•Ni^ \J W^, U iW., ^-.v^/ i« V^. ^ v^ ,^.:^^*',-v. v-^:m !v^wr'«Q^W'^^""'^ 1 ■\J 'V) r ^ Wf P- ^ .^. - -'^H ;iv,.^, ¥'WL ^ VV;^N^!' 'v^w'^^^^ry'^:^^''^ i^xf'f ^f F /:s^ I ■tfK: ^' M/3cell^neoMsrPc:^mp Val , n IS AN I > EARNEST APPEAL TO THE FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND O^ THE SUBJECTS OF ITS ECONOMICS. REt. THOMAS^CHALMERS, D. D. Piincipal and Professor of Divinity in the New College, Edinburgh, and Corresponding Member of ihe Rojal Institute of France. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BV THE AMERICAN EDITOR. FIRST AMERICAN FROM THE SECOND EDINBURGH EDITION. PHILADELPHIA: PRESBYTERIAN BOARD OF PUBLICATION. 1847. CONTENTS. Page Introduction to the American Edition, 5 Preface, 15 Original Preface, 17 Economics of the Free Church of Scotland. Section I. On the Contributions for the Support of the Free Church,. • • 19 II. On the Financial Committee, 27 III. IV. On the Distribution of the Sustentation Fund 31 V. On Church Extension, 41 VI. General View of the Schemes and Objects of the Church, 44 VII. General Considerations, 47 Affendix. No. I. On the Importance op the Free Church Ministers giving their Testimony and their Countenance in behalf of the Associa- tion. See. I. § 2 49 II. On the Possibility of supporting a Church, even of National Magnitude and Extent, by the Contributions of the Middle and Lower Classes, Stc. I. § 5, ^ 50 III. On the Offerings of the Common People, Sec. I. § 6 52 IV. The Stability of our Means lies more in the Smaller Contri- butions OF the many, than in the Larger Contributions of the few. Sec. I. § 8, 53 V. On certain requisite Modifications by which our present Sys- tem OF AN equal Dividend might be improved. Sec. III. and IV., §2 54 VI. On the Character and Prospects of a Church indifferent to the Moral and Religious State of the Outfield Popula- tion. Sec. III. and IV., § 7, 56 VII. On Scales of Distribution. Sec. III. and IV., § 15, 56 VIII. Fear lest the Work of Church Extension should be misman aged or neglected, IX, On the Prospects of Voluntaryis.m Sec VII. § 2 ... • • 61 X. Conclusion — The Author's View of what should be the State of the Church's outward Business for the following 59 twelvemonth, 62 ADYEETISEMENT. The Board of Publication believe that tliey are performing an important service for tlie Pre'sbyterian Clmrcli in re-pub lisliing this pamphlet. The topics Dr. Chalmers here dis- cusses with his characteristic ability and energy, are, mutatis mutandis^ of no less moment to our Church than they are to the Free Church of Scotland. This will be sufficiently evi- dent to every candid reader of the able and interesting Intro- duction prefixed to the present edition. A copy of the pamphlet will be sent, through the liberality of a friend, to each of the ministers in our connexion. The Board are unwilling to believe that such seed is to be scat- tered through the Church in vain. They are convinced that ♦the subjects here presented, demand the most serious atten- tion of our ministers and people, and that they should be dis- cussed until some measures shall be devised and adopted at once to augment the liberality, zeal, and efficiency of our Church, and to promote the comfort and usefulness of her ministers. The manaofement of the Economics of the Church is vested in its Judicatories. With their functions this Board has no wish to interfere. It is not its province even to sug- gest specific modifications of existing plans. Its office sim- ply is to diffuse light, leaving it to the Church herself, under ADVERTISEMENT. the guidance of God's Providence and Spirit, to use the light thus disseminated as she may see fit. It is taken for granted that many of those into whose hands this Appeal may fall, will be disposed to examine its facts and reasonings in their application to our own affairs, and to lay their views before the churches. If in any instances individuals should choose to send their com- munications to this Board, the Board will with pleasure receive them, and dispose of them in such a manner as may in their judgment be best adapted to promote the ends con- templated in the circulation of this pamphlet. INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION The disruption of the Ciiurcli of Scotland, the simultaneous secession of four hundred and seventy of her ministers, and of a still larger pro- portion of her members; the sacrifice by the clergy of an abundant and secure income; the cheerful assumption by the people of the bur- den of sustaining their own Church, and of creating all the necessary appliances for that purpose, presented an example of fidelity, of self-denial, and of energy, which has few parallels in history. This spectacle has fixed the attention of the Protestant world, and is exerting an influence, the results of which it is difficult to foresee or estimate. When the Free Church withdrew from the Establishment, it had. every thing to do, and to do at once. 1. Churches were to be erected in every parish. 2. Provision was to be made for the support of the ministry. 3. All the missionary and other benevolent operations of the Church were to be taken up and carried on, 4. Parochial schools were to be established. 5. Manses were to be provided for the pastors. 6. A college was to be organized and sustained. Some of these objects demanded a strenuous effort once for all, and they were taken up and disposed of in order. First, collections were made for the building of churches. This work was prosecuted with so much vigour that within three years and a half after the dis- ruption not less than £400,000 sterling, or ^1,800,000 have been expended in erecting from five to seven hundred churches. Then ^250,000 were raised for parochial schools. Then, in the space of eight months, ^500,000 were collected for building manses. Then, or even before, ^100,000 were obtained for a college, designed prin- cipally as a theological seminary. 2 6 INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. Important as were these several objects, they were still secondary to those which made a permanent demand on the Cinirch. Of these tlie most pressing was the support of the ministry. The principle adopted was, that every minister who left the Establishment, should receive an equal sum from a common fund, which sum the congre- gation to which he ministered might increase by voluntary contribu- tions, at discretion. In some places the amount received from the common fund would be adequate to the support of the pastor; in other places it would be entirely insufficient. Every congregation, therefore, after contributing to the general fund, was left at liberty to do what they saw fit for the support of their own minister. To carry out this plan, associations were organized in every parish. The business of these associations is to make collections for the sustenta- lion fund. This is done by districting the parish, and appointing a collector in each district, whose duty it is to apply to every member within his bounds for his weekly or monthly contribution. The pro- ceeds of these collections are remitted to Edinburgh, and twice a year a dividend is declared. To supplement these salaries, collec- tions are made every Sabbath at the door of the churches, the pro- ceeds of which are given to the pastor. The result has been that every pastor has received from the general fund a salary varying from £100, to £140. It will be seen from the following pamphlet, that Dr. Chalmers is alarmed at the operation of this plan of equal distribution, which he says fosters the spirit of giving as little, and getting as much as pos- sible. He insists strenuously that the rule should be adopted of the congregations •' getting as they give." One proposition is, that every pastor shall receive from the sustentation fund, one and a half limes as much as his congregational association contributes to that fund. If the association contributes £50, the pastor receives £75; if it contributes £60, he receives £90; and so on until the stipend amounts to £150, beyond which nothing is to be given from the general fund. The reasons for this modification will be found in the pamphlet. After providing for the support of her own ministers, the next most pressing duty of the Free Church, was the prosecution of her benevolent operations. As all the missionaries connected with the Established Church, took part with the seceding portion, on that por- tion was devolved at once the burden of sustaining all the enterprises in which the v/hole Church had been engaged. These benevolent operations are divided into several departments, called schemes, each having its own committee of superintendence and management. These are, Educatiou, Foreign Missions, Domestic Missions, Conver- sion of the Jews, Colonial Churches. The general plan of raising funds for these several schemes, is to assign a particular day lor each, on which the collection is to be made simultaneously throughout the whole Cliurch. The plan or mode of making this collection seems to be left to the discretion of each congregation. There is a schedule in use in some congregations, which seems so simple and so well adapted to the purpose, that it may without impropriety be transfer- INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. 7- red from Appendix No II. to this place, to render it more prominent as a model. Rates of Contribntiou to the Fund. SCALE. PER WEEK. PER MONTH. PER QUARTER. 6. d. £ S. d. £ s. d. Rale, No. 1 » Rate, No. 2 . . . 1 4 1 Rate, No. 3 n 6 1 G Rate, No. 4 ... 2 8 2 Rate, No. 5 . . . . 3 1 3 Rate, No. 6 ... 6 2 6 Rate, No. 7.... 1 4 12 Rate, No. 8.... 2 8 1 4 Rate, No. 2 6 10 1 10 Rate, No. 10.... 3 6 14 2 2 Rate, No. 11.... 5 1 3 Rate, No. 12.... * On considering the above rates, I agree to give to the the sum specified in Rate No. — , for the year commencing at Martinmas, 1844, and request the Deacon or Collector to call for it each (Signature) * Rate No. 1 is left blank, to suit parties who may find that even the Rate, No. 2 is above their ability; and Rate No. 12 is also left blank, to suit parties whose circum- stances may enable them to give a higher Rate than any put down in the scale. Some members of the Free Church also give .£1 a week, some £2, some £4, and a few even more, to the fund. In proof of the efficiency of these plans and of the energy with which they are prosecuted, it is enough to say that the Free Church has raised in three years a million sterling, by annual contributions of upward of ^6300,000. It assumed at birth all the functions and responsibilities of a mature establishment. Six and thirty months have sufficed to form a society with all the appliances of self-support, instruction, and extension. A body whose existence dates no further back than 1S43, pays ^672,000 to its appointed ministers, provides for its widows and orphans, expends £9000 a year on its home mis- sions, and twice as much in building churches. It has a college with scholarships for poor students, with professors and tutors receiving salaries amounting to £4000 a year. It has its normal and general schools, probationers, catechists and travellers. It has six missions in India, six stations in Eastern Europe and Asia Minor for the con- version of the Jews. It has made grants amounting to near £2000 to the Evangelical Societies of Switzerland and Belgium, and the Bible Society of Toulouse and the Gustavus Adolphus Society of Germany. It provides for the temporary support of Hebrew con- verts in Hungary, and for Hindoo converts in Calcutta; supports missionaries with insured lives in South Africa, and has despatched a philosophical apparatus to the Great Fish River.* It is obvious that other churches must have much to learn from such a body. Our own church from its various points of contact and affinity with the Free Church of Scotland, may especially be * Condensed from no very friendly article in the London Times, September, 1846. g INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. expected to take an interest in her operations, and to be disposed to profit by her example. We have the same standards of doctrine and order. Our people have been trained under the same system of truth. We too are a self-sustaining and self-extending church. We have the same kind of work to perform both at home and abroad. What, therefore, a man so eminent and so long experienced in prac- tical matters, as Dr. Chalmers, has to say in his parting counsels to the Free Church, may well be expected to find attentive readers in this country. The republication of this pamphlet is to be referred to the conviction, that the principles here advocated are the very prin- ciples upon which we must act, if we would in any measure fulfil our destiny, or emulate the usefulness of a body much smaller in numbers, and much more limited in its resources than our own. There is indeed much in this pamphlet which has reference to the peculiar circumstances of the Free Church, but there is also much which as intimately concerns us as it does them. I. There are certain general principles which pervade all the prac- tical counsels of Dr. Chalmers, as they do the whole Bible. One is the universal brotherhood of believers; another is, the obligation which lies on every individual and every community to meet as far as possible, its own necessities. From the one principle flows the duty of bearing one another's burdens, of making the abundance of one a supply for the deficiency of others. 2 Cor. viii. 13, 14. From the other, flows the duty of self-support as far as it may be practica- ble. It is on the due adjustment of these two principles, the proper relative discharge of these two duties, that the well being of every community depends. If, on the one hand, the rich keep their abun- dance to themselves, multitudes of their brethren must perish. If, on the other, the poor rely upon the rich, without adequate exertion on their own part, the rich will soon weary of a liberality which they see to be productive of evil, or resources which ought to flow out to those who really need them, will be absorbed by those who would be better without such assistance. Dr. Chalmers makes a twofold application of these principles. First, he shows the impropriety of the poorer members of the Church devolving the duty of giving on their richer brethren. This is un- reasonable, because it is as much the duty of the poor to give accord- ing to their ability, as it is that of the rich to give accordmg to theirs. It is unwise, because the numerous small contributions of the poor, in all societies, amount to more than the large contributions of the rich. It is injurious, because it is doing the poor a great good, it is cultivating self-respect, self-denial, gratitude to God, and love to men, to call upon them to take their part in the great work of Christian benevolence. In the second place, he applies these principles to con- gregations. There always will be aid-giving and aid-receiving churches. There is a tendency in the one class to be backward or parsimonious in giving; and a tendency in the other, to rely upon aid from abroad, without making due exertion at iiome. lioth these evils are to be counteracted; the one by impressing on the stronger churches the duty of aiding their brethren; and the other, by urging INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. 9 on weak churches the duty of doing all they can for themselves. Hence the earnestness with which our author argues that all the benevolent operations of the Church should be conducted with the aim of increasing the number of the aid-giving, and of decreasing that of the aid-receiving congregations; making it the interest of the latter to assist themselves, by proportioning the amount received from abroad, to the sum raised at home. There is another general principle on which Dr, Chalmers very properly insists, and that is, the perfect consistency of real unity in the Church, both as to feeling and operation, without uniformity. All may be united, though all are not alike. There may be a gene- ral building fund, though all the churches are not of the same pat- tern. There may be a general fund for sustaining the ministry, though all salaries are not equal. It seems in Scotland many sup- pose that unity implies uniformity, and parity equality, not only in constitutional rights, but in external circumstances. Hence the at- tempt was made to prohibit the richer congregations building churches more expensive than a prescribed model; and to do away with the right of a congregation adding any thing to the salary its pastor received from the common fund. This our author argues betrays great ignorance of human nature. The money spent in ornament- ing a church, is not money taken from the building fund, but money which would never have found its way into the treasury of the Church. Money given to supplement the salary of a pastor, is not so much subtracted from the sustentation fund, but so much added to the comfort of the pastor, which would not otherwise have been given. In some congregations it was the custom to charge pew- rents. These in some cases were abolished, under the impression that the amount paid as rent, would be added in the form of increased contributions to the sustentation fund. The result was, the rents were lost, but the sustentation fund was not increased. The reason is plain. The rents were paid from one motive, and contributions were made to the sustentation fund from another motive. Taking off the pew rent had no more tendency to increase the contributions of the congregation, than a fall in the rent of houses. There is surely wisdom in all this, and it shows that the attempt to reduce every thing to a dead level in the Church or out of it, is just as im- practicable as to reduce all men to the same age, or to one uniform stature. There must be free scope left to the people to indulge all right feelings, while they are made to bear in mind that the Church is one, so that if one member sutler, all the members should suffer with it. II. The principles inculcated in this pamphlet bearing on the best method of raising funds, will be found as applicable to us, as to the Church in Scotland. The most obvious and important of these prin- ciples are the following: 1. The necessity of thorough organization. Every portion of the territory of the Free Church is brought within the limits of some association. These associations, organized by church officers, divide every parish into geographical districts, in each of which a collector *10_ INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. is appointed, whose duty it is to go over the ground at stated periods. This is so essential a part of the whole system, that Dr. Chalmers asks, Where should we have been, but for our associations? 2. The necessity of personal application to every member of the Church. Reliance is not placed on general collections in the Church. The name of every member in each district is obtained ; and the question is deliberately laid before his heart and conscience, What can you give to promote the cause of Christ? 3. The necessity of ministerial supervision and agency. Dr. Chal- mers records it as the result of his experience, that wherever the pas- tor takes an interest in these associations, and exerts himself to secure their efficiency, there the work is done; and he avows it as his conviction that wherever the plan has failed or languished, there the fault lies with the minister, and not with the people. 4. The necessity of a central committee to give uniformity and efficiency to the financial operations of the Church. This com- mittee should consist mainly of men of business, that is, of men familiar with accounts, rather than of professional men. With this must be connected a system of paid agencies. " There is," says Dr. Chalmers, " a prejudice, I had almost said a low-minded suspicion, on this subject, most grievously adverse to the enlargement of the church's resources and means. The sum of £2000 or £3000 a year, and perhaps more, rightly expended on the right men, would be re- munerated more than fifty fold by the impulse thus given to the mechanism of our associations." If this is the testimony of expe- rience in such a country as Scotland, any part of which can be reached in two days from the centre of operations, how much more necessary must be an efficient agency in our country, where every thing is so dispersed, that it is impossible thus easily to transmit an impulse or to secure co-operation. III. The support of the clergy. This is one of the most difficult and complicated practical questions which can engage the attention of the church. In this country we seem to think we have solved the prob- lem, by making every pastor dependent on his own immediate flock. This however is a very questionable matter. Our system, though it has its advantages, has its serious disadvantages. A system which secures the exclusive devotion of every minister to his official duties, is surely better than one which forces a large portion of the ministry to resort to some secular employment as a means of support. A system which secures to every man devoted to his work, an income adequate to his necessities, is certainly better than one which provides with lavish abundance for a few, and loaves the many to struggle with penury. The plan adopted in the Free Church has these advantages; ours labours obviously and to a lamentable extent under these disadvantages. This pamphlet brings up this subject. It will lead the reader to ask, whether nothing can be done to correct the evils under which our system labours. This is not the place to discuss this question, nor to follow out into its details any plan for meeting these difficulties. Ikit as the subject will suggest itself to every reader, it may not be improper to say what follows. INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. 11 If the church is one, it is just as much the duty of our wealthy congregations, to see that men preaching the gospel in Wisconsin or Iowa are supported, as that their own pastors are duly sustained. And if the Lord has ordained that they who preach the gospel should live by the gospel, — if the principle that the labourer is worthy of his hire, be of general and not of very restricted application, then does justice demand that every minister devoted to his work should be adequately supported. These are the two principles, viz. the unity of the church, and the "divine right" (i. e. a right founded on a divine ordinance) of every minister to a support, on which this whole subject rests, and according to which it ought to be adjusted. Nothing so chimerical as an equalization of salaries is of course intended. This would be both unjust and impracticable. Unjust, because an equal sum from a common fund would be a most unequal compensation, owing to the great diflerence of the expense of living in different places, and to the demands to which different ministers are subject. It would be impracticable, because if all ministers received the same salary from a common source, the people would still possess and exercise the right of adding to it what they pleased. All that is here asserted is, first, that every minister devoted to his work has a right to an adequate support; and second, that the obliga- tion to provide that support rests on the whole church, and not exclusively upon that portion of the church to whom the preacher ministers. If it be asked how these principles are to be carried out so as to accomplish the end in view, it may be answered that a great good will be obtained if the principles themselves be recognized as just, and the obligation to act in obedience to them be acknowledged. The best method of giving them effect may well call for the delibe- rate consideration of the wisest men of the church. The following suggestions are made in hopes of calling attention to the subject, and of ultimately leading to the adoption of some plan which may meet with general approbation. 1. Let the principle be adopted, that every man who devotes him- self to the work of the ministry, shall receive an adequate support. We act on this principle with regard to our foreign missionaries, why should we not do it with regard to those who preach the gospel at home? 2. Let the church appoint a " Sustentation Committee," to be composed principally of men of business, whose duty it shall be to raise funds for the support of the ministry, and to distribute them according to rules to be prescribed by the General Assembly. This committee ought perhaps to be estabhshed in New York, as the business centre of the country. 3. Let a maximum be fixed, beyond which no contribution shall be received from the Sustentation Fund. In the Free Church that maximum is £150. If ^500 be assumed as the limit here, then it may be determined that no pastor who receives ^500 or more from his congregation, shall receive anything from the Sustentation Fund. li INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. He and his people would then belong to the aid-giving and not to the aid-receiving class of churches. 4. All money raised within the churches, connected with the fund for the support of the ministry, should be remitted to the Sustenta- iion Committee or carried to its credit. If this plan were adopted the pastors could more freely urge their people to give, than when pleading for themselves. 5. Let a minimum be fixed to entitle any congregation to be taken into connexion with the fund. The salary then paid to the pastor may be determined, according to some regular scale, in proportion to the amount received from his congregation. For example, if a con- gregation contribute SlOO, the pastor's .salary may be fixed at {5400; if the congregation contribute ^200, the pastor may receive $500. Or it may be found best to adopt the plan of fixing the pastor's salary at one and a half the sum, or at double the sum, received from his congregation. 6. Those places whence nothing is received for the general fund, or an amount less than the sum determined as the minimum, must be considered as missionary stations to be supplied by young unmarried men, until they are able to contribute the amount necessary to enti- tle them to be received on the Sustentation Fund. Instead of appointing a " Sustentation Committee," it may be deemed expedient to commit this whole subject to the Board of Mis- sions, and to modify the plan of that Board in such a manner as to accomplish the end contemplated. It may be said that any such scheme as that above referred to, would be liable to great abuse. Men might be received on the fund, who were still engaged in secular pursuits, or were indolent, or inef- ficient, or unacceptable. This is undoubtedly true. But it is true of any conceivable plan of doing good, that it is liable to be abused. In carrying out such a plan, our reliance, under God, must be on the piety of the men introduced into the ministry, the supervision of the Presbyteries, and on the regular reports of the incumbents on the fund, as to the amount and results of their labours. If it be asked, where the money is to come from to carry out such a plan, it may be asked in reply, Where does it come from in Scotland? The Free Church raises annually about S350,000 for its sustentation fund. We are far more numerous, and have far more wealth than they. Our people are as liberal, piety is the same thing here, that it is there, we have as great a work to do, and as strong motives for doing it well. The great difterence lies in the difference of our plans, and consequently in the objects which we present to the people. If you propose to any congregation the support of their own pastor, or to send a number of missionaries to the west, with a hundred dollars each, they will give accordingly. But if you pro- pose to them the larger object of providing for the adequate support of every faithful minister in our Church, they will awake to new views, and to larger conceptions of their duty and privileges. It is not expected that these suggestions will meet with general or immediate acceptance. They are to be regarded as mere hints, to INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. 18 be modified indefinitelv, as the wisdom or experience of the Church may determine. The following remarks, however, seem to deserve consideration, in favour of some such plan. 1. It will be a compliance, on the part of our Church, with the law of Christ, tliat they who preach the gospel, shall live by the gospel. 2. It will enable our pastors to devote themselves to their minis- terial work, instead of giving, as in a multitude of cases is now una- voidable, a large portion of their time to some secular employment, for the support of their families. 3. It will in a measure do away with the undue and unjust dispa- rity in the salaries of our ministers. It has ever been justly considered a great reproach on the Church of England, that while one portion of her clergy have the income of princes, so large a part of her labori- ous ministers have from £30 to £50 a year. 4. As such a plan presupposes the unity of the Church, and can be successfully prosecuted only under the influence of a recognition of that unity, its adoption and successful prosecution must promote brotherly love. And if it have that effect, the blessing of God \vi\[ descend upon us as the dew on Hermon. 5. The plan is essentially, (to borrow the language of Dr. Chal- mers,) aggressive. It presses the Church continually forward, sus- taining the gospel in places, where from the fewness, the indifference, or poverty of the people it could not otherwise be supported. 6. It leaves untouched the intimate relation between the pastor and the people, and the reciprocation of benefits between them, while the minister is not made entirely dependent on his own imme- diate congregation for his support. A large portion of his salary however must ever come from them, and on their confidence and. kindness he must ever be dependent for many of his comforts. There are many other lessons besides those above indicated to be derived from this pamphlet. But enough has probably been said to explain the reason of its republication in this country. It cannot be denied that we fall short of the example set us by the Free Church of Scotland. The principles on which they act are those on which we must act if we would be equally useful as a church. We must feel that we are one body; that the weakest and the strongest are equally bound to do what they can for the common cause. We must become more systematic in our operations, and devise some plan by which personal application shall be made to all our members for their contributions. Ministers must feel that the chief responsi- bility in every good work devolves on them. They are the leaders of the flock; if they go forward the people will follow. While we thus strive to awaken a livelier sense of brotherhood in the Church, and to bring about a more equal distribution of its re- sources, we must allow the several parts to act freely in their respec- tive spheres. The foot must not say, because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; neither must the eye say to the hand, I have no need of you. There is no schism in the natural body ; neither is there 14 INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. any alienation of feeling in the Church, so far as the Holy Ghost dwells in it. Indiiference, therefore, on the part of the strong, or envy on the part of the weak, is an evidence of the absence of the Spirit, and cause for alarm and humiliation to all conscious of such infirmities. We need, therefore, above all things, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, to give us wisdom to know how to act, and to dis- pose and enable us to act right. PEEEACE. The body of this little work was printed, but can scarcely be said to have been published, last year. As it contains the most matured views of its author, the fruit of much thought and of some expe- rience, he is unwilling that it should be altogether lost. He there- fore presents it anew to the Church, in a form which leaves the main pamphlet untouched, but with this peculiarity in its structure, that each topic which required any further enlargement, or to be repre- sented over again with still greater earnestness and urgency than before, has a distinct place assigned for it in a little section with its own distinct title, which sections are made to compose an Appendix to the work. It is to this Appendix that I would invite the special attention of the reader, as containing a series of final deliverances on the matters which are there successively taken up. I have, at the same time, to apologize for the somewhat absolute and aphoristical style in which they are given forth, as being more like the sentences of a judge who has already got a verdict to found upon, than the pleadings of an advocate who has yet a verdict to obtain. The only explanation which I can give of this peculiarity is, that I have already pleaded long enough, which the reader will find to his cost, were he to reperuse the various reports and other documents which from time to time 1 have been called upon to prepare on the financial affairs of the Free Church. This is the last representation which I mean to offer upon the sub- ject; and, such being the case, it is most natural that I should feel the importance, nay, the paramount duty, of stating not only the truth, but the whole truth, however unpalatable, if but salutary, or needful and desirable to be made known. There is a sensitive dread among several of our friends of any thing like the appearance of dissatisfaction or differences amongst ourselves, which really it is high time that we should now get the better of. The Free Church of Scotland is far too strong, too deeply rooted in the affections and confidence of the people, to be easily shaken, at least in any of her essential supports, by those misunderstandings and altercations of sentiment which are unavoidable in so large a body. She is now strong enough to stand the blasts of controversy, and can afford to be told, even publicly and by proclamation from the house-tops, of her faults and her errors. There ought to be no hushing up. The Free Church public of Scotland is far too large to have the benefits and the wholesome influences of frank and open and fearless dis- cussion withheld from it, lest another Scottish public, exterior to ours and apart from ours, should lift up their shout of exultation and 16 PREFACE. augur our speedy downfall, when they observe that questions are getting up amongst us, or think we are far from being perfectly at one. It will turn out, I trust, that the fears of our friends, and the triumph or liopeful anticipations of our enemies, are alike groundless. It is an old phenomenon, and one which the observation of forty years has now made perfectly familiar to us, that the country breth- ren should look with a vigilance bordering somewhat upon jealousy to our more conspicuous ecclesiastics in the larger towns; and, in so far as they are actuated by feelings of dislike for aught like the regi- men of a metropolitan cliqueship,do we most thoroughly sympathize with them.* But, on the other hand, they too should bear to be told of their short-comings, else I can look for little toleration or compla- cency at their hands — purposing as I do, in the following pages, to tell with all sincerity, though at the same time with the utmost affec- tion and good-will, wherein it is that I think many of them are defi- cient, and some of them, I fear, most grievously in the wrong. I hope to be forgiven for the plain speaking which occurs in some of the following passages, as, next to my regard for the moral and Christian good of the people of Scotland, is the personal liking I have for their ministers. But open rebuke is better than secret or silent love. * A thing-, however, may be very hateful, while it remains a question in how far the thing is realized. The jealousy here spoken of may often be as groundless as it is some- times low-minded. The talent for public business, and more esjwcially for the guidance of so large a corporation as a parliament or an ecclesiastical assembly — itself an eccle- siastical parliament — this talent, we say, may in itself constitute an obligatory call on those who are possessed of it, so as to make it their justifiable, nay, their incumbent vocation, to take the influential and ostensible part which they do in the management of our affairs. If the Church but knew the fatigue and the sacrifices of ease and domes- tic enjoyment which are endured by those men, and the weight of care which lies upon their spirits, it would view them as the proper objects of gratitude, nay, even of pity, at the very time, perhaps, when they are assailed by clamours, and loaded till they are like to break down with unreasonable, and, it may be, with envious complaints. OEIGINAL PEEFACE. In* announcing my determination now to retire from the public busi- ness of the Free Church, I feel confident that it will not be ascribed to any decay of affection for its cause. It is not a matter of choice, but of physical necessity. I have neither the vigour nor alertness of former days; and the strength no longer remains with me, either for the debates of the Assembly, or for the details of committees and their correspondence. At the last Assembly but one, during the first days of which I en- joyed a health I never expect to regain, I did a very rash thing. I moved the appointment of an extension committee, and accepted of its convenership. I fondly imagined the possibility of weathering one twelvemonth more of such active service as had long been familiar to me; and deemed the object I had in view of such special importance, as to justify the attempt. A few weeks convinced me of my error; and, since the month of August in 1844, my connection with our financial affairs has been little better than nominal. I can still describe, however, what I cannot execute; and the process which I hoped to set agoing will be laid before the reader in the following pages. Its accomplishment by me is now wholly out of the ques- tion; and, if judged worthy by the Church of being carried into effect, should be devolved on younger and abler men. I shall be at all times ready to offer my opinion, and to state the results of my former experience, whenever it shall be required of me. Egotism is painful, and more especially when it relates to one's constitutional peculiarities. Yet we are not sure if it can be deemed a peculiarity, that one should feel it greatly more fatiguing execu- tively to carry his object over the adverse views and conceptions of other men, than arguraentatively, and by following out his own unin- terrupted processes of thought, to set it forth in a way that might best recommend it to those of kindred understanding with himself. It surely requires a far more strenuous effort to succeed in the estab- lishment of a measure, than merely to advocate an opinion, even though so advocated as to succeed in the establishment of a principle. The one achievement is a triumph often effected by a leader in the hall of deliberation or debate; — the other is an achievement that might often be effected by a professor in his class-room. My prefer- ence all along has been for the latter over the former employment — to operate on the ductile minds of the young, rather than engage in arduous conflict with my fellows on questions of ecclesiastical right or polity. Circumstances have engaged me in the more uncongenial work; and for twelve years the duties of the chair have been sadly encroached upon, throughout no less than three successive warfares — those of Church Establishments, and Church Extension, and, lastly. 18 ORIGINAL PREFACE. Church Independence. I do hope that it will neither surprise nor offend my brethren of the Free Church, that I now resign a general care of the churches, for a more special and intense care of those stu- dents who are to be the Church's future guides and guardians. The matters which I am henceforth to give up have now proceeded so far, that, without derangement or inconvenience, they may be left to pass from one hand and one management to another. And, in these circum- stances, for me to persevere any longer in the work of a committee, at the expense and to the injury of the far higher work of a class, were something like the monstrous inversion of starving the heart in order to feed the extremities. Yet I should have been unwilling to relinquish the "outward business of the house of God," without the closing effort which I now make for the exposition and enforcement of my views ; both on those matters which I deem to be of most urgent importance, and on those, let me be permitted to say, in which I fear that the Church is most likely to go astray. It is very possible that some of my views will not be found to quadrate with those of men possessing great weight and consideration in our Church. This will not prevent me from stating them, though I am no longer able to contend for them. I have not forgotten the all but universal incredulity wherewith the proposal for Associations was received; and can now ask, in what state of external support would our Church have at this moment been, but for these Associations? The experiment has now ripened into experience; and, with God's blessing, I have the utmost confidence that, on the strength of a few plain and obvious principles, not only might the support of the Free Church be secured, but its extension be indefinitely carried forward. There is enough of evidence, how- ever, even in the brief history of our Free Church, to justify the apprehension that these principles may be forgotten and disregarded. There is a leaven of selfishness, which, if not purged out, might leaven the whole lump; and, should it come to this, we can look neither for stability nor enlargement — when all men mind their own things, and not the things of the Lord Jesus. M ECONOMICS FREE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND, Our observations on the Financial System of the Free Church had better be arranged into different sections, with titles expressive each of a separate yet integral department of the whole subject. In our first section we shall treat of the Contributions made or making in all parts of the country for the support of the Free Church. In the second, of the business devolved upon the Board of Correspondence and Management in Edinburgh, or, in other words, on the Financial Committee. In the third, on the principles by which the distribu- tion of the Central Fund, formed chiefly by remittances from the Associations of the Free Church, ought to be regulated. In the fourth, on the distinction, if any, which should be made between those ministers of the Free Church who left the Establishment at the Disruption, and those who have become ministers in it since. In the fifth, we propose to treat of Church Extension. In the sixth, to present a general view of the Schemes and Objects of the Church, so as that its members and friends might be made distinctly aware what the regular calls are upon their liberality, and what the peri- odical collections which they might lay their account with, and which ought not to be multiplied interminably or at random. We shall then, in a seventh section, conclude with the application of our prin- ideration whatever fioui doing their uttermost for the proraotioa of a cause so obviously 50 APPENDIX. patriotic and Christian. We do not ask them to solicit contributions in their own person ; but we ask them to put Ibrth their legitimate influence on the deacons and collectors. It were surely no great sacrifice to hold a monthly meeting with these, to be present at their reports ol' progress, to urge upon them tiie mighty importance of llieir office, to suggest such directions and details as might aid them in the dis- charge of its duties, to spirit them on by the example of ot.ier places, to state the positive religious obligation which lies upon them of being as little burdensome as possible, to represent the' superior blessedness of being givers rather than receivers; and, if plain language be necessary, to tell how odious, how disgustingly odious, for tliem to be an incubus on the Church, at the expense of other congre- gations more generous than they, and so as to lay an arrest upon its extension, and keep out the light of the gospel from localities far more destitute than their own. On tills subject see a very admirable address to the Presbytery of Linlithgow by James M. Hog, Esq. of Newliston. If such remonstrances as his do not tell in arousing our Free Church ministers to a sense of their responsibilities and duties, I give up in despair what, would they but co-operate as they ought, might be a most easy and practicable attainment, such an augmentation of our means as would enable us to meet both the ecclesiastical and educational wants of all our people. Whenever the minister is in good earnest, and gives himself zealously and heartily to the object, there never fails to be a prosperous association. In other words, should the Free Church fall short of this lofty aim, the failure will lie at the door of her own clergymen. No. II. On the Possibility of Supporting a Chvrch, even of National Magniiude and Extent^ by the Contributions of the Middle and Lower Classes. Sec. I. § 5. To demonstrate this possibility, or rather to turn this possible into actual, it is not necessary that each locality should do all for itself; but we utterly despair of a universal result, if each locality, even the poorest, is not made to do something; after which a something more might be done for it, proportional to what it has done for itself. We need never calculate on the endurance of a congregation that looks for all its supplies from without; and unless there be a fountain of more or less yield from within, it will either be stifled in embryo, or infallibly go down in a single generation. It is a sustained eflbrt by the people themselves, first to set up an Association, and then to keep it going, which forms our best guaranty for what may well be called fixity of tenure, whether to the mission or the ministry that has been planted in the midst of them. And here I cannot but record the unmixed complacency and satisfaction I have felt in all my correspondence with the good people of Ellsrighill — an upland, yet pleasing and picturesque hamlet in the neighbourhood of Biggar— where there is a devoted body of adherents, with at most'two or three husbandmen, but made up chiefly of labourers and the ser- vants of husbandmen. Their usual Sabbath attendance is ItiO; and the number of their home communicants at a late sacrament, exclusive of those from a dis- tance, was 85. Their annual contribution to our Central Fund is ^^41; and by which, in a humble way, they managed to support the catechisl who laboured amongst them. On being apprized by us that if, by a slight effort, they could raise about £20 more, by the operation of our rule, they would secure £11)0 a-year for their future minister— the last and truly most gratifying communication which I received from them was an expression of their entire satisfaction with this arrange- ment. O, for but two or three pious and intelligent travellers in our employ, under whose influence and care not one of our infant assemblages need be suflered to go down; who, instead of this, could foster hundreds more of them into being and stability, and so multiply these beauteous spectacles of piety and Christian worth all over the land ! Never was a church in a better or likelier position for filling up all the waste and vacant places in our land, than is at this moment the Free Church of Scotland. In the first place, it could make sure of a little nucleus of adherents every where. In the second place, it might form them into an embryo congregnlion; which, could it only manage to keep up through the succebsive stages of Us advancement, might APPENDIX. 51 in so many months, or say in two or three years, be in a fit state for the services of a full and regular ministry. In the originating:, as well as ihe conducting of i-uch a process, the utmost encouragement should be given to the efforts of lay piety. Without a co-operation Imm this quarter, we cannot possibly, in the pre- sent defect of our ecclesiastical labourers, meet the demands for help which come in upon us from all parts of the country. Anterior, therefore, to the services of a probationer, or even of a paid catechist, the Sabbath exercises might, in many in- stances, require to be shared as in our ordinary fellowship meetings, by the pious and the good among themselves. Who knows but that in the course of these earlier operations, an able and approved catpchist may at length spring up among them, and so raise them to a higher platform in the rank of their now progressive congregations'! We know of one such, now large and flourishing, with its hand- some church, and highly acceptable minister, which began not three years ago with but four or six individuals. But we have to speak not only of the demands from the country for help in men, but of their demands for help in money. It cannot be too earnestly insisted on, that nothing eff-'Ctual and permanent should be looked for in this way, if they will do little or nothing to help themselves. And, therefore, one of the earliest steps in devising for the continuance and growth of a new congregation, still in the smallness and feebleness of its infancy, is to form an Association out of its mem- bers, and give them well to understand, that, instead of counting on peculiar sup- plies from abroad, they should feel their main dependence to be on their own efforts and their own sacrifices. How these should be stimulated and carried onward, till, chiefly by dint of their own liberalities and exertions, their ecclesiastical economy was completed, will be detailed in a subsequent Note. See No. 8. The truth is, that analogous specimens to that of Ellsrighill might be reared every where. And this perhaps is the place for inserting Mr. Thompson's schedule, as a most effective instrument, either for raising new Associations, or for resusci- tating such as are extinct, or finally, for reinvigorating old ones. RATES OF CONTRIECTIONS TO THE SUSTENTATION FUND. SCALE. PER WEEK. PER MONTH. PER QUARTER. S. d. £ s. d. £ s. d. Rate, No. 1 * Rate, No. 2 . . . 1 4 1 Rate, No. 3 n 6 1 6 Rate, No. 4 ... 2 8 2 Rate, No. 5 3 1 3 Rate, No. 6 . . . . 6 2 6 Rate, No. 7 1 4 12 Rate, No. 8 2 8 1 4 Rate, No. 9 2 6 10 1 10 Rate, No. 10.... 3 6 14 2 2 Rate, No. 11 5 1 3 Rate, No. 12 * On considering the above rates, I agree to give to the General Sustentation Fund the sum specified in Rate No. — , for the year commencing at Martinmas, 1844, and request the Deacon or Collector to call for it each (Signature) * Rate No. 1 is left blank, to suit parties who may find tliat even the Rate, in No. 2 is beyond their ability; and Rate No. 12 is also left blank, to suit parties whose circum- stances may enable them to give a higher Rate than any put down in the scale. Some members of the Free Church give ±'1 a week, some X2, some £i a-week, and a few even more, to tlie Sustentation Fund. On the other hand, how grievous, how discouraging, to be told, that a process so hopeful, and which might be carried into effect any where, is utterly impracti- cable in this one, and that other, part of the country, from the extreme and uni- versal poverty which abounds in it. The thing is experimentally untrue. And BO contident am I of this, that 1 will not let go my expectation of a tenfold greater 52 APPENDIX. produce from the Highlands of Scotland, than we have ever yet received from them, a confidence fully warranted by the following- encouraging examples of what has been done, and is doing, in various localities ot that region: Abie of Amount of Contributions to the Sustentation Fund from the following Highland Furishes,from ist April 18'15, to 26lh March 1846, (nearly a year.) Kingussie, Presbytery of Abernethy, X9 1 1 Glenurquliart. „ Abertarff, 110 9 3 Knockbain, „ Chanonry, 102 3 7 Kedcaslle, „ „ 84 9 3 Kiiniorack, „ Dingwall, £116 5 9 Fcrinlosh, „ „ 107 6 Urray „ „ 102 3 6 Callander, „ Dunblane 127 Loeligilphead, „ Dunoon and Inverary, ... . 116161 Kirkhill, „ Inverness, 152 19 Kiltarlity, , 96 12 Snizort, „ Skye, 75 16 3 Rosskeen, „ Tain, 95 8 1 Loclibroom, „ Lochcarron, 90 I doubt not that others, if I knew their neighbourhoods as well, would call forth the same expressions of my admiration and gratitude. I feel confident thai if Mr. Macrae of Knockbain, would go forth on a mission through the Associ'itions of the north, he would awaken a noble spirit of Christian emulation and liberality over the Highlands of Scotland. " Let us provoke each other to love and to good works." Truly the Free Church has had sore difficulties to contend against, both right and left. On the one hand, it is cut altogether off from the liberalities of the great bulk and body of the upper classes; and, on the other hand, as if to com- plete our hciplessne??, and make sure our speedy and entire overthrow, are there many injudicious sentimentalists among our friends, who would lay their interdict on every attempt to obtain a revenue from the offerings of the great bulk and body of the common people. And yet they will look for dividends all the while. Verily to be placed under such taskmasters is worse than an Egyptian bondage. To make dividends without contributions, I should hold to be a work of greater diffi- culty than to make bricks without straw. On the subject of a perpetuity for our system, I have omitted what I hold to be a useful hint tor making sure of it. There is a labourer in my own Association who gives 3d. a-week; but, with great judgment and good feeling, he gives it in three names, his own, and those of two of his children. By thus dividing the family contribution, even thouirh to include all the children, you behoved to associate with each of^ their names a half-penny a week, or say a penny, nay, even a half- penny a month, the good habit, along with its wholesome principle, might be made to descend from generation to generation. No. III. On the Offerings of the Common People. Sec. I. § 6. For my views upon this subject I would refer to a tract published by me more than thirty years ago, in order to repel the objection, thai by taking contributions for a religious object from people in humblf lite, we hastened their de.scent to a etaie of pauperism. The tollowing extract forms one part of my reply to the adversaries of all such institutions: "The single circumstance of its being a voluntary act, forms the defence and the answer lo all the clamours of an atlected sympathy. You tiike from the poor! No! thev give. You luitilies. The law of getting as they give supplies the very stimulus that is oLviously awanling; and which, if not supplied, will perpetuate such a drag upon the Church as shall both restrain, or rather wholly arrest its progress, and keep down the general circumstances of the whole body. We would not have dwelt so long on the subject of this note, hut for our appre- hension of its being the very subject on which the Free Church is likeliest to go wrong. And should the apprehension be verified, then must we abandon our loudly cherished hope of its ever attaining to the magnitude of a national insti- tute, or of its ever reaching farther than by a very little way among our yet unpro- vided families. The loss of importance to it is comparatively a bagatelle; but it is APPENDIX. 59 no basratelle that we should adopt a system which limits and disables us as a Home Mission, and so confines that gospel within a narrower territory, the blessed calls and overtures of which might, under another economy, be brought to every poor man's hovel, to every cottage door. No. VIIL Fear lest the work of Church Extension should he mismanaged or neglected. We confess that our fears lest any suggestions which might be offered shaU not be attended to, but be overlooked in the headlong and hurried style of Assem- bly business, by which matters are huddled through, of whatever importance ; and however essential, that they should have been well weighed and undergone a thorough elaboration in the silent chambers of thought, or amid the leisurely deliberations of a small and select committee, the members of which were not overborne by the multitude of their tasks, we confess that our fears lest such mat- ters should proceed in their wonted hap-hazard way, have been greatly confirmed and aggravated by a very glaring inslnnce of it that occurred since tlie first im- pression of this pamphlet was thrown off", and copies of it put into the hands of the most prominent and public men in Edinburgh, and who have to do in the man- agement of the affairs of the Free Church. The very essence of our proposed training method for the non-ministerial Associations, lies in the separate corres- pondence that we hold, and the separate accounts that we keep with each of these. But so little was this adverted to, even after the method had been proceeded in for nearly a whole twelvemonth, that two or more Committees which stood related to these Associations were on the eve of a joint resolution that all their contributions should be merged is^to one, and disposed of for the general behoof. This measure was fortunately averted by the production of the original circulars which had been sent forth at the outset of this peculiar arrangement, when it was discovered that the produce of such Associations could not be alienated from the special to the gen- eral application, without the violation of a distinct understanding with each and with all of them. Jt was well that a very grievous blunder was thus prevented ; but, on the other hand very mortifying to find that the charm and efficacy of thia separate mode of treatment were still so little acknowledged and so little under- stood. It is, however, all the more gratifying now, that there is a likelihood of these nursery operations being better attended to. My able and intelligent friend Mr. Handyside, is all alive to the importance of them. The beauty and the efficacy of such a process as that exemplified at Eljsrighill could not fail indeed to arrest and convince all who have had the opportunity of closely observing them. And it is a very great satisfaction that the correspondence with these nursling or embryo congregations should have fallen into the hands and been placed under the direc- tion of Mr. Tweedie. I do hope tiiat he will be left to prosecute this very high and most prolific walk of usefulness without disturbance or embarrassment of any sort. And here, let me be sufl>^red to make frank and honest utterance of the mischief and mismanagement which I conceive to be attendant on the interference of Committees with each other. Each should have its own well defined task and territory, and each should be left to the separate and uncontrolled manag(^ent of its own affairs — subject of course, and responsible at all times to the Assembly, to whom it briniTs the annual report of its proceedings; but free from all jurisdic- tion on the part of other Comrnitlees — between which there should be the utmost readiness to confer, for the sake of mutual information and advice, but with no power either to overrule one another's decisions or to intromit with one another's fut;d!5. Nothing could exceed the regularity and right working of this mechanism in the old Assembly; whereas the system of dovetailing and complicating the committees with each other, has not only the immediate effect of confusing; every thing; hut in its tendencies and final outgoings would place the whole business of the Church in the hands of a small ecclesiastical oligarchy. J exceedmgly grieve to find that many are yet so insensible to practical evils which even in our brief course have been so often experienced from this cause, and ought to be vigorously and instantly redressed. Before quilting the subject of this article, let me state as minutely as I can the W» APPENDIX. respective influences for good, and for evil; first, of the system under whifli each locality receives as it gives; and secondly, of the system under which there is placed full before the view of each locality from the outset, the share that will fail to it, when once admitted among the ordained charges, of a prospective uni- versal equal dividend. 1. Let the locality in question be some plebeian district of a lar^e town, or some recent manufacturing village, chiefly made up of utter aliens from the gospel ; there, with the exception of school fees, little or nothing can be expected, at the outset, from the co-operation of their own payments. The necessary advances will have to be made in the first instance by a voluntaryism ab extra, though it need not to be long ere that the voluntaryism ah intra is brought into action. This, indeed may begin so soon as a Sabbath service is instituted, with the customary oflTerings at the door; but the great and decisive epoch of its operations is when, after a sufficient nucleus has been obtained for the future regular congregation, a District Association is set up for weekly contributions, and these placed in the custody and for the purposes specified in the body of our pamphlet. The Associa- tion has only to be well worked, and it will do wonders. The wholesome habit of lending a helping hand themselves to the good work will take root amone the families. Themselves will be astonished to find how much they can do for the payment first, it may be, of their own catechist, then of their own probationer, nay, towards the erection of their own church; last of all, for the support of their own minister; and they ought to be provided with one so soon as they can raise two- thirds of i^lOO a-year. But they need not stop there. So great is our faith in the capabilities and willingness of our people under such a process as we are now describing, that it were no marvel to us though they should raise the whole jCIOO themselves, so as to obtain for their minister, at our present rate of one and a-half more, £1.50 a-year, and yield him a good supplement to the btrgain. With what delight would our aid-giving Associations push forward their liberalities, if sure that for every £.50 additional to their present annual contribution, they gained a distinct parochial economy amon? our former out-field population. Church exten- sion would proceed, with rapid strides, from one territory to another, under such a procedure as this, till all the spiritual destitution of our land were at length over- taken. 2. But try the other way of it, and as yet we have been doing little better with our out-field operations. Let the people among whom we work be confirmed in their sordidness and lethargy by the imagination that all is to be done for them, and that little or nothing is expected from themselves. Let the rudimental education, under which they are made to pass, be one of selfishness, instead of considerate regard fijr the necessities of a Church that has to provide for other places and other people beside their own. Above all, let the prospect of an equal dividend he held out to vitiate both the parties concerned; lulling the people into apathy, and, perhaps, tainting, by a most unworthy motive, the he'art of him whose predotuinant impulse to his work, as an ecclesiastical labourer, should be an affec- tion for human souls. Last of all, let it be found, when the measure of its full ad- mission as a regular charge comes to be agitated, that it cannot be done but at the expense of nearly its wliole up-keeping to the General Fund of the Church ; and then we may well imaginp, with the indisposition of aid-givers to do all if aid- receivers are to do nothing, with what slowness Church-extension will proceed, or rather, with what certainty it will soon be brought to a dead stand. A process so impure in its earlier stage, and landing in such a burdensome result, neither will nor should go prosperously forward. And yet, such is the mistiness and confusion of ideas upon this subject, that people will ask. How can extension go on without the encouragement of an equal dividend? With the encouragement of the one and a-half more we can make way; but with the equal dividend we shall never make way, at least throughout the dense and, as yet, unexplored masses of our increas- ing towns and newly-sprung-up villages. A wedge is employed for penetration; but it makes all the difference in the world, thoiisjli not greater than the difl'er- ence between the two methods which we are now comparing, whether we shall present the fi'ne or the blunt edge of it. APPENDIX. Bt No. IX. On the Prospects of Voluntaryism. Sec. VII. § 2. I thoucrht it possible ihat among the other slight articles which compose this Appendix, and which I am forced to write calamo currente, I might have had some space for a few thoughts on the subject of the present one. I can afford to say no more than that my hopes of an extended Christianity from the efforts of Volun- taryism alone have not been brightened by my experience since the Disruption. This is no reason why we should seek an alliance with the State by a compromise of the Church's spiritual independence; and still less with a government, which on the question of endowments, disclaims all cognizance of the merits of that religion on which it confers support, and makes no distinction between the true and the false, between the scriptural and the unscriptural. Still, it may be a heavy misfortune, it may prove a great moral calamity, when a Government does lall into what, speaking in the terms of my own opinion, I hold to be the dereliction of a great and incumbent duty. And ere I am satisfied that Voluntaryism will repair the mischief, I must first see the evidences of its success in making head against the fearfully increased heathenism, and increasing still, that accumulates at so fast a rate throughout the great bulk and body of the common people. We had better not say too much on the pretensions or the powers of Voluntaryism, till we have made some progress in reclaiming the wastes of ignorance and irre- ligion and profligacy which so overspread our land ; or till we see whether the congregational selfishness which so predominates every where, can be prevailed on to make larger sacrifices for the Christian good of our general population. Should their degeneracy increase to the demolition, at length, of the present frame- work of society, and this in spite of all that the most zealous Voluntaryism can do to withstand it, it will form a most striking experimental demonstration of the vast importance of Christian Governments for the Christian good of the world. The lights of experience and prophecy will be found to harmonize, when, after what may be called the horrors of the middle passage, the desolating flood of anarchy and misrule that is coming upon the earth, the Millennium will at length emerge from it; but that, in conjunction therewith, the kingdoms of the world shall become the kingdoms of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; or, in other words, the Governments of the world shall all be Christianized. It seems very clear that internal Voluntaryism will not, of itself, do all, and, with all the vaunted prosperity of the Free Church, we do not find that external Voluntaryism will either make up the deficiencies of the former, or, still less, of itself, do all either. If the two can be made so to act and react as to stimulate, rather than check and discourage each other, a better result might be obtained than we yet have arrived at; and, for this purpose, it calls for the highest wis- dom of the Church to relate these two elements or agents aright to each other. It, I trust, is pretty obvious now that, under the system of an equal dividend, it is tiie imagined sufficiency of the external which keeps our internal Voluntaryism so miserably low in more than half our congregations; and, on the other hand, the provoking exhibition of so much apathy and selfishness must inevitably, sooner or later, cool and alienate our aid-giving congregations, till an arrest be laid on the further increase of external Voluntaryism. Under the system of getting as they give, the very reverse of this takes place. The internal puts forth its most strenu- ous efforts that it might share as largely as possible of the external; and, on the other hand, the external rejoices in fostering and calling out the internal to do its uttermost. Should both together, however, fall short, and there is too much reason to ap- prehend this, both from the selfishness and the short-sightedness which prevail amongst us, then must we lay our account with an untouched mass of heathenism, both in large towns and in many other places of the land. And so the argument for State endowments, if only given on a right principle, will stand thus: Are the thousands and the tens of thousands whom Voluntaryism, with all its efforts, and, we may well add, with all Us high-sounding pretensions, have failed to overtake, are they to be sacrificed to an impotent and most inoperative theory — a theory tried in all its forms, and most palpably found wanting'? 6 •9 APPENDIX. We rejoice, therefore, in the testimony of the Free Churcli fur the principle of a JValional Esiablishinenl, and most sincerely do we hope that she will never fall away from it. Little do those of her enemies, who, at the same time, are the friends of loyalty and order — (for, besides these, we can rank many of tiie turbu- lent and disaffected in society as among the deadliest of her enemies) — little do they know, that the Free Church is, at this moment, lifting a far more influential testimony on the side of ecclesiastical endowments, than can possibly be given in any other quarter of society. Hers is a wholly disinterested testimony in their tavuur, for she reaps no advantage from them; but, sorely aggrieved thi ugh she has been by our rulers, she will neither underrate the importance of their friend- ship, nor yet the solemn obligation whicii lies upon them to care for the religion of the people, and to provide within their sphere for this best and highest interest of the commonwealth. There is a saying of the King of Prussia quoted by my friend Dr. D'Aubigne, and strangely rejoiced in by our Continental Voluntaries in support of their sys- tem. The King puts the question. What were my duty to my mother if she were a slave? and his reply is — Emancipate her. Were it not his farther duty to sup- port her? or does he acquit himself of all he owes to her by simply giving her liberty, and then leaving her to starve"? Were it not wrong to withliold from her the requisite maintenance] Just as wrong as to give her the maintenance, and, as the price of it, take away from her the liberty. This last is the wrong that hag been done by the British Government to the Church of Scotland, to escape from which 470 of her ministers came out at the Disruption, though in so doing, they had to encounter and submit to another wrong, even the spoliation of what waa most rightfully and constitutionally theirs. No. X. Conclusion — The Avthor^s view of what should he the state of the Chtirch''s outward Business for the following twelvemonth. We have no wish for the instant adoption of any material change, saving for a more efficient agency, and more especially for paid visitors who might transact personally between the Edinburgh Committees, and all the places in Scotland where their services might be available for the good of the Free Church; which is no other than the best and highest good of all our families. VVilh this exception, we should be happy if things were allowed to remain as they are till the Assembly ot'1847; provided that the following suggestion wereacted on, a suggestion whicli I owe to a closely related friend of my own; and to whom I also stand indebted tor the first suggestion which led to the memorable Convocation of November, 1842. an event which both in itself and in its consequences is one of the greatest that ever took place in the ecclesiastical annals of Scotland. The suggestion is simply this: That the Assembly of 1S46 should appoint a committee, made up of real business men, with a very small proportion of eccle- siastics; and who, after a lengthened, and deliberate, and comprehensive survey of the whole matter, might rpport to us next year their well-inatured opinion, both as to the best way of raising the Church's funds, and as to the best and fittest method for the distribution of them. So large a pecuniary concern, approaching to nearly a hundred thousand pounds in the year, and implicated with an object so mighty as the moral and religious well-being of Scotland — we say, that an interest of such extent and magnitude as this, should not be left at the mercy of every random conception which might occur on a single and superficial glance to any hasty observer; but should be committed to the judgment and experience of men who are conversant in the affairs of life, and can look with a practised eye both to the connections and the consequences of any arrangeinent that might be proposed. Let us wait patiently for the well-weighed deliverance of such men as these; and, meanwhile, let all our Associations, placed under their surveillance, and vigilantly looked to in all their workings by able inspectors so well qualified to appreciate and distinguish between the com'mendably cfticient and the culpably remiss— let these Associations feel and act as il' put on their good behaviour; and then, with the blessing of God, wc predict, with all confidence, that by May, 1647, they will APPENDIX. 83 have made full proof of their sufficiency for suptainir.g and perpetuating- a machinery adequate to all the religious and all the ecclesiastical necessities of our people. I'he above paraoraphs were written last year, the change being only made now from the years 1845 and 1846 to 1646 and 1847. But the suggestion has been mis- understood, and so the matter was devolved on the J?ustentation Committee, where, I am told, it was agitated at a large general meeting, tiie worst kind of body, we do not say for finally deciding, but certainly for preparing a complex arithmetical scheme, made up of many details, and involving many and various considerations. It is only a small and very select committee which can rightly make their way to such a scheme. It should be then long and in many ways before the Free Church pub- lic, and subject to the amendments and modifications that might be proposed from all quarters, ere it shall be definitely adopted by the General Assembly. We can- not imagine a more admirable mechanism for a process like this, than that which is supplied by the Church courts of our Presbyterian constitution, when any meas- ure for permanent regulation is committed to the ordeal of the Barrier Act. We have no fear that once the manifold lights of free and full discussion have shone upon the question in all parts of the Church, the returns from Presbyteries will evince a very general and harmonious understanding of what is best. Though this proposed Committee should have its sittings in the Metropolis, It ought to have one or two members from other places, and more Especially from Glasgow, It is by no moans indispensable that they should be selected from the members of Assembly ; for did we confine ourselves to these, we should be cut off from the services of some of the wisest business heads and best business habits in all Scotland. My reason for suggesting even so much as one ecclesiastic is, that they may assign certain good general objects which might not so readily occur to men of another profession, though these be the fittest for devising the pecuniary means by which they might be provided for. Certain it is that none who stand publicly committed to any particular view should be allowed to have a share in them — however desirable it be that both they and all others should be encouraged to give their respective proposals or schemes for the consideration of such a Com- mittee as we have ventured to recommend. We cannot figure a more egregious absurdity than to speak of the Church being committed to any particular scheme, or to any part of one, as, for example, an equal dividend. She is not more pledged to give out an equal dividend to all ministers, than she is to take in no more than a penny a week from all contributors. When the system of our present Associations was first expounded, the demonstration of their power was grounded on the hypothesis of a penny a week, from each mem- ber, on which, as the base line of our calculation, we stated how much could thus be allowed to each minister. We can imagine nothing more ruinous than to ground upon this, not only a present but a prospective claim to an equal dividend in all time coming. And yet we hear as if an equal dividend were the radical principle of the scheme. The radical principle of our scheme is the power of littles; and it is to the practical disregard or reversal of this that all our difficul- ties are owing. It is because of the confidence which our aid-receiving Associa- tions have in great sums, and not in small sums; in the hundreds raised in Edin- burgh and Glasgow, instead of the pennies which ought to be raised not from wretched minorities, but from the great bulk and body of their own congregations, it is because of this that the Free Church moves at so slow a pace among the out- fields of our land. Would they but generalize their contributions till it became a universal habit that each should give something, it might enable us to progress at a greatly faster rate than we are doing. It is my confidence in the power of these Associations when well worked, which leads me to befriend the idea of admitting our Free Church teachers to a share in the Sustentation Fund, This is quite a topic for the deliberation of our proposed Committee, But, meanwhile, had our coming Assembly but the faith and cour- age to venture on an experimental year, it would mightily enlighten the question, and I fondly hope would supply a powerful impulse for the enlargement of our cause. For the idea of some such process as the following, I am indebted to a very able and energetic friend. Let the Sustentation Fund be kept entire for the ministers till their dividend reached £100 a-year, Aiterwards, let the increase upon this be alloted to the schoolmasters to the extent of £25 a year. Then what- ever ulterior increase might accrue, let it be shared in the proportion of four to 64 APPENDIX. one between the two parties. It were no surprise to me, however Utopian it might appear to others, ihat under the new influence which such a system would create and keep in action, there would speedily result a dividend of £200 for eacli minister, and j£50 for each schoolmaster throughout the vast majority of our church, while the inferior provisions made for those who are under the rule of getting as they give, would rapidly tend upwards to this maximum. We have no sympathy with those who think that we are aspiring at a maximum which is too large, feeling as we do that all public functionaries, and more especially the functionaries, of edu- cation, are greatly underpaid. Little are our aid-receiving Associations aware how much they stand in the way of high interests. O, that they had more of the spirit of the Apostle, who told the elders of Ephesus, that his own hands minis- tered to his own necessities; and adduced the precious saying of our Saviour, tha«t it was more blessed to give than to receive ! {< I ^ATE DlJf^ y^\.. ^.Vl.v- jrv^y w . '-mim .'^r?^:^>i