^;l *, ■ i-V •Ir * A PROSPECT 0 F FUTURITY, 1 N FOUR DISSERTATIONS ON THE Nature and Circumstances OF THE LIFE TO COME: WITH A PRELIMINARY DISCQURSTE On the Natural and Moral Evidenci^-s of a Future Stat e ; AND AN APPENDIX On the General Conflagration, of Burning of the World. By Thomas Broughton, A.M. Prebendary of S a R u M, and Vicar of St. Mary Redcliffe and St. Thomas in Bristol. LONDON: Printed for T. C a dell (SuccefTor to Air. Millar) in the Strand. M.DCC.LXVIII. The dissertations. I. The State of the Dead between Death and the Resurrection. II, The Resurrection. III. The Judgment of Mankind by Jesus Christ. IV, The Final State OF Retribution. A 1 ERRATA. Page 73. Note, for Introd. r. Prelim. Disc. 94. 1. 12. for Luke xxii. 28., r. Ibid. ver. 22. 138. 1. 20. after Parity infcrt of. 160. 1. antepenult, for 3. r. 39. 176. I. 14. for xi. 18 — -29. r. v. 28, 29. 1 8c. 1. 27. for thefe r. tho/e. 191. 1. 26. for Ckarity-Houfe r. Ckarter-Houfi. 207. 1. 1 5. for Czrcumjiances. r. Circumjiance. 232. ]. 9, for xjii. r. viii. 244. I. 17. for Apfijiles r. Jpofile. 309. Note 9. for 18. r. 8. lb. 1. ult. for TV/a r. 2 Tim. 354. 1. ult. for Jidicature r. Judicature. TO THE RIGHT REVERENrJ D\ THOMAS NEWTON, LORD BISHOP OF BRISTOL, My Lord, I Should not have prefumedi with-- out Leave firfl: obtained, to ad- drefs the following Work to your Lordfliip; being confcious of its Defedls, and of my own Inability to execute, with fufficient Learninc^ a^nd Judgment, fo extenfive and difficult an Undertaking. Such, however, as the Performance is, I humbly prefent it to your Lord/hip ; perfuaded," that your Lordfhip's Ac- A3 ceptance DEDICATION. ceptance of it will create a Prepof- feffion in its Favour, and effedlually recommend it to the Candor and Indulgence of the Public. That your Lordfhip may enjoy Health, and live to confer frefh Ob- ligations on the Chriftian World, al- ready greatly indebted to your Lord- fhip's fuccefsful Labours in the Ser- vice of our holy Religion, is the lin- cere Wifh and Prayer of, My Lord, Your Lordfhip's moft obedient and obliged humble Servant, Thomas Broughton. [ vii i PREFACE. TH E Subjedls of the following Dif- fer tat io7is are treated Theologi- cally and Critically* The Defign of the theological Parts, is, to exhibit, as briefly as may be, a clear and diftinft View of the Scripture-Dodtrine on the Subjedl of each Di/jertation> The Critical Parts are employed in fettling the true Meaning and Import of fuch Scriptures, as are of doubt- ful Interpretation, or attended with any Degree of Difficulty or Obfcurity — in ex- amining the Opinions of former Writers^ and the feveral Reprefentations they have given lis of the Nature and Circumjiances of a Future State — and in correBing the Mifapprehenfions or improper Ideas Chrif- tians are apt to entertain of the Life to comei as far as a modeji Exercife of Human Reafon, under the Guidance of Divi?ie Re- velation, . will permit. A 4 If viii PREFACE. If I am ailced. Why, in treating the Dodtrine of a Future State, I have confined niyfelf to Theology and Criticifm, and have entirely omitted, or butflightly mentioned. Its Fraclical life and hnprovement, though confefledly of the greateil Importance to the Chriftian Reader ; My anfwer is : There are ah-eady fo many PraBicdl Dif- courfes on (what are ufually called) the Four last Things ', that I faw no Want of another; and was confcious, I could add nothing to the Force of Reafon- ing and Eloquence, employed by the pious Authors of thofe Difcourfes, to enforce the Duties of Religion by the Motives and Sanations of the Gofpel. This, I pre- * Thefe are. Deaths 'Judgment, Heaven, and Hell. But, Why is the P.efurreci'ion always overlooked in Dif- courres on the Lajl Things ? Is it becaufe no particular PraSiicalUfe or Improvement can be made of it ? It may be fo. Yet fo great and important an Event, as the Re- union of ^oiil and Body, iind That after Death and before ^Judgment, cannot, without great Impropriety, be left out of the Number of Lafl Things ; which (if Writers choofe to retain That Number) may ftill be Four, viz. 1. Death, 3. Judgment, 2. Resurrection, 4. Heaven Be Situ Oilis, lib. 2. I Hiall Se(5t. I. Prelminary Dtfcourfe. o I fliall not (with a great modern Writer) al- ledge the antient Hebrews or Ifraelites^ as an Ex- ception to the Univerfality of this Belief ; though the SanBions of their Religion were purely tem- poral^ refpediing only the good and evil Thincrs of the prefent Life, For I fee no neccfTary or natural Connexion between thefe two Propofi- tions Mofes, in his Injlituies, omitted the Dodlrine of a Future State — and — The Hebrews or Ifraelites had not the Dodrine of a Future State ^ There were wife Reafons for the Omif- fwn-, Reafons, founded in the peculiar End and Defjgn of the JewiJ?i Difpenfation, and the extra- ordinary Nature of the Jewijh Government, as a Theocrajy, or Government adminiftered imme- diately by God himfelf. But, how This iliould hinder the People, in Subjedion to That Go- vernment, from acquiring the Knowledge of a Future State, by the fame Means that other Na- tions came by it, no good Reafon, I think, caa be affigned : They had the Light of Reafon and Nature in common with the reft of Mankind ; and we learn from St. Paul, that the Go/pel (con- taining the Dodrine of Life and Immortality) was preached to their great Anceftor Abraham (Gal. iii. 8.> from whom it muft naturally have been de- rived to his Pofterity. The want of Evidence, ^ See The Di-ome Legation of Mnfes dcmoyijiratedy Vol. 11. < II. BookV. Sect. V. :.ndVI. from 10 Prelmimry Difcourfe. Sed. i. from the Jew't/h Hijiory and JVritings, of That People's Acquaintance with the Doftrine of a Fu- Hire State, is far from proving their Ignorance of it i fince their zealous Attachment to the Law of Mofes, by which they were fo eminently dif- tinguifhed from all other Nations of the Earth, fufficiently accounts for xhtw feeming to be unin- fluenced by the Profpeifl of a Future State^ and to 3(51 purely upon the Motives of 'Temporal Re- ward and Funijliment. But, to proceed. In later Ages, and at this very Day, Religion, of fome Kind or other, or the Belief of a Su- preme Being, and of future Rewards and Pu- nifhments, is to be found in the moft ignorant and unenlightened Countries of the Globe •, as might be proved by the concurrent Teilimony of the moil credible Voyagers and Travellers. I fliall cite only an Author ', who lived fome Time among the Canibals of Brafil, and fays of them : " There is not any Nation in the World *' more remote from all Religion than thefe ** were : Yet to fhew, that there is fome Light " in the midft of this Darknefs, I can truly af- " firm, that they have not only fome Appre- " henfion of the Immortality of the Soul, but a *' moft confident Perfuafion of it. Their Opi- " nion is, that the Souls of ftout and valiant " Men, aiter Death, fly beyond the higheji Moiin- ■J Quoted by Abp. Tillot/on» Works'mYol. Vol. III. p. -• z. " ta?hSj Sed. I. Preliminary "Difcoiirfe. 1 1 " tains^ and there are gathered to their Fathers " and Grandfathers, and live in pleafant Gar- " dens, with ail Manner of Delights ^ ; but " the Souls of flothful and unadive Men, and " thofe who do nothing for their Country, are " carried to Agyman (the Devil) and live with *' him in perpetual Torments." If the Belief of a future State of Rewards and Punifhments has ever been found to poflefs the Minds of the mofl: barbarous and favage of the Human Race, we have good Reafon to con- clude, there never was a People utterly ignorant of, or entire Strangers to. That common Notion. It being evident, then, that there has been, and continues to be, an univerfal Confent of Man- « This Indian Sentiment is prettily expreffed by Mr. "Pope, in the following Lines. Lo ! the poor Indian, whofe untutor'd Mind Sees God in Clouds, or hears him in the Wind; His Soul proud Science never taught to ftray Far as the Solar Walk, or milky Way ; Yet fimple Nature to his Hope has giv'n beyond the cloud-topt Hill an humbler Heaven, Some fafer World, in Depths of Woods embrac'd. Some happier Ifland in the vvatry Wafle, Where Slaves once more their native Land behold. No Fiends torment, nor Chrillians thirlt for Gold : To be contents his natural Defire ; He alks no Angel's Wing, or Seraph's Fire ; But thinks, admitted to That equal Sky, His faithful Dog fhall bear him Company. JLJfay on Man, Ep. i. v. 9-, kind 12 Preliminary Difcoiirfc. Sedl. il kind in the Belief of a Future State^ let us cort- fider the Force of the Argument, arifing from this Harmony of Sentiment, for the Truth and Reality of a Life to come. Here this Queftion arifes ; From what Source was the general Belief of a Future State originally derived ? It is admitted, that the Lawgivers, Philofa- phers, and Poets of Antiquity were greatly in- 'ilru mental in fpreading the Belief of future Re-"- •wards and Punifhments throughout the leverai Nations of the habitable Earth. That the Eflablifhrnent of Religion, and the Belief of a Future State, was, in Part at leaft, the Work of the antient Legiflators, we are af- fured by Plutarch, who informs us *, that " in " all Civil Inftitutes, the firfl and moft impor- " tant Article was, the Belief of the Gods ; by '' the Means of which, Lycurgus planted Reli- " sion among the Lacedmnonians, Numa among "■ the Romans, antient Ion among the Athenians^ *' and Deucalion among the Greeks in general ; " and by Hopes afid Fears kept up among *' them an Awe and Reverence of Religion." An AfTertion abundantly confirmed by the whole Tenor of antient Hiftory. Philofophy did her Part, in fpreading the Ee- licf of a Future State. The Philofcphers, indeed, were far from being unanimous in teaching That 9 In his Traft Gdv. Cclo'.em. Doflrine. Se6t. I. Preliminary Difcourfe. 13 Do6trine. Whole Sedts of them, as the Pytha- goreans^ Peripatetics^ Stoics^ and Epicureans^ ex- prefly denied a Future State. And even thole, who adlually taught it, did not invarially pro- fefs their Belief of it. This has been alledged as a Proof, that they did not really believe it them- felves, but taught it purely v/ith a View to the Good of Society ^ A Qucftion, I (hall not here take into Confideration, having delivered my Sentiments concerning it in another Place *. This is certain, that the Arguments, the Philo- fopbers a.dv3inced, in Proof of the Dc£lrine of a Future State^ mud have produced the intended Effedt in their Admirers and Followers, and have contributed not a little to the general Be- lief of a Life to come. Who could hear the Di- vine Plato afierting, that " the good and evil *' Things of this Life are nothing, as to Num- ** ber and Greatnefs, compared with the Re- ** wards of Virtue and Punifhments of Vice, ^' which attend Men after Death j " or the fame great Philofopher, in the Perfon of Socrates^ demonftrating the Immortality of the Soul., and a Future State., by a Variety o^ convincing Argu- ' See Bp. Warhuriori s D'fvine hegatiojt of Mnfes demonjlrated., ^ook II. Seft. II and III. alfo, A critical Eniuiry into the O- finiojis and Pradices of the antient Philofophers, Lond. 1747. Ch. I. * Defence of the commovJy-rccdved DoSlrine of the Human Soul, p. 46-— 50. ments : 14 Preliminary Difcourfe. Se(5t. r. merits ' : Who could hear the great Roman Ora- tor and Philofopher profefiing, in the Perfon of the elder Calo, his jBrm Perfuafion, " that Sci~ " pioy L.Iajor, five de ^ene^ute, C. 21 , 23. to Sed. I. Freliminary Difcourfe. 15 to the Fancies and Defcriptions of the Poets, than to the Civil Inftitutes of the Legijlators, or the refined Argumentation o£ xh^ Philofophers. From what has been faid, it may be thought, that I have pointed out the true Source and On- gin of the general Belief of a Future State, and that it was the Joint-work of the Legijlators, Phi- lofcphers, and Poets ; or, rather, derived from the Policy of the Lazvgivers, feconded by the Reafonings of the Phikfophers, and the Fidions of the Poets. And, accordingly, Atheijiical Men have objected to Religion, as being a mere Crea- ture of Politics, the Offspring of State-craft, de- vifed for the Sake of its Utility, or Subferviency to the public Good. But the Concluficn is faife, and the Fad quite otherwiie. For, with Refped to the Lawgivers -, if we " look through all Greek, Roman, and Bar- " barous Antiquity" (fays the learned Bi/lwp of Glocefier) " it will appear, that not one fingle " Lawgiver ever found a People, how wild or " unimproved foever, without a Religion, when " he undertook to civilize them. On the con- " trary, we fee them all, even to the Lawgivers " of the Thracians and Americans, addrefling *' themfelves to the favage Tribes, with the Cre- " dentials of That God, who was there profef- " fedly acknowledged and adored.'* From whence, and other Confiderations, drawn from the Hijiory of the Lawgivers^ the Sayings recorded of I them. t6 Preliminary Difcourfe. Scd. i; them, and the Fragments oi ihtw Writings yet re- maining, his Lordn-iipjuftly concludes, " They " FOUND Religion, and did not make it ^" As to the Philofophers and Pocts^ let Bp. Sher- lock determine the Point. " The natural Evi- " dence of Life and Immortality'* (fays his Lordfiiip) " flands equally clear of the Inven- tions of Poetry, and the Subtilties and Re- finements of Philofophy •, and, though it be allied to Both, yet it arofe from neither. As to fuch as imagine, that the Notion of a future Life arofe from the Defcriptions and Inventions of Poets, they may even as well fuppofe, that Eating and Drinking had the fame Original, and that Men had never thought of it but for the fine Feails and Entertainments, which are defcribed in fuch Writers The Poets found Men in PofTeffion of the Do<5trine of a future State of Rewards and Punifhments for good and bad Men. Upon this Founda- tion they went to Work ; and the plain Draught of Nature was almoft hid under the Shades and Colours, with which they endeavoured to beautify and adorn it The Philofophers found the fame Perfuafion in themfelves and others j and, as their Profeflion led them,^ fought out for Phyfical Reafons to fupport the Caufe- But ftill the natural Evidence is J Divine Legation rf Mo/cs, Part II, Book IU. Sec- tion VI. 5 " p'ior Sefl. I. Preliminary Difcotirfe. ly *' prior to their Enquiries, and ftands upon an- -" other Foot, the common Senfe and AppreT *' henfion of Mankind *." We mud, therefore, look a little farther, than to the Lawgivers, Philofophers, or Poets, for the Scurce and Origin of That univerfal Perfuajion of a Future State we find to have prevailed through- out the World. And where can we find it, but in (what Bp. Sherlock calls) " the common Senfe " and Apprehenfion of Mankind?" Impartial Reafon and Nature lead to the Expeflation of a Future State, by prefenting to the unprejudiced Mind fuch Evidence of its Truth and Reality, as is not to be refifted. A Detail of this Evi- dence is not my prefent Bufinefs. It is fufficient to obferve, that the Arguments from Reafon ana Nature, in Proof of a Future State, abundantly account for the general Reception of That Doc- trine, among all Nations of the Earth. And can there be a {\.ronger prefumptive Ar- gument for the Truth of any Dodrine, than that it is tlie Di6late of Reafon and Nature, and uni- verfally embraced as fuch ? Ariflotle^ in his To- pics, lays it down as a Rule of judging from Au^ thority, that what fome wife Men think to be true, is in fome Degree probable \ what is believed by moft wife Men, is yet more pro- bable ', what mofi men, both wife and unv/ife, aiTe nt to, has a ftill higher Degree of Probability ; i Several Difcourfes, ^c Vol. I. Difc. VI. C bag i8 Preliminary Difcourfe. Sedl. t^ but what ALL Men have generally confented to, has this Evidence in the higheji polTible Degree. The Force of this Argument, in Proof of a Fu- ture Slaie, is acknowledged both by Cicero and Seneca. " As Nature " (fays the former) teaches '' us to believe, that there are Gods — fo the " Confent of all Nations induces us to believe, " that the Soul is immortal ^." And the latter : " When we treat of the Soul's Immortality, we *' lay no fmall Strefs on the Confent of Man- " kind, either fearing or worfhipping the In- " fernals 7." And with good Reafon. For, the Univerfality of an Opinion proves it to be the Didlate of Reafon and Nature •, and fuch is the Connexion between Truth and the Human In- telleU^ that, as what is true will generally ap- prove itfelf to the Reafon and Underftanding of Mankind, fo whatever the Reafon and Under- ftanding of Mankind univerfally judge to be true^ has a juft Claim to be confidered as fuch. The Bijbelief of a Future State, the Effect of Atheifm in fome, and of Immorality in others, detrads nothing from the Force of this Argu- ment. The Number of fuch Unbelievers, how many foever there may have been, bears no Pro- portion to the Generality of Mankind •, and it is commonly and juftly faid, that there is no gene- ral Rule v/ithout an Exception. Nor is the mod confirmed Infidelity any Proof, that the Belief of a Future State is not natural even to the Mind ^ Tufc. Difp. 1. 1. c. 16. -^Ep. 117. of h Sed:. I. Preliminary DifcoUrfe. i^ of the Infidel himfelf, fince it is certain, that Men may over-rule their natural Apprehenfions of thino-s, debauch their Underftandings, and reafon themfelves (if it can be called reafoning) out of the cleareft Principles and Notions im- planted in their Minds. The Argument for the Reality of a Future State, taken from the univerfal Confent of Man- kind in the Belief of fuch a State, receives addi- tional Strength from That Defire and Hope of Immortality, and thofe Workings of Natural Con- fcience, which every Man experiences, more or lefs, in his own Mind. Thefe not only tend to fhew, that the Belief of a Future State is a na- tural, and, confequently, a general Perfuafion,. but afford a peculiar Evidence of a hife to come. It will not be difputed, that there exifts in the Human Mind a natural Defire and Hop of Immortality. " Nature herfelf" (fays Cicero) " doth filently declare the Immortality of the *' Soul — and there inheres in the Minds of Men '* a Kind of Prefage or Anticipation of Futu- " rity^" Senfual Minds may, perhaps, feel little '* or nothing of this natural Hope and Defire of endlefs Being. But, in rational, fober, and virtuous Minds, this Anticipation of Futurity fpontaneoufly and naturally fprings up '. Now, from sTufc. Difp. 1. I. c. 14, 15. 9 " Fancy a Man " (fays the ingenious Mr. Woolajlon) ** walking in fome retired Field, free from Noife, and free C 2 << from 20 Preliminary Difcourfe, Se<£l. i^ from the Generality of this Difire we infer the Reality of its Ohjcol. Nature has plainly given us ** from Prejudice, to debate this Matter with himfelf : and *' then judge, whether fuch Meditations as thefe would not " be juil. I think, I may be fure, that neither lifelefs Mat^ ** ter, nor the 'vegetati've Trihe, that Stone, that Flower, ** that Tree, have any reflex Thoughts : nor do i\iefenji(i-ve *' Animals., that Sheep, that Ox, feem to have any fuch *' Thing, or but in the loweft Degree, and in refped of pre- *' fent Objedls only. They do not rea/oji, nor difcourfe. I ** may therefore certainly pretend to be fomething much ** abo've all thefe things. I not only apprehend and confi- ** der thefe external ObjeSls afting at prefent upon my " Nerves, but have Ideas raifed within myfelf of a higher ** Order, and many : I can, not only reprefent to myfelf ** things, that'izr^, or hwue heen, hnt. deduce m^-ny others ♦' from them, make Excurfions into FuUirity, and forefee ** much of what will be, or at leaft may be; by Uriel think- " ing, I had a) mod faid, get into ancther World, before- *' hand : and, whether I fhall live in feme other State after " death, or not, I am certainly a Being capable of fuch an *• ExpeSlation, and cannot but be folicitous about it : none " of which Things can be faid of thefe Clods, or thofe Brutes. *♦ Can I then be defigned for nothing further, than jufi; to ** eat, drink, fleep, walk about, and aft upon this Earth ; " that is, to have no further Being, than what thefe Brutes •' have, fo far beneath me ? Can I be made capable of fuch ** great ExpeJlations, which thofe Animals know nothing of *,' (happier by fai- in this Regard than I am, if we mull die " alike) only to be difappointed at lajl ? Thus placed, juft ** upon the Confines of another better World, and fed with *' Hopes of penetrating into it, and enjoying it, only to " make a JJtiort Appearance here, and then to be Jhut outy *' and totally funk? Muft I, then, v.hen I bid my lall Fare- «' well Se6t. I. Preliminary Difcciirfe. 21 us thefe Hopes : but Ndttire^ we are fure, does nothing in vain. Were there no Future State, Na- ture would have implanted in our Minds a De- fire, which can never be fatisfied, and raifed in us an Expe5lation of what can never come to pafs. If we would do Juftice to the Wifdom of our al- nmighty Creator, we muft confider the natural Defire and Hope of Immortality in the Mind of Man as an Intimation from God himfelf, that Man is, really, immortal *. " weil to thefe Walks, when I clofe thefe Lids, and yon- *' der blue Regions and all this Scene darken Upon me and " go out, muft I then only ferve to furnifli Duft to be ming- •' led with the Alhes of thefe Herds and Plants, or witfi ** this Dirt under my Feet ? Have I been fet fo far abciie *' them in Life, only to be lenjelled ivith them at Death ? " " Are fuch Meditations and Refieftjons as thefe well found- *' ed, or not ? If they arc, it muft be reafcnable to think, *• that God will fatisfy a rea/onable Expe^atio?t." Re/, of Nat.delin. 5th Edit. p. 209, 210. » This Argument is finely touched by Mr. Addifon^ in the famous Soliloquy of Cato, It muft be fo — Plato, thou reafon'ft well • Elfe whence this pleafing Hope, this fond Deiire, This longing after Immortality ? Or whence this fecret Dread, and inward Horror Of falling into nought ? Why Ihrinks the Soul Back on herfelf, and ftartles at DeftruAion ? 'Tis the Divinity that ftirs within us ; 'Tis Heaven itfelf that points out an Hereafter, And intimates Eternity to Man. ActV. 5ceneI, C 3 t In 22 Preliminary Difcourfe. Sed. i. In like Manner, the Workings of Natural Cnnfcience evince a future State of Rewards and PuniJIiments. This Evidence is mod clearly feen (or rather felt) in That Remorfe and Compunc- tion of Mind, That Fear and Bread of God's, avenging Jujlice, which, in Sinners not harden'd beyond all SenfibiUty, follows clofe upon the Heels of Guilt, and often forces the guilty to feek Relief from the Pain of a wounded Spirit in an open, unreferved, Confeffion of their Crimes. Were there no future Reckoning to be expedted, why fhould not ihe fecretly-wicked fm on without Remorfe and without Fear ? Why does Confcience play the Tyrant in their Breads ? The Truth is, Confcience is the Subjiitute of the Almighty, paf- fmg immediate Sentence of Approbation or Con- demnation on all our Aftions, and thereby giv- ing us Warning of a future Account, when fuch Sentence fhall be ratified, and followed by fuit- able Reward or Punifliment in another Life *. * When St. Paul reafoned, before the Roman Governor, of Righteoufnefs, Temper aiice, and 'Judgment to come, Felix (fays the Hiftorian ) trembled. Afts xxiv. 25. Trembled! At what ? The ApolHe accufed him of nothing j nor was he going to be called to an Account for any of his Aftions. He was quite fafe in That Refpeft. But the Profpeft, fet before him, of a Judgment to come, a Day of ftrift Account jbefore God, alarmed his Coti/cience, and put him in Fear of That Punifhment, he knew he well deferved, SEC- Sed. 2. Prelimmnry Difcourfe. 23 SECTION II. Jcr ? do that ixihich is good, and tbcu Jkait ha~je Praife of the fame. Rom. xaii. 3. follows, Se(5V. 3, Preliminary Bifcotirfe. 4-7 follows, that the Expedation of a Life to come a State ot Retribution in another World, is ne- cefTary to eftablifh the Sanmon of Reward, One of the main Hinges, on which Government ia general is ufually faid to turn. And, indeed* the more effedLuJly to influence Mankind to a right Condua of Life, it is neceffary, that pro. per Motives be applied to the Paffion oi Hope^ as well as to That of Fear ; that the Expedla' tion oi^Reward tray co-operate with the Profpefl of Punijlment, and Both together produce That right Behaviour, which One alone might be too weak to effefl. Thefe three Confiderations very clearly evince the great Utility and Importance (if not abfolute Neceffity) of the Belief of a future State of Re- wards and Punif/iments to the Support and Well- being of Society. It would be extremely diffi- cult, if not impoffible, to keep Mankind, in any tolerable Degree, within the Bounds of Ci. vil and Social Duty, and effeaually engage them in the Service and Advancement of the'^public Good, did not the Profped of an After-reckoning, an Account to be given to their Creator him- felf of their Behaviour in this World, fupply what is wanting to the Power and Influence of Human Laws. And hence arifes a ftrong Prcfumpticn, that the Belief of a future State oi Rewards and PmiifJi. mms is founded in rnUh and Reality. For we can 44 Preliminary Difcourfe. Se(fl. 3.. can hardly fuppofe a Doflrine of fuch mighty- Importance to the Happinefs of Mankind, even in this Life, to have no Foundation in Nature^ but to be a mere Creature of the Fancy or Imagination. On the contrary, As the Utility of the Doftrine of a Future State arifes from a Perfuafion <)f its Truth, fo its Truth may be in- ferred, with an high Degree of Probability, from its apparent and experienced Utility ". Secondly » ' Bi{hnp I'p'ari>urtou, who urges this Argument in a more abftrafted and mctaphyfical Way, thinks it flriflly conclu- sive or Demonftration itfelf. His Words are : " Lawgivers ** have unanimoufly concurred in propagating Religion, or *' the Belief of a future State of Rewards and funifhments. *' 7'his could be only from a Senfe and Experience of its " Utility ; in which they could not be deceived. Religion " therefore has a general Utility. We defire no more to *' eilablifh its 7r«^^. For Truib znA general Utility necejfcu- *' rily coincide. That is, Truth is produBi've of Utility, and " Utility is indicative of Truth. That Truth is produftive " of Utility, appears from the Nature of the Thing. The " obferving Truth, is afcing as Things are : He, who a£ls *' as Things really are, mail gain his proper End ; all Dif- " appointment proceeding from afting as Things are not : ** juft as, in reafoning from true or falfe Principles, the " Conclufion mull be neceffarily right or wrong. But ** gaining the proper End of afting, is Utility or Happinefs ; " Difappointment of That End, Hurt or Mifery. If, then, ** Truth produce Utility, the other Part of the Proportion, *' that Utility indicates Truth, follows neceiTarily. For, ** not to follow, fuppofes two different Kinds of general ** Utility relative to the fame Creature ; one proceeding *f from Truth, the other from Falfliood ; which is impofli- " ble, Se(3:. 3» Preliminary Difcoin-fe. ^^ Secondly, The Brevity or Shortnefs of Human Life makes it reafonable to think, Man is de- figned for a future State of Exiflence, after the prefent. The Force of which Argument arifes from a Joint-confideration of the Nature and Excellency of Man's IntelieBual and Rational Fa- cultieSy and the ^'ime allowed him for the Ufe and Enjoyment of them in this World. I need not enlarge on the Excellency and Per- fe8iom of the Human Underftanding, Reafon, Judgment, and the like. We experience them in ourfelves, in Proportion to That Share of them, God and Nature have beftowed on us ^ and we fee them, in others of our Fellow-crea- tures, in their beneficial Effeds and Confe- quences. So excellent, indeed, are the Mental Abilities of the Creature Man^ that they mud have been a principal Ground of That Account Mofes gives of his Creation : So God created Man in his own Image ; in the Image of God created he him. Gen. i. 27. But, alas ! how fhort^ how very fiiorr, a 27;;7« has the Providence of God allotted us for the Ufe ar^d Enjoyment of thefe Godlike Perfec- tions ! The Limiits of our mortal Duration, Ex- ♦' ble, becaufe the Natures of thofe Utilities maft then be " different ; that is, one of them muft, at the fame time, be, " and not be, Utility. Wherever, then, we lind general U~ •' tility, we may certainly know it for the Produce of Truth, " which it indicates." Div. Leg. V. 2. p. 247. 3 perience 46 Freliminary Difcoiirfe. Sed. ^. perience fnews us, may be fixed at, or near, the Period of fotirfcore 2"enrs, Multitudes, in- deed, never arrive at That Term, and Ibme few exceed it. However, for Argument's fake, we will fuppofe a Man, at the Time of his Death, to have feen four/core annual Revolutions of the Sun. Of thefe eighty Yt^iVs, One Fourth, atieaft, pafles, before his Reafon and Judgment come to Maturity ; and One Thirds before he has ac- quired a competent Knowledge of Hmifelf and the World about him. At which Period, and not before, he begins, properly Ipeaking, to live the Life of a Man, an intelligent, reafoning, Beino". There remain, then, not more than about fifty-three Years, during which he can fully enjoy the glorious and delightful Privilege oi Rationality in this World. Nor can we allow even this Advantage to All, who arrive at the Age of fourfcore Years. For, though, in fome aged Perfons, the Faculties of their Minds con- tinue ftron? and vio-orous to near the End of their Lives -, in many, they begin to decay much fooner, and terminate, a confiderable Time be- fore Death, in great intellerfual IVeaknefs, and, fometimes, a fecond Childhood itfelf. Which re- duces the Rational Life of fuch Perfons to little more than Half the Length oi l\\tv: Animal Life. From which, if we dedu6l One Third, or there- about, of Man's Life, for the Hours oi Sleep, in which, however the Faculty of Thinking may continue Se6l. 3. Preliminary Difcourfe. aj Gontinne aftive and in Motion, thofe of Reafon and Judgment (the Faculties, which dillinguiOi Man from the reft of the Animal Creation) are fufpended and laid afleep with the Body ; the Remainder we fhall find to be lefs than thirty Years. However, to make the beft of our Cal- culation, let us fuppole forty Years to be the Meafure of our Rational Life m this World. And, Is this fmall, this very frnall, Number oi Tears the whole Extent of Duration, for which Man, an intelligent and rational Being, was created to live and ad as fuch ? Are the noble, the Godlike, Powers of Underftanding, Reafon, and Judgment, beftowed o.n him, to be exercifed (rightly exercifed) for no longer a Time th^n forty annual Revolutions of the Sun .? How immenfely difproportionate the Shortnefs of this Period to the Excellency of thofe Powers ! We have fcarce found and felt ourfelves to be reafonable Crea- tures, and began to tafte the Delights, and reap the Advantages, flowing from the right Ufc of our Mental Abilities, before we are come within Sight (as it were) of That Hour, which muft put a Stop to all farther Ufe of them in this World. This, were there no future State of Man's Exif- tence, no Life to come, has the Appearance of being fo hard a Cafe, and fo inconfiftent with our Ideas of infinite Wifdom and Goodnefs, that we cannot well fuppofe it to be the Cafe, It is much more reafonable, and agreeable to our 3 Noticns 48 Preliminary Difcourfe. Sedt. 3* Notions of an all-wife and good Creator, to fup- pofe, that the Soul, in which the Powers of Un- derftanding, Reafon, and Judgment, refide, will furvive the Death of the Body, and continue to exercife its Spiritual and Intelledlual Faculties, for a Length of Time, or Extent of Duration, fropcrtionate to their Excellency and Perfedion. This Argument, from the Shortnefs of Human Life, receives additional Strength, when confi- dered with Refpecft to the Acquifition of Science. We come much earlier to the perfedt Ufe of our Mental Faculties, than to the PoffefTion of That Knowledge we acquire by them. Whatever Science or Sciences be the Objefl of our Pur- fuit, the Acquifition thereof exhaufts fo much of our Time, as to leave us but little for the Enjoyment of our acquired Kiwwledge. We lliall fee the Truth of this Obfervation, if we re- colled, how many Years are commonly fpent in acquiring a competent Skill in Jurifprudence, Medicine, 'Theology, Mathematics, or Natural Phi- lofophy — fo many, that the Student is ufually pretty far advanced in Life, by the Time that he has attained to the Charader of an able Lawyer, Phyfician, Divine, Mathematician, or Na- turalijl. And, does it feem reafonable, that our Perfedion in fuch Knowledge and the End of our Being fhould (I had almoft faid coincide, but may truly fay) approach lb near to each other, that the finiJJiing of our Studies brings us almoil to Sedl. 3. Preliminary Difcoiirfi. 49 the Verge of our Exijlence ? No. We cannot but conclude, from the apparent Marks of divine Wifdom in every P^rt of the Creation, that God has provided for the Soul of Man another State of Being, in which the Enjoyment of its ac- quired Knowledge (particularly, its Infight into the Ways and Works of God) will be continued to it for Ages to come. And we fhall fee the greater Reafon for this Conclufion, when we refleft, that the Pkafure, we feel in the Acqui- fition of Knowledge^ encreafes as That encreafes, and is at its Height when That is fo \ and there- fore, were there no Future State^ Man muft be fuppofed to receive moji Pleafure from the Pof- feffion of Knowledge, when he is yiearejl tht:; Time of his lofing That Knowledge for ever. A Suppofition, not very confonant to Reafon, and our Ideas of the Divine Wifdom and Good- nefs. To flrengthen this Argument (till more, let me add, that the Mind of Man is undoubtedly capable of vcjily more Knowledge^ than ever did,, or can, fall to the Share of the moft compre- henfive and enlightened Underifanding upon Earth. The Sciences^ in particular, v/hich are Gonverfant about Natural and Divijie Things, know no Bounds ; and v/e might continue our Puriuit of them, with frefli Improvement, and new Difcoveries, through many Ages. And, muft we iiop fo very fiiort in the Career oi Sci- E cnce ? 50 Preliminary Difcourfe. Secft. ^, ence ? Muft the SciiVs, 'vajl Capacity of Knowledge (little inferior, perhaps, to That oi Angels them- felves) receive no niore of it, than That fcanty Meafure fhe is able to acquire in this World ? Shall fne never emerge from thofe Clouds of Doubt and Uncertainty, which obfcure her Pro- fped, and retard her Progrefs in the Knowledge of God and of Nature ? Surely, God, who made nothing in vain, muft have appointed iomt fu- ture State ^ in which the Soul fhall go on im- proving in Science, till fhe arrives at all That Knowledge, her Faculties are capable of receiv- ing. Lastly, A future State oi Rewards z.nd. Pu- 7i:f}iments may be proved, even to Demonjlration itfelf, from That unequal Diftribution of Good and Evily we cannot but obferve in the State and Condition of Mankind in this World. This brings under our Confideration the not-uncom- mon Cafes of dijireffed Virtue and profperous IVickednefs, When bad Men fuffer Affliction, no one thinks of complaining, or of appealing to the Juftice of the Almighty in their Behalf. They are con- fidered as fufferingy^y?;^', and receiving the due Reward of their evil Deeds. But, when Af- fliction falls to the Lot of good Men, it is very na- tural to intereft the Divine Juftice in their Fa- vour, and to call upon That righteous Attribute of ^e6t. 3. PreH?ninary Difcoiirfe. 51 of the Deity for a fuitable Compenfation, a Re- compence of Good fufncient to overbalance the Evils they endure. The Sufferings of good Men are among the moll common Occurrences of Pluinan Life. Hiftory and Experience prefent us with nuni- berlefs Examples of Innocence dijirejfdd, and Virtue labouring under the word of Temporal Evils, in this Cafe, it is plain the Sufferer is tindeferving of the Afili6tion he endures. For Dijlrefs can never be the proper Recompence of^Firine, nor ^ffii£Iion the fuitable Reward of Innocence. It is true, we can fcarce fuppofe any Man fo per- fectly unbiameable in the Condudl of his Life, as to deferve no Share of worldly Evil. But we may eafily fuppofe a Man affiiftcd beyond his De- merits^ and fuffenng more of Worldly Evil, than his Moral Chara6ler renders \i\iT\ yufily obnoxious to. And it is this Cafe, which interefts the Di-; vme Jujiice in Favour of the Sufferer, and calls for a proper and fuiticient Recompence of his Suiferinss. This Exercife of the Divine Jujiice does, in- deed, fomctimes, take Place in this World. We fee Inilances, not a few, of good Men abun- dantly rewarded for the Evils they have unde- fervediy fuffered •, emerging from the dark Cloud of Adverfity, in which they had been involved, into the Sunfhine of greater Profperity than they E 2 ' had 52 Prelimhiary Difcourfe, Sedl. 3. had ever enjoyed '. In which Cafe, the Sufferer has evidently no Demand on the Jujiice of the Almighty for a future Recompence in another Xiife, on the Score of his Sufferings^ having al- ready received all that is juftly due to him on that Account. The Demand in queflion arifes from thofe Suf- ferings of good Men, for v/hich they receive no Recompence in this Life. In which Cafe, were there 710 Future State^ fuch Sufferers would re- ceive no Recompence at all ; and, confequently, God would not be a jull and righteous Gover- nor of the World. An impoffible Suppofition ! I'he Judge of all the Earth cannot but do right. Gen. xviii. 25. And therefore, as certainly as there is a God of infinite Juflice and Righteouf- nefs, fo certainly is there a future State of Re- tribution ; in which the unmerited Su?ie.nngs of o-ci'iMen in this World fiiall be more than com- o » The Cafe of Job (fuppofing it a FaSl^ and not a Moral FiSilon only) is a Cafe in Point. For, after as fevere Trials, as ever patient Virtue was put to, we find That good Man (That perfect and upright Man, one that feared God, and efchenved E-vil) delivered iVom cheni all, and the Lord hlejfiig his latter End more than his Beginning, doubling his PofTelTi- ons, and re/cring his Family ■ after which he lived prof- perous and happy, an hutidred and forty Tears, faiv his Sons and his Son; Sons, ewn four Generations, aiid defcended to the Grave in Peace, being old and full of Days. Job i. 8. xlii : X. 17. 5 pcni^ued Sed:. 3. Prelimmary Difcourfe, ^3 penfated by the inexpreflible Enjoyments of a better. In this Argument, the natural Tendency of Virtue to produce Happinefs is by no means de- nied. We allow it to be produflive of That Happinefs, which arifes from Health of Body and Peace of Mind -, and, confequently, that a virtuous and good Man, be his worldly Afflic- tions never lb great, cannot be completely mife- rable. But we reje(5l with Difdain the abfurd Doflrine of the Stoics and Epicureans^ tliat " no- thing can ever difturb the Quiet of a wife or good Man, who governs his Paflions, is con- llant and fearlefs, without Grief or Joy, and without Defire * " that " it is in the Power of the Soul to maintain her own Peace and Tran- quillity, and to conceive Pain to be no Evil ; all Judgment, Intention, Defire, and Aver- fion, being izithin the Soul, to which no Evil can afcend ^ ;" nay (which is ftill more flrange) that " a wife or good Man will take Pleafure in ^ being burned or tortured, and, even in Pha- ' /^m's Bull, cry out, how fweet this is ! how ' unaffeded I am with it ^ \ " Were this really ^ Cic. Tufc. Difp. 1. 5. c. 16. 3 Marci Antonini Imperatoris earum qute ad fdpfum Libri yM. Oxon. 1704. 1. 8. c. 28. 4 Cic. Tiifc. Difp. 1. 2. c. 7. E 3 tl^? 54 Freliminary Difcaurfe. Sed:. 3. the Cafe, did the being wife and virtuous raife us above all Senfe and Feelinor of the Miferies of Life •, no Argument, I confefs, could be drawn, from the Sufferings of good Men, for a future State of Recompence •, Virtue., in this Cafe, being, indeed, its civn proper and fufiicient Reward. But Nature and Common Senfe revolt againft this Philofophy. The Stoic or Epicurean Wife Man is a mere Creature of the Imagination. There never exifted in the World a Man " with- ^'' out Fear, Grief, Joy, or Defire ; " nor is it poffible " the Soul fhould conceive Pain " to be no Evil," or be inacceffible to all Kinds of Difquietude and Uneafmefs. And, as to the Notion of a wife Man's " taking Pleafure " or exulting in Pain or Mifery of any Sort, it is fa repugnant to the common Feelings of Human Nature, it muft be confidcred as an extravagant Rant, or the Dictate of a PhilGfopky run nmd. No. In fpight of the mofl; confummate Virtue, v/e muft be fenfible of Pain, whether of Body or Mind. Virtue may, indeed, infpire us with a Degree of Patience., and thereby take off froni the Weight of Temporal Evil. But, how does (he produce this Effccl .? Not by a Difplay of her ov/n native Charms, but by fetting before us the Motives oi Religion, the Duty of Submif- fio:-^ Se(5t. 3. Preliminary Difcourfe. ^^ fion to the Will of God, and the Profpeft of our future Reward in Heaven ^ Nor does this RefpU unto the Recompence of the Reward (Heb. xi. 26.) detract in the lead from the Merit of Virtue^ or the W^fdom of God in promifing to reward it, as a noble IVriter pre- tends it does *. For, it is impoffible to en- gage i St. Paul, who perfetlly underflood, and had a thorough Contempt for, the Greek Philofophy, declared, concerning Z/zOT/f^'an-dhisFellow-Chriftians, that, if in this Life ojzh they had Hope in Chriji, they '^juere of all Me?2 moft miferable, l Cor. XV. 19. i. e. that, without the Hope or Expeftation g^ ^x fu- ture State of Happinefs, the poor fulFering, perfecuted, Chriiiians would have been the wretchedeft of all Human Beings plainly enough condemning the Stoical Rant, that Virtue is its ovm Reivard, •5 *' I have known a Building" (fays Lord Shaftfbiiry) *' which by the Oflicioufnefs of the Workmen has been fo *' Jhored a.ndfcreiucd up, on the Side v/here they pretended it *• had a Leaning, that it has at lad: been turned the <* contrary Way, and overthrown. There has fome- ^' thing, perhaps, of this Kind happened in Mori^/f. Men. ** have not been contented to {hew the natural Advantages ** of Honefty and Virtue. They have rather leffened thefe, *' the better, as they thought, to advance another Founda- " tion. They have made Virtue io mercenary a Thing, and ^' have talked fo much of its Reujards, that one can hardly *' tell what there is in it after all, which can be worth *' rewarding. For to be bribed only or terrified into an <' honeft Praftice, befpeaks little of real Honeily or Worth. •' We may make, it's true, v/hatever Bargain we think fit, " and may bellow /;/ fi'vour what Overplus we will. But *' there can be no Excellence or IVifdom in voluntarily re- E 4 " warding 56 Preliminary Difcourfe. Se6l'. 3. gage in the Prague of Virtue, without perceiv- ing its natural Beauty and Excellence, and ac- quiring That Lew of itj^in which its true Merit confifts i and it is to Virtue, both in Habit and J5l^ that the Rewards of the Gcypd"/ properly be- long. And, can there be a greater or more be- neficial Exercife of the Divine JVifdom, than That oi Jlrengthening the natural Obligations to Virtue and Religion by fuchSandlions oi Reward and Punifnment, as fhall moft effeftually influence Mankind to the Pradice of Moral and Religious Duties. But, to proceed : As the Cafe of dijirejfed Vir-. tue demonftrates a future State of Reward^ fo does That of profperoiis TVickednefs a future State of Piinijliment. This latter is as common a Cafe as the former. Vv'e daily fee very had Men blef- fed with every Circumilonce of Worldly Profpe- rity, and pafling their whole Lives, not only without any apparent Marks of the Divine Dif- pleafure againft them, but with every Token of the Divine Favour extended towards them. That there is fomcthing, in this Cafe, upon the firft Viev/ of it, a little fliocking to Human Reafon, and feemingly not eafy to be reconciled «' warding vyhat is neither ellimnble nor deferving. And if " Virtue be not really eftimable in itfelf, I can fee nothing ♦■* ellimablc in following it for the fake of a Bargain.''^ Charadcrijlics, ScQ. Ed. 1749. Vol. I. p. 66. with Sedl. 3. Preliminary 'Difcowfe. ^y with the Jtijlice of God, as Governor of the World, is evident from hence, that infpired Writers themfelves have not only complained of it, but expoftulated with Providence concerning it. Wherefore (fays holy Job) do the ivtcked live, become old, yea are mighty in Power ? "Their Seed is ejlablijiied in their Sight zvith them., and their Off- spring before their Eyes. Their Hotifes are fafe from Fear^ neither is the Rod of God upon them. Their Bull gender eth, and faileth not -, their Cow calveth, and cajleth not her Calf. They fend forth their little ones like a Flock, and their Children dance. They take the Tiinbrel, and rejoice at the Sound of the Organ. They fpend their Days in Wealth, and in a Moment go down to the Grave. Job xxi. 7 — 1 3. The Royal Ffnhnift fays : / was envious at the foolifJi, when I favj the Profperity of the wicked. For there are no Bands in their Death, but their Strength is frm. They are not in Trouble as other Men j neither are they plagued like other Men-— Their Eyes fiand out with Fatncfs ; they have more than Heart could wifJi — Behold^ thefe are the Un- godly, who profper in the World ; they increafe in Riches. Pfal. Ixxiii. 3 — 12. So aifo the Prophet J^r^w/^^5 with great Boldnefs of Speech : Righteous (irt thou, O Lord, when I plead with thee -, yet let me talk with thee of thy Judgments. Wherefore doth the Way of the wicked profper ? Wherefore are fll they happy that deal very treacheroufy ? Thou hr.fi planted them ; yea, they have taken Root ; they 58 Frelminary Difcourfe, Sedl. 3. they grew ; yea, they bring forth Fruit. Jer. xii. I, 2. Thefe lacred Writers have delcribed the Cafe of profperous PVickednefs in the livelieit Colours. Bur, how do they remove the Difficulty attend- ing it ? How do they vindicate the Jujiice of God in fuiFering the wicked to profper ? Only, by aliedging, that their Prolperity is often fol- lowed by Adverfity, and that Divine Vengeance frequently overtakes them in this World. Thus Job : Hozv often is the Candle of the wicked put out, end how oft cometh their Defruclicn upon them / yob xx\. 17. And the Pfahmjl : When I thought to knew this, it was too painful for me : until I went into the Sanctuary of God •, then underflood I their End : furely thou did/} fet them in flippery Places ; thou cafiedfi them down into Defiru^ion. Pfal. Ixxiii. 16 — 18. And Jeremiah, by Way of Call upon the Juftice of the Almiglity : Pull them out like Sheep for the Slaughter, and prepare ihemfor the Day of Slaughter. Jer. xii. 3. But this is, evidently, no Vindication of the Divinejuftice, •with Refpeft to thole Inftances of profperous Wickednefs, which are not followed by the Di- vine Vengeance in this World. We muft, there- fore, look farther for fuch Vindication ^. And ■J It may be thought {Irange, that ht/pirtd Writers Hiould be at a Lofs for the true Solution of a Difficulty, raifed by thcmfelves. But we are to confider, that the Penmen of the QU Tejlament wrote under a Difpenfa,tion of Religion, whofe 5 Sanfi-ious. :Se6l. 3. Preliminary Difcoiirfe. 59 And, Where fhall we find it, but in the Doc- trine of a Life to come, a future State of final and unalterable Retribution ? There the Jiiflice of God will moft certainly take Place, , and a Punifiimcnt, adequate to their Guilt, be inflid- ed on the ■prcfpercus Wicked-, a Punifhment, which, by its Intenfenefs and Duration, will more, much more, than compenfate for the greateft Worldly Profperity, and the longeft Temporal Impunity. And thus will the Divine Juftice vindicate itfelf in the final Punifnment of the wicked and ungodly in the World to come ^ Upon Sanaions of Reward and PunKhment were merely Tempcral, And this naturally led them to c6nfider the Cafe of projpe- reus V/ichdncfs with a View only to the State of Things in this World. In which Light, it mull be confeiTed, it is no eafy Matter to reconcile That Cafe with the Divine Attribute oi Juftice. Nor are we to wonder, that the Spirit of God did not direft them to the true Solution of the Difficulty, fince the Time was not yet arrived for That full, clear, and ex- prefs Revelation cf a future State of Re-zvards and Pimijh- ments, which was to be the diilinguilhing Charaderiftic of the Chrijlian Difpeufaiion, and which alone clears up all DifHcuky in the preient Cafe. 8 This may ferve as a full Vindication of the Divine Juftice, but not fo of tlie Divine Wijdom, in fullering the wicked to profper and go unpunifhed in this World. For it may ftill be aflced : Vs^hy does God, at any Time, deal thus with the Wicked? What wife Ends of his Providence are anfwered by the Impunity and Profperity of bad Men ? This Queflicn receives a full and fatisfaftory Anfwer from our- Saviour's well-kno^,vn Parable cf the Tares, Mauh. xiii. For, ^a. Preliminary T>ifcoiirfe» Se<5l. 3. Upon the whole, and to bring the two Cafes of dijlrejl Virtue and prcfperous Wickednefs under one general Argument : That God is the Governor of the Morale as well as the NattirrJ, World — That the Govern- ment of reafonable Creatures confifcs, not barely in giving them Laws for the Diredion of their Moral Conduft, but in fecuring, as far as may- be, their Obedience to thofe Laws, by the Sanc- tion oi Rewards and Puni/Jnnents — That, by giving us Reafofij or a Faculty of diftinguifning between For, ibe Ser-vanfs of the HoufioUcr having propofed to extir- pate That noxious Weed, growing in the fame Field with a Crop of Wheal, the Mafter rejefts their Counfel, for this Reafon, leji ivhih they gathered up theTares, they Ihoald root up alfo the Wheat ivith them, v. 28 — 30. He confidered, that the Tares could not eafily be difengaged from the Wheat, among which they grew, without occafioning theDeflruftion of the latter at the fame Time. Thus good and bad Men live together in this World ; and fuch are their Social Connexions, that it is hardly poffible, a wicked Man fliould be diftreffed or ruined, without involving fome innocent Perfon or Perfons in the fame Diilrefs or Ruin with himfelf. This is, particu- larly, the Cafe with That Connection, v/hich arifes from the Tye of Blood. A wicked Parent cannot fuffer Adverfity or tlie Lofs of this Vv''orld's Goods (and fuch is the Te?nporal Punijhment cf bad Men, pointed out by the Parable, under the Image of rco//«'^ z^/^ without greatly diftrelTing and in- juring the worldly Ellate cf his guiltlefs Children and De- fcendents. Here we fee a very good Reafon, Why the Pro- vidence cf God often fpares the wicked in this World. It is for the fake of thofe, who, tho' no Sharers with them in their Quilt, muft be great SalFerers by their Pufujhrnent. Fight; Se6l. 3. Preliminary Difcoiirfe. %i Right and Wrong, Moral Good and Moral Evil, God has, in Effedl, given us Laws for the Go- vernment of our Moral Conduft — and. That the Jullice of God obliges him, by fome Mean? or other, and at fome Time or other, to reward our Obedience, or punifli our Difobedience, to the Laws of Reafon and Nature — Thefe are unqueftionable Truths of Natural Religion, or That Knowledge of God and our Duty we may acquire by the due Exercife of our Rational Faculties. Now, it mufh be confefled, that w^e difcover, in the Moral "World, manifefl Traces of a go- 'verning Providence^ exercifed for the Rev/ard of Virtue and the Punifliment of W^ickednefs. When all Things work together for good to them that love God (Rom. viii. 28.) v/hen good Men profper in the World, beyond their reaionable Hopes and Expedlations ; do we not plainly fee the Hand of God, interpofing to crown their Endeavours with Succefs '^. And, when all Things work together for evil to them that difobey God ; Avhen bad Men find their bell-laid Schemes for the Attainment of Worldly Profperity perpetu- ally difappointed, and Calamity overtaking them in all their Ways ; do we not as clearly fee the Interpoficion of an avenging Providence, blaft- ing all their Defigns, and fixing them down to a State of inevitable Advcrfity ? With Refpe6l to the Punifliment of the wicked in this World j Providence 62 preliminary Difcoiirfe. Sedt. 3. Providence feems to alarm us from Time to Time, and demand our Attention to its Work- ings, by luch Inftances of Calamity following plofe on the Pleels of Guilt, as leave us no Room to afcribe the Evil befalling the Guilty to any Thing but the Wrath of God, and an im- mediate Exercife of his Divine Jullice towards notorious Sinners '. 9 Such an Inftance we had, a few Years fince, at the Town ofDe'vizes in Wiltjhire ; where a Memorial of it, written on a Table, is placed over the Door of the Market-houfe. The Story (if I remember it right) is this. A Country-woman, beino- called upon to pay for a Sack of Wheat ilie had bar- gained for, affirmed fhe had already given the Money, and, to confirm the Truth of what flie faid, wiflied flie might drop down dead That Moment, if (he had not. And no fooner were the Words out of her Mouth, than fiie atlually fell down dead in the Prefence of many Spedlators j and the Mo- ney was found in her Pocket. A more recent Inftance of this Kind happened at Chalford in Gloucejlerfmre ; where one Richard Parfons playing at Whiji with three others, a Difpute arofs about the State of the Game. Par/ons fwore he and his Partner wereyfjr^ which the others denied : whereupon he wilhed, " Ke might never " enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, and that his Fielh " might rot upon his Bones, if they were not." Accord- ino-lv, That very Evei.ing, he felt an unufual Pain in hi^ Leo-, which encreafed till a Mortification came on, which fnread over his whole Body ; and in two or three Days he died. If fuch E?;^/ and unalterable Reward of tlie Righteous, and PmiJIi- ment of the Wicked. I am aware, that Writers hav^e endeavoured to overthrow this great Argument for a Future State^ by denying the FaB of an unequal Diftribution of Good and Evil in this World. This is the View of the Fourth Book of Mr. Pope's celebrated Ef 64 Preliminary Difcourfi. Secfl. 3«' fay on Man : Of which the late Lord Bolinghroke Ipeaking, in a Letter to Dr. Swift, fays : " It *' is a noble Subjcd: : he pleads the Caufe of God " (I ufe Seneca's ExprefTion) againft that famous *' Charge, which Atheifcs in all Ages have " brought, the fuppofed unequal Dlfpenfations " of Providence ; a Charge, which I cannot *' heartily forgive your Divines for admitting^ " You admit it indeed for an extreme good Pur- *' pofe, and you build on this Admifiion the " Ncceflity of a future State of Rewards and *' PuniQiments. But what if you fliould find, " that this future State will not account for " God's Juftice in the prcfent State, which you " give up, in Oppofition to the Atheilts ? Would " it not have been better to defend God's Juftice " in this World, againft thefe daring Men, by *' irrefragable Reafons, and to have refted the " other Point on Revelation*?" The grand Argument • Letters n,vritten hy Jonathan Swift, D. D. &c. 5th ed. Vol. 111. p. 41. The Reader will be pleafed with the fol- lowing "Note on the above PafTage of Lord Bolinghroke, by the ingenious Editor of the Letters, Dr. Ha-jjkef^vorth. " To " prove, that the Dlfpenfations of Pro\idence in the pre- *' fent State are not unequal, is certainly very defirable ; «' but there is Reafon to fear, that thofe, who blame Divines " for admitting an Inequality, have notfuccceded in the At- " tempt. Philofophcrs, antient and m.idern, v/ho have en- •« dcavoured to juRify the Ways of Gcd to ?vlan, by provii.g, «f that Happinefs does not confift in E.xternals, in order to * ' fuew Secfl. 3. Preliminary Difiourfe. 6$ Argument againft the Suppofition of an unequal Providence, with Relped to the particular Cafes of diftrejfed Virtue and triumphant Wkkedncfs, is This: That we are incompetent Judges of fuch Cafes — That the Perfons, whom we confider as undeferving of the Evils they fufFer, may have their /^fr^^ Vices or Immoralities, for which they thus fuffer at the Hand of God ; and that the Wicked, how profperous and happy foever in the Eyes of the World, may hefecretly punifhed with Difquietudes and Affliftions, unknown to " fhew, that his Difpenfations are equal, have yet placed " Happinefs in Virtue chiefly, as a principle of adive Be- " nevolence. " Happier as kinder in each dueDegree> " And Height of Blifs, but Height cf Charity." " Now there feems to be an Inconfillency between thefe •' two Principles, of which they are not aware. It may " reafonably be afked, what Virtue, as a Principle of Bene- •' volence, has to beftow ? Can it beftow upon others any " Thing more thari Externals ? If not, it cither has not the *' Power of communicating Happinefs, or Happinefs is to *' be communicated in Externals. If it has not the Power " of communicating Happinefs, it is indeed a mere Name; *' the Subjedl receives hothing, the Agent gives nothing. " The Blifs of Charity is founded on a Delufion ; on the " falfe Suppofition of aBeneht communicated by Externals, *' v^hich Externals cannot communicate. l£ Happinefs can " be communicated by Externals, and confequently is de- " pendent upon them, and thefe Externals are ijnequally •' diftributed, how is the Difpenfation of Providence, with/ -*' relpedt to Happinefs in the prefsnt State, equal?" F the 66 Preliminary Difcoiirfe. Se6l. 3. the World — In which Cafes, the Jiifllce of God Hands acquitted, with Refpedt to the Temporal Condition of BotTi. — It cannot be denied, that this may fometimes be the Cafe with what we are apt to call dijlrejl Virtue and triumphant Wicked- nefs. But, if it be not always the Cafe ; if there be Inftances, how few foever, of Perfons fliffer- ing unmerited Evils, or more of Temporal Evil than they deferve, and leaving the World with* out any Recompence of their Afflidtions ; if there be any wicked, diftinguifhed by almoft every BlelTing of Providence, without any confiderable Alloy of Temporal Evil -, if there be fuch Cafes (and, that there are, no one converfant with their Fellow-creatures will deny) there is fuch a Thing as an unequal Dijirihution of Good and Evil in this World, and the Argument, drawn from thence, for a future State of Rewards and PuniJIiments, retains its full Force. This Argument for a future State of Rewards and PunifJiments^ though fupplied by the Light of Reafon and Nature alone, is fo ftriftly con- clufive, we may venture to fubfcribe it, as the Mathematicians do the Proof of a Geometrical Propofitiony with Q^ . E . D . I fiiall conclude this Difcourfe with obferving the additional Strength, which the Phyjical Proof of an i'mnatcrial and naturally-immortal Principle ov Soul Sect. 3. Prelimnary Difcourfe, 67 Sout in Man, and the Moral Evidence of a Future State, mutually afford each other. If there certainly is an immaterial and natu- rally-immortal Principle or Soul in Man, That Prin- ciple or Soul mu^ furvive the Death of his Body. To fuppofe, it will not, is the Abfurdity of fup- pofing the Soul to be immortal and mortal at the fame Time ; or that God has conferred Immor- tality on the Creature Man, with a Defign to take it from him again. Bur, if there be a Part of Man (the principal Part) \\\\\ch. furvives the DifTolution of his Bodily Frame, there muft be a Future State of Man's Exiftence, or a Life to come in another World. On the other Hand, If it be morally certain^ that there is a Future State of Rewards and Pu- nifhments, prepared for Man in another World, he muft have an immaterial and naturally-immortal Principle or Soul. For, Death being the entire Deftrudlion of the Body, and neither Nature nor Reafon leading us to expe<5l any Reftoration of laife to the Dead, a Future State, without an im- mortal Soul, muft appear, to the Eye of Human Reafon, a Phyfical Impojfibility. F 2 D I S S E R. DISSERTATION I. O N T H E S TATE OF THE DEAD BETWEEN Peath and the Resurrection, F3 CONTENTS. SECTION I. A N Intermediate State of the Soul he- ^ -^ tween Death and the Refurre^ion, a general Bo^rine of the antient Chriftian Church. SECTION II. ^he commonly-received Opinion of the Sours imme- diate Tranjlation to Heaven or Hell, inconJifie?it with the Scripture-do^rines of the Jlefurred:ion and Judgment. SECTION III. Other Scripture-proofs of an Intermediate State. SECTION \V. Scriptures, which feem to exclude an Intermediate State, con/idered. SECTION V. flow the antient Do^rine came to he laid afide» SECTION VI. 4n Enquiry Into the Place of departed Souls. F 4 SEC-- CONTENTS. SECTION VII. An Enquiry into the State of the departed Soul, with RefpeB to Knowledge, and with RefpeU to Happiness or Misery. SECTION VIII, Objections anfwered. POSTSCRIPT. 'ithe DoBrine of an Intermediate State maintained hy Writers of the firji Diftin^ion in the Church of England. D I S- DISSERTATION I. O N The State of the Dead between Death and the Resurrection. IT being demonftrable, by the Light of Reafon and Nature alone, that Man is a Creature compounded of two diftindl and fepa- rable Parts, a Body and a Soul ; the former a material^ the latter a fpiritual or immaterial Sub- fiance •, and that the Soul naturally furvives the Difiblution or Death of the Body^ and continues to exift, a livings confcious^ Being, in another State * : It being likewife certain, from the Chrif- tian Revelation^ that a Time will come, when the Body fhall be raifed from the dead, and re- united with the Soul, in order to conftitute the fame individual Creature that lived upon the Earth : Hence arifes this Queftion, What is the State of the Dead, during the Separation between the5oiy and the Soul, or in the Interval of Time between Death and the Refurre5lion ? It is univerfally agreed, that the Body, durino- the whole of That Pei:iod, continues in a StatQ * SeelNTROD.SECT.il, of 74 Dissertation I. Scd. i, of a.h{o\me InfenJiHlify or perfe^ Death: nor can it poffibly be otherwife, when its Organs of Sen- fation are entirely deftroyed, and the very Mat- ter^ of which it is compofed, refolved into the Mafs of Earth, or Dujl^ out of which it was ta- ken. Gen. iii. 19. The Queftion, therefore, is confined to the 5tate of the ^ouly after its Sepa- ration from, and before its Re-union with, thq Body, SECTION I. An INTERMEDIATE State of the Soul, between Death and the RefurreBion, a general Do^rine of the antient Chriftian Church. IT appears, both from the Writings and the common Difcourfe of Chriflians, that the ge- neral Opinion is. That the Soul of Man, upon its Separation from the Body, palTes direUly to its final State of RetrihiUion^ in Heaven or Hell. In mofb, if not all, of the praMical Difcourfes on the Subjed oi Death and a Futurfi State, we find this taken for granted to be the Cafe with our Departure out of this World ; apd., when we; hear of the Death of an eminently gopci, or no- torioufly wicked, Perfon, we ufually exprefs our Perfuafion, that he is gone to receive the juft Recompence of his good or evil Deeds, in the I Place Sed. I. Btate of the Dead, 75 Place of Happinefs or Mifer)\ prepared for his everlajling Reception. Neverthelefs, it is certain, that the antient Chriftian Church, for fome Centuries, held a dif- ferent Opinion •, and taught, that the Soul, upon its Separation from the Body, is not tranflated immediately to Hempen or Hell, but pafles the In- terval between Death and the RefurreBion in fonic intermediate Place, which is neither Heaven nor Hell This I fhall fhew from the Authority of four of the moil eminent Fathers of the fecond and third Centuries. According to Jujiin Martyr, " They, who fay, " there is no Refurreftion of the dead, but that " their Souls, immediately after Death, are re- " ceived into Heaven, are not to be looked " upon as Chriftians '." Jujiin plainly fuppofes a neceflary Connexion between the RefurreSlion and an intermediate State-, and it is certain, that all the Heretics, who denied the Refurre^ion, de- nied alfo the intermediate State. Jrenaus reafons from the Example of Chriji, " As our Lord " (fays he) " after his Death, '' went to the Place of departed Souls, then rofe " bodily, and after his Refurredion was taken " up into Heaven •, fo the Souls of his Difciples, *' for whofe fake thefe Things were done, will .^* go to the invifible Place prepared for them 3 Dial, cum Tryph. p. 30^'. « by jb Dissertation I. Sed. i. *' by God, where they will continue till the " Refurredion ; when, receiving again their " Bodies, and perfedly, that is bodily, rifing *' from the dead, as our Lord did, will thus *' come to God *." Tertullmn ufes the very fame Argument, to eftablifh the fame Do6lrine •, and adds : " Hea- ** ven is open to no Man, fo long as this World " lads : but when That fhall be pafTed away, " the Gates of the Kingdom of Heaven Ihall " be unlocked ^ *' And elfewhere he fays : " When we fpeak of Paradife as the delightful " Receptacle of the Souls of the righteous, we " do not mean by it Heaven ^" Lailly, Origen thus exprefles himfelf : " Even ** the Apoftles themfelves are not yet com- " pletely happy, but wait till even I am quali- " fied to be Partaker of their Blifs." Here he refers to the Authority of St. Paul ', and goes on : " You fee then, that Abraham ftill waits *' for the Attainment of what is perfed : So " alfo Ifaac and Jacob and ail the Prophets wait " for Us, that with Us they may receive com- " plete Happinefs *.'* 4 Jdv. Haret. 1. i. c. 31. ^ De Anima. c. 55. * Jpologet. c. 47. 7 God having pro-oided fome better Thing for uSy theft thejt tvoithotit us Jhould not be made perfeSi. Heb. xi. 40. 8 Homil. in Le^wit. 7*™. I No^iing Se(fl. I. State of the Dead. jj Nothing can be clearer than the Senfe of thefe antient Fathers^ as to the State of the dead be- tween Death and the RefiirreBion. They plainly aflcrt, that the Soul is not received into Heaven till after its Re-union with the Body. Nor was this Do6trine confined to the three or four firll Cen- turies. The Greek and Latin Churches, for more than fourteen hundred Years, unanimoufly held, that " the Souls of the Saints were in ahditis re- " ceptaculis, or, as fome of them expreffed it, " in exteriorihus atriis, where .they expefled the " Refurredion of their Bodies, and the Glori- *' fication of their Souls •, and though the Fa- " thers believed all of them to be happy, yet " they did not think they would enjoy the Bea- " tific Vifion before the Refurrefbion '." It will be proper to obferve here, that this antient Doctrine of the intermediate State, though it feems to refpefb the Souls of the Righteous orjly, mull be extended to thofe of the Wicked like- wife i becaufe (as we Ihall prefcntly fee) the Rea- fons, upon which it is grounded, fcrve equally to prove, that the latter will not receive i!ac final Recompence of their evil Deeds till after the Refurreofion. How the Do6lrine of the intermediate Slats came to be laid afide, and That of the Soul's immediate Tranflation to Heaven or Hell to take- " Bp. Taylor's liber>v of Prophgcj.in*^'^. \z^z. itS' yS Dissertation I. Sedt.^* its Place, in the Chriftian World, -will be ac- counted for in the Sequel of this Dijfertation. In the mean Time, let us enquire into the Grounds and Reafons of the ant lent Do^rine. An En- quiry, which, I am perfuaded, will fatisfy us^ that the antient Chrijiians^ in believing an inter- mediate State of the Soul between Death and the Refurred-ion, had both Reafon and Scripture on their Side* SECTION II. I'he commonly-received Opinion of the SouPs imme- diate 'Tranjlation to Heaven or Hell, inconjijient with the Scripture-do^rines of the Refurreftion and Judgment. FIRST, then, the Suppofition of the Soul's immediate Tranjlation to Heaven or Hdl feems to be inconfiftent with the great Chriftian Doc- trine of the Refurre^ion. For, if That Spiritual Part of the Man be already placed in its final State of Retribution, of what Ufe is its Re-union with the Body ? The Reftirre^ion of the Body is certainly ap- pointed for fome wife Ends of Providence, re- fpcifting the future State of Man. What thofc Ends are, v/ill be one Subject of our Enquiry, in the next Dijjertation, At preient, it is fuffi- cient Sea:;.2. State of the Dead, 79 cient to obferve, that the Re-union of the Body with the Soul muft, naturally, produce fome Change in the Condition of the latter. The Souk without the Body, cannot reafonably be fuppofed to exift, enjoy, or fuffer, in the very fame Manner, as in Conjundion with it. But this manifeftly excludes the Suppofition of the Soul's immediate Paflage to Heaven or Hell ; it being incapable, in its difemlodied State, of thoie peculiar Senfations of Pleafure or Pain, Happi- Tiefs or Mifery, which are prepared for Man, as a Being compofed both of Matter and Sprit. This we fi^nd to have been the Opinion of That g-reat Chriftian Father St. Aujiin ; who juftly afl^s, with refpea to good Men , " Of what Advan- « ta^e is it to Souls, to receive again their Bo- «dies at the Refurreaion, if they are capal^le « of enjoying the fupreme Happinefs of Hea- . « ven even without their Bodies ' ?" But', may we not fuppofe the Soul received up into Heaven, and yet not admitted to the fu- preme Happinefs of That blcffed Place ? May we not fuppofe it aaually placed in That Region of Blifs, though not yet pofTeffed of That parti- cular &i or Degree of Happinefs, which will tol- low upon its Re-union with the Body .^ This is, indeed, the Opinion of many, who contend for the Soul's immediate "Tranflaticn to Heaven. Thus « Gin. ad lit. 1.12. the 8o Dissertation I. Sedl. 2. the learned Witfius : " It cannot be denied, that " there is a great Difference between that Mea- " lure of Happinefs, which the Souls of Be- *' lie vers enjoy, while they are feparated from " the Body, and that Confummation of Glo- " ry, which is to be revealed at the laft Day ; " and that becaule the Happinefs of a Part is " not to be compared with that of the Whole ; " fince even that Part, which is already re^ " ceived into Heaven^ has not attained to that " Perfe6tion, which the Gofpel has promifed, *' as we will prefently more fully Ihew." Here the Profefibr mentions the antient Opinion, par- ticularly That of Chryfojtom^ who calls the Place of departed Souls a Porch^ and Bernard, who calls it a Hall * ; and adds : " Which how- " ever is to be underflood with Caution, not *' that the Souls of Believers are out cf Heaven •, " But we are to think, that then they will ob- *' tain their mod perfeft Happinefs, when they " Ihall be re-united to their Bodies ^" I anfwer : This Suppofition manifeilly implies, that the Reivard of the Righteous, though not pe?'- fe^ed till after t!ie Refurreclion, w ill yet commence immediately after their Death. But this will prefently appear to be inconfiftent with another important Dodrine of holy Scripture. Befides * See Citation from Bp. Taylor, ubi fupra. 3 Qectnomy of the Covenants, &c.. Lor.d. 1763. ?. 762^ 763. that Sed. 2-. State of the Bead. 8i that it feems much more probable (and Probabi- lity is the higheft Degree of Evidence we can pretend to in this Cafe) that two fuch different States of Being, as thofe of the Soul in and out of the Body, (hould pafs in two different Regions of the Univerfe, than that they fliould belong to one and the fame Region. And this, I think, fuf- ficiently juftifies the ancient Chriftians in fup- pofing the Souls of the Righteous excluded from the Enjoyment of Heaven till after the Refur- re£iion. But this antient Opitiion is rendered ftill more reafonable and probable by the great Chriftian Doftrine of the fittal Judgment. For, at That folemn Seafon (the Scriptures tell us) the Judge of Mankind fhall feparate them one from another^ as a Shepherd divideth his Sheep from the Goats, and ffiall fet the Sheep on his right Hand, but the Goats on the left ; and fliall fay to the Righteous, Come, ye bleffed of my Father'-, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the Foundation of the World ; and to the Wicked, Depart from me, ye cur fed, into ever- lafling Fire, prepared for the Devil and his Angels, After which, Thefe (the Wicked) fhall go away into everlajling Funiflment, but the Righteous into Life eternal. Matth. xxv. ^i. ad fin. Now, fuppofing the Souls both of the Righ- teous and the Wicked already placed in a State of Retribution (and fo placed they, certainly, are, if in Heaven or Hell^ notwithftanding any Dif- G fcrence 82 Dissertation I. Se(fl. 2", ference of Degrees in the Rewards and Pimijli- ments of the Life to come) muft not the Judgment of Mankind appear to be, at lead, a fuperfluom and ufelefs TranfaClion ? For, Are not the Righ- teous and the Wicked already fufHciently fepa- rated one from another ? Are not the former al- ready in PoIFvfllon of the Kingdom prepared for them from the Foundation of the JVorld \ and the latter ^/r^^xiy plunged in the everbfiing Fire pre- pared for the Devil ojid his Angels ? Of what Ufe^ then, is the Judgment of Mankind by Jefus Chrijl ? "Why are the Righteous fentenced to a Reward already (in Part at leaft) bellowed on them, and the Wicked to a Punilliment already (in Part at leaft) inBided on them ? What is this, but a5lmn agere, a Repetition of what is already done ? What is it, but to fummon Mankind from Hea- 'ven and llell^ with no other View than That of fending them hack again to the Flace from whence they came ? Befides that, if we fuppofe the Soul to be in Heaven or Hell before the Day of Judg- ment, we invert the natural Order of thofe twa Things, the Decree and the Execution of Jufiice : We fuppofe fuch an u5"?gov 7rg6r?gcv, as would dif- arace the Adminiftration even of Human Gcvern- ments, and much lefs can (without Blafphemy, I was going to fay) be afcribed to the God of all Order and Regularity, or to any Exercife of his Providence in the Government of the Uni- verfe. In lliort, if Heaven and Hell be the pro- per. Sedl. 2. State of the Bead. 3 3 per, refpeftive, Seats of future Reward and Fu- mjliment^ the Human Soul cannot, confidently with the profefied Dengn of the general Judg- ment, and the natural Order of 'Things, be fent to the one or the other, 'till its Re-union v/ith the Bedy, at the general Refm're5iion ; at which Time, and not before, the Judgment of Man- kind, and their Deftination to Happmefs or Mi- fery, are reprefented as taking Place. This Argument, indeed, would be of little or no Weight, were there any Proof of (what fome fuppofe) 2i private ov particular Judgment o£ Individuals, immediately after Death •, in Confe- quence of which, they are fent direSlly to Heaven or Hell, the refpeftive Places of their final Re- ward orPunilhment. But Dr. Sherlock, who has fully confidered this Pretence, is fo far from thinking it capable of any Scripture-proof, that he pronounces it irreconcileable with the Scrip- ture-dodrine of the final Judgment. " I mud " confefs " (fays that pious and learned Writer) " this has always appeared a great Difficulty to " me : We live in fuch an inquifitive Age, as " will not allow us to affirm what we cannot prove *' — for my Part, I muft honeftly profefs, that " I neither dare affirm or deny this particular " Ji^dgment, in the Senfe in which it is com- *' monly underftood-, for there are fomePalTages " in Scripture, which feem to look both Ways *' —The Truth is, if all Men have a final Sen- G 2 " tence 84 DiSSfeRTATlON I. Sed. 2. *' tence paffed on them as foon as they go int6 " the other World, it is 'very iinac countable^ why " Chrift, at the laft Day, fhall come with fuch " a terrible Pomp and Solemnity to judge and " condemn thofe, who are judged, and con- " demned, and executed already, as much as " ever they can be ^" Now, furely, if there be no exprefs Mention, no pofitive Proof, in Scrip- ture, oi 3. particular Judgment oi Individuals, im- mediately confequent upon Death, and the Sup- pofition of fuch a previous, feparate. Judgment cannot be reconciled with the Scripture-dodlrine of the Jinal, general. Judgment ; we may venture to affirm, without Hefitation, that there is not, there cannot be, fuch a Judgment, We conclude, therefore, with La5fantius, that " Souls are not judged immediately after Death ; " but are All detained in one common Reccp- " tacle, till the Time come, when the great " Judge fhall enquire into their feveral Me- '* rits ^" And therefore the Argument from the Scripture -do6trine of the final Judgment, againft the Doftrine of the Soul's immediate Tranflation to Heaven or Hell, remains - in its full Force. '"^- ^ ♦ Pra^ical Difour/e concernht^ a Future Judgtnent, &C. Ch. ii. Se£t. I. i Injl, Di'V. 1. 7. c. 21, SEC- Sed. 3. State of the Bead. 85 SECTION III. Other Scripture-proofs of an Intermediate State. 'Tp H E antient "Doctrine of the Intermediate State •*• is farther proved by thofe Scriptures, which reprefent the Rewards and PunijJiments oi thtLife to come as dependent on, and ftihfeqiient to, the Re- furreBion and Judgment. For, if thofe great E- vents are the proper jEra, at which thofe Re- wards 2.nd Puni/Iiments commence, 'nothing can be plainer, than that the Interval between Death and the Refurre5lion is not the appointed Seafon of final Retribution ; and, confcquently, during That Interval, the Soul is not an Inhabitant either of Heaven or Hell. We have already feen, in our Saviour's De- fcription of the Judgment^ that the folemn Pro- ceedings of That tremendous AlTize will con- clude with the Departure of the Righteous and the Wicked to their refpedive Stations of Re- ward and Punifliment : Thefe fJiall go a'way into everlafiing Punifhment, but the Righteous itito Life eternal. Matth. xxv. 46. And with refpeft to the Refurre^lion, we fee the Reward of Chriflian Faith connefted with it by the fame divine Teacher : This is the Will of him that fent me^ that every one which feeth the Son, and believeth on him^ may have everlafiing Life j and I will raife G 3 him 86 Dissertation I. Secft. 3, him tip at the hjl Day. John vi. 40. Raife him up I For what ? Evidently, that he may have everlajting Life, as the Recompence of his Belief in the Son of God. The great Apoftle of the Gentiles declares the Day of Jud.^ment to be the Time, when Himfelf and all other good Chriftians fhall receive the Reward prepared for them. I have fought a good Fight, I have fini/I:ed my Courfe, I have kept the Faith : Henceforth there is laid up for me a Crown of Righteoufnefs, which the Lord the righteous Judge fliall give me at That Day, and not to me only, but unto all them alfo that love his appearing. 2 Tim. iv. 7, 8.. And the fame Apoftl-.^, exhorting the *J^heffalonians againft immoderate Grief for the dead, ufes this Argument : I would not have you he ignorant. Brethren, concerning them which are eifLeep, that ye forrow not even as others which have no Hope : For if we believe, that Jefus died, and rofe again, even fo them alfo which fleep in Jefus will God bring zvith him — JVhcrefcre comfort one another zvith thefe Words, i ThelT. iv. 13, 14, iS. "Would the Apoftle have fetched his 'Topic of Con- folation from the Profpefl of the Refiirre^ion, had the Souls of the deceafed been already in Pofteffion of That Happinefs, the Confideration of which was to moderate the Grief of their fur- viving Friends ? Bcfides that the Metaphor of Sleep, here ufcd to denote the State of de- ccaftd Chriftians bcfcrc the Refurre^ion, feems not Sed:. 3. ' Sfafe of the Bead. 87 not very applicable to the State of fuch as are admitted to the ftipreme H^.ppinefs of Heaven ; in the Enjoyment of which we mud fuppofe them to be tranfcendently awake, and to exert all the Powers of Thought and Intelled in full Perfec- tion. Again : Thofe Words of Paul to Timolhy — looking for ^hat hkjfed Hope^ and the appearing of the great God, and our Saviour Jefus Chrifi. Tit. ii. 13.''. — plainly imply, that the Chriflian's Hope or Expedation of his Reward in Heaven will not be crowned with Fruition till the Com- ing of Chrijl. And (to mentiqri no more) the fame Apoftle fixes the Time of a Chriftian's Glorification or Reception into Heaven to That of his Saviour's Return to judge the World, in That Declaration to the Colojfians^ When Chrijl^ who is our Life^ Jliall appear, then JJiall ye alfo ap" pear with hira in Glory. Col. iii. 4. Theie few Paflages of St. Paulas Epijlk.s, feleded from many more to the fame Purpofe, may fuf- fice to fhew That Apofiie's Senfe of the Matter, and that he was far enough from fuppofing, that the Soul, immediately on its Separation from the Body, pafies to its final State of Retribution. On the contrary, he plainly averts, that Chriftians muft wait till the fecondJdvent of their Redeemer, ^ Hope, IX'TriJ'a, is here ufsd to tx^rc^s the Thing hoped for ; the PafBon itfelf being denoted by the Word '7T^o7S'i- yjy.ivoi, locking far. G 4 before 88 Dissertation I. Sedl. 3. before they are put in Poireflion of That con- fummate Glory and Happinefs^ he has prepared in Heaven for them. I am aware, that thefe and the like Paffages of Scripture are ufed as an Argument againft any intermediate State oiLife and Confcioufnefs between Death and the Refurreftion, and, confequently, againft the very Being and Immortality of the Hu- man Soul 7. But it muft be obferved, that, in the Ufe here made of thefe Scriptures, the Be- ing and Immortality of the Soul are taken for granted, as antecedently proved ; and, upon this Foundation, the Scriptures in queftion abundantly prove what they are here alledged in Proof of. This Scripture-proof of an Intermediate State may be corroborated by the Accounts, given us in the New Tejlament^ of Perfons raifed from the dead by the Power of Chriji. It is evident from the facred Narrative, that Lazarus of Bethany^ whom our Lord reftored to Life, after having been dead four Days (John xi. I. &c.) was a good Man : Other wife Jefus would not have called him our Friend Lazarus. Nor is there any thing to perfuade us, that the Widow oi Nain^s Son (Lukevii. 11. &c. ), or Jairus's Daughter ( Luke viii. 49. &c. ), Both ■J See the appendix to Dr. Laiv's Conjiderations on the Theory of Religion, &c. p. 387 — 401. See alfo my Defence of the commonly-received Doiiritie of the Human Soul, $cc, Seft. I\'. raifec^ Sed. 3. State of the Dead. 89 raifed from the dead by our Saviour, were not good Perfons. And, if fo, according to the vulgar Notion, they were in PofTeffion of their final Reward. But is it reafonable to think, the henevolent Jefus would call them back, from a State of perfeSl Felicity, to their former Condi- tion in this World ? And, for What ? To dry the Tears of their afflidbed Relations and Friends ? ^hat a little Time would have done, without the Intervention of a Miracle. And, fhould it be alledged, that Miracles were neceflary to the Proof of our Saviour's Divine Miflion and Au- thority, and fuch as the Rejloration of Life to the dead peculiarly fit to be wrought by Him, who was Himfelf the Refurre£lion and the Life ( John xi. 25.) ; This may be granted ; but with this Referve, that the Miracle be not to the Hurt or Difadvantage of theFeri^onj on whom it is wrought. Such Miracles never were, nor ever could be, wrought by the gracious and merciful Saviour of the World. On the contrary, befides the Evi- dence arifmg from his mighty Works, every Mi- racle, our Saviour wrought on the Perfons of Men, redounded to their great Benefit and Ad- vantage. Witnefs the Miracles of reftoring Health to the fick. Sight to the blind. Strength to the impotent, and the like. But the Miracle of raiftng the dead would be an Exception to the beneficial Nature and Tendency of our Saviour's Ji'firaclesy if Lazarus of Bethany^ the Widow of ISlain^z 90 Dissertation I. Sed. 3. Nain's Son, and Jairus's Daughter, v/ere reftored to Life at the Expence of lofing, for a Time, a State of Happinefs infinitely greater than any this World can afford. It follows, therefore, that, at the Time of their Reftoration to Life, they were not in PofTefTion of their final Reward^ but exiftgd in fuch an intermediate State of ini' ferfe^ Happinefs, as might, for a fhort Time at leaft, be exchanged for their former Condition in this World, without any conGderable Injury done them, and even (the Providence of God fo ordering it) with ample Amends for the Difad- vantage of the Change. The fame Uie may be made of the Firfi Re- JurreEiion, prophecied of by St. Jchn (Rev. xx. 4 — 6.) That of the Martyrs, who fhall live and reign with Chrifi a thoufand Tears. For, how great foever we may fuppofe the Glory and Hap- pinefs of Chrijl's Millennial Kingdom will be, it muft fall (hort of the Glory and Happinefs of Heaven. And therefore, to call the Martyrs from Heaven, to partake of That Kingdom upon Earth, will be fo far from being (what it is cer- tainly intended to be) a Reward of their Sufferings for the fake of Chrifi, that it muft be to Them an adual Punifiment, by depriving them of the fti" preme Felicity of Heaven, and That for the long Term of a thoufand Tears, and degrading them to a much inferior and lefs perfe£i State of Hap- pinefs. From whence it is reafonable to con- clude. Seft. 4. State of the Dead. 91 elude, that the Chrifticn Martyrs will not attain to their great and glorious Reward in Heaven till after the Millennium^ that is, till after the Coming of Chrift, at the End of the World. SECTION ivr Scriptures, which feem to exclixle an intermediata-- State, confidered. BU T, What fhall we fay to thofe Scriptures, which feem plainly to exclude That interme- diate State of the dead, we have been contending for •, and reprefent the Rewards and Puni/hments oi Futurity as immediately confequent upon our Departure out of this Life ? To-day (faid our Saviour to the penitent Thief on the Crofs) thou Jlialt he with me in Paradife. Luke xxiii. 43. Does not this Promife im- ply the Thief's immediate Reception into the Manfions of the bleffed in Heaven? I anfwer: Our Saviour muft be fuppofed to have exprefied himfelf fo as to be perfedlly underftood by the Robber j and therefore the Meaning of the Pro- mife muft be determined by the Senfe, in which the Jews underftood the Word Paradife, Now That was, not Heaven, or the Place oi final Re- ward, but an intermediate Place or Receptacle of Souls ^2 Dissertation I. Se the Spirit ; for they reft from their Labours. * MrtH*'p/o/ 01 viK^n \v Ki/p<« a'to9 :'Ji(Tjtej'TSf, a.'Tra.frt ^iyii;yd.U TO Uvivy-cti Fid. Curcellai N. T. Obedience SedTi 4. State of the 'Dead. 97 " Obedience of Jefus Chrift, fince Death will '* place them out of the Reach of all Worldly " Evils, and of thofe Diftrefies, to which their " Chriftian Profeflion muft often expofe thenn." If it be objedled to this Interpretation, that there feems to be no Want of a Voice from Hea- ven to eftablifh fo plain a Truth, as that Death puts an End to all our Troubles -, and that xho. Bkf- fednefs of them which die in the Lord cannot be fuppofed to commence from the Date of this Voice from Heaven^ rather than from any other Period, good Chriftians being at all Times and in all Periods equally blefied ; we may have Recourfe to the Interpretation given us by the very learned and judicious Bp. Newton \ who is of Opinion, that " the Words from henceforth relate not {o " much to the Bleffednefs of the dead^ which is *' always the fame, as to the Writing and Pro- *' mulgation of this Do6trine byZz^/zJ'fr and the " Proteftant Reformers : " from which Time, *' though the Bleffednefs of the dead which die in " the Lord hath not been enlarged, yet it hath " been much better underftood, more clearly " written and promulgated than it was before, " and the contrary Doftrine of Purgatory hath *' been exploded and baniihed from the Belief " 9f all reaibnable Men ».'* Which Senfe o£ the apocalyptical Words removes t\\tm flill farther 3 Drfertatiorts on the Pro^hecieSy &C. z"* Ei. Vol. III. p. 262 —265. H from 98 Dissertation I. Secft. 5. from being any Argument for the Soul's imme- diate Tranflation to its filial Slate of Reward in Heaven *. SECTION V. How the antient DoUrine came to he laid afide. WE have fcen, upon what Evidence of Rea- fon and holy Scripture the antient Doc- trine of an intermediate State of the Soul^ between Death and the Refurre^ion^ ftands. And, per- haps, the Reader may now be induced to think, it has Truth on its Side — How this, which was the current Dodtrine of the Catholic Church, till within little more than 300 Years ago, came to be laid afide, and That of the Soul's immediate Tranjlation to Heaven or Hell to take its Place, in the Chriilian World, I am here to account for. Now, we find the antient Do6lrine profcribed by public Authority, in the following Cayion of the Council of Florence, held under Pope Euge* 4 If we add to the Text, above cited, the Words imme- diately following, and with which the V^rfe concludes — and fhiir JVorks do fotlo-w them- — the whole PafTage may he un- derilood to afiert the Bk/jedne/s of the dead ivhich die in ibt Lord, not only becaufe they rcji from their Labours, but be- caufe they are Cure to receive the Reward of their Faith and Obedience. A Declaration worthy of a Voice from Hewven ! ci^it I ' nius Sed. 5, State of the "Dead. 99 mus IV. A.D. 1439 ^. " If the truly penitent Ihall " depart this Life in the Love of God, before " they have made fufficient Satisfaction for their " Sins of Commifllon and Omiffion, by Fruits *' worthy of Repentance, their Souls are purg- " ed by the Pains of Purgatory ; and the Suf- " frages of the living are profitable for the re- •' lieving them from the Pains of Purgatory, *' namely, by Sacrifices of the Mafs, Prayers, *' and Alms, which, according to the Cliurch, are " performed by the faithful, on the Behalf of the " faithful. ButtheSoulsofthofe, who, after Bap- *' tifm, have contrafted no Stain of Sin, as alFo *' thofe Souls, which, having contra<5led the " Stain of Sin, whether in their Bodies or di- " vefted of their Bodies, have been purged as " above-mentioned, are immediately received into ** Heaven^ and clearly behold the triune God as he " is ; but fome of them more perfedlly than *' others, according to the Difference of their «' Merits." This plain KeceJJion from Antiquity^ as Bp. I'aylor calls it ^, was evidently made to fupport the very kcraiive Dodlrine of Purgatory. For, it being thought abfurd to fuppofe, that Souls, relieved from the Pains of Purgatory by the Prayers of the s See the Greek Hijiory of this Comicil, publiflied by Crejgh' /p«, 1660. and Caranza, Sum, Ccncil. 454.. f. v. '' Ubi fupra. H 2 living. 100 Dissertation I. Secfl. 5. living, Ihould continue any longer in an inter- mediate State, there was a Necefllty of fending them, fo releafed, direftly to Heaven and the En- joyment of the Beatific Vifion. And we fliall prefently fee another Reafon for this Departure from the antient Doctrine by the Chriftians of the Romijh Communion. In which Recejfion from Antiquity, we find the Protejiants univerfally joining with the Papijls ^ ; and for a Reafon, which I will give the Rea- der in the Words of the celebrated Ludovicus Capellus ; who, having proved (againft the then received Opinion) that " the feparated Soul does '* not go immediately to Heaven or Hell, but *' remains in a State of iiA^/>^^^//o;z," fays: "Some *' perhaps may wonder, hQW it has happened, " if our Opinion be the more probable, that *' both PrDteJiant and Popijh Divines have agreed *' in That Opinion which we oppofe. I anfwer, "> Luther, indeed, and Calvin, the Fathers of the Refor- mation, Both held an intermediate State, but differed toto calo in their Notions of it. Luther s laft and fettled Opinion (for Jhe was not always of the fame) appears to have been, that *' the Soul lies in aprofoutid, infcnfiblc. Sleep, and contained " in an incorporeal Sepulchre, in like Manner as the body is •' contained in it's Grave." See his Comment on Eccl. ix. 10. Cal-uin, on the contrary, in a Tradl intitled Pfycopanny-' (hia, maintained (as the Word imports) that " the Soul " continues avjake throughout the ^i^hole Night of Death, " with all the Con/ciou/nefs and Senfthility necefiary to the En- '< joyment of Happlncfs." 4. " that Sedl. 5. State of the Dead. loi " that both the one and the other have departed " from the primitive Opinion of the antient Fa- *' thers of the Chriftian Church, and efpoufed *' this other, but v/ith different Views. The " Papijis^ in Order to fupport their erroneous " Praftice of invocating the Saints^ thought it " convenient, that the Saints fhould be ftation- *' ed, before the Refurre^ion^ in the third Hea- " njen, where the bieifed enjoy the beatinc Vi- *' fion of God, and where, in their fiftitious " Mirror of the Divine EfTence, they might be- " hold all Things which are tranfafled upon *' Earth : and that being by this Means nearer, " and confequently more like unto God, they " might feem to beproperer Objedis of our Pray- " ers. Vows, and religious Worfiiip. It was " therefore the Spirit of Superftition and Ido- *' latry, which drove the Papifts into this Opi- *' nion. But the Protejiants^ having another " Popifh Error to oppofe, namely Purgatory^ *' and the proper Satisfaftion for Sin there to be " made, which would have authorized the Pope's " Indulgences % were afraid, that, if they Ihould " grant S The Doftrine of Purgatory authorizes the Pope's Indul- gences with a Witnefs. For, we learn from Travellers, par- ticularly Kcyjler (in his Trawls thro' Germany, Bohemia, &c. Lond. 1760. Vol, II.) that fome of ihe Churches in Rcman- Catholic Countries have the Privilege of granting Indulgences for many thoufandi of Years. Thus at the Church of the An- H 3 nunciatiQu 102 Dissertation I. Sed:. 5. " grant that there was a third Place appointed " for the Souls of the pious and holy after this " mortal Life, they might likewife be obliged " to admit this fiflitious Purgatory. They there- " fore thought it fafer abfolutely to deny any " Middle State, than to expofe themfelves to nunciaiion at Rome may be had Indulgences for tet: thou/and Years. Upon which That judicious Traveller gives us this Remark. " Plere I cannot but obferve, that Proteftants are ** millaken in imagining the Term of Indulgences to relate " to this Life, and, confequently, that an Indulgence of a ** Year authorizes a twelve-Months Courfe of Sin. The *' Idea of the Roman-Catholicks is very different ; for they *' believe that they concern only the future State. For In- *' fiance, they imagine that a Perfon, who, for the Puri- *« fication of his Soul, ought to remain in Purgatory a hun- «• dred thoufand Years, fliall be difcharged at the Expira- •' tion often thoufand, if he has taken Care in his Life- *' Time to provide himfelf wath Indulgences for ninety " thoufand Year?." p. 244. So likewife at the Church of J/. Paul nvithoict the Walls, m.iy be purchafed Lidulgaices for fix thoufand Tears. Upon which our Traveller remarks : *< Indeed to me it is fomething of a Wonder, that any Per- " fon, who is really perfuaded, that eternal Happinefs is •' to be obtained, by thofe Indulgences procured by vifiting •' Churches and Altars, can be eafy without fpending fome •' Time at Rsme ', it being the only Place in the World " where That BlefTednefs may be fecured with fo little «' Trouble, as Indulgences for twenty thoufand Years may " be acquired in half a Day, by vifiting the proper Chur- " ches." p. 245. No Wonder this monftrous Abufe of /;/- iltiUences ftirred up the Spirit of Martin Luther to declaim publickly againft it, and thereby gave Birth to a Refcrmixtion of Religion in m?.ny Parts of the Chriftian World. " thp Sed:. 5. State of the Dead. 103 *' the Tricks and Subtilties of the Paplfts in " fupporting their Purgatory, by granting fuch '* third or middle State'." Thus far this learned Proteftant ; who has, I believe, afiigned the true Reafons, why both Papijls and Protefiants thought fit to depart from the antient Dodrine of the Intermediate State. But I muft confefs, I cannot fee the NecefTity the Frcteftants were under of joining with the Papifis in this Recejfion from Antiquity. The Dodrine of Purgatory is fo far from being a Confequence of, or any Way conneded with. That antient Dodrine, that it is effe(5lually fhut out by it. For, according to the Church of Rome, they that die in venial Sins are puniflied, for a Time, in Purgatory^ till God's Juflice be fatisfied. But, according to the antient BooJrine, the Interme* diate State is a State of nt'iihtv a 5fual Reward nor aHual Puniflment, but (as Capellus expreffes it) of Ey:pe£lation only, or a ProfpeB of Reward or Puniftiment. So that the Protejlants might have continued to maintain the antient Do£lrine, and ftill have had it in their Power to rejed: and dif- prove the RomiJJi Do<5trine of Purgatory. The Church of England having faid nothing, in her Articles, as they Hand at prefent % of the State 9 Ludov. Capell. De Homlnum poft Mortem Statu u/que a4 ultimum Jndicii Diem. Amil. 1689. infijie. > In K. Edv.mrd\ Articles, indeed, the fortieth declares againft the fuppofed Death or Sleep of the SouU in thefe H 4 Words 104 Dissertation I. Sed:. ^^ State of the dead between Death and the Refurrec- t'wn^ her Senfe of the Matter can be collefted only from her Liturgy, and particularly the Of- fice for the Burial of the dead. There fhe pro- fefTes to believe, that " Almighty God " hath " taken unto himself the Soul of" the deceafed -, that " the Spirits of them that depart hence in " the Lord do live with God ", and that " the *' Souls of the faithful, after they are delivered " from the Burden of the Flefh, are in Joy and *' Felicity •, " but that " we " lliall not " have *' our ■perfetl Confummation and Bhfs, both in " Body and Soul, in " God's " eternal and ever- " lafting Glory," till " the Number of" his eled " be " accomplilhed, and " his *^ King- *' dom " ad'ually come. The Difference between this and the antient Do^rine lies in the Suppofition of the Soul's being " taken unto God ", and " living with *' God i " which ExpreiTions feem to imply its immediate 1'ranjlaticn to Heaven. And it is more than probable, the Compilers of our Liturgy really meant to exprefs That Do6trine. But they Words : They, ixiho fay, that the Souls of fuch as depart hence do Jleep, being ivithout Sen/c, Feeling, or Penei'ving, until the Day of 'Juctg7nent ; or affirm, that the Souls die •with the Bodies^ find at the laji Day Jhall be raifed up •Tvith the fame ; do utterly difent from the right Belief declared to us in the holy Scripture. Collier's Ecclef Hijl. Vol. 11. Records, N". LXVI. See my Defence of the commonly-recei'ved DoSlrine of the human Soul, Sec. Sea. n, agree Sed. 5. State of the Dead. 105 agree with the antient Fathers in fuppofing the Soul excluded from the fupreme Happwefs oi' Hea- ven {tht perfe^l Confiimmation andBIifs) 'till its Re-union with the Body, And, when we con- fider, that the being or living with God are Ex^ preffions of great Latitude (for we may be faid to be zvith or without God even in this Worlds Eph. ii. 12.) we may ufe the Words of our Church in a Senfe confiftent with the antient Dodrine of the Intermediate State. We may fuppofe the Soul, even in its State of Exclufton from the Local Heaven^ enjoying fuch a Meafure of the Divine Frefence (for God is cmniprefent) as to be in a State of great Joy and Felicity. But of this more hereafter. In the mean Time, taking it for proved, by the Evidence of Reafon and Scripture above al- ledged, that the Soul of Man, upon its Separa- tion from the Body, does not pafs dire£lly to its final State cf Retribution in Heaven or Hell, but exifts in fome intermediate State till the Refurrec- iion \ let us proceed (as far as an humble and fubmiffive Exercife of Human Reafon, aided by fuch Light as can be procured from Divine Re^ velation, will enable us) to fome Enquiries re- lative to That fuppofed State ; and let us begin with an Enquiry into the Place of the Soul's Reftdence, during its Separation from, anc^ be« fore its Re-union with, the Body. S E C- io6 Dissertation I. Sed:. 6. SECTION VI. An Enquiry inio the Place cf departed Souls. HP H E Antients unanimoufly call the Place "■^ of departed Souls by the Greek Name of ("Ac/'«r) Hades or the inviftble Region *. And this Word they borrowed from the Scriptures^ in which Hades (in Hebrew '7'i>iU; Shed) is commonly uicd to denote the Place and State of the dead *. As » GAytLToi fj.lv yu^tVyXi '\'^iyj\i >y ffc^ixaroi' a<^Hi ^:» vfjibv €J'7eC0if iK^n fJMff a^ J^io^ofj.iv©'. Andre,-e et Arethes Comment, in Apccalypfin. i. e. " Death is the Separation of the " Soul from the Body. Hades is a Place, invifible and un- •■ perceivable by us, into which our departed Souls are re- *' ceived." 3 In cur Engllp Bible, Sbeol and Hades are render'd by the Vv''o5d Hell, derived from the Saxon Hit to hide, or its Parti- ciple helled, hidden or co'vered ; and therefore Hell is not im- j^roperly ufed to denote a conceMed or invijible Place. Thut His (Chriji's) Soul ivas 7iot left in Hell («is acf'y) neither his TUfij did fee Corruption. Adls ii. 31. In reading the Scrip- tures, we fitould bear in Mind this original Senfe of the Word Hell, becaufe, in modern Speech, it is confined to the Place of the damned in the World to come. The Je-ivs diftinguilhed Sheol into Superior and hfcrior ; the former, the Place of good Souls; the latter of bad, From whence, probably, the Heathen Poets derived their Eh- f,um and Tartarus, Many Interpreters underftand our Savi- our's Sedl. 6. State of the Dead. 107 As the Human Soul of our blefTed Redeemer^ at its Separation from his Body^ is univerfally believed to have pafled into the fame Place, whither the Souls of all Mankind are tranflated at Death •, I fliall lay before the Reader the Doc- trine of Hades, or the invijible Region of departed Spirits, in the Words of two of our mofl emi- nent EngliJliJDivmeSj in their Comments on That Article of the Jpojiks Creed, He defcended into Hell. Bifliop Pearfon, after examining various In- terpretations of That Article, exprefies himfelf thus : " As the Souls, at the Hour of Death, *' are really feparated from the Bodies, fo the " Place, where they are in Reft or Mifery, is " certainly dijlin5l from the Place in which they *' lived. They continue not v/here they were " at That Inftant when the Body was left with- " out Life : they do not go together with the " Biody to the Grave ; but, as the Sepulchre is ** appointed for our Flefh, fo there is another " Receptacle or Habitation and Manfion for our our's Parable oit\iQ Rich Matt and Lazarus to be an Allufion to the Superior and Inferior Sheol of the jfe-ivs. It may be fo. But it is not to be underAoodo{ Hades, according to Scrip- ture, Reafon, and the antient Fathers ; becaufe it repre- fents the State of Lazarus as a State of ai^ual RenvarJ, and That of the Rich Man as a State oi aSlual Punijhment ; neither of which is the Cafe with the intermediate State of the Soul, ^ee the trwe Senfe of That Parable in Senior. IV. " Spirits. io8 Dissertation I. Sedl. 6. " Spirits. From whence it followeth, that in *' Death the Soul doth certainly pafs by a real " Mcticn from That Place, where it did inform " the Body, and is tranflated to That Place, and *' unto That Society, which God of his Mercy *' or Juilice hath allotted it. And — it will ap- " pear to have been the general Judgment of " the Church, that the Soul of Chrift, contra- *' diHinguifhcd from his Body, That better and ** more noble Part of his Humanity, was really *' and truly carried to thole Parts, where the " Souls of Men departed were detained ; and " that by fuch a real Trantlation of his Soul he *' was truly faid to have defcended into Hell^.^'* Dr. Ifaac Barrow^ treating the fame Subje6b, has thele Words. " Seeing it is a moft certain *' I'ruth, that our Saviour's Soul did imme- ** diately go into the Place appointed to re- *' ceive happy Souls, after their Recefllon from " the Body, and Rtfignation into God's Hands \ " if we take Hell in a general and common " Senfe for the Place or State of Souls departed, *' 2iw6. def c ending iox faffing thereinto (by a falling " as it were from Life, or by going away to- *' gether with the Defcent of the Body, and *' thence ftyled defcending •, what appeareth vi- " fibly happening to the Body, being accom- *' modated to the Soul) if, I fay, we do thus *f Expojition of the Creedy j^io, lO^^^ p. 478. .. ..v,v^ " interpret J Sed. 6. State of the Dead. 109 ** interpret our Saviour's Defcent into Hell for " his Soul's going into the common Receptacle " and Manfion of Souls ^ we fhall fo doing be fure " not fubflantially to miftake. And this Senfe " I conceive to be very proper to this Place, ^^ as it implies the perfe6t Accomplifhment of " of Death, for the Soul to have deferted the " Body, and to have been tranflated into the " dJ^vvarov acP^v * (as the Book of TVifdom calls " it) the inviftble Region fo far diftant hence ^.'* I have chofen to exprefs the Dodlrine of Hades in the Words of Bp. Pearfon and Dr. Barrow, becaufe thofe great Divines are manifeft Excep- tions to That general Departure from the antient Dodlrine of the Intermediate State, in which the Protejlants fo readily followed the Example of the Papijls. For, by affigning a common Recep- tacle or Manfion of Souls after Death, they plain* ly exclude the departed Soul from an immediate Paflage to Heaven or Hell. But theQueftion ftill recurs, Where h Hades ? What Region of the Univerfe has the Almighty marked out to be the Common Receptacle or ?dan- fion oi Souls, between Death and the R?furrec- tion ? A Queftion, we might well pafs over, as of little or no Importance, were there not an f hevitahle Hell. Wifd. xvH. 1 4. * Works in fol. Liond. 1716. Vol. ii. p. 301. aniient no Dissertation I. Se6l. 6. antient DoHrine concerning it, which defervei our Confideration. It appears to have been the general Opinion of the primitive Chrijlians, arifing from thofe Paflages of the New Tejiament^ on which is founded the Article of Chrift's Be/cent into Hell, that Hades or Hell is a Subterraneous Region or Place under Ground. Let Tertullian, who flourifli- ed about the latter End of the fecond Century, deliver the common Sentiment. " Plato " (fays That Father) " in his Pbeedon, defcribes the " infernal Regions to be an holkw Bofom of the " Earth, into which all the Filth of the World *' flowing, and there fettling, is from thence " exhaled, and renders the Air thick and un- " fit for Refpiration. But we Chrijlians be- " lieve Hell to be, not a mere Cavity, nor any " open Sink of the World, but a vaft Place in '*' the Depth and Boivels of the Earth -, fince we *' read, that Chrifl being dead was three Days " in the Heart of the Earthy that is, in the mofl " intimate Recefles of ir, covered clofe and " kept fecret by the Earth, and hollowed with- *^ in it, but yet built and founded on lower " Depths and Abyfles. " And again : " If " Chrift, though God, yet, as Man, dying and *' being buried, according to the Scriptures, " here fatisfied the Law, by fuffering the pcr- 5* fed Form of Human Death to pafs upon him .'•..V.R-, *' in Sed. 6. State of the Dead, 1 1 1 .*' in Hell •, nor did afcend into the higheft Hea- *' vens till he had defcended into the lower Parts " of the Earth, that there he might make the *' Patriarchs and Prophets Partakers of his Me- ** rits ; hence you have fufficient Ground to be- •' lieve, that there is a fuhterraneous Region of *' Hell, and to confute thofe, who have Pride, *' enouo-h to imagine that the Souls of the Faith- " ful are too good for That Place 7. How agreeable foever both to Scripture and Human Reafon the antient Do3lrine of an Inters mediate State in general may be, this Branch of it, A Subterraneous Hades or Under-ground Recep- tacle of Souls, is, I verily think, far from being fo. For, In the firft Place, The Texts, referred to by ^ertullian, appear, when rightly interpreted, to have no Concern with any Kind of Hades or Re- septacle of Souls '. The firll is. That of Sc 1 Tertull. De Anima. c. 55, 56. 8 It will not follow from hence, that the Dodlrine of ou? Saviour's Dejcent into Hades or Hell has no Foundation in Scrip" ture. For, tho' it be no where formally or exprefsly deliver- ed in the Nenxj Tejlament, it is fufficiently implied in thq Hiftory of his Death, Burial, and Rsfurredicn. It is agreed, that he had an Human Soul, as well as Body ; and it is cer- tain, that his Soul was feparated from his Body by Death, and re-united with it at his Refurre£lion. And, confs- Tspa /t/spH TWf y7H. In fome Manufcripts, the "Word |UipH (Parts) is abfent. See Curcell. No'v. Tefi. This Reading, the learned in Grammar will perceive, is ftill more favourable to the Interpretation here contended for. » Vhifupra. p. 501—506. «' thefe Sed. 6. State of the Dead. J13 " thefe lower Parts of the World, called the " Earth •, or, to the Virgin's Womb, to be con- " ceived there in Human Flefli, which is by " the Pfalmifl alfo ftyled ht\n^ fajiiiomd hmeatb " in the Earth ; or elfe to the Grave, called the " lower Parts of the Earth ? '* And a very learned Commentator fays : " The Apoftle does " not compare one Part of the Earth with an- " other, but the whole Earth with the Hea- " ven*." As there is no Foundation in Scripture, fo nei- ther is there in Reafon^ for the Notion of a Sub- terraneous Hiides, We fee no Propriety or fpe- cial Ufe in the Appointment of fuch a Receptacle of Souls. On the contrary, it may be objeded, firft, that it feems moft natural to fuppofe, that Spirit, difengaged from Matter, fhould fly off from the Surface of this Ten cftrial Abode, than that it fhould ftnk downwards, and penetrate into the Bowels of the Earth ; fecondly, that it feems a little incongruous to fuppofe, that two fuch different Subflances, as Soul and Body, fhould, upon their Separation, go Both the fame Way, and have nearly the fame Place of Abode (the Body in its Grave near the Surface, and the Soul in an Abyfs fomewhat deeper, and nearer to the » Non hie Comparationem inftituit Apoftolus unius Partis Terrs ad aliam, fed totam Terram cuin Ca,lo confert. Hcming. Comment, in Epijl. in loc. I Centre 114 Dissertation I. Sed. 6. Centre of the Earth) during their feparate Ex- iftence •, and, laftly, that the gloomy, difmal. Caverns in the Womb of the Earth feem not to be the fittcil Refidence of happy Souls (fuch as 'Teriuliian places there) the Souls of Palriarcbs, Prophets^ and other good and deferving Perfons. I lay no great Strefs on thefe Arguments. It is fuflicient, that Reafon has nothing to alledge, that can n^ake it in the leafl Degree probable, that the feparated Soul defcends into the Bowels of the Earth, and is there detained till the Time of its Re-union with the Body. But, though there be no Ground for placing the departed Soul within the Bowels of the Earth, may we not reafonably fuppofe it to have its Refi- dence,during the Interval between Death and the Refurredlion, in the Air or Atmofphere ? The na- tural Tendency of Spirit (as has been obferved) is Upward, or from off the Surface of the Earth ; and Tertiillian takes Notice % that the Platonijls and Sides held, that wife and good Souls have Seats exalted in the Air or Atmofphere, and thole higher or lower in Proportion to their Wifdom and Goodncfs •, but that foolifh and corrupt Souls are deprejfed towards the Earth, and, according to their Foily and Corruption, hover at a greater or lefs Diftance from its Surface. 3 De Jnima. c. 2.. Befides : Sed:. 6. State of the Bead.* 115 Befides : If it be reafonable to fuppofe, that no confiderable Portion of univerlal Space is abr folutely void of all intelligmt Beings why may we not believe, that the Air or Jtmcfphere, furround- ing this Globe of Earth, is furnifhed wiih in- telligent Beings, thin, light, aerial, or fpiritual Beings, fuited to the Nature of inch an Element ? It IS certain, that the Affirmative has been held by the ableft Philofophers, both antient and mo- dern. And, if fo, here feems to be a fit Habi- tation, ready at Hand, for the Reception of the departed Soul ; a Place, where it will dwell and converfe with other created Spirits^ of a Nature limilar to its own. This Hypothefis, indeed, is much more pleaf- ing to the Imagination, than That of a Subter- raneous Hades. Here is Liberty., and an extenfive Range for the difembodied Spirit to expatiate in, Inflead of the narrov/ Limits of a Prifon. Here hz.lightfome and chearful Habitation, inftead of an Abode inveloped with perpetual Gloom and un- interruptedD^r/^?Z6y}. Yet, I think, even this Fly- pothefis is not to be admitted ; and That for thefe two Reafons. Firft, Becaufe the Air or Atmofphere cannot properly be confidered as an invifible Region or Hades, the Term, by which Scripture and the antient Fathers dclcribe- the Place or Habitation of departed Souls. For, though the Particles of Air be too fmall for cor- poreal Sight, the Region itfelf is fufficiently vijibk, I 2 appearing ii6 Dissertation I. Sed. 6. appearing to our View as a Kind oi Arch or Vault , placed over the Surface of the Earth (not unlike the Chryfial of a Watch) and illuminated by the Solar Rays difperfed every Way throughout it. Secondly, Becaufe, if the Ai'r or Atmofphere of this terrefirial Globe be the prefent Seat or Red- dence of the Devil and his Angels, as we have good Reafon from Scripture to believe it is ♦ j we can hardly fuppofe the Souls of the Righteous configned to the fame Habitation with thofe ac- curfed Spirits. But, if we cannot find a proper Place for the departed Soul, either in or about this Terrefirial GlcbCy we muft look for its Habitation, during the Interval between Death and the ReJurre5iion, fome where elfe in the vafl Extent oi infinite Space. And, accordingly, the learned Grotins, comment- ing on Luke viii. 31. fays : " If there be Room " for a modeft Conjedture, I fhould rather fup- " pofe the Abyfs or Deep, as alfo the Region ot *' happy Spirits, to be without, or at a Dijlance *' from, this vifible World, than, as fome do, " in the Centre (or Bowels) of the Earth." We may, therefore, venture to define Hades, or the inviftble Region of departed Spirits, to be. Some circumscribed Portion of universal SpACii, BEYOND THE LiMITS OF THIS HABITA- BLE Globe. 4 See Dijert. IV. Sscl. U. Whether Sedt. 6. State of the Dead. iij Whether this Portion of Space be within or without the Orbit of the Earthy and whether near or at a confiderable Dijiance from this habitable Globe * — How the Soul, on its Separation from the Body, pajfes into Hades^ whether by its own proper Adlivity, or by the Affiftance of fome mi- nijlring Spirit of the Almighty -Whether the Inhabitants of Hades dsveW promifcuoujly together, or (which feems the more reafonable Suppofi- tion) in feparate Manfions or diftinul Difiri5fs of That invifihle Region^ according to their refpec- tive ClalTes, as diftinguiilied by their feveral Merits — Whether //^is'd'j be illuminated^ or involv- y Dr. Hodges, late Pro-voji of Oriel College in Oxford, who follows the Jenxn/h Notion of a y5^/mor and inferior Sheol or Hades, propofes it to be confidered, " whether that Circle *' of thick Darknefs, which furrounds the fix Days Work of " the Creation, and was poflibly ordered thither upon the *' firll Creation of Light, Gen. i. 4. or, however, after the ** fecond Divifion or Expanfion, mentioned at the 14th " Verfe, and when the Luminaries were formed,- and ap- " pointed for a Divider between Day and Night, as well as " for other great Purpofes, may not be the Inferior SheoL " The Phrafe oi outer Darknefs, made Ufe of by St. Mai- " thenxj, ch, VIII, XXII, XXV, feems to favour fuch a *' Suppofition." Chrifian Plan, See. 2d Ed. Lond. 1765. P- 303- Alate learned Writer conjeftures, that " Hades is within the *' Earth's Orbit, and fo, according to the Copernican Syjiem, " under the Earth, or farther retired from the Heavens «* than we are." Univerfal Rejlitution a Scripture DoSlrine. 1761. p. 48. I 3 ed ii8 Dissertation I. Se(fl:. 7. ed in Darknefs •, if the former, whether the whole Region, or That Part only, which belongs to good Souls, enjoys the Benefit of Light ; and •whether That Light proceeds from the Rays of onr Stm, or of fome other heavenly Body, or is a peculiar Light created purpofely for the Illumi- nation of That Rece-ptack of Souls < Thefe are Queftions, neither neceffary to be aiked, nor pofTible to be anfvvered. All we learn, from Reafcn and Scripture^ is, in general, that there is an Hades or invifihle Region of departed Spirits i and that the Soul, divorced from its Companion the Body, mud, fome how or other, pafs into That diftant Region^ and be there de- tained, till the Time appointed by God Al- mighty for its Re-union with the Body, and I'ranflation to \X.% final State of Reward or Punijlu merit in Heaven or Hell. SECTION VII. ji^n Enquiry into the State of the departed Soul, with RefpeU to Knowledge, and with Refpe5t to Happinefs or Mifery. FROM enquiring into the Flace of the de- parted Soul, our Dijfertation proceeds to con- fider the intermediate State of That Spiritual Part of the Pluman Compofition, vv'ith Refpe<5l to Knowledge, Sed. 7^ ^tate of the Bead, 119 Knowledge, and with Refped to Uafphufs or Mi- fery. And, Firft, With Refpeft to Knowledge. Now The' Soul, being, by Nature, ^ thinking Stih- fiance (that is, a Subftance, of which thinking is an ejfentid Property) cannot lole the Faculty of Cogkatif^n or ninking, but by lofing its very Being. It continues, therefore, to think, during i-ts Separation from the Body. Nor can we fup-, pofe the Soul to think, without fuppofing it to exercife, in fome Meafure or Degree, the feve- ral Modes of Thinking, as Recolkmon, Reafoning, Judgment, and the like. In Order to which, we muft neceffarily fuppofe it poffefied of Ideas^ thefe being the proper Materials of 'Thinking in all its Modes. But, Whence has the Soul its Ideas in Hades ? Does it carry any with it into That World of Spirits ? And does it receive any new ones there ? I anfwer : It mud have them by one or other of thefe Means, and moft probably by Both. It is reafonable, I think, to fuppofe, that the Dijfolution of the Union between the Soid and the Body does not deprive the former of all the Ideas or Imprejfwns it received by Means of That Union. The Soul, we know by Experience, re- tains its Ideas during the Hours of Sleep. For, .of what elfe are Dreams compounded ? And we know, that, at That Time, the Bodily Senfes are, I 4 as I20 Dissertation I. fed. 7. as it were, locked up, and the Tye or Connection between Soul and Body confiderably loofened or relaxed. Why, then, may not the Soul retain its Ideas, or Part of them, when the Knot is quite untied^ and the Body lies ajleep in Death ? We fhall the more readily acquielce in this Suppofition, if we admit the (not improbable) Hypothefis of the Soul's Material Vehicle^ as it is called : By which is to be underftood, that the Soul, even during her Refidence in the Body, is doathed with another Body (if I may fo fpeak) compofed of mod exquifitely fine Particles of Matter ^, For, if we fuppofe, that the Soul, confined ^ This was originally a Platonic DoSirine, and is thus ex- prefl'edby the learned and ingenious Bifliop Berkley. *' The " Platonifts held, thzt IntelieSl refided in Soul, zxiASoulin " an athereal Vehicle : and that, as the Soul was a middle *» Nature reqonuiing Intelieft with ^ther; fo ^Ether was •' another middle Nature, v/hich reconciled and connedled " the Soul with groffer Bodies." " Plato''' (adds the Bifliop) " fpeaketh of the Mind or Soul as a Dri'ver that " guides and governs a Chariot, which is not unfitly ftyled " au^cMtTs^ 'c;v h/^.- , a luciform aethereal Vehicle ; Terms ex- '« prefiive of the Purity, Lightnefs, Subtility, and Mobility <' of That fine coeleftial Nature, in which the Soul imme- «' diately refides and operates." Chain of Philofopkical Re- feSlic.: and Inquiries, t\f. Lond. 1744. p. 78, 79. The ingenious Mr. Woolajion quotes from our great Eng- lifh Philofopher Mr. Locke the following juft Obfervation. «< It is worth our Coniideration, whether «^//i;f Pow^r be ** not the proper Attribute of Spirit, and pajji-ve Poiuer of " Matter. Sedl. 7* State of the Dead. 121 confined within the Body, receives her Intelli- gence or Ideas of Things by Means of Imprejfions made on her Material Vehicle ^ ; and that this Vehicle or Cloathing, with which fhe is infepar- ably united, departs with her out of the Body, *^ Matter. Hence may be conjeflured, that created Spirits *' are not totally feparatedfrom Matter, becaufe they are both " aftive and paffive. Pure Spirit, viz. God, is only active : " Pure Matter is only paffive. Thofe Beings, that are both *' aftive and paffive, we judge to partake of Both." Ac- cordingly, Mr. Woolafton concludes, that the Soul, even during its Refidence in the Body, is " intimately united with " fome fine Material Vehicle ;" that " thefe aft in Con- *< junftion. That, which afFeds the one, afFeding the o- ^^ ther ;" that " the Soul is detained in the Body (the Head f* or the Brain) by fome Sympathy or AttraSiion between That " and It, till the Habitation is fpoiled, and this mutual ^* Tendency interrupted (and, perhaps, turned into an A- ** verfion, which makes it fly off) by fome Hurt orDifeafe, <* or by the Decays and Ruins of Old Age, or the like, f* happening to the Body." Religion of Nature delineated, /i^to. " 1731- P- J92. 193- 1 " This animated Vehicle" (Mr. Woolajion fuppofes) *' has it's Abode in the Brain, among the Heads andBegin- ** nings of the Nerves ;" and, " when Impreffions are made «' on the Organs or Parts of the Body, the Effefts of them ^' are carried by the Nerves up to their Fountain, and the *' Place where the Soul in her Vehicle is ; and there they *' communicate their feveral Motions or Tremors to this " material Vehicle (or, by their Motions, or Tendency to *' Motion, prefs upon it \) fo that the Soul, which inha- *• bits it in a peculiar Manner, and is throughly poflelTed of ." it, fhall be apprehenfxve of thefe Motions or PrcfTures." Vhi fupra, p. 197. and 122 Dissertation I. Se<3:. 7. and accompanies her into Hades ; we can eafily conceive, how fhe carries Ideas with her into That World of Spirits ; namely, by Impreflions remaining on That fine Material Subjlance Ihe is cloathed withal. With Refpedt to the Things of this Worlds we cannot fnppofe the departed Soul to have any other Knowledge of them, than what arifes from Memory or RecoUedlion. By contem-plating the Ideas it carries with it into the World of Spirits, it may have a prefent Senfe of many Things, which pafied during its Abode in the Fiefn. It may preferve a Confcioufnefs of its own Opera- tions in the Body, and of the principal Adions it gave Birth to. It may recolkd the chief Cir- cumftnnces of the Man^ his Situation in Life, his Civil and Social Connexions, his Profperity or Adverfity, and the hke. But, with Refped to the Tranfadions of this World after the Death of the Man, we cannot allow the Soul any Know- ledge of them, unlefs by fpecial Communication from God himfelf. For, How fhall the departed Soul, naturally^ acquire any Knowledge of what piaffes iti this W^orld .? It received its Intelligence of Worldly Things by Means of the Bodily Senfesl But this Jnlet of Knowledge is loft by the DifTo- lution of the Bodily Frame. And the Soul's Diftame from the Scene of Adion excludes it from all Poflibility of receiving any Knowledge of what paffes in this World by new Impreflions on Sed. 7. State of the Dead, 123 on its Materkl Vehicle. Nor is It probable, God fhould acquaint the departed Spirit with what palTes in a World, with which it has no further Concern. I conclude, then, that the Soul, in its State of Separaticn from tlie Body, remains an Utter Stranger to, and totally ignorant of, every Thing tranfadled on the Theatre of this Worlds from the Moment of That Separation. Here I cannot but take Occafion to employ the Reafonino; now before us ao-ainft the com- monly-received Opinion and Belief of Appari- tions (as they afe called) or the inftble Appear- ances of Perfons adually dead and buried^ fo as to be known to the living by their Figure, Coun- tenance, Speech, and even-Drefs. Now, taking it for granted, that the Belief of Apparitions iuppofes the Appearance to be That of the Scid or Spirit of the deceafed, and hot That of his or her Body^ which, at That very Inftant, lies rotting in its Grave \ I fliall endea- vour to Hiew the high Improbability of any fuch Appearance. According to the foregoing Do6lrine of the intermediate State, the Soul, immediately upon its Separation from the Body, is removed to a Place at fome Dijtance from this habitable Earth, the deftined Scene of its Exiftence till the Re- furre^ion. And it is moft reafonable to fuppofe, it is detained there by the Will of Providence, without Liberty or Power to make Euturftons from 124 Dissertation I. Sed. /» from thence, or rrcifit this World, before the Time appointed for its Re-union with the Body. For, if it cannot be made appear (as we Ihall prefently fee it cannot) that the Return of the Soul to this World is neceffary, in any one Re- fpe6V, to the Exercife of God's Providence in the Government of the World, we may juftly conclude, there is no Return of ^ouls from their appointed Abode in Hades. But let us fuppofe the Soul at Liberty^ and able of itfelf, to pafs from one Region of the Univerfe to another, how diftant foever ; ftill it may be alked, How fhall it afiume the vifible Form and Appearance of an Human Body ? Its Material Vehicle (if it has one) will not ferve the Purpofe. For, being, probably, of a Contexture finer than Air itfelf, and having its Refidence, toc^ether with the Soul, in the Head or Brain of the Man, it cannot, naturally, be either vifibk or of an Human Shape. And, to fuppofe it in the Power of the Soul, by any Modification what- ever, to render its Vehicle both vifible and of an Human Form, is to fuppofe it endowed with a Power not lefs than That, which formed Man out of the Duft of the Earth. Befides : Suppofing the Soul aftually cloathed with the Phantom or Refemblance of a Body, and arrived at this Earthly Scene •, what could it do Here ? It could have no Knowledge of what pafies in this World, for Want of thofe Bodily Organs^ Sedt. 7. State of the Dead. 125 Organs, which Nature has appointed to be the Means of conveying fuch Knowledge to it. As well may we fuppofe the Fixture of a Man on a Piece of Canvas, as the mere Phantom of a Body, toy^^, hear, and /peak. And therefore, in the very midft of the Things of this Worlds the unorganized Apparition would be as utterly ignorant of them, as the lifehfs Body itfelf. Here is an infuperable Bar in the Way of all In- tercourfe or Communication of Intelligence be- tween the dead and the living. I need not ob- ferve, that thefe Arguments refpeft only the na- tural Powers of the Human Soul, or what it may be fuppofed able, of itfelf alone, to effe6t. But, May not God, for wife Ends of his Pro- vidence, fend the Soul back to Earth, cloathed with a Sort of Body, fo as to be viftble to mortal Eyes, and enabled to hold Converfation with the living ? He may, no Doubt. But our Be- lief of fuch a Divine Interpofition muft fland upon good Grounds of Reafon, and be fupported by indifputable Fa^s. We muft, firft of all, be convinced, that there are Occaftons worthy of fuch a Divine Interpofi- tion, and which feem to require it *. The Dif- ^ Horace^ Rule is applicable here : Nee Deus interfit, nifi dignus Vindice Nodus Incident. 'Dq Arte Poet. \. \()\, Ne'ver prefume to make a God appear. But for a Bujinefs 'worthy of a God. Rofcommon. covcry 126 Dissertation I. Se