PRINCETON, N. J. BX 5199 .A9 S8 1821 Strype, John, 1643-1737. Historical collections of the life and acts of the Shelf Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/historicalcollecOOstry Jiorn about IS U Dit J Jun<- 3fl3f4 HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF THE LIFE AND ACTS OF THE RIGHT REVEREND FATHER IN GOD, JOHN AYLMER, LORD BP. OF LONDON IN THE REIGN OF QUEEN ELIZABETH. WHEREIN ARE EXPLAINED MANY TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND; AND WHAT METHODS WERE THEN TAKEN TO PRESERVE IT, WITH RESPECT BOTH TO THE PAPIST AND PURITAN. BY JOHN STRYPE, M. A. A NEW EDITION. OXFORD, AT THE CLARENDON PRESS. MDCCCXXI. TO THE HONOURABLE ADMIRAL AYLMER. SIR, Accept the Dedication of this Life of Bishop Aylmer. For to what other name may it more justly belong than yours? Not only in that you both are sprung from the same ancient family, but by reason of your high and deserved advancements : he, by his Prince placed in one of the chiefest trusts in the Church ; you, by yours in as great and honourable a charge in the Navy. In which you have not only been successful, by bringing home in safety the Turkey fleet in the midst of war, and a sea full of enemies laying wait for you, but since by cutting [or agreeing] for the redemp- tion of his Majesty's subjects, lying for many years in a most miserable slavery under the Emperor of Morocco ; and have gained other advantages, both for the honour and trade of England; as may be seen in the Articles confirmed by you with the governments of Tunis and Tripoli. But you, Sir, had rather do great services, than hear of them, and receive the praises due for them. And therefore I stop my pen from proceeding any farther in this argument. Sir, that you may still live, and be the instrument a iv EPISTLE DEDICATORY. of much more good to the King and kingdom, may I presume to be your monitor? Remember from whose hands all your successes and honours flow ; acknowledge Him, and let Him have the glory. The crest and motto belonging to the other branch of your family may be your remembrancer : which is, three flourishing slips of the plant allelujah, (as herbalists call the trijolium acetosum,) and a scroll compassing the same, with the word Allelujah, which signifies, Praise the Lord: let that, Sir, (which is their motto,) be your practice. To conclude, if you shall please at your leisure minutes to read over these Historical Collections concerning this Prelate your namesake, (as history is the mistress and instructor of life,) whatsoever you find praiseworthy in him, follow. Follow what- soever you observe in him springing from the noble principles of religion, conscience, and true magnani- mity, and let them ever live and flourish in the house of the Aylmers : with which wish and prayer I end this address, being, Sir, Your most humble Servant, JOHN STRYPE. THE PREFACE. To give some account of my doings in publishing this piece, let me premise a few things. I confess I have beef) led, by a strong propension of mind, to make inquiry into the ecclesiastic affairs of this kingdom, happening especially in the last century of years but one, (namely, that called the sceculum reformatum,) when the state of religion un- derwent so great a change in Europe, and particularly in England. And that I might herein be profitable to others as well as to myself, I have been willing to communicate what I have collected and discovered out of various re- cords and archives, as well as other old cast-by printed tracts ; this kind of history, especially along through the reign of Queen Elizabeth, being very sparingly hitherto made known to us. And because the hinges of public affairs have chiefly turned on the management of those in eminent places and offices, Biography may deservedly require its place in his- tory : I have had a great respect to it in the collections I have made ; taking due notice of all such persons as have made a figure either in the Church or State, and observing as much as I coidd of their acts and characters ; especially of such whose aims and pursuits have been just and honour- able. Of such I have had a mind to revive the memory, and retrieve their names from being lost in perpetual obli- vion, by drawing up some accounts of them, taken out of their own letters and papers, or elsewhere; intending to offer some of them to the present age : a thing due to wor- a 2 VI THE PREFACE. thy men, that their names and good works may never die, nor be forgotten. And as it is a piece of justice to them, so of considerable benefit to us in this age ; the contemplat- ing of their lives being like to prove of very good use to those that have the skill to gather lessons of prudence and conduct in human life from them. I may add, the pleasure and satisfaction that is commonly taken in relations and his- tories of persons of rank and eminence that liv ed in former times. It hath somewhat very acceptable and agreeable in it, as there is in seeing the lively portraitures or statues of such as have been great Statesmen or learned Ecclesiastics, being the usual ornament of the galleries of noblemen's houses: though those could but represent the outward shape, and not the minds and deeds, as history can and doth. What flocking is there when an ambassador or a great man is to be seen ! Many put themselves to the ex- penses of travelling abroad, chiefly to see the faces of for- tunate princes, or to be acquainted with profound scholars, or men of some other great figure. And what inquiries do they make into their manners, opinions, and factions ! Which shews what a delight mankind usually takes in the know- ledge of men, whose dignities or employments have distin- guished them from the inferior rank. I have in this book shewn to the world one of these sin- gular men, viz. Queen Elizabeth's third Bishop of London. Within whose diocese lay both the Court, Westminster Hall, and London, the great metropolis of the nation : and by whom the Archbishop of Canterbury passed all his injunc- tions and mandates to the rest of the Bishops and Clergy of his province. And therefore we may reasonably look for mat- ters of great moment to be occasionally recommended to this Bishop in this busy reign, and to fall into the accounts we give of him. If it be asked why I do not rather begin with Grindal and Sandys, this Bishop's two immediate predecessors in the said see of London ; it is enough to answer at present, that the one being afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, and the other of York, it may be more proper to treat of THE PREFACE. \ ii them (as perhaps in due time I may) under the denomina- tions of the sees whereof they were possessed when they died. In what I have writ, I have endeavoured invariably to follow the tract of truth, and have related things as I found them. I may perhaps be censured for this plain and im- partial way of writing, and blamed, that I have not put some veil or varnish upon some things, and been wholly silent of others, which might reflect some blemish upon the man I write of. In truth, I make no scruple to express the defects and failings of men, as well as their excellent qualities and praiseworthy deeds. We are not writing a panegyric, but a faithful account. A sober reader might justly misdoubt the whole, when all is praise, and every passage of the life is represented as coming up to the per- fect and commensurate rule of justice, virtue, and honour. And herein I follow a good historian, (Morison, Secretary to the Lord Mountjoy, sometime Lord Deputy of Ireland,) who, undertaking to write his Lord and Master's acts, bids his reader confidently to believe, " that as in the duty of " a servant he would not omit any thing he remembered, " which might turn to his Lord's honour; so, in his love " to truth, he would be so far from lying and flattery, as " he would rather be bold modestly to mention some of his " defects, whereof the greatest worthiness of the world can- " not be altogether free. 11 Adding, that "as he esteemed ly- " ing and flattery by word of mouth among the living to be in- " fallible notes of baseness and ignorance, so he judged these " vices infamous and sinful, when they were left in print to " deceive posterity. 11 And as for the errors in good men's lives, it suffices to say, that we are not angels in this state of mortality, and men will be men, as Archbishop Parker used to say. The best have their imperfections ; and there have been many singular useful men, whose passions or other temptations have made them sometimes to deviate and go aside ; and yet may their names stand fair, and their examples be recommended to posterity. Some slips and failings perhaps we may find in this Bishop in reading a3 viii THE PREFACE. his history : which his public spirit, his zeal for the Pro- testant religion, his learning, his steady and careful govern- ment, and other singular accomplishments, wall abundantly atone. But whereas a great many charges and criminations of a fouler nature were cast upon him, they will prove but the uncharitable and angry slanders of his enemies, the in- novators, whom he neither, favoured nor spared. And, in justice to the memory of a great Father of our Church, I have endeavoured to vindicate and clear his name from such impudent calumniations and picked-up stories, as are in Martin Marprelate, and some other malicious scribblers in those times. But to prevent the objection of some, who do not like this age's practice, of burdening the world, as they call it, with such abundance of needless and frivolous books, let me add to what I have already said concerning the reason of my setting forth this piece, that (besides the life and acts of a single man, that, dying above an hundred years ago, the present generation is not much concerned for) it contains in it matter of more public concern. For there fall in with it many transactions in the Church ; as the pro- ceedings of the Commission for ecclesiastical causes ; parti- cular relations what grounds and interests both Papistry, and that which was termed Puritanism and Separatism got; how the State was awaked with these things; what orders came down, and what prosecutions thereupon; the state of the Clergy of London and the diocese ; matters dis- covered in visitations ; things not yet taken notice of in our histories, but rather declined and purposely omitted. Cam- den, our best historian for these times, lightly toucheth at matters of this nature, professing to leave them to the eccle- siastical historian. Notices and characters are here likewise given of divers remarkable persons then living both in the Church and State, as, namely, the faithful, the just, and wise Lord Treasurer Burghley, the great favourite the Earl of Lei- cester, the diligent Secretary Walsingham, the truly learned and experienced Secretary Wylson, and other Statesmen ; THE PREFACE. divers Archbishops and Bishops, and other eminent Church- men, viz. Parker, Grindal, Whitgift, Sandys, Cox, Nowell, Goodman, Fox ; many of the chief Papists, Feckenham,W at- son, Meridith, Allen, Campion ; and Puritans, as Whright, Chark, Field, Wilcox, Carew, Giffard, Cartwright, Cavvdry, Barrow, Greenwood, and others of that rank. Which things, when duly considered, may render this book of public use and advantage, though the argument of it be more private, and relate chiefly to one man. Should any be desirous to know upon what foot of truth I stand, and what authority I have for what I have written, I acknowledge the demand to be very reasonable, and I shall freely declare what notes I have made use of, and whence I have gathered my materials. In general, I have been furnished from authentic registers and records, from original letters and other MSS. some lying in public ar- chives, and others in more private libraries. Some help also I have had from certain old tracts and pamphlets printed in those times. But to be more particular, (for this perhaps may give a satisfaction to some more inquisitive persons,) at the end of this book I have set down a cata- logue of the manuscripts, together with the other ancient printed treatises, both that I have made use of, and that are mentioned in the history. And here I cannot but take this occasion publicly to acknowledge my singular obligations to divers reverend and honourable persons, who have granted me the liberty of consulting very valuable papers in their possession or custody. Among these is the right honourable and learned Sir Joseph Williamson ; who, after my requests of being admitted into the Paper Office had been made known unto him by the favour of the most reverend Father in Christ the present Archbishop of Canterbury, allowed me to take a view of the ecclesiastical papers there; and afterward, by a warrant from the most honourable the King's Privy Council, with the same obliging readiness, to take copies of divers of them for my use, in the compiling an ecclesiastical history under my hands; whereby I was furnished with a 4 X THE PREFACE. some things for my present purpose. By the favour also of my right honourable and right reverend Diocesan Henry Lord Bishop of London, I have had access to the Registry of the Bishops of London: where I was kindly received and directed by Mr. Alexander, the Deputy Re- gister. The right reverend the Lord Bishop of Nor- wich, the possessor of a great and curious collection of MSS. and other ancient printed pieces, (little inferior to MSS. in regard of their scarceness,) hath also been very considerably assistant to me, as well in this present work, as in others, by that free leave, nay, and invitation, he hath given me to peruse, and make transcriptions out of am of them. Nor do I forget the obliging readiness of Sir Henry St. George Clarent. King at Arms, with others belonging unto the noble Office of Heralds ; who with all willingness afforded me the use of their books, in order to the searching for the family and pedigree of our Bishop, as well as for divers other things, serviceable to some purposes I have in hand. And this at length is the sum of what I had to say to the reader ; praying him, in case he discovers any slips or over- sights, to pardon them to one who looks upon himself as a frail and fallible man, and is apt enough to have mean con- ceits of his own performances, and very ready to be set right, and thankful to be instructed, as well as willing to contribute his talent to instruct others. And thus I bid the reader farewell. J. S. From Low Leyton in Essex, February 6, 1700. THE CONTENTS OF THE HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF THE RIGHT REV. BP. AYLMER'S LIFE ; TOGETHER WITH THE CHRONOLOGY. CHAP. I. The Bishop's birth, education and preferments, exile and return. Made Archdeacon of Lincoln. P. 1. The name of Aylmer. His extract and birth. His education, ^nn. 1521. Tutor to the Lady Jane Grey. Her proficiency under him. 1553, Aylmer's character when young. Reckoned amongst the best x 559] and politest wits. Studies divinity. Becomes Archdeacon of 1562 - Stow. Flies abroad for his religion. Instructs youth in his 1573] exile. Publisheth the Lady Jane's letter. Assists Mr. Fox the 1573 - Martyrologist. Aylmer a severe critic. Aylmer at Zurich. Ad- viseth to invite Peter Martyr to read at Frankfort. He tra- vels. Prints a book at Strasburgh against Knox. Engaged in a disputation. Made Archdeacon of Lincoln. Present at the Synod anno 1562. Writes to the Archbishop concerning old books at Lincoln. Sticks at Lincoln. Justice of the Peace, and in the ecclesiastical Commission there. His usefulness. Becomes Dr. of Divinity. Moved by the Archbishop to an- swer a certain book. A controversy between the Archdeacon and Bishop of Lincoln decided. xii CONTENTS CHAP. n. He is preferred to the see of London. His cares in that function : chiefly about Papists. Visits his diocese. Preaches often. P. 16. A "° , 7 1 8 576 - Why neglected so long. The Archbishop's character of him. Made Bishop of London. Contest between Aylraer and bis pre- decessor Sandys. Archbishop Sandys's plea. The kindness of his predecessor. His confirmation and consecration. His re- quest to the Queen. His primary visitation. His expenses. Preaches frequently. His main endeavour. His first ordina- tion. Discovers a Popish Priest. His apprehensions of Spain. His advice to the Lord Treasurer concerning Papists. Orders for Papists in prison. A secret letter to the Bishop concerning them. Thimbletborp. The Bishop an enemy to Papists. Writes to John Fox. His care about the plague in London. Discovers Carter, a Popish printer. Removes Pond to his prison at Stort- ford. CHAP. III. His farther dealing with Papists. Campion's book. P. 31. Ann. 1581. Campion's book. The Bishop wished to answer it. His judgment of Protestant writers. His advice to the Lord Trea- surer. Persons by him nominated for answering the Popish book. His reflections upon Campion's book. The Bishop not for disputing. The Papists boast. CHAP. IV. His dealing with the Puritans. His advice concerning the University. His trouble about felling his woods. P. 36. Ann. 1577. Puritans. His opinion of some of them; and advice con- — 1580. cerning them. Imprisons a bookseller. One of the Clergy of Lincoln dedicates a book to him. One Welderi abuses the Bi- shop. Complains of it. A book against the Queen's marriage with Monsieur : occasions the Bishop suddenly to summon the London Clergy. Andreas Jacobus. The ubiquitarian contro- versy. Admonishes his Clergy about the Queen. The Min- isters of London now often cited. Articles of inquiry. Other Articles, by virtue of the Council's letters. Orders for the Clergy. Another call of the Ministers. Another. His advice AND CHRONOLOGY. Mil concerning the University. Licence for keeping and looking to hearses at funerals. Commissions, Sir Julius Caesar. Troubled about felling his woods. Writes to the Lord Treasurer about it. His defence of himself. Forbid to fell any more of his woods. Endeavours a commission for dilapidations. His let- ters to the Secretary. He sues the Archbishop of York. The charge of the dilapidations CHAP. V. An earthquake occasions the Bishop to compose certain prayers. He visits. His business with the Lord Rich. His device about appointment of preachers. His coun- sel for rilling the see of Bath and Wells, and other sees. P. 51. An earthquake. Frames prayers for this occasion. A visita- Ann - t5S0 * tion. Articles to be inquired of. Chiefly forPapists. City Ministers cited again. And again. Contends with the Lord Rich, a Pu- ritan. Wright his preacher. They come before the Commis- sion ecclesiastical. Writes to the Queen concerning his doings. Wright offers a subscription. His device for preachers. His grave advice for supplying vacant sees. His letter to the Trea- surer for that purpose. CHAP. VI. The Bishop's care about the Commission. Labours a re- move to Ely. P. 60. Several punished for inconformity. Complains of some Com- Ann. 1 58 1 . missioners that absented. Apparitors employed on Sundays. The Lord Treasurer sends cautions to the Bishop. His answer thereupon. The Bishop the great stay of the Commission. The success of his pains. Meets with troubles at Court. Labours a remove. He hath the grant of Ely. Solicits his remove to Ely. Solicits again the next year. Fed with hope. Troubled again by informers. The elms in Fulham. The Queen lodges at Fulham. CHAP. VII. The Bishop celebrates the 17th of November. Slandered. Papists have mass in prison. Goes his visitation. Sus- pends one Huckle. Suit with his predecessor for dilapi- dations. Thomas Cartwright taken up. P. 68. The Queen's dav solemnized at Paul's. His enemies slander Ann - 1583 - J —1586. Xiv CONTENTS him. His request hereupon. Papists in prison pervert many. Visits. Complaints of commutation of penance. His advice for the reforming thereof. Silenceth a dangerous Minister. Another suspended by him, viz. George Giffard, Minister of Maiden. Restored. Suspended again. A large testimonial of him by his auditors. Giffard wrote against Barrow the Sepa- ratist. Casts Archbishop Sandys for dilapidations. His reasons against a new commission for examination of the matter. The Bishop desires the judgment of the Judges concerning certain Papists. Vauce, a Popish Priest. Takes up Cartwright the Puritan. The Queen offended with the Bishop. Charged un- justly to have spoiled the bishopric. A controversy between the Queen and him about a vicarage. A Presbytery set up at Hatfield. Enormities and strange doctrines of their preacher. His dealing at Hatfield. Composes a prayer for a present occa- sion. The Bishop endeavours to pacify the citizens concerning the strangers. Holds a visitation. Visits in London. Goes into Essex. A strange rudeness intended against the Bishop at Maiden. Goes to Wickham. Dr. Aylmer, Archdeacon. Visits. CHAP. VIII. Cawdry's case: who was deprived, and deposed from the ministry. P. 84. Ann. 1587. Cawdry of Luffenham cited before the Commission. The 1591. Bishop deprives him. Cawdry refuses to submit to the sen- tence. His lawyer's arguments. James Morice his lawyer. Cawdry vindicates his abilities in learning. Urges his using the Common Prayer. The reason of his sentence. Which he would not abide by : and why. His letter to the Lord Burghley. Offers some kind of submission : but will not recant publicly. Appears at Lambeth. Degraded and deposed. The Bishop of Peterborough sequesters his living. Cawdry sues in the Star- chamber. The Lord Burghley recommends his case to the Bi- shop of London. The Bishop's letter to the said Lord. Caw- dry's counsellor's angry advice. Dr. Aubrey's judgment of the case. The statute urged by Cawdry's counsel. Offered to be restored to his ministry upon subscription. CHAP. IX. The Bishop's contest with one Maddocks. Smith the preacher at St. Clement's suspended. A visitation. Dyke, AND CHRONOLOGY. xv of St. Alban's, forbid preaching. Cartwright the Pu- ritan. Sir Denys Roghan, an Irish Priest. The see of Oxford void. P. 97. The occasion of a contest between the Bishop and Maddocks. Ann. 1588. Maddocks complains to the Council. The Bishop relates the 1590 ' case. Maddocks submits. Smith, Lecturer of St. Clement's. 159 2 - Greehham's account of him to the Lord Treasurer. The Bishop suspends him. The reasons why. His answer to them. Cer- tain of the parish sue to the Lord Burghley for Smith to be their Minister. An abusive book against the King of Spain. The Bishop sent unto, to find the printer. Visits. Suspends Dyke of St. Alban's. Gives his reasons for so doing. Cartwright in the Fleet appears before the Bishop : who expostulates with him. The Bishop's house vexed with an Irish Priest. Sues to be rid of him. Who this Irishman was. His informations to the Council ; and advice. But proves a right Irishman. The Bishop commends certain for the see of Oxford. Desirous to resign. CHAP. X. The Bishop's last visitation. His death. His burial. His last will. His children and posterity. P. 112. His last visitation. Departs this life. His estate. His last Ann. 1592. will. His wife and children. His eldest son, Samuel. Dr. — 1594 ' Aylmer, his second son. Some character of him. Some farther character of Dr. Aylmer. His charity. Humble and mortified. His preparation for death. The Bishop's third son, John. His fourth, fifth, and seventh sons. Tobel, his sixth son. His daughters. Dr. Squire, the Bishop's son-in-law. Squire a pro- digal. The Bishop's letter to the Lord Treasurer concerning Squire. The Bishop's name and family. George Aylmer one of the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. The Bishop's house- keeping and expenses. His purchase. His dilapidations : for which Bishop Bancroft sues his son and heir. CHAP. XI. Some observations upon Bishop Aylmer. Certain things charged upon him cleared. The Lord Burghley his friend. P. 129. A review taken of the Bishop. Faults charged upon him. xvi CONTENTS Wronging the see by felling the wood. Charged for his licences for marriage. Faculties. Old Sir Roger. Charged again for disorders in Essex. Desires to be heard by the Queen. Mar- prelate's slanders of the Bishop. Detaining stolen goods. Wronging his grocer. Keeping one in the Clink. Ordaining his porter. These calumnies wiped off. The business between the Bishop and the diers ; and the executors of Allen his grocer. Benison's business. His charge of making his porter a Min- ister, cleared. Other calumnies. Bowling on the sabbath. His friends. Lord Treasurer Burghley. CHAP. XII. His great abilities in learning. His disputation. Writings. A logician : an historian : an hebrician : a civilian. P. 145. His debates in Queen Mary's Convocation: concerning the sense of ov- •> _ shop con- to Archbishop Parker, who had sent to him to make in- cerning old quiry for ancient historical writings in that cathedral, or^"^,^ other libraries in those parts. Mr. Aylmer accordingly made search, but after all could give him no satisfaction in that point, the libraries thereabouts consisting chiefly of old schoolmen. But among his own books he found one writ- ten by one of the Archbishop's predecessors upon the Old Testament, which Aylmer promised to send up to him : in fine, expressing his joy, that God had chosen the chief Pas- tor of this church out of his native country, meaning Nor- folk. Here at Lincoln he stuck a long while, though he was Sticks at often nominated by the Archbishop of Canterbury, his Lmcoln ~ countryman and friend, as occasion served, to succeed to some vacant bishopric. But the Archbishop had enemies at the Court, that commonly thwarted what he recommended and advised. But that he remained yet in statu quo with- out higher preferment, many passed their conjectures. That party of men that did not much favour the Bishops, nor like the divine worship established by law, made his book against Knox one of the causes that he had so many back friends, that employed their interest against his rising ; be- cause perhaps they thought he had in that book too much advanced the power and authority of princes, which Knox had so lessened and disparaged. For to this, it seems, that expression tended, of one Norton, a Minister, in a letter to Dr. Whitgift, wrote anno 1572; where advising the said Whitgift to forbear answering Cartwright the Puritan's book, that Protestants might not give an entertainment to 14 THE LIFE OF chap, the enemies of religion, by falling into controversies among l ' themselves; and as though Whitgiffs secret intention by his writing in this quarrel was, to stand the fairer for pre- ferment ; to this, I say, tended that expression of his con- cerning Aylmer ; (as though Whitgift should take example by him ;) " Mr. Aylmer's unseasonable paradox to truth " hath hurt the Church, and yet not advanced his prefer- " ment so much as he hoped." But Whitgift, in his an- swer to Norton's letter, gave a better interpretation both of himself and Aylmer, and their intentions in what they MSS. D. wrote ; saying, " That Mr. Aylmer's doctrine was neither ty"' Armlg. " unseasonable, nor yet a paradox ; but a common true re- " ceived opinion, grounded on the express words of the Scrip- " ture, and received without doubt of all learned writers, " both old and new, and in most seasonable time taught, " men's minds and hearts being so far from due obedience, " and so inclinable to the contrary. And I am fully satis- " fled, - " added he, " concerning our Divine, that he had all " the advancement that he looked for ; and that it was great " lack of charity to judge men to do that for advancement, " which they did of conscience and duty." justice of However Mr. Aylmer lived in great reputation, and was IndTnThe one °f tne Queen's Justices of the Peace for the county, ecclesiasti- an( j one D f ner ecclesiastical Commissioners ; being an active mission. and bold man, as well as wise and learned. His useful- Here in short, as his office led him, he first purged the ness " cathedral church of Lincoln, being at that time a nest of unclean birds; and next in the county, by preaching and executing the commission, he so prevailed, that not one re- cusant was left in the country at his coming away; and many years after it remained a diocese well settled in reli- gion ; as he mentioned himself in one of his letters to the Lord Treasurer. BecomesDr., And in the year 1573, having contented himself hitherto of Divinity. w j t jj fa e (\ e g Tee on ] v G f Master of Arts, he accumulated his degrees in divinity, being made Bachelor in Divinity and Doctor in Divinity in one day, in the University of Ox- ford. BISHOP AYLMER. IS The next year a book De Disciplina coming forth in CHAT. Latin, which struck at the present ecclesiastical government, . and aimed to overthrow the constitution of the Church of ^ ov ^ d h ^ England, the Archbishop of Canterbury made choice of bishop to Dr. Aylmer, of all other divines, to take this book in hand, *" o ^ er a and confute it ; and withal sent him the tract. But though he kept the book a good while by him, yet he refused to do it, writing back to the Archbishop, that he could not deal therein: which perhaps may be attributed to his discon- tent. But the Archbishop got it answered by another hand soon after. Grindal also, then Archbishop of York, re- puted Aylmer the fittest for this work, but concluded that he would not take the pains; having other employments probably lying upon his hands. There had been for some time great question moved be- A ">ntro- . 1 versy be- tween our Archdeacon and the Bishop of Lincoln, concern- tween the ing the exercise of the spiritual and ecclesiastical jurisdic-^^™^" tion within the Archdeaconry of Lincoln ; about which they decided, had been at law together, for asserting their distinct rights in the said jurisdiction. But in the year 1 572 it came to an happy conclusion by the arbitration of Matthew Arch- bishop of Canterbury, and Robert Bishop of Winton; both parties, for the sake of peace and concord, leaving their respective rights to be finally determined by those grave fathers 1 discretion ; and promising during their lives to stand by their decision. Hereupon they ordered and decreed, that both the Bishop and Archdeacon should hold their courts weekly together jointly in some place in the cathedral of Lincoln, or in the city ; and so hear and deter- mine causes, receive and admit the proofs of wills, commit the administration of goods of such as died intestate, and exercise all other ecclesiastical jurisdiction, except collation to benefices, admissions and institutions of clerks presented to the benefices of the said archdeaconry; which only be- longed to the Bishop and his Vicar General. They decided also, that the fees, profits, commodities, and emoluments re- sulting thence, should be divided between them ; but that in the Bishop's triennial visitations, he should take to him- 16 THE LIFE OF CHAP, self all the profits arising from the proving of wills, commis- ' sions, administration of goods of intestate persons deceased, for three months, that is, for one month before, and two months after such visitation begun ; the Archdeacon more- over paying the Bishop thirty-three pounds per annum. CHAP. II. He is preferred to the see of London. Hit cares in that function; chiefly about Papists. Visit* his diocese. Preaches often. Why neg- Among the reasons why Ayhrier all this while of the long.'' tl US Queen's reign was not yet advanced to a bishopric, (for his learning, conduct, and great abilities deserved it,) one we may conclude to be, that in his book before mentioned he de- claimed against the splendour and wealth of that order, and spake with some seeming spite against the civil authority of Bishops ; which made many gather that he stood not well affected to the calling itself. But in truth he was no enemy to the calling, but to that domineering tyranny that had been exercised by Bishops under the Papal usurpation. However he used now and then to be twitted in the teeth for it long after. In the year 1569, when Grindal, Bishop of London, was to be removed to York, the Archbishop would fain have brought him in to succeed there, and recom- mended him in that behalf to the Earl of Leicester, the Queen's great favourite. But he thought the Queen would object against him for this preferment, as too great a step from an archdeaconry to one of the chiefest bishoprics in England. But when Aylmer's name was talked of at Court, The Arch- the Archbishop took occasion to give the Secretary his bishop's judgment of him; namely, "that he would be very fit to character of-' » J . J him. " succeed m London, being a busy government, and so " much pestered with Papists, the Queen's mortal enemies; BISHOP AYLMER. 17 " and lie would prove a careful and active Bishop to watch CHAP. " the sheep against them. In fine, he signified to him, that " he thought verily, that the Queen would have a good, " fast, earnest servitor of this man. 11 All this took not ef- fect, and Aylmer was waved for this turn, and Dr. Sandys, Bishop of W orcester, was translated to London. But at last, in the year 1576, he was preferred to be Bi-Made Bi- shop of London, uj)on Sandys's removal from that see to^^on York ; who, in his farewell sermon at Paul's Cross, had sandys's these words concerning him ; " My hope is, that the Lord se ^„, " hath provided one of choice to be placed over you ; a " man to undertake this great charge, so well enabled for " strength, courage, great wisdom, skill in government, " knowledge, as in many other things, so especially in the " heavenly mysteries of God, that I doubt not but my de- " parture shall turn very much to your advantage. 11 Yet between these two reverend and grave Bishops hap- Contest be- pened some sharp difference, who before were very good n * e e r *° friends, and had been fellow-exiles. For Aylmer, who sue- Bishop, and ceeded Sandys in this see of London, required, as his d Ue, cessor. the whole incomes and benefits of the bishopric for the last half-year, that is, from Michaelmas to Lady-day, though Sandys continued Bishop of London the best part of that time, namely, till Candlemas, before his remove to York. Both of them appealed to the Lord Treasurer. Aylmer PaperOffice. shewed him, by a note in writing, the present commodities growing to the Archbishop of York upon his entrance : as, for the Lady-day rent 500/. his demeans 400/. a bene- volence of his Clergy 800/. besides woods to the value of 3000/. And this, he said, was a true rate, and would be avowed by those that were privy to the estate of the see of York. Concluding hence that my Lord of York had no reason to detain any part of the revenues of London from the last Michaelmas, being so well left at York ; and he coming so naked now to the see of London. The Archbishop, on the other hand, shewed the Trea- Archbishop surer, that the first sum mentioned was more by a great deal p^ dys * than in truth it was : and perhaps some part of the tenths c 18 THE LIFE OF CHAP, would be required of him : that as for the benevolence of ' the Clergy, it would be two years before that would be re- ceived: that the Bishop of London had as much woods left in his diocese : and if he, the Archbishop, might sell his woods at once, as Aylmer seemed to insinuate, he might do the same with his. He urged also, that he had served in London until the beginning of February, as Bishop, and received the rents of the see, according to equity and law : that the sum of what he received was small, and in that time he spent 1000/. and upward ; the present Bishop of London having been at no cost, neither serving the bishop- ric : and that he received of the Queen's gift 397/. enjoying likewise the revenues of his other livings to that time. He added, that there was no example that he should make any restitution of what he had received to his successor ; neither Bishop Yong, nor the late Bishop Grindal his predecessor, having been so dealt withal, but enjoyed all that they had received. And therefore he proceeded to charge his succes- sor with ingratitude ; that so soon as he [the Archbishop] had holpen him on with his rochet, he was transformed, and shewed himself void of that temper he pretended before : and with envy, in that by the note beforementioned of the Archbishop's revenues, he laboured to hinder the Queen from shewing him further favour; and setting forth the commodities of the see of York for a melius inquirendum. And in fine concluded pretty severely upon the Bishop, charging him with " coloured covetousness, and an envious " heart covered with the coat of dissimulation;' 1 '' words perhaps wherein the Archbishop was too much led by his passion. How this business was compromised I cannot tell : but it may be observed what disagreements meum and tuum will create even among good men and brethren. But a greater and a longer difference (such is the frailty of men) happened between them upon the account of dilapidations, as we shall see afterwards. The kind- The truth is, his predecessor Sandys was instrumental in predecessor. m s advancement to the see, recommending him to the Queen, as a very fit person to succeed him. When Aylmer BISHOP AYLMER 10 came up, he courteously entertained him at his house, and CHAP, upon his desire assisted at his consecration ; and when he ll ' departed to York, left several things in the houses belong- ing to the bishopric for his use and benefit: which kind- nesses so obliged the new Bishop, that as he promised the Archbishop, a little before his consecration, that he would never demand any thing for dilapidations ; so a little after, that he would be contented to take 100?. in full satis- faction for them. But notwithstanding these friendly be- ginnings, the process was more tragical, and to be la- mented. His election to London was confirmed March 22, 1576, His c °"- in Bow church, before Thomas Yale, LL. D. the Arch- an d conse- bishop of Canterbury's Vicar General ; and one Lane, his cratl0n - Proctor, took the oath in the Bishop elect's name. On Sun- day following, March 24, he was consecrated in Lambeth chapel by the Archbishop, assisted by Edwin Archbishop of York, and John Bishop of Rochester ; George Row and Thomas Blage, Chaplains to the Archbishop, and others being present. The Bishop soon after caused a view to be taken of the Diiapida- dilapidations of the bishopric; which stood thus. The re- 1 ' 0 " 5 " paration of the palace of London amounted to 509/. 7s. 6d. of St. Paul's church, 309/. of Fulham, 159/. 18*. lOd. of Hadham, 147/. 15*. 9d. of Wickham, 46/. 8*. 4c?. of Dun- mow, Wickham, Fering, Cressing, [chancels of those churches, as appears in another paper,] 34/. 16s. 8d. For all which his predecessor must ere long be called to account. The reverend man was well aware into what a ticklish His request station he was entering, and what back-friends he was like to meet with in the conscientious discharge of his duty: and therefore when he made his address to the Queen, to pay her his duty, and to receive her commands, among other things, he requested of her, that in case any hereafter might accuse him of any misdemeanour, she would suspend her be- lief until he were first heard, and that she would permit him to be brought unto his answer. And this she promised him graciouslv. c 2 20 THE LIFE OF CHAP. The Bishop began his primary visitation in London, De- cember 17, 1577, when subscription was urged ; and as His primary many did subscribe, so some refused; who called the sub- scribers dissemblers for their simple subscription : nav, and very uncharitably compared them to Arians, Priscillians, Anabaptists, and such like. And not only so, but they flouted and mocked them ; as Earl, one of these subscribing In Bibiiotb. Ministers, in a journal of his yet extant, records it. " Where- Ep. Norvic. " as >" writes he, " all that we say to them is, that we are " sorry for them, but cannot help them. 11 At this visitation the Bishop discovered (and perhaps among the Clergy) a Mass-Priest, a conjurer, and a semi- nary reconciler : of whom we shall hear by and by. His ex- The expenses of his first year, what with first-fruits and penses. divers other necessary disbursements, were such, as he could not spend above 500Z. that year, and scarcely that : how- ever, he came rich and well to pass to the bishopric. Preaches He preached very frequently in his cathedral church ; frequently. an( j a no table art of winning the ears and attention of his auditors. As once when he perceived those about him not so attentive as they ought to have been to what he was teaching, he presently fell to reading the Hebrew Bible : which he did so long, that all his drowsy auditors gazed at him, as amazed that he should entertain them so unprofit- ably, in such unknown language. But when he perceived them all thoroughly awake and very attentive, then he went on with his sermon, after he had given them this grave reprimand ; how it reflected upon their wisdom, that in mat- ters of mere novelty, and when they understood not a word, they should be wakeful, and listen so heedfully, but in the mean time to be ready to fall asleep, and give so little attention and regard, while he was preaching to them the weighty matters that concerned their everlasting salvation. At another solemn audience in the Parliament time at Paul's Cross, where were present a great many noblemen and persons of quality, that he might speak aptly to them, and excite them to evangelical virtue and true religion, and a serious regard of piety, he set before them the pattern of BISHOP AVLMEIt. 21 Sir Thomas More, sometime Privy Counsellor to King CHAP. Henry VIII. and Lord High Chancellor of England ; " a IL " man for his zeal to be honoured," said the Bishop, " though " for his religion to be abhorred shewing them, how he would divers times put on a surplice, and help the Priest in his proper person to say service. Insomuch that on a time at Chelsea the Duke of Norfolk came to him, being then Lord Chancellor, about some special affairs, and being informed that he was at church went thither. In the end of the service the Duke and Sir Thomas met, and after salutations, the Duke said, " What ! my Lord Chancellor " become a parish clerk ? What will the King's Majesty say " to this jeer, when he shall understand that his Lord Chan- " cellor of England, a special person of the realm, and in the " highest room of honour in the land next the Prince, is be- " come a parish clerk ?" To which Sir Thomas replied, "that " he thought and verily believed, that his Highness would be " so far from misdeeming or misliking him herein, that on the " contrary, when he should hear of the care which he had " to serve both his Master and mine, 1 ' 1 said he, " he will the " rather take me for a faithful servant." This passage the Bishop applied to the present occasion, that when the Par- liament were sitting and consulting about the national af- fairs, their first care should be to serve God themselves, and have a regard to his honour. As soon as he entered upon his episcopal function, he His main made it his main business to preserve the Church in the endeavour state in which it was established by the laws of the land, in respect both of the doctrine and discipline of it ; and there- fore thought it his duty to restrain both Papist and Puritan; botli which laboured to overthrow the constitution of reli- gion, as it was purged and reformed in the beginning of the Protestant reign of Queen Elizabeth. But this he found a very hard task for him to do ; and which created him much trouble and sorrow, and raised him up not a few enemies, as we shall see hereafter. Another of his cares was for the supplying the Church His first or- with Ministers, that might be persons of learning and lio- c 3 22 THE LIFE OF CHAP, nesty, and bred in the Universities, who being dispersed 11 ' about the nation, might preach, and teach the ignorant people ; for of this sort was a great want still. For many of the old Incumbents and Curates were such as were fitter to sport with the timbrel and pipe, than to take in their hands the book of the Lord, as the preacher at the Bishop's first ordination expressed it. A great number of these cattle were lately deprived, as they deserved; and so the more churches left destitute. Therefore on Ascension-day, May 16th, in the year 1577, was a great ordination of Ministers at Fulham by this Bishop ; and was his first or- dination ; when he appointed one Keltridg, formerly of Trinity College in Cambridge, a notable preacher, to make a sermon upon the occasion: which he did from 1 Tim. iii. 1, 2, 3. It is a true saying, If a man desire the office of Bishop, he desireth a good work. A Bishop therefore must be unreprovable, &c. This sermon he afterward printed, and dedicated unto the Bishop. In it he addressed himself to his Lordship against the vicious old Popish Clergy, yet in the Church, but undermining it, " humbly craving of his " Honour, whom God in his eternal counsel had placed " over them, the Levites, to rub and raze out all the stock " of Jezebel, to pluck up and deface them, who had no " title to the true priesthood, to rid the kingdom of those " headless fellows, who having of a long time served Peor, " and offered up the first-fruits of their youth to Acheron, " were then compelled to lie grovelling in the Church of " God, and in the darkness wherein they had loitered, and " choaked up the people with chaff and superstition, 1 '' &c. And those that were then ordained he exhorted, " That for " supply of preaching in the kingdom, they would scatter " themselves through every angle and quarter of this realm " in several congregations, that all countries might hear " their voice, and every part thereof might glorify the " Lord. And moreover he desired them, nay, charged " them in the Lord Christ, that they would not be of di- " vers minds, but that they would teach one God, and one " Christ, whom he had sent; sowing abroad no new and BISHOP AYLMER. " fantastical opinions, nor scattering devilish and old here- C II A P. " sies, nor inventing strange and fond novelties, thrusting 1I- " upon the silly souls innovations and fables, which apper- " tained not to edification, brought in at that time by the " schismatics of the times, and then troubling the common- " wealth." These admonitions did the grave Bishop think fit should be given these young Clergymen; that they might not add to the number of those that now were in the Church, but troubled the peace of it. At this ordina- tion were sixteen made Deacons, and ten Priests, after due examination of them by William Lane and William Cotton, his Chaplains. These Achans, of what persuasion soever they were, he thought himself bound to discover and set himself against. In this year 1577 he discovered a Popish Priest named Discovers a Meredith, and had him in hold: who came over from be-pj^' 1 yond sea in the year 1576, and conversed much in Lanca- shire and Nottinghamshire, and resided chiefly in one Al- len's house, brother to Dr. Allen, then in the college of Doway, (afterwards the Cardinal of that name, and a pen- sioner of the King of Spain.) The Bishop discovered con- cerning this Priest, that he carried about him a book of common resolutions to certain questions, which Papists here in England might propound to him in cases of conscience ; it is probable about dispensing with their obedience and al- legiance to the Queen, coming to church, and the like to these. In this book, which it seems the Bishop had seized, he extolled certain traitors that had suffered, and especially Felton, who set up the Pope's excommunication of Queen Elizabeth upon the door of St. Paul's in London, exciting her subjects to rebel against her. Him he called, The glo- rious Felton ; and England he styled Babylon. Wherein the Bishop supposed he obliquely aimed at the greatest very pestilently, as he said, meaning the Queen, as though she were the whore of Babylon. Of this man therefore the Bishop informed the Lord Treasurer, holding him a pass- ing crafty fellow, as he styled him. He refused to answer before him upon his oath : and would confess nothing con- c 4 THE LIFE OF c H A P. cerning the state, but in p>int of religion he was very frank. ' " Whereby it appeared.'" said the Bishop to the said Lord, " if thcv might be touched as near for their religion as they " are for the state, they would look twice about them." His appre- This blade carried divers trinkets about him ; as a cha- Spain. lice, a patin of tin, a painted crucifix, to be in the mass- book at the time of their consecration, which they used to kiss at the Memento ; a Portas daily used for Latin service. Whereby the Bishop gathered that he was a Priest, and had said mass all Lancashire over. He had also divers Ag-nus Dci's, a hallowed candle, beads, and other such like things. It should appear he had bestowed many, and these were the remainders. But he would name none, nor in anywise confess that he came from Borne. But the Bishop thought if he were shewn the rack, he would not be so close; for he seemed to be somewhat timorous. He was near the place where the Scotch Queen was detained pri- soner, but denied he was there. Dr. Wylson, the Queen's Ambassador in the Low Countries, wrote to our Bishop, that there were ten Priests dispersed of late into corners of this land; whereof this might well be one. Upon this occasion he gave the Lord Treasurer to understand, that there was such another in the parts of Suffolk, named Green, who dealt with divers thereabouts by degrees of speeches of mis- liking the loose government ; and told them at last how it would be hard to help those things without a conquest ; the better to reconcile the English Papists to the King of Spain's designed attempts against England, and to assist him whensoever he should invade. And he signified to the said Lord, that by some that came before him and the ec- clesiastical Commissioners, it appeared that there were con- spiracies and dangerous attempts towards. His adrice These intelligences this grave and wise Bishop, out of his sure'Tccn" care °^ re hgi° n an d tne state, gave to that great minister ; cerning Pa- and withal suggested freelv his own advices: which were, pists ' that it was time to look about. " I speak to your Lord- " ship," said he, " as one chiefly careful for the state, and " to use more severity than hitherto hath been used ; or BISHOP AVLMER. 25 " else we shall smart for it. For as sure as God liveth they t H ■ P. " look for an invasion, or else they would not fall away as n " " thev do." For the Papistical sort, who before outwardly complied with the laws, did now withdraw from the Church, and refuse the oath of supremacy; and others not well grounded, upon Popi-h suggestions turned Papists. He suggested moreover to the same Lord, that in these danger- ous times the heads of Papists which were obstinate (whom he called their chief captain s) should be placed in close prison, as Sir Thoma-> Fitz-Herbert, Townlev, and some others of that sort, who now had liberty, or were under an easv confinement only : men ready, if opportunity served, to give counsel and countenance. He signified that he liked not diat Fecknam, late Abbot of Westminster, Watson, late Bishop of Lincoln, and Young, another active Popish dig- nitarv under Queen Mary, should continue where they were, in London, in the Fleet or Marshalsea; where by their converse and advice they might instigate and do mis- chief ; advising that they might be placed again as they had been before, with some three Bishops, as Winchester, Lin- coln, Chichester, or Ely ; and that for his part, he, if he were out of his first-fruits, could be content to have one of them. About this time [viz. 1.577 or 1-578] orders came to the Orden for prison [of the Fleet as it seems] to keep under close re- m straint all the Papists, both knights and others. But thev had the indulgence to dine and sup together; when they sat for whole hours, conferring with and encouraging each other. And upon pretence of the sickness of the wife of one of them, under colour of phvsicians, Papists were ad- mitted to her, and she bv private wavs let them in to the rest ; where they communicated their news and the counsels that were taken among them. And divers of such as were Protestants, servants and others in the house, were infected and turned by them. Of all this, secret information was given by certain unknown persons that were privy to these doings ; whose letter to the Bishop it may not be amiss to set down. 38 THE LIFE OF CHAP. « Right Reverend Father in God, these are most hum- , " bly to advertise you for discharge of our consciences, and utter to the " to ^ es * re y our Lordship to see these abuses reformed, Bishop con- " which hereafter we mind to declare to your Lordship ; them? S " tnat w hereas her Majesty by the direction of your Lord- " ship and others, her Majesty's Commissioners in causes " ecclesiastical, have set down and appointed divers and " sundry good orders for the reformation of that idolatrous " sect of the Romanists, enemies unto her Majesty and her " realms, we thought it good to discharge our duties, and " to advertise your Lordship thereof. " So it is, that of late time there came commandment to " separate and shut up as close prisoners all the Papists, " as well knights as others. At which time there was re- " quest made unto your Lordship by the deputy of this " house, (as we think but for saving of charges,) that the " said knights and men of worship should meet dinner and " supper, where they should use but table-talk. The which " liberty to some of them, in our opinions, is more than was M before the said restraint. For that now they stay there " sometimes two hours after their suppers. The reforma- " tion whereof we refer to your fatherly consideration. " Also, we thought good to advertise your Lordship that " there are six prisoners, some of them gentlemen, whose " names are these : Mr. Farley, Mr. Thymbletharp, and his " brother, Mr. Thomson, Mr. Burchingshaw, and one Jen- " kin Williams : which six persons are thought to be by " the Papists infected and seduced since their coming hi- " ther. Of which two of them, named Burchinshaw and " Jenkin Williams, are appointed to attend upon the Pa- " pists, and sworn as though they were servants ; and within " these six months did come to church : with whom we " desire that your Lordship of yourself will appoint some " godly man to confer severally in time, lest they become " arrogant. " Also, we think good to signify unto your Lordship " some of their names, which have used to come to this " house to the Papists, and do yet resort to bring news. BISHOP AYLMEK. 27 " As one Dr. Fryer, a physician, who cometh and hath CHAP. " come often under colour to see Mrs. Trugeon, who is il ' " sick ; which doctor is accounted a notable Papist : and " one Mr. Rocheford, an Irish gentleman of Gray's-Inn or " Lincoln's-Inn. Both which, with others whom we know " not, come now to Mrs. Trugeon, since this restraint, who " is at liberty, and one of the notablest Papists of all the " house. The which Mrs. Trugeon doth so lodge, as all " the hours of the night he may go into the garden, and " give intelligence to all the Papists in the house, at his " pleasure, of any news that is brought in. " And lastly, there are certain officers in the house, as " the porter and the chamberlain, who are great with the " said Burchinshaw and Jenkin Williams, supposed Papists, " being all Welshmen, linked together, and leaning more " to the Papists than otherwise: which porter, as it is " supposed, is not yet sworn ; for he saith that he will have " all the servants of the house sworn before he be sworn. " Good my Lord, for God's sake, as secretly as your " Lordship may, see these abuses reformed, after such sort " as it may not any way be known that your Lordship hath " had any advice from any in this house, but rather by " some friend of your Lordship repairing to this house : as " it is most convenient for your Lordship to have both here " and in all other prisons about London. Wherein your " Lordship shall do God and her Majesty good service, dis- " charge your Lordship's duty, and satisfy our consciences. " And thus we commit your Lordship to the blessed keep- " ing of the Most Highest. " By your Lordship's loving friends humbly " to command, Nameless, " Because we would be Blameless. " It may please your Lordship to understand that the " Thymbletharps, Mr. Farly, and Mr. Thomson, have " been converted by Dr. Halsey and Trugeon.'" 28 THE LIFE OF CHAP. This was the letter of some well-affected to religion be- ' longing to this prison, that, as secret soever as the Papists here were, had observed these their practices. Whence we may see what reason the Bishop and the rest of the eccle- siastical Commissioners had to look about them for the pre- venting the mischief of these creatures of the Pope ; who even in the prison made it their business to propagate the treason for which they were committed. And the work was not very hard to do towards discontented persons laid up Thimble- for debt and misdemeanours, as the Thymblethorps were ; thorp. were committed to the Fleet for endeavouring to cheat the Queen of the tenths of the Clergy of Norfolk, which they were appointed by the Bishop of the diocese receivers of, and to leave the debt upon the Bishop. The Bishop The Bishop of London was a real enemy to Popish error Papists!^ ° an d superstition, and thought it greatly conducible to keep it out, now it was out. But he with many other good men were in continual fears of the re-entry of it, partly by the means of the neighbourhood of Scotland, where was a great faction of Papists; and partly by the Scotch Queen, pri- soner in England, a pretender to the crown imperial of this realm, and a busy and zealous woman of the Guisian fac- tion, bigoted Papists, and mortal haters of Queen Elizabeth. But it chanced about this time, that is, anno 1578, or there- abouts, the young King James of Scotland received the Pro- testant religion, and rejected the mass ; forbidding upon cer- tain penalties to be present at it. And together with this, news came that the said Queen of Scots was fallen very ill of a palsy ; whose death alone in all human appearance could put an end to England's fears. And it was wished to be rather natural than violent. But still the Bishop knew that nothing could have a good issue without God ; and therefore that he was at this juncto to be earnestly in- voked. These things the Bishop communicated to his old fellow-exile John Fox : and especially that he might excite the devotion of that pious reverend man, who was esteemed in his time a man powerful in prayer with God ; and sent for this purpose a letter to him to this tenor : BISHOP A YLMER. 29 Sal. in Christo. Accepimus Reginam Scotorum paralysi CHAP. graviter laborare, vel ad desperationem, et aliis nonmdlis It- torque? i morbis. Rex ipse optimal spei adolescens Parlia- Writes to menti aut/writate decrevit de una relxgione confirmanda, ^j^ te ° F °* u Papistica e Jinibus suis extcrminanda. Ita ut quisque wuVEpist. MSS- sam auditurus, prima moneatur, secundo bona ipsius Jisco adjudiccntur : si tertid peccaverit, solum vertcre cogatur. Hcec ad tc scripsi, turn ut hujus boni participem jaciam ; turn ut d te preces cum lacrymis Christo nostra Jundantur, et nos beare, et suum Evangelium propagare pcrgat. Qua concedat optimus Jesus noster, quern non minus tibi Jumi- liarem existimo, quam est amicus quisque amico. Ora, ora, mi frater ; nam. plurimum apud Christum tuas vulere preces non dubito. Tu i a tnantissimus JOHANNES LOND. In this year 1578, the infection of the plague spreading His care in London, our thoughtful Bishop took care of two things, p i a g lie i n viz. to preserve the lives of his Clergy, and yet to make London - provision that the infected might be visited, and have spi- rituals administered to them. Therefore he summoned the city Clergy before him, (where also were present, as assist- ants, Nowell, Dean of Paul's ; Mullins and Walker, Arch- deacons; and Stanhop, Chancellor,) to elect and appoint out of them visitors of the sick folk ; and all the rest to be spared by reason of the danger of the infection. The for- wardness of many Ministers to undertake this office was noted; some for covetousness, and others for vain-glory, and others to supply their wants, namely, such as were in great debt, and others without service and employment. But the Ministers generally disliked this motion ; thinking it a part of their duties to suffer with their flock, and to submit to God's will in the discharge of their functions. The Bishop shewed by this, his fatherly care of the city ; and also his policy for ceasing of the plague, by dispersing directions in books printed for that purpose. Several occasions fell out for Bishop Aylmer to exert his 30 THE LIFE OF CHAP, care for religion against the dangerous Romanists and their emissaries, who were very active in these days by all ways cartT" ant * means to reestablish themselves, and to overthrow the Popish' present constitution, and the Queen, who had taken upon printer. jjer to be the supreme guardian of it. One Carter a printer had divers times been put in prison for printing of lewd pamphlets, Popish and others, against the government. The Bishop by his diligence had found his press in the year 1579; and some appointed by him to search his house, among other Papistical books, found one written in French, entitled, The Innocency of the Scotch Queen; who then was a prisoner for laying claim to the crown of England, and endeavouring to raise a rebellion. A very dangerous book this was : the author called her the heir apparent of this crown: inveighed against the late execution of the Duke of Norfolk, though he were executed for high trea- son: defended the rebellion in the north anno 1569: and made very base and false reflections upon two of the Queen's chiefest ministers of state, viz. the Lord Treasurer, and the late Lord Keeper, Bacon. The Bishop had committed this fellow to the Gate-house ; but he desired the Lord Trea- sure at his leisure to call him before him, and examine him, having denied to answer upon oath to the Bishop : and promised that he would also send to him the Warden of the Company of Stationers, who would inform him of another book which was abroad, wherein her Majesty was touched ; and of certain other new forms of letters which Carter had made, but would not confess them. Removes Another Popish gentleman there was about these times, prisonat' 1 ' 8 name d Thomas Pond, sometime a courtier, that had lain in stortford. prison (that of the Marshalsea I suppose) for some years : him the Bishop thought convenient now to remove from London unto another prison more remote, namely, his castle at Bishop's Stortford, to prevent his infecting others by his talk ; for some such information, and what a dangerous person he was, was brought to the Bishop by Trip and Crowley, two Ministers who went to confer with him. He talked notably with them ; and observing them to insist BISHOP AYLMER. 31 much upon Scripture, he warily required them to lay down CHAP, some sure principle for both parties to proceed upon ; and U " that was this, Whether the private spirit of particular men, or the public spirit of the universal Church, ought to judge of the sense of the Scriptures ? For he, when he heard them frequently quoting places of Scripture, affirmed, that we must not run in these controversies to the only letter of Scripture, understood according to every private man's pleasure, but to the most certain judgment of the universal, at the least the most ancient, Church, which being governed by the Spirit of God, propounded the truth and genuine sense of Scripture. He also then proposed to them (though he were a layman, and not deeply versed in divinity) six firm reasons, as he thought, of his opinion, and required those Ministers to answer them ; and that afterwards he might have liberty to confute their answers either by speech or writing. Upon this relation given of Pond by the Ministers, the Bishop thought fit to remove him to the aforesaid castle, being, as the Popish writers say, much provoked and angry. And they describe it to be an obscure and melancholy place, void of both light and converse. CHAP. III. His farther dealings with Papists. CampioiCs book. Nor was the Bishop's endeavour only to discover and at- Campion's tack books of this poisonous nature, but to arm people book ' against the doctrines and principles contained in them, by providing substantial answers to them. One Edmund Cam- pion, formerly a scholar of Oxford, now a revolter from re- ligion and his country, had entered himself into the society of the Jesuits. And about the year 1581 he set forth a book consisting of ten reasons, written in a terse, elegant, Latin style, and dedicated to the Scholars of both Universi- 32 THE LIFE OF CHAP, ties, in vindication of what he had done in returning to L_ Rome, and exhortatory to them to follow him, slandering the Protestant religion with false and unworthy imputa- tions. Care was taken privily to disperse this book in the Universities; which gave disturbance to the government. The Lord Treasurer Burghley thought it needful to have a good answer timely set forth, to prevent the mischief it The Bishop might do ; and reckoned Bishop Avlmer very fit for such wished to ° , . . , 1 ' \ „ answer it. an undertaking; in one particular respect especially, namely, for certain blots and disparagements cast upon the first re- formers of religion, and restorers of it from Popery ; in whose times the Bishop lived, and with some of them, and their doings, was well acquainted. The Bishop had heard of the book, and had sent to Oxford, and searched other places for it, but could not meet with it, so secret 'it was kept; which was partly his excuse for not answering it. He had also at this time an ague, which was fallen down so sore in his leg that he was not able to study without great danger : but notwithstanding he let the Treasurer know, if he could get the book, he would do what his health would permit ; adding, that as to what he wrote touching those first worthy and learned men, he guessed that the things wherewith he reproached them, were nothing else but such railing collec- tions as were gathered against them by the apostate Staphi- lus, which for the most part were not to be found in their Hisjudg- works. And moreover, as to the reproaches the Jesuits Protestant cast u P on these reverend fathers of the Reformation, he writers. knew there were divers ncevi in them, as lightly be in all men's writings : as some things were spoken by Luther hy- perbolically, and some by Calvin ; as in the doctrine of the Sacrament, which he afterwards corrected, and in predesti- nation. This Jesuit, the Bishop subjoined, and Staphilus, might herein soon be answered, if they would but look in the end of the Master of the Sentences, where they should find under the title of Errorum Parisiis Condcmnatorum, that their own Peter Lumbard, Thomas Aquinas, Gratian among the Schoolmen, and Tertullian, Cyprian, Augustine, Hierorae, and others among the Fathers, to be condemned, BISHOP AYLMER. 33 yoa, errasse contra Jidcm, " to have erred against the C H A P. " faith," as he termeth it. And yet the rest of their doc- trine was holden for Catholic; and not the whole Catholic doctrine condemned for a few of their natvi. A precious stone, said he, may be found in a dunghill, and in the fairest visage some little wart. He proceeded to give his His advice advice to the Lord Treasurer, whom he saw much con- ■y TK .* ureT ceraed for the honour of the Protestant religion so struck at and defamed by this book, that it were not amiss that a letter might be sent from the Lords of the Council to the Archbishop of Canterbury, or to him, (the Bishop of London,) to enjoin the Deans, Archdeacons, and Doctors, to make some collections for these matters : for that such as had not great dealings in the Church, to take up their time, (as they had not, yea, and some Bishops also,) might, hav- ing that leisure, help well, as he said, to this building. Wherefore else, added he, have they their livings ? And as for the number of books, he thought such a good quantity might be printed, as should serve for that purpose. He gave in also to the Lord Burghley a particular sche- Persons by dule of the names of those he judged fit for this under- liate( j J^!' taking ; which he divided into two ranks ; some to find ma- answering; terials, others to build the house; some to make proper book'. 01 " 511 collections, others to write and compile the book from those collections. The collectors to be these : the Deans of Paul's, Win- ton, York, Christ Church, Windsor, Sarum, Ely, Wor- cester, Canterbury. The Archdeacons of Canterbury, Lon- don, Middlesex, Essex, (Dr. Walker,) Lincoln, Coventry, (Dr. James,) Sudbury, (Dr. Styl.) The writers to be, Dr. Fulke, Dr. Goade, Dr. Some. Great pity it is, that this noble design of the Bishop's laying down was not pursued, and brought to perfection: wherein a good history of the reformation of religion, and of the doctrines embraced, might have been substantially set forth, by such who lived in or near those times, for the doing justice to so glorious a work as that was. But per- 34 THE LIFE OF CHAP, haps it was not thought convenient that Campion's book should have so much honour done it, to be so solemnly an- swered. But yet it went not without answer, Mr. Whit- aker, Professor of Divinity in Cambridge, and others do- ing it. His reflec- But when the Treasurer had soon after sent the Bishop Tampion" Campion's pamphlet, and desired him again, as his health book. would serve, to peruse it, and according to his discretion to set some about the work, this caused some farther thoughts in him concerning it pro re nata ; which he thus imparted to the said Nobleman ; that as for his collections of strange opinions and sayings of some of the Reformers set down in his chapter entitled Paradoxa, he thought (sup- posing the author truly alleged them) that none of our Church meant to defend Luther's hyperbola, or all things that had passed the pens of Calvin or Beza: for, quisque suo sensu abundet. That we read them as Austin read Cyprian, and as he would be read himself, that where he dissented from the canonical Scripture, he should not be al- lowed. Secondly, that if we should make such a malicious collection of their writers and Schoolmen, we should find other manner of things in them: sed in nuUws juravu mus verba magistri ; i. e. " but that we had learned to " swear to the dictates of no master 11 but of Christ. Then he shewed what little credit was to be taken to his quota- tions of Scripture, when in the very first text that he cited, he used the Septuagint interpretation, utterly different from the truth of the original : that if he dealt so in all others, his credit would be but small : Ex unguibus leoncm. Again, that there was a favourableness of interpretation due to writers and speakers ; and if we should take every thing to the worst, and not interpret candidly, what should we say of Gregory Nazianzen, who saith, Ita nos Deos fecit Christus, ut Me factus homo est ; with many such in Lac- tantius and others. He added, it was a property of a spider to gather the worst and leave the best : and that his Lord- ship should find his (Campion's) writings to be the arrogant BISHOP AYLMER. 35 vanities of a Porphyrias or a Julian ; who were base apostates chap. from Christianity. And in fine, that were it not for the toil lU ' of his ecclesiastical Commission, he could gladly have occu- pied himself in searching out his vanities ; but according as his health would serve, he would peruse the piece, and set some others a work. We have not done with Campion a yet. In September The Bishop 1581, (Campion having been caught, and now in hold uip Ut ; ng- the Tower,) the vapouring challenge which he had made of maintaining his doctrine by disputation with any Protestant whatsoever came into remembrance. Several of our Divines took him up : and, by the consent of some of the superior powers, there were several conferences had with him. But when the day was come allotted for these learned combats, the bruit thereof brought great numbers of people to hear. This gave a disgust to the Court, which thought it most convenient to have it privately managed, to prevent all noise, boastings, and misreports, which must fly abroad concerning it. The blame of this confluence was imputed to the Bishop, though he was of the same mind, and had advised the Lieutenant of the Tower of his misliking that so many were admitted. This he was fain by letter to sig- nify to the Lord Treasurer in his own behalf, adding, that the Lieutenant's authority was not to be directed by him, (being an exempt jurisdiction perhaps,) but by her Majesty and the Lords : nay, and that for the ill opinion he had of any dispute at all, he sent to stay it : which was all that he could do. And whereas Mr. Whitacre had answered in Latin Campion's Ten Reasons, now some were very busy in translating the answer into English, in order to the pub- lishing thereof. But neither did the Bishop like this, that the people's minds might not be heated with controversies ; and therefore, if the copy came into his hands, he was re- solved to stay it. The issue proved the matter as the Bishop feared : for The Papists the friends of the Jesuit boasted much ; and among the rest boMt " • See Additions, Numbs I. 36 THE LIFE OF CHAP, one Cawood b , perhaps son of the Popish printer of that ' name, who talked very liberally, extolling Campion's learn- ing, and attributing the victory to him : and for his confi- dent and slanderous reports was brought before the Bishop, who gave him the punishment of confinement in the Clink. CHAP. IV. His dealing with the Puritans. His advice concerning the University. His trouble about Jelling- his woods. Puritans. ThESE were some of our Bishop's dealings with Papists. He was also industrious for the checking of another sort of opposers of the Church established, chiefly its enemies in regard of the ecclesiastical regiment of it, which they thought to be Antichristian, because used in the Popish Church. These were now commonly known by the name of Puritans and Precisians; whom the Bishop had indeed little kindness for, and they as little for him. I proceed to shew what happened between him and them, and his opinion con- cerning the danger of them. His opinion In the year 1577 he met with several persons of a con- them" 16 ° f trar y wa y to P a P^ ts » °f w hom he informed the Lord Trea- surer, that in respect of their hindering unity and quietness they were not much less hurtful than they ; namely, Chark, Chapman, Field, and Wilcox. These he had before him ; the two former he had some hopes of; but the two latter shewed themselves obstinate, and especially Field ; who, notwithstanding the Archbishop's inhibition, had entered into great houses, and taught, as he said, God knows what. And advice His advice concerning these men was, that they might be them.""" 5 profitably employed in Lancashire, Staffordshire, Shrop- shire, and such other like barbarous countries, to draw the people from Papism and gross ignorance : and that though they went a little too far, yet he supposed it would be less >' See Additions, Numl). II. BISHOP AYLMER 37 labour to draw them back, than now it was to hale them CHAP, forw ard ; and that some letters of friendly request might be sent thither for some contribution to be made by the towns and gentlemen for some competent stipend to relieve them. And he thought this might grow greatly to the profit of the Church ; and therefore communicated this counsel to the Lord Treasurer, and prayed him at his leisure to think on it. Yet he declared that he said all this, not because he liked them, but because he would have his cure rid of them. Some years ago (about 1571 or 1572) came forth, in imprisons a print, a book entitled, An Admonition to the Parliament ; Admon!" the main design whereof was to subvert the Church as it ^ on i to the t was then established in the public worship by the Book of Common Praver, and in the government of it by Bishops and other ecclesiastical officers. This therefore gave the Queen great disgust ; and the Churchmen found themselves obliged to give a full answer to the book ; which was done by several, but especially Dr. Whitgift, afterwards Bishop of Worcester and Archbishop of Canterbury successively : and a severe proclamation was issued out, anno 1573, for the better observation of the Common Prayer and orders of the Church, and for the suppressing of that book. But now, about November or December 1578, when the book was almost laid aside, a young stationer, named Thomas Wood- cock, hoping to make a good gain by the adventure, vended several of these books ; whereupon the Bishop of London committed him to Newgate. But his friends failed not to in- tercede with the Bishop for Woodcock's enlargement. To whom the Bishop answered, that he neither could nor would do any thing without the Lord Treasurer's consent, or by his letters or warrant. Which was looked upon as somewhat rigorous in him. Whereas indeed it was most true, that he could not of his own authority discharge a criminal he had committed without inflicting due punishment, unless it were by some order from above ; especially such as dispersed or sold this Admonition, which depraved the Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments, and so was interpreted to tend to make divisions and dissensions among d 3 THE LIFE OF CHAP, the people ; and to breed disputes against the common or- ' der. And therefore the Queen, in the aforesaid proclama- tion, commanded aD printers and stationers, or others, who had any of these books in their possession, to bring the same forthwith to the Bishop of the diocese, or to some of her Majesty's Privy Council ; and not to suffer any of them upon pain of imprisonment. The issue therefore was, that Woodcock, having lain about a week in Newgate, found such favour from those of his own company of stationers, that the chief of them, as Richard Tottyl, the Master, John Harrison and George Bishop, Wardens, and Wil- liam Seres and John Day, directed their letter to the Lord Treasurer, soliciting him that he would either direct his warrant for the enlargement of this man, or else to signify his pleasure to the Bishop, to take order herein accordingly, the said person putting in sufficient bonds to appear at all times when he should be called, and ready to answer any matters that should be objected against him. And thus the Bishop by his watchfulness over this sort of men, and their books too, which spread their opinions, shewed how little he liked them. One of the In this year 1578, one William Hopkinson, a Minister LiDJoln°de- e ^ Lincolnshire, and under the care of our Bishop when di.ates a Archdeacon there, translated a Latin book of Beza in be- i,, m half of Calvin's doctrine concerning election, entitling it, An evident Display of Popish Practices, or patched Pelagianism : which the said Hopkinson printed, and dedicated to our Bishop, in acknowledgment of his former good and careful inspection of the Clergv of Lincoln, " and his zeal for the " Lord's family," as he expressed it ; " which," he said, " he " himself eftsoons experienced to his great comfort, in the " time of his being within his jurisdiction. And being lately " come to the great charge of overseeing the diocese of " London, he prayed God to increase in him his many and " mighty blessings, and to multiplv upon him the measure " of his grace; that as he had chosen him into the forefront " of His harvest, and given him among others the chiefest u and special charge over his field furnished with labourer:*; BISHOP AYLMER. 39 " so he continually would make full the measures of his CHAP. " own mercies in his heart, Sec."" This great esteem had the U ' learned Clergy for him. But the Bishop was as little liked of the Puritans. For "ne Wei- as he roundly executed his office in reclaiming or suppress-,^. Bishop _ ing them, they spared not to defame and shew their ill-will to him. Such a matter fell out in the year 1579 : Cook- ham, a considerable parish in Berkshire, was destitute of a preacher ; some Puritan minister belonging to that place having been, as it seems, suspended by the Commission. Hither the Bishop sent Mr. Keltridg, before mentioned, an able preacher, to supply that church. But one Welden, a person of some note in Cookham, hindered him, saying, that though the Bishop himself should come and sit with Keltridg in Cookham church, he should have a very warm seat, and he would make them both weary of their places. The Bishop upon this disturbance sent an attachment for him. But he told him, that he should answer that which he had done before his betters. He reported also, that if the Bishop had sent forth another attachment, he had proceeded so far with his Lordship's betters, that he should have had such an attachment for him, that none should have bailed him ; and that he himself would have been his keeper. And when a pursuivant had served him with a letter, he said, the Bishop of London had now learned good manners. He said, moreover, what was he before but a private man ? but he must be lorded. And it please your Lordship at every word ; and that there was never Bishop so vilely esteemed as he was, and that he was as ill thought of as ever was Bonner. All this was proved by deposition ; and the said Welden convict bv the court, because he re- fused in a most contemptuous manner to answer : and for his great contempt he was in January committed by the rest of die Commissioners, without the Bishop, because it was his own cause. The Bishop was not a little moved to Ompiai&* be so used in his discharge of the Queen's Commission ; °' ,t- which made him think it convenient to let the Lord Trea- surer know it, and to countenance their prosecution of this d 4 40 THE LIFE OF CHAP. man. He reminded him, how he and the Lord Chancellor ' had told him, that they were to countenance and back the Commissioners in the said Commission ; which he humbly prayed his Lordship to do, or else he saw not how he might continue in that place ; and that for his own part, if every man might thus rail at them for their faithful and painful service in the executing of her Majesty's Commission, it must needs make him weary. Finally, he hoped his Lordship would not suffer him to be so abused. This care and these discouragements soon made him earnestly desirous to change his see, as we shall hear hereafter. A book The Queen and her Court were now in September 1579 against the , - . Queen's startled upon one or two occasions. 1 he one was, the news marriage Q f tne breaking out of a rebellion in Ireland; and the other, with Mon- . sieur. the publishing of a book written by one Stubbs, a great Pu- ritan, against the Queen's marriage with the Duke of An- jou, the French King's brother : for he being a Papist and a Frenchman, the English had an antipathy against him upon both accounts. Many expressions in the book tended to sedition, and gave high offence to the Queen ; as though she herself were warping from religion by her entertain- ment of such an one. It made also very dishonourable re- flections upon that Prince ; which she feared France might well resent. The very title also was penned after that rude The Disco- sort that it might justly offend; viz. The Discovery of a Raping * S a P m g Gulph, whereinto England is like to be swallowed Guiph. by another French Marriage, if the Lord forbid not the banns, by letting her Majesty see the Sin and Punishment thereof. In one place of this book he disparaged the per- son of this Prince, and by consequence the Queen's judg- ment in entertaining him. " I humbly beseech her Majesty " that she will view it, (his person,) and surview it ; and in " viewing she will fetch her heart up to her eyes, and carry " her eyes down to her heart. And I beseech God grant " her at that time to have her eyes in her head; even in the " sense which Solomon placeth a wise man's eyes in his " head : and then, I doubt not, upon conference of her wise " heart and her eyes together, he shall have her dispatching BISHOP AYLMER. 41 " answer.'" And then, as to this Prince's manners, thus he CHAP, exposed them ; (both his and his brother's, now King of 1V " France;) " They speak in all languages of a marvellous, " licentious, and dissolute youth passed by this brother- " hood ; and of as strange incredible parts of intemperance " played by them, as those were of Heliogabalus. Yet I " will not rest upon conjecturals. For if but the fourth part " of the misrule bruited should be true, it must needs draw " such punishments from God, who for the most part pu- " nisheth these vile sins of the body, even in the body and " bones of the offender, besides other plagues to a third and " fourth generation ; as I would my poor life might redeem " the joining of Queen Elizabeth to such an one in that near " knot, which must needs make her half in the punishment " of those sins." This bold book, therefore, and clamours of the people, (London being in a dangerous ferment,) espe- cially those that were of the Puritan party, made a consider- able shock at Court. It was therefore thought convenient Occasions to send a hasty despatch to London, to the Bishop there, and *„j d g^y°£, presently to summon the Clergy for the better pacifying summon the these matters. And on a sudden, September 27, 1579, on ciergy? Sunday, at one of the clock, the Clergy of the city were called unto the Bishop's palace ; where forty of them ap- peared. Then the Bishop, the Dean of Paul's being pre- sent and assistant, told them the occasion of his sudden calling for them was, to admonish them of two things chiefly. The former was of one Andreas Jacobus, a Dutchman, and, Andreas as it seems, a Minister of the strangers' church in London ; Jacpbus - who was a Lutheran, or an ubiquitary, as they now styled The ubiqui- them who were for the real presence ; and had caused great ^" v a e ^ n " quarrels among the strangers' preachers. He warned them to take heed how they gave ear to the sophistical arguments of him, or any such like. That this ubiquitarian contro- versy had caused great heats and differences among the Pro- testants of Germany, and that the Divines had a Diet at Smalcald on that occasion ; and that God be thanked it was appeased, and all at quiet among them. He proceeded to the other reason, (and which was the i2 THE LIFE OF CHAP, chief indeed,) why he called for them at that time ; to wit, n ' upon the account of Stubbs's book, and of the animosities Admonishes that it had occasioned ; for people were highly offended at about th"/ Monsieur's being at Court, and perhaps he used his religion Queen. there. And many of the preachers themselves meddled in that argument, and in matters of state, in their pulpits, to the farther disturbing of the minds of the people. There- fore the Bishop first of all assured them with many good words of the Queen's steadiness in religion, wherein she was, he said, resolute and settled. Then, that they should not meddle with such high secular matters, nor intrude themselves into the Queen's affairs; but study peace and quietness, and to promote it in their several charges : that they should be constant, sober, prudent, and wise; and that they should do their endeavour in their places to bring in that dangerous book : for which purpose there was a pro- clamation issued forth. And both the author, printer, and disperser afterwards were discovered and severely punished. For which I refer the reader to the civil historian. The Minis- These disturbances about the Queen's marriage being don now" cn i e % moved by such as were enemies to the ecclesiastical often cited, constitutions, a straiter hand was this year held over them, and the Ministers of the city, for their due conformity to the orders of the Church. For besides this summons al- ready mentioned, they were four times more called together by order from above to the Bishop, that there might a dili- gent inspection be made into their behaviour ; and for the prescribing them several rules in their ministry. Articles of The next citation then of the Ministers of London was inquiry. November the 10th following, at St. Sepulchre's church ; where also met many persons sworn to make inquisition upon certain articles to be given them ; which articles were as follow: L For the true and faithful observation of the book of public prayers : 2. If any preachers meddled with matters of state in their public or private doctrine, or inter- meddled with alterations of states and kingdoms : 3. If any used to preach not licensed thereunto ; for that such who had not licences were not to preach : 4. To inquire after BISHOP AYLMER. is private conventicles, preachers, and fasts ; 5. If there were C H A P. any alterations from the Book of Common Prayer ; and to 1V ' inquire who, and how many, gathered to private preaching : 6. To make diligent search after vagrant preachers and Popish priests. Again, in January this same year, 1579, came forth arti- other arti- cles to be ministered and inquired of by the parsons, vicars ^of'the' and curates, ministers and church-wardens, of every parish Council'* within the archdeaconry of London, according to a com- mandment sent from the Lords of the Queen's Majesty's Privy Council, by their letters bearing date January 17, 1579; viz. I. Who is parson, vicar, curate, or minister of your pa- rish, and whether he be resident upon his benefice, or no. II. Whether the parson or vicar doth serve the cure of his parish himself, or who doth serve it for him. III. Whether your parson or vicar doth say the divine service in the church, and minister the sacraments of Bap- tism and of the Lord's Supper in his own person, or who doth it for him. IV. Whether the parson or vicar doth use weekly or monthly to preach or to read any lectures in their church, or in any other church or place ; and where he doth use so to preach or read. V. Whether any other minister or preacher doth use to preach or to read any lectures in their church ; who they or he be, and set down their names, and where such preacher or reader is beneficed. VI. Whether such minister or preacher, as useth to preach or to read any lecture in the church, doth use also to minis- ter the sacrament of Baptism and the Lord's Supper in his church, or in any other church ; and where he doth use to minister the same. I am apt to conclude that these were articles of the Bi- shop's framing ; but that he procured the Privy Council to own and send them as theirs, to give them the more strength and authority- For the better execution of the Council's letters, it was the Clergy 44 THE LIFE OF CHAP, ordered the Clergy at this meeting after this manner, " That ' " from henceforth you do not admit any man to preach, or " to read any lectures in any of your churches, but such as " you do know ; that do also in their own persons minister " the sacraments of Baptism and of the holy Communion, " according to the order prescribed in the Book of Common " Prayer. " Ye shall make return of your answer to these articles " on this side the first day of March next coming, to Mr. " Good the registrar."" Another In pursuance of which articles, February 6th following, Ministers, there was another call of the London Clergy by virtue of the Council's letters. Then there were again precepts given to mark the recusants of the Book of Common Prayer, or such as refused to administer the sacraments after that or- der, or that only preached, but had no celebration of the sacraments ; putting that work upon their curates, or as- signs, or that preached and used not the book, and so made a schism. The church-wardens were called and sworn to present all such. Another. Now on the first of March, the Clergy was summoned again, and met, according to the Council's letters before mentioned, in pursuance of the six articles. Thus close was the matter of conformity this year pursued ; and that be- cause of the dangerous schism that was now a breeding, and the apprehension of the great evils that must needs ensue upon that ; while the Common Prayer was by some in part, and by others wholly, laid aside, and the sacraments of the Church disused, or shifted off to be performed by others that were hired or procured. All which considerations made both the Bishop and the Queen herself somewhat vi- gorous in the suppressing these men. And this quickening of the London Ministers in their obedience to the ecclesiasti- cal laws went on the next year, as we shall see by and by. His advice About this time the University of Cambridge was run theUniver- mto Puritanism, and the Bishop was consulted with about it sity. by the Lord Burghley, the Chancellor thereof. For when, in the beginning of March 1579, upon the motion of Dr. BISHOP AYLMER. 45 Pern, Dean of Ely, and others, making complaint to the CHAP, said Chancellor of the Puritans 1 disorderly preaching, and of IV ' the unsuitahle apparel of the scholars, he was resolved to take some order for the redress of both, he sent the said Dean to the Bishop from him, for his opinion ; which ac- cordingly he gave in these particulars. 1. That all licences granted by the University should be called in, and granted anew by the Heads, to such as would subscribe to the articles synodical, as in all dioceses it was used ; and that bonds should be taken of the parties that they should preach no innovation, as he himself used to do in granting his licences. 2. That the Heads of the houses might be enjoined by the Chancellor to see every man to his own company, that both at home and abroad they used scholars 1 apparel, according to their statutes ; or else to crave the aid of the rest of the Heads to expel such stubborn persons out of the University, as would not submit themselves to that order. And this to be done by some injunction from her Majesty, to authorize the Heads in that behalf. And this he thought would be a good way for the redress of both offences; for, Stultitia, said he, Ugata in corde pueri virga discipline. fugatur; and indeed the only way ; for he thought no other way would do. These were the resolute counsels of a resolute man. The Bishop about this time, or somewhat before, thought Licence for fit to grant somewhat an unusual licence to one Manwaring, [^afsesf which was to keep good order at the funerals of the nobility and gentry; when the rude people used to commit much outrage and disorder by defacing the hearses as they passed along the streets, and violently taking away the coats of arms and other ornaments ; and to preserve the better de- cency at these solemnities ; yet without intent of encroach- ing upon the office of heralds. And to this tenor ran the Bishop's faculty, which because somewhat extraordinary I set down. " John, by the permission of God Bishop of London, " to all and singular to whom these presents shall appertain, " greeting. Whereas about the hearses of honourable and 4G THE LIFE OF CH AP. " worshipful men there groweth sundry discourse by em- ' " bezzeling and stealing away the escutcheons of arms and BlmeriRe- " other ornaments to funerals belonging; with such other " rudeness and misdemeanor ; we have upon good consider- " ation hereunto moved, permitted and licensed Nicolas " Manering, servant to the Right Honourable the Countess * of Darby, to have the keeping of the said hearses .within " our diocese of London, for the avoiding of the said incon- " veniences and disorders ; and this his licence to endure " the natural life of the said Nicolas Manering, not abridg- " ing but aiding the heralds in their office. Yeoven under " our hand and seal at Harnsey, September 25th, the 20th " of the Queen. " JOHN LONDON." Comniis- By a commission dated May 1579, he constituted Ro- slons - "bert King, clerk, to exercise the office of Commissary in partibus within the archdeaconry of Essex and Colchester, and other places. And about four years after, anno 1583, December 26th, he preferred a very remarkable man, (famous afterward for his faithful and able management of great places of trust Sir Julius pertaining to the civil law,) Julius, afterwards Sir Julius t *sar. Caesar, LL. D. to whom he gave the office of Commissary and Sequestrator General in the archdeaconry of Essex and Colchester, and the deanery of Braughing, Harlow, Dun- mow, and other places. Troubled But now let me proceed to a matter that created the Bi- tng hil 6 "" sno P some passion and disturbance. He had made a good woods. f a ]l 0 f hl s woods ; and that in so large a proportion, and (as it was pretended) so unlawfully, that an information was brought to the Lord Treasurer and Council against him for it, as though he had made a great spoil of the timber and woods, and wasted the revenues of the bishopric. It was informed, that he had felled and sold three hundred timber trees at one time, and an hundred at another, and some more besides at another : also that a great number of acres of wood were sold at divers times, allowing to every acre BISHOP AYLMER. 47 certain timber trees. Though this information was partly CHAP, true, yet it had more of malice than truth in it. But the lV ' Bishop upon this w as brought before the Council, where the said Treasurer in May 1579 openly blamed him ; holding himself bound, as he said, so to do, as he was a public min- ister, and with all plainness and freedom telling him, that there was a Bishop once displaced for such a deed. These words gave the Bishop some uneasiness, and provoked him to some anger, holding himself unblamable for what he had done. Whereupon coming home he took up his pen, and in that Writes to heat that was upon him vented his grieved mind to the same -p"^^^ noble Lord, telling him that they were but indigested sur- abo,lt mises of his wasting the woods, giving (in a writing in- closed) to the particidar articles of accusation particular an- swers ; wherewith, as he shortly told him, if his Lordship should be satisfied, he should be glad ; but if not, he would stand to the justification of his doings, both in that and in all other things. He added, that if he (the Lord Trea- surer) thought his answers were either untrue, or not suffi- cient to satisfy him, he prayed him to call to him a gentle- man, (well acquainted with the Bishop's doings,) and one whom his Lordship judged to be both upright and wise, and of great experience, and to inform himself by him ; and if it fell not out that he (the Bishop) was not too careful a man of his woods, and that they were much the better for him, then let him lose his credit with her Majesty and all their Honours of the Council. But, in fine, these surmises against him he counted but light in comparison of his grief, as he expressed himself, that " my Lord Treasurer should have a " discontented mind toward the Bishop of London,' 1 whose friendship he valued above all ; and therefore the seeming estrangement thereof could not but be very afflicting to him. The sum of the paper above mentioned, wherein he en- His defence deavoured to clear himself by distinct answers to each ob- of lumself - jection against him, was this : That those trees which he had given order for the falling of were not timber trees, but pollards, doatcd and decayed at the top ; nor was the num- 4S THE LIFE OF CHAP, ber of them so many as was informed. He acknowledged that 1V ' in the years 1577, 1578, and 1579, he sold sixscore acres of wood by the arbitrament of the Lord Dyer and consent of the tenants, and allowed two lopped and doated trees to each acre; which he would justify to be an increase of wood: for that for which he had received 300/. at the next fall (the spring being kept) would be worth 500/. And that whereas it was informed, that the sales of these woods amounted to 1000/. he shewed they came but to 600/. And in the whole, he desired that it might be considered, that in these three years he had paid, and must, to the Queen, 1800/. besides his housekeeping, wherein he had threescore persons young and old ; that he bought his fuel at Fulham wholly ; and that at London and Harnsey he used coals, sparing wood, which came to sixscore pounds yearly : in the whole, in fuel eighteen score pounds. Moreover, the burning of his house (at Harnsey, if I mistake not) put him to 200 mark charges. And lastly, he was able to prove, that whereas 400 acres of wood were destroyed by his late predecessor, and threescore more in his time, the see was the better by 100/. a year. Forbid to But, in short, this business of the wood still depended ; more of bis ^ or ^ ^ n( ^ tnat aoout half a year after, the Queen sent her wood. letters to the Bishop, and some others, to inquire into the felling of those woods; to which the Bishop, with the others, prepared their answer, and wanted only to know whether they should direct their letters to the Queen immediately, or to the Lord Treasurer, who might inform her Majesty concerning their answer : and for direction herein the Bi- shop craved the said Treasurer's advice. This ended at length with a restraint from her Majesty, that the Bishop hereafter should take down no more of his woods. Endeavours Now also the business of dilapidations came on between sion°fo™di- our Bishop and the Archbishop of York, his predecessor; lapidations. wherein also the Archbishop of Canterburv, predecessor to him of York, was involved. In the beginning of the year 1577 he had laboured to procure a Commission for that end, and made use of Secretary Walsingham therein. The BISHOP AYLMER. 4!) Archbishop made his complaint to the said Secretary against CHAP. Bishop Aylmer's proceedings, shewing the many good turns ' he had done him ; and withal the good promises the said Bishop had before his consecration made him, not to trou- ble him in this regard. He also sent up his servant from Bishopthorp, where he now was, to enter into reasonable conditions with Bishop Aylmer, with which he made Wal- singham privy ; who soon laboured with the Bishop in this affair to bring things to an accommodation. But it could not or would not be done ; and the reason was, because it was not safe for him to put this suit to an end by arbitra- tion ; which Walsingham was willing to take upon him, and the Bishop declared himself to have been willing to leave it to him ; but that for the security of his posterity it must be decided by law : which the Bishop signified in his letter written to him in May. Therein he signified, " That he found himself marvel- His letters " lously beholden to him for his good continuance and ready ^ta^f'" " answers of his matters, that his man whom he sent unto " him found at his hands. That the cause that moved him Par.erOtfiee. " so earnestly to urge the commission for dilapidations was, " that unless he had end by law, he and his executors could " not be discharged ; which he was sure, if her Majesty un- " derstood, she would grant him justice for his indemnity : " otherwise he assured his Honour, he had as lief be without " the bishopric, as to dwell still in that danger. That if it " might be put in arbitrement, he minded to choose none " but him, if he would give him [the Bishop] leave to be " so bold with him." Upon this they go to law. There is a book in the Paper He sues the Office consisting of divers sheets of paper written in Latin, Arthb,sho P- as it seems, of the Bishop's own penning, wherein he ar- gued his own case ; and by his many quotations of the civil law she wed himself very well studied therein. It was en- titled his Allegations, beginning thus: Ad decisionern prcesentis controversies prcemittendum est, quod inter alia, qua: ad curam et solidtudinem providi et vigikmtis pastoris pertinent, curare debent sacratissimi E 50 THE LIFE OF CHAP. Episcopi, ut Ecclesias Cathedrales, aliaque cedificia ad Episcopatum spectantia, ah omni ruina et deformitate con- servent, ut ruinosa rejiciant, diruta et collapsa restaurent. Si enim in privatis cedificiis deformitas omnis vitanda est, ac Reipublicas intersit, ne civitas minis deformetur, (ut C. de JEdificiis privatis L. ii. et F. nequid in loco publico. L. ultima, et ex. de Elect, c. fundamenta §. dig-no: libro vi.) Multdque mag-is interest omnium, ut Ecclesice, quce in lio- norem et cultum Dei Omnipotentis ac Jidelium Christi consolationem ; ubi Christi Jideles divina audire, et Sa- cramenta percipere solent, ah omni deformitatis et mince lube conserventur, ut notant doctores in c. 1. ex. de Ecclesiia cedificandis, Sfc. There is also in the same place another book in Latin, wherein he learnedly labours to confute the witnesses that the two Archbishop's defendants brought to prove the edi- fices were left in sufficient repair when they were translated. The conclusion of which paper ran thus: Ex quibus omni- bus manifeste patet, non esse, [invalidas] out insuffu ientcs Londinensis Episcopi probationes, sed debile ct uifu mum esse illud subterfugium in re tarn manifesta, et omnium oculis objecta, probationes nostras tanquam minus conclu- dentes arguere : cum tamen illi non probaverint se ea Je- cisse quae facere debebant; et proinde eorum culpa hcec con- tigisse prcBSumatur. Juxta L. qui non facit. F. de regulis juris. The charge In the year 1580, a new review was appointed to be pidationl* taken of the dilapidations, when they amounted to about 16021. that is much more than they were when the first view was taken, anno 1577; the charge being then but 1200/. The suit held till 1584, when our Bishop obtained a favour- able sentence : and then the Archbishop of York's last plea was to get the sentence qualified, and to lay part of the bur- den upon the executors of Archbishop Grindal, lately de- ceased. BISHOP AYLMER. 51 CHAP. V. An eartliquake occasions the Bishop to compose certain prayers. He visits. His business with the Lord Rich. His device about appointment of preachers. His counsel for filling the see of Bath and Wells, and other sees: There happened, April the 6th, in the year 1580, an An eartli- earthquake in London and the parts adjacent, and farther quake- off. Camden, in his History of Queen Elizabeth, writes of it, that it was about six in the even, the air clear and calm, in England on this side York, and in the Nether- lands, almost as high as Colen ; when the earth in a mo- ment fell a trembling in such a manner, that in some places stones fell down from buildings, and the bells in the steeples struck against the clappers, and the sea, that was then calm, vehemently tossed and moved to and fro; and the night following the ground in Kent trembled two or three days : and the like again happened May the 1st, in the dead time of the night. The Bishop of London was piously sensible of this, and willing to take this opportunity to call the people to repentance, that such a terrible providence might have a due effect upon them. And indeed this earthquake, together with the present apprehension of the nation's enemies, made a mighty impression upon men's hearts. The Bishop speed- Frames ily upon this, while the matter was warm, and the people ti^oc™- affected with fear and horror, framed prayers to be used in sion - public through his diocese on this occasion; having also some instructions from the Lord Treasurer, by the Queen's order, for the same ; who signified, that she would not have any solemn matter made of it ; meaning not to have a day set apart through the kingdom for it ; but yet some serious notice to be taken of it in the public devotions. In com- pliance with which, the Bishop had composed the prayers aforesaid without any special psalms ; but the psalms to be read according to the common order. The Lord Treasurer, a grave and pious man, signified his mind to the Bishop ra- e 2 58 THE LIFE OF CHAP, ther for some more solemn observation of a day ; or at V " least that all things should be done, as much as might be, to the capacity and edifying of the people. But the Bishop in answer, first thanking God for this Lord's care of so im- portant a thing as the people's spiritual benefit, did never- theless take leave to dissent from him for the keeping of a national day; hecause the state of the time considered, toge- ther with the malice of the enemies, who commonly (though falsely) upbraided the English Protestants, that they never fasted, and seldom prayed ; he held it requisite, without farther delay, to give some order and direction to stir up the people to devotion, and to turn away God's wTath threat- ened hy the earthquake. B u t the compiling of a new form of prayer would ask a longer time ; and therefore he thought it would do more good, if the form already fin- ished were followed ; especially for that the people was then much moved with the present warning: but their nature was such as commonly to make these things but a nine days' wonder : adding, CUo arcscit lacryma ; i. e. A tear soon dries up; and that he might say, multo elfins indole icit ani- mus ; i. e. much sooner does the mind wear off its grief : that it were therefore necessary, that things of this nature should be done out of hand : but yet concluding, that wliat should seem best to his Lordship he was ready to follow. But we return to his dealings with his Clergy. A visitation. In the year 1580 c he instituted an episcopal visitation, which began August 16th, in London; and in the month of November ensuing were divers articles exhibited by the Archdeacon, to be inquired by the ministers, church-war- dens, and sworn men of every parish within the archdea- conry of London; in all the diocese also, in places as well exempt as not exempt, according to the special direction of certain letters, sent to the Bishop from the Lords of the Queen's Privy Council : which articles were as follow, and respected chiefly the Laity, Sectaries, and Papists. Imprimis, Whether there be any in your parish that do c See Additions, Numb. III. BISHOP AYLMElt. 53 refuse to conform themselves in matters of religion, and to C H A P. come to their own parish church, and refuse the Commu- V " nion; and what be their names, and of what condition or Ai tides to estate they are. „f. Item, How long they have refused so to do. Item, How many of their wives, children, servants, or others, sojourning and abiding in their houses, do likewise refuse so to do ; and what be their names and surnames ; and how long they have so done. Item, For what cause they have refused so to do. Item, Of what yearly living in England, or other value of substance or goods, are these principal persons thought to be, in truth and in deed, and not as they be stinted in the suliMclv book. Item, Whether any one or more of them have been now already committed to any prison for such recusancy. Memorandum, This inquisition not to extend to any other than such as do obstinately refuse to come to their parish church, and there to receive the Communion. This inquisition seems to have been set on foot upon the Chiefly for intelligence of the increase of Papists. For those crafty emis- 1>a '" sts - saries of Rome took this opportunity to reconcile as many as they could to the pretended unity of the Church, while the eyes of the State were chiefly upon the dissenting bre- thren, of whom it had a great jealousy about this time. Therefore from henceforth both sorts were equally looked City Minis- unto; and in the month of January 1581, there was a call *g r a s il , lted of the City Ministers, to make inquiry what sons of English gentlemen and others, or what servants were now beyond seas, and to what ends they went ; whether as scholars, or factors, or otherwise. And the same month, namely, Ja- And again, nuary 29th, there was another call of them into the consis- tory by the Bishop of London and ecclesiastical Commis- sioners ; when these injunctions and inquiries were given forth. 1. No invectives to be used of or against estates: [that is, this or other kingdoms, or potentates: some preach- ers, as it seems, being now-a-days very liberal of their speeches both against France and Spain.] 2. None to re- f. 3 54 THE LIFE OF CHAP, fuse the wearing of the surplice. 3. That there be no di- ' minishing or altering the service. 4. Inquiry to be made who did not celebrate the Sacraments together with their preaching; doing the one, but wholly omitting the other. 5. Also, who made alteration in the rites required to be used in Baptism. 6. Who did not catechize the youth. 7. The seventh article related to contentious preachers,- who scandalously gave others the name of dumb dogs. 8. The last related to such as utterly refused to read the Homilies. The Bishop at this assembly shewed himself somewhat ear- nest, and said, he would surely and severely punish the of- fenders in these points, or / zcill lie, said he, in the dust for it. Contends He had a long and troublesome business with a certain Lord Rich, nobleman, a great favourer of the Puritans. It was the a Puritan. L or cl Rich, who about the years 1580 and 1581, had ex- ercises of religion after their way in his house in Essex, one Wright being the preacher ; who seems to have been the same Wright with him of Trinity College in Cambridge, and tutor to the Earl of Essex, both before and at his being at the University ; a sister of which Earl the said Lord Rich had married. These meetings in this Lord's house the Bishop being informed of, opposed and forbade, and by the power he had endeavoured to stop. In his father's time, the former Lord Rich, the Bishop had many storms from him upon the same account : and now his son conti- nued the same practices in his house. This was come by this time to the Queen's ear ; that is, that there were dis- orders practised in Essex, and particularly in that Peer's house ; which she angrily took notice of to the Lord Trea- surer : of which he acquainted the Bishop, and withal, that it was her order and command to him, to take notice of those unlawful exercises, and forbid them. The Bishop took this opportunity, that the Queen might know what troubles he underwent in this her service, by the answer he made to the Treasurer's letters ; therein desiring and entreating that Lord to signify to her Majesty, that he had many great storms with the late Lord Rich ; and that now latelv the BISHOP AYLMER. 55 present Lord Rich, and his bastard uncle, and another, CHAP. aforesaid Wright to preach in his diocese ; but this the Bi- shop utterly denied to do, unless he would subscribe to the orders of this Church. But that Lord's aforesaid uncle did hereupon so shake him up, that he said he was never so abused at any man's hands since he was born. For which he was minded to commit him, as great a person as he was, but that there were not three Commissioners together to do it according to the authority of the Commission : but deter- mined that he [the Bishop] and some of the rest would call him at their first sitting in the term ; for lie considered, the Queen's chief Commissioner was not so contemptuously to be treated for saving the honour of the Princess herself ; and our Prelate's spirit was as great as the greatest. He then gave the Lord Rich warning, that he followed not his uncle's counsel in those matters ; and that if he did, he must needs make her Majesty acquainted with it ; and so he meant to do. His endeavour next was to get Wright their preacher. Wright his But him he could not come by, unless he sent a power of P reacher- men to fetch him out of a nobleman's house ; for he had charged both father and son to send him unto him ; and they promised they would, but never did. Therefore, seeing they of the Commission had done as far as their said Com- mission gave them leave, he hoped her Majesty woidd think the best of their doings, and not suffer them to be defaced by such busy-bodies; or be grieved with them, the Com- missioners, for not doing that which their authority reached not unto. Two years he had been thus struggling with them : but he told the Treasurer, that unless they should pull Wright out by the ears, he knew not how thev should come by him. These things were by the said Treasurer communicated to the Queen ; and so the Bishop desired they might in his own vindication. This business made such a noise, and the Queen so irri 5-jJ ' l, f e ^ e c °, me tated, that it seems Mr. Rich and Mr. Wright aforesaid, Commis- cxam E 4 5i THE LIFE OF CHAP, sioners in the month of October, not long after the fore- X ' mentioned reneounter with the Bishop, which happened in September ; and the Lord Burghley himself, perhaps by the Queen's special order, was present. In November they had these men again before the Bishop and Commission. At this second appearance great proofs were brought against them [i. c. Rich and Wright] concerning their speech about solemnizing the Queen's day, viz. November the 17th ; against Wright, for asking if they would make it an holy day, and so make our Queen an idol : and against Rich, for soothing and maintaining, in very great earnest, the same speeches, and others like to them. For this cause, and for rejecting the book, and many other disorders, the Bishop with the rest of the Commissioners sitting the 7th of No- vember, committed them both ; Wright to the Fleet, and Rich to the Marshalsea : and one Dix, another very disor- dered man, and a violent innovator, (as the Bishop charac- tered him,) was sent to the Gate-house : that he there, and Wright in the Fleet, might exercise their learning against the Papists who lay in those prisons, which hitherto they had broached against their brethren, and against the State. Writes to And having proceeded thus far, the Bishop thought good, ronceming ^ or n ^ s bett er safety in case of false informers, to tell his his doings, tale to the Queen herself in a letter from him and the rest of the Commissioners ; which he did in January following : and that for these reasons, as he signified to the Lord Trea- surer, who seemed not so well to have approved of it, since the Bishop had before desired this Lord to acquaint the Queen with it. First, because the Lord Chancellor had said, it were better it should be known farther. Secondly, he understood the Queen knew of it, and had thought that she had heard nothing before of it as from him. Thirdlv, because it chiefly touched her. Wherefore he and the rest thought good to make her privy to it. Wright ^ l n f] nej ]\f r . Wright, having lain in the Gate-house till xription. September 1582, became willing to subscribe to two arti- cles ; viz. to his good allowance of the ministry of the Church of England, and to the Book of Common Prayer. BISHOP AYLMER 63 Yet one thing more the Bishop required of him ; which CHAP, was, that some of his friends should be bound for him in a ' good round sum, that from henceforth he should neither commit in act, nor preach any thing contrary to the same : and then the Bishop did not mislike that he should have farther favour, so that the Queen were made privy there- unto, whom this offence did chiefly concern. Our Bishop was instrumental, anno 1-581, in setting on His dt-rice foot a verv useful practice in London : namely, that a num- P reatl) - ber of learned, sound preachers might be appointed to preach on set times before great assemblies ; chieflv, I suppose, for the Paul's Cross sermons ; their pains to be spent mainly in confirming the people's judgments in the doctrine and dis- cipline of the present established Church, so much struck at and undermined bv many in these times ; and for the encouragement hereof certain contributions to be made, and settled on them bv the city. This motion was so approved of at Court, and by the Queen especially, that Mr. Beal, a clerk of the Council, was sent from aljove to the Bishop, bringing with him certain notes and articles for the more particular ordering of this business, which he and the eccle- siastical Commissioners were to lay before the Mayor and Aldermen. Sir John Branch was then Mayor ; who, it seems, with the Aldermen, did not much like this motion, for the standing charge it must put the city to. For after much expectation, the Mayor gave the Bishop answer, that his brethren thought it a matter of much difficulty, and al- most of impossibility aJso. Notwithstanding, to draw them to this good purpose, the Bishop had appointed divers con- ferences with them ; but after all concluded, (and so he sig- nified to the Lord Treasurer,) that unless the Lords wrote directly unto them, to let them know it was the Queen's pleasure, and theirs, little would be done in it ; and so a good design overthrown by the might of mammon, as he ex- pressed it. But withal he offered that himself and the rest would, if it pleased them above, proceed farther and do what they could, thinking it pity so good a purpose shoidd 58 THE LIFE OF CHAP, be hindered, where there was so much ability to main- v - tain it. His grave The see of Bath and Wells was now in November 1581 supplying vo ^ tne death of Gilbert Barklay, aged eighty years ; vacant sees, who by reason of his great age, and the affliction of a le- thargy, could not be so diligent as was requisite in so large a diocese, and so inclined to superstition and the Papal reli- gion; which grew the more for want of episcopal inspection, and frequent good instruction. At the same time the dio- cese of Norwich bent much towards innovation, and har- boured such as taught disobedience to the orders of the Church ; which our Bishop, being a Norfolk man born, the more laid to heart. For these causes at this time he se- riously bethought himself, how these things might be sea- sonably remedied by fit Bishops ; and that the Queen's and the Treasurer's consciences might be well discharged in this work of setting governors over the flock of Christ, he in a very grave and bishop-like manner expressed his mind to the said Treasurer in this affair, urging it closely upon him not to neglect so necessary a matter, as he would give ac- count to God for it : advising therefore that Cooper, the Bishop of Lincoln, a learned and active man, might be translated to Bath and Wells ; Freke of Norwich, less fit for that place, to go to Lincoln ; Young, a good governor, Bishop of Rochester, to be removed to Norwich ; and the Dean of Westminster, Dr. Goodman, a man excellently qualified, to succeed to Rochester, to be held hi commaidum with the deanery. And with what good reasons lie backed this his advice, and what deference and yet becoming gra- vity he joined witli it, will appear to him that reads his letter. Thus therefore he accosts that great counsellor : His letter " Right Honourable and my singular good Lord. For- surer'for** " asmuc h as I am in conscience persuaded, that no man that pur- " next to her Majesty hath a greater care for the furnishing p0Se ' " of the Church of Christ with able men, especially to be " Bishops, than you have ; nor any man more able to dis- BISHOP AYLMER. 59 " cern and judge of meet or unmeet persons for such rooms, CHAP. " both for your long experience in the Commonwealth, and V " " for that rare learning that God hath endued you with ; " therefore, as one wishing that the best jewels may be " sought out for the garnishing of Christ's Church, I " thought good to call upon you, (though I need not,) and " to put you in remembrance of that I know you never for- " get, (unless it be through your great and infinite business,) " that it may please you to have a special eye to the be- " stowing of the bishopric of Bath and Wells ; wherein I " will not prescribe, but shew what I wish, to the discharge " of her Majesty's conscience, which I know of itself herein " is tender, and godly, careful for the great advancement of " God's glory, and the profit of his Church. Methink " therefore (pardon me, my good Lord) it were good, if " Lincoln were removed to Bath ; where, for lack of a learned " man, reigneth great ignorance ; and Norwich (who shall " never be able to do any great good where he is) to Lin- " coin, where the diocese is well settled ; and Rochester to " Norwich ; who for his quickness in government, and his " readiness in learning, is the fittest man for that country " that I know ; and especially to bridle the innovators, not " by authority only, but also by weight of argument : and " then to his place Mr. Dean of Westminster, a man every " way very fit for tiny good place ; who having his deanery " in commendam, might marvellous well serve her Majesty " in the room of the Almoner, who now I know, even upon " conscience, would be glad to be with his flock. And so I " think all places would be sufficiently provided, and your " conscience discharged ; to whom I am persuaded the due " looking to this matter specially appertaineth, because you " are learned and zealous. " Therefore in God's behalf, my good Lord, look to it ; " for truly God will require an account of your omission at " your hands. Thus hoping you will forgive me this bold- " ness, I take my leave, most humbly praying God to bless " you many years in this State ; that we all thereby may 60 THE LIFE OF CHAP. " continue to taste of the wonted blessings which God hath V ' " poured upon us by her Majesty's ministry, and your " Christian vigilancy. " Your good Lordship's humbly to command, « JOHN LONDON^ " From my house by Paul's, " November 28, 1581. But all this good plot of the Bishop came to nothing : and notwithstanding this serious incitement, this bishopric laid vacant for almost three years after, (a thing sometimes practised in this Queen's reign, I will not say for the sake of the temporalities,) and then Dr. Goodwin, Dean of Can- terbury, was preferred to it. CHAP. VI. Tlw Bishop's care about tlic Commission. Labours a re- move to Eli/. Several pu- At the commitment of Rich, W right, and Dix, before "^^^J^j mentioned, were present the Bishop, Sir Owen Hopton, ty- Dr. Clark, Dean of the Arches, Dr. Walker, and Dr. Lewen; Dr. Lewis, Dr. Hammond, Mr. Mullins, Arch- deacon of London, and other Commissioners, which ought to have assisted, withdrew themselves ; which weakened their proceedings. But at this sitting, some they had ad- monished, and some suspended, (but not many,) till they should shew themselves conformable in allowing the book. Complains The Bishop observed how in these things, and such other Commis- 8)8 he judged of importance, but odious, their colleagues did sioners that sluink from them ; whereby those few that did assist grew discouraged. He thought fit therefore to let the Lord Treasurer know it, and interpose himself in it. He advised that the Dean of the Arches, who was very active and as- sistant, might be encouraged by his Lordship or the Queen; especially having had little favour from the Court : and the BISHOP AYLMER. Others to be somewhat touclied by his letters for their ab- CHAP sence. He feared thai within a while in such matters of . displeasure, they should have but few to join with them. The Recorder, Mr. Fleetwood, in the term-time seldom or never came amongst them. He also propounded to have some other able and courageous men to be joined with them, as Dr. Dale, Dr. Forth, Civilians, and the Chancellor of London. For he shewed how he saw that other men in weighty matters slipped the collar. At the aforesaid last sitting of the Commissioners they Apparitors made an order, that the Archdeacons, Commissaries, and onsunda ys. Officials, should send their Apparitors from place to place every Sunday, to see what conformity was used in every parish, and to certify. These proceedings the Bishop prayed the Treasurer to impart to the Queen for her better satisfaction, and to understand farther her pleasure in the same. "Which he thought would not be amiss to be done. In the midst of their business in the month of December The Lord 1581, that the Bishop and his colleagues might not do any se ™.ht U cau- thino- to create more displeasure against them and their ,ions to tl,e ° . . ■ o . Bishop. Commission, and that there might be no occasion of appeal- ing from them, the Lord Burghley sent Dr. Lewis, Master of the Bequests, to the Bishop, to advise him not to meddle with many matters, by virtue of their Commission, but sucli only as concerned religion. Which direction, mixed with so much wisdom and moderation, and proceeding from so great a counsellor, the Bishop received in very good part ; and to demonstrate what a grateful sense he had of it, he despatched his mind in these words, viz. " That he agreed with his Lordship in judgment, as one His answer '• by whom he had ever desired to be directed, and would thereu P° ni " be still, if it pleased him to grant him that favour that he " might. For his wisdom, zeal, experience, learning, and " godliness, (he thanked God,) he accounted to be such, " and himself in all such so mean, that he would think him- " self happy to be directed by him. And therefore my " good Lord (as he added) do but let me in sucli points " know your pleasure, and by God's grace I shall be as THE LIFE OF CHAP. " ready to accomplish it as any whosoever either love you VI " " or lionour you. And so the Lord pour his rich blessings " upon you and yours to his glory, 11 &c. The Bishop Jt was s tiU the Bishop that moved this body, the rest !tay g o7 the being ready to slip away from the work, had not he still Commis- appeared, and acted vigorously, and carried the Commis- sioners along with him. For he was absent but once by reason of a pain in his eyes, and there was no sitting, to the great murmuring and charges of the suitors. The civil lawyers that were of the Commission neglected the public, and looked after their private affairs, where their gains most lay. But the Dean of the Arches, and Hopton, who was Lieutenant of the Tower, continued verv diligent. And the Bishop on these considerations moved the Lord Trea- surer to write a letter to the Registrar, a little to touch the slackness of the Commissioners, naming none, and giving some commendations unto Dr. Clark and Sir Owen Hopton, who onlv were painful. And that his Lordship would here- by greatly farther the service. The success And indeed by his diligence and patience he was a great o l. pams. ; nstrument> m obedience to the Queen, to quell and take down these men, who set themselves against the ecclesiasti- cal order, notwithstanding all their endeavours and interest at Court against him : which he remembered to the Lord Treasurer as a good office that he had done, for which the Queen, he reckoned, ought to favour him, and not to give ear to every information given against him and the Com- missioners ; but to consider into what peaceable tranquillity God, by his poor service, as he said, had brought not only London, and the whole diocese, but also the most part of England, since he came to that place : whereby he had, as he thought in his conscience, rather deserved her gra- cious favour than discouragement. For on the other side he expressed how he was hated like a dog, and was called the oppressor of the children of God. Meets with By this it appears that he laboured at this time under some Court" at tUscoun tenance at Court, the Puritans commonly raising a dust there against the Bishops that favoured them not. BISHOP AYLMER. as A \ liner had indeed a cause depending now before the CHAP. Queen and Council, upon some complaint as it seems for V a pretended injuring of the revenues of the bishopric by felling great quantities of wood. This was in the year 1581, these accusations were mixed with much falsehood, creating him great trouble. But the Lord Burghley here stood his friend to the Queen, and stuck to him heartily. Which kindness of his so overcame the Bishop, that he could not sufficiently express his gratitude ; writing thus to him ; " My good Lord, I cannot but honour you for car- " rying yourself with so great equity before her Majesty in my late cause. You have so won my heart, (though God " is my witness you had it before,) that you shall be the " man to whom I will trust, (under God,) whom I will only " choose for my judge in all cases, and honour as my most " noble friend at all times ; and in some part be thankful, " as I may, but never as you deserve." Thus did this good man's soul run out, as though it had been melted down with the seasonable kindness of this noble person; whose up- rightness was such, that he used not to favour any, but those whose innocency or other circumstances required it. But the Bishop plainly saw how liable he was to these Labours a troubles while he remained Bishop of London, and how remove ' subject to the inconvenience of slanderous tongues and ma- licious informations, which had too much ear at Court. The labour and attendance also of the Commission was too heavy for him, now become old. Wherefore he endeavoured long for a remove to another diocese : which he had been harping upon ever since the year 1579 : for then he was earnest with the Lord Treasurer to procure him a transla- tion either to Ely or Winchester. But because the former hung upon uncertain points, (Bishop Cox of Ely being yet alive, and there being a design to take away some of the revenues of that see, to which the Bishop incumbent was to agree,) therefore he chose to decline that ; and disclosed his wishes unto the Treasurer, that Dr. Day, the present Bishop of Winchester, might be removed to London, and he in his room to Winchester ; and that his Lordship should THE LIFE OF CHAP, find him as thankful as any that ever received benefit at his Vl " hands. And that being so near lie might assist the Bishop of London, which peradventure would be some ease to him, and not unprofitable for the ecclesiastical government, lie hath the But afterward his eye lay chiefly upon Ely, (the change Ely. with Winchester it seems not being to be expected.) He had in the languishing time of Cox, Bishop of that see, made interest with the Lord Treasurer to be invested in it, when the present incumbent should die. And as for this suit which the Treasurer made for our Bishop, the Queen granted it : and so Secretary Walsingham told him. There- fore the good Bishop of Ely being dead, two days after his death, that is, July 24, 1581, the Bishop despatched a letter to his before-mentioned friend at Court to promote now his remove, having certain news of Cox's departure. " And he " thought fit now, as he wrote, to remind him, that as by " his Lordship's only means he had at her Majesty's hands " then a yea, so by some sinister working her gracious fa- " vour were not turned into a nay. He added, that he " would not seek the place as he did, but that he found in " himself some imperfection in body and mind, being then " homo sexagcnarius : and that he found in himself, that " within a short time he should never answer her Majesty's " expectation, nor his own conscience, in that place of ser- " vice which hitherto had been so tedious, that he hoped " her Majesty even of justice would recompense him, though " not with gain, yet with ease in these his crooked years/ 1 It was about this time that the Queen was in the mind to remove him to Worcester, and in his room to have preferred Dr. Richard Bancroft, Archbishop Whitgift's Chaplain, an active man, and made much use of in the ecclesiastical Com- mission. But whatever the matter was, this came to no- thing. Solicits his He continued soliciting this business till April 1582, a hen n-uiove to j le lj e gg ec l Q f t ne aforesaid Lord a remove upon account of his age, and the greatness of the business of London, much fitter for a younger man than he. The said Nobleman had stirred in this business for him; and now he entreated him BISHOP AYLMER. 65 that he would finish that which he had so favourably hi- CHAP, therto followed ; desirous to be delivered of this heavy bur- VI ' den, as he called it, of London. The bishopric of Ely had been now void for a pretty long time ; which he was con- tented to succeed into. He desired now in the beginning of the year, that the business might be finished, since he once had the Queen's promise for it. He pleaded, now was the time for him to settle himself for his provision either here or there : which must at this time be considered of both for the successor's commodity, and his own. He added, how this ensuing summer would much hinder the state of that living, both the parks and elsewhere. And he heard that great swarms both of Papists and of the family of love did daily increase there, for lack of one to look unto such dis- orders. But alas ! these were not sufficient reasons to fill that vacant see while there wanted not men about the Queen that suggested to her the ample revenues of it. And Bishop Aylmer seemed not to be for their turn ; that is, to submit to the alienation of some of the lands and lordships of it. So that however he called this his long looked for suit, and thought it now upon a despatch, yet he was de- ceived. But still he gave it not over; for in October the next Solicits year I find him labouring: with the Treasurer in the same aga ! n the » » next year. cause: who furthered it again with the Queen, and got some good probability of it. So that the Bishop hung in suspense, and could not settle to make his provisions in any place. He pleaded again his years; and that that place of London had need of a younger man than he was. And at last he was so near his desired remove, that his conge dclirc seemed only deferred a little, because he was con- cerned in a commission for the reparation of Paul's, which by his departure thence might probably receive some hin- drance ; and because the Queen's audit for the temporalities of that bishopric of Ely was at hand. But the Bishop an- swered, that as for the first, the action would follow his person ; and that it was to be answered at Ely as well as at London. And as to the second, that the audit would be F 06 THE LIFE OF CHAP, past before he could do his homage; and so the conge V1 " (Telire could not be hindrance to that. But this business still stuck ; and finally came to nothing. Fed with However he was always fed with hope to succeed at last ; hope ' calling it therefore his long- lingering hope. For in June 1585, the Lord Treasurer sent him word by a certain Lord, that he had it in his mind and purpose to purchase him some more ease in his old years ; adding many favourable speeches concerning him. Which revived again in him the sense of this great man's honourable countenance towards him ever since he came to that restless see, or eurfpus, as he chose to call his bishopric, and the constant continuance of his favour and furtherance in that long lingering hope of his, which his Lordship and some other of his friends had divers times set on foot for him. Troubled It was mentioned a little above, that our Bishop had a fnforaiers uusmess depending at Court, concerning some complaint made against him for embezzling his woods. Which was the second time these informations were made to the Coun- cil or Star-chamber against him. Of which nevertheless he had a discharge ; and the Lord Treasurer shewed himself therein his greatest friend. The great informer now against him was one Litchfield, a Court musician, who was the in- former of cutting down of the elms in Fulham. But the Bishop was so confident of his own innocency in this busi- ness, that he prayed the Lord Treasurer, that he would procure that he might answer any adversary he had : and he doubted not but he should clear himself. Indeed for his lewd officers, which he had then in suit, he could not so well answer. The woods in the park were better than they were before his time. And for the out woods he did his best (both by suit of law, and by diligent looking to them) to meet with the outrage of the borderers ; who indeed had sought to spoil them, so much as in them lay. And in truth a great share of that timber that had been felled since his time was done by the woodwards : who having by his predecessor a large grant of fees by the name of dead trees, starveling trees, sear trees, and such as were in decay, car- BISHOP AYLMER. 67 lied away all the timber there. For as he, since her Ma- CHAP, jesty's restraint, had not felled nor sold one tree, so under the terms aforesaid the woodwards had carried away above an hundred, which were good timber trees. For indeed there were few or no timber trees then within his parks, but either sear, starveling, or half dead. Therefore by the ri- gour of his patent the woodward should have all, and the Bishop none, by reason of the prohibition : whereas neither law nor conscience, as the Bishop himself argued, could otherwise interpret his grant, than that he should have fire- wood only, and no timber. But the Bishop had not only this wrong done him, but all was laid upon his neck, though it were other men's faults. So that in fine he desired to come to his answer against any man that should take upon him to charge him. And as for Litchfield, in truth he wanted twenty timber trees, and requested them of the Bishop. But the Bishop refused to give them : which if he had granted, as he plainly told the Treasurer, it would have ended all this matter. But this man soon after died. He it was that blazed abroad the report of the Bishop's The elms in felling of the elms about the palace at Fulham : but it was Fulham - a shameful untruth. And how false it was, all the Court Admoni- knew, and the Queen herself could witness. For she had p^ptetf* lately lodged at the palace there ; where she misliked no- England, thing, but that her lodgings were kept from all good pros-T^Que,,! pect by the thickness of the trees, as she told her Vice- lodges at Chamberlain ; and he reported so to the Bishop. And Dr. Fulham - Pern, Dean of Ely, being at a great man's table soon after, and hearing much railing discourse against the Bishop for his felling the elms at Fulham, asked one of the company, being an ancient lawyer, how long the elms at Fulham had been felled ; " Some half a year ago", said the lawyer. " Then replied Pern, " they are marv ellously grown in that time. " For I assure you, I was there within these four days, and " they seem to be two hundred years old." And then he took occasion likewise to repeat the passage mentioned be- fore, how the Queen complained of her prospect hindered by the trees. And therefore that storv that commonlv f 2 G8 THE LIFE OF CHAP, went, and is mentioned by Martin Marprelate, and Sir V1 ' J ohn Harrington, is false : namely, that Madox should tell Brief view, the Bishop, that his name was Elmar, but it might well be Mar-elm, for that he had marred all the elms in Fulham. For Madox, who dwelt at Fulham, well knew that the elms were not felled at all: or perhaps but two or three of the decayed ones. Which might give umbrage to the clamour. CHAP. VII. The Bishop celebrates the 17th of November. Slandered. Papists have mass in prison. Goes his visitation. Sus- pends one HucMe. Suit with his predecessor for dilapi- dations. Thomas Cartwright taken up. BlJT now let us look a little back, and observe some of the Bishop's doings in the dispensation of his office, and in other matters that befell him in the years 1583, 1584, and 1585. TheQueen's I n the year 1583, the Queen's day, that is, the 17th of ntJedat 1 " November, fell on a Sunday : which the Bishop resolved to Paul's. celebrate with all the becoming solemnity that so great a mercy as her access to the crown deserv ed. Therefore he obtained the favour of Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, to preach that day at St. Paul's ; and that the great Lords of the Court might honour the auditory with their presence, he invited them after the sermon to dine Avith him ; virs. the Lord Chancellor, and the Lord Treasurer Burghley, the Earl of Leicester, and other great personages. His enemies j n the beginning of November divers of the Council de- sired to speak with the Bishop, that they might be better informed about his matter, (that is, somewhat that his ene- mies had accused him of.) And in the issue he found at their Lordships' hands great justice with honourable favour : and so came off with much reputation. But, however, this BISHOP AYLMER. 09 appearance before the Counsellors gave occasion to the fac- CHAP, turn to boast, and to bruit abroad that the Bishop of Lon-____ don was called before the Council, and there chidden, and what not ; as though this had been in respect of his severe actings in the Commission. However false this was, the Bishop, being a man of a stout and somewhat hasty spirit, was inwardly vexed; and thought this talk arose partly from his being before so many of the Council ; which made the matter look somewhat criminal on his side. Therefore Hjs^ request for the future, to prevent any such surmises, he prayed the Lord Burghley, that hereafter, if there should be occasion, he might be called before him, and some one of the Coun- cil; or else he must, as he said in some heat, with their good Lordships' 1 favour, give over sitting in the Commis- sion : and moreover wished earnestly that the Archbishop were in the Commission ; for he, for his part, was deadly weary. Accordingly the Commission was renewed in De- cember, and the Archbishop put in to help to bear the burden. The Bishop was troubled at this time with Popish Priests Papists in and Jesuits, who lay in the prisons in and about London, ven'many" and especially the Marshalsea ; being now replenished with these dangerous underminers of the quiet state of the realm, and disowners of the Queen's supremacy. These, though by the laws they were liable to the death of traitors, yet the Queen cared not to spill their blood, but rather to keep them up in restraint from doing mischief abroad, by their massing and suggesting evil counsels against religion and the Queen's just authority. But though they were thus in hold, under an easy confinement, they followed their ap- pointed business, commonly saying mass, and enticing the youth of London unto them, to the Bishop's great grief when he understood it ; and especially that they were daily reconciled. One of these, named Hartly, was more busy than the rest ; whom he therefore shut up, and laid irons upon him, till he should hear from above what course to take hereafter in this matter. Our Bishop's triennial visitation happened this year, 1583. Visits. f 3 70 THE LIFE OF CHAP. June the 21st he visited his London Clergy at St. Paul's; ' where Dr. Walker, one of the Archdeacons, preached. Then was required of them generally a new subscription. That which he discovered this visitation, among other things that were faulty, and required correction, was the practice complains of the commutation of penance ; much practised in his dio- tatimi of 1 " cese D y Chancellors, Commissaries, Officials, Registers, even penance. t Q j ne very Apparitor. And these commutations were so many, and sometimes so strange, that he feared it would be a means to let in all manner of vice; which like a flood (unless prevented) was in danger to overspread the whole realm ; especially the wealthier sort, who might be as bad as they pleased, when they should think they might be saved from punishment by their mammon. And this was done notwithstanding a late Convocation had expressly or- dered, that there should be no commutation of penance with- out the Bishop of the diocese's privity. And in this abuse even the highest courts ecclesiastical were not clear. His advice Of all this the Bishop, being now at Hadham in Hert- forming fordshire, (as it seems in his visitation,) informed the Lord thereof. Treasurer ; and, for the redressing of this evil, desired the said Lord, together with the Council, to direct their letters to the High Commissioners ecclesiastical : that where in the last Convocation at the last Parliament order had been taken by the Bishops of the realm then and there assembled, that no commutation of penance should be made without the Bishop should be made acquainted ; (which thing was not at all observed,) therefore their Lordships' pleasure was, that the said Commissioners should examine all manner of ecclesiastical officers, what and how many penances they had commuted and changed within six or seven years past. The benefit whereof, according as the Bishop propounded it, might be, that these commutations being refunded, (which he concluded to be very considerable,) should go towards the reparation of the ruinous church of St. Paul's; "which " would well help to make good a good piece of it. And " besides, by this means all ecclesiastical officers would," as he said, " be more precise in bargaining for sin, and all sin- BISHOP AYLMER. 71 " ners would be more afraid of punishment : God's name CHAP. •• would be loss dishonoured, and the chief of the Clergy, V1 ^' " which were therein most blamed, should, he hoped, shew " themselves of all others to have least gain : or else let " them bear," said he, " the burden of their deserts." This letter was writ in July. Thus honestly and discreetly did our Bishop advise for the cure of this corruption of dis- cipline : but what effect it had I cannot say. In the foresaid visitation the Bishop silenced one Huckle, Silenoeth a a Minister in his diocese; a person who it seems before, for Minister! divers years past, had been complained of in his archdea- con's and commissary's courts. He was a busy man, trans- gressing the orders appointed in the Church, and an enemy to the peace of it ; an impugner of the book, and a gather- er of night-conventicles, and more lately a busy disputer against Athanasius's Creed. Him therefore, when the Bi- shop himself could not reclaim him, he suspended from his preaching. And he declared that he was the more in fear of him, because he was but an indifferent scholar, and so the more easily carried into error. But notwithstanding, this man, after having laid some time under suspension, got friends at the Council-board ; who in May 15S4- sent then- letter to our Bishop to restore bun again. But he shew ed himself herein a man not to be warped from doing his duty by any authority. . For with all deference making his an- swer to the said letter, he shew ed them w hat the man w as, according as was said before, and therefore how dangerous to be readmitted to his office. And finally, that he hoped their Lordships woidd permit him to use his discretion in ordering such offenders, unknown to them, but much com- plained of to him. But that he might avoid displeasure, he applied to the Lord Treasurer, who had been absent from the Council, letting him know what he had done, that if occasion were, he might interpose a seasonable word in the Council, as he knew he would do in all matters of justice and equity. George Giffard, Minister at Maiden, was also about this Another time (viz. in the year 1584) suspended from preaching and b^^f 1 f 4 n THE LIFE OF CHAP, administering the Sacraments ; for refusing to subscribe the ' Articles, which all the Clergy were obliged to subscribe to, c'"ff?d O Se tnere oem g some things in the Book of Common Prayer Minister of which he was not persuaded of to be agreeable to the word Maiden. Q £ q 0( j. Information also was given against him to the Bishop, that he taught disobedience to magistrates, used conventicles, and secret teachings, and divers other things worthy of sharp reprehension. This man was a great and diligent preacher, and much esteemed by many, and of good rank in the town, and had brought that place to more sobriety and knowledge of true religion : insomuch that many of his hearers obtained from the Lord Treasurer a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury in his behalf. But the Arch- bishop shewed the said Lord, that Giffard was a ringleader of the rest ; and that he had received certain complaints against him, to the answering whereof they of the High Commission did intend to call him : and that his deserts might be such as would deserve deprivation ; and therefore he thought it not convenient to grant him any farther li- berty or release of his suspension, until he had purged him- self. The Bishop of London also had sent the Archbishop an account of certain crimes charged upon him, wherefore he had suspended and restrained him; which the Arch- bishop also sent to the Treasurer. This happened in May 1584. Restored. It was not long after, that Giffard was brought to answer before the High Commission ; and his accusers were heard, and he, in his own vindication, by certain discreet men ap- pointed by their letters. But his enemies could not prove any of their accusations to be true. Whereupon the Bishop restored him to his preaching. Suspended But this was not the end of this Preacher's troubles ; for ' upon some new complaint he was a second time suspended. Then a long and large petition was put up to the Bishop in his behalf, signed with the hands of two and fifty persons ; A large tes- whereof two were Bailiffs of the town, two Justices of the him°by hu P eace > four Aldermen, fifteen head Burgesses, and the Vicar auditors, of the town. In their petition they shewed how the former BISHOP AYLMER. 73 accusations appeared so false, that his Lordship had set him CHAP, at liberty to preach after a suspension: that they themselves. V11 ' and many others, had been nourished and strengthened in many good graces by his doctrine ; and that the outrage of many notorious sins, commonly practised before his coming, was abated and suppressed, to the great glory of Almighty God, and the comfort of their weak consciences : that it was the profane and wicked sort, that ceased not in their great rage and malice both to his person and religion, to accuse him in slanderous and unjust reports; and therefore, that they could not but in a godly charity towards the man, and for the better information of his Lordship, soundly and rightly to judge of him and his cause, to certify him, that they and many others of his usual auditory never received from him any other but true and sound doctrine to their judgments; and that he always in preaching and catechiz- ing taught outward obedience to princes and magistrates; that he preached and catechized in no other place than in the church ; that he used no conventicles ; and that in his life he was modest, discreet, and unreprovable : by which good and gracious means there was wrought a godly con- formity of the people, to the great benefit of the town, and of the Church of God. And to confirm this their report to be true, they reminded his Lordship, how the same GiflFard their Preacher was con- vented before him and others the Queen's Commissioners, not long since, upon these and other like accusations, none of which his accusers could prove to be true ; and that he, the said Bishop, restored him to his preaching: and therefore they most humbly begged, out of that godly care which they hoped to find at his hands for the benefit of their souls, that he would vouchsafe them his restitution. This Gif-Giffard fard, however he were a Puritan, wrote very well against ™l„ st Barrow, and the separatists, and the pleas and pretences Barrow, urged by them for withdrawing from the public communion of the Church. I cannot proceed farther in relating the issue of this business, but conclude, it appearing a slander, the Bishop restored him. 74 THE LIFE OF CHAP. Here it comes in place to relate the issue of a law-suit, VI1- commenced between this Bishop, and Sandys, late Bishop Casts Arch- of London, now Archbishop of York, whereof mention was Sandys for made before. It was for dilapidations of St. Paul's church. tions' da SU ' t Was £ reat ' l° n g» an( ^ chargeable. At length the Queen, who had a great care of Paul's, granted a special Commission for the examining and proceeding in the matter. And in the year 1584 the Archbishop was cast, by sentence of the judges delegates, to pay to the present Bishop 900 or 1000Z. for the repairs of the said church. And this was the sum Sandys's predecessor in the see of London, viz. Archbishop Grindal, had allowed him for his dilapidations. But after sentence, the Secretary, who was one of the delegates, was for a delay of the execution for a time, upon pretence the same was not just ; and laboured that the Archbishop might obtain another commission for a new examination of the matter, before the former sentence were executed ; and that His reasons because the Archbishop did pay a quarto. To this the newborn- Bishop urged many things : " as that the authority of a mission. « sen t ence being once given might not be called in question " by the same judges, neither by any other, but a superior "judge. For that when sentence is once given, the law " saith, Quod judex functus est officio suo ; and hath no " other thing to do but to execute : otherwise there would " never be an end or certainty of any suit ; but that the " authority of judges would be eluded, and the travail and " cost of the parties utterly lost. That the judges in this " case might not stay execution upon pretence that the same " is unjust, or upon colour that the Archbishop might ob- " tain another commission for a new examination ; for that " it was not likely that the Queen would grant a new com- " mission in this case, because the same had not hitherto " been granted in any like case ; and that if there were anv " hope to obtain such commission, yet the former judges " ought to proceed to execution of their sentence, until such " time they were inhibited. That learned writers did say, " that the denying of this execution was a contempt to the " superior that committed the cause, an injury to the party BISHOP AYLMER. 75 " that sought for execution, and charged the judges which CHAP. " so denied justice, to answer all such damages as the party VI1, " sustained for lack of execution. Moreover, that the judges " delegates, in deciding and determining the matter, had used " great pains, travail, and diligence, to understand the truth " both in fact and in law ; and after great and long delibe- " ration had given a just, discreet, and indifferent sentence. " That whereas Mr. Secretary made a scruple of quarta, the " truth was, the Archbishop paid not after the rate of octava " nor duodecimo,. That it was strange that the said Secre- " tary, who was not learned in the laws, should stick and " swerve from the rest of his colleagues, seeing he had given " sentence jointly with the rest. Farthermore, that the Bi- " shop of London and his executors shoidd be charged for " ever with the sum of money that was adjudged by the " sentence, as with that which he had received, or might " receive ; and could not any way be discharged against the " church, or against his successor, but by employing the " same upon the church : and that even then the Commis- " sioners for Paul's, by their letters to the Bishop, did ear- " nestly urge present payment thereof to be made : that the " decays of the church were such as required speedy and " present reparation." Yet after all this, the Bishop offered, that if the two Archbishops (who had been Bishops of Lon- don before him) would bear him harmless, he would be con- tented to hold himself satisfied. The Bishop and the other ecclesiastical Commissioners The Bishop were inclined to release out of prison certain Popish Priests, ^Xmeutof whereof there were not a few now in custody; and that as tl,c j ud ? es , .... . , . .... , concerning it seems by some intimation from above, being unwilling the certain Vn- rigour of the law should take place upon them. But the pists " Bishop doubted whether they might safely extend this fa- vour to them ; and therefore the opinion of the judges was required in this matter. This was in the beginning of the year 1585, when it was delivered by the said judges in the Star-chamber, the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Treasurer present, viz. that they, being upon condemnation according THE LIFE OF CHAP, to the statute in execution for the Queen, the Commission VI1 ' had no more to do with them. Vauce, a It was not long after, that the Bishop had one Vauce, an Priest. °ld Popish Priest, and divers others of that order before him, whom the Commission found guilty and obnoxious to the law as criminals, and so in danger of death. In the behalf of this Vauce, who was not so bad as the rest, the Lord Treasurer had interceded with the Bishop for his de- liverance. And the Bishop pitied the old fellow, as he called him, who was not the worst, though bad enough. But yet dared not to take upon him to deal with him or any other in the like state for their liberty, remembering what the judges lately had declared in the Star-chamber. And so he signified back to the said Treasurer. And that there- fore it lay before him and the rest of the Lords of the Privy Council, and thence it must come, and not from them of the Commission. Takes up Thomas Cartwright in these days was the chief head of the Puritan, the Puritan faction; a man of a bold spirit, and a running pen. He had writ some books against the hierarchy esta- blished by law in the English Church, whereby he had given great offence, and made himself obnoxious to the laws. This man Bishop Aylmer had lately taken and com- mitted to prison ; which, according to his constant practice, he acquainted the Lords with by the Clerk of the Council. And thinking to decline thereby displeasure from himself or the Commission, he took him up by warrant from the Queen ; who in truth was incensed against him. And he sent the Lords word, that he did it by her order. But the Queen took this in evil part, and was very angry that he used her name to the Lords. This the good Bishop took to heart, and thus made his complaint to the Lord Treasurer, his constant friend, expostulating with him for what he had done, and begging his endeavours to appease the Queen's indignation. The Queen " I understand myself to be in some displeasure with her wTthllfm " Majesty about Mr. Cartwright, because I sent word to BISHOP AYLMER. 77 " your Lordships by the Clerk of the Council, that I com- CHAP. " mitted him by her Majesty's commandment. Alas ! my VJ *' " Lord, in what a dilemma stood I, that if I had not shew- " ed that warrant, I should have had all your displeasures, " which I was not able to bear : and using it for my shield, " (being not forbidden by her Majesty,) I am blamed for " not taking upon me a matter, wherein she herself would " not be seen. Well, I leave it to God, and to your wisdom " to consider in what a dangerous place of service I am. " But God whom I serve, and in whose hands the hearts " of princes are, as the rivers of waters, can and will turn " all to the best; and stir up such honourable friends as " you are to appease her Highness' s indignation." Perhaps the Bishop's enemies took their opportunity now charged to buzz in the Queen's ears slanders and misreports against ^"l"^^^ him : whereof one M as, that he had spoiled the revenues of tj»e iiisiiop- the bishopric ; and how he was noted for this, she bade the Archbishop of Canterbury let him know from her. This was in August. Apprehending well how this tended to his great discredit, and knowing his innocency herein, and the good service he had done in truth to the bishopric, he drew up a brief note of particulars, which he communicated to the Treasurer, and to some other persons of honour, his friends, to shew that he was so far from impairing the bi- shopric, that he had bettered it in divers respects : and that so it would easily appear, whensoever the matter should come to trial, that he had by no means diminished it, but increased it considerably. And he applied to the said Trea- surer, beseeching him even in equity to weigh what wrong he had sustained by such reports, and, as occasion should serve, to let her Majesty understand that all was not true that had been reported. In the month of October following, another business fell A contro- out to our Bishop, by the instigation of some troublesome t^" c y n b th e persons unknown, which created some controversy between Queen and the Queen and him. But herein the Bishop shewed him- a vicarage, self a true friend to his poor Clergy, and withal a tight maintainer of the rights of his bishopric. The case was 78 THE LIFE OF CHAP. this. One Houseman, Vicar of Canwedon in Essex for thirty VII. years, was complained of to the Lord Treasurer and other the Barons in the Exchequer-chamber, at Mr. Attorney General's information, for a supposed intrusion and wrong holding the said vicarage from her Majesty. The Vicar applied to his diocesan ; who, having examined his ancient records, found that his predecessors, the Bishops of Lon- don, from time to time, for two hundred years agone and more, had some interest in the patronage of that vicarage by nomination ; and now belonged unto him. Wherefore he engaged himself in this affair, and signified to the said Lord Treasurer his right by his own letter. And that he was informed by learned counsel, that the said suit or complaint could not by law be held or maintained there before him the Lord Treasurer, but was to be returned by trial at common law, where all matters of like nature had usually been heard and determined. Therefore, taking the case upon himself, he moved the said Lord, that he might find such favour, (if, as he added, by law or justice it might be,) that he would either dismiss the Vicar absolutely from his Lordship's Court of the Exchequer; or else, that he would return him with his cause to the common laws of the realm. " Where," said the Bishop, " he for his possession, " and I for the right of myself and of my successors in the " patronage of that vicarage, may use such defence as the " law doth permit us." A Presby- Another thing happened in this year ] 585, that gave Itliatfieid. some concern also to our careful Bishop. It was a Pres- bytery set up within his diocese, at Hatfield Peverel in Essex ; the head and teacher whereof was one Carew. Of him and his congregation such information was brought to the Bishop and his fellow-Commissioners, that they could not but summon divers of them, and after examination commit them. But before their commitment he repaired to the Lord Treasurers house at London, and acquainted him with these persons, and their disor Jerly principles and prac- tices. Whereat he replied in one or two short words taken out of the Scripture, Habetis legem, &C. Whereby he seemed BISHOP AYLMEU. 79 to think them worthy of the Commissioners proceeding with CHAP, them. For as for Carew, he took upon him to preach with- V>1 ' out authority, nay, against authority : but this was not all, Enormities but he contemned all ecclesiastical censures ; he was elected doctrine" 5 * by the people, and practised a Presbytery. He defaced the of their Book of Public Prayers and Administration of the Sacra- ments. He utterly denied that article of the faith, that Christ descended into hell. He held to the Bishop's face, that the Queen had no authority to make ecclesiastical laws. He maintained, they must continue in division, because Christ saith, Non veni mittere pacem, sed gladium : i. e. / came not to send peace, but a sword. He put several good gentlemen and others from the Communion, when (as the Bishop wrote in his letter to the Treasurer about him) there was more need to allure them to it. He ignorantly and heretic-ally held against the Bishop, that the soul of man was of the substance of God; and so consequently that it was infinite : and the soul of the reprobate being damned, the substance of God should be damned ; with infinite such other errors, as the learned Bishop shewed him, whereinto he fell through ignorance and arrogancy. Nor could he speak three words of Latin. As for his people, he had brought them to that point, that they said, even at Baptism, that it made no matter for the water, so we have the word. And divers of them denied to join with the congregation in praying for the Queen ; and irreverently sat with their heads covered, in spite of good order, when others kneeled and prayed for her. The noise of these men was so great in the parts adja- His dealing cent, that the Earl of Sussex, who lived at New-hall, not at Hatfield - far off, signified to the Archbishop of Canterbury their great evil example. After these innovators were committed, the Archbishop and the Bishop took care to send down preach- ers to Hatfield, and one to read the book, according to the law. And however greatly they had offended, they were offered to be bailed upon these conditions : that Allen, the layman, would not disturb the preachers that were appointed to preach there, nor disquiet the Minister in reading the 80 THE LIFE OF CHAP, service, and that Carew preached no more in his diocese ' without licence. But in January these persons had the confidence to make their complaint to the Council against these proceedings, according to their custom : and some friends they had there. This when the Bishop understood, he wrote to the Lord Treasurer, who now seemed with others to shew them favour, importing, that they were com- mitted by a great bench, both of divines, civdians, and com- mon lawyers. That if his Lordship understood out of the registry and otherwise, of them and their behaviour, he thought the other would as much mislike them as they did. He shewed him the reasonable conditions made them for their enlargement ; and at length in some heat he added, " that if those were suffered, the Church and the realm " would be so disturbed, as it was never yet since her Ma- " jesty's reign. That if the Lords of the Council thought " that the Bishop and his Commission would deal too hardly " with diem, he prayed, in God's name, that the Archbishop " of Canterbury and the Commissioners there at Lambeth " might examine it, and inform the Lords how they found " it there ; and the Bishop declared he and the rest would " be ready to exhibit the whole proceedings before them. " Finally concluding with these words, that if this foul and " contemptuous fact were suffered, he for his part must " yield up to her Highness all authority which they had " received at her hand." Composes a This year, 1585, the nation was much afflicted with un- present oc-" seasonable wet weather, and dispirited by fears arising from casion. foreign enemies, the Queen of Scots, and the plots laid for Queen Elizabeth's life, on which so much depended the peace of England. This gave occasion to the Bishop to compose, or cause to be composed, a form of prayer, very pious and well expressed, and of good length, consisting of seven pages, and being one continued prayer; and re- commended to be used in private families as well as in pub- lic. It was entitled, " A necessary and godly Prayer, by the " Right Reverend Father in God, John, Bishop of London, " to be used throughout all his Diocese upon Sundays and BISHOP A YLMEK. 81 Fridays; for the turning away of God's wrath, as well CHAP, concerning this untemperate weather, and rain lately V11 ' " fallen - upon the earth, as also all other plagues and " punishments which for our manifold sins we most justly " deserve. Most needful to be used of every housholder " and his family throughout the realm. 11 It began, " O " Almighty God, and most merciful Father, we most hum- " bly prostrate ourselves before thy mercy-seat, 11 &c. The Bishop was now, together with the Lord Mayor, The Bishop using his interest in the city of London to pacify a mur-^'*'-^ muring and discontent among the citizens, occasioned by the citize » s great multitude of poor strangers that fled thither, by rea-the strang- son of the persecution of religion in those parts whence ers - they came. The tradesmen were apprehensive how injuri- ous they would prove to them by underworking and under- selling them, and getting part of the business from them. Of this dissatisfaction some good men at the Court were very sensible ; and the Lord Treasurer wrote to Secretary Walsingham about it ; who thereupon procured letters from the Council to the Bishop and the Mayor, that they would use all means to make the strangers better liked of in Lon- don : an account of which Walsingham gave to the Trea- surer in these words : " That he was sorry to find by his " Lordship's letters, that the repair of the poor afflicted " strangers was so greatly grudged at, seeing for their sakes " (for that God had used this realm as a sanctuary for them) " he had bestowed so many extraordinary blessings upon " us ; and that both the Bishop and the Mayor had re- " ceived letters from the Board, to use all good means that " might be, to remove the dislike of the vulgar sort. 11 This letter was written November 4, 1585 ; and the Bishop, who himself was once an exile for religion, no question heartily espoused this business. In the summer of the year 1586, the Bishop went his Holds a vi. next triennial visitation, to take account in what state the sitation - Ministers and people of his diocese were; and had, as it seems, some intimation from the Queen, especially to have regard to those that dissented from the established order, THE LIFE OF CHAP, who now were reported to her to be very strong in their ^ n " numbers, and to act very disorderly in some parts of Essex. Visits in He held his visitation in London, May the 22d. Then the Ministers there were enjoined the observation of these articles. l.To use prayers Wednesdays and Fridays. 2. To read and preach such sermons and homilies as were proper to move compassion to the poor. 3. To make contributions among themselves at free choice according to their abilities, without laying any taxation upon them. This I suppose was a sea- son of sickness or dearth. 4. Presentment to be made of negligent recusants. From thence he repaired into Essex ; but he found as he went along the disorders were not so great as was feared, though more (as he confessed in a letter to a great friend at Court) than were to be wished, until he came to Maiden ; where, as he expressed in the same letter, he had like to have tasted of the sour fruits of the new reformers, and especially of such as were mercenary ; that is, such as were retained to preach in divers places, besides the ordinary trange Ministers. A certain fellow, to be hired by some young Goes into Essex. ni' ^ in- tended a- heads in the town, tradesmen there, was to have come into gainst the t j le c l lurc ]j besmeared like a fool, and to have taken the liishop at Maiden. Bishop's cap off from his head, and having twirled it about his finger, to have cast and tossed it to and fro among them in the midst of the people. But by some means this came to knowledge, and was seasonably prevented : which if it had not, there was no doubt but a dangerous tumult would have risen, and, as the Bishop feared, not without blood. The Bishop examined the matter, and having found out the chief devisers of it, committed them. The bailiffs and the rest were much dismayed at it. The Bishop did ad- vise hereupon, that her Majesty, or some of the Lords of the Council, would shew some countenance of misliking of so dangerous a device as the fruits of those men's preach- ings, who disobeyed the book and other orders ; whereby, as by the Bishop's present proceedings they were daunted, and began to yield, so the Bishop doubted not then to find BISHOP AYLMER. them and all others in that corner verv tractable. This hap- CHAP, pened in July. U1 The Bishop retreated from his adventures at Maiden to Goes to Wickham, where he had a manor, to which was a fair large w lcJJiam - house annexed, formerly the seat of the Bishops of Lon- don, for the government of those parts of the country. But now it had been granted away from the manor by some means or other ; perhaps some long lease made by some of this Bishop's predecessors to the Queen, as it seems : so that the Bishops, when they came into these parts, had no house for them and their companies to reside in : whereby the people of that country was deprived of the benefit of their Bishop's influence and care in dwelling sometimes among them. The house was large and spacious ; the farmer who now occupied it had but a small family ; so that a great part of the house might well be spared. This therefore the Bishop had a desire of, and made interest with the Queen for her gracious letters to have some portion of the house for a month or two in the year; not only because the house went to ruin so greatly, as if he had not some part thereof, thereby to repair it, it would be ever hereafter unfit for any Bishop to tarry in ; but chiefly, because he doubted not but within short space to bring all the whole country into so good an order, as any other part of his diocese whatsoever, both in respect of disordered persons, as such as were of lewd conversation. As Ins being at his house at Hadham some small time in the year had made by this time all the country of Hertfordshire (before out of order) now to be most quiet and orderly. The Bishop's pious and painful son, Dr. Theophilus Avl-Dr.Ayimer, mer, now Archdeacon of London, the 6th of January en- A suing, called for the Clergy, (as he frequently used to do,) intending this meeting chiefly for such Ministers as were not preachers, but of the inferior sort : for the bringing forward of which were these particulars enjoined. 1. Every person to have a Bible in English and Latin. 2. Every person to have Bullingers Decads. 3. Each to have his paper book, and therein to write the quantity of one sermon every week. g 2" 84 THE LIFE OF p - 4. This book to be shewn quarterly unto a certain grave ! — man appointed to examine how they had profited, and he to deliver them to Mr. Archdeacon. 5. The examinants to use these beginners with favour. 6. Every non-preaching Minister to be taxed at four purchased sermons every year ; that is, to procure at his own cost a preacher to preach a sermon in his church once in a quarter. 7. A licensed preacher to preach sixteen times in a year. Within two months after, the diligent Archdeacon summoned the Clergy again, viz. March the 8th ; that is, the preachers and learn- eder sort ; enjoining them, L To observe carefully the Book of Common Prayer. 2. To catechize youth Sundays and holydays. And this was now allowed to Curates to do ; and that in certain questions and answers set forth by the Bishop: as namely, Who made you? God. Who re- deemed you ? Jesus Christ, Sec. and so on, as little children are now commonly and commendably taught by their pa- rents to this day. 3. Every man to shew his letters of or- ders and licence to preach immediately. And lastly, se- veral who had taken the degrees of Masters of Art, or Ba- chelors of Art, were enjoined to procure the Bishop's li- cence to preach. This and the former call was for this end; to increase the number of preachers, according to a mandate from the Archbishop to all the Bishops. CHAP. VIII. Cawdrifs case, who was deprived and deposed from the ministry. Cawdry of In the year 1587, 1 find the Bishop again sitting in the ec- citcd be- clesiastical Commission ; where he executed a judicial act, fore the t hat created him, and others with him, work for four or five sion. years after : and because I shall set it down more distinctly, let me obtain excuse for the length of it. There was one Robert Cawdry, that having been a schoolmaster for seven or eight years, afterwards got the favour of the Lord Burgh- BISHOP A YLMER. B5 ley to be presented to the living of South Loughnam, or C H A P. Luffenham, in Rutlandshire : where after he had spent six- ) I1L teen years, he was convented before the Commission, and in fine deprived by our Bishop : for there was preferred se- cretly an information against him for speaking divers words in the pulpit, tending to the depraving of the Book of Com- mon Prayer. The Commission gave him his oath, according to the practice of those spiritual courts, to answer interroga- tories that should be propounded to him, for the clearing of himself if he could do it. Then he attended ten weeks upon the Commissioners, but proved altogether incompliant; and so being judged a dangerous person, if he should con- tinue preaching, bv infecting the people with principles dif- ferent from the religion established, at length the Bishop The Bishop himself gave the definitive sentence May the 30th, there him?™ sitting then with him, Dr. Valentine Dale, Sir Owen Hop- ton, Kt., 'William Fleetwood, Sergeant at Law, William Aubrey and Edward Stanhope, Doctors of Law, his col- leagues. In the aforesaid sentence there was added a se- cond cause of his deprivation ; namely, for not conforming himself in the celebration of the divine service and admin- istration of the Sacraments, but refusing so to do ; though indeed for the most part he did conform himself to the book, only leaving out the cross in baptism, and the ring in mar- riage. The Bishop also, besides his deprivation, suspended him from exercising any ministry in LufFenhani or else- where. But Cawdry thought himself hardly and unjustly dealt Cawdry re- withal, and therefore acquiesced not in his sentence, nor mit to the would submit himself. However the Commissioners had in sentence. March following sent their letters to the Bishop of Peter- borough, to send his ordinary process to Luffenham church, and to give intimation to the Lord Burghlev to present an- other ; yet he still kept possession and held the Erring, styl- ing himself in his letters, " Minister and Pastor of South " Luffenham." Upon which disobedience he was also de- graded by the Commissioners at Lambeth, as well as he had been deprived before in the consistory of Paul's. And g 3 86 THE LIFE OF CHAP, there were two things charged upon him by the Commission, VI11 ' why he should not be restored ; viz. want of learning, and not using the Common Prayer Book in that due exactness as he should. His law- On Cawdry's side the question was, whether he were ments. gU rightly deprived. If the Commissioners proceeded upon the statute primo Elizabeth, then it was argued by his lawyers, that he was not legally deprived ; for that statute limited deprivation to be a punishment for a second offence, and not James Mo- for the first, as Cawdry's case was. James Morice, Attor- yer. ne y °f tne Court of Wards, held this sentence to be nuD and void in law for these reasons: because his Lordship, the Bishop of London, was not Ordinary of the diocese where the benefice lay ; and that it was his sentence only, and not of the rest of the Commissioners. But to that it would be said, that the rest that were present and assisting concurred also in the sentence. Whereunto he replied, (which was his second argument,) that it was not the sentence of the Commissioners ; for by law the sentence should have been given in the name of all the Commissioners present, and not in the name of one by the others' consent, as it seems the sentence ran. Again, the Bishop in his decree said ex- pressly, the cause was controverted before him in judicio cx officio mero, which could not be before the Commissioners ; and if the cause were depending before his Lordship as pro- ceeding ex officio, how could the judgment, said he, be other than his own ? And then as for the sentence itself, or the matter of it, that he held to be contrary to law ; because there were by law several censures and punishments to be inflicted in that case before deprivation, which was the last ; as namely, ad- monition, excommunication, sequestration. But this sen- tence at the first inflicted the last and extremest punish- ment ; which was not warrantable by the statute, nor any other of the Queen's ecclesiastical laws. This was the substance of a paper which the said Morice, a good friend to Cawdry, and that stuck close to him, writ in Cawdry's behalf upon the Lord Treasurer Burghley's de- BISHOP AYLMEIl. 87 sire; who, upon that Minister's suit to him, had a com pas- CHAP, siou for the man, having a wife and eight children. V111 ' A year was now spent in this cause, and in May 1588 vindicates Cawdry laboured to vindicate himself in the two points laid learning! to his charge by the Bishop ; namely, concerning his learn- ing, and concerning his using the Book of Common Prayer. To satisfy the Lord Burghley (whom he styled his patron) in both these, as to the former, lie shewed him that (be- sides his teaching a grammar school formerly) he had weekly used some exercise of learning, in expounding to the jieople some places of holy Scripture now for the space of almost twenty years ; and he hoped in so many years 1 study in the school and in the Church, God hath blessed him with some small measure of knowledge. He appealed to the people, and the good success of his ministry ; which was, he said, a great comfort to his soul ; and he desired the said Lord to appoint him to read upon some place of Scripture in his own hearing, and he was in some good hope his Lordship should not find him so utterly unfit to do any good in the service of the Church. He confessed in very truth, that in respect of his great calling he was much unfit, for want of ability in learning, to supply that sacred function ; and therefore wished with all his heart, that he were the most unlearned Minister in England, on this condition, that he might give over the same, and never to meddle with it again, even to-day before to-morrow. But it was some comfort to him, that God in mercy had so blessed his la- bours, that of so few people there was not a parish within ten miles and more of him, that knew better how to give unto God that which was due to God, and to Caesar that which was due to him. As for the other objection against him, he declared that Urges his he had always used the Common Prayer, and purposed to ^"fj^* use it still ; only he humbly craved that he might not be Prayer, more narrowly searched and looked into in the using of it, than many other Ministers were throughout England. Thus far on Cawdry "s side : but in truth to know how The reason Cawdry stood affected may be learned from the process it- ^ n '" e s sen " g 4 88 THE LIFE OF CHAP. self. He was convicted upon his own confession, publicly V111 ' in his sermon to have depraved the Book of Common Prayer, saying, that the same was a vile book, and fy upon it ; and that he had not observed the order of the said book in his ministration. For this he was divers and sundry times moved, commanded, and enjoined, publicly to retract and revoke his said words, and to acknowledge the book to be good and godly, and to promise to observe the order thereof in his future ministration ; but this he wilfully re- fused. The Court long expected his conformity; that is, from December 1586, to May the 30th 1687: which he not performing was then deprived. Which he The very next day he acquainted the Lord Burghley abide bv. with the sentence passed against him, and only craved that And why. {jy j^g f avour he might enjoy his benefice till Michaeltide next, as he called it ; (not liking, I suppose, to name it Mi- chaelmas ;) and intending quietly to relinquish it. But af- terwards, by the instigation of certain persons, he found fault with the sentence as unjust, and refused to submit to it, and prayed the favour and assistance of the said Lord. But that noble personage advised him to submit himself to the determination of the Archbishop and the Bishop of London. But this now he would not do ; and in a letter to that Lord, dated March 22, 1587, gave his reasons why His letter he would not abide by their award ; viz. " Because he was Burghley 11 " P ersua ded in his conscience, and lamentable experience " proved it, that these Lord Bishops after a sort, though not " directly, were the greatest enemies her Majesty had this " day in England : for that they had been, and yet were, " the greatest lets of a learned ministry. Through lack " whereof her Majesty's subjects, in six parishes for one " through her dominions, were yet as ignorant of the right " knowledge of their obedience towards God and her Ma- " jesty, as though they had lived under Popery. For had " it been possible, said he, that such a riotous rout of re- " bels could have been assembled together, and diat in one M corner of this realm, as were assembled together not many " years ago, (viz. anno 1569,) against her Majesty in the BISHOP AY L ME It. SO " north parts ; or that so many treasons and conspiracies CHAP. " could have come to that height as they were, if so be that " every parish had a faithful and learned Pastor, by preach- " ing and catechizing to beat into their heads continually " what obedience faithful subjects owe, first to God, and next " to their Prince ; which might have been brought to some " good effect or this, if they had not so countenanced non- " residents, and made so many idle shepherds ; and besides, " if they had not dealt so extremely against so many godly " Ministers, in displacing them for not observing some " Popish ceremonies. That this was most true, that gene- " rally throughout England, where most need was of the " best Ministers, there were the worst. That for his part he " did not know in any country where there was a preaching " Minister placed in that town where a recusant was : so " that Jesuits, seminaries, and Popish priests, might have " there free egress and regress without any check, which was " very dangerous to the State ; besides the great hindrance " of knowledge to obey God and the Prince, that otherwise " might there be planted. " A second cause was, for that the Bishops punished most " rigorously godly Ministers, (whom they could not justly " touch either with false doctrine or any misbehaviour in " life,) for not observing the Book of Common Prayer; and " yet they themselves, for the most part these twenty-nine " years had not observed it : as, first, in granting licences for " money to marry without the banns asking ; secondly, in " making insufficient Ministers; and thirdly, in not confirm- " ing of children, as the book appointed : and yet by that " order, they that were inferior Ministers were charged, that " they should not admit any to receive the Communion, " until such time as they were confirmed by the Bishop. " Whereby they fell into two extremes, either to offend " God, or the book : for if they were able to examine them- " selves, and give a reason of their faith, they, the Ministers, " might not deny them the Communion : but the book said " otherwise. Now seeing they omitted this, because they " knew it was a Popish ceremony, and not warrantable by 00 THE LIFE OF CHAP. "God's word; he demanded then, with what conscience " they could deal so hardly with them for leaving out some " ceremonies more superstitious and offensive than this. " Thirdly, for that they would allow any Papist, atheist, " and what wicked liver soever, that was convented before " them, to know their accuser, to have a copy, for their mo- " ney, of the interrogatories and other proceedings ; but " they, the Ministers, could neither know their accusers, nor " yet have the benefit of subjects. " Fourthly, for that they, the Bishops, condemned non- " residency to be horrible, odious to the people, and perni- " cious to the Church of God, and vet tolerated and dis- " pensed with the same ; as by their book of Canons extant " in print, and agreed upon in the Convocation House 1571, " in these words, as his memory served him: Absentia Pas- " toris d Dominico grege, et secura ilia negligentia, quam " videmus in multis, et destitutio Ministcrii, est res et in se "Jbeda, et odiosa in vulgu-s, et perniciosa Ecclesice Dei. " And lastly, for that they, the said Bishops, did molest, " nay, deprive them for preaching that doctrine which they " themselves had published in print, and was extant to be " seen." And then instanced in a book of the Bishop's of London, entitled, The Harborough of the Faithful : out of which the said Cawdry had transcribed as many passages as would fill half a sheet of paper, and sent them enclosed in his foresaid letter to the Lord Burghley. offers some And these at length were the causes set down by himself, mission!" 11 ne wou ld not submit himself to the Archbishop and Bishop, as he was advised to do ; yet afterwards, upon fur- ther suggestion of the forementioned Lord, he made at last a submission before the Archbishop, for the words he ut- tered concerning the Common Praver. But a further sub- mission he refused, viz. to submit himself to such orders as But win not should be agreed concerning liim ; namely, to recant and lidy"' retract publicly in the same place the words he was charged with, and to promise conformity to the laws established, and subscription to the Articles : which were such conditions, he said, as he dared not yield unto ; being persuaded that BISHOP A YLMER. !)1 such a submission would be both contrary to God's word, CHAP, and of great offence unto the Church. ' In May, on a Thursday, he appeared before the Com- Appears at missioners at Lambeth, who told him with some threats, Lambeth - that seeing he would not comply, he must attend them two days after, and then be deprived of his ministry, (as he had been of his benefice before,) and be made a layman. Yet they were so patient towards him, that this sentence Degraded was not executed upon him until a whole year after; namely, l)0sc j. May the 14th, 1590 : when, having been divers and sundry times advised and commanded to submit himself unto the. former sentences, and to the Queen's laws, in the observa- tion of the order of the book, but he had refused and de- nied to yield thereunto ; wherefore on the same day, for the said contempt and disobedience, (as the instrument of the sentence ran,) the nature and merits of this cause being first duly considered, he was by sentence in writing degraded and deposed from the ministry by these Commissioners pre- sent ; viz. Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, Mr. Se- cretary Wolley, Mr. Fortescu, the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, the Lord Chief Baron, Dr. Aubrey, the Dean of Westminster, the Attorney General, Dr. Co- sin, Archdeacon Redman, Dr. Stanhop, Dr. Lewin, Dr. Bancroft. At this meeting the Archbishop told him, that if he would not conform himself and be obedient to law, they would deprive him of his ministry. Cawdry answered, that he never denied to conform himself so far as he was bound by law, and as a Minister of God in conscience was bound to do. Upon this, the Commissioners 1 Proctor said he was deprived for speaking against the Book of Common Prayer. Cawdry answered, it was not true ; for that it ap- peared in his answer to the Articles upon his oath, that it was for speaking against an inconvenience that came by the book : but, added he, that if it were so in the worst manner that they could take it, yet it was no deprivation by law for the first offence ; and that he should have been indicted at the next assizes after, which he was not, and therefore clear by statute. THE LIFE OF CHAP. Upon this sentence the Bishop of Peterburgh, his dio- VI11 " cesan, sequestered him from his benefice, who hitherto had Bishop of enjoyed it, and supplied it with his Chaplain. To which feq^esters 11 Bishop the Lord Burghley, compassionating Cawdry's case bis living. an( j poverty, wrote, that he would, in consideration of his desolate state and great charge, allow him some yearly pen- sion out of the living. Whereupon the Bishop made this offer to Cawdry, that if he would disclaim his title to the living, and resign it unto his hand to the use of his Chap- lain, he would then consider of him. But Cawdry stopping upon terms, and requiring to know how and in what man- Cawdrysuesner the Bishop would do it, they brake off. Cawdry de- ^^^"'"sisted not, but took his course in the Star-chamber, and served subpoenas upon the Chaplain, and some others, upon pretence that they had committed a riot, in taking away by violence the corn that grew upon the glebe ; and again de- sired the said Lord's favour in that court. On the other hand, the Chaplain laboured to bring him before the Com- missioners ; and got an order to be set down there against him, either to answer more fully, or to be committed to pri- son within eight days. The Lord The next year, viz. May 1591, upon Cawdry 's suit again reconi- ey to tne Lord Burghley, he bade him consult with his coun- mends his se ] \yy w l ia t course he might be relieved. Accordingly he case to the ' y i i , • , • , , , ~ Bishop of did so: and they told mm the way was, either that the Corn- London, missioners should revoke their sentence of deprivation, and so to restore him to his ministry ; or, by his Lordship's means, to have a mandate procured for that end from the Queen ; or else to be restored to the possession of his living, and so to follow his suit in forma pauperis, depending in the King's Bench, for the trial of his cause. But the moderate course the said Lord thought fittest to take was, to desire the Commissioners to consider the exceptions taken against their proceedings, and to review and reexamine this man's case ; and so he prayed the Bishop of London to do, spe- cially considering several particulars urged by Cawdry on his own behalf : but in truth misrepresented to that Lord against the Commissioners. Whereupon the Bishop of Lon- BISHOP AYLMER. 93 don wrote this letter unto the said Peer, relating the truth CHAP. e a VIII. oi the cause : " I received your Lordship's letter of the first of June, The Bj-^ " upon the fourth of the same, touching Robert Cawdry, to the said " late Parson of South Luffenham in the county of Rut- Lord - " land, and his deprivation from the said benefice by sen- " tence definitive of her Majesty's Commissioners for causes " ecclesiastical, together with a case drawn by himself, as it " seemeth, and subsigned by his learned counsel ; wherein " how far he abuseth your Lordship may appear by this " enclosed brief, touching our proceedings against him. He " was detected unto us, not only for depraving the Book of " Common Prayer in such vile terms as in the said brief is " set down, but also for refusing to observe the orders by " the same book appointed. Which his speeches, he being " oftentimes by us judicially admonished to revoke, and to " observe the said orders, and he still refusing the same, " we in the end proceeded, as by law, and a proviso in the " end of the statute, mentioned by his learned counsel, we " hold it warrantable, to his deprivation. " Where your Lordship further writeth to pray the Com- " missioners to review and examine the said sentence, and " to consider of the exceptions by him proposed to the same, " your Lordship shall find in the enclosed brief a further "judicial proceeding against him, whereat were present " some of the judges of the land, and of her Majesty's " learned Council ; wherein, for that he persevered in his " disobedience, whereof he was convicted upon his own con- " fession, for not submitting himself to the former sentence " of deprivation, and for continuing in refusal of observa- " tion of her Majesty's laws, touching the use of the orders " of the Book of Common Prayer, he was by sentence de- " finitive in writing degraded and deposed from his min- " istry. So as there is now no colour for him to desire re- " view of the former sentence touching his deprivation ; " when as the same is by a second sentence confirmed, and " he utterly unabled and removed from the ministry. These " proceedings, I hope, will justly move your good Lord- 94 THE LIFE OF CHAP. " ship not to give credit unto the complaints of such disor- V111 " " dered men as he is, whom it seemeth no due course of " law will anywise content. And so I commit your good " Lordship to God's holy protection. 1 ' 1 The proviso mentioned by the Bishop in the letter before, as warranting their doing, is in the statute of anno primo ; whereby is given unto the Archbishop, Bishop, and other ordinaries, power and authority to inquire in their visita- tions, synods, &c. to take accusations and informations of such offences, and to punish the same by admonition, ex- communication, sequestration, or deprivation, and other cen- sures and proceedings in like form, as heretofore had been used in like cases by the Queen's ecclesiastical laws. Cawdry's But James Morice, Cawdry's friend and counsellor, ad- counseiior's v i sec l m sorae heat, that his Lordship would make the Bi- angry ad- 1 vice. shop feel and understand his lawless proceedings, whereby (as he said) haply some remorse of conscience might move him to be more favourable ; and added, that though it might be offensive to find fault with judicial proceedings, he considered also the present time and persons, and had little hope to do any good by that course of reexamining ; yet, seeking to help the wronged, and to maintain law and justice, and to make ecclesiastical judges more careful here- after, he thought it unseemly in men of his profession to be afraid of every frown ; especially having, as he assured him- self, the law to take his part. Dr. Au- In the same year, viz. July 1591, the Lord Burghley leiiuHhe sent certam papers concerning Cawdry's case, drawn up by case. the aforesaid Morice, to prove the course taken against him unlawful, to Dr. Aubrey, a learned civilian, and indeed one of the Commissioners ; that he would send back his impar- tial judgment thereupon, laying aside the consideration of himself as a Commissioner. And Aubrey accordinglv wrote his opinion learnedly and modestly, as followeth ; for I choose rather to transcribe his letter, than contract the sub- stance of it. ' My duty to your good Lordship humbly remembered. BISHOP AYLMER. 95 " I make bold to return to your Lordship such writings as CHAP. " it pleased your Lordship to deliver unto me, touching the V11K " removing of Cawdry from the parsonage of Luffenham " in the county of Rutland, and his deposing from the min- " istry ; which for the duty I owe to your good Lordship f I have perused, and according to my poor skill considered ; " and dispossessing myself, as I could, of all affection that I " should bear to the maintenance of a sentence wherein, " among other, myself is a party, I make bold to impart to " your good Lordship my opinion simply, as I think and " can conceive of the cause. First, if either the Commis- " sioners were bound by the Commission to proceed accord- 41 ing to the statute of anno primo, or had in any part of '• their proceedings expressed that they meant to proceed " only according to the order and form appointed in that " statute ; or if the statute were so straining, as the Com- " missioners were tied to proceed according to the form of " that statute, and no otherwise, (as I take it not to be,) it " is true that is delivered to your Lordship by Cawdry 's " counsel, that the sentence is not justifiable by the precise " letter of the statute. But the law ecclesiastical being in " such force for manner of proceeding as it was before the " making of that statute, and the Commission warranting " the Commissioners to proceed according to the law eccle- " siastical, or according to their sound discretions, all the " principal force of the reasons alleged to ground a nullity " in the sentence is taken away. And where the sentence is " impugned, because the Bishop of London did read the " sentence cum consensu collegarum suorum, whatsoever " the temporal law is in that point, it is most agreeable to " the law civil and canon, that where there is a multitude " of judges, one shall be the instrument in the pronouncing " with the consent of the rest ; and it is a matter absurd, " and not possible, that all shall concur in the act of read- " ing. And that hath been in this realm the usual form, " and no other, of all sentences in proceedings and causes " ecclesiastical. " As for the degradation and deposing of Mr. Cawdry 96 THE LIFE OF CHAP. « from the ministry, the temporal law of the realm taketh \ " no knowledge thereof ; and yet the Chief Justice of the " Common Pleas, the Lord Chief Baron, and the Queen's " Attorney, were there, and gave their consents. And it is " of that nature, that until he be restored, he is not capable " of any other benefice ecclesiastical ; and was [so censured,] " not only for lack of his conformity to the sentence, but " for that he refused to conform himself to the observ ation " of her Majesty's laws, and of the order of the book, in " sundry particular points : however, in general words he " pretendeth that he will be obedient. Thus praying your " good Lordship to take this my short plain answer in good " part, I humbly take my leave of your good Lordship. " Your good Lordship's humbly " at commandment, « WILLIAM AUBREY." " From London, « this 18th July, 1591." The statute That sentence of anno prbno of the Queen, which Caw- Cawdry's dry's counsel so much urged to render the sentence of de- counsel, privation null, was this, that it appointed the punishment for depraving the Book of Common Prayers, or refusing to say or use the said Common Prayers, or to minister the Sa- craments, after lawful conviction according to the laws of this realm, by verdict of twelve men, by confession, or no- torious evidence of the fact ; for the first offence, to be only the loss of the profits of his benefice for one year, and six months' imprisonment ; and after the first conviction, if a second offence be committed, and a lawful conviction had, then a year's imprisonment with deprivation ipso facto. But this decree or definitive sentence inflicted deprivation for the first offence, leaving no time for the second convic- tion, nor punishment for a second offence. Offered to j^ n ^ fa us at ] ast t j 1 i s \ ono . process seemed to be ended, be restored ° . r . . , ~ , to his min- (at least I know no more of it,) which was in hand four subTcrip-" y ears an d seven months, and cost Cawdry one or two and tion. twenty journeys to London. The last particular I meet BISHOP AYLMER. 97 with in this tedious suit was, that the aforesaid nobleman CHAP, requested that this man might be restored to his ministry ; V111 ' which Dr. Lewin and Dr. Aubrey acquainted the Arch- bishop with : who answered, he was willing to do it, if he would subscribe to certain Articles, as other Ministers did: which had been offered to him several times before, both by the Archbishop and the Bishop of London. But that Caw- dry would not be brought to do : neither could the advice of his said noble intercessor prevail with him. CHAP. IX. His contest with one Maddocks. Smith, the Preacher at St. ClemenCs, suspended. A visitation. Dyke, of St. Albans, forbid preaching. Cartzoright the Puritan. Sir Denys Roghan. The see of Oxford void. 1 HESE transactions with Cawdry have carried me for- ward three or four years, that I might lay my whole narra- tive thereof together. I must therefore go back again, having some other things to relate, wherein our Bishop was concerned. In April 1588, he happened to have a ruffle with a mad The occa- blade named Maddocks, who had married a gentleman's ^""telt be- daughter of Fulham. This man was of a turbulent hot head, tween the and made great stirs in that town : and the same Maddocks, Maddocks. 11 I suppose, of whom Sir J ohn Harrington relates, how that Brief view this Bishop once told him, that his name expressed his na- '{J* s ' tat< ture, and that he was one of the madest beasts that ever he Chnrch. talked with. He happened to have a contest with the Bishop about some private matters ; as concerning the right of a pew in Fulham church ; and with the townsmen about a passage to a ground of the Bishop's. Martin Marprelate brings in another cause yet of these dissensions, namely, from the Bishop's taking part with his man, who being executor to the will of somebody dwelling in Fulham, de- tained the payment of a legacy given therein to a poor it 98 THE LIFE OF CHAP, shepherd : whereat Maddocks advised the shepherd to bring ' his case into the Court of Requests, where he had some of- fice, thinking probably thereby to draw some blemish upon the Bishop. And when the matter was indeed moved in that Court, the Bishop wrote to the Masters of the Requests, that they would discharge his man, and he would see agree- ment made ; which nevertheless that Court yielded not to : and the Bishop knowing Maddocks, the man that upheld the shepherd, sent for him; who coming, angry words happened. These matters argued pro and con created more and more difference ; insomuch that divers frays hap- pened between Maddocks and the Bishop's servants, who would not hear their master abused. One of these hap- Maddocks pened when he and his wife were walking together. Mad- to"the a ' nS docks makes the first complaint, and puts up a petition to Council. the Privy Council, (enclosed in a letter to the Lord Trea- surer,) therein relating particularly the injuries pretended to be done him by the Bishop and his followers, desiring his case might be heard before his Lordship and the Queen's honourable Council; which, he said, no mean justice would do, because the Bishop was, by her Majesty's advancement, in such dignity: and that in the mean time he might have a warrant from his Lordship to apprehend the Bishop's cut- ters, as he called them, until the matter had a hearing. He added, that his wife was with child as he thought, and rested since the last assault (wherein he was wounded) in very hard case : that that assault was in the view of the Bishop : that when he complained thereof to him, he gave him re- proachful words : that for his part, he had given no cause to his knowledge. He represented his case as desperate, either to lose his own life, or, by the loss of the life of some of the Bishop's base followers, to hazard his poor estate ; which was the thing, he said, the Bishop desired. The Bishop Upon this the good Lord Treasurer sent to the Bishop, cLe. eS 6 P ravm g hun to order his men to do no injury to Maddocks. To whom the Bishop presently sent answer, that he had given warning to his servants not to meddle with Mad- docks : nor needed he to fear that his men should offer him BISHOP AYLMER. 99 any injury, nor hitherto had done, but. when he and two CHAP, of his men had picked out their match to assault one of IX ' his men, three against one. And yet, said the Bishop, as he understood, his single man housed them all. But that he, minded to see the peace kept, sent for both him, his men, and his own servant: but Maddocks refused to come to him. The Bishop upon this occasion thought fit moreover to give this Lord a little taste of the good dealing of the man : as 1. He made a fray upon his father's man, (as well as upon his,) and wounded him in the head with some peril, and he himself had his head broken for his labour : which blood- shedding was to be examined at the next leet. 2. He charged some belonging to his father with felony; which proved but a rage of humour, and nothing else. 3. He wrangled with the whole town [of Fidham] about a pas- sage to a ground of his, [the Bishop's,] wherein he thought in his conscience he did them wrong. 4. He found means in the Court of Requests to cast an honest husbandman of the said town into the Fleet, greatly to his damage and hurt. 5. Upon Easter-day last he came in warlike man- ner with rapier and target to Fulham church, when the Bishop and all his men were at the Court ; and there thrust in his mother and his sister into the Bishop's wife's seat, and troubled his daughters, being come to receive the Com- munion. The Bishop added, that he bragged that he dis- dained to fight with any of his men ; but if he [the Bishop himself] would hold up his finger, he would be with him at host. That his father-in-law was an honest gentleman, but could do nothing with him, and his rash head since he came there troubled all the town. And lastly, as to the late fray, he told his Lordship that he might well consider that if Maddocks abused him behind his back, his men would hardly bear it at his hands. And indeed the Bishop himself, who was a man of metal, and could use his hands well, would perhaps not well have liked it, if they should. In fine, Maddocks had so rudely behaved himself to- Maddocks wards the Bishop, that at last it came before the Arch- sub "" ts - bishop of Canterbury, and some other Bishops assisting; h 2 100 THE LIFE OF CHAP, who found the matter so ill on Maddocks's part, that he ' was content before them to ask him forgiveness, and to pro- mise that he would ever after have a reverent regard of his duty toward the said Bishop, as his ordinary. Smith, Lec- Mr. Henry Smith, an eloquent and a witty man, had the Clement?' ^ ast y ear ' VIZ - 1587, become Reader or Lecturer at St. Cle- ment Danes without Temple-Bar, at the desire of many of the parishioners, and by the favour of the Lord Treasurer, who dwelt in the said parish, and yielded contribution to him. This is the Smith whose sermons have been a com- mon family book even to this day, and often reprinted. He was the son of a gentleman of Leicestershire, and bred for a little while in Oxford : but desiring to spend more time there, his father, whatever the reason was, would not yield unto his suit. Soon after his coming from Oxford, he lived and followed his studies with Richard Greenham, a pious Minister in the country, but not thoroughly affected to the orders of the Church established ; and Ins principles he seemed to have infused into Smith. The Lord Treasurer took notice of the man, especially when he put in for the preacher's place in the parish of St. Clement's. Therefore he obtained a testimonial and character from Greenham to the said Lord : to whom, after some preface in his letter, as considering his Honour's place, and rare wisdom in discerning of gifts, and his own unmeetness to commend, and that there were many better means to inform himself, which he might Greeniiam's have ; at length lie thus wrote of him, " That he would him to the " not speak of his human literature, whereof he supposed Treasurer. « Smith himself had given him [the Lord Treasurer] some " small token, (he meant, I suppose, by a sermon preached " before him,) but he had perceived him to have been well " exercised in the holy Scriptures, religious and devout in " mind, moderate and sober in opinions and affection, dis- " creet and temperate in his behaviour, industrious in his " studies and affairs, and, as he hoped, of an humble spirit " and upright heart, joined with the fervent zeal of the " glory of God and health of souls. Which mixture of " God's gifts put him in hopes, that God hereafter might BISHOP AYLMER. lul " be much glorified in him ; specially if he might have tar- CHAP. " ried in the University until his gifts were grown unto Ix " " some more maturity. In which particular, he added, he " had earnestly dealt with him unto the same end, [and so " had the Lord Treasurer,] but he still answered that he " could not obtain that favour of his father." In short he was permitted to read (that is, to preach aThe Bisiiop lecture) at St. Clement's, where one Harewood was now^ ends Parson. But the next year, being the year 1588, our Bi- shop, being informed that he had spoken in his sermon some words derogatory to the Common Prayer, neither had subscribed the Articles, wherein was contained the approba- tion of the said book, suspended him from preaching a while. His own case he drew up briefly for the informa- tion, it seems, of the Lord Treasurer; which was as fol- lows : Reasons objected and alleged by the Bishop of London, against Henry Smith, Preacher of St. ClemenCs without Temple-Bar, as causes for which he hath proceeded to the suspension of the said Henry from the exercise of his ministry. I. That I was chosen by a popular election, as his Lord- The reasons ship termeth it, that is, by the Minister and congregation, why " without his Lordship's licence. II. That I have preached against the Book of Common Prayer. III. That I have not yielded my subscription to certain Articles which his Lordship required at my hands. Mine answer to the same. " First, touching my calling thither, I was recommended His answer " to the parish by certain godly preachers, which had heard t0 them ' " me preach in other places in this city; and thereupon ac- " cepted of by the parish, and entertained with a stipend " raised by voluntary contribution : in which sort they had " heretofore entertained others without any such question " or exception. Secondarily, his Lordship calling me to h 3 102 THE LIFE OF CH\p. " preach at Paul's Cross never moved any such question to IX " " me. Nevertheless, if any error have been committed " herein either by me or the parish, through ignorance, our " joint desire is to have his Lordship's good allowance and " approbation for the exercise of my function in his Lord- " ship's diocese. " Touching the second, however his Lordship hath been " informed against me, I never used speech in any of my " sermons against the said Book of Common Prayer ; " whereof the parish doth bear me witness in this supplica- " tion to your Lordship. " Concerning the third, I refuse not to subscribe to any " Articles, which the law of the realm doth require of men " of my calling : acknowledging with all humbleness and " loyalty her Majesty's sovereignty in all causes, and over " all persons within her Highness's dominions ; and yield- " ing my full consent to all the Articles of faith and doc- " trine taught and ratified in this Church, according to " a statute in that behalf provided the thirteenth year of " her Majesty's reign. And therefore beseech his Lordship " not to urge upon me any other subscription than the law " of God and the laws positive of this realm do require." Certain of If he subscribed not afterwards, yet he seemed to have 'lie to the £* ven some satisfaction to the Bishop for his continuance in LoidBuxgh-Ms place till the year 1589 ; when, upon the dangerous sick- Smith to be ness °f Harewood the incumbent, divers of the parish peti- their Minis- turned the Lord Treasurer, that in case he died, Mr. Smith their preacher might succeed him. And being departed this life, they renewed their petition, signed with the hands of divers of St. Clement's and Lion's Inns, and the two churchwardens, the one a grocer, the other a locksmith, and a good number besides of ordinary tradesmen, as smiths, tailors, saddlers, hosiers, haberdashers, glaziers, cutlers, and such like, most of them setting their marks. The petition was somewhat rude, as were the men from whom it came: for it expressed, " That if there were any towards his " Lordship, whom his Honour affected, and was willing to " prefer thereunto, they most humbly and instantly impor- BISHOP AYLMER. 103 " tuned his Lordship [notwithstanding to lay them aside, CHAP. " and] to prefer Mr. Smith in this, and them some odier IX ' " way, as his Lordship had many- And in behalf of them- " selves they set forth, that [if this might be obtained] then " Mr. Smith's living should be ascertained, [which was but " precarious before,] and they eased of his stipend, [and so " a charge taken from them,] and their desires satisfied " in enjoying him for their Parson. In fine, giving this " character of him, that his preaching, living, and sound " doctrine, had done more good among them, than any " other that had gone before, or, which they doubted, could " follow after." But notwithstanding, I scarce think these men, nor their reasons, were of strength to prevail with the Treasurer. The care of the press lay also upon the Bishop ; and An abusive complaint was made to him in the year 1589, in April, by g ainst the the Lord Treasurer, concerning a piece that was now come Kin s of abroad. The matter was this. After the Spaniards were so shamefully defeated at sea the last year, and their Invin- cible Armada came to nothing, as thanks and praise was given to God by the devout sort, so lighter minds set them- selves to exercise their wits in the abuse of that proud na- tion, not sparing King Philip himself. One pamphlet of this sort in foolish rhyme was dispersed in London about this time ; which gave offence to the said Lord, and, as it seems, to the Queen herself: for the persons of Princes are sacred, and that great statesman ever spake reverently of them ; nor was it thought advisable to provoke that Prince. Whereupon he sent to the Bishop to know who presumed The Bishop to print it. The Bishop was of the same judgment, andt 0 n fi n dthe said, that in his opinion it had been better to have thanked P rinter - God than to have insulted upon men ; and especially upon Princes : and that he marvelled that they of Oxford (where it was first printed by Jos. Barnes) should suffer such toys to be set forth by their authority : and that he had found Toby Cook printed it at London without licence, and he would talk with him about it. The diligent Bishop was now very aged, near seventy visit*. h 4 104 THE LIFE OF CHAT, years of age ; and yet, according to his constant practice, . IX ' went this year 1589, his triennial visitation, which he held at London, August 30. Now among other injunctions, the Clergy there were required, 1. To give God public thanks for the French King's victory. 2. That they be ready with furniture according to the proportion assigned them ; that is, with arms for the Queen's defence, who was now in daily apprehension of the enraged Spaniard, since their shameful defeat the last summer. Suspends At St. Albans in Hertfordshire was placed somewhile Albana! S '' a g° one Dyke for preacher ; and that in some measure by the means of the Lord Treasurer, who dwelt not far off: for he had recommended him to the Bishop of London to allow him ; and because he was but Deacon, and somewhat suspected of nonconformity, the said Lord promised the Bishop, that if he troubled the congregation with inno- vation, he would join with the Bishop in punishing him. But now in November 1589, the Bishop stayed him from preaching for troubling his auditory with new opinions and notions, thwarting the established religion d . But Dyke had gained a great vogue among that ordinary sort of people ; who therefore made their application to the said noble per- son, that he would prevail with the Bishop that he might be restored to his ministry. And in compliance with their suit the kind Lord writ to the Bishop about Dyke, and the interest made for him ; and desired to know upon what cause he had forbidden him the pulpit. The Bishop Gives his readily gave these reasons for it : viz. That he was only reasons for j) eacon an d S o had continued manv years, refusing and dis- so doing. r * J ° allowing of the ministry of the Church of England, and the priesthood, as the book called it, which Dyke, I suppose, reckoned Popish. That the people, if they listed, might be sufficiently instructed by one Mr. Williams, a grave preacher and better learned, without new-fangled innovations, where- with the other did exceedingly keep them occupied : and added, he thought it necessary to have him there. That Dyke was and had been charged with ill-favoured matters "1 See Additions, Numb. IV. BISHOP AYLMER. 105 of incontinencv, schisms, and disorders, and withstanding of C II A P. orders given from the Lords of the Privy Council ; whereof 1X " he had not yet purged himself, and therefore not to be retained in the Church. He added, that the multitudes of supplicants for him were of the meanest and basest sort, "dubbed," as he expressed it, "with the title of yeomanry." But instead of all other reasons, he urged that he could not in conscience tolerate him, who was not full Minister, nor would be, lest by that means he should seem to join with him in misliking and disallowing of our sacred ministry. And thus hoping that his Lordship, in consideration of the premises and many other reasons which he omitted, would be content to bear with him, though he bore not with Dyke, he took his leave of his Lordship, praying God to bless him with health and a just care of the peace of the Church, as hitherto he had done. Thomas Cartwright, the head Puritan, lay now in the Cartwright Fleet, having been in the year 1590 summoned up f rom app'arf be- Warwick into the Star-chamber, together with Edmund fore the Snape, and divers other Puritan Ministers, for setting up a Bl!,hoi>- new discipline and a new form of worship ; and subscribing their hands to stand to it e : which therefore was interpreted an opposition and disobedience to the established laws. In May 1591, Cartwright lying now in the Fleet, was sent for by the Bishop to appear before him and Dr. Bancroft, and some others of the ecclesiastical Commission : and being brought into a chamber of the Bishop's house, he in a long speech directed himself unto him. He first charged him in Who expos- abusing the Privy Council by informing them of his dis- j ul!ltcs with eases, wherewith indeed he was not troubled: for Cart- wright had lately sued to them for his liberty from the Fleet upon pretence of his gout and sciatica: which it seems was more in pretence than truth. Secondly, that as he had abused the Council, so he with others, in a supplication, had abused her Majesty, in suggesting that the oath that was tendered to them was not according to law r , and that it was given generally without limitation : meaning the oath c See Appendix, Numb. V. 106 THE LIFE OF CHAP, which the ecclesiastical Commissioners offered to those that ' came before them. Thirdly, that he had confessed twice or thrice before that time, that a man might be saved in ob- serving the orders of the Church established by the laws of the land, and in consequence thereupon he charged him with the vanity and fruitlessness of seeking a further re- formation : adding moreover, that in the greatest matters he and others contended for, they were of the same opinion that the Papists were of ; as partly, he said, appeared by the answers of some of his party that were a few days ago at Lambeth before the Archbishop and the Commissioners there: whereas what agreement was between the Papists and the Bishops (which that party was so apt to lay to their charge) was at most but in some small ceremonies, and they but indifferent, till established by law. And these were some of his expostulations and dealings in commission with Cartwright. In many passages past of this our history we may have seen, that our Bishop had no great pleasure in his advance- ment to the bishopric. And he being of a quick and some- The Bi- what hasty spirit became the more uneasy. I shall mention vexed with* one passage more, (besides what is before mentioned,) that an insh p u t him into a discomposure, and seemed in truth to have been a thing put upon him by some of his back-friends to disturb him. It was often practised by the Priw Council to commit to the Bishops persons of quality or learning, to whose charge matters of treason or breach of laws had been laid ; that by their conversation and learned discourses and persuasions, the other might be gained and reclaimed, lying under an easy restraint in their houses. But about the month of April 1592, the Council sent to our Bishop a cer- tain extravagant Irish Priest named Sir Denys Roghan, or Rowghane, and a woman, pretended to be his wife; the Bishop called her his liousew'ife. These he was to maintain in meat, drink, and lodging, at his house; how long he knew not. The man had little to recommend him, be- ing of a loose turbulent conversation. The woman had a great belly, (which the Bishop called, her being bagged,) BISHOP AYLMER. 107 and was like perhaps to lay her burden within the Bishop's CHAP, house : and then he must also provide for her nurses and 1X " other necessaries. This Priest had lived in Spain, and seemed to have been privy to the conspiracies between Spain and the wild Irish against the Queen, and an actor in the disturbances and rebellions of that people. But now, upon some disgust taken against his party, came over, or was sent over, to discover their practices ; for which he ex- pected not only pardon but reward : for he carried himself insolently in the Bishop's family, and required great ob- servance of him and his, from the Bishop and his people. When he removed with his family to Fulham, Sir Denys would not stir from the Bishop's house at London ; and made such a revel rout there, that the Bishop and his ser- vants were perfectly afraid of him. He was therefore not without cause highly displeased Sues to be that these guests should be forced upon him, and sent letter nd ° f him " after letter to the Council ; and his son had waited upon them a fortnight and more, to be released of that most heavy and unbishop-UTce burden, as he termed it. And to the Lord Treasurer he thus bemoaned himself : " That " besides his charges, there was the carefulness of keeping " them : and assuring his Lordship that it was a great of- " fence to his conscience to keep such an idle couple in his " house ; which stirred no more in reading, in working, " in praying, than very dead idols ; but when his Irish " mouth lavished against his Lordship, [the Lord Trea- " rurer,] the rest of the Council, and such as strained them- " selves to keep them to their charge, [the Bishop meant " himself,] very unseemly and ungratefully. That it had " been the wont to commit to the Bishops of London their " keeping learned men, and not asses with their great- " bellied wives; Indignum Ejri.scopo, et sene, et libero cive " officium, i. e. ' An office unworthy a Bishop, an aged " man, and a free citizen.' He prayed his Lordship that " he might have help; for it hindered his study, his prayer, " and his preaching : and whatsoever they had offended " among them, that it was no reason that he should bear ICS THE LIFE OF CHAP. " the punishment." Thus he expostuled and argued in liis 1X - letter dated May 13. Delivered of But notwithstanding all this endeavour, the Bishop could him at last. not ge( . rid of y g guest . f or j fj nc j fa was with him in June. And when he was to be removed to Fulham, where the Bishop now was, he would not by any means go thither : of which he wrote to the Lord Treasurer in a second letter. Here Sir Denys's business now was, in preparing pistols, and swords in walking staves, and other weapons, whereby the Bishop shewed the said Lord that his men and himself were driven to some suspicion that he minded some mis- chief to somebody: that therefore none of his men dared tarry about him, nor he [the Bishop himself] go into his house, but by some back way. He acknowledged, " it was " an honourable meaning to seek to help this man, but " what it would be in the eye of the world, and in the " chronicle to our posterity, to reward an accuser, that he " left to his Lordship's wisdom to judge.'" But at length he was relieved : for I find Rowghan at Kingston in the month of November, and at liberty. Who this Perhaps we shall be desirous to know who this Irishman irishman w ^ what his business here in England. Take this was. ' o account of both. He had been a Romish Priest, but now professed himself a most faithful subject of the Queen, and acknowledged her supremacy, made a shew of the Protestant religion, and was married. And being formerly among the Queen's enemies in Ireland, was privy to all their traitorous purposes and doings; and upon some disgust taken, had left them, and come into England, to accuse them and dis- cover their practices, and withal hoped by this means to get himself advanced. And coming over in the year 1591, he exhibited a note to the Council of the special and His inform- chief mischiefs in Ireland. And his informations he re- the°Councii P eate( l several times to the Council, who it seems were not very fond of him. The sum of which was, that there was one Dr. Craghe in Ireland, who came thither in company with Dr. Saunders from beyond sea, with a number of Spaniards, to the arch-traitor the Earl of Desmond : that BISHOP AYLMER. 109 this Craghe remained there to this day, seducing the people CHAP, from the true service of God, and their loyalty to the 1X " Queen ; giving the world to understand, that he was there without either protection or pardon : that he daily conse- crated priests, and used other papistical orders : that by his means the land was filled with iniquity, theft, murder, and rebellion. Moreover, he informed, that there were very many of the inhabitants of that realm, as well in cities and towns, as in the countries, that transported themselves into Spain, and others sent their sons or their next kin thither, to assure the Spaniard the land to be theirs. Then he ad- His advice, vised that it would be necessary to send somebody furnished with sufficient authority to seize upon those seminary priests and their tutors, and to empower some trusty men to exa- mine such as sent their sons or kindred to Spain ; and espe- cially the Lord of Cahir, who had sent his nephew with let- ters to the King of Spain, and to inquire into the numbers and names of those that were gone to seek the invasion of the land. This man offered himself ready to answer any interrogatories concerning the premises that the Council should put to him, and to discourse the same more largely, and to set down the best means, as was possible, to bring the same to pass. He promised to discover many other abuses done there, yet unknown to the Queen and her Council ; so that he were encouraged, as he had been discouraged, as he told the Queen. I take also out of a letter Rowghane wrote to her, that he avouched that several of her chief officers themselves in Ireland were traitors; as Sir John Perrot, the Lord Deputy, Sir Nic. White, Master of the Rolls, and many more. He subscribed himself, Her Majesty's most true, humble, and faithful subject, D. Rowhcme, both Priest and Solicitor to her Highness. But how, if, after all this, Rowghan were a Papist still, But proves and all he drove at was only to get himself advanced and re- Irishman, venged ? for what a right Irishman this fellow was, was evi- dent by the examination that was taken of his man, one Ar- thur Connock, upon oath before Sir William Rowe, Lord Mayor in November anno 159-9- ■ whence it appeared, that 110 THE LIFE OF CHAP, he, for his service in accusing Sir John Perrot, expected to 1X " have been made a Bishop, or to have been raised to some high place : which if he had, he said, he would have pulled down the best of them all ; meaning, of the Queen's Privy Council. And because he was not better answered, he told Connock he meant to go to Rome ; and would have had this servant of his to go along with him, saying, that he should have better maintenance for saying of masses, than he had of her Majesty for his said service; and that he stayed only to get a little money together, and then he would set forward : and added, that when he was once at Rome, he would lay such plots as should disquiet the best of them all. And when his said man refused to go over to Rome with him, he threatened he would lay so heavy a burden upon him as he should not be able to bear, and would charge him with such plots as should cost him his life. And what truth there was in his pretence of being a Protestant may appear in this, that he wore next his skin a string whereon hung a little round bag, and divers pieces of twopences and threepences were bowed over the said string, to be offered to saints, or those that kept saints. And this at length was the man that our Bishop was so weary of ; and well he might be. Commends His care of the Church, and his respect to his friends, certain for sucn as were tru jy WO rthv, put him on sometimes to recom- the see of . , J Oxford. mend persons to bishoprics that fell void : and in May this year, viz. 1592, the see of Oxon lost its Pastor, Dr. Under- hil. For the supply of this place he had two persons in his eye ; the one was the Bishop of Gloucester, John Bulling- ham, who at that time made suit, that that bishopric might be joined in commendam to his own poor one : the other was Dr. Cole, Head of a College in that University. Con- cerning these the Bishop of London wrote to the Lord Treasurer; that as for the Bishop of Gloucester, it was in his opinion very fit for him, for the nearness of the place, and to make some addition to his poor portion : or, if that were not thought convenient, and his Lordship shoidd not like of it, then he prayed him to remember Dr. Cole, who BISHOP AYLME It. Ill was his co-exile in Queen Mary's days, and his Lordship's CHAP, countryman, (that is, of Lincolnshire,) and his faithful well- 1X ' wilier. This man our Bishop had not long before recom- mended to something else, but succeeded not ; it being not his luck, as he said with some discontent, to further any of his good friends in any suit of his : yet however, he added, he could not be wanting to his friends, and to God's Church. But neither of these two were preferred to this bishopric, nor indeed any else during the reign of the Queen. Now our Bishop hath not above two years more to finish Desirous to his pilgrimage, when he had a great mind to resign his res ' gn " bishopric to Dr. Bancroft, a rising man, and acceptable to the Queen. And three times this year he offered him a re- signation upon certain conditions, perhaps in respect of the dilapidations, to allow him such a sum in satisfaction : for the Bishop seemed to foresee a considerable burden like to fall upon his estate on that account, and so thought it his best way to compound it in his life-time : but Bancroft re- fused. But questionless Bishop Aylmer's main inducement in labouring Bancroft's succession to the see of London was, that he knew him to be a person long used in the ecclesias- tical Commission, and strait for the observation of the rites and prescriptions of the Church established, against such as would have trampled upon them. Therefore it was but the day before our Bishop died, that he signified how sorry he was that he had not written to the Queen, and com- mended his last suit unto her Highness, viz. to have Ban- croft his successor : and being dead, none was so commonly talked of to succeed, as he. But the Queen bestowed it upon another, to wit, a courtly Prelate, Fletcher Bishop of Peterborough ; for such the Queen delighted in : who en- joying it two or three years, it came to pass according to Bishop Aylmer's last desires. Yet however Bancroft's suc- cession proved prosperous to the Church, it light heavy upon Aylmer's heir ; as we may see hereafter. 112 THE LIFE OF CHAP. X. The Bishop's last visitation. His death. His burial. His last will. His children and posterity. His last A GREAT burden of years lay now upon the aged Bi- visitation. sno p 5 an( j y et h e omitted not the care of his diocese : for in the year 1592, March 18, when his son the Archdeacon vi- sited his archdeaconry, he was present, to counsel, advise, and oversee. And the next year, viz. January 16, 1593, was the ancient Bishop's last visitation ; when Dr. Stanliop, his Chancellor, assisting him, or visiting in his name, every Minister was enjoined, among other things, to do what was somewhat extraordinary, (but this I suppose by order from above,) that the full state of each man might be the better known and examined ; it was, to bring, in a fair sheet of paper in writing under their hands, their parents, their schools where they were educated, their degrees, their age, the day and year of their letters of orders, when made Dea- con and when Priest, their presentation, institution, in- duction into their benefices, and their licences to preach the word of God, and where; and lastly, the Bishop that allowed them, since they officiated in the Church. These, with the frequent and careful visitations of his good consci- entious son the Archdeacon, and their rules, orders, coun- sels, instructions, tasks, and examinations, did great good among the Clergy of the city, especially towards the re- forming and quickening of them, and keeping them within their duty, and in the better discharge of it. Departs this Thus our Bishop continued, rubbing through many dis- hfe - couragements, but still persisting in the discharge of his episcopal function in preaching and governing his Church, and watchfulness over such as disturbed the peace or orders of it ; till June 3, 1594, when being arrived to a good old age, that is, to seventy-three, he departed at his palace at Fulham. His body was interred with due solemnity in his own cathedral church before St. George's chapel, which was in the north walk of the east part of that church, under BISHOP AYLMER. 113 a fair stone of gray marble with an inscription ; which, C H together with those of his two successors, Fletcher and * Vaughan, are long since defaced and taken away by sacri- legious hands, as Dugdale in his History of St. Paul's tells us. But that which was the inscription was as follows ; Hie jacet certissimam expectans resurrectionem sua. carnis D. JoJiannes Aylmer D. Episcopus Londini. Qui obiit diem suum an. Dom. 1594. cetat. sum 73. To- scnos annos Prcesul ; semel Exul, et idem Bis Pugil in causa religionis erat. By an authentic paper in my hands, it appears the vaca- tion of this bishopric was reckoned from June 5, 1594, to January following, when the temporalities were restored to Richard Fletcher, Bishop Aylmer's next successor f . What worldly estate and wealth he left behind him, it is His estate not evident ; but it is, that he made several purchases in London, in Lincolnshire, and in Essex ; and lent out mo- ney upon mortgages. Among his purchases in Essex, the chief was the manor of Mugden or Mowden Hall, in the parish of Hatfield, the seat of the family of the Aylmers to this day. Whatsoever his estate was, he carefully and pru- dently in his life-time divided it among his wife and children by an indenture octopartite ; which he mentioned and confirmed in his last will ; which bore date April 22, His last 1594, that is, not six weeks before his death. Therein he W1 "" willed to be buried in some convenient place in the ca- thedral of St. Paul's, on the north side, with some decent monument to be erected for him, and his figure set up, in imitation of that of John Colet, sometime Dean of the said church, standing on the south side. He gave by the said will 300/. to be paid in six years into the chamber of Lon- don, for the better maintaining of constant sermons at Paul's Cross : which sum his eldest son Samuel was to pay out of the rents of Mugden Hall ; and 100/. more, deposited with him by the Countess of Shrewsbury for the same purpose : » See Additions, Numb. VI. 114 THE LIFE OF CHAP, willing and advising, that in those sermons there should be X " some remembrance made of such benefactors. To his wife he bequeathed 20/. per aim. until such time as she should become possessor of certain houses in London. He gave to his second son, Theophilus, Archdeacon of London, 100/. owing from Mr. Newce, being remainder of the portion which his said son was by agreement to have with Mary, the said Newce's daughter ; the Bishop acknowledging he had received 100/. already of the said portion. He gave legacies to his two grandchildren, a son and a daughter of the said Theophilus ; and to little John and Judith, son and daughter of Squire that married his daughter ; and to the children of Judith Lynche, another of his daughters, that married Mr. Lynche, gentleman. He gave the manor of Muckleton alias Mugden Hall, with all his lands in Essex besides, to his eldest son Samuel. Certain lands in We- theringset, late the Lady Stafford's and Sir Edward Staf- ford's, he gave to his son Theophilus, or the money lent upon the same. All his lands in Rivesby in Lincolnshire he gave to his son John, who, as it seems, married and lived there. His son Samuel to take out of his library what philosophy books he pleased. The rest to be divided between three of his sons, Theophilus, Zachary, and an- other, who, as it seems, studied divinity. He bequeathed to the poor of London 100/. to the poor of Fulham 40/. to the poor of Hadham 51. His executors were his sons Samuel and Theophilus, Dr. Richard Vaughan his cousin, and Mr. Lynche his son-in-law. For the overseer of his will he appointed Dr. Foorth. The probation thereof bore date November 28, 1594. This is enough to shew the contents of his will. Now we will look into his family and children. His wife He married Judith, the daughter of Bures, or Buers, a dren d ' U " S 00 ^ house in Suffolk, being entitled the Bures of Bures. Joan, a daughter of Robert Bures, Esq. was married to Thomas King, a good family in the same county ; and after to Sir John Buck, Knight, about the year 1530. From which match or matches sprang manv noble and eminent BISHOP AYLMER. 115 families of the Mordaunts, Barrows, Bacons, Bucks, Gaudies, CHAP. . . X Tilneys, Sheltons, Hauts, Aylmers, Foliots, Vaughans, Hai- ' dens, Hassets, &c. I find one Esau Buers, Vicar of Istel- ^ " ss - . Collect. D. worth, who was ordained Priest by our Bishop anno 1577, Geo. Buck no question a relation of his. By this matron Judith, thej^ 1 ' P eDes Bishop had a numerous offspring; viz. seven sons ; Samuel, Theophilus, John, Zachary, Nathaniel, Tobel, and Ed- mund ; besides two or three daughters. Samuel, his son Ex Offio and heir, was left in good circumstances, as may be guessed ^^eldest from a purchase or purchases of lands, which cost the Bi-son. shop 16000. 7 . This Samuel was of Claydon Hall in Suffolk, and High Sheriff of that county in the reign of KingCharles I. He was bred to the law ; which, by certain note-books of his which I have seen, he seemed to be studious in. He married two wives. His former was Dorothy Hastings, daughter of Edward Hastings, of the Abbey of Leicester in Pratis: by whom he had no issue. His second was Ann, the eldest daughter of Edward Lord Brabazon, of Tamer's Court, near Dublin in Ireland ; who was the son (if I err not) of Sir William Brabazon, Lord Chief Justice of Ireland three times in six years, that is, from 1543 to 1549, in which year he died in the tents in Ulster, and was buried in Trinity church in Dublin, and his heart carried into England, to be buried there. This Lord Brabazon had three sons ; his eldest was William Earl of Meath ; the second, Wallop Brabazon, of Eaton in Herefordshire ; the third, Sir Anthony Brabazon, of Ireland. His daughters were six. The second was thrice married ; viz. ^o the Lord Montgomery, Sergeant Brereton, and Sir John Bramston, Lord Chief Justice of England. The third married to Rigby, of Lancashire. The eldest, viz. Ann, was linked to the said Samuel Aylmer, our Bishop's eldest son ; by whom he had divers children ; viz. John, Edward, An- thony, Elizabeth, and Alice: from which John sprung Brabazon Aylmer, late of Mowden Hall in the county of Essex, Esq. Justice of the Peace; who hath left three sons, Samuel, Anthony, and John ; and two daughters, the eldest married to John Godbold, of Territon Hall in the same i 2 116 THE LIFE OF CHAP, county, Esq. the other unmarried. And from Anthony, X ' the youngest son of the same Samuel, is descended another Brabazon Aylmer, the bookseller and publisher of this book ; who, out of due and honourable respects to the memory of his great grandfather, the Bishop, put me upon exposing these collections, and communicated some considerable papers and notices relating hereunto. Dr. Ayi- Theophilus, his second son, was bred up to the study of cond son. divinity, and commenced Dr. of Divinity, was Archdeacon of London, and Rector of Much Hadham in Hertfordshire : out of which parish he married his wife Mary, daughter of William Newce, (Thomas Newce, Esq. was anno 1617 High Sheriff of Hertfordshire, who, I suppose, was the said Wil- liam's son.) He was, if we may take Dr. Fuller's character of him, one of the most reverend and learned divines of his generation, and an excellent preacher : and preaching once before King James, the King took great satisfaction in his sermon, commending it much ; but being chiefly levelled against the Puritans, he thought he made use of his father the Bishop's notes, who little favoured that party. Among others the good and praiseworthy qualities of this man, he was an encourager of learning, and maintained some scholars at the University to be brought up to the ministry : among the which was one J ohn Squire, his nephew ; and by the said Theophilus's means possessed of the living of Shore- ditch, London : which favours the said Squire did openly acknowledge in his epistle to a Paul's Cross sermon by him preached anno Dom. 1623, whicli he dedicated unto him, and gratefully remembered there ; confessing it was he sent him to the University, procured his preferment there, and had been his patron ever since. This Squire's father was in such reputation with the Bishop, that he gave him one of his daughters in marriage. But how he proved after- wards, we shall see by and by. Some cl>a- We may take some character of this Dr. Aylmer from a b\m. r ° { l etter of his occasionally written to Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, a great man, now, or soon after, Lord High Treasurer, con- cerning tithes due to him from the said Earl's tenants ; for BISHOP AYLMER. 117 which he was fain to sue them. And to take off any dis- CHAP, pleasure that might arise to him on that occasion, he penned X ' a very handsome letter to him, set forth with much defe- rence to his Lordship, and expressive of much gravity and sense of piety. And not being very long, I shall insert it. " Mine humble duty in all due sort premised. My very " honourable good Lord, the constant report of your Lord- " ship's religious and just disposition in all affairs whatso- " ever, hath emboldened me (by nature timerous) to solicite " your Honour in a word or two for mine own self. May " it therefore please your Lordship to understand, that I, " being Parson of Much and Little Hadham in Hartford- " shire, have a year since (or thereabout) commenced suit " against some of Little Hadham (who may happly be your " Lordship's tenants) for tyth of underwoods, by all law to " me due. This very name of suit, though it might with " some persons fore-condemn me, either as covetous or con- " tentious ; yet dare I mention it unto your Honour, whose " upright judgment righting many, will never admit that " prejudice should wrong me or any. " First therefore I protest in the sight of the Heart's only " Searcher, that not any sinister affection, but necessities " forceable compulsion, hath urged hereunto. Secondly, " whereas it may be thought, that my beginning this suit " with some of your Lordship's tenants may imply want of " due regard in me towards your Honour, I (upon my for- " mer protestation) assure your Lordship, that these men " being the first, who (after demaund of tyth) were first to " me presented, as those that carried their woods; not leaving " their tyth, they were, not voluntate mea electi, but sorte " sua relicti, et oblati to the first trial of this suit. Thirdly " and lastly, mine humble suit unto your Lordship is, that " though your tenants may expect your honourable patron- " age, (which as their Lord you may afford them without " wrong-doing unto any,) yet it would please yon (of that " rehgious integrity which tyeth the souls of all good men " unto you) to reserve for me (your Lordship's poor, true, i 3 118 THE LIFE OF HAP. " and affectionate suppliant) such favour and grace in your ' " eyes, as that law having free passage, right being tryed, " my poor estimation with your Lordship may, so far forth " as I shall not deserve the contrary, abide untainted : I in " this and in all things wholly submitting my self to your " Lordship's godly command. Thus unfainedly praying " for your Honour's continual prosperity in this world, " and eternal happiness in the world to come, I most hum- " bly take my leave. " Your Lordship's in all duty to command, " Theophilus Aylmer." London, this 8th of Feb. 1605. Some fur- We have not yet said all of the Reverend Son of this lef'of Right Reverend Father; but having been so singular a Aylmer. person in his life, I will here relate some few things more concerning him from papers communicated to me by Mr. Aylmer the bookseller, to whom he was great uncle. As this divine was an excellent, so a frequent preacher; and that even to his last and crazy age. He had also an un- common gift in prayer, whereby he was enabled to put up fit and proper petitions to God, according as the different states and necessities of men and things required. He trod in his father's footsteps in his earnest endeavours by all sober and rational means to persuade his people to a due ob- servance of the Common Prayer, and the orders prescribed in the worship of God ; so that it was observed, his congre- gation was as reverent and uniform in the public service as any congregation in England beside: for his father had bred him up to be a true son of the Church of England. And yet he was not at all of a contentious spirit, nor placed his conformity in continual disputations and tossing of argu- ments, or in angry and reproachful terms against such as differed from him, or the present constitution. For he was a mild and peaceable man, retaining the truth in peace. c ha- And as he had considerable incomes from the Church, or otherwise, so his charity was extraordinary: and that not only towards the poor within his own precincts and parishes, BISHOP AYLMER. 119 but towards others that needed ; especially poor scholars and CHAP, poor strangers; whether Spanish, Dutch, French, Italian, X ' Grecian exiles: gratefully remembering, no question, that his father was once an exile for his religion, as they now were : to whom therefore he could not but have a peculiar compassion. Mr. Squire, his nephew by his sister, Minister of St. Leonard, Shoreditch, London, would often shew to him the necessities of certain persons, and ask an alms on their behalf; jvhen he would usually give him twice as much as he demanded ; whence the said Squire would say, he was constrained to conceal from him many objects of charity, because he conceived him to be too bountiful in his liberality, even to the injuring of his family. So that it was said by the foresaid person, who knew him and his concerns intimately well, that had he been but ordinarily frugal, he might have reserved from his charity to the poor, as much as he left for the entire maintenance of his wife and family. It was this made him say on his death-bed, " that the poor " could not expect any gift at his death, because he had " given them as much as he could, while he was alive ; and " that, to his soul's comfort, he had already made his own " hands to be his executors, and his own eyes his overseers. v ' And as he was thus of a charitable, so he was also of an Humble humble and mortified spirit. He exercised himself upon j^J" 017 " occasions in praying and fasting; living contentedly and thankfully with what he had. And though he were one of the ancientest Chaplains to King James, and might have deservedly attained more preferment in the Church, and have been placed in a higher sphere, in respect of his fa- ther and his own learning, when many of his inferiors and juniors obtained greater and more wealthy places, yet he never repined nor envied. His preparation for death, and his behaviour of himself His papa- in his sickness, was remarkable, and truly Christian. He ™ t a ' t ° | " ,or was at first taken with a feverish distemper, which though not violent, yet he apprehended would cause his death, say- ing, Nemo moritur sine fibre. Wherefore his first work was to put his house in order, and to make his will : and i 4 120 THE LIFE OF CHAP, then raised up his mind to frequent holy and heavenly thoughts ; quickening himself by these words ; Quo propin- quior morti, eo Icetior ; quo vicinior carlo, long'ior a terra. He enjoined one of his nearest and dearest friends, that when he should perceive him at the point of death, he should prompt him to say these words ; Lord have mercy upon me ; Lord Jesus receive my soul. Which his friend, when he perceived his death approaching, accordingly did ; and though he could not speak the words, y#t by the lift- ing up his hand he signified the repeating of them in his heart. In the beginning of his sickness his friends persuaded him to make use of physic. He answered, " It needed not ; " he should be well. However,' 1 said he, " I commit and " submit my body unto them, as unto God's instruments : " yet with this caution, that they deal plainly with me ; " and when they find their art ineffectual, then they render " my poor carcass to me again, to be ordered according to " my own direction." When he was asked often, how he did, he would say, " I thank God, heart-whole.'" And once, having laid one hand on his heart, and lifting up the other to heaven, he said, " The glory above giveth no room to sick- " ness." When he found he approached nearer to death, according to the order of the Church, he made his confes- sion to the Preacher, his assistant, and received his absolu- tion; and desired the Communion, but death came too hastily, and prevented. When the Preacher praying with him came to the suffrage, Let the enemy have 710 power against him, he suddenly interposed with an observed cou- rage, "I am assured he shall not." He shewed his paternal and conjugal love by these ex- pressions : " Let none," saith he, " think that I have left " my children poor : no, I have left them heavenly riches." And when his wife wept by him, he observing it said, "Why, " how now, sweet heart : dost thou by those dear tears " wound thine own heart and mine ? But mine is passion- " proof. Worldly occasions have many nights separated " us, and the morning hath rejoined us. It is but one BISHOP AYLMER. 131 " night, one short night, I shall he from thee, when the CHAP. " glorious morning, by that never-setting Sun of Glory, ' " shall eternally bring us together." Like a good pastor, he shewed a great concern for the well-doing of his flock after he was dead and gone. " As St. Paul,'" said he, " prayed for his brethren according to the flesh, that all " Irsael might be saved ; so do I pray for my flock, that " all my people may be saved. And to this end I earnestly " entreat the Lord, that after my departure he will send " faithful and painful pastors among them, who may break " the bread of life sincerely unto them, and in all godliness " go in and out before them. 11 When his death came with nearer approaches towards him, he shewed greater acts of faith and fearlessness of it. He declared he forgave all men, as he desired God should forgive him. " Let my people know, 11 added he, " that " their pastor died undaunted, and not afraid of death. I " bless my God, I have no fear, no doubt, no reluctation ; " but an assured confidence in the sin-overcoming merits of " Jesus Christ. 11 And in the conclusion of all, he shut his own eyes with his own hands, dying in the Lord Jesus in the month of January 1625, the first year of King Charles I. a year memorable for a severe pestilence; in which time died fifty-four preachers of London. He was buried in his own parish church, and honoured with a funeral sermon preached by Dr. James Usher, the most learned Archbishop of Armagh. And all this we have said of the Bishop's se- cond son, Theophilus. His third son, and his namesake, John, perhaps a soldier, His tbird for some service, or testimony of honour the Prince thought son ' Jolin ' fit to shew him, was knighted, and styled Sir J ohn Aylmer, of Rigby in the county of Lincoln, Knight. He married Susan, daughter and heiress of Sampson of Suffolk. Of his fourth and fifth and seventh sons, Zachary, Na-His fourth, thaniel, and Edmund, I know little; only that Zachary andse',^" 11 Edmund, as they were brothers, so they were friends, a sons - most entire affection passing between them. As a notable testimony whereof, when Edmund lay sick, Zachary never 122 THE LIFE OF CHAP, left him, but was continually with him night and day to X ' the very last ; never to be parted from each other till death made the separation : and that was not long ; which Zachary himself, as it were by some hidden instinct, was aware of. For when the joiner came to take measure of the corpse of his brother to make his coffin, Zachary at the same time ordered him to take his measure also for the same intent ; and his coffin was made too ; in which he was enshrined in a short time after, and died without issue. A commendable instance of that affection and love that ought to be between . near relations, and such as nature hath tied together in blood. Tobel, Lis Tobel, his sixth son, had Archbishop Whitgift for his sixth son. • a Fuller. godfather, who so named him according to the signification of the word, (that is, The Lord is good,) in memory of a great deliverance by the goodness of God this child's mo- ther received, and the child too, cast out of her coach, being big with child, and no harm followed. He was styled, Tobel Aylmer, of Writtle in Essex, gentleman. He took to wife Mary, daughter of John Sammes, of Toppingohal in Hat- Ex Oft'io^ field Peverel, in Essex ; and had by her John Aylmer, his eldest son, Rector of Bletneso and Melchborn in the county of Bedford ; and Tobel, of London, gentleman, who mar- ried Margaret, daughter of John Casinghurst, of Lether- head in the county of Surrey : besides which two sons he had a daughter, named Mary, married to John Acton, son of John Acton the King's goldsmith : which second Tobel had issue two daughters, Mary and Margaret ; as appears by a visitation of London taken by S. George about the year 1636. His daugh- The Bishop's daughters were, Judith, who married Wil- ters ' liam Linch, of Kent ; and Elizabeth, married to Sir John Foliot, of Pirton in the county of Worcester, Knight ; who had issue Aylmer Foliot; and he Aylmer Foliot, of Yard- ley in the same county, a worthy and a learned man, and of a good estate, lately deceased. The Bishop had a third daughter, (or one of the former by a second marriage,) Dr. Squire, matched with Dr. Squire, a Divine and Preacher. There BISHOP AYLMER. 123 be two copies of verses of his extant upon the death of CHAP. Bishop Jewel, one in Latin, the other in Greek. This Bi- X " shop he styled his master in those verses ; Heul miki, mors rapu'd dominum. So that Squire seems either to have been his Chaplain, or brought up under him ; and that that Bishop exhibited to him in the University. And I find he had in that Bishop's life a dispensation for the vicarage of Conmore in the diocese of Sarum. This man was somewhat fantastical, as appears in that he would needs preach his own wedding sermon ; which he did from that text, It is not good for Adam to be alone ; Adam being his own Christian name. But this was not the worst of him ; for he proved an unkind husband, Squire the and a dissolute man. She was a virtuous woman, and well ^ n _jJJ! brought up. But he, to cover his disloyalty to her bed, unworthily feigned an intrigue between her and a Knight ; and, as we are told, framed a letter from the Knight unto Brief view her, which was indeed his own inventing, to bespatter her^j]^ State reputation. The Bishop sent for the Knight, and found church, out the truth : and soon after, arguing the case between him and his son-in-law, soundly cudgelled him for his baseness; which Martin Marprelate hearing of, thus abu- sively related it; " that he went to buffets with his son-in- " law for a bloody nose." He had good preferments in the Church. In one whereof, Squire a by the statutes of the church where it was, he was bound prod ' 6a1- to keep hospitality ; and to have every Saturday three Vi- cars Choral at supper ; and every Tuesday to feed all the poor that came to his house for alms: and there came weekly above ninety persons. But as he was vicious, so he was of a prodigal humour, and ran much in debt : and his houses and chancels belonging to his livings fell into great decay. He was also in the Queen's debt for first-fruits and tenths ; and was fain to make use of a protection. So that at last the Lord Treasurer, the Bishop, and his eldest son, and four other commissioners, took the management of his debts, the Archbishop of Canterbury having granted his 124 THE LIFE OF CHAP, creditors the sequestration of his livings. This sequestra- ' tion the Bishop procured to stop his vice and profuseness, and to see his just debts satisfied; taking care that his al- lowance out of the sequestration should be but a bare sub- sistence; because his father-in-law was minded hereby, if possible, to reduce this lavish sinful man to thrift and repent- ance. But Squire laboured with the Lord Treasurer that he might have these sequestrators nominated by the Bishop removed, and this sequestration taken off : for that all his creditors would have been content upon his own word (ex- cepting Dr. Bingham) without sureties to have borne with him, and to have received portionally as his revenues had come in, if the sequestration had been released. Whereas he did then daily more and more incur forfeitures. That it were better for him to resign all his livings, and to com- mit his body to his creditors, than to suffer the Bishop of London (in whose debt he said he was not, but the Bishop in his) to keep his living from him, and to receive all the profits into his own purse. That he could stay no longer at Court, partly for want, and partly for fear of imprison- ment, his protection being ended. That in his journey he must have begged, had not Sir Francis Knolles given him some money to bring him home. And when he should come home, he had not one penny to maintain him and his fa- mily : and yet he was bound by oath, and the statutes of the church to which he belonged, to keep hospitality. This was the substance of a letter he wrote to the said Lord Treasurer, August 12, 1587. And the said compassionate Lord the said day, either by letter or word of mouth, moved the Bishop for some favour to be shewed this spendthrift. Whereat the very same day the Bishop signified his mind in this grave and earnest manner to the Treasurer : The Bi- " My singular good Lord, (my duty remembered.) I shop's letter « tmst vour g0 od Lordship will have due consideration of concerning JO I Squire. " my lewd son-in-law, that neither by pity, whereto you " are naturally enclined, nor by importunity of friends, " which such a lewd fellow shall commonly find ready, you BISHOP AYLMER. 125 " will forget any piece of that fear which you owe unto CHAP. " God, or that singular care which your Lordship hath " ever had to cleanse the Church, the Spouse of Christ, of " all hypocrites and filthy livers. And upon that confi- " dence I am bold to pray your good Lordship, that such " an aeolastus, and dilapidator rerum ecclesiasticarum, shall " not carry any piece of Christ's patrimony away to main- " tain his vicious life : or that he and his friends shall find " such favour in Court, that a sequestration, granted by " my Lord of Canterbury's Grace, and of his colleagues, " men of great wisdom, knowledge, and consideration, " should now be discredited, (a matter whereof there is no " precedent,) to bring the fruits of Squire's livings to hungry " men's hands, as those two were which were offered to your " Lordship ; whereby the unthrift might make some piece " of money, and so run away ; and so the creditors be de- " feated of all satisfaction ; which hitherto they have had " good hope of. The sequestrators are for one piece, Mr. " Francis Hastings and Mr. Purefoy, of Leicestershire ; the " others, my eldest son, and one Mr. Kemp, of the Temple, " Utterbarister ; whom your Lordship may at all times " cause to be called to account : where otherwise, being " committed to such needy fellows as he hath and will ; ' bring in, your Lordship shall see a mervailous great in- " convenience to follow : whereof I shall not need to speak ; " for your wisdom will have thereof sufficient consideration. " Thus praying God to direct your Lordship in this and " all other things, I commit you to the most favourable " blessings of God. From my manour of Much Hadham, « this 12th of August, 1587." The Bishop's vexation with this man, both for his un- kindness to his daughter, and his other immoralities, was such, that he accused him at the Council-table, where he gave the Bishop sharp words. But in his own vindication he soon after ventured to make his protestation to the Lord Treasurer, (which I must not omit,) that for matters of crimination objected by the Bishop, he was innocent ; and 126 THE LIFE OF CHAP, had offered himself to trial in any court in England, saving X ' only where his father-in-law was a Judge; although he knew, as he said, that all the civil lawyers almost stood in awe of him ; and the rather for that the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury had joined with him in this action. He pro- tested before the eternal God, that he had ever, until their meeting at the Council-table, in all humble and most dutiful sort, reverenced his father-in-law, and most entirely loved and yet did love his wife; although he had been greatly abused, and strangely dealt withal. What afterwards became of this loose man I know not. But his son John seems to have been left in low circum- stances ; whom his uncle, Dr. Theophilus Aylmer, brought up and maintained at the University, and proved a sober and honest man. He enjoyed the benefice of St. Leonard, Shoreditch, London, by the means of his uncle, and other preferments ; which he gratefully acknowledged in print, as was said before. He was endued with good learning, as appears by his sermon preached at Paul's Cross anno 1523, upon the second Commandment ; which hath a great deal of reading in it. The Bi- Having said all this of our Bishop, and his children, I Lid P femUy. e might add somewhat of his name and family, which was ancient and genteel. I find several of the Aylmers in the city of Norwich about the beginning of the sixteenth cen- tury commencing 1500. In St. Peter's church in Norwich was buried one Richard Aylmer, with an old inscription in Latin verses upon him; which shew him to have been Mayor of that city, and derived of an honourable stock. Which verses began thus : Weever's Aylmer Riehardus procerum de stipite natus ; Mon.p.802. j g q Uon d arn Major urbisjacet hie tumulatus, &c. His wife was named Joan ; and by her he had posterity ; is charactered for a good and a charitable man ; and was buried anno milleno D. bino cum duodeno ,• that is, 1514, if 1 take it right. And before him there was BISHOP AYLMER. 127 one Thomas Aylmer, of Norwich, grocer; whose last will CHAP, bare date 1500; who therein left a legacy to his aunt, Mar- X ' garet Parker : which Margaret seems to have been grand- mother to Matthew Parker, Queen Elizabeth's first and most worthy and well-deserving and learned Archbishop of Canterbury. Of this family, I suppose, was Laurence Aylmer, Sheriff Stow's Surv of London anno 1501, and Mayor 1507; serving out the year upon the decease of William Brown, Mayor. This Laurence was a draper, and son of Thomas Aylmer, of Ellesnam in Essex, a neighbour county to Norfolk. And of the same family I make no doubt was that George Geo. Ayl- Aylmer, one of the chief of the Friars of the Priory of St. ™X'n° of John of Jerusalem in London, who at the dissolution of Jerusalem, religious houses under King Henry VIII. was one of those stout Knights of the Priory that would not surrender the house to the King, as many of the other monasteries did. But however, when this house was dissolved by act of Par- liament, he fared pretty well, notwithstanding his obsti- nacy, having 100/. pension allowed him for life by the same act. To all the rest let me add, that I find one Mrs. Fraunces MSS. in Aylmer, a gentlewoman of the Court, who was one of the °* r c " Ar " ladies that attended Queen Jane, King Henry VIII.'s most beloved wife, on horseback at her most splendid and so- lemn funeral S. Our Bishop kept a good house, having eighty servants The Bi- with him in his family. And besides, he built and repaired * ll0p ' s , J ' r housekeep- houses, bridges, scoured and cleansed ditches and common ing and sewers, &c. in which he spent more than any Bishop 0 f ex P enses - London before him had done in forty years. And whereas it was not unusual in those times for Bishops to obtain the Queen's release of first-fruits, he generously forbore to sue for it, considering the Queen's great charges. And yet by his good and provident husbandry he laid His pur- out 16000Z. in purchase of lands not long before his death. chase ' e See Additions, Numb. VII. 128 THE LIFE OF CHAP. And when he died, his goods of all sorts came to about X ' 1000/. ; which was most of it spent upon his funerals. His diiapi- But notwithstanding all the charges and expenses which the Bishop bestowed in necessary reparations, such were the decays of that great structure of St. Paul's, and his ancient palace at London, that three years after the Bishop's death the cost of putting them in repair was computed at 6513/. 14?. as Bishop Bancroft, his next successor but one, brought For which in ; who sued Mr. Aylmer, the Bishop's son and heir, for frof"^*" dilapidations, (as the Bishop had sued his predecessor,) and his sod. obtained a sentence in the Arches against him for 4210/. l.y. 8d. But, to speak the truth, Paul's church had been in a decaying condition before Aylmer came to the see; and what he and his predecessors could do themselves, or gather from others, towards the repairs, could not effect it. The sentence aforesaid took not effect, because the personal estate was not sufficient to satisfy the sum awarded. Bancroft thereupon desired the Lord Treasurer's good liking and furtherance, to prefer a bill in the High Court of Parlia- ment for sale of so much of his lands as should suffice to discharge the dilapidations, considering the said lands were bought with part of that money that should have kept the church and houses in repair: and added, that it had cost him a thousand marks to repair the house at London, being ready to fall down when he came to it. It was said also by the said Bancroft, that Bishop Aylmer made 6000/. of his woods, and left scarce enough to find the present Bishop yearly fuel ; and that he let out leases, some for an hundred years and above, and some for fifty. But he now suing Mr. Aylmer at the law, some caution must be had in the reader how he takes all in the strictest sense, especially having no opportunity of hearing the other side, and re- membering what the Bishop himself in his lifetime urged concerning his woods. I do not know what issue this came to : it seems Mr. Aylmer set him at defiance, and said, Let the Bishop of London repair how he list, but he should re- pair nothing with his money. But I have been told by some of his posterity, that he was fain to part with a round BISHOP AYLMER. 129 sum at last, and to sell some part of liis estate to make sa- CHAP, ti-faction. x CHAP. XI. Some observation I upon Bishop Aijhner. Certain things charged upon hint chared. The Lord Burghlcy his J'riend. cannot leave our Bishop vet, till we have in some A review reflections and considerations taken a review of him, and BUbop.' " looked into his nature and disposition, his good acquiretl accomplishments of learning and judgment, his friends and enemies, and what things were charged upon him as faults in the administration of his episcopal function. I shall begin with the last of these. For however care-Fau'»> fully and conscientiously the Bishop behaved himself in his npoTblni. office, he could not escape many and various censures and ill representations made of him and his actions. But I must premise, that the ground of all the accusations that were preferred to the Queen and Council against him, for the' most part were his prosecutions of such as went contrarv to the rules and orders appointed in the Church. For he spared not his pains to keep the Church of England in that stay of doctrine and discipline wherein it was settled, when with so much mature advice and deliberation it shook off* Popery at first. The greatest broil he met with was, that he was reported Wronging to have made a great waste of his woods, to the injurv and felling the impoverishment of the see. In the year 1579, he made w " 0 ' 1 - indeed a considerable fall of wootl and timber. The inform- ation whereof was brought to the Council : and the Lord Treasurer soon wrote to him upon this complaint ; and in his free and plain manner blamed him for what he had done ; and withal told him, that there was a Bishop once deprived for such a thing. But the Bishop on the other K ISO THE LIFE OF CHAP, hand a little nettled, and, being somewhat a hot man in his nature, called these undigested surmises; and, conscious that he had done nothing but what he could answer, was resolved to stand to the justifying of his own doings. But what his pleas and vindication of himself was, we have seen already. Charged for The Bishop was again blamed for his too hastily and for mar- * negligently granting licences for marriage, without due exa- nage. mination concerning the consent of the parents, guardians, and friends of the parties to be married. The occasion whereof was, that in July 1583 some noble person's son or daughter was matched unequally and unhappily, by means of one of these licences. Whereupon the complaint was brought before the Council-table h . And the officer named Mr. Blackwel, was sent for by a warrant from the Lord Treasurer, to appear before the Council, to examine him about granting this licence. But both he and Dr. Stanhop, the Bishop's Chancellor, protested they neither knew nor heard of the fault till the Lord Treasurer's warrant came : whose charge they confessed it was, if they had been pre- sent, to have looked unto it. The Bishop himself was also sent for to the Council, where he was twitted for his li- cences : though if there were any fault committed in this particular, the blame lay in his officers, not in him. But effectually to prevent such unfortunate accidents for the future, out of his good zeal and fatherly care, he forthwith sent order to Dr. Stanhop, inhibiting him for granting any licences at all : which he professed most willingly to obey : but withal desired, that there might be one uniform order in all courts, whence these licences were to be granted. Faculties. Eor the courts out of which they w r ere taken, besides that of the Bishop of London, were that of the Archbishop of Canterbury's Vicar General, the Court of Faculties, whereof Dr. Lewin was Judge; the Consistory of every Bishop: and in some places the Commissary in partibus used it ; and some Archdeacons challenged it by prescription : there was h See Additions, Numb. VIII. BISHOP AYLMER. 181 also the exemption of the Tower ; by pretence of which an c H A P. ancient Priest, commonly called Old Sir Roger, did marry x1, without any licence. For, as Stanhop prudently signified Old Sir to the Bishop, if he made special restraint of his licences, H ° scr- and all other courts were left at liberty, although the judges of those courts were careful themselves herein, yet their courts being kept in London, it was easy for those that meant evil to seek that in one place, which they might not have in another, as daily experience shewed in the ex- emption of the Tower ; by virtue whereof Old Sir Roger married many a couple, which licences could not or would not be obtained. And if other courts were not restrained, as well as that of the Bishop of London, as the subject would receive no benefit, so a blot would only remain upon the Bishop's court, and his jurisdiction be in part over- thrown; when men should know, that they were driven to leave his court to sue to another. Therefore upon these considerations, and for a due regu- lation of these licences every where, the said learned Civilian craved of the Bishop, that he would endeavour with their Honours of the Council, that certain restraints might be put upon all courts where such licences were wont to issue out : first, for the form of them ; and secondly, for certain limitations to be observed concerning them. For the forms, he sent the Bishop a copy of that of the court of Canterbury, and another of that of London. Whereby it might appear, that the latter was a great deal more strait in respect of the manner of the licences, and the consent of the parents. And if by comparing botfi it should be found, that that form of London were less disordered, then that his Lordship would procure that form might generally stand. The limitations to be observed to be these : First, That no licence pass, but that it be directed to some certain parish, and either to the Parson, Vicar, or Cu- rate, who did continually serve there. So might the officers know upon present search, where to answer the delivery of their licences. k 2 132 THE LIFE OF CHAP. Secondly, That no licence should pass for any maid, (rich or poor,) but that the clause in English subscribed be set unto it. For that every Minister was not to understand Latin. Thirdly, That none that came for licence should be al- lowed to it by the Register : but that he should bring him to the Judge, to examine the cause and the necessity of the licence before it pass. And so the Register to receive his instructions at the Judge's hands, in presence of the party that sued for the licence. Fourthly, That no bond under two hundred pounds should be taken for any licence of the meanest. And so according to the quality of the person, the sum of the bond to be raised. Fifthly, That one clause in every bond to be taken be. that the parties be of that quality, and no other than they are named in the licence; as either by the name of his occupation, trade, gentry, or upward. Sixthly, That no licence pass for any maid, but that the quality of the parents be set down truly : and that likewise to be a clause in the bond. Seventhly, That where the party himself to be married did not come to sue about the licence, the solicitor, or who- soever else did follow it, should put in known security that the parties were of that quality, and of no other than he did avouch them to be. These were the Civilian's restraints devised for marriage licences, recommended by him to the Bishop : to which he in his wisdom might add more. But in behalf of defence and maintenance of the Bishop's court and jurisdiction, and for the care he had that they might not be noted above all others to be restrained from that which was the liberty of others ; he humbly required of the Bishop, that these, or what other orders soever were thought necessary, might be by the Queen's honourable Council given generally to all courts, and all limited to one manner of bounds. Heischarg- Another time an accusation was brought to the Queen disorders in' against our Bishop by some of his back-friends, and that BISHOP AYLMER. only upon hearsay; which reflected upon his care of seeing CHAP. due conformity observed in his diocese; a thing apt to pro- voke the Queen against her Bishops more than any other. Therefore they told her of reports of great disorders in Essex, a considerable part of his diocese; and that the Ministers there in their several churches had ways and forms of their own, all different from the appointed service ; and that there were not seven churches in the whole county one like another. This was a severe charge indeed, if it had been true. This happened in November 1581. The Bi- shop understanding such an information to be brought to the Queen against him, was not a little nettled at it; and forth with caused a diligent search to be made in Essex. And after all had not found three churches in the whole county, wherein the service of the book was not observed. Where- upon he prayed the Lord Treasurer, that he would let her Majesty know (and that on his credit) the falsehood of this report, and the conformable condition of his diocese : add- ing his resentment, that any should so far abuse her Ma- jesty upon credit of others, and tell the Queen matters not of their own knowledge. And to signify his diligence in his place to cure all disorders, he shewed the Lord Trea- surer, how by them of the ecclesiastical Commission orders were given out, that Apparitors and officers should on Lord's days go from church to church to see what confor- mity \\as used everywhere, and to certify accordingly. Of this also the Bishop thought convenient that the said Peer should advise the Queen, and to understand further her pleasure in the same. In these and divers other matters, there wanted not for Desires to persons to misrepresent him to the Queen; which, when IheQueen . V they were better and more throughly known and under- stood, proved but calumnies. And therefore when some- time the Queen seemed to give too much credit to these reports, the Bishop would remind her of the request he made to her upon his first access to his charge, desiring he might enjoy the promise she had then made him thereupon : that his adversaries might not carry it away without his an- k 3 134 THE LIFE OF CHAP, swer, nor she condemn him without his deserts. And when ' he found his enemies aspersing him liberally, and he not called to speak in his own vindication, he would sometimes be a remembrancer to the Treasurer, and say, he did not doubt her Majesty would graciously call to her remem- brance what a princely promise she made him more than once at his first coming to that place, that whatsoever should be informed against him, he should come to his answer. The performance whereof he hoped she would honourably grant him. Marpre- By the above written it appears, that our Bishop wanted ders of this neither enemies nor slanderers. Whereof one was Maddocks, Bishop. wno re f ram ed not from shewing his spite against him, even before the Lord Treasurer himself, telling him, that the Bishop's dealings were under the censures of' many, and his life ga ined evil speeches of all. But it must be marked that a great part, or most of these his ill-willers, were such as he procured by that which he counted the discharge of his own duty and conscience, namely, the pressing obedience to the established Church and Liturgy. These men of the separation threw loads of reproaches and vilifications upon him. And every one of them Martin Marprelate carefully picked up, and howsoever slenderly vouched, he clapped into his book, the more to expose the Bishop. Some, and the chief whereof, we will here mention. Detaining He told a lamentable story of the Bishop for detaining goods. stolen goods, viz. a parcel of cloth found within his manor of Fulham, left there by certain thieves, who had taken it from certain diers living at the Old Swan in Thames-street. But when the diers came to challenge their cloth, the Bi- shop said it was his own, because taken within his own lordship: and that if it was theirs, the law should pass upon the thieves, and then he would talk further with them. The thieves were tried and executed, and they con- fessed the cloth to be theirs that claimed it. But notwith- standing the diers could never get their cloth. With this the scurrilous author made sport, saying, the cloth was good blue, and so might well serve for the liveries of the BISHOP AY L ME It. 135 Bishop's men; and good green, and so would serve for his CHAP, cushions, and the coverings of his tables. X1 " Another story was told of him, which I put also among Wronging the rank of his slanders. That one George Allen, being his s rocer - the Bishop's grocer, and dying, Tho. Allen and Rich. Al- worth, merchants of London, were his executors. And finding in the books of the deceased the Bishop to owe lil. odd monev*, on Easter-Wednesday, of all the days of the year, they waited upon him at his palace at London for the said money, for that they were to dispose of it according to the trust reposed in them. But that the Bishop called them rascals and villains, saying, that he owed the deceased no- thing, and that he had a general acquittance to shew. But when they desired him to shew his discharge, and they should be satisfied, he would shew them none, but bade them go sue him. And then they replied, Do you use us thus for asking our due ? We would you should know, we are no such vile persons. To whom the Bishop again, Away, citizens ! nay, you are rascals ; you are worse than wicked mammon. And so lifting both his hands, and fling- ing them down again, said, You are thieves, you are co- zeners. Take that for a Bishop's blessing ; and so get you hence : and so thrust them out of doors. But when they shortly after went to bring the matter to further trial, he sent a messenger to them confessing the debt. Yet they could not get the money to this day. Another of his enemies 1 slanders was, that he kept one Keeping Benison, a poor man, in the Clink, for I cannot tell how ^J^^ tlie long, unjustly without cause. They threw it also as an heinous reproach on him, that Ordaining he ordained his porter that waited at his gate, for a Min- his P ortcr- ister. These and divers other stories were but the effects of a These ca- calumniating spirit ; and were either false, or, if there were ^""d^ff any truth in them, they were so put together, as to make that criminal and heinous, which indeed was justifiable, or at least excusable. But the libeller, to set out his pasquil, raked all things by all reports from all the sycophants in k 4 136 THE LIFE OF CHAP, the world, and made no choice of men or matter, so that it ' might serve his turn ; as an author in those times, (sup- Admonit. posed to be Cowper, Bishop of Winchester,) in his answ er People of to Martin's libel, speaks ; who wiped off all these foul and annoTas.o ¥ n o representations of this and other worthy Bishops in Queen Elizabeth's reign, and set in true light the disguised stories told of them. And from him to assoil these dire accusations* The busi- ness between the Bishop and the diers in truth was thus. That upon notice given to the said Bishop, that such cloth was waived within his manor of Fulham, and left in a ditch there, and no owner known, he presently, hoping to take them that brought it thither, or at least to save the same from purloining or miscarrying, appointed the same to be watched divers nights. And in the end, hearing neither of the owners, nor of them that so waived it, willed the same to be brought to his house in Fulham, and there to be kept for him or them which by law ought to have it, were it in respect of the first property, or of the alteration thereof by means of the liberties. Whereupon a good space after, the diers indeed came to the Bishop and claimed the cloth, and sought by earnest means to have it again, without making any proof that the cloth was theirs, or that the same cloth was it, for which the thieves were executed, or that fresh suit was made after the said thieves for the same. But upon conference had with learned lawyers therein, it was re- solved, that the property of this cloth was altered, and trans- ferred to the liberties. And so the diers themselves found ; else they would by law have sought remedy ere this, three years being now past since this pretended loss of the cloth. Yet nevertheless, so far had the Bishop been from exacting the extremity, that offer had been made to the diers of a good part of the cloth, where in law they had lost all : and farther to restore all, or to make sufficient recompense, if by law it ought to be so, upon the examination of the truth of the cause. Marprelate indeed called this down- right theft, though it were taken and claimed by right and law, because the true owners were defeated. And this is BISHOP AYLMER. 137 no more than the law doth in other eases : as in strays, pro- CHAP, claimed and kept a vear and a day, according to the law, Xl ' the property is altered, and transferred to the lord from the true owner. So is it for stolen cattle, brought bona fide to the open market. The first owners property is gone, and the buyer hath it. And so it was for waived goods, as was that cloth. So that herein the Bishop did but maintain the common known right and privilege of his manor, and no otherwise than any other lord of a manor would and might do in the like case. But to shew that he had not so great a desire to detain the cloth as the libeller presumed, he oftentimes asked an officer of his. how it happened that the dier- came not for it : for he had been ever ready, and still was, (and so the apologist seemed to have warrant from him to declare,) to deliver it to them, or the value thereof, if it proved to be theirs. As to the executors of Allen the grocer, it is true the Bi- shop was somewhat moved to hear his name to be in the mer- chants* books ; a thing which he ever so precisely avoided, that commonly he sent to them he had to do with, warning them to deliver nothing in his name, without his own hand, or ready money. Hence if peradventure, provoked by the executors, he used some sharp words in a matter that was so sudden and so strange to him, it must be placed among human frailties. But certain it is, that though not at that time, yet very shortly after, the debt was discharged; and that long before Martin's railing book came forth, excepting ten pounds, which the said executors themselves for a time respited. The business the Bishop had with one Barnabe Benison, Benison s who called himself student in dhinity, and who for his mattCT * perverseness was kept in the Clink half a year and more, was thus. This man had studied for some time at Geneva; and after a convenient stay returned into England, full fraught with the study of innovation and disobedience, set- ting up his nation in London : where he was married by some other order different from the book and usage of the Church of England : and it seems bore out himself by 138 THE LIFE OF CHAP, grave Mr. Fox, the martyrologist ; who, being mistaken in XI " him, favoured him at first, but afterwards acknowledged with grief of heart that he had been abused by him. Now Benison gathered conventicles, refused to go to his parish church, sought to set all in combustion with schism in the city. Whereupon he was called before Sir Nic. Wood- roff, a grave citizen, (that had been Lord Mayor anno 1580,) and the Recorder; who found him in such an humour, that they meant to have sent him to prison. But because he was of the Clergy, they thought good to com- mit him to his Ordinary. The Bishop's Ordinary travailed with him most earnestly to bring him to the Church, and become orderly ; but after all could profit nothing with hiin. Wherefore he sent him again to the sessions, to the Lord Mayor and the Judges. After they had dealt with him, and could find at his hands nothing but railing, they referred him to the Bishop ; who finding in him unspeak- able disobedience to the Queen and her laws, offered him the oath usually tendered by the Commission, which he contemptuously and spitefully refused. Which being cer- tified according to order, he was sent to the King's Bench, and condemned, and thereupon sent to prison. And what at length could the Bishop have done less ? But it seems the Bishop had in the managery of the matter with this man somewhat overshot himself, and not proceeded so circumspectly in the imprisonment of him for so long time. For Benisons cause being brought before the Lords of the Council, the Bishop was judged to have dealt too hardly with him, and received therefore some reprimand. This made Benison's friends and the Bishop's enemies to triumph. And he, to second his blow, (that I may put all together,) preferred a petition to the Lords, " That it would please " them to inform the Queen, while his affliction was vet " something fresh within her remembrance, that for the " late loss and great hindrance he had sustained by his late " imprisonment, over and beside his former harm done him, " the Queen would take some pity on him, and that in three " regards especially. First, his charges of close imprison- BISHOP AYLMEH. " ment thirty weeks in the Chnk; having a man conti- CHAP. " nually suing to their Honours for him : whose expenses, X1, " besides his ordinary maintenance, were great and charge- " able unto him. And that it might be judged, that nei- " ther he, nor any poor student else, who had been ten- " derly brought up after an honest manner in learning, " could not any way live conveniently in so costly a place " so long time under 40/. cost at least. Secondly, the un- " faithful dealing of sundry men with him, who had most " part of his household-stuff' in their hands when he went " to prison ; and the utter spoil of his books, both at his " chamber, and also in the prison, brought no less damage " unto him than were his costs in the Clink, with much " grief because he could get no such books again, as were " the most of those he missed. Thirdly, his tenement of " freehold, all the stay of living that was left him of his " father, was so ruined, and utterly spoiled in his absence " especially, as an 100/. would not in all things repair it " again, and bring it to the same ableness for her Majesty's " service, that it was in, in his ancestors' days. " Wherefore these things briefly informed by their Ho- " nours, and his present poverty opened unto her, to wit, " that it would please them to tell her, that he was not " then able, unless he would sell his poor apparel off his " back, or cover of his bed, to lay out 40.9. for his recovery " of ought of that which was unjustly taken from him, and " by force kept still. Which if they would do, he would " nothing doubt of it, but that God, who of his mercy to- " ward him made her Majesty to pity him for his long im- " prisonment, and other wrongs received of the Lord Bi- " shop, would now again move her to set down, according " to this Christian clemency he had ingrafted into her, some " good order of recompensing of him for the great wrong " the Bishop had done him." But how well or how ill this petition was taken of the Lords I cannot tell. And so much for Benison. As for the charge, that the Bishop made his porter a ^'^l *, r ,| e Minister; all things considered he thought it to be justifi- hi * P ort ^ cleared. 140 THE LIFE OF CHAP, able and lawfully done, and not to lack example of many such that had been after that sort admitted, both since the Queen's coming to the crown, by many good Bishops, and by sound histories ecclesiastical. That where Churches, by reason of persecution, or multitudes of hamlets and free chapels, had commonly very small stipends for the Min- isters, honest godly men, upon the discretion of the go- vernors of the church, had been, and might be, brought in to serve, in the want of learned men, in prayer, administra- tion of the Sacraments, good example of life, and in some sort of exhortation. And this man therefore, when the Bi- shop found him by good and long experience to be one that feared God, to be conversant in the Scriptures, and of very honest life and conversation, he allowed of him to serve in a small congregation at Paddington ; where commonly, for the meanness of the stipend, no preacher could be had ; as in many places it came to pass, where the parsonage was impropriate, and the provision for the Vicar or Curate very small. And how that poor man behaved himself there, time and trial proved him : for he continued in that place with the good liking of the people eight or nine years, till he grew dull of sight for age, and thereby unable to serve any longer. It is to be found among the Greek Canons, that in Spain and Africa, when the Goths and Vandals had by extreme persecution made havock of the Churchmen, those few that were left there alive made their moan to the Churches of Rome and Italy, that their churches stood empty, because they could get none to serve, no not such as were unlearned. Whereby it appears, that in the time of necessity, and such great want, the Church did allow of very -mean clerks ; and so did they in the beginning of this Queen's reign. other ca- It is hard to relate all the aspersions and stories they cast lumines. U p on tn ; s grave Father. For besides the former, they charged him for cutting down the fair elms of Fulham ; and for taking part with his man, who endeavoured to wrong a poor shepherd of a legacy left him. The false- hood of both which hath been declared before. They rudely BISHOP AYLMER. Ill nicknamed his Lordship (whose Christian name was John) CHAP. Don John, and sometimes, by an easy variation from thence, XI ' Dumb John ; intending thereby to fetch him over for lazi- ness and neglect of preaching. Whereas in truth he was both a great and a learned preacher, and had been very successful therein. In former time he was the only preacher in Leicestershire : whereby, under God, that county was brought out of ignorance to knowledge and sound religion. When afterwards he was Archdeacon of Lincoln, by his diligent preaching and careful discipline, he purged both the cathedral church and the county too, and reduced it to order, sobriety, and religion. Moreover they had the confidence to give out, that simony was the Bishop's lackey, and that, according to Marprelate's phrase, Tarleton had taken him in Don John of London's cellar: that he urged men to subscribe contrary to law : that he abused the High Commission: that he bound an Essex Minister in a bond of 200/. to wear his surplice on Easter-day : that he forbade men to humble themselves in fasting and prayer : and that he then said unto the preachers, Now you had best tell the people that ice forbid fasts. The occasion of this clamour seemed to be, that in Lent 1588, by letters to the Arch- deacon of Essex, he had forbidden certain fasts which the sectaries had of their own authority appointed. Further, they told it abroad with triumph, how one dame Lawson, a citizen's wife, a bold prating woman, came to the Bishop at Paul's gate, and bade him throw himself down at her Majesty's feet, and acknowledge himself to be unsavoury salt, and to crave pardon of her Highness, because he had so long deceived her and her people. This woman, as it seems, was set on by the malecontent party. For she took her opportunity to abuse even the Archbishop of Canter- bury, as well as the Bishop of London. But the apolo- gizer, in the name of the Bishop, replied, that this dame came at no time to him in that bravery. For if she had, the Bishop was not so soft, but she should have felt of his discipline, and of the Queen's authority. They charged him further, that he was a defender of the f h 0 e w £g 0 ' 142 THE LIFE OF CHAP, breach of the Sabbath, and that he used to play at bowls X1 ' on those days. And that he was a swearer, because he used to say sometimes, By my faith. As to these two last im- putations, the Bishop thus either justified or excused him- self ; That he never withdrew himself from service or sermon on the Lord's days. That Christ, the best expositor of the Sabbath, said, that the Sabbath icus made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. That man might have his meat dressed for his health upon the Sabbath ; and why might he not have some convenient exercise of his body for the health thereof on that day ? Indeed it was the general cus- tom in those days, both at Geneva, and in all other places where Protestants inhabited, after the service of the Lord's day was over, to refresh themselves with bowling, walking abroad, or other innocent recreations. And the Bishop fol- lowed that which in his travels abroad he had seen ordina- rily practised among them. As for his using the word, By his faith, sometimes in his asseverations, the Bishop pleaded, that if it were an oath, he would amend it ; but he was ap- prehensive of no more in that phrase of speech, By my faith, than In very truth, Bona fide, Assuredly, or as Amen im- porteth. Beside the book of Martin Marprelate, wherein most of these calumnies are cast upon him, there was another book came forth in these times, written with as much spite against the Bishops, and Aylmer among the rest, entitled, A Dia- logue concerning the Tyrannical Dealings of the Lord Bi- shops. Where the author spake of his making the porter of his gate Minister of Paddington, being blind, when he could do him no further service. But that was known to be false, that honest man losing his sight divers vears after. And in another place, that this Bishop when he was at best was but a corrupt man : and that the best thing in his book [of the Harboroagh of Faitlful Subjects] savoured but of earth, and many things handled in it very immodestly and unchristianly. And, that I may not conceal any thing that his slander- ous enemies belched out against him, the very mention BISHOP AYLMER 14:3 whereof is enough to shew their malice, and to justify the CHAP. Prelate ; there was another imputation cast upon him, both ' of covetousness and falsehood. As that he protested once at Paul's Cross, that he had no money, and that Paul's church could bear him witness, [upon which he had laid out so largely in repairs.] And that shortly after one of his servants robbed him of an 100/. As though these two might not well consist together ; that at the time when he spake those words he might have little or no money, and soon after receive an 100/. and have it in his house. Nor is it an unusual manner of speech for men to sav, thev have no monev, when thev have not plentv of it. The slanderer added, that for this offence of robbing the Bishop, he hung three or four : some of which said, they knew he had money at usury, and that his servants lived upon bribes. The libeller was put hard to it to blemish the Bishop's name, when he was fain to make use of the words of rogues hanged at Tyburn to do it. What credit is to be given to such, let anv one judge. But in the midst of these enemies he had divers friends, His friends, and some of them of power and quality at the Court. The chief of these was the Lord Burghlev, Lord Treasurer of England ; who indeed, as he was a verv good and wise man, so lie was a general patron and friend to all the wor- thy and learned men of the Church. He was this Bishop's great and constant friend ; and he shewed himself never the less friendly, though he used, as he saw occasion, freelv to speak his mind, and admonish him in some things which he thought reprovable. Whereat though the Bishop woidd be sometimes a little nettled, and speak and write to the Lord Treasurer somewhat hastily, vet this never abated that real love the said Lord had for him : which the Bi- shop after long experience being very sensible of, vowed himself unto him, as his chief patron under God and the Queen. And when once, viz. in the year 1585, the said noble Peer had by the Lord North sent a kind message to him, expressing what an opinion and value he had for him ; and particularly that he would endeavour to procure him 144 THE LIFE OF CHAP, more ease by a translation to an easier bishopric, which was XI " the tiling that of all he most desired ; these favours made a great impression upon the Bishop's grateful heart ; which by letter to the said Lord he soon expressed: "That he " understood by the abovesaid Lord North, how much he " was bound to him, as well for his good opinion of him far " above any thing that was in him, as also for his honour- " able purpose to purchase, him some more ease in his old " years, than hitherto it had been his luck to have. That " though he had neither by obsequious attendance, nor bv " any manner of recompense, nor by any great signification " of thankfulness, given his Lordship any cause to deal so " favourably ; yet that it might please him to think of him, " [the Bishop,] who, he said, was no good courtier, as one " that could better conceive what and how much he was " bound unto so honourable a friend, than his plain nature " by outward shew did commonly vaunt. But that his " Lordship should find, by God's grace in the end, when " ability served, that he would neither forget his obtain- " ing the archdeaconry of Lincoln for him, nor his honour- " able countenance for him since he came to that restless " sea, [he meant the bishopric,] nor the constant conti- " nuance of his favour and furtherance towards him in his " long lingering hope of remove." But there was a party at Court against him, that ever obstructed this from taking effect, in how great probability soever it was sometimes of succeeding. He called it his burthenous estate in that place, wherein he found himself every day more and more unapt to supply what the place and the time required. But he prayed that God's will might be done, who in mercy in his good time would provide a place for him of more ease, [meaning heaven,] and a man for that room of more ability. And thus in the conclusion composing himself as to this matter, " that though some men sought to hinder the course that " the Lord Treasurer and other of his honourable friends " so favourably followed, yet in the end they should do no " more than God would suffer 1116111." BISHOP AYLMER 145 Between the foresaid noble Lord and him was held a con- C II A P. stant good correspondence. For indeed he was a person that XI ' took a particular care of the Church, and the state of reli- Lord Trea - gion; and was, as I may so say, the superintendent of theuurghiey. superintendents of it. And the Bishop, seeing how he was concerned, not only for the civil state, but the ecclesiastic also, told him once, that he, the said Lord, might justly say, not only rcipublicce, but, with St. Paul, Mild incumbit cura omnium Ecclesiarum. In truth he was one, that, by his ex- traordinary natural parts, and deep and long experience, had arrived to such a degree of wisdom and understanding, that when once the Bishop had signified his advice in some matter, he shortly took up himself with the Latin proverb, Sed sus Minervam, and said no more. And well know- ing the great stay this said Lord was to the whole kingdom, at another time he made this prayer for him ; " I pray for " you as God's good and great instrument in this poor ark " of Noah, and these most dangerous times. In which I " pray God send you the eyes of angels, and the wisdom " of Solomon." CHAP. XII. His great abilities in learning. His disputations : writ- ings. A Logician : set the two sorts of Rehoboam's counsellors before those to Elizabeth, whom he made his discourse. The grave and the ancient senators, those Queen Elizabeth chose: but the rash younger sort, those Queen Mary chose. " These, 1 ' as he described them, " advised that King not to spare, but to lay about " him, to chop off their heads, to tower them, hang them, " burn them, away with them : Dead men do no harm : " and to make his little finger heavier upon his people than " was his father's body. These were lusty lads, these were " such as would win all or lose all." Thus Aylmer, under the colour of Rehoboam's rash counsellors, made a lively representation of Queen Mary's. But her sister Queen shewed her wisdom in making another choice. For she, said he, picked out such counsellors to serve her as were neither of common wit nor common experience. Of whom some by travel in strange countries, some by learning, some by practice and like authority in other rulers' days, some by affliction either one way or other, for their gifts and graces, which they had received at God's hand, were men meet to be called to such rooms. He added, (to take off an objection,) that if she could, she would have chose her Council wholly of the nobility, she being her- self the head of that order and patroness ; but if she espied out meaner men of greater experience, further reach, and more science than they were, there was no fear but the nobles, both for their own safety and the Queen's, would gladly lot to themselves such as might put them in mind of things they remembered not. By which words, I make no doubt, he had his eye upon Bacon and Cecil, whom, though not noble by birth, the Queen had taken into her Council. His judg- His iudgment of the Queen's marriage, (which solicitouslv ment of the .• ' & , , i , ° , • • ^ , ' Queen's exercised all men s thoughts and cares at this time,) whe- roamage. tner better to marr y to some within her own kingdom, or some foreign Prince, he thus expressed ; "That if all things " answered, it was better joining at home than choosing BISHOP AYLMEB. 179 " abroad : as if he be no very base or mean person ; if lie c H A P. " love and fear God ; if he be of the same religion, endued " with good and commendable qualities of wisdom, justice, " manhood, temperance, gifts of languages, knowledge of " countries, pitiful, merciful, constant, sober, no hearer of " flatterers, continent, not prodigal, but liberal, no extorter, " &c. such an one, if God should allot any Queen, were to " be preferred to any abroad. Unless all these, vi he said, " might be found in a stranger: and thereto joined nobility, " and ancientness of lineage, and the nation being such as " used not to rule cruelly, but rather fatherly than lordly." We easily perceive what foreign Prince he excluded by those words, namely, proud King Philip ; who had already made his addresses to the Queen : and she most discreetly had declined him. His judgment of the French he shewed in these words; His judg- " That they were the proudest, the untruest, and the most French. " tyrannical nation under the sun. I except not, 11 said he, " the Spaniards : whose dominion the Italians in Milan, " Naples, Sicily, and elsewhere, can much better brook and " abide, than the light and inconstant French, as Caesar " called them. 11 Of the Spaniard, another powerful neighbour of England, Of the these were his thoughts with respect to Queen Elizabeth's Spamard ' late denial of him. " If kings be wooers and no speeders, " there can be small hopes that they will be faithful friends " after : for great men cannot bear great repulses ; espe- " cially when their power is such as they can, when they " will, revenge it. A mind or heart, 11 added he, "where love " hath dwelt, if it begin once to hate, is like a sponge, " which sucketh up as much water of malice, as it had " before honey. 11 A man's wisdom and judgment, and a great deal of his His prover- mind and sentiments, become known by his ordinary speeches b,alsa >' in £ s - and expressions. And for this purpose I shall rehearse here divers of our Bishop's proverbial sayings and apo- phthegms. n 2 180 THE LIFE OF CHAP. "If thou hast the forecast of a wise man, thou wilt be X1IJ " " content with a little, to purchase the safety of the whole." " Be not covetous where thou shouldest be liberal, nor " unkind where thou shouldest be thankful, nor wayward " where thou shouldest be forward.'''' " Take to thee the stomach of a free palfrey, and not the " froward touches of a resty jade." " As it is God's peculiar property never to err, so it is a " botch in man's nature seldom to hit the truth.'" " Sometimes under a homely coat lieth much treasure, " and pure gold is found among much dross." True frater- « it i s manners, faith, and behaviour, and not nations, y " that make men strangers. And contrariwise, where there " is one faith, one baptism, and one Christ, there is nar- " rower fraternity than if they came out of one womb." A saying proper to cheer him in his exile condition. " As an eye full of tears is the more unable to see, so the " mind full of sorrow is the less able to judge." " You must bring our own weights to weigh our matters " by, and not strangers 1 , or else we must take you for an ill " clerk of the market." " Good example is ofttimes much better than a great " deal of preaching." The benefit " If I had but ten Nestors, said Agamemnon, Troy lors. * " could not stand long :" speaking of some wise counsellors the Queen had chose about her. Speaking against covetous men, " Your gold and your " angels are called current, and not sleepant." Women's Speaking of the pride of women, and of their excess, pnde ' when the nation wanted necessary defence, he thus accosted them : " Oh ! ye English ladies, learn rather to wear Ro- " man hearts, than Spanish knacks ; rather to help your " country, than hinder your husbands; to make your Queen " rich for your defence, than your husbands poor for your " gearish gayness. If every one of you would employ your " rings and chains, or the price of your superfluous ruffs, " furs, fringes, and such other trinkets, upon the necessary BISHOP AVLMER. 181 " defence of your country, I think you should make the CHAP. " Queen much richer, and abler to meet with your enemies, xnI " " and yourselves much the honester." The Popish Clergy he called " spiritual spiders." And The Popish Bonner, the fat, cruel Bishop of London, he called « My Clergy ' " Lord Lubber of London." The Bible he called " a Paradise, wherein are to be found Tlie Bible. " all the best herbs and fruits that b?." " A good purpose overthrown by the might of mam- " mon." " No man's judgment is so sound, no man's wit so ripe, No infclli- " nor his learning so perfect, but he may sometime miss the bU ' ty- " quission." " As a man that would buy a house, will not so much " weigh the gay painting as the sure building ; so who " will judge of any matter truly, must lay it before his eyes " nakedly." " Miracles are not the work, but the impediment of na- Miracles. " ture." " The breach of good laws is the breakneck of the " country." Speaking of some ignorant persons that yet will talk and prate, he said, " They were like a certain Sir John, which " said, By my priesthood, if the Trinity were not in my " poi-tas, I would not believe it." He compared a false argument, cunningly set out with A false ar- words, " to a well kembed bush, where never a hah- lay s ument - " amiss, so long as the man had a house to cover him: but " when he comes into the wind, it is soon ruffled. Or like " a painted madam's face, which, so long as nobody blows " upon it, nor sweat riseth in it, is gay glistering : but any " of these means maketh the wrinkles soon appear. So is a " false argument decked with fair words : it seemeth good, " but turn it naked, and you shall soon see the botches." He made women to be of two sorts, " some of them Women. " wiser, better learned, discreeter, and more constant than a " number of men." But another and a worse sort of them, and the most part, he thus facetiously, but sharply de- n3 182 THE LIFE OF CHAP. XIII. Neglect of good coun- sel. Acqui- escence in God. scribed ; " Fond, foolish, wanton, flibbergibbs, tattlers, . " triflers, wavering, witless, without counsel, feeble, careless, " rash, proud, dainty, nice, tale-bearers, eves-droppers, ru- " mour-raisers, evil-tongued, worse-minded, and in every " wise doltified with the dregs of the Devil's dunghill." Shewing how misery and unsuccessfulness happened to Xerxes, that powerful and mighty emperor, for neglecting the good counsel of Artimisia in Herodotus, having lost his vast army, "He went home," said he, " not like a king, but " like a coxcomb : not like a conqueror, but like a coward : " not like a man, but like a mouse, in a fisher-boat with one " or two with him ; though he brought out so many [sol- " diers] with him, as it is almost in these days incredible." " The safest way is to let him do his will which can do " best ; and which can see plainly what will follow, where " we blindly guess, and do but grope at it:" spoken in reference to our acquiescence in the providence of God. CHAP. XIV. His qualities, conditions, and temper of mind. "dd^o" "W" E nave not y et said tnat i s sufficient to describe the sition. character of this reverend Father : for we have not all this while looked into his nature, temper, disposition, and the inward tendencies of his mind. Zealous for And first, for his sense of God and religion, and dis- l'gio 1 ™ 6 charge °f his duty. He was deeply and heartily concenied for the true religion in opposition to Popery ; and from the beginning was a hearty embracer of the reformed religion, and an earnest Protestant : he was deeplv sensible of the wonderful goodness of God, in detecting and delivering us from the gross errors of Popery. This was once his con- His opinion templation concerning Luther : " When the light of the " Gospel was put out, and Antichrist ruled and revelled in " the temple of God, (which is men's hearts and con- BISHOP AYLMER. 188 " sciences,) armed and guarded with the power of emperors, CHAP. " kings, princes, and laws, beyond all men's expectations, X1V ' " contrary to hope, a poor Friar, one man, at that time not " the best learned, through the mighty hand of God, ac- " cording to his unsearchable decree, was able, not with " force and armour, not with bands of men and power, not " with favour of princes and prelates, not with any help " of man or favour of the world, to set up the cross of " Christ, to pull down the chair of Antichrist, to restore " God's word, to banish the Devil's sophistry, to make of " darkness light, of lies truth, of plain foolishness true wis- " dom ; and as it were another Helena, to find out the " cross of Christ hidden in the dunghill of devilish doc- " trine, covered with the rotten bones of Romish martyrs, " sinful saints, and counterfeit confessors." And when about the year 1577 great fears were in all His prayer men's hearts from the joint conspiracies of Popish Princes minister* abroad, and the Scotch Queen's accomplices at home, against the peace and quiet of England, the Bishop knowing what a great minister of state the Lord Treasurer was, and what a chief hand he had in the counsels and government, fell to his prayers, and most earnestly beseeched God to give that great Counsellor " the eyes of angels and the wisdom of " Solomon ;" styling him " God's great and good instru- " ment in this poor ark of Noah in these dangerous times." And concerning Henry the French King, a deadly op- His zeal pressor of his poor Protestant subjects, who had also joined French ^ in league with the Turk, Christ's sworn enemy, (by means King.aper- of which league the Turk fell upon some Christian king- doms,) he zealously brake out into these words : " He, a " King or a Devil, a Christian or a Lucifer, that by his " cursed confederacy so encourageth the Turk, that he now " dares be bold to venture upon Polonia, a Christian realm, " which hath received the Gospel, and that way to come " into Germany. Oh ! wicked caitiff, and firebrand of " hell, [pardon, reader, this language to his zeal,] which, " for the increasing of the pomp and vain-glory which he " shall not long enjoy, [mark that,] will betray Christ and n 4 184 THE LIFE OF CHAP. " his cross to his mortal enemy. Oh ! foolish Germans, ' " which see not their own undoing, [which Germans were " his soldiers, or favoured him,] who conspire not together " with the rest of Christian Princes, to pull such a traitor " to God and his kingdom by the ears out of France, and " hang him against the sun a drying, &c. God cannot long " suffer this, though he wink a while at his wretchedness." One would think our Divine spake these words by a pro- phetic spirit, when we consider the event. For it was not much above a quarter of a year after that this King indeed died, viz. July 10, 1559, and that in the flower of his age, being forty-two years old ; and, which is more remarkable, not by a common death, but God made a new thing : and he was thrust into the eye by a lance, notwithstanding his head-piece, in tilting with one of his nobles, that he com- manded to run with him, though earnestly declining it. Whereby his head festered, and he died in miserable pain and anguish. Diligent In the discharge of his duty, the Bishop was very con- and painful, g^g,,^^ an( j exac t ? anc i S p are( J f or no pains, being natu- rally an active and stirring man : and so he was particularly in his episcopal function. One part of his diligence con- sisted in pressing a due conformity unto the laws and orders of the Church established : and that because he thought it the best bulwark to secure from Popery. This was the cause he spared neither Papist nor Puritan. Whereby he drew upon himself the hatred of both : but especially that of the Puritan appeared most visibly against him ; setting Martin Marprelate loose upon him, and giving him all the trouble they could any other way, as we have seen in part in the foregoing history. Not to be Nor was he a man to be biassed by any temptation, or bribe!' id by blinded 'by gifts. An instance of this happened in the year 1581; when a certain prisoner, (some Papist, as it seems,) sent a letter to him, wherein was some signification of a liberal gratification offered for his favour, perhaps to pro- cure him liberty some clancular way : or whether it were a contrivance to betray him into some unwarrantable action, BISHOP AYLMER. 185 and a plot laid for him to bring him into trouble, I know CHAP, not. But the Bishop shewed himself above these tempta- XIV- tions of money, and took the letter and enclosed it in one of his, and sent it to the Lord Treasurer, telling him that the meaning he understood not, but that the writer would angle for him with a golden hook : that he knew his Lordship's •wisdom could smell out the meaning of such matters better than he, and therefore thought good to make his Lordship privy to it : and then to proceed as he should direct him : adding, that he could not think that any of that religion could have any good meaning towards him. He and his whole family every day in the week twice His devo- were present at, and joined with the whole divine service ; tlon ' calling upon God for a blessing upon themselves, the State, and the Queen's Majesty : and by that means putting up frequent devout prayers for her and her kingdoms. He duly observed his triennial visitations. And because Punctual in his presence might be of advantage to the promoting of so- ti 'o n \' 5lta " briety in manners, and obedience to the ecclesiastical constitu- tion, he would often make some longer stay in several places of his diocese, where conveniently he might ; and that for a month or two, before his return home : as to see abuses rec- tified, to hear complaints, to give his counsel and advice to such as needed it, to observe the behaviours of the Clergy, to preach himself, to keep hospitality, and such like. In his ordination of Ministers he was very punctual and An their names. John Payne. Melancthon Jewel. The place where the Commission sat, when Cartwright was brought before them, was the Bishop's chamber. Where he was secretly called on Saturday afternoon, without any warning aforehand, to prevent, as was said, the cumbrance that the coming in of such as favoured him might occasion. And for the satisfaction of any who might be desirous to understand how these proceedings went, I will set down the remainder of the conference of the Bishop and the other Commissioners with Cartwright at this meeting, as I have it from an authentic paper. 206 ADDITIONS. The con- The Bishop having delivered himself, according as was tween the shewn in the history, Cartwright began to speak, but Mr. with°othe Attorney John Popham, another of the Commissioners, Commis- took the speech from him, and made a long discourse. The Cartwright 1 e ^ ect - whereof was to shew, how dangerous a thing it was, Mr. Attoi- that men should, upon the conceits of their own heads, and to him' eeCh y et unc ^ er c °l° ur of conscience, refuse the things that have been received for laws of long time. And that the oath [to answer to certain interrogatories] that was tendered was ac- cording to the laws of the land ; which he commended above the laws of all other lands : yet so, that because they were the laws of men, they carried always some stain of imper- fection. Also, that he was now to deal with Mr. Cartwright in two points : one was, the peace of the land, which was broken by him and others, through unlawful meetings, and making of laws : the other was, the justice of the land, which he and others had offended against, in refusing the oath now tendered : which, as he said, was used in other courts of the land. Neither was there any, in his conscience, learned in the laws, that did judge it unlawful. So exhort- ing Mr. Cartwright to take the oath, the rather for that he being aged should have more experience, and with it more wisdom than the others, he made an end of his speech. The Bishop After this, the Bishop requiring Mr. Cartwright to take puts him t j le oat j, ] le desired that ere he came to the oath, he might upon taking ' 7 ° the oath; be received to answer the grievous charges which were (iechnes'. e given partly against him apart, and partly against him with others, by Mr. Attorney ; but especially by his Lordship. Whereunto the Bishop answered, that he should not answer to any thing but oidy to the oath, whether he would take it, to answer the Articles which he had seen. And Mr. Cartwright replying, that it was a hard course to give open charges, and the same very grievous, and yet to shut men from all answer of them. The Bishop willed him, first to answer touching the oath ; and then he should be admitted His answer to answer the charges which had been made upon him. Mr. ticieT Af Cartwright following the order the Bishop had appointed him, answered, that the Articles being the same that tbey ADDITIONS. 207 upon oath would examine him of, which he had seen hefore, he had already made answer to them, drawing them forth out of his bosom ; and withal offered to be sworn unto it ; and that he coidd not make any further answer. Whereof when they demanded the reason, his answer was, that lie had laid the chief strength of his refusal upon the law of God ; secondly, upon the laws of the land : which in some men's judgment, professing the skill of the laws, did not warrant such proceeding. But seeing that he heard Mr. Attorney affirm as he did, and that he had no eyes to look into the depth and mysteries of the law, he would most principally rely, and stand at this present, upon the law of God. Then Dr. Lewin spake, and said, that he would be glad Dr. Lewin's that Mr. Cartwright should understand, that he was greatly ^m. Ch t0 deceived in that he called this oath the oath cx officio ; The oath ex whereas it was by express words derived from the authority "ff""- of the Prince by a delegate power unto them. Wherefore that he had need to take heed, lest in refusal of this oath he refused that which the Prince authorized. Which speech the Bishop greatly commended ; and willing Mr. Cartwright to take heed unto it, lest by refusal of this oath he should directlv oppose himself to the authority of the Prince : Mr. Cartwright answered first, that in calling it an oath ex officio, he did it by warrant of this court, using no other language therein than the Bishop himself, that so called it, and another of the High Commission that was not then present, who called it the oath of inquisition. The Bishop denied that he had done so. But Mr. Cartwright appeal- ing therein to the testimony of those which were present, he was silent. Secondly, Mr. Cartwright alleged, that he had seen commissions from her Majesty, wherein there was no mention of proceeding by corporal oath. Then Dr. Bancroft interrupting him, Mr. Cartwright desired that he might make an end of his answer. But Dr. Bancroft say- ing, that Mr. Cartwright might speak if he would, and that himself would keep silence ; Mr. Cartwright answered, that he would give him place, and proceed after with his answer, if he remembered it. So Dr. Bancroft said, that the High Bancroft's ° speech to him. 208 ADDITIONS. Commission had been altered, as occasion of time, persons, and other circumstances required. And that it was true indeed that the former Commissions had not inserted into them the clause of proceeding by oath : but that there were some men, discontented with the State, had sought curiously into these things, and observed them. And that Mr. Cart- wright had taken them from them. Some de- Hereupon there fell some jar betwixt the Bishop and between' the Dr - Bancroft ; the Bishop affirming that he liked not that Bishop and saying of the Doctor, and the Doctor making it good, and croft. not afraid to profess it. But the Bishop said, that he had been Commissioner this thirty years, partly in Lincoln, and partly in London, and had always that clause of the oath inserted. His fear being, as it seemed, lest they [the Com- missioners] having used the oath always, and having no Commission, [warranting it,] but now of late, should be thought to be in the prcemunire, for that they had used it so many years without warrant. Cart- Then Mr. Cartwright said, that he had a hard point re- argument maining °f his answer to Dr. Lewin and the Bishop : which against this was, that although they might, by words of her Majesty's oath. Commission, proceed by oath, yet it followed not, that there- fore they might proceed by oath without any to accuse, without any limitation, and without reasonable time of de- liberation and advice what to answer. And therefore he which refuseth not simply to swear, but to swear in such sort as they required, was not, as is said, directly opposite herein to the Queen's authority. Hereof there was some debating concerning the difference of this oath from the oaths tendered in other courts; Mr. Cartwright alleging, that although in other courts the words of the oath were general, yet that indeed it was restrained to some particular matter, which the deponent knew before he took the oath. And that himself, in title of hospital lands, [wis:, the hospi- tal in Warwick, where he was Master,] before certain Com- missioners, had taken the oath which is accustomably given in other courts. After, Mr. Dr. Bancroft charged him, that he had taken ADDITIONS. 209 this oath twenty years ago ; asking, why it was not as law- Cart- ful now as at that time. Whereunto he answered, that the repifesV case was not alike ; for that then there was but one only J*^? 1 w , as matter for him to be examined of, and the same was known ) ia d once unto him before : also, that he had not so spent his time, the (he thanked God,) but that in so long a space he had learned something, as in some other things, so in this. (He that wrote this relation said, he heard Mr. Cartwright say afterwards, that, had he not been interrupted, he could fur- ther have answered, that he took not that oath twenty years ago, but with exception to answer so far as might well stand with God's glory and the good of his neighbour.) Finally, that by the example of divers Ministers and others refusing this oath before him, he took occasion to search further than otherwise he was like to have done. Then Dr. Bancroft said, that for so much as every man And that which had offended another was bound to confess his fault, boimdto and to reconcile himself, he should much more do it to the confess our Prince. Whereunto Mr. Cartwright answering, that the case here was very unlike, and that this general rule did admit some exception ; which seeming strange to Dr. Ban- croft, he required of Mr. Cartwright an instance : who an- swered, that if he had spoken evil to one of a third man, which never came to the knowledge of it, it should not stand well with the rule of charity to open this matter unto the person whom he had wronged ; considering that so he might (likely) break the knots of love, which without that confes- sion might have continued whole. Moreover, upon the charge which Mr. Attorney repeated, And that he that Mr. Cartwright and others had holden conferences and heidaln-™ made laws ; Mr. Cartwright answered, that touching that ferencea point his answer was before them, which, being required, i aws . he would confirm upon his oath ; that is, that they never held conferences by any authority, nor ever made any laws by any manner of compulsion, to procure any obedience unto them. Also, that he and others had expressly testified by subscription, that they would not so much as voluntarily and by mutual agreement, one of them without another, p 210 ADDITIONS. practise any advice or agreement that was contrary to any law in the land. Whereunto Mr. Dr. Bancroft replied, that authority they had none, and therefore could not use it; and compulsion needed not, seeing every one, received to their conferences, must subscribe to be obedient to all orders he and others should set down ; so far as if they should set down the sense or interpretation of a place of Scripture, it should not be lawful for any to depart from that ; which, said he, is deposed by three or four. But, said Mr. Cart- wright, he might have ecclesiastical jurisdiction of reproof, suspension, excommunication, degradation, as they had been openly, but most untruly, charged to have done, if either, or others with him, had thought it lawful for them so to do. And for the other point, of their requiring subscription by any that was admitted, much less such a subscription as Mr. Dr. Bancroft spake of, he protested that neither had he so done, nor any that he knew : and that he was ready to make that also good upon his oath. And when Further, Dr. Lewin moved Mr. Cartwright to take the mored oath, and then assured himself that the company would again to take at his hands any reasonable answer. To whom Mr. oath. Cartwright answered, that he could not conveniently give any other answer than that which was before them. To whom when the Bishop replied, that then they would tell him where his answer was short, and required further an- swer : so, said Mr. Cartwright, shall not the oath make an end of the controversy ; which notwithstanding is the proper use of an oath. Against which Mr. Dr. Bancroft excepted, saying, that an oath tended indeed to make an end of a controversy; but that it was strange that Mr. Cartwright said, that it should wholly end a controversy ; albeit Mr. Cart- wright therein alleged no interpretation, but the plain text Bancroft But, (said Mr. Dr. Bancroft,) Mr. Cartwright, think you dangeVof thus to go away in the clouds, or to have to deal with men piine ' SCi °^ SO sma ^ j U( *g ment > as not to see wnat i s y our drift ? Do not we know from whom you draw your discipline and Church-government? Do not we know their judgments and their practice ? which is to bring in the further reformation ADDITIONS. 211 against the Prince's will by force and arms. It is well He meant known, how one of the English Church at Geneva wrote a Goodman" book to move to take arms against Queen Mary ; and Mr. Whittingham's Preface before it. And who knoweth not, that the Church of Geneva allowed it ? Also we have seen The disci- the practice in France. Likewise it is written in the Scot- France" tish story, how Mr. Knox moved the nobility of Scotland Scotland, to bring in the Gospel with force against the Queen there ; V a. and likewise well known, that Mr. Calvin was banished Geneva, for that he would have brought in the discipline against the will of the magistrate. Whereunto Mr. Cart- Cart- wright replied, that his meaning was not to hide himself in „pf y h to the clouds touching this matter, as one which had made a tnis - plain and direct denial hereof : wherein if any thing were doubtful, he would make it as plain as Mr. Doctor could set it down. But that he now perceived, that if others were like-minded to Mr. Dr. Bancroft, all purgation of ourselves by oath (which was now required of him and others) should be in vain ; considering, that whatsoever they should de- pose, yet it might be answered, as Mr. Doctor doth, that they knew our drift well enough. Moreover, that he did the reformed Churches great injury, which never had either that judgment or practice he speaketh of, for any thing that he ever read or knew. That he had read the Scottish story, but remembered not that which he spake of. That some particular persons had written from Geneva some such things as he spake of; yet that it was a hard judg- ment to charge the Church of Geneva wiih it : which by an epistle set forth by Mr. Beza, a principal Minister thereof, had utterly disclaimed that judgment. With this the Bishop took them up, and asked Mr. Cart- The Bishop wright once again, whether he would take the oath ; and ™ * k *f £"rt- upon his refusal, commanded an act thereof to be entered, wight's re- Then Mr. Cartwright putting the Bishop in mind of his promise of leave to answer the charges which were given against him, he answered, that he had no leisure to hear his answer : and if he would answer, he should do it by a private letter to the Bishop. p 2 212 ADDITIONS. The Arti- cles charged fellows. had r?a U di"s ° ne thin S beside Mr> Dr Bancroft undertook to affirm answers, there; that her Majesty had read Mr. Cartwright's answer to the Articles : which although it were abruptly brought in, yet it was esteemed that his meaning was thereby to sig- nify, that her Majesty, notwithstanding the knowledge of that answer, would have this severe proceeding against him. And this was the sum of what was done at that sitting. But since we have not yet seen fully what the crimes were that Cartwright and his fellows were accused of, I shall add here the effect of the principal matters in the bill of complaint against them ; viz. " That there had been of late set forth by some seditious against " people, a government of the Church by Doctors, Pastors, andTs 5 " " Elders > Deacons, and such like. " With a new form of Common Prayer and Administra- " tion of the Sacraments, and discipline for the Church, " comprised in a book entitled, Disciplina Ecclesice Sacra, " Dei verbo descripta : and other books and pamphlets of " like nature. " That the defendants had unlawfully and seditiously " assembled themselves together concerning the premises. " And had in those [assemblies] treated of, and con- " eluded upon, sundry seditious Articles, in allowance of " the same books, and of the matters therein contained. " Unto which Articles the defendants had in some of " those assemblies submitted themselves and subscribed, " and put part thereof in execution. For which misde- " meanors they had been called in question before the High " Commissioners: where they refused to take the oath " ministered to them, to answer to such Articles as they " were to be examined of on her Majesty's behalf concern- " ing the same. " Of all which a bill had been exhibited by direction " from the Lords into the Star-chamber against the defend- " ants. In which bill was also contained, that they, under " colour and pretence of discipline and charity, did derive " to themselves power to deal in all manner of causes what- " soever ; and had moved and persuaded sundry her Ma- ADDITIONS. 213 " jesty's subjects, to refuse to take any oath to answer to " any matter that might concern any the unlawful doings " and proceedings of them, their brethren, and teachers." Lastly, I will subjoin the process of this business, with Thc P r °- i/» • , t,i i-ii t ceedings the interrogatories, and how matters stood with them J une w ith them. 23, 1591. To the former bill the defendants in their answer have How the confessed their denial to take the oath before the Commis- ^'puritans sioners ; and for the rest of the most material matters have stood, made an uncertain and insufficient answer. Which being referred by the Court to the consideration of the Chief Justices, Chief Baron and Mr. J ustice Gawdy, they advising thereof, did set down wherein their answers were insufficient, and that they ought to answer the same particularly and directly. This notwithstanding, they made their answer in effect in many points as imperfect as before; and in some points oppose themselves against the report of the Judges, that they ought not to answer them. Whereupon interrogatories were ministered unto them upon the parts of the bill. Whereof they answer not at all the most part, and the principal interrogatories. Hereupon, the consideration thereof being by the court eftsoons committed to the said Judges; and they to set down wherein and which of the interrogatories ought to be better answered, and that the same should be answered ac- cordingly. The defendants being thereupon eftsoons examined upon interroga- these interrogatories according to the direction, do notwith- put t0 standing still refuse to answer them. As namely these : " Where the said assemblies were made ; when, and how " often. " Who were at the same assemblies as well as themselves. " What matters were treated of in the same assem- blies. " Who made or set forth, corrected or reformed, the said " book of discipline, or any part thereof. " Who subscribed, or submitted themselves to the same p 3 214 ADDITIONS. " book, or to the Articles therein concluded, besides the " said defendants. " Whether in a Christian monarchy the King is to be " accounted among the governors of the Church, or amongst " those which are to be governed by Pastors, Doctors, or " such like. " Whether in a well-ordered Church it is lawful for the " Sovereign Prince to ordain orders and ceremonies apper- " taining to the Church. " Whether ecclesiastical government, established by her " Majesty's authority within the Church of England, be " lawful, or allowed by the word of God. " Whether the Sacraments ministered within her Ma- " jesty's dominions, as they be ordained by the Book of " Common Prayer to be ministered, be godly and rightly " ministered." Numb. VI. Pag. 113. Upon the THE Bishop being now four days deceased, the Dean and death P the Chapter of St. Paul's claimed a privilege upon his death, Dean and and during the vacation of his bishopric ; which was, to dainfthe en j°y tne temporalties of the bishopric, paying yearly 100Z. temporal- for the same : and that by an old charter, given to the Cor- poration by King Edward II. And so made their suit to the Lord Treasurer Burghley; who accordingly ordered Fanshaw, an officer in the Exchequer, to examine the char- ter, and how it had been allowed formerly : which he did, and found it to be of the same effect. And that in King Henry VIII.'s time, upon the translation of Cuthbert ann. Reg. 25. the bishopric being vacant, the Dean and Chapter had the custody of the bishopric and temporalties. And when Stokesley succeeded in that see, the King granted to him all the right and title that he had in the temporalties and rent thereof, which before was had and taken by the Dean and Chapter, and did discharge the Dean and Chapter. The Treasurer being satisfied with this charter and this late precedent, I find that after some time they had the ADDITIONS. 215 temporaries let and consigned to them by the Queen, upon the consideration of 1000/. a year; (computing the 100/. in Edward II.'s time worth 1000/. now.) And afterwards, upon the admission of Richard Fletcher to be Bishop^ the Treasurer demanded an account of the Dean and Chapter of their receipts of money and rent ; which they sent him in ; that is, from June 5, 1594, to January 24 ensuing : in their paper calling themselves custocles episcopatus ac om- The De »n nium temporalium ejusdem, quamdiu idem episcopatus va- mstoc/T/ 1 " cavit. And it was computed that they were to pay, accord- viscopatus. ing to their account, (after the rate of 1000/. per ann.) for the temporalties, for the time they held them, 320/. 11$. And the Queen wrote her letters to them to restore the al- location thereof to the reverend Father Richard Fletcher ; whom she had nominated for Bishop. Numb. VII. Pag. 127. MANY persons of note of the Aylmers in England had The Ayi- been there spoke of : but as the name had flourished here i re iand. at home, so it spread itself considerably in the neighbouring kingdom of Ireland ; where the Aylmers were settled time out of mind. Their first coming thither is uncertain ; pro- bably two hundred years ago, and more. The first we meet with of that stock there, was Richard, (a great name in the family,) being the ancientest person taken notice of in a visitation book (remaining in the library of the college near Dublin) of Molineux, sometime Ulster King of Arms of Ireland : which Richard perhaps was the son of that Richard of Norwich, who had been Mayor of that city; and is said in his monumental inscription to be procerum de Vid. p. \ts. stipite natus. The abovesaid Richard married Katherine, daughter of Petit, of Piersetown in the county of Meath. Whose son and heir married Margaret, daughter of Bar- tholomew Bath, of Dullardstown in the county of Meath, Esquire. By whom he had Bartholomew Aylmer, of Lyons in Kildare. Who married to Margaret, daughter of Chevers p 4 216 ADDITIONS. of Maston in the county of Meath, Esquire. And had two sons, Sir Garret of Dullardstown, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas anno 1535. and married Alson, daughter of Fitz Garald of Athlone. His other son (who was the elder) was named Richard ; married to Jenet, daughter of Twee, Alderman of Dublin. And from these two brothers the family branched out numerously into the Aylmers of the Lyons and of Dullardstown : and intermarried into the best houses in the counties of Meath and Kildare. As the last named Richard had Richard, that married Eleoner, daughter of James Lord Slane. Their son Thomas mar- ried Alson, daughter of Thomas Cusack, Knight, Lord Chancellor of Ireland anno 1550. who had issue, Bar- tholomew married to Cicely, daughter of Robert Pipho, and Jenet, daughter of Viscount Gormanston. Their son was Thomas, that took to wife Mabil, daughter of Peter Barnwel, Knight. The other brother, Sir Garret, or Gereld, that was Chief Justice, (as is abovesaid,) had Bartholomew, and he James, and James Nicolas, and he Christopher, and Christopher Richard; who married the daughter of Sir Robert Dillon, Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, and died anno 1635. He left (besides other sons and daughters) James, that matched to Johanna, daughter of Christopher Lord Killeen. From the other house, viz. of the Lyons, came Christo- pher, a sober, wise, and studious man ; who, living in the times of the civil wars, shewed his loyalty to King Charles L by giving him his assistance, and afterwards by suffering exile for him in Spain. This Christopher married a daughter of Matthew Plunket, Lord of Lowth : whose issue was Sir Gerald, the eldest, and Matthew, now living, appointed Admiral to the royal fleet sent into the Straits : where he did faithful service to his great honour and reputation : now Governor of Deal castle, and one of the Barons in Parliament for the Cinque Port of Dover : the inhabitants of which place hold themselves much obliged to him for procuring the late act for the repairing of Dover pier, a matter of such importance to the whole nation. ADDITIONS. 217 In short, this family of the Aylmers of Ireland is related to the noblest and best houses in the counties of Meath, Dublin, and Kildare; as the Lutterels, the Fitz-Geralds, the Fitz-Moris, Cusacks, Dillons, Fitz-Simons, Piphos, Chi- vers, Plunkets, Flemmings, Husseys, and others. And Camden, reckoning up the best families of English extrac- in his Bri- tion in Meath, specifies the Fitz-Geralds, the Ougans, tanma " De la Hides, Walshes, Boisels, Whites, Suttons, and among the rest the Aylmers. Numb. VIII. Pag. 130. THAT unequal marriage, for the solemnizing whereof a The stolen licence was obtained out of the Bishop's Faculty Office, was ™* Lady mentioned to have been complained of at Court, and occa- Dorothy sioned blame to the Bishop. The particulars of it, omitted with sir in the history, were as follow. The parties were Sir™ 0 ™* 5 Thomas Parrot and the Lady Dorothy Devereux, daughter to the Earl of Essex, of right noble and ancient blood : which lady at that time lived with Sir Henry Cock, Kt. in the parish of Broxburn in Hertfordshire : where, getting into the parish church, they were married by a strange Minister, whom they had procured, two men guarding the church door with their swords and daggers under their cloaks, as the rest of the company had, to the number of five or six. One Green was then Vicar of the parish, to whom that morning repaired two persons. One of them told him that he was a Minister, and a Bachelor of Divi- nity, and had been a Preacher of long time ; and asked him for the key of the church door, which must be opened to him, for he had a commission, whereupon he was to examine certain men, and to swear them : and therefore asked him also for the Communion Book. The Vicar told him it was locked up in the vestry, and he could not come by it : but instead thereof he offered him a Latin Testament. But the other said, that would not serve his turn. Coming to the church he found it open, and Sir Thomas and the lady ready to 218 ADDITIONS. enter in ; who hindered him by any means from shutting it. But perceiving that they meant to proceed to a mar- riage, he persuaded the strange Minister not to deal herein, wondering how he would intrude himself into his [the Vi- car's] charge ; and then offered to him an injunction against it, and began to read it unto them ; which was to this tenor : An mjunc- u n em Yox the avoiding: of inconvenience which some- tion about . ° licences to " times groweth by licences to marry without the banns marry. (( ( w hich notwithstanding are sometimes reasonably " granted,) no man shall be suffered to marry any person " with such licence (the banns not being first orderly pub- " lished) but in the church or chapel where he is Parson, " Vicar, or ordinary Curate ; neither at any other time than " is usual for public and common prayer ; neither except M he do first shew his sufficient licence to the Churchwardens " of the said church or chapel : and either by his own " knowledge, or the knowledge of the said Churchwardens, " be assured, that the parties to be married have thereto " the assent of their parents or other governors." But they refused to hear it ; and the strange Minister (whose name was Lewis) told the Vicar he had sufficient authority, shewing him a licence under seal ; which the Vicar offered to read : but before he had read half of it, Sir Thomas snatched it away from him, and offered him a rial to marry him. But he refusing, Sir Thomas bade the other go forward. But the Vicar, when the other began to read, resisted him, and shut the book. Whereupon Sir Thomas thrust him away, and told him he had nothing to do therewith, and that he should answer it for resisting my Lord Bishop's authority. And one Godolphin, one of Sir Thomas's party, took him up, and told him he shewed him- self malicious. Whereupon, after once more forbidding him, he held his peace. Edmund Lucy, Esq. one that lived in Sir Henry Cock's family together with the Lady Dorothy, coming in, plucked away the book from the Minister ; who told him he should answer it, and was in danger of a pre- munire for resisting the Bishop's authority ; and so he went ADDITIONS. 219 forward with his office without the surplice, in his cloak, with his riding boots and spurs, and despatched it hastily. This soon came to the Court : and she being a daughter of one of the ancient noblesse, (though she herself was in the plot,) gave great offence; and Sir Henry Cock, being a Justice of Peace, was commanded to take the examination of the matter, and send it up. And in fine, the Bishop of London underwent much blame for his Faculties. And what followed upon it you may read in the history. An enumeration of Books, both printed and manuscript, made use of by the Author in compiling this Work, or mentioned in it. PRINTED. Roger AschairTs Schoolmaster, printed anno 1571. His Latin Epistles, printed at London anno 1578. Admonition to the People of England : wherein are an- swered the slanderous untruths of Martin the Libeller and others, printed anno 1589. An Admonition to the Parliament, by Tho. Cartwright and others, about the year 1570. Antipathy of Popish Prelates. By Will. Prin. Acts and Monuments of the Church. By John Fox. A Blast against the Government of Women. By John Knox. A Brief View of the State of the Church. By Sir John Harrington. The Book of Canons agreed upon in the Convocation House, anno 1571. The Concent. By Hugh Broughton. The Discovery of a gaping Gulph, whereinto England is like to be swallowed by another French Marriage. Writ- ten by Stubbs. Printed 1579. Decades. By Hen. Bullinger. De Disciplina. A book set forth by Puritans anno 1574. An evident Display of Popish Practices, or patched Pela- gianism. By Hopkinson. Printed anno 1578. De Ecclesia. By Wickliff. Ecclesiastical History. By Tho. Fuller. AN ENUMERATION OF BOOKS, &c. Farewell Sermon at St. Paul's. By Bishop Sandys, anno 1576. Funeral Monuments. By Weever. George Giffard against Barrow the Separatist. History of St. Paul's Church. By Dugdale. Harborough for faithful Subjects. By John Aylmer. Printed at Strasburgh anno 1559- Historia Literaria. By Dr. Cave. The Innocency of the Scotch Queen. Writ in French. Martin Marprelate. A Proof. By Tho. Dorman, Priest. Ten Reasons. By Campion the Jesuit. A Pamphlet in rhyme against the King of Spain, upon the Defeat anno 1588. Mr. Squire's Sermon at Paul's Cross. His Sermon at the Assizes at Hertford, Mr. Newce being High Sheriff. Stow's Survey of London. The Queen's Power in Spirituals. By John Aylmer. MANUSCRIPT. Disciplina Ecclesias sacra, Dei verbo descripta. Collections Historical and Genealogical, of Sir George Buck, Kt. Several volumes in the Library of the College of Arms. Manuscripts of Sir Henry St. George, Kt. Clarencieux King of Arms. Manuscripts in the Paper Office. Manuscripts of the Right Reverend Father, the present Bishop of Norwich. The Registers of Bishop Aylmer and other Bishops. Epistolae Johannis Foxii Martyrologi. Manuscripta penes me. A Visitation Book of Molineux, sometime Ulster King of Arms of Ireland. THE END. Princeton Theological Seminary Librar 1 1012 01188 0962 DATE DUE DEMCO 38-297