pº Twº . -- tº
| Q NJ. 2 is . . jº
Có-TUN IT X-Pl, KO NOY
Oeºrg OTCX^PITI JIOC
epºx C.1 ft NJ TY Nº
JTA perex evo.8 Xh Nº
XY-Tºtº Oºtooºº ſix ºf
ºrs, C; 12(\P) T1: to j,\\
\X2S, sº XYJT1?-,
-
(1)
Gºo! I ºf Ol K. 2) 2016
Jie, Tºº Tº
Cºſ IITſ 12S.CIO’,
JIPO CTOYCC
JOYCCX-9 YT.
jT NOON, CNCI J
NYNTIPO CYºo º
OTſ ejecTT sº. 2
XXJ 10 ſ. O AAON ol
K2JT 2.2×NT1? Nº.
To r1 KCN 9 T2
etcarſ tº eſ'
__x CNJ 2- OTſ 2, e-
ecºſt N rejºlor
ºf NJ2J XTUXC1
Ticſ? POYTo
Tony CNThiſ
XXO TI CTO CO (.
JT, CTeº C2 TO
XOſ O J C X-N ºf
Cox NJ&C C Cºlts.
Trojrotºc) }F tº
(xy KO XXONJ K2J7, 70 IT
ſºft Tri N. ×KOXOY ºf
j-to-zerrejoºri ºr ;
JITN rºº ºl
--~~ ºn
~ - - - - - * * *
- - -
Sºoyoºs ºf
He ſo ºf ſtºriº'ſ
THE ORATION
OF
HYPER ID E S F O R. L. Y CO P H R O N.
Col. 1.
- - vºtny
- - Taepo
- 613 ti;
- - Cº. C. U
º - Czlo U
nuev
- - U6 lS
- - - OU
- - 1/Cº. [.
tºº tºº OU W
- - pe
- - 6 (e) S.
º º - 11s
pºg º OU
* gºs pov
6]/OS
tºs tºº t(R) S
- - - V11
- - pes 6t
ſº - UO IOS
- - vºt
zºº º TO
– 6o
tº ºve 'Apt-
Col. 1. l. 16. MS. pø.—l. 23. The MS. perhaps had 6 &vêpes 8tkaoTaí.
Col. 2.
a Tovos 3é divöſod]-
Toča eixev ću Toſis]
épyots' kai Taül Tja aſ ūl-
Tós Juiv ćuapTwſpn]-
orev ćTi Toj čukao'ſ Tn-
ptov, ŠT' mºv to ſtov
d dydºv Trpos ['Apxel-
a Tpatíðnv' Toto Uto]
ydp &ott Tó &pto-Tſov
Tovtovi Tpdywo-
Tos' TpoakaAſeſ]+aſt]
pév Teptidºv 7tſ div}-
Tas divöpaſtrovs,
Töv 6’ 60'ot uév [áv
paſſ 31660-v aſ T6
dpyūptov kpivſet kall
kaTmyopet, 6tſ do ot]
3’ &v é6éAworiv [dro-
Tively dºpino-w, [Tö]
3’ dipyūptov eeoſkTil-
a to Ötöða-w' ék[eſ]-
vos de Aapſ3dva'ſ v]
dvěpáToča dyopa-
Çet kai Tapéxet ào'-
Tep Toſs Ang Taís É-
Two-tº-to-uðv kal 6t-
êoot Towtºp witép
ékdo-Tov Tow dvěpató-
Col. 3.
ôov 630Aóv Tns ſi-
piépas àTws &v h d-
6dvatos orvkopdvtns.
" "Ağtov 3’ &otiv, & dy-
ôpes dukao-Tai, kāket-
6ev čerda at To Tpá-
yua dºp' 6v év [T]6 &n-
pºp Tö Tptorov av-
To evöös iTudoravito:
époi Yap oik[eſ]ot dºré-
a TelAav Ypdºraſvtles
Thu Te eig'ayſ) extav
kal Tós aitías &s év
Th éskAnato iTudorav-
Tö we &Te Tāv eisay-
yeXtſav Č6tôoſo a ju, ev
aſis filv yeypaſupilé-
vov Š.T. Avko Uplºyos
Aéyſet], pdorkoſ v čk Tölv
[o]ik[etov drinkoé]val,
”ajs éyò TapakoWov-
66v, ŠTe X&pittos
éyduet Triu Yvvaika,
TapekeMevöpinv
avºrn Štros un TAm-
oridan Xapitºrq d'A-
Ad StaqvXdget autºv. “
[é]yd) [6]é & kal Tpós Tows
Col. 4.
éturnöetoſus kai
V \ 3. /
Tpós Tows of iketovs]
Toys égavtſov Tóte)
#kov čAey[ov, kal?
vöv Tpos Juſãs élpó.
&T, et éo-Ti T[aúT]a
dAnón duo Moylä,
kai TáAAa. Tävſta Tel-
Tounkéval Tó [év Tm
5 P
eisayyexíg y eypaul-
p e/ \ • 3 3/
Méva: Štt öé [Tojt’ oëk]
éo-Tu, 648tov [vouíčw]
eival & Tao-l [on A60 all.
/ W e/ > \
Tís ydo oi/Tws [éo-ti)
Töv čv Tn TſáAet]
d'Adyto Tos 60'ſ Tis &v]
Tio Teiſa at Toſtoſtols]
Aéryots; dudyſkm yap,
6 ávºpes ourſaatail,
Tpſotov uéu doe-
wkówov kai Tſolon-
ynthv droMov6eſiv
Tô (evºyet Ös hye
\ *
Tnu ‘yvvauka,
Col. 2. l. 12. MS. Treptov. Cf. Hyperid. c. Demosth, fragm. 4.
col. 3. l. 6. (p. 28. Ed. Bab); where Böckh tries to defend the orthography, (Reden des Hyper, p. 14). Sauppe (Oratt. Att. p. 348),
corrects the MS. to Teputóv.—l. 19. MIS. a phow.—l. 20. MS. 6e.... gºtto: so frequently. Col. 3. I. 14. MS. e. KAmoria mTiao'avto.—l. 16.
MS. ev. Cf. Hyperid. c. Demosth, fragm. 15. col. 2. l. 7. vſpuptov. (p. 41. Ed. Bab.).—l. 25. TAngiaon.
rxeovaan apparently—l. 28. MS. .7%.e"kai. Col. 4.1.6. MS. eativ: so generally—l. 7. MS. opox...ot.—l. 10. MS. escºexia.-l. 23. MS.
The MS. is thus corrected from
ro, and myev.–I. 24. The scribe has written some of the following words twice over, and introduced some in their wrong place; the
error is corrected by dots placed over the superfluous words.
Trégºrov.ras adºrnu dkońovdéïv Tó Čečyet Ös fiyev triv Yuvaika, after which follows the text.
Col. 1. l. 28. Aptoſtovos K.T.A..] The obscure history of
these transactions receives no illustration from the remaining
parts of this oration: but Lycurgus seems to have alluded to
them in his speech against Lycophron (ap. Harpocrat. s. v. dv-
ëpatroëtatis) 0avuáço & drydº, et Tows duðpatroëtatds Tów
otkeróv mugs diroo Tepovvtas uóvov, 6avdtºp (nuloſaev. It
appears also from his first oration against Lycophron that
the Athenians évowoºtnoav kai witép &otſ\ov Ypapds i-
haps Dionysius.
The MS. originally had after Yuvaſka, êteſta 3é traičas roLos Trpol
6peos sival. (Athenaeus, Lib. vi. 92. Tom. I. p. 577. Dind.)
Col. 2. l. 2. eixev] The nominative to the verb was per-
See Col. 1. l. 24.
l. 3. autós] Ariston, apparently.
l. 9. To diptorov. This expression has an unnatural
appearance, but it seems to have been the MS. reading:
possibly something has been omitted by the scribe.
Col. 3, I. 27. StapvXáčeil Aºschin. c. Tºmarch. c. 182.

Nyayº et stra e
TIXJ2MX, CTCT, CT! foſtějºv
TICNT2 ºn tº N \NO
JNOYê-CIN) Nº. 32-, oºlſ
TION Nº ſºft yº-TOct 1
Kox OY CCT 2 ×Toxi-
ſº er 22 cºg ArTn59
CTTCTCOC, CTOYTOXJRO
NJO IX Cº (Neº-CN) exoGTº-
2\,XXCX)}\JTC J O CONJoeN
X)\J Öºf CXC JT Cylºny Cyß
A KONOYCO NIJ OON
KX)2.JCA) > ITT JUOYOS2)
(`YUp P29 OYJOYTIPO C.
ſy X ANJACTOY2Y TO Y-
OJJ CONJ ÖN}\f I NJCorºſ
O_\\)/\O TOY_\!\epsi Coo
JOXYPOT2 JOJ & J CJNI-
o, toxogo ºrt,
JO - YJOYCNOTOYC-
KOCC 7-CYCCP2Cſ (2 N
CON!x NCYO.J. J. Joo Yºu
cººl CTN_A ºf TſIA
ſlº, º XTUO2\\0 AJAJ
TO R v Cººl (DC-T-1C
~NJTU) \tº X ºf Oz
XYT2NTUCP ſºft Cºy
TOY 2 Zºº NC
OJ X_\ \xi O
TXJ C't Pit N.
KXN)2TUC
JNCTO NTX
X-Joy ºr
KXJ_XJ kºry.}
C1 J (ONJ et Cº J
COft C 2 CO2,
CŞ CºO) KCTJ ~!
(*) CTCTlf CT1 LAG”
CŞ Y CO 2 C, N'
KOCT(fo)\C U.
CYNJOAXſ. Myº O.
TIPOCG \\ c JTU)
2.JSOYºo Nºt
Ke)\º O_\xej JC
OTUCAS CCXX_*
TOJ CO f KOJ CU, ,
Cºx exºJº K2 NJ.
IYN × NX-ISAJT2-
KCT2.jSºxxJ ºf tr
tº NJ C CO AJ 3.0),
JºJNOC JTIO |ftc|x\}
ºf ſ77 ft COTANJ-
Aſ fºſt PouT&Toc
JNOtoA2 100x NJA pe
N2 CTXJTLoxx xjö eo
º
Ny-e KTOYC1 NJCNTOIC
XJ CoC, NJ DJ KXITIſ Oſo.
Jººpertº
O.U. ex: J-3 PAJ&J O2 KJJY,
_2\ \sory XYTo CCON”
-roy AJCON 2 Pºlº
OTIAN, Roxx00 NTº
XCſ UY.C. exar XJ2 Rey
XONJT & O 2 ºf No
y \ºjo) 2N) soºoº-
T(ONN-N-2JTC) NT(C-
TIf XJ.R_\º CoM 23TOIC
CFTUCI NJCT II XXXJ 6-8-
No Tx eſtcº rºo!
OCAero Ticſ A2 NJTUTOT-
for Noroº Rºcº
OYAAONJONJ XCXOYCIN
20 TOIX Nº. 12-TUCP ITOY
TTP2 ſix y > J O CONCTOY
C] NJ 29 NXJ CYNJ CKCY
Ac2 NJI cool.2 of lº-S
fººl CKXJ XJ Cºrº-1
fºr No Asºº N C-3 J
-j-2 cºſt tºxſº
i XC too.TecY__XR2-J
Nyédºro CZNYOJ NJ
e-reporjff'ſ LCP J Tºº
tºo cº-ºoºº
THE ORATION OF
Col. 5.
ëTſe]tta 8è
Taibas Toys TpoTéu-
Tovt as avTiju dico-
Nov6eiv kai Autóšit-
Tov Kal yóp oùTos ſi-
koxoſtel dud. To xà-
pav čkötöoo 6al authv'
eit' éyò eis Towto dro-
votas fix60 v ča-Te
&\\tov Te Toa'oùTov
dvěpátov avy-
akoxov6oſvtov
kai AtwäTTov Kal
Evºgatov Tow Tpoor-
yvuvao-Tov avToi),
HYPERIDES FOR LYCOPHRON.
Col. 6.
Toº děexpſms dicotſ]ov
vekTowo-lv čv Tots
oia ué of 5tot aitt lov- dyógiv oi katiyopot
Tat eipnk[éval ; 3p' ovlk Töv pewyðvtov:
&v dréſkTelve Töv
Aéyovta ; [To be keſplé- 8vvov avToſs eival
5 \ e= > v / \ 5 * e /
Aatov, dºrſ Ó Töv d'Aiyov | Töv dyöva 6&otos
kai utkpóſ v Towtov tº ju 3 Ti &v 8oiſºtovtat
eitrov eis [Towto divlat- Aéyoval kai kata-ketº-
orðmortas 6 X[dplºttlos
(ajs éoucev) [fiX0e]v
e/ f W
ão Te Tpótſepov gév
(ajs pagiv) [ths yuvjat-
\ / e/
KOS Tpoxeyoſ ſons] OT!
êovtat, oi 66 kpué-
Mévot oud Töv på8ov
ToMA& kal Tów Tre-
Tpayuévov avTols
eitely €TiNav04-
avvopouoſkvia et In vovtat: ŠTeuta oi
Tpos éué, Tóſ Alv 6]é gév ćTetêdv Tpété-
oi Töv ‘EXAmvwy
e /
duo Mo'youpévals
icºxvpdtatoi eta-ty,
J 3. P
ov[k] joxvvówny
Toſtolºtovs Adyovs
Aéyov Tepi Yuval-
V 5
kós éAév6épas Trav-
tov dicovávtov,
ſovo'] éðeófew um Ta-
|paxplmud droxtoual
2 * /
| data y áuevos ; Tís
V 3\ 3 /
\ [ºydp &v rivéoxeto
| ToljaúTa Tepi Tàs at-
dkovov ćué [Tapa]
Kexevögevoſv auth]
ôtos éup vn év]
Tols dokous oils duo-
o'ev čAduðave [Triv
yvvaika. kal Taüſ Ta 30-
ket &v juïv "Heſtov]
ékeſvos d waivſö-
Mevos Totna at [6]
MapyiTns 6 Távtſov
d6extepdºtatos; "| ['AA]-
A’ oiwat, 6 &vöpeſs oil-
W *
kao-Tai, ToàAd TAeo-
orð
Col. 5. l. 7. MS. eyðiðoval-l. 19. MS. maxvvopºny. Col. 6. l. 2. MS. [akov]o; ; so frequently.—l. 3. MS. ... [k. See above Col. 3.
l. 16. and Col. 28. l. 24. Col. 7. I. 4. MS. ônev.–l. 14. MS. eTeutal.-l. 20. MS. ax\al ovvokevlagavtes.
p. 26. Reiske.
kai Tºv Niktav oi kaxós diaſpºdéagav uéxpt ydaov.
Col. 4. l. 20. Ópeakówov] a muleteer. Lobeck (on Phryn.
evpd)v Tºv čavtov 60)atépa Stepôappévny
p. 696.) prefers ðpeoköuos to opewkóaos, as the more Attic
form; but some of the Grammarians distinguish the words:
Suidas: 6peokówos, 6 Too ëpovs ëtiusXojuevos' opewkówos
8é, 6 &tueXmTris Tóv mutóvov.
l. 21. Toonym Tºvl Hesychius and Eustathius: Tponym-
Tris, o Too Çetryovs Tponyoſuévos év Tols yºuous. It is
very probable that this passage of Hyperides was the place
which they had in view. I have not been able to meet with
any other place in which the word is similarly used.
Col. 5. l. 4. Auššuttov] He appears to have been the
brother of the woman. See Col. 6. l. l. This whole passage
is interesting as being a locus classicus for our information
respecting Athenian marriage processions. Lycurgus appears
to have compared the insult offered to Charippus by Lyco-
phron, to that which Hipparchus son of Peisistratus offered
to Harmodius, when he forbad the sister of the latter to
walk as Kavnºpópos in the Panathenaic procession: at least
we know from Harpocration, that he introduced Hipparchus
and the word kaumbópos into his oration against Lycophron.
Col. 7.
e \ \ W V 3 /
oi uév yöp oud Tó driv-
* /
pov \dyov Adówo-w
5 / &\ 2/
ov plovov a eXovorty
5 V S / * arº,
awtoi Öikata Tepi Tow
/ /
Tpayua Tos Aéyov-
V
oruv d'AAd orvo-key-
A
doſavtes \otöopias
gº. \ z-
Alzévêeſs kata Tów
/ 5
kptuouévov čát-
o-T&oſt Tris d7to Ao-
/ e/ /
yías, do Te o vu(3at-
vely avToſs 6volv
V eſ 5\ *
Tó Tepov ji Tepi Tôv
3/ zº-
étoffev 6ta}oXóv
l. 14. Toogyvavao Toºl This word does not occur (so far
as I know) in the Lexicons: the sense seems to be the same
as that of yuavao Tſs.
Col. 6. l. 14, avvopouokvia] From the fact that Ly-
curgus in his orations against Lycophron employs the words
iTwós and dpkdvn, Sauppe ingeniously remarks, “illam a
Lycophrone videri raptam et in domo aliqua privata retentanº
et stupratam esse.” If the present passage is rightly restored,
the meeting will rather have occurred by appointment.
l, 22. "Hoov] I can find out nothing about this man:
yet, if the MS. contained a proper name (as seems most pro-
bable), it can hardly have been any other than Heron.
Col. 8. l. 3. d:troXéXma 6ail This very rare verb occurs
in Dionys. Hal. Lib. Iv. c. 44. Töv iółov direAav0&vov to
dAyetvöv. Schäfer on Longus (Past. p. 77), observes: “Olim
[pro & TeX&06to legebatur] direxé0eto, quod non erat cur
Willoisonus tanto supercilio contemneret. Parum tamen aliis
in locis huic composito fortuna favit ... Cum ék\av6dvou at
dicatur, cur non et dToMav6&vowat dici possit **
l. 7, of nual If this be the MS. reading, the present
passage appears to be the most ancient authority for the use
of the word. It occurs however frequently in Plutarch, and
XJ C \º
JTCC
TOC
XC X.
_XXNJr.'
| [POS
job)\! C
Xrſ TC4
2JNXS)
cCTION
Juf O Clºs
Jex-Xe
O-CT) JT
JUpozºl 2 K.
bºro, ſo
NJOY If tº
2\\? CIT
ONJ K2O a
enjºx Cl
(*NJJT1 Nº
2S2 TUC.”
c) TCON &
ºf CONYTU"
CYN 2 JUO),
Dºck) tº 2-
X x_j (NJUV)
TCOT ºf OY,
Ux ºr : Y to
-T (f \J.XX2-
CXT! O
J-ſº
JOON
') J Q) \"
, , . ; Of I
rt Ayº-
Tolcºo Yº
Q?o-j-f
ſſ Orci
OYvº, ſº
Ox_\º-
* Tl2OS)
OJ
Orrocſ
CT TO | C S P J NJO MUXC-
NJO) Cº-OYCO) K CI OYC
KXJ FCY cº Xoyo Ro
f O Gº NJ -f-t e CTI NJ ſix-
TCUN, CNJT1 ITIONC]
To YTUV) N.2 JTA COT1 No
TCP ONJ JOYJOYC2SY
NJ 2-\\CNJOY Cºl JT tº NJ
J O I CX-2\\ONJ XJ C J C Jor
TIOONJ J Coju Kl NJ2X, Nichº
OY cuſ of to c1 NJ cºxe-
OY- O NJO NJ TI CP IJöON
Cºn jºlſ Oroy NJ JOYONO
JO , CT(eJ (Oljit Cºl. XX.
XXK2JJ) ( NJ XJ (OXO
ſt XJSJ J It NexxJ (NJ2\ls
T2 J J C. CFSXJTUXP Xſº
ſ tº NCI C J C'ſ C2S Kö C, 2 Jº
T(tºp loo NJ2XCI X-TOYC
XJKOY C. NJ Koºeye, NJ
JJJ XJUOX30 T-1 COX) ×
K. J J UCF'ſ co NJ Lex Jº
Xrſ tº KXITOYTo
JUCAS CKXXAxocºſ x.
ce-o ºr O'Toowº Uſoſ
DN OYJJ DN3 NXTF1, OP12 N
TI C J 1 (CACO) T \to C)
-
Avo tº 2\ºx CX\\\! t ſº
Aykº) 2. Nº NJT toº
TXT! Nyxxon C ºxº
Nººr, J recox) \ey
TT INXJ (OAO | 12 N Nº.
Gººd N ºr tº fit
tº ºx! ſºlo-NJ NNYC)’s
Jon J2 J (Jº ONJ lºº Kºs
DS "TXJ OYC NJOXJSOYC
X* XY) (CPJT HAH
(` XJNJTXCTOY Cº.
J Y Cej KXII toºl
X: Soº YT CF
Q \50N pººr, Urocyoyo
O Gº. * CTX CCRJoo J
No. * I CI Nº | N)}\
JI’’ Jºn JXN INJ
2\ |J to ºf CX-
ºf O, *I ( ſº ».
Çly v2.J. vº
ſº *J C ºf CAſ
I tº UCP) JYTN
JC" J.T. & J
OTf) Y
3-5 A *.
ſ^3 Tøv.
| H ' 2NC
_2^3 C. *C.

THE ORATION OF HYPERIDES FOR LYCOPHRON. 3
Col. 8.
dro Aoyov]uévous
The [Tep? Tow] Tpdyna-
Tos dToxoytals dro-
AeAſ notat, i) eilum pié-
pivnſ VTai Tepl] Tów
7pokſ atmyopmblév-
Tov oſing a kata-
Aetteſ w Tapid Toís
ôukao Tſais & Tij GAnón
éa-Ti +[d eip]nuéva:
Tpós 6 & Tolſtots Toſs
Te ué[AAovta is 80n-
6eiv Tripos Tojvºroval
Tpoètaff d\\|ovoſt ka?
avrov Toº [kow]oué-
vov Tiju [droN]oytav
ôtao Toſépovo-w]. oi-
ov kal aſ UTós] owtool
évéxel [kat' épio'ſ
év Tſi ka[Tnyoptg] - -
6' d'Tox- - - -
oru Töv a - - -
Töy wºreſ vavtſov
ovva Tox o'yovuel-
vov čt - - - -
pum dro - - -
TóTep' ovſk Čše]-
Col. 9.
* - /
o Tu Tous kptuoué-
V /
vous Tow's oiketovs
V V /
kai Toys ºptAovs 30-
e- 5\ 3/
m6eiv, ) éo-Tu Tu.
* 5 * f
Töv čv Tn TóNet
f f
Towtov čnuo'Tukó-
* V
Tepov Tou Toys ov-
P *
vapiévous eitely
* 5 p *
Toſs dévvd Tous Töv
* /
Toxttſov kuvèvvetſ-
º W \
ovari 3on6eiv; ori) 36
/ zºº
ow uávov Tepi Tôv
p W /
Gºvvmyopov Tovs Aé-
/ 5
yovs 7teTotno-au, d\-
\ \ \
Ad kai Tºv dºtoxo-
f V > V
'ytav Triv ćuñv 8ta-
/
Tattels kai Tapay-
p gº, *
yéAAets Toſs ŠukaoTaís
\ ~ * 3. V
Tepi 6v čeſ avToys
5 A /
dkovety keVeyetv
ple diºroño'yeſoróat,
\ y = \ 3 ~
kal Tept ov pam égv
f V *
Aéyétv' kai Tojto
a- e. 3/
7tós Kaxtos éxel
\ V e/ 5 - /
oré Mév čTws iſłowº-
V
Aov Thy Katmyopiav
Touma ao 6al, Tpoet-
Col. 10.
367a, 88 & #x0 éyò
ôtkata Aéyetv Tpós
Td Tapd goû éWrevolue-
va. Üpapeto-flat pov
Tnu droxoytay; kal
éué učv aittà év Tn
eio'ayyextſ, kataAvetv
V * /
Töv čnuov Tapagat-
v[ov]Ta Toijs vöuous,
a'ſ Tos] 3’ UTeptnon-
/ V
aſ as Tlávtas Toys
"[duous eio'ayyext-
aſ v 866]okas VTép
tºv [ypa]ºpal Tpós Toys
6eaſuolºétas €k Tów
/ 5 W e/
vöſuav eiglu, ºva.
* \ 5 /
Tpſøtov] uév driv-
ëſvvos eio-lins eis
Tôſv dyóval, éteſt]ra
&Tuns Tpaylºpóias
Ypſ dºpov Tiju eio'ay-
/ e/ *
yeaſtav &o tep vöv
yéºpſ apas, kall aittà
&T, TI aſtny Tàu y]v-
vaſika] - - - - -
yapſov čvdov Kalra.
ympſ &o keuv} - - as
êe - - - - - - s
Col. 9. i. 22. MS. ear. Col. 10. I. I. MS. exo-l. 6. MS. ºn-l. 20. Ms...obias.
See Wyttenbach on Plu-
in the speech against Lycophron: 367 (pixois kai Tois oticelots
8on.6eiv čxpt toº an étuopkeiv. (Floril. xxvii. 10.)
Col. 10. l. 5. ca. Šué učv K.T.A..] The passage of Ly-
curgus to which Hyperides may be supposed to allude, is
preserved by Suidas s. v. wox9mpta.
Katd Avköppovos'
Avkovpyos év Tó
ow ydp ôotov Tots yetypauwévous
vöuovs, & 6v ) êmuokpatia a 6% stat, Tapaſaivovta, été-
pov će wox9mpóv čányntºv č6óv kai vowoffétny yewówevov
dTuđpntov dºpeival.
l, 10. awºrós & VTepTměřía as K.T.X.] Pollux referring to
this passage writes thus (Lib. VIII, § 52): 6tt & 3 storay-
yetNas kai oix éAdv dºmaios fiv YTeptºns év Tó witép
Avkóppověs pnow. It is manifest that Lycurgus is charged
with having chosen to prosecute Lycophron in an eiday-
yeXta rather than in a ypap), in consequence of the security
of taking such a course. Hyperides, in another fragment of
this oration preserved by Pollux, enumerates some of the
legitimate subjects of an eigayyexia (Lib. Ix, ) 156): )
vewptww Tpodogtav 7) dpxetov éptuploadv % KatóAnytv
&kpas : a passage which finds a perfect parallel in his Ora-
(Col. 23. of Mr Arden’s MS.)
tion for Euxenippus.
Suidas, Tpaypéta Šetvord Beta.
is found in other late writers.
tarch de Rect. Aud. Rat, p. 39. D., who observes ‘olmaa et
otmats est falsa Scientiae opinio.”
I. 27. Tórep' oºk £eart K.T.A..] With this part of the
Oration are to be compared Fragments 9 and 13 of Mr
Harris's papyrus. See Appendix to Hyperid. c. Demosth. (pp.
73–76. Ed. Bab.), more particularly the following portions
of them, which should probably be read as follows ... Tº
ſcatnyopt? Xprio Bat, oùTo kai égé dare êv TpóTov Tpoff-
pm wat kai as āv ºvoual dToMo'ysio 6at, kai undeis juſov
datavtåro wot ustašū Aéryovt. “Tº Tov6 muſiv Aérysis ;"
Fragm. 9....véaos' ow8é kaAdv ydp et uév Tó 3ov\ouévº
kata Tów ëticagouévov (or Kptuouévov) éčovoſtav Štěoat, avy-
atroXoyela 6at 36 køAſſet Fragm. 13 ; where I have now
replaced ; by Tí in the former Fragment, and dToMo'ysia.0at
by avvatroXoyela 6at in the latter, agreeably to M. Sauppe's
text in both cases. He reads the latter passage (which is
much mutilated), thus: 3 vöuos avºykat.nyopeiv učv Tó
£3ovXouévg Katd Tów ºptvouévov éčovoſtav ðiðwai, OTU 1/{\.7TO-
Xoyela 6a, 66 kaºvel. These restorations make excellent
sense, but the MS. has ...petuev most distinctly written. A
passage of Lycurgus is preserved by Stobaeus, who does not
specify the Oration, which may very possibly have occurred
l. 20. Tpaypºtas]
f 3. y * 9 W
'Apia Topávns TIAoûtº,-laws 'Epwiſs éo Tuv čk Tpaypôtas.

OY IT fo Cºtt KCITIX?X.
TOYUNOXXOYC OYNSYº'
AJN)\}{N},\ \e NJON 2\º-
CŞOJ } NTOO NJCNJTTTTTo
Nù IX N × NXexei S
C T( CJ j\) sºn sees
TOYTSN XJTi OCújºy
T(CPIT (CF CNY N. T. N.
KXJ1 Iſ Of 12 NT ej (oſ)]
C2) TCOTú?& JOYTſoo
ºf (NCINCN NOJ Kel Ney-
2\ºok ºf UN) XXf ITT
JUCA) CNJ ITU) NTUC, NJ
JCONJ (XN CeſAOTONJøj
2\ON SXTXſji PA jºc) is
f(tº OY Cº. Yezºo of).
JºJJ or 2 r ſix flo)
JUſ Q Cocººr TO Cºnſ
ex-prºox 2NTUNONJ
OT OYZNôJ (ONJ—itſ |\N
2\}\}, X_2\\CT (*1 KKT 2, NJ
To ſº. OYNºye
CT NJ 2JN)2S Pecºs Navy?
FS2.0 Xeſúſ NOTf) NRoy
NJ Tº K2. Rºxxº~.
2N-coºl ºxº-C2SO | Sºx)
2\ºf NOYNºSTOON-2.
To Y KNITT TO roy2-18s
Roxorºuter exºcy
2 Nºzcº ºxº
TOCTOYR OYONIR CR
OSNX C-5 tº TXC2ONJTNº
\\CC, NJ ºf TOTTON tood
TU'éJUNCTU Pond OY Kerºl
OYTC JTCONJ Jºl f ONJON
JX-OY2\CNXTUVyNºdºſſ;
TC02 Sº O'YTeCTie Kn
X\}\OT 3-? ºft)\Yevoo
XPONJ O'Cº-P J YU Cºrtin
*Nº Tºo! JOYTPOTTOY
SPI Keº Tºroe 299 wo
&T Sºl'ſ lepy roºros-
*N2 J J Gorºol:ºxyTH
'N OC 2 ºxenuſ NP
! Nº, NITJJYJ Conſ
Juxºriſ' tourisp
YXN ºf QSTIOY >
Yen – J & KJ-12
TX X X ºn J2\{ |
*N XT[&TOYTOY
\X2NTO COYXNJ
JXerºn)
XC 2-1 & JTo
NJI XC Tºº
2 X)\jſ) TX
tº CeCT) N
O&C LXXJ OOC) NJOY FOl
FHenzº Tit NJ XJ) to N
e) NOC CINXJ C foy]o
NYºjº speex Kº
C XJJAeo Y \\\) N. A 2--
TPet Rob Nye NJJrt I toº
TONJ.2J (xj Ji XXPON ox!
of CAI to NJJſon tº
OY2\tº \\} XJNTUCAUTIOJe-
XXR& NJ O'YTC JNJ KXJ-1
JJ X \\OT POCOY^*NA
TCUN JIC), ITUON TC10
Nye NJ OY2\e TI cºperts
OY2\º TCPONJACN exº~A.
| Tºrrojº \
- q>]^
re-rexerºr zº
O XCX) CJONJ XT[2]NJT X. j”
NJ CNJTT 2 PX2NY-NJX3.x. NJ
K2 JYTCC'ſ J TI NJOYCIAN
TT (NJCAXXYTOY ecºſe-
XJN) CJ, MJXJAYTIOTU-
NJ JJ (I (Coºs Il XN
JOONJXNAP2'ſ 2012-)-
CNJ CN2K XJYT(OTrong
CYNJ XJ2XO NJ J Gojºſ Nº. 2
Cºx CJºſ \pi\eo), JSJ 7
*fe cºlºrë. Infº"
THE ORATION OF
Col. ll.
p V
ow 7poornkel Tapd
\ p *
Tous vónovs. ovikoúv
/ \ >
&AAny piév ovde-
* zºº p
pitav Tóv év Tn Tó-
* /
Aet yuvaika Éxels
gº. t/ V
eitely #Tuvi éyò
y 3. /
Toſtov attids eipit,
\ ^ \ * V
Tepi is 3& vöv Tāv
f y
kaTmyopuav TreToum-
/ /
oral, TóTepa šov Tpoor-
Z * 5
nkel v O'vyoukely €K-
y y
êeêopuévny Xapit-
\ *
Tºp evi Töv Toxt-
* 5\ 5 / 3/
Töv iſ divéköotov čv-
/
ôov Kataympdarketv,
<\ 5 /
# ev60s éâeddón,
/ 3. /
TáAavTov dipyvptov
P es
Tpoorffévros auth
5 p *
Evºbriuov, on Aov
e/ 5 \ /
&T ov, Šud Tovmptav
V 5 /
dAAd 6t' étuetkeway;
P V º f :
T Towtºp piév oëv Šće-
'5' 9/ w
o-Tuv, & divöpes dukaoTal,
f / 3\
kal Aéyéuv č Ti &v (3ow-
w
Antal kai katayev-
e - 3. 3.
êeo-6al, Juás 6' oiual
êeiv ovſk Čk Töv
e- f
Tow Katnydpov 6ta-
HYPERIDES FOR
Col. 12.
* \ 3. ems
{30}\óv Tepi épov
êukdćeuv, dAN' éº & Tay-
Tos Tod (3tov Šv 3e3t-
wka četda'avtas'
es V V *
Aaffeiv yap To TAñ60s
Tô juétepov oijk vi
oùTe Townpöv čv-
Ta ovééva Töv čv Tn
/ 3/ 3. *
7tóAel oi!"Te éTielki),
d'AA' 6 Tapexn}\v66s
xpóvos udotus éo Tiv
ékdo tº Too TpóTov
dkpt{3éo Taros &AAws
\ \ W /
re 6m kai Tepi Toſtov
[T]6v aitutov oia aú7m
[éortly 60 a uév y&p
|T6), döuknuditov
3. t / es e /
[év] dºrdon Tº fiXukíg
[T]oj div6067Tov
|évêéxetal döukn-
|a'al, Taülta pièv čeſ
[a.koTeïv diſ' autoſ, Toº
| dāwī]uatos oj čv
y
| xn Tus' uojixelſew
[3. ovſk évôé|xétat dTö
[Tevitſiko]vta étáv
| dpåduevov), dAA’ # Tai-
[\al uot Tológeo-Tu,
LYCOPHRON. 4
Col. 13.
<\ f º
6 beiðd two-av owtow,
3. * \ /
# Nzévôn Triv aittav
\ 3. V /
eikos eival. Éyd) Tot-
‘S 3/
wvv, & divöpes duka-
V 3. & *
o-Tai, Me6 Judov 6ta-
/ 5 * y
Tpí8tov čv Tn Tóxel
t/ P
Töv &Travta Xpévov
3/ V
oùte aittav Tovmpdv
5 / / > 3/
ow8euía y Tú7ſot' -
3F 3/
Aa3ov oit' éºyk)\n-
\ 5 N /
Aud plot Tpós ovééva
* * y
Töv Toxtºrtov yeyo-
5 N \ y
vev ovéé Tépévya
/ >
Čikmu ovéeputav
5 e/
ové à Tepov čeotaxa,
e ass y
iTTotpopów êe Öua-
/ /
TetéAeka pixotſt]-
\ / p
Mºos Töv čí7tavta xpd-
> /
vov Tapd ovvapuv
V e \ V 5 /
kal v7rep Tnv ovartav
\ * S
Tiju èuovtov' éo-Te-
/ 3. & /
ºpóvouat 6' UTó Te
sº / P
Töv iTTéay Tâv-
Tov divöpaya.6tas
/ \ *
ëveka kal wºrö Tóv
p
orvvapx6v Tov, U-
*. / 6. /
pºets Yap Me, 6 &v-
ôpes oucao Tai, Tp(6-
8
Col. II. I. 5. MS. Arvi-I. 8. Ms. ye, a stroke being drawn through the y-l. 10. MS. wov.—l. 11. MS. sylèeêopievnv, and
(O Śo.
below aveyāotov–l. 21. MS. eTeikeiav.–l. 23. MS. avópes. Col. 12. l. 2. MS. ekºtavros, the k being struck out.—l. 9. MS. strelknº-
1. 14. MS. Tovtó.—l. 18. MS. rammara. Col. 13. l. 5. MS. Saltpegov.—l. 8. MS. ore-l. 9. MS. exagº, and evKAnna-
l. 17. quxotipºws, the MS. has been so corrected from Toâvripos.
Demosthenes uses the verb as Hyperides (here and at Col. 37)
does the substantive; De Coron. p. 229 : ép ois dºugojvrá we
eópa Tºv TóAw oùat ye TſAtkoúTols iAira vöv čTpayóðel
kai &ieśāst K.T.A. De Fals. Leg. p. 400: Taota Tpaypºet
reputºv. In later writers this use of Tpayºta is not very
uncommon; Polyb. Lib. VI. c. 56. II: Tois dºxois (p630s
kai Tà rotatºrm Tpay®tº td TAñón avvéxetv. Diod. Sie.
Lib. xix, c. 8: dºp' 6v muiv Teptaipétéov éo Ti Tºv čTiëstov
kai avvæðn Tois avy'ypapeño Tpayſočíav.
Col. 11.1. 8. Tepi is 86 vov K.T.A..] The scope of this
passage would have been more apparent, if the preceding
sentence had been preserved entire. The sense appears to
be as follows: “Ought she not to have married a respect-
able citizen (like Charippus), as soon as an opportunity oc-
curred ? and such an one did immediately occur, after she
had received a suitable portion from Euphemus, who clearly
acted from kindness to her, not from any collusion with me.”
Euphemus, we may suppose, was accused by Lycurgus of
being a mere cover for Lycophron, in order to enable him to
accomplish his purposes. An uncertain fragment of Lycur-
gus may be referred with some probability to the oration
against Lycophron, as Meier and Sauppe had already sus-
Av-
Koſpyov' "Otav yuvii duovoias Tās Tpos évépa grep",0ñ
d;3totos o kata\ettóuevos yivetal (3tos. (Stob. Floril. 68,
35).
mutilated Fragment (17) of Mr Harris's papyrus, which ap-
In Col. 3. of
that fragment, we have Töv Eignuov... kºvae. In Col. 2.
pected, and to the circumstances above adverted to.
The name Euphemus occurs again in an obscure and
pears to be a portion of the present oration.
M. Böckh reads Tov čºyºyvtåTo yévovs diráyety (eſpºyety
Sauppe) Töv Etºpnuov, dAN' éâv: the appearance of the MS.
itself is very favorable to M. Böckh's readings, more so than
to M. Sauppe's, or to my own (p. 77). What follows in the
column is perfect: vöv 86 Touro Toujo avres épyo uéuapTv-
pñkaow aúTol a's \revöſs éattv m attia kar' éuov. Tpós Śē
Toitous Tós ovk & Totov, et uév Tt &rage Tö Tatētov # Tytſy-
vówevov i kai Watepov taſtals Tais 8tathikats toxvpišegbai,
év ais J... Although it is not easy to connect this passage
with Mr Arden's papyrus, I am inclined to think that it
belongs to the same oration of Hyperides, not only because
-ſoº yº" º XON
Terrºeſ, NJ tººloº
J > p;x\, N KX) fitz)
Juic-NJ XYTO ºf ºx{Th.
Toynſ ſucyſiod Tlºſ
Xft Roſco Jº OC
ºnfocºcº
XY ſo OTT NTPITONº
NJ) XYTON] Oyºoyo so
J. Nº oc II ºf Tººl
ºf 2 ºf 1. Rejºnis
Cö ONJTO, CITITT Cºrºl?"
XJ topodox 2\rºi º
NJOYC KX) ºſ IOYToo!
JUNOToo!XroNool & N
KXJTJJ X_A_ACNJOYº Giº
Tº NJCRCJCTNCTSXº-
ce, Joytelzºw-orrºn
ºxo~2-oxº crº
NJO JCX-TPJ Cirº Cºciº-
2JJoo Cºttrº YICOſoy
oyroºrºº
( 20 Nº CT ºr ol Qº
^: /TOYêrº XXYr PINſ)
2, , f TC-j< x_JT PI AYºu ſº
Ö Vºic TOYTONGTON
s
23 cox) >Cocºcº º
KN Cº [124 C-US
on-ºpolo NJTºrc N2-
tº Nutt cit toºlfi Poºl
e-rººftºvo X ºf UCIOº
e1}\} \! OYºrºſ Cºº
joyorro loºr-º-
ſtocrºereeseicº
Tºrº toº
No. 2 roToxºivº
YººTº”Cº NJ XYTºº!
Öcºver Jo Yº tº ſº
exon Cox)\}^ſº cº-
KX CTX, YT (ºf ºx-xx-Y
TOY CIT CIN CX-2 or
2) Jºft SOXJ C Cº'ſ, 2NT
2\cos 2\IT Oſ COYNX
7 (CI Peoccyxo~NTOY
2\errº Cºoºoº.
TwoMº. cy ſoon.JLZº-
Cºx erºeſ crºftſ U
foxºſovº
XºrºrtNXTorºnto
XITO)Nº Kºº A&To
_\xi}\! YJO , sorº Kºjić ſoo!
KXJ 3. Nº Ti Roxod Ke-
Jº CX Sºxº~ 3 J
JOYCCYTN ºf OYNTA®7
( 5.)
e-colºrTtoº?-T-f-1}\} Ko Y
JOYNTCONJOC NºSox
cººl enºuo 1 tº opcºtt tº
voyexert Cox Ol KC)
Gorºfft TCADNJSPINº NJ
& O fit Ojº to 2 J TION_1 TTT)
JUNCNJONJT tº XCTCroo!
|Alcº TTT 12, CNA oxNCJ
Cybo-OT) 2 ºf CTNJ XJ Co
50 Lºoved Jºetsº
KJNX, Nºroº T' OC*
Axon'ſſic floº & O Y
exNY1CTO Nº. 3 PIOTO
e CŞſt NJTO) coſ & Cº
P-129 x > Nº. CJ C & NXY
ſt CPT on cºop cºlº
K2-12) to O S J ONJJ &
ANſ (2\º-e NJT'ſ try (2JJ'ſ
2. rºsproux G2 JNJOY)\!
KC/\e YI: JCºN2 rºº
2\! Nº CT & J NXXUS 11N&
KO)-(e) to ON. N. ×N)2
£f-totºx Oſo Coºp Dº
jº, CYN CTI lºo'ſ I CXaº
/*exeroy C. No.2) rº
= OT2 J
* 2: toxon: Ynºr
* - - M-
2-YNº. *ONo.9 -

THE ORATION
Col. 14.
W
row uèv piſãapxov
/ /
€xelpotovnorate, é-
Teuta, eis Anuvov
itrapyov, kal fipša
V 3 W 31ſ’ 3/
Mév avºróði Öiſ' étm
Töv Troſtroff iTTap-
/ /
XnkoTov Movos,
V
TpoorkaTéuelva èé
3. / V p y
awtó0, Tóv Tpitov ć-
/
viavtów of 3ovXó-
/ 3/
Auevos froxitas &v-
ëpas €7 kepaññv
*
eio-Todºttetv Töv put-
orðoy Toſs iTTeja-ty
> p
drópos 6taketué-
/
vovs’ Kai év Towſtºp
* / /
Mou Tô Xpóvºp Éy-
\ 3. V
kAnug uév ovdels
Töv čkeſ évékd'Aé-
3/ 3 N / 3/
orév oite ióíg oite on-
/ . 3. /
pooríg ovoels, a Teqjd-
\ 5
vows 3& Tpto-iv ča-Te-
P e V *
‘pavajënv Jiró Tow
/ *
8ſhujov Tow év ‘Hºpal-
/ V e /
g|Tí |& kai étépous
c * 5 e /
iſ to Tov čv Mv56tvn,
<\ V / t *
& [6]n Tékumpua juiv
€ſortly eis Tourov Tów
Col. 15.
dyóva dis kevöeſs
* 3. p
kat' époi airtat eio'ív:
3. A * / \ 3.
5 yap oióv Te Töv 'A-
y \
6ñvnot trovnpov
3. A A - V
ev ſympava, Xpno-Tov
éival, ovo’ Jueſs dis
* /
Totogrov Čvºra pue d-
/ es
Tea-TéAXe're ékelore
/
Trapakaratuffépé-
f *
vot ovo TöAets Tów
/ 2 *
Juétépov avtſov.
e/ \ º
T“Oora uév oëv éºyd,
*3, º 3/
etxou, 6 &vöpes 6t-
\ \
kao-Tai, UTrép épuav-
* 2- V
Tow eitreºv orxe66v
> / \
a kºkoo:Te” &Tſet]3)
V * P 3. $
8é & katſiyopſois OUR. C.-
3/ *
Tetows exov Tov
/ \ \
Aéyetv eioflags 36
/
troXXdkus dyovíče-
3. / /
orðat ékdAet ovvnyd-
V
povs Tovs orvva 7"oA-
oùvTaºs Tuva Töv tro-
* y /
Attöv doikos, 3éo-
* V \
plat Üutov Kai éºyd)
kai dvºri!30Å6 ke-
arº W Z
Xevo at Kaipuš ka?\éoral
Toys avvepowvtas
OF HYPERIDES FOR LYCOPHRON.
Col. 16.
3. V & \ p
épioi UTrép Tnxikov-
Tov dyövos kai drov-
e e amº y y
oral evvoikós, et Tís
3. * 5 f
plot àxel Töv oikei-
\ zºº. P
wv # Töv pi\ov
* /
{3onóñorat Toxtºrn
V 9/ e Z
Mév ovt, vpietépg
5 / \ V 5 2
iðuárn 8é kal owk ei-
W / 3.
o66tt Aéyeuv dyw-
/ W W
višouévº 66 kal
p
kivövvetſov'rt ow
/ \ /
Móvov trepi 6avóTov,
2 p \ * P
(éAdxto-Tov y&p Touré
éo-ti Tois dp06s Ao-
/
yugoplávols,) dAA’ J-
V amºs 3. *
Tép Tov Čšopto-0mvat
kai droflavóvºra
\ 3 zºº. p
pande év Tn Tatºpt-
* 3 V 3.
ël Taq.mvat. Śāv oëv
/ '3' 3/
ke?\evnte, 6 &vöpes
êukaoTal, KaNg Tuvé
P 3. y
£30möiforov Ta. divd:-
/ y
£3m0t plot, €eóptAe,
\ V &/ 3/
kat O'vvette o Tu exeus'
keNetſova w of Öuka-
a Taí.
ATIOAOTIA YIIEP
AYKOqbPONOX.
Col. 14. 1. 17. MS. evkAnua. Col. 15. 1. 22. MS. awaroºra-l. 25. MS. eytot, and below avºri!3oxwt. Col. 16. l. 4. MS. wo-
}, 12. MS, ao, Tept.
Euphemus is mentioned in both, but also because a clause
cited by Pollux from the oration of Hyperides for Lycophron
seems to refer to the same subject: ošte 'yap Tºv Šavroſ,
xeipa (= xeipóypapou) ºvatov dpvija aabat. (Lib. II. § 152).
Col. 12, l. 24. goixsſetvl A most certain restoration,
though this is the only place in the papyrus which distinctly
mentions the main charge. Theon (Progymnast. 2, 7, p. 162,
Walz) alludes (for the sake of noticing a rhetorical figure) to
the oration Avkovpyov Katd wouxov čv Tø Katd Avkóºppovos.
Col. 14, l. 2. ets Añuvov tºrtrapy ov] The following pas-
sage is of considerable historical importance, and clearly shews
that it was the custom to send annually one of the hipparchs
to Lemnos at this time, to command the two principal cities
there, and to raise funds for the support of the cavalry. The
same thing is alluded to by Demosthenes in these words:
dAN' eis wey Añavov Tów Tap' vuòv fºrtrapyov êet T\eiv,
Töv 3' vTép tfis TóXews k+mud Tov dyovišouévay MévéAaov
iTTapyetv : (Demosth. Philipp. 1. p. 47, Reiske.) On which
Sauppe remarks: “Apparet...de solemni pompa Lemni quo-
tannis dueta cogitandum esse, Certa quidem ejus rei, quod
sciam, memoria non extat, sed insulam quotannis lustratam
esse...narrat Philostratus.” The charge of the processions
may very probably have been one of the duties of this officer,
but it is manifest from Hyperides that it was not the only
one. Sauppe appositely cites Plautus, Trucul. (I. I. 74):
Nam ego Lemno advenio Athenas nudius tertius, Legatus
quo hinc cum publico imperio fui.
l. 12. čari Keq)a?\mu eia Tpóttew] E: étursqóAatov sta-
Tpattetv. -
l. 24. "Hºpatoriq...kai Mvápivn] 8tto\ts éotiv h Añu-
vos' éxet yap Hºpalatíav kai Mvpivny. Schol. Apoll. Rhod.
Lib. 1. v. 604. See also Harpocrat. s. v. Hºpalgºria. Perhaps
the text should be corrected to Mvpivn.
Col. 15. l. 2, atttal) Probably we should read at airtat.
l. 17. oºk direipas àxtov] For a still more honourable
testimony to Lycurgus, see Hyperid. pro Evaen. (Col. 26):
Avkoup'yov Tó Aéyew ow8evös róv év tái TôAet katačečate-
pov bvra.
Col. 16. l. 23. Osópixel Of this orator or advocate
nothing appears to be known.

Y/ºr ºf
2.90 ºſCoſ Cº. 2\P6 Nº
ecºlºſ, 2JKACT? I OT ºr N22
A nºvºrºv-
y
TIPO Croÿ-CTIXPXNXO; ;
ºxenuovº Prloo-Wºº
ION exº~zººſ
jipool crºſſ Aſtºft
Yºu NJXJTO XYTON C10
2 ſºrex & Toºf
ºf troTºporučicſ. Tº
XONJTOTT2 PYXXJNT***
U \XXO C KXJX Coo C C Cº-
Nyftokaj Kºjcſ fºr
Tocº. Ovº-
jºjos KXJ ÖvöTtºº
OCH Cºſo N2 Juv/\ºS
Kºjo Tºro, Tojo YTO:
Rºjoſºerjºſº N
Nyxº~2JT12 Nºxo tº
-jecTI pozºoloº Oles
-ſtoxeroxof TN2 Jºº
O2 ºff (Toof oom-lºcrº
Judit T2 xpi crºſo2.J.
Jºel K2 Jon-Tºſovº
TUC NTCO NJTCONJ OY2
Xeſ cº-Itex xenºetor
XJoo) ºr Ojº
TO e YTonyTeCCN
T-tº-ſtoxeed COYT^^
7 5–2-> * —cºn ºr 1 or 12 €1- º
Xo1 TT ONNoſTC^2^ C &
D yºu oxyrg ſº
ATteſ car rºº & TiN2-
KPDJ C versiorº Tº
KOYC2 Nº. 3 Cº. CTOZ-
KACTT12 PION OY tº C
ºnepux Tºots, 22N
Kºtºxx, CoN KAJTTCP
2JJ Cof J AJ Cºl Cººſ ſcº
2-12-0TD2 J ºtes ºne
2\e TO J1)\ S.Ax&NoN
eru ITUTIONCTTTº Y.
Kºſºvº CTO's CyßJºr
XJorº Izart ºvºi Rº
XNJT12-ºxofoc oxx.cº)
Koccº cº-ſ ſex-AerºTº"
Cocº Tix Co NJO CUUACO’”
Tec Tºxcºtt fº
ºf to Noºckey Cººl
XG-ft C. Kºjtcz-O chººl
| 2 | ecocort C. Cº-
JUCon-CIOYNCTN) effº
- ~~ 25 J, RT toº
eproof ºurſ. Nº
U-5)\! CD H C NJ 6.x)
NJ 2 J JJ N OY2\º-
Art Tito YToorººl
X-
Tit, JºJorroßlonzº
THE ORATION
OF
HYPER IDES FOR E U XEN IPPUS,
IN REPLY TO THE INFORMATION PREFERRED BY
POLY EU C T U.S.
Col. 17. Col. 18.
"YTrép Ejéevtararov ‘AAA’ &yoye, 6 ăvöpes
eigayyektas, atroXoyia êukaoTal, (§7tep kai
\ A
\ \
Tpós Tloxwevktov. Tpós Tows Tapakaffn-
p 3. / 2/
puévows diptios éAe-
M 3. *
yov) 6avud ſo ei ºn
/ 3/
Tpooría Tavtat #6m
* * 2
July ai Touavrat eioſ-
/ \ V \
ayye?\tau Tó (wév Yap
f 3. /
Tpotepov etormy)éA-
* /
Xovºro Tap Juiv Tlud-
/
Maxos kal Aewa 6é-
\
V71S Kott KaNAta-Tpa-
/
Tos Kai (pixov d Čš 'A-
/ V f
vatov kai Gedºrupcos
\ /
6 Xmo-Tov droNéo as
e/ *
kai étépot Totovtov,
\ *
kai oi uév avºrów
ass 3. f
vavs aittav čxov-
* e N
tes Tpoëooval oi 6&
y >
7tóAets 'Affnvattov
\ / \ p
d 6é giftwp ſºv Aéyetv
\ * .2/ * /
pañ Tă ăptoſta Tó on-
\ 3/ P
pºp" kat oute Tovtov
p 3/
Trévºte àvºrwy ow-
W /
3eis UTégéive Töy
dyſova, dAA’ autoi ºxov-
P 3.
To pewyovres ék
e- f 3. >
Tris TróAews, oùT’ d’A-
Col. 19.
Aot ToMAoi Töv eio-
y
a yºye?\\opuévov,
3. 3. P Aº
dAA’ ºv ord viov ièeiv
$ 5 5 / *
dTr' eto-ayye?\tas Tuva
kptudgevov Útra-
/ 3. \
koúa'avºra cis to 6t-
/ e/
kao-Tmptov ovtws
V /
JTép uéyd'Aov dot-
/ W
knuatov kal Tept-
‘pavów ai eta-ayye-
/ º
Atal Toſtov fiorav’ vuvi
V * /
8è Tö yuvénévov
5 es A P
ev Tn TóXel 7td. v.v
A A 3. e
katayéAao Töv čo Tuv
/ *
Atoyvíðns uév kai
& /
'AvTiówpos d wétot-
5. /
kos eto-ayyéAAovtal
/ *
dis TAéovos uto-flowv-
V 5 / *
tes T.&s avXntpíðas
5\ t / /
h d vôpos ke?\évet,
'Aymarik\ns 6' 6 €k IIet-
/ / 5
patéos éti eis ‘AXi-
uovo-tous éveypd-
/
[ºpón], Evžévittos
3. V * > /
[3 VTep Töv čvvTví-
[ov] div pnow éo-
f * 3.
[paké]vai' (ºv ovde-
f / * >
uſtal Ömºrov Tóv al-
* p 5 \
Túw Toºray ovéév
Col. 17. l. 3. Tpos is expressed in the MS. by a single cursive character, Col. 18. I. 6. MS. néni—l. 26. MS. wyov to:
Col. 19. l. 3. This line is inserted above the column, the first letter being also written after eig'ayyevkouévov in the second line of
the column, and having the same mark affixed to it in both places.—l. 10. Tourwy. The MS. has been corrected, but this seems to
be the reading intended.—l. 13. eativ: thus corrected from sival in the MS.
Col. 18. l. 6. Tpoatataviraj Pseudo-Demosth. Epitaph. See Sauppe's Indow in Oratt. Att. p. 132; Smith's Dict. Gr.
p. 1393. (Reiske): āvew ris Tów &kovávrov sºvofas, kāv & Rom. Biogr. Vol. III. pp. II.4.1, 1142.
Utrepòd Nn Tø Aéyetv KaNós, Tpogéatm Tois àkoºſovow. l, 11. Aetoo.66wns] An Athenian general, condemned
1, 10. Tuéuaxos] An Athenian general, condemned to death (B. c. 361) for his naval defeat off Panormus by
(about B. c. 361) for betraying the army in Thrace to Cotys. Alexander, tyrant of Pherae, Diod. Sic. xv. § 95; Smith

NJ fºo! NJ U-b}\Jej TV Jºio
2 I ſex T. NOJ ' ) ) O AA->ſ
Kºxy TO UJAONJ2\Pecºs Kº-
CT * } & T. Iſry NJ, ºf tº ASvi
LA) N 3 jo).J CA) NJOYAfh
TOYC2 J Koº TACTT POTC-
for JT2JSºfrº. Tº
Tſ. CKXJ ft TC Plö CYTIC
JJº Nº CINJAK Cºre-ij-J x
Tiº Neo-To-Torºbes
XX) of JTom 2, 1-ox joc
KXJ TFI NJ2 Nyj- ſº NJ
º, c. x& N ºf ec Jiř
eff J Coru NJO” JN J
ºft OY_\xx^ſ ...) or x ov
T (ºr ºf JT'ſ K2 JTITUP 2
TIOXYen NIOC cº-Crº'º
d A Crºyoſº2-C1, NTO Q
jºr OXOſ OYXJ C JNOYC
| CXYP2C-Cºl'Tºx) Clº
9 J-ſex II Kººl
() C Keen C K & 2 Toº
TC0 N × 0-11N 2 J Corº
ºf CO2, Coºr-It-Jºl Poſt-
PONJOYZ.CONJCCXºh
Cö CI T1 NJ FTTOYTOY >
OYO tº ſix Cºy ONZOO 13 y J
2\tº \, XO TO YOT Oy ºf
Cº. T Cf. XXCYT1 Noºh
OJ I CAD Cºrv.2\; 1 J Keº-
Tº kºrf lo) of Novud
C’CUNT2 J N 2 J AJ ºf C2 J-
Tº 2 J N202 J&JNN2 JK
Cºl C tº Aº XJorcNo.
JYC cºic] Cºxx j etc.
J OZN F2 CTftſ CNJ C \
TOY JO ſ? P`Y_\xeſ CY ſlº
XJ 12JJTCO NTCONJ 22 J
Kf (JºJOJ NJOCA-CTirºl
ČNJ Tift TT Ox CT NU Ovvoyo
et CCO exo~ 21 CTIey
ºf X-CTOY23) TCON),
Xv, Kriſtºſ Cºrrèere
| Pºpe JRºcKiº. A C
focro NR2-ºxe 2.
|P # O-C CA-AC C-tº-
TCON CYN Cºl ON CC
AIl 2J of Flo 2.5 to Juo
e ºf Hirosnerºr,
K^0 CCTTI Fe-TUF 92%
TONJ2ACTPOTION] Sºº-
ºf 1 iTour J29 JNoory X2N Kn
UK AATCONJ XJ (b. NJToo NJ
K-2J NJoe Ad YCNA) ºf
X-C KAJA, Nº Ti" rºl
TXJt f ocºtrons. Tº
& To c > x-rooj J XJ 1229
Tº YT Crſt Nooru Orº
O eco-exei NJ To cel
Cºg Hej locſ iſ Něcº
JOY TH2ST Kxº~K ACT?”
ej JTCU No O J AJJ Ci P-
lºſe | N)2 ºf 13 JN of
ºrize, c'e NT chrº
Toºrºoºoºoº.
Noxon Kºſºvº
Koroccoºf cºlº
rºy (ºr ſolº Tº
ºx or tºxicº º
fºrtoru Nº º' by Yº OC& CT1 JIP o C ~
ºccicºſ ſºlº Hoºve-YYOY ſo Nº. —k (Neº
jºrſtepſ, UY Nºt º' O2 ºxº cºlºrTOYTº OYºu C cºyº Tº
U_ft or 22 fl V X. Cº. S2 of , 3 PXJSJ O ºve) clºtº XXXXThº
J_\ \ſt UCI JITUTIONº.1 ºxic flºº Titº’,
ºf 12 Jol of RX, XJ12J' '
THE ORATION OF
Col. 20,
Kouvoveſ Tó eio-
* f
ayye) Tukó vögq.
/ ^ y
T Kaitot, 6 &vöpes 6tra-
V J \ *
orral, éti Tôv čnuoat-
- /
ov dytóvov ov xpm
V $. V f
Toys oucao Ta’s Todºre-
V 5 e /
pov Tó ka0 kao Ta
* /
The Katnyopias Uto-
/ /
puévetv dicovetv,
\ 3. \ \ /
Tpiv avTó To kepd-
Aatov Tov dytovos
\ \ 3. \
kai Triv dutiypaqriv
€etdo-wortv, et éa-Tuv
5 * / \
ék Töv v0putov Ā
/ 3. \ / > t/
pum" ov Pud Ata, ow) āor-
2 * /
Tep ev Tn Katnyopſi]g
f 3/
IIoxſevktos éAeyev, oſtſ]
/ * V
ºpdorkov Četv Toys
dToMo'yovuévows
to-Yvotº ea-6at Tó eioſ-
X p O &
* /
ayye) Tukºp vöpig),
<\ A \ *
Ös ke?\eūet kato Tów
e / 3. *
pntopov avtov
T&s eio'ayyektas eſt]-
a- /
vat Tepi Tov Aéyet v)
\ 5 \ 3/ *
pum foºt Td diplo Ta Tó
f \ f
ômuſp, ou kata trav-
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS.
Col. 21.
Tov 'A6mvatov.
5 V \ 3/ y
€ya, 33 oite Tpdate-
5 \ 3\
pov ovdevös &v uvn-
A 5\ /
orðeinv in Tovſtov,
2/ / 3.
oùte TAetovs oiuat
* / a-
êeiv Adyovs Trouet-
\ 3/ V \
offat Tepi &AAov Tuvos h
c/ t 3.
ôte djs év Šmuokpa-
/ f /
Tig kūptot oi vöplot
/ \ 5.
êorov'Tau, kai ai eio-ay-
A \ y /
yeXtal kai ai &\\at kpt-
\ /
orets kata. Toys vó-
5
povs eio-tao tu eis
V / \
To Šukao Triptov Šud.
* V * e \
Towto Yap Jueſs JTép
t / * 5
dTâvºraju Töv dot-
/ t/ 3/
knpua Tov, Oora eo-Tuv
3. * / /
€v Tà TóAét, vöpious
3/ \ \
é6eo 6e Xopis Tepi
/ *
ékdo-Tov avTóv.
3. * V V e P
dareſ}eſ Tis Tepi Ta iepā;
\ /
ypaſpal doeſłetas
V \ P
Tpos Tov (3ao’ixéa.
* / 3. \
‘pawNés éo-Ti Tpds
\ * ae
Toys éav Too yovels;
& / 3. \ p
d &pxov čT Towtov
/ /
kóðn Tal]. Tapávo-
/ 5 *
pid Tus év Tn TóNet
Col. 22.
A. …”
Yodºpet; 6eo Moffe-
* / f
Töv avvéðptov ča-Tu.
5 z- 3/
drayayms &áta Tot-
* 5 \ * e/
eſ; dipyri Töv čvdeka.
/ V y
ka0éa-Tmke. Tov av-
\ \ / W 5
Töv če Tpétrov kal é-
\ * /
Ti Töv &AAov déukn-
/ /
pad. Twu ditravtov
\ / W 3.
kal voucus kat ap-
\
xas kal 6trao Tripua
\ / t
Td Tpoornkovta éká-
a Tots avtſov dºréðo-
V / 3-
Te. Jºrép Tívov ovv
3/ a- W 5
oleo-fle beiv Ta's ei-
p /
orayyektas ytyvéo-0at ;
• 5 3/ 5 ¢/
Too-T' iſèn kaff Škao Tov
> * / > /
ev Tºp voup eypa-
e/ V 3 es
Wrate, iva um dyvon
5 / *
pundeſs. ” &v Tus “ (pnoſi)
\ * \
” Töv Šmuov Töv 'A6m-
/ / 3.
valov kataAvon “.. et-
/ 6' 3/
kóTws, & divöpes outca-
V / 5
a Taí ri yap Totavtn at-
/ > /
Tia ow trapadéxetal
arº, A
a knyl-[v olū6eptav
3. \ 3 N3 t
owdevös ow8 JTaj-
/ \ V
pooríav, dANd Triv
Taxia Tnv autºv čeſ
Col. 20. l. l. The MS. is corrected from ováelve to ovøelv, the having a stroke drawn through it.—l. 13. MS. egerdºw.
Col. 21. 1, 13. MS. eigig'aaw, l. 22. after Ypapal follows a 6 in the MS. which is struck out.—l. 24. MS. 6agiNeal, the being
struck out afterwards. Col. 22. l. l. MS. Ypapn, the n being struck out.—l. 3. MS. axen, the erroneous p being afterwards can-
celled.—l. 10. MS. 6traornpial,—l. 12. MS. atroëore, a stroke being drawn through the ox—l. 18. MS. ayvon, and below kataAvon.—
I. 23. MS. Totovºtnt.
(as above), Vol. II. p. 760. This is probably the person in-
tended: but also another Leosthenes, who afterwards became
famous in the Lamian war, according to the Scholiast on
AEschines, 363 as duapréivets Töv Tept AuſputóAews TóAegov
épvydéevev. Sauppe, Oratt. Aft. p. 28 (Scholia). This took
place B. c. 358.
l. 12. KaN\to Tpatos, K.T.A..] For a full account of
the circumstances of this orator's condemnation (B.C. 361),
see Smith (as above), Vol. 1. pp. 577, 578; Sauppe, Ind.
in Oratt. Att. pp. 73, 74. I can discover nothing of Philo of
Anaea (opposite Samos) nor of Theotimus: Sestos was given
up to Athens by Ariobarzanes, B. c. 362; and was soon after-
wards lost to her, being aided by a party from Abydos, till
Chares, B. c. 353 recovered it. Thirlw. Hist. Gr. capp. xlii. xliii.
Col. 19. l. 5. Jirakoſaavta, K. T. A.] appearing in court
to answer to his name. Isaeus, trepi Tov Nik. KAñp. § 28. (p.
84, Reiske): TáAw diroypaſpels eis Triv (3ovXiv Kakovpyóv
vToxopóv čxeto Kai oux with covaev.
1. 21. Aymatiºns, K.T.A..] Harpocration, alluding to this
passage, says: Tepi 'A'yaatk\éovs "YTeptiºns Aéyer yéypat-
Tai kai Aevdpx? Aóryos kat' autov, Šv (; ÖeóñAwtat 6+.
'AXuovatows ovvedékage kai čud Toºro &#vos div Tā Toxºteig
éveypdqn. Cf. Bachm. Anecd. Graec. Vol. i. p. 12, and Suidas:
Ayaguëns’ 8voua Kiptov 6s Aéyétat AAuovatows 8ekdaal,
kai 3rd Towto śćvos div éºy'ypaprival Th Toxtretc. Perhaps
the MS. reading should be corrected to AyagucNjs.
Col. 20. l. 12. avtlypapºvl Harpocr. dutiypaſpſ, ...
Amuogbévns kata >Tepdvov kai "YTreptoms. He remarks,
that it may be used either of the plaintiff's or defendant's
plea : the former sense seems the less common one, but it
is so used here and at Col. 40. The argument of Hyperides
is this: that Euxenippus is not an orator, and therefore
cannot be impeached under a law framed exclusively against
orators. See Col. 40. l. 17, sqq.; and Col. 47. l. 5, sqq. for
more remarks to the same purpose.
l. 26. unfoºt]. The MS. reading can hardly be right:
probably we should read ºn td &piata.
Col. 21. 1, 8, as év Šmuokpattg] Pseudo-Demosth.

C-1 NJXJ ºf J Too 2\! is 2-
Tºorºº ſt 12-
TIOY cºſt is XI? Nº CC.
Jorºri U oyſto fºr ‘’
No No) N29 by fittº
TICT(o)\}}\ſ] the 2S] fo
Audith NJ NYCTſ T. CzłTN
TNJAYTi Ni US, CTPAJ)
2JJ fºl?ftTCA) * CA3 N.J.-Adºl
7\cTit II ºf , (T^Joe
xji,x_UUJ JC*- A Cºnnº)
jºuxt Hºxx-xx-x-5s
Yºng I 2 º'
- TonyToo) II tº NITUONJ
ſº fºreč et-Tux) ITtº
ſix? N XJTX2's Ríº y \xi >
Jº-T2 ſcº OJI X}\} TO
2se-Tºn 2 Jººſ'
Noyoºkaj jºurn
To cois T12 Polcev 1 tº
SA)To TP errºr ºf H
º : cºcº
doeſ: Pºs Cſ2Nººr lº
jº, TroTIONTONINº. 92
X \lory Jo Yºon-Jºº
geº-to-crosoft’s
JU - ºr J-1 9 A2-s fºr Jºº
O "Pºº XCe NJUOTNe-
It NO PITOf CCN ºf
JUOYNJ-Tººl ſo YºzºFSJ)\!
2NYºu oxvy Tep 2 Corº
Joy CŞ2 July 2 JCAN ech
KXJ C XXXOxxº~ CTIONY
C*YKTO Coºrſ US CC-CT tº
2 Nºzºº Gº OS CTC-CºjS
2JJ Cºl 3-ºxorces ſº
e-Y. To NJT XCTUS 1 C 1 O
2'ſ TCNTſ Kool Ny OJOJAA)
XPT Co-ºn) N.20 S1 A_\º
XXX O JTl2ONIJ tº CKXTH
ropol of 2,390) exº
Xel NJenyTooſ ſlf CTC^*
Xorce, Yöö CINTSON
jº
Xoſiº TOYTOT}^2-
Keyse, ONT*) To Cº
K2, ºxyCOO. Heº, ſº
2, KOY-i NTC N AT toº
TOYOxer Jools, ºr Ti
NCCCXCVTOYN Cº.
2NCJCoºl rºl. XXXXT[XNJ
T2NNJT PC cºſ 2\}\e ſo Xx C-
N]2-K2 JKex exei) JTUN
NAQ \\ON 2 N ×f-ij- co
CSC, N C Y2 e-Torſº
(8.)
TH or ſºft is etc. To YGºo
JUA orcºrt NJCK
º Hoxſtop of 12 colº
Xenºsceºlº
by ſt: , Rºſtro ºf
-Joſconzº Rotteº SY
2\eº tºº 2NYToº
ox-secºyº J2 JO renº
XXXXT ºf 2.JNeºNº TTolº
2J KXCT2.j ČJ Xjtë CA ºn N
JS v Cºrs, ſº is ºl
NON tº K2 JTorſ-
JOYººT Toºl
Ke5 T tº ON F 2, … 2
T1RooTCPor) ecTiTloy.
X00 N) Nº.2 NoNK».
ONJO NJ C NJTUJ NJ (O) tº.)
JºJT1 Cl2NCOTft Ceſºs
Toonjois-J KJN2S, NoN
* > Ja-S : 2-3 Jº-H2XY-
Nyft-ſix, ºſter exº~TOY
XTIOXOTC ſcº Torſoo,
TONJ K-OYXOXJºJ ox
Texº NJT O NITUON C2 tº
N},\l 2, NJ X ſ. 2, fºr 2 ho
ſt Ottº Sºr JOY Cº. Kº
CT2, CYTI CPTOYTI fºſ))^
TO CTX^! Sº!X2N2-23 ×
TO Se ET1 NJT X3 NHX",
T H tº TCD NLCSXey
O M E N CU) iſ Ni ETKee
Cl is, Cl) CITI e IT O J H
Me H Cl) is j tº Nº.11 El-l
TKM H CNNeyo Me Nº.
XI O R X. C.) X6 ) \N NCN
Xe'YTON ITXPXXXu
R}\}\! O N Te CG X ON tº
× NP N N H CXXI re'ſ
Orders e YNPe CTCU-
rode Golde IXenº
& Xck Kjºsë O'YCKN
rNPoe CH - Q2 trimr
KATAN KXI CJKO N
º }\}\}\e § X}\{e
N & TCU TH | KO
3 e is At'ſ M H e II XX
G N N E Ce GN \ }{TNſ
TH crxP e Nxe O N TV
N e C5 E is, l CAN TEC
Aſ Te NOYC
NA NA HJ H C K G C G \l'E'
A G CM l Cl) N Cl) CCY
Ne Kenºſ e N O ITGO N.
kx ROYXOY Me Hº
CU C KA, NYTO, Orl
TÉ CG Nº CCU) NA XT! -
T1 NM 1 O CO ITAN21 O C 6 N
TIAC I N }<}\! H KO || TH
AM I ANTO CTI OPNºſ.
TAP1-Al M O XOYC
P N i Oec
k
º NN]. I.YPO corro
- O CAPKOYN4 ER or , ,
Tom Cri APOYC, N ×y enº
To crape, PH seniºr
M H Ce2, NCL) O'YN Of
M H CEe TJS XTANG l
II CLCL cºre exppoſ
TNC H N1 NCNG TEI N
KC G KM O I R O H 63 Osſ
OYopoR H e H COM
T TI’O | H C G | N/A O | AJ-
ero) II o C t
M N H M C He Ye're] --
H TOY Mets C1) NYury
C! TI N G C G \}\}\} i <}\
"ſhº I NION NO TON
TOYe YGD tº Al 1896
Cuy Fo YNTeCTH Flek
KCI FITH CAN SCIP.
§. | NM El CG. NITH
fi I CTI HQ
|CX C6 Xe EC KAJ C H
NA e PON ONY TO Cls
el CTOYCK) CD N ×
N] N. NXN | CTI O J K I
ASAL CRXJ 3.6 N \l C}-H
Tix, ASPere GeekN
No fur KPxxP IT ke
k \l O'YCe el H tº Kºr
A1 Nis, O’ſ E PCU Hºt Nºltſ
G H O | COYK CD SD G
NH G H Q AN O I’i e Pl
Nº.
GX ONA G N G YC1 NCTH
Pi Orº º
OY Kexo~YC'ſ Nexºr
C 1 AN O 1 TH Clº H. H. H.
NATPeyº NTecopt
rajkićspe GTAl Z-
CD is TO XI An epi
AM NPT, Ace CTAN
T. AAI ATOYAP X e
Pe CD CTOYTG) is TN
CCD M N TAKAJN13×l
GTA I G 3 Cld TH CTI N
PG M R O NH C
A] Ol-NJ 1'C1' N NAT)
ACHA 1 ATOYi Al OY
Al M ATO CT or Nº
e3, CUTH CIn YXH CJ-
ru YN exerxcu NA e
e AIT POCXYTON ex”
TH Cri ºpera R O NH-
TO N O N e i Nl CNM ON
Syroºps O N Tee
OYTXP exora ell."
Aéro & N OYCXN II*
Al N }\}\}\}\TH N NA*A
NOYCAN en I ZHT'ſ
M 6 N OY}\!
N. l X TOYKN N eft-
M 6 N G YC A N'}\}'Ne
C 6 CD C A Aſ I A N Toe
TCD e CD TOYTecT N
kapri O N ×e secur
O KA O KO TOYNTC1)*
TOD O N ONA XT, NYTor
TH CNee YTIO 11 Ack
lº O | N CU) is J A CNA H
€ IT X \ N G by N G CO €
TOI XYTXI C ºf ey-
Nice Yxpect Tale
G C
TI e lee CeeTO CHP'ſ
NA 6 N O 1 CYNA Cid Hºl
KA YTI e I ke'ſ exiſtoic
*YToi TAPATP Yſits of
c1 is ºf fier"ról) hy
× CD N YN4 CD N Q. Cre
TO N XII O N C1) CO H
Te Ci tº NN4 eTAxxpes
TOY TO TI O Coci is
|< \ 1 NH H CTG N XZ O
Te CANY CITE NEC
Tºp Yº in roºf To \\
NYTOYAI XI YXY.C.) H
NO3 Nel CTOYCNJCL)
N XCTCD N \! CD N Cl)
A NA H N-
TIXPXK}\y\Cl) NeYMAs
2\AGANKD O J A N G X G
ce eTOYNOTOYTH
II Apºkºji CeCld Chº N ºf
AI AR PAxe CD Herie
CT1/\AY MA 1 N
rel is CDC Ker GTON
AAEXCPO N H fºi Cu K1
Tl NA O © G O H >JTIOXS
NY Me is O N tº €e or
ext Tºx, Orl epºx HTM
de éoºk or 1815 - as
ACT ACA Ce NI FI ºr
TACTOYCH TOY F-1s
NOYCYM CD NKNI
II ANTNCTOY CAN lºſt
AC Ti Azo NTAl YMAS
O 1 NIT OTH Cl TAN! N.
II roce’rxegºs I. Hºrºgº.
Fºllºw do tº Giºr ) TGot 'Yº Goriº"
b Riº POT. KKNH R1 (sº-A- * -
Cºrrs, 1 N H C is ex O Fires “RPºlºr.
NA G is G. N. T. P. C. N. KAN
A CD CG ENO N TE CAS c-ri ºr of +s
tº ACTP espe Cex. *-* ---
ri e P1 CCOTer Cocºe
| APAKNXGDTOYſo
TI O | H CXJ 1 N ANTNX*.
O is NT, O kNTACTN
e CD YM N
O N6 e CTH Ceir HNI-
O by NATAN TCD Nº 6 kNe
kpools Toº ſtol tº
N'NTCO is TT PO KNT*.
TO is Nºi e TNN E NX;
NA XT. A AG H H H Aſ
CU) is O YTON is NH
MCD N IN kATAPT
C}\l YF-4 NCe N TINN
TI & ITX G CD G | CTO Tl"!
H C N1 roe exti MA
NYºro YAYTODr. On
Clj N. G. N. H. N.M. l NTO ºf
Are cºro Nerº CD Diº
A' A. Zºroc//kazz." Geo/” 47%.7. Any/4//, /r/2 77.
f &
THE ORATION OF
Col. 23.
3. 3. *
eival év Tó Öuka-
!..." 35 SV /
otnputp: n avvin
3. \ y
7Tot 67ti katra. Avſoret
* êm 5\ e
Tov ompov n e tatpu-
V / 3\ 5 /
kov avva"yayn, m eav
/ \
Tis TóAuv Tuva: Too-
~ 3\ * 5\ \
86 # vaús i Tešºv
A \
à vavtuknv otpati-
\ 5\ e / 5\ \
dv, # 6ntwſp] dºv um
/ \ 3/ *
Aéyn Ta &ptoſta Tº
/ • 3 /
3muq, Tó 'Affnvaſ-
/ p
ov Xphuata Aapſ3d-
6 & e \ V 3/
1/(t)}/ Ta Auev avo
* y \ /
Tov wouov kata. Trav-
Taoy Töv ToMuttov
P • ? /
ypg|Navtes' ék Tövtov
\ \ 3. y
yāp kai Taoukhuata
z- / f . \
TaüTa yévout' &v' ºrd
\ * *
êe TeXevtaſov Tow
/ 3. * * e
vöuov kat' autóv Töv fin-
* 3/
Tópov, Tap' ois éo Tu
\ \ / V
ka. To Ypdqeuv Tó Nºn-
f
q to uata éuatve-
\ 3/
orðe yap &v et àA\ov Tu-
\ / \ f
wa Tporov Tov vo-
* 3/
pov Toutov č0e-
5\ t/ © 3. \
orðe ošTaos' et Tds
A \ \
Mév Tupids kai Ta’s
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS. 8
Col. 24.
diq eXtas Ék Tow Aé-
yetv of 6mtopes kap-
* \ \
Troövtat, Toys 3& kuv-
/ \ *
6%uovs wºrép avTóv
a- 5 / 3. /
Toſs ièuditats diveóñ-
t/
kate. d'AX & Maſs IIoxy-
e/
evkTos oi/Tws éo-Tiv
> * t/ 5
divöpeſos éa-Te eio-
p /
ayyektav Čučkov
3. f Aeº. V
ovk Šqn beiv Toys
/ *
petſyovras Tºp eio-
- * /
ayye) Tukó vöpiq,
* W V
Xpno-flat kal oi uév
/ / /
dAAou 7td v Tes katri-
/ 3/
yopot, 6tav oiwutat
* 3. * /
ôeiv čv Tó Tpotépg
/ * *
Aóyo Upexeſv Tóv
/ V 5
ºpewyðvtov Tas ato-
/ *
Aoytas, Towto Tapa-
p *
ke?\etſov Tai Tois 6t-
* V 5 P
kao Tais pam é6éAeuv
3. / * 5
cikovetv Tov d7To?\o-
/ f
youpévov, Šáv Tu-
3/ * P
ves ééo Too vöuov
/ 3
Aéywo-tv, dAA’ d7tav-
* \ } Aeyó
Tav Tpos Ta Aeyoué-
\ / A
va kai ke?\evel v Tov
/ /
v6Mov divaylvaj-
V \ 3.
orkeuv' ori) & Touvav-
T.C. 1/
Col. 25.
A \ 3. V /
Tloy T11y €us Tovs vo-
W 3.
povs kataqvyńv ék
* 3. f 3.
Tns ditroxo'ytas oiet
* p
êeiv dºpeAéa-6at Evže-
/ \ V /
víTºrov. T Kai Tpés Toſ-
3. W a
Tots, ovéé (30m6elv ow-
p A * > asº
8éva phs beiv avTó
3 N \ f
ovdé ovvaiyopeiſelv,
V / a.
d'AAd TapakeWeiſn Toſs
* V
6tkaoTaſs ºn 66Aetv
> A * >
dkovetv Tóv diva (3at-
/ *
vövtov. Kattou Tſ
P 5 * /
Tow Taov čv Tn TrøX et
f V
(3éAttov i öſnuo]-
/ / >
TukóTépôv éo-Tu, Tox-
Aſov
Adov
W /
kai &AAwu ka-
3/ 5\ e /
ov'Tov, n otro-
5 y 5 3.
Tus iótaſtns eis d-
* W /
yóva kal kívövvov
V V /
Katao-Tas pum Sº-
\ *
vnTat UTép éavTow
j * Aſ
dºtoxo'yeloréal, Toſtg
V /
Töv 3ovXówevov
Töv Toxttöv čeſ-
vat diva 6dvta (30–
* \ V
m0no at Kai Toys Šuka-
\ \ *
o Ta's UTép Too Tpdyaa-
Tos Tá číkata 6tódźat;
TJT(t) L/
Col. 23. I. 3. MS. zoº, a stroke being drawn through the v.–l. 5. MS. ovvaiyayn.—l. 16. MS. Tavró.—l. 20. MS. kata row.—
1. 24. MS. awara, the last letter being apparently cancelled.—l. 27. MS. mTas. Col. 24. l. 8. MS. warrass, the G being struck
out. l. 7. MS. pns.—l. 14, MS. 36A Tetov.
(Hyperides?) repl rôy Tpos A\eč. avv0mków (p. 211 Reiske.)
oiwat ovºv oita, Tois êmuokpatovuévois Tpérew as Tepi To
to ov kai Tô 3ikatov aſtrovééew.
1. 22. Opaqal) Either there is an ellipse of the verb,
or the scribe has omitted it : the construction of the other
clauses renders the latter alternative the more probable per-
haps of the two.
Col. 23. l. 4. étatpukov]= €Taipetav, a political club.
See Thucyd. VIII. 54, and Arnold's note. For the following
part of the law, compare the Fragment of the oration for
Lycophron preserved in Pollux, and explained above in the
note at p. 3. On the subject of sta'ayye) fat generally, the
reader may consult Smith's Dict. of Gr, and Rom. Antiq. s. v.
Col. 24. l. 5. ièuſtais] By the orators the toušrms is
often contrasted with the piſtop. Thus, Col. 40, l. 22, touštny
ôvta Kpfvels ēv Th Toº phropos Tášet. Hyperid. c. Demosth.
(Fragm. S. col. 1.) ovéé y duotos déucoſa w oi i8tºtal Aa-
/ \ f V t < * \ e y
(36 vºtes TO Xpwo tov K C. L. Ol pmtopes K.C. t. O & a Tpatmºyot: where
I have now followed the text of MM. Böckh and Sauppe.
AEschin. c. Timarch. (p. 2. l. 2. Ed. Steph.) ov učvov repl
Tów tºwtów d\\d kai Tepi Tøv pntópov.
Col. 25. l. 9. TapakeXein] Probably the MS. reading
should be corrected to TapakeWeiſel; and also Tuopſ in
Col. 48. l. 18 to Tuapel. For what follows, the oration for
Lycophron may be compared. Col. 9. l. 4, sqq. &art +,
Töv čv Tà TóAet ënuotikótepov Tow Tows ºvvauévows eitely
Tois dévvátois Tów Toxºtóv kvěvvetſovat (30mósiv;
Col. 26. l. 2. Toto'ſ Tºp Tpáyuate ow kéxpmaail = oux
oùTw Tetſparyudºteva’at.
l. 4. A\ečávºpov toº & Otov] This is probably the
MS. reading, but the letters are interpolated in a most
No-
thing seems to be known of this Alexander or of the action
mentioned against Polyeuctus.
l. 7. Aiyntôos pºms.] Hyperides belonged to the
Collytian deme (Pseudo-Plut. Wit. X. Oraft.), which was of
extraordinary manner. For Otov, see Harpocr. s. v.

XXXX)\! t 12J2-25TO Tol
OYTror ſtrºſ XXXI ºf
Kex Pitc2-1 ey
Tº”
2Neis2\ \xº~! QON
_5 OYOY
escºrteſ * I fico)
Cox) Rºjo Tool tº CHN)2
TCON 2 Nº. 1 Öf IN NJ
CAy NJ ºf XXCT C C T TTO
2S]]<> CTſºtſ) ONTC Yºko
TCC'ſ CONT2 CCC. KXTX
JU ºr ) >2-xxJ (2se-5. C-
ſº XTºº
TGFX ſooºyod Tºº CNC-
XPF Gº Ox Rºſſiroſh
C2 C OJ to cºe-ROY) ox *Y
XYROYf ſojº e N29-CTS
CYN Seº H. TCP ſt-TON]
T2-on-Teſco 12 sº-Tºſº
OY2&CNJo CTCJNC 7-Tº
TIOXC1 NXT 2-2-ecCTêFoº
ony PT ºf 23 on To) cºſe
_X \ºſº | ONJ KX) ºf ( →
ºr 12 o Konºtºcº
e-T2 CO1 UJejº e 3 º' Tº
KXJ D C , T ONJTTOYC
Ro Č ſtoº, NJT2 Cºx
job)\,X +eriºr vºn > *
2\{*N K* 12 Joko Nu-T-
ºr: CYNK»TH Toroyo
2 N. & Rxceceº Jocoy
JC-O, Joru YTerce2STby
2-Yº, 2 C2 let TTerry 29,
22 K, slox3-titoxer/ir v
Tº rºw Tl2 fexerry JK-x.
JNOc: Cºyºuſ TTToo S.
2 OTT 2, U.)Tſfºet'ſ KXJ
TTPeº-RYTe; oc OY?\ejūyo
ºxy Vºsſ TOY colkeſ
ºſcº ecºral Rojtees
fºr-ow 2 J2 Rojiejico,
J \) Y LC COY N H > X >
Jº Jºrſleſ, f^JºeNJ.N.”
2-Y tº Aºi Nxecſ Kºj
** ...ox N2 royee CCY
Vºl - cerj TH. Kºtti,
JO fl. & CKe 23 tº €2SJT Lo
2\\}^, eº RA-72, K-x,
tº N. KXCTONJ XYTors
§2 ºx-oxyTºo O2SH
ºciºc, ,
Cº-º: JJ Tºted 1777co
ANTCO) enj R2-J X}<!e-H
Nº ºi º Tojºſo N orbs
2-e Ko!. J H e-et ceny Y
Tººrºº
( 3 )
oftol 2 JTA wool 27 lºſ
ſti» TOTºtº.
TeXX & X & XN ºftºn
*t NXJ k2J Oºst-TUCN
TCADIY7 : Nº 17 U YTAYTox
AJIXſ Tū2\XJT fo CTON
2NT won 7-RºuxAnti-
JoeeocºrrectTroce—
TXTTêTAYTG = 2\ſ-rr, XXT
TIPOCºſt NX-lo\o ºf
2\ºtº CT ºr NYN |Xèſt ºf C
{rox^xtos Kºey
Cº-Ce2.JTOYū-eo Yºu
232 PºzoxºS ONTI C Ji
T2JNT(CH XJTFT ſtºke-
NJXJTU- Altº ſorºr
|Cº-º-exf Ft NJ.cº. TPow
CNYTIN JONJ ſpx?ciº
××NOTſer STT37 tº be
G-AJ.C.YX ºf OO NJ ºf Tſcº,
etc.2, expercTteº
TXTſº TTXPXTOY
tº-eo. YTITNXXJ-te-12-N
Cºxe-roy-roxyenjoy
KeTºo) rocłrtºſcºe
2\ºy To Teº Psive
KXTX^YO DJ D YN2 JN
JYJ AONJ O’N ×2\! Nºwy T.Nº
THE ORATION OF HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS. 9
Col. 26.
\ V /
dAAd, vi) Ata, autós Tot-
f P >
ovtº Tpaypiatt ov
/ 3. 3 tº 5 3/
kéxpmoral, d'AA' &T' & pew-
\ 3. as
'yes Tov dyóva. UT' 'AAé-
/ * 3/
£dvěpov Tow é; Ot-
\
ov čáka pièv ovy-
/ 3. * 3.
myopovs ék Tms Aiyn-
/ a- P
toos puxns it forw,
º \ V * 3. º
tºv ka? &yd) eis fiv al-
\ & \ * 3. \
pe6els wºrd orov, Šk Če
* /
Töv &AAwy 'A6nvaſ-
3. P > \ V
tov čka)\eus é7rt To
f \
3ukaoTriptov Toys 80-
/ / W \
měřío-ovtds o'ou. kal Tai
\ 3/ / a"A /
puév d'AAa Tí óeſ Aé-
e- \ f
yetv ; avTó Sé Towtºp
*A * * A
Tô dyóvi Tôs ké-
p
2(pnoſau; ov Katnºydpm-
t / 3. / 5
oras 67tóora é8ow?\ov; ov
- * /
Avkovpyov čka Aets
y
ovykaTmyopnorov-
3/ * Aé
Ta, ovte Tºp Aeyetv
> \ * 5. *
où8évôs Töv čv Tn
P /
TöAet katačeéortepov
3/ \ A
ovta, Tapa Towtous Te
/ - W
puérptov kai étuel-
km 6okovvta, eivat ;
Col. 27.
Aéïv kai Öttökovitt
W /
Tovs ovykaTmyopovs
/ *A
diva (343do-aortal, Ös ow
P V *
Mövov Jºrép o'eavtov
/ 3. * >
ëſvaa’at eiteſv, dA-
* e/ f /
Ad kai 6An Tóxet Tod-
/ e
yuata Tapexelv ura-
\ 3.
vös ei. Evževittip
3’ th 5 Af 3. W V
ôtt iówáTns éo-Ti kal
P 3 Q \ \
Tpeo:3úTepos ovdé Tows
/ W \ 5 /
qíAovs kai Tovs oikei-
ovs égeo-tat 3ondeſv'
\ y
ei öé wº, ötaffºnóñorov-
e \ es \ A
Tat UT d orov, v'n Ata,
V V P
Ta Yap TreTpa Yueva
* y 5 \
avºró beiva: ča-Ti kai
3/ / \
dišta, 6avdºtov, as ori)
f *
Aéyets v Th Katn-
/ f V 6.
yopia. XkéN-ao 66 on, &
3/ \
&vöpes dukao-Tai, ka-
3 eV. t/ *
6' év čkao-Tov avºrów
3. / zºº.
éáetáčovtes. 6 on-
/
Mos Tpoorétašev
3. / /
Evčevittº Tpt-p
avºró eykatakAtôň-
3. \ e \ *
vat €ts To tepov, ovtos
6é Koundels éviſ-
Col. 28.
*A * Öm 5
o Tºp ompaq atay-
asº. • 3 > \ &
'yeſ}\at. TouT' et Mév U-
W
Trexduğaves d'An6és
•3. \ ty 3. 5
eival, kal 6 eiðev čv
~ ef * \
Tô iſ rvg Tojt’ avTów
3. * \ V
dTayyeſ}\at 7pós Tów
* p \ 3. *
3muov, Tí kal doukei
&\ e \ 3. as /
& 6 fleds avTó Tpooré-
• 2 3. /
Tatte Tajt’ &ayyet\as
\ / 2
Tpos 'Affnvatows; ei
V e/ V /
ôé, éa-Tep vuv, Aéºyeus,
3. a- 3. V /
ſituſo avTöv kata-kew-
a-aa-6at Toº 6eoû ka?
f f W
xapuśduevöv Tual pun
Td?\m0n d7tnyyeXké-
a- f 9 y
vat Tºp ôňup, ow \rm-
* \
‘ptopia èxpñv ore Tpós
\ 5 /
Tó éviſtvlov ypdqetv,
3. 2 e/
d'AA' (37tep 6 TpóTepos
5. *A / 's'
éptov Aé'yov eitrev)
3. V
eis AéAqot's Téuyav-
/ *
Ta Tv6éa-6at Tapd: Toº
* V y
6eoû Tºv dAſíðetav.
V Öğ * V >
Gºv oe Tov to Mév ovk
> / f
étoinoſas, Yºmpto-aa.
\ \ 5
8è autoTeXès éypasſ-as
kata: čvolv ‘pwkaïv
3. \ \ 3/
eita arol uév čeatt
\ / V
kai pewyovti Tows
(3onóñorov'Tas ka-
Tvićv pnotiv ièeiv
> / /
ow uðvov déukaštatov
Col. 26. l. 4. The last four letters seem to have been rov6; the two first have been cancelled, and 0 has been corrected to ºr, so as to
leave vºr; the vir however is repeated after the original line, followed by axe.—l. 5. The interpolated letters are (apparently) avčp Tovešov,
the first four of which form part of the word AAéčavěpov.–l. 8. MS. mTng wi.—l. 14. MS. Kara-l. 17. The MS. is thus corrected from Tov
a yovos.-l. 21. MS. avvkatnyopnoſovºra : So also below.—l. 26. MS. erºn. Col. 27. l. 25. MS. evkarakAtônival.—l. 26. MS. Tepov. Col.
GS T
28. l. 3. MS. axmón—l. 7, ačike: ; the MS. is thus corrected from ačukia.—l. 12. MS. mov, apparently.—l. 19. MS. wºrpor-l. 20. The
MS. is thus corrected from eitely,–l. 24. MS. ovik. See Col. 6, l. 3.
the tribe AEgeis.
l. 20.
Col. 15. l. 17. 3 kathºyopos (Lycurgus) ovk dTeipas àxov
(Harpocr.)
Avkoúpyov K.T.A..] Cf. Hyperid. pro Lycophr.
row Xéyetv etoffa's 86 ToMAdkis dyovíčea bat. His popularity,
to which Hyperides here testifies, appears to have been very
well deserved. See Pseudo-Plutarch. (Wit. X. Oraft.).
Col. 27. 1, 25. Gºykatak\{}ºvat, K.T.A..] The history of
the whole matter seems to have been as follows: Athens
came into possession of lands in Oropus, no doubt the terri-
tory which Philip restored to them after the battle of
Chaeroneia, B. c. 338. The ten tribes obtained shares of
these lands by lot; a particular mountain fell to the share
Doubts, either
feigned or sincere, were expressed as to the lawfulness of
their occupation of it : because it was supposed to have been
assigned to the hero Amphiaraus.
and two more were appointed to sleep in his temple at
Accordingly Euxenippus
Oropus in expectation of an oracular answer concerning the
matter in hand. Euxenippus, it is manifest, reports the
ground to be sacred, and incapable of being held by the two
tribes, Polyeuctus accordingly proposes a decree that these
tribes shall give up the land, and that the other eight tribes
shall compensate them for their loss. This proposition ap-
peared absurd and inconsistent, according to Hyperides, for
these reasons: “If the mountain was justly the property of
the tribes, Polyeuctus ought not to have proposed to alienate
it : but if not, then he ought not to have proposed that the
of the tribes Acamantis and Hippothoontis.
other eight tribes should make up the loss to them, for they

fºLºl-ſtol LIN on Logºz
ſº Yºº on LT&S I Cºrſº
of St Oooºz-z (1 Cºrk Yo
*Ye-LSAC/SY
ºS Non Sºcº R.
* Nº C& Jºel LIN 15 gº
* Colº(ºl iſ rioſ as
**rºrºol iſ Noza 5
* Cºvas lºca
* kºzº (os tº Nicoſ
sºrºro NO3] [[NC
He-> d cºtton ſº No L
S 13 Co LJCºg ſº. ONZO $o
Sºlº NYYYYYY on LA. Jºe L
*2+ ovka, as tº
Nº Old 15 tº Nº ox! N.
YYYX () DYKYo Sºzoº
*Hººl ºp ſº H-Lſ 4-yl LNGO
|- ſo d^* ! tºujsz R&R
tº e Lºs |-L-Dº () [ _
^ſº Hºroo LNYSU sº
-->L'OYYHY24 & LNOJeſ
C-Lº ſº-LN-e-Q fºcſº cºol
->YNo-L (1-0-or- ſo tº
tº Jºzoos press L
ºil tºo q
U--O-L-A-C) C-Li CY) LNLºyº
or/
ſojºſº, ſº ſº) N.C.O. (O1 [Y
ſysztºco) Lí tº Jº e ſº ſº.
tº ſool_I}} (SLOSY1PS3
19 Llo ºpee Rio Lº C. L.C.
opºseſ a pºsſ Nºu.
Nuºva Nº! I LO-14 3
–91 D&0\(JYºr. 3 ſº
stoo-oºrºº:
—tº tºsſ Cºf rea ºual
grºoz.cº. Le --9 [Goſd)--ſº
ºrzſcotstolºcc Norſ
J Jº (okod - to leg oodlf
< *-ºſ-C4 N to A Q-5 CYYY
o) tº J.C., Q.C.O Cº L-e o-to L
Jº Nº-ſdºz_1 N.C.LLP) tº Y
Moſá R. J.N& ſº ſº. Crºztºc) Nº.
ood *Lºse&_e
SYYYYYY L. C. Nz
Sºoº. CŞ.9 ×o Cºxº~& Q ( C&
^*X499 on Zºos too, u.
* cºres. --> SO Tºo)—ſ ſ
doxºnoom oojo or to J
H 5°Now (Adyſ (Co L (O
[Yſ ſeniºr ſept O LIN&M f aſ
Rooſ [Nº. 1 ſº ſºocº Lº Q
rºozolº tº Job
*Nºtrºpºſes
ſ
2 tº ſº [ſº] 4 ſolſtºyº R. J.
| cºat-A C Cº-C3) J D $v.
Root® ſolº.)
*Lº NZSN2 No.4s tº
Sºdo o Lºokoxes &
After-cºlº OY) {
oqJ1 Lºo Nºcº LINº ſq
odºrº [Cº-Q (CY) / O / .
Jºº. Lºu Oºººº LNCN
|L LIN-2) [...N.A.C. tº Lºſ & C
*QLſwolº Lod. Loco tº ſ.
NCNZen Dº Nº NJ) fºr I.
tº [[[[XN Cºyº dº ſ I coul.
Sojoalſcºoxol roºt-
Yaleº-Cº low Lºº L
PHLN.cooleol LLL'ſ NºNo Li
^^^^{Y&Noxºg º O ſo Oſ
Q-Lºo Loch LNOYZoº_L\º
* on LINA of otºſcº
* Refºſcoli coſº, tº gº f
* | |{ACY Lſº ONJ. I.
sº tº NoLI
Odilºloſſ No £Róiſ Ao LONº.
ideligºt tº ºrcocºa foºd
* NOllllſ ºf 23 NZAO
Nº NY 4N 1 to CONC) p.
Jºn Lorz ico Lºkoo LSº
ſºſ O J LINY (No ſºlº (NC3
THE ORATION OF
Col. 29.
dAA& kai évavtſov
avºró avTó 31' 37tep
#Aws Tapavéutov,
ow & Evēēvitrov.
éetdowpiev 8& Tepi
autoſ, Tovtovi Tov Tpó-
arov. ai puxal advövo
yevénevai Ta Špm
Tà év 'Opató buet-
Aovto, Tov Shuov
avºtaſs 36VTos TouTo
Tö àpos' éAaxév 'Akapaav-
Tis kai ‘ITToffoovtts.
Taütas Tas (pw8&s éypa-
Wras droëovvai Tô &pos
Tô 'Auſpiapāq, kai Tàu
Tuñv 6v dréðov-
To, dis Todtepov toys
6pto-Tós Tows Tevrm-
kovta ééeXóvtas aw-
To Tô 666 kai d'po-
pía'avtas, kal ou Tpoor-
nkövta's Tās ovo pu-
A&s éxoſa as Tê špos.
pukpóv če 6taXitrov
év Tavrò lºng to pati
ypdqets Tās dicta)
pvX&s Toufioral Taïv
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS.
Col. 30.
* as V y
êvolv qvXaiv tá Sud-
ºpopa kal diročovval,
eſ 5\ V 3. arº
&Taos &v puri €AaTTøv-
/ 3. \ 3/
Tai kaitot ei Mév tol-
ov Tów pvXów dºn-
es / Asºº
pov Tó Öpos, Tós ovk dp-
* f \ \
yńs détos; el 38 wº
Tpoornkóvros eixov
\ * * 5f
awto dº Ad Tow 6eoû 6v,
3. \
6td. Tí Tàs &AAas puxas
3/ 3. *
êypaq'es avTais Tpoor-
atroëtóóvat dipyūptov ;
\ º
dyatrmºrov yāp mºv av-
Tais ei Tà Too 6eoû dro-
V
360 ovoi kal um
f
Tpooratoria ovaruv dpyū-
puov. T TaüT' év Tó Öuka-
o Tnpip éetašćue-
3. 3. * 3. /
va, ovk dp0ós éð6ket
\
yeypdq6al, d’AAd kate-
/ / e
Wºngpio-auté arov oi 31-
º \ /
kaoTat. eit' et pév dºré-
\ V
q evyes Triv Ypaqriv
3. 5\ ſ
oùk &v Kateyréða-ato
oùTos Toº 6eoû, étrel-
3) & avvé8m orot diAſo-
val, EváéviTºrov čeſ
J f \
dToxtoxéval' kai oroi
I0
Col. 31.
M * * f
Mév Tó Toucūto Nºn-
quorua 'ypdykavitt Trév-
Te kai eikoot Spaxuſov
€Tipujón, Töv 6&
p > \
kaTakAu0évra eis Tó
iepov Tov Shuow ke-
Aévoſavtos pund €v
Th 'Attiki, bef Tefláp-
6at'
ore Tepi Tºv pud Amv
\ 3.
êelvd y&p étroin-
5 A 3.
€doras 'OXvuTuděa d-
Aº. \ 3/
vaðeival eis To dyax-
• & p Aº
pua Tris ‘Yºyuetas' Touro
v M
yap jzroxapſ34vets,
f *
épôotov Šavrò eis
\ as \ P
Töv dyöva. To €ket-
3/ p
wns 6voua Tapaºpé-
V /
pov Kai Kołaket-
av \revön Katnyoptov
Evževitzrov, Moros
K \ 3 V Jº * Å
at op'yny avTºp orva-
p V *
Aéeuv trapd Töv
* * V º
Čukao-Töv. čeſ 33, &
P \ 5 \ *
8éAttorte, un éti Tū
f >
'OAvpuzrudêos dwó-
W *
pati kai Tô 'AAešáv-
ëpov Töv troXu'rtov
Col. 29. l. 8. MS. opm.—l. 28. MS. ray. Col. 30. l. 13. MS. aurois-l. 16. MS. drottoto ovo, apyviptov–l. 22. MS. *. Col. 31,
1. 4. MS. ereignóni.—l. 8. The MS. appears to have had retaqeval originally, but the scribe may probably have intended to correct it to
reffaq,0al, if so, he has omitted to change the r into 0, and cancel the val-l. 9. MS. Selvyap-l. 13. MS. vyetas.-l. 18. MS. Koxačei'av
vº, the et being cancelled.—l. 21. MS. ovv|Aešeiv.–l. 24. MS. Tov, the v having been cancelled.
ought only to have been too thankful to have restored the
sacred property without being fined into the bargain.” The
dicasts taking this view of the matter, rejected the propo-
sition, and condemned Polyeuctus in a fine of 25 drachms,
without any reference to Euxenippus. Polyeuctus, incensed
at this failure, and supposing himself to have been deceived
by Euxenippus' report, now accuses him of being in collusion
with certain Athenians, (see Col. 48), and intimates that the
vision which he saw was well paid for before it was seen, be-
sides introducing a variety of other matters into the accusa-
tion. Hyperides defends Euxenippus on the ground that
the indictment is informal (Col. 28, &c.) and also incredible
in itself (Col. 48).
Col. 28. l. 25. Jºmºptoſua autoTeXés] an absolute proposi-
tion ; i.e. from which no appeal could be made. Suidas
s.v. avtotex is avtoreAijs Sikh, dq' is owk eatu èkka)\é-
gag 6al eq' étépav.
Col. 29. l. 16. Auſpiapów] For some remarks on the
oracle of Amphiaraus at Oropus, and the ceremonies observed
by those who consulted it, see Smith's Dict. Gr. & Rom.
Antiq. s. v. Oraculum : also a learned note in Meineke's
Fragmenta Comicorum Græcorum. Vol. 2. p. 950.
l. 19. optotds To's Tevtåkov'ra] optotijs is a word
acknowledged by Pollux in this sense (6 opt(ov), and it
is so used in later Greek: the office is probably the same
as that of finitor among the Latins. See Ernest. Clao.
Cicer. s. v. They would seem from this passage to have con-
stituted a kind of college.
l. 28. Totna at Taiv 8voiv ºpvXaiv T& êudºpopa K.T.A..]
should raise the amount for the two tribes and pay it over to
them. Epict. Enchir. c. 25. § 4, 86s oùv to êudºpopov, et got
Ava trexel, 6aov Twºeirat. See Alberti on Hesychius s. v.
&ldqopov.
Col. 31. l. 12. To dya)\ua Tºs Yºysetas] Pausanias
(Lib. I. c. 23) mentions that at Athens her image was
placed in the Acropolis near to that of Diitrephes and
Athena Hygieia.
l. 15. € páðtov] food for the accusation (being in fact only
Tº NJ X-Zºfit Tri N. Kºkorº
Tf ºf ſix Cº. 2, XX-0
Tº JN ºrd ſºloſt Pocmong
2\ft. Axonºr Tony X-e-Hºux.
CJ N Cºſt CTC:\X-30 C, AJ&T
T^2 JYS 202, ºft2>CT2JTPoo
Tº KONT2 To Te2.J.J.2 crejº
Jºſſ ºf Tric Toxeux,
XJNJT + 2\e ſº yºu K2JTIf oc
To Yºſt Koº TºrtA psy
ſº) N2, KAJC XO ſº coº)
KXJ Cºf CToko, NJONTús T.
ºft Noor's Cºw e^P)
ONJT OF e-Ye-Cè-ºj žo H
ºft Conºrſ ºf try (2JFIA
Cºyº-e Sºci J R & N clºse-
TICOTUOTC 2 NJ C CTſt C.
OY2-6-XO To NJT eP12 Y-
TC0N 6°T O J } (cºo ex-ſex
2Sºulci ce coyº
TT tº 2-3 Cºſt TCO) 2.j to
XCC2) ºr ºf 1777 or
Rºp rºckoxesºter
ºf N2 - 6°Eer) J H cº-fºu
342 Ke2 ON cols ONJ &–
*NZººU H. c.2 kb ºf race—
NoN ſtop-ſt CUAX
Kęż-ON | XJS. ft 6 K-6-f
NJCA) NJT'ſ N) \YTºo Aº 2-
JºJONJ ºf cºſtſ N ANY.,
Toyo) KuxN f{Xrcºue-
NJo NJ Tºo M & Korſ Ó-ems, T-wº
†t enjºſº | TXAXJo NJ Tºx
ſt)\O forcółºxy OYCT+
NJACOYNT(CTI ef ſº,
CT+trio (T. cººrſTixſo
pºſt-tºo" to Tºr
Torrors. Tº Tºrºſº
Tools et Pit ROT2K2-
J-tRocºuochº”
Trico CT2 ×(TOYſ" t2. T
—roºt-cºcytcrºſſ's
on 233 octº" tº
-roºxy rºcºcº º
ºrreool 2, K2, ST?'9"
Roºkourº ºrºfº”
Tºjº (OT) >
forcico, Kºsºº"
+tº eſcº Jº Pº-
Nortºrrecolº"
artox.cf cºcºrtePºº.
Tools, 2JJºoºoºoº-
Y-ſtepe sensoºrºº
ſo YC, NTTT f 2 JTSYC17'7
/ ºr "
OY Ju - N ONJ 20 ox 22-
XX sºlo) ××o 2-9 tº
Nxo cº-crºſſº
2s, ºr es Tºots?" **
ckºfie N KXJTGººfn
-Hopcº TorcTTºrerº
Noor ºxº co-fºº
+2 cººrſ coºl
—fºczers, 2 or ſº
—ſo- ceketocºlſº
rºck, Jr. toº”.
jockey cº’sº
xº~~Tº coſ^*
YTI -
Tºpocloºc, Kººs
ºoco+ei ovºº
bºrror-roots ecº".
Tionº.
joN cº-cº.
jºyoº evº
OYxeſ cº-ſº 3 NXCT
crite orcTºº ºC
cy rºy Tºſtf
- Tſtorzº
KXJeczºº'. -
Kojºſº | ST".
ferocºdocº tº
ºf

THE ORATION OF
Col. 32.
sº y
Tuva Çnteſv Kaków
GP
Ti épydoraoréal, dAN' 3-
3. * V V
Tav ekeuvo Trpos Tov
* \ P
3muov Tov 'Affnvaſ-
/ \
tov čTrio TéAXoot pum
V / V \
Tà èticata undé Tó, trpool-
/
#kovta, Tóte divao Tav-
C * * /
Ta Jºrép Tris TóAews
3. / W \
divºruñé'yetv kai Tpds
Toys frcoviras trap' av-
Töv Sukatoxo'yeſo-flat
\ º
kai eis Tó kouvöv Tóv
‘EAAñvov ovvéðpt-
/
ov Tropečeo-flat 8on-
* P
6;forovta Th Tarpiði.
3. 3. * \ 3.
or) 3’ exei uév ovde-
5 /
TraſtroTe divéa-Tºſs
ow8é Adryov rept av-
gº. 3. A 3. /
Töv čToujo-w, évôd-
V *
êe 86 puoreſs 'OXvp-
y 3. \ * 3)
Trudêa Čºri Tô ditro-
5 /
Aéoral Evžévitrov,
W
kai přis kóAaka avtov
º 2 W
eival éketvns kal
*\ 3.
Makeóðvøv. Öv é-
V / 3. /
dv Šešns dºptypié-
vov 7tdººrote eis Ma-
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS. 11
Col. 33.
y SN > p
kedovíav ji éket-
y
vov Tuvé Jiročešć-
Mévov eis Tºv av-
gº >\ . y
Tow oikiav h Xpoſue-
vov Töv čkeiðév Tuva
f
à évrvyxdvovira,
3\ / * t
# Adyovs kai ovo-Tu-
* 5\ 2 3.
vasouv ji étrº èpºya-
/ 5\ 9 *
otnotov # év Tſi dyo-
• 3\
pq m
/ * /
Tovtov Tov Tpaypua-
&AAoôt Trov Tepi
Tov eipnkóta, kal
pun koo-pitos kai ué-
Tpíos Tá autoi, trpat-
Tovta dortepet Tus
kal &AAos Töv Toxt-
Töv, xpno-do floorav
avré, oi SukaoTal & Ti
8owſ\ovitat. ei ºydp Tau-
Ta fiv dAn6m & katn-
yopets owk &v ord uévos
#öets dAAd kal oi &A-
Aoi Tävres of év Tn
TóNet, dio-Tep kai Tepi
Töv &AAwv, Šorot Ti
JTép éketvov h \é-
\
yovoiv h Tpattovariv,
Col. 34.
3. f
ow padvov autoi d'A-
\ 3/
X& kal oi &AXot 'Affn-
*A 3. V
valot to aori kai Tá ºrat-
8ta. Tà ék Töv Štěa-
* * e
orkaAetov, kal Töv 6n-
V p
Tópov roës ºrap' éket-
vov uto-6apvoov-
* f
Tas kal Töv &AAtov
A
Tovs £evišovitas
M 3. * ef
Toys ékeiðev #kov-
W W
Tas kai Ütroëexoplé-
W 3. \ e \
vows kai eis Tás Óðoys
gº g/
JTravºttovºtas ŠTav
/ 3.
Tpoortworv kai ovoa-
• 3/ \ &
Moû &\ret ovéé Tap' é-
f 3.
vi Towrov Evžévitt-
/
Trov katapuffuotpie-
\ S 3 P
vov. at 6' éketvov
W 3 N / p
puév ovdéva kpíveis
3 N2 3. 3. * P
ovć’ eis dytóva kafft-
&\ / 2
otns ot's Tróvºres fora-
* y
ori Tavta Tpattov'Tas,
3. p \
kat' Evževitzrov čá
/
Końaketav [k]atnyo-
* º º p V 3. /
peſs of 6 3ſos Tºv airt-
3. &
av ou Tapadéxetal.
/ 2 * º
Kaitot, €t vovv etxes,
Col. 32. l.20. MS. petreis.-l.23. MS. pns.—l. 26. MS. aqetype]vov. Col. 33. l. 7. MS. Aoyouss, a mark is placed over the redundants.
Col. 34. 1, 22. MS. "parrors—l. 25. MS. o. Bios—l. 27. MS. ovv. This line is enclosed in brackets in the MS., being erroneously re-
peated in the following column, where, however, ovu is corrected to vovv.
a pretext). Demosth. Tpos (popu.. (p. 917 Reiske) étrétèm
3é Toºro èk troAAów hueMXev čexeryx6;forea flat \!evööuevos,
...tmvukapta peta}ax\óuevos avviatatat we'rd roo Adutièos
kai pnaiv čkeive to xpwatov diročedokéval, épéðtov učv
Naſºv Tó Tºv avy'Ypapriv kexeiew, our du myoſuevos &
huas eitrópos ééeXéºyśat 8aa uévot Tpós avtoVs at Toi
T pd;6 LCl!/o
Col. 32. l. 2. dAX &rav čkéivot k.T.A..] From what fol-
lows it is clear that the present oration belongs to the time
of Alexander's reign, (B.C. 336–323). Neither is it likely
that the present oration is very much later than the battle
of Chaeroneia (B. c. 338), with which the division of the terri-
tory of Oropus is immediately connected. Upon the whole,
we may conclude with some probability perhaps that this
speech of Hyperides was delivered B.C. 334, or a little later.
The present account of the religious offerings which Athenians
and Macedonians alike made in each other's temples, and of
the jealousy which they alike felt of one another is entertain-
ing enough: I know not whether the transactions named are
alluded to by any other writer.
l, 12. To kolvöv Tów ‘EXAhvov avvéºptov] On the
origin and constitution of this confederacy (B. c. 346) see
Thirlwall's Hist. of Greece, Vol. W. cap. xliv, Frequent men-
tion of it occurs in the writings of the orators. It appears
to have been recognized by the Macedonian sovereigns as the
legitimate guardian of the rights of the Greek states. The
unjust demands made of this congress by Alexander (to
which Hyperides alludes) may possibly be the decree for the
restoration of the Greek exiles which he proposed to them
through Nicanor at the Olympian festival, B. c. 324, but they
rather seem to be somewhat earlier, and may naturally be
referred to the discussions that arose out of the treaty
formed by the congress held at Corinth (about B. c. 334),
soon after which Alexander established tyrannies in Messene
and Achaia. Some of its precautions against Alexander
are mentioned in the oration trepi Tôv Tpos A\éðavöpov

s: ºre, eºsexes
TTCP ſº TTC CP129J (C
TT-CC23 J XTºe & cºff C
OYT2 Neº Cºſt ſtº
TTT tºo. OnTº 299 c \!
}\o TON Cºx Cº-CNT Sº
exerſ to fit coo! O Y ſo-
2 pºor TC 2 JXT K&
3G, on Toº Oro Nº.
2\feczºrº crº- 2 Soº-
Teoº.cxxox ſcº
Yºu N ojºux cerſ
kxj+ xxxHxſtcTºontrºl
Tſep Prºsexuz co-º'"
… x+1 cº, Kºyº Cºic Tifº
Cºyſtojºnſu Ko Cºtſ?-
JULe-ºvo) (socO! O NJTC
KXXXJ C Tojº Kx}Tºº-
TuxNTxT2 xko)-cºre”-
K-x, Koc.ºo NTToº!
KXJ-ſtojo-Tºtºſłł100
orſtºfºcker-cººl
Teckx, e-etop 20.4 º'
e Yºc, 2 N-I-coxº~2°h
ºxyvoº, Xitécretxº
Te CCT(efºo Cy Yºſt CXJe:
To exo CTſt Cºl CºuTIC
2-3 || Cock?JY__x ºf
Tools ºf ſtºceeoº Y
Tºp OTIONJT1 NJ2 N29-ſt
A tub)\}.2cy-joon, KXTº rºi
NJ cocko. RCN & Cº. º.
Kei Orkofeº cºſt fºr
3 xxx.cº. 6 º' 2-CTI)
Toy Fereº rºº
ecou º T2ACTP2 ſtoºd
3 cº-Titcºxº~2 cºf
Top 12-C ſt Pit KOTCC
CColº-Co Cºrſº P2X3T1
Troy ONY Lºſt 122-ſº
T2, 2.0 ft NJi-tcl bº) tº 2 c.
T1, kocºelº execſ tº
+tº N2 cºcº
Nît orkºłecTºº)
cº-2s, kyy 2-coccToº? 'S
++2+t ex-ſco)2+ tº
cº, 2JJTi ONJ rºl
N24 tº JTIYoºTº"
_{r(XeF5, Sºfocº
TXTTTTTOXCT crº-OY
O2,032-von-J 29 OCT foº
eT2, 3 enj Cºſſíº
Teſ2.JTo 2 ſ 23 JºJºſ S ^
2-193 × 1-to e-T1) K-9 °
Tief TOYTº Y_3_XJ NJ
T-2 eſ SJTU. A 27 2-Tºº
T(x-Foxx, Jú2^OCON
TºccTucſojº.cºº
+(xcopºerrift. JoJº S
claxy. It cºrriſoºr”
cert N on Korº Tºº
++ker-Hºº-oºººº.
ke, oºzees K. Nº"
exº~. Leº lºſſ?-
Tſef ºriº Te TO
† o-rº engxºi ºf tº ºr
tº crºcee exº~ *
(zz )
HºrrºToroco'ſ troº
+23xxJToc XX\oº
cºſtNo.5 it oxyerº
cocebulo 2-of-Cºcoº
Rºxº-tropiº, o ſº
Troºt cºyo Kºrſolº
expºrt Neſſ cºſt ºf Tife
++ prºce: Toº Tºº
Cºyº KXJN rººkeyº
NJXCXI-Lºrrroº Cºlº
- 2 ºf N crº-ºſteº
Toyſon cNeºN ſºº
ce 2, 2009. Tº fiſſiº
THE ORATION OF
Col. 35.
Trept ye Tns pudams
The divateffeforms
3/ > 5\
OUT O. 1/
Ev£évitzroy
iTuđ oit’ &v &AAov
Aóyov ovééva èvraj-
6a étroumoro, où yap
p
KOZL
t / \ /
dpuéTTel. 6td: Tá;
W / º 3/
Mov Tóv Adºyov, dº àv-
êpes dukaoTal, dikoúa-a-
<\ y
Te, Św uéAAto Aéyetv.
T ‘Yuív 'OAvuºrids éry-
kAmuata Tetroint at
\ /
Tepi Tà év Aw8øvn
ow 6ikata, as éyò 6is
3/ as y
#ön év Tó Smug,
évavtſov duſov
* 2/
kal Tóv &AAwv 'A6m-
\ \ t/
watov Tpós Tovs –
kovitas Tap' auths é-
/ 3. p
£h?\eyāa ow Tpoorfirov-
3. * f
Ta avTijv ćykAniua-
gº / 3. *
Ta Tin TóAet éyka Now-
ºf e- \ e V
oravº Úuiv yap d Zets
6 Aw8wvalos Tpoor-
étašev čv rà uov-
p \ }/ A. ſis
Teug To aya Apia Tn
f
Autóvns étrukoo-
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS. 12
Col. 36.
*. as P
paña'al' Kai Üueſs Tpd-
/ y
orwarov Te koopanora-
* /
pºevot as oióv Te
\ 2/
kóAXto-Tov kai TââAa
A V 3 /
Trávta Ta dróNov6a,
V f W
kai kāq-Mov To?\viv
kal Toxvtexh Tn 6e-
gº /
q, Tapaorkevadav-
W y V
Tes, kal 6ewptav kai
/ as "
6voltav Tox\ſov Xpm–
p 5 /
MdTwy dToo-Tet?\av-
Tés étrékoo"pufa’ate
V / * y
Tô $60s Tſis Autóvns
2 Sºe/ * & * 3.
dāios kai Üutov av-
* \ * *
Töv kal Tns fleoû. Ú-
V P *
Trép Toutov Juiv
A 5 p º
Td €yk\muata fiX6e
/
Tap 'OXvuTudoos év
Taſs étrio-ToMaſs, wis
f
m Xaipa, ein i Moxoo-
* º \ e V
oría alſTſis év i to tepov
f *
éo-Tuv' owkoúv Tpoor-
mkev mu&s Töv ć-
* 2 <\ *
keſ ovéé év kuvelv.
> \ V / \
ea v Auev Touvvy Ta.
V \ /
Tepi Triv pud Amv yeyo-
5 /
váTa év dèukhuatl
/ - 6.
Wºnºpto-no-6e 61.1/Cºl.
Col. 37.
/ \ W e
Tpotov Tuva kat m-
putov avºrtov katayu-
V
vajo-kopiev as Tà é-
* 3. 3. * 3. p
ket ovk dp06s étpd-
3 M 9 3. w
£auev, Śāv 3’ &ri
* p
Tov yeyevnuevov
* \
éópev Tós Tpayºot-
as auths kai Tàs karm-
/ 3. p
yopias dºpnpnkötés
3. / 2 V P
éodueffa. ov yap on-
/ \
Tov 'OXvpºrtdºt uév
\ P V
“TO. 'Affiivnariv tepa 6-
* /
Trukoo'neſv čeotiv
* V \ 3. /
riuſy Öé Ta €v Aw86-
3. 3/ V
wn ovk Šćeo-Tai, kai
Taota Too 6eoû Tpoor-
/ 2}
Tāśavros. T’AAA’ our é-
- 3. P
o-Tuv, to IIoWvevkte,
*. /
(ajs époi čokeſ) 66ev
/ N
Katmyopiav ovk &v
f y
7Tolmorato. KalTOl Oré
€xpñv, étrettep Tpo-
y A
homoral Toxtteve-
\
orðat (kal vi) Ata kal 69-
V \ 5 y
vaa’at) pui Tovs ióud-
Tas kptvetv umě’ eis
P /
“TOUTOUS 1/60tly leu)6-
3. \ zºº. e
offat, d\\d Töv 6ntó-
Col. 35. l. 11. MS. evk\nuata, and similarly below. Col. 36. 1, 11. MS. arºrexatre, the e being cancelled.—l. 21. MS. ispov.–
l, 26. MS, wºn. Col. 37. l. 2. MS. Katayetlvøgſkopaev.–l. 24. MS. Šva : the three original letters being cancelled.
avv6mków, a work sometimes assigned to Demosthenes, but
which rather appears to be the work of Hyperides (p. 215,
Reiske) éat, yap v Tais avv6;ras TueMeigõat Tots
avvespešovtas kai Toijs étri Tà kown puxakfi TeTaºyué-
vows, &tas Šv Tais kowavoiſaats TóAeat ths eipiivns an
yfyvoviral 6&vatoi kai putyai Tapd Tows Ketuévows Tais
TóNegi vöuous, unès xpmuárov &muelſaeis, undé yńs dva-
8agaoi, undé xpeov dirokotal, uměč ŠoćAov direAev6epúgets
étri vetoteptopſø.
Col. 34. Tov bntópov Toys Tap éketvov Aug 0apvoovtas]
Among these are to be included, besides many others, we
This
whole passage is worthy of attention, allowance being made
fear, the names of Demades, Æschines, and Pytheas.
for some exaggeration, as shewing the fearlessness and
openness of the Macedonian party, and its consequent
strength at Athens at the present time.
Col. 35.1. 14. Ös éºyd, Sls hºn K. T. A.] No other notice
of these orations of Hyperides has descended to us, than
what the present passage contains: nor do any of the frag-
ments of his orations now extant appear to refer to these
transactions.
Col. 36. l. 9, 6eaptav = 0ewpoſs. Pseph. ap. Demosth.
de Coron. p. 256. &Too Teixal flewptas is Tós év Tó ‘EXAdé,
Tavn'yūpias.
Col. 37. l. 7. Tpaygëtas] See Hyperid. pro Lycophr.
Col. 10. l. 20.
1. 24. Kai vn Ald kai ºvarai. A noble testimony to
the abilities of Polyeuctus. For what little is known of him
see Smith's Dict. Gr. and Rom. Biogr. Vol. III. p. 462,
and for the scanty remains of his orations Sauppe's Oratt.
Att. (Fragmenta) pp. 273, 274. If the following remarks
of Hyperides are well founded, the present speech must
have been delivered before that of Polyeuctus kata Amuděov,
which dates about 334 B, C, apparently.

pºols exºST1Sºft)
Toº--or KPIN circIP-
++trºceſſºrſ tº
2J kx, Xrºſ XIT "Tº
res eſcº'ſ Tºº
Tºxº~ TOYToº"
Fºx Toº }J2 c62J ſº-
TTC’ſ NT TXUTIONJOJ O
Co.;23 Jº Tuonº!Tro?-,
Pºrra cºrrtºrº
‘Nimrto OYZ-Cºrco N2-
Nº ſcºrſoon otſ
2 exºr KXJoyce-Jºof
-Roco ſº ºcſNitrºſ
The N ×Ynſo Cºleº
++N ×TPo, Toºrſ fi Tſo
XH-crº-K cºx frtºl XX.
Xox 2\xº~Tecºlºrfiº
OYXeº) 2.T to JTIOTC 7
e-NToo R100)Crºr cº-
ft2.jīz-e-H cl KX0 OCON
tºns 2-cv-1TucKorter
C2 TT N × CCTYN KCKPl
$2J&J ºf CAſ tº 2-K2-
erecTALK?-??) crodº
T2. To Nºuzºt is e-QS
JC2C ſorºroc & NTh
TVQXT-12 ſcºre T?
K2J O YTO Cerºſon-Tool
Tºo!2\! K2, cºtt Picoſ ITX.
Pºo-Fréjoycºſts
Y ſe 28 OTU eTTTON
cºtt Tion OC2\CTNJ O
TxTOC2SON C1 ºf NXJToorº
CNTſ-() T(OXC1 #12 o
Kf XJi-tTONJ, ſº Joyclong
O Côf 3 CYTXTXK2JXQº-
TeCTXTXT-Iſſlo XITCix-
Keºfºº TOYTON J
C&J Tºº? KCTUS YTICF
CºN t | XJTITUA, YTúrife-
Tef is XJ KXT2 Tit (TÜo
JNCCocci XON CNTºo!
2N Nº CT-ſtpſcs). K2 JTTIN
cfc2.ſ Tex/299 errº
2\! K292 N K2Joe CT(Cp
UNJOJ OcRex Cºyºff H
TOP2.0 ×JT^2\ºſ Cº -
J3t T23'-fi cºſ^Toolzºt
Joy Trºy 12-67 tº 20 º'
Xprºxiºuſºvo's
T2-KXJ2\ºf et-ſix; 2.
TDONJTºpany'ſ 12-TIf XT
TonyTooxy-Tºſz's law”
K2J OZ-o Yºrod c2ST1c
× PTT cºcº O'TTON Cte
tº
2\ſſ tº J2, NJ XJNJ2, OYN2J
2\,XXYT O K-2 SJUST (2J C
ſp2-2-TXAerite's oria
3-Pl CTXToo-jit Jºo -
X-Prºrº Roº?
errºre-Hid. Cºx > y
Torrſt errºiºſº
NJNT22 cc TTCN 0YT^
Afyorº Toolzº tº ºffſ
JºJº) 2. Rºw Nº.7°
+tº ºxſix-reſtº’.
O)N S㺠e-cy: A wo Tſº
ſciſt ºſcº OxTº
Heſpx. Ludºw on 2 º'
ON F2 pºſſ N2-C 17N7
Tojº AroorwººlTriº ºf
CºſtOftcº Crº
GTTC ºf Nerº ºjº TITTo?"
f{COY J-2 Pl CTXTCOſ
23-tºol cºſ^*cſ??-
+2 let CTI tº crºſſº
X}) ]2- 0.3Tr(N2-o NT*-
kPſyc+ cºnſiſtſ Cºffſ
TopOCT2-2 ºf Jºy ºf KPX-
Jºeſter JTi toºſ rrº-
Høef Toox, e-TCP&S
Xrſity cKXJXu XRojºs>
|
TEIE ORATION OF
Col. 38.
5 / 3. 2-
pov čáv Tus doukn
e- /
Tovtov kpueuv, ortpa-
\ 3 / \ \
Tmºyos eav Tus pun Ta
/ / *
3ikata Tpattn Tow-
/
Tov eio'ayyéAXeuv'
V V / f
Trapd yap Towtous éo Tu
\ / f
kai Tô 6iſuao-0at (3Ad-
V / e/
7TTeuv Tijv TóAuv, Ö-
\ 5 *.
orot &v avTöv 7tpoat-
póvtat, ou Tap' Evge-
A 5 N \ *
víTTg, ovéé Tóv 6t-
es /
kao-Töv Towtov ov-
/ V 5 \ \ e/
ôevi. Kai ov orè uév ow-
3/ * /
Tws otopiat àetv Todt-
\ \ 3/
Tetv avTós 6é &AAov
V p *
Tuva Tpotov Tn To-
f p 5
Alteig kéxpnpaat, d\-
> 2 V 3. /
A’ ow8’ avTós ièuaſtny
3 N / P
ovčáva Taj7Torre
iv Tó (3to èkpua
ev Tºp ptºp ekpua,
3/ / y
jón Óé Tuori kaffoorov
p 3. /
€övvduny é8omón-
/ 3. /
ora. Tuvas ovv kekpt-
ka kai eis dyöva ka-
6é © *A es
éo Taka ; pua Toqºtov-
\ / eV
Ta Töv 'Ağnviéa, Ös
HYPERIDES
Col. 39.
º 5 /
kai oëtos év Towtºp
* A
Tô dukao Tnpiq, Ta-
f / y
pd ovo Mºngovs dré-
P A
pvye Atotetón Tóv
/ &M /
Xphttlov, Ös êeuvá-
TaTos dokei eival Tov
2 * p
év tº TóAet Pixo-
f V 5 /
kpātm Töv 'Ayvovortov,
<\ W V 3.
Ös floaoiſtata kal do ex-
/ * /
yéo Tata Tn Toxtteig
/ *
kéxpntal, Tourov eio-
/ > \ e W
ayyetAas Éya) v7rép
º /
tºv (pixitzrºp Jºrmpé-
- \ \ * y
Tet kal kata. Tns 7To-
Aews eiàov čv Tó
/ V \
ôukao Tnpíq, kal Triv
3/
eio'ayyektav čypaylºa
e/
êukatav kal 60-trep
t P A e y
d vôpos ke?\évet, on-
3/ y
Topa Śvta Aéºyeuv
\ \ 3/ * /
puń Tā āpta-Ta Tó 6m-
as, A
paq, T6 'Affnvatov,
/
Xphuata \apſ3dvov-
\ \
Ta kai 600peds trapd
Töv Taivavitta Tpa T-
/. * f
Tóvºrov Tó Ömug,
FOR EUXENIPPUS. 13
Col. 40.
ayyeXtav fövt 300wal,
3. P
dAA’ JTokóTo trapé-
P N3 3. 3. *
Ypaka , Tao’ eitev ov Tó.
* /
&ptoſta T6 on up
/
Xphuata Aaſaivº “
3. \ y r
eita. To Yºngpuapua av-
ass c y w /
Toj Jºré)payla" Kai Ta-
Xuy”
sf gº Öm !-
aptota Tºp on up Xpm
/ º 2 \
,, Tabe eitrev ov Ta
- f \ V
para Xaga.jv’ “ kai Tó
P 3. /
^!, hºpto-pia. Tapéypa-
\ 3/
q}ov kai éa-Ti uot Tev-
/ 5\ e / *
Takts à ééâkis Touro
/ A
yeypappuévov 8tkal-
V 3/ *
ov yao (jumv Četv
5 * \ V /
Töv dyöva kal Triv kpt-
* V 5 M \
oriv trouña’at. at 6' & Mév
* 5 y
eitreſv Evēēvitrov
\ \ y *
qºs ou Tà épio Ta Tó
/ 6. /
ôňug ovk eixes 'ypd-
5 V 5 /
^kat eis Triv eiq'ayyekt-
3. / 3 x/
av, iówºrny 6' àvºra.
/ 5 es. gº
kpíveis év Tn Toº 6ñ-
/ V
Topos Tášet' pukpd
8è Tepi Tns duttypa-
5. / 5 *
taxvpotatos év Tn
A /
ToxiTeig yeyévnTat
\ 5 N 3 c/ 2 P
kai ovo' oitos dºré-
es 3. \ & /
qns eitav Štěpas
/ \ \
aitías kai Ölago.Nds
xpngé uot triv eig-
Col. 38. l. 14, MS. onal-l. 20. MS. ekpelva.—l. 26. MS. Aičnviea. Col. 39. l. 4, MS. Atotiffn-l. 11. MS. learaa, the last
being struck out—l. 24. Ms. Sops. Col. 40 l. 24. Ms. despa.
Col. 38. l. 24. ka0éataka] This is probably the most
ancient authority extant for the use of the transitive form
of the perfect. Buttmann (Irreg. Gr. Verbs) remarks that
it belongs to a later aera,’ and cites éqearáket from Poly-
bius (x. 20): Liddell and Scott say of Śataka (s. v.) “pro-
bably not before Polybius.”
1. 25. Apta toq,6vtal “De rebus Aristophontis post
alios nuper accuratissime exposuit A. Schaefer in Philologi
Schneidewiniani Vol. 1. p. 187. sqq.” Sauppe, Oraft. Att.
(Fragmenta) p. 282 : where several fragments of the oration
of Hyperides against him may be seen. Kekaugântal 6
Aptoroºpów dºs...... otpatnyńo as év Kép kai &id pi\oxon-
wattav ToxAd kakd épyagóuevos Toºs évotkovytas, ép' 6
Ypapels wiro YTepetőov Tapavöuov čáAw. Schol. Æschin. (ut
supra.) The last remark is of course erroneous, if Hyperides,
in the present passage, and the Scholiast refer to the same
oration against Aristophon : the date of it is uncertain.
l, 26. Aſnviéal Polemo (ap. Suidam, s. v.) calls AKnviei's
(with the aspirate) the old Attic form.
l, 27 toxupératosl Hyperid. c. Aristoph. (ut supra)
^ \ t * / /
oiče ºyap avTºp êečouévnv &etav kai Tpattew kai 'Ypápew
& Ti &v éuſ?paxu £30ſ&ntal.
Col. 39. l. 1. Čv Towtº Tó êukaatmpiº] The court of
Heliaea. See Col. 49.
l. 4. Atotelém Tov >q ſtriov, Mr Hogg (Transactions
of the Royal Soc. of Lit. Vol. 4, p. 216) conjectures, with
great probability, that this is the Athenian general whom
Demosthenes successfully defended in his existing oration on
the Chersonese, B. c. 341. See Smith, Dict. Gr. and Rom.
Biog. Vol. I. p. 1049. Nothing further is known of the oration
of Hyperides against Diopeithes.
l. 7. dpi)\okpárn K.T.A..] Demosth. de Fals. Leg. p. 376
(Reiske): 3 Toivov toratov učv yé yovey, obºevos & early
éAaTTov anuelov toº Tempakéval Tootov Šavrov quxittip,
6edoragõe. to Te Sharov Tpºny, &T' eighty-ysi\ev Yareptºns
dºt\okpátmv, ôtt Tape.N66), éºyd) êvoxepaively épmy év Ti Tàs
eigayyektas, et uðvos dºtMokpa Tns Togoſtov Kai Townſtov
dèurmudrov attos yé yovey, oi & evvéa Tův Tpégéewv um-
The oration of Hyperides against Philocrates dates
B. c. 343, according to Sauppe, Oraft. Attic. (Fragmenta), p.
301, where further information may be found.
Col. 40. l. 1. Fävil This is probably simply a clerical

ºf ket
TOY \ciº Lºcopo
Rºctºrſ (xj ºr fºrerse-
2N2 on KXJ2-ſtºſ)Tſuº
Noc-12 JTº cº-e?
K^l 29 JN3 cl ID | > r2-S
KXJ-Mſ Of 12-c. 179 ex}\}J A6v.
e. As CNJ O ITT tº ſcºſ
ſexux cºſt ºf TTÜoN ºve
rſon ſuff-roxTDC Kºſſly
ropite errſtºº
ſcºnſº XI (29 JToº
pºroſco, 24x2 crº-T
#5&erts uxo-creſt º'
2 e_A_Lºt2 exºo ſo?'
TT cºrn 2-YToo Nº TUC KA57 J
-T2 ſox ſtory ºf D. CX ºf
fºx ſtrº-HTXJ TCON ſºf
KXTH ſofſtereº Too Yº
Fourt). Aſ oxxJ Oo
ſtay Y-ſto-Itty of ſit)
Top N2 tº eſco Nº.
Arſ Teſ2.J NATOT tºº-
~ſcº, 2 epºx, or Tºº
& NTCOXOTCO) X^Toº
NYCS-2TU"YTTOCOY Octſuº
on X295 6-23 Jairº, cºjº
erºs, ºxº
Neºerºic Cº.
tº 3 Nos M OTKO Te TTX-Pè-
l e-eſ-ſo 10 e-NJTS3 Nºſº
i. 3) yºk, c tº cºſt»oyº
O Cect-tºu & Cº. TTT'"
KXIT tº INJ2MX^ Too?"
03 COY ke^2-1 lºcº ON ſº?-
jJUNyoºrcº, cº-e-
KT & 3 ºf CUU c) JTONJ X-
For 2-roºrſ on OYZºº
2-titor, ecſ tº erºſº
--toxxx Oy TOCKe NIT
Tºuſ efºre oxy roºroº
XeroRITO CK2K oftº-
kx jo-Tºox++-lºc ºf G*
2\ºc-J-2 coºr> 1 > *
Cocºo et ſuo YOTTO"
TITNJſ. KJoooºs º-' "
cxo 1-to-NJV teſt ºr ºf
To Y ſtf ArtXXXIO C. KXITQ
Tº >.2J Kº Yº XXCOK?)
Nº tº Ocitor K2-y
K U o Ao Kitt Cºf X
2s A1 (SST tox revºſt
* 3 y Q ſº XXTºrtA
Xx i tº tº u Cº.
C-T-17J Oºſ2
e º Tºti ol Koºx.
( 24 )
_A_\º-NJ H CY-Tº-A-Go?\!?-?
Xoccº Teſeº.º. oº
exº tºo tº Xorºrº
TOY,\tt J Acºrſo YA Crfi
ºxyvoº TOYC2se SYKO
39 y Toº OYCTº
Tºto).JT up NYTIOTINº.
tºtºx CC 202 ft x & POYC
OYTIpoſ c ſºj > xxx Ro H
êeſ R2-JTi Po TONJ.Lº.
Tic, Aocy-or-Jº-H -
e ex} xrt of Pºros
-j-HNJCºo YTKPXTOYCOY
Cix}\} co C2, Ji XJ. Q. C. ׺
OYCXNº ºt-T (XCO), Up N
He ſtro TX]^^ -
Tº "º CAU.SJCCºſt-2
KerNJr. Nº. 1299 fºr
cxc) on Jºo YTh?
KNCOYC; Trºjeº
NXJ N CT to COO Cº-
NYXT[OTf JTN). A y CTXº-
Xºrſ, YYTH Kººl
TO CO TO (2J (º-
JJTſ of Şecers
Tº NJ XT NJ A orex
THE ORATION OF
Col. 41.
t/ / 3. 5
#kets ºpépov kat av-
Toj, Aérywv dis Puxo-
arº. \ y >
k\eſ Triv 0wyatépa š-
\ /
êtêow kai Annotto-
yos 6taurav čAaſºev,
\ 3/
kal &AA as Touaitas
Katnyootas, iv. čáv uév
myopias, M
3. / * 3.
dq)épévot Tns eio'ay-
/ V * 3/
'yexías Trépì Töv šša,
zº /
Tov Tpaypatos Katn-
A 3.
yopmöévtov droxo-
yóvtat, dizravittooruv
5 * e \ P
autoſs of Öukao-Tai , T:
es * W V
Tau6' miuiv \éºyeTe “; 6&v
\ /
ôé pundéva Agyov
Tepi avtov Toutov-
\ zºº
Tat, d dyov avTois Xet-
/ * \
pov Yuvntal Tov yap
f
Katmyopmóévtov
V \ V
Tô uń Aagov droxo-
\ * *
ytav Úto Tn dpyń
Töv Čukao-Töv kata-
y \ \ /
AetTreTal' Kai Tºd Trøy-
/ *
Tov ČetvöTaTov Tów
* / P
€v Tó Adyg Aeyoué-
e V * <\ \ 3/
vov v^To orov, o orv ºp-
/ * c/
ov \avödveuv, 6v ć-
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS.
Col. 42.
veka Aéyets, où Nav-
f /
6ávov 67tóTe Tapa-
y J. as / .
‘p6éyyovo €v Tó Aéryºp
p P
ToAXakus, djs TAoûort-
/ > <- /
6s éo-Tuv EvžéviTºros'
* V
kai Taxu, 6taXutov,
3. /
dis ovic Čk Čukatov troX-
* / p
Añv ovo-tav orvvet Ae-
<\ 5 \ V 5
KTau' a eus Mev Tov a-
es. * \
yóva Tootov ovéév
/ 5
êmºrov ča-Töv eite
V * p
To?\}\d: ov'Tos kökt-n-
3/ 3. / ass V
Tat eite d'Atºya, Too 6é
f p -
Aéyov'Tos Kakombeta.
\ P V
kai ÜztóAmylºus eis Toys
V 3. /
êukao Ta's ov dukata,
2/ / º
djs &\\offi Tov oſſrol
\ / 5\
Tn v Yvopanv av
/ 5\ 3 > 5 *
O'Youmorav m et avTov
* / y
Too Tpdywatos. "I Kai Tró-
3. wº & Aº e /
Teſpov doukei Juás Ó kpt-
3\ 3\
v[ou]evos 11 OU KCZ-
es 5 \ *
k[6s éjuol Sokels ei-
/ 6. /
3|{v}at, 6 IIoXijevkte'
[oi 3’’Affnv]aſol Taúra yu-
/ A' e 3.
|vajo-kovot Tlávres, 3rt ov-
V \ 5/ 3.
[öév učv čja Tuv ov-
6|aplow) āv Tij oikov-
14
Col. 43.
/ 3/ /
Meun, ovte uovap-
3f V
Xos oite 6eds,
/
MeyaxonºvXóTepov
arº, / av
Toº offuov Towſ 'Affn-
/ \ V
vatov. Toys 3& ovko-
/ a-
q'avtovuévows Tov
Toxtºrtov Jard Tuvov,
5\ 3 */ 5\ t/
à ka0° àva fi &6povs,
2 •/. 3. V
où Tpoietal diAAd 3on-
* as V
6el. kal Tpótov uév
Ttoºlbos Tov 'AyovXm-
6ev d"Toyodyavtos
\ 5 y 3.
Tºv Ev6vkpdºrovs ow-
/ e /
a tav dis &nuoaſtav
º <\ y
ovo-av, f 7TAedvov
à éânkovta Taxdv-
Tov fiv, kal uet' é-
/ Z e
ketvn v 7td.Xuv U7tt-
/ V
oxvoupevov Tm v
QuAttºrſov kal Navart-
k\éovs d Toyodºretv
kai Aéyoſ utlos, djs é; d-
vazroypſ dºplov pietàA-
Awv Tſet\}ovtſikaat,
Tooroſſro où Tot dºré-
Autov [dicolſo ea-flat
zº, /
Tuva TſotoWTo]v Adyov
Col. 41. I. 22. MS. kata]\tTrétat.—l. 24. MS. Sevaſtov.
Col. 42.1. 8. Ms. awādkra-l. 14. Ms. easonia.
Col. 43. l. 2. The
|MS. Originally had detov, but it has been corrected rather clumsily to 0sos.—l. 27. MS. [are] ada.
error; the last two letters of the preceding word being
repeated. At any rate &v must be cancelled.
Col. 41. l. 2. Dixok\ell His vices appear to be buried
with him : at least I can find no account of either.
1. 4. Amuotovos étaitav ćAaflew. This Demotion is,
probably, the prodigal parasite-feeder mentioned by Timo-
cles, a poet of the Middle Comedy. Athenaeus, Lib. vi. e.
42 (Vol. I. p. 529. Ed. Dind.): Tiwokxms 3' év 'Ettortoxals
kai dis Amuotiwut tº do & Tº Tapao troovros attoo (Xape-
‘pévros) Munuoveſet'
& / \ * * *
O Anaottow 3é Tapapevelv airó, Soków
y p y
Tdpºyüptov ovk épétéet', dAAd Tapétpeºpe
\ /
‘TO ly £3ovXóuevov, K.T.A.
Hyperides then appears to mean that Euxenippus was ac-
cused of accepting the sumptuous fare of Demotion, i.e. of
dining at his table as a parasite; the expression, however,
ötavráv Tuvos \awſºdvetv, is a singular one if this be the
meaning of it. We have, indeed, 8tairav sixmpéval in Iam-
blichus Wit. Pyth. § 124 (p. 105. Kust.), but in a totally dif.
ferent sense (arbitrium suscipere): āA\ov Šē Stavray sixm-
ºpóra uéyònv, ékárepov Teto avta Töv čtvrpe lºdvºrov,
k. T. A. Hence some may prefer to construe the passage
thus, ‘that he had undertaken an arbitration for Demotion,”
and had so mixed himself up with an unpopular character.
l. 7. iv. čdy pév K.T.A..] Cf. Hyperid. pro Lycophr, coll.
7, 8: also Fragm. Harris. n. 9. col. 2.
l. 27. 6v čveka Xéyets] is your motive for mentioning
them. -
Col. 42. l. 18. oxoing av] A rare form for oxolev.
Damoxenus Comicus (ap. Athen. Tib. III. c. 60. Vol. I. p. 236.
Dind.) has 3otnoav for 3otev.
l, 22. kakós etēśvat] = dyvoeiv. See Harpocrat. s. v.
In place of Šokeis, 6 IIoWſevkre, strict accu-
racy would require Šokei IIoxſevktos.
Col. 43. l. 20. (pix{Tºrov) Probably this is the Philip
against whom Dinarchus composed an oration, kata pix{t-
* y A
KCLKOUS etóóTes.
arov peta\\tkós. See Sauppe, Oratº. Attic. (Fragmenta),
p. 324. I have not been able to connect the other names
here mentioned with the motices, which are furnished by the
Orators or others, of persons having the same names.
l, 22. čá ávatory.pdºpov getáAAwv] Suidas, s. v. dypd-

ºf TToº! 2 XD. OTT Cº-
eſt] Cºxº Čº NJ Qoeſe ſojº
enjºxel fit Cº-Cº
X3, Fre-ins ºf CYCérôme
+trºscºſo.T(ex-JTſº
ºxer ocºtoxrïttººes
cºetºolsTrºgorº
2 e.g. onºcºrroTrø tº
YTUOTCONJ2 JKºſº
TºxecTV TOYC tº
boyſ-ooºººo tºº
OYAxeſ 2\\SY eſ. 29 NOY
Ayloxycºſ' ºtº-
Procrº- OYTo
tº TU KF2TOY Cº-º-º-T2.7-
yokºro ſtºº N}cº, C
et JToc Torº, º Poº
Feſºx tº Or J Cyfif
F: xerox ºf Tri-
e; H, Jºe Teixº Jº
Tororſ (Novº • Tºº
CX exo~T-i-To crºſſ”
TToxº O2-62s JNJ2-foº
Yºſtějooserſ 2. Koch’s
+, ×, NT’ ºf 9 NJ
+++)-rroyº T ºf
C’ſ) Jit jerse 2. K_
-Ho Y axe-r-23-2-ox. 23°
QºSco) 2-lº2-cTºº C Y
~ſt to CT. CTOY">Turo
fon YTo CX6-UCI CXT 3
* xeſton JTec:32Turcº
-j-O. Yºyog erºs cºcº
ſºloisetºrſoººº-
XO N tºo-rituay Tith
tor, cI coxcºriº
spºº"
cxxJ K2GTTTN, YTCO2+)"
TrojJcPrx Cºyoyº
-Fºxcrciſº. 2499 C&N
ºrp, F2 toº. 2, Kº'ºro
Sºo 23 ſtroTºroºººº
Xixº cºxº~" º
Koru Nºyº ºr ſº *
K2. Tri cºſt ox ecos 3–
Tifo CO2-0) 3.J et-effeº
-rºund $ºzoNT***
XYººHN320NTOTTNº.
Tūj)\! ? It Topcº Č3 .
+ftcºrrecTo?” "
uojº K2 12×Cºo?
C23 SrecTOYCCK
GCT+T2-f Cº2-f
#2 crº on YoºTo"
c Tocºrto NTT CO:
(15)
28_\! K.P 2. Aoy cºn Xe] co,
KxxJ Tier-T, Ko Nixo~~
OCT CCTCTOT AP2Xrn
Cº-C32A2S] ko YTLoplcºs
K2CT-3, Y-ce-T ſitcºſtoxe-
CoCTIn NeºrºlorTſoc
O&ON, 2ONXOToo), s \exeſ
KXJTºru e; CTON, CT ºf
ºxrouotes; e. JT
TruTºo?-e: K2.3T.Co-º
Not A C ſoo)\JTCONT*
k2 JTIt c2, 23 recTºº
ºrce cºerºo
foºrtzovcº º
2 sºoºoefrºzoº”.
2-ypox.xx.cºorſtofoº
3 CITOY FOYCTL972 tº
XT[of] 2 NCNJTi iT oxº
Tº fºckºº-oºrºº
OT2 JN TX PTIN ºctºr
To KTAct 20 Nº) SP ctºº
cerºy Tito R.O.Y2. ceT2-
cº-Tº YTºº! (P2. Tº
**-Cſº ecº-fc-C2\R^
THE ORATION OF
Col. 44.
# Töv dAAotptov
3. as e/ V
étuffvueiv čo Te Töv
éyxeipno avta O"U KO-
zº, 3. V V
pavteſv avToys ev60s
\ /
mTſuwo av, Tó Trépºrtov
* /
pépos Töv Nºnſpov
y / a-
ow petabávºtes' Towto
5 V /
8', ei (30/Aet, Tô Tpany
wºrd Töv Šukao Tów
Tpax6év Tow égéA-
/ V *
6óvtos punvos Trós
3. / 5 /
ow ueya. Aov é7Taívov
3 /
&štáv ča-Ti ; phvav-
V /
Tos yap Avord vôpov to
p
’Etukpg|Tovs weta\-
Aov Towſ IIa)\Anvéd's
5 \ * /
€vTós Tóv uſét]pov
<\
Tetumuévov, 6 ip-
V 3/
yd (eTo uév #[6]n Tpta
ëTn uéteixov 3’ av-
Tow oi TAovo [t]º Tatou
/ zºº. : aº
a yeočv Tu Tôſvi év Tn
/
TóAet, 6 6é Aſſo-alvöpos
JTuo Xueſt[o Tpt]akóoria
Td Aavra eis [Tpóa oëo]v
Th TóAet. TooraúTa y]&p
eixnſpéval aſ VT6v Šk
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS, 15
Col. 45.
* y e/
Too MeToº?\\ovº d'AX 3-
e W 5
pºws oi ÖukaoTal (ow
\ V * /
Tpos Tas Tov Katmyo-
y
pov JToo Yéorets dro-
& / W V
{3\étrov.res dANd Tpós
\ / 3/
To 6tkatov) éyvoo'av
/ º V y
iölov etvai Tó Métax-
\ *A a /
Aov, ka? Th auth Nºn-
/ *
pºp tds Te ovarias autów
3. / f
év do paxeig katéo Tn-
\ \ e /
orav kai Tiju J7tóAot-
5 / *
Tov epyao lav Tov pe-
3. /
TáAAov éðeſłatwo-av.
Touyapotiv ai katvoto-
/ 5
pital TpóTepov čkAé-
p V V /
Aeluptéval oud Töv på-
{3ov viv čvepºyo Uvtat]
- \ * / e
kai Tris TróAetos at
/ e 3. *
Tpóoroëot ai ékeiðev
/ * 3/ <\
Taxu aſſovtat, &s é-
p /
Avuñvav Tó Tuveſs]
* e /
Töv 6ntópov čáſatral-
A \ *
Tiſo avºres Töv 37-
plov kal 6ao poxſoyń]-
o'avtes Toijs ék[Aoyeſs].
éat, yap, 6 ávepſes êt-
\ 3. * 3/
kaoTal, oux oëTos [ćpt]-
Col. 46.
V V
pukpa boys TAeto
V V 5
{3\dºttet Td Kouvé, ow8’
e/ 3. V as
oa-Tus eus To Tapaxpn-
9 5 N / /
Ma Čš doikov Tropio as
Aſ * P
kaTeXvore Tns To)\e-
V 5 y /
ws Tºv čk ducatov Tpéo-
e/ y
očov, dAA’ 67-4, Méxet
* > w 3/
kai Tôv eis Töv Štret-
/ f
Ta Xpévov dºpeAiuov
* y V ass e
Tú TóAel kai Tris opio-
votas Tóv Toxtºrtov
* / *
ka. The 86&ns Tns
/ º /
Juétépas, dºv čvuot
5 / 5
ow ºppovtſovo.uv d'A-
\ *
Ad Töv ćpyašopévov
3. / /
dºpaipoupévot Tópovs
\ /
ºpaqi Tovtovs Tropičeuv,
3. / 3. * /
atoptav ev Tn TróAet
Tapao-keväçovtes'
ôtav yap fivt poſłepov
Tô KTāq-6al kai petóe-
orðat Tís 6ovXhore:Tat
T Towſ-
V ^ 3/
Tovs prev ovv to ws
f
kuvövveiſelv ;
3. e / p 3. *.
ow 636tóv éo-Tu ka?\0-
a f .
oral TaüTa Tpdºttetv, Ü-
Meſs 38, 6 &vöpes 31ka-
/ e/
a Tos Toxirns éſortis]
Kſ, (x). -
Col. 44. I. 3. MS. évyetpno avta.-l. 5. Ms. mTwo av.–l. 8. MS. Tpoinv a stroke being drawn through the ot.—l. 20, MS. etni-
1. 24. MS. vºteig Yvetto. Col. 45. 1. 5. MS. ańa.—l. 15. MS. ekAe|Appreval.—l. 20. MS. avčovitat.
\ 5. * y 3. P
‘pov MetáA\ov číkm. Oi Tà apyvpeia uétax\a épyašćuevo,
c/ p ~ x/ 2/ \ y Aº
âtrov 30% owto Kawow ºpyov āpāaabat, ‘pavepov ćTotovuto
* p e * / 3.
Tois ét éketvots Tetayuévois Utrö Tov ëhuov, Kai dTeypd-
* * * p V Aſ ev
‘pov to Tov Texeiv &veka Tº Shuº eikoa Tiju Tetaptny Tow
* > º > CN / y 3. p
kavoo wetáAAov. et ris obv č86ket Xà0pa épydgeabat pie-
Tax\ov, Töv um diroypayáuevov čáñv Tó BovXouévy Ypd-
peoffat kal éAéyxeiv. Pollux mentions the rare word
avatóypaqos, Lib. IX. c. 5, Tó TeXoſaevov trap at Tów
TeXów dToypaſp#' To 8é ur, dToypapév dvatórypa pov.
See Böckh's Dissert, on the Silver Mines of Laurion (Publ.
Econ, of Athens, Appendia. Vol. II. pp. 478, 9. Engl.
Transl.)
Col. 44. l. 13. phvavros K.T.A..] When Lysander had
laid an information (pda'is) against the mine of Epicrates, of
the township of Pallene, that the cuttings had been worked
beyond the boundaries, &c. In a clause of a vöuos aeta\-
Xukös, preserved by Demosthenes, we learn that a Śākm ae-
* •N º e 3. / •N
Tax Atki) would lie, &v Tūqºn Tis, &v Š.TAa étiq6pm, du
y A * / ? p \ /
etrukatateuvn Tov werpov evtos. Demosth. Tpós ſlavtatu.
p. 977 (Reiske), where Wolf falsely conjectured Škrós. “ev-
Tós appears, like the citra of the Romans, to mean both
inside and outside, according as the spectator adopts his
station, as Herodotus (III, 116) says, Čvºrós dirépyovrat :
they exclude without in reference to us, but within in refer-
ence to the countries which exclude. Thus, étruca Taréuvety
évros Tóv uérpov, means to cut outside your own boundaries,
but inside the boundaries of those whose property is in-
vaded.” Böckh (as above) p. 483, note. The boundaries
were also sometimes transgressed, by working into the sup-
ports (ktoves aegokpwéis), which were necessary for the
safety of the mines. See Pseudo-Plut. Wit. X. Oratt, (Lycurgus.)
l, 23. 686 Aſa'avópos Uttaxveiro] The construction of
this sentence is not quite regular, though the sense is plain.
The more exact construction would have been privavros ydp
Čukaa Tal
I can find nothing out about Lysander or
Avodvºpov K.T.A. kai intoaxouévov K.T.A. oi
ðuws R.T.A.
Epicrates. *:
Col. 45. l. 7, 8tov] Not his own absolutely, for the
mines were state property; but that he was entitled to keep
the ore which he had worked, and to go on working: the
mine would seem to have been entered in the state accounts
in his name solely, although there were other joint proprie-
CT Co cºſt ºf Kºº, 229 º'
Roxxo (CCCC޺ KXTºw
Tº Tox, Toºwºº
etc., rºus cºcº
Tºº On Toohºº & Y-5 °2
Nºrtſ too Rottetour
Rºjºurt ºf 12-ſtree n°
e Turſivrºnx ºri oºzºº
NJocºs \coſ K29 Cºlºſ
Te?-l stroix-rrºº
Nyorº cºrker-oxocº
CºſtNG > N ×JºJ 30 Tft ſº-
PXTCYCN oxy-orced ſix
- cº-ºf-rejº" KX-l
J (fo a roy ſolº Tºº
To YK2C tº Topo YTPOTie"
+truejºtoxexxx ºn
ºf city-Tºkºrº F237°
ſtoxº~YKroc X-erciº
ºxyrtT2 x ſ \cºſ 2-Tooiet)
Jºss ºf Too, 2 on N 2 Juoſº
Xºrºtºxxº~2-xxſºon
Tº K2 12×105? ex-CTV2-ſº-
JCSNJTº 2. Nyrſt XT[f 2′ſ
Toºroº Tºtº
Hºx of Dºº et”
CYN ºf ºxy e-ejºy ITVCz
TLo Neº CT N ×c trut rx__. NJToº F 2 ºxſº-
2-rociº-Tº-Poº- vºſtºs ºjºucº º-ſº "?"
Aasraepºrtivº3-6 tº ºr eſcºrcº º
NJ rſt TTON] cº isos ojºſon- c1 cº-
2 º'ceº Arrotſi tº -Itko N K*ITO)ºr KON
-foot ºf T & N OTforſtø I -For-Hºº & T sº Nº.
ºrcyca, exporº
Xtre+ceixy on coykőrſ
-T-1.JPt-to-2 cº, 2-ºl Toof-tºº-oº! 2: ºº
-JOYvºrnº C2 Tºº Tº esºcºſ tº cy JT6 -
YTI trf cº-ror NT-CA Knº Xuxe Kºrſør. Noº
Aoyº, JYº 2s exº-h cke-Haytex, o, orf20N
jºovebrecºveº Sº urº 20 krº sºlº
Tº ſoon rrºsore&C K2 Jero?Kołº CTN2
Čſº Hºpe J20 2. Sºong Tomofºrº cºyº
errºexºserſ C-robau enjoº Coſ Cºſ
J. CNI PTT e.g. c-Rof 16+7
K20 Cx & 12(ON X-0; Toº
T(or ºf Toºrcrºſſºſºvº
2 ccT12 ºf Cº-Tº-
++x, Treji YNTA®
Afºx) cºrreſ.) ºf
2.99 ex: cºſt ſtºrſ tº 2N KACT ºxº K.A. iTu Ye
- º
+-2-n a 12-4 ºr
ºx. 848>
fººt-'exº's RP2
2^^CTſº Ttools, Tºp! º .
Trroºt SYRCrºſs *"
7 YTI efºre’s 1ſt Itºi
bºrº Kft.ccº. OT2 JN
Jº-fºx e^^{(Tees >99 ºf CA-ſ x Cº.
2\p e Cº- Kºciº-, 2-, 3-ft. º POC
12 e-cox, Keºcºrerº 2 .. N
( 16)
º



THE ORATION OF
Col. 47.
-- / \ 3/
ortal, do-Trep kai &\\ovs
\
7roXXoys area aſkate
Töv TroXttöv doika's
* f
eis dyſovas katao Tøv-
c/ V 3.
Tas oi/To kai Evže-
/ /
yttrºrº (3om6ho ate,
\ A / 3. V
kai puri TeputónTe avTov
P 5
éti Tpdypiatt ovée-
\ 3 ºr e / \ 3.
yos d'Étºp kai eioray-
- / / * 5 /
'yexíg Totavtn iſ ov pºd-
5 3/ / 5
vov ovK evoxos é-
3. \ V 5 V
o-Tuv, d\\c kai avTri Ta-
\ A / \
pó, Toijs vópovs éa Tiv
> / \
eio'n'y'yeXpwévn Kal
f º *
Tpós Towtous JT' at toº
*A / /
Tov Katmyopov Tpotov
\ 3. /
Tuva dToMe?\vpuévil"
* 3 / V 3. *
eto-miyye)\ke 'yap avTów
/ f
IIoAwevkTos Aé'yetv
V \ 3/ * ên
Man Ta apto-Ta Tºp on-
* - f
pig, Tó 'Affnvatov,
- A /
Xphuata Aaw84vov-
• V
Ta kai Öapeds trapd
* 3. /
Twy TavavTua Tpat-
/ * P
Töv Tov Tó Smug,
HYPERIDES FOR EUXENIPPUS, - 16
Col. 48.
/ \ 5
TróAetos Tuvas ſitt-
* º * \
& To eival, Tap' div Tó.
e- > y y
86pa eixnq6ta Eváč-
/
vu"TTov orvvaywut-
3. * 3. 5\ 3.
Çeo-0at avToſs, fiv čv at-
* 5 * /
Tº eiteſv ŠTi étrel-
\ 3. - /
ôm éketvows ovk Šo Tu
/ a-
Tiptophoraq-6at 3et
V 2. f V
Toys évôděe avToys
Jºrnpetovytas Šíknv
* a- \
êoûval' vöv Šē 'Affn-
/ W 3.
vatous pnotiv eival,
> º \ \
Tap' 6v Ta's Öopeds
2 - / 5 /
eiànºpéval C&R/T Oly.
º V 3/ es
eita ori) éxov čv Tn
/ \ . V e
7ToAel Toys wiztevav-
/ - *
Tía Todtºrov't as Tó
/ 5 a-
ëhuq) ov Tupuapm,
5 3. /
d'AA' Evževittº Tpd-
4
/
yuata Tapéxels. 8pa-
\ A > \ \
Xī) 6é Tu eitrów Tepi
* / º e *
The Nº fighov is jueſs
* y
MéA\ete pépetv
f t/
kata/3moropav' &Tav
Col. 49.
e - V f
Juiv Töv yſplappatéa
z- y
J7tavayvöval Třív
5 y *
Te eio'ayyeXtav kai Tov
/ \ 3.
vópov Tóv €torayye?\-
\ \ W e/
Tukov kal Tov opkov
V e f \
Töv m)\tao-Tukóv. kai
V V A. & /
Tovs puév Adºyovs diſtav-
* /
Tov intov dºpéAe-
3. A a". 3.
Te, ék 6é Tns eta-ayye-
/ \ * y
Ātas kai Tøv vſjudov
f t/ 5\
orkey, duevo & Ti &v
t z- * /
July 60km 6tratov
kai eiſopkov eivat
e- /
Towto lºng to ao 66.
3. \ \ º V 2
éyò Mév owy oroi, Ev-
f /
£évitzre, 3e3ontºn-
t/ 3. \
ka Šara eixov' \outdv
5 \ * a-
6' éo"Ti čelo'6at Töv
* V
êukaa-Töv kai Toys
y *
‘ptAovs TapakaAetv
W \ y 3. /
kai To Tatēta diva/343d-
Çeo 6al.
YITEP EYEENITITIOY
* V
Tū ‘A6mvatov et uéu
oùv é:06ev Tris
yöp uéAAnte, 6 áv- EIXAITTEAIAX
Öpes dukaoTal, 6taylºn- AFIOAOTIA IIPOX
‘pigeo 6al, ke^eūete, TIOAYEYKTON.
*Nº.
Col. 47. l. 4. MS. sadºravitas-l. 9. MS. agabad–l 10. MS. roavºnºv–1. 20. MS. ānſawi. Col. 48. I. 5. MS. mº, the
s being cancelled.—l. 18, MS. Telpop.m. Col. 49. l. 14. MS. Tov to to lºng to aortal the to having a line drawn through it, and two dots
being placed above.—l. 21, Ta Tatēta.
illegible.
tors, or rather fee-farmers. See Böckh (as above.)
1. 14. KauvoToutall The openings of the new veins. This
is the primary meaning of the word, and this sense is
intended by Pollux (Lib. III, c. 11) : peta\\elſew, Spºttetv,
étucaratéuvely, katu, Toueiv, katvorouta. At the same time
it would not, perhaps, be easy to produce another passage from
an Attic writer where it is used in the same sense, though we
have Kaivorouéiv in Xenophon, in his Vectigalia, (c. 4.) ana-
logously employed more than once, tº 37ta, pain &v ris,
ow kal vov, datep ºutpoa bev, ToMAoi Kaivorouotat; 67t
Tevéa Tepot uév etaw of Tept to géta\\a vegati yop
Taxw kataakevd (ovtat: kivövvos 36 wéyas Tø KO. II/OTO-
uouvrt, 6 uév ydp eipov dyadºv épyaatav TAoûotos yt y-
vetai o 88 ań eupºv Tövta diróA\vatv, 6a'a du Satavian–
Kalvo Touta is in general metaphorically taken for “a novelty,”
or “the making of an innovation : ” in the latter sense by
Plato, De Legg. (Tom. II. p. 715. Ed. Steph.) toºs & ap-
xovtas Āeyouévows vºv witnpétas Tois vóuois ékóNega, oùtt
Kawotoutas 6vouárov čveka d\\ mºovaal Tavròs uáA\ov
º W e-
€ivat Tapd Towto got mptav Te TóAet kal Towvavtſov. Polyb.
This is the correction of the scribe: the original word is so completely cancelled as to be
Lib. xxxv, c. 2. § 8. §toiuous Távºras Tpós Kalvotoutav
Herodian. Lib. II, c. 28. (p. 63, Ed. Par) piſast
* w Aſ 3/ 3. P .* *
T6 kov pov TO Xipov éðvos és katvoroutay Te Töv kaflearnkó-
/
Trotmotovolt.
Tov čtvrméetov: in the former signification by Polyb. Lib. 1.
c. 23. § 10. Katat)\ayévres Tāv Kawotoutay toº ovuòat-
$f 3.
Synes. Ep. LVII. pepov dx\d êvonvida tos Tºv
Chrysost. Homil. in Rom. i. (Tom. Ix.
p. 431. ed. Benedict.) éteiðr, 38 Kawotoutav čvskáAovy ºrg
/ § / y \ p t y •N \
Tpdyuatt &sikvvauv auto Tpeaſºtepov EAA#vov čv Kal
3. * - * P
év Tots Tpopntais Tpoëlaypaſpöuevov,
1901)TOS.
f * P
Ratporopitcty Tov (3tov.
l. 24. 8agaokoymaavtes Tow's ék\oyers] ea torting money
from the collectors of the public revenues. See Böckh, Publ.
Econ, of Athens. Vol. II, pp. 52, 375 (Engl. Transl.)
Col. 46. l. 19. tºwt| Read .
Col. 47. l. 5. Evčevſtarºj From the preceding obser-
vations, it seems likely that Euxenippus possessed property
in the mines, and was accused of having been guilty of fraud
in the management of them.
Col. 48. l. 9, attoºs] Probably we should read attoºs.
l, 18. Tipºpſil See note on Col. 25. l. 9.
INDICES.
INDEX OF PROPER NAMES.
The numbers refer to the Columns of the MS.
AcAMANTIS, 29
AEgeis, 26
Agesicles, 19
'A'ypvX76ev, 48
Alexander (of CEum), 26
(K. of Macedon), 31
Amphiaraus, 29
Anaea, 18
Antidorus, 19
Archestratides, 2
Ariston, 1
Aristophon (the Azenian), 38
Athenians, 18, 21, 22, 23, 26, 28, 32,
34, 39, 42, 43, 47, 48
Athens, 15, 37
Attica, 31
Azenian, 38
Callistratus, 18
Charippus, 3, 6, 11
Delphi, 28
Demotion, 41
Diognides, 19
Dione, 35, 36
Diopeithes the Sphettian, 39
Dioxippus, 5
#
Dodona, 35, 37
Dodonaean, 35
Epicrates, (the Pallenian), 44
Euphemus, 11 •
Euphraeus, 5
Euthycrates, 43
Euxenippus, 17, 19, 25, 27, 29, 30,
31, 32, 34,35, 38, 40, 42,47, 48, 49
Hagnusian, 39
Halimusians, 19
Hellenes, 5, 32.
Hephæstia, 14 $.
Heracles, (see corrigenda), 6
Hippothoontis, 29
Hygieia, 31
Lemnos, 14, 15
Leosthenes, 18
Lycophron, 16
Lycurgus, 3, 26
Lysander, 44 i. s.
Macedonia, 32
Macedonians, 32
Molossian, 36
GREEK INDEX.
Myrina, 14
Nausicles, 43
CEum, 26
Olympias, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37
Oropus, 29
Pallenian (of the Athenian deme), 44
Philip (K. of Macedon), 89
(an Athenian citizen), 48
Philo (of Anaea), 18
Philocles, 41
Philocrates (the Hagnusian), 39
Piraeus, 19
Polyeuctus, 17, 20, 24, 37, 42, 47, 49
N.B. The words to which a dagger is prefixed do not occur in the Lexicons: those which have an asterisk are hardly to be
found in any other Attic writer in the sense in which Hyperides uses them.
y /
d6dvaros ovkopóvrms, 3
> P
*āvatórypaqa uéta\\a, 48
3. /
*āºroXav6civea'6al, 8
* 3/ \ y/ * f
āptotos (T6 &plotov Tow Tpdy-
Tos), 2
3. /
*avroteNés ºf piqua, 28
8tattav Aaffeiv, 41
êlé@opa, 30
8tapvXáttew, 3
ék\oyers, 45
> W e/ * *
étriottiguóv (Čatep rois Ana Tais
&
/
Štóóval), 2
épé8tov, 31
itTotpoſpeiv, 13
*ka0éataka, 38
*kawotouta, 45
kakós eièéval, 42
Kepax) (GT kepax.jv statpd trew
Töy uta'66v Twi), 14
papyttys, 6
Mérpov (€vtós Töv uérpov Té-
pºvetv), 44
un ow (see notes), 20
Sestos, 18
Sphettian, 39
Theoctistus, 2
Theophilus, 16
Theotimus, 18
Timomachus, 18
Tisis (6 A'ypvX76ev), 48
Zeus, 35
t W
6tatpukov, 23
*otmaa, 8 -
ôTws, joined with 1 aor. act.
subj., 3
s f
opeakógos, 4
*g platºs, 29
*Tponym Tris, 4.
firpoo'yvuvaatifs, 5
Tpoa to Tao'6a, 18
firpoakatauávetv, 14
oxotmaav, 42
Tpayw8ta, 10, 37
Lately published in Quarto, sewed, Price 6s. 6d.
The Oration of Hyperides against Demosthenes, respecting the Treasure of Harpalus.
The Fragments of the Greek Text, edited from the Facsimile of the MS. discovered at Egyptian Thebes in 1847;
together with other Fragments of the same Oration cited in Ancient Writers.
and Notes, and a Facsimile of a portion of the MS.
With a Preliminary Dissertation
By CHURCHILL BABINGTON, M.A. Fellow of St John's
College, Cambridge. London: J. W. Parker, and G. Bell. Cambridge: J. Deighton, and Macmillan and Co.
Oxford : J. H. Parker. 1850.
A copy of Mr Harris' facsimile of the newly-discovered
MS. was placed in the hand of Mr Churchill Babington, Fellow
o St John's College, Cambridge, and the beautiful specimen
of Calligraphy, whose title is quoted at the commencement
of this article, shews that Mr Babington was excellently
adapted to be the depositary of so valuable a document. It
is a reprint of the fragment in a Greek type, which is the
nearest approximation to the real characters of the MS. that
the University Press at Cambridge can supply, with conjec-
tural restorations, when the original letters are mutilated or
erased, in red characters: the whole accompanied by the
Greek text in the ordinary characters, for the use of those
who wish to consult the sense of the fragment without the
labour of decyphering the more unusual type. We must
confess ourselves to be of the number of those who have
experienced considerable relief from such an arrangement.
A Preliminary Dissertation is prefixed, in two parts. The
former, which is of less interest to general readers, shews
from internal evidence that the MS. probably dates between
the termini of the third century B.C. and the third century A.D.
The second portion of the dissertation is devoted to the proof
that the fragment is part of Hyperides’ oration against De-
mosthenes. And this certainly seems to be made out from
quotations by the lexicographers Harpocration, Photius, and
Suidas, of a passage and expressions which appear therein,
though the latter two may probably, as Mr Babington ac-
knowledges, be resolved into the authority of the first. * * *
Great credit is certainly due to the Editor for the skill he
has displayed in filling up the lacunae of the fragment, even
in those cases when the rubrical appearance of the restored
text shews that there has been occasion to draw largely upon
the imagination. * * * To the mass of scholars the name of
Hyperides is scarcely known—except to mispronounce : for
the penultimate syllable is, contrary to first impressions, a
long one. Yet he was one of the Ten Orators whose biogra-
phies are given by Plutarch in his Moralia, and one of the
most distinguished in the anti-Macedonian interest at Athens.
Plutarch tells us that he is said to have excelled all his com-
petitors in public speaking, and that some preferred him to
Demosthenes. Cicero lauds his ‘acumen’ (Orat. iii. 7)—his
subtlety of language (Brut. 17)—Quintilian (x.1) characterises
him—‘ dulcis imprimis, et acutus Hyperides.' * * * Maetzner
(the editor of Dinarchus) thinks it not improbable that in
the affair of Harpalus, Hyperides impeached Demosthenes to
screen his own delinquencies. And this consideration brings
us to the especial object which we have in view: the question
whether the greatest orator the world ever saw, did on one
occasion so far forget himself and his better principles, as to
accept a bribe from the embezzler of Alexander's treasure.
Mr Babington with justifiable pride remarks that the frag-
ments of Hyperides’ oration must for the future form part of
the materials for such an investigation. We shall have occa-
sion before long to examine what practical bearing they have
upon the subject.—Christian Remembrancer.
Executed with the greatest possible care and with great
judgment, as far as we can see.—English Review.
Mr Babington, in his able preliminary dissertation, traces
in the formation of the letters * * * a still greater resem-
blance to exist with the “Codex Bankesianus” of Homer,
discovered in Upper Egypt. Many other MSS. appear to have
been compared by the learned Editor with a view to deter-
mine the date of these fragments; but this scrutiny has not
been confined to the mere calligraphy, but has extended to
the orthography. * * * Mr Sharpe considers the MS. to be-
long to the age of the Ptolemies, in which supposition Mr
Babington entirely concurs. * * * We must however refer the
reader to a perusal of the work, the cheapness of which is not
its least recommendation, and in the completion of which the
Editor may congratulate himself on the success of his
labours.-Church of England Quarterly.
Ably edited.—Literary Gazette.
Among the efforts of eloquence by which Hyperides se-
cured for his name a place among the Ten Orators of the
Alexandrian Canon, none possessed a greater interest at the
time, or is of greater importance as a historical document,
than the famous oration which procured the conviction of
Demosthenes on a charge of bribery and his consequent
banishment. Hitherto this splendid specimen of oratory had
to be reckoned among the lost treasures of classical antiquity,
and the present is but a partial recovery of the text. All
however that learning and industry could accomplish in turn-
ing the discovery of the papyrus of Thebes to account has
been done by the learned Editor of these fragments, who has
entitled himself to the gratitude both of the students of his-
tory and philologists, by the elaborate manner in which he
has placed his materials before the public.—John Bull.
In vielen Punkten triftt Hr. Churchill Babington mit seinen
Vorgângern zusammen, anderwärts haben die deutschen Bear-
beiter das Richtigere getroffen, aber es giebt auch Stellen,
wo die Restitution des englischen Herausgebers Beachtung
verdient.—Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft.
Zur Erläuterung der Bruchstücke haben Hr. Böckh und
Sauppe in ihren Anmerkungen wichtige Beiträge gegeben.
Hr. Babington beschränkt sich meistens auf Parallelstellen die
er flessig Zusammengetragen hat.—Neue Jahrbücher für Phi-
lologie, &c. von M. J. C. Jahn.
NON
CIRCULATING
i
3 9015
RSITY O
Illilill


º º
W º wº
º tº . . . .
º, \
º
§ º
e \
º ºº:: A
W . º * º
§ \\
º º §
º , W sº \\\\\\ º sº
sº
\\\\\\ \\ Wºy W\"\\
º § s º i. \ \ & º º
. * * * - -
A\ ,
\ , , ;
Vº t
\\
ºr W
§§ wº . - W
W \ - \ º
- º wº
º
º §\\ W w sº W \\
º §
º º
º º W
º §
º
W * .
W
; § §
A\\\\\\\
W
tº W º
Aſ - º . -
\\
\
- \\ wº - § w W . y
W *
§
WºWAWW) \\
\\ . . \\ \ !" W . º $º \\\\\ \\ W
WºW \\\\\\\\\
º
tº º W \\\\\\\
W § º
\\ m . . wº. \\\\
W
º º N W
! i; § sº
N
W § - ºW \
Nº. ſ
§
\\\\\\\
A
§
º
º
\
\ | C
Wº
\ \
\
Nº.
W \\ \ \
WºW \
w W \\
A \ \
\ \\ A\\\\\\\\\\ .
Wº º \ \\
*...
\
\,. º