S-cuoU THE WORKS OF AURELIUS AUGUSTINE, BISHOP OF HIPPO. A NEW TRANSLATION. REY. MARCUS DODS, D.D. VOL. IX. ON CHRISTIAN DOCTHINE ; THE ENCHIRIDION ; ON CATECHISING AND ON FAITH AND THE CREED. EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38, GEOKGE STREET. 187 3. PRINTED BY MURRAY AND GIBB, T. & T. CLAKK, EDIXBURGH. LONDON, .... HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. DUBLIN, .... JOHN ROBERTSON AND CO. NKW YORK, . . . SCRIBNER, WKLFORD, AND AR.MSTKONG. ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE; THE ENCHIRIDION. CranSlateO bt? PROFESSOR J. F. SHAW, LONDONDErJlY. ON CATECHISING; ON FAITH AND THE CREED Cran^latetJ bi) REY. S. D. S ALMOND, EDINBUEGH: T. & T. CLAEK, GEOEGE STEEET. 187 3. CONTENTS, PACK On Chkistiax Doctrine, ...... 1 The Enchiridion of Augustine, ..... 173 On the Catechising of the Uninstructed, ... 261 On Faith and the Creed, ...... 337 EXTRACT FEOM AUGUSTINE'S RETEACTATIONS llEFERRING TO THE BOOKS OX CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. (RETIIACT. LIB. II. CAP. IV.) '' "JT^INDING that \he books on Christian Doctrine were JL not finished, I thought it better to complete them before passing on to the revision of others. Accordingly, I completed the third book, which had been written as far as the place where a quotation is made from the Gospel about the woman who took leaven and hid it in three measures of meal till the whole was leavened.^ I added also the last book, and finished the whole work in four books [in the year 426] : the first three affording aids to the interpretation of Scripture, the last giving directions as to the mode of making known our interpretation. In the second book,^ I made a mistake as to the authorship of the book commonly called the Wisdom of Solomon. For I have since learnt that it is not a well- established fact, as I said it was, that Jesus the son of Sirach, who wrote the book of Ecclesiasticus, wrote this book also : on the contrary, I have ascertained that it is altogether more probable that he was not the author of this book. Again, when I said, ' The authority of the Old Testament is con- tained within the limits of these forty-four books,' '^ I used the phrase ' Old Testament ' in accordance with ecclesiastical usage. But the apostle seems to restrict the application of ^ Bk. iii. chap. 25. * (^'hj^p_ g. 3 Bk. ii. clinp. 8. Vlll EXTRACT FROM THE RETRACTATIONS. the name ' Old Testament' to the law which was given on [Mount Sinai/ And in what I said as to Saint Ambrose having, by his knowledge of chronology, solved a great difti- culty, when lie sliowed that Plato and Jeremiah were con- temporaries,^ my memory betrayed me. What that great bishop really did say upon this subject may be seen in the book which he wrote, ' On Sacraments or Philosophy.' " ^ i Oal. iv. 24. 2 Book. ii. chap. 28. See p. 05. ' This book is .imong the lost works of Ambrose. I TOPERTV Oi ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. P E E F A C E, SHOWING THAT TO TEACH EULES FOR, THE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE IS NOT A SUPERFLUOUS TASK. 1. r I IHEEE are certain rules for the interpretation of Scrip- JL ture wliicli I think might with great advantage be taught to earnest students of the word, that they may profit not only from reading the works of others who have laid open the secrets of the sacred writings, but also from themselves opening such secrets to others. These rules I propose to teach to those who are able and willing to learn, if God our Lord do not withhold from me, while I write, the thoughts He is wont to vouchsafe to me in my meditations on this subject. But before I enter upon this undertaking, I think it well to meet the objections of those who are likely to take exception to the work, or who would do so, did I not conciliate them beforehand. And if, after all, men should still be found to make objections, yet at least they will not prevail with others (over whom they might have influence, did they not find them forearmed against their assaults), to turn them back from a useful study to the dull sloth of ignorance. 2. There are some, then, likely to object to this work of mine, because they have failed to understand the rules here laid down. Others, again, will think that I have spent my labour to no purpose, because, though they understand the rules, yet in their attempts to apply them and to interpret Scripture by them, they have failed to clear up the point they wish cleared up ; and these, because they have received no assistance from this work themselves, will give it as their CHR. DOCT. A 2 ON cnmsTiAN doctkine. [preface. opinion that it can be of no use to anybody. There is a third class of objectors ^vho either really do understand Scripture well, or think they do, and who, because they know (or imagine) that tliey have attained a certain power of interpreting tlie sacred books without reading any directions of the kind that I propose to lay down here, will cry out that such rules are not necessary for any one, but that everything rightly done towards clearing up the obscurities of Scripture could be better done by the unassisted grace of God. 3. To reply briefly to all tliese. To those who do not understand what is here set do^\Ti, my answer is, that I am not to be blamed for their want of understanding. It is just as if they were anxious to see the new or tlie old moon, or some very obscure star, and I should point it out with my finger : if they had not sight enough to see even my fmger, they would surely have no right to lly into a passion with me on that account. As for those who, even though they know and understand my directions, fail to penetrate the meaning of obscure passages in Scripture, they may stand for those who, in the case I have imagined, are just able to see my finger, but cannot see the stars at which it is pointed. And so both these classes had better give up blaming me, and ^vay instead that God would grant them the sight of their eyes. For though I can move my finger to point out an object, it is out of my power to open men's eyes that they may see either the fact that I am pointing, or the object at which I point. 4. But now as to those who talk vauntingly of Divine Grace, and boast that they understand and can explain Scrip- ture without the aid of such directions as those I now pro- pose to lay down, and who think, therefore, that what I have undertaken to write is entirely superfluous. I would such persons could calm themselves so far as to remember that, however justly tliey may rejoice in God's great gift, yet it was from human teachers they themselves learnt to read. Now, they would hardly think it right that they should for that reason be held in contempt by tlie Egyptian monk Antony, a just and holy man, who, not being able to read himself, is said to have committed the Scriptures to memory through hearing them read by others, and by dint of wise meditation to have PREFACE.] OBJECTIONS TO THE WORK ANTICIPATED. 3 arrived at a thoroiigli understanding of tliem ; or by tliat bar- barian slave Christianus, of whom I have lately heard from very respectable and trustworthy witnesses, who, without any teaching from man, attained a full knowledge of the art of reading simply through prayer that it might be revealed to him ; after three days' supplication obtaining his request that he might read through a book presented to him on the spot by the astonished bystanders. 5. But if any one thinks that these stories are false, I do not strongly insist on them. For, as I am dealing with Christians who profess to understand the Scriptures without any directions from man (and if the fact be so, they boast of a real advantage, and one of no ordinary kind), they must surely grant that every one of us learnt his own language by hearing it constantly from childhood, and that any other language we have learnt, — Greek, or Hebrew, or any of the rest, — we have learnt either in the same way, by hearing it spoken, or from a human teacher. ISTow, then, suppose we advise all our brethren not to teach their children any of these things, because on the outpouring of the Holy Spirit the apostles immediately began to speak the language of every race ; and warn every one who has not had a like experience that he need not consider himself a Christian, or may at least doubt whether he has yet received the Holy Spirit ? No, no ; rather let us put away false pride and learn whatever can be learnt from man ; and let him who teaches another communi- cate what he has himself received without arro<^ance and without jealousy. And do not let us tempt Him in whom we have believed, lest, being ensnared by such wiles of the enemy and by our own perversity, we may even refuse to go to the churches to hear the gospel itself, or to read a book, or to listen to another reading or preaching, in the hope that we shall be carried up to the third heaven, " whether in the body or out of the body," as the apostle says,^ and there hear unspeakable words, such as it is not lawful for man to utter, or see the Lord Jesus Christ and hear the gospel from His own lips rather than from those of men. 6. Let us beware of such dangerous temptations of pride, » 2 Cor. xii. 2-4, 4 ON CIirJSTIAN DOCTRTXE. [PKEFACE. and kt iis ratlicr consider the fact that the Apostle Paul himself, although stricken down and admonished by the voice of God fi'om heaven, was yet sent to a man to receive the sacraments and be admitted into the Church ;^ and that Cornelius the centurion, although an angel announced to him that his prayers were heard and his alms had in remem- brance, was yet handed over to Peter for instruction, and not only received the sacraments from the apostle's hands, but was also instructed by him as to the proper objects of faith, hope, and love.^ And without doubt it was ijossillc to have done everything through the instrumentality of angels, but the con- dition of our race woidd have been much more degraded if Cod had not chosen to make use of men as the ministers of His word to their fellow-men. For how could that be true which is written, " The temple of God is holy, which temple ye are," ^ if God gave forth no oracles from His human temple, but communicated everything that He wished to be taught to men by voices from heaven, or through the ministration of angels ? Moreover, love itself, which binds men together in the bond of unity, would have no means of pouring soul into soul, and, as it were, mindini^j them one with another, if men never learnt anything from their fellow-men. 7. And we know that the eunuch who was reading Isaiah the prophet, and did not understand what he read, was not sent by the apostle to an angel, nor was it an angel who explained to him what he did not understand, nor was he inwardly illuminated by the grace of God Avithout the interposition of man ; on the contrary, at the suggestion of God, Philip, who (lid understand the prophet, came to him, and sat with him, and in human words, and with a human tongue, opened to him the Scriptures.* Did not God talk with Moses, and yet he, with great wisdom and entire absence of jealous pride, accepted the plan of his father-in-law, a man of an alien race, for ruling and administering the afliiirs of the great nation entrusted to him ?^ For Moses knew that a wise plan, in what- ever mind it might originate, was to be ascribed not to the man who devised it, but to Him who is the Truth, the un- changeable God. ^ AcUix. 3. 'Acts -X. ^ 1 Cor. iii. 17. ♦ AcU viii. 2G. 'Ex. xviii. 13. PREFACE.] INSTRUCTION STILL. NECESSARY. 5 8. In the last place, every one who boasts that he, through divine illumination, understands the obscurities of Scripture, though not instructed in any rules of interpretation, at the same time believes, and rightly believes, that this power is not his own, in the sense of originating with himself, but is the gifif of God. For so he seeks God's glory, not his own. But reading and understanding, as he does, without the aid of any human in- terpreter, why does he himself undertake to interpret for others? Why does he not rather send them direct to God, that they too may learn by the inward teaching of the Spirit without the help of man ? The truth is, he fears to incur the reproach : " Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou oughtest to have put my money to the exchangers." ^ Seeing, then, that these men teach others, either through speech or writing, what they under- stand, surely they cannot blame me if I likewise teach not only what they understand, but also the rules of interpretation they follow. For no one ought to consider anything as his own, except perhaps what is false. All truth is of Him who says, " I am the truth." ^ For what have we that we did not receive ? and if we have received it, why do we glory, as if we had not received it ? ^ 9. He who reads to an audience pronounces aloud the words he sees before him : he who teaches reading, does it that others may be able to read for themselves. Each, however, communicates to others what he has learnt himself. Just so, the man who explains to an audience the passages of Scripture he understands is like one who reads aloud the words before him. On the other hand, the man who lays down rules for interpretation is like one who teaches reading, that is, shows others how to read for themselves. So that, just as he who knows how to read is not dependent on some one else, when he finds a book, to tell him what is written in it, so the man who is in possession of the rules which I here attempt to lay down, if he meet with an obscure passage in the books which he reads, will not need an interpreter to lay open the secret to him, but, holding fast by certain rules, and following up certain indica- tions, w^ill arrive at the hidden sense without any error, or at least without falling into any gross absurdity. And so, although 1 Matt. XXV. 26, 27. 2 joij^ ^iv. 6. ^ 1 Cor. iv. 7. 6 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [PREFACE. it will sufTiciently appear in the course of the work itself that no one can justly oliject to this undertaking of mine, which has no other ohject than to be of service, yet as it seemed con- venient to reply at the outset to any who might make pre- liminary objections, such is the start I have thought good to make on the road I am obout to traverse in this book V, CHAP. I.] THE -WOEK DIVIDED INTO TWO PAKTS, BOOK F I E S T, CONTAINING A GENERAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECTS TREATED IN HOLY SCKIPTUEE. AEG U MEN T. THE AUTHOR DIVIDES HIS "WORK INTO TWO PARTS, ONE RELATING TO THE DIS- COVERY, THE OTHER TO THE EXPRESSION, OF THE TRUE SENSE OF SCRIPTURE. HE SHOWS THAT TO DISCOVER THE MEANING WE MUST ATTEND BOTH TO THINGS AND TO SIGNS, AS IT IS NECESSARY TO KNOW WHAT THINGS WE OUGHT TO TEACH TO THE CHRISTIAN PEOPLE, AND ALSO THE SIGNS OF THESE THINGS, THAT IS, WHERE THE KNOWLEDGE OF THESE THINGS IS TO BE SOUGHT. IN THIS FIRST BOOK HE TREATS OF THINGS, WHICH HE DIVIDES INTO THREE CLASSES, — THINGS TO BE ENJOYED, THINGS TO BE USED, AND THINGS WHICH USE AND ENJOY. THE ONLY OBJECT WHICH OUGHT TO BE ENJOYED IS THE TRIUNE GOD, WHO IS OUR HIGHEST GOOD AND OUR TRUE HAPPINESS. WE ARE PREVENTED BY OUR SINS FROM ENJOYING GOD ; AND THAT OUR SINS MIGHT BE TAKEN AWAY, "THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH," OUR LORD SUFFERED, AND DIED, AND ROSE AGAIN, AND ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN, TAKING TO HIMSELF AS HIS BRIDE THE CHURCH, IN WHICH WE RECEIVE REMISSION OF OUR SINS. AND IF OUR SINS ARE REMITTED AND OUR SOULS RENEWED BY GRACE, WE MAY AWAIT WITH HOPE THE RESURRECTION OF THE BODY TO ETERNAL GLORY ; IF NOT, WE SHALL BE RAISED TO EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT. THESE MATTERS RELATING TO FAITH HAVING BEEN EXPOUNDED, THE AUTHOR GOES ON TO SHOW THAT AIL OBJECTS, EXCEPT GOD, ARE FOR USE ; FOR, THOUGH SOME OF THEM MAY BE LOVED, YET OUR LOVE IS NOT TO REST IN THEM, BUT TO HAVE REFER- ENCE TO GOD. AND WE OURSELVES ARE NOT OBJECTS OF ENJOYMENT TO GOD : HE USES US, BUT FOR OUR OWN ADVANTAGE. HE THEN GOES ON TO SHOW THAT L V E — THE LOVE OF GOD FOR HIS OWN SAKE AND THE LOVE OF OUR NEIGHBOUR FOR GOD's SAKE — IS THE FULFILMENT AND THE END OF ALL SCRIPTURE. AFTER ADDING A FEW WORDS ABOUT HOPE, HE SHOWS, IN CONCLUSION, THAT FAITH, HOPE, AND LOVE ARE GRACES ESSENTIALLY NECESSARY FOR HIM WHO WOULD UNDERSTAND AND EXPLAIN ARIGHT THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. Chap. i. — The interpretation of Scripture depends on the discovery and enuncia- tion of the meaning^ and is to be undertaken in dependence on God's aid. l.'nnHEEE are two things on wliicli all interpretation of Scrip- JL ture depends: the mode of ascertaining the proper meaning, and the mode of making known the meaning when it is ascertained. \ We shall treat first of the mode of ascertainini:;, R ON CHRISTIAN doctrint:. [book t. next of the mode of making known, the meaning ; — a great and arduous undertaking, and one that, if difficult to carry out, it is, I fear, presumptuous to enter upon. And presumptuous it would undoubtedly be, if I were counting on my own strength ; but since my hope of accomplishing the work rests on Him who has already supplied me with many thoughts on this subject, I do not fear but that He will go on to supply what is yet wanting when once I have begun to use what He has already given. For a possession which is not diminished by being shared with others, if it is possessed and not shared, is not yet possessed as it ought to be possessed. " The Lord saith, " Who- soever hath, to him shall be given."^ He will give, then, to those who have ; that is to say, if they use freely and cheer- fully what they have received, He will add to and perfect His gifts. The loaves in the miracle were only five and seven in number before the disciples began to divide them among the hungry people. But when once they began to distribute them, though the wants of so many thousands were satisfied, they filled baskets with the fragments that were left.' Now, just as that bread increased in the very act of breaking it, so those thoughts which the Lord has already vouchsafed to me with a view to undertaking this work will, as soon as I begin to impart them to others, be multiplied by His grace, so that, in this very work of distribution in whicli I have engaged, so far from incurring loss and poVerty, I shall be made to rejoice in a marvellous increase of wealth. Chap, ii. — What a thing is, and ichat asigji. 2. All instruction is either about^ things or about signs ; but things are learnt by means of signs. I now use tlie word " thing " in a strict sense, to signify tliat which is never em- ployed as a sign of anything else : for example, wood, stone, cattle, and otlier things of tliat kind. Not, however, the wood which we read Moses cast into tlic bitter waters to make them sweet,^ nor the stone wliich Jacob used as a pillow,* nor the ram which Abraham offered up instead of his son;* for these, though tlu^y are things, are also signs of other things. There are signs of another kind, those which are » Matt. xiii. 12. * Matt. xiv. 17, etc., x.\. 31, etc. ' Ex. xv. 25. * Gen. xxviii. 11. » Gen. xxii. 13. CHAP. IV.] SOME THINGS AP.E FOR USE, SOME FOR EXJOYIMENT. 9 never employed except as signs : for example, words. No one nses words except as signs of something else ; and hence may be understood what I call signs : those things, to wit, wliich are used to indicate something else. Accordingly, every sign is also a thincj • for what is not a thincj is nothinf]^ at all. Every thing, however, is not also a sign. And so, in regard to this distinction between things and signs, I shall, when I speak of things, speak in such a way that even if some of them may be used as signs also, that will not interfere with the division of the subject according to which I am to discuss things first and signs afterwards. But we must carefully re- member that what we have now to consider about things is what they are in themselves, not what other things they are signs of. Chap. hi. — Some things are for use, some for enjoyment. 3. There are some things, then, which are to be enjoyed, others which are to be used, others still which enjoy and use. Those things which are objects of enjoyment make us happy. Those things which are objects of use assist, and (so to speak) support us in our efforts after happiness, so that we can attain the things that make us happy and rest in them. We our- selves, again, who enjoy and use these things, being placed among both kinds of objects, if we set ourselves to enjoy those which we ought to use, are hindered in our course, and some- times even led away from it ; so that, getting entangled in the love of lower gratifications, we lag behind in, or even altogether turn back from, the pursuit of the real and proper objects of enjoyment. Chap. iv. — Difference of use and enjoyment. 4. For to enjoy a thing is to rest with satisfaction in it for its own sake. To use, on the other hand, is to employ what- ever means are at one's disposal to obtain what one desires, if it is a proper object of desire ; for an unlawful use ought rather to be called an abuse. Suppose, then, we were wan- derers in a strange country, and could not live happily away from our fatherland, and that we felt wretched in our wander- ing, and wishing to put an end to our misery, determined to return home. We find, however, that we must make use of some mode of conveyance, either by land or water, in order to 10 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK I. reach that fatheiiand where our eDJoymeiit is to commence. But the beauty of the country through which we pass, and the very pleasure of the motion, charm our hearts, and turning these things wliich w^e ought to use into ohjects of enjoyment, we become unwilling to hasten the end of our journey ; and becoming engrossed in a factitious delight, our thoughts are diverted from that home whose delights would make us truly happy. Such is a picture of our condition in this life of mor- tality. We have wandered far from God ; and if we wish to return to our Father's home, this world must be used, not en- joyed, that so the invisible things of God may be clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made,^ — that is, that by means of what is material and temporary we may lay hold upon that which is spiritual and eternal Cn.vp. V. — The Trinity the true object of enjoyment. 5. The true objects of enjo}Tiient, then, are the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, who are at the same time the Trinity, one Being, supreme above all, and common to all who enjoy Him, if He is an object, and not rather the cause of all objects, or indeed even if He is the cause of all. For it is not easy to find a name that will suitably express so great excellence, unless it is better to speak in this way : The Trinity, one God, of whom are all things, through whom are all thincrs, in whom are all thinf^s.^ Thus the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and each of these by Himself, is God, and at the same time they are all one God ; and each of them by Himself is a complete substance, and yet they are all one substance. The Father is not the Son nor the Holy Spirit ; the Son is not the Father nor the Holy Spirit ; the Holy Spirit is not the Father nor tlie Son : but the Father is only Father, the Son is only Son, and the Holy Spirit is only Holy S])irit. To all three belong the same eternity, the same unchaugeableness, the same majesty, the same power. In the Father is unity, in the Son equality, in the Holy Spirit the harmony of unity and equality ; and these three attributes are all one because of the Fatlier, all e Epli. V. 29. CHAP. XXVII.] THE ORDER OF LOVE. 23 the beasts love themselves and their own bodies), — it only remained necessary to lay injunctions upon us in regard to God above us, and our neighbour beside us. " Thou shalt love," He says, " the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind ; and thou shalt love tliy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." ^ Thus the end of the command- ment is love, and that twofold, the love of God and the love of our neighbour. Now, if you take yourself in your entirety, — that is, soul and body together, — and your neigh- bour in his entirety, soul and body together (for man is made up of soul and body), you will find that none of the classes of things that are to be loved is overlooked in these two com- mandments. For though, when the love of God comes first, and the measure of our love for Him is prescribed in such terms that it is evident all other things are to find their centre in Him, nothincj seems to be said about our love for ourselves; yet when it is said, " Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy- self," it at once becomes evident that our love for ourselves has not been overlooked. Chap, xxvii. — The order of love. 28. Now he is a man of just and holy life who forms an unprejudiced estimate of things, and keeps his affections also under strict control, so that he neither loves what he ought not to love, nor fails to love what he ought to love, nor loves that more which ought to be loved less, nor loves that equally which ought to be loved either less or more, nor loves that less or more which ought to be loved equally. 'No sinner is to be loved as a sinner; and every man is to be loved as a man for God's sake; but God is to be loved for His own sake. And if God is to be loved more than any man, each man ought to love God more than himself. LikcAvise we ought to love another man better than our own body, because all things are to be loved in reference to God, and another man can have fellowship with us in the enjoyment of God, whereas our body cannot ; for the body only lives through the soul, and it is by the soul that we enjoy God. ' Matt. xxii. 37-40. 24 ox CHRISTIAN DOCTIIIXE. [BOOK I. Chap, xxviir. — IToxo we are to decide ichom to aid. 29. Further, all men are to be loved equally. But since you cannot do good to all, you are to pay special regard to those who, by the accidents of time, or place, or circumstance, are brought into closer connection with you. For, suppose that you had a great deal of some commodity, and felt bound to give it away to somebody who had none, and that it could not be given to more than one person ; if two persons presented themselves, neither of whom had either from need or relationship a greater claim upon you than the other, you could do nothing fairer than choose by lot to which you would give what could not be given to both. Just so among men : since you cannot consult for the good of them all, you must take the matter as decided for you by a sort of lot, according as each man happens for the time being to be more closely connected with you. Chap. xxix. — We are to desire and endeavour that alVmen may love Ood. 30. Now of aU who can with us enjoy God, we love partly those to whom we render services, partly those who render services to us, partly those who both help us in our need and in turn are helped by us, partly those upon whom we confer no advantage and from whom we look for none. "VVe ought to desire, however, that they should all join with us in loving God, and all the assistance that we either give them or accept from them should tend to that one end. For in the theatres, dens of iniquity though they be, if a man is fund of a par- ticular actor, and enjoys his art as a great or even as the very greatest good, he is fund of all who join with him in admira- tion of his favourite, not for their own sakes, but for the sake of him whom they admire in common ; and the more fervent he is in his admiration, the more he works in every way he can to secure new admirers fur him, and the more anxious he l)ecomes to show him to others ; and if he find any one com- paratively indifferent, he does all he can to excite liis interest by urging his favourite's merits : if, however, he meet with any one wlio opposes him, he is exceedingly displeased by such a man's contempt of his favourite, and strives in every way he can CHAP. XXX.] WflO IS OUR NEIGHBOUE ? 25 to remove it. Now, if this be so, what does it become us to do who live in the fellowship of the love of God, the enjoyment of whom is true happiness of life, to whom all who love Him owe both their own existence and the love they bear Him, con- cerning whom we have no fear that any one who comes to know Him will be disappointed in Him, and who desires our love, not for any gain to Himself, but that those who love Him may obtain an eternal reward, even Himself whom they love ? And hence it is that we love even our enemies. For we do not fear them, seeing they cannot take away from us what we love ; but we pity them rather, because the more they hate us the more are they separated from Him whom we love. For if they would turn to Him, they must of necessity love Him as the supreme good, and love us too as partakers with them in so great a blessing. Chap. xxx. — Wliether cmgels are to he rc.clconed our iieigUjours. 31. There arises further in this connection a question about angels. For they are happy in the enjoyment of Him whom we long to enjoy ; and the more we enjoy Him in this life as through a glass darkly, the more easy do we find it to bear our pilgrimage, and the more eagerly do we long for its termination. But it is not irrational to ask whether in those two command- ments is included the love of angels also. For that He who commanded us to love our neighbour made no exception, as far as men are concerned, is shown both by our Lord Himself in the Gospel, and by the Apostle Paul. For when the man to whom our Lord delivered those two commandments, and to whom He said that on these hang all the law and tlie prophets, asked Him, "And who is my neighbour?" Lie told him of a certain man who, going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, fell among thieves, and was severely wounded by them, and left naked and half dead.-^ And He showed him that nobody was neighbour to this man except him who took pity upon him and came forward to relieve and care for him. And the man who had asked the question admitted the truth of this when he was himself interrogated in turn. To whom our Lord says, "Go and do thou likewise;" teaching us that he is our neigh- 1 Luke X. 29, foU. 26 ON cnniSTiAN doctrine. [book i. boiir ^vhom it is our duty to help in liis need, or \vhom it Avoiild be our duty to help if he ^ve^e in need. AVhence it follows, that he whose duty it would be in turn to help us is our neighbour. For the name "neighbour" is a relative one, and no one can be neighbour except to a neighbour. And, again, who does not see that no exception is made of any one as a person to whom the offices of mercy may be denied when our Lord extends the rule even to our enemies ? " Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you."^ 32. And so also the Apostle Paul teaches when he says: "For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery. Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false wit- ness, Thou shalt not covet ; and if there be any other com- mandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely. Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour."^ Whoever then supposes that the apostle did not embrace every man in this precept, is com- pelled to admit, what is at once most absurd and most perni- cious, that the apostle thought it no sin, if a man wxre not a Christian or were an enemy, to commit adultery with his wife, or to kill him, or to covet his goods. And as nobody but a fool would say this, it is clear that every man is to be con- sidered our neighbour, because we are to work no ill to any man. 33. But now, if every one to whom we ought to show, or who ought to show to us, the offices of mercy is by right called a neighbour, it is manifest that the command to love our neigh- bour embraces the holy angels also, seeing that so great offices of mercy have been performed by them on our behalf, as may easily be shown by turning the attention to many passages of Holy Scripture. And on this gi'ound even (.Jod Himself, our Lord, desired to be called our neighbour. For our Lord Jesus Christ points to Himself under the figure of the man who brought aid to him who was lying half dead on the road, wounded and abandoned by the robbers. And the Psalmist says in liis prayer, " I behaved myself as though he had been my friend or brother."^ Lut as the Divine nature is of higher excellence than, and far removed above, our nature, the com- mand to love God is distinct from that to love our neighbour. 'Matt. V. 44. » lloin. .xiii. 9, 10. ' Ts. x.xxv. 1 4. CHAP. XXXII.] IN WHAT SENSE GOU USES- MAX. 27 For He shows us pity on account of His own goodness, but we show pity to one another on account of His ; — that is. He pities us that we may fully enjoy Himself; we pity one another that we may fully enjoy Him. Chap. xxxr. — God uses rather than enjoys us. 34. And on this ground, when we say that we enjoy only that which we love for its own sake , and that nothing is a true object of enjoyment except that which makes us happy, and that all other things are for use, there seems still to be some- thing that requires explanation. For God loves us, and Holy Scripture frequently sets before us the love He has towards us. In what way then does He love us ? As objects of use or as objects of enjoyment ? If He enjoys us, He must be in need of good from us, and no sane man will say that ; for all the good we enjoy is either Himself, or what comes from Him- self. And no one can be imorant or in doubt as to the fact o that the lio'ht stands in no need of the j^^litter of the thinsjs it has itself lit up. The Psalmist says most plainly, " I said to the Lord, Thou art my God, for Thou needest not my good- ness." -^ He does not enjoy us then, but makes use of us. For if He neither enjoys nor uses us, I am at a loss to dis- cover in what way He can love us. Chap, xxxii. — In u-7iat ivay God uses man. 35. But neither does He use after our fashion of using. For wdien we use objects, we do so with a view to the full enjoyment of the goodness of God. God, however, in His use of us, has reference to His own goodness. For it is because He is good we exist ; and so far_as^ we truly exist we are good. And, further, because He is also just, we cannot with im- punity be evil ; and so far as we are evil, so far is our existence less complete. Now He is the first and supreme existence, who is altogether unchangeable, and who could say in the fullest sense of the words, " I am that I am," and " Thou shalt say to them, I am hath sent me unto you ; " ^ so tliat all other things that exist, both owe their existence entirely to Him, and are good only so far as He has given it to them to 1 Ps. xvi. 2 (LXX.). 2Ex. iii. 14. 28 ON cnrjsTTAN doctrtxr [book I. be so. That use, then, wliicli God is said to make of us has no reference to His own advantage, but to ours only ; and, so far as He is concerned, has reference only to His goodness. When we take pity upon a man and care for liini, it is for his advantage ■vve do so ; but somehow or other our own advantage follows by a sort of natural consequence, for God does not leave the mercy we show to him who needs it to go without reward. Now this is our highest reward, that we should fully enjoy Him, and that all who enjoy Him should enjoy one another in Him. Chat, xxxiii. — In what icay man should he enjoyed. 3G. For if we find our happiness complete in one another, we stop short upon the road, and place our hope of happiness in man or angel. Now the proud man and the proud angel arrogate this to themselves, and are glad to have the hope of others fixed upon them. But, on the contrary, the holy man and the holy angel, even when we are weary and anxious to stay with them and rest in them, set themselves to recruit our energies with the provision which they have received of God for us or for themselves ; and then urge us thus refreshed to go on our way towards Him, in the enjoyment of whom we find our common happiness. For even the apostle exclaims, " Was Paul crucified for you ? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul ? " ^ and again : " Neither is he that planteth anything, neither he that watereth ; but God that giveth the increase." ^ And the angel admonisheth the man who is about to worship him, that he should rather worship Him who is his Master, and under whom he himself is a fellow-servant.^ 37.' But when you have joy of a man in God, it is God rather than man that you enjoy. For you enjoy Him by whom you are made happy, and you rejoice to have come to Him in whose presence you place your liope of joy. And accordingly, Paul says to Philemon, " Yea, brother, let me have joy of tliee in the Lord." * For if he had not added " in the Lord," but had only said, " Let me have joy of thee," he would have implied that he fixed his hope of happiness upon him, although even in the immediate context to " enjoy " is used in the sense of to " use with delight." For when the ' ] Cur. i. 13. ' 1 Cor. iii. 7. ' Kcv. xi.\. 10. * Philcm. 20. CHAP. XXXIV.] CHEIST THE WAY AND THE END. 29 tiling that we love is near us, it is a matter of course that it should bring delight with it. And if you pass beyond this delight, and make it a means to that which you are per- manently to rest in, you are using it, and it is an abuse of language to say that you enjoy it. But if you cling to it, and rest in it, finding your happiness complete in it, then you may be truly and properly said to enjoy it. And this we must never do except in the case of the Blessed Trinity, who is the Supreme and Unchangeable Good. Chap, xxxiv. — Christ the first ivoy to God. 38. And mark that even when He who is Himself the Truth and the Word, by whom all things were made, had been made llesh that He might dwell among us, the apostle yet says : " Yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we Him no more." ^ For Christ, desiring not only to give the possession to those' who had completed the journey, but also to be Himself the way to those who were just setting out, determined to take a fleshly body. Whence also that expression, "The Lord created ^ me in the beginning of His way," ^ that is, that those who wished to come might begin their journey in Him. The apostle, therefore, althougli still on the way, and following after God who called him to the reward of His heavenly calling, yet forgetting those things which were behind, and pressing on towards those things which were before,'^ had already passed over the beginning of the way, and had now no further need of it ; yet by this way all must commence their journey who desire to attain to the truth, and to rest in eternal life. For He says : " I am the way, and the truth, and the life ; " ^ that is, by me men come, to me they come, in me they rest. For when we come to Him, we come to the Father also, because through an equal an equal is known ; and the Holy Spirit binds, and as it were seals us, so that we are able to rest permanently in the supreme and un- changeable Good. And hence we may learn how essential it is that nothing should detain us on the way, when not even our Lord Himself, so far as He has condescended to be our way, 1 2 Cor. V. 16. 2 A. V. jjossessed. ^ Pi'ov. viii. 22, * Comp. Phil. iii. 13. ^ John xiv. 6. 30 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK I. is willing to detain iis, but wishes us rather to press on ; and, instead of weakly clinging to temporal things, even though these have been put on and worn by Him for our salvation, to pass over them quickly, and to struggle to attain unto Him- self, who has freed our nature from the bondage of temporal things, and has set it down at the right hand of His Father. Chap, xxxv. — The fulfilment and end of Scripture is the love of God and our neighbour. 39. Of all, then, that has been said since we entered upon tlie discussion about things, this is the sum : that we should clearly understand that the fulfdment and the end of the Law, and of all Holy Scripture, is the love of an object which is to Ije enjoyed, and the love of an object which can enjoy that other in fellowship with ourselves. For tliere is no need of a command that each man should love himself. The whole temporal dispensation for our salvation, therefore, was framed by the providence of God that we might know this truth and be able to act upon it; and we ought to use that dispensa- tion, not with such love and deli'dit as if it were a f^ood to rest in, but with a transient feelin!]^ rather, such as we have towards the road, or carriages, or other things that are merely means. Perhaps some other comparison can be found that will more suitably express the idea that we are to love the things by which we are borne only for the sake of that towards which we are borne. CiiAi'. xxxwi.— That interpretation of Scripture ichich builds rts up in love is not perniciously deceptive nor mendacious, even though it be faulty. The inter- preter, however, should be corrected. 40. Wioever, then, thinks that he understands the Holy Scriptures, or any part of them, but puts such an interpreta- tion upon them as does not tend to build up tliis tw^ofold love of God and our neiglibour, does not yet imderstand tliem as he might. H', on tlie otlier hand, a man draws a meaning from them that may be used for the building up of love, even thougli lie does not happen upon tlie pre- cise meaning which the author whom he reads intended to express in that place, liis error is not pernicious, and he is w] lolly clear from the charge of deception. For there is involved in deception the iiiltiilioii to say what is false; and CHAP. XXXVII.] EDIFYING MISINTERPRET ATIONS. 31 we find plenty of people who intend to deceive, but nobody who wishes to be deceived. Since, then, the man who knows practises deceit, and the ignorant man is practised upon, it is quite clear that in any particular case the man who is deceived is a better man than he who deceives, seeing that it is better to suffer than to commit injustice. Now every man who lies commits an injustice ; and if any man thinks that a lie is ever useful, he must think that injustice is sometimes useful. For no liar keeps faith in the matter about which he lies. He wishes, of course, that the man to whom he lies should place confidence in him ; and yet he betrays his confi- dence by lying to him. Now every man who breaks faith is unjust. Either, then, injustice is sometimes useful (wliich is impossible), or a lie is never useful. 41. Whoever takes another meaning out of Scripture than the writer intended, goes astray, but not through any false- hood in Scripture. Nevertheles s, as I was going to say, if his mistaken interpretation tends to build up love, which is the end of the commandment, he goes astray in much the same way as a man who by mistake quits the high road, but yet reaches through the fields the same place to which the road leads. He is to be corrected, however, and to be shown how much better it is not to quit the straight road, lest, if he get into a habit of going astray, he may sometimes take cross roads, or even go in the wrong direction altogether. Chap, xxxvii. — Dangers of mistaken interpretation. For if he takes up rashly a meaning which the author whom he is reading did not intend, he often falls in with other statements which he cannot harmonize with this meanincr. And if he admits that these statements are true and certain, then it follows that the meaning he had put upon the former passage cannot be the true one : and so it comes to pass, one can hardly tell how, that, out of love for his own opinion, he begins to feel more angry with Scripture than he is with himself And if he should once permit that evil to creep in, it will utterly destroy him. " For we walk by faith, not by sight."/ Now faith will totter if the authority of Scripture 1 2 Cor. V. 7. 32 ON CHKISTIAN DOCTHINE. [BOOK L begin to shake. And then, if faith totter, love itself will grow cold. For if a man has fallen from faith, he must necessarily also faU from love ; for he cannot love what he does not believe to exist. But if he both believes and loves, then through good works, and through diligent attention to the precepts of morality, he comes to hope also that he shall attain the object of his love. And so these are the three things to which all kno wled ge and all prophecy are subser- vient : faith, hope , love. Chap, xxxviii.— Zore never fallcth. 42. But sight shall displace faith ; and hope shall be swalljowed up in that perfect bliss to which we shall come : love, on the other hand, shall wax greater when these others fail. For if we love by faith that which as yet we see not, how much more shall we love it when we begin to see ! And if we love by hope that which as yet we have not reached, how much more shall we love it when we reach it ! For there is this great difference between things temporal and things eternal, that a temporal object is valued more before we pos- sess it, and begins to prove worthless the moment we attain it, because it does not satisfy the soul, which has its only true and sure resting-place in eternity : an eternal object, on the other hand, is loved with greater ardour when it is in posses- sion than while it is still an object of desire, for no one in his longing for it can set a higher value on it than really belongs to it, so as to think it comparatively wortliless when he finds it of less value than he thought; on the contrary, however high the value any man may set upon it when he is on his way to possess it, he will find it, when it comes into his po.ssession, of higher value still. Chap, xxxix. — lie xcho is mature in faith, hope, and love, needs Scripture no lonijer, 43. And thus a man who is resting upon faith, hope, and love, and who keeps a iirm hold upon these, does not need the Scriptures except for the purpose of instructing others. Accordingly, many live without copies of the Scriptures, even in solitude, on tlie strength of tliese throe graces. So that in their case, I think, the saying is already fuHilled : CHAP. XL.] THE SPirJT IN WHICH WE SHOULD EEAD SCKIPTUEE. 33 '' Whether there be prophecies, they shall fail ; whetlier there be tongues, they shall cease ; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away." ^ Yet by means of these instruments (as they may be called), so great an edifice of faith and love has been built up in them, that, holding to what is perfect, they do not seek for what is only in part perfect — of course, I mean, so far as is possible in this life ; for, in comparison with the future life, the life of no just and holy man is perfect here. Therefore the apostle says : " Now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity:"^ because, when a man shall have reached the eternal world, while the other two graces will fail, love will remain greater and more assured. Chap, xl. — JVJiat manner of reader Scripture demands. 44.' And, therefore, if a man fully understands that " the end of the commandment is charity, out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned," ^ and is bent >upon making all his understanding of Scripture to bear upon these three graces, he may come to the interpretation of these books with an easy mind. I For while the apostle says " love," he adds " out of a pure heart," to provide against anything being loved but that which is worthy of love. And he joins with this " a good conscience," in reference to hope ; for, if a man has the burthen of a bad conscience, he despairs of ever reaching that which he believes in and loves. And in the third place he says : " and of faith unfeigned." Tor if our faith is free from all hypocrisy, then we both abstain from loving what is unworthy of our love, and by living uprightly we are able to indulge the hope that our hope shall not be in vain. For these reasons I have been anxious to speak about the objects of faith, as far as I thought it necessary for my present purpose ; for much has already been said on this subject in other volumes, either by others or by myself. And so let this be the end of the present book. In the next I shall discuss, as far as God shall give me light, the subject of signs. 1 1 Cor. xiii. 8. ^ i q^j,. xiii. 13. ^l Tim. i. 5. CHU. DOCT. C 34 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. LOOK S E C X D. ARGUMENT. HAVING COMrLETED HIS EXPORITION OF THINGS, THE AUTHOn NOW TEOCEEDS TO DISCUSS THE SUBJECT OF SIGNS. HE FIRST DEFINES WHAT A SIGN IS, AND SHOWS THAT THERE ARE TWO CLASSES OF SIGNS, THE NATURAL AND THE CONVENTIONAL. OF CONVENTIONAL SIGNS (WHICH ARE THE ONLY CLASS HERE NOTICED), WORDS ARE THE MOST NUMEROUS AND IMPORTANT, AND ARE THOSE WITH WHICH THE INTERPRETER OF SCRIPTURE IS CHIEFLY CONCERNED. THE DIFFICULTIES AND OBSCURITIES OF SCRIPTURE SPRING CHIEFLY FROM TWO SOURCES, UNKNOWN AND AMBIGUOUS SIGNS. THE PRESENT BOOK DEALS ONLY WITH UNKNOWN SIGNS, THE AMBIGUITIES OF LANGUAGE BEING RESERVED FOR TREATMENT IN THE NEXT BOOK. THE DIFFICULTY ARISING FROM IGNORANCE OF SIGNS IS TO BE REMOVED BY LEARNING THE GREEK AND HEBREW LANGUAGES, IN WHICH SCRIPTURE IS WRITTEN, BY COMPARING THE VARIOUS TRANSLATIONS, AND BY ATTENT)ING TO THE CONTEXT. IN THE INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE EXPRESSIONS, KNOWLEDGE OF THINGS IS AS NECESSARY AS KNOWLEDGE OF WORDS ; AND THE VARIOUS SCIENCES AND ARTS OF THE HEATHEN, SO FAR AS THEY ARE TRUE AND USEFUL, MAY BE TURNED TO ACCOUNT IN REMOVING OUIl IGNOR- ANCE OF SIGNS, WHETHER THESE BE DIRECT OR FIGURATIVE. WHILST EX- POSING THE FOLLY AND FUTILITY OF MANY HEATHEN SUPERSTITIONS AND PRACTICES, THE AUTHOR POINTS OUT HOW ALL TI^AT IS SOUND ANT) USEFUL IN THEIR SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY MAY BE TURNED TO A CHRISTIAN USE. AND IN CONCLUSION, HE SHOWS THE SPIRIT IN WHICH IT BEHOVES US TO ADDRESS OURSELVES TO THE STUDY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE SACRED BOOKS. Chap. i. — Signs, their nature and variety. 1. 4 S wlien I was writing about things, I introduced the X\. subject with a warning against attending to any- thing but what they are in themselves,^ even though they are signs of something else, so now, when I come|nJt^ turn to dis- cuss the su1)ject of signs, I lay down this direction^ not to attend to what they are in themselves, but to the fa ct that they are signs, that is, to what they sig nify. For a sign is a thing wliicli, over and above the impression it makes on the senses, causes something else to come into the mind as a consequence of itself : as when we see a footprint, we conclude that an animal wliose footprint this is has passed by ; and when we see smoke, we » See Book i. 2. CHAP. II.] THE KINDS OF SIGNS. 35 know that there is fire beneath ; and when we hear the voice of a living man, we think of the feeling in his mind ; and when the trumpet sounds, soldiers know that they are to advance or retreat, or do whatever else the state of the battle requires. 2. Now some signs are natural, others conventional. Natural signs are those which, apart from any intention or desire of using them as signs, do yet lead to the knowledge of something else, as, for example, smoke when it indicates fire. For it is not from any intention of making it a sign that it is so, but through attention to experience we come to know that fire is beneath, even when nothing but smoke can be seen. And the footprint of an animal passing by belongs to this class of signs. And the countenance of an angry or sorrowful man indicates the feeling in his mind, independently of his will: and in the same way every other emotion of the ^ind is betrayed by the tell-tale countenance, even though we do nothing with the intention of making it known. This class of signs, however, it is no part of my design to discuss at present. But as it comes under this division of the subject, I could not altogether pass it over. It will be enough to have noticed it thus far. Chap. ii. — Of the hind of signs we are now concerned with. 3. Conventional sims, on the other hand, are those which living beings mutually exchange for the purpose of showing, as well as they can, the feelings of their minds, or their percep- tions, or their thoughts. Nor is there any reason for giving a sign except the desire of drawing forth and conveying into another's mind what the Q,iver of the sim has in his own mind. We wish, then, to consider and discuss this class of signs so far as men are concerned with it, because even the signs which have been given us of God, and which are con- tained in the Holy Scriptures, were made known to us through men — those, namely, who wrote the Scriptures. The beasts, too, have certain signs among themselves by which they make known the desires in their mind. For when the poultry-cock has discovered food, he signals with his voice for the hen to run to him, and the dove by cooing calls his mate, or is called by her in turn ; and many signs of the same kind are matters of common observ^ation. Now whether these signs, like the 3 G ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. expression or tlie cry of a man in grief, follow the movement of the mind instinctively and apart from any purpose, or wliether they are really used with the purpose of signification, is another question, and does not pertain to the matter in hand. And this part of the subject I exclude from the scope of this work as not necessary to my present object. CiiAr. HI. — Among signs, tcords hold tlie chief place. 4. Of the signs, then, by which men communicate their thoughts to one another^ some relate to the sense of sight, some to that of hearing, a very few to the other senses. For, when we nod, we give no sign except to the eyes of the man to whom we wish by this sign to impart our desire. And some convey a great deal by the mpjbion of the hands : and actors by movements of all their limbs give certain signs to the initiated, and, so to speak, address their conversation to the eyes : and the military standards and flags convey through the eyes the will of the commanders. And all these signs are as it were a kind of visible words. The signs that address them- selves to the ear are, as I have said, more numerous, and for the most part consist of words. For though the bugle and the flute and the lyre frequently give not only a sweet but a signifi- cant sound, yet all these signs are very few in number com- pared with words. For among men words have obtained far and away the chief place as a means of indicating the thoughts of the mind. Our Lord, it is true, gave a sign through the odour of the ointment which was poured out upon His feet;^ and in the sacrament of His body and blood He signified His will through the sense of taste ; and when by touching the hem of His garment the woman was made whole, the act was not wanting in significance.^ But the countless multitude of the signs through which men express their thoughts consist of words. For I have been able to put into words all those signs, the various classes of whicli I liave briefly touclied upon, but I could by no efl'ort express words in terms of those signs. Chat. iv. — Origin of irriting. 5. r>ut because words pass away as soon as they strike > John xii. 3-7 ; Mark xiv. 8. « Matt. ix. 20. CHAP. VI.] THE OBSCURITIES OF SCRIPTURE. 37 upon the air, and last no longer than their sound, men have by means of letters formed si^ns of words. Thus the sounds of the voice are made visible to the eye, not of course as sounds, but by means of certain signs. It has been found impossible, however, to make those signs commqn^to all nations owing to the sin of discord among men^ 'svhicli sjDrings from every man trying to snatch the chief place for himself. And that celebrated tower which was built to reach to heaven was an indication of this arrogance of spirit ; and the ungodly men concerned in it justly earned the punishment of having not their minds only, but their tongues besides, thrown into confusion and discordance.^ Chap. v. — Scripture translated into various languages. 6. And hence it happened that even Holy Scripture, which brings a remedy for the terrible diseases of the human will, being at first set forth in one language, by means of which it could at the fit season be disseminated through the whole world, was interpreted into various tongues, and spread far and wide, and thus became known to the nations for their salvation. And in reading it, men seek nothing more than to find out the thought and will of those by whom it was written, and through these to find out the will of God, in accordance with which they believe these men to have spoken. CuAP. VI. — Use of tlce obscurities in Scripture wJiich arise from its figurative language. 7. But hasty and careless readers are led astray by many and manifold obscurities and ambiguities, substitutino- one meaning for another ; and in some places they cannot hit upon even a fair interpretation. Some of the expressions are so obscure as to shroud the meaning in the thickest darkness. And I do not doubt that all this was pivinely arranged for the purpose of subduing pride by toil, and of preventing a feeling of satiety in the intellect, which generally holds in small esteem what is discovered without difficulty. / For why is it, I ask, that if any one says that there are holy and just men whose life and conversation the Church of Christ uses as a means of redeeming those who come to it from all kinds of superstitions, and making them through their imitation of * Gen. xL 38 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. good men members of its own body; men who, as good and true servants of God, liave come to tlie baptismal font laying down the burdens of the world, and who rising thence do, through the implanting of the Holy Spirit, yield the fruit of a twofold love, a love, that is, of God and tlieir neighbour ; — how is it, I say, that if a man says this, he does not please his hearer so much as when he draws the same meaning from that passage in Canticles, where it is said of the Church, wlien it is being praised under the figure of a beautiful woman, " Thy teeth are like a flock of sheep that are shorn, which came up from the washing, whereof every one bears twdns, and none is barren among them " ? ^ Does the hearer learn anything more than when he listens to the same thought expressed in the plainest language, without the help of this figure ? And yet, I don't know why, I feel greater pleasure in contemplating holy men, when I view them as the teeth of the Church, tearing men away from their errors, and bringing them into the Church's body with all their harshness softened down, just as if they had been torn off and masticated by the teeth. It is w^ith the greatest pleasure, too, that I recognise them under the figure of sheep that have been shorn, laying down the burthens of the \vorld like fleeces, and coming up from the washing, i.e. from baptism, and all bearing twins, i.e. the twin commandments of love, and none among them barren in that holy fruit. ^ 8. But why I view them with greater delight under that aspect than if no such figure were drawn from the sacred books, though the fact would remain the same and tlie knowledge the same, is another question, and one very difficult to answer. Nobody, however, has any doubt about the facts, both that it ■ is pleasanter in some cases to have knowledge communicated through figures, and that what is attended with difticulty in the seeking gives greater pleasure in the finding. For those who seek but do not find suffer from hunger. Those, again, who do not seek at all because they liave what tliey require just beside them often grow languid from satiety. Now weakness from cither of these causes is to be avoided. Accordingly the Holy Spirit has, with admirable wisdom and care for our welfare, so arranged- the Holy Scriptures as by the plainer passages to satisfy our » Cant. iv. 2. CHAP, til] the steps TO AVISDOM. 39 liuno-er, and by the more obscure to stimulate our appetite. For almost nothing is dug out of those obscure passages which may not be found set forth in the plainest language elsewhere. Chap. vii. — Steps to wisdom: First, fear ; second, piety; third, Tcnowledge ; fourth, resolution; ffth, counsel; sixth, x>uriJication of heart ; seventh, stop or termination, loisdom. 9. First of all, then, it is necessary that we should be led by the fear of God to seek the knowledge of His will, what He commands us to desire and what to avoid. Now this fear will of necessity excite in us the thought of our mortality and of the death that is before us, and crucify all the motions of pride as if our flesh were nailed to the tree. Next it is necessary to have our hearts subdued by ^926^3/, and not to run in the face of Holy Scripture, whether when understood it strikes at some of our sins, or, when not understood, we feel as if we could be wiser and give better commands ourselves. We must rather think and believe that whatever is there written, even though it be hidden, is better and truer than anything we could devise by our own wisdom. 1 0. After these two steps of fear and piety, we come to the third step, knowledge, of which I have now undertaken to treat. For in this every earnest student of the Holy Scriptures exercises himself, to find nothing else in them but that God is to be loved for His own- sake, and our neighbour for God's sake ; and that God is to be loved with all the heart, and with all the soul, and with all the mind, and one's neighbour as one's self — that is, in such a way that all our love for our neighbour, like all our love for ourselves, should have reference to God.^ And on these two commandments I touched in the previous book when I was treating about things.^ It is necessary, then, that each man should first of all find in the Scriptures that he, through being entangled in the love of this world — i.e. of tem- poral things — has been drawn far away from such a love for God and such a love for his neighbour as Scripture enjoins. Then that fear which leads him to think of the judgment of God, and that piety whicli gives him no option but to believe in and submit to the authority of Scripture, compel him to bewail his condition. For the knowledge of a good hope makes ^ Comp. Matt. xxii. 37-40. 2 g^g 230^]^ j_ c. 22. 40 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK 11 a man not boastful, but sorrowful. And in tliis frame of mind he implores witli unremitting ])rayers the comfort of the Divine help that he may not be overwhelmed in despair, ancl so he gradually comes to the fourth step, — that is, strength and resohUion} — in which he hunc^ers and thirsts aft<'r righteous- ness. For in this frame of mind he extricates himself from every form of fatal joy in transitory things, and turning away from these, fixes his affection on things eternal, to wit, the un- changeable Trinity in unity. 11. And when, to the extent of his power, he has gazed upon this oT)ject shining from afar, and has felt that owing to the weakness of his sight he cannot endure that matchless light, then in the fifth step — that is, in the counsel of compas- sion^ — he cleanses his soul, which is violently agitated, and disturbs him with base desires, from the filth it has contracted. And at this stage he exercises himself diligently in the love of his neighbour ; and when he has reached the point of loving his enemy, full of hopes and unbroken in strength, he mounts to the sixth step, in which he^jmrifics the eye itself ^chich can see Gocl^ so far as God can be seen by those who as far as pos- sible die to this world. For men see Him just so far as they die to this world ; and so far as they live to it they see Him not. But yet, although that light may begin to appear clearer, and not only more tolerable, but even more delightful, still it is only through a glass darkly that we are said to see, because we walk by faith, not by sight, while w^e continue to wander as strangers in tliis world, even though our conversation be in heaven.* And at this stage, too, a man so purges the eye of his affections as not to place his neighbour before, or even in comparison with, the truth, and therefore not himself, be- cause not him whom he loves as himself. Accordingly, that holy man will be so single and so pure in heart, that he will not step aside from the truth, either for the sake of pleasing men or with a view to avoid any of the annoyances whicli beset this life. Such a son ascends to ivisdom, which is the seventh and last step, and wliich he enjoys in peace and tran- quillity. For the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.*^ ' Fortitwlo. ' Consilium raiser kordice. ' Matt. v. 8. * 1 Cor. xiii. 12; 2 Cor. v. 7. ^ pg ^xi. 10. CHAP. VIII.] THE CANONICAL BOOKS. 41 From that beginning, then, till we reach wisdom itself, our way is by the steps now described. Chap. viii. — The canonical boohs. 12. But let US now go back to consider the third step here mentioned, for it is about it that I have set myself to speak and reason as the Lord shall grant me wisdom. The most skilful interpreter of the sacred writings, then, will be he who in the first i^lace has read them all and retained them in his knowledge, if not yet with full understanding, still with such knowledge as reading gives, — those of them, at least, that are called canonical. For he will read the others with greater safety when built up in the belief of the truth, so that they will not take first possession of a weak mind, nor, cheating it with dangerous falsehoods and delusions, fill it with preju- dices adverse to a sound understanding. Now, in regard to the canonical Scriptures, he must follow the judgment of the greater number of catholic churches ; and among these, of course, a high place must be given to such as have been thought worthy to be the seat of an apostle and to receive epistles. Accordingly, among the canonical Scriptures he will judge according to the following standard : to prefer those that are received by all the catholic churches to those which some do not receive. Among those, again, wdiich are not received by all, he will prefer such as have the sanction of the greater number and those of greater authority, to such as are held by the smaller number and those of less authority. If, however, he shall find that some books are held by the greater number of churches, and others by the churches of greater authority (though this is not a very likely thing to happen), I think that in such a case the authority on the two sides is to be looked upon as equal. 13. Now the whole canon of Scripture on which we say this judgment is to be exercised, is contained in the follow- ing books : — Five books of Moses, that is. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy ; one book of Joshua the son of Nun; one of Judges; one short book called Ptuth, which seems rather to beloncj to the be^innincf of Kinoes ; next, four books of Kings, and two of Chronicles, — these last not following 42 ON CITRISTIAX DOCTRINE. [bOOK II. one another, but running parallel, so to speak, and going over the same ground. The books now mentioned are history, which contains a connected narrative of the times, and follows the order of the events. There are other books which seem to follow no regular order, and are connected neither with the order of the preceding books nor with one another, such as Job, and Tobias, and Esther, and Judith, and the two books of Maccabees, and the two of Ezra,^ which last look more like a sequel to the continuous regular history which terminates with the books of Kings and Chronicles. Next are the Prophets, in which there is one book of the Psalms of David ; and three books of Solomon, viz. Proverbs, Song of Songs, and^cclesiastes. For two books, one called Wisdom and the other Ecclesiasticus, are ascribed to Solomon from a certain resemblance of style, but the most likely opinion is that they were written by Jesus the son of Sirach.' Still they are to be reckoned among the prophetical books, since they have attained recog- nition as being autlioritative. The remainder are the books which are strictly called the Prophets : twelve separate books of the prophets which are connected with one another, and liaving never been disjoined, are reckoned as one book ; the names of these prophets are as follows : — Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi ; then there are the four greater prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Ezekiel. The autliority of the Old Testament ^ is contained within the limits of these forty-four books. That of the New Testament, again, is contained within the following: — Four books of the Gospel, according to Matthew, according to Mark, according to Luke, according to John ; fourteen epistles of the Apostle Paul — one to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, one to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Pliilippians, two to the Thessalonians, one to the Colossians, two to Timothy, one to Titus, to Philemon, to the Hebrews ; two of Peter; three of John; one of Jude; and one of James; one book of the Acts of the Apostles ; and one of the Eevelation of John. ' Tliat is, Ezra and Nchcmiah. * Aii;;»istine in his Jiclradations witlulrew this opinion so far as regards tho hook of Wisdom. ^ This application of tlip i>hrase "Old Testament" is withdrawn and apolo- gized fur iji the Jidractadon^, CHAP. X.] THE METHOD OF STUDY. 43 Chap. ix. — How we should proceed in studying Scripture. 14. In . all these books those who fear God and are of a meek and pious disposition seek the will of God. And in pur- suing this search, the first rule to be observed is, as I said, to know these books, if not yet with the understanding, still to read them so as to commit them to memory, or at least so as not to remain wholly ignorant of them. Next, those matters that are plainly laid down in them, whether rules of life or rules of faith, are to be searched into more carefully and more dili- gently ; and the more of these a man discovers, the more capa- cious does his understanding become. For among the things that are plainly laid down in Scripture are to be found all matters that concern faith and the manner of life, — hope, to wit, and love, of which I have spoken in the previous book. After this, when we have made ourselves to a certain extent familiar with the language of Scripture, we may proceed to open up and investigate the obscure passages, and in doing so draw examples from the plainer expressions to throw light upon the more obscure, and use the evidence of passages about which there is no doubt to remove all hesitation in regard to the doubt- ful passages. And in this matter memory counts for a great deal ; bilt if the memory be defective, no rules can supply the want. Chap. x. — Unhnown or ambiguous signs p)revent Scripture from being tinderstood. 1 5. ]N'ow there are two causes which prevent what is written from being understood: its being veiled either under un- known, or under ambiguous signs. Signs are either proper or figurative. They are called proper when they are used to point out the objects they were designed to point out, as we say hos when we mean an ox, becaus e all men who with us use the Latin tongue call it by this name. Signs are figurative when the things themselves wliicli we indicate by the proper names are used to signify something else, as we say hos, and under- stand by that syllable the ox, which is ordinarily called by that name ; but then further by that ox understand a preacher of the gospel, as Scripture signifies, according to the apostle's explanation, when it says : " Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn."^ ^ Bovem tViturantem iion infienabis. — 1 Cor. ix. 9. 44 ox CIIRISTIAX DOCTRINf:. [BOOK II. Chap. xi. — Knov:h:dgc of languages, lApeclaUy of Greek and Hebrew, necessary to remove ignorance of signs. IG. The groat remedy for ignorance of proper signs is knowledge of languages. And men who speak the Latin tongue, of whom are those I have undertaken to instruct, need two other languages for the knowledge of Scripture, Hebrew and Greek, that they may have recourse to the original texts if the endless diversity of the Latin translators throw them into doubt. Although, indeed, we often find Hebrew words untranslated in the books, as for example, Amen, Halleluia, Ptaclia, llosanua, and others of the same kind. Some of these, although they could have been translated, have been preserved in their original form on account of the more sacred authority that attaches to it, as for example. Amen and Halleluia. Some of them, again, are said to be untranslatable into another tongue, of which the other two I have mentioned are examples. For in some languages there are words that cannot be trans- lated into the idiom of another language. And this happens chiefly in the case of interjections, which are words that ex- press rather an emotion of the mind than any part of a thought we have in our mind. And the two given above are said to be of this kind, Piacha expressing the cry of an angry man, Hosanna that of a joyful man. But the knowledge of these languages is necessary, not for the sake of a few words like these which it is very easy to mark and to ask about, but, as has been said, on account of the diversities among translators. For the translations of the Scriptures from Hebrew into Greek can be counted, but the Latin translators are out of all number. For in the early days of the faith every man who happened to get his hands upon a Greek manuscript, and who thought he had any knowledge, were it ever so little, of the two languages, ventured upon the work of translation. Chat. xii. — A diversity of interpretations is usifid. Errors arising fro77i ambiguous words. 17. And this circumstance would assist rather than hinder the understanding of Scripture, if only readers were not care- less. For the examination of a number of texts has often thrown light upon some of the more obscure passages ; for CHAP. XII.] COMPARISON OF Tr.xVNSLATIONS. 45' example, in that passage of the prophet Isaiah/ one translator reads : " And do not despise the domestics of thy seed ; " ^ another reads : "And do not despise thine own flesh." ^ Each of these in turn confirms the other. For the one is explained by the other ; because " flesh " may be taken in its literal sense, so that a man may understand that he is admonished not to despise his own body ; and " the domestics of thy seed" may be understood figuratively of Christians, because they are spiritually born of the same seed as ourselves, namely, the Word. When now the meaning of the two translators is com- pared, a more likely sense of the words suggests itself, viz. that the command is not to despise our kinsmen, because when one brings the expression " domestics of thy seed" into rela- tion with " flesh," kinsmen most naturally occur to one's mijQd. Whence, I think, that expression of the apostle, when he says, " If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them ;" * that is, that through emulation of those who had believed, some of them might believe too. And he calls the Jews liis "flesh," on account of the relationship of blood. Again, that passage from the same prophet Isaiah : ^ "If ye will not believe, ye shall not understand,"^ another has translated : " If ye will not believe, ye shall not abide." ^ Now which of these is the literal translation cannot be ascertained without reference to the text in the original tongue. And yet to those who read with knowledge, a great truth is to be found in each. For it is difiicult for interpreters to differ so widely as not to touch at some point. Accordingly here, as understanding consists in sight, and is abiding, but faith feeds us as babes, upon milk, in the cradles of temporal things (for now we walk by faith, not by sight) ;^ as, moreover, unless we walk by faith, we shall not attain to sight, which does not pass away, but abides, our understanding being purified by holding to the truth ; — for these 1 Isa. Iviii. 7, "And that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh" (A. V.). ^ Et domesticos seminis tui ne despexeris. ^ Et carnem tuam ne despexeris. * Rom. xi. 14. fi Isa. vii. 9, "If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established " (A. v.). ® Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis. ^ j^isi credideritis, non permanobitis. 8 2 Cor. V. 7. 40 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK II. reasons one says, " If ye will not Lelieve, ye shall not under- stand ;" but the other, "If ye will not believe, ye shall not abide." 18. And very often a translator, to whom the meaning is not well known, is deceived b}' an ambiguity in the original language, and puts upon the passage a construction that is wholly alien to the sense of the writer. As for example, some texts read : " Their feet are sharp to shed blood ;" ^ for the word of U9 among the Greeks means both sharp and si.uift. And so he saw the true meaning who translated : " Their feet are swift to shed blood." The other, taking the wrong sense of an ambii^uous word, fell into error. Is'ow translations such as this are not obscure, but false ; and there is a wide difference between the two things. For we must learn not to interpret, but to correct texts of this sort. For the same reason it is, that because the Greek word ijl6(T')(o^ means a calf, some have not understood that iioG'^evyiaTa? are shoots of trees, and have translated the word " calves ;" and this error has crept into so many texts, that you can hardly find it written in any other way. And yet the meaning is very clear ; for it is made evident by the words that follow. For " the plantings of an adulterer will not take deep root,"^ is a more suitable form of expression than the " calves ;" ^ because these walk upon the ground with their feet, and are not fixed in the earth by roots. In this i)assage, indeed, the rest of the context also justifies tliis translation. CiiAi'. XIII. — 11 ow faulty interpretations can be emended. 19. But since we do not clearly see what the actual thought is which the several translators endeavour to express, each according to liis own ability and judgment, unless we examine it in the language which they translate ; and since the trans- lator, if he be not a very learned man, often departs from the meaning of his author, we must cither endeavour to get a knowledge of those languages from which the Scriptures are translated into Latin, or we must get hold of the translations of those who keep rather close to the letter of the original, » Horn. iii. 15. » Wisd. iv. 3. * Adulteriua; plantationes non dabunt radices altas. * Vitulaniina. CHAP. XIII.] soLECis^rs and barbakisms. 47 not because these are sufficient, but because we may use tliem to correct the freedom or the error of others, who in their translations have chosen to follow the sense quite as much as the words. For not only single words, but often whole phrases are translated, which could not be translated at all into the Latin idiom by any one who wished to hold by the usage of the ancients who spoke Latin. And though these sometimes do not interfere with the understanding of the passage, yet they are offensive to those who feel greater delight in things when even the signs of those things are kept in their own purity. For what is called a solecism is nothing else than the putting of words together according to a different rule from that which those of our predecessors who spoke with any authority followed. For whether we say inter Jwmines (among men) or inter liominihus, is of no consequence to a man who only wishes to know the facts. And in the same way, what is a larharism but the pronouncing of a word in a different way from that in which those who spoke Latin before us pronounced it ? For whether the word ignoscere (to pardon) should be pronounced with the third syllable long or short, is not a matter of much concern to the man who is beseeching God, in any way at all that he can get the words out, to pardon his sins. What then is purity of speech, except the preserving of the custom of language established by the autho- rity of former speakers ? 20. And men are easily offended in a matter of this kind, just in proportion as they are weak ; and they are weak just in proportion as they wish to seem learned, not in the know- ledge of things which tend to edification, but in that of signs, by which it is hard not to be puffed up,^ seeing that the know- ledge of things even would often set up our neck, if it were not held down by the yoke of our Master. For how does it prevent our understanding it to have the following passage thus expressed : " Quce est terra in qua isti insidunt supper earn, si hona est an nequam ; et quce sunt civitates, in quihus ipsi inhabitant in ijms?"^ And I am more disposed to think that * Comp. 1 Cor. viii. 1. 2 '* And what the land is that they dwell in, whether it be good or bad ; and what cities they be that they dwell in."— Num. xiii. 19 (A. V.). 48 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTPJNE. [BOOK II. this is simply the idiom of another language than that any deeper meaning is intended. Again, that phrase, which we cannot now take away from the lips of the people who sing it : "Super ipsuin autcm Jlorid sandificatio onca,"^ surely takes away nothing fiom the meaning. Yet a more learned man would prefer that tliis should be corrected, and that we should say, not Jlorid, but JlorcliL Nor does anything stand in the way of the correction being made, except the usage of the singers. Mistakes of this kind, then, if a man do not choose to avoid them altogether, it is easy to treat with indifference, as not interfering with a right understanding. But take, on the other hand, the saying of the apostle : " Quod stultum est Dei, sapicntius est liominihus, et quocl infirmum est Dei, fortius est liomimhus!'^ If any one should retain in this passage the Greek idiom, and say, " Quocl stultum est Dei, sapientius est lioniiiiuiii et quod infirmum est Dei fortius est homimun," ^ a quick and careful reader would indeed by an effort attain to the true meanincr, but still a man of slower intelligence either would not understand it at all, or would put an utterly false construction upon it. For not only is such a form of speech faulty in the Latin tongue, but it is ambiguous too, as if the meaning might be, that the folly of men or the weakness of men is wiser or stronger than that of God. But indeed even the expression sapicntius est liominibus (stronger than men) is not free from ambiguity, even though it be free from solecism. For whether Iwminihus is put as the plural of the dative or as the plural of the ablative, does not appear, unless by reference to tlie meaning. It would be better then to say, sapicntius est qucun homines, and fortius est qiiam homines. Chap. xiv. — JTow the meaning of iinhiown xcords and idioms w to he dlscovo'ed. 21. Al)nut ambiguous signs, however, I shall speak after- wards. I am treating at joresent of uulcnown signs, of which, as far as the words are concerned, there are two kinds. For ^ " But upon himself shall my holiness flourish." — Ps. cxxxii. IS (see LXX.). " But iipon himself shall his crown flourish" (A. V.). * " Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronf^er than men" (1 Cor. i. 25). 3 " What is foolish of God is wiser of men, and what is weak of God is stronger of men. " CHAP. XV.] IGNORANCE OF -WORDS AND THRASES. 49 either a word or an idiom, of which the reader is ignorant, brings him to a stop. Xow if these belong to foreign tongues, we must either make inquiry about them from men who speak those tongues, or if we have leisure wx must learn the tongues ourselves, or we must consult and compare several translators. If, however, there are words or idioms in our own tongue that we are unacquainted wdth, we gradually come to know them through being accustomed to read or to hear them. There is nothing that it is better to commit to memory than those kinds of words and phrases whose meaning we do not know, so that where we happen to meet either with a more learned man of whom we can inquire, or with a passage that shows, either by the preceding or succeeding context, or by both, the force and significance of the phrase we are ignorant of, we can easily by the help of our memory turn our attention to the matter and learn all about it. So great, however, is the force of custom, even in regard to learning, that those who have been in a sort of way nurtured and brought up on the study of Holy Scripture, are surprised at other forms of speech, and think them less pure Latin than those which they have learnt from Scripture, but which are not to be found in Latin authors. In this matter, too, the great number of the translators proves a very great assistance, if they are examined and discussed with a careful comparison of their texts. Only all positive error must be removed. For those who are anxious to know the Scriptures ought in the first place to use their skill in the correction of the texts, so that the uncorrected ones should give way to the corrected, at least w^hen they are copies of the same translation. Chap. xv. — Among versions a preference is given to the Septuaghit and the Itala. 22. Xow among translations themselves the Italian {Itala)^ is to be preferred to the others, for it keeps closer to the words without prejudice to clearness of expression. And to correct the Latin we must use the Greek versions, among which the authority of the Septuagint is pre-eminent as far as the Old' ^ The translation here referred to is the Vetus Latlna, as revised by the Church of Northern Italy in the fourth century, prior to the final recension of Jerome, commonly called the Vulgate. CHE. DOCT. D 50 ox CIinT=^TTAN DOCTRIXE. [f-OOK II. Testament is concerned ; for it is reported through all the more learned churches tliat the seventy translators enjoyed so much of tlie presence and power of the Holy Spirit in tlieir work of translation, that among that numher of men there was but one voice. And if, as is reported, and as many not un- worthy of confidence assert,^ they were separated during the work of translation, each man being in a cell by himself, and yet nothing was found in the manuscript of any one of them that was not found in the same words and in the same order of words in all the rest, who dares put anything in comparison with an authority like this, not to speak of pre- ferring anything to it ? And even if they conferred together with the result that a unanimous agreement sprang out of the common labour and judgment of them all ; even so, it would not be right or becoming for any one man, whatever his experience, to aspire to coiTCct the unanimous opinion of many venerable and learned men. Wherefore, even if any- thincr is found in the oriojinal Hebrew in a different form from that in which these men have expressed it, I think we must give way to the dispensation of Providence which used these men to bring it about, that books which the Jewish race were unwilling, either from religious scruple or from jealousy, to make known to other nations, were, with the assistance of the power of King Ptolemy, made known so long beforehand to the nations which in the future were to believe in the Lord. And thus it is possible that they translated in such a way as the Holy Spirit, who worked in them and had given them all one voice, thought most suitable for the Gentiles. But never- theless, as I said above, a comparison of those translators also who have kept most closely to the words, is often not witliout value as a help to the clearing up of the meaning. Tlie Latin texts, therefore, of the Old Testament are, as I was about to say, to be corrected if necessary by the authority of the Greeks, and especially by that of those who, though they were seventy in number, are said to have translated as with one voice. As to the books of the Now Testament, again, if any perplexity arises from the diversities of the Latin texts, wo ' Among these nre Justin Martyr, Irenanis, ami Clomons Aloxandrinus. Comp. Augustine, Dc Civ. Dii, win. 43, anp. 71 ami 75. CHAP. XVI.] IXTEEPKETATION OF METAPIIOES. must of course yield to tlie Greek, especially those that are found in the churches of greater learning and research. CuAP. XVI.— The hioioledge both of language and tilings is helpful for the understanding of figurative expressions, 23. In the case of figurative signs, again, if ignorance of any of them should chance to bring the reader to a stand-still, their meaning is to be traced partly by the knowledge of languages, partly by the knowledge of things. The pool of Siloam, for example, where the man whose eyes our Lord had anointed with clay made out of spittle was commanded to wash, has a figurative significance, and undoubtedly conveys a secret sense ; but yet if the evangelist had not interpreted that name,^ a meaning so important would lie unnoticed. And we cannot doubt that, in the same way, many Hebrew names which have not been interpreted by the writers of those books, would, if any one could interpret them, be of great value and service in solving the enigmas of Scripture. And a number of men skilled in that language have conferred no small benefit on posterity by explaining all these words without reference to their place in Scripture, and telling us what Adam means, what Eve, what Abraham, what Moses^and also the names of places, what Jerusalem signifies, or Sion, or Sinai, or Lebanon, or Jordan, and whatever other names in that language we are not acquainted with. And when these names have been investigated and explained, many figurative expressions in Scripture become clear. 24. Ignorance of things, too, renders figurative expressions obscure, as when we do not know the nature of the animals, or minerals, or plants, which are frequently referred to in Scripture by way of comparison. The fact so well known about the serpent, for example, that to protect its head it will present its whole body to its assailants — how much light it throws upon the meaning of our Lord's command, that we should be wise as serpents ; ^ that is to say, that for the sake of our head, which is Christ, w^e should willingly ofier our body to the persecutors, lest the Christian faith should, as it were, be destroyed in us, if to save the body we deny our God ! Or again, the statement that the serpent gets rid of 1 John ix. 7. 2 jy^^tt. x. 16. 52 ON CIiniSTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK H. its old skin by s(|ueeziii^ jtself throu^^h a narrow hole, and thus acquires new strength^how appropriately it fits in wiili tlie direction to imitate the wisdom of the serpent, and to put oir the old man_, as the apostle says^ that we may put on the new;^ and to i)ut it off, too, by coming through a narrow place, according to the saying of our Lord, " Enter ye in at the strait gate !" ^ As, tlicn, knowledge of the nature of the serpent throws light upon many metaphors which Scripture is accustomed to draw from that animal, so ignorance of other animals, which are no less frequently mentioned by way of comparison, is a very great drawback to the reader. And so in regard to minerals and plants : knowledge of the carbuncle, for instance, which shines_ in the dark, throws light upon many of the dark places in books too, where it is used metaphorically; and ignorance of the beryl or the adamant often shuts the doors of knowledge. And the only reason why we find it easy to understand that perpetual peace is indicated by the olive branch which the dove brought Avith it when it returned to the ark,^ is that we know both that the smooth touch of olive oil is not easily spoiled by a fluid of another kind, and that the tree itself is an evergreen. !Many, again, by reason of their ignorance of hyssop, not knowing the virtue it has in cleansing the lungs, nor tlie power it is said to have of piercing rocks with its roots, although it is a small and insignificant plant, cannot make out why it is said, " Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean." * \ 25. Ignorance of numbers, too, prevents us from understand- ing things tliat are set down in Scripture in a figurative and mystical way. A candid mind, if I may so speak, cannot but be anxious* for example, to ascertain what is meant by the fact that Moses and Elijah, and our Lord Himself, all fasted for forty days.*^ And except by knowledge of and reflection upon the number, the dilficulty of explaining the figure involved in til is action cannot be got over. Yov the number contains ten four times, indicating tlie knowledge of all things, and that knowledge interwoven with time. For both the diurnal and the annual revolutions are accomplished in periods numbering ' Eph. iv. 22. » Matt. vii. 13. ^ Goii. viii. 11. ♦ Ps. li. 7. ^ E.\. x.xiv. IS ; 1 Kings xix. S ; Matt. iv. 2. CHAP. XVI.] THE USE OF ArJTHMETICAL KNOWLEDGE. 53 four eacli ; the diurnal in the hours of the morning, the noon- tide, the evening, and the night ; the annual in tlie spring, summer, autumn, and winter months. Now while we live in time, we must abstain and fast from all joy in time, for the sake of that eternity in which we wish to live ; although by the passage of time we are taught this very lesson of despis- ing time and seeking eternity. Further, the number ten signi- fies the knowledge of the Creator and the creature, for there is a trinity in the Creator ; and the number seven indicates the creature, because of the life and the body. For the life con- sists of three parts, whence also God is to be loved with the whole heart, the whole soul, and the whole mind ; and it is very clear that in the body there are four elements of which it is made up. In this number ten, therefore, when it is placed before us in connection with time, that is, when it is taken four times, we are admonished to live unstained by, and not partaking of, any delight in time, that is, to fast for forty days. Of this we are admonished by the law personified in Moses, by prophecy personified in Elijah, and by our Lord Himself, who, as if receiving the witness both of the law and the prophets, appeared on the mount between the other two, while His three disciples looked on in amazement. Xext, we have to inquire in the same way, how out of the number forty springs the number fifty, which in our religion has no ordinary sacredness attached to it on account of the Pentecost, and how this number taken thrice on account of the three divisions of time, before the law, under the law, and under grace, or perhaps on account of the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and the Trinity itself being added over and above, has reference to the mystery of the most Holy Church, and reaches to the number of the one hundred and fifty-three fishes which were taken after the resurrection of our Lord, when the nets were cast out on the right-hand side of the boat.^ And in the same way, many other numbers and combinations of numbers are used in the sacred writings, to convey instruc- tion under a figurative guise, and ignorance of numbers often shuts out the reader from this instruction. 26. Not a few things, too, are closed against us and obscured * John xxi. 11. 54 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. by ignorance of music. One man, for example, has not un- skilfully explained some metaphors from the difference between the psaltery and the harp.^ And it is a question which it is not out of place for learned men to discuss, whether there is any musical law that compels the psaltery of ten chords to have just so many strings ; or whether, if there be no such law, the number itself is not on that very account the more to be considered as of sacred significance, either with reference to the ten commandments of the law (and if again any question is raised about that number, we can only refer it to the Creator and the creature), or with reference to the number ten itself as interpreted above. And the number of years the temple was in building, which is mentioned in the gospel" — viz. forty- six — has a certain undefinable musical sound, and when re- ferred to the structure of our Lord's body, in relation to which the temple was mentioned, compels many heretics to confess that our Lord put on, not a false, but a true and human body. And in several places in the Holy Scriptures we lind both numbers and music mentioned with honour. CiiAr. XVII. — Orirjin of the legend oftlie nine ITiises. 27. For we must not listen to the falsities of heathen super- stition, which represent the nine Muses as daughters of Jupiter and Mercury. Varro refutes these, and I doubt whether any one can be found among them more curious or more learned in such matters. He says that a certain state (I don't recollect the name) ordered from each of tliree artists a set of statues of the !Muses, to be placed as an offering in the temple of Apollo, intending that whichever of the artists produced the most beautiful statues, they should select and purchase from him. It so happened that these artists executed their works with equal beauty, that all nine pleased the state, and that all were bought to be dedicated in the temple of Apollo ; and he says that afterwards Hesiod the poet gave names to them all. It was not Jui)iter, therefore, that begat the nine Pluses, but three artists created tln-ee each. And the state had originally given the order for tliree, not because it had seen them in visions, nor because they had presented themselves in that number to 1 Ps. xxxiii. 2. •John il 20. CHAP. XIX.] THE USE OF HEATHEN LEAHNING. 55 the eyes of any of the citizens, but because it was obvious to remark that all sound, which is the material of song, is by nature of three kinds. For it is either produced by the voice, as in the case of those who sing with the mouth without an instrument ; or by blowing, as in the case of trumpets and flutes ; or by striking, as in the case of harps and drums, and all other instruments that give their sound when struck. CiiAP. XVIII. — No help is to be despised, even tJioi([/h it come from a profane •source. 28. But whether the fact is as Varro has related, or is not so, still we ought not to give up music because of the super- stition of the heathen, if we can derive anything from it that is of use for the understanding of Holy Scripture ; nor does it follow that we must busy ourselves with their theatrical trumpery because we enter upon an investigation about harps and other instruments, that may help us to lay hold upon spiritual things. For we ought not to refuse to learn letters because they say that Mercury discovered them ; nor because they have dedicated temples to Justice and Virtue, and prefer to worship in the form of stones things that ought to have their place in the heart, ought w^e on that account to forsal^e justice and virtue. N'ay, but let every good and true Chris- tian understand that wherever truth may be found, it belongs to his Master ; and while he recognises and acknowledges the truth, even in their religious literature, let him reject the figments of superstition, and let him grieve over and avoid men who, " when they knew God, glorified him not as God, neither were thankful ; but became vain in their imagjinations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things."-^ CnAr. XIX. — Two kinds of heathen Jcnoidedge. 2 9. But to explain more fully this whole topic (for it is one that cannot be omitted), there are two kinds of knowledge which are in vogue among the heathen. One is the knowledge of things instituted by men, the other of things which they » Rom. i. 21-23. 56 ox CIiniSTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IT. have notedj either as transacte d in the past or as instituted by God, The former kind, that ^vhich deals ^vith huiuan institu- tions, is partly superstitious, partly not. Chap. xx. — The svpei'st'Uious nature of human institutions. 30. All the arrangements made by men for the making and worshipping of idols are superstitious, pertaining as they do either to the worship of what is created or of some part of it as God, or to consultations and arrangements about signs and leagues with devils, such, for example, as are employed in the magical arts, and which the poets are accustomed not so much to teach as to celebrate. And to this class belong, but with a bolder reach of deception, the books of the haruspices and augurs. In this class we must place also all amulets and cures which the medical art condemns, whether these consist in incantations, or in marks which they call characters, or in hanging or tying on or even dancing in a fashion certain articles, not with reference to the condition of the body, but to certain signs hidden or manifest ; and these remedies they call by the less offensive name of pJujsica, so as to appear not to be engaged in superstitious observances, but to be taking advantage of the forces of nature. Examples of these are the ear-rings on the top of each ear, or the rings of ostrich bone on the fingers, or telling you when you hiccup to hold your left thumb in your right hand. 31. To these we may add thousands of the most frivolous practices, that are to be observed if any part of the body should jump, or if, when friends are walking arm-in-arm, a stone, or a dog, or a boy, should come between them. And the kicking of a stone, as if it were a divider of friends, does less harm than to cuft' an innocent boy if he happens to run between men Avho are walking side by side. But it is delightful that the boys are sometimes avenged by the dogs ; for frequently men are so superstitious as to venture upon striking a dog who has run between them, — not with impunity however, for instead of a superstitious remedy, the dog sometimes makes his assailant run in hot haste for a real surgeon. To this class, too, belong the following rules : To tread upon the threshold when you go out in front of the house ; to go back to bed if any one should CHAP. XXI.] SLTEESTITIOX OF ASTEOLOGEPvS. 57 sneeze when you are putting on your slippers ; to return home if you stumble when going to a place ; when your clothes are eaten by mice, to be more frightened at the prospect of coming misfortune than grieved by your present loss. Whence that witty saying of Cato, who, when consulted by a man who told him that the mice had eaten his boots, replied, " That is not strange, but it would have been very strange indeed if the boots had eaten the mice." Chap. xxi. — Superstition of astrologers. 32. I^or can we exclude from this kind of superstition those who were called genethliaci, on account of their attention to birthdays, but are now commonly called matlicmatici. For these, too, although they may seek with pains for the true posi- tion of the stars at the time of our birth, and may sometimes even find it out, yet in so far as they attempt thence to pre- dict our actions, or the consequences of our actions, grievously err, and sell inexperienced men into a miserable bondage. For when any freeman goes to an astrologer of this kind, he gives money that he may come away the slave either of Mars or of Venus, or rather, perhaps, of all the stars to which those who first fell into this error, and handed it on to posterity, have given the names either of beasts on account of their likeness to beasts, or of men with a view to confer honour on those men. And this is not to be wondered at, when we consider that even in times more recent and nearer our own, the Eomans made an attempt to dedicate the star which we call Lucifer to the name and honour of Ctesar. And this would, perhaps, have been- done, and the name handed down to distant ages, only that his ancestress Venus had given her name to this star before him, and could not by any law trans- fer to her heirs what she had never possessed, nor sought to possess, in life. For where a place was vacant, or not held in honour of any of the dead of former times, the usual proceeding in such cases was carried out. For example, we have changed the names of the months Quintilis and Sextilis to July and August, naming them in honour of the men Julius Cix?sar and Augustus Caesar ; and from this instance any one who cares can easily see that the stars spoken of above formerly 58 ON CIIPJSTIAX DOCTRINE. [COOK II. wandered in the heavens without the names they now bear. But as the men were dead whose memory people were either compelled by royal power or impelled by human folly to honour, they seemed to think that in putting tlieir names upon the stars tliey were raising the dead men themselves to heaven. But whatever they may be called by men, still there are stars which God has made and set in order after His own pleasure, and they have a fixed movement, by which the seasons are distinguished and varied. And when any one is born, it is easy to observe the point at which tliis movement has an-ived, by use of the rules discovered and laid down by those who are rebuked by Holy Writ in these terms : " For if they were able to know so much that they could weigh the world, how did they not more easily liud out the Lord thereof ? " ' Chap. xxii. — Thefolhj of observing the stars in order to predict the events of a Ife. 33. But to desire to predict tlie characters, the acts, and the fate of those who are born from such an observation, is a great delusion and great madness. And among those at least who have any sort of acquaintance with matters of this kind (which, indeed, are only fit to be unlearnt again), tliis superstition is refuted beyond the reach of doubt. For the observation js of the position of the stars, which they call constellations, at the time when the person was born about whom these wretched men are consulted by their still more wretched dupes. Now it may happen that, in the case of twins, one follows the other out of the womb so closely that tliere is no interval of time between them that can be apprehended and marked in tlie position of the constellations. Whence it necessarily follows tliat twins are in many cases born under the same stars, while they do not meet with equal fortune either in what they do or what they suffer, but often meet with fates so different that one of them has a most fortunate life, the other a most unfortunate. As, for example, we are told that Esau and Jacob were born twins, and in such close suc- cession, that Jacob, who was born last, was found to liave laid liold with his hand upon tlie lieel of his brother, who preceded 1 Wisil xiii. 9. CHAP. XXIII.] THE FOLLY OF DIVINATION EXPOSED, 59 hini.-^ Now, assuredly, the day and hour of the birth of these two could not be marked in any way that would not give both the same constellation. But what a difi'erence there was between the characters, the actions, the labours, and the for- tunes of these two, the Scriptures bear witness, which are now so widely spread as to be in the mouth of all nations. 34. Nor is it to the point to say that the very smallest and briefest moment of time that separates the birth of twins, produces great effects in nature, and in the extremely rapid motion of the heavenly bodies. For, although I may grant that it does produce the greatest effects, yet the astrologer cannot discover this in the constellations, and it is by looking into these that he professes to read the fates. If, then, he does not discover the difference when he examines the constel- lations, which must, of course, be the same whether he is consulted about Jacob or his brother, what does it profit him that there is a difference in the heavens, which he rashly and carelessly brings into disrepute, when there is no difference in his chart, which he looks into anxiously but in vain ? And so these notions also, which have their origin in certain signs of things being arbitrarily fixed upon by the presumption of men, are to be referred to the same class as if they were leagues and covenants with devils. Chap, xxiii. — Why ice repudiate arts of divination. 35. Tor in this way it comes to pass that men who lust after evil things are, by a secret judgment of God, delivered over to be mocked and deceived, as the just reward of their evil desires. For they are deluded and imposed on by the false angels, to whom the lowest part of the world has been put in subjection by the law of God's providence, and in accordance with His most admirable arrangement of things. And the result of these delusions and deceptions is, that through these superstitious and baneful modes of divination, many tilings in the past and future are made known, and turn out just as they are foretold ; and in the case of those who practise super- stitious observances, many things turn out agreeably to their observances, and ensnared by these successes, they become ' Gen. XXV. 24. CO ON CIirvTSTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. more eagerly inquisitive, and involve themselves further and further in a labyrinth of most pernicious error. And to our advantage, the AVord of God is not silent about this species of fornication of the soul; and it does not warn the soul against following such practices on the ground that those who profess them speak lies, but it says, " Even if what they tell you should come to pass, hearken not unto them." ^ For though the ghost of the dead Samuel foretold the truth to King Saul,' that does not make such sacrilegious observances as those by wliich his ghost was brought up the less detestable ; and though the ventriloquist woman ^ in the Acts of the Apostles bore true testimony to the apostles of the Lord, the Apostle Paul did not spare the evil spirit on that account, but rebuked and cast it out, and so made the woman clean.* 36. All arts of this sort, therefore, are either nullities, or are part of a guilty superstition, springing out of a baleful fellowship between men and devils, and are to be utterly repudiated and avoided by the Christian as the covenants of a false and treacherous friendship. " Not as if the idol were anything," says the apostle ; " but because the things which they sacrifice they sacrifice to devils and not to God ; and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils." ^ Now, what the apostle has said about idols and the sacrifices offered in their honour, that we ought to feel in regard to all fancied signs which lead either to the worship of idols, or to worshipping creation or its parts instead of God, or which are connected with attention to medicinal charms and other observances; for these are not appointed by God as the public means of promoting love towards God and our neighbour, but they waste the hearts of wretched men in private and selfisli strivings after temporal things. Accordingly, in regard to all these branches of knowledge, we must fear and shun the fellowship of demons, wlio, with the Devil their prince, strive only to shut and bur the door against our return. As, then, * Comp. Dout. xiii. 1-3. '1 Sam. xxviii,, romp. Eoclus. xlvi. 20. 5 Ventrilofjua femina. The woman witli a familiar spirit to whom Saul re- sorted in his pxtremity is called iu the Soptuagint translation iyyavrfiuvPot. See 1 Sam. xxviii. 7. * Acts xvi. 16-18. » 1 Cor. x. 19, 20. CHAP. XXIY.] DEMONIACAL OrJGIN OF SOr.CEr.Y. 61 from the stars wliicli God created and ordained, men liave drawn lying omens of their own fancy, so also from things that are born, or in any other way come into existence under the government of God's providence, if there chance only to be something unusual in the occurrence, — as when a mule brings forth young, or an object is struck by lightning, — men have frequently drawn omens by conjectures of their own, and have committed them to writing, as if they had drawn them by rule. Chap. xxiv. — The intercourse and agreement with demons wlilch superstitious observances maintain. 37. And all these omens are of force just so far as has been arranged with the devils by that previous understanding in the mind which is, as it were, the common language, but they are all full of hurtful curiosity, torturing anxiety, and deadly slavery. For it was not because they had meaning that they were attended to, but it was by attending to and marking them that they came to have meaning. And so they are made different for different people, according to their several notions and prejudices. For those spirits which are bent upon deceiving, take care to provide for each person the same sort of omens as they see his own conjectures and preconceptions have already entangled him in. For, to take an illustration, the same figure of the letter X, which is made in the shape of a cross, means one thinfjj amono- the Greeks and another amoncj the Latins, not by nature, but by agreement and pre- arrange- ment as to its signification ; and so, any one who knows both lanf]jua£jes uses this letter in a different sense when writincj to a Greek from that in which he uses it when writing to a Latin. And the same sound, heta, which is the name of a letter among the Greeks, is the name of a vegetable among the Latins ; and when I say, lege, these two syllables mean one thing to a Greekand^another to a Latin. Now, just as all these signs affect the mind according to the arrangements of the community in which each man lives, and affect different men's minds differently, because these arrangements are different ; and as, further, men did not agree upon them as signs because they were already significant, but on the con- trary they are now significant because men have agreed upon C2 ON CIiniSTIAN DOCTPJXE. [BOOK II. them ; in the same way also, those signs by which the ruinous intercourse with devils is maintained have meaning just in proportion to each man's observations. And this appears quite plainly in the rites of the augurs ; for they, both before they observe the omens and after they have completed their observations, take pains not to see the flight or hear the cries of birds, because these omens are of no significance apart from tlie previous arrangement in the mind of the observer. CiiAP. XXV. — Tn human institutions which are not superstitious, there are some things superfluous and some convenient and necessamj. 38. But when all these ha ve been cut aw ay and rooted out of the mind of the Christian, we must then look at human institutions which are no t su])erstitious, that is, such as are not set up in association with devils, but by men in association with one another. For all arrangements that are in force among men, because they have agreed among themselves that they should be in force,, are human institutions j and of these, some are matters of superfluity and luxury, some of convenience and necessity. For if those signs which the actors make in dancing were of force by nature, and not by the arrangement and agreement of men, the public crier would not in former times have announced to the people of Carthage, while the pantomime was dancing, what it was he meant to express, — a thing still remembered by many old men from whom we have frequently heard it.^ And we may well believe this, because even now, if any one who is unaccustomed to such follies goes into the theatre, unless some one tells liim what these move- ments mean, lie will give liis whole attention to them in vain. Yet all men aim at a certain degree of likeness in their choice of signs, that the signs may as far as possible be like the things tliey signify. But because one thing may resemble another in many ways, such signs are not always of the same significance among men, except wlieii tliey have mutually agreed upon them. 39. But in regard to pictures and statues, and other works of this kind, wliich are intended as representations of things, nobody makes a mistake, especially if they are executed by skilled artists, but every one, as soon as he sees the likenesses, > See Tylor's Earhj History of Maulind, pp. 42, 4?. CHAP. XXVI.] HOW TO DEAL WITH HUMAN INSTITUTIONS. 63 recognises the things they are likenesses of. And this whole class are to be reckoned among the superfluous devices of men, unless when it is a matter of importance to inquire in regard to any of them, for what reason, where, when, and by whose authority it was made. Finally, the thousands of fables and fictions, in whose lies men take delight, are human devices, and nothing is to be considered more peculiarly man's own and derived from himself than anything that is false and lying. Among the convenient and necessary arrangements of men mth men are to be reckoned whatever differences they choose to make in bodily dress and ornament for the purpose of dis- tinguishing sex or rank ; and the countless varieties of signs without which human intercourse either could not be carried on at all, or would be carried on at great inconvenience ; and the arrangements as to weights and measures, and the stamp- ing and weighing of coins, which are peculiar to each state and people, and other things of the same kind. ISTow these, if they were not devices of men, would not be different in different nations, and could not be changed among particular nations at the discretion of their respective sovereigns. 40. This whole class of human arrangements, which are of convenience for the necessary intercourse of life, the Christian is not by any means to neglect, but on the contrary should pay a sufficient degree of attention to them, and keep them in memory. Chap. xxvi. — What Jmman contrivances tve are to adopt, and ivhat ive are to avoid. For certain institutions of men are in a sort of way re- presentations and likenesses of natural objects. And of these, such as have relation to fellowship with devils must, as has been said, be utterly rejected and held in detestation ; those, on the other hand, which relate to the mutual intercourse of men, are, so far as they are not matters of luxury and super- fluity, to be adopted, especially the forms of the letters which are necessary for reading, and the various languages as far as is required — a matter I have spoken of above.^ To this class also belong shorthand characters,^ those who are acquainted with which are called shorthand writers.^ All these are useful, * See above, chap. xi. 2 Xqi^q, 3 Js^otar'd. C4 ON CIirvISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. and there is nothing unlawful in learning them, nor do they inyolve us in superstition, or enervate us hy luxury, if they only occupy our minds so far as not to stand in tlie way of more important objects to which they ought to be subservient. Chap, xxvii. — Some departments of knoioledge, not of mere human invention, aid tis in interpreting Scripture. 41. But, comin g to the next point, we are not to reckon among human instit utions those things which men have handed down to us, not a s arrangements of their own , but as the result of Investigati on into the occurrences of the past, and into the arran.gemen ts of God's providen ce. And of these, some pertain to the bodily senses, some to the intellect. Those which are reached by the bodily senses we either believe on testimony, or perceive wdien they are pointed out to us, or infer from experience. Chap, xxviii. — To what extent histomj is an aid. 42. Anything, theUj tliat we learn fi-om history about the chronology of past tim es assists us very much in understanding the Sc riptures, even if it be learnt without the pale of the Church as a matter of childish instruction. For we frequently seek information about a variety of matters by use of the Olympiads, and the names of the consuls ; and ignorance of the consulship in which our Lord was born, and that in which He suffered, has led some into the error of supposing that He was forty-six years of age when He suffered, that being the number of years He was told by the Jews the temple (which He took as a symbol of His body) was in building.^ Now we know on the authority of the evangelist that He was about thirty years of age when He was baptized ;* but the number of years He lived afterwards, although by putting His actions together we can make it out, yet that no shadow of doubt might arise from anotlier source, can be ascertained more clearly and more certainly from a comparison of profane history with the gospel. It will still be evident, however, that it was not without a purpose it was said that the temple was forty and six years in building; so that, as this cannot be referred to our Lord's age, it may be referred to the more i Joliu ii. 19. ' Luke iii. 23. CHAP. XXVIII.] THE UTILITY OF HISTORY. 65 secret formation of the body which, for our sakes, the only-be- gotten Son of God, by whom all things were made, condescended to put on/ 43. As to the utility of history, moreover, passing over the Greeks, wha^a great question our own Ambrose has set at rest ! For, when the readers and admirers of Plato dared calumniously to assert that our Lord Jesus Christ learnt all those sayings of His, which they are compelled to admire and praise, from the books of Plato — because (they urged) it cannot be denied that Plato lived long before the coming of our Lord ! — did not the illustrious bishop, when by his investiga- tions into profane history he had discovered that Plato made a journey into Eg}^t at the time when Jeremiah the prophet was there," show that it is much more likely that Plato was through Jeremiah's means initiated into our literature, so as to be able to teach and write those views of his which are so justly praised ? Por not even Pythagoras himself, from whose successors these men assert Plato learnt theology, lived at a date prior to the books of that Hebrew race, among whom the worship of one God sprang up, and of whom as concerning the flesh our Lord came. And thus, when we reflect upon the dates, it becomes much more probable that those philosophers learnt whatever they said that was good and true from our literature, than that the Lord Jesus Christ learnt from the writings of Plato, — a thing which it is the height of folly to believe. 44. And even when in the course of an historical narrative former institutions of men are described, the history itself is not to be reckoned among human institutions ; because things that are past and gone and cannot be undone are to be reckoned as belonging to the course of time, of wliich God is the author and governor. For it is one thing to tell what has been done, another to show what ought to be done. History narrates what has been don e, faithfully and w ith advantage ; but the books of the haruspices, and all writings of the same kind, aim at teaching what ought to be done or observed, using the boldness of an adviser, not the fidelity of a narrator. * See above, chap. xvi. 2 Augustine himself corrected this mistake. Retractations, ii. 4. CHR. DOCT. il GQ ON CHRISTIAN DOCTTJNE. [dOOK U. Chap. xxix. — To what extent natural science is an ezegetical aid. 45. There is also a species of narrative res embling descrip- tion, in ^vllich not a past but an existing state of things is made known to those who are ignorant of it. To this species belongs all that has been written about the situation of places, and the nature of animals, trees, herbs, stones, and other bodies. And of this species I have treated above, and have sho^vn that this kind of knowledge is serviceable in solving the difficulties of Scripture, not that these objects are to be used conformably to certain signs as nostrums or the instruments of superstition ; for that kind of knowledge I have already set aside as distinct from the lawful and free kind now spoken of. For it is one thing to say : If you bruise down this herb and drink it, it will remove the pain from your stomach ; and another to say : If you hang this herb round your neck, it will remove the pain from your stomach. In the former case the wholesome mix- ture is approved of, in the latter the superstitious charm is condemned ; although indeed, where incantations and invoca- tions and marks are not used, it is frequently doubtful whether the thing that is tied or fixed in any way to the body to cure it, acts by a natural virtue, in which case it may be freely used ; or acts by a sort of charm, in which case it becomes the Christian to avoid it the more carefully, the more efficacious it may seem to be. But when the reason why a thing is of virtue does not appear, the intention with which it is used is of great importance, at least in healing or in tempering bodies, whether in medicine or in agriculture. 4G. The knowledge of the stars, again, is not a matter of narration, but of description. Very few of these, however, are mentioned in Scripture. And as the course of the moon, which is regularly employed in reference to celebrating the anniversary of our Lord's passion, is known to most people ; so the rising and setting and other movoincuts of the rest of the heavenly bodies are thoroughly known to very few. And this knowledge, although in itself it involves no superstition, renders very little, indeed almost no assistance, in the interpre- tation of Holy Scripture, and by engaging the attention un- profitably is a hindrance ratlicr ; and as it is closely related to the very pernicious error uf the diviners of the fiites, it is more CHAP. XXXI.] OF THE MECHANICAL ARTS. 67 convenient and becoming to neglect it. It involves, moreover, in addition to a description of the present state of things, something like a narrative of the past also ; because one may- go back from the present position and motion of the stars, and trace by rule their past movements. It involves also regular anticipations of the future, not in the way of forebodings and omens, but by way of sure calculation ; not with the design of drawing any information from them as to our own acts and fates, in the absurd fashion of the gmctliliaci, but only as to the motions of the heavenly bodies themselves. For, as the man who computes the moon's age can tell, when he has found out her age to-day, what her age was any number of years ago, or what wiU be her age any number of years hence, in just the same way men who are skilled in such computations are ac- customed to answer like questions about every one of the heavenly bodies. And I have stated what my views are about aU this knowledge, so far as regards its utility. Chap. xxx. — What the mechanical arts contribute to exerjetlcs. 47. Further, as to the remaining arts, whether those by which something is made which, when the effort of the work- man is over, remains as a result of his work, as, for example, a house, a bench, a disli, and other things of that kind ; or those which, so to speak, assist God in His operations, as medicine, and agriculture, and navigation ; or those whose sole result is an action, as dancing, and racing, and wrestling ; — in all these arts experience teaches us to infer the future from the past. For no man who is skilled in any of these arts moves y his limbs in any operation without connecting the memory of the past with the expectation of the future. Now of these arts a very superficial and cursory knowledge is to be acquired, not with a view to practising them (unless some duty com- pel us, a matter on which I do not touch at present), but with a view to forming a judgment about them, that we may not be wholly ignorant of what Scripture means to convey when it employs figures of speech derived from these arts. Chap. xxxt. — Use of dialectics. Of fallacies. 48. There remain those branches of knowledge which per- G8 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [dOOK IL tain not to the bodily senses, but to the intellect, among which the science of reasoning and that of number are the chief. The science of reasoning is of very great service in searching into and unravelling all sorts of q^uestions that come up in Scripture, only in the use of itjwe must guard against the love of wrangling, and the childish vanity of entrapping an adversary. For tliere are many of what are called soj^hisms, inferences in reasoning that are false, and yet so close an imitation of the true, as to deceive not only dull people, but clever men too, when they are not on their guard. For example, one man lays before another with whom he is talking, the proposition, " What I am, you are not." The other assents, fur the proposition is in part true, the one man being cunning and the other simple. Then the first speaker adds : " I am a man ; " and when the otlier has given his assent to this also, the first draws his conclusion : " Then you are not a man." Xow of this sort of ensnaring arguments, Scripture, as I judge, expresses detestation in that place where it is said, " Tliere is one that showeth wisdom in words, and is hated ; " ^ although, indeed, a style of speech which is not intended to entrap, but only aims at verbal ornamentation more than is consistent with seriousness of purpose, is also called sophistical. 49. There are also valid processes of reasoning which lead to false conclusions, by following out to its logical conse- quences the error of the man with whom one is arguing; and these conclusions are sometimes drawn by a good and learned man, with the object of making the person from whose error these consequences result, feel ashamed of thenj, and of thus leading him to give up his error, wlien he finds tliat if he wishes to retain his old opinion, he must of necessity also hold other opinions which he condemns. For example, the apostle did not draw true conclusions when he said, " Then is Christ not risen," and again, " Then is our preacliing vain, and your faith is also vain ; " ^ and further on drew other inferences which are all utterly false ; for Clirist has risen, tlie preaching of those who declared tliis fact was not in vain, nor was their faith in 'Qui sopliistii-p Inrjuitur, oJibilis est. Ecclu3. .vxxvii. 20. « 1 Cor. XV. Vi, 14. CHAP. XXXII.] OF LOGICAL RULES. 69 vain who had believed it. But all these false inferences fol- lowed legitimately from the opinion of those who said that there is no resurrection of the dead. These inferences, then, being repudiated as false, it follows that since they would be true if the dead rise not, there will be a resurrection of the dead. As, then, valid conclusions may be drawn not only from true but from false propositions, the laws of valid ^ reasoning may easily be learnt in the schools, outside the pale of the Church. But the truth of propositions must be inquired into in the sacred books of the Church. Chap, xxxii. — Valid logical sequence is not devised hut only observed hy man. 50. And yet the validity of logical sequences is not a^ thing devised by men, but is observed a;nd noted by them that they may be able to learn and teach it ; for it exists eternally in the reason of things, and has its origin with God. For as the man who narrates the order of events does not himself create that order ; and as he who describes the situa- tions of places, or the natures of animals, or roots, or minerals, does not describe arrangements of man ; and as he who points out the stars and their movements does not point out anything that he himself or any other man has ordained ; — in the same way, he who says, " When the consequent is false, the ante- cedent must also be false," says what is most true ; but he does not himself make it so, he only points out that it is so. And it is upon this rule that the reasoning I have quoted from the Apostle Paul proceeds. For the antecedent is, " There is no resurrection of the dead," — the position taken up by those whose error the apostle wished to overthrow. Next, from this antecedent, the assertion, viz., that there is no resur- rection of the dead, the necessary consequence is, " Then Christ is not risen." But this consequence is false, for Christ has risen ; therefore the antecedent is also false. But the antece- dent is, that there is no resurrection of the dead. We con- clude, therefore, that there is a resurrection of the dead. Now all this is briefly expressed thus : If there is no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen ; but Christ is risen, there- fore there is a resurrection of the dead. This rule, then, that when the consequent is removed, the antecedent must also be r 70 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IT. removed, is not made by man, but only pointed out by him. And this rule has reference to the validity of the reasoning, not to the truth of the statements. Chap, xxxiii. — False iriferences may be drawn fiom valid reasonings, and vice vprsa. 51. In this passage, however, where the argument is about the resurrection, both the law of the inference is valid, and tlie conclusion arrived at is true. But in the case of false conclusions, too, there is a validity of inference in some such way as the following. Let us suppose some man to have admitted : If a snail is an animal, it has a voice. Tliis beinjj admitted, then, when it has been proved that the snail has no voice, it follows (since when the consequent is proved false, the antecedent is also false) that the snail is not an animal. Now this cohclusion is false, but it is a true and valid in- ference from the false admission. Thus, the truth of a state- ment stands on its own merits ; the validity of an inference depends on the statement or the admission of the man with whom one is arguing. And thus, as I said above, a false in- ference may be drawn by a valid process of reasoning, in order tliat he whose error we wish to correct may be sorry that he has admitted the antecedent, when he sees that its logical consequences are utterly untenable. And hence it is easy to understand that as the inferences may be valid where the opinions are false, so the inferences may be unsound where the opinions are true. For example, suppose that a man pro- pounds the statement, "If this man is just, he is good," and we admit its truth. Then he adds, " But he is not just ; " and when we admit this too, he draws the conclusion, " Therefore he is not good." Now although every one of these statements may be true, still the principle of the inference is unsound. For it is not true tliat, as when the consequent is proved false the antecedent is also false, so when the antecedent is proved false the consequent is fiilsc. For the statement is true, " If he is an orator, he is a man." But if we add, " He is not an orator," the consequence docs not follow, " He is not a man." Chap, xxxiv. — It is one thing to Inow the latca of inference, another to know the truth of opinions. 52. Therefore it is one thing to know the laws of inference, CHAP. XXXY.] OF THE LAWS OF DEFINITION. Tl and another to know tlie truth of opinions. In the former case we learn what is consequent, what is inconsequent, and what is incompatible. An example of a consequent is, " If he is an orator, he is a man ;" of an inconsequent, " If he is a man, he is an orator ; " of an incompatible, " If he is a man, he is a quadruped." In these instances we judge of the connection. In regard to the truth of opinions, however, we must consider propositions as they stand by themselves, and not in their con- nection with one another ; but when propositions that we are not sure about are joined by a valid inference to propositions that are true and certain, they themselves, too, necessarily be- come certain. Now some, when they have ascertained the validity of the inference, plume themselves as if this involved also the truth of the propositions. Many, again, who hold the true opinions have an unfounded contempt for themselves, be- cause they are ignorant of the laws of inference; whereas the man who knows that there is a resurrection of the dead is assuredly better than the man who only knows that it follows that if there is no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen. Chap. xxxv. — The science of dejinition is not false, though it may he applied to falsities. 53. Again, the science of definition, of division, and of par- tition, although it is frequently applied to falsities, is not itself false, nor framed by man's device, but is evolved from the reason of things. For although poets have applied it to their fictions, and false philosophers, or even heretics — that is, false Christians — to their erroneous doctrines, that is no reason why it should be false, for example, that neither in definition, nor in division, nor in partition, is anything to be included that does not pertain to the matter in hand, nor anything to be omitted that does. This is true, even though the things to be defined or divided are not true. For even falsehood itself is defined when we say that falsehood is the declaration of a state of things which is not as we declare it to be ; and this defini- tion is true, although falsehood itself cannot be true. We can also divide it, saying that there are two kinds of falsehood, one in regard to things that cannot be true at all, the other in regard to tilings that are not, though it is possible they might be, true. For examjjle, the man who says that seven and three y 72 ox CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. are eleven, says what cannot be true under any circumstances ; but lie wlio says that it rained on the kalends of January, aUliough perhaps tlie fact is not so, says wliat possibly might have been. The definition and division, therefore, of what is false may 1x3 perfectly true, although what is false cannot, of course, itself be true. Chap, xxx vi. — The rules of eloquence are true, though sometimes used topersuade men of what is false. 54. There are also certain rules for a more copious kind of argument, which is called eloquence, and these rules are not the less true that they can be used for persuading men of what is false ; but as they can be used to enforce the truth as well, it is not the faculty itself that is to be blamed, but the perversity of those who put it to a bad use. Xor is it owing to an arrangement among men that the exi:)ression of affection conciliates the hearer, or that a narrative, when it is short and clear, is effective, and that variety arrests men's attention without wearying them. And it is the same with other direc- tions of the same kind, which, whether the cause in which they are used be true or false, are themselves true just in so far as they are effective in producing knowledge or belief, or in moving men's minds to desire and aversion. And men rather found out that these things are so, than arranged that they should be so. Chap, xxxvii. — Use of rhetoric and dialectic. 55. This art, however, when it is learnt, is not to be used so much for ascertaining: the meanincr as for settini? forth the meaning when it is ascertained. But the art previously spoken of, which deals with inferences, and definitions, and divisions, is of the greatest assistance in the discovery of the meaning, provided only that men do not fall into the error of supposing that when they have learnt these tilings they have learnt the true secret of a liappy life. Still, it sometimes happens that men find less difficulty in attaining the object for the sake of which these sriencos are learnt, than in going through the very intricate and thorny discipline of such rules. It is just as if a man wishing to give rules for walking should warn you not to lift the hinder foot before you set down the front one, and then should describe minutely the way you ought to move the CHAP. XXXVIII.] OF THE SCIENCE OF NUMBERS. 73 hinges of the joints and knees. Tor what he says is true, and one cannot walk in any other way ; but men find it easier to walk by executing these movements than to attend to them while they are going through them, or to understand when they are told about them. Those, on the other hand, who cannot walk, care still less about such directions, as they cannot prove them by making trial of them. And in the same way a clever man often sees that an inference is unsound more quicldy than he apprehends the rules for it. A dull man, on the other hand, does not see the unsoundness, but much less does he grasp the rules. And in regard to all these laws, we derive more plea- sure from them as exhibitions of truth, than assistance in argu- ing or forming opinions, except perhaps that they put the intellect in better training. We must take care, however, that they do not at the same time make it more inclined to mischief or vanity, — that is to say, that they do not give those who have learnt them an inclination to lead people astray by plausible speech and catching questions, or make them think that they have attained some great thing that gives them an advantage over the good and innocent. Chap, xxxviii. — The science of numbers not created, hut only discovered, by man. 56. Coming now to the science of number, it is clear to the dullest apprehension that this was not created by man, but was discovered by investigation. For, though Virgil could at his own pleasure make the first syllable of Italia long, while the ancients pronounced it short, it is not in any man's powder to determine at his pleasure that three times three are not nine, or do not make a square, or are not the triple of three, nor one and a half times the number six, or that it is not true that they are not the double of any number because odd numbers^ have no half. Whether, then, numbers are considered in them- selves, or as applied to the laws of figures, or of sounds, or of other motions, they have fixed laws which were not made by man, but which the • acuteness of ingenious men brought to light. 57. The man, however, who puts so high a value on these things as to be inclined to boast himself one of the learned, ' Intelligibiles numeri. / 74 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTHINE. [BOOK II. and who does not rather inquire after the source from which those things which he perceives to he true derive their truth, and from wliicli those others which he perceives to he unchange- ahle also derive their truth and unchangeahleness, and who, mounting up Irom hodily appearances to the mind of man, and finding that it too is changeahle (for it is sometimes in- structed, at other times uninstructed), although it holds a middle place hetween the unchangeahle truth ahove it and the changeahle things heneath it, does not strive to make all things redound to the praise and love of the one God from whom he knows that all things have their heing ; — the man, I say, who acts in this way may seem to he learned, hut wise he cannot in any sense he deemed. Chap, xxxix. — To ichlch of Oie above-mentioned studies attention should he fjivtn, and in what sjiirit. 58. Accordingly, I think that it is well to warn studious and ahle young men, who fear God and are seeking for happiness of life, not to venture heedlessly upon the pursuit of the hranches of learning th at are in vogue beyo nd the pale of the Church of Chris t, as if these could seciire for them the happiness they seek ; hut soberly and carefully to discriminate amon g them. And if they find any of those which have been instituted by men varying by reason of the varying pleasure of their founders, and unknown by reason of erroneous con- jectures, especially if they involve entering into fellowship with devils by means of leagues and covenants about signs, let these be utterly rejected and held in detestation. Let the young men also withdraw their attention from such institutions of men as are unnecessary and luxurious. But for the sake of the necessities of this life we must not neglect the arrange- ments of men that enable us to carry on intercourse with those around us. I think, however, there is nothing useful in the other branches of learning that are found among the heathen, except information about objects, either past or present, that relate to the bodily senses, in which are included also the experiments and conclusions of the useful mechanical arts, except also the sciences of reasoning and of number. And in regard to all these we must hold by the maxim, " Not too much of anything ; " especially in the case of those which, per- CHAP. XL.] .HOW FAR SCIENCE IS NECESSARY. 75 taining as they do to the senses, are subject to the relations of space and time.^ 59. What, then, some men have done in regard to all words and names found in Scripture, in the Hebrew, and Syriac, and Egyptian, and other tongues, taking up and interpreting sepa- rately such as were left in Scripture without interpretation ; and what Eusebius has done in regard to the history of the past with a view to the questions arising in Scripture that require a knowledge of history for their solution ; — what, I say, these men have done in regard to matters of this kind, making it unnecessary for the Christian to spend his strength on many subjects for the sake of a few items of knowledge, the same, I think, might be done in regard to other matters, if any com- petent man were willing in a spirit of benevolence to under- take the labour for the advantage of his brethren. In this way he might arrange in their several classes, and give an account of the unknown places, and animals, and plants, and trees, and stones, and metals, and other species of things that are mentioned in Scripture, taking up these only, and commit- ting his account to writing. This might also be done in relation to numbers, so that the theory of those numbers, and those only, which are mentioned in Holy Scripture, might be explained and written down. And it may happen that some or all of these things have been done already (as I have found that many things I had no notion of have been worked out and committed to writing by good and learned Christians), but are either lost amid the crowds of the careless, or are kept out of sight by the envious. And I am not sure whether the same thing can be done in regard to the theory of reasoning ; but it seems to me it cannot, because this runs like a system of nerves through the whole structure of Scripture, and on that account is of more service to the reader in disen- tangling and explaining ambiguous passages, of which I shall speak hereafter, than in ascertaining the meaning of unknown signs, the topic I am now discussing. Chap. xl. — Whatever has heeji rlrjhtly said hy the heathen^ we must appropriate to our uses. GO. jMoreover, if those who are called philosophers, and ^ JVe quid 7iimis. — Terence, Andria, act i. scene 1. y/ V6 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK II. especially the Platonists, have said aught that is true and in harmony with our fiiith, we are not only not to shrink from it, but to claim it for our own use from those who have unlawful possessio n of i t. For, as the Egyptians had not only the idols and heavy burdens which the people of Israel hated and fled from, but also vessels and ornaments of g(jld and silver, atid garments, which the same people when going out of Egypt appropriated to themselves, designing them for a better use, not doing this on their own authority, but by the command of God, the Egyptians themselves, in their ignorance, providing them with things which they themselves were not making a good use of/ in the same way all branches of heathen learn- ing have not only false and superstitious fancies and heavy burdens of unnecessary toil, which every one of us, when going out under the leadership of Christ from the fellowship of the heathen, ought to abhor and avoid ; but they contain also liberal instruction which is better adapted to the use of the truth, and some most excellent precepts of morality ; and some truths in regard even to the worship of the One God are found among them. Now these are, so to speak, their gold and silver, which they did not create themselves, but dug out of the mines of God's providence which are every wdiere scattered abroad, and are perversely and unlawfully prostituting to the worship of devils. These, therefore, the Christian, when he separates himself in spirit from the miserable fellowship of these men, ought to take away from them, and to devote to their proper use in preaching the gospel. Their garments, also, — that is, human institutions such as are adapted to that inter- course with men which is indispensable in this life, — we must take and turn to a Christian use. 61. And what else have many good and faithful men among our brethren done ? Do we not see with what a quantity ol gold and silver and garments Cyprian, that most persuasive teacher and most blessed martyr, was loaded when he came out of Egypt ? How much Lactantius brought with him ! And Yictorinus, and Optatus, and Hilary, not to speak of living men ! How much Greeks out of number have borrowed ! And prior to all these, tliat most faithful servant of God, » Ex. iii. 21, 22. xii. 35, 36. CHAP. XLI.] HUMILITY ESSENTIAL TO PROGRESS. 77 Moses, liad done the same thing ; for of him it is written that he was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians.-^ And to none of all these w^ould heathen superstition (especially in those times when, kicking against the yoke of Christ, it was perse- cuting the Christians) have ever furnished branches of know- ledge it held useful, if it had suspected they were about to turn them to the use of worshipping the One God, and thereby overturning the vain worship of idols. But they gave their gold and their silver and their garments to the people of God, as they were going out of Egypt, not knowing how the things they gave would be turned to the service of Christ. For what w^as done at the time of the exodus was no doubt a type pre- figuring what happens now. And this I say without prejudice to any other interpretation that may be as good, or better. CHAr. XLI. — What kind of sjnrit is required for the study of Holy Scripture. 62. But wdien the student of the Holy Scriptures, prepared in the w^ay I have indicated, shall enter upon his investigations, let him constantly meditate upon that saying of the apostle's, " Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth."^ For so he will feel that, whatever may be the riches he brings with him out of Egypt, yet unless he has kept the passover, he cannot be safe. Now Christ is our passover sacrificed for us,^ and there is nothing the sacrifice of Christ more clearly teaches us than the call which He himself addresses to those whom He sees toiling in Egypt under Pharaoh : " Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me ; for I am meek and lowly in heart : and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light."* To whom is it light but to the meek and lowly in heart, whom knowdedge doth not puff up, but charity edifieth ? Let them remember, then, that those who celebrated the passover at that time in type and shadow, wdien they were ordered to mark their door-posts wdth the blood of the lamb, used hyssop to mark them with.^ Now this is a meek and lowly herb, and yet nothing is stronger and more penetrating than its roots ; that being rooted and grounded » Acts vii. 22. ' 1 Cor. viil. 1. 3 j Cor. v. 7. * Matt. xi. 28-30. ^ Ex. xii. 22. 78 ON CIIRISTIA.X DOCTRINT. [BOOK U in love, we may be able to comprebeud with aU saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height,^ — that is, to comprehend the cross of our Lord, the breadth of which is in- dicated by the transverse wood on which the hands are stretched, its length by the part from the ground up to the cross-bar on which the whole body from the head downwards is fixed, its height by the part from the cross-bar to the top on which the head lies, and its depth by the part which is hidden, being fixed in the earth. And by this sign of the cross all Chris- tian action is symbolized, viz. to do good works in Christ, to cling with constancy to Him, to hope for heaven, and not to desecrate the sacraments. And purified by this Christian action, we shall be able to know even "the love of Christ which passeth knowledge," who is equal to the Father, by whom all things were made, " that we may be filled with all the fulness of God."^ There is besides in hyssop a purgative virtue, that the breast may not be swollen with that know- ledge which puffeth up, nor boast vainly of the riches brought out from Egypt. " Purge me with hyssop," the psalmist says,^ " and I shall be clean ; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow. Make me to hear joy and gladness." Then he imme- diately adds, to show that it is purifying from pride that is indicated by hyssop, " that the bones which Thou hast broken* may rejoice." Chap. xlii. — Sacred Scripture compared with profane authors, 63. But just as poor as the store of gold and silver and garments which the people of Israel brought with them out of Egypt was in comparison with the riches which they after- wards attained at Jerusalem, and which reached their height in the reign of King Solomon, so poor is all the useful know- hnlge which is gathered from the books of the heathen when compared with the knowledge of Ploly Scripture. For what- ever man mav have learnt from other sources, if it is hurtful, _M i ^ it is there c ondemned ; if it is useful, it is th erein contained. And while every man may find there all that he has learnt of useful elsewhere, he will iind there in much greater abundance » Eph. iii. 17, 18. 'Kj.h. iii. 19. ^ Fs. li. 7, 8. "• 0."a humiiiata, Vulgate. CHAP. XLII.] CONCLUSION. 79 tliingjs that are to be found nowhere else, but can be learnt only in the wonderful sublimity and wonderful simplicity of the Scriptures. When, then, the reader is possessed of the instruction here pointed out, so that unknown signs have ceased to be a hindrance to him ; when he is meek and lowly of heart, sub- ject to the easy yoke of Christ, and loaded with His light burden, rooted and grounded and built up in Mth, so that dJiitAl^ knowledge cannot puff him up, let him then approach the consideration and discussion of ambiguous signs in Scripture. And about these I shall now, in a third book, endeavour to say what the Lord shall be pleased to vouchsafe. 80 ON CIIRISTLVN DOCTRINE. [BOOK III. LOOK T II I li D. ARGUMENT. THE AUTHOR, HAVING DISCUSSED IN THE PRECEDING BOOK THE METHOD OP DEALING WITH UNKNOWN SIGNS, GOES ON IN THIS THIRD BOOK TO TREAT OF AMBIGUOUS SIGNS. SUCH SIGNS MAY BE EITHER DIRECT OR FIGURATIVE. IN THE CASE OF DIRECT SIGNS AMBIGUITY MAY ARISE FROM THE PUNCTUA- TION, THE PRONUNCIATION, OR THE DOUBTFUL SIGNIFICATION OF THE WORDS, AND IS TO BE RESOLVED BY ATTENTION TO THE CONTEXT, A COM- PARISON OF TRANSLATIONS, OR A REFERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL TONGUE. IN THE CASE OF FIGURATIVE SIGNS WE NEED TO GUARD AGAINST TWO MISTAKES:—!. THE INTERPRETING LITERAL EXPRESSIONS FIGURATIVELY; 2. THE INTERPRETING FIGURATI VE EXPRE SSIONS LITERALLY. THE AUTHOK LAYS DOWN RULES BY WHICH WE MAY DECIDE WHETHER AN EXPRESSION IS LITERAL OR FIGURATIVE ; THE GENERAL RULE BEING, THAT WHATEVER CAN BE SHOWN TO BE IN ITS LITERAL SENSE INCONSISTENT EITHER WITH PURITY OF LIFE OR CORRECTNESS OF DOCTRINE MUST^E TAKEN FIGURA- TIVELY. HE THEN GOES ON TO LAY DOWN RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF EXPRESSIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN PROVED TO BE FIGURATIVE; THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE BEING, THAT NO INTERPRETATION CAN BE TRUE WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE THE LOVE OF GOD AND THE LOVE OF MAN. THE AUTHOR THEN PROCEEDS TO EXPOUND AND ILLUSTRATE THE SEVEN RULES OF TICHONIUS THE DONATIST, WHICH HE COMMENDS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE STUDENT OF HOLY SCRIPTURE. CliAP. I. — Sunnnary of tlie foregoing hooks, nnd scope of that which follows. 1. nnilE man who fea rs God se eks diligently in Holy Scrip- I tare for a kno\vled«j;e of His wi ll. And when he has become meek through piety, so as to have no love of strife ; when furnished also with a knowledge of languages, so as not to be sto})ped by unknown words and forms of speech, and with the knowledge of certain necessary objects, so as not to be ignorant of the force and nature of those which are used figuratively ; and assisted, besides, by accuracy in the texts, whicli has been secured by skill and care in the matter of correction ; — when tlius prepared, let him proceed to the exa- mination and solution of the ambiguities of Scripture. And that he may not be led astray by ambiguous signs, so far as I can give him instruction (it may happen, however, that either from the gi-eatness of his intellect, or the greater clearness of CHAP. II.] A^IBIGUITIES OF PUNCTUATION. 8 1 tlie light he enjo3^s, he shall laugh at the methods I am going to point out as childish), — but yet, as I was going to say, so far as I can give instruction, let him who is in such a state of mind that he can be instructed by me know, that the ambiguity of Scripture lies e^therjin proper words or in metaphorical, classes which I have already described in the second book/ Chap. ii. — Rule for removing ambiguity hy attending to punctuation. 2. But when proper words make Scripture ambiguous, we must see in the first place that there is nothing wrong in our punctuation or pronunciation. Accordingly, if, w^hen attention is given to the passage, it shall appear to be uncertain in what way it ought to be punctuated or pronounced, let the reader consult the rule of faith which he has gathered from the plainer passages of Scripture, and from the authority of the Church, and of which I treated at sufficient length when I was speaking in the first book about things. But if both readings, or all of them (if there are more than two), give a meaning in harmony with the faith, it remains to consult the context, both what goes before and what comes after, to see which interpretation, out of many that ojBTer themselves, it pronounces for and permits to be dovetailed into itseK. 3. Now look at some examples. The heretical pointing,^ " In principio erat xerhum, et verlum erat apud Deuiii, et Deus crat," ^ so as to make the next sentence run, " Vcrhum hoc erat in principio apud Deum" * arises out of unwillingness to confess that the "Word was God. But this must be rejected by the rule of faith, which, in reference to the equality of the Trinity, directs us to say : " ct Dcus erat vcrhum ;'' ^ and then to add : " hoc erat in principio apud Deumr ^ 4. But the following ambiguity of punctuation does not go against the faith in either way you take it, and therefore must be decided from the context. It is where the apostle says : " What I shall choose I wot not : for I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ, which * See Book ii. chap. x. "^Zoixw i. 1, 2. ^ In tlie beginning was tlie "Word, and the "Word was with God, and God was. * This Word was in the heginning with God. ' And the "Word was God. ^ The same was in the beginning witli God. CHR. DOCT. 'S 82 ON cnrvTSTiAN DOcrrjXE. [book m. is far better : nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you." ^ Xow it is uncertain whether we should read, " ex cludbus concuinsccntiam liahcns" [having a desire for two things], or " compcllor autcm ex duohiis " [I am in a strait betwixt two] ; and so to add : " concupiscent iam hahcns clissohi, ct esse cum Christo" [having a desire to depart, and to be mth Christ]. But since there follows " midto enim magis opti- onum " [for it is far better], it is evident that he says he has a desire for that which is better ; so that, while he is in a strait betwixt two, yet he has a desire for one and sees a necessity for the other ; a desire, viz., to be with Christ, and a necessity to remain in the flesh. IS'ow this ambiguity is resolved by one word that follows, which is translated enim [for] ; and the translators who have omitted this particle have preferred the interpretation which makes the apostle seem not only in a strait betwixt two, but also to have a desire for two.^ We must therefore punctuate the sentence thus : " et quid eligam ignoro: compcllor autcm ex cluohiis" [what I shall choose I wot not : for I am in a strait betwixt two] ; and after this point follows : " concupiscentiam hahcns clissolvi, et esse cum Christo" [liaving a desire to depart, and to be with Christ]. And, as if he were asked why he has a desire for this in prefer- ence to the other, he adds : " multo enim magis optimum " [for it is far better]. Why, then, is he in a strait betwixt the two ? Because there is a need for his remaining, which he adds in tliese terms : " manerc in came necessari^tm propter vos " [never- theless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you]. 5. Where, however, the ambiguity cannot be cleared up, either by the rule of faith or by the context, there is nothing to hinder us to point the sentence according to any method we choose of those that suggest themselves. As is the case in that passage to the Corinthians : " Having there- fore thjse promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. Receive us ; we have wronged no man." ^ It is doubtful whether we should read, mundcmus nos ah omni ' riiil. i. 22-24. ' Tho Vulgnte reatls, mullo magis vieliiis, omitting the eninu »2Cor. vii. 1, 2. CHAP. III.] A:\rBIGUITIES OF PEONUXCIATIOX. 83 coinqiiinationc carnis ct spiritus " [let us cleanse ourselves from all filtliiness of the flesh and spirit], in accordance with the passage, " that she may be holy both in body and in spirit," ^ or, " miindcmus nos ah omni coinquinationc carnis " [let us cleanse ourselves from all filtliiness of the flesh], so as to make the next sentence, " ct spiritus perficientcs sanctijicationcm in timorc Dei ccqnte nos " [and perfecting holiness of spirit in the fear of God, receive us]. Such ambiguities of punctua- tion, therefore, are left to the reader's discretion. CuAP. III. — Hoio ijronnndation serves to remove ainhiguity. Different hinds of interrogation. 6. And .all the directions that I have given about am- biguous punctuations are to be observed likewise in the case of doubtful pronunciations. For these too, unless the fault lies in the carelessness of the reader, are corrected either by the rule of faith, or by a reference to the preceding or succeeding context; or if neither of these methods is applied with success, they will remain doubtful, but so that the reader will not be in fault in whatever way he may pronounce them. For example, if our faith that God will not bring any charges against His elect, and that Christ will not condemn His elect, did not stand in the way, this passage, " Who shall lay any- thing to the charge of God's elect ? " might be pronounced in such a way as to make what follows an answer to this ques- tion, " God who justifieth," and to make a second question, " Who is he that condemneth ? " with the answer, " Christ Jesus who died."^ But as it would be the height of madness to believe this, the passage will be pronounced in such a way as to make the first part a question of inquiry,^ and the second a rhetorical interrogative.* Now the ancients said that the difference between an inquiry and an interrogative was this, that an inquiry admits of many answers, but to an in- terrogative the answer must be either " No " or " Yes."^ The passage will be pronounced, then, in such a way that after the inquiry, " Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect ? " what follows will be put as an interrogative : " Shall * 1 Cor. vii. 34. ^ jjom. viii. 33, 34. 3 Percontatio. ■* Interrogatio. ^ Tlie English language has no two words expressing the shades of meaning assigned by Augustine to x>ercontatlo and interrOQcUio respectively. 84 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRixi:. [book hi. God who jiistifieth ? " — the answer " No " being understood. And in the same way we shall have the inquiry, " Who is he that condcmneth ? " and the answer here again in the form of an interrogative, " Is it Christ who died ? yea, rather, who is risen again ? who is even at the right hand of God ? who also maketh intercession for us ? " — the answer " Xo " being •understood to every one of these questions. On the other hand, in that passage where the apostle says, " AVhat shall we say then ? That the Gentiles which followed not after righteousness have attained to righteousness ; "^ unless after the inquiry, " What shall we say then ? " what follows were given as the answer to this question : " That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteous- ness ; " it would not be in harmony with the succeeding context. But with Avhatever tone of voice one may choose to jironounce that saying of Nathanael's, " Can any good thing come out of Nazareth ? "* — whether with that of a man who gives an affirmative answer, so tliat " out of Nazareth " is the only part that belongs to the interrogation, or with that of a man who asks the whole question with doubt and hesitation, — I do not see how a difference can be made. But neither sense is opposed to faith. 7. There is, again, an ambiguity arising out of the doubtful sound of syllables ; and this of course has relation to pronun- ciation. For example, in the passage, " My bone [os maim] was not hid from Thee, which Thou didst make in secret,"^ it is not clear to the reader whether he should take tlie word os as short or long. If he make it short, it is the singular of ossa [bones] ; if he make it long, it is the singular of ora [mouths]. Now difficulties such as this are cleared up by looking into the original tongue, for in tlie Greek we find not arofia [mouth], but uareov [bone]. And fur this reason the vulgar idiom is freq\iently more useful in convoying the sense tlian the pure speecli of the educated. For I would rather have the barbarism, non est ahsconditum a tc ossum mcum^ than have ' I^oni. ix. 30. ' .Tnlin i. 17. ' P.S. cxxxix. 16. "My substnncc wns not hid from Thee whcu 1 was made in secret" (A.V.). * My bone was not hid from Thee, i CIIAr. IV.] AMBIGUITIES SOLVED BY THE CONTEXT. 85 the passage in better Latin, but the sense less clear. But sometimes when the sound of a syllable is doubtful, it is decided by a word near it belonging to the same sentence. As, for example, that saying of the apostle, " Of the which I tell you before [p?TtYZ^co], as I have also told you in time past [prcedixi], that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." ^ N"ow if he had only said, " Of the which I tell you before [qucc 2^rcvcUco xohis\'' and had not added, " as I have also told you in time past [sicut prcedixi],'* we could not know without going back to the original whether in the word prcedico the middle syllable should be pronounced long or short. But as it is, it is clear that it should be pronounced long ; for he does not say, sicut jprcedicavi, but sicut jprcedixi. Chap, iv, — How ambiguities may he solved. 8. And not only these, but also those ambiguities that do not relate either to punctuation or pronunciation, are to be examined in the same way. For example, that one in the Epistle to the Thessalonians : Proioterea consolati sumus fratres in vobis? Now it is doubtful whether fratres [brethren] is in the vocative or accusative case, and it is not contrary to faith to take it either way. But in the Greek language the two cases are not the same in form; and accordingly, when we look into the original, the case is shown to be vocative. Now if the translator had cliosen to say, proptcrca consolationcm hctbuimus fratres in vobis, he would have followed the words less literally, but there would have been less doubt about the meaning ; or, indeed, if he had added nostri, hardly any one would have doubted that the vocative case was meant when he heard jpropterea consolati siimns fratres nostri in vohis. But this is a rather dangerous liberty to take. It has been taken, however, in that passage to the Corinthians, where the apostle says, " I protest by your rejoicing [2Jer vestram gloriam] which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily." ^ Por one translator has it, ^;c?' vestram juro gloriam, the form of adjura- tion appearing in the Greek without any ambiguity. It is 1 Gal. V. 21. 2 1 Thess. iii. 7. " Therefore, brethren, we were comforted over you" (A. V.). "" 1 Cor. XV. 31. S6 ON CIiniSTIAN DOCTEHsE. [BOOK III therefore very rare and very diflicult to find any ambiguity in the case of proper words, as far at least as Holy Scripture is concerned, which neither the context, showing the design of the writer, nor a comparison of translations, nor a reference to the original tongue, will suffice to explain. CiiAi'. V. — It is a wretched slavery which takes the fifjuraXive expressions of Scripture in a literal sense. 9. But the ambiguities of metaphorical words, about which I am next to speak, demand no ordinary care and diligence. In the first place, we must beware of taking a figurative ex- pression literally. For the saying of^ the apostle applies in this case too : " The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." ^ For when what is said figm-atively is taken as if it w^ere said literally, it is understood in a carnal manner. And nothing is more fittingly called the death of the soul tlian when that in it which raises it above the brutes, the intelligence namely, is put in subjection to the flesh by a blind adherence to the letter. For he who follows the letter takes figurative words as if they were proper, and does not carry out what is indicated by a proper word into its secondary signification ; but, if he hears of the Sabbath, for example, thinks of nothing but the one day out of seven which recurs in constant succession ; and when he hears of a sacrifice, does not carry his thoughts beyond the customary ofierings of victims from the flock, and of the fruits of the earth. Now it is surely a miserable slavery of the soul to take signs for things, and to be^ unable to lift tlie eye of the mind above what is corporeal and created, that it may drink in eternal light Chap. yi. — Utility of the bomlaje of the Jews. 10. This bondage, however, in the case of the Jewish people, differed widely from what it was in the case of the other nations ; because, thougli the former were in bondage to temporal things, it was in such a way that in all these the One Gud was put before their minds. And although they paid attention to the signs of spiritual realities in place of the realities themselves, not knowing to wliat the si.L,nis referred, still they had tliis con- viction rooted in theii' minds, tliat in subjecting themselves to > 2 Cor. iii. G. CHAP. YII.] BONDAGE TO THE LETTER. 87 snch a "bondage they were doing tlie pleasure of the one in- visible God of all. And the apostle describes this bondage as being like to that of boys under the guidance of a schoolmaster.^ And those who clung obstinately to such signs could not en- dure our Lord's neglect of them when the time for their revela- tion had come ; and lience their leaders brought it as a charge against Him that He healed on the Sabbath, and the people, clinging to these signs as if they were realities, could not be- lieve that one who refused to observe them in the way the Jews did was God, or came from God. But those who did believe, from among whom the first Church at Jerusalem was formed, showed clearly how great an advantage it had been to be so guided by the schoolmaster that signs, which had been for a season imposed on the obedient, fixed the thoughts of those who observed them on the w^orship of the One God who made heaven and earth. These men, because they had been very near to spiritual things (for even in the temporal and car- nal offerings and types, though they did not clearly apprehend their spiritual meaning, they had learnt to adore the One Eternal God), were filled with such a measure of the Holy Spirit that they sold all their goods, and laid their price at the apostles' feet to be distributed among the needy ,^ and conse- crated themselves wholly to God as a new temple, of which the old temple they were serving was but the earthly type. 11. IsTow it is not recorded that any of the Gentile churches did this, because men who had for their gods idols made with hands had not been so near to spiritual things. Chap. vii. — The useless homlage of the Gentiles. And if ever any of them endeavoured to make it out that their idols were only signs, yet still they used them in refer- ence to the worship and adoration of the creature. What dif- ference does it make to me, for instance, that the ima^e of Neptune is not itself to be considered a god, but only as repre- senting the wide ocean, and all the other waters besides that spring out of fountains ? As it is described by a poet of theirs,'*^ ^ Gal. iii. 24. The word Taitayuycs means strictly not a schoolmaster, bi;t a servant who takes children to schooL 2 Acts iv. 34, 35. 3 Claudian. 88 ox CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [dOOK III. who says, if I recollect aright, " Thou, Father Neptune, whose hoary temples are wreathed with the resounding sea, whose beard is the inii^dity ocean lluwini,^ forth unceasingly, and whose hair is the winding rivers." This liusk sh akes its rattlin g stones within a sweet covering, and yet it is not food for men, but for swine^ He who knows the gospel knows what I mean.^ What profit is it to me, then, that the image of Neptune is used with a reference to this explanation of it, unless indeed the result be that I worship neither ? For any statue you like to take is as much god to me as the wide ocean. I gi-ant, how- ever, that they who make gods of tlie works of man have sunk lower than they who make gods of the works of God. But the command is that we should love and serve the One God, who is the ]\Iaker of all those things, the images of which are w^orshipped by the heathen either as gods, or as signs and repre- sentations of gods. If, then, to take a sign which has been established for a useful end instead of the tiling itself which it was designed to signify, is bondage to the flesh, how much more so is it to take signs intended to represent useless things for the things themselves ! For even if you go back to the very things signified by such signs, and engage your mind in the worship of these, you will not be an}'thing the more free from the burden and the livery of bondage to the flesh. Chap. viii. — The Jews liberated from their bondage in one way, the Gentiles in another. 1 2. Accordingly the liberty that comes by Christ took those whom it found under bondage to useful signs, and who were (so to speak) near to it, and, interpreting the signs to which they were in bondage, set _tliem free by raising tliem to the realities of wliic h tliese wer e si^ns. And out of such were formed the churches of the saints of Israel. Those, on tho otlier liand, whom it found in bondage to useless signs, it not only freed from their slavery to such signs, but brought to nothing and cleared out of the way all these signs themselves, so that the Gentiles were turned from the corruption of a mul- titude of false gods, which Scripture frequently and justly speaks of as fornication, to the worship of the One God : not that they might now fall into bondage to signs of a useful kind, > Luke XV. 16. CHAP. X.] BONDAGE TO THE LETTER. 89 but rather that they might exercise their minds in the spiritual understanding of such. Chap. ix. — Who is in bondage to signs, and who not. 13. l^Tow he is in bond a ge to a si gn who uses, or pays homage to, any significant object without knowing what it signifies : he, on the other hand, who either uses or honours a useful sign divinely appointed, whose force and significance he understands, does not honour the sign which is seen and tem- poral, but that to whjxih all such signs refer. Now such a man is spiritual and free even at the time of his bondage, when it is not yet expedient to reveal to carnal minds those signs by subjection to which their carnality is to be overcome. To this class of spiritual persons belonged the patriarchs and the pro- phets, and all those among the people of Israel through whose instrumentality the Holy Spirit ministered unto us the aids and consolations of the Scriptures. But at the present time, after that the proof of our liberty has shone forth so clearly in the resurrection of our Lord, we are not oppressed with the heavy burden of attending even to those signs which we now understand, but our Lord Himself, and apostolic practice, have handed down to us a few rites in place of many, and these at once very easy to perform, most majestic in their significance, and most sacred in the observance ; such, for example, as the sacrament of baptism, and the celebration of the body and blood of the Lord. And as soon as any one looks upon these ob- servances he knows to what they refer, and so reveres them not in carnal bondage, but in spiritual freedom. Now, as to follow the letter, and to take sims for the thinG:s that are si^-ni- fied by them, is a mark of weakness and bondage ; so to inter- pret signs wrongly is the result of being misled by error. He, however, who does not understand what a sign signifies, but yet knows that it is a sign, is not in bondage. And it is better even to be in bondage to unknown but useful signs than, by interpreting them wrongly, to draw the neck from under the yoke of bondage only to insert it in the coils of error. Chap. x. — TToio ice are to discern whether a j^hra.'^e is figurative. 14. But in addition to the foresroin^ rule, which guards us 00 ON CIirvISTIAN DOCTrJNE. [BOOK HI. against taking a metaphorical form of speech as if it -were literal, ^ve must also pay heed to that which tells us not to take a literal form of speech as if it were figurative. In the first place, then, we must show the way to fmd out whether a phrase is literal or figurative. And the way is certainly as follows : (Whatever there is in the word of God that cannot, when taken literally, he referred either to purity of life or soundness of doctrine, you may set down as figurative. Purity of life has reference to the love of God and one's neighbour ; soundness of doctrine to the knowledge of God and one's neighbour. / Every man, moreover, has hope in his own con- science, so far as he perceives that he has attained to the love and knowled<:je of God and his neidibour. Now all these matters have been spoken of in the first book. 15. But as men are prone to estimate sins, not by reference to their inherent sinfulness, but rather by reference to their own customs, it frequently liappens that a man will think nothing blameable except what the men of his ovna. country and time are accustomed to condemn, and nothing worthy of praise or approval except what is sanctioned by the custom of his companions ; and thus it comes to pass, that if Scripture either enjoins what is opposed to the customs of the hearers, or condemns what is not so opposed, and if at the same time the authority of the word has a hold upon their minds, they think that the expression is figurative. Kow Scripture enjoins \/ nothing except charity, and condemns nothing except lust, and in that way fashions the lives of men. In the same way, if an eiToneous opinion has taken possession of the mind, men think that whatever Scripture asserts contrary to this must be figurative. Kow Scripture asserts nothing but the catholic faith, in regard to things past, future, and present. It is a naiTative of the past, a prophecy of the futiu-e, and a description of the present. But aU these tend to nourish and strengthen charity, and to overcome and root out lust. I 16. I mean by charity tliat affection of the mind wliich ' aims at the enjoyment of God for Ilis own sake, and the enjoyment of one's se lf and one's ncijjhhour in subordination to God ; by lust I mean that affection of the mind which aims at enjoying one's self and one's neighbour, and other corporeal CHAP. XL] THE IXTERPEETATION OF FIGURES. 91 tilings, without reference to God. Again, wliat lust, when unsubdued, does towards corrupting one's own soul and body, is called vice ;^ but what it does to injure another is called crime? And these are the two classes into which all sins may be divided. But the vices come first ; for when these have exhausted the soul, and reduced it to a kind of poverty, it easily slides into crimes, in order to remove hindrances to, or to find assistance in, its vices. In the same way, what charity does with a view to one's own advantage is lorudcnce ; but what it does with a view to a neighbour's advantage is called Vcncvolcncc. And here prudence comes first ; because no one can confer an advantage on another which he does not himself possess. Now in proportion as the dominion of lust is pulled down, in the same proportion is that of charity built up. Chap. xi. — Rule for interpreting i^hrases which seem to ascribe severity to God and the saints. 17. Every severity, therefore, and apparent cruelty, either in word or deed, that is ascribed in Holy Scripture to God or His saints, avails to the pulling down of the dominion of lust. And if its meaning be clear, we are not to give it some secondary reference, as if it were spoken figuratively. Take, for example, that saying of the apostle : " But, after thy hard- ness and impenitent heart, treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judg- ment of God ; who will render to every man according to his deeds : to them who, by patient continuance in w^ell-doing, seek for glory, and honour, and immortality, eternal life ; but unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile."^ But this is addressed to those who, being unwilling to subdue their lust, are them- selves involved in the destruction of their lust. When, how- ever, the dominion of lust is overturned in a man over whom it had held sway, this plain expression is used : " They that are Christ's have crucified the flesh, with the affections and lu stg." ^ Only that, even in these instances, some words are used figuratively, as for example, " the wrath of God " and 1 Flasitium. ^ Facinus. 3 n^^^^. ii. 5-9. * Cuil. v. 24. 92 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IH. '•' crucified." But these are not so numerous, nor placed in such a way as to obscure the sense, aud make it alle^orical_ or enigmatical, which is the kind of expression properly called fi/jurativc. But Tn the saying addressed to Jeremiah, " See, I have^this day set thee over the nations, and over the king- doms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down,"^ there is no doubt the whole of the language is figurative, and to be referred to the end I have spoken of. CUAP. XII. — Buh for interpreting those sayings and actions rrhich are ascribed to God and the mints, and which yet seem to the unskilful to be wicked. 18. Those things, again, whether only sayings or whether actual deeds, which appear to the inexperienced to be sinful, aud which are ascribed to God, or to men whose holiness is put before us as an example, are wholly figurative, and the hidden kernel of meaning they contain is to be picked out as food for the nourishment of charity. Xow, whoever uses transitory objects less freely than is the custom of those among whom he lives, is either temperate or superstitious ; whoever, on the other hand, uses them so as to transgress the bounds of the custom of the good men about him, either has a further meaning in what he does, or is sinful. In all such matters it is not the use of the objects, but the lust of the user, that is to blame. Nobody in his sober senses would believe, for example, that when our Lord's feet were anointed by the woman with precious ointment,^ it was for the same purpose for wliich luxurious and profligate men are accustomed to have theirs anointed in tliose banquets which we abhor. For the swee t odour means the good report whic h is earned by a life o f good works ; and the man who wins this, wliile follow- ing in the footsteps of Clirist, anoints His feet (so to speak) with the most precious ointment. And so that which in the case of other persons is often a sin, becomes, when ascribed to God or a prophet, tlie sig n of some great truth. Keeping company with a harlot, for example, is one thing when it is the result of abandoned manners, another thing when done in the course of his propliecy by the prophet Hosea.^ Because it is a shamefully wicked thing to strip the body naked at a 1 Jci. i. 10. ' Johu xii. 3. ' Hos. i. 2. CHAP. XII.] THE OLD DISPENSATION FIGUEATIYE. 93 banquet among the drunken and licentious, it does not follow that it is a sin to be naked in the baths. 19. We must, therefore, consider carefully what is suitable to times and places and persons, and not rashly charge men with sins. For it is possible that a wise man may use the daintiest food without any sin of epicurism or gluttony, while a fool will crave for the vilest food with a most disgusting eagerness of appetite. And any sane man would prefer eating fish after the manner of our Lord, to eating lentiles after the manner of Esau, or barley after the manner of oxen. For there are several beasts that feed on commoner kinds of food, but it does not follow that they are more temperate than we are. For in all matters of this kind it is not the nature of the things we use, but our reason for using them, and our manner of seeking them, that make what we do either praise- worthy or blameable. 20. JSTowjthesaints^of ancient times were, under the form of an earthly kingdom, foreshadowing and foretelling the king- dom of heaven. And on account of the necessity for a nu- merous offspring, the custom of one man having several wives was at that time blameless : and for the same reason it was not proper for one woman to have several husbands, because a woman does not in that w^ay become more fruitful, but, on the contrary, it is base harlotry to seek either gain or offspring by promiscuous intercourse. In regard to matters of this sort, whatever the holy men of those times did without lust, Scrip- ture passes over without blame, although they did things which could not be done at the present time, except through lust. And everything of this nature that is there narrated we are to take not only i n its historical and literal, but also in its figurative and prophetical sense, and to interpret as bearing ultimately upon the end of love towards God or our neighbour, or both. For as it was disgraceful among the ancient Eomans to wear tunics reaching to the heels, and furnished with sleeves, but now it is disgraceful for men honourably born not to wear tunics of that description : so we must take heed in regard to other things also, that lust do not mix with our use of them ; for lust not only abuses to wicked ends the customs of those among whom we live, but frequently also transgressing the 94 ox CHRISTIAN DOCTnixE. [book in. bounds of custom, betrays, in a disgraceful outbreak, its own hideousness, which was concealed under the cover of prevail- ing fashions. CnAP. xin. — Same suhjtct continued. 2 1 . A^HiatGver, then, is in accordance with the habits of those with whom we are either compelled by necessity, or undertake as a matter of duty, to spend this life, is to be turned by good and great men to some prudent or benevolent end, either directly, as is our duty, or figuratively, as is allowable to prophets. Chap. xiv. — Error of those lolio tlnnJc that tJiere is no alsolute rijht and lorong, 22. But when men unacquainted with other modes of life than their own meet with the record of such actions, unless they are restrained by authority, they look upon them as sins, and do not consider that their own customs either in regard to marriage, or feasts, or dress, or the other necessities and adorn- ments of human life, appear sinful to the people of other nations and other times. And, distracted by this endless variety of customs, some who were half asleep (as I may say) — that is, who were neither sunk in the deep sleep of folly, nor were able to awake into the li 1 Pet. V. 8. a Matt. x. 16. '2 Cor. xi. 3. *.Iolm vi. 51. ' Trov. ix. 17. * Ts. Ixxv. S. ^Kev. xvii. 15.' •John vii. ' Gen. X. 20. ^ Gen. x. 31. ' Gen. x. 32, xi. 1. < Luke xvii. 29-32. CHAP. XXXVII.] SEVENTH RULE OF TICHONIUS. 117 receive liis reward according to the things he has given heed to or despised ? And yet because Scripture says, " In that day," the time of the revelation of the Lord will be thought the time for giving heed to these sayings, unless the reader be watchful and intelligent so as to understand the recapitulation, in which he will be assisted by that other passage of Scripture which even in the time of the apostles proclaimed : " Little children, it is the last time." ^ The very time then when the gospel is preached, up to the time that the Lord shall be revealed, is the day in which men ought to give heed to these sayings : for to the same day, which shall be brought to a close by a day of judgment^ belongs that very revelation of the Lord here spoken of. ^ Chap, xxxvii.— TAe seventh rule of Tichonius. 55. The seventh rule of Tichonius and the last, is about the devil and his hodi/. For he is the head of the wicked, who are in a sense his body, and destined to go with him into the punishment of everlasting fire, just as Christ is the head of the Church, which is His body, destined to be with Him in His eternal kingdom and glory. Accordingly, as the first rule, which is called of the Lord and His hody, directs us, when Scripture speaks of one and the same person, to take pains to understand which part of the statement applies to the head and which to the body ; so this last rule shows us that state- ments are sometimes made about the devil, whose truth is not so evident in regard to himself as in regard to his body ; and his body is made up not only of those who are manifestly out of the way, but of those also who, though they really belong to him, are for a time mixed up with the Church,^ until they depart from this life, or until the chaff is separated from the wheat at the last great winnowing. For example, what is said in Isaiah, " How he is fallen from heaven, Lucifer, son of the morning ! " ^ and the other statements of the context which, under the figure of the king of Babylon, are made about the same person, are of course to be understood of the 1 1 John ii. 18. - Comp. Rom. ii. 5. ' Isa. xiv. 12 (LXX.). " How art thou fallen from heaven, Lucifer, son of the morning ! " (A. V.) 118 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK III. devil ; and yet the statement which is made in the same place, " He is ground down on the earth, who sendeth to all nations," ^ does not altogetlier fitly apply to the head himself. For, although the devil sends his angels to all nations, yet it is his body, not himself, that is ground down on the earth, except that he liimself is in his body, which is beaten small like the dust which the wind blows from the face of the earth. 56. Now all these rules^ ex cept the one about the promises and the la w, make one meaning to be unders tood where another is expressed, which is the peculiarity of figurative diction ; and this kind of diction^ it seems to me, is too widely spread to be comprehended in its full exte nt by any one. For, wherever one thing is said with the intention that another shoiild be underst ood we have a figurative expression, even though the name of the trope is not to be found in the art o f rhetoric. And when an expression of this sort occurs where it is customary to find it, there is no trouble in under- standing it ; when it occurs, however, wliere it is not cus- tomary, it costs labour to understand it, from some more, from some less, just as men have got more or less from God of the gifts of intellect, or as they have access to more or fewer external helps. And, as in the case of proper words which I discussed above, and in which tilings are to be understood just as they are expressed, so in the case of figurative words, in which one thing is expressed and another is to be under- stood, and which I have just finished speaking of as much as I tliought enough, students of these venerable documents ought to be counselled not only to make themselves acquainted with tlie forms of expression ordinarily used in Scripture, to observe them carefully, and to remember them accurately, but also, wliat is especially and before all things necessary, to pray that they may understand them. For in these very books on the study of which they are intent, they read, " The Lord giveth wisdom : out of His mouth cometh knowledge and understanding ; " * and it is from Him they have received * Isa. xiv. 12 (LXX.V " How art thou cut ilowu to the grouud, which didst weaken tho natious ! " (A. V.) 9 Trov. ii. 6. CHAP. XXXVII.] CONCLUSION. 119 their very desire for knowledge, if it is wedded to piety. But about signs, so far as relates to words, I have now said enough. It remains to discuss, in the following book, so far as God has given me light, the nieans_of communicatin g our thoughts to others. 120 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IV. BOOK F U E T IL ARGUMENT. * PASSING TO THE SECOND P.\RT OF HIS WORK, THAT WHICH TREATS OF EX- PRESSION, THE_AUTUOR PREMISES THAT IT IS NO PART OF HIS INTENTION TO WRITE A TREATISE ON THE LAWS OF RHETORIC. THESE CAN BE LEARNED ELSEWHERE, AND OUGHT NOT TO BE NEGLECTED, BEING INDEED SPECIALLY NECESSARY FOR THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER, WHOM IT BEHOVES TO EXCEL IN ELOQUENCE AND POWER OF SPEECH. AFTER DETAILING WITH MUCH CARE AND MINUTENESS THE VARIOUS QUALITIES OF AN ORATOP^ HE RECOMMENDS THE AUTHORS OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES AS THE BEST MODELS OF ELOQUENCE, FAR EXCELLING ALL OTHERS IN THE CO.MBINATION OF ELOQUENCE WITH WISDOM. HE POINTS OUT THAT PERSPICUITY IS THE_JVIOST ESSENTIAL QUALITY OF STYLE . AND OUGHT TO BE CULTIVATED WITH ESPECIAL CARE BY THE TEACHER, AS IT IS THE MAIN REQUISITE FOR INSTRUCTION, ALTHOUGH OTHER QUALITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR DELIGHTING AND PERSUADING THE HEARER. ALL THESE GIFTS ARE TO BE SOUGHT IN EARNEST PRAYER FROM GOD, THOUGH WE ARE NOT TO FORGET TO BE ZEALOUS AND DILIGENT IN STUDY. HE SHOWS THAT THERE ARE THREE SPECIES OF STYLE, THE SUB- DUED, T HE ELEGANT, AND THE MAJEST IC ; TILE FIRST SERVING FOR INSTRUC- TION, THE SECOND FOR PRAISE, AND THE THIRD FOR EXHORTATION : AND OF EACH OF THESE HE GIVES EXAMPLES, SELECTED BOTH FROM SCRIPTURE AND FROM EARLY TEACHERS OF THE CHURCH, CYPRIAN AND AMBROSE. HE SHOWS THAT THESE VARIOUS STYLES MAY BE MINGLED, AND WHEN AND FOR WHAT PURPOSES THEY ARE MINGLED ; AND THAT THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME END IN VIEW, TO BRING HOME THE TRUTH TO THE HEARER, SO THAT HE MAY UNDERSTAND IT, HEAR IT WITH GLADNESS, AND PRACTISE IT IN HIS LIFE. FINALLY, HE EXHORTS THE CHRISTIAN TE.VCUER HIMSELF, POINTING OUT THE DIGNITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFICE HE HOLDS, TO LEAD A LIFE IN HARMONY WITH HIS OWN TEACHING, AND TO SHOW A GOOD EXAMPLE TO ALL. Chap. i. — This work not intended as a treatise on lihetoric. 1. ri^lIlS work of mine, Avhich is entitled On, Christian JDoc- JL iriiic, wa.s at the commencenient divided into two parts. For, after a preface, in which I answered by anticipa- tion those who were likely to take exception to the work, I said, " There are two things on which all interpretation of Scripture depends : the mode of ascertaining tlie proper mean- ing, and the mode of making known the meaning when it is CHAP. II.] USE OF RHETORIC LAWFUL. 121 ascertained. I shall treat first of the mode of ascertaining, next of the mode of making known, the meaning."^ As, then, I have already said a great deal about the mode of ascertain- ing the meaning, and have given three books to this one part of the subject, I shall only say a few things about the mode of making known the meaning, in order if possible to bring them ^11 within the compass of one book, and so finish the whole work in four books. 2. In the first place, then, I wish by this preamble to put a stop to the expectations of readers who may think that I am about to lay down rules of rhetoric such as I have learnt, and taught too, in the secular schools, and to warn them that they need not look for any such from me. Not that I think such rules of no use, but that whatever use they have is to be learnt elsewhere ; and if any good man should happen to have leisure for learning them, he is not to ask me to teach them either in this work or any other. Chap. ii. — It is lawful for a Christian teacher to use the art of rhetoric. 3. Now, the art of rhetoric being available for the enforcing either of truth or falsehood, who will dare to say that truth in the person of its defenders is to take its stand unarmed against falsehood ? For example, that those who are trying to persuade men of what is false are to know how to introduce their sub- ject, so as to put the hearer into a friendly, or attentive, or teachable frame of mind, while the defenders of the truth shall be ignorant of that art ? That the former are to tell their falsehoods briefly, clearly, and plausibly, while the latter shall tell the truth in such a way that it is tedious to listen to, hard to understand, and in fine, not easy to believe it ? That the former are to oppose the truth and defend falsehood with sophistical arguments, while the latter shall be unable either to defend what is true, or to refute what is false ? That the former, while imbuing the minds of their hearers with errone- ous opinions, are by their power of speech to awe, to melt, to enliven, and to rouse them, while the latter shall in defence of the truth be sluggish, and frigid, and somnolent ? Who is such a fool as to think this wisdom ? Since, then, the ' Book i. chap. 1. 122 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. faculty of eloquence is available for Loth sides, and is of very great service in the enforcing either of wrong or right, why do not good men study to engage it on the side of truth, when bad men use it to obtain the triumph of wicked and wbrtliless causes, and to further injustice and error ? Chap. hi. — The proper age and the proper means for acquiring rhetorical skill. 4. But the theories and rules on this subject (to which, when you add a tongue thoroughly sldUed by exercise and habit in the use of many words and many ornaments of speech, you have what is called eloquence or oratory) may be learnt apart from these writings of mine, if a suitable space of time be set aside for the purpose at a fit and proper age. But only by those who can learn them quickly ; for the masters of Eoman eloquence themselves did not shrink from saying that any one who cannot learn this art quickly can never thoroughly learn it at all.^ Whether this be true or not, why need we inquire ? For even if this art can occasionally be in the end mastered by men of slower intellect, I do not think it of so much importance as to wish men who have arrived at mature age to spend time in learning it. It is enough that boys should give attention to it ; and even of these, not all who are to be fitted for usefulness in the Church, but only those who are not yet engaged in any occupation of more urgent neces- sity, or which ought evidently to take precedence of it. For men of quick intellect and glowing temperament find it easier to become eloquent by reading and listening to eloquent speakers than by following rules for eloquence. And even outside the canon, which to our great advantage is fixed in a place of secure authority, there is no want of ecclesiastical writings, in reading wliich a man of ability will acquire a tinge of the eloquence with which they are ^vritten, even though he docs not aim at this, but is solely intent on the matters treated of; es^^ecially, of course, if in addition he prac- tise himself in writing, or dictating, and at last also in speaking, the opinions he lias formed on grounds of piety and faith. If, however, such ability be wanting, the rules of rhetoric are either not understood, or if, after great labour has been spent ' Cicero, dc Oralore, iii. 31 ; Quinctil. Iiist. Ora(. i. 1, 2. CHAP. IV.] METHOD OF LEARNING EHETORIC. 123 in enforcing them, they come to be in some small measure understood, they prove of no service. For even those who have learnt them, and who speak with fluency and elegance, cannot always think of them when they are spealdng so as to speak in accordance with them, unless they are discussing the rules themselves. Indeed, I think there are scarcely any who can do both things — that is, speak well, and, in order to do this, think of the rules of speaking while they are speaking. For we must be careful that what we have got to say does not escape us whilst we are thinking about saying it according to the rules of art. Nevertheless, in the speeches of eloquent men, we find rules of eloquence carried out which the speakers did not think of as aids to eloquence at the time when they were speaking, whether they had ever learnt them, or whether they had never even met with them. For it is because they are eloquent that they exemplify these rules ; it is not that they use them in order to be eloquent. 5. And, therefore, as infants cannot learn to speak except by learning words and phrases from those who do speak, why should not men become eloquent without being taught any art of speech, simply by reading and learning the speeches of elo- quent men, and by imitating them as far as they can ? And what do we find from the examples themselves to be the case in this respect ? We know numbers who, without acquaint- ance with rhetorical rules, are more eloquent than many who have learnt these ; but we know no one who is eloquent without having read and listened to the speeches and debates of eloquent men. For even the art of grammar, which teaches correctness of speech, need not be learnt by boys, if they have the advantage of growing up and living among men w^ho speak correctly. For without knowing the names of any of the faults, they will, from being accustomed to correct speech, lay hold upon whatever is faulty in the speech of any one they listen to, and avoid it ; just as city-bred men, even when illiterate, seize upon the faults of rustics. Chap. iv.—The duty of the CJiristian teacher. 6. It is the duty, then, of the interpreter and teacher of Holy Scripture, the defender of the true faith and the oppo- 124 ON cnrjSTiAX doctrine. [book iv. nent of error, bot h to teach what is ri^ ht and to refute what is wrong, and in the performance of this task to conciliate the hostile, to rouse the careless, and to tell the ignorant both what is occurring at present and what is probable in the future. But once that his hearers are friendly, attentive, and ready to learn, whether he has found them so, or has himself made them so, the remaining objects are to be carried out in whatever way the case requires. If the hearers need teaching, the matter treated of must be made fully known by means of narrative. On the other hand, to clear up points that are doubtful requires reasoning and the exhibition of proofs. If, however, the hearers require to be roused rather than instructed, in order that they may be diligent to do what they already know, and to bring their feelings into harmony with the truths they admit, greater vigour of speech is needed. Here entreaties and reproaches, exhortations and iipbraidings, and all the other means of rousing the emotions, are necessary. 7. And all the methods I have mentioned are constantly used by nearly every one in cases where speech is the agency employed. Chap. v. — Wisdom of more importance than eloquence to the Christian teacher. But as some men employ these coarsely, inelegantly, and frigidly, while others use them with acuteness, elegance, and spirit, the work that I am speaking of ought to be undertaken by one who can argue and speak with wisdom, if not with eloquence, and with profit to his hearers, even though he profit them less than he would if he could speak with eloquence Itoo. But we must bew are of the man who abounds in elo- quent nonsense, and so much the more if the hearer is pleased with what is not worth listening to, and thinks that because the speaker is eloquent what he says must be true. And this opinion is held even by those who think that the art of rhetoric should be taught : for they confess that " though wisdom without eloquence is of little service to states, yet eloquence without wisdom is frequently a positive injury, and is of service never." ^ If, then, the men who teach the prin- ciples of eloquence have been forced by truth to confess this ill the very books which treat of eloquence, though they were ' Cicero, de Invcntione Rhetorica, i. 1. CHAP, v.] WISDOM BETTER TITAN ELOQUENCE. 125 ignorant of the true, that is, the heavenly wisdom which comes down from the Father of Lights, how much more ought we to feel it who are the sons and the ministers of this higher wisdom ! Now a man speaks with more or less wisdom just as he has made more or less progress in the knowledge of Scripture ; I do not mean by reading them much and com- mitting them to memory, but by understanding them aright and carefully searching into their meaning. For there are who read and yet neglect them ; they read to remember the words, but are careless about knowing the meaning. It is plain we must set far above these the men who are not so retentive of the words, but see with the eyes of the heart into the heart of Scripture. Better than either of these, however, is the man who, when he wishes, can repeat the words, and at the same time correctly apprehends their meaning. i' 8. Now it is especially necessary for the man who is bound ^ to speak wisely, even though he cannot speak eloquently, to retain in memory the words of Scripture. For the more he discerns the poverty of his own speech, the more he ought to draw on the riches of Scripture, so that what he says in his own words he may prove by the words of Scripture ; and he himself, though small and weak in his own words, may gain strength and power from the confirming testimony of great men. For his proof gives pleasure when he cannot please by his mode of speech. But if a man desire to speak not only with wisdom, but with eloquence also (and assuredly he will prove of greater service if he can do both), I would rather send him to read, and listen to, and exercise himself in imitating, eloquent men, than advise him to spend time with the teachers of rhetoric ; especially if the men he reads and listens to are justly praised as having spoken, or as being accustomed to speak, not only with eloquence, but with wisdom also. For eloquent speakers are heard with pleasure ; wise speakers with profit. And, therefore, Scripture does not say that the multi- tude of the eloquent, but " the multitude of the wise is the welfare of the world." ^ And as we must often swallow whole-v some bitters, so we must always avoid unwholesome sweets! But what is better than wholesome sweetness or sweet wliole- ^ WisJ. vi. 24. 12G ox CIIRISTIAX DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. someness ? For the sweeter we try to make such things, the easier it is to make their wholesomeness serviceable. And so there are writers of the Church who have expounded the Holy Scriptures, not only with wisdom, but with elo(|uence as well ; and there is not more time for the reading of these than is suf- ficient for those who are studious and at leisure to exhaust them. Chap. vi. — The sacred writers unite eloquence with wisdom. 9. Here, perhaps, some one inquires whether the authors whose divinely-inspired writings constitute the canon, which carries with it a most wholesome authority, are to be consi- dered wise only, or eloquent as well. A question which to me, and to those who think with me, is very easily settled. For where I understand these writers, it seems to me not only that notliing can be wiser, but also that nothing can be more eloquent. And I venture to affirm that all who truly under- stand what these writers say, p)erceive at the same time that it could not have been properly said in any other way. For as there is a kind of eloquence that is more becoming in youth, and a kind that is more becoming in old age, and nothing can be called eloquence if it be not suitable to the person of the speaker, so there is a kind of eloquence that is becoming in men who justly claim the highest authority, and who are evidently inspired of God. With this eloquence they spoke ; no otlier would have been suitable for them ; and this itself would be unsuitable in any other, for it is in keep- incr with their character, wliile it mounts as far alcove that of others (not from empty inflation, but from solid merit) as it seems to fall below them. Where, however, I do not under- stand these writers, tliough their eloquence is then less apparent, I have no doubt but that it is of the same kind as that I do understand. Tlie very obscurity, too, of these divine and wholesome words was a necessary element in eloquence of a kind that was designed to profit our under- standings, not only by the discovery of truth, but also by the exercise of their powers. 10. I could, however, if T had time, show those men wlio cry up their own form of language as superior to that of our authors (not because of its majesty, but because of its infla- CHAP. VII.] EXAMPLES OF SCPJPTUPAL ELOQUENCE. 127 tion), that all those powers and beauties of eloquence which they make their boast, are to be found in the sacred wiitings which God in His goodness has provided to mould our charac- ters, and to guide us from this world of wickedness to the blessed world above. But it is not the qualities which these writers have in common with the heathen orators and poets that give me such unspeakable delight in their eloquence ; I am more struck with admiration at the way in which, by an elo- quence peculiarly their own, they so use this eloquence of ours that it is not conspicuous either by its presence or its absence : for it did not become them either to condemn it or to make an ostentatious display of it ; and if they had shunned it, they would have done the former ; if they had made it prominent, they might have appeared to be doing the latter. And in those passages where the learned do note its presence, the matters spoken of are such, that the words in which they are put seem not so much to be sought out by the speaker as spontane- ously to suggest themselves; as if wisdom were walking out of its house, — that is, the breast of the wise man, and eloquence, like an inseparable attendant, followed it without being called for.^ Chap. vii. — Examples of true eloquence drawn from the Epistles of Paul and the Prophecies of Amos. 11. For who would not see what the apostle meant to say, and how wisely he has said it, in the following passage : " We glory in tribulations also : knowing that tribulation worketh patience ; and patience, experience ; and experience, hope : and hope maketh not ashamed ; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us" ?^ Now were any man unlearnedly learned (if I may use the expression) to contend that the apostle had here fol- lowed the rules of rhetoric, would not every Christian, learned or unlearned, laugh at him ? And yet here we find the figure which is called in Greek /cXZ/xa^ (climax), and by some in Latin gradatio, for they do not care to call it scala (a ladder), when the words and ideas have a connection of dependency the one upon the other, as we see here that patience arises out of ^ Cf. Cicero, Orator. 21 : "Sed est eloquentia?, sicut reliqnarum reruni, fun- damcntuni sapieiitia. " ' Kom. V. 3-5. 123 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. tribulation, experience out of patience, and hope out of expe- rience. Another ornament, too, is found here ; for after certain statements finished in a single tone of voice, which we call clauses and sections {membra ct cccsa), but the Greeks KOjXa and Koiifiara} there follows a rounded sentence (amhitus sive circuitus) which the Greeks call irepioho^;^ the clauses of which are suspended on the voice of the speaker till the whole is completed by the last clause. For of the statements which precede the period, this is the first clause, " knowing that tribulation worketh patience;" the second, "and patience, ex- perience ;" the third, " and experience, hope." Then the period which is subjoined is completed in three clauses, of which the first is, " and hope maketh not ashamed ;" the second, " because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts ;" the third, "by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us." But these and other matters of the same kind are tauglit in the art of elocution. As then I do not affirm that the apostle was guided by the rules of eloquence, so I do not deny that his wisdom naturally produced, and was accompanied by, eloquence. 12. In the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, again, he refutes certain false apostles who had gone out from the Jews, and had been trying to injure his character ; and being compelled to speak of himself, though he ascribes this as folly to himself, how wisely and how eloquently he speaks ! But wisdom is his guide, eloquence his attendant ; he follows the first, the second follows him, and yet he does not spurn it when it comes after him. " I say again," he says, " Let no man think me a fool : if otherwise, yet as a fool re- ceive me, that I may boast myself a little. That which I speak, T speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting. Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will glory also. For ye suffer fools gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise. For ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage, if a man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself, if a iiuiu smile you on the face. I speak as * Cf. Cicero, Orator. C2 : "Qua' noscio cur, cnm Grrcci xiuftx-ra, ct *Z>,x nominent, nos non recto iiuisa et membra dicamus." »Cf. Cicero, de Claris Oratoribus, 44 : •' Comprehensio et ambitus ille ver- bomin (si sic perioJum appellari placet);" CHAP. VII.] EXAMPLE FEOM THE APOSTLE PAUL. 129 concerning reproach, as though we had been weak. Howbeit, whereinsoever any is bold (I speak foolishly), I am bold also. Are they Hebrews ? so am I. Are they Israelites ? so am I. Are they the seed of Abraham ? so am I. Are they ministers of Christ ? (I speak as a fool), I am more : in labours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequent, in deaths oft. Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one, thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep; in journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilder- ness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren ; in weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness. Besides those things which are without, that which cometh upon me daily, the care of all the churches. Who is weak, and I am not weak ? who is offended, and I burn not ? If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern my infirmities."^ The thoughtful and attentive perceive how much wisdom there is in these words. And even a man soimd asleep must notice what a stream of eloquence flows through them. 13. Further still, the educated man observes that those sections wliich the Greeks call Kofjufiaja, and the clauses and periods of which I spoke a short time ago, being intermingled in the most beautiful variety, make up the' whole form and features (so to speak) of that diction by which even the un- learned are delighted and affected. For, from the place where I commenced to quote, the passage consists of periods : the first the smallest possible, consisting of two members ; for a period cannot have less than two members, though it may have more : " I say again, let no man think me a fool." The next has three members : " if otherwise, yet as a fool receive me, that I may boast myself a little." The third has four members : " That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting." The fourth has two : " Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will glory also." And the fifth has two : " For ye suffer fools ^ 2 Cor. xi. 16-30. Cim. DOCT. I 130 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTmNE. [BOOK IV. gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise." The sixth again has two members : " for ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage." Then follow three sections {cccsa) : " if a man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself" Next three clauses (mcmhra) : " if a man smite you on the face. I speak as concerning reproach, as though we had been weak." Then is subjoined a period of three members : " Howbeit, whereinso- ever any is bold (I speak foolishly), I am bold also." After this, certain separate sections being put in the interrogatory form, separate sections are also given as answers, three to three : " Are they Hebrews ? so am I. Are they Israelites ? so am I. Are they the seed of Abraham ? so am I." But a fourth section being put likewise in the interrogatory form, the answer is given not in another section {cccsum) but in a clause {incmhrum) : ^ " Are they the ministers of Christ ? (I speak as a fool.) I am more." Then the next four sections are given continuously, the interrogatory form being most elegantly sup- pressed : " in labours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequent, in deaths oft." Next is interposed a short period ; for, by a suspension of the voice, " of the Jews five times " is to be marked off as constituting one member, to which is joined the second, " received I forty stripes save one." Then he returns to sections, and three are set down : " Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, tlmce I suffered shipwreck." Next comes a clause : " a night and a day I have been in the deep." Next fourteen sections burst forth with a vehemence which is most appropriate : " In jour- neyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren, in weariness and painfulness, in watchiufTs often, in hummer and thirst, in fastincjs often, in cold and nakedness." After tliis comes in a period of three members : " Besides those things which are without, that which cometh ii])on me daily, the care of all the churches." And to this lie adds two clauses in a tone of inquiry : " Who ' The only apparent diirercnce between meriilrum and c Jer. xxiii. 29. * Ts. xixv. IS. CHAP. XV.] NECESSITY FOR PEAYER. l43 of eloquence, such as we find in his subsequent letters, a style which is admired without effort, is sought after with eagerness, but is not attained without great difficulty. He says, then, in one place, " Let us seek this abode : the neighbouring soli- tudes afford a retreat where, whilst the spreading shoots of the vine trees, pendulous and intertwined, creep amongst the supporting reeds, the leafy covering has made a portico of vine."^ There is wonderful fluency and exuberance of language here ; but it is too florid to be pleasing to serious minds. But people who a;:e fond of this style are apt to think that men who do not use it, but employ a more chastened style, do so because they cannot attain the former, not because their judg- ment teaches them to avoid it. Wherefore this holy man shows both that he can speak in that style, for he has done so once, and that he does not choose, for he never uses it again. Chap. xv. — The Christian teacher should x^ray before preaching. 32. And so our Christian orator, while he says what is just, and holy, and. good (and he ought never to say anything else), does all he can to be heard with intelligence, with pleasure, and with obedience ; and he need not doubt that if he succeed in this object, and so far as he succeeds, he will succeed more - by piety in prayer than by gifts of oratory ; and so he ought to pray for himself, and for those he is about to address, before he attempts to speak. And when the hour is come that he must speak, he ought, before he opens his mouth, to lift up his thirsty soul to God, to drink in what he is about to pour forth, and to be himself filled with what he is about to dis- tribute. For, as in regard to every matter of faith and love there are many things that may be said, and many ways of saying them, who knows what it is expedient at a given moment , for us to say, or to be heard saying, except God who knows / the hearts of all ? And who can make us say what we ought, and in the way we ought, except Him in whose hand both we and our speeches are ? Accordingly, he who is anxious both to know and to teach should learn all that is to be taught, and acquire such a faculty of speech as is suitable for a divine. But when the hour for speech arrives, let him reflect upon that 1 Cyprian, ad Donat. Ep. i 144 ON CnRISTIAX DOCirJNE. [book IV. saying of our Lord's, as better suited to the wants of a pious mind : " Take no thought how or what ye shall speak ; for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak/but the Spirit of your Father which spcaketh in you."^ The Holy Spirit, then, speaks thus in those who for Christ's sake are delivered to the persecutors ; why not also in those who deliver Christ's message to those who are willing to learn ? Chap. x\i.— Human directions not to be despised, thoujJi God makes the true teacher. 33. Now if any one says that we need not direct men how or what they should teach, since the Holy Spirit makes them teachers, he may as well say that we need not pray, since our Lord says, " Your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask Him ;" ^ or that the Apostle Paul should not have given directions to Timothy and Titus as to how or what they should teach others. And these three apostolic epistles ought to be constantly before the eyes of every one who has obtained the position of a teacher in the Church. In the First Epistle to Timothy do we not read : " These things command and teach " ? ^ What these things are, has been told pre- viously. Do we not read there : " Eebuke not an elder, but entreat him as a father " ? * Is it not said in the Second Epistle : " Hold fast the form of sound w^ords, wliich thou hast heard of me " ? ^ And is he not there told : " Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth " ? ^ And in the same place : " Preach the word ; be instant in season, out of season ; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with all loug-suftering and doctrine."^ And so in the Epistle to Titus, does he not say that a bishop ought to " hold fast the failliful word as he hath been taught, that lie may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers " ? ® There, too, he says : " But speak tliou the tilings which become sound doc- trine : that the aged men be sober," and so on. ^ And there, too : " These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with aU » Matt. X. 19, 20. > iMatt. vi. 8. ' 1 Tim. iv. 11. * 1 Tim. V. 1. ^ 2 Tim. i. 13. « 2 Tim. ii. 15. 7 2 Tim. iv. 2. • Tit. i. 9. » Tit. ii. 1, 2. CHAP. XVIL] the THEEE STYLES OF SPEECH. 145 authority. Let no man despise thee. Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers," ^ and so on. Wliat then are we to think ? Does the apostle in any way contra- dict himself, when, though he says that men are made teachers by the operation of the Holy Spirit, he yet himself gives them directions how and what they should teach ? Or are we to understand, that though the duty of men to teach even the teachers does not cease when the Holy Spirit is given, yet that neither is he who planteth anything, nor he who watereth, but God who giveth the increase ? ^ Wherefore though holy men be our helpers, or even holy angels assist us, no one learns aright the things that pertain to life with God, until God makes him ready to learn from Himself, that God who is thus addressed in the psalm : '' Teach me to do Thy will ; for Thou art my God."^ And so the same apostle says to Timothy him- self, speaking, of course, as teacher to disciple : " But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned, and hast been assured of, knowincj of whom thou hast learned them."* For as the medicines which men apply to the bodies of their fellow- men are of no avail except God gives them virtue (who can heal without their aid, though they cannot without His), and yet they are applied ; and if it be done from a sense of duty, it is esteemed a work of mercy or benevolence ; so the aids of teaching, applied through the instrumentality of man, are of advantage to the soul only when God w^orks to make them of advantage, who could give the gospel to man even without the help or agency of men. Chap, xyii, — Threefold division of the various styles of speech. 34. He then who, in speaking, aims at enforcing what is good, should not despise any of those three objects, either to teach, or to give pleasure, or to move, and should pray and strive, as we have said above, to be heard with intelligence, with pleasure, and with ready compliance. And when he does this with elegance and propriety, he may justly be called eloquent, even though he do not carry with him the assent of his hearer. For it is these three ends, viz. teaching, giving pleasure, and moving, that the great master of Eoman eloquence 1 Tit. ii. 15, iii. 1. ^ i Cor. iii. 7. 3 pg, cxliii. 10. -» o Tim. iii. H. CHll. DOCT. K 14G ON cnniSTiAX doctrine. [book iv. liimself seems to liave intended that the following three direc- tions should subserve : " He, then, shall be eloquent, who can say little things in a subdued style, moderate things in a tem- perate style, and great things in a majestic style : " ^ as if he had taken in also the three ends mentioned above, and had embraced the whole in one sentence thus : " He, then, shall be eloquent, who can say little things in a subdued style, in order to give instruction, moderate things in a temperate style, in order to give pleasure, and great things in a majestic style, in order to sway the mind." Chap, xviii. — The Christian orator is constantly dnalinrj tcith great matters. 35. Now the author I have quoted could have exemplified these three directions, as laid down by himself, in regard to legal questions : he could not, however, have done so in regard to ecclesiastical questions, — the only ones that an address such as I wish to give shape to is concerned with. For of legal questions those are called small which have reference to pecu- niary transactions ; those great where a matter relating to man's life or liberty comes up. Cases, again, which have to do with neither of these, and where the intention is not to get the hearer to do, or to pronounce judgment upon any- thing, but only to give him pleasure, occupy as it were a middle place between the former two, and are on that account called middling, or moderate. For moderate things get their name from modus (a measure) ; and it is an abuse, not a proper use of the word moderate, to put it for little. In questions like ours, however, where all things, and especially those addressed to the people from the place of authority, ought to have refer- ence to men's salvation, and that not their temporal but their eternal salvation, and where also the thing to be guarded against is eternal ruin, everything that we say is important ; so much so, that even what the preacher says about pecuniary matters, whetlier it have reference to loss or gain, wliether the amount b.e great or small, should not seem unimportant. For justice is never unimportant, and justice ought assuredly to be observed, even in small allairs of money, as our Lord says : * Cicero, Orator. 29 : "Is i^ihir crit eloquens, qui poterit parva summisse, modica tcmiKTate, magna granJitcr dicere. " CHAP. XYIIL] IMPOrvTANCE OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. 14V "' He that is faithful in that which is least, is faithful also in much." ^ That which is least, then, is very little ; but to be faithful in that which is least is great. For as the nature of the circle, viz. that all lines drawn from the centre to the circimiference are equal, is the same in a great disk that it is in the smallest coin ; so the greatness of justice is in no degree lessened, though the matters to which justice is applied be small. 36. And when the apostle spoke about trials in regard to secular affairs (and what were these but matters of money ?), he says : " Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints ? Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world ? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters ? Know ye not that we shall judge angels ? how much more things that pertain to this life ? If, then, ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the Church. I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you ? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren ? But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers. Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another : why do ye not rather take wrong ? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded ? Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?" ^ Why is it that the apostle is so indignant, and that he thus accuses, and upbraids, and chides, and threatens ? Why is it that the changes in his tone, so frequent and so abrupt, testify to the depth of his emotion ? Why is it, in fine, that he speaks in a tone so exalted about mat- ters so very trifling ? Did secular matters deserve so much at his hands ? God forbid. No ; but all this is done for the sake of justice, charity, and piety, which in the judgment of every sober mind are great, even when applied to matters the very least. 37. Of course, if we were giving men advice as to how they ought to conduct secular cases, either for themselves or for their connections, before the church courts, we would rightly advise them to conduct them quietly as matters of little » Luke xvi. 10. 21 Cor. vi. 1-9. 148 ON cnniSTLVN doctrine. [book iv. moment. liut we are treating of the manner of speech of the man who is to be a teacher of the truths wliich deliver ns from eternal misery and bring ns to eternal happiness ; and wherever these truths are spoken of, whether in public or pri- vate, whether to one or many, whether to friends or enemies, whether in a continuous discourse or in convei-sation, whether in tracts, or in books, or in letters long or short, they are of great importance. Unless indeed we are prepared to say that, because a cup of cold water is a very trifling and common thing, the saying of our Lord that he who gives a cup of cold water to one of His disciples shall in no wise lose his reward,^ is very trivial and unimportant. Or that when a preacher takes this saying as his text, he should think his subject very unim- portant, and therefore speak without either eloquence or power, but in a subdued and humble style. Is it not the case that when we happen to speak on this subject to the people, and the presence of God is with us, so that what we say is not altogether unworthy of the subject, a tongue of fire springs up out of that cold water which inflames even the cold hearts of men with a zeal for doing works of mercy in hope of an eternal reward ? Chap. xix. — The Christian teaclier must use (liferent styles on (liferent occasions. 38. And yet, while our teacher ought to speak of great 1 matters, he ought not always to be speaking of them in a o . \ majestic tone, but in a subdued tone when he is teaching, temperately when he is giving praise or blame. "S^Hicn, how- ever, something is to be done, and we are speaking to those who ought, but are not willing, to do it, then great matters must be spoken of with power, and in a manner calculated ho sway the mind. And sometimes the same important matter ^is treated in all these ways at different times, quietly when it is being taught, temperately when its importance is being urged, and powerfully when we are forcing a mind that is averse to the truth to turn and embrace it. For is there anything greater than God Himself? Is nothing, then, to be learnt about Him ? Or ought he who is teaching the Trinity in unity to speak of it otherwise than in the method of calm discussion, • Matt. X. 42. CHAP. XX.] EXAMPLES FROM SCPJPTURE. 149 SO that in regard to a subject wliicli it is not easy to compre- liend, we may understand as much as it is given us to under- stand ? Are we in this case to seek out ornaments instead of proofs ? Or is the hearer to be moved to do something instead of being instructed so that he may learn something ? But when we come to praise God, either in Himself, or in His works, what a field for beauty and splendour of language opens up before man, who can task his powers to the utmost in praising Him whom no one can adequately praise, though there is no one who does not praise Him in some measure ! But if He be not worshipped, or if idols, whether they be demons or any created being whatever, be worshipped with Him or in preference to Him, then we ought to speak out with power and impressiveness, show how great a wickedness this is, and urge men to flee from it. Chap. xx. — Examples of the various styles draionfrom Scripture. 39. But now to come to something more definite. We have an example of the calm, subdued style in the Apostle Paul, where he says : " Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law ? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons ; the one by a bond maid, the other by a free woman. But he who was of the bond woman was born after the flesh ; but he of the free woman was by .promise. Which things are an allegory : for these are the two covenants ; the one from the Mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Hagar. For this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all;"-^ and so on. And in the same way where he reasons thus : " Brethren, I speak after the manner of men : Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not. And to seeds, as of many ; but as of one. And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise 1 Gal. iv, 21-26. 150 ox CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IT. of none efTect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise : but God gave it to Abraham by promise." ^ And because it mij^^lit possibly occur to the hearer to ask, If there is no inheritance by the law, why then was the law given ? he himself anticipates this objection and asks, " Where- fore then serveth the law ?" And the answer is given : " It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made ; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator is not a mediator of one ; but God is one." And here an objection occurs which he himself has stated : " Is the law then against the promises of God ?" He answers : " God forbid." And he also states the reason in these words : " For if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the Scripture hath con- cluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe." ^ It is part, then, of the duty of the teacher not only to interpret what is obscure, and to unravel the difficulties of questions, but also, while doing this, to meet other" questions which may chance to suggest themselves, lest these should cast doubt or discredit on what we say. If, however, the solution of these questions suggest itseK as soon as the questions themselves arise, it is useless to disturb what we cannot remove. And besides, when out of one question other questions arise, and out of these again still others ; if these be aU discussed and solved, the reason- ing is extended to such a length, that unless the memory be exceedingly powerfid and active, the reasoner finds it im- possible to return to the original question from which he set out. It is, however, exceedingly desirable that whatever occurs to the mind as an objection that might be urged should be stated and refuted, lest it turn up at a time when no one will be present to answer it, or lest, if it should occur to a man who is present but says nothing about it, it might never be thoroughly removed. 40. In the following words of tlie apostle we have the tem- perate style : " Kebuke not an elder, but entreat him as a father ; and the younger men as brethren ; the elder women 1 Gal. iii. 15-13. » Gal. iii. 10-22. CHAP. XX.] EXAMPLES OF THE TEMPERATE STYLE. 151 as motliers, the younger as sisters."^ And also in these : '' I beseech you, therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service."^ And almost the whole of this hortatory passage is in the temperate style of eloquence ; and those parts of it are the most beautiful in which, as if paying what was due, things that belong to each other are gracefully brought together. For example ; " Having then gifts, differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith ; or ministry, let us wait on our ministering ; or he that teacheth, on teaching ; or he that exhort eth, on exhortation : he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity ; he that ruleth, with diligence ; he that showeth mercy, with cheerfulness. Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil, cleave to that which is good. Be Idndly affectioned one to another with brotherly love ; in honour preferring one another ; not slothful in business ; fervent in spirit ; serving the Lord ; rejoicing in hope ; patient in tribulation ; continuing instant in prayer ; distributing to the necessity of saints ; given to hospitality. Bless them which persecute you : bless, and curse not. Eejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep. Be of the same mind one toward another." ^ And how gracefully all this is brought to a close in a period of two members : " Mind not hidi thingjs, but condescend to men of low estate!" And a little afterwards : "Eender therefore to all their dues : tribute to whom tribute is due ; custom to whom custom ; fear to whom fear ; honour to whom honour."* And these also, though expressed in single clauses, are terminated by a period of two members : " Owe no man anything, but to love one another." And a little farther on : " The night is far spent, the day is at hand : let us therefore cast off the works of dark- ness, and let us put on the armour of light. Let us walk honestly, as in the day ; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying : but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof." ^ Now if the passage » 1 Tim. V. 1,2. - Rom. xii. 1. 3 p^om, xii. 6-16. ♦Ptom. xiii. 7. ^llom. xiii. 12-11. 152 ON CnRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IV. were translated thus, " et carnis providentiam ne in concupis- centiis feceritis,"^ the ear would no doubt be gratified with a more harmonious ending ; but our translator, with more strict- ness, preferred to retain even the order of the words. And how this sounds in the Greek language, in which the apostle spoke, those wlio are better skilled in that tongue may deter- mine. My opinion, however, is, that what has been translated to us in the same order of words does not run very harmoni- ously even in the original tongue. 41. And, indeed, I must confess that our authors are veiy defective in that grace of speech which consists in harmonious endings. Whether this be the fault of the translators, or whether, as I am more inclined to believe, the authors designedly avoided such ornaments, I dare not affirm ; for I confess I do not know. This I know, however, that if any one who is skilled in this species of harmony would take the closing sentences of these writers and arrange them according to tlie law of harmony (which he could very easily do by changing some words for words of equivalent meaning, or by retaining the words he finds and altering their arrangement), he will learn that these divinely-inspired men are not defective in any of those points which he has been taught in the schools of the grammarians and rhetoricians to consider of importance; and he will find in them many kinds of speech of great beauty, — beautiful even in our language, but especially beauti- ful in the original, — none of which can be found in those writings of which tliey boast so much. But care must be taken that, wliile adding harmony, we take away none of the weiglit from these divine and authoritative utterances. Xow our propliets were so far from being deficient in the musical training from which this harmony we speak of is most fully learnt, that Jerome, a very learned man, describes even the metres employed by some of them,''^ in the Hebrew language at least ; though, in order to give an accurate render- ing of the words, he has not preserved these in his translation. I, however (to speak of my own feeling, which is better known ' Instead of ** ne feceritls in concujii^ccntiis," which is the translation as quoted 1)}' Au^Lstine. ^ 111 his prcfiicc to Job. CHAP. XX.] THE MA.JESTIC STYLE. 153 to me than it is to others, and than that of others is to me), while I do not in my own speech, however modestly I think it done, neglect these harmonious endings, am just as well pleased to find them in the sacred authors very rarely. 42. The majestic style of speech differs from the temperate style just spoken of, chiefly in that it is not so much decked out with verbal ornaments as exalted into vehemence b;; mental emotion. It uses, indeed, nearly all the ornaments that the other does ; but if they do not happen to be at hand, it does not seek for them. For it is borne on by its owi vehemence ; and the force of the thought, not the desire for' ornament, makes it seize upon any beauty of expression that comes in its way. It is enough for its object that warmth of feeling should suggest the fitting words ; they need not be selected by careful elaboration of speech. If a brave man be armed with weapons adorned with gold and jewels, he works feats of valour with those arms in the heat of battle, not because they are costly, but because they are arms ; and yet the same man does great execution, even when anger furnishes him with a weapon that he digs out of the ground.^ The apostle in the following passage is urging that, for the sake of the ministry of the gospel, and sustained by the consolations of God's grace, we should bear with patience all the evils of this life. It is a great subject, and is treated with power, and the ornaments of speech are not wanting : " Behold," he says, " now is the accepted time ; behold, now is the day of salva- tion. Giving no offence in anything, that the ministry be not blamed : but in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of God, in much patience, in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, in strifes, in imprisonments, in tumults, in labours, in watchings, in fastings ; by pureness, by knowledge, by long- suffering, by kindness, by the Holy Ghost, by love unfeigned, by the word of truth, by the power of God, by the armour of righteousness on the right hand and on the left, by honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report : as deceivers, and yet true ; as unknown, and yet well known ; as dying, and, behold, we live ; as chastened, and not killed ; as sorrow- ^ An allusion to Virgil's JSneid, vii. 508 : *' Quod cuique repertum Rimanti, telum ira fecit. " 154 ON cnniSTiAN doctkixe. [book it. fill, yet alway rejoicin;; ; as poor, yet making many rich ; as having notliing, and yet possessing all things." ^ See him still burning : " ye Corinthians, our mouth is opened unto you, our lieart is enlarged," and so on ; it would be tedious to go through it all. 43. And in the same way, writing to the Eomans, he urges that the persecutions of this world should be overcome by charity, in assured reliance on the help of God. And he treats this subject with both power and beauty : " We know^," he says, " that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to His purpose. For w^hom He did foreknow. He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the first-born among many brethren. Moreover, whom He did predestinate, them He also called ; and whom He called, them He also justified ; and whom He justified, them He also glori- fied. What shall w^e then say to these things ? If God be for us, who can be against us ? He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not witli Him also freely give us all things ? Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect ? It is God that justifieth ; who is he that condemneth ? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecu- tion, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword ? (As it is wTitten, For Thy sake we are killed all the day long ; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.) Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors, through Him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor deptli, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, wliich is in Christ Jesus our Lord." ' 44. Again, in writing to the Galatians, although the whole epistle is written in the subdued style, except at the end, where it rises into a temperate eloquence, yet he interposes one passage of so much feeling that, notwithstanding the absence '2 Cor. vi. 2 10. » Koin. viii. 2S-39. CHAP. XXI.] EX.UrPLES FEOM AMCPOSE AND CYPrJAX. 13 O of any ornaments such as appear in the passages just quoted, it cannot be called anything but powerful : " Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain. Brethren, I beseech you, be as I am ; for I am as ye are : ye have not injured me at all. Ye know how, through infirmity of the flesh, I preached the gospel unto you at the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected ; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus. Where is then the blessedness ye spake of ? for I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out" your own eyes, and have given them to me. Am I there- fore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth ? They zealously affect you, but not well ; yea, they would exclude you, that ye might affect them. But it is good to be zealously affected always in a good thing, and not only when I am present with you. My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you^ I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice ; for I stand in doubt of you."^ Is there anything here of contrasted words arranged antithetically, or of words rising gradually to a climax, or of sonorous clauses, and sections, and periods ? Yet, notwithstanding, there is a glow of strong emotion that makes us feel the fervour of eloquence. CiiAP. XXI. — Examples of the various styles, drawn from the teachers of the Church, esjjecially Ambrose and Cyprian. 45. But these writings of the apostles, though clear, are yet profound, and are so written that one who is not content with a superficial acquaintance, but desii^es to know them thoroughly, must not only read and hear them, but must have an expositor. Let us, then, study these various modes of speech as they are exemplified in the writings of men who, by reading tlie Scrip- tures, have attained to the knowledge of divine and saving truth, and have ministered it to the Church. Cyprian of blessed memory Avrites in the subdued style in his treatise on the sacrament of the cup. In this book he resolves the ques- tion, whether tlie cup of the Lord ought to contain water only, or water mingled with wine. But we must quote a passage 1 Gal. iv. 10-20. 15G ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. by way of illustration. After the customary introduction, he proceeds to the discussion of the point in question. " Observe," he says, "that wc are instructed, in presenting the cup, to maintain the custom handed down to us from the Lord, and to do nothing that our Lord has not first done for us : so that the cup which is offered in remembrance of Him should be mixed with wine. For, as Christ says, ' I am the true vine ,' ^ it follows that the blood of Christ is wine, not water ; and the cup cannot appear to contain His blood by which we are re- deemed and quickened, if the wine be absent ; for by the wine is the blood of Christ typified, that blood which is foreshadowed and proclaimed in all the types and declarations of Scripture. For we find that in the book of Genesis this very circumstance in regard to the sacrament is foreshadowed, and our Lord's sufferings typically set forth, in the case of Xoah, when he drank wine, and was drunken, and was uncovered within his tent, and his nakedness was exposed by his second son, and was carefully hidden by his elder and his younger sons." It is not necessary to mention the other circumstances in detail, as it is only necessary to observe this point, that Noah, foreshadowing the future reality, drank, not water, but wine, and thus showed forth our Lord's passion. In the same way we see the sacra- ment o f the Lord ' s supper pre figured in the case of Melchize- dek the priest, according to the testimony of the Holy Scrip- tures, where it says : * And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine : and he was the priest of the most high God. And he blessed Abraham.'^ Ko w, that !Melchiz edek was a type of Chr ist, the Holy S])irit declares in the_rsabns, where the Father addressing the Son says, * Thou art a priest for ever after the order of ^lelchizedek.'^ " ^ In this passage, and in all of the letter that follows, the subdued style is main- tained, as the reader may easily satisfy himself. 4G. St. Aml)rose also, though dealing with a question of very great importance, the equality of the Holy Spirit with the Father and the Son, employs the subdued style, because the oljject he has in view demands, not beauty of diction, nor the swaying of the mind by the stir of emotion, but facts and ^ John XV. 1. » G.-n. ix. 20-24. ' Gen. xiv. IS, 19. * Tb. ex. i. ^ Ad Ccecilium, E;). G3. 1, 2. CHAP. XXL] CYPPJAN ON VIPGINITY. 157 proofs. Accordingly, in the introduction to liis work, we find the following passage among others : " When Gideon was startled by the message he had heard from God, that, though thousands of the people failed, yet through one man God would deliver His people from their enemies, he brought forth a kid of the goats, and by direction of the angel laid it with un- leavened cakes upon a rock, and poured the broth over it ; and as soon as the angel of God touched it with the end of the staff that was in his hand, there rose up fire out of the rock and consumed the offering.-^ Now this sign seems to indicate that the rock was a type of the body of Christ, for it is written, ' They drank of that spiritual rock that followed them, and that rock was Christ;'^ this, of course, referring not to Christ's divine nature, but to His flesh, whose ever- flowinor fountain of blood has ever satisfied the hearts of His thirsting people. And so it was at that time declared in a mystery that the Lord Jesus, when crucified, should abolish in His flesh the sins of the whole world, and not their guilty acts merely, but the evil lusts of their hearts. For the kid's flesh refers to the guilt of the outward act, the broth to the allurement of lust within, as it is written, ' And the mixed multitude that was amoncj them fell a lustinc^ ; and the chil- dren of Israel also wept again and said. Who shall give us flesh to eat ? '^ When the angel, then, stretched out his staff and touched the rock, and fire rose out of it, this was a sign that our Lord's flesh, filled with the Spirit of God, should burn up all the sins of the human race. Whence also the Lord says, 'I am come to send fire on the earth.'"* And in the same style he pursues the subject, devoting himself chiefly to proving and enforcing his point.^ 47. An example of the temperate style is the celebrated encomium on virginity from Cyprian : " Now our discourse addresses itself to the virgins, who, as they are the objects of higher honour, are also the objects of greater care. These are the flower on the tree of the Church, the glory and orna- ment of spiritual grace, the joy of honour and praise, a work unbroken and unblemished, the image of God answering to the » Judg. vi. 14-21. n Cor. x. 4. 3 Num. xi. 4. • Luke xii. 49. * De Spiritu Saucto, lib. i. Prol. l.'S ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IV. lioliness of the Lord, the brighter portion of the flock of Christ. The glorious fruitf illness of their mother the Church rejoices in them, and in them flourishes more abundantly ; and in l)roportion as bright virginity adds to her numbers, in the same proportion does the mother's joy increase.' ^ And at another place in the end of the epistle, ' As we have borne,' he says, * the image of the earthly, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.'^ Virginity bears this image, integrity bears it, holiness and truth boar it ; they bear it who are mindful of the chastening of the Lord, who observe justice and piety, who are strong in faith, humble in fear, stedfast in the endur- ance of suffering, meek in the endurance of injury, ready to pity, of one mind and of one heart in brotherly peace. And every one of these things ought ye, holy virgins, to observe, to cherish, and fulfil, who having hearts at leisure for God and for Christ, and having chosen the greater and better part, lead and point the way to the Lord, to whom you have pledged your vows. Ye who are advanced in age, exercise control over the younger. Ye who are younger, wait upon the elders, and encourage your equals ; stir up one another by mutual exhorta- tions ; provoke one another to glory by emulous examples of virtue ; endure bravely, advance in spirituality, finish your course with joy ; only be mindful of us when your vii'ginity shall begin to reap its reward of honour."^ 48. Ambrose also uses the temperate and ornamented style when he is holding up before virgins who have made their profession a model for their imitation, and says : " She was a virgin not in body only, but also in mind ; not mingling the purity of her aff'ection with any dross of hypocrisy ; serious in speech; prudent in disposition; sparing of words; delighting in study; not placing her confidence in uncertain riches, but in the prayer of the poor ; diligent in labour ; reverent in word ; accustomed to look to God, not man, as the guide of her conscience ; injuring no one, wishing well to all ; dutiful to her elders, not envious of her equals ; avoiding boastfulness, following reason, loving virtue. When did she wound her parents even by a look ? Wiien did she quarrel with her • De haUtu Mrglnnm, cliaj). vii. ' 1 Cor. xv. 49. ^ De habit u Virjinum, chap. ,\viii. CHAP. XXI.] AMBROSE ON VIRGINITY. 159 neighbours ? When did she spurn the humble, laugh at the weak, or shun the indigent ? She is accustomed to visit only those haunts of men that pity would not blush for, nor modesty pass by. There is nothing haughty in her eyes, nothing bold in her words, nothing wanton in her gestures : her bearing is not voluptuous, nor her gait too free, nor her voice petulant ; so that her outward appearance is an image of her mind, and a picture of purity. For a good house ought to be known for such at the very threshold, and show at the very entrance that there is no dark recess within, as the light of a lamp set inside sheds its radiance on the outside. Why need I detail her sparingness in food, her superabundance in duty, — the one falling beneath the demands of nature, the other rising above its powers ? The latter has no intervals of intermission, the former doubles the days by fasting ; and when the desire for refreshment does arise, it is satisfied with food such as will support life, but not minister to appetite." -^ Now I have cited these latter passages as examples of the temperate style, because their purpose is not to induce those who have not yet devoted themselves to take the vows of virginity, but to show of what character those who have taken vows ought to be. To prevail on any one to take a step of such a nature and of so great importance, requires that the mind should be excited and set on fire by the majestic style. Cyprian the martyr, however, did not write about the duty of taking up the profession of virginity, but about the dress and deportment of virgins. Yet that great bishop urges them to their duty even in these respects by the power of a majestic eloquence. 49. But I shall select examples of the majestic style from their treatment of a subject which both of them have touched. Both have denounced the women who colour, or rather dis- colour, their faces with paint. And the first, in dealing with this topic, says : " Suppose a painter should depict in colours that rival nature's the features and form and complexion of some man, and that, when the portrait had been finished Avith consummate art, another painter should put his hand over it, as if to improve by his superior skill the painting already completed ; surely the first artist would feel deeply insulted, ^ De Virginihus, lib. ii. chap. i. IGO ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. and his indignation would be justly roused. Dost tliou, then, think that thou wilt carry off with impunity so audacious an act of wickedness, such an insult to God the great artificer ? For, granting that thou art not immodest in thy behaviour towards men, and that thou art not polluted in mind by these meretricious deceits, yet, in corrupting and violating what is God's, thou provest thyself worse than an adulteress. The fact that thou considerest thyself adorned and beautified by such arts is an impeachment of God's handiwork, and a violation of truth. Listen to the warning voice of the apostle : * I'urge out the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness ; but with the un- leavened bread of sincerity and truth.' ^ ISTow can sincerity and truth continue to exist when what is sincere is polluted, and what is true is changed by meretricious colouring and the decep- tions of quackery into a lie ? Thy Lord says, ' Thou canst not make one hair white or black ;'^ and dost thou wish to have greater power so as to bring to nought the words of thy Lord ? With rash and sacrilecrious hand thou wouldst fain chancre the colour of thy hair : I would that, with a prophetic look to the future, thou shouldst dye it the colour of flame." ^ It would lie too long to quote all that follows, 50. Ambrose again, inveighing against such practices, says : " Hence arise these incentives to vice, that women, in their fear that they may not prove attractive to men, paint their faces with carefully-chosen colours, and then from stains on their features go on to stains on their chastity. "What folly it is to change the features of nature into those of a painting, and from fear of incurring their husband's disapproval, to pro- claim openly that they have incurred their own ! For the woman who desires to alter her natural appearance pronounces condemnation on herself; and her eager endeavours to please another prove that she has first been displeasing to hei-self. And what testimony to thine ugliness can we find, O woman, that is more unquestionable than thine own, when thou art afraid to show thyself ? If thou art comely, why dost thou ' 1 Cor. V. 7, 8. ^ ^I;ilt. v. 3G. ' Cyi«riun, (/i halUu Vinjinum, chap. xii. CHAP. XXII.J USE OF VARIETY IX STYLE. 161 hide tliy comeliness ? If tliou art plain, why dost thou lyingly pretend to be beautiful, when thou canst not enjoy the plea- sure of the lie either in thine own consciousness or in that of another ? For he loves another woman, thou desirest to please another man ; and thou art angry if he love another, though he is taught adultery in thee. Thou art the evil promptress of thine own injury. For even the woman who has been the victim of a pander shrinks from acting the pander's part, and though she be vile, it is herself she sins against and not another. The crime of adultery is almost more tolerable than thine ; for adultery tampers with modesty, but thou with nature."^ It is sufficiently clear, I think, that this eloquence calls passionately npon women to avoid tampering with their appearance by deceitful arts, and to cultivate modesty and fear. Accordingly, we notice that the style is neither subdued nor temperate, but majestic throughout. Now in these two authors whom I have selected as specimens of the rest, and in other ecclesiastical writers who both speak the truth and speak it well, — speak it, that is, judiciously, pointedly, and with beauty and power of expression, — many examples may be found of the three styles of speech, scattered through their various writings and discourses ; and the diligent student may by assiduous reading, intermingled with practice on his own part, become thoroughly imbued with them all. Chap. xxii. — The necessity of variety in style. 51. But we are not to suppose that it is against rule to mingle these various styles : on the contrary, every variety of style should be introduced so far as is consistent with good taste. For when we keep monotonously to one style, we fail to retain the hearer's attention; but when we pass from one style to another, the discourse goes off" more gracefully, even though it extend to greater length. Each separate style, again, has varieties of its own which prevent the hearer's attention from cooling or becoming languid. We can bear the subdued style, however, longer without variety than the' majestic style. For the mental emotion which it is necessary to stir up in order to carry the hearer's feelings with us, when 1 Ambrose, de Virginibus, lib. ii. CIIR. DOCT. L 162 ON ciiniSTiAN DOCTRINE. [dooi: :v. once it has been sufficiently excited, tlic lii;^^lier the pitch to whicli it is raised, can be maintained the shorter time. And therefore we must be on our guard, lest, in striving to carry to a higher point the emotion we have excited, we rather lose what we have already gained. But after the interposition of matter that we have to treat in a quieter style, we can return with good effect to that which must be treated forcibly, thus making the tide of eloquence to ebb and flow like the sea. It follows from this, that the majestic style, if it is to be long continued, ought not to be unvaried, but should alternate at intervals with the other styles ; the speech or wTiting as a whole, however, being referred to that style which is the pre- vailing one. CuAP. XXIII. — How the various styles should he mingled. 52. Now it is a matter of importance to determine what style should be alternated with what other, and the places where it is necessary that any particular style should be used. In the majestic style, for instance, it is always, or almost always, desirable that the introduction should be temperate. And the speaker has it in his discretion to use the subdued style even where the majestic would be allowable, in order that the majestic when it is used may be the more majestic by com- parison, and may as it were shine out with greater brilliance from the dark background. Again, whatever may be the style of the speech or writing, when knotty questions turn up for solution, accuracy of distinction is required, and this naturally demands the subdued style. And accordingly tliis style must be used in alternation with the other two styles whenever questions of that sort turn up ; just as we must use A the temperate style, no matter what may be the general tone \of the^TTiscourse, whenever praise or blame is to be given i without any ulterior reference to the condemnation or acquittal of any one, or to obtaining the concurrence of any one in a course of action. In the majestic style, then, and in the quiet likewise, both the other two styles occasionally find place. The temperate style, on the other hand, not indeed always, but occasionally, needs the quiet style ; for example, when, as I have said, a knotty question comes up to be settled, or when some points that arc susceptible of ornament are left unadorned CHAP. XXIV.] THE AUTHOE'S EXPEPJENCE IN MAURITANIA. 1G3 and expressed in the quiet style, in order to give greater effect to certain exuberances (as tliey may be called) of orna- ment. But the temperate style never needs the aid of the majestic ; for its object is to gratify, never to excite, the mind. Chap. xxiv. — The effects produced by the majestic style. 53. If frequent and vehement applause follows a speaker, we are not to suppose on that account that he is speaking in the majestic style ; for this effect is often produced both by the accurate distinctions of the quiet style, and by the beauties of the temperate. The majestic style, on the other hand, frequently silences the audience by its impressiveness, but calls forth their tears. For example, when at Caesarea in Mauritania I was dissuading the people from that civil, or worse than civil, war which they called Caterva (for it was not fellow- citizens merely, but neighbours, brothers, fathers and sons even, who, divided into two factions and armed with stones, fought annually at a certain season of the year for several days continuously, every one killing whomsoever he could), I strove wdth all the vehemence of speech that I could command to root out and drive from their hearts and lives an evil so cruel and inveterate ; it was not, however, when I heard their applause, but when I saw their tears, that I thought I had produced an effect. For the applause showed that they were instructed and delighted, but the tears that they were sabdued. And when I saw their tears I was confident, even before the event proved it, that this horrible and barbarous custom (which had been handed down to them from their fathers and their ancestors of generations long gone by, and which like an enemy was besieging their hearts, or rather had complete possession of them) was overthrown; and imme- diately that my sermon was finished I called upon them with heart and voice to give praise and thanks to God. And, lo, with the blessing of Christ, it is now eight years or more since anything of the sort was attempted there. In many other cases besides I have observed that men show the effect made on them by the powerful eloquence of a wise man, not by clamorous applause so much as by groans, sometimes even by tears, finally by change of life. 164 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. 54. The quiet style, too, has made a change in many ; but it was to teach them what they were ignorant of, or to persuade them of wliat they thought incredible, not to make them do what they knew they ought to do but were unwilling to do. To break down hardness of this sort, speech needs to be vehe- ment. Praise and censure, too, when they are eloquently ex- pressed, even in the temperate style, produce such an eftect on some, that they are not only pleased with the eloquence of the encomiums and censures, but are led to live so as them- selves to deserve praise, and to avoid living so as to incur blame. But no one would say that all who are thus delighted change their habits in consequence, whereas all who are moved by the majestic style act accordingly, and all who are taught by the quiet style know or believe a truth which tliey were previously ignorant of. Chap. xxv. — ITorc the temperate style is to he used. 55. From all this we may conclude, that the end arrived at by the two styles last mentioned is the one which it is most essential for those who aspire to speak with wisdom and eloquence to secure. On the other hand, what the temperate style properly aims at, viz. to please by beauty of expression, is not in itself an adequate end ; but when what we have to say is good and useful, and when the hearers are both ac- quainted with it and favourably disposed towards it, so that it is not necessary either to instruct or persuade them, beauty of style may have its influence in securing their jn-ompter com- pliance, or in making them adhere to it more tenaciously. For as the function of all eloquence, whichever of these three forms it may assume, is to speak persuasively, and its object is to persuade, an eloquent man will speak persuasively, whatever style he may adopt ; but unless he succeeds in persuading, his eloquence has not secured its object. Now in the subdued style, he persuades his hearers that what he says is true ; iii the majestic style, he persuades them to do what they are aware they ought to do, but do not ; in the temperate style, he per- suades them that his speech is elegant and ornate. But Mhat use is there in attaining such an object as this last ? They may desire it who are vain of their eloquence and make a CHAP. XXVI.] USE OF THE TEMPERATE STYLE. 165 boast of panegyrics, and sucli-like performances, where the object is not to instruct the hearer, or to persuade him to any course of action, but merely to give him pleasure. We, how- ever, ought to make that end subordinate to another, viz. the efiecting by this style of eloquence what we aim at effecting when w^e use the majestic style. For we may by the use of this style persuade men to cultivate good habits and give up evil ones, if they are not so hardened as to need the vehement style ; or if they have already begun a good course, we may induce them to pursue it more zealously, and to persevere in it with constancy. Accordingly, even in the temperate st3de we must use beauty of expression not for ostentation, but for wise ends ; not contenting ourselves merely with pleasing the hearer, but rather seeking to aid him in the pursuit of the good end which we hold out before him. Chap. xxvi. — In every jtyle the o rator slioukl aim at perspicuity, beauty, and 2)ersuasiveness. 56. IS'ow in regard to the three conditions I laid down a little while ago ^ as necessary to be fulfilled by any one who wishes to speak with wisdom and eloquence, viz. perspicuity, beauty of style, and persuasive power, we are not to under- stand that these three qualities attach themselves respectively to the three several styles of speech, one to each, so that perspicuity is a merit peculiar to the subdued style, beauty to the temperate, and persuasive power to the majestic. On the contrary, all speech, whatever its style, ought constantly to aim at, and as far as possible to disj)lay, all these three merits. For we do not like even what we say in the subdued style to pall upon the hearer ; and therefore w^e would be listened to, not with intelligence merely, but with pleasure as well. Again, why do we enforce what we teach by divine testimony, except that we wish to carry the hearer wdth us, that is, to compel his assent by calling in the assistance of Him of whom it is said, " Thy testimonies are very sure " ? ^ And when any one narrates a story, even in the subdued style, what does he wish but to be believed ? But who will listen to him if he do not arrest attention by some beauty of style ? And if he be not intelligible, is it not plain that he can ^ Chnps. XV. and xvii, " Vs. xciii. 5. IGC ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [bOOK IV. neither give pleasure nor enforce conviction ? The subdued style, again, in its own naked simplicity, when it unravels questions of very great difficulty, and throws an unexpected light upon tlicm ; when it worms out and brings to light some very acute observations from a quarter whence nothing was expected ; when it seizes upon and exposes the falsity of an opposing opinion, which seemed at its first statement to be unassailable ; especially when all this is accompanied by a natural, unsought gi^ace of expression, and by a rhythm and balance of style which is not ostentatiously obtruded, but seems rather to be called forth by the nature of the subject : this style, so used, frequently calls forth applause so great that one can hardly believe it to be the subdued style. For the fact that it comes forth without either ornament or defence, and offers battle in its own naked simplicity, does not hinder it from crushing its adversary by weiglit of nerve and muscle, and overwhelming and destroying the falsehood that opposes it by the mere strength of its own right arm. How exjdain the frequent and vehement applause tliat waits upon men who speak thus, except by the pleasure that truth so irresistibly established, and so victoriously defended, naturally affords ? Wherefore the Christian teacher and speaker ought, when he uses the subdued style, to endeavour not only to be clear and intelligible, but to give pleasure and to bring home conviction to the hearer. 57. Eloquence of the temperate style, also, must, in the case of the Christian orator, be neither altogether without ornament, nor unsuitably adorned nor is it to make the giving of pleasure its sole aim, which is all it professes to accomplish in the hands of oiliers ; but in its encomiums and censures it sliould aim at inducing the hearer to strive after or h()h\ more firmly by what it praises, and to avoid or renounce wliat it condemns. On the other hand, witliout perspicuity this style cannot give pleasure. And so the three qualities, perspicuity, beauty, and persuasiveness, are to be sought in this style also ; beauty, of coiu'se, being its primary object. 58. Again, when it becomes necessary to stir and sway the hearer's mind by the majestic style (and this is always neces- CITAP. XXVII.] THE POWER OF A HOLY LIFE. 167 sary when lie admits tliat w^liat you say is both true and agreeable, and yet is unwilling to act accordingly), you must, of course, speak in the majestic style. But who can be moved if he does not understand what is said ? and who will stay to listen if he receives no pleasure ? Wherefore, in this style, too, when an obdurate heart is to be persuaded to obedience, you must speak so as to be both intelligible and pleasing, if you would be heard with a submissive mind. Chap, xxvii. — The man whose life i s in harmony with his te aching will teach with gr eater eff ect. 59. But whatever may be the majesty of the style, the life of the speaker will count for more in securing the hearer's compliance. The man who speaks wisely and eloquently, but lives wickedly, may, it is true, instruct many who are anxious to learn ; though, as it is written, he " is unprofitable to him- self." ^ Wherefore, also, the apostle says : " Whether in pretence or in truth Christ is preached." ^ ISTow Christ is the truth ; yet we see that the truth can be preached, though not in truth, — that is, what is right and true in itself may be preached by a man of perverse and deceitful mind. And thus it is that Jesus Christ is preached by those that seek their own, and not the things that are Jesus Christ's. But since true believers obey the voice, not of any man, but of the Lord Himself, who says, " All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do : but do not ye after their works ; for they say and do not ; " ^ therefore it is that men who themselves lead unprofitable lives are heard with profit by others. For though they seek their own objects, they do not dare to teach their own doctrines, sitting as they do in the high places of ecclesiastical authority, which is established on sound doctrine. Wherefore our Lord Himself, before saying what I have just quoted about men of this stamp, made this observation : " The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat." * The seat they occupied, then, which was not theirs but Moses', compelled them to say what was good, though they did what was evil. And so they followed their own course in their lives, but were prevented by the seat they occupied ' Ecclus. xxxvii. 19. ^ pyj^ j jg. 3 Matt, xxiii. 3. * 21att. xxiii. 2. J 1G8 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. [BOOK IV. which belonged to anotlier, from preaching their own doc- trines. 60. Xow these men do good to many by preaching what they themselves do not perform ; but they would do good to very many more if they lived as they preach. For there are numbers who seek an excuse for their own evil lives in comparing the teaching with the conduct of their instructors, and who say in their hearts, or even go a little further, and say with their lips : Wliy do you not do yourself what you bid me do ? And thus they cease to listen with submission to a man who does not listen to himself, and in despising the preacher they learn to despise the w^ord that is preached. Wlierefore the apostle, writing to Timothy, after telling him, " Let no man despise thy youth," adds immediately the course by which he would avoid contempt : " but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity." ^ CiiAP. xxviii. — Truth is more important than expression. What is meant 1>if strife about words. 61. Such a teacher as is here described may, to secure compliance, speak not only quietly and temperately, but even vehemently, without any breach of modesty, because his life protects him against contempt. For while he pursues an up- right life, he takes care to maintain a good reputation as well, providing things honest in the sight of God and men," fearing God, and caring for men. In his very speech even lie prefers to please by matter rather than by words ; thinks that a thing is well said in proportion as it is true in fact, and tliat a teacher should govern his words, not let the words govern him. This is what the apostle says : " Not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none eftect." ^ To the same effect also is what he says to Timotliy : " Charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no })rorit, but to the subverting of the hearers." * Kow this does not mean that, when adversaries oppose the truth, we are to say nothing in defence of tlie truth. For where, then, would be wliat he says wlien lie is describing the sort of man a ' 1 Tim. iv. 12. so Cor. viii. 21. M Cur. ii. 17. •• 2 Tim ii. 14. CHAP. XXIX.] ELOQUENCE WITHOUT WISDOM VAIX. 169 bishop ought to be : " that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and convince the gainsayers"?^ To strive about words is not to be careful about the way to overcome error by truth, but to be anxious that your mode of expression should be preferred to that of another. The man who does not strive about words, whether he speak quietly, temperately, or vehe- mently, uses words with no other purpose than to make the truth plain, pleasing, and effective ; for not even love itself, which is the end of the commandment and the fulfilling of the law,^ can be rightly exercised unless the objects of love are true and not false. For as a man with a comely body but an ill-conditioned mind is a more painful object than if his body too were deformed, so men who teach lies are the more pitiable if they happen to be eloquent in speech. To speak eloquently, then, and wisely as w^ell, is just to express truths which it is expedient to teach in fit and proper words, — words which in the subdued style are adequate, in the temperate, elegant, and in the majestic, forcible. But the man who cannot speal^ both eloquently and wisely should speak wisely without elo-j quence, rather than eloquently without wisdom. Chap. xxix. — It is permissible for a preacher to deliver to the people ivhat has been written by a more eloquent man than himself. If, however, he cannot do even this, let his life be such as shall not only secure a reward for himself, but afford an example to others ; and let his manner of living be an elo- quent sermon in itself. 63. There are, indeed, some men who have a good delivery, but cannot compose anything to deliver. Now, if such men take what has been written with wisdom and eloquence by others, and commit it to memory, and deliver it to the people, they cannot be blamed, supposing them to do it without de- ception. For in this way many become preachers of the truth (which is certainly desirable), and yet not many teachers ; for all deliver the discourse which one real teacher has com- posed, and there are no divisions among them, j^or are such men to be alarmed by the words of Jeremiah the prophet, through whom God denounces those who steal His words every one from his neighbour.^ For those who steal take what ^ Tit. i. 9. 2 1 Tim. i. 5 and r.cm. xiii. 10. ^ Jcr. xxiii. 30. 170 ON CHRISTIAN DOCTrJNE. [BOOK IV. / does not belong to tliem, hut the word of God belongs to all who obey it ; and it is the man who speaks well, but lives badly, who really takes the words that belong to another. For the good things he says seem to be the result of his own thought, and yet they have nothing in common with his manner of life. And so God has said that they steal His words who would appear good by speaking God's words, but are in fact bad, as they follow their own ways. And if you look closely into the matter, it is not really themselves who say the good things they say. For how can they say in words what they deny in deeds ? It is not for nothing that the apostle says of such men : " Tliey profess that they know God, but in works they deny Him."^ In one sense, then, they do say the things, and in another sense they do not say them ; for both these statements must be true, both being made by Him who is the Truth. Speaking of such men, in one place He says, " Wliat- soever they bid you observe, that observe and do ; but do not ye after their works;" — that is to say, what ye hear from their lips, that do ; what ye see in their lives, that do ye not ; — " for they say and do not." ^ And so, though they do not, yet they say. But in another place, upbraiding such men, He says, " O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things ?"^ And from this it would appear that even what they say, when they say what is good, it is not themselves who say, for in will and in deed they deny what they say. Hence it happens that a Avicked man who is eloquent may compose a discourse in which the trutli is set forth to be de- livered by a good man who is not eloquent ; and when this takes place, the former draws from himself what does not be- long to him, and the latter receives from another what really f belongs to liimself. Lut when true believers render this ser- vice to true believers, both parties speak what is their own, for God is tlieirs, to whom belongs all tliat they say ; and even those who could not composi; what they say make it their own by composing their lives in liarmony witli it. Chat. xxx. — Tlie preacher should commence his discourse trilh prayer to God. Go. r.ut whether a man is going to address the people or to »Tit. i. IG. 2 Matt, xxiii. 3. » Matt. xii. 34. CHAP. XXXI.] END OF THE WOKK. 171 dictate what others will deliver or read to the people, he ought to pray God to put into his mouth a suitable discourse. For if Queen Esther prayed, when she was about to speak to the king touching the temporal welfare of her race, that God would put fit words into her mouth,^ how much more ought he to pray for the same blessing who labours in word and doctrine for the eternal welfare of men ? Those, again, who are to deliver what others compose for them ought, before they receive their discourse, to pray for those who are preparing it; and when they have received it, they ought to pray both that they themselves may deliver it well, and that those to whom they address it may give ear ; and when the discourse has a happy issue, they ought to render thanks to Him from whom they know such blessings come, so that all the praise may be His " in whose hand are both we and our words." ^ Chap. xxxi. — Apology for the length of the ivorlc. 64. This book has extended to a greater length than I ex- pected or desired. But the reader or hearer who finds pleasure in it will not think it long. He who thinks it long, but is anxious to know its contents, may read it in parts. He who does not care to be acquainted with it need not complain of its length. I, however, give thanks to God that with what little ability i possess I have in these four books striven to depict, not the sort of man I am myself (for my defects are very many), but the sort of man he ought to be who desires to labour in sound, that is, in Christian doctrine, not for his own instruction only, but for that of others also. 1 Estli. iv. 16 (LXX.). 2 ^Yi,^d^ ^-^^ IC^ THE ENCHIRIDION OF AUGUSTINE, ADDRESSED TO LAURENTIUS ; BEING A TKEATISE ON FAITH, HOPE, AND LOVE. 178 THE ENCHIRIDION OF AUGUSTINE, ADDRESSED TO LAURENTIUS ; BEING A TEEATISE ON FAITH, HOPE, AND LOVE. ARGUMENT. LAUllENTIUS HAVING ASKED AUGUSTINE TO FURNISH HIM WITH A HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE, CONTAINING IN BRIEF COMPASS ANSWERS TO SEVERAL QUESTIONS WHICH HE HAD PROPOSED, AUGUSTINE SHOWS HIM THAT THESE QUESTIONS CAN BE FULLY ANSWERED BY ANY ONE WHO KNOWS THE PROPER OBJECTS OF FAITH, HOPE, AND LOVE. HE THEN PROCEEDS, IN THE FIRST PART OF THE WORK (CHAP. IX.-CXIII.), TO EXPOUND THE OBJECTS OF FAITH, TAKING AS HIS TEXT THE APOSTLES' CREED ; AND IN THE COURSE OF THIS EXPOSITION, BESIDES REFUTING DIVERS HERESIES, HE THROWS OUT MANY OBSERVATIONS ON THE CONDUCT OF LIFE, THE SECOND PART OF THE WORK (CHAP. CXIV.-CXVI.) TREATS OF THE OBJECTS OF HOPE, AND CONSISTS OF A VERY BRIEF EXPOSITION OF THE SEVERAL PETITIONS IN THE LORD's PRAYER. THE THIRD AND CONCLUDING PART (CHAP. CXVII.-CXXH.) TREATS OF THE OBJECTS OF LOVE, SHOWING THE PRE-EMINENCE OF THIS GRACE IN THE GOSPEL SYSTEM, THAT IT IS THE END OF THE COMMANDMENT AND THE FULFILLING OF THE LAW, AND THAT GOD HIMSELF IS LOVE. Chap. i. — The autlior desires the gift of true lulsdomfor Lanrent'ms. I CANNOT express, my beloved sou Laurentius, the delight with which I witness your progress in knowledge, and the earnest desire I have that you should be a wise man : not one of those of whom it is said, " Where is the wise ? wliere is the scribe ? where is the disputer of this world ? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world ?"^ but one of those of whom it is said, " The multitude of the wise is the welfare of the world," ^ and such as the apostle wishes » 1 Cor. i. 20. ' Wisil. vi. 24. 175 176 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. III. those to become, whom he tells, " I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil."^ Now, just as no one can exist of himself, so no one can be wise of himself, but only by the enlightening influence of II im of whom it is written, " All wisdom cometh from the Lord'- CiiAr. II. — The fear of God is man's t7'ne wisdom. The true wisdom of man is piety. You find this in the book of Job. For we read there what wisdom itself has said to man : " Behold, the fear of the Lord [2nctas], that is wis- dom."^ If you ask further what is meant in that place by pictas, the Greek calls it more definitely Oeoo-e/^eLa, that is, the worship of God. The Greeks sometimes call piety evai- /3eta, which signifies right worship, though this, of course, refers specially to the worship of God. But when we are defining in what man's true wisdom consists, the most con- venient word to use is that wdiich distinctly expresses the fear of God. And can you, who are anxious that I should treat of great matters in few words, wish for a briefer form of expression ? Or perhaps you are anxious that this ex- pression should itself be briefly explained, and that I should unfold in a short discourse the proper mode of worsliipping God? CiiAr. III. — God is to he worshipped through faith, hope, ayid love. Now if I should answer, that God is to be w^orshipped with faith, hope, and love, you will at once say that this answer is too brief, and wiU ask me briefly to unfold the objects of each of these three graces, viz., what w^e are to beHeve, what we are to hope for, and what we are to love. And ^\ hen I have done this, you will have an answer to all the questions you asked in your letter. If you have kept a copy of your letter, you can easily turn it up and read it over again : if you have not, you will have no diihculty in recalling it when I refresh your memory. 1 Rom. xvi. 19. ' Ecclus. i. 1. 'Job xxviii. 23. CHAP, v.] THE QUESTIONS OF LAUEENTIUS. 177 Chap. iv. — The questions propounded by Laurentius. You are anxious, you say, that I should write a sort of handbook for you, which you might always keep beside you, containing answers to the questions you put, viz. : what ought to be man's chief end in life ; what he ought, in view of the various heresies, chiefly to avoid ; to what extent religion is supported by reason ; what there is in reason that lends no support to faith, when faith stands alone ; what is the starting-^ point, what the goal, of religion ; what is the sum of the whole . |body of doctrine ; what is the sure and proper foundation of the catholic faith. Now, undoubtedly, you will know the answers to all these questions, if you know thoroughly the proper objects of faith, hope, and love. For these must be the^ chief, nay, the exclusive objects of pursuit in religion. He who speaks against these is either a total stranger to the name of Christ, or is a heretic. These are to be defended by reason, which must have its starting-point either in the bodily senses or in the intuitions of the mind. And what we have neither had experience of through our bodily senses, nor have been able to reach through the intellect, must undoubtedly be believed on the testimony of those witnesses by whom the Scriptures, justly called divine, were written ; and who by divine assistance were enabled, either through bodily sense or intellectual perception, to see or to foresee the things in question. Chap. v. — Brief ansivers to these questions. Moreover, w^hen the mind has been imbued with the first elements of that faith which worketh by love,^ it endeavours by purity of life to attain unto sight, where the pure and per- fect in heart know that unspeakable beauty, the full vision of which is supreme happiness. Here surely is an answer to your question as to what is the starting-point, and what the goal : we begin in faith, and are made perfect by sight. This also is the sum of the whole body of doctrine. But the sure and proper foundation of the catholic faith is Christ. " For other foundation," says the apostle, " can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ."- Nor are we to deny that this » Gal. y. 6.. = i Cor. iil 11. ENCHIR. M 173 THE ENCHIKIDION. [CHAP. VII. is the proper foundation of the catholic faith, because it may be supposed that some heretics hold this in common with us. For if we carefully consider the things that pertain to Christ, we sliall find that, among those heretics who call themselves Christians, Christ is present in name only : in deed and in truth He is not among them. But to show this would occupy us too long, for we should require to go over all the heresies which have existed, which do exist, or which could exist, under the Christian name, and to show that this is true in the case of each, — a discussion which would occupy so many volumes as to be all but interminable. Chap. vi. — Controversy out of place in a handhooh like the present. Now you ask of me a handbook, that is, one that can be carried iu the hand, not one to load your shelves. To return, then, to the three graces through which, as I have said, God should be worshipped — faith, hope, and love : to state what are the true and proper oljjects of each of these is easy. But to defend this true doctrine against the assaults of those who hold an opposite opinion, requires much fuller and more elabo- rate instruction. And the true way to obtain this instruction is not to have a short treatise put into one's hands, but to have a great zeal kindled in one's heart. Chap. vii. — The Creed and the Lord's Prayer demand the exercise offailh, hope, and love. For you have the Creed and the Lord's Prayer. \Miat can be briefer to hear or to read ? What easier to commit to memory ? When, as the result of sin, the human race was groaning under a heavy load of misery, and was in urgent need of the divine compassion, one of the prophets, anticipating the time of God's gi-ace, declared : " And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered."^ Hence the Lord's Prayer. But the apostle, when, for the purpose of commending this very grace, he had quoted this prophetic testimony, immediately added : " How then sh.'iU they call on Him in whom they have not believed?"^ Hence the Creed. In these two you have those three graces exemplified : faith believes, hope and love pray. But without 1 Joel ii. 32. ' Horn. x. 1 1. CHAP. VIII.] FAITH AND HOPE DISTINGUISHED. 179 faith tlie two last cannot exist, and therefore we may say that faith also prays. Whence it is written : " How shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed ?" Chap. viii. — The distinction between faith and hope, and the mutual dependence of faith, hope, and love. Again, can anything be hoped for which is not an object of faith ? It is true that a thing which is not an object of hope may be believed. What true Christian, for example, does not believe in the punishment of the wicked ? And yet such an one does not hope for it. And the man who believes that punishment to be hanging over himself, and who shrinks in horror from the prospect, is more properly said to fear than to hope. And these two states of mind the poet carefully dis- tinguishes, when he says : " Permit the fearful to have hope."-^ Another poet, who is usually much superior to this one, makes . a wrong use of the word, when he says ; " If I have been able to hope for so great a grief as this."^ And some grammarians take this case as an example of impropriety of speech, saying, " He said spcrare [to hope] instead of timcre [to fear]." Ac- cordingly, faith may have for its object evil as well as good ; for both good and evil are believed, and the faith that believes them is not evil, but good. Faith, moreover, is concerned with the past, the present, and the future, all three. We believe, for example, that Christ died, — an event in the past; we believe that He is sitting at the right hand of God, — a state of things which is present ; w^e believe that He will come to judge the quick and the dead, — an event of the future. Again, faith applies both to one's own circumstances and those of others. Every ^ one, for example, believes that his own existence had a begin- ning, and was not eternal, and he believes the same both of other men and other things. Many of our beliefs in regard to religious matters, again, have reference not merely to other men, but to angels also. But hope has for its object only what is good, only what is future, and only what affects the man who entertains the hope. For these reasons, then, faith must be distinguished from hope, not merely as a matter of verbal pro- priety, but because they are essentially different. The fact that we do not see either what we believe or what we hope for, ^ Lucan, Phars. ii. 15. 2 Virgil, ^Eneid, iv. 419. 180 THE EN'ciimiDioN. [chap. IX. is all that is common to faitli and ho[)e. In the Epistle to the Hebrews, for example, faith is defined (and eminent de- fenders of the catholic faith have used the definition as a standard) "the evidence of things not seen."^ Although, should any one say that he believes, that is, has grounded his faith, not on words, nor on witnesses, nor on any reasoning whatever, but on the direct evidence of his own senses, he would not be guilty of such an impropriety of speech as to be justly liable to the criticism, " You saw, therefore you did not believe." And hence it does not follow that an object of faith is not an object of sight. But it is better that we should use the word " faith " as the Scriptures have taught us, applying it to those things which are not seen. Concerning hope, again, the apostle says : " Hope that is seen is not hope ; for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for ? But if we hope for tliat we see not, then do we with patience wait for it."^ When, then, w^e believe that good is about to come, this is nothing else but to hope for it. Now what shall I say of love ? /^Without it, faith profits nothing ; and in its absence, hope ; cannot exist. The Apostle James says : " The devils also believe, and tremble,"^ — that is, they, having neither hope nor love, but believing that what we love and hope for is about to come, are in terror. And so the Apostle Paul approves and commends the " faitli that worketh by love ;" * and this cer- tainly cannot exist without hope. AVlierefore there is no f love without hope, no hope without love, and neither love nor ^hope without faith. Chap. ix. — What we are to believe. In regard to nature it is not necessary for tlie Christian to know more than that the goodness of the Creator is the cause of all things. jjfr When, then, the question is asked what we are to believe in regard to religion, it is not necessary to probe into the nature of things, as was done by those whom tlic Greeks QdX[ plufsici ; nor need we be in alarm lest the Christian sliould be ignorant of the force and number of the elements, — the motion, and order, and eclipses of the heavenly bodies ; the form of the heavens ; the species and the natures of animals, plants, stones, ' Heb. xi. 1. = Rom. viii. 24, 25. * » Jas. ii. I'J. * Gal. v. 6. CHAP. XI.] THE NATURE OF EVIL. 181 fountains, rivers, mountains ; about chronology and distances ; the signs of coming storms ; and a thousand other things which those philosophers either have found out, or think they have found out. For even these men themselves, endowed though they are with so much genius, burning with zeal, abounding in leisure, tracking some things by the aid of human conjecture, searching into others with the aids of history and experience, have not found out all things ; and even their boasted dis- coveries are oftener mere guesses than certain knowledge. It is enough for the Christian to believe that the only cause of all created things, whether heavenly or earthly, whether visible or invisible, is the goodness of the Creator, the one true God ; and that nothing exists but Himself that does not derive its existence from Him ; and that He is the Trinity — to wit, the Father, and the Son begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeding from the same Father, but one and the same Spirit of Father and Son. Chap. x. — The supremely good Creator made all tilings good. ^ By the Trinity, thus supremely and equally and unchange- ably good, all things were created ; and these are not supremely and equally and unchangeably good, but yet they are good, even taken separately. Taken as a wdiole, however, they are very good, because their ensemble constitutes the universe in all its wonderful order and beauty. Chap, xt.— What is called evil in the universe is hut the absence of good. And in the universe, even that which is called evil, when it is regulated and put in its own place, only enhances our ad- miration of the good ; for we enjoy and value the good more /when we compare it with the evil. For the Almighty God, / w^ho, as even the heathen acknowledge, has supreme power over j all things, being Himself supremely good, would never permit I the existence of anything evil among His works, if He were I not so omnipotent and good that He can bring good even out \ of evil. For what is that which we call evil but the absence of good ? In the bodies of animals, disease and wounds mean "nothing -but the absence of health ; for when a cure is effected, that does not mean that the evils which were present ..A^ l'^2 TUT- KNCHIPJDION. [CHAP. XII. — namely, the diseases and wounds — go away from the body and dwell elsewhere : they altogether cease to exist ; for the wound or disease is not a substance, but a defect in the fleshly substance, — the flesh itself being a substance, and therefore something good, of which those evils — that is^^ivations of the i^ood which we call health — are accidents. Just in the same I way, what are called vices in the soul are nothing but privations f of natural good. And when they are cured, they are not trans- ferred elsewhere : when they cease to exist in the healthy soul, they cannot exist anywhere else. Chap. xii. — AH beings were made good, Imt not being made perfectly good, are ^ ■ liable to corruption. All things that exist, therefore, seeing that the Creator of them all is supremely good, are themselves good. But because . they , are not, like their Creator, supremely and unchangeably good, their good may be diminished and increased. But for / good to be diminished is an evil, although, however mucli it may be diminished, it is necessary, if the being is to continue, | that some good should remain to constitute the being. For! however small or of whatever kind the being may be, the good which makes it a being cannot be destroyed without destroy- ing the being itself An uncorrupted nature is justly held in esteem. But if, still further, it be incorruptible, it is un- doubtedly considered of still higher value. When it is cor- rupted, however, its corruption is an evil, because it is deprived of some sort of good. For if it be deprived of no good, it receives no injury ; but it does receive injury, therefore it is deprived of good. Therefore, so long as a being is in process of corruption, there is in it some good of which it is beinc: deprived ; and if a part of the being should remain which cannot be corrupted, this will certainly be an incorruptible being, and accordingly the process of corruption will result in the manifestation of tliis groat good. But if it do not cease to I be corrupted, neither can it cease to possess good of which cor-/ ruption may deprive it. But if it should be thoroughly and I completely consumed by corruption, there will then be no good left, because there will be no being. Wherefore corruption can consume the good oidy by consuming the being. Every being, therefore, is a good ; a great good, if it cannot be cor- CHAP. XIII.] EVIL ALWAYS CO-EXISTS WITH GOOD. 183 rupted ; a little good, if it can : but in any case, only the foolish or ignorant will deny that it is a good. And if it be wholly consumed by corruption, then the corruption itself must cease to exist, as there is no being left in which it can dwell. Chap. xiii. — Tliere can he no evil where there is no good ; and an evil man is an evil good. Accordingly, there is nothing of what we call evil, if there be nothing good. But a good which is wholly without evil is a perfect good. A good, on the other hand, which contains evil is a faulty or imperfect good; and there can be no evil where there is no good. From all this we arrive at the curious result : that since every being, so far as it is a being, is good, when we say that a faulty being is an evil being, we just seem to say that what is good is evil, and that nothing • but what is good can be evil, seeing that every being is good, and that no evil can exist except in a being. Nothing, then, A can be evil except something which is good. And although this, when stated, seems to be a contradiction, yet the strict- ness of reasoning leaves us no escape from the conclusion. We must, however, beware of incurring the prophetic condem- nation : " Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil : that put darkness for light, and light for darkness : that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter."^ And yet our Lord says : " An evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil."^ Now, what is an evil man but an evil being ? for a man is a being. Now, if a man is a good thing because he is a being, what is an evil man but an evil good ? Yet, when we accurately distinguish these two things, we find that it is not because he is a man that he is an evil, or because he is wicked that he is a good ; but that he is a good because he is a man, and an evil because he is wicked. Whoever, then, says, "To be a man is an evil," or,/ "To be wicked is a good," falls under the prophetic de- nunciation : " Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil !" For he condemns the work of God, which is the man, and praises the defect of man, which is the wickedness. Therefore every being, even if it be a defective one, in so far as it is a being is good, and in so far as it is defective is evil. 1 Isa. V. 20. 2 Luke vi. 45. 184 THE ENcmrvTDioN. [chap. xv. Chap. xiv. — Good and evil are an exception to the rnl^ that contrary attrlhufes cannot be predicated of the same subject. Evil sprliifjs up in what is good, and cannot exist except in what is good. Accordingly, in the case of these contraries which we call good and evil, the rule of the logicians, that two contraries cannot be predicated at tlie same time of the same thing, does not hold. No weather is at the same time dark and bright : no food or drink is at the same time sweet and bitter : no body is at the same time and in the same place black and white : none is at the same time and in the same place de- formed and beautiful. And this rule is found to hold in regard to many, indeed nearly all, contraries, that they cannot exist at the same time in any one thing. But although no one can doubt that good and evil are contraries, not only can they exist at the same time, but evil cannot exist without good, or in anything that is not good. Good, however, can exist without evil. For a man or an angel can exist without b eing wick ed ; but_ nothing can be wicked except a man or an angeli and so far as he is a man or an angel, he is good ; so far as he is wicked, he is an evil. And tliese two contraries are so far co-existent, that if good did not exist in what is evil, neither could evil exist ; because corruption could not have either a place to dwell in, or a source to spring from, if there were nothing that could be corrupted ; and nothing can be corrupted except what is good, for corruption is nothing else but the destruction of good. From what is good, then, evils arose, and except in what is good they do not exist ; nor was there any other source from which any evil nature could arise. For if there were, then, in so far as this was a being, it was certainly a good : and a being which was incorruptil^le would be a great good ; and even one which was corruptible must be to some extent a good, for only by corrupting what _^was good in it could corruption do it harm. Chap. xv. — The preceding argument is in no wise inconsistent with the saying of our Lord : " A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit." But when we say that evil springs out of good, let it not be thought that this contradicts our Lord's saying : " A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit."* For, as He who is the Truth 'Matt. vii. 18. CHAP. XVl] THE CAUSES OF GOOD AND EVIL. 185 says, you cannot gather grapes of thorns/ because grapes do not grow on thorns. But we see that on good soil both vines and thorns may be grown. And in the same way, just as an evil tree cannot bring forth good fruit, so an evil will cannot produce good works. But from the nature of man, which is good, may spring either a good or an evil will. And certainly there was at first no source from which an evil will could spring, except the nature of angel or of man, which was good. And our Lord Himself clearly shows this in the very same place where He speaks about the tree and its fruit. For He says : " Either make the tree good, and his fruit good ; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt,"^ — clearly enough warning us that evil fruits do not grow on a good tree, nor good fruits on an evil tree ; but that nevertheless the ground itself, by which He meant those whom He was then address- ing, might grow either kind of trees. Chap. xvi. — It is not essential to man's happiness that he should hioio the causes of physical convulsions j hut it is, that he should know the causes of good and evil. Kow, in view of these considerations, when we are pleased with that line of Maro, " Happy the man who has attained to the knowledge of the causes of things,"^ we should not suppose that it is necessary to happiness to know the causes of the great physical convulsions, causes which lie hid in the most secret recesses of nature's kingdom, " whence comes the earthquake whose force makes the deep seas to swell and burst their barriers, and again to return upon themselves and settle down."^ But we ought to know the causes of good and evil as far as man may in this life know them, in order to avoid the mistakes and troubles of which this life is so full. For our aim must always be to reach that state of happiness in which no trouble shall distress us, and no error mislead us. If we must know the causes of physical convulsions, there are none which it concerns us more to know than those which affect our own health. But seeing that, in our ignorance of these, we are fain to resort to physicians, it would seem that we might bear with considerable patience our ignorance of the secrets that lie hid in the earth and heavens. 1 Matt. vii. 16. ^ j^jatt. xii. 33. 3 yji-gn, Geonfics, ii. 4'JO. ^ Ih. 186 THE ENcnir.TDio::. [chap. xvii. Chap. xvii. — The nature of error. AU n-ror is not hurtful, thoitgh it is man's duty aft far as possible to avoid it. For altliongli we ought with the greatest possible care to avoid error, not only in great but even in little things, and although we cannot err except through ignorance, it does not follow that, if a man is ignorant of a thing, he must forthwith fall into error. That is rather the fate of the man who thinks he knows what he does not know. For he accepts what is false as if it were true, and that is the essence of error. But it is a point of very great importance what the subject is in regard to which a man makes a mistake. For on one and the same subject we rightly prefer an instructed man to an ignorant one, and a man who is not in error to one who is. In the case of different subjects, however, — that is, when one man knows one thing, and another a different thing, and when what the former knows is useful, and what the latter knows is not so useful, or is actually hurtful, — who would not, in regard to the things the latter knows, prefer the ignorance of the former to the knowledge of the latter ? For there are points on which ignorance is better than knowledge. And in the same way, it has sometimes been an advantage to depart from the right way, — in travelling, however, not in morals. It has happened to myself to take the wrong road where two ways met, so that I did not pass by the place where an armed band of Donatists lay in wait for me. Yet I arrived at the place whither I was bent, though by a roundabout route ; and when I heard of the ambush, I congi\atulated myself on my mistake, and gave thanks to God for it. Now, who would not rather be the traveller who made a mistake like this, than the highwayman who made no mistake ? And hence, perhaps, it is that tlie prince of poets puts these words into the mouth of a lover in misery:^ "How I am undone, how I have been carried away by an e\'il error!" for there is an error which is good, as it not merely does no harm, but pro- duces some actual advantage. But when we look more closely into the nature of truth, and consider that to err is just to take tlie false for tlie true, and the true for the false, or to hold what is ccrtiun as uiut-rtain, and what is uncertain as * Virgil, Eclo'j. viii. 41. CHAP. XVIII.] EREOr. DISTINGUISHED FROM FALSEHOOD. 187 certain, and that error in the soul is hideous and repulsive just in proportion as it appears fair and plausible when we utter it, or assent to it, saying, " Yea, yea ; Nay, nay," — surely this life that we live is wretched indeed, if only on this account, that sometimes, in order to preserve it, it is necessary to fall into error. God forbid that such should be that other life, where truth itself is the life of the soul, where no one deceives, and no one is deceived. But here men deceive and are deceived, and they are more to be pitied when they lead others astray than when they are themselves led astray by putting trust in liars. Yet so much does a rational soul shrink from what is false, and so earnestly does it struggle against error, that even those who love to deceive are most unwillinfT to be deceived. For the liar does not think that he errs, but that he leads another who trusts him into error. And certainly he does not err in regard to the matter about which he lies, if he himself knows the truth ; but he is deceived in this, that he thinks his lie does him no harm, whereas every sin is more hurtful to the sinner than to the sinned against. Chap, xviii. — It is never alloivahle to tell a lie; hut lies differ very much in guilt, according to the intention and the subject. But here arises a very difficult and very intricate question, about which I once wrote a large book, finding it necessary to give it an answer. The question is this : whether at any y time it can become the duty of a good man to tell a lie ? For some go so far as to contend that there are occasions on which it is a good and pious work to commit perjury even, and to say what is false about matters that relate to the worship of God, and about the very nature of God Himself Tq _ me , however^ it seems certain t hat e very _ lia,- isL_2L_sin, thou!:jh it makes a great difference with what intention and on what subject one lies. For the sin of the man who tells a lie to help another is not so heinous as that of the man who tells a lie to injure another ; and the man who by his lying puts a traveller on the wrong road, does not do so much harm as the man who by false or misleading representations distorts the whole course of a life. No one, of course, is to be con- demned as a liar who says what is false, believing it to be true, because such an one does not consciously deceive, but 188 THE ExcniPJDiON. [chap. xix. rather is himself deceived. And, on the same principle, a man is not to he accused of lying, though he may sometimes be open to the charge of rashness, if through carelessness he takes up what is false and holds it as true ; but, on the other hand, the man who says what is true, believing it to be false, is, so far as his own consciousness is concerned, a liar. For in saying what he does not believe, he says what to his own conscience is false, even though it should in fact be true ; nor is the man in any sense free from lying who with his mouth speaks the truth without knowing it, but in his heart wills to tell a lie. And, therefore, not looking at the matter spoken of, but solely at the intention of the speaker, the man who unwittingly says what is false, thinking all the time that it is ' true, is a better man than the one who unwittingly says what , ^ is true, but in his conscience intends to deceive. Tor the » Y^ ^ former does not think one thing and say another ; but the U\i ^ latter, though his statements may be true in fact, has one . ^ thought in his heart and another on his lips : and that is the very essence of lying. But when w^e come to consider truth and falsehood in respect to the subjects spoken of, the point J on which one deceives or is deceived becomes a matter of the ^ 'utmost importance. For although, as far as a man's own conscience is concerned, it is a greater evil to deceive than to be deceived, nevertheless it is a far less evil to tell a lie in» 4 regard to matters that do not relate to religion, than to be led into error in regard to matters the knowledge and belief o^ which are essential to the right worship of God. To illus- trate this by example : Suppose that one man should say of some one who is dead that he is still alive, knowing this to be untrue ; and that another man should, being deceived, believe that Christ shall at the end of some time (make the time as long as you please) die ; would it not be incomparably better to lie like the former, than to be deceived like the latter ? and would it not be a much less evil to lead some man into tlie former error, than to be hd by any man into the latter ? CilAi'. XIX. — Men's errorx vanj very much in the inognUmle of the evils th(y produce; but yet every error is in itst/j'an evil. In some things, then, it is a great evil to be deceived ; in souic it is a small evil ; in some no evil at all ; and in some '>: CHAP. XIX. ] ERROR ALWAYS AN EVIL. 189 it is an actual advantage. It is to his grievous injury that a man is deceived when he does not believe what leads to eternal life, or believes what leads to eternal death. It is a small evil for a man to be deceived, when, by taking falsehood for truth, he brings upon himself temporal annoyances ; for the patience of the believer will turn even these to a good use, as when, for example, taking a bad man for a good, he receives injury from him. But one who believes a bad man to be good, and yet suffers no injury, is nothing the worse for being deceived, nor does he fall under the prophetic denunciation : " Woe to those who call evil good ! " ^ For we are to understand that this is spoken not about evil men, but about the things that make men evil. Hence the man who calls adultery good, falls justly under that prophetic denunciation. But the man who calls the adulterer good, thinking him to be chaste, and not knowing him to be an adulterer, falls into no error in regard to the nature of good and evil, but only makes a mistake as to the secrets of human conduct. He calls the man good on the ground of believing him to be what is un- doubtedly good ; he calls the adulterer evil, and the pure man good ; and he calls this man good, not knowing him to be an adulterer, but believing him to be pure. " Further, if by making a mistake one escape death, as I have said above once happened to me, one even derives some advantage from one's mistake. But when I assert that in certain cases a man may be deceived without any injury to himself, or even with some advantage to himself, I do not mean that the mistake in itself is no evil, or is in any sense a good ; I refer only to the evil that is avoided, or the advantasje that is gained, throucfh making the mistake. For the mistake, considered in itself, is an evil : a great evil if it concern a great matter, a small evil if it concern a small matter, but yet always an evil. For who that is of sound mind can deny that it is an evil to receive what is false as if it were true, and to reject what is true as if it were false, or to hold what is uncertain as certain, and what is certain as uncertain ? But it is one thing to think a man good when he is really bad, which is a mistake ; it is another thing to suffer no ulterior injury in consequence of * Isa. V. 20. 100 THE ENcniriDio::. [chap. xx. the mistake, supposing that the bad man whom we think good inflicts no damage upon us. In the same way, it is one thing to think that we are on the right road when we are not ; it is an- other thing when this mistake of ours, which is an evil, leads to some good, such as saving us from an ambush of wicked men. Chap. xx. — Every error is not a sin. An examination of the opinion of the Academic ijhUosophcrs, that to avoid trror we s/u/uld in all capita suspend beliif. I am not sure whether mistakes such as the following, — when one forms a good opinion of a bad man, not knowing what sort of man he is ; or when, instead of the ordinary perceptions through the bodily senses, other appearances of a similar kind present themselves, which we perceive in the spirit, but think we perceive in the body, or perceive in the body, but think we perceive in the spirit (such a mistake as the Apostle Peter made when the angel suddenly freed him from his chains and imprisonment, and he thought he saw a vision^) ; or when, in the case of sensible objects themselves, we mistake roudi for smooth, or bitter for sweet, or think that putrid matter has a good smell ; or when we mistake the passing of a carriage for thunder ; or mistake one man for another, the two being very much alike, as often happens in the case of twins (hence our great poet calls it " a mistake pleasing to parents " ^), — whether these, and other mistakes of this kind, ought to be called sins. Nor do I now undertake to solve a very knotty question, which perplexed those very acute thinkers, the Academic philosophers : whether a wise man ought to give his assent to anything, seeing that he may fall into error by assenting to falsehood : for all things, as they assert, are either unknown or uncertain. Now I wrote three .volumes shortly after my conversion, to remove out ot my way the objections which lie, as it were, on the very threshold of faith. And assuredly it was necessary at the very outset to remove this utter despair of reaching truth, which seems to be ^strengthened by the arguments of these philosophers. Now in their eyes every en-or is regarded as a sin, and they think tliat error can only be avoided by entii'ely suspending belief. For they say that the man who assents to what is uncertain ^ AcU xii. 9. ' Virgil, .£n. x. 392. CHAP. XXI.] EHROR NOT ALWAYS SIX. 191 falls into error; and they strive by the most acute, but most audacious arguments, to show that, even though a man's opinion should by chance be true, yet that there is no certainty of its truth, owing to the impossibility of distinguishing truth from falsehood. But with us, " the just shall live by faith." ^ Now, if assent be taken away, faith goes too ; for without assent there can be no belief. And there are truths, whether we know them or not, which must be believed if we would attain to a happy life, that is, to eternal life. But I am not sure whether one ought to argue with men who not only do not know that there is an eternal life before them, but do not know whether they are living at the present moment ; nay, say that f^y^^^ they do not know what it is impossible they can be ignorant of. For it is impossible that any one should be ignorant that jQ4..<.y he is alive, seeing that if he be not alive it is impossible for him to be ignorant ; for not knowledge merely, but ignorance too, can be an attribute only of the living. But, forsooth, they think that by not acknowledging that they are alive they avoid error, when even their very error proves that they are alive, since one who is not alive cannot err. As, then, it is not only true, but certain, that we are alive, so there are many other things both true and certain ; and God forbid that it should ever be called wisdom, and not the height of folly, to refuse assent to these. Chap. xxi. — Error, iliongli not always a sin, is always an evil. But as to those matters in regard to which our belief or disbelief, and indeed their truth or supposed truth or falsity, are of no importance whatever, so far as attaining the kingdom of God is concerned : to make a mistake in such matters is not to be looked on as a sin, or at least as a very small and trifling sin. In short, a mistake in matters of this kind, what- ever its nature and magnitude, does not relate to the way of approach to God, which is the faith of Christ that " worketh by love."^ For the "mistake pleasing to parents " in the case of the twin children was no deviation from this way ; nor did the Apostle Peter deviate from this way, when, thinking that he saw a vision, he so mistook one thing for another, that, till the iRom. i. 17. ^Gal. V. 6. 102 THE ENCHiniDION. [CITAP. XXII. angel who delivered him had departed from him, he did not distinguish the real objects among which he was moving from the visionary objects of a dream ;^ nor did the patriarch Jacob deviate from tliis way, when he believed tliat liis son, who was really alive, had been slain by a beast.^ In the case of these and otlier false impressions of the same kind, we are indeed deceived, but our faith in God remains secure. We go astray, but we do not leave the way that leads us to Him. But yet these errors, though they are not sinful, are to be reckoned among the evils of this life, which is so far made subject to vanity, that we receive what is false as if it were true, reject what is true as if it were false, and clincr to what is uncertain as if it were certain. And although they do not trench upon tliat true and certain faith through wliich we reach eternal blessedness, yet they have much to do with that misery in which we are now living. And assuredly, if we were now in the enjoyment of the true and perfect happiness that lies before us, we should not be subject to any deception through any sense, whether of body or of miud. CiiAr. XXII. — A lie is not aUowalle, even to save another from injury. But every lie must be called a sin, because not only when a man knows the truth, but even when, as a man may be, he is mistaken and deceived, it is his duty to say what he thinks in his heart, whether it be true, or whether he only think it to be true. But every liar says the opposite of wliat he thinks in his heart, with purpose to deceive. Now it is evident that speech was given to man, not that men might therewith de- ceive one another, but that one man might make known his thoughts to another. To use speech, tlien, for the purpose of deception, and not for its appointed end, is a sin. Nor are we to suppose that there is any lie that is not a sin, because it is sometimes possible, by telling a lie, to do service to another. For it is ]X)ssible to do this by tlieft also, as when we steal from a ricli man wlio never feels the loss, to give to a poor man who is sensibly benefited by what he gets. And the same can be said of adultery also, when, for instance, some woman appears likely to die of love unless we consent to her > Acts xii. 9-11. » Gen. xxxvii. 33. CHAP. XXIV.] SUMMARY OF RESULTS. 193 wishes, while if she lived she might purify herself by repent- ance ; but yet no one will assert that on this account such an adultery is not a sin. And if we justly place so high a value upon chastity, what offence have we taken at truth, that, while no prospect of advantage to another will lead us to violate the former by adultery, we should be ready to violate the latter by lying ? It cannot be denied that they have attained a very high standard of goodness who never lie except to save a man from injury ; but in the case of men who have reached this standard, it is not the deceit, but their good intention, that is justly praised, and sometimes even rewarded. It is quite enough that the deception shoidd be pardoned, without its being made an object of laudation, especially among the heirs of the new covenant, to whom it is said : " Let your communication be. Yea, yea ; Nay, nay : for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil."-'- And it is on account of this evil, which never ceases to creep in while we retain this mortal vesture, that the co-heirs of Christ themselves say, " Forgive us our debts." ^ Chap, xxiii. — Summary of the results of iJie precedlnr/ discussion. As it is right that we should know the causes of good and — ^ evil, so much of them at least as will suf&ce for the way that leads us to the kingdom, where there will be life without the shadow of death, truth without any alloy of error, and happiness unbroken by any sorrow, I have discussed these subjects with the brevity which my limited space demanded. And I think there cannot now be any doubt, that the only cause of any good that we enjoy is the goodness of God, and that the only cause of evil is the falling away from the un- changeable good of a being made good but changeable, first in the case of an angel, and afterwards in the case of man. Chap. xxiv. — The secondary causes of evil are ignorance and lust. This is the first evil that befell the intelligent creation — ^ that is, its first privation of good. Following upon this crept in, and now even in opposition to man's will, ignorance of'' duty, and lust after what is hurtful : and these brought in their ^ Matt. V. 37. 2 ^xatt. vi. 12. ENCHIK. N 104 THE EN'CnirJDION. [CITAP. XXVI. train error and ■'^vff'>'riiuj, wliich, when they are felt to be imminent, produce that shrinking of the mind which is called fear. Further, when the mind attains the objects of its desire, however hurtful or empty they may be, error prevents it from perceiving their true nature, or its perceptions are overborne by a diseased appetite, and so it is puffed up with :i foolish joy. From these fountains of evil, which spring out of defect rather than superfluity, flows every form of misery that besets a rational nature. Chap. xxv.—GocVs judgments vpon fallen men and angels. Tlie death of the body is man's peculiar punishment. And yet such a nature, in the midst of all its evils, could not lose the craving after happiness. Now the evils I have mentioned are common to all who for their wickedness have been justly condemned by God, whether they be men or angels. But there is one form of punislmient peculiar to man — the death of the body. God had threatened him with this punish- ment of death if he should sin,^ leavincir him indeed to the freedom of his own will, but yet commanding his obedience under pain of death ; and He placed him amid the happiness of Eden, as it w^ere in a protected nook of life, with the intention that, if he preserved his righteousness, he should thence ascend to a better place. CiiAr. xxxi.— Through Adam's f^in h>s whole posterUy wrre corrupted, and were horn under the penalty of death, ichich he had incurred. Thence, after his sin, he was driven into exile, and by his sin tlie whole race of which he was the root was corrupted in him, and thereby subjected to the penalty of death. And so it happens that all descended from him, and from the woman who liad led him into sin, and was condemned at the same time with him, — being the offspring of carnal lust on which the same punishment of disobedience was visited, — were tainted with the original sin, and were by it drawn through divers errors and sufferings into that last and endless punish- ment which they suffer in common with the fallen angels, their corrupters and masters, and the partakers of their doom. And thus " by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin ; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have « Gen. ii. 17. CHAP. XXVII.] T\IAX'S FALL AND RESTOEATIOX. 195 sinned" ^ By " the world " tile apostle, of course, means in this place the whole human race. Chap, xxvii. — The state of misenj to which Adam's sin reduced manlind, and the restoration effected through the mercy of God. Thus, then, matters stood. The whole mass of the human race was under condemnation, was lying steeped and wallowing in misery, and was being tossed from one form of evil to another, and, having joined the faction of the fallen angels, was paying the well-merited penalty of that impious rebellion. For whatever the wicked freely do through blind and unbridled lust, and whatever they suffer against their will in the way of open punishment, this all evidently pertains to the just wrath of God. But the goodness of the Creator never fails either to , supply life and vital power to the wicked angels (without which their existence would soon come to an end) ; or, in the case of mankind, who spring from a condemned and corrupt stock, to impart form and life to their seed, to fashion their members, and through the various seasons of their life, and in the different parts of the earth, to quicken their senses, and bestow upon them the nourishment they need. For He judged it better to bring good out of evil, than not to permit any evil to exist. And if He had determined that in the case of men, as in the case of the fallen angels, there should be no restoration to happiness, would it not have been quite just, that the being who rebelled against God, who in the abuse of his freedom spurned and transgressed the command of his Creator when he could so easily have kept it, who defaced in himself the image of his Creator by stubbornly turning away from His light, who by an evil use of his free-will broke away from his wholesome bondage to the Creator's laws, — would it not have been just that such a being should have been wholly and to all eternity deserted by God, and left to suffer the everlasting punishment he had so richly earned ? Certainly so God would have done, had He been only just and not also merciful, and had He not designed that His unmerited mercy should shine forth the more brightly in contrast with the unworthiness of its objects. 1 Rom. V. ]2. 1 G THE ENCmrJDTON. [CHAP. XXIX. Chap, xxviii. — Ulieti (he reheUlous aiujds were ca.it out, the rest remained hi the enjoyment of eternal happiness with God. VTinht some of the angels, then, in their pride and impiety rebelled against God, and were cast down from their heavenly abode into the lowest darkness, the remaining number dwelt with God in eternal and unchanging purity and happiness. For all were not sprung from one angel who had fallen and been condemned, so that they were not all, like men, involved by one original sin in the bonds of an inherited guilt, and so made subject to the penalty which one had incurred ; but when he, who afterwards became the devil, was with his asso- ciates in crime exalted in pride, and by that very exaltation was with them cast down, the rest remained stedfast in piety and obedience to their Lord, and obtained, what before they had not enjoyed, a sure and certain knowledge of their eternal safety, and freedom from the possibility of fall, CuAP. XXIX. — The restored part of humanity shall, in accordance with the promises of God, succeed to the place which the rehellious angels lost. And so it pleased God, the Creator and Governor of the universe, that, since the whole body of the angels had not fallen into rebellion, the part of them which had fallen should remain in perdition eternally, and that the other part, which had in the rebellion remained stedfastly loyal, should rejoice in the sure and certain knowledge of their eternal happiness; but that, on the other hand, mankind, who con- stituted the remainder of the intelligent creation, having perished without exception under sin, both original and actual, and the consequent punishments, should be in part restored, and should fill up the gap which the rebellion and fall of the devils had left in the company of the angels. For this is the promise to the saints, that at the resurrection they shall be equal to the angels of God.^ And thus the Jerusalem which is above, which is tlie mother of us all, the city of God, shall not be spoiled of any of the number of her citizens, shall perhaps reign over even a more abundant population. "We do not know the number cither of the saints or of the devils ; but we know tliat the cliildren of the holy mother who was called barren on earth shall succeed to the place of the fallen ' Luke XX. 3G. CHAP. XXX.] MAN SAVED BY GRACE. 197 angels, and shall dwell for ever in that peaceful abode from, which they fell. But the number of the citizens, whether as it now is or as it shall be, is present to the thoughts of the great Creator, who calls those things which be not as though they were,^ and ordereth all things in measure, and number, and weight.^ Chap. xxx. — Men are not saved hy rjood worls, nor hy the free determination of ^\^ . their own will, hut hy the grace of God th'oiigh faith. l 1 T^ But this part of the human race to which God has promised pardon and a share in His eternal kingdom, can they be restored throuQ;h the merit of their own works ? God forbid. — o For what good work can a lost man perform, except so far as he has been delivered from perdition ? Can they do anything ^by the free determination of their own will ? Again I say, ^God forbid. For it was by the evil use of his free-wiU V. that man destroyed both it and himself For, as a man who j kills himself must, of course, be alive when he kills himself, I but after he has killed himself ceases to live, and cannot j restore himself to life ; so, when man by his own free-wiU \ sinned, then sin being victorious over him, the freedom of his I will was lost. "For of whom a man is overcome, ot the same is he brought in bondage."^ This is the judgment of the Apostle Peter. And as it is certainly true, what kind of liberty, I ask, can the bond-slave possess, except when it pleases him to sin ? For he is freely in bondage who does with pleasure the will of his master. Accordingly, he who is the servant of sin is free to sin. And hence he will not be free to do right, until, being ^reed from sin, he shall begin to be the servant of righteousness. And this is true liberty, for he has pleasure in the righteous deed ; and it is at the same time a holy bondage, for he is obedient to the wiU of God. But whence comes this liberty to do right to the man who is in bondage and sold under sin, except he be redeemed by Him who has said, "If the Son shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed"?* And before this redemption is wrought in a man, when he is not yet free to do what is right, how can he talk of the freedom of his will and his good works, except he be inflated by that foolish pride of boasting whidi the apostle » Eom. iv. 17. 2 ^Yisj. xi. 20. ^ 2 Tct. ii. 19. * John viii. 36. ^ 198 THE ENCiiirjDiox. [chap, xxxit. restrains when he says, " By grace are ye saved, through faith."^ CiiAP. xxxr. — Falih itself Is the rj\ft of God ; and good icorks will not he wanting ill those who believe. And lest men should arrogate to themselves the merit of their own faith at least, not understanding that this too is the gift of God, this same apostle, who says in another place that he had " obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful,"^ here also adds : " and that not of yourselves ; it is the gift of God : not of works, lest any man should boast." ^ And lest it should be thought that good works will be wanting in those who believe, he adds further : " For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."* We shall be made truly free, then, when God fashions us, that is, forms and creates us anew, not as men — for He has done that already — but as good men, which His grace is now doing, that we may be a new creation in Christ Jesus, according as it is said : " Create in me a clean heart, God."^ For God had already created his heart, so far as the physical structure of the human heart is concerned ; but the psalmist prays for the renewal of the life which was still lin^^erinGr in his heart. o o CuAP. XXXII. — The freedom of the will is also the rjift of God, for God worlceth ill us both to will and to do. And further, should any one be inclined to boast, not in- deed of his works, but of the freedom of his will, as if the first merit belonged to him, this very liberty of good action being given to liiiii as a reward he had earned, let him listen to this same preacher of grace, when he says : " For it is God which worketh in you, both to will and to do of His own good plea- sure ; " " and in another place : " So, then, it is not of him that willeth, nor of liim that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." ^ / Now as, undoubtedly, if a man is of the age to use his reason, he cannot believe, hope, love, unless he will to do so, nor obtain the prize of the high calling of God unless he voluntarily run for it ; in wliat sense is it " not of him that willuth, nor of him that runnetli, but of God that showeth > Eph. ii. 8. » 1 Cor. vii. 25. • Ej.h. ii. 8. 9. *Eph. ii. 10. ''Vs. Ii. 10. c pi^ ii. i'^^ 7 i-^^j. i_^_ 1(3^ CHAP. XXXII.] GRACE AND FREE-WILL. 199 mercy," except that, as it is written, " the preparation of the heart is from the Lord"?^ Otherwise, if it is said, "It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy," because it is of both, that is, both of the will of man and of the mercy of God, so that we are to under- stand the saying, " It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy," as if it meant the will of man alone is not sufficient, if the mercy of God go not with it, — then it will follow that the mercy of God alone is not sufficient, if the will of man go not with it ; and there- fore, if we may rightly say, " it is not of man that willeth, but of God that showeth mercy," because the will of man by itself is not enough, why may we not also rightly put it in the converse way : " It is not of God that showeth mercy, but of man that willeth," because the mercy of God by itself does not suffice ? Surely, if no Christian will dare to say this, " It is not of God that showeth mercy, but of man that willeth," lest he should openly contradict the apostle, it follows that the true interpretation of the saying, " It is not of him that wiUeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy," is that the whole work belongs to God, who both makes the will of man righteous, and thus prepares it for assistance, and assists it when it is prepared. For the man's righteousness of will precedes many of God's gifts, but not all ; and it must itself be included among; those which it does not precede. We read in Holy Scripture, both that God's mercy " shall prevent me,"^ and that His mercy "shall follow me."^ It prevents the unwilling to make him willing; it follows the willing to make his will effectual. Why are we taught to pray for our enemies,^ who are plainly unwilling to lead a holy life, unless that God may work willingness in them ? And why are we ourselves taught to ask that we may receive,^ unless that He who has created in us the wish, may Himself satisfy the wish ? We pray, then, for our enemies, tliat the mercy of God may prevent them, as it has prevented us : we pray for ourselves that His mercy may follow us. » Prov. xvi. 1. * Ps. lix. 10. ^ Ps. xxiii. 6. ♦ Matt. V. 4i. 6 Matt. vii. 7. 200 THE ENcniPJDiox. [chap, xxxiit. Chap, xxxiii. — Mcu, hrlng hy nature thf rhlhlrrn of icrnth, needed a Mediator. In what sense God is said to be an'jri/. And SO tlie human race was lying under a just condemna- tion, and all men were the children of wrath. Of which ^v^ath it is written : " All our days are passed away in Thy wrath ; we spend our years as a tale that is told." ^ Of which wrath also Job says : " Man that is horn of a woman is of few days, and full of trouble." "" Of which wrath also the Lord Jesus says : " He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life : and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life ; but the wrath of God abideth on him." ^ He does not say it will come, but it "abideth on him." For every man is born with it; wherefore the apostle says : " We were by nature the children of wrath, even as others."* Now, as men were lying under this AVTath by reason of their original sin, and as this original sin was the more heavy and deadly in proportion to the num- ber and magnitude of the actual sins which were added to it, there was need for a Mediator, that is, for a reconciler, who, by the offering of one sacrifice, of which all the sacrifices of the law and the prophets were types, should take away this wrath. "Wherefore the apostle says : " For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more, being reconciled, w^e shall be saved by His life." " Now when God is said to be angry, we do not attribute to Him such a disturbed feeling as exists in the mind of an angry man ; but we call His_just displeasure against sin by the name " anger," a word transferred by analogy from human emotions. But our being reconciled to God through a Mediator, and receiving the Holy Spirit, so that we who were enemies are made sons (" For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God " ^) : this is the grace of God tlirough Jesus Christ our Lord. Chap. XXXIV. — The inrjfallc mystery ofthrhirfh of Chri,st (he 2Iediator through the Virgin Mary. Now of this Mediator it would occupy too much space to • Ps. xc. 9. '.Tobxiv. 1. 3 John iii. 36. These words, attributed by the author to Christ, were really spoken by John the Baptist. ♦ Eph. ii. 3. * Rom. v. 10. « Fiom. viii. 14. CHAP. XXXV.] THE BIRTH OF CHRIST. 201 say anything at all worthy of Him ; and, indeed, to say what is worthy of Him is not in the power of man. For who will explain in consistent words this single statement, that " the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us," ^ so that we may believe on the only Son of God the Father Almighty, born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Mavy ? The meaning of the Word being made flesh, is not that the divine nature was cliauged into flesh, but that the divine nature assum^ our flesh. And by " flesh " we are here to understand " man," the part being put for the whole, as when it is said : " By the deeds of the law shall no flesh be justified," ^ that is, no man. For we must believe that no part was wanting in that human nature which He put on, save that it was a nature wholly free from every taint of sin, — not such a nature as is conceived ^ between the two sexes through carnal lust, which is born in ' sin, and whose guilt is washed away in regeneration ; but such as it behoved a virgin to brincj forth, when the mother's faith, i not her lust, was the condition of conception. And if her virginity had been marred even in bringing Him forth. He would not have been born of a virgin ; and it would be false (which God forbid) that He was born of the Virgin Mary, as is believed and declared by the whole Church, which, in imitation of His mother, daily brings forth members of His body, and yet remains a virgin. Eead, if you please, my letter on the virginity of the holy Mary which I sent to that eminent man, whose name I mention with respect and affection, Volusianus.^ Chap. xxxv. — Jesus Christ, being the only Son of God, is at the same time man. Wherefore Christ Jesus, the Son of God, is both God and man ; God before all worlds ; man in our world : God, because ^the Word of God (for "the Word was God " ^) ; and man, because in His one person the Word was joined with a body and a rational soul. Wherefore, so far as He is God, He and the Father are one ; so far as He is man, the Father is greater than He. For when He was the only Son of God, not by grace, but by nature, that He might be also full of gTace, He became the Son of man ; and He Himself unites both natures 1 Joliu i. 14. 2 p^om. iii. 20. 3 ^^ jo; « j^_,jji^ i ^ ) 202 THE ENcnirJDToy. [cnAP. xxxvi. in His own identity, and botli natures constitute one Christ ; because, " being in the form of God, He thought it not robbery to be," wliat He was by nature, " equal with God." ^ But He made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Himself the form of a servant, not losing or lessening the form of God. And, accordingly, He was both made less and remained equal, being both in one, as has been said : but He w^as one of these as Word, and the other as man. As Word, He is equal with the Father ; as man, less than the Father. S^ne Son of God, and at the same time Son of man ; one Son of man, and at the same time Son of God ; not two Bons of God, God and man, but one Son of God : God without beginning ; man with a beginning, our Lord Jesus Christ. CuAr. XXXVI. — The grace of God is clearly and remarl-ahly dif^played in raising the man Christ Jesus to the dignity of the Son of God. Now ]iere the grace of God is displayed with the greatest power and clearness. For what merit had the human nature in the man Christ earned, that it should in this unparalleled way be taken up into the unity of the person of the only Son of God ? Wliat goodness of will, what goodness of desire and intention, what good works, had gone before, which made this man worthy to become one person with God ? Had He been a man previously to this, and had He earned this unpre- cedented reward, that He should be thought worthy to become God ? Assuredly nay ; from the very moment that He began to be man. He was nothing else than the Son of God, the only Son of God, the Word who was made flesh, and therefore He was God ; so that just as each individual man unites in one person a body and a rational soul, so Christ in one person unites the Word and man. Now wherefore was this unheard of glory conferred on human nature, — a glory which, as there was no antecedent merit, was of course wholly of grace, — except that here those who looked at the matter soberly and honestly might behold a clear manifestation of the power of God's free grace, and might understand that they are justified from their sins by the same grace which made the man Christ Jesus free from the possibility of sin ? And so the angel, when he announced to Christ's motlier the coming birth, saluted her 1 Phil. ii.6. CHAP. XXXYIL] CHrJST BOEN OF THE HOLY SriFJT. 203 thus : " Hail, thou that art full of grace ; " -^ and shortly after- wards, " Thou hast found grace with God." ^ Now she was said to be full of grace, and to have found grace with God, because she was to be the mother of her Lord, nay, of the Lord of all flesh. But, speakiug of Christ Himself, the evan- gelist John, after saying, " The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us," adds, " and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth." ^ When he says, " The Word was made flesh," this is " full of grace ; " when he says, " the glory of the only-begotten of the Father," this is " full of truth." For the Truth Himself, who was the only-begotten of the Father, not by grace, but by nature, by grace took our humanity upon Him, and so united it with His own person that He Himself became also the Son of man. Chap, xxxvii. — Tlie same grace is furtliei'- clearly manifested hi this, that the birth of Christ according to the flesh is of the Holy Ghost. For the same Jesus Christ who is the only-begotten, that is, the only Son of God, our Lord, was born of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary. And we know that the Holy Spirit is the gift of God, the gift being Himself indeed equal to the Giver. And therefore the Holy Spirit also is God, not inferior to the Father and the Son. The fact, therefore, that the nati- vity of Christ in His human nature was by the Holy Spirit, is another clear manifestation of grace. For when the Virgin asked the angel how this which he had announced should be, seeing she knew not a man, the angel answered, " The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee : therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God."* And when Josex^h was minded to put her away, suspecting her of adultery, as he knew she was not with child by himself, he was told by the angel, " Fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife ; for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost :"^ that is, what thou suspectest to be begotten of another man is of the Holy Ghost. ' Luke i. 28 ("Thou that art highly favoured," A. Y.). 2 Luke i. 30 (*' Thou hast iomid favour \Yith God," A. Y.). 3 John i. 14. * Luke i. 35. * 21att. i. 20. 204 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CIIAP. XXXVIIL Chat, xxxviii. — Jcsiis CJirist, according to thejiex/i, wa.f not lorn of the Holy Sjnrit in such a sense that the Holy Spirit is His father. Nevertheless, are we on this account to say that the Holy Ghost is the fatlier of the man Christ, and that as God the Father begat the Word, so God the Holy Spirit begat the man, and that these two natures constitute the one Christ ; and that as the Word He is the Son of God the Father, and as man the Son of God the Holy Spirit, because the Holy Spirit as His fatlier begat Him of the Virgin Mary ? Who will dare to say so ? Nor is it necessary to show by reasoning how many other absurdities flow from this supposition, when it is itself so absurd that no believer's ears can bear to hear it. Hence, as we confess, " Our Lord Jesus Christ, who of God is God, and as man was born of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, having both natures, the divine and the human, is the only Son of God the Father Almighty, from whom proceedeth the Holy Spirit."^ Now in what sense do we say that Christ was born of the Holy Spirit, if the Holy Spirit did not beget Him ? Is it that He made Him, since our Lord Jesus Christ, though as God " all things were made by Him," ^ yet as man was Himself made ; as the apostle says, " who was made of the seed of David according to the flesh " ? ^ But as that created thing which the Virgin conceived and brought forth, though it was united only to the person of the Son, was made by the whole Trinity (for the works of the Trinity are not separable), why should the Holy Spirit alone be mentioned as having made it ? Or is it that, when one of the Three is mentioned as the author of any work, the whole Trinity is to be understood as working ? That is true, and can be proved by examples. But we need not dwell longer on this solution. For the puzzle is, in what sense it is said, " born of the Holy Ghost," when He is in no sense the Son of the Holy Ghost ? For though God made this world, it would not be right to say that it is the Son of God, or that it was born of God ; we would say that it was created, or made, or framed, or ordered by Him, or whatever form of (.'xpression we can properly use. ^ A quotation from a form of tlie Apostles' Creed anciently in use in the Latin Church. ^ John i. 3. » r.om. i. 3. CHAP. XL.] CHniST NOT THE SON OF THE HOLY SPITJT. 205 ' Here, then, when we make confession that Christ was born of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, it is difficult to explain how it is that He is not the Son of the Holy Ghost and is the Son of the Virgin Mary, when He was born both of Him and of her. It is clear beyond a doubt that He was not born of the Holy Spirit as His father, in the same sense that He was born of the Virgin as His mother. Chap, xxxix. — Not everything that is horn of another is to he called a son of that other. We need not therefore take for granted, that whatever is born of a thing is forthwith to be declared the son of that thing. For, to pass over the fact that a son is born of a man in a different sense from that in which a hair or a louse is born of him, neither of these being a son ; to pass over this, I say, as too mean a n ill ustration for a subject of so much importance : it is certain that those who are born of water and of the Holy Spirit cannot with propriety be called sons of the water, though they are called sons of God the Father, and of ^ the Church their mother. In the same way, then. He who 1 was born of the Holy Spirit is the Son of God the Father, not \ of the Holy Spirit. For what I have said of the hair and the other things is sufficient to show us that not everything which is born of another can be called the son of that of which it is born, just as it does not follow that all who are called a man's sons were born of him, for some sons are adopted. And some men are called sons of hell, not as being born of hell, but as prepared for it, as the sons of the kingdom are prepared for the kingdom. Chap, xl. — Christ's hirth through the Holy Spirit manifests to us the grace of God. And, therefore, as one thing may be born of another, and yet not in such a way as to be its son, and as not every one who is called a son was born of him whose son he is called, it is clear that this arrangement by which Christ was born of the Holy Spirit, but not as His son, and of the Virgin Mary as her son, is intended as a manifestation of the grace (of God. For it was by this grace that a man, without any antecedent merit, was at the very commencement of His existence as man, so united in one person with the Word of 20 G THE EXcnmiDioN. [chap, xll God, that the very person who was Son of man was at the Bame time Son of God, and the very person who was Son of God was at the same time Son of man; and in the adoption of His human nature into the divine, the grace itself became in a way so natural to the man, as to leave no room for the entrance of sin. Wlierefore this grace is signified by the Holy Spirit ; for He, though in His own nature God, may also be called the gift of God. And to explain all this sufiiciently, if indeed it could be done at all, would require a very lencrthened discussion. o Chap. xli. — Christ, who was Himself free from sin, was made sin for us, that Jk we might be reconciled to God. Begotten and conceived, then, without any indulgence of carnal lust, and therefore bringing with Him no original sin, and by the grace of God joined and united in a wonderful and unspeakable way in one person with the Word, the Only- begotten of the Father, a son by nature, not by grace, and therefore having no sin of His own; nevertheless, on account of the likeness of sinful flesh in which He came,! He was called sin, that He might be sacrificed to wash away sin. For, under the Old Covenant, sacrifices for sin were called sins.^ And He, of whom all these sacrifices were types and shadows, was Himself truly made sin. j Hence the apostle, after say- ing, " We pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God," forthwith adds : " for He hath made Him to be sin for us who knew no sin ; that we might be made the righteous- ness of God in Him."^ He does not say, as some incorrect copies read, " He who knew no sin did sin for us," as if Christ had Himself sinned for our sakes ; but he says, " Him who knew no sin," that is, Christ, God, to whom we are to be reconciled, " hath made to be sin for us," that is, hath made Him a sacrifice for our sins, by which we might be reconciled to God. He, then, being made sin, just as we are made rigliteousness (our righteousness being not our own, but God's, not in ourselves, but in Him) ; He being made sin, not His own, but ours, not in Himself, but in us, showed, by the likeness of sinful flcsli in wliich He was crucified, tliat tliough sin was not in Him, yet tluit in a certain sense He died to nios. iv. 8. «2Coi. V. 20. 21. CHAP. XLIV.] TvEGENERATION AND BAPTIS:\L 207 sin, by dying in the flesh which was the likeness of sin ; and that although He Himself had never lived the old life of sin, yet by His resurrection He typified our new life springing up out of the old death in sin. Chap. xlii. — The sacrament of baptism indicates our death with Christ to sin, and our resurrection with Him to neivness of life. And this is the meaning of the great sacrament of baptism which is solemnized among us, that all who attain to this grace should die to sin, as He is said to have died to sin, because He died in the flesh, which is the likeness of sin ; and rising from the font regenerate, as He arose alive from the grave, should begin a new life in the Spirit, whatever may be the age of the body. Chap, xliii. — Baptism and the grace which it typifies are open to all, both infants and adults. For from the infant newly born to the old man bent with age, as there is none shut out from baptism, so there is none who in baptism does not die to sin. But infants die only to original sin ; those who are older die also to all the sins which their evil lives have added to the sin which they brought with tliem. Chap. xliv. — In speahing of sin, the singular number is often put for the plural, and the plural for the singular. But even these latter are frequently said to die to sin, though undoubtedly they die not to one sin, but to all the numerous actual sins they have committed in thought, word, or deed : for the singular number is often put for the plural, as when the ]Doet says, " They fill its belly with the armed soldier,"^ though in the case here referred to there were many soldiers concerned. And we read in our own Scrip- tures : " Pray to the Lord, that He take away the serpent from us."^ He does not say serpents, though the people were suffering from many ; and so in other cases. When, on the other hand, the original sin is expressed in the plural number, as when we say that infants are baptized for the remission of sins, instead of saying for the remission of sin, this is the converse figure of speech, by which the plural number is ^ ** Fterumque armato milite complent." — Vikgil, xEn. ii. 20. * Kum, xxi. 7 ('* scri)ents, " A.V.). 2 OS THE ENCHIRIDION. [CIIAP. XLY. put in place of the singular ; as in the Gospel it is said of the death of Herod, "for they are dead wliich sought the young child's life,"* instead of saying, *' he is dead." And in Exodus : " They have made them," Moses says, " gods of gold,"^ tliough they had made only one calf, of which they said : " These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt," ^ — here, too, putting the plural in place of the singular. CuAP. XLV. — In Adam" s first sin, many hinds of sin were involved. However, even in that one sin, which " by one man entered into the world, and so passed upon all men,"^ and on account of which infants are baptized, a number of distinct sins may be observed, if it be analyzed as it were into its separate elements. For there is in it pride, because man chose to be under his own dominion, rather than under the dominion of God ; and blasphemy, because he did not believe God ; and murder, for he brought death upon himself; and spiritual fornication, for the purity of the human soul was corrupted by the seducing blandishments of the serpent; and theft, for man turned to his own use the food he had been forbidden to touch ; and avarice, for he had a craving for more than should have been sufficient for him ; and whatever other sin can be discovered on careful reilection to be involved in this one admitted sin. CuAr. XLVI. — It is prohahle that children are involved in the guilt not only of tlic firM jHiiry hut of their own immediate imrenis. And it is said, with much appearance of probability, that infants are involved in the guilt of the sins not only of the first pair, but of their own immediate parents. For that divine judgment, " I shall visit the iniquities of the fathers upon the children,"'^ certainly applies to them before they come under the new covenant by regeneration. And it was this new covenant that was prophesied of, when it was said by Ezeldel, that the sons should not bear the iniquity of the fathers, and that it should no longer be a proverb in Israel, "Tlie fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the childi'en's 1 Matt ii. 20. ' Ex. xxxii. 81. ' Ex. xxxii. 4. * liom. V. 12. ' Ex. XX. 6 j Deut. v. 9. CHAP. XLVII.] OPJGINAL SIN. 209 teeth are set on edge."^ Here lies the necessity that each man should be born again, that he might be freed from the sin in which he was born. For the sins committed after- wards can be cured by penitence, as we see is the case after baptism. And therefore the new birth would not have been appointed only that the first birth was sinful, so sinful that even one who was legitimately born in wedlock says : " I was shapen in iniquities, and in sins did my mother conceive me."^ He did not say in iniquity, or in sin, though he might have said so correctly ; but he preferred to say " iniquities " and " sins," because in that one sin which passed upon all men, and which was so great that human nature was by it made subject to inevitable death, many sins, as I showed above, may be discriminated ; and further, because there are other sins of the immediate parents, which, though they have not the same effect in producing a change of nature, yet subject the children to guilt unless the divine grace and mercy interpose to rescue them. Chap, xlvii.— /^ is difficult to decide whether the sins of a man's other progenitors are imputed to him. But about the sins of the other progenitors who intervene between Adam and a man's own parents, a question may very well be raised. Whether every one who is born is involved in all their accumulated evil acts, in all their multiplied original guilt, so that the later he is born, so much the worse is his condition ; or whether God threatens to visit the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generations, because in His mercy He does not extend His wrath against the sins of the progenitors further than that, lest those who do not obtain the grace of regeneration might be crushed down under too heavy a burthen if they were com- pelled to bear as original guilt all the sins of all their progeni- tors from the very beginning of the human race, and to pay the penalty due to them ; or whether any other solution of this great question may or may not be found in Scripture by a more diligent search and a more careful interpretation, I dare not rashly affirm. ^ Ezek. xviii. 2, * Ps. li. 5 (The A. V. has the singular, " inir[uity " and "sin "). ENCHIR. O 210 THE ENCniKIDION. [CHAP. XLVIII. Chap, xlviii. — 7V/c f/nilt of the first sin is so great that it can be washed away only in the blood of the Mediator, Jesus Christ. Nevertheless, that one sin, admitted into a place where such perfect happiness reigned, was of so heinous a character, that in one man the whole human race was originally, and as one may say, radically, condemned ; and it cannot be pardoned and blotted out except through the one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who only has luid power to be so born as not to need a second birth. Chap. xlix. — Christ icas not regenerated in the baptism of John, but submitted to it to give us an example of humility, just as lie submitted to death, not as the punishment of sin, but to take away the sin of the world. Now, those who were baptized in the baptism of John, by whom Christ was Himself baptized,^ were not regenerated ; but they were prepared through the ministry of Ijis fore- runner, who cried, "Prepare ye the way of the Lord,"^ for Him in whom only they could be regenerated. For His baptism is not with water only, as was that of John, but with the Holy Ghost also;^ so that whoever believes in Christ is regenerated by that Spirit, of whom Clirist being generated, He did not need regeneration. Whence that announcement of the Father which was heard after His baptism, " This day have I begotten Thee,"^ referred not to that one day of time on which He was baptized, but to the one day of an unchangeable eternity, so as to show that this man was one in person with the Only-begotten. For when a day neither begins with the close of yesterday, nor ends with the beginning of to-morrow, it is an eternal to-day. Therefore He asked to be baptized in water by John, not that any iniquity of His might be washed away, but that He miglit manifest the depth of His humility. fPor baptism found in Him nothing to wash away, as death found in Him notliing to punisli ; so that it was in the strictest justice, and not by the mere violence of power, that the devil was crushed and conquered : for, as he had most unjustly put Christ to death, though there was no sin in Him to deserve death, it was most just that through Christ he ' Matt. iii. 13-15. 'Matt. iii. 3. Mlatt. iii. 11. * I's. ii. 7 ; Hfb. i. 5, v. 5. It is by a mistake that Augiistine quotes tlicso M'ords aa pronounced at our Lord's baptism. CHAP. LIL] CHRIST TAKES AWAY SIX. 211 should lose his hold of those who by sin were justly subject to the bondage in which he held them. Both of these, then, that is, both baptism and death, were submitted to by Him, not through a pitiable necessity, but of His own free pity for us, and as part of an arrangement by which, as one man brought sin into the world, that is, upon the whole human race, so one man was to take away the sin of the world. Chap. l. — Christ took away not only the one original sin, hut all the other sins that have been added to it. With this difference: the lirst man brought one sin into the world, but this man took away not only that one sin, but all that He found added to it. Hence the apostle says : " And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift : for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification."^ Tor it is evident that the one sin which we bring with us by nature would, even if it stood alone, bring us under condemnation ; but the free gift justifies man from many offences : for each man, in addition to the one sin which, in common with all his kind, he brings with him by nature, has committed many sins that are strictly his own. CuAP. LI. — All men horn of Adam are under condemnation, and only ifneio horn in Christ are freed from condemnation. But what he says a little after, "Therefore, as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life,"^ shows clearly enough that there is no one born of Adam but is subject to condemnation, and that no one, unless he be new born in Christ, is freed from condemnation. Chap. lii. — In baptism, lohich is the similitude of the death and resurrection of Christ, all, both infants and adults, die to sin that they may icalk in neic- ness of life. And after he has said as much about the condemnation through one man, and the free gift through one man, as he deemed sufficient for that part of his epistle, the apostle goes on to speak of the great mystery of holy baptism in the cross of Christ, and to clearly explain to us tliat baptism in Christ 1 Rom. V. IG. 2Uo]u. v. 18. 212 THE ENCHIRIDION. [cnAP. LII. is nothing else than a similitude of the death of Christ, and that the death of Christ on the cross is nothing but a similitude of the pardon of sin : so that just as real as is His death, so real is the remission of our sins ; and just as real as is His resun-ection, so real is our justification. He says : " What shall we say, then ? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?"^ For he had said previously, "But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound."^ And therefore he proposes to himself the question, whether it would be right to continue in sin for the sake of the consequent abounding grace. But he answers, " God forbid ; " and adds, " How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein ? '* Then, to show that we are dead to sin, " Know ye not," he says, " that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into His death ? " If, then, the fact that we were baptized into the death of Christ proves that we are dead to sin, it follows that even infants who are baptized into Christ die to sin, being baptized into His death. For there is no exception made : " So many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into His death." And this is said to prove that we are dead to sin. Now, to what sin do infants die in their regeneration but that sin which they bring with them at birth ? And therefore to these also applies what follows : " Therefore we are buried with Him by baptism into death ; that, like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death, we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrec- tion : knowing this, that our old man is crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin. Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him : knowing that Christ, being raised from the dead, dieth no more ; death hath no more dominion over Him. For in that He died, He died unto sin once ; but in that He liveth. He liveth unto God. Likewise reckon ye also your- selves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord." Now he had commenced with proving » Rom. vi. 1. - Kom. v. 20. CHAP. LIV.] CHRIST'S LIFE TYPICAL OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE. 213 that we must not continue in sin that grace may abound, and had said : " How shall we that are dead to sin live any longer therein ? " And to show that we are dead to sin, he added : " Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into His death ? " And so he concludes this whole passage just as he began it. For he has brought in the death of Christ in such a way as to imply that Christ Himself also died to sin. To what sin did He die if not to the flesh, in which there was not sin, but the likeness of sin, and which was therefore called by the name of sin ? To those who are baptized into the death of Christ, then, — and this class includes not adults only, but infants as well, — he says : " Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord."^ Chap. liii. — Christ's cross ami burial, resurrection, ascension, and sitting down at the right hand of God, are images of the Christian life. All the events, then, of Christ's crucifixion, of His burial, of His resurrection the third day, of His ascension into heaven, of His sitting down at the right hand of the Father, were so ordered, that the life which the Christian leads here might be modelled upon them, not merely in a mystical sense, but in reality. For in reference to His crucifixion it is said : " They that are Christ's have crucified the flesh, with the affec- tions and lusts." ^ And in reference to His burial : " We are buried with Him by baptism into death." ^ In reference to His resurrection : " That, like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life."* And in reference to His ascension into heaven and sitting down at the right hand of the Father : *' If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those thinc^s which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth. For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God." ^ Chap. liv. — Christ's second coming does not belong to the imst, hut will take place at the end of the loorld. But what we believe as to Christ's action in the future, when He shall come from heaven to judge the quick and tlie dead, ^ Eom. vi. 1-11. 2 Gal. v. 24. 3 p^on^. ^i 4, 4 Eom. vL 5. « Col. iii. 1-3. 214 THE ENCIIirJDION. [CHAP. LV. has no bearing upon the life which we now lead here ; for it forms no part of what He did upon eartli, hut is part of what He shall do at the end of tlie world. And it is to this that the apostle refers in what immediately follows the passage quoted above : " When Clirist, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with Him in glory." ^ Cii.vr. LV. — The expression, ** Clirist shall judge the quick and the dead" may le understood in either of two senses. Now the expression, " to judge the quick and the dead," may be interpreted in two ways : either we may understand by the " quick " those who at His advent shall not yet have died, but whom He shall find alive in the flesh, and by the " dead " those who have departed from the body, or who shall have departed before His coming ; or we may understand the " quick " to mean the righteous, and the " dead " the un- righteous ; for the righteous shall be judged as well as others. Now the judgment of God is sometimes taken in a bad sense, as, for example, " They that have done evil unto the resurrec- tion of judgment ;"^ sometimes in a good sense, as, "Save me, God, by Thy name, and judge me by Thy strength."'"^ This is easily understood when we consider that it is the judgment of God which separates the good from the evil, and sets the good at His right hand, that they may be delivered from evil, and not destroyed with the wicked ; and it is for this reason that the Psalmist cried, " Judge me, God," and then added, as if in explanation, " and distinguish my cause from that of an ungodly nation."* CuAP. L\i. — Thc Holy Spirit and (he Churclu The Church is the temple of God. And now, having spoken of Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, our Lord, with the brevity suitable to a confession of our faith, wo go on to say that we believe also in the Holy Gliost, — thus completing the Trinity which constitutes the Godhead. Then we mention the Holy Church. And thus we are made to understand that tlie intelligent creation, which constitutes the free Jerusalem,^ ouglit to be subordinate in the order of > Col. iii 4. 2 John v. 29 {damnation, A. V.). ' Ps. liv. 1. * Ps. xliii. 1 (" Plead my cause against au ungodly nation," A.V.). ^' Gal. iv. 26. CHAP. LYI.] THE HOLY SPIRIT. 215 speech to the Creator, the Supreme Trinity : for all that is said of the man Christ Jesus has reference, of course, to the unity of the person of the Only-begotten. Therefore the true order of the Creed demanded that the Church should be made subordinate to the Trinity, as the house to Him who dwells in it, the temple to God who occupies it, and the city to its builder. And we are here to understand the whole Church, not that part of it only which wanders as a stranger on the earth, praising the name of God from the rising of the sun to the s^oinsj down of the same, and sin^inc^ a new sonoj of deliverance from its old captivity ; but that part also which has always from its creation remained stedfast to God in heaven, and has never experienced the misery consequent upon a fall. This jpart is_nmde_iip .of the holy angels, who enjoy uninterrupted happiness ; and (as it is bound to do) it renders assistance to the part which is stiU wandering among strangers : for these two parts shall be one in the fellowsliip of eternity, and now they are one in the bonds of love, the whole having been ordained for the worship of the one God. Wherefore, neither the whole Church, nor any part of it, has any desire to be worshipped instead of God, nor to be God to any one who belongs to the temple of God — that temple which is built up of the saints who were created by the uncreated God. And therefore the Holy Spirit, if a creature, could not be the Creator, but would be a part of the intelligent creation. He would simply be the highest creature, and therefore would not be mentioned in the Creed before the Church ; for He Himself would belong to the Church, to that part of it which is in the heavens. And He would not have a temple, for He Himself would be part of a temple. JSTow He has a temple, of which the apostle says : " Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, which is in you, which ye have of God V'^ Of which body he says in another place : " Know ye not that your bodies are the mem- bers of Christ ? "^ How, then, is He not God, seeing that He has a temple ? and how can He be less than Christ, whose members are His temple ? Nor has He one temple, and God another, seeing that the same apostle sa3's : " Know ye not 1 1 Cor. vi. 19. 2 1 Cor. vi. 15. 216 THE ENCIIiniDION. [CIIAP. LVII. that ye are the temple of God?"^ and adds, as proof of this, "and that the Spirit of God dwclleth in you."^ God, then, dwells in His temple : not the Holy Spirit only, but the Fatlier also, and the Son, who says of His own body, through which He was made Head of the Church upon earth (" that in aU things He might liave the pre-eminence"^): "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.'"* The temple of God, then, that is, of the Supreme Trinity as a whole, is the Holy Church, embracing in its full extent both heaven and earth. Chap. lvii. — The condition of the Church In heaven. But of that part of the Church which is in heaven what can we say, except that no wicked one is found in it, and that no one has fallen from it, or shall ever fall from it, since the time that " God spared not the angels that sinned," as the Apostle Peter writes "but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment"?^ Chap, lviii. — We have no certain knowledge of the organization of the angelic society. i^ow, what the organization is of that supremely happy society in heaven: what the differences of rank are, which explain the fact that while all are called by the general name angels, as we read in the Epistle to the Hebrews, " But to which of the angels said God at any time. Sit on my riglit hand ? "^ (this form of expression being evidently designed to embrace all the angels without exception), we yet find that there are some called archangels ; and whether the archangels are the same as those called liosts, so that the expression, " Praise ye Him, all His angels : praise ye Him, all His hosts,"' is the same as if it had been said, " Praise ye Him, all His angels : praise ye Him, all His archangels ; " and what are the various significations of those four names under which the apostle seems to embrace the whole heavenly company with- out exception, "whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers : " ^ — let those who are able answer ^ 1 Cor. iii. IC. » 1 Cor. iii. IG. 3 Col. i. 18. •• John ii. 19. » 2 Tct. ii. 4. ileb. i. 13. ? Pa. cxlviii. 2. » Col. L 16. CHAP. LX.] THE ANGELS. 217 these questions, if they can also prove their answers to be 'true ; but as for me, I confess my ignorance. I am not even certain upon this point : whether the sun, and the moon, and all the stars, do not form part of this same society, though many consider them merely luminous bodies, without either sensation or intelligence. Chap. lix. — llie bodies assumed hy angels raise a very difficult, and not very useful, subject of discussion. Further, who will tell with what sort of bodies it was that the angels appeared to men, making themselves not only visible, but tangible ; and again, how it is that, not through ^ material bodies, but b}^ spiritual power, they present visions not to the bodily eyes, but to the spiritual eyes of the mind, or speak something not into the ear from without, but from within the soul of the man, they themselves being stationed there too, as it is written in the prophet, " And the angel that spake in me said unto me " ^ (he does not say, " that spake to me," but " that spake in me ") ; or appear to men in sleep, and make communications through dreams, as we read in the Gospel, " Behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying " ? ^ For these methods of communi- cation seem to imply that the angels have not tangible bodies, and make it a very difficult question to solve how the patriarchs washed their feet;^ and how it was that Jacob wrestled with the angel in a way so unmistakeably material.^ To ask questions like tliese, and to make such guesses as we can at the answers, is a useful exercise for the intellect, if the discussion be kept witliin proper bounds, and if we / avoid the error of supposing ourselves to know what we do not know. For what is the necessity for affirming, or denying, or defining with accuracy on these subjects, and others like them, when we may without blame be entirely ignorant of them ? Chap. LX.—It is more necessary to be able to detect the wiles of Satan tvhen he transforms himself into an angel of light. It is more necessary to use all our powers of discrimination and judgment when Satan transforms himself into an angel of » Zech. i. 9 (" The angel that talked tvith me," A.Y.). 8 Matt. i. 20. 3 Qen. xviii. 4, xix. 2. "» Gcii. xxxii. 21, 25. 218 THE ENCHIRIDIOX. [CRAP. LXI. light/ lest by liis wiles he should lead us astray into huitful courses. For, while he only deceives the bodily senses, and does not pervert the mind from that true and sound judgment which enables a man to lead a life of faith, there is no danger to religion ; or if, feigning himself to be good, he does or says the things that befit good angels, and we believe him to be good, the error is not one that is hurtful or dangerous to Christian faith. But when, through these means, which are alien to his nature, he goes on to lead us into courses of his own, then great watchfulness is necessary to detect, and refuse to follow, him. But how many men are fit to evade all his deadly wiles, unless God restrains and watches over them ? The very difficulty of the matter, however, is useful in this respect, that it prevents men from trusting in them- selves or in one another, and leads all to place their confidence in God alone. And certainly no pious man can doubt that this is most expedient for us. Chap. lxi. — The Church on earth has hecn redeemed from slu hy the blood of a Mediator. Tliis part of the Church, then, wliich is made up of the holy angels and the hosts of God, shall become known to us in its true nature, when, at the end of the world, we shall be united with it in the common possession of everlasting happi- ness. But the other part, which, separated from it, wandere as a stranger on the earth, is better known to us, both because we belong to it, and because it is composed of men, and we too are men. This section of the Church has been redeemed from all sin by the blood of a ^Mediator who had no sin, and its song is : " If God be for us, who can be against us ? He that sjjared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all." ^ Xqw it was not for the angels that Christ died. ' Yet what was done for the redemption of man through His death was in a sense done for the angels, because the enmity which sin had put between men and the holy angels is removed, and friendship is restored between them, and by the redemption of man the gaps M'hich the great apostasy left in the angelic host are filled up. '2 Cor. xi. 11. 'Kom. viii. Gl. CHAP. LXIIL] redemption AND THE ANGELS. 219 Chap. lxii. — By the sacrifce of Clirlst all tJungs are restoral, and peace is made between eo,rth and heaven. And, of course, the holy angels, taught by God, in the eternal contemplation of whose truth their hai^piness consists, know how great a number of the human race are to supple- ment their ranks, and fill up the full tale of their citizenship. Wherefore the apostle says, that " all things are gathered to- gether in one in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth." -^ The things which are in heaven are gathered together when what was lost therefrom in the fall of the angels is restored from among men ; and the things which are on earth are gathered together, when those who are predes- tined to eternal life are redeemed from their old corruption. /| And thus, through that single sacrifice in which the Mediator was offered up, the one sacrifice of which the many victims under the law were types, heavenly things^ are brought into peace with earthly things, and earthly things with heavenly. Wherefore, as the same apostle says : " For it pleased the Father that in Him should all fulness dwell : and, having made peace through the blood of His cross, by Him to recon- cile all things to Himself : by Him, I say, whether they be thinc^s in earth or thin2js in heaven."^ CiiAP. LXiii. — The peace of God, tohich reigneth in heaven, passeth all understanding. This peace, as Scripture saith, " passeth all understanding," ^ and cannot be known by us until we have come into the full possession of it. For in what sense are heavenly things reconciled, except they be reconciled to us, viz. by coming into harmony with us ? For in heaven there is unbroken peace, both between all the intelligent creatures that exist there, and between these and tlieir Creator. And this peace, as is said, passeth all understanding ; but this, of course, means our understanding, not that of those' who always behold the face of their Father. We now, however great may be our human understanding, know but in part, and see through a glass darkly.^ But when we shall be equal unto the angels of God,^ then we shall see face to face, as they do ; and we 1 Eph. i. 10. 2<-,)] i 19^ 20. 3 pi^n. iv. 7. ^ 1 Cor. xiii. 12. -' Luke xx. 3G. ^ 220 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. LXIV. shall have as great peace towards them as they have towards us, because we shall love them as much as we are loved by them. And so tlieir peace shall be known to us : for our own peace shall be like to theirs, and as great as theirs, nor shall it then pass our understanding. But the peace of God, the peace wliich He cherisheth towards us, shall undoubtedly pass not our understanding only, but theirs as well. And this must be so : for every rational creature which is hai>py de- rives its happiness from Him ; He does not derive His from it. And in this view it is better to interpret " all " in the passage, "The peace of God passeth all understanding," as admitting of no exception even in favour of the understanding of the holy angels : the only exception that can be made is that of God Himself For, of course, His peace does not pass His own understanding. CiiAr. LXIV. — Pardon of sin extends over the whole mortal life of the saints, which,^ though free from crime, is not free from sin. But the angels even now are at peace with us when our sins are pardoned. Hence, in the order of the Creed, after the mention of the Holy Church is placed the remission of sins. For it is by this that the Church on earth stands : it is through this that what had been lost, and was found, is saved from being lost again. For, setting aside the grace of bap^tismj which is jriven as an antidote to orin;inal sin, so that what our birth imposes upon us, our new birth relieves us from (this grace, however, takes away all the actual sins also that have been committed in thought, word, and deed) : setting aside, then, this great act of favour, whence commences man's restoration, and in which all our guilt, both original and actual, is washed away, the rest of our life from tlie time that we have the use of reason provides constant occasion for the remission of sins, however great may be our advance in ritihteousness. For the sons of God, as loni^ as tliev live in this body of death, are in conflict with death. And although it is truly said of them, " As many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God,"^ yet tliey are led by the Spirit of God, and as the sons of God advance towards God under this drawback, that tliey are led also by their own spirit, ' liom. viiL H. CHAP. LXVL] penitence AND PAPDON. 221 weighted as it is by the corruptible body;^ and that, as the sons of men, under the influence of human affections, they fall back to their old level, and so sin. There is a difference, however. For although every crime is a sin, every sin is not a crime. And so we say that the life of holy men, as long as they remain in this mortal body, may be found without crime ; but, as the Apostle John says, " If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us."^ Chap. lxv. — God pardons sins, hut on condition of penitence, certain times for tvhich have been fixed by the law of the Church. But even crimes themselves, however great, may be remitted in the Holy Church ; and the mercy of God is never to be despaired of by men who truly repent, each according to the measure of his sin. And in the act of repentance, where a crime has been committed of such a nature as to cut off the sinner from the body of Christ, we are not to take account so ^ much of the measure of time as of the measure of sorrow ; for a broken and a contrite heart God doth not despise.^ But as the grief of one heart is frequently hid from another, and is not made known to others by words or other signs, when it is manifest to Him of whom it is said, " My groaning is not hid from Thee,"* those who govern the Church have rightly O appointed times of penitence, that the Church in which the sins are remitted may be satisfied ; and_ outside the Church sins are not remitted. For the Church alone has received the pledge of the Holy Spirit, without which there is no remission of sins — such, at least, as brings the pardoned to eternal life. Chap. lxvi. — The pardon of sin has reference chiefly to the future judgment. Now the pardon of sin has reference chiefly to the future judgment. For, as far as this life is concerned, the saying of Scripture holds good : " A heavy yoke is upon the sons of Adam, from the day that they go out of their mother's womb, till the day that they return to the mother of all things." ^ So that we see even infants, after baptism and regeneration, suffering from the infliction of divers evils : and thus we are 1 Wisd. ix. 15. 2 1 John i. 8. ^ Ps. li. 17. * Ps. xxxviii. 9. ^ Ecclus. xl. 1. 222 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. LXVII. given to understand, that all that is set forth in the sacra- ments of salvation refers rather to the hope of future good, than to the retaining or attaining of present blessings. For many sins seem in this world to be overlooked and visited with no punishment, whose punishment is reserved for the future (for it is not in vain that the day when Christ shall come as Judge of quick and dead is peculiarly named the day of judgment) ; just as, on the other hand, many sins are punished in this life, wdiich nevertheless are pardoned, and shall bring down no punishment in the future life. Accord- ingly, in reference to certain temporal punishments, which in this life are visited upon sinners, the apostle, addressing those whose sins are blotted out, and not reserved for the final judg- ment, says : " For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, w^e ate chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world." ^ Chap. hx\u.— Faith lulthout worTcs is dead, and cannot save a man. It is believed, moreover, by some, that men who do not abandon the name of Christ, and who have been baptized in the Church by His baptism, and who have never been cut off from the Church by any schism or heresy, though they should live in the grossest sin, and never either wash it away in penitence nor redeem it by almsgiving, but persevere in it persistently to the last day of their lives, shall be saved by fire ; that is, that although they shall suffer a punishment by fire, lasting for a time proportionate to the magnitude of their crimes and misdeeds, they shall not be punished with ever- lasting fire. But those who believe this, and yet are Catholics, seem to me to be led astray by a kind of benevolent feeling natural to humanity. For Holy Scripture, when consulted, gives a very different answer. I have written a book on thi* _subject, entitled 0/ Faith and Works, in which, to the best of my ability, God assisting me, I have shown from Scripture, Jhat the faith which saves us is that which the Apostle Paul clearly enough describes when he says : " For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by love." ^ But if it worketh evil, and 1 1 Cor. xi. 31, 32. ' GaL v. G. CHAP. LXVIIL] saved BY FIEE. 223 not good, then without doubt, as the Apostle James says, " it is dead, being alone." ^ The same apostle says again, " What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works ? Can faith save him ? " ^ And further, if a wicked man shall be saved by fire on account of his faith alone, and if this is what the blessed Apostle Paul means when he says, " But he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire ;" ^ then faith without works can save a man, and what his fellow-apostle James says must be false. And that must be false which Paul himself says in another place : " Be not deceived : neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extor- tioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."* For if those who persevere in these wicked courses shall nevertheless be saved on account of their faith in Christ, how can it be true that they shall not inherit the kingdom of God ? Chap, lxviii. — The true sense of the passage (1 Cor. iii. 11-15) about those u'ho are saved, yet so as hy fire. But as these most plain and unmistakeable declarations of the apostles cannot be false, that obscure saying about those who build upon the foundation, Christ, not gold, silver, and precious stones, but wood, hay, and stubble (for it is these who, it is said, shall be saved, yet so as by fire, the merit of the foun- dation saving them^), must be so interpreted as not to conflict with the plain statements quoted above. Now wood, hay, and stubble may, without incongruity, be understood to signify such an attachment to worldly things, however lawful these may be in themselves, that they cannot be lost without grief of mind. And though this grief burns, yet if Christ hold the place of foundation in the heart, — that is, if nothing be pre- ferred to Him, and if the man, thougjh burninsj with ^rrief, is yet more willing to lose the things he loves so much than to lose Christ, — he is saved by fire. If, however, in time of temptation, he prefer to hold by temporal and earthly things rather than by Christ, he has not Christ as his foundation ; for he puts earthly things in the first place, and in a building ^ Jas. ii. 17. - Jas. ii. 14. ^1 Cor. iii. 15. * 1 Cor. vi. 9, 10. ^1 Cor. iii. 11-15. 224 THE EXCiiiRiDiox. [chap. lxix. nothing comes before the foundation. Again, the fire of ^vhich the apostle speaks in this place must be such a fire as both men are made to pass through, that is, both the man who builds upon the foundation gold, silver, precious stones, and the man who builds wood, hay, stubble. For he immediately adds : " The fire shall try every man's work, of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss ; but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire."^ The fire then shall prove, not the work of one of them only, but of both. Now the trial of adversity is a kind of fire which is' plainly spoken of in another place : " The furnace proveth the potter's vessels : and the furnace of ad- versity just men." ^ And this fire does in the course of this life act exactly in the way the apostle says. If it come into contact with two believers, one " caring for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord," ^ that is, building upon Christ the foundation, gold, silver, precious stones ; the other " caring for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife,'"* that is, building upon the same foundation wood, hay, stubble, — the work of the former is not burned, because he has not given his love to things whose loss can cause him grief ; but the work of the latter is burned, because things that are enjoyed with desire cannot be lost without pain. But since, by our supposition, even the latter prefers to lose these things rather than to lose Christ, and since he does not desert Christ out of fear of losing them, though he is grieved when he does lose them, he is saved, but it is so as by fire ; because the grief for what he loved and has lost burns him. But it does not subvert nor consume him ; for he is protected 1)y his immoveable and incorruptible toundation. Chat, lxix.— It is not impoMihle that some heUerrrs may pass tJirougJi a ]furgatorial Jire in tfie future life. And it is not impossible that something of the same kind may take place even after tliis life. It is a matter that may be incjuired into, and either ascertained or left doubtful, ' 1 Cor. iii. 13-15. ' Ecclus. xxvii. 5, ii. 5. * 1 Cor. vii. 32. * 1 Cor. viL 33. CHAP, lxxl] purgatory. 225 whether some believers shall pass through a kind of purga- torial fire, and in proportion as they have loved with more or less devotion the goods that perish, be less or more quickly delivered from it. This cannot, however, be the case of any of those of whom it is said, that they " shall not inherit the kingdom of God," ^ unless after suitable repentance their sins be forgiven them. When I say "suitable," I mean that they are not to be unfruitful in almsgiving; for Holy Scripture lays so much stress on this virtue, that our Lord tells us beforehand, that He will ascribe no merit to those on His right hand but that they abound in it, and no defect to those on His left hand but their want of it, when He shall say to the former, " Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom," and to the latter, " Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire." 2 IP Chap. lxx. — Almsgiving loill not atone for sin unless the life he changed. We must beware, however, lest any one should suppose that gross sins, such as are committed by those who shall not inherit the kingdom of God, may be daily perpetrated, and daily atoned for by^ almsgiving. The life must be changed for the better ; and almsgiving must be used to propitiate God for past sins, not to purchase impunity for the commission of such sins in the future. For He has given no man licence to sin,^ although in His mercy He may blot out sins that are already committed, if we do not neglect to make proper satis- faction. /^ Chap. lxxi. — The daily prayer of the believer malces satisfaction for the trivial sins that daily stain his life. Now the daily prayer of the believer makes satisfaction for those daily sins of a momentary and trivial kind which are necessary incidents of this life. For he can say, " Our Father which art in heaven," * seeing that to such a Father he is now born again of water and of the Spirit.^ And this prayer certainly takes away the very small sins of daily life. It takes away also those which at one time made the life of the believer very wicked, but which, now that he is changed for » 1 Cor. vi. 10. 2 Matt. xxv. 31-4G. 3 Eccliis. xv. 20. * Matt. vi. 9. ^ Jolm iii. 5. ENCIIIR. P t 22G THE ENCHIRIDinX. [CIIAP. LXXII. the better by repentance, he has given up, provided that as truly as he says, " Forgive us our debts " (for there is no want of debts to be forgiven), so tinily does he say, " as we forgive our debtors ; " * that is, provided he does what he says he does : for to forgive a man who asks for pardon, is really to give alms. Chap, lxxii. — There are many kinds of alms, the giving of which assists to procure pardon for our sins. And on this principle of interpretation, our Lord's saying, " Give alms of such things as ye have, and, behold, all things are clean unto you," ^ applies to every useful act that a man does in mercy. Xot only, then, the man who gives food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty, clothing to the naked, hospitality to the stranger, shelter to the fugitive, who visits the sick and the imprisoned, ransoms the captive, assists the weak, leads the blind, comforts the sorrowful, heals the sick, puts the wanderer on the right path, gives advice to the per- plexed, and supplies the wants of the needy, — not this man only, but the man who pardons the sinner also gives alms ; and the man who corrects with blows, or restrains by any kind of discipline one over whom he has power, and who at the same time forgives from the heart the sin by which he was injured, or prays that it may be forgiven, is also a giver of alms, not only in that he forgives, or prays for forgiveness for the sin, but also in that he rebukes and corrects the sinner : for in this too he shows mercy. Now much good is bestowed upon unwilling recipients, when their advantage and not their pleasure is consulted ; and they themselves frequently prove to be their own enemies, while their true friends are those whom they take for their enemies, and to whom in their blindness they return evil for good. (A Christian, indeed, is not permitted to return evil even for evil,^) And thus there are many kinds of alms, by giving of which we assist to procure the pardon of our sins. Chap, lxxii i. — The greatest of all alms is to forgive our debtors and to love our cneinics. But none of those is greater than to forgive from the heart a sin that has been committed against us. For it is a com- « Matt. \i. 12. ' Luke xi. 11. ^ Eom. xii. 17 ; Matt. v. 44. CHAP. LXXIV.] FORGIVINGNESS A CONDITION OF FOP.GIVENESS. 227 paratively small thing to wish well to, or even to do good to, a man who has done no evil to you. It is a much higher thing, and is the result of the most exalted goodness, to love your enemy, and always to wish well to, and when you have the opportunity, to do good to, the man who wishes you ill, and, when he can, does you harm. This is to obey the com- mand of God : " Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which persecute you." ^ But seeing that this is a frame of mind only reached by the perfect sons of God, and that though every believer ought to strive after it, and by prayer to God and earnest struggling wdth himself endeavour to bring his soul up to this standard, yet a degree of goodness so high can hardly belong to so great a multitude as we believe are heard when they use this petition, " Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors ; " in view of all this, it cannot be doubted that the implied undertaking is fulfilled if a man, though he has not yet attained to loving his enemy, 3'et, when asked by one w^ho has sinned against him to forgive him his sin, does forgive him from his heart. For he certainly desires to be himself forgiven when he prays, '' as w^e forgive our debtors," that is, Forgive us our debts when we beg forgiveness, as we forgive our debtors when they beg forgive- ness from us. Chap, lxxiv. — God does not pardon the sins of those iclio do not from the heart forf/ive others. JSTow, he who asks forgiveness of the man against whom he has sinned, being moved by his sin to ask forgiveness, cannot be counted an enemy in such a sense that it should be as difficult to love him now as it was when he was engaged in active hostility. And the man who does not from his heart forgive him who repents of his sin, and asks forgiveness, need not suppose that his own sins are forgiven of God. For the Truth cannot lie. And what reader or hearer of the Gospel can have failed to notice, that the same person who said, " I am the Truth," ^ taught us also this form of prayer; and in order to impress this particular petition deeply upon our minds, said, " For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you ; but if ye forgive not 1 Matt. V. 4'1. ' John .\iv. 6. 228 THE ENCHIRIDIONS [CIIAP. LXXV. men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses " ? ^ The man whom the thunder of tliis warning does not awaken is not asleep, but dead ; and yet so powerful is tliat voice, tliat it can awaken even the dead. Chap. lxxv. — The wicked and tlie xtnhdieving are not made clean by the givinf/ of alms, except they be born ajain. Assuredly, then, those who live in gross wickedness, and take no care to reform their lives and manners, and yet amid all their crimes and vices do not cease to give frequent alms, in vain take comfort to themselves from the saying of our Lord : " Give alms of such things as ye have ; and, behold, all things are clean unto you."^ For they do not understand how far this saying reaches. But that they may understand this, let them hear what He says. For we read in the Gospel as follows : " And as He spake, a certain Pharisee besought Him to dine with him ; and He went in, and sat down to meat. And when the Pharisee saw it, he marvelled that He had not first washed before dinner. And the Lord said unto him, Now do ye Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and the platter ; but your inward .part is full of ravening and wickedness. Ye fools, did not he that made that which is without, make that which is within also ? But rather give alms of such things as ye have ; and, behold, all things are clean unto you.""^ Are we to understand this as meaning that to the Pharisees who have not the faith of Christ all things are clean, if only they give alms in the way these men count almsgiving, even though they have never believed in Christ, nor been born again of water and of the Spirit ? But the fact is, that all are unclean who are not made clean by the laith of Christ, according to the expression, " purifying their hearts by faith ; " ^ and that the apostle says, " Unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure ; but even their mind and conscience is defiled."'^ How, then, could all things be clean to the Pharisees, even though they gave alms, if they were not believers ? And how could they be believers if they were not willing to have faith in Christ, and to be born again of His grace ? And yet what they heard is true : » Matt. vi. M, 15. ' T-ukc .\i. 41. ' Luke .\i. 37-11. * Acta XV. 9. ' Tit, I 15. CHAP. LXXYI.] ALMSGIVING. 229 " Give alms of such things as ye have ; and, behold, all things are clean unto you." Chap, lxxvi. — To give alms aright, we sJiould begin with ourselves, and have pity upon our oivn souls. For the man who wishes to give alms as he ought, should begin with himself, and give to himself first. For almsgiving is a work of mercy ; and most truly is it said, " To have mercy on thy soul is pleasing to God." ^ And for this end are we born again, that we should be pleasing to God, who is justly displeased with that which we brought with us when we were born. This is our Jirst alms, which we give to our- selves when, through the mercy of a pitying God, we find that -—we are ourselves wretched, and conless the justice of His judg- ment by which we are made wretched, of which the apostle says, " The judgment was by one to condemnation ; " ^ and praise the greatness of His love, of which the same preacher of grace says, " God commendeth His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us : " ^ and thus, judging truly of our own misery, and loving God with the love which He has Himself bestowed, we lead a holy and virtuous life. But the Pharisees, while they gave as alms the tithe of ^^1 their fruits, even the most insignificant, passed over judg- ment and the love of God, and so did not commence their almsgiving at home, and extend their pity to themselves in the first instance. And it is in reference to this order of love that it is said, "Love thy neighbour as thyself."^ When, then, our Lord had rebuked them because they made them- selves clean on the outside, but within were full of ravening and wickedness. He advised them, in the exercise of that charity which each man owes to himself in the first instance, to make clean the inward parts. " But rather," He says, " give alnis of such things as ye have ; and, behold, all things are clean unto you."^ Then, to show what it was that He advised, and what they took no pains to do, and to show that He did not overlook or forget their almsgiving, "But woe unto you, Pharisees ! " ^ He says ; as if He meant to say : I indeed advise you to give alms which shall make all tilings clean ' Ecclus. XXX. 24. 2 -Ro^ y. IQ. 2 p^om. v. 8. * Luke X. 27. * Lulve xi. 42. 230 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. LXXVII. unto you ; " but woe unto you ! for ye tithe mint, and rue, and all manner of herbs ; " as if He meant to say : I know these alms of yours, and ye need not think that I am now admonish- ing you in respect of such things ; " and pass over judgment and the love of God," an alms by which ye might have been made clean from all inward impurity, so that even the bodies which ye are now washing would have been clean to you. For this is the import of " all things," both inward and outward things, as we read* in another place : " Cleanse first that which is within, that the outside may be clean also."^ But lest He might appear to despise the alms which they were giving out of the fruits of the earth, He says : " These ought ye to have done," referring to judgment and the love of God, " and not to leave the other undone," referring to the giving of the tithes. CliAP. LXXVII. — If v:e xcoxdd qxw alms to ourselves, we mustjlee iniquity ; for he who loveth iniquity hateOi his soul. f,'^J_^-rX^'\ Those, then, who think that they can by giving alms, how- ever profuse, whether in money or in kind, purchase for them- selves the privilege of persisting with impunity in their monstrous crimes and hideous vices, need not thus deceive themselves. For not only do they commit these sins, but they love them so mucli that they w^ould like to go on for ever committing them, if only they could do so with impunity. Now, he who loveth iniquity hateth his own soul ; "^ and he who hateth his own soul is not merciful but cruel towards it. For in loving it according to the world, he hateth it according to God. But if lie desired to give alms to it which slioukl make all things clean unto him, he would hate it according to the world, and love it according to God. Xow no one gives alms unless he receive what he gives from one .who is not in want of it. Therefore it is said, " His mercy shall prevent me." ^ Chat, lxxviii. — W/iat sins are trivial and what heinous is a matter /or Qod's judgment. Now, what sins are trivial and what heinous is not a matter to be decided by man's judgment, but by the judgment » Mult, xxiii. 36. " Ps. xi. 5 (•' Him that loveth vioknce, His (God's) soul hateth," A.V.). » Ts. Ux. 10. CHAP. LXXVIIL] relative MAGNITUDE OF SINS. 231 of God. For it is plain that the apostles themselves have given an indulgence in the case of certain sins : take, for ex- ample, what the Apostle Paul says to those who are married : " Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer : and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency."^ Now it is possible that it might not have been considered a sin to have intercourse with a spouse, not with a view to the procreation of children, which is the great blessing of marriage, but for the sake of carnal pleasure, and to save the incontinent from being led by their weakness into the deadly sin of fornication, or adultery, or another form of uncleanness which it is shameful even to name, and into which it is possible that they might be drawn by lust under the temptation of Satan. It is possible, I say, that this might not have been considered a sin, had the apostle not added : " But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment."^ Who, then, can deny that it is a sin, when confessedly it is only by apostolic authority that permission is granted to those who do it ? Another case of the same kind is where he says : " Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints ?"^ And shortly afterwards : " If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the Church. I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you ? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren ? But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers."* Now it might have been supposed in this case that it is not a sin to have a quarrel with another, that the only sin is in wishing to have it adjudicated upon outside the Church, had not the apostle immediately added : " Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law with one another."^ And lest any one should excuse himself by saying that he had a just cause, and was suffering wrong, and that he only wished the sentence of the judges to remove his wrong, the apostle immediately anticipates such thoughts and excuses, and says : > 1 Cor. vii. 5. 2 1 Cor. vii. 6. ^ 1 Cor. vi. 1. * 1 Cor. vi. 4-6. ^ 1 Cor. vi. 7. 232 THE ENCTTTRTDION. [CHAP. LXXIX. "Why do ye not ratlier take wrong? AVhy do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded ? " Tlius bringing us back to our Lord's saying, " If any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also ; "^ and again, " Of him that taketh away thy goods, ask them not again." ^ Tlierefore our Lord has forbidden His followers to go to law with other men about worldly affairs. And carry- ing out this principle, the apostle here declares that to do so is " altogether a fault." But when, notwithstanding, he grants his permission to have such cases between brethren decided in the Church, other brethren adjudicating, and only sternly forbids them to be carried outside the Church, it is manifest that here again an indulgence is extended to the infirmities of the weak. It is in view, then, of these sins, and others of the same sort, and of others again more trifling still, which consist of offences in words and thought (as the Apostle James confesses, "In many things we offend all"^), that we need to pray every day and often to the Lord, saying, " Forgive us our debts," and to add in truth and sincerity, " as we forgive our debtors." Chap, lxxix. — Sins wIlIcIi appear very tri/l'uig, are sometimes in reality very serious. Again, there are some sins which would be considered very trifling, if the Scriptures did not show that they are really very serious. For who would suppose that the man who says to his brother, " Thou fool," is in danger of heU-fire, did not He who is the truth say so ? To the wound, however. He immediately applies the cure, giving a rule for reconciliation with one's offended brother : " Therefore, if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee ; leave there thy gift before the altar, and go tliy way : first bo reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift." * Again, who would suppose that it was so great a sin to. observe days, and months, and times, and years, as those do who are anxious or unwilling to begin any- thing on certain days, or in certain months or years, because the vain doctrines of men lead them to think such times lucky or unlucky, liad we not the means of estimating the greatness • Matt. V. 40. • Luke vi. 30. ' Jas. iii. 2. « Matt. v. 22. 23. CHAP. LXXX.] BLINDING POWER OF CUSTOM. 233 of the evil from the fear expressed by the apostle, who says to such men, " I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain " ? ^ Chap. lxxx. — Sins, however great and detestable, seem trivial when ive are accustomed to them. Add to this, that sins, however great and detestable they may be, are looked upon as trivial, or as not sins at all, when men get accustomed to them ; and so far does this go, that such sins are not only not concealed, but are boasted of, and published far and wide ; and thus, as it is written, " The wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covet- ous, whom the Lord abhorreth." ^ Iniquity of this kind is in Scripture called a cry. You have an instance in the prophet Isaiah, in the case of the evil vineyard : " He looked for judg- ment, but behold oppression ; for righteousness, but behold a cry."^ Whence also the expression in Genesis : " The cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great," ^ because in these cities crimes were not only not punished, but were openly committed, as if under the protection of the law. And so in our own times : many forms of sin, though not just the same as those of Sodom and Gomorrah, are now so openly and habitually practised, that not only dare we not excommunicate a layman, we dare not even degrade a clergyman, for the commission of them. So that when, a few years ago, I was expounding the Epistle to the Galatians, in commenting on that very place where the apostle says, " I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed labour upon you in vain," I was compelled to exclaim, " Woe to the sins of men ! for it is only when we are not accustomed to them that we shrink from them : when once we are accustomed to them, though the blood of the Son of God was poured out to wash them away, though they are so great that the kingdom of God is wholly shut against them, constant familiarity leads to the toleration of them all, and habitual toleration leads to the practice of many of them. And grant, Lord, that we may not come to practise all that we have not the power to hinder." But I shall see whether the extravagance of grief did not betray me into rashness of speech. » Gal. iv. 10, 11. 2 Ps, X. 3. ^ Isa. v. 7. * Gen. xviii. 20. 234 ' THE ENcniRiDiON. [chap, lxxxi. \- CiiAi". LXXXI. — There are two muses ofsiu, ifjnoi'ance and weakness ; and we need divine help to overcome both. i I shall now say this, which I have often said before in / other places of my works. There are two causes that lead J to sin : either we do not yet know our duty, or we do not perform the duty that we know. The former is the sin of ignorance, the latter of weakness. Now against these^rts ~ our duty to struggle ; but we shall certainly be beaten in the fight, unless we are helped by God, not only to see our duty, but also, when we clearly see it, to make the love of righteousness stronger in us than the love of earthly things, the eager longing after which, or the fear of losing which, leads us with our eyes open into known sin. In the latter case we are not only sinners, for we are so even when we err through ignorance, but we are also transgressors of the law ; for we leave undone what we know we ought to do, and we do what we know we ought not to do. Wherefore not only ought we to pray for pardon when we have sinned, saying, " Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors ;" but we ought to pray for guidance, that we may be kept from sinning, saying, " and ^ lead us not into temptation." And we are to pray to Him of whom the Psalmist says, " The Lord is my light and my sal- vation :"^ my light, for He removes my ignorance ; my salva- tion, for He takes away my infirmity. Chap, lxxxii. — The mercy of God is necessary to true repentance. Now even penance itself, when by the law of the Church there is sulficient reason for its being gone through, is fre- quently evaded through infirmity ; for shame is the fear of losing pleasure when the good opinion of men gives more pleasure than the righteousness which leads a man to humble himself in penitence. Wherefore the mercy of God is neces- sary not only when a man repents, but even to lead him to repent. How else explain what the apostle says of certain persons : " if God peradventure will give them repentance" ?^ And before I'eter wept bitterly, we are told by the evangelist, " The Lord turned, and looked upon him." ^ » 2 Tim. ii. 25. = Luko x.\ii. CI. CHAP. LXXXV.] RESURRECTION OF THE BODY. 235 Chap, lxxxiii. — The man luho defspise.s the mercy of God is guilty of the sin against the Holy Ghost. Now the man who, not believing that sins are remitted in the Church, despises this great gift of God's mercy, and per- sists to the last day of his life in his obstinacy of heart, is guilty of the unpardonable sin against the Holy Ghost, in whom Christ forgives sins.^ But this difficult question I have ' discussed as clearly as I could in a book devoted exclusively to this one point. Chap, lxxxiv. — The resurrection of the body gives rise to numerous questions. Now, as to the resurrection of the body, — not a resurrection such as some have had, who came back to life for a time and died again, but a resurrection to eternal life, as the body of Christ Himself rose again, — I do not see how I can discuss the matter briefly, and at the same time give a satisfactory answer to all the questions that are ordinarily raised about it. Yet that the bodies of all men — both those who have been born and those who shall be born, both those who have died and those who shall die — shall be raised again, no Christian ought to have the shadow of a doubt. Chap, lxxxv. — The case of abortive conceptions. Hence in the first place arises a question about abortive conceptions, which have indeed been born in the mother's womb, but not so born that they could be born again. For if we shall decide that these are to rise again, we cannot object to any conclusion that may be drawn in regard to those which are fully formed. Now who" is there that is not rather disposed to think that unformed abortions perish, like seeds that have never fructified ? But who will dare to deny, though he may not dare to affirm, that at the resurrection every defect in the form shall be supplied, and that thus the perfection which time would have brought shall not be wanting, any more tlian the blemishes which time did bring shall be present : so that tlie nature shall neither want anything suitable and in harmony with it that length of days would have added, nor be debased by the presence of anything of an opposite kind that length » Mittt. xii. 32. 236 THE EXcnirjDiON. [chap, lxxxvi. of days has added ; but that what is not yet complete shall be completed, just as what has been injured shall be renewed. Cjiap. lxxxvi. — Jf they have ever lived, they mu-Ht of course have died, and therefore sJiall have a sJiare in the resurrection of the dead. And tlierofore the following question may be very carefully inquired into and discussed by learned men, tliough I do not know whether it is in man's power to resolve it : At what time the infant begins to live in the womb : whether life exists in a latent form before it manifests itself in the motions of the living being. To deny that the young who are cut out limb by limb from the womb, lest if they were left there dead the mother should die too, have never been alive, seems too audacious. Now^ from the time that a man begins to live, from that time it is possible for him to die. And if he die. wheresoever death may overtake him, I cannot discover on what principle he can be denied an interest in the resurrection of the dead. Chap, lxxxvii. — The case of monstrous hirtJis. "We are not justified in affirming even of monstrosities., which are born and live, however quickly they may die, that they shall not rise again, nor that they shall rise again in their deformity, and not rather with an amended and perfected body. God forbid that the double-limbed man who was lately born in the East, of whom an account was brought by most trustworthy brethren who had seen him, — an account whicli the presbyter Jerome, of blessed memory, left in writing ; ^ — God forbid, I say, that we should think that at the resurrec- tion there shall be one man with double limbs, and not two distinct men, as would have been the case had twins been born. And so other births, which, because they have either a superiluity or a defect, or because they are very much de- formed, are called monstrositus, shall at the resurrection be restored to the normal shape of man ; and so each single soul shall possess its own body ; and no bodies shall coliere together even though they were born in cohesion, but each separately ^ Jerome, in his Epistle to Vitalis: " Or bccnuse in our times a mnn was bom nt Lytltla witli two li«';ul», four liaiub, one belly, auJ two feet, docs it necessarily follow that all men are so born ? " CHAP. LXXXIX.] MATERIAL OF THE BODY RESTORED. 237 shall possess all the members which constitute a complete human body. Chap, lxxxviii.— TAe material of the hochj never perishes. Nor does the earthly material out of which men's mortal bodies are created ever perish ; but though it may crumble into dust and ashes, or be dissolved into vapours and exhala- tions, though it may be transformed into the substance., of other bodies, or dispersed into the elements, though it should become food for beasts or men, and be changed into their flesh, it returns in a moment of time to that human soul which animated it at the first, and which caused it to become man, and to live and grow. Chap, lxxxix. — But this material may he differently arranged in the resurrection body. And this earthly material, which when the soul leaves it becomes a corpse, shall not at the resurrection be so restored as that the parts into which it is separated, and which under various forms and appearances become parts of other things (though they shall all return to the same body from which they were separated), must necessarily return to the same parts of the body in which they were originally situated. For otherwise, to suppose that the hair recovers all that our frequent clippings and shavings have taken away from it, and the nails all that we have so often pared off, presents to the imagination such a picture of ugliness and deformity, as to make the resurrection of the body all but incredible. But just as if a statue of some soluble metal were either melted by fire, or broken into dust, or reduced to a shapeless mass, and a sculptor wished to restore it from the same quantity of metal, it would make no difference to the completeness of the work what part of the statue any given particle of the ma- terial was put into, as long as the restored statue contained all the material of the original one ; so God, the Artificer of marvellous and unspeakable power, shall with marvellous and unspeakable rapidity restore our body, using up tlie whole material of which it originally consisted. Nor will it affect the completeness of its restoration whether hairs return to hairs, and nails to nails, or whether the part of these that had ^ 238 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CILVP. XC. perished be changed into flesh, and called tx) take its place in another part of the body, the gi-eat Artist taking careful heed that nothing shall be unbecoming or out of place. CiiAF. XC. — If there be differences and inequalities among the bodies of (host who rise aijain, there shall be nothing offtnsive or dis^jroportionatti in any. Nor does it necessarily follow that there shall be differences of stature among those who rise again, because they were of different statures during life ; nor is it certain that the lean shall rise again in their former leanness, and the fat in their former fatness. But if it is part of the Creator's design that each should preserve his own peculiarities of feature, and retain a recognisalde likeness to his former self, while in regard to other bodily advantages all should be equal, then the material of which each is composed may be so modified that none of it shall be lost, and that any defect may be supplied by Him who can create at His wiU out of nothing. But if in the bodies of those who rise again there shall be a well-ordered inequality, such as there is in the voices that make up a full harmony, then the material of each man's body shall be so dealt with that it shall form a man fit for the assemblies of the angels, and one who shall bring nothing among them to jar upon their sensibilities. And assuredly nothing that is unseemly shall be there ; but whatever shall be there shall be graceful and becoming : for if anything is not seendy, neither shall it be. Cii.vr. xci. — The bodies of the saints sJiall at the resurrection be .spiritual bodies. The bodies of the saints, then, shall rise again free from every defect, from every blemish, as from aU corruption, weight, and impediment. For their ease of movement shall be as complete as their happiness. Whence their bodies have been called spiritual, though undoubtedly they shall be bodies and not spirits. For just as now the body is called animate, though it is a body, and not a soul \anima\ so then the body shall be called spiritual, though it shall be a body, not a spirit.^ Hence, as far as regards the corruption whicli now weighs down the soul, and the vices which urge the flesh to lust against the spirit,'*^ it shall not then be flesh, but body ; for there are bodies which are called celestial. Wherefore it is » 1 Cor. XV. 41. » WisJ. ix. 15 ; Gal. v. 17. CHAP, xcil] the eesuerection of the dead. 239 said, " Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God ; " and, as if in explanation of this, " neither doth corruption in- herit incorruption." ^ What the apostle first called " flesh and blood," he afterwards calls " corruption ; " and what he first called " the kingdom of God," he afterwards calls " incorrup- tion." But as far as regards the substance, even then it shall be flesh. For even after the resurrection the body of Christ was called flesh.^ The apostle, however, says : " It is sown a natural body ; it is raised a spiritual body ; "^ because so perfect shall then be the harmony between flesh and spirit, the spirit keeping alive the subjugated flesh without the need of any nourishment, that no part of our nature shall be in discord with another ; but as we shall be free from enemies without, so we shall not have ourselves for enemies within. Chap. xcii. — The 7'esurrection of the lost. But as for those who, out of the mass of perdition caused by Jthe first man's sin, are not redeemed through the one Mediator between God and man, they too shall rise again, each with his own body, but only to be punished with the devil and his angels. Now, whether they shall rise again with all their diseases and deformities of body, bringing with them the diseased and deformed limbs which they possessed here, it would be labour lost to inquire. For we need not weary our- selves speculating about their health or their beauty, which are matters uncertain, when their eternal damnation is a matter of certainty. Nor need we inquire in what sense ^their body shall be incorruptible, if it be susceptible of pain ; or in what sense corruptible, if it be free from the possibility of death. For there is no true life except where there is happiness in life, and no true incorruption except where health is unbroken by any pain. When, however, the un- happy are not permitted to die, then, if I may so speak, death itself dies not; and where pain without intermission afflicts the soul, and never comes to an end, corruption itself is not completed. This is called in Holy Scripture "the second death." ^ ^^ ^ M Cor. XV. 50. - Luke xxiv. 39. ^ j Cor. xv. M. * Kev. ii. 2. 240 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. XCIII. Chap, xciii. — Both the first and the second deaths are tJie consequence of sin. Punishment is i)roportioned to fjuili. And neither the first death, which takes place when the soul is compelled to leave the body, nor the second death, which takes place when the soul is not permitted to leave the suffering body, would have been inflicted on man had no one sinned. And, of course, the mildest punislniient of all will fall upon those who have added no actual sin to the original sin they brought with them ; and as for the rest who have added such actual sins, the punishment of each will be the more tolerable in the next world, according as his iniquity has been less in this world. CiiAr. xciv. — The saints shall knoio more fully in the next world the benefits they have received by grace. Thus, when reprobate angels and men are left to endure everlasting punishment, the saints shall know more fully the benefits they have received by grace. Then, in contemplation of the actual facts, they shall see more clearly the meaning of the expression in the psalms, " I will sing of mercy and judgment;"^ for it is only of unmerited mercy that any is redeemed, and only in well-merited judgment that any is condemned. CiiAP. xcv. — Ood's judgments shall then be explained. Then shall be made clear much that is now dark For example, when of two infants, whose cases seem in all respects alike, one is by the mercy of God chosen to Himself, and the other is by His justice abandoned (wherein the one who is chosen may recognise what was of justice due to himself, had not mercy intervened) ; why, of these two, the one should have been chosen ratlier than the other, is to us an insoluble problem. And again, why miracles were not wrought in the presence of men who would have repented at the working of the miracles, wliile tliey were wrought in the presence of others who, it was known, would not repent. For our Lord says most distinctly : " Woe unto thee, Cliorazin ! woe unto thee, Bethsaida ! for if the miglity works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have re- 1 Ts. ci. 1. CHAP, xcvii.] god's permission of evil. 241 pented long ago in sackcloth and ashes," -^ And assuredly there was no injustice in God's not willing that they should be saved, though they could have been saved had He so willed it. Then shall be seen in the clearest light of wisdom what with the pious is now a faith, though it is not yet a matter of certain knowledge, how sure, how unchangeable, and how effectual is the will of God ; how many things He can do which He does not will to do, thou^^h willino: nothinof which He cannot perform ; and how true is the song of the psalmist, " But our God is in the heavens ; He hath done whatsoever He hath pleased."^ And this certainly is not true, if God has over willed anything that He has not performed ; and, still worse, if it was the will of man that hindered the Omnipotent from doing what He pleased. Nothing, therefore, happens but by the will of the Omnipotent, He either permitting it to be done, or Himself doing it. Chap. xcvi. — The ommpotent God does ivell even in the permission of evil. Nor can we doubt that God does well even in the permis- sion of what is evil. For He permits it only in the justice of His judgment. And surely all that is just is good. Although, therefore, evil, in so far as it is evil, is not a good ; yet the fact that evil as well as good exists, is a good. For if it were not a good that evil should exist, its existence would not be permitted by the omnipotent Good, who without doubt can as easily refuse to permit what He does not wish, as bring about what He does wish. And if we do not believe this, the very first sentence of our creed is endangered, where- in we profess to believe in God the Father Almighty. For He is not truly called Almighty if He cannot do whatsoever He pleases, or if the power of His almighty will is hindered by the will of any creature whatsoever. CuAP. XCVII. — In what sense does the apostle say that ** God xolll have all men to he saved,'' when, as a matter of fact, all are not saved ? Hence we must inquire in what sense is said of God what the apostle has mostly truly said : " Who will have all men to be saved." ^ For, as a matter of fact, not all, nor even a majority, are saved : so that it would seem that what God » Matt. xi. 21. 2 Ps. cxv. 3. » 1 Tim. ii. 4. ENCHIR. Q //^ 2-42 THE EXcriiniDiON. [chap, xcviii. wills is not done, man's will interfering with, and hindering the will of God. "When we ask the reason why all men are not saved, the ordinary answer is : " Because men themselves are not willing." This, indeed, cannot be said of infants, for it is not in tlieir power either to will or not to will. But if we could attribute to their will the childish movements they make at baptism, wdien they make all the resistance they can, we should say that even they are not willing to be saved. Our Lord says plainly, however, in the Gospel, when upbraiding tlie impious city : " How often would I have gathered thy cliildren together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!"^ as if the will of God had been overcome by the will of men, and when the weakest stood in the way with their w^ant of will, the will of the strongest could not be carried out. And where is that omnipotence which hath done all that it pleased on earth and in heaven, if God willed to gather together the children of Jerusalem, and did not accomplish it ? or rather, Jerusalem was not willing that her children should be jiathered tocrether ? But even thoiicrh she o o o was unwilling. He gathered together as many of her children as He wished : for He does not will some things and do them, and will others and do them not ; but " He hath done all that He pleased in heaven and in earth." y Chap, xcviii. — Predestination to eternal life is wholly of OocUsfree grace. ^^ And, moreover, who will be so foolish and blasphemous as to I say that God cannot change the evil wills of men, whichever, whenever, and wheresoever He chooses, and direct them to what is good ? But when He docs this, He does it of mercy ; when He does it not, it is of justice that He does it not ; for "He hath mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He -ivill He hardeneth."* And when the apostle said this, he "\vas illustrating the grace of God, in connection with which he had just spoken of the twins in the womb of Eebecca, " who being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of Him that calleth, it was said unto her, The elder shall servo the younger."^ And in reference to this > Matt xxiii, 37. » lium. ix. 18. ' Rom. ix. 12. CHAP, xcviii.] god's sovereign geace in election. 243 matter he quotes another prophetic testimony : " Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." ^ But perceiving how what he had said might affect those who could not penetrate by their understanding the depth of this grace : " What shall we say then ? " he says : '" Is there unrighteouness with God ? God forbid."^ For it seems unjust that, in the absence of any merit or demerit from good or evil works, God should love the one and hate the other. Xow, if the apostle had wished us to understand that there were future good works of the one, and evil works of the other, which of course God foreknew, he would never have said, " not of works," but, " of future works," and in that way would have solved the difficulty, or rather there would then have been no difficulty to solve. As it is, however, after answering, " God forbid ; " that is, God forbid that there should be unrighteousness with God ; he goes on to prove that there is no unrighteousness in God's doing this, and says : " For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion."^ JSTow, who but a fool would think that God was unrighteous, either in inflicting penal justice on those who had earned it, or in extending mercy to the unworthy ? Then he draws his conclusion : " So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.'"* Thus both the twins were born children of wrath, not on account of any works of their own, but because they were bound in the fetters of that orioinal condemnation which o came through Adam. But He who said, " I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy," loved Jacob of His undeserved grace, and hated Esau of His deserved judgment. And as this judgment was due to both, the former learnt from the case of the latter that the fact of the same punishment not falling upon himself gave him no room to glory in any merit of his own, but only in the riches of the divine grace ; because " it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." I And indeed the whole face, and, if I may use the expression, every lineament of the counte-/^ nance of Scripture conveys by a very profound analogy this » TJom. ix. 13 ; Mai. i. 2, 3. « I^om. ix. 14. 2 Horn. ix. 15 ; Ex. xxxiii. 19. * Horn. ix. IG. ■^ 244 THE ENCIIIPJDIOX. [CIIAP. XCIX. wholesome warning to every one who looks carefully into it, that he who glories should glory in the Lord.^ Chap. xcix. — As God's mercy is free, so Ilisjudfjmcnis are just, and cannot be gainsaid. Now after commending the mercy of God, saying, " So it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy," that he might commend His justice also (for the man who does not obtain mercy finds, not iniquity, but justice, there being no iniquity with God), he immediately adds : " For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show my power in thee, and that my name might be declared through- out all the earth." ^ And then he draws a conclusion that applies to both, that is, both to His mercy and His justice : " Therefore hath He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth."^ " He hath mercy " of His great goodness, " He hardeneth " without any injustice ; so that neither can he that is pardoned glory in any merit of his own, nor he that is condemned complain of anything but his own demerit. For it is^ gnuia-^one that separates the re- deemed from the lost, all having been involved in one common perdition through their common origin. Now if any one, on hearing this, should say, "Why doth He yet find fault ? for who hath resisted His will ? " * as if a man ought not to be blamed for being bad, because God hath mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth, God forbid that we should be ashamed to answer as we see the apostle answered : " Nay, but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God ? Shall the thing formed say to Him that formed it. Why hast Thou made me thus ? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour ? "* Now some foolish people tliink that in this place the apostle had no answer to give ; and for want of a reason to render, rebuked the presumption of his interrogator. But there is great weiglit in this saying : " Nay, but, man, who art thou ? " and in such a matter as this it sufrfjests to a man in a •oo- ' Coinp. 1 Cor. i. CI. ' Koni. ix. 17 ; Kx. ix. IG. ^ ijom. ix. IS. * Horn. ix. 19. * liom. ix. 20, 21. CHAP. C] god's purpose NEVER DEFEATED. 245 single word the limits of his capacity, and at the same time does in reality convey an important reason. For if a man does not understand these matters, who is he that he should reply against God ? And if he does understand them, he finds no further room for reply. For then he perceives that the whole human race was condemned in its rebellious head by a divine judgment so just, that if not a single member of the race had been redeemed, no one could justly have questioned the justice of God; and that it was right that those who are redeemed should be redeemed in such a way as to show, by the greater number who are unredeemed and left in their just condemnation, what the whole race deserved, and whither the deserved judgment of God would lead even the re- deemed, did not His undeserved mercy interpose, so that every mouth might be stopped of those who wish to glory in their own merits, and that he that glorieth might glory in the Lord.-^ Chap. c. — The will of God is never defeated, though much is done that is contrary to His ivill. These are the great works of the Lord, sought out accord- ing to all His pleasure,^ and so wisely sought out, that when the intelligent creation, both angelic and human, sinned, doing not His will but their own. He used the very will of the creature which was working in opposition to the Creator's will as an instrument for carrying out His will, the supremely Good thus turning to good account even what is evil, to the con- demnation of those whom in His justice He has predestined to punishment, and to the salvation of those whom in His mercy He has predestined to grace. For, as far as relates to their own consciousness, these creatures did what God wished not to be done : but in view of God's omnipotence, they could in no wise effect their purpose. For in the very fact that they acted in opposition to His will, His will concerning -^them was fulfilled. And hence it is that " the works of the Lord are great, sought out according to all His pleasure," because in a way unspeakably strange and wonderful, even what is done in opposition to His will does not defeat His 1 Rom. iii. 19 ; 1 Cor. i. 31. * Ps. cxi. 2 (LXX.) : "Tlie worls-s of the Lord arc great, sought out of all them that have pleasure therein. " (A. V.) 246 THE ENCIIIllIDION. [CIIAP. CI. ■svill. For it would not be clone did He not permit it (and of course His permission is not unwillincj, but willing) ; nor would a Good Being permit evil to be done only that in His omnipotence He can turn evil into good. Chap, ci.— The will of God, which Is always fjood, is sometimes fulfilled throiirjh the evil will of man. Sometimes, however, a man in the goodness of his will desires something that God does not desire, even though God's will is also good, nay, much more fully and more surely good (for His will never can be evil) : for example, if a good son is anxious that his father should live, when it is God's good will that he should die. Again, it is possible for a man with evil will to desire what God wills in His goodness : for example, if a bad son wishes his father to die, when this is also the will of God. It is plain that the former wishes what God does not wish, and that the latter wishes what God does wish ; and yet the filial love of the former is more in harmony with the good will of God, though its desire is different from God's, than the want of filial affection of the latter, thoudi its desire is the same as God's. So necessary is it, in determining whether a man's desire is one to be approved or disapproved, to consider what it is proper for man, and what it is proper for God, to desire, and what is in each case the real motive of the will. For God accomplishes some of His purposes, which I of course are all good, through the evil desires of wicked men : for example, it was through the wicked designs of the Jews, working out the good purpose of the Father, that Christ was slain ; and tliis event was so truly good, that when the Apostle Teter expressed his unwillingness that it should take place, he was designated Satan by Him wlio had come to be slain.^ How good seemed the intentions of the pious believers who were unwilling tlint Paul should go up to Jerusalem lest the evils wliicli Agabus had foretold sliould there befall him \'^ And yet it was God's purpose that he should suffer these evils for preaching the faith of Christ, and thereby become a ^witness for Christ. And this purpose of His, which was good, God did not fullil tlirough the good counsels of the Christians, but throngli the evil counsels of the Jews ; so that » Matt. xvi. 21-23. « Acts xxi. 10-12. CHAP, cm.] INTERPRETATION OF 1 TIM. II. 4. 247 those who opposed His purpose were more truly His servants than those who were the willing instruments of its accom- plishment. . -CuAP, cii. — Tlie will of the omnipotent God is never defeated, and is never evil. ^ But however strong may be the purposes either of angels or of men, whether of good or bad, whether these purposes fall in with the will of God or run counter to it, the will of the Omnipotent is never defeated ; and His will never can be evil ; because even when it inflicts evil it is just, and what is just is certainly not evil. The omnipotent God, then, whether in mercy He pitieth whom He will, or in judgment hardeneth whom He will, is never unjust in what He does, never does anything except of His own free-will, and never wills anything that He does not perform. -, Chap. cm. — Interpretation of the expression in 1 Tim. ii. 4 : " Who icillhave all men to he saved.^' Accordingly, when we hear and read in Scripture that He / will have all men to be saved," although we know well that all men are not saved, we are not on that account to restrict the omnipotence of God, but are rather to understand the Scripture, " Who will have all men to be saved," as meaning that no man is saved unless God wills his salvation : not that there is no man whose salvation He does not will, , but that no man is saved apart from His will; and that, J ^&^ therefore, we should pray Him to will our salvation, because if He will it, it must necessarily be accomplished. And it was of prayer to God that the apostle was speaking when he used this expression. And on the same principle we interpret the expression in the Gospel : " The true light wdiicli lighteth every man that cometh into the world : " ^ not that there is no man who is not enlightened, but that no man is enlightened except by Him. Or, it is said, "Who will have all men to be saved;" not that there is no man whose salvation He does not will (for how, then, explain the fact that He was unwill- ing to work miracles in the presence of some who, He said, would have repented if He had worked them ?), but that we are to understand by " all men," the human race in all 1 1 Tim. ii. 4. 2 joi^ i^ 9. 248 THE ENCiiiniDioy. [chap. cut. its varieties of rank and circumstances, — kings, subjects ; noble, plebeian, bi^^li, low, learned, and unlearned ; the sound in body, the feeble, the clever, the dull, the foolish, the rich, the poor, and those of middling circumstances ; males, females, infants, boys, youths ; young, middle-aged, and old men ; of every tongue, of every fasliion, of all arts, of all pro- fessions, with all the innumerable differences cf will and con- science, and whatever else there is that makes a distinction among men. For which of all these classes is there out of which God does not will that men should be saved in all nations through His only-begotten Son, our Lord, and there- fore does save them ; for the Omnipotent cannot will in vain, whatsoever He may will ? Kow the apostle had enjoined that prayers should be made for all men, and had specially added, " For kings, and for all that are in authority," who might be supposed, in the pride and pomp of worldly station, to shrink from the humility of the Christian faith. Tlien saying, " For tliis is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour," that is, that prayers should be made for such as these, he immediately adds, as if to remove any ground of despair, "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto tlie knowledge of the truth." ^ God, then, in His great condescension has judged it good to grant to the prayers of the humble the salvation of the exalted ; and assuredly we v/have many examples of this. Our Lord, too, makes use of the same mode of speech in the Gospel, when He says to the riiarisees : " Ye tithe mint, and rue, and every herb." ^ For the Pliarisees did not tithe what belonged to others, nor all tlie herbs of all tlie inhabitants of other lands. As, tlien, in this place we must understand by " every herb," every kind of herbs, so in the furmer passage we may understand by " all men," every sort of men. And we may interpret it in any other way we please, so long as we are not compelled to believe that the omnipotent God lias willed anything to be done which was nut dune: fur, setting aside all ambiguitios, if " He hath done all that He pleased in heaven and in earth," ^ 1 1 Tim. ii. 1-4. • I.tikc xi. '12. (" All mnnnor of licrhs." A-V.) • Ps. cxv. 3. ("Our God is ii) the heavens : He hath done whatsoever He hath pkabcd." A.V.) CHAP. cv. man's feee-will. 249 as the psalmist sings of Him, He certainly did not will to do anything that He hath not done. Chap. ciy.—GoiI, forehiow'mg the sin of the first man, ordered His own purposes accordingly. vj(^ Wherefore, God would have been willing to preserve even ^'^ the first man in that state of salvation in which he was created, and after he had begotten sons to remove him at a fit time, without the intervention of death, to a better place, where he should have been not only free from sin, but free even from the desire of sinning, if He had foreseen that man would have the stedfast will to persist in the state of innocence in which he was created. But as He foresaw that man would make a bad use of his free-will, that is, would sin, God arranged His own designs rather with a view to do good to man even in his sinfulness, that thus the good will of the Omnipotent might not be made void by the evil will of man, but might be fulfilled in spite of it. CHAr. cv. — Man teas so created as to he able to choose either good or evil: in the future life, the choice of evd ivill be imjjossible. ISTow it was expedient that man should be at first so createdy as to have it in his power both to will what was right and to will what was wrong ; not without reward if he willed the former, and not without punishment if he willed the latter. But in the future life it shall not be in his power to will evil ; and yet this will constitute no restriction on the freedom of his will. On the contrary, his will shall be much freer whenf. it shall be wholly impossible for him to be the slave of sin/ We should never think of blaming the will, or saying that it was no will, or that it was not to be called free, when we so desire happiness, that not only do we shrink from misery, but find it utterly impossible to do otherwise. As, then, the soul even now finds it impossible to desire unhappiness, so in Juture it shall be wholly impossible for it to desire sin. But God's arrangement was not to be broken, according to which He willed to show how good is a rational being who is able even to refrain from sin, and yet how much better is one who cannot sin at all ; just as that was an inferior sort of im- mortality, and yet it was immortality, when it was possible for man to avoid death, although there is reserved for the 250 THE ENCHIRIDION. [CHAP. CVI. future a more perfect immortality, when it shall be impossible for man to die. CuAP. CVI. — Tlic (jrace of God teas necessary to viaji'^ salvation lefore the fall, as well as after it. The former immortality man lost tlirough the exercise of his free-will ; die latter he shall obtain through grace, whereas, if he had not sinned, he should have obtained it by deseit. Even in that case, however, there could have been no merit without grace ;^ because, although the mere exercise of man's free-will was sufficient to bring in sin, liis free-will would not have sufficed for his maintenance in righteousness, unless God had assisted it by imparting a portion of His unchangeable goodness. Just as it is in man's power to die whenever he will (for, not to speak of other means, any one can put an end to liimself by simple abstinence from food), but tlie mere will cannot preserve life in the absence of food and the other means of life ; so man in paradise was able of his mere will, simply by abandoning righteousness, to destroy himself ; but to have maintained a life of righteousness would have been too much for his will, unless it liad been sustained by the Creator's power. After the fall, Jiowever, a more abundant exercise of God's mercy was required, because the will itself had to be freed from the bondage in which it was held by sin and death. And the will owes its freedom in no degree io itself, but solely to the grace of God which comes by faith in Jesus Christ ; so that the very will, tlirough which we accept all the other gifts of God wliich lead us on to His eternal gift, is itself prepared of the Lord, as the Scripture says.^ Chat. cvii. — Eternal life, thowjh the rnrard of good tcorks, is itself the gift of God. WHicrefore, even eternal life itself, which is surely the reward of good works, the apostle calls the gift of God. "For the wages of sin," he says, " is death ; but the gift of God is eternal lifu through Jesus Christ our Lord."^ Wages (sfipcndiuvi) is paid as a recompense for military service ; it is not a gift : ^ Prov. xvi. 1. ("TliL' ]'rtji:iratiou of llu' luart iii uuin ... is from the Lord." A.V.) ' Hum. vi. 23. CHAP. CVIII.] ETERXAL LIFE GOD's FEEE GIFT. 251 wherefore lie says, " the ivages of sin is death," to show that death was not inflicted undeservedly, but as the due re- compense of sin. But a gift, unless it is wholly unearned, is not a gift at all.^ We are to understand, then, that man's good deserts are themselves the gift of God, so that when these obtain the recompense of eternal life, it is simply grace given for grace. Man, therefore, was so made upright that, though unable to remain in his uprightness without divine help, he could of his own mere will depart from it. And whichever of these courses he had chosen, God's will would have been done, either by him, or concerning him. Therefore, as he chose to do his own will rather than God's, the will of God is fulfilled concerning him ; for God, out of one and the same heap of perdition which constitutes the race of man, makes one vessel to honour, another to dishonour ; to honour in mercy, to dishonour in judgment ;^ that no one may glory in man, and consequently not in himself. _ C'HAr. CVIII.— -4 Mediator ivas necessary to i^econcUe lis to God ; and unless tJus Mediator had been God, He could not have been our Redeemer. For we could not be redeemed, even through the one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, if He were not also God. Now when Adani was created, he, being a righteous man, had no need ofi'Vmediator. But when sin had placed a wide gulf between God and the human race, it was expedient that a IMediator, who alone of the human race was born, lived, and died without sin, should reconcile us to God, and procure even for our bodies a resurrection to eternal life, in order that the pride of man might be exposed and cured through the humility of God ; that man might be shown how far he had departed from God, when God became incar- nate to bring him back ; tliat an example might be set to disobedient man in the life of obedience of the God-Man ; that the fountain of grace might be opened by the Only- begotten taking upon Himself the form of a servant, a form which had no antecedent merit; that an earnest of that resurrection of the body which is promised to the redeemed might be given in the resurrection of the Eedeemer ; that the devil might be subdued by the same nature which it was his ' Comp. Rom. xi. 6. " Kom. ix. 21. / 252 THE ENCITIPJDION. [CHAP. CIX. boast to have deceived, and yet man not glorified, lest pride should again spring up ; and, in fine, with a view to all the advantages which the thoughtful can perceive and describe, or perceive without being able to describe, as flowing from the transcendent mystery of the person of the Mediator. Chap. cix. — Tlie slate of the soul during the interval between death and the resurrection. During the time, moreover, which intervenes between a man's death and the final resurrection, the soul dwells in a hidden retreat, wliere it enjoys rest or suffers affliction just in proi)ortion to the merit it has earned by the life which it led on earth. CiiAP. ex. — The half Jit to thesoids of the dead from the sacraments and alms of their living friends. Xor can it be denied that the souls of the dead are benefited by the piety of their living friends, who offer the sacrifice of the Mediator, or give alms in the church on their behalf But these services are of advantage only to those who during their lives have earned such merit, that services of this kind can help them. For there is a manner of life which is neither so good as not to require these services after death, nor so bad that such services are of no avail after death ; there is, on the other hand, a kind of life so good as not to require them; and again, one so bad that when life is over they render no help. Therefore, it is in this life that all the merit or demerit is acquired, which can either relieve or aggravate a man's suffer- ings after this life. No one, then, need hope that after he is dead he shall obtain merit with God which he has neglected to secure liere. And accordingly it is plain that the services which the church celebrates for the dead are in no way opposed to the apostle's words : " For we must all appear before the judgment- seat of Christ ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad ; " ^ for the merit which ren- ders such services as I speak of profitable to a man, is earned while he lives in the body. It is not to every one that these services are profitable. And why are they not profitable to all, except because of the different kinds of lives that men ' 2 Cor. V. 10 ; comp. Rom. xiv. 10. CHAP. CXII.J THE ETEFvNAL PUNISHMENT OF THE WICKED. 253 lead in the body ? When, then, sacrifices either of the altar or of alms are offered on behalf of all the baptized dead, they are thank-offerings for the very good, they are propitiatory offerings for the not very bad ; and in the case of the very bad, even though they do not assist the dead, they are a species of con- solation to the living. And where they are profitable, their benefit consists either in obtaining a full remission of sins, or at least in making the condemnation more tolerable. Chap. cxi. — After the resurrection there shall he two distinct kingdoms, one of eternal hapinness, the other of eternal 'misery. After the resurrection, however, when the final, universal judgment has been completed, there shall be two kingdoms, each with its own distinct boundaries, the one Christ's, the other the Devil's ; the one consisting of the good, the other of the bad, — both, however, consisting of angels and men. The former shall have no will, the latter no power, to sin, and neither shall have any power to choose death ; but the former shall live truly and happily in eternal life, the latter shall drag a miserable existence in eternal death without the power of dying ; for the life and the death shall both be without end. But among the former there shall be degrees of happiness, one being more pre-eminently happy than another ; and among the latter there shall be degrees of misery, one being more endur- ably miserable than another. Chap. cxii. — There is no ground in Scripture for the opinion of those who deny the eternity of future xmnlshments. It is in vain, then, that some, indeed very many, make moan over the eternal punishment, and perpetual, unintermitted torments of the lost, and say they do not believe it shall be so ; not, indeed, that they directly oppose themselves to Hol}^ Scripture, but, at the suggestion of their own feelings, they soften down everything that seems hard, and give a milder turn to statements which they think are rather designed to _terrify than to be received as literally true. For " Hath God," 'they say, " forgotten to be gracious ? hath He in anger shut up His tender mercies ? "^ Now, they read tliis in one of the holy psalms. But without doubt we are to understand it as spoken of those who are elsewhere called "vessels of mercy,"" because 1 Vs. Ixxvii. 9. 2 p^o„-i^ i^_ 23. 2. J -4 THE ENCHIRIDION. [chap, cxiii. even they are freed from misery not on account of any merit of their own, but solely through the pity of God. Or, if the men \ve speak of insist that this passai^e applies to all man- kind, there is no reason why they should therefore suppose that there will he an end to the punishment of those of whom it is said, " These shall go away into everlasting punishment ; " for this shall end in the same manner and at the same time as the happiness of those of whom it is said, " but the righteous unto life eternal." ^ But let them suppose, if the thought gives them pleasure, that the pains of the damned are, at certain intervals, in some degree assuaged. For even in this case the wrath of God, that is, their condemnation (for it is this, and not any disturbed feeling in the mind of God that is called His wrath), abideth upon them ;^ that is. His wrath, though it still remains, does not shut up His tender mercies ; though His tender mercies are exhibited, not in putting an end to their eternal punishment, but in mitigating, or in granting them a respite from, their torments ; for the psalm does not say, " to put an end to His anger," or, " w^ien His anger is passed by," but " in His auger." l^ow, if this anger stood alone, or if it existed in the smallest conceivable degree, yet to be lost out of the kingdom of God, to be an exile from the city of God, to be alienated from the life of God, to have no share in that great goodness which God hath laid up for them that fear Him, and hath wrought out for tliem that trust in Him,^ would be a punishment so great, that, supposing it to be eternal, no torments that we know of, continued through as many ages as man's imagination can conceive, could be compared with it. Chap, cxiii. — The death of the wiclrd shall he eternal in tlic same sense as the life of the saints. This perpetual death of the wicked, then, that is, their alienation from the life of God, shall abide for ever, and shall be common to them all, whatever men, prompted by their human affections, may conjecture as to a variety of punish- ments, or as to a mitigation or intermission of their woes ; just as the eternal life of the saints shall abide for ever, and shall be common to them all, whatever grades of rank and » Matt. XXV. 40. 2 John iii. 36. ' Ps. xxxi. 19. CHAP CXV.] THE LOPvD'S PRAYER. 255 honour there may be among those who shine with an harmonious effulgence. Chap, cxiv.— Having dealt with faith, we now come to speah of hope. Every- thing that pertains to hope is embraced in the Lord's Prayer. Out of this confession oi faith, which is briefly compre- hended in the Creed, and which, carnally understood, is milk lor babes, but, spiritually apprehended and studied, is meat for strong men, springs the good hope of believers ; and this is accompanied by a holy love. But of these matters, all of which are true objects of faith, those only pertain to hope which are embraced in the Lord's Prayer. For, " Cursed be the man that trusteth in man " ^ is the testimony of holy writ ; and, consequently, this curse attaches also to the man who trusteth in himself. Therefore, except from God the Lord we ought to ask for nothing either that we hope to do well, or hope to obtain as a reward of our good works. Chap, cxv. — The seven petitions oj the Lord's Prayer, accojxUng to Matthew. Accordingly, in the Gospel according to Matthew the Lord's Prayer seems to embrace seven petitions, three of which ask for eternal blessings, and the remaining four for temporal ; these latter, however, being necessary antecedents to the attainment of the eternal. For when we say, " Hallowed be Thy name : Thy kingdom come : Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven " ^ (which some have interpreted, not un- ^ fairly, in body as well as in spirit), we ask for blessings that ' are to be enjoyed for ever; which are indeed begun in this world, and grow in us as we grow in grace, but in their per- fect state, which is to be looked for in another life, shall be a possession for evermore. But when we say, " Give us this day our daily bread : and forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors : and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil,"^ who does not see that we ask for blessings that have reference to the wants of this present life ? In that eternal life, where we hope to live for ever, the hallowing of God's name, and His kingdom, and His will in our spirit and body, shall be brought to perfection, and shall endure to ever- lasting. But our daibj bread is so called because there is » Jer. xvii. 5. - Matt. vi. 9, 10. 3 Matt. vi. 11-13. 256 THE EN'CIIIKIDIOX. [CIIAP. CXVI. here constaut need for as much nourishment as the spirit and the flesh demand, whether we understand the expression spiritually, or carnally, or in both senses. It is here too that we need the forgiveness that we ask, for it is here tliat we commit the sins ; here are the temptations which allure or drive us into sin ; here, in a word, is the evil from which we desire deliverance : but in that other world there shall be none of these things. Ch.\p. CXVI. — Luke expresses the substance of these seven petitions more briefly in five. But the Evangelist Luke in his version of the Lord's Prayer embraces not seven, but five petitions : not, of course, that there is any discrepancy between the two evangelists, but that Luke indicates by his very brevity the mode in which the seven petitions of Matthew are to be understood. For God's name is hallowed in the spirit ; and God's kingdom shall come in the resurrection of the body. Luke, therefore, intending to show that the third petition is a sort of repetition of the first two, has chosen to indicate that by omitting the third alto- gether.^ Then he adds three others ; one for daily bread, another for pardon of sin, another for immunity from temptation. And what IMatthew puts as the last petition, "but deliver us from evil," Luke has omitted,^ to show us that it is embraced in the previous petition about tempta- tion. Matthew, indeed, himself says, " hut deliver," not " and deliver," as if to show that the petitions are virtually one : do not this, but this ; so that every man is to understand that he is delivered from eyil in the very lact of his not being led into temptation. Chap, cxvii. — Love, which is grmter than faith and hope, is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Qhost. And now as to love, which the apostle declares to be greater than the other two graces, that is, than faith and hope," the greater the measure in which it dwells in a man, the better is the nian in whom it dwells. For when there is a question as to whether a man is good, one does not ask what he believes, or what he hopes, but what he loves. For the man who loves aright no doubt believes and hopes aright ; whereas the man * These petitions are not omitted in the AuthomeJ Version. " 1 Cor. xiii. 13. CHAP. CXVIII.] TI-IE FOUR STAGES OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE. 257 who has not love believes in vain, even though his beliefs are true ; and hopes in vain, even though the objects of his hope are a real part of true happiness ; unless, indeed, he believes and hopes for this, that he may obtain by prayer the blessing of love. For, although it is not possible to hope without love, it may yet happen that a man does not love that which is necessary to the attainment of his hope ; as, for example, if he hopes for eternal life (and who is there that does not desire this ?) and yet does not love righteousness, without which no one can attain to eternal life. Now this is the true faith of Christ which the apostle speaks of, " which worketh by love ; "^ and if there is anything that it does not yet embrace in its love, asks that it may receive, seeks that it may find, and knocks that it may be opened unto it.^ For faith obtains through prayer that which the law commands. For without the gift of God, that is, without the Holy Spirit, through whom love is shed abroad in our hearts,^ the law can command, but it cannot assist ; and, moreover, it makes a man a transgressor, for he can no longer excuse himself on the plea of ignorance. ISTow carnal lust reigns where there is not the love of God. Chap, cxviii. — The four stages of the Christian's life, and the four corresponding stages of the Church's history. When, sunk in the darkest depths of ignorance, man lives according to the flesh, undisturbed by any struggle of reason or conscience, this is his first state. Afterwards, when through the law has come the knowledge of sin, and the Spirit of God has not yet interposed His aid, man, striving to live according to the law, is thwarted in his efforts and falls into conscious sin, and so, being overcome of sin, becomes its slave (" for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brouojht in bondage "^) ; and thus the effect produced by the knowledge of the commandment is this, that sin worketh in man all manner of concupiscence, and he is involved in the additional guilt of wilful transgression, and that is fulfilled which is written: " The law entered that the offence misrht abound."^ This is man's second state. But if God has regard to him, and in- spires him with faith in God's help, and the Spirit of God 1 Gal. V. 6. 2 jjatt, vii. 7. a p^q^^ y, 5. * 2 Pet. ii. 19. ^ Fiom. v. 20. ENCHIR. R THE ENCniRIDIOy. [CHAP. CXIX. begins to work in him, then the mightier power of love strives against the power of tlie flesh ; and although there is still in the man's own nature a power tliat fights against him (for his disease is not completely cured), yet he lives the life of the just by faith, and lives in righteousness so ftir as he does not yield to evil lust, but conquers it by the love of holiness. This is the third state j of a man of good hope ; and he who by stedfast piety advances in this course, shall attain at last to peace, that peace which, after this life is over, shall be per- fected in the repose of the spirit, and finally in the resurrection of the body. Of these four different stages the first is before the law, the second is under the law, the third is under iirace. and tlie fourth is in full and perfect peace. Thus, too, has the history of God's people been ordered according to His pleasure who disposeth all things in number, and measure, and weight.^ For the Church existed at first before the law ; then under the law, which w\is given by Moses ; then under grace, which was first made manifest in the coming of the Mediator. Not, indeed, that this grace was absent previously, but, in harmony with the arrangements of the time, it w^as veiled and hidden. For none, even of the just men of old, could find salvation apart from the faith of Christ ; nor unless He had been known to them could their ministry have been used to convey pro- phecies concerning Him to us, some more plain, and some more obscure. Chap. cxix. — The grace of regeneration washes away all past sin and all original guilt. Now in wliichever of these four stages (as we may call them) the grace of regeneration finds any particular man, all liis past sins are there and then pardoned, and the guilt whicli he contracted in his birth is removed in his new birth ; and so true is it that " the wind bloweth where it listeth," " that some have never known the second stage, that ot slavery under the law, but have received the divine assistance as soon as they received the commandment. Cll.\r. CXX. — Death cannot injure those who have received the gract oj regeneration, Eut before a man can receive the commandment, it is ' Comp. Wisd. xi. 21. " John iii. 8. CHAP. CXXI.] LOVE IS THE END OF THE COMMANDMENT. 259 necessary that he should live according to the flesh. But if once he has received the grace of regeneration, death shall not injure him, even if he should forthwith depart from this life ; " for to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that He might be Lord both of the dead and the living ;"^ nor shall death retain dominion over him for whom Christ freely died. Chap. cxxi. — Love is the end of all the commandments, and God Himself is love. All the commandments of God, then, are embraced in love, of which the apostle says : " Now the end of the command- ment is charity, out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned."^ Thus the end of every command- ment is charity, that is, every commandment has love for its aim. But whatever is done either through fear of punishment or from some other carnal motive, and has not for its principle that love which the Spirit of God sheds abroad in the heart, is not done as it ought to be done, however it may appear to men. For this love embraces both the love of God and the love of our neighbour, and " on these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets,"^ we may add the Gospel and the apostles. For it is from these that we hear this voice: The end of the commandment is charity, and God is love."* Wherefore, all God's commandments, one of which is, " Thou shalt not commit adultery,"^ and all those precepts which are not commandments but special counsels, one of which is, " It is good for a man not to touch a w^oman," ^ are rightly [1 carried out only when the motive principle of action is the \jll love of God, and the love of our neighbour in God. And this applies both to the present and the future life. We love God now by faith, then we shall love Him through sight. Now we love even our neighbour by faith ; for we who are ourselves mortal know not the hearts of mortal men. But in the future life, the Lord " both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts, and then shall every man have praise of God ;" ^ for every man shall love and praise in his neighbour the virtue which, ^ Rom. xiv. 9. ^1 Tim. i. 5. ^ ^Matt. xxii. 40 ; comp. Rom. v. 5. 4 1 Tim. i. 5 ; 1 Joliu iv. IG. ^ Comp. Matt. v. 27 aud Rom. xiii. 9. ^ 1 Cor. vii. 1. ^1 Cor. iv. 5. 200 THE ENCnirvIDION. [CIIAP. CXXII. that it may not be hid, the Lord Himself shall bring to light. Moreover, lust diminishes as love grows, till th'e latter grows to such a height that it can grow no higher here. For " greater love liath no man than tlxis, that a man lay down his life for his friends."^ Who then can tell how great love shall be in the future world, when there shall be no lust for it to restrain and conquer ? for that will be the perfection of health when there shall be no struggle with death. CiiAP. CXXII. — Conclusion. But now there must be an end at last to this volume. And it is for yourself to judge whether you should call it a haiid- hoolc, or should use it as such. I, however, thinking that your zeal in Christ ought not to be despised, and believing and hoping all good of you in dependence on our Eedeemer's help, and loving you very much as one of the members of His I body, have, to the best of my ability, written this book for you i on Faith, Ho;pc, and Love. May its value be equal to its V length. ^ Johu XV. 13. TREATISE ON THE CATECHISING OF THE UNINSTRUCTED. ■201 INTRODUCTOR V NOTICE. IN the fourteenth chapter of the second book of his Retracta- tions, Auo'ustine makes the following; statement : " There is also a book of ours on the subject of the Catechising of the Uninstructed, that being, indeed, the express title by which it is desicjnated. In this book, where I have said, ' Neither did the angel, ivho, in com'pany luith other spirits ivho luere his satellites, forsook in j^^^ide the obedience of God, and hecame the devil, do any hurt to God, hut to himself ; for God knovjeth hoiv to dispose of soids that leave Him : ' it would be more appro- priate to say, ' spirits that lectve Him! inasmuch as the ques- tion dealt with angels. This book commences in these terms : ' You have requested me, brother Deogr alias! " The com- position so described in the passage cited is reviewed by Augjustine in connection with other works which he had in hand about the year 400 a.d., and may therefore be taken to belong to that date. It has been conjectured that the person to whom it is addressed may perhaps be the same with the presbyter Deogratias, to whom, as we read in the epistle which now ranks as the hundred and second, Augustine wrote about the year 406, in reply to some questions of the pagans which w^ere forwarded to him from Carthage. The Benedictine editors introduce the treatise in the following terms : " At the request of a deacon of Carthage, Augustine undertakes the task of teaching the art of catechising ; and in the first place, he gives certain injunctions, to the effect that this kind of duty may be discharged not only in a settled method and an apt order, but also without tediousness, and in a spirit of cheerfulness. Thereafter reducing his injunctions to practical use, he gives an example of what he means by delivering two set discourses, presenting parallels to each other, the one being somewhat lengthened and the other very brief, but both suitable for the instruction of any individual whose desire is to be a Christian." 263 ON THE CATECHISING OF THE UNINSTEUCTED. IN ONE BOOK. Chap. i. — Hoio Augustine writes in answer to a favour ashed by a deacon of Carthage. 1. "V^OU have requested me, brother Deogratias, to send JL you in writing something which might be of service to you in the matter of catechising the uninstructed. For you have informed me that in Carthage, where you hold the position of a deacon, persons, who have to be taught the Christian faith from its very rudiments, are frequently brought to you by reason of your enjoying the reputation of possessing a rich gift in catechising, due at once to an intimate acquaint- ance with the faith, and to an attractive method of discourse ;^ but that you almost always find yourself in a difficulty as to the manner in which a suitable declaration is to be made of the j)recise doctrine, the belief of which constitutes us Chris- tians : regarding the point at which our statement of the same ought to commence, and the limit to which it should be allowed to proceed : and with respect to the question whether, when our narration is concluded, we ought to make use of any kind of exhortation, or simply specify those precepts in the obser- vance of which the person to whom we are discoursing may know the Christian life and profession to be maintained.^ At the same time, you have made the confession and complaint that it has often befallen you that in the course of a length- 1 Heading et doctrlnafidei et suavitate sermonis, instead of which, however, et doctrinam . . . suavitatem, etc. also occurs, =: possessing at once a rich gift in catechising, and an intimate acquaintance with the faith, and an attractive method of discourse. 2 Beading retineri as in the mss. Some editions give retinere =■ know how to maintain the Christian life and profession. 265 26G ON CATECHISING. [CHAP. II. ened and languid address you liave become profitless and dis- tasteful even to yourself, not to speak of the learner whom you have been endeavouring to instruct by your utterance, and the other parties wlio have been present as hearers ; and that you have been constrained by these straits to put upon me the constraint of that love which I owe to you, so that I may not feel it a burdensome thing among all my engage- ments to write you sometliing on this sul.)ject. 2. As for myself then, if, in the exercise of those capaci- ties which through the bounty of our Lord I am enabled to present, the same Lord requires me to offer any manner of aid to those whom He has made brethren to me, I feel constrained not only by that love and service which is due from me to you on the terms of familiar friendship, but also by that which I owe universally to my mother the Churcli, by no means to refuse the task, but rather to take it up with a prompt and devoted willingness. For the more extensively I desire to see the treasure of the Lord ^ distributed, the more does it become my duty, if I ascertain that the stewards, who are my ftdlow- servants, find any difficulty in laying it out, to do all that lies in my power to the end that they may be able to accomplish easily and expeditiously what they sedulously and earnestly aim at. Chap. u.—ITow it often happens that a discourse trhich gives pleasure to the hearer is dijitasicful to the speaker ; and lohat explanation is to be ojlred of that fact. 3. But as regards the idea thus privately entertained by yourself in such efforts, I would not have you to be disturbed by the consideration that you have often appeared to yourself to be delivering a poor and wearisome discourse. For it may very well be the case that the matter has not so presented itself to the person whom you were trying to instruct, but that what you were uttering seemed to you to be unworthy of the ears of others, simply because it was your own earnest desire that tliere should be something better to listen to. Indeed with me, too, it is almost always the fact that my speech dis- pleases myself. For I am covetous of something better, the possession of wliiuh 1 frequently enjoy witliin me before I ' rccunium Dominicain. CHAP. II.] THOUGHTS AXD WOr.DS. 267 commence to body it forth in intelligible words ■} and then when my capacities of expression prove inferior to my inner apprehensions, I grieve over the inability which my tongue has betrayed in answering to my heart. For it is my wish that he who hears me should have the same complete under- standing of the subject which I have myself; and I perceive that I fail to speak in a manner calculated to effect that, and that this arises mainly from the circumstance that the intel- lectual apprehension diffuses itself through the mind with something like a rapid flash, whereas the utterance is slow, and occupies time, and is of a vastly different nature, so that, while this latter is moving on, the intellectual apprehension has already withdrawn itself within its secret abodes. Yet, in consequence of its having stamped certain impressions of itself in a marvellous manner upon the memory, these prints endure with the brief pauses of the syllables ; ^ and as the outcome of these same impressions we form intelligible signs,^ which get the name of a certain lanojuacfe, either the Latin, or the Greek, or the Hebrew, or some other. And these signs may be objects of thought, or they may also be actually uttered by the voice. On the other hand, however, the impressions themselves are neither Latin, nor Greek, nor Hebrew, nor peculiar to any other race whatsoever, but are made good in the mind just as looks are in the body. For anger is desig- nated by one word in Latin, by another in Greek, and by dif- ferent terms in other languages, acccording to their several diversities. But the look of the angry man is neither (pecu- liarly) Latin nor (peculiarly) Greek. Thus it is that when a person says Iratus sum^ he is not understood by every nation, but only by the Latins ; whereas, if the mood of his mind when it is kindling to wrath comes forth upon the face and affects the look, all who have the individual within their view understand that he is angry. But, again, it is not in our power to bring out those impressions which the intellectual apprehension stamps upon the memory, and to hold them forth, as it were, to the perception of the hearers by means of * Verbis sonantihus, — sounding words. 2 Perdurant ilia cum syllabarum nioiulis. ' Sonantia si'jna, — vocal signs. ■* I am angry. 2G8 ON CATECHISING. [CHAP. U. the sound of the voice, in any manner parallel to the clear and evident form in M'liich the look appears. For those former are witliin in the mind, while this latter is without in the body. Wherefore we have to surmise how far the sound of our mouth must be from representing that stroke of the intelligence, seeing that it does not correspond even with the impression produced upon the memory. Kow, it is a common occurrence with us tluit, in the ardent desire to effect what is of profit to our hearer, our aim is to express ourselves to him exactly as our intellectual apprehension is at the time, when, in the very effort, we are failing in the ability to speak; and then, because this does not succeed with us, we are vexed, and we pine in weariness as if we were applying ourselves to vain labours ; and, as the result of this very weariness, our dis- course becomes itself more languid and pointless even than it was when it first induced such a sense of tediousness. 4. But ofttimes the earnestness of those who are desirous of hearing me shows me that my utterance is not so frigid as it seems to myself to be. From the delight, too, whicli they exhibit, I gather that they derive some profit from it. And I occupy myself sedulously with the endeavour not to fail in putting before them a service in which I perceive them to take in such good part what is put before them. Even so, on your side also, the very fact that persons who require to be instructed in the faith are brought so frequently to you, ought to help you to understand that your discourse is not displeasing to others as it is displeasing to yourself; and you ought not to consider yourself unfruitful, simply because you do not succeed in setting forth in such a manner as you desire the things which you discern ; for, percliance, you may be just as little able to discern them in the way you wish. For in this life who sees except as "in an enigma and through a glass" ?^ Neither is love itself of miglit sullicient to rend the darkness oi the flesh, and penetrate into that eternal calm from which even things which pass away derive the light in which they shine. lUit inasmuch as day by day the good are making advances towards the vision of that day, independent of the rolling sky,*'' and without the invasion of the niglit, " which eye ^ 1 Cor. .\iii. 12. » Sine volumiue cjcli. CHAP. II.] SUBJECTS OF THE DISCOURSE. 269 liatli not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man,"-^ there is no greater reason why our discourse should become valueless in our own estimate, when we are engaged in teaching the uninstructed, than this, — namely, that it is a delight to us to discern in an extraordinary fashion, and a weariness to speak in an ordinary. And in reality we are listened to with much greater satisfaction, indeed, Avhen we ourselves also have pleasure in the same work ; for the thread of our address is affected by the very joy of which we ourselves are sensible, and it proceeds from us with greater ease and with more acceptance. Conse- quently, as regards those matters which are recommended as articles of belief, the task is not a difficult one to lay down injunctions, with respect to the points at which the narration should be commenced and ended, or with respect to the method in which the narration is to be varied, so that at one time it may be briefer, at another more lengthened, and yet at all times full and perfect ; and, again, with respect to the particular occasions on which it may be right to use the shorter form, and those on which it will be proper to employ the longer. But as to the means by which all is to be done, so that every one may have pleasure in his work when he catechises (for the better he succeeds in this the more attrac- tive will he be), — that is what requires the greatest considera- tion. And yet we have not far to seek for the precept which will rule in this sphere. For if, in the matter of carnal means, God loves a cheerful giver,^ how much more so in that of the spiritual ? But our security that this cheerfulness may be with us at the seasonable hour, is something dependent upon the mercy of Him who has given us such precepts. There- fore, in accordance with my understanding of what your own wish is, we shall discuss in the first place the subject of the method ot narration, then that of the duty of delivering in- junction and exhortation, and afterwards that of the attain- ment of the said cheerfulness, so far as God may furnish us with the ideas. 1 1 Cor. ii. 9. « 2 Cor. ix. 7. 270 ON CATECHISING. [CITAP. III. CuAP. III. — Of the full narration to be employed in catechising. 5. The naiTation is full when each person is catechised in the first instance from what is written in the text, " In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth," ^ on to the present times of the Church. This does not imply, however, either that we ought to repeat by memory the entije Penta- teuch, and the entire Books of Judges, and Kings, and Esdras,^ and the entire Gospel and Acts of the Apostles, if we have learned all these word for word ; or that we should put all the matters which are contained in these volumes into our own words, and in that manner unfold and expound them as a whole. For neither does the time admit of that, nor does any necessity demand it. But what we ought to do is, to give a comprehensive statement of all things, summarily and gene- rally, so that certain of the more wonderful facts may be selected which are listened to with superior gratification, and which have been ranked so remarkably among the exact turn- ing-points (of the history) f that, instead of exhibiting them to view only in their wrappings, if we may so speak, and then instantly snatching them from our siglit, we ought to dwell on them for a certain space, and thus, as it were, unfold them and open them out to vision, and present them to the minds of the hearers as things to be examined and admired. But as for all other details, these sliould be passed over rapidly, and thus far introduced and woven into the narrative. The effect of pursuing this plan is, that the particular facts wliich we wish to see specially commended to attention obtain greater prominence in consequence of the others being made to yield to them ; while, at the same time, neither does the learner, whose interest we are anxious to stimulate by our statement, come to these subjects witli a miiul already ex- hausted, nor is confusion induced upon the memory of tlie person whom we ought to be instructing by our teaching. 6. In all things, indeed, not only ought our own eye to be kept fixed uj)on tlie end of the commandment, whicli is " charity, out of a pure heart, and a good conscience, and faith • Gen. i. 1. ' In the Mss. we also fiml the reading EzrcF = Ezra. ^ In ipsiJi articulis^ *' amoi)'^ tlie very articles," or ** connecting link.s." Ke- fercnce is made to certain great epoclis or articles of time in sections 6 and 39. CHAP. III.] Jacob's bikth and Christ's ixcabxatiox. 271 unfeigned," ^ to which we should make all that we utter refer; but in like manner ought the gaze of the person whom w^e are instructing by our utterance to be moved ^ toward the same, and guided in that direction. And, in truth, for no other reason were all those things which w^e read in the Holy Scrip- tures written, previous to the Lord's advent, but for this, — namely, that His advent might.be pressed upon the attention, and that the Church which was to be, should be intimated beforehand, that is to say, the people of God throughout all nations ; which Church is His body, wherewith also are united and numbered all the saints who lived in this world, even before His advent, and who believed then in His future coming, just as we believe in His past coming. For (to use an illustration) Jacob, at the time when he was being born, first put forth from the womb a hand, with which also he held the foot of the brother who was taking priority of him in the act of birth: and next indeed the head followed, and thereafter, at last, and as matter of course, the rest of the members : ^ while, nevertheless, the head in point of dignity and power has pre- cedence, not only of those members which followed it then, but also of the very hand which anticipated it in the process of the birth, and is really the first, although not in the matter of the time of appearing, at least in the order of nature. And in an analogous manner, the Lord Jesus Christ, . previous to His appearing in the flesh, and coming forth in a certain manner out of the womb of His secrecy, before the eyes of men as Man, the Mediator between God and men,* " who is over all, God blessed for ever,"^ sent before Him, in the person of the holy patriarchs and prophets, a certain portion of His body, wherewith, as by a hand, He gave token beforetime of His own approaching birth, and also supplanted^ the people who were prior to Him in their pride, using for that purpose the bonds of the law, as if they were His five fingers. For 1 1 Tim. i. 5. - Reading movenclus, for which monendus = to be admonished, also occurs in the editions. 3 Gen. XXV. 26. * 1 Tim. ii. 5. ^ Rom. ix. 5. ® Reading supplantavit. Some Mss. give suppiantaret = wherewith also He might supplant, etc. 272 ON CATECHISING. [CIIAP. IV. through five epochs of times ^ there was no cessation in the foretelling and prophesying of His own destined coming ; and in a manner consonant with this, he through whom the law was given wrote five books ; and proud men, who were carnally minded, and sought to " establish their own righteousness," ^ were not filled with blessing by the open hand of Christ, but were debarred from such good by the hand compressed and closed ; and therefore their feet were tied, and " they fell, while we are risen, and stand upright." ^ But although, as I have said, the Lord Christ did thus send before Him a certain portion of His body, in the person of those holy men who came before Him as regards the time of birth, nevertheless He is Himself the Head of the body, the Church,** and all these have been attached to that same body of which He is the head, in virtue of their believing in Him whom they an- nounced prophetically. For they were not sundered (from that body) in consequence of fulfilling their course before Him, but rather were they made one with the same by reason of their obedience. For although the hand may be put forward away before the head, still it has its connection beneath the head. Wherefore all things which were written aforetime were written in order that we might be taught thereby,^ and were our figures, and happened in a figure in the case of these men. Moreover they were written for our sakes, upon whom the end of the ages has come.^ CiiAi'. IV. — That the great reason for the advent of Christ icas tJie commendation of love. 7. Moreover, what greater reason is apparent for the advent of the Lord than that God might show His love in us, com- mending it powerfully, inasmuch as "while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us"?^ And furthermore, this is with the intent that, inasmuch as charity is " the end of tlie commandment,"^ and " the fullilliiig of the law," ^ we also may love one another and lay down our life for the brethren, even as He laid down His life for us.^*^ And with regard to God Himself, its object ' T('mi)orum articulos. * Rom. x. 3. ' Ps. xx. 8. * Col. i. 18. ^ Kom. xv. 4. « 1 Cor. x. 11. 7 lloin. V. 8, 10. ^ 1 Tim. i. 5. ^ Kom. xiii. 10. 10 1 John iu, 16. CHAP. IV.] THE ACTION OF LOVE. is that, even if it were an irksome task to love Him, it may now at least cease to be irksome for us to return His love, seeing that " He first loved us," ^ and " spared not His own only Son, but delivered Him up for us all." '^ For there is no mightier invitation to love than to anticipate in loving ; and that soul is over hard which, supposing it unwilling indeed to give love, is unwilling also to give the return of love. But if, even in the case of criminal and sordid loves, w^e see how those who desire to be loved in return make it their special and absorbing business, by such proofs as are within their power, to render the strength of the love wdiich they themselves bear plain and patent ; if we also perceive how they affect to put forward an appearance of justice in what they thus offer, such as may qualify them in some sort to demand that a response be made in all fairness to them on the part of those souls which they are labouring to beguile ; if, further, their own passion burns more vehemently when they observe that the minds which they are eager to possess are also moved now by the same fire : if thus, I say, it happens at once that the soul which before was torpid is excited so soon as it feels itself to be loved, and that the soul which w^as enkindled already becomes the more in- flamed so soon as it is made cognisant of the return of its own love, it is evident that no greater reason is to be found why love should be either originated or enlarged, than what appears in the occasion when one who as yet loves not at all comes to know himself to be the object of love, or when one who is already a lover either hopes that he may yet be loved in turn, or has by this time the evidence of a response to his affection. And if this holds good even in the case of base loves, how much more ^ in (true) friendship ? For what else have we carefully to attend to in this question touching the injuring of friendship than to this, namely, not to give our friend cause to suppose either that we do not love him at all, or that we love him less than he loves us ? If, indeed, he is led to enter- tain this belief, he will be cooler in that love in which men enjoy the interchange of intimacies one with another ; and if 1 1 John iv. 10, 19. 2 p^o^. viii. 32. ^ Reading quanto plus, for wliicli some mss. give ^j/«?-