O PRINCETON. N. J. -v" PEINCETON, N. J. Presented by Mr. Samuel Agnew of Philadelphia, Pa. Agnew Coll. on Baptism, No. /6%S. r Scribe, y C Letter anftoered, A¥P barifee, > m&his^Separates churched, {Hypocrite^ L%)ipj)ers fprin kled: OR, A Jc^dA VINDICAT OF THE C H UR C H, UNIVERSITIES O F ENGLAND, In many Orthodox Tenets & Righteous practices, Whcrcunto is added A Narration of a publick Dipping, June 16. i6$6. • In a Pond of much Leigbes Parifh in Mjfe'x , with a ccn- fure thereupon. By feffryWatts B. D. andRettour ^Much-Lcighes. Woe to you Scribes, Phari fees, Hypocrites, for ye (hut up the Kingdom of Heaven againfi men ; jor ye neither go in your felves, nor fuffer you them, who are entring to go in Math. m.i 3 ■ We can do nothing againjl the truth, but for the truth , z Corinth. 13.8. Am I ifieyefore become your enemy, becanfe 1 tell you the truth ? Gal. 4. 37 "" Omnes qui Cacholicam feilamur fidem opt amu* fy tupimus damnari Hrrefin, homines etmendari : aut certeft in err ore voluerint permanere non noUram culpam ejfe quifcripfi- tnm,fedeorum qui mendacitim pr&tulerunt veritati. Hiercnhnw in Proa;mio ad Dial.adve-.PeVg. « London, Printed for Edward Dod, at the Gun in Ivy Lawe,*n cPr#fertim Q^fnglicantf, ■ ET Qbaris fratribus Sttiniftrisjxccipui ESSEXIANIS, A L M M quoquc M A T R I ACADEMIC, Speciatim CANTABRIGIENSI, ET Claris Nutricibus Collegia ,Nom'matim EMANUELIS & JESU, Hunt [contra fcribam Anabapiiftam) Libcllum, fcilicetjfuftam Vindicationm ECCLESIiE. Et <*ACAT>EMUE9 (Vclut ultimum fuum uCriufquc vcracitati Tcftimonum, ) In tiMicUmfttAgmUttdinis & obfervAntU*to*pi*w fa, dicat^DtdiCMquc GALFRIDUS WATTS. TO TUE JUDICIOUS READER S. IN order to gratifie not fo much the Printers modeft Defires, and honeft advantages , as greater and more publick concernments} I have been perfwaded to give you t and the fober world with you, fome acs count both of the Author, and this Piece tfo far as I may be able to judge of the one by long ac- quaintance, and of the other by the lace bro- ken view I had of it in (beets. The Auhor is my neighbour, but , rather by vicinity -of place, than frequency of intcr- courfe. "To the Reader* courfe ; my friend alfo : but more by a gene- rail Civility , and Chriflian Charity, than any particular indearments, or fpeciall interchain ges of amicitiall Offices. For fuch hath been my unhappinefle,that in twenty years knowledge of him, /havefcarce ieen him twenty times j (o that my cenfure of him and bisy may appear lefTef artiall, as no way prejudged and bialted by any fuch frequent converfc, as ufually lo conforms the minds and manners of men, that it not onclyf&ayes their affections, but alfo foreflalls their judge- ments, every man being jealous to juftifie the choice of his friend(hip, no lelTe than of his Re- ligion, But in this I ftand at fo juft, and conve- nient a diftance, that as /have a true and full view, fo 1 am likely to give a free and imparti- all teflimony, both of the Author and his work. To tell you he is a Gentleman of a good ex- trattion-, of liberall education y not lightly dipty but deep dyed in Academicall Learning, having been many years, and with much repute Fel- low of lefus Colledge in Qimbrtdge^ to tell you, that he is blell with a fair eUatey more with a ferious mind} mod with an exemplary life; thefc are cIothecB^ader. are all true,but not fo pertinent it may be to your and the worlds expectation 9 or the Printers purpofe , which feems chiefly inquificivc of his MiniUeriall dimenfions, or the proportions of his tongue and pen", the one as to iht Pulpit y the 02 ther as to the Preffe. In thefe regards, 7 may candidly, and truly teftifie, that / efteem Mt.Ieffry Watts, one of the moft learned, judicious, grave, and well tem- pered Dinfines in this County of Effex, (ac lcaft of my acquaintance) a lerious and con* fiant fludenty an acute Difputant, a found and fober Preacher 5 having that,in the exadlnefle, Weight, and ftrength of his Difcourle, which others make up mloudneJ?ey length and lungs: a lefle popular Oratour indeed^ than many of far lefle abilities, (which is the injudicious peoples fault and infelicity, not his) but his DivineO- ratory flows in a more clear and deep, though fofzer ftreamy than moft of thofe Torrents whic h make a great noife but are but (hallow and troubled, In fum, (not to drive his worth too sthin) I cftccm him a Magazine of well digefted Learning , a great mafler not onely of much knowledge; but of his pafsion, of a temper iogenioufly ?e- renc. To the Reader. rcne,yet prudently refer vedj neither morofenor fequacious, with both arms ever embracing the Truth and peace, the power and order, the pu- rity and unity of Religion; ftudious alwayes to preferve the fundamentals, tnunimentals }and orna- mentalls of this,fometimes, famous 6cflourifbmg7 now .deformed and diftrefled Qhurcb of England. He was and is, void as of all fuperflitious noyeU tiesfopf all ^ealotick tranfportsps free from luke- yparmnefie, and popularity in Religion, as full of pious and prudent moderation^ /have fometimes been his ay of preachings but /hut up and dark to all other ufes, either for Gods glory , or the Churches good , whereto fome mens great and many talents might be happily employed and improved. Nothing more hin- ders thefplendour and proficiency of Religion, than the preferment of mean abilities, to pub- lick confpicuity, and the confinement of great parts to private obfeuritics. Every flarre fhould be fitted with its orb or fphcare, and every Candle fct in a meet Candlestick, where it may fhine not onely in plain preaching, and good li- ving, but in writing , coun felling , and gover- ning the Church of Chrifh lever looked upon this worthy Author, as dc- ferving Auditors of a finer mold y than ufually the Countrey Clod affords, where vaft difparity and grofle ignorance ufually bring forth rUftiek f infolency To the Reader. tnfolency and under "valuing; Yet his modefty^wzri- nefle, or wifdome5 hach for many years been contented with the/^wo^ndfafety of that/i- Ymgy in which Gods proyidince firft placed kinn not wrihout good fruit, among thofe that are worthy toinjoy his judicious and conftant la- bours y of which he hath not abated fince his years increafed, flncehisftrength of body decay- ed, fmce the iniquity of times abounded , fincc England became (Africa Septentrionalh) the Nor- thern Africa ' productive of many SMonfterSi and ferpents , whofe ingratefull \ and impudent fierccnefle feeks, notonely to difiourage, but to deftroy thofe worthy Preachers, who (like John 1kjrti/?)have moft for warned this generation of Vipers to flee from the watb that is to come : The Chriftian patience, gravity and charity of this worthy Author hath flill kept on hisf^e,though he hath met with fome Adders in the way, bi- ting at his heel, bethinks it as much bis part to do and deferve well, as theirs to fpeak and re- quite ill. Thus you have a (bar tier of the Terfon and his worth- As for his wiring this piece (which I have cur- forily perilled in fcverall Sheets) is the firft he ever To the Reader. ever adventured to 'let forth; though he hath lived in an age, whole Venemous fcrihling, would provoke a Stoick to apply the antidote of his pen to prcferve (if pofliblc) this reformed Church, its holy Mini/try and Mimttration from poyfonous putrefattioa : His filcncc hath not been for want of ability, induftry, ot qsal (his axe being not \cttc/btrpt though it did not fwim till now) but out of a native modcAy and discreet diffidence, either of himfelf, or the age in which helives, which he faw could fcarce bear either itimaladies or its remedies: yea ir is fo in love with its difea- fes , that it is grown to hate its beft Tbyji- clans y who will icarch moft and flatter lead. To this may be added that fvarineffe which age brings with it , making a ^ife man loth to ex- po (e himfelf (asa candle fet in the windx to the ftrife of tongues, or to engage in the Euripus of vulgar difputes and endlefle janglings, then, when he hath almoft made the port, and gained the happy haven of an holy reft, and heavenly tranquility. This long and cautious flence of this Author attended ('now) with the burden of age, and many bodily infirmities, fome men (of late irC tcrpreting to be his weakneffe, and Cowardij , ^f & have To the Reader. have been emboldened to conteft with him (as the frogs did with theN/gW^/^yeajtheirgoofe quill hath dared to challenge luch an Eagle j like Tigmitssind dwarfs, adventuring to infukover an aged, but not impotent y Qyaat, 1 heir firftaflault (itfeems; was by tempting him with many quefiions^s the Scribes & Thari- Jces did our blefled Saviour Jefus Chrift, which quaeres are with much more eafinefle propoun* ded and confounded by weak men, than unfnar* led and anfwered by wife men; eipecially to that fort of heady people, whole narrow minds, arc more capable of ftiort threads and broken ends, than of whole skains and methodicall difcourfes of Religion • Certainly no , Solomon is fufficient ro refolve all the Scepticall Quriofities ,, wherewith lbme mens itch, is daily either Scrat- ching themfelves,or rubbing ag^inft others, tf- pccially againft the true Minifiers of the Church of England, with whom thefe Tlebeian Sophy- flers, affeft rather to gain the Reputation of a bold conteU, in which they are alwayes yicloricus and triumphant, than to get or give that fatisfas ftion which Scripture, reafon, and pious antique ty can afford to Cbriflians, that are To confeienti- oufly fcrupulous, as a man may find Come bottom* To the Reader, (Bottome and bounds of their Difpures. Other mens petulant importunities f together with rm own Tiety & Charity , have moved him to the pains of this io Urge and zl .bora e anfuper. for which (firft) his Inquifitors (whether they meant to be his 7 m^to-^ Iriers or Tor meters )■ have great caufe to thank him, thathefufTcred him/elf (at thefe years of his life (being pall 70) and in the decrepit age of a bedrid Ckurcb{wholc once) well reformed Religion feems not oncly de- cayed , bu: dying and deplored ) to be o- vcrcome by their / cornfuli foil 'icitations^ to take to much pains ^ in order tofatisfie them if they have humility, and capacity to make ufe of his/^r- neilabours ; which were no doubt the more te- dious to him becaufe confined to Sub j;- els fo trite and common^ that like the reciprocation of fawsr they have almoft fawn afunder this Qburch>t both as to the folidity ofics Doclrine,nid the fan- ctity of its prof efsion: as for Chliftian Charity and Vnity, modefty, and SMeikntfle^ they are (like Jawzduftjhln to the ground between the divided parties and pieces of it. JnthcnextpUce^myfelf, with all others that own relation, honour and adhcrency to the Qurch of England, do ow a debt of deferred thank* , Ta the Reader. thanks to this worthy Author , who hath not de^ fpifed the low and afflitfed State of his mother and brethren j nor by a Qowardly fi knee pleaded his great years for his excufobut hath rvivoious* ly and fva'iantly afrrted her, by a work full of Scriptural , rati on all , Logical!, and Iheologicall ftrengtlyn which he is Ihe more to be commen- ded, becaufe he vouchfafes to condefcend to the meanefl: capacities of his Rural! zr\& illiterate Jin- tagonifts, whom he difdains not to correct in their Abcedarian faults of falfc Englilh, as well as in their more?z0f0r/0Wj,and dangerous errors. ! For my part / ferioujly re] oyce to fee th e honour of the Church of England ( which I think was not inferiour to any Church fince the Primitive times y and Apo&olick Centurie)t\\m vindicated by a Veterane fon and fouldierjntho hath a long time flood a faithfull watchman, or fentiml, at that pofl or ward, where he was orderly placed ; and now ('renewing his agey at leaft bis courage) he hath not made his age zfuperfedeas to his arms or his yveakneftey any difpenfation from this holy war, but well armed and rejolyed hath (as one of Davids Worthies) generoufly incountred, and profperoufly^i/^w/zta/that troop of Sceptical! quettiomfts, who like the ?hiUUims} are many, Ivine To the Reader, lying in wait, though but one appear, aiming firftto defy, next to deftroy, if it were in their power, ail that heavenly hoft of earthly Angels, the godly, learned, and duly ordained Mimfter* of the Church of England , who have a long time fuftained he good fight of faith again ft the Pa- piftson the one fide, and Separates or $icl*ries on the other-, the one fallacious pretenders of Antiquity . the other audacious obtruders of no- velties ; fuch for Doctrine, Difcipline and Go^ vernment, as neither this Churcby nor any G^ tholkkChurchi fi nee the Apoflks times have been acquainted with .• whom to oppofe with all meekneffe of loifiome y as becomes a Chriftian^ and as this worthy Author hath done, is as high zmerity as humane infirmity is capable of, ei- ther in reference to theprejent age, or pofterity, which will never fee another Pboen x arife out of the afhss of the Reform d Cbttrch of England, (fomerimes fo fairy fo flounflaingXo admired of good men, both at home and abroad, fo blefz fed of God withfpeciallGtaces, and Gifts, as Seals of his Spirit) when once factious firesy and Scbifmatick flames have quite confumed it ; which that God of his mercy would for- bid, is my moft earned, and daily prayer j who- To the Reader* who (notfdefpairing of Gods goodneffr, and incouragedby fuch continued fupphes of wor- thy mens indeavours to relieve and recrutc her ) am neither afraid , nor afliamed to ex. prefle fuch a fenfe both of this work, and workman, as / think the)' deferve of all true Bnglifb Trotejlants, and in particular of Bocking in Effex, Tour Servant in ourblefad Jun.io.i6 7. Saviour John Gauden" TO Tothe%eader. TO THE E A D E w fHat (Paradox of the ^ife^man concern- ing a fool> where as,it were with one Pro.iS.^. breach hzforbiddetb, and blddetb to anfvoer him according to his folly y bei ng rightly unfolded, ought carefully to be followed. Nor need we feek further for underftanding the yvmy be cured}this Learned Author hath re.' ofAlixcuU turned a largely ztpithie\ zplainjaut at once both pa ma adfolid and 4£«teanfwertin which refpect (alluding quam di- t0 C|)1C Catachreftical expresfion of an Ancient) I cfjrjus ^^ ^ ft6'** Epi&d** it was an happy Letter y . cbmt&u which hath occafwned Co judicious a difcourfe, trahitur, wherein thofe §}t^eriesi which wcrcfooli(b!y pro* &ci» Aug.pom(iei^ arc bot[1 fitly flat :dtand fully refolvcd. Uedil\\ Indeed it is fo an anfwer 5 that wkha'l, it is an J^p^gie for the perfecutei (yet not destroyed) Qhurch To the Reader, Qhurch of'EngUnd ,her Conflitutionflrdviation^nd Sacramental Adminifiratims , againft the virulent Calumnies ,w\\\c\\ violent Separifts and Anabptifts have moft injurioufly caji upon her. Though all the true Children of Zion have (I doubt not) eyes and hearts to fee, and beraoane her miferies, yet they are but a few, who have tongues and pens to plead her caufe- Loe here, an Aged Atlas putting under his moulders to bear up i\m firma- ment, which fo many have endeavoured to pull dowmyz)9(§^ j ^ what be "tooufd "%\jhy as many as there were Kernels in the Pomegranate y anfwered z»7rv?*s of Zopyrufes, who had been his faithfull fervant, & by disfigu- ring himfelfgo'. thcCitie of Babylon into his Ma- fters hands. It mall be my eameftprayer that the Qhutch of England may never want a Galfridus , who may ftand in the gap to refcue her from her fitf^/otf/rf;z enemies, as well Sectaries as Ro- mamUs* But mxnnm de Tabula. Far be it from me toimaginethat my Teftimonycm add any luftre, either To the %eader, either to this elaborate work, or its worthy Author nor am I willing to detain thee any longer from reaping that content and fatisfattion'm the perufal of thclc excellentTreatiJeS} which hath been al- ready received by Thy friend and June ii, i*57- fervantinthe Lord NATH. HARDY. THE /***'•**«* AUTHORS EPISTLE TO THE l%/& READE Courteous Readers, 'Lthough there is in this Printed Book now in your hands, Lcrer enough, and as much or more anfwer to read \i you pleafe* yet in Civility, and alio for Congruiry, I hive prefixed another Letter, an Epiftle to you, and Printed the fame, that I might be anfwera- ble likewife to your expectation, and theCuflome,and fatisfadory to your admiration and wonder, the which you will enter inro,when you come to th.t Claufe,noi far from the beginning, wherein Ididwadc the writer of the Letter , which I anfwer from his pronenefife and for- wardnelTe of communicating the fame to publtck view, and do cxpreffe my loathnefle and backwardneife thereunto* For fo indeed it was, that when I took pen in hand, to draw up this my anfwer unto his Letter, I intended the A fame The Authors Eptftle fame quantity of Paper, namely two flieets (honld carry back the one as they brought the other, but I found fo much of the Leaver* of the Scribe And f hart fee in the Letter, that it caufed myanfwer, to rife andfwelDmo a greater lump and bulk than I expected, or could well be in conve- nient time tranferibed by the Pen and Manufcript ,though of a ready writer, and therefore I was enforced to fend it to the Style and Topograph of the more fpecdy writer. And for that , why upon my refolution of Printing this, I did not expunge that Claufcagainft this Printing the reafon is, becaufe I would have it ftand upon Re- cord, as a good Proof of my not intending the Prefle, and alfo that it might be a juft Plea and tstpology for my o- miflions of, and deficiencies in many things, which then fhould have been more compleatcd 5 I mean this an- fwer fhould have been more fairly and fully drefled, and better fct out,for you(my learned Readers,for my quserer or Scribe,it is good enough as it is) If I had fore-thought, of its going abroad, and coming into publick view. For can a Bride forget her attire, or a Bridegroom his or* jrf^}\'0 naments, when they go forth, and come abroad into ^*; J6#j0view < fure , 1 fhould have cloathed this my anfwer with pfal^.ii.broidred work of divers colours, and much morevarictie of matter and language, and girded it about with fine lin- nen, and covered it with JilkfiW'iDgxhe Margents and com- paring the Tractate with the pure fayings and fentences of venerable antiquity and claflick authorities : I fhould tsave^^ it with bracelets upon the hands, and a chain on the neck of ir, adorning it with quaint phrafes, compt fimilitudcs, pithy fayings, that fo the Readers as your felves might have taken fome pleafare and delight in the beauty, and comelinclTc of the piece ; whereas now I mud defire you to accept onely of the bare and naked imh, and make what profit and benefit you can out of the fubftance tp the Reader. fubtlance and matter thereof, coming forth without fuch A dornations ( onely exec pting a me an jewel put in the {ore- bead^ an ordinary Title in the Frontifpiece thereof, which is a thing muft needs be) and appearing without the [pots of Habeas, or difl factions of characters, which would have been a greater trouble to the Printer, or Limner, and no great eafe or ufe to you (the learned Readers) who can as wellfeeand view the Proportions of the hdyy bsit of controvcrfie or other divinity, from the bare Limmes, Lines, and lineameaments, though they come not forth, ,as Agrippa and Serniee, o-uvTcohhn ?«r7«ri«, with fo great ^s 2h?$* pomp andfplendor, phanfie. or Emphafie 5 yea though it be fet out without welt or gard of R hetoricall jftmw; and feathers , artificiall decks and dreffes, exoticall tongues, and languages, in a plain, old, Engliflb mode, and fa- fbion. And indeed this falls out very fitly and happily, as to the party I have to anfwer,who is his n'own mothers fon, every inch of him, and his Letter is his n'own mothers tongue every fyllablc of it, him a homefpun^ whether web or webfter, Farmer^ or preacher,I know not,(there is fuch a mixture and confufion of things, and callings amongft them) an abfolutc and profclted enemy to all humane Learning and Sciences of Schools and Uni- verfides, a very Barretourand wrangler againft,and crier down of all, acquired arcs and parts there? and therefore of the knowledge of the Learned languages , Hebrew , Greek and Latine. It would have been to no purpofe at all for me, intending (aslhavefaid) myanfwerof his Letter no further than himfelf, to have (pent any time, (which mould, and would have been but loft) in cm- bclliming and embroidering it with pretious and golden teftiraonics, and quotations of ancient Fathers and au- . thotSjGreek and Latine,or in interlacing and ovcrfpread- A 2 ing the Authors Eptttle log it with filken and diver faying*, and fencenccs ot lat- ter and modern writers, forreign and domeftick too •, He would but have flood gazing and wondring at them, and a Bxol 1 6, un(jci ft00cj nothing, and have faid a Manhu, what is this, 15* and have cryed our, Ob thou man of God ,7 here is deato hcExod'v6r%in ^e Pot * tnouSn tncrc was nothing but* 4 pot full of Manna. Yea, he would not have come near, or touched the Body of my anfaer, foi fear, or out of hatred of fuch the Scholars fine dfciTcs, or University rich attires about it,as which are an Abomination to the Egyptians ,&: I mould dMat,7, 6. bur have caft fuch park btfore (wine, who would have c 7-0,1 j .22, tra-mpigjupMtfami 2X\d hung golden J- twds or rings in a (wines fnout,who would have nothing but gruntled againft f2iOX9.ii **• ^or "j^u know the man and his communication: according to whom and which is therefore the ani wer, and my re- plication, plain and impolifhed, rude and incompt- But now and then, U confeffe) it is a little tart and fait, for fuch alfo is the man and his communication* Once and fomewhile I was purpofed to anf wcr his Let- ter with iltcnce, the beft way (they fay) toanfwer, I, to weary, and to wear out a fcolding either man or woman , and to have tried what this would have done upon the man, and his hot and fcalding, as well as fcolding communication, but then that of the Prophet g J/&.6.11. Ifaiah came into my mind, (gFor Sions fake, will I not hold mi peace, and for Hierufalems fake, will I not reft, un- till the righteoufneffe thereof go forth as brightneffe, and the falvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. and that alfo of b Prov.i6 5 Solomon, h i^nfwer h/my UH he be wife in his own conceit t and others be made foolifli by him . If therefore I be fomcwhatfmarr4W/Z>4r/>, when he fcemed to be vile and bafe, I mud anfwermuch like "Da- :zSm,€9ii vid, It was before the Lord, faid he,it is for the Lord fay I, For to the Reader. " *" For the L^rd and for Gideon $ it is in defence of ffierufa-vI"d&*7»*% lent And S ion, the Church and her Miniftcrs, thellniver- (l ies and their Schollers , againft the tsfecufer of the Brethren, and the Accurferoi the mothers, the Blatcrz- ga nft humane Learning and Sciences, the Blafier of fa* cred Orders and Ordinances , and fo a tlafphemer of God andgodlineffc thereby. Volo in crimineH&re- jjterQme feos newinem ejfe patienttm. Old Father Hierome by his 2 Ep.ad goad will would have no man to be patient, upon a Tammacb, charge and accufation of Herefie put upon him : I mud adver£.\o- thcreforc either have b^en no man, at leaft wife no Mini- hm^ircA fterof the Church of England, if I had been wholly •*/?*% Jilent, or altogether patient, upon fuch a Senacberib-Rab- [ V*\37«*« fhakeh Letter fent me, which chargcth not my fclf onety in particular, but all the Minifters of the Church otEng- land, and the Church it felf, with hcrefies, impieties and impurities, and (almoft) with allwhatfoevcr is impure, impious, and heretical^ yea Diabolicall, as you (hall fee at the beginning, and throughout his Letter. \iCMofesthemnteekeflman on earthi whileft he lived m.EW.i 2,3 upon it, had now lived upon earth, and received this Letter, and feenand heard this brazen facd-Effex-Ca/fnExo^.t^* (this impudent Letter I mean) blating out biafphemies againft Chrifls holy Church, andOrdinanccs, like as he did fee and hear that Golden- fae'd Ifraels- Calf, the mol- ten Image, proclaiming Idolatry againft Gods holy wor- fhip and ferviee. it would have been with him as in the © provocation and as in the day of temptation in the wilder m jf, 0 pr^ g and his meek Spirit would have been fo far provoked a- '" gain it throne, as the other, that he would have p burnt this Letter (as that Idol) in the fire, or have torn kroPj£*^32» pieces, as he ground that to powdtr. 2o%* Or as Another Father faith ofMofes3Caufampopuli apud Deum precibttS) Caufam D ei apudpoptUum gladtis, allegavit A 3 utrobiqm The Authors Eplftle qregorlib,$ utrobique Legatus fortis, utrobique Mediator admirabilis, Mor*> that valiant AmbatTadour, that wonderfull Mediatour Mofes t meek M fifes , who ever afted and pleaded the peoples caufes of offence, to God or himfclfwith/>r^rj, and tears, would here, as there he did , have agitated Gods caufc and offence, with Fire and Sword- but I mean Jer. 23.29. oncty q the Fire of the word, and the Sword of the Spirit; Epb,6,ij. which is the fame again(t(as the Idolatrous people there, fo) thjsblafphcming, and reviling party and people here. For I do not look upon, and read this Letter, a> the acl and work onely of the fubferibed name and perfon, but as the Vox populi, the voice of the people of that Se&: like as the Blafphemous Letter, that Rabjhekeh fent to Hezekiah, W3S penned and came originally from his Mailer Sennacherib, and the publick Senate there, of Syria : fo this 'viperous Letter lent to me hTued out (I may juftly fufpccl)of the head and belly of the Serpent, the vi- pers dam, orftepdame, yea and was afliftedand roid- wifed into the world by a generall Congregation and Generation of the fuch like, (clfc it would not have been fo hijfrd about, That all the Mimfiers ojBffex could not an- fiver the Letter fent to me. Is not the hand of £oab, and the fonnes of Zerviah in all this matter of sXbfolon ( and Letter of the Scribe ) though put into the mouth of a woman of Tekoah, and a man oiWaltham , 2 Sam. izbut the Ionian Rebellion, whereof the Author was much queftioncd, and the fuf- pitionlay betwixt two, by name Hi ftiaus and Arijlago- ras 5 Artapbernes} a witty fellow decided the matter in thefe words before them both, ISroliuWup* 1^*4*5 ^ Herod \f.lo**v ttisfab v*tfrn*h* whole Alphabet of thofe illiterate Letters, or A. B. CV. had a hand here, (for there is no head or head piece) in this Letter. And this I thought good to certifie you of (my good Readers) aforehand, to be the caufe why, (left when you read my anfwer you wonder that) I anlwer to more than my queerer propoundeth or objecleth. Far my purpofe was, (when I faw my anfwer would be forae- what larger, than at firft I conceived or projected) to do fomething againft their gcncrall caufe, and not onely againft this particular Letter, and therefore I do not an- fwer onely to what this Letter '+Sct -the ', or Scribler, rather hath faid, but to what fomc other Book or Pamphlet-mi- ters of them have printed, as who perceived, though this Boaster came forth alone, as Golf ah inthef$refront;z s (Goliah carried bratfe on his legs andihoulders, but this am-l7* carrieth bralTe in his face and forehead) yet all the Phili- Jlim were embodied and encamped behind him, Their King- b Matt\i. dome not being divided againft it (elf but united toge- 2 6, ther, neither doth Satan catt out^ but help in Satan : where- c Luke 1 6% 8 in the men of t bis world are volfer in their Generation than the children of the Kingdome of God, namely in holding and uniting together. But whoibever, and how many focver,and how united foever they were, who were the makers of thefe two lea- thern mooes, or thefe two letter meets ; there was ncvezWtftiui araongft them all , or a goods hooe-w.iker, but very Cobiers and Bunglers at fuch a bufinclTe. For fbefidesthat they make abundance offalfeftitches in Eng- i;fi) the Authors Epiftie lifhy and the matter, even the Leather ihcvwoik ow, fs W,and not well tanned, ^riiin and loofe as paper.) They go beyond their lap , which a good Shooc- maker fhould never do, (it is their Rule 5 and a proverb there- ,r«~*~r. imon^ a i^Ww«H«WJ beyond their meafure , or line, as though they reached unto m (Minifters4J For they are com as far as to us, in preaching the Gofpel ofchrift, (to ufe the Apoftles words) and (to add a word of mine) in diftri- buting the Seals of the Gofpel, and beyond all mea of the world, in fending abroad railing Letters againft the Miniftcrs & Church of Engl when as the world of men, fee afide thcmfclvcs , do plainly fee , that fuch men arc better at an Atole than a Pen, and can make better work with Pitch &W*xjihzf\ Paper and Inkers ,who have more skill in a Shooc-makcrs End , than a Logicians Conclufion^ and in a Carters Rope, then a Difputcrs Reafon , and more verfed in the Meafum of Corn and Cloth, than in the Myfteries of the Gofpel and truth. Far be it from me, (and God forbid ic if any fuch thought (bould arife, and come upon me) to gain- fay, or call: forth a bad word upon, or to envy, and look upon with an evil cye,pcoples knowledge & learning inDivine and Evangelical truths * yea, I will,and cannot but in zeal to their falvation, and Gods glory, exhort , and call upon Chryf.homil them^sC^/^^wedoth,*^^"^! ^xciaJ, Si n^nKci £ Vr W7&&* fZtC\ict.y 9&§fActK(t T»f f\xjy%t,tt' \j.n<&v iu\.ov, CvM^rhyvv 9.m capita ^v» f KTfoa.f%i TZv '\vXStt l<*rgjJ'. i & proper and peculiar Pasfions and Maladies • for therefore °r'£* inl'^ they were (elected and written down of the Holy fpirit5 37* and made Scripture. Onely I mindeyou,to read them dayly and diligently, with Prayer, Humility , Piety, Pru- dence, and fear, and throughout, comparing places toge- ther, which fpcakof the fame matters, or refer one to an- other. Yea, and I will prctTe upon you that of the Apoftle, CelofaiS, Let the word of Chi fl dwell in you richly , or plenteoujly in all wifdom, teaching and admomjhing one another in ?[ alms and Bymnes, and Spirit ml fongs 5 fo richly and plcntcoufly that they, the Mafters and Gove rnours of Families, may be able to teach and inftru6t. them in the principles of the Doclrincsof Chrift, as David and Bathjhebadid Solomon Prw'.W* their Son % and as Lois and Eunice did Timothy, child to 31. 1: the one9and Grand- Child to the other. Yea , farther; A * 7faf.i.$. private godly Lay-man, or woman, (I think) who is en- .3*1?- dued with knowledge of the Divine mifterics , may alfo for the benefit of his Family, give the fenfe of a Tc*r5and make an expounding of Scripture, according to the Ana- logy of Fair.h,and the foundations of Ghriftian Religion; and may alfo take home a neighbour, and Communicate of their knowledge unto him , as -Atptila and Prifcilla did ^# x g ^ 1^06 polios, though a man mighty in the Scriptures , and ex- pounded the way oftfod more perfectly unto him. But if fuch being of the ordinary and vulgar people will break thefe Bounds ejr Limits fetthem , & will afand up into the Mount of the Church Pulpit, or Desk, or take Sxod, 1 ?.23. lothemfclves the Houfe, Chaire , or Table , there, of 23, their own fclf-will praefumptuoufly, before they are Authorifed by others, and ignorantly, before they have learned thcmielves to teach and difpenfe publickly the b Myfte- The Authors EptHle Myfteries of falvation out of the word* to adminifter the feals and Sacraments of the fame folemnely, to decide Queftions and Controverfies peremptorily, and (as their manner is ) Negatively from Scriptures, to cenfure the Grdcrsand the Ordinances of the Church, ra(hly,and in- confiderately ; and to Quaere and Quarrel, or rarher ap- peal Miniflers, as foon as they have ended their Sermons of Hserefie and Blafphemy, proudly, and arrogantly, I muft then tell them, that with Nadab and Abihu , they of- Levit ro i ferftra#gefire before the Lord, which be commanded them not- ' (and it is Gods mercy , that 4 fire goeth not forth from the Lord and devoureth tnem-,)&. I mall reckon them amongft Coloj. a. 1 8. the Co'osjian Impo(lorSy who intruded into thofe things which they h we not feen, vainly puft up by their flefhly mindes , and not holding the head \ Chrift, who hath difiributed feveral Rom.i 2 ,4. offices to feveral Members, and not the fame or all, to eve- ry one, Yea,and I will take them up in the round words of that great Bifhop BafiL, who, as Tbeodoret rclateth , when the Clatk, or M after Cook of the Emperours Kitchin, (whofc name was Vemofthenes') being both unskilfull and igno- rant, and alfo a very bold and infolent fellow Reprehend- ed Baftl, and refilled him, teaching that which was right and true, He, Bafd handled him roughly, and anfwered him fharply \ c°» es**v> ^5; t&Tv r^a^Sp K&ivKtUf ffoyrlfa sft>fxa- Twvyi^tiaf \.7in.ie*f V J^u'vctaai , fiifivtrpAVcii lya* 7»V etJC&oc? . it IS your place and office, Mr. Cook, to ta he care of feafoning the Emperours Broth and Caudelsfor him. For by reafon you have your eares fluff ed and opplete (with Kitchin fturfc and fuch foyland fordes,) you cannot hear the Divine myfteries and dogmaticals I preach. To the like purpofc , I may round in the ear, fome prefumptuous (in the like kinde) ♦ Jgnaro's^and may fay, it is your place, Good-man Web- Jier, to follow your (buttles and textures, and not to pro- vide to the Reader \ vide a Text and a Sermon againft: the Lord? day .-and yours Good-man Taller, to fit on yourfhop-board , and work with your Needle and Thread, and not to fit at the Lords Tabic and confecrate wine and break bread $ and yours, Good- man Farmer, to keep to your Ploughing and Towing in your own fields, and the skreening and querning of your Malt, and not to break our,unto preach- ing & fermoning in the pulpits of others,and fall a skreek- ing and qucring againft Minifters. As for the Good-wives I have nothing to fay of them, who have wit enough to keep themfelves well-bufied ac ' their Churnes and Diftaffes, and (uniciTe it befome of the Quaking Sect,) more wit, then, fas fomc of their huf- bands) to intermeddle in the Church bufinefles , in the Difcipline and Doctrines of the lame, to Qyjere and Ca- vil, revile, and flaunder them, though confonant and a- grecable to the Scriptures. Otherwife if they alfo will bepratlingof,and againft our preaching, and fpending their words more then their wits , in matters above them, I (hall make ufe of Telemachus fpeech to Pepelope, except- ing to good and skilfull Mufick and Muficians. A*X' tit otKOvtlfii, 7^ray7n< "tf¥*> Kof*/£«, rj ^ 'Irip t* fya-KOLTWii yjj afAfnroXoHriK'iKiut nomer O* I will englim it for them whom it concerns, as thus, woman, get you home, and follow your own bufineiTes of fpinning and and webbing, and bid your maids finifli their works. Let the Miniftery of the word alone to men. For fo Saint Paul would not permit a woman tobe ar C«rj+. Speaker or Teacher in the Church, or of Church af-34. fairs, no nor any man who is ignorant anduncxpert in them, unfent and unapproved of it, as my book will c- b 2 videncc The (^Authors Epttle vidcncc to retort the words of their ring-leaders, Core, Vathan, and Abiram* Te t die too much upon you ye fonms of Simeon, and daughters of Gad, and more than ye can 'Kum. 1 6.3. well carry out before God or man, though you bear it high, and lift up your felves amongft your brothers and -Ep^/ 4.1 1. 'friers, even as high as Paftors and Teachers. In which fenfeonely it was, that Hierome complained. Uieyontex* JEpifl. ad 1 ' J£w>d medic drum e(l , Prcmittum Medici \ traclant fabriliafabri ; Sola Scripturarum ars eft, quamfibi pafsim omnes vindicant* Scribimus indotti, doclique poemata fafsim. Hancgarula anmt Ham delirusfenex, bancfophijlaver^ boftts , banc univerfi pr/efumunt , lacerant } docent , ante- quam difiant. Nor Hierome , nor I , nor any Minifter that I know of, do (as the Papiftsdo) forbid the Lay and fccular calling, from , or rebuke for reading in, commenting upon, expounding of, or arguing out of Scripmrcs, who have attained to any good meafurc of knowledge and understanding in,andof,them ; of which fort, as former ages have recorded many worthies,whofe names are Honorable in the Church, fo thefe prcfent times do frequently produce very eminent Gentlemen, whom I muft needs name fome of them Honoris caufi, as Sr. Richard Baker of Kent , Mr. fobttTimfonof Leicefter, Mr. William Morice of Devonfhire, ail which have com- mitted learned works and labors to the Prejfc, worthy alfo in an orderly way to afcend the Pulpit, and thence to difpence the Sacred Myfteries,if they thought good, as another worthy Gentleman and Juftice of Peace in Suf- folk , Mr. Lucas hath, whom the Reverend Bijhop of Nor- mchbtioxc he deccafed., ordained a Presbyter and Mini- fter of the word , upon his zealous and devout defire tJkfcof. But to the Reader. But this is that which TJierem complained of in his time, and we Miniftcrs of thefc ages do except to, That whereas all men of other Trades and Vocations keep within the comp3fTe of thofe things that belong to them, the Phjfician dealing in Medicinal matters,and the Smith in Iron worksjand none of them profefleany Trade, with- out a lawfulltimeof learning it, and a lawfull liberty of pra&ifing it, all both men and women too, of rhc ordina- ry and Lay-condition of the Vulgar Trades and Myfte- ries 5) as (to fpeak in Hicroms words) the garrulous mai- ling old 'wife ', the delirous doting eld man , the verbofe loning £raftfman>znd(l &d6)ti\\sfcurrilousfcr,bling Plough-man, I have to deal with, (who if he make his Plough to go no lighter in his field, then he hath done, his Pen in his Lct^ ter,he makes as mad work there, as here he hath done,) I fay (fuch they are we except to,) who have not learned, or known the Scriptures , neither the language nor the fenfe of them, nor do yet well skill the foundations and principlerof their Religion, nor can give a reafon of their Faich and Hope,do yet prefume to interpret^xpound^and Preach them (as themfelves call it) not onely in the Chaires, and at the Tables of their own private domeftical meeting houfes, but alfo in the Desks , and out of the P///- fits of lome of our Vacant,or too indulgent publick Paro- chial Churches, where the unlearned and nnft able of them trrc H St . Pauls Epi files , as --t bey do alfo the other S captures 3»^.$.T& nnto their own(zs conftrudtion, fo) deftruflion, & to others both Confufion and Delufion : Prtfumunt, lacer ant \docent priufquam difcant , asHierome faith, which words, with his former above, (though cited by the Papists, for their interdicting the ufe of the Bible unto the common peo- ple in their National tongues) if they' do nor fuffkiemly clear Hierome from Papijing with them, I am fure , thofe other words of his upon the Epiftle to the Col. 3 , 16. will b 3 do The Authors Epiftle do it fufficiemly -, yea , abundantly to a Syllabic : tor writing upon thofc words. Let the word ofChriH dwell in you, the people of Cole 0c, **»*/•$ richly or plertteoujly teaching and admonifhing one another ; he faith, hie oflenbitur wrbum ChriJli., non folumfufficienter , fed abundant er habere dcb etiam Laicos, & invicem (etr.etipfos docere ejr monere. Here it's declared and manifefted by the Apoftle that even the laicke and popular fort of men and women, ought to have the word of Chrift dwelling in them not onely fufficiently ,but abundantly , and to teach and admonijh one another t which is privately in Pfalms,Hymnes,e^. This judgement of Hieronimm I embrace , as Vscr ^a?, and fubjeft mine to it, as a [acred Law : But I mall offend, I fee, in the length of my Epiftle to the Reader, like as I have (I perceive) in the largeneffe of myanfwer to the Scribe : and yet I muft give you alfo fome account about the Title, and Dedication of the fame. ifapparoVi I fuperfcribe the party I anfwer, a Sribe firft , and that becaufe of hisLctter?not his literature,or learning. There, CM..*. 22. wjierc gr< M4tfaw faith, there was a Lawyer, St. Mark re- Mark\2 ^atlDb tnc ^amc ^ory> hub, a Scribe , put them together* 2g. The Lawyer Scribe was the learned Scribe, ex pert in tranferibing and expounding the Law oiMofes. Such a ?fra 7. one was Efr 'a the Scribe, and (uch is fpoken of by our Sa- CMat. 1 3. vlcur Chrifl in Mathew , and called a Scribe inftrufied unto 35. the Kingh&m o/God,and fuch a one I mean not. But befides this, there was amongft the Jews , a Scribe, who' wrote onely out Adts,Dccrees, Wills, Contracts, and fuch like, and was but as a Secretary, Rotary, Scrivener, with us, and therefore where St. Mathew faith ,a certain Mat, $,19. Scribe came, and faid, Sr. Luke reporting the fame matter, L*ks9*¥?\ faith;* certain man came,and faid, &c. The certain Man- fcribe (put them together) was but an ordinary, and iW- garScrihyxa&ited in transcribing things but not skilled at totht Reader. "" " —- — ««£wftilcdbymein*c7^?,dai"ct a *"'< »s my i Cfr. 24.6, 1 wcr : no Law book lcarncd^utonclyTOSS??1 m.y an- cd £«7^, and fcarccly that neither. But why Pharifee^you will fay * I will give you this out fyipb. r<"». of Epiphanius. Dicebanlur Pharifei, eo qnod, feparati ejfent l * %c' l ' ab altis propter fpontaneam fupcrflnam Religioxem apud tpfos receptam Pbares enim in Hebraica lingua feparattonem fi- gnificat. And I will Bnglifh it for them whom it con- cerned, that they may underftand themfclvcs. They were called Pharifes, becauk they feparated them- i elves from others for the pradtifing of their fuperfluous will-worfbip fuch as is (Hcufc-preaching , and Pond- dippings. ) For Hares in the Hebrew tongue, (as Jwvpfo®- in the Greek) (Ignifiah a feparate, or reparation. How art tins. thou broken forth ^ or feparare i (I fpeak, Sirs, to the afore- faid Scribe.) This breach, or ieparation be upon thee, therefore his name was called Pbares, 3nd fo thy name Pha- 6Vv.38.2p; rife. But now laftly, why Hypocrite ? why this followeth from the two other, as the conclufion from the two pr*~ mifes • a Scribe^ a Pharife , therefore an Hypocrite : befides, -&ptfflfc you know the word (Hypocrite) is taken from the ft age flayer and aftour^who ?TF^?3 judgeth ^nd efteemcth himfelf to be a perfon, as a King, or 3 Captain, which he is not, and scleth it fo, 35 if he were : And fo my Scribe and Pharifee is alfo Hypocrite, as, who fecms , and deems himfelf to be a Preacher, and a Dipper, which he is nof> neither of the two Perfons, or Officers, yet taketh upon himfelf, and acleth, or rather playcth, as if he were ei- ther, or both. And now (learned and loving Sirs,) give me your p3- timce for a word, about the Dedication of this my anfwer, and The Authors Epiflle ~ SdTwiil lcavcToulh^crc. I (hall deal clearly with you, and jell y ou all than; m gpv ^ unto ^ . fo bc againftthePhiliftines ,andiorhi3 people of Ifrael ;Co I have Dedicated this my an'fwcr (my firft-born and eldeft iflue of this kiodc) unto you , (as to indearand ingratiate my felfunto you, appearing in your ("as well as my own) defence (it being the joync truth, and common falvation fade 3. I write of, and fo for) to cntereffc and engage (fo far as I may bc bold,) fome of you, bappily,or fomc one of you, at leaft,to thepurfuite and profecution of this , one of the Lords , and his truths battels , even unto a glorious victory, (asyoucanwclldoit:) and fo to the patronage and protection of this my but skirmim ng velitation, fo far as it holdeth forth, the truth and faith once de- liveredunto the Saints , earnejlly and ever to be contend- ed for againfl: the Scribes , Pharifes , Hypocrites , this fwarm of the old Africane Wafpcs , and Egyptian Flies, (blown over into the Europa?an,and brought hither into our Britannical Coafts, by I know not what ftrong & crbfle windes) who will be,(I know) humming and buz- zing about me,flutirir}gand fly-blowing this my anfwer, & putting forth fome of their flings againft it : (fo being crafty ! caught yon with guile. This, of Dedication (as the 2 O.i 2.16. Apoftle 1 peaks in a like cafe.) As for my felf, I evidently for fee, and fentlbly perceive, that I fliall not be in life, or if fo, in ftrcngth to give them a Counter- blaft,and Retor- ilon$ or the truth, any re-inforctng, or re-eftablifliinf, (as whoamcompafled abour, and within, with many in- £ Cor.i.p. firmities of body (befides the difeafc of old age) and have the fentence of death in my felf, which I lookdayly when it fliall be executed on me, by the will of God:) yea, and it is full time for me to lay down Armes, bein^ a O.i .9. * not to the Reader ^ namd wsSm&m *• not oncly come to a Sexagenary Souldicr of Chrift,Hebt2,\0, {the Captain of our f ah at ion) and fo free from the wars, but a good way patted beyond a Septuagene , and fo free among the dead or dying, as David fpeakech, ?[<*!$%. 5, ( Mam life being threescore years and ten , as the fame Br , faith. f Pf<9o.io; Wherefore worthy Sirs, ye, whoft brea(ls are full of i0y2t milk and jour bones moijlened with marrow, (as Job fpeak- *2^' eth) who are of lively and lufty bodies, vigorous and ftrong brains , efpecially of good and zealous hearts, Be valiant for the truth^ upon the earth (this chiefly which you ler.g^t breath and live on) Arife, and (hew your felves abioad in defence of it , and as Abraham drove away the fowls that Gcn e JtI f e me down upon his facrifice , fo flap off the flies , that come up againft our Divine Sacrifices, Sacraments, and other Services of God, fentin (raoft likely) fromf^tf Cod of Flies, and the Prince that ruleth in the airt and Eph,2.2* goeth to and fro in the earth , walking up and down in it l°b 1.7. (as he hath done in our Englifh earth , very much of!ate)Jand as thcyufe todifperfcawafpsneft, focaftin gmongft them fome of your Hot waters, your %eal of God which is according to knowledge ,wherby the wings of their Rm*1 °*a» erroneous and violent opinions, that fpread out and flic a- bout, may flack and flag, and the flings of their ma- litious and virulent tongues may be dulled and blunted. For Iwifb not any theleaft hurt to their pcrfons and livclyhoods , nor do I. defire , that any of the hairs of their heads, (which I know, are all numbred) fhould be jifattl0 ^ diminifhed and fall totheground without their Father: but this I both wifh and defire that all the Herefies of their heads (which are a Number and many, fcarcc to be numbred, for that their New Light ever is leading of them into a new darkneffe) might fall to the ground, and be extinguifhed by the will and pleafure of God our c Fa. The Authors Eft file Father, and by the skill and Learning of you, my bre- thren ; and by power and authority of our ^uperiour Migiftratesand Patriots, Either putting a hook into their I fa "7 20 mftriHsi an& * bridle in their lips > and turning them (but fafe in their perfons and proprieties) hack fa the way they ame, unto their Ley den from London , and unto their tjMunfttr from Weftmin(ler , and unto their Africk , or whether (theypleafe) from Europe, or but England: or Me 13. t clfe fo yoking and ringling the wild Boars amongft them , who foam out their ownjhame ejr rage againft us Minifters, and the Ordinances, that their mouths may be ftopt from railing, and their fnouts from rooting-, that they may mj 5 not break through the hedges, ordown^n;^ of the vineyard of the Lord, toeatupthefweet Grapes' (of our Truths) to pluck of thepkafant plants (of our children) to deftroy> at leaft to dilcountcnance, the painfull Vint- dreffers (of our Minifters) and fo at laft to lay wild md waft, the whole vineyard of our flourishing Church of England. Jfyou now i (my fellow- Collegiates , and Minifters efpccially) Altogether hold your peace at this time, there Efihr^,i^ [hall come enlargement and deliverance from another place, from forreign and out-landilh Mioifteries and Univcrfi- 3*1 o. ties, ( he whofaidto the North give up, and to the South kcip not back, bring my fens from far, can and will afar off raiic up Patrons of his Church and truth) and you and your fathers houfes {ball be destroyed (foitmay be, if it be not fo in part already) yea you and your Mothers houfes too fhall be deftroyed (this is that, is now aimed at by them, and projected. Andwhoknoweth whether 'you art come to thellnivcrfl- ty, to the Miniftery, to the Reclory , for fuch a time as this, wherein all thefe are in hazard, and under tht Candle , byreafon of Haman tbt Agagittthtftws tntmy : I mean to the Reader, I mean not a man, not any fingle man in the world, but the double men of this world, the Johns of Leydens^ and the Nicks of Manlier, and all thofe other names of other Towns and Cities, who aretheMinifters enemies, the Universities enemies, the Church of Englands ene- mies , and who already have boughr us and fold us in part, and intend the whole Purchafe and Alienation of all is ours, and would afore now have grafped it into their Sacrilegious hands, but that they cannot yet, (and never may they (I pray) never (hall they (1 hope) get a "Decree and vote for the fame. Now therefore, (learned and zealous Sirs) feeing ^«r hearts are enduing of good matter sjn your ftudies &clofcts, Let your tongues be the fens of ready writers, and your pens ^et the gathering of the people be. Yea, Let the Lord, the God of the Spirits of all fit fl), Num. 27, 17 fet men (and Ministers efpechlly) over the Congregati- ons, which may go out before them, and which may go in before them, and which may lead them out, and which may lead them in, that the Congregations of the Lord, be not as fhetp which have no (hepberds: And let the Itnm an 1 Exo.2$tic»the 7bummim3 Lights and Perfections be with the holy J)eut,-tf. 8. Tribe, and he in their breafts and hearts, when they go in before the Lord, and come out unto the people, and let £. , them be the Chariots oflfrael- England , and the horfe- ' #I3* t men thereof ', Let three fcore valiant men of the valiant of rl fra- el- England^* About Solomons bed,a\\ holding Swords^ (the t^^.37' Swords eft he Spirit) being expert in warre, every fine ha- ving his Sword upon his thigh , becanfe of the fear of the nighty of errour and ignorance, and the danger of the darkneffey of feds and herefies, yea, let them put on the Eph%4l\it whole Armour of God , and war after the Spirit, and lee the weapons of their warfare be net carnally but mighty through to the Header. through God, to the fulling down the Hrong holds of Sa 2O.I0. 3. tan, and cajling down imaginations of Se&aries, and eve- 5*5* ry high thing of prefumption , and proud Innovation, that exalteth it felf again fl the knowledge* of God, and bringing into captivity every thought of rebellious fchifme and hcrefic, to the obedience of Chritt and his truth. I have done , and fhall now return unto my former me- ditations of , and preparations for another Enemy , and my laft Enemy too, which is death -y And (bill now// * cV. 15.26 down frit (or rather now at laft) and confalt with my felf, Lt*ke 14.2 1. and with fomealfoofyou (my brethren)in your book ?, 9rf£»^.4» but efpecially with God, in His Book, the Holy Scrip- *? ■ tures, which is Epiftolaquddam Dei omnipotentis ad fuam Vo%*r^[ T creaturam, as Gregory calleth it, or as Augufline more^ ] in $%* ex pre fly, Litter a Dei de V atria nojlra, unde peregrinamur, ad frat, in '* nobis tranfmiff*,ut bene That great my fiery of godlinejfe without Contr over fie y and trw.iri . as CXpC<5tsng dayfy when the fame death shall come, and become my lafl friend on earth , and give me my tVritofeafe, which I (hall willingly cake, and chearful- Phil.1.23. ly embrace, as who am defirous t« dtp art , and to he AdatM^.whh Chrifl, which is far better^ who harh alio promifed to eafe all the weary & heavy laden that come unto him. The words that Epihanim took his leave in of the Pres- byters , and other Profeffours of Cyprus, after he had exhorted them to innocency of life , and cbnftancyto the Faith, and told them, that he muft (hortly be cal- led from hs labour on earth, and fettled in reft in hea- ven, and after he had prayed for them, they were thefe, Salvi eJtotejUii ; Epiphanius enim non but the Lord is faithfullt who (hall ftahlijh yout and keep you from evil , and I have confidence in the Lord, touching you , that you will do the the thing I have de fired of you. and e>chorred you unto.* Be ye therefore, as ma-CPhl.i, ny as be per feci, thus minded \ and if in this cr anything 1 5.) ye be otherwife minded, God fhall reveal even this , and that alfo unto you,and perfwade you thereunto, i_sfnd2Thefot 5, the Lord dire II your hearts, into the Love of God, and into the patient waiting for Chrifl, Beheld (faith his mouth from that Mount above) IRcv.i2> *2- come quickly, and my Reward is with me. Let all our-^.2*.20* hearts from thefc Vallies beneath ccchoback, and re - found or refpond l^/»w, Even ft come Lord $efus,eome quickly. An humble fervant ofchrifi, From much-Leigh s Par- and his Church, and your af- finage Juliltbei, 1656. fettionate Brother and fellow- Minifter ftjfry Wits, SIR, *$\ IVnderfiandthat yots have a defire to fee [owe writing from fome ofthoje that do feparate themfelvs from the corupt pra- ctifes of your Church (commonly called the Church of England} I call it your Shurch,for it is none efChrfis (fhurchjbecaufe (fhrifts Church is a fpiritual bittld-ng made up of ffintusJ perfons falr.t s by call ng, as appears by . Hebrews 3.6 . 1 fetter, 2, 5. Rom*\. 7. I (forinth,\.i% Ephefi.l. baft z.edby cue fpirlt into one body and made to dr'.ncl^into the fame fpiritt. I Corinth, 1 2. 13. and fuch . «fe nett the Members of your (fhurch, exept fwearers drunckjrds lyers mockers and fc of ers and fuch like, are fitch, and then your (fhurch abounds trvo much, there may be a divil m Chrlft Chuch as wo* Judas but they are not all, (or at the be ft) the mo ft of them Little better then Devils m there livs andconverfatlons, there may be hypocrits in Chrift's (fhurch , but Itt is not made up of hips- cr'ts as your Church is, There may be fome in Chrift's Church thatt may fall into fome groffe fins , but they do not make it there trade to aft fin and profannes as the mojt of the members of your national and perochiall (fhurch doth in a -word In Chrift's (fhurch the Devlll may have his Chappe/ , but I could rvifh that God may find anough in your Church to make's a Chappelofj for I am afrayd that your ownconfcience will tell you[if you wouldtake but a ftricj^ veiw over your parifh Churches') that you have but a very few that are fit vcffels for there ma ft ers ufe and fo not fit members of Chrift's Church, which is called his body ephefiuns. 5.23.30. / fay lil^e wife we feparate but from the coruptions of this your (thoutrh falcely) called Church, for what ever is of Godamongft you we defire to own for what ever fcandalls and reproches are caft upon us by evilons we are inthe the prefence of the Lord and in the entegntie of our harts we defire to owne all (and no more then all) the ways praElifes and ordy nances of our Lord lefus Chrlft according to there primitive Inftiitttion, Andbecayfe there is fome d'ference between yon and us, about the Inflitutions of (fhrlft and perticulerly about babtifme and becaufe you have de fired to heere from fome of us fqmethmg concerning that poynt althgttgh I do not altogether approve of this way of writ tin g becaufe it is two privet; exept it might be comunicated to jmblicjxe veiwfor / would wilhncr- ly have others the better for what Jpjall (through the ftrenvth of [*] Ckrifi) Chriff) fay for that good and old way and prattife of Chrifl and his defciples {left for m to follow^ I £orinth 1 1. I ,) of babtiz,ing of beleivers and therefore I (ball comit the lejfe to Jnck^ and papper onely I (ball define you if yon pleafe to Anfwsr thefe few quemes by plain Anddirett Scriptures, I . Firfl of all whether the comands of fchrifl and the exernplar'ie praBifes of the Apo flies and Defciples of Chrifl written in the new flement are not written for our learning and Imitation, z. Secondly whether we may add too or detraChfrom thefe Co- mands and examples of Chrifl and defciples at ourpleafure with- out great fin. 3. 'thirdly whether the Comands of Chrifl and his Apo flies joy nedwith there examples and prattifes are nott fuficient for our Rule and direction without the tradition and Inventions of men. 4. Fourthly whether that Chrifl lefus is not as faith full over his houfe as afonne in giving them clear directions how to biuld his houfle & of what met eri alls asAfofej was tn the houfe as a fervant, \ly% Whether any thing concerning the worfkipp of God in the Law given to the Jews was biultupwhh arguments and darkjque* flionable confequences contrary tocomandgivenby Mofes^or Sollo- mon. 6, Sixtly whether we have more power to biuld Chrifl s Spirit tual houfe under the gofpell by arguments and confequences then the lews had there temporall and typical! houfes under the law con' trMtry to comand given forth att the firfl, 7. Sevently whether any thing performed by man in thewor- ftp of God will be exepted of God exept we have a plain word to Warrant the fame^which if it may I would de fire to know of yon upon what account he may performe it foe as thai it may be exepted feeing he hath not word to warrant it. And if he may doe nothing with out a warrant from the word of God as furly he may not , / would defire to know of you what word or warrant you cann give from the words of (fhrifl (for thefe your pralYifes) whofe M'wiflers youpret?ndto be. 1. For forcingofmaintainancefrom thofe that are not willing to pay it it going agaynfl there Confcience and Suing them at the Liw to recover them, 2, For your owning of the min'flry of the go sj ell of Chrifl upon an account of your humane learnino- arts andfcynces and ether^ a- qtt'red quired farts received from Oxford or (Cambridge orfuch like [cools of humane learning, 3. What warrant you have from the words of Chrifl for your babtiz.ing of Infants before they do attully beleeve. 4. What warrant youhave from the words of Chrifi for ad- mitting ofperfons to the Lords Supper before they are b abused ac- cording to Chrl ft s Inftitution and holding forth the workj of holy- xcjfe toward Gcd and Right eoufnes towards men in a word before they are born of waiter and of the fpirrit or at left foe fire at man can \udge them fo to be* 5. What warrant you have from the word of God to own your felves Paftors of Churches whjleft you performenotthofe dutys which are enjoy nd to all Paftors of Churches by Chrift and the A- poftles of Chriftyin Math.io.S. AH's 20.28, 31,33,34,3 5. \ Fet- ter 5.2.3. 6. What warrant jou have from the fame Rule to force any in' to obedience toyourprattifes whether they will or no, %.•> Eight ly the eight query u whether it is not the dutie of you and and we and all men to walk, in exaSl obedience to all the (fo- mands of Chrift as he hath given us Comandment with out fetting of our polls to Gods poft I meane our envent'ions by the Lords Comand. 9. Ninthly whether you and we are net bound to federate from thefe whoe feperatethemfelvs from the wayes praftifes ordy nances andcomands of the Lord lefts* Chr'tft and his Apoftles as tlyfy ly •written in the word ofGod» 1 g, f Tenthly whether that prattife in DoUrine or worjhlp which hath not a word to warrant it I mean an exprejfe word either of co- mand or example from Chrift or his Apoftes ( though never foe fay rely backt by Reafon or Arguments J is to be praQ'tfed by the fonnes & daughters of men which mu ft give an account of all there anions to him whoe fercheth the hart and tryeth the Raynes and will give to every one according as his worl^fhall be. i 1. Eleventhly whether babtifme maketh a man or a woemm a(fhriftian without fayth and following of Chrift in all his comand andftepps left upon record for our Imitation, 12. Twelfly whether the comands and examples of Chrift and his Apoftles are are not lafting till his fecond coming and fo in as great force to us as to thefe unto whom fir ft they were given 9 and if 1*1 * **/' any are not lafting till the end of the world I defire to know of you wh'-ch they are and if all are la fling fo long , then I would defire to know why they are not practiced as they ought to be and whatt ex- cufe we fh*U have att the great day for not obeying of them, 13. Whether that the babtiz>'wg of believers is not the comand of Chrift prattiftd by the Affiles yea or no and left upon record for Mi to follow and Imitate till his fecond coming, 14, whether that any plain Injunction or comand in fcripture doth not (forks time) bar any perfon from the praclifing of any thing to the contrary although he hath no expreffe word that bids him that he (hall not do the contrary as for example whether that comand mentioned in Mathew the 7th, I2,rv/;cr (fhrift bids his people that they foould do the fame things to others thai they would have others d&e unto them , doth not this enjoy ns them that they fhall not doe thefe thine s unto others that they would not have others do unto them (eh s, although there is noe fuch word in Scripture and whether all other comanas m the Gofpelare not of the fame nature^ Chrift lefw doth not fay unto his Difciples in Iolpn the 1 4, 1 5 . that if you love me doe nothing contrary to my comands , but if you love me then keep my Comandements all true, Thefe queryes I have thought good to put to youandfthey are my judgement , and if you cann contradict them by playne Scripture I fit. ill be glad to fee it , if not then acknowledge the truth avd have of all thofe your eroniowspralhfes aforementioned and glori- fte God by fubm'tting unto the truth as it came from the mouth of Chrift andhu Apoftles^ as they did of whom the Scripture bareth Recrrd in Luke 7 .'20. tJMoreperttculerly about the DoBrine ofb brifme, I . Conjidcr thefe Arguments proved by clear and plain Scripture coxfider that the DoBrine of infants babtifme it over through s the nature of the Covenant of grace and the whoe (jcfpel of (fhrift be- caufe the Covenant of grace and the Go fyel of 'Chrift yft and up- on the account of faith aUual in there one perfon s as appears in lohn %.?,6%andIohn 5.-4. But infants babtifme ftands upon the account of the faith in there parents or furties ( although they have none for themfelvsJ and fo mak^th faith void and unneftfery totheperttonputioroftheCove- venant * Galations 3. 1 7,1 8. and foe it over throws the nature of the Covenant of grace, a'. Con- 1. Conftder that infants babtifme it over threw s the nature of the ft ate ofChrlft true v'ifible C hurch under the Gofpel ' becaufe the nature of Chrifts truevifible Church under the Gofpel c on ft ft s of Saints by calllng,'s\om,\ .7 . 1 (for ,\.2. called by the word of the Gofpel bj which [mortal feed they are made new Creatures by tbz btniftofregeneration^john^.^. I Pet.1.2^* or at left fo fare as the M nefters of babtifme can judge Ph'dllppians 1 .6.7. 1 Cor. 1 , 2. Rom. 1 .7.8. but Infants babt.z^me is grounded up m the relation they have to 1 he (fhurch by generation oneiy or by the meer proftffion of faith and repentance in the parents or furtyes and therfore It over through s the nature of for; ft true vifiblt Church under the Gofpel. 3, (founder that Infants babtifme it ever throughs the end. for wh.ch true babtifme wasappoyntedfor tkechelfe end of L hrftsfrite babtifme of believers it was to d ' ftrngul(b the true Chu xh from the world Coll 2.12, Compared with v ers 20, Gall. ^26 2-j % Acts 2*41. But Infants babtifme it overthrows this d.ft'mtMon becaufe ai are admitted in by it and no dlftlntlion made. 4. (fonfider that Infants babtifme it over throws, and prevents that babtifme that is exprefly commanded in Scripture, Becaufc the babtefme of beleevers fis oncly exprefly comanded In Scripture J or Deaplesy Mathew 28.19. God teach or make cDefci~ pies all Nations babiizSwg them in the name of the father fonne and holyGft,Marl^z6 l$.John^. 12. Acts '2.38.41 Acts 8 37.8. therefore Infants babtifme it over throws this expreff.ly comanded babifme of beleevers & fo fkewife it prevents the old admin 'fir -ation of this exprefly comanded babtlz,'ng of beleevers becaufe moftofper^ fons loskjipon themfelvs as babtiz,ed in there Infancie and fo nc ver locl^ after the comand ofChrift to be babtiz,ed when they beel. eve, Lhcfe confederations considered without afelfi(hprcjuducia!l fp'r't and with a fpirit wiling to be gu'ded by the fpirit of the Lord ac- cording to his word of truths and the Scriptures truly red and Inter - pretedby the fplrr'n of the Lord which are quoatedto prove the afer- tlons.lt willapeare to every honeft andunby affed fpiritt that 'infant habtiz*m is agreate and a dangerous err our for ever to be rebelled of every Soul that expects falvat'on by Iefus Chrift. fyind that the Dottrine of babtlz,'ng of bdeevercsU a truth for ever to bee praclifedby every fuch foul, and that not left at liberty :? bee practiced or not^ to doe it or to lett it allone confidering, 1 . It is the fir ft great ordy nance of the New Trfta-nent apoynPed for beleevers^ Math, 28.1^, Mark^ 16.16. and they comanded and -, [*] 3 enjoyned exijoyned topraftife the fame Atis 2,-$%.Atts 8,38, Atts 10. 47* 48. Therefore for beleevers to neglect it, it will prove noekffe then contempt agaynft the authwltie of God hmifclf And then what k it for any man to oppofe and contemne it write and preach difpute and ffea\e againft- it judge yee, and judge Righteous judgement :for (jod Will. 2, To xegleB the fame of being babiiz^ed as beleevers is to d't~ fpife the Councell of the Lord and topratlife it is to luft'ifie God, Luckje 7 .2 9. 30, therefore it is not adutie to be done ,or left undone, tyind if to neglebh it is to dijpife the Councell of God as the holy Gh oft faith it is then what is it tofcorne it & count it an erronr and th+fe Heritrayls that praftife it out of obedience to Chrift judge ye* 3 , fVce neede to prattifc itt to confirme our faith in the remiffion of fmnes Alls 2.38. repent and be babtiz,ed in the name of the Lord for the remiffion of fmnes, therefore Arife why tarieft thou and be bfbtiiced and wajh away thy fmnes by calling upon the name of the Lord Alls 22.16. therfore it is not to be done or left undone at our pleafure, now confider what fmnes your Infant babti&me doth wa(h away orprefent remjjion of judge yea* 4, Neither may any lawfully be admitted members of any vifi- ble Church with out it \ (forinth 1 2.1 3. Galat. 3.26.27, it beino- the firft ordy nance which the d:fcyples of Chrtfi are diftinguifhed from the reft cf the world Coll, 2 .12.20. and therefore not to be ad- mittedto any Gofpelprlvledge without it Now what an errouryou are in, and what fmyoucomitt againfl: the comands of ^hrift,whoe admitt members with out it judge yea, \s4nd therefore, if a Church Miniftrie or any of the priveledgs of a Church be neceffarie then is babtifme of beltvers necefjary by which we may lawfully come to bepertahers of all thofepriviledges as is to be had in a Church flat e as is by Chrift fett up for the or~ dering and dfpofwg of all the lawfull things of£hrift lefusm 7'beref ore whofoever would have faith to thrive and grow lett not the Coman dements of (fhrift Iefus be flighted and disregarded, if foe Chrift will ftght and difregard allthofe as doe fo for he that is afyamedof theComands of Chvfty (fhriftwillbe ajhamedofhim heee After beforehis heavenly father, Math .1 0.33. huke 9,26. 0^^8.38. thofe that are planted in the ho ufe of the Lord jhaft florifh if. the Courts of our God Pfalm 92,13. Some Some considerations upon ACts 2.5 p. I. Confider that fucha being in the covenant as wake th faith void is no true being , but that being in the Covenant "which is con- cluded from the faith oftheparrents is fuch a being as maketh faith void, Therefore no true be.ng. That this is fo I prove. 1. That tytle were by any per Jon hath once a being in the Cove- nant by the fame he may remayn in it for ever , now then if any owne hath fuch a tytle as to be with in the (fovtnant by beeing the fed of the faith full he may remain in it for ever and fo needs no faith of his -owne. And fo by the fame reafon one may all may and feeing all be the children of Abraham or Noah which ware faith- fully all are m the Covenant and foe faythneedleffe in the world, 2. Confider that fuch an expofition as over throws the promt fey lhat cannot be a true expo fit ion of the text but fuch as expound a be ng in the Covenant from faith full parents over throws the pro- Wife, ; . Therefore this expofition )s no true expofition, for the promt fe is Upon the account offiyth in our own per {on s and not In ourp.irrents as appears : in Habbuckucc,2,q, Compared with Iohn 3.36. And that ttt doth over throw the promt fe I further prove , becaufe no- thing Anfweres the promt fe but faith and if faith be needless then the promfe is needleffe If any will fay the parrents may believe for ther Children and foe thiere fayth will Anfwer the promife, I An- fwer, fir f 1, iheText doth not fay the promife is made toyou in the be- half of your Children , but 10 you and to your Children and therefore youmufi beleeve for your felvs and they forthemfehs or elec nether you nor they do Anfwtr the promlfe, 2. Suppofe it ware fo lhat theprom'ifes mare made to the faith- full in the be half of there Children and they concluded to be in the Covenant therby^ Then either God doth perform his promife m fa- ving all the Children of thofe faithful! parents, according to his Covenant, or elce he breaks his Covenant made to thofe parents and doth not per for me itt his promlfe, either of which perticuleres no man which is in his right wttts will dare to Afirm and therefore this expofition (namely that Children have any right to the Cove- nant by vertue of the faith of there parents or to any prive ledge of the Covenant by vertus of the fa me is a f alee expofition ef the Text, and a dreftlng of it* lefx Iefiu faith yea doe err e not knowing the Script urs nor the power of God , Mat hew 2 2. 29. 1 am the God of Abraham and of lfack^ and of Jacob : god is not the god of the dead but of the liv.ng, verce 3 2. Conjider thefe things J pray with a fixate eye taming at gods glorj and thy neighbours good and Anfwer thefe confidtrations by plain and dereft Scripture if you can, or elce leave of tvrefiin* the Scriptursto your own ends (f.fnot d:firntlim ) An Exposition according to the mindc of the holy Ghoft in that Scripture,i Corinthians 7.14, f0l- theunbclceving hut- band isfanctiried by the believing wife,and the unbelie- ving wif -' is fan&yficd by the beieeving husband,elce ware yout Children unclcane but now are they holly Cor clean) which is opofue to uncleannes. This Script are is owne of the ma'ne props that Mr, We'.nellbiuld- eth his infant babtifme upon, grounding from hence that Children are holy becaufe there father and there mother are lawfully mariedL for that is the Apofils meaning in this text namely the ho hues of theQhy Id or uncleannes of it according to the lawfulnes or unlaw f nines of the mariedge of the parents , and foe the the unbelevinr htuband or wife is fanilyfiedby the btlevmg husband or wife be- ing lawfully marid, as the holy ghofi faith unto the pure al thinas aye pure lytus I. I 5. Row. 14. 20. and fee anmpure or unbelee- ling wife' or (fhild is fan&yfedorpMre,to the pure or bcltuj)x Butt I fhould gladly, fee better fruitefrom you therefore I pray Confider the word of the Apo file Paully 1 £orinth 2.17. for we are not as many which Corupt (or deale deceiptfully with) the word but as of fencer ky but as of god in the fight of god fpeaf^wem Chrifi and Chapt„^. verfe 1, but have renounced the hidden things ofdis honefiy and walling in Craftynes not handling the word of God deceitfully but by manife fiat ion of the truth Comend'mg our Selvs to every mans Conference in the fight of god Comparing Spi- ritual things with a Spirittually Scripture with Scripts for one Scr pture is the beft interpreter of another. There f re I would ex- treat you to lay afyde allfelfe ends and byrefpetls and Confider fe- rioufiythe things and words of god fpotyn by the Spirit t of God in the Scripturs which ware all written for our learning and Imitati- on and Confider in the fear e pf God all thofe Scripturs that are be- fore fpoken of and although ( for want of ty me) I have not written all the the words of all the Scripturs that are quoatedyett 1 would intreate you to lookethem andferioufly to weigh them , thatwherin I have erred you may Informe meet by plain Script ure^ Andwherin the truth doth Appeare (as I am finfident he are is nothing Aferted nor queared but will now appeare a truth proved by Scripture and likpvife will appeare a truth att the greate day) y.oumay lye downe before- before itt and Stoope too it for now you are enformed and foe cannot pleads? Ignorance before the Lord att hii appearing when he will re- ward every orvne according to his wor\ And if you cann Anfwer thefe quearies And Confederations by playn Scripture I pray doe or elce hold your peace and leave of your vnwarantable praflifes I fay by playne Scripture or at lea ft by Arguments proved by playne and derel~h Scripture Rightly enterpretcd, And to this end Confeder the words of lob , and weigh them in ann even andequall ballance lob, 6.24,2 5. verfes, leach me And I will hold my tongue and caufe me to under ft and where'tn I have erred, how forcable are Right words but what doth your arguins {or Arguments) reprove doe ye Imagine to reprove words, like wife I would entreateyou to Qonfeder thefe Scriptui'f, therefore 1 fayd furely they are poorey they are foolish for they know not the way of the lord nor the Judgments of there god Ieremy 5.4. thusfayth the lord Concerning the prophets that make my people to err that byte with there teeth A nd Cry peace And.he that putteth not into there mouth they even prepare -warraga'mft them Micha.2,%, the heads thereof Judge for re- ward and the preift thereof teach for hyre and the prophetts there' of devinefsr money yett will they leane upon the lord and fay is mt the lord Among ft m none evil cann come unto us therefore (ball Zyon for your fakes be plowed &c. verce 1 1 . 1 2 . Oh my people they which leade the caufe the to err And deiroy the way of thy paths what meane you that you beate my people to peices and grind the face of the poore faith the Lord E fay 3.12,1 5 .,«/<£ 'wonder full and horible ii comtted in the land the prophets prophefiefalcely and the frieft bare Rule by there meanes and my people love to have it foe e. John Wele*. VINDICATION O F T H E Church of England Received two fheets of paper from you in the end of November 1655. unto which 1 return- ed this An(wer in. prefenr , that you took me in a cold Quarter of the year, & amongft the ftiorteft dayes, wherein my old , and o- therwife infirm body could not, norfhould fet it felf upon any new troublefomc bufinefles, and incura- berancesmore than did neceilarily ly upon me} But when the weather grew warmer , and the dayes toj be of a better length , I would anfwer you fully •• And fo truely, I did you and your Letter a courtefie , in letting your papers ly a cool- ing all Winter, which otherwife, being fofull of heat and wilde fire, might have burnt thcmfelves, and would alfo have inflamed me, and my quill, (o that they woi Id have come fnddenly to afhes; and fo I think ftill, they will at laft notwichftanding their prefervation this while. Now there- fore, though your many, and manifold wilde and wandering Queres and Difcourfes might juftly take upawholeSum- B mers Iheocctftw of this Aifcourft. mers work and ftudy to return unto you, from a Minifter who hath dayly and weekly more ferious imp]oyment, I do anfwer, Firft , as to my defire of feeing jome writing from fome of the jeyartti&n , which you mention as the occasion pf your writing to me, you are miftaken at the firft letting put ; and this your errour in the very beginning , is but a (ore prefageof many more to follow in the midway and all along, even to the end:ideiired it not, neither needed to have defired that, as who have long ago Teen divers writings from fome of them, (once feeing of which is enough,) my defire was,if any,iuch were, (when,there was anothers defire that I would difcourfe with you), toiee rather fome wriung from your felfonely,and that, becaiife you had in part , or Woulahave (educed a Parifhfoner of mine from presenting her Childe to baptifme, and had (I perceived) infufed (ome evil thoughts and affedions into her againft the Mjniftry of the Church olEngUnd, otherwife I Ihonid not have -me died with you, nor ftretched my felf beyond^my mea(ure,to have reached unto you, and to have boafted in anothers line , as you do ; but fiiould have referred you over to my reverend brother, your Minifter, where you have your refidence, and of whom you have received your ftrong meat (if you have any) (/f not your Milk alfo) to have refuted your errours,and to have reduced you as his ftraying fheep (though of late you take upon you to be a fhephcard and lift up your Crook , a- gainft his ftreightand right (taffe.. And whereas I looked for, but your Tenets &c refolutions about baptifme, (the matter onely in queftion,) you put. quaeres to me of every thing that was in your heart, when your pen was in your hand, as if with the Qtieen of Sheba^ . you came, or fent to prove me with hard queftionv, efpecial- ly about the Church of Ghrift and his Ordinances. ">Jow> I defireda writing from you hereabouts as having obferved orall dilcourfes and dilputes (for -thempft part) through the heatandpaflionsof the parties^ do vanifh away and end in fmoak,and arefubjeft to the miftakes and milreports of the auditors, according to their partial apprelicnfioos^or. inclina- tions : You (towards the end of yonrfirfi page) do not altogt* ther approve of this way of writing 7 , becanfe it is too private, ex- cept ■*■ «<■■*■» ■ ■' ■■ ■ The g$od Old way, & c. $ cept it might be communicated to publickjvicw \for ym would wil- lingly have others the better 9 for what you fhdl (through the firength of Chrift) fejifw that good and old way and practice of Chrift and his 'Difciples left for us to follow,) But, Sir, Let me as a friend advife you, to live and ly fttli In private, and not to communicate your writings, (if they fhali be all, like this you write to me) to publickview, leaft others be iktlc the. better, and fome the worle for what you fay } for you fay here nothing for the good and old way of Chrift and his Difciples, left for us to follow, and therefore you have not faid it, through the ftrength of Chrift, but through the im- pocency rather , of your unchriftian heat, or zeal without knowledge, or Charity. As I fhall clearly fticw, as I follow your writing* For i. the good and old way of Chrift and his DXciplcs the Churchof England were turned 2 0.27. Harlot, and were fo and fo (as you Cay,) yet there is a Text that warrants, you no farther than.** plead with your mother , jjofeaia. (and not to rail upon her) you out oi duty as a Son may • B z plead Railing upm the Church of England, plead with your mother, if corrupted *, but you are not out of envy to revile her as a miicreant r Even the idolatrous Church oilfrael: the Prophet calls, and owned, and efteerri* ed as mother 8c Church ; and much more ought the Church of£»£/W,which isachaftc and found worfhipperof God in fpirit and truth , to be called and accounted as your mother, ind (b would be, as it ihould be , of yau, but that you- have oft your wits as well as«your manners. For I will not take no* :ice of what you fp t out,of mine 8c other Parochial Church- * es -• The daughter is not abovethe mother; it is enough for u me daughter that fhe be as her mother: If they haye called lt the mother of the houfc Belziebub ,.how much more (hall **> cney call them of her hou(hold:Neither do you only lill out your tongue, againft the corruptions and corrupt praftifes of our Church ot England, (though twice in the firft page you affirm fo much J but your vhulent w^ords enter even into her bowels, tothe death and deftruaion of her vital fpirits : wirncfle your own words,for no body elfe (Ithink) will own rhem- It is none of Qhrifks Church's the Members of your Qhurch art not the Members of Chrifts Church '.They are not alitor at the befty the mo ft of them Ihtle better than Devils in their lifes ' , (yon wouUwrite,Stryare they not alitor elfe there isyas no charity yor rea- fon^fo nofenfe , nor your own meaning in your words, )y our Church is made up of Hypocrites : The meft of the Members of jour Na± tionaiand Varochtal Church mal^e it their trade to all: Jin and pro* phanenejfe : My purpote is not to follow you in this new and bad way of yours, which is railing and reviling (none of Chrifts , none of the Difciples, their old and good way ) fl will follow them in their good and old way, and will not render evil for evil, or railing for railing, i Pet,3.$iand will' onely with Chrift turn and rebnkeyoulaying^, ;^ know not what manner fp'rit you are of y Lukg 9* 55. if you can write thus in cool bk>ud,unprovokedj what would you fay in a hot d;fpute,when Y°u ftiould be pinched?Surely you would' : call for fire down from heaven to confume us,8c our Church. Nay, 1 will not rebuke you ; but committing our felves and our cafe (with our Savour Chrift , as before J to him that judgeth righteoufly, I fay onely , the Lord rebuke thee. Even ) Michael Railing ufon the Church ^/England. LflMhael the Arch- Angel when contending with the Devil. He ditputed about the body of Mofes, durft not bring againft him a railing acculation, Judeg.verf, nor will I bring any fuch againft yoiyhough contending with you, and dilpuring about the body of Chriit, the Church ; but will oncly (ay again , the Lord rebuke thee , for whom haft thou reproached and blafphemed, againft whom haft than exalted thy voice , and lifted up thy tongue on high > even* again ft the holy one of lfrael, in his Church and Members, in his word ana Ordinances, If a. 37.23. Haft thou not heard long ago how he hath done it, and of ancient times that he hath formed it ,verl. 26. Now hath he brought it to pafTe,that you Sir,(hould be,to lay wafte,a de- fenced (and ever defended ) Churchioto ruinous heaps, and to write foul , a fair , (and fo efteemed) fpoufe of thrift, into Antichriftian deformities , and Diabolical Impurities and Impieties* Brethren , if there be any amongft you, whofe fpirir, (ha- ving read and heard now, this Rabjhakeh, or Shimei) is hoc and incenfed within h\myt6 hy<>wb} (hodd this dead "Dogge {dead whileft he Uveth , is he, who livech in malice, as jhe who Uveth in pie a fur e) 1 Tim. 5. 6. Curfe my mother , the Church oiEnglandy let me go over , .and take of his head^ Sam. 16. 9. Ipray , be content, hold your hands howfoevcr , let loofe your tongues(jf you plea(e,)and fpeak in defence of her as I do. Behold,many of her (ons (and our fellow brethren) which came forth of her bowels, have (oughr,and do feek her life '•) How much more may this Benjamite (this left handed, and finifter one) do it, and mtke head againft all lfrael) Let him alone, S\tS,Jet him curfe, it may be that the Lord will lookyn our mothers affliction, and that the Lord wiH requite good for bis cur- ftngthuday, 1 Sam.i 6.12, Yea, and your mother too, Sir, (whatsoever you think , or fay of her) your Mother- Church may call to the Heavens to hear, and the earth to hearken , for ftte may (peak it, and doth , / have nourished and brought- up m Children, and they have rebelled again ftme, I(a*J .2, and m.iy do with your Letter zsHe&ekjah did with Senacheribs, [pread it before the Lord in his houfe,and pray , Ifi.tfi ,16.17. Incline thtne ear, O Lordy and hear, open thine eyes,0 Lord) and fee,and hear all the words of Senachcrib, which hath fent te reproach the E 3 #• 6 Railing upon the Church ^"England . living God and his Church, and fo I leave the railing part of your firffc page, and come to the reafoning part thereof, what is your reafon, that the fhurch of England « none of fhrifts Church ? becaufe ({ay you ) forty s Church ts a fpiri- tual budding , made up of fpiritual perfons bapttfed by one fpi~ rit into one body, and made to dr'mkjnto one fpir.it , and here you cite, Hebr. 3. 6. j Pet.2.5. Ephef. 5.aa» and *3. Rom. 1.7. 1 Cor.i.2* Ephef. 1. 1. 1 C©r. 12. 13. and fo infer, butfucb are not the Members of the Church of England : It Would be but a vain thing in me, to tell you, who are in your next leaf a Profdlour againft the liberal Arts &: Sciences,of your igno- no ranee and unskilfulnetfe of arguing and reafoning, Which is the work of Logick ; Therefore leaving out both here, and throughout your lheets,your irrationals and inconfequences, I will proceed in a plainer way with you ; and therein I gra- tifie you. " — - — .. ■ — — — ■ Sea. I- Of the Church of Etighnd. 1. Your bufineffe is to prove, that the Church of Eng- Und is not a particular vifiblc Church ofChrift rand to do this you bring in a defcription of the Catholick invifible Church ofChrift : we acknowledge of, the Church of Eng- land that it is not the fpiritual building made up of perfons baptized by one fpirit into one body : &c yet we affirm there are fome fuch in the Church of England, living (tones of that fpiritual building, and fpiritual Members of that myftical body. When you fay, fuch are not the Members of the Church ef England ;if you mean none, your meaning is bad, and your faying is taife ; and if you mean, fuch are nofall , both your faying and meaning are good and true ; it is granted, as being no way prejudicial to the being of the Church of • England, the Church ofChrift. 2. You heap up Texts of Scriptures (as the manner of your fide isj to amu(e and prcpofleile the Reader, but not to thepurpofe>#^.3A 1 Ptf.M. may belong to your defcri- ption of the Catholick invifible Church : For the better clear* irig hereof, know that the vifiblc Church is a mixt company con- The Church fl/England;* true viable Church \ confifting of diners forrs of people, good and bad,godly and wicked, Saints indeed , and linnets : and chat from hence do arife in Scripture different kinde of fpeeches,of, and con- cerning the Church, according as God in his word direð and intendech his fpeech to the godly and wicked in the Church, when to the wicked Cod bendeth and applieth his fpeeeh,teproving them,and denouncing judgements againft chem, becaufe of the multitude of (tich in the Church. He fpeaketh as if they were all wicked, and no godly in it, as Efa» f . 3 • V. 4. i o. Hracl hath not "knovtoy Ah Jin full Nation , a, people laden with iniquity ,zn& fo fee J and with relation had to them of the invifible Church ? And another is this,that thole things which bjwhe Apoftle are fpoken in a certain re(pe&, and of a part otthe vifibie Church , you underftand (imply and of the whole vifibie Church ^ as if all the (peedies of Paul in his Epiflles writen to Church and Churches, were by him ■ fpoken and meant to all die Members of the vifibie Church, and were true of them. For fodoyounotalleadge many Texts, Row. 1. 7. 1 Cor.i.2.Eph. 1. 1. fpoken, and meant of Saint* indeed , whole hearts are purified by Faith, and the fpirit, who were but fome of thofe vifibie Churches, and of the invifible Church alfo, and fo conclude from them , that none but fuchare in a true vifibie Church* and fo, becaufe we are not all fuch> therefore ours is no true vifibie Church of England }whkh is fo abfurd an inference,that you your (elf (ec it by this time, I (hall not need to (hew it farther. Thus 8 the Church ^/England a true viftble&c. Thus yon deal with thofe words in the I Cer.12.13* and thofe words at the 27, verf. fpoken refpe&ively of the invi- iible Members of Chrill , which are but fome of that vifible Church, (by onefpirit b aft 1 fed all into one body, and made all to driuk^into one fpirit ) you apply them (imply, and abfolutely to all the Members of a vifible Church * and fo gather upon in, becaufc we of the Church of England sue not all fuch, therefore we are no true vifible Church of Chrift. Whereas both thefe (peeches cited by you,&: thofe above by me,M.i?. 1 Cor. 3. 17. and fo thofe (that maybeaddedX-l c«r.6.i5.£^.1«l3» and a number more, though written to vifibl- Churches , are not fpoken and meant (imply of the vifible Church, Sc fo of all the Members thereof , but of fome certain perfons in the in vifible Church: namely the ele6t and faithfuil,or if they are,or may be meant alio of the vifible Church, it muft be, (as I have hinted) in refpeft and relation to thefe. 3. You contradict your Xelfi for having (in youc kind) rea- soned, the Church of England co be none of Chrifts Church, becaufe the Members thereof are not fpiritualperfons, &c. but Swearers, Drunkards, Mocker , Scoffers, &c. you pre- sently add, there may be a Devtlin Chrifts Church ; there may be Hypocrites in Chrifts Church: very well,Hypocrites in Chrifts Church , and yet Chrifts Church ; wny not then Swearers and Drunkards^, in England^ and yet Chrifb Church? for Hypocrites are worfe perfons, more odious and hatefull to Chrift,and more inconfiftent with a Church and true Reli- gion : But if not Hypocrites (whom too many favour much and fide with more) yet (I am fure) the Devil is fo : and yet with you, it may be Chrifts Church > and a Devil in it not* withstanding : and why not Chrifts Church,if Lyars,S wear- ers, Drunkards,^ c, be in it? The Devil is a Lyar,and the father of it, a Swearer , and the father of it. Oh ! bat you add, the Church of England abounds with fitch j and they areyall the Members of?t9 little' better than Devils, It is made up of Hy- pocrites, they make it their trade to aft fin and prophanejfe. I confeffe, this is a Lamentation, and (hall be for a La- mentation, that the fins above mentioned, do fo abound in the Church of EngUnd; but if they be able to unchurch Eug- land} J he Church ^/"England, a true vifible Church, 9 land, they may unchurch alfo all the World, even your (ele£fc Sect, and New-found Ifland, which is not fo pure, but that fome of thofe grofle fins (co fay no more) maybefcenin fome of you : But you forget your felf, Sir, we arc difcour- fing,not'of Pure, but True Churches , when our Saviour Chnlt foretold it , and lamented over it, that iniquity ihould abound in the later dayes of the World, (which arc now fallen upon us) did he mean, or can you gather hence, that there fliould be no Churches of Chrift in the latter dayes of the World ? Again , if the being of fuch iniquities in a Church of Chriff, doth not abrogate the name,oraboliih the nature of a Church of Chrift. (I fpeak ftill of a vifible Church, whether particular, or univerCal,) why then the^ more being of fuch , or the being of more fuch,cannoc do it. You fay, that in Chrifts Church there may be Hypocrites, Hypocrites in the plural number,fo,they may be many,and abound : (yet Chrifts Church:) you fay there may be in Ch rifts Church, a Devil, in the lingular number : (I hope you are not an.enemy to all Grammer-School learning , as you are to all Univerfity Arts and Sciences for you have learned to read and write , though not fo good Englifli and fenfe as you would have done, if you had b^en awhile at ei- ther of the Vln'veriities.) But how know you, but that one . Devils Name may be Legion, Luke 8.30. and fomany Devils may be there, where you fuppofe but one, and yet Chrilts Church, or if but one, he will foon bring in feven other fpi- rits more wicked than himfelf* Atath.12.45* the feed of the Serpent is fruitfully and will quickly bring forth a generation of Vipers , thefc may "abound in a Church, and yet the Church of Chrift,whileft the feed of God abideth alfo there, and there is alfo a generation of the righteous. Laftly, I will now fpeak unto you, as one whom I have efteemed as a friend, and ftill account fuch (notwithftand- ing this entercourfe, or rather contra-courfc of Letters:) Let me defire you,to pull off the Wafp 8C its fting from your f ips, or to fpitout the Afpe and its poyfon from under your tongue » and to ufc no more fuch words of your mother , if not fo,of your fifter(Ghurch of England,) as thefe: {That it is madcup of Hypocrite s,that the y are all made ufofV'ivcls:) Put C on i o The Church of England a trtn vijible&c. I Pet.i^. on the Ornament of a meekjmd quiet fptrit, which is m the fight JR0W.14.4, of God of great p rice : who art thoathat judge ft another mans fer- vant ? to his ownmafttr he ftandeth,or fiUleth ; yearhe fhall be 1 Cor.A, 5, holden up^for God is able to make him fland : Therefore judge no- thing before the time, umill the Lord co.merwhoboth will bring ta light , the hidden things of dArkpejfe , and will make manifest the 2 lim,ltl9tcc#nfels of ' tht 'hearty and then Jhall 'every man, h&ve praifeofGod: Font he Lord knoweth, who are his : You do not know, who are his, who are die fpiritual perfons, or living ftones of that in' vifible building, who are baptifed by one fplra into one body, and are made to drinkjnto one ferity and are veffels ( of Honour ) fit for the maftersufe: The foundation of the Lordiftandethfurcy having this Seal, the Lord knoweth who are his. Do not you raife this foundation, nor pluck off this Seal, to peep into the Ark, and to piefume tcaknow, who are his, the Lord (onely_ I fayj knoweth, who are his : what know you, but that there are 7000 in the Church of England, as in the Church of J/- r^/, who are the Lords, and have not bowed the knee to Baal > our Saviour Chnft faid of John the Baptift , this is Elia^, Math. 11. t 4» you bear the fame name, and (if three Letters more were added and prefixed,) are of the fame pro- fcffion and pracl:ice,as I hear : and I Lee you are of the fpiric oiElias • you have been very- jealotu for ths Lord Cjodof Hofts, (and I cornriaend you for it) becaufe the Children of England have fbrfaken the Cevenam^c, but fay not farthe-r with him, . I even lonely am left to both of which you would go for great pretenders , allowing, (moll an end) none but Scripture names, yet here refuting them, but ofthi^more afterwards. But thefe four accepd- ons of the word Chwrdi,( hough. true, and ofufe elfewhere, are not pertinent here. Therefore i axld two more. TheChurchrin a Theological fenfe , Signifying a com- pany of people that arc called , or are to be called, 8c joyned together in iome ipir itual relation unto Go J, Is taken 1 .moft properly and ftri&ly for the whole company of the Elect, C a whether 1 2 Divers accept 10ns of the name Church&c. whether Jews, or Gentiles , as oppofed to the Reprobates : thus, Sfkef. •).%$& 5,27,32. Chr'ifi loved his Church , and gave himfclf for it, that he might clenfe it with the wafting of water by the -word : and fo alio, C°^°fl* l ^. He is the head of the bodyy the Church : This is called by oar ancient .Divines , the Ca- tholick Church , and the invifible Church , and by Come modern ones,the Catholick invifible Church. Of this Church indeed none are reckoned by us as Mem- bers, none received into it for Members by Chrift , but his Elecl, called into a Ipiritual Communion with himlelf, and made true. Children of God by the grace of internal adoption, and fan&ification of the fpirit, through Faith : of which Members, lome are warring the good warfare of grace, and fighting the good fight of Faith > againfl: the powers and principaliiies of the aire, and thefe be called militant Members, who are actually juftified and fan&ificd pcrfons. And there 'are other of thefe , called Triumphant Mem- bers of this Church, who have fought the good fight of Faith* and finifhed their courfe,and are the fpirits of juft men made ■perfect, a£tuallyr happy, and blefled for ever. Now we do not make, or account the Drunkards , Lyars, Msckers, Scoffers^ Hypocrites, gic. to be any Members of this £hurch , and there- fore you do but beat the aire, and fight with your own fancy, to fay , that none fuch of the Church of England, are Members of this Church of Chnfi , which is his myftical and invifible body : for fo your defcription of the Church, at the begin* ning of your leaf, and fome of your Texts alleadged there>do •imply. And yet I mult minde you again of fome prefumpti* on in you fif no worfej to exclude abfolutely, all Lyar$> Swearers, Drunkards > &cm out of the Chirch of theEletTy or the invifible one? feeing there are a third fort of the Ele3:> namely the uncalled ones, who are to be called s who though they be not actual Members? as the militant and Trium- phant Ele£r,yet they arc potential Members of this Church, and in Gods decree, to be executed in due time , other [heep I have which are not of this fold , them alfo J mufi bring , and they fohn iot\6.fhallhcarmy voice, and there (hall be one fold, SCC. Such a one was Paul, an Eledt VeHelfchough uncalled J even then>when he . Divers deceptions of the nme Church ^c. 1 3 he was a blafphcmer, and perfecutor , and injurious, Ait,?. and 1 Tim, i. you fhould have (poken untrucly, it living in thofe dayes5you had (aid, Blafphemers^Perfecutours^Scc. were no Members of 'Chri ft s Churchy and how can you wiite, char, Lyarsand Drunk ards^&cc. are no Members of the fami*,when as Come of thefc , though uncalled in prefenr, may even in prefent belong to Gods Election , and may be called ,ere you are a warejas 1 faid before, the Lord knoweth who Are his i fo he knoweth when to call men, even loyterers, and (landers idle, and at what hour, in his Vine-yard, the 3d.6th.9th, or nth, hour. Math 20.1. &c. Again 2/7, The Church of Chrift is taken more largely, yet properly to, for the whole multitude of believing Chri- ftians. Thus ^#.8.3 # Saul made havock of the Church , and 1 . Tiw.5.1 6, Let not the Church be charged^ that is , the whole number of profefling believers : This is called, for diftin&ion fake, the vifible Church ; and becaufeic is dilperfed abroad into all places now, and may be (cen at all times (omewherc, it is called by fome>the Catholfck vifible Church, of which all particular Churches, whether National>or but Parochial and all particular perfonswith their Children through the world are branches, 1 Cor.i 2.1 3. Of this Church,tne Mem- bers are onely believers , in oppofition to the Heathen and Pagans, who are infidels , without Chrift- , without God in the World^ without God in Chrift. But then,you muft know,they are ot two forts,one that believe in Chri(t,& lerve him really and truely & indeed, andheart;another, that do them but in (hew and tongue and ear,falily, and but titularly. I acknow- ledge that particular vifible Churches confiding of mixtures of the godly and wicked, Ele£t and Reprobate cannot be called (though true Churches.) The body of Chrift pro- perly, or Chrift the head of them (for then Chrift muft be a head wkh many bodies, and the Saviour of all particular Churches, and of the wicked and the Reprobates (for he is t he faviour of his body y Eph. 5 .* 3 .) But yet I muft hold what St. P*ul faith, of, and to the particular vifible Church of C°~ rmth^ 1 Cor. 11.27. Now are ye tho body of Chrift ^ and Mem- bers in particular ,or for your part, and I hold it (with fome, though but (bme of our Divines) tobeappliableto other vi- C 3 0ble- 1 4 Divers accepwns of the name Chnrchfec* fible Churches,even ours oi England) fby your leave, Sir:) Their and our Church may be called alio, and are the body of Chrift and Members in particular, or tor their and our parr. But this is, and mult be taken andunderftood, onely in refpeclt of them therein fas lii the Church of CwMthjwhu are truely Saints, believers indeed? and Ekcl ot which iorr, as St. Paul knew, there were divers in Cormh,(o you and I may have reafon to think , and ought have charity to fay, there are many in our National Church of England , and fome in every one of our Parochial Congregations. An heap, wherein there is more Chaffe than Wheat,is called an heap of Wheat; a Field wherein are more Tares and other Weeds than Corn, is llfo called a Corn Field, (o the viiible Church is called the body ot Chrift, taking its denomination from its better part : But properly, and indeed, that is not the body ot Chrift, which (ball not be with him lor ever. Now of this Church,is the queftion ; Sc I affirm>:hat the Church of Engl, is a true Church of Chrift, notwithstanding the mix- ture of Lyars,Druuka ids, Swearers, with them that are true, fober, and fear an Oath, elfe there would be no true Church of Chr)ft upon earth, for m every one there is fuch a mix- ture, and many timesr he wicked, Sc corrupt, are the greater and predominant part. Look upon the Church ot Ifrael in the time Of Ifaiah, Ah \ finfull Nation, a people laden with ini- quity, 4 feed of evil doers, Children that are corrupters^ they have forfaken the hod, there is no foundneffe in it, but wcttxds and brai- fety and petrifying fores, from the file of the foot to the Crown of the head,yet the Lord there, by the Prophet calleth them his ChiU drtn,& Jfrael my people ;Ifa. i .3 .4.The fame Church is owned by Chrift in his time, as his Church ; and Mofes Chair , and the people are Cent unto it by Chrift (wbarfocver they fay un- to you,doandobferve, as to their Do£trine,) and yet the Seniles, Pharifees, and Hypocrites face in it, and had filled that Church with fuperftitious prahefw,&c. ai:e they not ftiled the Churches of Chrift and of God ? and yet there Were in them as grofkly erroneous, and propiaancly wicked, as D ivers deceptions of the mme Church ,&c, 1 5 as in our Church, or more, moved away unto another Gofyel, fallen from the grace of Chrift , holding the Doblrine of Balaam and the Nicolaicans, fuffer'wg Jefabei to teach, and to feduce the ftrvants of God to commit j ~om. cat'wn , and to eat things facriflced to Idols, and in a word, the Synagogue of Satan, (o ie of them) yet the Church of Chrift, dwelling even where Sat am feat ts, Rev. 2.13, and 3.9. But I will inftance, efpecialiy in the Church of God at Corinth^ named and brought in by you to prove our Church oi England, none of Chrift's- Church, becaufe that was (an£ti- fied in Chrift Jefus, called to be Saints, but fo is not ours. But let us awhile compare both Churches together, in (omc* tilings they are alike and equal : That Church was full of di- vinous, envy, and ftrife, (and Co is ours, at this time.) There fome were of 'Paul's , anddefpifed ?**«■» or fiphas ;fomc were of Apollo" s, and regarded not ?**/; Com; were of Cephas, and cared for neither : (and (o here fome are of Presby- ter* fome of Independent, fome of Bifliop ,each defpifing the other, and fome are of Anabaptift, who flights and con- temnes them all) in that Church, was praStifed fornication, and fuch as was not fo much as named among the Gentiles, and alfo much idolatry, < in this Church alfo,are thefams fins, or very like them, committed and by-name , Fornica- tion and Idolatry.) Now if riiat Church of Corinth, notwith* ftanding thofe groffe and fcandalous enormities? were called and (tiled the Church of God , fan lit fed in Chrift Jefus, ffor fome alto amongft them were of Chrift, 1 Cor. 1 . 1 2.) c*ikd to be Saints \ In like manner may our Church of England, having but the like corruptionsbe ftiled likewifethe Church of God , .fan&ifi'ed m Chrift Jefus (for fome alfo amongft us, are of J efus Chrift.) Nay, more, in fome corruptions Sc enormities the Church of Corinth exceeded, and furpafled ours of England. There were fome of that Church that embraced, and ftufly main- tained that grand £c fundamentai Herefie of denying the re- lurrc&ion of the body, infomuch that the A pottle, fpends a whole Chapter almoft , and brings many ftrong Arguments to confute it: but I have not heard of any in Communion with our Church that isfo Heretical ; fome indeed ? that are of 1 6 Divers deceptions of the name church^c. ot the reparation from our Church, do hold fuch an opinion as I have heard, and read alfo,as 1 remember. Again,there was in that Church a nocorious and egregious prophanation of the Lords Table , in that they approached ic, not in igno- rance onely, not decerning the Lords body, but in gluttony and drunkennede, iCV.ii.ii. Truxe is much charged up- on our Church about the ignorant and fcandalous, their co- ming to the Sacrament ot the Lords Supper ; but I never yet heard this fcandelof our Church,that rren,or women might or did come drunken to the fame. Now if the Church at Corinth, were called by SuPaal, the Church of God there £anctih>d in Chrift Jefus , who were To notorioufly prophane ; our Church in England , which is not f o far cor- rupted, may much more be reputed, a Church of Chrift, fanctified in Chrift J efus, &c* If your felf, or any other fhall fay, that St. Vaul by thofe words following expounds himfeif , whom he means by the Church of God at Corinth, namely (them who are fanctified in Chrifi Jefus , called to be Sa'nts) whom he writes unto as the only Members of that Churchjall may be granted unto you, Sc yet nothing againft u> , or the Church oiEngl, For thofe Members were of two forts, as the words imply ,either Saints indeed fanctified in Chrift Iefus ; or Saints in (hew, called to be Saints? though indeed not fo, as many be called, but few chofen, and they are not all Ifrael, that are of Ifrael% and cal- led Israelites, Or elfe leaving out thofe two little words (to be) which are not in the Original Greek , but as you may difcern by the different Character, fupplied by the English Tranfla- tours, we may read thus, to all that are fanttified in Chrifi Jefus, called Saints, and then thefelaft words expound the former? of all fuch as bear the name and form,though many of them wanting the thing and power of godlinefie and fanctifica- tion. And fo the Apoftle more, or lcfTe,by few and by ma- ny fetcheth in all the Members, vifible and invifible , titular and real, and of both forts maketh up the Church ol God at Corinth, And that the Apoftle meaneth thus , is apparent from the fcope and purpof e of the writing this Epiftle to that Church, which was to reprove them for fome vile and grofTe Divers accept ions of the name Church ,&cc. 17 grolTe corruptions amongft them, which he knew (and we acknowledge) to be repugnant and contrary to true nolinefle and {an&ihcation , yet not inconfiftent with, or deftru&ive to-a true Church. . r c I believe, you like not the (enfe and meaning of St. *ZW; that he fhould call the Church of Corinth, the Church of God, and yet not all therein true and real Saints; becaufe it quite croffeth your tenet and opinion of our Church of Eng~ land) that it is no Church of Chrift, by reafon of many lyars, f wearers, &c. who are in it and of it. But in io doing, you turn Univerfity man, whether you will, or no, and are a- mongft the Philofophers (is Saul alfo amongft the Prophets}) the Philofophers(l lay) of the Epicureans and of the Stoicks, who Aft, 17.18. cncountred Paul-, and fome faid , what wilt this Babler fay ; other fome ,he feemeth to be a fetter forth of ftSrange (jods'-ibecaufe he preached unto them Jefus and the Refurre- H ion : fo you, if you encounter St.Paul in that point and {enfe above, will be a double Philofopher ; (I am afraid you do not love the Title, though fingle) both an Epicurean Philo- fopher, and a Stoical Philofopher, and do (ay (in effect; what doth this Babbler, or (which is worfe) this flatterer fay ? He feemeth to be a fetter forth of ftrange Churches; becatfc he preacheth the Church of Sod at Corinh , and yet taxeth fo many grofly erroneous and vilely corrupt Mem- bers of the fame, St. Paul (fure) had full knowledge and good intelligence of the great diforders and corruptions of that Church, no lefle than Schifme, and Heretic, and Idola- try, and Fornication ,and Drunkenneflc , at, and before the Lords Table (all which alfo , or fome of which were further declared unto him by them of the houfhold of Chloe , *Cor. 1 • 1 1. Netther ufed he at any time flattering words, i.Thef.2. 5.) It cannot therefore be fmagined,that he fhould fo far bewray his flatrering of the Corinthians* as to call them the Church of God,when they were none; (if your opinion be good) or fo far betray his knowledge as to falute them, all Saints,real Saints, who were this Church of God at Corinth, and that juft then when he is writing his Epiftle to them, to reprove the Schilmaticks and Hereticks, the Idolaters and Fornica- tors and Drunkards amongft them* The refuk and fum is : D ia 1 8 Divers acceptiw of the name Church fizc. in the Church of Corinth , they were not all truely Saints ; no nor all vifible Saints. (Though called to be both of thefe) for fome were openlyand vilibly prophanc and (candaloufly wicked to the eye of others : and amongft the vifible Saints, there were fome true believers , and others, but pretenders and profeflors onely.' but (notwithstanding the word part and Members of it) the Apoftle falutes the Corinthians as the Church of God; Now Sir 5 let me defire you, for your own good, and for a goodSchifme,tobeof/W:yea,I wifh all the Sectaries of Engl, would be followers of Paul : for fo he calleth to them to be; Bey e follow en.of me y even as I am of Chrift Jefttt, even in thit £piftle, i ^V.ii.i, according to hisexample, falute, and own the Church of England for the Church of Chrift , not- withstanding the Lyars , Drunkards therein , who are (though ) vifible and outward Mcmbers,and Saints in fhew, by reafon of their profeflion,and alio, becaufe there are in it, moreover,and above,- many that.are truely 3c inward Mem- -bers,and Saints indeed^ by reafon of their faith and good tlffe. So the Apoftle doth here own the Church of Corinth^ for the Church of God : So our Saviour Chrift doth own the Chair of jerhfaleptjiot the Chair of Mofes : as above I have (he wed. What fhall 1 add more ? I confefle true faith is efTential to constitute and denominate a Member, of the invifible -Church of Chrift, and to the right and well being , of it : but I may affirm alfothatprofeffton of that true faith is enough and fufficethtofpeakandcallone a Member of the vifible Church, and fo of the Church of England. Profeflors , you will noadeny us to be of the true faith; if you do, irs eafily to prove it, both on the people's, and on the ministers part; for that the one profeffeth by their due hearing, and the otfjer by their due voicing, (/.) Preaching the word of Faith : Thus Chrift proved his fheep. (i.) his Profeflors and fol- lowers ; my fheep hear my voice, Joh.i 0.27. FizfitThe.voice of the Turtle, («'.) Chrift is heard i»Q*r land, Cant.i. i2. we havea fixed and fetled vifible Miniftery of Chrifts word in£*£/<*»^,and thcfeals thereof , which is the form and toul of a true vifible Church. S»me indeed preach Chrifiy The true mirkx of tvifible Church. 19 Chrift, even of envy andftr'fe , and fome alfo of goodwill ;Thei one preach Chrift of contention, not fine ere ly *— — £#f fta. other of. love —-- what then }. notwithftand'mg.-'very way , whether in pre- tence, or in truth, Chrift. is preached ; And I therein da rejoyte,yea, andwillrejoyce, Phil.i 5, 16,1 7. and x 8. > Secondly, Behold, lift up your eyes, and look^ on the fields for the) are white already to the Harvefl ; the Citizens of Samaria are conning up to hear 4 he voice of C^rifit John 4, 3 $. And 3 fully, tick, aad difeafed, enduring quietly ,whom they cannot poflibly Ofgnd Difciflim and excommumcation^c. 2 1 poflibly amend ; and efpccially, with great care and caution, puttng away, or keeping of from ourfelves, fas the Apoftle ipeak>, 1 Cor. 5,1 3.) the wicked praftile?, if we cannot, the wicked perfons:and then alfo,mult the Minifters ot the Church be more frequent and fervent in preaching &c pray- ing, that Co this way, we may recompence the culpable de- fect of Difcipline, by a blamelefle excefle , (I mean diligence andfedulity)ofour Doctrine,for the furthering an i bringing forth of a Reformation, hungriug and thirfting after righte- oulnefle, which is blefTcd in the mean time. And again,whcre there is a Liberty and freedom of Diici- pHne, and of this of excommunication in any Church, or when it (hall be reft ored to our Church : I wilh it may be ufed i oberly and modcrately,vvithout rigour and tyranny ,ferioul- ly and fadly, without prophancfTe, or wanronnelle,feeing it-5 a medicine as very dolourou-, becaufe of humane infirmity to bear,fo dangerous by reafon of evil events may follow: The belt Phyfician comes feldom, and very haudly,to fear- ing,or (ccation of a Member from the body, he will try all means and medicines* before he will by a hafty and impru- dent Saw, or Razor cut of a parr, and make a lection , and endanger life : and much more the Phyfician? of the Soul (which the Guides $c Governours of the Church are) fhouM rarely and with much unwillingneffe , and illubency come forth to excommunication, and that not before they have tried all means of Admonition, Reproof , Exhortation, &c. keeping within thefe degrees and bounds* if they maybe avaylable.- In patience and meeknejfe inftrutting tho.fe that op' pofe themfelves, if Cjod fer advent we will give them repentance, to the acknowledging the truth, and \hat they may recover themselves out ofthefnare ef the Devil, 2 Tim. 2.25. without delivering them up to Satan, 1 Tim. 1.3$ otherwife they will more di- fturband offend the godly weak, than correct andamrni the refolurely wicked. But yet 1 mu{t tell you that (which the fierce Anaba^tift diflikes as much as the furious Donatift of old did, being as Simeon and Levi, brethren in evil.) That, a true vilibie Church may be,and is oft, where there is, or can be, no ex-» ecution of difcioliifary excommunication, or excommu.iicar D 3 ting 2 2 Ofgeod Difciplitte and excowmftnication&c* ting Difcipline; you may as well fay ,it 'cannot be a found body, which hath not a Member cut of ; or he cannot be a good Phy (icianj who never ufeth Se£tion,or a good C?lurur- geoiij who never ufeth fa wing; as that it is not a true vifible Church, which feldom,or never ufeth excommunication, this being not of the effence and life , but of the Ben-ciTence and health onely of the fame ; and that becaufc > theeflence and form of a true vifible Church, is not placed (though you place it there) nor doth confift, in the conditions onely , and manners of the Members thereof-: but in thofe conititu- tive and formative things, I mentioned even now all which come up to this one- the mutual Covenant 'twixt God and a people, w ith the feals and conditions thereof , the which makes a Holy vifible Church, as is clear from Gods own mouth, Pfal, 5 0.5 . and 7 . Hear, O my people, and I will fpeal^ O Ifraei, Jam Cjod, even thy God; gather my fonts together unto we : Thofe that have made a Covenant with me by Sacrifice, But .th's is your fault (g;ve me leave to tell you of it, for the wounds of a friend are better than the kiiles of an Enemy) tofetno eye, or take no notice of the healthf till and lively parts, and conftitutions of a Church of Chrilt in England, you are here pnrblinde and tongue tyed ; but you fix both eyes, and take cpgnifance of theftck diftempers, and fome difeafes, that are broken out, and do invade the well-being of it. I muft here again, and (hall as often as I think upon them, bewail the various depravatious and corruptions of thJsour Church of England,^ Jo many Ulcers and Blains, and putrifying Sores breakiyg^out therein ; I much admire, yet magnify the long fufferingaj^forbearance of God to- wards us, that he hath not cut us of long ago, and efpecial- ly of late from being his*peoplc, removed hi^ Candle-Hick from us, fpued us out of his mouth, and caft us away-as un- unprofitable branches ; all which he may do, of right, I con- feiTe,and will do, in fad (I fear) unleile we fpcedily fall to repeptance and reformation. But yet io long as God is pleafed to fet down his Candle-flick in EngUnd , to hold ottt his Stars in his hand, and to call in as grelts from the high- wayes 8c hedges,Sc ihall gather as fmirs,GVv^« of TJioms,and Etgs of Thi files ; that is, fo long as God continues here, a fet- led Of good Dlfciflirie andexcommttnicationfizc* 1 3 led preaching Miniftery of his word, a conftant hearing au- ditory of the fame, &c an ordinary conversion of people unco the Faich thereby ; I cannot have the heart (as you fhould not have it) for all thofe prophanations and irregularities of manners in life , (which you blazen abroad, and with that bad fon, lay open the nakedneffe of your mother, diunken- neffe , &c. which you fhould rather have gone backward f com, and covered with the mantle of charity) nor for the ecrors and Herefies in matters of Faith, (which you have not charged upon it) to decry it a Church of (Thrift, or de- cree it a Synagogue of Devils (as you do.) For I know fo long as the three former remarkable evidences do remain profeffedly in a Church, it is Chriftian ; neither can the two later mentioned allegations cancel them, or (as I may fo (peak) unchurch, or unchriften it. (*. ) Make no Church ofChrift,or no true Church of Chrifi} no more, then, the fame,' or worfc did this Church oiCor'mth^ or thofe Churches x&AfMyOi the other Apoftoiical Churches .- no more , laftly, than fores, or boyls, (icknefies, or difeafes, would make you either iio man, or no true man, fo long as your foul and life remains in you* In prefent, I plainly fee from your Letter, that you hold fome dangerous errors, and have fome other inward and outward d iftempers, f preading in your fpirit and * . fpeechvery ftrong,fetled and prevailing in you, C which I will neither mention nor touch, to exafperate them J yet for all this, I do think ofyou,andfhallfpeakofyou, as a true Childe of God , and wifti you better health notwithftand- ing. I will now onely compaffe you about with a Cloud of Pa- rables, as fo many witneiles unto the truth I am upon, as the field having both Wheat and Tares m it, ^^.13. 24.47.8. TheH'f inclofing the good and badFifh, The matter keep- ing faithfull: and idle fervants : A great houfe having in it Vef~ fels of Gold and Silver ', and alfo ofWoodaudBarth^ Tim.2.20, of the Vineyard bringing forth wilde Grapes and f weec Crapes, Jfat 5 . the Bride Chamber receiving good guefts and fomeevi],w«Wf a wedding (j*ra*»/-,Math. 22. 12. the at- tended and waiters for Chrift, wife Virgins and fooli(kVirgins% sJMatb. 2 5 , 1 , the Fold and Flock, to confift of Sheep and Goates : 24 Par dies of Chrift applied to the Church. Goates :Yea , the Wolf alfo fh*H dived wtth the Lamb, and the Leopard fall Ijc down with the Kidy and the Calf, and the jonng Lion together \ and the Cow and the Bear, the jottng ones (hail Ije down together. (The wbichwordsof the Prophet//*/,! know, are upon another point of truth , yet are they appliable alfo to this in hand, as the Apoftle St./Wappiieth.) And there- fore as oiu Saviour Chrift faith,of the one, let both grow to- gether, the Wheat,and the Tares; and for the Tares, being amongft the Wheat, let it not be denied to be the Field of the Husband-man. So I may fay, let both lye together, the good and bad Fiih '■> let both d w.U together, the faithful! and the floathfullfetvant ; It both ftand together, the Veffels of Wood and Gold; let both hang together, the (owr and the fweet Crapes ; let both fit together, the unworthy and wor- thy gueft j let both wait together, the unwile and wile Vir? gins '•> let both feed together, the Goates and the Sheep , un- til! the great day of leparation : and in the mean time, for the bad Fifh, floathfull fervants , wooddeu VelTels, fower Grapes,unworthy guefts,unwife Virgins,and unclean Goats; let it not be denied to be Net?Houfe, Vineyard, Bride- Cham- ber, and flock of Chrift. 1 mean, let both meet together, hear together, pray together ;. the gracious fpeaker and the fwearer, the (ober and the drunkard, the truth fpeaker and the lyar,the fincere and the hypocrite , and for fomr,or mar ny f wearers, drunkards, lyars, and Hypocrites in it, let it not be denied , (the Church of England) to be the Church of Chrift, ever a true vifible Church of GiriiU. You will not deny (none of your fide do that I know of) that the Church vifible is reprefented and meant in thefc Parables : Therefore is called the Kingdom of Heaven by Chrift fpeaking rhem by the Prophet, the Vineyard of the Lord : and by the Apoftle, the houfe of God> a Church is a truely conftitutcd Church , though there be in ic believers and Hypocrites, godly and ungodly, as Members of it: and even the Hypocrites, and wicked remaiuing in the Church, their external, profeflion, & receiving the word in likenefs 8C appearance,as the believers,&: the godly,makes them Mem- bers of the vifible Church, even as f to inftancc but in one of them) the Veftels of Brail c and the Vellels of Gold , their being Mtmbtrs of the Chunk etvned by the tdfojlks. 2 < being in one and the fame houfe, and the one appearing, and Jiike the other, in outward colour and luftre , makes the one a part okhe furniture of the houfe, like as the other, and fee- ing your felf have in the beginning conferled as much , that Hypocrites and Devils may be in the tme vifible Church, what need I fay any more, but inferre, that the prefence of wi but a willingncflc of profefling and embracing the Gofpel ^ howbeit, fome did not receive it from their hearts ; as is evident, A&. a. 41. amongfl whom notwithstanding were Ananias and Stphira, and you know what Members they were, ^#.4.34* Attt s.v.i . So no more was required by the Church of Simon Magw , though be- fore a Sorcerer, butanhiftorical believing upon the fight ©f miracles done by Peter. He was baptiied and received prefentlyintoChurch-memberftiip, yet an Hypocrite, fo that you fee, even Peter and the Apoftles could not difcover, and fo did not require, laving faith, to come into Church- memberfhip. The like may be faid of Demos Hymenew^A- lexander, and even Judas himfelf , who had nothing to make them Members oi the vifible Church , but that they pro- fefled the faith awhile, and adhered to Chrift and the Apo- ftles > though afterwards they fell away from it; yea, you cannot deny them to have been very eminent Members>who exercifed many Ecclefiaftical A£ts,both of order and Jurif- dicltion, as might be (hewed. I would not be miftaken , as if flying from the Tents of the Anabaptifts, I did fall into the Camp of the Papits, who from theCe parables , do argue in , Atheifts , Reprobates, Hypocrites , and the openly wicked, to be true Members of E the Members $ivned by VapHs^ no true Members. the true vifible Church: for though I have fhewed from them* that there may be in a true viiibie Church fuch a mix- ture of Atheifts , and godly? ele£t, and Reprobate, fincerc, and Hypocrites, ere. yet it followeth not from them , that the Atheift with the godly* and the Reprobate with the Ele£r,and the fmcere wich the Hypocrites, are true Mem- bers of the vifible Church; they are in and amongft.- but not of them ; Members in external profefllon , not internal Uni- on ; in Title, not in truth; in bodily commixtion,not in fpiri- tual con junction ; or if yeu will, Members of the Church , as its a vifible fociety of profeilours outwardly , not of the Church, as it's the invifible and myftical body of Chrift, which is of reall y believers. The eye of glaife, the tooth of filver, the leg of wood, by art put into the body>,is as much a Member of a true, and a living body, as they Members of the true and living Church : yet as thole things have a place in the body, and an Union external with it ♦ and move, and go up and down with it, and are reputed parts of it, fo the other, who hold a fellowihip with the other , and keep an outward profeflion of faith with, and before them , in hear- ing the word, defiring and partaking of the feals , they are to be accounted Members of the Church vifible , as vifible, fo as to make them fuch Caving faith is not effentially re- quired, as if he could, or fhould be no Member at all, of the Church vifible, if he have not faving faith. ) It's true , it's Faith that mud make a man, or woman an acceptable, or myftical Member of the Church , burto make one a vifible Member of the Chriftian Church, nothing is required: but to be born a Chriftian, and to keep external, and Church- Communion with the reft of Gods people. £ And fo now I may conclude my Letter in anfwer to yours .-For all your whole Letter, and the feveral points thereof are anfwered in this one poiiat I have aflerted, that the Church of England is a true vifible Church ot Chrifoand if fo, then your feparation from it,isnotjuftand warrant- able % then is our Miniftery thereof crue and juftifiable; then is our baptifme of Infants? right and allowable, and fo I end,, and remain your very friend, commending yon to Cjod , and to the word of htsgraa^which is able to build you upland ghe you an Separation from a Church fatv lawfulljhow unlaw full. 2 7 an inheritance amongft all them that are fanBified , A£t. 20. 3 2. praying you further , to confider what I fay and write ; and praying for you, that the Lord would gtve you understanding in all the fe things . Se or the other fen(c, all thofe Texts or Scri- pture which arebrought by your party to juftify their Ccpara- tion from out Church ; by reafon of the evil and corrupt Memb ers of it. Then are you not to feparate your fell from anyone of the publick ordinances, or any one at the publick ordinances of our Church (unlefs in cafe of excommunica- tion,) thefeare not corruptions, if they fhould be fuppofed corrupt. For the prefence of the wicked, or his wickedneffc doth not defile, or tJollute the ordinance : (if it do, it doth it to himfelf , not to you,) (0 the prefence 01 the godly, or your godlineffe doth not fanclifie the ordinance (ii it do, it doth it to your felf, not unto him.) I fay that m none of the Scri- ptures aDeadged by your party , is there commanded any corporeal, or local Separation from external Communion, or fellowfhip with Churches , becaufe offome iin,orfalfe. worihip pra&ifed in them : but ond j a Spiritual and affedio- nal Separation from internal Communion 8c fellowship in the fin,.or falfe worihip j which, becaufe it may be,divers way?, not pofitively ill acting with it,, in contenting, counselling, perlwading to it, but negatively, in not hindring $ rebuking, mourning for it,there mutt be a warinefTe, cauteloufnefle, even in holding external communion with a corruptChurch. Or Separation from a Chunk ^hm lawfttU,hm unlawful! t 29 Or* if there be any fuch local reparation commanded , as HoT.4.1 5. Come not ye mto Gilgal, neither go ye up to Beth- aven , and fo %jvel. 18,4, Come out of Babylon my people : they were fuch places where Idolatry was, both publickly taught, authorised, profeiled, and prattifed,to the abroga* lion ot Gods Covenant and true worfhip : from which kinde of focieties $c Churches, you may feparate, where you fiide them, like as we have done from Rome, (yet holding a Com- munion With it, fo far ask profeiTeth any of the fundamental truth, as one God, three perfons, the two natures inChriuS &c. but what doth this make for your feparation from the Church of England , where are the true ligns of Gods pre- fence, and real marks of a Church vifible,the word and Sa* craments in fubflance profeiled, and all truths fundamental and Evangelical maintained. I have mewed, and I Qiall (hew anon, the Church ot If r*el to be as corrupt,aChurch as ours of England^ if not more as likewife the Church of forinth to be more erroneous ir matter of the Idols Table, and the denial of the Refurrccti" on, then we, and other Churches of the New Te (lament, as Thyatira and /Vrg^wH^tobemore wicked than ours,where the Doctrines and pra&ifes of Balaam and Jejabel were held up, which are thrown down amonglt us> as to the defence of them -and yet I never read the Lord Jefus in his time , no' any of the Apoltles after him, ever warning and calling up on the true Ifrtelhet, or found believers, to feparate and di vide from thofe Churches, and to erect, and fet up a ne*> Church of their own by themfelves ; but onely bid them be- ware of the Leaven of the Scribes and Pharifees, and hold faft the name of Chrift till he come. Which, futely , they would have done , even advifed to a feparacion, from fuch vifible Churches if this had been the onely remedy to them, living in, and amongft fueh erroneous and corrupt vi- fible Churches ; and if there had not been another better way to fly from the wrath to come , and efcape the judge- ment of thofe Churches , namely by not communicating with them in the a&s of their errours, Herefies , Idolatries, and wicked nefles , amongft whom they lived and dwelt. For if every errour, fin,orfalfe worfhip, were able to give a E 3 ' juH 3 o Separation from a Church Jhew Uwfultyow unUwfull. juft ground and good warrant of reparation from that locic- ty and AfTembly, where it is held, done, or pra&ifedj why do not you feparates, make a feparation from amonglt your felves, and your own Congregations (as indeed fome have done heretofore ,Sc lately in Rochfordy hundred 50. or 60. at once, as I have been inform'd,) as in which, andamongft whom there arc grofle errours, vile fins,conftant Hypocrifies, two of your fociety ; but fome years ago were accufed for a Rape,and no marvel ; for no lefTe than three wives as fome, and fifteen wives, as others report, could content the Ring- leader of your Se£t, a Taylour, John of Ley den , your Name- fake, in part , and another of his Comeradcs,(^»i^r^- I'wg died like a beaft} how then lived he? as the Hiftorian of that age hath affirmed in print, Sletdan byname : yea, that old Se&of the Anabaptifts, they allow ot plurality of wifes, under name of fpiritual marriagcs,and that it is no Adultery, as therefore yours have held focicty with your own wicked ones , fo you may have fociety (1 fay not, familiarity) even with other wicked and unbelieving perfons,as in civil things, foalfom facred, where the fervice of God lieth upon both, as their and your duty : with them , I fay, not fimply as wic- ked, and unbelieving, but relatively, as to the end you may exhort and admonilh,edifie thcm>and do them good by your zeal, and example , and prefence : though otherwise. There are indeed refpe&ive ends, in relation to which , you may feparate from their very fociety. Firfr, that you may thereby bring the wicked to repentance by fhaining them, as unworthy of good company, if fo be that will do it , and not rather harden them: 2^, that you may keep yourfelf free from partaking of their fins, by a&ing in them,or conniving at them,if the cafe be fo that you needs mud comply. But you write fafely : Thatjotf feparate but from the corrup- tions of our Church : and I will tell you farther, for your con- firmation, if you walk according to that you write ; if other- wife for your conviftion , that the corruptions of a Church, f o long as the vitals and fundamentals of faith and truth abide,are no good ground for you to make a feparation from that Church) farther than the corruptions of it, witnefle the Church of Corinth; from which, though much tainted with errours Separation from a Church Jhoxo laxvfulljhovo unlaw full. 3 1 errours and mifd emeanours, neither /W, uor ApoU$sY nor Cephas, nor any Corinthian believer made a full and final re- paration, otherwife than from the corruptions of the tame. And (it may be) you aim at this fcandal and reproach? to be caft upon by evil men, that you fcparate from the Church of England , becaufe of the corruptions thereof: and therefore vindicate your felf by this faying? that you feparate but from the corruptions, not from the Church, nor any thing of God that is amongft us. If fc>, then flay and joyn with us, to fup- port the Church, and reform the corruption?, to heal the difeafes, and preferve the health of the Church of England: And in the prefence of God and integrity of your heart, not onely defire to own as you fay, and proteft you do,but defire and own, whatfoever is of God amongft us, namely the ad- miniftration of the word and Sacraments by a lawtull ordi- nary miniftery therein. And now laftly, remember, with what a great Atteftati- on, even in pre fence ofGodyand m the integrity of your hearty you have bound up your defires to own whatfoever is of God a- mongft tts. God is not mocked \\\.your heart condemne yotty God is greater than your hearty and knoweth all things^John 3.^0. God knoweth, and your heart alfo, and I onely propound a quaere,or (two you will put many quaeres to me anon;) Whe- ther (and that before your reparation to ground it right, and not after your reparation to build and hold it up) have you fearched the Scriptures throughly, and (ought for the true and genuine interpretation , comparing one place with an- other, minding the fcope of the writer, and looking upon the proportion offatthyKom.12^6. have you looked into the fa<- voury Comments and Expolitions of pious arid learned men, now dead, or living, and advifed with (uch as are of full age., tven thofe , who by reafon of ufe have their fenfes exerctfed to difcem both good md evily (true and falfe,)ift£. 5.14. have you perufed without a partial and prejudicare opinion) the rea- sons and arguments drawn out of Scripture * by thofe, to whom you are oppofite in opinion and pracMie? for doth your haw condemne^or fudge any man before it hearhim, and know what he doth Q or faith, J ?o/?« 7.5 1 . have you by prayer earneflly looked up to God, and .called upon him for his i pi- ns 3 2 SepATAtionfrem 4 Church Jhsw Uvf/dlfaw unlawfull. rit to lead you into all truth, and for that Eye-falve to anoint your eyes that you may fee ? for he is thejpirit of truth, (There is alfo a (pint of errour.)^/u 6.i 3. Rev.}. 1 8, 1 John 4.6. Are you willing if any by the light of the word, and weight of rcafons drawn out of it, (hall convince you, and judge you, 1 0 fall down on your face and worfh'p God, and report that God is in him of a truth, and will youthen be ready to deny your felt and your errour, 1 Cor. 14. 25. Take up your CrolTe and the contrary truth,and follow (Thrift and his Church as a Men> ber of it ? Then you may lay that in the prefence of God, and in the integrity of your heart, you defire to own the Do cl:rines of the Gofpel, and the truth of Jefus Chrift , which I fuppofe you mean by the waves and pra&ifes and ordi- nances of our Lord Jefus Chrift. But as I f aid before, the Lord knoweth all things, and what is in your heart and in your defires to own ; which if it be thofe things you here i'peak, (as the tongue fliould be the interpreter of the heart and lpeech,the exprefTer of the defires:) Then put your heart into your hand and do it, and turn your defires into yoardeeds; or elfe lay your hands upon your mouth,and fay it nOt,leaft you come into the number of thole, who fay, but do not; yea, lay your hand upon your heart and defire ic notjleaft alfo you be amongft thofe, who are wifoers and woulders, but no good houftiolders, as the Proverb faith : In a Word, own but whatsoever is of God amongft u.',own but the wayes, pra&ifes , and ordinances of Jefus Chrift Sepa- rate but from the corruptions of our Church, I will here break of any further reply to your Letter, and you and I fhall agree well enough together; we (hall be both men, after one the others heart and hand, defiring the fame things, and doing the fame things. But I fee this will nor be fo , for it followeth in your Letter. That there is fome difference between you and us about tlie infti* Too unions of Chrift , and particularly about baptifme , and that I have de fired to he ere from fome of you fomething concerning that Hear t°m* ' although you do not altogether approve of this way of wrim ting , bee an fe it is to priv ate, except it migH be communicated to public^ view, for you would willingly have others the better for what jeu jhall (through the ftrength ofChrifi)fay for that good and v ■ - ■ ■ > ■ Baptijjtigfif Believers. 33 And old way yandpra8ife of Chrifiyand his Difc'/ples, {left for tu to follow , 1 Cor. II. I.) of baptifing believers : and therefore / fh*M commit the lejfe to mk^and paper yonely I will de fire jony if you fleafey to anfwer thefe few ^uerries by plain and direct Scri* QUasrieS, ptures. As to the difference between you and me, (if (o you mean) about the inftitutions of Chrift, and particularly about ba- ptifme,I wonder how it {hould come,feeing we never chang'd a word together about thefe matters ; How my defire of hearing (omething from you, hereabouts, came in and out, you have already read it in the beginning of this anfwer. Now indeed, fince I have read your Letter, J fee your diffe- rence from me ; and by that time you have read over my an- fwer, you will difcover my difference from you: But this I aflureyoi^ that there will be no great, not any difference be- twixt us, about that matter which you mention; namely, the baptifing of believers : yea, what Divine , or Minifter of the Church of England ever denied the baptifing of belie- vers ? I have often wifht , fince it is my Lot , to be a conten- der and con te ft er with you, that you had either more of your natural wit and real on, or fome of our artificial Lo- gick, or Rhetorick, that fo you might have been able, to nave put your meaning and opinion into better and fignifi- cant words, to have ordered your matters in a better Me- thod, to have underftood the diftin&ion of things better, and to have ftated differences 't wixt us and you better than you do. For we grant your terms and words? the baptifing of be- lievers, and where's the difference then ? in your fenfe and meaning, I fuppofe \ the which if it be no more , than the words import, (as itfhould?) here is the hand of fellowfhip, I hold the baptifing of believers; That Jews andGentiles,con- verted unto Chriff,and believing, or profefltng faith in him, are then, and not before, to bebaptifed* Herein we are fol- lowers of ChnltsDifciples and Apoltlc?> and therefore that Text of the 1 Cor, 1 1 . 1. is nothing againft us , but for us. But if your meaning kbe , the baptifing of believers onely, which is more than the words imply, then )I pull back the hand of fellowfli p,and deny it; For the Children, though F not 34 The good and Old way. not believers, ot thofe baptifed and believing Parents , whe- * ther Jews, or gentiles } may, and ought to be baptifed,though CI fay) they do not actually believe to our apprehenfion> nor can make profeflion# I cannot but much Wonder at you , for calling the bapti- fing of believers (Take it but fo) the good and old way, and praftifc of Chrift : for fkft,Chr iff: baptifed none, but his Difciples, as the Scripture faith ,7^^4.2. therefore it was not at all the pra&ife of Chrift, as you fayvbut of ihis Difci- ples : fecondly , you are not Co Well acquainted with the New Teftament , and the new carriage ot things there , it appears by your phrafes of Talking of the good and old way, and erpecially of calling baptifme a good and old way : The good and old w ay, \n the language ot the fpirir, jerem, 6.1 6„ which We are 10 ask^ for, and wall^ therein, is the Law and the Teftimony, which they were to feek to; fo the Prophet Efai expounds it, Efai 8.2o# Mofesund the Trofhets^hom they are tohear,L.vk£,i6.z9t and Circumcifion rather was one path of that good and old way. But now under the Gofpel,Imay phrafe it with Paul, 2 Cor. 5*1 7. If any be in Chrift, he is a new Creature, old things Are f aft away ; behold, all things are become new, and fo Heb,\ o, I p. and 20. We have liberty to enter into the holteft by the blond efjefm, by a new and living way, -which he hath confecrated,and new made for ut, one path _ whereof , of this good and new way, is bapufme, and baptifme of believers, and baptifme of the Children of believing and baptifed Parents : even as Cir- cumcifion, and Circumcifion of believers, and Circumcif 1011 of the Children of believing, and Circumcifed Parents , was a path of that good and old way under the Law , and alio before the Law, of that good and elder way. Gene fay. But for baptifme of believers oncly, as you will have it, it is neither that good and old way : nor the good and new way, and fo no way to be admitted ; feeing the Infants un- der the Gofpel have as good a Title to the Seal of baptifme, being born of baptifed Parents in Covenant with God,as the Infants under the law had to the Seal of Circumcifion, being born ot Circumcifed Parents, in Covenant with God,as vviii hereafter more clearly appear :and now, Sir,a re you to high- ly The good and old rvy. ^ \y conceited ftilU of what you have faid for that good and old way, and pra£tifc of Chrift, that you are more willing to make it publick,&: communicate it to view,that others might be the better for what you write about it, ( 1 gheffe you mean by printing of it ? ) Though I have already dill waded you as a friend from fuch an attempt in you , and gave you fome reafons for it, tending to your own good and others alio : I (hall now yield unto it", for two reafons refpe&ing my felf; yea, I with your Letter had been fent printed unto me. i . For then the Errata's , or falfe £«g///fr, at leaft, thereof would have been corrected by the Oyerfeer of the Prcfle, (as is ufuall) lb that I fhould not have been troubled , as IBaptifmc am, to pick out your fenfe, as (to inftance in this partonely) Hear I am? when I heere ofbaptifme and Jguerryes, Qusrics i. For then it would have confirmed me, in an opinion Ihavf* lately taken up, that the Printing-houfes will undoe the ftudying Colledges, and their Prefles overthrow , the others Desks : I mean, That, Panting, which was at firfl: a great while an excellent way, and means of Communica- ting to publick view, the hidden myfteries of the holy God, and the private knowledge of the learned man ; is now, and at laft ,like to be a ready way and means of diminiftiing that knowledge &: corrupting thole myfteries, by divulging the falfe conceptions and frothy exprefltons of every unftu- diou?,Uliterate,and felf-conceited novice. If the head do but itch a little>8t the brain be heated ,it*muft prefently break out * into the hand > and be written whatfoever it is that drop- peth from the brain, and when it is under hand, the hand al- fo itcheth,and it muft alio inftantly breakout into the prefTe, and be printed whatfoever it is that cometh to hand* Come, Sir, come, let you and I defire to lye private, and abftain from Communicating our writings to publick view , and commit the more to our own Ink and Paper ; let us leave it to 7^,that profound man of God,to wifh 8£ defire,/^ i y.3 2. 24. Oh 1 that my words were now written } Oh [ that they were p tinted in a bookj, that they were graven with an Iron Pen ^and lead in the Rock^for ever \ He might indeed both write and print ; but you and 1 will content our {elves with writing one to an- other, and will not venture our Letters to print them : it our F'a hearts 36 S. fliicienc r. ©ilciples To 2. Quxrks 4. t. *. hearts are inditing, or as the //*£. hath it, boyl, cr bubble up, a goedmatter, and WC (pcakoffta things we have made couch- ing baptifme, or other points, ic is enough for us , that our tongues Are the pens of a ready -writer, (or our pens are the tongues of a ready fpeaker : ) and fo, Sir, I hope you will not be offended with me , who give you the fame counfel , I intend to follow my fetf , never to be in princ, or to commu- nicate any of my private writings, to the publick view, as be- ing confeious of my weaknefles and wants , as to that way. And fo I come to your Querries, (which if you will notwith- ftanding print, write, I pray, Quaere's) as it followeth in your Letter, thus : For I mi ft write them out, though tedious and numerous. Onely I (hall de fire you, ifyoupleafe,to anfwer thefe few gucr- ties by flain and dircth Serif tares. Firfi of all whether the Commands of Chrifi and the exempla- ry praftifes of the Apofiles and Defciples of Chrifi written in the New Tefiament , are not written for our learning and Imita- tion, Secondly, whether -we may addtoo,or detraU from thefe Com- mands and examples of Chrifi and Defciples at. our pleafure with- out great Jin? Whether the Commands of Chrifi and his Apofiles , yoyned with their examples andprail'tfes are notfufictent for our rule and dire Bion -without the tradition andinventions of men ? Fourthly, -whether that Chrifi lefus is not as faithfull over his henfe as a fon in viving them cleere direliions how to build his houfe and of what materialises Mofeswasm thehoufe as a fer- vant. Whether any thing concerning the worfhip of God in the law,, given to the lews was built up -with arguments and darh^ que- fiionable confequenccs contrary to command given to Mofes or Solomon, Whether we have more power to build Chrifi s fpir'nual houfe finder the Gofpel by arguments and confequenccs, then the lews had their temporal and typical houfes under the Law, contrary to com- mand given forth at the fir fi< Whether any thing p er formed by man m the mrjbip of God,will be ex- 37 exeptedofGodycxept we have a plain word to warrant the fame, Accepted which if it may, I would deftre to know of yen upon what account he Except may perforin it fo at that it may be exepted, feeing he hath no Accepted word to warrant it , and if he may do nothing without a war- Surely rant from the word of God, at furlj he may not , / would defire to k*towt of you , what word , or warrant you can give from the words of Chrifl {for thefe your praclifes) whofe Miniflersyou pre* tend to be. For forcing of maintenance from thqfe that are not willing to 1 pay it , 'it going again ft there confeience, and fluing them at the Their Law to recover them, Ic For your owning of the Miniftry of the Go/pel of (fhrifl upon an 2 account of your humane learnings Arts and Scynces, and other Sciences 4 quired parts recivedfrom Oxford, or Cambridge, or fuch ike Acquired ScooUi of humane learning, Schooles 3 'What warrant you have from the words of Chrifl for your Baptifing babtifing of Infants before thej do attully believe. Actually What warrant you have from the words of £hrift for admitting 4 perfons to the Lords Supper before they are babtifed according to Chrifl s inflitut\on,and holding forth the works of he-line ffe towards (jod and righteoufneffe towards men in a word, before they are born of water and the fpirit, or at leaf} fo far as man can fldge them fo to be. What warrant have you from the ward of God to own y our f elves y

and if any are not lafting till the ' end of the world, I defire to know of you, which they are, and if all are lasting fo long, then I would defire to know, why they are not prallifed as they ought to be, and what excufe wefhall have at the great day for not obeying of them, Whether that the babti&ing of believers is not the Command of Chrift, pracli fed )by the Apofties, yea, or no, and left upon record for m to follow and Imitate till his fecond coming, Whither that any plain injunction , or command in Scripture doth not (for its time) bar any perfon from the praCtifing of any thing to the contrary , although he hath no exprefe word that bids him that hefhall not do the contrary, as for example, whether that Where (fommand mentioned in Math .7, 1 2., wher Chrifi bids his people that they fhould do the fame things to others that they would others do unto them, doth not this enjoy ne them,that they (hall not doe thofe things unto others, that they would not have others do unto thena- f elves y although there is no fuch word in Scripture, and whether all other Commands of the Gofpel, are not of the fame nature : Difciples Chrift Jefa doth not fay unto his Defciples in lohnthe 14.1 5. if you love me, do nothing contrary to my Commands, but if you love me, kfep my (Commandments, Thefe Queries I have thought good to put to you, and they are my judgement, and if you can contradict them by plain Scripture, Jjball be glad to fee it ; if not then acknowledge the truth, & leave of all thofe your eroinom praliifts afore mentioned, and glorife God by fubmitting unto the truth, as it came fom the mouth of Chrift andbis Apofties , as they did of whom the Scriptur bareth record inLuVc the 7th, the 29, To Baptifing Erroneous Scripture Bearcth J%ud res no Judgement , 39 To begin where yon end,thefe Qnarres you have thought good to put to me ■* your laft words ot your firft page ,. men- tioned that good and old way of baptiiing believers, and in- timated that the efpecial difference betwixt us; and there- upon,you defired of me, to anfwer a few Quaeres , which I thought,.(asIhadjuftocca[ionCotodo) would have been about that matter. But having read them, I finde them to extend as well to the Lords Supper 5 yea, to any, or all, the worthip and fetvice of God, and your Quasres not few,but ve- ry many, as if, with the Scribes and Pharifees you meant to urge me, or pofe me with many Queftions , thereby to take me in my anf wers ; or would draw me of from my other im- ploymeuts, to give you Anfwers to your Quaeres. I fay no more, but I think upon an old faying, that a ( ) man may move more Queftions in an hour, than a ( ) man can an- fwer in a year. But what need my anfwer, when as you add ^Xhefe quires are your judgement : this is ftrange Englifh , and fomewhat near to Non-fenfe , that Quires fhould be any mans judge- ment ; your Quaeres do not affirm, or deny any thing as from you> how then do you fhe w your judgement ? you propound your Quaeres to me , that you may rather know mine , than reveal your judgement. If your Quaeres be your judgement, youare of the judgement of a fort of Philofophers ,. called Scepticks , who ever were doubting and quehVoning all things, or of the later people, called Seekers , who are onely feeking,and enquiring,and quaering,as you are for two Whole pages together. arid* fo all the people and Publicans juftified God , being ba- ptiled With tbebaprfme of Uhn, But now, Sir,why did you not here, why do you not elfewherc, write out the words of the Texts, you cite and alleadge ? at leaftwile , why do you not turn to the Texts, and read them your felf at leaftwife ? Surely if you did, or had,you would never quote them:Thcre Comes now into my minde a palTagc of yours, in the laft page of your Letter, added by way ofexcifc>or apology ; That f or want of limey oh have not written cm all the wtrds of all the Scr'pt tires that are qmatcdy yttyott would ifitreat me to look, them and Citing Texts without the words, 4 1 andfer'i ottjly to weigh them, that wherein you have erred,! may in» form you. Very well, I thank you, you will finde me work, whileft you fave your felf the labour : but you will get nothing thus ; for by your not writing out the words of this Scripture (and qthers) and your not looking them, I fufpecr, or noc weigh- ing them ferioufly, I am fure, (all which I have done,at your intreaty ) I may, and can inform you, firft that you have er- red in not quoting the very words, which if you had done, and write them out,you would in the while you were writing them out, have difcerned your errour, how that they made nothing to die purpofe,you quoted therafor,as I have ihcw'd already: Secondly, That yon do therefore erre, not knowing the Sen- ftftresias our Saviour tells the Sadduces , nor the power ofGod^ Math«*2.39. Iq I add,not the truth of God;&: as m the refur- reftion they neither marry nor are given in marriage ; fo in the truth , they neither doubt , nor are given to doubts : you would have me glorifle God in the truth,as it came from the mouth of Chriftand his Apoftles , and I ice and read no- thing but quarter, as they come from the pen of your (elf, and your Afliltants ; I fhaii not glor fie you for quaeres , nor God tor (uch truth : The people, in the Text you quoated, juftified God, (you are miftaken in the very words,for want ofwritingthemoutof theverfc,) being baptifed with the baptifme of Iohu , after they were refolved from Chrift what a great Prophet lohn was, not before , whileft they were in fufpence and quaeres about him : Iwiiladviieyou, as well as inform you, to look to your felf and your Tenets better, and view them more (erioufly in the glalle of the Scriptures , and thofe Texts thereout you makeufeof, lead they nothing confirm what you alleadge them for, but rather refute you, and io you be judged and condemned, both from gods, and your own mouth too. I fear alio, it was not for want of time , that you wrote pot out the wjrds, (for truely, fince I heard of your being imployedin writing unto me, you have had time enough to write out the words of your Texts, and to have looked into them better,and weighed them more ferioufly:) I fear rather G it 4 2 Citing Texts without the words, k was for want of Candour and Ingenuity , or (it may be) ic wasanexcefTe of policie and fubtiitie rthat you would not write out the words of your Texts* at length, but in figures onely, leaft the intelligent Reader might the fooner fee the invalidity of the proof , and the impertinencie of your quo- tations : but rather, feeing a Chapter of an Evangelift cited, and the verfe named, and taking them upon truft and credit, might give the more allowance and approbation, to the point in hand, I remember when Briefs come to us to be gathered, they defire, for the better and truer carriage of the monies colle- cted, that the (ummes fhould be fet down andindorfed in words at length and not in figures ; But you here, and elfe- where throughout your Letter, fet down your proofs and Texts, in figures (moft an end) briefly* and not in words at length,whether in any good carriage of the truth,or truth of good carriage, whether for want of time, or in a time- of want, I leave it to others to determine : Men that onely take up the glade into their hands, and fuddenlylay it down a- gain, and do not look themfeives in it,and weigh^nd confi- der their face in it feriouily and truely, ftiew thereby, they are loth to fee the (pots, defects, and deformities therein. . I have faid the more of this your catting of figures ,-both here and elfe where,, before the eyes of your Reader ; h is once for all, and I mall not touch upon it again, if I can abftain. But I will afcend up, and return unto your quaeres , having all this while been at the end and bottom of them. I have read them again,anddo not remember, that ever, in the compafle of two fheets of paper, or in but two pages, I met with fuch naif- writings, mif-reckonings,Scmif-orderingS} As for your mif-writing of your words (fometimes to the per- vcrting of the fenfe of them) I have noted & corrected them in the Margent of your quaeres^and intend not to touch upon divers' other Pfeudographies , though fparfed up and down every where in your fheets; becaufe I will not fpend my time with flapping of flye6*or fly-blow my Paper with fuchfmaU lcr and petty gnats of Obfervations ; onely perceiving in you an inclinat'on rather to print what you fhali fay, I did it to fit your qua:res the readier for the Prefie,attd to fave the Cor- KMif- pumbrhg Andmifordcrivg^ttmes. 4 3 Corre&our ,or Over-feer of the fame (6 much labour in his Errata's : And laftly* to give you a pattern, and let you a Copy, after which, you may amend and re&ifie all the reft, and thefe very words ellewhere. The fecond is, mif-rec- koning of your Numbers, and that very pittifully, this is fomewhat worfe than mif- writing at your words: for though (perhaps) he cannot write and fpell his words right, yet every Countrey-man can tell his Geefe,and reckon right. But you make 1 4 quakes of your laft Numeration , whereas there are but 1 3 . I pray tell your quaeres again,and fee if it be not fo; hath not the Fox (think you) ftolen away the 7th. Goole, quaere, and run away with it? you may do well to run after it, and look it up, and fet it in its place, or it may be, you repent of ycur naming of a 7*. quaere id youLfuft Nu- meration > and therefore would purpolely, and penitently omit and leave ouc the 7c'1. guaere j in your fecond , for that, that Number cometh up too nigh to the liberal Arts and Sciences, which are (even; and to the leven wife-j-nen or Greece, with which, and whom you defire no acquaintance* or knowledge, but diiclaim them, as appears in your fecond quaere. The third is, miforderingofyour matters, and that very fhamefully : Your firft 7. quaeres are all ((etting afide fome interruption in the middle of them) about the Commands and Examples ofChrift,andhis Apoftles,and Dilcipks in the matter of Gods W or fhip, without the Traditions and in- ventions of men, going on, and fucceeding (ome what order- ly. But then the 6m inftances (which begin the fecond Nu- meration) as the maintenance ol Mrs. in the 1 . the right of the Miniftery in the 2. Baptifme of Infants in the 3. Admit- ting the wicked and unbaptifed to the Table of the Lord in the 4. Our being Paffours of Churches in the 5. Or for- cing people into our obedience in the 6, They are noc all (if any) matters and parts of Gods Divine Worihip ; nor are they all (if any) mere traditions and inventions of men,ind therefore your proceeding is confuted difordcrly, and imper- tinent. Then again, after all thefe, in your 8. quaere you are a- gain upon the Commands ofChrift and his Apoftles , and G 2 0Llr 4 4 # if ordering tfqutres . ourobediencc,wkhoutfettingour inventions againft them. And again, in the 'me of the firft, and fome of the fecond magnitude. The (even quaeres of the firft multitude, being all of the Commands and Examples of Chrift and his Apoftles; Take out of the fecond multitude, the S.9. 10.12. 14. quaeres, and joyn them unto the 7. quxres of the firft multitude , io they make up a good and Harmonious Contort ; as being all of the fame matter. Then again, take the 11. and 13. qv seres of the fecond multitude, and bring them back, and place them nex«: after the 3. quaere, being all of the fame matter, about baptifme, fo there will be a very good order and concord between them, and as Birds of a Feather, will ftand together , as we (ay. Asforthe 1. S.4. 5.6. quaeres of the 2d, multitude, thefe alfo need a little better ordering ; for the 2.(liould have been the 1 .$c the 1 . the 2. our Miniftery (hould have been quasred by your firft, and our maintenance in the fecond place , for G 3 • this 4 6 Mifdrdtred^xries ordered. this floweth from that * and followes as a confequenc upon it. So the 5.fhould have been the 4. and the 4. the 5. our being Paftours of our Churches mould have been quired by you, before our adminiftring the Lords Supper to our peo- ple? this belonging unto that, as an appendant duty, as like- wife the 6l.K of keeping 'them in obedience unto the efla- blifhed order of our Church. Thus, I have given you a caft of my Office > and (hewed you a trick of Art (I learned at the Schools and Univerfity) and have helped you at a pinch and lofle, to rank and order yourqu*res (before a fcattcred,difperfed,and confvfcd rou:,) every one into his proper place and (ration, and under its right colours and Commanders ; and now they ftand like two gallant orderly Troups of quseres, ready to charge with a queftioi bullet, every one who comes in their way; and now I know where to finde my adverfary, if any of thefe quaeres have the metal and courage to be fuch , and do oppofc. I confeiTe, I (hould not have (rood thus long amongft thefe Atomes, or have fo much as oblerved, or mentioned them> I mean your mifordenngs of your matters, as alfo your mif- reckoningsofyour Numbers, and the mil-writings of your words of thefe quaeres s but that I intended it for your good, to (hew you at fir(t,even by thefe your lefler flips and er- rours, (as I have done already, and (hall do hereafter by greater) what want and mile you have of fome of our School humane learning,or our llniverfity Arts & Sciences which you fo jeer and fcorle at in your fecond qi^re of the fecond multitude, as I called it : It appears indeed, that you were never, either well turor'd in a Colledge, or matter 'd in a School;a little time fpent there,m;ght have done you much good } Clarks and Scriveners wire well as to the found and Character, bi t SchoJlcrs and Univerfity men » write trorly as to the Letters and (enfe of word> : All rational men and Rultids can tell their lheep, and order their Plough, buc onely Academick?, Arithmeticians and Logicians, can rec- kon righr, and reaton well,or hold an argument: In a word, the Aits and Sciences of Cambridge and Oxford have no o- ther Qudries to the qu<(rijl out of his quxrits, 47 theren:mies, but naturals and hgrams of the Counrrey, But I come to your quaeres, now that they be martialed into their order, and ftand together, as they fhould do, in battel Array : and firft to them of the fir ft multitude. Which the more I look them in the facc?, and outward appcarances,the kfTe I fear them for enemies and adverfaries ^they feem ra* ther to fmile upon us , and our practices, than to frown ; and yet I know, you intended them, Sc therefore lent them forth as your great Goliaths,todefie the whole hoft dElfrael, and to decry our Mimftery and maintenance > our baptifme and our giving the Sacrament, our very Rectories and Paftories of Churches, which at the end of your quires, you call our erroneous pra&ifes , and would have me leave of upon the very naming and mentioning of the qurres,as upon the fight and approach of that Philiftine ? all Ifrael were afraid Sc fled. But your quires are fo far from frighting me ,or fighting mc out of thole pra6tifes,as that rather-they hearten & confirm mc in them .-and what if I fhould joyn iflue with you in them ,and anfwer to the 1 »3 .4*8. 1 a. 14, affirmatively as you mean them to the 1.5 A7.1 o. ncgatively,as you intend them*. I fhall thereby give no advantage to your caufe,nor take any prejudice to ovr pracTiLes, as fhall very clearly appear hcre^ after. But I will firft" run over your quxres particularly , . and out of each of themywill return you fomc quaeres,- fo to make fome work for you to anfwer ,as you have done for me. Yea, and J will give you a rcafonand ground of my quaeres to you, which yet you have not done oty ours to mc. From your 1 . quaere to me ?I return and make thefe quaeres to you. 1. Why do you jovn together the Commands of Jefus Chrift, and theexamplary pra&iles of his Apoftlcs' &: Difci- pks in a like degree, when as they are infinitely before, and f pereminent to thefe, ..as God is above man , as the Son and Lord above the iervant ofthehoufe, as the Matters Copy, before the Schollers writing > 2. Why doyou mention onely the Commands of Chrift and the exemplary pra&ilesof his A potties , written in the New Teftamenc ? were there not Commands of Chrift (though tsfi Jtuxre to the qufirifi eat of bis qu&res. (chough no prattifes of his Apoftles) written ia the Old Te- ftament likewife ?and were they not alio written for our learning and imitation ? what then doth S.Peter mean, when I Pet.i.U. he faith, thefpirit of Chrift teftified before-hanj, and fpake in the Prophets? concerning his fajferings to come} and doth not the Authout to the Heb. 3. 7* call that the voice of Chrift, that fpake Pfalm 9 5*7 . and 'Httmb. 14. 22, is not Chrift fefifa, the fame j eft erday and to day^andfor everythe King and Commander oi, and in his Church) both that ot of the Old Teftament , as this of the New ? and are not hi; Com- mands every where written in the old Teftament ? 3 . Why onely the Commands of Chrift, and the exem- plary prattiles of his Apoitles and DifcipleSj when as Saint Paul , to whom you allude, faith in that Text, %om. 1 5. 4. Whatsoever things were written afore time were written for our learning ? and when St. Paul faith, they were -written for our learning (and no more) why do you add , for our learning and imitation ? were indeed the Commands of Chrift and the pra&ifes of his Apoftles, both of them written for our learning and imitation , both of thefe ? had you not fpoken more truely, at lcaft wife , more properly of both , if you had (aid, the Commands of Ghrift were written for our learning and obedience, and the exemplary pra&'fes of Chrift and his Apoftles, and Difciples, for our learning and imitation. 4. Wherefore is this your quarre ? for Who of us, and in what do we refufe,the Commands of Chrift, and the Exem- plary pracHes of his Apoftles and Difciples, written for our learning and imitation ? From your 2. quaere 1 return ,. and make thefe quaeres unto you. 1 1 . Why here the Commands and Examples of Chrift and Difciples are thus intermingled and jumbled together,fo thac the Reader cannot know whofe be the Commands , and whofe be the Examples, and whofe Difciples you mean ? 2 . Why do you apply, or limit , this, of not adding to, or . detracting from, unto the Commands & Examples oi Chrift and Irs E>ifciplcs; (for fo you would lay) when as ks ufually fpoken of the whole word oi God) and the Scripture to ftiew the perfection .thereof, as in Dent. 42, and 1 2. 3 2. compared with £ft* ns U the\qu*rijl out of bis qtura. 47 with Revel. 2*. 1 8. and 19. or arc the Commands and Ex- amples of Chrift and his Difciples, the perfect and whole word of God and Scriptue ? 3 . Where is itfaid , or written, that we muft not add to,or dctraft from, neither the Commands nor Examples,neither of Chrift nor his Difciples Ms it anywhere forbidden and made a fin ? 4. Wherefore is this your Quaere f who of us,and in what do we add to, or detract fro»a the Commands and Examples of Chrift and his Difciples > prom your 3d. Quaere 1 return and make thefe Quaeres un- to you. m 1. Why do you call the fame Commands of Chrift and his Apoftles Joyned with their Examples and pra&ifes, fuf- ficientfor our rule and direction* when as in the phrafe of Scripture,the whole word of God is but fo called, as in Gal. 6t 1 ^compared with » Tim.z. \ 5 .1 6,17. Therefore called CV*- wnical Scripture, becaufe it is the Canony or rule of our faith and manners ? or are the Commands of Chrift and his Apo- ftles joyned with their Examples and pra&ifes the whole, and total rule unto us ? and if they be not , how are they ful- ficient for our rule and d ire&ion ? *i Why do you here name them onely his Apoftles, and above, his Difciples onely, and clfewhere , his Difciples and Apoftles ? were all thefe the fame perfons/ were there not but twelve Apoftles onely ? and were there notfeventy Difci- ples efpecial ? and are not all believers in Chrift, yea, Profcl- fors onely, called his Difciples? are all thefe alio, and their Commands and Examples, fufficient for our rule? 3. Why do you exclude the Tradition and Inventions of men, when as for the one, -St. ?<**/, a-Tfo/la.ij, bids and commands them to ft and faftyand hold theVradmotts , which ye have been t aught ^ whether bj wordy or our Epiftle ? doth not the Apoftlc intimate, yea, fay, that the Commands of Chrift and the Apoftles, are not fufficient without Traditions of men, orelfe why would he have the Thefaloniam to hold them, and ftand fail to his Traditions and inventions too, for ought we know? Arc there not Traditions and inventi- ons of men, agreeable, as well as contrary to the word of H God, 48 J£ti when you excluded them > what Traditions and inventions of men you (pake of ? 4. Whether they be not as fnfficient for our rule and di- rections without the Vifions and Revelations of Quakers, yea, and without the usurpations and intrusions of you, and your gifted brethren, as well as without the Tradition and inventions of men ? 5* And wherefore is this your $4. Quxre ? who of us, and in what do we hold the Tradition and invention of men a- v gainft the rule and dire£tion of Chrift and.his Appltks ? or wherein do we not follow the rule and direction of Chrift and his Apoftlcs in iheirJCommands and Examples ? From your 4«h,Quaere I return, and make thelc Quaeres un- to you. 1. Why do you make the queftion , whether that Chrift Jefus is not as faithfull qver his houfe,as a (on in giving them clear directions how tobu'ld his houfe,and of vwhac mate- rials, as Mofes was' in the houfe as a fervant, when as it is moft clear and expreiled, that he was far more faithfull, and therefore is counted worthy of more glorie ? Is not the fon more faithfull in the houfe than a lervant? was not Mofes fometimes douMulI and difohedknt , but was Chrift ever £0 ? rJiiQ a I - 2. When Chrift is (aid to be as faithfull over his houfe as a (on, why do you fayyas Mofes was in the houfe as a fer- vant ? why do you fay in the houfe,when as Mofes was faith- full in his houfe, that is,in Chrifts.houfe i dothnotthis make more for the honour of Chriftrthat, it was his houfe wherein tjMofts was faithfull,than that it was the houfe -? who wrefts and corrupts the Scripture now ? for is it not plainly and exprcflyfet down, in H>£.3.5, Mofes verily was faithfull m alibis konfe M. a fervant > 3 . W hat clear d i regions how to buildliis houfe , and -ofc what materials did Mofes give as; a fervant , who oncly re- ceived them from Chrift the fon ? did he not rather difpence than give, or give at the fecond hand,what Chrift gave him at the firft hand ? and fo was not the fakhfulneffe of Chrift far different, and differs irrtbe matter of building and -dire- cting ?; gu&rics to the qumft out of his qumes. 49 ding ? do you regard the fenfe, when you quote words of Scripture ? 4. How , and of what materials doth Chrift build his houfe , as you fay, when as you fay in your 6th. Quaere, its Chrift's fpiritual houfe,and you called lit in your upage, a fpiritual building ? is a fpiritual houfe built up of materials ? do you not wifh ,you had been at Cambndge,oi Oxford, and Itudied Logick,or fome of our Univerfity Arts and Sciences awhile , for the better refolving of thefe Qtteres ? J. VVhoof U5,and in what do we deny Chrift to be as faithfull over his houfe , as a fon in giving them clear directi- ons how to build his houfe 5 and of what materials as Mofes was in his houfe as a lervant ? and therefore , wherefore is this your 4^h. Quccre ? From your 5 th. Qusre I return, and make unto you thefe Quaeres ? 1. Whether there was not (bmething concerning the worfhip of God in the Law, given 10 the Jews, built up with arguments, and daik quftioiiable coniequences , contrary to the Command of Mofes and Solomon, when "Hjtdab and sAbihti took Cenfers and offered ft.ange fire, and when Core-> *Dathan,2.nd Abiram rebelled,and fought the Priefthood,up- on that argument and confequence mentioned, Nttmh.i 6,3. and 14. and fo like wife when Jeroboam [ct up two Calves of Gold, the one in Dan, the other in Beth-el, upon the like ar- gument and confequence as is mentioned, 1 Kings 1 2,26,27, Is it not apparent there was, as to the fa&? fhould not you therefore have put into the Quaere, rightly built up, or built up as a part of the worfhip of God ? for do you not read that men build on this foundation Qold, Stiver-, precious ft ones i fo Wood, Hay, and Stubble, 1 Cor.3.i2» will you never learn to place your words, and expreile your felf better , and plainly ? 2* VVhether any thing concerning the worfhip of God in the Law given to the Jem, was built up at all according to Command given by Mofes, or Solomon, feeing Math 1 5. iy. in vain do they worfhip God^t caching for 'Doftrints the Command- ment t of men ? H 2 3.VVhac 50 Sl**ru to the qutrtft e»t of his qutres. 3 . What dp you mean by arguments and dark queftio- nable corlequences ? whether fuch as you cannot under- ftand, or fuch as have no light in them ? would you not ra- ther have writcendark arguments? and queftionable conie- qrences ? Co long, as they be arguments , &c clear coniequen- ces and unqueftionable, may they not be imployed in hold- ing up, if not in building up lomethings concerning the wor- (hipoiGod ? and are thefe, or the building withthefe, con- trary to Command givea by Mofes and Solomon > 4. But wherefore is this your 5d*. Quaere ? for who of us do fo,and what things concerning the worfhip oi God in the Law given unto xkizjews are built up(by us) with arguments and dark queftionable confequences contrary to Command given by Mofesy or Solomon* From your 6th. quscre 1 return, and make thefc quaeres un- to you. U What a queftion is this, whether we under the Gofpel have more power to build Chrift a fpiriual houfe by argu- ments and confequences than the Jews- had their temporal and typical houfes under the Law, contrary to command gi- ven fprth at firftS when as neither we nor they have any power to build the onhow were they Ty- pical, as well as Temporal 3 and had not the Jews power to build them, when as they built them i and is this power con- tra- gutrts to the qu&rifi out of bis quires, * x trary to the command given forth at firft? when as they had a command given them at the firft to build them, and to im- ploy then* power that way ? Or do you mean by the Jews Temporal and Typical hou- fes, their Temple, and their Synagogues * If fo , then tell me what, and where was the Command to the contrary gi- ven out at firft, that they could not build fuch houfes ; I ask where given out at firft, as yon fay, and in which of the books ot Mofes do you read of Synagogues , or the Tern* pie? 4. But wherefore alfo is this your 6*\ qrsere* for who of us take power to our felves to build Chrifts fpiritual houfe under the Gofpel by arguments and confequ«nces contrary to command given for them at firft, or laft t From your 7th, quarre I return, and make thefe qr seres un- to you. 1 . Whether you do not rather mean, accepted of God, than exceptedjor what is your meaning, it being a word I underftand not, nor ever read * a* If fo you mean, as I believe you do, then whether do you mean accepted of God, aspart,or matter of his worfhip,. which is performed by man in the worfhip of God, without a plain word to warrant the fame, or accepted as a decorum, or order which is by man performed, in the fame worfhip, for the better ftirring up of mans devotion, anoT adorning of Godsferrice* 3. May he not do it upon that aforementioned account, without a plain warrant from the word , when as* the word is not fo particular as to every gefture, and babite, and other circumftances in the worfhip of God * is k not enough , that we have for fuch our performances in the worfhip of God, that General and inclufive word and warrant, which is gi- ven us, 1 £V.r 4.40. Let all things be done decently and in crdert' hath not God left fome fuch things , to the prudence &piety of the Guides and Governours of his people, according to that I CVr.ii, 34, And the reft will J fet in order when J cwie? 4* But wherefore alfo is this your 7th. qusere ? for who of ms, and in whatpra&ife$,do we perform any thing in the H. 3 worr 5 2 Qu* res to the quart ft out of his qums. worihip, (as the worfhip of God) without a plain word and warrant of God? . From your 8th. qusre I return and make thefe quxres un- to you. It is true , you here name and bring in 6. particular pra- ctices of ours (To you call them) as fo many inftances, for which you pretend we have no word, or warrant from God, no Command, or Example from Chrift,or his Apoftles : but this is very abruptly, diforderly, and amethodically done to bring in (uch, before you have done with thele, and finilhed your Quakes about the commands and words of Chrift and his Apoftles. I ihall therefore proceed according to my bet- ter ordering and methodizing of you $nd your matters, and having difpatched the 7. Quaeres of your firft multitude , or number, as I called them for diftin&ion fake , I ihall go for- ward unto the 8th. Quaere of the fecond number , or multi- titude, and the reft, which are of the fame matter and con- cernment with the firft 7. namely about the Commands and Examples,the word and warrant of Chrift and his Apoftles, deferring your fix inftances uncill the end of thefe. 1 fay therefore again, that From your Sth# Quxre, I return , and make to you thefe Quaeres. 1. Whereas you Quaere, whether -it is not bur duty to walk in exa£r obedience to all the Commands of Chrift, do you mean moral,Ceremonial,Judicial Commands of Chrift? For are not all thefe the Commands, and are not thefe all.the Command* of Chrift ? 3. Are we not delivered from the Law, as a Covenant of righteoufneffe , feeing Chrift # the end tf the Law for rightc- ojtfitejfe to every one that bel'teveth^ Rom.10.4, which is there-, fore termed the Law of faith, Rom. 3.^7. • 3. Though it be our duty ftilltowalk in obedience of the moral Law, yet arc we not delivered from the Rigour of it. one part whereof is perfect and cxacl: obedience to all of it, or upon the iail thereof, death and condemnation ? 4. Is not our exaft obedience rather onr fincere willing- neffe,or ready indeavour to do it, (o that it may better be cal- led a limping, or halting, than a walking > 5. Why Qutres to the qumftom of his qftares, 5 $ : 5. Why do you poft over your bufinefls* (for I think you were in hali when you wrote this?) for doth not the Pro- phet E&ekj-el fycikoi Manajfes building Altars to 5^/ in the houfe ot the Lord, and Altars for all the Hoft of heaven in the two Courts of the houfe of the Lord ? the which though it were the invention of Mari,or Manajj'es^ yet plain Idolatry was the poft 8c thte (h old there meant,fct up,& by,8c brought in to the true worihip of God. And now, how will you be able to (hew thofe inventions of men yon mean are any piece of this pony any part of Idolatry let by the worfhip of God* which'are onefy for the fetting of it out, comely, and in or- der, not implying any weaknefle, or deficiency therein? or added for any fupportingVot upholding of the frame, asutu- ally is, when a poft is fet by a poft? . ■ . . 6* Andlaftly, why do you write, fetting our pofts by Gods pofts, when the Lord himfelf by the Prophet (aith , fitting tbenr'^ofi%y my pofts} h it becaufe you would fhew your will and' skilHn multiplying and exaggerating the fins and inventions of men, arid making them more than they are, more than the Lord himfelf makes them ? or would the Lord fhew 'you your weaknefle herein , by iuflering you to tall into the fame fin* which you tax (though mjuftiy) in others, namely the adding to the word which is done alfo,, if you add bdt one Letter ? and if yoivfay^s it not a little Oney to add-but a Letter , I could tell you, that adding to ,or lea- ving out of one Letter, yea, a very Accent in one word, raifed, and brought into the Church of God,great divifions, ^ea, ertdurs and 'Here'fies,^ which words If hall not here fet down, beeaufe they are Greek,- and yon c&kti&t abide, be* caiife you cannot under ftand fuch Humane and Uni verfity, cither Artsyor LanguagesJ) yea,more , as you add a Letter to the one of the words ,ib you take away a Letter from the other of the words, for Where God faich po'ft\ in the lingu- lar, there you. write pofts, in the plural Number^ again,. Where God faith pofts in the plural* there yon write poft in the Angular;-; lookintO the Text, and fee if it be not fo ; I believe ^ou alluded to it > though you cited it not .-and if this be not to add to the word, and to take from it, I amiru^ ftaken, and have mifadded : for it addetluo the fence in the one,, ■ ■ ■ ' I— ■ ' " '■ '■ ' — -"■" ■ ■ 54 Quires to the qudrifi out of his quxres. one, and taketh from the fence of the word, in the other : For whereas God mentioneth , their poft ? (and fo , their threlhold) in the lingular, he meant that if it were but one piece, or a£t of ldolatty,or (it you will) one humane inventi- on added unto his worftiip , it was a haynous and finfull thing ; you by adding and faying* there,pofts,in the plural, fcem to make it but Co, if they be many pieces and a&s of Idolatry, and many humane inventions : And again , where- as God mentioneth, his pofts, (and fo his threftiolds) in the plural, and meant, that to none of all the parts and a£ts of Lis worlhip, is any humane invent ion,or Idolatrous fcrvicc to be added and fee by, you by taking away, and laying, there,polt, in the lingular, feem to imply as if it were, onely, not to be done, in tome one lingular part* or ad oi his wor- fhip: but I leave this to you to poft of this matter as well as you can. AncH (hall make work indeed for you (and for myfelftoo) if thus I proceed. I may be briefer in the next, becaule I have Ipoken of the li bftancc of it before , and your felf have returned and made aniwer to this^usere, in the i»pagc. From your 9. q^are I return, and make you a few quaeres : Whereas you write that you and we arc boi nd to feparate from thole that feparate themlelves from the wayes, pra- ctices, ordinances, and commands of the Lordjefus and his A pottles, I ask you (hlencing here, what we are bound to) whether you Ipake the truth of your f elf, when in the t. page of your Letter, you faid it twice, that you do feparate your felvesfrom the corrupt pra&ifes of our Church ; and again, we feparate but from the corruption* of your Church ^ did you there, all what you were bound to? then are you not oound (as you lay hete) to feparate from them (1 . their per- fons and fociety) who feparate themfelves from the wayes and Commands of JeiusChriir. And if you be bound to feparate your felf from fuch their perfons, tnen you have not hitheno done what you ought, as who have fcparated your felf but from their praitiles as there you affirm'd ? a. Why do you ule fuch a phraCe, of feparating your felf from fuch as feparate themfelves from the wayes, pra&iles, ordinances, and commands of Chriit and the Apoitles , as they Jgftdres to the qu&rift em of his quires. 5 5 they lye written in the word of God ? what, is it to tell us of three fort-- of feparates ? 1 . one, who feparates but from the corruptions of our Church ; a 2d. who feparates from the ve- ry perfons that are corrupt; a 3d* who feparates from the wayes,ordinanccs,pra£hfes,and commands of Chrift? which of all three are you ? which is beft ? in the fir ft page of the Letter mentioned, you are the firft, and there you were beft, if you could have kept you there, and we fhould joyn with you, but in this 9^, quaere you incline to the fecond,and that is worle, and there we leave you ; becaufe Church nor Com- mon-wealth can be without a mixt fociety and converfation of good and bad, as I have fhewed : of the third fort, who is not ? who doth not feparate himfclf from thefe, or fome of thefe? we are all fellow feparates in fin, in departing away from the Lord, and from his wayes, commands, ©v. God himfelf tells us fo, Efai 59.2* Tour iniquities have fcparated be- tween you andyonr God : Truely,you have here much increafed the number of ieparatcs,and are you now bound (think you) to feparate from your felloW-feparates-1 are not you like- wife as well as others, feparate from God by fin.? and (more efpeciallv) by this fin of Separating your (elf from the waves* prattifes , ordinances , and commands of Chrift ? He preile you with Sx..Panl% 1 Cor. 5. 10. if ye will feparate your feif from fuch perfons, as feparate the mfelvcs from fuch wayes, then mtift yon needs go out of thevForld^ yea, and out of your felf, and be feparate from both, you muft go up to the new world,whither no unclean perfon> or thiogcometh and dwelled!. You muft defireto bediiToivcd,and to be with Chrift, and the Saints in Heaven. 3. VVherefore, and to what end are thefe yorr twolaft, as the 8. quaeres ? for who of us, and wherein do we fet our poft by the Lords pofts ; *>.mingle Idolatry , or the icvenci- ons of men, with Gods worfhip, as a part, fupporc, ?.r lupply of it, as is the Prophets meaning? and the 9th. for who a- mongftusdenieththatwe are bound to feparate from the wicked pradifes of men ? yea , from the wicked pei-fons themfelves (who feparate from the wayes, ordinances , and commands of God) fo far forth as they may be dangerous to our faith and others, and with fcandal ; and when k is I not 5 6 gn&res to the qu&rifl out of his quires. not a woiull ncceflicy for us to converic with them, as David complained, Woe to me that I am confira':ned to drvellin McLecb, And to have mj habitation in the Tents of Kedar, Pfal, i j o. 5. it was bis wofull necefliiy ; it was not an unlawfull iniquity , ic might grieve his heart, but it did no: prick his confidence : his conversation was amongft them , but his affection was from them, though prefent in body,yec abfent in fpirit. This is the right feparate? From your i oth, quaere I return, and make you alfo a few brief quaeres. i . Though I hear you make a gain of the tenth, and your fecond qusere of your 2d, multitude ihcwetb, you like it not: yet'what advantage will you get by this tenth qime " I tee not ? for praclife in Dcttrme,or YVorfnip, what is that? had you not faid better and briefer, whether that Doctrine, or Woifhip, which hath not an exprefle word to warrant it, is to be pra&ifed there as you do, whether that praftife in Doctrine, or Wo: (hip, which hath ic not, is to be pra&ifed? or rather, that point, or part of Doctrine, or Wonhip ? a. Do you mean, that it ic hath not an exprefle word , it is not to be pracHed? why then do you fay in your 14th. quarrc, that peopl : muft :;or do thofe things unto others, that they would net have other* do to them, although chey have no exprefle word that bids them the> (hail not do [of 3 . And why do you add, though nev^r [o fairly backt by reaCon and arguments, ic is not to be pra&iled>ani yet in in your laft page of your fecona fhcet, you pray me (.0 an- fwer you by plain Scripture , or by Arguments proved thence ? 4. I> not the Scripture it felf back: with reafons and, ar- guments,and have not the Saints alwayesufed them, how c He Would Job fill his month with arguments ,Job 23. 4. and why did P^»/,ashi^ manner was go into the Synagogue, and three. Sabbath dayes reafonwith the Jews out oithc Scriptures? the point of Doctrine in Ditbure was, whether Jefti , whom Paul preached was the Chrift,or McfTias ? and the point (I will not fay as you, the pracl Ce in Do51rinc and wo r (hip) of Worfhip in queftion was, whether the u .known God whom the Athenians worfhipped, Were the due God ? St. Paid Qu&res td the quArift mt of his quxres. 5 7 St. Paul had no expreiTe word , no politive Text for cither that affirmed the one, &: denied the other in fo many Words and tollable?, yet he rcafoned, and argued out of the Scrip- tures for the one, and againft the others nay, our Saviour (Thrift himfelf having to do with the Saddncesy who allowed onely the $♦ books oiMofes, and being put to them to prove the Refnrrection from the dead, which they denied,holding no Ipirit exifting feparate from the body > but that at death the Souls of men expired,& were utterly extinguished, back'c it, (to ufe your words) fairly by a reafon , and argument, (when there was no expreffc word for it in thofe books) ta- ken out of thofe words, Exod.3 .4. J am the God of Abraham, ofl(a.a,C)rtndof Jacob •• Now faith ChrihS God is not the God of the dead, *.<% of things not extant, or not bein^ in nature , but of the livtng : but God is the God of Abraham, Ifaac^nd Ja- cob } Therefore Abraham , Ifaac , and Jacob , do tmely and really cxift : Therefore their fouls, or their bodies were not utterly cxtinguiGYt, or annihilated in nature, as the S adduces held : Therefore there mud be a Refurre&ion. 5. It is not ( I fuppole) any other reafon , or Argument you mean, is it? than what lies hid, and fecret in the bowels ot the word, to which, in pra&ife of Doctrine , or Worlhip, youoppofe an exprefl'e word ? and you mean Right, Rca- ton,and Argument, do you not* when you fay, though fair- ly backt with it ? and if fuch reafon fairly back^ any point of Do£trine,or Worfhip, and fairly carry it unto the Scripture, or fairly bring it out, is it not as good and practicable , as if the Scriptures bellied it, and great of fuch points of Doctrine and Worlhip, delivered it fell of (uch ? mifkke me not,right reafon is as a Bucket that goeth to the Well that is deep, to draw up water out'of it : an exprefle word, is the WeJMpring that floweth, and runneth of it felf, to every ones view. And - 1 know not yet to the contrary, but that an impiicite word, where there is no expreflejor a Text, where fuch a Doctrine or Worlhip is virtually included, (if there be not any other, where the fame is actually, or verbally contained) may be by right reafon prctfed and urged : But it is no marvel you flight reafon and arguments, who are out of Charity* with the Schools and Univerhtes. I 2 Lafln 5 3 ^udres to the quxrlfl out of his qutres. Laftly, wherefore , and to what end is mis your loth. Qusre? and who of us, and wherein do weprac~tife in Do- ctrine, or Worfhip, baekt onely tairly with reafon and argu- ments , without a word to warrant us, J mean an exprelle word , if there be any, or an inclufive , or implicite word, which is allowable? and diffident, tor the Sons and Daugh- ters of men, which mi>ft give an account of all their actions to the fearcher of hearts and vcinsy&c, as you conclude your Quarre. From your z i^h. and i ^h. Qusere I return not > nor make any Quaere to you, becaufe thefe are about baptifme, as aifo is your 3d. Qrnrre, and fo being one of your particular in- ftanccs againft me, in which you require the command of Chrift, and the example of the Apoftles, I (hall refcrve this untill I come to the reft, and fo handle them in their right and proper place , as I have ordered your matters. And therefore I proceed unto the 1 2*h, and 14th. Quaeres, that are about the lame general iubjett fpoken to before, namely the Commands and Examples of Chrift and his A- poftles. From your 1 ath. Quaere I do return,&: make thefe Quarres: But 1 will rirft touch a little upon the 14^. and la ft quaere, that fofrom this i^th. I may the better make a digreffioii un- to the Doctrine of the Commands and Examples ot Cnrift and his Apoltles? which you mention in the 1 id\ again,as in molt of your former quaeres. From the 14th. I make this quaere to you , why you make a quaere of that , which all men, any thing skilled in Divine matters, hold for an unqueftionable , and unquaerable Rule ? is ic to (hew your unfetlcd and fcrupulous feeker— nclle ? who ever doubted , whether a plain Command in Scripture doth not (for its time) bar any perfon from the pra£ti(ing of any thing to the contrary, although he hath no expreffe word that bids him he fhall not do the contrary? But why put you in {for its time?) do you not fay in the 1 2th. quaere , that the Commands oi Chrift are cvcrlafting, unto the worlds end, 2 1 d fo fo: a 11 time, and is this, it's time ? you are a very good time-fewer, and obferver : And what need here thofe other words, though he hath no exprelle word ? Time was, and that Quires to the qutrift cut of bis quires, 5 9 that awhile ago with you> when an exprefle word mutt be had, or no doing , as I noted in your 1 oth. qusere ; I fee the longer you live, trie wifer you grow, to let go thefe expre(ie words. But you are not much beyond Agri^tCs almoft ; you are but yet the half way of truth and rule ; for doth not aifo eve- ry plain Scripture, that is Negative, debarring any perfon from the pra£tifing of any thing, enjoyn him alio to do the contrary, though there be no exprefle word that biddeth him to do fo ? This is the Rule in general , and full, f for you have given me leave ro inform you where you are not in iuii form. That in Scripture Commands (both of Law and Gofpel) there is to be underftood, and made an Antithefis : (I know not how you will do to underfland the word, for want of fome Univeifity learning, and skill m language>and I know not well how to fpeak it in plain Engli[h for you,unlc{Ie it be) or contra, pofition : as thus, where there is an exprelle affirma- tive, commanding (omethwg to be donc,there is meant,and to be added the Negative forbidding the contrary , and fo of the other fide* where there is a Negative precept forbid- ding expreily any thing, there the affirmative of it is meant and to be added? bidding the contrary. And I will give you thsieafonof ic for your fuller information, which is this: becaufc tne ufe of the Law i; twofold, 1. to (hew fin. 2. to d a u.t to a new life • Therefore to every fin forbidden in the Law, the oppofke vertues are to be added } and aga:n,to eve- ry vertue commanded, the oppofite fins are to be added. Again, as you did but half it in your Rule ; fo you do but halt it in your Example, or Text, you would declare it by Matht-j.il. Cnrift there bids the people that they fhould do the fame things toothers, that they would have others do unto them. I confefle this, according to the aforefaid Rule, doth enjoyn them tharthey (hall not do thole things unto others, that they would not have others do unto themfelves ; but this I except to, which you add,aithough there is no fuch word in Scripture that bids them they fhall not do to other?, what they would not have others do to them ; for look hue unto the 1 . verfe of the fame Chapter, and is there not a I 3 word, 6 o gutres to the quArtji cut of his quires \ word; yea, an exprefle word for the lame Negative y Judge net-, that ye be not judged : So this was n© tit example > or in- fiance to your Rule. And for the other, John 14.1$. wherein you fay Chrift Je- fus doth not {ay unto his Difciples,. if you love me , do no- thing contrary to my Commandment, but but if you love me keep my (Commandments^ doth not out Saviour in faying the latter which is Affirmative, doth he not forbid the former which is Negative,accordingtothe Rule ? and bcfides,there is an exprefle word for the one as well as the other, which is contrary, or beyond to your expreffion , although there be none for the Negative : tor do not all trie Commands of Chrift in the fecond Table, and tome oi the firft Table run in the Negative? Remember I pray, this, both your half and my whole Rule, becaufe there may be ( afterwards) fome ufc made of it ; onely now, becaufe here is a fit place, I will acquaint you with another Rule of our Univeriity Divinity (which I believe you may fcarce have heard of in your Countrey- houfe) and it is both an old, and a Golden Rule : That af- firmative precepts of Chrift do alwayes binde,but not to,or for alwayes : but Negative precepts do binde alwayes , and to, or for alwayes. For (to make it plain for you) you ought alwayes to avoid the evil,' which is forbidden in the Nega- tive Commands of Chrift, and there is no time, or place, where, or when you may doit : and again, you are alwayes bound to perform the good which is enjoyned in the Affir- mative Commands, but not to perform them alwayes, buc onely when there is due time and place ; you may inftance on either fide, and finde both true, r For I am in haft to come to your 12th. Quaere , which to me, in my order fhall be the iaft. And here,to pafTe by your jumbling, and (it may be) jug- ling together the Commands and Examples of Chrift and his Apoftles, and alfo my queftioning and qiwrclling ( I will not fay) quarrelling with you about the fame>I will onely ask you fome few things. 1. Do you enquire of all the Commands' of Chrift? and all the Command* of the Apoftles? 2. Do Commands apd Laws of Christ. 6 1 2. Do you enquire of all the Examples of (Thrift , and all the Examples ot the Apoftles ? 3. Whether they be hfting untillthe fecond coming of Chrift, and the worlds end ? 4. Whether they be of as great force to u?, as to thole to whom firft they were given. 5. And if any are not fo long lading, wh'ch are they > 6. And if all be fo, why they are not all pra&ifed as they ought to be s and what excufe ftiall we make at the great day for not obeying of them ? And fo there isnow an end of your fo often, and vain in- culcating) and repeating of this fame matter, of the Com- mands and Examples ot Chrift and the Apoftles ? to what end and purpofe the Lord knoweth, for you fet down none; and what pofitive, and refolving application will come forth outofyourinquiiitivc,and queltioning Do£trine , we fhall hear (I fuppole) at laft : In the mean time I willexpreile my {elf, and inform you as followeth. Seft, III. Of the Commands and Laws of Qbrifi. IT is moft true, that the LordJ-s our Judge^the Lord is our Law-giver ^ the Lord is our King^ he willfavey as in fo many, and the very fame words the Prophet faith* ifiti 33.22. by, Lord,ufuaily in Scripture,is meant Chrift the Lord. The fame Prophet doth parcicularife him , Ifai 9. 6. and j.towa fchilde is borny to us a Son is given , and the government is upon bis. jhou!dersybejhaH be called wonderfully CouttfellouryAiid of the .>n- creafe of his government there fhall be no endy upon the Throne of David, and uponhis K'/ngdomyto orderyandto eflablifh it with Jufiice &'y/.dgementy henceforth and for ever. And to make this powerfull andabioii!te,the Apoftle accordeth with the P o- phet, 7<*7#.4«i l.lhereis one Law -giver y who is ahleto fave and deftrojy and> the Law it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour , which om Mediatour *t wixt (Jod and man is the man 6 1 Chrifi Commander and Law- giver \ mmChnft Jefus, who is alfo the Media tour of the better, and new Law, and Covenant ^eftabtifhed upon better promt fes than the old, as £*/. 3. 1 9. 1 7>w.2.5.and#>£.8.6« NowasChrift the Lord, is the onely Sovcraign and Sti- pream Commander and Law- giver? fo he and his Laws are onely able tofave and to deftroy , body and foul :fo that we need not fear them, as to the point of falvation h who can, and their Laws, kill the body onely , but we mnft fear bimt who candefiroj both body and foul in Hell^ Math. 1 o. 2 8t And why ? BecauLc ^ which al(o floweth from the former) the Commands $t Lawsof Chrift the Lord, are the onely bands of Confcience that are, and can be impofed upon us With a tye of necefficy, both of obedience, or forbearance, and that under the guilt of fin and high Treafoa against his Majeflty ; and under the pain of death, and eternal condemnation, and conhTcation of all into the hands of his Juiiice* Moreover, the Command^ and Laws of Ghrift the Lord, arc to order and iLablifh Kingdoms with juftice &: J idge- ment,andall Churches with Religion and his "Worfliip. (The Goverment being upon his fhoulder> ,and his Laws able to lave: ) So that they are a Rule for all Laws of Ju- ftice and Judgement to be ordered and eftablifhcd by , and for all Laws of Religion and his Worfhip? to be regulated and proportioned to. I fliall not ftand to prove thefe things; That one Com- mand, Thou ftialt not make to thy felf any graven Image, (for the one,) and that often command, thou lhalt onely do what I command thee, (for the other,) do countermand, or remand away all Laws and conftitutions in Kingdoms, as injuft and null, in the Court of God and his Law, which are not agreeable to it, and grounded there, and alfo all fcrvice* and worships of God in Churches, which arc not feme way- confonant thereto, or deducible there from. The Lords will is the fole Rule of his vvorflv p and Laws: and thefe rauft be the fole Rule of our wills and vvorfhip, without interpofing any will-worfliipofourown,or bring- ing in5 as a f upply, humane inventions and traditions, or Di- vine Vifions and Revelations, as they arc called. Wherefore then have you fo much and often written, the Com. Of the Commxndi and. Laws ofChriji. 6 3 Commands ©f the Lord, the Commands of the Lord al- moft in every of 20. Quxres, even to the drineiTc>or drought of your pen ; as they in Jeremy cried,the Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord, even to the hoarcencfle andftif- nefle of their tongue ? we own the Commands of the Lord as well, and as fully as you, and are as willing to obey them, and as ready to be tried by themasyou,inrefpe£t of our worftup and religious pra£tile?. You intended them, I fnp- pole, as the laying of fome ground and foundation againft us, and the Church of England f, with a great dcalof cla\, mourous oftentation, and boafting Quaeres, but what have you built upon it ? This man began to build and corld go no farther. But I proceed in my work. The Commands of the Lord are diverfly diftinguifhed, and are of divers forts, and diftinft kindes , (you regard nor diftin&ions ,. becaufe you think them a Lirrime ot the Uni- verfity Learning, and you better content your felf with the rultivity confufions. For there are the Moral Commands,the Ceremonial Com- mands > and the judicial CommaridvS of the Lord Iefus. The Moral are either natural, or pofitive. The Moral natural Laws are thofe , which the- Lord hath impofed upon us, even all mankinde, by the very light of Nature and Law of our Creation , requiring us , as to love, fear, and honour God, &c. fo not to Steal , Murder , Lye, &c. And for thefe , they arc lading till the fecond coming of Chrift, or the end of the world (to ufe your own phrafes) yea, they are unalterable, and eternal 5 as being the immuta- ble, and immoveable wifdom,theeveriafting and unchange- able Rule of the righteoufneffe in God -• and (o. its true you add, that they are in as great force to us, as to thofe unto whom firft they were given : nay, Kay more; God never will, never doth difcharge any fromthem, or difpence with any,fo astogive them leave, either to.dp an evil forbidden, or not to do a good Commanded. If I (hould now put a Quuerc to you here,how it came about then, that God commanded Abraham to kill, or flay his {'on Jfaac ? and the Ifraelites/^/^ the Egyptians y according to K the 6^ Oft he Commands and Laws of C hrift. the word of the Lord, Ge».z2.i. Exod.u.%6, did not the Lord here difpcnce with thefe ,and repeal, at thofe times two of the great Moral Commandments againft Theft and Murder? and to, itfeems ,the Commands, Tome of them were, and if fome, in the fame cafe, all other may be altered and changed, and therefore not evcrlaft ing ? How you will anfwer this, that oppofcth your i ith. Quaere, I know not, but I will give you my thoughts ol it. J. As for ■ The Ifraelites {poylingoi the <^gyptai?Si\t was noa£t of Health, or Robbery ; this isthe taking away of a thing from- the right owner againft his will. But now thefe things , which the ffrae&tu* took from the v£g}ptiawywerc nolonges the %/Egjjtom* , becaufe the Suprcam Lord had fiirft fpoyled them ol their Title they had to them, and affigned the fame to the Ifraeliteh as more clearly and fpecially is fet down, Exoi.ii. and fo here is no difpenfing On the Lords part , no tranfgrefiion on their part, as to the Commandment. Be- sides, the Ifraelites are faid to have borrowed thofe things of the */£gyftiaHsya.nd the Lord gave the Ifraelites favour in the tight ol the 9/Egj$iians% fo that they lent them what they re- quired, now borrowing is no Mealing, fay fome ; But for all tfes, borrowing^with no intention ever to repay, is here cal- led fpouii3g,and is nOrbetter than ftealing, and therefore the fcrft anfwer is the bell* Nor did God abrogate that Law, (thou ihalt do no mur- der) by that Command to Abraham • nor Ihould ^Abraham have been a breaker of it, or guilty of murdcr,it he had llain Lfaac^s who was authorifed (I lay not, difpenfed with) fo to do by the Lord, who hath lupream authority in the world, and may juftly as a judge, for fin found in man (as in -lfaac) take away the lives of whom he pleafeth ; yearasablolute Lord , deffroy all things, that for his wills fake he made, though there were no fin, or fault ac all vhath not the Potter power of his Clay,e£r. Befides, this Command to Abraham was perfonal for another end, oncly for a Trial to] Abraham^ and for the manifeftation of hisiaiehyand- not intended for death to lfaac. And this prompts unto me another diftinttion about the Laws and Commands of the Lord, (whichftiil refclleth your Cpeak- of the Commands and Laws ofChirfi. 6$ ing of them Co indiftin&ly as you do in all your Quaeres.) Namely, that they mull be taken and done, not al wayes ac- cording to the Letter and words Cpoken ,but according to the {cope and meaningintended. (Iamfain to decline the Terms of Arc, Sc of the Learned, becaufe of your ignorance of, 8c averfnefle to them.) Like as alfo there is a command of the Lord to a young man in OHarl^i o. 22. Go thy wayfeil whatfoever that* baft^axd give to the foor^and thou (bolt have Ireafwre in Heaven, and come fellow me. Here is a Command of the Lord, back'c,(to ufe your phrafe) with a promife,and made a preparative to another d uty ; mi ft every young man as your felf obferve this Commandment of the Lord? I trow nay, becaufe it is not? nor the obedience thereto propounded according to the litteral found >but the inventional fenfe, namely to try the fincerity of that young mans former pro- feflion, and for the conviction of him touching thole mif-per- fwafions and felf conceipts, which made him truftm himfelf for righteoufnefle. For poverty to that young-man was not any command of moral obedience. So there the moral. Law natural you fee what it is : and (uch are all the Commands of the two Tables (that of the i.Table(the Sabath excepted) being (uch as are impofed up- on man by the very condition of his nature and Creation,thc very light of nature dictating, and requiring them of us , ei- ther to do what is commanded? or to leave undone what is forbidden, as before is let down politive,(o all the Com- mands of thofe twoTkles Ceremonial and Judicial are fuch. And truely, if a pofitive Law might not be moral,how could the determination of the time for Gods vvorfhip unto one day of (even, be poffibly moral ? and befidcs,it is evident by, and confonant unto the true light of nature , or natural rea- fon , that obedience is to be yielded unto all Gods pofitive Laws. Now thefe pofitive Laws of God arc fo called, be- caufe they were impofed after, and upon the being in na- ture, and they are about the Sacraments ,as Circumcifion the Pa{Ie-over,Baptifme, Administrations of the Lords Sup* per, and other inftuutions , which though they are not di- ctated by our voyce of nature immediately, yet mediately they are. 1 . If there were no inftitudon of thefe things by K 2 God, 66 Of the Commands and Laws of Chrifl. God, the Law of nature would never oblige and binde to thefe immediately, as it doth to the love, fear , and vvorlhip ot God,fo that if there were no other Law, we are bound to do them by the Law of nature : but notwithstanding, the Law oi nature bindeth us unto the former mediately, upon prefuppofal, and by the intervention, that our Lord Chrift hath inftituted and ordained them by a pofitive Law, to which we are to be obedient, and that by the light of true reafon and nature, as I hinted before. Now thefe pofitive Laws God may alter them at his plea- fure,fo that at one time it may be lawfull to do that , which was forbidden at another, as you fee in Circumciiion , and eating of meats unclean, Sacrifices,^, yea> and the Gover- nors of Gods people and Church may alfo interpret what is doubtfull in them? both moral, natural,and pofitive b (but ac- cording to Laws.) But they may not abrogate, or difpenfe with any of thefe Law0, no not the pofitive oneseftablilhed by God, concerning the ufe of Sacraments, and things per- tain'ng to Gods fervice and vvorfhip. And whereas it is objected, that Mofes and the people of Ifrael abrogated, or difpenfed with that pofitive Law of God 5 about Circumci- fion for the fpace oi 40, years, it is eafily anfwered, that was no total abrogation, or tranfgreffion of that Law, but a tem- porary, and occafional forbearance of the execution thereof, by reafon of the frequent and dayly removing of the Camp, and journeying of the people appointed of God , they could not attend that while Circumciiion, as the like may be faid forourdifcontinuingand forbearing the Adminiftration of the Lords Supper, in moft places of this Land, by reafon of the Tumults of our vvars,.d indentions ofmindes,and inter- poiitions of Authority about the qualifications of the Com- municants, and the neceffity of prsexamination. Otherwile none of thefe Commands of the Lord, may be trudy broken, or tranfgrefied; no, not for the efchewing of fcandal,or fuch like inconveniences,according to the- general Ruiz ^%om >■$,?>. evil muft not bedone, that good may come. But (as I faid) the Lord himfclf might at pleafurc,reverfe, and ccafe thefe pofitive Laws (and fo hath done, ) in his fee and appointed time , wknefle the Ceremonial Laws of the "jews Of the Commands and Laws oj Chrift, 67 Jews given them in Command from himfelf : See at leafurc, Genef<^9, io» Dan. 9. the laft verfe, Math, n. 1 % Att. 1 5. 8. (jal.7, . Eph. 2^1 4. and 1 5* and whereas Circumcifion, Gen. 1 7. 7. and the Pafteover, Exod, 12.14. and other pofici ve Laws are {aid to be inftituted and commanded by a perpetual Co- venant, or for ever, there is meant thereby, according to the Hebrew phrAie, not an abfoiute duration without end , brc a certain circuit and limited perioj of time, till Sh'.loh cam:, or Chrift appeared. By this time, you having read what I have written, you may finde, how like your felf, unlike a Schcller (for you like a Scholler the worfc, becaufe he is (o unlike your felf whom you love fo well)you have written about the Commands and inftitucions of the Lord , that they are all of them, lading till his fecond coming, and the worlds end, without exception, diftin&ion, or difference made : when as firft. Some of them lafted but untill Chrifts fir ft coming , and the worlds middle , when he came to give the new Law, When as fecondly, fome of them fhall laft after Chrifts fe- cond coming, and this worlds end, as being the eternal wif- dom and Rule of righteoufnefte in God : when as thirdly? fome of them are cealed long ago, as to their praefigurations, and rieceflitiesjand vvorfhip of God in thems when as fourth- ly, all of them , the laft, the longeft of all are gone, as to our juftification and righteoufnefte by them , Gal 3 ,2 1 . as to their curfeand malediction againftus, Gal- 3. 13. and as to obedi- ence fo far as in rigour it is exacted of us GaI. 5.18. when as fifthly, your felf faith, in your fourteenth qu*re,of the in- junctions, and commands in Scripture ; do they not , every •one (for its time) barre any perfon from pra&ifing the con- trary? if every one be for its time, how do all laft out tfie fame time, to the iecond coming of Chrift, and the worlds end ? And again, how could you write that the Commands of Chrift, are in as great force to us,astothofe to whom they were firft given, (and this alfoas indiftin&ly, indefinitely, in- differently, as the former) when as fome of them were onely in force to them to whom they were firft given , and the K 3 Jews 68 of the Commands and Lxws of Chrift % Jews onety bound to die obfervation of them, as the external lerviceoiGad commanded themb and when they were raoft in vigour and force with the Je&sy Darius, the N'mevites , fy- rus, Gentiles converted, they were not impofed upon them. But now neither to them to whom they were fkft given, nor co us are they in any force at all, they are now indiffercne as to their obfervation unto the Jews, or Gwt'des they may re- tain them, if they do it, freely without an opinion of Wor- ihip,in,or neccfliry of them; I except thofe things command- ed , which were figures and ihadows of Chrift to come , the which being fulfilled by the coming of Chrift cannot be ob« {crved, unleffe both Jews and G entiles alfo wtU deny Chrift to be come, Hei,i o.i 8. Though for Come years, the Apoftles, becaufe of their weaknefte, obferved fome of the Ceremonial, as Aft. 16, 3. Paul circumcifed Timotheus ybccaulc of the Jews: But when af- ter the lews reaftumed an opinion or the neceflity of,&: (alva- tion,in,8c by thole Lawsjthen the Apoftles by their Doctrine fhewed them to be abrogated and dead; yea, deadly to the u- fer, as Gal,i 1 1 , and 5. 2- Behold, I Paul fay unto you that if ye be circptmafed , Chrifi fhatt profit yot* nothing , therefore the lame Paul refufed to circumcife 27r*ar,Gal-2-3.. (yea, that ve- ry fame opinion of righteoufnefle, or juftification thereby made, even moral law pernicious and deadly, LukeiS. 14. the Publican went home juftified, rather then the Pbarifte.) Yet the Ceremonial Laws &c commands of God may be read (till ; the Apoftles no where forbid it, yea, (omewhere they fcrch a proof thence •* and that Text of Scripture, Romji 5.4. whatfoever things were written aforetime , were written for our teaming, comprehends that part of Scripture , which con- tained thofe Commands of God, and faith uVy were writtea fot our learning? but not, as you fay in your iQuxre, for our learning and imitation, fo joyning them together confu- ledly, wh ich are d is joy ned, both by the Apoftles, and are di- ftincT: a£ts in themfelves, not appliable to all the forts of Gods Commandsjfomconely being for our imitation, but all for our learning. Laftly, howfoever I have faid, that the Cere- monial and pofuivc Laws of God, as of meats and feafb are now indifferent, if there come not to, and with them, an opi- Of the Cmmmds avd Lam of Chrift , 69 opinion of vvorfhip,righteoufnefIe and neceflity 5 ycc when Cbriftians arc grown up to ripened 8c maturity,let them noc turn again to weak^& beggarly Elements ^Rudiments ^Ordinances of the World, (the former world (SC defire again to conn in bond' age under them, as the Apoftle advileth,iGV.4.9&; filjiie. ' If you fliall intetpofe and (ay, what's all this to your pur- pofcand meaning, as, who intended onely the Evangelical Laws and Commands of the Lord Chrift? why then did you notcxpreile fo much of your meaniag in your words ? why did you write fo generally, and indefinitely, and indiftin&ly, all the Commands and Institutions of Chrift , and that every where through out your papers ? you may fee what ;t is to have none of our Univerfity Art>or Learning • for I do judge charitably of you ; and do think you did it out of weaknclle and ignorance, and not out of cunn:ng and Hypocriiie. And yet as it happened out wellj if you look back a little,you may- meet with your own meaniag, even an Evangelical com- mand alfo : $c moreover,I add^all thatl have faid before or> the Laws and Commands? are alfo to this you* purpoie ; for even the Evangelical Commands of Chrift in the New Te- ftament, arc alfo, and but the pofitive Commands of Quiff, as that of baptifme, &: the other of the Lords fupper,& lbmc other, which I may (with leave for theufe of the word), call alfo moral pofitive, as I did the mttitutioas legal, fome of them, as for the other Evangelical Commands ot the New Teftament, which are, to repent to believe, to lovc,dv. If I may not call them alfo, as I did the legal Commands of the two Tables, moral , natural, (I think I may, and in good fence) I will call them the moral,gracious,or gratuital Com- mands (as they alfo are indeed ). of the Lord Chrift. But your and my Difcourfe is onely of the former : I fay therefore, that the Commandsof Chrift in the Go- fpel about the Sacraments>and die other Miniftrations there, are the moral pofitive Commands of Chrift j and. noc parts of the moral natural 3 1 mean, nature doth not dictate it im- mediately? for if there were no inftitudon of thefe Sacra- ments by Chrift, the Law of nature would nevec binde , or oblige us unto them, to baptifhic, or the Lords. Supper. But yet nature bindeth u* unto them mediately , (as \ faid before about 70 Of the Ccmmwdi And Laws' of Chr'tfi. about the Sacraments of the lews) to wit , upon prefuppofal that (Thrift hath inftituted and commanded them in the New Teftamcnt, as he hath done : it being evident by, and confonant to the true light of nature, and the dictate or right realon,that obedience is to be given to all Gods pofitive Commands. Now, though thefe pofitive Laws of Chrift, are not eter- nal, fo as the moral natural Laws are ; yet they do, and mull: la ft until the fecond coming of Chrift » or this worlds end ; fo our Saviour Chrift faith exprelly of the one , the Lords Sup- per, ycfricw forth, orfhewyeforth (by way of command) the Lords death till he come : fo alfo of the other , go teach the Nations, baptifing them, Cc. and lo, I am with you, unto the end of the world : but you muft underftand this rightly ; thefe laft fo long, not by vertue of any thing in the Ordinances thcmfelves,that is part of the eternal wifcdomey and Rule of lighteoufneiTe in Chrift as God ; (as the moral natural Laws do) but by reafon of Chrift, as Mcdiatour, his will and pleafurcfignified for their continuance throughout all the ages of the Church Evangelical miliwiit ; (as all his o- ther moral pofitive Laws do,and ftiall) you onely run at ran- dam and (hoot at Rovers, and tell us, all his Commands are laftinguntill his fecond coming : But I will tell you farther, that as all the former Abrogations and CciTations of the legal Commands and Ordinances at the full coming of Chrift made no change, or alteration in the eternal wifdomand Rule of rightcoutneffe in God , but in us onely, by reafon of the Son of God his appearing in our felf, and deriving upon himfclf the obligation of the Law as to its perfect obedience, and full punifhment ; no more (hall the Abrogation , or Ccflatioa of the EvangelicaJ institu- tion^ and Commands at our Saviour Chrifts fecond coming, make any change, or alteration in the fame eternal wifdom and Rule of righteoufncfTe in God, but onely in us, by reafon of the Son of God his appearing in the Clouds, and affuming of us unto himfelf into Heaven, there to fee him as he is, face to face, in a beatifical Viiion , without any farther ufe , or need of fuch Minifterial Glaifcs , and Sacramental perfpe- etives. Yea, Something moral in the Ceremon. commands of chrift. 7 1 Yea, more I will tell you, that whatsoever iri the Ceremo- nial Laws and Commands of Chrift under the Old Tefta- ment is Moral , (as femething Moral there is in Come of them) chat the Apoftles made ufe of in the New Teftament and propounded unto Doclrine, as \Cor, 9. 13. 14.^ ye nit know that they -which Minifter about Holy things ylive of the things of the Temple y and they , which wait at the Altar , are par- takers with the Altar i even fo hath the Lord ordainedy that theyy which preach the Gofpel jhou/d live of the Gofpel: And again, what was but Ceremonial, the Apoftles make an Allegorical interpretation ; yea, and a -fpiritual Application alfo ot, as of the Sacrifices and Ofr:rings, R^mt\t.i, \ieb, 1 3 . n . Of cir- cumcifion, Roni.2.1 5. and ib.&c. Of the prieft-hood, 1 'Pet, 29. of the pafIe-ovci\ 1 Cor. 5.7. • So likewife whatsoever in thefe our Evangelical Ordi- nances is eternal, (as it may be , there is fomcthing eternal in them too) the -Saints' in Heaven Ihall have the comfort and benefit of , when aher the worlds end;, and Chrilts fe- cond coming they (hall be paie&ed and confummated : for thefan&ifyingandcleaniingthe Soul with the walking of Water in baptifme, by the word, ihall be perfected, when it is presented to Chrift a glorious Soul, not having fpot, or wrinckle5or any fuch thing, but that it fhould be holy , and without blemilh:and the nourifhing, and ftrengthening of the Soul by the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , fhall be then fully compleated , when it comes to cat of the hidden Manna, and drink of thjfc living wateis,{othat it ihall never hunger more? or thirft more : yea, faith fhall ceale by run- ning up into Vifion; and fo hope, by coming up into fruition. Now abidcth faith y hopeycharityythefe three :, but the great eft of thefe is charity. For charity never faileth . but whether there be prophecies ythey fhall fa';ly whether there be tongue syt hey fhaH ceafey whether there be knowledge itfhallvdnifh away i for we knew in ps.rt and prophecie in part , but when that which is perfect" id come, then that which is in part fhall be done away. T{ow (wip J in pfrty but then 1 fhall know yev en as lam known, i Cor.i3.8.£.c>v. So that that, which is in part alfo,or imperfection, of all thefe ihall ceafe,but the gifts and graces themfelvesfhallruauptoper- iection at laft, as to their eternal, or total. L Thus 7 2 Something eternal in the Evangelical Ctmm.ofChri/}. Thus I have atlength,too muchlength»ordered your con- fufed ftufTe about the Commands of Chrift, and given you a more diftinft knowledge of them»both them under the Old , and them under the New Teftament. I pray hereafter, when you have other occafion of writing of the Commands ■of the Lord, (that all of them are abfolutely to be obferved, that they were all written for our learning & imitation , that they are not to be addedto, or detra&ed from, that every one of them are lading until! the worlds end) remember the particular diftinclions rim I, have here given you and be carefull to write more diftin&ly &c particularly of che Com- mands of Chri ft the Lord, And now (to ftiut up) I will give you a brief recapitulati- on. That befides the Moral Natural Commands of Jefus Chrift, which were imprinted in all mankind arthe firit cre- ation, and defcribed after in the two Tables oi'ftone, where- of fome are affirmative, alwayes binding, but not to, or for alwayes; and fome Negative binding alwayes,. and to, or for alwayes. There were alio Moral pofirive laws and com- mands of Chiift»impoled upon man after the Creation, given to Adam and his poftenty, the Patriarchs and their fuccefr fivi*} Abraham and his Seed, as about Sacrifices, fhedding of bloud, Circufncifion ; and after to the Nation and people of Jfraelya$ the Ceremonial and Judicial Commands, binding onely to them, and that but tor fome periods and revoluti- ons of time, the coming of Chrift in the fleih : There are now alfo certain Evangelical pofitive laws and Commands of Chrift finee, whereof feme are general, as belonging to the whole ChriftianChurch &: pcople,and alfo everlafting as to the ages and duration of the militant Church till Chrifts fecond comingy as namely thofe Commands about the word Sacraments, and f acred Adminiftrations of them : Others are but perfonal and particular, as that to the young man (before mentioned}) go fell all thoti haft and give to the poor ^anX come follow me ; as thofe to the Ap jftleSyheal the fick^ clean fe the Lifers ,raife the dead^c aft ont 'Devils provide neither money, in yottr purfes^neither fcrifrnor fkooes^nor ftaveS)3x\di falute tlQ man by the way, go not into the way of the Gentiles ; which were alfo but Temporary,, during , and iafting onely for thofe dayes The Apeftles fraftifcd ChrjC$m. not their s& rvorfhjp D$&. j$ follow me. Scd IV. Of the Communis of the J$o~ pofiles. Bllt I paffe on now from the commands of Chrift , to the commands of the Apoftles , which you,moft an end,add and joyn with the commands of Chrifts, as diftinct from them, and of like force with them, when as, I muft tell you, (and it will be, I fee ; New Doctrine and Divinity to you) that the Apofties taught, and commanded nothing but what Jefus Chrift commanded them firlt , whileft he was with them on earth : fo was their Commiifion given them, Math. 28.20. Teaching them to obferve all things whatsoever I have commanded you : for which purpofe he promifed to fend them the Comforter ^ which is the Holy Ghofl, (whom the father will fend in my name^ to teach you all things y and bring all things t§ your remembrance whatsoever I havejaid unto yen, Joh. 14. 2 6m you hear and fee, it is, what I have faid unto you , whatfo- ever I have commanded you, not, what I (hall* Chrift left no fuch Authority with his Apoftles of delivering New Do- ctrines and commands of their own , but onely of teaching his, unKrhis Church , as needfull to their falvation. Did not the voyce irom Heaven fay, this is my beloved Son , hear hmx L 2 M*th% 74 The AfifiUs-fraSifed Chr* «w.. not theirs $ mrjhJn DoH-% MAth.17.5. and if you object, that the Son himlelt laid al- fo of his Apoftles, (he that heareth you heareth me) it's not abfolutely and (imply meant? but he that heareth you teach- ing the thing that I have commanded you, fo one Text ex- pounds the other. The Apoftles, and fo all their Succef- fors, and following Minjfters of Chrift , (peaking the words arid Commands of Chrift,are alfo to be heard: but not bring- ing new Mandates of their own, torbe obferved as neceffary to (alvation, or as binding the confidences of Chriftians. If the Apoftles (hould have done fo , they fhould have (inned again!! Chrift , and tranfgrefTed his Commandment to them. But they did diligently obferve it , why do not you pro- duce fome Laws and Commands of the Apoftles, thus need- full and obligatory (bendesthofeof drifts,) feeing you have them fo often in your mouth, and pen ? you have not $ nay, more, you cannot name one of theirs , they are^ all Chrift", whatsoever are to be obferved as neceffary. ' It may be, that runs in your riptide, if not, I will put it into your mindc, which the Apoftle hath 1 Cor. 7. 1 2. to the refi fpeal^I^not the Lord: But he doth not there make a new Law of his own, becatife he commandeth nothing but what the Lord doth command themrbut in regard he had no expreffe and plain Mandate from Chrift; and there was extant no particular and d-ire£t law of that matter and cafe ; and yet even St. Pauls faying, dur taw is, and was the Lords,for that it may be drawn by good confequence, from the Lords Do- ctrine and Law,^^. 9. 3. for if, unlefle it befor Adultery, man, or wife cannot be put away, or part afunder,why then, not for unbelief" in either of the parties. And St. Paul faith, both of himfelf, and all the other Apo- poftles , * Cor. 41 . Let a man fo accvunt of my at the Minifters of Chrifi , and Stewards of the mjfieries of God: now it is the part of Stewardsandd(fpenfers,nottopre(cribenew Laws to the family, but to keep faithfully the Commands and Or- ders of the Mafter of tilt family, and to do (till according to the fame, now no man-is over the houfe, and family as ma- iler, butonely Chrift the Lord : the Apoftles, as before Mo- fes , were faithfull in it , as fervants and ftewards ; if they {hould The dpoft/esprattifed Chr. Com. not thtirs^ mrjhjn Doft. 75 fhould have prelcribed any new Law, or matter of faith , or vvorftup, which they had not directly received in command from Chrift, they fhould have taken upon them to be Lords over Gods Heritage, and exerafed Dominion over their faith, WhicfySr./Win the name of them disclaimed, 2 Cor. I. 24. and St. Peter (though in this point the Pope claimeth from him, whofe Abettour you alfo are herein) dehorteth from 1 Tet.i. ^, and in va'in fhould they have worjh'pped Gody teaching for 'DoUrines the Commandments of men , which their Mafler Chr'ifl difallowethy Math. 1 5.9. Thofe laws then, w if you think, all Chrifts actions and pra£tifes arc for our Imitation, and tu be ob- ferved ? fo you write, and fo you mean, I fuppofe, or elfe why did you not fpecifie, which were, and which were not ? you have a trick of confounding matter?, you want the Arc of diftinguiming. I will teach it you if you be willing to learn it, and to be informed, as you pretend. Of.Chrifts a&ions and pracHes (ome are exemplary and imitable, which may, and muft be obferved : and others arc inimitable, and inexemplary. I will fitft write of the latter, all his perfpnal works and actions are not exemplary and imitable. 1 . All Chrifts miraculous actions, as his fading 40, dayes and nights in the wildernefle , his giving fight to the blinde, hearing to the deaf, multiplying the Loaves,erv. the which being the A&sand Jllues of his Divine vertue and omnipo- tency > are not exemplary, nor to be attempted of any ; ad- mirable they were, and therefore to be admired of us ; but not imitable, $c therefore not to be obtained. It is true, the Apoftles imitated Chrift herein, and did the like miracu- lous works , or rather did them not out of imitation of Chrift , but as the (pint led them alfo, and guided and en- abled them » for as Aft, 19 .11. God wrought facial miracles by the hands of Paul ; they did not imitate him, nor could , but God rather followed them with his power, & wrought fuch miracles by them; and fo it was but alfo their Perfonal Privi- ledge,and but a Temporary endowment granted them ex- traordinarily, and for that time, at the firft,and for thefafter propagation of the Gofpel. Now, if any Peter will raihly leap into the Sea, to follow Chrift ChriHs author at ivc a ft ions incxemp. andinimiuble. 77 Chrift, who walked there before them > or any Succeffour of Peter (hall come with power, (ignes, wonders and miracles, (under colour of imitating Chrift and (o to be Chrifts Vi- car, or a Vice-God on earth ; he ( I mean , this laft party) is rather an Anti-Chrift, an Oppoler , no follower of Chrift ; his miracles are falfe,and lying wonders (for no man can imi- tate Chrift herein) and (as the firft party brought himfelf in- to danger of finking and drowning) lhall be confumed with the breath of Chrifts mouth ; and Babjlotiy the mother of a- bominations, and fi ch abominable imitations fhall fink, as a ftone caft into the midft of Euphrates. Neither were, nor are thefe. Popifh miracles (though fo called) true, but falfe miracles, both as to their form, being done by the dejuficns of Satan, or the collufions of men : as alfo to their end, being done to ftabliftiiomeerrour. The which God fuftereth to be done, for the trial of his Children , whether they will flick elofe to his word,, as De m .13 , 3 . or for the puniOimcnt of them that believe not the truth, z Thefz.i 1 . \er.i . 54. Sc a very late and famous example, but with all fad and dolorous, we have had of one lames Parnel ,a Chief, and Head-Quaker in £0/- chefier pnfon, who as for one while he would drink nothing but water, fo another while took upon him to faft 40. dayes and nights, in imitation of Chrift. Chrift in patience fuflered him to go on about ten, or eleven dayes, or thereabouts; but after in wrath tent death^through debility of his fto- mack refufing meats to feize upon him, and to put him out of his fits of Quaking, and fury of falling* Let it be (this exam- ple) as a Pillar of Salt, to leafon our fafts, as to favour our meats^and to teach, that every Creature of God is good (Wine and Beer, as we 11 as Water) and nohing to be re- tufed, longer than the ftrengthand life of nature may en- dure: and that none ought in this miraculous manner of Chrifts fafting,prefume to imitate Chrift farther than there may be fome imitable morality in that a&ion of Chrift. Rer member Parnel Jguakerjis remember Lots wife.. sly. Chrift his authoritative actions are not exemplary and imitable,as when he fent his Difcipies for the Colt,with- out leave firft asked of the Owner, Matth, 21.7. The like is not ta be done in imitation of Chrift (though there hath been. 7 8 Chrijls mediatory A&ioMJwxamplary inimitdU. beenfome prefuming this way, of taking Horfe and,Colts, I hope, not in imitation of Chritt) for this practice ot Chrift, was but a proceed of his royall Prerogative and univerlall Dominion he hath over all our goods and creatures. So himfelf faith,?/*/. 501 *. If Inert hungry , [would not tellthet^ or ask of thee. Every beafl oftheforrefi is mint, andthtcatttt ufonaphoufandhilsyVtrtyiot He may lend when hepleafes, for what he pleafeth, whither he pleafeth ; for, The tarth is his, and the fulnejft thereof, Pfal.H.l* He may fend Ptttr to the Sea alfo for the fifli that had in its mouth a piece of fil- ver valued (in the margin) at half a Crown, to pay forcu- ftomand tribute, forlnmlelf and P*r*r, Matth- 17.-27. For,- Thtfea is his9 and he made it, Pfal» or asking them leave ? furely, by the rule of imitation of Chrift, they Cannot; but by virtue of delegation, or deputation of Chrift they may, if they have it; for fothe Ifraelites having the fame, did fpoil and plunder the jEgyp- tians of their money, goods, and jewels* Thirdly, his Mediatory Actions* which he did infatif- faetion to Gods juftice and wrath, and for the redemption of us from fin, hell, and death, are not exemplary and imi- table. True, there hath been much fuffering, and dying, and many martyrdoms and crucifyings of the Saints and Chriftians in the world ; and they have fuftered much, after the example of Chrift, as to the matter, manner, and kinde of death, they bare 'm their bodies the marks of the Lord Jefi*4y Gal, 6. 17. and fill up that wh'ich h behind of the ajfl':5lions of £krifttn their fle{h, Col.i .24. Thus they take up their erodes and follow Chrift. But as to the meafure of forrow, and to the end and purpofe, and to the merit and mediation in his {offerings and death, none were, are, or can be like him -, He Cbritts influential! afiiem inexemp. and inimitable . 79 He is inimitable in this, neither intended thus to be exem- . pi liy. Behold and fee, if there be any forrow li^e unto my forrow, which is done unto^ me. Lament. i . 1 2- himlelf faith ir, who belt kneW if, and Ifai-^3.3- 1 have troden the w'me-preffe a/on; and of the people there was none with me. And fo the Apoftle faith of him, 1 Tim.2.5. There is one Mediatonr hetween god and men,fave the man (fhrifljefpuiwho gave himfelfa ranfomfor all, neither k there falvation tn any other ;for there is none other name under Heaven^ given among men, whereby we mufi be faved, A&S4. I2. If any ihall take upon himfelf to be like unto the Mod High, (as there is one who doth) in granting pardons and indulgences of fin,&: releafing out of Purgatory,(the borders and skirts of Hell) or in letting up Saints, and affimilating them unto (Thrift, in (ome parts and works oi his Mediaror- (hip, his lot will be the like that was Nadafa and Ablhu, for prefuming to imitate the high Prieft, in taking the cenler and offering incenfe, which onely he ^the high Prieft) could and was to do, Levit.io.i,$rc* Fourthly, hbfpiritualland influentiall works and actions, fuchashe, as the Head of his member5, and Governour of , his Church, difpenfeth and dirtributeth alone ; as giving of gifts and vitall powers to every member, the quickening of the word, the gathering his Saints, the fubduing of his ene- mies, Sec. (the which are all hisperfonall Honours3and pre- rogative Dignities, belonging unto him now in Heaven) they are incommunicable unto any, and therefore inimita- ble of all. I will cite buc that one Texr, Ephef.1.20, Sec. God hath raifed Chrififrom the dead,andfet him at his own right hand in heavenly places, far above all principality and power, and every name that is named, and hath put all things under his feet, Rnd gave him to be the Head over all things to the Church, If any ftretch out his foot to follow Chrift herein, or lift up his head, to be like him, (as there is one, who doth) He fhall dafh his foot againft thisftonc, yea, head and all fhall fali down and oft, as the head of Dagon, before this Ark ; whom the Lord fhall confume with the fpirit of his mouth, and de- ft roy with the brightnefte of his coming, even him* who exalteth himfelf to be Head alfo of the Church, and a* J M Gods 8 o chrifts morall virtues apdatlions exmp, and imitable. God, (or as Chrift, who is God) ficteth in the Temple as God, (hewing himfelf that he is God> as to this purpofe it is, zTbejf.2.4, Sec. So then let all tak "heed of drawing fo nigh, or coming up hither unto the Bufli that burnetii and coniumeth not, wherein this great Angel of the Lord fitteth alone, who is (notwithftanding) a confirming fire j labour we not to com- municate of our Lord (Thrift, his incommunicable, nor to imitate his inimitable, nor to [ample our lelves to his inex- emplary properties? works and actions, dignities, wayes, and walkings. Thefe four forts of Chrifts actions, they were perfonall and peculiar to himfelf, not exemplary to, nor imitable of any t they were done by him, and are written of him, for our learning, but not for our imitation (as you joyn them,^ They neither muft, may, nor can be imitated. And therefore confine we our (elves and our imitation of him to fnch of his works and wayes, as may lafely and pro- fitably be followed, and which are intended and propound- ed, and done by him for our imitation and learning both. For thefe before mentioned belong unto his Office?, Re- gall and Sacerdotall, in which we are no where command- ed toim'tate him, for that they are proper and peculiar to Chrifts perfon , and they are adminiftered of him onely in his Propheticall Office > and in fome actions and works thereof he is both exemplary and imitable, by thofe who are lawfully called to the Mimftery of the Church, foits laid, lo\\. 20, 21. As my Tatherfcntme^fo I fend yon* And belides thefe there are of Chrift > actions and pra&i- ccs,which are exemplary for all, &c imitable to people as wel asMinifters, and fo were written of him, and done by him, both for our learning and imitation. And thofe are all his morall actions, and virtues of his life, as his meeknefTe, hu- mility, patience, love, obedience, &c. Thefe onely are they wherein he intended to give an example, and whereof he hath enjoyned us imitation, as well as learning, as Matth. liti 9. Learn ofme^for I am meekjwd / you fhould fo do ,for the fervant is not greater than the Lord,. And fo, now from this example of Chrift (if here it be, what I fay to you, I fay to all, Wafh h as there it was, what I fay to you? I fay to all, watch) you may be not onely a gifted bro* theivbut a Laundering fifter, or your wife rather , when a Wiobw,fpr fo the Apoftles put over this ceremonial Sc in- cidental, pra&ife from themfelves to the Widows of the Church , who afterwards were to wafh the Saints feet,i Tim* 5 . 1 o as like wife they did the ferving of Tables unto Dea- cons before,^, 6.*.. I-aft- Ckrifts fafsive obedience how exemplary, 83 Laftly, take chi> rule from a friend, that Would not you fhould miilead your (elf by examples, no not of Chrift him- (elf, in what he never intended to be exemplary to you- Fol- low Chrift m what he did, and commanded you to do the fame; and fo, in what you have both his precept and ex- ample alio; but not, in what he did, but commanded not, and fo not in what you have onely his example, but no pre- cept alio : For Chrift emptied himlelf this way alfo, and be- came voluntarily poor for our fakes, 1 Cor' 8.9. ate you hence bound to be like him, and to become voluntarily poor for his fake, as the Popifti Hermices hence argue ? No, you muft conceive , that that voluntary poverty in Chrift (as be- fore, his voluntary wafhing of the Apoftles feet) was not in him any aft of his moral obedience, but but it was onely a requisite preparatory aft to the work of redemption > and to the magnifying of his fp '.ritual power, who hi humility and poverty would and could fubdue his enemies, and fave his people, when, as it appeared, there were no external Accef- fibns* nor contributions of temporal gLeatnefTe,or wealth did concurre. The fumme is : The precept of imitating Chrift,is limited to his moral aftions, or commanded example?, but is not to be extended to his circumftantial, or incidental , or indiffe- rent aftion?, or examples generally. For Chrift, as he is the Principal and Fountain of all morall vermes, or vcrtuous aftions, (o he is the Rule and Pattern, and example of them, propofed for all to look uponrand do thereafter. Our imita- tion therefore of him muft be in thoie things , which are univerfal, and belong ordinarily to us,and equally to all the Members of Chrift ; namely his remarkable moral vertues, and his works of ordinary obedience , I fay obedience and vertues. And firft , for his paflive obedience ; wherein though he be not exemplary to us, as I touched before in the ends and purpofes thereof, as he did' it as our Mediatour, yet he is exemplary to us , in the manner and matter, teaching us alfo to differ croffes and afflictions* and that patiently,and there- fore Heb. 12. 1. and 2. Chriftians are bid to run the race of righteoufnejfe, looking unto Jefay&CC. who for the joy that w a fei M 3 before 84 Chrifis acltve obedience jbow exemplary. before him endured the crojfe , and defpifed the Jhame, &v. and verf. 3 . to confider him , who endured fuch contradiction of [tuners again ft himfelf , lea ft ye be wearied and faint in your mindes : The head being got into, and through a ftraight place, is a good example for the Members to follow after, that fo they may fill tip that) which is behinde of the afflictions of Chrift in their flefk for his bodies fakf) which is his Churchy Col. 1 .24, And fecondly? for his active obedience and vermes he Is exemplary to us therein, though not to an equality and full perfection, yet for the quality and fome proportion of them. 60 before fth,i 3 .1 5. I have given jots an example that yefhwld do as I have done, not of wafting the feet of our people , (for that action was but temporary, and according to the cuftom of the placepand age of the world:) but of an humble minde, and tender affection, and companion in Chrift, which graces are not temporary and particular, but moral and univcrfal for all to follow and imitate, as the AyolWe Phil, 2. y&c. Let the fame minde be inyouy which was in Chrift lejtts, wh$ being in the form of God made himfelf of no reputation , tookjipon him the form of a fervanty humbled himfelf , and became obedient unto the wafhing,the wafhing of his fervants feet, as afterwards unto the death , the death of the Croffe, And becaufe I would omit nothing , wherein Chrift is exemplary to us, and imitable of us> or we may be conform- able unto him, I will fliut up this with two Texts of Scrip- ture, I John 3.3, we know that when he {hall appear ,we (hall be like him • whojhall change our vile body, that it may be fajhioned like unto his gloriom body , Phil. 3 . 2 o. Thus in glory ( if in grace we do fample him , and be like to him here) we (hall be fampled and made like unto Chrift, and not onely fam- pled, and made like unto the Angels, Math^^o. Scd. VI. Of the Examples of the J$o(tle$, and their imitation. BUt I come laftly to the Examples of the Affiles : And here I, I ihall tell you, that you ballance together always ChiH the prime and chief Ex ample for immitation, 8 J in your pair of Scales, I mean, your two iheets of Paper, the Examples of Chrift, and the Examples of the Apoftles, and make them alike, or equal Rules and Patterns for our imita- tion : Whereas you mould have weighed them fingly by themfelves, and given the Examples of Chrift the greater weight and worth of the Priority, and Precedence ; yea, praeheminency : For as all the brethrens fheafs did ftand a- bout Iofefhs (heaf,and made obeyfance to it. So all the Apo- ftles Examples, and the Examples of all the Saints that ever were, or Chall be in the Church, rauft vayl, and ftrike fayl to the Example of Chrift , when he is before them they muft do their Homage^ and tbekfamtage unto him, who is the Exam- ple of alt Examples , and himfeif without Example, anointed with the Oyl of gladnefle above his fellows, in whom are hidden all the Treafures ot wildom and graces , to whom the fpirit was given without mcaCure : Whereas the Apo- ftles had the fpirit but in meafure, and out of the Treafures of wifdom and grace were hidden in him , and they are but Examples and Images, according to Chnfts Example; and I pray, who is the Image of God,and the exprefle Character ot nis fubftance, Hd>M3* The Rule is, and is a true one *-> that which is firft,and beft m any kinde, is the Rule and meafure of all the reft; Chrift therefore being thefirftand chiefeft Member in the Church, namely the head, he is to be the ground of conformity to the reft : that as by compaflion Chrift became conformable to his Members in their infirmity, HVf.4.1 5. fo they by Com- munion ought to be conformable unto their head in his fan- Yea, I may call Chrift Jefus the onelj , not onely the prime Example : For whereas man alone , who was eafily to be feen, might not fafely be followed , as not being in-errible in fpirit, and God alone, who might be fecurcly folio wed, could not poflibly be feen, as being invifible in eftencc : Now that God is become man, as onely Chrift is, the GoA-man , behold before our eyes an onely full, and compleat Example and Pattern to imitate. And therefore when the Apoftle S.Paul called upon the Corithians^ {Be ye followers of me) for their imitation of himfeif , he addeth prefently yas Jam of Chnfi Iefttt, . 86 The Jpotf.fecondary, and nest examples for imitation. /*/*#, exprefltng his meaning, that they fhouid follow Chrift Jefus indeed, i Cor. ii, i.and when he had campafTed us withacloudof witnefies, and a croud of Examples, he bids i'S to run with patience the Race of Right eoufneffe^ looking up to U* fm the Anthour and finisher of our Faith) Heb.i 2,1. and 2. But are not then the Apoftles to be look'tunro alfo, as to Examples? Yes, but obferve the diftance and the difference^ of Afpecl, or Refpe£t rather , without which , you tumble together in your (heets , the Examples of Chrift and his Apoftles, (I know not, how many times , but many times, I am fure) not mentioning the leaft difference , or diftinSlion betwixt Chrift and his Apoftles in this matter of Example- fhip &c Imitation ; whereas the great Apoftle himfelf makes Chrift Jefus thefole rule and me a fur e of all other Examples, and propounds himfelf, and all others to be no farther fol- lowed, than they tread in his fteps and walk after him \ and fofrom hence we have this refulr, that we are to imitate the Apoftles themfelvcs,and make them our Examples,but with a chief eye, and refpecl to Ghrift> (eye them alto, but eye Chrift beyond them,efpecially, as the Proto-Patterne) as alfo with this Limitation and Caution fo far as in their praftifes and opinions they refemble, and exprefle.his life and fpint. For Chrift is neceftarily,and abfolutely to b: imitated , as being the way, the truth, and the life, (the way, in his ex- ample and a£tions, the truth in his Do£tnne and promile;; the life, hi his rewards and gifts.) John the Baptift was a burning and fhining light', (and fo were the Apoftles the lights of the world and Church) but Chrift was alfo ^living or enlivening^ quickmnglight?who enlightneth every man coming into the world, proceeding in the, world, and going out of the world ; He the Sun of righteoufnefle (they, but the leiler Stars) in all venues and morals, a very preceptive example, an exemplary precept, a rch,and full vifible Sanctuary, Library, and Commentary of God, whileft he lived upon earth, and much more fitting in Heaven ; This Sun of RightcoufncfTe, (fo I will again {tile him) is without any (pot or fpeck of darknefleor dim- nellc in him, alwayes at the full,{u\lot -the Spirit of truth and holincile, inciring , un-errable, indeficicnr,and no way defe- ctive, jipoftt virtues fir imit:jnprt exemplary for c Ant ion e 87 drive, who neither is deceived in his leading before, nor can deceive any that follow after him. I have faid the more of our Saviour Chrifts example and pattern, to difference him from, and advance hima- bove ail other in that way and kind , becaufe I fee you make little or none betwixt him and his Apoftles in the fame. But now for his Apoftles and Dilciples by themfelves : I acknowledge that the morall practices of the Apoftles, and their moral! virtues alfo are precedents and examples to us,as who therein have traced out unto us the way of eter- nal!, life, and do make very much for our encouragement, and inftitution, and inftru&ion ; who are therefore held out as Beacons of light in the Scriptures unto us. 1. Becaufe naturally we are given to imitation, and gracioufly to the imitation of the beft. 2. Becaufe cnfamples, efpecially it eminent, more move us than words. 3. That we might not be diicouraged with the opinion or apprehenfion or the difficulty of the duty or virtue, feeing we are fampled with men of our own mold,who in the hardeft of them have gone before us. But we muft not pin our obedience, and tie our pra&ices to the example of any Saint, no, nor Apoftle, left we happen to ftumble m the dark, and break our fliins, and in follow- ing of them, we fall with them. For they were men fubjett to the likepaflions that we are; and their light was but as the light of the Moon, mingled with fome j^,fubje£t to wain- ingsy decreafes and eclipfes. The falls and apoftafies, the er- roursand infirmities of diverfeof them, not keeping clofe and holding conpnftion with their Sun of righteoHfneffe^Qhn^ are registered in the Gofpel : as Peters denial of Chritt thrice> and after his confirmation and Chrifts afcenfion, he walked not uprightly according to the truth of the Gofpel, but dift- fembled with the Jews about circumcifion, and therefore 'Paul withfiood him to his face, for he v?A6 to be blamed^ Gai.2. lit Yea, zn&Pdul himfelf? was he not puft up with abidance of revelations? arid therefore a meffenger ofSatwfent%o buffet him, 2Cor.i2.7. I omit the reft, all wh.ch do tell us and teach us, that we muft be wary, and take heed of fetting up of man before us for- our pattern and example. You ( vl N feems) {> 8 Extraord. atfsef Saints^ as Elifha, &c. intxemf. teems ) rufhonandfear nothing? fo you fee the example of an Apoftle before you, or of Apoftles ; For generally you write of their imitation ; but, Sir, were thofe examples I now mentioned, of two the moft famous Apoftles, written for your imitation,as you fay indefinitely >in your firft Qujere? according to your meaning they were \ for your learning they- were indeed, that you mould learn not to diiTemble, not to be pufc up, but for your imitation they were not writ- ten ; for tome of their actions Sc practices noted in Scripture asfinfullj arefoto ir, (pettaclesof humane frailty, not ex- amples of the like pra&ice, and fo were for our caution, not our imitation. Again fccondly,fomepra£t ices an da£rs of the Saints (for I fuppofe you do not confine your imitation oncly to the A- poftles, and Saints of the.new Teftament) the Saints, I fay, TXSt/ibrahapj-i the. Ifraelites, Phmehoi^ Sampfon, and Eliot? are not to be imitated, becaufe they were but perfonall a£ts> that died with them who did them, and who 'did them by afpeciaH direction and difpenfation of God given them, and 10 can inforce or infer no imitation at o^r hands? with- out the like (pecial ties. I mean the examples of Abraham (though the Father of fhe faithful) Haying. (in purpofe) his fon, Gen.2i,i q« Of the ifraelites (the people of God, and &>■ adyifed by him todo) fpcflliug fche ./Egyptians, Exod.y^ 6t Of Phlmhm (zealous for Gods cau(e) . thrufting thorow the two Adulterers in the very act with his javelin* Nnmb^^,y, Of kawpfrn (reckoned amongfl the- Worthies in faith u* of He b . g "a ;)deftroy ing b imieif and .the Ph iiilt 'w9Jttdg . 1 6. % a ,- Of Elias (that man of God), consuming by fire from Hea- ven, the Captains and their Companies* i 'Kmgj. . i o. I belceve there are fome fiery fpiritsabroad, that would* ifthsyrnight be perm'tted, be imitating fome of thefe ex- amples, : especially, the laft of Eliot : as there were fuch, wkneffe J4wes znd jokn,Chri(ls Djfcip]es,/^9«54t Lord, i&y thcy,TV^ ihpHthatwe command ^eiocome'dovon from hea- ycnAnd .cokfumeihem^, m Elias did > Why 1 what's the mat- ter ? The 'Samaritans ywho haye no dealings with the fervs^ as it*S (aid alio, John 4.9*) Would; not receive Chrift and hi> Apo- j&ies.who were Jews. I wifat you before to be of iW.buLl {hall Examples §fSt. Peter anfwerea; gp ihall here dehort you from being of fohn and lames, (enough, you are the name- fake of the one.) Be not rafli and hafty to* call for fire down from Heaven to co lfume u>> in imitation oilobn , or lames, as they would have done in imitation of Eliot, and that becaufe we are not fo ready to receive and in- tertain you ,' and your followers : ftand ft ill and liften , how Chrift himfelf liked of this their zeal of imitating Elms, though in his own behalf ; at thei5 1. UfeyChrifi turned, & re- buked tbem,£rfaid,ye know not what manner offpiritye Are of: as who fliould 1 ay,you muft not think to do as Ellas did, uhlelTe ye were of the (amefpirit rhat Etias !w&s ; you are, or ought tobe,ofagentle,quier,andmercifull fpirit,fuch a one be- comes you, who are Chrifts Dilciples, andf eh a one is moil finable in the Kingdom of Grace.: and fo it follows, the. (on ot man .is not come ( nor bids others go) to deftroy mens lives, but to favc them. You fee, Sir, it is no zeal, but a Cacozeale, or bad zeal to be imitating (indefinitely) the example of Saints , as here of EUas , becaufe you cannot be of£//Vjfpirit,whoby a Divine particular initinct, and power, did-whai he did > and lames and John, they did what they did, led by a fpiric of humane revenge and indignation. You know what manner of fpirit you are, I fee, you are of a hot, and fierce [pirir, in your words and writings here a- gainft us be not fo in yourpiayers,.in calling for fire down from Heaven to confume us ; neither be fo in your Actions, in caftingyoui" wild-fire amongft us,or in tying brands of fire to Fox tayls, and turning them' into our [landing Corn, to turn up our fhockes and (heafes,, as you go about in the fkfl Quaere of your fecond multitude : if you follow in either, the example o£Sampfi*,o\:£lias., you are mifguided, and go not in the right path of imitation of them. * But you will fay, did not Peter jo, the Gofpel,or A£b J.~ deftroy Ananias and Saphira, thole two grand Hypocrites and Sacrilegers, may not. we imitate that example , and do the like aft of the Apoftle ? I anfwer, if you may, look well to y our felvcs, that your own per fous may.be fecured, and fome other Apoftle among you finde you not our, in youi' keeping back a part of what was devoted to the Church : N a bur, 9 o MiyacU dtthns of the Afoflles not Exemplary. but> what, and if God would have an example extant ot his wrath and vengeance againft Hypocrites and* Sacrilegers, at the very firft planting, and founding of his Church under the Gofpel, and by a Divine fpecial power, and lingular a& of Authority j delegated Peter to be inftrumcntal thereunto (to the greater terroos of all Hypocrites and Sacrilegers, ;hen, and after,) may this becaufe the A£t of an Apoltle be drawn into example, and imitation ? Then may that voice alio (poken to Peter, A£ts 1 0,13. Arife Peter, {lay and eaty go for a Precept to do the like. And why may not all the miraculous A&s, and actions, both of tneic,8c the other Apoftles, (who alfo hcai'd the fick, cured the blinde , raifed the dead, &c. Be attempted and imitated ? becaufe (indeed) they were but perfonal privi- ledge?, indulged to them the firft planters of the common faith: and becaufe they were temporary , and fpecial gifts and ads, during, and lafting but thofe primitive times, and fo not all prattiles and enfamples of the Apoftles , were writ- ten for our imitation, Laftly,fomea£tsandpra6tifes of the Apoftles, were buc incidental and occafional , looking , no further then theprefent. 1. Neceflity of the times, thus ^ib 4* 32. they had all things common, neither [aid any »fthem, that ought of the things , which he fojfejfed was his own : you cannot plead here, imitation of the Apoftles!, unleffe you (hew the like neceflity and exigency of times j or unlcfTe you mean to turn Leveller. 2. The appearance and avoidance ot fcandal , (o All. 16.3. Paul circumcised Timotheus, becaufe of the lews>which were in thofe quarters', of fuch Afts and Examples of the Apoftles I fhall {peak more hereafter. To draw up : The Faith, Patience, Meeknefte , Humility and Obedience, and fuch likepra&ifcs of the Apoftles and Saints , are examples for us to imitate '•> yes. , Rules for us to walk by, and follow : Rules, I fay , Iput no perfect Rules , for they did go in and out, and have had windings and turnings, and crooks in their way ; yea,.rather,the word of God , and not the examples ot man, are the ftraight and right Rule, and fane* to wa\kby>Gal.6m 16. No example is to be followed againhSor befides this Rule,for then k is an irregular example} and Prophets bow Exemplary and ImltabU. $ \ and to be avoided. If it be an examples no preceptor Rule for ir, then it is an inobligatory example, and bindes us not to imitation, without there be the like caufes , and the like con- ditions; as how the Apoftles did it, when they did it, where they did it , and why they did it : for where the cafe and caufe is different, there the inftance of an enfample takes noc place, will do no good, to force us to the like, though other- Wife the thing be indifferent. But why , I pray, did you not write alfo, of the examples of Chrifts Prophets alfo to be followed , like as of the Apo- - ftles, whrn as St. lames bids, cap.$,verf.i9. Take, my breth- ren, the Prophets,who have fpoken in the name of the Lord, for an example of fuffering affliction and patience : whether you will take them fo as an example of this, or partake with them in this> in fuffering affliction and patience, I do not de- lire there Qiould be any fuch tryal upon you •* But this I do, and fhall requeft of you, that you would not hereafter ufe learned, and pious perfonage?, and efpecially holy and fa- mous Churches , (whofe faith is fpoken of throughout the whole world,) and the facred Ordinances of the fame, with fuch common and rough language, as you have done , pre- tending for fuch a rudeneffe , and ruggedneffe, the examples of the Prophets in the Old Teftament : For, Sir » their cafe was extraordinary, their calling peculiar, their Commiffion fpecial, their fpirit miraculous, their Authority great ; as to their fingle miflions, they were fent out like Thunder and Lightning, to do that office plainly, for the doing of which in that manner, God had given no Commiffion to any ordi- nary man,or Minifter ; and therefore we never finde that the Prieftsdid ufe that freedom, which the Prophets were com- manded to ufe , whofe very words being put into their mouths, it was not to be efteemed an humane aft , or aiaw- full manner of doing an ordinary office. Neither could it become a Precedent, or example to uy or you, whofe Authority is precarious,and withouc coercion, whofe Spirit is allayed with humility, and other Chriftian graces, whofe words are not prefcribed us, but left to the condud of common prudence, which tells us,that what was fit and pious for a Prophet to do amongft the old Jews ' N 3 would 9 2 six gttAres tfthe Adverf. reciuA •. would be, and is uncivil, and intollerable for an Evangelift to do to the later Chriftians. Lee not the fpirit be more pro- phet ical and legal, than Apoftolical and Evangelical. And thus I have given you my thoughts and anfwers to fourteen of your Quaeres, about the Commands arid Exam- ples of Chr i ft and his A poftles, and that difti'n&ly (though you propound moft confufedly.) The commands; of Chrift by themselves , and the examples of Chrift by themlelves, then the commands of the Apoftles by themfelves , and the examples of the Apoftles by themfelves,and have (hewed un- to you how far forcb,each of them,and all of them are for our learning and imitation. But to what purpofe is all this waft, of Paper, and Ink,and it may be, Oyl ,or Tallow ? (for I gheiTe your Quires have more of the dark nighr,than the light day in them?) In wiiac particulars, at laft, will thde generals end, about the com- mands &: examples of Chrift & his Apoftl. being for our lear- ning and imitation? why ? fure, in tbefe iix points as it feems, which are your demands, and immediately follow after the fiift (even Qim'es. I muft let them down in your own Words again, before I (hall anfwer unto them. Iwoulddefire toknow of you can give from the words of Chrift for the fe your prattifes, whofe Mmifters you pretend to be, i. For forcing maintenance from thofe that are not willing to fay ity it going againji their confciencet and fuing them at the Law to recover them, 1, For jour owning of the Mini ftry of the G off el of (fhri ft, upon an account of your humane Learnings Arts >and fey nee s, and other acquired farts from Oxford, or Cambridge , or fuch like Schools of humane learning, 5, What Warrant you have from the words of Chrift , for your baptifing of Infant sy before they ho actually believe, 4. What Warrant you have from the words of fhrifty for admit- ting ofperfons to the Lords Supper, before they are baptifed^ac cord- ing to thrifts in ft i tut ion, and holding forth the works ofholineffe to- wards God, and right ecu fneffe towards men \ in a word, before they are born of water, and the fpirit, or at lea ft fo far as man can judge them fo to be, 5. What Warrant you httve from the word of God> to own your fslva 1 be fame gutres examined. • $ 3 felves Taftours of Churches ^whileft yon perform not thofe duties^ which are enjoy ned to all P aft stirs of (fhurches by Chris! and the 9s4pojrUsof£hrift,in Math. 10.8. A What word we have fork ; It feems thereby, this is that, our maintenance you primarily and principally intended to fubftra£t ;and our Miniftery, but fecondariiy, 3c in the next placc,as if you would firft ftarve our bellies,from filling them- fclves, and then ftop our mouths from preaching to others. Sec5t VI I. Of the Miniftery of the Church of England. BUt contrary to your order, or diforder rather, I (hall be- gin with your fecond Quaere firft, and give you a reply to that, which is about our Miniftery. And to this, a brief anfwer might ierve turn, that neither I, nor any of my brethren, d» own our Mtm 'fiery upon the Ac- count of humane learning y Arts and Science sy or other acquired parts received from Cambridge or Oxford, For feeing you Were of neither, why fliould you, writing to a Cambridge man, put Oxford firft ? You lhall give me leave to order you bet- ter in this, as in diverfe other J have, and to put Cambridge firft, and Oxford next. This is but a falfe account of your own drawing up ; we own our Miniftery upon a better ac- count, the beft of all. 1. Upon the account of an inward call from God* a. From the account of an outward call from men of the Church. And becaule I fee by your fpeaking fo particularly to my felf, that youfeekjt proof 'of C^rtfisfi eakingmmey as the Apoif le faith the Corinthians did> in him, * C*nr 5.3 . I will give you a proof of it,I mean of my inward call from drift; I muft do k,for no body elfe can ; what man knoweth the things of a man, fave the fpiritof a man which is in him, 1 Cor. 2. 1 1. If any man elfe could, I would be filent,and obferve Solomons rule, Prov.i7.a, Let another man praifc thte, andnot thine own O mouth,, 96 Inward and outward calling of Ministers. month. Seeing then, to {top the mouth of a gan-fayer, I muft open my mouth this way ; know, Sir , that having {pent Come years in the (earching of the Scriptures, and ftudy of theDiviuc Learning, Art, and Science, and having got- ten thereby the knowledge of Jefu> and Salvation by him, I found in it men admirable latisfadion, and fuch fweet comforts, that (with the four Leper, 2 K/^.7,9.) {thought I (hould not do well, if I did not go and publifti it, and tell others of the plenty I had found : and often thinking upon the fpeeehes of Ch ft to Peter, Teter, when thou, unconverted, ftrengthtn thy brethren; Luke 22. 32. and, Petery lovejl thou me ? feedmyjb:ep : Joh. "21. 1 5. Itook up (ome thoughts of entering into the Miniftery of the Word. So then I fell to common placing and probleming (as it is called in the Col- ledge) and I made.it a very preaching &c difputing of Divi- nity heads, which I did very frequently, never milling mine own turn, and often ifupplying others j and finding thereby, that the grace of Chrift gave me Come meamre of compe- tent eloquution," memory, boldnefle and zeal, I retolved to be a Minifter, and I may adde, I had no reft in my fpirit, untill I was {uch, I {peak the truth in Chrift , I lie not. This is the account I can give of my inward call ; (and fo,I doubt not, but that others can give the like ; of which, though you* make but fmall account, I conclude it, and lubmit it to better' judgements than yours and mine, faying as the Apoftle, Thefpirits of the Prophets arefnb]ett to the Prophets^ 1 Corinth, 14" 32- . . . So fecondly, I own my Minijtery upon the account of aiv outward call ; For, beudes my Patents dengnation of me to the Miniftery, and many private friends encouraging me thereunto, and mine own inclination, and education, and ftudies accordingly and purpofely, the Colledge where I was Fellow, by virtue of a Statute, called upon me, as ano- ther of the Fdlows at the fame time; and. follicited us, and even urged us to take the Miniftery of the Word upon us, and to that purpofe,. gaye us under the Colledge Seal, their Letters teftimoniall and commendatory, unto a pious and learned Bilhop, to be ordained Minifters of the Word : and fo thither we went* I will Inward and outward calling of Minifters. 9 7 I willgratifie you fofaralfo, as to give you account of the manner of our being ordained, (uppofwg you are very ignorant thereof, or eKe you would never make fo flight ac- count of the Miniftcrsof the Church of England as you do. There were formerly in our dayes, and anciently in the dayes of old, fet and folemn dayes, appointed onely for this purpofe of ordaining Priefts, and making Minifters ; (they are both terms alike with us, and I adde the one, that you ■ihoiild not take offence at the other.) Then we went, and met diverfe Divine?, who came from other places to the fame purpofe, exhibited pur Letters teftimoniall,and offered our felves to triail. After fome prayers, and readingof the twentieth of the ■Aftsy from the fcventeenth to the twenty ninth verfe ; and the tenth oijohn> from the firft to the feventeenth verfe, and a Sermon (purpofely for the bufineile in hand.) The Arch- Deacon, having before examined us in private, and feen our publike Teftimonies, prefented.us all to the Bifhop, to be admitted Priefts or Minifters : The Bifhop queftioning our fitnefle, Sec, hewasfatisfied therein by the Arch-Deacon ; then the Bifhop turning to the people prefentr bade them declare in the name of God, if they knew any crime or im- pediment in us : and they alledging nothing, there were made particular prayers by the Bifhop and the whole Con- gregation on our behalf, for the bleffings of God and his Spi- rit upon us. Then the Bifhop made a large Exhortation to us, of the dignity, difficulty, and duty of Minifters, ftiriingus up to diligence andfaithfulnefle ; and after fome queftions pro- pounded to ns, and our anfwers given, (too large to fet down here) the Bifhop prayed again, and invited the Congrega- tion to do the fame fecretly in their fupplications, during which there was a certain f pace kept infileijce- the Bifhop prayed again, and then He, with the Priefts and Minifters there prefenr, laid their hands feverally on every one of us, kneeling upon our knees, He faying thofe words, %ecetve the holy Ghoft, whofe fins ye remlty they are remitted \ and whofe fins ye retain , they are retained^ Joh,2 o»2 3 , Be thou a faith- full Difpenier 01 the Word of God and of his holy Sacra- O2 ments. 98 Inward And onward calling of Minifters. ments, In the name of the Father, the Son, and die noiy Ghpft, Amen. Then the Bifliop delivered toevery one of us, die Bible in his hand, faying. Take thou authority to preach the Word, and to minifter the holy Sacraments in the Congregation, where thou (halt be fo appointed. This done, we received the Communion, andfo were difmifled with a prayer to God > for a blcfling upon us and our Miai- ftery. Yon fee Sir,and ycu are beholding tome , who have ta- ken the pains to let you lee , (if yet you will) that neither I, nor other Minifters of the Church of England , do hold our Miniftcry upon the account of the Univerfity humane Arts and Science^ but upon che account of Chrifts fpirit, ftirring and inclining us thereto, and his Church its Authority gi- ving us by the Officers thereof? both Million and Commif- iion to officiate therein, and that not in a rafh,fudden, and tumultuary way, but difcreetly and ad vifedly, taking a full tryal of , and receiving good Teftimony for our fitnefle and abilkies;yea,rcligioully and devoutcly calling upon God for his fpirit and graces to be imparted to us , and propounding to us effectual exhortations out of the word , folcmnely ad- monifhing us of our duty. So that,.as the Apoftle faith, eve- ry other Creature, or Ordinance of God isgoodrthat is fanfti- fied by the word of God, and prayer, I Tim# 4. 4. 5. (o We que- ftion not (whatsoever you quaere) and we reckon, (whatio- ever you account) that our Ordination and Creation of Mi- nifters, and our Order and Creature, our Miniftcry is good, and of God, having been thus fan&ified unto us, as I have fhewed by the word of God and prayer of the Officers of the Ghurch,out felves,and the Congregation prcfent. And fo I add the words of St- Patd, 1 Cor.4 *. Let a man ,. (every man, and you alfo, if fnch)/i account ofusyos the Minifters of £hrift, and Stewards of the myfteries of Gad. And as to your particular fling at me and my Miniftcry, I fay , again ythat the fpirit of the Prophets^is fubjett unto the *Prophetst of which you arc none with St. Paulyin the third verj. of the fame Chapter, with me it is a very fmall thing that I fiould be judged of you, or of mans judgment, fucll a mans judge- ment a,s yo\\l%\) ea^ljudg not mine own felf'-^wi Iconfes,/^ not worthy Humane learn, and L ang. needfulifor the Mini fiery , '" 9 9 worthy tofioop down , and unloofe the hatchet of my Lord and Matters fhoes , Mark^\, 7. much ieffe to have my feet flood w'th the preparation of the Gofpel of peace, Ephcf. <5. 1 5, or that the iglorious Gofpel of Chrift ihould be committed to my truft h For, who isfujfcient for thefe things ? 2 Cor.2,1 <5. But / thank^ Chrift jefus «ur Lord , who h at h enabled me , for that he counted me faithfully putting me into the Mimftery oiiao. Gofpel, iTim.1.12,, whereof I tv as made a Minifter, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me, by the effectual working of his power unto me,who amleffe than the leaf}; of all Saint s,not wor- thy to be called a Minifter, or meffenger of Chrift ; Is this grace given, that I (hould preach, unto his people , the unfearch* able riches of Chrift, Eph. 3.7*8. And now f to proceed with yon) who ever , befides your felf, was (o bold and impudent to fay, or forge, that we own our Miniftery upon the accunt of humane Learning , Arts, and Sciences, Sc fuch like parts acquired in the Univerfities? it istrne,we doftudy for certain years , Logick, Rhetorick, Philofophy ,Mctaphyftck , thofe Liberal Arts and Sciences; and alio the Greek and Hebrew tongues , which are more than humane; as in which Languages , the Divine myfterics of God and godlincfTe were Originally written : But it is to this end, not that we might afterwards own a Miniftery up- on an account of thefe,as you fondly and amply imagine : but that thefe Arts and Sciences might the more fortifie our reafon,(urnifh,our undcrftanding,ftrengthen our judgment, when we come to difcouife with natural, reafonable, and un- reasonable men , and of natural and rational, things (many whereof are mentioned inScript.Sc we are like to meet with- all in the world,) & efpecially,when we come to argue from the Scripturec, or to interpret them, that the knowledge of. the tongues, the Divine tongues and Languages, now rather than humane , might the better enlighten and guide us. And fo, though thefe are not of that account with us , as to make a Minifter (P have the wed you before, what makes a Minifter) yet they make a man more able and fir,to be made a Minifter; yea ,and more fir, to perform the work and place of a Minifter. Though indeed Jelus Chrift,the ableft of Minifters, and the High-Prieft and Apoftle of our profef- O 3, fioa. i o o Chrifi hah humane learning andfcienecs , Uon needed none ofthefe our humane Arts and Sciences, and other acquired parts of ftudy and indu[lry,as,who came to reveal the wtfdomof his father, and the Myfteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, in order to our Salvation (which is onely by Divine grace)yet for that the Scriptures fay of him, Col. 2. 3. that in him were hidden all the 1'rea fares of wifdom and knowledge, fo that he is omnifcient, I dare not but add into that full account,even the Treafures of all humane wifdom, Arts, Sciences, and Languages, good and Lawfull. Elfe I fhould make himlefler in fome manner of wifdom and ho- nour than Solomon and Mofes, whereas Heb, 3. 3. Chrift is counted worthy of more honour than Mofes, who was learn- ed in all the knowledge of the i/Egyfti*ns,h&* 7. 22.se in the 1 2th. Math. 41. Chrift beareth wicneffe of himfelf and his witnefie is true-he was greater than Solomon, in all manner of wifdom ; Solomons wifdom being but a figure, and a type of his. Yea, and doth not St. Luke fay, 2.51. that he went ho/tte with his Parents, and became fub\e tt unta.them, (in learning and pra&ifing their humane Art and Science,) and that he in- created in wifdom, wifdom acquired, "and increafable by ex- perience and observation , (which, what is it, but humane Science, and acquired Art?) of which he gave us Evidence and Teftimony, in thole many, and manifold Parables, fa- vouring of his humane learning and Science in natural Phi- lofophy,and other Arts; as, who cited alfo a verfe out of a Poet, and made ufe of it, at the Converfion of Satd9 as anon you fnall hear. Andlaftly, as he honoured marriage by his prefence thereat, and eating and drinking With them at that Feaft, where he alfo turned water into Wine, (his firft miracle,) John 2.1 o. So he countenanced the humane learning of the great and learned Doctors and Rabbies, by his fitting in the midft of them, and his oft converting and difcourfing with them , the Pharifees, Sadduces, Scribes, and the reft of the learned of that, age : All which together may teach us there is a good, and holy ufe to be made, even ol humane learning and Science in a Chriftian Church : and fuch water of the Heathens may be turned into Wine for Chriftians. For the Apoftles,it is true alio, they needed not any ac- quired Some Apoft. {St.Paulefptc.) bad humane learning. 1 @ 1 quired humane learning, to be gotten by ftudy, or induftry, or to have been educated, and nolirtured up in any, who were fo immediately enlighmed, and extraordinarily , even mira- .culoufly infpired and gifted by Chrift and his Spirit, upon all occaiions &; emergencies to carry on their woik, the preach- ing of the Gofpel to all Nations ; 10 they needed not itudy> think, or meditate aforehand,what they Ihould (ay,or (peak, for that it was given them in that very, and every hour : they needed not to plough, or (owe; as, who had plentifull ftores, and a Granary of the fpirit of Chrift within them : Yet, I queftion not,but they acquired parts of humane wifdom alio, and Science, which they learned by their dayly conventi- on with Chrift, Travayles,and experience abroad, and they made good ufe of it. So that though directed by one and the fame fpirit, dictating to them the fame matter infallibly, and infpiring them with their infufed parts immediately : Yet they make different exprefflons of the fame, as to the manner of their ftile and phrafe , argumentation , and elo- qu;ncerwhich comes(partly)fronuhe variety,and difference of their natural,and (partly) from the variety and difference of their acquired hume learning and Science. St. Luke, one of thefpirits Pen-men and Writers of the Gofpel? was a humane Learned Artilt in Phyfick,mentioned and called, by St. Fwl, Col.4.1 4. Luke the beloved Phfjtci^ny \ and 2Tiw«4..n^k^-h;is Companion and Ailociat : Apollo s Tfrai an eloquent nfantlAd[, 1 8. 24, andmighty in our Scriptures,. But St. Paul, e£pecially.,was brought up at the feet of Gama- liel', and knew morenhtiiidxey all j' the otjier Apoftles , more of humane learning /alfoiPoetr-y and Phdofophyjand fpake. more Languages thaktheyuil* s&lled^a thejGreek as well as. the Hebrew LanguagevWas enabled thereby, to be the more profound Preacher, acureiDifputer? SC a more choice VefTel, to bear the name of Chrift to Jews , Gentiles, Barbarians*, Scythians , Philofopfcers , Stoikes , Epicures yand all forts of Artifts and people, and to bear it up againft them all : as youf may fee in the 17th. of Alls , efpecially •z/fr/. 28. where he quotes againft the Athenian Atheifts and Idolatersjc&li a verfe out of one of their own Greek Poets , (whofe name is Aratus) in bimwe.hvff^andmove^ and have our being }las certain alfo of, your io2 Seme Afoftt (ShPaul efttc.) bad humane learnivg. your own Poets have [aid , « }«? ^ >*v©" «^v. i.e. /«r we are aU [o his offering : and lea ft you lhould think, that dropt from St. Paul unawares; He citech another, a whole Jambick verfe, out of another Greek Poet, in dif courfe with the Corin- thian Church about the Refurre&ion, i CV.i $.33. which is this

«fK(TiJ' fit XP"7^' optxia.t k&w : i,e. Evil communica- tions corrupt good manners : and the Greek Poets name was cAleftander. And again, St. Paul writing to Titus in Crete* and hearing there were many vain talkers and deceivers,and telling him their mouths.mufi: be (topped , he faith thus ac the 1 ^. verfe, one of themfelves, a Prophet ot their own,faid : (He means by Prophet, a Poet of their own, and he means, by name, Epimenides, who was a Proet of Crete, out oi whom he quotes a whole Heroical verfe.) K?»m* *'" 4.1? $***> ***« %i$ay*si&s d?ya.i> i.e. the- Cretians arealwajes lyars, evd beaftsy [low bellies, Calimachm alfo, and Cyrenew, otljer two Greek Poets have the firft half of that verfe , and ghre ano? thcr rcafon, why the Cretians are filled lyars alwayes-,which< I will not transcribe here, becaufelwili not trouble your eyes and brain, with more of humane Arcs and Language, than I findc in the Scripture. I could tell you more , how St. Paul took, and borrowed out of 37**0* the Philosopher thofe terms of the ™ lu» )&*$nM , £ ou txrh aNfttrapn tViough he applied them to another fenfc, and divers. For this we finde in Hiftory ^ th^c the Citie of Tarfas did cxcell even A~ thens-Mxi Alexandriay'm theftudyoi Phiiofcphy, and other Arts and Sciences ; of which Citie, Paul was a Citizen ot no mean Citie, as himfeif faith, Aft, 2 x.i may add a Student of otthe famous Univerficy there, and fo iftere Paul had the opportunity of reading , and feeing the books, both of the Philofophers and Gireek Poets> and fo long after, at the wri- ting of his Epiftles made ufe of them, as it is apparent he did. And there are that fay, that thofe words were ufed by our Saviour Chrift y in Aft.$, %. to. Saul: (forfo then he was named}/* ishafdfor thee to kick^againfi theprkkjx e^x^ov out of any of our humane Authors and Arts to affright you : but where the Scripture, and the Apoftles have made mention ofanyfuch»you muft give me leave to tell you of them, that fo you may learn to make better account ofjiumane Arts and Authors than (I fee) you do. But yet I muft add that , now being inserted and in-rolled in the Divine Scriptures by the holy fpirit, they are no longer humane layings and verfes, but Divine dictates, and parts of the facred Word of God j euen as the Gold of Ophir , being brought into the Temple of Solomon, was fanctified thereby, and became holy and ian&ified. Yea, which of all our humane Arts and Sciences there, that is not approved of God , and needfull for a -Minifter e whileft they are in fubjecl:ion,and (erviceable as Hagar was to Sarah, they may be within the fame houie and ftudy , but if they be too faucyiinfolent,and rebellious, and take too much upon them in the Myfteries of Divinity , as Hagar did towards her MiftrilTe^^, then they muft be (hut que of doors, and fent packing away. And in this it is, that the Apoftle , (who himfelf had caft down imaginations and reafonings (againft faith and grace) and every thing (or fpeculation) that exalted it felf againft the knowledge of God , and brought into Captivity every thought to the obedience of Chnft) bids us beware, leafi any fpoil w through Phthfophy, and vain deceit after the Tradition of men, and Rudiments of the world, and not after Chrifi^ Col.2.8^ andfo 1 Tim. 6. 20. keep that which is committed to thytruft, avoiding prophane, and vain b ablings, and oppositions offcienccfalf* lyf the profeffion whereof cau- feth to ene from the faith, that the Apoftle bids you beware P oU 1 04 Mofesand Solomon had humane learning andfcumts. of, and avoid ; it is as if a warning were given,as it is Rom.i 6, 17 . market hem which caufe divifions and offences contrary to the 'Dotlrinei which ye have learned and avoid them, ox. turn away from fuch falfe Teacher s , who having but a form of godlinejfe , creep into houfes , and lead cay the filly women, &;c. 2 Tim. 3. all Teachers are not inch though there be fume fuch,you know; nor is all Philofophy fuch l'poyling and deceiving, there is iorae fuch.I know, there is a true, enriching, enabling Philo- phy, and there are fciences truely fo called , ( which is bun the knowledge of God in the Creature? , Rom. \, 20.) and thefe, whileft they are fubjecled to the Divine truth,and lub- fervient unto the word, may be ufual to a Divine, and bene* ficial to a Minifter of the wordf OHofes, as I hinted before, was learned in all the know- ledge oiihe Egyptians y. and notwithftanding a very meek man, what an approved and faichfull Minifter was he of the Law, and in the houfe of God I Solomon, a wife- man, and a grear Phijofopher, who fprfke 3 000 proverb s,and hps Songs were 1 o© 5. And hefpake of Trees from the Cedar~Tree , that is in Le« banon , even unto the Hyfope that fpringeth out of the wall , he (pake alfo of beafls andfowle , and of creeping things, andfijhes, 2 Kings 4.3 2, ^3. and thefe did not hinder the words or the Preacher, the Son ot Davidi Kingoijentfilem • yea , for all this^andthe rather for this, Solomon was by an excellency called EccLfiafles, or the Preacher. Who can read and underftand the laft Chapters of Job, without a good mea ure of knowledge in Aftronomy , and Philofophy, and other of the Arts ? is there not need of Lo- gick to divide the word of God aright , which is a fpecial Office of a Minifter ? and fo of Rhetorick, to perfwade the hearers , and of School Theology to convince the Gain- fayers , and of Hiftory to underftand theCuftomes and Laws of the Nations , and efpecially the Hebrews and Romansyto which fometimes the Apoftles allude, and alfo of the Languages, elpeciaily ol Greek^znd Hebrew , wherein the Apoftles preached , and wrote their Gofpcls and their E- piftles. Though you make but little regard and account of our Univerfity learned, and liberal Arts and Sciences, yet when I read Our MiniHry bath for it the Command $f Chrift. 105 I read many paiTages of Scripture, and eCpecially the Para- bles of Chrift, as the Cower and the feed , and break up the fallow ground of your hearts, (that the trial of your faith might be as of Gold in the fire) and the Kingdom of Heaven is like unto a Merchant- man? &c. infinite more fentences of like matters , I with I had fomc, or more of your Countrey illiterate, and illiberal Arts , and Sciences , of plowing and (owingi&c. as alfo of the Cittie Gold-{jpith and Merchants, I lhould make good Life of it in expounding, and preaching upon fuch Texts. Yea, the minifterial calling may require an univerfal confluence ,and the whole Cyclopedic of Arc?, and Sciences, both of Univerfcy, and Countrey, and Cittie to make up a compleat Minifter , a workman that need not to be ajhamed, 2 Tim.2.1 5. for coming to a place of Scripture, and not knowing what to Cay to it, or of it, as he lhould, and the Latitude, and profundity thereof requireth ; for want of Art and skill in thefe things, whereof chey treat. Bui I will come to your own Terms ^ we, the Minifters of the Church of England do own our miniitery upon the ac- count of the Commands of Chrift and his Apoftles, and the examples of them both. I. The Command of Chrift is in Math.1%, 19,20. Go ye therefore , and teach alt Nations, baptiz,in as, who finiGied their lives in the world,fome few years after, and therefore it was, is, and will be fulfilled in their fucceffours, their odinary miniftry ,or going forth to teach and baptize, and fo by this Commandment and promife , Chrift hath fecured a con- Pa fta io 6 We have for it the Example efCkrifi.fromife^and donation. ftant order and courfe of Minifters to be Cent, and to fucceed the Apoftles unto the worlds end. 2. The example of ChrinVJo/wao. a1- A* i*j father hath fent me , even fo [end Ijott, and when he had [aid this^ he breathed on them, fay ingy receive ye the Holy Ghofi. The Apoftles then,- and their Succeffour, the Minifters of the Gofpel , they are Priefts after the order of Chrift lent of him, and Chrift is tent of God his fathe, a Prieft for ever after the order of Mel- chifedek, Hebj.6. fo thofe (hall) and muft continue, and be upheld in their Succeflions throughout all ages, by venue, and upon the account of Chrifts eternal Prieft-hood , who alfo breaths upon them, and gifts them for the work , as ap- peareth Ephef 4. 8. when he afcendedup en high , he gave gfcs nnto men , andverfe U. he gave fome Apoftles fome Evange- lifts , and fome Pa flours and Teachers , for the perfecting of the Saint j, for the work^ef the Miniftry ^andfor the edifying of the bo- dy ofChriJty till we all come in the Zfnity of the Faith* &c. unto a perfect man^Scc. and that uy untilltheend of the world* Shew me now, if you can,fuch a command from Chrift, , fuch an example of Chrift, with fuch a promife, and fuch a Donation, for a fucccflion to hold till the end of the world,, for your onely gifted Miniftry taken upon you without any Miflion as above, 3. We own our Miniftry upon the accouifcof the Com- mand of the Apoftle?, 1 Peter, in the name of the reft,/*#J 1 . 1 2 . There mutt be one ordained to be a witnejfe with us of the re- furreclierty 2. S. Paul, by name, 1 Tim. 5 .*2 . lay hands fnddcn- Ij on no man^ Tit. l» 5 , / have appointed thee to ordain Elders in every Ch'te. The manner (fuddenly) being forbidden ,the matter, (that of laying rn of hands) being put for the Admiffioninto the Miniftry a commanded there to Timothy ,upon whom the A- poftle had laid hands , giving him a deriveable power and Authority to do the fame, and commanding him to do it,, and f o to take order for a continual fucceflion of Minifters ; yea, he charged him the fight of God p hat hefhonldkeep this Com- mandment without fpot-} mrebukeablcy (namely the Words and inftitutions of Chrift, as alf o the particular directions he had given him about the cryals, choice, and abilities of Mini- fters); We have alfo for it the Com. and the Exampl. of the ApofiL 107 fters) untill the appearing of our Lord Ieftts thrift , l Tim. 6. 1 3. *4. 4. Upon the account of the Examples of the Apoftles : For fo they, after they had ordained Mattbiatyznd the (even Deacons , distributed themfelves into all Nations and Coun- treys ;and as they w?nt, they laid hands on certain per(ons (fit for the work) and lent them away, and ordajned them Elders in every Church, and deputed others, (as Ttootkj be- fore) Thu4y whom St. Paul left in Crete » for this very caufe, that he mould fet in order the things that are wanting, and ordain Elders in every Cittie > and fo take care of propaga- ting the Gofpel by a fucceflion of Elders and Presbyter^thus Afts 13.3.14,^3.^^1, 5. Now (hew me the Commands of the Apoftles for it, and their Examples in doing it themfelves, and taking fuch ftri£t care with others, that gifted men onely , (of which fort there were in thofe dayes far beyond thefe times, as I have (hewed before) upon whom they laid no hands ? and whom they ne- ver ordained , (hould carry on the preaching of the Gofpel, and the work of the Miniftry unto the end of the world, and Ohrifts (econd coming. But the afore mentioned Commands of Chrift , and their Examples arc (till going on in their full courfe, and carried on in the Churches of Chrift (and in ours alfo) by theSuccef- f ours of the Apoftles, and their Succeflburs, that is,Minifters ordaining, and ordained, and fo (hall in all ages,unto Chrifts fecond coming ; and you cannot deny us , to have the fame Commands and Examples derived, and devolved to us > and the fruit, benefit, and effect of them, who by vertue of the fame power and Authority given in, and by them, and carried all along the fucceeding age>:, and alfo after Hie due form and manner ufed , and prefcribed by the A^utles in thofe primitive times, have been ordained,admictedjand fent out into the miniftery of Chrift and hisGolpel. I know there is a trite , and thredbare exception to this line of our fucceffton , and right of our ordination , that we the Minifters of the Church of England, were made (uch by Popifh and Antichriftian Bifhops : what if fome of the firft Reformers of our Religion were fo ? (though I think they P % were 1 08 Ob)e&ien invxlid of Pep'tfh Bifh ordain. w Minifltrs. were rather extraordinarily railed, than ordinarily called as I have laid) their ordination Was good, and valid, and they might, and ought to discharge the function rightly and law- fully ; The minifterial Ads ot Ittdas the Apoftle and 'Hjcko- las the Deacon were never accounted void? or null. If indeed the Church of Rome had been then wholly cor- rupt and i^ntichnftian, as touching the very and total eilen- tiais, the»indccd it could not have ordained ChriftianMi'ni- fters, no more than a dead man can create, or beget a living Child : But ivch it was not then, (nor is yet,) as which hold- eth one God •> three perlons , the two natures in Chrift, and (ome Other points fundamental^ and therefore may tru- ly Ovdain, and impofc handMn the name of the Fattier, Sou, and holyGhoft. She is not now indeed (nor was then) a true and chafte Spoufe oi Chrift, for that the hath forfaken the guide ot her youth , and hath left her firft Love, ((he had when Paul the Apoftle had the fx^ft care of her) and hath embraced the bolom of ftrangersjftnce her other Pauls have had the overfight,or EpiLcopacy,or rather Papacy there.But yet lhe is not a caft oft whoremou hath received from Chrift, the Churches Bridegroom and Husband,her bill of divorce- ment in fad and deed, as of right and merit is due, for that (he retaineth tome part of a covenanted wife , Sc keeps fome pieces of the. Matrimonial contract. Howfoever , for thefe hundred years & upwards, untillof very late, we, the Mmi- fters oiEngUnA have had an uninterrupted Ordination from Chriftianand Godly learned Protcftant English Bilhops,and therefore now let all iniquity flop her mouth , and abfolete calumnies vanilh out of fight, as to us and our times. And fo now Sir, you will (i hop :) own us as Minifters up- on your own account, which I have therefore drawn up for your better fatisfa£tion,fo alfo upon the whole account that I have now given unto you. But yet if for all this that I have faid,you will not; (as there are a fort of people that love darknetle more than light, fo that the more light is let in- upon them, the fafter they fhut their eyes) our comfort is, all Chriftian Reform d Churches in the world do own us to be true Min liters (and not found Members onely) of the Church of Chnlr,whercasitwillbea , work Gifted breth. pretended Min.net from their extraord.gifts^&c. ioJ~^ Work too hard, 3c difficult for you, to get any Teftimony,or approbation for your(gifted only )Miniftry(ii yet you have (o much from any of the Protectant Churches , ancient, or mo- dern, as, who very well know, it is but a Gourd, or Mufhrom ofyefterdayesrifing, and growing ; a new upftarc order 5 a bold brat begotten and born in an uproar and tumult in Ger- many ; a very humane tradition; a very will-mini ftry : is Saul a/fi among the Prophets i But who is its father?fathcr Muncer^ or father Kmpper doling , or father John ot Ley den , and let Johnoi Waltham take heed of being Son , or Heir to the one, or other. And laftly, Sir, let me fpeak this in your ear, that no body elfe may hear it , and believe ir. If you have renounced your baptifme conferred upon you by an ordained Minilter , and have been new dipt by fome ofche#water-men,and have been re-baptifed Iohny by I know not what, /*/>» th ' BaptihS you have broke loofe from the lweet yoake of Cbritt , flipt out of the door of the Universal Church vifible, and are fofar horn being a Minifter, as you will fcarce hold (in the opinion and account of the belt and wifeft ) to be a Member of the fame. Come therefore and return to your firft baptifme, for then was it better with you than noWj you fee 1 am ft ill ready to counfel you for the better. And now, Sir, I fhall be as bold with you, as you have been with me, and fhall put you to the queftion, and it may be to the wrack, Upon what account do you hold your Mi- niftery > for do you not pretend to it, by your preachings in High-Eafter and Mafhbury Churches ? By what authority do yotitheie things,and who gave you this authority ? what, is it upon the account of your extraordinary fpirituall gifts and abilities ? what they are- in your preaching I know nor, but in your writing they are not fo much as ordinary ; yea, extraordinary weak and imperfect for the true letters, fcnfej and reafon : and they amount but to fome knowledge,good memory, great boldnefTe, and high zeal^ at the molt and bcft« But how came you toyourcxtracrdinary gifts ? were they acquired, or infpired ? If acqir red, then itmuft be in the ufe of means, ftudy and'induftry in the Countrey, and what's the difference then twixt yours and our acquired "parts » 1 1 o Nor from their or&w*ry gifts as acquired. parts in the Univerfity* tor you not onely inartificiaUy, but undivinely fay, From the Univerfity, whereas every good gift is from above, as the ApoftLe faith* But there needs rio more words of this, foryoudifclaim and renounce all humane learning, Arts and Sciences, and other acquired parts, received from Schools or Univerfi- tiec, and will have nothing to do with them, and it is plain you have nothing to do with them ; for you neither reafon out of Logick, nor perl wade out of Rhetorick, nor difcourfe out of Phiiofophy, nor number right out of Arithmctick,nor write true cut of Orthography , nor interpret Scripture out of Theology,nor do any thing artificially out of Art, or fcien- tifically out of Science, only you can rail to purpofe Without any Art or Sciences ; yea, againft all Arts and Sciences, a- gainft Church and Minifters. Take heed you do not learn, the Art to rail againft the^Word or Scripture. If infpired , and that immediately, then fhew us fome word, for thefe immediately infpired gifts, finccthe Apo- ftles times. As for Joel^.i 8. I will pour out my Spirit stponaU flefa (fo indeed you are withh the compaiTe, being fome of all flcfh) 29. and, Vpon the fervants and handmaid's in thofe dayes will I pour out of my Spirit, ((o, you are without the compaiTe, being none of thofe dayes.) The margin tels you, pointing to^Usi. 17. when were thofe dayes there lpoken of, and this Propheiie fulfilled; when the holy Spirit, and thofe extraordinary (pirituall gifts were poured out up- on the Apottles and others, at the firft publication of the Gofpel : and fo the true and full meaning of that Text is, that ail, both Minifters and people, under the Gofpel, fhall be more abundantly enlightened and enriched with the gifts and graces of the Spirit, according to their places, {rates, and conditions, than they were under the Law. And fo Teter interpreted it, tAtts 2,1 5,1 d, &cc* And what is this to the peoples doing the work of the Minifter, in difpenfing the myfteries of Salvation, preaching the Word, and admi- niftcring Sacraments, &c« which are peculiar to Minifters. But your threefold cord is not eafily broken, 1 John 1. 2 o. 1 Pct.1.5, %svel.i,6. Yes, it is eafily broken ; thofe three Texts eafily anfwered, for they fpcakof a generall un&ion 4 Thy have no examp. to preach not called extraord.as El dad, &ct i u of gifts, which all have ordinarily as Chriftians, not of a pe-.^ culiar unction of gifts, which fome.have extraordinarily, as* Priefts or Mnitters. For there is mention made of knowing all things(ncedfull to falvation)8c or offering up (piriaial Sa- crifice, acceptable to God, which all as Chriftians do, may, and muft- Otherwife,. by this plea of an unftioa from the Spirit, you may rake upon you the function of Kings in the World, as well as of Prieib in t.he Church j for the Rcvela- tionilt joyn^ them both together, faying* He hath mads m Kings and Trie ft s% . If men back't (for I cannot forget that your word) or ra- ther headed, with anopiniative conceit of their extraordi- nary fpirituall gifts mayprelently run up into the Pulpits to preach \ why may not any other, who hath knowledge of the Law,Sc a faculty of fpeaking, go to the Bar 8c plead cau- fes, and be a Sergeant at Law ? afcend up to the Bench,and hear complaints, and be a Juftice of Peace? May every one, who hatli Lome skill in Feats of Arms, and a bold cou- rage, ufurp thejplace of a Captain or Colonell, and take up- on him to manage wars? m No> you will fay, Iamfure, becaufe he wants an autho- rity, a word of command to fuch places : andfo do you a command of the Word to preach, being but a gifted bro- ther : Nay, you want an example too for it, our of the Scri- pture , though you boail of multitudes herein, Eldad and Medady &cc. I ftiall anfwer, and that firft in generall; they are extra- ordinary examples oFa calling from, and by God onely, and therefore not to be drawn into, and pleaded for common precedents : will you lay claim to foroe mens patents in fpe- ciall, foryourand others patterns in generall, todo there- after ? So may youatlaft afcend up on high, and feize upon fome mens peculiars and prerogatives, and make them your particulars and practices : But if for all this, you will be fo inftant (and that in ieafon, and out of frafou) upon fuch ex- traordinary inftances, in this cafe, why did you not ever do fo and in other cafes ? and therefore in ltead of the ordinary weapons, of fword and musket, why did you not arm your telf, when you went into the field, with lamps and empty Q^ pitchers? i 1 2 They have no exampito preach not calkh extraord.as Eldad,drCt pitchers ? for Gideons Souldiers did Co, and with fuch extra- ordinary weapons difcomfited and routed the Midianites : or if your place in the late wars were a Trumpetters or Cor- nets, why did you not blow With Rams horns in ftead of Trumpets, as the Priefts did at the befieging of Iericho> be- caufe once extraordinarily by , or wirti them, the wals of Ie- licho fell, and were blown down ? Jof.%. Jndgrf. I pray, S;r, giveoverthisiunningtoextraordinaries, for proof of ordinary callings or practices, left you refufe alian- 1 wcr to your Quaeres from me, to whom you (ent them, and all refuting of your errours by me, an ordinary man and Mi- ' • nifter,, and expe£t to be fatished and admoniftied by an An* gel from Heaven, becaufe the above-named Gideon^ and the virgin *Marj were fo anfwered in their Quaeres and de- mands, Judg.6, Luke i. Or left I may expert you ftiould be refelled and refuted of thefc your errours, by one of your Cart-horfes,, fpeakingwith mans voice, becaufe God once opened the mouth of Balaams Saddle- Afle , who fie akj**g with mans voice^ forbade the madwffe of ths Prophet , 2 Pct» But fecondly and briefly I anfwer to the particulars,- that all thofe examples which are produced for gifted ordinary, but not ordained Preachers, are meant eicher, rHt, of ex- traordinary and miraculous prophdyings, as Numb. i i.zj, &4ttsri.9. i Sam.iOjii. or fecondly, but a puLMiihing and divulging abroad a thing done, Mark^'i. 9. Lulqe 8. 39. or thirdly, of giving duties in charge by a Comnnfli-juary Offi- cer, iCbron.iT.7. or fourthly, of religious d26* Now, H4 0r rare art^ tdtnirabh D oftrinefor mxtttr And manner. "Now, Sir, prove your extraordinary-calling in like man- ner? what rare and admirable matter is there in your Do- ctrine, which is not ordinary ? what remarkable manner and circumftances are there in your proceedings , which are not ufual ? what fignes and Wonders,and mighty deeds have you wrought in all patience ? Surely? in all impatience you have worded it, and written, mightily and wondroufly againft the Church of EvgUndpnd fome true Doctrines thereof, and the figns of an Apoftate trom it have been wrought amongft us in all impatience, but not in (igns and wonders and migh- ty deeds,unleffe it be of railing and reviling againft us,where- in ycu are even miraculous : If yon have any other miracu- lors power, fhew it, in word or deed, either in fpeaking fud- denly ftrange language^, which you never learned, or in do- ing ftrange cures you never prattifed before. Firft,it youpleafe, write to me another Letter, or preach your next Sermon in Latin>or Greek, ( I will not trouble your Hebrew,rnuch-lefTeyour Perfian,or Parthian,Median,Gap- padocian,Phrygian,Pamphylian,Cretian, and Arabian,and other ftrange tongues, and exotick languages,which the A- poftle?, being extraordinarily called, ipake in an hour, Aft% 2. 8.9.) you fhall fully fatisfy me, and confirm me in the opi- nion, that yon are extraordinarily called, and affifted of the {pint,asthey were, or rather as BaUams beaft was, which on the fudden (pake with mam voice, and humane language, forbidding the madneffe of the Prophet and his Mafter ; and then you may go with full CommitTion, to take a Pulpit in Jamaica as well as High-Eafter ; yea , to be a Preacher to the Weft, or Eaft-Indies,to any Nation of the world, orelfe. Secondly, thus (hew it mc. There i- in my Parifh an aged Lame Crecple5or ic may be, fudV a one m your Parifh , or fome other fick body that hath been bedrid thefe many years; come,take them by the hand, and lift them up , fay- ing, Tabnha^ arife, ftand upright pn chy feet and walk, and if eitherdofo,as ^#.3. and Ait. ^. then I will lay you -arc a man of an extraordinary calling as Peter was, who was now a fifticr of men in extraordinary, not an ordinary fhher-man, but it you can do none of thefe, or the like miraculous Cures? you muft go with me , (and fo with all other, you ought to go) Or rare and admirable Doctrine for matter and manner. - j i r go) for a plain and ordinary man, a Plough-man, and Seedf- man, not a plougher np of the fallow ground of the heart , or a fower of the feed of the word, by any extraordinary calling, or if you be not good at Miracles* nor cannot that way prove your extraordinary calling; doir, as lohn the baptift did, by fome rare and admirable Doctrine, fuch as may benefit this age> which ordinary men have not yet heard and re- ceived, (fo alfo did thofe firfb Reformers, Hierom Hu(h9 lohn of Prague, and others, Doctors in extraordinary.) Alas, Sir, yon and yours have nothing to teach us, but very ordinary flufle ; (where you are right) who knoweth not, what you know ? that, wherein you are your lelf » you call new light, but it is the very old darkneiTe , yours overfpread Germany With, and will do England too , if you be not hindred, new errours raked up, againft the Church and the Miniftry , and rebaptifing Infants formerly baptiled* which are fo far from proving your extraordinary calling unto the Miniftery, that they do evince you to be given up to an extraordinary de- parture from the faith , and deceiveabknefTc of uarighteouf- nefTe,and deluhons of Satan, that Prince of darknefle. And fo now, being beaten of from an extraordinary call, you muft betake your felf to an ordinary call, or none at all,if you will plead at lafl, an ordinary call : Then whether your gifts be acquired, or infpired, thcfetwo things you muff be ; rirft, able to reprove and convince He retikesj and flop the mouths of Gain-layers. Secondly, you mult be feparate from your other fecular, and Lay-calling for the work of the Mi- *" nillery: but you are neither. For how can you convince Heretike*, and flop the mouth who cannot afleadge Scrip- ture, or, any Text in the Letter, as who are illiterate, and know nere a Letter of the Book, or Bible, Hebrew,or Greek,, wherein it was written and penned ? Learned Heretikesjyea, Jefuites and fuch, may, and will, at times, and to fuch as you, relufe the Mother- tongue Tranflation , and call for the Spirit-tongue Original, telling you, the Tranflation of fuch* and fuch a Text cited by you, is falfe and erroneous,and how will you help your felf, or anf wer him, feeing you are unlet- tred,and skill not the Original languages. So neither, Secondly , are you teparate from your other Q.3 te~ ii6 The*) muft bwt alfo afepirathnfrom their ficular call~ fecular and lay-calling, as you muft, if you will be aMlni- fter and Preacher ; you mi1 it have a feparat-on for theMi- nifteriall work, and a mifllon alfo and comtrrffion in an or- dinary way done by the Church, and the Officers and Pa- ftours in the fame, with farting, and prayers, and laying on of hands, as I have fhewed beiore, this is the ordination the Apoftles (peak of, and of which, we tbeordinary Minifters of the Church of England have been partakers. See A£ts 13.3. And when they had fafitdy and frayed) and Jaldtheir hands on them, Barnabat and Saul being feparate ,by the command of Chrift,/^" the workwhereunto they were calledythey fentthem away : and in the v erf e following, the holy Spine owneth this mflion of the Church there as it's own, they be- ing fertt away , or forth of the holy Ghoft , departed unto Se/eu- cia, Sec. Thus the Apottles ordained Min' iters m the Chur- ches, as appears both jift's 6, 6, ia the fir ft Deacons? and af- ter in T/wof/y , 1 Timoth.4.14. With payers and lay 'mg on of hands. Now, I pray, fhew u<, what feparat 'on there hath been of you, to the work of the Miniftery, when a? rather you keep and hold your old conjunction to the Plough and Cart, Cave that now and then, in a fit of (I know not what) zeal, you ftarr, and fling up into the Pulpit? Have you not rather made a feparation from the Church, than for the Church of Chrift ? and where, and when, and of whom have you had your Miflion, with fading and prayer, and laying on of the hands of the Presbytery, or Presbyters ? Surely, if than before in the ASU be true, that Paid and Barnaba* are faid to be fent forth of the Spirit, when the Church before laid hands on them , and lent them forth ; it may be fufpe&ed, that God fends you not forth into the Miniftery^ becauCe the Church doth not : nor will be therefore with you , by giving you fuccefle, or affording you comfort in this your bold un- dertaking, and unwarrantable intrufton , both againft the Command of Chrift and Examples of his Apoftles, which yet, for us, his lawfully deputed Minifters he hath promifed, he ever wil 1 , Math , 2 8 .2 o . If you fhall fay — (but I rather believe you know it not, Soc'miwj your Grandmafter dothfay fo, io defence of his un- called Jhej want imf option of hands at Ordination, 117 called calling.) That impoficion of hands i> but a meer Ce- remony and circumltance , ineffectual as to the conftituting of a Minifter, or Preacher ' Imuft tell you, the Apoftles, and Antiquity following, who ulcd it did not think fo ; for then they would not have ufed it To (olemnely in their ordinati- ons, nor have reckoned it for one of the Principles of the Do- ctrine of Chrilt , and have ranked it in the lame account, (laying on of hands J with repentance from deadworkj , faith to- wards God^Dottrine of baptifmes^refurreftion of the dead , and eternal Judgement , as he doth, Heb d.i . and i» Two of thefe fix principles you have fcrupled ar, and fcnblcd againft, and you may come in the aid, to do the fame, at, and againft the other four ,if God be not more gracious and mercifuil to you, and you more mode ft, and watchfull over your felf . Yea, but (you will fay) when this laying on of hands was ufed, as by the Apoftles, it was a means of conveying the HolyGhoft, and the fpecial gifts of the fame, which were confequent upon it, as in Timoth. 1 Ti/w.4.i4.and Aft. 8. 1 84 but now, thefe being ceafed, the other alio is of no force : ve* ry well, if laying on of hands at ordination mult ceafe , be- caufe fpecial gifts of the fpiric are ceafed > how come you to have, or rather boaft fo much of the gift of the fpiric, and the fpecial gifts of the i pirit ? you fhould be willing the rather for the continuance , at lcaftwife for the introduction again , of laying on of hands,.if fuch a friend, and familiar of the fpiric, and it's gifts, you be, as you pretend to be. But howfoever it fhould be granted, laying on of hancfc,to be ceafed, as to that effect of giving the Holy Ghoft, and the fpecial gifts thereof , fo that thefe are not alwayes given, where that is done ; ( though I queliion not of fome particu- lar influence, or affiftance of the fpiric going along with it flillj yet it is in force, and effectual ftill, as to fignine a fepa* ration of fuch perfons, upon whom hands are thus laid, horn fecular and prophane, and fo confequently an application of them to holy and f acred u(es» or Offices, as appears both in the old Teftament,X*»*.8«i4. and in the New (before) All. . 13. ■*. and 3. 5oSt.7Wfaithofhimlelf,1^?0*. i.i.thac he was foamed for the Gofpelef God ^ horn his old trade and ftudiesjbuthow? ^#,£.16.17. J. By a miraculous de~ figna^- 1 1 8 Offofuhr Elefiion. fignation, and calling him to die Office of a Minifter. But a. lr was further conhrmed,and allured unto him,by Ananias his coming to him, and laying his hands on him : and again, renewed unto him upon a particular Mlfion 5c reparation of him to the Miniftery of Gentiles, and hying on of hands, as I have (hewed out of the tAtt.i 3. &cc. But (it may be) you ownyour Miniftery,upon another ac- count than all thefe , namely upon the account of the people, or a popular election. I pray make out but this ; for I am very deiirou; to take you off any way from being a felf-or- dainer, or a felf-intruder. For no man taketh this honour to himfeif, but he that was catted ofGody as was Aaron , Hebt 5 . 4, Now you were not called of God as was Aaron , (your felf will not fay it,) were you called of the people as was Aaron i Aaron was called of that people , to make them a Calf , or Gods to go before them ; were you called of any people , to make them a Minifter to preach before them ? Tell mCywhat did this people unto thee, that thou haft brought fo great a fin upon them, Exod.32.1,21 and thy felf too ? Sure- ly, they laid no hands on you i perhaps, they might hold up. their hands, or lift up that voyces,that is the manner of popular elections. But glory not in this ; for Att, 19.28. all the people with one voyce cried up Diana, great U Diana of the Ephefians. Or, was there fuch a Vifion appeared to you in the night, as once there did to Paul, Aft. 1 6. 1 9, There ftood a man of CMacedonia , fo did there fland a man of High-Matter, or of tjfttasburj) and prayed you , faying, Come over unto us , and. help us, * and fo immediately you went, affuredly gathering that the Lord hath called you to preach theGofpel there? But the night is pahS the day is come ; now, neither we old men do dream dreams, nor you young fee Vifions, as to ga« therfrom them any thing of our being called from God , to thi7, or that. But, fcrioufly, did you fubmit your felf and your, extraor- dinary, and fpecial gifts, unto the ordinary people , and vul- gar fort for Trial ? It is the fir ft and belt humility , I have difcovered in you hitherto^ was there not a great divifion of judgements amongft them, and aconfufiou of voices, as at the OffopuUr Eh ft ion. ~~ ^ij the 32. verfe, of the 1 p. of the ABs before mentioned ,'Come crying one thing,and (orae anocher,the Affembly being con- futed, and the more part not knowing wherefore they were come together, fo it isufnally ? Me thinks, Sir, you flionld not have done it ; for people, the common and vulgar peo- ple, ate full of ignorance, and too blinde , to Ele£t their Souls Overfeer, even as the filly (heep, unfit to choofe their (hep- heard; theyhave not that meet, and competent judgement, to difcerne and determine of the fitting and requifite parts of a Minifter. It is true, and too true, that people following their private , though mifguided fancies, ambitiouflydeure rather to have Minifters of their own diforderlychoofing, than perfons rightly Ele&ed and Ordained, according to the word ; but St. Pauly 2 Tim, 4.3. foretold both this, and the evil illue of this popular Election. The time will come when they will not endure found Doftriney but after their own lufls (hall they heap to them (elves Teachers ^having itching ears-} and they (had turn away their e ares from the truth , and (hull be turned unto fables, Befides , by this means is Created' ( it may be ) too ftraight a dependency of the Minifter upon the people, that he apply himfelf and his obfervanceofthem,to their irre- gular courfes, and for fear of their difpleaf ure , or his oWn dammage,preach fmooth and flea fing things , E(ai 3 o.io. But why not the people? had not the people a hand in fepara- ting, and confecrating, and ordaining of the Levites , fee Numb. 8. 9, 1 o. thou (halt bring the Levites before theTaber* nacle of the Congregation , and thou (hall gather the whole affem" bly of the Children of Ifrael together,and thopifhdt bring the Le- vites before the Lord^and the Qhildren of Ifrael (hull put their hands upon the Levites : did we not make, laying on ot hands, a chief matter in ordination ? It is anfwered, the whole Af- fembly of the people were prefent at the Confec ration of the Levites , (as who of them will, may be at our Minifters ordi- nation:) but a&ed nothing by Tuffrage, nor elected by voyce., This putting on of their hands upon the Levhes , was onely in token, and to (hew, that the Levhes were prefented to Gods fervice, inftead of all, and in Lie w of their brethren, the firft born, wr/. 1 4. thus (halt thou (faith God to Mofes) feparate the Levhes from the Children oi Ifrael; and the Levites (hall be mine. K But 120 Of Popular Elcfiion. But that of the 6*. of the Atts 3. and 5» feems to come up clofcr to the people , wherefore brethren (the twelve Apoftles fpeak to the multitude,) lookjjott out amongft jott (even men of hone ft report, fall of the Holy Ghoft and wifdom yand they chofe ■ Stephen, and the reft of the Deacons : I anfwer* t. It appears that the Deacons Office is the moft inferiour of the Sacred Orders,and then,chiefly imployed in ferving Tables at their dayly Mm iterations. 2. The Apoftles abated of their juft and due Authority upon the reafons , both of gratifying the people,.and withall of avoiding fuipicion of the love oi mony and being bufie bodies. Thirdly,, verf,6. Look ye out among you feven, whom we may appoint, that the people fet the feven before the A- poftles,, and when they had prayed, they,, (the Apoftles) laid their hands on them. So that the the peoples choofing, was a kind of prefenting and nominating of certain a&le and fir perfons, fo far as they could judge of them by their out- ward fpeech. and converfe with them ; and fo they concur- red as Propounders, Teftifiersand Approvers of them, as to their life and manners ; but the Apoftles were the Electors/ andOrdaincrs of them to thatMiniftery, upon their better, difcovery and judgementsot their fpirituall abilities, and di{cerningstheir excellent gifts needful! thereunto-: in which, refpeft (becaufe I will multiply no more objections or an- swers) it isfaid, I Cor.14.29. Let fhe Prophets fpeak^ two or three, and let the other judge ; that is, (if by, other, the people {landing by be meant) of their outward frame of fpeech and. eloquution, and application,, and as to their carriage* life,, and conversion, (thefeare fubjeclto the peoples cogni- zance, )but not as to the difcerning and determining of their, deep knowledge,- and hidden abilities, neceflary for a Mini- fter,and required by the Apoftle (fo the fpirits oi the Pro- phets? and their gift ,. are fubjeft to the Prophets.) But I will (hut up this matter with a word of coun(ell,(and . let my counfell. be acceptable to you, as coming from x friend that wifheth nothing but good . to you) break off this tin by repentance, and rightroufnefle (your difordered and un warrantable afcending up into the Pulpit, withouc miflion or commifTion) and. this iniquity, by (hewing refpeft and obedience U&zah andUzziab, drc. Examples againft Intruders. 12 1 obedience to the authority and orders of the Church; It way he a lengthening of your tranquility (or peace of confer- ence, atleaftwife) or (as it is in the margin) a healing of your errour, D<**,4*47 . * Remember V*x>*h and V&z>i*h ; v&x.ab prefuming without a calling from God, put his hand to the Ark of God to hold it up, which was the Priefts office to do, the Lord was wroth with him,8c fmote him in that very place, he did it in, * Sam.6t6.to 8. Vz.z,iahyo\x of the pride, more than the zeal of his heart, i Ckron,?.6,ii, (Tnark chat I pray , zeal is pretended by you, it may be pride of heart, vcrf.i <5.) went into the Temple of the Lord, took a cenfer to burn in-^ cenfe to the Lord , and whileft he was contending with the Priefts, who withftood him in it, the Lord was in- cenfed, the leprofie even rofe in his forehead, (mark that alfo,ver{.i9. the punilhmenc appeared there mft, where thefinfhewed itfelf firft, in his brazen, impudenr, fhame- lefle forehead) the words of reproof and counfell, that Az,a- riah the Pnelt fpake to him, are very emphaticall, verf.i 8. and I will fpeakthem over, with application to you ; It pr- taineth not unto theey ZJz>z>i#hy to burn incenfe unto the Lord^ but to friefts, that are conlecrated thereto : (It pertaineth not to you , Sir,to difpenfc the my fteries of the Word in publike, to adminifter Sacraments, to remit or retain fins, sec. bat to Minifters who are ordained.) Go out of the Sanctuary, for thou haft trefpafled : (come down out of the Pulpit , for thou haft tranfgrefted) neither (hall it be for thine honour from the Lord God : ^neither will you have any honour or comfort of what you have done, or do the fame way with- out a due calling. God will caft fhame and confufion upon your face and forehead : ) if then, Sir, you tender your life and your honour, ufurp not the Minifters place and office, left your name may be added unto the two above named, Vz.z,ah and Vx,z,uhy for a third : and you be called Bhz*- z,ardiah : or left your name and perfon will be added for a fourth, to the three named Core-> Ddthtnjxnd Abiram, Num. 1 6. and you partake of the like or other judgements, if you perfift to encroach upon the Minifters office, and leek the Priefthood alfo. But if you think that thefe men already R 2 named 122 Ceunfell ts Intruders into the Mini fiery . named are not finable to you, as I con Me they ate not, as to their pcrfons and worth, (though yet your and their pra- ctices are very like and the tame) br Core-> Datkan^ and Abi- ranty were Princes of the Aflembly, famous in the Congre- gation, men of renown, and fonsof Levi : Vz,z,iah was a King, and Vscz,ab fomc per (on of note fure, becaufe Da&id took his death fo heavily,and called the place P&ez,iX)i6tikbi in memory of him* Then there is anoiher very fitting in Zachary^ where the Lord faith, It jha!i come to pajj'e in that day (the day yet to come to pail'e) The Prophets jhall be afhamed^ every one of his vifony neither jhall they wear a rough garment, (or a black cap) to deceive , but he jhall fay , I am no Prophet , / am an Husbandman, for man taught me to keep cattle from my youth, Zaeh. 13.4,5. And as here you fee the ftiame of ir, as to credit ; io verf.3 . you may fee alfo the danger of k9 as to life. Befides, what do you do, but hereby ftrengthen the hands, and confirm the movth or our adverfaries of Rome, Papifts and Jeluites, who charge our Proteftant Churches with want ot Orders and Ordination, and tels us, that all forts of Tradefmen and Artificers, with U5, handle the Word and Sacraments, by preaching the one, and admini- ftering the other, tothegreatdifhonourof God, and pro- pbanation of his Ordinances. But it may be, you are little moved by this, in regard of your being a (ecret friend to Rome, as Rome hath been as clofe a mate to you and your party. Therefore know? that all Churches in Europe, I may adde, all Nations in the world, have ever, and do (till hold a difference of callings, Secular and Ecclefiailicall, Popular and Sacerdotall : and therefore much more the Churches of God, and cfpccially the reformed ones, dofo, and ought todofo. What God hath joyned together, let no man put afunder •* fo, What God hath put afunder, as the Laity and Miniftry, let no man joyn together. If you have fuch an itching tongue(as there be others that have itching ear?, ready for you) and fuch a hot delire to the profeffion ot a Minift er, (This is a true faying, if a man dsfire the office of a Bijhopyor Prebyter$,fo dejireth a good tvor^i Tim.. 3.1.) do,asfome others I could tell of, have done, (eparate your Ccunfel to intruders into the Mini flry. 123 your felf for the work, go and approve yonrfelf and your gi'tts unto the Elders and Officers 01 the Church, as well as to the people, that fo, in fading and prayer before, as alio after, they may lay hands on you, and you may be lent forth, and ordainjd , and ordered Minifterwith Authority and power to preach, (your former Sermons going (by .permiflion) foe your trial and probation Sermons onely.) - ] doubt. not., buc you will fride a ready way, and the door open , and to thofc, that will be wiling to lec you in, and give you the right hand of fellowship j enter by the door into the iheepfold,and climb not up the other way, leauV^r . There is no fuch confufion in our Common-? wealth* that aPhyfician may encroach upon the Lawyers pofeifion, or an ordinary Trader- man mayufurp upon the Phyficians pra- cHe. Is our Church of England h corrupt and iawleile, as that of Ifrael was, in the dzyesot Jeroboam , who mads of the lowefi of the people , Priefts of the High places ; yea , whofoever would, he confer at ed him, and he became one of the Trie ft s of the High p laces , (but this thing became fin unto, the houfe of Jcro-' boam, even to cut it ofy and to deftroy it from the face of the earth) 2King.13.33.and 34. OristheFunctionofaMinifterfoeafie, and ready that every -man may take unto himfelf this honour,though he be iTOt caHed as Aaron,znd that whofoever cometh to confecrate him- felf with a young Bullock^, and f even Ram* , the fame trtay be a Prieft i 2 Chron.i 3.9. IconferTe,mine is but a fingle>fole<,Coun{eltoyou:But St. Paul doubled it, and reduplicated it, and for all, as well as you , I Cor. "j ,1 o. let every man abide in the fame call:n elfe you leave one part of your oldQoaeres, what Command, or Example of Chrift.or his Apoftles have you for thefe, and thefe your pra&ifes? But, Sir, for what particular here is it that youQiiaere, and demand them ? Is it for our maintenance at all I Or for maintenance from thofe, who are not willing to pay it us , it going againft their conlcience ? Or is it.our forcing of main- tenance from fuch, and our fuing them at the Law > I believe youQusre all of them, but efpedally, knowing better the frame of your fpirit , than I underftand the form of your words, I apprehend you ftrike at the main, our Maintenance, as our Maintenure ; this falling, the reft muft follow necefla- rily. For if you thought our Maintenance due in Law , and of right belonging to us, then you would not, yon could not deny us the benefit of the Law, to fue for it, and to force fuch as are not willing to pay it, though pretending it to go a- gainft their confciencc. Therefore according to your inten- tion defired,or defire intended, our Maintenance in general, (fo you name it) I (hall Warrant, from the Word ; nothing elfe, I fee, will ferve your turn: neither the light of nature amongft all Nations , even Heathenijh • nor the pofitive con- ftitutions of Emperours, and the Civil Law, nor the ancient pra&ife of the Churches of God , nor Atts of yourown Na- tive Countrey, nor the Common Equity, or the Right Rea- fon of the thing it f elf , are (I perceive) of any, or much force with you for our Maintenance. Onely, the word of Chrift muft do it ; and it is that, there- fore, that (hall do it, if yet, even that will do it with you, Luke FuH Maintevdnce dne toMiniJlers. 125 Luke 1 o. 7- the Labourer is worthy of his hire, it%sfpoken of the Apoftles and their Maintenance, 1 Tim, 5.1 7. and 1 8. let the Elders that Rule be counted worthy of double Honour ; ejpecially, they, who labour in the Word and Doctrine , for the labourer is wor- thy of bu reward. There is almoft a whole Chapter to the purpof e ) \C»r,g. 7. who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges j» (and our Miniftry is a warfare, as Num, 4.23. the ferviceofthe LevitcfiS fo called, a warfare:) who pUnteth a Vineyard, and eateth not the f run thereof f ( And Paul planteth , the Minifters are Chrifts under-vine-dreflers,) who feedeth a fioc^and eateth not of the Mdkjf the pckj (And Minifters are the Over-leers, Feeders, and Chrifts under-fhepheards of the flock,) verl.i I ♦ if wefow to you fpirhual things, is it a great thing ifwejhallreapyour carnal things ? (fo great a thing, chat it fhould go againft your confcience , and make you unwil- ling to pay ? ) verf.l 3 . do ye not know, that they which Atinifter about Holy things, live of the things of the Temple } and they which wait at the Altar, are partakers of 'the Altar} veil 14. even fo hath the Lord ord^ined^that they wh'tch preach the Gefpel,(hould live 0 f the Gofpel, You thought, (it may be) we of the Miniftry had no more but, (8c we are tliankfull for thattoo) an Ordinance of Lords and Commons in Parliament* or a Statute Law of the Land for our Maintenance (that made you fo zealous againft the fame* and fo clamorous for a word and Command of Chrift out of Scripture for it,) if no more, yet StSPeter tells you, you are to fubmityour felt to every Ordinance of Man for the Lords lake, 1 Pet, 2. 1 ?. and for confcience fake, %gm. 13. 5* whileft they Ordain things honeft Sc lawfull ^ for the powers that are, are orda;ned of the Lord, Rom, 13. 1. but I hope I have flaked your flame, 8C ftopt your mouth with a greater and better Ordinance, even this of our Lord Jefiii Ghrift,for all his ordained Minifters of the Gofpel , who preach the Go- fpel unto his people, to have a Maintenance thereout » and fuch as they may live of, f without their own other lively- hoods, if they have any bequeathed them elfewhere;) and lb live of it, that they may be given to Hoffnallty ; as the fame Apoftle requireth f interpreting his own meaning^ 1 X/w.3 .2 . The which, how can it be, that a Minifter flaould be given to 12 6 Full Maintenance due to MiniHers. to Hofpitality towards others , when he hath not a Mainte- nance given him, and to full,astolivcof ithimlelf » and to help others to live,and io to maintain Hofpitality : For how- foevcr. Tome there may be, f and but a very fewfuch there arej who having a plentitull Eftate of their own, do betake themlelves to the Minitlry, as of late a worthy Gentle-man of Suffolk Mr. Luc AS) c whom I name for Honour to him, and to the Miniftery alfoj being oi 600./. per annum, was ordain- ed a Presbyter, or Minister by a Reverend Biihop there- abouts living, (like as formerly the younger Sons of Earle> and Lords, uiually in this Land did enter into Sacred, and Sacerdotal Orders, and became many, or moil: of them Bi- (hops,as our Hiftories Do mention,; vet if any {uch,or he mail be mftituted, and inducted into any Paftoral ,or Paro- chial charge, or cure, or but preach conftantly to a Congre- gation, there lieth upon the people ol the fame a Duty and Obligation, for to maintain him, out of their Eftate?, Cnor is he bound to live upon his own, though, he may preach freely too, if he think good, and law caule '<•) and thac upon the grounds I have (hewed ; and the Apoftle would have ir, not a bare and- ignoble, but a full and Honourary mainte- nance, l Tim, 5.17. Let the Elders that Rule welly and efpecially they , wh* labour in the word and DoUrineybe counted worthy of double Honour : (whereof one is, Maintenance , and therefore it mult be a Honourary, or an Honourable Maintenance;) giving this reafon, for the Labourer is worthy of his Hire: and as he is worthy, fo (faith the Apoftle) let him be connted Worthy of it, and not of Hire onely, but of Honour x and dou- ble Honour? Maintenance, and Efteem , and Juch roaintc nance as may be a Honour to him to receive, as a Honour to the people to give •• fuch a maintenance,thac out of ir,he may have proviiion for himfelf, and (hew Hofpitality to others in need. But I think verily, St* iWforefeein&the envious Niggar- dife, and injurious covetoulnefte, was even then peeping out, or would foon arife, altered theDefcription a little of a Mini- fter, in Titus 1. 8, faying, he mult be a lover of Hofpitality ; from that he had fet down before in Timothy •> 1 Tim. 3,2. that [\z muft.be given to Hofpitality, preparing us aforchand, that Tythes, Minifiets dm Maintenance. 127 that if through peoples refuting , or fuhftra&ing. ungratefully our maintenance , we cannot be Timothies ygiven to Hofpitali- ty; yet wcmnft be Tim's, Lovers of Hoipitality, thatforour good wills may be, where our good deeds cannot ; and there God will accept the will for the deed. But (it may be) you think me allthiswhilc.ro bebefides my Text : (you will like me ne're the worfefor that , becaufe therein liliall be the liker to you:) likeenough, I may not hitherto* have hit upon the Scope thereof': The Text, I am fure> I am in, tor that's, maintenance. But you meant, (me- thinks, 1 hear you hithci, fay fo) maintenance by Tythes, or of Tythes, that -particular- maintenance,it is^that goeth againft tiie co iloience of good people, and which they are (o unwilling to pay, (not maintenance in general , or general maintenance, a Penhon, or Stipend, or Benevolence , or fuch like Competency, at their will and pleaiure , they are, and lhallbevery willing and well pleafed to- allow,) \ b . But then,wh y did you not write fd)Or fend me your mean- ing by your Meilenger ? will.you alwayes lye in the Clouds of the-sky, and .walk in the lhad.es of the night ? will you ne- ver learn to write true £»g//)fr,-right reafon, good fenfe , aaid your plain meaning ? "Well, Ltake your meaning, and I bopejl fhalL finde. you dire£t and plain now. Your defire .is ,.of a word , or YV ar- rant, from the Word ofChri(t,)for our Tythe*maihtenance, or our maintenance, that way of Tythes ; you fhalL have it. And I will give it you b firiiout of the New Teftament, whence you much defire ir, I know, and , where (you think) it is leaft to be had : but youmuftnot expert to find the name and word (of Tythes) in every place, in ib many Letters and Syllables, you know we are agreed upon this already,and be- fore, that if a thing be implicitly there, or way consequently be thence drawn 7m a right way of ' r.eafon'wg,it fu^icethm Fir ft, therefore confider you (you will ianaii put many confiderati- "ons to mt) upOnG^A, 6, 6^ Met him that. is taught, in the wordy fommun'tiate mto'bim-that teacheth in all 0 oo d things , or in all goods S I think- I may nterpret, that are his: Tne precept is plain, let him Communicate, the matter is as plain, in all good things $ I fhaU not need to Itay proving either : The S manner 128 Tythes, Minifters due Maintenance. manner how he muft do it .that's the buhnefle,and which may be the way : Surely , that way and manner of mainte- nance which advifeth beft, and conduceth to a Communica- tion in all good thing0, from the taught to the Teacher, that bed fulfilleth the Apoftles precept. But the way and man- ner of Tything advifeth bcft,and conduceth moft to a Com- munication in all good things , from the Taught to the Teacher -.Therefore that way and manner of maintenance bed fulfilleth the Apoftles precept ; it's plain , that Tythe, or Tenth, is a Communication in all good things, Communica- ble ; is, 1 faypr fhould be, and the Apoftlemay allude, (why may he not) to the old praft ife of Communication in Abra- ham to Mtlchifedek^, Genefa 4.2 o. who gave him Tjthe of all ; of all there,and in al^hcre? what's the difference? or if Tythes do not beft fulfill the Apoftles precept, lam fure, they do it better then your Pcnftonsy Stipends,Benevolences> Contributions y and gatherings , which are Communications unto your Teachers, but onely in fome particular good, things money , or the liki-i and not in all good things. Secondly, confidcr upon that Text of Scripture , 1 Cor.'gl 14. Even foy hath the Lord ordained, that 'they , who preach the Cjofpelyjhoiild live of the Gofpel, I cited this before, for proof ©t our Minifters maintenance ingeneral : me thinks, there is fomcthing in it of particular aime atTythes. Firft,it the words, even fo, refer to the whole vcrfe (as they do and muft) then Minifters living of the Gofpel , is to be after the famplar and pattern of the Prefts living of the Altar,exceptinglch things as are abrogated and cealed* being Typical and Ceremonial,as Sacrifices : but Tythes , or the Tenths of the increafe were none of tli3ie,or fuch things, and thercforcas they lived of their Tythes, and fome other things; even forthe Lord hath ordaincd,we fhould live of the fame companion*, and Similitudes muft run on'all four leg', or feet j in what this may fuite with a Gofpel Minifter , it muft run on, as in Tythes it may : in what it will not agree to fucb,as in Sacrifices it muftgive out,as, who brought their Tythes up to the places where the Bifhop & Presbyters kept tor their maintenance, and the relief of the poor. Secondly, to what purpofe elfe. doth. the Apoftle fay, (even Jposiles mnen)ojment no prejudice tout. 12? (even fo) having immediate' 7 before alledgcd the Priefts of the old Teftament their maintenance by Tithes* 8cc. if it be not to prove the Minifters of the Gofpel their maintenance (hould be the fame, or at leaft wife as good, if not better, as their Miniftery is the better. Thirdly, what a pattern is here, the Tithes of the Priefts of the Altar, and what a rule hereby taken, and what a di- rection hereout given for the maintenance of the Minifters, and the allowances of people under the Gofpel, if nothing of tithes be here intended,or meant for the one from the other: the Apoftle then might, and would have left our, (even fo) and have onely faid, The Lord hath ordained. Fourthly, the maintenance here fpokcnof, isan*r^;W ent, and that of the Lord, and fo is a part of God* fervice and wotlhip, as every Ordinance of his is. Now Tithes are fo called in the Scripture, and fofaid to be: Qiewme, if you can, where Stipends voluntary, and arbitrary Penfions are fuch, or fo called, in any place, ordained j an ordained maintenance, for ordained Minifters, belt fuits. Fifthly, the Apoftle reafoneth and argueth for Come par- ticular and fetled maintenance for the Minifters of the Go- fpel, which had becninufc formerly, and was ordinary in the Church, and had been ordained in it} and what was that,but Tithes ? Sure, he did not reafon for a maintenance that was never in ule in the Church, extraordinary, and ex- tra-ordained ; not for an uncertain^indefinite,undetermined, I know not what, Penfions or Stipends. ■ True indeed, the Apoftle himfelf? living in hard and diffi- cult times, when manifold encumbrances lay upon him, and j>erfecutions abode him every wherc,8£by reafon of his con- tinuall peregrination? into all Countries (as the cafe was the like with the other Apoftles) could never have the oppor- tunity to demand, or enjoy the forefaid maintenance, in the ordinary way, but either lived (extraordinarily) on others alms (in effed) or his own labour: And therefore it's ab- furdly done and peevilhiy , of thofe who fend us to fcek and find our maintenance out of the ule and practice of the A- poftles of thofe former primitive times: were they fuch times with us, we would do as we might, and muft do as S a they 1 3 o Right to tit bes continue, when pot received . ttiey did. But we'doand may cake leave* to live now not by their examples. herein, buc -ty their precept", tome of which have more than glimpfed out unto us our maintenance by the Tithes or the Tenths of the increafe, Solikewife if you Quaere, wby the ..Apoftles fuccecding Chrift, and the reft ot the Primitives did not .claim their due and right of Tithes, as from Chrift, and poileflc them- lelves of the fame, it's eafily anfwered , that the Princes and Emperours, both in their dayes, and a longtime after, for many years were fo ungodly, and unchriftian, or Anticnri- Itian, that they would not yejld to .Gods ordinance, and to Minifters rights herein, but rehired ,.yea,,and perfecutcd that way, (as yon and others do now.) Therelore the Apoftles lived upon other extraordinary waves, the alms and gratui- ties of the Converts, the money of the lands fold Sc brought-, and laid at the Apoftles feet, yea, andlansixgivenr and or- dered not to be fold, but to be a ftanding tent 'for relief? follow Chrift Jefus, and would have u; to be his followers, no lurther than he is of Chrift. For thirdly , thus far our Saviour Chrift went before, Matth, 23,23. reproving the Pharilees for their hypocrifie? m doing Come things they ought to do, and thereby thinking to efcape for not doing fome other things they ought to do ; he faith thus^'Tefay tithe of mint, cummin, andanife, and have omitted the weightier matters of .the Law, thefe ought ye to have doney and not to'leavethe other undone. Ye ought not to leave the other undone, the paying tithe of mint, cummin, and anife. Surely, what our Lord Chrift, commanded, not tobs omitted, that all the votes and fufTrages of men, all the or- ders and ordinances of aState ought not to command ihould be omitted : But Chrift hath commanded paying tithes not to be omitted. And this command for paying of tithes, is fo much the more valid and of force, for that eHewhere,when there was fpeech and action alio, about wauling of hands, . coming from market, and before meals, and other ceremoniall mat- ters, he omit teth them himf elf, in his own perfon, he is an Advocate to defend them alfo who did omit them;yea,S£ is S 3 the t It hath performed that thing for which it was made, cna£ted,and defigned, namely the maintenance ofGodsMinifter, without the complaint of any, untill Papi- ftical impropriations began to cut chefinewesof that Law> and gave thereby the Church of England ; efpecially, occa- fion of complaint, and of precaution likewife, to uphold and maintain the yet breathing though bleeding body of that, Law Right to Tythes centime^ when net received. 133 Law of Tythes , againft the Jefuitical- Anabaptiftical ex-» communications and Annihilations. And thus I have given you lome light, (New lighr, I may fay, it is to you, but better than your New light) more, (per- haps) than you looked for, or are willing to look after , and that not onely glimmering , but fhining out in the New Te- ftament. ( What ? will you go along with me, up, unto the Old Te- ftament, and fee what word , or Command of God is there alfo for this maintenance of Miniftcrs by Tythe? For can two walk together except they be agreed ? this,(ure, is agree* able to our Saviours Rule, in matter of queftion about di- Yorcejto fearch, how it was from the beginning, and of old 1 and will it not do asVell, in this matter ot your Quaere,about maintenance of Tythes, as in that ? For it is your purpofe and project* (as may ealily befeen) to make, or fue out a di- vorce betwixt us and our Tythes , (and we mult not fue for them) and therefore you drew up thi>your bill ot Divorce- ment,, (your Quaere,) and Tent ft to me, but I anlwer from the beginning it was not fo,God made them Priefts and Ty thes> or Miniftcrs and maintenance at ftrft in the Old Teftamcnc alfo. Thofe therefore, which God hath \oyned together , Priefts and Tythes, 1st no man fut afwder. Math. 1 9.6. I (hall, as next in my way and Method,take in at Mal^.jl the end of the beginning,the laft Prophet ot the Old Te (la- ment, and begin with him. Thus that Prophet faith there : ye are gone away from mine Ordinance^ and have not kept themy what Ordinances? verf.8. j* have robbedme^ibhc challengeth them of the breach of his eight Ordinance, or Command- ment, which forbiddeth ftealing and robbing ; ye have rob- bed me (faith the Prophet,in the name of God) but wherein? in Tythes andOfferings^ fa'th the fame : at the 9. verf. the fe- lons are purtued not onely with huy and cry, and curfes, and maledictions againft them, 7* *re.cur fed with a enrfejorye have rebbedme yeven this whole Ration, (Though it be a Con>» mon cuftomc to do fo, and a National fin,t hat will not evade the being taken with this curfe onely that will do ir,to which the Prophet invites them in the 1 o. verfe, and pK to return unto the Lord >.and, bring all the Tythes into the Store- houfe, 1 34. Tythes not Ceremonial. honfe, that there may be meat m my houfe.) But alio the Prophet invites them thereto, by the promife of repreivals and pardons, of many, and manifold bleflings, and fuch as they moil refpe&ed; prove me now herewith faith the Lord, if I will not open.unto yon the windows of Heaven, and pour out a bleflfing, that there fhall not bs room enough to receive „ it, & verf.i i . I will rebuke the devourer lor your fakes,and „he ftiall not deftroy the irmts'of your ground, v. 12. and all „ Nations (hall call you bkfTed, and ye ftiall be a delight- ?>lome Land,(aith the Lord oi Heaven. I know, whatprefentSy run-in your minde, whenfoever we alleadge any thing for 1 ythes out of the old Teitament. Pi(h,they are Ceremonial things, and concern not us under the New Teitament : ( Let then, thofe Text , that I have al- leadged out of the New Teftament concern you,and fo they do, if you can difcerne them.) B^it Sir , you are deceived ; Ty thes and Offerings, though mentioned in the Old Tefta- menr,arcnot therefore Ceremonial; for they are mentioned' there, before the Law of Ceremonies came in; as you wilt hear anon : if Tythes and Offerings (beuig fo joyned here, I: will not dif-joyn them) ii they had been Ceremonies, the Prophet Malachi would . never have fpoken of them fo ho* nourably and magnifically as he doth ; never have prefTed and urged themfohorly and zealoufly !a's he doth; would rather have buffered them to have lien a cold and rotted its the field,than called for them to be taken into the warm and preferving Store- hov>(es-; fhew me any where amongft the Prophets, 6r in the Old Teftament, where the performing of a Ceremonial duty is,as here,the bringing in of -the Tythes into the Lords Store- houfes , countenanced and encouraged to, with the promifes of inch fblemne and lingular bleflings ; or where the neglect of a Ceremonial tiling is,as here the not rendring the Tythes, frighted andpurfued with the threat- nings of direfullcurfes and malediction. lie ask you but one Qua»re here, and I have done with this;Doyou think Tythes are aCei emunial thing of the oldTeftamentewhen as the lloc paying of them, is the breach of the Moral Law, even of that e'ghth Commandment,and fo no leiTe than Theft and Rob- bery, the higbe(t,of God j yea, a double Robbery , both of God and man ? But Tythes not Ceremnial. 135 Bun you look for examples out of the word, as well as Com- mands and Laws for our maintenance by Tythes 5 for fo you call for both in your querulous Quaere's, and indeed both will do well together, the holy precepts of God, are the true pra- crifeof the Saints ; and the true praclife of the Saints may be as a holy precept Irom God unto us , therefore I flaall hardly finde them fevered, they go fo together.K reafon alio with them , embracing each other. In the 2Chron. 31.4. the good King Hezekiah commanded the people that dwelt id Hie- iufalem, to give the portion of the Friejis andLevites unto them, (the greatelt part whereof was Tythe?, which had been fe- queftred, and kept back from them in his PredecefTours dayesj and he gives this reafon , that they might be encouraged in the Law of the Lord, I fufpecl: neither Hez,ekja's Command or Example, or reafon, are of much force with you, who ra- ther defire the Minifters of England fhould be d'feouraged in the Law and Gofpcl of the Lord , by the taking away their portion of Tythes,fo that they might defcrt their work, and everyone fly to his field,as upon the fame caufe they did, Nehem.i-$.\o. have you had fome good hopes,and encou- ragements given you, of poiTcfTmg fome of them your felf? or elfe wherefore difcourage you the hearts of the people, from the paying of them ? well , though the AmaUkltes , Kites indeed, and Male-kjte s have fe fed upon much of the good sot the Church, and the linnen Ephodot David Sc burnt Ziglag ; yea,burntup many of the Synagogues of the Land, yet we will, and do with David, encourage our leives in the Lord, if not for a reftitution of what is loll and ruin'd , and rapiiVd away }yet for a prefervation of the portions of the Priefts and Levites , yet in hand : This of Hcz,ek'as caufeth me by the way to turn in, and make a little itay in tha' Texr, which is Numb. 18*26. and 31. where the Lord giveth the Tythes of the Ifraelites unto the Levites (or their inheritance; yejhall eat it, ye, and your houfoolds, for it is your reward for the fervice in the Tabernacle, in the 27^. Levit.^o. the Tythes of- the Land are called the Lords right , whether of the feed of the Land , or fruits of the Tree? 8CC. it is the Lords, it is holy unto the Lord* for the Earth is the Lords , and the fnlneiTe thereof: they are the Lords perpetual right, the which he T here i$6 Tythes net Leviticatl, but M or all. here aligned over to the Levites for a time, during their fer- vice at the Tabernacle? fo the affignement of them, and the Commandment for the payment of them, was but tempo- rary and conditional, as to them and their fervice. So that hence it appears, that Tythes were not now, and therefore never Levitical, or Ceremonial. That is fuch as were ordained wkh,and for the Levitical order ; but Tythes, being the Lords perpetual right were before the Levitical order fee up in ufe amongft the Saints ; yea, the very Hea- thens, and (hall be, as they have been,after that order taken down, and therefore more like to be moral. For though there was no law (written) concerning the paying of Tythes before the' time of Mofes. Written, I mean in Tables, or Books. There was a Law , (written in nature, and the vo- lumes of it ) which moved Abraham to pay Tythe. So that as reafon (upon the knowledge of the Creation of the world in fix dayes, and Gods reft in the feventh convinceth you, that one day in feven mult be a day of reft from your work-, affairs &; bufineftes,that you may imploy k in holy thoughts, prayers and praifes of God : So, for that the Number of ten is the uttermoft extent, limit, and bound of all Numbers, (it being pre-fuppoied that fomething is to be given to God out of that you do pofTelle the very light of nature will inform you, that you ought not to pafle the number of ten , but that one often (at the leaft,) is to be yielded unto God out of all that you pofleile, and that not the worft (for men do not lb deal with mortal Princes, laich the Propher, A^c/j/ i.S.j but the beft,firft,or principal, as it mould be, but that is not pleaded for : the which is further confirmed unto us, in that the Gentiles and people that knew not God , but onely by light of nature reafon, and fuch trad'tions as they had re- ceived from the Patriarks did all® pay Tythes ;and not one- ly fuch Gentiles as lived in forne places , &c among fuch peo- ple as were defcended of Abraham, or by leagues, or per- fwafions were induced by them to be Circumcifed, and be- come Profelytess but generally all Gentiles, rvomaues,Gre- cians , Barbariansjpaycd , vowed , and offered Tythes to their fuppofed Gods : fo that hence the prefcription ol Tythe may appear to be natural, rational, and from the beginning feated Tithes ]udkkll and political!. iyj feaced in the very light of nature $c reafon, and not onely fit- ted to a particular ftate,or people, as the Jews. If Tythes be Levitical and Ceremonial, then they are Types of fome- thing. I pray tell us of what ? Then they muft teach us,and kgnifie fomethings, as to Chrift, or his Kingdom ; (hew us what it is. Then they were ordained for the fervice of the Tabernacle,make that appear; yea,it appears,they were but affigned for it : Then they fhould laft but till the time of re- formation and coming of Chrift ; prove that; I have proved* they have been,and are retained in the Churches after thofe times, even untill thefe prefent times. Now therefore, Sir,either prove tithes to be Leviticall and Ceremonial], which you can never do; or grant them not tobefuch, as you muft needs do, and then leave oft' your charging the Church of England with fuch impiety> for re- taining of tithes ftiil, and appointing them for the mainte- nance of the Minifters without any word or warrant. But if not Ceremonially rior Leviticall, yet (you hope) I will not deny them Judiciall and Political! ; and then it will come all to one, for the Laws of that Common-wealth do not bind ours, or Others. I (hall croiTe your hope, and do de- ny Tithes to be f uch : For Tithes are facred and holy things taken from common ufe, and feparate from man, they are the Lords portion, a- 1 have (hewed before out of Levh.ij. But Judicials and Politicals are of things in common nfe, and not feparate from man. But upon fecond thoughts, and becaute advantage may arife to Tithes, and disadvantage to you and other Anti-tithe-men ; Let Tithes be granted parts of the Iudiciall and Political! Law; then we have ano- ther Law, more for Tithes, and fucha Law, asfometimes tied and obliged the Church, and never was yet voided and abrogated, that Politicall Law of Tithes; and therefore now (till is binding and obligatory. Tithes were no'part, not a (tone of the middle partition- wall, which the Apoftle faitb,Ep^/>.j 4. our Saviour Chrift hath pulled or broken down : For fir ft, they parted not be- twixt God and man, becaufe God appointed and comman- ded them to man, fo they difpleafe not God, and they plea- fed "man, though now excepted to, by f ome Iudges who T a feat 1 38 Tithes judicial! and politic all. fear not God, nor regard man : asalfoby Some lews, who have persecuted them and us, and they pleafe not God, and are contrary to all men. Neither fecondly, did the Politicall Law of Tithes make any. partition or wall betwixt lews and Gentiles : for the Gentiles alfo payed Tithes unto their Priefts, as due unto their Gods,fo called by them, (as their Auchours tell us) as well as the lews paid Tithes to theirs, as the right of- the true God, fo that in this matter there is union and con- junction, no difference and partition: no great gulf fixed here, between ^Abraham and Divesr lews or Gentile?, but that one might go over to the other in this way, and each to other give the right hand of fellowship. If then that Iudiciall and Politicall Law of tithes were no part of the middle wal of partition betwixt God and man,or betwixt man and man, (/.e.) lews Sc Gentiles,it is not broken down and abrogated, but (lands firm> and is {till obligatory, as a pofitivc command of God. Otherwife St. Paul^ whom we all hold for an excellent Difputant, and admirable Logi- cian, fhould not have proved himfelf (uch,whcn he,i Cor .9. argueth for Tithes out of Dent .1 8.1 . &;c. tor then he Should have fetched an argument from an abrogated Law,&; a bro- ken reed or wall,no way agreeing to the rule of right rcafon> which Paul wenzbyi though you feldom walk by any riil:s of reafoning, but that which is crooked and your own, as will appear anon in the point of Baptifm where onely yOu reafon, and are a Difputer ; for in other you do but Quxre, and are a Seeker. And for the other points cf the Iudiciall Law, (befides Tithes) (I fay fo only, becaufe I have proved in particular thefe not to be abrogated ) yea, for the whole Iudiciall Law, (and fo for Tithes) David (fure) accounts it as one of the choice and chief bkflings and benefits of that Nation, and that above other Nations ; Hefhewethhis judgements and ft a- ttttes unto Ifrael) he hath not dealt fo with any nation^ Pfah 147. 1 9, &: 2 o. And fo Mofes before him accounted ; What Na- tion is there fo great, that hath Statutes and judgements fo righteous Tfem .46. Now I cannot think, whatsoever you dp, .the Nation of England to be miferable and unhappy for that, Ucobs vow of f tying Tithes m mll-mrjhip9 i $? thar, or in that, for which, and ill which, the Nation of the lews were bleifed and happy : nor do I beleeve, that Chrifl: Ief us, the Fountain and Spring of all bleflings, would at his coming, and by his dying, deprive our Nation,or any other, of any blefling. But 1 return now into my road again, wherein you put me, that is, of examples, and thofe of the old Teltament* for thither I am come, and of the primitive Chriftians there, for I prcmifed to fhew you how it was from the beginning : and this I (hall beft find in Genefis, the firft book, and the be- ginning of Scripture, which telsin the firft word theteof,how it was, In the beginning* I (hall begin with Jacob9zhe third Patriarch) and Father of the Faithfull, as being next in my way ; who? after Gods gracious promife unto him, and hi> divine vil'ion in that place, (which thereupon he called Be- thel, (/>.) the houle of God) vowed a vow y fay ingulf God will be •with me^and keep me in this way that J go^and will give rue bread. to eat9 & raiment to put on^fo that I come again to my fathers hoafe in peaceythenfhall the Lord be my God^and this ft one which I have fet for a pillar , (hall be Gods hottfe, and of all thou fhalt give me^ J will fir 'ely give the tenth to theey Gen. 28. 20, &CC. What think you of this example? Was it a will-Wor- (hip in Jacob ? Then furely God would have difavowed and difallowed, what Jacob vowed and allowed : But there is here nothing to the contrary, but that God al- lowed and accepted of it, and therefore it was Jacobs wor- Ihip according to the will of God, Yca.,Iacob did it,kaow- ing the will of God, and relying upon it, as may appear from an implyed precept, and exprcfled reafon he went upon, when he entered into his vow ; which is categorically and pofitively thus much, however h ypothetically and condi- tionally delivered. To whomfoever the Lord (hall perform the fame things, that here are done to lacob^ he is tied and bound up unto the Lord, by the fame Law or precept that Iacob was, and if it were not thus, all would be uncertain, whereas thus refolved, there appears a Preceptor Law, (an obligation or light of Nature in lacob to pay tithes unto the Lord : J a consequent or performance, (an execution there- of, or vow to do it,) a reafoa or motive, f the protection and. T 3 blefling , 1 40 Tithes morall and divine. blefling ot him by God J I fhould have {ec down thisfirft. (Even hence you may fee, that tithes were long before the Ceremoniall Law, and were part of the Morall Law and light of Nature, and that the opinion of the godly firft fa- thers was, that they were due, and belonged to God, and this was their devotion and praftice to give them ; both fa- ther Jacobs, and his Grand-father ^£r^w.f, and therefore tithes may be called, as to their originall, not Leviticall or Pertonall, but rather Naturall, as I may fay, I mean,Morall and Divine, not Ceremoniall and Humane.; But to pro- ceed. As Jacob here vowed to pay his tithes upon the rea- fon (you heard) GodsbleiTing of all his fubftance; fomay others upon the like reafon vow, if they will, but muit pay, whether they vow or no. For the reafon here given, as to the paying of tithes, isgenerall and perpetual!, fas to the vowing of the paying them, there mult be added to the rea- {on,a grain or two ol Religion,)and fo being circumlcribcd to no time, place, or perfon,let me tell you thus much in your ear again, (Sir) from this Text (before I leave it,) that if you acknowledge you have received all thefe bleffi. -gs from God, which Jacob mentioneth here, and enjoyed after, this Law and Precept ot paying your tithes liethclofe and fait upon you : if God Hull be with you and keep you in your way, if he ihall give you bread to eat, and raiment to put on,8cc. as he did Jacob ; and Gods thus blcfiliig of Jacob, were a good and full reafon for Jacobs vow ol paying his tithe?, then you alfo ought to do the fame, and torcfolve to do it, having the fame reafon that he had, which is fo rea- fonable, that it belongs to all, as well as to Jacob ; and where the reafon of doing a thing bclongeth to all, there the doing of that thing belongeth to all, I am now fo inured and accuftomed to Quaeres from you, that I cannot palTe this wow of tithes in Jacob without a Quaere or two : and I will fuppofe them to come from you, the great Quaker or Matter of Quakes. Firft, if Tithes were morall, how could, what need Jacob vow the giving of them ? Anf, Morall things may be vowed, therefore Iacob vowed) the Lord (hall be my God) vcrf.zi. See 2 £7w»ti7,i2. and 14. Pfal,i 19,106, King A [a with Jndah Of Abrahams paying tithe to Melchifedck. 141 Jttdah and many of //r^/perfwaded thereto by the Prophet, A^anah took an oath and folemn covenant to feek and ferve the Lord. David faith, I have fvvorn , and will per- form it, that I will keep thy righteous judgement*. And Iacob did fo, that he might give them his tithes, the more exactly and zealouily, being now doubly bound,by duty and vow too. Secondly, but why then doth he vow them conditionally, when as morall things fhould be vowed abfolutely ? Anf„ E- ven morall things maybe vowed conditionally, as to ho- nour our Parents , if God will prolong their lifes : Iacob could not ocherwife vow the paying of tithes, but conditi- onally, if God blefled his fubftance : For where any are de- prived of their increafe, they are free from tithes. Thirdly, but is not this to offer unto the Lord of that which colt Iacob nothing, and to pay God in his own coyn> to vow or to give tithes unto the Lord, which are the Lords before ? Anf, So is obedience, fear, love, and the reft, they are the Lords; yet lacob vowed them unto the Lord, when he vowed, the Lord ihall be my God, and this place? his houfe (which Was his before,) (*.) that he would love, and fear, and obey God, and give unto him his obedience, fear, and love. Fourthly,to whom did Iacob pay his vowed tithe$M»/.To the Prieft of the mod high God>as Abraham his grandfather did: for whereas Sacrifices were immediately given to God, tithes were given to God mediately ,(*.) to God in his Priefts. Iacob here joyning his vowed tithes Sc Gods houfe together, did appropriate them to the houfe of God,the temple, where God fhould be worfhipped : Though itbe not particularly fct down byname to what Prieft, as it is in Abrahams tithes, yet we mull conceive, that he paid them to fome Prieft of God,after the example of Abraham, To which I now come, as the- laft in my dilcourfe, but the fir ft Tit her in Scripture mentioned. The Scripture is the 14. of Cjer.ef, 1 9, and 20, JMelchifedekMing of Salem brought ferth bread and wine : and he vp as the Prieft of the mo ft hi ah God, zAnd he bleffed him^and faidy Bleffed be Abraham of the mo ft high God, foffeffour of Heaven And earthy and bleffed be the mo ft High7 which hath delivered thine. 142 Tythes not onelj offpjles. th'me enemtes into thine hands, *And he (i, Abraham) gave him tithes of all, I (hall firit clear my way, before I preile it, or Walk in it my felf, or lay it open for others to trace it. Was not Abra» hams family the Church or God ? and out of it, what Pried was there to pay tithe unto, but the Priefts of Idol-gods ? Yes, God had ofold, even amongft the Heathen', not only cleft Saints and Worfhippers of him, but even Priefts and Miniftcrsinholy things, who taught the religion and fear ot God ; as here Melchifedek^thc Prieft of God in Salem,and elfe where lethroxhe Prieft in Midian, although the ordinary feat and place of the Church was in the family of the Pa- triarch, and amongft the people ollfrael. But Melchifedek*. being both King and Pried , might not thele Tythes be paid unto him as King ? No, for the paying of them is annexed, not to his fettmg forth of the Collation, or Banquet, which was Royal • but to his giving of the Be- nediction and bleffmg, which was Sacerdotal : fo that the Apoftle from it, the iythe-giving,doth aflert andinferre, Heb.~l.not any Kingdom, but the Prieft-hood of both Mel- chifedek^and Chrift. True indeed 5that the Lord as King and Monarch of all the world, and of all mens eftates there- in hath callenged and refervedunto himfelf a tenth thereof to difpofe of, ( as 1 hinted before) but he hath difpofled , $c afligned them not to his Kings of the ear th,but to his Priefts in the Church ,and fo not to the Tribe offadahy but of Levi, But I return to Abrahams paying Tythes to Melchifedek^ the Prieft, Hebr. 7. 4. Abraham paid Tythes of the fpoy les, you will fay, and fo will you do; when you have gotten a great vidtory, you will give the Mini fter of the place a portion of Tythes out of the fpoyles : It is well fpoken? Sc fo it is well ta- ken, that you will pay the Tythe of any things at any time, in any place* upon any occasion to the Minister: fo fumetimes, and fomewhere ,and upon fome occafion you can, and will do a luperftitioufly unlawfull tb inland a morally evil act (according to your Tenet) Iconfefle, I queftion much whe- ther Abrahams Tythes were all of the fpoy les, bccauLc though in the fourth verf. the Author to the Hebrews faith, he gave the tenth of the fpoyles? yet verf, 2. he faith, Abraham gave a tenth Tythes not onely offfOjles. ^ 143 tenth pare of all , and fo it is in Gen. 1 4. 20. (whence the Au- thor took his word-) he gave him Tythes of all. And I qucltion this the rather.bec- ule dhraham^icti.2^. when the King of Sodom defired of Abraham the perfons tccovercd, and would have Abraham to keep the goods to himfelf, he tells him, that he had lifted np his hands unto God fin an Oath, or Vow) that he would not take any thing from a thread t o a fhoo-latchet, leaft he (houkTfay , I have made Abraham rich : And befides, the word in the Original Greek, doth pro- * perly, and natively fignifie no more, but the chiefcft and primelt things s but ot what, that's not expreffed in, or by the word. But I believe, our learned Translators had realon enough to render it, Tythes (of the fpoyies) and can eafily anfwer what hath been but queftioncd by me, and therefore let it be granted, that Abraham gave Tythe of the fpoyies , it prejudiced! not the caufe in hand , they all now, were his goods and polleflion by conqueft. And 1 iuferre hence,that therefore much more, he paid Tythes of his own other goods and poiTeflions, whicn ( no qucftion) he had there, and car- ried up along with him , when he went to purf ue thofe four Kings,and fo he gave the Tythe of ail, (/'.?.) both of that he carried with him, and of that he won from them. For fure, if no other Tythes had been given by Abraham to Melch';[edek^t but onely oi the fpoyies, the Authour to the Hebrews would not have fpok:n fo much of it, and inflfted fo * long upon it, neither fhould Abrahams liberality , (or equity rather)beenfo eminent,neither could there have been drawn io weighty an argument from it as is in the 6. 8. ^# verfes of that Chapter, or (probably) Abraham ramming to Hebron might the next day fit appear;, he dwelt nigh to Salem) fend unto Melchifedtkjhe. Tythe of Irs goods at horn?, and fothen, he gave him the Tythe of all, according to the very letter and words. And fo might continue, doing the fame yearly,as may be thought, for would the Apoffle there {peak fo much, and in fuch a high manner, of one onely a£tion,un- klle it (hewed, the common uie and practifc, how Tythes were paid then , as afterwards they were to the Levies i And befides, the Pricfts before the Law, were as well to be ho- noured and fuccoured yearly by Tythes, as the other under, " V and 1 44 Abrahams Tytbes $f tight dm to Mclcbifedek. and after the Law: And againjthe firft Saints and people had as much reafon and Obligation to (hew their yearly gratitude and obedience unto God , by honouring God with their fubftance that way, as they that followed long after. Butjthc Scripture being filent here, I affirms not peremp- torily, but oneiy probably , telling you again (as formerly,) that: thefe rtungsbcing matters of fa£t, you cannot argue ne- £at-'.vely,or to a denial of them, hence, and upon this ground j becaufe there is nothing mentioned, or affirmed of them in Scripture. This is moft certain and evident , that Abraham paid Tyzhesio Melchifedek^y and is much commended therein by the A poftlcj and therefore it was no will-worfhip, neither m him as not in Jacobmov was it a piece of Ceremonial and Le- virical fervice; for in that, Levi received Tythes of Abra- hams posterity but here Levi paidTythes in theloynes of Abraham : nor was it of Abrahams good Will and -benevo- lence ; then the Apoftle had not dealt fo well with the He- brewst n comparing the Levites with Melchifedel^; for they were far beyond him herein, as, who had a commandment for their Tychcs, whereas he had nothing to (hew for his Tythes, but Abrahams benevolence. Sir, be fare to mark- this, and it you can make it good that Abraham paid CMel- chifedekJTyihQS out of benevolence, you may foon down with our rights and dues , and quickly up, with your benevo- lences and pcnfions ; or bring us to hold our Titles in Com- ■mendam, or at the Will of Six John and Madam jhz Lord and Lady of the Mannour; yea, at the plcaiure of John and }oa»ey the Tenants and Farmers. But you will hardly ever do it : for I have another argu- ment un-anfwerable, if Abrahams Tythes had been but his benevolence, & gratuital favour to CALelchifedek^* this would never have proved CMelchifedekjco be;how great a rain ? far greater then Abraham ; for a Superiour may do a fpontane- cus favour, and an ultroneous honour, if he will, to his inte- 1 iour h doth he thereby exalt h im above himf elf ? I have fent you fifty fheets of Paper for your two, (fo Ifearlmall) as a gratuital a£t, and free favour to you^ I do not hereby gra- cifie you as a Superiour above my(elf,bucgracifie youoncly asaninferiour. No, \ At rahams Tithes of right dm to CMclchifedck. 145 No, no, Abraham in giving Ty the of all to Uttelchifede^ gave him but his due and right, and he gave it , not becaufe he would, but becaufe he ought, (yet Abraham would alfo do what he ought to do.) Abrahams Tythes were due to UWelchlfedt^ by right , and what right ? Of CMelchifedekj benediction, and bleffing A- braham (it's but a vain thought here interpoled by thofe that lay, they were due, and paid, by a right of Sacrifice. For fo long (and no longer) than heierved at the Tabernacle and Al- tar, which now being taken down, and broken down; as the partition wall, by the coming of Chrift/hat true Lamb and iubftance of all fliadowes and facrifices,the Levitical Priei;s have no further right in themfelves to Tythe , nor can any derive a Title to them, from them, and their Miniftery , or fervicc. What then became of them after? upon the expiration of the time they were afligned, and fet over , and upon the cciFation of the Levitical Prieft-hood, they returned back in- to the hands of God that gave them,the firft donour Sc pro- prietor^! the courfe of right: though they be ceafed to Levi, as for the fruit and benefit, they are not ceafed to the Lord as to the right and propriety ; the right that God hath to every mans goods and fubftance is never loll to him, but he ftill Net to Kings and temporal Govtrnours, 1 47 ftill hath re, and difpofeth of it as him pleafeth, and this right of his he ftill lets out under the name of Tyches, or the tenth of the increafe, who bed: knoweth how to call his own right and portion, and how to meafure apd proportion it. 1 fay, he (till difpofeth of them ; for he neither needeth them now no more than b:fo re, that, hefhould keep them m his own hands now under the New Teftament , more than he did under the Oii. No, he hath fervants in fpecial to bellow them upon,now as Well as then, even the Saints that are upon the earth, and the excellent in whpmis all his delight, as David be (iowed his goods, Pfil.i 6,2. but who are they ftill ? There is a great Schollcr and Minifter too, in pint, who affirmcth ,that the Levitical Prieft-hood ceafmg, and fo Ty thes returning unto the Lord as his portion , which he as Monarch of all laid claim to in the Old Teftament, he hath nowexprefly religned the right of them unto Kiugs, for which he cites, 1 Sam, 8,1 1 . and 1 7, &s alfo %?m.\ 3.6. Firfr, It's too indefinitely Sandiltin&ly (poken of a Schol- ler,to fay, the right of Ty thes is given them of God,and no more. For firfi, the right of portion, or propriety is ever in God, and God onely : it is the Lords portion for ever , and it is his glory to have it, and he will not. give his glory to another : 1. The right of the bench:,- or fruition is not given away to Kings ; if it be 3. but aright of order and difpoiition, that I qucftion not : it is the fecond, and middle right,is theQue- ition. Secondly, It's impertinently, and unfeafonably cited,that oi Samuel : for then the Levitical Prieft-hood was in its full vigour ; and in the mid- way, imcySamu-l thought not then of the ceafing and ending 01 it : Samuel himfelf was then the Prieftof the Lord, and upright, and unblameablc ,and lived upon the Tythes, there was no caufe, that he fliould Jpea^ fuch aword againft his own V-fe, as AAoniah^ I King. *. 3. and at fuch a time mould Prophecy, of the Ccflation of Tythes to the Priefts,and the Donation of them to Kings. Thirdly , Samuel (to dchori them from their refolution aboutthechooiingor a King? and entring upon that new Government) tells them, not, what (hall be the right > and V S the 1 48 Tithes not Jfsigned to temporal Governors, the Law, but whac Will be the manner, and the cuftome of their King, to take the tenth of the feed and fheep , (which were the PiieftsJ it Giould be rather their fafhion, than Gods constitution : and a depraved fafhion, the manner of a King, but withall tyrannical, which is there delineated. Fourthly , Samuel tells them , what (in prefent the Leviti- cal Pueft-hood {landing, and to ftand along timejtheir new King, and next Kings would prefume and ufurp to them- ieives} he doth not foretell them , what after many nun* dreds of years >Other Kings and thofp none of Judah (hould, and would do, after the. Levitical Prieft-hood ceafing and abrogated. And for the other out of the Romans, for this caufepay you Tribute alfo,for they are Gods Mini ft ers9att ending continually up- on this very thing. The Apoftle fpeaks onely of, and means Political and Temporal Tributes as due to the civil Minifter of God, the Magiftrate, attending upon this very thing, the bearing up the fword of Juftice, and executing the Law, the Church of England , and the Minifters thereof, have ever been, and are ever ready to render unto them Tribute to whom Tribute is due. But the Apoftle neither (peaks, nor means of that (acred and Divine Tribute of Tythes,and other Revenues devoted to, and fet apart for Holy ufes , and due to the Ecclefiaftick Minifters of God, attending upon this very thing the bearing the fword> ot the (pirir, the word,and difpenhng the Gofpel; To the which as our former Kings never did , fo our prefenc Governour doth not fo much as pretend a Title. This rather is marvellous in my eyes, to read (uch a paf- fageof an Englifh Minifter, amongft u?, printed this very year (That the Tithes are no mans own , but the Mini- fters. Many hundred yea rs,fince the Parliament of England did fet apart the Tithe- for the maintenance of theMiniltery; and the (upream Magiftrate is but the Feoffee in truft, to fee that what the people of England in their Rcprcfentative had giyen to the Miniftery to be duly paid them.) The which I take to be written Politically, rather than Theologically, more like a Statefman(if not Common wealths man) I would fay Common peoples man, than a Church man: For I have largely Tithes Aj signed to Himftrs of the G off el. \ 4.9 largely fhewed,that Tithes have been fet apart for the main- tenance of Gods Minifters> fomethoufand years before his many hundred years fince the Parliament of England did !t» &c that long before there was either Parliament, or England, and by a higher power than the Parliameot of England, the Supream power of Chrift and God, who refervhg them, the Tithes as His portion, hath aftigned them to his Priefts and Minifters.In this he faith well,that the Supream Magiftrate is as a Feoffee in truft, to fee that what the Pari, hath orrdered ( not given ) fell, the tithes to the Minifters be duly paid them, and it he had added that the Parliament alfois but a Feoffee in truft, to fee, that what God and Cnrift have given (and alfo ordered)/^/, the Tithes to his Minitfers, Ihould be duly fet out for them;he had faid more fully welhBut to leave theTithes of the Minifters in thehandsof the Parliament, which is but the peoples Repielentative, to fet out (as fole- ly and juftly in their power) this is Vox pepttliy tofpeakas people do» and as they would have it. Yea it is to turn Quaker in this point, and implieth? that if the people have the foleand originall power to fet them our, theTithes to Minifters ; then it is in their Right and power alfo, to fee the Minifters bef ides them, and to take thefe away from them h and fo, though they be no mans own, as he faith, no mans in particular ; yet they fhall be thus, the peoples own, ;he peoples in generall to difpofe of: and what i^this, but Quaking againft ftablifhing : or making our title to Tithes more lame and and infirm, more quaking and unftable,than indeed they are. Now if upon the ceafing of the Leviticall Priefthood by Chrift scoming,God did not affign over his Portion of Tithes io the Kings]and Magiftrates, his Vice-gerents upon earth, why then in all probability, he hath difpofed of them ftill to Priefts and Minifters, his Vicars and Subftitutes in the Church ; I mean the Minifters of theGofpel. Yea, feeing Tithes were no part of Leyiticall inftituiions, nor things of Ceremony, as I have fhewed, what had Aaron or Levi to do, having acled their parts, and going off theftage, to (weep away and carry off with them, any more than types and figures, rites and ceremonies ? True, God at the coming of Chrift 1 5 o Tjthes afsigned U Minifters ef the Gofpel. Girift into the the world > abolilhed thcfe; but fprthofe, he onely called and took in his alignment of them trom the Le- viticall and Aaronkall Pricfthood, tobeftow upon another elfcwhcre,but ftill a pricftho3d and Minillery. More plain- ly;God, being goodnelle it feir9and moil good to his Church, {till now under the Goipel, keepeth not his portion of Tithes in his own hands, when they came into them (wbatneed- eth he them ? J but hath renewed the alignment of them, and communicated them unto the Minifters of Chrift under the Goipel, who need them , That (o , they that preach the Gofpel, fhould live of the Goipel, as they whoierved at the Temple and Altar lived of the Temple and Altar, that is by the Tithes, &c. And was it not Gods conftant courfe, ever fince he claim- ed his portion of Tithe, f which was ever from the begin- ning to aflign them over to his Priefts and Minifters ; (hew me where ever he dig elled from this old and ancient cu- ftome of his, either this way, or that way, or any o; her Way 10 dilpofe of them, or any where elie, fromfirftco laft through the whole old Tcftament, than to his Priefts and Minifters,- and why not then to his Evangelicall Mini- fters of the new, aS well as his Legal! Minifters of the old Law ? feeing he is a God, and changeth not in his affe&ioa, His ML. -liters be luved from the beginning, and he will love them unto the end ; yea Cure, Gods love and refpect to the Mi- nifter ;of the Gofp-1 is far greater than it was to the Priefts of the Law, as their Mi/iiftcry is far better and more glori- ' ous than the others; a^ fcrving a better altar, and officiating ab >Lit a move glo. ions Tabernacle. And therefore lure God having now under the Gofpekbe portion ot the fame Tithes ftill, which he had under the Law, and which he likewise will have for ever unto the end, bath given unto the Mini- fters of the Goipel the ufc and benefit of them (as to the Minifters of thc'Law)(keeping the Right IcatecS ftill in him- himfeif) and hath not turned them into the wide world, and Church at large, leaving them to the courtcfie of Kingsy or referring them to the benevolences of people. Yea the Minifters of the Golptl have yet another good Plea, Title, and Tenure to them the faid Tithes in Chrift, who LMinifltrs in Chrifts ft ead Refuted to receive Tithes, 151 who though by his corning abolifhed the Levitical], yetefta- blifned the Mclchifedekian Priefthood : For (o the Author *o the Hebrews affirmethit, and rcferreth to Pfalm no. 4. where its certified upon oath, no leiXe than of the Lord, The Lord hath ftvorn, and will not repent, thou art a Prieftfor ever^ifter the order of Melchifedcck«So you fee then,tlut how- ever Levi his Priefthood is ccafed,and fo his Law,or right of tithes isceafed ; Mekhifedeck^s Priefthood i> not changediaiid therefore his Law and right of 1 ithes is not changed , accor- ding to that rule or axioms in the i^.of Heb.-j .The Trieflhood being changed, there is made of ncceffitj ach-wge alfo^of thi Law,\s in Levi, and to of the other lidc> the Piicftdoxl not being changed, there is not made of necefsity any; change of the Law, as in \AelchiJedek. Chrift therefore having on him the lame Priefthood, that Melchifedckhzdy hath alfo the fame Law tor theTithes.that he had, and as Abraham the father of the faithfull,paid them of due and right to Melchifed\, fo are they now to be paid of due and right to Chrift: yea much more, for a greater than Azelchifedtk. is here,evcn Chrift ,the antitype, and there- fore greater than the type, Mdchifedek^ He may more juftly claim that due honour to be done unto him, &c right to be gi- ven him of all Abrahams children, and this one there afTcrted, That he fhoMld receive Tithe, of whom it tswitneffed, that he 6- w/?,Hcb.7.8.and that cver,and never dieth,of whom Melchi- fedek^ alfo was a type, in thai neither his beginning of d.iycs, nor end ot life are mentioned or recorded in Scripture. Eut what's this to the Ministers of the Gofpei, and their Right to Tithes? Why, the Right ro the Tithe*, is be- come Chrifts ; and is this nothing to the Miniftcrs ol Chrift? The M nifters of Chrift, are reprcfentatively, ministerially, deovtatively, Chrift himfelf, ot in Chrifts ft ;ad, as the A- poftle faith, I Cor. I $,29. Even as the Embaffadottrs of Kings, are Kings themfehes, and in their ftead. Doth he not fay fo, of them h'mfelf, Math, 10.40. He that rece'iveth yon receiveth wet accounting them himfeif? as in matters of charitable Alms given to the poor members of Gftift. Chriftfaith, / was an hungry and y e gave me meat, and it being queftioned, When faw we thee an hungry and fed thee ? He anfwereth) Veri- X // 1 5 2 Mini f ten infhrifts ftead deputed U receive Tyhes. ly, J fay unto you, inasmuch as you have done it unto one of the lea fir of thefe my brethren, ye have done it unto me, Math.2. 5,40. If a member of Chrift , though he be no miniftcr, be as Chrift himfelf; then much more the minifter of Chrift,who alio is a member of Chrift, is much more Chr ft himfeif, in the manner above fpecified:S£ therefore I may fay truly alio, according to the former Evangelical proportion, in as much, as you pay Tithes unto the leaft of Chrifts minifters, you do it unto him, who is thus honoured in his minifters, thus ho- noured, like as fo relieved in his members, fo relieved. True, there is not in the Gofpel any exprefte claim of Tithes and difpofition of them to minifters of the Golpel, by name, made by Chrift, (as there was of the fame, to the Levites in the Law) and that becaufe (perhaps the Le- viticall Law was then and yet in fome manner (landing? and fbthe former aflignation of Tithes not yetfully determined, yet he taught fomewhat of the Do&rine and matter of Tithes, as I (hewed out of Matthew, and though no body came up to the fame in particular pra&ife, that we read of, yet divers mirifired unto Chrifi of their fub fiance, Luke 8,5, which he accepted of for the prefent, . but after (pake more roundly to the people of his Apoftles maintenance, The la- bourer is -worthy of his hire • the hire of labourers is a fettled allowance throughout the year? ten pence or twelve pence a day, and (lands not to pleature of thofe they work for, what they will give or allow. But now it is confiderable further, ■ by what Right, or for whatcauCe Melchifedeksock theTithes, and Abraham $z\d themhvhy,it was becaufe of, and by the right of hisblefling Abraham, (or fo they are immediately con)ayned,A4elchifedek^ bleifed Abraham-, and Abraham gave him Tithe of all : and therefore upon this ground and rcfpc£r, the Tithes are due &c tobc paid to Chrift Jefu , the fountainof all bleffing, from whom, and through whom all are bleffed, himfelt blefTed for evcr.Andfoalfo is it not equity and juft, that the minifters of Chrift,who are fent of Chrift to blc(Tc,and do bleiTe people in the name and perfon of Chr ft, fhould alfo? as in his name and perfon,rcccive the Tithed for this alfo m> ft be conceived, r.hat the nlctlingof Me/ch.fedt\, was alio a humane bkfling, and ofbenediftion and Minifters t lefsing the people. 153 -and benedi&ion, and that in t he name and perfon of Chrift; and thereupon received the Tithe. Now that God hath given unco minifters power to blefle in the name of God, appears as fiomMetcb'fedekbkiimgoi Abraham, fo from divers other places in the old Teftament, which I will but name for brevity lake, Dmt% 10.8. 1 Chron. -3»*3.2 Chrt$o.$7.'DeHt. ij.i2.1 Sam.9.i3.Jof.%.M.l\ndycz I muft here write a little more diftinftly left under the name and Title of b letting, others as well as minifters m«y come in for Tithes : It muft be fuch a blefling a? Melchifidekjhc Prieftof themoft high God blelTed^^^w, and the mini- fters of the moft high Son of God , do bieile the people with. For There is a blefling, which is onely a praying for one ano- ther, and a wilhing well to them. Thus To i fent Joramhhfi* tobleffe'Ddvidy 2 Sam. 8.10. Thus Parents blelTc their chil- dren, and children are taught to ask their Parent ; blefling, and they are better fed than taught, that do it not, or refufe it. And thus blefTe them that cmie ycu, pray for them, &c. This isgenerall blefling : There are particulars. There is a blefling ot another, which is a foretelling of bleflings in particular to come upon them, thus Jfaac blefted Jacob and Efau^ Gen.27. 28. and fo Jacob bleffed the twelve Patriarks,(7^«49. this is propheticall blefling. There is a blefling ot others, whichisana&uallbeftowing and conferring of the lame good things, the other did but foretell or pray for,' thu;!'^ 24. jo. our Saviour Chrift led forth his Apoftlesy as far as Bethany , and he lift up his hands and ble/fedthem. This is reall and divine blefling. Minifters pretend not tothefe two laft forts of bleflings, who neither have viuon to foretell, nor power to confer, blefling,and for the firft, it belongeth no more to them than others, not to them peculiarly as minifters. There is there- fore a blefling of others, which is a pronouncing of blefling, a publick authoritative blefling, in the name and perfon of Chrift according to the word, and this is minifteriall, the ' ordinary and peculiar duty of the minifters. (The other the firft of them is but private andcharitative, the fecond pro- X * pheticall 154 OfBttifdi&iM and Ministers blefsing the pople. pheticall, and the third DivineJ thus its laid in the i oth 0f Dent. 8. before alleadged, the Lord (eparated the Tribe of Levi to (land before him, and to minifter unto him, and to blefle in his name un:o this day. And the power and very form of bklliug is let down , Numb. 6,2^ton this wife, Aaro i and his Sbas jh.M bLffe the (fhildren o/Krae], faying unto them, the L-:rd blejfe the: a;:dkeepthee,tbe Lord make his face to fh'ne upon thee and be gr actons unto theet the Lord lift up his counte- nance uf/pt thee end give thee peace ^and they jhaliput my name up- on the ( hilar, n of iuviel , and I will blejfe them : And thus Mel- chijedi k> leile i Abraham ; and thus alio, Cnrift being a Pricft alter i. e order of Meichijedek^bkffcd his Apuftles 5 and thus the Minifteis of the Gofpd, being Priefts after the order of Chnfr, (yea? at thefecond hand, and inainferiour manner next after, and in Chrift, after the order of Melchifedekf) do bkile the r people. And it there had not been fomething in it, as or accepta- tion to God, (o of edification to the people, it would not have been fo otren inculcated as before, nor fo emphatically ipo- ken of, as 2 (fhi on, 3 o. 27. The Prlefls arofe and bleffed the peo- ple, and the. r vo.'ce wai heajd^ and their prayer came up to his dwel» ling place even unto Heaven : Therefore f think people do ve- ry ill, as againft good order and example* d againft their own good and benefit, to depart cue of the Church, and from the Congregation, as toon as the Sermon is ended,before the prayer tor a blcifing upon the word heard be made, or before the word of bkfling upon the people be pronounced in prayer. I mean that dflfaiflory bklTiag, of, bUjfe d are they that hear the word and keep it^and the grace of our Lordfefm Chrift be with you alt> or fuch like : They did nor fo, 1 Qit%\ 6, 42. They departed every man to his houfebut before at the 2. verf they received firrf the bkfling from David, If thou wile be a true Ifrmdkt at lafr, after thou haft been wtaftiing with God in hearing the word and prayer, let not thy God gfj, or hi- Angel, except he blefle thce5 and depart not thou> tilt thou hall: received the bklTtng alio, the dimilTory bkfling from the mouth of Gods M.nifter. If otherwise, it is as if in thy Landlords houfe thou fhouldeft r (2 up as foon as Dinner iscnded,and go thy wayes out ot the gucltCham'jcr before he Of B enedittion and Mini firs bkfsing l hi people. 155 he had faid grace after meat, (as we (peak) or given thanks to God on thy behalf as othet , and Co difmiiied all vyith fuch a blcfll ig and benediction. The people did not eat till &*/»# and may be learned our of Nxm.6.2^,&cc.Romj 5.1 3. and 16.25. Att.i.o.12. iOr.16,25, 2C?r.i2.l4. lThcf,5,2l.2Tkef,2m 1 <5.and 17. Heb.13. ao. 1 Pet. 5. 10. Jnde2^. And do hope that by reafon,d°c- I will add one way of blefling more, which I dare call m?- niftenal and facerdotal,.pcculiarly belonging to the Mini- tiers of the Ciolpel, and that is, the confecraring and fepa- rating, and faiiitityingofbreadaud wine to a Sacramental utc by the word and prayers and other Sacramental actions carried cm according to the inftuution of Chrift :Thus our Swiout Chr ft bieiled,.^/*^ 14.22. and thus the Apoftle faith, the Cud oj blejfmg, which we bleffed^ §£C. I Ccr.l o.1 6, and thus alto we bk tie the ta me. To 1^6 of Itntditt'ton and Minister t blefsing thefecfle. To (hut up this : weblerTeour people;yea,we arc ready to bldle yon alfo Sir>and thofe thac perfecute us,ble(Te 1 fay , and not curie, and that not onely publikely from Mount Gerifmy when we are over you in the Pulpit ; but when we go by you, we (hall fay, the blejfing of the Lord be upon yottywe bleffeyou m the name of the Lord^ Plal. 129-8. and do hope that by reaion of this our minilterial bleffing of you,and our people , we (hall have our Tythcs the more willingly paid us, without any forcing and fuing of them, as with a good confeience we may ; whatfoever you fuggeft to the contrary. And fo I have done with the fpecial matters of knowledge and information for you about' the maintenance of Mini- fters ; as for that you add, (in your Quaere) it is but your fin* gular manner of (launder, and calumniation of me, by which (moft an end) you maintain your felf and your Tenets : of mc (I fay) and my people too) for you write of my forcing maintenance from thole that are not willing to pay it, it go- ing againft tbeir conlcience , and fuing them at the Law to recover them, (words worthy to be twice written out by me, or rather not to be once named amongfl Chriftians , as which are intended by you,to make breaches and diffentions 'c wixt minifters and their people.) I (hall fir ft vindicate my people. I hear no fuch matter (but from you) that they are not willing to pay ; Yea, as Sz.Paul once boafted of the Qonn- thians their readineffe and forwardnclte in the getting up their Colle6tion,forthe Saints in Hierufalem , and prelTed their example upon the Macedonians to haften up them ; fo I do joy in my people their willingnefle and cheerfulnelfe in the paying of their tenth unto their mimfter; and I do urge their Precedent unto you, to quicken you up, to do the like to your minifter: I rather fufpett, you are not willing fome of them (hould be willing to pay me ; and (as the Apoftle in an- other cafe) I fear, lealt by fome means, as the Serpent be- guiled Eve through his fubtilty , fo fome of their mindes, fome, or other, Eve*sy (for you are a creeper into houfes, and a leader-captive of filly 5 women) have been, &: are corrupted by you from the fimplicicy, and willingneffe that was , and fhould be in them, through your hiffings $c inftnuations, and fo People may , and ought to be willing to fay Tythes. 1 5 7 fothcn it's more your fault then it is theirs, as the other was more the Serpents fin, than Eves, And I fay no more unto you, but this : be wife as the Serpent, but wkhall be harme- Idle as the Dove. But for the moft pait of my people , I bear them record, they are willing to pay their Dues : whether in pretence , or in truthr. Tythcsare paid (at leaft) the great ones,and there- in I do rejoyce, and will rejoyce for their willingneftb. And why fhould they not be willing ? I willingly fowe un- to them fpiritual things is it fuch a great thing, if I (hall reap their carnal things ? they may be willing to fo good an ex- change, the eternal good of their Souls, if they value ic , as I know fome of them do> for their bodily and temporall goods. Yea, and therefore more willing to pay their Tythes to Ministers for their maintenance, who preach to them the glad tidings of fal vat ion, and do amongft them the good. deeds of Charity (befides other Legal Right to them, and perfonal Merit in themfelves) than to be forced to pay the fame untoTythe-publicanes and Tol-gatherers , for other purpofes and projects, they know not what ; or to be raifed by their Landlords,to to much more Rent annual , as they come to, and themfelves, the people I mean , ne'r a whit the better, cither in Soul, or body for it. Again,people may be very well willing to pay their Tythes, feeing therein nothing is taken from them,bnt it is given of God,and allowed from other to nodamage,or difad vantage of theirs , but onely of fome work and labour , in liew of which, they have as much* and more of their Minifters : the » Husband -man plowcs,and then^armer fowes,£#r Godglveth the increafe ; out of which,he refervetfrthe tenth as his fort -on holytohimfelf, and to his more immediate fervants the Mi- niftei s, which is not difpofed by God to the Landlord,nor by the Landlord rented to the Tenant: fo that howfoever fome might be unwilling to pay the Minifter out of their own, yet (I fuppofe) all are willing, that God and their Landlord (hall pay the Minifter, and themfelves onely as both their Subfti- tutes and Affignes, to fee, that the Minifter be paid his dues ouc of goods referved, portion , and the Landlords abated Rent. Laft- 1 5 8 Paying Tithe not Againft confcience , rightly informed. Laftly,they may be wiling to it as the far eafier way,and faving them much trouble: foitis>to leave m the field the tenth theafe • but to get up the tenth (hilling compoficion , or any Money-contribution, how hardly, and with what a do it is done, (witnefTe, but our ordinary Kates and Taxcs,how many comings are there for them* and what threacning of fending Troups,c>OMony comes out of the peoples purfes, like bloud out of their Liver- vein : one of the rcafons ofMini- ftcrs unwillingnelle, to caft themWves upon peoples Bcncvo- lcnces,now in this cold climate of our Church, where, (if any where elfe) charity, according to our Saviouts prediction, is waxen chill? and the more, becanfe there are fluttering a- mongit us, feme ravenous Harpies and Birds, that, initead of the Galathians willingncfle to have plucked out their own eyes, and to have given them to Paul their Minifter,do ftirre up the people , and beftirre thcmfelves to pick, and peck out the eyes ol the Minifter, and to give them to their people, and fo to make blind e guides, to lead the blinde , that both may fail into the Ditch, Mimfter and people, both may be rui- nated. But that's not all that you fay (people are not willing to pay us minifters; our maintenance,) but (that itgoeth againft their conferences) as in the firft,you have belyed &c befhrew'd their hearts, where the will isy and I have (hewed you> that my people are willing to pay the due maintenance, and that upon good rcafons to themfelves may be fo willing : fo in this fecond, you cloud and corrupt their underftanding> , where the confcience is featcd ; and I (hall likewife tell you,that my people are confeicntious In jgying ol the due maintenance, and that upon juft caufe ancf^ood ground*, they may be fo confeientious. For I have at times preached of this point of miniftcrs maintenancc,and that by the Tythcs,or tenth of the increafe (as here I have difcourled of the fame to you) and have ac- quainted them, that they are challenged oy God himfclf for a portion holy to hi'mfclf ; that from time to time he hath appointed and afligned them over unto his minifters , that by a pofitive Law and Command he (etled them upon fuch ; that the pious Patriarcks, Abraham and Jacob paid Tythes of all Paying Tytbe not against confcitme rightly informed. \ 159 all to the Priefts j that in the Gofpel they are approved and ordained by (Thrift ; intimated and exhorted to by the Apo- ftle : befides the common light of nature and reafonvthe true grounds of piety and religion, the donations and dedications of them unto the Church? by devout and godly Patrons and Benefactours, a particular abatement of fomucb,asTythcs come to, by Landlords unto the Tenants out of their Rents, & a ratification of thefe by the national laws &: Acts of Par- liamenreftabiifhed, (wherein alfo there was the confent of the people of this Land joy ned, and included in their repre- fentauves : ) with all which,and fundry more evidences, my people are fo enlightned and confirmed in the due of this maintenance, and in the duty of their performance of it, that they give an annual Testimony of good confciencc, (as alio of their good will,) in fetting out the tenth unto me with quietnelle,and in accepting of the nine parts with thankful- nefTe unto God,riot withftanding all your fcrupulous injections and envious, but erroneous, fuggeftions you have promp:ed, or rather tempted them with : Wilt thou not ceafe to pervert the right wayes of the Lord, and of this Land ? for it's eaii: to per- ceive that you have been tampering with tome of their con- fciences, and troubling the peace of them, or otherwife how could you peremptorily affirm , and write to me, that my maintenance from them wasagainft their will Sc conlcience? I believe rather it goeth againft your confciencc than theirs ; and if they the falfe Kyo[\\csymea faring themfehes by them* felvesy and comparing themfehes among ft themfehes, are not wife as the Apoftle faith, 2, Cor. 10. 12, what are you, who mca- fure all other felfers and their confciencc^ , by your felf and your conference, and compare all other felfes, and their con- sciences with your felf and your, conference ? But conlcience is now adayes aniongft fome , made a Hackney to carry on any a&ion , or defigne, though foul and unjuft , (eat of things facrificed to Idols , maktr.g no que ft ton for confciencc fake,) fo is it made by others a fcare-crow to fright and drive away from fome works and duties , though fair and righteous , ( keep back part of, or the whole tenth part of the increafe,making aqucftionlor confcicnce fake.) What a frivolous, and frothy man are you at a Letter, or a Quarre, to flap a Minifler in the face, that his maintenance Y cocth 1 60 A iifcomfe ef^onfcience^hat Ag&inU itpbat noh goeth againft his peoples conferences h and never at all to clap him on the back , with Come Writ, or word againft it .* fome Law ol God ^ or the Land againft it : fome light of na- ture^- Grace againft it : fome example of Apoftle* fome grounds of reafon, fome Analogy of faith, fome fomething as^good as nothing againft it ? and yet it againft confeience ? ■ it may (perhaps) go againft an Italian popifh-Jefuited- dipper-dipt-rebaptiled confeience ^ (as, who get more by dieir unbounded &c illimited allowances, than we do by our fetled and determined maintenance) but it goeth not againft any 'Engl'fi Pcoteftant Chriftian Chriftened,baptifed ,and purified confeience. For* I pray, Sir, what is confeience ? It is called confeience, for that it is joyned with Science, and exercifeth its Offices by principles of knowledge im- printed in the underftanding; prelfe,becaufe of a joynt- feience and knowledge ? wherein fome other Communicate with us, as God and our ielyes : (I hope, you are not offend- ed at confeience , becaule of Science in it, which is alfo hu- mane j a thing,you have ftiewed the dif affe&ion to,humane Science and Art.) Is there now any thing in our maintenance by Tythes, that doth crofTe the common principles of knowledge , or rcafon imprinted in mans underftanding, or may hinder the Communication of knowledge? 'twixt God and us ? if there be, (hew it ; if not, then there is nothing in our maintenance , that goeth fo much as againft the very name of confeience,, Nor is there any thing in it, that may be againft the A£ts , or Offices of confeience. The firft Office of confeience is to be a witnefle, and fo the firft A£t is to teftifie of a thing done, or not done, good, or bad, inward, or outward :fo confeience tells every one, whether he hath paid his Ty thes, or whether he hath not , but this is not to the bufinefTe. The f ccond Office of confeience is to be a Judge, and fo the fecond A6k is to determine, whether things are to be done,pr no,and fo whether they be well done,or to be omit- ted as ill done. Now here , whether you will, or no , I (hall acquaint you with that, which the Divines ot the Univerfi- :ics call , the practical Syllogifme, or difcourfe of confeience, and Adifcsurfe ofconftitme^ what againft it% what m. i$i and it may be of very good ufe here* as whereby we (hall fee how confcience workech,and argueth for, or againft any thing ; and how any thing goeth along with , or agaiuft con- fidence. When a man, or woman is tempted to evil, or incited to omit the one, and to perform the other, the minde hath this diCcourfe with it lelf , whether it be Co to be performed, or not ; fo to be omitted, or not. Firft the fynteriks, or principle natural, imprinted in ail Souls, is this, all wrongfull and injurious things, botnto God and man, are evil> and not to be done : this makes the major or firft proportion. Secondly, the dictate of reafon aff umes the minor, or fe- cond proportion ; but the refuting, or detaining of the main- tenance of the Minifter, (this were enough, according to your Quaere , but I add) by Tythes, is a thing wrongfull and injurious to (Sod and man, (as I have all this while (hewed.) Therefore it is evil and not to be done, (for fo thirdly con- fcicnce infers the conclufion, and gives judgement upon the thing, thatjt is evil, and not to be done. So likewife Ithis practical fyllogifme , and argument of confcience concludes the other way , out of the former pre- mifes. That, which is juft, and equal, and honett, and hath no- thing in Scripture againft it, but rather the word and com* mand of Chrift, andjexamples of the Saints for it , that is to be, and ought to be dose, andperformed : that's the natural principle. But the maintenance of Minifters by Tythes, is juft, equal, and honeft, and hath nothing in Scripture againft it, but ra- ther the word of Chrift , and example of the Saints for it : this right reafon aflumeth as it hath been (hewed. There- fore the maintenance of Minifters by Tythes, is, and ought to be done, and performed. This the very confcience con- cluded and judgeth. Thus you lee, you are wide, and out of the way, w:ien you fay , our maintenance goeth againft confcience j nay , ra- ther confcience goeth againft the injuft defrauding us of the Came, and the denial of it to us* Judging it, and concluding j 62 A dtfeourfe of confeience, what again fi it, what not. it evil, adding thereto alfo a fee ret A£t and voyce ot inhibi- tion , or oppofition (do it not) (as in Reuben, flay him nor, his brother Pfiph,) and alfo, if he do it, another voyce , or Aft: of tcmurmuration at it, or accufation of the fame, we do not well, ^.27.31. 2 Kings 7.9. So alfo confeience goeth for the juft payment, and honeft giving us our maintenance, judging and concluding it good , adding thereto alio a fecrec Aft, or voyce of inftigation* or provocation, (doit) (as in Pilate, Chrilt the party accufed before him.) / finde no fault in him, 1 willjeleafe him. For he knew that for envy they had de- liveredh'im ; as alfo, if hedo it, another Aft, or voyce of ex- cising, or approbation : as the fame mans fpeech,w6** / have written, I have written, (\.e): I have done Well. Now therefore (to end this difcourfe of confeience:) when the rightfull payment of our maintenance thus fuggefted> and in this manner concluded ior, by confeience, is omitted and withheld from us* That (I am lure) may be called a fin againft confeience :Or when the wrongful! detaining of our maintenance thus difdaimed by confeience, and in this manner concluded againft by it, is performed and pra&ifeds Thar (I am as lure) may be called a fin againft confeience: But how the maintenance of us Minilters goeth againft the confeience of any people, is left now unto you, to provide a Syllogifme,or Argument for, to prove ic I have thus vindi- cated my people. I now come to defend my felf from fome force,or violence yjou would bring wpon me. For fo you charge me for frrcing. of maintenance from them. What forcing do your mean ; Behold here I ant, witneffe a- gpinfl me before the Lord and his people , whofe Oxe have I taken * or whofe Affe have I taken j» or whom have 1 defrauded i rvhom have I oppreffedi or of : whofe hands have I received any bribe to blindejnine eyes therewith t and I will refiore : li you, or my peo- ple will fpeak the truth, they muff, as the people there do of Samue/,[a.y , Thou hadfi not defrauded ut, nor opprejfed j you know that the Princes of the Gentiles exercife dominion ever them, and they that are great exercife Authority over them: but it i-; not fo with us> who are but your Minifters, and your fer- vams, at Matbtzoa f. and pra&ile no other force,or violence, than Mini ft en not covetous > nor ufe force in claiming their Tythes, 163 than the Kingdom of God fufferethjand whereby we may take it> the which alfo we call upon our people to pra^tife like wife, and your {elf alfo is (I hope,) a man of force and violence this way : You do not mean, do you, that our de- manding of our Dues,claiming our Tythes, maintaining our maintenance, is a forcing of it, or them ? Nay, is an orderly fecking of, a moderate iuing at Law (but in love) for our Dues and Rights, where they cannot be had in love • (with- out Law) and do you call , and mean this to be a for- cing of maintenance ? fo indeedyou feem to joyn them to- gether, forcing and fuing at the Law, and to make the later word,.to be the Interpreter of the former (wherein, fee ftill^how you have no luck to good order and Method : for forcing is not before fuing , but comes after the Suite ended, then force executeth.) But in the mean time you had need get a better intcrperter of your words and meaning than your felf ; for by your expounding you fpoil all, and make both words and things worfe, and you force the words, and ofTer violence to your meanmg ; For thus you make the whole Law of the Land to be a Law of force and violence ; and all the Lawyers to be minifters ol force and violence : Then if you fue your deb- tor at the Law upon a due Bond ,. you are a violent manor a man of force; or if your Landlord fue you for Rents un- paid, hefhallbe with you a man of force and violence. Wilt not thou pojfejfe what Chemofbthy godgiveth tbeetopojfejfey (o. Jephthah anfwered the King of Ammon, So whatf oe ver the Jndges 1 1 , Lord our God fhall give us to maintain our felves with, that 24, may we maintain and polTeffe, and that (if not otherwife maintainable) by fuing at the Law for it. May others in ju- rioufly detain from us our Rights, and may not we minifters peaceably maintain them ? Surely the force is on their fide, who fore ibly detain them, -not on our fide, who are forced to file tor them at Law? when in love we cannot obtain them. I know when we do fo, you cenfure us for covetous and con- tentious, and the one is as true as the other. They are cove- tous, who both excefllveiy love their own, their nine parts* and alfo inordinately defire other mens goods,the tenth part: And who I pray are thefe,the people,or the minifter / whe- Y 5 the?_ i 64 Minifters not contentious in chiming their Tphes. ther I am, or thott art the man ? for we defire no further than our own tenth, and that in an indifferent and moderate way „ wiftiing and defiring the bleflings and benedi&ion of God to be and reft upon the remainder in our peoples hands. i £V.il.l 6. And if any manfeem to be contentions^ we have no fttch ctiftome, neither the Churches of Gody nor the minifters of the Churches; for they are not all* contentious , or con- tentious at all,who not otherwife able to defend their due by their own power, contend for the fame by the ftrength of the Law, and there feek and Cue for remedy (though tome- times the remedy be as bad as the malady) in calm and quiec temper of their mind and affe£tions. But they are contenti- ous, who being nnfatisfied in their dues, and unfatiable in their demands, areprone.toquarrellandftrive, and where any thing of the former are wanting to them, or wrung from them, do not ouely fue for it> but purfue it ; as other diffe- rences 'twixt them and others, with much eagernefte yea bitternefte of fpirit, as that they aim at their own revenge, and anothers dammage, and are unwilling to have matters of difference ended, and fuits of Law (topped upon fair and equal terms. Andnowfhewme the man and minfter> who is thus contentious. I believe if there be fuch an one to be Ihewed, you will find him out. But in the mean time I tell you, you are much m/ftaken in the minifter you feem toinftance in, whom dwelling nigh unto,as you do,you might have informed your felf better of; (unlefTe it be your fafliion to ftrike him al waves who (lands next you, as your Coufin Will, was wont to do) I know the man and minifter better than your felf doth, and can allure that he never had anytriallat the Bar for Tithes with any of his people, for thefe thirty fix years, never fince he came amongft them, and yet hath had many wrongs and injuries done of fome : That he never had any warrant from a Juftice of peace for any, but onelyonce, and that was when fome would fet out the eleventh,and not the tenth% and he then (fayed the bufinelle to his own lofte, and not any of theirs: That he never (ued at the Law any, butonely «nce, when there was a Combination 'twixt three, or four to Minifters may lawfully [ue for Tythes 9when denied. lej to leave none of their Corn in the field for Tyche : and then alfo at their firft moron* when things were drawn up ready for Tryal> he took but the Angle valuations of their Corn, Tenth, or Ty the, when he could eafily have recovered Tre- ble damages; and befides there are at this time divers be- hindc in other Tythes for 6. and 7 .and more years,which he waiteth for in peace and patience : / k^ewfuch a man ; of fitch a one will I glor'ie , yet of my Jelf I wiA not glor'ie ^ or if I fhouk! , yen have compelled me , and enforced me ,. for I ought to have been commended of you •, for in this thing (of taking my Rights in a quiet, and realonable way, without any force , or Suites of Latt ,fot fo many years,) I am not inferiour to, or behinde the chiefeft Mtlli^ers> though I be nothing , and my people fome m ,hem,have openly atteftedasmuch, i £V. p. 3. But yet my anfwer to them that do examine mey (as you here do by your Quaeres) is this \ have we not power to eat and to drinl^ of the Table -, who ferve at the Table ? have we not power to tue *S ;mr meat and drink, as well as other perfons, and people 0lftC Lord and your felf ? or I onely ,and a Minifter, have wc rot power to forbear working, and to live of our allow- ance ? ^ a^ other *°rcs °* men » an^ political^ perfons, may, and ^°>in a g°°d,and orderly way Cue to obtain and prcferve t0 aiemfelves ,and their fucceffbrs, the due &: rights of their ?.vlannonrs,and Inheritances, and do,and may vindicate their private Lots, and portions, by a fair, and juftcourie of Law; why may not we, and all Ecclefiaftical perfons, living under the Government of the Magiftrates and the La ws,enjoy the fame benefit, and have relief at the Law, in the like cafes? when as there i; a withholding ol their portions and main- tenance from them, by force and violence ? if there be fome, as your felf , who think themfelves in conf cience bound not to pay us our Dues, we may better think our (elves bound in conlcience to defend out felves and our Rights, though by a Suite at Law,againlt fuch as would break in upon us,and rob us of our Tythes, (and not us onely, but God alfo, and his Church) eipecially, feeing they are committed unto Mini- fters in truft, (and that under an engagement, no lelle than an Oath) to maintain them, as much as is in our power, at the publick flock and common Treafury of the Church for the 1 66 Suing for Rights And Tphes mrr Anted by the word. the fervice and fervants of God , and chat not for our felvcs onely living, but for pofterity following. But I know you look for foreword, or warrant out of the Scripture,for this forcing and fuing at the Law, for your fpi- rit is , I fupeft , fomewhat Anabaptifed,fince your dipping, and is not onely Anti-minifterial, and Anti-decimal, but Anti-magiltratical, and Anti-nomian. You fee nomore,, than thofe other your Anceftours, for this Office of a Magi- ftrate,or the A8s of judicature, or the feats of Juftice, and Suits of Law. In the 18. of Math.ij. there is Chrifts Warrant for it5at the 1 5 th. verf. if thy brother jhalt trejpajfe aga'wfi thee ig* *ndtell him his fault betwixt thee andhim alone^if he {had hear thcey thou haft gained, thy brother ; if he mil not hear thee, theft takg Wifh thee one, or two witneffes, if he jhallneglett to hear them , tell it to the Church : So alio tell it po the Common- wealth,or Magiftra- cy, make your complaint, put in your bill, Commence a Smr, and fue for redrefle at the Law, and at their power, in £ *? Courts of Judicature, whether Ecclefiaftical, or Political J &> St. Paul very fully , and exprefly declareth, and warrant-th, the power of the Magistrate, according to the Law, to re- R»mti 3 . ward good, and to puntfh evil action 5 , commanding e^ery Soul to be fubjed thereunto, Sc that for contcience fake, and foinferreth,^^r/".7. Render therefore to all their dues , Tribute f* whom\Tribute, Cuftome to whom Cuftome , (and by the like pro-? portion Tythes towhomTytl.es) feing alio we have Cu- ftome for them, time out of minde, even through all ages, in this and other Nations ^ intimating that where Dues are not renJred accordingly, there may be fuing at theLaw,and add relies to the Magistrate, and his power , as a lawfull and good means ; yea, Gods means appointed > and ordained for the fame purpofe , for he is the Minift er of God therefore > and bearethnot thefwordinvain. You require in this matter of fuing at Law, for recovery of Tythes, onely a Warrant from the word of Chrift, but I (hall give as an over- plus into your Quatre : The example of St. -7W/,whoe/*tf.3 2,and 24. Chapt, and Aft. 1 5.11. being opprelled by an unjuft power, and injurious violence of the people and others , he went with his caufe to judgement, laid openhisadverfaries Calumnies,and conspiracies before the Poll- Law fuits bow Uwfall by the word of Cod, i6j Politicall, though Ethnick Magistrate, and for the better defence of himfelf and his caufe, removed hisfuit and ap- pealed zoCafary and the Indicatory of %ome himfelf, being a Citizen of %ome. And in Afts^ 1 9. 3 8. The Town-Clerk fpeaks to this purpofe, fand nothing to be excepted to it) // Demetrius and the crafts men which are with him have a matter again ft any man, the Law is open and there are depntiesjet tk m m- plead one an other. The Law is good, if a man ufe it lawfully : andfu'tsac Law are warrantable, if a man ufe them (utably, fo indeed the manner and circumftances of filing others at the Law,are more commanded, than the matter and fubftancc, or action itlelf is. I take it, (and I hope I miftake not) that thefe Iudici.ill proceedings and fuits are to be reckoned amongft the Adia- phora's and indifferent things , which arc neither good of th;mfelves,nor evil of themfelves,but as every one nfeth them, and putfueththem, and are of that kind of matter?, which are clean to the clean, according to the mind of the ufcr ol fuer. And fo then, they are neither abfolutely commanded nor abfolutely forbidden,but in refpect of fome cit cumftances: and what I have alledged out of the word of Chrift, and the example of the Apoftle, are not of peremptory enjoyn- ing us to fue at Law for recovery of our rights, but of a war- rantable juftifying of us when we do fo. And therefore you did well, (and better I believe than you were aware of) to demand here in this Quaere, onely a warrant out of Gods word, for authoriiing our filings; whereas in your other you call for a Precept out of the word to command and to enjoyn. us the thing. And now 6y thi> means, I (hall do two good works at once, anfwer alltheTextsof Scripture which are produced by your near kinfmen the^ A nabapt iuV, againft filing at Law, andalfoas I go take notice, in what manner , and widi what circumftances , this filing at the Law, is to be, and mult be. They alledge, Math, 5.39. Whosoever (hall [mite thee on thy right cheeky turn to him the other alfo , and if any man will fue thee at the Law , and take thy £oat , let him have thy Cloaks alfo, Z x. You 1 6% Suits of l*w howcArrhfr on, And with what circum'stAncei. 1. Youmnftnot cake Chrifts meaning Amply and abfo liucly, according as the words and the letter carriethit, as appears by his own praclifc, who did not turn the other che.k when one (mote him on the face with the palm of his band, but onely rebuked the party, If Ik five wellfpoien7 vhyfmitejt thou me. lohn 18.23. 2 Neither doth Chrift here absolutely or (imply forbid fil- ing at the Law, astotbea&ion, as which himfelf permit- ted and warranted in the Texts above mentioned ; but onely the manner ot ir? which was then acccording to the do- ftnnal interpretation of the Scribes^and Pharifeesjvindi&ivej,. with adefire and indevourof private revenge for that which yon have heard, hath been faid of old, an eye for an eye, and a toith for a tcoth , wound for wound ? (tripe for (tripe, Exod.21. 27, being fpoken of that publick revenge, which the Magiftrate doth exercife in the name of God when he puniflicth the wicked, they falfely interpreted and applied to private revenge? teaching that the injured party might re- venge himfelf privately of his enemy, any way in tooth and eye, tooth and nail, without any impeachment to his or that rightcoufneire of the Scribes and Phariices. This is that our Saviour oppofeth, andteachetb, that we ittpk no: be inflamed and iranfported with a hot and burning cieiire of revenge, to fcek the hurt and ruine of another, when there is matter of la wand fuit betwixt us and other?, and (o render cviil tor eviil ,brt rather recompence cvill with good: (this is to refift evil aright, and indeed) and do and fuffer any thing,our other cheek to be fmittcn,&: our cloak al- io to be taken away,6elore we run out into a violent revenge, and break the very-bond of our perfection, which is love and charity, and therefore the n^xc verfes to the former, are to the purpofe and point of loving, even our enemies, yea the laving of the very ox or afle of our enemies, we are then here taught and preicribed how to go to Law, and how to follow a fuit 9 (not forbidden at all to fuc at the Law) a That we be no: cafily or haftily provoked thereto, upon every or the firfl trefpaile or wrong done us, as here not upon the firfr fmiting of the one check,or the ftrft taking a- i/ay our coar; but flay till the fecond blow or pluck, let that begin Of frivate revenge. \'e^ begin the quarrell rather* For liiigioufncfle is but a certain itch, which when it breaks out upon a heat in a body, mull be fbpped and killed, and for the bodies and fouls health too. 2. Wemuftnotentcrintoafuit at Law for cheek or coar, andpnriuc with fecret hatred to the (miter and taker away,or with any purpofeot revenge to break him or (trip him naked ; but in an cquall and juft way, and with calm and immode- rate affection, to defend our own Rights* our right andlefc cheek, and to keep our coat and our cloak on our backs. It isone thing to offend another to his evil and hurt, and ano- ther thing to defend our (elves in our goods and rights. Thac is to render evil for evil, which we are forbidden ; as to give him poyfon to drink -: this is to maintain our good horn evilj which we are permitted, as to drive out poifon by an antidote, 3. In our fuits at Law> our aim and intention mi ft be to. amend the (miter and taker away, and to hold or bind hi* hands, to make him know his errour, or vilenc(ie» and to leave k. And in cafe he be knowingly injurious, and per ti- natioufly wrongfuil, yet our hearts and dehres mud not be for the undong, nor endamaging of him and hispoftcrity: but for the fecuring and defending of our (elves, right vand our families, and the propulfing his wrongs and injurics,with- our doing him the like. Thcfe things thus (alved and obferved, a man, a minifter, may fue at Law for recovery of dues of Tithes, and hath warrant from God? and provided for here. Yea from th;s text of Scripture, though feemsngly produced to the contrary. Nor in the i. Corinthians 6, i. &c, doth the Apoftle tax in any Chriftians, their Tirng at the Law for the Re- covery of dues, or Catisfaction of wrong abtolutely , as if it were an evil a£H6n for itsfelf* and in us (ubftancc, but re- fpectively, and onely in~£he circumftances ot it, as when it was fcandalousunto them, as there it is (aid to be in thefe re- i pedts. i . Of the matter due, for wrong done, that it was of fmafl moment , and of light concernment. 2. and 5. verfes 2. Of the perfom fuing 5 and their difpofition , tnar they were foloon provoked, and eafily prone to Law, and impa- Z 2 tient I7-0 Suing for Tjthes m oppsftttg Gods rvilL uent of wrong, readier to do it, then fuffer it? in verf, 7. sc %. 3 . Of the Judge they went before,and the Courts they fued in ; that is, of unbelievers and iufidcls, - Now ior the firft refpecr, though the matter of our due ' Tyihc be not great in the value of it > yet it's great in the concernment, for it being denied and fubftra£ted by one,it's an encouragement, and will be an example to another, and fo to all the Parifli to do the like wrong, if not righted ; as a gap made by one head-ftrong fheep , is a way made for the whole flock to follow after, if it be not flopped : And for the iecond, who amongft us M inifler sis there, that is fo hafty and forward at fuing in the Law,untill patience, and all fair means have been ufed? yea, perfwafions and defireshave been made, cpmpofition offered, and Mediations of others alfo tendered &: interpofed : and for the third refpeel: there is no occafion,no poflibility of giving any fcandal that,way,fce- ing ail are now Chriftian Tribunals amongft us, through the over-fpreading of the Gofpel : Lived we under fuch Heathen & infidel govcrnours, we would eafily dothe one thing S.Patil urgeth there j that is, take wrong, and fuffer our felves to be defrauded of Chriftians rather, than to contend at Law for it, before Infidel-, and fo give themoccafion to traduce and flander our Chriftian profeffion : Yea, we will eafily do the other thing, St. 'Tml alfo in that cafe preffeth there , though now that we live under Chriftian Rulers , fet up any wife- men to judge, who are beft efteemed in the Church, and the Chicfcft of the Saints, to Umpire and Arbitrate any of our differences at home, hereby to fhew our unwillingnefle and averfenefTe, from fuings at the Law abroad. As for that,which one of yours addeth, it is Gods will wc muft fuffer wrong and injury , and be damnified in our Ty thes ; and will we refift Gods will and give an ill example before us : It is fuch a fond fpeech, that I will onely fay this to it, by way of retortion, or retaliation; it is Gods will we fhould repel wrong and injury, and be fatisfied at the Law ; and fhall we negletb Gods will, and leave an ill example bc- hindeus? So it's Gods will, we fhould be wounded, or dif- eafed and Tick ->andit is likewife Gods will we (hodd, u(e alllawfull remedies and Medccines for our cures and reco- veries And No breach of love to your neighbour. 171 And that's as filly, which another of yours urgeth. But if thy brother be grieved , now walked thou not charitably, deftroy not him for whom Chrift died : that's fpoken of meats that were indifferently ufed. I (hall retort here again, Sc (peak it of tythes , which are neceffarily duc,if thy brother be grieved (for his Tythes deniedjnow walkeft not thou cha- ritably ,deftroy not him (by withholding his livclyhood)for whom Chrift died : Again^the love of a Neighbour ought to be ruled and regulared by the lqve of God : how then can that, the love of the Neighbour be preferved whole,and en- tire by us, when as this, the love of God is violated, and bro- ken by you, in wronging and inuring him, and his Minifters in his, and their Tythes ? Laftly, is that breach of charity, which fheweth to the adverfe party, and the injurious per- ion, his errour and offence, both to God and man , and ftri- veth, &c laboureth by lawfull means to bnng him to amend- ment and reformation ? both may (land well together > the love of our Neighbour, and the defence of our felves, in a good caufe, and in Gods caufe , as this is; even as Mofes en- tirely affected his people of Ifrael, and yet contended and itrove with them, and againft them , asoft as they offended. Your third Qusre being about baptifme, by my ordering of your difordered ftufte ,; belongeth unto your laft fheet , which is wholly of that matier,and (o is referred thitherto be. anfwered, all of the fame matter together. Se&. IX. Ofjdmifsionofperfomtothe Lords Supper. YOur fourth Quaere I come therefore to next , which is this, what warranty on have from the words of £hrift^for ad- mitting ofperfonSyto the Lords Sttpper^ before they are baptised ac- cording to Qhrifls lnftitntlon^and holding forth the -works of holi- nejfe towards Godyandri that as you admit none unto the Table of your houfe,but fiich as come in an ordinary way, through the doors of the fame :fo I admic none to the 1 able of the Lord, butfuch as are entered into the Church, that vilible houfe of the Lord, by- the door of baptilme, h the ordinary, and ordained way; if born of Christians, when they come to a capacity to difcerne and be- lieve : if converts of Heathens, as foon as they make profef- 1 fion of faith, and expreflion of defires. I know well enough your meaning,bnt I will not alwayes put words into your mouth, I hope you will learn at length to fpeak, it not your Mother tongue of the old Font-bapcifma),yet your brother tongue of the new Dippal-pond. So the n\-ft mark of your , and our Communicant gucfts, is owned and acknowledged, according to the Letter and matter of your words, they arc baptifed ones, according to the inltkurion of Chrilt : If youknowof any other,take them away with your felf, carry them home, and keep them at yor.r Table, and charge not us, and the Lords Table, for ad- mitting fuch impertinent, and incompetent guefts, as unbap- tifed ones are , no more then you could have warranted the Jews^ and their Pafchal Lamb, for admitting the uncircum- cifed one, to fit down and eat with them thereof. For that which folio weth,eicher change your words into o- thers,or make fome fenfe of thefe,& when I|underftand them & you, 1 lhall give you fome anfwer : in prefent thus they run and hang together like ropes of fand; ( Before they are baptifed ac- Who holdfonb righteoufnejfe , And folimffe. 173 accor&ns to Chrifts inftitution^and holding forth the rvor^j ofholi- nejfe towards Cod and rtghteoitfreffe towards man,} The laft words muft either be a further explication of the former, or a new qualification of a Communicant : if the former, then holding forth-oiholiacfTe,C^r. And Clinics initiation mult be two things , according to which, they were not baptifed for the conjunction , And, fo coupleth them, as you may re- flecl: and lee { and then, whofe holding forth is here meant ? it feems Chrifts , or whofe elfe ; for fo you joyn them Chrifts inftkution,and holding forth, &c. if his, what is it, his hold- ing forth: holinefte ? you {hould have added , their holding forth, tf*. for you cannot mean his : & if you add their hold- ing forth, &e4 and joyn it toChriiHinftitution, then both, Chrifts inftitution and their holding forth of hoiinefTe muft be a joynt-iule and ground, according to which perfons are tobebaptfed. But if you intend thefe laft words, (and holding forth the works of holinefle towards God,and righteoufnefle towards man) as a new note, or qualification of a perfon to be admit- ted to the Lotds Supper ; then you fhould have made Engtifh thus : and have {aid, and before they hold forth, &ct inftead of, and holding fortb,c^c. and fo you would have made a di* ftinft note , or quality, in reference to admiflion unto the Lords Supper, and not to CivniU inftitution. I would not take f uch pains with you, thus to teach you to (peak, 8c write true fenfe and Englljh , bit that I hops to bring you to a bet- ter liking, and at laft to put you into a brown ftudy , not of the black, but of the white , and Candid Arts and Science of the Candidates of the UniverOty. Suppofing then this to be your meaning, what ever you write, and you to defcribe another note of a Communicant , yourequre a Warrant from me out of Gods word , for my admitting of fome to the Lords Supper, before they have this Note, before they hold forth the works of holinefle to- wards God ,and righteoufnefTe towards man : And I aufwer you here again , that I lhall not need to go to Chrift , that Lord Chief J uftice of Peace, for a Warrant herein for my fclf(unleffe it be for you for falfly (lander ing.) For I admit none to the Lords Supper,but (uch as do hold forth i 1 74 Regenerate ferfom fofar as how a, forth luch works of holinefle to God ,&; nghteoufnefs co men, and hold them forth, partly in proielfion;for is not the profefli- on of Chrift and his Gofpel,a holding forth of Chrift and his Gofpel, as a light unto others , and partly in pra&ife , for arc not the pra&ifes of faith in God, and prayer unto God, and repentance of fin againft God, the holding forth of works of holinefTe to God ? are not the pra&ifcs of loving their neigh- bour, preferving their lives, relieving cheir wants? and be?ng mercifull to the poor, are they not the holding forth works of rightepnlneflc to nun e tucti do I admit to the Lords Sup- per, and hold them meet to whom I may hold forth the Seales of Chrifts body and bloud, for their further holding up ; and you might have done well to have held your tongue and your peace here , if you knew when to do it j but that's a ilippery and unruly-Member, there is no hold of it. But now thirdly, you will hit it fure at laft ; for you have (hot twice beudes, or rather beyond the marke : for you add now in the end, thus : hi a word, (for in your words, which you have fpoken many to nopurpofc,there are alto many va- nities, as I have (hewed. I will therefore liften to what you fay, {in a word) before they are born of watered of the fpirit^or at leaftfofar as man can judge them fo to be. Sir, in a word, I thank you for this word ; I commend you for this, in a word, it is in a word one of the wifeft words rhat ere you (pake in all your two fhects : this one word will help you at a dead lift, and lift you , and your Neighbours Oxe , or Affe out of the ditch, for you were fallen in ; and therefore you do well at laft, to come in with fuch a word, at leaft, or elfe you had been at a great lofle, to fay, we are not to admit any to the Lords Supper, before he, or (he be born of water,and thefpi- rit. For how fhall I know, and judge, that you are born a- gain of water, and the fpirit, (though twice baptifed of wa- ter?) how can you know, or judge our Chriftian Infants (though but once baptifed of water) are not born again of Water, and the fpirit i what man knoweth the things of a man, fave the fpirit of man^tvhich is in htm} even fo the things of God9 fyoweth no man but the fpirit of God , and he to whom the fpirit doth reveal them , which fearcheth all things, even the deep things of God : leave we this then, the knowledge of who is born Who regmrnujknoven to God onelj. 175 born of water, and the fpirir, and who nor, to the fpirit of God, let you and I go no farther at moft then to your word at lealt,fo far, and no farther, as man can judge them fo to be: And that's not very far in this point of regeneration. Thi*(at leaft fo far as man can judge them to be ib)(alves up all again. li'David when he (pake, and meditated of his natural Ge- neration, when he was made in forehand curioufly wrought in the loweft place of the earth, and lo fearfully made , he faith indeed to, and of God ; thine eyes did lee my iubftance being yet imperfect and all my Members were not hid from thee, but were written in thy book, Pfal.i 3 9. 1 5. and 16. but for himiell he laith,wr/;6. iuch knowledge is too wo ideriuli for me, it is high, I cannot attain to it ; and is not the know- ledge of our own, and much more of anothersipiritual birth and regeneration, with all the fubftance 8c matter, the parts, and Members, much more wonderful], and fo high,that nei- ther you nor I, nor any man can attain to it, or judge at all of it ? not fo far as thereupon to judge them new born , or wor- thy Communicants) and admit them ; or otherwise unwor- thy and not born agaimandlo to exclude them,as you would have it, and me. And bcfides, man cannot as your (elf , cannot go very far, in judging of thole that are regenerate, and born again of water, and the fpirir, becaufe even Children of nature onely, and of wrath, have fometimes conceptions of the fpirir, as to the materials of this new birth, wrought in them by the Mi- niftery of the word, as knowledge of his word, fenfe of fin, fear ofpunilhment,defire of pardon, hope of mercy, which are the preparaitve matter to the A£t of regeneration jthefe may appear and look j)ig, and yet fall, and be ftifled in them, and they prove abortives, and mifcarriages, or Hill-born, as we fay : fo it's Heb. 6 .4. 1 5 , I deny not, but a man may go fo far as to ghelle at a new* born, and regenerate perfon , who is formally lo , whole heart is new-lormed,&: will changed, &c. from thole marks and figns are given,as faith in Chrift> love to God, mortifica- tion of fin,defirc of fpiritual food, contempt of the world, likeneffe to God, fpiritual life and fenfes, growth in grace, A a But i j6 Where gtniuU^ known to God onelf . But in fomc\ or rnany of thefe Hypocrites may giiur, and carry a fair, buc a falle light : and \o cannot be avoided : true ProkiTors (perhaps) are not alwayes ilh;ftr:ous , or eminent in all,. dc feci: ive (it may be; in fome of them, and may yet b$ admkted unto the Lords Supper. Indeed true communicants that will be,ought to judg fo far of thcmfelves , as to findethemfelves-in lome meafure new- born of water, and the fpirir, and to have in themfelves fome fpiritual life, hunger and th it ft, before they come to par- take of the fpiritual food of thebody,and bloud of Chrifh and this they muftdo; by the judgement of private difcretion and difcrimination, examining, and judging themfefves. And for my fclf,when I tee them doing fo,and (hewing forth fome acts and fruits of regeneration and fpiritual life, as repenting, believing, defiring the body Si bloud of Chrifr, I fhall judge fo far of them,asio be(fo far as man can judge) born again ? and regenerate of the f pint, and in fome mea- fure fie to be admtted to the Lords Supper, by a judgement of probability and Charity vuntill you can dire£t me to fome other Tribunal of yours , or Presbytery of others , where 1 may have a better judgement, and of more certainty , and infallibility to proceed, and admit by. But fpeak out, Sir, and as the Proverb faith , fpeak as the vulgar do, your felf being of the vulgars, leave thefe new, phrafec, and fine Paraphrafes of the matter, thefe deep-di- ving, and high-flying words; are they not the ignorant, and filly, the prophane, and the fcandalous, you mean, when you fpeak of perfons, whom I admit to the Lords Supper, before they hold forth works of piety to God, and of righteoufneffe to men, be bcrn again of the water and the fpirit ? and do you not ask what Warrant I have for it out of Gods word ? I know you look for Commands and Examples here, (for that's your ufual courfe and demand : ) I hope either of them out of the Scripture0, and much more, bpth.of them will be Warrant enough for me, if I can flicw it. Sir, let me break of here, and refer you to books lately written, and largely difcufilngthis point ; for I begin to be weary, and intend to be Ihort in ic. Onely, I fhall produce the example of our Saviour Chrifr, a good Warrantee bed that Regenerate and unvgenerate, as mix t Admitted. 177 that can be for my felf. His admitting Jttdat to the Sacra- ment of the Lords Supper, before he was lan£tified and rege- nerate, is my Warrant for admitting, and doing the fame. And yet me thinks , (if Parabolical precepts be argumen- tative, as me thinks, they fhoi Id be in the pout ofrhe mat- ter, chiefly fcoped, and intended by them.) That word of Chrift in the parable,let both grow together, is no life a precept and command, than that of the Apoftle, let a man examine himiclf : and commandeth , that the ignorant and {candalous,or (becauie you love your own language befr,) the unregenerate and wicked , unavoidably mi.xt ivitfi the regenerate and godly, and coming to the Congregarion, where the. Sacrament is, ought to be permitted and admit- ted of my felf, or other Minuter of Chrift, to receive the Seals and pledge^ of Chrifts body and blond , and not to be excluded of me ;even as the Tares unavoidably grow- ing up amongft the Wheat, and {landing in the field, were to be differed and endured of the tervants of that houlholder, to partake of the benefit of the Sun-fhine; and Rains falling there, without their plucking them; the fervants would in- deed have gone and pulled them up , the Tares from the Wheat, but the Houfholdcr forbad them, telling them that in the time of Harveft he would give order to his Reapers to feparate them the one from die other :fo fomc hafty man would be heaving and fhoving out the wicked from the god- ly, the fcandalous from the righteous , but Chrift inhibites them, as who hath committed this work of feparation to thote purer difcerning Miniftring fpirit^, to undertake, efpc- cially in the end of the world. I (peak to you thus in that parable, that feeing , you might feeandunderftand,itbe'ng of an ordinary thing to fee in your trade and calling. But there is a plain precept even in the Letter to warrant the {aroe, by our Saviour Chrift, Luke 12,19. This do in remembrance of 'me : and becaufe the thing is eftablifhed with God ,it is doubled by Si. Paul, 1 Cor. 11. This do inremembrance of me : and again, ( it is ) trebled) (hevf je forth the Lord's death till he come : the which being Ipoken by Chrift unto the Apoftles,and by St. Paul to the Church oiCorimh^ both Paftour and people, distributer and receiver Aa 2 ' (as 178 Regenerate andunregenente, as mixt^Admitted. (as the Apoftles alfo reprefented both) exprefly commands? the on: to admit to the Lords Supper, and to give it , as the other to come to it, and to re ceive; Yea , but fay ycu,not be- fore the Paftour (hall have Co tried,and thereupon know,and found the people to be born again of water, & the fpirit,and holding forth the works of piety &: righteouf nefTe. See how you fpiit upon the fame Rock you bid me beware of> Tradi- tions , Additions , and Inventions of men j for what elfe is this, where the Law diftinguifheth not , your diftinction? and where (Thrift limited not, nor reftraineth his precept, your bringing in fuch Additions and Traditions of your own, fuch Limitations and fveftrictions of your own, that have no foundation in Scripture j yea, that are againft a foundation in Scripture othe'rwile? (for the Apoftle faitb5. let a man therefore examine himfelf to finde himfelf fuch be- fore he come, and impofeth it not upon the Paftour, to try him, and to finde himfich before he admit him.) I muft alib tell you moreover, then what I told you, and (aid of them,thar they are alfofaucy prefumptions,and infolent ar- rogancies,and a taking upon you to Teach and Tutour the Almighty, and onely- wife, how to make Laws and Pre- cepts. Bur the example of Chrift and the Apoftles were a War- rant alfo for me diffident, to juftifie my praetife, and to nul- lify your prating. And becaufe I have mentioned the Church of Corinth: I ask you firfthow it was there, at the administration of the Lords Supper? Surely, St. Taul deli- vered them a good Plac-form,even the lame that he re- ceived ofthe-Lord , that he delivered to them , with all material things belonging thcvetorf.sverf.zi. and promising alfo for o- ther circumftantials , that he would fet them in order , when he came at verf. 34. But now I ask you, what word have yon here, that the Minifters of the.Church of Qnrmth admitted none before they were foand fo>as you defcribe them? where doth the Apoftle charge them not to-do fo ? where doth he empower them to fet by, and (hue out the un-regencrate, the prophane ? (what chargeth to do, or not do, he impow:eth alfo,) and if there had been any fuch thing to be done, now had been the time, when he was writing this Epiftle to them? round- Regenerate andunregtnerau^ as mixtyadmitte d. 172 roundly to have fliaken them up for not discharging their places and Offices, in excluding fuch kinde of people and worfer, that came to the Lords Supper with them : Eipecial- ly here at large, condemning the abules of the Sacrament in that Church, and thatofpurpofejwhere better could he have told them of fuch a material thing, and notorious abufe as this was ,dieir admitting of fuch unworthy eaters &c drinkers, fuch contentious,and luxurious, and fcandalous, and igno- rant. Surely, the zealous A pottle would have put a fcourge into their hands , and have authorifed them to have whipt out St lahYt out fuch, the prophaners of the Sacrament,out of the houfe of God, or would have (harply reproved them,as David doth the life-guard of SanL Ye are worthy to die,becaufe you have not kept your Matter, the Lords anointed , but fuf- fered one of the people to fetch away the Spear and Crufe of water, 1 ^w.2 6. 16.(0 would the Apoftle, have {everely checked them for their negligence and fecurity in that , (be- ing the Guardians of the body and bloud of Chriff,and the Stewards of his myfteries,(as all other Miniftersare)they did not better fecure the body 8>c bloud of Chrift/rom the hands ot fuch unworthy, and the un- regenerate, but admit them to partake thereof, and in that they did notfet higher , and ftronger bounds round about the Mount, (that large upper Room, where they ufed to celebrate the Sacrament) to keep of theunfan6fified?andunregenerate people from breaking through, to gaze and lay hold, leaft they died. . Bnt here's no fuch charge given, or rebuke made,unto the Minifters of Corinth in particular (though you of a more fie- ry, but not more zealous fpirit than Paul , fail very hot upon me for the fame no fault, and call: icalding water,even fcold- ing words in my face,and are ready to appeal me, unlefle I have a Warrant to (hew, (which I have mewed J for my ad- . mitting people to the Lords Supper before, as to my know- ledge they are born again of water, and the fpirit. Yea, from the beginning it was (o, with the other Apo- ftles, for ^^.2.41. and 42. The breaking of bread there was Sacramental, (I Qull noc need to flay proving it,) and the Apoftles there acted not as extraordinary Apofties, but as A a 3 or" 1 80 Apoftles (though ignorant) Emitted. ordinary Minifters : (which is as eafie to be granted) and yet you read not of two fuch qualifications mentioned to have been in thofe three thouland Soul*, and required of, and known by the Apoftles, before they were admicted to the Sacrament, as of being born of water and thefpirit , and holding out the works of piety and righteoufneffe to God and nun; onely your fi. ft is there mentioned, which is agreed upon, that of being before Jbapufcd, and fomethmg more ad- ded, ( which is done amongft us, and whereof we can , and may take knowledge) their gladly receiving the word be- fore : fo are the words in full, then they that gladly received his tvordyWere baptised ; and the fame day were added unto them about three thousand Souls^and they continued ftedfafk inthe Ayofties Vottrim & fellowship ,& 'm brewing bread^'t»prayers^{t,e,)xho.y became Profeflors and Difcples , and fo Communicants. But I come to the example Paramount , the example of all example-, which herein will warrant me, I will warrant you: it is the example of our blefled Lord Sc Saviour Jefus Chrift> who admitted Judas Ifcanot, his Difciple, to the Sacrament of his Supper, before he held forth the works of piety to God, or righteoufnefte towards man, at leaftwife before he was born ot water and the fpirit, when he was both ignorant and fcandalous through his impiety and unrighteoufnefte, and known to be fuch by the Miuifter of that Sacrament, and revealed to be fuch, unto his fellow-Communicants: (I will here (pare you, and give you in again your limitation, (at leaf! fo far as man can juige him to be fo, as being of no life here, though I made benefit of it elfewhere,) Chrift both God and man, could judge of him. I might make tome menton of the other Apoftles, in one of the point*, that of ignorance ; how that they did not nn- derftand the myftery of Chrifts death and Paflion before, as may appear in Luke 9. 44.^, and Mark^.9. 31. wherein lieth, the life of the Sacrament, i^r.11.26. neither alfo did they undcrftand the myftery of the Rcfurrection before , as is evident in John 20.9. wherein alto lieth the Remiflion ot /in, ^w.4.2 5. whom notwithstanding, our Saviour Chrift cal- led to his Supper, and admitted of them, affording them (no doubt) fome further meafure of underftanding by the pre- fent ludas both ignorant^ and wicked admitted. i $ i lent words of inttitucion fpokem and work o{ adminiltration done : (which may touch thofe, who arc fuch rigid exactors, of knowledge of the mytteries ot Chnft in the people , that they will admit none? before they can come up to them in undcrftanding, and anfwering cf their harder Queftions and Quirks fometimes '•> and alio :t may teach others, that are of the minde, the Sacrament, and the word of inftitucion, and other fentences of the word, pertinent thereto, and pro' nounced thereat , do no whit enlighten the minde, and give clearer infighc into themyltery ofChrifts death and pa(- fion. But J ihall inftance onely in Judas ; who, befidcs that he was partaker cf the fame ignorance as the other Apoftles, and that in a greater meafure, as may appear, tor that when there was a work done againft the day ot Chrift his Matters. Burying (a box of precious Alabafter broken , and poured cue upon his head,) Judas Ifcariot by name, out of his dul- nelTe and incapacity of under ftanding thereof,excepted to it, and was incenfed at it as a watte and lofle, Markji^. He wasalfo a icandalous perfon , or he was even fuch, a one as you, by no means will yield to be admitted. He was not born of water and the fpirir, as, who was a carnal man,and favoured not the things of the fpirit of God, when he onely fpake,and thought of felling the oyntment for 500 pence, but cared nothing for the anoynting of Chrift; body to his burying. Again, he held not forth the Works of piety to god, or righteoutneile to man ; for like the unjuit Judge in Luke 18.2. He feared not God nor regarded man. He betrayed the ion of God , and therefore feared not God : neither regarded he man ; for be cared not for the poor , and was a Thief , John z a, 6. And moreover , he was covetous^ what will ye give me, and I will deliver him to you faith Ju- das,ofhis Mafter,ro the chief Priefts, Math.i6.14, and fohe was an Idolater, Col, 3 . 5 . t heref ore impious to God, 8C much more, fuch, in that he was Sacrilegious alfo, felling the Holy one, and confecrated of God, for thirty pieces of filver rancl ■ alfo unrighteous to man, for Chrift wasalfo his Matter, *ani ludas his fervant.and if he was his Matter, where Was the fer- Yants fear ?.#*<*/. 1. 6. And 182 IudAs^boihignorm Andrvicked^admitted, And leaft you might think J#^ became all thefe , not before the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , but after that the Devilentred into him upon the eating of the fop, St* Mat* rW 36.2.14.^. and Mark 1 4. 1. 8c ia. affirm that the lafl: of thoie his impious and unrighteous works he held forth, namely his betraying his -Mafter , was two nights before the PaiTeover, and fo the Sacrament, and fo in the mouth of two witneffes that word of truth (lands •• and this makes your bu- fmefle the worfe, that Judo* ihould be admitted to the Sa- crament by Chrift, when as but two nights before it , he was in,aud about fuch an impious and unrighteous work , as it made hidas the more vile and unworthy that would be even two nights. before, plotting and projecting fuch mifchief, when as by the order of the PaiTeover he (hould have been full four dayes in fitting, and preparing himfelf to the eating of the PafchalLamb, Exod.i 2 A And leaft you might tell me that you fpeak of fuch as are actually , and really no holders out of the works of piety and righteouihefte,andare notorioufly known, and detected to befuch before the Sacrament, fo as Indas was not before the Sacrament, but onely in purpofe,as a clofe, and fecret Hy- pocrite Jhf fay. 1. This agreeth not to your other part of your Defcription , for (as 1 faid before) how can it be openly known, who is actually Regenerate, born of water and the fpirir, as it may be,who is a holder forth of the works of piety and righteoufnelie, before they be admitted ? But fecond- ly, Iudas was more thai inpurpofe,an impiou%and unrighte- ous worker ; for fo Chrift faith, Math, 16.2* The [on of man is betray edt» be Crucified; Is betrayed as to the fact paft in the Covenant &c agreement : and were not ludas his contrivan- ces, bargainings, fellings of Chnft,a very prcfenr,and actual betraying of Chrift,wanting nothing but execution^ appre- henfion, and if not, I am fure they were all impious, and un- righteous works, really , and actually , vifibly Icandalous to him an Apoftle of Chrift amongft the Chief Priefts,& which with a little looking into, might eafily have been known, of the other Apoftle? who were told of his treafon two dayes before the Lords Supper, but that they did not much minde it , or Chrift urge it, For that Chrift and his other Apoftles would ludas both ignorant and wicked admitted. 183 would give no fuch examples of prying, and fife ing into all other men,to finde out what fins they live in, and what cour- ies they take before they be admitted to the Sacramenr. You Ice then , Judas was not fo qualified as you require everyone to be, before he is to be admitted to the Lord? Supper, and yet our Saviour admits him , as being one oi his houfhold Servants , his Gofpel-profeflors , his Church-Mem- bers,now this of Chrifts admitting Indus to theLordsjSupper muft needs be the main , and the matter of my anfWer to your Quaere :when you ask me> what Warrant I have to admit any to the Lords Supper, before they be righteous and regenerate (for I will now cut ihorter your long train of words you to delight in) I dare fay, you did not think of Chrift the Lord, admitting ludas unto the Lords Supper, or if you did your opinion is quite to the contrary, that Chrift did not admit of him, adminifter to him, wherein you did not ufe the prudence of the Serpent, which forefeeiug the blow a coming,defendethher head with her body wreathed and circled about it ; you could not but forefee, that I would lift up the example of Chrift admitting Iudas unto his Sup- per, and adminiftring it to him,as a great ftafFe to crufh your heady opinion,it may be your head-opinion: in your Quarre, you ihould have done wifely to have awarded the blow co- ming) and have guarded the fame by fome body of reafons and arguments , or rather Texts of Scripture, woven , and wreathed about you, as Armour of proof , or reproof, as weapons of defence, or offence. Inftead of doing whereof , the getting of fuch arguments about you, you may praSiie another fubtdty of the Serpent, which is to flide away into fome hole, or under fome hedge? and hide your head,8chiilc with your Tongue there, whileft I bring our, and lift up the great fticpheards itafte, the word of Chrift, to prove, that Iudas was admitted to the Lords Supper, and partaked of the fame, and fo to break the Ser- pents head,and ftopthe mouth of a gain-hifler. Chrift with the twelve Apoftlesfate down to the PafTeover Markj^, and did eat : and difcourfing about that Apoftle that Oiould 1 7^ betray him; and they anf wering one by one, « it I^and U h /, verf.lO, heanfweredy it is one of the twelve that dippeth mth me in B b the i S 4 $ ttdas both ignwant and wicked admitted. thed'fh) verf. 20. and chcn, verf, 22, as they didear, i'ejm too'r^ bread and blcjfedy and brake , and gave it to themy and [aid , Take eaty this is my body : and he tookjhe Cup7 and when he had given than\s-)he gave it to them ; arid they allydrankj)f it: and (aid, this is my blond of the New Teftament? which is jhed for many. All things are fo diftinctly, ordeiiy,and numerically fet down , that you muft either deny Judas to be one of the twelve Apoftles, or you muft yield Judas communicated of the Supper of the Lord : and I take it, the word, All, is therefore alfo, as onely exprefTed in their drinking of the cup, to prcvectand forewarn againit the fubftra&ing of the ci>p,hom the Common-people,and members of the Church, reptefented in the Apoftles alfo,which the fpiritof God fore- law would be attempted, and we fee, is effected by erroneous fp!rirs in the later ages. Luke 22.1 2 » There our Saviour,doth as it were point out with the fi iger, Judas unto us, or point as unto Judas by the tinge r, Behold the hand of him that betrayeth me, is with me en the table;the very fame table whereat he fitteth now,in the two verfes'preceding immediately, bleffing and diftributing the Sacramentall bread and wine to the Apoftles, which isfo clear,cfaat both;.M*/t^w,and Mark^do apparantly by a con- junctive particle,;^, knit thele two things together, this giving of the Sacrament, and the telling of J«^/ Treafon, bjth at the fame Supper, unto the other Apoftles there, Math, 26, 2*. 2 6, Mark} 4. 1 S.and 22. Nowleaft, for Name fake, you being better acquainted with John the Evangelift, may happily think upon that in the 1 3. of John the 2d.and the 39. how that Judas having received the fop, dipped by our Saviour Ch rift at theFeaft of the PafTeover, to give fome notice to the reft, of his be-* ing the traitout'jwent immediately our, and therefore could not be prefent at the Lords Supper, and much lefTe partake thereof: I would wifti you not to boaft too much of your Cognomen, or Namefake herein, as who nothing favou- red! your opinion* For when Chrift had given Judas the fop, and thereupon bid him. That thou doefi do, do quickly , the o- ther Apoftles not knowing for what intent he fpake it,Thought becaufe Judas had the bag, that Jefus had [aid unto him, Buy thofe things fitdds both ignorant andwkked admitted. 185 things that vce have need of again ft the Feaft^ or that he fhould glvefomethingto the poore, ver. 28. 29. where you hear chat rhe Apoftles thoughts and Words were, buy things needjult againft the Feaft ; iothenkwas not the Feaft of PafTeover, when the fop was given, and ludas went out,That Feaft was not yet come, as is alfo exprefly fet down in the .firft verfe> Before the Feaft of the Pajfeover, and yet verfe 2. a Supper men- tioned) at the end of which Icfus wafted his difciples feet, even Inda's feet, and after that revealed the traytour to h s A- poftle Iohn, by giving him the fop, having told him, he was the traytor:fo then the Supper, at which Judas received the fop>and from which he went out immediatdyjwas a Supper , two dayes, or one day before the PafTeover as you alio may from the 26. tjiiath. 2. if 'you compare them,togcther,whicn was but a common, ufuall Sc ordinary Supper, which was not neither intended as fome would for the exclufion of ludas from die Sacrament, but onely for the detection of Iudas before the Sacrament : For he came afterwards both to che PafTeover, and to the Sacrament , as hath been fhewed: And for that dimiflory Supper (which is Co much made on of fome) after the PalTeover, before the Lords Supper ,tor the fame purpofe? the excluding ludas from the Lords Sup- per ; they might indeed have done well to have nude a di- mifTory Supper of it, and difmilTed it, and let it go becaufe there is no crum or drop , word or fyllable of any fuch middle, or intervening Supper betwixt the PafTeover and the Lords Supper, in any Evangelift , and betides , {till fome of the Evangelifts have certified us of Iudas> not being excluded but admitted unto the Lords Supper. More parti- cularly, The lews at the time of the Palfeover, had three Supper?, their common, their Pafchal, their dimifforv, kept in thefame order as I have related: Sure if our Savi- . our Chrift kept any dimiffory Supper, he would either have kept after the iegall Palfeover, according to the lews, or af- ter the Evangelicall Supper, incorrefponden.y to that for- mer difmiflion of all the guefts together after the Feaft was over: for as for that, His keeping it, between the Legall PafTeover, and the Evangelicall Supper, it is but a fiction of their bra:n, deviled to fhutout ludas onely, eo.nrary to B b 2 the- i%6 fudds both ignorant and 'wicked, admitted. the feries and order of the things related, (JMath. 26.21. and 26. Where it is laid, and as they did eat, and as they were eat'.ng the Vaffeover , /ejus took^bread and blcjfed it , &c. clearly ihewing, that the inftitution and adminiftration of the Lords Supper, followed immediately upon and after the eating of the Paffeover, therefore he kept not the dimiffory Supper after the Paffeover immediately. Yea rather , if our Saviour Chrift kept any dimiflbry Supper at all (though it be not mentioned) and they will not yield it to have been after the Lords Supper, as proper- ly it Ihould, in correfpondencetothe lews manner of keep- ing fuch an one after their Paffeover ; why then, it muff be before the Paffeover Supper. For betwixt the Paffeover, and the Lords Supper, there was no other Supper, (as hath been fnewed ) and then it muff be one of thofe two com- mon Suppers? CMath. 26,1. which are laid to have been two dayes before the Feaft of the Pafleover>one mentioned there, and the other in John 15* and 22. becaule its (aidalfotobe before the Feaft of the Paffeover; and if fo, it will do them no good , for there is mention made of Indas his going otic > indeed and his covenanting with the High PrieitV ut t was a voluntary and folitary,going out alone by himfelf, not a dimillory departure, and from a common Supper, and that before the Paffeover, and therefore no- thing to their purpofe, and project, as who returned again tothePafleover, and there abode, as alfoat the Lords Sup- per, without any exition of his own, or difmiflion of Chrift, till the Suppers were finiftied , and the Hymne or Pfalm lung. And thus you.fee Sir, I have fhewed you my warrant for my admitting of fome wicked ones, and unworthy ones un- to the Table of the Lord (who will come though not wel- come) from the example of Chrift, who admitted of Indas thereto, who intruded himfelf, and came again to the Paf- feover, and the Lords Supper. I acknowledge, that I cannot, nor ought to conclude ex- clusively from the example of Chrift, to admit no more,and to adminiftcr the Lords Supper to no more than he did (for then I muft give it onely to men.) But inclusively I may ar- gue. J udas both ignorant and wicked \ admitted. \ 87 gue, That becaufe Chrift gave the Lords Supper to men onely, Therefore it is lawfuil to do the fame to a company contorting of men onely : and fo by the like inference, that becaufe Chrift gave the Lords Supper unto his family and houfhold, though made up of difciplcs, good and bad, /«- das himfelf not excluded by him, Therefore I may do the fame to my Parifh and Cotfuregarion , though mixt of members regenerate , and unregenerate, pious and impi- ous, righteous, and unrighteous and am not to bar up the way, or (hut out any out of doores. I fhall think of that which Chrift faith, Math.i0.i4. The difciple is not above h's mafler, nor the fervant above h-.s Lord: it is enough for the difciple, that he be as his mafker, and the fervant as his hord\ You cannot call us of his houfhold, Beelze- bub, for admitting the wicked and unregenerate unto the Table of the Lord, but you muft alCo call the mailer of the houfe, the Lord Jefus himfelf fuch, for admitting ludas un- to the fame ; and if you (hall call the mafierof the houfe Be- elz,ebub)how much more will you call them of his houJhold.lt is e- nough, ( well enough) for the difciple, that he be as his mafter, and it is enough, (ill enough) for you to traduce both mafter and difciple. And as for thofe nice and fubtle diftin&ions , which fome have devifed for the eluding and evacuating this truth of Chrifts admitting ludas unto his Sacra- mentall Supper, I confefle I do not well underftand, and leile approve them, as that he a&ed not here as mediatour, but as a Minifter, and fo he could not exclude Mas for that legally he could not be Iudge and witnefTe, and executioner himfelf: For my part, I think Chrift afted here, as both, as Mediatour by inftituting this Sacrament, and as Mini- fter, by difpenling of the fame, and boththefe, foclofely together, conjunctly and immediately, that, as it is faid of mans foul, that it is created at the infuiing of it? and in- fufed at the creating of it; (o I may fay of the Lords fupper, that it was inftituted at the adminiftration of it, and admini- ftred at the inftitution of it by one and the fame numericall and in'dividuall action : And fo Chrift, both as Mediatour, andaifo as Minifter admitted! of fodaszs a communicant 1 8 8 fffdas both ignorant and wicked admitted. at this Supper, inftituted and adminiftred at one > and the Tame time. And whereas it's faid further, that Chrift could not juridically exclude Iudas,becaufe asMinifter , he could not be both Iudge and witnefle legally, I anfwer ; i. That I finde Chrift fitting in the midft of the Do&ours of the Tem- ple, hearing , and asking them queftions , and giving them anlwcrs ; and like wife prefef^in the midft of therm two, or three gathered together in an AlTcmbly in his name, to prayer and invocation ; yea, and aflifting alfo Mofes Chaire, (as I may Co Cay) amongft the Scribes and Pharifees teach- ing, and inftruPneft , who by conference with them might ha-ve fiftied out the truth, and gotten proof, of that treafon plotted, that himfelf accufed iudas of two dayes before; or other wife (his Mediatour- fliip, joyning with his Miniftery) he could have made the conscience of Iudas (as a thoufand witnefles) to have confef- ied the fait ; or have caufed Satan himfelf, (who entrcd in- to Iudas, and fuggefted that villany into him) to come forth 2.nd accufe him (as he is the accufer, ) or he could have cal- led down for ionic of the Angel?, who were within hearing? to have been both witnefles, and as need fhould be, Execu- tioners, to have bound the man withouc the wedding Gar- ment, (Iudas) hand and foor, (and mouth too,) and ro have caft him out, and ejected him. Surely, fome, or other wav, Chrift ffadas both ignorant and wicked admitted. i g^ Chrift would have beftirred himfelf , to have kept of Iudas from Communicating with the reft of his Apoitles , before he mould have to intruded j if it had been utterly unlawful! to have admitted of Iudas, as a partaker of his Sacrament and Supper. But be it granted, Chrift as a Minifter did not (could nor, fay fome) exclude Judas , becaufe he would no; (could not be) both Accufcr, Judge, and vvitnelle) why then do you blame me,and (as it Were) (end out for procefle and warrant againffc me, for admitting people to the fam; Lords Supper? who are unregenerate, unrighteous, fcandalous,or ignorant, when as, though I may hear of them to be inch , (though Chrift knew Iudas to be fuch) I much more, cannot be either Judge, or vvitnelle herein. What ? would you have me a particular Minifter deny the Sacrament to the fcandalous , and unregenerate , un- known to me, and not convinced by you, when as Chrift himfelf the great, and publick Minifter of the Covenant and Church, denied it not to /#^j, a Traitour known to him- felf, and by him revealed and detected to one (atleaft) of the other Apoftles .? IfI(hould,I believe you would be as ready to clamour me for not admitting (as now you do for admitting,) and would be the fir ft Jew, to qu.ftion me, by what Authority do I this thing, and who gave m: this Au- thority. You, that qneftioned me but even now , for taking the fair, and peaceable courfe at the Law, for fuing for the reco- very of due Tythes,would much more clamour me,for ulmg any forcible,or turbulent way in the Gofpel , for the keeping of wicked intruders from the Lords Table ; efpecially, feeing all fuch as Church-Members, $t Gofpel-profelfours (thorg 1 but external) have a due Evangelical right (at leaft exter- nal) to the Sacramental Seals, as their pnviledges ; and no one particular private Minifter of the Gofpel , or Paftour of the Church hath any legal? or Evangelical power , or Iurif- di£tio:i to inhibitc,or reftrain them : Man^ who made me a Judge, or divider over them f Luke 12,14. And who made thee a Iudge, and ruler over m 4 A£t. 7. 27, And what have J to do to Judge them that are without i \ Cor. 5, 1 2. And whj dojjt thou Itidgs i go MiniHers no fudges of mens intvdrd worthinejft. Judge thy brother t Rom. 1 4. 1 o. Or why do ft thou fet at naught thy brother i We Jhatl all ft and before the judgement feat of Chrift. God hath indeed made us (not Iudges, or Lords over his Heritage) but Paftours of his people , but one of our Shep- heards ftavesythztot bands ismove broken than that other of Zach 117. beAMj&x. both are much alike defaced,disbeautified,and dil- banded: we know not how, nor have power to keep the Sheep from the Goates, or VVolves , Chrift hath made us ("not Commanders , arid SupervKors of other mens wills) but executours of his laft Will &c Teftament, and keepers of our brethren , but fo that we keep within the compafle of his Divine precepts , and our own Minifterial vocation. Shew me, I pray , a word oi precept from God, or a work of exam- ple in any of Gods Prophets, or Apoftles,or a power of ju- dicature, or fuch an acl: of that power,in any one (ingle Prieft or Minitter, to keep of from the Sacrament, or not to admit unto the Lords Supper, Pr of effors,or (if you will) Proteftants baptifed, and not excommunicate, As for that in X^'V. 1 3.3. where the Prieft 'sCommand- ed to look on the Leprous perton , and pronounce him un- clean, and to (hut outof the Camp, or Congregation: and that in 2 fflren, 26.20. where (for example)) Az,orlah the Prieft, and allthe Pr lefts looked upon Uzziah • and behold, he was Ltproui, and they thruft him out from thence, the Temple , and the 2Chr.t^i9.Andlchoi2.da. fet the Porters at the Gates ef the houfe of the Lord ,that none which was unclean in any thing- fhonld enter in: But let me firft give you,&: all the produccrst'of theie Texts of Scripture, for the not admitting the unclean* or the unregenerate to the Table of the Lord, this Caveat,to let thele Texts reft , and lye fttll, for that there is a High- Prieft in them all,leaftyourai(e a Hierarchical power a- again* Secondly, for anfwer to them, I fay, that they belong nothing to our Sacramental bufinefTe> which is general a- mongfl:Chr'(tians,inwhich,astotheexclufion of the wic- ked and unregenerate, particular Minifters have no rule?, or Comma ids given of God ; For that , of the two firft Texts, was a Lepritical cafe , peculiar, and (I may fay, almoft) na- tional to the lews , about which God gave the Priefts , and High- PrhAte Mimfters not to exclude from the Sacrament* \$\ High-Prieft efpecially, marks-of Tryal to go by, and to finde out that plague, and then alio power, and Authority to put the Lepers out from the Congregation. And as tor the third Text, and thofe others that fpeak of the unclean, (as there were divers forts of them,) their being fhut out of the Camp, or kept from the Palleover,fuch are but aliuuve, not conciu- five Scriptures, and may ferve to prelTe preparation 3c fan&i- ticadon unto the Sacrament , but not to ground a non-ad- mittance l or feciuding from the Sacrament ; ana brides, inch legal uncleanneffe could not , nor would have excufed, much leffe excluded a man, a kw, from Gods fervice? even the PaC[eover,but that there was an exprefle particular Law for the fame, which cannot be produced here, in this point of not admitting the wicked > or unregenerate unto the Lords Supper. Yea, fome legally unclean were alfo admit- , ted to the eating ofthePafTeover, as you may feeiVw#.9.io. 2 Qhren, 30. 1 5 . for this, to be legally unclean , was likewife incident to good men as well as bad ; and took not away, ei- ther the habitual worthineiTe of the Godly, or the relative worthinelle of any Member of that Church (though wic- ked,) onely the legally unclean were under a contingent neceflity of abftaining,by the will of God expreiled in'a par* ticular order, cr ordinance, fo that they could not obferve the Paileover , during that time of their uncleanneffe, but they fhould make the faerifice unclean, for fo by the will of God it was manifefted , and even enaited , that whatfoever they touched in their uncleannciTe ,(hould be unclean. But thirdly, Moral uncleannefle , (which is the matter in Quaere, or Queffion , 'twixt you and me) did not debar the lewes, their admittance unto the Pafkover,as you may fee by com- paring Ez,ra.6, 2 x. with the 9,&c ioth4Chapt. that there were many of the lews returning out of the Captivity, guiltv of Moral uncleanneffe, and yet all kept the PafTcover. The whole Church of the lews were tooblervethe PafTeover, fervice , and vvorfhip upon their lives , the which , when it was in itsbeft Eftate, had in it many, who were Morally un- clean ; and therefore you cannot deny, but the whole Chri- ftian Church is likewife as deeply engaged , to obferve the Lords Supper, Shew me fomething oat oi Mo fes, or the C c Pro: 1 9 2 Private reproof aud admonttion , Prophets were Come, or any, who were Morally unclean, (if.) wicked and unregenerate were not admitted to come 10 the PalTeover,and aiimkted notwithstanding to come to all other publick vvorftup, as Sacrifices and the reft then in life. And yet you would have me not to adnvt fuch to the Lords Supper, but yec to admit them to all other Divine fer- vicey as prayer and preaching : for you except nothing to the later, but onely to the firft. As for that in Math.6t-j:, Give not that which is holy unto 'DogSfitcUher cafiye your Pearle before Swine , leaft they tramp/e them under their feet , and turn againy and rent you, I much wonder that this Scripture (whether ot command or rather of Caution given by our Saviour Chrift) Ihould be by fome appropriated, or but applied, to the not admitting of the wicked, and unregenerate to the Lords Supper , feeing *c neither fpcaks to any Minifter properly, nor of the Lords Supper directly ; nor of any Difciples, or proftflburs, though wicked &od unregenerate, rcfpe&ively. cl . Hrft, Not to any Minifter ; for the twelve Apoftles were not yet called : theretore onely to thofe private followers and prefent auditors of his , who were at his Sermon on the Mount, was this Counfel, or Command given , whom he meaneth by, Ye .give ye not that. What ? Nor fecondly, dotn our Saviour fpeak of, or mean either particularly his Sacramental Supper, as which was not infti- tured (nor foretold ) untill three years after this time ; nor generally any ot his new Evangelical Ordinances and Ad- miniftrations ; for the old ones being ft 11 on foot, there were as yet no new ones come forth : and therefore he faith, That which (is) Holy, not which (jhallbc) Holy • nor doth he lay, all Holy things, for thofe private hearing perrons were not in a Capacity, becaufe not in Office, to difpence, and give out all Holy things j but it is, That which is Holy, fome one, or other Holy-thing is here fpoken of and meant, namely pri- vate reproof 'and admonition. For all the verles foregoing are Rules for perlons private reproving* as that they muft not have beams in their own eyes greater fins themfelve*, who are finding faults in others , and.fpying Moates in their brothers eyes : and fo this vcrfe followcth on with another 1 Rule Dogs, Swine, Infidels^ perfecutcurs eftk Church. 1 9 3 Rule about thepcrfons to be privately reproved, t he y mud not be Dogs and Swine.^ And the realon annexed is raoft appliable, and trequently incident unto private reproof : for very commonly the private perfon reproved, turns upon the private perfon reproving, and all, to Rents'him, with ill lan- guage, and fierce ufage, (launders, revilings, tearings , and rentings , (which are never done , upon the publick admhi- ftrationsof the Lords Supper S fuch I have received from you in your fheets of paper, before J caft any Pearle of private re- proof? or admonition before you » in this my anlwer ; and therefore now after I have given it you , I muft much more look for it. But as fob fa but respe- ctively and conditionally , in dependance upon, and in order from the Church, and the pubiick Guides and judges thereof; fo that if the ignorant and fcandalou? be not ceniured , or flmt out by them, or (in plainer EngLfh) excommunicated by them out of the field and folds of the fheep, and Church- Members ; for Dogs and Swine, I cannot exclude them the I Lords Supper , the right and priviledge of all Church-Mem- bers 5 becaufe they are held in? as fuch, by the juridical pre- vailing prek nt power. And therefore, not feeing allo,as the Hate and condition of things are, how any fuch power can eafily, or fuddenly come to be in force , or execution , I (hail not account of the worlt of my people, as Dogs and Swine, I (hall admit of them*as vifible Members in Covenant,to come to the Lords Table, and take the Holy things and Seals^and in fo doing, I am neither A&our nor Abettour to their un- worthy receiving, and do not fo much give the Holy things, as fufTcr them to take them; yea, fo far forth, as it is Gods will, no Member of my Congregation , though fcandalous and unrighteous (Viould publickly be denied his right and in* tereft to the holy things of God , by the will and pleafure of one lingular Minifter as my f elf , I do, and (hall willingly ad- m;t him : and when fome lawful! power and author ity doth cenfure and feparate him from the fame , as unworthy to hold Communion with the reft> I fhall as willingly difmifle him. I will very briefly return to that Command , x Cor. 5. 7. **. 1 3. which is urged to the contrary of admitting the wic- ked &: unregenerate unto the Lords Table: Purge out there- fore that old leaven,$tc. if any that is called a brother be a forni- catotiry or covetous^ or an Idolater , or a Railcr, or a 'Drunker d^ or Cc ^ w 1 2 6 Pubitcklj excmmnicAttd ml to fc dittoed. an Extortioner yWth fuch a one,nonotfeaty$iz, therefore put away from among ft your felves that wicked, ferfon, Firft, I obfervc the great difference of your , and the Apo- ftks temper of fpirit, about this matter of putting away from the Lords Table certain psrCons : you would have all re- moved that are not born of water and the fpirit, and hold not lorth the works olpiety towards God , aisd of righteotifnefle towards men. And others add , all ignorant perfons : but yon fee the Apoftle doth inftance onely in haynous, & fcan- dalous fins,and onedxh as is not Co much as named amongft the G- nti es, whereas thofe you mention are ordinary a- mopglt Chnltians. Yea, and the Apoftle faith, that he , that is called a bro- ther, may be any one of thole fcandalous Tinners, and any of fa:h icandalous tinn:r?,may be called (till a brother : where- as ycu would exclude, even the unregenerate and unrighte- ous, as from your private ,(o the .publick brother-hood and Communion, and herein (hew you are not of Pauls fpirit, nor in Pauls charity. 2. 1 will not puzzle you, as I could, to qusere of you,where the Supper of the Lord i; any where in tcriptnre, particu- larly cal.ed or ftiled, a Feaft> or where,when the word Eat, or Nor, (landing alone by it felf, is meant of the Lords Sup- per ? U rdy the Apoftle fp?aks here of eating in a civil fen(e, and of a friendly familiar, but unneceftary eating, which in- deed he would have us to withdraw from fuch fcandalou> brethren, as a means to (hame them, and Co to reform them : but yet upon our neceffary- occafions in our ordinary cal- lings, we may, as fet luch a work in our houfes ; fo fet fuch down at our Tables ; yea , and (it down of our felves , and eat with them h yea, and if we may eat with fuch upon fuch occafion, why then alfo at the Lords Table, and Supper, this alfo being a neceftary duty, to which both, and all forts of profcftingChriftian? and Church-Members (which even {candalousfinners are, untill legally caft out) are related and obliged ; and the woift of Members are not to fl-'ght, or ne- glect ir,as not the other duties of the publick worthip. The Argument then Hence made, that we may not eat with the fcandalous at the Lords Supper , becaufc we may noK Publickly excommunicated not to be admitted* i$y not eat with them at our own meals, it proves no (taffe to lean upon* but a reed falling to the ground, upon the very pretlingof ir, for I have (hewed that, i. Generally we may eat, and not eat with fuch, and therefore from either of thole terms alone j can be no confequence. a ..We may eat with the fcandalous upon neceffary occahons, civil, or facred,and fuch a one is the Lords Supper, to all Church- Members, un- til! they be put out authoritatively from Church Mcmbcr- fhip. For then indeed, leffe fOciety in civil, and (acred things, is to be allowed unto the excommunicate then to the fcan- dalou '. Otherwife Church cenfures were fuperfluous , and to no puupjfe, if we were as much bound to withdraw Com- munion from the one as the other, in either fellowship ; I mean from a brother under Church Toleration and indul- gence, as from a brother under Church excommunication, and feventy. 3. When all is faid that can be faid,& as much made of it as may be , it will amount to no more bur this. The Apoltles (harp reproving of the Church of fir.nth, their finfull negle£t, and connivence in not catting out by excom- munication, that inceftuous perfon. This was that old leaven, that leavened the whole lump , SC toured their Communion > namely their careleffe, and fintull toleration of him, which, he advifeth them to purge our,having ftrong Phyfickenough in their hands to do it , a power of Church cenfures , that of excommunication ; Sc therefore the Apoftle £ts them about it, and joyns withthera in the preparing, and tempering ir, and fo it was done immediately. But what is all this to your warranting, and clamouring of me,foradm;ttingunregenerate and unrighteous Members, (a great deal better then fuch fcandalous and notorious fin- ners as are mentioned here ; yea , (fuppofe it) even fcanda- lous : when as it is not my negle£t of duty, or connivence at them to permit it, but it isdefe&of power and impotency, to remedy it: and my Church is in no fuch capacity, to deal with (inners juridically and authoritatively, as the Church of fori»th was, and the Minifters thereof. I do not finde in all the whole Chapter any Line,or Word to thispurpofe of St. Paul, blaming the Minifter &C Mates of that Church of £V/«fc,for admitting the inceftuous per* fon, i g'S Publhkly excommunicated not to be Admitted. fon, or other fcandalous, unto the publick Ordinances, and the Lord s Supper, oC eatjbecaufe he was not feparated from the Congregation by the publick power of that Churches cenfure rAfid if before this-, and without this , there had been any lawfull way,for that Minifters not admitting of him, or- any diffident warrantable remedy , or means in that Minifters hands to have excluded him, St. Paul would have reproved him for not making ufeofit,and patting it into ex- ecution : Yea , if there had been any other expedient, or p rge (as i may L> fay) befides this of excommunication in the hands and power of the Minifter, (as there is not.) It would have been called tor by the Apoftle, or if the Apoftle himfelf had underftood any thing of any other rule, or reme- dy for a private Minifter to walk by, and to ufe in this cafe ol not admitting the fcandalou?, he would have touched up- on it, and cxprclfed his minde thereabout1.'. Whereas pat- ting by the Mmiltcr of firinth , his admitting of the inceftu- ous,an and tolerating fuch fcandalous perfons at the Lords Supper ; tell them to their faces, what you told me behinde their backs, in thefirftleafof yourfirft theet, that there is npne of Chrifts Church, all or the moft of them little bet- ter Vullickly txcommunicAttdmm be admitted 199 ter then Devils a Church made up of hypocrites, &c, and never leaveclaimingand clamouring of them, declaiming and exclaiming againft them, till you have gotten from them? a full power and authority to excommunicate from being Church-members, all our fcandalous pcrfons, any that is called a brother^ being a Fornicatour, or covetous, or an Idola- ter^ or ara'der fipray be fure, you renumber your felf,fo as not to iorgec or leave owuthe Rader^or a drunkard. And then I will allure you,and you may be lure of it?l w'ui admit to the Lord* Supper none of them all (before they have reformed themfelves,and given good teftimony thereof? and fo good iatisfa&ion unto you and the congregation) and with fuch §nes no not to eat. But you will fay,this power &c matter of excommunication may be long procuring, and never obtained in this Church. In the mean time, I, by admitting the unregenerate and wicked, and the fcandalous, dofcandall, or Scandalize the regenerate, and godly, and inoffenfive, who are grieved and offended at their pretence. But how can I help it ? in .1 King. 6.j6.atld 2,7* There ty'.ed a woman untojehoram^ help my Lord^ O Kingyand he [aid If the Lord do not help thee, whence jhall I helpsthee ? out of the barn-fljory or out of the wineprejfe, ii the Higher powers of the Church do not here help, to fe- peratethe one from the other, the fcandalous from the god- ly, the regenerate from the wicked? how lhall I help it ? out of an unwarrantable authority, or out of an impetuous zeal? if you cannot away with mixr communions , why then I m' ft away with all communions, and have none at all; and what a (candal'l will this be to the godly and. regenerate, in the wants and weakneffes of their taith and grace, to be deprived ofthepubiick ordinance appointed for the confir- mation and increafe of the fame ? may they not juftly be offended thereat? yea, will not you be offended and fcan* daiiled hereat, (as others of the feperation are) who tell us, and obje£t to us, and our Church, the want of a Sacra- ment, this Sacrament of the Lords Supper (as you charge us with an excefle of the other Sacrament of Baptifme) and thereupon twit us with a lame, maimed, incompleat , no Church? and may not the weaker Chriftian take offence, at D d having 2oo Scandals when given > er not given, havirig no facramcnt ot the Lords Supper with us,and there- upon make it an occafion of going over to you, and your fide, where they may have it upon as cade terms. But the greateft fcandali would be done to the ho ly Sa- crament itfelf, which by this means of a generall omiflion ot k or non-ad miffion to it, would be even fleighted and let at nought, vilified and delpifed. Thus if I fhould admit of none unto the Lords Supper, for the avoiding of the fcandalous and unregencratc, ] fhould g vethete fcandals my felf otherwife, and that actively, a? which do tknv and follow naturally and kindly from the fame, that is, fuitably and agreeably unto it. Formynon- admifllon isaptof it felt to produce, and likely to occafion the above mentioned fcandals and offences. Whereas in the other fcandali or offence of my admitting of mixt mem- bers, and fo alio the unregenerate and wicked, (having done mv endeavour to prevent their coming, and to keep them off hy lawfull and warrantable waves within my cal- ling) I am but paffive in it, and it comes onely by acci- dent, I do not culpably occafion the fcandali, or the fall of others into fuch offence. They iinfully and through their own default take occafion thereby to be offended ; for in this I do but perform a commanded duty, in dilpenfingofa neceffary ordinance of God, whereas in the other there is fome neglect and omifsion of the fame. You may read for full fatisfa&ion in this point of fcandali taken, and not gi- ven, Math, i 5.1 1. John 6m\6t \ Cor. i.i 3. And this alfo may ferve to take offche fcandali is laid upon the Minifter, in regard of the unregenerate and fcandalous, as if the admitting them to the Lords Supper, were the caufeof their hurt and harm, their eating of damnation to themfelves, and guikineileof the body and blood ot Chrift, their defiling and polluting of the holy ordinance, and the godly communicants: (for fo I will pu c all the odences to- gether ) and I anfwer that I am not acceffary to any or thefe harms or hurts , nor guilty of any of thefc offences or fins. For having done my beft to my power, for the preventing of their coming to the Lords Supp:r, eidier by dilTwading them from their fins, -admoniflaing them of the danger of comin g Httrt to the wicked M the Sacrament, whence. 201 coming in thai: fins unrepented of, by inftru£ting them in themyftery, to make them worthy, I muft do that part of my Paftorall duty and office, which is to difpenle the pub- lick ordinance of God; whatsoever the event or iiTue there- of may be to fome through their default. What if the Jews fome of them did not believe, Shall their unbelief rvalue the word of God without effect } what if the wicked receive the hurt, and ncreafe their wickeneffb through their own default (which cannot be prevented by me through others default ) Shall their wicked nefle and hurt make the godlinefle and good of the worthy Receiver of none cffc£t, or fruftrax ? For m/ par:, my care is ro prepare, and make worthy Communicants, all the mem- bers of my Church, (to which purpofe I have preached this half year to them, wholly of the nature> ule, effects, of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper,andof the way and means ofpreparingthemfelvesforit, audi intend to catechife yet another half year of the fame matter.) If poflibly I may, I would Cave thofe that hear me ; but it is impofsible, but offences will come •• where therefore I cannot keep off tares, (and I may not pluck them up from the wheat) I will labour as a go jd husbandman, that both may grow together? and flourifh together by adminiftring to both alike, but if thetare^ do by their own default fall down to the ground, and lie flat and wither, yet the wheat muft be, though in the midft of them, fuccoured, upheld, and ftrengthened, and I will be more encouraged ftid to the difpenfation of the heavenly dews , and rai >s , Irom the great and invaluable goodland.bencfit redounding unto die wheat, than as yet I can be difcouraged from it, upoii:the evil events and i flues following unto the Tares. PlainlVs and in a word, the harm of the wicked, is pro- perly, and morally from their linfuil corruption, and evil difpofition, and not at all from the admifljon of them, or Adminiftrationtothem, (unleffe accidenuhy or eveutual- iy)and there it will be but a very weak -dad insufficient argu- ment for me to forbear the Sacrament* For fo by the like reafon I muft give over my preaching and not admit fuch :o the word;, becaufe it alio is to iome fuch a favour of death. D d 2 But 202 Hurt to the wicked At the Sacrament whence. But the benefit of the godly thereby is an invincible and concludent Argument for my adminiftrauon of the Lords Supper unto them, (notwithstanding the harm of the wick- ed, whothruftin amongftthem, and intrude unavoidably againft their and my will) The which if I fhould deny or put by. I mould be a culpable (caudal to them, and a moral caufeoroccafion of their evil of loffe and damage. But yet( before I leavethi-)I fhall tell you,what I believe you know not, thatthe Corinthians, their eating anddnnking of damnarontothemfelvcs, and fo their guiltinefle of the body and blood of Chrift, lay not upon their unwonhineile habitual! or perlonall, upon their being before unregene- rate and wicked perions, as in your words* upon their being ignorant and fcandalous, as in other words, but according to the Apoftles fenfe, upon their prophane carriage and dil- orderly behaviour there, being drunken there manifeftly> and thereupon, more out of intemperancy than ignorance, not*di(eerning the Lords body, they received it as common and ordinary Bread and Wine, and thusitmaketh nothing for your purpoie againft me, who never admitted any fuch to the Lords Supper; never any fuch ( I believe) came to the Lords Table, in mine, or any other Church with us, as who come to the fame foberly> reverently, and dilcerning- ly,approving and apprehending of the elements of Bread and Wine, as the reprefentations of Chrifts Body and blood, and means of fomeipirituallfood, and good to their fouls; and therefore though they may be unregenerate or perfo- nally unworthy beforc,cannor in the Apoftles fenfe be faid to be guilty of the Body and Blood oi Chrift, or to eat and drink judgement to themlelves, really in the nature and ufe of it (fo it is the cup of bleftng and bread of ftrength) but onely accidentally and through fuch abufe and prophanati- on of it ; whereupon God inflicted judgement and mortali- ty upon them , the Corinthians, even as Kings do adjudge rhofe guilty of Treafon againft their perfons, who vilely andcontemptuoufly abufe and diigracc their feal or picture : So alwayes the indignity offered, to the thing rejativeor re- prefentativc, reflects upon the original it felf. But if fuch be not guilty of the Body and Blood of Chrift, yet Hurt to t be wicked at the Sacrament whence. 2 o •, yet they pollute the Bread and wine, and fothe Sacrament whom I admit, the unregenerate an J wicked: as a little lea- ven leaveneth the whole lump, I Cor.5. This is With much eafe antwered ; tlv* Apoftle there doth not blame the Mini- fter or people for communicating with the inccftuous perioo, as if they or their Raft there (pokeuoi, (wh.'ch is not the Supper or the Lord ) were defiled thereby, but chides the Church, Ke the Guidesand officers, for not excommunica- ting of him, out of their finiullconnivanc«and indulgences this was the old leaven that leavened their communion,their tolerationoi luch a fcandalous brother ,not the others admil- lion ofhim to the Communion, which thef'e could not avoid till they purged him away by their authority ,(o thefe were rather polluted and defiled by their negligence and carelef- oeffe than the other by their ad million and communion with him, for the private Minifter and people, -who mourn for what they cannot mend. Saint Paul blames them not for communion with that fcandalous perion before he was put out, nor intimates they muft abftain, till he was put out,, (no word nor fyllable in all the Chapter to fuch purpole.) I confefle it is truc,the wicked and fcandalous are as leaven ,in the quality of it, and may hurt the godly, as the leaven fowreth meal but not in the equality ot it. Leaven neceila- rily fowreth the meal, but the wicked do not fo , the godly r the Pharifees Doctrine is called leaven too, but all that heard it were not tainted therewith* for then our Savour Chrift would not bid the people to hear them, every M;- nifter membermuft looktohimfclfto keep himfclf uu{pot- ted and undefiled,guarding his.own fpirit withlear,faith, hu- mility, doing his belt to fecure himfelf,and to reclaim the wicked fellow member, or to remove him ; which having done? and uied all lawfull means of prevention , they arc no wayes polluted by his coming,company,or communion; It is to himfelf(as the* Apoftle faith)that he eatcth judgement and concrað pclli t but even their minde and confidence is defiled, to the defiling all things to themfelves,but D d 3 no- ' — ■% 204 tf * hurt to the wicked from the Miniflir Admitting. nothing to the pure, to whom all things arc pure, or purify- ing; even the impure thcmfelvcs , as being accidentally , or occafionally means of their better, and further purifying thcmfelvcs. The juit fhall live and feed by his own faith, not ftaive and dye by anothers infidelity : neither doth a ftinking breath, or foul ftomack, fitting with another, who hath a clean ftomack, and a fweet breach, (though offen-* five perhaps to him, and whom he would avoid if he could* J any way taint him, and make him to favour ill. Let me ack yor, doth your prefence, or the pre fence of any • your melt regenerate and godly ones, doth it fandifie the unregenerate and the wicked at all ? or the Sacrament any thing more in it felf ? why then mould the prefence of thele defile you, or the Sacrament ? rather of the two, I think the prefence of the godly doth fandifie them the ungodly, like as the Apoftle faith, I Cer.j.l^' The unbelieving husband is fanttified by the wife • and the unbelieving wife is fanttified by the husband, sc therefore as the believing husband,or wife (hould be willing to dwell with, and not to leave the unbelieving wife, or husband ; fomay you and other regenerate and un- godly be content to communicate with the unregenerate, SC not to feparate from themjwhat knoweft thou,0 godly man, whether thoufhalt fave the ungodly man?and what knowelt thor,0 regenerate man, whether thou fhalt fave the unre- generate by words, initruStion , example , life? How- ever ,you have no warrant from the word, or example of Chrifr,or his Apoftles,to make your feparation from the publick Ordinances, (which are prefcribed both oi you,and all external Members and ProfefTours)upon a pretence of fin- full polluting mixtures, no more than the other eleven Apo ftles did withdraw thcmlelves from the Lords Supper,becaufe ot Judas prefence upon a furmifeof his polluting that com- mon Ordiiianc;-,inltituted for him and them the vifible Di- fciplcsofChnft. In a word,and that more diftinctly : The prefence 8£ recei- ving of the wicked & unrcgeneratc,the ignorant,or fcanda- lous doth not pollute,or prophane the Lords Supper in tlelf, and intrinfecally-for this isonely when the Ordinance it fclf is corrupted , and carried on directly aga;nfr ,and contrary to (Thrifts No hurt to the wicked from the Mimfltr Admitting. 205 Chrifts order and inftitution,as in the Popilh made, where o;ie of the Elements is fu'odu&ed from the peopie,and the other is adored by them : and thus, whosoever partake of the Sacra- ment fo corrupted, though he bea godly? and regenerate mandodiin the very partaking oi it, (as the Minifter like- . wife doth in the very adminiftring ol it) fin, and pollute ic, becaufe they both violace C-rifb holy order and infticu- tion. But what is this to the purpofe , feeing with us the Lords Supper is both adminiftred and partaked, according, and agreeably to the Came holy order and inftitu'.ion , and there- fore is nor, cannot be, polluted inwardly , or elTcntially in it felt , by any wicked pretence, or mixture of perfons. What then tuefe do, or may pollute, iveminfecally,and to them- felves onely; to whom indeed, for want of their due qualifi- cations of knowledge , repentance , faith > and that through their own default, the Sacrament becomes a fin, and a pro- phanation unto them; like as the other ordinances, that of the word is a Savour of death as is Laid, and thatofp:ayer, is an abomination as the Pfalmift faith. The which is no Way infectious to the ordinance difpenced,which abides pure and holy ftill in it feH,nor prejudicial! to the godly partaking with them, who come prepared, nor chargeable upon the Minifter diftributing to them, as who cannot remedy ir according to his place, and therefore doth not partake withchemiu their fin and prophanation, nor depureor de- file himfelf. They are therefore too hot brain'd, and cool liver'd who urgethatText, 1 "t'tm. 5.22. againft the adminiftring the Sacrament to an uaregeneratc, or a wicked perfon; Be not partakers of other mens Jin x, $eep thy felf pure, True indeed, I that give him the Sacrament, am partaker of a nothers receiving, phyfically as it is a naturail Action '•> but morally, as it is a hnfull Action, I am not partaker of hisunworthi- nelTe of receiving, for I a£r and cooperate noth:ngthat is inductive of his finfull adlion of unworthy receiving, but 'do rather to the contrary, what 1 may by warrant and commiflion from the word, to prevent ir, by inltnxtion, admonition, &c, and therefore I am onely paflivehere,and Cufo 2 o6 Mtnifters have no power tofeparate vile from pretious. tuffcr what I cannnot hinder, their coming and receiving may b:a burthen to my Ipirir, but no wound to my con- fcience,it may be my grief and vcxat:on,;t cannot be my (in and tranfgrefiion, who have not the power of discipline or jurifdi&ion in my hand; to execute: if fo, and I ihould neg- lect it, then indeed I fhould be partaker of others fin in that way, and may not keep rcy (eif pure, I pray Sir. You that fo Quaere me for admitting to the Lords Supper pcrlons before they be born again of water and the fpirir, and hold forth works of pety and righteoufncirc, are you willing and content, that I, (and other Miniftcrs folely and fingly by themfelve 0 ftiould have fuch a power and autho- rity to (hut and exclude from the Sacrament all the unrege- nerate and unrighteous? you mult grant me the power of not admitting and excluding, or die why do you lay the blame upon me for admitting and intcrtaining fuch? Then you muft look to your felf, and demean your felf better to your mother Church, or elte your Minifter may begin with yon, whoareanunregenerateRailer, and an unrighteous reviier of her, and Lb (hut and exclude you fii ft; as from the Lords Supper •• fo all other priviledgesof the Church. If fo, then I muft tell you, you are willing and content to that, which is againft the command of Chrift, and the example of his Apoftle, ( i thing I thought you had more minded, becaufe you often mentioned to me the fame) as you may fec> Math.iS. 17. 1 .Cor.5.3.and a Cor.3^6, Yea you will fmell as rankly of die Pope and Iefuite in this point, (as you do in divers other >)if you can or wiil make the keyes of theKingdomeof heaven, and the power of excommu- n'.ca ion? to belong fingly and folely to Peter, which were given to the Apoftles joyntly. Yea more, againft your will and meaning, you muft turn Paraftte and flatterer to me and other Miniftcrs, in hanging thofe keyes at mine, and every Miniftcrs girdle, and put- ting fuch power into mine and every Miniftcrs hand, or elfe I and other particular Miniftcrs, muft turn Profelytcs and followers of you, and prefumptuoufly ufurp to every one of us the power of jurisdiction, as you do to your felf the autho- rityof miniftration. And Mimfters have no fewer t« feparate vile fr$mf Miens. 207 And yet one thing more muft be too, you mud be willing, that, as God took^ of the fpint of (JMofes , and gave unto the feventy Elders'. Sohefhould (I will not (ay, takeofyo\ir(pi- -^ r ric which you have acknowledged, is bucfo far as man can * ' judge, ana that is not fat enough, as to this matter of judg- **>' ing of the unregenerate , or regenerate, the righteous, ot the unrighteous.) Take of Jeremft fpirit, ana put it upon every one of us, enabling ot us , to ieparatc the vile from the precious, to (ingle out the regenerate, and to pafle by the un- regenerate : and in this alio you fliail be willing to more than God ordinarily is willing, who will not give his glory unto another, Whofe glory it is, to fearch the heart, and try the reins^ Jer, 17.10. and judge the Ipirits ; and whofe gloiy it will be, to feparate at latt the flieep from the Goates, the regenerate Irora the uu- generate, the righteous from the unrighteous. I fhould not fiave thus again fpoken, and added to you, if you had ufed the ordinary words, of grofly, ignorant and fcandaloufly wicked, who are nfually the (ubje£t of theque- ftion of admitting, or not adm tting ,and of whom a man may judge farther and better, than of thofe ungenerate and unrighteous ones, you Quaere me for admitting, who mould be excluded : Here, your (fo far as man can judge,) is ne're awhit at all, and io never the nearer. You may put all you fee into your eye, and fee never awhit the better , and judge as far as you can, and dilcerne never the more of this object of regeneracy, or unregeneiacy. Andlo, I hope, Sir, you willatla(f,and hereafter excufe me for admitting fome perfons to the Lords Supper before they be born again of the water &£ thefpirit,at leaft,fo far as man can judge • and exempt me from guilt of titi in my (elf, or partaking ofothet mens (in in unworthy receiving until! theKeyes, which are now hung afide, (ufpended Sc excom- municate (as I may fo (peak) from the Church , and the true &: proper owners of them,through the prevalency of a mul- titude of Schemes and Sector the prevailing of the fancies, and factions of the multitude , as alfo by reaion of Autho ky not iutcrpofmg for it: The Keyes, (I fay) be rendred and re- ftored into right hands , who may lawfully, will relolutely, and do effectually (hut out irom the (aid Ordinance , all pro- phane , and fcandalons approachers,and receivers. E e But ■ o g Particular tryd And examination not commanded. But if all before will not excufe me from your qperuious Quaere, and exempt me from tin, of admitting the uniegene- race, Tpray Sir, advife me, what you would have me do ; I (hall be wiling to advife with you>fo long as you will keep to the right Rule of all good Counfel, the written word of G,;d : I know what you will advife me. Namely, ro take a particular Tryal and examination of every one, and whom 1 finde thereupon to be un regenerate and unrighteous, or ignorant and fcandalous , to put them by, and to fufpend them from the Lords Supper, But I mull: now Qjxre you firft ,and ask you, what War- rant have you for this, from the word of God , or from the example of Chrift, or his Apoft ies ? I finde it otherwife, La* went .3.40. Let uifearch and try ourwaj/es yand turn again to the Lord: fo the Prophet hath it, and even fo the Apoftle, ? Cor,i 3.5. examine your [elves ^whether ye be in the faith, prove your oven [elves , (whether ye be born of water and the fpirit.^ Yea ^m that very place, and at that very time, where, and when the Lords Supper was much abufed and prophaned, and the Apoftle purpofely wrote to them about ir,to reprove and to rectifie it, he laith onely thus, 1 Cor. 11,28. But let a, wan examine himfelf , and [0 let him eat of that breadyand drinkjof that cup^and again, wr/« 31. if roe would judge our [elves y we foould not be judged. I fee the Apoftle prcfleth hard for felf- examination, and judging? and iayeth the burthen upon eva- ry mans back , who comes to the Lords Supper, (that he may come worthily.) But I do not obferve him, urging Mimfterial examination and judging of the finmhians as his duty pre-requilite , and of that neceflfcy in order , to that Sacrament, and the Com- municant?, that unkfle this be done, and thofe can approve themfelves to him to be regenerate, and to be worthy , they muft not be admitted, or if they be, they eat and drink un- worthily , and their Minifter is like wife partaker of their fin. Again, look into ail the Evangelifts, who relate our Sa- viours order of inftuution>.and his example of Adminiftra- tion ; where doth he command ,or did he practile , this his M;niftenal examination, you require fo ftn&ly, with, or up- on Self examination neceffary. 209 on his Apoftles, before he gave them the Sacrament , about their particular Eftares , whether they were regenerate or no, or what meafure of knowledge they had, or what parti- cular fins they lived in ? yea,Chrift rather ordercth the mat- ter fo, as to put them upon it, and to give them occafion to Learch, and examine every one themfelves, when he caft ouc this word amongft them, {.one of you [hall bur ay »;?,)Math. 2 6. And (o they prefently tell upon ir, laying, Lord , who is it ? yea, every one ol them {aid,** it Ii Judas himfelffaid,'Mafter is it If Truely one would have thought, here was a juft oc- cafion given them, of trying and examining one another, of finding and proving their mailer having fpoken fo indefi- nitely and generally, naming none. One of you (hall betray me : I looked to have heard them appealing one another, fiftingand diving one into another, art not thou the man-; or fare thoti art the man, thoti Judas be are ft the purfe, and love ft mo- ney , have mot yon (Covenanted to betray our Atafter for meney i you grudged when time was y at the box of oyntment powred on our (^Mafters head, and counted it a needleffe wafte^what was beftowed xfon him ^ it may be, you have plotted his death to five charges, and to go away with the bag* It is not likely, Peter, J ames, or Iohn , would dofuch a thing-, who werefo carefull and tender of their Mafter, that when the Sa- mar'tans would not receive, or intertain him, they would have cal- led for fire down from Heaven , as EHas did, to have confumed them. But here is no fuch matter, but every one examineth and queftioneth himfelf » Mafter isnli Nay » John himfclf , to whom onely,as leaning on his breaft, Chrift made known after, Iudas to be the man, concealed him,fo far from profe- cuting, appealing, and judging of him, that he not k> much as revealed him to the other Apoftles $ iuch was the modeft , and humble,and charitable temper in the Apoftles ; (uch was the meek, lowly, and loving prattile of Chnft : And would you have me proudly? and arrogantly ufurp to my fell an Authority, to examine, and try all my NeighbouiF,whecher they be regenerate, or no, before I admit them to the Lords Supper ? and if they refufe to come under fuch tryal , or' co- ming under, approve not themfelves fuch, or other wife luf- E e 2 ficicnr, * i o Puff oral examination reqniftte where it ma) he . fkient, as I fhall think, to pafle by them, and leave them out as cxcommunicable. (There is a New light indeed,) though, they are not, noi can be excommunicated ; I (hall not fol- low your evil Couniel herein (if you give me no better) as- knowing it will be more magisterial than minifterial for me to do, and a bold part in whomsoever eife, (and a precedent of pernkiou; confequence in thefe times , wherein there is none to make appeal unto in this cafe,) to put Church-mem- bers back from the Lords Supper, who are in pofldlion of rheir right thereunto accordbg to Law , before their de- feats, or exceffes , I mean their unworthineffe, an i fins, be evidently, and legally prove J, and fo they authoritatively, and lawfully removed. This would be to prefume upon (in our felves, under colour of cenfuring,andpunilhing fin in others, and to walk diforderly and uncomely, to bring in or- der and comelineiTe into the Sacrament? or in the Ap jftles words, to do evil, that good m*y come of it , of which you may fe:, what the Apoftle think?, 'Agm,^ 8, I Ipeak not this, as if felf-examination fhoul d, or did in it (elf exclude all paftoral examination, as needlefte , and inef- fectual : For I acknowledge fuch mutual,and difcreet Soul- Searching, and examining difcourles, and conferences be- twixt Paftour and people, might be utefull and beneficial (if ""condefcended to by them, or we authorifed thereto) unto a more profitable, and better receiving of the Lords Supper, becaufe a fuller,and clearer apprehennon of the myfteiy,and preparation thereunto might enlue hereupon. And there- fore, if my people will either voluntarily offer thcmfelves unto me for any tryal and examination ; or will admit rea- dily of the fame, upon my tender thereof , I fhall cheerful-' ly undertake the work, and asthefervant of the Lord mull nor, I fhail not ftrivc,or contend with them, but be gentle unto all men and women, apt toTeach^patienty (to hear them) in meek»effe inftruUing thofe that oppofe , in nvldneile pofiilg them, who are willing to learn, ufingmodelty and modera- tion, both to ignorant and Scandalous , (if any iuch,) if Cod per adventure will givrfhem {faith and) repentance to the acknovt- ledging of the truth j and that they may recover themfelves out of thefnare of the Dcvii ',fif any be taken captive by him at his Will Pafloral examination reqtriftte where it may be, ' 2\i W'll) and (o come worthily to eat of that bread and drinkjjfthzt w ine^ decerning the Lords body and bloodfa fo,as it is Rom, I4.1 . and fym.if.i* Him (or her) that is weak^ift faith Ifoallrcceivey bat not to doubt full d'jpatatiotts ; nor (hall I lay heavy burdens upon the peoples backs grievous to be born,bu. Inch miik as they are able to bear , they (hall have. And if any be fit for ftronger mear,th:y (ball not want that ; rve that are ftrong , ought t? bear the infirmities of the weakly and not topleafe oar felvcs. But now looking upon the preterit temper of our Church* that legally, and authoritatively this tryaland examination of people by the Paftour cannot be had and taken; as alio upon the averfe difpoficion of our people, who willingly and readily will not tubmit unto the fame : Knowing alio,. that our Paftoral power is ouely private, arbitrary, and precari- ous not publick, judicial, and authoritative, to compel peo- ple to come in to it, before their receiving the Ljrds Supper, or to debar them upon their refufal, I will even do as the King going to war, in the 1 4ch. oiLuke , I will lit down fnft, an J confultwithmyfelf, (feeing you can give me no better advife,) yea, with the wife Steward in this, Jam lefolved what to do , for the Lord hath taken from me (as all fingle. Minillers) his Cenforfhip,or Judgefhip^to admit none but re- generate and righteous ones to the Lords Supper, I cannot, and to fhut out ail thefe, becaufe the unregenerate and un^ righteous are, and will be amongft them,l am afhamed ,yea, afraid. This I will do then 5 1, will deliver unto all my Congrega- tion the whole Counfel of God about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , the nature, ufe, efleds , and benefits of the fame, together with the matter and manner of their worthy preparation thereunto^ Iihalilikewife exhort them to ex- amine themfelves about their knowledge of this my fiery to proteffe it, about their repentance of fins to renew it; about the evidence of their faith to clear it : 1 fhall warn the difor- derly, rebuke theicandalous, admonifh the ungodly, laying before them the evil, and danger of their unworthy, and un- difcerning eating, and drinking there, forewarning them a- forehand to judge themlelyes,^_/Z^/^w! the wrath to come,. £ e 3 and 21* PaJIoral examination requifite jvhere it may be. and the \udge?nent to follow thereupon^ to bring forth fruits wor- thy amendment of life ; as an Ambairadour ot Chrilf, I fhall pray them in Chrifvs jlead^be you reconci ted unto God , and as their Oratour, I fhali pray for them unco God , that the) may be filled with the knowledge of his will, in all xvlfdom and fpiritual under (banding , and that he would fanttifie a precious people to h'mfelf and his jervice i Thus I will endeavour to inlhuct the ignouanr, and reform the fcandalous,and fo take away the iubjeft of the queftionSyea,andthelubje£t of your Quxre. For hereby,^ the word of Gad they may be born again of that incorruptible fcedy the fp'rit, i Pet. i. 23, So my bletled Sa- viour went before me, who before he gave to Judas the Sa- crament, told him fmartly of his fin, and denounced the woe, and judgement ready to iollow thereupon ; and chough the Scripture mentioneth not any particular inftru&ion given by (Thrift aforehand to the other Apoftles , abou: the Supper (like as it doth about the Paileover,) y:t the present words of his inftitucio'n and administration of the fame, coming from frch a mcafuie of die Divine {pirir, never man (peaking like that man, were fo quick and mightv in operation , that thefe afforded unto them what was lufficient, andnccciTary for their worthy eating and drinking. But, our times are more evil and finfull than thofe primi- tive ones, and our people more biinde and dull, than thofe Apoftle^, and we Minifters have but a pittance of the fpinr, to that our Savi jar had therefore we muft now preach to our people, to, and again, in feafon, and out ot feafon , be- fore, and at the Sacrament (for even a preparative to the Sa- c ramenr there woukTbe, as there was to the Paileover) and all little enough to make ready both Minifter and people , fit gircffs for the Lords Table. Now, Sir, when all this is done by me (though when all this is done* and much more, I mu(f,and (hall fay (till , I am but an unprc fitable favant, I have done m more than I ought, and fall far fhort of that too) I mean, when I have thus done my duty man Lvangclical fenfe,I (hall (whatfo- cver you haveQran ied to the contrary admit my pcopx unto the Lords Supper, in a good and charitable; yea, warrant- able hopr, that they are endued with fomc competent mea- fure P after al examination reqitifttejvhere it may be 213 fure of knowledge to difcern the Lords body and bIouJ,with lonie reasonable meafure of faith to believe in Chr ift Cruci- fied, that they are alfopofleiled of feme humble and peni- tent thoughts of their fins and unworrhinefle, of fome high and reverent apprehenfions of the worth of Cftrifts death and pafiTioii) and the benefits, though i dcrnor fummon them ail to appear before me, and by a rigide , and (evere tryal, and examination take a particular cognilance of the aiore- faid qualifications as, whether they hold forth the rvorkj of piety to Gody andr:ghteo?4fnej[s to mentor whether they be born again of water and the fpirit. But if you approve not what I have laid, I yield too much untc you, more than I need. Shew me, where ever in a con- ftituted Church, embracing, and holding the found Do- ctrine, and wholefome word of Chrift, any Member thereof bapt'fed,and continuing in Union with it, and in feilowfrbip of profeflion and worfhip of Chrift, was ever denied, and put byparticipating of the Sacramental Seales by a (ingle Mini- ft"er,for want, or upon refufal of Miniiterial examination ; or where ever aMinifter having done what lieth iu him to keep of the fcandalous, was thought, or made partaker of fin, for admitting fuch unto the Lords Supper , as were not byl^gal tryal , and Juridical examination pronounced unworthy, and fo [equeftred from Communion with Church-Mem- bers? Or where for the avoiding, and (hutting out of the unregenerate, ignorant , and (candalous. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is wholly and totally to be forborn, and fet aude by a private Mmifter as to the reft of the better Members, untill there be publick Officers and Judges fet up*, and impowred to take a tryal, and make a feparation be- nwixt them, In a word, whether the founder (heepmuft not be let in into one of their beft paftures, but kept from it, and there- by made weaker and leaner, becaufe of Goates, or other rotten lheep intermingled with them 5 will come in with them, which cannot be held out by a fingle ihepheard, ££ are not asyet>neither will be (in haft)fevered5S: fccludec^by the great and publick fhepheards joyntly and authoritatively.. And fo leaving thefe C^srres ot mine with you, as fo many bones — fc » ■»■ I 214 Chr.gavethe bread and wine joyrttly And gem Ally \not [tngly^&c* ■■■ 1" : ■ ! ■ ■ , bones for you to gnaw upon, or rather as fo much Helle- bore, or Rubarbe for you to champ upon 1 for the purging of your head of the lightne{Tekof your errour>and your ftomack of the heavineile of your choler. I paflc on , Onely in a word, or two, todciire the advifes of my fel- low brethren in the'Miniftery , (for I forefec you can ad vile me nothing to purpofe, though I have dciircd it) whether, being thus queftioned by a certain, uncertain Quatrelifr, for admitting unto the Lords Supper, perfons before they hold forth the works of piety and righteoufnejfe^ and before they are born again of water and the fair it ^ (the which is alfo adjudged by others of a better rank, to be a partaking with the unwor- thy receiver in their fin ; yea, fin it felf , and no leffe than the muithcring of Souls, and the giving them their bane and poyfon, and the like) whether J lay, (it my former reafons given for my admitting : of fome luch unregenerate (it may be,) ignorant, St (candalous to the Lords Supper againfl: my will, be nodrfficientjand reatonable enough,(.ksi know,they neither are, nor any other are,or will be)to them, whom you and I have to deal with, nnreafonable meny u the Apoftle calls them ; From whom, pray, ( I pray you) and fo doe, I pray, that we may be delivered,-.* Thefoi.) whether, I were not beft to do as our Saviour Cbrift did, at his fiift adminiftra- tion of the Lords Supper,! mean, give the bread and wine ia general ? joyntly to all, faying, Take ye, eat ye, drink ye all of this, Sc not in particular^ and leverally to the hand of each one, out of my own hand, to leaving it to the people to come up, and every one to rake a portion themleives with their own hands, after the bleffing and confecration, and breaking it into parts, or portions, and giving it in general. Two things I fuppofe, that you (my reverend brethren)* will Quaere me about, and ask. Firft? what proof I can bring of fitch pra&i'te of Chrift, and to what end, and purp fe ? Fii ft, none of the four Evangclifts, Mathew , Marl^y and £*%, for John relateth nothing of the Lords lalt Suppjr, the Sacrament, nor Taul the Apoftle (who profefjeih to have received from Chrift whatfoevcr he delivered to the firm-- tb'tans about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper , as alto to have delivered unto them whatfoever he received from the Lord) Chrgave the bread and wine )oyntiy and gener ally jiot [tngl%&c, 2 1 5 Lord) do mention any more but Chrifts giving in general, the bread and wine, and therefore alfo (which may be a fe- cond probable proof j he (peaks unto them5 to whom he gave the Supper onely joyntly , and in the plural ^ take ye, eat ye, drink ye. There is not a word, or iyliable in any ot them, of his diftributing and reaching out a part , or portion of the Sacramental Elements fingly, and diftin&ly out of his own hand to each Apoftle there prefenr. I could name fome of the learned, who fay, that Ch rift brake the bread into two parts with his own hands , and gave the one of the parts to him that fate next him , of the right hand , and the other to him, who fate next him on the lett hand, that they alfo might after reach to them that fate next them, till every one had taken a part to himielf. And the more likely it is that Chrift might do fo , for that accord- ing to the manner of the Jews, (as Rabbins report) the bread they ufed was made broad, but not very thick , cut and du ftinguifhed into many bits and pieces, by lines and furrows deeply imprinted, (like unto our Bisket of Souldiers,or Mar- riners) fo that it might be eakly broken with the hand into pieces and morfcls> which the Greek call Shu^ti**, ((mailer morfels) or £<»«&<«■«, whence BnccelU with the Latines. Secondly, they all relate clearly, that Chrift fate ftill ac the Table, all the while of the adminiftration of the Sacra- ment, and all his Difciples, or Apoftles (ate alfo with him at the fame Table* How then could he, conveniently reach out ofhis own hands the Cup, &c the bread broken, or pieces thereof, particularly, and feverally to every Apoftle , being twelve of them, and at fuch a diftance? for then certainly he removed not up and down,with the bread and wine in his hands, or carried it from place to place , from one Commu- nicant to another, (as it is done now adayes) and as the E- vangelifts relate nothing of Chrifts riling from the Table, and going to the Apoftles feverally ; fo neither do they fay any thing of the Apoftles riling and coming to him fingly, how then could Chrift put the Sacramental Symboles into their hands , or mouths feverally, fome of them fitting, or leaning remotely from him , no, not, though Chrift (Gould have fate in the midft of them, as Painters reprefent the a£ti- F f on 21 6 Cfoifi gave bread awdwint joyntly and generall^mt fingly &c. on uiiiallyrit is molt likely, and almoft fure, that he gave the Difh, ovPiatccr, and fo the Cup to the Apoftle, who fate next him, and fo they wnt down along the Table,and were reached about fucceifivciy from one to another, every one ta- king a portion of either of the Elements. I might alfo Cay thirdly, it is politively affirmed by one of the Evangelifts of one of the Elements , namely the wine, that Ch rift gave it but in general,and bad them divide it amongft themfclves in particular, Luke 22. 1 7. and (no que- ftion) he did fo with the bread. I would fay fo,but that I think St. Luke fpeaketh of the Pafdial, not Eucharift cal Supper. I know the ftream ot our Expofitours and Divines run upon the Euchariftical Cup here to be fpoken of, and meant jfor my part, I (hould rather undcrftand here the Pa- fchal Cup, and notwithstanding this, I can make up my Ar- gument ot Chrifb giving the wine generally amongft all the Mcipics, and not to each one of them feverally, as I (hall anon. But firft I will make good, that the Euchariftical Cup cannot here be fo well meanc , as' St. Luke himfelf (whofe praife is in the Gofpel as for many things, fo this efpecially, that having perfect underftanding of things from the very firft he wrote them down in order, to the moft ex- cellent Theopbilus and the whole Church) doth by the order of the Context (hew : For having dilligently and diftinctly declared, both the Pafchal,aud Euchariftical anions, it is not obfcurely let down, that Chrift and the Apoftlcs ufed a Cup, or drinking at the Pafcal Supper} for fo at the 1 7 & 1 8 vcrfes, before the inftitution of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, he reached out to them the Cup, faying, divide this among you, and doth plainly rcferre the words in which he protelieth that he will not henceforth drin\of the fruit of the Vine , to the celebration of the Pafchal'Lamb : for fo^ the particles And> and For, muft needs joyn, and even reftrain this of the Cup and his afleveration, to the immediately preceding Narra- tion of the PalTeover, and fo make them Pafchal. They that would have it fo to be meant of the Eucharifti- cal Cup, or Wine, are forcedjand fain to bring it hither by a figurc^hat of Anticipation, or preoccupation, and for this f urpofe >to joyn Chrifts protcftation of not drinking any more CbriHgAve brud and mint jsyntlj 4ndgener*ltyfiotfingl%&c. 217 more , verf, 1 7. to his proteftation of not eating any morc> verfj 6, To which I reply. Firft, there is nofuch Anticipation of fettingthe Eucha- riftical Cup before the bread , whereas verf 20. the Euchari- ftical Cup is mentioned again after the bread. 2. It is ftrange to me that the Euchariftical Cup thould be, and appear in the 17. verf out of its own due and proper place, at> and in the Paffeover, as which rather came to puc an end to the Pafleover Supper, tor the Eucharift begins ac the 19. verf This were to make the Apoitle hnke , who wrote down things in. ordrr ■, having hid perfetl underftandlng of them from the very firft , Lake 1.3. to Write down things diL- orderly, and to put down fomewhat firft, which was laft.and fomething belonging unto the Lords Supper, into the Paffe- over Supper. 3. If for that purpofe above mentioned, what need they call: a figure for that, when as the Pafchal Cup, there* at the Paffeover could, and would have dene it without it-, yea, did it, for of this Cup, Chrift fpake, when he laid , / mil not henceforth drink^more, $cc. alluding to the Canon of the Jews Paileover, wherein it was forbidden them that night to drink any more, after they had duink in the laft Cup of the Supper. For after that the Mafter of the family hath drunk the laft Cup : He fayes, this night I will drink no more. 4. May not this breed a great deal of confufion, thus to intermingle the Sacraments of the New Sc Old Teftament, and jumble them together ? to transferre by a figureof An- ticipation, the Euchariftical Gup from the Lords Supper unto or into the Paffeover, for thispurpofe to joyn his Atteftation of not drinking any more of the Euchariftical Wine , unto his Atteftation of eating no more of the Pafchal bread? efpe- cially, when as two other Eyangclifts, Math. 26.2 6 $1 M<*rk^ 14.24. do place the fame Atteftation of Chrifts not drink- ing thenceforth of the Euchariftical Cup as they think, at the end of the Lords Supper. 5 . I take it irt this his Atteftation -of not drinking thence- forth ot'the Wine Eucrrariftitai,in Mathero and Mark., is in- clrdedalfo,and meant, his not eating thenceforth of the bread Euchaiifticall (by a tiu:r figure of Synecdoche, which Ff a puts a 1 8 Chrift eat not, nor drunk Ettcbarift. bread and wine. puts down a pare for the whole) and Co likewife in Luke his Attcftanon of not eating thenceforth of the Pafchal bread, would have included his not drinking thenceforth of the Pa- fchal Wine, (by the fame figure of Synedocherputting a part for the whole) if the Cup had not there been added, and his particular At tc (ration there mentioned. For this I fuppofe will be, or mult be granted, that Chrifts Atteftation was ge- neral as to both Elcmentstbat he would not eat of the bread (nor drink of the Wine) Pafchal , untill the Kingdom of God (hall come. And the expreffing of both thefe Attesta- tions in the Paireovcr by St. Luke , is to me a rule to under- ftand both alio, though but one is exprefled by the two E- vangelifts, Matherv and Mark. Thus you fee how the expo(itionofSt.£#%,.rwords, of the Pafchal Cup, prevents all, or lome of the objections and inconveniences above, and alfo makes for a clearer expofki- on of Mathew and Mark^ alfo, about the fuppofed Eucharilti- cal Cup to be the Pafchal one, and fo gives me fome fatisfa- &ion, about our Saviour Chrifts eating and drinking of the Euchariftical element^ himfell (about which I fhall be thank- fuil to any that will give me more. ) For whereas in the two Evangelifts 01 r Saviour faith, / will not henceforth, or any more dfmk, of the fruit of the V^ne, If the words import, that then at that timc,he did drink of the Euchar'ftical Wine (and fo eat of the Euchariftical bread) I conte(Te> I cannot yet conceive how this can be agreeable to our Saviour, himlelf to Com- jnunicateof the Sacrament, andfo to eat and drink his own body and bloud, whether he f pake of an Oral, or a Spiritual -one. And befides? I Hear no worcls of our .^ayiours partaking by his mouth, I mean manducating , or chewing the bread, or drinking,and fwallowing of Wine, by any ol the Evange- lifts, onely they relate that he faid to the Apoftles , Take, eat ye, $cc. which furely they would havefpoken of, if fwch things had been done , as, who diligently, and accurately have fet down?the very circumftanccsof the whole bufincfle of the Lords Supper : And laftly, the Lords Supper was pro- vided by him, onely for the benefit of his Difciples .and his Church, himfelf having no need thereof. And I believe, the old Liturgy of the Church of# England intimated Chrift eat not nor drunk Eucharift. bread and mne. 2 1 9 intimated as much, where it enjoyned the Minifter , fit 11 ro receive the Communion in both kindes himfelf, and next to deliver it to the people, as, who ftood in as much need of the benefit thereof as the people, and therefore invited them thereto, by his Example of Hift receiving himfelf; For the realon why, they that compofed the afoiefaid Licu:gy,; [\w and thought it needfull,tobeputdownfor a Rubrick , or Order for the Minifter, to receive the Communion in both kindes* firfthimfelr, mutt needs be this,becaufe they faw, andknew,that it's no where recorded ot Chrift, that he did himfelf firft, or laft, receive the Sacrament, either in both, or in either of both kindes, as being incongruous and incon-* fiftent to his perfon, and himfelf having no need thereof. No more had he of his being baptifed, and circumciled, and keeping the Pa(Ieover,you will fay : ye^,that it was need- full for him firft to be Grcumcifed , for (o he was to be made a debtour unto the Law , to fulfill it in our nature,and might be fitted to keep the PatTeover. And fecondly, it was need- full for him to be baptifed, thereby to be initiated into his Office, and Miniftry, not of his own private Authority > but by a folemne Ordination and publick Teftimony ot the Sa- cred Trinity at his baptilme, and to be made known to ]o'j/} the Baptiftyzud the World to be the Son of God, and the great Mafter of Ifrael: But for what need and ufe Chrift himlelf fhould partake of the Sacramental bread and wine, I cannot tell, one tells me, for the fan£tifying of them to us, like as he was baptifed for the fame pur pole : Bir. I may tell him again, that the bread and wine were falsified to us,by his word of inftution, bletfbg, and giving thanks. Nor was our Saviour CI r.ft baptifed onely, or chiefly for the fanftifying ot baptifme to , and for us , (though for this alfo,) (for it was, and is lan&ified to us by the Holy word of inftirution, and by the Holy words of celebration, being ad- mi niftred in the name of the Holy Trinity, Father,Son,and Holy Ghoft,) but , as Chrift himlelf Ipecifieth , that he might fulfill sail righteoufnefle, by being obedient to Gods appointment in all things, in being born and Circumcifed> fo baptifed, and after Crucified, and fo holding a perfect fel- lowftvp, & full likeneffe in all things with us , (fin onely ex- F 13 cep:ed) 2 2 o chrift Eat m, nor drunk Eucharist bread and wine. cepted.) He was partaker of both Sacraments, Circumcifion and baptifme > to (hew he came to make both one, Jew,and Genrle, and to be redeemer of both, and of baptifme parti- cularly, alfo that he might give Teftimony , and approba- tion to Johns baptifme to be of God > by fubmirting thereunto in his own perfon ,and laftly, that he, coming into the world to be made head of the Church, might be (olemnely admit- ted thereinto, as all other Members are , and fo the head might confecrate baptifme to all the other Members , to be an effectual ugn of their admiflion into the Church, as, who are baptifed into one body , and by baptifme put on Chrift. But neither doih the fan&ifying of the Euchariftical wine and bread by Chrift, far:sfie me about his eating the one, or drinking the other ; how could he eat his own body, which was given for us onely, and do it in remembrance of him- felf ? how could he drink of his own bloud, which wasfhed for us oncly for the Remiflion of fins ? he fan&ified baptifme- water indeed, both by ordaining it, and partaking of it him- felf; bit hefan&ified the Euchariftical bread SC winc,not by partaking of that himfelf, but by ordaining them to us. And whereas it may be fa id farther, that one of the ends of the baptifme alfo is theRemiflionof fin?, and clearing the Soul from them, I return, that it was not requisite Chrift fhould t e baptifed,as to, or for all the ends of baptifme , but onely thofe above mentioned. Nor was it at all neceftary Chrift fhould be baptifed in regard of himfelf, as to this par- ticilar, feeing he had no fin in himfelf to be remitted, or cieanfed : yet in regard of u', whofe fins he bare and carried, it was neceffary he fhould be baptifed ,to feal unto us the clcanfingand Rcmiflion of our fins .• The which cannot be fo {aid, or applied of, or to h is partaking of the other Sacra- ment ; which is not therefore recorded in Scripture plainly and manifeftly, as his baptifmg is. Who will bring me into thayy O Lord^ and lead me in a plain path. And this is the plain path here , a^ I take ir, wherein all may meet and walk together as friends, Math.ivyznd Mark^ andLxke, and at lail fie down together at the Pallcover. My meaning is : The attestation ot our Saviour Chnft,of his not drinking any more of the fruit of the Vine recorded by them,and fet down at the end ot both Sacraments, the Pafchal and Euchanfti-- cal,lct it be intended by them,imphcicely, f why not? though it be not faid explicitly, to which) to have its reference into the PafTeover, and the Pafchal Cup there (pokenofin Luker and be but one and the fame, with the afleveration there mentioned 5 ot his not drinking any more of the fru;t of the Vine : and all parties are agreed,and this the conclu(ion,that our Saviour Chrift] communicated himfelf of the Pafchal Bread and Cup, though not of the Euchariltical. For it when our Lord Jefus Chrift was yet converfant in perform- ing the Rite of the Paileover ; he faid, and affirmed that he would not thenceforth drink of the fruit of the Vine (as the very context in Luke exprefly (heweth.) It is to me a very Demonstration, that afterwards in the tranfa&ion ot the bu- finefle of his own Supper, he d id not drink ofthe fruit of the Vine ; for then he fhoutd not have pu i.Ltually obfrrved ,whac before he fofoiemnelyaflevercd, which he did, doth, and ever will, as being the truth icfeif: But how is this aifo an argument, to prove that Chrift gave the Euchariftical Cup (and fo the bread, having broken it firft into pieces, whether juft twelve, or more, I will not argue it) to the D.fciples , or Apofties in the general,xo take with their own hands a por- tion, or in particular,to each one (ingly from his own hands?' why thus; becaufe Chrift did fo at the PafTeover , he gave the Pafchal Cup, faying to them j take this, and divide it amongft your f elves. They delivered it from one to another,, and to divided it amongft themfelves,Chrift onely gave it in general,,once forjall. For fuch indeed Was thecuftomc,, andfafhion ofthe lews at their PafTeover, where the father, or matter of the family, which was not to be fewer then 12. andfometimes 20. were joyoed >and then they were called the brethren ofthe fociety; Blcfled the unleavened bread, and the Cup,or wine, and (o they, who did eat the Palle- ts verr 222 C#r/7/ Mf not^ nor drunk Eucharift. bread And wine. over with him? cook every one hi; portion with his own hand out of the Platter and the Cup, let down, and removed from one to another. The which cuftome or the Pafleover our Saviour Chrift obferved, and pra&ifed at his own Sup- per; and thofe words of his, Math,z6,ij. import as much, where he took the Cup, and gave it to them, laying, drinks ye alt of it , taking it feverally,eyery one into your hands, and lb delivering it into one anothers hands, they who fate further off receiv'ng it from the hands of thole that Tate next them. And the fame is to be conceived was done about the Bread. One thing I muft adde for explication of my felf ; That 1 call it the PafchallCup, not as if it were a Sacramentall pare of the Pailcovcr, as who know, there is no word of it ac all in the firfr iriftitution of the Pafleover, and that it was the blood of the Lamb, that reprefented the Blood of Chrift, tie wine in the Cup, did it not(for then there would have been in one Sacrament, two Sacramentall fignes rc- prefenting one and the fame thing, which ought not fo. to hz.) But I call it fo, thePafchallcup, becaufe it was occafio- nallyufed in and at the PaiTcover Supper, by reafon of the concurrence, this had with the common Supper? but the night before, where wine was in ufe; l;ke as unleavened Bread was alfo occafionally utcd in, and at the Common Supper, by reafon of the concurrence , this had with the P.Uleovcr,whercunleavened bread might onely be ufed. But this muft not be ftr.ck ar»becaufe the Sacraments of the Jews were both temporallandfpuicualjrefrelhments, as in which were fome things, that were alfo fignall emblemes of their deliverance out of Egjpt9 and other temporall bleflings, and not onely Sacramentall pledges of Chrifts Body and Biood,aswereeafietofhewout,ofthe i £V.io. &ciflor-l5* especially where the great feall of jo fas , which was not the Sacramentall one, becaufe not kept on the fourteenth day, but on the fifteenth day, and therefore a common one, is notwithstanding called the ?afcha? ot Pafleover, be- caufe it was joyned unto, and with the Sacramental Pafle- over. If chi ft gw* *ot fitghi &c* ill If any (hall fay, that the Evangelifts affirming Chrifh breaking of the bread, do imply and intimate his distribu- ting of it (everally to them, with their favour I ihali fay, that thefc two differ far one from the other, t© break and to diftribute ; for a thing may be broken, which isnotdi- ftrfouted , and a thing may be diftribur ed , which is not broken. True,in Ifai 5 8.7 tbreak, thy bread unto the •hungry , is as much as diftribute, or deal out thy bread nnto the hungry ; but in the Evangelifts (peaking of the Lords Supper ^ break- ing cannot have the fignification of diftributing ; no not of giving, thefe being apparently d ftinft Acts, breaking and giving •• whereas if they were both one, it mould be a necd- iefle , and fruitlefle repetition , which Chrift himfelf rather forbiddeth elfcwhere then ufeth here : be(ides,the worddi- ftnbutethas any Aft of Chrift m the Lords Supper , I read not of, but onely this, that he brake, and gave it : Chrift in- deed brake the bread, parting it into divers pieces ; and fo gave it,letting them all together before the Apoftles in gene- ral, for them to take each of them a piece : But that himf If diftributed it piece meal, (as is faid) a piece from his own hands, to every one of the Apoftles fingly, is already contra- dicted by the reafons above mentioned , and Scriptures al- leadged to the contraiy. If another ihall plead it , that Chrift with his own hands gave the fop, buecellam intinttamy the dipped morlel into Judas own bands , particularly and fingly; It is nothing to this purpofe , for it was no Euchari- ftical? but Pafchal bread, and dipped in the Di(h, not the Cup, and onely to difcover Judas to be Traitour,not to figni- fie any inftitution of the Supper : and fo that a&ion of Chrift is as vainly here pleaded, as elfewhere by the Papifts for the juftifying their giving the Sacrament, but in the one kinde : for when they are put to it by our arguments ; they fay they dip bread in wine, (which they do alfo under pretence and fear, of f pilling any wine) and fo make a fhew and colour of wine given together with bread , (as Chrift dipped a fop and gave it Judas) whereas the Elements are to be given, not to- gether, but feverally,and the wine fo, as ic may be drunken, and not eaten, the perfect, and full alimony of the body, fo of the Soul, ftanding in both wayes, given aud taken of eat- G g ing 224 Chrift gave not fingly x &c. ing and drinking , and befides, Chrifts example is nothing to their, or to that purpofe neither. But now again, in foraying do I not rebuke the former, times, (and the prefent alio,) and to the praftife, then, and now, when Minifters by appointment did, and do give to every particular Communicant fingly , from their own hands, the Sacramental Elemencs ,,fayaig , Take thou , eat thou, drink thou ? No, I do not , nor defire to fpeak evil of Dignities. For neither of both wayesare any alteration in the fubftance of the Sacrament, or Sacramental a&ion (of giving J There is Chrifts giving in both, whether it be gi- ving in general, to all at once together, or giving in feverai to one after another fingly. The difference is onely in the circumftanceand manner : therefore the Sacramental Ele- ments formerly by fome were given to each Communicant fingly from the Minifters hand, and by others were gi\cn to them generally ,(o that every one with his own .hand took them, and by both inculpably, and without offence, becaufe given by both : and there was, giving in both, which is as much as is faid exprefly, Chrift did , (who gave , and bad take,erc) Onely I think that the change, or choice herein, I mean, of new manners, and formes of words, or circumftances.yea, though it be but of Letters and Syllables? in Sacramental af- fairs, is not to be allowed to every private particular man, or Minifter, to make it of his own head, and at his own plea- fure. So in Baptifme,it is by the authority of the Greek Church, that the Minifter thereof ufeth this form of words* Let the fervant of Chrift be baptifed in this water* By the like au- thority ofour Church it is,thattheMinifter ufeth fome what different and other words, I baptifethce in the name of the Father the Son and the holy Ghoft,which leemeth to draw nearer unto the command of Chrift,andthcpatternof John thejaptift, Matth, i%.\9.}ohn$%l6. So for the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, ufed and prefcribed in the Greek and Lacine Church was this , Let the Body an Blood of Chrift be profitable to thee un- to eternall life , and ,the party to anfwer Amen. After this Chrift gdve not fingly ,&c% 22- manner it is now done in our Engliih church. • Thus it was by the publ^ck confent of our Church of England, that Chrifts form of words at his delivery of his laft Supper. Take yc," eat ye, drink, fpoken inthePlurall were changed into the Singular , at our delivery of the fam: , Take thou , eat thou, &c. So likewife, becauie there is not mentioned in the Evangs- lifts the form or words of bleflingthe Bread and Wine,and giving thanks , which our Saviour ufed , feverall forms? and words of doing the fame* are from our Saviours ge- nerall onely expreiTed , by the appointment of particular Churches introduced and practifed ,• and in none of thefe courfes, or the like is any thing detracted from, or innova- ted in the f ubft antiall truth or the Sacrament, becaufe our Saviour Chrift hath not precisely dictated how many words the Apoftles, and Paftours of the Church fhould ule in the execution of their Miniftery about publick Ordinances, but hath referred them to a prudent and difcrect appointment, according to thofe generall rules (befides his own general! praftife) oifanttifying every creature (or Ordinance of God) by the word. Prayer, and Thanksgiving, and doing all things comely, and in order. Therefore it is, That I would not, (though to a very good purpofe) prefume or refolvc to make any change or alteration of my felt or own mind, in the form or manner of giving the lacred Elements in the Lords Supper, from a particular delivery of them out of mine own hands into the hands of every Communicant fingly, and lcverally, unto a general fcope and liberty made for every one who would, $c could not be kept oft, to come Sc take the fame from the Ta- ble with their own hands, before I had propounded Sc com- mended the fame to you (my reverend brethren upon this defe£t, and default of a fupcriour Eccleiiafticall power, that is not now amongft as) and defired that you would declare upon the matter and advife me (and othcrs,itmay be, as wil- ling to be fatisfied) whetherVit being no w, and that but of late made clear, at leaft wife probable, from the admini- ftration and example of Chrift, that he gave not the Sa- cramenrall Elements in the Lords Supper, fingly and fe- G a vcrally 2 2 6 Cbrifigave n$tfwglj>&c. verally with his own hands, to each one of his Apoftles, Due generally and joyntly to them altogether, and fo to every one to take his part with his own hands, from the difla and cup, aiter his Breaking* Biefsing, Thanksgiving, and Ex- hortation, Take ye, Eat ye5> dnnkye) It. may not do ve- ry well, for me and other Minifters to do the like, or rar ther the fame, in theie dayes Specially wherein we now live? You will ask again, I am fure, to what'purpofe? And I mail now tell it you, (who can better foretell it me) There- fore (rather J I will not be negligent to put you,, now at this time, m remembrance of this thing, though yt know it , and he efiab lifted in the prefent truth,yeay 1 thinks it meet, as long as i am in th's.Tabema cle, toftiryou up by puttingyou in remembrance, knowing that ftortly Imuftput of this my Tabernacle . Bepleafed therefore to remember, that, the giving of the Sacrament in generall to our people, behgmoft agreeable to our mod agreeable to our Saviour Chriits pattern, in that; hisfirft Admin Oration thereof will be to good pnrpole, as I. To fettle our confeiences at quiet, and in peace, when as we keep the Ordinance of Chrilt purely and entirely, j'n that himfelf iid, and we may do the like, without taking; awayfromft, or adding thereto, and that to the (topping alfo of the mouths of our gainfayers, of which there is a rab- ble in the world, that are al wayes quauing and queftioning us for humane addition?, and traditions in Gods ierviceand Sacraments. 2,, To put us further off, and to free us the more from that pretended and (though falfely and injurioufly impu- ted) polluting the Ordinances, andjparticipating of others fin* their eating and drinking of Judgement and gnikinefle of the Body and Blood of Chrilt, by our giving the Sacra- ment into the hands oi (uch fcandalous and unworthy recei- vers : For though it is an eafie thing for us to anfwer all {uch. more mahtious and paffionate imputations , than ratio- nail and Religious allegations, (which I here have had an occaMon to do, according to my fmall meafure) as that we do our duty in inftru&ing, admon filing , &c. and have no power of Jurifdi&ion co exclude fucji from the Sacrament* that Mi niflcrs giving itfo, appear clearer in the peoples eyes. 227 that we cooperate with their unworthy receiving onely, Phyfically, and not morally,, as it i> a receiving, not as it is an unworthy receiving. The which d;ftincr anlwers are, (Iconf-lTe) {utficient to keep us re^los m menfay andguik- Icffty, in ford confcienUdt* ( I know, Sir, you who are my Qim-elift , will (hut your eyes, and read no farther, upon fuch words,as the Jews gave, no more audience at that word Gentiks,Acts2 2.2i .and that you will blelte your feif, and lift up your voice as they did, and (ay? away with fuch a fellow from the earth, it is not fit he mould Hvotbat {peaks and writes Luch Gentilifti words, fuch heathen Latme , fuch Romane language. But be content Sir, I am not now, in this part of my Letter,(peak- ingor writing thefe words to you whom I know to be un- skiliull, and therefore a verie to all Univerilty languages, as well as Sc:ences, and therefore I have not hitherto troubled your ears with one Latine word, nor do I intend to beftow one fuch word upon you hereaftenbut you mud give us leave to fpeak to one another in what languages (oever we pleafe, and are skilled in, asSaintP^/j (who fpake more langua- ges than they all, the other Apoftles ) m one and the fame Chapter 22. or the Acts, fpake Hebrew to the Hebrews, and when they heard that h 2 {pake cti: Hebrew tongue,they kept the more filence, verfez. Sohefp^ke Ronune or La- tine, to the Romane chief Captain, and the Captain ufed him the better for it verify. But I leave you now agaiu for a while and return to thofe with whom I am dilcour- fing.) Though I (ay, Reverend Sir7, fuch orr anlwers and di- ftin£tio,-p are fuflficient to make us ft and uttos in ntenfa, and guiklefte inforo Confctcnti* : yet{urely (me thinks, I hope I may {ay all of Us thinks) our giving the Sacramentall Ele- ments in generall unto rhe Communicants, fo thatafterour biefsing, breaking, pouring out, giving, (as aforefaid) which were ChrifV, and arc to bz theM aiders actions) they coming up, take, each one with his ow 1 hand> a part and portion* This doth , and will much more evidently quit us from any partakerfh p of others fins in unworthy re- ceiving, and troin co-guikhelle with chem , waen as we Gg3 dcr 2*8 Prom f Making of Sin And co-guiltineffe , &c. do not fo much as cooperate with them Phyiicaily in their particular receiving, as who do not give it particularly into their hands, but they come and take it themfdves. And befides, this will be not onely a fpeciou? but a fpeeiai), yea, fpecificall answer and argument for us, ad bom'mem, & ad yofttlitm, you and I can fatisfie our felves well enough and pacifie our consciences, from thofe fate and folid diffin- ttions I have mentioned, but (youknow)They are the peo- ple, and popular, and vulgar, and (for the mofi part) illi- terate men, that Qusere with us, and quarrel! at us, under- ftanding neither what they fay, not whereof they affirm themfelves, and much leffe what we fay or affirm, in our Scholafticalldiltin&ions and difputes. Now this may be not onely an anfwer to fpeak us inno- cent, but an evidence to ftiew us guiltleffe of tncfe pretend- ed imputations, and fo to quit and clear us both in the ears, as alfo in the eyes of all men and people, even our ad verfaries of all colours* Brownifts, blackeits Anaoaptifts and Iefuits and of all ages, the elder and young Novices or Innova- tors, when they fhall or may hear and fee, we have no hand in any particular mans unworthy receiving? nor do co-a£tor co-operate with him therein, as who takes the Bread and Wine with his own hand from the Table , and of his own motion (prepared and g;ven {in the generall) to the worthy : And fo thus we may wafh our hands of fnch foul af- perfions, and fay, after we have faid and done all that in our private, ordinary, minifteriall power is to hinder it, that we are innocent of the blood of that juft one, fee they to it, if any fhall be guilty of it by hisor their unworthy eating and drinking. Yea (with Paul) every one of us Miniftcrs may plead, alter we have not fhunned to declare unto our peo- ple the whole Councell of God , about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, fo far as it is revealed unto, and impofed upon us by God in his word, and we ma y take our people, yea, our adverfaries to tecord,that day,we do fo adminifter thc Sacrament, that we are pure from the blood of all men who arc partakers 'thereat? my brethren. And what if I fhould propound this to you ? I will but propound it as a Quaere , leave it to you for a rcfolution> whether Sacrament a vi[tble word. 229 whether out* Saviour Chrift(forcknowing the times to come, might be fuch (as now indeed they are fuch) wherein his Churrch might be deprived and deftiiute of rulers & guides, and Iudges to exclude, and excommunicate the groflely ig- norant, and notoriouflly fcandalous from the Communion of the Lords Supper. And thefe notwithstanding would preiTe in amonglt the worthy, the godly, and the knowing not onely to the grieving of then fpirits, and the propha- ning of the Ordinance, but to the drawing down of judge- • ment, and damnation to themfelves, and to the opening oi the mouths of impoftors, and enemies of the Church,and Miniftery of the fame, to traduce andflandcr every parti- cular Minilter for admitting fuch perfons iiiito the Lords Supper> (when alas he hath no power to keep them off, but onely by admonition, and forewarning them of the dan- ger and evil effe&s to follow upon their unworthy recei- ving) yea, and to accufe them as inftrumentall and acceffa- ry to the others gultinefTe of the Body and Blood of Chrifl, &c, andeatinganddr nking their own damnation; and no anfwers and realons w hatfoever, though never fo clear and fatisfa&ory, given by the Minifterot the Sacrament, could or would give them any fat isfa&ion, through their ftupidi- ty or obftinacy, but ftiH they will be Quaering and clamou- ring of them , for poyfoners of the people, murtherers of Chrift,^. Whether I fay, our Saviour Chrift, by his not giving the Bread and Wine out of his own hands particularly, and fingly to every one of his difciples then prefent at his fftft Admlniftration of the Supper, though but twelve, but onely giving them the Bread and Wine in general], every one with his own hand, taking and reaching a portion, did not intend by this h*s example, to puttheMinifterof the Sacrament into a ready way of clearing himfelf of having a hand in the unworthy receiving of any Communicants, arid rofurnifh him with a good argument, or expedient, a- gainft the fianderous imputation, of guiitinelTe and coope- rating with them, in fin ? As for fome other reafons yielded, why it is better to give the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, thus generally than particularly 230 The near feltcwfhip and communion among communicants . particularly into every ones hands, they move me not (o much, neither do I "think Chrift meant them much. As firft, that the Sacrament is a vifible word, which the Mi- nifter declares in generall to his Congregation. This makes not againft Adminiftration in particular : but rather for it alfo * for the Miniiter is to declare the word -particularly, at leaftwife in the applicatory place: They will not approve of this fogeneralla word, who preach altogether particulars, Thou art the man and thou muft. do fo, and Saint Peter preached (0 particularly, Repent and be baptised every one of you : but Chrift here miniftred generally. Take ye, eat ye, yet meaning every one in particular,* fhouki take and ear, though he fpake it in general! term?. And as for thatreafon, becaufe that the giving it once for all, doth fignifie more fully the fellowship and Communion they have together. I conceive that the fellowfhipand Com- munion of the Church-members amongft themlelvcs, and with Chrift their head, is as well and fully preierved, the one way as the other, even as there is as kill teliowfliip, and Communion amongft the guefts, and with the Mafter of the Feaft , where a piece of every fort of meat is car- ved and tenr, or given from the Mafter of the Feaft unto e- very particular gueft, as where the whole dimes are let be- fore them, and every one is his own carver. Nay, in the firft way there is a more full fellowftnp and Communion 'twixt the guefts and Mafter of the Feafts at leaft wife. The Apoftle 1 Cor* 10. l« gives^us the right and full of our fellow- fhip and communion, faying , the fap of blejfmg which we blejfey is it not the communion of the blood of Chrtft , the bread which we breaks is it not the communion of the Body of Chrift i for we being many are one bread, for we are all partners of that ene bread. Both Communions are here fpoken, both of us members amongft our felves, and with Chrift our head,and the ground, and alfo fulneile of them is this, that we are all -partakers of one Bread and Wine, of one Body and Blood of Chrift, So we be partakers of them, it matters not, as to our communion, and I may fay, it manners nor, as to a fuller communion, whether we take it particularly every one with our hands our part from the Table , the Nli- nifter No Popijh cuftom, 10 give Sacrament into hands particularly. 23 1 nifter giving onely in general, or whither it' be given us out of the hands of the Minifies; fe orally to every one of us. Our fellowfhip and Communion is (hadowed out unto us , mod fully from the bread made up , and compaft together of ma- ny Grains, and from the wine made up, and coagulated to- gether of many Grapes, and our partaking of both, and not to much from the manner and circumftances of our partici- pation. And as for the lafl: rcafon,I do rcfent it worft; that the gi- ving it into every ones hand, came to us from a Popilh and Superfluous conccipt of the Papifts to bring more reverence to the Sacrament; there being a great deal of danger to bring in mens devifes to canfe more reverence. For firft , it came not at all from Popifli conceipt '? the con- ceipt of the Papifts is quite another way, as therealoner may lee, or might have feen,it he had but looked into their books. I will (hew it out of fome of them, becauf e I am to deal with a Scholler now, and a Mi nifter ,S aimer on >To?n.9tTrafl;,iz. pag. 78. thus relateth out of Canon ot the Made, (a fit book to tell us what is Popifh,efpecially in the matter of the Sacra- ment,) Notandnmeft qHodLandab, liter Ecclejia projpexit , ut ab ifio Tftodo, oUm licit 0^ nempe accipiendi propriis m ambus Sacra' mentum^pro Reverentia Euchariftia abfi'meant: and again : Ollm ex patina puis qui [que manibpts fumpfit fuam parti ctdam t at moris fait adfextam ufqtts Symdum^ nempe Csefar- Auguftanam , ve- rum ob [acramhu]m MjBer'u fmgularem Reverent .iam Ecclejia Jnfiituity ne laid ntsda manu Eacharifiiant attmgerent^fed a fa- cerdote inos fumentu mittcretttr. Thefummeofthe Words is this. 1 . That the manner and fafhion of the Minifters giving it from their hands unto the people, and of the peoples ta- king the Sacrament with their own hands; and iecond- ly , the other manner and fafhion of taking every one his own portion out of the Difh , cither of both was conti- nued^ and as lawfull unto the frxth Synod, called Q&par-Ati- gufcane^c therlore(above the fpace of 5 00 years afterChrift) To by the Apoftlcs, and prim'tive fathers prattifed, long be- fore Popery was hatched^ Yea, and I will add that the fame order was obferved in %j>me it felf , before it was Romifh, I mpan Popifh, as may be gathered our of the Epitf e o f Corne- ll h A'**, 2"3 2 Not Super flit ions to give Sacrament into the bands particularly , bus, Bifhop there, as it is recorded by Enfebim^ lib. 6, Hi ft or, cap.35. and NkefhorM, cap.9. This is thernft thing to be noted, and the rather, becatfe it is acknowledged by Popifh Writers* as well as Orthodoxe, that the giving the Sacra- ment into every ones hand, came not from the Papifts, nor from a Popifh conceipt, no more then every ones taking it himfelf from the Table. Secondly, k is to be noted, that the Church of Rome hath fincc judged and laudably provided (faith Salmron\) tbat the common people, or laicals forbear to take the Sacrament with their own hands; yea, that they touch not the Eucha- rift with their bare hands, but tnat it be put into their mouths by the Prieft, and all, in, and out of reverence to the Sacrament : How can it then be a Popifh conceipt of Papifts, to give the bread (for the reafoner mud: mean that onely, though he fpeak generally of the Sacrament) into every ones hand, to bring reverence unto it? when as Papifts, and that by the providence and inftitution of the Pope, do not at all give it into the hands of the people, but rather for reverence unto it, the Holy Prieft ( forfooth ) putteth it into their mouth?, that the people may nor touch it with their unholy hand5, in reverence of it; And as there is no popifhnefle,fo,I do not fee what fupcr- ftitioufnefle there can be in it, in giving the Sacrament into every one of the Communicants hands in particular,morc than in giving it in general. For it appears out ol the former alleadged Tcftimony,that both waves of taking the Sacra- ment were in ufe, and pra3:i{e,forrrerly>or of old:Thc which better teftified by ,ctertuBa»y lib, ad ux or 'em ; Euchariftis. Sacra- mentum nee de aliomm man'ibus quant Pr&Jidextittm fi*mimi*sy and Cyyrian ,Serm% de lap/Is brings many examples, from which it is evident, the Eucharift was given into the hands of the Communicants , out, or from the hands ol the Ptiefts : So that what is called , (mens dcviles,) was the practife of the primitive Church (it feems) (and therefore of the Apo- ftles themfelves) for above five hundred years , namely the giving of the bread into the hands of the Communicants. And when they had got up another dcvife for reverence lake the Communicant believer?, to bring with them certain filvcr Hot SuftrHitious to give Sacrament into the hands particularly. 23 3 ' filver and golden little velTels, in which they took the- Eu- charift, and by which they communicated it (taking it from thence into their mouths.) Two Councels, the one at 7V/ means faith he, they bring upon themfelveu, (whereas by the other way, of giving them in general,aud jovntly to the Communicants, they might abundantly eafe themlelves of) a great deal of charge and guilt, I fuppole he meaneth the charge $c guilt of partaking of any ones unworthy receiving in particular , or of particular delivering the Sacramental feales to any of the: unworthy receivers. And this is that ve- ry thing, and to the very fame purpofe, that I have been moving Come while unto you (my reverend brethren ) for your advife ; yea, and authority, (feeing there is no higher, that will (hew themlelves, and their power therein) about the introducing, and intertaining of that general way of gi- ving the Sacrament unto Communicants, if fo be the reafons given by me and others, for the fame fhall be thought and approved by you,tobe of moment and conducement to that purpofe, of clearer freeing us from thofe popular, Anabapti- ftical, and Jefuitical clamours, and imputations of our fintull guilt,and polluting this Ordinance, by our admitting wic- ked and Icandalous to the participation thereof. For jf f o,and by fuch means, this Idol imagination,and conceipt* (which is fet up in the hearts and brain of many , both our friends in Communion with us,or people communicating with us,Sc alfo our adverfaries in feparation from us)a difcontented par- ty, excommunicating themfelves) may be thus pulled down and removed ^ if the weak and honeil fpirits of the firft may be hereby ftrengthned and fatisfied, and the bitter, and un- quiet fpirits of the other, may be Comewhac Iweetned and calmed 3 , 3 8 Difcbarge themfelves of being co-guilty mth the unworthy s&c. calmed, when both (hall plainly tee , and evidently perceive, even With their eyes that we have no particular hand co- operating in any particular unworthy mans receiving: Sure- ly, (I (hall hope) you may, and will think, fuch means , and fuch a pra&ife fit to be intcrtained and retained too, -& may, and will both approve ot it in ycur judgements, and autho- rise it (as much as lieth in your power) and countenance,and commend it by your own examples :For if then a grcfly ignorant , or notorioully icandalous , or prophanely unwor- thy, whom to inftruft, to inform, tofanctify and dignifie, we have done our belt within the compafle of our calling , and (whom to exclude , excommunicate , and (hut our, it is*hot within the compaile of our calling, when we have done our bed:,) (hall intrude and rhruft in boldly amongft the reft, and (hall prefumptrouily lay hold on the welled bread and wine, and not decerning the Lords body? he eatetb and drinketh his own damnation j We, the MinKiers, cannot rationally be faid, to cooperate therein , (no, not Phyfically, as I faid before) as, who gives him nothing at all particularly at this time, but he mull be faid to take it to himfelf > and (natch ic from others, and to pull and bring upon himfelf fwift deftru- ftion. And let not thi^ retard, and keep you of, becarfe the Anabaptiftsdo fo, every one particularly takes a part of the bread himfelf from the Table, &c. Shall we oncly break fair, becaufe they Dine and Sup? when TertnUlan fa w fome of his brethren hold juftification by the works of Law, like as the GaUthiam did ^ he faid to them , Galaticamurflane Fratres : and Coy if I rrove for any of the erroneous Tenets , and pra- cTrifcs of the Anabaptifts , I (hall willingly hear of fuch a check ; Ambaptifwaris plane Fruiter : But muft we fa(t,becaufe they cat and drink ? we may comply with worfe then they are, in fome (acred, and facramental actions; but yet (now I remember my felt ) let them go, I have no reafon to men- tion them in this matter , or bufineflc, as, who (befides their boldnelle ; yea, rudeneffe, in fitting covered at the Table, when they break bread,) as having no trueo:dinatio:ij Sc (o nolawfullMirnftery,aud therefore no right confecration ; how can they have the Holy Sacrament,and the Sacramen- tal a£tions,and communications amongft them.) They have feparatecl of Minjfters being Paflors of Churches* a^p (epa rated themfelves, (ouks andbodies> from Communion with the true vifible Church of Chiift, and his members; how can they feparate Bread and A Vine to be the the com- munion of Chrifts Body and Blood? And (o (I pray) con- sider what I fay, and the Lord give you underftanding m all things, (ointhis one thing. But I defire wit'nall, that none of you be troubled hereaoouts nor your peace interrupted, feeing the analogy ot the Sacrament , ftands not in the manner of receiving, but in the matter ot reception oik felf (as I have touched) which is permanent whether the Mini- fter give it fingly into everyone of the communicants hands, or joyntly in the way, as I have exprefted. And the grace ot our Lord Jcfus Chriftbe with your Spirits, Amen. I return now Sir to you, and to your next Qusere, which is, what warrant we have from the word of God to own our felves Paftours ot Churches : I am Cure you have none, who have feparated and divided your felves from all Paftours and Churches. There are but two Quaeres more* and then all that fol- low s is about Baptifme , I mall be fhort in them,to make Come recompence, for my length of anfwer to the former. The onejs in thefe words. Scd. X. Of Mimfiers being faflonrs of Churches. WHat warrant you have from the ward of God9 toownyour felves Taftors of fchnrches^ whtlft you perform not theje duties which are enjoy ned to all Paftours of Churches by Chr'ifb and the Apoftles, of fhrift in Matth. 1 0.8. A&s 2 o. 2 8.3 1 . 2 3 , 34,3 5. iPet. 5.2,3. 1. 1 do thank you that whereas in your former. Quazrcs, you threw your ftoncs at me onely , like as SHmei did at David , 2 Sam.i 6. -5, now in ikis prefent qu2re,you catt in your bone of ftrife amongft all Paftours, & your balls of your wild fire into all Churches, thinking to difown and difpoilciTeusof our juft Tide and intereft in them, for you having joyncd I 1 others a4° Of Minifkers Wing Payors of Churches, others with me, we (ball the eafier caft buckets of water up- on the inccndiane, and the fooner'extinguim his fire. Secondly ,1 embrace and applaud ycur conveifion unto us (for fo I (hall now (peak or write in the name and behalf of other Paftors as well as my Jclf, they being not preient to hear what you fay of them, &c their Churche ) I fay of your converiion unto us, in a word,at leaft wife,if not in decd.For whereas heretofore your felves (for fo I will be as fair with you,to joyn you, &; your fellow people together* as you have been with me,<:o j jyn me,and my (cjlow Paftors) would not daign to call our material houfc* appointed for publick meet- ings,in or at divine wor (hip, by any other name or word but iteeple-houfes,nowyou vouchiafe to (tile them by the ufuall and common right name of Churches, the words in your Qu*re ( Paftors of Churches) 6eing fpoken to us as in an ex- ternal and vifible relation tothem,muft needs mean of peon liar and particular places (aswellas ofper(ons) fet apart for publick holy duties, and you do well to own them, luch lo- call aild materiall ftru&ures, for Churches, (as to their IsJamc- and Appellation ) or Houiesof God (as to their ufe and aflignation) it being no abfurdity,much lefle iniqui- ty, but rather elegancy and civility for you ot any other Chriftian* 'tofpeak after the vulgar ufe, and according to the common language as the Chriftians (amongft whom Prf#/was) defcribing the Ship of Alexandria, (ay, whofc figne was ^/»r and Pollux, words and names of a worie intimation if you knew it, than ours of Church and Tem- ple, yet they bauked not them, but fpake the ufuall terms by which the (hip was known, and commonly called. Thirdly, I fee hereby, this your Quaere,that (as you have attempted according to your (mall skill and power, to de- titheusasto our maintenance, and to dilorderusastoour miniftery, So here now you go about, but in the fame blind and weak pace, to dif-own and de-Paftour us* as to our Parociall Churches, and Congregations) and that under a talfe calumniation of our default in oilr Paftorall duties. I will (hew unto you therefore, that we have warrant unto the one and are not wanting in the other, i. We have as warrant to own our felves Paftours of Churches , that is Parochial!. ApltUs had their illimiud bounds anduniverfal Chunks. 241 Parochiall Churches , of thefe you mull fpeak and mean (having before quxred me abouc our owning our (elves Mi- nifters or Paftors of the Church Nationall or univerfall) unles you will fpeak and m;an you: felt a vain babler* a tau- colo'gizer and a vain repeater, and lb atriflerawayof the time. We have I fay, a warrant to own our felves thus Paftors of Churches, but it it be not f ro niche word ot Go J, it will not ftir you. General! equiiy and particular neceflity, thac people be forced and fevered into bounds and limits of pla- ces, more plainly divided into Partfhe-, for the more order- ly guiding of them, and affording them the means and helps, that may fet them forward in the way tofalvation, and thatfeverai Churches or houfes be eredt and fet up & fee apart, 8£ afligned for them publickly, to repair unto,and meet fot divine fervice , and worfhip ot God , and that feverall Paftors be fpecially placed there* to take care and overfighc of fuch parts and portions of Gods people, and to admini- fter unto them the holy things and mylteries of Gods word and truth, this moves not you a whir, though I muft tell you its a generall warranty , whereby we may own our felves Paftors of our Churches. You (like enough) that take your felf to have an extraor- dinary call , as the Apoftlcs had) and fo an Apoftolicall commiffion, fancy not our-owhing of particular Churches, and our being Paftors of fome peculiar and Parochiall flock, you are (it may be) for their boundleffe and, unlimited Ju- nfdi&ion, for their large power and univerfall miflion, and would bfcan Itinerant Paftor from high Safier to Maftbwy^ . from Mafhbury to I know not whether, from old England* to new England perhaps, and fo along to the Weft Ind:es9 without any ftreightening your gifts or limitation of your perfon to any one place. But then alfo I muft tell you that the illiraited Commiflion of the Apoftles was fitted to thofe firft beginnings of Chriftianicy, and the condition of thofe firft times, whrein it was necellary for the quick difperfing of the Faith throughout the whole wprld, and the fpeedier planting of the Gofpel abroad, and therefore it was not to be perperuall, yeafoon afterwards ceafed: firft in themfelves I i 2 as 242 Apoflies had their illimiudlounds anduniverfall Churches, as who divided among themfelves the (everall pans 01 the world, to which each one of them fhouid more (pecially preach the word of the Lord : So the Gofpclloi theun- c'rcumciilon was committed unto 'Paul, as the Got pel of circumcifion was commuted unto Peter^ Gal.2,j, hue they did not fc (hut up and confine or hclofe their cares within the bounds and compaiTe of any one Province- or Nation , but every one of them did notwithstanding lo take care of the whole Church and the world, as if that care had pertain- ed unto himalone, as Saint Paul witncfleth, 2 £V. n 28, The care of all the Churches Cometh ttpon me, or cumbreth me daily. You may fee here a more fpedall warranty from this practifeof the i^poffe, notfo obfeurely fee forth in thole texts, how they divided the world in a manner, amongft themfelves into feverall, as it were great Parifhes, and o wn- nedthemfelves-'Paitorsor" the (am?, and foby theft" exam- ple taught the luccediugagesto do the like, to malce divi- sion of die people of God into companies and Congregations according to certain bound; and limits, and to afligii parti- cular Paltors to own fuchactivihonj and totr.ke the care and overhght of them in matters appertaining to their fouls andfalvition. . But w i have not onely the examples of the Apoftles, and that general! word relating and confirming the fame, but weli'ave alfo their order aixl appointment in particular for fucceeding tirhes, and fo a mote f pec ia 11 ■ warrant ft ill from the word foroitrowning our felves Paftors of Churches. Youmay{ee^tiir>*^:i4>3. 'Wlkrethe Apoitl«t two of them Paul anfl Barnabas &rdai#ed ihem*Eidersw4t>iry -Church . and again, Tit.*. $. Fbt-this-left-l tfreein Crete, that thdti (hottl- defi fet in order the things that are wanting and\tndone^ and or- dain Elder sin eblr) City, Where this you lee, that after the founding of the Church, 'the Apoftles ordained Presbyters and afligned (everall or them to feverall parts of the people of God. True, that it* thbfc a Hedged Texts, and for Come certain time,; tfWc words, iri every Church, and in every Ci- ty, areboth but one and the fa me thing; for the City, and the places near adjoyning, 1 ike London and the Suburbs at firft Of Parochial! Churches dfsignedtvpmicnUr Minificrs 2^3 firft, before rhere were diftin&iqn of locall Churches in it^ made; butone Church, which being of (j large an extent, had, as it reqired, many Presbyters and Miniftersof the word and Sacraments i i it with power to teach inftrucTymd dfpence facredmvllerks unto particular and feverail por- tions of people afligned to tbem, amongft whom there was one chofen out to nave a more eminent power , as to the Go- vernment,to whom the reft were to be affift&nt. That thus in was, appears, Afts 20.17. and 28. liiofleCity of JEfbefds for example where Saint Paul calletfi for the Elders of the Church, and overteers of all the llock,fpeaking to them, a? many particulars for their number, admitted- into foaae part of Paltorali imploymcnt there , and rhen Rev* 2. 1, the Letter from Chnft? is directed, to the angel of the Church of Ephefus, as one chief Paftor amongft them, who wastiL-ft- ed \\ i'th the goverment of that Church and people, in mo:e ipeciall manner, than any of the reft, and is therefore chal- lenged by .name for things there done amifTe. From this ground- work,laid by the Apoftbs,in procefTc of time it aroie that" certain portions of thofe greater flocks of Chr ft and Churches of God, were divided out particularly 8c diftinclly afligned to feverail Presbyters, that were to take the care and charge thereof, (together with a certain pro- portion and allowance of the Tithes and offerings deduced, m which before were brought up? and paid in,to the communi- ty in the City,. I mean the publickTreafuriesof the Church) but yet with their dependance (till referved to-that chief Pa- llor of the City, who alio went fometimes to one, and fometimcs to another pi thefe feverail divifion", both to preach, and to o'verfce. And fo hence, and here came in that name andthing, which is called a Parifh, andParifh. Churches, fmaller and lefTer portions of people and Con- gregations, divided and deducted out from the great and mother Church or Metropolis, as I may callir. And fo after Kngs and Princes, and Lords of the foil , God ftirnng .them up thereto , out of their zeal and devotion to the Gofpel , piety and charity to the Miniftersof the fame, and for the furtherance of the peo- ples good of their fouls, gave feme of their own Lands and grounds 24 4 of Patrons to preftrtt fit Mimfim, andoffopuUr Elcttion. grounds for the building and fituating Parilh- Churches thereupon for dayly meetings , and fome alfo, for erecting, and letting up houles, and habitations for the Minifters, ad- ding alfo tome for their keepjrtg Cattle on, which are called Glebe-lands. Resigning their own right into the hands of the Church, and Dedicating them everlaftingly to the Mi- nifters of Cbrrft* in reipect of all which, the y had the honour and Right of nominating and prefenting fit Clerks to the Parifties fo en- dowed, or endowred by them ; as alfo of precedency 8c fit- ting htgheft in the lame Churches Sand were honourably itiled, the Patrones, as the Minifters were, and arc called the Re&ors, or Paftors of thofe Churches> lor that they under- took alfo to have the prote&ion of thole Churches, which is elpecially the patronage. And thus I have given you the Pedigree of our Churches Local and Parochial, and have (hewed you, how we derive our Title and claim to them, and (even in your words) own our lelvcs to be Pallors of them> even by fuch a Warrant from (he 'word, and the example and appointment of the Apoftles,and themfucceeding the fathers, and Guides of the people : It will be as needlelfe and ufeleffe, to tell you of the time?, when the preceding matters were done, or by whom, to give you the Hiftory of the perfons , or the .Chronology of the Ages, as to hang a Jewel of Gold in the ear of a Swine. You, I believe, rather hold, that we fhould own our felves Paftors of Churche?, from the Election of the people, and fuch d fcernersof fpirits as your lelf : I have laid fomething of popular Elections before. I onely now add this ; that po- pular approbation may do well, to come in at the laft : but it fcldom doth well, lor people to ftep out at the firft , and be- gin, or make the Election. The former may be (Secure for the Minifter to have it, but it was never fafe for the Church fofuffcr the later: What a dangerous thing it is to commit (uch matters of Ecclefiaftical, and Minifterial concernment to popular elections, and what tumults and uproares have fol- lowed thereupon; yea, very Schifmes,the primitive rimes and Hiftories following have had fad experiments of, and given Sffi teno SSS Kprefnt, who have the largeft foTto chooic.better means to d.fcerne, greater power to P°oeu e lueh as are eminent for learning and piety, being for Jh, mnft oart knowing ,and known menjudiaous it learn d, the molt Pa" u^TVh™ the illiberal , itijud clous, and un- healthy ****£$£$£■ ?£d beiides , they are tar- KIC MpS&don and bribery, Patrones ire in common reafon, as, who gave freely , they, or tneir aL (Vnrf the Doury,or Endowment; of the Churc :e„ ot whkh me 'have merdotethe Collation and Donanon of. Howfoever, if 1 laid it not before, 1 can lay it, that at .my u ,- SS my Church, and to my owning, my felf Paftor fhereof Thad the atteftation and approbation of many of hechlfeft People and Patimioners, the wh.ch I have yet to mew underS hands, anddomentionhere.to ftoP yonr mouth. oininthp wherebv we own our (eives ^twffift k KCout LyaW,or Golpel, we ^a»a»8-Ji .Sec. i «P«.5.» .and 3- ^^ f Sayeft tfc* which we have preached unto you, and you have re- ceived from US, let him, or they be accurfedt But I will turn to your Texts,' in which you lay are duties enjoynedus Paftors of Churches by Chrift and his Apoftles, which we performing not , cannot own our felves to be fuch ; and lb it may be you intend, Chrift and his Apoftles, your witneftes againft us , we are willing alio to have them our Jrdgesalfo* Yoi* firft Text whereby you would prove that we per- form not thofe duties , which are enjoyned all Paftors of Churches, is out of Math.i o.K.verfe. in thefe words, Heal the jick^, clean fe the Lepers, raife the dead, caft out Devils ; freely ye have received, freely, give : Sir, were thefe words m your eyes, your eyes in your head, your head on your fhoulders , when you cited this Text of Math,io,%. Sir, you that are fo great a pretender to Scripture, and the interpretation thereof , do you think it is enough for yor, thu- to make a fhew and orientation of a Chapter^ a verfe, OILtih, \Oi when as therein nothing in it of proof to you> or of reproof 8. to us? are thefe the duties ? which are enjoyned all Paftors of Churches by Chrift here? Certainly , you muft ekher have a face of brafte, to affirm any thing, or make a nofe of wax, of tin's Scripture, to wring and wreft it any whkher; arc all thdV,orfome of thefe, or any one of thefe enjoyned all Paftors ol Churches > Friend,how camefi thou tn hither, not (JMatht2 7 , having a wedding Garm nt i and he w&f fpeechlejfe , and fo may 1 *• you be, not having here any proving argument} how cameft thou in hither to this Text ot Chrift ? In one wore, I anlwcr againft you> here arc no dunes en- joyned Free peaching without Tythesy or wages. 24 7 joyned by Chrifb to all Paftors of Churches, and that for ever , but rather Dignities beftowed upon the Apoftles one- ly, which were miraculous, or if you wi(l, miraculous dudes en joyned to the Apoftles onely for a certain time, as the things themlelves fhew , Heal thtfick^y cleanfe the Lepersyraife the dead) cafi out Devils* ■ But I mud (as I ufe to do) anfwer alfo for you , th at you perhaps aim at the laft Words,/rw/y yon have received^ freely give-, and there think, a duty impofed, and enjoy ned us Mi- nifters, and Paftors to preach the Gofpel freely , without ta- king any Tythes : but you are as much miftaken in this, for thefe words apparantly relate (there from the Text) to the dilpenfation of thofe miraculous gifts the Apoftles were en- dued with, (mentioned before,) which as they had received them freely of Gods extraordinary bounty,for the greater benefit of his Church, and confirmation of the Gofpel j fo he enjoyns them , not to make tale , or merchandife of them, as toreknowing there would arife fome Huckfters and Char- terers that would be bidding and offering for them, as Sim** Magm loon afterwards^jfm?^ them money , togi\re him that power, &c. Ad. 8.18 « Befides, fhouid they be ftretched out as you do, the words will extend as well againft Penfions , Contributions , Re- ward?, Hire-, &c. as againft Tythes. But of thefe enough before. But, fuppofe,our Saviour did not mean it onely of mira- culous Cures , which he would have them do for nothing, freely, but of their Oraculous preachings, (though there is no likelyhood of thefe to come in here in this verfe) then the precept is tobelimited,astothattimc,asfor their Do- ftrine : for as for their labour, and at another time, Chrift laid , into whatloever houfe ye enter, Cay, peace be to this houfe , and in the fame houfe remain, eating and drinking fuch things as they give, for the labourer is worthy of his H;re, Luke 1 o. 5. and 7. Laftly, our Saviour in that precept, ordereth the afle&ion onely, and heart, forbidding a mercenary defire, and prohi- biting a greedy appetite of gain s but in thefe prefent times, permitting them to take (upply of neceflaries in the places K. k where 248 Tree preaching without Tjthes, tr vniges. where they preached, upon that ground before laid>that the Labourer is worthy ot his Hire ; And thus ftill it rmketh for us? that performing our duty, and labouringjn the word and Doctrine, we are worthy of our Hire , which is now in our Church, let, and fixed in Tyrhes; yea> worthy of double honour , maintenance , and reverence. So the Apoftle ap- plieth it, alluding, and adding,for the Scripture faith : The Labourer is worthy of his Hire, ipm.5,17. and 1 8. But what will you make of all this, if it ftiould be granced you j is it this, that becaufe we Min' Iters of England preach not freely, we are not the true Minifters of Chrift and the Gofpel ? out this cannot follow upon that, becaufe the falfe Prophetsand Minifters have'alfo preached fteely,and did fo in Tauls time, and in the Church oi Corinth, where alfo Paul himfelf would do, preach freely alfo, to take away their boafting,and as himfelf faith, 2. Cor. i\, 12. .that he might cut of occafion from them , which defire occafton , thai wherein they gloried, they might be found as he. And yet in the fame place, verfj. and 8. He tells them that he took wages of other Churches , (and that to do them fervice,the Church oiCorinth) namely of the Churches of Macedonia, and Thiliffi, and therefore this can be no note of aialle Mi- nifter, unleffe you will clamour alio St. Paid himlelf for fuch a one. The next Text is of the Apoftles , Paul And Peter 9 (though yon diftinguijh them notybut let all run y as under th name of Chrift himfelf enjoy ning the dutie, while ft living upon earth,) Aft. 20, ^8.31.33.34.35. Here are a great many verfes cited and alleadged , but to what purpofe ? and thofe (in grofte , in clote, in a cloud.) You do wifely, ftill not to write out the words, for then eve- ry Reader would anfwer with me> they were nothing to the purpofe, which is , or fliould be, to prove that we Paftors of Churches do not perform the duties enjoyncd to all Paftors by St , Paul, and to prove it, you onely tell us out of the Text above, what duties St. Tanl requires in the Paftors of Efhe- fus, and fo leave the Text. You (hew hereby what a good handler of a Text you are, what a goodly divider of the word you arc, who onely give us Citations and Nominati- ons- Uinifien duty to uh heel ' 249 onsof Texts, but make no application of any thing in if, nor preffe any argument thereout to your purpofe > or the proof of our not performing the Paftoral duties fpecified there,and no marvel , there are no fuch things there to be had , or found, For the Apoftle doth not charge the Ephefian Pa- yors with defect or neglect of the duties there mentioned, butonelymentioneth thofeduciestothe;r admonition and encouragement to goon, and to be conftant, as well alter his departure f ram them, as whilft he had been three years there wit h them. How then you will hence convince us of our not performing fuch duties of Paftors, andmakeoutof this word a warrant againft our owning ourfelves to be Pa- ftors of Churches, none but your fclf knoweth, nor your felf, who are here none, and nothing knowing. Efpecially feeing, Some of the duties your verfes refer to, are duties in ge- nerall, belonging to all Chriftians as well as Paftors, though to Paftors more nearly than other Chriftians, asTakeheedto yourfelvesy Watch^fParn, covet no mans fiher^c. Some belong not at all in the generall unto Minifter?, but to the ordinary, and Lay-Chriftians , as labouring with their own hands to fupply their neceflities, and fupport the weak. There is but one duty there, that properly and peculiarly is prefcribed to the Paftors of Churches, and that is, The feeding of the fio cfyf C^'fty oveT which the Holy Ghofihath made them over feers (by the Way take notice of this? and let it be added to the former point of our owning our fcives to be Paftors of Churches, that the Holy Ghoft by a mediate andjfubordinate power and authority of the Church,I mean the guides, and ruling officers of the Church did make, and yet doth make overfeers of the flock, andPaftors of the Church ofChrift.) I referve this duty of feeding to (peak to out of your next text in Saint Peter, As for all the reft , put them together, they will not make up a full deflnition,they do make up but an imperfect defcription of the duties of a Paftor,and that as Well of any Chriftian, as a Paftor. Yet We acknowledge it our duty alio, and chiefly To take Kkl heed 250 Miniflers duty to watch. heed to our (elves, and to our flocks to our fel vcs and to our Do&rine, and to our lives alb, thn we may be exam- ples to the believers, and in fo doing Co may Cave our felves, and them chat hear us , yea , we take heed to our Mi- niftery, which we have received in the Lord to fullfill it,our care is to walk wifely and circumfpe&ly, bccaufe the dayes are evil, and becaufe of falfe brethren unawares brought in, which come in privily to fpie out our liberty which we have in Chrift Iefus, that they might bring us into bondage, to whom we are not to give place by fubje£tion,no,not for an hour, that the truth of the Golpei may continue with our people, many eyes arc upon us, many fpies about us, it beho- veth us to take heed, and be heedfull. But the fame is alio enjoyned all Chriftians , and by Chrift and his Apoftles, Lukf 2i.8,and 34.1 Cor. 10.12. Heb, 2.1. We acknowledge it our duty to watch y for we are by our Profefsion and Gods Qmftitution made watchmen unto Ez, k 17 our PeoP^e» .w^10 turnin§ OUL' eyes every way, do from the *\.o« '• pulpit efpccially as a watch-tower, tell them and dilcover unto them, of their inbred corruption, and bordering (ins, and ot the approaching enemy,death, and the day of judge- ment, or the coming of the Bridegroom, calling upon all to be as wife Virgins, to be warchfull and awaking, yea ronfing up both them and our felves, faying to both, Awake thou that Jleepeft, who fleepeft in fin by fecurity, awake by repentance, and fall not again into the fame fleep, we mult keepopenand waking, our eye?, out fpirituall eyes, by a fenous overlooking our actions, before we undertak them by a diligent obferving the fpeciall corrupt inclinations of our natures, by a carefull examining of the particular fin- full cuftome 01 our callings, by a conftant refitting of the temptations of Satan to any fin, by a ferious avoidance of all occafions, and appearances of all evils, by a frequent Meditation of our laft day and our great account, by a con- tinuall pradtile of the works of piety and charity : thefe are our feverall watches we arc to keep, and that by reafon of the watcfulneffeandjvigilancyofourJAdverfaries, the Devil efpecially who never flceps,but is alwayes going about us,as a roaring lion, which fleeps with his eyes open* or hovering over MwiUirsdutpowit^ - . »5* over us as theTrin"ce~of the air. But the fame duty alfo of watchng, is enjoynedallChnftianslikew.le by Chriftaud wK Konft\':s.L!iir^\.%6-xV't^-i- , . , , , We acknowlege out duty » warn, tins being but a branch of our former diuy, and the part of a watchman, to warn Ifav both the wicked, that if thereupon he turn from h s wfrtedneffe, lie may lave his own lite, and W= alto deliver o^rlouU or if he turn not, we may ; ftill ddiverout.louls, Zush he dieinhis iniquity. As alfo to warn the Righce- , do notwitftanding our warning, he thall die intus fin, but hfsVbodQiallnotterequiredatouthand^but.fhedouot, upon out warning, he (ball furely live, and we have dehyer- edourfouK Thus with 1W, as our beloved fons, we warn von ourpeople, and as the Levites we warn them,that they Soaffe not againft the Lord, and (o wrath come upon them bu being thus watned as thePuanfeees andSaddu- ces^hev may flee from the wr ath to come, or as Noah, be- ing' warned of God by us his Minifters, may prepare an «! to the faving their houfes, but fouls elpecally. Butforthofecitcumftances or rather eminences of SauiUW' warning, every one night and day ; with tears,. thev are appropriated to his un.verfa 1 ,ur.tdia.on, un- tried induftry, and Angular compafsion. all Apofto- lYrXveaPauline, hardly to be imitated of us ordinary Patorr All men cannot receive this faying., fave they ^WtomtYis given = Hethat is able to receive ,t let him re- CeBut~here alfo this duty of warning is alfo enjoyned all Chnftiam like wife by Chrift and his Apoftl«,*«*.i«.i 5 . '^before I proceed unto our duties, as you mention queltion, why you beginning ¥*' VS C»- mflW hvthei9 and 3overfe in your RegiUet or i„ata iv K 3 iP,-Oi 2ja Mittifttrs duty to honour and bid others beware ofw elves, &c. to draw away difclples after tb.m. Truely, thefe wolves fof low you wkh open mouth, you did well to ftiun and avoid them, yet they are come up clofe to you, and nigh you,yea you follow aiter them , and are outgone them , for they onely entred in amongfl: them, not lparing the flock, y0u at your entrance in amongfl: us have not fpared, no not the fhepherds themlelves ; and doth not the other bar (tick as clofe to you ? are not you one of thofe men, who are ri- icn out of our (elves, fprung out of the womb of our mo- ther Church, viper-like, (peaking perverfe things, and per- verting things from the truth, to draw away difciples after you? I leave it to others to make anfwer, I onely move the Quaere, for Saint ?**/•$. propheeie was not onely limited to the Church of Epbefus, and thofe times, but reached to all Churches of Chrift in after ages. Now alfo we can here find fome duty for usPaftors, which you Would have filenced, en/oyned us here alfo by the Apoitle, as alto by Chrift, which is co beware our felves, and bid our people to beware of falfe Prophets,which come to us and them in (heeps clothing, but inwardly are raven- ing wolves, Linfie woolfie, fheepfie, wolvfie prophets. True, as 1 have written before, our fhepherds ftaffe, even Bands, is broken, we have no power to beat away, or tie up fuch fierce and ravening wolves: yet we have a tongue in our mouths, and a tooth in our heads left us, with which (if wewilldoourduty) we muft bait and refute, bite and re- buke them in our writings, and preachings, yea, exhort, warn and commend them to God in our prayers, (as our ducy alfo is) and I will bring in alfo the32vcde (which you left out too) And now brethren I commendyouto Gody and to the word of his grace^ which is able to build you up and to rive yon an inheritance amongft all them which arefanltified. And for my people, I will do like a fhepherd, not like the hireling, who feeing the wolf coming leaveth the fhecp and fleech, 1 will (land to them, and by them, and put that firft duty in pra&ife, taking heed over my (elf, and over them, and calling upon them to take heed what they hear, M*rk. 4.24» Take heed how they hear. Luke 8. i 8. take heed that they be not deceived->for?itany fkaU come in Chrifis name^ fay- ing Minister sought not nbtcoveUHS. 253 ing they are Chrifts,and theirs ChriftiauJDbftrine.Go ye not after them,£/^ 21.8. Take heed and beware of the leaven of the PariLees,and Sadduces,that is, their Doctrines, Match, I<5. 6. and 12. A little fuch leaven leaveneth the whole lump , and will fowr and imbittcr the fweet Gofpel of Chrift. But I go on with the 33, 54? and 3 5.verfes, which you cite for duties there enjoyned us by the Apoftle, where you aremiftaken, as to an injunction to thePaftorsof Ephefusy the Apoftle onely makes an exprelsion or declaration or himfelf, to clear both his heart,, and waih his hands before them, that he had coveted no mans money, that he had la- boured for his fupplies. I know the bent of your bow lyeth this way efpecially, theintentandaim of your Quaere, and this Text, is, that you may {hoot irtfecret at the per -felt , fudenly doyou $oot athim^ and fear not , and hit not here, for in this quiver or Text, ate no arrows made ready for your fixing or bow, as I have fhe wed, infteadof thefe youmayfhoot your, own arrows or bolts (and a— -bolt is foon (hot) even bitter words, that we are covetous and lazie. We, (though the Apoftle here enjoy ns no fuch thing) acknowledge it our duty, To covet no mam fiver or gold, or apparrelLWe therefore which teach another f each we not our fives? JVe that preach thou {halt not covet do we covet ■} We that ab- hor Idols muft abandon covecoufnefle, which is idolatry. We are and muft be better fervants of God than the cove- tous are, who are very Idolaters. How (hall webleffe the covetous whom the Lord abhorreth ? or ever praetife that as miniiters (covetoufneffe ) which ought- not to be once named among ft us, as becometh Saints} It is one of the chara- cters of a Presbyter, that he muft not be greedy of filthy lu- cre, or covetous ; For the love of mony is the root of all evil9 we muft not feed upon,who are to be feeds-men of all good: left whileft we covet after it? we erre or be feduced from the Faith, who ought to bring and convert others to it-, And fo pierce oar J "elves through with many forrows9 who ought to drop in comforts into our peoples wounded hearts, and fo give up our account with joy and not with grief (Thou O man of God flee this thing) But here alio the fame, of not coveting the goods of another, is enjoyned all Chriftian?, 2J4 Minilhrs notcwetm in receiving lithts^&c. as their duty like wife, and that by Chrift, and the Apoftle, Luke 12.15.^.13.5. Bet take this with you, and remember it, that Saint Paul faith, that he coveted no mans filverand gold, andappar- rell? nor do we or muft we covet other mens goods, our Tithes which I know you fhoot at in this bowf though with- out any arrow from hencc)^ are no mans but our>,our goods, not anothers, they are neither the purchafers to buy, nor the Landlords to let, nor the Tenants to hire, in all Con- tracts excepted or not mentioned, as the Minifters right, it is no covetoufnefTetodefire, feek, or hold our own, and to keep or recover the polTefsion of them unto our felves, in a juft and fair way , as to whom God hath bequeathed them, a* a dowry to the Church , we may fay,as before I faid, wilt not thou pojfjfe that which Qhemojh thy God giveth thee to pof- fetfe} fo did Jephthab anfwer Sihon : fo whatfocver theJLord our God (hall give umous, that will we poflefle. If tfic A- poftlefayth, if any provide not for his own, and efpecially for thofe Ol his own houfc, He hath denied thefaith9 and is worfe 1 Tim % 8 *^An m iHfi^ : What would you fay of us Minifters, now •• that God and good men, the laws of God and man, have provided forus» and alfo thofe of our own houfe andfami- ly, yea thofe of our order and calling, and that to all our fucceflors and poiterity, if we fhould pot provide for our felves and ours out of fuch provifions in a moderate wav, without injnrioufnefle to any, if we fhould not maintain our felve^ and ours, out of fuch maintenance by a provident courfe, without wrong to any, nay if We fhould not de- fend our felves and thefe our provifions and Maintenances, be; ng now in lawfull poffefsion of them for our felves, and alfo intrufted with the prefervation of them for others to come after us? Would you not fay, we were worfe than infidels, and had denied the faith, as bad as devil?, (For they ffde 6 h&* not their firfi eftate^ but left their own Habitation) and had abjured the truth , and caft oft all care both of our felves, and others,yea, and like the Judge, neither feared God, for whofe fervice and honour they were firft given and granted , nor regarded man, ourlclvcs, fucceflors,or Patrons, who, out of charity and piety endowed and indulged the Church with ffltiftjrs arc not to be brought to dqljiMhuAl Ubour% &c. with fuch donations and collations for us and them. There may be much impiety to the one , and ingratitude to the o- ther, if Minifters mould let their Tythes go whileft they may hold them : But no covctoufnefle at all, to take them, when, and whence they are due ; rather it's an innocent pro- vidence, where there is fo juft a provifion, and fo lawfull pol- fefllon ; nothing in this Text hmdrethus; but rather your, and others defignes, of coveting of our Tythes, Dues, and Rights are againft St, P**/V praSifc in this place j yea, it's not onely covetoufneffc, but facrilegioufnefre to take fuch away from us , and I know not of any pra&ile will be for you, but that of Ananias, nor of any Text will help you , but that of ^#.5^.2,3,4,5. and fo I am alio quit with you> for the number of the five vcrfes you wrote out of Act.2o. But I come to the 34. vcrfe^ which you quote for another duty enjoyned to the Paftors of Churches by the Apoftle, to which unlelTe I joyn alfo the 3 5. there will be in the firft, but the Apoftksfingle, and lingular example, telling us what he himfeif did s but in the fecond, he feems to-comend unto Pa- ftors of Epbefiu ; That fo labouring, ye ought to fupport t he weak,^t Here in the end, and the laft verles, lieth hidden your ding, and venome ; This is the mark you aime at , and the very white you will flick your Arrows point in, this is your Mafter-piece, your Task-matter piece , (by an injun&i- on, as you think, and a Commandment of the Apoftle) to lay heavy labours and burthens upon us, to bnog down our Spirits unto Handwo ks,&: Tradcs,who were never brought up to them,S£ fo make us doubly, or twice Minifters ; firft to Minifter unto our peoples (piritualnecefTitiesbyour tongu:s in pr.aching, and fecondly to Minifter to our own temporal neceifities with our hands Dy Woiking. It is that you would have, and hope (I believe) to fee, that we, who now talk fo much of Weavers and Plough- mens, ail the fix dayes,tuming Preachers,on the feventh day, (hail be after our preaching on the feventh day, turned to be "Weavers &c Plough- men, or fome,or other Tradef-mcn all the fix dayes> and fo ihall live upon our Manufactures , and Handy-crafts, inftead of our living of the Temple &c Tythes. O 1 this will be an excellent piece of purity to introduce into L 1 the < . ■ ■ . I — — - 1 . ■ II ■ . , — __ * 5 ^ Minijlers are not to it brought to dayty manual labour \&Q+ the Church, that long breathed after,.and fighed for Act of Parity,whcrcin it will be all atiftc, li|ce people, like Pricft, as IE* is //o/^.p.and I may run the words back,hke Pricft like peo- ple , and apply both the people as Minilterial as the Prielj, and the Prieft as fecular as the people : If this your plot and project take, you will fill the Land with iecular and femina- ryPrieits,whileft every Miniiter is ploughing and lowing.- And I hope then you will ccafe bawling at us, for worldly minded men , minding earthly things, when you have brought us to be worldly handed men,,handy-craftf-men. This will be to bury the Church alive ,,and to put it into the grave above earth, wherein there is no difference, or diitin- £tion of the walking Drift of Aaron and Abirtm ; yea , this will be to confound a well ordered Common- weak h , by ta- king away the diftinft Trades,and feveral profeflions of luch as have lerved out an Apprentiftiip for them, and taken their degrees in them, in Citie and Univerfity,fo that aPhyfician may plead Caules in Weftminfter-hall ^ and the Lawyer give receipts in Grefham Colledge;&; efpecially ,when a Lay-man, or whofoever will, may confecratchimfelf to a Sermon in the Pulpit, (of which beforehand a Clergy-man mull defe- crate himfclf to a journey at Plough. And laftly , may not this your devle ,be a hindrance to the poor people , and open their mouths againft fuch.Task- malrersjjor want, not fo much of Straw to make their Brick and Tyle, as of work it felf , which muft needs be taken from, them, when it is put upon our hands, and we alfo muft earn the meat out of their mouth, and learn the labour from their hands, (oyou will force the people to a new Trade alfo oi- gathering ftones , and throwing them at your heads , and beating out your brains , for dealing fuch a trick co deprive them of their work, and trades to live upon. I muft before I pafie hence, make one rcqueft, and move it, in the behalf of my felf, and my fellow brethren, to you, and the Qvrrfceis of us Seers, that feeing you will put us forth to fome manual trade, and Mechanic ^aLlWn&wc may, have the liberty to make choice of our Trade , which grant- ed, I for my part (aid! believe the reft of us will do lb) do; shoofetobeof St, /WV trade here, that is, to be a Tent--. rhakcr, In \»hAt cafe Paul did labour with his hands, 25 7 maker, Co AttA 8.3. hoping over awhile, I may be free of it, and return again (with the addition, or rediaon of h. which is a Letter? and a main one heir) to my old vocation, to which that cometh neareft, and be a Tenth-maker again. But, as I have (aid formerly in this my anfw:r , though Paul the preacher made Tents, yet Paul the Tent- maker did not preach, he preached not as a Tent-maker (I mean) but as Paul the Apoftle,and Minifter ot Chrift. Nor- did he make Tents , and fo work with his bands* (after he became fuch, Paul the Apoftle,and a Minifter, ^or- dinarily and ufually, as you would have u? do in the w.ek dayes > but extraordinarily and incidentally, at fome inftant, or time, in fome cafes and occafions, and upon fomefpeciai inducements and circumftances peculiar to him , and his condition he was in. Now your manner is> as I have for- merly {hewed, without any eye,or rcfpec~t had to thefe cafes, occafions, and circumftances , to look upon the fact and pra- ctice of the Apoftles, and prefently cry out? a duty to the Pa- yors of Churches, and call for performance ana imitation. Whereas thofe do much vary the matter, and fo far, that what is a duty,and neceflary for one in a cafe,at a time,upon occafion to do, may be no duty unneceflary , and (perhaps) unlawfull for another to do, thefe circumftances alteredjevcn this our Paul circumcifed Timothy at one time, becaufe of fome danger of giving offence to the Jews, Att .16.3 . but he could in no hand be brought to Circumcite Tit us ^ at another time for fear of betraying the liberty of the Golpcl , C*/.2.2, and 4. So in this very thing-, Paul (as himfelf fpeaketh) rob- bed other Churches, taking wages and ftipends or other maintenance from tnem,2 Cort\ 1 . Bi t he forbareitamongft the Corinthians, and would not be burthenfome to them that way, nor make ufe of that Authority, and power of mainte- nance from them, as it is t Cor.9.4.8C 15.2 Cor, 12.14. and 1 5. rather at that time,8C in that cafe he would labour with his own hands/ as at thi* rim°, 8c in this cafe he did amongft the Ephejians) and they fliould Minifter unto his neccflities. But now upon what fpecial cafes, occafions, or circum- ftances did Paul forbear his due and right, and put himfelf to the labour of his hands , and his manual trade ? himfelf tells L 1 2, us3 % 5 8 In what cafe Paul did labour with hU hands* us, fome of themes peculiar to himfelf at that timc,and with that people , that no man rrrght make void his glorying, whole glory was then, to let the Corint^:ar3S have the Gofpel without charge* i for. 9.1 5, and 1 8. or he would not be bur- thenfome unto them, that (o being crafty, he might catch them with guile as his Children, in not making a gain of them, f Cor- I2. M.and \6m oreifeit was upon occafion of his preffing neceiTities at the inftant, fo 1 Cor. 4,11. and 1 2. and here at the 34.verlc , he faith, thefe his hands miniftred unto h is necc Aides. Other cafes and occafions there were,as relating to others, which induces him to abftain that while from taking allow* ance,and to Minilter to his fuftenance by fuch handy labour, as the prefent poverty and neceflky of the Church before his eyes, by reafon of perfecution of Chriftians, and the appear- ance of fome fcandal to enfue, through the malignity of im- poftours, coming in, and looking ajbout to fpy out his liberty. Now feeing that the Apoftles labouring with his own hands, was thu-, a lingular and perfonal, and free ac~l of his and that but cafual, occafional^and temporary, what do you mean to impo'e it on all Minifters as a general and pafto raljfuty,cnjoyned us fimply and abfolutely* without rcfpe£t to the cafes and circumftances mentioned } for in thofe words, of the 3 5. vetfe, (how that fo labouring ye ought to fuppjrt the weak) there is no precept given at ail , or duty impofed at all, for fo labouring, unletTe it be labouring fo in fuch cafes, of apparant fcandal to5and extream poverty of the Church, in which, though ftrict juftice doth not com- mand an abftinence from due recompences, yet, equity and charity requires a forbearance. And that the Apoftle enjoyns no fuch duty to Minifters at all times, in all places and in every cftate of the Church ? from this his own pra&ife and example appears., for that in the fame Epiftle to the Corinthians^^ the fame Chapt. 1 Cor, % 1 5. where, and to whom he preached the Gofpel freely (U- boHr'ingw'.thhis hands*,) I fay in the fame Chapt.4.5.allalong to the 1.5. verfe, he pleads to hard 8c faft for his own right to afalary,as well as Peters 1 for the Minifters right to a mainte- nance, as well as the Levites y yea, declares it as Chrifts ordi- nance, Minifters may in [owe cafes labour with their hands. 2 5 9 licLDCCyl'^t they tha; preach the Gofpel^jhouldlive of ths Gofpe/y veil. 1 4. (havefuch a plc-ntifuil maintenance as he may live ot it> and need not labour with his hands for his living:) Zc lay- cth it rather as a duty upon the confcieuceof inftructed peo- ple ,t9 communicate unto the Teacher in all good, things , Gal. 6. 6 1 I lay nzi this, as if i: were unlawful!, f imply, or wholly for a Minifter to labour with his hands , or to life the trade, or handy-crafr,.for the fupply ot his neceffities ; for then I ihould blame /^/nere, and Paul here would even condemne me, whofe practice iheweth it lawlull in fomecafes,as before jyea, rather I commend fuch Paftors, as being through the Ava- rice, and Injuftice of people, brought into the ftraights of Wane and indigency, and yet unwilling to take of their hands from the Plough , and to dekrc their Miniftry , do employ themfelves in Tome honeft ,and befeeming work for the (up- port of themfelves, and their families, and the fupply of their neceflities; Neither doth that of our Saviour reprove them, Be not carefutl for the bod'/ and life^ or take no thought ; which M'atht6t2< being fpoken to Minifters as well as people > forbids onely a diftruftfull carenfctle without dependance upon Gods prov dence, or confidence in his promifes ; nor doih that re- proach themt Labour not for the meat that peri[heth^'h\c\\ (pj- ken alfo to both , is to be underftood comparatively , rather than the meat that endnreth mto evevlafting life. They may To John 6 a 7 labour, (o it be not accompanied wich d'itraftion.from , and with indecency to their persons and calling. But that it fbonld be a duty to be performed by, and en- joy ncd upon all Paftors of Churches, aker the example and (pretended) precept oiPatd here, to apply themCelves at all, working dayes and times, and occasions to a manual trade, or bodily labour, the example and pra&ife ; yea.ythe (fuppo- fed) precept oiPauly being but in certain cafes>Sc upon fome other occalions with other circumftanets doth not reach fo far, as to make it fuch. And further, I fay, it is moreunrcafonable to require ic at our hands* then it was, or would have been at Paul, or the Apoftles becaufe we, the mod of us, were never trained up in any other trade,& calling, from our youths, as they were. For the Apoftles wereftfoer-men, Pad a Tcnc-makcr : (He L 1 3 learned . Z 60 MimfttMmj in[mc cafes hi our with their bwds • ieamed ic not of Aquila^iizt he was called to oe an A^uitie, iut was skilled in it before) Co was Luksi Phyiician: Thel'e, -if there were cafes-& occafions, could live of their trades, ■when they forbare receiving maintenance : Now if they not- ) withftanding forbare labouring in their trades,and received maintenance, much more reafon is there we ihouid have our ' maintenance, and not be prelf;d to labouring, who have nei- ther skill nor education in any other trade,to Cart,or Plough or Dig, we cannot, and to beg we are alhamed, and fo will you too be aihamed, when you bring us to beggery, or to handy labour. .Yea, it will fall out to be rather fin then duty > as which crofleth anotherckar precept of 'Paul to Timsthyy a Paftor, I Tim;4.l 3« till 1 come y give attendance to reading , to exhort a~ tiony to Dotlriney mediate upon thefe th'.ngsygive thy felf wholly to them'-iio like wife another, aT/w. 2.4. which enjoyneth a freeing theMbifter from entangling himfclf with the affaires of this life, and from diffractions by lecular imployments,likc as the Apoftlcs in the 6c'». of Atts 2.and 3. qutced themfelves from an Office, and a Labour, more conjunct wich the Mini- fiery, laying, U is not reafon that voe fhould leave the word of God, and ferve Tables , or that we fhculd make Tables , or make Tents, in way of an ordinary workand occupation, to the hindring of our preaching the word. You, Sir, it may be, are of Thar 0 ah s minde and fpeech," and will be ready to fay to theMinifters of the Church of England, as he did to the Children of Ifraely Exod. 5. 17. yc Are idle, ye are idle ; Therefore ye fay let u* goy and do facrifice to the Lord, go therefore now and wo>\; How can they be |dle,that go $t do the facrificc,or work ot the Lord? I will anfwer this with another Text , more nearly concerning you, 1 T'Vw. J. 13, xvithally they learn to be idleywandring about from hoptfe to houfey and not onely Idle, but tatlers alfoy and bufie-bodles , Jpeai^ ing things they ought not. A man (though the Text (peakvof weomen,) maybe idle, though he be a bufie-body, and go aboi t from houfe to houfe, as y u know, who doth,working not at all, but are buue-bodies, and this Text fpeaks of men alfo. We reckon our felves alfo within the Law, Canon, and Com- MiwHers have tther labour s,thtn bodily jm& manual. **75T Command of Paul ; that if any w.ouldnot work^ or labour,«?/'- ther jhould he eat , iTtief. 3. io,. where he gives us another caje , or occafion , why among the Theffalamans alfo he wrought wich labour and travel* night &; day, that he might not be chargeable to any of them, not becaufe he had not power, but to make himfelf atienfample to them to follow firm who, .even now, when he wa> with them, this he com- manded them, that if any would not work, neither fliould he eat, as is in.the 8. and 9* verfes before , fo this was another particular caf:,or occasion of the A pottle, his Working with his own hands, namely to win credit and authority to his Canon, and Command about working, by his example of working then amongft them, ; when fie. gave unto them. Bur, Sir, . You are deceived if you think there Is no other work, or labour, but bodily and manual ; as our Saviour Chrift to the Apoftles, I have meat to eat of that ye know not ofy my meat is, to do the will of him that fent me, and to finish his work^ : So We John &.", have work to do, .that you.wotc not of, for our Work is to meditate, to (rudy, to pray rto preach, to rebuke? to exhort, tpinftruft, to comfort, to baptife, to communicate the Sa- crament, to vifit the lick, and in thefe to do die will of him that fent us, and to finifhhis works, and our work*, as, who vvprketh all our works in us5 and for us, asywho worketh in us both to will , and to do . Though our works be not Manual and Mechanical , yet are they Mental , and MinilteriaJ, (which are the greater,) and have their labour , even to vvearinelle of fpirits, and wafting of itrength,and that not without commerce with our bodies, not without our working brains, and {wearing brovves: fo the Prophet J fai ah found it a labour, and fpc ruling his ftrength (though . in vain, and for naught, Efatt 494. So Chr'ft thought of it, when he called the Minifter .3* * labourer 'The labourer, who is worthy of his />.'r*,Math.i o.and 9. Chapter, and St^Paullp accoun:ed of it, when he {peaks of the Elders, who labour in the word andDottr'ine, 1 Tim«.5..l 7* and,vvben he vviihed the Theffalonians to know .them , which labour amongft you,and to efteem them very highly for their, works fake,, 1 T/?e/,5.i2.andveri»i3,. , Yea, , ~i6z~^ Mimsttfs have other labours then bodily and manual. Yea, in fome regards I may fay, (yet with a Salvo to the Apoftles protefration that he laboured more then they all, the other Apoftles) that our labou.s,fbmc waves, are har- der,and greater,then the Apoftks, and <2W himtelf. For belides the knowledge of languages, and the other myfteries of falvation, which they came eafily by, efpecially the other Apoftles, (tor Paul learned them at the feet of Gamaliel , at theUniverfityof7'/w//«(asIcallit,) Ike as we do atC^w- br'idge> or Oxford^ or ellewhere, with much labour and pains) they came eafily to them, being infuled into them on a fud- den, in a day,orr . They aifo might eafily, and with little la- bour, know the Cuftomes and Laws, and Orders of the He- brews and %nmans^ and other Nations, which in their wri- tings they mention and allude unto j which coifs us a great deal of labour and pains, to learn and finde out by reading, and turning the books and Hiftories of thofe Nations, &c* And there are abundance more of errou:s and Hereiies rifen up in the Church, more then were in thedayesof Paul> or the Apoltles times, which fet us a work , and a harder task, and greater pains in refuting, contending againft them, and flopping the mouths of Gain-layers to the truth, which creep in upon us like the Gangrene, and fwarm in thefe laft times, as the flies did of old in in the Min'flry, who knocking of from the Plough, or leaping of the fhop-boord,an hour,or two fooner on Saturday, then ordinarily (hatch up a Bible, and next Lords day keep a f peaking of fome moral honeft things (at beft) to your profelytes, or a (pitting of fome venemous poy- fonous things (at worft) againft Minified : thefe are eafie to do, coft no great labour, you have a prompter, efpecially for the laccer? and a fuggelter. And for your Qugrings, An- fweringS) Expohtions, and Considerations upon Texts and points, (I canfpeak by experience) they are no way labori- ous, or elaborate , very vain and idle, mod of them : you may well follow your other Trade all the week long,and do fuch your work of Miniftration on the Lords day too: but do you remember what the Prophet faith of thofe that do the vorkjfthe Lord negligently ,or deceiptfully, Efat 48. 1 o. We Minifiers do feed the people. 263 We finde, that it is requifite to the work of the Lord , and *to the word of the Lord, to give attendance to reading , to Exhortation, to Doctrine, and to meditate (atorehandj of thcic things, and to give ourfelvcs wholiy unto them, (as the Apoftle charged Timothy,) sc finde there is work enough in our Miniftery to take up our whole time , our whole ftudy, our whole abliries : (you mall not need to think of Trades, and hand-work torus to be employed in at (pare t m s in the week:/ To preach twice a week, (befides all other Miniile- rial duties, in family and Parilh, (befides 5 that, (ome care of other Churches incumbreth upon us ) and to divide the word aright, is work indeed, and labour enough for the week. The which, though yon do all you can> to make us, Sc our labours,and works to be very lowly eft eemed,! mult tell you, you labour in vain, and for naught : Yea? though you fhould labour to purpole, and with cfTe£t,as to fome of them to bring us into lowetteem with them, yet we (hall be in high efteem with God, even tor our work fake ; yea, and though we labour in vain, and fpend our fttcngth tor naught, as to their co:iverfion,7£f fttrely our judgement is with the Lordy and eur rvojl^t and (a> in the Margcnt) our reward with our Cod. Though Ifrael be not gathered, yet [hall web- glorious in the eyes of the Lord,andourGodjhallbe oar ftrength, hUi 49.4. and 5. ac, who will deal with us according to our progrcfle,pains, and not according to our gaines and fucc iTe, elfe ours were the mod uncomfortable calling in the world. And to will that be the molt m terabit Church on earth, wherein the Miniftersihall belo much vilified 8£ di!e /eem'd, and brought down 1 j low, as to be forced to handy w^ks, and manual labour. This will argue cither the extream po- verty of that Church (which God ?e thanked, is not in £«£- land,) or the prophane ingratitude; yea, Sacriledge of peo- ple, or Ruhrs, (which God forbad , ever to be in England. The laft duty you charge u wr h the not perloimfng , is our not feed < ng of the flock of Chiift ; for which purpofj yoii cited, as^^.ao.28. fo i P*M.a.an<1 3- hoth which are to, this purpofe, to (hew, th at Pafr ut s < >u. in to teed their flo:ks; and what is this to your purpofe, c > Ih w that we Paltours of M m our ^4 Mini [ier s feed^&c Jytke rod of D ifctyline^ and hand of charity our Churches donot feed them ? Whac a iiily icaion is tnis, and fenfeleilt ? It is trie duty of Patters to feed the flock of Chrift ; Therefore you Mincers of England are no Paftour?, and why, becaufe you feed it not: prove rhis>ior this is that to be proved m particular againit us , of which you fay no- thing, bur tell us of what in general is our duty. Thus Dwarfs fometimes are begotten ofGyants,and mountains conceiving or rattier in conceipr, bring forth Mole-hills. But I fee , you cannot Ice Wood for Trees, you cannot fee as oi r flocks lor (heep, fo our feeding them for our paftormg them. i will fir ft anfwer you in the way you object to us. i . Wc own cur felves Paftouts of Churches, becaule we perform the duty ei ij.yned Paftours of Churches by the Apoftles, Ack.io. 28. i Ttf.5.2. and 3. for (o thofe yout Textsferve better for our performing than againft it : and might be anfwer enough to fuch an obje£tour. But as in all my former dilcourfe, I have intended to give fatisfattion to the caufe and point, and other Readers, more than to you &c your irrational writing: fo in this I fhall do, and will enlarge a little upon it s T he for- ma' daihei'mypen might ferve to blot out your Argument, There are divers waves of leeding the flock of Chi ill. 1. By the Rod t [o Mich. 7. 1 44 feed thy people with thy Rodythe fiocj^ of thine heritage } by this is meant Difi our Tythcs and Mainienancc, that we underling fhepheards and Paftours may imitate our Paramount Shepheard and Paftour, in feeding poor bodies as well as Souls,thac we may keep fuch falls as God chofe there in Efai> which is it not to deal our bread unto the hungry ,<£•*. poor- feeding fails : yca» and we make fuch feafts as Chrift himfelf biddech us,which is it not to call the poor, the maimed, the lame,andJthe blindc? even poor feeding feafts,L»^ 14.13. otherwife* both poor Minifters, ftr'pt of their Maintenance,and thereby poor peo- ple hindred of their fuftenance, both will blame you, for the not performing this duty , enjoy ned to Paftours of Churches by Chriftyand alfo the Apoftlesas I (hewed before out of Titus 1.8. which is feeding by charity &C hofpitality, though you have prefumed to attempt (but weakly) to wring out of our hands the Paftours (laffe of beauty ; tremble to think of the taking away the ftafte of bread from the poor. But the efpecial feeding of the flock of Chrift , is with the mouth ; I mean the preaching of the word of Godyjerem.^.i $■ and J will give yon Paftours accordingto my heart , faith God : which (hall feed you with knowledge and under ft andxng ; and lo our Saviour Chrift, John 2i.i5.I love ft thou me^feed my (hecp and lambs , which he often called upon Peter for, to fhew it Was a thing according to hi; heart, and that he dehred it might be according to Peters heart, to feed his {hecp and lambs. And becaufeyou have faid nothing , nor can fay to the contrary (if you could, you would, you fhould.) Therefore I may well and truely affirm , that we do, every one accord- ing to the meafure of grace given unto u , (*»d what haft thou, that thou haft not recived , why boafteft thou then?) do per- form this duty of a Paftour en joy ned us by Chrift * as who feed the flock of Chrift, with the word of God, that bread and water of fpiritual and eternal lite } with folid Do£rrines, Iwect Confolations,(harp Convi£tionsrbitter Reprehen(ions> varitiesof Dyet, according to the diverfuies of their Temper and Confticutions '•> fome we feed with milk; plainer and eafis M m a Rudi-» ,. %6f Minitters feed the people, by the mouth ef preaching. Rudiment?, if not able to bear ftrong meat,being Babes,and others, who a.e of full age, we fee ftrong meat before them, higher and deeper myffeiies,who by reaion of uie have their fenfesexercifeatodifcern, i CV.3.2. //and tongue, and all be in danger to be, if already they be not indeed, fet on fire of hell, to burn up alfo or fco ch at left wife our Pafturesand our fheep, and (what they may) is Pa (tor > and our feedings, aid our food, as Samp fans foxes tailed together with fire-brands, did burn up the (landing corn and fhocks, Judges 15.4. And becaufe I have mentioned (uch a tning as found, I fh ill tell you that we think it good food for people, Care- chifingy which (as the word impo:teth)is an ecchoing back or reloading back ot an anfwer toaqueftion, by which the truths of the word are much chewed, and better pre- pared, and made more light for weakrr ftomacks andeaficr for digeftion, as bread is Dy nudes for their children, (o rea- dy are we to bear with and to condescend to the infirmities ot the weaker, and not to pleafe our (elves, and him ihjtrs iveal^in the fait hy to receive, but not to doubt full difputation, but to clear and plain expohrion, Rom.141.and 1 5.1. yea fo to the weckjjecome n>e asweah that wemav ga%* the weak^ and arc made all things to all men, that we might by all means fave fomet and this we do for the Gofpel fakt yl Cor. 9,22.and 2 3, and are gentle amongft them, even as a nurfe chenfheth her children. 1 Thcf.2,7. And howfoever people do not well away with thi form of wholefom? and Lund words which SaiiK Paul advifcd Time /;■/ to hold faft? 2 Tim.i. 13. The principles of the doclrne of (Thrift , as they are called > Heb6.i, being a prime or principall food fo" people, but t;,ink (becaulc fomewbat highly .of themfeivesj roo: lowly of th;s,as but the childrens bread and m;lk,j yet St Luke com- snendeth it in the rnoft excellent Tlxap'hilttSyihu he had keen inftruited . 2 6% Mini fieri may feed t be peop re by r eating the Scripture inftru&cd, Catechifcd (fo it is in the original!) in chofe things whereof he writes to him in order, as implying ca- tccbiiing, propounding tilings to be known by way of quc- ftjon and anfwer, to be an excellent way of inftruStion, Ltiket.4- I with ferioufly for the peoples good and food (for it is good lood) that this were better rellifhed by them, or they abetter appetite thereto. This Paftorallcatechiungand feeding inltiu£tion by queftion and anfwer would make them luch Catechumens and proficient Schollars in the Di- vinity School, fo ground them in the fundamentall points of religion, and fettle them upon the knowledge of the foundation of Chrift, that thereby coming into a perfect mannei'j&CC. they would not be as children , tojfedt«andfroy as now they are, and carried about with every wind of Doctrine by thefleight of men and cunning craftineffe^ whereby they He in wait to deceive , £^.4.14. no they would not befo taken with every Dottrine of wind, as now they are, and with the preachments, or rather ptatements of the longed and ftrongeft winded Speaker, like Ships for want of ballaft and helm, driven of the fierce and blullring winds, whither theypleafe, Jam. 3. 4, if there be a great and ftrong wind that rends the mountainsand breaks in pieces the rocks be- 1 Kit. 19 ^ore tne Lord, they prefently think the Lord is in that II 1 2*# " winc*> and ^ a^ter tne w*nc* comc an earthquake, as there is, *' they think the Lord is in the earthquake : whereas if they Were well catechifed in the points of Divinity, and the Deity they would know according to Scr'ptute, that the Lord was in neither of them, neither the rock-renders, orfepa- raters, nor the earth-quakers , Enthufiafls, but I palle on, for you and I agree about Catechihng very:well, for you have asked me many Quaeres, to which I have and (hall give you an anfwer ; Sol hope you will make fome anfwer to divers Queftions I have propounded to you. And we think alio we perform another duty of feeding the flock of Chrift enjoyned Paftots of Churches, when we read the Scriptures to our flocks, before we fall to preaching, of the word, and that there is fome neglect of duty in them, who leave out reading of them, oncly hng a Pfalm, and fo afcend Ministers may feed the people by reading the Scripture. 26}' afcend the Pulpit* for To Shaphanihe Scribe, read the boot ot the Law before the KingJo/tasy and after fen t Shaphan with others to Huldah the propheteile to enquire ot the Lord for him about it, 2, Kings alij&dx and lb Nehemi- ah 8.2, and l.Ez,ra theTrieft brought the Law before the Con" gregationy and he read therein before the flrcet at the water gatey from the morning untill midday , and the ears of the people were attentive mto the bookjf the Lawy and verfe 4,Ez,ra the Scribe flood upon a Tulpitof wood which they had made for the purpofe7 and he opened the bockjn the fight of all the peeple, and they flood up y and Ezra ble [fed the Lordy the great Gody and all the people anfwered $/lmen7 ^/imen , with lifting up of their hands , and they bowed their heads and worjh'pped the Lord with faces to the ground, then at the 7. and 8. verfes/^e Levies caufed the people to under fl and the Law9 and they read in the bookjit' flinllly^ and gave the flnfiy and caufed them to undzrfland the reading. And whereas fome do call bare reading, bareLeding, (though I neither allow orpra&tfe reading onely without preaching or expounding as a Paftors duty, yet) they that lay fo, give an ill word to Gods good word, by calling it a bare food , even when it is but read ? whether private- ly or publickly, When the word upon the reading of it O-.iely by Shaphan made Jo fas to rend his c -loath s , to be ten- der heartedyand to humble himfelf and weep before the LordyVCtlc -I. 17* Lke as all the people wept and mourned when they heard the words of the Law read bj Ezra, verfe 9. was itbrta bare food to them? when in the 20. of Lukgy 2 5, * 6. ,the Lawyer came in and asked our Saviour Ghr iff, Mafler what [hall { do to inherit eternal/ Ifle} and Chrfl anjweredy .what is written in the lawyhow xeadefl thou} Did he prelcribe him a bare food, a thin diet, a hard fare ? though the Lawyer came but out of a Curiofity to hear what Chrift: would fay, and not out of any true zealor hunger and thirftafcereternalliife, as who thought himfelf lure and full enough, yet Chrift paf- ftiigby that, commends unto him the reading of the Law, as good and nourishing diet tor an heir of heaven to feed i\p- ' on whilfl: he liveth on earth, and tnc Apoftle Paul fo rela^ tethot Timothy y 1 Tim, 4, 6y that he was nyurifhed ugin the ■^TJ~~~liMHersfeed tU^J^h^ming exm/tes^ IhTworTof faith, and fo counfelleth Timothy i Tim.4.1% Che attendance to reading, to exhortation, toDotlnne, putting leading, (I muft think) of the holy Scripture', wfc*/> /r«» achJdhekadknown, aTim.3.15. whether private or pub- lick I think rather publick, becaufe put before his exhorta- tion and Doftrine, which were his Sermons or preaching," as a good food of" further nounihing. Go thou now, and dolikewife, you have as much for til's duty as you require -of me for every pra&ife the commands ot Chrift, and his Apoftle, Give Gods written word hononr, honour by your reading of k, as wellas preaching out of it,bemg both ordi- nary means, and neither ordinary food for the good of their fouls, and fo let the tinging of Pfaims come in aifo, not oneiy as mulick to their meat, but as tweet meats alto, to feed them further, as they are joy ned together, Col^6> Andlaftiy,we hop? alfo, we perform another duty of feed- ing the flock of Chrift enjoy ncd Paftors ot Churches, when we become examples to them, and go before with our exem- plary "ood works and holy lives, and this is mentioned in the text of duties in hand, aud is made a branch of feeding the peoplf , (as being examples to the flock) often urged, I by Chrift, CM.au 5. I6- Let your I'ghtfo {bine b.foremen, that they may fee your good Work* % a. by the Apoftb, efpecially 1 Tim.^. 12.be thou an example ot believers; In word, in converfation : and Tuns 2.7. In all things (hswinv a pattern of goodrvorkjy *» Doftrine (hewing forth incor- ruptnejfe, &c. the good life of a Paftor, and his example in good works, may be very favoury as fait, or as good fauce to his good Leffons and precepts in good words, to invite and chear up peoples hearts, to rake thefe down, and to feed upon them. Sometime a man that hath no great ftoma tures and admonitions of the Lord as dear children,even as a nurfe cherijbeth her children, 1 Thef. 2.7^0 let us (my children in the Miniftery) Be gentle among our people, and being affectio- nately defrous of them, let US be willing to impart unto them not the Gofpel of God onely, but alfo our own fouls, becaufe they are dear unto us; even the feamonfters draw out the breft, they give fuck^ to their young ones, Lamen.4.3. Onely the Oftrich in the wildernefle,/fc is hardened againft her young one$>as though they were not hers, Job 39.1 '5. And to our Titles of Fathers, Mothcrs,Nurfes, (which are as a threefold cord, binding us to that thrice repeated duty, Feed, Feed, Feed, fo let that fourth be often thought upon and mentioned of us, that we are the ftic.pherd } and therefore feed our ftieep, our Lambs, N.n 2, which :^4 <-/4 n Exhortation to his own Parijh. "which Chtift calleth his alto ; Forfauld not the fhepherd feed theflockj}lfa,^,2. Itsaqueftion asked, puc ouc of queftion by asking it, which is a itrong afterting hail Lords' over God^ heritage, fo you will but fulfill that Propheticall Text, iPet^^, and you nr. ft into it, to fill up fuller the number of them who are there already, c- ven Minjfttrs force , finely boldneffe in peaching . 2 7% ven (coffers, for fo its {aid there, There fall come jh the Ufi day es f coffer sjvalkjng after their own lufls, this is your Own Jul; ft But to icofte at Gods Minilters. But if there be any more to be fa id of this matter , it (hall bein the next) and laftQu^re, which is little letfe tun fuch another fcorfe. And this it is. Se&. XI. Of Minifters forcing their peopk to obedience oftbdr praciifes. WHat Warrant yon have from the fame Rule to force any into obed'ence to your praclifesywhether they will^orno} What ? No Text of Scripture , to back , or countenance this your Quaere ? I fhall be fo much the fhorter with you> feeing here you ufe,or rather abufe no Texts; for my chiefeft bulinefle hath been (and will be) to vindicate Texts of Scri- pture, from your mif-allegations and mif-interpretations : I may fparerry labour here ; and onely defend my fclf and MinirtersfromyoLirfalfe charge and Calumniation y our for- cing people into obedience to oiirpraftifes, whether they will, or xj„ Vvhat pra&ifes 1 what obedience ! what force ! I profelfe, I never met (and I am fory, I ever met) w th fuch a (hallow and hollow head- pan, fuch a rugged, and ragged hand-pen,. fo that neither can, nor doth exprelle themlelves , or give fenfe of the words they write :0 r difpencing the YVord and Sacraments, our warning Si admonilhing the people of their fins ;our receiving our due Tythes,our refufingofManu.il handy-crafts, do you call thefe our practifes, or what other do you mean ? which, until! you fhew us them, you mutt go forapradifer,or practitioner in the black Art of the new- light, againft the old-light of the Scriptures* and the duties enjoyned the Paftonrs of Churches by Chr iff and his Apo- ftles : and will be accounted a pragmatical intermeddler,and bufie-body in other men? actions, which is thrice condem- ned in Scripture, and is there reckoned and ranked with idler anddiforderly tatlersyfpeakjng things they ought not ',yeay w:ph evildoers, Murtherers and Thieves, The Texts them feiVCS I will fet down , becaufe you have put down none to this Qrxre to be added to it , 2 Thef 3, 11. 1 Tim, 5« 13- 1 Vet 4* i)^ So 276 Minifters force, wely I oldneffe in freaching 4 So our charging and commanding our people in the name of God, with luch and (uch duties our ftridt and peremp:ory denouncing ofc Gods judgements to all the difobedient and impenitent; our executing and discharging of our places with courage and boldne(Te,without tear of the faces of men, that we may carry the word of God with fome force in.o the confciaice(ior>Haitn,) and your (elf citeth the Text ac the very concluiion of your feeble Letter, how forcible are right jverdr , but what doth your arguing reprove , fob 6, 2 5. Do you call thfc our force ? or whaj: other force is it we ule ? f o you will condemne both Chrifthimfelf, and the Genera* i- on of the righteous , both Prophets and Apoft lesfor forcc,or forcing people into obedience ; for f o Chriff , taught the people, as one having authority, Wzxh, 7. 19* and aurhorifed his fer* vants, Luke 14. 23. Compel them to come in, that my houfemay be filled^ [oE^ek 2.6. and 3.8. Be not afraid of ' them, neither be afraid of their words , be not dfmayed at t'aeir lookj ^fp^a\ my words unto them, whether they will hear , or no ; / have made thy face firong a gain ft their faces, and thy forehead fir ong againft their forehead,$tct{o alfo ^#44.29. g£ 31. Grant Lord unto thy fervants, that with all boldnejfe they may fpeakjhy words ; fo they prayed, and fo they ptactifed, and they fpake the word of God with boldnefte} and fo St. i^a/practifed, who preached boldly n Damafcus , in the name offefus, A£t, 9. 27. and alfo prayed, ihztutterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly , to mak^e l^nown the my fterie of the Cjofpel,and may fpeakboldly as I ought tofpeal^, Eph.6.1 9. Tea, we command yon in the name of the Lord, laith Paul to the Thejfalemans, 1 Thcf. 3.6. and alfo bids Tt mot hy ,thefe thing s command t hou , and teach , 1 Tim,4. 1 1 . And fo let thefe Texts be our Rule , or "Warrant, for forcing (in the fenfe I have mentioned) peo- ple into obedience, to their and our prattle • and duties,Gods Commandments. I lhall give you more anon. It istrue,fome fhepheards oilfrael were juftiy complained of by God, that with force and cruelty they ruled the fheep, 5^4.34.4. and thisreferreth intheMargent, iPa.5.3. be not Lo; dsover Gods her itage:The Text you cited, for lord- ing over Gods heritage in Peter,mv>ft be ruling with force* and fuch as isjoyned with cruelty, why do you put afundet thofe Miwfters Lord it not over Cods Heritage. 277 thofe, that God, by the Pi5hctjSyiwdw§cthct ? why did you not joyn, to your force ,cruclty ? there is another Quzre.- The former and later, and fo both may bccxplained fur- ther ouc of our Saviours fpeech to the Apoftlcs,L*fc2».ar. the Kims of the Gentiles exercife Lordfop over them, and they that exercife authority upon them, are called benefatlors,M& they that are great, (as Mathc* hath :t) exercife authority over tnem,butyeihailnotbcib. . . The Paltoursof the Gofpel nfe no fuch force,as isjoyned with cruelty ; for we are gentle towards all, as a NurLe to Children, nor fuch force as is carried in Lordfhip, tor we are humble as fervants to them, 8c one towards another, m love. Didyou,Sir,everfee,andobierveanyofus,goin and out before our people in a lofty and Lordly gate , (welling in prde? Did you ever hear us comrnand-ng many thing o- bedience from them, in a forcible and violent way, compel- ling with tcr our? Then it would be fomethinglefle, then uncharitableaefle and falfehooi that you write. But we have not forgot our PJmmer ot Chriftianity , our far ft Ufloa taught by Chrift in his School, Mathi 1.19. tor we have ta- ken Chriits yoke upon us, and have learnt ot him to be meek and lowly in heart ; nor our tccond leffon to the fame pur- pofe, (which followed! upon the former inhibition ot any Dominion, or Lordfhip in us,) (Jutye^Uotbefo,forT*ho- • Cower 'M be treat among you, let him be your Mini fler, and ivho* foever rvill be Chief 'among you Jet him be your fervant even at the Son of man came not to be Minifired unto Jut to Mmfler Math 2g 2^27,28. The which teflon hath been, and is of- ten repeated unto us, qal.6. 1 . Brethren ,/f am man be fallex, ye,ihat are f?iritual,reflore fuch a one by thefcrttofmeekjeffe, according to which is that olPaul, 1 TheUj. and that 2 Tim. 2. 24. and 2 5. the fervant of the Lord, mufi not ftnve but be gentle unto all men, in meeknejfe inputting thofe that ofpojc ded, which I wonder,how they efcaped your hands and pen; we Proteftant Muiifters- and Divines do charge home the Pope of 2k«*,the High-Prieft there, for taking upon him, both a Lordly Title,£c a Lordly Authority over oods Hen- 278 7J&* ?* mj&w upon bim&omwion. tage (as .who ftileth himlelf Lord of Lords , and King ok Kings, and ufurpeth a power to depofe Kings, and to diipofe of Kmgdoms,and accounteth that he much honoureth them when he admitteth them tokiile his tee t, hold his ftirrup, and ferve at his Table, loaifo calls himfelf the Monarch of the Church, exercifing ever a Lord -like power and Domi- nion therein, over tht Souls and conlciences of men, par* doning,and abfolving where he pleafeth,retaining and bind- ing alio where he pleafeth.) And thcrctore, Sir, this was not handfomely ,nor penfomely done, for you, a Proteftanc (Divine, and Mjnifter would be) to retch back that Texc from Rome, and the Pope there, and out of it, to write down with your hand and peii5 unto a Protcftant Minifter and Di- vine, of his" , and their Lording over Gods Heritage, and for- cing people into obedience unto their practifes , and fo to make them guiKy of that , whereof they enditethe Papift, But no marvel j y&u and your party are of late much be- holding to Rome (where you have traded) for many new pieces , to patch upon yoi.r old Garment , Whereby you made the rent to be worfejor for fome of their old darknefte, to cover your New-light , whereby you have your Schifme the greater ,defending your telfj St your pra&ifes,& opinions by J tluitical Tenets and Arguments: fo that , though you run with the Proteftant Hound,yetyou hold with the Popilh Hare, and are perfwaded to be, an almoft Proteftanc , and an almoft Papift, if not this , moft of alJ, as may appear in this one thing (as divers others) for that you raile like a Pa- pift, and revile like a Jefuite, our Proteftant Churches and Minifters, and are averle and enemous (as venomous) both, to Miniftry and Magiftracy : But I believe the Pope will be cifpleafed with you, and take it ill at your hands, for pulling ot any Jewel of his Triple Crown, especially this Lordly power over people, (feeing all (uch Ecclefiaftical,Tcmporal, Spiritual Dominion was bequeathed unto him, in that three- fold will of Chrift, Feed, Feed, Feed, Iohn 2 1 .) and your con- ferring it upon us Proteftant Minift -is, for which, nocwith- ftanding your good will to us, we thank you not, as,who dif- claim it, and have formerly fliewed, what power and autho- rity we own and exercife. It is ^0/tf m Temper at D ominien over tbeUniverfal Church. 279 It is tnae, the word (to teed) in Scripture, lomeiimes ftgni- •fieth to Rule with Princely power and Loidhke authority, and therefore Kings and Empt rours of the earth, have been of old, and be (till called She pheards, as Efai 44.-30. Cyi u :, he it my Shepheard, But this maketn nothing for the Popes Regal, or imperial A> thonty, in, or over the Church, ei- ther in Temporal, or Spiritual things : For neither dotn che word, originally, nor properly , nor ufually iignirie, Co, to Reign as a King; (eldom, or never, lo, when cbefe words,the ftieep ot God, or Gods flock do follow ,and are conftrued with it, and fo not locally here, for in John 21, it'sttill feed my (hetfa ot feed my lambs : both,which make up a flock,there- i Ore in I Pet^/u's, feed the floe k^of God, I may thus argue hence; Thai which Chrift enjoyned Peter in the *i of lohn , the lame T^er enpyneth all Eiders in the 1 Pet, 5. for the words ot tne charges, both of them are the fame : But Peter ;n the Epiftle is fo tar trom either en- joyniugptcemptorily,or permifliveiy indu ging any Elder 111 this wo:d, Feed,to Rule with Lordly power, >r regal force, as Kings over the whole flock, or as Lords over their pecu- liar (heep, that heexprcfly torbiddeth t to 41 Eldeis,n that one and die fame word,'Feej theflxk, mn (as expounding the word, or declaring the manner) not a* being Lor sover Gods Heritage : and if once (ayi ig m Peter (Feed) give no fuch power and aiunority to any Eider , theu the tunce lay* lugto Pctcri 1 Iokn, (FeeJ, Feed, Feed,) cannoc give fuch a threefold power and Authori y unto roe iilder J?« as an Apo- O o Uic 2 So COAftivc power belongs to the Civ'd Mwifirate. file had an aniverfaU and iliimiced Comm ifio 1 , as 10 the place, and might feed the whole world, tiid all Nations, and therefore hath no reftraints, or bpunds oi P; fti i e , or flock*, let him by Chrifr, yet (you fee) Peter lets bounds and limits to the Elders,of their feeding the tl -k chat isamongft them, (hoc thac without, them or out of their charge : ) (o that the E;der of Rome (for fo he cannot be Succeflbin 10 Peter^s an Apoftle in hisill:mi:c d Comm fiton,hiu is onely Succcflour to Peter as an fcider,and thole Elders Pe>er f peaks of, in tiieir limited flocks, namely, that are amongft them) may now herei.pon give over being Pope, or Univerfal Lord,and over- ruler of all Churches and flock?, and content himfelf with being Elder,pr pariicular Paftour,aud Ovcrfeer,or B:'uiopof Rome, with the Churches and flocks that are amongft them, and thereto belonging. Nay, .he is not Pope of Rome^ or a Lord there over the flock and Heritage of Chrifr there, at lcaflwifc St. Peter ( whofe Succeflour he pretends to be,) tells him>he mould not be fuch there : he fhould be there, not Lord of Lords ; yea , not Lord of the fcrvants of the Lord, but a fervant of the fervants of the Lord ; This is Its bell: Title which he hath taken upon himfelf, if it be really and cruely, but there is no truth,or real- lity in the other taken up, and upon himfelf. But to come up a little clofer to the point, though you are far of, and keep aloof from it,as from your Texts : It is the Civl Magiftratcs Office to abolifh Idolatry, and to fet up the true worfhip of God, and that by an external force , and Coa£tive power, (how elfe) to bring their f ubje£ts into obe- dience, as> who bear the fword, and that not in vain. But yet it is awork of'Gods fpirir, and a willing work too, that a fubjed foi fakes Idol--, and worfhips God purely, at, or upon the command of a King :for theMag'ftrates may compel, and force me to profeffe belief and Religion, bur not to be- lieve, or to be Religious*, they may force ro the external means, but cannot compel co the end; to the means,! fay, as by removing impediment?, namely' Idols Sc (ajfe Teachers, . Authoritatively, as the pious Kings of Iudnb did, by pilling. down the Images, and cutting down the Groves, where, and Whereat the people committed Idolatry. Thus, as 1 faid, the COAtlivepwet belongs to the Civil AfAgiJlrate. ^g^ the Kings of the earth exerciTe power, authority and force: but it is not fo with us ; They, the Magistrates are called Mincers of God , Rom. 13. in tome fenfe : I know none, wherein we the Minifters may be cailed, or are, Maturates. And becaufe, you, who would impole iiicli a forGe upon us M mifters, which you oug; it to have proved, do detract the fame from the Magiftrate, I will therefore give you a proof of it, out of 2 C/?r,34.33. where lofuih tookjtway all the abo- mination syand compelled all that were found in I(raelfple olGod Allemoie on rhe Lords day > to worflnp there : it either tome would make more confc;ence ot their power, to entorce the Law, or you would make more confcience of the Law, to enforce your obedience of ic, ail diu lion would end in unity , all force in love ; all leparation in Congregation. We have no Rule, we acknowledge, for any Civil , or Temporal, or Poll i.al force; and it is not our piaftice to force any into any fuch obed ence : for it is the p eiogarive otChriftonely,theonely Prielt after the ord.r of Melch'fe- d*k..y to be both King and Pridian,} to execute bixh Offi- ces, Kingly and Prieftly. If King V&z, ah, w'.io fwayed the Royal Scepter will be a Pricft alfo, and lay hold of the O o a Sa» 7^2 Ours is but a Spiritual power. Sacerdotal Cenfer, and preiume to burninccnfe before the Lord, he to farincenleth the wrath of God, that he becomes a Leper.a id thereby loteth his Scepter. So if the. High-Piicft ot Rome, who manageth the Paftorai Crook, or Crofier, will be alio a King, (yea, King of Kings)and feize into his hands a. Scepter , or unto his head a Crown , (yea , a Crown of Crowns;) he {o.lardiihonourechand biaiphemeth Chrift, as that he will caft him down out of both Throne and Chaire, and confume him with the tpjrit, ox breath dt bis m ,uth, as Anti-Chrilt: And indeed there is Inch difference betwixt them, that they are inconfiftent in any one perfon, Prielr, or King , Cave onely Chrift ; nor can be united together. Here are twofwords,faid Peter \ and, though the pretended Sue ceilour ol Peter, (hatch up both and brand Hhes both,wc med- dle but with the fpiritual fword , which is the word of God ; Efhef 6t not with the carnal, or material i, for the weapons of cm waifare are not carnal, but mighty through God , to the pulling down of firong holds, 2 Cor.10.4. and foour warfarand bu- fineile is with the inward man, to perfwade and convince in love and meeknciTe>not with the outward man, to force and compel, with terrour and fear , intoche obedience of faith in Chrift •• this is the power Temporal, and of the Rulers of the ortwardinan,as I laid :Thele Rule men,though unwilling; we Minifters can do.no good to none, but them that are wil- ling. They may pardon Civil Offences , or Crimes effectu- ally} we do but remit (declarativelyandMiniftcrially) the guilt of fin in the confcience:They matter the bodies ol their fubjectf with death Corporal, we preferve the Souls of our hearers? unto life fpiritual and eternal. I hope, Sir, you w'Ji be of another minde,than to call to us for a Rule, for our forcing people into obedience to our practifes, as, who keep no frch Rule , pra&ife no {uch force, require no fuch obedience, as is Lordly, or Regal,Civilly and Politically. No not as Lordly and ruling, ecclefiaftically or parochi- chially, for Chrift himfelf, Luke 1 1, .14. as a private Mmiftcr refuted the office and authori y, ot oeinga Judge, or a adi- vidcr of inheritances betwixt Dicthren,tor Saint Paul hath clearly diftinguilhed in the 1 J imt 5, 1 7. betwixt KMmg well% •' and onrsisiuta SfbrittMllfMir., and labour ng in the word and DoStrine, we particular Mt- nifters, of whom, and to whom you write,betake our felves . to this latter office and duty, ot labouring in the word and. doctrine : we cake not upon us the former of ruling at all in an authoritative way of enforcing into obedience, by vir- tue ot our Paftorall iunction and order ; as knowing it doth belong, and (o we leave it to {uch regular and legail officers .= and guides of the Church, as are fet apart, or are to be Let apart, tor the ^xerciung holy and orderly difcipline, and executing afts of Hccleiiafticall Jurisdiction. I pray look about you, or about us, and fee our practifes Even thefe may tell you that We force not people into obedi- ence, nor to our, nor to their pradifes; whom do we force to come to our Churches, or to fly from your Conventicles? which yet were obedience for them to do; what force do we lay upon our people, to bring them to our Sermons ,ani their children to B.iptifme, or what force do we ufe to keep fome from the Lords Supper ? Do we private Minifters pull in by hair and head any into our pra£rifesr as you call them, which are religious exercifes rather, or do wethruftoutany by head and shoulders, from their and your practifes, as I may more rightly (tile them> when they are irregular exor- bitances? And yet ifyou be remembred, you qim*eled and quar- relled with me before, for admitting fome people or perfons, to the Sacrament, who were wicked and unregenerate, which you know or may, cannot be done by a private Mi- nifter, but in aforcible way and a (tro ig hand , and Law of Arms (having no arms of the Law for the legail doing li) why do you now here quereil and q uaerrell with me a- gain, for ufing force upon people to urge them into obedi- ence ? I fee you are in the mire> (ticking fa(f and deep, in which it will be hard for to come clear out without fome help. Let this retolucio:* help you out.-in this laft you quarrel atms for u'lng force to bring fome into obedience of our pra- ctifes ; but in the former they were your own pracli.es, you quarrelled with me tor not ufitig force, to bring others into obedience 6o,the ca(e being yours, you are for fprce,and for- cible exclufiou j the cafe, being ours, you are as much againft . force, or any forcible Proceedings, But jjji Ours Is but a Sprhuall potter. But Sir, I fliall neither go along with you, or ior you in your ruftick and Mech anick arms ot force,or force otarms, to do any thing violently and- rudely tor my (elf, much idle for you > neither can or (hall you cloth me with the ar- mour of great Goliath, piuting upon me his Hcimct of braife, his Coat of male, and gird ;ng me with his Sword, impoiing upon me, or rat her impofturing upon me thofe arm^of theCh'urch which are ot a higher nature, as luf- penkon , excommun cation , and Ecclefiaftick cenlues, as if I ufed thefe, and forced any by them into obedience of my praStiie. No, / cannot go with thefeyfor I have not proved them > and (o I put them oft me, they are no armour of proof for us. No private Miniftet beareth in his coat the arms of the Church,w-hich are of a higher heraldry than ours isf^ Ve bear inourarmSjCeniors, but not cenlurcs, and the Sword in our mouthsput not the keys in our hands, a> to excluding power. The weap^iv of our warfare are, (as I have laid out of Saint faul) Spirituall, Minifteriali, and as divine, as thofe of the higher powers; but they are noc luridicall,lurisdi£tib.iall and confittonail, our force- are not authoritative, compuifory, or enforcing, but onely fuafive , hortatory, and inyit ng. We are lo far from grafping me lame into pri'/ate hands, that we with that the withered branch of Aarons rod did flourifli , I mean the decayed power of the Church difci- pline were rdlored, and pur into p\biick hands of fame Church Governours, and Rulers, who oeing men fearing God, loving Trui-h, hating CovetoufnetT , and having no Am^itioi f:ie{Te,migrit indeed by a due and legall way ot Ec- clefiafticajl power,audAuthoriry,forceali into obedience, to the Religious Pra&ifes and devout attsof the Pu.^lick Wor- fhipof Godj (oas to drive out the Buyers, and Sellers out of the Temple, and the unworthy and prophane from the Supper of the Lord ; lb as to drove in the ftraglers and ouilyer? in the High-waves, and under Hedges, and to compel}, them to'ecme in, tfr.t GodsHoule may befil- lcd , and alfo to make way for Infants , and little chil- dren to be brought to Chr>ft , to the rebuking ot the tor- bidders, and witholdert , that Gods Ordinances be not fleighted. And then, if this ftaffc of Bands, which is now Ours is but a Spiritual! power. TST now broken or fallen down at leaft, were fet up right s the other broken ftarle of Beauty, wouid rife and clofe of it felf , and fo our Church would be both terrible as an Army with Banners, and alio beantifull as Tirz,ah9 comely as lerufalem : Whereas now it is defpicable in the eyes of many, and deformed in its face, for want of a jufl: power, and by the defect of a lawfull authority Ec- clehalticall and Paftorall , in prefent to rcpreffe Errors , , and Hereftes, and to redrefle Scandalls , and Diforders amongftu?. In the mean we private Minifters mud do all we can, (all we can do is but thus much, in preaching, praying, exhorting, forewarning , admonithing , reproving , pri- vately, and publickly, yea particularly and perfonally in fome cafes and at Tome time , to fhew forth our beft Spi- ritual! force, and utter our gteateft Ability) to bringin- toy and keep in the obedience of all, True* Lawful!, and Godly Pra&ifes, the people of God committed to our charges , Thefe things fpeafy and exhort , and rebuke with all Authority , (faith the Apoftle, Titus a. i5. or becaufe Titus was invelted with an eminency of Power and Au- thority over we are , being a great Paftor and Grand Ruler , and Irdge in Ecclefiafticall concernments. Let vs fpeak thofe things, and exhort and rebuke, with all cha- rity, and fome Authority, with all zeal and fome power* with all Difcreiion, and fome Iurisdi&ion. For I appre- hend nothing to the contrary, but that wc have Authori- ty, Power,' and Iurisdich'on enough , if I may fo fpeak by vertueof our power of orders, to fpeak thofe things, to exhort, to rebuke, and to put in execution our otlier MimfteriallAtts ; the which when we do and fpeak lbme- tfnoes in the Imperative Mood,Donotyou,becaufeyou are unskiltull in the Grammar rule-, call ic an imperious Mode of f peaking, and fo (hew your skill in your railing Rhe- tor que onely, when we urge with vehemency and zeal, feme things fit and needfull to be done, to bring the ptc- ple in obedience to us of them; Do not you tax us or violence and force, to preile them into obedience of our Practifes, unfit and needleile (for ioyou muff, and do mean). Be * not. ^58 6 ^A force in Dotfrine and (xamfle from Mintfer to ftofh. not [o fierce and unruly (as you are)in turning away our peo- ple irom their obedience , tor therein »you will but like .£/pw nor to chearfuily and effectually preach to thera from God, whileft they grieve us with their difobedience. So it may be the worfe for them : and never the worfe another way for us, whileft upon their neglect and ill intreaty of us, and, difobedience of what is required in the name of God,wegotheoftenerto God in prayer, feek and obtain love and favour from him upon fuch occafiom I might enforce this matter of obedience of people to their Pattour, from another rule or Canon, Ephejians <5.i. and Collojfians 3. zoXZhildren obey your Parents in theLordy for this is right: Children obey your Barents in all things^ for this is well f leafing unto the Lord. For the Paftors are unto them Spiritual! and Ghoftly Parents, as I faid but now, of whom they travel %n birth y as Taul of the Galathi- ans, till Chrifi be formed in them , and the people are fpi- GW.4,14. rituall and Ghoftly children to Paftors , born of incor- ruptible feed by the word of God, difpenfed by them or- derly , beloved fons , and begtoten of them, as Onejimus and Timothy o{Pauly and as new born babes fed conr- nuallyby them, with the fynceremilk of the fame word. For I fay no more , but what God faith , Mai. 1 . 6. a fin honour eth (and obeyeth ) his father; it then we be fathers to our people, where is out honour and obe- dience? but I will end with that Rule or Canon. 1 Thefu 12. FFebefeech you Brethren to know them which labour among you P p 2 and 2?o e^// Canonicall obedience is to the Canonicall ScripturtT* and are over you in the Lord, and admomfh ; ^dt77fte~emthe~m very highly in love for the* works fake , and to be at peace 4- mongft your fehes. As rhe former Texts are the Rule to enforce obedience and iubmilTion to the Pallors comman- . ding m the Lord : So this is the Rule enforcing reVe. rence and eftimation, yea affection towards themtbeimr fet over them alto in the Lord h obedience to their fuu- aion and calling for their Doftrines fake: So Reve- rence to their perfons and places for their works fake" We may here with the ApoftJc/uftly complain of the world, That we are wade afpeclacle unto the world,, that we are defpifed } reviled , defamed, and are made as the filth of the world and are the efffcouring of all things unto this day, 1 Cor. 4. with David, They that fit in the Gate, [peak agttnfl us, and we are the fong of the drunkards Pfalm69. 12. with the Prophet we are in derifton daily every one mocks, Jeremiah 20. 7. But wo unto the world becaufe of offences , for it muH needs be that offen- ces come , but wo to that man by whom the offence com- eth, Matth. 18. 7. And ttuly the Minifters of God are defpifed and contemned, as as it was foretold and determined, that they mall be hated of all men , and evil fpkenof all manner of wayes, for the name of Chrifl but wo to that man Chough you be the man Sir) by whom the Miniftcr, and the Miniftery too is defpifed and contemned. If I have found favour in thy fight O Codz and if it pleafe the Lord, let our lives be given us at our Petitions and our people at our reams! for we are (old , we and our people, to be dcsJroytd, and to pe- ri(b: Thou knoweft who are they , and where they arc that durft prefume in their hearts to do fo. I will not fay , to you , Thou art the man, even Haman : Rather I fend unto you advifing you and faying, have thcu nothing to do with that is againft, (foffic meant) that All Canonic all obedience is to t he canonic all Scripture, 291 that juft man and god too ( which was more than (he knew) Jefus and his Minifter? it was the glory of Hainan the Agagitc , to be Mordecais, and the Jews enemy, but at laft it proved his fbame and ru- ine-, glory not you in this, that you are John the Sc- parare,mine and toe Minifters adverfary, if you do, you do but glory in your fhacne, for fo it will prove. Remem- ber Sir, for I wifh you wdl for old acquaintance fake. I. What God laid of the people unto Samurf, they have not rejeHed thee, but they have re)efted me. 2. What Chrift faid to the Apoftles, of whom- foever , He that dtfpifeth you, defpifeth me : and he that defpifeth me , defpifeth him that fent me , as the con- tempt againft an Ambatfadour,reacheth even to the con- tempt of the fender of hi.n. 3. As for our people, they were refpe&full enough to their Minifters, till they met with fomeofyou, and you that got them away into your houfes, and fet them down in the feat of the fcornfull (who be- fore fate in the P ues of the awfull) and there taught them thecurfed language of Baals Pricfts, like as the Children in the 2 Kings tt 23* had never fpoken a- broad, fo bafely ani contemptuoully of the reverend Prophet Elifhah, as he was going up to Bethel the houfeofGod, and mocked him fo, faying, Go up thott bdd head, but that they ufually had heard fuch words and things fpoken at home by their Fathers or Governours. I adde but two brief things , People are not to think they have done all they ow to their Paftor, if they 2 a 2 All Canonic all obedience is to the Canon of the Scriptures, they arc (o farre obedient and rcfpe&rull , as to pay him their Tithes and dues for his maintenance, it i$ the chiefer a& of obedience , to fubmit themfelves unto his Miniftery, and to render their obedience un- to his Dodrinc and Prefcripts , being Regular and Canonicall3 according to the word of God, for here- in the contempt ot his Miniftcry redounds to the contempt of Gods Majefly. Again, we Pallors muft then onely expeel obedi • ence and regard from our people, when we deliver unto them the whole and fole Councell of God, and cany on our Minifteriall work according to Gofpel- Rules, and Chrifts commands: for then indeed peo- ples defpifing of us, is thedefpifing alio of God in his Ordinance, But they are (not Ibound under thefc names, or no- tions of Obedience and Reverence, to entertain it, to fubmit to every fancy and practice y that fome Mini- fters?in thefe times have the boldnelTe, and take to themfelves the authority to urge upon them, to their great prejudice and Spirituall detriment $ in debar- ring of them fome neceiTary Covenant- duties, as re- ceiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, unleiTe they will come under a perfonall Triali and Exami- nation, and can make it out , they are regenerate and born again, of water and the Spirit, as alio in debar- ring of them fome need full Covenant* bleilirgs, a> the bnptifing of their infants, untill they come to years of difcretion , and be able to give a reaion of their Faith. For thus faith the Lord, hearken net unto the words of the Prophets, that prophe(je unto you, they wake you All tmnicAll obedience is to the Canon of the Scripures. ad3 «p» metberBapnfrn.r»ak!tbaMaH0^ JJ> ytdifdPuU^ im,"u "uh,i fec,nd cormn'mg. Of Baptifme of Infants. a fide of your fecond fh:et, wherein arc four Confiderations brought, to prove the Iawfulneffc, the ufcfulnefle, theneccflity cf this pra&ifc, of Baptifing Belccvcrs,with thefe folcran word*, actheendofcveryconfidcration , four times repeated, Judge ye, and Judge Righteous Judgement, for God rrilU Se&ion J . Of Baptifme of Infants. I hope you will think me to Judge Righteous Judgement, if I Judge according to your Judgement, Tha.t the Word of God doth allow and authorize baptifing of Bclecvers 5 bus then I muft differ from your judgement in another , That the Baptifing of Beleevers doth not difallow, or cxauthorate, the Baptifing the Infants of Beleever?, and thac the one Icadcth in the other, as it were by the Hand ; if you had no more to fay anddifpute againft the Baptifing of Infants of belceving Parents, than againft the baptifing of bclecvers , the difference betwixt us had never begun. If I fpeak Parables unto you, it is becaufe you know not (he Scriptures, not the very Scriptures your fclf doth hrre quote, MattbtiZ.ip.tAQs l,$2.A8s %.$8.Acts 10 +j.Acts 2 2.16. &c. What do they all import, but that* Thofc Jswcs or Hcathenr, who were grown perfons, aliens from the Covenant , had em- braced the Gofpel and became belcevcrs,were prcfently bapcifed, or became baptifcablc ; And now that this i* no barr, or con- tradiction to the Baptifing of Infants, eppcars, for that rhc Infants of thofc bclecvers baptifed and entrcd into Covenant, if they had any ,had Iikewife a right unto baptifmefibeing in the fame Covenant with their beheving Parents, and either were in preftnt baptifed, or were of right baprifeablc ; So that the baptifme ot bcleevcrs, m«kes way and gives ground for the b p ifme of their Infants whence in other text*, fuchandfuch btlcevers were baptifed, th. y and all their Houfe $ which is ac- cording to the Tenor of the Covenant, in which G©d is, the God of the bel.-ever and his feed3 fo that the one hath as good right to the S al thereof as the other by venue of the Covenant^ God having Covenanted with both together. Infants once rightly bapt. not bapt. again when grown. I have formerly fuggefted unto you the only word, thac mutt help you here, to make the baptifme of beleevers ftrong againft the baptifme of Infants 5 and it is, the Word only; for if there were fuch a precept or practice to be found in Scripture, of Bap- tifing Beleevers only, then yOu would write fomctfeing near the matter (but yet mould not fo carry it away , to the overthrow- ing of the baptifing of the Infants of beleevers, the Scripture no where calling thein unbclccversj : But none of the Scriptures you cite, none of yourcxmfidcrationsyeu mention,do fo much as mention , much lcife infer the baptifing of B:leevers onely 5 Therefore now, Judge you, but Judge Righteous Judgement, even as God doth , you fee, in your own Texts. Or do you mean another matter, as I gheflc it, That Infants of beleevers born within the Church and Covenant, and bap* tifed in their minority , when afterwards they attain to feme ripencfle of knowledge and profcfllon of faith of Chrift, Oiould then, as beleevers themfclves, be baptifed again , Then I mud: tell you, that which you call the firft and great Ordinance of the New Teftament, is neither great, nor firft, nor Ordinance, namely fuch Baptifing of Beleevers ; Nay thcnlmuft tell you, fuch baptifing of beleevers, is not only to be negle&ed and o* roitted, but (lighted and rejected, yea preached againft and con- futed, as now in prcfent it ihal be. For what is this your baptifing of beleevers , but a rebaptifiug of them who were baptifed before rightly, and (for any thing you know ) beleevers alfo> Forfirft, God having given the Infants of beleeving Parents, Right unto the Sacrament of Baptifme, by fpeciall priviledge of their Birth within thebofome of the holy Church , and the Minifter having adminiftred the Sacrament of Baptifme unto fuch in the true Element of Water, with the Evangelical words, In the name of the Father 9 and of the Sort, and of the Holy Ghsjt, according to Chrifis inftitution}Containing in them the matter & forrr,and fo the very effencc of outward baptifrn, fuchbaptifm is good, fufficicnt, effectual and avayleable to Gods Children, and they ought not to be rcbaptifed : efpecially there being the devout invocation made to God for his bleffing, alfo a fcrious application of both, the Element, and Word unto the party who received* both, and that fecret reference which this afti- Aaa 2 oil One Baptifme. ■—' ' ■ - ^ ■ I ■■«! on haihio lite and rcmifr n ot Tins by vcrtueoi Chrifts own compaft nude folcmnly with hisChurch,therc ia not any thing more required to the myfticall perfection of baptifme outward- ly within the Church of God, conftitutcd and planted. Now that fuch Baptifme is not to be reiterated, that Infants thin baptifcdt are not to be rcbaptifed, I (hall prove unto you, both by the Word of God, and forac rcafons thence deduced : Epb.q. $. There is one Lord, one Faith, one Baptifme, one Bap- tifme, not oncly, i. Becaufcit hath every where one and the fame fubftance, confifting in one and the fame matter -, one and the fame form ; for we are not to ufe any other Elemental mat* ter, but Water, if it may be hadtnor any other verbal form buc this, I bapufe thee in the name of the father, the Sm, and the Holy Ghofl ; not oncly, 2. Becaufc it orTreth unto all men one and the fame grace, even one faith of one Lord into web we are baptifed, but One alfo, for that it ought not to be received of any one man above oncc,cven as we fcrvc that Lord,wch it but one,bccaufe no other can be joyned with him,'ckimbrace that faith which is but one,becaufe it admiteth no inovation; fo we receive baptifm wch is but one,becaufe it cannot,and muft not be received often.Thus all the Pious, 8c Learned, and Primitive Profeflbrs have interpre- ted this Text,and conceived »of this matter,thc Iteration of Bap» tifmc once given, to be a rnanifeft contempt and violation of this Apoftolical axiom and Aphorifmc, infomuch , that though the baptising mini ft cr were a Scifmatick or Heretick,or a wickc d one, they held their baptifme good and valid, and would not repeat it being performed in the true E (Ten-dais', the form of Words., and matter of Water ( as before^) yea and when fuch were converted and returned into the Church, they did not re* baptif*thcm,but received them and held them in that baptifme which they had in their Schifrn and Hcrf fie, knowing the fame to have been according to the form prefenbed. I have no reafon I confciTc , to put a weapon of an obji ftion into your hands, out of 19. Acts 5. but if I do, it is to take ic out of your hands apain, both to give you a blow in prefent, and prevent an after- blow. It is indeed there thus faid, Whin- tkty heard tk is they were baptifed in the name of iheLord JelUi-,md its faid befon-Vcrfe 3»that they were bapijedunto John Btptifin: Tjhii Text hath been much and mightily urged , and prtflcd, even One Baptijme, even co the Vexation or the Spirit, by your torturing Anabap* tifts, and truly the word* lye doubtfully and ambiguoufly at the 6rit hearing, as if Paul baptifedthe Difciplesof Epkefus with the Biptifmc of Chrift, who had before received the Baptifmeof Johtty and were never full and well clecred and explicatcd,until Bezn took them in hand , who ingenioufly confeflTeth that he received the fame interpretation, from that Noble, Pious, Ver- tuous, and Induftrious Divine Pkilippns Marnixius, that Angu- lar ornament of the Bslgick Church ; who was born in 1538. and dyed in 1 5^3. and lies in body buried at Ley den. I fay this, becaufe his name ought to be precious in the Churches even for this interpretation, ( though hi wrote Commentaries upon divers other books of the Bible :) and fo ought the name of tbeidorm B.za , to be venerable with us, as that fingular or- nament of the GalHck Church, for the like Piety, Induftry f Learning, and Vertue, as by whofe means this interpretation* came to our hands of this Church. I remember I have read it or heard it, written andfpjk^n,and 1 may(! think) write it & fpeak it again,thac as when God fc uid Vavidthc found a Man after his own heart: So whcnDavid fund Mdlerusp he found an expounder, according to his heart, and I may apply it thus here alio, That when Chrift found Paul, he foundachofen veflel and beloved Apoftlc, after Chriftjown heart , and when he found Luhg > he found a choife Hiftorio* graphcr of the A&s of the. Apoftle?, after his heart,and a beloved Phyfician, befides ; fo when Lukg found Bezay (and Beza Mar- nixiusj) he found interpreters of them, after his own heart, and Beloved Divines moreover. But what need fuch a Trumpet afore hand ? The Alm;s given , the interpretations given by thefc worthies, will defcrve it , and Ido not blow this for your fake, Sir, bur others that may f perhaps) read it. The fum of the Interpretation is this, that in the 5 th. Verfe above cited, Luke fpcaks not of any Baptifme done by Saint Paul) But Sunt Paul peaks on itill of Johns Baptifme, and fo you and all Anabaptijis are blown away from this Texc5as to any Anabaptifme or Rcbaptifation hence to be had : This is a (hort and fwect interpretation, if it can be proved j Yes learntd Beza proves it, ;and that from the two Greek Conjun&ivc Particles, *V|A- (I pray Sir, ftand aloof, ifyou be afraid* but you (hall not need, I do not Conjure 5 It is no Heathen Greek,no humane Aaa 3 learning 6 One Baptifme. learning, be content 3 that tor this once, or twice (It I did it be- fore ) that I may write or fpeak a little Greek*, it being, the Chriftian Greek, and Divine Learning.) Thefe two particles, ever have relation one to the other,knitting together the parts of the Verfc or Verfes,and make them anfwer fitly one to the other. Therefore the particle (& ) in the 5. Verfc, moft nccciTarily anfwer to the particle (<#>) in the 4 th, Verfc , and fo in no wife doth or will fuffcr, that the fcries of the fpecch bejbroken of, as if the former in the 4th. Vcrfe were to be attributed to P as who deccafed long before, 30. or 40. years ; In Judea, a place alfo far diftant from this City of Ephefusy where thefe twelve Difciples dwelt , baptifed (in all likely hood) of fome of Johns Difciples) And the gifts following thereupon, which before Paul fignified by the name of the Spirit, ana of which he had qucftioncd them , He confirmed and eftablifhcd the Epbefine Church ; And fo fto (hew yet farther) that Beza and the other above named arc inteprcters after Lukes heart (as I faid) fee a- gainL«% himfelfin Acts 1. 6. and 7. verfes, where both arc joyncd together in like manner by the fame Particles ffo, and <&. Yea moreover , if Paul had here baptifed thefe 1 2. Difciples ofEphefus, furc he would have made mention of it in the 1 Cor. 2.13,1 4, &c. where of fet purpofc he reckoned up fuch as were baptifed by him, not only at Corinth, but clfc where 5 Yea and writing from Ephefus to Corinth, he doth not mention them a- rnongft the reft, whom if he had baptifed > he furcly would and fhould I wifh indeed, that thofc of our excellently Learned Tranfla- tors^ who took this part of the Afts of the Apoftles in hand, had cxprefled the meaning thereof in fomc playncr and more pcrfpi- cuous Engliih, and had made it plain upon the Tables (Verfc or Margin) that he might have run that rcadcth it , and he that readeth it might have feen and undcrftood,thar, rbcy who heard (Jchi j when living, and belccv;d his Doftrine) were here fpo» of One Baptifme. ken of to have b:cn Baptifed of him, and not the 12. Difciples of Ephefm hearing Paul to have been baptifed of him as the words now read feem to (hew , which occafioncd ( though through their ignorance and wilfulnefs) this error of Rcbapii* ling* But I will not be fo prcfumptuous, as to profcribc or prc- fcribe any thing here. But, it may be, you, and the Anabaptifts> who comply with the Papijis in divers other of their Tenets, do alfo hold with them in this alfo, that Johns baptifme was much different from Chrifts baptifme, and not a like cffcftuall, (like as you (ay the fame of our baptifing of Children > that it is invalid and con- trary do Chrifts baptifme) and do therefore dream ftlll of Pauls rcbaptifing thefc 12. Difciples, baptifed of Johny that fo you may ground your dipping again, of grown perfons, baptifed be- fore of us. I muft in a word tell you, That John his, and Chrift his baptifme differ not in the nature and fubftancc, which is one and the fame in both, and both but one and the fame baptifme ; as to the Effence, fthcy differ indeed in Circumftance, John baptifing into Chrift, as to come and to fuffer , and Chrifta Apoftles baptifing into Chrift, as come and fuffercd.^ If you alledge the words of John* againft this , Matth.$. 1 i. I baptife you with WatiYy but be that cometh after me> fhall baptife you with the Hely Ghoji and with Fire9 it is but a poor fhift, to fhift off that to the baptifme of John and Chrift, which is put upon the perfons of John and Chrift, for the words carry onely a differ- ence of the Miniftcrs of one and the fame baptifme. John dif- pencing it outwardly in Water by the hand of Man,Sc Chrift di- fpencingit inwardly by the Finger of his Spirit, which is as Fire Its but Popifti fophiftry to compare Johns baptifm with water, and Chrifts baptifme with Fire : Johns baptifme with water, is onclytobe compared to Chrifts baptifme, with water, and then both the baptifme of John and of Ghrift arc but one, both in Authority,for Chrift,Authorifed and Appointed it, John 3 3. He that fent me to baptife with water , &c. was God : as alfo in Ef- fence (as I hinced) for John ufed the right Element and matter, and baptifed with Water ; and the right words or form, invoca- ting the ficrcd Trinity,Father,S jn,and Holy Ghoft,(as appear?, both becaufe it was the form kno /. n to John, and the Apoftles who certainly baptifed many before the death of Chrift, and before 8 one Bapiijitte before that form was fokmnly and t ubllckfy dcclarcd,Mvc up n him , who was the Son of God. So thirdly, th*y were the fame in iff ft and efficacy. For John preached (»»d pa&ifed) the baptifmc of Repentance,.for,orunto, the RtmnTjcn ot Sins, Markg 1.4 the fame which the ApolUcs did m and by their adminiftration of baptifme. And Gflrift '»imre f reftilrth, tl>at the baptifmc of John per- tained to the fulfil ''"orii^hteoufmife, t/taith. 2.15. anci that the Publican*; and i . splc bang bapnfed of Jobn9 J^ftiricd God ; ButthcPharir B Icfpiling th Cc unfel of God,wcre not bap i- fed, Lukf 7 29 Wnercby it appears, that Johns baptifmc, was a part of that A i RiahtecurnefT- 5 apiece otthc whole Ounfel of Godjwhich they that paitakcd of, Juftificd and declared God to be good and righteeos. Were it not fo, the Apoftlcs the mfclves might be queftioned, whether truly baptifed, as who were no doubt baptif d of John, fomc of them being firft his Difciples .• for where elfe mould they be baptifed5fecing Chrift wiih his own hands baptifed none, unl ff one of them (hould baptifc another , which is not proba. ble ? And Laftly> If Johns baptifmc were not one and the fame with ours, that we have of Chrifts , howj do wc injoy the fame comiu"n baptifme with Chrift , who was bapiifed of J.hn ? I: will follow, That Chrift was baptifed with another baptif n than weare,and fo that our baptifmc was notfau&ificd in the pcrfon and flefh of Chrift, {like as the Jew? circumcifion was J and fo it will abate much of our Comfort that we have Chnftun Baptifme, the members one and the fame Baptifme wi'hour head. Thus 1 have driven you off this (hoar of Jordan John Baptiffs Wharf, where you fee you cannot land or ground your dipping ot Chain* i'lf, or y< ur Rcbaptifingof Chriftened people ( is wc fptak.) Though I null w'thall prompt you here, that our Quserc is in tuefe. tcarms twixr Anabapijis and us. Whether the One Bapifm. th: baptifm ot ChriiV fwhich is given to and received by in- font Cirittians or Chrutian mfancs) may be iterated > and you and they bring a Tcxc to(h:w chac the baptifm of Ubn was iterated, whicn as it is not to the fcop:and purpofe, Co neither can you ibe.v the fame was iterated ever in th: twelve Difciptcs, or any other baptifed of Ubn. I fay, fQ long as you hold the bipilra ot Ubn and Chritt, to be two different and re- pugnant baptifme»,_you cannot inforcc upon us from lohns bap- tifmes iterated , f fuppofe fo ;) Ghrifts baptifm to be iterated : It will be bcit tor you thereiore (fee how ftill and ever I am ready to give the belt counfeii L can) to yceld to the identity of both Iobns and Chrifts baptifm as to the nature and fubftance of them , and Co indeed you may argue from the one to the other. Hale in therefore again, your Fly «bpat,to Ubn Baptijis (hoar, and fee if you can land there, any thing to your purpofe, caft on thii right tide your net again into lordanjk catch a frog; Whatfoevdryouget , you then and thus will lofc your new and true friends, the Papifts and Jefuitcs ) for they row hard againft yOu,and thefc throw their nets on the other fide,holding that Ubn and Chrifts baptifm arc very far afunder and differ- ent in the very ElTentials , and do and will accurfc you with Tridentinc Book, Bell, and Candle, and Lantern too of their {hip, (none of which, I -know, 'you, can abide, efpccially not the Book andBellJ and Anathcmarffc all, who fay that Jo** and Chrifts baptifm are the fame for fubftance, and of the fame force. It is like to bs a hot fea-fight,(as moft an end , the hotteft fights are upon the water,, and there is mod fire fpit out) or ra- ther a cold River skirmim twixt you, which, I for my part, do not intend to ftand looking on, though I have fct you to* gether by the ears, but will thus leave you to fight it out to the iaftman, and will paff; away, and on to another Texti preftd and fqucezed by fomc of your party for the Rebaptifing ot bap< tifed ones. h'nHeb.6.2. Where there is mention made, amongft Ci- ther Principles of the Doctrine of Chrift, 'the Doctrine of Fa?- lifmes: Lo, fay they, Here are Bapufmes, in the plural], as well as one Biptifm in the lingular, and ifycur reafonwere good, why the Apoftlc called ir, one Bap i m , becaufe it is to Bob b: IO One Baptifm. be but once given and received, may not we fay (fay they) i.ur rcafon is good why the fame Apoftle calleth , Many Baptifmes, two ac lcaft : and fo, baptife you your Infant; in their Infancy, and we will baptife ours in their growth , when they can make profcflion of Faith ; And fo here are bapti Ones. Tiuely this is fomewhat like the difcourfe the Saduces had with Chrift, about one Woman,, who had feaven Husbands, whofe Wife (he (hall be of the fcaven in the Rcfurrettion. 1 fay and anfwer in Gene; all as Chrif] jdid 5 Are yec not therefore deceived 1 and do err,bccaufe you know not the Scripture ? I could tell you here* of the baptifmes, that of Iokn^nd the ether of Chrift,to be here meant, and (you may remcmber,if you have done fighting with the PapifbJ that we are agreed about them two , to be but one and the fame baptifm : 1 could tell you, that the Apoftle here writing to the Hebrtn>st alluded to their old Legal Warnings, Ablutions, and Baptifmes? minding them of them, butwi' filing them withall to lay them by, and mind the enc Evange- lical baptifrr, and the fprinkling of Chrifts bJocd, the which they did but typifie or look at ; So frill but one baptifm. I could tell you, that the baptifmes here meant, are thofe ( 1 muft fpeak three words more of Human Latine, for the words fake, be* caufc of the elegancy of them) flumims>Flawinisi Sanguinis: But I will turn them into divine Englifh words for your fake, of Water, Fire, Blood ; For there, as Ifaid before, is an out* ward baptifm, which is the warning of the fkfh with Water by the Minifter : and there is an inward baptifm, which is warning of the Soul with the blood of Chrift by the Holy Ghoft, thefe are baptifmes indeed, and here meanr, but in all Gods true Chil- dren, they meet in one baptifm, and they come from God, as one baptifm > entirely made up of thefe two forti, the outward and inward: for that baptifm, which is of blood, mentioned byChrifU and mentioned to his two Difciples, {are ye able to he baptifedwith the baptifm I am baptifed with*) and refolvcd icrthem^je /ball indeed be baptifed with fuch baptifm) Matth.20. 22.1c is nothing but a conftant fuffcring and cor.flifting in Chrifts caufe , even unto Blood , and the fuffcring of Martyrdom for. hi? fake. B jt 1 will call in again for Beza, whom as before I ftilcd an interpreter of .Lukf.y and that Text Acts 19. 5. according to his "I ■ -— ■- One Baptifac. ir bis heart, (Though hcconkfT:d, he learned the interpretation of Marnixiui) ) fo here alfo I mav ft He him an interpreter of Lukf aga;n, and of this Text, Heb. 6. 2. according to his heart, the which interpretation alfo he learned of Calvin^ who fakh to this purpofe, an into prefer of tho& Apoftlcs and Prophets he commented upon, according to their hearts, (though here Beza doth not acknowlegr fo much ) There was a right and Cuftom in the Church Primitive of adminiftring many bap- tifmes, upon certain fetdayes ; which fet d ayes were after ap« poyntcd, to be Eafterday and Whitfunday efpcciall, , when ma- ny CaBehumcns and New Converts were wont to meet toge- ther for bapcifm 5 Thcfc therefore were called, Dayesof Bap- tifmes,as appears out of the writings of the Anticnt both Greeks and Latincs, fo (till it was but one , and the lame baptifm was conferred upon every one, though called baptiimes, becaufc fo many received baptifm together upon one day, like as fome- time in London^ fix or feaven,and more Children partake of bap- tifm together at one time. And now, Sirs, are you Matters in Ifraelznd know not thefe things ? arc you Dippers, and know not thefe Baptifmes * and wheras for the time ye ought not to be Teachers , for that yc have need that oncTcach you which be the firft Principles of the doctrine o* Chrift, learn, that this doctrine of Baptifmes, Is the third of them the principles, and that it contained nothing of two Biptifmes, our baptifingChtiftiansborn in their infancy and your baptifing Chriftians born in their grown ?g ,and lea ft of all, for your rebaptifing our baptifed Intants, when you have made them yourProfclytes upon aconfeflion of Faith. What though our Children be baptifed in ignorance ti God, they are yet baptifed in Covenant with God; if that beareafon with you, they muft be dipt again, and rcbap;ifed when they come to knowledge, why were not the Apoftlcs fo, when better in- ft.ufted, who were ignoranr of the Mediae, and his kingdom, the death, the refum&ion of Chrift f will y< u put your felf Sir, or your learned Dipp:rs themfclves upon the tryal!, and if you be found ignorant of divert* principles of the doftrine of Cht ift, and even fundamental poynts, will you be ioftru&cd, and Rcdippcd ? AUfifc, Sirs, if as often as God fhall ftj.-w you the errors of your Minds, and the enormities of your lives, you B b b 2 muft 12 One Baptifme. mult be dipping & rcdipping,dripping &redripping,evcry Year, Moneth, and Day.No,there is another baptifm to be ufed in thefe cafes,e\ e the warning the foul with the tears of repentance,dip &: re-dip,drip & re- drip in thcfe,and renew your repentance dayly. With what a bold face, Sc high hand dare you, Sir, be either dipt ycur feii'now twice,as 5 hear, cr be a dipper of other?, again, (as you intend) of thofe whom you have inveigled & feduced away into your Scifm, & Hercfie, being before rightly & validly bapti- fed?is not this a multiplying & fo a vilifying of that 6: baptifm ? What example have you in all the Word of God, of any Infanc jew re-eircumcifed, when he came to an ability of profefting Faith? and will you tempt God, to put a yoak upon the neck of the Difciples of Chrift,which neither our Father?, nor we were able to bear ? Telling us, it is needful to baptifc baptifed Chrifti* ftians again,when they come to be belie vers, w he it was not need- ful, yea finful, to circumcife Jewes circuntcifed,when they came , to be the like ? Even when Zipborah a Woman had circumcifed ixod. 4. her child, Mofes himfclf allowed it for good and Iawfull, and' never did he or any other iterate that circumcifion in pre- fent, or afterwards, upon the profeffion of its faith; and when a- ny went over from being Samaritans , who worfhipped they jo tin 4. ^n£W n0(. w j^ ^ag W^Q ^ncw nQt jc^ug Chrift^to become Jews, or came over to Chrift , and to the faith of him, none of them were ever baptifed again , as Belcevcrs. Your duplicate of baptifrr, doth not only oppofc the one and fingle baptifm of the Apoftle, but brings Chriftans under a Tax, and laycth a new yoak upon their necks, as I faid before. BefidesjTo be baptifed,is to be born anew,into the Church, & no man naturally can be twice or often born3every Nicodemus can fay, Can he enter the fecond time into his Mithirs Womb and be horn i lahn 3, Why then twice baptifed, .being once baptifed fufficiently and truly ? By baptifm, Children arc admitted into the heavenly fociety of Saints; and no man civilly can be adopted often into any Gee&fo 48. ones ftock or family 5 Ephraim and Manages were but oncca- dopted and a (fumed by lacob^nto his frock for hisChildrenjand why then twice baptifed ft When of Married Perfons, one forfakes another, & returns a<- gain into Love, & both are reconciltd, they do not enter into a ntw One Baptijme. 1 3 new conjugal Covenant , by any folemnc Celebration of new efpoufals, becaufc the firft conjunction ftands firm, the reconciliation made } The baptifm of Chriftian?, if, as the celebration of the Contract betwixt them and Chrift the Bride* groom ; when fuch a one, through open abnegation , or other hainous (ins departing away from Chrift,returns again, with aid by a fcrious repentance , there will be no need of being baptifed again, and fo a new fealing of that Covenant, which being once entred into, is ftill in force and vigor, and by a pious recorda* tion thereof, the Penitent may confirm his Faith, asPero*did: and by vcrtue of the fame, once eftablifhcd Covenant , God rccciveth fuch to mercy and grace 5 otherwifc the infidelity and impiety of man would fruftrate the goodncfle and good will of God, the matter teftified in baptifm, which it cannot, be* caufc it is conftant , and changethnot, and therefore it is a horrible prophanation of it, to reiterate baptifm. In a word, Second baptifm was ever abhorred in the Ortho^ dox Church, as a kind of inceftuous Birth, and if you iterate ic3 and baptife your beleevers again upon their profeffion of faith, you muft be able to make their former baptifm void, and no baptifm* which you can never do, as having all things therein which God rcquireth unto Infant baptifm, Though Faith, a potitivc and a&ual Faith, asyou call for, (hould net be there, which is not required of God, and therefore is denyed of us to be a ncceflary condition rfquifite to be found Stmanifcft in every one that is to be baptifed : Indeed in an Mtkiopian Eunuch^ an elder Gentile it is , and therefore when he faid, fee here is water, what doth hinder me to be baptifed, Philip anfwered. If thou belceveft) With all thine heart,thou maift) who anfwering, 1 bzlcevc that Jefus Chrift, is the Son of God,and fo Philip bap- tifed him, AilsS 35,37, The oncly Argument thcAnabaptijls triumph in5I (hall here give a (hort anfwer to : Infants of Gentiles^ arc not oisAbrahams ked^ either according to the flsfh, becaufe not hms ; or according to the promife,becaufe not beleevers ; therefore not to be baptifed, whileft Infants, or if they be, to be baptifed again, when bclce« vers. Bat I anfwcr.Firft, The consequent is denyed, for Simcn ■ Magus * and thoufands more, even of them that you biptife5are neither. 2. Nor is it true that onely lews , arc Abrahams Bbb 3 feed m ji«.»iti> 1 4 Infants not to be accounted 'Unbelievers. feed according to the fl.lh i tor tnat part of the Genulc*(jtf/he Children of Sarah, to thofc Gcnt\U~Gala>iaHS) who were juitificd by faith. Nor 3, Is it true that oneiy bdecvers, actually bdecvcrs(as you fp.akjare the Children of the promife, for thus they do not on.ly at this one blow, beat down all Chriftian infants from all intereft in Chrift, and title to hcaven,aud make thtm like as the Heathen*, and Pagans f who ytt are not wont to ftrike io hard ) yea, and which is more, all Jew (h Infants, Ifaack,, lacob9 and Iofepb 5 thefe muff not be, with them, nor were by this 1 talon, Children of the promife in their Childhood, but only according to chc flcfti , untill they did actually bcliev e9 and fo became Children of the promife : And more abfurdity yet doth follow hcncc,thac thofe Patriark? whom I named (Abraham is to be here excepted) by their infant- circumcifion, had no promife of grace fcaled unto them, but were under a Covenant of wort*, and until the years of difcrction and actual faith, were incapable of any inter* eft in the Covenant of grace : II onely true belce vers and the Eleft pcrfons be undsr the covenant of grace, & have right to the Sacraments s why is the fame Covenant of grace in the outward adminiftration thereof, loth in preaching the promifc9, and ap- plying thcSealcsofihe Sacraments, to be propounded by Godg appointment to all the outward vifi le members of the Church? And why was Simon Magus baptifed , as I faid 1 'Tis true. the inward fa ving grace of the Covenant in both Adminiftrationt is by th? Holy Ghoft conferred onely upon the invisible members of Chrifts myftkall body, which are the true bclccvers and cleft; Bur we not able to difcern of thefe , give the out waid baptifm to all thofc, I mean all ou» ward members of the viable Church; You muftdofo, for th. Texc before alL-ged out of the Acts , (hewcth, that all they who have any degrees of Faith, may and ought to be baptifed. Bdt Sir, will you (land to your own Tackling, The bapti- fing of bclceYcr6 ? hereby you think and intend to exclude In- fants Qfthafdrrh-of^nfimts-. -^ — ~ f§ f ants of Chriftians ; What then will you make ofthem,Inirdclss or Beleevers ? can you (hew any Text of Scripture old or ncws where any Infant of lew or Gentile in Covenant with God, is Co filled ? or can you give any rcafon oi it r That which makes an Unbeliever, muft be a pofitivc habit of uubelccf s to juftifie this in an Infant, will be a task too hard for you, and to fay that Infants do not bclceve in aft, or have not the habit of faith ondy negatively, will not in the Language of the Scripture de« nominate an Unbelcever. Indeed thofc that are made Chriftians of Heathens, they mufl give fome pofitivc and actual expreffions of their faith, before they be baptifed , (fo Philip required of the Eunuch) and not till then are they to be accounted beleevers : but for fuch at are born Chriftians of Chriftians, as our infants are, being cntred into and under a gratuitall Covenant with God, we admit them unto the Initial Seal of that Covenant, which is baptifm, with- out any fuch Tcftimonial Aft of Fath , as you require ; for they are not Infidels or Unbclcevers ; but beleevers , and with« in the compaffc of your words (though not your fenft) the bap- tifm of beleevers. Seeing you can produce no fcripture againft their Faith, I will fee what I can do for their Faith , Mattb.it. 5, 6, ("Turn to the Chapter and Verfcs, and read them, and look to your Neck, in that Verfe, it is a N:ck vcrfe) Wkofo Jhall offend me of thefe little ones which beleeve on me, it were better for him that a Mijlone were hanged about hit neck, , and he were drowned in the depth of the Sea. (Lord what fhill become of thofe, that offend all thy lietle ones, by debarring and excluding them from their birth- privilegc,and their Right »baptifn >) But that 1 aim at, as to you, Sir, is, that you would take notice that our Saviour Chrift , who beft knew, knowing the very fecrcts of the heart, pro. nounceth of fome little ones, little Childrcn}fuch as he took ouc one of them 8c Cct down in the mid ft of the Apoftlcs,for a pattern of Humility and Harmleffenefs, That they did beleeve in him 5 its apparent that (howfocver fomctimes and clfewhcre, fpiii- tuall Children are meant by little Children, fuch as arc of a meek fpirit, little in their own eycs,J here and at this time, Vvry natural Children in age, and little in growth, or ftatu.ee, are fpoken of, as the very context and Antithesis do (hew. They 1 6 Of the Faith of Infants, They who do fo interpret this place, do make this not the fame ftory with that which followeth, in Adatth. 19.1 3. Where little Children are (aid too: brought to Chrift, it may be, in their Mathers armes, and Co might be lefor Children than thefe. But the word in the original, for little Children, is the fame in both Chapters fthe likcalfc in Murke 10. 13. (andicsacknow* ledgedby aU,that both in Mathew ip. and Marke 10, Little Children in age and ilature are m.-antj and belide?, fuch little Children in age aniftature, were fitteft to be ex imples of Hu- mility and Innocericy ( the thing intended ) to the Apofdes, than either greater Children or grown men, who many time?, ctt tUibbom and 'harmful I : And though in Vcrfc 6. where they fire faid ( To bffleive in me) little ones be mentioned without little Children, k is to mean tx*gefis or further explication of the word, Children, that they were little ones, and fmall one?, (though fuch as could come to Chrift upon his calling cft'icm , which mak-'th no difference in point of the one or the orhersjbe'eevingin him.) Laftly, when Chrift faith, Who fo pa'l receive; cne fuch little Child in my naym^receiveth me ; But who fojbull offend one of thefe little ones, &c. The very Antithefis or oppofition fheweth, that he fp;aketh not of divers forts of little Children, but one and the fame. And fo forewarnetb, in this i&h Chapcer,his Difciples, that they mould not bef, as hefore- favv they would br, in the 19th. Chapter, offenfive unto fuch lit- tle Children, who were fo notwithstanding. But :»f this be not a Text evident enough for their Faith (as I will not be com tentious, but lubj.cl: my Spirit to the Spirit of the Prophets,) Jet another witnefle fp:ak, Acts 18, 81 Crifpus beleeved on the Lord with all his houfe. If there was any Infant there or young- Jim* (as moft likely) it iB faid to bcleevc. Yet our Saviour Chrifts Hnglingout of Children, to be f samples of Humility and Inno- cency, hi- sccfpting of favor (Hewed to them as done to himfclfj hit prohibiting any orF.nce t© be done tothcm5aIl in this 18 th. of ■S line Matthew* together wich his checking and rebuking of his £) fc;p'(;?,for forbidding them to be brought to him, or to come to h'frr'j*?; taking the** tip in hi; At&esJ'ay&ig his hands pftn\hemi fir>d U not all thefe (fceW a great deal o\ Com- ceiKy thst Chriii Inn, and took in iherrij snd thsr ihefe lit- tle Children pk'akd him very v til j acd therefore kire-werc not of the Faith of Infants. t ~ not unbeleeversjFor without faith it is impoffible tepleafe God. Heb. i £.6.Beiidesthat he pronounccth that of fuch alfof little Infants in age and ftaturej is the Kingdom of God : but the Kingdom of God is not of unbelccvers. Sure fomc of thefe little Children, nay more* fomc of our little Infants, dying before they arc baptifed , are faved, and received of God into his Kingdom, whither no unbeleever, nor unclean, can come or enter. Laftly, I read of two Examples, one in the old Teftament of Jeremy 1.5. Of whom the Lord faith, Before thou camefi out of the VVowbylfanctificd theet and I ordained thee a prophet. Another in the new, of John the Baftift, who being bat a Bibe in the Womb of Elizabeth, leaped for joy of the approach of Ghrift then aUb in the Womb of the Virgin (which joy there- of, was an aft of the Spirit in hi m) Add hereto, Jacobs hold- ing of Efau by the heel, which the Prophet Hof 12.3. interprc* teth to be a kind of ftriving with him for the Grace and Bleffing. We cannot think thefc in the Womb, were in Chrift and fo fanftificd one way, and when they came to years of underfhnd- * ing by another way. If Children of Belcevcrs may thus have the Spirit of Grace and Faith, and that before the Sea! of the Covenant,thcn they arc not unbeleevers, but belecvers : Howfo- evcr there arc iome things extraordinary in thefe two examples, yet I have (hewed, that the Spirit of God is an internal ordina- ry Agent and means in the Church of God , and as to the In- fantile nature and condition , ( which from the two former examples appears- to be capable of it) doth where it pleafeth infufe Faith and other Graces, as before, Humility, MeckncfTe, Innoccncy, Patience, ( whereof little Children were alio fet for examples by our Saviour Chrift ) I do not fay that any In- fants now have the Spirit and Graces of the fame , in fo ample and largeameafurc, as thofc above named, as who wcrefan- ctified and confecratcd in a more fpeciall degree, for a more fpe- ciall work : nor do I fay that all Infants, now under Covenant, have the Spirit, and this Grace of Faith, and othcr,but that they who arc the Eleft of God,and ordained to eternal life (of which there arc many) have Faith and the Spirit, fo far forth, as is fiif* fieient for their Salvation, Acts 1 3. 48, But I will fall upon this pr>ynt more clofcly ; and if fas I have in part already, out of the Tows alltged) lean evince this, of Ccc Infams ! 3 of the Faith of Infants, Infantg'Faith (I mcan,and fo muft you, of Infants in fpcciality, or in kind fomcofthcm, fuchashc purpofcthto favc, and not oflnfants individually,and in particular every oncj Infant* Biptifm muft needs be alfo evinced. As Paul faith to Agrippay about the RefurreiYion of the dead , fo may I to you. Why fhould it be thought a thing Incredulous with you , that God fhouldgive Faith Unto Chriftian Infants > They have knowledge and other Faculties of the Mind, and the Soul , and why may not they have fupcmaturalGracc,and fofomc feeds of the habit of Faithj according to their modcll and meafurc, for the appre- hending of Chrift, and fo Faith it fcK hi i kind, and in a like k'mdjUnto that is in grown perfons* (Faith wherefoever , is alike* and but one in kind, the which how (mall foevcr, fufficeih to Salvation. ) What , doth the weakncfTc of the Organ of Body or Soul, make it impoflible for God to work fupcrnatural- ly even in the little Children , at leaft fo much illumination of the Mind, (more than is ordinary for that age) as may befit to ■ receive the Grace of Chrift \ I (hall tell you more Sir, than 1 bc- leeve you know, and I know you will belcevc. Such Infants whom deccafing, God taketh up into heaven, (for of fuch alfo is the Kingdom of Heaven, as Chrift faidj) he filleth in a mo* ment, and at an inftant, with an inundation of knowledge and under (landing of Chrift ( for they come to fight and vifioa of him ) more than you and I have, nay more than all the Prophets and Apoftlcs had , whilcft they lived upon earth. And now cannot the fame God immediatly before, fprinkle tHeir Souls with one jot of the knowledge of Chrift, or one grain of Faith ( though but as Muftard-feed)and make them to touch Chrift,though but with the T«p,or Fingers end of that hand ofthe foul, which is Faub, whom they fhiil immediately have the full fruition of, like as many as touched the Hem of hii Garm:nt» were made pjrfe&Iy whole 1 But I remember me, you muft have plain di reft Scriptures for this point, one you have had ; and To you (hjll have more Set ipturci,out of which, it may be plainly, and direftly evinced , Infants Faith and Salvation by It, which is all one. Doth not David fay and teftiflr, Pfal. 8. 2. cut of the mouths of Habes and Sucklings , ha\\ thou ordained, or founded (lrengtb9 or perfected praife 1 and doth be not, Pfal.ifi. 12. call upon and exhon of the Faith of Infants. 10 exhort old men and children , topraife the name of the Lord / the w kick you cannot expound of fpiritual children onc!y;(ai fon e- timesitmay, and fomew here) for Mat. 21. 15, 16. they arc re- al, and bodily children, that cm d Hofa nna to the Son of David, and fulfilled Vavidi Speech ; now if there h-d no Grace, Know. ledge, or Faith in Chrift, how could they fo gloritic and praife Chrift, and rejoyce, and even Triumph in Chrift ? 1 ask again, arc any Infants in Chrift ? or ingrafted into Chrift? or the Children of God ? iffo , aiyou cannot deny ir> for rre arc all one inChriji Jefus, whether bond or fret, wale or female , old or young, father or Children, And God the Father hath given to Chrift,Infants and Children-, as well as Parenti and-Fathcrs : and to thofethat Chrift hath received of his Father, he gives cten nal life. But now they are all the Children of God, by Faith in Cbriji Je- fus; andiftheybeCkrijis, then are they Abrahams feed, and heirs according to the pomife, Galar. 3.2^,28 if any man have not the Spirit of Chrift, be is none ofhu, Rom. 8. 9. and he that is none of his> Chrift B ptizrth not. But Chrift Baptireth, with the in- ward Baptifra a fo, untoRemiifion of Sins,rnany Infants, Scthefe are Tome of his, as who hath taken them into Covenant, to be. the God of them , and them to be the Children of God. And furcly if Chrift mould not impart unto fome Infants, Know- ledge, and Faith, according to their meafure Competent to Salvation, but only to the Adult and grown perfons , he might feem to be an Acceptor both of Agci, and perfonages , which he isnot,I>f«t. 10 17 Rom. 2. 11. See John 635. and 37. He that commeth to mejhall not hunger, and he that beleevetb in wefball not thirft, immediately Chrift ad- dcth, ypbatfoevcr the Father givetb me, Jball come nnto me* or be- lecve in mc ; I ark y u now, ar d Q_sere you , hath not the Fa- ther in hi* everlafting Conn fid aod Bounty given to Chrift, all his Eleft Infants, and appointed them to be Chrifti, when Ffa L 2. 8. the Lord (aid unto- hit% thou art my Son, this day bavel begotten thee, as kjf me ^ and I Jhall give thee tbt Heathen for thine Inheritance, and the me,moft parts of the earth for thy poffeflion / if fo, why then, they alfb, Infants, being fome what 01 that what- focver given unto Chrift,' (hall come, and do come continually unto hirn, or bclccvcin him, whatever you Ly, or write to Ccc 2 the. 20 °f the Faith of Infants, the Contrary, that they neither (hall, or do believe. Sec Galat. 3. 22. the Scripture hath ftmt up all things under fin, that thepromife by Faith, in Jefus Chrift, might be given to thofe that believe ; you hear the difeafc, of fin, in Adam is fprcad over all things , that is all msn , and whatfoever is of and in man* even Infants ; therefore the Remedy of Faith in Chrift , muft be fpread over them too, that this may be as generall andlargeas that, fo Infant?, who arc faved, muft and do believe in Chrift. Sec 17. John 3. This is life everlajiing to know thee, the onely true God, and him whom thou haft fentyjefus Chrift. Here is a Gene- ral and univerfal Rule given by Chrift himfclf, the Author of "Salvation, without any inkling, or tinkling of exception, for evcrlaftinglifetobe attcined,namely by knowing and believing ( for that is alfo included in-itjas is fpecified and more enlarged in the I John 5. 10, 11,12. He that hath the Son, hath life, this life is in the Sr.n , and he that believexh , hath this wimefs in him- felf, &c. Now I Q acre you again, Hive any of the ELtt Infants, the Son of God , have they etcrnall life ? you cannot deny it, and therefore you cannot deny them fomc fpark of Knowledge and Faith. Sec 2 Cor. 5 , 7. We walhjy Faith, and not by fght, and 1 Cor. 13.12. now we fee through a glafs darkfy % but then face to face* whence it appcareth , there is but one wav of joyning us all to Chrift, andofur enjoying of Chrift^ wMch is, Sight of him in Heaven , or Faith in him upon earth , to which Sight , our Faith now is anfwerabie, being of the fame nature and quality, onely difF. ing in the nvafure 5 for Futh is Nothing rife but a fight of him, John 12.44. and 4 N -w I Qjztc you again, do nor. you think, but ihc (ame way which icrvc h for all the reft of Gods E!cc> .doth fa ve for Children alto,to joyn 'hem to Chi HI? and that there isbuf one life begun here, which is pcrc&cd in heaven, according to that, He that believetk in we hath eternal life, John 6. 47 Then ilfb iriilR Infants have foaie light of :he mind, to fee an i behold Chrift now here, as in a looking glafs, fo hereafter face ffci f-ce. See Rom. 4.. 6. To all Abrahams fced thepromife is firm by Faith, and h s Title is, rh- Fader of ihcFaith'tfl* the Scripture maketh him the Father of us all, and -11 rh^ Children of rhc prwmife. 0^0 The whole number ofGodsEleft (for of that Primary of the Faith of Infants, 2 1 Primary caufc ot oar Salvation, Gods holy Ek&ion, Saint Faul there difputcth, Rom p, 8. which is obfervable againft the Ana- baptifts, who impute the Sdvation of Infants folcly to Gods Election, which is acknowledged of us to be the Primary catifcj whereas in that very place, he mentioneth a fecondary caufc of their Salvation, thaj they are the Children of the promifc, and lb reckoned in Abrahams Teed, becaufc of that Intcrcft they have in tfcut blcffrd Seed, in whom Abrabamtand all his pofterity are parrakcr*of the holy inheritance.) Now 1 Quaere you again here, do you, or dare you exclude Infants from being Abrahams Secd,you muft then alfo bar them from having intereft and part in Chrift j if not, why do you, or dare you to deny them Fairh > freing that in the fame manner as Abraham obtained the Blefliig ( winch was by Faith) fo muft all Nations of the world,Jcws &G:ntiles,and every particular per- fon, all and as many as lay under the curf: before, even Infants therefore, obtain the Bhffing by Faith, according as it is, Gal 3, 8.13,14. What ftnuld I run on thus? your Tetf will prove as much for me anon,and againftyour fclf,for in your confutation or rather con* lidcration following upon ,/fia 2. 39 there you fay, That no- thing but Faith anfwereth the promitc ; and I (hill tell you that Faith anfwereth it, as the condition : If then there be no otheF way or means for Infants to come by Righreoufnifs, or Salvati- on, but by Faith or believing , ( the condition of the Covenant of Grace, and the Gofpel, as works and doing wa^ofthe Co- venant of Nature and th' Law;)/o« muft either grant fome In- fants to believe and hav; Faith,or elk leave them d.-ftitutcof the ordinary way and means, or. (hew from Scripture (omc other,o,f their Righteoufnefs and Solvation. Yea it Infants be faved with- out Faith, they muft then be faved without Chrift : for as shcrc is none other name or pcrfon under Heaven given arr Ojgft o ca,_ whereby we muft be laved, than the Lord ]cfu«, AH.. 4.12. So there is none other means or grace under Heaven, given amongft men, whereby we may apprehend the Lord Jefus, five Faith, M*tth.$.i6. zndHeb. 11.4. Rimeniber your own word?, no- thing but Faith anfwereth the Promife: If Infants have no F«;hh to anfwer the promife, nor works to anfwer the precept , how fiial they do for the anfwer of a good confciencc towards God,oc Ccc 3. a 2 2 Infants Faith not dijcernd no bar to Baptifm a faving B.'pti f m,i Vet. 3.21? Of what frwl| they do vv hen God rifstbup? and when be vifireth, what fhall they anfwer him> Job 3 1 . 14, If ht will contend with thcm,they cannot anfwer him one of a thoufand,, Job. p. 3 unlcfs inChriftby Fafth they be, and then all is anfwcFcd. . I could wifhfornc ethers of a mo; c "vigorous body and brain, would profecnte thefe and many o- thcr Scriptures to the proof of Faith in Infants, Eleft and faved, the which ( as I take it)would beft flop the mouthes of the gain* fayers of Infant* Baptifm j who now, not fathned with their be- ing in Covenane with God alfo, or hii giving of fptritual grace to them, never leave calling for Faith, Faith in infants ;fo would it fct opener and wider, the way of Infants to their Baptifm^vcn in the opinion of the adverfarics thereof. Ifyou queft ion how fuch could believe in Chrift } Chrift who tells you fo, gave them to do fo , and fo may give to others. Is thine eye cvill , becaufc he is good ? may he not do with his own as him pleafcth ? Take that thine is and go thy way , it may be he will give unto his Icaft, even as to thee. Though Infants want the outward Means of Faith) which they are not ca> pable of, as the Hearing of the Word, by which Faith ordinari- ly is gotten, yet there are other betides; what, you will fay, extraordinary > and fo, you will fly now your (elf to txiraordi- narics, who have taxed us of excraordinaries > no fuch matter } for beftdes the ordinary outward Means of Faith in the Church, which an Infant wanteth , and is not capable of, there are ordi. nary inward Means of the fame Faith, which it may find, and of which it is capable, namely Chrift, the Author of Faith, and the Spirit of Faith , both thefe are internal but ordinary Means of Faith in the Church, and avaylable, when the outward arc wan* ting, and the outward una vayleable, where thofe inward arc wanting. But you can difcern no fuch matter of Faith in Infants, thefe fhew no fuch thing as Faith, what then 1 what evidence or cxpreflion do you fee, or they (new of a reafonablc foul in them? by this reafonyou may conclude them, unrcafonsble, as well as unbelievers : Even Childrrns fouls are equal, and like as yours and mine are in the eflcntiils, which are as large and ample to all intents and purpofes ( though pent up for want of room) as our fouls arc, and arc capable ©f Grace. They are Rational Creatures, Scminally , and in the inward Principle of human Nature, In f Ants Faith not difctrrid m bar to Baptifen. 2 3 Nature, which is a reafonable Nature, though through deleft of age, they are not Rational, Productively , and in the fruits, or external proceedings, or operations of rcafon; and €0 they may be Believers, as to the Root and Fountain of Faith, the Spirit of God, in the firft aft * though they may want the fecond aft thereof, which is the incrcafc of it in thcmfclves , and the deri- ving the knowledge of it to others. So then Infants in the Church, may have Faith,and all the E« left of them have ( for it is called the Faith of Gods Eleft, Jit. 1. 1.) and you as you cannot defcry it in them, foyou cannot decry it. Therefore by your own Tenet and Rule,thcy going for Believers and Eleft , may be Baptized ; yea, all ought to go foy ow of a charitable perfwafion, and opinion that ought to be in us and you, (howfoevcr it goeth with them, as to the Truth and Reality) and therefore all mould be Baptized ; for by the fame reafbn you Baptize any, of thofe you call Believer?, we Baptize all Infants of Beitevtn ; and unlcfe it were fo, none at all were to be Baptiztd : Thofe that comcto you, one by one, in a profcf* fion of Faith, you have but a good and charitable opinion of his Faith and Eleftionj you can have no fure and certain knowledge of the fame 5 ( For thi* and that Perfon , may be an Hypocrite and Reprobate) yet you Baptiz: him and him. Now therefore, may not we do the like ? there comes prefented to us, this and that Child, one and another, in the evidence of Gods Cove- nant engraven (as it were) upon them by their birth of Parents in Covenant ; we have alfo a charitable perf.vafion of their Faith and Eteftion, andean have no more, (tor there ar\? alfo In- fants born in the Church that are Reprobates) and fo we B ip< izc them : But if oncly the true Bcleevers and E!cft were to be B ip* tized, then you and we mufthavc a certain knowledge ofeveiy Infants and every mans Faith and Ekftion,as the ground of our and your Bi prizing them ; the which beeaufc neither we, nor you, can have in any ordinary way, neither of us by this Rule muft Baptize any at all 5 You hope the beft of all, and fo do we; your old Limitation may do well here, fofaras man can judge (which in this cafe is jutt nothing^) and that's all can be faid on both lides j but ftill, I muft prompt you, that it is not knowledge of the Infants, being in Elcftion, and the figns of it, or btiig in the Faith, and the profeffion of it,but the bein£ ia tht Co\oanc and ^4 Infants Faith not difcernd no bar to Baftifm. and a relation to it, that is and ought to be the ground ot Bap- tifm, in the Church of God ; nowbecaufc we find and k> to wall Infants born ofChriftian Parents, within this Covenant Rclati. on C & know not which of them is Elc& or not, forH we knew who were Reprobates , we neither would nor ought to Baptize them, J we do therefore Baptize all of them, left otherwifc we {hould, and might deny the Seal of the Covenant to lome of the Eleft Children of God. Me thinks you, who afTumc (o much of [the Spirit to your fdves, (Take heed, you do not rrefume too much of your fclves therein") there be they who feparate thcmfelves , having not the Spirit, J ude 1 9.) {hould not be Co Covetous or Envious , (and it may be, refiftous, and then, it is,bIafphcmousJas to deny fomc degrees of the Spirit and the graces thereof to Infants, when as the Spirit blowcth where it lifteth, and thou canft not tell whi- ther ic goeth ; when as alfo the Dovcilikc Spirit of God, hath a neer compliance with, and a great complacency in Child- like mceknefs, milc'nefs, humility, .patience (of which graces he is pleafedto ftilchimfelf the Spirit,) more, than with your man- ly,or rather unmanly pride, envy, uncharitablenefs, roughnefs, and pcefumption , whereout it is , that you Co defpife and offend the little ones, 'Withholding them from their due of Baptifm, & rail and revilcthc Churches of God , and the Miniftcrs of Jcfus Cht i(h Thcl'c thing* (I tell you) grieve the good , and mild Spirit of God, and fend it away lad from fuch hearts, and at laft >if prefevered in,wi!I quench its holy fervour?. And I wonder very much, that any people (hould run after you, as they do, who leave their Infants and Children under no better a condition or denomination than of Infidels and unbe- lievers : for foyou tell them, that their condition by nature, and their feed, is the fame which Pagan- Gentiles, and till they know God and believe in him, open and profeffed enemies of God 5 whereas upon their and our nature, that if, natural Gene- ration or Procreation of Seed, there is the Covenant of Grace cftablifhed, and fetup, which you fee at large, Ephef. 2. 3. and 4, ckc. Th2t wc were by Njture the Children of wrath as well asothcrr, when out of Covenant, You prefeft much Scrip- ture, Learn to fpeak in that He ly Language, and to cal Chil- dren of Chriftians, Chriftians by Nature, and not finders of the Gentiles Divers forts ofchriflians* 25 Grntilesor P^gan?; for (o$*inti>anl fpeakttb, Gal. 2. 15. Wc who arc Jews by N iture, and not finrici ? of the Gentiles : (How Jewc? by Nuiin?)b;rcaufe they were the Children of the Pro- phet* and of the Covtn-Jnf , horn under it, AU.\ 25. So arc oin Children, Chriftians by Nature ( how not tinners of the Gcnti!J because born Jewe* had not their (ins imputed to them, (though born in original fin, as the Grntiler,) the Cove- nant being a remedy appointed againll it> and a" means to bring th. m into Gods favour again j and fo are our Children, not fin- ner* of the Gentiles. You that are Parents, and are farefull encugh to keep fure your inheritance?, and joynturesof earthly thing* to you and your Children, fuffer not your Children to be wrangled out of their birth- right, and joy nt inheritance they have with your felvcs in the Covenant of Grace, under the name and notion of unbelievers , when as the Scriptures never calleth them Co , but a holy Seed ; and God hath made you, and you Children joynt- partakers of the Covenant and the Seals thereof. I have been the longer in this, for that I would lay therein fome ground -work, for fomething to follow. I will be very fhort in your next Quaere. Se&ion IL Of Baptifm mahjng Chrijiians^ and how. YOu a? k whether Baptifm makfth a man or woman a Chriflian without Faith, [and following ofChriji in all his Commands and Steps, left upon Record for our imitation ? This is a fhort Quaere, and therefore fhall be foon anfwered, as not feeing to what purpofe it is for you or againft roe, I fhall therefore briffly anfwer fomething to it out of, Row, 1.28. "and 29. diftinguifhing cf the forts of Chriftians, and the parts of Baptifm, as he doth of the forts of Jews, and parts ofCircumci- Uon. As Circumcifion which was outward in the flefh made D d d (though 26 , Divers forts of Chriftians. Q hough I do not here approve of this your word j and therefore 1 will ufe another) (hcweolor declared the Jew outwardly, or theoutwaid J-:w-s fo Baptifm which is outward in theflcfti, fh.-weth o< dccUreth rhs Chriftian outwardly, or the outward Chriftian ; Aad both may be, without F but only mew and declare t hern to be fucb( as I f aidjand teal them as Covenanters. And howfoever a Politic txprcilion of Faith expiicitely be neceffa- ry unto a Heathen Born>for hia Admiflion unto his Chriftianky or Church-memberfaip 5 y ct it is not Co unto a Chriftian Born* for their Chriftanity, or Church-rmmberflhip , is their Birth» Privilege ; and Bap ifm is but their Inftalment or inrolmcntjand is but as the Inauguration or un&ion unto a Prince Born. Faith I confefs, and I mean'faving and juftifying Faith (and fo muft you, Teeing you joyn thereto, the following offchrift in all his Commands and Steps left upon Record for our Imitati- on) is abfolutcly requifitc unto Born Chriftian?, as a Conditi- on to their partaking and enjoyment of the B;m(its and Fruit? of Baptifm, but hot abfolutely required, as the condition to their comming and engaging to the Covenant, to the which they have a good Title and 'Right, without prefent aftual Faith ; unlefs you will affirm that all the Jewcs, who came to Circumcifion, had the like, and all the whole Congregation of Ifrael, man, woman, and child, who Veut. 1 ?. entred into Co- venant with God, had a faying and a juftifying Faith. In a word ; Biptifm without Faith may declare a vifible Chii- ftian , but incompleatly , as without Faith. Faith without Baptifm, may make an invifiblc Chriftian b'ut incompleatly9 as without Baptifm : Faith and Baptifm together, both make a Chriftian compleatly, and that both Vifible and Invifible. Arc not Children of the Heathens born Heathens ? and why then are not Children of Chriftian?, born Chriftians ? I mean, it is their Birthright to be fo eftcemed; or they are to be cfteemed fuch, by their Birth- right, to be reputed within the Covenant of Grace, or members of the vifible Church. Is the condi ion of a Chriftians Child worfc now under the Gofpcl , than a J;wes Child was under the Law { the Children of the Jewcs were born Jewes, and it was their Birth-.right to be Ifraelites , vifible mem- bers of theChurchof Ifrael-, whereupon the Apoftle caJKth them, Jews by Naeure>Gtf/. 5. 15. As before I have faid. and Kovr, 11.24. He calls the whole Nation of the Jew s, the Narural Ddd 2 branches 2 8 To which fort cxplicite faith necefftry branches of the Oirve*tree, in that they were the vifiblc Church of God 5 fo th: I Cor. 7. ThoC: that are born of holy Parents arc called holy, yet timers but in divers rcfpe&s \ by Nature, and as generated of ihc'r Parcncs,fo finncrs, for Parents do not generate by Grace bit Ni(Urc; but By Grace, and as received by God into Covenant, fo Holy, for God faid, 1 will be thy God, and the God of thy Cred, and ii the root be holy , then are ths branchc?, no repugnancy here jlike as the Gircumcifcd generatech an In- fant with a forc-«kin ; and as wheat drcff:d and clean, bringeth forh wheat with charTe upon it 5 To a Chriftian bringeth forth one, that is not a Chriftian, who is therefore Baprizcd that he maybe madeCh.iftian, which is when he is Ingrafted into the bodyofChrift. And whereas th: Apoftle faith, Epk. a. 3. That we were by Nature the Children of wrath,as well as others : it doth not con- tradift, we may be fuch, and yet born Chriftians too, and Holy ioan cxternall Covenant, being born of believing Parents 5 if you would but remember the ordinary diftin&ions that are given, they would difperfe this mift beforeyour eyes, and cleer the matter to you J will give them you ; as thus,as there is a Jew, fo there is a Chriftian without and in open view, of the Church and as Jew, fo a Chriftian within and in fearer, & before the face of God ; as none were born Jewcs, fo none arc born Chriftians in this (ccond and later fenfe, thus we muft be made Chriftians, neither could or can we claim it by Birth- right : but in the firft fenf-, which is Chat whereof the Afikrtion is, we may ; even all that havi a vilible Birth and ftanding under the Covenant of Gracc,arcChriftians,and Holy in the face of the vifiblc Churchy though (perhaps) not fo in the face of God, but many, for all this, may b: Children of wrath. Your mind, as your words, runneth .oncly upon the Internal part of the Covenant, which arc inward faving graces, which belong only to the Elcft; and becaufe we know nor, what thefe Infants arc born wirh, we fay not, that thus they arc born Chriftians ; where you (hould take notice of an external part of the Covenant, which is a true vifiblc memberfhip, and Birth Holinefs, which known to us and appearing to all,we call them born Chriftians as who from their Birth,are to be accounted and reputed vilible members and patti of she Church. For of Baptizing Infants, 29 For the Covenant of Grace is largely to be underftood and. Taken for the whole difpenfation of it in outward Ordinances * and under the Notion of its external Privileges, as well as in in- ward Graces, and under the notion of its internal powers. You moft an end, and in this Quaere efpecially, ufe the Covenant, as Hanundid the Servants otVjvidt fent to comfort Hanun, and to honour hi* dec«afed Father, who ftuvcdcfFthconc half of their Beirds, and cut ofFcht half of their Garments. , and Co f:nt them away, 2 Saw. 10. 4. So do you, and yours > you leave out in your writing and difcourfes, the one half of the Covenant, and fltll reftrain it to the inward and fpiritual part thereof, whereas it was fent whole and entire of God, with an outward and ex- ternal part alfo, for the further Honour and Comfort of the bc» Jievuig Parents and their Children. But 1 come to the laft , your fi, ft Quaere of the three about Bjptifm as you propound them ; but my laft of the three, as 1 handle your matters ; and this it is. Se&. III. Of Baptising of Infant f. \7i7 £far warrant you have from the words ofChrifi for your Bapth zing of Infants before they do a dually believe? What warrant? I thank you for this word , a gentle and general word, I looked for no lefs, than what command or precept have you, fuch a fe- ver€ and fpecial word , as a command , to be demanded of me. Did you keep fuch a bluftring in faren whole Quaeres together, about the commands ind precepts of Chrift &his Apoftles, and thv ir (xampl s, ( which I took as your preparative and Preface, unro this your particular Quaere of IntantBaptifmJ and doih the wind go down , in this foft and ftill voyce , What warrant have you for i^Afrx r all your former Thundrings out the Com- mands of Gel agzinft us, as if we of the Church of Englandhad broken them all , and had pieced them up with our Human In~ ventiom and addition*, as Infant- Baptifm and the reft, is this your only Thunderbolt you h.»vc to ftrike us down with ? what warrant have you for it, out of the word ? Your friends and ftl- Ddd 3 lovvcs* go Infants have faith & inward grace for ought we kno^ &c; ^owes will give you no thanks for this word (if it were not they that save it yO i, word and work and all) who as the Jc Wes cry- cd The Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord, fo they eo'up and down, and cry, a Precept; of the word,, a Precept of the word for your Infant- B-ptifro s and do you come after thtm and behind, and fo fofily (peak, for fear they fhould hear you, a Warrant out of the word, a Warrant out of the word lor the fame* - , , , L ^ L This made me look back over your other Qnsercs about our Miniftery, our maintenance ; and I find upon fuch Review, that this word, Warrant > isufed and prefixed before them ali, and not a word of a Precept or Command. I fee I have been much miftaken, who, when 1 might have put off you and all your CWrcs, with a Warrant, according to your demand, have put my fclf to fuch trouble, as to (earch the Scriptures, and fph a Warrant from a juftice, be a Precept Mifiivc , yet a Permifilve will of God, which is no Precept for it, may be a Warrant of an A&ion ; and fuch are and may be , any folid Reafon, or good Confcquencc or like example drawn therefrom, which though it will not be admitted for a Precept, may fervc for a Warrant. A. firft Warrant, (hall be this Reafon , which is but a rcco!- fr&ion or r-capitulaiion of fomewhat in medlatly faid before. If Infants of Chi iftiartt arc all of them capable, and fome of them partakers of che Spirit, and Faith, and other inward Gr?ct>, r Then Infants have faith ®- inward grace for ought we know^&c. 3 1 Then they may and ought to be Baprized ; This ia warranted out ot the word and thofc Texts, Ail, 8, 3d. *A&. 10. 47. The one warranting Baptifm, to a believer 5 the other *> him, who hath received the Holy Ghoft, whether young or oM, Infant or grown perfon : // Ibou beheveji ( f»ith Philip ) thou may eft be Baptized} when the Eunuch aeked, what doth hindermc ? fo Faith it wai that made him capab?c,and removed the hindrance, though upon his contellioa of his Faith, k being not otherwifc difd-r.iablc, he having no other right pleadable , he being one o the Gentiles, He^was actually Biptiz:d. So can any man forbid water, that thefe fhould not be Baptiz.d, who have recei» vei the Ho'y Ghoftaswc? and fo he Commanded them to be Baptized. That particular Hypothetical , (if thou believeft, &c. thou may'ft be Baptizd) may and muft be refolved into this general Categorical, whoioevcr Believeth, may be Baptized , Man or Childj Young or Old; and howfocver, Cornelius and the reft, their receiving of the Spirit, was in the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit, then manifefting it felf that way, yet any other manifc Ration of the Spirit, any word or aft of God declaring, that Perfons do belong to Gods Covenant, ( as fome or other way, the Spirit doth manifeft itfelf in all that do belong to Gods Covenant) is to as and ought to be to you , a fufficient Warrant without any danger of wiil-wormipto account them fuch, and therefore to Baptize them, be it this pouring out of extraordina- ry gifts,ashere upon Gomelius and others 5 or the ConfeiHon of Faith, as in Philip; or Repentance, as in thofe that came to John theB'ptift; or be it a promife to believing Parents and their Seed, tobt their God, or Gods owning them as Perfons belong- ing to die Church , or any other ordinary Gifts and Graces of the Spirit, or the Spirits fupplying, their infirmities : in thefe cafescan any man forbid water, thattheis mould not be Bapti- z-d? This Interrogative , and efuaeftiompropounding Speech, may and muft be refolved into a NegativetAniwer, abfolutcly : No man can forbid water, rightly ( for that's done, that is rightly done, or done of Right) unlefs he will forbid that,which God hath Commanded r and fome of thefe we have abundantly for the Infants of believing Parents ; where no man can forbid, there God Commands j that they, who have received ih" Holy Ghoft, 3 2 Infants ofchrijiian Par. m Covenant with Cedi therfore Bap* GMoltj ihould be B-ipf?z:di The rciuk ailo out or chi»,is ibis ge- neral Propofition, whofoever ( whether Infant or grown Per- fon., ) hath received, the Holy Ghoft ("whether apparently or feaedy,ordinarilyor miraculoi fl/, whether in figtu or Faith) hatha right toBaptifrr, no man can forbid it ; and in one of the particuhis, Peter hereCcn n andsit. See, hew I havegrat fitd yov-, btyond a Warrant, with a little lefs than a Conmand tor the Baptizing of lnfants,ii having Faith and the Spirit, is many, yea, all the Ele& of them have, whom, we notable to know one from the other particularly, do therefore Baptize all under the Covenant with God. More briefly and iyllogiflically thus take It, as I recollect it. AllPcrfons who have received the Holy Spirit, or have Faith, are Commanded by God in Scripture to be Baptiz.di as appears by the two Texts here cited. But fomc Infants of Christians have received the Holy Spirit, or have Faith 5 as appears by many Texts formerly cited. Therefore fome Infants arc Commanded by God in Scripture to be Baptized. A Second Warrant, is This Reafon. Ii Infants of Chriflian Parents, be in the Holy Covenant of God, and have the fan t engraven upon them, and cftablifhed with them, Then they arc to b; Baptized, and to receive Baptifm as the initial fcal thereof: This Reafon is warranted, or this warrant may be reafoncd out of ihcwoxd,Gen.iy. f. &c. and Kent, 4. II. for its there appa- rent (and the light there mining dazzles all Antipaedobaptifts, they cannot abide to look thereon) that as Abraham and his Profelytc?, grown men,upon their profcfiion of their Faith, were Circumcifed, fo the feed or Children of Abraham and thofc Pro- fclytcf, were Circumcifed as Children of Parents in Covenant, and joyned together with them in Covenant ; and both thefc are there cxprtfly Commanded 5 and fo this alfo, that the feed of Abraham-, and his Profclytes mould be Circumcifed, by vcrtuc and reifo.i of Gods Covenant with them, which was to be fca- Icd unto them by Circumcifion. Now as the Being of Infants in Covenant under the Law , made them capable of, and gave them a due Right to Circumcifion, the Initial feal of that Co- venant under the Law j Co the being of Infants in Covenant un- der Infiinttofchrijlian Vat, in Covenant with God therefore bap. 33 cierthc Gofpe!, makes them capable of , and gives them a due or Right to B iptifm , the initial feal of the Covenant under the G< fpxl h The Covenant being the lamr, for fubftance, and in re- lation to the eternal wcl. are of the Soul (as in the ikX'I (hall (hew:) which being fo * if Anabapufts palling by thisreafbn from the Covenant, will miitt liitl upon that mccr and folc Conv mand^ment of God , 1 mult tell them, 1 he Text faith not, Thou (halt keep my Comruind, but thou malt keep my Covenant > im* plying, that this Command of Circumcifion had reference to the Covenant, and was part of it. For here God is to be consi- dered, not in his abiblutc Prerogative commanding, but as God in refpeftive mercy Covenanting with his people, andallhis Commands, are to be taken as branches of his Covenant, and all grounded upon his Free-grace in Jefus Chrift, therefore Gen.ij. 10. and 1 3, God calls exprefly Circumcifion by the name of his Covenant, to teach you and all others that will learn , that the Covenant made Infants capable of the Seal, and not Gods mecr Commandement , as you and your notional, and metaphysical Maftcrsdo abftraft, who love to play with your own Fancies and Imaginations, whereas the Seal is nothing but the confirma- tion of the Covenant, and appointed and commanded fotobe of God. But the Covenant, in order of Nature going before the Seal thereof, their being in Covenant, mult needs be the ground of Gods commanding the Seal of Circumcifion. It is acknowledged there was a fpecial Commandement for circumcifing in the time of Infancy ; but do not you blame God for his liich Command, by the fame rcafon you blajve us for our practice? Infants of Jcwes were as much in the ftate of Nature, as ignorance, blind nefs, and under the fame dsfc&s, that infants of Chriftians are; and why do ye not charge the ivifdom of God with foliy, for Commanding the Infants of Jewes to be circum- cifed ? or excufc us who being under the fame Covenant, do Baptize the Infants of Chriftians, In imitation of God, Com- manding Circuit ifi>n , and alfo in obedience of God and that Command, which was in part alfo Evangelica*. For That Co tri j ment was for the Gi$cu#i<$fing of fuch In- fants in the?! \ k' ^y,whofe Parents wf'' -i;o> (? dsf a\ but thereisnofuc' command for \\4 -?•«;. wfr/.'-i P» m • r Sot; fonhefe, Prokifion of Faith w&6 needful! Abraham yea Civ, J . -'•---■ 54 Infants ofC hrijha.fi Far. in Covenant with Cod therefore Bap. the Church oi ihc Jews began) therefore had Faith , before hec took the S:al> bat no fuch thing wag afterward required oi A' hrnhams S:ed, but the contrary Con manded, namely that their Seed (hould be circum.ifcd in their Infancy. And fo 1 deny not, but God Commanded Circumcifion ; but this, that by vertue»£ Gods Commandemcnt onely, they were Circumcifed, I deny, for h was alfo and chiefly, becaufe of the joregeing Covenant in the 7. and 8. v.-rfes, to which thewordt refer, faying, Thou malt keep my Covenant. Therefore (what Covenant? verf. id. Circumcifion , is fo named J He doth not barely C'mnandir, but with an Inference or reference there- fore, to (hew that, they being in Covenant, were therefore ro have the Seal thereof, Circumcifion, which did but put the Co. venant under Seal, in which Covenant thofc Children were be- fore by B'rth, being born of Parents with whom God had ftricken Covenant. But I ftullgonecr to nuke ufe of it anon- for the Baptizing of our Children, like as they and you do ncwy for the circu.ncifiiig of the J^wes Chrildrcn, Though fthc Truth is) that was nothing bur God? word of Inftifu i .n, whofc incommunicable property it is to appoint Sacranrmal SipnSr The Covenant then efpecially was the ground 01 Circumcifin$ the Sredof the Jewes, and the fame is the ground of "Baptizing the Infants of Chriftians: and fo Chriftian Parents , being in Cov.nant, their Infants are in Covenant with God, and there- fore Baptiz^blc ; for Gods Covenant written upon Children of Parents in Covenant, n no Blank to feal too , but a juft Title ( or writ, as ' may fo fay) for the Seal, and a very C o~n minion- given out by the Holy Spirit, for th? Baptizing Infants of Chri- ftians in their Infarcy j arid fo thefe things appearing to the Churches of God, Thai Infants ot Chriftian? are er-rrcd in Co- Tenanr- wiih God, They ought to put the fame under the S;al of Biptifm, a« the Infant? Due, and the Churches Duty. More bricuy and Syllogiftically thus take it,as I recolle&'ir. All perfons within and under the Covenant of Gods Grace, arc Commanded of God, to have the Seal of Covenant put upon them, which in the Gofpel-adminiftration there- of is Biptifm. But all Infants of Chriftian?, arc within the Covenanf'of Godi grace, --^theWorc As Inf. of Jews circumcifed^fo Inf&n.ef Christians baft, o 5 Therefore all Infants of ChriPtians, are Commanded of God to have the S al of the Covenant pat upon them, which in the Gofp:l-Admmiftration thereof is Baptifm The firit Proposition ts clear from Gen. \j. and God Com. mandir.g ail Jews in Covenant to be v^ircumcifed ', and from Matth. 28 andChrtit Commanding ail Gentiles, or Nations in Covenant to be Biptiz rf. Tnc fceond Proportion, 15 the very 7'enour of ihe Cove- nant, I will be thy GoJ, and the God of thy Seed $ and fo 1 have reafonedthe B ptimaoi Infants and Terms, into a Command of God, before I intended it. A third Warrant i* this Rcafon ; If the Infants of Jcwifti Pa- rents, were capable of Circumciiion, the initial Seal of the Co- venant, which was Gircumciiion,and were Circumcifedjthough theycq,y}d (he W no Right they had unto if, but their Birth of Parents in Covenant. Then alfo may, and muft, the Infants of Chriftian Parents, be Baptized and receive Bipiifm, the initial Seal, though they can ftiew no other Right to ir, but their Birth of Parents in Covenant : This Warrant is Reafoned out, or this Rcafon is warranted out of, Heb. 1 3. 0 Jefus Chrift the fame yejlerdjyt today and forever* Jefus Chrift mmiftred is the Cove- nant, which i$(as I faidj the fame for ever in fabftance.and in re- lation to therternal welfare of fouhjThough the min ftrations of him be diff.rent, of him as to be exhibited and to come, unto the Jewes, and of him, as come and exhibited, untoChriftians; And though fome Ceremonial and Circumftantial matters be chang-d, yet the fuoftantial, and tnat which was purely a Co- vcnanrall or Sacramental Part, abides, as being anevcrlaft- ing Go'cmnt made wirh Abraham Seed, all true belcevers: the/ diff r not , the Two Sacraments, in any (ubftantial thing, or in any Tpi ritual fffeft ncccflary to falvation, orinany ufcto confirm the Covenant of Grace, andfurcher a man in the way to Heaven, and fo, as an Initial Seal of the Covenant, they dif- fer aot, nor as a Sacrament of entrance, into the Church > and foCircumcifion was a S=al of rhe fame Rightco.ifnefs by Fait' » as Baptifm is to us, Rom. 4.11. and Circumcilion iigniheJ iru; mortification of the ficfh, and the renewing of the mindful d.d bindover the Jcwcs unto the obedience of Gods will, Rom. 2. 38^ 8cc. Gsl. 5. 21 » and fo doth Baptifm the fame to u* now, as Eee 2 Row, o 6 The Analogy Hwixt Baptijnt and Circumcision, Horn. 6. 3. and 11. 1 Pet. 3. 21. Iafoinuch thatBipcized Chriui- ans arc oiled circumcifed Chriftians ; and Baptifm is called by the name of Circnmciiion, Col. 2 11. and 14 4-Though we Chriftians are not to follow the Jews in things peculiar to his own difpenfatton, which was Legal and Cere- monial; yet thofe aft ions that were done by them upon fuch grounds that arc of moral, perpetual and common concernment to one p:iion , a$w:llas another, in one Church, as well as another, for one age as well as another ; none can deny fuch actions to be binding and obligatory to all, as a (landing Rule for after Generations j by which may be anfwered that which is uf 1 illy objected by thofe that except to our Analogy of B lptifm with Circumcifion, as why do yc not plead a B iptifm of Males oiely \ and that, particular of the eight day, and to car- ry on the whole Analogy together and in order 1- ;why,f becaufe, thefe were but circumftantial things, the two Sacraments rnayjbc one in fubftance for all thefe 5 befides they were not of common, but peculiar ufc to the Jews, that Church, thofe ages 5 as for the eighth day, it w^s both a Ceremonial and Phyiical rcafon , as to life and health of the infant that the fore skin was not cut off till then \ and for the Females not Circumcifed , it is enough a- gainftyou and your opioion,ifthc proportion betwixt Circum- cifian and Baptifm holds b;Jt in the Males , for that will infer theftatc of infancy capable of the Initial Seal of the Covenant of Grace under the G jfpel s and again, under the Law, becaufe of the inconvenitncy and unfimefs of the thing it. fclf to be done upon then, the Femilcs were Circumcifed in the Mates as the Church is circumcifed in Chrift, the Miles bearing.ihe Type of Chriftupon their flefli; and the Males and Females in Matrimo- nial conjunction rcprefenting Chriit and his Church, to w.huh the Apoftlc alludts, E^h. 5 22. and 33. but now fueh a typical difcri mi nation of Sexes^ being removed, Chrift exhibited puts nod'fTereucc in B-iptifui b, twecn Males and Female?, Gal. 3 27 an*'' 18. N ryctdo we A^iTtie f°r Infant- Baptifm, from the bare Anat fogy < f lifaircircunic fion, but from the force of the reafon, that ;Iycth in the performances which holds rot in the circumftances ofUi" eight day and the Fmiale?, as it uoth in this, oi Injgr cy . ' Namely, chat as Infants of the Jews were riitumcilcd9 though thty Jnf, ofje TPsxircHvic. jo It. f ants of chrijiians bapt. g j they declared .10 right they had unto it, but their birth jfo may thclifants ofthe Chri^ians b Bapcized, though^thcy makeno manifestation of" their Faith, &c. but (hew their birth, as Chi] . drcn of Parents in Covenant wich God. Yea the Foundation and oceafion of both , Circumcifion and Biptjfm, were one 8c the famc> of common concernment to all 5 (to addrfomewhac left out before, wherein they differ not 5) namely Gods free eternal Love to his Eleft, and mans mifery by his fall in the loynesof j4dam,znd his birth in pollution from the loynes of his immediate Parents derived to them from the loynes ofAdaw, whence alfo I may argue* the original fins and thcclenfing of Nature by the Spirit of Chrift, arc of Common concernment to Jcwifh and to Chriftian Infants; Therefore Qhriftian Infants ought to be made partakers ofthe Seal of Re- generation in their Infancy* asthcjewifh Infants were ; and Co there.lyeth as much neceljityjn fubftar.ce,yea morality in the duty ibr believing Chriftians to Baptize their Infants,as for believing Jewes to circumcifc theirs j but of this particular, I fhall fay .more prefmtly. 5. If now for all this, you (hall deny and withold Bapiifm from the Irjfants of covcnant-Chriftians , in their Infancy 9 notwith* ftandingthat God granted, yea commanded Circumcifion to the Infants of covenant Jewes in their Infancy, (butby.rcafon ofthe covenant, which God made with the Parents and their Seed. J You muft of neccflity do one of thefe absurdities yea Im- pieties, i.e cither you muft deny Gods covenant of Grace under the Law and thcGofpcI, to be one and the fame for fubftance, and thefe, circumcifion and Baptifn to be,th? Initial Scales of it according to the diverfit'tes of the adminiftrations of the fame, which ifi unrcafonablc and unwarrantable, as is mewed. 2. O. you muft charge Gud with want of wifdom and difcrc- tton in managing his affair?, for choofiig fuch unfit and u.ncapa- ble parties as Infants to make a covenant with and to Seal too 5 which ?«, Irreligious and Imp'ous tod^>. 3. Q you muft prefer the Typical A }mi titration b'frre the Evangelical, and fo advance bljfes above Chrift, and the (hadow before the Siin-Iighr, by denying the Infants ci Gods cov minted peopk under the Gofp:!, ?nd fiocc Chrifh camming t e Initial S-ai ofthe Covenant, and fo nuking the Grace of kfs extent, E e c 3 than 38 As Infants ofjcwes circumci.fo Infants of Chrijkians hap. than thai which Mofes allowed the Infants under the Law, and before the cprmningofChrift , which is unchriftian and un- GofpeMiketodo. 4. Or yon mull put our Children born in the bright day of th: Gofpel,and of more abundant Gracc,into a worfe c it ate and Condi ion, as to the rreancs of their Salvation j if they be paf- fed by the Seal and not baptifed, then the Children were, who were born in the Twi- light of the Law, who were admitted to the Seal & Gircumcifcdjwhich is envious and malicious to do.- 5. Or you mull (hew, that a manifestation of Faith, and tome perfonal rvighecoufnefle, is now more requifite. (Which was onely required of fuch, whofe Parents were not under the Facderal Seal) unto the baptifm of cur Infants, than it was unto the Circumcifien of their Children 5 or that their Chil- dren gave at their Circumcifion , fuch Tcftimony of their Faith and Righteoufneffc more than ours. Which is even foolifh and childifhto think. This Warrant of our Infant-baptifm, from its Analogy with this Infant- Circumcifion, lyeth asfuch a Block in your way, as neither you, nor any of yours, could ever get over, as Ghrirt crucified on the CrofTe, was unto the Jcwcs a flumbling Block. So Chrift miniftred in Circumcifion, unto the Jewes in Cove- nant and their Infants , is to you and all Antipaedobaptiir?, a very ftumbling Block, which whileft they have •ndeavourcd to lift at, and leap over, they have Grained and ftretched and wre- fted Scriptures more than their Armcs, and have broken iheir mins, I mean, their firft Faith and a good Confchnce, making fhipwr ack of both, whileft they fplit upon this Rock,or {tumble upon this Block. But, Sir, I hope better things ofycu, and I have better things for you, as my Friend and Neighbour : I will not Lave ycu in the maze of the five- went way ot the Anabaptifls that they muft walk in;I have a (ingle path and a plain way for ycu,ft you pleafe to take it, and it is this, or none. 6. Ycu muftyeeld in Modcriy and Humility* as k becomes you, to beleeve fuch parties, Infants of both Tcftamems to be inablcd by God, with foiue proportionable Grace, for the Co- venant and Sea^s, in a way acceptable to himfclf. Though ycu cannot fee it, nor have Capacity, (I will not fay Ingenuity J to ack now- Baptifm to free thtmfrom original fin. 3 9 acknowledge it, and to clear off all Clouds of Doubts and Quaeres, which you or others have railed up and gathered to. gcthcr, about the manner and manifeftation thereof, and for this purpoferead^/^ 40.13,8c 14. Efay 55.8, and 9. Rom.t1.3fy 8c 35.R0. 1 2.3,8c 1 6 And of this I have largely before difcourfed, mor; brief!/ and Syllogiftically thus take it,as 1 recolleft it. If all Infants of Jcwcs are commanded in Scripture to be cir- cumcifed, and their Parents thereupon bound to bring them to C;rcumcifioi , Then alfo all Infants of Chriftians are com- manded to b: baptifcd,and their Parents bound to bring them to baptifm. Bat all Infants of Jcwes are commanded in Scripture to be circumcifcd, and their Parents bound to bring them to Cir- cumcifion/Thcrefore all Infants of chrinians are commanded to be baptifed, and their Parents bound to bring them to baptifm. The firft Propofition is clear from the cited Texts of Hebrews 13.9 and Colofliam 2. n. and from the Analogy of Circumcifi- on and baptifm, and the fameneffe or identity of the Covw- nant of both Adminiftrations, in the fubftantials , as to the good ofSouta The fecond Proportion, is the very Letter of the Text, in the feventecnth of Genejis^nd elfewherc as hath been flieived.-and fo 1 have reafoncd Infant-bapdfm into a command, before 1 intend- ed it. A fourth Warrant is this Reafon ; If Baptifm be a means and Remedy to free Ghriftian-Infants from original! fin } as to guilt and punifhm:nr, and the dominion thereof in th:m, that are E eft and Bs'ecvrs, Then fuch arc and ought tobcbapii* (Id. The Church or Minifterof it, knowing nothing of this and that particular Infant, biitbcor (he may be fuch. Tnis Warant is rcafon:d out of Gods Word, or this Reafon is War- ranted out of Gods Word, Rowans 6 3 4, 5>6. verfes. We as many of us, as were baptifed into Chrift>were baptifedinto his death ; ' therefore we are buried with him by baptijm into bis death , that like as Chrijl was raifed up from the dead-, fo we jhould walk, in nevenefie of life, &c. Knowing this* that our old man is cruofiid with him, that the body of fin might be dejiroyed}that henceforth we jhould not ferve fin. I muft here add a little explication, left there ru iy be a mi?- conftru&ion 40 Original Sin how taken dway conftruttion or fomc Popery ; The Popery in this poynt is this, That baprifm takah away original fin, that it ceafeth after bap- tifm to be a fin properly, and is nothing but a defeft or wcak- xstfc which makech the heart fit and ready to conceive fin, like Tinder which is not Fire, but is apt to conceive Fire : This I abandon, as Popery and an Error.B ut this I aver, as Truth and Protcftancy. i. That after baptifm > in the Elcil: Infants, original fin is taken away, as tG the punifhment of it,for there it no condemn** tion to them that are in ChriJtjRom.S,!. 2. As to the guiltineflc of the perfon, there being nothing to bind them to puni(hment» if no fuch condemnation. 3. As to the dominion of it, it (hall not reign in their mortal bodies, nor they ferve it. 4. As to the Imputation of it, it (hall not be imputed to them , but be pardoned , and in that refpeft , be as if not. But for all this , original fin or concupifcnccremaines in the Eleft Infants, even after baptifm, and ever after, and is Mill fin and properly fin, fomc limbs and portions, of the old man, and the body of fin remain, even where he is faid to be crucified and deftroyed, in the manner above, and there arc and will be defile- ments in them that are wafhed : I muft enlarge no farther here. However this may be a comfort to Belecvers , that in Chrifi the promifed feed (who mould and did break the Ser- pents head, which in fomc good fenfe, I may caU original fins) there is pardon of this fin, to their natural feed , and therefore Chrift was alfo born, not in the ordinary way, a? others of Mankind, but of a Virgin, as conceived by the Holy Ghoft, that fo being free himfclf from original & all {in^ He might pro- cure the pardon of the fame,and be a plea againft it. Yea, though Infants in prefent have no cftual fins, yet their baptifm ex- tends its vertue to the taking away a!fo of the guilt* pumflimcnr, dominion, and imputatiou of fins to come,fo the party baptifed ftand to the order & terms of Baptifm? which is to turn to God, bcleeve a&ually in Chrift, and continually renew repentance, as the place above mentioned imports , Romans 6.4. and thus bap» tifm favcth, 1 Peter 3. 2 1. (So doth baptifm f;a! the Pardon, as Original and a&ualfirt^ how taken a way bf Baptifm . 4* as of origina!,fo alfo of a&ual fin, ACts 22. 16. Ananias faid to Paul, Arife and be baptifed^nd wajh away tby fmsyCallingupon the name of the Lord. Oh but wc commit fins dayly after bap- tifm^ & that after juftificatior, 8c will the Lord continue to par- d >« fuch fins > yes if wc continue to repent of, and purge away fuch fias. S J I Jr 'k no' rheir fkfltf but tcftvw that the very nature wajudefilrd. whfeh ih-ry recei- ved by rajiial g ncration from their Par- nt», and which ;hey were like to traduce and coaveigh to thei. Childrcn,and to tefti- fic Baptifm doth it at a Meant ^ pkdge> and Instrument. 43 fi: whac need they had to have fuch original Corruption, and uncircumciiion oi the flc(h,to be done away by thccJcnfing and Regenerating Spirit of Chrift, fealcd in thdr outward Gircum- cii jn : And thac Circumcifion in the former, as Baptifm in the latter difpenfation , do both poynt at this one and the fame thing, the Clcnfing away oi'the pollution of the natural birth, by the Spirit oi Chrift , there is a clear Text , Colojfians 2. 11,12,13. W* now arc fallen into thofc days,whcrein there have been not only (hiken burafed many foundations and principles of th: D jftrincs of Chrift, cfpecially two of thofc fix in Hebrewes 6.2. Wnich ar^ Repentance from dead worker, (a chief of which is original fin, ) and the do&rine of Baptifm; and wherein a Spirit of PelagidHtfm hath entred into many, and goeth about preaching unto Parents a freedom from original fin, & pollution in their Infants, as derived itom Adam^ and fo proclaming a liberty from baptifing of them (juft as the impoftors foretold of by Saint Peter) whileft they promifc them liberty, they them- felvcs arc the Servants of Corruption, 2 Pet. 2.1 p. It concernetb us therefore fo much the more , who are Mafter«builder2 in the HjufeofGod, or but Repairers of the breaches, to uphold and maintain thefc two foundations of the Chriftians Faith , and to teach the people firft, that as thcmfclves were, fo their Children are defiled with original fin and pollution by their natural birth, and then next, that there is no other ordinary way of clenfing and wafhing them, but by the regenerating and purifying Spirfc and Grace of Chrift, Signified, Scaled, and Exhibited in and by the outward wafting of Water in Biptifm, aspleafeth God. Again, I fay not that Baptifm doth all this, from or by the deed done, or work wrought, which is their Popifti phrafe, but _(as our Proteftants fay^) either as it is a means to give 8c cxhibitc Chrift with his benefits, the which it doth by fignification, as a particular Certificate afiiii ing forgiveneflc of fins ; or as a to- ken or pledge of the Grace of God, confirming it. Or as an in« ftrument, becaufe in and with the right ufeof Biptifm, Gcd confers Gricc where and when he plealcth (for it is no Phyii- call but a Moral InftramenrJ an(* fct; n>8 image or mark of Re- generation upon the party, whence Biptifme is called the Lavr r Fff2 of 44 Exhortation to Parents io promote Baptifm ef their Infants, ot Rsgcnera ion : God is at liberty, and may, when and hoar he ♦plcafsch, let his Gca.ce acconpany his ordinance of Biptifm. Which way foevcr God doth work thefe great thing? , by or in Bipcifmj M-thinks, it is, a potent and invincible rcafon and warrant for the bringing Infants unto Baptifm 9 theonely cut- ward ministerial remedy in the Church, for the abating and a- bolHhingfhe malady of original fin, of which even Infantsitaad guilty, born, and conceived in it, unlefli you would involve Parents in another guilt, of ncglecYwg the meanes and cure of chat difcafc, which they were inftrumcntal to the bringing their Children into 5 or clfe that you arc of the opinion of the Ye- lagiati Htrcticks , who held no original fin at all in lnfantss .hut a&ual , which they alfo contracted by Imitation of other wick» ed 5 whereupon all the Antientand Orthodox Divines, urged and preflkd tbcm, with the Baptifm of Lnfants , and made it a foundation and proof,of original fin in Infants 5 like as I now go the other way, and urge and prcfle original fin in Infants , as a proof and plea, or warrant (as you call it) for the Baptifm of infants, as being the only outward ordinary way to begin their cure and Regeneration; more briefly and fy liogiftically thus take it as I rccolleft it. If Baptifm be commanded of God in the Gofpel for the warning away the guilt and filth of original and birth fin, then all Infan«,who are Partakers of thefc, are commanded Baptifm. But Baptifm is commanded of God in the Gofpel for the «ga(hing away the guilt and filth of original and birth-.fin. Therefore Infants who are Partakers of thefe, arc commanded Baptifm. The firft prcpofidon is not queftion«ble ; the light of Nature and Rsafon, commandcth the ufe of .meanes and medicines, to the end and for maladies : then" k need the Phyfician,&c.Comc unto rue all ye that arc weary and heavy laden, -&c. The fecond propofition , 5.? 'he matter of the Texts, Rom. 6. 3, and 4 and A&s 22. 16. a* hath been declared, and fol have reafoned baptifm of Infants into a command before I intend » ed it. Sir*,(I fpeak to you Parcnts)are you wil!ing,your little pretty babes fhould be faved I you fhouid be very willing and defirous of if i and the raihcr,in that you have been means of conveighing into Exhortation to fments to promote Bapiifm ofibtir Infants. 4* into thcrn, a corrupt feed, you (hould labour, they might be born again of the incorruptible feed , by the Word of God, and the Sealcs thereof, one whereof which is fit for them in their Infantile Eftate , is this Biptifm, lam (peaking of and for. Jf you would have them fived, it muft be cither whhout, or with Regeneration; without Regeneration they cannot be fa- yed.. For Fiejh and Blood cjtnmt inherit the Kingdom of God. That which is borngf the Flejh isFleJb, a degenerate finful corrupt thing, neither can corruption inherit incorruption : Therefore th y mutt be faved with Regeneration, for except a man be bom again of Water and the Spirit^ He cannot enter into the Kingdcttt ]0hn *.?.£. of God% That which is born of the Spirit is Spirit, a Regenerate fancYfied and clean thing. Iffo, then, Sir?, brine forth your Intants and Babes unto the Laver and means of Regeneration, prefent them to the Water of Baptifm, and wait and pray for the Spirit of God, that it would move upon the face of tho Waters, (as it did in the firft Generation) audio formafpiritual Light out of or in a natural darkneiX, That the Baptifmal Water may be effrftual f by and throng that Spirit of God) as Waters of Jordan were, to the warning th.* Leyrofic of original iin,and as the Waters of Bethefda , to the healing of other difcafes whatsoever, even' their aftaal fins alfo, when afterwards cota- mitted. Ic is true, that your Children dying without Baptifm may be faved, by the Covenant and Promife of God and his Grace, many are Co , all arc fo, that arc of the Number of Gods E- left. Yea, 1 confeffe the hope of falvation doth not lie (b much in the Seal, as in the Covenant and Promife to which the Seat is annex:d. Indeed the Lord having made a promfe to you be* Iccving Parents, concerning your Children born in original-fin* (That he will be your God and the God of your feed) in this caft you niuft beleevc this his Word and Promife : Bat where h« hath ord.ined a Seal for the confirmation of your Faith, you muft take heed how you ncglcft to apply it j you muft not (as more than too many do in thefe days)think it a fupcrfluous and idle figure,and fome alfo hold ita iuperilitious and Idol-fervicc. That which I may and do plead with you for, is this, that you Fff 3 would; 46 Exhortation to Parents to promote Baptifm of their Infants £ would fo account of it , as it is , that there is a neccflity lying upon you to baptifc your Children bom in original (in, I mean a neccflity not abfolutc but conditional : in cafe your Children be prevented of Baptifm by death , you may well hope of the falvation of them, by the Promifc and Covenant onely,as 1 faid, of God and his Grace : and if after Baptifm they be taken away from you by death, you may better hope of their falvation,from both, Covenant and Seal alfo : But if you be careleffe and negligent, and do alfo (it may bo) purpofely and prophancly o- , mit your duty , to put your Children in Covenant with your felfs, under the initial Seal thereof, you will very hardly an- fwer fuch your couxfe cither to God himfelf, or his Church,yca, or to your Children, and (I think at Iau\) to your own Confer- ences. But in the mean time what blindnefie and preemption is this in you, Parent?, to tempt God, and to caft your Children* oncly upon the hands of his Spirit, when he hath alio appoint- ed Water, for their Waflimg and Regenerating * this is as if you mould throw up your Cnildren unto the top of the Pinnacle of the Tcmple,when as you have a*Ladder Handing and reaching up thither to carry them up by or upon ; upon this glofie, God (hall give his Angels charge over them, Co his Spirit order over them,and in their hands ihallthcy bear them up,and on his finger ftiall he hold them, left at any time they periln, and come to dc* ftrucVion bodily or ghoftly. What Prcphancflc and impiety is this,in you Parents, to flight and rcfufc the outward ordinary means of your Childrcnj fpi- ritual and eternal good,as it may be the freeing of them from the Guilt , Dominion, and Condemnation of original pollution, &c.and to refer them over wholly toth- inward ordinary means, Chrift Jefusandhis Spirit, when as thefehave appointed and dedicated theformrr, tobeufed and applyed alfo > What carelc fncfT*, yt a cruelty is this in you Parents, to leave and let your Children lie in the pit, and under the bondage of original and natural pollution, into the which ycur felvcs have been acceffary to thtir falling, and not to fuffet a hand of Gods ordinance to be rea h:d <-r, there alfoare conjoyncd with Baptifm, Mortification of the FlcmjNsftncfs of Life,Faith and other Gra- ces mentioned; icseafily taken off, though one of your moft difficult Replies,as thus. 1. Thty are no more conjoyned with Baptifm than Circum- cifion : and therefore as their Infants were commanded to beeir* cumcifed 5 So our* are commanded to be baptifed, notwith- standing their tnhability and incapacity of doing fuch aft*, or having fuch Graces > which is equal and alike in both; 2. In fuch Con)un6tions4f the Textsfpcak of Actual Faith & A&ual indcavoi ing after Mortification, 8cc. And require thefc in pcrfons baptifed, they nu.ft be limited to (uch as were Adults, grown in years, converts from Hcathcnifm, fuch as Cornelius and the Eunuch; for therefore doth the Scripture name them, to (haw the fame, when it mentioneth their Baptifm, and the conjoyncd duties as required in fuch ; which is nothing againft Biptifm. P .3. Oiflnfantsfhould be meant, it fuffi;eth, that thcie have them 5 Mortification, &c. not in the Aft, cxercifing andmani* fcfting themfelvcs in any deedj or word profiling the fame, but oncly in Habit included and lying in the principle of Grace, the Holy Spirit : and why,bccaufc infants arc finners, not by any proper Aft of their own,butonely by an Hereditary Habit. Now who amongft you can or w=ll fay, that infanrshave not thus the Spirit of God, which bloweth where it lifreth, and hath lifted to blow in fomeof th;m we know of, and thoufands more, where idiftetb, that we know not of , effofting and producing in them this habitual principle of Grace. O; this fee more before. 4. Norfs it rcceffary that Baptifm, in that very moment it is received, mould cffcft all things it figurcth out and doth fig- nine: (no more was it, that Circumcifion Should do the like) but Infants ofChriftians capable of ends and of Bapt. baptifed, aq but it may fait to working them afterwards,wherein prefcnt there i« an impediment and hindrance, that lecteth a&ual tact, morti- fication, Repentance, Sec. as in infant?, the want of rcafon doth : Thofc A&iuls are nor. for the prefene required in infants to be baptifed, who yet are required to be in prefent actualy baprifed, for they are required to be partakers of the death and burial of Chrift, that is , the merit and power thereof, to the killing and burying of fan and natural corruption , of which Baptifm is the fign and means. More briefly and fyllogiftically thus take it, aslrecollcft it. If Baptifm do uicceed,and is fubftitutcd of Chrift now,inftcad of Circumcifion, in the Church of the Gentiles, then, as infants were commanded to be circumcifed then in the Church of the Jcwe?, Co arc Infants commanded to be bap- tized in the Church of the Gentiles. Bnt the Antecedent is true , being the very matter and fiib- ftance of the Text above. Therefore alfo the Confequent is fuch; and fo I havereafoncd Infant- Baptifm into another Command, before I intended this , as refcrved for the latter argument. But I fcrvc too large warrants upon you, Sir, to whom I now return , I have another or two brief ones, yet to fcrve. A fixe warrant therefore is this Reafon, If infants of Chriftian Parents be capable of all the good ends, effects and benefis, that Baptifm bringeth with it, and workcthor offereth them, then furcly they are both capable of Baptifm, and their Baptifm is warrantable and juftifieable. This warrant may be reafoned out of the Word, or this reafon warranted out of the Word, l Cor. 4. 1 5. 1 Cor. 9. 1 . The Apoftle warrants and reafons his Apoftlemip and the Gofpcl he preached, to be true and right, from the good ends, effects and benefits that came thereby to the Corinthians, and they received, that he had h gotten them through hisGcfpel) they were his work-in the Lord , and the Seal of his Apojtlefijip, were they in the Lord. So may I hence warrant and juftifie our miniftery, and tven the Baptifoi which we nnniftcr, to. the infants of Chriftian Parents, to be good and true, from the many good ends cffc£b and benefits the reof,of which Infants arc capable and receptive, and which are wrought and fcaled Ggg in 5 o Of the Endf, Effefts} and Benefits ofBdptiJm. in them thereby: Oar Mmiftery ofthcScalof Baptifin, wiih fuch eff.-tts ap.d fucceflc , may be alfo the Seal of our Mini- ftcry. Now the end?, effe&s, and benefits of Baptifm are thefe, for which it was appointed. i. To be a means of entrance and admiflion into the vifiblc Church, and a kind of engrafting the party baptifed into the body of Chrift , and an enrolling of him amongft the houfhold of God, as Members and Servants of Chrift , AUs 2-37- 2. To be, inftcad ofCircumcifion, an annexed Seal and aflu- ranc~, yea convciance of the good and grace of Chrifts word and promifc covenanted, the fum whereof is this , of being the Parents God, and God of their (ced, Row. 4.11. 3 To be a reprefentation and Collation of the walhing and clenling of the B'.ood and Spirit of Chrift,and of the Regenerati- on and New Birth, thus 3.51 Teter 3.21. 4. To be a Tyc or Obligation of the baptifed to ftri&cr O* , bedience of God and his Truth, to make the parties more dili- gent to fervc God, and careful to abandon fin, Rom.6.\. to the 9. iCor.1.13 5. To be a means of Union with Chrift, and of Unity a- mongft thcmfclves, knitting them fafter, a nd bringing them nearer unto Chrift, 1 Cor.n.i^.Epb.^. 6. To be a badge of Chriftianity , and for diftinftion of Chriftians from Unbelieving Jewcs and Gen tiles, astheftamp and Character whereby they arc known to belong to Chrift, being a kind of partition-wall betwixt Chriftians and Jewes and Heathens, Ephef.2.14. Now Sir, tell me, which of all thefe our infants are incapa** blcof, that you (hould thereupon deny them Biptifm ; in the meantime , Itellyqu, they are capable of them all, and there- fore arc not to be denyed. The promifes of the Covenant, the warning away of fin by Chrifts Blood and Spirit, the admittance into the body of Chrift, &c. may be fealcd unto them, as where- in they arc but Paftivc; and if you fay, fo ate they capable of the Graces, figncd in the Lords Supper, and therefore nv.y commu- nicate, 1 fay, how know you that 1 you have no rule for that, no glimpfc of light from the Word lorthit, whereas lhave given Infants not capable oft be Lords Supper. 5 c given you evidence enough of light for the other, ir you will fee there feiSwiiptuia! f{.rr, that infants arc capable of the Gracts fignrd and fcalcd in Baptifm,we may te fure of ir, and therefore mayadout them to Biptifm i there is but your fujrpo- fal light (which is below Traditional , you fo much write a- gainft) iha: th.y are capable of the Grace figned and feaLd in thLor Js Supper; are^ot: furc 01 ir,and will ycu thereupon ad- m)< them th-r: to ) The Lotds S ipper is no initial Seal,, and for Pv.ccp i m into ■Covenant which I onely plead for, for infants, yet this Seal which i* Biptiim it Lrves to confi m fall the benefits of the Covc« nanr, ar the bapc'ifed grow capable of them, and are made par- takers of then:, and fo is a pood preparative, un-o the Chriftians Pafleover, or the Lords Supp-r afterwards,- i-1 du; time and orders The Lords Supper is a Seal of Augmentation^ appointed for the nourishment and growth of thofc Graces which the Co- venant promif£.h,and requircth particularly and txprefly of all partakers of it, That they on u ft difcerh the Lords Body, and try and cximin thcrr.felves , and therefore Infants are not capa- ble of the Graces of the Lords Supper, like a? they are of them of Baptifm, for that they niuft be Active in that, whereas they may be but Paflive in this. Thofe that are capable of all the good cnd3,eff &s,& benefit?,of an Ordinance , they arc not to be forbidden to come , or Co be kept back from ir,as being a go ;d and valid Ordinance to fuch. But Infants and little Children arc capable of all the good ends, efffts, and benefits of t!.: Ordinance of Biptifm. Therefore Infants and liul Children are not to be forbidden tocome^ cr robe kept back from it, it being a good and valid B ptifm, ?nd beneficial to them. The firft proportion is clear , from the 1 Cor. 4 15. 1 Cor, 9.1. already cited, to which 1 add, Adattk. 1914 which clears ic as to this particular. The fecond propofi ion is not qucSionablc.that they arecapi- ble,as hiving reafonablc C ;uls,bdonging(it may be) to election; and fo having the Spirit , and Grace (as before) and the Letter of the Text Ihev. c. hit, For theirs is the K'v. gdom of Heaven, 8 ( moreover and above) arc you not willing , your Children mould have the privilege to be accounted as belonging to the family and houfliold of God upon earth r That they mould have an obli- gation upon them to bind them to the duties of the Covenant of God as they grow of capacity to perform them I that they have a good Tide afterwards to that other Seal of growth and ,nou- ri(hm:nt in fpiritual Graces ? Why then do you with-hold them fromBiptifm? arc you not defirous, they (hould, as members of the" viiible Church , have a place in the Communion of Siints^anda (hare in thofe prayers that are put up to the throne of Graze, foe the welfare 01 the Ghutch, and (particularly) for a bkffng upon the Ordinances thereof* and that they mould have a Seal to plead, not only in the prefentday of their initiati- on, but throughout all their life time, as to the Covenant, for all thofc good things whereof it is a Seal, fo to the Condition, for fulfilling the good duties* and f j gaining the anfwer of a good Go ifciencc,and in which Cafe it is faid, to favc f Why then bring them forth & prefent them unto Bipdfrn. B: not like unto the 0- firich in Job.^9 16. She is hardened again}} her young one^as though they were not hers \ Iter labour is in vains without fear., becaufe God hath deprived her ofWifdom^neitherhaxh he imparted, tober Vnder- ftandtng, whichteavethher eggs in the earth, and war mnh them in dujif and forgetteth that the foot may crujh tkem> and-tbatthe wddbeujl may breal^them:k needs no application, butthis$Bc not fo h ird h rarted to your Children * as to leave them in the earth and diilt of their natural Generation (fo every foot they may be cru(h.d,Sc yiur feid not ondy bruifed of the Serp:nt,bui: broken) bu: brinrf, then out to the water and (it may bej the lire of Bip- lifrnal Reiteration. The Apjftle pels you} (and yoj are ([ bc- Icve j very expert in that LcfTjn,and experienced in that matter) that if any provids not for his own,ind p rcialiy for thofc of his Ggg 3 own 5 4 Exhortation to Parents to brtng their Chddr.unto Baptifm* own houfe and kindred, he hath denyed the faith and is wor(e than an infidel: but if you provide not for your own Fi fh, and Children, and their Spirit? ; (not only giving them bodi- ly provifion , but not giving them alfo fuch provifions as God hath made ready for their Souls)you leave them as bad ?s infidels in a manner unbjpcifcd, denying them a means of faith, ar*d the Sea) of the Covenant. I fay no more, but what Man is there of you, whom if bis Son ask Bread, will be give him a Stone3 or tfke atl^ u Fiji willbe give him a Serpent) zsPfalw 147 f. Tbe young KaveHscrytq God for their josd to be £iven them, So your young infants (mc- thinks) cry to you , and in their crying and weeping, feem to call to you for their Water of Baptifm , as their miik of the Brefts , to be, the one, the relief onto their Souls againft original guilt and mifery,a« the other againft natural hunger and infirmity. Bjt if you regard not your Children, do you look to your felvw and your ends and benefit, and amongft the fc^ your Ho- nor firft> Is it not a great honour to you, to have a Child, counted to fomc great houfe, and of the Houfhold, and under the Protection of fome Njb!e-man? and is ic not a great deal more honour to have a Child , counted to the Houfe of G'd9 the CHurch, and of the Family, and under the fafegard of Je« fusChrift? why then, baptife your Child. If you ftand noc fo much upon your Honor, or theirs, yct> I am furc, you arc willing to have comfort of your Child, and good hope f here , is not fubftance and evidence enough for FaitfT) of its well be- ing, whileft it livcth fpirituatty, and after death, eternally > the way if, enter him into the Church of God by Biptifn. So you hope, your Child is preferred and made for ever ( a? you fpeak) when once you had gotten him into fome great Hou'c and no- ble Family , which are but Cottages to the Church, and igno- ble to the Family of God : Whereas if you with hold him from Baptifm, vou do leave him to have his visible a&uilftanding & abode in the Houfe of darkneiTSand continue h:m in an outward cafe and condition , as an alien from the Covenant, and a ftrangcr from the Common wealth of Chriftians, (what in you lyethj which muft needs be both difhonorablc and uncomfor- table to you the while. True indeed, you may have comfort from Exhortation to Parents to bring their C hildren to Baptifm. 5 5 f.'Otn the Covenant only, if by fome invincible, ana unavoida- ble aft of Providence intervening, your child be prevented and deprived of the Seal thereof which is Bjptifm, full againftyour will and purpofc ;< but if through your default and wilful! de- taining ofhim, and Contempt of this Ordinance, it fo fall our, that your Child dye unbiptizcd, He may be faved without the Seal of the Covenant, I believe ; but I dare notpromifc you herein Salvation, or Comforr,without Repentance of this your fault and fin againft God in his Ordinance. And fo this (hall be my Iaft reafon to you Parents , for the bringing of your Children to Baptifm, for that thereby you (hall not onely get honour to your (elves (as I faid ) bur. give ho- nour to God , by your fubmiflion unto the Seal alfo for them, to God, I fay, who took order for your Childnns honouring you, yea, honoured you both by entring into Covenant with both, and annexing the Seal of Baptifm thereto for your fur- ther Comfort and Confirmation. When our Saviour offered himfclf to be Baptized, John forbade him, faying, I have need to be baptifed of thee, and co»eft thou to me-? but Chrift took him off, faying, fuffer it t$ be fo now, for thus it becommeth us to fulfill all Rightecufaefs, Matth. 3. 1 3, 14, 15. as John the Baptift thought Chrift above the Ordinance of B3ptifro,by reafon of his great perfection ( and there be alfo other* as fay, thty are above ordinance?, in a high conccipt of thcmfclves :) So fome of you Anabaptifts think Infants of Chriflians, below the ordinance of Biptifm, by reafon of their great Impcrfe&ions ; Methinksour Saviour Chrift in this place anfwereth, and refutcth both them and you ; them by his example, who being the Highcft in per- fection, yet flopped down, and condefcended to the Ordinance of Biptifm, Therefore none fire, notthehigheft andperfe&cft amongft men in the Church upon earth, are above Ordinances; and you by his D j&rine, and Exhortation, fuffer it to be fo now for thus it becommeth you to fulfill all Righteoufnefs ; apart, andacl: whereof is, the Seal of the Righteoufn fs©f Faith, which Biptifm is r,ow under the Gofpel, as Circumcifion was under the Law; Kant. 4. 11. and therefore as the Jewifh Parents were diligent to rulfill that Righteoufnefs, by puttingthcirChildren in Covenant under that Seal of Righteoufnefs, Circumcifion,fo ought yc Chriftian Parents to be carefull to fulfill this Righte- onmefs, . 5 6 E apt, grounded upon Covenant al^ Tragical Righteoufnefs, oufnefs, and to put your Children in Covenant alfo under this Seal of rlighteoufnefs , B ptifm : Suffer it to be fo now , fuffcr little Children to come unto Chrift , and forbid them not , for they have need to come to him, and now in his abfencc, to his Ministers to be Baptized ; For thus it becommcth you as them, to fulfill all Rlghteoufnef?. Make not a Nullity of the Seal of Righteoufnefs, left you come at length to make Righteoufnefs it fclfa Nullity too. And now that 1 am fallen upon this matter of Righteoufnefs, I (hill turn to you again Sir , my Quserift, and ask ycu, if you do rat deny Baptifm to Infants,upon thisground,that you think, the efficacy of Ba ptifm is fcated and founded upon the practi- cal Righteoufncfs of aProfeffour, or Member of the Church, manifeftcd in words and deed?, Confcfiion and Converfation > which if you do, ( as indeed you do , and all that ftand out *t gainft Infant Baptifm :) it is a groundlcfs ground. For the Tcxb I juft now cited, (heweth that it is not fo grounded, but only up- on Covcnantal Righteoufnefs , and the free grace of God in Chrift j for fo Rom>$. H. He received thefigti of CircumcifwH, a Seal of the Righteoufnefs of Faith* which he had being jet uncir- cumcifed, that he might be the father of all them that believe^ &c. that Righteottfttefs might be imputedunto them alfo : where you fee it, or hear it in the very Terms, Righteoufnefs of Faith, not Life or Works, Imputed Righteoufnefs Cnot inherent orpraclrifed, which both Abraham had, and his Children muft have.) Now though our Chriftian Infants, have no inherent Rightcoufncfe, or practical manifefted unto us by their words or deeds ( as you require in thofe ycu/Baptizc ; and therefore put off) our Chrifti- an Infants untill years of difcrction to profefs true Faith, and years of action to practice good works)yct we prefent and dedi- cate them in their Infancy by Baptifm, to Gods mercy and fa- therly love inChrift, their and our Rightecufnitcils and Mouth, who froeU no fwcet Savour or Odour of Antiquity , as being one of the N w Stnt, orunfent rather, yet notwithstanding I (tall, and relate the Di- ftates of fomc of the. Ancient Apoftles fuccscding Paftors and Fathers of the Church of old ; and I will do it, for others fake, who are-Lovers or Antiquity, but I will do it in Englifh for your I fake ( whom lam Inftru&ing) who are no lover of Language.?, more than you can fpeak. I know, you will not take this General Cuftom and Practice orthe Church upon my bare word and prefent Aflertion, nor do I defire you fhould j Therefore Kemewbir the dajes oj old, con* fider 'Inf.- Eapt. approved by the Antient fathers S Auftm^ &c. 59 fide r the jears of many Generations ; a$l\thy Father and ht willfhew, tbcC) thy fLlder$% and they will telltbee; as\nove of the day a that arc paji, %rhichvcetebefore3 whether there haih keen any futh thing, as the BaptizUig.oi Infam* of Believer?. You ih-.ll leadily find the Tame, att or whifper into our eares, any "DoBrine to the Contrary 5 This Prattice of BaptizingGhildreny The Church alwayes had, this it hath, this it alwayes htldy this it hath received from the Faith or fidelity of our AncejiorS) and this it kgeps Conllantly to the end. Therefore doth the fame Father fo often and fo much prcfi this Argument, The Churches Practice of B^ptizing-Infants up* on felagius and his followers ( who were Contemporary with Augufiine) holding Infants were not taken, or tainted with ori- Hhh 2 ginai / »... I I ■- . . ' "I I II ■ ■ ■ I ' I I ■»!■■■■ I . 60 Inf. Bap. ap {.roved by the practice oj the nnwerjal Church, gtnal Corruption and Sin, by propagation, but only Contracted the fame by Imitation ; as in his 150 EpiftU unto Sixtus j in his fecond Book of Marriage and Concup. 18. Chap, in his firft B ok againft Crefcon. the Grammarian, a p. 30. in his fourth B,ok againft the Donar. c. 23. in his fixth book againft Juliany one oiPelagius his Schollars, or his opinions. Now if this had not been truly and undeniably. The Cu- ftom and Pcattice of the Church, even up to the firft and Primi- tive times, as Auguliine affirmed , Felagius and his Difciplcs would foon have fallen foul upon nim,as.thc Pharifecs did upon our Saviour,and have (ai69thou bearejl witnefs 0} thy felf, (8c for thy fclfj thy witnefs is not true, they would have given a check or dcnyal, to fiich a Cuftom, accufed it of Novelty, or but of Ye- ftcrday, and fo have turned off eafily that Argument (which of all other lay moft heavily upon them J the Ancient Churches Cuftom and Praft ice in Baptizing- Infant?. But they never did that, as who could not deny this. And fo that other exception againft Augn^ine^ as rf he fhould nttcr and urge this in Heat and PalTion againft Pelagius his Ad- verfary in point of Baptizing of Infants, and fpeak more of the Cuftom and Practice of the Church, than was true , falleth of it felf For they differed not in that point of Infant* Baptifm h no nor in the matter of the Cuftom of the Church herein. For fo Augujiine affirmcth both in his firft Book of the Merit and Rcmiffion of Sin. Ihe Pelagians themselves do grants that little Children are to be Baptized, as who cannot come in (orftandupj againjithe Authority of the Vniverfal Churchy delivered without doubt ( orTraditioned) by our Lord and his Apojiles. And again in the eleventh Book againft Ctleftius and Pelagius, He affirms and cites , that C as in- deed he could not make any dcnyal,or takcany exception thcxt- so, as who by his own eyes and experience, faw & found it to be moft true and uniform; and Co I may fay,ouriBaptifn>of Infant is a true Baptifm ; and the Ancient Churches Practice hereof) is a true Practice, even our enemies themfcJves being Judge?, as Veut. 32. 31. But why then was not, Augujlim hirafclf Baptized in hi* In- fancy ? who was fuch a ftroag Advocate for the Baptifm ofln- fants > the Reafon is plain, and makes nothing againit our Infant* Baptifm, or the General Pra&ice of ehe.Church \ for neither his Father nor Mother were Chriftians or Believers when hknfelf was born and they continued fo, untill a little before their dctrh $ Auguitine himCcli was not converted from his ManicJw *n Ux eiles and other vices untill the 31. year of his age, who two year* continuing a Catechumen, and in the: mean time writing fomechingijto give proof aridteitimewiy<©f the truth of his con- version, or of his converfion to the Truth, was Baptized himfelf, and his Son Adcodate together, like as Ahrahatnv/^% circumci- fedwith Ifmatl his Son, on the felffatnc day: Thcfe things may be feen, in His Confeffions. I mill need to.adde no more, for the mewing Infant- Baptifm, to have been the Cuftom and Practice of all the former Anciens Churches : Auguftines Tvftimony of the fame, is to me inftead of all, and as Goliahs Sword to David , there is none like that^ Give it me. 1 S \m. 2 1. 9. I have taken it, and I give it thee, not as a (ingle Teftitnony of one Father for it , but as a Quadruple witnefsofthe Univerfal Church, and its Cuftom and Practice for the point of Paedobaptifm, being four times exprefly deli- vered, though by one and the fame Father, Saint Aujlin : Yet I may, for more pcrfpicuity fake,follow up this General Ttftimo* Hhh 3 ny 6l Jnf.fi apK-tpyrotoedbp the- Apttent Fathers $rApfliny&c. ny by one1 rAiihcr unto m Particulars, 1 mean, the Co- alterati- ons oi other' particular Fathers in their ftvcral ages. For the year, You have heard what Augufine haih laid and written as 390. for that Century, and thofc years wherein he lived. 384.* Hkromy In his Epiitte ad Lat^m, having told her, that the good and the evill oi little or.c.'j are imputed much to their Pa- rents ; he attdetrrin the middle of thatEpiftle : .»»/*/} (perhaj-s) yon think^ the Sons ofChrifiians, if they receive not Bapufm,lhey onely are guilty of fin, and that tie wickfdnefs alfo thereof is not to be referred or to redound to the Parentst who would not give hytfpg- cially at'tfrin fuch a time, wherein they could nit comradidy who were tor eceivCit. -In his. Book againft the >Pelagiam cowards the end, -he'iftbr mfant- Baptifm, and confirms it by alleadging the Authority of Cyprian^ and hisCoHcagues : In the fame third Book againft Pelag: it is thus CritoQ. e.) Pelagian^ XaXth grant nit thus much) at lefty that they are without finywho cannot fin /peak- ing of Infant iQ To whom Attieus ( i. e.) Hiexonimus, Anfwerethy IwillGrant it, if they hjitoebeen Baptized in Chnijt \ and again, Ihej are withsujany Sin9 through the'&vaceiof Gody which they have received in Baptifm. 382. Cbryfojiom Arch Biftiop of Conjiantmopky in his Homil. to the Neophytes*, is for the Baptifm of Children 5 and in his 40. Homil; uptfn Genef. calls Baptifm o'uP'Gircumcificn, His being not Bapti- zed iinnll he was 4 [.'years of age^ doth not prejudice here-, as whofe Father and Mother were not Ghriftians, athis birth} and who himfelf was brought up under Libaniusy an enemy to, and a feoffor at Religion : but after he was inftru&ed in the Divini- ty knowledge by Miletus a Bifhop, and Baptizrd of him. In his Homil: adNeopb: having fpoken of the Honours and Benefits of Baptifm, he faith a little from the beginning, For this caufe we Baptize the little Infant /, that they may not be defiled with finy that to them may be added, SanHityy Righteoufnefsy A* doption^ Inheritance, Fraternity of Chrift, 1 hat they may be all his Members, and th& Habitation of the Spirit. .) In his 40. Homil: upon Genef having fpokcnof Circumci- fion appointed to the Children of the Jewes, and the pain of the Incifion, he addeth, but our Circuwcifion, or the grace of our Bap" t-ifm, brings the medicine without withjntfuch do!pur9 andlnnuwe* table benefits with it. It hath indeed no definite time fct down for Inf. Ba.pt. approved by the Antient Fathers S. Auflin^ &c. 63 for tt, as that hath; but h is lawful to receive bothr,i»-,triefii.ft, and in the middle, and in the la-ft age, this, not jnade'whh hands Circumciiion: in which there is fuftcined no great pain, but the Wright of fins arc put off,and Rcmiffion of them is found, even of all which are done throughout the whole life. Awhrofe, the Biftiop of MilUin, by whom Augufiine was Ccn-; 381. vei ted and B iptized $ in his-Book of Abraham the Pacriark, \hb. 2. Chap. 11. writing upon thrift word?, unlets aman be born a. gain of water and the Spirit : See (faith he ) Chriji excepts none, not the btca»t, not the prevented by fame nectffiy, &c. Evfry age is obnoxious to (in, therefore every age is fit lor the Sacra- ment. So alfo in his Epiftle ad Demelriadem Virginem, he; mention* eth the Baptifm of Children, Efcli. 8+. lib. xoifpeaking in that Epiftle againft Pride,artd Boaftingofiome especially Haeretiqucs! and (h:wing the evill effctts thereof, to the defend ingfalfeppi» nrans, extenuating of evil and fin,' and ihe;£vaeuafcing.©(fornc good, gives ihefc tw<£Iniiance$, . aroongft othera : 'Hence tf^e fm of Adam is affirmed to hurt hi? Poiterityy by jtxkwplt ', not by pajjagej ortranfition into them : Hence is thai Ewcttaliun ef thel>apiifm of little Children as if they (hwld be fed, to have Adoption given there, but not to be abfoivedfroni their guilt r.arciVagairfj 3 bough little one1: not Baptized, may orjhould he fayed, yet great is iheneg" ligence of thofe. that hind, which are brought out of the Gofpel, and fctlcd by Apoftoliquc Authori- ty, Traditions ; and then, in his Time, Baptifm was miniftrcd to Infants, and obferved. Gregory Na£ianzene , In his 40. Oration of Holy Baptifm, 375* largely fpeaketh of it ; the brief is, in the Qiicftion and Anfwer, What fay ye ofthofe who are of tender Age^and perceive neither dam- mage or Grace, .(halt we Baptize xhofe ? Tes furely, if any danger be\ it is better to be Sanftified without fenfe andfeeling% then to depart without the Seal, and Initiation: Circumcifion bearing in a manner the figure of Baptifm, was offered to them , who were void of Reafon, fee. callcth alfo Baptifm, t he Seal or Signet to fuch. as enter into the Race of Life. 272. £j/»/ the Great, Bifliop of Cafarea , 1 Tom, Exhortation to Baptifm ; wherein though the Baptifm of Infants is not named, yet I find thefe words. There is a proper and peculiar time for this and that, as for deep, for watching, for warring, the time for Baptifm, is the whole life of man; which he proves at large ; and again, without Baptifm there is no light to the Soul ; and then adds, the jew was compelled or forced to Circumcifion, bccaufeevc< ry foul which was not Circurncifed the eighth day, was to be cut offj & wilt thou defer the Circumcifion, not made with bands, which is performed by Baptifm, in the putting of the fhfli; When wilt thou be a Ckrijiian ? Aihmafws Qu. 91. Of the Sayings and Interpretation of 325* Scripture, We dtpor put the Infant thrice into the water, and thrice bring it tut, infignifi cation of the death and refurreQionof Chriji upon Inf. Bapt. approved by the Ancient Fathers S . Auflin% &c. 6$ upon the third day. I (haHalfoherc fet down an anfwcr of h s Queti. 2. to Antiochus9 bec<*ufc it confirmes what I have writ be- fore, of Infants having the Holy Spirit ; Howfhall we know, that the Infant was truly Baptize^, and received the Holy Ghoft in Holy Baptifm when it was a Child ? but the anfwer is long, and (hall not need, becaufe 1 would be (hort, The Ghjfan is enough to the purpoft, and (heweth both,that Athanafius held both Iafant- B3ptifm, and therein affiimed them to receive ths Holy Spiut ; the very queftion, nukes it unquestionable as to him. Again in his Trearife of the Sabbath and Circumcifion, Hec calls Circumcifton, a type of Baptifm. Cyprian, Bi(hop of Carthage^ and a Martyr. The higher wc 247. go, the clcerer the light (hires for the Baptifm of Infant! ; for now here, Cyprian, with 66 Colleagues, all Bidiops, do in a Councel at Carthage decree for it 5 and fo Ccrtifieth his Friend lidus, in an Epiftle to him, third Book of Epiftlcs, Ep. 8. Yea that whole Epiftle, written by Cyprian and his 66 Colleagues fit- ting in Council with him, The Title of it is, of Infants tobe B:pt>zcd: and the fubjccT: of the whole Epiftlc is to juftifie the Baptizing of them, and anfwereth the objections of Ftdus. As to the Caufet ( the Baptifm of Infants j we all have judged that the mercy and Grace of God is not to be deny ed to any Child horn of man, &c. and that there is the fame equallity of grace for the young Infant^ as the JLlder. God is no refpecfer of perpmages nor ages, Yea he gives divers rcafons, why Infants, and the rather and the fooncr, becaufe Infants (hould be Baptized , which for brevity fake, I leave out here, as who am onely upon the (h:wing Cha- vlng proved the Baptifm of Infants before) the Cuftom and Pra&icc of Antiquity herein. This Epiftle al fo, is owned and avouched both by Hkrome Aui Angupne, to be the true Epiftle of Cyprian : by Hierom as above is faid ; and by Augujiine Epiftle 28.unto Hierom faying, Cypri* an did not here devife a Njw decree, but kept andobferved the true Faith, or the faithful Practice and Cuftom of the Church. Yea this Epiftle of Cyprian was a very ftrong ground for them both to ftand upon , and they very much rclycd upon it for (the ftrcngthening thcmfelvcs in their own opinion of Infant-Baptifm. Origeny the' Schollar and Difciplc of Clemens Alexandrinus, fo 204. forward a Schollar, that at eighteen years of his age, be fet up a Hi School 6 6 Inf. Bapt. approved by the Antknt fathers^ %. Jttftm^ &c. School and taught others ; in his fiJc Book to the Rom. 6. c, the Church hath received the Tradition from the Apojtles, even, or alio to little Childrenyto give Baptifm^ becaufeinthemy as in all, are the Genuine ; (or ingeneratcd)/?/ffo offinjhc which ought to be wa- Jhedwitb warer and the Spirit. Somewhat more of this, there is in his eighth Book upon Le- vit. 8. Homil. and upon Luke Homil. 14. 195* Tertullian whom Cyprian read fo diligently and efteemed Co highly, that in all matters of doubt, he would have recourfe to himf faying, 6ive me my Mafier9 meaning Tertullian, in his Book of Baptifm, chap. 18. According to the Condition, difpofiti- on 1 and alfo age of every perfon, the delaying of Baptifmis more profitable, efpccially in and about Infants : for what ncccf- celfity is there, (if it be not fo neceflary, ) to bring the (uerties into danger, of not performing their promife , and whether this be meant of the Children, which were not born of Ch riftian Pa- rents, as fomc will 5 or of" the Children of believing Parent?, at others fay, its evident, that Baptifm was admimftrcd in all ages, and he intimates the Cuftom, and practice of the Church in his age to Baptize them, even Children as well as others ; Though he feemt not to be fo well pleafed with it ; and yet again, the words import no other, then, that he denyed the Neccflity cne» ly of Baptifm, to them, being out of danger of death,not (imply the Baptizing of them rather ( as in another place) he doth im- ply, they ought to be Baptized, if there be danger or fear, that afterwards they may not or cannot be Baptized, in hh Book of the Soul, Chap. 3 9. and 40. where he faith, that Infants »f be~ lieving Far ems or one Parent , havefuch a SanUity , and that from the Privilege of their Birth (not the difciplinc of their bringing Up) as gives them a Right to Baptifm ; Therefore Tertullian called the Children of Believer s9 The defignees, or dejiinates efHolinefs^ or as clfewhcre , the Candidates of Holinefs ; and fo here is ^n evi- dence for that Birtb.Holinefs, or fader al Holinefs , of which I (hall ijpeak anon out of the 2 of AUs. j-Q hendus 2 Book, Chap. 39. Hecatnetofaveall lyhimfelfy 1 fay ally who are born again by hbny into Gody Infants and little ones dnd Children, andyong men and old mm, &c. The intention of the words is of Chrift Jefus, who (as it followcth there, v cnt through every age , to Infants made an Infant, San&i»>jrtR In* funs, inf. Bapt. approved by the Antient Fa tbers S . Aufim^ &c. 6j fants>to little ones made a little one fancYifying thoie o chat age; but you fee there is an expredion of Infants, of whom he faith, they arc born again into or unto God, that is3 Baptized ; for fo B^pdfin is ufually ftiltd by the Ancients, cfpecially the Greeks, a ReK.ifcertce or New Binh^or Palingenjy^t, might be (h wed out ofAthanafius and Bafils who took itjfrom the ApoftoJiqu: man* ner alfo of fpeaking, "lit. 3.5* as before I mentioned. I can go no higher ; fo/ Iren£us was the Schollar and Difciplc c&P oiycarpus ; and Polycarpus was the Schollar or Difciplc of John the Evmgciifts j and fo you fee, I am come up to the very tkiits and thrdholds of the Apoftoliquc Churches , and Primi- tive Times, with the Oftom and Practice of Baptizing Infants. Some go y:t higher, to Juftin Martyr qutft & refp adorthod. qu. j-q- 56. 3tid 16 to Clemens the Roman B'ftiop in his Apojiolical cenjiit gQ lib. 6. cap. 1 5. and to Vyonifm Areopagita in his Ecclef. Hie- £0 rarcby. Ch. laft. And indeed there arc pregnant places in them for Baptizing Infants, if the Authors , were Legitimate : they arc fo good and fufficicnt againft the P.pifts, who own them and maintain them for true and Genuine ; but with us they are held to be fuppofitions and fpurious , and though ma- ny good and true things are in them, as Infant- Bapt i fin, &c. Yet they arc not belonging to fuch venerable Names as thofelhavc rchearfed. and therefore not of that Antiquity with thcm,and fo impertinent to my purpofc. Onely onethinglmuftad, to fatisfie the Reader, why, on this fide ofAuguftine towards the Apoftles, I have mentioned no more of the Fathers, andDo&ors of the Church, feeing there were many more, or what ! were they difcrcpant in their opini* on about the Baptifm of Infants?no furejthc reafon muft needs be this, they all lived long before Pelagius came out from the Brit- ain Seas, and gathered to himfclf a Sea of Locufts which fpread over the world, and troubled the Churches with this matter for one they denying the Traduction of originall fin in Infants. Therefore thofe Ancient Fathers of the Church, having no oc- cafion to intermeddle with any fuch matters about Infant* Bap* tifm,kcpt clofc onely to fuch controverfics and qucftions as were on foot in their dayes ( favc onely that Cyprian , as I touched before, was questioned hereabouts : ) the filencc of thofc Fa- thers, that touched not ,f. approved by the Modern and Reformed churches, 6y Seeing then you care not for looking behind you to Antiqui- ty, look before you, and fee the Reformed Churches, in France, Vutckland) Scotland ( why not England ? if Infant Baptifm be not now in prefent the practice and Cuftom ( and fo hath been or" old, ofthefc and other Reformed Churches, what then is your Church f ifyou have any) but a deformed one, but a New upft'.rt one, who oppofc this fo General Cuftom both Ancient and Modern, and hav: quite caft it out of your doors, introdu- cing, inftead thereof, and fctting up, the Man-Biptifm, and In- fant' Rebaptifm, crying out daily for thefe your Great ( little Nothings "Diana's of thcEphefiant firft love and firft Baptifm for- fakingAnabaprifts. Lttmeadvifeyou to lay your hand upon your mouth, and ceafe declaiming and clamouring againft this Infant- Bipufm, (for therein you reproach God and his Church, God for ap- pointing, Iifant-Circumcinon, and his Church, forufingln- fanc-Baptifm : ) yea to lay your hand upon your hcirt, and in love to the Truth, to return unto your Firft Love, and Truth, to enter again into Communion, and fellowfhip with your Mo- ther-Church ofEngUnd, and thofe other her Sifter- Churches of the Proteftants, giving unto us the Right of FellouftYp, who are ready to reach forth the lame to you > and alfo to embrace you. And ifthisbcany Block you (tun b!e at in the way to our Churches, that there arc Rents nnd Divilionsftill amonp,ft us, ( whom may we thank for them ? even about this Infant- Bip- tifm }ll anfvver you in a word,that our differences are not about Bapt:zinglrrmts, bu: about Infants ro be Baptized , and fo, in tb; Point o; Pae J obaptifmj or Infant* Bjprifm, we are all agreed, and a£ri;ved only at your Schifm and D viiicn, which you have made in. our Churches, which are ail againft you, there* fore our car^ muft be, if we cannot hold fellowuYtp with you, to keep our Communion notwirftanding with all- Chriftian Churches; and if you will feparate and depart, from us and then, wemuft let you depart, a Brother, oca Sifter is not under ige in ,1'ich Cafes, BJt God hath c lied us to peace, peace, a3 Gbrifts Legacy left to his Church, we are willing to have with ail -men , Co we may withail retain Truth. And feeing whii'ft w: (peak of p:ace,you are ftill for diflT.ntion, whil'lt we I i i 3 propound. JO Exhortation 10 Communion wit Jo the Church. propound truth, you will fhilhoJd error?, our care mure be, (and (hill be, I hope, in our particulars ) to maintain and pre- (crve our peace and Truth, and our Communion in both, with- all the Reformed Churches abroad, in th«is point of Infant Bap- tifm, which Churches, (as ours at home ) God hath blcffrd in this way, with great increafe of heavenly gifts, and infinite numbers of renocned profeffburs, and Saints of thofc that have bin baptized in their Infancy. Andibat knowing the time that now itis high time for you to awak^ out offleepiRo.1%.1 i.Sc to rcpenr of thofe finful Scifmcs, and Rent?, and Separations you have made between your felves and us, and other true Churches* to give over your charging us, and them with iniquity , wherein wc fh:w piety, and your putting a divine rcftiaint upon Infant. Bap- tifm, wherein God hath given them, and us liberty, and in ex« eluding Christian poor Infants, thofe privileges , and helps to heaven which Chrift hath indulged them. And thus I have anfwered your laft Quere, mewing unto you, what warrants we have out of the word, for our Baptizing of Infants, namely the fix warrants rcafoned out of the word, which are fix Reafons, warranted out of the word. Now joyn all thefe reafons together, with the Scripture out of which they are deduced, and will they not make that Analogy, or pro« portion of Faith, as to this point of Infant Baptifm, according to which wc arc to proceed ; nay, may they not all arifetoa Tantamount Command, or a virtual or implicitc Command, or a confequential Command of the (ame,yea 1 have made two or three of them to be fuch in their particulars, I hive been (b ufed to give you Commands out of the word, for our former praftices, being called ever upon by you, for fuch Commands, which fo ring (till in my ears, that, though, the word, warrant, do not put me upon fuch a hot fervice as a Command : (which I believe notwithstanding you meant, your Tongue either out- running, or (hort .running your wit, J I (hall interpret your challenge, or Quaere to aim at, what Command out of the word have you for Baptizing Infants r" And firft, what Command have you out of the word, againft Baptizing Infants of Bapti- zed Parents, if none, Then you deny Baptifm to thofe, to whom Chrift denyed it not, and fo, in a manner you deny Chrift, to be your Matter* and if you deny him, you deny alfo him that fentf Special Co mmands and Precepts for Bapti/ed Infants* 7 \ fcnt him j if none, then you have no authority to in/ring or Counter- command the liberty of the Church herein; ye take too much upon you Sons of Munccr. Secondly, What Command would you have out of the word for our Baptifing Infants of Baptifed Parents f do you mean an cxprefTi and particular Command? in calling for this, you grant an cxplicite Command for it and a general one; 1 am glad of this, and will make much of it, as to my purpofes : for as general propofitions arc enough to infer their particular , all Children of the Church and in Covenant, are to be baptifed, and therefore the Infants of Baptifed Parents are to be baptifed : So implicite Commands, which are but folded up and wrapped in good rcafons or good confequences , arc fufficicnt for all tru: Sub j efts and Difciplesof Chrift, to do a work, and this, of Baptifing the Infants of baptifed Parents, as if it had been more cxprefled ; The words intimation } era deduftion from the Word, is to me and Ought to be to you, the Words, Exprem*' on> and an injua&ion from the Word. For if you be fo ftrcit girdled, and qucaiie-ftomacht, or narrow throated, that nothing will down with you, or can be digefted, but oncly cxpreflk Commands, in fo many Words, Letters, and Syllables, as Infant-bapcifm doth confift of, Then I pray , produce fuch an express Command ou: of the Word, for Children of Be* Icevers, whrn cheyare grown, to be inftrufted and baptifed upon the Confefllon of Faith, or for Baptifmof Believers onely, in Chriftian Churches (to ufc your own wcrdsj r or for Woc- mens eating the PafT:ovcr,and receiving the Lords Supper,or,for the firft day of the week to be the Chriftian Sabbath, or for di» vert other fuch things that I name not*. And yet 1 have fomething more to (hew ou,than Rational and Confcquential Command for Infant- Baptifm, There is ah fo an Analogical (I had almoft added, Typical) Command for the fame, our Infant" Baptifm. For Go^s Command to Abrai bam and the Jewcs to circumcife their Infants fthe Seal then in force, and for tha'«time of the Law) The fame Command bind* us Chriftians, to bap tile our Infants, (the Seal now in force, and for this time of the Gofpcl) binds us I fay by the juft Analo* gy and Proportion, that is between the two Sacraments and Seals of one and the fame Covenant, efpecially^thc one, Bat tifm > fuc- J2 An Analogical command for Inf. Bap. from Inf. Circum. fuccccding the other, Circumcifion. Suppofea Jf/«if, (who is oi late in many poynts Anabaptifcd, like as you Anabaptifis arc in as many Jefuited) fhould oppofe you> and deny your Baptifm of Beletvers onely , to be a Seal fas indeed he doth fo, denies both your and our Biptifmcs and the Lords Supper , to be Seals orSigncsJ will you not look back to Circumcifion in the Old Tcftament, where it is called a Seal and Sign f for in the New Tcftament they are no where called , either) and tknecfetch an Analogical proof , that ours are alfo Seals , cur Bptifmand^ their Circumcifion agreeing in the General Nature of a Sacra- ment. By the like Analogy , being queftioncd by you for a Command of Infant Baptifm in the New Tenement, if there be none there, I may go over to the Command of Infant- Circum- cifion in the Old Teftamcnt,and thence prove ours, alfo our In- fant-Baptifm to be commanded, and us therein bound and ob- liged to put the Initial Seal of thcN-w Tcftament upon our Children. Once more,Do you think that Gods Command to Abraham, and the Jewes to train up their Children in manner of wo&Qiip which was then in force: doth alfo command aid biisd us Chriftians to train up our Children in conformity to fuch Or- dinances as arc now in force; I bclecvc y&u think foj and therefore I think you will belecvc at laO, that Gods Command to Abraham and the Jewes to Circumcife their Children, and to give them the Seal of Circumcifion, then in force, is alio a Command upon us Chriftians , binding us to baptize our Infants, and to miniftcr unto them , the Seal of Baptifm now in force. And fo now this is the ufc I told you before I was like to make ©fyouranfwering, That the Jewifh Children werccircumcifed, onely by vertuc of a particular Commandentof God for the fame, 1 fay this ufc I may, and fhall make of ir, that by Vermc or Vice of fuch you anfwer, I infer alfo there from, yea there- in, a particujar Command for baptifing Chriftians Children, there being fuch an Analogy and proportion between the two Sacraments of one and the fame Covenant, in the Eflcntiah, of it, and the Rationals of it unto the eternal good of Souls. This might be good enough againftyou, becaufc it anfwers you in your kind, and meets with you in your own way, howfocver my A Command for Infant -Baptifm , in Matthew 28. 7? myfclf ftillhold, that the Jtwilh Infants were circunrifed, Circumcifion being the Seal thereof, and fo both inforced by a Comrnandenicnt or Word of Inftitution, as I haveiaid before. Bjt remember this alfo, thar Gods Commandement being out for Circumcifing Infants > whofc Parents were under the Seal, and no farther, by the fame reafons you blame our pra&icc of baptifing Infants, you blame God for fuch a Command, which you plead for the Circumcifing Infants ; becaufe Infants of Jewca were at mnch under ftatc of Nature, as Infants of Chrt. ftians are, and Infants ot Chriftians are as much under the ftatc of Grace, as the Infants of Jewes. If God were wife and good in commanding circumcifing of Infants, then we cannot be e- vil and foolim in praftiiing Baptifm of Infants commanded alfo here. But becaufe you New-light men , regard not much the Old Teftamcnt, for that it holds forth the Old-light of the com- mand for circumcifing of Infants, by the which walking, there may be proportioned out, or Analogifed a command for B ipti- fing ot Infants 5 I will fct upon a Text or two of the N;W Tefta- ment; and that famous one firft , wherein you much delighted of old, and from whence you would feem to have your New light j it is Matthew 28, if, and 20. Mcthinks I hear you faying already with Nathaniel, Can there come any good ihing out eft Nazareth > John 1. 4648c 7. Chap, any command out of thefe words, for Infant Baptifms, Come and fee, and hear, and whilcft I am as ?bilip> bringing forth (bmc good thing hence for poor Infanrs, be you at Natk ante 1 1 An Israelite indeed , in whom there is no guile9 and not an IJhmaelite indeed, in whom there ii nought but mocking at young Ifaacty devotion^ and young Children!* Baptifms , Gen.21.9. 1. 1 may fafcly fay, here in this command of CHrift , is no« thing meant or minded by him, about your taking Children of B.'lcevcrs already baptifed in our Church , where the GofptI is planted , and your rebaptifing them again after your teaching them and their profeffing; For the Baptifm here commanded and to be executed, was onely of Nations > where theGofpel was not yet planted, to be taught and baptifed once* 2. I may as fafely fay, That the ftate of thofc Pagan Gentilr e, being not the fame in poynt of Religion, as is the flare of us Kkk Chrifthn A Command for InfanUBaptifm9 in Matthew v8. Chriftian Gentiles, (as is faid abovej how can their, as yet, urn taught and ungofpelifed, their uncovenanted & unbaptifed con- dition, and be a rale and precedent to a Taught j Gofpclifcd , Covenanted baptifed Nition already 1 So Chrifts command here,doth not infringe or countcrcommand our Infant'Baptifmj yes you may fay,for doth not Chrift command all Nations to be taught before they be baptifed ? He doth fo, all pagan Nations, who were without Cbriji , being aliens from the Common-wealth of NttLtX^and grangers from the Covenant of pomife^.2. 12. Without God in the worldjbeing carried away to dumb Idoliti Cor. 12. What is this to us ? but yet, 3. I muft tell you; That this Commandement of Chrift, placing teaching betore baptifing, doth not pronounce Chriftian infants, unbaptifeable, becaufc untcachablc: if there be any ftich force of Argument from the order and placing of words, I pray argue fo out of Mar\ 1. 1> Where Repentance h placed before faith ; and out of John 3 .5. Where the Water is fet before the Spirit : Saint Peter will tell y ou, that the Spirit goeth before the Water, A8s 10.47. and you can tell your fclf, that Repen- tance folio wcth after Faith, as the fruit thereof; again it is not to be read here, firft teach , then baptife. Chrift doth not (hew here, which ought to go firft, and which laft, but leaves both to be done according to the condition of the Church 5 for ifit be a Church planted, and Chriftian , as ours is, then they are to be baptifed, and after inftrufted : if a Church to be phnu ed & Heathcnifti, then they arc to be firft taught, & then baptifed. Now the condition of the Church of God , which the family of Chrift chiefly was in thcApoftles times, at the beginning of their preaching the Gofpcl to and throughout the world, was much after the manner, of the Family of Abraham fwhich was then thconely Church reprcfentative:) As therefore Abraham in his family, had both adult, and Infants , himfclf being circum- cifed at 100. years old , Ifhmael at 1 4. years, the Profelytcs at other fcveral ages , Ifaac at 8. dayes, and fo taught Ifhmael and the Profelytcs of his houfe of this covenant and the Sacrament thereof, before he circumcifed them, but forthwith baptifed Ifaac before & without any foregoing inftru&ion : juft fo doth our Savio:ir Chrift appoint to be done in his family theChurch, which was now to be raifed in the greater part, and gathered 1 out A Command for Infant- Baptifm, in M atthe w 28. 75 out of the Nations; So as the adult Heathens, aliens from the Covenant, void of knowledge, were firft to be taught before they were baptifed, but the Children of fuch taught and baptifed Heathens, were forthwith to be initiated by the Sacrament of Baptifm, before they were taught in the heads of Religion Now the condition of our Churches, is a conftituted and planted Church, already formed, and therefore according to the in- tention of this Text, the baptifing of Infants is to prcccde,and the teaching them to follow, when by rcafon of years and ca- pacity, they can hear the word. 4. Chrift indeed gave Command, that whom his DifcipJcs had taught, they mould be baptifed 5 but that none mould be baptifed but fuch as were firft taught, that is your Addition or Tradition, wherein you referable the old Separates of the Jewes, the Pharifecs (as I have told you , the name of aPharifee, is in Englifh a Separate) For as they tranfgreiTed thcCommandements of God, by their Traditions of the Elders, Matthew 1*. So do you corrupt this Commandement of Chrift, by your Additions, and the inventions of your Youngfters. But in vain did they worfhip God ; Teaching fordottrines, the Commandemcnts of men ; and in vain do you worry us, bringing in for proofed the gloffesand expositions of Children. But look again upon the Text in Matthew* and fee, if Teaching do not alfo follow clofe after Baptifing, and Baptifing Co gocth before Teaching 5 thus with your own Argument retorted , I have flain you, as Goliah with his own Sword. Bat, fure, our Saviour Chrift, being the God of Order, and the Wifdom ot God, did not thus place the words, and order them up and down, to no purpofs. Yea, I conceive, that in fo doing, hepu-pofed to give a full and univcrfal Precept or Command for Baptifm , both to the Apoftlcs and others5 the Paftors of the Church, unto the worlds end, that fo, when thtyecafed, committing their converted Churches unto thefe, fucceeding them, thefc might proceed, where they left to bui'd, upon their foundations, To Baptife and Teach, where they had taught and Baptifed : And thus the words are v rv ord:riy placed and ranked, the firft file fa; I may fofp:ak) b.ing, of Teaching and Biptifing where the A.'oltks Went, as Am di- doursin Extraordinary, Teaching the Grown MenanU Women K k k % of 76 A Command for Infant-BdptijM , in Matthew 28. of the Nations and Pagans, the Gratuit al Covenant of God, and baptiting them, or giving them,the initial Seal thereof. The ncx: fi'e, or order, is, of Baptifing and Teaching, where went, either they alfo, as Paftors in Ordinary > or other Or- dinary PaftoiS, B ptifing the Children and Infants of fuch con" verted Nations and Pagans , being in Covenant with their Pa- rents, and teaching them afterwards to obferve, whatfoever Chrift commanded, &c. So that here Teenies to be Chrifts Com nandcment in this Text, both for Adult«Baptifm, and alfo Infant Baptifm, or ("if you will} for Parental-Baptifn^up- on their being taught the Covenant and thek embracing and profeffing Chrif>,and alfo for Filial Baptifm>upon their being in Covenant, as being Children of baptifed ProfefTors , after which is to follow teaching and inftru&ing of themt as they are able ; which is punctually obferved by us, who do, or (hould, having baptifed them (by order) Catechife them afterwards that fo they may be fitted in due time for that other Sacrament, the Lords Supper* according to that of Hebrews 6 2. Where the Apoftle fpcaks of Baptifms f The Baptifms I mentioned which arc plural or Two , in refpett of the fubjeft* capable, the grown men of the Nations converted , and their Infanta or Children, but yet but one and the fame Baptifm, as formerly I have fhewcdj Baptifms I fay, and impofition of hands, and alludcth to the practice then and tincc in ufe with the Church, That fuch Children as were baptifed in their Infancy , mould afterwards openly in their own perfons and with their own mouth, own the Covenant, confirm and ratifie the promifc and condition, make Profeflion of their Faith, and fo be, by impo* fition of Hands , farther confirmed and admitted to the Lords Supper. Now you, Sir, quite contrary to the order of thefe principles of the doctrine of Chrift, as they are called in the 1 . verfc ofHeb. d.Ycub.gin at impofition or laying on of Hands,beforc Baptifm, or the laying on of Water, and fb do but impofe upon us, as the Children , ( impoftor-'ike ) requiring tuft Confeffion of Faith from them, before they have from you Adminiftration of Baptifm, as if your Children born Chiiftians, had no more privilege, were in no better condition, than the Pagans and Nations, Chi i ft fait his Apoliles unto. 5- 1 Difciplewhot evenCkildren. yy 5. I (hall tell you, that the ward traiflated, Teach, all Na- tions, (in which lycth all the force of your arguing againft Childrcns Baptifm) it fignifi-th (fee your wantotsk (1 in, and yoar folly in declaring and clamoring againft U.Jvcrfity and human learning in the divine Languages, for fo arc the original ones ) fignifieth in the original , not onely to TYach, but to make Difciples of the Nations, to admit them to be Scholars, tobetaughr, This is the end wherefore the ApoftLs wercfent ou8, nani:ly to make Difciples, and the AcYions, whereby they were to attain this end, were Baptifing and Teaching, and if it were not thus, there would be found a Tautology in Chrifts words , and you muft read thera thus , Go teach all Nati- ons, baptifing them, Teaching them. Such an Expofition as this would put you to your (hifts, Go ye, make Difciples to me out of all Nations bv Baptifing and Teaching 5 and fuch a ons, may do well enoug 1 , very well againft: you, who when you come to this or any Texc,do but fliift up and down for your felf , but fift not at all for the fenfe. And therefore (to puzzle you a little , for there is no farther hopes of any of you I fear,) 1 will tell fonr: what more that out Divines have added to jufti- fic this Expoficion *, Cirift faith not, go make Difciples and baptifc them, bat make difciples baptifing them, implying, that by bapr.ifmg them they made thcmDifciplcsjLike as it is faid,thac John did baptife in the WildcrneiTc and preach, as though he did baptifc firft, and then preach : So all Ifrael is faid to be bap* tifed into Mofest not as already taught,but to be taught by him, for tke future, I Cor. 10.2. But I will not ftand upon this Difcipling the Nations, by baptifing them and their Children. Though the word (difciplc them) be a genrral word, comprehending in it both kinds of converfion,both by the preaching of the word, and the initiation of baptifm. This is that though , which i can prefle hence, That all Difciples of Chrift arc to be baptifed , there is a Command for this , Go, Difciplc the Nations and baptife them. And that this difcipling the Nations, was a making them Scholars and Difciples of Chrift,not as taught, but to b: taught of him as before, the force and energy of the word in the ori- ginal imporceth as much, as may farther be declared in Mat- K k k 3 thtw 78 bifcifits vehot even chilctrn. thewij 57. Where Joseph of Ari,),u\kea. , dilciplcd himfclf (chc fame word it there that here is) enrrcd himf If to be of Chrifts fchool : and one ol John o. 27 Where the blind man faith to ih Plarifer , WAlyt be aljo bis Vifciphi^nA be initiated to Larn of him > anjci n*y be farther inftanced from rhe manner of the JiWts, s n' i6.For thiscaufe I obtained mercy, that in mc, firft Jcfas Chrift might fliew forth all long.fufF-rinf, for a pattern to them who mould hereafter believe on him to life evcrlafting : fo thefc Nations obtained mercy, that in them firft, Jefus Chrift mighr mew forth Baptifm, for a pattern to them who mould hereafter be difcipled and taught of him in the evcrlafting Covenant ; namely, that Bap* ifm belongcth to them, all other Nations, fo far forth as they confift ot difci- plcd Parent? and Children, Parents proft fling Chrift in their own pcrfons, and their Children under their Chriftian Educa- tion , both together njake up a difciplcd Nation, commanded here to be baptized, as the proper and adequate Subject of Bap* tifmr Bo chr/Jlian Infants may he taught a i vpcII as the Jem. tifm. So that it Icanfh^w that the Children arc contained in the word Nmons, the work is done , a commandement here is for their baptizing. 1 (hall do it brkfly , yea it ii done to my hand already. i. Ic is a general rule in Scripture, That children are alwaies included in every a d inniftration>whcthcr of promifes or threat* nings, mercies or judgements, pdvil ges or burdens , unlcfs thy be ex eptjd j and in the very conftitution of it, children make a great part of a Nation. 2. In thi.« p4rtieu-.ar, of ih<-fe, all Nations here, fome think it to be fpokeii emphatically , in opposition t« the one Nation of the jews (*nd lb it i« in a feufe , this was the onely taught anddifcipledNiti »nj buc now, go and ceach and difdplcall Nations?) I mould rather, or a v. I, chink ic to befpoken in appoficion and rcU'iot uato rhc one Nation of the J'WS, that like as thc.Na i' no' the Jews ha h ben * long nm difci- pled and taught in the Co enant, md circumcifed, the parents with their children : (o now all Nnrons are commanded to be likewife difcipled and taught i: the fame Covenant, and bapii- Z.d, the parents wirhth ir children, the which S.P*«/ftiew- eth clearly, Gal. 3. 8. & 9. namely , that the Dc&rlnc of the G >fpel dtlivcred to Abraham in rhc nature of a Covenant, was pr ached now to all Nations, and fo the blcfling of Abraham's family was here conveyed to the believing families of the Nati- 01 s , and fo the Pro rife and the Seal Baptifm were here applied to the fame families, father and children, as the promife and fcal Circumcifion were to the particular families ctAbrahamf*- thcr and children, and fo here came the Nations to be blc fled in Abrsham} and Abraham here began to be the father of many Nations. The which may be yet made more to appear, if the time be looked upon, when the Apoftles were fent to teach or difciplc thefe Nations, juft when Circumcifion lay a dying fas I may fo fay) and expiring, or ccafingtobc a fcal of admjniftration unto the Jewim Church, a very fit time, the very time for the L^rd to appoint Baptifm, and to cnlive it for rhe fcal, to come in place of the other, and perform the fame ofh:e in ■■.' < C hur- ches of the Gentiles , as the other did in the Chore, of the J tfSj namely, to let in the believing parents with their chil- dren* Look Chriftian Infants may be taught as well as the Jews. 81 L >ok again into Rom. 1 1. 23, 8c 24. thcfc Gentile and Pagan Nation? were to be taken into the place of the Nation of the Jews } now upon this their cutting effand cafting out,and thefe wild olives were to have the fame engrafting into the good Olive, as thenatural branches had : bat they and their children were grafted in, and now they and their children are cut off; fo thefe and their children, of the Nations here, were in the like manner here cngrai£:d and implanted into Chrift , and therefore baptized, Row.6.5. I&c a? the other circumcifcd. Laftly, what a great change would there have been elfe in the heart and love of Chrift, if now he, who rebuked the Apo- ftles for htndring the little children of the Jews to come unto him, yea who embraced them in his arms, laid his hands upon them, and buffed them, mould now himfelf in this comman- dementuntohis Apoftle9, to teach, difciple, and baptize the Nations, not mink them the children of thefc Nations in the like manner a« to Baptifm, as he did the children of Abraham as to CircurHcilion, but leave them out , or forbid them to come, or be brought unto him , as if he had now no delight, or took no pleafurc in the Infantry of the Gentiles, whereas himfelf long before fpakcof this very time, Ifa.49.22. Behold, I mil lift up my hands to the Gentiles , and fet up wyjiandard un- to the people , and they Jhall bring thy fons in their arms er bo- fonis, and thy daughters jhall be carried upon their Jhoulders, But why did not Chrift here put in, baptize the Nations and their feed, as he did in the firft adminiftration, Circumcifc the Jews and their feed > The Anfwer is made in the very Qucftion, Be- caufc he did it in the firft adnriniftration of Circumcifion, there was no need of doing it again ; and betides , children having once a right to be accounted as belonging to Chrifts Church, and to be reputed viiiblc Members thereof, and no forfeiture made thereof on their part, or bar put In by Chrift or any o- ther pcrfon of authority, they are alwaies fo to be reckoned o£ yea they arc here put in again and mentioned, in the difciplcd Nation, and compreheniivcly included in Them, baptize them, the Nadons difcipled, which confift of parents and their chil- dren, which make them up. Again,if the children had not been included herein thc(e Na« tlcnsjwhat a great change had here bin made in the latitude and L 1 1 extent 82 Chnjtian Infant i may be taught at well as the Jem. extent oi the Covenant, as to the iwbjcft thereof, I mean this particular of children,and that without warning given,* here- by fomc other provifions or courfc might have been fought for and fipplicatcd at Gods hands, for the good of their f uls? for by this your rule of fhuttine cut children from Bap ifm, by the power of this commandement, according to your interpre- tation, if a Jew (feould convert to Chrift, and become a Chri» ftian, anvi bclievein Chrift iome in th. -fl fh, h: flioold be in a worfe condition as to his child i.han before, as who may not be baptized, wh rf-as before he might be circumcifed, and the pa- rents taich in Chi ftwM be a loft and pre j id tec to his child; and both p.rent and child m »y think it to bj a wot f Covenant than the former, whereas iriv bur one and she fatrc, and there- fore when he was a Jew, hi * child w^sciFcttmcifed, fo when he becomes aCrriitian, rrs child ;«o.b baptized. And thus I have, out ui thi; Tx f Ma: then? /% 19. where- in your parry glorieth fo ma ;h, ( u •' I prgatc c > re'l you, that herein is not defcrib^ che pi iwr, I ftitqtionoj Bpum, buconeJyan enlargement of tjic -ApoftlesQommtffion) 1 have evinced a corners jiidemmr ioi b'-tpiizm...' of bi^n'so' Be ievers: you (perhaps) looked for a comiti - d xpreft in fo many let- ters and fyllablcs, €0, b.ip iz- the chikb n oi B Iicvcrs; but is it not good and ifF.ftuai (it ought tob ) if in hid d in the fenfe and rot aning of the words? are not Mai ifrrare4 and Mini- ftcrstoo (by youcleav.) meanc in rh.it corm ^ndement, Ho- nour thy Father "i are nor en?ic anH narred / kcvA ife comp i ed in that command, Thou fhilc do no n u der f yet neither thofe nor theft are expved before , and who need doubt but thar children are inc'u !cd in the word Nations? being a part, and a great parr or th m, and comprehended in every ad- minift ation of grace and mercy efp.cialiy. A id now I aving the commandenienc of Chrift for Infant Bip.iii, I proceed to the fecond kinde'oi Warrants ycu call for ; namely, tic example of Chrift and his Apc.ftles; for fo thefc two you y b a uf> and carry out in this and all points, Com- mands and Examples, when your felf, as a Bullock unaccufto- medtorhey.ke, n Ithcr d<', nor can (hew cither of th: two, for your wild, untamed, and untaught opinion. A*, for the example cf Chrift, it is a vain thing to demand it, as who bapiiz d none , as I have told y ju formerly out of the Evangclift. And for the Apo files, they baptized but a few, as whofc bu« fin^fs and work was cfpecially, and lay for planting Churches, and raifing of foundations out of grown perfons converted by them out of Judaifm and Gcniili(m, as is cxprefly fct down, 1 Cor.l.i 3 & 17, And therefore if Chrift fent them not to bap- tize, but to preach the Gofprl, (not to baptize, either efpeci- ally in reference to preaching and converting, or generally, all whoi-71 thry preached unto or converted : ) it was not part of their commiflion to do fo, nor any violation of Chrifts com- mand, for them not to do fo ; for then S.Paul would, and mould rather have asked God pardon, than given him thanks, as here he doth , for that he baptif d none of the Corinthiens Li 1 2 (whom 84 Chrijiian Infants may be taught as well as the Jervf. (whom notwiihthiidina in Cbrijt Jefus he begatt through the Go- }peL> iCor.4.15 .) fave fome few hcrcalfo named and mention- ed by him* This! acquaint you with ac firft, to It you underftand the reafon of fo frequent mention of the Bapiifm of b.lieving Converts, and of fo much filencc in Scripture of Infant-Bap- tifm, and to ihcw you farther the irrationality of your de- mand, who, as your friends and father Jefuites were wont to call upon us, for Names, Names of Proteftancs before Lmket's daies, now clamour me for Example.*, Examples of baptized] In- fants in the ApoiHes time : Yea, to prefent to you the inva- lidity of your reafon, fo frequently urg d, the Apoftles did not practife conftantly the baptizing Infants, and therefore it is not to be fo done. For (befides, that for you to reafon negatively from the Scripture in a matter of fact, as here from the not-pra- fticc of the Apoftlcs, to the unlawfulncfs of our practice, and fact, fhewcth you are indeed averfe, not onely to humane, but even Divine Arts and Sciences there being no Divinity, little humanity, in fuch arguments, fitter for children than men, for the (bales of a Higlcr, than the Schools of a Difputcr,) I have ihewed you good reafon why the Apoftlcs ( yea the Apoftlcs own reafon, which (I fuppofc) you will not deny to be good) did not baptize all, either grown perfons whom they convert- ed, or their Infants by name , and fometimes did not baptize ac all, when they had converted people. And miy not I now turn the fame Argument upon and againft your fclf3 and put the fame yoke upon your neck ? There is no practice of any Apo- ftle to be (cen or read of in the whole Gofpcl, or Adit of the Apoftlcs, of their baprizmg any Chriftians child, when he was grown up to years, and therefore your practice in doirg Co is unlawfull and unwarran'ablc, you (1 believe) would think this but mad arguing, but you know the man and his commum* catistt. 1 Kings 911. From the Afts of the Apoftles there may be, but from the non^Actsof the Apoftfes there may not be made or drawn a good reafon to enforce or enforce a practice. There is recorded no practice of any Apoftle , admitting women to the Lords Supper, or example of any woman receiving the Lords Supper (more than of Infants receiving Baptifm, and the Ap ftles admitting Whole Haufiolds baptized. 85 Si r ll'„™ Xre • vou will fa? «ff*d but tingle, are meant to be baptifed, them, and their hou(h 'd* ; as Gaius hereby Paul. So Cornelius by Peterr yea the E ruch , bapiifdalonc by Philipy might proaire his ch'ldren, it he '>ad any, obc bap- tifed by fome oro her Evang^ical minifter coming into thufe coafts, and fj where the houfh -Id of 4ri rcbuks 3 and th houf- hold of NarciJJus are mentioned, a &ontam 1610 A id the houlhold oiOnefiphorusy 2 Zim,q 1 lds, were barren, not a Mother of a Child, °r a young one amongft them allfFor though there fhould not have been in them , Infants or Suckling?, yet, if but a y^ unglir.g and a Child of fome years, all would have been but a? one, as to their Underftarding and confclTing*) Or yi u mart thus divide the houflaolds, fa» you are good at dividing houfes and ho fet hoMs, ft'ing the Husband againft the Wife,and alienating the Children from Father & Mo her, which is a very bad praftice,) and fay, that not all the Houftnld was baptifed, whertauhe T\xfi Whole hottfiottldf b aptifed. 8 7 Tcxc faith txprefl/, He and all his hcujhold were baptifcd, buc fome major pirt, or the moft considerable part of the houfe, and when it is faid » the houf: of Ifracl was circumcifed, its mcanr not o\ a parr, either major or moft confiderable, but of the whole houfe , as to the Parents and Children , and Servants alfo or Prof.lyr.e8 under their education and inftrufti* on. I do not vvotdcr, you cannot abide our tlniverfity, Arts , and Sciences, Tncfe cannoc abide you and fuch rcafonings and interpretations ; the Apoftlcs r>aptifed fueh and all their houf- ftold*, that is, the gracr part, the people of Growth ; for thojgh fometirnes f.ich 1 word may be fo taken , where all arc not capable of the thing cloneor fpoken of, you muft prove ic to be f > hire meant in aTi th • pi ices, wfvrc the Apottles baptifed fuch and all chfif hb (holds , which you can never doe, the cx- preir Lett r (which y >u ire fo for, ) isrxpicfl/ againft you>fuch and ill hci ha dh 'ds of wh"ch many times alfo children are not on-:ly fome ot all , and apa^tof the whole, hot (inyonr T-arns, one of fhrm ar lead) th? major par ( Uay not the ntuit confiderable) bui I iay a capable part too,hut if in :11 or a- ny of thefch >u(h >lds, there was but one infant, or anyone you ag -tripling, you are gon , astothe Apoftlcs practice who baptised rhe bl-cver, and all his houfhuld ; and incapacity here is none to hinder either our intci p.etdtion or the Apoftlcs rniniftradon ; for if there had been any in the houlhold uncapsb!i. The Apoftie would not have baptifed the whole houihoH, or the belecvcr, and all hbhoulhold: and I have abundantly flawed before from the Apoftie , that Infants of B-lccvrr* are capable of baptifm, V.rls 32. Now if be faid, th k the Apoftie preached and fpake the word to the Gaoler, All that were in the Gaolers houfe, fo all n i^ht beleevc and be baptiurd ; ic i* true, the Apoftie did fo fpeak the word to all ca« pabL-ofit, but yet at th- 31. Vcrfe, he fpeaksof thcfalvation of all the houfe upon the ttarms of the Gaolers beleeving, for that the promifc and Covenant being fo made at firft , held ftill to b;I; evens, parents and their children and here alfo fcrvants, brcauf. it is faid, he and all his , were baptifed in the 33. vcrfe, S> it appears to me , thar the Gaoler himfelf onely beleeved, and had an inward work of Faith wrought in the heart upon Tome 1— ^M__ i"ii ■■! - iM m _ ■ — — — -, _ . SS whoie Houjholds baptized. ibme fpccial evidence he received ot Chriit come in the tic£b9 whereupon he andhi*, (of whom, the other Pagans of his fa- mily there is nothing fa;d as to their faith J whether fcrvants of growth or children und. r agr9 the nbolehouuSold were bapti* zed immediately , in relation to the Fathers and Matter?, undertaking and engaging for themfclves and their hou£ holds. And indeed (to keep to my particular) if fuch in thefe , or our houfholdf, as did, or do a&uaily bclceve and profefTe, were and are to be baptifed onely, why was the hcufhold, as of the Gaoler before, who oncly there beleevcd (as I have (hewed) fo: the houfliold of Ljdia> (<;f whom onely, it is faid that the Lord opened her heart to belecve in Chrift ) baptif- ed > Surely the Apoftlcs would not bring in a different Admipi- ftration, now in the houfholdsof beJeevingChriftians , wne« ther out of Jewes or Pagai s, from that which evrrwasinufe and practice amongft the honftnilds of b. lecving J .we? at firft, and therefore went here according the common cuftom former- ly ufed in time of circumcifion, and where they bapriCcd any bclecving Father of a Family,th=:re they d^d bap.ife, or others for them, the children of the fame houfh >ld, or might have done. Otherwifc, how could they, the ApotKs when they preached the Gofpcl to all Nifions and fo to their houfholdg, how could they bring the blcflingof Abraham into all Nations and their houfhold* (according to the prophecy and promift thereof by God) if they did not apply the Covenant and th-. S a! gene- rally to them and theirs, in (he fame rriahrieras'lt wastohim and his, fo, that the children of befeeveYs might now be bapd£ ed, as formerly they were cirenmcifed ? And laftly I may add this, That when men inthofe dayea were converted from Judaifm or PaganUm , they did (prcba- bly) at their admittance into the Church by raptifm, make an open andfolemn League and Covenant with G -d, before fomc people prefent, to profefllthe Faith of Chrift, they and their houfholds, which Saint Paul may fcem re > put fomc of them in mind of , Ephefians 6.4. Fathers bring up your Children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord ; A- id therefore when the Apoftlcs did baptifc houlho'ds of bcicevers, they did it in relati- on Whole houfholds baptifed. onto the Par run, or others in their ftcad , undertaking and ingaging for themfelves and the children therein. And thin now at laft, and at length too (as all other point*) I have -iTcred unto you thi? Point alfo, of Apoftolical Practice and Examples, for the baptizing of the children snd Infants of believing Parents. I have anfwered all your Quaeres, and ( I hop? ) hare in- formed and furled your judg meat better by my answers, th^n you could do it by your Quaeres (for 1 cannot yet forget, how that a: the end of them \ou lay, tbefe your §h beftow twenty and five meets clofcly written, in anfwerins of your fecond (heer, bucloofcly written, as I have done upon you i firft meet (for I have difpatched hitherto but the one firft meet of your Letter ) and there is good reafon for it. For the fii-ft fh er, for the moll part , pit Quaeres to me, in your number twenty on?, and they contained in th?m fome ma- terial and fubftantial things to be anfwered , of a large extent, and great depth 5 and therefore I thought good to give unto ihcm a full and proportionable anfwer , what pains and time f jcver it (bould coll mc. But that which you propound in your fxond (hect to me , is nothing but certain Confidcrations of your own, againftbaptifm of Infants, and about fomc Texts of S :ripturc, the very froth and barmings of your own head ; the which if I fh iuld let alone unreplied to , as once I was rc- folved, would of thernfelves fink,difp:-r(e, and fall to nothing, Bitjl ft you ill >uld (well and be puffd up in any conceipt of thefe your co- ^derations, as the Bladder is with its own winde, I will as brief]/ as I can, with my Qiort breath , by reafon of my o'd age, blow away your froth, and let out your winde, that fo the holIown:fs and fhallowncfs of them may appear to the R?ad r. The THc you fct over your firft Confi deration, is this, More particular^ about the Votfrine of Rukifm (Bipcifm) coaler thefe Argument* proved by clear and plain Scripture. Sir,thts is a talfe Tide to your Tra&ate j for if you would have done here more Mom parti- oo Inf. Baftifm doth not overthrow the Covenant of Grace, particularly, it lh >uld have been, and you ihoidd have laid, about the DocVine of Infant Bipiifm : for if you bring not Ar- guments, not oncly about B-iptifm, asyoufay, but againtt In- fant-baptifm, and thefc proved by clear and plain Scripture, ! fhall notconlider then), neither have you confidered wcji of our difference. I* Y^ubidme Confider thai the Votlrwe of Infants Babtifw overthrows thr nature of the Covenant of grace , and tie whoe (whole) Gofpelof Chri[i ; whyfo? hecaufe the Covenant of grace and Go [pel of Chriji jtands upon the account of faith a> dual in there one ( heir own) perfons, as appears m John 3 36. and John 5. 24. But Infants Bubtifm fiand upon the account of the faith in there ftheirj Parents or Surties ^SarcCn.*,} (although they have none for themfelves) and fo makfs fuith void and unne- fefery funnecciFaryJ to the perticipation ( participation ) of the Covenant^ Rom. 4 13. Gal. 3. 17 18. , But what do I? did I not f.-.y I would not tranferibe your words of your fecond (hvCt ? but I fee I muft do it , for there is fo much falfe- written Eiglifh in them, that I mutt of nrctflity doit, left if inferib d to my Anfwer, that nny be thoughts mine. Bit to the matter. Baptifm of Infants of Believers, doth not overthrow, but eftablilh the Covenant and Gofpcl of Grace, bcamcitfealcth and ex cutethit. Neither doth the Covenant of Grace, and the Gofpcl, ftand upon the account of a&ual Faith in all mens own ptrfons, butonclyfuch as being grown in years, are converted trom Paganifn, thefc muft make profef- iion of faith, before th:y can come into the Covenant, and be fcaled. But aftnal faith is not a Condition required, astothe Covenantor Sral in Infants. Your Txt therefore of John 3.36* is not to the pu.p^f , as which onely fets evcxlatting life upon (to ufc your phrafej the account of actual faith, which I grant, and fodoth the next "I\x , John 5. 24. as appears, for that he b gins with, and fp-aks ot fuch as do hear the Word of God5 and beleevc in Chrift, which is not appliablc to In- fants but grown men : And as to your Inference, The bap- tifm of Infants ft mds upon theaccouncof the ii being in Co- venant together withth-ii Parents, and not upon thcacco intof 'the Faith in rhcit Parents or Sureties, bnr only fo far, as the Faith or the Parent* fcrves to mew them a feed of the faithful ; and the Faith of the Sureties undertakes for their education in nor the fidteand nature of the Church. 91 in, and proteffion ot Faith aitcrwards: How itrangJy alio do you pervert that Texr, Romans 413? For it is there faid, tie promije was made to Abaham^ that he (hould be the teir of the world , was not to Abraham and his feed through tht Lawt hut thrbujh the Right eoufnejfe of t atth 5 Which he had yet being uncircumcifed, to whom God upon this account of this faith, made th Promise both to himfelf and his Seed $ you would hare the faith ihcrcipwken of to be the faich of the Seed or Infant, as holding it ncccflary to the participation of the Covenant, and fo fallirie borh Covenant and Ttxr, which both, together with you' la(T,GW. 3. 17 do quite overthrow your h\ft overthrowing ConliJ-rarion ( for Argumentation here is none.) M ^re ot this you (hall have hereafter. Your fecond Con (ideation, becaufe it hath a Narration, yea a repetition of what you fet down in your firft Page, about the nature of the ftate (So you fpeak, whereas rather you mould fay, the ftitc or the Nature J of Chrifts true viliblc Church under the Gofpcl , to the mewing of which you here onely defcribe Chriftg true invlible Church , and therefore etc the TtX 8 you did before, and add fome more , that fpeak onely of invisible Members, fu:h as you call Saints m?dw fo by the im- mortal Seed, new Creatures by the benefit of Regeneration. I mall therefore fay nothing to that here, but rcfci you, and efpc- cially the Reader, to what I have largely before difcou^fed, about th: ftate and nature ( for I will corrtft my fclf too ) of the Church both viliblc and invfible ; for though you may (p rhapsj havenofich care of me, I muft and will be care- rs j 11, that I dead not the Reader, by any tedious and vain re- pct't'ons and Tautologies. Yet this I fay in an wcr to it, That Infant- Baptifm in the Church, is fo far from overthrowing fas yuu agu^) the na- ture and fhte of CbnftN true vifiblc Church, thac if is rarhcr much cotifi' m-'d and eftabl'fti.d , incrcafed and enlaiged there- by, beca ifc thereby more are admitted in prefenr, number? vi- fible, and are engag d to be for the future, viiible pr^feflbrs and confeffjrs of CJrift ; yea, and the invifible Church alfo is not overthrown, but upheld and augmented by our Biptifm of In- fants, as wh.rcby many Infants arc not on'ly d dicated and confccratcd U/ito Chrill, but are alfo by Bapiilm, as a Seal M ro m a and 9 2 Infs Bap.Jiandeth not npon Account of Faith in the Sureties* and Means (as I havcih-wcd) regenerated, and fo fitctd and prepared the better for Heaven and happinefs. And whereas you add, That Infants Baptifm is grounded upon the Relation they have to the Church, by generation onelyy or by the meer pr&;t fion o) * faith end repentance tn the Parents and Sureties* 1 fee you are corrup- ted in your Principles, and grounds of Divinity. Once more I c 11 you (\ pray learn it now , for I will teach you it no more) for the Readers fake, that lnianti Baptifm i« grounded and toundationcd upon the Covenant of God made with the believing Parents, for himfclf and Infants, and that which you ca*l Generation, doth but raifc up the ground and foundation -Covenant to bring k into fome aft of viiibiliry in relation to the Church, for the Seal thereof. And fo alfo ln« fants have not their relation unto the Church by generation ( rather by this they have rc:ation to the world ) nor by the meer faith and repentance of the Parents and Sureties , but by the Covenant and the Seal thereof, in both which Infants arc imereffrd together with their Parents, have they their relation unto the Church. For which you may fee ^45* 2. 39, 8c 41. | becaule you give me no Text here , which I wonder at ) of which I have|your confidaration in particular to perufe anon. Oncly I fhall add a word or two about Sureties in the Bap- tifm of Infants, becaufe I do not remember that hitherto, be- fore now, you have made any mention of them 5 and for that I fee you are here in an errour about them ; and you would pus a flur upon us, and a kinde off! inder upon our Church, as if In- fant Baptifm flood upon account of faith in the Parents and Surc« tie*, although (fay you;) they have none for thcmfelves. 1 will adde fomewh-iit, although they have more than your (elf. 1 may fay the one, a& well as you fay the othrr. Know then Sir, that thecuftum of having Sureties atthebap- titfng of Infants, hath been very ancient in tbt Church , when Tfurh was in its prime light , and Primitive purity, though thereupon it is the left liked, becaufc the mure unlike to the new upHart and out- (taring novel ifms of thefe later Age?, and laft declining times ; and their office was, as to bear wimefs of the birth ot Infants of Chriftian Parents, and therefore were called Atteftersoi WitntfTcs (as at this day J fo to anfwer for the faith, and take upon them the educadou of the baptized In- fants, Inf.Bap.Jiandetk not upon account of Faith in the Sureties. 93 fants and for this they were called Sponfors or Sufccptors. Hereupon the Infant to be baptized, although he did not profefs himCclf to be Believer with his own mouth, nor could, yet being asked and interrogated (as the manner was) Docft thou believe? he anfwercd in the mouth and tongue of his Sponfors or Soreties, or the very Parcntf , or they (which is all one) an? fwcred in ftcad and place of the Infant, 1 believe. /\nd with? outfuchprofclfijnof fiith, Infants publickly were not bapti- zed in the Church. Thu< in and by the judgement of charity, the Ancient? held and judged the Infant to believe, and that if it could fp-ak with its mouth* it would anfwer, that it belie- ved, and becau.'e it could not, they appointed (as before) Sponfors and Sureties in the funi: and place of the Infant, to anfwer, 1 believe. And in thi* fenfe alfo (befides others I have given) were In« fants of Chriftians called of old, Believers, becaufc they did in fome manner profefs faith, in and by the mouth and words of their Sponfors, Sureties and Parents^ True, its uncertain and unknown to the Church, or man , whether the Infant doth be- lieve or not , but unleft the Church had fo judged by the judgement of charity (which, faith the Apoftle, bclieveth all things, hopcth all things) the Infant to believe, (he would not fiave appointed Sureties and Sponfors in the name and place of the Infant, fo to anfwer ; and urtlefs the Infant it felf had (p anfwered, in the words and mouth of its Sponfors and Sure- ties, (hi, 1. e. the Church, would have forbid it to be bap- tized. Thus I have told you of the ancient manner of the Primitive Baptifms with Sureties and Sponfors ; you mud not now here call upon me for proof hereof out of the plain and dirtel: S.rip* ture : for I acknowledge this ancient Cuftom, and many a owe in ufc amongft the firft Chriftian Churches > is not exprcfly pre- fcribed in Scripture ffor then it might be concluded abfolutely necclftry for a!i ages and perfons to follow) fo neither is it for- bidden explicitly in Scripture, and therefore not irtcrly to be rejected, asunlawf ill cobc; ufed, as which was for the good of rhn, let God himfcJf be judge, and that his Word, Geuefis 17. r 4. He bath broken my Covenant', who? the child, whofc fl Ih or his fore- skin is not citcumcifcd : fo alfo he, whofc flcfti is not warned with the water of Biptifm; which latter, if not done, or ordered to be done by you, who arc Parents to the Child, the breach and overthrowing the Covenant lieth upon you, and not upon the chiid, to anfwer for. You have broken the Lo-d< Covenant-, and the Lord may break in upon you, as he did upon Mofes for ncglcft of circumcifing his Seed, Exodus 4.24. Gonfiderof if, isthe Lords mercy you are not broken and coufum-'d ; lee the riches 01 his goodnefs, and forbearance, and long fa tf. ring, lead you to r penrancej the Covenant'Go- fpcll , Chriit being the fame under both Adminiftration?, God will look (and jtiftly may and rouftj that bit Covenanters or covenanted with, even Infants, (hill be now partakers of Baptifm in a proportionable time fif there be no mtercoming excu fable impediment ) like as the fame were of Circum- cifion. And now alfo, before I fee upon your nexr Confederation, oniider with yourfelf, whether your D jctrinc of baptizing B.Iievers on:lyf and thereupon your not baptizing of Infants of Believers, until they come to have a&ual Faith, and to a co lfcllion of it, doth n it rather over throw the flat e and nature of chritfs viiible Church under (he Gofpel? I have largely proved before, and that out of Ttxts you here cite to the con- trary, Romans 1.7. i Cor. 1.2, &\ TrutChrifts viiible Church under the G ;fpel conliiteth and is made up of viiible and out- ward members and profefTors, (fome of which, though un- known unto U', are members alfo of the inviiible Church under th: Go ''pel J and I have alfo clearly (hewed you, that Biptifm is a means of entrance and admiflion into the viiible Church, whereby Infants (who by vertuc of Gods Covenant may alfo belong to th: inviiible Church as members J are reckoned 8c en- rolled, & even made members of the viiible Church. N jw then, whether of us do overthrew the State and Nature of Chrii'ta viiiSlc Church under the Gofpc), wc, who help to uphold and increafc it, by our admitting and initiating of our Infants to be viable members thereof through our bapciling of them in their Infancy 9 6 Inf Baptifm overthroweth not the chief ends of Baptifm, Infancy, or you , who, by your not baptifing of them for the (pace of 15. or \6. \ears and more, and fomctimcs as much more, do all that while with* hold vifiblc members from the Church , yea and do all that while leave theni to a vilible ftanding and being under the kingdom of darknefs, (though in- vifibly it may be otherwise) which is moft oppofitc to the Church of Ghrift, Let the next Reader judge , for you are neither fit nor able to judge herein, as who arc already prejudi- ced, pre judicated, and prepafT fled with a Spirit of d Juiion as totke Nature and S:ate ut Chrifts vifiblc Church under the Gofpcl. 5 You bid mCjCoriidcr, that Infants- babtifw, it overthrows the end for which \rue babtifm was appointed » For the Cfatf one oj Chrifts true bab.ifm of beleevers, was to difiinguifh thevue Church fro-M the World : Col. 2. 1 2. Compared with Verfc 20 GaL3.26.anda7.Aft* 2.41. But Infant baptifm everthroweth this diflintfionybccattfe alt are admitted in by it, and no dijtindion viade. Sir, I not think ofir untl jufc now, or elfeluVu'd have asked you, a Qn^re, W y you alwayes wrirc it Bat »tifn», when as you are fo great an enemy to Babc-baptifm ? I (hall be bold, coanfwer it, thus , becaufe you do To babble about baptiln'. For is not thi* in prefent, fas there hith been much of it be- fore ) profane and vainb ablings which the Apoftle bid* you fhun, to talk of the end for which baptifm is appointed, and then tocailit, aCbitfcne$ And then to initance, in thcdiftinguifrV ing of the true Church from tfac world, as a chrf ore , which is theinferiourone; and laftly to cite holy Scriptures which are too no fuch purpofe,is not this prophaneand vain bablingJ But I anfwer to the matter. 1. It is an unfound and lameafTrtton or propofiion, to fay,that Infants baptifm is to be rej ..&td tor ever, C*$ you con- clude your Confideration* wi h , and « hcrefore mean fo in eve- ry one J if it fhould overthrow one chief end, for which true baptifm was appointed , when as in the mean, it upho d? five other ends, as chief, ifnotchicfcr,whKh I hav* reckoned up to you in my fife warrantable Rcafon for baptifm, to which 1 refer you. SrHow will you prove Infants baptifm to overthrow the end why Inf. Baftifm doth not overthrow the chief ends of Baptifm, g 7 why true baptifm was appointed? becaufc itoverthrowcihthc chief one, which wis to diftinguiih the true Church from this ; but how if there be the ends, as well as the end why true bap- tifm was appointed? how, if amongft the ends, there be chicfer ones, than that chief one you mention? how, if I n» fancs-baptifrn do not overthrow thole five chiefcr ones, though (fuppofed oncly) it mould overthrow one chief one ? H:rc be now Come Qjercs for you. Bit now, how prove you alfo, The chief one end of true baptifm to be, to diftinguiih the true Church , from the world ? you cite, Col. 2 1 2 1 and 20. There is mention made of baptifm and the world, and a fpirirual end and erf d of baptifm, that therein the Coloflians were buried in Chrift and rifen with him, ( alluding to the ancient manner of baptifing by immerlion and emer(ion,to lignifie rhem both,) & they were freed from the Rudiments and Ordinances of the World, that is of the Legal oe:onomy of the Jcwes, and what's all this to the purpofc of baptiiros being a chief end, to diftinguifh the true Church from the Heathen World, which is alfo but an external end? And though the Text fpeak of grown perfon?,and Heathens converted, yet it is true alio of all cleft and regenerate Infants (of which there arc many you cannot denv it) tbac they are buried with Chrift in baptifm, and rifen-w'n h him, &c. So that you get nothing by thisTexc, againft InrantP-baptifm, They father gain by you hence for their b.iptifm ; But ther's nothing at all gained for the diftingu (hing the true Church from the World by baptifm , as the chief end there- of. So that other Text, Galatbiam 3. 26. Is nothing to your purpofc, yea againft your purpofe, for it fpeak«on-»y of the inward and Ipiritual efTc&s of Biptifm, andofbapjfm into Chrift , that thereby the Galatkians had put on Chrift , and were lo incorporated , as they were onc[in Chrift, fo that there was neither J^w, nor Gentile, bond* or free, &c.Sj far is this Texr from (hawing the diftinftion of the true Church from the World, to be the chief end of baptifm, that it rather and onely fh-wr, the fpiritual Union of true Chriftians with Chrift, to be one end and a chief oik, which alfo a1! Infants N n n Regenerate c 8 I*fi Bap.diflingHijhethfrom Pagans and Heathens. regenerate and baptifed «into Chrift do attain unto, at well at thefc grown Galatbiam and converted Heathens, I profeffe 1 never read in all my life time, Texts of Scripture, more impertinently cited, and 1 had once thought to have let your Citations of the word alone, and onely have replyed to your wordsjBut that I honor the word,and you do diftionor it, by citing it for that which is not in it, even as Chrift faid, he honored the Father,but the Jcwes diftionorcd him,by faying, he came not from the Father. Your Iaft place, though it comes fomc what neerer that the former , as to an external addition of the 5000. Souls unto the Church, by baptifm* yet it asfarfrom mentioning any diftinttion of the true Church from the world, and making it the chief end of baptifm , as the other before. 3. Infant 'baptifm doth not overthrow but fupport that end, the diftinguiftiing of the true Church from the World : that is, from the World out of the Church , which is the Pagan and Hcathenim World, fyou muft mean this, or elfe you fay no- thing, feeing there is a Chriftian World , ora World of Chri- ftians, even all that profeffe the Gofpcl, and embrace Jcfm Chrift J for if you mean by Church, the elec> true beleevers 5 and by the World , the Reprobate and falfe Beleevers, within the fame, neither our Infant- baptifm , nor your baptifm of be* leevers, fas you call it J confefling Faith, when grown in years, can make fuch a diftinftion > for at amongft our Infants , fo a. raongft the grown Beleevers baptifed, there may be and are undoubtedly many Reprobates, St Hypocrites, and Falfeheartcd ProfcfTors i fuch of both forts come to Biptifm, without any diftinguiftiing by us ; and go from baptifm without any diftin« Sionof fuch by it. And therefore 4. Its a pittiful reafon you add , and I pitty you for it, that In fan t« baptifm doth notdiftinguifti the true Church from the World , becaufe all are admitted in by it $ True, all of the Church are admitted in by it, (What need a diftincTion in the Seal, where there is a conjunction in the Covenant)and this very admitting all of the Church profefimg Chrift, or born of thofc that profefle Chrift ( upon both which tcrmc;, the Covenant runneth) doih evidently prove, thatwc hold#ftriftly,and uphold ftrongly, the diftn&ion of the Church from Inf. BapJ/JiiftgHTJheth from Pagans and Heathens. pp from the World of Pagans and Heathens, whom we exclude- andkeep off from baptifm , untill they learn and bciccve the Gofpcl and make proftflion. And now 5. Confidcr, that your Non-baptifm of your In- fants until they be grown to great years able toprofefs iaith,&c doth overthrow the end of bapttifm and a chief one, the diftinguiftiing of the true Church from the World, for that none of them are admitted into the true vifiblc Church, by it : for tell me, whats the diftin&ion and difference betwixt the World Infants, I mean the Infants of Pagans and Heathen;, and the Church-Infant?, the Infants of Chriftians and Profeflbrs, but this onely of baptilm, admitting thefe into the vifiblc partici- pation of the Covenant, and Communion with the Church of God, for want of which, the others are kept Out as aliens and ftrangcrs, until they by faith and confeflion come to claim the fame Seal of admittance. I fay again coniidcr this, and lay tt clofely and fcrioufly to your heart, that during the years you detain your Infants and Children from baptifm,which is their birth- privilege and their Covenant-Seal and their diftinttion- mark, you leave them in a Heathenift) and Gentile (late, as Aliens and Grangers from the Commonwealth of Chriftians , and Covenants of Promifc, Them, I fay you leave without Hope, as being without the Seal of the Promifc, and your felves in doubt, about them. The revealed things belong toyouand your Children; The Promifc , and the Promife to be fealcd , belongs to you and your Children, to your Children, upon their birth, as their Privilege and due, Let them have it, and leave the fecret things to God, to whom they belong, their Salvation by Election ; for he that elcfted them to fuch an end , hath clcttcd them to th: means. And thus you have been thrice overthrowing of Infant^Bap- tifm, yet have you not given ic any fall * For though in words youfeemto make it the great overthrower, as if it overthrew the Covenant and Gofpel, the vifiblc Church, the ends of true baptifm , yet Infant- baptifm, and all thefe ftand very well to» gether, each upholding the other, and thongh you would in- deed feem as the great Goliah and overtho vcr o little David, and fo have given thefe three retches and girds at Infants bap* N n n 2 rifinP I oo InfanUBaptifm dijimgu'ipHih from Pagans and Heathens. tifm,ics rather to your own overthrow, and of your own bap- tifrh, and yet (\ perceive) you have another ftrokc tocome, to the 21 of JLzekjel 27. God faid oijerufalem , purpo« fcinp, to deftroy it> I will overturn , overturn^ overturn^ and it fhdll be no more j but in your defign for the ruine of Infant- bapiifm, you exceed the wrath 2nd indignation, and have gon beyond that threefold Ingcmination, faying, I will overthrow, overthrow, overthrow, overthrow the do&rinc of Infant-bap- tifrn. But as curft Cowes have ftiort horns , fo ftrong words have Cmoft an end) weak hands,you have done but little yet by your three highly and ftrong'y conceited confiMcrations, and I f bJecve) thefourth will be like the former. Which , becaufe there arc fo many , In and outs and round aboucs in it, 1 will reduce it to a fhort form. Ihe baptifing of Beleevers or Veciples , is onely txprefly cent' nanded tn Scripture , as in Matthew 28. 19. R4ar\\6 \%.John 4. j 2 Ads 2.38. and 41. A&s %. 37. and 38. But Infants bap" tifm over thrcweth and prevents that babtifm which is onely exprei fly commanded iu Scripture ? Therefore what? you infer nothing , left it fhould be a Syllogifm , a Lirnm of the profane Univcrhty human Learning, but I know your meaning,oneIy mend in your copy at home, {Vecipies and Babtifm) as you write here, and make it » Vifciples and Baptifm » left your friends think you call the baptifm of beleevers onely, a babifm. and derive your Difci pics from Veciples ^ decipicnts or decei- vers. You muft pardon me, for not turning to your Texts,& fome of them I have already handled, 8c (hewed they were nothing to your purpofe, and others, 1 (hall meet within in a fitter place,l know them without book, that none of them all do exprefly command the baptifing beleevers onely ; Which they muft do» if you cite them for your purpofe : For who ever denyed the baptifing of beleevers, as I have formerly written ? Again as thefe Texts, do command , fome of them , exprefly the bap- tifing of beleevers, as Atls 1.38. So fome other doth but con- dition for, and propound Faith unto baptifm of grown perfons, as AUs%. 57. And another mentions faith and baptifm as a joynt requilit to Salvation, as Markji6.\6. And another hath nothing at all in it either of faith, or baptifm, or com- mand Infant- Baptifrn difttngaifisth from. Paga&r and Heathen /, i o i mand , "as John 412. A id for the ht\ place fin your paper, rhefirtt.) lookback, where its largely handled, and you thall fee (you mighr h we feen ic in the Texc it felf ) there is no ex« prcflf: command for baptifrn of belcevcr*?, b it ofDifciples, and therefore you did well to add , to beleevei -*,. (or Deciplc?) and arc not Children of belecWng Parents, Difciplcs too, if not belecvcrs? you (hall find (if upon your firft reading you did nor ) Them alfo to be commanded th:re, under the Notion of Difci- ples or a difcipled N Stop your cars (O ye baptized men, women, and children) at the voice of the charmers, for they charm Bcither wifely, nor foundly, nor fweetly, as to you and your good and benefit j not wifely for you, but fubtlely for themfelvcs and their party, who having forfaken their firft love, and renounced their firft Bsptifm, now compafs about to make you their profelytes, and fo two-fold more the children of Hell than themfelvcs , if yc after fo many ftrong Rcafons, andfo fair a warning , will alfo renounce your Biptifm , wherein yc renounced the Devil and all his works. A chief one of the Devils works is, to draw peo- ple to renounce thek Baptifm, the mark and Seal of their Co- venant with God, & Gods wkh-them , as he ufeth to do with Witches and Sorcerers,, before he entrcth into Covtraft with them, and give them a mark andSial of their League with him, and his with them. Not foundly or truly for you , but hypocritically and faliiy for themfelvcs, do they thus charm , as who onely do pretend the Word and Commandcmcnt, but can (hew you none , nor example for any Chriftian once baptized, whoever was bapti- zed again. Thedcfirc to have you baptized again, as the Im- poftors would have had the baptized Galathians circumcifed, that they may glory in your fiefh, famoft vain and Qiamcfull Galar.tf.ia. glory) and make you tread under foot the Sen $f God, and to count the blood of the Covenant, wherewith ye were fantiified, an unholy thing* and do defpite unto the Spirit of grace ; at lcafl u grieve the holy Spirit of God, whtrewitb ye were fealedmto the day of redemption, if yc belong to the Election of God. Such a grievous, hainous , and unfound thing it is to renounce your Chriftian Bsptifms: Look therefore diligently to your fclvc?, as the Authour to the Hebrews hath it, left any man among you fall from the Grace of God, (even that Grace offered in thcSa. cramentof Biptifm to you, and (itmaybcj received by you therein) left any root of bitternefs (fringing up inyou, trouble you, left there be any prof ant perfon amongd you, as Efau , who for one morfelof meat fold his birth-right ', thus Efau ddpifed his birth- Hebtl2tI$),<§ right, Genefis-2%, £4. Is not Baptifm your birth-rigtt jlfo ? is not your renouncing of your Infant- Baptifm, a del pi- fing of your Infant Birth-right, and a breaking or pulling off, 104 ^Z** "ft renouncing of Infant- Baptifm. or a trultrating or evacuating the Seal either way, a defpifiog it, and a profaning of the Covenant of Grace? and will ye thus part with your Birth- right, firft .Baptifm and fell it fat it wcrcj to thefe fupplanting Jacobs , and all for a mefs of twice- fod pottage? fuch is feconciNB >ptifm, or rebaptiMtion. Will you leave your Manna that came down firft from Heaven, loathing it, to luft after, and hunt after thefe Quails, and lift? n to their Quail piper, who fay, What b this M^nna? nothing before our eys but this Manna. Remembcr,that whileft the flefh of thcQjails eaten in contempt of Manna ; was yet between their teeth ere the Quails were chewed, the wrath of God was kindled araongft the people, to the fmiting of thim with a great plague (bcfidcs that the fl?(h afterwards came out at their noftrils, and was loathfom unto them: ) and fo fear ye, If ft while the water of the new Dippers or fecond Baptifm, recei- ved in contempt of youi firli B p u, who have the root of bitternefs in them (from which Idehorrcd you) andwhofe mouths a>e full of cmfing and Utterneft 5 like as they have bitter tnv)ing endjitife in ihetr hearts againft Againfi. renouncing of Infant- Fapti/nr. 105 againlt your Mother- Church > and your Baptifm efpeciaily wherein yc were ( ir regenerate at all J born again of water and the Spirit. My Brethren, theft things ought not to be ; doth a Fountain fend forth at the fame place or hole ( of heart or mouth ) fwect water and bitter 1 Hear now ye Benjamites , ( ye left handed Proccftant* )will the Sen ofJeffeMunceT^ who I m;n- tioned but now') give every oneofyou, the Field Ehn.fics, and m' "' 7' Vine-card Privilcdgcs of Chriitand his Church, by their new dipping of you, and make you Captains of thou fands > andCap- tains 01 hundred^ againft your fins, that they (lull not raign, or have dominion over your mortall bodics,or immortall Soules ; that all of you have conCpired againft your Mo'hcr-Cburch, and brethren Minifters ? 0 foolijh Galathians , who hath bewitched you* that you Jhouldnot obey the trnth3 before whofeeyes Jefus Chriji hath been evidently fet forth) crucified amon^fiyou, even in your Bap* Gal.3.1. tifm, fas the word and other Sacrament) wherein you were fprinklcd with the blood ofChnft, unto the wafting away of fin, being alfo crucified in the old man w*>th him , and buried with him by Baptifm, that the body of fin might be deftroyed, that thenceforth yc (hould not fcrvc fin ? I meiva'le that you are fo foon removed away from you; Baptifm, and your calling into ihcGr^cc of Chrift\and his Covenant of Grace, untoanot ther Baptifm j which is not another , but there be fomc that trouble you, and would pervert the Baptifm of Chrift: But Qaj f $ though they or an Angell from Heaven preach any other Bap- tifm unto yon, then that which we have preached and reached unto you, let hi m be accurfed ; and a? 1 faid b-fore, fo fay I now again, if any man preach or reach any other Baptifm unto you, than thatyc have received ofue, let him be accurfed ; or let him (hew where ever the Lord Bi Ifd for ever, at any time blefled or confecrated, inftituced, or appointed a Baptifm of Baptized ones, Parents or Children, or any other Baptifm, then once of Believing Parents and their Children once. 'they fay, if a man put away hii wife, and (he go from him, and become another mansy fhallhe return again to her ? fhall not that Land he greatly polUitdf But thou haft played the Harlot with many Baptifms , and many Dippers,>ef return again to r>e faith the Lord . 1 fay return again to the Lord, and to the Lord? Bap- Ter.2.i. tifm, if thou haft put it jaway from thee and renounced ir, if . + Ooo ihou 1 06 Infdnt-Baptifm dftore btmfe of comfort in all troubles. thou begone from him, and with the ftranpe woman, baftfor- fakgn the guide of thy youth ( yea Child- hood ) and forgotten the T'rov.2 17. Covenant of thy Gcd^md the Seal trureo;,& art become another m my, and bcuken thy felf to anoi her Bapcifm, ( for wh ich the Land is alfo defiled as thy felt) I fay, return a^ain to the Lord, ani his and thy firft Bjptifm. The Lord look upon thec, and reme out and weep bitterly tor the fame. Remem- ber therefore from whence thm art fallen, and repent t and do thy Rev,2.$. firji works, and leave not thy firft Love j hold fait thit which thou haft already, ( even thy firft Biptifm ) till Chrift come, 1 fay. Repent, and be ftill as you were in your Infancy, baptiz d every one of yru, intheNimeof Jefus Chrift , and you (hill have the Rcaiiffion of your fin?, (even of this fin, of being Bap- tized agiin, if fo you have committed it. ) For the promife is mad; to you and to your Children ; 8c with many other words 1 would have tcftified and exhorted you, faying, fave yourfrlf from this untoward Generation. But that I haften ; and will tell you onely, ( for your fwecc comfort,) w hat foe ver other tell you to the contrary, Look often back to your firft Baptifm in your Infancy , and think not upon any other Baptifm afecr- wardOas to a Store -houfe of com fort in all time ory ur need : if you be tempted by the devill , and a (faulted about your fins, in your youth, or old age, think not now of any ntw or fecond Baptifm, but recall thy firft and old Bipifm, oppofe it af ainft him, fay and know, that therein God hath promifedand fea- led unto thec the pardon of thy fins, and the purchafe of cvcrla- fting life by Chrift* If thou beeft troubled with doubtings , and weaknefs of Faith, Fetch from thy firft Baptifm, fucha ftrcngthening con- sideration and meditation ( for the doing of which, to intro- duce another Baptifm, is but a Fetch) that God hath given thee there, en earncft and pledge of his loving kindness to thee, in the water fprinklcd upon thee , representing the blood of Chrift appl) e J to thee, and fo ( as when Tbttnas fa w the Holes in Chrifts- fid's and the print of the Bailee, he lengthened his Faith fyptjfi is efetfuaUgawfl a& Hall fins for the whole life to come, r o 7 Faith aga'usft doubting.^) be net thou faithlcfs, but faithfuil, when thou rtflcftcft upon thy Baptifm , znd remembreft the pouring out of the blood of Chriil lor thec , and the earned thereof, the pouring out of water upon ihee. Ifthu Heft under any kind of Crpffc or Calamity whatfo- cver,tuve rccourfctothy Biptifm,in which God hath promifed to be thy God, of which promife he will not fail thee, nor canft thou be mifcrablc, having this promife, yea if God be with thec, who (hall be againft thee 1 Thou doeft often look upon the will* and Teftaments of thy Father and Grandfather, when you are in a doubt of your E- fhte, or in fomc trouble about ir, or in want, to be rcfolvcd in all matter* thereabout ; do the fame here , look often back to thy Biptif n, wherein the will of thy heavenly Father (which is this, I will be thy God) is delivered and fealcd, and thou wilt be well refolved, comforted and cltcrcd, in all Effaces and Condi* tions. Qnely look back alfo to, and remember as often, the obliga- tion of Homage, and ftipulation of obedience wherewith thou haft bound thy fclf to God,(by thy fuerties,or prefcnters of thec to Baptifm; )now thou knoweft and undcrftandeft it,thou muft ftandtoit, and make it good , thy part of the Indentures, per- form the Order of Baptifm on thy fide , which is to turn to God, and believe in Ghr'tft, and be continually renewing of thy Faith and repentance: and then there (hall be no need of any fecond Baptifm, or warning in water,having the benefit and effi- cacy of, and from the fame Bjptifmat firft. For this alfo I will tell thee for thy farther comfort, that the be* ntfit and efficacy of Baptifm extendeth it fclf to all aftualfins (like as origfra')Sc to the whole courfc of the life of man when* focver he fhill believe and repent, and is not to be retrained to the time of the Birth and Infancy, Sc fo after the administration of it, Bjptifm hath the fame force, it hath before, or in the time of its adminiftring : for Baptifm ii of force, fo long as the Co* venant is of force, and that is everlafting, Ejay 54. 10. Hof. 2. 1 9. The Papifts indeed will tell you , as I have mentioned al- ready, that your Baptifm will fervc you only for Rcmiflion of fins, done before it, meaning your original! fin, and fo call your B jptifm the firft Tabic for Refuge as from it ; and for fins done O o o 2 after 1 08 ifjoyned with application of C hrift, and reformation of life* after Baptifm , youniufthavc their Sacrament or Pennanceor R per.rancf, which they call, a fecond Jsblcior Rduge ; f like as the Anabaptifts tcll]you, you muft have thtir Sacrament of Cc nfeftion, as I may call thjir frcond B iptifm > which they Mi- niikr uponConftflion of Faith,) Bur I tell you both, arc need- lcfsand fupctfluou', forycur one, tirfr, finite Baptifm fupply- cth all, (you nerd no New S icrament* tor the matter) as whofe force and efficacy ( though the rite and Ceremony were gone in an inftdnt) doth txrend it felf,to your whole life time ai.d to all fins to be a (eal unto you of the Rcirrffion of a*!, original and actual, pait and to come, fo you will ftiil have recourfc unto it, and make application of the grace thereof offered and fealcd to you on Gods part. For I do not mean , nor mud you think, that the bare and empty Review or Remembrance of your Baptifm, that Hich an outward Aft was done will be unto you, at all time?, a R mif- fion of your fins, butitmuft be an effectual application^ the blood of Chrift, which is the virtue and power of it, that will do it ; and this may be and is done,in the confLffioh of your fins, and the profeffion of your faith ; I may rather fpeak more pro- perly, (than they do) and fay that your Baptifm is not fo only the firft Table for Refuge after Shipwrack, and Repentance the fecond ; but that Baptifm is the fiift and one long drawing Ta- ble 3 that may and muft be drawn out at length into the Two Leaves of it, namely into and unto Repentance of fin, and con« fcflion of Faith : at or upon which, rightly ufed and applyed, you and all true believers, and penitent finners may fit down, and find plenty and provifion of grace and mercy, or which, not fo much as a Table or P!ank>but as the Ark and Ship it felf, will fave you ; as Saint Peter faith. So then, let the cfTcfts and fruits of your firft B ptifm be acted and cxercifed by you , aad let the force and efficacy thereof be feen in the reformation of your whole life : ( toi B ptifm is a feal of a dying to fin, and a rifing unto Nc wnefs of LifCjRom. 6. 44 as well as a Seal of the Remiffionof fin, AJarl{. 1. 4 ) and then you ftnll need no fecond Baptifm jard if not9 your firft will be fruftrated, (and yet you can have no fecond •, ) and I may fay unto you Chriftians, ye ftiffnecked, and urbaptiztd in beaf* and cares, at.Stepben doth the Jcwcs, yejhffnecbgd and un- chcumafed) If joy tied with Repentance and Faith. \ 09 circumcifed m heart & tar^whcn as you do not cxprcfs the force and vcitue of your firft Baptifm, ( as they did not of their firft Cii cumcition) in the renovation and reformation of your hearts and earcs, /'. t. life and acVtons. Therefore, when the Jews fell away from God, at any time, and were called to Contcflionof fin or profeflisn ot Faith, the Prophets did not propound unto them a new or fecond Circumcifion( as if the former were voy- ded or vacated J but. onely mind them of their firft and onely Circumcifion, and ihir Obligation, in their Infancy, bidding them to Circumcife the fore- skin of their hearts , and to pra- ctice the inward Circumcifion, in converfion to God, the fpirit tuai and inward pare of that Sacramem. And Co the ApoftlcS ufed to call them that had finned after Baptifm, as the Galalbi- ans by name, who had fallen from the Grace of the Gofpcl, to confeflion of fin and repentance to believe in Chrift, telling them of their Baptifm into Chrift, & Co bringing and reducing them to that forctaken by then), and the order fct down there, which is already mentioned, nor do we read cither in Prophet or Apoftle of any other new order, required afterwards, of the Baptizing them again , but only a renewing of their Faith and Repentance, the Order and Obligation of their firft and once Baptifm, by the Miniftry of the word,and that Other Sacrament^ the Sapper of the Lord. In a word , learn now to praftice thy Baptifm , the inward part of it , to which appertains Repentance and Faith ; and fo look not only back to it, but into ir, and find out there thy in- gagement and reftipulation, and perform that now, that thou art come to knowledge thereof, and walk before God, in true obedience, and in good refiftancc ; and abrenuntiation of the Dcvill and all his works : For I would not fuch a looking back to thy Rjptifin, as may put a vain confidence in the cutward clement received by ihce, fuch a Refpcft or Contemplation of Baptifm, as to truft in the Elements , is a mifapplication of ir, throjgh corruption, and may well indeed , occafion fin, and encourage thee to a certain libcrtinifm, & iicentioufneft in life} there are fbmc who being reproved for their fwearing,drunken- neO, and whordora take Sanftuary at their Baptifm, as if it allured men wilfully trading in (in, of th: remifllon of ir. with-^ out Repentance, and Faith j but reft ioaho.i in thco itward Let- 1 1 0 Ifjoynsd with application of Chrift & reform at onof life. Letter or Element ot the water 5 butitudy tl>e Split, and walk in the Holinefs ef the fame Repent ot every breach ot Co- venant, and th'n Repentance will be, a? a lecend plank or boird* after fuch Shipwrack, to carry thee to the Haven or Happ'mcfr, like as thy Baptifm was a firft ftcp and ftair of thy entrance into the vifiblc Church, and fct th:e, as it were, a Shipboard, or in* to the Ark filing Chrift with h;* benefits unto thee, which (hall not be pulled off and made N: ill, and therefore need not to be iterated, and fit to again, the fit ft being ftill of force and ef- ficacy, to all true believers in Chrift, and repemcrsoi fin. Thus I have fhewed ycu ( Sir ) how mo ft men , yea all men who have been Baptized in their infancy, may, and ought to look upon themfelve?) as Bapriz d in their Infancy ( which you fecm to condemn,) and that to vciy £ocd purpote and benefit ; and whereas you adde, as the other [part cf your condemning them, for their not looking afti r the Command of Chrift to be baptized when they be!ieve,wiil you have them look after that, i 8 not to be fetn or found 5 nay have you fcen or found out fuch a Cornm andemem? I pray Sir lend, or fell us fome of your eye- falvc to annoint our eye?, for by and from that cye-falvc in the 3. of Rev. 18. (wherewith we have anointed our eyes, accor* ding to Chrifts Council there given) we cannot fee from the one end of the NcwTeftament to the other, any fuch Com- mandement for perfons baptized in their Infancy, to be bapti- sed when they believe. And yet as if you had revealed .'nd brought to light fome rare matter of Salvation, you have a very fc rr u* and devout epilogue, that it &your coniiderations,^«/^^ considered without a felfiijb prejudicial Spirit,a Spirit willing to be guided by the Spi. ritof the Lord according to his word of truth , and the Scriptures truly red and interpreted by tie Spirit of the LordyWbich are quoted to prove the Affections t Tt voill appear to every honefl and unbyaffed Spirit that Infant- Baptifm h a great and dangerous err our for ever to be rejeded of every Soul that expeQs Salvation by Chrift J e fits ; What a Cackling is here made upon the laying of an addle egge, or rather what a Crowing is here, upon the Treading out, of a few idle confilcrations^ you have the faculty of entitling upon theSpirir, and the Scriptures that which they being the Spirit and Scriptures of Truth, own not, your considerations, and in- ter- Infant- Bapt.provea (from from thefirji Converts Bapt. A&s 2. 1 1 j tcrprctations, ( though vcryfcldom you give interpretations Q them you leave for mc to make) quotatious, and confiderati. ons enough you bring , and rhofe co no purpofe or proof, as I have particularly demonftratcd, where you cite them, I leave it tothcHoneft and unbyafled Spirits, to jtdge and determine, whether the Texts you havccited,wcre pertinent to your Conii- deration, or according to your rm aning,or intcrpretingCif you have given any :) whether Infant Biptifm be a great and dan- gerous crrour, for cv^r to be rej &cd , becaufe now oppofed of you, whichever was, a good and R figious Truth, evcrpra* difed amongft the Saintr, becaufe recommended of Chrift and the Apoftks ; whether yours or mine be a fclfi(h and prejudicial! Spirit(I confefs, ny Spirit is prejudiciall to yours, & your opi- nions, as your Spirit is pre; udicate to mine, and thoughts. Li il- ly whether your confederations, be not as inconsiderate in the writer, (b inconfidcrable to the Reader. However you think To well of them, that you go on,to more of them, ( when its time to have done with fuch fclfifh things) and in the next place, offer co me, fome of your consideration's upon A Si. 2.39. The which if I thought, they were no more confid:rate, nor contidcrable, than your former, I would conddcr a while upon ir, whether or no I mould take them into consideration at all, or pafs by them, as inconfiderablc. And fuch indeed they feem to be , and upon the General view, I find them fo : for in them all , there arc nothing but an- fwers and folutions made to objections not (et down j Refuta- tions and denyals, of a flnfe before it be any where mentioned; is not this Care before the Horfe , which a Carter ( m-thinks fhonld not do : )& a consideration, without conlideration,wch a Confideratour (I am Cire, ) would net do \ we had before » your judgement fcclcd out of Quaeres ; this is as bad, your an- fwer* to no objc£tion9,& your rcfuting,noExpofition of ours. Well, as all the way hitherto, I have ordered your matters for you, fo (" I fecj Irouft do fo ftill, or elfcwe (bill make no work of it, at lcaft, have no orderly proceeding in it. Firft therefore , let the fenfc of that Text be given , and the argument drawn out of it for Infant Bapdfm ( which I will do for you ; ) and then after, let the refutation of that fenfe , and the 1 1 2 Inf. Bap. proved from thefirfi Converts Bapt.h&s 2. the Anfwcrs to that Argument bi added or fubjoyncd j the which you (hall do for me. Peter having preached here unto the Jews, and laid to their charge the death and crucifying of Jefus Chrift, and brought them to fome apprehenfion of their horrid fins, at rhe 38 Vcrfc exhortcth them to repent and be baptized into the Name of the fame Jcfus Chrift , and to accept him for their Meflias ; the which he doth upon this rcafon and ground, mentioned in the 39 Verf.and drawn from the benefit that fhould redound not to themfelves onely, but to their Children, by their believing in Chrift. The which he proves from the Promifc made to them and their Children. In plainer and larger word?, thus it is. God hath remembred his Covenant, in fending that bUffcd Seed, in whomhepromifed to be 1 he God of Abraham^ and his Seed ; know ye therefore, that (as God made the Promifc of Grace in Chrift (to come and to be exhibited) unto Abra- ham upon his believing, and took alfo his Children and Poftc- rity into Covenant with him, not oncly the natural Jews, but even amongft all Nations whoever became follower* of Abra- ham\ Faith, (hould by venue of the fame inherit /brahavfi Promife, That he would be their God, and the God cf their Seed alfo, which fboutd alfo be taken into the fame Covenant) fo now this ble fled Seed in wi om the Promifc waj founded, be» ihg now come and exhibited, would mike it good to you all, Jews and Gentile?, who would believe in him ; and (notwith- standing your cruel pracYsf.* againft him, and your crucifying of him) if you will believe in this Lord of life, and your M(fliasy you dull thereby be in as good, or better condition, under this laft Adminiftration , for your felves and your chil- dren, as in the former j therefore deprive noc your felves by your impenitency and infidelity, of fo great a benefit, as may come to your (elves and Poftcrity; for the Promife is made to you and your Children, &<*. Whai Promifc, or the Promifc of what * for fo I will clear the Text of fome exceptions \ the Promife of the extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghoft ? fo fay fome of you, that you may the better turn this off from In- fants of Believers baptized. It is true, they are promifed alfo in the Vcrfc before, and I acknowledge, they were Appendants to Infant- Baft, proved from thefirfl Converts Bapt. Aftss. 113 to th= Primitive Baptifrms of the adult, and peculiar to the firft times, for the more abundant confirmation of their Faith, as Ad.i id 8c 1 1 . who were converted to it from Paganifm and Judaifm. But ( no doubt) Peter here aimed, and even pointed at chat grand and fundamental Covenant of Grace made to A- braham , In thy Seed jhull all families of the Earth be bleffed, S ich a Promife as this, of Grace, and the free remiflion of their fins, by that blood oc Chrift (though (bed by fome of them) fraled in the Sacrament of B iptifm, comes feafonably to them, to pacific their troubled confeiences, and cheer up their droop- ing fpirm i whereas ih; other Promife , of receiving the Gifts of the Spirit, that is, the extraordinary ones of fpeaking di» versLsHguage?, &c. would nothing fo properly and effectually have done it, as that was the thing then in hand to be done. Andbefides, the Promife hrrefpoken of, being a Gofpel- Pro- mife, was to extend to all alfo that were afar off, as many as the Lord mall call ; ardfo it did pafs on in the general Tenders, Privileges and Efifr&8,to the Believers of the Gentiles and their children, from that time, and fo fhall unto the end of the World.But you will not fay(I dare fayj That according to this Promife, the believers of the Gentiles and their Children have received, and fhall receive, thofe Gifts of fpeaking divers and ftrange Languages, throughout all Ages and Generations. Such a Promife was never made, and ought not to be challenged of God. But (it may be) the Promife made to Abraham was but a p?rfonal and peculiar one, to him and his feed, to be taken In* to Covenant, and to become a vifiblc Church ( 1 will be thy God, and the God of thy feed) i.e. Jfaac, Jaceb^ and thar children. No, it extended, we fee, to the Profelytesof other Nations alfo, aDd to all followers of Abrahatnt faith , both Jews and Gentiles i and therefor* the fame Promife was fre* quently renewed in Scripture, Kitty hundred years after rhofe Patriarchs deccafed, both to Jews ana Gentiles, as Ifa. gr\ 6. lfa. 44. 2,3* and fe (h il\ continue unro the end of the World, I/i.59.21. to as many as the Lord ou> God fhall call, until he very laft calling in of the Jews 5 it being , as I faid , a Gofpel- Promifc. Yea, fay you, it is granted, when any of the Children of P p p Believers 1 14 Infant- Baft, frcvedjrcm the fit ji Converts Bap, A&S 2. Believers come to be called, and do believe, this Promife (hall be made good to them. Bat thus faying, you make the Promife to hold forth no more comfort or benefit to the children of Be- liever?, than the children of Pagans; and thus even Ifaac and Jacob mould have no execrna! privilege by this Promife, until they aftually believed ; yea thus all the Jews (but fuchas were £lcc\, and truly faithfullj were cut off, as well as the Gentiles, from having any vifible communion in external privileges there* of. TheCall here is cither inward or outward ; if inward, can none partake of the outward privileges, asBaprifm, but fuchas have that? We know thofe are common to the Eleft and Re- probate. If of an outward Call, why the Infants of Believers enjoy this Call with thdr Parents, and fo partake of the Pro» mife. And what if Peter here required repentance of fuch as were in Covenant before baptifra , arc therefore Infante not to be baptized ? fo Abraham was in Covenant, and an a&ual Belie* ver, and juftified in Uncircumcifion, and received Circumcifi . on as a feal of righteoufnefe of Faith ; and Profelytes turned to the Jews, were firft to make profeffion of faith ; were therefore none but fuch to Ije circumcifed ? But if being under the Covenant be fufficient, to give a pro- per right to the feals of it, and the privileges of it, (as 1 fnd) why doth Feter keep fuch a do with thefc Jews, being already in Covenant, to repent and believe before they were baptifed r and why were none of them being in Covenant, baptized, but fuch as gladly received the Word and believed £ It is no where fo faid, that none but fuch were bapt'Z.'d amongft the three thoufand fouls. And as for the Jews, who receiving the Word gladly, were baptifed, you muft know, they were not now be- fore it in Covenant, fo as to acknowledge Jcfus Chrift the Son of Mary, to be the Mefiias and Saviour of the World, as who denied that holy One, and killed the Prince of life. True,they were born Jews, under the Covenant, in the firft Miniftration of it, and were circumcifed, and had the feal of their faith in Chrift to come. But this being now antiquated and out of date by the coming of Chrift in theflem, and thefe Jews having re- nounced Chrift , and depofed themfelves and their children from the Title they had to Chrift, as Matthew 27. 25. they fo renounced. Infant-B approved from thefirft Converts A&s 3. 115 renounced the Covenant they had Title to by birth , and were now iq a condition little better than Pagans , Chriftians to be made 5 and therefore they were not to have the new appointed fcals of entrance, which was Baptifm, to aflurc them that Jc- fus was Lord and Chrift , until they embraced him by faith, confefling that he Was come, and that Jefus was he, and repent- ed "of their crucifying him. And thus having cleared the interpretation of the Text , 1 will give you a Consideration of mine upon it, before 1 come to your Confidcrations, without any interpretation given of you. My Confederation upon it is this, That here is a good war- rant for me, and for Infant Baptifm, againft you ; and fo as So- lomon faid of Adonijab> That he had Jpoken a word againjl bin Kings 2. 33 own life : I may fay, you have brought in this Word and Text again rt your felf, and the life of your Caufe ; faid I a warrant ? yea a very Command. The words, B: baptized every one of you, you will not de- ny (1 fuppofe) to be a word of command from Peter in Chrifts ftcad, and fo from Chrift by Peter. But the Command is, To baptize Father and Child) I prove thus ■■> Becaufe the Promife is to the Father and Child. The Promife is made to you and your Children, and therefore the Command is, Be baptized every one of you, and your Children. For if the Children of Belie- vers have a right to be biptized by the word of Promife, they muft have a right to bz baptized by the word of Command, and fo the other way alfo, thefc two being convertible Terms, the word of Promife, and the word of Command, having mutual relation each to other. So its in the general nature of Cove- nants, there mud be a convertibility betwixt the two parts that do contract, as the mutual Indentures (hew, and fo alfo it muft be in the Sacramental Covenant betwixt God and man, and be- twixt the word of Promife, which is Gods part, and the word of Coonnnd, that contains the duty of man, in the Sacra- mental Action. And fo particularly ic was in Circumcifion, in which Inftitution there was a mutual neer relation and conver- tibility between the word of Promife ( I will be thy God} and the God of thy feed} and the word of Command QEveryman- child among you fhall be circmncifed ) fo that as many of them Ppp 2 that 1 1 6 Infant-Bapttfm ajiore ksufe of comfort in all troubles. that had a right to be rircur);chcd oy ;r>e wmd oi Piom.itc, had a right to be circumcifld by the word ot Command j and fo alio the other way, turn it, snd its as cue* Sir, my hand is now in, and I will give you another Syllo- gifm. Whofoever are cxpreffLd in r,Ho Promifr, Verfc 39 arc con- tained in the Precept before, Verfe$8. B: baptiz.d every one of you. But believing Parents and their Children are cxprcflTd in the Promife, Verfc 39. The Promifc is i»adc to you and your Children. Therefore believing Parents and their Children are contai- ned in the Precept j and fo both arc commanded to be bap- tized. There i* no difficulty but in the firft Propofition ; and in it there is none, by reaton of the mutual re^arion, and reciprocal Convertibility that is betwixt a Promife and a Prec pt in Co- vountal , and Sacramental mstiers, a* baih bftn (hewed. And whereas it may be faid. That a Promife may be without a feal, and this here doth not infer B iptifm. Ic is true ; but when men have once put their feal, then th re needs multbcacor- refpondence and relation between that Se?.l and the Covenant. So here, though it was not abfohitelynrcrffiry , the word of Promife, or Covenant of Grace, fh u'd b fct forth by our- ward featfj appearing to the fenf:* ; yes God having once ap- pointed th:m to figmfie the inward grace, it is now neccflary thciefhould befuch a mutual relation between the woid of PiOmife and the, word of Command, and the Seal al fo. But 1 come now to your Coniidtration, upon the Text of A&t'i, vcrfe 3 9. Ccnfider, that fuch a hnn* in the Covenant, as maketh Faith void} is no true bcing't But that being in tie Covenant which is concluded from the Faith of the Barents., is fuch a beings as tnaketh Faith void, the* ■« fore no true being. cfhat this is fo , I prove. 7hii Title -whereby any per fin hath ence a being in the Covenant, by the fan»e he may remain in it for ever ; now then if <-ny one hath fuch alitle as titbeyutkhiH the Coven, nt by bang 1 he feed of the faithfully he may remain in it jer ever, andfo need: no faith Infant-Bap. proved from thefirji Converts Bapt, A&s 2. 117 of bit cwn \ and fo by the fame reafon one maj9 all may j and fee- ing all be the children of Abraham or N )ah , which were fai.h- full, all are in the Coven nor is Faith required of them as to any manifeftation of it, for their being in Covenant, or taking tWe Seal ; though thefe do require it of them afterwards : But the Proof that you bring, it being of, 1 know not what,nothing aflertcd before of you, ordenyedot me, defcrveth to bean* fwered in its kind, that is, by a Reproof $ for thus you prove. That title wherby a per/on hath once a being in the Covenant^ the fame he may remain in it for every ( I muft caft in a grain of Salt here, without which it is too frefh , yea , unfavoury : that it, {To long as he lives, and renounce not before, ) whether he be one of our Infants, or one of your grown Baptized ones 5 ) Now then if any one hath fuch a title t as to be within the Covenant^ by beingthe feed of the faithfuls he may remain in it for ever , andfo needs no Faith of his own : Here's a rope of Sand, for my grain of Salt. I grant he may with the former limitation: and he that hath fuch a Title, as to be within the Covenant, by being converted from Paganifm, may do fo too, and as one, fo all may. And he needs no Faith of his own, I hope you remember your fclf, noAftuall Faith cxpreflcd, as elf where you write ir, as to this purpofc to give him Title unto the Covenant or Seal, which his being the feed of the faithhjlldothjyet he needs Faith, to give him Title to the benefits of the Covenant, Jt frificaticn and Salvation ; and he muft be alfo, a faithful feed himfelf. And foby the fame reafon one may , allmay , and feeing all be the Chil- dren of Abraham and Noah which were faithful I, all are in the Covenant^ andfo Faith needles in the world. Sir, you rife apace, but to no preferment of a Proof : before it was but, He needs noFahhof his own, and now, it fhould but have been, they need no Faith of their own, becaufe by the fame reafon , one may, Infant-Bap. proved from thefirjl Converts Eapt. A&s 2 . 119 m y,all may as you fay: bit inftcad of fuch,you fly high and far, and fay. And fo3Faith needles in the World,becaufe aii thechii* drcnof Abraham andNojtb which were faithful, are in Cove- nant I never met with a man that made or called Faith, a Coft needle fs in the world, that is and may rather be called, that one ncedfull thing in the world : for though aftual Faith be not needful in all, to entitle them unto their external part of the Covenant andthcS^a!, as in the Biptifm of Infants of bclic« vers ( for whom it is fuhi:ient> that they arc born in and under the Covenant of grac.) yet it i^pfce^fiil for the partaking of the inward pare and ben tits of the fame, and their being in Covenant, is an obligacton unto them to believe after- wards, &c. as a pirt of their Allipulation. Now then if I mould reckon up, the Company of your, And fo, and fo, and fo,f which arc the Formals of your proofs) I (hall not need to go out into Lines or Streets, and fetch in, the Blind, and the Hilt, and the Maimed , to fill up the Room, fo long as your Reafons, Proofs, and And foes arc in pr efence, for they fupply us fully, as thus ; The Children of John and Thomas who were Loyall , are joyned in the fame Copy of Court-roll, and fo Fealty is needlcfs in the Mannor : or thus, your Plough lycth in the Field, with its Whipple- trees, and fo rain is needlefs in the County. And a man may fee, you underftand very well the Covenant God made with AW ahum and his(c?d,to be a Gof pel -Covenant of Grace, for the Remiflion of Sins, and Salvation of Soulcs itv and through Chritt promifed, who joyn thereto together, No- abindlw Covenant, without any diftinftion , or difference made, w'icreas the Covenant God made with Noah, was but a Covenant of Nature ( as I call ic for diftin&ion fake ) for the Continuation of the world, and prcfervation of the Cn a:urcf» and fruits of the Earth, to w^ich he alio annex. d as hisfign, his R nv in the Clouds, That Riin.bow : Are you of the mind of thofe, fomeot your Cut andS;z:, who when they are put to it, and pen- up by our Reafons Tor Infant Biptifm, from Infant* Ci cumcifion, ft fuch as expound, a being in the Covenant from faithful Pa. rents, overthrows the promift : it feems you are got up again, and corre to overthrotsjft^g-again :But bow do you prove, that Expofi.ionovcrthroWetT^ffic'promife. Firft, By rcalbn taken out of a Text out of HA^^J^becaufe the promife is upon the Account of Faith in our own perfons , and not in our Parenrs : And fecondly,becaufc nothing anfwercth the promife but Faith, and if Faith be needlefs, then the prcmife isneedlefs 3 and this I muft take upon your bare word without any Text. Moft of this is anfwered already, if you will read back. You bid me here compare Hahak^d^ with John 5 I pray compare your Ex- pofition, and the Promife together. The Text faith, the Promife is made toyou, and your Chil- dren, and to all a far off; ( I will be thy God, *nd the God of thy feed J where you fee, Children are Cov. riafatd j< vntly, and together with the Parents : you frame an Ev.^ fuion^^d would . put it upon us, Childrens being 'n the L ovenanr, is (rOrri faith" FulParcnts, as if feverally, and a |>aft faith ul Parents were taken into Covenant, and then horn them (heir Children fhould, becaufc born of rhem, and when born of rhem, ccmc into Covenant ; for Abraham^ btlieved u hii'ft h_* was* in uncir« cumcifion, but that Faith of his, save no being in that fpeciall Covenant, either to himftlf or children, whereof Circurrcifion was the Seal : but yet God fo well acccpred of Abrahams Faith, that for its fake, he was pleated to enter into Covenant with him, and with his children ac on: and the fame rime, and to af- ftimc them together into Covenant with himfelf: So there the childrens being in Covenant, is not from faithful Parents , Am- ply and abfolutcly, as I have (hr wed, but from faithful Parents in Covenant : or rather ( to fp:ak proprrly and fully) from the Covenant God made unto both, Parents and Children, fo that not fo much their b.tingin Covnant, as their being born in Covenant, is from their Faithful Parents inGevenant. But \hiUarejoyntly covenanted withi& togethwith their Par, 121 But neither way doth it overthrow this Promife 5 for the childrens being in Covenant, by vcrtue of the promife made, fupporteth and fuppofeth the promife ; and their being in the Covenant, from faichfui Parents, as you fpeak, doth not over- throw the promife, feeing even their being fo is, from them, by reafon of the promife made to them for their Children alfo, which rather eftablifheth and confirmcth, than ovcrthroweth and evacuatcth the promife* You had need add another Ex« pofition to your Exposition, and put better light to your New light, and into your dark Lanthom, or clfc none will fee to walk by it but your felf j andfo you have done. For it over- throweth the promife, you fay , hecaufe the promife is upon account of Faith in our own Perfons, and not in our Parents. See how you forget your felf, in forgetting the Children, of whofe being in the promife, you arcdifcouriing; you let them alone, and put your felf (and would joyn me with you, but that I will not) in their place, laying, the Promife is upon account of Faith in your own perfon, and not in your Parents. Trur, now ycu are a grown man, the promife will be, and muft be accounted to you, upon the Faith in your perfon,as to the vertuc, efficacy and effects of the promife. Now you are become a man, you muft put away Qhildijb things, as the Apoftle faith, 1 Cor. 13. 1 1. to which purpofe onely your Texts are, out of Habahfei!^ and John, whers Juftification, and everlafting life , are fct upon the account of Faith in a mans own perfon, fpeaking of fuch on e- ly, as arc grown to be tall proper men like your felf, able to ac- count, and give a reafon of them. Bur why did you (ingle out John 3. 3 5. where the word? of the Prophet H«bakk*k> are not repeated, and bauk thofc other Texts in the Margent, Rom. 1. 17. Gal. 3. 11. and Heb. 10. 38. in all w'nich the very words of (he Prophet, Ihejuft jhaliliveby bis own Faith, arc repeated and applytd ? is it to (h :w in your own perfon,that light is corns into the world,and men love darkgefs more than light ? you turned oneiv to John, for Nime Cike, out of felf-lovei ( yet I tell you, the Evangelift John, is againft the the Anabaptift/tf^tf, even herein, in that very thing for which yc ; cited him, as I have (hewed you J but if for Tr uh fake, out of love to the Truth, you would have compared Haba%uk^ with lW,inany of the three Texts, the- Mirgeni directed ycu CLsq .. to 122 Inf.Bapt not upon account of affual faith in their own perf. toj fyea, the whole Books and Epiftlcs to the Romans and Ga - latkUtt's) they would have given you a cleer Elucidation, if you would lay afide your own Spectacle?, and look with theirs that your Juftificadon, and everlafting life h there, in the Pro- phet,fet upon the account of Faith in your own perfon, apply- ing to your felf the Righteoufnefs of Jefus Chrift : which con- tain? rather the Execution of the Promik. But whats all this to the Protnif: ic felf here mcntion:d, and of old made to the believing Parent?, and their Children in . their Infancy r Sure when you were a Child , you fpake as a Child, you underflood as a Child, you thought, or rcafoned as a Child,you reckoned and accounted a? a Child : 1 pray now give mc forrrc account , ( becaufe you make an inftance in your felf, ) palling by the Faith in your Parent? , of the Faith was in your own perfon, when you wat a Chid.and went to B3ptifn?, by which you lived ; or inftance now again, in the Children of faithful Parents amongft the Jew?, what account of their Faith, did any of them make in their own perfons , when they were Circumcifcd in their Child-hood; or here in the 2. of A&sy which you have taken upon you to expound, what word,or fyl- lablc, or the Jeaft intimation is there, of any account of faith to be made of Children in their own pcrfons ? And yet the Pro mifc and Covenant is both here faid to belong to the Children, and the Children before, and fo likewifc to your felf, Sir, all the while before you could, or did give an account of Faith in your own p:rfon ; you would be loth to be accounted all that while to be without Chrift , and an alien or ftrangcr from the Covenants of Promife, having no hope, and without God in the world ; and if you fhould think or fay fo of your felf, yet I will not fo account of you, and you would be very ungrateful unto God, Covenanting, and Promising, and ungracious to your Parenis bringing you into the world, and to Baprifm, in (o thinking or faying : Ic is as deer as the light at noonday, that Ycxt r , to perfwade thofe enemies , and Crucifi:rs of Chrift to Repent, B:lievc, and fo to be Baptized, and to come under the New adminiftration of the Covenant of Chrift exhibited in the Gofpel, whom they had renounced}ufcth this as a main ar- gument, the Benefit aifo that fhould redound to their Children, tvat they fhould alfo be accepted into Covenant , and be made par- Of Faith anjwmng the Tromife, 123 partakers of the external Privileges of the Church,as co be Bap- tized and Counted God? people, iike as before they were Gin cumcifed, and fo reckoned ; which be proveih , for the Promifc is made to you and your Children, as to them and theit Chil* dren : to you indeed, upon account of your a&ual Faith in your own pcrfonr, but unto them, upon account as I have given before, of their b-ing taken of God , into the fame Covenant with you, their bc'hving Parents. But for aU this, Though Children withour account of Faith in their own perfon!>,by their Birth of be icving Parents in Co- venant and Promifc, have Right and Title to Baptifm, by ver- tueofthc Promile and Covenant made to them both, (Thy God, and thy Sced}>) yet Children , when they come to enjoy the Benefits of the Covenant in their Juftification and Salvati- on, they mud have thefe upon the account of Faith , in their cwn pTfom, or fome grace of the Spirit anfwcrablc applying Jcfu« Chrift, and his Righteoufnefc umo thent. Your other Rcafon i?, Becaufe nothing anfwereth the Promfe* but Faith, and if Faith be need/efs , then the Promife is ttcedlefs. You did well to add no Text here, having abufed enough al< ready : but let us look upward, and fee what its you prove, And that it doth overthrow the Prcmife, what hit / the Expoiiti- on of the Text, Wc7 2. 39. of Children* being in Covenant from Fai-hfull Parent.^ that it ovenhroweth thepromifei\ prove farther, becauje nothing unftvereth the promife but Faith; thus then it muft be rcafoncd ; if nothing anjtver the promifc but Faiib> thenChiU drens ki>>g in Covenant fromFaitbjull Parents^ overikroweth this promife ; 1 am fu e, This is a ncedlcfs conf quencc 5 becaufe the promifc ftands upftill, and is offo.ee, notwirhwanding though there were no Fai h in fome to uphold it ; and much more, though no< Faith in fome to anfwer it. 1 will give you a Text here, though you give me none, Rom 3. 3, and 4 What if fome did n$t believe ? fhall their unbelief make tkeFaiihof God (the Faith made and given of G jd) i.e. this p omife, without ef» fc& ? God forbid : yea, let God be true, and every man a lyar 5 Lee Gods promifc fUnd, though fome mens faith tall : yea, though none in the world had believed, yet God would have fulfilled his promife, in fending and exhibiting the Mefftas>z Chrift 5 and therefore m .chiefs is the promife over thrown > Lecaufe there Qjjq 2 may j 2 a Of Faith dnjwering the Promije. may want Faith in fomcfor fbme while,to anfwcr it.* It indeed there were no Faith at all extant or to come any where toan- Ctver the Covenant, and promife, this might feem to endanger the overthrowing of it , ae to the taking effeft and benefit in m.n '-, and then your reafon would be of fome fecroing confe- qu ncc. or your ccnfcqu^r.ce carry fome ihew of Reafcn. But it is not fo here 5 for here is Faith in the faithfull Parents (as you acknowledge) embracing and holding up the promife' 5 and here ars Children in Covenant} upholding alfo and enjoy- ing the promife, by birihof Faithiull Parents, by grace, and indulgence of God , and ( for any thing you knowj by Faith pr other influence of the Spirit: Look again into the Text of A&, 2. 39. Stcifthe promife there be not (landing faft and firm to the believing Parents and their Children, though there is no mention made of Faith to anfwer the promifes, but only called for of thofc grown men that were to be, and were Con- verted. But which way do you mean, Faith anfwereth the Promife ? for one thing may be faid to anfwer another, many wayes, as the Antitype doth the Type , the thing Signified the Sign, a thing regulated the Rule, the confederation a bargain , performance a contract, or a Condition a Covenant. 1 fuppofc it is this Ia» ter way, that Faith anfwereth the Promife 5 For as the old Co- venant with Adam flood all in Prcccps, Do this & Live, and fo works as the Condition were to anfwer that Preccpt;fo the new Covenant flood all in Promifer, I will be thy God, if thou wilt truft to mc, and Faith, as the Condition, is to anfwer the pro- mife, elfe no proportion or agreement betwixt them. For nothing but Faith it it, that anfwers the promife,it being impoffiblc to have made the Sons of men partakers of the Co- venanr,that other way, by obedience to the Law ; if it Could, it (hculd have been done that way : Adam ( though made perfect- ly Righteous, and able ) did not anfwer it ; and if God had tryed Adam the fecond time,he would not have anfwcred,in o- bedience to it 5 but would have broken it again, and fo mould we;ThercfoFe it muftneeds be by Faith embracing the promifes and fo amfwering them, that the Covenant of Grace muft be madefure unto us9 which otherwifc could never have been done. But Of Faith anfaering the Fromife. 125 B it all this maketh nothing againft the cxpofition of the Text above of Infants being in Covenant with their faithful! Parents and included f yea they are expreffed ) in the promifc ; for God looked upon the Fakh of Abraham^ when he cntred into Covenant with him and his Children, and made the pro- mifc to be the God of him and his feed ; and hereupon himfclf was Circumcifed and his feed : And where God plcaleth, and when he. pleafcth,as he doth give fanc\ky,8cthe Spirit,and other Graces to Infants, as to the Innocents, Jeremy , Szjohn the Bap, fo the habit of Faith infufed, (it being the Condition on mans part, yet wrought in every Eleft Infant by God,) whereby they anfwer the promifc, as to the good and benefit of the Covenant, if they dye before, or foon after the Sealing thereof by Bap- tifm, befides that Infants being born of Parents in Covenanr, and themfclvcs alfo in Covenant with God, and Oihers, as fure. tics and fponfors, in the name of the Infants anfwering for their Faith, and promifing for their education in the Faith, and the Churches charitable opinion, or judging them to have Faith, arc fufficienfi to anfwer the promifc, as for the outward vifiblc fcal which is Baptifm, to be conferred upon them. But you make an anfwer to an objection, which will make alfo an anfwer to the promife ; If any willfay, (fay you ) that the Parents may believe for their Children^ andfo their Faith will anfwer the promife, I anfwer; 1. that the Tiext doth tm fay, the promife is made to you, in the behalf of your Children, but to you, and to your Children; and therefore you muji believe for your felves, and they for themfelves, or elfe neither you± nor they do anfwer the promifc Somewhat of this before. Sir, whileft you are about this promifc, I m(k you would ob- ferre the precept, of ufing no vain repetitions, as here you do, fo that 1 mutt either wholly omit, or repeat vainly with you. I* Though the Text faith not fo much in fo many words, yet it meaaeth fo much ; The Promifc is made to you, in the behalf of your Children ( alfo) that word added,it is the fame with, the fromife is made to you and your Children, bothto[e< ther and joyntly, the one being in promife as wel 1 and as foon as the other; and thus the Text neither faith , or denyethyo- r objcftion» nor your anfwer. For the promifc m iy be truly m3d , i?6 of Faith anjweringthe Promife. and is to believing Parents and their Children, whether the Pa- rents do believe for their Children alfo, or the Children for themfclvet. 2. Whereas you fay, Parents muft believe for themfelv«,and children for themiclves, or neither anfwer the promifc it is truly meant according to the inward and fpiritual part thereof, fo as to partake of Rcmifiion of fin, Juttifjcaricn and Salvation : But yet the Faith of Parent? in Covenant may be, and is fofar beneficial to their born Children, that thereby they arc decla- red to be alfo in Covenant with themfelver, and to have a Right and Title unto the Seal of the Promife, and the exter- nal Ordinances, and outward Privileges ot the Church, and in refpeft of thefe may be faid to anfwer the promife. For the promife h% the whole Covenant and the difpenfationsof it in outward Ordinances, as well as Giving Graces; and its your conftant errour and miftake , never to fpeak diftin&ly of this promife, but ufually, and onely flxi&ly of the faving Graces thereof, belonging to the Elc ft, whereas there is an anfwering of this promifc alfo, by vifiblc profeflion, and external Church* memberuYip and privileges, which is done both by the Parents and Children, whether the inward Graces thereof be known or not. Concerning Infant* Faith, and their inward Graces, whereby you will have them alfo, and they may be anfwer able to the in- ward promift, I refer yoato what I have faid be for?. 3. You Sir muft own the Child above, and it muft be laid at your doors. Im*an the objection there made, That Parents may believe for their Children-, and fo anjwirxke Promife. 1 do not believe you can find out a Father for it, nor did I ever rcadc the words , as I remember, it is tme,as I Kavc related be* fore, thar Parents did anfwer for the Faith of their. Children prefented to Biptifm, when the Child was a«ked, deft .hou be- lieve, the Parent, in the Name and place of his Child, anfwe- red, I believe ; but this is far off from your Parents believing for their Children, for itwasoncly Parents profcfllng of their Children* Faith'; or the ChiJdrens profcfllng their Faith by or in the moiKh of their Parents, as I have largely fh wed. ' And as for thofe Divines, who, thoogb conteftim; for Infant* Bjptifm, Ucaufc they could not be perfwaded of Infants- Faith, made Faith of Parents, how beneficial to children, 127 mide their refuge to Parents-Faith, yet they did ic not in fuch words, as Parents believing tor their Children, nor to fuch pur- pofc, that their Faith might anfwer the piomifc, buttofhew, that the Parents Faith gave unto their Children a proof of be- ing born under theChriftian Covenant , and a Plea for the Seal of Baptifm, notwithstanding the fuppofed privation of Faith in Children. Though therefore In fantSj as to their inward ftatc before God, of Juftiflcaticn and Salvation, arc not relieved and hel- ped forward eiLher by profeffnn of Sponforsand Parents, or by the afts and habits of their Faith, becaufe as I faid, the juft ihall live by his Faith , and as you fay , the Parents muft believe for thcrafclves ; and as the Errors and Hcrcfics of the Parents do not hurl the Children, no more do their Faith and Truth help them, as giving nothing from themfclves unto their inward and eternal condition. Yet arc they beneficial to their Chil- dren other wayes. 1 . Its from their Faith, that the Children arc brought out to Chrift, and offered and dedicated to him in Biptifm, whereas the Infidels offered their Sons andDaughters pfal. 205.37. unto Devils. 2. And as in their dedication, fo by their fuppli- cationi the Faith of the Parent is helpful, towards the obtaining of their Childrens regeneration, and many graces of the Spirit, God being ready to hear, and do accordingly. 3. If original fin did hurt Infants, which without any fault of theirs, they drew according to the flefh from their Parenrs , why may not the Faith of the Parents profit the Children Co, as that fin be not imputed to then!, for Chrift* fake, to whom they arc offer- ed and dedicated purpofclyand willingly, by their Parents, fee* ing grace is njew abundant than Condemnation, and the gift greater than the fault ? 4 It is from th: Faith of the Parents Rom.$.' in Covenant with God, that their Children born of them, arc 1 Ccr.7.14, not unclean bac Holy, and if the B.oot bcHJy, fo are the Bran- Rom- n-i**- ches. So a-fo for th* obtaining of Temporal bicflhf*-, upon their Children, the Faith of Parents u avayubie: Ho v often is. God faid to beftow fuch, and fuch qocd Temporal things, for Abrahams and for Davids fake > J ef^s feeing their Faith, whi Mattb.9.2. broughtifiin Ijing on a bed, Healed the fick wan of the Fa /fie. So Chrift [aid unto the Centurion, Goxhy way, and as thou had be he- red 128 Of the trutli of Gods Promife and Covenant. , - ved^beit unto thee,and his fervantwas healed the fame hour that fo believed : Wili Chrift dofo much for a lick fervantj bccsufe of his Mifters Faith j who brought him, to a fick man, becaufc of his friends Fiith that brought him > and will he not do the like, or more for Children, becaufe of their Parents Faith,who bring them and off;r them to him in Baptifm ? Yes he healed the To! i a- 50! ' A*l4?}3ter ^at was grigvoufy vexe(l with * Vevill, for the Mothers "* great Faith, the woman a/'Ganaan 5 and healed a Son that was at the point of death , for the Fathers Faith, a ruler i«Capcrna* um. In a word ; one mans Faith may profit another, as the Pa- rents, the Children, towards both Temporal, Spiritual, and Eternal Salvation, by way bf intreaty and impctration, but not by way of conveyance and application : For this, the Applica. tionof Chrift and his Benefits, is not another mans work of Fa'nhj but h is every man? Faith to work it : and now, Sir,you that have thus flig' ted the Faith of Parents, a?to the good and bene fit of their Children, Goyou and learn, what this me aneth^ Believe in the Lord jefus, and thoufhalt befaved, and thy Houfe, Aft. 16.31. Andfoyoufuppofeit ware ( were') fo, that the promifesware (were) made unto the faithful^ in the behalf of their Children, and they concluded to be in the Covenant thereby : Then either God doth fe form his promife, in faving all the Children of faithful Parents according to his Covenant : or elfe he breakl his Covenant made to thofe Parents, and doih not perform it hh promife; either of which particulars , no ruan which is in his right wits will dare to affirm ; and therefore this Expeftion, that Children have any right to the Covenant by venue of the Faith of their Parents, or to any privilege of the Covenant, by vertue ofthefawe, is a fake (falfe) Expofition of the Text', and a wrefiing of if, Jefus (mh, ye do err not knowing the Scriptures , nor the power of God, Matth. 22.29. I am the God of Abraham, and of Ifaack, and of Jacob ; God is not the God of the dead, but of the living, verf. 32. I thought it it wculdcome to this at laft : that, after your Railing upon the Church of God in England, for worfe than naught, even no Church , and after your baiting the Minifters of God there, and, by your good-wil', ill- will, your querying and. tearing Gods portion of Maintenance from them, your Quarrelling Of ike tmh of Gods fromife and Covenant. 1 2g Quarrelling at their Miniff rations of the Sacraments of God, this cfpccially of Infant- Baptiim, befides abundance more of Gods inftitutions and allowanccs,that you have been Quseru- lous at, you would at lad afcend above the height of the Clouds, and fall to Queftioning of God hirnfclf, about the performing and breaking his promife, about his laving all , or not laving ail the Children or faithful Parents. Ekher of which particulars, if you had been in your right wits, you would not tuve dared (yet what is it , you will not dare, in matter of Interpretation ot Scripture , or argumenta- tion of reafon ? ) to have drawn and enforced, fo inconfe- qucntly and inconliderately, from that , though but fappofed proportion. For fuppofc it again, that the promife Wis made to the faiths ful in the behalf of the Children, and they concluded to be in Covenant thereby , yet neither of the particulars, you menti- on,) doth follow, that all their Children mufi be faved accor- ding to that Covenant, that fo God may p-rform his promife j or if not, God muft be a breaker of his promife : and feeing you have not proved the conf quence, I will prove the Iuconfe* quence of it 5 by the reafon I have touched before, the Promife and Covenant made to the faithful, in the behalf of the Chil» dren, and concluding thefe in the fame, ( I muft here ufc your words) containcth not only the inward fiving graces, and the fpiricual bentfis of the fame, fuch as are, Juftification, Regci deration, perfevcrance, and glorification freely promifed in Ghrift ; ( if fo taken only, then indeed all in Covenant muft be fivtdt or elfc God be a breaker of Covenant.) But it containcth in it alfo the oat ward admiuiftrations, in visible Ordinances and Church- Privileges, which arc many, as to be Gods people, and the Children of Gods invisible League, to have the Oracles of God, 8cc. and thus t«ken , God is no breaker of promife, if all in Covenant with him, be not faved by him 5 for God made no fuch Covenant with all faithful Pa- rent*, tofaveall their Children, but to put them under the way and means of Salvation, by taking them alfo to be the God of, and owning them for children in Covenant and appointing th:m a Seal thereof. This nny b: called (he Covenant of Ad- miniftracion, or rather that part of it which (lands in admint- Rrr ftratiors 1 5 o Of the Salvation of Inf. Bap. or not^and what to judge &C* ftrations of external Ordinances and Privileges ; the which hath belonging to it all vifiblc and external profeffor?, as alfo a vUiblcScal, which all that arc in this Covenant, oujzht there- fore to be partakers of; you (as it appeais)illow none to be un- der the Covenant of Grace, but only fuch as are inwardly be- lievers Juftifbd, SancYified, and partakers of (he faving Graces of the Covenant ; The which error and mifhk?, as I told you before, .1 tell you again, hath fedjeed you into thrfe inconfe- quent confluences, and miflead you into your Anabaprifmal Baptifmcs : tor as many are called buc few chofen, fo many arc to be reputed to belong to the Covenant of grace, and to be Covenanter?, though they have not inwardly and crFctually the Taving graces of the Covenant. B fides, I could prompt you, that the Covenant is but conditional, not abfolute. And now, for a condufion, becaufe you have made mention of fuch a thing, the Salvation of Infants, born in the prccinfts of rhc Ckurcb, 1 will leave with y@u a few Propositions to confider off. 1. Thit the Church of God dctermincth nothing pofitive- ly and pcremptori'y about the Solvation of Infants dying ei- ther with, or without Baptifm, for (he kuowcth that fecret things belong to God, and onely revealed things belong to her and her children. 2. Shejudgeth that Infants in the general, Baptized or un- baptized arc faved, that is fome, but not all ; for this fh' hath a judgement of certainty and charity both, both the charity and certainty of fuch a judgement. 3. That this and that particular Infant, baptized, brunbap- t'zedis faved, (hz huth no judgcm-nt of certainty, but only of charity, and this may havcj though there fhould be none of thofe particulars faved, 4. That inward faving grace, doth not alwaves attend the Covenant (largely and cornprehenfivcly taken,of which before) nor the Sealjbut only in Cuch as b.long to the ckcVicn of grace. Yet the Church may in charity think fo; as to particulars in Co- venant and under Sea!, ( sill the contrary appear) though (he , have n^ certain knowledge of ir. 5. Eltft Infant? Baptizcd,and dying in their Infancy, have no outward means of Salvation but their Baptifm, the Seal of the Co- Of the Salvation of Infants Bapti.and what to judge &c 131 Covenant but there is an inward invifible grace, which the Holy Spirit, before, in, ar, or by Baptifm, doth truly, really, and aftjally impute or impart to them, applying C^rift in his Juftifying,and Sanft»fying vcrtue,unto the fouls of fuch Infants. This the Church holdeth not only as of charity, but as of cer- tainty. 4. 6. Such E'cft Infants Biptizd, and fo dying, arc capable of, and do attain to fuch faving inward grace*, not by the ufual and ordinary way of Believing upon hearing a>:d conceiving (for fuch aftual Faith, is not of abfolutc nccrccfficy to all GodsE* left, but only to thofc to whom God affords the means of it. J Iris the application of Chrifts Rightcoufnds, that juftlficth them i wHkh is done to them,cither bv fomr habits of Faith m- fufed of God into their hear sj or by God S/irit in aiecret and unknown way to us, fupplying all deleft* in them, and doing all things on their parts } and this he holdeth, raoft in charity, with fomcthough not, full of certainty, becaufc it i> fecrct. 7 Such Elcft Infants Bptized,and Jiving to th life ot Rca- fon and Uidcrflanding, the feeds of Grace and Faith infufed before, or in Biptifm, do gro* np, by the ordinanry means,un- toanaft ul apprehenfion or Cbnftand hisRighteoufncfs, yea aredl p.;(Tffijn and comfortable fruiiion of Chrift and all his benefits, which were in Baptifm truly and eff ftually feaJed be* fore unto them, whenfn vrr rhev ftnu'd be capable to make ufc of them .* and this uV .ftirnuth both out of certainty , and charity. 8. Becaufc the Church ( and all this while, 1 fpeak of the Church of old England*) hath no certain knowledge of parti- cular*,who ari E' ft Intent*, and who not ; but only a charita- ble opinion of this and thai, i«nd fo every particular one, born in the bofomc of the Church; & for that (be not only charitably holdeth, but certainly knoweth, that all infants born of Chri- ftian Parens, are alfo' inexterna land pro' cflional Covenant of God, rog rher wi»h their Chriftian Parents , Therefore (he is careful), a« ftv ought, thar all fuch in convenient time and with eh : fo-ncft, may be Bapr'z'd, and receive the Initial Seal of the Co vt nan r, fo as none, a? much as may be, depart out of this life, without Bap ifm, not as if (he certainly thought In- fants, having been ttuc partak er* of Baptifm, muft needs with- R r r 2 out 1 3 2 Of tbefalvation of Inf. Bapt. or net^ and what tojudg^&c* out doubt be faved ; but becaufc ihe will not be wanting in her charity , and duty to God and fuch Infants, which being once baptized, and dying foon after, (he thinks them faved in her judgement of charity fin which fhethinkrth the'inward grace may accompany the outward Miniftration) but for any )ud^e* ment of certainty and verity herein, (he dhcJaimeth, and refer* rcth the fame to the G©d Omnifcient. Now to what end you add thefe la ft word.*, Jerus f.uth, Te do erre, not \nwing the Scriptures, nor the pow.roj God, M u. 2 2.29. lam theGcd ef Abraham, of Ifaac, and Jacob', God is not the God of the dead, but of the living, Verfe 32. unlef? it be to (hew a kinde of fatality of errour falling upon yon, and following you wherefoever you go, not knowing, but pretending ever ihe Scriptures ; which ftill y 311 cite, as heretofore, and fpeak words againft your own life ( the life of your Caufc) and cut your own throar with your own knife, or run yoar felf thorow with your own Sword, even the Sword of the Spirit, the Texts of Scripture, as you cite and apply them, as here: For by 'virtue of Abraham's faith, which God fo well accepted of, did not God enter into^ and make a Covenant , both win Abraham, and his S:cd, Ifaac and Jacob, and all other, both Jews and Gentiles, who Ihould be followers of Abraham^ faith X and God being the God, not of the dead, but of the living, Abra- bam\\vtth ftill in the children of Abraham, who are of the fame faith with him ; and fo the Covenant made with Abraham, lives ftill in all b lieving Parens, for tVmfelves and their chil- dren, In that faideli thou truly, John 4. I 8. And for yoar laft words hereabouts, Conftder thefe things witft a fingle eye, aiding at Gods glny, and thy Neighbours good ; aMdanfvcer \h~ere Conftder 4iieit$ by flu in and, direct Scriptures, tf you can ; or eije leave iff rprcjHng the Scriptures to your oven ends (if not your dejlruOion,) 1 ha v done it, you fee, confidercd your Con(iderations, (which I wifhyou had better corhdered of, that fo they mighc have been truly Confidcration?) and that not oncly with a fingle eye, as you (peak, but with a two- fold eye; folmuft, if aiming at both, Gods glory, and my Neighbours good, even your good a lfo, as well as Parents and their children ; whereas your Confederations did neither, bin- rather obfeured Gods glory in his Covenant, and diminifhing your Scrtpt.falfly expound.yet frefump,call.themittdtf the H+Gh. 133 your Neighbours good) the good of Infants efpecially , which God ruin enlarged to if>cm. And God hath enabled me (for I can do nothing of myithj to anfwer your Considerations by plain and dircft Scriprurcs,and Reafons drawn from them ; yea, and fuch Scripture?, as you have wrung, wreftcdj and wrong- ed, I have vindicated by explaining them, and directing of them to their right end and cosftru&ion. And lb. I fball not need to leave off that 1 never b:gan. But (truly) it is time for you to give over that which you have pra&ifed all along your Letter to me, the wrefting of Scriptures, and that to your own ends fif not deftru&ion 5 ) yea, 1 muft tell you, (though you may wreft the Scriptures to your Own deftruftion, unlcfs you fee your errour and repent) you do not wrcft them to your own ends* lam fare, for they do not come up, or attain, either to your own end, the dcftru&ion of our Infant-Baptifm, or to your other end (for borh thefe are your own ends) the juftifi- cation of your Adult »Baptifm of perfons before baptized. I will not be my own judge herein, but refer it to the indiffe- rent Reader ; if any (hall perufe this my Anfwer. I proceed to that which followeth of yours. An Expofition according to the miflde of the Holy Ghoji irt that Scrip'ure, I Gor.7.14* For the unbelieving husband i$' fattdified by the believing wifa and the unbelieving wife is fan&'fied by the believing husband ; elfe were yeUr children unclean ', but now* they are holly (holy) (or clean) which is oppofue to uncleannefs. What a Mountebank are you, alwaits thus to mount up your low bank, and to elevate your mean drugs of Expoii Jon, with fuch hish andtxtrcam Praifjs and Titles,; as if it w*re aceordi ing to theminde of the Holy Ghoft t h n<* this to fiund a loud trumpet before apior alms given, as the hypocrites dd, Mitth.^. 3 f Is not this one kinde of boating of things without your meafurer 2 Cor. 10. 15. and this one thing, Theminde of the Ho'y Gholt inubis and that Scripture, and peremprorily faying your Ex- poii ion to be according to the fame I thisis that the Spi/tr in- deed fpeaketh txpn.fi/, that in the latter days fo-ne ft a lib: lovers of tkemfelvei, proud} bsaflers, 2 Tim* 3 & 1 Tim. 4, and bo .1- ftcrs of the Spirit, having not the Spirit; thsfe be they whole- parate thcmfelve, as Jade teileth'you now again, rerfe 19. 0 the depth of the ricbes both of the \mwledge and wifdme of G)d9 R r r 3 for 1^4 Scrip.falfy expound. prejumpt*. called the mind of the H.G, for who hath h^town the minde oj the Lord? Rom.u.3.^ B hold ths man, who expounds according to the minde ot the Holy Ghoft, in that Scripture at kaftwiic : No Sir, you do not, you are confounded already, who prefume to be of the Council of" the moll High, and of the minde of the Holy Ghoft i fee bow you-falter and ftaggcr at the firft ftep and fetting out to your Ex- position ? ( for the meek will ke guide in judgement, and the week^ will he teach his way, Pfal.25.9. God refyteth the proud, and gi- vetb grace to the humble^ James 4. 6.) for ycu chop and change the words of the Holy Ghoft, whole own words do beft < xprefs its own minde, turning (holy-, as you mould write it, but that you arc fo holly, or hollow) into clean, as if you wc uld teach the Spirit ot God» tht words it (hould ufc ; and then (indeed) you may the fooner know the minde of the Spirit, fpcaking in your own words. Sir, are you like to expound this T\xt according to the mind of the Holy Spirit, who refute the words iof the Spiiit, by which it fignifi d it? minde ? and bring aid add another word, which cxprefscth your minde better j bt fides that in ihc citing the words of the Spirit, you twice add (Believing) believing) as if you would tc^ch the spirit to cxprcfe its minde, more fully and plainly than ot himftli he doth, putting words into his mouth, which he left out , though 1 acknowledge, the words aec twice neceffarily implied, Bk 1 would you could once teach your felf to write Engjifh, and fpeak fenfe yourfelf (fo far are you ft om < xpounding according to the minde or w rd« of the Holy Ghoft ) L'ok again 1 pon what rollow^th of yours. 7hi< Scripture is owe (one J of the wain props that Mr.Woinell build eth his Infant- Baptifm upon , grounding from hi nee , that children are hi ly, btcaufe there (unding, put it into fuch words, or drefs it in fuch clothes, that I may know ir, and you own it, for your Child, or child . ifh opinion, whether it prove a legitimate or baftard; for fo (I fee) you intend to make of the Apoftlcs holy children, only legitimates ; and of the unclean , oncly baftards. And I am farthec glad to fee you are willing to look into any of our Wri» ters and Book?, that treat of Infanc-B iptifm, as here Mc.JVynell C whofc Treatife, as I remember, I fent either to you, or to a friend to (hew you)and the rathcr,becaufc your ProvlncialAna* bapcifts ( like as the Provincial Jcfuitcs, do forbid unto their ncwC03verts,and old Gacholiq ie*, as they caU thcm,thc read ingofour ProteftancBook')arccau^ou8t^lc OJf Orthodox Tra&atc* com: not into the hands and view of their Catechu- men Profclytes. It appears to me, you have not fo much as read McWy/nell about this Text (Torarare you from reading over his B x>k) or not read fo much as he wrote about it , be- caufe you pafs by his E^pofition of it, and his Reafons, and your Anfwcrs to them, and fpend your time in drawing out of your felf and your own bowels, as a Spider , thofe Cobweb- C >n(ideration? of your own , fprcad out to catch Flyes, that will come into them. Well, fuppofc it one of Mr. WynelW main props or pillars, he hith more befidrs \ and I thought that fuch a Sawpfin as you aro, would have laid hold on both, orall the pillars of the houfc, and pu'l.d them down: but inftead of pulling down bis, you fct up fkft a prop and pillar of your own by his; and do interpret trie Apoftlcs meaning, of children bnngholy, to bconely from a Matrimonial holin:ff, as born in liwfull wed- lock 5 13 6 Mr. Wynels Opinion falfly dleadgnd. lock \ and Co to be nothing die in a manner, but a legitimation of birth: And here you cite Rem. 4 20. which fpeaks of law- fulncfs and purity 01 meats to Believers ; and Inns. 1.15. which fpeaks of faith purifying ihc heart, and all things after to the pure; and £/*i>. 13.4. which (heweth Marriage is honour able ', and the bed undefiled, all to what purpofc ? lorfooth to prove, that the tioliueL .'poken of children by the Apofilr, was me t of a legitimation or birth; and t he fanfrification there menti- oned, of a Mat" imon'al fan&ifica.ion 1 were they not ruhcr to this purpofe, to fhew that a food memory, and a got wit, have not met in your bead ; who (hew your good menu y, to cite many Texts of Scripture, but no good wit to apply ihem, or to prove that out of them, fo» which you bring them ? Next you infer it from the fcope of i he words' * For (lay you) the words are part of an Anfweare (Anfwer) to a ghtejiion pw by ike believing Corinthians, Whether that they which we e converted by the preaching oftheGofpehmigbt live with there (their) husbands or Wives, which were not converted? Now the Apv.tie anfwer s rhusy If the unbelieving husband or wife will dwelt with the be'itviug buf- band or wife, let not the believing depart from The unbelieving huj» band or wife is fanfiified to or by the unbelieving husband or wife ; elfe ware your children unclean, or unholy. But now (faith he) by your dwellingtegetber, and owning your former marriage (which was lawfull) they are holy and clean. This in (hen is the genuen (genuine) meaning of the Holy Ghojiin this Scripture. This, neither in mort, nor at length, is ihe meaning of the Holy Ghoft in this Scripture ; for according to this meaning, all the children of Heathen* and Pagan~Parcn(?, lawfully mar- ried, as they maybe, and many or then be, may be laid to be holy, and each of the Parents fanft fitd to the other, by their dwelling together, and owning thci Marriage, which was law- ful!.: Which things are nothing pertinent to rhe Corinthians Qucftion, or the Apoftles Anfu cr, and quite wide, and fardi- flant, if not wholly repugnant, to the fcope of the words and meaning of the Holy Gholt in th:8 Scripture. To let paP the non-fenfe of fomc parr of your RcIattons and the confufions thereof, as to the Q^eftion and Anfwer, and your flortning, or rather curtailing ol them, I will (ct it down to the lull, becaufe upon this dependr, as upon a prop or pillar, the 7*e unbelieving Confortfan&ified by the believing. r 57 the Frame and Fabiick of all Rcafons and Arguments. Thefc Corinthians, before they received the Go/pel, and their converfion,wcrc of the civil Heaihens and Pagans,amongft whom the men had their wive?, and wive? their husbands, joy- ned together in lawful Matrimony, according to the Cuftoras and Laws amongft them. Now when amonft thefe married couples fometimes the husband was converted toChrif}, and became a believer, the wife abiding in her unbelief, and fomci tim-s the wife was converted to Ghrift and became a believer, the husband remaining in his Idolatry, (the Spirit blowing where it lifted, and grace being free, )thc believing party began to have fomc fcruple of Confcicnce,(occafioned,itmay bc,upon their knowledge of the Law in Hc unbelieving Conjort Jan&ifiedby the believing. But wc have fought out many inventions, aud though they ro'ght be plain Cafes with w9 being thus determined aforehand long ag"» by an Apoftle, we have folded them, and perplexed them with many intricacies, aboatihe fenfesand meaning of the Canons of that Apoftle. A?, what is that fanctification, ard how the unbelieving wife is fanftified by the believing husband : and what is this holi- neff, and how the children of fuch Parents are faid to be holy and not unclean. You have already and loon (hot your bolts at both at once, srd thus give the Genuine lenfc and meaning, as yen boaft, of the Holy Ghoftin this Scripture, that the former rcfolution, A^oftolical, is to be taken of Matrimonial faniUficanor,as thu?i the unbelieving Wife is fan£ti6cd by the believing Husband, fo that they are lawfully Husband and Wife : And the latter refo- lur ion Apoftolical, ituo be taken> of Natural bolinefs (as you call it in your third Corjfideration) fo as the children of fuch Parents were not unclean but holy ; that is, not baftardsbutLe* git's mates* And now I muft skip over to that third Confederation men- tioned, to Bade out either ib*nc Text of Scripture, oribnie found of rcafon (there being none betwixt this and 'hat. yihert indeed I finde cited by you* I Theff. 4. 3, 4. Wherein thus you pro* ceed j in the 3. verfe the Apojile faith, For this is the will of God) even your fanSsfieaion ( or kolineffe : What is this fanBification or bolineffe $ it is laid doyen in the latter part of the verfe in thofe ■words , that you jbould abliamjrom Fornication 5 fo that from hence it appears, what bolineffg the Apojile meant kef ore, even- a Natu- ral holinejfe or dean tfy (cleannefs^) f tar is9 not bom of Fernica* tion 5 and the rcafon is in the 4. verfe, that every one of you fkould kpow bow to fofefe (poiTofTej his vefel(vdXc)*) in fanfiification and honour : fpeafypg of Natural helineffe and cleamtfsy of keeping their body, &c. and fo their children come tote clean and holy , elfe were they unclean and unholy, Firft, What a Rcafoner arc you, yourfclf may fee by ma- king the 4 verfe arealon of the 3. verfe, whkh is only an ex- plication of itas to the pcrfons to whom he prefcribed the du- ty of abftaining from Fornication,and to the means thereof,that CYtry one mould keep his Ycflcl or body in fanc"tificarion,&c.wch if Ihe unbelieving CenfortfanBifed by the believing. 1 39 mhe fame thing in fubliancc with the former. Secondly, You mif-namc the thing, as well as miftakc the reafon: For it is not a natural holinefc orcleanncfs, that the Apoftlc fpeakaof or for, but a conjugal,or civil, or moral one ; nor is Fornication or unclcanneG, here, any natural, but a moral,civil,or conjugal thing, or otherwifc anunconjugaljunohri!,and immoral, at all other vices and fins are. Thirdly, If this Text muft prove the former Tex-, of the Co- rinthians to be meant only of Matrimonial fau&ihcacion, 0or I hope now you will leave offyour Natural holinefs :) Why then this text. (or the Thtffalonian?, I mean) and the unckannefs and holinefs th.rc, muft be remained to Fornication and cuafU- ty : but this cannot be, becaufc other fins are named and- m en « tioned in that place befides ir,z*ttkat uo man g? bejond& defraud his brother in any mattery at the 6. vcrfc ; and then the Apoftle at the 7. verfe, gives thisas a reafon common to both and all par- ticulars, b;C3.ufe God hath not called us to uncle annefs but to boli- uefsy fo that by holinefs there 11 meant not only chaftity, but ju- fticc alio and intcgrityjand by uncleannef?,injufticc alfo & frau- dulcncy. For the will of G®dis firft gc-ncrally fetdown, an the 3. vcrfc, and fpecified in two particulars, the one of chafti- ty> along to the 6. verfe, in wheih verfe is another particular, of juftice, and at the 7 vcrfc, the reafon of both is yielded ; For God hath not called as to uncleanneft, bat holinefs ; which if underftood only of Matrimonial unclcanncfs which is Fornica- tion, and holinefs which is chaftity, then the Argument mull run thus j let no man go beyond his brother in bargaining, for God hath not called us to fornication but to chaftity, and lo you alone (hill run with it for me, and follow the confcqucnce thereof, which I hold to be of no confluence. And fourthly, Such another confequsnee is this; unclcan- ncis and holinef*, or fan&ification h put by Si.Paul todis Thtflalonians, for fornication and chsftity, (fuppofc it Coy though I grant it not Co) and therefore the fame i3 meant by St. Paul to the Corinthian',when he faith, the husband Is lan&ified by,or in,or to the wife, clfc the children were unclean, but now rhey arc holy ; as if the fane words may not bear divers fenfts, in fcveral Text of Scriptures, according to the diversity of the nutter and fcope > and how will you (hew, that chaftity among S f f 2 the 14.0 The unbelieving Confortj&nUified by the believing, the Heathens and unbeliever?, is ever called fan&ification in Scripture, the fpirit only being the Spirit of fan&ificarion, and the bodies of Heathens and unbeliever, being not the Temples of the Holy Spiricarid yet (you fee} the Heathen o'runbelieving husband or wife, is faid to be fanftitied in or by the believing wife or husband. _ And Fiftly and laftly, The Apoftle fpeaketh to the Theffalo- nians, grown perfons, converted toChrilt, and tells them for theprefent and time to come, that it is the will of God, they ChouM abftain from unclcannefs and fornication, from fraud and injuftice, (Tor the one of which you cite Heb. 13* 4. alfo, the only t xc you cite, according the fenfeof it,^ and whats all this to the unbelievers being fancYified by the believers, or their children* being holy > Here was no fuch mixt conjugal focictieg of Chriftians and Gentiles or Heathens, and children born of them, as appears in that the Apoftleg faith, Let every oneof you pofTeffe his veflel in fancYificacion, and not in the luftof Concupjfence, even as tht Gentiles, which know not God : I am fore the Apoftle neither fpeaks nor means a natural holinef6 or cleannefs, that is, not born of Fornication, as you ftrangly and inconfidcrately blurt out j which words I leave to you to put inro fome Genitive Cafe, for the birth of 1 know not whom, the fathers or children of thefeTheflaloniansj for you make no Genuine fenfe here3 either of fathers or childrcns Natu- ral holincfs or cleannefs. There is a parcel of your third Confidcration,clapt in by you, not belonging to the matter in hand there, which, according to my cuftom of right orderin?, and mcthodifing of your confufed ftuffe, I rcferve untill anon , to come in its due and proper place. I proceed, now that 1 have anfwered your Allegation for a Natural (you would fay, if you were acquainted with the beft fpaken of your Scft, Matrimonial^fanftincation, Holinefsand cleannefs : to give you my Reafons to the contrary of your Opioion. 1. When the Apoftle faith, the unbelieving husband is fan- cYified by the wife, &c. and the unbelieving wife is fanftified by the husband : this cannot be meant of Matrimonial fanttity and kohnefs, that their Marriage wai good and lawful, and chafte, The unbelieving Confortfan&ified by the believing, \^t chaftc,for both parties knew thatof thcrnfclves bcforc,nor nccdi cd they, nor did they here propound any fuch Quaere unto the Apoftlw,w i-ther they were at fifft or ftill rightly man and wife, or w<;re joyned, in lawful way of Wedlock whileft they were Heathens. And that cafe wis alfo determined before by the A- poftle, as the 9, and 10 verfes, let not the wife depart from the husband, and let not the husband put away his wif: : But the Quaere here was, whether the believing party mi^ht depart and feprrate from the unbelieving party, a Brother or a Sifter, as its more explicated at the 12, and 13. verfes 3 fothat itfecmsy this Q^serc arofc from fomething in difference of Religion, that troubled the Confcience of the believing party after his or her converfion, as whether it would not be defiled in remaining joyncd to Idolaters and Infidels : Now fuppofc the Quaere had been fent to you for anfwer (for I will fee how good you arc at answers, who arc fo much in Quaeres) what will you anfwer to thefc Corinthians r why thus you do: Be content, Sirs, you have a nacural holinefs 8c cleannefs, or your Matrimony is law fill, notwithftanding the difference in faith, you may live toge- ther for all that,you are no Adulterers and Adultcreflcs,incrcafc and multiply, your children are no baftards but Legitimates. But , Sir , do you think this would have anfwercd their Quaere, fadsfied their fcruplc, or pacifi.-d their Confcicnccc would they not have replycd to you, in the words of Job to his Friends, We have heard many futb things, miferable Comforters areye all. Job. 16. 2 1 Tell us that we know not j anfwer us to that we Quaere you ; fpeak that we have not heard j wc have heard many fuch things, we know all this, that we arc lawfully m in and wife, and our children are no Baftards but Legitimate?} if this be all ycucan fay, as good hold your peace, for yoti fpeak no peace to Con fcicncc : Miferable comforters of Con- science are ye alitor as in the margent,troublefonie comforters of confciencc are ye al!,and by this your refoIution,makc our Con- ferences more troublcfomc and miferable than before they were. Oar doubts are, whether we that are converts and believers, may pit away or go from our husbands or wives, which arc Infidels and unconverted, and alfo his or her children, as not belonging to God for part of his people, or feed, and being as a grief and vexuion, if not pollutionto us : what do you tell us of lawful- S f f 3 : ncfi 142 The wtbelkving Confort fan ftified by the believing . nefs of cur Marriages,or Legitimacy of our children ? Can yi.u mew us, there i»any fanftification, betwixt us and our unbeliev- ing conform, whereby Wc may be induced to live and dewellto* pettier * any hoiineffe, of our off-fpring and children, thac we may own them* as members ofthe Church of God ? do thi^and do i'omthing, ci'fc its nothing you fay. But I will take oflchefc Corinthiani from you, Sir, and from b.jkingofyoui ( tor Which you may thank me) and ivi'l dt- r.-ft.thfm to a more happy and peaceable Comforter, even their own AfoftleSt.P^/, who here fully anfwtreth their doubts, and quiets their Conferences* telling them, that the unbelieving husband is fancYified by or in(rheword in the Original bcaretrr all J the fcife? and the unbelieving wife is Cn&fned by or in the Fuiib-and, meaning fthough not cxprcfTdJ the believing husband and the believing wife. (I blamed1 yon Sir, before for expreffing kin the te»(wu*rc the word, believing, is not tor n eneioning it as the (enfe and (cope, which my feff noW doj for the queft ion is, what the believiug Wife or husband is to do with the unbelieving husband and wife. Now this go- eth and fpcaketh to the heart (as the Hebrews Cay) of thefe Co- rimhiws, and bringeth a calme upon their troubled fpirits,now if the unbelieving husband bepleafed to dwell with his believ- ing wife, fhc is well coutented, for the unbelieving husband is far frffcd by or in the wife : and if the unbelieving wife be con. rent to keep with her believing husband he is as well pleafcd, f ye the unbclkving wife is fanttified in and by the husband} and now alfo their children arc not unclean,but holy. This of fan* Sification, is fuch a privilege, as is not common to all married folks, but peculiar to believing perfonr, fo that thefe may reap f jch comfort and benefit hereby, that their unbelieving conforts are fancYtfied to or by thcmfclvesj and they may have not only a lawful enjoyment,but alfb a holy ufe of their unbelieving yoke* f.llows,for that God efteems the feed of fuch to be a holy feed,as truly as if both were believers. Thus the Apcftlc,his icfolution removes thatfcrupleof confcicnce, telling them, the believing husband or wife, they were* not defiled by remainirg joyncd with the unbelieving confort, but rather (hat the unbelieving confort was funftrricd in or by the believing I u bard & v ife: hi which ) our fenfe, of natural or Matrimonial charity, or fat Scl- ficadon, the unbelieving Confort fanUified by the bduv'mg. 1 43 ficaiion, (if you will have the word alfo) is nothing To fatisfa- &y the husband, let them be what they will, believers or un- believers, according to your fenfe, as b-'twixc whom there is your matrimonial Chaftity, or Iawfull Marriage. Bat then ic would not have been Co true every way (a? now it is according to my CcnCc) for to the pure all things are pure, but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving, is nothing put e, but even their minde and conscience is defiled, Titus 1.1 5. Nay more, whereas the believing Confort fanftificth the un- believing Gonfort,and not the other way, the unbelkvingCon- fort fanSificth the believing ©ne, if matrimonial Chaftity, or your natural Sanftity, Were here underftood, bjth Conform would here befan&iitd $ yea both the believing one, and alfo the unbelieving one would be, and were hereby fanft.fcd in therotelves, not by, or in, one the other , fo : Marriage is honou- rable amengjl ally and the bed undefiledj&tb. 13-4. And tb-eo you may alter the Text of Titus, and fay, to the inipuce, awdimbe- lieving husband or wife alfo, all things arc pare; they are fan- ftificd even in tbcmfelves, by their matrimonial ^iaftityfl and natural Ctiaftity, and even their mindc and conscience is un- dented. Befides, what an incongruity and; .inoonfifte ncy inhere in fuch a reddicion and interpretation , the unbelieving: wife is fan&ifiedby or in the believing husband; that is9 chaftifijd or matrimonially holy * Said I not but even now , That cfo. ftity amongft the Heathen, or fpoken of them, as herc)ou will have it, of the unbelieving, is never called San&ificition, or San* ftity, in Scripture? Turn down to your fclf the one Text, and then turn ic over to me. 1 gave you alfo reafon.ibr it, becaufe their bodies arc not the Temples of the Spirit of God, which is the Spirit of Sanftification and Sanctity. Bar, I pray, {hew me alfo, that one Confort or yoke -fellow doth chaftifie or nuke c hade the other, like as the Apoftle fh;wcth you, that one d fch fanftifie 144 lhe unbeliev ing Contort fatt&ified by the believing. fan&iric and make hoiy the oiher ; and if to be both Cot. forts be not chalk, how arc they made chafte or chafttfrd, each by, or in other; or if but one be unchafte, how in he or (he chafti- fied or made chafte, by or in the other chafte one, be it he or (he> Truly, Sir, this opinion of yours, and yoiir fenfe here, de- fences a little tobechaftifed , till it be more ftnfible, yea and chaftified too, as which doth adulterate and corrupt the purity of the Word, and the fan&ification of this Text. It may fome* thing recreate the Reader (if any come to reade thefc meets, befides your (elf, who do concreatc it) to intcrfert what a great Champion of Infant- Baptifm hath related of as great an oppofcr of it, about the interpretation of this Text ; which he holding, as you do, it tabc meant of matrimonial chaftity, and holincfs, bringcth forth as a parallel Text, the $4rVerfe of this Chapter. I pray look the Vcrfe , it h too long fori me to write out twice ; and he thusrendrcth and meancth it: The unmarriedcares for the things of God, that me may be holy in body and Spirit , /.f.That(hc mcy be chafte : but flic that is mar. ricdj cares for the things of the world, that (he may pleafc her husband. The R lator faith of it oncly this , That in troth it is a pretty odd fenfe, thus invented ; and that which I onely (halladde, is, That if thus invented, it is ("hardly) in truth; and though pretty, it is not chafte, but holy, that the Apoftle aimeth at, That (he being unmarried, and free from worldly cares, careth the more for the things of God, that (hemy be godly and holy ; and wheth-r the fenfe be even or odd, I pafi not; it is odd indeed, that the unmarried careth for the things of God, that (he may be chafte. I will make it even, and fay with the Apoftle, The unmarried careth for the things of God, how (he may be holy. If you ask me now for my fenfe and interpretation of S.Faul here to the Corinthians , faying, The unbelieving Confort is fanftified by or to the believing Confort, 1 gave it you but a little before, to be this plainly , You believing Conforts may have, and have, if you dwell together, not oncly a lawfull enjoyment, but a holy ufc of your unbelieving Confort. This I (hall elucidate, by comparing it with \Tim. 4. 5. where the creature is faidto be [an&ifitd bj the word and prayer , unto the pure lite unbelieving Confort fan&i fled by the believing. . r 4 $ pure and Believer. You may as well limit and reflrain t he San- ftirlcaticnhere, onely to a lawful! ufc of the Creatur c» to Be- lievers and unbeliever* , as ycu do the other former fan&irkati- on, ondy to ihc lawfull marriage of the unbelievers and 8f lievert : But zs 1 have (hewed ycu the cne, Co I (hall now pro*- that the ottar holdcth out more to your eyes, if yc u will open them and look on, becaufe the Heathens and unbelievers had a lawfull ufe of the Creatures $ but S.Paul here tolir,.othj> fpeaks of fuch an ufe of the Creatures, as they toad not, and is appliablc onely to Believers, and therefore is a hoi)' and fan&i- fied ufe alfo (not lawfull onely) as appears by that which foi- loweth, for it is fanftified by the Word and Prayer, they have the Word to Warrant the ufe of them , and Prayer to workc down Gods blefling upon them ; and then alfo fin the fourth verfc) Thankfgiving, to fend up glory to God for them ; all which the H:athen and unbeliever were not capable of, or able to, and this Sanftifkadon is not their lawfull ufe of the Crea- ture, but a peculiar holy ufc of them, which the Believers and Saints have- And fothis Exposition of Pauho 'timothy , makes the oiher of Paul to the Corinthians , clear and ftronger; for fomc of your Seft hold, That the San&ification of the unbeliever here in the Corinthians , is fuch a SancYification as is parallel with that there in Timothy, and therefore 1 may infer, that as the fancYification in timothy 9 is peculiar onely to Believers, and more than a lawfull ufe of the Creatures, which Heathens are alfo capable of : Co the San&ifi a; ion in the Corinthians^ is a holy ufc of the unbelieving Confort unto the Believer , and more than a lawfull or Matrimonial Chaftity, which the un< believers may and do enjoy amorgft themfelves. This that I have fct d^wn, is the fame in eff ft, with that which our latter Divines call Inftt umcntal San&;fication ; they mean, and Co would have the Ap >ftls to mean, when he faith that the unbelieving Confort is fancT: fied by or to the believing Conforr, that is fanftifi d inftrumentally, to the pr-creating of iflTic or children, which the believing Confort doth fanftifie ; and fo both together, the unbeliever fancYifkd by or in the Be- liever, do make a holy root, to produce a holy branch. For its evident, that this ian&ifying by rhc believing party here m:n« T t c tiched, 776 T£e unbelieving Conjort fanftijied by the believing. tioned, refpe&sthe ifiiie, asthe Apefiles reafen fheweth 5 elfc were your children unclean, but now they are holy. And you and your Seel: acknowledge as much, by ycur grounding and building a legitimation of ifiuc thereupon. Briefly, the Ji fidel party is fan&ified by and in the other,both for a holy Conjugal Society, and for raifingupof a holy Seed un?o God: fo it is but relatively, for abfolutcly all arc fan&ified onciy in Chrift Jefur. And fo 1 mould and would have come to the Corinthians (e- cond Scruple, or Cafe of Confcicnce, about their children; but that 1 remember a parcel or Claufe of your third and laft Con- fideration, refcrved hither, becaufc it was clapt in thtrc difor- derly and impertinently ; and it is this, aj ycu deliver it. Again, ij it ware mem (were meant) other-wife , then might the unbelievir.gmfe be faved, and enjoy any Church-privilege by the faith of the husband^ or the husband-by the faith of the wife, as well as the child by the faith of the Barents, and that by the dpoflles rule in this Verfe, If it were meant othcrwife ; you mean fl fuppofcj if the being fan&ified of the unbelieving Confort , by or to the Be- lieving one, were not meant of your natural holincfsorclcan- nefs, or others Matrimonial Chaftity and San&ity f for I will give you in this, as an overplus) but of our, either the Belie- vers holy ufe of his unbelieving Confort , or his unbelieving Conforts being inftrumentaly (anfti&d to the procreation of children, together with the Believer. What then ? then might the unbelieving wife be faved, and enjoy any Church* privilege by the faith of the husband , and the husband by the faith of the wife, as well as the child by the faith of the Parents. For the General, its a non-fequence, and then a non-fenfe. Once morclmuft tell you of your non-fenfe, of natural holincfs or clcannefs ; you did well to joyn them together, otherwife, were it not for your clcannefs, you were clean gone as to your holi- ncfs, and rnuft go off uncleanly from your natural holincfs ; for the Apoftle never intended any of your natural holinefsor clcannefs (nor the others Matrimonial ) but either a Moral, or Ceremonial, or rather Inftrumcnta), or Sacred- ufual (if I may fo fpcak. ) And another non-lenfe of yours is> your putting of SaIvation> and enjoying Of Church .privileges together, when as the unbelieving Cenfortfan&ifiedby the believing, Xaj as many arc favcdthac enjoy none of them, and Tone enjoy many of ibem, and yet arc not faved ; yea, and putting Salva- tion before enjoying of Church-privileges, when as ordinarily Church-privileges, and the enjoying thcm,go before faving and Salvation. Thcfe things carry no fenfe in them, befides they arc not according to the fenfc of the Apoftlc and his Tcx^which fpeak oncly a word of fan&ifying , and not of Caving a fyl- lablc. And now again, from being fanftified, cfpecially the unbei lieving husband or vvife'i being fanfriricd to their being faved, whileft unbelieving is one of your greatcft non-fequences you have made in your two (heet«, though you undcrftand it of any of the fan&ifyings mentioned, mine or yours. Once more, and Iaftiy, The unbelieving husband or wife, though (anftifi:d by and in the believing Confort any of the waics, yet may not be faved and enjoy Church-privilege?, as well as the born child of a believing Parent, becaufc this child hath prcfent capable Right, aodrcal Title to aGburch-privi« lege, which isBiptifm, and all o:hcr Privileges of the Cove- nant, as he fhall grow up to them, yea and to (alvation it fclf : whereas the unbelieving hubani or wife be faved, or enjoy Church. privileges, by the faith of the believing Confort ; and you did not as well a? you might to fay fo ; cfpecially feeing children born of Chriftian Parens, are not unbelievers or Infidels, but Believers rather, as I have formerly (hewed ; as alfo how, and in what way and fenfe, luch children may be fa id to enjoy Clurch Privi!ege«,and to be fived by the faith of ih;ir Parents; to which I refer the Reader, and your felf. You write fomcthiug of the Apoftlcs rule in this Vcrfe, by which itwould follow, which you prcfumc of; but wh 1 ft you apply it ill here, it begins to be your rule, and you being the Authour of the mifapplying, arc alfo the Matter of mif- rule. I know no rule here, but the Propofition and R^foluti- on of the Apoftlc, that the unbelieving wife is (an&fi;d by the Ttt a husband* i a% 1 hoje child. whereof one aunnbehrojhe other a believ. holy. husband, and the unbelieving hu?b.?nd is CmSt fi dby the wife. The Apftle faith nor, as yon, is faved, orenjoyeth Church- priviScgcf, by or in the believing Conforr, whilcft he is an un« b Ucvet} and yet lb it may fallout, t'n.u the unbelieving Con- f>rt may be brought ofTfrcm its infidelity by the bcli -ving Confo.tr, and io may enjoy all Church prVnVgf*, and in the end be faved ; for fo Verfe 16. What k/toweji \hou^ 0 wife, fy e* ibir Mujhalt fate thy husband} (he fncaks to the believing wife of her unbelieving husband,) 0< < fow kyovrejl thou, Oman, wh- 1 her thou jhalt fave thy wife ? (To he fpea fcs alfo to the believing h»i:b2nd, of hi* unbelieving wife.) The which Text maybe a fa; hfying reafon for the coroforraU; and hopeful continuance of n^rriagc-fociety arid cohabitation, as which doth fully re- r ove thofc jealoufics that might atife in their minds from ano- ther Texs perhaps they knew of, Z^wf.7.4, 8c gj.verJP ! fhucup the Point with this. That howfoever the juft and rH h; ecus man (hall live by his faith, yet as the Apoftlc faith; the unbelieving husband is fancVirird by his wife, and the unbc« 1 -ving wife by her husband (though it may be, nottolifcor fafVatton) this fsn&ifying which theAponle mentions of the unbelieving party, is a rrfult of the faith of the believing Con- fort 5 fo the unbeliever is twice {aid to befan&ifkd, but not the B licver^ and the Belkv:r doth fancYfi: the unbeliever, or elfe I can make no fenfe of the Apoftles ArgtifiMrifi And fo now by a kindc of back t kip, I (h dl return from your third Consideration, where you ended 3brut th: unbelieving Confo'ts fanftification by the beli;ving one, unto your fiift Co; (idcration j where you begin about their childrcns being unclean or holy. Do you not fee what a great deal of trouble yrur want of good order and method, your ignorance of our tlniverfity Arts and Learning , doth create to mc ? Truly }cu might pittymc as much for the one, as I do you for the other. For fo the nest Qjereor fcruplc of Confcience in the Co nnthian Relievers unto the Apoftle, was, what they fhould do au out their children th^y had, or fhould have begotten of their Infidel husbands or wives, whilcft they lived and remained in wedlock with thefe ? and whether they mould look upon them their children , as any part of Godf people belonging to the Church, ihofe chil d. whereof one an nnbeliev. the other a believ. holy, 1 49 Church, and fo what he thought of them ? To which the A- poftlc anfwercth, they were not unclean, but holy. But the words arc not barely propounded as his Refolution of the Co- rinthians fecond Doubt or Quaere, but as an addition or proof unto their firft Qja&re or doubt, as the form and manner of the fpeech (hsweth, Elfe were they unclean, but now they are holy. The like is> i Cor. 15.29. Elfe what fhall they do who are baptized for the dead) if the dead rife not? So here, The unbelieving husband is JanQrfied by his wife, &c. elfe were your children unclean^ but now they are holy. As who fhould fay, This farther proves that Sanft fhation.becaufc your children arc holy, which elfe would beunclcan. Thus the Apoftlc here,oncof thefe Doubts or Qnae- res necefTarily flowing from another, as one fore breaking out by another, by the refolution of the fecond, as it wcrcaPlay- ftcrlaid uponitj both falvetbthat, and alfofprcads and dila- tcth the fame, to the m re perfeft cure of the fiift. But I will give yo 1 the precedency of fpcech, as who love to hear yo'3 fpeak firft ; and it is ( indeed ) my place to be but an Anfwcrer, and fo to take into coniidcration what you put to me. Siy on therefore, and fpesk out. Confider farther firfty if thi< holinefs here fpoken $ft be a holi- nefs of fan 81 fie at ion; fuch as is the way to heaven and falvation, as font; will affirm J then I pray let me ask^you this queJli9H9 from whence this holinefs Cometh? What fornc will affi-m, 1 know not, do you* then you know the future opinions of fomsaswcll (and indeed, as well) as the prcfent mindc of the Spirit in this Text. But its not mate- rial to my anfwering of you, what fomc men will affirm j let m: hear what either rhey or you do affirm ; or tell mc the names of thofc fowe, and then 1 Hull tell whether they do affirm ; but what they will affirm, I leave ic to *you to foretell, and from henceforth to b:gin to be a Prognofticator or foreteller of weather j which you may be better, than of the wills of men. Again, holinefs of fanftification ! Manbu, what is this? I do not think any will affirm it, befidesyour fclf, either to (peak fuch words, being both one, not diftinft things* holinefs being the quality or habit, and faa&ification being but the aft and operation of the fame $ fo that rather both you and they ftiouM Ttt 3 have •■ . — .■ — ■Tj-mfi- i Tir— n._— T~*"~ nr ■ ' ■ .. 1 50 Tta/e child.whereof one an unbelievJhe ether a behev.holy, have faid, it you would fpeak right Englifli, or fenfe, The fan* ft.fica.tion of holinefs, than The holincfs of fa&ification. Bjt now farther, neither is bolinefi of fanftification here fpoken of, as to the children in queftion, and under dcubt; for, becaufe ycudonot fpecific whom you fpeak of, and of whom you affirm or deny this your holincfs of falsification , let me, I pray , ask you this queftion , Of whom, Parents or their children? Cure of the children, and their holincfs (for of the unbelieving Parents and their fanftification , you have done fpcaking j and your atking me whence this holinefs ©f fantV fication cometh | and your anfwering your fclf , Either fromthelawfulnefsof the marriage of their Parents, or from the faith of the Parents, or from the Covenant ; thefe do make clear what you held in obfeurity, that the holincfs here fpoken of to be a holinefs of fanftification, fuch as is the way to Hea- ven and Salvation, as fome will affi m, no matter who, is in- tended by you to be, or at lcalt qutftioned, if not refuted, as to the being of it in thcchildreu of Parent.*, whereof one is an unbeliever. And now I have another queftion to ask you, Why you joyn together in the children onely (Tan&ification of holinefs) when as the Apoftle divided them betwixt the Parents and their chil- dren, giving fanftification to the Parent?, the unbelieving wife or husband, is fanftificd by the believing Confort, and lea- ving holinefs to their children ; Elfc were they unclean, but now they are holy ? And laftly, (for I cannot forget how when time and place was, you wearied and tired me with youf quae- res, I ask you another queftion, If your conjunction ("holinefs of fanftification J be not a tautology, or vain repetition i whether your limitation following f fuch as is the way to Hea» ven and Salvation) be not a Bartologie, or necdlefs rcftriftion ? For is there any holincfs or fanft fication, which is not the way, or tending to Heaven and Salvation ? And now Sir, to your queftion you ask mr, From whence this holincfs ( that is, of children ) cometh? snd as fcoi as you asked this queftion, and before I could open my mouth to make you anfwer, from whence a way you are gone, to your fuppofitions, If it come from the marriage of the Parents, or if from their faith, or if from the Covenant : and who arc you like Ill I Thofe child. whereof one an unbeliev.the other a believMy^ 151 like to herein? I will notgive you neither time or fcope to an- fwer ; but without all fuppofkion, (hall fay, you arc like to Pi* late, who asked Chrift this quefticn, What is Truth? and as feon as he hid (aid it, went out unto the Jews, as not having the pa'i n:c to fhy for the Anfwer, John 8. 38. Whether Pilate were able to anfwer that qucftion himfclf, What is Truth, I kaojvnof, it feems you are, and therefore made fucn haftea- vvay from me, to take my breath (as it were) out of my mouth, or rather to ftop it, and to undertake the anfwer your fclf } for prefently you follow on. If it cometh from the lawfulnefs of the marriage of the Parents , then why was not (were not) all the fons and daughters ef Solo- mon, Rehoboam, Jeroboam, Nidab, and others of the kings of Ifracl and Judah faved\ jering they were all lawfully married ac- cording to there (their) Laws and Cajloms ? and why are not drun~ kard, Qdmnkards) fwarers, ffwearcrs) and other prophane per- Tons fisved, whyle (w\\c)they fo lived and fo died ; feeing they are in our experience of tymes ftimcsj the children of lawfull married people9 according to the laws of the land ? and why was Jcptah CJcphthahJ faved, feeing be was a bjflard? How now, Sir r is all the ado for thii ? I looked for Grapse from your mouth, and you bring forth wilde grapes ; I looked for judgement, and behold oppreffion, or a fcab 5 andforngh- teoufncfi, and behold a cry, or a lye. In a word, I looked for an anfwer, and behold more queftions, and nothing but quefti« om, and thofc nothing to the purpofc ; for 1. whereas you faid before, Some will affirm, that fan&ification of holincfs in chil- dren, fuch as is the way to heaven and falvation, is here fpoken of, do you affirm if you can, of fome that fay, or ever faid, that it came from the lawfulnefs of the marriage of the Pa- rents. Here you are like Von §hixett who imagined wind- mills in the air before him, and ran a tilt at them : fo you fct up images and imaginations in your way , to queftion them, thereby to keep your felf in breath , and your pen on paper. 2t Suppofe fome had affirmed it, that childrens fanftiBcation of holinefs floras long as lam about your work, I mail ufe your word?, and when I have done that, I fhall leave there, for 1 like them not) cometh from the lawfulnefs of die marriage of their Parents, doth or may then rationally or religio flv follow thereupon 152 their childr.whereoj one an unbelt ev. the other a bel/ev. holy* thereupon inch a q-eitiun, as, Why then wete not ail ihc chil- dren of all married Parents in the Church? (for I pafsby your great reading in the Chronicles of the Kings of IfraeUvd Judah, and their G:nealogics, fo impertintnt hcrej^»and why not drunkards and fwearers, which arc in your experience of times the children of lawfull married people ? f you feem to be a man of great experience of times , and a diligent obferver of chil- drens births, and their Parents marriages, and are a fit man to be the Rrgiftcr of your Parifh, and to keep the Book ; ) why, ( fay you) were they not all faved ? and why was Jtpbthah faved, feeing he was a baftard , and not the child of lawfully married Parents r what a conftqumce, or rather, as Ifaidbet fore, a non-fequence of a qu-ftion is here from a fuppoficion r* like unto this, the qualification of coldnefs in the water, co- incth from the confluence of mowers into the pond, why then . are not all the drops and handfuls fetched thence, fwect and d t- ftilled f SancYification of holinefs in the children, comcth ftom the lawfull marriage of their Pirents, why then are not all their children and iflTucs faved ? Sirs, can you forbear fouling > They fay, when one Almanack-maker looketh upon another, they fmile both, to think how they delude fiirple people with their vain and falfe Prognoftications ; cents, when you Secta- ries fee one another, you cannot but laugh our, to remember how you deceive filly people with your irrational and inconfe- quent argumentations : offer it now unto thy Governour, thy God, will he be fie a fed with thee, and thy Q^eflion , Why not all fa. ved f he will tell thee, that thy and fheirdeftrufrion is from themfclves; but thy and their help *>r falvation is in me, faith God } not in or from any other, Parent or not Pirenr, married or not married, lawfully or not lawfully, you and rhcy arc fa. ved by th: free grace of God, and not by the fanttification of holinefs in the one or other. Yea, do you not anfwer your fclf, why drunkards and fwca- rers, who were children of lawfull married Parents , are n©t faved > Why they fo lived, and fo died drunkards and fwearers, how could they 1 But what i« all this to ourbulinefs, which is not of falvati* on, but fancTfi aiion ? Here is another of your abfurd and in- confequent quciiions i falsification of holinefs in children, if is Their childr. whereof one anunbeliev.the other a believ. holy. 1 5 3 it come from the lawful marriage of the Parents, why then are not all fan&ificd,fo you mould havefaid, 8c would,if you could have told how to keep to the Qucftion : &chen you might havi anfwered your felf, or needed not have made fuch a q tcftion, feeing even the wicked children born of lawful married Parents in the Church, are in a way, which I (hall anon (hew you, fan* ctified, and this their fancYncation is a way alfo, unto Heaven and Salvation, and all thofc whom you name, were in this way, and I fuppofe you know, I (hall not need to tell you, what fell out in the way, that they were not all or any of them faved. It is one of yourgrofic miftakes and Rcafonings, from every kinde of fan&ification of holincfs, to conclude, the falvation of fou's, when as (to go no farther) the unbeliever it here faid to be fan&ified in and by the believing, and their children are faidto be holy, from whence who can infer their falvati- on i ihefe arguing*, arc rattles for boyes to play with, not Rea- fons for men to bring forth. But whats the bufinefs, why Jepbtbab is here named > Ic it confeffcd, He was faved, becaufc the Scripture beareth witnefi of it, in Heb, 11,5a. and alfo that he was a baftard. Judges II 1. Bit feeing he was abaftard, you ask, why he was fa- ved ? why r to reach you, that bafc birth is no obftacle to free Grace, nor hirodrcth the falvation of any believer : no more than lawful marriage of Parents, fo much talked of, or rather, as yoi ftnuldhavcfpokcn, the legitimate birth of children, dorh further the falvation of an unbeliever. B it in the mean time, this Example named by you and pro- duced, doth accufc you of inconfidcratcnefs in your Confeder- ation ; for we arc both confidering (as you will have it) of the fancYificacion of holincfs in children , whofe Parents are one of them an Infidel or unbeliever, and you come in with your Jephthab neither of whofe Parents were unbelievers, (though (infill in that a&,) and fo its impertinent, as not com- ming within the compafT; of the Corinthians doubt and Quaere, or the Apoftles anfwer and Argument ; and fo you are be (idea the Matter, and out of thcCaufc and Cafe here qucftioncd in, ail your Que ft ions,being nothing to the purpofc. B it now laftly, tell me one thing, did you not once, but a while ago hold, the Apoftles meaning here, of children* being l| u u holy, of C hildren not from legitimation of birth. holy j to be nochingclfc, buc a legitimation of their birth, from Parents in lawful Wedlock, or Matrimonial holinefs or chafti- ty, (which you alfo, or ycti's make co be the very fan&ifica- tion of the unbeliever to or by the believer ?) How then can you, and with what conftancy can you now here argue againft the (an&ification of holinefs in children, as commiftg from the lawfulneft of the marriage of the Parent?, who before make lcgitimatioipof their birth, and nothing clfc to bcthcir Brth- holinrfs ? and lawful marriage to be the unbelieving Parent his fanftiricatipn ? Thus ufual ic is with God to confound the op- pofcrs of his truth, fo as to contradift their own Tenets : for as they heard only, that he which perfecutcd the Church in times p^ft, now preacheththc faith which once hedeftroyed, Faul by name, Gal. 1. 15. So we may fee now, that he which revileth the Church in times prefent, now deftroyeth the er« routs* his own crrours, which once he preached and wrote ; but 1 will not name him : and as they glorified God in Faul, fo we may glorific God in this> and fay, Great is Truth and will prevail ; vile is errour, and will fall. 2. If it come from the faith of the Parrents9 (Parents) or at leaji fromthefaithof one of them* thennC then) J pray tell me why Coyne (Cain) Efau9Abfolon and others were not favedjeeing their Farents ware (were J all faithful and belevers f believers) <*W why was Rahab the Harletfaved9feeing her parents ware Hea hem or unbelevers ; neither ware the Farents of allthofe who were con- verted at thefirji preaching of the Gofpel> belevers. Hcreisthcfiime fong again or the fancYification of holinefs in children, only to another tunc ; the former was to the time ofthelawfulmarriage of their Parents, and this istorhe tone. of faith of the Parents,or at leaft one of them. I have found or put the firft fong, out of tune, and I believe I ftiall do Co to the fecond fong, efpecially in reference to the confort or conte. quence thereof. Sanft ification of holinefs in children, eometh not from the faith of Parents, neither of them, by way of conveyance cau- falityor application, as I have faid before : that is, the faith of the Parent apprehending Chrift and his righteoufnes, and holinefs, doth not caufc, convey or apply the fame unto his or their child, thereby to juftine and fanftifie it : fo ic 011 if, if you Helinefs of Children not from legitimation of birth. 155 you will argue from ir, the faith of the Parents or one of them, to the falvation of their child, and therefore all that follows, even your confluence?, arc thus blaftcd and blown away. But yet there is a fanftification of holincfs in children, thas comes from the faith of the Parent* or cither of thcro, by way of declaration, relation or irnpetration ; that is, the faith of the parents, Covenanted with God and baptiz. d into Chrift, doth relatively, and declaratively fanftific their child, even urn to the fame holy fcal of the Covenant with tbemfclvcs ; and may impetratc hoiinefs, and falvation for him, though not impart or derive the fame to it, unlefs it be in a fcedcral way, which is a way alfo to falvation, like as if the root be holy, fo are the branches. But all this may be, but without any ncccf- fary or infallible confequence of falvation hereupon, though it is in the way, and a way thereto, as I (aid. I rauft here tell you again of the fame fault, as I did before, that our Difcourfc andDifputc,is about childrcns fanttiheation of ho linefs, and you ftill run cut, to childrens falvation of happinefs, whereas this doth not alwaies or ncceflarily, cither Logically, or Theologically follow upon that. There needs no more or farther Confideration of this Paragraph, but only of this, thai inftcad of proceeding inDifputc like an Acadc» naick and Scholar, you conclude here like an Epidcrnick and vulgar, Taking away thefubjeftof the qucftion, the holiuefi of children from the faith of the Parents : for you give inftanccg of Rahab aHrathcn, whofe Parents were Infidel*; fhewasfi- ved from the Grace of God, what is that, to her being fanfti- firdfrom the faith of Parents: the like is to be thought and faid of thofc firft converts. B-fide§,you arc out of the rexr,you undertook to expouud ac- cording to th- minde of the Holy Ghofl : for here the Co> intbi- ans ftcond Quaere, and the Apoftlcs fecond anfwer (which you arc upon) is about the living children of believers, at Jeaft one of thcro, and their childrcns holinefr, you inftance in Rahab, a grown perfon, as were alfo thefe firft converts (whofe Parents were unbeJicversj it is likely, both of them a* ro Rahab,) and you tell me of their happinefs and falvation bcine now dead : Well Sir, if you were a young man, or youth", Lwould per- fwadc you to go to one of the Uni vcrfities for all this. But I U u u 2 go 5 6 San&ift cation of children not from legitimation of birth, "' ' i — * goto another, even the laft now of yoarConfiderations, and ghd I am, thac I am come to the laft end of your Confiderati- ons, that Co having gone through them, I may return again to my Confiderationt of my latter and laft end, Veut. 32. 29. and make ready to anfwer my laft Enemy and Advcrfary, which is D.ath, 1 Cor, 15. 3. If it be a federal bolinefs that the Apolfle here fpeak? etb of, as Mr. Wcinell afirmeth (aftirmcth) and others I'kewife, I would defire to k*ow> whether ev?r any of the feed of Abraham or "David did enjoy any priveledg (privilege) of the Church upon any fuch account, without or before they had a command for it ? ware (were) they Circumcifed, or did they eate the pash^tl^ ( pafchalj before they had a commaund for it ? And 1 pray, fl?evp me if you eatiy any commaund in the Gofpel for the Parrents (ParentsJ to admit any of there (thcirj children to any Ordinance of the Gofpel without jaith in there own ferfons, or any commaund in the Gofpel for any Minijier of the Gofpel to admit perfens to any priveledg tjthe Church without faith in tiere owneperfonsy or at leajtfo far as the Minijiers of the Gofpel can judge. Sir* 1 thank you for your tour laft lines ; which being no. thing bat what yc u have Qjaered before, and I have anfwered before, (a* you^fc!f> or any Reader may fee, if you will re- view or remember)! may favc fo nuch labour and paffc by them with (i'ence, or only bid them, farewell : I (ee you begin to be weary as well as my fclf, or to want new matter, which makes you now here retrace and ret raft the old, to rcq^acre and rtq lire, what formerly you have done: Hook upon thefis, as a piece of Recapitulation, a!« its ufual, at the period of aDif- courfc, and tfhtli med to look no farther after them, having made a long look before, upon the matter if their. As for the three firft lines, you are come now indeed to the Point: your former, ifs or fup^ Oiiriom, were but circurnic- rences, or round- aboutf. Ic is now the fecond time you have named Mr. Weynell^ but not a Sentence or Argument of his do you mention, much 1 (Ic Argue agaiuft, from frft to laft of this your Gorfide ration up- on 1 Cor. j. Thcfhorteft andfweeuft, the fineftandprcttieft way of anfwcrWig and c Oifuting, you have gotttn that ever I met withal, in any man 1 1 would you could or would teach ic me But from federal holinefs. i 5 7 me, 1 am not too old yet to learn any good thing of you $ your words in the beginning would have put upon him a ialfe opini* on even your own, about the Matrimonial holinefs of the unbc« licver, as if that were this fan&irication of the believing con- fbrt, which 1 put off again, from him to you : now you afcribc unto him and others, and thai rightly, a federal holinefs to be held of them, as meant by the Apoftle ; and if you can and will (hew me (who hold with him the fame federal holinefs) that it is not meant, but only a le^'uimal holinefi, I will be your lawful Atcurney to follow this matter in your name, and moreover your confederate friends. But if I can and (hall (hew you> (who wich the others of your Se&, hold only a Legitimal holinefs J that it is not here meant, but only a federal holinefs, then ycu (hall be my confederate friend, and moreover my lawful Atturny to profecute this bu- hnefsin my name : it is agreed 5 begin you fir A, foyou have already, but not to prove any thing, cither for your holinefs of legitimation, or againft our holincfi of fcdcrality, and thus you fay. - ,If it be a federal holinefs, you defiteto kjtow whether any of the fed of Abraham or David did enjoy any priviledge of theCkuch upon any fitch account^ without or before they had acommaundfor ir, ware the) Qircumcifed or did they eate thefsfchal Lambs before they had a commaund for it} Whit ! ftili more rattling without reafoning, and prattling without prcfling? I wouTd you were as defirous to know, as here yoa pretend, you would then foon know, that your de- fire to know, is not a refuting of what others know, nor is your putting forth a Quaere, a pjttine; down of our Anfwerj of the federal holinefs ot children. Bit what do you defire to know, whether any of the fed of Abraham or David did enjoy any privilege of the Church, upon any fuch aecounr, (of the Covenant you muft mean) without, or before they had a com- mand for it ? yes, Sir, all the feed of Abraham did enjoy this holinefs, th,y were a holy feed, and people unto God, bc- caufe of the Covenant of God mad: with them, and fo were a peculiar people and privileged Church, before and without a command; as for your inftance, which you bring for proof, were they Circa uc i fed, or did they cat the [afchalLamb, be fore ! r 8 Butfrem falderal hoi meft* fore they had a Coramaund fork? it is as phtifui a proof, as the inftance is impertinent j foe our difcourle is about holincU from or under the Covenant, and your r:turn upon it, is about CircumciflioR and thcpafchal Lamb, the Seals of the Cove- nant, from and under command; fo according, to the Proverb, whilcft we ask thequcftion or Onions you make an- fwer of Garlick, other impertinent inftanccs : And the pfoof is aspittiful, for though we mould grant ir, that none* were Cir. cumcifed or did cat the Pafchal without or before a Com- mandement, yet were they holy, by vcrtue of Gods Cove- nant, without and before that Commandemcnt, yea before and without their being Circumcifcd, all the feven daits before they came under the Seal, they enjoyed that Church- privilege of holinefs, and were holy from the very Womb and birth > f^nd fome alfo fan&ified in the Womb, yea, why not all there, federally holy, being the feed of faithful Parents !) and fo the feed of David, (becaufe you mention it) the child' that died the feventh day fandfo a day before Gircumcifion) enjoyed the fame Church* privilege of holinefs,(from the Covenant) other- wife David cculdnot nor would have faid, I (hall go to it, dcclating his hopeful affurance of its happinefs and being with God, from its birth- Covenant holinefs, knowing that no un- clean, or unholy thing can enter into Heaven, i Saw, 12.23. I deny not, but children of the Jews were holy alfo by Cir cumcifion, the Seal of the Covenant, which was commanded - them ; but they were holy too, before that, by the Covenant of - Grace, which was promifed them, and to argue from their fig- nalor Sacramental holinefs, to the denial of their fcederal or Covenantal holinefs, when as children] have both holinefier, is to ftrain or winde up one bow- firing , to the mapping afiinder of the other bow- firing, when a man hath two firings to his bow. But (it feems)you would have a command alfo for chil- drens holinefs by Covenant : do you make fo little account of Gods holy Covenant, as if children upon that account of their entrarcc, and being in Covenant with God, could not or mould not be accounted holy ? is Gods Commandemrnt only able to joy them of a Church- privilege, and to make them en* joy ir, and not Gods Covenant, and Promifc: when as the Com- jfenp/p children not commanded to eat of the Pafehal. 159 Comraandcmcnt of God, lorthc holy Seal to be annexed, is but a branch of the Promifc or Covenant of God, and the Co- venant gocth before the command, and is as a firft ftep or fore* runn-r precedent of holin-fs (as I may fo fay) unto children ; The firft holy Church- privilege, is the Promifc and Covenant itfclf, aid the next,' is the Seals of the Covenant; Holinefsis more intrinfical to the Covenant, and more extrinlical to the Seal, as manifefting a difcrimination, and difference of holy people from prophanc and heathenim ; fo that children of be* lievers, may be both waies holy, in their order and times, but primarily and principally holy by C ovenant. I will be thy God and the God or thy feed, are the words and teaour of the Co- venant and Promifc, and they arc of force, and effi:acy to pro- nounce, and make holy, both rather and children, that arc ta- ken thereinto : yea morc(bccaafc lam willing to give you full fatisfacTton in all your qucres and quirkes) cherc is a Comman- dement alfo for childrcns holinels, in thofc words (though they belong to a part of the Covenant interwoven with them J Thou (halt b: my people, thou (halt be a hoIyNition, a holy teed : whereupon the Apoftle Rom. 9. 4. being to prove the ho- ly privileges of the Church, and Nation of the Ifraclitcs, faith, that to them per tainetb the Adoption, the Covenants or tejiament, the giving of the Law, the fervice of Godt and the Pr^mifes, and of whom 4s concerning tkeflejh Cbrift came : all which and cfpccial« Iy th- Covenant and Promifc?, were fancYtfying Ordinances to the Parents and their feed. But I haften to an end, and will give over fpending my pre- cious tim; about your niftc* and trifles 5 only 1 cannot but ob- fervc you, fpeak'tng of children and their holineft, how you joyn together, their being Circumcifcd, and their eating the pafehal Lara':, ar»d both by a Gommandemem. Take heed whatyoufay, children of the Jews did they eat of the pafehal Lamb, by Gomman dement of God? I Qullbe ready to give you a fair caution, left you give occafion to a foul notion. Firft, therefore be f ire of your Commandement, to have it in a rea- dinefs to fh:w 5 file w it now, and then it will be in mote readi» nefs : I have read over the whole inftitutionof the PalTeovcr, and cannot fiad: a fyllablc of fuch a command, for, ncr^a foot- ftep of fuch an example of, children eating of the pafehal Lamb :: ^ — — - - 1 60 Jewijh children not commanded to ea t of the PafchaL Lamb : It may be you may tindc fomc tuch thing aoongtt the Rabbiusy and Doftors of the Synagogues, (but you, I luppofe, regard them as little, as you do our Students, and 1 he learned of eur llni vcrfitics :) but is there anv fuch to be fen in the chair or" Mofes, or to be read in thtPcntateuch of his books f • ail thai 1 can meet with is this , that (when their children fhould ask their Parents the meaning of the Paffcover) the Parent! were to inftruct or Catcchiz : them therein, and fo prepare them for a Paffcover, againft the time fticuldcomc, that they under* ftood the fcrvice thereof ; in the mean, the memorial of the Angels palling over them in Egypt, and their parting over the Red Sea into the Wildernefs,was (b held up, even amongft their children, Exod. 13. 14. Whats now become of your old Qaaerc now, what exprefle command have you for fuch and fuch, (I retort it upon your felf,) for children* earing the pafch 1 Lamb ? Every MaJc- child ftiall be Circumcifcd, a command isexpreffe for theCircum- fing of children : Deut. 1616. and furc if children had been to cat of thepafchal Lamb, there would have bern as expreffc a command for this? and whereas Exvd. 34 23. Ibrice in the year, Jhall ally our mtn children appear before the Lord Godt in the place which he (hall choofc, whereof one time was, the feaft of the Pafleover ; irs granted, as a Commandcment, that filch chiIdrcn,who could hold the father by the hand,and walk with him up to the Temple, went along with him ; but where- fore ? namely to be inftru&cd, Carechiaed and blcffrd of the Prieft, but not to cat of the pafchal Lamb, unleff: they were of that growth in years, and in understanding of the myftery : if other wife, they had other food than the pafchal Lamb, for them of lefler age and knowledge, a« alfo for the unci ati (as fome might happen to be) and uncircumcifed, both at home, ( when they did cat the Paffcover,) and alfo at the Temple? as for the unleavened bread, 1 fuppofc the children did eat of that, becaufe for liven daies together all leavened bread was to fee put qu'ire and utterly out of the houfr, and burnt, infomuch as they muft not look upon any, yea, it was under Gods curfe, if a-iy did eat any leavened bread, diring th»(c feven daies (which at other times, ordinarily they did :)but forthepifchal Lamb, which was to be eaten up all in that one nigh:, and what remained Of Infants receiving the Lords Supper. i &x remained of it,to be burnt with fire in the morning. I take it,thc children of th« Je ws did eat nothing of it at all,who were there- fore had to bed, and laid to deep, whilcft the Parents were ce- lebrating their evening, and riight-fcrvice of the PafEover. At other Sacrifices and Offerings, which were not Sacramental, its expreffed, it (hall be for Aaron and his Sons, for the Pricft and his children) as being a part of their maintenance* Now this I the rather enlarge upon, to perfwadc you from your opinion that you have taken up, I know not where, (yes, I believe I know where you have taken il up, even where it lay, entombed) that fo you may be no occafion of reviving and rai- ling up an old buried crror,that hath Iain quiet in its grave thefc thoufand years and upwards; and that is, The adminiftring the Lords Supper unto Infants,and children of Chriftians, as necef- fary and decent. This opinion was of force in the Rowan Church in the daics of Pope Innocent the firft (1 will not name some others of anci- ent and reverend remembrance in that Age, who held ihe fame thing and practice; and did thereby ftrw, that men ftanding too much upon their own conceited interpretations of Scrip1 turcs, may fall from the truth, and crre from the faith in fomc participant; as you, Sir, have generally done throughout your whole L 'crcr ; ") for then he, and the reft of the Rowan Church ttiider him, believed that Infants baptized co'iinot be faved, exepfi they mould participate of the Eucharift; taking their ground from that Scripture, John 6. 53. Jefm faid unto tkem} Verily I fay unto puy except ye eat the flejh of the Son of man , and drin\his blood, ye have no life in you ; and therefore they held it the Lords Supper, wherein the flefhof the Son of man iseaten, and his blood dor k, neceflVy to the life and faNa- aion of Infant?. But this was not the ri^zht interpretation of th.il Tex', as which is not meant of that Euchariftical or Sacramcn. tal feafting upon Chrifts B:>dy and Blood, but of a Spiritual Faith, and believing in Chrifts Death and Pillion. And here- upon this opinion of Pope Innocent the firft, and the Roman Church under him, is fince retracted and rejected byPopeP/K* the fourth, and the Roman Church under him, in that Council of Trent (whofe Decrees arc all held and canonifed, to be be- lieved upon neceffity of falvation ) as who have determined X x x againft \%2 nf infant . receiving thejords Shpptr. afainft adnV-mfbaUor. vi«cl psrticipaJon ot the Euiharift, as ndthcr nfcefifiry nor decentrjfajt Infcms. [ H w fay yot: to ifcis , you Great Patrons gnd Imitarors of the Ghurct) noi s -i ■ d ? D;d ihe Church of K <:•*»? not crrc in the daics of Pope ijuiccy: .'< ? then is the now in an error ; doth (he not now crrc herein ? then did (he formerly erre, and confeq 'ently nny cm hereafter,] But nuw, if thofe above named had light upon your Tenet or error (a? I think it) and could have made ic hold up, which youondy jaifeandftartlc (having the Gift, asany giked Bro- ther that ever I read, to prove nothing, and affirm any thing) That the Infants of the Jews did eat of the Pafchal Lamb and Supper, they would have had a far fairer pretext, and faftcr ground, for the Infants of Chriftians to participate of the Eu- chariftical Cup and Bread of the Lords Supper ; for then they would have pleaded hard for a Commandcmcnt of Chriftian Infants to partake of the Euchariftical Supper, even in or out of that Commandcmcnt you mention, but (hew nor, of the Jcwi(h Infants to partake of the Pafchal Supper ; and prcfled it the rather, for that the Euchariftical Supper fucceeds in place under the Gofpil, unro the Pafchal Supper under the Law ; and rather more, for that the Grace of Chrift now exhibited, is of larger extent, and greater latitude, than when he was to come and be revealed. And I tell you, thefc Reafons would have troubled much thefc Tridcnrine Fathers to have anfwered and rcfelled, more than that Text of John above cited. But I believe, that you never had any fuch notion or dream in your head, cither flceping or waking; nay upon a re- view of your words, I fee I may anfwer to your Queftion, and fay at you mean, and you never the nearer to what you aimed at; for you fay thus, Did they eat the Pafr hal Lamb before they had a Commandcnt ? I anfwer, They did not cat the Pafchal Lamb before they had a Commandement ; you mean fo, do you not \ and fo do I, and what then ? therefore the Jewifh children had a Commandement to eat the Pafchal Lamb. But this followcth not well, norwilL before you follow this better* But fome others, whofe opinion I rather think you follow, than they yours, they drive it on to another defign , a? thus, B;caufc ^pZZnnt L.Suj>.»ot tobeinfer,fr*« «** *»". dation, even as the houfe felt built upon the Ow-ry land , and theXe 1 (hall but touch it, and it fink, orO.de.. Be- onely circuwdftd, Thereiore the Infants of Chriftians are not col and drink the Lords Supper, .but one y be Hnz.d <5n takine . -ff the Argument agamft Infant- Biptilm, irom its t P4 s .no , • & of one Seal of the Covenant, more than ^ftrongforycuaslcan; , youcan or h > ^ ^ sffl^Ssa'StafiSv. »>■ * - •?■? "' W^ wS oecte'of ***&&£. now Procs- them in Argument the Lord, Sapper, **$&}&£&. them of the Lords Btptumt You in J "ev"a • d R fon bidextrousinconfequencs, to which the Anf*er and Real "rYt-n'aearonand A^-erwindoit, tfiat from the one Seal ordered and ,ppni„tedffpr ««£££"££ £2 the latter clearly ( let but the A gument rcfl u,l cancan fion duto lafams to infcr rhe Lords Supper, tvhuh .» d S J Progrcffional, and of nouriih nenr, to be .If. du, to pre.e,.. 1 64 Inf. receiving t he I .Sup. not to be infer.fr .their receiv.Bap. and partaked of in intancy (like as the other) is as inconfequcne an abfurdity, as to infer time to come from prcfent, or perfe* &ion from beginning, or a man from a child, and to joyn them in one moment, ftatc and age. Can a man enter into his mo- thers womb, and be born a babe again l or as foon as he is born a b^bc, cm he run over the ages, and become a man prefently > V/k en I was a child, faith the Apoftle, I fpake as a child, and nnde.jiood as a child, 1 thought as a child', but when I became a man^ 1 put away childijh things. I mean> Infants may be ini- iia:c i by the Seal of Biptifm into the Church, and are fitted 1 6 have the Graces and Benefits of the Covenant fealcd unto them , but that they arc prefently perfected to have the nouriffr. m nt and growth of the fame Graces fcaled and confirmed unto them, by the Lords Supper, paffcth mine, and your, as much as their capacities. It is true, that both Biptifm and the Lords Supper do feal the fame, and the whole Covenant and the Graces of the fame, but both in thtrr place, order, and time, fo as the prime and main u€: of Biptifm is to be the (eal of Initiation and Recepti" on into Covenant, and the Lords Supper is the Seal of Aug« mentation and Confirmation of the fame, as to the main and 'prime ufe of it: Co m that Biptifm feals the Infants entrance and aefmiffson thereinto, which the Lords Supper doth not properly and principally, but oncly by way of fuppofition and rti't'ti :.rds Supper in their Infancy,b:caufe the Lords Supper belongs onely to fucrn; as can fpiritually examine themfclvcs, and dif* cem the Lords Body, as the Apoftle cxprefly and direftly faith, 1 Cor. 1 1.27,28,29. whereas Baptifm belongs unto Infants of Chriftiam by right of their being in the holy Covenant of God, and — 77TT' cu.n-if.d Parents I for more is required to the Lords rdb'" ttn u o &', of Church-members by nature Sl^r'-'h. whero. of Aliens and Stranger,, morels required and birth. whe™'., thln of church m:mbers unto the „f them unto Bipalm < of ^ „ ff f0, [he ^ -To a H!thenTntPothe vif.ble Cnhollck Church by admitting ota ^tflCov|.n3ncforhlmfel( B3ptife »ndh cmn^gmto h ^ ^ Lnord»Su%tr, upon the rumination of hi, faith, for the con- firmation of thc rf™c* church-Covenant by birth, have a juft TB,je,fR^fto»lUh»-- % Privileged theChurch(a. Title and Right to"1 in(|a(. time and order, astoBap- beiugfree born to them aU , . <^ -^ tifm in their .ui»ncy, bw. tel » of full d fathe, fo to the : Lord. SuPP" « • £»n bo(h ^ and evi, , and b™ *? rr 2SSSSS remains until it be forfeited by a re- this their, Covmant-ngnw excommunication nunciation of Bapufm on th,,rp»rt, or J ^^ from the other, the Lord bupper. oy rf. ,OHJof ^ when they are either "'^ "^ whoIfomCcnfure.. Covenant, or hate to bere^rrn ed b yw , ha ou) If any farther reply r(H=mu';b' * "difcern the Lord. Body That thelnfambaptiftdcan no mor ail ,f and Blood JrfS^i^j^SEA*. and therefore inthe Aftof Adminiftrationoteitner si 1 re-joyn, Btpdfm has vainly given it a *£*"„& ^^ That our Infants can and do as _weii oi ^ Sign, and the thing figmfi:d in B pt Iro i . » ■> oaf Inunts did difcern the ^ '" f ™*Xn was alfo in vain B^ufmbeinvamtoours, their o ^^ w th to their Children* and the tvpv » vanity and agaiuft Heaven, and ctarg«hOod h. nU foully, for appointing CircumcHiJno d 'j Natare dotfc tifm of Infants) whereas th< too™ " hc Jewifll Iatant! were to have the initial sen « infal,C7 ,c0 fca up the Cove, tiori imprinteaiipon ;**»£*" £**&, though they had namimtothem,und«whichtt ey w Repliertobein no fuchdi&erning, a. is now rcq i efl o ^ -— 1. ■ - ■ ' — ■ ■ — ■ 5 £5 ihe Character of orinBaptiJm. the prcfent aft of our new Minillration : fo our Chriftian In< fonts are to have the initial Seal of Bapiifm, the new Miniftra* tion, Iprinkled qpon them In their infancy, to fcal up the fame Covenant unto them, under which they arc born, though they have no more difcerning, than was mentioned to be in the Jew* i(h Infants, then at the pail aft of their old Miniftration, And yet neither of thclc Ordinances vain or inefftftual to ei- ther of the Infant parties. For the c fficaGy of Baptifm (as Cir- cumciiion) depends not upon tb; aft of the Creature difcerning and working, (this is but a ranU Romance, or a Roman prank of the Replier,) but upon the fees Grace and mercy of God conveighing and operating ; yea Baptifm is not onely a tran- sient aft, as to fprinkling of water and outward warning, bat a permanent and continued aft of the fame grace and mercy, as to the inward warning, and application of Chirfts nurits.unto all Gods children* But Jcwifti infants difecrned fomewhat, as who had a bodily feeling of the cutting of their the foreskin of theirfiefh; .and fo have ourChirftian inUnts,a bodily feeling of the water laid up- on their forehead or face?>but what's either to the purpofc of the fpiritual difcerning of cither aftion, or fign as Sacramental to them? they difcern fomewhat, and this fomewhat is nothing, nothing to the purpofc, being but a natural feeling of the cold- nefs of the water, orfharpnefsof the knife. But there is more reafbn, there fhould be demanded, dif- cerning of the fign when Bajtifmis minifircd, than there was when Gireuracifion was given, for this left a mark or print of itfclfbehindcit, fothat the Circumeifrd pafon, bare inkh body the warJ^of the Lord Jefus, (toufcthc Apoftlesphrafc,) and he did daily difcern that vifiblc fign to afTurc him, that he wasfealcd into Covenant with God; but the water leaves no impreflion upon Baptized infants, but is either prefently wiped off with a Handkcrchcif by the Midwife, or other wemsn ( though I think they (hould not do fo, and th: Miniftcrs ought to rebuke them for it,)or (hortly after it is dried up of it fc If, fo that the body is as if it were not warned or wetted at all, ar.d and no mark to be feen outwardly to pus the party in minde of his being fcalcd into God bis peculiar Servant. But what, and if there be a mark and charafter, of Baptifm, like iheCharatter of, orm Baptifa i_°> nirfi" ^ ™.ni« '»* A ' hU Paplfl. hold, U formed in 1 do not mean, in, d j f fccd ,hcKby the ex- thcful of ^ff'S^ barely in itfdfconfidcr- tCi "al ^hTh. 5SSfcSBi chafer I For f«h h not to cd, wh!*thsiyri'*",snot Orthodox writers, fuchachara- be found in S.p^« confift wi|h grace, in a foul 3* a!l IdbS i«abfard, if not impious toafenbe to damned; fiid oeMes „„ „ that wh ch i« the proper aft of an.xtern.laa.ono.a r «„5^ a, * ^ ^ God, »»,nt"nl™"fS S the bare and naked external foUl V'lftSSoUorr Sonof fins, doth imprint etcr- ufing any faith. rfcarafter, which the Ancient Or- Bat 1 mean that mark «««£§£ which was either that ^O^he^^^K^ aRd therefore cal- gracious aft, or girt never « Baptized, becom- fed anindelible chara^er : foam." gh>y Pq ^.^ ^ ming a Turk or Jew,, and aftcrwa. ds re 6 rf Church of Chrift, is » •»«*»£ * ?*C ftill remained* , hi. former Biptifm is not 'P^f/Zu' Urgel. before) or elfe the ver, graced g.(«oyheboyfp«.Cj,([WKj) fpeaketh, 2 Cor. 1.2*. »»_■" dEotl- ,. i?. In whom, af- &*#***&# '"""'r'Td'Tthlt holy fpirit of fromifii myi hlievtd, y< ™< fc'Mj an indelible fcal andcha- which alfo may very truly be called, , a d aJ -t u in the rafter, wherefoever ■•^gSrfflS «»»» b;lonSinS of in the Texts aubovc*llX?'of Baptifmis thatp.ffive power, cumcifion the Jew «^^£SSk marks or charaft:rs, So then there is m both the: «■«""» 5- a&d 0J the infano andasmuchmark, left upon the face and torcneaa i68 TheChara&erofc orinBaptifm. baptized, as there was upon your head and face, when you were dopt, or dipt over both, in the Pond or River you wot of; and though the outward mark were more permanent in Circumcifi- on, being done and engraven upon, and into the flefh by incifi- on, yet there was an outward mark inBaptifm (though more transient) done, a id laid upon the face and fltfli, by afperfion or infufion, as anciently by immerfion. Bat neither was the one character or mark more difcernablc to the one, the cireumcifed Infant, than the other to the Bap. tized Infant : neither if it was, was it more available to the par- ticipation of the PafTcover, than the other to the partaking of the Lords Supper ; or more acceptable to God, who though he fet Com runes an outward mark upon them that mourned, Ezek:9< and Co an our Ward mark upon the houfes of the £» gyptians , for good *ndz and purpofcJ> and Co appointed the external Element:* and Aft'ons, both of Circumcifion and Bap- tifm, to be holy awd profitable Signs and S*-?!*, yer arc not the outward marks in the fie&» or the fa fitiyc d fecmings of the figns> the cxcellfjici.* o< Circurnc'ifion, or the entimncicsof B :ptilm ; nor h God taken om!ys or chiefly delighted with beholding uich external fervict> and administrations; who re- quired thefe at your hand?, thefc opely or chief!} > when there* fore the Jcwifti Infants came to years of difc retion and ditccrn- ing, God looked for, and called for , not the Circumcifion of theflefh, but for the Circumcifion of the heart; this was the mark he looked far, and upon in h'? (Lccp, the IJraelires : and fo likewife , when Chriftian Infants (hall attain to the age of difcernmg and underftanding,God will look for and upon, not fo much the water in or upon the face, which was the mark of fl (hj as the blood of Chrift in the hearts which is the mark of the Spirit. And this is that I conclude with ; As one of your baptized and re-baptized adult profelytes, may have the fign of water, and difcern the fign in the very act with the eye of his fl.fti, and yet be a grofs heretick, and a vile hypocrite , yea a very repro- bate ; So an Infant may be, and but once baptized, and that in its Infancy, and want your difecrning of the fign, and yet when he comes to years of difcretion , prove a holy, pious, honcft, orthodox, and worthy Chriftian. But Children of unbelievers lawfully mdrried^ do Bafiardt. j fa But now that, according to our agreement, you and others have fpc ken fii ft, all you h ad,and have to fay for your Iegitimal hclincit to be here mcanr, againft the federal holinefs of chil- dren of Chriftians Baptiz;d : (which all, is but very little, ve- ry nothing,) it is my turn now to (ay fomethingfor our fede- ral holin.-fs to be here meant} and againft your Iegitimal holi- nefs i which ftiall be a'fo little, yet fomething, oncly a frnall addition to what I have already enlarged upon, in my anfvvcr to you hereabout*, to be as a c oncluiion to the premiums, and a performance of my promi fes. I fay then, thac the Apoltlc fpeaking of the children of Pa- rents, of whom one is a believer th: other an infi .1.-1, ar.d faying thatihey arc not uncLan but holy, do.h not mean, holinefs by legit imatton, as tr us, your children are not baftards, but hw- ful'y btgojtten and born, as you, and other of the fepiration do expound U9 inliftinK in the fteps of rhc Jcfuite*, and in th- way ol Romet from which and whom, notwi hftanding you pretend a Operation as much, y?a havetakma folcmn Cbvemn* for the extirpating of Popery. It is truefuch a bolmcis is here fpoken of, and meant as is eppofire to uncL-annef*, bur to wliat uncle mnefsf .theunclcanneisot IJolatry, and Paganifm, (Tor fbthefeare calfcd in Scripture phrafe, uncle tnrrefs and even fpiritua! Adultery and Forn cation, and all Idolaters ad Hea- thens arc called Harlots, aid faid to go a Whoring after other gods)but you and your genuine Exp fitor*, oppofetrm holi- nefs, to anothcrs unclcannefs, ouely which is bodily adul ry^ fjmication and uncleanncfs, and fo give u«, as the genuine fenfe of chofc words, elfe were your children unclean, that is baftards, but now they are holy, lawfully born, and no ba- ft-rds ; a genuine fenfe ind cd as you call, and according to the lull of the flefh, more than the mind.* of the Spirit, at you boafted in the beginning of your exposition of this ver(e. If this had ben all the matter, the Corinthian coupl >s, kn w this particular better than ths Apoftle h m^If , who knew more than th^y all, of this mireerof holinefs; they needed not to have fent to him for his opinion and icfolution., to know whether their children were baftardtor no, who knew ihcra- (e'ves, being; of the civil H.-athcn?, to be lawfully married ac- cording to the La^s and Cuftomt of their Nations, and fo their Y y y iffac 1 70 Children of unbeltivers lawfully married, no Bafiardr. iffucco be legitimate j they were lo tuiiy affured of that and this, that t hey could have made evidence, and given fath£i£tj»* on to the Apoftle, rather, then needed to have the one, or take the other from him. And whereas its held of you, and all of us, that the Apoftle here anfwereth afcruple or cafe of Conference, which the be- licving party > joyned with an unbdhving yoke-lcliow pro- pounded unto him, (as before about their conjugal fociety, fo) about their natal or natural iflue, whether it wa» to be counted to the people of God, after the believing pany, or as alien from God, after the unbelieving party 5 he anfwereth ic clearly and pertinently, their children were not unclean, but holy, by which if he had meant, they arc not baftards, butlc« gitimates; the incomparably learned and Logical Difpiter, St. Paul had not anfwered to thebufinefs, and qjeft ion pro- pounded (for they made no queftion of the legitimacy of their iflue, but of the holinefi of their Rate) and the cxquili tely pru- dent, and Theological difeerner, had very meanly refolved their doubt, and bat very cloudily elucidated their fcruplc, and afforded no peace at all to their Confciencet in this, but rather involved them in farther trouble*. For the whole City of Corinth* and ail the Heathen Regions, and conjugal couplet emongft them, would have been difturbed, and difquietcd in their Conference?, at this cafe of Confcience fo refolved by the Apoftle, and would have been filled with confuiion, ready to have laid hands on Piu/, where they could meet him, and to fay of him,This is he that hath turned the world up fide- down, and is come hither alfotobea fetter forth of ftrange refolvee and doctrines; yea to take and apprehndhim, and bring him unto Areopagus , the greater! Court of the Heathens, for calling them all Whores and Adulterer!, and their children baftards and illegitimates, by this his refolution, if it were according to voir interpretation. Look to it, Sir, for you are in danger to be called in quefti* on for this daies uproarc, and this trouble of Confcience a- mongft the poor Heathen, there being no eaufc whereby you can give an account of this con-eourfe and rugged interpretati- on. For, (obferve it I pray J if the Apoftle faying, the unbe- lieving wife it fan&ificd by the husband) and (he unbelieving uibind Children of unbelievers lawfully married^ no Boflards. \ 7 1 husband be fan&ified by the wife, clfc were their children un- clean, did mean, clfe were they baftards, according to your interpretation ; doth not he, or rather do not you make him, call all thofe children baftards, whofc both Parent! were or are unbelievers 1 it it palpable, you do s for if the unbelieving par- ty were notfanft h-d by the believing, then were they un- clean, that is, baftards you fay ; and in fo faying, you fay thus much, That all children of thofe Parent!, whereof the one is not fancYifisd by the other, are unclean, that it, baftards; for the foimer proportion being conditional and hypothetical, were not true, if this proportion, which is positive, and catc* gorical were not true : or more plainly, I will refblve the truth or the Apoftles feq id, (the unbelieving husband is fan&ifccd by the wife, &c. elfe were your children unclean:) into this pro* policion, from which ic floweth, namely, All the children of an unbeliever are unclean, unlcfs the unbelieving husband be fanft ficd by a believing wifc,or the unbelieving wife be fan&ifi- ed by a believing husband,for generation and coitiona*, I have faid : Now give you the fenfe, and bring in your interpretation of it. All the children of an unbeliever are baftardi, unlefie the unbelieving husband be fan&ined by a believing wife, or an un- believ ng wife be fan&ined by a belt ving hmban 1,fo generati- on and coition : and then tell me whether you do net make the Apoftle fay, or rather fay your (elf, that all the children of the Heathen and unbelieving Pa rents, of which the one is not fan- -cYsfied by the other belie v ng are baftardi, notwithstanding born of both Parents in lawful wedlock according to the Lawi and Gultome of Nations. If the Apoftle Paul had preached this docVine, that you by your Exposition would feem to make him, be would have been in many more perils and hazards, whilcft he pa(Tcd through the Pagan and H athen Nations , than he was , and would not hate converted to many of them as he did; and I wou'dwifti you to be very wary, when you go over to the Savages in Afap Ei goad, and the Pagans in our Wc:i lnde both waics, backward and forward* that baftards are unclean, and the unclean are baftards. And whereas biftards amongft the Jews might not, by their Laws bear any Office in Magiftracy ordinarily : (for Jephthah was extraordinarily chofen, by God and the people for his valour) nor fie in the Sanctuary, nor e x» ccutc any Prieftly Officers ovr r the Congregation of the Lord, Vert. 13.7. (like as by theCivil Laws, they could not enjoy Inheritances,^ yet they were Circumcifed, and might eat the Paffcovcr, and had free acceflf. to the Temple, and Tabcrna« cle, to perform worfhip and hear the Law, and were federally holy, as any legitimates. But for the particular of infants holinefs, I fay, 1. in gener- al, Any perfon, or family f for fo it was at fii ft, in Abraham) or Nation (as afterwards it was with the Jews, and is now with the Gentiles) that are in Covenant with God, and enjoy the Ordinances of his grace and mercy, do alfo, by vcrtuc of Gods Promife, 1 will be thy God, and the God of thy feed, convey to their ifluc and poftcrity, a ftate and piivilegc, ( and fo rather, it is the joynr Covenant made by God with both together, the Parent, and hisiffue and poftcrity,) to be rerutcdof a holy, and clean fociety and Cong egatton before God, from the o- thcr Pagan and Hcathenifh world, and fo the child or children born of fuch Parents in Covenant, to be truly holy, like as he Parent, becaufc of the Covenant. Not Federal holinefsy not legitimate here meant. 175 Not that the iuiar.ts hivz any res! perfonal qualitative holi- ncfs in th.m, (which is and rnuft be in all true believers, whi- ther Parents or children, to make them zcccptablc toG d a) to Juftification and Salvation) whom 1 confefs, though tron wi hin the Church, and of believing Parents, to be born in fin, naturally, and be unclean, children of wrath by nature, as well as others, the children of Pagans, without the Church. But I fay, they have a federal and parental, (fo it may be cal- led by a favory mouth) and relative or imputative holincfs, put upon them by the Covenant of God, and brought forth or executed on them, by, or at their birth ol believing Parents, which is fufficicnt and enough to make them patTc in the eyes of God, and in the face of the vifible Chnrch, for clean and holy 5 or if not, their profeffion of the faith of Chrift (for you will not deny them to be profcfTorsof Chrift, and members of the Church in part and inkinde, at leaftwife) by the mouth of their Sureties prcfenting them, and fpeakiog for them, this will bear them out, to be holy likewife. And whit if, 1 mould tell you in your ear, that Chriflian infants in Covenant with God, are holy too, by an inward ho- lincfs a! (a, (arc not all inward fan&ifying graces, effects of Gods Covenant, and who knowcth when God, as where, he effidit them ? ) you, perhaps, would ftop that ear, cry out. " Then grace, which onely maketh holy, cometh fuccellivcly c< and is derived by nature, and Parents (hall be the authors, «' and conveighers of grace and holincfs to their children. No fuch matter, Sir, For the children arc primitively holy with the Parents by the Covenants as co- partners and confederates with them therein ; (I will be thy God and the God of thy feed) not derivatively holy from the Parents, as folely or firft partners and prefederates without thefc ; Chriftian Pa. rents and children are both, joynt confederates, I fay, and do both draw and derive together their holincfs, as other privi- leges, from the Covenant and Tenour of grace therein, and not fucccnwely from one another, children from Parents deri. vatively, as you fondly fanfic to your fclf, and erronioufly imagine* The which truth may alfo ferve much, to clear off thofe cloudy difficulties, fo much prefled by the Anabaptijlical puiy, from the Jefuiuctl fide, about infants being Bap izrd, tai&ifred !J5 Infants can give no external fi in oj holineji. farcified land by the faith of their Parentf, as ihcy uic 10 blate and bhzc abroad. You, like enough before you will believe any holinefs in them, would have then? (hew f )tne fuch thing, cither in words before they can (peak, and whilcft thc> arc infants, that «s, non- fants \ or indeed, before they have any idoneity of initruinents and ability to aft. ("Have pai.e.tte a while, and you may hear th^m (peak Lhc word?, and tee them do forne aft« of holi- nefs.) Wha* ! are you fo f niual, ali for fenf , and fo altogether lead by fenfe, that nothing, but a fenian've or tcnfible manifefta- tion or holinefs in children will be belitvcd by you f I had thought, you had walked by fauh, ad not by fight ; you Re- lieve a holinefs,, in other tilings, in Faith, in the Word, in the Sacrament?, in the Churchor God, and in all thing?, which the holy Scriptures, the oracles of holincf?, have pronounced holy, thouj^h you have not a vitible and fenftblc demonstration of holineis in them (you walk by faith there and not by fi hx) and why cannot you believe a hrolinef?, in children of Chriftian Parents in Covenant with God, though they (hew forth no fenfiblc ifFc&s offuch holinefs, feeing alfo the fame holy Scrip- ture, doth call them holy, and not unclean? and fo fuppl) ing their defect of fpcechand a&ion, giveth you what you ask, even a fcnfible manifestation of their holinei?, and fpcaks them holy unto ycur ears, not declares themholy to your eyes, (fo you niay now walk by fight,and hear fay,not by faith and hope, limping, and halting therein, for except you (hall fee in their hand?,and tongues, the prints of holinefs in work?, and words, and (perhaps) thruft your fingers into their fides, to feci the holinefs of their hearts too, in affeftions and thoughts, you will not believe. What and if our Saviour Chrift mould now, as once, sake one of our little children in Covenant wiih him, snd let iebe- fore youj and fay, whomever humbletb bimfelf as a little chili* the fame is greatejt in the Kingdom of Heaven-, for of fttch is the Kingdom oj Heaven? would it not be ftr.*ngc for you, tot' II him, you fee nofu:hj(yet you hear of fuch) humility, lowls- nefs, mcaknef?, mildocf?, innocency, in children: and is it not a like, to tell htm, you fee no fuch holincfi here, when you hear ot ir, from the mouth of Chi ift, his and (h>s Apuftle Paul here Holinefs of Inf .derived from Coven :holinefs\ not Parental. Iicre faying, they are holy ; But that I have faid h before and already, I would fay, that aven children (hew themfelvcs more hu!nblc,lowly,tt»cck,miid,and mnoccnt.ind fo more boly9than a great many of your grown ProfefT>rs, and grand Pretenders unto holinefs and all thofe graces* let their holineft and other graces reft but a while, as feed hidden up in their heart!, or wrapped up in Gods Covenant with them, and fee, if after- wards they do not (hew it, and their holinefs break not forth as the light at noon day, that was within the cloud, or as the feed in harveft, that was within the clod $ and in the mean time, fhew me thy faith by thy worlds, and thy holinefs, by thy words j and learn to fpeak better of childrens holinefs, and to do better with children for their holinefs, even fo well, at to let them be Baptized. Bit befides this in hand, there are two eminent Texts, that hold out infants of Christians, their holinefs by Covenant : the one is, Rom. II. 16. Ifthefirfl fruit be h»ly, the lump alfo is holy, and if the root be holy^ fo are the branches. I know the ftream ofour Divine Advocates for Infant-Baptifra run altogether, and out of this Text, upon a derivative holinefs from the Pa- rents or Anccftors, to their children, which notwithftanding they call and make a federal holinefs ; 1 am not willing, in my old and infirm daks, toftrive orfwim againft a ftream, onely I will be bold to venture, and wade fofar, as to hm again, and mention unto thofc skilful ftccrfmen, now efpccially that the waters of ftrifc about Infant- Baptifm are rifen high, what great difficulties, and intricate Objections arc laid upon the * Point, as pleaded and held to be derived from the fall h or ho* linefs of Parents and Anccftors, the which, for my part, I have not found fo eafie to extricate and (hake off; though 1 have faid fomething for it, and enough againft my Antipoe lo baptift here. I do therefore refer this to better Con (iteration, whe- ther our PJea for Infant- Baptifm would not be ftron^er, clecr- «r, and more confonant to the Truth, (not true I any way do implead the other, as weak, dark, or diflbnant) If lr be made dirc&ly and primitively from the Covenant it iclf, and the faith (of which before much is faid) and the hulinefsof chil- dren themfelvcs thereby. I fee indeed, our worthy Divinrs do interpret, and call the Zzz derivative *77 178 Holinefs of inf. derived 'front Coven.holinefsjiot Parental, derivative hdinef*, from Pd»en.'8Co their child cns a federal holinefs coo ; and fo we all agree together in our general mean- ings : but would it not be more properly, and rightly called, a federal holinefs, if it were faid to be derived from the Cove- nant of God, as to Parents, fo to children, to both joyntly , equally and indifferently made? And mefhinks the Text a- bovc cited fpcaks clear for it, fomewhat clearer in the Origi- nal than in the Tranflation, ai to the former part, but if the firft fruit (be) holy, And, or fo, the lump is ; if the root (be) holy, And, or fo,the branches are. And thus wcfhallnot need to fly to Parental holinefii, asfometimes we are driven (or faith, of which before,) for the upholding of holinefs in chil- dren, feeing we may have federal holinefs for them j the which I know nor, but that it may be called a pcrfonal holinefs, (Yure it is not an abftraft Metaphyseal, Metaphorical, or an aerial imaginary notion) I fay a pcrfonal holinefs, being in or upon the perfons of children, as the Covenant it, and as other rela- tive privileges, and the imputative rightcoufncfsofChriAare* If I errc in any thing here,l will not be cither Heretique or Scif. matique, for I am ready to refract, if convinced, not willing to divide from the differing : Either way, it will be frill a fe- deral holinefs, and good cither way againft you, Sir. And therefore alfo, fomeof thofc our Divines do Expound the ho- ly Root, and firft fiuitj in St. Paul, to be the Covenant, (and in a good fenfe and founding to that I have faid, it may be fo) upon which Abraham and his (ccd9 and fo along, all believing Parents and their children, do grow together as holy lumps and branches ; and it is by vertue of fuch Covenant, that Abra- ham and every believing Parent, is called and meant, the ho- ly root and firft fruits, and their children orpofterity, the ho- ly branches or lump. For the holy Covenant ftjyed not-, and determined in A" brahurri and his feed, Ifaac and Jacob, (a* fome fay) becaufc the Covenant runs in their names onely, the God of Abraham, the God o( liaaC) and the God of Jacob, as if that were meant^ when God Covenanted, / will be thy God, and the God of thy fied\ God often rcntwed this his Covenant with that people, e- ven afccjr thofc Patriarchs were deceased, and the Covenant en- tered into with Abraham^ was an everlafting Covenant, and com- Jl ' ■■■ I— II _-■ Holintfs of Inf. derived from CovenMinefs^ot Tarental, 1 7 9 comprehended under ic all Nitions, as the Jews, even the Gen* tiles, as many as the Lord our God (hould call to the faith of Abraham, had a (hare therein -t and in the eternal privileges thereof, both Parents and thildren, and were both holy there* by before the Lord, as in others and the Churches account. For not onely the Jcwifh children the natural branches of their fa- ther Abraham^M he be the holy root, as he is,buc by vertue and in refpezz 3 1 82 Of interpreting Scripture by the learning of the Spirtt. may keep together in the fame head-houlc, fo long as Hagar is an obedient handmaid to her Miftris Sarah, and Humane learning humbly ftbmits, and is £.Tvant, or fubfervicnt unto the learning of the Spirit, and the Mifterics of it. But of this mat- ter there is enough written before 5 and how it fhould nowai thclaft app artoyo'i, that the mod learned by Humane lear- ning, do want thr learning of the Spirit, to interpret Scripture, (if youme*n it of thofe who interpret the Scriptures for In- fant-B tptifm, againft you) it is marvelous tome j for I will inftance but in this one, and laft interpretation of 1 Cor, 7. 14. But now they are holy : We interpret it, holy federally, as who are born in Covenant with God, and of a believing Parent or Parents in Covenant with God, and fo arc not unclean, as the Gentiles out of Ccvenant; but you interpret it) holy legiti* mally, at who are lawfully born of Parents in wedlock accor- ding to theLaw, and fo are not unclean,, as baftards born out of wedlock; now do you remember your wards, four times repeated in one of your pages, 1 will repeat them once more for you, but to you, Judge you, but judge you righteous judgt- wentt for God will : judge you, I fay, whether of the interpre- tations favours moft of Humane learning, or the learning of the Spirit, yours or ours 1 doth it not clearly appear to your eye?, that your interpretation is a meer Humane, natural, car- nal, political interpretation, and fuch as yon can bring no word or example for, from the learning of the Spirit,thc Scrip* turc«, where holy arc called or meant, legitimates; andun« clean, baftards ; and therefore it is a meer Humane learning, and not agreeable to the learning of the Spirit, nay rtpagnane to it, for by the learning of the Spirit, all baftards are not un- clean, nor all legitimates, holy. But our interpretation is a very Divine, gracious, fpiritual, Ecclefiaftical interpretation, and fuch as I have brought both word and example for, from the Scriptures, the learning of the Scriptures, where all in Covenant with God, or born of Chriftians, or one Chriftian Parcnr, are (tiled holy, and all childeren born out of Covenant, or of Parents both Heathens, are called unclean i and therefore ours is the very learning of the Spirit, (to take your words now cut of your mouth, and put them into ours, as juftly I may) according to the minde of Of interpreting Scripture by the learning of the Spirit. 183 orth-Sjiik, as who declared u no us, in the Scriptures, and we from if, to you, that all Covenanters, born of Covenanters with God, are holy, and all out of Covenant, and born of fuch as arc out of Covenant, are unclean. And fo now by this (as indeed by all, or moft of the Scrip- ture?, thit you hive made ufc of throughout your whole L:c. . ter, which rather you have made an abufc of ) it will appear, yea doth, that your felf is one of them, the moft learned by Himane learning, (certainly. Sir, for all your talk againftit, you have been at the University, and gotten up fomc Humane learning, and are a great Prattitioncr therein, as appears by this, and your other interpretations) yea, I take you to be a man, if not a Matter of Arcs and Humane learning, more than of the learning of the Spirit (though pretending to this more) a better Humanift than Divine, or rather an Alchymift, who can extraft out of the Spirits holy, in Scripture, the fpirit and flefh to a chili l?wfully born, and out of fpirits unclean, the quinttfTence of a baftard. Do you call this, the learning of the Spirit, to Interperate Scriptures with all? (for fo you write, and (hew your felf to be good at expounding, as you are at fpcliing, your Orthography and Orthodoxy being both alike,) do you interpret the Scrip- ture by your learning of the Spirit f no lure, you Interperate (interpret) Scripture rather^ by the ignorance and illiteraturc ofyourflcm; Interperate, (what's that ?) is it not Intemperate, or wterprate? furc ici6not, to interpret Scripture : No mar- vel indeed if you would have me, to confider of thefe things you have written, with an unbiaffedfpirit9 and a jelf-denying humble fpirit fuch as thofe fpirits are that art guided by the fpirit of the Lord: For fu rely, then your fpirit hach not been guided by the Spirit of theLord, as which ig, orhathb:cn in your Letter, a byafTcd fpirit, and an all other, befides your felf, denying, proui fpirit; and therefore without any juft ground, you ar~ rogiee thofe words of the Apoftle, to your own prattife, faying as he, 2 Cor. 2. 17. We are not as many , which corrupt, ordeal deceitfully with the Word, but as of fenczrity (fincerhy) £wf as of God, in the fight of God fpea\we in Cbriji: What you fpeak, when you arc teaching, and expounding, or praying, Iknow not 5 this I know, by the experience you have given of your felf 184 °f interPretw& Scripture by the learning of the Spirit* felt to me, that in your writing and citing Scripcures in your Letter, you are the moft corrupter, and the nioft deceiptful dealer, and wrcftcr alfo of Scripture, that ever I read; I do not know many, fcarcc any, that go beyond you, except your Ma- tters and Tutours, you know whom I mean ; and your fince- rity is as falfc fpoken, as written of you; if as of fincerity, as of God, in the light of God, you (hall fpeak iirChrift, it will be acceptable, as to God, fo to man and my felf, if renouncing the hidden things of difhonefy, not walk^ngin craftinefs, not handling the Wordo] God deceitfully s but by tnanijejiation of the truth, you commend y our f elf to every mans confeience inthe fight of God, as yen add of your [elf e ,2 Cor. 4. 2. Co nparing [primal things with [piritual; but lb you did not, when you compared the holy and legitimates together, aBd the unclean with baftards (to go no farther backward,) And Scripture with Scripture, for Scripture is the beft Interpreter of Scripture, (neither did you fe> when you could fiiidc no Scripture to compare with 1 Cor.y. 14. that either did interpret or intimate, baftards to be un- clean, and much lefs fignifled by this word there, or legiti mates to be holy, and much lefs meant by this word there. For that inthe clofe of your Letter, which concernethmy ("elfin particular, utthatyon fheuld gladly fee better fruits from tn-e, If I knew what fruits you mean, 1 mould foon tell you whe- ther or no, I mould ever glad you fo much as to ftc them ; but if they relate to which immediately gocch before them, the wrefting of Scriptures by Humane learning, Imuft tell you, that the roat that I am graffed into, and which bearcth me, (hall ever (\ hope) bring forth better fruits, though I qucftion your gladncfs in feeing them , as being oppoutc to your fruit* ; who throughout your whole Letter have been gathering, yea, pulling and enforcing, thorncs of grapes, and thirties of fig.«, divers errorneous Tenets from Texts that will nor, nor can,bear them, the which I am fbrry to fee from you. And for your intr eating me to lay a fide-, all [el fe- ends and b)-re- [pells, yournuft pardon mc herein, for I took up the defence ofmyfclf, and my Miniftery and Infant-BaptHm, as well as of others, making both my end, next unto Gods glory, and the truth (without ai:y other by refpefis) which I muft not upon your rcqueft lay alidc : but for that which followcth ; I have [erioufly Of interpreting Scripture by the learning of "the Spirit, i g e ferioufly considered the things and words of God fpohgtby the Spirit efGodin the. Scriptures, which were all written for our learning and imitation, yea moreover have enfoimcd you in particular, how far forth all which were written for our learning, were written for our imitation, fome of them, and fomc of them not, which you indiftinftly and confufedly jumble together j yea,, and according to your farther intreary, I have turned to and looked into all thofe Scriptures you have but quoted and named and not written out for want of time as you [ay, and have writ out all the iPords of mojt of them, (as who never want time to fearch out the Truih of the Scriptures, if I wantnot health:) You»felf beft know, whether it was for want of time, or for want of truth, you did not tranferib* the words, as making, moft an end, nothing to the purpoft or Point, for which you iec down and multiplied Chapters and Vcrfes by their figures onely, and whether this was, Not walling in crajtinefs, nor handling the Word of Ged deceiptfullyi bttt by a manifefiation of the truth, a commending y our f elf to every want Confcience,whether this was of finceriiy, as of God, as in the fight of God fpoken or written, judge you, but judge righteous judgement, for God willy who trieth the heart, &c. For that in the clofe ftill of your Letter, which conccrneth yourfclfj it is your deftre, that whereinyou have erred I would inform you by plain Scripture, It is done to your hand, bur, I fear it is not gone to your heart, whofc heart was and is, (I furmife) refolvcd before hand, as your hand laid upon your heart to that purpofe, of not acknowledging any error, or fub- mitting to information ; for what hope or likelihood is there hereof, when as prcftntly you adde, leu are confident heare (here) is nothing afertedC&ftzrted^nor queared but will nor* ap- pear e a truth proved by Scriptures, and li\ewife will appeare at the great day ? Wherefore then do you intreat me, to weigh things ferioufly, and if you have erred in any thing, to inform you> when as you are confident here is nothing aflertcd or quaercd, but will now appear a truth ? juft as the man in the Gofpel pro- x fcfled to follow our Saviour Chrift, and went away pretently about other matters of no fuch confeqaence ; you likewifc fay, you will be informed by rnc, Wherein you have erred, and in the next wordi you arc confident of noching afferccd or q xr-d Aaaa* by 1 86 0/ interpreting Scripture by the learning of the Spirit. by you here, but the very Truth. I am pcrfwaded the worfc will b: much alike, the informing you, to the laying down of any error of yours, and the wafhingof a Lropard, to the put- ting off any of itsfpors; Bit I mould gladly fee better fru'ts from you, than futh a non refolution and br^flTc-forehcad, (which for the rroft part is in r»ofi; of the Revo'cers from our Church ani the Truth) a? not to be conform rd and converted, when informed, confuted ; notwithftanding, Though 1 have la- boured invaitt) andfpent my ftrength for nought, and m vainly et purely my judgement is with the Lordt and my rvork^with my Godylfa. 4 p. 4» But, Sir, are you confident that there v nothing rffertcd or qusercd, but will appear a Truths what that which is affined by you may appear, let paflTe* bu fare, that which is qnjered by you here, will not now appear a Truth ; neither, now, nor ne- ver will it be a Truth, no not at the great day, that which ig qjae cd oncly j your Quaeres were your judgement, as you af- firmed before, now you affirm, they are a Truth, proved by Scriptures, and yet but propounded in Quaeres ; and what will they be at the laft "i your Quaeres will appea^ (you fay) a Truth alfo, at the laft and great day -, you will be deceived, then, as now ; for your Qnaer. *$ are not Refoluriens, Decrees, Axioms, but Quaeres j it doth not yet appear what is Truth in them, to your (elf or any others, pit them out of Queftion, intoPro- pofitions,come out of yourQu32res,into your Refolvcs,and then I will tell you, whether now in the later little daies they do, or in that laft great day, they will appear a Truth or Truths. In particular, (to pafle by your Qucftions and Qjercs,) your Sacrilegious tlfurpation to Preach, Baptize, and ri'ftributc the Sacramental Bread and Wine, your injurious Dwtenfion of Chriftian Infants from Baptifm, the Seal of the Covenant God made with them alfo; your ridiculous dopping and plunging of grown pcrfons, over head and ears backward in a Pond, who were before Baptized in their infancy in the face of the Congre- gation j yourScifmatical feparaticn from yonr Parochial and — National fellow members, profeffing truth and holincfs; your Scurrilous railing upon the true vifiblc Church of England? and theMiniftcrs thereof, asBaaliti(h,D.v'rllifh, and Antichriftian, profeffing and worftiiping Chrift Jefus, and God in fpiritand truth, Heretkhj confuted here, appeal to the laft great day. 1 87 truth, with a world more? of fraudulent mi (interpreting, and mifapplyingg of fkcredwrir, virulent Calumniations or holy Truth , violent oppositions of lawful order , uncharitable imagination*, and contempts of higher Powers, and all pa- Cons who arc not of youi S .& and Set : can I think, or any man elfe, whofe brain? and heads have not been intoxicated by a fa- perfluous re- baptizuion, that chefe will appear a Truth, or truths at that grr at and laft day , which in all the former daies, the Word of God hath judged, and condemned for er- rors and untruth* 1 it hath been the fafhion of fome Hcretiqucs and Scifmatiques, when they have been confuted,and confound- ed with the evidence and light of Truth, which hath been flatbed in their facets hen from the Word and Scriptures, to make their appeal? to the greatsand laft c?ay for trial,and tojefus for the Judge of truth or untruth : but we have it already, as a ruled Cafe from himfelf, in the 12. of John $2. vtT*lkeword that I havefpokent the fa we Jh all judge hint ( and ycu, and all,) at the lafi diy: and the Apoftlc Paul fpeaketh of the fame dayJFben God jbalt judge the fecrets of me v^ac cording to his Gofpel3Rom.2.l6. Flap not me off therefore with this put off, o't your Tenets (if you have done with Q^aerci, as its high time) that they will appear Truths at that great and laft day : for if you cannot now in this your little prefent day, make them to appear Truths, according to Chrifts word, and Pauls Gofpel, (better than you or other? have done as yet, and yet I think you, and they have done your beft) they will never appear Truths in the great and laft day, but the Word and Gofpel will then, at now they do9 appear againft tb^m, for errors and untruths, and by that Word and Gofpel, Chriftand hi? Apoftlcs, and all the Saint? (hall judge, and condemn them tor fuch ; fo that you and they, who held up your heads in thefc waters of ftrifc, and con- tention here on E»rth,with the puft and blown bladder? of your fclf ccnceiptcd fsnfie?, will be fain to hang thrm down in ft * fb imc, and confuilon of face, Calling upon the Hills tifallnpon eve you, and to the Mountains toctveryox, front the face of hint that fueth upon the Throne, and from that (rt:ne and luftre of Truth, that then will appear at that great and laft day, I will therefore give you the good counfelof the Apoftle; Let every ntan(JQT thecounfel is good for all of us) tak$ heed Aaaa 2 L 8 8 Submijfion and Smje&ion to the Word. how he buildeth upon the Foundation, Jefus Cbriji ; every mans work^jhall be made mam (e[l ; for the day jha. I declare it. (£fpc» clally the great andl&ftday, youfpeakoff) Becaufe it Jhall be revealed by fire, and the fire Jhall try every mans workjjfwhat fort it is, whether Gold, Silver, precious Stones , or whether Wood*, Hay, Stubble ; if any mans vpork^ abide which he hath built there- upon, he Jhall receive a reward ; if any mans work.jhail be burnt, he jhall fuffer loffe, 1 Cor. 3. io^and 12. And whereas in your next clofe, you bid me lye down before it and {loop to it, itisfpoken like an imperious School Matter, or imperial Matter of the Field, (which as yer, you aic nei- ther;) as for all the Truths of Chrilt, fet forth in his Word and Gofpel, I do here ftoopto them, and ly flown before them, proftrating, and cajiing down all my imaginations, and every thing ("of my Reafon) that exahetb itfelf againji the knowledge of Godi&bringing into captivity every thought (or affection of mine,) to the obedience of Cbriji, and his Truth and plcafurc, laying my hand upon my mouth, and putting my mouth in theduji, and laying duft upon my head, ldo here bow down my head, in- cline my heart, throw down all within me and without me, and wholly, and totally yield my felf unto Truths of the Word ofGod? as to the Victorious and Conquering, the powerful and Triumphant Rod and Scepter of Chrift : Spcah^Lord for 1 Sam.g..io. thy fervant heareth : The Lord, he is the God% Ihe Lord, he is the 1 Kings 18.39. God', God is not as man that he fbottldlye-, a Godof Truth and Numb. 23. 18. witkout iniquity, juji andright is' be} yea God is truth itfelf: Dcut.32.4. anci Chrift isfheWay and the Truth : and the Spirit is truth, 1 John 5 6. And thy Law is truth, and all thy Commande- ments are truth, John 1^.6% Pfalm lip. 142, and 151. thy Word is true from the beginning: Pfal. up. 160. and fo to the end thy Word endureth, Heaven and Earth fl> all pa ffe away, hut one jot and tittle of the Word jhall not paffe away till all be fulfilled, Matth. 5. 18. But, Sir, to lye down before, or ftoop to your Qjxrcf, and Confiderations and Interpretations fo void and empty of the Divine Truth of God and his Word, fo full and even fwoln with the Humane fanfic of man and his will, though you mafterly expect it, 1 (hall Scholarly defeat you : I am now tooftrong and well trafs'd, andtruth'd, tountrufle or untruth to fucha-dip-dop pedant (or rather Anti-pedant) as Submjjjion and Subjcftion to the Word. I 89 as you arc, fuch a one as you are, I could have disciplined chat way and difcipled any other way, fifty years ago : and I have too much oihdordecai the Benjamite in me, and of his zeal to the Church of God, than to bow or ftoop to fach a llaman^ a man, thcAgagite, thefeparate thatfpeaks foill and vilely of the people of God, and fecks to deftroy it and them utterly. N-iy rather let your Dagon fall upon his face to the earth before the Ark of the Lord, and your Quaerulous errors iic down before the Truth , and ftoop to it, now that that I have brought it unto your boufc, and fct it before your face and eyes : and if you would but rife up betimes in the morning, and admit in of the light of Chrift, that trae morning Star, you might fee your Dagon fallen down before the Ark, and the truth (landing up over your errors : I doubt not, but there will be thofc (for, Sir, if you will be ruled by your friend, ne- ver meddle more with any controvcrfic of Divinity, I had al- moft faid Text of Scripture) that will take up Dagon again, and fet him in his place again ; but I may foretell them,it will be labour loft $ for when they rife up the next morning, they will behold Dagon fallen again upon his face to the ground, before the Ark of the Lord, andinworfe cafe than before, with his head and both the palmes of hi« hands cutoff upon the thref- hold, and onely the ftump of Dagon to be left him. " But why mould I lie down before and ftoop to your Quae* *c ret, Confederations, and Interpretations, and the Truth of CE them that will appear at that great day, and now appeareth *' proved by Scripture«?For that now lam tnforn\cd( informed) > •' and fo cannot plead ignorance before the Lord at h s appear- What is the chaff to the wheat, faith the Lord by Jeremiah f Jer.2$ . 28. If, Sir, you fpread out any more fkrapnets, and fend cut any more Letters of Information to me, let them be more literate, and better baited with wheat, elfc I (hall not come down to them, as who care not for pecking amongft fuch light and ch any Quaeres and Confidcrations, though I like well of found, folid, and whea- ty Reafons and Argumentation*. Again, what are the refufe fifh, to Soles and Salmons > now that you have toiled all this night, (for I fee you fiftied in the dark nightj and have caught nothing of worth j if you launch out into the deep again (of * controvcrfiesj and let down your NL't again (of another Let- ter) for a-draught fof Objections or Anfwers) I pray be care- full to enclofe a multitude of gocd fim, Salmons and Sole* (of folid Objections and Reafons , falving Anfwers and Diftinfti- ons) or elft I (hall not be beckoned to, to come in, as who can- not ("though I love Fifli well, fuch as are fcund and whole as a fiih (hould be, as I have mentioned^) feed upon poor John* and frefh Herrings, Minna- Quaere?, and Sprat Confederations, and fuch other refufe fim j you will never fatten mc, or inform, or iramittcr me, with fur h ; but I (hall (till be lank, lean, and ig« norant, and may plead ignorance before the Lord, it his appea- ring (for any thing of knowledge I have found in you,^ and when he will reward every one according to his'work* you arc not like Submijfion sndsnbjettion to the Word* 191 like to be rewarded, for your informing me, or for your inter- preting Scripture, or for y our den y ing Baptifm to Infant^ or for your dipping again the baptized, or for your reviling the Church of Chrift, and hi? Minifters, or for prcfuming to preach in Pulpits, without Ordination and Authority j for there Jh all be no reward to the evil man, Prov. 24.20. Therefore take heed of having an evil eye, or evil tongue , againft little Infanta and their baptising, or againft the great God, and his Church and Minifters, and bringing an evil report or interpretation up- on the good Word of God, and the Scripture?, deft God re- * ward you according to your work, and your evil work be re- warded with an evil wages of punishment ; for David's prayer is ftill with God, PP/.94.2. Lift up thy felf9 thou judge of the earth, render a reward to the proud. Bit now again, Sir, why do you follow , And if you can anfwer tkefe j?Wra and.Confider attorn by plain Scripture, I pray do, orelfe hold your peace, and leave your unwarrantable pra' Gices / Did you not tell me but even now, that I was informed now by your Quaeres and Confederations, fo that I could not plead ignorance 1 and what, will you have me anfwer them, when as I am fully informed by them, and have gotten full knowledge by them > (hall I anfwer againft my information, and difpute againft my knowledge of your truths ? you even here contradict your felf, and your own fpirit and fpeecb $ at it often falls out to them that have fuch fpeeches, and fuch a fpirit of contradiction of others. But if I can anfwer them, and that by Scripture fitispoffi ble, it feetm, or othcrwifc why do you pray rac to do it) then fare you have not rightly informed , but rather misinformed me, and mif- interpreted the Scriptures; and therefore 1 may more juftly fct upon the anfworing them, to inform you better in the knowledge of the truth, and to infirm in you the grounds of yourerrours; which I have done by plain Scriptures, and by Arguments alfo proved by direU and plain Scriptures, rightly interpreted. And now that it is done, I will command my felf to hold my p:acc, and enjoyn my felf filcnce. You ( boldly enough ) prayed me to do it, or elfe hold my peace % and I (kindly enough) have done it, and do hold my peace,I/*.&2.i. It was for Zions fake, that I held not my peace, and for Hicrufa- lems II * " - - - t ....-■,. ■ ... .ii » a^ X n 2 • Snbmijfion and Sttbje&jon to the Word. lemS fake, that 1 did not reft, until the rigkteoufiteft thereof went forth as brightnefs, or rather fome little glympfc brighter by my enlighming, fomefmall ftep farther, by my upholding, orra* thcrby Gods enlightening of it, and Gocto upholding of it; J or not T, but the grace of God it is, by which 1 ant what I ant, 1 ** ' and have done what I have done; to the God of which Grace I do here give up the Glory, in the words of that heavenly Hoft, praifingGod, and faying, Glory he to God in the highefiy and on earth peace, good will towards men, Luke 2. 14. And now return ' ttntothy re{i> O my foul, for the Lord hath dealt bountifully with thee, 8tt. Pfal.116.17. But I muft not thus make an end 5 you, Sir, will not let me return to my reft, or give me a Writ of eafe, until I have confi* dered fome certain Texts of Scriptures, which you have writ- ten out to the full of the words, and left with me, for the con» clufion of your Letter. There is no reafon the Reader ihould be deprived of them, they are fo excellent for the purpofe, and fo p rtincnt to the caufc ; .they come like after-drops, when a ftorm of rain is over. The firft is, Job 6.2^25. "teach me, and I will hold my tongue^ caufe me to underftand wherein I have erred : howforceable (forci- blej are right words ? but what doth your ar granges f arguing) (or Arguments) reprove ? do ye imagie finugincj to leprove words ( Why do > ou leave out that which followcih i with your leave, 1 will add n, at belonging to the former^) and the fpeeches of one that isdefperate,which are as winde. This is kindly fpoken of you to me, as c f Jib to Eliphaz his friend, if as truly meant ; and 1 think I rmy fay in juftificatiqn of the truth more than my felf (for wifdom is jujified of her children) that the thing is really done, you are taught the truth here, and caufed to underftand wherein you have erred, and may ho!d> if wil- ling to learn ; therefore hold your peace, as a friend anfwercd, and therein fatiified, without reply, as another friend only que* ftioned, and thereby convinced, was fpeechlefs, without anfwer, Luhi 22. 1 2. But I fufpeft you have not told me all your heart, and do but mock, as "Delilah told San f [on. I fear I mall never teach you, who have learned as much as you dtfire to know; I nay (perhaps) caufe fome other, an indifferent Reader or fo, to underftand wherein you have erred; but your felf, the principal Subf&rjfijn and Subjcftion to the Word. \ q a principal party, I (hall not, Iforcfce, according to i bat Tcxc, Proa. 27.2* the words whereof, tor wane of time, 1 have not wrictcn o t. Nor will you hold your pace, for all your frying fo, you muA or may, as to any nuten.J or fubftaiuial replica- tion, you can make againfl the truth herein affcrtcd and proved; but you neither wll, nor can hold your peace, as to trivilou* mu'tip'ication of w >rds, impminenr citations, and mif.in- tcrprcta ims *n.l mil- applications of Tcxs, flandcrous calum* niationsof Mincer?, and f he A.-ifwerer efpteially, no more than the dog i before you had heard or rc*d any wet J or fy liable of any argu« ing or argument from me ; Yoa might rather have left them cue for me to have faid them to you > a& now 1 iruli, afer that I have read over and heard your arpuingi and arguments, or ra- ther Quaeres » C^nliderations, Interpretations, without a -y arguing? or arguments in them ; What do they reprove : I ide d they reprove Something, everything, thofir things that defcive no reproof but they prove nothing, no not thole things that moft needed proof, and which you undertook to prove (which indeed moved and occaiioned me to bj thus large in fctting down the things in conrrovcrfle betwixt uf» by profing, and difproving, ana reproving fometimes, left all the timefhoald be as loft and mif- fpent betwixt us, and no body, nor our (elves the better by this difcoarfe.) The laft words are right words for us both, and very forci- ble to inform me, and reform my imagination, which hath been , so reprove words and fpeeches of one that is defp:rate » (you were very loth to write out thefe words, and good eaule why) which are as wind ; Co are both the words and fpceches of one that is defperate, and foare the rcproo's of fuch words and fpeeches of one that is defperate ; you, out of hope of lear « ning , I, our of hope of teaching i according to that Tcxr, Jer. 17. 9. U Jer em. ij.23. Jht words nhe> eof I nave n:t witteu out jor want of time* Bbb* The icJZ" Submijjion and Snbje&ion to the Word. The other Texts that ycu have heaped up together, and at large tranferibed, arc noihingbuc very Q^akerifms in the end of your Letter, to which Anabaptifrcs will come in the end \ you have here begun, though you are not the tirft. For as it is the fa(hion of Quakers, to g t up into their memories and mouths, all the Texts of old and new Teftamcnr, where any falfc andvic;Ous Prophets are fpoken of, and againft, or any covetous andfuperftitious Pharifcc is taxed and reproved, and to fl j p them in the face of every Minifter they meet withal), though never fo impertinently and inconiiderately ; infomuch that one of them very lately being at Churcb, after the Minifter had ended his Sermon, as who preacheth conftantly every Sun- day twice 5 Yea, faid he, this is jult as the Prophet faun, J fa. s6. io. 7hey are all dumb dogs, that cannot bark,, Jleeping, lying dowi^ &c. And juft even fo do you, Sir, firft you tell me of ;frf;;/.5.4. and have now time enough to write out the words at length, and not in figures. Surely thefe are poor, tkey are fool- ilb, for they hpow not the way of the Lord, nor the judgement of there (their") God. The which is fpoken of the ignorant and pcrverfc people aanongft the Jews, the Prophet complains of, like as wc Minifters may of many fuch amongft us, your felf not excep- ted ; and I commend you for your fit and pertinent, and even Quaker-like application of it, to us the Minifters of England, whom you know to know the way of the Lord, &c. and there- fore apply it againft your own fcience and confcicncc, to Minifters » which is fpoken ontly to the People by the Prc« phct. The next is, Micah 3.5,1 1,1 2. Neither here is there to you any want of time, to write out all the words : Thus faith the Lord, concerning the prophets that make my people to erre, that byte (bite) with their teeth, and cry, Peace ; and he that putteth not into there ( their) mouthy they even prepare war againji them, the Heads thereof judge for reward, and the Frieji thereof teach for hyrt (hire) and the Prophets thertof devine fdivincj for money , jet will they lean upon the Lord, and fay, Is not the Lordamongfl us ? none evil can come unto us. Therefore fha 11 Zy on (Zion) for yomr fakgs bi plowed as a field, &c. What if there were in the State of Ifrael both Civil and Ec> clcfiaftical, fuch corruptions as arc mentioned in thofe Texts, Snbmijfion and Subjection to the Word. j n 5 at that time, what rcafbn or Religion, prudence or confidence, is there in this, to make ufe, and your application of them to our Scate, both of Magiftracy orMiniftry, until you had clea- red the Do&rine and proof of the fame (ins to reign amongft both ? What Prophet do you know makes the Peeplc to crre^ bice with the teeth, and cry peace, to teach for hire, and if their mouths be not filled, to prepare for war ? do you not re- member who it was that faid, And how likg unto him you are- kereiriy doth Job ferve God for nought ? and who faid, 1e are of your father the devil ? he is-the accufer of the Brethren, and a falfc accufer ; we Minifters teach not for hire, and yet we la- bourers are worthy of our hire ; and if it be detained, and ta- ken out of our mouths, the Law is open, they may implead one another, fas I have largely (hewed before J we may file into the arms of the Law, which is no Law of Arms, or War. Bat farther, the word of Micah was that which he faid concerning Samaria and Hierufalemy and (for any thing app ears J the Word in the Text might b: concerning Samariat and not Hierufalemt and then it concerns you more than us, you more and your Pro- phets, for Samaria wat the head City of the feparate Jeroboam and his compzny, the tcnTrib:s who divided from the H >ufe of Vavidt and departed away from Hierufalem and the Temple, and fct up their Calves in fome private ftalls and houfes; and fo ever after continued fcparates, fo that the Samaritans had no dealing with the Jews ordinarily , when Chrift came and lived with them, but kept aloof and apart from the publick Ser- vices of the Temple, 1 Kings 12. &.John^. The third is, Z/tf.3.12, & 15. 0 my people, they which lead the (thee ) caufe the (theej to erre^ and defroy (deAroy ) the way of thy paths. What me an you to beat my people to pieces (pieces) and grind the face of the poory faith the Lord ? Neither here wanted you any time to write out all the words. Bcfidcs, here's excellent good order in your proceedings, from Efay to Mi- cahy from Micah to Efay, by a new retrograde method, or ra- ther your old crab-order, backward and forward, forward and backward. Bjt theft words arc wholly and foleJy dircft;d by the Prophet, to the fecular Powers and Civil Pvulers of the People of Ifrael; the which if you by your bold andprop'ic- tical fpirit, (hall, a? you do here, (or elf: you are quite out of B b b * 2 youf igo &ut?/ff/Jjion aj* ci ^ HujcUion to the Word. your Tcxcs) revile the Temporal Rulers ot our Naiion, with beating Gods people to pieces, and grinding the face of the poor ^ I mu(t refer you over to their Temporal Authority and Jutticc, to chafHfc your inlolcncy and rebellion, according to tbofe Texts, Hxad.22.%% Row 134 the which for wan: of time, I have not wri. eu tn aii the words. Tnc ncx? it, Jer.^. 30 Sc 31. A wmderjull and 'horrible {jfhirm) is commute i in the &nd} the prophets prop' ele j nicely (\A\\jj and ike prieji ^piieit ) bare (b:ar) ride by ibere fchcirj means, an I my people love to have it Joy and what will ye do in the end tbtre;j t F4.il/ wiitten, and ra'ifly applied is all this Tixt. la whar, and which of our Prophets, (tor Co and f ch you make us, and muft grant u', or all your Applications ot the Prophet* ro us, out oi prophets, is vain, impertinent, and inconliltcnt^) I 'ay, which ot our Prophets, and wherein do they prophclie talil, ? we neither foretell or reveal hidden particular thing* to come; iomeofyour Prophets do, asChrilts coming to reign temporally and glorioufly upon earth for a thoufand years, to- gether with the very year of the beginning of his Reign ; and have herein propheficd fa'fly,for the year is palled oi lace where- in Tome of them faid it mould begin. Or if you mean by prophecying, expounding and interpret- ing of Scripture, I will go no farther than your (elf, for a falfe prophet, at the nexe door, (becaufc I am weary with travelling thus far,) than whom, if there be a more falfc Expounder and Intciprcter of Scripture, as I have abundantly declared through- out this whole Tra&ate, I will forfeit all my Commentaries* upon the Bible, into his hands, if he will rcade them, and take them fo into his head, thereby ,by fuch help, to make him- felf a true Expounder and Interpreter of the Scriptures after- wards, As for ourPriefts bearing ru!e9 by their means ; your own eyci, looking about you, may ferve to give your tongue £1 will ngt fay, the lie J an anfwer to the contrary. And for our Peoples love to have it fo j 1 thought you had been better ac- qiainted with the People thin fo, or to fay fo of them, for the People love to have it oth rwifc than fo, that Priclis mould bear rule by any means. And if you love the People no better thanfr, to fay they love to have it fo, they may f likely) begin J>ofitrrws the CoxmAnclzments of men . 797 Son of the People, and VoxPopuU, (I think you undei Hand that word) a Preacher of the Peoples making, and a voice of a Crier in the Wdderncfa, ag«nfi John the Buptili, though your nmc-fakc, and their Children* Biptifm. And tor the-Ulc Glaufc, Ani what wdlye doin the end ? Here1* a Qjxcc indeed* I wh -> have aiUvcred Co miny of your Quaeres ocfore, will not ftmi out tor th 8 oae at I aft 5 b.it w.i! cell you wUit 1 will do in th: cod ("let others tell you whac they will do in thr end } I vvi'.l sow in the end, pray to God, (And I do Co J tha- hs would give u no you a be cer undo -(landing ot his Wurd into your head, aniagr-acer love >f his Minitters into your hear. For (/o end with chuy >u began '.he Tcxc with) * wondtrfull and horr b'echingisco n-nictcd in the Lmdj and by you, fur one anJ a chi;f one, Tone prophets ("but they arc oncly fo exiled by fo ne) expound the Word ol God fa lily, and reviic th;M n^f«o* God fallly, and the Pricfts and Jefuices bear rule Dy their mcanr, and fom: p*opIe love to have it fo ; and whac will you do to the end I 1 hop: you will hive done in the en J» and hold y Mr peace at lal, as you promifed even now by your Surety J '/>, in your fir ft Text ; which you have caufe to d->> l"ft Job mh\dtyo J ol it, and fay, as he doth. Job 18. a> H w hug will h be ere you mjkg an end of word, ? ( words in- deed, and little elfe be/id :*. ) 1 hope you will do fo anon, foe 1 p rceive the nexr Tcxc is your iaft you end with. Mitih.23 4. Foor vf>r) they bind heavie burdens^ and grievous to be bourne (born) and lay them on mens fboulders, but they tbem- fehjts will not move them with one of there (their) fingers ; in vain do they worlhip met teaching for doctrines the commandemenis of men, Match. 1 5. 10. And if ye love we, kgep my commandementSy J inn 1 4 I 5 r~.r Co I have put youc three hit Texts together into one, as being all oiuch as one, that fo I might bring your word* the fooncr to an end. Neither hore wanted you time to write out all the words, even ot three Tuxti together: yet I fee you are as far off from an end, as when you began j for you here fall back again upon your old matter you began withal,, to q ;*rc me about Gomrnand:ments of God, and m:m Tradi- tions and Prescriptions; fay once more out of your former Tcxc, What will ye do in the md? I muft anfwer you from thefe Bbb* 3 Tex^ I Q 6* Of laying burdens and jioakf ltpon the People, Texts, That I mud now do in the end, the fame 1 did in the be- ginning, difcourfc again of the Commands of God, andPre- icriptions of men. But I am rcfolved otherwifc, having got* ten up the (tone to the top of the hill, not to let it roul back, or tumble down again, this would make my labour endlcfs, and my pains infernal, and Hellikc , which are fupernal now, and Heaven-like ; nor will 1 fufTcr you to begin the Bute again, but will force you to joyn iflue, and to come to trial, and fo to an end. In vain, Sir, you will tell me, that we worftip God in vain, teaching for DucVines the Commandemcnts oi men; when as you do not here ( as not heretofore ) teach me, and tell m: what Commandement of man we make, or teach, for a parr of Divine Do&rine or Worfhip. We teach and embrace the Political and Ecclefiaftical Commands of the Supreme Ru- lers over us, as prefcriptive Orders, and dircftive Rules, about rhe external carriage, and outward celebration of the publick D.vinc Service and Woi (hip, to make it the more cemcly and in order (and have not you the fame Collinical and domeftical Orders and R.ulcs about your private Congregations and Ad- n>inlitrations, and fo teach for DocVinc* the Commands of men, and worfliip God in vain, by your Tixc : ) What a va- nity is this in you, to write thus in vain ; and in fine, to (hew nothing of ours in vain, but oncly words in vain of your own 1 So likewife, why do ye not name fome one of thofe heavie burden?, grievous to be born, that we either lay upon the pco* pl,< fh >uld:r?, or if laid by others, we cur felves are not ready to move them with one of our fiagers. As for the old legal burdens and ycke?, of keeping the Law in all its Morals and Ceremonial.*, as to juftincation and falvation thereby, we were, and are fo far from laying them on mens fheu'ders, no not with one of our fingers, trut with both our hands, and not ours only, frm with the hands of the Apoftfet, Atis 15. we do pull them off, knowing that neither our Fathers, nor we, (for cur moul- ders yet are underlaid by them, as well as others J were able to bear them, and to lay no greater burden upon men, than things ncceflary as to falvation, than the yoke and burden of Chrift, of which the one is ealie, and the other light, as Chrift himfclf faid of it, who alfo maketh it fo unto all that undergo the fame, Mattk,i 1.22,30. This isno other than the Gofpel, the Doctrine Of laying burdens and yo al{j upon the People. 1 9 9 Djftrine and Commands of ChrHt, the which, ^shis yoke, tlraweth in all ; and as his burden, bcareth out all E/angclical Graces and DjUcs. which wc Minifters in the Name of Chrifi impofc upon our People, or rather call upon them, to take this yoke and burden of Chrift upon them, and to learn of him, and to pra&ife as he did (things learnabl:, practicable, and imi- ubk.) And thefe burdens and yokes we alfo, *$ yoke-fellow.*, and burden- fellows with our people, we are even with both our hands, and all our hearty, read/ to move, ftir, and lift at, andliftup, as upon our own, Co their th( u'dcrs, bearing our parts, and helping them to bear their parts, in repenting, be- lieving, praying, &c. Co bearing one anorkers burthens , as the Apoftlc advifeth, Gal 6 2. yea with heart and mouth, praying for them , and preaching to them, wc ftrcngthen the weak hand*, and confirm the feeble knees, as the Prophet bids up, l[a. 3 5. 6. by faying to them that arc of a fearfull heart, Be ftrong, tear not, if any faint under their burden, or hold it not fair, or ftind not furc under ir, or grow weary of well- doing, Coloff.6.9. and as the Apoftle again cxhorteth, 1 Thejfal. 5. 14- Wc arc alwates ready to comfort the feeble -minded^ and to fufport therrea\j tni to he patient towards all meny ( as aftivc towards fom:) tor we that arc ftrong ( or ftrongcr than fomc others of our peopl:, 1 may ^y J ought f and fomc of u?, I fay do, or de. (ire to do as we ought)- to bear the infirmities of the yceak^ and not to pleafe our f elves y&om. 15. 1. nay wc cannot pleafe our fclvcs, if we be fuch as wc ought to be , better, I think, 1 am fure, wc cannot plcafc God better, than by bearing the in- firmities of the weak , and helping them to bear their bur- dens. What would you, Sir, have more of us r do you Co much your fclvcs ? arc not you rather of thofe bad Scribes and PhaFifecs, and in their coat and feat, whom you quote and cite againft us r For a Scribe, I think you arc none, or a very bad one, who net oncly cannot write true Englilh of your own, without a Copie, but even when you have a Gopie before you, and write out of the Bible, cannot write the true Engiifh out of that Co- pic, witnefs m:j Gxr.ttixis of your Tranfcripes of thefc laft Texts. 2oo citing of texts without the Words. N.)r arc you a true Scribe > tor whereas at the beginning uf your Letter, and fo all along, when you had time enough be- fore, then ycu did not write out the many Ttx'S yon q tote and cite, about matters in qjeftion and proof, but oncly name the Chapter,and Vcrfr,noWj at the end of your Letter, when you have lef* time, and arc in iror: bafte ro make an end Ccxcufing the former, for want of time,) yc u w ire ort to the full length, all the words of ten or eleven vcrfc*, without any mention nude of, or excufc for want of time : They were not the Pha- rifeeson ly, but the Scribes alio, that were the HypocrireS| in our Saviours time: fo the worij run together » Scribe^ tharifeei) H}fccrites9 And was there notan Hyporrifiein yonr Scrbifm, or the Scribe here fh.wed hiu felt an Hypocrite? Iluvcfaidit, and (hewed ie,it was net wane of time or leafure ; whar then > even want o\ truth and linccr ity, (which you fo much a flume to your fell, or raher prelum? otinycurfjf toomuch.^) For, Sir, ot fifty Texts ot Scripture at leaft alleged by yon in the former part ot yc ur Letter, ot which all had one vcrft?, many two, and feme three verfts, and fome more $ To write out the words of fewer none of them, (whereby the Reacfer, and cfpecially Popular fort might fee howihcy accorded to thereafter in hand, for which they were citcdjwh.n tirnee- nough was before you, and at your own will and plcafureto take, and then towards the end of your Letter to hstieat mcto look them, and ierioufly to wetfhthem, cxcuflng the matter, that for want of time you had not written eut all the words of all the Scriptures, you might have added, fcarce of any at all ; when in the end and laft cla 'fesofycur Letter, when time muft needs therefore be mere wanting to you, by rcafbn your L< tter cornering, was noifd abroad, and long expc&cd, to take fo much time as to ftand, and thy the writing out all the words to the full (a thing different from your fafhion, when you had more time J of lix or (even Text?, wirhout the leaft intimation of want of time,let the next honeft Clerk or Scribe judge, whe- ther there were not fome Legerdemain and Handicraft, if not heart d-cetpt in fuch hand- writing, aid a piece of hypocriti- cal Scribifm, fas alfo Anabap.ifni)or of fcribbling and Ana- baptiz'ng hypocrifie in ir. And Citeing of Texts withont the Word. 2oi And there was another piece of the fame fluff in it befides s for, the former part of your Letter being of matters and points of Divinity in Qjfcftion betwixt u«, it was your policy and hypocriiie, to fct down to your Tcnes and Affcrtions, Texts or Scripture, named and figured by Chapter andVerfc, foto put a fair gtofs and luiire of Truth, for the amufing of the vul- gar people, and deluding them with fuch (h:ws and paints of proo>, you knowing they neither have skill nor will, nor Ica- iurc, nor pleafure to turn to the words themfclvci and weigh them, of which you might have faved them the labour and me alfo ; (but that you meant not, but rather to put me to the pains, wherein you loft your labour and purpofes , for that it is a plcafurc to me to fcarch the Scriptures) if you had written ou: the words into your meets, and folded up them with your Arguments or Expoiicions together into the fame. Bit then there was another feai' or Quakery in it, (for Hy- pocrites arc ever a fraid of difcavery, and Qjakc for fear of it, as the Devils believe, but tremble for the lame fear of being difcovercd in their falfc faith.) For you feared and might well enough, that if you had written out the words of your Texts, and fet them down together, or by y oar Opinions and Expofi- tions; people muft needs . fee and rcadc both together, and fo comparing the one with the other, the words of the Texts ci- ted, with the words of j our Tenets aflcrted, they might efpy anddifcern ("as an ordinary underftanding may do) the imper- tineii. y of the one to the other, yea the contrariety of the mat- ters in them. And truly this was, and is a notable piece of Pop:ry and Jc* fuitifm, to keep the people as much as may be, from the words of the Scripture; for tne words of the Scripture arepure9 en" lightning the eyes* but peoples darknefs is beft for their devotion, they know and fay : Therefore indeed was I the willinger to look into every Text cited by you, that fo 1 might prefent un- to the Reader whomfocver, the Textf of Scriptures in words at length, and no: in figures, (33 1 fa id before, if I remember well) and fo giving him a plain outfight of the words, He may come to a clearer infighc of the fenfe, and better difcern what itproveth or proveth not : A good way to disfigure anoncly Ccc* Text 20 7 Citing of 'i exts without the Words, Text fcribc, and to revcrfc and decapitate, a vcrfe and Chapter Hypocrite. Bat there is more of the faTie cloath, your Linfic Woollic hypocrifie here, at the end of your Letter ; for ufually he that plaies the Hypocrite in the beginning, works the Hypocrite in the end, and turns to be of a merry, a very one ; when you were engaged to prove and fortifie your Tenets as hitherto, you oncly fet down Chapter and vcrfe, but not the words, why fo ? you could not ftand about writing them down for want of time, no no, that was not the caufe, for being but newly begun, k was free to you to have taken as much time as you would : was it not rather for want of truth, and out of a- bundance of fubtlety and policy, left the Reader finding Gods words, and your words in the fame place together, might the caller at one view fee the diftance, and diflonancy of the one from the other, and fo perceive the weaknefs of proof in your allegation? But now that you are rcfolved in the end, f for a fr'endly farewcl) to reprove, yea to rcvilc,and reproach the true Church of England, and the true Miniitcrs thereof, and now in the foot of your Letter, without any foot, or ground, unlcfs the footofPrtdiy (like as you did the fame in the front of your Letter, without any front or brow, but that of Brane) to trample under your unclean, and ftinking feet, the fwcer, and precious Sons of Siott, (like as you doffed th«m before with yourbrafen, and impudent forehead) it ftenis now at the latr terendof your Letter, you can findetime enough (though it be high time youfhould have done two hour?, and two meets ago) to write out fully the words of fix or (even Texts, fpoken of fomc falfe, and erroneous Prophets, yea, and of fomc cor- rupt Judges, and Magistrates, yea, and fomc ignorant, and fottifh people, fome thoufands of years fi thence, and to apply them to the learned, pious, and laborious Miniftcri of England^ very foolifhly, impertinently, inconsiderately > yea very wick- edly, malicioufly, devilliftJy. Oh here you are very cxaft, and diligent to write out all, and the very words, that your pro fell tcs reading here, may learn the Scripture phrafes and words, and get them by heart, and have Citing of {Texts without the Words, q 03 have them ready in their mouths, as Shimei hid theftoncsin his hand* to caft them at David, a man after Gods own heart, and to afperfe,{land;r, and bequaker the Miniftcrs of God, who are fuch according to Gods will, as they pan": by them,, or meet with them 5 Rtmember (Lord) the reproach of thy fervant%% how we do bear in our bofoms the reproaches of the mighty people : Wherewith thine enemies have reproached, 0 Lord, wherewith they have reproached the footjlept of thine Anointed, Pfal. 8?. 56. Why did you not write out a thoufand Texts more, word for word, even all in the Bible, that mcniion any fin or vice, ofanyNuion, any erroneous or prophanc pcrfon, of any place there recorded , and make application of them all to the Church of England, and the Minifters there of ? This would have made the heap of your ftones the bigger, and fo would have hcaprd up more wrath for you, again!} the day of wrath, for your (peaking evil of Dignities, and reviling Orders; and efpecially for your teaching vulgar people, errors, confufions, as to renounce their firft Biptifm, and reproach their Preach* ing, and Baptizing Miniftert, and that in Scripture Language, and Phrafca which they learn of you, and fuch as you, who writ; out the Texts, and the words too, when you wrcft Scripture to the vilifying of Minifters, and you want no time, nor malice for the doing of it, to put fuch words into your peoples eyes, and ears, and mouth : but when you arc to wrcft Scriptures, for the juftifying of your errors, then you cite the T.xt onely, but write not the words, for want of time, and truth too. and fo feed th:ir fenfes onely with figures, and num». bers onely, fending them away to fearch out the words, for their fatisfying their underftandings, as the Egyptians did tht Israelites to finde out ftraw, for their burning the Brick, * But I remember your laft Text you cited, wherewith you think, you have hit us home, was that off th? Scribes and Vba- r i fees Jay ing heavy burdens uponmens,or the pccp\tijhoulders,and wot moving them, with one of their fingers. I have put by the blow, as of all the other your Texts alleged againft us, fo of this, and the Scribifmof thefame,and have made them ti> recoil- back & fly in your own face,becaufc you ovcrchargcd,and had no skill to charge aright : you hold as great, if not a greater correfpon- Cc c* 2 dency 204 Things laid upon chrijiians notntcejjary^ are burthens. dencywkh the Phariices, than the Scribes; Few of you arc Scribes, more are Phariftes: for you arc like unto them in your name, the word Phari ee figni'yirg S.parate, fas for' mcrly I faidjj fo in y©ur corrupting, and lalfe inreipretmg of Scriptuie(this I have (h:wcd throughout thi? DHcourfe} fo in your high ct nccipt, of your own rigbteoumefs and holincf?, fthis you manifeft in y*ur fcornful, and fupcrci'ious loci, g and fpceclu?,) fo in your comparing the Land to make you Profclice?, and ambit'ons ferking the people, and their ap- plaufc(thi8 ail men fee, and you will notdem)l adde laftly, f which titles the wonder, that prople run aft.rycu) in yot.r laving heavy burthen?, and grievous to be borne upon the Qiouidcrs of men and women. This latter, is the thing, I will (hew out off, A£!,i$t where ver. 5. 'there arofe up certain of the Sett of the fharifees which be* Ikvsd, or profefod Jefus to be the Media*, faying it was needful ioCircumcife \\.e newly converccd Brethren, &c. the matter is decided in the I o. ver. :8. ver. Now therefore, why tempt you Gsd? who put a yok$ upon the neck^of the Vifcipks, which neither our Fathers, nor we were able to bear : And it fs erne d good to the MolyGhojt, and us, to lay upon you, no greater burden, than thef& neceffary things, &c. Ot of which I gather, snd deduct this one General Propofiiion (leaving out the particular of Gir- cumcifion ) Thiir.g?, laid upon ChriOhns or Difciple;, more than nec« {Tir ry, ace a burden and yoke, and feemeth not good ro the Holy ©hoft, but is a tempting of God. Joyn we ifTic now in brief. H.re the Pharifees of the old fcparr.tion faid, it wag ' need'U'l to Circumcise the new converted Chirftiansor Dif- ciplcs 5 and you of the newer feparation fay, it if needful to re Baptiz: grown, and profeffing Chriftians or Difciples, up- ou a particular confefiion of their Faith ; arc not you now agreeable to the Pharifees, in laying on a burden, and a yoke, upon the necks, and flnuldcrs off the Difciples and Chriftians ? But, how do I mew this latter, to be a burden or 5 o\t ? why, from the Proposition here, becaufc thj re* Baptizing of Chriftians or Difciples, who were Baptized formerly in their In- Anabapatijis lay fuch aburthe»9 namely Rebaptization. 205 Infancy, is more than needful or nccefTary 5 and that ic is fo, my whole laft part of this Difcourfe, which now I am finifh* ing, hath amply Demonstrated; yea, your own Rule given tomeatfirft, doth joyntly atccft the fane, the which is this, of all things neceffary to Salvation, the Scripture hath cither a Command or an Example, or both. Now fh:wme for that your prattife, any Command of God , ExprcfTe, or Impli- cate, or by Gonfcqnence, for fuch your re Baptizing 5 Or any Eximplc of any grown perfon or Chriftians, formerly Bap- tized fo re-Baptized ; ifyou cannot, hold ycu your peace (they arc your own word*>) I will fp:ak you a Pharifee, laying up- on mens necks, and Shoulder?, a yoke, and a burdens and moreover by doing fo, a tempter of God, and doer of that, which fcemed not good unto the Holy Ghoft, and the A- poftles. Again , for you to require of Infants born is Covenant with God, and of Parents in Covenant with God, an extert nal confeflion, or profefllon of Faith, before you will put them under the initial Seal of that Covenant, and in the mean while to with hold this from them, until! they (hall do that, is a patting a yoke, and burden upon their necks and moulders, eo hinder them in their Chriftian progreff:; it is to tempi the Lord, and to put him upon other means for Infants Salva- tion than Baptifm, and its a doing of that, which feemcth not good to the Spirit, and the Apoftlcs afTcmbled, and de- termining the afe in a holy Synod, for, that it is a requiring more of Infants, than is neceffiry or needful for their Bap- tifm. Yet once mors: Th: leading of grown Chriftians, Bapti- z d before, into fome deep Pond, and therein re Baptizing them, plunging, and holding them (omc while there under wai ter overhead and cars,body and cloaths too,is a yoke upon the neck, and a burthen put, and laid upon the head and moul- ders, heavy and grievous to be borne, efpcciallyof the aged, infirm, and fickly, and a doing of more than is neceffary un- to the administration of Baptifn, unfecmly, and fuperfluous if not ridiculous,and f° more than feemeth good un to th: Ho" lyGliofl* aad th: Apoftlcs mctinCounfcl, yea it is an temp » Ccc* $ ting 2 q 6 Texts of Scrip turefor the Ambaptifis to confider of. ting of 6od, (and fomc, as I have heard, have fickned and died foon after thereupon J of which I (hall difcourfe at large, in my Narration,8c cenfurc of 4 late dipping which followeth. Now fee, Sir, by this, whether wc Minifters of the Church of England, or you Separates from the fame, be like to ihc Pharifces. And fo I have retorted, all your Texts, and returned them to you again, to apply them to your felvcs, or to apply your felves to them. I (hall therefore oncly give you the like friendly farewel at the end of my Letter, as you gave me in yours, namely, a few Texts of Scripture to confider of, and fcrioufly to weigh , fome for your fclf, and others, that take upon you to be Preachers of the Separation , to confidsr of, and that not (lightly as you ufc : Numb. \6. 11, and 12. iChrou. 26. 18. ^.23.21531,32. tGormh. 11. 13, 14, 15. 2 tint. 3. 5, ^7, §,9. lit. 1. 10, and 11. Heb. 5. 4, and 5. 2 Pet, 2.18, 19. 2 Fet. 3. 16 Some for your followers,and others that hear you,aRd(if any of my people be amongft them) for them alfo to confider of, and that not lightly 2 Chron, %6.\%ii6.Jerer>h 2. 13. Mattb. 14. »3>24,25,26.M^i2. 38,39, 40. Luki 12. 1. with Mat* 16. 6,and 12. Rer.io,Ii. But we are bound to give God thanks for you, Brethren* and Nighbours, and Pa- riihioncrs, (and your felvcs arc bo'ind much more to do the fame to God ) for that he hsth called you unto the belief of the truth by our Gofpel, fand fomcthingalfo, by this my An- fwer to you) 2 Tbcffalonians 2. verfe 14. therefore Brethren, and Neighbours, ftand faft, and hold the Traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our Efiftle , verfe 15. Now our Lord Jefus Chri(i himfelf , and God even our Father* which hath loved us , and hath given us everlajiing confoUtion and good hope through grace, comfort and ftablifh you in every good word and work, verfes 1 6^\y. And now alfo Brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of bis grace, which is able to build you up, Adit 2D. 32. Confider what I fay, (and* have did J and the Lord give you understanding in all things* 1 Tim. 2. 7. Let every foul, that is undemanding, be fubjefr to the higher powers of the wordy and captivate every thought to the obedience of the truth ; Let every Saul who is ignorant admit of the light of the Word and Truth, to fhine round about him, that thefcales, by the Miniftry of Ananias, may fall away from their eyes, that in feeing they may fee, and under- fiand the truth of all the matters and myiteries of Salvation, Ads 9. 15. But if any tnan be ignorant (and wHIbcignorant^) let him be ignorant, and ft ill be ignorant, 1 Cor. 14. 58. Oiy Let them bear and fay , ( reade and (ee ) It is trutb} If a. 45. verfe 9. And fo Sir, becaufc r will be anfwerable to you in all things, 1 do now fubicribe my felfV as in relation to my Matter and Lord Jefus Chi ift. His, the leafrof his Servants and Miniftcr*. not worthy to be called a Servant and Minifter of Chrift ; fo in reference unto you my Antagonift. and Opponent , Your, the greatcft of your friends, worthy to be called a friend of yours, (Tor, am I therefore become jour enemy* hecaufe I tell ym the truth i Of the love ofChrifi Jejks and the Brethren. a 1 1 truth > Gal.+i6 .) Wton you hav? tried all your Brethren and Fricndf > Truth will be your belt Friend * and your beft Brother will be feffiy Watts. From Muckleigh's P-irfonage, July the I. 1656. Now I proceed from a Scribe and his Letter anfwered,and a Pharifle or Separate chur- ched, to a hypocrite or Dipper fprinkled : but firfl: of all to be queftioned and cate- cliiied j and fo to the Narration of a dip- ping , to be cenfured , according to my Proraife in the Title and Frontifpieee of this Trcatife. Oncly firft, Courteous • j Courteous %eader-l) Muft defire of thee, that, in the read- ing over (if fo thou art intended) This Narration of a Dippping, with a Cenfure thereupon , which fol- loweth now , Thou wouldft not mind a Paffage , or Paragraph of the Former Epi/iie to thee, which goeth before the Anfwer and Inftru&ion of a Scribe, and his Letter-, as wherein 1 apologized for my omitting to cite and call into the feveral Points I handled, the venerable Tejlimonies of the ancient Doctors and Fathers of the Church, in their own learned Languages : This I excufed unto thee, partly becaufe I was confined and tyed up by the Scribe and his Queres, onely to Scripture Commands and Examples fox my Anfwer$ and partly for that I intend- ed my Anfwer (would go no farther, then in a recipro- cal , and interchangeable Letter returned unto him, who firft occafioned and provoked it. Though after- wards by reafon of the larger extent of my Anfwer then I expe#ed;. The Desk refufing atranfcription of * it, To the %eader. it, to which I had offered it , I was even compelled to make my refuge unto the Preffe , for an Impreflion of the fame •, otherwife all the labour muft be loft on both fides , the Queres and Letter unanfwered, the Scribe uninftru&cd , the Pharifee uncharged, and Truth unvindicated , as to , and by my fcif. This being done,the Anfwer finifhed,difmiiTed,and fent away for the aforefaid purpofc , There fell out, and was pra&ifed in my Pariih, and (it may be for the more affront to me)at a houfe of mine there, This Dip- ping of two new sifters in a Pond of the Yard : The which being in publick, upon the Lords- day , and be- twixt the Morning and Evening Worfhips,drcw away much people thither , and was difcourfed of by many iriouthes, and fo famed about in thefe parts, that I re- folved (and could do no lefs) to get a full Narration of the bufinefs , and to pafs my cenfure upon the fame. And fo having firft preached it down in my Pulpit to my own Panfh , as a New bufinefs of ill confequence, I next have written it down in my Study , to thee the Reader , and have fent up alfo , this my cenfure, after the former , my Anfwer , to be Impreffed or Im- printed together, into the fame Tractate, as hand- ling both of them, matters very agreeable and con- fonant. /"""So then here intending the Preffe , and having now no confinements otreftraints upon me, I have taken my full Liberty to produce and bring in much of the Leaned Antiquity , and to write out , and tranferibe their weighty Words and Speeches,in their own Lan- guages, as many of them as I had by me, for the fuller Confirmation and firmer AtteHption of this my cenfure upon To the Trader. upon chat Dipping •, that it was ,and is, as I have faid,a Nw buftn'fs, and a very Novelty. Yea this I have done3as for the convincing the Ana- baptifts their Dipping, and Immerging Biptifm ( fo called) to be of Novelty *, fo for the Cot firming the OrchodoXjtheirS/^/wir/'w^and Afperfing Baptifm(as ic is) to be of 4n?iqwt]Joy the evidences of chc ancient Fathers and Doctors , brought forth and fhswed on both fides : and fjrther I have afcended up to the Htgbeft Antiquity of a\\, even to the Ancient of dayes, and the ?rirnogen:t of every Creature, and have (pro- bably at Icj ft) fhewed, that Chrift Jefus himfelf ma- nifcfted in the fl (hw -s but After fedoi Super fufed with water, and not D/pptd and Immcrged under the water (certainly not in their wiy and manner) at his Ba- prifmvby S fibn the Prime biptift , nor other Chri- ftians, after him, by S. Peter and the other Primitive Bapti^ers. And as to rat fi thefe things, fo (learned Reader ) I have done thus much, to grat.fie thee, and to re/re/h chee with the rare deltcac es of thefe An- cients, afcei true I have well nigh weaned thee, if not cloyed thee wuh the courfe Ordinary of my Mo- dernefs. Oncly, I wonder at the Iron- brow , and Brazen- foce of novel Impudency , and New- light 9 that whereas ic is every Seventh day at leaft , in its Chimney- houfe Conventicles, prating againft the Old, Laudable, and Ancient Practices of this our , and other reformed Churches , it dares pre- tend to Ant -i quit y , ( fo contradicting it felf ) and glory ot it in this point , of their Immer- ging and Dipping 9 ( calling it the Good old way ) who fcorVit 3 and feoff at the fame , and * z all To the Reader. all Old Light, in their other Tenets and Opini- ons. I fay no more to thee then what feb faith, 32.7. Dayes jhould fp(aky and mtdtidude of years jhould teach mjdom. And fo 1 2. 1 2. with the Ancient is wifdom, and in length of dayes undemanding. And laftly , what Solomon fj th, Remove not the Ancient Land-Mark which thy Fathers havefet, Prov. 22.28. So fare- weli3 and Fear ill. Tb e i&i£?s&&&&i JV ■W*-*' ■*•: ■■*>. ia^ir -«&.*&*.;*> 77^ Narration of their Dipping in a Tondof Much-leighes. AFtcr Supplication within a Houfc near the Pond , for Gods Prefcnce and Blefsing , the two Women , or Sifters, gave an ao count of their Faith,and others, a teftf- mony of their Life j and after fupliea^ ting again,thc two VVomen,or Sifters, did privately ftrip themfelves in a Chamber, and put on other cloathes, that fo they might have their own dry to put on^ again. And fo they C2me to the Pond , wherein the Brother, who is fct apart by Fafting and Prayer of the Church, to adminifter the Or- dinances^ ood in the water; the Wo-* mcn,or Sifters,going into the water al^ fo, The Narration of their Dipping fo above the knees, (but the one afore the other about a minute^) He took them one after another, faft by the cloathcs about the (boulders, aid fpake the words acccording to the Inftuution, feverally to each of them, at the inftant time, immediately be- fore the Dipping, and fo dipped them feverally ail over head and eais^ body and cloathes, (having firft tyed their cloaths together with a firing, about and above their knees) He dipped ei- ther of them but once, and then railed them up again, and fo they went a- gaiti to the Houfe and fhifted thcnv ielves in a Chamber by themfelvcs, with the help of fome women j and they fupplicated again, That God would encourage their Souls, and in- creafe their Faith, and the reft of the day wasfpcnt in prayer,preaching,and participating the Lords Supper. The in a Pond at MuchJeighes. The Jtyrrator hereof ( to whom, being an Attor and Abbettor in the bufi- Kefs, I wrote for a true and full iaforma* tion , becaufe I would not talg it upon report, from Spectators and Lookers on onely) added theft words to me. I am fort j to hear you call it a J\(ew bufnefs,for it is older then your Spring livg of Infants, though indeed that hath been fo long praHi fed generally, that this Old Good Way feems now a new Thing : And no wonder, for we read that the Song the Saints fing for their deliverance out of Antlchriftianifm , is termed to be, as it were, a newfong, Rev. 14.5. And no won* der though the oldTraBices of the Saints be, as it were, a new Thing to the World, and unto their Leaders. I am glad to hear you acknowledge that "Baptising is TUpping^ then Sprinkling u not 'Baptising ; we confefs that every "Dipping u not "Baptising, for I may Dtp my The ISIarration of their Dippingj&c. my *Dog, but not *Bapti%e or T>ip him in the 3\Qameoftbe Father, Son, and holy gho/i. Reader, Thou haH heard the 2\(ar* ration and the Addition, now read on>and hear the Cenfure, and its %eafons ; but having to deal with Crabbed Felloms, ejpecially here in this Toint^for they go backward here (which they do not elje* where) to Antiquity, and the (food Old Way) I muft, and therefore will begin at the laft and lower Words , and fo go backward alfo (though upwards') that fo I may follow them and overtake them, which elfe I cannot do. THE &< THE DIPPER SPRINKLED- y*// B*fii%ing u vot Viffiwg. I SIR, OH Ou have no caufc to be glad at my acknowledg- ing that Baptizing U Dipping , (unlefs with Demotrittu you can laugh at any thing you hear) for then I muft have faid, All Baptising i* Dipping, which I did not, as who know that but fome Baptizing U Dipping and/em* Bapti- zing u 4 fprinkling : Baptifm being both in the true nature of the thing, and native fignitfcation of the word, but an ablution And wajbing with water, which may be done either way, by dip- ping the party in the water , or by fprinkling water upon the party. And you have as little caufeto be forry at my calling your Dipping a net* Bnfmefs , (unlefs with Heraclitus you can weep at every thing you hear) I called it fo indeed, and {hall here now make the Calling true, asin word, fo in deed-^ fofarisit from being older then our fprinkling of Infants , that your felf helpech it forward, faying, That thin hath been ft Lng pratlifed verier ally , that yoxr good old way (of Dipping) fetrns now a new thing > It feems fo to you, it is fo, to me. You make me in the meantime no whit forry but glad , to fee you moved fomewhat upon the charge of a new thing orbti- A a a a Jtnefe ; The Diffing u a new Bufinefs. finefs : Are not all your things now new ? and your whole Bu< finefs, is it not new, a new nothing ? This will do well indeed (if real) and will be a credit to you ( if creditable ) to come out of your new Lights into our old Light j toforfike the Novelties of your Scribe, and em- brace the Antiquity of the Scripture : fo you would be thought ' to do, by alledgingof that Scripture, Rev. 14. 3. Though very impertinently and improperly j For the fong the Saints fing there for their deliverance out of A ntichrifiianifmy (belt Co) is not ter- med there to be as it were a new fong, by the world and their lead- ers, by way of reproach or fcand#liz,ing imputation : but by the Church mid its Saints, theviclory of the Lamb and its followers ;- and the fong which they fung for it, is termed a, new fong, bf way of Renown, or magnifying Reputation • as elfwhere the Scri- pture fpeaketh and meaneth by the fame phrafe of a new fong, Ffalm 3 3 . 3 . and Pfalm 44. 4. You apply it (a* if the Lamb and his Company, or their vi&ory and deliverance, were wrong- ed and miftermed by fome , as it were a new fong) to me for vilifying or mifcalling your Dipping, a new Bufinefs. Thus, in- ftead of a Leader of the world, (as you write and would make me) againft your meaning and will, you make me a follower of the Lamb ; who though I bear a part in the fingingof that glorious newftng, yet ft II may and (hall fing my old Jong and laying of your inglorious new Thing and Bufinefs , namely your late Dpping amongft us. See how foon you have profitted much in thcfchoolof one Tj- ranntu, Alls 19.9. (fo but the other day, you faid and thought you were under the [pirit of Bondage) and what is the vertue and efficacy of this your new Dipping, how quickly it hath made you a right and pcrfed Scribe , and taught you the art and skill, and pra&ice too of your mafler, which is to pervert Scri- pture, wrefling it to your own ill intents and purpofes, and worfl- ing it againft its own good meaning and fenfe. For all this that you have cited here, The accufation of a new thing, may juftly and manifeftly ftill lie againft you,for your dip- />/»£, whilft there goeth along with them and their conquering, the Revelation of a new fong, or that new fong of the Revelation. But I muft remember, that I have entitled tru\ to be a word. and work of Catcckifing the Dipper , as I have Inflrutted the Scribe : The Dipper a new BaftUer^ no Mwifter. Scribe : And inftead of many Quseres which I received, I (hall give but thefe four Queftions. . & i . Was not the perfon dipping a new thing ? 2. perfons dipped, a new thing. 3. Place where, a new thing. 4. And the very Dipping it fclf for the ^^rnj a new thing? If either of -them be fuch, then let this be my firft Ca- techiftical Quare to you, of the perfon Dipping , and tell me, or (hew me, QjKire 1 . What warrant you have from any precept, or ex- ample in lacred Scripture, or fucceeding Primitive Antiquity, for one Lay-Brother (no Minifter called or ordained) to be the 'Dipper or Baptizer of another, or any ? Paul indeed baptized Crijpus, and Gains , and the hou/hold of Stephanas, I Cor. 1. 14, 16. The fame Paul baptized the jay lor , and all his , and a certain woman named Lydia, Alls 1 6. 14, 3 3 . Peter baptized Cornelius and his houfsold ', At~ls 10.48. So Ananias baptized Saul, Alls 9. 18. Philip baptized the people of Samaria , and Simon the force- rer Alts 8. 12., 13. And the three thoujand fouls which were ad- ded unto the Church, were baptized by the twelve Apoftles,with the a-ffiftance of the feventy two Difciples, Alls 2. 38,41. And fo the Commiflion was given by Chrift to the Apofiles} as of Pre., ching, fo of Baptizing, Mat. 28. 19, 20. And fo it was from the beginning : The firft Baptift was John, who baptized sM them of fade* and ferufalem> and Chrifi him- f elf, and his Difciples. Now John I know, and Philip I know, and Ananias I know, and Paul I know, and /Vfr I know, and the twelve ApoftlesI know , and the feventy two Difciples I know , and the feven Deacons I know, that they were fervants of the mofl High, fent and appointed of God, to Jbew unto us the -way of falvation, and to minijhrthe holy Ordinances , Alls 16. 17. Alls 19. 15. But who are ye ? Ye that go for Dippers ? And whereas it is faid, that Peter commanded them to be bapti- zed, it feems, that together with Peter, fome other Brethren alfo prefent there, either aflifted in bringing water, or (it may Aaaa 2 be) The Differ a ntf» Baptt^er, m Mtnifier. be) in pouring on water, or afperfing therewith, the houfhold of Cornelius : but at the command and call of Peter, and God chiefly, who had baptized them before with the holy Spirit* Be- fides, they, the Brethren, were fome fuch of the Difciples, who had before an ordinary calling to fuch like work-, if not, here they hau extraordinary to this in prefent. Thus^A* i. -J. the Pharifces (I wonder how the Scribes hypocrites keptoif, for if, asufually they had been here jovir- ed, then you and yours had been here fetcht in) in their fcru- phng at John, refolved the point , faying unto him, Why bapti- ze]} theft then, if thou be not that Chrifi, nor Eliaty nor that Pro- phet. And at the 3 3 . verfe fuhn fheweth his Authority, namely his Million < He that fent me to baptise with wafer : The Baptift was of Gods fending j nay, when Johns difciples came and told him , faying, Rabbi, He that wo* with thee beyond fordan, to whom thou barefi n itnefs, behold, the fame baptiz.eth , and all men com* to him. fohn anfwered and [aid , A man can receive nothing, ex- cept it be given him from heaven, fchn$.26, 27. So giving us a rule in general krft : No man can (lawfully) baptize, except he be authorized from above, that is, fent of God. Soar 34 ver. he applieth and rxpoundcth , in the particular of hi<> felf, as before, fo here of Chrift , He whom God hath fent fpe*ket* the words of God. And thus the Author to the Hebrews, Chap 5. ver. 4. giveth both the fame Rule in general •, No man taketh this honor unto himfelf , but he that is called of God , as was Aaron : alfo maktth the application in particular to Chrift, ver. 5. So alfo Chrifi glorified not himfelf, to be made an high priejt , but he that fatd, Thorn art my fon • he faid alfo, Thou art aprieftt&c. To circumcife was a ward of the Legal, and to baptize, of the Evangelical Keyes •, and they belonged onely to the Priefts and Apoftles, and their fucceflbrs in both admi- miniftrations. So then, ftrlll &sk the Que&\onyfrho are ye, who take upon you (I hope not) to call over them which have evil fpirits, the .name of the Lord, (faying, We adjure you by fefiu, yet) to call ovef them whom ye think to have the holy Spirit , The name of the Father, the Sen, and the holy Ghrfl , laying, We baptize you in the namdofthefe. §. 1. Youranfweris, They are Brethren fit apart ty faffing and Of fe far at ion and calling tot hi miniftery ofBaptifm. and grayer of the Church yto adminifter hdy Ordinances. But if this would do it, that they are Brethren, and that they are fee apart \ why doye not all, at times, become Dippers ? tor ye arc all fcparaieJBrethren j there is but one letter lefs (and as little literature) in a brother feparate then, or as in a brother /rr apart. jAnd if truly fet apart to adminifler holy Ordinances , why do they not give over, as inordinary, their iecular Trades and Lai- call Callings, and wholly or chiefly tend upon fuch Admini ft ra- tions unto which they are fet apart: forfo is boch the precept and example of the word you fo mnch pretend to. Separate me Barnabas and Saul for tbervork^vchereunto I have called tht>m> Alls 13.2. Give thy felf whoHy unto them, i. e. Reading, Do- drine, Exhortation, and the Gifts given thee, iT/w.4. 15. It is not meet we -Jhoutd leave the Word of God and ferve Tables, Acls 6. 2. and much Jefs Stalls. §. 2. If jet apart, by, or of whom I pray? by, and of thr Church you fay : and what C hurch do you mean? fure your awn fmall private company of Believers- orbe-youa great publique mwlticude of chem. And now are you not again out 01 the goo >io la way ? yes fure-, for Chnit never gave unto uch. a Church, no not to the whole community of people Believers, as Believers, any fuch power and authority, to fet apart* Brother or Brothers, to admi ifier the Ordinances of Chrifi , as Preaching, Baptizing -, but onely to fuchashimfelf cfrofe out of the Church and Believers, to be Guides and Paltors-of the fame. So of old , Ephef. 4. 1 1. He gave fome Apoftles , and fome Prophets ,. and fome Evangelifis , and fome Pafiors and Teachers 3 and' it folloWCth , for the Chtt> chits perfecling and edify ingySic. (not to the Church to ordain and fet apart) the Authority is Chrifts to give, not the Believers. And Chriit (of old too) gave the Keyes and the power of them (one part whereof is this fetting apart of perfons to the adminiftringof holy Ordinances) to Peter and the Apoftles, as bearing the per- fons of the Paftors and Guides of the Church, Mat. 16. 19. and not as reprefenting the Church of Believers, (for then thefe alfo muft have power to binde and looiein earth and heaven by Cenfures, fehn 20. 23. as well as the Apoftles and Paftors, »nd fo women and children may comein for itJ.as.-Believe-rs.)- 1 sou Id The manur $f Crdaimd^ and how. I could never fee yet, that the Miniftery of the reparation, had any reparation to the Miniftery, juft and right according to the good old way •, onely a kinde of popular Democratical defignation they have, but no authoritative or official Ordma- tion, which is Ariftocracical. But why do you not fpeak out to the full? Was he your brother fet apart of the Church? i.e. your felves the Brethren to adminifter the Ordmancerof ChriO-, and was he not alfo authorized to give Orders? (or do you mean thefe alfo orders by them Ordinances) how elfe will you be given to preaching, or be a gifted Preacher ere long, if not already ? Nay, when your Church and the Brethren did fet him apart to the Miniftery, did not your Church and Brethren give him Orders and Ordination to the purpofe , that lb he might give back again to your Church, and any of theBrethren, Or- ders and Ordination j and fo make yours a very orderly Church indeed, in running round in a ring until you be turn-lick and giddy-headed. But enough of this, having fpoken largely of it in thelnftrudion of the Scribe. § . 3 . Set apart of the Church, but how I ask ? You fay by fafiing and prayer, and this was all it feems. And why not alfo, by Laying on of Hands, according to the good old way, laid open and plain in the Text before cited , Atls 13.3. and tracked or traced by St. Partial Tim. 4. 14. and 2 Tim. 1 . 6. Thus of old they , the holy Spirit, and the Apoftles did fet afi.rt Brethren to the adminiftring cf the Ordinances , and this of old, namely the Laying on of Hands alfo, was a note of confer- ring minifterial power and authority, as a means alfo of procu- ring Ipiritual gifts and abilities. Now the things which God hath jcyned together (in the conftitution and fending out of a Minifter in holy Ordinances) let no man put afvnder, or fet apart Fafl* ixg, Prayer, dnd Laying en of "hands : none do or will, but fuch ashayea fpirit of Diviilon and Separation, an humor of No- velty and Innovation , and therefore 1 do not wonder at it in you. Befides, you had no hands to impofe in fuch a btalinefs, they are too fhort to reach up , and to lay upon the head of a Brother, as to Commiffion or Ordain him, or let him apart, as from God, for the lacred adminiftration of Baptifm : your mouths (hut up by fefting, and your hearts enlarged by prayer, may do well, as to commend and prclent him to God, for his bleiling Lay mens baptizing, in cafes rfnecefity^ what and when. biefling and confirmation of his graces , when fuch arc rightly and duly/* t apart. § 4. Y >u have done now with your fet apart Brother, but there is another matter yet to be done according to the old way-, for they alfo in the 1 3 . Acis 4. fent axay Paul and Bamabat, And fo Rom. 10. 15. How Jhali or can they preach, or baptize, ext ept they be fent. True St. Paul faith y Chrift fent me not to baptise, 1 Cor. 1. 17. (chiefly and primarily) but to preach 5 yec he baptized as well as preached and intimateth that Chrift lent him to do both, as being conjund parts of the Miniftery , Mat. 28. 19, 20. though diftind offices in themfelves., and the one preeminent to the other,at leaftwifein St. Paul. But now you were not in a capacity as to this fending out of a Brother to adminifter this or other publique holy Ordinances^ as he would not take this honor to himfclf, to be an AmbafTa- dour of Chrilt, fo you and your Brethren could not give it unt» him, and fend him forth, for that you muft be fent your felves, before you can fend others to go forth into the nations, Teach- ing and Baptizing. SoChrift himfclf, John 20, 21. As my Fa- ther fent me, fo fend I you. In a word, was, or is your Brothers feparation to administer Baptifm, and other Ordinances, ordi- nary or extraordinary > If extraordinary , then your Church did nothing here, for that is neither of man nor by man^ you did not then fet apart ; If ordinary, then your Church had nothing here to do , as which it felf was never fct apart , or fent out from Chrift and his Authority to fuch purpofe. Thisbeing mz done as yet to you, or him , you may think what you will of your Creature, and admire your Feature- your Brother fct apart Dipper, is ftill in the ftate and condition as your felves, and as before ^ he was for any thing you have done, a Brother, but no Minifter ; a Separate, no Set apart • a Dipper, but no Baptizer -y a Lay Teacher, but no lawful Preacher. And I will tell you what Auftin faith of fuch, and I will tell it you in Latiue, becaufe you underftandit , Si Laic w B apt if- mum dederit , nulla cogentc neceffitate , alieni mumrls eft ufurfa*- tio, lib. 2. centra Barmen, cap. 1 3 . This I defire you to Englifli to your Brother. And becaufe perhaps you were en joyned be- fore your dipping to renounce your Latine alfo as a profane thiogj or dk-fincc your dipping, you may have drowned much of/ 8 Lay mens bapityg, in cafes ofnecepty, what and when. of your Latinc, or drained ic from you, I will give you another faying otTertnllian in Englifh, in his book ofBaptifin : To give Ihtptifnt, is in truth the Bijbeps right t after htm it belongeth to Prieftsand Deacons ^ but not to them without Authority from him received j for ib the honor of the Church, which being kept, prefervech peace : were it not in this refped, the Lai ty might do i he fame, all forts might give, even as all forts receive: But becaufc emulation is the mother of Schifms, Let it content thee (which art of the order of Lay men) to doit in neceflity, when the ftatcof tirnetor place, or per/on thereunto ccmpelleth ■ for thcK u their boldnifs priviUdgcd that helf , vehen the cirexm- ftance of ether wins dancers craved: it. Both thefc learned and pious Fathers yield, even to a Lay man, fuch a one as your Brother or your felf, to baptize, in a cafe or ftate of neceflity • and one of them eniargethit, To time, place, orperfons : I fhall but guefs at the particular mean- ings of them,, if 1 mifs, let who can and will redtiie me , 1 will thank him, for you ( 1 know) cannot if you would i . The cafe of neceflity in ftate of Time*, is when the Chri- stian party unbaptized is in prefent danger of death , and no lawful Minifter at hand, or to be fuddenly procured. 2. The cafe of neceflity in irate of Place, is when Pagans are converted, and* Church there to be planted , and no ordained l^inifter amongft the Converters. 3. The cafe of neceflity in flate of Perfn , I fcarce under- stand, unlefs it be this, When a< he or (he earneftly defireth and imploreth for the fa me, whether by its fpcech, or its need, and there is no Minifter to give it Baptifm ^ here the Lord will have mercy and not facrifice, and men are not to ftand upon this ordination, but the perlbns falvation. Let but your Brother., or your felf, (lay and expeft fuch cafes of neceflity, before you, or he, dip any more, or baptize again, And then though you be not, nor he, kt apart fortheadmini- ftrin^ that Ordinance, but are meer Lay men , you fhall hear nothing from me againft the fame, I affiireyou. But if in a well ordered, and already planted and conftituted Church, and that when there are no fuch cafes or itatesof neceflity, but that lawfully ordained Minifters may eafily be procured, you aid your Brethren will go on liill to dip and baptize, and that publwrjoeTy, Agtm} Rcbaptizifig. publiqwely, being no better ordered or fee a part,then you have related,I (hall fay though again,7V talee too much upmyouye fons of Gad (fori fhall not hold you of the Tribe of Leti, Num.16. yj or Jjfachar rather, couching down between two burthen.^ Gentf. 49. 14. your Laical and Minifterial Callings. And it fhall come to paf> as Zacharius faith, Zach. 13.4, 5. that fuch Prophets /ha /I be a/hamed every one of his vifion , which he hath prophefied : ( and every one of his Divifion that he hath made, and fet a partition ; yea, of his Dipping alfo that he hath miniftred, and Baprif nj and he (halffay (and confefs at laft) / am no Prophet^ I am an Husbandman • for man taught me to keep cattel from my youth. God never ordained me to dip Chri- ftians from my birth. Diftindly, Take this a Presbyter or Prieft, in refped: of his Mir nilterial Character, and Order, I mean onely a facerdotal gift, power, and commiflion) is primarily and principally the pub- lick and ordinary minifter of Baptifm : A Deacon may baptize alfo, and that publikely , fo it be at the appointment of thebi- fhop or Prieft,but a Prieft by his own right may baptize ex offi- cio, as we fay, by vertue of his facerdotal office, even in the pre- fenceofaBtfhop. But a Layman,may not baptize publikely , but onely privately^ neither privately in the prefence of a Prieft or Deacon,but onely in their abfence^ neither alwayes in their abfence, but onely in cafe of necefifcy. Then it hath been permitted ( according to the good old way , and new way a'fo of true Churches) fome fuch times to Laymen to baptize, fo he intend to do that, which the Catholick Church doth , in that kind of adrmniUration, The fecond Catethiftical Q,u to baptize them thereupon: All this,and as much more which you might have alledged of the fame fort brings no ad- vantage to your practice, no age, to your new bufinefs of Re- baptifing the fecond time : for ,that the mentioned above, were their ffrft and onely baptizings, they being fome of them Pagans born, others, aliens from the Covenant of Chrift, adverfe and opposite to ignorant , -at leaftwife,of the Chriftian Faith ; were then firft of all baptized, upon their embracing of it, and never after baptized again. No, not the Black Ethiopian amongft them, was ever dipped the fecond time-, And what is all this, to your Redipping of two Women baptized before in their infan- cy^ being born Chriftians and within the Covenant of Grace andChri{i?Yea more,if the Pope of Pome ftiould come over into .EtfgAf^and turn Proteftanc, or become one of your Se&, afe- parate^ nor we would, nor flhould \ou (of right) baptizehim again, having been baptized before rightly-, as to the Element and Words of Inftitution. Therefore the Ancient Orthodox Church, never Re- baptized Hereticks themfelves , upon their return and rcverfon to the Faith, (who were before baptized j nor the children of Profef- fors, though baptized by Hereticks, cr heretical Miniiters, if rightly according to the Ordinance ) but rather condemned it, and pronounced it a Herefie to hold it , or to pra&ife fo, a Re- "baptization. For the Sacrament of the Eucharift , there is a Quotiefcunqne, & it (hoiild be received as oft of the fame Perfon as may be con- veniently , for that our growth and augmentation in grace , ^2% ought to be-daily and continually, whereof theEuchar.listhe Sacrament : But I never read of above a femel,oi" the Sacrament ofBapt fm, that it fhould be received above once, of the fame pcribn , becaufe our Spiritual Birth and tneifion mbo Gbrift is out once, whereof Bap ifm is the Sacrament. The thing isa&edbut once, and therefore is fignified but once. J acknowledge indeed that it is no where exprefly written, thatbaptifm fhould not be irerated and rece.ved the fecond B b b b 2 time 1 2 Children Chriflenfag, is no Cutting. 2> time, (o its no where faid, there are thre© Perfons of the Deity though the word (of Perfons) is not in facred Writ, yet the will ofGod about the things fignified by the Word , is revealed and expreffed in the fame, io, the Will of God, that baptifm fhould not be iterated , and once baptized fhould not be re-»baptized, or baptized i he fecond time, appears partly out of what I have allcdged. i. That Circumcifion was never iterated , none evercir- cumcifed twice , and Baptifm fucceeds Circumcifion. 2. That there is mention made of an Iteration or often Re- ceiving,the Lords Supper, but not a fyllable of Intimation there orelfewhere, of the like of Baptifm. 3, That in the very Place and Scripture,whereChrift inftituted Baptifm (which yet had been the very proper place for it) there- is no order at all, for rc-baptizing,or iterating baptifm. 4. That among all the many examples of perfons baptized There is not one recorded to have been re-baptized, no not Si- mon tbe Sorcerer ,nor Dem/is theRevolter,not one of the Corin- thians-nor of the Galathians relapfed,but onely were called up- on to Return to the Grace of the Covenant (fealed in their firft • Baptifm) by Repentance and Faith. Ifuppofe the grand reafon of your re-dipping and re-bapti- zing in elder age is this, for that you hold your firft dipping and J baptizing to be vain, Invalide,& fruftrate, which was tranfa&ed * in your infancy (forfo one of your Se& told me the other: day , that when he was a Child he was Chriftened , but he was then alfo but cozened.) As I warned him,fo I wifh you,to take heed unto your way est hat you offend not in your, tongue or. thought, fo, as in either of them to reproach the Living God, or blafpheme his holy and effe&ual Baptifm , by thinking snd calling this a Cozenage, and him a Mocker. Did God cozen the whole Church and People of ' Ifrael v;hen he appointed and commanded their children even but of eight days old to be circumcifed? how then dorh he cozen the Church and people of the Gentils in our Infants baptized, feeing baptifm is the Circumcifion made rtixhot.t h,:nds , Col. 2. ii. Nay, feeing both Circumcifion and Baptifm are the figns, and. fcals of ihat one and the fame Everlsfting Covenant of Grace ; rbey neither are, nor can be any cozenage or fruftrate things,to thej Cbildrtm Cbrijiening^ is no Cozening. T ? the right Partakers of them (until they befruftrated by them- felves,the Partakers,as by Efau was his birth-right, and alfo his circumcifion, and then God is rather mocked and cozened, then a Mocker and Cozener -J but they are valide and of force to the fpiritaal good ends and purpofes of cither •, and therefore being rightly once imprinted ,are of vigour and vcrtue • of frait and efficacy during life, and (o long as the Covenant lafteth, which fe everlafting-, (as I faidj and fo need not to be repeated and re- iterated, but' are often to be revolved, and revived in our mindes , memories and meditation, and the Tenor of the Covenant daily to be ftudied and practifed , -and the Condi- tions thereof on our part to be obferved and performed accord- ingly. Rather your feff , Sir, and your two Sifters were cozened and cheated (atid'never fo much in all your lives as) when } ou renounced that your firft Chriftian Infant baptifm, and received this your fecond novel youthful Dippifm Nor can that be any good reafon of your re-dipping or re- baptizing, your defefr of Faith in the time of your Infancy , or fithence days of age, your Eccefs of fins , fuchas have vacated the gracious Covenant and vitiated a good Confcience. For you muft confider , that the Covenant is fealed in Baptifm , or Baptifm is added to the Covenant on Gods part as well as man?: God promifing there Grace and Eternal life , and man fti- pulating for Faith and new Obedience ■ Though therefore you might or did fly from the performance of your Promlfe, by Hy- pocrifie or Apoftafie , and upon fuch default on your part loft your right and claim of eternal life • God notcvithftanding ftood and ftandeth ftill firm to his Promife on his part , as who never breaketh Covenant with any , nor ever lofeth his right to any party baptizsd by any default made on his fide.- - Thefe things if they be true, as they are moft true,God being not at man that he {hould change and alte- , to what purpofe was it, that you fhould or did ent.-rancw, into a Covenant with God, and reiterate the feal thereof, Baptifm , and fo be re- baptized^nd re-dipped, which was but a will-worfhip of yours, fruit lefs-, and a tradit on of men,need!efs,no where commanded * you of God j no where exemplified to you by thc-men cf God, the faints, 14 Sinners muft retttrn to the Covenant by Repentance, ,j — , — *i , . — — ' This rather you fhould have done as that one and onely neceffary thin« you fhouLdhave repented of your evil ways and works,andfo have returned unto Godwin Covenant already and ftill with you, fealed in your Infant-Baptifm ; (though for- feited on your part, yet not releafed on Gods part ) This you (hould have earneftly pleaded with God , confefiing your fins, and by Faith firmly embracing it , through Chrift your Advo- cate and M^diatour-, Thus you would have fet your former Ba- ptifm on work , and your felf too in performing the conditions thereof, and lo you {hould have recovered and received all the fruits and benefits of the Covenant of Grace, fealed to you by Baptifm in your infancy. This every where in Scripture do the Prophets call upon Covenant-breakers on their part, and his revolting and relapfed people , to repent and to return to their firft Covenant with God, fealed in their Circumcifion, not to. any re-circumcifion as. y ou may fee Jeremy 3.1,12. Hof.z.y.^nd6Ji. And fo theApoftie cals to the Corinthians, and the Gala- thians who were far gone from God, yea fain from Grace, not to put off their old baptifm and to put on a new^ but to put off the old man, and to put on the new, to Repent of fin and to re- turn to the Grace of the Covenant,& to perform the condition of their baptifm , and to grow up in the fruits of the Spirit, minding them of their firft baptifm, that as many of them as were baptised into Chrift have fut en. Chrift, Galat. 3.27. 1 Cor. 6. 1 1 . fuch iverefome of you, but ye are wafted, but ye arefanllified, &c. fee aifo Rem. 6. 3 , &c. The Husband who hath kept the marriage contract invi- loable and undefiled in his part , and is willing to receive into bed and board a fornicatng wife, requires, no new marriage or .. the folemniries thereof again, but her humiliation onely and «* fubmiflion. with promife of better carriage after. God, who keepeth Covenant for ever, fait and indifToluble on his part, is alfo ever ready to admit into his Grace and Favor. all who have gone a whoring from him, onely upon their repentance and for- row.with refolvesof reformation lor time to come, and experts nonewfolcmn Re-baptiz;ngs and Re-dippings into the Cove- nant ; butlhavefpokenfomewhat of lhis,iiuhe Scribe inftnict- ed. I Rebaf ligation not the good old way of the ancient Fathers, 1 5 I fhall add to this point, but, afew words of the good old Fa- thers of the Church •, and fhall fhew by them that this your fe- cond baptifm,or rebaptizing, was & is none of 'their good old way. Some of them built their judgements againft Rebaptization, upon thofe Texts, Row. 6. 9. Heb.9.28. wherein its faid, Chritt died once for all, but once offered for fin : Hence Baft I de Spirit u fkntlo, Cap. 15* ^ oi^ct^iv to . herefore the • (and very p o- bably) confirmed it from the Scripture Dictates , mentioned and produced above. The third Catechiftic.J Quaere , aktit the wtntr of this Dipping. Qujir: 3. What warrant or command, or example,have you from the facred Scriptures , or the fucceeding Primitive Anti- quity, Dipfivg bw not with the Clothes on, 1 7 quity , for your dipping of perfons in their cloches and veft- ments at your baptizing them j fo your two Sifters ftripping themfelves in a chamber , and putting on other, and other; clothes , that fo they might have their own dry againft they came to the Houfe again from the Pond •, went into the Pond in their clothes, and there were dipped in their body, and clothes, (as you relate to me, and as you, or others inftru&ed them) All thisfpeaketh novelty, and nothing elfe but a new bufinefs, un- heard m Scripture , unfecn in Antiquity , and the Ancient Churches. For do you think that the Eunuch, or Lydia, were thus, and in this maner baptized of Philip and Panlm the waters clothed, and with their garments upon them \ and that to this purpofe they went alide in private to fhift themfelves of the fuits they had on, and to put on others, that they might have dry clothes ready, againft they came out of the water with their wet ones : fay not fo, no, not in your thought, for the Scripture faith no fuch matter ^ no, nor fuggefteth any fuch thing to thought. This being then Itlent here, fucceeding Antiquity muft br heard what they fay, and you cannot refu'c to do fo , feeing in your dipping you plead it for the g ood eld way , and reject my ap- peachmg 't for a new bufinels. Now :here, and then, when Baptifm was performed by im- merfion or d pping, (yec I make fome difference 'twist the words as I fhall fhew)'they ftript their bodies of all their clothes, and went into the water ftark naked, and were baptized naked , even as Adam and Eve created naked were in Paradife ^ as naked as ever they themfelv s were born into the world ■ as Chrift was crucified on the crofs , and as the boiies fhall go to heaven or hell : (for by thefe patterns, the Anc ents exprefTeJ the maner of it, and if you fee any vail, or fuch like, about, or over the bodies of any of thefe at the time of baptizing , it is the Painters fancy, it was not theirs,the Ancients fafhion.) I know you look for a proof of this old way , this naked truth, which I (hall give you to the proof and reproof of your new bufinefs, of clothed or cloaked novelty. Cyril of Bier. Cctecb. My flag. 1 1 . faith, 'cv^Cs *,v thi^oy if «* TTi^i t~i TtV yiwvtL, v.eu yvj.vJ n ■'• (2rc yvuv.i « j hi i'Vn wcIvtwv *\ tr-c ntyyv'Sri) &c. When ye went into the water, yon Cccc put — ' ■■' ■ ■ l» ■ ,' 1 8 Ptfprg wot not with the Cktbes on. put off your garments , as a token of the old man put off, &c. and (o being naked , you were like Chrift ^ who being naked, Spoiled the powers and principalities: and it was a wonderful thing ye were naked, and were not afhamed as Adam. And fo other Ancients of the Greek Church do teftifie the fame, whont 1 forbear to cite -y onely I adde Chryfoftom Bomil. 6. upon Col.z* becaufe he addeth the myfticail of this putting off the garment at baptifm, to be the putting offthe old man : 'A**' %*& wdwf- t>:onf,iyjpi'vZm ivrMtfii n'fMif'nv '■ WTXiftcdHi wo. tf.'XiX.fott.yn yj[y>*TtU, -e velit in caelum, &c And becaufe I may have occation anon, and again, to make ufeof itr I willalfo fet down Anfel- rr.ui his witnefs and words upon the third Chapter of Matthew, where twice he (kith it ., amongft the reafons he giveth of Chrift being baptized'r this was one, and another this, That none fliould difdain to be baptized of his inferiour, (as he was of JJm) That none fhould be afhamed to be naked or denudated in the fight of men, (as he was before fohn, and the reft of the company there baptized) P litres caufaquare Chrifliu ad ba- ptifmum acceffit, prime ut exemple tips invitaret ,. nequis forte i» :i-:>}c[!tih((minu.w dtugtkni crufafcent, &c* It feems by this teftimony Of Mtn^ w*meny or Infants, i £ teftimony of //«/?/*», that Chrift himfelf, as all thofe baptized of John, were baptizechiaked. — —— ->. If you think-all this to make nothing againft your new bufi- nefs, becaufe they fpeak of mens dipping , and yours was of womens dipping, 1 (hall therefore (becaufe I fee you minde not that of St. Pafrf, that in Chrift fefm rieyp there i* neither mah nor fetnale t no difcrmination of fixes, as to the Gofpel ordinan- ces) (hew you the fame old "way , in ufe for women alfo-, fo Chryfofiom in his Epiftle to Pope Innocent relateth , that women alfo were baptized and immerged naked : for there he relateth unto that Pope, how, when Thecphilits a Bifhopof Alexandria had raifed a tumult for the eje&ing of himfelf out of the Chuich, this, amongft other things, fell out , That the women who were there in the Church, and had ftript themfelves naked, as prepared for Baptifm , upon the noife , and for fear of this fudden and cruel commotion,ran away naked out of the Church; and through fear , had no time and leifure to provide for the fhamefaftnefs and modefty of that fex , by putting on their clothes again; I adde fomewhat to the words, but nothing to the fenfe of Chryfofiom. And he alfo relateth, that there were women appointed of purpofeby the Church (not tofliift off the better clothes in a chamber , and put on worfer to be dipt in, as your courle is) to accompany them to the water, and there to take offthcir clo: hes^ and fo alfo for the more decency, and that nothing of immodefty might appear or be occalioned, the women were baptized naked by themfelves aparc from men, (as the men apart by themfelves naked.) To which alfo Epi~ phanim atteiteth, Hares. 79. and Aftgufiine 22. Book of the city of God, 8. Chap, for Attgvfiine there fpeaks de parte fcemina- rum ad Bapufierinrn, a certain part and place about the Fonts, or where the women Pood apart from the men ready to be ba- ptized : like as Epiphanies doth of rayi**. Ataiaviyjav, i-it*. ri oiuyonrfy rii-)V9 txna y\vx^ &c. an order of DeaconefTes ap- pointed for the fafeguarding of the womens modefly and fhamefaftnefs, toundrefs them at Baptifm. And Cyril alfo in the place aforefaid. The which Cuftom held on until Bernards time, who was made a Monk in the year 1 1 1 o. in whofe dayes that old way was put by, becaufeof fome fcandall and offences were given or taken, through haughtinefs and wickednefs on Cccc 2 the 20 ofMett, fvomen, or Infants. the one or other fide , which the innocency and honefty of the former Ages kept oflfand prevented. By this time, Sir, I hope you fee, that your dipping of women in their clothes, is anew bufinefs in the Church, and hath no print or footiteps to be feen in the old way , or amongft the ancient Writers and Fathers of the former Churches. Tea, this your clothes-dipping alfo, is fo new a thing, that not much above fourteen or fifteen years ago , your predeceflburs , and primer Anabiptiits, the Virgins of Sion, and the precious Sons of the fame, theProfelytesof tbofe dayes, did in the Evening refort and run together, and went naked into the Rivers, their Jordan , and were there dipped and plunged in their naked bodies (without clothes on them) by their fo^-Dippers, or Dipper- fchns. v-- I cannot deny , but that Infants alfo , as well as grown perfons, were, according to the old way, undre/Ted, or taken out of their clothes, and were baptized and dipt naked, and pre- fently clothed again, and fo carried to theBifhop to be con- firmed, as Gregory the Great acknowledgeth in his Sacramt n- tary, in which is kt down the order of baptizing Infants : To which I fhall adde the Teftimony of' another . one Alexins or Albine, by name, who lived in the Year 780. and fo 220. years after the aforefaid Gregory • and the rather I do, becaufe he was anEnglifhman, born in Torkfhire, (and, it may be, thereupon called the other name Albine, of Albion) he was the fcholar of our venerable Bede, and the fchool-mafteralfo (as friend and familiar) to Charles the Great-, by whofe advice , Charles the Great founded the Univerfity oiParia^ and appointed four prin<- cipall Heads and Prefidents thereof , Rabanus, Alcuinus^ Clau- dius, fohames Seems, z\\ the Scholars of our Beda : (fo much is France beholding to England for their Learning and learned men) bnt to the purpofe, the words of Alcuine are , Vojlquam vefiiti ftterim Infantes (he is fpeaking of Infants after they had been baptized naked) depcrtantvr ante Pontificem adconfrman- di m ; who fate in a feat fixed fomewherc in the Church, or in Sacrario, the Chancel or Vtftry, for the fame purpofe ■ where- fey I conceive, it was at the fol?mn times of Baptifin , twice in the \ ear, Eafter and Whitfontide, an evideut Teftimony, both for Infant-baptifhi, and alfo for Infants baptized naked. And. "it Of Men^ mmtn^ or Ipfants* 2 i it is true alfo that the oJd and late Liturgy of our Church of England mcntioneth thcMinifters taking thechild to be ba- ptized,into his arms,& naming it, {halloas the Rubrick hath it) dip it in the water, fo it be difcreetly and warily done, but whe- ther in the cloaths , orontofthecloaths , it is not exprefTed. In prefent I think,and fo (hall, until I be better informed , that our Church meant a dipping of the Infant out of the cloaths , and therein owned the Antiquity of the pradife^ but yet (hewed her authority in things of fuch nature, for that (he addeth.if the child be weak, it (hall fuffice to pour water upon it, fo indulg- ing the health and welfare thereof:(and what child is not weak, m thefeour Northern cold Clymates ? ) though not contradi- cting Antiquity which did fo dip children naked in thole Eaftern warmer Countreys, where they might more fafelydo it- I am fure (lie meant not your new way of dipping in the cloaths over head and ears , and the whole body. What if (he meant the dipping of the naked face onely , or the naked fore- head , and head aifo in the water, by fuch as hold (till- to the dipping there mentioned ? fo doing , as it croffech not the Anti- quity for the reafon I gave but now , fo it favoureth not your novelty for the reafons 1 have given againfl: thefame all this while. By this time you may fee and hear how your dipping and ba- ptizing bodies in their cloaths, ia a new bufines, and none of the old way. I remember Jvftin Martyr in dial', ad Tryph. gives the Pharilees, that peculiar term and epithite, of /3*^W;., becaufe of their wafhing fo many things,as cup<5,pots,veflels and tables, as are mentioned Markj-^. But thefe are civil orfuperlH- cious wa(hings, or ceremonial. Your Scribes furpade thefe Pharifees, indipping of cloaths and all , in their baptizing and wafliings, which are Ecle(iaftical,religious. and even moral with them,and therefore may more juftly be called Ga.*T-:r */, dippers or wa(hers,and in this ienfe, Johns the Baptifts. I do look when you (hall fall from this novelty in this Sacrament of Baptifm^to fuch another novelty in the other Sacrament , and when you break bread, give it into your profelytes hands.with their gloves on. I omit to open unto the Reader, the packet of thefe otheu frivolous if not fcurrilous Rites and Ceremonies which were ufeij at this your dipping, fome whereof you relate, and others, Yibc 2 2 X>tyfwg andpronQuncingjb&fti'fy^&c.mHfl be in the fame hfittnt. modeftylfuppofe)you fiience,but are talked of by else fpe&ators as rtdicufous arret tniamous. I queftkm them not at all, for thoy were ?1I fuch,{|ue$ionlefs,onely this I queftion,Hdw men of fuch fincerity onely, fhould be thus full of ceremony alfo, and won- der alio how you, who hate in others, innocent and ftgnificant ceremonies in minifterial celebrations, and abominate them, as the abomination of defolation,throwing them away as the rags, and patches of Popery, and rending them off, as the fringes and laces of the whore , fhould now be (6 far in love of them as to clothe and adorn your Dippal adminiftrations in fuch orfenfive and fenflefs Kites, and Ritual drefles , fo that your brother may be better called a mafter of Ceremonies then a Miniiier of Or- dinances. This-one thing I (hall queftion here,, why your brother wa*fo quick of his words,and fo flow at his work? for fo it feems by the narration (which is your relation)that he jpake the tvords aecorA- tag to the -irji fatten; 1 baptise thee in the Name of the Father , the S\/-, .indthe htly. Gheft, before he dipped them in the Heater , though but tmmediatlj before, The which I take to be another novelty,if not more/orr.e vanity be not in it. For our Englilh Liturpv . confenant to the- ancient Litur- gies of he Churches, doth otherwhe and better practife & di- rect : where (as the Rut nek hath it) the Minifter naming the child, fl.all dip it in the water, faying,, I baptize thee, e^f. And I conceive there is good reafon for it , that the dip- ping into, or fprinkling with water, and the pronouncing the words of adminiftration I baptize ,erc.{hou\d be done in one and thefame inllant of time, as two conjunct Ads, (and not one be- fore the other) becaufe the (ign and the t hing fignified are two correlate parts, and go together, not one before the other. If either may go immediately & inttantly before the other.lt is the dipping, before the words, as our Liturgy hath it, (Dip it in the water, faying) and not the words before the dipping as your T) mpany doth it, (he fpake the words^ before he dipped) nay, there is not verity or truth in it to fay the words, I. ba- ptize, &c. before the party be in the water , or the water upon the party. Lit your Dippers tongue,dipt and tipt (it may be)aforehand for the better keeping out of the cold of v\ ater, d d run fo faft, in of wtter in Baptifmy Commw water. 2 $ in the pronouncing the words ofinftitutution ( too fa ft indeed, as which did run before it was fent^and Jpake before the Lord opened the mouth of 'the man , Numb.22.2S.) that his hands , having taken fuch faft hold of the fifters hy their clothes about the flioulders and loath to let it go, or put them out of his fight, till needs muft,he forgat the work fraction of dipping them,& pur- ting them under the water at the fame tirne,or before the fpeak- ing of the words of Institution : And fo I may fay, as the Comar- dian doth „ in a like dipping and tripping , Neque lingua *ecjue WAnm fuumfaciehant ojficium , I may put in necjue pedes (as the Comedian doth)for his feet ran too faft to the Pond,afwel as his tongue ran too faft in the Pond. The Fourth Catcchifiical Quaere t is about the place where the pipping was done. Q. 4. What warrant have you of precept , or example of fecred Scripture, or fucceeding primitive Antiquity, for your dipping of yourS Hers & other your Pro'elytes,in Ponds at your Baptizing. This to be don:, I underRand from all prefent there. It was your modefty and humility not to make any Re- lation or mention of it, for that it was your own Pond of your yard, and fo not to glory of it, that theDipper fhould make choice of yourPond7your common & ordinary pond,where your Ducks and Geefe do wafh themfelves dayly, to honour.it with: a folemn dipping of two fpecial Sifters therein at their Bap- tifm. I fpeak not this, aj if I took exception to common and ordi- nary water, ufed in Baptifm ; yea, I acknowledge that Goc£ thereforeelfo made choice of the vulgar and common Ele- mentary water to fe.tforthr as the purifying and cleaning of fouls from fin, by the b'ood of Chrift (which water that wafh- eth doth well reprefent) fo the general offer and benefit of the grace of Chrift thereby to all, rich and poor , even the meaneft and vulgars (whi«h the commonnefs and copioufnefs of water, every where to be had, doth alfo intimate.) And therefore that queftion about the necefiity of water unto bap- tifm, fo that in decay and defect, thereof, there can be no Bap- tifm in wine, or milk, or other liquor,needed not either to ha ve- beenfirft raifed, or after fo hotly purfked by Hunnius and his party „ for that water is fo common, a. liquor as every wher> 2 4 Whet her wine in defect of Wtter may be ufned. where to be had, and at all times, as there will be no need (nor hath been that ever I read) of running out for wine, ox other liquor to minifter the fame in Baptifm. yea, and fo long as water may be had, wine or other liquor is not to be ufed out of a luxury of pride, or pride of luxury, left they be called yi/jariiiorotv6ra.<>::rxhtot'usy winy and windy men too, like as fome, who ufed water inftead of wine in the Lords Supper, when this might alfo be had under a pretence of abilinence,but not abitinence of pretence, were called by the Church >f0^-a- p;i?v.T*/,or Aqmr'ri^ watry and wafhy Hercticks, as Avgufiir.e witnelTeth , Harrf. 64. But yet this I add, that if there be fuch an invincible want and unavoidable fcarcity and privation of water for Baptifm, and wine for the Lords Supper, fo as no watc. can be procured, 1>ut < nely wine may be had , where baptifm cannot with edifi- cation, and ought no: in duty, to be delayed ; fo alfo no wine 1 an be gotten, hue onely water, where the Lords Supper can- KOt with edification, and ought not in duty'to be delayed, there the one may befupplk-ci by the other in each Sacrament ^ the water by wine in baptifm , and the wine by water in the Lords Supper. And if there be no affectation of novelty in ei- ther, no contempt of either of theelements,no neglect or inqui- sition or acquisition of the proper element to either, I fuppole. there can be no charge of Hercfie , or breach of inftitution , in iuch administrations , where the peculiar and proper common e!err.ents(as I may fo call them)of wine and water, proper to the LordsSupper, andcommonly in ufe, proper to Baptifm, and commonly in ufe, cannot be had and procured, where fuch admi- niftra ions ought to be done and performed. If any fhall here ask what need all this, feeing water is every where to be had for baptifm , and alfo wine for the Lords Sup- per, I a'-if.vei\either,is not fo every where to be had , and there- fore it is not a needlefs difcoarfe- for there is no ufe of wine in y/wtr/Vtf, where there where brethren that wrote loCr.lt'tn here- abouts,as Btna in his 25 epiltle relatcth ; and there are beHdes a font who werey&are & fo called, Abstcmkwjxho cannot endure tiie very fmell or.-leaft talt of wine,but they will Iwoon away, as we fpeak; and h\\ down for dead, what fhalfrhefe be done to ? i hc\ mufruiiher not receive the Lords Supper at all , which they whet her wine^ in deft ft rfwdter, may be ufed> 2 5 .they cannot well anfwer , if they ask not for it , nor we, if we deny it them •, or elfe we muft give it, and they receive it but in one- kinde, (for neither can they away with it, if diluted and mixed with water) and then we fhall doasthePapiftswould have us, and Bcllarvtine propoundeth , as the wife way of the Roman Church , to heal up this inconvenience, namely, the withholding of the Cup from fuch .people, (lib.^.deSacr. cap. 24.) And how and if the Prieft alfo fhould be fo Abftemi- ous ? its readily replied, none of thefe are ever taken with fuch a dii'eafe. What remains then , but that they muft and may take this Sacrament in water, or other drink , ufuall and familiar unto them j like as Philip Malanllhon tells the Ruthins , that they may do well to take the fame in their u^s^a/, or ordinary Mede, for the fcarc.ty of wine amongft them, lib. de nfu integri facramenti. And if there had been no water in that Defart where the Eu- nuch was converted, and earneftly defired Baptifm, (as in many defarts there is none) and he had faid, See here is wine in my cha- riot (in ftead of) See here is water , what doth hinder me to be baptized, I doubt not but Philip would have baptized him therein, and the abfence of water would not have hindered it, but the providence of God difpofed it otherwife, and better too, there. Laftly, I fhould not have touched upon this difcourfe, but that I finde Runnins, and Be 'liar mine, and another J emit, faco- btu ^Gualteritu , courfly handling Calvin, Bez,a, Melantlhon hereabouts, whom I ought to defend in the way of truth, as be- ing three great Lights of the Proteftant Religion. To let the firft of thefe alone, Hunnius •, the third I named Gttalterins, cal- leth this a Diabolicall mutation of the Eucharifttcall matter, lib. 1. Tabula Chnnol. The kcond^Bellarmine, roundly asketh, Qtiis dedit Philippo authoritatem matandi (acramentorum mate- rum ? fomewhat like my Scribe and Pharifee • By what autho- rity doeft thou thefe things, and who gave thee this authority ? (he fpeaksth of Philip Melantlhon) I anfwer,Ch rift gave it un- to him, and the other two , (in the cafes mentioned) and that upon good reafon. For a good reafon hereof may be given, that this being the mind and meaning of our Saviour Chrift, D d d d by 2 6 Whether wine in defaft ef water may be ufed. by fetting forth the fignes of thofc things by which our bodies are waftied and cheri(hed(as the water and wine) thereby to prefcnt our spiritual ablution and augmentation by his blood , we do no way fwerve or go from that his mind *nd meaning, if without any wantonnefs of innovating in the want of the one , we fubftitute another, as wine for water in baptifm, or water for wine in the Lords Supper , or any other com- mon and ordinary liquor that may have , though not an equal, yet alike analogy , of walhing and nourifhing fpiritu- ally. By which may be put back what the aforefaid Hmnim ob- jedeth, (as that wc have no word of inftitution,none for fubfti- tution,and whatfoever is not of faith is fin) all which are blunt- ed, by our keeping ftill to the minde and meaning , purpofeand intention of Chrift, as to the end and ufe of the elements in ge- neral , though the particular elements themfelves cannot be procured. And whereas he puts a man fo baptized under fome perplexity of confeience and under the temptation of Satan (for 1 will inftance but in that) (fee you are not baptized with water, but with fome other liquor which was neither fanctified by any Word of God, to this ufe of waftiing away fin , neither hath it any fuch promife inScripture adjoined therto)he may be taken out of the fame tentation, by this anfwer of a good con- feience- That water was fought out for, and none could be got- ten, and he was in danger and extremity of life , and in diftreflc and want of Chrift, and his blood to wa(h his fins away. There being fome wine in a veffel in the houfe, a Minifter affecting no innovation, but his good and falvation, and the facramental ap- plication of Chrifts wafhing blood for his farther confirmation and confignation which hefo earneftly dcfired,took wine (when lie could have no water) and poured of it upon him , ufing the words / btpn'zr thee in the Name of the Father, the Sen, and the Lnfy drifts and fo he may hope, ye doubt not- but God hath ac- cepted of him as rightly baptized and interreflfed in Chrift. If it befaid, what analogy in the Lords Supper is thereof water to wine, feeing this is made up of many bunches of grapes-, or in kaptifrn,of wine to water, feeing this hath a vertue to wafh and cleanferl reply, fuch particular analogies ( though they may be profitably thought of where the proper Elements to each Sr.cra- mcr.t Baftifyg ofold^n River s, Fount Aim pot Ponds t 27 mene may be pofllbly gotten , which are not negligently to be emitted, yet are they not fo precifely to be urged, and ftridly prefled the one againft the other, in the times of the fcarcity of each (Though if fo, I can fay , That the water alfo is made up of many drops of Rain , and the wine hath alfo a wafhing and cleanling vertue) It is fufficient that there is here a general ana- logy for the teftifying of our mutual Communion and fpiritual ablution , as here is, in that we ufc the fame kind of fymbols, as drink (and meat alfo)and wafhing,which are common and ufual amongft us, in defect, of the proper and fpecial, and fpecially in that we holdone and the fame faith in, conjunction with, and fan&ification by one C hrift and Saviour. If indeed, though in a cafe of exigency and fcarcity of water,any fhould fubftitutcor ufefuch a matter as hath no power at all in it felf to wafti or cleanfe ofFthe filth of the body,& fo not to fignifie the blood of Chrift which cleanfeth from the guilt of fin , it were to bedifal- lowed , as that Eaptifmus Arenari m fpoken of by Nicep her tts, lib. 3. caf, uh. how that a young man of the Hebrews being defperately fick and calling for baptifm , in want of water was fuperfufed with fand,and miraculoufly recovered immediately ^ whom notwithstanding the Bifhop of jifialonia being confulted with thereabouts , fent away unto Jordan to be truly baptized ^ the former baptifm, being indeed asthehoufe intheGofpel, built upon the land and could not ftand. I know noHiftory of a fandy Supper of the Lord , as I may fo fpeak , to parallel with that fandy baptifm, as twa> called,unlefsitbethat/5«v?rrtr- ».r,that dry Communion and Supper the Popifh Priefts do give to their people • for they alfo as to the one material part of this facrament, give them not that which doth and fhould reprefenc the blood of Chrift, and fatisfte their thirlt , as who give them no wine, nothing at all inftead of it-, and is it not all one, to give them n thing, and to give them that which doth not, nor can fignifie the blocd, and fatisHe the thirft & I am fure nothing doth neither But why do I thus enlarge I return to you and your Pond water. And here again I mult tell you , it was a new bufinefs, for the ancient manner of the Church in the pureft times was to baptize,as out of the Church, fo in VVels and Rivers,Floods and Fountains,fo WaUfridns Strtho faith in the it Chapter of Ec- Dddd 2. clehaftical 28 Baptising cfeldy in River s^ Fountains, net Fends. clefiaftical things ? For thus Chrift and all the other multitudes of people were baptized of John in the river for dan, as is cxpref- ly faid by the Evangelifts , two of them, Matth. 3.13. and. 6. Mark^ t .5 ,Q.and where it is faid,fohn baptized in water, lv J &5* Beza noteth that fordan is meant in th«t Story, wherefoever its mentioned in the lingular number , as there ^4^.3. 11. And whereas felon 3.32. fvhn was alfo baptizing in i^£non , neer to Salim , becaafe there was much water there, either fordan over- flowed hither alfo,and thefe wereother rivers about Aroer, and and by the river Armn mentioned in the Books of Afofes oft, and meant here by the many waters,like as Alls %. id. they came to a certain water }and the 'Eunuch faid, See here is water , thereby is meant the river Bleuther as , lying without the borders of tAEgypt, where Phi/ip overtook or found the Er.nuch, and ba- ptized him,faith our learned ifr-^Yea.and that Text,^f/j 16. 13, and 15. that Lydia and her hctijbcld were baptized by a Rivers ftderof the Apojile St. Paul. Now tell me who of old,asoldthe Gofpel & as the A&sof the Apoftles was ever baptized,or (as you fpeak) dipped in a Pond? True in the 5 o£J«hn there is mention made of a Pond or Pool (Stagnant, aftandingor pent up water) whereinto whofoever, after the moving or troubling the water by an Angel defcend- 4ng , ftepped infirft.wasmade whole of whatsoever difeafe he had j but this being a fpecial Pond of water, extraordinarily af- lifted of God,and wiracuLujly, for medicinal cures of bodily di- feafes , maketh nothing for Ponds generally and ordinarily ap- pointed, and myftericpijly ufedfor baptifmal wafhing offpintutl tins of the foul: Where is now your zeal for Scripture examples, and patterns, that you fc> much pretend to make fhew of? How are you ftill taken tardy inthofe «kfaults (as you make them in us) of humane inventions ? is this your conf rmity to the Word,is it not rather your difformity from it,and its prefidents? and fo indeed this people have committed two evils, you have lbrfaken the elear Fcntains and Rivers , and Well-fprings and have fought out muddy Ponds, Pooh, and (landing waters to dip your profelyte? in, and fo leaving t be Scripture examples , em- brace your own inventions : we- our felves do not therefore ba- pti'ze,no not in Rivers or Fountains-, riordo weprefsthe fame '■upon you. ?or Babtizing of old, in Rivers, Fountains, not Ponds. j p For fuch examples are not (we know) left upon the record of Scriptures fof our imitation ^ but for oar learning , Rom. I 5 . 1 4. Yea,we finde the euftom of baptizing inRivers and Springs, ufed by John the Baptift, and pra&ifed alfo by Philip,to have bin al- tred&nd left by oiher the Difciples and Apoftles. Peter there- fore baptized, or if not Peter himfelf, thoie that accompanied Peter thither , or fome Difciples he met there, (becaufe its (aid , Peter commanded them of Cornelius houfe to he baptized , and no man is faid properly to command himfelf) Baptized them with* in the doors ,and did not remove thence,tbey and all the company to the next Rivers or Fountains. Yea^ and Paul (though he had but lately, Alls 16.13, an(i *% baptized Lydia and her house- hold at a Rivers fide , a place where prayer was went to be made, as alfo preaching . and whither women reforted , and whither cams Lydia with her houfhold, who, the Lord opening her heart, attending to what Paul faid, was converted , andfo, being at this- time by the Rivers fide , was baptized there occa- honally)in the fame C ha peer 33,34. Verfes bap ized the fjtjlur and all his , in the prifon-houfe,. occafionally alfo, becaufe he was there,and in that place converted to the faith: the words them- felves do evince the fame. The fay lor tovkJPaul and Silas , the fame hour (it was midaightj and wa/hed their firipes and was ba- ftizedyhe,and all hu flraightway, and therefore the Difciplse lead them not out to the nexc Rivers & Fountains ,lt was no time & , feafon to do it at midnight,and his being baptized ftraightway, the fame hour, fheweth that there was no Hay made until next morning, to have it done in any fiich place:, and the like is to be thought of all thofe other perfons and ttieir houjholds whom St. Paul is faid to havebaptized,namely,in their houfes, and not in Rivers and Fonntains Likewife ( which I fhould have men- tioned firft) Ananias baptized Saul in the kufe wheie he found him , fitting in lorrow for his perfecution , and in amazement about his vilion in the way, though now blmde.: fo the feries of the Text fheweth it ,.. AnaniM went his way , entred into the • houfe where Saul was, put his hands upon him , and. immediate- ly the fc ales fell from his eyes, and he received his fight forth- with , aofe and was baptized , namely ^ in the place and houfe where hewas, Alls 9, 19. Afterwards in procefs of time,, the Church of God, left off going to Rivers r.sfor baptifm,. jo Of Fonts And Baptifteries* baptifm , and ordained large vefels for the fame purpofe, cal- led B 'apt ifieria with theLatines, and zwptMpt with the Greeks; and wi th us, as with them alfo , Ambrcfe and others , Fonts, or Founts •, though at ririt thefe were placed without the Chufch or Temple,but with a houfe alfo over the fame,and that for the honotr of the Chriftian Religion, and the more decent celebra- tion of that myftery thereof, foCjril in his firft Catech.and Pah- linns in his 12 Epiftle to Si vtras , and N^zsan^en in his 40. Oration. And there wa< at firft but one of thefe in a City placed nigh unto the Baflica or greateft Church , wherein all,rich and poor were baptized ; like as it is ftill obferved and to be feen in Florence, Parma, Benonia, tnd other Cities of Italy. And one thing more of Antiquity I wil! acquaint you , and fome others with, that both Ccrtftantine the Great, Ernperour,and Profeflbr too, in theyear 3x10 after Chnft,or thereabcu synade ©n«>him- ff ! f, a cftftfy Font for baptizing, and willed others to do the like, whofe ©utGde was of Marble , or Porphyry, and the inside of _|)ure ySZ-z/ir, which I repeat to tax the niggardtfe or prcphanenefies of thefe latter ages , wherein men who yet are great profefIors5 put off the fame Sicrament of baptifm , with an earthen Bafon, or a pewrer one atthe beft, in moft places. And fo a little after for good caufes , they >cmmoved their Fonts or B ptifteries , into the very Churches , and placed them ( as they were with us ) next the porch or entrance of the fame as* Gregor. Turcnenfis witnefleth , lib .2. hi]}, cap. 2 1 . fo called , becaufe he was Bifhop oiTurw in » France in theyear 5 7 3. who teftifieth this amongft theHiftories- of Fr axe e, which he wrote.and fo alfo doth the Decretal diftinll. 4. cap. 106. I or good caufes faith Turonenfis , beft known to themfelves , which becaufe he could not , or would not relate, beinginahiilory (and that removal of the Fonts was of my- itery) this may be one , that the word , and the firft feal of en- trance, whii I) is baptifm, as well as the fccond feal, .of ccntinu- ance,and perfeverance, which is the Euchar ft , might bc.both admimrtred within the Chuich, for more order, decency, and convenience fake. No wall this 1 have added to (hew how your ?cnd-bapufn?y , is a netter a pond of water to be dipped in- wherein you were like to thofe in James , who had their fair h in refped of perfons.who fa d but to Kfc poor in vile rayment fiand thou there , 'or fit here under my foct-ftocl , dip thou here in my horfe-pond : yet you being abour a work of the Lords appointing , as you pretended, namely,a dipping,& naming it baptifm (thisindeedis the work of the Lord) it merited one of your belt , deer eft yand pureft water-ponds > to do the Lords work in, otherwise yoa make the baptifm of the Lord defpieable, by your chu'ng a 3 1 D f pi fig and Immtrging differ. foul, muddy, horfe-cow-hog- pond for dipping, as they in Malachy, who made the Table of the Lord contemptible, by their cjfering to him the blinde , and the lame, and the frck^fcrfacrifce^ Mai. r . 7, 8. If you think of no better then fond-water, and futh water- ponds , inftead of River-water or Fountain, for their dipping in at the firft Sacrament, ) our poor profelytes may be afraid, that you will kt forth the brown-baf to them initead of white -bread for their feeding , at the next Sacrament : for this people vrho knoweth not the Lave, are curfed, in comparifon of themfelves ('fay the bleffed Scribes and Pharifees. Thefift Chatechifiical Qu,if not alfo £«wt<> ?for which (letting Lexicons and Grammarians reft) I will produce Nicephms, Narrat. Lib. Cap. 3. where fpeaking of Novatus, how that after, or upon great ficknefs, converted, hedefired to be bapt zed -t Aquam fetiit,quh in lefloipfo,ita ttti decumbebat ', perfufw, baptizatix fcilicetefi ; Jiquidem Tin&ionem hk\ufmodi E«ptiJrKum vocari licet-, where you fee that the three words, Tindion, Perfufi- on and Baptifm are all one, and both perfufion and tin&ion are called Baptifm. This Nkepborut lived in the year 1330. above 300. years fithence, But I have undertaken to be rather a cenfurer of your work, then a Critick of words. And yet before I pafs from this, I muft not fo much Criticife as Catechize you about the word of baptizing, which fomeof yourLearmd irt the Greek tongue (though moft of you are profefling and profefled againft both learning and languages) do urge for your dipping and immer- ging Baptifm, for fo they derive $at.?r!j£m from :;' tt •, which lig .itieth to dip and immerge, and hence conclude, that the dipping and immerging Baptifm is the true and oncly Baptifm, as derived from di.-ping. 1 . But firft, How if.lf-TT* doth alfo (as it doth alfo) (T gni- B e e e He 34 A white garment put en in Baptifm. fie to Wafh, then doth it not fetch in with it,our fprinkling and afperfing Baptifm, or rather the pouring on, or laying on of water with the hand, and gently rubbing the face or forehead therewith ? Yea, and the word fignifieth alfo to Dye, (as well as to dip ©u wafh ) and intimateth that changing of the Blew or Colour (as I may fo call it) which is in Baptifm^ and which is alluded to, in Ifayi. 1 6. Wafh ye, make ye clean , put away the evil of your do- ing ■, and then at the 1 8. v. Though your fins be asjcarlet, and red as Crimfon , they Jhall be as woe I, and white as [now : For whereas in our natural eftate, we are deep Dyed, in fins and tranfgreffions, as fcarlet and crimfon, and as the ^Althiopian% have contracted a black skin upon our fouls, which we cannot change , and are as full of black [pots as the Leopard, which we cannot put off by any of the powers of nature, fer. 1 3 . 23 . when we are baptised into Chrift, we do put on Chrift, that pure and immaculate Lamb,who fpreadeth over us the white Fleece of h s innocency and righteoufnefs ; and therewith, as with a white garment,covereth all our black deformi;ics,and fo(which is ftrange)being dipt in his blood, we are dyed white t.f.innocent as in the (ight and acceptation of God ■, which was fignified of old , by putting prefently a white garment upon the party baptized, or which Ambrcfetpezkeih, Lib.de its qui initiantur my ft. Cap, 7. Accepifti peft btc Vtftimenta Candida, ut ejfet indi- cium, qucd extteru involucrum peccatorum, Or indueris innocen- ti.t c. fta velamina, de qmbus dixit propheta, Afperges me, Do- - mine, Hyfopc, dr mundabor, lavabis me, & fuper nivem detlba- /■/r.And fo the fame Gregory Turoxenfis (whom I cited before) Lib.*). Hift.Cap.\l.Ren;:tufcj; Deo per Baptifmi Sacrament um cum Albatureliquis & ipfeprocedit -, and a little after, Albi- c/.bat tota chit as de Crege candido. I add alfo the teftimony of our Countryman Rabanut Manrus, one of Beda, his Scho- lars, who, Lib. I. de Jr.ftit. cler. Cap. 2Q. Pi ft Baptifmum tra- ditur (hrifiicno velKs Candida , deftgntns inncccnt'n:m & puri- tttem Ckrift'u.nam, qvam p fiech properly and radically, -but to •/er it cannot have dominion, or bring damnation. 2. Our Saviour asketh the two ambitious Suitors, CAnjehe bapti^ediviththe baptifm that 1 am baptized nith i and foretel* leth them, With the Baptifm that Jam hpti^ed Kith , fhiill Jt bebaptUtd, Mark 10.38,39. What did he mean, that either himfelf or thofe two Apoftles fhould be dipped all over in blood and immerged therein ? no, rather, but that they fhouldbe fprinkled with the -afapj.thereof, and beimeared with. the fame* fo himfelf, Though blood trickled down his bead,by the prick- ing of the Tf horns, and blood ran down his back, byithe cut- tings of theicourge, and blood ifTuedout with water out of hislide, by the piercings of thefpear, and blood fell out of his hands and f eet,by the wounding of the fpikes and naiies^ fprink- hd he might be, and afperfed in body, and fo was with bloody but dipt and immerged he was not, and yet bapti^d with the baptifm thereof : and as for the two Brothers, James, was kil- led of Herod with thefword , Act. 12.2. arid fo he was bapti- zed in blood, but not dipt in it ; and John was banifhed by 'Don itian into the Ifle of Patmos, in the 90 year of the Nati- vity of Chrift ( which was , as every perfecutton is, a kind of Jfach baptifm as is here meant by our Saviour) where? he endu- red Exile nine or ten years, and there wrote the Revelation to the Churches • but being after reJeafed by T>A)antu, he retur- ned to Bphefm; ao& there wrote his 'Gofpel , and there dyed Zaptityp wit bent tiffing and imnterging^y f prink ling . 3 7 in thejoo. year after the Nativity, he onely amongfr all the A- " poftles (being the Survivor of them all) ficca mcrte & finefaq- guine zsfome fay, though Augufline, Libro Sclil'jcj. Cap. 29. Tom, 9. hath thefe words, Vencni poculum Johannes intrepid w fotavit. He was forced to drink a cup of poyfon, but he faith not that he died thereof- fo if he were not baptized with the baptifm that Chrift was, he drank of the cup which Chrift did, and foretold he {hould die alfo, in the fame Text. 3 . John the Baptift told the people that He who came after him, meaning Chrift, Jhould baptize them with the Bolj Ghcfi and with fire^Wiat. 3. 11. and Chrift himfelf foretold theApoftles, they (houldbe baptized with the Holy Ghofl not many dayes hence , AcT:s i.<). and fo they were on the day of Pcntecoft following, when there appeared unto thevt cloven tongues like as of pre, and fat upon each of them , and they were all filled with the hdy Ghcfi, Ads 2. 3,4. thus were they baptized with fire and the holy Ghoft-, but not dipped or immerged'm that fire, but rather al- perfed or fuperfufed,according to the phrafe of Scripture, I will pur out myfpirity Joel 2.28. and the fpirtt was fhed abundantly, Titus 3.6. I could tell you of more baptizings (for fo the word is in th° original J of Cups, Tables, and Beds, as they are mentioned in theEvangelift, Mark^j.4. The which howfoever they may fit you well, as being Pharifaicai and Hypocritical •, and me al- fo, as wherein there was no dipping or immerging, but onely wafhing and rubbing, I paiTe by for brevity fake, as alfo that which the Fathers call n rav d.iSi9yui caMed fince the Baptifm of Repentance, in which they were not merged or drowned in tears -p that's but a metaphorical phrafe to fhewan abundance of their weeping, but onely fprinkled and perfufed with tears, by which they did feek and defire the remiflion of their fins, and alfo found and obtained the fame, 4. I will add but one more, 1 Cor. 15 29. Elfe what /hall they do which are baptized for the dead} v\ hether it be taken paf- _/JW/7,according to thetranflation , for thofe who were bap- tized with water, for dead^ i.e. given over for dead, or ready to die, or whether Actively and Pafiively, for thofe who aid bap- tize, and alfo were baptized .overt he. dead-, (i) upon th graves of ^he dead, a/n being oft, as here put for wS-nj as Learned BezA ^b which of the ttvo JVajes, the good old fvdj. £«^'obferveth upon Mat. 1 7. 27. and Mar^ 1 0.48 . or whe- -fheric be me-inr, who are wafheafor dead, their dead bodies are wafhed, according to the cuftom of the Patriarchs, asyetthen retained in the Church, and mentioned to be done unto Dorcas, ' 4fts 9.37. who being dead they vrajbed and /aid. in an upper rharhb?r^\-\\\\:\\ way foever that Baptising with water be meant, it cannot imply any dipping or immerging , as being unto dying perfons , or unto perfons baptized over graves , or unto dead bodies. And thus I have (hewed you , that there may be baptizing*, where there arc no dippings and immergings, and that this deri- vative SaVTiL/^isof a larger (igniheation then its original .Saw?.'.-, as to the general , and therefore that it can be no Argument to prove your dipping to be the baptizing, becaufe baptiim is a de- rivative word from the root jaiifiri -,{lgnifying to dip. And fo I come now to the very particular work in hand, and ffoall take it not onely in the Grammatical and Theological fenfe, but in the very Sacramental and Myftical meaning, the proper- ly baptizing with water Jn theNameoftheFather,and the Son, and th holy Ghoit,fo as John the Bapcift, Peur, and Paul, and Philip, and the Deacons.and the 72 Difciples gave and rainiftred it*-, fo as Jeruffilem and all Judea round about Jordan , Chrift and the Apoftles,the 3coo.the 5 ooo.the Eunuch, Ljdia% the Jay lor, and the feveral houlholds gave ir, and received , and parta- ked of it; It is confefTed on both fides,that the former baptized,and the later were baptized, both according to ihc gesd old way, and in the right and true manner. The which, whether it was by Dip- ping and Immersing the body into,and under the water,or onely jfrti. kjinqr and a,?perUng,or laying on.and pouring the water up- on feme part, that is the qutjtm -. for whereas the two mothers itrove about the living child, whofe of the two the child fhould be ^ here the two children, dipping And Jprinkjing , which I may call the twins of Rebecca , or the Churches two man- ners of baptizing firive whofe of the two the mother, Baptifm, fhali be. The Church ofEngUnd hath been now of a long time , time out of mind . mind of any man Jiving, in firm ftfl'tJFt* of ba- pilhi , ar.d practice of it, by fprinkling, or laying on ofwator upon — — — — .. . , — — fcll. . ,1 III I which of the two rvayesy the good old way. 4 1 upon the face and fore-bead , and gently wafhing and rubbing the fametherewith.and pronouncing the word of Inftitution,In the name, &c. it is your part to bring the Writ ofEjeclion, a. word, or the Examples of the word fumcient to difpoflefle and cjeft us out of our baptifm,and to inveft your felf into the fame, by fhewing your better title and plea of dipping andimmerging the whole body in or under the water. All that you can , and therefore do produce for your dipping and immerging, that ever I could read of,are (befides that deri- vation of the word, baptifm,from an original word, that fo fig- v nifieth) the three examples of John the Baptiit, Philip, and Paul baptising , our Saviour Chrift, ;the Ethiopian Eunuch, and Zj- dia. But for that argument,drawn from the derivation of the word Baptifm,you have heard enough already ,and I pray let me hear no more of it,as not being of force3or to the purpofe, unlefs you can fheWjthat fo it is always ufed in the Gofpel, and that where- foever baptifm was miniftred, there was dipping and immerging into, and under the water, otherwife, words are of valuers mo- ney is , according to the efieem of men, and the ufe of the time Hummus a vo^a and as the Poet hath it ■ Si volet ufut.. (i.e.) confuetudo hqnendi , Quern penes arbitrium eft & jus & norma Icqucndi, Both of wheh derivation ,and ufe or value of the word,are for the afperfion and perfufion of water upon a part , to be under- itood by baptifm, afvvel (if not better) in facred Writ, then for immmerfion or dipping of the whole body, yea, the word in its proper and genuine fignificaticn(as well as in its derivation, as I have (hewed) importeth but an ablution and wafliing with wa- ter, which is ordinarily practifed and performed in our good and old way of baptizing , and which doth not ueceflfarily infer or iriforce your new bufinefs of dipping and immerging in , and under the water, the whole body cloathes and all. But for your exam pies of Scripture, (for precept there is none in the Word, Co and Baptife, for the dipping. ) I will fet down v, hat the Texts have , and in o^er as the E- vang^lifts report of Johns baptizing Chrift, Matth. 3 . 1 6. and ftraighftvay coming up bvtof 'the "water , He(i.Q.)fchnJaw the Hea- vens opened , and the Spirit like a Dove dffcf tiding ufen him, Efff "Luk Ckrift by Johns ethers by tks Apoftles, Lake 3. 21, faith oncly, that ht being baptized and pray ingythe Heavens were opened; fo of Philips baptizing theEunuch^ftj fc. 3 8 . They went down both h,to the waterJbothPhilip and the Eunuch, a„d he baptized him. So of Pauls baptizing Lydia, Afts 1 6. 1 3 ,and 1 5 . On the Sab- bath he went out of the City , by a Rivers fide where prayer was •wont to be made, there Lydia hearing Paul preaching , and at- tending, was baptized. All this that I hear, is Text, but where is that that is for your Tenet of dipping and immerging > why do you not prefs it, and' argue from hence, any of, or all of the three Texts ? nay where is any intimation that axy of thefe per fans were dipped andim- merged in any of thefe Rivers ? If you fay , there, where it is faid> that Chrifi defcended inU the water , I muft tell you, that's no where exprefly fet down^ but onely by conference , becaufe it is faid, He went up firaigkt- roay out of the water (I pray hereafter, you and your brethren, love good confequences better, and ftand not alwayes upon verbal cxpreffions of the Scriptures for everything.) It is in- deed faid of the Eunuch exprefly ,, That he went down into the -water at his baptizing • but of Lydia neither of both is faid,, but onely that (be was amongft the reft, and that foe was bap- tized by the Rivers fide. But what of Chrifts defcending down into the waters ? If I fha 11 argue for you, and conclude hence it is onely this, that therefore it was not nowHarvefl: time, when John Baptized Chrift and others, for Jordan overfloweth all his banks in the time ofHarvefty Jof. 3.15. then they could not have either gone down into, or have come up out of Jordan : But you fhall ar- gue for your felf, and conclude hence, if you will or can (for I neither will nor c&n.yTherefore Chrijfs body was all over dipped and im merged in Jordan, underwater,, over head and ears as you fay, that followeth not thence j Therefore alfo in his tloaths tyed about him as you do, nor that. More probably, if he was fo dipt , it was in his naked body, and out of cloaths, as before I alledged the opinion and fay- ing of Anfelme ; but moft likely, J toilfome, and over- burthenfome work for one John Baptift, to have taken themfaft by the cloathesor ihoulders, and to have laid them down backward in rhe waters, and to h ave lifted them up again out of the waters, being now more heavy in their drenched garments, and to have fet them upon their feet again , furely John the Baptift would foon have been fpent that way, or had needed many other Baptifts under him, half a [core of fuch dippers as your Brother is., to have affi- led him daily and continually, to have difpatched fuch multi- tudes as da-ly and continually reforted to him. Amongft which great multitudcs,that came continually unfco him from all quar- ters of Jerafalem^nd Jade*, and other Regions about, I can- not but think that many fickjy, and wealth/, and difeafed per- fons hearing of the great fame of fuch a Prophet as John the Baptift was, who not onely preached the doctrine of Repen- tance, and of the Meflias come, or fhortly to come, but bap- tized into Remijfion of fin through the fame, came flocking to him, or were led or brought by others, as detirous to partake of fo great a bleffing and mercy before they departed the world, like as Mat, 4.24,25. And now can you think or imagine that %Un when he baptized fucb, would dip or immtrge them under Ffff2 wa- 4^ Chrtfi b) John, others by the Apo(tlesy net dipped' hut ajperjed. water, over head and ears, thereby to endanger their lives and in the curing their fouls of fin, to deitroy their bodies of life* when as with more fafety to them , and to as much efficacy he might onely afperfe or fprinkle them with water, or lay it on with his hand upon fome part of their body, or head rather. If farther you add, that it is laid in the original, that fohn bapti- zed, bt'u?*T;jnvMter, which he could not do unlefs he ftood and dipped them in water ; Say eft thou this thing of thy felf, or* did others tell it thee of him > I am fure you.could not fay it of your felf, who know nothing of the original but your fin ; (if • that) j and therefore for thofe others that told you fo of him,, tell them from me, that it is right enough tranflated and ren- dred to their hand if they can take it, with water, that Greek. particle os very often fignifieth, and is put for Ma. or ruVy with, or by, and that in theGofpel, as Mat. 26. 52. the) that take the fwordjhtfll perijb i» p&x^&ty °* with the fword, andfoX«^ 22.49. Lord (hallwefntitctb> (Mi%a.ipct by or with the fword > &£. But to draw up, if ^//# the Baptift was ia the River of -Jor- dan with the people that came to him, how was it poffible for him to ftand there in the cold water, all the day, and every day d pping and immerging their whole bodies in and under the wa- ter ? and if he was out of the water upon the brink or bank of fordan, how was it poflible for him, to dip and immerge with his hands,.the whole bodies of thofe and fo many as came to. be baptized? For whereas it may be replyed, that fohn came ftraightway up alfo out of the water j and therefore he ftood, in the water and baptized there, Mark. 1.10. if the words of ftraightway coming up out of the waters, refer not toChrift,. but to fohn , then its fpoken of fohn,. that he did fo after the baptizing of Chrift onely. At the baptising of others as they came and went m&yjjvbn ftirred not from them,buc difcourfing many things of Repentance, and Faith in the Meffias toeome,. both whilft he was baptizing them,& afterwards • and lb before tlicy departedout from him,' he inculcated to them of the Faith ScoftheFruitsof Baptifm,as^/^.3.8,9,io there is the fum of his inftruftions to the people fet down, which becaufe (ashe knew) Chrift had no need of, thetefore as foon as he had bap- tized him^he ftraightway came forth with Chrift out of the Water, and the rather to fee the Heavens opening, and the Sprit iltfc ending tips,* him like a dove jj and. fo further to/inftruci the people thereupon. _. Again,, — - '"" "■■■ ■■ • • ■ '■■■ — *• I John Baptift and the Apofila baptised iy afpcrfrg, &c. 45 - Agatn,if the people baptized,were dipped and immerged with their cloathes on their bodies, it was the more heavy ,too heavy a work to be done by onejif with their cloa'ths orTjthe multitudes coming confuting of men and women, & fomc(doubtlefs) weak and fickly,it was too dangerous a work tobe done & too immo- deft a^pe&acle to be caufed,or endured, by that holy and reve- rend Prophet of God. Hereupon my opinion is clear to my felf (but with a Salvo to the naked immerfions of the whole body by the Aneients,cited oneiy by me, to difprove the cloathed dip- pings of Anabaptifts to be the old way) yet notfo ftiff, but that it is ready to bend & yield to the fpirit of theProphets upon bet- ter evidence givcn,thatChrift & the people baptized of fohxamc indeed to the River j? were they dipped and immerged fo many bodies, in one day , by Peter and the Apoftles > how could they,if they had bin together in, or at a River? but where they were,gathered together in the City and in one place thereof , there was neither River nor Ten- tain ,nor Wels,nor Ponds,to be dipped and immerged in,in their whole bodies, neither is there any iyllable of their removing m going out of the City to Rivers or Ponds , and how then could they be fo many baptized there, but as I faid, by aff>erfmgvj2X^ upon them, or pouring water upon their heads : the very place;, and the perfons,the multitude of thofe who were to be baptized,, and the paucity of thofe who did baptize, do plainly evidence, that the 3000 were not dipped, but afperfed oneiy, at that great and fir il baptizing after Chrifts Afcenfiom No, nor Lydia ,- and her houfhold though by a River Ode abroad , when (he was converted arid baptized, was dipped and immerged in her cloathsror out of her cloaths-, and fo much lefs thofe other hou(holds,of grown perfons and profefibrs, baptized' in private by the Apoftles, as of Comdim, Stef>hanfts,&c, tMey : i fur 4$ JohnBaptifUfli the Apples baptised by afper fw^&c. or any of thefe cannot be faid or thought to be dipped and merged under water, in their whole bodies, cloathed or naked, without great inconveniences,difikulties, improbabilities, if not impofilblities , all which are, and may be avoided by the other way of baptizing. And thus,Sir,you may fee and feel too,unlefs you will run in- to darknes in the,-day time, & grope in the noon- day ,as in the night \ that there is no footing or bottom in any River or Pond in Scri- pture for your dipping and immerging baptifm. How dare you then cry this up as the onely good old way of baptizing, and de- termine that , and decree it fo to be , even the very practice of John the Baptift,and the very Atts of the Apoftks, and the mind of the Spirit , when as it never feemed good to the holy Ghofi , and to them Jo lay upon m no greater burthen then the necejfary things. of which, your immerfion and dipping is none, I am fure, a bur- den indeed,but not neceffary thing,fure if there had bin,or were .anyfuch nectffity , or but convenience thereof, to the perfecting and compleating baptifm , as that without it , baptifm (hould not be true and right as of old, the wutd that bloweth where it lift eth, and the Q>irit that breatheth where it pleafetb, would in fome place or other of theGofpel have blown and breathed out unto us fomething of it^ nay rather, hereof is a very great filenceof your dipping and immerging, though muchfpeech and pra&ice of baptizing. Chrifl: faith as ell'ewhere to thewinde, peace and be [till, and the fpirit rather holds in its breath, no words here are made,no cir cum fiances are given,no conferen- ces are to be drawn out for this dipping & cfivin glutting off or on of cloathes , laying or lying down in the waters of ponds as is ufed by you at your baptizing. But I {hall now tell you, that the winde bloweth fair , and the fpirit breatheth jirongly and fweetly , and that of old too, for our fprinkling and afper- ftvg Baptifm ^ and I perceive this found from heaven will come fuddenly upenycu, (before you looked for itj as of a mighty rujhingninde, andlwiftiit may fill all the houfe where you and your Brethren are fitting , and that you would take them, the Texts I mean,into your considerations (unlefsthey be all (pent and fent away to me in your Brothers Letter. wherein he gave mc fo many confiderations .) i . Now of tl ef; Texts, i . Some are Typical, as all thofe in the Texts of Scripture for [pr inkling Baptifm, * j the Pentateucb,efpecially, which fpcaks of the fprinkjing of th e blood of thefacrifices,a$Zf^»V. 16. i4.ThePrieft /hall take the blood of the Bullock^, and /hall fprinkle it before the Mercy -Seat. 2. Some arc Prophetical, and allude unto Baptifm, as that of Ez>ekcS6.2$. Then will I fprinkle clean water upon you, and ye /hall be clean from all your filthinefs ; by the which, I mean the thing fignified, in and by the Baptifmal-water , even the deanfing blood of Chrift, the which David airbed at, when he faid aifo, Xfafh me from mine iniquity, And cleanfe me from my Jin, and J /hall he whiter then J. now ,Pfal.5 1 . 2,7. 3 . Some other Texts are Myfiical and reprefent it, as Beb. 1 0.22. & 1 2.24. ye are come re fefus the Mediator of the New Covenant, and to the blood of fprinkling, that fpeaketh better things then that of Abel • and again, Let us draw nigh with a true heart in full a/furance, having our hearts fprink/ed from an evil con/cience, and our bodies wa/hed with pure water. Here is men- tion offp-inkjing, and wafhing,wit ha reflexion upon the pure water, or baptifm ; the which another Text {heweth, 1 Pet,. 3.21. where he nameth Baptifm, where having fpoken of the- eight fouls faved by water in the Ark, He faith, The like Figure vthereunto, even Baptifm doth now alfa fave us , by the refurre— Bion of Chrifi ; fo then, like as the 4kK *"aved Noah and his fa- mily by water, fo doth Baptifm fave us by water, by being wafbed and fprinkfed therev/ith, as they were in the Ark ^ for fo the Apoftle fpecifieth, and hath no words of dipping cr immer- ging, as aot conducing to the falvation of them, or of the Ark it felf, which may be a fifth Text or inftance, where that is faid to be Baptized, which was not dipt or immerged. Again4'v. 1 Pet. 1.2. the Apoftle there mentioneth the fan- clif cation of thefpirit unto obedience , and the f Crinkling of the blood of fefus Chrifi , as the inward grace, and thing fignified,. of the outward fign and water in Baptifm. Now wherefore in all thefe, or the moft of thefe places, doth the Spirit of God fet forth the manner of application of Chrifi s bleed, and the fpi- ritual grace by the fprinkiing it upon us, but to intimate the way and maner of mintftration of the Baptifmal-water,:he figct . and feal thereof to be by the fpringling and afperfing it upon us.. . Had you Sir, but fuch 2, Quaternion of S 'c/< ■ Idler s, as it is cal- led. Alls j 2.4. four fuch militant Texts to ftand up cni fight foe. 4 3 No Texts for Dipfing-Baftifm. foi- your dipping and immtrging, yea, or but an Vmon one fuch Text, I mean, in all the Bible, that did but carry the co- lours^ or bear up an EnjignJ a fign, or but the name of dipping (as they do of fprinkling) how would you glory and triumph as the Philiftines did when they had gotten Samfon into their hands j how would you call your friends and neighbours, your Brethren and Sifters together, efpecially the two laft dipped, faying, Come ft Joyce with me} for I have foond the piece that was loft, a Text for our dipping that was at a lofs. But it is fo ftill,and you are at a lofs for it,and may be at alas alfo for it! you may go light up a candle, and fweep or fweat too,and feek diligently, and yet not finde a piece of Scripture, one Text for your dipping and immerging into, and under the water, likeas I have found out fair texts and pieces ofScripture for our fprink- ling ani perfufion of water in the t;me and ad of bap- Thing. For as for that Text and piece of Scripture, Mcr». 6. 3, 4. & Ccl.2,12. (which are both one) that we are buried with Chrift in Baptifm y wherein alfo we are rifen with him •, I know fome, do defiant and difcourfe hereout^ of Immerfon into, Jmmoratkn under, and Emerfion out of the water of baptifm, but the Plain Song in this (as in other) Scripture is thisonely, that through baptifm, being truly ingrafted into Chrift, and made one with him, we are made partakers of the merit and efficacy of his death, and burial, antf refurrection (for thefe are included in that) to kill -and mortifie, bury and abolilh fin and natural corruption hi us. Though I add alfo this,that fuch reprefentation and operation of the death, burial,and Refurrection of Chrift. and of usfinners after his example'js not then at baptifm required of us,as which is accidental to baptifm, or fecondarily eflential ^ neither is it primarily nor properly, the inward grace fignified by baptiftn ; but the ablution and wafhing of the foul , and cleaning ic from the guilt and filth of fin in that Laver of Regeneration, is principally intended, and primarily effential to baptifm * like as the putting away the filthiners of the flefh, by cutting off the foreskin, was to circumcifion. And laflly, if it were fo,the burial and Refurreftion of Chrift, the main thing in baptifm, yet (hall we not need to infer hence, or J^— —111 ■ '"" "'" ' '<'•' " ■» II — , u J ... ■- Jgtinft abfttrfioti fif the fvater by Women or Midmves* tf cir to introduce hither the Rite of immerging and emerging which is your t«tal dipping , as which is refembfed as well and better in our manner of afperfion and effufion of water upon the party, though but upor a part , for when water is pour- ed upon, or is laid upon the head of the adult (landing on his feat, or kneeling on his knees, as likewife upon the face of the child, lying in the Arms of the Minifter, or the Parent or o- thcr prefenting it, are they not the while, as it were, buried in, or do they not lie under the water, as the buried doth under the earth ? and fo the party may be faid to arife as it were, when it comes or goeth from the water, as the body doth from the earth , or the Minifters dipping his hand into the water, and plucking it out when he layech ic on, may it not have the fame fignification with immerging and emerging , and fo of the Bu- rial and Refurre&ion of Chrift? And J think I may fay, our Church , in giving liberty of dipping or immerging and emer- ging of Infants (if not weak) did it not fo much from authori- ty ok' this or any other Scripture, as in conform ity to fome of the Ancient Chriftians and Fathers of -the Church, in thiscu- ftome, as in other lawful Rites they practifed, to which and whom I now come. Onely I (hall give but a tender and gentle touch of one thing that flowerh more naturally, or rather more myftically from the afore-alledged Texts. That it the baptized, his being /-w/Wwith Chrift in baptifm, be reprefeuted and fignified by the lying And abiding of the water upon the face or forehead, as a part of the body, and fo the body in that part thereof, its Jying and abiding under the water, even Co- inkled and poured upon it : Then fure it is not advifedly aid conveniently done by Gentlewomen and tender Mid- wives, tonipeofi the water from the part, and atfixrgc it with a handkerchief as foon as it is laid on by a Minifter, or by turning the head of the Infant (whom I fpeak for, that cannot fpeak for it felf) prefently downward, to caufe the water to foil iff tt, upon the ground. In all the Hiilory of Baptifm, from the beginning of it in fcr~ dan and Rivers to the prefent being ofvited,naked and out of the cloathsjhch was the Candid Ih- nocency & honefty of the old times, and for other reafons 1 have1 given : but you do dip your converts and profelyte^, covered and tn their cloatksfo? no reafons given by you,that I hear o^unlefs it be fear, left Satan tempt you to inconcinency , as thefe lav- ages are' very naught indeed and wicked. And yet I know,fome of the Ancients dipped & immerged but apart of the body in the water, this is not yet touched upon , and it will make fomewhac for what I have faid before , of fprinkling and pouring the wa- ter upon the head of the baptized. Augufiine in his -4. Ho mil. faith' (and fo he is cited of Gratian. decret. de cenfec. difiinc.4..cap.66. Poftqxam vos credere promififiis, tert'tb capita vejira infacrofente demerftmw,and this in the words following, he calls Ordobaftif- matis , it was the very order and manner of baptifm, after thdr confeffion,tW//> and immerge their heads in the facred Font. And before him Hiervni. Dial, adverfm Lnciferianos hath thefe words '■■ Multa qua per traditionem in Ecclefia cbferv«ntHrt au- thoritatem fibi fcript* legis ufurpaverunt , vclutin-Uvachro ttr caput mergitarejVo dip and immerge the head thrice in the laver of baptifm, he makes it a tradition of the Churchy and as Authen- tique as if is were a Law written-. And before Hierom, a little, a matter of two years , Chryfoftom upon thefe words of John 3 . Vnlefs a man be born cf Water and the Spirit Stith he, KaOa'wsp yeif (>V 77!'/ 7K0« TO U Mil VJJ.TO.fvWTUV tl{AUV 7U{ Mpuktif , 0 TA^OtOf avSpa. 'y©- SccTtJiTiu, >o n&TV.S'vi xj.iu> xpv7r}tT*i oh©* vgftiixdS, '(iwl etveenvoy lav vy.av9 h k£u/'< dtniTa wdhtv- To thofe who dip and immergt their head in the water, as in a fepulchre, the old man is buri . d and overwhelmed,^-. Yea,& before him Eunomius and his fol- lowers,^ ever the Heretiqucs like Apes, will be following fome Ancient Cufton s of the Church)who llarted up in the year 360 fiA^T.^cvnt-^ix^rav riprfflv,, TTt) vf&liSivw9 when they baptize, they wet them down to the/W/? , and i,o lower, (the word it not f.vujt or /o')*tf7.dip and immerge ftri&ly, but Sivwi, i.e. dew •©>• wet them, (it may be our Englijb dew, may be derived thence) ( and fo here by the way, may be a proof of the Antiquity of our afperfing or fprinkling,or£ftfc7)'/>£ the baptized) for which caufe, wheathey the Eunoraians- baptized ei( n'tKor, whkh is labrum , qmfi kvabrtiw; m a large and amfle vrjfeJ, fuch as they .ufed in bathes Of Trim Immtrfton^ and vohy left off, ■ 5 3 bathes or bucks,the party to be baptized {landing on the outfide or brim thereof , -nivrtTi *.&?&><»■, they bowed down his head un- to his brealt into the water,all this is reported by Theodoret.lib. ^.htret. fabularvmL&\y, before thefe, k is recorded of B.La.u- rcntius that he baptized one Lucillus r and the manner this, as the words in the Ads are, & cum expoliajfet eum.fuditfuper ca- put ejus, when he hadftript him of hisdoathes he poured (the water) on his head, thefe lived about Cyprians time, in the year 260 recorded by Suriw, tom.4. in the Hift.of the Martyrdom of the B . Laurent ius', But you, as you differed from fome of the Aneientsin dipping,, and immerging cloathed bodies,wheras they did them fo naked^ fo do you differ from fome other of themin dipping their rrk/r todies, down even to the.r feet, whereas thefe did but their heads: down to their breafts. 3. The Anciots , dipped thofe thrice, whom they baptized^ you had but even now the Teftimony of Hiertm and Aug r-.f /» e, a part of whofe words I referved for hither-, Qui or do baptifwatu duplici ntyfterii fgnificat'ione celebratur •, The order of baptizing-, with thrice dipping and mmerging,is famous in the Churches for thefe two myfterious fignifications , 1 . Of thrte Perfons of the Deity 2.0f the three dayes death and re'urre&ion^fome others add a 3 . of the three forts of fin cleanfed by baptifm,. offenc s in thought,word and deed (To which may fitly come in next 2V- tullian adverf.Praxeam cap.26-.Namnecfemelfed Ter,aA fingpja yiominajn perfonas fmgulas wergimur:1$ ^SoAthanafius in diH. & interpfcr. for making the thrice dipping an Apoftolical and neceflary traditiombut it's anfwered by Wbiuikers defc. cent. 1 qmji.6. and fo alfo by Rivet in his Criticus c^.20.(who both acknowledge they had it from Erafmtu in Ep'ifi. aa Johannem, Epifc. Culmenfem) that that Book de SpirirufavtlcSs not any true and genuine work of the great Baji/,but a fpurious and fup- pofititious one, efpeciaily in the later half thereof, by fome one that would be great in Bafil, and therefore though I cited a te- Itimony a little before out of the 27 Cap. of that Book de Spirits faptto , bearing the name of the great Baftl, like as Vojfrm and others do .yet I will not (land upon it (as I need not, having an- other Authentique one ftanding by him , which is that of Hte- ram Jfor that I hear of it by thofe learned above mentioned ,and read alfo my felf in that 27 Chapter, for though the words that I 5 6 Trine Immerfisn m Afoftolicdl Tradition orpr(ceft. I hivz cited thereout may bear a good fenfe b . themfelves , yet finding theiirift of chat 27 Chapter,being to equal,orto adjoin Traditions ( of which a great many are there named, and this .among t the reft) unto the written ivcrd of the holy Spirit , as Apjftclical and »ecejfan ,1 do fufped: thole words bcfbre(of pri- vate, and fecret or hidden do&rinc, as I rendred them, to bead and incline that way. Others, leflfe credible, Ancient Authors there are, who make this Trine immerfion, and Apoftolical tradition, yea precept, as FeI.igiusVa.pa., Anno%\Q. who is cited by Gratian de ctnfec. d'jl.q. can.10. makes it a precept in thofe words ( becaufe of the three Perfons named in the Precept ) Go baptise all Xatkns in the J$*\me of the Father, the Sen , *nd the htljf Ghoil ; and The 0- dw:tus,l.\. h.tret ,F ab^Ur.W^oh book is thought to be none of his,by reafon of fome fabulous things in ir.andfo this way gene* rally the opinion of the later Rcmxn Church, whilft they held to .the Trine-immerf:on,that it was aneceffuty Apcftlicaltraditkn; and the like (I belee/e) they are as ready to fay, now they have J?ftthac, of their Trine after [ton to which they have betaken themselves now at la ft. . And you alfo,andyours,are of the fame opinion/or your orce {lipping and immerging •, that it \$ of Divine prefriptkn and A- poftoiical tradition,who adhere fo peremptorily toit,difailowing and coridemning all of us and other Churches , who praftife •ai perfion and fprinkling , for heretical and antL hrijlian and out baptifm-, for unlawful and inval d. And therefore I (hall now alfo give you a little of' AntiqttL ty to \ for our fprinkling and afperiing of water with the hand, upon the party baptized, or our po.iring or laying on of wa- ter upon fome part, head or face of the feme , whereby it fhall be made to appear to be al fo, .: g W n . f of baftuJng. But (hall I need to add any more of 1 his ? I have given you already the Teftimonies of fome of the Ancients for the fame, ,'m the 'third difference I made 'twixt your and the Ancients di p> ping and immerging : and the Example of LAttreutii* fo ba 1- tizing Liscillw , by pouring water upon his head ; and fo alio he baptized one of dieSouldiers, who brought ZJrcct.rr. am aCjHd , and took hi* time, and offered it to St. Laurence^ that fo he might be that 'ouldier baptized of him • which couW be no The Antiquity of After fmg or Sprinkling, ^7 no Otherwife, then by taking water oat cf the Pitcher % or Pail or Kettle;, with his hands, and pouring it upon him, even his head : and this was much about Cj/>r/W time, in year 250. And therefore fure it was the practice in Cyprians time-, yea, and it was his very judgement given hereupon, to one by name Mag- «w,Epift.7<5. who propounded the Qtteftion to him, -whether the weak and fick, who could not be dipt, but were onely per- fuft, fprinkled or afperfed with water, were truly Chriftians, and obtained grace ? He anfwered, Let it not move any, qmd afpergi vel perfundi videantur pj-raned-ctt H}.ov i» A7:.Critf-': Aurp«VS*i , fo that thofe who are fprinkled and afperfed of them ("that is baptized) are rather polluted and defiled with ungodlinefs, (thenwaJJjed) forfo I think the word ought rather to be rendred, as having reference to baptifm Re- cording to the fenfe and purpofe of Athanafius in this pla.ee, then as Pctras Nannim doth(liedeemed:)for though the Greek word M>7f27-3-4/ , fignihe alfo to be redeemed, yet he {hewed him felfa true Tranflator indeed of the word in General, but H h h h not 5 8 The Antiquity of A\\ crfivg cr SJ tinkling. not fo good an Interpreter of the fenfe, nor word here in this particular, which alfo fignifieth, and here muft, to be wa(hedv for the reafon above I have given : at;d fo Vofftus faith elegant- ly as pertinently, polluere ait non ablv.ere, rather polluted then wafhed, as I rendred it, but that which comes hence to my pur- pofe, that Athanafm calleth and maketh f&pTtoitav fcxlufitv, the fprinkling and afperhon of water in the right form,, to be baptifmsand that it is good and truebaptifm which is given in that way and manner. But I can bring forth a teftimony far beyond thefe, for the Antiquity of ajperfng or perfufion in baptifm, and that is of Yertuflhttf, living about the year 1 90 lib. de pcenit, cap. 6. I deny not (faith he) but that the Divine benefit , Ablutio delitlcrumy the wafting of fin, fhould be ready and fafe to all that come to the water,and then he addeth,but they muft labour alfo to come thither , for otherwife (faith he) Quistibitam infidx p&nitentU viro, ajperginem umm cujujiibet aqua commodabit; if thou beeft a man untrue to thy repentance thou makeft , who will let thee haveorefprinklingof watery (in oppo(iti®n or allufion tothe Trine mmerfitn , as I fuppofe) and meaning that if he woukl not corn® to the waters being in health, to be dipt thrice, he de- ferv£dnottobecomeuntoiny?c^f/}, to be once ajperfed and. fprinkled: fo fpeaking plain enough, for Jpr inkling and afperfing the fick and weak efpecially, the which alfo Cornelius a Byfhop of Rome in Cyprians time maketh mention of, in an Epiftle to Fab.Antioch. which is in Eufeb.lib.6.cap.^ . where he likewise . relates of Novatus the Heretique, that when he was freed from the evil fpirit,and fell into a grievous difeafe, upon his bed defired baptifm,and fo was in his bed baptized J.e. perfufus aqua, by wa- ter poured &fprinkled upon him^This was fo cuftomary amongd the Ancient, to fprinkle and afperfe thejickjn bed ( if there they came to their firft converfion)that it was called Baptifmus Clini- corum, the baptifm of the bedrid, though they did not fo highly efteem of fuch as were fo baptized in bed & upon Jicknefsyyea.,they debarred fuch from being of the Clergy , becaufe they thought they become Chriftians rather of neceffity then goodwill. And becaufe I have mentioned fuch a thing, as the Baptifm of theClinicks, or fuch as were converted and baptized in their f cknefs and death beds3I will put you a Outre upon a fuppofition which Of Cli vtck Baptifm, 5 9 which often falleth out, knowing you will presently run to your mafter of quaeres for anfwer and refolurion. Suppofe one of your children, or his, or any your other bre* thren , who by vertue5or vice rather of your opinion, hath been kept and detained from it's baptifin during it's infancy and mi- nority, {hould be at 1 3 or 14 years of age , vtfited of God with ficknefs , and fo fcholed , and enlightned by him therein and thereby (iotfchola crucis efifch&la lucis) that he (hould come to a good meafure of knowledge of himfeifand God , of his fins, traduced at his birth, and committed in his life, of Gods mercies promifed in his word, and covenanted in Chrilt-, and fo lying in 2>^,under great diftempers, even fore-going death; fhould upon and after confeflion of his fins , and profeflion of his faith ia Chrift earneftly defire and require baptifm , as the Seal of Gods Covenanted Mercy , and as a confirmation of his faith therein^ and a ftrengthening of him againft the fears of death before and at his departure out of this world. What would you now do here ? Dare you deny ftill acid withhold baptifm from him in this condition , when as it may be and ought to be miniftred unto him? then will you be, and are you guilty before God of a plarn and palpable contempt , of the ordinance of baptifm , which is and will be damnable to whomfoever, GV». 17.24. Exod,^.z^y 25. And if you think it now needful for him to have baptifm,for that he is now capable of it , according to your Uwn tenet, and the t**: i« is now feizable, and poffible to be had , I ask how and yvhi y fhall baptifm be given and conferred unto him ? w ill you remove him out of his bed in his cloth es, or in his bed and its cloathes to your Fond?or caufe to be brought to the bed-fide fome big VeiTcl or Tub of water ( which later , is more then I need grant unto you , in the point betwixt us, ) and fo, either the one or the other way dip andimmerge his whole body in the cloathes or out of the cloathesf which is ftill more then I need yeeld? ) Then in all probability may and will you be guilty both before God and man of xht death and dejiruclion of the party , the which is and will be as damnable to whomfoe- ver- Now advife and fee what anfwer IJball return to him thatfent me- You cannot but fee and fay as Z>4t/*VoneeJyou are in a great Hhhh 2 firtigbr, 6o Of Clinick Baptijm. ftwght | 2 Sam. 24. 13, 14. For according to your opinion and pra&icc , you muft either let your child depart the world with- out baptifm, when it might have it, if you would, which will be prejudicial to your foul and your falvation , or you muft give it your dipping baptifm, which will be prejudicial to its body and its prefervation ,. as caufmg it to depart the world fooner then other-wife it would. The onely way to come out of your ftraights , is ftraightway to fall now into the hands of the Lord God (with David,) and (lay- ing down y 'Our imaginations , and every high thing of yours that exaiteth it fe If again fi the knowledge of God,) 2 Cor , I o. 5 . to sail for and fuffer fome lawful Minifter of God , to come, and after fuch confeffion and profeffion heard by him, or tcftified by others, to Afperfe or fyrinkle (In the Name ef the Fat Iter, of the So^\andofthe holy Ghoft,)& little water upon the face & fore-head of your child in the bed,gent\y wafhing therewith,by the moving of his hands , with prayer and Amplication before and after -y Thus doing,both dangers may be prevented^nd this was that, I with the Ancients even now called Btptifmus Clinictrum. How Ion* halt ye betwixt two ophions and thoughts,if the fprinkling or afperikm be baptifm , follow it, but if dipping and immerfion, then follow it. And ihe people (with their Dipper) anfwered me not a word.. I will but add one Teftimdny more, and that is, ofWalafri- diu Strabo.de rebus EccLcap.26. Notandnm yionjaluw mergen- do, fea etiam de fuper fundsndomultos bapti-zatos fuijfe , & adhue p-.jj'e baftizari. It is a thing to be noted, as it is notable, that ma- ny have bin form erly,and may ftill be baptized,not onely bydip- ping and immerging , but alfo by fprinkling and pouring water upon them, and fo he alfo maketh mention of the baptizing of St. Laurence out of a Pitcher or Pot of water, which was by af- perfion or perfuiion, and fo it was often (as he faith) when as the bignefs of the bodies of grown perfons converted, would not furfer them to be immergedand dipped in the Veffel,. their Baptifteries and Fonts being too little for them. And fo I have done my Ta whUh Anctmtr^ Coroll. i . § . utmmerfon and dipping in baptifm (cfpecially thricejas alfo Afferficn and fprinklmgh or rather perfufwn and pouring on of water , though but once,were both the good old way >, in the man- ner as they were done and admirtiltred by the primitive Do&ors and ancient Fathers of the Church. And to do the caufe and the truth, right, their immerfion was the older way, I fay not the better way, and is fome years older then their afperfion , as many years , as TertttUian lived before Cjfr'uin which by computation is not above two or three and fifty years difference or diftance betwixt their times. Yea, but I will recal that Verdid , and do reverfe that fay- ing,as whereby I do immerfion5and dipping too much right, and afperfion , and fprinkling too much wrong, as to their Births, Right and Originals: for 1 do remember a teftimony before cited by me out oiTertullianllb, deposnit.cap.6.'m thefe words (which , may be repeated here again without any Tautollogy , being to feveral and different purpofes and. proofs ) Neqne ego renuo divi- mim beneficium (i.e.)abolitionem peccatorumjnituru aquam^mni- , modofalvutn cjfe •, fed ut eo pervenire contingat, elabcrandumefi ; Quii enim tibi tarn infida pcemtentia viro^afperginem unam cujuf- llbet aqua commodabit? where you read and fie in plain and evi- dent words,that afperfion of the adult and grown perfons was in TertptlliaKs daycs alfo, and I might alfo now pafTe the Verdift, the other way, and fay, that immerfion and dipping is theyon- ger way , fome years yonger then afperfion and fprinkling, as many years as Cyprian is yonger then Tertullian, about fifty two or three. /'" "The truth then is, They were both of them , as twins (as E- fau and Jacob in the womb of Rebecca , Gen. 25.24. ) as two manners of baptizing in the Church of God , born much about the fame time,and, (as alfo Efau and Jacob did) they Jived and walked together a while,and fometimes lived apart, and af- funder^and the one was ufed in one place,and the other pra&ifed in another place , according to the diversities of the Churches, and difference of theages,and variety ofcuftoms,in,and amonglt them , and fo it continued for an eight or nine hundred years. PAit what and if (as it may be)immerJion0\\ke Efau, being indeed the more hairy y rougher, and harder manner, and way of bapti- zing and more j, raclifed of old, £ % zing, mighty out firfl and come forth into the Churches pra- dife, it was but a very little while before, for ajper fion like Jacob being indeed, the plainer and fmoother , and eafier way and man- ner of baptizing, foon followed after and at the heels-, Yea, as Jacobs hand took hold on Efkus heel, and after fupplantcd him of the blefling of his Birth-right, fo afperfion (if behind j over- took immerfion,and whoty fupplarthd it of rts primogenit ure -.and fo got away the blefling from it , to be the onely approved and pradifed way of baptizing in the Centuries fucceeding. For byreafonoffbme Tcandals in proceffeoftime given Or taken at their naked immerficns, cloathed a'perflons (as I may fo fpeak)or perfnfions of water,got in,& took place of it,and fo the elder ferved the yonger:\ mean the elder gave place,and both the Trine immerfion,aad the immerfion it felf was laid ahde-,and the yonger now, as being the more worthy gueft bidden,ts/ff down in that uppermofi place, I mean afperfion and pouring on of water.., is now altogether in requeftand pradife- efpecially amongft all the Weflem Churches (of which ours is a part and branch) in which the Gofpel moft flourifheth,and the Ordinances of Chrift, the Word and Sacraments, are moft reverently and religioully, and orderly obferved and adminiftred. And fo thus ( as I faid ) in our pureft and perfedeft Weftern Churches, for thefefive or fix hundred years laft part (! th nk, I am rather within , then without my Compafs) there have bene none dipped or immerged, no not in the old, once good way of the former times,publiqBely,authoritatively,nay,fcarce prefumptu- oufly •, until thofe Jjfricane (I wil 1 not fay Almfiers, yet were they cruel but) new men : for (Affrica femper z liquid apportat no- wjwho were your Progenitors and Predictors, the firlt dipp;rs and immergers in the Weft (the very place whence they and you arofe , is another argument to prove their and your bufinefs of dipping , a novelty and new thing, as coming from Africa origi- nally ) I fay until thofe Africane new men , thofe Egyptian fregs, that love to bepadling and dipping in Rivers and Pcnds, began to fpread themfel ves and skip up and down, and to bring forth Rivers and Ponds (as the Rivers and Ponds brought forth . them)or rather to bring their Perverts to Ponds and Rivers to be baptized. The which bold and prefumptuous attempt, againft the cwflant and uniform cuflovn of the Weftcr^ Church , began in . the t>4 Immerpon and Jftirfion both ufedts indifferent, the year 1524, and fo is not above an hundred and two and thirty years fithcnce ^ which is time enough, and litle enough. to make it Novelty in comparifon of Antiquity. Nay , your Brothers dipping and immerging is not fo old as theirs for your Ancient Fathers Nicholas Stork, or Stocky, and Thtmts Mancer, did not dip in your manner • nor is it as old as your elder Brothers, who about 1 3 or 1 4 year ago,ran about the Countrey ^ for they did not dip in your manner, in their cloathes, but naked , nor in Ponds, but Rive#s- nor do I think it is elder • then your felves were,in the day that you and they pra&ifed it, and begot it in the Parifh of MuchLekhsjiponthe bodies of the two Siiters you dipt and immerged in punt laft paft,and fo is but * a brat or bnod of yours and theirs, not a twelve moneth old yet by a good deal. CorolU 2. §. 2. When they were both in ufe, immcrfion and afperilon,the Ancient Fathers & their children had not any opinion of the ne- cejfity of either, as if the one or the other, were the onely lawful way of baptizing eftablrfhed by Chrift or his Apoitles, but they ancounted of them as things & cuftoms indirTrent in themfelves, and A&afketows and therefore to be left unto the liberty of the Church to ufe, or not, upon juft caufe and occafion , as may appear by fome of their fpeeches and practices , which I (hall here fee down,(though the proof both of this in part,and chiefly of t\\t former Corrolary in the whole, hath been touched upon, and even handled before. Grcgcr, lib. 1 . Epifi. Ep. 4.1**4 Leandrum Epifcopum Bifyalcn- fem-Rcprehenfible ejje nulUtenm pet (ft-, Infant em in baptifmate vel tercel femel immergere. It is no way to be found fan It worthy, to dip and immerge the Infant in bapiifm 5 either thrice, or cnce-t Yea , he giveth the reafons of both, and fheweth caufe, why he thmkethhtting to have thrice dipping changed into once, by reafon certain Heretiques made an evil conn1 rudion of the firft cuftom of thrice dipping , for that they divided the Deity into three Gods upon their thrice dipping.,/.?, in the Name of the Fa- ther, 2. in the Name oftheSon, 3. in theName of the holy Ghoftjfor which caufe , Bario modo tgnnt , aIU alios non baptitxtos ejfe contendnnt : lcaft whilft par- ties divided in baptizing feveral wayes, fome thrice dipping, and others but once, they fhould fay the one of the other , they arc not rightly baptized, and fo efteem each other fcifmaticks. And that this liberty was kept and obferved about this mat- ter, as alfo about immerfion and afperfion in Auguflines time, is to befeen in his 74 Chapter de Ecclef. dogm.BaptixAndus ( faith he J pofi confejfionem vel ajpergitur aquayvel itttingitur, The party to be baptized , after confeffion, is «'r^r afperfed and Jprinkjed with, or dipped a»d immerged in the water, and fo long before him. CyprianJib.q.Epifl.Epijiola j^ad Afqrnumt( whofe words I havefet down before ) fheweth his indifferency for either , and rather his defence of afperflon in baptifm , yet fo as that he leaveth it in the Churches liberty and freedom. What need I go farther then the Church of Rome, whofe An- cient pra&ife was to dip thrice in baptifm,fo their Gregory faith in the Epiitle above cited : Nos antem tertio mergimus , and that for reafons given before ; but now it is their maner in baptizing, thrice to fpr.nkle or afperfe,for what reafon they did before- (for none other they have given us ) fo by their later practice rever- sing their former, though their opinion be ftiikhe Tarn ; , that the Trine immerfion , is a mnfeript Tradition of the Apoftles, having alike force of Piety with the Scriptures and rtecefTary to be obfervea, which if it were fo,why did they alter from it? their own practice in changing of it , and ufing their liberty , doth refute their opinion of its nece/fity, or being an Apoftolical Tradition. Seeing then there i? no expyejfe precept for the one or the other, nor Apoftolical Tradicion for the one more than the J i i i other, 66 Yet the Immtrfion was laid donn, and Afperfiott held up, other, ( He is not Baft I tne grcat,and the true, but Baft I the little and the falfe or forged who fpeaks and writes of fuch a thing ) feeing alfo the true Ancient Fathers and Paftors of the Churches, fome ufed the one in their Diocefes,& fome the other manner of- baptizing in their Divifions, and both forts with an opinion of indifference? of the thing in it felf , and with liberty of pra&ifc left each unto other (as the affairs and the occasions of the- Church required^ of changing and altering.Who can juftly chal- lenge^ rebuke our Church of England, and the guides thereof, for holding and retaining either the one or the other, or both, (as (he doth in fome way and cafe) but betaking her chiefly, and^ molt ufy.aUy to ajperfwn and pouring on«water,and that but once, fo leaving both the Ancient Fathers of old, fome of them, and' the younger Fathers of Rome , all of them in the number of the Trin or thrice, for that the Trinity is Sufficiently enough, fet out in the very form of our baptizing, In the name of the Father, the- Son,and the holy Ghofl ? why ftjould any impofe upon us, or re- quire of us either the Trine immerfion at all,or immerfion at all conftantly and continually ,con(idering we are not of the Eaftem Churches, where the Clymate being hot , parties to be baptized might the better undergo the waters, and be dipt^ but we are of- the Church Weft cfny and our Church of the more Northerly - fide, were the air, waters, clymate, being coid, the tenderer bo- dies of our infants canmt be immerged or dipt , without evident danger to • their healths and lives. Have we not power to lay down an old cuftom as well as Gregory-, and Auguftine, and Cyprian ,or lonely, and Barnabas, the Minilters of the Church of Englandy have we not power to forbear dipping and immerging,efpecially whereit maybe fodangerous-& prejudicial? What though fome ancient Churches had fuch a cuftom of old.we have no fuch cu- ftom,neither r/?e Churches if God, now adayes,i Cor a \.i6. and when they .had it, it was but for a time, Temporary ■ it was but for an ufe upon an occafion, Arbitrary * it was not under a neccffity for , but w-th a liberty to other Churches. It is a part of the former Gregory his words (in tire fame Epililey worthy notice taking,/;; eadem fide nihil ojjicit fantta Ec- chfx confuetndo diverfa , where there Is the fame faith and an unity in it,a different cuftom in things indirTerent,nothing hurt- -eth or prejudicetluhe Church of God ;, as which hath power and; Ablution of Sin, ar well ftgni fed by Afyerfion as tmmerfion. 6 7 ;and authority to cnad and to abrogate fuch things • to be ob- served or omitted to all her Church children and mem- bers. And therefore, Sir, I have not , nor do cenfure and condemn you abfolutely for the one andfimple knmerfion , nor for immtr- jtou fimply and onely, but for your immerfun your fimple r**, an immcrfion that hath almoft nothing of Antiquity , being fuch at is every way diftant and different from the ancient immerfton in all things,but in ths, that your dipping was but once andfimple-, and alfo, for that it was a raft and prefumptmus undertaking of a few private Plebeians, and vulgar people, without any Lawyer Licence , or order of Church or State ^ fo far is it from any pre- cept , or prefcript , or Frefident of the Word and Scri- pture. I will be briefer in the next Corrollary , for it is time to have done about this matter. Coroll. §. §. 3 The nature of baptifm is but this,the cleanfing and wafting away the guilt and filth of fin, by the application of waters,ac- cording to the appointment of Chrilr, fignifyiag and exhibiting the blood of Chrift, that purgeth and purifieth that way^ and all the outward Sacramental actions thereof are but onely to repre- fent and fet out more lively the inward grace of baptifm, which is ftill but the ablution offin. This indeed, ablution and wafting •of fin, is necejfaryy/?f/;5.26.and fo St.Pavl tc\k the Corinthians, 1 Cor.6.U, Such-were feme cf you (foul finners)£#f ye arewa(ked,but ye are fanllifed,&c. in the Name of the Lord J e fits, and by the Spirit of our God. But the manner and wayof wafhing and ablution offin, either that way by dipping and immerging the whole body into, and under the water, or by afperfion, or perfufion, or rather fuper- fufion of water upon fome part of the body, this is not nece/Ta- : *ry,-but as I faid Indifferent, and Adiaphorous, and Arbitrary $xA fo not of the cjfence and/crw, but of the accident e and formality v rather,o'r iblcmnity of Baptifm : fo then if the ablution of fin, Iiii 2 wafhing 6g ihugh but apartsas Face, &C. be afperfe^ walhing off the guilt and tilth thereof, may be as well (if not better >re^reYented by a i per. on and iprinkling, a»id pouring on or" water upon fome part of the body, and gently rubbing on thek.ir.e , by the moving of the hand thereupon, as b\ the dip* ti, ig ,.-'k n irgin% ,and plunging of the whole body,into,and under thew«uers,and holding it fome while thereunder(as it rnuft be.) I add alfo,iftfAheaforefaidafperiion,orperfafion, be as effettttal to the good fpiritualends and purpofes of baptifm, as the afore- faid immerfion,l fee no reafon to the contrary ,but that both the ancient and modern,or prefent afperfion and perfusion ,orfuper- fufion of water, is as warrantable^ and allowable in baptifm f if not ftill more) as the fomewhat c.ncienter immerfttn, dipping and diving in and under water:for,as for any fuch modern or prefent immerfion,dippingor diving under water,as yours is,l acknow* ledge it not ; we have no fuch cftjlcm, mr the Churches ofGod^s I faid but now. It is true , the body muft be wafbed and wetted with water in baptifm, either one way or another , and that's enough for the truth and nature of baptifm^ now this may be, and is done, when we baptize with £prinkling and pouring water upon it,or part of it, and gently rubbing the flefh therewith, as well as by dipping andimmerging : And therefore we do not fpeakfality, when but fprinkling and pouring on water we fay we do b^pti^e^nd do not dip (that's your falfe fpeech,for though we dip not into the water, we lay on water and wafti , and therefore do ba- ptize. Oh but were it not far better , more agreable to Antiquity, and the benefit from baptifm more ample and large , if the whote body were dipt and immcrged, then onely feme part thereof, the facerforeheady or head afperfed and wafhed ? This is anfwered already •, that our way of fuperfufion, or afperfion with water, is as (ignificant , as effectual as the other, And as ancient within a few years , ( if any ) as the other way, yea, was in forte and life, amongft the Ancients, when the other was dead and gone -, and befides we are freed from it, where we will plead our freedom,becaufc we live out of the Bet Countreys% where it was bred and b«rn,znd was to be kept and maintained: in, thefe Northern parts of the world, where the Churches of God, cannot pradife or uleit ( I fpeak of dipping and immerging) with / be whole body and [out ts rv*(h ed. 69 with il;fe ty to our Infants healths and lives. But to the other part oi the object ion or doubt , I anfwer, and that from Anti- quity. FirftJ gave you but even now four (evcral Teftimonies out of four Ancient tat hers and Writers of the Church , how in the r times they poured water upon the heads of thofe who were ba- prized^ fo 1 gave you good probabilities, and more then fo, of John the Baptifts manner ofhaptizing of Chrift, and Chrifts A- poftles (moft of them if not all) and the great multitudes that reforted to his baptifm , by pouring water upon their heads ; were not all thofe as amply a.ndfujficiently baptised, as thofe who had their whole bodies dipped and immerged under water ? and were they not as fully partakers of all the benefits and effeds of Baptifm ? In the Arkj»en the eight finis ( the Epilogue of the Worfd, and the Epitome oftheChurch^W/y water-^The like figure whereunto even baptifm, doth now alfofave us, I Pet. 3.20,21. Now then, as the Ark being wafhed with water but inapart of it , whether that which was immerged under the water , or that which was afperfed with the rain that fell/avecUhe Churcjh then : fo baptifm doth the Church now, though but xpart of the body, as the head, or face, or fore-head be either immerged and dipped , or afperfed antf fprinkled with, the water in bar ptifm. And good reafon for it,, becaufe by .and from the Divine In- ft itution ^ the Raptifmal-water^ is blciTedv fan&ified , and im- pwredof God and hi* gracerto be the abtutio».axdwaJbwg of the ■whole man, body and foul, though it be applied in the outward fi- gment,, but toipart onely of the body, and fo received but ofa part^it being fo in this myfticaljsit is in fomef/77/H-rf/foveraign Dofes and Receipts, which being taken onely at the month , and into the fiomach, diftufeth its healing vigour and vertue unto the whole.body -, though not here in baptifm by any natural and felf-operation in.:thi«,but * gracious, and the fpirits difpenfation i fo. then though the water, which in baptifm i*poured onely up* on the fore - head or face, doth reach to , or flow down to all the whole body, in the external Ucjuour, to walb and wetit : yet in the internal vertue and efficacy , which the fame hathfrom th e Inftitution and §enedi&ion o£God> it cxtendeth to a total ablu* ticft 7o A handful of water asfufficient to baptize yas a Pond full. Hon of the party baptized, fo that itgoeth over all, body and Joui too, even to an internal ahlt+tion of the foul chiefly, as being principal in fin, and all this itill by the force and vertueof the Divine Ordination of the water hereunto. Seeitalfo from the Anakgy that Baptifm hath with Circumcifion-, I know you are never willing to hear of that Circumcifion, but you (hall hear of that, whether willing or not. In Circumcifon^ there was but one part of the flefh, the foreskin was touched and cut off with the Knife, yet it was, and is fo called, the putting away the filth of the flefh, the vrhle bed) avdfohl, for that the venue and effi- cacy of that which was done but to a part, redounded alfo, by Gods appointment , to the wbdle , even to the Circumcifion in hea*t, and ears, and 'lips, as the Scripture every where fpeaketb. Now in Chrift Jefus alfo we are circumcifed with the Circumci- fion made without hands,inputingoff thebodyofthefinsofthe -fiefh, CV/.211. that is, we are baptized, with the baptifm of Chrift jto the wafhing away 'the Cms of the body and foul • and therefore though "but forne one-part, and the fit i eft part the head, or fore- bead,or face be onely externally fprinkled & waftied with the water thereof-, ye: the baptifm is valid and effectual to the Uhfion inter nail) 'Oi t befoul aMb,and all the tody alfo,virtuaMy fome way according to his ordination. Laftlylthinknotthe meaner of our Baptifm , by reafonof our but handful of water , and our butfprinkjing or pouring on oFit upon the face and fore-head-, or the better of yours, by rea- fon of your Po;;d-fi.ll of water,and your immerging and dipping of the whole body therein : No Ordinance of God is to be -efteemed more or lefle effectual ^ for either the ?nore or the left ofthe Infirument or EUmrnt^for God-ufua'Ily,and more ufoafiv favcth with 9, fere then w,&V,t' JVw.14.6. with little, then with great-^hut fo all power might be known to be of him,fo zWgl.rj might he to titw, Rom. 1 1 . 36. as who is the God of the Valleys as well as of the Afcur.ta'ws, 1 Kings 20. 28. Thisistrue,efnecially in myfticaland fpiritualOrJinarccsand •proceedings, which 'halve his Inftithticn and BenediElun upon their; a* I havefhewed in Circumcifion, and may do the like in the Lords Svpper, where a fmal uort'ur; of bread, aad a little pr- ■tcme of wine, a mcrfel of the one and zfdctrfol of the other, are asfgni ;icanr ;&as effectual ro a fpiri'tunl and interna! refctlicn of the A havdful of Wattr asfuffcient to baftJze}as a Pond full, n h the Communicant, as if a whole hafot the one,and a fuIlCup of the other (hould be given and taken. So alfo in baptifm a few drop of water r or a little handfull of it fprinkled and poured on the face or forehead of an Infant or other ,is-as reprefentingof.and as working to a fpiritual and in- ternal ablution of the baptized,., as if 2iwhck pail full of tratir- fhould.be poured on ,. or the whole body of the Infant dipped- and irnmerged into a River full of water, after the cuftome of tlie Eaftern Churches. I will onely add to this point a Teftimony or two of Antiqui- ty i.ChryfoJlom writing inhls 6- Hcmil. upon the 2 Chapter of the Colojf. and thole words in the u Verfe, In rrhomje are cir- cumcifed with the Circumcifion made without hands, in putting i ff_ the fins of the bodj \&c. buried alfo with him in Baptifm. Hehath- thefe words: "Of ift-Jo-cnv »//*? ww i%voy ^itni^-Vti ozoy.a. ^ tSto , auyLo, yJx.{ivo, atAAa tb \ii» cm^y.i , to Si Tniv^cLTtitSi jr&tmy.vmtu 3 akb.' in <»( 'laJ^dta » }df o~dp<& > d'Ah' di-t-ATHpaAtt &vify-J\v m&z rr'oTe , Kctr n* y iv 7w fa-flifjizlh I lhall not (land to Engliih all, the ef- fect of all is this;that both in Circumcifion. and Baptifm,thougrr theAW.in th'eone doth But. cut off a part of the flefh, as the /cr^-/^;Vrwith a fmairknife,ancTin the othe'Yponr on a little wa- ter but upon forhe. part of the body, as the tore-head, the whole body of fin may be, and in theEleft is cut off (put oflfin the A- poftles phrafe) and walhed away in both Sacraments, by a fpiri- tual operation of C lirift, So alfo for the other Sacrament the Lords Supper^tbeing one of the Popifh evafions for their not giving the wine unto' the people, by reafon of the great quantity of wine would be fpent, upon the numerous multitudes of them, that would then therather come and drink great draughts ( which (hould not' have been thought upon here by them, feeing at other ordinary feafts and banquets they ftand not upon fuch charge, nor are ( K*y.&&9 pd* »3U* pAi^o? llfe'yw* fW# Sfcf *»* «V TAJXTi/OVMK, « A>/ «V et}itffftay , For this cawfe we take not war/; but little (of the Bread and Wtnej for that we know , we take them not to or for fatiety^ buz fanftity. The like whereof is,that oiEucherius Serm.% Je Pafcha^Excha- riftiafacra perceptio nonitt qurtntitatefedin virtttte confiftit, quod corpus facer dote dijpenfante ytantum eft in exiguo, quantum ejfe con- fiat in toto. The participation of the holy Eucharift, Aands not in the quantity but efficacy , for that the body (of Chrift) when the Prieft difpenfeth ( the fame holy Eucharift,) is as. much in a little/^/- (of the Wine and Bread) as in the whole toge- ther. 1 have indeed faid the more of this, as being (in my opinion ) very needful and neeeflary^-to ftrengthen, and arm ourfelves and our people , againft the dangerous tentations of the Devil wherewith heandhisinftruments (which are many in thefe dayesjdo mainly aflault the mindes,and fcruple the confeiences and pervert the faith .of the weaker amongft us; (as indeed, they have done to your felf, Sir,by your leave J He as he goeth about the earth rearing jlmI they biffing, as they creep into houfes, that their and your fyrinkledbaptifm was no true baptifm^s being but a little water poured upon your face , but onely one part out- wardly •, and telling you , if you will be baptized indeed, and to purpoie, you mull be dipped and iramerged in your whole body, and in every part outwardly-, that your whole Jpirit, and foul And body , may be preferved blame lefs againft the coming of the Lord, i Thefr.5.23. Thus they together ha vecaft Afnare upon you, they have fnared you intcj their nets,a-nd caught you with force other filly Fry, (as the Spider hath the ftmple Fly ) and have dipped and doufed you ir/ your cloathes under water, you being in their nets, (the devi^in a corner laughing, fnearing and dan- cing the while over you, even as the Spider doth winde up, and trufs up the Fly, being come into its Cobweb, and then skips leaps, and runs aooutit and (which I may mark,) fucks and feeds upon thr poor Fly. Well Sir, if you be w lling to come to the acknowledging of the truth (as J am zealous to bring you to it) and to recover your felf out of ihefnare of the divel, who ar$ ta. k?» Beware $f the fnares of Sat An. f^f ken captive by bint, and others, at his will and theirs, 2 Tim.2.2^ 26~readtconfider, believe the Truth I have fet before you^but read with impartiality ,Vf'ithout prejudicatenefs. Confider with indiffe- rency, without precipitancy •, and believe the Truth with fubmif- fion without reliitance : and with many other words have I tefitfied the Truth fin the anfwer of your Brother before, as well as in this anfwer to you) and have exhorted, and do exhort, faying, Save your [elves ,efpeciaUy fave your felf from this untoward (and fro ward) (feneration, Ads 2. 40. And if this be not enough that I have faid, read on ft 11^ for I have fomewhat more to fay unto you, as willing that you Jhould not peri (h, but. come to the knowledge of the Truth, and the ac- knowledgement of your Errors : for fo alfo there is fome- what more that you fay to me in your Letter ; thus you write, further, Sir, I wonder how you dare to fay that you do imbract the Truth as it is laid out by fefus • did Jefus ever lay down, that a man fhould learn the Latine andGreekjTcngue, and fo to a TJni*- verfiry toread Philofophy, and commence Bate he lor and JMafer of Arts, and Bate he lo- and Dittos of Divhiti, andfo come to a Pa- ri ft, there to take a Living from them, to the value of IOO l.per annum, more or hfs, they nilling willing, and there file kimfelfthe Minifies of fcfus Chrifl ? Did ever Chrifl Uy down , that yon Jhould take a little water andfprinkle it en the face of an Infant, and fay you dip them in the Nam 9 of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghcfl ? did ever Chrifl lay down, that his Miniflers (hould be hk peoples Maflers, as Lords over Gods Heritage ? Did Chrifl lay down, that ycu fljould take a Parijh, a Church ; and to than cafi the holy things of the body and blood of Christ, as unto a company, ma- yijof them (ifn'A the nnflof them) no better then dogs ? I mf felf having been one, who was not fh good as a dog, till the grace of God appeared, plucking me out of my wicked wayes to the knowledge of the Truth (which yon fear J have not owned.) But the day will difcover, and God will judge between you and us, Here is fluff indeed , enoagh to make an onely Englifh-man tofpeak Greek and Latine of purpofe, to declare the vanity of luch words againft Languages , like as the Sedentary Phi- losopher did presently arile and walk about, to fttew the folly of him , who before him denied motion ; Quis expedivit Pfittaco fuum y 1 «, Picafj; docuit mfira verba conari ? J wonder Sir, where you tearned.tofpeak. thefe our words,, to fpieout Kkk.k . . our 74 The Numtors vanity frown and confuted. our Liberties, yea , to Pie and Parrat out our Tongues, Degrees and Learning oS thellniverfity, your felf never living there', and now converfing with the Antipodes to the fame > Auditum, fpetlatum admiffi rifum tencatu amici\ Truly friends and Readers (To I would join you, for that 1 know, all Readers of me, will not be friends with me) I had not written out this pafTage, but that I would at the clofure of my anfwer,. prefent you with this fpectacle of ridiculous fluff to movefome mirth in you- (Tor there is nothing of Oracle or folid matter in it, to take up any of your ferious eyes,, ears, or thoughts.) Thefe indeed having been carried now a long time, even unto wearifomnefs and. tedioufhefs I fear, through the wafhes,deeps and dippings of Ponds and Rivers ► it is time to bring you now to a fire to warm and dry you, and in good time be it fpokenT as done : Here's 9.nig;iisfutuui, &fmoaking fire-brand, a fparkc lingfquib, a blazing Comet , a crackling thorn-bujh (enough to* fmutch a whole Univerfity ) but fear nothing , deefi igni*yt there's no fire under the words, nothing but a litck flafli, and fume, and new light, a noife, vox preterea nihil, if you cannot warm your hands at it, yet clap your hands at it, and (bout, and laugh at it till you have warmed'and refrefhed your felf fufficiently,whilftl go on with my'anfwer to fuch words, for there is nothing of matter in them, and ffoew the vanity of va- nity in them alfo, and all to be but vanity here. Sir, How dare J oh fay you embrace the truth litid out by- fe- fm ? did ever fef>x lay down, that a man (hould go to School, and learn his Accidence and Grammar, and fo to a Scrivener to write a good hand, to cypher and call account, commence a fhop-keeper, or Grocer, and kt up fhop, and fell by the pound Figs and Currens -(being never brought up to the trade/ in the parifh, they nilling, willing,*o make a living to the value of he knows what, more or lels, and there fltle himfelf a Brother and. Teacher of Jefus Clirift > but this is nothing. Look about you all Apprentices, How, dare you fay, you em- brace the truth as it Is laid out in f-efos ? did tver'fefm lay down, that a manfhouldgo up to London, binde himfelf to fuch a Trade for feven or eight years, and after a Trade learned, and. his years of Apprentilhip ferved or-.t, to get himfelf made a- Tree ma,a, and then to Commence Merchant or Tradef matter^ after Divers degrees ejr orders in ChurchJUnherfities^ Commoywealth. after that, to come to be Warden of his Company, and fo De- puty of a Ward, at laft to rife to be an Alderman, and Lord Major of the City, and get a great eftate there amongft.the Citizens to a value of iooo\. per annufPi, moreorlefs, they nil- ling, willing, and then ftile hisifelf a Citizen of London ? Once mere, look about you Lawyer .<•, How dare you fay, yopt embrace the truth as it is laid out in Jefus ? did ever jeftu lay down, that a man fhouldgo to the Inns of Court, learn the Latine and French tongue, and there read Magna (harta , the Reports and Cafes, and fo Commence Barrifter and Councel- lor, and lb Serjeant of the Coife, and laftly, a Judge of Aflize, and fotakcFees from the Clyents forCaufes, to the value of divers ioo 1. per annum, more or lefs, they nilling willing, and there ftilehimfelf aCouncellour at the Law. But why do I intermeddle here? The Narrator or Relator meaneth not me fure, for that he fpeaketh of fome Do&or o£ Divinity,who might therfore do well to doctrine a little better, yea, and difcipline the Indod young-man.But if he be not indo- ciblealfo, me thinks myfelf,but a Batchelor of Divinity, and but an ordinary Paftor or Minifter could do the one, dodrine him fufficiently (\o go to no higher degrees for this, and leave the other of difciplining him to the higher Powers.) •< Nay, even a Batchelor of Art (to go fo lowj) nay, I be- lievefome Sophifters of a Colledge (not to trouble any of the degrees at all of the Univerfity, in fo mean a work) can tell you, arid will tell you, in anfwerto your Audacious, bold fae'd, dating interrogations. i. That as there are in Scriptures laid out by Jefus Chrift, orders and degrees of Truth, fo alfo a Truth of orders and de- grees, even fuch as are in our Church and Universities : See for your learning, Eph. 4.8. & 1 1, 12. When />f, Jefus, afcendedup on high yhe gave gifts unto men, (diverfities of gifts) and there- fore he gave feme Apc$iles,andfome Prophets, and feme Evan- gelifis "and feme Pafitrs and Teaehers, or Doctors, (diverfities *>f degrees) for the perfecting of the Saints, for the work^of the Minify y, for the edifying of the body of Ckrifl, till we all come uxto a per feci manure. Are all Apofiles ? art all Prophets ? are ail Teachers or DoEtorsjkz > There is that whole Chapter, 1 Ccr. 1.2. to this purpofe, to (hew the diverfityof gifts, and degrees Kkkka " of 75 Of Degrees , Languages and Arts, of Officers in the Church, from the foot, hand, eye, head of the natural body, and the diver fity of the parts thereof j infomuch that the fame A poftle faith, i Tim.$. 13. They that a fed the office of a 1>eaconwell, fur chafed to themf elves a go§d degree , thatis,aPresbyterfhip : and howfocver you think otherwife of it, Jefus himfelf , as he was prefent at the marriage in Cana of Galilee, fchn 2. 1 • to countenance that eftate and degree of Ma- trimony, fo he. fate in the midft of the DoEhrs, Luke 2. 46. both hearing them, and asking them cjueflions, whereby he alfo Authorifed'thd.t degree alfo, and all other interior and fubordi- nate degrees tending tl ereunto. So it is laid.out by Jefus , bctb inNature and Grace alfo, as that one Text fheweth, Mark^^. 2S. The earth bnngeth frtb fruit of her J 'elf , firfi the blade, then the ear, after that the full Corn in the ear, and then when the fruit is ripe, he putteth in the fickle, becaufe the Harveji is come. . Are there not mentioned in the Pfalm 62. 9. Men of high degree, and men of low degree? and doth not fames bid//;e brother tf low degree re Joyce in that he is exalted ? Jam . Ivo* Will not you do the like, who are now but a Brother of low degree, rejoyce when you are exalted, to be a Preacher, and then a Dipper, who is with you ; a Brother -of higheft degree ? You have been a Surveyour in your own Pari(hj and then Overfeer, and now ha- ving a little better regulated your houfe, may hope to bea,Cc»- fiable to.rule the Town, and alfo you may rife to be a Church- warden, but that you have forlaken your Church , and the Church, if that will exempt you, and now then, why are you foagainftourbeing.Batchelorof Art, and then Matter, andfo Batchelorof Divinity, and then Doctor -, which arc our de- grees of the Univerfity, like as the other are your, degrees of the Countrey. . 2.: He can tell you, that Jefus indeed hath laid down expref- ly and abfolutely in particular Texts & words, That a man muft ferve and worfhipGod,onely in Spirit and Truth,and place his faith & confidence in his promifes, and repent of all finful ha- bits and acts, and what are his duties to God and man, in the place and calling that he is of, with all other particular and ge- neral matters necejfary to falvatitn, and of moral concernment. E>ut for other things that, arc of an inferior alloy, and but of Ceremonial . philofophy^ Greek and Latine, 77 Ceremonial, or Temporal Circumftantial nature, he hath laid them down onely incluftvelj and refpeclively, in fome general rules and dittates, of good order and comelinefs, upon a juft occafion or need, unto edification and for good ± and fo left them to common Chriftian reafon, and humane prudence to un- dertake and profecute according to the fame: amongft which things,are thofe that you except too, education in the Uni veri- ty ,ftudy of the Greek and Latine, reading Philofophy, taking Degrees, Titles of difcrimination, getting Preferments, diver- sity of Orders, &c, of which you may read more particularly and largely in my book before, if you defire to be a Scribe h" fir-utled to the Kingdom of heaven, in fuch particulars. Onely I will either add here, or repeat here (fearing yOu will fcarce be at the pains (for fo it will be to you pains) to read it) that the learning of the Latine and Greek tongues (you might have put in the Hebrew tooj if you had been a true Ifra- elite) and the ftudying of Philofophy , and other Arts and Sciences, and the taking of the feveral Degrees (which are the honours andgarland* of the Universities, which they give to Proficients accordingly, to make them firft Students , then Gra- duatis) all thefe are very ufeful and beneficial, not onely as the prefent aliments and encouragements of thofe Arts and Scien- ces, but thofe Arts, and Sciences, and Languages, are good for- tifications of the underftanding, and the enabling of Reafon , yea,and of Faith too, to encounter with Atheifts,Heretick8 and Schifmaticks, ftrong preparatives to the expounding of the Text of Scripture, being written in two or thofe Languages, and a fuller qualification unto the work of theMiniftery, to do it fo as not to be afhamed through ignorance, arid fay the book is fealed and he cannot read. Sea. 3. . But particularly for the learning of the Greeks and Hebrcyr Tongue, did not Jefus lay down, that a man, I mean an inter- preter and difpenfer of the Scripture, (hould karn them? he laid it down in the whole Scripture,for that hecaufed the whole Scriptures to be written in thofe original Languages :befides that,the Title and Superfcription which Pilate wrote, and put on theCrofs (Jefus of Nazareth the King of the feres) was ivri- teninHebrevr3andin Greeks gnd in Latine, John- 19. fo, 20. guiied-i o U mverfity -learning approved from the ' - — ■ •* — ■ t--; ■ * guided therein , even by Jefus, and confirmed in it, that what he had written, he had written, and would not alter. And again, for the learning of Philofophy and the Arts, and going to the Univerfities to do fo, and that in order to the Mi- niitry, did not Jefus lay it down in Scripture, when as Saul (for fo he was then) .is called by Jefus, a chofen vejfel, to hear his name before the Gentiles, and to the children cf Jfrael, and in pravifim of, and froz'//7o» for that calling, was by the lame Divine mer- cy ordered to be trained up from his childhood, in the famous City and Vniverfty too oiTarfus, where he learned both Law wages, fitting him to bear the name of Chrift, to both Nati- ons, the lews and Gentiles -, and likewife the* Arts, as Philofo- phy, and the reft enabling him to difputation with, and confu- tation of all the learned Philtfephersof the S tricks and Epicure- ans, of another famous Vniverfty of Athens. Yea, and Paul himfeli maketh it as an honourable mention of himfelf, that he was b-tK born id Tt.rfi.s, a City in Cilkia , where (there being alfo a Uaiverfity) he learned the grounds and principles of Arts, as alio i ra git pptn the City cf ferufalem , at the fert of Gamaliel, a potior oftjop Law, and taught according to theperfebi manner cf the Law cf the Fathers, Acts 22.3 . I {hall deiire the learned Readets patience a while (not much caring for your, or any others impatient ignoranc e) that 1 may here alfo bring in a fhortHii^orical proof of Univeii*it\ -learn- ing, from the perfons and practice of the ancient Fathers and Divines in their times and fucce/iions, as I have d.*ne before, produced their practice and cuftomefor Jnfant-baptifra in their d ryes and ages;, I will felect. out of them but fome, the moft remarkable, and that briefly. Fnlgentiuo, an AfTrican by birth, was brought up firft by his mother in the knowledge of the Greek^and Lat'we Tcngue, wherein he was excellent, and after (though but young ) got to fee admitted into a Cloy fte? or Monaftery, of which, Faw/Fw a French Bi(hop had the overfight, and there lead a Students life a good while ^ and being driven thence by the Vandals perfe- cting the Chriitians, he got into another Cell, where one Fe- lix governed^ and driven thence by the Barbarians, he went to Rome, and into Sardinia, where he fetled himfelf, and taught and intruded Chrift lansreforting to his Cell in great ftore. But fraftice of the Ancient Fathers, &c. ~Z But Fanftus the Bifhop called him from that his privater Ufer and made him Brief, and not long after, Bijkcp of Ruff a , a great and populous City. Once for all I (hall fay, that Mcm- fieries and Cloyfters were fuch as our Vniverfities and Co/ledges are,for ufe I mean,iwhere many Bifhop s had their Seats, and the cverfightof them, for the training up of Students in the Arts and Sciences, and fo alfo Divinity and Theology. Auguftine an AfTrican alfo by birth, wasfingularly well lear- ned in the liberal Arts , fo that he taught Grammar in his own City of Thagafta, andRhetorickin the head City Carthage -, after going to Millain , he was appointed to inftrud the Em- peror Valentinian, ( being the fifth of that name) and being fomewhat tainted with the Kerefies of the Manachees, he by thewifdom of Ambrofe , Bifhop there, and by his Sermons - and Difputations in publick, of which he was a diligent hear- er, was converted from it, and Baptized by the faid Bifhop r and after he was ordained a Friefi by Valerius, Bifhop of Hippo, and fo after a while, with the eonfent and defire of Valerius ,be- ingold, was in the life of Valerius \ created Bifhop of the fame Hippo. Chryffiom a Grecian, born at Ahtiochywas brought up in hu- mane learning, under Liban'ms the Sophifler, or Philofopher, fpent fome. time in fecular affairs, and after entred into the Brief hood at fintioch^2A made Governor of the Church there3 . and upon the death of Netlarim was made Governor or Bi- fhop of Confantimple. The Hsftorians fay of him , that Hdincfs and Scholar Jbip were joined in him, that he was excel- lent, and powerful, and judicious in Morals, or moral learn- ing. Gregory Nyjfen%a Grecian, brother to the other Gregory Na- zMU&en , addi&ed himfelf much to the ftudy of Rhetoric ^,and was eminent therein above all of his-time-} who for the further- ing of himfelf in the ftudy cf the Arts, and all learning, em- braced a Mcnafical life/ highly refpected in the Ancient times, . for the caufe above mentioned)that he might alfo join Theolo- gy to his other knowledge : and after he- was made Bifhop of JVyffa ("of which City he tookhis namej and even after that al- fo, addicted himfelf much :o hi; former ftudy of the Arts,efpe- cially Rhetoric!* , until his 'brother Gregory Nazkn^n in an - - Epftie 8o Univirfity Learning approved from the Epiftle to him, reprehended him for folong flicking upon the fame. Ambrofe, a French-man by birth, was brought up at Rome (then a Nurfery of the Arts and learning) where he gained wonderful knowledge in the liberal Arts ( that place being thea as the Academy of the world) giving himfelf to that ftudy. Probus, then Prator , taking notice of him, and the fame of his learning, made him €jovermur of Infubria, Liguria, and J5- milia •, after going to Millain, and Auxentius an Arrian Bifhop decealed, He was cryed up both of the Arrian fa&ion as well as the Orthodox, to be, and was created or made Bijhop there. ^Epiphanius, a Phoenician born, learned the Hebrew Tono-ue of one Tryphon a Jew, and was put to School to HiUrion, to learn the Artsfpoyzdacerrimnsh&retkorHm oppngnator^nd was made Bijbopcf Salamnc. Gregcriv.s Naztanzjen^ a Greaecian born, was bred up in Hh* mt.ne literature , at the Univerfity of Athens, and fpent thir- ty -years in thofe Studies^ proved a great Phihfp^er , and the moft eloquent Orator of his time, and was furnamed alfo of th^Grxcans dio^oy^r^heclogUs, or the Divine -y Hewasi?/- /frcpErhofSafijM, then of Na*jan<*n , both in Capfadcd^ and laftly of Ccnfantimple. BafiliMs, born alfo a Grecian, and contemporary with Gre- gory, was alfo bi ought up in humane literature at C afar en firft, and then at the Vmverfity of Athens , under E«bulus hisMa- . fter,aHeithen, whom he afterwards converted to the faith^ and coming to Libanius the Sophiiter, and a School-matter, who thought to have poied him with fome hard and difficult verfes of Heme r, he expounded them with fuch readinefs and W(t, that he aftonifned Libanius , and when he could not Con- vert him from Idolatry to Chnitianity, he gave directions, to the young-men his Scholars, concerning their deportment in their Studies. He was furnamed y-iyn^ Bajil the Great, and came to be Bifiop of C afire a and Cappadccia. Athanafms, a Grecian born , was brought up by his Parents in learning, and excelled in all forts thereof; was ordained Deacon , and received the order of Prirfthood about what time Arriia began -to broach his heretics , to whom Athanafms was the crcateit opponent in the Nicene Councel. Was after cbo- lcn fratlict tf the Ancient F*t hers foe* g j fenBiJhopof Alexandria, by the general fuffrages of all the Churches there, and by the laft Will of his Predeceffor there. Jrenaus, a Grecian , was a general Scholar in all Humane learxtig. as himfelf (heweth by his refuting the Hereticks in ail their Sophifticated arguments, fhewing them to be fetcht on- ly out of the Fables of Poets and Philofophers, and. therefore himfelf muft needs be well verfed in them, as who wittily ufeth their Proverbs. Exhortations, and Examples to the confutation •f them and their errors : whom therefore Tertullian ftiles om- nium doUnnar urn curiofffimum exploratoremHsv/zs after Bifljop 9f LjfitlS. And as I have (hewed this truth in the famous Bifhops, fome of whom I have made choice ; I will do the like in three or four of famous Divinesxmely, and not Bifhops, who were quallified at hrrt with Humane learning. And I will go downward as I went upward before. fhjiiMs Martyr , was a Palaeftine bom, and was a moft acute Philofopher, ^ Philofopiae turn nofirte turn posiff.mum propha- nx fummum evetlus faftigiutn, faith Photius. He moftly lived in Rome, as the place of his abode ^ where, both in life, fpeech, and habit, he pnfcjfed himfelf a Philofopher, faying, he found great profit by thefe Studies, yet made them fubfervient to* his Diviner ones. He was the firft Champion that appeared againft thofe Hereticks, Marcion and Vakntinian. Tertullian , an AfFrican born, he was indeed well read in Poets, Grammarians ^Hi^orks, Laws, well feenin Phyfickj and Phihfophy,oi whom Hierom teftirieth, that his works cuntlam feculi continent difciplinam. And what a great Divine he was, the world knoweth, and efpecially Cyprian, who in all his The- ological doubts, ftill faid, Da miki Magifirum, intelligent Ter~ tullianum. C lemens Alexandrinus, a Grecian, and born at Athens, a great Student ef Hiftory, Poetry and Philofophy , and excellent therein, even in all the He Athens, Sciences and Arts : and what z great *D^i»e proved he, and a learned Priefi alfo, who ha- ving been an Auditor to Pantmus , fupplying the pi ce in the City of Alexandria, (next after the Apoitle) and he dying, was cho'en Mafterrf the Catechifts , in which place, he maintained mightily the myfterics of the Religion. LIU Oriien $A Unlvtrftty Learning approved from the Origen , a Grecian , born at Alexandria, and Scholar or Auditor of Clemens Alexandrinus , where he ftudied and lear. ned Logic^ Arithmetic!^, Rhetoric^, Biftory, Poetry T.Cofmo- grafhy i and was experienced in all Arts and Sciences: Where. alfo in that City and Vniverjitj too of Alexandria, as fome make it, he taught a School, and profefled the fame Arts^ Soon after he read the grounds of Religion^ and foundly. inftru- &ed the Chriftiani , and ftrengehened themagainft the ftorms? of perfecution ., fo that Demetrius, the Biihop of Alexan- dria , thought him aft infirummt to be placed in the Church, and fo called h/m to be Catechifta, or Reader of Divinity in that City, in the place and ro©m of Clemens Alexandrinus dc- ceafed. They, the Difciples of Chrift were from thefe two lalfc named, Origen ami Clemens, firft called Catechumenifts, being about the year, 226. Laltantim Firmianus, of whofe Country I read nothing, a Romane, or Italian (monVlikely^HewastheScholler andDlf* ciple of Arnobitts, and publiquely taught Rhetoric \. in N borne- dia, quaft auidamfiuviris eloquenti* TullianA ; and in his old age was called to Court , to teach and Tutor Chrifpus the Son of ConftantineyXhs, Latinc tongue. This made him. the better able to-) fet forth his skill in the diviner myfteries, fo that by the help o£ his humane learning , he wrote the more wrongly againft the Gentiles and Heathens, in defence of the Chriftians. Hierwymiu, an Italian, born at Hifteria, was brought up at Rome, the beft Academy for learning then,(though there were Schools for learning alfo elfewhere in France, Af> h^Spain a* I have hinted.)His Mailer for Grammar ,there wasDw/r/w,(who is thought to be the fame who hath madc-fuch learned Cornen- tarics,on Terence and Virgil) and for Rhetoric^ ViHorinus. He read Porphyrius Ifagoge , or Introduction to Logick^, and the Philofophy of Plato and the Stoicks. He looked intoCofmo* graphy Hiftory and Antiquities , intending to ihidy Divinity, and to fet it forth with all the luftrc that might,being now fum- ciently furniflied with the Arts^He was alfo excellently learned in the Hebrew, andChaldee, and Syriack^ and ordained a Priefi ztAntioch by P aulinus ,iha Byfhop there, and was a great plan- ter of the truth,a rooter out of herelies, & in fecularibus vaidc. eruditus & inVivinis Script -urif erttditijpmus. frattice of the Ancient Fathers^ Sec. $* I have forborn to fet down the Names and Books of the Au- ehors,who report thus of thefe learned Bifhops and Divines,for that they are fo many , and well known, and for that the fame Hiftoriographers do fpeak of every one of thefe, which to write out , would be too oft to repeat the fame^ as Socrates, Socmen , Phot has , Hyeronimus , Paulinas, Tritbemius, Six t us Sencnfis, Baronius, and others who have fet forth the lives and ftudies, the arts and fciemes of thefe worthies in the Churches of God. And now, Sir,have I not (hewed you the good old 'way here al- fo , wherein the Ancient learned Fathers and Paftors and Do- lours of the Church of old walked profperoufly in their mini- fiery y and which fefus Chrifi laid out of old for them to walk, as who orde>eththe fteps and wayes of thefe Right eons go»d men andbisMinifters, Pfalm$7.2i ? Yea, I have compajfed you About with a cloud of witneffes, Heb. 1 2. 1 . and thofe not obfeure, Tenebrios, but of the illuftrious lights and luminaries of the world, who were tirft Humanely^ then after Divinely learned^ brought up at Vniverfitiss and other Schools, in the knowledge of the Arts and Languages , before they went forth, or were called into the Church and Pulpits for the preaching of the WerdzndGofpel. Into which cloud, if you will enter and corae under it, (as you cannot avoid it) and will be ( to ufe the Apoftles phrafe) iipt or baptized into me, iCor.io. 2. or rather unto the Wor- thies I have mentioned in the cloud •, it will be alfo unto you, as that cloud was, a Pillar of fire and light , to let you fee if you be not wilfully blind, that education of men at ehools and Univerfities, in the knowledge of the Arts and Sciences, as al- fo Tongues and Languages, is fo far from being away Jhut up by Chrifi asmlmpertinency, or Impediment to his Miniftcry, that it hath been (and is ftili) away laid open by him, even in the times of hisbeft and purelt Miniftery, as a great furthe- rance and promotion thereof-, and that his Humane learning which you fo vilific , is inftrumental and fubfervient (fo it ought to be as Bagar to Sarah) to the better propagation and profectionof the Divine truth. But Sir, what is the reafon you and yours are fo much out of charity with Scholars- arid Univerfity Learning? Sure it rs be- L 1 1 1 2 cauie 3^ Unto er fity Learning approved from the caufe you are too much in love with your fel ves and the Coun- trey ignorance, and like not thofe who are not like you inig* norance, or whom you cannot be like unto in knowledge. Like as it is faid, that H/>™» wrote fomewhat againft Bifliops, and theEpifcopal order, becaufe he could, not be. made aJBifhop himielf? And yet I have heard, and partly know it , that you had natural wit enough to have been a Scholar, (though God ne- ver gave you the gracious will thereto,) and I have heard you difcourJfe a great deal more rationally then now youdo, which makes me think you were dipt in Come Jhal/ow fW, and not o* ver head and ears^otherwife you would not, after /uch declaim- ing & writing againft the learning of Latinefave within a line or two fpoken and written Latins, your fdf, as you fililly do in thofe words of my taking a Living from t\\cmy te the value cf icol. per annum •, yea,andhave!fpokenfalfeEng.li*b too (like a badJEnglifh Scholar alfo) ford never took a Living from them the people, neitherfromthemas t he : owners, nor from- them as the Doners , andfo no way from them-. ] hope that hereafter you will iove Latine the better, now your felf begin tofpeakit. But] have done with that which eoncernetfr my felf folely in your Letter 3 for as to thofe other Queries or Interrogato- v lies*, Did ever ^efns lay dcren (my fprinkjing of water in Bap* tifm upm the childs face, it is anlwered. as being the fubjed of this my lafl piecewitten to youj my being Maftgr and Lord ever Gcds Heritage, my taking aTarijij Church; xny -giving the Lords Sstpptr to no better then drgs. Thefe have been anfwercd, as being a part of 5the Subject -of-, that my former piece written so. your brother. Thus, When the f-ews-had mjtrried wives, :f A(hdvd, their chilarwi [pake half in rhefpeech of Afhdod, and cculd net ffeak± in the fens Language, Neh. 13.23, 24. (0 you having made a Reparation and divorce from vour Mother Cf'ufcl; of Jerufalem* and cntred into a Communion and match with,^ fct{o£eos Santa- 1 U, this your. Letter^as your cbiide and offspring-, fpeaks whol- ly,! may lay, and not half the fpeech of the Separation, 0$ Jifidod -^ for in all thefe particulars wh ch you have mentio- •■ rgd j yp-,1 plowed with your Stmjsns Heifer, and there isnoi more . Praftice fifth Antknt Fathers ,&c . &j more difference betwixt that he firft vented , and you now have added, then betwixt Ephraim his Shibboleth, and Gilead. his Shibboleth. You tell me of fome no better then-dogs that I give the Sacra*. ment to, a*d of your- [elf having been notfo qo$d as a dog, yet I fee you are good at gathering up the [craps , and eating the crumbs •which fall from your Mafters Table \your Mafler Brothers Ta- ble, to whom you have committed your foul, and in whom you have put your truft for your fou/r fas I have heard you fhould fay to him) andfo like a Parrat, or Pie, as I faid, you fpeak no other but the. yjtji'sor Language of your Matter and Teacher brother, Inanfwering therefore him firft, I have anfwered you alfo,. who are but his fecond, nay but the very firft again • now alfo I will anfwer my own queftion beforey of Qui* expedivit Pfit- taco fuum >«a6C' namely ^Magifier artis ingeniidfj largitor tien- •■■ tera When he began, to be-in want, he went and joined kimfelf U> on* of the Citizens or Farmers in that Countrey , vc\i\eov ne '/ja.js iH&j&t (as now, fo then, Citizens had their Farms in the.! Country, and were Earners alfo as well as Citizens) and fo he -filled bis h fy with tLevery fame Huskj^he Swains or S wines do .eat, Luke 15*1 5, And fo I come to that inyour Letter which you fpeak firft,, Of my Parif;io?:crs to be n. better then dogs-pcA fecondiy, of your [elf 10 ha.ve-.been one, net fo good as a dog, till the gr„-e the Word if Truth but wrcifc " the Letter to pro v-e your own Errors :, n>yc do -\ou own the Church, buthaveforiakenit, which is the PtMar.pf Trrth. and ' . betaken your felfto, a Synagogueof your own -7 arid not onely this National Church of England^ but tueUniverfai < Lurch in the world, as who have -withdrawn yovrfelf troni die pubHck Miniftery.of the Truth in the Word and acraments. Yea, aid have renounced one of its true Sacrament^ yc. r- Jnfantrbap- tifsn-i (thele things have been dearly and largely fee forth aU ready in -my aukyexco your Brother, and i muitnotxvre ir.-; *" Ilea. g6 Grace Enlightneth before it CenvcrUth. Reader, or trifle away paper with neediefs repetitions. And therefore though I yeeld you, that the grace of God hoik appeared, plucking yott out of your wicked wayes, (which I am glad to fee, as it appeareth ) yet I cannot fay, as y ou follow on,that it hath pluckt you, to, or into the knowledge of the Truth ^ for I rind you not there, but rather (which both your Letter and life make to appear) in the ignorance^ and that wilful ignorance of the Truth, whkh makes me doubt fbmewhat of the truth alfi of thegrace of Gcd^youfoboaftofi for where true grace ap- peared, it not onely fantlifeth and piucketh out of wicked wayes, but it i//»;»»/Mftf£, and fetteth in the knowledge and path of Truth. Yea.-andufually the grace of God doth firft enlighten the foul, andteacheth it the knowledge of -the Truth, before it pluck h m from his wicked wayes , as in the Prodigal, and Satti more apparently. There Jhined round about him a light from heaven, and a voice thereout taught him the knowledge of the Truth, even Jefus, whom he perfecuted in ignorance, and fo there fell from his eyes immediately , as it had been fc 'ales , and he received forthwith hisftght , and fo after arofe, and was baptized f Ads 9.-, t 8. and became a new creature and was plucked out of his evil and wicked way, of perfecuting Chrift in his members, and became a member of Chrift himlelf •, but whether it be * the fandifying grace of God, or but the reftraining grace of God, the Evangelical tidings, or legal terrors, the faith Saint fames fpeaksof, fames 3. 17, 22. or the fear Jamaica put yon in% I rcjoyee to fee you pluckt out of your wicked wayes, and (hall much more exceedingly be gladded when 1 (hall fee you alfo brought to the knowledge of the Truth, zTim.z.7.%. andbecaufel cannot/?* merifnefs inftrutt you, oppoiing your felf,-for withal you abfenf your felf , yet I will pray that Cod would give you repen ance to the acknowledging cf the Truth. Yea, mifeovcr, at for me, God forbid that ifbouldfin again/} the Li.rd9 inceaftng to pray for you , but I will teach you the good and tht r'ghtwfiy, t Sam 12 23. Yea, I have done it, and if you re- fufe to hear it and walk therein, but rcjed it, it being the Word of the lord. Take heed left he r^jed you as he did Saul, for refilling to do after the Word of God by Samuel; and fo Sd- m;.eLr?evt-To Ennra^ayd'Saklwcntvp tuhii hu]e to Gifrcab. x Aid 4^0/ f 4#/fl£ *#« [elf or others Dogs. g7 >f nd Samuel came no mort to fee Saul* until the day of his death (like *s Saul came no more to fee ^w/w/untotheday of his* death,) neverthelefs Samuel mourned for Saul, I Sam. 15. 34. §• I. I had done, but my zeal to you, and your knowledge of the Truth, wherein I may be (ordefire to be) helpful unto you, doth carry me on a little further v asfirft, to let you know, that though David called his PerfecutorsDo^, pf> 22. 17, 21. and Peter called Apoftates Dogs , 2 Pet.2.22. and iW called Im- poftors Dogs, Phil. 3 . 6. yet will it not become you, neither is it confonant to the knowledge of the Truth, or the Truth of your knowledge, to call a whole Parijb, a company, many ofthem^ if net themojt of themr.m better then Dogs. . Like enough then they will be barking and bawling at you, if not biting and tear- ing of you •, but I will keep: them off as much as I can, and bid' them peace and be ftill, faying to them as Feterjfye be reproach- ed for the tiame of Ch- ijb, happy are ye, for the Spirit tf Glory and G od reft ethm you, 1 Pet.4.14. whilft I (hall fay; to you, Sir, you know notf another part of your ignorance of the Truth)what manner fpirit they are of , who for any thing you know, may be true (heepof Chrift :• nay, you know not what manner fpirit your (elf is of. fure the fpjrit-of Grace which is given to the meekjmd humble, refteth not upon you, for the Grace of God you faid even now,appeared, plucking you out of your wicked way es and w^rks-, had it been the fanclifying Grace, it would alio have appeared, plucking you out of- your wicked words,, and uncharitable, and untrue calumniations. Sir, till you be endued with fuch manner of fpirit, us David, Peter, and; Paul were, fo Prophetical, and Apoftclical, fo difcerning, fo au- thorized, forbear I pray fuch ra(h fpeechy. and judge not 7 that you be not judged with the fame judgement ; for. .with what meafure you meety it Jhall be meafured to you again, Mat. 7. 1 , 2. They will be (as too likely ) dogged,znd dogging aMb of you and your company, and then what coupling , and kenneling of Chrilfti- ans will there be • you will fo make the. whole ifland, the Jfle of- Dogs, otherwife famous for fteep. If this will not do, take knowledge of another Truth%(feeing the Grace of God hath appeared,plutki»g you to the knowledge of the Truth) that whofoeyer jhall fay unto his Mother, Racha, faM $g of Pride in and under flew ofHumUtj. hein danger of the-Counfel-, but tvhofoever Jhatt fay ,Thou fool, {hall be in danger of Rett fire : and what (hall he be in danger of,that faith, Thou Dog-ynayy all of you are no better then Dogs, I pray tell you me that, out of the knowledge of the Truth, that the Grace of God appearing, hath plucktyou unto. §r2. To let yon know, that-though David Med himfelf a dead dog and a flea, 1 Sam. 24.14. and Mephibojheth alfo called him- felf a dead Dog, 2 Sam. 9.6. and both out of a true humbled fpirit,m and under Glcry ♦, yet there may be a vain glory in your humility, and if fo, then wili it not become you,neither is it con- sonant to the knowledge of the Truth, or to the Truth of your knowledge, to fpeak of your felf , as one not fo good as tdog^fo Ccl.z.iS. TheApoitledifcoversa guile, or a beguiling in the voluntary humility of fome, who were voluntaries in humility . and lb Col. 2. 23 , &c. St. PauleCples a vain fhew of wifdorfle , even in the humility of the Impoflors of his time, and in their' not fparing, but neglecting their bodies,for they would fcourge their bodies, macerate their flefh with faftings^ and drinking onely w ater, to make a fhew of wifdom, and to get a repute of Religious humility, and favouring heavenly things. This was but Frier- like, with the Flagellantsjand is but Quaker-like, with Parnellites-, and may be Dipper like, with your felf ^ to make a fhew of wifdome, in this your will worfhip and humilty.to the beguiling of filly fouls, that you are ready to go through fire and water, neglecting the body : fo alfo that you mind not worldly repute, nele&ing your name, or not fparing your felf m it, but calling your felf not fogcodas a Dog in your former condition-, you might advance your new bufmefs, and your felf therein, to be as good as a tion or a Lamb. 1 think it was faid either of Diogenes by another, or by Die- genes of another, going but barely and thinly in cloathes that a man might fe e Pride as well in a Philofophers thread-bare i[o*it, as an Emperors rich furr'd Pall: fo that Ecefalius, who laid himfelf flat on the ground, in the Temple Porch;;Bidding people to go over him, and tread upon him as unfavoury fait, (Calcate me infipidumfakm) made therein but a fliew of wif- dom , a- policy rather, and favoured even of pride, in that his s.ffctted, and therefore ju ly fufpecled humility: and I think Abi- of Pride in and under fhew ofHumilty . ~~$^ Abigail did but Complement , to thofe words of her, being fent for to be wife to David, Let thine hand-maid be a fervant to wa/h the feet of the fervant s of my Lord, I Sam. 25. 42. But enough of this, and take it, I pray, not as my fuppofiti- on in you, that it is fo, but rather my admonition to you, that it be not fo, For I muft now tell you , my opinion is, it was not fo with you then, nor fo with thofe others, either then or now, of whom you fpeak the fame. §.3. You may be bold with your felf, you will fay, and I fay fo too, bolder with your felr in calling or mifcallmg what you pleafe, then you may be with others upon that ground,that no wan knoweth the things of a man fave the f fir it of a man which u in him, I Cor 2. r 1 . and a mans own heart will tell him more of him felf, then feven Watch-men that fit in a high Tower * yet / fay, as through the Grace of (jod given to me, to every man that ts among you, (and you efpecially) not to tkink^or fpeai^ of him- f -If more highly then he ou,ght to thinks, or fpeak, Rom, 1 2. 3 . (as to think or fpeak of himklf as an Angel, or Lion (as I faidj gi- ifiitg out that him felf was, or is, fame great oney or the great p'-tverof God, Acts 8. 9, 10. fonot to think, or fpeak of him- felf more lowly then he ought to think or fpeak (as to think or fpeak of bimfelf ) as a worm , or a dog, (as you fay, J unlcfs you be of the fame fplrit affuredly that they were, who extraordi- narily thought and fpake fo of themfelves : For the Apoftle faichof the firft, they do not think or fpeak foberly of them- felves , or \mto fobriety-^ and I may of the/* og^ Chrijlians are not. you write) to the -knowledge of the Truthy is the fame Grace, which brought St. Peter to the knowledge of the Truth in this matter • and appeared to him, Alls 10. 15. & 28. God hath fhewed me ,ti\lh Peter, that I Jbould not call any man common or tine U an : and befidmher*//^, there was a voice fpake to him alio, What God hath clean (fed ', that call not thou common y and fo the fame voice forbids you \ ft hough you fee not the vifion) hear it, and call not any man hereafter, call not your felf dogt . or any other^ common or unclean, creature or name. Indeed before the Eleftion and calling of the Gentiles was made kno wit to the A poftles by our Saviour Chrift, the Apo- ftle< and others had fome fuch thoughts and fpeeches of the Gentiles, as dogsy and as unclean, as appears by Peter here at firft, and Apoftles and Brethren that were in fudea, who con- tended with Peter for going unto them, and eating with them ; Alls 1 1. 3. Yea, and Chrift himfelf told the woman of Ca- naan, a Gentile ; It was not meet to take the childrens bread \ and to caft it to dogs, when flic fupplicated him for to caft a Devil out of her daughter, Mat. 15. 26. Bogs, becaufe they were out of a vifible admiffion and reception into the Church- vifible, for without are dogsyRev '.22. 1 5. but even (he (as they, other Gentiles) when fhe (hewed the faith (he had in the mercy of God, and made profeflion of her Matter, Chrift, in that repl y (Truth Lordy)et the dogs do eat of the crumbs that fall from their Makers Table.) Afutavit vocabulumy quia mutatum vidit af- fectum, faith Auguftine upon the place, he changeth his word and appellation, becaufe hefaw in her a change of ftate and con- dition ; now he faith, O womanygreat is thy Faith ; no longer nowadog, but a woman, yea and ufeth her, not like a dogy but as one of the loft Sheep of Canaan, or the Gentiles. But for your felf, and thofe other of my Pari(h,who are born Christians, of Chriftian Parents, and fo within and under the Covenant of Grace, andalfo put under the Initial feal of the Covenant of Baptifm. (I my felf baptized you, thirty fix years fithence,) and thriving under my Miniftery of the Word, (your feif have often heard me preaching ,anfwcred me,and well to my queftions of Catechizing yyour Af other Eunice al[o bring- ing yon up like a Timothy, m the nurtriture and knowledge of the Script ares, from ,i very chide) and growing up in Faith, by my ad- The Children of Ifrael were not. None of the Elett are Dogs. 91 adminiftration of the Lords Supper. ( Jf I remember well; I have alfo taken examination of you, as of the young men, and found you, or made you fitting and capable of the fame, and exhibited the fame unto you) And what ! were all my people, the moft of them, no better then dogs , and your felf not fo good as a dog, all this while, and no Grace of God appearing, and plucky ingyou to the knowledge of the Truth f A Chrifiian dog is a word for a f ew, or a Turk, to fpeak •, to look upon Chrifiians as dogs, andtoufeChriftianslike dogs, is an aft for a Barbarian and Scythian to do. §. Nay Sir, you not onely wrong your felf a Chriftian, and my Chriftian Pariftiioners , but you injury Chrift himfelf and the Grace cf Chrift, appearing both in them, and your felf, to the plucking of your felf and them, from their wicked wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth, (I can be a better witnefs for them, then you, who are but herein, theaccufcr of the Brethren) for the Seal of my Mini fiery are they, many of them,*'» the Lord, I can truly fay with the Apoitlc, i CV.9. 2. I lay again, you wrong Chrift himfelf, an*l the Grace of Chrift, and the Cove- nant of his Grace, and the Seals of his Covenant, Baptifm,and the Lords Supper, and the fruits and cffc&s of his Seals, and the Spirit of God that daily wrought and brought forth fuch fruits and effefts in their lives. And laftly, you wrong your own eyes and ccnfcience, that will not fee and acknowledge this, by your ftiling your felf not fo good, and my people no better then dogs, till you and they came out of your, and their wick- ed wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth. What fay you then to die children of Ifrael, and their chil- dren ? by your fpeech and reafon, they muft go for dogs too, as not yet plucked out of their evil wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth > but in the fhrafe , and language of Scripture, they vmxtzholy people , and their children not unclean, but holy ; The Root holy, and the Branches likewife, Rom. 11.16. and that by reafon of the Covenant of the holy God, and the Seals up- on them, with the other Ordinances . and even Saul in the Ads of the Apoftles, was no dog, but a chofen veflel of Chrifl-, before the Grace of G6d appeared, plucking him out of his wicked way, to the knowledge of the Truth. Yea, thus you wrong all the Eleft of God, for Gods Eleft, as Saul and your Mm mm 2 felf p j Of the Grace of God. felf (it may. be) may live in wicked wayes . and be ignorant of the Truth t a long while, as Saul did, (and you fay of your felf that you did) yea, the Bldb Ephefians, arefaid to be children of wrath by nature, as well as others, Eph.z . 3 . and Eph. 1.4. and yec were not, nor could be called dogs, notvvithitandirig impure or hateful before God, b caufe they were in and under the Uve of God, which is called Am or Benevcle ntU^ the love of his eter- nal good Will and Benevolency in electing of them, although before their Converfion, and before they have Faith, they do not ftand a&ually reconciled unto God, which is called Amcr Ccmplacr/itU^ the love of his fpecial delight and complacency, inaccepting of them, by the coming of Chrift into the world, and purchasing it for them : fo that their per fins are never hate- ful or deteiUble, but beloved and accepted from all eternity, and therefore cannot be as bad as dogs^ though their fiate wherein they are in, may be odious and deteftable,as was Sauls when he perfecuted the Church, and as was yours when you walked in wicked wayes, and both of you were ignorant of the Truth ; but this fome ftmilar .aUtiic \qualitj 0/ a dog, as im- purity and ignorance for a while, is riot enough ©r fufficient to impute the Title and denomination of a dog to fuch,. whofs perfons belong to Gods Election, and are under gracious fa, vour of God in Chrift, and are parties covenanted with, and partakers of the Seal or Seals : 'Doth God take care for Ox en ? 1 Cor. 9.9. -what Dogsywho are Gsds ? what a tranfpofition of letters is this? what an Anagram ? which none but an Ingram and Agrammaticalmzn, who is himfelf tranfported with a zeal without knowledge, can or will affirm or make. The. field that is intended for Wheat , fallowed for Wheat, and Sown with Wheat, is not called, or to be called, a barren W^ildernefs, and defart Land, though weeds come up in it everywhere, and be-* fore the good husbandry hath appeared, plucking them up, but it is called Tilth-land, and a Wheat-field. The groundof your error lyeth in this, that you thought of no other Grace, but, that of fanttificaticn t when you fpake thofe words, of your fclf and others, to be dogs, until the Grace of God appearing, plucking you out of your wicied wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth, fo the words therafel ves do (hew, and therby (hew alfo your ignorance of the Grace of God,both that €onverfwn b) cm-Mini fiery, and net another ^nd the time when. 9% that of Election, and that of Juftification*, which is not any inherent Righteoufnefs and quality, 'as Papiftsalfo hold with you, which in matter of Juftitication or Election, is but dung, as the ApoiHe calleth it i for the Grace of God is one of his Attributes,, out of us, in God , and according to the ufe of Scri- pture, is either metonymkally, thefpecial gift of Grace , or fnpsr/j, the gracious favour of God in Chrift, by which Grace, we are elected, called, juftiried, fanctified, and (hall be glori- fied j and in this order they go one before another, as feveral acts and degrees of Grace, /anttification being the end or effed, as of our Election, Eph. 1.4. and of our fuftif cation, Luke 1^.75. to oiowr Vocation, iThef.^j. Its a ftrange error of yours, to account your felf and others a (beep onely in and un- der the Grace of fan&ification < fo you fay, you were no better then a dog, till the Grace of God plucked you out of your e-r- vil wayes j were you then a dog and no Jheep in and under the Grace of Eledion, and Vocation, and Juftification ? I am fure others are not. But what is your drift and fcope I pray Sir, in writing thus to me now at this time, that your felf hath not been fo good as a dog, till the Grace of God appeared, pluck- ing you out of your wicked way, unto the knowledge of the Truth. Is it to advance the power and efficacy of your feparate and dipping Minift ery, above mine and the Sacerdotal function? it muft be fo , and no marvel $ for you committed foul and body unto but one of them •, my felf and others could feldom get your body unto our Churches and Miniftery-, I prepared my dinner , find killed my Oxen and fat lings, and had all things in a readinefs, Mat: 22. 4. but you made light of it, and went an- other way, or would ftay at home", or when you came, if the good feed I fowed in you,did not fall into good ground'; Af*?f . 13. 4: to bring forth fruit •, but.you fuffered the fowls, the wicked one, to devour and catch it away, or the thorns of th.eca.res of this world, to fpring up and choak it, you muft blame neither Seed nor Sewe~, neither Miniftery nor Minifter, but even fay of your felf , I was a High-way fide Hearer, a Thorny-ground An* ditor , like as you fay you was no better then a dog that while, and fo I gave that srhichwar holy to d'gs. But I donot.fov fo, that, you were -that while any frch. ibr. 24 Converfton from the fret Grace of God for you did neither trample the holy things under your feet {though they fell upon thorns , or by the way fide) neither did you turn again and rend me. Again, Let no one of you be puffed for one a- gainft another, i Cor. 4. 6. I acknowledge there is a difference -of Miniftery j but who make th thee to differ f rem another ? whs u Paul, and who ii Apollos, but the Minifters by whom you belie- ved ? for neither is Paul that plant eth, nor Af olios that water eth any things but God that giveth the increafe, 1 Cor.3. 5,7. you do well and wifely to fay, The Grace of God appear ing, plucks you -out^ and fo to afcribe the glory of your plucking out of wicked wayes to the Grace of God ; The Grace of God is free, as ■the Spirit of G*d> to blow where it lift eth, John 3.8. and upon whom,/o by whom, and when it Jifteth. Yet thirdly, I add, that According to the Grace of God which ii given tome, I have laid the foundation , 1 Cor. 3.10. of your •coming out of your wicked way to the knowledge of the Truth, for many years together, and another doth but build thereon ; and vthe foundation I have laid in you, was none other then fefxs Chriftsna~ him crucified. The Covenant of the Grace of God in Chnft ,(7 will be thy %od,and the God of thy feed,) made therefore with your believing Parcnts,and your /elf, with the Seals therof, which have been given you, and the conditions, which arc to be performed by you • yea, I have built upon this foundations/^, Silver, and precious ftones, preach in Faith, and Repentancc,and Obedience, fin your own words, Jeoming out of wicked wayes, Ainto the knowledge and pracTiceof the Truth : and juft then, when the building fhould have been raifed up ; unto a perfect man, unto the meafure of the ftature of the fulnefs of Chrift, you fell a pulling down, as fait as I iiftd built up •, yea, you fufler,. -ed others to come in upon you by their Heights and cunning craftinefs, whereby they lie in wait to deceive, to build upon my fowd2ition,Wood,Hay,zndStubble,ind fuch combuftible things, and tofct in many of their weak^, ar.d impotent, and beggerly rudiments upon it,efpecially thofe three \ your feparaticnttom your Church, your evil affection to the ordained Miniftery, your new Dipping and Re-baptizing, with a renouncing of your old. If \ ou, or any of you, fhall qucftion farther, why tie Grace of God by my Miniftery, did not pluck you out before, and fooner, divers years ago, before this h^ fatal one, out of your wicked working wktn it flmftth, ^ wicked wayes, &c. it isanfwcred, Becaufe there was the Grace of God in it, which is free to work,(as I faid) and as where, and by whom, fo when it pleafeth • for Paul plants cnely, and Af ol- ios onely watereth , but God giveth the increafe -, fonie increafe I have (hewed you , God gave, but the full increafe, which is the Harveft, doth not preferftfy come up after fowing : For/o m the Kingdom of God, as if a man fhould caft feed into the ground \ and t Ik feed fhould firing and grove up, he knoweth not how, (faith St. Markf) F*r the Earth bringeth forth the fruit cf her felf, firfl the blade, then the ear, after that the full cent in the ear, Mark 4. 26,27,28. Converfion in feme, cometh as \ lightning from Heaven, and is done fuddenly , in a moment^ at once •, fo to Saul and Zacheus-, but to others, as the feed before mentioned,, it comes upflowlj, and by degrees, in time, as to Nicodemus and the Prodigal , and this is your cafe. Now, it is not the Iqft firoak^ with tjie Axe. that muft baer the name of cutting down the great Oak. from the ftump and root, but all the blows, from the firft to the laft -, nor is it the fowing of the laft handful of feedy muft go away with the tit te of bringing forth the whole Crop, Hofea6.$. Mat.^.io. God hath been hewing you thefe many years, by the Axe of my Miniftery , which hath been fharpened at times, in reproofs and admonitions to you, both in the matter fitted for you, and in my thoughts fixed up- on you in the publick> and fo laid to the Rotts of the Trees, to your evil wayes, faying, Bring-forth fruits worthy, or meet for Repentance, elfe you muft be hewen down and cajl into the fire. So for the fame purpofe, God and his Grace, by my Miniftery, hath been/f eding you with the good and principal Wheat, the pure and precious Word of God /or thefe many years; and now (hall the men of yeflerdaj, your new Seeds-men and Heads- men, your laft Teachers and Dippers, who have wrought but one hour, be made ecjualtome1M.2X.20.12. yea, be preferred before me, who have born the burthen and heat of the day ; if God will have it fo, let it befo : It is lawful for him to do whatfoever he will with his own ; and mine eye flail not be evil, becaufe God is good. Herein alfo is and will be that faying true, One foweth, another reapeth, John 4. 37,, 3 8. They in the mean time reap that, they beftowed no labour upon : I laboured with yon, and they en- tered into my labours^and have gotten you out of my hands, " thoogfi $6 Converfttn not from the Anabaptifls Miniflery. though to no good praife and ccmmendation for thcmfelves, and it may (o fall out, they may finde no great Crop or purchafe of you, and neither may repay their craft more then their charge- efpecially if you will do as you ought , Return and own thefirji Grace of God appearing to you, and plucking you out from your wicked wayes to the knowledge of the Truth. Butfourthly, Is this all, Sir, that your new Teachers and Converters have done for you, and is this a]J the Grace that hath appeared to you, for to pluck you out of your wicked wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth? Nay, they have not done all this, for they have not brought you to the knowledge of the Truth, but of their Errors : they have pulled you from knowledge to ignorance, and from the truth to faKities, and lyes, as the Scripture phrafeth fuch, and I will tell you prefent- ly the particulars ^ but fuppofe it awhile, they have pluckt you to the knowledge cf the Truth, that's enough to-prove you a true Convert by them, for fudas was pulled up fo far a? to the knowledge of the Truth, yet proved an Apcftate at laft Tor all that, and was an Hypocrite in the mean time'- if you be not plucked up farther yet, namely, to the love of the Truth, God may fend you (as in pr-efent he doth,) firong dcluficns, that you {"hall h licve a lye and be damned, 2 Thefs. 2.1 1, 12. Yea, and yet farther, to the obedience and practice of the Truth, elfe youmaymifsto be blefTedin the end: for, If ye know thefe tUngs, blejfedareye if ye do them, John 13-47. Many fhall fay i.rJo me (faith Chrift) in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prc- pbefeJ in tly Name ? yeayand in thy Name -cafl out devils ? to irk m he will prof efs, even to fuch profeflbrs, J never knnv you ; depart from mc.ye rrcrkers of iniquities, Mat. 7. 22, 23 . Oh, but you arc alio plucked out of your wicked wayes too, and the Grace of God hath appeared in that alfo. Cut neither is that fufficientio (hew your Con veriion by them, for, Ahab hum- lied li^felf^andivrnt (oft I), and abfiaincd Jelling himfelf unto !::: a while, at the rebukes of Ettas, 1 King. 21. 29. and Hercd reformed fomevvhat, and did many things at the preaching cf JJw.and heard him gladly, Mark 6. 20. and Efau mourned for Iv.slofs and faleof fiis birth-right, and fought the bleiling a* gain, and that carefully with tears, Heb. 12. 17. If you as-k Jpat more worfhf 1 require , uk:t lack^th fet ? I anlwcr to you as Convey fionmuft bt unto Truth and good works ^ &c. ~~Z. as our Saviour Chrift did to the young-man, Mat. 19.20. (Tor neither are you too old, if you be not too cold to learn) faying much as you do, ( All thefe things do 1 now /^e^though not from my youth up •, the Grace of God hath now in my elder years appeared, plucking me from my wicked wayes.) One thing is lacking, and if thou wilt be a perfed Convert, find the way to change your minde fas the Author to the Hebrews addeth) and not onely to alter your courfe, and turn to the Lerd with all your heart , and fo order that your foul andfpirit may be wafhed from evil lufts, and not onely the body and cloathes dipt from wicked works. . But you add, The day will difcover, and God will judge between us andyou, whether you own the Truth, to which and whom therefore I leave you. §. I proceed to a fit thing, which is this, That whatfoever good thing is wrought in you (' ferioufly and unfeignedly,I con- congratulate it, whatfoever it be, and would be inftrumental unto the growth and increafe thereof, in the way of the Word of Truth :) let the Grace of God that hath appeared to you> have the glory of it, not unto them -, not unto them, your (new Land Teachers) and new Pond Dippers, but unto the name and Grace of God, give the glory, of whatfoever Conversion is wrought in you. If you do not, then with *David I will fay, Net unto us 0 Lord, not unto us, but unto thy Name give glory, for thy Mercy and Truths fake, Pfal. 1 1 5 . 1 . They have pluckt you onely from the good old Way, into a new, by, and bad path : from the publick Miniftery or Steeple-houfesXoe it fo) to private myfieries or fmokeries , rather of their Chimney-houfes, from your frfl true Baptifm at a Font\ to a fecond vain Dippifm in a Pond, They have been rather inftrumental to your Confufion then your Converfion. Yea, I fay further, God doth not ufe them, the Anabaptifts , as Anabaptifts, and their do&rineas any ordinary means or instruments of his , to the Converting fouls to the Faith and Truth. I promifed to give you a Particular of them, and their Do- ctrines, and this it is,wherein they differ from us, and have for- faken the Truth of our Church, and the Word of God, and which doth denominate and conftitute an Anabaptift. They reject all Infant-bflptifm, renouncing their own Baptifm N n n n fan p8 Errors of the Andaptifls. they took^ in Infancy , And therefore Re-baptize thmfe Ives and ethers, and keep their children from BAptifm , till years ofdifcre- tion , And ability of profeffwn, andfo in a manner deny the Seal of the Covenant of Grace to Infants ; with whom alfo God hath entred into it, faying, I will be thy God, and the God of thy feed. They hold all Jlinted, and fet forms of prayer, unlawful to be ufed in Chrucb or Houfe, and even fo alfo, the Lords prayer. That there is no dtftintlion betwixt Clergy and Laity. That the taking of Oaths before, or by the Authority of a Ma- gifiratc, is unlawful. That the ojfee of a Magijlrate is neither lawful nor neceffary : with abundance more (for why flaould I ftir the whole dunghil to infect the Air ) of coherent and coincident Errors and Lyes, as the Prophetical Scriptures call them. Are fuch Teachers and Tenets, like to pluck you out of your wicked wayes, and to bring you to the knowledge of the Truth, whether private or publick, who hang fo fail in the Bujhes and Thickets of Errors , and if ick fo deep in the mire of Vices, dipt in both up to the chin and mouth, yea, over head and ears, cfpecially, feeing fuch were never called or fent about the work of Converting fouls to either. For my part, I am of Paul, and I am of ferimiah, and fo ftiould you be of both too, the Apoftle and the Prophet. But firft, I am of Paul the Apoftle, who faith, indeed Faith cometh by hearing, fan how /hall they believe in whom they have not heard? But it is nearing of a Preacher . for how /hall they hear without a Preacher ? And it is of a Preacher/?»r, for how /hall they preach except they befent ? The Apoftle isclearof theopinion, that inely fent Preachers , who have Mi (ft on tnd Commijjion from God, can bring hearers to the Faith, and feems to wonder at thofe in his vehement and frequent Interrogatories, who fay or think otherwife. This Text I may call Faiths Clymax , or Ladder, with its ftcps and gradations, which none of your Lay-brethren could ever yet climbe up to, or come down by; if they begin at the lower end, as they ought, being the ground and foundation of die work, and fo offer to go and climbe up , they mifst)f their hrfaftep and footing, becaufe they are not fent, and fo muft *Jimbe no farther or higher >, for want of Miffion they cannot Of Mtfon. 99 go up the Ladder in the Right way of preaching and begetting faith in the Hearers, or your felf. Andifthey begin at the up- per end , and top of this Ladder (as indeed prefumptuoufly they ufetodo, and heap to themfelves at firft a multitude of Hea- rers) andfo come down along to their preaching, yet they/*?// off the Ladder at the lower ftaffe or fief again,becaufe ftill they be not fent, and fo can do no mifiive or miniitenal good upon their Hearers, nor your felf, as to Faith. It is Gods great mercy to them and you, that they caft not themfelves down head-long, or that they are not cafi down by him that tookjhemup into the Pulpit, and fet them on that Pin- rutcfe of the Temple, to the breaking of their necks , as well as making (hipwrack of Faith, for they jtmpt the Lord their God, and are not in their waye s (which words muft not be left out by you,as they are left out by the devils citing of that Text) and therefore God hath given his Angels no charge over them, (being out of their wayesjto bear them in their armes or hands, that they dafh not their foot againft the fiones. Yea, they do dafh not onely their /m,but their tongues alfo againft the ftone, the Head-ftone of the corner, which tnefe builders refufe, in a- fcending Pulpits, or ftepping into chairs, and preaching with- out his fending or Commiflioning them, according to his Prero- gative given unto him, of which this is a part, All power is gi- ven me in Heaven and in Earth, as my Father hath fent me, fo fend I you, Mat. 28.18,19. John 20.2. So alfo I am of Jeremi- ah; who is fo frequent and fervent in the point, that I fhall one- ly name the Texts, and make the proofs out of all together, pr. 14.14.& 23.32 21. &27. 14. & 29. 8,9. wherelobferve, that ft x or f even times, the Lord by the Prophet faith, that he fent them not, and thereipon it's faid, thrice they prophefied lyes (cnce) otherwife tken the word is, fonce) deceits and dreams, (once) their Errors and Hpbtnefsyfalte virions and divinations , things of naught, and the deceits of their own hearts, (enough one would think to keep off people.from hearing of them Jtend yet in plain terms, therefore they are forbidden(r^nVf) to hear- ken to them or their words. And if for all this they will be hearing of them, fas they have now very itching ears, and give themfelves much to hearing new men, as news-men) the Prophet tells and foretels them more plainly, The 7 JbaU. do -49 gooflon it , Nnn n 2 at I oo The yirahptifis profit not as to Faith and Conversion. at the 32. verfeof the 23. Chapter, lfent thtm not, nor com. wandcdthem, Therefore they Jhall not pre jit this people at all, faith the Lord. Hear you chis Sir, and hearken to this all ye feparate people of England, thofe of Cod unftn\ uncommanded Preachers, falfe Teachers, of the Anabapttitical feparation, (for are they not fo that teach you the Dobtrines end ftktlicrj 1 have parti- cularized but even now, and now may afiimilate unto the lyes, dreams, deceits, vain virions of thole ralle Prophets) thofe falfe Teachers or the Anabaptifti alleparation : ] fay,r.ay,/*;7/7/ta Lay;, {hah » t profit you at all \ therefore they have not. nor any Grace oi God appearing in, by , or from them •, ( for God doth not give Ccnvirtin^n.inift mal Grace to them whom he doth- not/rW, nor Commiilion them,) plucked yen , or any of our people nor fhall pluck them or you from your wicked wayes to the knowledge of the Truth ^ (for this is and u ill be, a great deal or proit) they have got turned and converted you, or any of our people, nor fhail unto the Faith, and unto God, (forthisisand wilibe.thegreateft profit of all that can be./ "You fay they have converted you, (and fo fay fome others, I am fure) and done you much gad to your fou1, which you have faid you would lomrfiit to them, and trtjl them with : ;a very foolifh, alrroit blafphemous fpeech , if you faid it ) And Cod faith here, they (Vail not pr- fit you at all, and therefore do }ou nogced, either in foul aid body (as to Converfon and Salvati- on • ) whom {hall ] belie* e, God or you ? whom do you believe, God or ) our felf? Gods true prediction, or }*our own falfe fuggeftion? Come, come Sir, LttGodbc tr«-e, and every man a Iyer, Rom. 3. 4. as it is written alfo •, for fo your felf, and every other man that faith he hath profited in foul ui. to Salvation or Crzvorfien, by thefe vnftnt , and imrdained Preachers of the reparation, whtn as God faith, fuchfhali not pnfit the people at all, by their Anabaptiftical Do&rinesand Preachings. Mi- ftjke me not, I am, not againft the profit, that may come even from them to you or others, by mutual and fraternal confe- rences, exhortation?, admonitions, fuppl cation', fo long as their words be feafor.e.d with the fait of Tiuth and Grace, and he good to the ufe of edifying, and) our felves have \ our feri- fts exercifed, to difcern both good and evil, and be able to try and People are the more err emeus and vinous threugb their Do ft rims, ioi and prove all things, and hold to that which is good ; for fo God hath allowed and approved cf it, and pr^nt may come upon it, Cef. 3 . 16 I The/. $. 1 1 . But this from Gods Word 1 hold, That an ufttrped pnblick_ taking npen them the cure of fouls, without Commiffion, fas teaching Anabaptifts do in a manner, }ea, upon the matter, of the fraternity and foronty within their limits,1 and alfo their difpenlingand dividing the myiteries of the Word and Seals of the Sacraments, without a lawful fending, ordination, and/f- fan tun thereto, andthat in a rightly constituted and planted Church, where there is a power of order and degrees , a.~d a fe tied or fixed Miniftcry, will be of no profit and btnefit to yea orthepopk, astoFaith and Conversion, that wait and attend onely upon fuch a fervice or Miniitery, (if I may fo call it.) Vor now lift up \ our eyes, and look on the fields . arc they white-unto the Harveft, lince people left praying that God Would fend Hu-sbtndmen into his ^ork, and JLaborers into his Vineya'-d, andfince peoplehaveleftcomirg to, and attending Upon their own painful preaching Mirifters, and have beta- ken themfelves to the hearing of ielf-intrucing peakers which were none ofGods calling orfending}a.ve they not rathcrfmutch- ed and imitten With blafting and wilder?, with pride, hatcghti- nefi, malice, variance, rancour, envy . fraud* lency cc-vetohfnefs, lying, defamation, hypocrifes,impu iries, more then ever they were, and compared about of late, with fuch a dark^ ci.i d of Satans iritnefjes and his Emijjaries, every where tranf- forming themfelves into Anieis of Nero lfaht% . no b- tter then darknefs?-*1 Bef.des the Schilms in the Churches of God, and deftra&i- onsof mers minds, the contempts of Gods Ordinances, the broaching of Errors and Kcreiies,che Rapines, Sacriledges, and MafTacres that have been committed, the flighting of Laws and Civil MagiftrateSjtheupriring of bloody Wars, ana. throw- ing down of Order and Proprieties, Infurred.on and Rebel- lion. And -now Sir, I return to vou again, to whom 1 have a fixtli t^ing to acquaint you with, and then I fhall take my leave, and fubfcribe a friendly farewel to you. §. Sixthly, What fhall I fay more' to you of thefe men? f™ j 02 All fpiritual good from the Covenant of Crace^ for that indeed a notable change and alteration hath been wrought in you, is manifeft to all them that dwell here abouts and we cannot deny it ; my felf, (as I have faid) rejoyce at it, yea, and the Angels in Heaven rejoyce over one [inner that repent' eth and converteth truly and finccrely. This therefore I will fay, even the fame ftill that you do, That the Grace of God appeared, plucking yon out of your wicked wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth ; But I ask as St. Paul doth, Gal. 2.3 . This onely would I hear and know of yoa, Recei- ved you the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by the hearing of the Faith i, fo received you this Grace, or your Conversion of being pluck* out of your evil way es, to the knowledge of the Truth, from the Word preached by your Brethren of the fe- paration, or from the Word preached by my felf, or other or- dained Minifters ? I have proved before, that unfent Teachers and Preachers fhall not, and cannot profit you with their Do- ctrines, efpecially being not of God and his Word, and there- fore they have not wrought any fuch thing in you by their Do- ctrines, and that you could not, cannot attain, and therefore have not attained to Faith, but by hearing of a fent and or- daintd Preacher, and the Word of God by him. Again, received you this Grace of God, or your Conversion and piut king out of your evil wayes, from the Spirit of God, in and by your la ft Dippifm, or your firfi Baptifm? not in and by your laft dipping at Laver, for this requireth Ccnverfon ,and Faith, and Profeilion of it, before you can be partaker of it; you mull: bring thefe with you, already wrought to your dip- ping, your dipping doth not work them at that time, but prefup- poftth them : fo, I cannot call your dipping a Laver of Regene- tatim, but a Generation of I know not what, at Laver, or a de- g r.c ation. Befdes, 1 have fhewed this your dipping, which is Dut a Re-baptizing at the beft, to be a humane device, yea, Her recicalpraftife-, foefteemed, and for fuch condemned, of the Churches of God, throughout all Ages-, and therefore it can be no means or inflrument of God and his G race, to plucky you jrew yojtr wicked wayes, to the knowledge of the Truth, ■ W hither now Sir, will you go ? as Hof. 2. 7. fo is your cafe •, She ft:, a II fclLw after her Lovers, but fue (hall not overtake them, fojft ejUXfedjhm, Utjhall net finde th(m - den ft},:ll fa fay , / fealed in Infants Baptifm to theElefl. j 0 , 1 -will go and return to my firft Husband,for then was it better with me then now. Follow not therefore after thofe your Suitors ,and Solicitors, rather your iaveiglers and beguikrs, that rather have ten pted your fpiritual chaftity, and attempted alfb, fome- what upon your body, but come and return to your firft Hus- band, Chrift Jefus, and your firfi Covenant of Grace, fealed un- to you in yourfii ft Baptifm, from which, as from the Fountain, hath iflued out all other Grace of God appearing to you fi- thence •, and even that, pluckjngycu out fnm your wicked wayes, find bringing ycu to the know ledge of the Truth, through his dif- penfing his word, and your hearing the fame of Gods Minifters fent to that purpofe -, and through the operation of his Spirit, ftirringup the Grace of God in you, and the Grace of the fame, fan&ifying your afflictions, and laft ficknefs,and fears,and other things that have befallen you. J he did net kr.cw that her firfi Husband gave her Corn, and Wine, andOyl, and multiply ed her ft her and gold, which they prepared for Baal, Hof. 2-8. or ("as in the margent) wherewith they made Baal. And fo you do not, or did not know, that Gods firft Covenant of Grace in Chnft (/ mil be thy Sod, and the God of thy feed,) fealed unto youinyourlnfant-baptifm, your firft Infant-baptifm fealing unto you the Covenant of the Grace of God in Chrift, gave you your knowledge of the Truth, your Converiion from your evilwayes, your Repentance, your Faith, and increafed thefe and other Graces in you, which you and they prepare for, and afcribc to their and your Anabaptifm, and wherewith they and you would make Anabaptifm Reaping upon the Altar that they have made, and doufingin the Ponds that you go to, crying, o Baal hear us, or, Great is Diana of the Ephefians, the dipping of the Anabaptifts. Why halt ye, or how long^O ye people, halt ye between two opinions, or two Baptifms ? i Kings 1 8.2 1 . if your firfi Infant- baptifm, be the Seal of Gods Covenant of Grace to you, fol- low it -, but if the Anabaptifts fecond Dippifm , be the Seal, then follow it. Therefore I fay farther to them, the people and you •, not /, even lonely, but we, even we alfo, thou finds of us , re- main the Minifters of the Lord, and your Prophets-are a great many more •, (forevery one that will with you, may confecrate femfdf^arribeaProphet)we,.as we do, will (till bring our children: 104 All '[primal get d front the Covenant of Grace, children and Infants of believing Parents, unto Baptifm in our Churches, pouring on, or fprinkling water, In the name of the Father , the Son, and the holy Ghofl, with invocation or calling on the Name of the Lord •, and do you, as you ufe, go out with your grown, but born Chnftians, men and women, whom you have with-held from their Baptifm in their Infancy, or with o- ther grown perfons formerly baptized, whom you have fedu- ced into your by-wayes, and carry them to your dippings, and diving them over head and ears, body & cloathes, in your Ponds of the held ; the Baptifm or waftiing, that anjwereth by fire, I mean the Spirit, i Kings 18.24. and fp ritual Graces, bringing after to Repentance from evil wayes, and unco the knowledge of the Truth , let that be the right waftiingand Baptifm in- deed : All the people (I know) will, and your felves alfo muft needs anfwer, The word is good, and it ts well fpoken. Now then I propofe, and its my imjor proportion meft true, That waftiing with water, or Baptifm, which aniwerech by fire, (cavil not at the phrafe,God, in or by Baptifm I mean)' and hath the Graces of Gods Spirit, Faith, Repentance, Con- verfion^ anfwerableand following thereupon, is that, and that onely, which is mentioned in the Scriptures, as of Gods Infti- tution, fo conjunction, Mat. 3.11. Mark^ 1.8. Ails 2. 38. fohns-6. and in a great many other places, which formerly I have brought, lr>ewing the correfpondence or accompanying the one of, or to, and after the other, the Baptifm and the Spi- rit. But I aflfume, and it is my minor propofition, yet no lefs true, That neither of your two dippings, (I call them two, in refped of the Subjects, which are of two forts, fome formerly bapti- zed, and fome not) are to be found in any part of Scripture throughout the whole Bible, either inftituted of God, or con- joyned with fire, or the Spirit, as my whole Book, and this an- nexed Treatife, or Cenfure, hath cleared demonftrated. And therefore I may conclude Negatively, againft your dip- ing by Anabaptifts, that it anfwereth not by fire, and fo you have received from them and it, nothing but water -, no fire, no Spirit, no Grace, no Regeneration, no Conversion, no plucking. cut of jour evil wayes into the knowledge of the Truth. What you have of thefe Goods or Graces in prefent, ycu have and re- feaUd in Infants Baptifm to theElett* , 0 ? received as fparks, at your firft Baptifm in your Infancy , which being according to the Scriptures, and to Gods Ordinance and Inftitution, anfwereth by Fire in all Gods elect children,as who are inwardly alfo baptized of the Spirit, which is the fire I mean andfpeakof; which anfwering alfo by fire in them afterwards, (heweth their Baptifm in Infancy, to have been according to the Scripture, Gods Ordinance and Inftitution. To come up yet clofer to you. If you, Sir, be one of thofe that belong unto the Election and Covenant of Grace , as I in charity judged of you, as I ought to do, when I baptized you, and gave you Baptifm, as the feal of the Covenant , then were you baptized with firey i. e. the Spirit, as welt as water ; the inward Grace being united to the outward Sign unto fuch, and the Spirit a.s truly, and rea-liy, and actually applying the merits and blood of Chrift, in the ju- itifying and fanctifying vertue, unto your foul, as I did the wa- ter to your body, or bodily part of your face or forehead ^ and theinvifible Grace of the Sacrament was conveyed to you by fuch vifible means • fo that if you had dyed in your Infancy, this your Baptifm had been to you (fuppofing you ftili an Elect In- fant) as a feal of the Righteoufnefs of Chrift, extraordinarily applied by the holy Ghoft,to your Juftifkation and Salvation. God hath now fuffered you to live to years of difcretion , I muft therefore put you in remembrance that you Jiir up the gift or Grace of God, which is in you , as Paul fpeaketh to Timothy, 2 Tim. 1.6. (I cannot lay by the putting on of my hands, but I may) by the pouring on of that water with my hands. The word in the original is *V*Jam/pei p , to ftir up that fire of the Spirit I fpake of, and to quicken up the grace of Baptifm that hath lien under the afhes throughout your youthful and finful dayes of ignorance, that fo now it may kindle and burn brighter in you. You are now to beftir your Jfelf in reading the Word, and hearing it preached by fuch Minifters as God fendeth into the Church -, and amongft them, him efpecially who baptized you at fir0-, that fo you may come to Faith by fuch means, and by Faith now,actually lay hold on the promifes of the Covenant of Grace, touching, Juftification, Rerruffion , and Adoption, and enjoy them to your ttfe and comfort s which were but made andfeaiedm your Baptifm, as to every Elett Childe of God. and O eftated io6 ft* fab Infanubaftifm hath thtright and title, ^ftated upon you on Gods part as to your Right and Tit le •, I do not fay, that your Baptifm properly did giveyou,or prima- rily, the Right and lntereft you have unto God and Chrift , (Gods free Covenant and promife did it) but it fealed up one- ly, and mainly confirmeth that Right and lntereft which you had already, even then in Gods Govenant and Promife : Cods Word is as good ash. s Bond, and his Promife as effe&ual a* his Seal : your Baptifm (as the other Sacrament^ was not for theftrengthningor erTectualizing of Gods Covenant, but to the confirming and fupporting your faith in apprehending it. I would make this very plain to you^ hoping it maybe for fomegood to you. Suppofe an Eftate made over unto you in your Infancy ,by a Will and Teftament under Seal,you have not indeed during your minority ^any fenfible ufe and benefit thereof, becaufe of your incapability , but yet the Right and Title is not vain, but true and real, and ftands firmely fecured unto you to be claimed, and enjoyed to your ufe, good and benefit, what time foever you come to be capable of it^fo that you (hall not need to look after a new Will, or fealed Conveyance there- of, the firft being in force and efte&ual: Evenfo, God by Will and Covenant hath made over, as it were,Chrift with all his Merits, Righteoufnefs, and all Graces accompanying Salvati- on to you, as ftill fuppofed an El'etl child , born of believing Pa- rents, in thofe words, ( I will be thy God, and the God of thy feed) and fealed the fame in Baptifm unto you, and you have made little or nothing of it for a long while, as to your comfort and benefit thereby, by reafon of your uncapablenefs of them, by your ignorance and want of knowledge, faith, &c. yet your Might and Title to Chrift and all his Merits, was and is, good and real, 2nd flood, and ftands firmely fecured unto you, and fealed in your Baptifm, and whenfoever you come to undcrftand what grant God hath fealed to you in Baptifm, and do actually lay hold upon by Faith, and refolve to come out ofyeur fins, as it feems lately ; and you fay, (The Grace of God appeared^ hing- ing you to the .knowledge of the Truth , and plucking you from your evil vrayes) then you may lay claim to them all, and fhall have the comfortable benefit, andfinde, and feel the effe- ctual fruit of your Baptifm, fo that you needed not have look- ed out after another ntw Will or Covenant, or another new Seal of though mtfenft and bene ft of the CcvenMt, &c. 1 07 of the fame Covenant (the old being ftill in force and in effed) to the flighting of God in hisown Ordinance, and to the intro- ducing of a new Bufinefs ; and fo in a maner, fating your pofts to Gods pofi , Exek. 43 . 8 . and fetting altar againfi altar, yea, Baal before Goo1. Is it mt,becaufe there is not a God in Ifrael, that thou fendefi to enquire of Baal&bub the God of Ekron ? 2 Kings 1.6. So was it not becaufe there was no Baptifm in our Church, or your bapti- zing of our Church was not (as you thought) in force and effi- cacy, that you ran out to the Anabaptifi to be dipt and laverd in a Pond, or to be ponded and plunged at Laver ? This indeed was occalioned through great ignorance and profanenefsinpart, that you hadfo mean andbafe opinion of the outward Sign and Seal of your Infant-baptifm, and the ver- cue and efficacy thereof, as if it were a mecr myfterial Ceremony and facramental Complement for the prefent time , to give the Childe a Name, and there an end, and no farther matter or be- nefit for the future. Know then, and I pray mark it ierioufly,that you may know it and I may not beat onely the air and your ear, but alfo the heart and the fire in you, (if you be of Gods Elecl) that your Jnfant-baptifm was of \ertue,andcttt&ual to the taking away of the guilt of fin. and to the furtherance ofyourfalvation, not onely in that hour it was taken and received by you from me in your Infancy , but it is, and may be, and will be (if you be not the hinderance thereunto, and to your felf ) of force, and pow- erful to the fame good ends for the time future , and to come ; yea, throughout your whole life time , as alfo in all other fuch, as are eled children of God , truly and inwardly baptized or regenerate. . i The which truth , as being of great moment inandagainlt this new bufinefs of yours , I will prove both by Scripture and Reafon, and both briefly ■, (fori confefs I am too tedious and long, but it is that J might do you the more good, and Baptifm the more right) St. Mark^\6. 16. faith, He that believethand is baptised, (ball befaved : is baptized, in prefent for the ad and fome prefent benefit • but itextendeth its vertue farther to time ■ future, for hefhallbefaved. 3 Col.Z: 12. They are buried with Chrift in baptifm, and'are \q Nnnn 2 rift* i o 3 Baftifm effcftuAl event* e verlaftwg, rifen with him.They are fo,now a long time after,finding the ver- tue and effects thereof who were ion ^before baptized as to the a&, and fome initial fruits thereof, i Pet. 3. 21. Even Baftifm doth now alfo Juve m • now in our latter dayes it faveth us, though in former times received by us. So in reafon it muft be fo, for r>ap:ifm is, and was to you, the Sacrament of \ our mftion and ingrafting intoChrift, fealing up your fetting into Chrift the which you needed but once, and never after ro be done ag-tin ^ for the force thereof goethon and continueth for all times, as % grafted Crab-ftock holdeth on and continueth, bearing ahofrur ,if it be not brokenoff. Once tngrafcing, though oiten nounfhing, once regenerating, and alwa esincrcaiing lscheGraceofChrift.andthelifeofaChri- ftian : and if it were not fo, that the force of our once being baptized did continue and reach tothewafhing off all the fins of our whole time \ Wfey then, you would have upon every fin, which is a feparation of you from God , a new ingrafting , and fo a new feal of it, Baptifsn,or fomewhat elfe. Secondly, becaufe as long as the Covenant it felf is of force andverfe&ual, fo long is Baptifm of force and effectual ^ that be- ing the foundation and fubftance of this, (as every promife or covenant is of the feal) in which God promifeth and cavermnt- eth to, and with the party, baptized inwardly, to be their <3od, and the God of their feed. But this covenant of the Grace of God to you, and all hisEled children,is eternal,and fo effedual at all times •, fo Efay $4*. 10. The mountains {hall remove, and the hills {hall fall down, but my mercy (kail not depart away from thee, neither /ball the covenant of my peace fall away, faith the Lord,wko hath compajpen on thee. And fo Jeremy 32.40. I will make (faith the Lord) an everlafting covenant with them , that I wilt never tarn away from them to do them gotd, but I will put my fear in their hearts that they /ball not depart from me. So hence may fairly be inferred and concluded , That the Covenant of Gods grace with you being eternal, the Seal of this Covenant, which isBaptifm, is alfo eternal for the efficacy thereof ^ not limited to any time, much lefs the time it is in taking: and therefore being imprinted upon you in your Infancy , according to Gods Covenant with you in your Infancy, (the god of thy feed) At is of force and venue to you, throughout all your lifetime , yea, to all eternity. Now therefore never to be renounced, l09 Now then, Sir, did you not very evil to obfcure the Grace of God appearing to | ou , and to plunge your felf into fuchan evil way, and fhew fuch ignorance of the word, as to renounce and lay afide an effectual and powerful ChriftianBapiitm, ready and prefent at all times, in the fruits and effects thereof,to com- fort and fupport you upon your faith and repentance, and all this for impotent, element, and beggar Ij rudiment, as theApo- ftle fpeaketh, Col. 2.22. (foi I may add your Affirmative of Dip again, to their Negatives, To/tch not, tafie not, which all are to ftrijh with ufng) ordinances after the commandments of men having indeed a Jhew of reifdom in YVill-worfkip aud Humi- lity, and negleciing of the bo&y, not in any honour to the fatisfying vi the flejb, on fantlifying either flefh or fpirit , or which is nei- ther feal of anyCovenant by Gods inftitution,neither leaves any benefit behinde it in the prefent ad , nor carrieth any good be- fore irto the future life j as you will fee when the fcales fall off from your eyes which now hang upon them. In this you did but run along with the Papifts, if you did not out-run them : they teach that Baptifm of Infants taketh away all fin that goeth before it,(as Original fin) but for fins commit- cd after (as actual ones) they mull be taken away by their devi- led Sacrament of Penance , or Repentance And your matters have taught and told you, that they muft be taken away , and that after Repentance hath taken them away, by their forged Sacrament of Re-dipping 5 and fo both of you do, though in feveral wayes, deftroy the true nature and ufe of Baptifm, which is the Laver for all fins, pafi, prefent, and to come , to be wafhed in and away, as to the guilt and filth of them. True, that Repentance is alfo another good way to take off Gns committed, and to procure the remifiion of them , accord- ing to Gods Promife and Covenant s but it muft not thruft out Baptifm, to bring in it felf to be a Sacrament of Fennance, as the Papifts would have it \ nor lay afide your Infant-baptifm, to carry you out to a Man-dippifm, as the Anabaptifts have ferved. you: For that your Infant-baptifm being the Seal of the eter- nal Covenant, is ever effectual and of force •, and upon the re- pentance of your adual fins,atany time wuatfoever,will,& doth comfortably affure and feal unto both, the pardon and remifliT on of them • fo that;there will need no ffew Sacrament to be fee x ! p Baptifm tfftftual even to everla(lfrgy up by them, of penance, nor any fecond dipping to be pra&i- ied by you, as a Sacrament of profeflion, as I may call it. Nay more, Repentance, Faith, &c. Conversion, San&ifica- tion,areall but as the fruits and effe&s of the Covenant of Grace, offered and fealed to, on Gods part, by his Spirit of Grace •, and alfo, but the parts and conditions of the fame Co- venant of Grace entered into, and fealed to on your part to do and perform by the operation of the fame Spirit, in theufe of the means of Grace : fo that therefore thofe, and all otheu fuch like, do continue and demonftrate both to Papifts and Ana^ baptifts, the efficacy of thefirft Infant- baptifm, which runneth along, and even liveth in them. And, Sir, as to your felf, take it from me, and be no longer miftaken from thofe who make but merchandice of your foul, as they do of the Word. Whatfoever things are truefm you \ to ufe the words of St. Paul^hil^.S. Whatfoever things are ho-] neft) in you, whatfoever things atcjufi, in you, whatfoever things are pare, in you, whatfoever things are lovely Sa you, whatfoever twines are , make it to be more publickly known abroad in this County •, and Se- condly, give notice hereof to Afercurins Voliticm , to Print it in his weekly Intelligences, to be communicated to all other Counties, and the whole Common-wealth, that at Kettring's Houfe in Afuch-leigbes, ofEtfex, there is a Pond, wherein,upon once dipping, two Sifters have been inftantly , the one cured of a Confumption, the other much filled with Comfort ^ And you will have, out of hand, all thcftorrowfttlfouls, and Confumpti- ohs bodies in the Nation, at leaftwife this County, come flocking to your Houfe • as theblinde and the halt did to the Pool of Be- rfo>/^Joh.5.2,3,4.and then,I hope you know how to deal with chem,and to make your gain of yourPond^namely none to ftep in, until the Aneel go down firft and move the water,& fo make way for him or her ^ (for I believe the water is as good for a him . as a her, die man as the woman)And to encourage you the more hereunto- Ill Baptifm effectual even t$ tvtriafing^ hereunto, I fhall not take any occasion or advantage to raife your Rent hereupon, one penny in the year, fo that [you will keep the JW/;;; good Repair, and in its venue and efficacy ', by f couring and fencing about, fo as it may continue therein, unto my Heirs and Executors •, onely I pitty the lofs and damage (if not undoing) that will hereby come to Tunbridge waters in Kent, and Barnet water in Hart ford- fhire, and the Bath wa- ters of Sommerfet -pjire ,and the waters of the Spaw beyond Sea may be fomewhat endamaged hereby, and Ebefham waters in Surrey : I, but here's comfort^ You and this Town may be be- nefited hereby. But I will onely tell you at this time, how much worfe you are, and will be in your foul falvation, and the peace of your confcience, by this your new bufinefs of being Re-dipped, un- leis you repent of it timely and truly, and turn again to God and his Covenant, and trie Seal thereof, your Infant-baptiim and renew them to your benefit and comfort, by faith laying claim and hold of them, and never let your firft Right and T - tie to them, and the grace of them go , and fo they will never let their hold and tenure go of you and your foul. I know not whether I faid it before, or no, for my papers are now out of my fight, and fo out of my mind^butif I did,I will fay it again, after the example, oftheApoftle Gal I<5,7,8,o. / marvelled ycu wenfofoon moved away fnm him, (my felf) who called you unto the Seal of Grace, Baptifm, and to the hearing of the G off el, unto another. Baptifm and Go/pel, "which is mt another, (there being but one Gofpel and Baptifm ) But there be fome that trouble you, and would pervert the Gofpel-Covenant , and Gofpel-Baptifm of Chrift, But though we (I think we (hall not) or they, ('they do it indeed) or an- Angel from Heaven (neither will any Angel J preach any other Gofptl unto you (or any other Gofpel-Baptifm, preach it, or pradife it) then that which we have preached (and pra&ifed) unto you, let him be accurfed ; And now here, as the Apoftle addeth, As I faid before, fo fay I now again y If any man (from Earth transforming him felf into an Angel of light J preach any other Gofpel unto you (preach or pra- ctice any other Gofpel, Covenant, or Baptifm ) then that ye have received fet him be accurfed. Let him be onely of me accu- fed-, he maybe both of you and yours, both accufed an& ac- curfed. Sir, Exhortation to a high efeem »f Infant- faptifmj 113 Sir, I have been the bolder with you,and the larger in my difcourfe, for that I fear you have not been furticiently taught ( and yet even in this point of Bapt fm,l havealfo formerly catechized you , with the other young men of my Parifh, when for three years togecher I made it my Afternoons buhnefs on the Lords day) by your Parents, or thofe who did as Sponfors or Sureties, undertake for \ou, the meaning and Doctrine or your Infant-baptifm ; when ) ou came to ) ears of under- Handing, uniolding unto you Gods precious Promiies therein, made to you, and your iTrift Engagements ftipultated to God by them: and if fo it be, then alfo you ought f ■ much the more, no,v you know their default, and underitand your felf, to be more earned: , ferious, and laborious in learning it out, and teaching your felr the fame. For th tt which teacheft another, (as my lelf you afTayed to do in your Let- ter; teaches thu not thy felf ? Rrm. 2 21. But ifalfo you are not ether able or willing of your felf to do ei- ther^ then be content, another, and amonglt others, my felf, who be- ing your Minifter and Paftor, not , yea, it will be of continual ufc and benefit to you„ if you will return to it, and reflect upon it by your faith, and lay hold upon the precious things and promifes thereof. In a word, Though you have departed away from your Covenant by breaking of the Seal thereof, and flighting your Baptifm, yet God is not gone from either, but what he hath Covenanted and Sealed, is and will be ever ready to make good, Come therefore and return unto the Lord, fot you have torn, and he will heal , you have broken, and he will binde up*, yea, and he hath torn,a.nd he will heal, he hath broken, and he will binde up ; in all your fins and tranfgreflions, which are your breaches of the Law, and the tearing! of Gods Covenant , in all his afflictions and chaftifements,which are his breaches upon you, wcA h s tearings of you in your eftate, nay, in all your fears and doubts, return unto the Lord, and his Covenant of Graceand Mercy -, look back to your veal of it, your Baptifm, and lay hold on it by Faith, even but now renew your Faith,in the Promifes theroff & renew alfo yourRepentance for breach ©f Covenant and Promife on your part)you (hall find the erfed of that you never faw,and feel actual comfort,& even prefent benefit thereof. Once more , Have nowrecourfe, and go with all fpeed to your firft Infant-baptifm, and remember and believe that God hath therein, fealed up unto you his love, and favour to you in Chrift, and that his everlafting Covenant of Grace, and Peace, and Reconciliation, to be your God in Chrift for ever , and will never fail you, feeking and having recourfe to him, his Covenant and Seal This will fill you full of heavenly comfort in the midft of forrow, and upon Repentance, give you good afTurance of the pardon of all your fins whatfoever, even of this, none of your leaft fins , your cauflefs Revolt and Sefa* ration from the Church, Miniftery, and Baptifm appointed and appro- ved of God. A Communion with which, if you will truly re-enter into, and fe- Pppp 2 noufly j x s Exhortation tiforftke the Separatiw, rioufly return unto, pleading fas you may even yetj your Right and Inter eft in the Covenant of Grace, fealed unto you in your firft In- fant-baptifw, once for ever, ( you doing the Condition thereof,) God alfo will then remember his Covenant entred into with you8then once for ever, and will have compaffwn onyou-, andrun out and meet you, fall on your neck, and kifs you, Luke 15.20, 2r. fo that you (hall notonely have a clear and \v\\ Remiffion o£ this, and all other your (ins wafhed away in the blood of Chriit, (the fubftance of the Covenant,) but alfo enjoy the fweet and comfortable fruits and benefits of that your Bap- tifm, the Seal of fuch Covenant, even an ajfurance of God his being your God, and the God of your feed, and that for ever -t and of your being one of his people, and a member of Chrift fefm, and that alfo for ever : So that you may fay as the Spoufe of Chrift, (for fo the foul is contracted unto Chrift, by the Covenant, and it is efpoufed, or the efpoufals zx^folemni^ed and ratified in Baptifm) lam my Beloved?, And my Beloved is mine, Cant.6.3 . And now, Six, am I become your enemy, becaufe I have told you, and others, the Truth, and (hewed unto yon the good, even the good old Way ? If fo, then the God of Truth, who fet me sworkfa my friend, as Abrahams, and deliver me out of your hands, and the hands of all mine enemies •, and if God and the Truth be on my fide, I care not much who be againft me, nor do I fear what man and error on the con- trary fide can do. Magis arnica Veritas, maxime amicus Ghrijlus , qui eft ipfa Veritas & vita. But Sir, by that time you have fadly thought upon, and confidered what J have laid, & fully digefted & ruminated that over which I have written, you and they, (but you efpecially I aim at) Hyill fee me a real, cordial, foul- friend of yours,as who have endeavored to come unio you as a Pillar of fire, ratherthen a cloud, not to darken you with obfeure ' difcourfes,but to enlighten you with clear evidences, & fo to lead you out of your by-way es of Errors, into the plain Path of Truth, and ra- ther to Convert you, then confound you. I fay your foul-friend ; for feeing once your foul alfo belonged to my Curam Arimarum, and yon were formerly one of the (heep of my Paftor-fold, one of the fouls that were nu m bred into my Paftoral charge, you fee I count you fo ftill, though you have broke loofe-, and feparated your felf from my Hock anu feed, yet, I have not let you fo go,nor have I releafed to you, : hough you have remifedto me -, nor have I discharged you, though ran have difmijfed mc 5 yea, you may fee me your foul-friend yet far. ther» tndrewntotht Congregation, 117 ther, in that I have (not run away, or lien hi3 in a corner, as the Hireling) but as a loving Paftor, have followed after the Wolf and the Fox running away with you, like as alfo David did go after the Lion and the Bear, taking a Lamb out of his fold ; yea, and when the Wolf alfo turned head againft me , and came upon me, as the Lion didarifeand ramp upon 'David, I caught him by the Beard, and mouth, and flew him, for all his roaring quirks and howling queries -, andfo have delivered you f if you will be delivered) from the fpirit of bondage, and love not your chain and fetters of their Errors, more then the Freedom and Liberty of Truth, for if the Truth, or the Son cf God, who is the Truth, have made, or Jhall make you free , then you are free indeed. Now then, and laftly, Sir, fhew your felf a true Ifra- elite, come and hear the Truth, and know your friends, the foul-truth, which is the fole-truth, and your foul-friends, which are your fole- friends, and come away from thofe Task-mailers that lay heavy bur- thens upon your bodies, and dip them under water over head and cars, for their own gain more then yours, and for their advantage to an evil caufe. Forego your bondage, and d*rkfiefs of *s£gypt, which goeth under the name of New-light and Liberty - forget your gar- lick, Onions and Flefh-pots, which they ca\\,The Spirit, and the fruits of the Spirit-,vun from their hot furnaces,and rajh fires, which they tearm Zeal^keep away from their Ponds & cold waters, which they call Dip- ping & Baptizing- depart from the Tents of thofe that practice Rebelli- on under pretence of Religion & Holines^fhake off your fellowjhip with their unfruitful works and word$,andf as you have heard ) unprofitable Preachings and Teachings prefumed upon, under the Title of a gifted Brother-hood and Fraternity -, leave tilt. Citizens or Farmers field, and the Husks there, and arife and go to your Fathers houfe,. the Church of God, where is bread enough, zn& to fyzre, for the fervants, and much more for the Sons. Get loofefrom thofe Bufbes and Brambles where you are are entangled , before you lofeall the wool off your back, and be fleeced by them. Come novo then, and let us reafon together ', faith the Lord , though your fins beat fcarlet ,. they Jhall be white as J now, though they be red like crimfom, they Jhall be as wool. If you be willing and obedient, you Jhall eat the good of the Land ; but if you refufe and re-. bet, you Jhall be devoured with the [word, for the mouth of the Lord hath fpokenittiafky 1.18,19,20. Yea, come and return, as to the Lord, fb to your Paftor. Here's the right hand of fellowjhip and true Brother- hood, I offer unto you, to fet you free, aud to help you out, and to defend* II 3 Exhortation to for fake the Separation,- defend you againft them •, yea, and now that I have been long going after you as a loft fheep, and one of my hundredfold, and have found' you at lait, I will lay you on my fhoulders, to bring you home again, and wil undergo any labour and pains for ydurReveriion & Redu&ion; bearing alfo with your former defeds or defaults, with patience and meeknefs, as the Apoftle bids we fhould bear one another •$ burthens ,Gal. 6.2. yea, and I (hall call togethei our friends and neighbour j-,to a pub- lick rejoycing and thankfgiving , bearing alfo the Burthen of the Song or Pfalm my felf, and faying, Rejoyce with me, for I have found my fheep which was loft •, yea, and the bltjfed Angels above will be of the Quire-, and there will be joy in Heaven ever one [inner that repent eth, as your felf} yea, and Chnft Jefas, the Great fhepheard of all the (hecp; and of all fouls, will embrace your returning, delight in you, ) Vho hi* own felf bare your fins in his own body on the Tree, I Pet. 2 . 24. For you was as a (heep going aftray, but if you (hall return unto this Shepherd and Bifhop of your foul , When the chief Shepherd JhaU appear, ycu fijall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away, whereby you will be glorified in heaven •, and in the mean time he wilfputa Crown of Right eoufnefs upon your head that falieth not off , whereby you (hall be both juftified and fandiried alfo. Nay, your felf will thus become a Crown if rejoycing to us all, jmy felf efpecially •, For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoycing ? Are not evenyiu in the pre/ence of cur Lord *hfw at hi* coming ? Tea , you are our glory and joy, 1 Thef. 2.19. Therefore , my brother, dearly beloved and lenged for, my joy and crown, Phil. 4. 1 . return unto the Lord, (the Lords Church and Flock, the Lords Miniftery and Pafturage, the Lords C ovenant with Parents and their Children, the Lords Baptifra and Sheep-mark) and fo ft and faft in the Lcrd my dearly beloved. Now the God of peace that brought trgain from the dead our Lord Jefus , that great Shepherd of the Jhcep, through the Blood cf the ever lofting Covenant, make you perfetl in every good work^ (of righteoufnefs arid word of truth) working in you that which if well-pleafing in hus fight, through fefus Chrift , to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. Hcb. 13. 20, 21. If yet, notwithstanding all this friendly invitation and fair warn- ing, you will not hear and hearken to come in, but will go ftill aftray, J\4y foul flail weep in fecret places for your pride ; and mine eyes fball run down with tears , becaufe the Lords ftock^ (and your klf for one amongft them) U carried away captive, Jer. 13. 17. Wherefore I take jou to record this day (in which you have read over what to return to the Congregation. Il9 •what I have written to you) that I am pare from the blood of you all y (you and all, for what I fay unto you, I fay unto all) for J have not fhunned to declare unto you aH the counfel of God, Ads 20.26, 27. in thefe particulars that he hath out of his Word revealed unto me. Andfo I have delivered my foul, as to you and them, by foretelling and forewarning you of the truth, as a Watchman fet over you, Ez,c k. 33. 9. if you will not deliver your foul, by obeying the truth, and fubmit thereunto, when it is held out to you, by him who hath the rule, or guide and overfight of you, and watcheth for your foul, and mufi give account, and would do it with joy and not with grief (for that it unprofitable for you, Heb. 1 3 . 1 7. ) Then , you will die in your iniquity. and obftinacy, your blood will be required at your own hands , and will lie upon your own head. \ who can help it , unlefs God forbid it , the which alfo God forbid, J fray God. Yea, once more alfo. I call heaven and earth to record this day againft you, Deut. 30. 19. (or for you) that I have fet before you life and death , Bleffmg and Cur- bing ; therefore chufe life, that both thou and thy feed may live , And that then may eft love the L'ord thy God, and that his-Co-uenant that he made (to be thy God, and the God of thy feed) and thai thou mayefi obey his voyce, and that command for the baptizing of trie Parent and his Seed: That thou mayefi cleave unto him,2sA not forfake your God in Cove- nant with you,fealed in your Infancy , by renouncing your Baptifm theny and now running after other unprofitable Dippings vfor he is thy life, and the length of thy dayes, that thou may eft dwell here on earth a while, and alfo be in Heaven for ever. And now to him that is of power to eftablipj you, according to the Gofpel and preaching of fefus Chrift ,, and the Revelation of the my fiery , which was kept fecret fince the world began , but now is made manifefl , and by the Scriptures of the 'Prophets, according to the Commandement of the Bverlajling Godrmade known to all Nations, for the obedience of Faith ; To Godonely wife, be glory through fefus Chrift, for ever, Amen. Rom, 1625,26,27. To which onely wife God and his Providence, committing my felf, and what I have v/ritten here^as likewife to the fame onelv good God, and his blefling commending you, and what you (hall read here, even to the Word of his Grace, which is able to build you up, . who are fallen from that, of Baptifm, and to eftablifh all that ftand therein, I take my leave, and give you farewel, refting your affectionate, and infe\a-~ rate ? aft or and Friend, '' fefry Watts. F I N H, errata: ET/jf/r to the Reader, page i. t. 8. read ^rinter^p. it. /. %ui. rifMel a 19./. i6.r word.p.x^ l,ij.r.evevtp.x^.l 13 r.H)pocrithal,p. jJ.iS.r iwu. } 2.. Stow gin blot (iut,tto,p.^^.l 6r.of,p 44 l.\ iMot out. that p. + 5 /.4, *.?»*, /M*^ \7>rtben,p.6i LiZ.r rujiicity.p *s I. unintentional, p. 79 1.7, blot outyfdve, p.&i.i.n- b ot out, and not obferve the \%.)eart feeing tbtijtwst bapti\ed at j~o. years oid,p 94./.^/?. r. /<*/-,/>.? 9 1. 16. r. account, p. 10 1 I. 16, for Cur, r.tht p iOz Lxr.off-ipring, p.io* l.\ z.r ufeful, p 'ry. l.n.r.ordinary^p. lii f.38 r. Pnrbytir, p 123. /. g fc/«t o«i,ro, l.ii.r.TrofeQion, p.128. /.jj. r s/h^ 7i««. p.tf 5 /-jo. frtor c«f. >*w4t,p 116 i. S.6/«r em, 10 e«r wio/i agreeable p i*o,l j8 for as,r.a> p.l^O.l f.bil* out, (o, p. 2f^-x... Running title, for hwar€tp i56./.}l.r. dev fingy p 27 ?•'• l8- r.breihreny p. 274 J. j i,r.c«wt, p.176 I. 3 7. r./c, />.z;8./. z. T.b*vemad^pi9o.l.i.*dd , jou. Of Baptifm. Page 14 line $i read veitb , p ,$6 running ntletr, not practical. p,6z I, $ r,ai» P»7* 'jSJ rO'»Mr«P>73 J'1* fir cb*p:r,Ver(etp,74 l,j blot outran d p t%7 '^oadd, i .p 100 /,i8 blot ourtin.p 103 l.xi r, tbey.ptt 17 l^qr,a\xta)es p xji /,!$, r, (he. |,i7 biotcu'y'f > Mo/ i6r,Apoftlep, 1 41 /, 38 r,ifcr.p 14J / 35 r,procreating0 7,151 i 37 T.the/e.p. i%7 />n r.friend.p,i6i /,j^ /er canyrjou p.. 64^7 aid^as p,»98 /,$* XyApo^Uiyi,^ for ytare>r,veert, l,i«.,for to,r,doe. The Dipper Sprinkled. P*£f 13 UneSread f>uit :,ig /,jj r,njugbtine(s.p:i7 f,i6 r.pcca.p, 2Sf,il aidi^-p jo/, 2 r,M\v[Aii„3fdj: p,j7 '1* blot tut, die/p,** /a* r.feur,p, Bi /, 18 r, ptttijfimum. f-iy .A