3 8r 3 f THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY,! Princeton, N. J. $ * 5 <«= 5 >' 33 ' r>ss z BV 824 .H4 1831 Henry, Matthew, 1662-1714. The communicant's companion PUBLISHED BY 'WILLIAM COLLINS. GLASGOW. THE COMMUNICANT’S COMPANIO N; OR, INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE RIGHT RECEIVING OF THE LORD’S SUPPER. BY THE REV. MATTHEW HENRY. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY, BY THE REV. JOHN BROWN, EDINBURGH. THIRD EDITION. GLASGOW: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM COLLINS; OLIVER & BOYD, YVM. WHYTE & CO. AND WM. OLIPHANT, EDINBURGH; W. F. WAKEMAN, AND WM. CURRY, JUN. & CO. DUBLIN ; WHITTAKER, TREACHER, & ARNOT ; HAMILTON, ADAMS, & CO. SIMPKIN & MARSHALL ; BALDWIN & CRADOCK ; AND HURST, CHANCE, & CO. LONDON. MDCCCXXXI. * ' m m % m * .* •* . * i » i > * 9 Printed by W. Collins & Co, Glasgow. % TQ]tf . INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. There is an important, though often an overlooked difference between the results of human ingenuity, as embodied in the principles of science and the in¬ stitutions of civil society, and the results of divine wisdom, as embodied in the doctrines of revelation and the ordinances of the Christian church. Hu¬ man science is the offspring of the observations and experiments of beings limited in their faculties, and liable to error, and admits, from this very circum¬ stance, of constant growth, frequent correction, and indefinite improvement. The principles of natural philosophy are much better understood at present, not only than they were, but than they could have been a hundred years ago; and it is highly probable, that, before the end of another century, they will be still better understood than they are at present: but, as the most finished work of the human mind is necessarily imperfect, there will always be room for the correction of mistakes, and the supply of de¬ ficiencies. It is altogether otherwise with the doctrines of Re¬ velation. They flow forth absolutely pure from the fountain of knowledge and of truth. They are an in- VI fallible statement of a portion of the mind of Him who alone hath wisdom. Human science is like the statue, which, under the successive strokes of the artist’s chisel, from a rude unformed block, gradually assumes a striking resemblance to 6i the human form divine.” Revealed truth is like our general parent, rising at once into perfect form, and beauty, and life, at the command of his Creator. The improvement even of the most finished statue implies no absurdity ; but the idea of mending the divine work were equally replete with impiety and folly. Human science, being the product of fallible reason, cannot be per¬ fect. There must be deficiency, and there may be error; and it admits of improvement both by correc¬ tion and addition. There is room for neither in the doctrines of revelation. Divine revelation is, from its very nature, free from error, proceeding from him who cannot be deceived, and who cannot deceive; and though imperfect, inasmuch as it does not ex¬ tend to all possible objects of religious knowledge, it obviously admits of addition in no other way than by a new revelation. He who has made known to us a portion of his mind, may, if he pleases, make known to us another portion of it; but till he does so, the whole of our duty, in reference to the revela¬ tion given, is to endeavour distinctly to apprehend the meaning of its various parts, and the relations, connections, and dependencies of these various parts, and to yield up the whole of our intellectual and active nature to its influence. It is equally incon¬ sistent with this duty to attempt to make corrections on the system of revealed truth, or to make additions to it. Vll It would have been a happy thing for the Chris¬ tian world, if the obvious distinction which has now been pointed out had been steadily kept in view by the teachers of religion. The 6t truth as it is in Jesus” would not then have been obscured by at¬ tempts to illustrate it; nor the dogmas of a vain philosophy mingled with the oracles of divine wis¬ dom, or substituted in their room. The ingenuity, and learning, and labour, which have been often worse than wasted, in endeavouring, by working up into a complete system of religion and morals, such of the materials furnished by revelation, as seemed fit for their purpose, along with such materials as they could collect from other sources, while, without ceremony, such portions of revelation as appeared unsuitable to their object, were overlooked or re¬ jected,—might have been devoted to a diligent in¬ quiry into the meaning and connection of the sacred oracles ; and thus have discovered there, made by his hand who made the world, what they must for ever in vain attempt to make for themselves; and we would not have had reason to doubt, in an age when human science has, in all its branches, attained to ati unprecedented state of improvement, whether the principles of revealed truth are not worse understood, among those who profess to believe them, than they were seventeen hundred years ago. A similar distinction ought to be made between the institutions of civil society and the ordinances of the Christian church. The principles of civil go- v ernment are at present much better understood than t hey were, or could have been, in what are ordinarily called the dark ages; and it is certain, whatever a VUl blind reverence for antiquity may urge to the con¬ trary, that the social arrangements which prevail in our own country are incomparably superior to those which existed even in the most illustrious ages of Grecian and Roman history; and it is equally evi¬ dent, whatever a partial fondness for the institutions of our own country and age may suggest, that a much more perfect form of social life is not only easily conceivable, hut, at some future period, is likely to be realized, than any that has yet been established among mankind. These institutions are the result of human ingenuity, and therefore are imperfect. There is something wanting, and something wrong with the best of them. But it is otherwise with the ordinances of the Christian church ; for they are the appointments of infinite wisdom. They were originally given by one who had a perfect knowledge of the end of such institutions—the religious and moral improvement of his people; and a perfect knowledge, too, of that intellectual and moral constitution, for the improve¬ ment of which they are intended,—and, like all the divine works, they are perfect. They are all of them characterized by a beautiful simplicity, which ill accords with the ordinary, but depraved taste of mankind for what is complicated and difficult; but which is a leading feature in all the works and ar¬ rangements of infinite wisdom. It might have been expected, that the institutions of Christianity, bearing on them the impress of su¬ preme authority, would have been accounted too sa¬ cred things to be tampered with by those who ad¬ mitted the divine origin of that religion. But what IX is there too presumptuous for man to attempt? The same principle which led professed Christians to mo¬ dify the doctrines of Christ, led them to alter his institutions. In both cases, they flattered them¬ selves that they were making improvements; but what was the truth ? By their experiments on the doctrines of Christ, they, in many cases, converted the true elixir of immortal life into a deadly poison, and, at the very best, robbed it of its healing virtues, just in the proportion in which they have infused into it baser ingredients : and by their experiments on the institutions of Christ, they have rendered them ut¬ terly unfit, for the purposes they were intended to answer; and, instead of important means of religion and moral improvement, they have made them mere vehicles of amusement to the senses or imagination, and, in many cases, the instruments of extensive de¬ moralization and of fatal delusion. No Christian ordinance has been more perverted by superstition than the Lord’s Supper; and no por¬ tion of Christian truth has been more involved in obscurity and error than that which respects that or¬ dinance. False opinions and superstitious usages mutually produce and support each other. By this malignant action and re-action, in reference to the Lord’s Supper, where the emblematical nature of the institution, and the figurative language in which of course much of the truth respecting it was couched, afforded peculiar facilities for misapprehension, mis¬ representation, and delusion, we find, within the course of a few centuries, the simple rite of an as¬ sembly of Christians eating bread and drinking wine, in grateful commemoration of the expiatory suffer- a 3 X ings and death of Jesus Christ, converted into a splendid and complicated ceremony;* and the plain, intelligible doctrine, that in this ordinance we are presented with an emblematical representation and confirmation of the great principles of our religion, which, by strengthening our belief, contributes to our spiritual improvement, gives way to a portentous dogma, of which it is impossible to say whether it be more absurd or impious, that in this ordinance the bread and the wine are, by the mystic power of a priest’s repeating the words of institution, con¬ verted into the body, and blood, and divinity of Jesus Christ; which, after having been offered to God by the priest, as an expiatory sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead, are literally eaten and drunk by the recipients. So dangerous is it to deviate from the purity of scriptural truth, and the simplicity of primitive usage. It is impossible to say where we will stop. The probability is, that we will not stop till we land ourselves in the pravity of damnable error, and in the absurdity of senseless superstition. At the Reformation, the doctrine of transubstan- tiation, and the practice of the sacrifice of the mass, were discarded by all the Protestant churches; but there was but a partial return to the purity and sim¬ plicity of primitive doctrine and observance. By the Lutheran church, a variety of unauthorized rites were retained, and the doctrine of consubstantiation, * “ That feast of free grace and adoption to which Christ in¬ vited his disciples to sit as brethren and co-heirs of the happy co¬ venant which at that table was to be sealed to them, even that feast of love and heavenly-admitted fellowship, the seal of filial grace, became the subject of horror, and glouting admiration pa- geanted about like a dreadful idol.”— Milton. XI or the real, though impalpable and invisible, pre¬ sence of the body and blood of Christ, along with, and under the substance of bread and wine in the consecrated elements, was substituted in the room of the not more absurd, and certainly not less intel¬ ligible dogma of transubstantiation; and, although most of the reformed churches rejected both these equally unscriptural doctrines, and approximated much more closely to both the principles and practice of apostolical times, yet still it cannot be denied, that in most of their symbolical books there is much mystical statement, respecting the spiritual presence of Jesus Christ in the Lord’s Supper, and the manner in which Christians participate of his body and blood when they observe it; as if Christ’s presence in this ordinance were not essentially the same as his pre¬ sence in any other ordinance, when, by the operation of his Spirit, through the instrumentality of the truth, he communicates to the believing mind know¬ ledge, and purification, and comfort;—as if u the eating Christ’s flesh, and drinking Christ’s blood,” in‘this ordinance, were something else than that par¬ ticipation of those blessings procured by his suffer¬ ings and death, which all true Christians enjoy, whenever they believe the divine testimony respect¬ ing these sufferings and deathand as if all the peculiarities of this ordinance did not originate in the emblematical form in which it brings Christian truth and its evidence before the mind. It is obvious, that to be conducive to the spiritual improvement of those who engage in it, the Lord’s Supper must be “ a rational service,”—an exercise of the mind and of the heart: and it is equally oh- Xll vious, that, for the purpose of rendering it a rational service, it is not our business to endeavour to in¬ vent a spiritual meaning to the emblems which are employed in it; but to endeavour to discover the spiritual meaning, which he who appointed the ordi¬ nances intended to be attached to these emblems. Some writers on the nature and design of this ordinance, seem to have overlooked this; and, of course, their works, though replete with pious fancies, are rather deficient in such distinct, scripturally sup¬ ported views, as are calculated at once to satisfy the mind and guide the exercise of the devout Christian. It is often treated of as an oath of allegiance—-a federal transaction between God and the communi¬ cant—an unbloody sacrifice, or a feast upon a sacri¬ fice—and much fruitless controversy has taken place, which of these, or whether any of them, affords a just representation of its nature, design, and advan¬ tages. Figurative descriptions of an emblematical ordinance do not seem peculiarly well fitted for ex¬ plaining it; and there is a considerable hazard lest, in our following out our tropical illustrations, we end in making the ordinance something altogether different from what Jesus Christ made it; and as the promise of his blessing is attached only to the observance of his institution, we shut ourselves out from the advantages we might have enjoyed from its observance, if we do not, in simple submission to his authority, and reliance on his Spirit, eat bread and drink wine, in believing remembrance and religious commemoration of his expiatory sufferings and death. The simplest, and, to our own minds, the most satisfactory view of the Lord’s Supper which we have been able to take, is that which considers it as, on Xlll the part of Him who instituted it, an emblematical representation and confirmation of the grand peculi¬ arities of the Christian institution; and, on the part of him who observes it, an emblematical expression of a state of mind and heart in accordance with this statement of Christian truth and its evidence. That there is something more in the Lord’s Sup¬ per than meets the external senses—-that its emble¬ matical elements are meant to embody Christian 9/ doctrine, and its emblematical actions to express Christian thought and feeling,-;—there can be no doubt; and in order to discover what is the Chris¬ tian truth which the instituted symbols represent, we are not left to conjecture how such emblems may be naturally interpreted. In the statements of our Lord, and of his inspired Apostles, we have abun¬ dant and satisfactory information. The following is a short account of the institution of the Lord’s Sup¬ per, as narrated by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Paul:—“ The Lord Jesus, that night in which he was betrayed, while observing with his apostles the Jewish passover, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, ‘Take, eat; this is my body which is broken for you : this do in remembrance of me.’ After the same manner he took the cup, when he had supped, and gave it to them, saying, ‘ This cup is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many, for the remission of sins : drink ye ail of it. This do ye as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.’”* The * Matth. xxvi. 26, &c. Markxiv, 22, &c. Luke xxii. 19, kc. 1 Cor. xi. 23, &c. XIV meaning of the highly figurative phrases, te eating Chrises flesh, and drinking Christ’s blood,” may be easily ascertained, from the following quotations from one of our Lord’s discourses:—“ He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. I am that bread of life. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat in¬ deed, and my blood is drink indeed.”* The apos¬ tle Paul, in his first epistle to the Corinthians, makes the following observations in reference to the meaning of the emblems in the Lord’s Supper:— “ The cup of blessing, or thanksgiving, which we bless, or over which we give thanks, is it not the communion-—the mutual participation of the blood of Christ? the bread which we break, is it not the communion—the mutual participation of the body of Christ ? for we being many, are one bread and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.”f These passages of Scripture are the legi¬ timate materials from which we are to form our judg¬ ments as to the meaning of the emblems in the Lord’s Supper; and they certainly warrant us to affirm, that this ordinance is an emblematical repre¬ sentation of all the grand peculiarities of the Chris¬ tian system. Truth may be brought before the mind in two * John vi. 47— 55. f 1 Cor. x. 16, 17. XV ways,—by verbal statement, or by emblematical re¬ presentation. The first is best fitted for conveying new information; the second is admirably calculated for recalling, in a striking manner, to the mind, in¬ formation formerly presented to it. The first me¬ thod of presenting the leading truths of Christianity is adopted in the written and spoken gospel; the se¬ cond, in the Lord’s Supper: and it will be found, on examination, that that ordinance is, as it were, a mi¬ niature picture of the same series of divine dispensa¬ tions, of which we have a detailed history in the word of the truth of the gospel. It may be worth our while to expand this remark a little, and show how full of Christian truth is every part of this emblematical institution. Let us contemplate the symbolical elements and actions, and apply to our Lord and his Apostles for their spiri¬ tual signification. In this ordinance we have bread and wine: and of the bread, our Lord says, “ This is my bodyand of the wine, 6i This is my blood.” These words admit but of two modes of interpreta¬ tion,—the literal, which conducts directly into all the absurdities and blasphemies of transubstantia- tion; and the figurative, which represents the bread and the wine, as emblems of the body and blood of the Redeemer; just in the same way as the rock which supplied the Israelites with water during their wanderings in the wilderness, is called Christ. The words plainly imply, that he who used them had a body and blood—was a possessor of human nature: and the elements, to a well-instructed Christian, naturally recall the grand fundamental doctrine of the incarnation. In silent, but expressive language, 0 XVI they proclaim, 44 The word was made flesh, and dwelt among men: inasmuch as the children were partakers of flesh and blood, he also took part of the same. Great is the mystery of godliness : God was manifest in the flesh.” But in the Lord’s Supper we not only have bread and wine, but broken bread and poured-out wine. Our Lord has unfolded the meaning of these em¬ blems also: 44 This is my body broken, ray blood shed ; my body broken, my blood shed for you; my body broken, my blood shed for remission of sin unto many.” The broken bread and the poured-out wine are, when thus explained, calculated to suggest to Christian minds, that the incarnate Saviour, after a life of suffering, died a violent death ; that these sufferings and this death were vicarious and expia¬ tory, undergone in the room of sinners, to obtain their salvation. It concentrates, as it were, the prin¬ cipal statements both of the prophets and the evan¬ gelists ; and, with one glance of the eye, we see the wondrous plan of human redemption through the mediation of the incarnate only-begotten. It tells us more ouchingly than words could do, that 44 Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures; that he was wounded for our transgressions, and bruised for our iniquities; that in him we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins; that he has given himself for us a sacrifice and an offer¬ ing, and has thus brought us unto God.” But the doctrines of the incarnation and the atone¬ ment are not the only principles of Christian truth which are embodied in the Lord’s Supper. Had their representation been its sole object, it might XVII have been gained by the minister’s exhibiting bread and wine; and, while he pointed to them, proclaim¬ ing, 66 This is Christ’s body broken; this is Christ’s blood shed for you.” But this is not the Lord’s Supper. In that ordinance, we have not only broken bread and poured-out wine; but the broken bread is eaten, and the poured-out wine is drank. This also is replete with spiritual meaning. From the passage above quoted from one of our Lord’s discourses, it is plain, that eating Christ’s flesh and drinking Christ’s blood, is significant of that interest in his sufferings and death, which, by the divine appointment, is con¬ nected with the belief of the truth respecting them : so that here we are furnished with an emblematical representation of that cardinal doctrine of Christian¬ ity, that u whosoever believeth in Christ Jesus shall not perish, but have everlasting life.” As bread and wine, though in themselves most nutritious food, will not nourish us, unless we eat the one and drink the other; so the expiatory sufferings and death of the incarnate Son of God, though of themselves ade¬ quate to the salvation of the greatest sinner, will not save us unless we believe. But we have not yet exhausted the spiritual mean¬ ing of the emblems in the Lord’s Supper. Had it been our Lord’s object merely to embody, in an em¬ blematical institution, the principles, £< that the only- begotten of God in human nature suffered and died in the room of sinners, to procure their salvation ; and that faith in these truths is at once absolutely neces¬ sary, and completely sufficient to secure to the sinner an interest in this salvation ;” it is probable that the sacred rite would have been of such a nature as ad- XV111 mitted of performance by a single individual. But this is not the case with the Lord’s Supper. It is a social institution, and Christians must 66 come to¬ gether to eat the Lord’s Supper.” Without any explicit revelation on the subject, knowing, as we do, from other passages of Scripture, that a very intimate relation does subsist among all the true followers of Jesus Christ, we might perhaps have warrantably concluded, that this mystical feast was intended em¬ blematically to represent their holy fellowship. But it is our wish to say nothing in reference to the mean¬ ing of this ordinance, but what we are distinctly taught in Scripture. Indeed, there is no necessity to have recourse to inference. The passage already quoted from the apostle Paul is most explicit. In partaking of the cup of blessing, there is a commu¬ nion, or mutual participation of the blood of Christ; in partaking of the broken bread, there is a commu¬ nion, or mutual participation of the body of Christ; and the consequence of this mutual participation is, that the partakers are all one body and one bread. The reality and the nature of that intimate relation which subsists among all Christ’s genuine followers, is there strikingly exhibited. They are holy so¬ ciety, bound together by their common faith in the grand leading truths of Christianity, embodied in this emblematical institution, and, by their common love to that Saviour who is in it, “ evidently set forth cru¬ cified and slain.” It is deeply to be regretted, that this part of the meaning of the Lord’s Supper has been so much over¬ looked and forgotten, and that “ the symbol of our common Christianity” should have been almost uni- XIX versally converted into 6( the badge and criterion of a party, a mark of discrimination applied to distin¬ guish the nicer shades of difference among Chris¬ tians.”* It was not so from the beginning. The church of Christ was originally one body: the ordi¬ nance of the Lord’s Supper is suited to such an order of things ; and however perverted from its original purpose, though, instead of the common place of friendly meeting for all who believe the truth and love the Saviour, it has in many cases become 66 the line of demarcation, the impassable boundary which separates and disjoins them,” still, in its obvious em¬ blematical meaning, it sounds a retreat from the un¬ natural divisions which prevail among the genuine followers of the Saviour, by proclaiming that they are indeed all “ one in Christ Jesus.” There is just one other important principle of Christian truth which we consider as embodied in the Lord’s Supper. The Lord’s Supper is a positive institution. It is entirely founded on the authority of Jesus Christ, as Him to whom all power in heaven and earth belongs. It does not, like what may be termed the moral part of our religion, necessarily arise out of the relations in which we stand to God as the God of salvation, and to Jesus Christ as the Redeemer of mankind, such as faith, confidence, and obedience. The sole obligation of this ordinance arises out of its appointment by Christ. It would have been our duty to have gratefully and devoutly remembered our Saviour’s dying love, though no ex¬ press command had been given us to that effect; but * Hall. XX it would not have been our duty to have expressed this grateful and devout recollection by the eating and drinking wine, had not Jesus Christ said, 6< Do this in remembrance of me.” The ordinance, then, embodies in it Christ’s claims on the implicit obe¬ dience of his followers, and holds him forth as their Lawgiver as well as their Saviour. Thus have we seen how replete with Christian truth is this emblematical institution. It forcibly presents to the Christian’s mind these great funda¬ mental principles of his religion, those may be more sensible and vehement at first; and their being less so afterwards, ought not to dis¬ courage us. The fire may not blaze so high as it did, and yet may burn better and stronger. But do I see more and more reason for my religion ? Am I more strongly convinced of its certainty and ex¬ cellency, so as to be able, better than at first, to “ give a reason of the hope that is in me ?” My first love was able to call religion a comfortable ser¬ vice ; was my after light better able to call it a rea¬ sonable service? I was extremely surprised, when, at first, 44 I saw men as trees walking;” but, am I now better satisfied, when I begin to see all things more clearly ? Am I, through God’s grace, better rooted ? Or am I, through my own folly, still as a 44 reed shaken with the wind ?” 2. Do I find my corrupt appetites and passions more manageable; or are they stiil as violent and headstrong as ever ? Doth the house of Saul grow weaker and weaker, and its struggles for the dominion less frequent, and more feeble ? If so, it is a good sign : the house of David grows stronger and stronger. Though these Canaanites are in the land, yet do they not make head as they have done, but are under tribute: then the interests of Is¬ rael are getting ground. Do I find that my desires towards those things that are pleasing to sense are not so eager as they have been, but the body is kept more under, and brought into subjection to grace and wisdom; and it is not so hard a thing to me, as it had been sometimes to deny myself? Do I find that my resentment of those things which are dis¬ pleasing to the flesh, are not so deep and keen as 126 they have been ? Can I bear afflictions from a right¬ eous God, and provocations from unrighteous men, with more patience, and better composure and com¬ mand of myself, than I could have done? Am 1 not so peevish and fretful, and unable to bear an affront or disappointment, as sometimes I have been ? If so, surely He that hath fis begun the good work, is carrying it on.” But if nothing be done towards the suppressing of these rebels, towards the weeding out of these “ roots of bitterness which spring up and trouble us,” though we lament them, yet we do not prevail against them ; it is to be feared we stand as a stay, or go back. 3. Do I find the duties of religion more easy and pleasant to me; or am I still as unskilful and un¬ ready in them as ever? Do I go dexterously about a duty, as one that understands it, and is used to it, and as a man that is master of his trade goes on with the business of it; or do I go awkwardly about it, as one not versed in it? When God calls, Seek ye my face; do I, like the child Samuel, run to Eli, and terminate my regards in the outside of the ser¬ vice; or do I, like the man David, cheerfully answer, “ Thy face, Lord, will I seek ;” and so enter into that within the vail ? Though, on the one hand, there is not a greater support to hypocrisy, than a formal customary road of external perform¬ ances; yet, on the other hand, there is not a surer evidence of sincerity and growth, than an even, con¬ stant, steady course of lively devotion, which, by daily use, becomes familiar and easy, and, by the new nature, natural to us. A growing Christian takes this word before him, and sings at it. 127 4. Do I find my heart more weaned from this present life, and more willing to exchange it for a better; or am I still loath to leave it? Are thoughts of death more pleasing to me than they have been, or are they still as terrible as ever ? If, through grace, we are got above the fear of death, by reason of which many weak and trembling Chris¬ tians are all their life-time subject to bondage, and can truly say, “We desire to depart and to be with Christ, which is far better,” it is certain we are get¬ ting ground, though we have not yet attained it. 5. If, upon search, we find that we make no progress in grace and holiness, let the ordinance of the Lord’s Supper be improved for the furtherance of our growth, and the removal of that, whatever it is, which hinders it; if we find we thrive, though but slowly, and though it is not so well with us as it should be, yet, through grace, it is better with us than it hath been, and that we are not always babes, let us be encouraged to abound so much the more. “ Go and prosper, the Lord is with thee, whilst thou art with him.” V. Inquire, What do I want?—A true sense of our spiritual necessities is required to qualify us for spiritual supplies. The hungry only are filled with good things. It concerns us, therefore, when we come to an ordinance, which is as a spiritual market, to consider what we have occasion for, that we may know what to lay hold on, and may have an answer ready to that question which will be put to us at that banquet of wine—“ What is thy petition, and what is thy request ?” Or that which Christ put to the blind man—“ What will ye that I shall do unto you?” 128 u Grace and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, are inclusive of all the blessings we can desire, and have in them enough to supply all our needs. Since, therefore, we must act