/in The Glory of the Ministry Other Books by PROF. A. T. ROBERTSON Critical Notes to Broadus's Harmony of the Gospels. Life and Letters of John A. Broadus. Teaching of Jesus Concerning God the Father. Keywords in the Teaching of Jesus. Syllabus for New Testament Study. Students' Chronological New Testament. Epochs in the Life of Jesus. Epochs in the Life of Paul. Jonn the Loyal. Studies in the Minis- try of the Baptist. A Short Grammar of the Greek New Testament. A Commentary on the Gospel Accord- ing to Matthew. The Glory of the Ministry Paul's Exultation in Preaching By A. T. ROBERTSON, M. A., D. D. Professor of New Testament Interpretation in The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Ky. NOV 20 1990 New York Chicago Toronto Fleming H. Revell Company London and Edinburgh Copyright, 191 1, by FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY New York: 158 Fifth Avenue Chicago: 123 North Wabash Ave. Toronto: 25 Richmond Street, W. London: 21 Paternoster Square Edinburgh: 100 Princes Street To The Rev. James Stalker, M. A,, D. D, Professor in the United Free Church College, Aberdeen, Preacher, Teacher, Inspirer of Preachers Preface IT is now a good many years since the beauty of Paul's apologetic for preaching in 2 Corinthians ii. i2-vi. 10 made its first appeal to me. As with much that has entered my life, it was the close study of the Greek text with a class in Greek exegesis that first gripped my heart with this noble pane- gyric on the ministry of the servants of Jesus Christ. It is not mere rhapsody on Paul's part, but a mag- nificent exposition of the preacher's task from every point of view. I have made it my duty and joy to present this lofty spiritual interpretation of the min- ster's work to succeeding classes of theological students. Last November in South Carolina I made an address on " The Glory of the Ministry " as pre- sented by Paul in this passage. It brought cheer and hope to the hearts of some of the toilers for Christ to the extent that a number of them privately asked me to write a little book on the subject. I have not been able to get away from this appeal. My life is constantly with ministers. I know much of the struggles, ambitions, hopes, joys, and disap- pointments of preachers of the Gospel, both young 7 8 PREFACE and old. The lines have not fallen in pleasant places for all of them. They are subject to much misun- derstanding. Modern and pubUc opinion is distinctly- critical, if not at times harsh, towards the minister. It is not always easy in an unsympathetic atmosphere to preserve the right spirit and to see things as they really are. I have written this book out of love for preachers of the Gospel of Jesus. Some one may find tonic and ozone, as he comes close to the heart of his mission and Hfe, in Paul's bracing words. Some, for whom the ministry no longer has the old charm, may recover their first love. Some, who have been disposed to speak unkindly of ministers as a class, may be led to revise their judgment. Some young men, who look out on the wonderful modern world, may catch a glimpse of the light in the face of Jesus, as did Paul on the road to Damascus, and yield to the appeal in that Face for a world lost in sin, a world that calls for interpreters of Jesus. I pray that the Spirit of Christ may go with this little book and take it where it is needed. The volume is not a mere exposition of Paul's own glorying in the ministry, though that is the heart of it. Paul's grand conception is related to modern ideas of the ministry by sufficient use of the great writers of our time on the preacher's problems. These are shown to share Paul's enthusiasm. The PREFACE 9 flame of the Lord that burned in Paul's breast blazes yet. Many of the noblest spirits of our time an- swer the call of Christ with joy and gladness of heart. The substance of this book was delivered in ad- dresses before the Tabernacle Bible Conference (Atlanta, Ga., March, 191 1), but the book has been written independently of that occasion. A. T. Robertson. Louisville^ Ky, Contents I The Disheartened Preacher's Joy— The New Standpoint . 13 II The Glory that Faded — The Modern Problem . 51 III The Light in the Face of Jesus— The Attraction of Christ . 83 IV With Open Face — The Preacher's Privilege . 113 V This Treasure in Earthen Vessels — The Human Limitations . 141 VI The Weight of Glory— . The Invisible Consolation 10 1 VII Well Pleasing Unto Him — The Preacher's Master Passion . • • ^79 VIII In Glory and Dishonour — Taking Life as It Is . 207 II I THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY —THE NEW STANDPOINT (2 Cor, a. i2-iii. 6) « I had no relief for my spirit . . . But thanks be unto God, who always leadeth us in triumph in Christ." —5 Cor. a. 13 f* THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY— THE NEW STANDPOINT I. The Ground of Paul's Discouragement IT was chiefly the situation in Corinth, a church that Paul had founded.* He loved this church very greatly. It seemed to have the greatest opportunity for usefulness and power of any of the European churches. It was in a new atmosphere of wealth and progress. The city had been restored by Julius Caesar after being in ruins for a hundred years since Mummius destroyed it. It was more open to the Gospel than Athens where a fondness for philosophical speculation made it hard to win a foothold.'^ Corinth had been more fertile ground. Indeed, Paul had succeeded only too well there, for the Jews soon grew jealous of his power.^ Two years * Paul had lived and laboured in this great and wicked metropolis. It had not been in vain. He had seen the ruler of the Jewish synagogue, Crispus, become a Christian.^ He had received from Gallio, * Acts xviii. I-20. 'Acts xvii. 16-34. ^ Acts xviii. 5-17. *Acts xviii. II, 18. 6 Acts xviii. yf. 15 l6 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY the new proconsul, the first official permission to preach the Gospel in the Roman Empire that gave Christianity a new standing in the Province of Achaia.' Paul loved the church in Corinth with his whole heart. " For though ye have ten thousand tutors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers ; for in Christ Jesus I begat you through the Gospel."^ But a series of mishaps had come to the work in Corinth. One disaster had followed another till Paul feared the very worst. Few sadder experiences come to the preacher than to see the work of his heart crumble away after he has left it. Almost all of the modern preacher's difficulties confronted Paul in the work at Corinth. He could not shake off *' that which presseth upon me daily, anxiety for all the churches." ^ The pressure^ was like a nightmare that weighed upon him unceasingly. The anxiety '^ ate into his soul like corroding rust. Paul knew how to preach: " In nothing be anxious." ^ But it is easier to preach than to practice. No church pressed upon Paul's heart quite so heavily as did » Ramsay, "St. Paul the Traveller," pp. 257 f.; Robertson, " Epochs in the Life of Paul," pp. 165 f.; Acts xviii. 12-17. 2 I Cor. iv. 15. ' 2 Cor. xi. 28 ^ iT:i 2 Cor. vii. 5. « 2 Cor. vii. 8. * 2 Cor. vii. 5. * 2 Cor. vi. 5 ; cf. 2 Cor. xi. 27. 8 2 Cor. vii. 5. Present perfect tense. « Note the anacoluthon due to Paul's passion. ' 2 Cor. vii. 5. THE NEW STANDPOINT 31 know. The words suggest actual conflicts of some sort. He had fights with " wild beasts at Ephesus," * probably referring to his enemies. Perhaps on board the ship Paul encountered some old or new enemies (Jews, Gentiles, or Judaizers), for he had many kinds of foes.2 The " fears within " were the ever present apprehensions. These were his worst foes, those of the mind. It is, in truth, a mournful picture that the great apostle has drawn of himself at this crisis in his Hfe. We see Paul here in his hour of weakness. It is not a just picture of himself which we get, but it is a true portrayal of his outlook on the world at this juncture. There is thus a bond of sympathy between this greatest of all the ministers of Jesus and the humblest one to-day who may be thrown down by the world spirit. If Paul is able to look on the bright side of the preacher's life, he knows what the dark side is. There is plenty of cloud in his life to set off the light. Indeed, when Paul is driven to boast of his work in comparison with that of the Judaizers at Corinth it is the catalogue of his trials which he counts.^ He has his " prisons," his "stripes," his "shipwreck," his "perils" of various kinds, his " watchings often," his " hunger and thirst." " If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things that concern my weakness." But just now 1 1 Cor. XV. 32. 2 2 Cor. xi. 26. ^ 2 Cor. xi. 23-33. 32 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY Paul cannot glory even in his weakness. He cannot glory in anything. He is a broken man, broken in spirit and in body. Who can help Paul now?' This is not the time for Paul to take stock of his ministry. 4. The Rebound of Heart at Philippi Without a word of explanation Paul leaps out of the Slough of Despond and springs like a bird to the heights of joy.^ He soars aloft like an eagle with proud scorn of the valley beneath him. " But thanks be unto God who always leadeth us in triumph in Christ." ^ A high-strung nature like that of Paul is capable of such extremes of emotion. Laughter and tears lie close to each other. Joy lives next door to sorrow, ay, in the same house and heart. Many a preacher can bear glad testimony to the psycho- logical correctness of Paul's description of his sudden transition from night to day. We are accustomed to sudden, even violent, digressions ^ in Paul's writings, and the matter, in the light of his relations with > 2 Cor. xi. 29, 2 Bachmann, Der Zweiie Brief des Pauliis an die Korinther. S. 124, says : " Aus der Tiefe in die Hohe." 3 2 Cor. ii. 14. 4 '« Instead of giving details of the information which Titus brought to him in Macedonia (vii. 6), he bursts out into a characteristic doxology, which leads him into a long digression, the main topic of the epistle not coming into view again until vi. II." Bernard, " Expositor's Greek Testament," in loco. THE NEW STANDPOINT 33 Corinth, would be sufficiently clear from the knowl- edge that Titus met Paul in Philippi with better news from Corinth than he had anticipated. At once the clouds had lifted and the sky was clear again. But, at this point in the Epistle, Paul is completely carried away with joy at the coming of Titus, too entirely swept off into rhapsody to make any explanation of his emotions. He does make the explanation later in the Epistle ' after he has come back to earth. It is just this rhapsody with which this book is con- cerned, but, before proceeding with that, it will be well to notice Paul's explanation of his state of exalta- tion. " Nevertheless He that comforteth the lowly, even God, comforted us by the coming of Titus." ^ The word " comfort " ^ is a common one, particularly in this Epistle. It combines the notions of exhorta- tion and consolation. Paul was glad to see Titus, for he dearly loved this son in the gospel, his " true child after a common faith," ^ but he was even more rejoiced at the news which he bore : " And not by his coming only, but also by the comfort wherewith he was comforted in you, while he told us your long- ing, your mourning, your zeal for me ; so that I re- joiced yet more." ^ The " longing " ^ was to see Paul * 2 Cor. vii. 5-16. ^ 2 Cor. vii. 6. ^ Call to one's side. 4 Titus i. 4. 5 2 Cor. vii. 7. ® Eager longing in the Greek. Cf. Phil. i. 8. 34 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY and it was music to his ears to hear a message like that from Corinth after all that had passed. Possibly Paul made Titus tell it over again ^ with all the de- tails, the names, what they said, etc. It was a charm- ing story to recount, as many a true pastor knows, especially after troubles have come. The " mourn- ing " 2 was due to the rebuke sent by Titus. As a result of the rebuke and the sorrow had come " zeal " ^ for Paul and the cause that Paul stood for. Paul had known that the sharp tone of the Epistle would wound many of them. It had cost him bitter tears ^ to write it. The pang of those sharp words that had to be spoken was part of Paul's misery. / Indeed, he had regretted ^ that he had written it, after it was gone and it was too late. But Paul's sorrow is turned into joy. " I now rejoice, not that ye were made sorry, but that ye were made sorry unto repentance." ^ The sorrow was of a godly ^ sort since it bore fruit in a change of mind and life. Hence Paul had really done them no harm. So Paul was comforted and it did his soul good to see " the joy of Titus,^ because his spirit hath been refreshed 1 Present participle, possibly repetition. 2Cf. Matt. ii. 1 8. 3 The same word has a bad sense in 2 Cor. xii. 20. 4 2 Cor. ii. 4. He wrote with " tightness of heart." 6 2 Cor. vii. 8. 6 2 Cor, vii. 9. Note the difference between " sorrow " and " re- pentance." ' According to God's standard. 8 2 Cor. vii. 13. THE NEW STANDPOINT 35 by you all." The word for " refreshed " * is the one used by Jesus in His gracious invitation to the weary and the heavy-laden : " I will give you rest." ^ Paul joys in the joy of Titus, the happiness of an old preacher in a young preacher who has accomplished a most difficult and dehcate task. Paul had not in- deed wholly given the cause up when he sent Titus and had gloried in some of them to him. He is glad now that his words are more than justified.^ So then Titus is in a tender mood towards the Corinthians and Paul's own " heart is enlarged " towards them. Indeed, " our mouth is open unto you, O Cor- inthians." ^ "I rejoice that in everything I am of good courage concerning you." ^ Heart and hope have come back to Paul about Corinth and so about all things. The word for " courage " is the same one used by Luke of Paul when the brethren from Rome, having heard of Paul's arrival, came to meet the party " as far as The Market of Appius and The Three Taverns ; whom when Paul saw, he thanked God, and took courage." ^ Few things are sweeter in life than human fellowship. The preacher's life is peculiarly rich in the love of the brethren. This is a large part of his reward. He comes close to the inner hfe of a man and rare Christian love knits heart 1 Rest again. 2 Matt, ii, 28. ^2 Cor. vii, 14 f. * 2 Cor. vii. II. 5 2 Cor. vii. 13. ^ Acts xxviii. 15. 36 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY to heart. For the moment Paul forgets that there is a stubborn minority left in the Church at Corinth who have resisted every appeal for conciliation. It was only the majority * that had come over to Paul and his view of things. But it was evidently such a strong majority that the Church is saved from schism and the obstinate faction can be handled. Paul will come to pay his respects to this minority led by his malignant enemies, the Judaizers, in the latter part of the Epistle.'* It is this double aspect of the report of Titus that explains the twofold char- acter of the Epistle. But we are not here concerned with Paul's treatment of this pugnacious element save to express the hope that they came over to his side before he came to Corinth. If they did not, they must have left, for Paul is master of the situa- tion in Acts XX. 2 f. Before leaving the discussion of Paul's situation in Philippi, it is interesting to note that Paul was happy once before when here, even though in prison.^ The Epistle to the Philippians, which he will write from Rome some years hence, is full of joy and commands to rejoice, though Paul at that time will again be a prisoner. But he is now no longer a prisoner in spirit. He is free as a bird as he shakes off the depression which had chained his spirit to the earth. We owe this matchless discus- es Cor. ii. 5 f. 22 Cor. x-xiii. 'Acts xvi. 25. THE NEW STANDPOINT 37 sion * of the Christian ministry to the very dejection of heart in Paul. The rebound was as high as the depression had been. The reaction was equal to the action. This digression, as already noted,^ is really quite distinct from the rest of the Epistle. It is, for all intents and purposes, a separate treatise on the glory of the Christian ministry. The brightness of this glory shines all the more brilliantly against the black cloud of doubt and disaster which im- mediately precedes this outburst of joy. The troubles in Paul's ministry were real, not merely imaginary. He was a manly man, if ever there was one. His difficulties are real still after he meets Titus, though greatly lessened. He has a new Hght on the problems at Corinth. That light flashes back over his life and forth into the future. He has a new sense of the relative values of things. Now he is in the right mood to estimate his own ministerial life and that of others. It is a great mistake for any preacher to reach a final conclusion in his moments of despondency. One can see better in the light than in the dark. The light will come if one press on towards it. The young man who is struggling with the sense of duty that calls him to be a preacher of the Gospel will be wise if he gives himself a chance to get this high view of the ministry as set * 2 Cor. ii. i2-vi. 10. * See beginning of this section. 38 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY forth by Paul in his moment of ecstasy. The highest is the truest as well as the best. The temptation is easy to settle the question of being a preacher on the dead-level of business, expediency, and con- venience. I do not believe that many young men will be led into the ministry by mathematical com- putations on the cost of living and the salary nor on the relations of modern thought to the Bible. No real " Sky-pilot " is ever found with that calculating spirit. It is the spiritual view of the eternal values as seen by Paul in this prophetic passage that will win and hold the noblest type of man to the service of Christ. Nothing else will really get its grip on him. Get into close grip with Christ, if He is tugging at your heart to put you into the ministry. If Christ puts you in, you will stay in and you will not be sorry, but count it your chief glory to have been counted worthy of that high dignity.' It is probably true that the ministry to-day does not stand as high relatively in the eyes of men as it once did. This may be due partly to the presence of some unworthy men in the ministry. There v^^as a J^das among the apostles. There have always been unworthy men in every calling. But it hurts more tn ^he ministry than anywhere else. But, after all, P&u\ does not here speak of the appeal that the ministry makes to *3Tim. i. 12. THE NEW STANDPOINT 39 the world. He gives God's view of the ministry. If one has that, nothing else really matters. " Let a man so account of us, as of ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God. . . . But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man's judgment . . . He that judgeth me is the Lord." ^ So Paul is going to sing a paean of praise for the ministry. Hear what he has to say of the appeal that this noblest of earth's vocations makes to him. What is it in the ministry that gripped and held a man so gifted as Paul ? 5. The New Interpretation of Paul's Ministry He has a new standpoint. The sun often shines on the mountain when it is dark in the valley. Paul is here sheer above the clouds. He can see far and near, up and down, in the clear empyrean. The obstacles that seemed so large in his path have now disappeared wholly from view or have assumed their true proportion in this fresh world-view. Let us stand upon the mountain with Paul and catch his view of the worth and dignity of service to Christ. Paul begins with the interpretation of his own ministry in view of the new light and outlook, but he soon widens his horizon to include the ministry as a calling and he treats it in its fundamental and 1 1 Cor. iv. 1-4. 40 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY eternal relations in a way to cheer every preacher's heart. (a) Triumph After All. But God's triumph, not Paul's. Paul is Christ's captive in God's triumphal march through the ages. God " always leadeth us in triumph in Christ." ' There is no doubt as to the meaning of this bold image. It does not mean " causeth us to triumph " as the King James' Version has it. No instance of this sense of the word has been found, and in Col. ii. 15 Paul uses it of Jesus " triumphing over them in it," His victory on the cross over the principalities and powers.^ " He is the captive who is led in the Conqueror's train, and in whom men see the trophy of the Conqueror's power." ^ It is the splendid image of a Roman triumphal pro- cession, and, though Paul had not seen one, he had yet heard of its glories.^ Distinguished captives were sometimes kept at Rome for years in order to grace the conqueror's procession when it took place. Thus JuHus Caesar held Vercingetorix, the famous chief in Gaul who came near plucking victory out of Caesar's hands, a prisoner in Rome for six years until his great triumph. Then he had him slain. So Claudius ^ 1 2 Cor. ii. 14. 2 For the examples in Greek literature see Bachmann, 2 Kor., S. 129. 3 Denney, " Expositor's Bible," 2 Corinthians, p. 87. 4 Bernard, " Expositor's Greek Testament," in loco, » Denney, p. 88. THE NEW STANDPOINT 4I triumphed over Caractacus. Paul may have had this very occasion in mind. But Paul's case is not quite parallel to that of Vercingetorix or Caractacus. ** When God wins a victory over man, and leads His captive in triumph, the captive too has an interest in what happens ; it is the beginning of all triumphs, in any true sense, for him." ' Even in Paul's tribula- tions and disappointments God has been victorious. It is easier to see the hand of God after we have passed through a crisis. Prof. David Smith, D. D., in a New Year's article in The British Weekly ^ pic- tures a captain looking one morning at the terrible crags on each side of the narrow pass through which the ship had passed in the storm at night into the harbour. " Did we — did we pass through in the dark- ness ? " he falteringly asked. God was using Paul for His glory in it all. Indeed, he dares say " always " now. What seemed to be defeat he now knows is victory. The good news brought by Titus has thrown an electric flashlight across the stormy billows and has revealed God — " Standeth God within the shadows Keeping watch above His own." The sense of the nearness of God in his own life and ministry is the overmastering conviction of Paul. He 1 Denney, p. 88. *Dec. 29, 1910. 42 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY probably means to include Timothy ' and Titus ^ in the " us." Indeed, he seems to have a vision of the whole long line of willing captives of God through the ages, past and present, who have been instruments in pushing on the work of the kingdom.^ If Paul is able to find joy in the midst of his misfortunes, he has pointed the way for every preacher of Christ. The secret lies in looking at one's life from God's stand- point. But this is only possible " in Christ." " Christ is the element in which that constant triumph of God takes place." ^ F. W. Robertson is right: " The de- feat of the true-hearted is victory." ^ It is the joy of full surrender to Christ that Paul here feels. He has cut loose from the entanglement of things of sense and has swung back to the old joy in Jesus. {b) The Incense Bearer. Plutarch ^ says that at the Roman triumph the temples were" full of fumiga- tions." ^ " Incense was burned before the victor's chariot."^ The transition is a very natural one, therefore, for Paul. He now thinks of himself, and all ministers of Christ, as incense bearers in God's march of victory. He ** maketh manifest through us ^ 2 Cor. i. I. 2 2 Cor. ii. 13 ; vii. 5 fF. 8 Meyer, 2 Corinthians, in loco. * Ibid. 6" Life and Letters and Addresses," p. 618. ''Aemil. Paul., C. 32. ' " Incense smoked on every altar as the victor passed through the streets of Rome." Denney, in loco. 8 Gould, American Comm., in loco. THE NEW STANDPOINT 43 the savour of His knowledge in every place." The " savour " and the " knowledge " are in opposition.* The knowledge of God in Christ is thus diffused like sweet perfume along the triumphal way of God. But the wonder of it is that the fragrance is spread " through us." This is due to no merit in the min- ister, but to the fact that he is near to God because he is in the procession so rich in the grace of God. But there is a sense of humble gratitude on Paul's part as he contemplates the great honour thus placed upon him and other preachers of the Gospel, that of spreading the knowledge of God along the way. Preaching ^ is the thing most immediately in Paul's mind, but he quickly turns the image round. ** For we are a sweet savour of Christ unto God." ^ He doubtless means that the incense bearer is so filled with the perfume that he himself is perfume. The preacher is so filled with Christ^ that he exhales Christ. The figure is common in the Old Testa- ment.^ The life of the true minister of Christ is thus redolent with that *• odour of sanctity " which refreshes the heart. But " the lowliest life which God is really leading in triumph will speak infallibly and persuasively for Him." ^ This is true of every follower * Genitive of apposition. * " In every place," also ; at Corinth as at Ephesus. '2 Cor. ii. 15. •* Meyer, in loco. •* Cf. Lev. i. 9, 13, etc. ® Denney, in loco. 44 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY of Jesus who bears witness to Christ in his hfe. It is usually true that men are responsive to the pervasive influence of holy living and clear testimony to Jesus. But it is not always true. The scribes and Pharisees found fault with John and with Jesus. Paul found it impossible to please all men, though he laboured to be " all things to all men, that I may by all means save some." ^ It had recently seemed to Paul that he was misunderstood on every hand. He now knows better. He still has plenty of enemies who are only too glad to turn any slip on his part to his hurt. Paul is careful "to cut off occasion from them that desire an occasion." ^ As I write these words, I am concerned about the complete misapprehension of the conduct of one of the noblest of ministers. One brother writes me that it is enough to make one lose faith in the ministry! This very brother who so writes is largely responsible for the conduct of the minister whom he so severely criticizes. But Paul has one supreme consolation that is open to us all. It is found in the words " unto God." It is a joy to God, whatever men think, when a life manifests Christ. That life is redolent to God of Christ. (c) The Peril of Preaching. The joy is mixed with sadness, for all are not saved. God is, however, glorified " in them that are saved, and in them that * I Cor. ix, 22. 2 2 Cor. xi. 12. THE NEW STANDPOINT 45 perish ; to the one a savour from death unto death ; to the other a savour of Hfe unto Hfe." ' Paul knew by sad experience the hardening effect of preaching that was resisted. Among those who were perishing ^ right before his eyes Paul and his ministry seemed like a " savour from death unto death." ^ The idiom is a bit obscure, but is like " from faith to faith." ^ This odour arises from death and causes death.^ The rabbis " called the Law an aroma vitcE to the good, but an aroma mortis to the evil." ^ The figure was thus one familiar to Paul in his old life. It is a sad thought to every faithful minister to know that men who hear his message will be hardened in sin by it because they reject it. But that is the inevitable penalty of human freedom. On the other hand, there is a bright side to the picture, for " in them that are saved " Paul is " a savour from hfe unto life." ^ There is progress out of life into more life. There is no joy comparable to that of witnessing the conversion of souls under one's own ministry. This was the joy of Jesus « and it is possible for us to have it. A ministry in which souls are not saved misses the chief joy of service. It is small wonder that, in view of the solemn responsibility of such a ministry, 1 2 Cor ii 15 f. - Present participle in the Greek. 8 Here not " sweet odour." ^ Rom. i. 17 ; cf. 2 Cor. iii. 18. 6 Meyer, in loco. ^ Bernard, in loco. ' Present participle in the Greek. « John iv. 32. 46 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY Paul asks : " And who is sufficient for these things ? " The Greek order is even more emphatic : "And for these things who is sufficient ? " He has sketched in the bold contrast of hfe and death " these things." The word " sufficient " means " fit " or " quahfied." Many a preacher has felt his utter inadequacy to meet such a situation. He has arrived, but he is not ready for his task. The stoutest heart may well sink be- fore the work of the modern minister. It is diffi- cult enough in the nature of the case, but people make all sorts of unreasonable demands of preachers. One can become a sort of packhorse for the com- munity's burdens and difficulties. The question of Paul seems rhetorical and to call for the answer that no one is sufficient for such a life as this fraught with such awful consequences for weal or woe.^ But Paul often surprises us by the bold turn of his thought. (d) Paul's Courage in Pre aching. He dares to say that he is " sufficient for these things " ! " For we are not as the many, corrupting the Word of God." He probably has in mind the Judaizers who did corrupt the Word of God. By " the many " Paul does not mean that the majority were like the Judaizers. They were many, as a matter of fact, but the majority held with Paul. Paul is not now under the juniper tree. He does not feel that he alone is * Bernard, in loco. THE NEW STANDPOINT 47 loyal to Christ. He is not bringing an indictment against the ministers of Christ as a class. He is ex- posing the hypocrites who had crept into the min- istry, as they still do, alas ! The word for " corrupt- ing " is used either for a retailer or a huckster. It comes to mean " adulterate," for the temptation was often yielded to then as now, to put the best apples on top of the barrel, the best strawberries on top of the basket. The Judaizers made a plausible plea and show. Paul, in contrast, grounds his confidence on two reasons. One is his sincerity. His berries are as good at the bottom as at the top. He is not afraid to face men with the gospel message, for it is sound to the core. He is not afraid that something will be found out to make him ashamed. He preaches a whole gospel with no mental reservations and a pure gospel with no flaws. In one of the visions of Ezekiel (viii. 7-13) there is a vivid picture of the betrayal of God by His ministers. Ezekiel saw a hole in the wall and he went through and found a door. He went in and he found " every form of creeping things, and abominable beasts, and all the idols of the house of Israel portrayed upon the wall round about. And there stood before them seventy men of the elders of the house of Israel." Then Jehovah said unto Ezekiel : " Son of man, hast thou seen what the elders of the house of Israel do in the 48 THE DISHEARTENED PREACHER'S JOY dark, every man in his chambers of imagery? for they say, Jehovah seeth us not ; Jehovah hath for- saken the land." Alas, and alas ! The other reason of Paul is that he bears God's commission. He did not appoint himself to this task. In fact, he vi^as seized in spite of himself and turned round when he was doing his utmost against Christ. *' As of God, in the sight of God, speak we in Christ." He multi- plies words and turns the idea over like a diamond. He looks at it from various sides. God is the source of his authority. He speaks with the eye of God on him. He speaks in the sphere of Christ. He never goes beyond Christ. He has not yet exhausted the riches of Christ. It is just " the unsearchable riches of Christ " that forever challenge him. « He can never tell that news often enough. He, less than the least of the saints, is not worthy to bear that story to the Gentiles. He is not sufficient of himself to face any one with this message, nor is any one sufficient in himself. *' But our sufficiency is from God ; who also made us sufficient as ministers of a new cove- nant; not of the letter, but of the spirit." God brought Paul and the rest into the ministry and equipped them for the service. " Such confidence have we through Christ to Godward." It is not self- complacency, but trust in God that fills Paul with holy courage to face a hostile and unbelieving world THE NEW STANDPOINT 49 with the story of redemption in Christ Jesus. The Corinthians ought not to misunderstand him. He is not praising himself. He needs no letter of in- troduction to them as ApoUos had, for instance, when he went to see them, or as the Judaizers may have claimed to have. His work in Corinth is an open letter to be read of all men. A letter of intro- duction is after all a very cold and lifeless thing. It implies that one is a stranger. But the Corinthians, with all their shortcomings, are written in Paul's very heart. The pastor who reads this bears witness to the truth of Paul's words as he calls up the faces of friends tried and true in this church or in that who have been bound to him with hooks of steel " in Christ." II THE GLORY THAT FADED— THE MODERN PROBLEM {2 Cor. ill. 6-16) ** Moses, who put a veil upon his face." — 2 Cor. in. ij. II THE GLORY THAT FADED— THE MODERN PROBLEM PAUL is reminded of the ministry of Moses as representative of the Old Covenant, probably because of the activity of the Judaizers in Corinth who claimed to be the exponents of Mosaism. It is thus an indirect polemic against the Jewish propagandists.' But it is more than mere alle- gorizing,^ a method that Paul knew how to use on oc- casion.^ But, in the present instance, Paul keeps close to the historical situation in Exodus xxiv.-xxxiv. and draws a wonderful parallel in the Judaism of his day. The whole system of Judaism is set in the boldest contrast to the ideal ministry of the New Covenant. This passage is worthy of the closest study by the preacher of to-day whose vision of the spiritual min- istry is beclouded by sacerdotalism and cere- monialism. It is pathetic to think that, in spite of Paul's bold and unanswerable exposure of the weak- ness of a mere sacerdotal ecclesiasticism, to-day in the Greek and Roman Churches are to be found just 1 Meyer, in loco, foot-note. 2 Bernard, in loco, 3 I Cor. X, 2 ; Gal. iv. 25. 53 54 THE GLORY THAT FADED the Jewish conception of the ministry which Paul is condemning. It is undoubtedly true also that the wide-spread influence of these two great Churches has in large measure shaped popular opinion of the min- ister as priest and cleric rather than as prophet, herald, servant, teacher, pastor. The downfall, the inevitable downfall, of this Jewish conception has brought un- told harm to the ministry per se. It is not easy for people to distinguish. The pinnacle upon which Paul places the preacher is not one of officialism in any sense. He is the man of high spiritual preroga- tive and privilege, not the man of ecclesiastical station. He is the man who looks in the face of God and comes to talk with the people as prophet, not as priest nor ecclesiastic. The problem before Paul is intensely modern in many of its phases. The ministry to-day has lost its glory for many people. There was once a halo about the calling of the min- ister which to some is now lost. It was once the dearest hope in every Scottish home, as in many others all over the world, that the boy would become a minister of Jesus Christ. Ian Maclaren has told with tender pathos how the cold blast of modern criticism has smitten this fair flower of faith in Bonnie Scotland.* Numerous modern novels seek to justify the modern denial of Jesus in its appeal to 1 « Beside the Bonnie Briar Bush." THE MODERN PROBLEM 55 the youth of to-day/ Paul graphically seizes upon the picture of Moses on Mount Sinai and uses it with powerful effect. I. A Real Glory Paul does not at all mean to deny the fact of the glory that belonged to Moses. The coming of the law was with glory ^ Indeed, the ministry of the Old Covenant was glory .^ " The glory of Jehovah abode upon Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it six days ; and the seventh day He called unto Moses out of the midst of the cloud." ^ These forty days and forty nights of communion with God left a mark of external radiance on the face of Moses. The divine glory was on the face of Moses. It is told with wonderful simplicity and power. "And it came to pass, when Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tables of the testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses knew not that the skin of his face shone by reason of his speaking with Him."^ The charm Hes in the unconsciousness of Moses. The "God of glory "« had appeared unto Abraham as He did to Stephen whose face shone like that of an angeF as he began to speak. It has sometimes happened that . Cf. " Robert Elsmere." » 2 Cor. iii. 7- ' ^ Cor. iii. 9- c Acts vii. 2 ; Gen. xii. I. ' Acts vi. 15 J vii. i f. 56 THE GLORY THAT FADED the modern minister comes to the pulpit from the throne of grace with the glory of God on his face. He is himself all unconscious of his heavenly radi- ance as he breaks the bread of life to the people. But they know it and thank God for the testimony in their hearts. " And when Aaron and all the chil- dren of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone ; and they were afraid to come nigh him." * They felt a solemn awe in his presence. They felt in truth the other Presence, the Presence of God in manifest power and glory. The rabbis had a fiction that this glory was from the hght of creation,^ but that is mere trifling. It was the ineffable glory in which Jehovah dwells that filled the countenance of Moses. It is the highest crown of the minister that he is called so often into the closest fellowship with the Eternal God. There is, of course, no special ministerial approach to the Throne of God, but his very work of itself draws him to communion with God. A preacher may not live up to his rich privi- lege, but it is there for him. There is no way to put on this radiant glory, no way but the " Practice of the Presence of God." Moses had actually been with God. He had to call Aaron and the rest to his side and they gradually drew nigh and listened ^ Ex. xxxiv. 30. » Meyer, in loco ; Eisenmenger, Entdeckt. Judenth., I., S. 369 f. THE MODERN PROBLEM 57 to his message from God.^ It is a moment of un- speakable responsibility when a man's soul is ablaze with the Word of God and his audience are - in tune with the infinite." Then the deepest mark is made upon the soul. There are mountain peaks in the experience of most men when the tongue is touched by the coal from the altar of God.- Then one is able to -cry" with power.^ It is at such supreme moments that souls are born into the king- dom, that men are called into the ministry. John A. Broadus had expected to be a physician and was studying towards that end, but he heard A. M. Poindexter preach one day on the - Parable of the Talents," and he could never get away from that sermon. It sent him into the ministry.^ It may be questioned if Dr. Poindexter ever performed a more useful service in his life than the preaching of this sermon. There is still glory and power in the min- istry under God. One way to enlist more men in the work of the ministry is to pray for more labourers as Jesus commanded.^ Another way is to live close to God and preach with the power and demonstra- tion of the Spirit. Paul gathered many young min- isters about him, like Timothy and Titus, who were a joy to his heart. But the man wins more men to 1 Ex xxxiv M f ' Isa. vi. 6 ff. ^ Isa. xl. 6. 4 Robertson, " Life and Letters of John A. Broadus," p. 52 f- 6 Matt. ix. 38 ; Luke x. 2. 58 THE GLORY THAT FADED the ministry who is unconscious of any special halo on his own head. He sees only the face of Jesus his Lord. Syria was once " the Cradle of the Prophets." * That is no longer the case, but it is an honour to a church or a land to be a " hot-bed for preachers." 2. A Hidden Glory " And when Moses had done speaking with them he put a veil on his face." ^ Paul interprets it thus : " so that the children of Israel could not look stead- fastly upon the face of Moses for the glory of his face." ^ They felt as if they were looking right at the sun and they could not stand the brilliant light. In- deed, the sun will put out the eyes of those who dare to gaze directly at his light for long. We resort to smoked glasses or take advantage of an eclipse to look steadfastly in the face of the sun. So Moses took the veil off only when he went in to speak with the Lord and put it on when he came out to speak with the people.^ There was a great gulf between the people and Moses. " Judaism had the one law- giver who beheld God while the people tarried below. Christianity leads us all to the mount of vision, and lets the lowliest pass through the fences, and go up where the blazing glory is seen. Moses veiled the * The Inter collegian f Jan., 1911, p. 86. 2 Ex. xxxiv. 33. ' 2 Cor, iii. 7. 4 Ex. xxxiv. 34 f. THE MODERN PROBLEM 59 face that shone with the irradiation of Deity. We with unveiled face are to shine among men." * Mac- laren^ is right also in saying that Paul's habit of " going off at a word," as illustrated in this passage about Moses and the veil, is not a mark of confusion, but '* of the fervid richness of the apostle's mind, which acquires force by motion, and, like a chariot- wheel, catches fire as it revolves." So, he continues, in this scene on the mount, " we have a picture of the Old Dispensation — a partial revelation, gleaming through a veil, flashing through symbols, expressed here in a rite, there in a type, there again in an ob- scure prophecy, but never or scarcely ever fronting the world with an unveiled face and the light of God shining clear from it. Christianity is, and Christian teachers ought to be, the opposite of all this. It has, and they are to have, no esoteric doctrines, no hints where plain speech is possible, no reserve, no use of symbols and ceremonies to overlay truth, but an in- telligible revelation in words and deeds, to men's understandings. It and they are plentifully to de- clare the thing as it is." Paul means to cast no reproach upon Moses or the Old Covenant by this contrast. The people simply could not stand the fullness of light which Moses had. Even if it was * Maclaren, " Expositions of Holy Scripture," 2 Corinthians, in loco, ^Ibid. 60 THE GLORY THAT FADED merely the skin of his face that shone with external glory, it was too bright for their eyes since they did not enjoy the inner light of Christianity. The charge is sometimes made to-day against the min- istry that it is the profession of obscurantists. Either modern ministers are dishonest in not being true to what they know and pander to the ignorance of the people or they have closed their minds to all light and progress. Both of these charges are freely made in some quarters and occasionally some colour is given to it by a minister whose defection is made a newspaper sensation. Notoriety always comes to the preacher who betrays his Lord or his gospel. As a result some young men are made to beheve that the ministry is an unworthy calling for a free man who does not wish to wear shackles. Hear Lord Morley, for instance, in his famous essay on Compro- mise : " These cases only show the essential and profound immorality of the priestly profession, which makes a man's living depend on his abstaining from using his mind, or concealing the conclusions to which the use of his mind has brought him. The time will come when society will look back on the doctrine that they that serve the altar shall live by the altar as a doctrine of barbarism and degradation." Lord Morley is an outspoken free-thinker and ag- nostic, and his indictment of the ministry can thus THE MODERN PROBLEM 6l be discounted. But the matter is taken very seri- ously by Rev. Canon Danks/ of the Church of Eng- land, who calls them "words of very serious import to men who have entered or who wish to enter the min- istry." He says : " They express the thought which, more than any other cause, deters able candidates for ordination. Nor has their force been lessened by the lapse of time, for the gap between the critics and the popular theology is wider now than thirty- five years ago. . . . There is a greater gulf be- tween the theological student and the untaught believer or unbeliever than ever before." It is evi- dent that such a situation exists in many quarters and the wide-spread decrease in the number of stu- dents for the ministry, once so serious and now happily disappearing, may be partly due to this cause. Dr. Danks has probably somewhat exag- gerated its influence, but it is a real problem. He replies in behalf of the Church of England : " Were Hooker and Butler emissaries of intellectual dark- ness, slaves themselves and enslaving others ? Were Thirlwall, Lightfoot, Westcott, Creighton, Robert- son of Brighton, Maurice, Kingsley, Stanley, Jowett — were all these obscurantists, stunting the mental growth of their time ? On the contrary, they were 1 Article, " The Clergy, Conscience, and Free Inquiry," The Hibbert Journal^ Jan., 191 1. 62 THE GLORY THAT FADED among the most alert, profound, and free intelli- gences of their time, teaching and emancipating their own and succeeding generations. Nor is there, so far as I know, any reason to suppose that they were in the least conscious of thinking in fetters, or acting a part." This is a pertinent reply. Indeed, the fault found to-day with many men in the ministry is not that they are " hidebound reactionaries," but that they are entirely too advanced and radical. But their very presence and work constitute an answer to Lord IMorley's charge. Moses was at first uncon- scious of the glory on his face, but the conduct of the people made him aware of the radiance. It was not acting a part to hide his face with the veil. He delivered his message with covered face. It is no deception for the minister to-day to keep his inmost self to himself. He does not claim omniscience. If new light is coming, more may come. Modesty is becoming to the herald of the Cross. He is not called upon to parade his doubts nor all the hidden ecstasies of his life with God. He must be wiUing to wait and learn like other men. One should preach his beliefs, not his doubts. But, when a real breach has come between him and Christ, he is not called upon to act the hypocrite and to go on mumbling phrases and words that have no meaning to him. The door is still open for him to go out of the minis- THE MODERN PROBLEM 63 try of Christ when there is no freedom within it. He must be his own judge when to keep still on less important matters and when to speak his mind on vital issues. But there is never reason for whimper- ings on the limitations of the ministry ; never, unless one is in the grip of a priestly hierarchy. Then, much of what Lord Morley says is true. There is to-day a movement in the Roman Catholic Church called " Modernism." It has aroused the wrath of Pope Pius X to such an extent that he has turned the whole power of the Vatican to its destruction.' The outcome no one can tell, but " what we can fore- see is this, that it will be one of the most momentous crises recorded in history." ^ it is chiefly because Romanism has sought to put clamps upon the human spirit, as the later Judaism of Paul's day did, that this crisis has come. Protestantism stands out against medieval Romanism as Paul's interpretation of a free Christianity rises above the fettered Judaism of his time which he once proclaimed and sought to force upon the Christians themselves. A group of Roman CathoHc priests in Italy have addressed a 1 He has issued a Syllabus, two Encyclicals (1907, 1909), and in September, 19 10, used the Motu propria to compel every pro- fessor, every new confessor, priest, and canon to take the oath of orthodoxy. 2 Prof, Giovanni Luzzi, D. D., Florence, in the January, 191 1, Hibbert Journal, article, " The Roman Catholic Church in Italy at the Present Hour." 64 1HE GLORY THAT FADED letter to Pius X entitled " What zue zvaiit," * in which they say : " Our society has now for many years held entirely aloof from the Church, which it con- siders as an ancient and inexorable foe. . . . The Church is considered an obstacle to the happi- ness of nations ; the priest is insulted in public as a common, ignorant parasite; the Gospel and Chris- tianity are regarded as expressions of a decayed civilization, because they are entirely insufficient to answer to the ideals of freedom, justice, and science which are shaking the masses." This portrayal does not come from Lord Morley, but is the despairing cry of Roman Catholic priests about Romanism. The trouble is just here that men do not always dis- tinguish between priest and preacher. Paul is not in his noble panegyric on the ministry calling men to the decayed Judaism nor to the corrupt and cor- rupting Romanism of the future, but to the glorious Gospel of the Son of God which is not bound.^ Men could bind Paul, but not the gospel of the kingdom. He was bound in the spirit with allegiance to Christ, but had no fear of man.^ Jesus had said that the truth would make men free. It was God's purpose to give the world a message which would be 1 Quel che vogliano. Quoted by Professor Luzzi in the Hibbert Journal article. » 2 Tim. ii. 9. » Acts xx. 23. THE MODERN PROBLEM 65 delivered boldly and openly without any veil upon the face. " Having therefore such a hope, we use great boldness of speech, and are not as Moses, who put a veil upon his face." ^ The word " boldness " means ** telling it all." ^ Paul glories in his freedom as a minister of Christ. God has come in Christ and the Light has been tempered to the eye of man. 3. A Temporary Glory Paul expressly calls attention to the transient aspect of the glory on the face of Moses as a symbol of the passing glory of the Mosaic ministry and so of Judaism — " Moses, who put a veil upon his face, that the children of Israel should not look steadfastly on the end of that which was passing away."^ So in verse seven he says : '* Which glory was passing away." Meyer ^ takes Paul's language to mean that Moses practiced " dissembling " with the people since he did not wish the people to see the glory on his face die away, else they would lose respect for him and his work. However, he does not think that Paul regarded this act as immoral on the part of Moses. Paul is not in verse thirteen denying what he said in verse seven about the hght being too bril- I2 Cor. iii. 12. 'Cf. John vii. 13 where it is translated " openly." ® 2 Cor. iii. 13. * /« loco^ 66 THE GLORY THAT FADED liant for the people to look upon.* The language in verse thirteen undoubtedly presents a purpose to prevent the people of Israel from seeing the de- parture of the glory on the countenance of Moses.^ Some have even supposed that Christ is meant by " the end of that which was passing away." ^ But that is quite beside the mark. There is no direct statement in Exodus concerning this second point made by Paul, though the transient nature of the glory on the face of Moses is plain in the context. It is clear in the consciousness of Moses since he kept^ putting the veil on and off. But one is going far beyond Paul's remarks on the story in Exodus to accuse Moses of dissembling. He probably first put the veil on because the brightness he found " was so resplendent as to dazzle the beholders."^ Then he realized that, when he did speak to the people with- out the veil, the people would note that the glory was no longer on his countenance. How long he kept up that plan is not made plain, but the day came, probably soon, when he had to speak without the 1 Bernard, in loco, notes that in Ex. xxxiv. 33 " till " in the Authorized Version has been changed to " when " in the Revised Version. But, even so, that does not affect the two points made by Paul. 2 " That " is design, not result. 8 Cf. Rom. X. 4. * 2 Cor. iii, 13. 5 Denny, 2 Corinthians, in loco. For a discussion of the interpre- tation of the Targums, the Septuagint, and Philo, see Bachmann, Der Zweite Brief des Faulus an die Korinther, S. 156 THE MODERN PROBLEM 67 veil. What Moses avoided was the people seeing the glory slowly vanish away each time. There is a real parallel here in the experience of every minister when he has spoken with power concerning the things of God. In the pulpit he has seemed like one inspired. When he steps down among the people, there is need of caution lest a violent nervous re- action may dissipate at once the real spiritual im- pression produced. A story is told about a famous preacher to the effect that, when he was in the pulpit, the church wished he would never leave it ; but, when he was out of it, they wished that he would never enter it. The only way to have permanent glory is to continue beholding the glory of the Lord. If we cease looking at Him, we cease to reflect His glory. Moses may not have thought at all (almost certainly did not) of his conduct being a type of the temporary nature of his ministry, nor was he think- ing of the difference between what he was and what he had to teach.' A preacher is often tempted to hide his own person and weaknesses out of sight in order to concentrate attention on what he is saying. To a certain extent this is justifiable, but people will not allow a clear divorce between preaching and practice on the part of the minister. " Moses had a momentary gleam, a transient brightness ; we have a ^ Cf. Meyer, in loco. 68 THE GLORY THAT FADED perpetual light. Moses' face shone, but the lustre was but skin deep. But the light that we have is inward, and works transformation into its own like- ness." * There is a finality in the revelation of the Gospel which is not true of Judaism. " The true greatness of God is revealed, and with it His true glory, once for all, in the Gospel." ^ Paul exults in this surpassing difference : ** For if that which passeth away was with glory, much more that which re- maineth is in glory." ^ Paul boldly champions the permanence of the glory and service in Christ. The New Testament ministry will continue because there is no higher word for the redemption of man than the Gospel of Christ. Jesus is the fullness of God's message to man. We shall continue to get new light on that message, but shall never get beyond it.^ The demand for ministers of the Gospel to-day is just the same as it was in the first century. Nor has preach- ing lost its power over the hearts of men. That is a cry that comes in each generation. Human life takes on new phases. The printing press brings the newspaper, the magazine, and the novel. The tele- phone, the automobile, the electric car revolution- ize the habits of men. But no printed page can per- ^ Maclaren, « Expositions of Holy Scripture," in loco. ' Denney, in loco. 3 2 Cor. iii. II. * Works like G. B. Foster's " Finality of the Christian Religion are mere passing leaves. THE MODERN PROBLEM 69 manently supply the place of the man who has looked into the face of God and now looks into the face of sinful men and presses home with burning words the sense of sin and the redemption in Jesus Christ. The minister who does this has a great hearing to-day and will always be greeted by glad hearts. This is the eternal call for preachers, the heart-hunger^ of sinful men for the knowledge of God in Christ, for the unveihng of their real selves, for the touch of heart upon heart, for the mighty moving of the Spirit of God. The greatest spirits of all time have responded to this call of God and will continue to do so. A Protestant scholasticism,^ a Roman Catholic hierarchy, a Jewish scribism may lose the gift of spiritual insight, of human sympathy, of power to speak for God. But even so God is not bound to this system or to that. He will find men who can hear His voice and see His face.^ 4. A71 Overshadowed Glory The glory on the face of Moses passed away, but there was a real glory in the Old Covenant. There was and there still is. It is an argument at first from the less to the greater. " If the ministration of death » Cf. Stalker, « The Preacher and His Models," p, 25 f. ' Denney, in loco. 3 Commenting on the coming of the Rev. J. H. Jowett from Birmingham to New York, The British Weekly, Jan. 26, 1 891, speaks of " The Call for Preachers " and quotes from a saying of 70 THE GLORY THAT FADED . . . came with glory, how shall not rather the ministration of the spirit be with glory ? " ' The condition admits the glory of the Old Dispensation and by a rhetorical question argues the greater glory of the New Dispensation. " For if the ministration of condemnation hath glory, much rather doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory." * Paul admits the glory of the Old, but claims the much richer glory of the New. In itself this is no dis- paragement of the true Judaism. " For if that which passeth away was with glory, much more that which remaineth is in glory." ^ Three times Paul has thus used the argument from the less to the greater. It is a self-evident proposition. But, in truth, there is such an overplus ^ of glory in the New Covenant that the glory of the Old seems to disappear entirely ; the greater glory dims the less. " For verily that which hath been made glorious hath not been made glorious in this respect, by reason of the glory that surpass- eth." ^ In one point at least the old seems to have no glory at all, because of the superabundant glory of the New Covenant.^ " The veiled Moses represents Martin Luther in Dr. Kawerau's tribute to Spurgeon : *' In the Church it is not enough that books should be written and read, but it is necessary that there should be speaking and hearing. There- fore Christ wrote nothing, but spoke everything. The apostles wrote little, but spoke a great deal." ^ 2 Cor. iii. 7 f . ^ 2 Cor. iii. 9. » 2 Cor. iii. il. * 2 Cor. iii. 9. 62 Cor. iii. 10. ^ 2 Cor. iii. 10. THE MODERN PROBLEM 7 1 the clouded revelation of old. The vanishing gleam on his face recalls the fading glories of that which was abolished." * " The stars are bright till the moon rises; the moon herself reigns in heaven till her splendour pales before the sun; but when the sun shines in his strength, there is no other glory in the sky. All the glories of the Old Covenant have van- ished for Paul in the light which shines from the Cross and from the Throne of Christ." ^ Paul had already caught the vision of the conquest of Christi- anity and of the vanishing of Judaism by comparison. The Jews still linger in the world as a witness of God's Word till the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.^ Israel Zangwill ^ even now laments : *' What threat- ens the existence of the race is the decay of Juda- ism." But with Paul there is no rivalry, so far does Christianity outdistance Judaism. There was no rivalry between John the Baptist and Jesus because John saw clearly that his light was to fade before that of Jesus : " He must increase, but I must de- crease." ^ John was the herald of the dawn as the sun arose. The true Judaism finds its fulfillment in Christ.^ Sometimes a preacher is sorely tested when he sees another minister go far beyond him in use- * Maclaren, <' Expositions," in loco. 2 Denney, in loco. ' Luke xxi. 24 ; Rom. xi. 25. 4 77^-? Jezuish Review^ Jan., 1911, p. 391. * John iii. 30. ^ Rom. x. 4. 72 THE GLORY THAT FADED fulness and popular favour. His light is dimmed by that of a greater personality. Happy is he if he can rejoice in the greater light, " that he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together." ' An old minister will do well to watch his spirit and to find joy in the young ministers about him. God will keep our going out into activity and our coming in to the inner shrine.^ *' In that inner room of life there sits Regret with her pale face, and Shame with dust on her forehead, and Memory with tears in her eyes. It is a pitiable thing sometimes, this coming in. More than one man has consumed his life in a flame of activity because he could not abide the coming in. But, * The Lord shall keep thy com- ing in ' — that means help for every lonely, impotent, inward hour of life." ^ But Paul stands in the full glory of Christianity with naught to conceal. He is not afraid that people will find out something about the Gospel. ** St. Paul has painted his own portrait at full length, and in every line of it is the portrait of the minister. There is more in his writings which touches the very quick of our life as ministers than in all other writings in existence." ^ Paul speaks out of his heart for the Christian ministry of all ages » John iv. 36. « Cf. Psalm cxxi. 8. » Percy C. Ainsworth, " The Threshold Grace." * Stalker, « The Preacher and His Models," p. 18. THE MODERN PROBLEM 73 when he exalts Christianity above Judaism and all other religions in the world and places the Christian ministry at the summit of life's callings. Nothing can ever overshadow the true glory of the ministry of Jesus Christ. " If the pulpit has an authentic message to deliver about Him whose thought is the ground of all existence, and whose will of love is the explanation of the pain and mystery of life, the more cultivated and eager the mind of man becomes, then the more indispensable will the voice of the pulpit be felt to be; and a real decay of the power of the pulpit can only be due either to preachers themselves, when, losing touch with the mysteries of revelation, they let themselves down to the level of vendors of passing opinion, or to such a shallowing of the general mind as will render it incapable of taking an earnest interest in the profounder problems of exist- ence." 5. A Defective Glory At its best the Old Covenant had drawbacks of a serious nature in spite of its real glory. It is a min- istry of the " letter " as opposed to ** spirit." God " made us sufficient as ministers of a new covenant ; not of the letter, but of the spirit : for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." "^ It is not entirely ^ Stalker, " The Preacher and His Models," p. 27. » 2 Cor. iii. 6. 74 THE GLORY THAT FADED clear what Paul means by these words. Meyer' takes it to mean " the reaso7t why God hath made them capable of ministering not to the letter, but to the spirit." Certainly the scribes had made the law a matter of letter and form, not of spiritual life and power. But it is probable that Paul is making a more serious charge than the patent misuse of the law current among the rabbis. In Romans vii. 6 he speaks of serving " in newness of the spirit, and not in oldness of the letter," ^ as in Romans ii. 29 he de- scribes the " Jew who is one inwardly ; and circum- cision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter." He does not mean a contrast between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. The con- trast is drawn between the law as letter and the re- deemed spirit in man.^ The spirituaUife is strangled by literalism, but it is not the point aimed at here by Paul.^ The law is meant by " letter " and works death. We are under the curse of the law when we seek to be saved by the law.^ Christ has redeemed us from under the curse of the law,^ having become a curse for us. The Spirit of Christ makes alive our spirits held in the grip of the law which was death. The law, then, kills,^ while the Spirit quickens.^ > In loco. ' Cf. Rom. vi. 4. ^ Bernard, in loco. 4 Denney, in loco. ^ Gal. iii. 10. « Gal. iii. 13. ' Cf. Rom. vii. 7-24. » Cf. Rom. vii. 25-viii. 11. THE MODERN PROBLEM 75 ** When the apostle has written these two Httle sen- tences — when he has supplied * letter ' and ' spirit * with ' kill ' and * make alive,' in the sense which they bear in the Christian revelation — he has gone as far as the mind of man can go in stating an effective contrast." But Paul turns the idea over a few times. He plainly mentions " the ministration of death, written, ajid engraved on stones " in contrast with ** the ministration of the spirit." ' Paul takes up the word " letter " and applies ^ it to the tables of law brought down by Moses on Mount Sinai. The tra- dition in Philo ^ was that the words were graven on stone, though the narrative in Exodus ^ does not say so. Paul had felt the death-chill of the law in his own life, though the law was good in itself, yet it only brought a keener consciousness of sin.^ The Old Covenant had merely a " ministration of con- demnation " in contrast with " the ministration of righteousness." ^ Paul insists that righteousness is not of the law, but of faith.^ Satan poses as an an- gel of light and puts forward his ministers as " min- isters of righteousness." ^ But the thunders of Sinai brought only the voice of condemnation. It is all " thou shalt " and " thou shalt not." There is a * 2 Cor. iii. 7 f . ^2 Cor. lii. 7. ' Vita Mos, iii. 2. *Ex. xxxiv. 29. 5 Rom. v. 20 f. ; vii, 7-12. *2 Cor. iii. 9. 'Gal. iii. 21. ^2 Cor. xi. 15. 76 THE GLORY THAT FADED majesty more transcendent about the New Dispensa- tion/ but the dominant note is grace, not law. The ministers of the New Covenant have hope and cer- tainty. They bear a message of cheer, not of mere condemnation. It is still a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the Hving God after having trodden under foot the Son of God and having done despite unto the Spirit of His grace, more terrible than it was under the Mosaic dispensation.^ But the minis- ter of Christ is not a mere denouncer of evil, though he has to cry aloud and spare not like the prophets of old. He is the herald of the Gospel, the bearer of pardon to sinners who will respond to the grace of God. This is the greatest difference between the ministers of the Old Covenant and those of the New. " How beautiful are the feet of them that bring glad tidings of good things ! " ^ Paul knew this to be true in a sense not understood by Isaiah.^ It is sad to see a minister of Christ who is still at Sinai, who is still under the Old Covenant, who is still proclaim- ing the message of death, who has not caught the vision of love and grace and hope in the New Cove- nant. Paul's appeal is for men who will carry the message of the Cross, not of Sinai. Paul sees in Jesus the emancipation of the human spirit from the ^ Heb. ii. 1-4 ; xii. 25-29. 2 Heb. x. 26-31. 8 Rom. X. 15. 4 Isa. lii. 7 ; cf. Nahum i. 15. THE MODERN PROBLEM 77 bondage of the law. The chill of mere formalism had frozen the life out of Judaism as it has destroyed the real power of many expressions of Christianity. There is to-day the same peril in sacerdotahsm that Paul feared in Judaism. The emptiness of mere negative rules was abhorrent to his free spirit. He had known by bitter experience the dry-rot of mere religiosity and sanctimoniousness. Professional sanctity was repellent to Paul's nature. He saw in the Christian ministry the exponents of God's love and of personal piety. No greater peril confronts the minister to-day than the one Paul found in the Judaism of his day. The prophet disappeared in the priest. The priest dried up in the scribe. The scribe split hairs over what prophet and priest had meant. Traditional interpretation took the place of vital experience of God. Love of the external killed the inner life and crucified Jesus of Nazareth for His emphasis on the spiritual life and rebuke of the mere ceremonialism of the scribes and Pharisees. Stephen went the way of Jesus when he rebuked the Pharisees for their perversion of real religion and sought to give the spiritual interpretation of the kingdom of God as expounded by Jesus. Paul turned from persecut- ing Pharisee to spiritual interpreter of Jesus and took the place of Stephen in whose death he had re- joiced. Jesus and Stephen fought official Pharisaism 78 THE GLORY THAT FADED in the current Judaism. Paul took up the battle with Pharisaism within the Christian fold which was seeking to put the fetters of their perverted Judaism upon the Christianity of Jesus. The one hope of rescue for the soul of man was in jeopardy. Paul's soul was stirred to its depths and he met the issue with all the force of his nature. He is in the thick of the fight with these Judaizing Christians, who were attempting to destroy spiritual Christianity, when he draws the contrast here between Judaism and Christianity. The battle between the bondage of legalism and spiritual Christianity has never ceased. Paul set up his standard in 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Romans. Luther took it up hundreds of years afterwards. The peril is always real. The very difficulties of the struggle challenge great spirits to enter the lists. The evident perversions of Chris- tianity and failure of some ministers to be apostles of freedom in Christ should not repel the best spirits of our time. They should the rather hear the call to fight for the soul of man against all who seek to bind him whether king or priest, state or church, traditionahst or innovationist. The minister will need to keep himself close to God if he is to fight against the mighty forces of reaction and radicalism. Paul had to beat off the Judaizers with their narrow- ness on the one hand and the Gnostics with their THE MODERN PROBLEM 79 false liberality and philosophic looseness on the other. The preacher of Christ to-day needs constant re- newal of his spiritual life to avoid this empty profes- sionalism into which Judaism had sunk. '' Valuable as an initial call may be, it will not do to trade too long on such a memory. A ministry of growing power must be one of growing experience. The soul must be in touch with God and enjoy golden hours of fresh revelation. The truth must come to the minister as the satisfaction of his own needs and the answer to his perplexities." ' Religiosity is not religion. 6. An Ineffective Glory The saddest thing about the history of the Old Covenant was its failure to work the spiritual renewal of the people. The story of Israel till the Captivity is that of desertion of God. The people kept going after the idols of the nations around them in spite of prophets like Samuel, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Jere- miah. After the Restoration the Jews stuck to the letter of the law and missed God again. Hear Paul ^ again : '• But their minds were hardened ; for until this very day at the reading of the Old Covenant the same veil remaineth, it not being revealed to them » Stalker, " The Preacher and His Models," p. 53. *2 Cor. iii. 14 f. 8o THE GLORY THAT FADED that it is done away in Christ. But unto this day, whensoever Moses is read, a veil heth upon the heart." Moses hved to see the bhndness of his peo- ple : " But Jehovah hath not given you a heart to know, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day." * Indeed, at Sinai Moses knew when he cried : " Oh, this people have sinned a great sin and have made them gods of gold."^ But even so Moses loved his people so much that he wished to be blotted out of God's book if God could not forgive them.^ So Paul felt about the Jews : " I could wish that I myself were anathema from Christ for my brethren's sake, my kinsmen according to the flesh."* But Paul knew only too well the tragedy^ of Judaism, how Jesus came unto His own and His own received Him not.^ He had himself tried to lift the veil that rested on the heart of the Jews, but had found it very hard to do.^ They had thrust the Gospel from them and compelled Paul to turn to the Gentiles. Paul knew how bitter it was to preach to an unresponsive audience, whose thoughts were hardened ^ like tough gristle or leather. The veil on the face of Moses had its analogue in a veil on the heart of the people. He had to hide the glory on his face from them and they * Deut. xxix. 4. *Ex. xxxii. 31. 'Ex. xxxii. 32. 4 Rom. ix. 3. « Cf. Conder, " The Hebrew Tragedy." •John i. II. 'Cf. Acts xiii. 44 ff.; xvii. 5; xviii. 14, etc. s 2 Cor. iii. 14. THE MODERN PROBLEM 8 1 became unable to see the glory after the other veil was gone. The message of Moses is written in the Old Covenant * (Testament), but the people have no eyes to see. The eyes of their heart ^ have not been en- lightened that they may know the " riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints." ** But as to Israel he saith, All the day long did I spread out my hands to a disobedient and gainsaying people."^ Paul found hope in the fact that the Gentiles will hear.^ Good may come in the end to the Jews who remain.* But, meanwhile, the Jews still have the veil on their hearts. Some of them are beginning to see some beauty in Jesus.^ Others ^ resent this Jew- ish liberalism as treason to Moses. The breach be- tween the current Judaism and Christianity still exists. But, that is not all. Some ministers find a wider breach between the currents of modern life and the message of Christ. Some, alas, find that the Gospel of Christ no longer charms their own souls, that they have an unresponsive people whose hearts are dead to the spiritual appeal, who are slaves to mammon and greed and who do not love God nor fear man. The light has gone out and the glory has faded from the hills. God pity that preacher and 1 Cf. Heb. ix. i6 f. 2 Eph. i. 18. » Rom. x. 21. * Acts xxviii, 28. 5 Rom. xi. * Cf. Montefiore, " The Religious Teaching of Jesus " (1910). ' Cf. The Jewish Review y October, 19 10. 82 THE GLORY THAT FADED turn his face towards Jesus. " But whensoever it [the heart] shall turn to the Lord, the veil is taken away." * By " Lord " Paul means the Lord Jesus. Christ can hft the veil of spiritual ignorance and indifference from the heart of Jew and Gentile, preacher and people. No one else can do that. What the world to-day needs is the look at Christ, the look of trust with the heart, the turning from Moses and rabbi, from mammon and self, from pride of philosophy and self-righteousness, to the Light that is in the Face of Christ. There and there alone will be found spiritual rejuvenation. 1 2 Cor. iii. 1 6. Ill THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS- THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST (2 Cor. iv. 4-6) The light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." — 2 Cor. iv. o. Ill THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS-THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST I. The Face of Jesus Christ PAUL did not probably know Jesus in the flesh. He once knew Him " after the flesh," ^ but that expression almost certainly means that he once looked upon Christ as men of the world still do. He had once hated and persecuted Jesus. It is sometimes objected that Paul discounted the earthly life of Jesus. " He tells us in several places, more especially in the opening chapters of Galatians, that he does not regard the searching out of historic evidence as of any importance." ^ That is surely reading much into Paul. Hear Professor Gardner again : " Within a generation of the Cruci- fixion we find St. Paul placing the human life of his Master between two periods of celestial exaltation. That was the beginning of Christology." Paul did do that, but so did John's GospeP and Epistles^ and 2 Percy Gardner, in « Jesus or Christ " {Hibbert Journal Supple^ ment for 1909), p. 48. * John i. 1-4 ; cf. " The Face of Jesus," by David Smith. 85 86 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS the Synoptic Gospels and Acts.' It is true that Paul cared more about the right interpretation of Jesus and the proper attitude towards Him than he did about the mere historical events of the earthly- life of Jesus. But a careful study of Paul's Epistles and his addresses in Acts will show that he knew all the crucial points of that life. Many of these were matters of public knowledge which Paul would have learned during his leadership of the persecution of the Christians in Jerusalem. After his conversion Paul had fifteen days in Jerusalem with Simon Peter right in the midst of the closing scenes of Christ's life.2 " No one has the right to say that Saul had no knowledge of the historical Jesus. If Luke could learn, so could Paul. Sanday ^ rightly argues that the allusions in Paul's Epistles (cf. i Cor. xi. 23-25 ; XV. 3-8) must be regarded as samples of Paul's knowledge of the details of the life of Jesus. He appeals to the words of Jesus ; he understands the character of Jesus ; he knows what the message and mission of Jesus is." ^ The qualifications of Paul as an interpreter of Jesus challenge us at once in the verses ^ before us. I venture to say that he is the 1 Cf. Warfield, « The Lord of Glory," for a full development of this argument. 2 Gal. i. 18. 3 Art. " Paul " in Hastings's D. C. G. * Robertson, " Epochs in the Life of Paul," p. 89. ^ 2 Cor. iv. 4-6. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 87 supreme interpreter of Jesus Christ, he and John the Apostle. It is true that Paul's spiritual eyes had been blinded before the great light shone around him that day on the road to Damascus.* That light blinded the eyes of his body, but opened the eyes of his soul. " I could not see for the glory of that light." Yes, but he had seen the glory in the face of Jesus. " When his eyes were opened, he saw nothing " ^ but Jesus. That voice and that face fol- lowed him through life. In Damascus the scales fell from his eyes and the Holy Spirit came upon him and he was baptized, but he had already seen Jesus in the way.^ That was his unbroken testimony that he had seen the Lord Jesus on the way to Damascus.^ " I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision."^ That transcendent experience was the crux upon which all of Paul's testimony turned. He never doubted its reality for one moment. Many persons had looked on the face of Jesus while in the flesh who did not understand Him. There was be- yond doubt a wondrous fascination in the face of Jesus that no artist has succeeded in putting upon canvas. The pictures of Christ are either too effemi- nate or too crude.^ No face has ever so haunted and 1 Acts ix. 3 ; xxii. 6 ; xxvi, 13. ' Acts ix. 8. ^ Acts ix. 17 f. ^ Acts ix. 27 ; I Cor. xv. 8. ^ Acts xxvi. 19. 6 Cf. Tissot, " The Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ " (1900), which is well done as a whole. See also " The Christ Face in Art." 88 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS baffled the greatest artists. This face was really hu- man, but free from the taint of sin and disease. No spectres of the past looked through those eyes. No shadows of forbidden secrets flitted past. Pity, un- utterable compassion, looked out of the depths of purity and unsullied strength. Untarnished truth looked out on a world of lies. The noblest impulses of man met the shock of hate and envy. The clear light of heaven's love gazed longingly at the suffering and the sinning. Those eyes could flash with ter- rific power upon hypocrites who used the livery of heaven to serve the devil in. Before His wrath men slunk away like cowed beasts, guilty and condemned. But the penitent and the contrite saw a new hope as they looked in the face of Jesus. There were some who could never forget the thrill of joy which came to their hearts as they gazed into His face. At moments they could be amazed at the struggling emotions in His countenance. There were three who beheld His majestic glory on the mount. But not all men could see all this in the face of Jesus. The rabbis were angered to desperation as they saw that calm and powerful face. Its very innocence en- raged them. But Paul was a man gifted above his fellows. When once he did see Jesus Christ, he was in a position to see more than many other less gifted spirits. His soul was keyed to the highest tension THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 89 as he looked into the face of Jesus. In his after study of that face he had the skill of a supreme artist. He never ceased looking. At first Paul had studied the picture of Jesus that he might see the secret of His power. " But, as he looked, there hap- pened a strange thing — the picture crept into his soul. He had sought to find the secret of its power with the view of refuting it. He did find the secret of its power ; but it refuted him. The gaze of anger was transmuted into a gaze of rapture." * Matheson calls Paul " the Illuminated " and it aptly describes the qualifications of Paul for his interpretation of Christ. " Remember, the Christ whom Paul first saw was the Christ in heaven. He never gazed upon the Man of Galilee. His earliest vision was the vision of a Jesus glorified. Not on the road to the Cross did Christ meet him ; He came to him panoplied in heavenly splendour. What his inner eye beheld was the Christ of the future — a Christ of majesty, a Christ of power, a Christ who came clothed in the lightning and wreathed in the conqueror's robe. That was the first Christian image in Paul's soul. Is it wonderful that it should have been the first Christian image in his writings ? " ^ The famous blind preacher has seen into the secret of Paul's soul.^ It is interesting how » Matheson, "Representative Men of the New Testament," p. 335. 2 Ibid., p. 343. *Cf. also Matheson, " Spiritual Development of St. Paul." 90 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS fond Matheson was of pictures that he carried in his memory from the days before he lost his eyesight. He has seen with the eye of the soul more than many who had the sight of the eye/ Moses had once asked to look upon the glory of God. '• Show me, I pray thee, Thy glory. . . . And He said, thou canst not see My face ; for man shall not see Me and live. And Jehovah said. Behold there is a place by Me, and thou shalt stand upon the rock, and it shall come to pass, while My glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a cleft of the rock, and will cover thee with My hand until I have passed by : and I will take away My hand, and thou shalt see My back ; but My face shall not be seen." ^ This is anthropomorphic, to be sure, but it marks the differ- ence between the Old Covenant and the New. It is poetic imagery when Moses said : " For Thou, Je- hovah, art seen face to face,"^ though a great spir- itual reality. God did manifest Himself in wonderful measure to Moses, but not as Paul saw God in the face of Christ. The Greek word for " face " '' has also the idea of " person " as in 2 Corinthians i. 1 1 ; viii. 24. Paul several times speaks of the face of Christ.*^ It was more than a mere image to Paul, but he longed ^ Cf. Matheson, *« Studies of the Portrait of Christ." Two vol- umes. 2 Ex. XXX wi. 18-23. 8 Num. xiv. 14. 4 2 Cor. iv. 6. « I Cor. xiii. 12; 2 Cor. ii. 10 ; 2 Thess. i. 9. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST QI for the time when he would no longer see through a mirror as through a puzzUng and baffling enigma, but would be able to look Jesus Christ in the eye again, " face to face." ' 2. The Image of God Paul expressly speaks of " Christ, who is the image of God." 2 By this term Paul means much more than moral likeness to God^ Man in his power bears the image and glory of God.^ It is the destiny of believers to bear the image of the Son of God.« But in this passage Paul means a great deal more. He here presents not the idea of mere similarity ,« but the representation and manifestation of God7 It is the divine nature and absolute moral excellence of Jesus that Paul has here in mind as in Colossians i. 15*. " Who is the image of the invisible God, the first- born of all creation." « Paul had evidently come to see that Jesus Christ was worthy to be called God. Indeed, the correct text of Acts xx. 28, in Paul's address to the Ephesian elders, has - Church of God which He purchased with His own blood." So in Romans ix. 5 the most natural punctua- tion has " God blessed forever " in apposition to , ^ ... ,^ 22 Cor. iv. 4. 1 I Cor. xiii, 12. ^, ., ••• 3 Col. iii. 10; 1 Cor. xv. 49; P^iil- "i- 2^' ... ^ , ^r.. \\\ iS 4 T Tor xi 7 ^ I^O"^' ^"^' ^9 ; 2 Cor. 11. 18. « Or likenesl' ' Cf. Thayer's Lexicon. « Cf. Heb. i. 3. 92 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS ** Christ concerning the flesh, who is over all." Paul clearly taught the preexistent state and glory of Jesus Christ in heaven/ Christ existed in the form of God and on an equality with God in heaven before His birth and humiliation.^ Whatever the *' Kenosis " means or does not mean, Paul is clear as to the essential deity of Christ in heaven. He had the form of God in heaven as He had the form of a servant on earth.^ If He was a real man here. He was true God there. Paul grasped strongly the true deity of Jesus Christ into whose face he looked. It is not the " how," but the fact. Forsyth ^ puts the case of Paul as of all believers to-day when he says : •* If we ask how Eternal Godhead could make the actual condition of human nature His own, we must answer, as I have already said, that we do not know. We cannot follow the steps of the process, or make a psychological sketch." Nor does Paul attempt it, though he is certain of the fact. It is reassuring at any rate to see how a great scientist like Sir Ohver Lodge ^ finds no objection on scientific grounds to the fact " that a Divine Spirit — that the Deity Himself, indeed — went through this process in order to make Himself known to man, and also in order fully to » 2 Cor. viii. 9. « Phil. ii. 6. ^ phU. ii. 7. • " Person and Place of Jesus Christ," p. 320. 8 "Jesus or Christ" {Hibbert Journal Supplement for 1909), p. 119. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 93 realize the conditions and limitations of the free beings which, through evolution, had gradually been permitted to exist. . . . And this individualized and human aspect of the eternally Divine Spirit we know as Jesus of Nazareth, a man hke ourselves, save that the glory of that lofty Spirit shone through the fleshly covering and preserved it from the load of sin which follows from inadequate knowledge, im- perfect insight, animal ancestry, and alien will." In the face of this sure word from a really great scientist one need not be dismayed by the weak surrender of the deity of Jesus by modern theologians out of dread of " the category of supernaturalism." " One may question whether the first interpreters' specula- tions about Jesus can lay any stronger claim to finality than can their cosmology." * Dr. Case makes merry with the theologians who still believe that " God impinged upon the universe from without, He projected Himself into human history." But Sir Oliver Lodge, unlike Dr. Case, is not afraid of God in the face of Jesus Christ. We may never know how Christ is the image of God. Dr. Sanday has made a bold suggestion. He takes advantage of the new discussions concerning the subconscious self to suggest the possibility that the divine nature 1 Prof. S. J. Case, of the Divinity School of the University of Chicago, Biblical World, Jan., 191 1, p. 8. 94 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS of Jesus has its locus in this subhminal region of human nature.' He calls this notion " A Tentative Modern Christology." It is most assuredly attractive as over against the Chalcedonian conception of the Two Natures, but it is doubtful if after all it would not be a denial of the actual deity of Christ in spite of Dr. Sanday's express avowal of his own faith in the deity of Jesus Christ.^ But it is more than likely that after all one will be merely playing with phrases which do not square with the actual facts. The consciousness may have no " planes " at all in a material sense and the conscious rational will is more important than the unconscious occasional impulses.^ We shall probably have to continue to confess our ignorance of the ultimate facts concerning the Person of Christ. As a matter of fact, we do not understand either human nature in ourselves or divine nature in God. It is not surprising that we are somewhat helpless in grasping the idea of the combination of the two. Scientists like Lord Kelvin and Sir William Ramsay make no pretensions to expound the ulti- mate qualities of matter. Theologians may well be * " Christologies Ancient and Modern," pp. 163 fF. ^ Cf. Warfield, Princeton Theological Review^ Jan., 1911, p. 172. For a sympathetic review of Dr. Sanday's idea see The Interpreter for Jan., 191 1 (editorial). 3 For an able critique of Dr. Sanday's position see " Theology and the Subconscious," by the Right Rev, C. F. D'Arcy, D. D,, in the /libber t Journal for Jan., 191 1. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 95 equally humble in the higher realm of spirit. But there is no doubt at all as to where Paul placed Jesus. " It is not putting it too strongly to say that He had for Paul the religious value of God. To suppose that Paul could have classified Him, and put Him in a series along with the other great men who have contributed to the spiritual elevation of the race, is to deride his sincerity and his passion." ' It is just this conception of Jesus as God which has won for Him the adoration of men. '* We might suppose that such an idea would grow faint and shadowy, that such an image would fade and melt away amid the rest of time's dreams. But as a matter of practical experience, << ' That one face, far from vanish, rather grows, Or decomposes, but to recompose.' All generations of believers have proved its strange, unearthly attraction, its enduring permanence, its mighty and miraculous power." ^ 3. The Glory of God There was " the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." ^ Others besides Jesus have manifested the 1 Denney, " Jesus and the Gospel," p. 27. 2 Sir W. Robertson Nicoll in The British Weekly. • 2 Cor. iv. 6. 96 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS glory of God. Paul * has just spoken of the fact that *' the children of Israel could not look steadfastly upon the face of Moses for the glory of his face." This wonderful fact did not render Moses divine. For a careful argument showing the superiority of Jesus over Moses, as the Son is above the servant, see Hebrews iii. i-6. He merely reflected the tran- scendent glory which he had been beholding. At the death of Elijah there came " a chariot of fire, and horses of fire which parted them asunder ; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven." ^ But Elijah was not divine. The face of Stephen had looked like the face of an angel. He said : " Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man stand- ing on the right hand of God."^ In his exaltation Jesus is still " the Son of man." That is part of His glory .^ There was a humiliation in the Incarnation of Christ. Paul in a marvellous way pictures the descent of Christ from the throne of God to the death of the Cross.^ It is like coming down the long stair- way. But the descent was just to open up the way to God. Jesus in His humanity was the way to God.^ In His humanity He was able to give help to the seed of Abraham ^ and to make possible free com- munion with God. Jesus is the real Jacob's Ladder 1 2 Cor. iii. 7. ^2 Kings ii. 11. ^ Acts vi 15 ; vii. 56. *C{. Heb. iii. i-io. " Phil. ii. 5-9. 6 John xiv. 6. "> Heb. ii. 16. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 97 between heaven and earth .^ Men can thus ascend upon the Son of man to heaven as angels descend upon Him. «' But we behold Him who hath been made a little lower than the angels, even Jesus, be- cause of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honour, that by the grace of God He should taste of death for every man." ^ There was a glory in Jesus in the days of His flesh. Peter if he wrote the Second Epistle (which I am glad to know is the view of Bigg^) has a vivid recollection of that wonder- ful night on the Mount of Transfiguration : " But we were eye-witnesses of His majesty. For He received from God the Father honour and glory, when there was borne such a voice to Him by the Majestic Glory, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased : and this voice we ourselves heard borne out of heaven, when we were with Him in the holy mount." ^ This transfiguration ^ was a temporary revelation of the glory which Jesus had with the Father before the Incarnation.^ The time came when Jesus longed for a final restoration of that glory by His return to the Father. John adds his testimony to that of Peter : " We beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father." ^ This took place after " the Word became flesh and 1 John i t; I "^ ^^^* "• ^* 3 " International and Crit. Commentary." ^ 2 Pet i. i6-i8. * Mark ix. 2. « John xvii. 5. ' John 1. 14. 98 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS dwelt among us " (tabernacled with us). Whether John is referring only to the Transfiguration of Jesus we do not know. He seems to include others in this witness. There were other times when there was a strange glory in the look of Jesus. As Jesus went up to Jerusalem the last time, full of thoughts of His death (as at the Transfiguration), we read : " And Jesus was going before them : and they were amazed ; and they that followed were afraid." * But it was true of the whole life of Jesus that " He mani- fested His glory " ^ by His miracles. By the grave of Lazarus Jesus said to Martha : *' Said I not unto thee that, if thou believedst, thou shouldst see the glory of God ? " ^ It was true of Jesus, as it was not true of Moses, that He was and is the glory of God, " No man hath seen God at any time ; the only be- gotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him." ^ The best manuscripts here read " God only begotten." In His humanity Jesus has revealed the Father. The one who really sees Jesus has seen the Father.^ Jesus is God's Word about Himself to men. He has made the full and final interpretation ^ of God to men. " He is the only window which opens out and gives the vision of that far-off land. I, for my part, believe that, if I 1 Mark x. 32. 2 John ii. 11. ^ John xi. 40. * John i. 18. 6 John xiv. 8 flf. e John i. 18. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 99 might use such a metaphor, He is the Columbus of the New World." ' This is Paul's conception of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. «' Christ on the throne was, if one may say so, a more im- mediate certainty to Paul, than Jesus on the banks of the lake, or even Jesus on the cross." ^ 4. Christ Jesus as Lord This is the way Paul preached.^ The words are carefully chosen. It is possible that Paul may have heard thus early of the incipient Gnosticism which later appeared in the Lycus Valley in Asia and which is combated in Colossians^ and Ephesians. But that is hardly probable, though Paul had recently come from Ephesus. These Gnostics were of two types in their attitude towards the Person of Christ. The Docetic Gnostics denied the actual humanity of Christ. He merely seemed to be a man. The Cerinthian Gnostics made a sharp distinction between the man Jesus and the Christ (an cBon or emanation of God which came upon Jesus at His baptism and left Him before His death on the Cross). The lan- guage of Paul here at any rate contravenes both of these theories, especially the Cerinthian. He identi- iMaclaren, "Expositions of Holy Scripture," 2 Corinthians, ^' ^Denney, 2 Corinthians, p. 154. . . „ ^ .' ^ Cor. iv. 5. * So Lightfoot. Hort, " Judaistic Christianity," fails to see any re- ference to Gnosticism. lOO THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS fies the one personality whom he designates " Christ Jesus " as also " Lord." He was the man Jesus, the Messiah (Christ), the Lord of glory. There has been a curious swinging of the pendulum among certain theologians through the ages concerning the person of Christ. The Ebionites denied the deity of Jesus. The Docetic Gnostics rejected His humanity. Paul recognized both as true of Christ Jesus. He is to Paul the God- man. Is this reality or merely Paul's interpretation? Paul did not originate this interpretation. The other apostles had so under- stood Jesus. Hear Peter on the Day of Pentecost : " Let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made Him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom ye crucified." * If one begin with the earHest known sources of the life of Christ according to modern criticism, either Q (the Logia of Matthew) or Mark's Gospel, he will find Jesus Christ the Lord of glory there.2 The Christ of the Synoptic Gospels, of Paul, of John, of Hebrews, of Peter, of James, of the Apocalypse is one and the same; Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to-day and forever.^ The various writers of the New Testament approach the * Acts ii. 36. ' Cf. MuUins, " The Modern Issue as to the Person of Christ," Review and Expositor, Jan., 1911, pp. i4fF. 8 See this argument worked out with great ability and detail by Warfield, " The Lord of Glory " ; Denney, " Jesus and the Gospel " ; Selbie, «' Aspects of Christ." Biblical Theology, accenting the THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST lOI Study of Jesus from different angles, but each comes to the same point in fact. It is a lame conclusion to which Schweitzer comes in his " Quest of the Histor- ical Jesus." After long rambles through the mazes of conflicting critical theories he says : *' He comes to us as One unknown, without a name, as of old, by the lake-side, He came to those men who knew Him not." * None are so blind as those who will not see. Men come to Christ to-day, as of old, with their prejudices and their philosophy and cannot see His glory because of the fog around their own heads. The sun shines brightly for all who can get out of the fog. The very " greatness of Christ "^ makes critical interpretation difficult and in a sense impos- sible. It is hard to look straight at the sun. But the sun shines on regardless of the changing theories about light and the spots in the sun. " The Life of Christ in Recent Research " ^ is an interesting topic, as is " The Place of Christ in Modern Theology." ^ We must use freely and frankly our reason and all light from every source for the interpretation of Jesus Christ. We have nothing to fear. Evolution " has set Christ in a new hght. Confined within variations in the New Testament, and criticism of the sources have thus combined greatly to strengthen the argument for the truth of Paul's view of Jesus. 1 P. 401. « Forsyth, " Person and Place of Jesus Christ," pp. 63 ff. > Sanday. ■* Fairbairn. I02 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS human limits, He is the stultification of the calcula- tions of evolutionists, viewed as our moral natures direct us to view Him, He is the goal and crown of the evolutionary process in the history of man." * It is a curious controversy that has arisen around the phrase " Jesus or Christ " and that appears in The Hibbert Journal Supplement? But at any rate one can get here all sides of the problem. The point with Rev. R. Roberts, who started the discussion, is that Jesus as an historical character is one thing, the Christ of tradition quite another. It is assumed that criticism has disposed of the connection between Jesus and Christ. Criticism has done nothing of the kind. Some critics deny the historicity of Jesus altogether. In Germany there is a controversy over the historical reality of Jesus.^ Other critics admit the reality of Jesus, and make Christ a matter of faith. Others reject the Christ entirely and see only a good man named Jesus who is our example to- day. Others admit the existence of Jesus, and, like Nietzsche, rail at Him as the curse of the race by reason of the limitations on self-indulgence which He has imposed on the " super-man." But most of the ablest critics in the world still joyfully see in Jesus 1 G. A. Johnston Ross, " Religionist and Scientist " in " Religion and the Modern W^orld," p, 14. s For 1909. 3Cf. Biblische Zeitschrift, 1910, S. 415-17, for bibliography of this discussion; also American Journal of Theology, Jan., 191 1. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 103 Christ what Paul saw, the man Christ Jesus as the Lord of glory. Son of God and Son of Man. " Therefore, not * away from Paul and back to Jesus,' but rather as one ' of his recent apologists puts it, * Back through Paul to Jesus and to God.' " ^ To Paul Jesus was and is Lord of life, the very power of God at work among men.^ When Ecce Homo first appeared many feared to look at this bold and brilliant picture of the earthly hfe of Jesus. But now we can come back from the fuller study of "the days of His flesh" to a richer knowledge of His heavenly glory. We see no conflict be- tween the " Christ of History and Experience." ^ But one must have the experience before he is really qualified to study the history. The alternative " Jesus or Christ " exists only for those who have never learned by experience "what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory." ^ To Paul Christ is the mystery of God,« " for in Him dwelleth all the fullness of the God- head bodily." 7 1 A. Meyer, Jesus oder Paulus, S. 104, « George Milligan, " Paulinism and the Religion of Jesus " in « Religion and the Modern World," p. 253. 8 Col. i. 15-17; cf. Selbie, « Aspects of Christ," p. 88. * Forrest. ^ Col. i. 27. « Col. ii. 2. ■J Col. ii. 9. « The Christ of To-day " (G. Campbell Morgan) is the Christ of Paul. I04 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS 5. The Gospel of the Glory of Christ This is Paul's Christology : " The hght of the Gos- pel of the glory of Christ." * He speaks twice in Romans ^ of " My Gospel." He means by that phrase his interpretation of Christ, " the Gospel of Christ." ^ Paul had a definite message about Jesus to preach to men. It is seen in its fullest expression in the Epistle to the Romans, but it is found with more or less fullness in all his writings. There is little excuse for any man, minister or not, to take the time and attention of others, if he has not made up his mind about Jesus Christ. No message of doubt or negation will benefit the soul sick with sin and battling with temptation. Paul felt that he had the right to speak just because of his actual knowledge of Jesus Christ who had revealed Himself in him.^ He knew the Gospel of Christ.^ Paul felt that a high and holy trust was given to him. He told Timothy of " the Gospel of the glory of the blessed God which was committed to my trust." ^ " To catch but a passing vision of the glory of God is to burn forever afterwards with a zeal to make it known." ^ No one could deceive him with a different message. He has only irony for those who put up with " another * 2 Cor. iv. 4 ; cf. iv. 6. ' Rom. ii. 16 ; xvi, 25. "Rom, XV. 19. 4 Gal. i. 16, » Gal. i. 6-10. « 2 Tim. i. II ; cf. Gal. ii. 7. ' Greenough, " The Mind of Christ in St. Paul," p. 14. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST I05 Jesus," " a different spirit," " a different Gospel." ' It fs only about the most tremendous things in life that Paul has such a strong word. He is the exponent of freedom for the Gentile Christians from the bondage of Judaism. *' For freedom did Christ set us free." ^ But liberty is not license. To give up Christ is to give up liberty and have either the slavery of license or the bondage of the letter. Paul is here an ex- ample for the modern minister in the firm grasp of the essential truth in Christ with the utmost liberality in all other matters. The preacher to-day has to sail between the Scylla of traditionalism and the Charyb- dis of radicalism. But Paul kept his eye on Christ. There is no better interpreter of Jesus Christ than Paul.^ He grew in his apprehension of Christ,^ as can be seen by reading his Epistles in probable chronological order.^ But he never got away from his early conception of Jesus as the Redeemer and of salvation by grace through faith.^ There is a dis- tinct " mental growth " ^ perceptible in Paul as he 1 2 Cor. xi. 4. 3 Gal. v. i. 3 See DuBose, " The Gospel According to St. Paul " ; Bruce, " St. Paul's Conception of Christianity " ; Somerville, " St. Paul's Conception of Christ " ; Stevens, " Pauline Theology " ; Dykes, «' The Gospel According to St. Paul " ; Anonymous, " The Fifth Gospel, The Pauline Interpretation." ^ See Matheson, " Spiritual Development of St. Paul "; Sabatier, «' The Apostle Paul." 5 Robertson, " Students' Chronological New Testament." fi Acts xiii, 38 f. ' Fairbairn, " Studies in Religion and Theology," p. 535. Io6 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS grapples with the greatest questions ever brought before the human mind. He became the greatest intellectual expounder of Christ in all history. He is that to-day. He had " the light of the Gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." * He was able " to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."^ The " light " ^ was an illumination of Paul's own inner man. It filled the whole horizon of his Hfe. 6. W/io Shined in Our Hearts With Paul this was the beginning of everything when God shone in his heart. He has in the words, *' Light shall shine out of darkness," ^ a reference to Genesis i. 3.^ " It is the proclamation of a second Fiat Lux in the hearts of men." ^ Jesus was the Light of the world in the cosmic creative sense in the begin- ning.7 " The life was the light of men. And the light shineth in the darkness ; and the darkness over- came it not." ^ The darkness could not put out the Light in the terrific conflict that ensued. But men became so used to the darkness that they could not see when the light came. " I am come a light into the world ; " ^ " I am the light of the world." '" " And 1 2 Cor. iv. 4. 2 2 Cor. iv. 6. ' The word occurs nowhere else in the New Testament. * 2 Cor. iv. 6. 5 cf, Ps. xcii. 4, « Bernard, in loco. "> Cf. John i. 3 f. ; Col. i. 16 f. 8 John i. 4 f. ; cf. John xii. 35. 9 John xii. 46. w John viii. 12. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 107 this is the judgment, that the hght is come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light, for their works were evil." ^ " Look therefore whether the light that is in thee be not darkness." ^ Isaiah had foreseen the glory of Christ and that, when He came, men's eyes would be blinded so that they could not see the light.^ Paul has lived to see the sad fulfillment of this prophecy, ** The god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the Gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them." * It was like daybreak ^ in any heart when God let the Light in the face of Jesus shine in. The word of prophecy was well in its place. It was like " a lamp shining in a dark place." ^ It is a squalid,^ dirty, dark place. In a dungeon a lamp is a blessing of untold comfort. But the lamp was of special use only ** until the day dawn, and the day-star arise in your hearts." ^ The " light-bringing " star has arisen in our hearts. It is daybreak in our souls. We no longer need the lamp. God " shined in our hearts." ^ This is the fundamental fact with Paul, as with all disciples of Jesus. " In that face which flashed upon > John iii. 19. 2 Luke xii. 35. ' John xii. 40 f. ; Isa. vi. lO. * 2 Cor. iv. 4. « Cf. Rev. xxi. 21. 8 2 Peter i. 19. ' Here only in the New Testament. 8 Day-star here only in the New Testament. ' Cf. Lietzmann, Handbuch zum JV. 7",, 2 Kor., S. 182. I08 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS him by Damascus twenty years before, he had seen, and always saw, all that man could see of the in- visible God. It represented for him, and all to whom he preached, the Sovereignty and the Redeeming Love of God, as completely as man could understand them." ' He could not indeed see for the glory of that light which made the noonday sun dim by com- parison.2 But henceforth he could see naught else but the glory in the face of Jesus. This to him was the sheet-anchor of his faith, hope, theology, life. '* I know Him whom I have believed." ^ Others might or might not know Jesus Christ. That did not affect Paul in the least. He is now crucified with Christ. " And it is no longer I that live, but Christ liveth in me." ^ The key-word of Paul's life is " in Christ." Into this mystic phrase Paul pours all the content of his life and thought about Christ.*^ Paul grounds his apologetic in his own experience. That is scientific and modern as well, in perfect harmony with the evolutionary principle. It is no longer possible to ridicule Christian experience as something abnormal and distorted. William James * did a great service to the world in showing the scien- * Denney, 2 Corinthians, p. 153. ' Acts xxii, 11 ; xxvi. 13. 3 2 Tim. i. 12. •iGal, ii. 20. 6 Cf. Campbell, " Paul the Mystic " ; Deissmann, " Die Neutesta menlliclie Forme) in Christo." «* " Varieties in Religious Experience." THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST 109 tific aspect of religious experience. With Paul it was an illumination ^ which shed hght into the secret places of his heart and Hfe. Christ is the true light who gives all the real light that any man has.^ Those who had once for alP been enlightened could never forget that experience and were ready to en- dure much conflict.* Jesus had brought to light Hfe and immortality through the Gospel for all those who had the eyes of their hearts enlightened.^ The image is a favourite one in the New Testament. John pic- tures heaven as needing no sun nor moon, " for the glory of God did lighten it, and the lamp thereof is the Lamb." ^ The dynamic of the Cross is central in Paul's mind.^ He does not mean that his own case is peculiar in this respect. The rather, he argues that, if God could save him through Christ, no one need despair.^ It is just because Jesus can save the worst of men that the preacher has the heart and hope to go on with his work. The self- conscious religionist often rejects Christ when the vilest sinners joyfully repent and put the " righteous " to shame.^ " The adequacy of the Christian redemp- J Cf. Eph. i. 18. 2 John i. 9. ^ Heb. vi. 4. * Heb. vi. 32. 5 2 Tim. i. 10 ; Eph. i. 18. ^ Rev. xxi. 23; xxii. 5. ' Cf. Clow, " The Cross and Christian Experience." 8 Cf. 2 Tim. i. 14-16. ^ Luke V. 30 f. Cf. Begbie, " Twice-born Men," and " Souls in Action." no THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS tion lies in its power to meet this primal need by re- moving the misery and guilt of sin." * 7. For Jesus' Sake " For we preach not ourselves." ^ That is the poorest theme ever taken by a preacher, himself. It is bad homiletics as well as bad religion when a preacher is full of himself, for he is sure to reveal it in numberless ways. Paul is ironical towards the Judaizers in Corinth who " commend themselves ; but they themselves, measuring themselves by them- selves, and comparing themselves with themselves, are without understanding." ^ They are the standard and are always right. They always come up to the standard, viz., themselves. Paul here evidently has them in mind. They do preach themselves. It is probably true that most ecclesiastical schisms have had their origin in personal jealousies and bickerings. And yet while " Christ Jesus as Lord " is the theme of Paul's preaching, he does in one sense preach himself — " and ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake."^ He was the slave of Christ and the slave ^ of his brethren. It was much for this proud-spirited man so to describe himself. But this is the spirit of » " Final Christianity," by D. MacFadyen, in " Mansfield College Essays," p, 211. » 2 Cor. iv. 5. 3 2 Cor. x. 12. *2 Cor. iv. 5. ^ Bond-slave. THE ATTRACTION OF CHRIST III Jesus, service to others.' It was for this purpose that the hght had come into his own heart " to give the Ught of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." ^ He had faced Christ and must re- flect the glory of that Face to others in darkness. He was to pass on the light. Paul knew " The Passion for Souls" 3 "for Jesus' Sake." Matheson describes the Twelve Apostles of Jesus as " His league of pity."* That is a fit characterization of ministers of Christ. The hunger of the heart is for Christ. Men know it after they have found Him. The need of the preacher is just this. He has his vision of the Face of Christ. He must turn the man without the vision to Christ. The Greeks came to Philip with a pathetic inquiry : " Sir, we would see Jesus." « Strange to say PhiHp did not introduce them to Jesus. He went instead to Andrew. Together they could not unravel the problem and brought it to Jesus. It touched the heart of Christ in the centre. The Cross came before His mind at once. Thus alone would Gentiles be able to come to Him, for thus would the middle wall of partition between Jew and Gentile and both and God be broken down.^ The modern minister stands beside the matchless portrait of Jesus Christ and hears the same cry from the 1 Matt. XX. 28. « 2 Cor. iv. 6. 3 j. H. Jowett. 4 « Studies of the Portrait of Christ," Vol. II, p. 83. . 5Johnxii.2i. 6Eph.ii. 112 THE LIGHT IN THE FACE OF JESUS masses : " Sir, we would see Jesus." It is not enough just to be willing " to speak a gude word for Jesus Christ," though that is much. One must be able to interpret that Picture to modern men. But first he must himself really see the Face of Christ, else his talk is sounding brass and tinkling cymbal. Paul has soared high. " No one ever soared so high on borrowed wings." * 1 Denney, ** Jesus and the Gospel," p. 3S. IV WITH OPEN FACE— THE PREACHER'S PRIVILEGE {2 Cor. Hi. ly-iv. ^) " We all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord," — 2 Cor. Hi. 18. IV WITH OPEN FACE—THE PREACHER'S PRIVILEGE THE " open face " is really the " unveiled face." * It is in sharp contrast with Moses who put a veil over his face. By " we all '' Paul means all Christians, though the argument is specifically applied to ministers of the Gospel: " Therefore seeing we have this ministry." ^ It is the privilege of all believers ; it is preeminently true of the preacher, not because of office or rank, but because of necessity he is constantly brought face to face with God in Christ. The minister has his " Holy of Holies " with Christ. I. Where the Spirit of the Lord Is One naturally thinks of a church by the use of this phrase. ^ Some churches are narrow and reac- tionary, tied to mere tradition. But Paul seems here to have in mind the minister himself. The man into whose heart the Spirit of the Lord has come has freedom from fear that the glory will die away as 1 There is thus a direct reference to iii. 7, 13. ' 2 Cor. iv. I. • 2 Cor. iii. 17. "5 Il6 WITH OPEN FACE with Moses. He is emancipated from anxiety that the people will not give him a proper degree of honour. He is not concerned about the amount of recognition which is accorded him at public func- tions. He has liberty, as Christ's freeman, from the bondage of the letter (condemnation, death). His is a ministry of the Spirit because the Spirit of the Lord has command of his heart and life. The Spirit- filled minister is empty of fear. There is no veil upon his face. Hence he has uninterrupted fellow- ship with Jesus and with the people. He is able to see " the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ " as well as to " give " it to others. Dr. Sanday * is patient with the Ritschlian type of " reduced Christianity " since it is that much positive gain over mere negation. Ritschlianism is proudly independent of historical facts and professes content with giving Jesus the " worth " of God as a practical matter. He very probably was not God in any metaphysical ontological sense according to this view, but one may find comfort in treating Him so. That is at bottom a make-believe doctrine and un- worthy of the great issue involved.^ The concession of Dr. Sanday about the subliminal self as the locus of the divine nature of Jesus is already urged as * " Christologies, Ancient and Modern." 9 Cf. Orr. «' Ritschlianism." THE PREACHER'S PRIVILEGE II7 making Dr. Sanday more of a Ritschlian than he thinks/ since it does not demand the Virgin Birth. But Paul does not here mean the Hcense of a half- hearted Christianity. That is after all the bondage of doubt and fear. It is love that makes us really free to do right. " Love makes the choice easy. Love makes the face of duty beautiful. Love makes it sweet to keep up with Christ. Love makes the service of goodness freedom." ^ This hberty in serv- ice is to Paul the distinguishing feature of Christi- anity.^ He has no notion of giving it up " because of the false brethren privily brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they may bring us into bondage." ^ There are always on hand some men who feel called to slip a noose on the neck of God's freemen, but Paul would wear no man's yoke but that of Christ. " If therefore the Son shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed." ^ Jesus put it also thus : " Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." ^ The only real emancipation is in the truth, and Jesus is the truth. Paul is no blind obscurantist. He glories in his freedom from the fetters of Pharisaism. In Christ he faces the whole world and all fact and 1 Shailer Matthews, American Journal of Theology, Jan., 1910, p. 136. 2 Greenough, "The Mind of Christ in St. Paul," p. 216. 8 Ibid.t p. 39. * Gal. ii. 4. ^ John viii. 36. « John viii. 32. Il8 WITH OPEN FACE truth with open eye and eager heart. No one has anything Hke the Hberty of the man whose mind is opened by the Spirit of Christ. Some Christians, some ministers, are in truth mere traditionahsts, ob- scurantists afraid of the Hght. But that is not what should be nor what is meant to be by the Spirit of Christ. There are reactionaries in medicine, science, law, business, every calling of life. Certainly the man who refuses to face all the facts of the spiritual life in Christ is not free. Such freedom is only possi- ble where the Spirit of the Lord is. " The Lord is the Spirit " hardly means simple identification of Jesus and the Spirit. The thought is not so simple as that. It is rather Christ manifesting Himself through His Spirit who is the great teacher and interpreter of Christ to men. The minister who is Christ's slave is the real freeman, free to look God and man full in the face with open heart and upright purpose. The Christian minister is to expound principles, not mere rules. There is the utmost frankness in his attitude and life. The veil has been taken away from his face. The people are not afraid to come close to him as they were with Moses.^ The Christian minis- try is thus 3 a " spiritual " ministry, a " Hfe-giving " ministry, a " bold " ministry. " Ours should be a > 2 Cor. iii. i6. ' Ex. xxxiv. 30. 3 F. W. Robertson, « Life and Letters," etc., p. 624 f. THE PREACHER'S PRIVILEGE II9 ministry whose words are not compacted of baldness, but boldness ; whose very life is outspokenness, and free fearlessness ; a ministry which has no conceal- ment, no reserve ; which scorns to take a via media because it is safe in the eyes of the world ; which shrinks from the weakness of mere cautiousness, but which exults even in failure, if the truth has been spoken, with a joyful confidence. For a man who sees into the heart of things speaks out not timidly, nor superstitiously, but with a brow unveiled, and with a speech as free as his spirit : * The truth has made him free.' " ' Paul is so free from narrowness and jealousy that he rejoices when Christ is preached even though the motive may be envy of Paul (Phil. i. 17 f.) or mere pretense. 2. Transformation This freedom of the Christian is no mere theory with Paul. He can proudly appeal to the experience of all real disciples, preachers and all, in contrast to the Jews under the Mosaic dispensation. " We all, with unveiled face, are transformed into the same image." ^ There is doubt whether here Paul means 1 F. W. Robertson, « Life and Letters," etc., p. 675. Cf. Words- worth ; " While with an eye made quiet by the power Of harmony and the deep power of joy We see into the life of things." a 2 Cor. iii. 18. I20 WITH OPEN FACE " beholding in a mirror " or " reflecting as a mirror." ^ The analogy of i Corinthians xiii. 12: "For now we see in a mirror, darkly ; but then face to face " argues for " beholding." ^ It is true that we shall not look Christ fully in the face till we meet Him in glory when we shall see Him as He is.^ But even Moses had no veil on his face as he beheld the glory of God and it can hardly be a mere indirect look at Christ that Paul has in mind. He expressly men- tions *' the face of Jesus Christ." It is doubtless true, however, that this word is to be thus translated here, since Paul in this context has both ideas in mind. All believers have free access to the Face of Jesus Christ, the Glory and Image of God. It is no mere contemplation of the moral beauty of Jesus of Nazareth that fills the vision of Paul. No mere his- torical study of the facts in the earthly life of Jesus will suffice to work this transformation in the heart and life. The transformation is wrought by the Spirit of God in the heart that, free from the veil, is in actual touch with Christ the Lord of glory.^ There is contemplation of the glory of Christ, trans- formation into the glory of Christ, final assimilation * Only here in the New Testament. 2 So in Philo, Le,s^. All. iii. 33, a comment on Ex. xxxiii. 18. The active means to mirror or reflect, while the middle voice, as here, means to behold in a mirror, Cf. Bernard, in loco; Meyer, in loco ; Bachmann, in loco^ for discussion of the details. * I John iii. 2. ■» Denney, 2 Corinthians, p. 140 f. THE PREACHER'S PRIVILEGE 121 into the glory of Christ.* The word for " transfor- mation " ^ is a remarkable one. It is the word used of the glory of Christ at the Transfiguration. It is then a transfiguration which we are undergoing. It is the present tense and the act is represented as a process. The new life in Christ begins with a look as the heart turns to Him. It grows by looking also, steadily bathing in the glory of the Sun of righteous- ness. " In spiritual sight, the soul which beholds is a mirror." ^ What seems like an impossibility van- ishes when we consider that it is the glory of God in Christ that Paul has in mind and that the seeing takes place by the eye of faith, the eye of the soul.^ It is true that, as contrasted with the final vision of Christ, we now see through a mirror darkly. " But nothing intervenes between my Lord and me, when I love and trust." ^ The reahty of this spiritual per- ception of Christ is witnessed by millions of believers in all the ages since Paul wrote these words. To many Jesus Christ is the most real person in the universe. " The whole tendency of modern thought is to emphasize the importance of personality. Per- sonality is the predominant factor in history and in * Maclaren, " Expositions of Holy Scripture, " in loco. 'Cf. Matt. xvii. 2. ' Maclaren, " Expositions of Holy Scripture, " in loco. 4 Ibid. ^Ibid, 122 WITH OPEN FACE life."^ Jesus had definitely laid hold on ^ Paul. Henceforth to " gain Christ," to " know Him," to learn " the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord," all this was the " one thing " which consumed his soul, the single goal of his Hfe-am- bition.3 A minister, to whom this experience of Christ is unknown, cannot be considered qualified to tell men about Jesus. He must himself be trans- figured by the Spirit of Christ, have the Spirit of Christ in him,^ if he hopes to see others transfigured by his hfe and words. This spiritual appropriation is the first result of contact with Christ. This is to " eat " ^ Christ, to " see " the Face of Christ, to " be- hold " His glory, to become like Him, even as Moses had the glory of God upon him. There is no magic about it. There is mysticism, indeed, for religion is mysticism. It is the vital touch of the human spirit by the Spirit of Christ. Thus the vision of Christ comes to the soul. Thus the vision is continued. The Gospels, the Acts, the Epistles, the Apocalypse, the work of Christ in the hearts of men, the work of Christ in our own hearts — these are all mirrors to help us see the glory of Christ.*' 3. Reflection As we have already seen, there is no doubt that « Richard Brook, The Interpreter, Jan., 1911, art, " The Living Christ and the Christian Life." « Phil. iii. 12. 3 Phil. iii. 8-14. < Rom. viii. 9. e John vi. 57. e cf. Bachraann, in loco. THE preacher's PRIVILEGE 1 23 this context calls for " reflecting as a mirror the glory of the Lord " as an implied idea however Paul meant the precise word here employed. Stanley^ holds that " Christians having, hke Moses, received in their lives the reflected glory of the divine presence, as Moses received it on his countenance, are unlike Moses in that they have no fear, such as his, of its vanishing away, but are confident of its continuing to shine in them with increasing lustre." The Christian puts on no veil for he has nothing to conceal. His life is an open book to the world. He does not, indeed, claim that his life is perfect, but that there is at least a reflection, however dim, of the real spirit and power of Christ, his Lord. " There is no reflection of the light without a previous re- ception of the light. In bodily sight, the eye is a mirror, and there is no sight without an image of the thing perceived being formed in the perceiving eye." ^ Chrysostom compares the influence of the light of Christ on us to polished silver lying in the sunshine and sending back the rays which strike it.^ He says, " We not only look upon the glory of God, but also catch thence a kind of radiance." ^ But, at any rate, reflection is an inevitable result of transformation.® 1 2 Corinthians, in loco. ' Maclaren, " Expositions of Holy Scripture," in loco. ' Denney, 2 Corinthians, in loco. * Horn. VII on 2 C