-^^^^i^^'^'i^^^ " ;OG!CALSeVi^ BX 9184 .AS W73 1832 Willison, John, 1680-1750 An example of plain catechising upon the AN EXAMPLE OF UPON THE ASSEMBIiY'S SHORTER CATECHISIW: HUMBLY OFFERED •As an help for instructing the Young and Ignorant in the knowl- edge of the Principles and Duties of the Christian Re- ligion, with the grounds thereof, and that in a very comprehensive manner. WITH ^ PREFJICE^ BRIEFLY DEMONSTRA.TIXG THE TRUTH OF THE CHRISTIAN RE- LIGION, AND THE UNREASONABLENESS OF INFIDELITY. / By the Rev. Mr. John TVillison, Minister of the Gospel in Dundee. Hold fast the form of sound words. — 2 Tim. i. 13. PITTSBURGH : PUBLISHED AND SOLD BY LUKE LOOMIS & Ca J. WILSON, PRINTER—STEUBENVILLE, OHIO. - THE PREFACE. In Scotland, the ministers are obliged by their church rules and constitutions, to be much employed in the work o^ Catechising; and the good fruits of it do appear; for there the people (compar- atively speaking) are generally knowing and orthodox: whereas, in those places where catechising is neglected, ignorance and error do wofuliy prevail. It is found by experience that there is more knowledge diffused among the ignorant and younger sort by one hour's catechising, than by many hours preaching: for, by the method of catechising, the attention is provoked, as well as the understanding instructed, and memory gratified; whilst many excellent sermons are lost through the non-atlention of the hearers, or the weakness of their memories. In the primitive church catecldsing w'as very much their work. They had many ministers set apart for it, called Catechists: and sundry of their most eminent lights were so called, for their ex- celling and diligence in this good work. Before persons were admitted to the full communion of the church, they were from time to time to be catechised, and kept under trial; and, till such time as they were judged fit to partake of the sacrament, they were called CatccJiumcni. Our Lord doth enjoin all his ministers to be careful to feed the lambs of his flock, as well as the older sheep, John xxi. 1 5. And accordingly we find his apostles took care to feed the babes with milk before they were able to receive stronger meat, 1 Cor. iii. 1, 2. Heb. v. 12. As we have our Catechisms, so they had Forms of instruction in which the young and weak were catechised yC?iX- led a Form of Knowledge, Rom. ii. 20. a Form of Doctrine, Rom. vi. 17. the Form of Sound JJ^ords, 2 Tim. i. 13. the fr&t Principles of the Oracles of God, Heb, v. 12, and the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ, Heb. vi. 1. In these were both Theo- philus and Apollus catechised, Luke i. 4. Acts xviii. 25. in bot{i of which texts, the word in the Greek is Catechised, which we have there rendered Instructed. The apostle Paul doth require the people of Galatia to give all encouragement and support lo those who labored in the work of catechising among them, Gal. vi. 6. Let him that is taught in the irord, communicate to him that teaoheth in all good things: In the original, it is. Let him that is catechised, communicate to him that caiechiseih. This office is not below the most learned divines, seeing Christ sets himself a pattern to us in it, by catechising his disciples, Matth. xvi. 15, 16. We in this national church, through the Lord's mercy, are pro- vided with excellent Catechisms, both Larger and Shorter, for iv PREFACE. our lielp in Catechising. And the Assembly's Shorter Catechism^ established in this church about ninety years ago, (which both we and the body of Protestant dissenters in our neighboring nations do receive and teach our children by) is judged the most excellent summary we ever had, in so small a compass, of the great princi- ples of the Christian religion, extracted from the word of God. — It hath been greatly esteemed in foreign parts also, and upon that account hath been translated into both Latin and Greek. In the Ijand of divine Providence, it proves a noble fence against error, wherever it is received; and therefore the adversaries of truth are not a little displeased with it. There was a very wild attempt lately made by an anonymous author to alter our Shorter Cafechiwi,w\vchwiis printed at Lon- don in the year 173 5, under ihe title of The Assc?nbly''s Shorter Catcchum Revised. But the alterations therein made, being visibly designed to favor various errors now spread among us, fceverals of the Judicatories of this church judged themselves bound to give warning against tlie poison of it. Besides, there were RcmcwnS made upon it by a very judicious autlior at London, (to whom we stand much obliged) which have been dispersed both there and here as an antidote against it. By the foresaid attempt I have been excited to consider our Shorter Catechism more closely than before, and must now own, the more I view it, 1 am the better pleased with it, and desire to bless God for raising up such noble instruments in the last age to frame it for us: and do reckon it a great mercy, that we have not a catechism of this kind to frame and settle among us in this de- generate and licentious age. The Shorter Catechism being evidently founded upon the word of God, and a part of our standa'rds to which we stand solemnly ennjaged ; it becomes the lovers of truth to adhere firmly to it, and contend for it, as a most valuable attainment in our reformation, and always to wish and pray that it may be preserved entire to us and our posterity, and that generations to come may be trained up in the use of it to the latest ages. We have had many Explanatory Catechisjns upon it published, which have been most useful for increasing knowledge among us: but having observed in these which I have seen, that either the answers are too prolix for the memories of learners, or else too short to explain tlie nature and reason of tilings, I jiave humbly made essay, in the following Catechism, to observe a medium be- tween the foresaid extremes, and likewise to take in many things omitted by otiiers. It is highly tlie concern of us all to be well seen in the knowl- edge, and fixed in the belief, of the great truths of our holy reli- gion, summed up in the Shorter Catechism; especially in this PREFACE. V mi&lving tinre, when the winds of error are blowing, and the most sacred fundamental truths are openly attacked by Deists, Socini- ans, Arians, and others. As it is surprising to observe how fast erroneous books are spread and bought up at this day, so it is as- tonishing to behold to what height infidelity and damnable here- sies are arrived in -our age: while we who profess Christianity do wrangle with one another, alas, Injidelity doth prevail against us all! And it may cause us to tremble, to think what shall be the issue, if the God of truth do not in mercy arise and stop its career. Whence is it thai hifid'elity abounds, and the Christian revela- tion hath so many enemies? Alas! many are so bent to indulge themselves in vicious practices, that they can't endure Christ's holy laws which check them therein, and therefore study by all means to darken these truths and facts upon which these laws are founded, that they may render revelation doubtful and uncertain; and further, that they may make it quite needless, they labour, to advance Reason as a sufficient guide in matters of religion, and as that which may conduct us in the way to happiness. But if the bias of such persons to sensual lusts and pleasures vv®uld allow them fteeiy to think upon this subject, and impar- tially to view the noble design and convincing proofs of Christian- ity, the more fully would they be satisfied of the necessity and excellency, as well as of the truth and certainty of the Gospel rev-elation, and of its divine original. And, if my testimony there- unto could have any weight, I can say, after the most serious inquiry, I have full freedom to give it, and which 1 here offer with all humility upon the following grounds: Although my natural light or reason be sadly corrupted, yet the remains of it tell me there is a God, and that he ought to be believ- ed in what he sailh, and obeyed in what he commands. And by the clearest evidences I am assured, that the mind of God, with respect to ray salvation, is only now discovered to me in the Christian revelation, which I see is the completion of the Jewish institution. And this revelation, 1 find, doth confirm and perfect the religion of nature, seeing it corresponds with the dictates of natural reason and religion, and comes seasonably unto me to supply the great defects thereof. Though the light of nature intimates to me, that my life should be just and virtuous, and that I should shun what is offensive to God, and that he ought to be worshipped and glorified by me his creature, yet it leaves me igriorant of the right way and manner of (^oing it: but the Christian revelation doth both inform me how God is to be worshipped and served, and also with the strongest arguments enforces that which is the design of natural religion, namely^ the abandoning of sin and vice, and the practice of vir- A2 VI PREFACE. tue and piety. This is the scope and aim of all its mysteries, precepts, promises, threatenings, examples, miracles, &ic. I find those who have had no more ti^an Reason to guide them, had but faint discoveries of divine things, and these notices had but small influence on their minds and practices; hence they gen- erally entertained unworthy notions of God, and run into gross idolatry, and the practice of the greatest abominations: but the Christian revelation gives us a noble description of the perfections of God, and of the worship and duties he requires as suitable thereunto; and withal, offers us grace to conform our souls unto them. Natural Reason can give no satisfying account of the creation of the world, the ori^nal of mankind, nor in what state our first parents came out of their Maker's handsj nor can it tell us how human nature fell from its original rectitude into its present state of guilt and impurity, nor how it can be recovered from itj nor. can it account for the conduct of divine Providence in the government of the world : But in the Christian revelation we find all these duly accounted for. Natural Religion, which is altogether founded upon Reason or the light of nature, canH find out a way to ease the conscience of a convinced sinner, nor can it assure us that there is Forgive- ncss with God for criminal creatures: it cannot shew us how God may exercise Jfcrc?/ to them without the violation of his Jw^^ice; nor point out any thing that can be a proper propitiation to God's justice when injured and provoked by men; nature's light cannot tell how to make the pardon of sin consist with the wisdom of his government, the honor of his laws, and his hatred of sin. But we see how all this can be done, by;he Christian institution. Acrain, it is but dark and uncertain views which Natural Reli- gion gives us of the immortality of the soul, and of a future life. Sense and reason bring us to the grave, but cannot penetrate into the regions beyond it. But the Gospel revelation discovers to us the eternal mansions prepared in the heavens for the spirits of just men made perfect, and also the way leading to them. In the Bible, which contains thi^ revelation, we see the defects of natural religion nobly made up; we have a great Mediator set forth, that satisfies offended justice, removes the guilt and power of sin, and brings sinners into favor with God, and to eternal feli- city; and in him all men are called to believe and trust for obtain- ing these blessed ends. And this is the Lord Jesus Christ. — In the Old Testament he is foretold and promised as the Messiah that was to come; in the New Testament he is revealed as come, and the time and manner of his coming narrated. He came in due time, according to the Old Testament predictions, exactly answering all its types, prophecies, and promises, in his divinity PREFACE. vii and humanity ; in his threefold office of Prophet, Priest, and King; and in his twofold state of humiliation and exaltation. So tliat, if Jesus Christ were not the true Messiah and Saviour of men, the oiorious promises of the Old Testament, concerning the Messiah, must be all delusion, seeing their fulfilment was limited within periods of time which are long since past. Our Messiah came not in the grandeur of an earthly monarch, as the carnal Jews expected, but as King of Zion, intending a spiritual monarchy in the world ; and, to instruct in his sovereign- ty and power in the kingdom of grace, he shewed his dominion in the kingdom of nature, (which earthly kings can't do) by opening the. eyes of the blind, the ears of the deaf, and the mouth of the dumb; by raising the dead, casting out devils, and miraculously liealing all sorts of diseases; yea, he gave power to his disciples to do the like, and to speak all languages of a sudden, without learning them; and to preach in them with such promptness and convincing energy, that their words pierced the conscience, and changed the minds and lives of men. Their doctrine did not fa- vor the lusts and corruptions of men, nor had the force of human laws or arms to promote it, like the Mahometan religion; but on the contrary, Christianity had all these against it: yet, in opposi- tion to ail these, it spread with astonishing success and rapidity through the world, so that, betore the death of the apostles, there was not a corner of the Roman empire, but had store of its pro- fessors. And though all the powers of earth and h«ll contended with fire and sword against the Christian religion, yet within less than three hundred years the whole known world was conquered by it. And seeing this triumphant success was not owing to the might, art, oreloquence of man, we must conclude it was brought about by the extraordinary power of that mighty God, who is the author of this holy religion. Such was theevidenceof the apostles'* testimony, and their sue- cessors in the primitive times, that not only the vulgar, but many of the best sense, wisdom, and learning, were overcome by it, and heartily embraced their doctrine, even when they had no prospect but of the greatest sufferings for so doing: such were Dionysius, Polycarp, Justin Martyr, Athenagorus,Tertullian, Origen, Clem- ens Alexandrinus, and many others. Surely nothing but the power of truth, which they evidently saw was countenanced by heaven, and confirmed by miracles, could have prevailed with such learned and curious enquirers to hazard the loss of all things dear to them, by embracing Christianity. But that I may come more closely to that proof which is most convincing of all, let it be considered, that the truth and verity (of which our Catechism is a compend) doth depend on the truth af a matter of fact, which (blessed be God) is better vouched and viii PREFACE. attested to us, than any fact in the world, that we have not seen with our eyes. Wherefore, if the fact be true and certain, that such a person as Jesus Christ was born at Bethlehem in the reign of Augustus the Roman emperor, when the sceptre of power was departing from Judah; and that about thirty years afterwards, in the reign of the Emperor Tiberius, this person Jesus Christ be- gan to preach in Judea, where he travelled some years, lived a most holy life, wrought great miracles, foretold many events, and a- mongst others his own death and resurrection; and, according as he said, so he died, and rose again upon the third day: I say, if all this be certain fact, what reason have we to question but this person had a divine mission, and was the very person he gave out himself to be, and that the doctrine he taught, and instructed his disciples to teach, was the very truth? That the facts above related are certain, we have the best evi- dence: for they are attested by many persons of great probity and candour, who Vv-ere eye witnesses to what they assert; and these witnesses all agree in the same testnuony, and continued adhering t^iereto unto their last breath, notwithstanding of the sufferings & cruel deaths they were exposed to for owning these things. And not only they, but also several Jewish and Pagan writers, who lived in or near these times, do confirm the truth of the principal facta concerning Jesus Christ which we have recorded in the New Tes- tament; nay, the fiercest enemies of Christ in the ancient ages never presumed to deny the facts. So that for any person to call in questioR the truth of facts so well attested, would be to destroy the truth and credibility of all history. As the facts contained in the New Testament have the fullest testimony that any ancient history can have, so it is very confirm- ing to us, that all the eight writer's of the New Testament do agree so exactly in their testimony without variation or contradiction. — Tho' those of them who write the historical part, do relate different circumstances of facts, and of miracles, not mentioned by others (which only shews they do not write by concert), yet they all a- gree in the matter: they give all the same account of Christ's birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension: they agree with all the rest in their accounts of Christ's doctrine, and of the way of sinners' salvation by faith in Christ's righteousness, and by the vir- tue of his blood. To confirm this doctrine, many miracles v;ere wrought by Christ and his apostles: and, that there might be no suspicion of fraud, these were done openly in sight of aU the people, and in presence of learned men, Christ's enemies, and these miracles were oft re- peated, and that for many years, and had lasting effects upon those whom they were wrought. And as for that great confirming miracle which Christ frequently referred to in his life for proof of his Messiah- PREFACE. ix Bhipfto wit, his rising from the dead, it was well attested by his many appearances after it to his disciples assembled together, yea, to five hundred of them at once, to whom the apostle Paul in his writings appealed for the truth of it, whilst most of them were alive. Yea, he not only appeared to them, but also taught them after his re- surrection: and for their fuller satisfaction, he ate and drank with them: nay, he shewed them the print of his wounds, and caused them to touch and handle his body. It is to be observed, that Christ's disciples began openly to preach his resurrection, within a few weeks thereafter, in that very city where it happened, and even in face of those who put him to death; and no man attempted to disprove what they said, which his violent enemies wanted not will to do if they could. Nay, the truth of Christ's resurrection was so notorious in that coun- try, that many thousands presently believed thedisciples' testimo- ny, embraced their doctrine, and became Christians. And as the disciples proclaimed Christ's resurrection every where, so they contirmed the truth of it with miracles wherever they came, and kept always the first day of the week in remembrance of it. These things, being certain facts, do clearly demonstrate to me, not only the truth of Christianity, but also the amazing unreasonableness of infidelity; and that instead of free or just thinking, it doth ar- gue the greatest thoughtlessness in those who give place to it. Object. We in this age never saw Christ or his apostles, nor a- ny of their miracles; no man now hath the gift of tongues; we have none of these miracles now repeated for our confirmation. Anstver. 1. The only wise God thought Christ's bodily pres- ence and these miracles to be necessary at the first planting of Christianity, when its doctrines were new to the world, and things opposite to it were to be abolished; but doth not think fit to con- tinue them now, when no new doctrine or way of worship is pro- posed, but only the very same inculcated which Christ and his a- postles had taught. 2. If miracles were ordinarily repeated, they would lose the use and force of miracles, which lies in their being extraordinary; for, if ihey were frequently repeated, they would become God's ordinary works, and not to be regarded by us. 3. Tho' Christ at his ascension, left the earth, and his apostles are gone, so that we see them not, nor the miracles they wrought for the confirmation of our faith; yet, by the evidences which re- main, we may be as well assured of them as if we had seen them ; and, in regard we are so much attached to things visible, our as- cended Jesus, in liis gracious condescension to the weakness of our faith, hath left us seven or eight visible testimonies, or occu- lar demonstrations of the truth and certainty of these doctrines and facts which are the foundations of our faith; as, Christ's hi- X PREFACE. carnation, his Living and Teaching in this world, with his Cruci- fixion and Resurrection. And, to confirm us the more in the be- lief of these blessed truths, God in Ijis mercy continues still be- fore our eyes several standing witnesses of them, namely, 1 . The writings of the apostles and evangelists, who were eye and ear witnesses of what they testify 2. The honourable name which we bear of Christians, being that which the followers of Christ soon got, after h.is leaving the world 3. The beginning of the Christian sera, or computation of years from the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ, is directed by wise Providence to put us in mind, every time we write, read or mention the present year, or any other year, that it is just so many years since our glorious Redeemer came in the flesh to save lost sinners 4. The con- tinuance of a gospel-ministry, according to Christ's institution, to declare the aforesaid trutiis and facts to the world 5. The frequent dispensing of baptism, for the initiation of his disciples, as Christ hath appointed 6. The administrationof the Lord's supper, in commemoration of his death and sufferings 7. Tiie weekly observation of the Lord's day in remiCmbrance ofiiis re- surrection. These seven lasting monuments, being as old as the profession of Christianity, have continued by the providence of God, descending through all ages for these seventeen hundred years past, as visible witnesses of the truth of it, that all men, hav- ing them daily before their eyes, may consider them as so many pledges ef the facts, doctrines, and institutions of the New Testa- ment. To all which 1 may add an e/^/t^A visible witness, viz. the pres- ent scattered condition of the Jewish nation over all the world, and yet never mixed with other nations so as to be lost among them. This strange preservation of them these 1700 years as a distinct people, amidst their many direful calamities, sutFerings and scatterings, is a wonderful instance of the interposition of divine Providence, that keeps them as a standing memorial every whereto the world of the certainty of scripture prophecies and miracles, and particularly of the New Testament history of the incarnation, life and death of Jesus Christ, and of the truth of his predictions concerning that people. • Likewise, the continuance of the Jewish nation, in such a dismal distinguished situation, doth point them out to the world as a lasting monument of the di- vine anger for their woful rejecting and crucifying of the blessed Messiah and Saviour of tiie world. Now all these outward visi- ble things God in his wisdom and mercy hath placed before our eyes, to confirm us the more in the belief of the facts and doc- trines contained in the books of the New Testament. Quest. How do we know that the books ofthe New Testament PREFACE. xi sre written by the apostles and evangelists, and that they are still the same as they wrote them, without alteration ? Ansiv. We are well assured these books are writtten by those whose names they bear, and that they are still the same they were at first, not only because of God's watchful providence over them, but in regard of these clear evidences: 1. The writers ofthe f.rst and second centuries, as Justine, Ireneus, Clemens, &c. do cite these books under the names they still bear; they quote texts from them as they stand in our Bibles, and make use of them in the same sense that we do; yea, Tertulian sometimes appeals to the original manuscripts of these books, which were preserved to his time (being then about the two hundredth year of Christ) and long after, as other writers attest. 2. These books could not be alter- ed, because of the vast number of copies that were transcribed, and in different languages, and soon dispersed, with Christianity Itself, through all parts of the known world; and yet still we find all these copies, however distant in place, or different in language, exactly agreeing together in sense. 3. Soon after the apostles' death, there arose many different sects of Christians of opposite sentiments, who yet all appealed to these writings for the support of their opinions : and surely these would never agree together to falsify them; neither did one side ever accuse the other of do- ing it. And for the books of the Old Testament, which greatly support the facts and doctrines of the New, and were themselves also confirmed by miracles: the Jews were careful, even to supersti- tion, to preserve these pure and uncorrupted, placing much of their religion in numbering how oft such and such words and letters recurred in the particular books. And tho' Christ reproved that people for many things wrong among them, yet he never accused them of falsifying any thing in these writings. Moreover, we have such visible marks of the divine original of the whole Bible, in the antiquity of its histories, the accomplish- ment of its prophecies, the purity of its precepts, the harmony of Its different parts, and the excellency of its design, as cannot but be very convincing and satisfying to all thinking persons.— Whence could we have had such a book as the Bible, written by so many different hands, and yet all aiming at the same desio-n, namely, To glorify God, to lead souls to Christ, to promote holi- ness, and to root out sin and vice? Who else but God could be Its author? A bad man or angel it could not be, seeing all the books and parts of it declare most warmly for truth and virtue, and against all manner of vice, and particularly against all Iving and dissimulation : a good man or angel it could not be. seeing it could never consist with their grace and goodness to dissemble, xil PREFACE. and counterfeit God's name in such a way, by putting, Thussaiih the Lord, to a book of their own devising. Lastly, Besides these convincing external evidences, there are many thousands in the world who have satisfying inward evidence, and experimental demonstration of the truth and excellency of the gospel- revelation, from the effects of it in their souls, through the concurrence of the Spirit of God: for thereby their proud minds have been humbled, their revengeful spirits made meek and for- giving, their carnal hearts njade to love God and mind heaven above all things; their loose and uncircumspect lives have become just, holy, pious and devout; and in attending upon Christ's in- stitutions, they have attained to great peace and joy in believing on him. And, for my own part, I would not exchange the inward satisfaction and complacency I have sometimes had in going in with the gospel-method of salvation, and resting my soul upon a crucified Jesus, with any king's crown in the world. And what can be more confirming than feeling or taste? It will not be ea- sy to persuade a man that honey is not sweet, who hath tasted it once and again. If the Holy Spirit would please to come and concur with the gospel-revelation by his gracious operations on the soul, it would be the most effectual way to establish us in the belief of the truth of the Christian religion, and to fortify us against all temptations to infidelity. Wherefore, that truth may prevail, and error evanish, may the Spirit be poured out from on high, as in former times'. Amen. A Word to Christian Pareiit<$, And all tcho have the charge of Children or Sei'va7itSj especially these in Dundee. Mr DEAR FRIENDS, The care of precious souls is a great trust committed to you by God, and to him you are accountable for it. The mstruction of youth is not to be left wholly to ministers, to school-masters, or mistresses. No! parents ought to be instilling good principles into children, and masters into servants, as they have occasion, which might serve to leave abiding impressions on them many years thereafter; and so ye would become felloiv-helpers of the truth, as in 3 John 8. Pray, don't think this is left to your op- tion, to do it or not as you please: No; you are under an express divine command, O parents, to bring up your children in the ad' monition of the Lord, that is, in teaching them the knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ, Eph. vi. 4, The word translated adnioni' tion, properly signifies catechising. Likewise tlie word which is rendered train up^ Pror. xxii. 6, signifies io catechise a child when PREFACE. xiii ( he is young. The command which God gave to the Israelites, to teach his will and statutes to their children, is still binding on you, Deut. vi. 7. Thou shalt teach them diligently unto thychil' dreiif and shalt talk of them ichen thou sittest in thine house and ivhcn thou liestdown, and ichcn thou risest up, Abraham had a strong sense of his duty in this respect; and therefore he not only taught, but commanded, both his children and servants to keep the ways of the Lord, Gen. xviii. 19. And can we expect to land in Abraham's bosom, if we tread not in Abraham's footsteps? O fellow-christians! Your listing yourselves and your children at baptism under Christ's banner, obligeth you to use your best endeavors to enlarge the borders of his kingdom, and to ruin the empire of darkness. You pray that his kingdom may come; and this binds you to choose the best means to obtain what you pray for, namely, To instruct the rising generation in the knowledge of Christ. This would make your piety extend to ages to come; for your example herein may be a motive to them to tread in the same steps, and so one generation will thus teach another. Do you yourselves know the joyful sound of salvation through our glorious Surety, and will ye not desire to make others know it too? You ought to say with the four lepers,, Avhen they found plenty in the Syrian camp, It is a day of good tidings , ivc do not well to hold our peace, 2 Kings vii. 9. This is a godhke disposi- tion, and would make you resemble God himself; for when he saw the world perishing in darkness, he pitied them, and came himself in our nature to teach them the way of salvation. For your help in this work, you have the Shorter Catechism of this church, which contains an excellent sciieme, both of the prin- ciples of religion which you are to believe, and of the duties of re- ligion which you are to practice. And though smaller ones, such as the Mother'^s Catechism, may be useful as introductory to it; yet, when children and servants are capable, it is necessary that they get our Shorter Catechism by heart: which you may cause them to do, by prescribing so much of it to them every week, until they come to have it throughout. And, because it is short and most comprehensive, 1 have framed the following Explanatory Cate- chism upon it, for your assistance in catechising these under charge, whereby you may be helped to open up to them at large the precious truths of our holy religion, and so prepare them the better for the public catechising, which would make the work of ministers pleasant and delightful to them. And, because the answers in the following Catechism are gen- erally short, it will not be a very hard task for young persons of good memories to get the most of them by heart, and to repeat them. And for those whose memories are weaker, it would be very instructing to them frequently to read over this book; for B xiv PREFACE. thereby they might soon be capable to answer satisfyingly mosst of the questions in it, though in other words than these in the book. It would also make children better acquainted with the scriptures, if their teachers would require them to give an account of some of the texts cited therein, which have not the words set down. If heads of families would convene their children and ser- vants every Sabbath-evening, and make use of this book, or the like explication, going over at one time ttco questions of the Shorter Catechism^ or thereby, with the explanatory catechising thereupon, you would go over the whole book thus once every year: and the following method may be observed. Let the master or mistress of the family ask the question of the Shorter Catechism, and let the answer be returned without book by one of the family; and then let that person take the book, and ask the first explanatory question upon it at his next neighbor, who may read the answer from the book if he can't repeat it; and then let him who answer- ed ask the second explanatory question at his neighbor, who is to answer it as before; and then ask the next question at his neigh- bor, and so on; the rest in the mean time attending and going along with the person reading or repeating, with their several books if they have them, or else making use of their neighbor's, by which their thoughts, which are apt to wander, will be the more fixed and intent upon what they are about. And to conclude, let me likewise humbly intreat young persons diligently to improve all such helps and means of instruction in the season of youth, and carefully to prepare for and attend all diets of catechising whether in private or public, and hearken with delight to parents, masters, or ministers, who would teach them the things which concern their everlasting peace. O consider, how many young people are hurried into eternity before they know and lay these things to heart! Believe it, dear Sirs, there is no heaven without Christ, no interest in Christ without faith, and no faith without knowledge. May therefore the earth be filled with the knowledge of Christ as the waters cover the sea ! Amen. Dundee, Uih April, 1737. AN EXAMPUB OP PLAI1¥ CATECHISI]\Gj &c. Quest. 1. WHAT is the chief end of man P •Ans, Man's chief end is, to glorify God^ and to enjoy him forever. Q. What do you mean by marl's chief end ? A. The main thing which man should intend and aim at in his living in the world, and look upon as the great design of his creation. Q. yVhat is that great and chief end ? A In the answer it is branched out into two parts; the principal end being to glorify God, and the less principal to enjoy him for ever. Q. Can man add any thing to God?s essential glory? A. No; for, that being infinite^ no addition can be made to it. Q. How can we glorify God? A. By declaring and shewing forth his glory before the world. Q. How may we do that ? A. By acknowledging God's perfections; by adoring and trust- iKg him; by praising him with our lips, and ordering our conver- sation according to his word. Psalm 1. 23. Q. HoiD are we said to give glory to God by confessing our sins, as in Josh. vii. 19? A. Because, by so doing, we own God to be infinite in knowl- edge, from whom no secrets can be hid, and injustice, though lie should proceed to punish us for our sins. Q. W her cf ore should we maJce it our chief end to glorify God ? A. Because of the infinite obligations we are under to God. as being our almighty Creator, our gracious Preserver, and merciful Redeemer. When is it that we eat and drink for the glory of God, as the apostle directs, 1 Cor. x. 3 1 ? A, When we do it in obedience to God's command, for preser- ving life and health, that we may be capable to honor and serve God here below. Q. May not other creatures declare the glory of God, as well as man? 16 OF MAN'S CHIEF END. A, Yes; the heavens do it, Psalm xix. 1. as they shew forth the glory of God's wisdom and power in an objective and passive manner; but none can do it actively, but rational creatures. Q. Do all men make it their chief end to glorify God? A. No; for many men, instead of glorifying God, do wofuUy dishonor him. Q. Who are these? A. They who forget God, or disobey his laws. Q. Who are they that forget God? A. They who do not pray to God, nor praise him for his mer- cies; and they who are formal in his worslnp, and do not remem- ber his word. Q. What will become of those ivho forget God? A. It is said, Psal. ix. 17. " they shall be turned into hell." Q. Did God make all things for his own glory? A. Yes. Q. If men do not make this their end, will God lose his end of making them ? A. No; for if God be not glorified by them, he will glorify him- self upon them, even his justice, in their destruction, Prov. xvi. 4. Q. Is it not lawful to aim at lower ends than God'^s glory; as for a man to be diligent in his calling, for the end that he may provide for himself and family? A. Yes; but these lower ends must be intended in subordinate to man's chief and ultimate end, the glory of God. Q. Do we not promote our oxen happiness, by making God'^s glory our chief end? A. Yes; and therefore glorifying God, and enjoying him for ever, are connected in the answer. Q. Must we study to glorify God on earth, if we would enjoy Imn in heaven? ' A. Yes. Q. Are we able of ourselves to glorify God? A. No, tlie fall hath disabled us; but by Christ and his grace we may be strengthened to do it in some nriCasure. Q. What is it to enjoy God ? A, It is to possess God's love and favor, or to be blessed with his gracious presence. Q. And doth man"* s true happiness lie in this? A. Yes. Q. May not a man thus enjoy God upon earth ? A. Yes; the saints have God's gracious presence in some meas- ure in his ordinances here below, but they will enjoy God in an- other manner in heaven. Q. What is the difference betwixt our enjoying God here, and hereafter? A. Our enjoyment of God here is very short and imperfect; but in heaven, it will be everlasting, full and immediate. It is OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 17 fliere the saints shall see Mm as he is, and be like him, and he ever with the Lord, 1 John iii. 2. 1 Thess. iv. 17. Q, Why doth our chief happiness lie in the enjoying of God? A. Because God, being the chiefest good, and infinite in his perfections, can only satisfy the boundless desires of our immor- tal sodls. H^ is a portion that suits both their spiritual nature, and perpetual duration, Psalm Ixxiii. 25, 26. Q, How shall we attain to the enjoyment of God? A. We must receive Christ the Mediator, live the life of faith and self-denial, study purity of heart and life, and be much in th© exercise of prayer and praise. Q, What is the chief end or design of wicked men ? A, To gratify their sensual appetites, and to enjoy the best things this world affords. Q. Can the enjoyment of the world'^s good things viake ii^ happy? A. No; for^ as they suit not ihe soul's demands, so they are too short and uncertain to afford us any solid satisfaction. Q. Can wicked men expect to enjoy God hereafter? A. No; for they who shall enjoy God above, must be made -meet for it here below. Q. Who are meet to enjoy God? A. Those who are sanctified. Q. What will become of those who miss ihe enjoyment of God in heaven? A. Their portion will be in hell with hypocrites and unbelie- vers. Q. When should a man begin to think seriously of his chief end? A. In the days of youth, Eccl. xii. 1. Q. May loe not delay it until some convenient time afterwards? A. No; for there is no time so convenient — and ihe time which we propose may never come, seeing death surpriseth very many, Luke xii. 20. Q. When must we have done glorifying God f A. Never, Q. Will that ever be thought a tedious task? A. No; for it is the delight of gracious souls to do the will of God; and therefore, in the most happy place, it is said, There hi* servants shall serve him. Psalm xl. 8. Rev. xxii. 3. Quest. 3. What rule hath God given to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him P •dins. The word of God, which is contained in the Scriptures oftbe Old and New Testament, is the only ffule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him* B 2 18 OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. Q. How is this question connected rvith the preceding f A. As the former shews tlie end of our creation, so this points out the rule or means of attaining to that end, viz. the scriptures. Q. Why do we call tlie Wo7-d of God the Scriptvres? A. We call God's word the Scriptures, that is, Writings, by way of eminence; because they are the most valuable and useful writings in the world. Q. Why are these writings called the Word of God? A. Because God either spake them himself, or ordered men to write them. Q. Is not Christ called the Word likewise ? A. Yes; but Clirist is the essential Word of God, and the Bi- ble is only the written word of God. Q. ^Vhy is Christ called the word of God? A. Because he is the express image of his Father, as our words are the image or picture of our hearts. Q. Seeing the Bible is mostly spoken and written by menj is it not more j)roperly the words ofiiien, than of God? A. No; for though it bespoken and written by holy men, yet they did it, not according to their own will or wisdom, but as they were inspired and moved thereto by the Holy Ghost, 2 Pet. i. 21. Q. Who teas the first penman of the holy scriptures? A. Moses. Q. What imrt of them did he irrite ? A. The first five books, to wit: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Q. Whctt remarkable things doth his first book contain? A. The history of the creation of the world, of man's fall, of the world's destruction by the- flo6d, and many signal transac- tions with respect to the church for above two thousand years before Moses was born. Q. If there were no icritings before him, hoxo could he he cer- tified of the truth of these things? A. By divine revelation, as well as human tradition. Q. Why did God order his word to be wriiteri ? A. That his church might have a fixed and standing rule of faith and practice for all future ages, and might not be imposed on by uncertain traditions, Q. How cpuld the church subsist, and religion be kept pure for so long a time before Moses, when there 2vas 720 writt^-nirord? A. By reason of the few families to which the church was then confined, the long lives of the godly patriarchs, and the frequent appearances of God unto them in dreams, visions, and audible voices; and also by sending his angels unto them. Q. By what arguments do you prove that the Scriptures are OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 19 (he word of God, and that they were written by divine inspira- tion ? A, By the holiness of the matter of them, the heavenliness of the style, the harmony of the different parts, the efficacy of the doctrine on the soul, the many miracles wrought in confirmation of them, and the joyful sufferings of martyrs for them. Q. Is there not something else, that is more effectual to per^ suade us of the divinity of the scriptures^ than all these argu- ments ? A. Though these be sufficient to convince men of reason, and to stop the mouths of gainsayers, yet it is the Spirit of God bearing witness by and with the scriptures in our hearts, that only can establish us in the belief of the scriptures being the very word of God, John xvi. 13, Q. How are the scriptures divided ? A. Into two parts, to wit, the scriptures of the Old and New Testament. Q. Why are they called a Testament? A. Because they contain God's will concerning the salvation of sinners, as it was revealed and confirmed by Christ the testa- tor; and this will is either called a testament or covenant. Q, Do the scriptures of the Old and New Testament contain two testaments or covenants? A. No; they both hold forth one and the same covenant of grace for substance, seeing we find the same Mediator, and the same way of salvation through faith in him, pointed at in both: But the circumstances and forms of administering this covenant bemg so very different, it is disiinguished into the Old and New Testament, or the old and new covenant of grace. Q. IT hy are the scriptures in the former part of the Bible called the Old Testament? A. Because they contain the old dispensation of the covenant of grace before Christ's coming in the flesh, which was by mani- fold rites, prophecies, types and sacrifices, all prefiguring the Messiah then to come. Q. Why are the scriptures in the latter part of the Bible cal- led the NeiD Testament? A. Because they set forth the new dispensation of the cove- nant, by Clirist's coming in the flesh to fulfil the types and fig- ures of the Old Testament, and instituting a more spiritual wor- ship in the room thereof, and revealing his grace more clearly and extensively to the world. Q. Hoiv could the first part of the Bible have the force of a testament^ while it was not confirmed by the death of the testator? A, It was confirmed by Christ's death typically in the slain sacrifices, on which account Christ is called the " Lamb slain 20 OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. from the foundation of the world." And the blessings of the Old Testament, being disponed to believers, in view of the actu- al death of the testator, prefigured by the slaying of the sacrifi* ces, were, upon their believing, made good to them. Q. Are the scriptures of the Old Testament a part of our rule, as well as the New? A. Yes; for they express much of Christ and bis Gospel: they contain the moial law, and are often cited in the New Testament, Matt. xxii. 29, &c. John v. 39. Acts xvii. 11. Rom. xv. 4. 1 Cor. x. 6. Heb. iv. 2. Gal. iii. 8. Q. Are the writings in the Apocrypha boohs to be read and received as the word of God? A. No; for though they are useful, as many other human wri- tings, yet they are not part of the holy scriptures; seeing we find they are not written in the original language of tiie Old Testa- ment, nor by any of the inspired prophets, but after Malachi, who was the last of them: nor were they owned as canonical by the Jews, to whom of old were committed the oracles of God. Q. Doth the authority of the scriptures depend upon the testi- mony of the church? A. No; for the church herself is built on the scriptures as her foundation, and whatever the church teachetii is to be tried by them, Eph. ii. 19, 20. Isa. viii. 20. Acis xvii. IL Q. Is there nothing else to be received as a rule to direct us in the 2vay to happiness, but the holy scriptures? A. No: not our natural reason, as Deists assert; not unwritten traditions, as Papists teach; not the light within, or spirit with- out the scriptures,- as Quakers and enthusiasts pretend to, Isa. viii. 20. Gal. vi. 16. 1 John iv. 1, 6. Q. Why is not the light of nature or reason sujicient to direct us in the ivay to happiness? A. Because, though it teach us that there is a God, and that he is to be worshipped, yet it cannot discover to us the wonderful work of redemption through Jesus Christ. Q. But is the word of God suficiently plain, full, and perfect, to be a rule to usf A. Whatever Papists object against it, to make way for their traditions and papal decrees, yet the rule of God's word is suffi- ciently plain and complete, as it contains the whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary for us to know or believe, for promoting God's glory and our salvation. And this we have either in express words, or in just and necessary consequences, obvious to the weakest understanding, 2 Tim. iii. 15, 16, 17. — Psalm xvi. 7, 8, 9, and cxix. 105, 130. Q. Do the scriptures then contain the whole revealed will of JGod to the world? it. Yes. OF THE SCOPE OF THE SCRIPTURES. ei Q. Are we to believe nothing hut what we have written in the word of God? A, Yes, many thinofs, though not as necessary to salvation. Q, Is the word of God to be observed as our rule of worship, as well as of faith? A. Yes. Q. Is it not lawful for us to add some decent inventions to the worship of God, as the sign of the cross in baptism, hneeling at the Lord^s supper, bowing to the altar, the organ in praise? A. No; not a pin sliould be added to the tabernacle, but what is of God"'s own appointment, Heb. viii, 6. Q. What doth the apostle call such inventions and additions? A. Besgarly elements, and will-worship. Gal. iv. 9. Col. ii. 23. Q. What will God say to those who add them ? A. He will say to them as to the Jews, Isa. i. 12: " Who hatb required these things at your hands?"" Q. HoiD should we value the scriptures ? A. We should reckon it a great mercy and privilege that we have God's will revealed in them, as a light to gtiide us in the way to heaven; and therefore we sliould dearly love them, and daily use them. Q. Are they not in a miserable case who want the scriptures? A. Yes; for where there is no vision the people perish, Prov. xxix. 18. Q. Will the word save any without the Spirit'' s influence? A. No. Q . What will become of those who have the word, and yet des^ pise it ? A. They will be destroyed, Prov. xiii. 14. Quest. 3. what do the Scriptures principally teach P Jlns, The Scriptures principally teacli what man is to believe conceniing God, and wliat duty God requires of man. Q. What are the two great lessons which the scriptures teach us? A. The scriptures teach us, first, The truths we must believe. Secondly, the duties we mast perform. Q. Why is faith put before obedience? A. Because faith is the spring and principal of all true obedi- ence, and no duty can be performed acceptably without it, Heb. xi. 6. Q. What do the scriptures teach us to believe concerning God? 22 OF GOD. A. Three things; as, 1. That God is. 2. What God is. 3. What God doth. And therefore we should aim to grow in the knowledge and belief of the being, the nature, and the works of God. Q. Ought we not in the first place to study to be established in the belief of the being of a God? A. Yes. Q, How doth it appear there is a Godl A, This is evident, not only from the Bible, but also from the light of nature, the works of creation, the being of the heavens, earth, and sea, with the various creatures therein; the beautiful order and motion of the luminaries) of heaven, the regular eb- bing and flowing of the sea, the wonderful frame of man's body and soul, the miracles which have been wrought, the prophecies which have been fulfilled, the consent of all nations to this truth, and the conscience of man, which accuses him when guilty, and excuses him when innocent: All these do plainly declare the be- ing of God, to the confounding of all those who would oppose this most clear and evident trull). Q. HoiD do we call those who think there is no God? A. We call them Atheists. Q. What doth the Spirit of God call them? A. F«ols. Psalm xiv. 1. Q. Why are they called fools? A. Because what they imagine is contrary to the rational dic- tates of their own souls, and the common sentiments of all the ■wise and sober pan of mankind, and also against the testimony of every creature; seeing tlie being and wisdom of God may evi- dently be seen in every thing we set our eyes upon, as a bird, a fly, a tree, a flower, and every pile of grass. Quest. 4. What is God? Ans. God is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and un- changeable ; in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth. Q. Is it possible for creatures tQ gite any perfect definition of God? A. No. Q. Are mot all our uptaldngs of the nature and essence of God most imperfect ? A. Yes . Q. Why are they so ? A. Because the nature of God being spiritual and infinite, is so exalted above us, that he cannot be declared by human speech, perceived by human sense, or conceived of by human un- derstanding. Job xi. 7, 8, 9. Q. Jfhat sort of substance is God? OF GOD. 23 A. God is a Spirit, John iv. 24. Q. What is a spirit ? A. An invisible being or substance, that hath understanding and will, without a body or bodily parts, Luke xxiv. 39. Q. Are not angels and the souls of men spirits too? A. Yes, Q. What difference is there between God and these spirits? A. These are but finite spirits, created by God, and depend- ant upon him; but God is an uncreated Spirit, infinite and inde- pendent, who made all things according to his pleasure. Q. If God be a spirit^ hoio doth the scripture ascribe face, eyes, ears, mouth, hands and other bodily parts unto God. A. These are not proper, but only figurative expressions of God: for if God should speak in his own language, and describe himself to us, as he really is, we could not understand him ; there- fore he is pleased to speak of himself to us after the manner of men, in condescension to our weak capacities, who cannot con- ceive of the divine perfections and operations without such shad- ows and resemblances. Wherefore we must understand all these bodily parts in a spiritual sense. Q. What ought we to understand by them? A. By the face of God, we are to understand the manifestation of his favour; by his eyes, his omniscience and watchful provi- dence; by his ears, his readiness to hear our prayers; by hi3 mouth, the revelation of his will; by his hand or arm, the great- ness of his power; by his heart, the sincerity of his affection; by his bowels, ihe tenderness of his compassion; by his feet, the ubi- quity of his presence. Q. If God be a Spirit, how was man said to be created after the image of God. A. Tlie image of God in man did not consist in any bodily^ shape or likeness, but in the spiritual faculties and excellencies of his soul, in regard of its being a spirit, invisible, immortal, knowing, righteous, and holy. Q. Is it laiLful to represent God, who is a Spirit, by any im- age or picture, as the Papists pretend to do,for an help in wor- ship ? A. No; for, as it is impossible to do it, so it is most sinful to attempt it; seeing such mean representations are a great dispar- agenientto the majesty of an infinitely glorious God, and also a manifest contempt of his laws, which strictly forbid any such practice, Deut. iv. 15, 16. Isa. xl. 18. Acts xvii. 29. Q. How is it that God is described to us in the Catechism? A. By his essential properties, or excellencies which we find ascribed to God in scripture, commonly called his attributes. Q. How are the attributes of God divided? A. Into two sorts; some being incommunicable, -and others called communicable. €4 OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF GOD. Q. W'hat are the incommunicable attributes of God mentioned in the answer? A. They are three, to wit, his infinity, eternity, and unchange- ableness. Q. Why are these called incommunicable? A. Because they cannot be communicated to any creature; and there is no resemblance of them to be found in creatures. Q. iVhat are these attributes of God which arc called commu- nicable? A. Thfcy are six, to wit, his wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth. Q. VViy are these called communicable? A. Because there are some faint rays or resemblances of them to be seen in some creatures, as in good men and angels; and hence they are called wise, holy, just, good, &c. Q. What is it to be infinite ? A. It is to be without all measure, bounds, or limits. Q. In what respect is God said to be infinite? A. 1. In respect of his essence, greatness and glory; and so he is immense, unsearchable and incomprehensible. 2. He is infinite in his wisdom, power, and all the other perfections of his nature; no bounds can be set unto them. 3. In respect of place, being every-wliere present, and unbounded by any place. — 4. in respect of duration, being ciernal, and bounded by no time. Q. What understand you by God'^s being eternal? A, That he is without beginning, and without end; which no creature can pretend to: for though angels and men's souls have no end, yet they had a beginning; but God, who made them, is from everlasting to everlasting, Ps.al. xc. 2. Q. What do you nnd^/rstand by God\s being unchangeable ? A. That he is still the same, and subject to no variableness or change, either with respect to his essential perfections, or his counsels and designs, or his love and favor towards his people, Ps;»l. cii. 27. Isa. xlvi. 10. Rom. xi. 22. James i. 17. Q. If Gnl be unchangeable, how is repentance attributed to him in scripture, as Sex. xviii. and other places? A. Not properly, but improperly. God there speaks of himself after the manner of men, because he doth the same thing which men do when they repent and change their mind; he alters the course of his dispensations, but still without any change of coun- sels. For, whatever change appear in God's outward conduct, it is exactly according to his infallible prescience and immutable will ; and doth not import any change of mind in God, as it doth in us. Q. IVhat is meant by the wisdom of God? A, Thai essential perfection, whereby he perfectly knows all OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF GOD. 25 things?, and skilfully orders and disposes all things to their proper ends, for his own glory. Q. Wherein doth the tmsdom of God most hnghtly appear? A. God's wisdom shines forth both in his works of creation and providence; but the brightest discovery we have of it is in the contrivance of our redemption by Jesus Christ, in a way that both satisfies justice in the punishment of sin, and magnifies mercy in the salvation of the sinner, Psalm, civ. 24. Col. ii. 3. Q. llliat is the power of God? A. That essential property of God, whereby he is almighty, or able to do all things that he pleaseth to have done, Gen. xvii. 1 Jer. xxxii. 17. Q. We read of God, that he cannot lie, repent or deny himself: Jiow then is he able to do all things ? A. These things are no objects of power. The doing of them, being contrary to God's hoiy nature and veracity, would argue imperfection and weakness, but not power. Q. Wherein is God'^s almighty power discovered to us? A. In creating the world by his word, and upholding all things in it, in conquering the power of hell by Christ's death, in working miracles, raising the dead, converting sinners to himself, preser- ving his church, and subduing his enemies, Rom. i. 20. lieb. i. 3. 1 Cor. i.24. Epb. i. 19. IMatth. xvi. 18. Q. What is the holiness of God? A. That essential perfection, whereby he is infinitely pure, and free from all iniquity, loveth righteousness, and abhorreth all sin and impurity, Hab. i. 13. Q. fP herein doth God'^s holiness, and hatred of sin, appear ? A* In making pure and holy laws, encouraging men to obey them; threatening and punishing sin, which is contrary to them: and especially in sending his eternal Son to assume our nature and live in it, to be a pattern of holiness to us; and also to die, that he might extirpate sin and impurity, and purchase perfect ho- liness for us, Rom. vii. 12. 1 Thess. iv. 3. Eph. v. 25, 26, 27. Q. W hat is the justice of God ? A. It is the perfect equity of his nature, which inclines him to will what is just and right, to render to every man his due, and to deal righteously with all his creatures. Q. What discoveries have we of the Justice of Godi A. In sending terrible judgments upon men for their sins in this world, and executing eternal vengeance upon the wicked in hell; and in rewarding the righteous upon the account of Christ's mer- its, Rom. ii. 5, 6, &c. 2 Thess. i. 7, 8, 9. 2 Tim. iv. 8. Q. What is the greatest evidence of the justice of God, thai ever he gave to the world? A, His pouring out the vials of his wrath upon his own Son, C6 OF THE UNITY OF GOD. when he stood surely for us: and exacting full satisfaction from him for all the debts or sins of an elect world, without abating him one farthing, Jsa. liii. 4. Rom. iii.26, 26. Rom. viii.32. Q. Doth God''s infinite Justice hinder him from being mercl' A. No; for, through Christ's mediation, he exerts his infinite mercy and goodness to the world, as well as his justice, Q. Wherein doth the goodness and mercy of God appear? A. In our daily preservation, in supplying the wants of all his creatures, in sparing his enemies, and chiefly in providing Christ to be a surety for them, in offering them salvation through him, and particularly in pardoning, sanctifying and giving eternal glory to all who believe in him. Q. What is the truth of God? A. That essential property, which always inclines him to be sincere and true in what he saith, and to be faithful in fulfilling his word. Q, JV herein doth the tivth and faithfulness of God appear? A. Jfi accomplishing the predictions recorded in his word, in executing his threatenings against the wicked, and in fulfilling all his promises to his people, Matth. xxiv. 35. Zech. i. 6. Ileb. x. 23. ^ Q. Wherein do these perfections of wisdom, poicer, holiness^ justice, goodness and truth, which belong to God, differ from those we find in angels and men ? A. These perfections being essential to God, he is infinite, eternal and unchangeable in them: but any inferior degree of these perfections we see in creatures, the same is communicated from God to them, and is subjiect to change. Quest. 5. Jive there more Gods than one F dns. There is but one only, the living and true God. Q. In what respect is God said to he one? A^ God is one, 1st, In opposition to mixture and composition, he being a most pure and simple essence. 2dli/, In opposition to multitude, he being numerically one in essence and nature, and no other like him. Q Why is God said to he the one only God? A. To shew that though there be others that bear the name of gods in the world, yet there is none really God, but he alone, 1 Cor. viii. 4, 5, 6. Q. why is this one God called the living Godl A. To distinguish him from the dead idols of the nations, and to shew that all life, natural, spiritual and eternal, is originally in OF THE UNITY OF GOD. 27 him, and from him only, Psahn cxv. 4, 5, John v. 26. 1 Tim. vi. 13. Q. Why is he called the True Godi A. To distinguish him from all the false and imaginary deities that are in the world, Jer. x. 10, 11, 15. Q. Who are these mentioned in scripture that hear the name of godf besides the true God? A. We find several called gods, as the heathen idols, the devil, antichrist, and magistrates, 1 Cor. viii. 5. 2 Cor. iv. 4. 2 Thess. ii. 4. Psalm Ixxxii. 6. Q. Why are the heathen idols called gods? A. Not that there is any thing of true divinity in them, but be- cause their deluded worshippers fancied that they were gods, and reputed them so. Q. Can any of the gods among the heathen give rain ? A, No, Jer. xiv. 22. Q. Can they create a world, or know the heart? A, No; they cannot, and therefore ought not to be worshipped. Jer. X. 11. Q. HotD is the devil called god ? A, He is called the god of this world, because he rules over the unregenerate world; he usurps divine homage, and is actually worshipped in many parts by the heathen, 2 Cor. iv. 4, Deut. xxxii. 17, Rev. ix. 20. Q. How is antichrist called god? A. In respect of his usurping the titles, homage and preroga- tives which are only due to God, 2 Thess. ii. 4. Q. How are magistrates called gods ? A. Only improperly, and by participation ; they being God's vicegerents on earth, to minister justice toothers, Psalm Ixxxii. 6. Q. Do not some make the world their god? Ji. Yes; and hence covetous men are called idolaters, Eph. v. 5. Col. iii. 5. Q. Why are they called so? A. Because ihey set their hearts upon the world more than up- on God. Q. Do not some make a god of their belly? .4. Yes; Phil. iii. 19. Q. How are they guilty of this? A, By studying to serve and please the belly more than God. Q. How do you prove that thereis hut one God, and no more? A, First, From holy scripture, that doth frequently assert this; as in Deut. vi. 4. Mai. ii. 10. Matth. xix. 17. 1 Cor. viii. 4. 6. Secondly, From reason; for. seeing God is an infinite, om- nipotent, independent, and most perfect being, and also the first 28 OF THE PERSONS OF THE GODHEAD. cause of all things, reason must certainly conclude that there can be but one such being, and no more, and that there cannot be a plurality of infinites and first causes. Q. T'T7iO are they that are guilty of muUiplying gods to them' selves ? A. Both the Pagans and Papists, seeing they actually worship and pray to others beside the one true Godj so do the Papists to saints and angels. Q. Hut may not prof essed Protestants be chargeable with mul' tiplying gods to themselves 7 A. Yes; for though they profess to own and worship the one true God; yet many set up idols in their hearts, an(i study to serve and please other things more than God, Ezek. xiv. 3. Phil. iii. 19. ■ Q,' What is incumbent on us, when others will not worship and serve this one true God? A. We should, vvith Johua, resolve and say, that we and ours will serve the Lord, Josh. xxiv. 15. ,Q. Doth any man serve God for nought? A. No; for he rewards all his faithful servants with a crown of life, Rev. ii. 10. Quest. 6. How many persons are there in the God^ Mad? Ans, There are three persons in tlie Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost : And these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in pow- er and glory, Q. what is meant by the Godheadl A. The divine nature or essence. Q. Is this word Godhead to be found in scripture? A. Yes, in Acts xvii. 29. We ought not to think the Godhead is like unto gold or silver, &c. Q. Are there three essences or natures in the Godhead? A. No, but only three persons in one divine essence. Q. How do you prove that there' are three persons in the God' head? A. First, From that express assertion, 1 John v. 7. " For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one." ^dly, From the in- stitution of baptism, Matt, xxviii. 1 9. " Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing ihem in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost/'' 3dly, From the apostolical benediction, 2 Cor. xiii. 14 . " The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost be with you all.*' Amen. OF THE PERSONS OF THE GODHEAD. 29 Q. What do you think of that proof of the Trinity which is brought from Christ'^s baptism at Jordan? Matt. iii. 16, 17. A. It is most clear; for there the Father is manifested by a voice from heaven, the Son by his bodily appearance upon earth, and the Holy Ghost by lighting on him in shape of a dove. Q. Ji ell, then, is the Father God— the Son God — and the Holy Ghost God? A. Yes; each one of thera is God. Q. Will not that maJce three Gods? A. No; these three persons are but one God; because the same divine nature or essence is in all the three. Q. What mean you by a person in the Godhead? A. It is the divine nature subsisting in a different way, and dis- tinguished by different personal properties. Q. What are the different personal properties of the three persons in the Godhead? A. It is proper to the Father to beget the Son, and send out the Holy Ghost: it is proper to the Son, to be begotten of the Father, and to send out the Holy Ghost: it is proper to the Holy Ghost to proceed by emanation from the Father and the Son.; — All which appears from these scriptures, Ps. ii. 7, Heb. i. 5, 6, 8. John i. 14, 18, and xv. 26. Gal. iv. 6. Q. Is one of these persons before another in order of time? A. No; for they are co-eternal. Q. Is one of them before another in order of dignity or great- ness? A, No; for they ar€ all equal in power and glory. Q, Why then are they named in this order, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost? A. To denote the order of subsisting and working which they have among themselves; the Father subsisting and working from himself; the Son subsisting and working from the Father; and the Holy Ghost subsisting and working from the Fatlier and the Son, John V. 19. and xiv. 14. Q. Which of these three persons made the world? A. Each of them made it, as is evident from the scriptures, which ascribe the work of creation to all three, Gen. i. 1, 2, 26. Isa. xl. ii. 5. Heb. i*. 2. John i. 3. Col. i. 16. Job xxKiii. 4.— Psalm xxxiii. 6. Isa,xl. 12, 13. Q. \^hich of the three persons became man? A. The Son, who is the second person of the glorious Trinity; and since his incarnation, he is called the Lord Jesus Christ. Q. How doth it appear that Christ the Son of God, is eq^ml with the Father? A* From the holy scriptures, in which we find the same naraea, C 2 30 OF THE PERSONS OF THE GODHEAD. titles, attributes, works, worship and honour ascribed to the Son, as are ascribed to the Fatlier. Q. What are these essential names and titles which are ascrv- hcd to the Son equally as to the Father? A. Even those which are most eminent and glorious, such as God, the Lord God of the prophets, King of kings and Lord of lords, the great God, the mighty God, the true God, tlie only wise God, God over all blessed for ever. And also he is called Jehovah, which is the peculiar incommunicable name of the only true God. For all which see these i)lain texts, John i. L I Tim. iii. 16. Rev. xxii. 6, and xix. ]6. Tit. ii. 13. Isa. ix. 6. 1 John V. 20. Jude 25. Rom. ix. 5. Zech. ii. 10. Jer. xxiii. 6. Psalm Ixxxiii. 18. Q. What are the divine alirihzites ichich are ascribed to the So:i equally with the Father? A. The holy scripture asserts, that he is eternal, unchangea- ble, almighty, omniscient, omnipresent, infinite in holiness, jus- tice, goodness, and truth; as in these texts, Mic. v. 2. Heb. vii. 3. and xiii. 8. Rev. i. 8. John ii. 24. 25. and xxi. 17. Rev. ii. 23. Malt, xviii. 2). isa. vi. 3. Rev iii. 7, 2 Tim. iv. 8. Eph, iii. 19. Rev. i. 5. Q. What are those divine worhs ascribed to Christ the Sorty vjhich prove him to be the true God? A. The scriptures ascribe to him the creation of the world, the preservation and upholding of all things, the working of miracles by his own power, the forgiving of sins, the working of failh and repentance, the quickening of dead souls, the opening of the un- derstanding, bestowing of the Spirit, raising the dead at the last day, judgmg of the world, and giying-of eternal life, John i. 3. 10. Col. i. 16, 17. Heb. i. 3. Mark v.'41. and ii. 5. Heb. xii. 2. Acts v„ 31. John V. 21, 25, 28,- 29. Luke xxiv. 25. John xx. 22. Acts ii. 33. 2 Tim. iv. 1. John x. 28. Q. TT hat is that ivorship and honour ascribed to Christ the Son, which prove him to be the true God? A. We find the same religious divine worship and adoration given fo him as to the Father, both by angels and men. As also, he |l is made the object of faith, of prayer, of praise, and of sacramen- tal dedication, equally with the Father; as we see in these texts, Heb. i. 6. Matt. viii. 2. and xiv. 13. John xiv. 1. Acts vii, 59, 60. iCor. i. 2. Actsix 14.Rev. v. 12, 13.Matt.xxviii. 19. Acts xix. 5. Q. Is it not the Father''s express will that all men should hon- our the Son, even as they honour the Father? A. Yes; as in lohn v. 22, 23. Q. Doth not God the Father call Jesus Christ his Fellow, OT equal? A. Yes; as in Zech. xiii. 7. Q. Did not Christ thinh himself to be equal with him? OF THE PERSONS OF THE GODHEAD. 31 A. Yes; for it is said, He thought it no robbery to be equal witli God, Phil. ii. 6. Q^ If the Son he God equal with the Father, how saith Christ, My Father is greater than J? John xiv. 28. A. Christ doth not speak there of his divine nature; for, in res- pect of that, he and his Father are equally great: and therefore he saith, " I and my Father are one." And it cannot be otherwise, since one and the same infinitely great Godhead is the undivided nature of them both. But in the place objected, as the context shews, Christ doth speak of his mediatorial office to which he is appointed by the Father, and in which respect he is the Father's servant. Q, Is there not great absurdity in maintaining the Son to be in' ferior to the Father in respect of his divine nature? A Yes; for it would lead us into Polytheism, or the setting up of two gods, and two objer.ts of worship, the one supreme and the other subordinate; besides, it would make Christ no God in a proper sense; for inferiority or dependency is inconsistent with the notion of the Deity. Q. Hoic doth it appear that the Holy Ghost is God equal with the Father and the Son ? A. By the same arguments that prove the divinity of the Son : for the Holy Ghost hath the same names, attributes, works, worship and honour ascribed to him, which the Father and the Son have; he is called God, Jehovah; he is eternal, omniscient, omnipresent; he created ihe world, miraculously formed and furnished Christ's human nature, and inspired the prophets and the apostles; he rai- see the dead, regenerates and sanctifies his people; and he is the object of divine worship, of prayer, and sacramental dedication: for all which see these texts. Acts v. 3, 4. Ezek. iii. 24, 26. Heb. ix. 14. 1 Cor. ii. 10. Lukeii.26. Psalm cxxxix. 7, 8. Psalm xxxiii. 6. Job xxvi. 13. Matt. i. 18. Luke iv. 18. 2 Pet. i. 21. Rorn. viii, 11. John iii. 6. 2Thess. ii. 13. Cant. iv. 16. 2Cor.xiii. 14. Matt, xxviii. 19. Q. Do we not receive distinct blessings and benefits from these glorious persons ? A. Yes; the Father contrived the ransom, and sent the Ranso* mer: the Son undertook and came to be our Redeemer; and the Holy Ghost applies the redemption to us. Q. Ought not then a distinct glory to he given to each of the blessed Three? A, Yes; and this will be the work of the redeemed with the an- gels for ever. Rev. i. 4, 5, 6. and iv. 8, &c. and v. 9, &c. Q. How are ice to ivorship one God in three persons? A. We are to worship God in Christ the Son, by the Spirit. We must ask of the Father, in the name of the Son, and by the assis- tance of the Holy Ghost, Johnxvi. 23. Eph. v. 20. Jude 20. 32 OF THE DECnEES OF GOD. Q. Could ever the doctrine of the Holy Trinity be knoicn hy the light of nature? A. No; and this should make us thankful for the light of reve- lation. Q. Can this mystery of one in three, and three in one, be com- jrrchcndcd by hitman reason? A. JNo; the shallow capacities of men cannot fathom the deep things of God. This great mystery is what we should believe, reverence and adore, seeing we iiave the most plain and positive assertions in God's word of a trinity of persons, in an unity of es- sence. Q. Is there any thing in religion contrary to reason ? A. No. Q. Are there not many things in it above the reach of human reason? A. Yes. Q. Is it just to reject what our nature cannot account for. A. No; for then we should deny every one of God's essential perfections, fore:ichof them dolh infinitely transcend our thoughts; nay, we should deny that we have immortal souls, and many otlier tilings in nature that our reason cannot search out, such as tho motion of the wind and tide, iS^c. Q. What shall we think of those who deny the Trinity, or rC' fuse the divinity of the Son or Holy Ghost? A. That they are blasphemers and damnable heretics, seeing they deny such great and fundamental truths of God so clearly revealed in his word. Quest. 7. What are the decrees nf God P Ans. The decrees of (t()<1 are, his eternal purpose, accoriling to the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath fore-ortlained whatsoever comes to pass. Q. What do ye understand by God^s decrees? A. Ilis eternil purposes and appointments concerning the things that shall be in time and through eternity. Q. Were (dl God'' s decrees framed from eternity? A. Yes. Q. Doth God 'purpose nothing, upon new emergenis in timCf hut what he had before decreed? . A. No; Acts XV. 18. Isa. xlvi. 10. Q. And doth nothing fall out in time but according to these eternal decrees? A. No; Eph. i. !1. Q. Woidd it not be blasphemy to say that God is the author of sin? A Yes. OF THE DECREES OF GOD. S3 Q. Would it not make God the author of sin, to say that he had decreed sinful actions ? A. It would indeed be blasphemy to say that he had decreed to effectuate sin: but it is not so to say that he hath decreed to per^ mit sinful actions, and to over-rule them to his own glorious pur^ poses. Q. How doth it appear thai God may have such a holy hand a*- bout the sinful actions of men ? A. From several instances in scripture; particularly that in Acts ii. 3, where Peter chargeth home upon the Jews their cruci- fying of Christ with wicked hands, and yet at the same time says, That he was delivered up for that end by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God. See also Acts iv. 27, 28, where we may see that God's designing the crucifixion of Christ from eter- nity, and bringing the greatest good out of it to mankind, was no matter of excuse for the wicked part the Jews acted in it; seeing it flowed from a wicked principle in them, and was their own voluntary act and deed. Q. What counsel had God in fore-ordaining all things ? A. The counsel of his own will, which was according to infin* ite wisdom, and the highest reason, Eph. i. 1 1. Isa. xl. 13. Q. For tvhat end did God decree all things? A. For his own glory, Rom.xi. 36. Q. What perfections of his did he design thereby to glorify f A. His wisdom, pov/er, holiness, justice, goodness and truth. Q. Can nothing fall out in time to alter God''s decrees ? A. No. Q. How does it appear that his decrees are unchangeable f A. Because changing would import weakness, and that he did not foresee the letts and stops in the way of his purposes. Q. Do the many changes that fall out in time, such as God^s making the world, and afterwards destroying it, import any aU teration in God''s counsels or decrees 2 A. No; for God from eternity, by his immutable decree, did fore-ordain all these alterations. Q. Doth the immutability of God''s decrees take away the free will of rational creatures in performing their actions? A. No; but rather doth establish it, because God hath decreed to bring about his purposes in a way agreeably to the nature and liberty of free agents, without any constraint upon their wills, it being easy for infinite knowledge to foresee how they will incline end determine in every different situation. Q. Are there not many casual things that fall out in the tcorld, which maybe ascribed to chance? A. No; for though there be many things casual or contingent in respect of second causes or instruments, as falling out without 34 OF THE EXECUTION OF GOD'S DECREES. or beyond iheir design; yet there is nothing that falls out by chance, or is casual in respect to God, that foresees and deter- mines every thing that comes to pass. Q. Hath not God predestinated some to eternal life? A, This is plainly asserted in scripture, Eph. i. 4, 5, 6. 2 Thess. n. 13. Q. Was their foreseen faith, repentance or good works, the cause of this decree? A. No; but only the effect of it: for God decreed all these as necessary means to eternal life, as is clear from the fore-cited texts, Eph. i. 4, 5, 6. 2 Thess. ii. 13. and from Acts xiii. 48. " We are chosen that we should be holy," not because we are holy . Q. What then was the cause of God''s decree of election ? A. Nothing but his good pleasure and free love, Rom, ix. 1 1, 13, 18. No man hath any ground of boasting; for God hath past by one, and pitched upon another, according to his sovereign will and pleasure. Quest. 8. Hoic doth God execute Jiis decrees? •ins, God executeth his decrees in the wotks of creation and providence. Q. What do you understand by God's executing his decrees f A. His bringing to pass the things which he had before or- dained. Q. Are God''s decrees brought to pass in his works in time? A. Yes. Q. What are these works of Godi A. His works of creation and providence. Q. Are these all the works of God, which he hath decreed to bring to pass? A. Yes. Q. Is not the toork of redemption a part of God''s works, which he had decreedfrom eternity? ^. Y.es;but this is here included in God's works of providence; and indeed his work of redeeming lost sinners is the most glori- ous part of his providence towards men. Q. What is ihe difference between God''s executing or bringing to pass his work of creation, and his works of providence? A. The former he executed in six days, but the latter he con- tmues still to execute; the one without means, but the other usually by means. Q. Arc there not many ofGod^s decrees still to he executed? A. Yes; but they shall all be executed indue time, in the order God hath appointed, Isa. xlvi. 10. Rev. i. 1. and xxii. 6. Rom. xi. 25, 26. OF THE WORK OF CREATION. 35 Quest. 9. Jf^hat is the work of creation? Jins, The work of creation is, God's making all things of nothing, by the word of his power, in the space of six days, and all very good. Q. What is it to create ? A. It is to make something out of nothing, -and likewise the ma- king of a thing out of matter wholly unfit for it, as man'^s body out of the dust of the ground, is termed creating. Q. Who is the creator of all things ? A. God. Q. Out of what did God make all things? A. Of Nothing. Q. How can that he said, seeing man was made of the dust of the earth? A. Because God made that dust out of nothing. Q. Can none else create or make a thing out of nothing hut God?- A. No; neither man nor angel can create the least atom. Q. Cannot an angel make a living creature? A. No; not so much as a fly . Q, Can an angel turn any thing into nothing t A, No. Q. Can God do this? A . Yes, he could annihilate the whole world as easily as he cre- ated it. Q. Did God employ angels as his instrum£nts in the work of creation? A. No. Q. By what means then did God make all things ? A. By the word of his power; ^' He spake and it was done,*'^ Psalm xxiii. 9. Q. What was that word of power he made use of? A. That in Gen. i. Let ir ee ; as, " Let there be light,'' " Let there be a firmament,"' and the like. Q. In what time did God make all things? A, In six days. Q. Could not God have made them in less time? A. Yes. Q. Why then did he take so long a time to do it ? A. To give us a more distinct view of the order of the creation, and to set us an example of working six days, and resting the sev- enth. Q. In what state did God make all things at first? A. God made all things at first very good^ Gen. i. 3L Q. What is the meaning of these words, all very good ? A. That of all the things that were made, there was none of them marred in the making; all of them answered the Creator's design, and were fit to show forth his glory. 36 OF THE WOKK OF CREATION. Q. If all God'^s works are very good, then whose work is sin, that is so very evil? A. Sin is none of God's works; it is only the work of the dev- il, and of man that was tempted by him. Q. And whose workmanship are the devils^ or who made them? A. God made them angels of light, but they made themselves devils by sin. Q. When were the angels created? A. Certainly within the space of the six days mentioned by Moses; for in that time we are told that God finished the creating of the heavens with their hosts, Gen. ii. 1, 2, which must include the angels, who are expressly culled the heavenly hosts, Luke ii. 13. And many think they were created on the first day with the empyreal heavens, Genesis i. 1. Job xxxviii. 6, 7. Q. Why was Moses not more express and particular with res' pcct to the creation of angels? A. Because it being his great design to give a history of the church, and its original from tlie creation of the world, he judged it sufficient for his purpose to give us no more but a short account of the visible creation, to which angels do not belong. Q. For what end did God make the world? A. The Lord hath made all things for himself, and for the manifesting of his glorious perfections, ProV' xvi. 4. Q. What are the attributes of God which do most gloriously shine forth in the work of creation? A' His infinite power, wisdom and goodness. Q. How is the glory of God'^s poioer displayed in making the world? A. In his bringing all things of a sudden out of the womb of nothing by his bare word, Rom 'i. 20. Q. How doth the glory of God's wisdom shine forth herein? A' Jn the amazing variety of creatures, and the beautiful order and harmony of all things — the view whereof made the Psalmist cry out, Psalm civ. 24: " O Lord, how manifold are thy works-! in wisdom hast thou made them all.'" Q. - Hoiv is the glory of God'^s goodness manifested in creation ? A' In providing such a commodious habitation for man before he gave him a being, and making all creatures subservient to him, Psalm viii. 3-, 4, &,c. and xxxiii. 6. Q. On which day of the creation did God make light to shine? A. Upon the first day. Q. Were the sun, moon, and stars, made the first day? A. No; they were not made till the fourth day of the creation. Q. Hoiv could there he light made before the sun? A. It was easy for the great Creator to form a bright luminous body, and carry it about to enlighten the world for the first three OF THE CREATION OF MAN. 37 days, and afterwards place that light in the sun, moon and stars, when they were created. Q. \^'hen were the fishes created? A. On the fifth day. Q. When was man created? A. On the sixth day. Q. What did God do the seventh day ? A. He rested from all his works, and sanctified it for his Sabbath. Q. Was God weary with his work, that he rested after it? A. No; the Creator of the ends of the earth fainteth not, neitlier is he weary, Isa. xl. 28. Q. T4'haf is to be understood then by God^s resting? A. His ceasing from work. Q. What doth God teach us by this example? A\ To cease from the labor of the week, and keep a seventh part of our time holy to the Lord. Q. Is it not evident from sense and reason, as well as scrip- ture, that the world did not exist from eternity, but was created some few thousand years ago, according to Moses'' s account? A. Yes; it is clearly evident from the lateness of the invention of arts, the foundation of cities, the erecting of states, and the writing of histories, none of which do we find so ancient as the time of the creation fixed by Moses. Besides, the being of mountains and valleys, is a plain demonstration that the earth was not from eternity; for, seeing the rain still washeth down some earth from the heights, if the smallest quantity should but come down once in a thousand years, it is certain the mountains would have been entirely levelled in an infinite course of years, so that no height had now appeared. Q. Would it not be profitable for us to meditate muck upon the beautiful and stupendous creation ? A. Yes- it would make us little in our own eyes^ raise in us an awful sense and veneration of God's power and majesty, cause us to bale sin that brings disorder into this beau tifiil frame, and help us to trust to our Maker's power and goodness ia all our straits and difficulties. Quest. 10. How did God create man? Jins, God created man, male and female, after his own image ,in knawledge, righteousness and holiness, with dominion over the creatures. Q. which is the principal creature upon this earth ? A, Man. Q. Why then was he made after alt other creatures ? A. Because God thought fit to make the world as pn house ready furnished for him, before be would create man tc inhabit it. D 38 OF THE CREATIOiN OF MAN. Q. What sort of a creature is man 7 A. A compound being of soul and body, created male and female. Q. What is male and female? A. Man and woman. Q. How many men did God create at first? ji. Only one man and one woman. Q. What are the two constituent parts of man? A. Soul and body. Q. What is the soul of man? A. It is a spirit, rational, invisible and immortal, by which a man exerts all vital and intelligent acts, lives, moves, understands an wills. Q. How was man'^s soul made? A. God breathed into him, and he became a living soul. Q. Of what teas man''s hody made ? A. Adam's body was made of the dust of the ground, and Eve's was made of a rib from Adam's side. Q. Can the hody live without the soul? A. No. Q. Can the soullive without the hodifl A. Yes. Q. After whose image did God create mani A. After his own image. Q, Did this lie in man''s hody or in any bodily shape or like- ness ? A. No; but in man's soul, which is a spirit endowed with nat- ural faculties and mortal qualities, that bear some resemblance of its Maker. Q. ^^'he7'ein doth the soul resemble God in its natural faculties ? A. As it is an immortal spirit, endowed with understanding, will and memory. . ' Vv Q. Wherein did man at first resemble God in moral qualities! A. In his knowledge, righteousness, holiness, and dominion over the creatures, Q. What knowledge was man endowed with at his first crea- tion! A He had a vast knowledge of God, of his law and will, of his works and creatures; and these iq the lower world he knew well how to use and govern. And as an instance of his knowledge, he gave names to all the living creatures, suitable to their natures, at the first sight of them, Gen. ii . 19, 20. Q. What was that righteousness which man had at his first creation? A. He had an upright and righteous will, which inclined him to do justice to all his fellow creatures. Q. IVherein did his holiness liel A. In tUe purity of his soul and its affections, whereby he wa« OF THE WORKS OF PROVIDENCE. 39 inclined to hate all sin, love what was pure and pleasant to God, and study a perfect conformity to his holy law, both in heart and life. Q. Did not this holiness of nature Jit man for communion with God, and enable him to keep his law perfectly? A. Yes. Q. Was not holiness the principal part of God'^s image in man? A. Yes; and still it is the excellency of man in any slate, whether in earth or heaven, seeing it is by this that he resembles God. Q. Doth not knowledge beautify man too? A. Yes; very much, if attended with holiness; but knowledge without holiness is ratlier the resemblance of the devil than of God, Gen. iii. I. Acts xiii. 10. Q. TVfl.5 the dominion man at first had over the creatures any part of God'^s image in mant A. Yes; for by it he resembled God in his authority and gov- ernment. Q. What was that dominion which man had at first over the •creatures? A, Tt was that authority which was given him over the fish of the sea, the fowls of the air, and beasts of tlie earth; with power to rule, use and dispose thera at his pleasure; they all being sub- jected to his orders. Q. Hath not man now lost this dominion in a great measure ? A. Yes; for with respect to the most part of creatures, man now is either a terror to them, or they to him, which is one of the bit- ter fraits of the falU Since man hath rebeUed against God, no wonder the creatures prove rebellious and disobedient to him. Quest. 11. what are God^s ivories of providence? Ans. God's works of providence, are, his most ho- ly, wise, and powerful preserving, and goveriiing all his creatures, and all their actions. Q. How doth it appear that there is a providence that governs the ivorld? A. From plain scripture assertions, and from the exact accom- plishment of scripture prophecies; as also from natural things ob- vious to all, such as the exactness of the sun''s motions, diurnal and annual, that produce the most uniform revolutions of day and night, and the different seasons of the year, in order to provide ua of the necessaries and comforts of life; and likewise the regular ebbing and flowing of the sea; the remarkable care for preserving 40 OF THE WORKS OF PROVIDENCE. and propagating all the different species of living creatures, wheth- er rational, sensitive, or vegetable. Besides many other surprising observations and occurrences; all which convince us of the being of a wise Providence, that rules the world. Q. What are the objects of God? s providence, or the things a- bout u:hich it is concerned? A. It reacheth all the creatures, and all their actions, Psal. ciii. 19. John XV. 5. Acts xvii . 28 . Q. Is God^s providence concerned about the meanest as well o* the highest creatures? A. Yes; there is nothing so high that it is without its reach, and nothing so mean that it is below its notice: for, as he rules in the armies of heaven, so he tnkes care of the very ravens, spar- rows, lilies, grass, and hairs of our head, Dan. iv. 35. Matt. x. 29, 30. Matt. vi.30. Lukexii. 24. Q. If God take care of such mean creatures, will he not much more take care of the household of faith? A. Yes. Q. What are the acts ofGod^s providence about his creatures, and their actions ? A. They are chiefly two, to wit, his preserving and governing of them. Q. How doth he preserve his creatures ? A. By upholding them in being, defending them from evil, and providing them means of subsistence, Heb. i. 3. Psalm cxix. 19. and cxlv. 15, 16. Q. Would not the creatures continue in their beings without God'' s upholding of them? A. No; they would sink into nothing again without it; and, in this respect, providence is a continued creation. Acts xvii. 28. Q. Could not such creatures as the angels live and subsist without God'' s providence? A. No; no more than a fly, of any such creature. Q. How doth God govern all his creatures and their actions? A. By directing them to their proper ends according to their natures, producing events by them according to his pleasure, and over-ruling all their actions to his own glory, Psalm cxlvii. 15, 16. Prov. xvi. 9, 33. Q. Doth not Gad sometimes make his creatures act contrary to their natural course and force? A. Yes; when he pleaseth to act miraculously, as in dividing of the waters, causing iron to swim, restraining the force of fire, the fury of lions, &c. Q. Doth the providence of God extend to all the actions of men? A. Y'es; to them all, whether they be good or bad, natural, moral or casual, Acts xvii. 28. John xv. 5. Exod. xxi. 12, 13. OF THE WORKS OF PROVIDENCE. 41 <2. What hand hath divhic providence about sinful actions? A. He hath an holy hand, in permitting them, limiting and re- straining tliem, and directing them to holy and wise ends beyond the intentions of the actors, Acts xiv. 16. Psalm Ixxvi- 10. Isa. x. 5, 6, 7. Q. How doth God permit men to fall into sin? jil. Hein hisjust judgment leaves them, or gives them up to their own heart's lusts, and the instigations of Satan, Psal. Ixxxi. 11. 12. Q. Why doth God permit, sin, ivkcn he can hinder it? A. In this he acts as a holy and just judge; when men refuse kis calls, and despise light and love, he justly punisheth them by leaving them to themselves. And yet he is pleased to temper jus- tice with mercy and wisdom; for hereby heahews men what evil is in their hearts for their conviction and humiliation, and how wonderfully he can turn about the worst things to his own glory, and the good of his church, 2 Chron. xxxii, 31. Neh. ix. 28. Q. Can you illustrate this by any instances from scripture? A, Yes; it is evident, not only in the betraying and crucifying of Christ mentioned before upon the seventh question, but also in th-e selling of Joseph into Egypt: the actors meant it for evil, but God turned it about for great good, Gen. 1 . 20. Q. Who are these about whom the providence of God is most especially concerned? A. The church, and all who are true believers; while others have only God's common and general providence to depend upon; see- ing he hath promised to make all things work together for their good, Rom. viii. 28. Q, What are the properties of God? s providential acts? A. There are three mentioned in the answer; 1. They are most holy without spot or blemish. 2. Most wise, without mistake or error. 3. Most powerful, they cannot be stopped or resisted, Psalm cxlv. 17. Rom. xi. 33. Dan. iv. 35, Q, If God doth govern the ivorld so wisely, why doth he lei his people be ajflicted, and his enemies prosper in the world? A. God's wisdom is hereby glorified: for these dispensations, however crooked they seem to us, are wisely ordered to carry on the salvation of his people, and destruction of his enemies. Q. Are there not many who practically deny God''s providence ? A. Yes; such as those who do not consult with God in their undertakings, nor seek his blessing thereupon; and those who as- cribe their success more to second causes than unto God; and those who are impatient under afflictions, distrust God in their straits, or betake themselves to unlawful shifts to obtain what they want. Q. What regard ought we to shew to the providence of God? A. We ought by prayer to interest providence in all oux af- D 2 42 OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS. fairs, and depend upon its care: we ought seriously lo observe its step-;, and humbly submit lo its deterininaiions. Q. Ought we not to 'put a remark on all the gracious .steps of God's providence towards us? A. Yes. Q. What are these ire ought especlaUij to rcmarl? .A A. Siicli as the care of providence in preserving us in the " womb, and from the v;amb — watching over us in our helpless in- fancy — ordering our lot to fall in a land of gospel light, and not among infidels — allowing us religious education, and good exam- ples—giving us wakening ordinances and dispensations for our conversion to God — preserving our lives so long amidst so many dangerous diseases and accidents-— and keeping us from many snares and temptations lo sin. Quest. 13. What sjyecial act of providence did God exercise toward man in ike estate wherein he was created F Jlns, When God had created man, he entered into a covenant of life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience; forbidding him to eat of the tree of knowl- edge of good and evil, upon pain of death. Q. "What did God with man after he had created him? A. He entered into a covenant witb him. Q. What do you mean by a covenant^. A. A mutual paction or agreement betwixt two parties. Q. How many covenants hath God entered into with man? A. Two, to wit, the covenant of works, and the covenant of grace. Q. Which of these two covenants did God make icith Adam at first? A. It was the covenant of works, which in the answer is called a covenant of life. Q, Why is it called both a covenant of works, and a covenant of life? A. It is called a covenant of works, from the condition of it j and a covenant of life, from the promise or reward of it. Q. How doth it appear that God and Adam did really enter into a covenant? A. From this that God required Adam to obey his will, prom- ising him life if he should do it, and threatening death to him if he did not. And doubtless Adam, who was made after the im- age of God, consented to this his Creator"'s will, when first inii- mated to him. Q. Had this covenant a condition in it? OP THE COVENANT OF WORKS. 43 A. Yes.; to wit, works, or obedience to the will of God. Q. What do you mean by the condition of a covenant? A. A special arlicle or term, upon the fulfilling of which, the promised blessings of the covenant only are to be bestowed. Q. What soft of ohcdienoedidthis covenant require as the con- dition of it? A. Perfect obedience to the whole will of God. Q. When may obedience be reckoned perfect? A. It is so when a man continues in doing all things comman- i!ed by God, without any defect in matter or manner, principal or ends. Q. Was there no grace in the covenant of works? A. Yes; there was much grace in God's condescending to en- ter into a covenant with his own creature, and promising him great rewards to encourage him to t)bedience, when he was ab- solutely obliged to it by bis creation, though nothing had been promised at alL Q. What was the reward ]promised in this covenant for man'^s 'Obedience? A^ Life. Q . What sort of life iras it ? A. A threefold life — natural, spiritual and eternal. The nat- iiral and spiritual life, given to man at his creation, was to be con- tinued with him; and in due time lie was to be translated toeterr nal life in heaven, without dying. Q. Tfhat account can you give of the nature of that threefold life? A. The natural life consists in the union of soul and body; the spiritual life in the union of the soul with God; the eternal life in tbe happiness of the whole man in the immediate vision and frui- tion of God in heaven for ever. Q. Was the covenant made with Adam for himself alone? A. No; it was made with him, not only for himself, but in the name of all his posterity. Q, Had Adam sufficiency of strength and grace given him at first to perform thee ondition of this covenant? A. Yes, Q. Did not this covenant require obedience to the whole moral law? < A. Y^'es, Q. Where was that law written ? A. In the hearts of our first parents. Q. Was there- not something else that God required of them as a present trial of their obedience? A. Yes; namely. That they should not eat the tree of know- ledge of good and evil. Q. Why did God deny them thai one tree? A. To try their subjection and obedience to their sovereign Lord, of whom they held all comforts; and to teach them that their 44 OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS. chief happiness did not lie in the enjoyment of temporal things, but of Grod's favour; and that they oufiht to prefer his will and plea- sure to all the detifjhls of sense. Q. Had that tree any virtue in it to make men knowing and wise ? A. No; it had none, though Satan deluded them with this temptation. Q. ^\hy then roas it called the tree of knowledge of good and evil? A. It was so called to assure them, that, if they did eat of it, they should know to their sad experience, both what good they would forfeit, and what evil they would bring upon themselves and their posterity. Q. What good were they to forfeit and lose? A. Both the image and favour of God, Q. What evil icerc they to feel? A. The wrath and curse of God. Q. Was this penally jylainly intimated to them, when the cove- nant was made ivith them? A. Yes; for God said, "In the day thou eatest thereof, thou sbalt surely die?" Q. What sort of a death did God threaten them with ? A. A threefold death, answerable to the life promised: to wit, death temporal, spiritual and eternal. Q. What account can you give of the nature of that threefold death ? A. Temporal or natural death consists in the separation of the sodl from the body; spiritual death in the separation of the soul fron) God. and the loss of his image; eternal death lies in the sep- aration of both soul and body from the comfortable presence of God for ever. Q. Did Adam die naturally that very day he ate this fruit? A. No: for he lived till he was 930 years old. Q. How then was the threatening of God accomplished? A. On the day he did eat, he died spiritually, and became liablo to temporal and eternal death. Q. What do you understand hy these words, he died spiritual- ly, &c.? A. 1 understand, that Adam lost the image and favour of God ; that he became mortal, and liable, to all afflictions in this life, and to the torments of hell hereafter. Q. Why was not the sentence fully executed upon him present- lyt A. We have ground to believe he was saved from eternal death by the mediation of Christ; and for the elect's sake, who were to spring from him, he got a reprieve as to natural death for a time; yet sin gave his body the death's wound, of which he died at length. OF ADAM'S FALL. 45 Q. May we not read much of sin'' s evil in that awful threaten- A. Yes; for sin is an evil that deprives man of the happiness of a threefold life, and exposes him to the misery of a threefold death. Q. Was there any place in that covenant for a mediator or surety ? A. No; for it required personal obedience or suffering from every man, for himself Q. Would it not accept of repentance from sinners, and sincere endeavors after obedience, though imperfect? A. No; for it required obedience absolutely perfect, and sen- tenced the transgressor to wrath for the least failure, without any hope of mercy to the penitent. Q. Ought not all believers to bless God that they are not under this covenant? A, Yes. Q. Is not the case of unbelievers sad, who still remain under it? A. Yes. Quest. 13. Did our first parents continue in the estate wherein they were created P Ans, Our first parents, being left to the freedom of their own will, fell from the estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God. Q. What was the estate wherein our first parents were created ? A. It was a state of innocence and of great happiness. Q. Wherein did their happiness lie? A. They were free of all sin and misery: they had all earthly felicity in paradise,, and enjoyed sweet communion with God. Q. How did they fall from this happy state? A. By sinning against God. Q. Were they not made upright, after the image of God? and how then could they sin? A. Though they were made upright, yet they were not confirmed in that estate like the elect angels; but created mutable, being left to the freedom of their own will. Q. Were they created with any will or inclination to sin? A. No. Q. What do you mean by the freedom of tcill that they were left to? A. That they were not under constraint from any, but had a lib- erty in their will to chuse or refuse either good or evil. Q. Had they not a sufficieiit liberty in their will, and power to have obeyed God in all things, and to have resisted all temptations to sin? 46 OF ADAM'S FALL. j4. Yes; if they had used it well, as they might have done: but liaving their stock in their own hand, without any confirming grace from God, they might also fall, if they would. Q. Hath fallen man the same freedom of will to what isgoodf that Adam had atfrst ? A. No; though somerelicks of that freedom to things naturally or morally good be found in unregenerate men, in some more, in some less: yet they have no freedom of will to things spiritually good, being "dead in sins and trespasses," Eph.ii. h Q. Do regenerate persons attain to Adam^s freedom of will to good ? A. Not altogether in this life, though they recover it in a good measure: but being only renewed in part, and the image of God im- perfect in them while here, their wills are not entirely free to w^hat is good, there being still a sad mixture in them of inclination to what is evil. Q. V^' hat freedom of will have the saints in glory? A. They have a freedom of will only to what is good, and a perfect freedom too: and by virtue of confirming grace, they can- not will any thing that is evil . Q. ^^liat do you mean hy God''s leaving our first parents to the freedom of their will? A. His sutfering them to make their choice when both good and evil were in their offer, and not giving them any new supplies of grace to prevent their will from yielding to temptations to sin. Q. Why did he not give these new supplies? A. Because he was not bound to do it, and he had glorious de- signs to bring about by not doing it. Q. What temptation had our frst parents to sin against God? A. First, The devil tempted the wbman to eat of the forbidden tree; and, next, he put her on to tempt Adam to do the same. Q. Could Satan have used any violence to cause them to sinf A. No; all he could do, was to tempt them to it in a subtile manner. Q . IVhal method did he take in doing it? A. He made use of the serpent, and spake out of it; he shewed them the desirableness of the fruit, and persuaded them that by eat- ing it they should become wise as God, and should escape the punishment threatened; he attacked Eve when she was alone, and then made use of her to prevail with her husband. Q. Is it not upon this account that Christ calls the devil a liar and a murderer from the beginning ? A. Yes; for it was by lies and falsehoods that he murdered our first parents and their posterity. Q. Was it not a dreadful sin in ihem,io believe the devil more than God? OF SIN. 47 A. Yes; and it is what Adam's children are much inclined to do still, according to their example. Q. Vyjiat would become of the best men now, if God should leave them to themselves , and to Sataji's temptations? A. They would surely be ruined, considering that we have lost our strength by the fall. No man here attains lo Adam's perfec- tion in grace; there is still a mixture of corruption in the best. Q. Should we not always pray against God'^s leaving us to our free will? A. Yes; for if perfect holiness, without new aids and confirm- ing grace from God, be no security against total apostacy, as is evident from the example of the angels and our first parents; our ruin must be inevitable, if God should leave us, who are weak and corrupt, to ourselves . Q. Are not believers now safe from any such fall? A, Yes: though that is not owing to themselves, but to the gra- cious promise of God through Jesus Christ. Q. What were God'^s wise and gracious ends in permitting Adam's fall? A. He designed to glorify his infinite wisdom, and likewise his justice and mercy, in saving lost sinners of mankind by a sure- ty of his own providing. Quest. 14. what is sin ? Jins, Sin is any want of conformity unto, or trans- gression of the law of God. Q, What mean you by the law of God? A. The commands or precepts which God hath given to man to be his rule to walk by. Q. Where is this law written? A, At first it was clearly written on Adam's heart, but by the fall this vi^riting became dark, and therefore God has written it most plainly to us in his word. Q. How many kinds of laws hath God written there? A. Three — the judicial, the ceremonial, and the moral law. Q. What is the judicial law? A. That which related to the civil constitution, and contained the municipal statutes of the Jewish nation; which do not bind other nations any further than they are founded upon moral equity. Q. What is the ceremonial lata? A. The statutes relating to the Jewish worship, their sacrifices, washings and rites, which were typical of Christ and his benefits^ and are now fulfilled and abrogated by Christ's coming. Q. Tfhat is the morallawl 48 OF THE SLN OF OUR FIRST PARENTS. A. That which is the rule of our manners and practice, and is perpetually binding upon all men, which we have briefly summed up to us by God himself in the ten commandments. Q. Ought all men to study a conformity to this law? A. Yes: for every want of it is a sin. Q. IVhat do you understand by conformity to this laic? A, A suitableness in us to what it requires. Q. JVhat sort of conformity is due by us to God'*s law ? A. Both an internal conformity of the heart and thoughts, and an external conformity of the words and actions; and if the first be wanting, we are guilty of sin, be the latter never so exact. Q. Uliat is meant by the transgression of the laic ? A. It is a going beyond the bounds and limits which God doth set to us by his law, or doing that which is contrary to it. Q. Why are both these expressions made use of to describe sin, namely, Want of Conformity to the law, and Transgression of the law? A. 'J'he first of these is made use of to include original sin, which is a want of conformity of nature; and sins of omission which area want of conformity of life to God's law. The second is used to comprehend all ains of commission, either ia thought, word, or deed . Q. Must not sin be a great evil which breaks such a holy, just vnd good law ? A. Yes . Q. wherein doth the prodigious greatness of this evil appear? A. In these: that sin shakes off the sovereignty of God, despi- seth his power, offends his holiness, grieves his Spirit, defaceth his image in the soul, and brings damnation to it. Q. What is the glass that represents the evil of sin in the most lively colors ? A. We see much of sin's evil in the glass of God's holy law, and very much of it in the glass of hell's torments; but most of all in the glass of Christ's sufferings and death. Q. Can we ever repair the injury that sin doth to God'^s holy law? A. No: but Christ our surety hath given full satisfaction for all the sins of those who believe in him. Quest. 15. What was the sin ivherehy our first pa- rents fell from the estate wherein they were created ^ Ans, The sin whereby our iirst parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden fruit. Q. Ifhy did God forbid the eating of this fruit f OF THE SIN OF OUR FIRST PARENTS. 40 4 To shew his dominion over man, and to make trial of man's obedience to his Maker's will and authority in keeping a command for which he saw no reason but purely the will of God. O Was there no evil in eating this fruit, if God had not for- bid it? ^- ^^' Q. 'Were our first parents guilty of no sin before actual eat- ing of this fruit? JKT • ^ J.. Yes; they sinned in hearkening to the devil, and believing him, before they did eat. , . /? ^ • ^ Q WA7/ is their eating the fruit called then their first sin? A. Because it was their first sin finished, as expressed m James i. 14, 15. ^ Q. Who was first in the transgression? A. The woman. ^,.77 r '^ * Q. Was our first parents^ eating of the forbidden fruit a great sin A. In several respects, it was the most hemous sm ever was committed. Q. Horn doth that appear? . 1 j- A In reaard it was a complicated wickedness, including many atrocious sms in it, such as renouncing the authority ot their Creator, unthankfulness for his great bounty, aspirmg to be equal with God, believing the devil before God, and joining in rebellioa with him, murdering themselves and all their offspring: and all this guilt was attended with the most terrible aggravations that ever v;ere heard of. Q. \\ hat were these aggravations? A They committed this sin soon after they were made after the image of God, when they had no corruption withm to incline th-m to It, nor temptation from without, but what they could ea- sily resist: yea, they were guilty of it in paradise in the presence of God, and in the place where they had been lately taken into covenant with God; they well knew the glorious advantages of keeping this covenant, and the fearful consequences of breaking it; nay^they sinned against the clearest light and illumination ot God's Spirit, that ever any mere man had; so that we should not think of this sin without horror. Q. Did it not heighten their sin, that they durst of end so great a Gad for so small a temptation as a little fruit? A. Yes, very much. . -> i * » Q By what door got sin access to our first parents hearts f A. By the door of the eyes, Gen. iii. 6. The fruit was pleasant to the eye. 7 ^t • 7 Q, Should we not learn from this to set a watch upon this door, that sin may not enter by it ? ^- Yes. 50 OF OUR FALL IN ADAM. Q. Have we not the examples of saints set before us^ who did so? A. Yes: we have the example of Job, who made a covenant with his eyes; and of David, who prayed to turn away his eyes from beholding vanity, Job xxxi. 1. Psal. cxix. 37. Quest. 16. Did all manic ind fall in Jdain's first transgression P Jins, The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity, all mankind descended from liim by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him in his first transgression. Q. Was the covenant of worJcs made with Adam for himself only ? A. No; it was made with him for his posterity also, Q. What mean you by Adam''s posterity ? A. His children or offspring that should come after him, to the end of the world. Q. Are we included in that covenant, who live now near si^ 'thousayid years since it was made? A. Yes, seeing we are of Adam's posterity. Q. How could the covenant be made xdth us who had not then a being ? A. We had a being virtually in Adam's loins; and Adam trans- acted with God , not as a single person, but as a common head and representative of all his posterity; and so the covenant was made with Adam in our name. Q. Is it upon thai account ive are said to sin in him, and fall with him ? A. Yes, according to Rom. V.' 12. 1 Cor. xv. 22. Q, How came Adam to be our head, and repj'esentative in this covenant? A. God appointed him. Q. Hoiii can Adam be held as our representative, seeing we never consented to it ? A. Could we have existed, we would have consented to so just a choice, Adam being our natural head and affectionate parent, made after, God's image, with sufficient power to obey hirn. And seeing it was God's will, we are bound to consent to it as a holy and just law. Besides, it is warrantable in human transactions and covenants, for parents to represent children unborn; as in ma- king bargains, selling lands, contracting debts, &c. And why then was it not just for Adam to represent us in transacting >YitU God. OF OUR FALL IN ADAM. 51 Q. Is it just thai parents sliould make covenants for their children, whereby they may he involved in guilt and misery^ and made to suffer for what they never committed^ A. If a man makes a covenant for himself and his posterity, in a thing just and lawful, men do judge his children bound: as in case of our allegiance to a king, the rebellion of a father may just- ly affect his posterity, stain their whole blood, and forfeit their iaheritance. And if this be reckoned just among men, why is it not also just betwixt God and man? Q. Was it right to put our stock into the hands of those who improved it so Hit A. They might have improven it well if they had pleased, and none of their children could have been thought better hands than they were. Neither is the^-e place for us to complain, who ap- prove of their ill management and apostacy from God, by our sin- ning daily after the similitude of Adam's transgression. Q. If Adam had stood, would not we have been happy with him? A. Yes; and therefore, seeing he fell, it is just we should b« miserable with him. Q. Are we partakers with Adain in aU his sins? A. No; but in his first sin only. Q. Why only in his first sin? A. Because then he represented all his posterity as a federal head; but, after he once broke the covenant, he was no more trusted as such, but reckoned to act as a single person only for himself. Q. Is it not as just to impute Adam^s first sin to Jus posterity for their condemnation, as it is to impute Christ'' s righteousness to us for our justification ? A. Yes, it is equally just, because of the covenants being made both with the first and second Adam in our name, Eorn. v. 18, 19. \ Q. How soon is Adam'^s sin imputed to his posterity? , A. As aoon as they have a being, and stand in relation to \ Adam. Q. If one sin hath thus defiled and destroyed all mankind, should we not look upon sin as of a most mischievous nature? A. Yes. and avoid it more carefully than we would do the plague.. Q. Should not our wofulfall by the first Adam, stir us up to seek recovery by Christ the second Adam ? A. Yes; we should be restless till we get it, that as we have borne the image of the earthly Adam, we may come to bear the image of the heavenly, and be taken to dwell with him at last. Q. Did ever any ofAdum'^s posterity escape the imputation of his first sin? 62 OF MAN'S ESTATE BY THE FALL. A. None, but Jesus Christ only. Q. Was Christ one of Adaiii's posterity? A. Yes. Q. How doth that appear? A. In regard he is the seed of the woman, and had the sub- stance ofhis flesh from Mary that descended from Adam. Q. Jf Christ descended from Adam, how could he escape Ad' am's sin ? A. He escaped it by descending from Adam not by ordinary generation, but in an extraordinary way. Q. What was that? A. lie was conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost in the womb of a virgin, without any earthly father. Q. Why was Christ conceived in this ironderful manner? ' A. That he might be kept free of the guilt and pollution of Ad- am's sin. Q. W as this sufficient to keep him free of it ? A. Yes; because the Holy Ghost, by his infinite power did sanctify and keep pure and spotless so much of the virgin's sub- stance as was needful to form our Saviour's body, Luke i. 35. Q. Are all the rest of mankind defiled with Adam^s sin ? A. Yes; and infants as well as others. Q. Are all men equally guilty and sinful before God ? A, Yes; they are so in respect of nature, but not in respect of practice. Q. How comes there to he any dijference in respect of practice f A, Because some are more left of God, and some are more be- holden to free grace, than others, 1 Cor. iv. 7. Quest. 17. Into what estate did the fall hrin^ man- IciiidP Ans. The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery. Q. Who ofAdani^s race were Ir ought into a state of sin hy his fall? A. All mankind, excepting Jesus Christ. Q. Did the fall bring mankind into a state of sin only? A. Into a state of misery also. Q. Can a man he inn state of sin, and not in a state of mise- ry? A. No; for the one still followelh upon the other; misery, is the necessary consequent of sin. Q, Was there ever such a fall as that of the first man ? A. No. Q, Hoxc so? OF THE SINFULNESS, &-c. ^5 A Because Adam and all his posterity were so bruised and disabled by that woful fall, that they could do nothing to raise themselves up, but must lie in their miserable case till divine mercy move for their relief. Q. Are we not defiled as well as disabled by thejall/ A. Yes; our fall is like that of a man into a pit among stones and mire, which both bruises and defiles him at once. Quest. 18. Wherein consists the sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell F Ans. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists in the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of his whole'uature, which is commonly called original sin ; together with all actual transgressions which pro- ceed from it. Q. What are the twe emls mentioned in the ansicer, which male up the smfulness of our fallen estate? A. They are original and actual sin. Q. What are these evils which make up original sin ? A They are three, to wit, the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of our whole Jsature. ., ^ ^ , , /- . • -j Q. What do you mean by the guilt of Adam's first sm ? A. Ourliableness to wrath or punishment by reason of the sm of Adam. Q. How doth that guilt become ours? A. By the imputing of Adam's sin to us: behaving been our representative in the covenant of works which he brake. Q. What is meant by the want of original righteousness which we now lie under by the fall? r * «• A. It imports, that we are now deprived of that pertect recti- tude, purity and holiness, implanted in man's nature at his farst creation, which was the image of God upon his soul. Q. How is it that we have lost that original righteousness ar the imacre of God in our souls? , • i. * A. God is now provoked to withhold it, as a just punishment of Adam's fall. -^n u Q. Doth itmahe God the author of sm, to say that he wUhholds ^risrinal righteousness from us? A No- for he is not bound to restore that to us which we have lost through our own fault, but may justly deny it as a punish- E2 54 OF THE SJNFULNESS OF mcnt of Adam's first sin. We are bound to have it, but God is not bound to give it. Q. Doth not the want of original righteousness make way for the corruj^tion of our whole nature? A. Yes. Q. What do you mean by the corrujytion of our whole nature ? A. That our whole constitution, both in soul and body, is infected, defiled and depraved by sin, and that from the very womb. Q. Wherein doth this corruption of our nature appear? A. In our impotency and enmity to what is good, and in our pronenessand inclination to what is evil. Q. What parts of our nature doth this corruption infect? A. Our whole nature and constitution, every sense and mem- ber of our bodies, and every power and faculty of our souls, to wit, our understandings, wills, consciences, memories, afiections and thoughts. Q. How are our senses and members corrupted by original sin? A. They are now become ready weapons and instruments of unrighteousness, Rom. vi. 13. Q. How is the mind or understanding corrupted thereby? A. It is so blinded and darkened, that it cannot discern spirit- ual things. Q. How is the will corrupted? A. It is turned crooked and perverse, backward to good, and inclined to evil. Q. How is the conscience corrupted? A. It is become sleepy, dead, partial, biassed and unfaithful; it doth not perform its office uprigh.tly, by warning, challenging and speaking for God, as his deputy ought to doj but is either si- lent or faint in God's cause. Q. Hoiv is the memory corrupted? A. It is become weak, deceitful and false: it is apt to forget what is good and necessary for us, and to retain what is evil, vain and unprofitable to us. Qr How are the affections corruptedl A. They have gone into sad disorder, and are naturally set upon improper and wrong objects; we love what we should hate, and hate what we should love; we rejoice in things which are matter of sorrow, and we sorrow for things that are ground of joy. Q. How are the thoughts of the heart corrupted? A. God is not in our thoughts, but they are apt to run out up- on the vanities of the world, or sinful objects. Q. How is this corruption of the nature conveyed from Adam to hii posterity ? Is it from the Author of our beings "i i MAN'S NATURAL ESTATE. 65 A. It is not from God, who is the author of all holiness and purity, but of no sin or corrupiion: God justly withholds original righteousness from us, but doth not communicate sin or corrup- tion to any of his creatures: but it is conveyed to us by natural generation. Psalm li. 5. Job xiv. 4. and xv. 14. Q. How is original sin conveyed by natural generation? A. By sinful parents producing sinful children like them- selves; as we see the parent's leprosy infects the child, and trea- son stains the blood of posterity. Q. Though the body be corrupted by this way, how can the soul he thus infected, that is not begot by natural generation? A, By reason of the intmiate union and close conjunction of the soul with the body; the soul being destitute of original righteous- ness when joined with the corrupt body, is also tainted with corruption, as liquor is tainted by the vessel it is put into. — Though the manner of propagating original sin to the soul be diflicult to explain, yet the certainty of the thing itself is most evident. Q. How doth the certainty of this appear? A. From the word of God, and our woful experience. Q. How doth it appear from the word of God? A. From many passages in it, such as these which assert, that we are conceived and born in sin, that a clean thing cannot be brought out of an unclean, that what is born of the flesh is flesh, that we are dead in sms and trespasses, and transgressors from the very womb. And likewise it is asserted of Adam, who was made after the likeness of God, that, after his fall he begat a son in his own likeness, after his image: for all which, see the follow- ing plain texts. Psalm li. 5. Job xiv. 4. John iii. 6. Eph. ii. 1. Isa. xlviii. 8. Gen. v. 3. Q. How doth the truth of original corruption appear from ex- perience ? A. In regard every man may feel that there is in him a natu- ral antipathy to what is spiritually good, and a woful pronenesa to what is evil, besides many other bitter fruits of it. Q. What are these bitter fiuits of original corruption? A. Such as these; our blindness of mind, hardness of heart, ha- tred of God and goodness, placing of our aflections upon wrong objects, and falling into daily sins. Q. Doth not this original sin and corruption make us odious io God, and deserving of hell, before the commission of actual sin ? A, Yes. Q. How doth that appear? A. By these two things; First, the infinite purity of God's na- 56 OP THE SINFULNESS, &c. ture, that cannot but abhor sin and corruption, especially such corrupt natures as we have, which contain the seeds and princi- ples of all sorts of sins that ever were or shall be committed in the world. Secondly^ By the miseries, sufferings and death which we see inflicted upon infants, which never committed ac- tual sin, Rom. v. 14. Q. Is it not reasonable that children, procreate by sanctijied parents, should be free of original corruption? A. No; for the natures of the best saints are not perfectly sanctified, but remain still corrupt in part. And this corruption is natural to them, whereas grace is supernatural and adventi- tious. Q. Cannot gracious parents convey grace to their children ? A, No; because they have propagated much corruption to them. Q. Is there any remedy for this original sin or corruption? A. Yes; there is the blood and the Spirit of Christ; the one to pardon it, the other to change the nature by a work of regenera- lioa. Q. Doifi the worh ofregeneraiion remove it wholly in this life? A. Not wholly; for we find the best complaining while they are here, Rom. vii. 14, 18, 23, Jam. iii. 2. and iv. 5. Q. lihat names doth original sin get in scripture ? A. It is called the old rnan, the fcsh, lust, and indwelling siHf Rom. vi. 6. and viii. 5. James i. 15. Rom. vii. 17. Q. Why is it called Original Siuj seeing this word is not in scripture ? A. To denote three things; First, That we derive it from Ad- am, who is the original of all rnankind. Secondly, That it is in us from our original or first having a being. Thirdly, That it is the original of all actual sins or transgressions. Q. What is the difference between Original and Actual sin ? A. Original sin is the sin inherent to our nature, which we bring into the world with us; but actual sin is that which we com- mit after we come to the use of reason. Q. What do you mean by an actual sin or transgression ? A. Every breach of the law of God, whether by omitting duty commanded, or committing sin forbidden by it. Q. Are there not many different kinds of actual sins? A. Yes; very many, such as sins of omission, and of commis- sion; sins against the first tablej and sins against the second; sins of the heart, and of the life; of the words and of the actions; of ignorance, and against light; of infirmity, and of presumption, &:c. Q. Whence do all these actual sins proceed? A. From original sin, or the corruption of our natures. OF THE MISERY, &c. 67 Q. May it not he thoitghtthat ilicyp'oceed more from the evil example set before us ? A. No- for we see Cain's miirdering his brother proceeded out of his heart, and not from any such example; according to Matth. XV. 19. Q. How do the sins of the life proceed from the evil heart or nature? A, Even as evil fruit from a corrupt tree, or unclean streams from a polluted fountain, Matt. vii. 17. James iii. 11. Quest. 19. What is the misery of that estate whereinto man fell P Ans, All mankiud by their fall lost communion with God, are under his wrath and curse, and so made liable to all the miseries of this life, to death itself; and to the pains of hell for ever. Q. What are the three heads of man'' s misery hy the fall point- ed at in the ansu-er ? A. There is, First, The happiness we have lost by it. Second- ly, The evils we are presently under. Thirdly, The miseries we are further liable to. Q, What are these three w. ore particularly? A. The happiness we have lost is communion with God: the evils we are presently under, are God's wrath and curse, and all the afflictions of this life: the miseries we are further liable to, are both the first and second death. Q. Hath man lost no more happiness hut communion with God? A. He hath also lost the image of God upon his soul; but that was mentioned in the former answer, under the want of origmal righteousness, which is the same thing with the image of God. Q. Wfiac do you mean by that communion with God which man hath lost by his falU A. It is that sweet intimacy, acquaintance and fellowship with God, which man had in the enjoyment of God's gracious pres- ence and comforts in the garden of Eden, Q, How doth it appear that man enjoyed such sweet communi- on icith God there before his fall ? A. From this, that there was no sin nor guilt then to stop man's free access to God, or to eclipse the light of God's counte- nance towards man; and therefore he was under the continual smiles of his Creator. God conversed familiarly with him, con- ferred high favours upon him, transacted with him by covenantj 53 OF THE MISERY OF brought all the living creatures to own their subjection to him, and receive names from him, Gen. i. 28, 29, 30, and ii. 15, 16, 19,22. Q. How did our first parents lose all that sweet communion with God? A. By their sinning against God, and breaking his holy laws. Q. Is not the loss ofi communion with God a very great mis- ery ? A. Yes; for seeing the happiness of heaven lies in having com- munion with God, who is the soul's chief good and portion; the want of that communion must be our greatest loss and misery, and therefore it is justly put before all the rest of our miseriei mentioned in the answer. Q. ts not the eternal loss of communion with God the chief part ffthe misery of the damned in hell? A. Yes; for, depart from me, is the first word of the sentence against them. Q. Did not man first for salce God, before God withdrew his gracious jyresence from man ? A. Yes; it is evident that man fell from God, before he lost communion with hitn. Q. How doth it appear that our first parents were deprived of communion with God after their fall. A. By their hiding themselves, and fleeing from God in whose presence they formerly rejoiced; and by God's frowning upon them, driving them out of paradise, and placing a flaming sword to guard the entry to it, Gen. iii. 8, 17, 23, 24. Q. How doth it apear that all Adam'' s posterity have also lost communion with God by the fall? A. From this, that we have a natural aversion to God's pres- ence, and to the means of attaining to it, such as meditation, prayer, and attending upon the word and sacraments. Q. 3Iust not sin be a great evil, that deprives us of so great a happiness as communion with God? A. ILes. Q. Why cannot sinful creatures have communion with God? A. Because he is a holy God, and of purer eyes than to behold miquitv-,- he cannot look upon sin where it is harboured or allow- ed. * * Q. Have unregenerate sinners any desire after communion with God? A. No; for the presence of God is both hateful and frightful to them; and hence it is, they say linto God, Depart from us, Job xxi. 14. Q, Why do they hate God'^s presence, and commimion with him f A, Because, being unregenerate ajid sensual, ilieir carnal minds MAN'S NATURAL ESTATE. 59 is enmity against God ; and, being guilty criminals, they dread the presence of their Judge, who has. power to condemn them. Q. Is the loss of communion with God hy Adam's fall an ir- recoverable loss to us ? A. No; for God hath found out a way for recovering lost sin- ncre to a state of communion with himself again. Q. What is that way? A. By appointing Jesus Christ to be our Redeemer, for taking away our guilt, and purchasing communion with God for us, by his blood ; and so believers may have free access to his throne of grace here, and to his throne of glory hereafter. Q. Will not the believer''s communion with God in heaven^ he far more sweet than Adam'^s was in paradise? A. Yes: for the believer will have greater discoveries of the love of God, than Adam had; he will have God dwelling with him in his own nature, and be immutably fixed in a state of bliss for ever, Eph. ii. 5. 6. Q. Are we not infinitely hound to Christ for recovering to us what Adam lost? A, Yes. Q. }/\/here is communion with God to he enjoyed here? A. In the use of these ordinances which God hath appointed, to wit, the word, sacraments, prayer, and praises. Q. When is it that we have communion with God in his ordi- nances ? A. When he allows us the gracious influences of his Spirit up- on our souls: that is, when we have the communications of light, life, strength, or comfort from God, and when our graces of faith, love, repentance, or spiritual desires, are drawn forth to a lively exercise. Q. Besides loss of communion with God, are we not likewise brought under his icrath and curse by the fall? A. Yes; we are all by nature children of wrath, and under God''s curse; according to these plain texts, Eph, ii. 3. Gal. iii. Q. What is meant by the wrath of God? A. God's anger, or sin-revenging justice, which burns fiercely against sin, and is ready to break forth in terrible judgments against sinners. Q. What is meant by the curse of God ? A. The sentence of God's law, denouncing wrath and judg- ments upon the transgressors of it. Q. Do the wrath and curse of God lie upon all men whatsoev- A. Yes, as long as they are in a state of unbelief: but by Jesu» eo OF THE MISERY OF Christ all true believers are delivered from God''s wrath and curse, and inherit his favor and blessing, 1 Thess. i. 10. Gal. ii. 9. Q. Arc not these^ who are under the wrath and curse of Gody liable to all sorts of miseries? A. Yes, and particularly to these named in the answer, to wit, all the miseries of this life, death itself, and the pains of hell for ever. Q. What are the miseries of this life, which the fall maJces us liable to? A. They are very many, both in soul and body. Q. W hat are the soul miseries tvhich tec are liable to? A. Such as unbelief, blindness of mind, strong delusions, hardness of heart, weakness of memory, the bondage of sin and Satan, evil imaginations and vile affections, stu})idity and seared- ness of conscience, or else horror and despair, Rom. xi. 8. Eph. iv. 18, 19. 2 Thess. ii, U. Rom. ii. 5. Rom. i. 26, 28. 2 Tim. ii. 26. Gen. vi. 5. 1 Tim. iv. 2. Isa.xxxiii. 14. Heb. x. 27. Q. WhaHtire the bodily or external miseries ice are liable to by the fall in this life ? A. Both private afflictions and public calamities, such as dis- eases in our bodies, reproach in our names, decay in our estates, loss of relations, poverty, crosses, disappointments, sore toil and labour; as also, famine, sword, pestilence, captivity, exile, perse- cution and the like, Deut.xxviii. 16, 17,18,22,30,37. Gen. iii. 17. Ezek. v. 17. Q. Should a living man complain of those his miseries? A. No; for they are justly inflicted, and his sins deserve worse, Lam, iii. 39. Q. What worse miseries are we liable to by sin ? A. Death and hell. Q. What is meant by death in the answer? A. The separation of soul and body, at the end of this life. Q. Hath the fall brought death upon all men that ever lived in the world? Jl. By the fall it is appointed for all men once to die; and nev- er any were exempted from that sentence, save Enoch and Elijah, who were translated to heaven without tasting of death. Q. Is death the same thing both to the wicked and the godly ? A. No; for it is a punishment to the one, and a purgation to the other. Q, What kind of punishment is death to the wicked? A. It isthe king of terrors, or beginning of hell to them; it is a serpent with a fearful sting, or a messenger sent to seize and carry them to everlasting torments. Q, Is not death a punishment to the godly also? MAN'S NATURAL ESTATE. 61 A. Not properly: for though it be the consequent of sin, yet to believers, through Christ, its nature is changed, and its sting and terror removed; yea, it becomes a friend and servant to them, to pluck up sin by the roots, and carry them home to their Father's house. Q. Doth not detiik put an end to the miseries of all men ? A. No; for though it put an end to all the godly 's misery, yet in some respects it only begins the miseries of the wicked. Q. What wiseriesare they liable to after this life? A. To the pains of hell far ever. Q. What do you mean by hell? A., A place of torment, which God hath prepared for devils and wicked men; where they shall be punished with everlastintr des- truction from the presence of the Lord, 2 Thess. i. 9. * Q. H/ herein doth the pains of hell consist? A. In the pain of loss, and the pain of sv.nse. Q. What is it you call the pain of loss in hell? A. The loss of heaven, with God's glorious presence, and the society of saints and angels there for ever, Mattb. xxv. 41. Psal xvi. 11. Lukexiii. 28. Q. What do you call the pain of sense in hell? A. The dreadful pains and torments which the damned will suffer there, both in their bodies and souls. Q. What will be the torments of their bodies in hell? A. They will be cast into a lake burning with fire and brim- stone, where there shall be weeping, wailing, and enashiDs? of teeth, Matth. xiii. 42. Rev. xxi. 8. ^ & & Q. Why are these torments called the second death ? Rev. xxi. A. Because the damned there will still be, as it were, in the ag- onies of death; but that death will differ from the first in this that they will be ever dying, but never able to die. ' Q. What will be the tormen ts of the soul in hell ? A. The souls of the wicked there will be immediately liable to the strokes and lashes of G-»d's wrath, and the worm that never dieth, which will fill them with eternal anijuish and horror, Heb X. 31. Markix. 44. Q. What is meant by the itorm that dieth not ? A. An awakened conscience, that will gnaw, bite and stinff them for ever .^ . Q. How will it do that? A. By upbraiding them for their by-past sins, and for slighting he remedy offered to them : by throwing up to them the happiness they have ost, and the miseries brought upon them by their folly, and ever telling them what more is a coming. God's wrath in bell F €2 OF THE MISERY, &c. will be still wrath to come. All which reflections, improven by a despairing conscience, cannot but distress the guilty soul with such cutiing thoughts, bitter anguish, and tormentin^j stings, as cannot now be imagined, Luke xvi. 25. Heb. x. 26,27, 29.^ Q. What sort of urctth is the xcrath of God, which will he poured out upon theicickcd in hell? A. It is called in scripture, ^reai wrath, anger, fury, and re n- ery awful? A. Yes, Q. In what respects? A. In regard the wicked shall thereupon go into everlas ting punishment, and the righteous into life etemal, Matt. xxv. 4 6. Q. How will the judge's sentence be executed against the ivicn- cd? A. The devils, the executioners of God's justice, will be Vv'ai- ting on, and ready, upon the passing of the sentence, to hale away the wicked to the place of torment. Q. llill angels he judged at that day? A. Yes, evil angels. Q. How is it said that the siints shall judge angels? 1 Cor. vi. 3. A. In regard they shall approve of the sentence which Christ shall pass upon them, and upon all his enemies. Q. What ought we to learn from Christ''s coming to judg- ment? A. We should endeavor always to be ready for it, and to love his appearing; we should be diligent to be found of him in peace, and to aim at all holy conversation and godliness; and we should suspend all rash judgments till that time, Luke xii. 40. 2 Tun. iv. 8. Tit. ii. 12, 13, 2 Pet. iii. 11, 14. 1 Cor. iv. 5. Quest. 29. How are ive made ^partakers of the re- demption purchased hy Christ P Jins. We are made partakers of the ledem ptioii purchased by ChrisU by the elTectual application of it to us by his Holy Spirit. I 2 102 OF THE APPLICATION OF REDEMPTION. Q. ^^'hat is the proper office and agency of the Holy Ghost in the work of man^s redemption ? A. To apply it to elect souls. Q. Hath not each person in the glorious Trinity an eminent hand in the work of our redemption? A. Yes; the Father projected it, the Soni>urcl]ased it, and the Holy Ghost applies it. Q. What is meant by the works of our redeinption ? A. The delivering of lost sinners from sin, Satan, and the vrath of God. Q. What is meant by the purchasing of our redemption ? A. The buying or obtaining it at a valuable price. Q. Who icas it that purchased our redemption? A. Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Q. At what price did he purchase it? A. At the price of iiis own precious blood. Q. What is meant by our being partakers of this purchased redemption? A. Our being made sharers of the benefits and advantages of it. Q. What are these benefts? A. Such as pardon of sin, protection from wrath, peace with God, peace of conscience, a change of nature, sanctifying grace, the unstinging of death, resurrection to life, and eternal glory, Q, What is meant by the applying of this redemption to us? A. The making of it ours, by producing the first beginnings of it in the soul, and thereby bringing us gradually into the full possession of its benefits. We begin the possession of them in our justification and sanctification here, and we complete it ia our glorification hereafter. Q. Is it only the Holy Spirit that can apply this redemption to us effectually, and possess us of it? A Yes. Q. Cannot godly parents j ministers or gospel-ordinances do this? A. No. Q. Why is the Holy Spirit said to apply this redemption to us effectually ? A. To teach us, that all that can be done by means and in- struments to apply this redemption to us, will be inefi'ectual, without the work of the Holy Spirit. Q. Is not the Spirit''s application of this redemption as neces- sary to us, as Christ'' s purchasing of it ? A. Yes. Q. What is the difference between the purchasing and appli- cation of it? OF UNION TO CHRIST. 103 A. The first is a work done without us, but the second a work done within us. Quest. 30. Horv doih the Spirit apply to us the redemption purchased hj Christ f Jlns. The Spirit applieth to us the redemption purchased by Christ, by working faith in us, and thereby uniting us to Christ, in our eflPectual calling. Q. ^JS/liai doth the Spirit work in us, in order to apply the pur' chased redemption to us ? A. Faith. Q. Cannot we produce faith, or believe of ourselves ? A. No. Q. Is not faith an act of the believing soid? A. Yes; but still the scripture makes it God's gift to him, and the Spirit's work within him, Eph. ii, 8. Col. ii . 12. Q. Is not the Spirit of God the author or irorker of all graced A. Yes; and therefore he is called the Spirit of grace. Q. What means doth he use for tvorking faith in us? A. The word or ministry of the gospel, Rom. x. 14, 17. Q. What shall become of those ivho icant the gospel? May not the Spirit work faith in them for their salvation? A. We have no promise for his doing so. Q. What is the use of faith for applying Chris fs purchase to us? A. Faith is the grace that brings us to Christ, and is the means of our union with him. Q. What is ii to be united to Christ? A. It is to be joined to him, and made one with him. Q. Is it hereby that every believer hath an actual interest in Christ and a title to his purchase!. A, Yes. Q. What sort of union is there between Christ and believers? A. Jtis a spiritual, supernatural and mystical union, hard to be explained by any thing we find here below. It is somewhat like the union that is between a debtor and his surety, seeing by it the righteousness and satisfaction of Christ becomes the belie- ver's; or like the union that is between the head and the meni- bers, and the root and branches, seeing by it the Spirit of Christ brings vital and refreshing influences from Christ to all true be- lievers, 2 Cor. V. 21. Col. ii. 19. John xv. 5. 1 Cor. vi. 17. Q. Are not believers said to be in Christ, and Christ in believ- ers by virtue of this union ? 104 OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. A. Yes, Rom.viii. 1, 10. 2 Cor. v. 17, and xiii. o. Q. What are t/ie bonds of this union bctivecn Christ and be- lievers? A. There is the Spirit on Christ's part, taking hold of us : a nd there is faith on our part, taking hold of Christ. Q. What advantage do bclicrei's reap by this union? A. l^y it they have sympathy frotn Christ in tlieir sufferings, and communion with Christ in his fulness; and because he lives, they shall live also. Q. la there any dissohnng of this union? A. No; for death, wiiich looseth all the ties of nature, cannot dissolve this union; for Christ is united to believers' dust in the grave, as well as to their souls in heaven. Q. What must we do to be united to Christ? A. We must be deeply sensible of our misery without Christ, cast offour sins which separate us from Christ, and receive hun by a lively faith as he is ottered to us in the gospel. Q. How shall ice attain to this uniting grace of faith ? A. Let us look and cry to the Holy Spirit to work it in us. Q. When doth he that? A. In our effectual calling. Quest, ai. What is effect nal callhig P Ans, Effectual calling is the work of GocVs Spir- it, whereby, convincing us of our sin and misery, en- lightening our minds in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our willsj lie doth persuade and ena- ble us to embrace Jesus Christ, freely offered to us in the gospel. Q. Is not effectual ealling the same thing with conversion or rcgeneraiiont A. Yes. Q. Why is our conversion termed a call or calling? A. In regard that it is by the voice or word of God that we are roused from the sleep of sin, reduced from our wanderings, and brought home to himself. Q. Why is it termed effectual calling'^ A. Because it takes effect to bring the soul to God, and to dis- tinguish it from the outward call of the word, which of itself is insufticient to prevail with us; for " many are called, but few are chosen," Matt. xxii. 14. Q. What do you mean by few are chosen? A, That few are determined effectually to embrace the call. OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. 105 Q, Whose work is the inward and effectual call? A, It is the work of the Spirit of God. Q. Why is it called a work ? A. Because it is not perfected all at once, but done by several steps and degrees. Q. What are the several steps of the SpiriCs work mentioned in the answer? A. There are, 1. A work of conviction. 2. A work of illu- mination. 3. A work of renovation. Q, What is the state which the soul is called from by this work? A. From a state of sin, of darkness, of enmity, of slavery, and misery. Q. What is the state to which the soul is called to ? A. It is a state of grace, of light, of peace, of liberty, and bliss. Q. Whence is it that God doth call some, and not others? A. It is not from any worth or goodness in them, but from his own mere good will and pleasure. Q. What means doth the Spirit make use of in the calling of men? A. Chiefly the voice and ministry of the word. Q. Whether is it the voice of the law or the gospel? A. It is both; the law to shew us our misery, and the gospel to discover our remedy. Q. What is the first step of the Spirit^s work in our effectual calling? A. Conviction. Q. What doth the Spirit convince us of? A. Of our sin and misery, or the defiled and wretched con- dition we are born and lie in, till a gracious change be wrought in us. Q. IVJiat is it in sin that the Spirit doth convince us of? A. Of sin's evil, malignity, guilt and pollution j of its fountain, numerousness, aggravations and deservings. Q. By what means doth the Spirit hring men to the conviction ofsin2 A. By the law's precepts and threatenings, by rods, and by conscience. Q. May not any of these convince us of sin without the Spirit? A. No. Q. Was not this one great design of sending the Spiritt A. Yes, John xvi, 8. Q. Is there no conversion without conviction going before? A. No; for, unless we have ii in some measure, we will not see our need of Christ, nor come to him for help. 106 OF EFFECTUAL CALLIiNG. Q. Is the work of conviction alike great in all true converts? A. No; some have more, and some less, according to God's holy pleasure. Q. What degree nf conviction is necessary to all who are con- verted? A. So much as is needful to discover a man's lostness, lomake him value Christ above all things, and willing to part with all things for Christ. Q. Doth conversion always follow upon a work of conviction? A. No; for not a few, like Judas and Felix, have had strong convictions wiiich have come to nothing. Q. Whence is it that their convictions prove abortive? A. Because they stifle them, and go to the world for ease, and not unto Christ; neither are their convictions of the right kind. Q. What is the difference between convictions of natural men, and those of true penitents? A. 1. The first proceed only from a natural conscience, and the fears of hell; but the second from the operation of God's Spir- it, and a view of sin's evil, God's goodness, and Christ's sufferings. 2. The first are mainly u[)on the account of gross sins, and out- breakings ; bdt the other reaches also to heart sins, and those which are secret. 3. The convictions of natural men are cured by natu- ral means, but those of true penitents only by the blood of Christ. Q. What is the second step of the Spirits work in effectual calling? A. The work of illumination with respect to the remedy for sin. Q. Are our minds by nature dark in that respect till the Spir- it of God enlighten them? A, Yes. Q. What doth he enlighten our minds with? A. With' the knowledge of Christ our only surety and Sa- viour. Q. Is not if^norance of Christ a sad sign of one that is not effectually called or converted? A. Yes. Q. What knowledge or discoveries of Christ doth a sinner get by the Spii'itPs light? A. He is brought to know the excellency of Christ's person, offices, righteousness and fulness provided for believing sinners: he is made to see Clirist's all-sufficiency and ability to save to the uttermost, his suitableness to the various needs of our souls, and his willincrness to save all that come to him for relief. Q. What means doth the Spirit use for enlightening us with the knowledge of Christ? OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. 107 A. Ordinarily the preaching of the gospel, Acts xxvi. 17, 18. Rom. X. \7, Q, Are not then hoik the law and the gospel useful in our eon- version ? A. Yes,- the law for discovering to us our disease, and the gos- pel for shewing us a physician: the law for convincing us of sin, and the gospel for leading us to a Saviour. Q. May not the minds of some he very much enlightened under the gospel, without being called effectually, or converted? A, Yes; for Balaam was greatly illuminated: and we read of some supposed to be once enlightened, that yet may make final apostacy from Christ, Heb. vi. 4, 6. Q. How may we know if the knowledge of Christ we are enlightened with, he true and saving? A. It will be a good sign, if our knowledge humble us the more under a sense of our vileness; if it inflame our hearts with love to Christ, and a desire to be like him; if it engage us to put our trust in him for the whole of our salvation, and to hate sin as his great enemy, and to study to do the things that please him. Q. What is the third step of the SpirWs work in effectual cal- ling? A. His renewing of the will. Q. what do you mean by the Spirit'^s renewing of the will of man ? A. His making the will new and pliable, by putting new incli- nations and dispositions into it, to choose what is good and refuse what is evil. Q. Doth the Spirit, by his powerful work upon the will, offer any violence to the liberty of man'' s tvill? A. No; for he inclines it in a way agreeable to its nature, and sweetly changes its stubbornness and rebellion into a willing obe^ dience. Q. How may we know if our hearts and mils be yet renewed? A. By our embracing of Christ in all his offices, by our prefer- ring his will and glory before all earthly satisfactions; by our lov- ing the good we once hated, and hating the evil we formerly lov- ed. Q. Are we able to renew our own wills, or change them from evil to good? A. No; we can no more do it than the Ethiopian can change his skin, or the Leopard his spots, Jer. xiii. 23. Q. J^hat shall we do then to attain to this gracious change by the Spirits renewing work? A. Let us be deeply sensible of the evil and misery of sin, dili- gently wait upon the means of salvation, earnestly look to God in 108 OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. Christ, pleading for his Spirit's work upon our hearts, and care- fully entertain his motions when he begins to work. Q. What end doth the Spirit aim at in his convincing^ enlight- ening and rcneiving work in ovr calling? A. That thereby he tnay persuade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ, as freely offered lo us in the gospel. Q. What do you mean by the Spirits persuading and enabling vs to embrace Jesus Christ ? A. His prevailing with us, determining us, and making us able and willing to accept of Christ as our Saviour, and consent to the terms he proposeth to us in the Gospel. Q. What do you mean by the gospel? A. The glad tidings or joyful news of salvation through Jesus Christ, written at his direction by the prophets and apostles, and published by his messengers to lost sinners of mankind. Q. HoiD, or upon what terms^ is Christ offered in the gospel to sinners, thai they may embrace him ? A. He is offered to them as a free gift from heaven, in all his odices, of prophet, priest, and king; and they must embrace him accordingly. Q. What mean you by embracing Christ freely as he is offer- ed? A. That we must come to Christ without money or price; that is, we must be sensible of our emptiness of all good, and that we can bring no qualification nor worth to purchase or obtain Christ, but must come poor and empty-handed, willing to take Christ and his riches lo furnish us with every thing necessary for us. Q. Hoio may we know if we have thus embraced Christ in a right manner? A. By diligent examination of ourselves, and particularly try- ing if we can say, that we have embraced Christ, not only for pardon of sin and eternal salvation, but also for holiness and newness of life ; believing and depending on him as the meritorious cause and fountain of sanctification, as well as of justification and glorification. Q. Can no man thus embrace Christ until he is persuaded aud enabled by the Spirit to do it? A, No. Q. Are we naturally averse from accepting the offer of a Sa- viour? A. Yes; and therefore must be persuaded fo it. Q. Are we without strength, as ivell as averse to do it? A. Yes; and therefore we must be enabled to embrace Christ. Q. Cannot moral suasions, such as the exhortations, threaten- ings and promises of the word ^ persuade sinners to embrace Christ? OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. 109 A. No; these can no more do it of themselves, than the beams of the sun can enlighten a man born blind, or arguments can raise a dead man from the grave; for we are naturally blind and dead in sin . Q. Is then the same power requisite to our renovation and conversion, as to our creation and resurrection? A. Yes. Quest. 33. What benefits do they that are effectu- ally called partake of in this life ? Arts, They that are effectually called, do in this life partake of justification, adoption, and sanctifica- tion, and -the several benefits which in this life do either accompany or flow from them. Q. Have those who are effectually called, a title to special benefits and privileges above other persons ? A. Yes. Q. When is it that they partake of these benefits? A. They have some of them in this life, and the rest in the life to come; they have some in hand, but much more in hope. Q. What are the benefits and advantages they partake of in this life? A. They are principally three, to wit, justification, adoption, and sanctification. Q. Are all those who are effectually called, Justified, adopted, arid sanctified by God in this life? A, Yes. Q. What do you mean by these words, justified, adopted, and sanctified? A. That they have their sins pardoned, they become God's children, and are made holy. Q. Is holiness then a special benefit and privilege, as well as our duty? A. Yes. Q. Do these three great benefits come singly to those who are effectually called? A. No; for they are attended with many other blessings, that depend upon and flow from them; such as inward peace, free ac- cess to God, assurance of his love, fatherly provision, growth in grace, &c. Q. Who then are the happiest persons even in this life? A. Those who are effectually called; for they are privileged above all others. K 110 OF JUSTIFICATION. Quest, 33. rvhat is Justijication P JIns, Justification is an act of God's free grace, wherein he pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in liis sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone. Q. Doth the wortZ, justify, signify to male a person just, hy Infusing of inherent righteousness into him, as the word sanctify signifieth to make a person holy in that manner? A. No; for, if that were the meaning, it would confound justi- iication with sarictification, of which the Papists are guilty. Q. What then is the true meaning of the word justify ? -4. It is a legal or forensic word, borrowed from courts of jus- tice; and it signifies to absolve one from guilt or punishment, and to j)ronounce him righteous or innocent. Q. Whose act is it to justify a sinner? A. It is God's act; for it is God that justifieth, Rom. viii. 33. Q. Doth God justify the ungodly? A. Yes, Rom. iv. 5. Q. Is it not written, Prov. xvii. 15. He that justifieth the wick- ed is an abomination to the Lord? Will God do that himself ^ which he abhors in another? A. God indeed abhors the absolving of guilty persons without satisfaction made to justice; but, when God doth justify the un- godly, it is upon due satisfaction made to his justice. Q. May any ungodly person take encouragement from this, to reckon himself among these that arc justified? A. No; for though God doth justify those who were ungodly before tjje passing of that act, yet none of these do continue to live ungodly afterwards; and those who continue to do so, shew plainly that they never were justified persons, seeing justification and sanctification are inseparable. Q. Why do you call justification an act and not a work ? A. Because it is a thing done all at once, as the sentence or declaration of a judge; and not a work of time, carried on by de- grees, as efl^ectual calling and sanctification are. Q. What is the moving cause of this act? A. The free grace of God, that is, his undeserved love and fa- vour to sinners, without any worth or merit in them. Q, What are the constituent parts of justification? A. They are two, as mentioned in the answer, to wit, God's pardoning of our sins, and his accepting of our persons, as right- eous. Q. What is the meritorious cause of our justification? OF JUSTIFICATION. Ill A. The righteousness of Christ. Q. Is it upon the account of this righteousness that God both pardons our sins, and accepts of our persons? A. Yes. Q. What do you mean by the righteousness of Christ, by which we are justified? A, Not his essential righteousness as God, which is incommu- nicable; but his Surety-righteousness, which, as Mediator, God- man, he performed in our stead, to satisfy justice, and magnify the law. Q. What was this Surety-righteousness of Christ made up A. Of his active and passive obedience. Q. What is Chrises active obedience? A. The perfect obedience he gave to the precepts of the law in his holy life, which is imputed to believers; seeing by the obedi- ence of this one man many are made righteous, Rom. v. 1 9. Q. What is his passive obedience? A. His suffering the penalties of the law due to us for sin, whereby he gave perfect satisfaction to the justice of God. Q. If Christ gave perfect and fall satisfaction to justice for our sins, how can our justif cation he said to be of free grace? A. These two consist very well together, according to Rom. iii. 24: " Being justified freely by his grace,' through the redemp- tion that is in Jesus Chris'..'' It is whoUy free to us, seeing God doth graciously accept of a righteousness and satisfaction from a Surety, which he might have demanded from us. It is free, see- ing God hath provided the Surety for us, and furnished him to pay our debt, when it was impossible for us to find one to do it. — It is /re^, seeing God requires nothing from us but faith in tiie Surety, which faith he also promiseth freely to give us: so that our justification is<ogQiheY o^ free grace to us. Q. How is it that the righteousness of Christ becomes ours? A. By God's imputing it to us, that is, his placing it to our account, as if we ourselves had performed a perfect righteous- ness to him. Q. How is it according to truth for God to pronounce us righ- teous, who really are not so? A. God doth not pronounce us righteous in ourselves, but righteous in our Surety, Christ, who is righteousness to us in God's account, even as a creditor, having received payment from the surety, justly counts the debtor free and acquitted in law, I Cor. i. 30. 2 Cor. v. 21. Q. Wei'e the Old-Testament saints justified by Chrisfs righ- teousness as well as we? U2 OF JUSTIFICATION. A. Yes. Q. How could that be, seeing they died before ChristU righ- teousness wasj)crfor7ned? A. They believed in the promised Messiah that was to come, to be made an offering for sin, and to bring in everlasting righ- teousness; and their faith in him was accepted of God for their justijfication. Q. How doth it appear that they depended upon Christ for jusiification ? A. In regard we are told that the gospel was preached unto them: that they saw tlie promises afar off, and embraced them. They had Christ exhibited to them in the ancient prophecies, types and sacrifices: and so they viewed him as llie Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Abraham saw Christ's day afar off. Job knew his Redeemer lived. Isaiah foretells that his soul should be made an offering for sin; and he calls all men to look to him for salvation: and he points him out as one in whom we have righteousness and strength, and one in whom all the seed of Israel would be justified and should glory. Jeremiah calls him, The Lord our righteousness. Daniel says, he shall make reconciliation for sin, and bring in cverlasiing righteousness; and that for this end Messiah was to be cut off, Heb. iv. 2, and xi. 23. Rev. xiii. 8. John viii. 5Q. Job. xix. 25. Isa. liii. 10. and xlv. 22, 24, 25. Jer. xxiii. 6. Dan. xix. 24, 26. Q. By what means do we reeeive ar:d apply this righteousness of Christ? A. By faith alone, Rom. iii. 22. Q. Doth faith justify us as it is a work or act done by us ? A. No, but only as it is an instrument or hand whereby we receive and apply Christ's righteousness, which is the only ground of our justification before God. Q. Why would God have faith to be the alone instrument of our justification ? A. That it might appear to be wholly of free grace; for faith is of a self emptying quality, and ascribes all to God, Rom. iv. 16. Q. Doth the matter come all to one, when we are said some- thnes to be justified by ChrisCs nghfeousncss, and sometimes by faith ? A. Yes; for it is by the one meritoriously, and by the other in- stiumentally. Q. Arc we justified partly by Chri&Cs righteousness, and partly by our own ? A. No, we must not mix any thing of our own with Ciirist in the point of justification; therefore the aposlle Paul asserts in OF JUSTIFICATION. 113 strong terms, that we are justified by faith in Christ, without the works of the law, Rom iii. 20. Gal. ii. IG. Q. How is it then that the apostle James doth sat/, that a man is justified hij works ^ and not by faith onhj? Jarnes ii. 24. A. It appears from tiie context, that James is not speaking of our justification before God, but of the justification of a person, and of his faith, before men; so good works declare before the world that we are justified persons, and they decbre our faith io be true and lively, seein:^ they are the genuine fruits of faiih. — And therefore the apostle saith, / will shew thee mi/ faiih by my rnorks; and Abraham's faith was perfected by works, James u. 13,22. Q. Wity cannot we be justified before God by our works '1 A. Because all the world is guilty, and all our works imper- fect before God; and a just God requires a perfect righteous- ness. Q. Are good works then of no use? A. Though they cannot justify us before God, yet they are most necessary and useful to glorify God, and to evidence the sincerity of our faith; and therefore it is required of all believer-s, that they be careful to m-iintain good works, Tit. iii. 8. Q. Js there not ground to suspect the truth of a man'^s faith, and of his justif cation, where holiness and good v:orks do not appear? A. Yes; for by the same fdith that a man is justified, his heart is also purified; and the goodness of a tree is known by its fruits, Acts vv. 9. Matt. vii. 16, 17. Q. Y^ hen is it that a person is actually justified? A. As soon as he is brought actually to believe on Jesus Christ. Q. Did not God decree to justify the elect from eternity? A. Yes, but that will not infer that we are justified from ete«»- nity; no more than, because God decreed to create us from eter- nity, that therefore we were created from ail eternity. All that ■we can dr-i^v from it is, that God graciously purposed our justi- fication from eternity, and this only to take etFect upon our be- lieving' . Q. Are not the elect justified at the death or resurrection of Jesus Christ, seeing it is said that lie died for our sins, and rose again for our justification? A. They were then j'jstified virtually, but not actually; for though the price was truly then paid or completed, yet the pur- chased redemption is never actually ours, until it be applied. Q. What is tkcfir^tpjrtofjustificaiioii? A. Tne pardoning of our sins. K 2 114 OF JUSTIFICATION, Q. J^hose prerogative is it to pardon sins? A. It is God's only; for he is both the offended party, and the great Judge of all, Isa. xliii. 25. Q. Have not minisicrs power to forgive sins, seeing Ch'ist saith to them, Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted ? John XX. 23, A. That imports no more but a ministerial declarative power to pronounce from God's word, that every penitent believing sin- ner shall be forgiven; so that ministers can only declare sin to be pardoned upon the condition of faith and repentance. Q. Have not private men power to forgive sins, seeing Christ says to all, Matt. vi. 14. If ye forgive men their trespasses, ^c? A. Private men have power only to forgive private injuries done against themselves, but no power to forgive the wrong that at the same time is done to God. Q. When doth God pardon men their sins? A, When they believe in Christ. Q. Whether is pardon an act of justice, or of mercy? A It is both, Q. HoiD doth that appear? A. 1. It is an act of justice in God to pardon every penitent believer, seeing Christ their Surety hath paid their debt, 1 John i, 9. 2, It is an act of mercy likewise, seeing God is graciously pleased to accept of a Surety's payment, and to provide the Sure- ty also. Q. What is it in sin that pardon doth take away? A. The guilt of it. Q. What is that? A. Our actual obligation to punishment. Q. Doth pardon take away the demerit or deserving of sin? A. No; for the sins of believers in themselves do deserve hell, as well as the sins of others. Q. Doth pardon take away the inherence or being of sin alto- gether? A. No; for we find corruption still remaining in th^s^e who are pardoned, Rom. vii. Q. Hath every pardoned man the assurance of his pardon? A. No; for an act of pardon may be past in the court of heaven, before it be intimated in the court of conscience. Q. When God doth pardon the sins of his people, whether is it their by past sins only, or is it their future sins also ? A. All their bypast sins are actually pardoned, and they have a right to p:\rdon for their future sins, upon their actual believing and repenting; but no sin can be said to be actually pardoned until it be actually committed, and application made to tJie blood of Christ for the pardon of it. OF ADOPTION. 115 Q. Is not God angry with the sins of justijied persons? A. Yes. Q. If hat sort of anger doth he manifest against them? A. It is not vindictive wrath, as against the sins of the wicked, but only fatherly displeasure, which yet may be attended with sharp rods, and the loss of God's reconciled countenance, that cannot be recovered until they sincerely humble themselves, con- fess their sins, renew their faith and repentance, and pray earnest- ly for pardon. Q. Hoiv may we know if our sins he pardoned? A. By our love to Christ that obtained it, and our desire of conformity to him; by our mourning for sin that pierced Christ, and our fear of grieving him for the future; by the uprightness of our hearts, and our readiness to forgive others, Luke vii. 47. Kom. viii. 1. Psal. cxxx. 4, and xxxii. 1. Matt, xviii. 35. Q. What is the second part of justif cation? A. God's accepting of us as righteous in his sight. Q. IV hat is meant by that? A. It is God's adjudging us as righteous, or persons acquitted from guilt; and his giving kindly access and acceptance both to our persons and services upon the account of the righteousness of Christ that covers both. Quest. 31. What is adoption P *3.ns. Adoption is an actof God's free grace, where- by we are received into tlie number, and have a right to all the privileges of the sons of God. Q. Is adoption a scripture-word? A. Yes, Rom. viii. \5. Gal. iv. 5. Eph. i. 6. Q. IVhat is the meaning of the word; or, what is it to adopt? A. Among men it signifies, to take one that is a stranger into a family, to account him as a child or heir, and to provide for him as such. So for God to adopt believers, it signifies his bringing them who are aliens by nature into his household, his owning them as his sons and daughters, and giving them a right to the privile- ges of his children. Q. How many sorts of sons is God said to have in scripture? A. Three sorts; 1. Jesus Christ is his Son by eternal genera- tion, being of the same nature and essence with the Father, Psal. ii. 7. 2. Angels and Adam are called the sons of God, by reason of their immediate creation by him. Job xxxviii. 7. Luke iii. 38. 3. Believers are his sons by adoption, John i. 12. 1 John iii. 1. Q. \Vhose act is adoption? 11(5 OF AUOPTION. A. It is (JodV. Q. W hy is it called an act ? A. Because it is done at once. Q. What sort of an act is it? -A. An act of God's free grace. Q. Whij is it called so ? A. Becjuscil is wholly owing to liie free love and favor of God, that he adopts any of n.ankind sinners into his family. Q. Is there nothing lonely in one more than another, that viopcs God to adopt them into his famihf? A. No. Q. In what condition are sinners before they arc adopted? A. 'J'hey have neither wisdom, beauty, holmess, nor any good thing to recommend them; but are black as Ethiopians, strangers to God, children of wrath, and of the family of hell, when God adopis them into iiis family. Q. Is it not wonderful grace and love in Godj not only to par- don such rebels, but also to make them his sons and heirs? A. Yes. Q. Upon whom is tins favour conferred? Is it upon all? A. No, but only upon tliese who receive Christ by faith, John i. 12. Gal. iii. 2G. Q. Have not God'^s adopted children a right to many jmvilc- ges above others? A. Vts. Q. Mhat arc these? A. Tliey arc under (jod's fatherly protection, provision, and conduct, wliilc here below; they are allowed access to God as a Fatlicr, the Sj)irit's assistance in their prayers, and hearing of ihom; they linvc the ministry ofangels, and are heirs of God. and joint heirs with Christ, of an inheritance incorruptible. Q. Do not these j)rculiar jirivilegcs call for special duties an- swer able to them from us? A. Ye?. Q. What are the duties of adopted children to their Father t A. 'I'hey should love and honor him; they should ask his coun- sel in all things, submit to his fatlierly correction, fear to olfend him, trust him, and depend upon his care. Q, By what signs may we know if we be God's adopted chil- dren? A. By such ast))eso;if we resemble our Father,love him above all, and be heartily concerned for his glory. If we have the Spirit of adoj)tion, who always, where he is, doth excite to prayer and the study of holuicss, Rom. viii. 14. (lal. iv. G. 1 Jolm ii. 29. Q. ^\ herein doth the children of God resemble their Father? OF SANCTIFICATION. 117 A. In holiness, mercy, and beneficence to all, even to their en- emies. Q. Are not all GocPs adopted children his sons also by rcgen^ eration ? A. Ye3, they are all born again, and have new natures given them, John i. 12, 13. Quest. 35. What is sanciification ? Jins. Sanctification is the work of God's free grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole man after the image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto sin and live unto righteousness. Q. What is it to sanctify a thing or person ? A. In the scripture sense, it is to devote a thing to God's use, or to cleanse from sin, and make us holy. Q. Are notjustijtcation and sanctification inseparable? A. Yes. Q. What is the dijference^etwcen them? A. Justification is God's act or sentence without us, absolving us from the guilt of sin; but sanctification is God's work within us, cleansing us from the filth of sin; justification is perfect and equal in all believers, and is done at once; but sanctification is unequal and imperfect in this life, and is carried on by degrees. Q. What is the difference between regeneration and sanctifica- tion ? A. Regeneration is the first change of the nature by the infu- sing of all gracious habits into the soul at our conversion or effec- tual callinrr, which are all much the same; but sanctification is the continued exercise and advancement of the work of grace in the believer through his whole life. Q. Whose vjork is it to sanctify us? A. It is the work of the Holy Spirit, 2 Thess. ii. 13. 1 Pet.i. 2. Q. Why is sanctification called a work, and not an act? A. Because it is wrought and carried on by degrees. Q. Can we not sanctify ourselves ? A. No; we can no more actuate or increase grace, than we can implant it ai first. We can defile ourselves, but we cannot cleanse ourselves. Q. May not the view of our graces humble us as well as our sin':? A. Yes Q, How 30? 118 OF SANCTIFICATION. A. Our sins, hecdiuse ihey are ours; our graces, because they are none of ours: for every degree of grace is freely bestowed by God upon undeserving creatures. Q. What is the procuring cause of our sanctijication? A. The blood of Christ. Q. By what means is ii carried on in believers ? A. By means of God's ordinances and providences as he plea selh to bless them. Q. jyhat is the subject of our sanctif cation? or what part of lis is it that is sanctif ed? A. The whole man. Q. What do you mean by the whole man ? A. The whole powers and faculties of the soul, and the whole senses and members of the body; both inward and outward man is sanctified. Q. How are the powers and faculties of the soul renewed and sanctified? A. By the Holy Spirit's diffusing his gracious influences upon the heart, understanding, will, conscience, memory, and affections of the soul, whereby they are cleansed from sin, made new, spir- itual and holy, and remarkably fitted for serving and glorifying God. Q. How are the senses and members of the body sanctified? A. By changing them into a holy use, making these that before were instruments of sin, now become instruments of righteous- ness; so that the outward conversation is ordered aright according to the rule of God's word. Q. After what pattern is the change made in sanctfication ? A. After the image of God, Q, Wherein doth this image consist? A. In resembling God, and becoming like him in holiness and purity; in hatred to sin, and love to righteousness. Q. Is the image of God perfectly restored to us while in this life? A. No: for tlie work of sanctification is imperfect in the best of God's people while on this side of heaven. Q. How doth that appear? A. From the complaints they make of the remainders of sin in them, which make a continual struggle between grace and cor- ruption: and hence it is that our best duties are marred with sin. Q. Why doth God leave corruption in his people as long as they are here? A. 1. To keep them always humble under a sense of sin, and their need of a Saviour. 2. To teach them to make continual use OF SANCTIFICATION. 119 of Christ for righteousness and strength. 3. To magnify his pow- er in preserving weak grace in the midst of corruption. 4. To loose their hearts from this world, where they have such a strug- gling life, and make them long for heaven, where they shall tri- umph over corruption, and have perfect purity for ever. Q. Will sanctification never be perfected till that time? A. No. Q. Do sancti-fication and glorification differ specifically ? A. i\o, but only in degrees; for grace is glory begun, and glory is grace perfected. Q. What are the parts of sanctification mentioned in the an^ sirer? A. 'J^hey are two, to wit, mortification^ and virification; or dying to sin, and living to righteousness. Q. What do you mean by mortification, or dying to sin ? A. The gradual weakening and subduing the power of sin in our souls. Q. By what marks may ire know if we be dying to sin? A. I. If we be growing in our hatred of sm, and be laboring for its utter destruction. 2. If we be careful to withdraw every thing that proves fewel to our corruptions, and to check the first motions of sin. 3. If we bewail it before the Lord when we feel its strength, and pray earnestly against it. And, 4. If we be stu- dying to improve the death of Christ for the death of sin. Q. IVhat is imported in the other part of sanctification, living more and more unto righteousness ? A. It is to have a growing principle of spiritual life in our souls, prompting us to obey the will of God in all things, and to aim at further advancement in true holiness, Q. What is the difference betwixt morality in natural men, and true sanctification in believers ? A. The first is the product of nature, and makes some change only upon the outward life; but the second is the fruit of the Spir- it, and makes a gracious change upon the heart. The first pro- ceeds from self, and tends to self; but the second proceeds from a principle of love to God, and tends to his glory. In the first, Christ is neglected; but in the second, his strength and righteous- ness are sought to and employed. Q. Is there an absolute necessity of sanctification here, in or- der to salvation hereafter? A. Yes; for we are assured of it, that " without holiness no man shall see the Lord," Heb. xii. 14. An unsanctified man can have no communion with a holy God. Q. Jj it possible that great and notorious sinners can be sanc- tified? 120 OF THE ASSURANCE OF GOD'S LOVE. A. Yes; for the apostle Paul, speaking of the vilest of sinners, saith to the Corinthians, " Such were some of you, but ye are sanctified," iCor. vi. Jl. Quest. 36. What are the henejlts ivhich in this life do accompany or flow from justification, adoption and sanctification P Jlns, The benefits which in this life do accompany or flow from justification, adoption and sanctification, are, assurance of God's love, peace of conscience, joy in the Holy Ghost, increase of grace, and perseve- rance therein to the end. Q. How many henejlts belonging to justified and sanctijied persons are there set forth in the answer? A. Five. Q. Which is the frst? A. Assuranceof God's love. Q. Doth God bear a special love to justified persons above oth- ers ? A. Yes; they are the special objects of God's love. Q. May believers in this life attain to the persuasion or assu- rance of this love? A. Yes. Q. How doth that appear? A. From the command of God enjoining all Christians to seek after it; and from the instances of many believers who have actu- ally attained to the sure knowledge and persuasion of ihe love of God to them, 2 Pet. i. 10. Heb. vi. 1 1. Rom. v. 2, 3. Rom. viii. 16, 38, 39. 2 Cor. v. 2. 1 John iii. 14, 19, 21, 24. 1 John v. 13. Cant. vi. 3. Job xix. 25. 2 Tim. i. 12. Q. Can any person attain to this assurance without special revelation from God? A. Yes. Q. How do they come at it? A- Two ways; 1. By rational evidence and proofs from the word of God, namely, when they discover the inward evidences of these graces wrought in their souls, to which the promises of God's special love are annexed. 2. By the testimony of God's Spirit, bearing witness with their spirits, that they are the children of God, 1 John ii. 3, and iii. 14, 19. Rom. viii. 16. Q. By 7vhat marks and evidences may we know our interest in God'^s love? OF THE ASSURANCE OF GOD'S LOVE. 121 A. By our receiving of Christ in the gospel -offers, and trust- ing in him; by our love to Christ and to his people; by our affec- tion to God's laws, and care to observe them; by our opposing of all sin, and particularly beloved lusts; by our desires after holi- ness, and the like, Mark xvi. 16. John i. 12. Prov. viii. 17. 1 John iii. 14. Psal. cxix. 165, and xviii. 23. 1 John iii. 3. Phil. iii. 3. Psal.cxix. 5,6. 1 Pet. ii. 7. Q. What do you mean by the Spirifs witnessing with ovr Spir- its? Rom. viii, 16. A. His shining upon our graces, and enabling us to discern them: his concurring with the rational inferences of our spirits therefrom, and strengthening us to conclude that we are the children of God. Q. Is this assurance essential to faith, and the attainment of every believer ? A. No; for some of them may walk in darkness, and have no light, fsa. 1. 10. Q. Do any true believers lose their interest in God^s love? A, No; for nothing can separate them from the love of God which is in Christ: but they may be without the sense and assu- rance of that love. Q. Whence is it that God^s people lose the sense and assurance of his love? A, It proceeds frequently from their sloth and negligence in duty, and from their venturing upon sins against light; and sometimes from God's withdrawing the light of his countenance for wise and holy ends, 2 Pet. i. 10. Cant. v. 3, 6. Psal. li. 8, 12, 14, and Ixxvii. 7, 8, 9. Q. Why doth God withdraw from his oiim people, and deny them the sense of his love ? A. He doth it sometimes to hide pride from their eyes, and to teach them to live by faith rather than by sense: hence it may be that some of weaker grace are allowed more sensible comforts than those who are stronger. Q. How may we distinguish true assurance from presumption ? A. True assurance humbles the soul, and makes it watchful against sin; but presumption puffs up, and makes men secure. — True assurance is willing to come to the light for trial, but pre- sumption shuns the light. Gal. ii. 20. 2 Cor. vii. 1. Psal. cxxxix. 23, 24. John iii. 20, 21. Q. Should not all Christians press for the assurance of God'' s love, as a thing of great advantage to them? A. Yes. Q. What is the advantage of having it? A. It quiets the mind, and removes the fear of death; it en- L in OF PEACE OF CONSCIENCE. larges the heart with love and thankfulness to God, and gives strength and cheerfulness in the perfornaance of commanded du- ties. Q, Doth this assurance tempt or incline men to negligence or looseness? A. No; but rather excites and quickens them to diligence in body duties. OF PEACE OF CONSCIENCE. Q. Is peace of conscience a hencjit that belongs to those who arejustijicd, adopted, and sanctified? A. Yes. Q. Do all sanctified persons enjoy this benefit at all times? A. No. Q. What should hinder it, seeing God speaks peace to such persons, and forgives all their sins? A. Many times these whose sins are forgiven them, cannot be brought to forgive themselves; sometimes clouds of unbelief and temptations do sadly darken their evidences, and they relapse into untender walking, whereby their consciences may be much disquieted, Psal. xxxviii. 3, 8. Isa. lix. 2. Q. What is it that doth paciftj conscience when troubled or wouTidcd? A. Conscience being God's deputy in us, nothing less can pa- cify it than what pacifieth divine justice, namely, the blood of Christ. Q. Horn doth the blood of Christ pacify conscience ? A. By obtaining the removal of the guilt and power of sin from us, and the lifting up of God's countenance upon us. Q. Can any unbeliever have peace of conscience? A. He may have a false peace, but it is only the believer in Christ that hath true peace of conscience, Luke xi. 21. Rom. v. 1. Q. Whence doth the peace of unbelievers proceed ? A. Partly from the deceitful ness and flattery of their own liearts; and partly from the devil, that, as a strong man armed, keeps the house, Luke xi. 21. Q. \^/hat is the difference between a true and a false peace of conscience? A. True peace of conscience is attained by the use of means, such as the ordinances, earnest prayer, brokenness of heart for sin, tender and holy walking before God; it arises from faith in Christ the peace-maker, and makes a man careful of pleasing God, and fearful of olfending him. Whereas a false or presump- tuous peace comes not this way, and bath no such attendants; OF JOY IN THE HOLY GHOST. 123 nay, it is grounded upon vain imaginations, and is attended with carnal security, neglect of duty, and untender walking, 2 Thess. iii. 16. 1 Sam. i. 12, 18. Isa. Ivii. 15. Ps. cxix. 165. Gal.vi. 16. Rom. V. 1,2. Rev. iii. 17. Deut. xxix. 19. Q. Doth the belieiier''s inward 'peace come and go with his out- inard peace? A, No; for he may have great tribulation in the world, when yet he may have much inward peace through Christ. John xvi. 33. Hab. iii. 17, 18. Q. What is the best ivay to maintain our inward peace? A. By making much use of Christ who is our peace, lookmg daily to him for righteousness and strength, and strict walking by gospel rules, Eph. ii. 14. Gal. vi. 16. Q. Doth the believer'' s peace with Gad still alter with his peace of conscience? A. No. Q. How is it that the believer^s state of peace is maintained, when his sense of peace is lost? A. By reason ot'the stability of God's covenant, and the prev- aiency of Christ's continued intercession with God for his people, Psal. Ixxxix. 31, 32, 33, 34. 1 John ii. 1. OF JOY IN THE HOLY GHOST. Q. What do you mean by joy in the Holy Ghost? A. That spiritual joy, delight, and complacency, which the Holy Ghost works in his people, when he clears up their eviden- ces, or allows ihem special favours to their souls. Q. Why is this spiritual joy called joy in the Holy Ghost? A. Because he breeds and feeds this joy; hence it is called the fruit of the Spirit, Gal. v. 22. Q. What are the chief grounds of this joy ? A. Ordinarily they are a sense of our interest in Christ, and of our justification by his righteousness; or his gracious presence with us, his work in us, the success of his gospel, or a prospect of heaven, Psalm cl. 2. Isa. Ixi. 10. Hab. iii. 18, Phil. i. 25. Acts ii. 46, 47, and viii. 8. Psalm Ii. 12. Rom. v. 2. Q. Wherein doth this spiritual joy differ from the joy of the world? A. Spiritual joy is inward and pure, deep and solid; it bears up under outward troubles, and disposes the soul for all spiritual performances: but worldly joy is muddy and sensual, blown away by every cross wind, leaves the mind under uneasy refiections, ii> disposeth for holy duties, and vanisheth at the approach of death. Q. What is it that is jnosi deMructite to the true Christian'' - joy? 124 OF GROWTH IN GRACE. A. Sin, especially when it is ventured upon against light, Psalm li. 8. Q. May not hypocrites have flashes of spiritual joy at some times? A. Yes; for so had the stony-ground hearers, and John's fol- lowers, Matt, xiii. 20, John v. 35. Q, T'T Aa^ is the difference between the true spiritual joy of he* licvcrs, and the temporary joy of hypocrites? A. True spiritual joy comes in the way of godly sorrow for sin and of faith in Jesus Christ, it disposeth a man to humility and lowliness of mind, to hate sin more vehemently, resist templations more steadily, and perform duty more cheerfully: but the hypo- crite's joy being without any true foundation or right views of Christ, it keeps sin in its strength, puffs up the man with a conceit of himself, and very soon leaves him as carnal and unholy as ever. OF GROWTH IN GRACE. Q. What is meant by the word grace ? A. Sometimes grace is taken for God's good-will towards u?, that is, his mercy and favour to sinners through Christ; and it is by his grace we are said to be elected, called, justified and saved, Rom.xi. 6. Gal.i. 15. Rom. iii. 24. Epii. ii. 8. Sometimes again grace is taken for God's good work in us, or these gracious quali- ties which he infuses and plants in all justified persons, such as repentance, faith, love, &c. whereby they are sanctified and made meet for heaven, 2 Pet. iii. 18. James iv. 6. Col. iii. 16. Eph. iv. 7. John i. 16. And in this last sense grace is to be understood in the answer. Q. Is all true grace of a growing nature? A. Yes. Q. What doth the scripture compare it to in its growing? A. To the morning light, that encreaseth more and more unto the perfect day: and to the husbandman's seed, which springs and groweth up, he knoweth not how, Prov. iv. 18. Mark iv. 26, 27. Q. Wherefore is it that all true grace must grow? A. Because it is the seed of God, and every soul possessed of it is united to Christ; likewise there is a stature appointed; to which every Christian must gradually advance, that so he may be made meet for the inheritance above, 1 John iii. 9, and xv. 5. Eph. iv. 12, 13. Col.i. 12. Q. Jihcn may grace be said truly to grow in a believer? A. When it receiveth new additions or degrees of strength; which may be perceived, either, 1. When its growth is inward, in OF PERSEVERANCE IN GRACE 125 respect of heart sincerity and liveliness: or, 2. When it is out- ward, in respect of the fruits of holiness produced in the life; or, 3. When it is downward, in respect of self-abasement, and the rooting of gracious habits in the soul; or, 4. When it is upward, in spirituality and heavenly-mindedness. Q. Do believers ai all times actually grow in grace? A. No; but they are still in a growing disposition, and desirous to grow. Q. May not true grace sometimes decay ? A. Yes; for sometimes believers do leave their first love, and the good things which remain in them may be ready to die, Rev. ii. 4, and iii. 2. Q. Whence is it that grace doth decay in believers? A. Sometimes it proceeds from violent storms of temptations; but ordinarily from their unwatchfulness, their neglect of employ- ing Christ, their grieving of the Spirit, or harbouring of known sin. Q. ^Vhat are the ordinary symptoms of grace in decay? A. \. Lossofspiritualappetite, and of delight in duty. 2. Loss of wonted hatred of sin, and of tenderness of conscience, 3. Loss of desire for the coming of Christ's kingdom. 4. A growing love to the world and time's things. Q. How may we know if grace be real and true, though it be very weak? A. Wherever grace is true, sin will be felt as a burden, the soul will esteem Christ precious, his ordinances and people will be loved, and more grace and holiness will be earnestly desired. Q. What means shall we use to get weak and languishing grace brought to thrive and grow? A. We must be duly sensible of the spiritual consumption, and apply to the Physician for help; we must search if there be any unmortified lust at the root of grace, and remove it; we must look to Christ for his Spirit's influences, and blessing upon ordinances and providences," earnestly pleading his promises of quickening and strength, and that he may come as the dew ^to Israel, Psai, Ixxxv. 6. Hos. xiv. 4, 5, 6. Psal. cxix. 25, 28. OF PERSEVERANCE IN GRACE. Q. Is perseverance in grace a privilege of justijied persons? A. Yes. Q. What do you mean by perseverance in grace? A. A continuing still in the state of grace, and in the practice of godliness to the end. Q. Can no justijied person fall totally and finally from grace? L 2 12G OF PERSEVERANCE IN GRACE. A. No. Q, How are you assured of thai? 4-- From iheunchang€ableness of God, and tlie nature ofgracc; for the gifts and calling of God are without repentance; and grace in believers is a well of water springing up unto everlasting life, Koin. xi.29. John iv. 14. Q. Do all that profess Christ persevere in their prof essi on? A. No; for we read of many who have fallen from it, John vi. Q. ^Vhy do not all the professors of Christ persevere? A. Because many of them are not rooted in sincerity; and they who begin in hypocrisy do commonly end in apostacy, Matt. xiii. 20, 2irPsal.rxxviii.37. Q. May not truly gracious souls fall very foully into gross sins? A, Yes. Q . Have we any examples of such upon record ? A. Yes; we have Lot, Noah, David, and Peter. Q. IV hy are such instances recorded ? A. To teach us to distrust our own strength, to avoid all temp- tations to sin, to live and rely upon our Surety, and not to despair of mercy upon our penitent returning to the Lord. Q. Did not these who fell so foully, fall from grace? A. 1. Not totally: for though they fell from many degrees of grace, yet not from all grace; they came to have liitle faith, but not to be quite without faith. 2. Noifnally, or without recovery j for though they fell from God for a lime, yet repentance and re- covery were secured to them. Q. Arc there not many who have once looked mcll, who have become fnal apostates from God? A. Yes; but, when any fall totally and finally from God, we may conclude they were never that in sincerity which they appear- ed to be: they were only saints in profession, but not in reality, 1 John ii. 19. Q. Is it not said, the branches in Christ that hear not fruit, shall be taken away, John xv. 2. Is not that a falling from grace ? A. These fruitless branches, there spoken of, were not in Christ by faith, but by profession only. Q. Did not Adam and Solomon, who were gracious persons^ fall totally and finally ? A. As for Adam, he had no promise of perseverance, though yet it is most probable he was recovered by believing in Christ upon the promise that was freely tendered to him by God him- self And as for Solomon, we have ground to believe he was OP BKNEFJTS AT DEATH. 127 recovered by the mercy of God unto repentance, 2 Sam. vii. 14, 15. Q. Why have we so many cautions and warnings given to he- lieversin scripture, if they could not fall away from grace? A. These warnings and dehoriations are some ot the means which God makes use of to prevent their falling away. Q. Is it owing to the free will or strength of grace in believers^ that they fall not away finally ? A. No J tor Adam and angels, who had stronger grace, fell ; and so would believers, if they were not upheld by a power superior to any thing in themselves. Q. What are the main grounds of the saints'' perseverance? A. The immutability of God's covenant and electing love; their being the purchase of Christ's blood, and united to him; Christ's potent intercession, together with the power and promise of God, John X. 11,28. Luke xxii. 32. 2 Pet. i. 5. Q. What promise have believers for their perseverance in grace to the end? A. They have, among others, that in Jer.xxxii. 40. Iwillmahe an everlasting covenant with them, and I trill not turn away from them to do them good; but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me. Quest. 37. 'fV hat benefits do believers receive from Christ at death F Jlns. The souls of believers are at their death made perfect in holiness, and do immediately pass into glo- ry, and their bodies being still united to Christ, do rest in their graves till the resurrection, Q. Do the benefits which believers receive from Christ end with their lives? A. By no means; for they receive far greater benefits than ever at (3eath, and after death. Q. Whom do you understand by believers here? A. Those who give credit to the word of God, and do lieartily receive and real upon Christ for salvation as he is offered to sin- ners in the gospel. Q. Whether is it upon believers^ souls or bodies that Christ doth bestow his benefits at death ? A, It is both upon their souls and bodies. Q. ^'hat are the benefits granted to their souls at death ? A. There are two mentioned in the answer: 1. They are made perfect in holiness. 2. They do immediately pass into glory, 128 ' OF BENEFITS AT DEATH. Q. Do all believers arrive at perfection in holiness? A. Yes. Q. When do they arrive at it? A. At their death. Q. Can none attain to it during this life? A. No. Q. "^hyso? A. Because sin is never wholly rooted out of the soul till death. Q. How doth that appear? A. Both from the word of God, and our own experience, 1 Johni. 8. Rom. vii 23, 24. Q. Why must all believers be made perfectly holy at death ? A, Because no unclean thing can enter within the gates of the new Jerusalem, Rev. xxi. 27. Q. How is it that believers are made perfectly holy at death? A. Their graces are perfected, and the roots of sin plucked up out of their nature, which cannot be till the earthly fabric be dis- solved. Q. Do the souls of believers die or sleep with their bodies ? A. No: they live, and act in a separate state. Q, Whither do they go upon leaving the body? A. Into glory. Q. How soon after death? A. Immediately, without any delay. Q. Do they not go to j'vrgato?^ by the way, thai f^ey may be purged from sin, and made pure to enter into heaven? A, There is no ground for that Popish fiction in the word of God; there being no purgatory, but the blood of Christ. Q. How do you prove from scripture that they pass immedi- ately into glory? A. From these passages which tell us, that Lazarus' soul was presently carried by angels into Abraham's bosom; that the peni- tent thief was immediately glorified; that death is gain to the be- liever, and brings him to the Lord's presence; all which made the apostle desire to depart that he might be with Christ, Luke xvi. 22, and xxiii. 43. 2 Cor. v. 8. Phil. i. 21, 23. Q. What do you mean by that glory which believers immedi' ately pass into at death ? A. The immediate presence, vision, and fruition of God, which they are presently adtnitted to after death. Well may be- lievers be said then to pass into glory: for then it is that they pass into a glorious state, a glorious place, a glorious company, and glorious employment. Q. What is that glorious state tvhich believers enter into at death ? OF BENEFITS AT DEATH. 129 A. It is a state of eternal rest and nearness with God, Heb. iv. 9. Rev. xiv. 13. 2 Cor. v. 8. Q . What is that glorious place which they pass into ? A. It is their Father's house in heaven, called the King's pal- ace, in which Christ hath prepared mansions for them, Psal. xlv. 15. John xiv. 2. Q. Jfhat are the glorious company they are admitted to? A. The company of God, of Christ, of the angels, and spirits of just men made perfect, 2 Cor. v. 8. Phil. i. 21. 1 Thess. iv. 17. Heb. xii. 22, 23, 24. Q. What is the glorious employment they enter upon ? A. They will be employed continually in admiring and prai- sing of God. Q. What is it in God that will he the subject of their admira- tion and praise? A. His glorious perfections, and wonderful works; and espe- cially his redeeming love, and that amazing work of God mani- fested in the flesh, and dying for us, Rev. i, 5, and iv. 11, and v. 9, 12. Q. WhaioenefUs have believers from Christ at death, in res- pect of their bodies? A. Their bodies at death do remain in union with Christ, and do rest in their graves as in beds until the resurrection, I Thess. iv. 14. Isa. Ivii. 2. Q. Wherefore is it that believers must meet with death? A. Because it is appointed unto men once to die; and death doth pass upon all men, for that all have sinned, Heb. ix. 27. — Rom. V. 12. Q. Are none excepted from this law of death? A. None but Enoch, and Elias, who were translated to heaven without lasting of death; and these who will be found alive on the earth at Christ's second coming, 1 Cor. xv. 61. 1 Thess. iv. 15. Q. Was death appointed as the punishment of sin ? A. Yes, Rom. vi. 23. Q. Why then do believers die, seeing they are freed from all the punishment of sin, by Chrisfs suffering it for them? A. Christ might have removed death altogether from believers if he had pleased; but he hath thought fit only by his death to change the nature of it, and take all that was penal out of it; so that he hath now quite altered death to believers, turning it from an enemy to be a friend, from a punishment to be a purgation, or a special mean for bringing about their perfect sanctification, and thorough cleansing from all sin. And hence it is that death is ranked among the believer's blessings or privileges, 1 Cor. iii. 22o 130 OP BENEFITS AT DEATH. Q, Is there not a great difference between the death of a be- liever, and an unhcUcver? A. Yes; for to the one it is the effect of God's love, to the oth- er it is the punishment of sin; to the one it is his Father's servant sent to bring him home to his Father's house, to the other it is an officer of justice sent to arrest him for his fearful debts and crimes. Q. What is the difference between the graves of believers, and unbelievers ? A. The graves of believers are beds of rest, wherein they sleep in Jesus; and it is by virtue of the union subsisting between him and them, that they shall be awaked from their sleep in the morn- ing of the resurrection; but the grave is a prison to unbelievers, wherein their bodies are kept in custody until the judgment of the great day, and from which they shall be raised by the power of God their terrible Judge. Q. How can there be any union between so glorious a person as Christ, and our vile bodies ivhen rotting in the grave ? A. Not only because the covenant-relation which Christ stands in to believers reacheth to their very dust, but more especially because there is a mystical union between Christ as the head, and believers as the members of his mystical body; and, their dust being parts of that body mystical, Christ doth still look upon the same as related to him. Q. Since death doth dissolve the union between the soul and body, why doth it not dissolve the union between Christ and the body? A. Because the mystical union that is between Christ and his people is in its nature indissolvable, so that death cannot loose it, as itdotli other unions and relations; but in this respect it is like the hypostatical union that is between the divine and human na- ture in the person of Christ: for, when Christ died, the hypostati- cal union still remained, his divine nature being united both to his soul in heaven, and to his body in the grave; so, wlien believ- ers die, the mystical union still remains, Christ their head being united both to their souls in heaven, and to their bodies lying in the grave. Q. Are all believer'' s bodies laid in graves? A. No, strictly spealdng; for some martyrs have been burnt in fires to ashes, some devoured by wild beasts, and some drowned in the sea: but the places wheresoever the bodies of sucli are put to corrupt, are to them as their graves : and thence will Christ bring them. Q. hi what respect is the belicrer''s death called a sleep? A. Because, as sleep doth ease and refresh the man that is OF BENEFITS AT THE RESURRECTION. 131 weary with toil and labour; so death doth ease the weary believer of all his toil and struggling with sin, Satan, and the world. — Again, death is a sleep to the believer, in regard he is to be waken- ed again from it in the morning of the resurrection, Psalm xvii. 15, and xlix. 14. Q. TPhy are believer^s graves called beds of rest? A. Because therein they rest from all their afflictions and la- bours in this world ; from the wicked's persecutions, Satan's temp- tations, and sin's workings. Q. How long shall they rest in their graves? A. Till the resurrection. Quest. 38. What benefits do believers receive from Christ at the resurrection P •Ins, At the resurrection^ believers, being raised up in glory, shall be openly acknowledged, and ac- quitted in the day of judgment, and made perfectly blessed in the full enjoying of God to all eternity. Q. What is meant hy the resurrection here spoken of? A. The rising of all the dead from their graves, small and great, just and unjust, who have lived in all ages of the world, from the creation of it, unto the last day, Acts xxiv. 15. Rev. xx. 12. Q. How doth resurrection differ frojn creation? A. Creation is the making of a new body out of the earth, that did not subsist before; hwi resurrection is the raising up again of the same body out of its former dust. Q. When is this universal resurrection to he? A. At the last day, when Christ shall come to judgment. Q. How do you prom the truth and certainty of such a resur- rection ? A. From the almighty power of God, that is abundantly able to raise the dead ; and from the holy scriptures, wherein God ex- pressly declares he will raise them. Q. What was the cause of the Sadducees^ error, who denied the resurrection ? A. Their not knowing the two great foundations of this doc- trine, namely, the scriptures, and the power of God, as Christ told them, Matt. xxii. 29. Q. How could they he ignorant of this doctrine of the resur- rection,from the scriptures of the Old Testament, seeing Joh and Daniel plainly told them of it? Job xix. 26, 27. Dan. xii. 2. A, The Sadducees had little regard to any of these writings, 132 OF BENEFITS AT THE RESURRECTION. except the five books of Moses, which they imagined gave no hint of the resurrection, or of a future state; but our Lord did plainly evince the contrary from these very books, to the conviction of all, Matt, xxii, 31, 32, &c. Mark xii. 26, 27. Q, How did Christ prove the resurrection, and a future state, from the books of Moses? A. From Exodus iii. IG, where God in the bush spoke to Mo- ses, long after Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were dead, saying, " / am the God of Abraham^ and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacobs Now, seeing he saith not, Iwas their God; but, 1 am their God: ouf Lord reasons from it. He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living. And seeing the covenant rela- tion still stands, their souls must then be living, and also must be united again to their bodies, to which they have an innate incli- nation, that so they may be made for ever happy in the enjoyment of their covenanted God. Q. But, have ive not far clearer discoveries of this doctrine in the New Testament ? A. Yes, in many places of it. Q. How is it credible thai the dead bodies of men, after un- dergoing innumerable different alterations, should afterwards be raised again to what they icere? A. It should in no wise bethought incredible, that God should raise the dead : for if his power was able to raise the whole world out of nothing, it cannot be thought hard for him to raise our bodies out of their former dust, Acts xxvi. 8. Q. Hath not God given us many proof s and instances ofhi^ power to raise the dead? A. Yes, as in the raising of the widow of Zarephath's son by Elijah, the Shunamite's son by Elisha, the dead man at the touch of Elisha's bones, Dorcas by Peter, Eutychus by Paul, besides the resurrection of Christ himself, and many that were raised by him while he was on earth, 1 Kings xxvii. 2 Kings iv. and xiii. Acts ix- and XX. Matthewxxvii. Lukevii. Matthew ix. Johnxi. Q. Doth not the nature and peifection ofGod^s infinite justice require that there should be a resurrection ? A. Yes; for seeing the bodies of the wicked have been actors in their sins, it is just they should share in the punishment of them; and believers' bodies having been instruments in God's service, it is agreeable to equity that they should share in the re- ward and glory conferred upon them. Q. Have you not some peculiar arguments for the resurrection of believer'' s bodies? A. Yes: the resurrection of Jesus Christ their head, and the nature of God's covenant with believers, are certain and satisfy- ing arguments for it, OF BENEFITS AT THE RESURRECTION. 133 Q. Will the dead he raised ivitk the very same bodies they had when they were alive? A, Yes. Q. How do you prove that? A. Because, these very bodies being the instruments of piety or vice, it is just that these, and no other, should partake of the reward or punishment. Again, if they were not the same bodies, it would be more properly a new creation than a resurrection. — But Job put the matter out of doubt, by assuring us that the bo- dies will be the very same, Job xix. 26, 27. "And though after my skin, worms destroy this body, yet in ray flesh shall I see God: whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another." Q. Will not the bodies of believers, when raised^ differ from what they are now ? A. Not in regard of their substance or essence, though they will differ very much in respect of qualities. Q. What will be the different qualities of believerh bodies when raised againt A. Here they were weak, sickly, corrupt and dying bodies, and called vile bodies, as being the instruments of much sin ; but then they shall be strong, healthful, pure, spiritual, incorruptible, im- mortal and beautiful bodies, Phil. iii. 21. I Cor. xv. 42, 43, 44, 52, 53, 54. Q. How are believer^s bodies said to be raised in glory, and to be made conformed to Christ'^s glorious body? A. In regard they shall partake of his glory; for Christ's body shall shine as the sun, and theirs shall shine like so many bright stars round about him; only all their glory will be borrowed from Christ their head, Q. Will there not be a great difference betwixt the resurrec- tion of the just and unjust? A. Yes; for the saints will be raised to eternal life, and that by virtue of Christ's resurrection, and of their union with him; but the wicked shall be raised to condemnation by virtue of the power and justice of God, which shall bring them like malefactors from pri- son to the judgment-seat. The saints shall rise with glory and triumph amidst angels attending them; but the wicked shall rise with trembling, and horror, having most deformed and ghastly looks, as men going to be sentenced to everlasting burnings. Q. What will be the great means of raising the dead at the last day? A. The voice of th^ archangel, and sound of the last trumpet, which shall give such a powerful summons to the dead, that none can sit; all thereupon must rise and appear before their Judge. AI 134 OF BENEFITS AT THE RESURRECTION. Q, Will there not be a speedy separation made betwixt the righteous and wicked in that day? A. Yes; the angels will then be employed to separate the godly from the wicked, and gather them all together in one blessed company. Q. How shall believers then be disposed of? A. They will be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air. Q. What privileges shall believers have at the judgment-seat above others? A. Christ will place them on his right-hand; he will openly acknowledge and acquit them: lie will declare their right to the glorious inheritance prepared for them, and invite them to take possession of it; he will cause Ihem to sit with him as assessors in judging wicked angels and men, Q, What do you mean by Chrisfs open acknowledging of be- lievers in that day ? A. His public owning of them as his elect and redeemed ones, Q, Whom doth Christ say heicill acknowledge for hiSy at that day? A. Those who own and confess Christ now. Q. Whom will Christ deny in that day? A, Those who disown and deny Christ novV, Matt. x. 32, 33. " Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will 1 confess also before my Father who is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will 1 also deny before my Father who is in heaven." Q. What do you mean by Chrisfs open acquitting of believers in that day ? A. His public justifying and absolving of them from all the guilt of their sins; and his vindicating and clearing them from all the world's slanders and aspersions. Q. Are not believers acknowledged and acquitted by Christ before this time? A. Yes; he doth it in this world when their sins are pardoned, and he intimates this to them by his Spirit''s bearing testimony with their consciences, Rom. viii. 16,33. 1 Johniii. 21. Q. How doth CAm<'5 acknowledging ctwfi acquitting o/'JeZkr- ers now, differ from his doing it at the judgment- scat? A. 1. In respect of promulgation; the frst is secret in the be- liever's bosom, the second is public before men and angels. 2. In respect of subjective certainty; the believer may doubt o^ the frst, but he cannot doubt of the second, it being a judicial sentence pronounced by the Judge's own mouth with the greatest solemni^ OF BENEFITS AT THE RESURRECTION. 135 Q. What will be the effect of this acknowledgment and acquit- tal? A. It will forever remove all doubts and fears from believer's Iiearts, and fill them with joy unspeakable and full of glory. — Hence this day is called the time of refreshing to them, Acts iii. 19. Q. Should not the faith of this acknowledgment and acquit- tance by Christy encourage us to own Christ in his iterson, ojices and truths, in the face of all dangers? A. Yes. Q. How shall we attain to that happy resurrection and acquit- tance at the last day? A. We must labour to be found in Christ* and cloathed upon with his righteousness; we must constantly adhere to Christ and his truth, advance in the work of mortification, and study holiness in all manner of conversation. Q. When Christ the Judge doth pronounce the sentence of ab- solution and condemnation, will not the execution thereof speedily follow ? A. Yes; for, after passing the sentence it is added. Matt. xxv. 46. " And the wicked shall go away into everlasting punishment; but the righteous into life eternal." Q. Will not the wicked be made to acknowledge the justice of the sentence against them ? A. Yes, because Christ, in passing the sentence, gives them what was their own former wish and desire* Q. What ivas that? A. The absence of God ; as they said to God here. Depart from us; so Christ saith to them then, Depart fro2n me. Q . Will not the saints after their sentence enter immediately upon perfect happiness? A. Yes. Q. What will be their happiness after the judgment is over? A. They shall be made perfectly blessed in the full enjoyment of God to all eternity. Q. What is included in perfect bliss? A. Perfect freedom from all evil, and full enjoyment of all good. Q. What evils will believers be freed from in heaven? A. From all manner of sin, guilt, or pollution; from all incli- nations or temptations to sin; and from all the bitter fruits and etfects of sin, such as complaints, fears, or trouble of any kind Q. When is it that a man enjoys all thai is good? A, When he attains to the full enjoyment of God. Q. Can we attain to that here upon earth ? 136 OF MAN'S DUTY TO GOD. A. No; for though God may be enjoyed by his people in some measure here, when they attain to communion with him in his ordinances; yet the full enjoyment of God is reserved for heaven hereafter. Q. Wherein doth the f till enjoyment of God in heaven consist? A. 1. In being admitted to his glorious presence. 2. In hav- ing the immediate beatific vision of his fr-ce. 3. In having the full persuasion and sense of iiis love. 4. In being made like iiim. 5. In having fulness of delight and satisfaction in God as our ev- erlasting portion . Q. Is it -possible that any creature can fully enjoy God? A. No creature can enjoy God fully, as God enjoys himself; but believers have such enjoyment of God in heaven, as fills them, in the measure they are capable of. Q. How can any man see his face, when he is the invisible God? A. He is invisible to the eye of the body, but not to the eye of the mind. Q. How can a creature be made like io him that is infinite? A. The holine.«!S and purity of the rational creature is some sbadov/ or picture of the infinite holiness of God. Q. How long shall believers be blest with the full enjoyment of God in heaven? A. Not for days or years, but for all eternity; and this is the ingredient that will exceedingly sweeten their happiness above, that it is without end, and they shall be ever with the Lord, 1 Thess. iv, 17. Q. How is God said to be all in all in heaven ? A. It imports these things; J. That saints will be satisfied there from God alone. 2. That there will be no need there of these subordinate things, out of which they used formerly to bring comfort. 3. That every thing they before have found comforta- ble, will all be eminently found and enjoyed in God. Q. Will not the saints be continually employed in adoring^ praising, and worshipping God in heaven? A. Yes. Q. Will net their worship and adoration above far transcend the most rcfned xcorship upon earth? A. Yes, in regard there will be no mixture of sin, no wander- ing, no hypocrisy, no imperfection in llie worship above: they will ;ict above with the highest delight and constancy, without any weariness or intermission. C^iiest 39. What is the duty which God requireth of man P OP MAN'S DUTY TO GOD 137 Jlns, The duty which God requireth of man, h obedience to his revealed will. Q. Doth this question begin the second pari of the Catechism? A. Yes. Q. What is the difference between the fast and the second part of the Catechism? A. The first part doth treat of matters of faith, and what man is to believe concerning God ; the second part doth handle mat- ters of practice, and what is man's duty towards God, Q. Are not these the two great lessons which the scriptures principally teach us ? A. Yes; and as we have heard the first, so we ought to be at- tentive to the second; for man has something to do, as well as something to believe. Q. What do you mean by duty here? A. That which a man oweth to God, or ought to do for God Q. What do you inean by obedience? A. A man's going in with the will of God, either m what he commands or forbids. Q. What is the rule of our duty and obedience? A. The revealed will of God. Q. What do you mean by God''s revealed will? A. God's mind discovered and made known to us in the scrip - tares. Q. Why may not the traditions or inteniions of men he our rule? A. Because God doth reject all will-worship and superstitious performances, sayinif, " Who hath required this at your hand?'"' Isa. i. 12. ^ Q. Hath God any other will besides his rei'caled will? A. Yes, his secret wiij, Q. What is the difference between God''s secret and reveided will ? A. God's secret will is his eternal counsel and decrees concer- ning all events whatsoever, v/hich is not knov.-n till they come ta pass; but God's revealed wnll is that which he declares and lays before us as our duty, that we may practice and follov/ it Q. Is God''s secret vcill no part of our duty? A, No; for " secret things belong unto the Lord our God, bul those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our chil- dren," Deut. xxix, 29. Q. Upon what account is our obedience and service fiue to God? "' A. Because God is our creator, our preserver, our benefuctor,. and our supreme lord and lawgiver 138 OF THE MORAL LAW. Q. Is there not ohedicnce due to others besides God? A. Yes; servants must obey their masters, children their pa- rents, and subjects their magistrates, l)ut not as they are bound to obey God. Q. What is the difference between the obedience we owe to God, and that we owe to man? A. We must obey God for his own sake, and because of his su- premo authority; but ^^e must obey men our superiors, chiefly be- cause God enjoins it, and because their commands are agreeable to his will. Q. What is to be done when the commands of God and of ■men are opposite to one another? A. In that case we are to obey God rather than man, Acts iv. 29. Q. What sort of obedience is it that is acceptable to God? A. It must be sincere, universal, and constant ; it must proceed from right principles, namely, from a renewed heart, from faith, and from the love of God, and of Jesus Christ; and it must be di- rected to right ends, namely, to advance the honor and glory of God. Q. Can we merit any thing at God'^s hands by our obedience? A. No, but must count ourselves unprofitable servants after we have done our best. Our best performances are imperfect, so that it is by Christy's obedience, not our own, that we must be sa- ved. Q. Is it our duty notwithstanding to study to obey God in tJie best manner we can? A. Yes^ because God commands it Q. Will not God accept of our obedience if sincere , though attended with it:iperfcction ? A. Yes, upon the account of Christ^s merits and intercession. Q. Is it not a yoke for men to be bound to constant obedience and service to God all the days of their lives? A. No; for these who know God, and love him, count his ser- vice their greatest freedom. Psalm cxix. 45. Q, Will they be free from his service in heaven? A. No; for there his servants shall serve him, and count Ihia their greatest happiness. Rev. xxii. 3. Q. Will not their service in heaven differ much from what it is now? A. Yes; for there they will serve God without sin or weari- ness. Quest. 40. What did God at first reveal to wan for the rule of his ohedience? OF THE MORAL LAW. 139 ^ns. The rule which God at first revealed to man, for his obedience, was the moral law. Q. Is man appointed to be under the obligation and direction of a law? A, Yes. Q. Whi/so? A. Because, being made with rational faculties for the ser- vice of his Creator, he must needs be accountable to God for his actions. Q. l\kat is the use of a law to ?nen ? A, To shew them what is sin, and what is duty. ■Q. What is the law that was first given to men? A. The moral law. Q. What do you mean by the moral laic ? A. That law which is the perpetually binding rule of our man- ners and practice, being the unalterable declaration of the will of God concerning the duties of rigbteousnes?, which all men do owe to God and their neighbours, in all ages of the world; which law is briefly summed up in the ten commandments. Q. Why is it cabled moral? A. Because it is a perpetual rule for regulating our manners and conversation both towards God and man. Q. How can the moral law be said to be the first rule revealed to man, seeing the ten commandments were only given at Sinai-, above two thousand years after man was created? A. The moral law notwithstanding was the first rule, seeing it was written on the heart of man at his first creation, he being made after the image of God. Q. Doth this law still remain written upon man^s heart? A. The moral law being agreeable to the light of nature, tho' it be sadly obscured by the fall, yet some relics of it are to be found on the hearts of all mankind. Q. Is the moral law binding upon the heathen world, who have not the scriptures to maJvC it known to them? A. Yes; it is binding upon all mankind, seeing it was fully made known to man at his first creation, and which knowledge he iost by his own fault. And though tjie heathen want the ben- efit of scripture light, yet so much of the moral law is made known to them by the light of nature, as is sufficient to leave them without excuse for their disobedience, Rom. ii. 14, 15. Q. If the moral law be natural, what need was therefor wri- ting it to us in the Bible? A. 1. Because the feill of man had wofully darkened our minds, and obscured the knowledge of this law. 2. God would 140 OF THE MORAL LAW. hereby shew that he is the author of the law and light of nature. 3. He designed to leave sinners the more inexcusable. Q. Can any man obtain salvation by his obedience to the mor- al laic? A. No. Q. Can any man now obey this law ijcrfectly ? A. No. Q. Is it just for God to require 'perfect obedience to the law, when no man is able to give it? A. Yes; for God may justly demand what he hath a right to, though we have lost it by our own fault. God gave man at his creation, power to obey perfectly, which he squandered away; now, though a debtor do disable himself for paying his debt, the creditor doth not thereby lose his right to ask it. Q. Why is the law given to men, seeing none can obtain life by it? A. To be a restraint to sin, and a rule of righteousness; and particularly, the law is given to be a school master to bring men to Christ, Gal. iii. 24. Q, How doth the law as a school master bring men to Christ? A. As a school master by his threats and whips doth excite dull scholars to learn knowledge for their good, so the law by its challenges, convictions, threatenings and curses, doth awake se- cure souls to see their sins and danger, and to flee to Christ for a perfect righteousness to answer the demands of the law, and to shelter them from its curses. Q, Doth the law lead all men to Christ? A. No. Q. For what use is the law to them who are not led to Christ ? A. It serves to render them inexcusable, if they continue still in their Christless state, after their sin and danger are discovered to them by the law. Q. Is the law of any use to the regenerate, who are already brought to Christ? A. Yes; it serves to shew them how much they are bound to Christ for fulfilling it, and enduring its curse for them ; and to engage them to live holy and thankful lives to his glory: and par- ticularly, the law is given to them as a rule of life, that they may order their conversations by it. Q. How can the moral law be a rule of obedience under the gospel, seeing it is said of believers that they are not under the law, but under grace? Rom. vi. 14. A. Tlie meaning is, that believers are not under the law as a covenant of works, being delivered from thecursingand condem- ning power of the lav; by their Surety Christ. But though it be OF THE TEN COxMMANDMENTS. 141 not a covenant to them, whereby they are either to be justified or condemned, yet it is still continued as a rule, by which ihey are to regulate both their hearts and lives, Rom. iii. 31, and vii. 7, 12. Tit. ii. 11, 12. 1 Cor. ix. 21. Q. How is it Christ is said to be the end of the law for righ- teousness tons? Rom. x. 4. A. In regard Christ doth answer the primary design of the law under the first covenant, which was to bring men to a perfect obe- dience or righteousness for their justification; this we cannot now find by the law, therefore we must seek it in Christ where it is to be found. The end and scope of the law is now gained in Christ, seeing he is that to a believer, which the law would have been lo him, if he could have perfectly kept it, namely, righteous ness, justification, and salvation. Q. Doth the moral laic jyreach Christ to us? A. No; but God mercifully makes use of it as a spur to excite men to flee to Christ for salvation. Q. How doth it that? A. By shewing lo men that they have destroyed themselves, and that they cannot be their own Saviour; and so it becomes a school raasier to bring them to Christ, as was before explained, Q. What is it then that preacheth Christ to men, and shows them plainly the way of salvation? A. The gospel. Q. What do you mean hy the gospel? A. Any part of the Old and New Testament that brings to us the glad tidings of salvation, or points out the way to it; for the word gospel signifies glad tidings, or good news. Q, Are any news so welcome or refreshing to sensible sinners, as the news ichich the gospel brings? A. No news are so joyful as the doctrine of free grace, no ti- dings so sweet as the news of pardon, the news of a Saviour and of salvation to the chief of sinners. Q. Are the law and gospel opposite to one another? A. No; for the one is subservient to the other, Gal. iii. 21. 1 Tim.i. 9, 10,11. Rom. iii. 21. Q. Did God give any other laws to men besides the moral law? A. Yes; he gave unto the Jews thejudicial and the ceremonial law, which were explained before under the 14th Question. Quest. 41. Wherein is the moral laiv summarily comprehended P Ans, The moral law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments. M^ OP THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. Q. IVhal mean you hy the law's being summarily comprehend* ed? A. That the law of God, or moral law, which is contained at large in the whole Bible, is briefly, or in few words, summed up in the ten commandments: and these ten commandments are no more but q very short sum of the moral law, though they be u most comprehensive sum of it. Q. How are the ten commandments commonly divided? A. Into two tables: the first four commandments make the first table, containing our duty to God; the last six commandments make the second table, containing our duty to our neighbour. Q, How do the Papists divide these commandments? A. Though they cannot deny them to he ten in number, a nd these ten to be divided into two tables, seeing the scripture so expressly doth assert both, Deut. iv. 13, yet they make but three in the first table, and seven in the second; designing this way to cloak their worshipping of images: for they would gladly con- ceal the second command, which strikes directly against them, by making it a pendicle of the first; and so they reckon the first and second commandment to be but one. And, that they may still have the number of ten commandments, they divide the tenth into two. Q. What absurdity is there in this way of doing ? A. Jt is against the plain sense and scope of the words of the decalogue. For the first and second commandments are evi- dently distinct, the first prescribing the right object of worship, and the second the right way of worship. And as for the tenth commandment, it appears plainly, from the tenor of it, to be but one; the scope of it being to prohibit men to covet any thing that belongs to their neighbours: so that, if it was at all to be divided, it should be divided at least into six commands, or rather into as many commands as there are tilings wliich are our neighbours'. Q. Hhcre were the ten commands jirs^t promidgatcd ? A. At Mount Sinai. Q. After what manner was it done? A. VViih the greatest solemnity and terror: for the mount was railed about, that none might touch it; the angels attended; the glory of God visibly descended in a cloud; there were ihunder- ings, lightenings, the sound of a trumpet, and God's voice was heard; the mountain shook, the people trembled, and even Moses himselfdid quake — and lastly, God with his own finger did en- grave the ten commandments upon two tables of stone. Q. Why was the law given in this manner? A. 'J'o possess the world with awful thoughts of the lawgiver, and to shew them the danger of breaking his holy law. OF THE SUM OF THE COMMANDMENTS. 143 Q. Jl^kat are the properties of this law ? A. h is holy, just, good, spiritual, and exceeding broad, Rom. VII. 12, 14. Psal.cxix. 96. Q. Why is it called spiritual ? A. Because it reacheth to the thoughts and frame of the heart, as well as to the outward life and conversation. Q. Why is it called broad ? A. Because of the large extent and comprehensiveness of its meaning. Q, In what respect is the latv so comprehensive? A. In many respects: as for instance, when it forbids any sin, it doth at the same time command the contrary duty; and, when It commands any duty, it doth forbid the contrary sin; and when any sm is forbidden, all inward motions and affections to it, all degrees and appearancesof it, all temptations, means, words, or gestures tending to it, are also forbidden: and when any duty is commanded, the inward frame and affections suitable to it, and the means and helps for promoting it, are likewise enjoined. Q. Why did God write this law upon tables of stone? A. To teach us the lasting obligation of it, and that we should write It on the tables of our hearts, or pray to God to.do it for us, Q. Can any man attain to a conformity to this holy law in all things, in respect of his heart, words, and actions? A, No. Q. Are we not liable to the curse and condemnation of the law, if we break it, or come short of it in any thing? A, Yes, Q. How then shall we be shelteredfrom this curse? A. By looking by faith to our surety Jesus, and to his perfect obedience and righteousness to answer for us, Quest. 42. What is the sum of the ten command^ merits P Jins. The sura of the fen command ments is, To love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind ; and our neighbour as ourselves. Q, What mean you by the sum of the commands? A. The main substance or life of them. Q. What is the sum of the first table of the law? A. Love to God, Q. What is the sum of the second table? A. Love to our neighbour. 144 OF TBE SUM OF THE COMMANDMENTS. Q. Why are the two tables summed up in love to God and our neighbour? A. Because love is the great spring of all obedience to them; for, where true love is to God and our neighbour, all the duties required in both tables will certainly follow. Q. How is it that we ought to love the Lord? A. As our God, and with all our heart, soul, strength, pUB mind, Matt. xxii. 37. Q, V['hat is imported in loving the Lord as our God? A. That we must choose him for our God, and give up our- selves unto him. Q. What is imported in loving the Lord with all our heart, soul, strength, and mind? A. It imports the sincerity, ardency, activity, and supremacy of our love to God; that we ought to love and serve him with our whole powers, and faculties, and above all other things whatso- ever. Q. What are these things we ought to love the Lord above? A. Above all things that we enjoy on earth, such as our mon- ey, or estates, our houses, or lands, our children, or reUtions, our liberties, or even our very lives. Q. What reason is therefor loving the Lord above all thi7igs ? A. Because he is the author of all; his excellency infinitely transcends all; and from him we have our all; even our being, our breath, our souls, our strength, our relations, and every thing else. Q. May not a man lawfully love his relations and possessions in the world? A. Yes, provided his love be not excessive. Q. How may we know if our love to things in the world be ex- cessive ? A. It is a token it is so, when the thoughts of these things jus- tie our spiritual thoughts; and when they come to get our first thoughts in the morning, or our last at night; or when the impres- sions of worldly things abide longer with us than of things spiri- tual . Q. How shall we know if we love God above all things? A. It would be a good sign if we could say, that we value the favour of God more than that of any creature; and that we are more affected with the loss of God's favour than with any worldly loss; and that we would choose rather to displease all the world, than to offend him. Q. Who is meant by our neighbor that we ougJu to love ? A. Every man is our neighbor, and therefore we should bear afiection to all men. OF THE PREFACE, &c. 145 Q. What mean you hy loving our neighbor as ourselves? A, That we should love others with the same truth and sin- cerity of love, as we do ourselves; or, as our Saviour explains it in that golden rule, Matt. vii. 12, we should be ready to do to others as we would have them doing to us; and we should not do that to others, which we would not have them doing to us, were they placed in our circumstances, and we in theirs. Q. Should (according to this rule) a robber be spared, because he woidd spare those who would punish him; or a drunkard hai>e what liquor he demands from us, because he would give it to Ui if it was in his power ? A. The rule is not to be understood of self-love that is corrupt and vicious, but of self-love that is natural and innocent; it is only this that ought to be the standard of doing to our neighbor. In doing as we would be done to, we must act from a w^U in- formed judgment, and not from any corrupt bias to sin or vice. Q. Are we bound to love our neighbour with the same degree of love as we bear to ourselves? A. No, but only with the same sincerity of love. Q. Ought we to love all men alike? A. No; we ought to love all men indeed with the love of be- nevolence, but the saints only with the love of complacency Psalm xvi. 6. ' ' Q. Are there not many who break this law of love to their neighbour? A. Yes; namely, these who backbite their neighbour, who wish them evil, are grieved at their prosperity, or are inwardly glad of their hurt. Quest. 43. What is the preface to the ten com- mandments? Jlns. The preface to the ten commandments is in these words, " I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.'' Quest. 44. What doth the preface to the ten com- mandments teach us? Ans. The preface to the ten commandments teacb- etb us, that, because God is the Lord, and our God, and Redeemer ; therefore we are bound to keep all bis commandments. N UQ OF THE PREFACE Q. TlJiat mean you by a preface? A. Something that is spoken or written before, in order to in- troduce another thin". Q. What is the design of the preface to the decalogue? A. To lay before us some reasons and arguments to enforce the keeping of the commands. Q. Why doth God mahe use of arguments to persuade men to obedience, seeing he is the absolute iSovereign of the world, uho may command what he will? A. 1. 'I'o show his condescension in dealing with man, who is a rational creature, according to the principles of his nature. — t. To teach us that obedience to God is our reasonable service. 3. To teach us that he would have all his people to serve him willingly, and from free choice. Q, V/hat arguments doth God make use of in this preface to er force obedience to his law ? A.. They are three; the first is taken from his sovereignty over us, 1 am the Lord; the second from his covenant relation to us, 1 am thy God ; the third from the redemption he hath wrought for lis, " I have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the bouse of bondage." Q How is it said, of this preface and the ten commands, that God spake all these words, Exod. xx. 1. Was it only as he fqyokc the rest of the Bible? A. No; for other parts of the Bible, God spoke only mediately by the mouth of his prophets; but these words were spoke im- mediately by God himself. Q. How can God be said to speah, who hath no mouth, tongue or organs of speech? A. God speaks not as we do: but it is easy for his almighty power to form a voice in the air, and to utter articular words when he pleaseth. Q. Should it not engage us to a special regard of these w ords that God spake them himself? A. Yes; for, where God hath a mouth to speak, we should have an ear to hear. Let us carefully hear God when he speaks his laws to us, as we would have God to hear us when we speak in prayer to him. Q, What force is there in that argument for our obedience, I am the Lord ? A. It doth import, that he is JEHOVAH, the eternal, inde- pendent, self-sufficient, immutable, and almighty Creator, and supreme Sovereign, who hath being in and from himself, and ^ives being to all things; and therefore we his creatures and sub jects owe to him ?l11 obedience. TO THE TEN COMMANDMEiNTS. 147 Q. What is the force of that argument, 1 am thy God? 2 It imports that we h:ive chosen God for our God: and that he hath owned us for his people, and bestowed peculiar mercies on us: and therefore our covenant interest in him should sweeten all his commands, and strongly engage us to ^ ll vlhi not that promise to believers, I will be your God, in- clude greater blessings than any other promise m the covenant of ^T^ Yes: for it hath in it, 1 will not only give you pardon, give you Heaven, but I will give you myself, a who e Deity, a JMIU- VAH: all 1 am, all [ have, all I can do, sha I be yours. I wn not only be your friend, your Father, your husoand, but I wi.l be vour God. All the divine attributes are yours, to make you happy; yea, all the persons of the glorious Trinity are your?, to contrive, carry on, and accomplish the work of your salvation Q How shall ice come to get an interest m God as om God / 2' We must believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and heavthy ac- cept of him as our Mediator, who by his death hath made atone- ment fo- all who believe in him, yea, hath purchased tor them reconciliation with God, and a covenant relation to him as their q' What force is there in that argument [I have brought thee out of the land of Egypt] to engxgc us to obedience, wao iccre never in Es:ypt? „ ^ ,, A Though we were not in the earildy Egypt, yet we are ad by nature ii^ the spiritual Egypt, and under the bondage of the devil and our lusts, which is worse than Egyptian bondage. And the Israelites' temporal deliverance from Egypt was typical ot our spiritual deliverance from Satan's bondage: so that the argu- ment hath the same force with us as with the Jews Q. Why was the Israelites' deliverance from Egypt so mucn made use of as an argumentfor their obedience? A Because Ecrypt was fall of gross idolatry, a plague wuh which they were^in danger of being infected: and there tney groaned under cruel bondage; from which God delivered them in a most miraculous manner. Q. Why should it be reclconed so great a mercy to be deliv- ered from places overspread icith idolatry? A. Because idolatry is a damnable sin, and brings on great wrath; upon which account, the mercy of our ancestors deliver- ance from mystical Egypt (Rome's idolatry and bondage) should engage us to' thankful obedience to God's law, as well as the is- raelit'es' deliverance did their posterity. 148 OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. Q. Are not those who are redeemed by Christ from the bon- dage of Satan and their lusts, strongly obliged to keep his com' mands? A. Yes, Luke i. 74. Q. Is not Satan'' s slavery worse than any other? A. Yes; for other captives groan unJer their slavery, and long for deliverance, but Satan's slaves are content and easy; other ty- rants rule only over the bodies of their slaves, but Satan rules over the soul and all its faculties. Q. How may we know if we be redeemed by Christ from this bondage? A. It will be a good sign if the Redeemer be precious to us, particularly in his kingly office; and if we find the power of in- dwelling sin so broken ia us, th^t this bosom enemy doth not triumph over us. Quest. 45. Which is the first commandment P Jlns. The first commandment is, '^ Thou shalt have no other gods before me.'^ Quest. 46. what is reqviired in the first command- ment ? Ans, The first commandraentrequireth us to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God 3 and to worship and glorify him according- ly- Q. V^hy doth this and the rest of the commands still run in the singular number^ thou, and not you? A. Because God would have every man to notice the direc- tions thereof as particularly as if they were spoke to himself by name. Q. How is the first command said io require things of us, when it seems only to forbid? A. Because it is a rule for the right understanding of the com- mands. That, where a sin is forbidden, the contrary duty is com- manded; and, where a duty is commanded, the contrary sin is forbidden; and so v/e find the scripture explains the law. Matt. V. 21, 24. Eph. iv. 28. Jsa. Iviii. 13. Matt. xv. 4, 5, 6. Q. How many duties doth the first command chiefiy require? A. Four. 1. To know God. '2. To acknowledge God. — 8. To worship God, 4. To glorify God. OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. 151 Q . Can we be said to glorify God in the same sense that God is said to glorify us? A. No; for our glorifying God is only declarative, but God's glorifying us is effective; we only declare God to be glorious, but God makes us glorious. Q. How are we to declare God'^s glory? A, By making known his glorious excellencies and perfections, and honoring him both with our lij)s and lives. See more of this before on the first Quest, page 15, 16. Quest. 47. What is forbidden in the first com- mandmentP Jlns, The first commandment forbiddeth the deny- ing, or not worshipping and glorifying the true God, as Grod, and our God ; and the giving that worship and glory to any other, which is due to him alone, Q. What are the chief sins here forbidden? A. There are five mentioned in the answer; 1. Denying the true God. 2. Not worshipping him. 3. Not glorifying him. — 4. Givinghis worship to another. 5. Giving his glory to anoth- er. Q. Who are these that are guilty of the sin of denying the true God? A. 1. Atheists, who deny the being of a God. 2. Deists and Infidels, who deny the truth of the holy scriptures, and do not be- lieve what God saith in them . 3. Those who deny the true Dei- ty of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, or disown the doctrine of the Trinity; such as Arians, Socinians, Quakers, and others. 4. These who deny the providence of God in governing the world, and ascribe events to other things. Q. HoiD many sorts of Atheists are there? A. Three sorts; 1. Atheists in opinion. 2. Atheists in afTec- tion. 3. Atheists in conversation. Q. Who are these that are Atheists in opinion ? A. These who profess to believe that there is not a God. Some few have done so, and have been put to death for it. This truth of the existence of God having the light of nature and general consent of all nations to vouch for it, it is not easy to imagine how there can be a speculative Atheist, or one that hath got the impressions of God entirely blotted out, which are naturally en- graven upon man's heart. Q. Are there any such Atheists in hell? A. Atheism is a sin that cannot have place there, no devil is guilty of it, James ii. 19, 152 OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. Q. Is not Atheism a dreadful sin ? A. Yes; for it lends to open (he fjood-gates for all impiety and wickedness, and to destroy all order and government in the world: for thus a man might ciieat, steal, rob, murder, and do the vilest things, and yet not sin, nor have any thing to fear hereaf- ter. Q. Who arc these that are Aihcisis in ajfection? A. These who in tiieir liearts wish there were no God, as all wicked men secretly do, Psalm xiv. 1. Q. Why do wicked men wish there were no God? A. That so they might be freed from these restraints, which mar their sinful pleasure?, Q. Who are these that arc Atheists in conversation ? A, Practical Atheists, as these who live as if there were no God, Tit. i. 16. " They profess that they know God, but in works ^ they deny him." Q. Are there not many of these jpractical Atheists in the world ? A. Yes. Q. Who may hereclwned such? A. All these, l.'VVho neglect the worship of God. 2. Who live in hypocrisy. 3. Who indulge secret sins. 4. Who mock at the holy scriptures or holy persons. 5. Who never think on death or judgment. 6. Who set their hearts wholly upon the world, or upon sensual things. Q. What is the second sin mentioned in the answer? A. Not worshipping of God. Q. Who are tJicsc who are guilty of this sin of not worship- ping God ? A. These who do not think of God, do not esteem him, do not love him, do not believe him, do not honor him, do not fear him, do not humble themselves before him, do not attend God's ordi- nances, do not offer prayers or praises to God in the public assem- blies, nor in their families or closets. Q. What is the third sin forbidden in this command? A. Not glorifying of God. Q. Who are these that arc guilty of this sin? A. 1. These who neglect the knowledge of God, and live in ignorance of him. 2. These v/ho forget God, or hate the thoughts of him. 3. These who do not admire and praise him, or are un- thankful to him. 4. '['hese who desire the creatures, or delight in objects of sense more than God. 5. These who are profane and ungodly in their lives and conversation. Q. What is the fourth sin forbidden in this command? OF THE FIRST COIVIMANDJMElNT. 149 Q. Doth God expressly command us to study to know him ? A. Yes, 1 Chron. xxviii. 9. "And thou, Solomon ruy son, know Ihou the God of thy father." Q. Is it not highly dangerous to live ivithout the knowledge of God? A. Yes, Jer. x. 25. " Pour out thy fury upon the heathen that know tliee not." Q. Is not ignorance of God yet more dangerous to these who live in a land of light, and enjoy the means ofknoivledge? A. Yes, seeing they are without all excuse. Q. Is it siiffieient to know that there is a God? A. Noj we must also know what God is, and what are hu works. Q. What are these things toe must know of God? A. We should study to know God : ]. In his unity of essence. 2. In his Trinity of persons. 3. In his attributes and perfec- tions. 4. In his works of creation, of providence, and of re- demption. Q. What sort of knoivledge of God is it that we must seek af- ter? A. A literal knowledge of God is not sufficient; a comprehen- sive knowledge of God is unattainable- but an experimental, practical, soul-affecting, humbling, and transforming knowledge of God., is what we should seek after, and labour to attain. Q. Besides knowing God, are we also bound to acknowledge God? A. Yes, Dent. xxvL 17. " Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God." Q. What should we acknoirledge concerning God? A. We should acknowledge him to be the only living and true God, and that he is the only object of divine worship; we should acknowledge him to be the Creator and Governor of the world, and own our dependence upon him for all things; and we should acknowledge him as our Lawgiver and Judge, to whom we are accountable for all that we do. Q. Is itsup,cient to own and acknowledge God to be (Jie true God? A. No, unless also we take him and acknowledge him to be our God, and serve him accordingly. Q. What is imported in acknowledging God as our God? A. L It imports our renouncing all idols that would rival it with him. 2. Our making choice of God as our portion and chief good, and the God whom we will serve and please above all the world. 3. Our covenant dedication, surrendering, and engaging ourselves to be the Lord's. 4. Our owning of God, and N2 150 OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. of his truths and ways before the world, which is called a confes- sing or professing of him before men, Matt. x. 32. John xii. 42. Rom. X. 9. J John iv. 15, I Tim. ii. 10, and vi. 12. Q. What is the third duty required in this command? A. To worship God, Matt. iv. 10. *' Thou shall worship the Lord thy God, and him only shall tliou serve." Q. How is God to he worshipped by us? A. Both inwardly and outwardly. Q. When is it that we worship God inwardly t A, When we remember him, love him, highly esteem him, desire him, delight in him, honour and adore him, fear him, be- lieve hitn, trust and hope in him, Mai. iii. 16. Eccl. xii. 1. Deut. vi. 5. Psal.lxxi. 19. Mai. i. 6. Isa. xxvi. 4, 8. Psal. cxxx. 7, and xxxvii. 4. Q. How do we worship God outwardly? A. By offering up our prayers and praises to God, attending to his word, and partaking of the sacraments, Q. What is the fourth duty required in this command? A. To glorify God. Q. Is there any difference between worshipping and glorify- ing of God? A. Yes, in regard glorifying of God is of larger signification than worshipping of him, seeing it comprehends all obedience to his lav/s, and hath respect to all parts of our conversation. We are bound to glorify God, not only in our religious, but also in our civil and natural actions; whether we buy or sell, eat or drink, or whatsoever we do, we should do all to the glory of God, Psal. 1.23. 1 Cor. vi.20,and x, 31. Q. What is the import of the word accordingly in the answer? A. It imports that we should worship and glorify God in such a manner as to make it appear that we really know him, and own him both as the true God and as our God. Q^ Why is worshipping God and glorifying hi?n joined to- gether? A. To teich us, that we must not only worship God devout- ly, but we must also walk circumspectly, and live holy lives in the world. Q. IV hat if a man worship God, and yet live in sin? A' His prayers cannot be heard, but will be an abomination to the Lord, Psal. Ixvi. 18. Prov. xxviii. 9. Q. Who is the worshipper that will be accepted of God? A. The man that hath a tender walk, and makes conscience of his ways, John ix. 31. ''We know that God heareth not sin- ners; but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doth his will, him he heareth." OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. 153 A. Idolatry, or the giving that worship to another which is due to God alone. Q. How many kinds of idolatry are there? A. Two kinds, 1 . Idolatry that is outward and visible. 2. Idol- atry that is more secret and invisible, Q. Who are guilty of the idolatry that is outward and rm- hle? A. 1. The Pagans, who worship their idol-gods, their demons and deified heroes, the sun, the moon, the stars, the fire, several kinds of beasts, &lc. 2. The Papists, who worship other gods besides the true God: fi3r they deify several things both in heaven and earth, to which they pay religious worship and horn* Q. What are these other gods in heaven which the Papists do worship? A. They worship angels, the virgin Mary, and saints depart- ed. Q. What are these other gods on earth which they worship? A. They worship the Pope, the bread in the sacrament, the sign of the cross, the images and relics of saints. Q. How doth it appear that the Papists give religious hon- our and worship to these things? A. Both by their practice, and by their books: for they build churches, erect altars and institute holy days in honour of them; they burn incense, make and pay vows to them; bow their knees and pray to them; they seek blessings from them, and make them their hope and trust. As for instance, they adore the wood of the cross, saying, O crux ave. Spes, unica, ^'c. that is, O holy cross, our only hope and trust, increase to the godly their righ- teousness, and give unto sinners grace and remission of their sins. Q. But why may we not worship saints and angels? A. It is idolatry to worship creatures: for men to pray to them is to ascribe divine honors, and perfections to them, as omniscience and omnipotence: God forbids this, as a giving of his glory to another; and tells us, that the saints in heaven do not know our wants. For proof of which, see Matt. iv. 10. Acts x. 26, 26. Rev. xix. 10. Isa. xlii. 8, and Ixiii. 16. And if it be idolatry to worship saints in heaven, far more is it to worship the bones, teeth, or relics of saints on earth, as Papisis do; to avoid this, God buri- ed the body of Moses secretly, that none might worship it. Q. Is there not idolatry more secret and invisible, which oth- ers are guilty of besides Pagans and Papists? A. Yes; all carnal and unregenerate persons are guilty of it, by putting tlie creature in room of the Creator, loving it and de- 254 OF THE FIRST COMMANDMENT. pending on it more than God. For whatever tiling it be that halh most of our love, or of our trust, or of our fear and dread, or halh most of our thoughts, or of our time and service, that is really our {7od; seeing it is put in God's room, and hath the honor and glo- ry which is only due to him. Q. What arc these idols which men commonly set up in God^s room ? A. 1. Self is the great idol which men generally adore, by seeking themselves in all they do; and this idol appears in many different shapes, as self profit, self-wisdom, self-righteousness, self ability, self-ease, self-credit, and applause. 2. The wcrld is the great clay idol which worldly men adore; hence covetous men are called idolaters, and covetousness idolatry. 3. 'Vhehcl' ly is the god of drunkards and gluttons, Phil. iii. 19. 4. Child- rendind relationsare the idols of many. 5. 6rVca^7/'ze;i or superiors ere pat in the room of God, when we trust in the arm of flesh, or make them lords of our faith and conscience. 6. The devil is called the god of this world, 2 Cor. iv. 4. So that we may hence see how sadly idolatry abounds even among professed Protestants, who have renounced the Romish idolatry. Q. In what respect is the devil called the god of this ii'orld? A. Because he is put in the room of the true God by liie most pan of the world. For, in the first place, we read and hear of many of the Indians who directly worship him, and he appears to them in a bodily shape: besides, it is at his instigation that the infidel would run into all manner of wickedness. Again, how much is he adored, honored and served among professed Chris- tians! by witches, who enter into compact with the devil, and give up themselves to him; by these who consult with witches- and charmers, and these who use his spells and charms; by these who in their common discourse pray to the devil, bidding him take them, or their neighbours; and by these who hearken to the devil's temptations more than God's counsels. Q. What is the fifth sin forbidden in the first command? A. The giving of the glory, which is due to God, to anoth- •er. Q. Wh are the guilty of this sin ? A. Not only those who give divine worship to creatures, as above; but also those who ascribe events, not to God's providence, but to luck or chance, or to secondary causes only ; and those who ascribe the praise of any good thing they receive, and their success in any business, to themselves and their own industry, to crea- tures, or to fortune; and likewise those who have men's persons in too great admiration, they are chargeable with this sin of giv- ing God's glory to others, 1 Sam. vi. 9. Deut. viii. 17. Dan. iv. 30. Hab. i. 16. Actsxii. 22,23. Jude 16. OF THE SECOND COMMANDMENT. U5 Quest. 48. what are ice specially taught hy these words [before me] in the first commandment P •.ins. These words [before me] in the first com- luandment, teach us, that God, who seeth all thiugs, taketh notice of, and is much displeased with the sin of having any other God. Q. What is the argument in this command to dissuade or res' train u^from the sin of idolatry? A. The consideration of God's omniscience, that the sin is committed before him, or in his sight, who exceedingly hates and abhors it. Q. How doth it appear that God doth see all things? A. In regard that he is present in all places, and infinite in knowledge, Psai. cxxxix. 7, 8, &c. Jer. xxiii. 24. Psal. cxlvii. 5, Q. What are these things which God doth see? A. He seeth all past things, all present things, ?i\\ future things, and all possible things: he sees all his creatures, all their thoughts, all their words, and all their actions. Q. Doth God take special notice of the sin of idolatry above other sins ? A. Yes. Q. How doth that appear? A. By the many tokens of displeasure which God hath eviden- ced against it, both in threatening and punishing men for it, Deut. xxix . 24, 25, &.C. Q. Why is God so much displeased with the sin of idola- try? A Because God, who is jealous of bis own glory, cannot but take it as a great indignity to see another put in his room, and set upon his throne, and that in his very sight and presence. Q. Is not the attribute of God^s omniscience much affronted hy the world? A. Yes; namely, by their idolatry, hypocrisy, and secret wick- edness. Q, Ought not God'^s omniscience to be a powerful check to all sin? A. Yes. Quest. 49. Which is the second commandment P Jlns, The second commandment is, Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness 156 OF THE SECOND COMMANDMENT. of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth : Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me ; and shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. Quest. 50. What is required in the second com- mandment? Jins, The second commandment requireth the re- ceiving, observing, and keeping pure and entire, all such religious worship and ordinances as God hath appointed in his word. Q. Is the worship required, and idolatry forhidden^ in the second commandment, the same with that in the first command- ment ? A. No; for thej^r^^ command directs us as to the right object of worship; but tlie second command directs us as to the right way and means of worship; the first forbids the worshippin^r of any false god; ihe second forbids the worshipping of the trueGcd in a false way, or by any means but what he himself appoints. Q. Hath God appointed all that religious worship, and all these means and ordinances, in and hy which only he will be ser- ved and worshipped ? A, Yes. Q. Where do ice find these? A. In his word. Q, What arc these ordinances and means of divine worship appointed usl A. 1st, There is prayer in public, in private, and secret, Luke i. 10. Jer. X. 25. Matt. vi. 6. — 2dly, There is thanksgiving and singing of psalms, Eph. v. 20. Isa. Hi. 8. James v. 13. — 3dly, There is the reading, preaching, and hearing of the word, Acts v. 21. 2Tim. iv. 2. Acts x. 33.— 4thly, The administration and partaking of the sacraments of baptism and the Lord's supper, Matt, xxviii. 19. 1 Cor. xi. 23, 24, &c.— 5thly, There is fasting, Luke V. 35. — 6thly, Swearing by the name of the Lord when lawfully called, Deut. vi. 13. — 7thly, Vowing to the Lord, Psal. Ixxvi. 11.— 8thly, Instructing of children and servants, Gen. x. 18, &c. OF THE SECOND COMMANDxMENT. 167 Q. What doth God require of us concerning all these ordinan' CCS? A. That we should receive them, observe th6m, and keep them pure and entire. Q. What is it to receive and observe them? A. It is to approve of them, attend upon them, and continue steadfastly in the practice of them. Q. What is it to keep these ordinances pure and entire? A. Jt is to use our best endeavours to preserve them free from all corruption or mixture of human inventions j and to keep them so as nothing be added to them, or taken away from them. Quest. 51. What is forbidden in the second com- mandment P Ans, The second commandment forbiddetli the worshipping of God by images, or any other way not appointed in his word. Q. What is the chief sin forbidden in this command? A. Idolatry, or the worshipping of the true God by images. Q. What do you mean by an image? A. The picture, shape, or likeness of any creature in heaven, on earth, or in the sea, Q. When is a person guilty of worshipping God by ima- ges? A. 1st. When he frames or takes any material picture or sim- ilitude, and sets it before him in worship; as the Papists do, who paint God the Father under the likeness of an old man; and Je- sus Christ in the likeness of a young man, or of a lamb; and the Holy Ghost by the figure of a dove; which is plainly to " change the glory of God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds and four-footed beasts," which the apostle condemn?, Rom. i. 23. 2dly, A person is guilty of it, when he hath any carnal imagination or representation of God in his mind while worshipping him, as if he was like to a man or any creature. Q. May not an image or picture, to look upon in time of pray- er, be some help to us in devotion, as Papists say ? A. No; instead of a help, it is a great hinderance. '^^ Q. How is it a hinderance ? A. In regard it promotes carnal and low thoughts of God, who is a glorious Spirit, and infinitely exalted above ali things visible or earthly. It is as great a dishonour and disparagement to the Majesty of God to represent him by the dead image of a O 158 OF THE SECOxND COMMANDMENT. creature, as it would be to represent a king by the picture of a frog. Q. But may we not have svch images of God or of the per- sons of the Trinity by us, if we donoticorship them? A. No; for it is an abomination which God expressly forbids, Deut. iv. 15, 16. " Take ye good heed to yourselves (for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the Lord spake to you in Iloreb out of the midst of the fire,) lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven imnge, the similitude of any figure," &,c. And further, it is impossible to frame an image of him that is in- finite, spiritual, and invisible; and therefore he frequently asks the question, as in Isa. xl. 18, 25, and xlvi. 5. To whom will ye liken God? Surely no shape of any creature, no dead image, can be a fit representation of the living God. Q. May we not have a picture of Jesus Christy who is truly a man? A. No; because, 1. His divine nature, which makes him to be Christ, cannot be pictured at all. 2. He left no picture of his body when he left the earth, nor any account of his features, as it were on purpose to discourage any to draw his picture. 3. His body, as now glorified, cannot be represented by any artist whatsoever; so that the pictures now made of him must be great- ly debasing of his glorious person. 4. If any such picture be designed 1o excite devotion, it is a breach of this command, which forbids all worshipping of God by images, Q. Why do Papists leave the second command out of their Catechisms and public offices ? A. Because it so expressly condemns their images, crucifixes and idolatrous practices. Q. IVill it free them from idolatry, to say they only worship God, or Christ, before or by them, but not the images them- selves ? A. No; for the command forbids even bowing or kneeling be- fore them. And, if this shift could excuse the Papists, it had also excused the Israelites in worshipping the golden calf; for they had it to say that they intended to worship Jehovah before the calf, Exod. xxxii. 4, 5. ^in Q. Is there any other sin forbidden in the second command, berides idolatry, or the worshipping of God by images? A. Yes; namely, the sin of superstition or will-worship. Q. What do you mean by that? A. Men's presuming to worship God by means of their own tlevising, adding human inventions to God's institutions, or con- triving other ways to serve and worship God than what he hath appointed or warranted in his word. OF THE SECOND COMMANDMENT. 169 Q. IVho are guilty of this sin? A. All these who add new sacraments to the two of Christ's institution, or these who add the sign of the cross to baptism, the posture of kneeling to the Lord's supper, the keeping of holy-days to the Lord's day, playing with organs to singing with the voice, reading of a book to prayer; or they who erect altars, pictures or crosses in places of worship, and bow unto them, or bow to the east, and at the name of Jesus, or the like. All these are super- stitious inventions in God's worship, and human additions to God's institutions, without any warrant in his word, and there- fore against the second command. Q. Why may not wise^ holy and learned men add some such things for beautifying the u'orship of God? A. 1st. Because an infinitely holy and wise God, who hath unquestionable right to appoint the means and manner of his own worship, hath expressly forbidden men to add any thing to the directions he hath given concerning the same, Deut. xii. 30, 31,32. 2dly. He sharply censures all such additions, by cal- ling them will-worship, and vain- worship, and saying, they had only a shew or pretence of wisdom in them, Col. ii. 23. Matt. xv. 9. Nay, he looks upon it as a presumptuous attempt to rival it with him, for men to add their own inventions to his institutions, and calls it a setting of their thresholds by his threshold, and their posts by his posts, Ezek. xliii. 8, and even saith it is a go- ing a-whoring with their inventions, Psal. cvi. 39. Q . JVhy would God censure things ichich are so rcell designed for his glory, and for beautifying his worship? A. Ist. Because he accounts it great ])ride and presumiption in men to take upon them to mend the ordinances of God, as if they were wiser than he. 2dly. Instead of beautifying his wor- ship thereby, they rather disfigure it; for God's worship is most beautiful in its own native simplicity and lustre ; for to paint glass doth darken its light, to gild a diamond mars its sparkling rays. 3dly. It is only the presence and blessing of God that can make ordinances profitable to us; but God hath no where promised his blessing to men's inventions, but exclusively to his own institu- tions. Matt, xxviii. 20. Q. Had not the Jews several significant ceremonies in worship under the lawt A. Yes; but these were appointed by God's authority, as they were abolished again by it at Christ's coming, and a plain simple way of worship instituted under the gospel. And it is no wise likely that God would remove the ceremonies of his own institu- tion, merely to make way for men inventing others in their room. 160 OF 1'HE SECOND COMMANDMENT. Q. May not the church appoint some rites or ceremonies for sake of decency and order, by virtue of that command, 1 Cor. xiv, 40. A. That text doth not warrant the church to add new parts to the worship of God, as significant ceremonies would be, but only to keep and observe the ordinances as God has delivered thena to us, with decency and order; and to take cave that there be no iindecencyor disorder in the worship of God, namely, as to the circumstances of time and place and the like, which the com- mand of God appointing the worship itself dolh virtually include, seeing without such circumstances it .cannot be performed. Q. Is there any other sin forbidden by the second command- ment ? A. Yes; such as the countenancing, approving, or promoting of any false religion or superstitious worship: the neglecting, contemning, hindering or opposing of the true worship of God, or any of liis ordinances; the reproaching or persecuting these who worship God according to his word. Quest. 52. What are the reasons annexed to the second commandment ? Jins, The reasons annexed to the second com- mandment are^ God's sovereignty over us, his pro- priety in us, and the zeal he hath to his own wor- ship. O. What mean you by a reason annexed to a command? A. An argument joined to it, to enforce the keeping of it. Q. How many such reasons are annexed to this command? A. Three: 1. God's sovereignty over us. 2. God's propri- ety in us. 3. God's zeal for his own worship. Q. What mean you by God^s sovereignty over us? A. His absolute power and authority over us, so that he may do with us as he pleaseth, Q. In what words of the command is this reason contain- ed? A. In these, / the Lord. Q. What do these words import? A. That he is the sovereign Lord over us, and lias a right to make what laws he pleases about his own worship; and that we, as God's subjects, are bound to observe these laws, and to wor- ship him no other way. Q. In ichat words is the second reason contained? A. In these words, Thy God, 1 the Lord thy God. OF THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. Ibl Q. TPhat do these icords import? A. That God hath a propriety or special interest in us; we be- long to him by creation, redemption, or profession; and therefore we ought to keep close to our God and his institutions, and be- ware of idolatry and superstition in worship, which tend to es- trange the heart from God, Psal. cvi. 19, 21. Q. In what words of the command is the tliird reason con^- tained? A.. In these, I am a jealous God. Q. What do these words import ? A. That God hath a great jealousy, zeal, or tender concern for his own worship, and is highly displeased with those who cor- rupt, by bringing men's inventions into it, Exod. xxxiv. 14. — Psalm cvi. 29. Q. Wherein doth God sJiew his zeal and jealousy for his own worship 1 A. In threatening to punish them as haters of God, who break this command, to the third and fourth generation; and in shew- ing mercy to thousands of them that love him, and keep his law. Q. Is it just loith God to punish children for the sins of their parents ? A. Yes, if the children go on in their parents' sins; but, if they forsake them, God will not punish them for them, Ezeko xviii. 14, 17. Q. Doth God esteem any persons as lovers of him, hut such, as keep his commandments? A. No, Johnxiv.21. Q. Doth not all these reasons oblige us to the greatest caiiilou that ice do not alter nor add to divine ordinances and institutions of loorship? A. Yes. Q. Have these who suffer for non conformity to such additions^ sufficient warrant for their sufferings? A. Yes; as is evident from Deut. xii. 32, compared with Deut, iv. 2. "Ye shall uot add unto the word which 1 cotnaiand you." Qaest. 53. Wliieli is the third commandment? Jins. The third com.naDilraent is, Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord tliy God in vain : For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. O 2 162 OF THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. Quest. 54. what is required in the third command- ment P ^Ins, The third commandment requireth the holy and reverend use of God's names, titles, attributes, ordinances, word, and vvorlcs. Q. In what manner must we use Gocfs name? A. In a holy and reverend manner; that is, with a liumble and awful regard to God's infinite greatness and excellencies. Q. What is ?neant by the name of God here? A. Any thing that is commonly ascribed to God, and by which God makes himyelf known to us, as a man is known to us by his rame. Q. What are these things whereby God makes himself hiown to us? A. They are six, to wit. God's names, his titles, his attributes, his ordinances, his word, and his works. Q. What are the names given to him^ which we must reverently use? A. They are such as Jehovah, Lord, God, Jah, I am, the Fath- er, the Son, Je?us Christ, the Holy Ghost, the Spirit, &c. Q. What are the titles of God, which we must use tcith rever- ence? A. They are his usual designations taken from some of his peculiar excellencies, such as, the Lord of Hosts, King of kings, Lord of lords. Father of liglits. Holy One of Israel, Creator of the ends of the earth, preserver of men, and ihe like. Q. W'hat are the attributes of God, ichich we should use rev- erently ? A, The essential perfections, whereby his nature is described to us, and he is distinguished from all his creatures; such as om- nipotence, omnipresence, eternity, immutability, infinite wisdom, infinite holiness, goodness, faithfulness, mercy, die. Q. Why are these called God's atiributes ? A. Because God doth claim them to himself, exclusive of all others. Q. What are the ordinances of God, which we must use rever- ently? A. The sacraments, prayer, praise, preaching, oaths, vows, lots, &-C. Q . What is meant by God''s word in the answer ? A. Not his essential word, but his written word, or the Bi- ble. Q. What is meant by God''s works? OF THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 163 A. The works of creation, of providence, and of redemp- tion. Q. When may it be said that the names^ titles, and attributes of God are used by vs in a holy and reverend manner? A. When we entertain awful, admiring, and loving thoughts of them in our hearts, and mention them with gravity, respect, and tenderness with our lips. Q. When do we make use of God''s ordinances in a holy and reverend manner ? A. When we make conscience of attending upon them, seek to have a humble reverential frame of heart in all our approaches to God, and earnestly desire communion with God in every ordinance of his. Q. When do we use God''s word in a holy and reverend way? A. When we read it vvith seriousness, attend to the Majesty of God as speaking therein to us, and endeavor to yield present obedience to his holy will when revealed to us. Q, When do ive use God''s works in a holy and reverend way ? A. When we contemplate God's glory in his works of creation, and have an awful regard to his dispensations of providence, submitting patiently to his corrections for sin, and praising him for all his mercies, and especially for Jesus Christ our Sa- viour. Quest. 55. What is forbidden in the third com* mandmentP Jins, The third commandment forbiddeth all pro- fanins; or abusing of any thing whereby God maketh himself known. Q. When do we take God''s name in vain ? A. When we use it irreverently, superstitiously, or profane- ly; or when we abuse any thing whereby he makes himself known to us, such as his names, titles, attributes, ordinances, &lc. Q. How is it that people are guilty ofprofaning or abusing of God''s names, titles, or attributes? A. Many ways; as, I. By swearing falsely when called to it before a judge. 2. By cursing or swearing profanely in common discourse. 3. By blasphemy, or speaking reproachfully of God. 4. By using the name of God in charms. 5. By offering prayers or praises to God with formal and careless minds. 6. By using God"'s name irreverently in common discourse, crying without any awe, O Lord, O God, God help me, bless me, or the like, — 164 OF THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 7. By repeating the oatlis of others without concern for them. — 8. By rash appeals to God, &:c. Q. Is it lawful to swear hy the name of God when called to it hy authority? A. Yes, if what we swear be right and true, and if we have an awful sense of God upon our hearts when we do it, Deut. vi. 13. Heb. vi. 16. Q. Is it lauful for a man to swear hy his soul, conscience, faith, or the like? A. No; for tiiese being creatures, to swear by them is idolatry, or a putting of them in God's room, by giving them the worship and attributes which belong to him. Q. What is the evil or sin ofprofane swea.ring and cursing? A. 1st, It is against God"'s command both here and in other texts, as Matt. v. 34, Rom. xii. 1 4. 2dly, It is a rash way of ap- pealing to the great Judge of heaven upon every trifling occasion, Vv^hich God doth look on as a horrid batfling of his name. 3dly, It is a sad evidence of a graceless and profane lieart; hence tlie Lord makes it a distinguishing character of the wicked and the •righteous, Eccl. ix. 2. " He that sweareth, and he that feareth an oath.'*' Q. Doth God look upon profane swearers as his enemies? A. Yes, as in Psal. xxxix. 20. " Thine enemies take thy name in vain." Q. What is the danger ofprofane or false sxuearing ? A. The Lord V,' ill deal with such swearers as his enemies, by sending his curse into their houses, Zech. v. 3, 4, and pursuing them witii his judgments both here and hereafter; for with an aw- ful voice from Mount Sinai halh he declared, *' The Lord will not hold him guiltless that takelh his name in vain." Q. When are people guilty of profaning or abusing God'^s ordinances ? A. 1. When they attend them hypocritically, or with dead and wandering hearts. 2. When they behave irreverently or indecently, in the time of them, by talking, laughing, or sleep- ing. Q. May lots be used in plays and games ^ as cards or dice? A. No; for lots being an appeal to God, for deciding things •which cannot otherwise be determined, ought to be gone about widi reverence, Prov. xvi. 33. and xviii. 1 9. Acts i. 26. Q. Hoic do men profane or abuse God''s nwrd? A. By profane jesting upon it, or by perverting it to support .error or sinful practises. Q, How do men profane or abuse God''s works? A. By despising God's workmanship, by using his creatures ia OF THE THIRD COMMANDMENT. 166 excess to the pampering of iheir liisis, by impatience under af* flictions, and unthankfulness for mercies. Quest. 56. What is the reason annexed to the third commandment ? Ans, The reason annexed to the tliird command- ment is, That however the breakers of this command- ment may escape punishment from men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape bis righteous judgment. Q. What is the argument for evforcing this cofnman dment? A. It is contained in that dreadful threatening, ^' For the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.*' Q. What is the import of that threatening? A. It imports, that, though men should suffer swearers and such pro1^.ne persons to pass, God will not let them escape with- out punishment, if they do not repent. Q. How come the hreaJicrs of this commandment to pass without punishment from men? A. Partly because human laws cannot extend to all profana- tions of God's name, and partly because many of these who should execute the laws against the profaners of God's name, are either guilty of the same or like sins themselves, or they are little con- cerned for God's glory. Q. Though men let them pass, will God let them go unpun- ished ? A. No; for though he do not always punish them in this life with remarkable strokes, yet he will do it in his own time; for he says, He will not hold them guiltless. Q. will he keep an exact account of the sins of the breakers of this commandment? A. Yes; for he is much concerned for the glory of his name. Q. When is it that God doth punish the breakers of this com' mand? A. Sometimes he inflicts judgments upon them in this life, according to Deut. xxviii. 58, 59. Zech. v. 3, 4. and these plagues are sometimes outward, and sometimes inward. But, however they may escape temporal judgments, there are eternal judgments abiding them, which they cannot escape. Rom. ii. 3,4,6, 6. Q. Is it not great folly to venture to break God''s law because 166 OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. of his patience in forbearing ia execute his Judgements presently against dnncrs ? A. Yes. Quest. 57. Which is the fourth commandment ? Jins. Tlje fourth commandment is, Keraember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor and do all thy work : But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God : In it thou shalt not do any work, tliou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man servant, nor thy maid servant, nor thy cattle, nortlie stranger that is within thy gates. — For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day : Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it. Quest. 58. What is required in the fourth com- mandment P Jlns. The fourth commandment requireth the kee- ping holy to God such set times as he hath appointed in his word, expressly one whole day in seven, to be a holy Sabbath to himself. Q. Wliat mean you hy a sabbath day? A. A day of holy rest, wherein men are to cease from worldly business, to attend upon the worship of God. Q. Hate often is this day for the sabbath to recur? A. It is to be every seventh day, or still one day after six day's labour. Q. Is this fourth commandment cere?nonial and temporary , binding only upon the Jews before Chrisfs coming? A. No J it is a command moral and perpetual, binding upon all men, Jews and Gentiles, to the end of the world. Q. How do you prove the morality and perpetuity of this com- mand ? A. 1. From its bemg first appointed in paradise. 2. From its being written by the finger of God upon stone, and put into the ark with the other nine commands, which was not done with any ceremonial precept. 3. The reasons and arguments made use of to enforce this command are moral and perpetual. 4. The OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 167 Gentiles and strangers, who were not under the ceremonial law, were bound to keep the Sabbath as well as the Jews, Isa. liv. 4, 6. b. Both the Old Testament prophets, and Jesus Christ, do speak of the keeping of the sabbath as a duty in force under New Testament times, when the ceremonial law was to be abol- ished, Isa. Ivi- 1, 2. Matt. xxiv. 20. 6. The consciences of men do still challenge them most severely for breaking of this command; and God doth still pursue the breakers of it with his judgments. Q. Whether is the fourth command authorized hy the light of nature and sound reason^ as the other nine are, or only hy ex- press revelation and a positive law? A. It is authorized by both: for the light of nature doth re- quire that a due part of our time be allotted for the public wor- ship of God, which should frequently recur; and that this time should be the same over all, that so one man's business may not interfere with another man's devotions. Now, the Author of na- ture, who best knows what portion of time is most suitable to the exigencies both of our bodies and souls, our present and future state, hath by express revelation wisely determined it to be the seventh part of our time. Q. Doth not God shew special regard to this command, hy putting several marks of honour and respect upon it above the rest? A. Yes; for, 1. As it is placed in the first table, so it is lar- ger, and enforced with more arguments than any of the rest. 2. It is delivered both positively and negatively (which no other of the ten is) for it is not only said, Keep holy the Sabbath, but al- so, In it thou shalt do no manner of work. 3. It hath a solemn memento prefixed to it, which the rest have not. Remember to keep holy the Sabbath; q. d. See that ye remember this command^ forget what ye will, forget not this. 4. It is placed in the midst of the decalogue, as the heart in the body, for enlivening the sev- eral parts of it; it is set in the close of the first table, and immedi- ately before the second, to shew that the keeping of both tables doth greatly depend upon the observing of this command. Q. For what special ends hath God appointed a Sabbath to ihe world? A. 1. For his own glory, and for the conversion of sinners to himself, by the preaching of the word on that day. 2. For pro- moting spirituality and heavenly-mindedness in us. He well knew that carnal things would be apt to dull our affections, and make us forget God and heaven, and therefore he thought fit io recal us every week from sensual objects to mind divine things, by enjoining us to keep the sabbath, which is a lively emblem of 168 OF THE FOURTH COMMAxNDMENT, heaven, where the saints continually adore, praise and enjoy com- munion with God, without any mixture of worldly business. Q. How much of the day appointed for the sabbath is to be kept holy to the Lord? A. One whole day in seven; a whole natural day, consisting of twenty-four hours, commencing from midnight to midnight, ought to be dedicated unto the Lord, seeing he claims a seventh part of our time. It is true, time for eating and sleeping must be allow- ed upon the sabbath as well as on other days, being works of ne- cessity, seeing without these wc cannot perform the duties of the sabbath. Q. Is it not sinful for men to encroach upon this day for their own work? A. Yes; as it was sinful in Ananias and Sapphira to halve their dedicated goods, and give but a part to the Lord; so it is in us to halve it with God in respect of his holy day. Q. Should not every day be a sabbath to a christian? A. Though christians should serve God every day, yet they cannot make every day a sabbath for the public worship of God j because God calls us to other duties relating to secular affairs, which are inconsistent with the work of the sabbath. And though we are bound to be holy and religious at all times, yet we are enjoined to express our religion in outward acts of worship more at some times than others. Q. To whom is the fourth command^ and the charge of keep' ing the sabbath holy, more especially directed? A. To masters of families and other superiors, as the command itself bears, under which surely magistrates are included ; for these words, within thy gates, may be understood of the magistrates* dominions, and particularly of city-gates, and these who dwell within them, Neh. xiii. 15, 19. Jer. xvii. 24, 25, &lc. Q. Why is the command more especially directed to them? A. Because God would have them not only to keep it them- selves, but to oversee the keeping of it by all that are under their authority, as Nehemiah did, Neh. xiii. 15, 16, &lc. Q. J^hy doth the Lord prefx the word remember to this cow^ mand ? A. 1. To testify his special regard unto it, as being a fence to the other commands, and a help to the keeping of them all. 2. Because he foresaw that Satan and his instruments would seek to extinguish the memory of the sabbath, if they could; and men of themselves would be ready to forget the duties of it, seeing na- ture's light doth not enforce them so strongly as some others. 3. Because he would have us much to think upon the works of crea- tion and redemption, the compend of all religion, which this cora« OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 169 mand brings to our view. 4. Because he would have us to re- member the sabbath before it comes; so as to prepare ourselves for the keeping of it when it doth come. Q. What reason is there for prepariiig for the sahhath he- forehand? A. 1. Because we are naturally carnal and unfit for spiritual work; and, being involved in worldly business through the weekj some previous care is needful to abstract our thoughts from earthly things, in order to fit us for sabbath employ- ments and enjoyments. 2. Because God calls us to make a near and solemn approach to him, who is infinitely holy, in the ordinances of the sabbath; and this requires preparation, according to the Psalmist's example. Psalm xxvi. 6. " I will wash mine hands in innocency: so will I compass thine altar, O Lord." 3. It was the practice of God's ancient people to prepare for the sabbath upon the foregoing day, which therefore was called the day of preparation, Luke xxiii. 54. Q. What ought we to do hy way of •preparation for the sabbath before it comes? A. I. Let us remember ihe great end and design of the sabbath, so as to instruct these committed to our charge about it; and to break off from worldly business, so as we may have time to think of the work of the approaching day; and to get the guilt of the by- gone day removed, that we may have a reconciled God to meet with upon his own day. 2. Let us order all our worldly affairs before- hand with such prudence and foresight, that the business of the sabbath may not be interrupted thereby. Q. Hath God appointed any other set ti?nes to he hept holy to the Lord, besides the sabbath 1 A. None but the Jewish festivals or ceremonial sabbaths, which being only shadows of things to come, they expired with Christ's coming; but the command for the weekly sabbath being moral, it continues still in force, Col. ii. 16, 17. Gal. iv. 9, 10, U. 1 Cor. xvi. 1. 2. Q. Are we bound to heep the holy -days obsem'^ed by others^ such as days for Christ'^s birth, passion and ascension; days ded- icated to angels, as Michaelmas; to the virgin Mary, as Can- dlemas; besides many others dedicated to the apostles and other saints? A. Though it be pretended that these days serve to promote piety and devotion, yet we have no warrant from God to observe any of them; nay, it appears to be unlawful to do it: for 1st, God doth quarrel men for using any device of their own for promoting his service or worship, without having his command or warrant for it, as in Deut. xii. 32. Isa. i, 12. Jer. vii. 30. 2dly, the apostle P 170 OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. Paul doth expressly condemn the Galatians for observing such ho* ly days, Gal. iv. 10, 11. 3dly, It is a disparaging of the Lord's day which God hath appointed, and an usurping ofhis legislative power, for men to set days of their appointing on a level with his day, as the institutors do, by hindering people to labor thereupon. 4thly, It is an idolatrous practice to consecrate days to the honor of saints and angels, for com men^ora ting their acts, and publish- ing their praise; such honor and worship being due to God alone. Q. If ere not these days appointed by the ancient church, and authorized by great and holy men? A. It was will-worship in them, seeing they had no power to institute holy-days: for, 1st, Under the law, when ceremonies and festivals were in use, the church appointed none of them, but God himself. 2dly, We read nothing of the apostles appointing or observing such holy-days; not a word of their consecrating a day for Christ's birth, his passion, or ascension; nor a day to Ste- phen the proto-martyr, nor to James, whom Herod killed with the sword. VVe read of the apostles observing the Lord's day, and keeping it holy, but not of any other. 3dly. These other days are left unrecorded, and uncertain, and so are concealed like the bo- dy of Moses, that men might not be tempted to abuse them to su- perstition. 4thly. These days have not the divine blessing upon them; for they are the occasions of much looseness and immoral- ity. 5thly. Though the observing of these days had been indif- ferent or lawful at first, yet the defiling of them with superstition and intemperance should make all forbear them. Q. May not the church appoint days for fasting and thanks- giving ? A. Yes, if there be just occasion for them; and the church is warranted so to do, both by scripture precept and examples, Joel i. 14. and ii, 15. Ezra viii. 21. Neh. xii. 27, &C. Dan. ix. 3. — • And that such days are to be continued in gospel times, is plain from Zech. xii. 11, 12, &-c. Matt. ix. 15. Acts xiii, 2, 3. Acts xiv. 23. 1 Cor. viii. 5. 2 Cor. xi. 27. Moreover, it is God Mfho by his providence doth call us to fasting or thanksgiving; the church only doth name the days convenient for these purposes. Quest 59. Which day of the seven hath God ap- pointed to be the weeJdy Sabbath ? Ans, From the beginning of the world to the res- urrection of Christ, God appointed the seventh day of the week to be the weekly Sabbath, and the first day of the week, ever since, to continue to the end of the world, which is the Christian Sabbath, OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 171 Q, Was the sahbatk ever changed from one day of the week to another? A. Yes, it was changed from the last day of the week to the first. Q. How long was the seventh or last day of the week observed f^r the sabbath^ A. From the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ, which was about four thousand vears. Q. If the fowth command be morale how could Vie day ap- pointed in it for the sabbath be ever -altered? A. The precise day of the week is an alterable circumstance, and separable from the essence of the fourth command, and the changing of it makes no more against the morality of the fourth commtind, than the change of the means of worship under the gospel makes against the morality of the second com- mand . Q. How doth ii appear that the precise day of the week is sep- arable from the substance of the command? A. Because neither the first part of the command which ia the mandatory, nor the last part of it which is the benedictory, do mention the seventh day of the week: for the one saith, Re- member the sabbath day to keep it holy; and the other, Where- fore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed ii. He saith not. Remember the seventh day, nor that he blessed thesev- enth day, but only the sabbath; to teach us, that the seventh day m order from the creation is not of the essence of the command, but only a seventh day in number^ and that the seventh in order might be altered, without infringing tlie morality of the com- mand. Q. Wherefore did God at first appoint ike seventh in order from the creation for the sabbath? A. Because it was the day of God's rest from his works of cre- ation; and therefore God would have men to rest from their works on this day, and to remember his works. Q. When did God institute the sabbath at first? A. Immediately after the creation of the world, when Adara was in paradise. Gen. ii. 3. Q. Whal need had Adam of a sabbath^ while in that sinless place and state? A. Because Adam, though sinless, was but a finite creature, and his ordinary employment of dressing the garden would be some interruption to the solemn worship of God; wherefore God thought fit to appoint him a day in seven, wherein he might have uninterrupted freedom for it. Q. By what authority was the day for the sabbath changed? 172 OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. A. By the same authority which instituted the sabbath at first, even Christ's who is true God, and Lord of the sabbath: for whether Christ did it immediately by himself, or directed his apos- tles to do it, it is all one. But it is evident that the apostles both observed the first day of the week, and gave directions about it, which they would not have done without instructions from their Lord, Q. What was the necessity of a new day for the sdbhath f A. \. To manifest the greatness and glory of Christ, and his headship over the church. 2. He would bury the seventh day sabbath, to shew that therewith he was to abrogate and bury the Levitical worship and ceremonies which were practised on that day. Q, Why was the change made to the first day of the week? A, Because on this day the Lord did rest from his work of redemption, which was greater than that of creation. When God gave the ten commands, creation was his greatest work; but now, he having wrought a greater, it was fit the one should cede to the other. The amazing work of redemption, wherein God had won- derfully displayed his glorious perfections, being now finished, it was necessary that the day of God's resting from it, should be kept in everlasting remembrance. Of all the days the first day of the week was the most honourable to our Redeemer, and the most joyful to the redeemed; for on this day Christ was born from the dead, and declared to be the Son of God with power; this day our glorious Surety was discharged of all our debt, was liberated from prison, and triumphed over all his and our ene- mies. Q. Have we any express command for keeping the sabbath on this day ? A. No, though yet we have good warrant from scripture for doing it. The fourth command expressly obligeth as to observe one day of seven as a sabbath; and the example of Christ and his apostles in keeping the first day of the week, being universally known to the whole church, was sufficient to enter them upon the uniform observation of it; and accordingly it hath been the uninterrupted practice of all the churches of Christ through the world, since the apostles' days, to keep the first day of the week as the Christian sabbath. Q. What grounds have ice from scripture for keeping the first day of the week? A. Ist. We are told this was Christ's resurrection day. 2dly, We have Christ's own example in meeting frequently with his disciples on this day for religious work; on this day he met with his two disciples going to Emmaus, and opened the scriptures OF THE FOURTH COMMANDxMENT. 173 to them ; on this day he came to the eleven, shewed them his hands and feet, and opened their understandings; on this day he came and blessed them, and gave them the Holy Ghost; on this day he met with them and graciously convinced Thomas; as we may see in Luke xxiv. 15, 27, 36, 40, 45. John xx. 19, 22, 26, 27. 3dly, Upon this day, being Pentecost, God sent down that extraordina- ry elfusion of the Holy Ghost upon the apostles and brethren being met together. Acts ii. I, &c. 4thly, Upon this day the disciples usually met for divine worship, for preaching and hearing the word, and celebrating the Lord's supper, Acts xx. 7. Slhly, Upon this first day of the week the apostles ordered their collec- tions to be made for the poor, because of their public assemblies on it, 1 Cor. xvi. 1, 2. 6thly, As Christ hath put his name upon llie sacrament of the supper, calling it the Lord's supper, because it derives its institution from him; so upon the same account he hath put his name upon the first day of the week, calling it the Lord's day. Rev. i. 10. Q. Doth the fourth command transfer all the honour and dig- nity of the seventh day sabbath upon the first day of the week? A. Yes; because God on this day rested from a far greater work than that of creation (mentioned only in tlie fourth com- mand, because then it was the greatest) and which now by all men ought to be remembered with more thankfulness and praise than it. ^ Quest. 60. How is the Sahhath io he sancti- fied? Jlns. The Sabbath is to be sanctifiad, by a holy resting all that day, even from such worldly em- ployments and recreations as are lawful otr other days, and spendins; the whole time in the public and private exercises of God's worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy. Q. la what sense is God said to sanctify the sabbath, or hal- low it? A. By consecrating or setting it apart to holy uses and em- ployments. ' :-^::;rT r,- .• Q. In what sense may we be said to sahctify the sabbath? A. By keeping it holy to God, or applying it to these holy ends and exercises for which God hath set it apirf. Q. What is the holy rest which is required uoon the sabbath^ P2 Ki OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. A. It is a total cessation from worldly employments and recrea- tions. Q, Why must we abstain from these vpon the sahbath? A, Because God hath forbidden them, and because they would prove a hinderance to his worship and service upon it. Q. lloiolongmust we abstain from our etnploifmcnts and re- creations ? A. Through the whole sabbath day. Q. V^'hy may we not use some recreations after public worship is over, such as icalking the fields, or the like? A. 1. Because the whole day is the Lord's, and ought to be kept holy to him; and it is sacrilege to alienate any part of what h the Lord's, to our own use or pleasure. 2. We are expressly prohibited to find our own pleasure upon God's holy day, Isa. Iviii. 13. Q. Why are worldly recreations or diversions forbidden on this day? A. Because they hinder the spiritual work of the sabbath, and indispose the mind more for spiritual exercises than men's ordi- nary employments would do. Q. Is there no kind of work or business of ours lauful upon the sabbath ? A. No, except it be the works of necessity and mercy. Q. What are these works of necessity which are lawful on the aabhath? A. They are such actions as could not be prevented by our previous care, nor safely delayed till afterwards; as the defending ourselves against enemies, or fleeing from them; quenching fire, putting on clothes, and the like. Q. What are the works of mercy lawful on the sabbath ? A. Actions for preserving life; such as the feeding of our bodies and our beasts, relieving them when in distress, at- tending and visiting the sick, collecting for the poor, and the li-ke. Q. How ought we to manage in doing works of necessity ihis day, so as not to of end? A» We must have no active hand in bringing them on, nor any secret complacency in their falling out; we must study to keep our hearts in a spiritual frame while doing them, and dis- patch them as soon as possible, that we may return to the main work of the sabbath. Q. What is the frame of spirit proper for us on the Lord''s day ? OF THE FOURTH COMMANDMENT. 175 A. It is a holy spiritual frame of heart, such as John speaks of, Rev. i. 10, " I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day." Q. What is imported in this expression, i was in the Spirit? A, It innports, to have our thoughts abstracted iVom earthly things, and to lay our souls open to the influences of God's Spirit, and to depend upon his assistance in all the duties of the day. — It is to have the graces of the Spirit in exercise, and to have spiri- tual ends in all our sabbath exercises, not to be seen of men, but **to glorify God, and enjoy communion with him. Q. What are the holy duties which are the proper worh of the sabbath? A. The public, private, and secret exercises of God's w or- ship. Q. V\fha.t are the public exercises requisite? A. The joining in prayers and praises with the assemblies of God's people, the hearing of the word read or preached, and par- taking of the sacraments. Q, What are the private exercises required on that day? A. It is necessary for families to join together this day in the worship of God, by reading his word, singing his praise, and calling upon his name; and to spend some time in catechising of children and servants, repeating the sermons, or christian con- ference. Q. Are all masters of families bound to worship God with their families? A, Yes. Q. How do you prove that? A. 1st. From the fourth command, that enjoins every head of a family, with all that are within his gates, be they his children, his servants, or strangers, to keep holy the sabbath day, which must be by worshipping of God as well as resting from labour, otherwise he would keep it no belter than the beasts: and this worship is not to be restricted to what is public only, for the command is still binding upon masters of families, though no public w6rship could be had: they must sanctify the sabbath in their dwellings, Lev. xxiii. 3. 2dly. Masters of families are bound to rule their families as ministers do the church, which partly is by going before them in the worship of God, 1 Tim. iii. 4,5. 3dly. We are enjoined to pray every where, and with all manner of prayer, and consequently with family prayer, 1 Tim. ii. 8. Eph. vi. 18. 4lhly. Upon the Lord's returning to his people, he promises to pour out a Spirit of grace and supplica- tion upon families, so as every family shall mourn apart, Zech. xii. 10, 12, 13. Sthly. Wrath hangs over the faniili I, 6, 7. 1 Sam. xxvi. 9, 10, 15. Q. What are the duties of magistrates to their suljects? A. To make good laws, and appoint faithful officers to exe- cute them; to be careful of the peace and safety of their subjects; to be encouragers of virtue, and punishers of vice; to govern with prudence, justice and clemency; to relieve ihe oppressed ; to pro- vide means of grace for all the souls in their dominions; and to be nursing fathers to the church, 2 Chron. xix. 5, 6, 7, and xvii. 8,9, 12. 1 Pet. ii. 14. 2 Chron. i. 10, and ii. 1. Isa. xlix. 23. 2 Kings xii. 7, and xviii. 4, and xxiii. 21 . Neh. xiii. 10, 11. Q . What duties are required of people to their ministers ? A. To esteem and love them dearly for their office and work's sake; to pray for them, and attend upon the ordinances dispensed by them; to submit to their reproofs and censures; to hearken, to apply and conform to their doctrine; to shut their ears against malicious reports raised against them, and communicate to them in temporal good things, 1 Thess. v. 12, 13, 25. Rom. xv. 30. Luke x. 16. Ileb. xiii. 17, 18. James i. 21. 1 Tim. v. 19.— Gal. vi 6. 1 Cor. ix. 14. Q. What are the duties of ministers to their people? A. To preach the word faithfully, and dispense all ordinances to them; to have tender love and affection to their souls; to pray fervently for them; to reside amongst them, and watch carefully over them; to be patterns of godly living unto them; and to be willing to make the greatest condescensions for the edification and good of souls, 2 Tim. iv. 2, 3, 6. 1 Thess. ii. 7, 8, 9, 10.— Eph. i. 16, 16. J Peter v. 2, 3. Tit. ii. 7. J Cor. ix. 10, H. 2 Cor. xii. 19. O^ TME FIFni COMMANDMENT. 133 Q. What duties are required of servants to their masters ? A. To love, honour and obey them; to be faithful in all things intrusted to them; to be diligent in their work, and study to please them well in ail things; to bear their rebukes patiently, not answering again, Matt. vi. 24. 1 Tim. vi. 1. Col. iii. 2^. Tif. ii. 9, 10. 1 Pet ii. IS, 19, Gen. xxiv. 12. Q. What are the duties of masters to their servants? A. To rule over them with gentleness, and not with rigour; to give them sufficient food, and pay them their wages justly; to be careful of them under sickness; to reprove sin in them, in- struct them, and to command them to keep the waysof the Lord, and particularly his sabbaths, Eph. vi. 9. Lev. xxv. 43. Trov. xxviii. 27. Deut. xxiv. 14, 15. Matt. viii. 6. Prov. xxix. 19, Gen.xviii, 19. Exod. xx. 10, Q. IVhat are the duties of wives to their husbands? A. To love them, and be faithful to them in all things; to give them due respect and reverence, and to be obedient to them; to study to please them, and to be helps to them in family-affairs; to warn them of any evils or dangers they may be exposed to; to study, by a meek, quiet, chaste, and loving conversation, to a- cKtJ€r?«€/iro?n OF THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT. 193 hlood-guiltiness, O Godj Gen. ix. 6. Rom. xii. 19. John viii. 44. Gen. iv. 10. Psal.li. 14. Quest. 70. which is the seventh commandment? •ins, The seventh commandment is, Thou shalt not commit adultery. Quest. 7i» ^hat is required in the seventh com- mandment ? Ans, The seventh commandment requireth the preservation of our own and our neighbour's chastity, in heart, speech and behaviour, Q. What is it that ought to he dearest to us, next to our life? A. Our chastity. Q. Whose chastity doth the seventh command require the pres- ervation of? A. Our own and our neighbour's. Q. In luhat must we preserve our own and our neighhour''s chastity ? A. In heart, speech and behaviour. Q. What is meant here by chastity.^ A. Not abstinence from marriage, but abstinence from all uncleanness and filthiness, whether in a married or unmarried state. Q. May persons be both chaste and married? A. Yes; for the apostle recommends to married women a " chaste conversation coupled with f ear, '''^ 1 Pet. iii. 2. Q. What is meant by that chastity in heart, speech and beha- viour, ichich we must study to preserve? A. 1. That we may entertain no thoughts nor desires bdt what are pure and chaste, whatever company we be in. 2. That our discourse one with another must be grave and uncorrupt, and such as may tend to edification. 3. That our whole con- versation, gestures and actions, must be chaste, modest and de- cent, as becometh Christians. Q. Why should we be so careful to preserve our chastity? A. Because we are rational creatures, and not brates; chris- tians, and not heathens; and the bodies of christians should be members of Christ, and temples of the Holy Ghost, and con- sequently ought to be kept clean and pure. Nay, it is God's express command, that we should abstain from fornication and R 194 OF THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT. all uncleanness, and that we should possess our vessels in sanc- tification and honour, 1 Cor. vi. 15, 18, 19. 1 Thess. iv. 3, 4, 6. Eph. iv. 17, 18, 19,andv,3. Q, By what means shall we preserve our chastity? A. By failh and prayer, by watching over our hearts and eyes; by temperance in our diet, diligence in our callings, keeping of chaste company, and avoiding all tempations to and occasions of uncleanness, Acts XV. 9. Malt. vi. 13. Prov. iv. 23. Jobxxxi. 1. Jer. V. 8. Gen. xxxiv. 1, 2. Prov, ii. 16. Gen. xxxiv. 10. I Cor. ix. 27. Prov. v. 8, Quest. 72» what is forbidden in the seventh com- mandment ? tdtns. The seventh com mandment forbiddeth all unchaste thoughts, words and actions. Q. Doth this command yorhid all lustful thoughts and de^ sires ? A. Yes, Matt. v. 28. " Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his lieart." Q. Is not adultery here to he understood of any sort ofuncleanr ness? A. Yes. Q. Doth this command forhid all obscene speeches, lascivious jests and songs? A, Yes, Eph. v. 4. "Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient." Q. What are the unchaste actions j or acts of uncleanness, here forbidden ? A. Adultery, fornication, polygamy, rape, incest, sodomy, and all unnatural lust; prohibiting of lawful marriages, and dis- pensing with those that are unlawful; unjust divorce or deser- tion; keeping or allowing of stews, and all other actions which have a tendency to promote or encourage unchastity and un- cleanness, Heb. xiii. 4. 1 Cor. vi. 18. Gal. v. 19. Mai. ii. 14, 15, 16. Matt. xix. 5. Deut. xxii. 25. Lev. xviii. 6, 20, 22, 23. Gen, xxxviii, 9. Rom, i. 24, 26. 1 Tim. iv. 3. Mark vi. 18, 1 Cor. v. 1. 2 Cor. vi. 14. Matt. v. 32. 1 Cor. vii. 12, 13. Lev, xix. 29. Jer. v. 7. Q. Who are these who prohibit lawful marriages? A. The Papists, who forbid the marriage of ecclesiastical per- sons, and those who (they pretend) have spiritual affinity togeth- er, as god-fathers, god-mothers, and the children the^ present tq baptism. OP THE SEVEMTH COMMANDMENT. 195 Q. Hav^e they any ground for such prohibitions from scrip- hire ? A. No; for the scripture doth declare marriage to be lawful agid honourable in all, as being instituted by God before the fall ; and doth condemn the forbidding to marry, as false doc- trine. Besides, the prophets and Priests were married under the Old Testament, as were Peter and other apostles under the New, Heb. xiii. 4. Geri. ii. 18, 22,24. Lev. xxi. 7,13. I Cor. vii. 2, 9, and ix. 5. Luke iv. 38. Acts xxi. 8, 9. 1 Tim. iii. 2, 4. Q. Who doth dispense with unlawful marriages? A, The pope, who for money doth dispense with incestuous marriages; that is, of persons near a-kin, and within the degrees forbidden by the word of God. Q. Where are these degrees explained in which incest is com- mitted ? A. In Lev. xviii. 7, 8,9, &c. and xx. 11, 14. Deut. xxvii. 20, ^22, 23. Q. In what cases can married persons he divorced^ or their marriage disannulled? A. Only in the cases of adultery and wilful desertion. Matt. xix. 9. 1 Cor. vii. 15. Q. Who teach oilwrwise? A. The Papists, who hold that they may be divorced, when either the man or the woman thinks fit to retire into a clois' ter. Q. What other actions or things are there forhidden in this eommandmcni, which have a tendency to promote or encourage uncleannessi A. Tiiey are such as drunkenness, gluttony, idleness, frequen- ting light company, listening to filthy speeches or songs, lasci- vious books and pictures, plays and dancings, immodest attire, wanton looks and gestures, and the like. Q. What are the etiils of this sin of tmcleanness ? A. It is most hateful and dishonourable to a Holy God; it de- bases a man from the excellency of his nature, and levels him with the beasts; it is an infatuating sin, that takes away the heart, blinds the mind, and stupifies the conscience: it wastes the means, destroys the body, rots the good name, and damns the joul. Nay, it murders two souls at once, 2 Sam. xi. 27. 1 Cor. vi. 15, 18, 19. Hos. iv, 11. Prov. vi. 26, 32,33. Prov. v. 8, 9, 10, 11. Eph. v. 3, 4, 5. Rev. xiii. 4, and xxi. 8, and xxii. 15. Q. What are the remedies against this sin ? A We must pray to God, for Christ's sake, for a new heart to 196 OF TUB EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. hale all sin, and to be kept from temptation to sin; shun lewd company, and watch over the heart and eyes; keep up the re- membrance of God's all seeing eye being still upon us, and think often upon the burning flames prepared for these who burn with lust. Quest. 73. Which is the eighth commandmeni? Jlns, The eighth coramaudment is, Thou shalt not steal. Quest. 74. What is required in the eighth com- mandment ? Jins. The eighth commandment requireth the law- ful procuring and furthering the wealth and outward estate oFourselves and others. Q. Whose wealth and estate doth this command concern? A. Both our own and other men's- Q. What doth it require of us with respect to them ? A. To use means to procure and preserve them. O. May we use any means whatsoever for that end ? A. No; for we must use only lawful means to profit ourselves or others. Q. Doth not this command suppose, that there is no com- munity of goods, but that every man hath a propriety in his es- iate? A. Yes; for otherwise there would be no place- for this com- mand; no man could say, This is mine, or, That is thine; nor could he give alms toothers. A community of goods cannot take place but by consent of the proprietors in a time or case ex- traordinary, Acts ii. 44. Q. Is it lawful to seek to increase our wordly estate more than it is ? A. Yes, Gen. xlvii. 14. Deut. viii. 18. Prov. xiii. 11. Q. For what ends should we endeavor to increase it? A. 1st, We should chiefly aim at the glory of God, that we may be capable to honour him with our substance, and be kept from sinning against him by stealing or false swearing, as in Prov. ■iXK. 8, 9. 2dly, That we may help others, Eph. iv. 28. 3dly, That we may keep ourselves and families from being burdensome to others. And, lastly, That we may avoid idleness. Q. IV hat means must we use to procure and further our world' ly estate? A. We must be diligent and laborious in honest and lawful OF THE EIGHTH COMMMANDENT. 197 callings; we must live soberly and frugally, and manage our af- fairs with prudence and discretion ; we must look to tlie Lord for success in our endeavours, be just in all our dealings, be ready to supply the needy, use proper means to obtain what belongs to us, but avoid unnecessary law suits and suretiship, 1 Cor. vii. 20. — Gen. iv. 2. Prov. x. 4. Eph. iv. 28 . Tit. ii. 12. Psalm cxii. 3. Prov. X. 22. 1 Pet. v. 7. Prov. x. 6, and xi. 24, 25, 1 Cor. vi. 1, 2, &:c. Prov. vi. 1, 2. Q. Is it unlawful for Christians to go to latu, to defend or re- cover their ownl A. No. Q . Doth not the apostle blame them for going to law one with another, saying, Why do you not rather take wrong, Sfc? 1 Cor. vi.7. A, He is there blaming them for going to law about family matters before heathen magistrates, and telling them that they should make up differences among themselves, or suffer wrong, rather than by wrangling to bring a scandal upon their holy re- ligion, and stumble the heathen at Christianity. Q. Doth not Christ say, Matt. v. 40. If any man wiU sue thee at law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also 2 A. His meaning is, That we should part with some smaller thing, such as a coat or a cloak, rather than involve ourselves in a vexatious law suit; but not that we should let any man undo las when God hath blessed us with good laws for our protec- tion. Q . May we seek after the world as our treasure? A. No, but as a help under God in our journey; we must lay up our treasure in heaven, and secure a portion for ourselves there through eternity. Q. Should we not he ready to assist poor widows and orphans with our money, and lend to those who are in need? A. Yes, James i. 27. Psalm cxii. 5. Q . What must we do to promote and further the wealth of oth- ers ? A. We must be true and just in all transactions with others, and render to every one his due. We should preserve our neigh- bour's goods, and restore them to him if they be in our hands; we should wish and seek their good as weU as our own, and do in all thingrs to them as we would have them to do to us. Psalm xv. 2,4. Zeeh. viii. 16, 17. Rom. xiii. T. Lev. vi. 2, 3, die. — 1 Cor. X. 24. Matt. vii. 12. Q^aest.75. What is forbidden in the eighth com- mandment ? 198 OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. Ans. The eighth commandment forbiddeth what- soever doth or may unjustly hinder our own neigh- bour's wealth, or outward estate. Q . What 18 implied in the sin of stealing, hereforhidden ? A. The injuring of ourselves or others in worldly estate, and the usincr unlawful means to gain the world. Q : What way may we injure our own worldly estate, and thereby steal from ourselves? A. By idleness, sloth, negligence in our calling; by rash enga- ging in suretiship and imprudent bargains; by prodigality, and wasteful spending in gluttony, drunkenness, lewd company, cost- ly apparel, gaming, and the like, 2 Thess. iii. 11. Prov. xviii. 9, and xxiii. 2 1 , and xxii. 26, 27, and xxviii. 1 9, and xxi. 1 7. Q. Is it a sin for men to live above their incomes or gains? A. Yes; for hereby they destroy their own estate, hinder their own charity, and waste the substance of others also. Q. Is not the using of unlawful ways and means to enrich or subsist ourselves and families, a sin against the eighth com' mandment? A. Yes; for this is no better than stealing and dishonesty in the sight of God, however matters be disguised with fair cloaks and pretexts before men. Q. }^hat are these unlawful ways of enriching or subsisting ourselves? A. They are such as these; immoderate cares and labour, cov- etousness, hastening to be rich, excessive narrowness, gaming, usury, monopolies, running of goods, lying, false-swearing, break- ing the sabbath, bribery, simony, selling masses, pardons and in- dulgences, using unlawful callings and occupations, or taking any ways to defraud or overreach others to gain money. Q. How is covetousness against the eighth command? A. Because the covetous man is guilty of stealing from seve- ral; 1. From God and his church, in not giving any thing to pious uses. 2. From his neighbour, in refusing to help him in straits. 3. From himself and his family, in depriving them of the neces- sary comforts of life. All which are against Prov. iii. 9. Mai. iii. 8, 10. 1 Cor. ix. 14. Gal. vi. 6. Isa. iviii. 7. Eccl. iv. 8, and vi. 2. 1 Tim. v. 8. Q. Do niggards, who have no heart to use what they have, sin greatly? A. Yes; for they defraud themselves and their families of the comfort and use of these good things which God hath bestowed upon them, and so cannot be thankful to God the bountiful giv- OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDJMENT. 199 €r. They are uncharitable to those in need; for he that will not allow to himself, will not love another better than himself. They are hurtful to the society and generation they live among; for they hoard up that, which, if others had, the poor would be employed, and others would be the better of it, Eccl. iv. 8, and vi. 2, 1 Tim. V.8. Psalmxxxvii.3,26, 27. Job xxix. 12,13, 14, 15, 16.Psal. cxii. 3, 5, 9. Q. Is the gaining of money by usury unlawful? A. Yes, Prov. xxviii. 8. Psalm xv. 6. Q. What is usury? A, The taking unlawful profit for money that is lent out. Q. Is it lawful to take any interest or gain for money lent? A. Yes, when it is taken according to the laws of the land, and from these who make gain by it, by trading or purchasing of lands; seeing it is equally just for the owner of money to ask a share of the profit which others make by it, as for the owner of the land to demand farm from the tenant of it, money being improve- able by art and labour as well as land. Q. What is the unlawful prof t for money j which may be cal' led usury ? A. The taking profit for money from the poor who borrow for mere necessity, or taking needful things from them in pawn for it; or the taking more profit for any than law allows, as these who take ten, fifteen, or twenty in the hundred, Exod. xxii. 25, 26. Deut. xxiv. 12,17. Ezek.'xviii. 7,8. Q. But were not the people of Israel discharged to take any usury or prof t for lent money from their brethren? Deut. xxiii, i9. A. This law seems to have been peculiar to the Jewish state, and that in regard of their estates being so divided, settled, and secured to their families by the year jubilee, and their not being employed in trading or making purchases like other nations, so that they had no occasion to borrow money but for the present subsistence of their families. But for strangers, who had anoth- er way of living, the Israelites were allowed to lend upon usury, and to share with them in their profits, Deut. xxiii. 20, which shews that the taking of interest is not oppressive in itself; for Ihey are frequently prohibited to oppress a stranger, and yet al- lowed to take usury from him, Exod. xxii. 21. and xxiii. 9. Q. What is meant by monopolies, here forbidden? A, The engrossing or buying up of some commodities, espe- cially corn and provisions for the poor, in order to exact great prices from them afterwards, Prov. xi. 26. He that withholdeth corn, the people shall curse him: but blessing shall be upon the head of him thai selleth it. 200 OF THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT. Q. V^'hat is the evil of xunn'mg of goods? A. It is a denying to render custom to whom it is due; be- sides, there are many other sins which commonly attend this practice, as perjury, bribery, lying, sabbath-breaking, bloodshed, &,c. Q. What is meant hy bribery, which is here forbidden? A. It is the taking or giving of bribes or gifts to pervert justice, Prov. xvii. 23. A wicked man taketh a gift out of the bosom, to pcrvej't the ways of judgment. Q. What is meant 63/ simony, here forbidden? A. h is a buying and selling of the offices and places of min- isters and other spiritual things, for money, good deeds, or favour. A vile practice! it being a token that the design of the purchasers is to make money by them. It is a sin marked out as odious by the Spirit of God, for it tends to destroy all true religion. It is called simony, from that wicked person Simon Magus, Acts viii. 18, 19. " He offered them money, saying. Give me also this pow- er, that on whomsoever I lav hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost." Q. V^ho are these who sell pardons, indulgences and masses? A. The popish priests do it for money, like thfe Pharisees, who under a pretence of long prayers devoured widows' houses. Matt. xxiii. 14. So the priests under pretence of long prayers for the dead, and saying soul-masses, enrich themselves by devouring the houses of the widows and fatherless, Rev. xviii. 13. Q. Who are these who use unlawful trades and occupations to gain money? A. Highway-men, thieves, bawds, stage-players, jugglers, for- tune-tellers, usurers, smugglers, ingrossers, gamesters, and games: also these who make a trade of harbouring such people in their houses, or letting houses to them; and particularly these change- keepers, who for the love of gain do entertain drunkards, unclean persons, thieves, profaners of the Lord's day, and such loose per- sons. Q. How are people guilty of breaking the eighth command^ hy plain stealing from others, or injuring them in their worldly estate? A. Besides what hath been already mentioned, people are guilty of it by thieving, robbing, man-stealing, resetting of thieves and stolen goods, frauds in merchandising, unfaithfulness in con- tracts and matters of trust, falsehood in promises, denying just debts, or not paying them, vexatious law-suits, borrowing what we cannot pay, detaining any thing strayed or lost, or what we have wrongfully taken; all extortion and oppression, unjust ijiclo- fiures and depopulations, removing ancient land-marks, sacrilege, OF THE NINTPl COMMANDMENT. 201 wronging the coin, denying public taxes, withholding the wages of servants and labourers, rigorous exacting of debts, stopping the ear at the cry of the poor, Eph. iv. 28. Psalm Ixii. 10. I Tim. i. 10. Prov. xxix. 24. 1 Thess. iv. 6- Psalm xxxvii. 21. Luke xvi. 12. Hos. iv. 1. Deut. xxii. 1,2, &c. Prov. iii. 28, 29, 30. I Cor. vi. 6. Lukexix. 8. Ezek. xxii. 12, 29. Lev.xxv. 17. Isa. V. 8. Mic. ii, 2. Prov. xxiii. 10. Rom. ii. 22. Matt. xxii. 21. Rom. xiii. 6, 7. Lev. xix. 13. Matt, xviii. 28. Prov. xxi. 13. Deut. XV. 7. Q. What are these frauds in merchandising here forbidden? A. Circumvening or overreaching others in buying or selling; taking advantage of their ignorance or necessity; imposing on them by lies; deceitful commending of goods when selling, and undervaluing them when buying; selling things bad for good; using false balances, weights or measures; taking exorbitant pri- ces; undermining others in their trade, by withdrawing their cus- tomers, or wronging their credit. Lev. xxv. 14. Prov. xx. 14. Lev. xix. 35, 36. Deut. xxv. 13, &c. Prov. xi. 1. Amos viii. 5, 6. Prov. xxviii.22. 1 Cor. xiii 4. Phil. ii. 4. Q. What is the sin q/' sacrilege here forbidden? A. Robbing or taking things away from God or his church that do properly belong unto them; or alienating any thing dedicated to sacred uses: which, among other things, do include the sins of non-residence and negligence of pastors; and the robbing chris- tian congregations of their right of calling their own ministers, JMal. iii. 8, 9. Prov. xx. 25. Joshua vii. 20, 21. 2 Chron. xxviii, 21.2 Tim. iv. 2. 1 Pet. v. 2, 3. Acts i. 23, and vi. 3. Jer. xxiii. 1,2. Q. Is stealing a way to he rich ? A, No, it brings poverty; for the curse of God is against the thief, Zech. v. 3, 4. Q. Is not the thief of kin to the atheist ? A. Yes, for he practically denies God's omnipresence and his all-seeing eye over him, and that he is a righteous Judge who will call him to account. Q. Must not all guilty of wronging others in their goods, re- pent and make restitution, as they would have mercyjrom God? A. Yes, Lev. vi. 4. Ezek. xxxiii. 15. Lukexix. 8. Quest. 76. which is the ninth commandment P Ans. The ninth commandment is, Thou shalt not beaivfalse witness against thy neighbour. Quest. 77. what is required in the ninth com- mandment P 202 OF TriE NINTH COxMMANDMfiNT. •Sihs, The ninth commandment requireth the main* fainiiig and promoting of truth between man and man, and of our own and our neighbour's good name, especially in witness-bearing. Q . How many duties doth thu answer mention as required of us by the ninth commandment? A. They are four; 1. The maintaining and promoting of truth between man and man. 2. Maintaining and promoting of our own good name. 3. Maintaining and promoting of our neigli* hour's good name. 4. Being concerned for all these, especially in witness-bearing.. Q. \'\hy especially in witness hearingt A. Because then we are solemnly required to tell the truth, as being before a judge, and upon oath, whereby God is appealed to. Q. How ought we to 'maintain and promote truth amongst men? A. By loving the truth, speaking the truth sincerely, standing and appearing for the truth; and judging and deciding for the truth. Zech. viii. 16; 19. Prov. xxxi. 8,9. Exod. xviii. 21. Psalm XV. 2. Q. Why are we required to speah the truth sincerely or from the heart? A. Because the devil and bad men sometimes speak the truth from an evil design, Mark i. 24. 1 Sam. xxii. 9, 10. Q. Wherefore ought we to maintain and promote our own good name? A. That we may be capable to glorify God, and do the more good in our day and generation. Q. Doth an evil report of men hinder their usefulness? A. Yes. Q. Who aremore especially concerned to maintain their good name ? A. Magistrates, ministers, and professors of religion. Q. Is commending ourselve,s, or carrying proudly^ the way to maintain or prom ot-c our good name? A. No^ but rather the way to procure contempt. Q. Wliat are the proper means then to obtain a good name? A. We must study to be humble, harmless, sober, meek, chaste and just; to keep our word exactly; to be ready to serve others; and, in a word, to practice whatsoever things are true, honest, lovely, and of good report, Col. iii. 12. Phil. ii. 15, and iv. 8. Q. Ought we not to vindicate ourselves when we are reproach- ed? OF THE NINTH COMMANDMENT. S03 A. Yes; but with meekness, and readiness to forgive those who reproach us, Q. What if they do not hearken to us, nor believe us ? A. We must commit the cause to him that judgeth righteous- Q. What is incumbent upon us to maintain our neighbour''s good name? A, We ought to have a due esteem of all the good we see in them, and be willing to express this seasonably for their encour- agement in the ways of God ; we should be ready to hearken to a good report, and unwilling to receive a bad report concerning them; conceal their infirmities, discourage tale bearers, speak well of them behind their backs, and stand up in their defence when we know them traduced, Phil. ii. 3. Heb. vi. 9. Rom. i. 8. lCor.xiii.6. Psal. xv.3. Prov. xxv. 23, and xvii. 9. I JSam. xxii. 14. Q. But what should we do when the bad reports we hear of our neighbours are evidently true? A, We should be grieved for their miscarriages, and contribute what we can, by our admonitions, advices, and prayers, for their amendment, and for the recovery of their good names again, % Cor . ii. 4 . Matt , xviii , 1 5, &c . Quest. 78. what is forbidden in the ninth com^ mandment P Jins. The ninth commandment forbiddeth whatso- ever is prejudicial to truth, or injurious to our own or our neighbour's good name. Q. What evils doth this answer set forth as forbidden in this command ? A, Three: I , Saying or doing any thing that is prejudicial to truth . 2 . Saying or doing any thing injurious to our own good name. 3. Saying or doing any thing injurious to our neighbor's good name. Q. \^hat are these things here forbidden , which are prejudi^ cialto truth? Ai The wronging of truth, or any wise acting against it, in courts of judicature; the speaking of untruth, falsehood, or telling lies upon any account whatsoever; equivocating, perverting the truth, falsifying our word, and the like. Q. How do men injure the truth in courts of judicature ? A. By persons informing against or accusing others falsely; by the accused person's denying that of which he is gqiUy ; by 204 OF THE NINTH COMMANDMENT. suborning false witnesses; by witnesses concealing or disguising the truth, or witnessing falsely; by persons agenting and pleading against the truth, or for an evil cause; by forgery, or making u§e of false writings; by perverting of men's words to a wrong mean- ing; by undue silence in a just cause, or not acting faithfully for it; bypassing unjustsentences, justifying the guilty, or condemn- ing the innocent, Lukexxiii. 2. Acts xxix. 2, 5. Gen.iv. 9. Actsvi. 13. 1 Kings xxi. 13. Isa. v. 23. Psalm cxix. 69. Lev.v. 1. 2Tim. iv. 16. Isa.x.l. Prov.xvii. 15, and xxxi. 8, 9. Q. Is every man that speaks an untruth guilty of lying ? A, No, he is not, if he really think the thing to be true which he speaks, although it may be false. Q. What is it you mean by a lie then? A. A man's speaking of any thing which he knows to be false, and telling it with a design to deceive. Q. What is the evil of lying? A. 1. It is a sin most hateful to God, who is a God of truth. 2. It tends to destroy all human society and commerce among men. 3. It makes a man a child of the devil ; for he is a liar, and the father of lies, Prov.vi. 17. John viii. 44. Q. Doth not God testify his high displeasure against the sin of lying? A. Yes, and that even in this world ; for God struck Ananias and Sapphira dead with a lie in their mouths. Q. What is the portion of liars hereafter ? A. All liars shall have their part with the father of lies in the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone; for God hath said it, Rev. xxi. 8. Q. Is it not then one of the icorst names, to call a man a liar? A. Yes; and therefore we should guard against doing it. Q. But what if the person so called do deserve the name ? A, Then we should be grieved for it, and reprove him, not in passion to expose him, but in the spirit of meekness m order to amend him. Q. May not a man tell a lie, to preserve his own or his neigh- hour'' s life? A. No; for we must not do evil that good may come. Nay, we must not lie, though it were to advance the glory of God, Job xiii. 7. Rom. iii. 7, 8. And, though some of the scripture-saints may have failed in this respect, we must not follow iheir exam- ple, but live by precept. Q. WJiat think you of the Popish doctrine and practice of equivocations, and of keeping no faith with heretics? OF THE NINTH COMMANDMENT. 205 A. They are abominable. Q. W hat do you think of these who lie in Jest, to make sport to others ? A. God calls them fools that make a mock of sin, Prov. xiv. 9. Q. What are these things injurious to our own good name, which the ninth commandment forbids ? A, They are such as, thinking or speaking too highly, or too meanly of ourselves; flattering, vaunting and vain glori- ous boasting; accusing ourselves of what we are not guilty; aggravating smaller faults too much; excusing or extenuat- ing sins, when called to a free confession; denying the gifts or graces which God hath given us; rash exposing our in- firmities before the wicked; speaking or doing any thing which may be a blot upon our name, Rom. xii. 16. Luke xviii. IJ. Exod. iv. 10. 2 Tim. iii. 2. Psalm xii. 3. 1 Cor. xiii. 4, 5. Matth. vii. 3. Prov. xxviii. 13. Gen. iii. 12, 13. Job xxvii. 6. Col. ii. 18. Prov. xiv. 34. Q. What are the things injurious to our neighhour''s good name, here forbidden? A. AH slandering, backbiting, reproaching, scolding, tak- ing up and spreading evil reports, evil speaking, rash judging or censuring, whispering, tale bearing, misconstructing the actions, words, or intentions of others; not covering their infirmities, stopping our ears against their vindication; not clearing their innocence when we know it; speaking truth with an ill design against them; being glad at their miscar- riage or disgrace; scornful contempt; scoffing; fond admira- tion of some, to the disparagement of others, Psal. 1. 20. Job xix, 3. Psal. XV. 3. James iv. II. Rom. i. 29, 30, Lev. xix. 6. Neh. vi. 6, &c. Rom. iii. 8. Psal. Ixix. 10. iSam.i. 13, 14. Acts vii. 67. 1 Sam. xxii. 9. Jer. xlviii. 27. Psalm xxxv. 15, 16. Gen.xxi. 9. Jude 16. Q. Though we may not raise a false report, yet may we nci repeat it after hearing it? A, No; for that is to spread it; wherefore, though a false report be laid at our foot, we should be unwilling to take it up, Psal. XV. 3. Q. Ought we not io discourage all backbiters and tale hear- ers ? A. Yes : for such do so2v discord among brethren, and sepa- rate chief friends; and we may suspect, that these who brmg such tales to us, will be ready also to take some away, Prov. tI, 39. andxvi. 9. and xxv. 23 . S COG OF THE TENTH COMMANDMENT- Quest. 79. Which is the tenth commandwent? Ans» The tenth comraandment is, Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid- servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's. Quest. 80, what is required in the tenth com- mandment P *lns. The tenth commandment requireth full con tentment with our own condition, with a right and charitable frame of spirit toward our neighbour and all that is his. Q . In what verse of the New Testament have we thii command summed up and explained? A. In Heb. xiii. 6. " Let your conversation be without cove- tousness, and be content with such things as ye have." Q. If hen the ansiccr hears that the command requires full contentment with our condition, doth it mean that we should be content to live in a sinful condition? A. No; for God quarrels with sinners for such a contentment, Rev. iii. 17. Q. Doih it mean that we should he insensible or unconcerned under an affiicted condition? A. No; for God is displeased with this too, Jer. v. 3. Hos. vii. 9. Q. What is the meaning of it then ? A. That we should be well satisfied with that portion of the necessaries and comforts of this life, which God in his wisdom sees fit to bestow upon us, without grudging or repining at his will, but freely acquiescing in God's determination, as that which is best and most fit for us. Q. Who are these that attain to this contentment ? A. These who have their spirits suited to their condition. Q. Are not these the happiest persons in the world? A. Yes; for they have a mercy that is better than the greatest fulness of earthly things. Q. May a man as soon attain to this happiness of contentment vnth a little of the world, as with much of it ? A. Yes; for the apostle Paul, who had little of it, was well con- tented with his httle; and, upon the occasion of a small supply OF THE TENTH COMMANDMENT. 207 sent him from Philippi, he saitli, I have all, and abound; I am y>/Z/, Phil. iv. 11, 18. Whereas, Ahab, who had a kingdom, was full of vexation and discontent for want of Naboth's vineyard; and 30 was Haman, though laden with riches and honors, for want of a bow from Mordecai, 1 Kings xxi. 4, 5, 6. Esther v. 11, 12, 13. Q. How do believers arrive at such contentment with a little of t^ic vjorld ? A. l^hey learn it of God, who teacheth them to believe and think upon their own unworthiness; to consider that their Lord had not where to lay his head, that God will give them what is best for them, and that their portion in Christ and eternal life is large enough for all their wants. Q. How is it thai riches do not afford contentment to the men of this 7varld? A. Besides that the world is but vanity, there is a secret curse attending their enjoyments, which blasts the comfort of them; hence the earthly heart is, like the grave, never satisfied, but still would have more, Eccl. v. lo. Prov. xxx. 15, 1^. Q. Is it covetousness for a man to desire more of this world than what he hath? A. No, if he desire it for good ends, with submission to God's will, and use honest means to get it. Q. What then is the covetousness here forbidden? A. It is to desire the good things which another enjoys; and to grudge at their having of them. Q. May not a man wish for the estate of another^ if he design to do more good with it than he doth? A. Na; for the heart is most deceitful, and its purposes varia- ble; hence he is called a. fool that trusieth in his own heart, Prov. xxviii. 2b. Jer. xvii. 9, Q. Are they not strangers then to their own hearts, who think they would he contented if they had a little more of the world than v:hat they have ? A. Yes; for the desires of the heart enlarge with the estate. Q. Are not these far wiser, who are desirous to obtain the true riches of saving grace, and the promises of the covenant? A. Yes; for these will abide with them, when other riches will make themselves wings, and fly away from them, and even then when they stand most in need of help. Q. H '0 may those who are poor attain to contentment with their lot, and be kept from covetousness? A. By placing their chief happiness in the enjoyment of God; and by considering that their worldly condition is of God's car- ving, and that they have more than they deserve; that many better 208 OF THE TKNTH COMMANDiMEiNT. have been in worse circumstances; that many are the worse for riches, but few or none the better; and that as they brought noth- ing into this world, so they shall carry nothing out. Psal. xvi. 5, 6. Hab, iii. 17, 18. Gen. xxxii. 10. Job i. 21. Heb.xi 38. Eccl.v. 13. 1 Tim. vi. 7, 8. Q. Is not to be truly godly, the short way to conientmcni? A. Yes; for godliness is that, unto which only true content- ment is annexed, 1 Tim. vi. 6. Christ hath purchased this grace unto all who believe in him. Q. Have not the godly poor some special arguments to make them easy under their st raits 1 A. Yes, by considering that God designs these very straits for their good, to keep them humble and depending; that he sees riches would be a snare to draw their hearts away from God; that it is rare to see a ricli man eminent in grace; that God hath been ffir kinder to them in giving them a portion in his well ordered covenant, a goodly heritage, which is infinitely more excellent and durable than any other. Q. How shall the rich attain contentment in their full condi- tion ? A. By seeking grace from God, and not expecting happiness from the things of time; by studying to employ their riches for the glory of God, and the good of others; by keeping still in mind that God in Christ is the soul's portion, that the world cannot give them true comfort, that it cannot lengthen out their lives, nor profit them at the hour of death, Luke xii. 15. Psal. Ixii. 10. Prov. xi. 4. 2. Cor. ix. 7, 8. Q. How shall these be content and easy who are redvcedfrom a prosperous state to lo2v circumstances? A. By considering that God hath absolute dominion over us, hath right to do with his own what he will; that he taketh noth- ing from us, but what he gave, or rather lent to us for a time; that he is holy, just, and wise, and knows what state is fittest for U3. Q. What are the advantages of this grace of contentment? A. It produceth much inward peace, composeth the soul for duty, calms the spirit in adversity, and preserves from many temp- tations, snares, and sins, which those that are discontented fall into, such as fretting, murmuring, passion, bitterness, envy, lying, stealing, injustice, swearing rashly or falsely, and many oth- ers. , Q. What is meant by the right and charitable frame of spirit iov>:ard our neighbour and all that is his, which this command re- quireth ? A- It is to be kindly affcctioned to others, to wish their good, OF THE TENTH COMMANDMENT. 20t) to rejoice in their prosperity, and to be sorry for their afflictions, Rom. xii. 10, 15. 3 John ii. 3. Heb. xiii. 3. Quest. 81. What is forbidden in ike tenth com- mandment P ^ns. The tenth commandment forbiddeth all dis- contentment with our own estate, envying or grieving at the good of our neighbour, and all inordinate mo- tions and affections to any thing that is his. Q. After God had forbidden the sins of stealing and adulter!/ in the preceding commands, why doth he add, Thou shait not cov- et thy neighbour's house, nor his wife? A. To assure us of the spiritual extent and meaning of the hiw, and that it forbids the very first motions or risings of sin in the heart; the consideration whereof opened Paul's eyes to see his vileness through indwelling sin, though he was free of gross vices, Rom. vii. 7. " I had. not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Q. V^hat is the first sin which the answer mentions as here for- bidden? A. Discontentment with our estate, which is the sin of both rich and poor. Q. Whence doth men's discontent with their condition arise? A. From pride, love to the world, and distrust of God's provi- dence. Q. How doth it arise from pride ? A. Because it appears that they who are discontented with God's carving, have too high thoughts of themselves^ they either think they deserve better at God's hand, or that they could have ordered matters better for themselves than God hath done. Q. What are the evils of discontentment? A. Besides these mentioned a little before, it makes men un- tliankful for mercies, unfit for duties, uneasy to their relations and neighbours; it breeds strife, debates, law-suits, rebellions and murders; it robs men of the comfort of their lives, makes their crosses heavier, and provokes God to prolong and add to them. Q. What is the second sin here forbidden? A. Envy, which is a secret discontentedness at the prosperous state of others, or a grudging or grieving at their wealth, qualifi- cations or honours. Q. What are the evils of this sin of envy ? A, It is heart-murder, and a sin against all reason; yea, it is S 2 210 OF MAN^S INABILITY TO KEEP THE LAW. devilish to be a man's enemy for no other reason but because God is kind to him; it is a quarreling with God's wisdom and good- ness; it is rottenness to the bones: it produceth confusion and every evil work, Matth. xx. 15. Prov. xiv. 30. James iii, 16. Q. What are these inordinate motions and affections to. the things of our neighbour, which are here forbidden? A. All desires after these things which we cannot have by lawful means, or without wronging our neighbour; and all incli- nations to coveting, Col. iii. 5. Quest. 83. Is any man able perfectly to keep the commandments of God P Ans, No mere man, since the fall, is able in this life perfectly to keep the commandments of God, but doth daily break them in thought, word, and deed, Q. Why is it said in the answer, No mere man? A. To except the man Christ Jesus^ who did perfectly keep God's commands. Q. Was not Christ a mere man ? A. No; he was God and man. Q. Vi'hy is it said, since the fall? A, To except our first parents when in the estate of inno- cence, who then were able to keep God's commands perfect- Q. Why is it said, is able in this life? A. To except the saints in heaven, who are perfectly able to do it there. Q. Can no saint on earth attain to perfection in keeping God^s law? A. No; for" there is not a just man upon the earth, that doth good and sinneth not," Eccl. vii. 20. 1 Johni. 8, 10. Q. How comes it to be so? A, Because the best saints here are but renewed in part, and they have remains of corruption in them, which fight against the spiritual and renewed part. Gal. v. 17. And we find the best of scripture saints acknowledging this, and complaining of their imperfections, Job. ix. 2,3. Psal. xix. 18, and cxxx. 3. and cxliii. 2. Isa. Ixiv. 6. Dan. ix. 5. Rom. vii. 18, &c. Q, Are not Npah, Job and Hezckiah called perfect men? Gen. v\, 9, Job i. 8>» 2 Kings xx. 3, OF THE AGGRAVATIONS OF SIN. 211 A. That is not meant of an absolute perfection, or a perfection of degrees; but only of the perfection of sincerity, or a perfec- tion of parts,- as the body of an infant is reckoned perfect, though it be not come to the highest perfection. And that the scrip- ture dotli not mean absolute perfection, is evident from its recording the sins and imperfections of these very persons which are called perfect, Gen. ix. 21, Jobiii. 1, 3. 2 Chron. xxxii. 25. Q. What is meant by sincerity or a perfection of parts? A. A sincere or upright aiming at conformity to the will of God in all things, and a constant pressing on for farther degrees of holiness. Q. Doth not David say, Judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness? Psal. vii. 8. A. He speaks there, not of the righteousness of his person^ but of the righteousness of his cause, which he defended against his adversaries, and to which he appealed. Q. Doth not the apostle say. Whosoever is born of God doth BOt commit sin? 1 John iii. 9. A. The sense is. That the regenerate do not commit sin, as they once did, with delight, or full consent of the will; they do not allow sin to reign in them. But that they are not without sin, is evident from 1 John i. 8. Q. Why doth Christ require us to be perfect, Matth. v. 48. if we cannot attain to it? A. I. To let us know what he hath of risfht to demand of us. 2. To humble us, and drive us to Christ for perfect righteous- ness. 3. To teach us to desire, aim at, and press toward perfec- tion in holiness. Q. In 2chat respect are we guilty of breaking the commands of God? A. We are guilty of it daily, in thought, word, and deed. Q. Doth God look upon thouglUs of sin as breaches of his law ? A, Yes, Gen. viii. 21. Matth. v. 28, and xv. 19. Jer. iv. 14. Quest. 83. Jlreall transgressions of the law equal- ly heinous f Ans. Some sins in themselves, and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. Q, Are all sins equal f 212 OF THE AGGRAVATIONS OF SIN. A. No, some are more heinous than others. Q. What is it for a sin to be heinous? A. It is to be more hateful and oftensive to a holy God, than others are . Q . How doth it appear that some sins are more offensive to God than others! A. From these things; 1. The sin offering under the law was to be greater than the trespass offering. 2. Some sins are more severely threatened and punished than others. 3. Some sins are declared not capable ofpardon, Lev. ix. 3. Matt, xxiii. 14, andxii. 31. Q. Why is it said in the ansicer, that some sins are more hein- ous in the sight of God than others? A. To teach us by what rule we should judge of the greatness of sins, seeing many are apt to make light of that which is hei- nous before God, who certainly is the proper judge in this mat- ter. Q. What is it that makes some sins more heinous than others ? A. Some sins are more heinous in themselves, or in their own nature,- and some by reason of certain aggravations attending them. Q. What are these sins which are more heinous in their own nature than others? A. Sins against the first table of the law, or these which are committed more immediately against God, are more heinous than sins against the second table, or these which are immediately against man; as for instance, sacrilege is more heinous than theft, idolatry than adultery, blasphemy against God than defa- ming of our neighbour, 1 Sam. ii. 25. Q. Are not some of the sins against the first table more hein- ous than others? A. Yes; and we find atheism and idolatry marked out as sins of the greatest magnitude, Exod. v. 2. Jer. xliv. 4. Q. Are not some of the sins against the second table more heinous in their own nature than others ? A. Yes; murder is noted for a most heinous and crying sin; and so is oppression, especially of the widow and fatherless, Gen. iv. 10. Exod. xxii. 23. Q. Are heinous and crying sins capable of forgiveness? A. Yes, upon true faith and repentance, Isa. i. 18. 1 "Cor. vi. 11. Q. What are the only fountains of pardon ivhich sinners must look to? A. The free grace of God, and the meritorious blood of Jesus Christ, Luke vii. 42, Eph. i. 7. 1 John i. 7. OF THE AGGRAVATIONS OF SIN. 213 Q. What is the most heinous of all sins in the ivorld? A. The sin against the Holy Ghost, being a sin unto death, which is not forgiven, Matt. xii. 31. 1 John v. 16. Q. What is the sin against the Holy Ghost? A. It may be described, an apostacy, or turning from God and his truths and ways, after clear illumination and a fair pro- fession; and sinning wilfully with hatred, malice, and despite against Christ and his people, and continuing impenitent therein to the end. Matt. xii. 31, 32. Heb. vi. 4, 5 6, and x. 26, 29. Q. What are the aggravations which make some sins more heinous than others? A. They are the particular circumstances which do attend them, that make ihem greater than otherwise they would be. — And from scripture we find sins do receive their aggravations, 1. From the persons offending. 2. From the parties offended. 3. From the means against which sins are committed. 4. From the manner of committincr sin. 5. From the time of sinning. — 6. From the place where sins are committed. Q. How is sin aggravated f?'om the person offending? A. Sin is aggravated, if the person guilty be of age and expe- rience, or be eminent for his gifts, profession, station or office in the world; so that his example may encourage or draw others in- to sin, 2 Sam. xii. 14. I Kings xiv. 16. Mic.iii. 5. Rom.ii. 24. Gakii. 13. Q. Are not the sins o/" Christians moi'e heinous than the sins o/' heathens? A. Yes. Q. Are not the sins of these children who hate had a reli- gious education and example, more heinous than the sins of oth- ers? A. Yes. Q. How is sin aggravated from the parties offended ? A. Sin is aggravated, when it is committed immediately against God and his perfections, against Clirist and his grace; against the Holy Spirit and his operations; against men in em- inent stations, our superiors and friends to whom we are much obliged; against the souls of men, and these who are dear to Christ, Psal. li. 4. Rom. ii. 4. Matt. xxi. 38. Heb. xii. 25. Eph. iv. 30. Acts vii. 51. Numb. xii. 8. Jsa. iii. 5. Prov. XXX. 17. Psalm xii- 9. Ezek. xiii. 19. Matt, xviii. 6. 1 Cor. viii- 12. Q. How is sin aggravated from the means ag ainst which it is committed? A. Sin is much aggravated, when it is committed against a 214 OF THE DESERT OF SIN. clear and lively dispensation of gospel light and love, againsi the most gracious calls and offers, against the light of nature, and the convictions of conscience; against mercies, threatenings and judgments; against counsel and admonitions; against long pa- tience and good examples; against church-censures and civil punishments; against prayers and purposes, vows and covenants, Matt. xi. 21,23. John xv. 22. Rom. i. 26. Dan. v. 22.— Deut. xxxii. 6. Amos iv. 9. Jer.v.3. Prov. xxix. 1. Tit. iii. 10. Prov. xxiii. 55. Psalm Ixxviii. 36, 37. EccL v. 4 — Lev xxvi. 25. Q. How is sin aggravated from the manner of committing ii? A. When a man sins wilfully and without temptation, pre- sumptuously and without fear, deliberately and with contri- vance, obstinately and with resoluiion, impudently and with boasting, willingly and with delight, maliciously and with des- pite, customarily and with continuance, openly and with con- tempt. Likewise sin is much aggravated, when a man is guilty of doing that which he condemns in others, of relapsing into sin after repentance, of doing evil under a cloak of religion, or of teaching and encouraging others to sin, Jer. vi. 16. Numb. 15,30. Psal. xxxvi. 4, and liii 1. Prov. ii. 14- Isa- Ivii- 17. Zech. vii 11. 2 Pet. ii. 20. Rom. i. 32, and ii- 21- Rev. ii. 14. Q. How is sin aggravated from the tim.e of sinning? A. Sin becomes more heinous, when it is committed upon the Sabbath day, or when the person ought to have been at divine worship, or after solemn ordinances and engagements to be the Lord's, or in time of affliction, when the Lord is calling to hu- miliation, Ezek. xxiii. 33. jsa. xxiii. 12, 13, and Iviii. 3. — Numb. XXV. 6. 2 Chron. xxviii. 22. Isa, i. 1. Q. How may sinhe aggravated from the place of sinning ? A. When it is committed in a land of light, in a place dedica ted to the worship of God, in a place of gracious deliverances, or in a public place before others, who may thereby be tempted and ensnared, Isa. xxvi. 10. 1 Sam. ii. 2L Psalm cvi. 7. — 2 Sam. xvi. 22. Quest. 8L What doili every sin deserve P Ans. Every sin deserveth God's wrath aud curse, both ill this life, aiul that which is to come. Q. What is meant hy God''s wrath and curse due to sin? A. These dreadful punishments, which are the effects of llie TO ESCAPE THE WRATH & CURSE OF GOD. 215 sin-revenging justice of God, and the condemning sentence of his broken law, both here and hereafter. Q. Doth the hast sin deserve eternal punishment? A. Yes. Q. Hoic is that evident? A. Because every sin is an offence done against an infinitely holy and righteous God, and his just law; wherefore God's jus- tice doth demand infinite satisfaction for it, Gal. iii. 10. Rom. vi. 23. Ezek. xviii. 4. Q, How doth it appear that there is so much evil in every sin ? A. Because every sin in its own nature is a walking contrary to God, and a contemning of him who is infinitely good : it strikes against his sovereignty, his infinite power, his wisdom, his good- ness and holiness. Lev. xxvi. 40. Psalm x. 13. James ii. 10, 11. iCor. X. 22. Jer. ii. 5. Hab. i.l3. Q. Is there no ground for the Popish distinction of sins venial and mortal? A. No; for every sin in its own nature is mortal and deadly,- and though every sin be venial or pardonable through Christ, yet in itself it deserves eternal punishment, Rom. vi. 23. Deut. xxvii, 26. Rom. i. 18. Q. Is there not more evil in the least sin, than the sufferings of a finite creature can make atonement for? A. Yes; and therefore the sufferings of the damned, being never satisfactory must be eternal. Q. Cannot the least sin he expiated by any thing hut the blood of Christ? A. No, Heb. ix. 22. Quest. 85. What doth God require of uSj that ice may escape his wrath and curse due to us for sin P •Ans. To escape the wrath and curse of God due to us for sin, God requireth of us faith in Jesus Christ, repentance unto life, with the diligent use of all the outward means, whereby Christ communica- teth to us the benefits of redemption. Q. How Jcnoio you that the wrath of God is due to us for every sin? A' Because the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all unrighteousness of men, and every sin is a contempt of an in- finite God, Rom. i. 18, Psalm x. 13. 216 OF FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST. Q. Hath God revealed any way for escaping that wrath which is due to us for sin? A, Yes, namely, the way of faith and repentance, with a dili- gent use of all the means of grace. Q. Doth God require faith, repentance, and the use of means in order to satisfy for sin, and purchase salvation to us ? A. jNo; for that would 136 to make a saviour of our duties, and to render Christ's death in vain. Gal. ii. 21. Q. \yhy then doth God require these things of us? A. He requires them only as means for applying the purchase of Christ's death, and communicating the grace he hath merited unto us, Luke xxiv. 47. Rom. i. 16, 17. Lukexxi. 36. Q. Are faith, repentance, and other duties, the conditions of our salvation? A. Yes, they may be called so, if by conditions we understand no more but that they are necessary means of our salvation, as being appointed by God for applying the righteousness of Christ, which is the only meritorious and pleadable condition of our sal- vation. Q. Could not God save us by Chrises righteousness, without faith, repentance, or any other means? A. Whatever God might do in his absolute sovereignty, it ought to satisfy us, that God hath expressly revealed his will in this matter, and hath declared that it is through the use of these means only that he will communicate to us the benefits of re- demption; and this makes thenj absolutely necessary to all who expect salvation by Christ: and indeed it would not be for the honour of God to pardon or save any that go on in sin, and ne- glect Christ and his worship. Quest. 86. What is faith in Jesus Christ ? Jins, Faith in Jesus Christ is a saviug e;race, whereby we receive and rest upon him alone for sal- vation, as he is offered to us in the gospel. Q. Is not faith taken in different senses in scripturxi ? A. Yes; sometimes it is taken for the doctrine of faith, and sometimes for the grace of faith. Q. How is it otherwise distinguished? A, Into historical faith, the faith of miracles, and saving faith. Q. Is it saving faith for a man to believe that there is a God, or thai Jesus Christ is the Saviour of sinners, or thai the Bible is true? OF FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST. 217 A, No; for that is only historical faith, and the devils come this length, James ii. 19. Q. What is historical faith ? A. It is the assent of the understanding unto the truths re- vealed in the word, whereby a man believes and gives credit to them as he doth to the truth of a history. So did these, PJatt. xiii. 20. John ii. 23. Acts viii. 13, and xxvi. 27. Q. What more is there in saving faith than for a man to as- sent or give credit to divine testimony 1 A. If the assent be strong and full, it will indeed bring along with it the other acts of faith; that is, if a man not only assent to the things revealed in the gospel as true, but also firmly believe that they are as valuable and excellent as they are held forth to be, then he cannot but close with them. But if our assent doth only regard the truth of the things proposed, and not their good- ness and suitableness to us, it is not true and saving; for where faith is true, there is not only an assent of the mind to the verity of gospel truths, but also a consent of the heart unto them, as worthy of all acceptation, I Tim. i. 15. Rom. x. 10. Q. What is the faith of miracles 1 A. It is a peculiar confidence in the power of God, for produ- cing of miraculous effects, which many had in the first times of the gospel both actively and passively. Some had faith to heal, and others to be healed; and both these were sometimes found in persons void of saving faith, as in Judas and the unthankful lepers. Q. V^hy is faith in the answer called a grace? A. Because it is God's free gift, without any deserving in us. Eph. ii. 8. Q. Why is it called a saving grace? A. Because there is no salvation \vithout it, and all these who have it, shall be saved, Mark -jvi. 16. Q. How is it that faith doth save us? A, Not by virtue of any worth in faith, or of its being a deed or work of ours; but because faith is the grace that takes hold of the righteousness of Christ, by which only we are justified and saved. Q. Why then are we said to he J ustifed and saved hy faith? A. Because faith is the instrument and means of our justifica- tion and salvation. Q. Is not faith the fruit of Christ'^ s purchase? A. Yes; for it is given in the behalf of Christ to believe; he sends his Spirit to work faith, and hence he is called both the author and finisher of faith, Phil. i. 29. Eph. i. 17, 19. Heb. xii, 2. T 218 OF FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST. Q. What mean you by the righteousness of Christ, which is the matter and ground of our justijication before God? A. Christ's doing and dying, or all that he did and suffered for us as our Surety and cautioner. (See Quest. 33.) Q. Is it the same righteousness then, which wefnd sometimes called the righteousness of God, and sometimes the righteous' ness of faith? Rom. x. 3, 6. A. Ves, it is the very same: and it is called the righteous- ness of God, because it is of God-s devising and of God's per- forming, he being God that wrought it out for us. It is called the righteousness of faith, because it is by or through faith that the righteousness of Christ becomes ours; and hence we find it sometimes called the righteousness of God by faith. Phil. iii. 9. Q. What is the i^roper object of faith ? A. The general object of faith is the whole word of God; faith doth assent and consent to all its truths^ offers, commands, prom- ises, and threatenings; but the special object of faith is Christ and his Surety righteousness; for it is to this the penitent soul doth look as the only ground of its justification before God, 2 , Cor. li. 2. i| Q. What are the 'principal acts of justifying or samng faith ? A. There are two mentioned in the answer, namely, receiving and resting upon Christ. Q. What are we to understand by these two acts of faith? A. 1. To receive Christ, is to make choice of Christ, and embrace the offer of him as our Surety, and to consent with a hearty approbation to the gospel way of justification and salva- tion through Christ. 2. To rest upon Christ, is to adventure our all upon a crucified Jesus, by trusting in him alone, and layingf the full weight and stress of our souls and our whole sal- vation upon him, as the only foundation and ground stone laid in Zion for perishing sinners to rest on, Psal. ii. 12. 1 Pet. ii. 6. Q. "Why is faith said to rest upon Christ alone in the answer? A. To shew that sinners must not rest partly upon Christ, and ' partly upon their own doings for salvation, but upon Jesus Christ alone. Q. Doth not the souVs resting on Christ import that it is la- i den and burdened when it comes to Christ? A. Yes; for the soul is burdened, not only with the fears of wrath, but also with the guilt and pollution of sin, and with the power of indwelling corruption, which it longs to get rid of. Q. What is there in Christ to give rest to the burdened soul? A. There is in him a fulness of merit to expiate guilt, satisfy OF FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST. 219 justice, and obtain cleansing and purity to the soul, yea, there is a fulness of the Spirit in him, to renew and sanctify the natures of all who come to him. Q . Must not we by faith receive and rest on Christ iii all his Hirec offices, of prophet, priest and king. A. Yes, we must receive and rest on Christ, 1. As our priest, by renouncing all confidence in our own doings, and being con- tent to be justified by Christ's sacrifice and righteousness only. — 2. We must receive and rest upon Christ as our prophet, by re- nouncing all our carnal reasonings, and submitting to be taught by Christ, and to learn and believe according to the revelations of his word. 3. We must receive and rest upon Christ as our king, by renouncing our own wills and inclinations, and subjec- ting our whole man, hearts and wills, to Christ, to be inclined and ruled by his Spirit according to the directions of his word. Q. Hath saving faith any other acts besides these of recei- ving and resting upon Jesus Christ. A. Yes; for saving faith doth also receive and believe the whole word of God, and that because of the divine testimony; and ac- teth differently upon the several parts thereof, giving credit to its histories and prophecies, yielding obedience to its commands, trembling at its threatenings, and embracing its promises as in- fallibly true and certain: though still the receiving and resting upon Christ, as tendered in the gospel promises for salvation, be the chief and main acts of saving faith, John iv. 42. 1 John v. 10. Actsxxiv. 14. Rom. xvi. 26. Isa. Ixvi. 2. Heb. xi. 13. John i. 12. Isa. >xvi. 3. Q. For what ends are v^e by faith to receive and rest vpon Christ? A. For salvation; that is, for our complete salvation, not only from wrath, but from the filth, power and right of sin, and all the effects of it; so that it includes justification, sanctification, and eternal glory. Q. What is the ground vpon which we are warranted to re- ceive and rest upon Christ for salvation? A. Upon this, that he is offered to us in the gospel. Q, Unto whom is Christ offered in the gospel? A. Not to believers only, but to all who hear the gospel, evert the greatest sinners, Mark xvi. 15. Rom. x. 18. Isa. xlv. 12, and xlvi. 12. Q. By whom is Christ ojfcrcd to us in the gospel? A. By his Father, by himself, by his spirit, and by his min- isters, Malt. xxii. 2, 3. Isa. Ixv. 1. Rev. iii. 20, 22. Mark xvi. 15. 220 OF FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST. Q. Upon what terms is Christ offered unto us? A. He is offered, 1st, Freely, without money or price, or with- out regard to any good thing in us, but merely to our need, Isa. !v. 1, and Ixv. 1. 2d]y, Christ is offered to us wholly and undi- videdly, in all his offices, of prophet, priest and king; in all which we must receive him, as before mentioned. Q. Do any refuse Christ u-ho have him offered to them ? A. Yes; the most part do refuse him, John i. 1 1. Isa. liii. 1. Q. Who arc they that will be reckoned refusers of Christ? A. All who do not believe the report of the gospel, and em- brace tlie offer made unto them. Q. Is saving faith a sure proof of our being elected to cter- nallifc? A. Yes, and therefore it is called the faith of God's elect; and it is said, " As many as were ordained to eternal life, believed," Tit. i. 1. Actsxiii. 48. Q, Why is faith called p7'ecious in scripture? iPet. i. 7. 2 Pet. i. 1. A . Because it is honoured by God to be the instrument of our justification, to be the eye that discerns Christ, the hand that takes hold of him, and the bond of our union with him; it is the spring of the other graces, and doth set them a-work; it is the means of our spiritual life and supplies, and of our peace and joy, Rom. v. 1,2, 3, &c. Eph. iii. 17. Gal. ii. 20. Rom. XV. 13. Q. TT hy doth God put such rcf'pect upon faith above the other graces ? A. Because faith puts the highest honor upon his beloved Son, and approves of God's device of saving us through him; it strips the creature of all ground of boasting, and doth highly exalt ivee grace; it gives God all the glory of our salvation, which is most acceptable to him, Matt. xvii. 5. 1 Pet. ii. 7. Rom. iii. 27, and iv. 16. Eph.ii.7, 8. Q, By what marls may ice hnow if we have saving faith? A. True faith produceth a high esteem of Christ, and worketh by love; it softens and purifies the heart; it vents itself much in prayer and good works, and looses the heart from earthly things; I Pet. ii. 7.^ Gal. v. 6. Mark ix. 24. Acts xv. 9. Heb. iv. 14, 1^. James ii. 18. 2 Cor. iv. 18. Q. Have