■"••■•^■i .-*■■'' • V;',pl,;i'^';•^"■.^>:'"'■ l«i r*^'^^. tJ^,^;-:«?9Pf JAN10i9? sec /733 F DRINKING 1 N REMEMBRANCE O F T H E D E A D. BEING The Subftance of a Di scour s e Deliver'd to the C L E R G Y of the Diocefe ofCORK, on th^Founhof November, 171 3. by the Bifhop of that Diocefe. And Pub- liflied at their Unanimous Requeft. }e.\- T^:r/-v.Mv- .^y-'f^ r% 'V LOUDON Printed for J. R ob e r t s , near tlie Oxford- Arms in Warwick-Lane, M DCC XIII. Price Six-pence, /// / [3] Of Drinking in Rememhrance of th D E ADj <3cc. T H E Queftion I am now to fpealT to, is this : Whether Drinking in Remembrance of the Deady excepting only in Rememhrance of Jefus Chrifl^ is an A^ion in it felf Sinful^ novo un- der the Gofpel > And whether the Cufiom of Drinking in Rememhrance of a Departed Mo* narchy is fo in particular ? Affi I (hall, by way of Preface, only obferve to you, That were it not for the Power and Prejudice of a Cullom which has lately pre- vailed, thro' much Inadvertency and Want of a pious Zeal and fincere Concern for Re- ligion, in the Hearts of Men , it wou'd be look'd upon as a very needlefs Work, to go about to prove the Affirmative of this Queftion. Had we liv'd in any other Age fince Chrift, the very Propofing of it ^'^ou'd have ftartled all good Chriftians. They wou'd immediately fay, I was going about to de- A X monftrate :^ ^ C4-] monftrate a felf-evident Truth, which no body doubted ; I ihou'd have met with no other Pveturn , but, Who denies it ? And it will certainly come about to this again, whenever Truth and Loyalty fliall triumph over Infidelity and Fadion. The Queftion is not, ijt. Whether we may have an Honoura- ble Remembrance of great and worthy Per- fons ; and perpetuate the Memory of fuch as have been ufefu! and exemplary in their Lives 5 by promoting the Honour of God and Religion, and the Good of their Coun- try > This was the Defign of the Diptychs in the Primitive Church, and is countenan- ced and encouraged in Scripture, which pro- pofes it as a Reward confequent to Virtue and Goodnefs in this Life ,- and fays, That the Righteous (hall he had in everlajling Re- memhrance. Nor, 2^/y, Whether we are to be well affeded to the late Revolution ? Tho' we cannot fo far limit the Power and Wifdom of God, as to fay , that he could not have delivered us by any other Means or Me- thods more advantageous ; yet whofoever confiders that it was the Hand of God , a remarkable Difpenfation of his Providence, < and the Method by which he chofe to work ' ' fo great a Deliverance for us, muft not only acquiefce in it, but return God the Glory of fo great and general a Bleffing. But, if we magni- [5] magnify It only as a Revolution^ and not as it was the faving us from Deftrudtion ; then the next Revolution may be the over- turning our whole Conftitution in Church and State. Nor 3^//y, Whether we ought to honour the Memory of King William ! All People who own the late great Deliverance thefe Nations have had from Popery and Arbi- trary Power, mud likewife acknowledge our late Sovereign, of Glorious Memory, to have been the Happy Inftrument in the Hand of God for bringing all that to pafs. And one way of exprelling our Gratitude to God, is, by an Honourable Remembrance of thofe by whom his Bleflings were convey 'd to us. So that if we fet up Statues, ere6t Trophies, raife Pyramids, ring Bells annu- ally, and magnify him in Encomiums, Dif- courfe and Hiftory, I fee nothing in all this fmful in the Nature of the Thing ; tho' it may become accidentally fo ; as particular- ly, when any thing of this is done with a difloyal or fadious Defign. Nor, 4//7/y, Whether drla^cing fuch a Health is a Sacrament ? or whether it is done Sacramentally ? But whether the very Ad-ion it felf of Drinking, applied to the N.emory of the Dead, is made Sacramental ? For if the Adion it felf is made Sacramental, then the Confequence is clear, that it muft be a horrid Abufe of it, to prophane it to any civil >^ [6] civil or common Ufe. As clear, as that if a Houfe is dedicated to God , we cannot ap- ply it to common Ufe without Prophanation and Sacrilege 5 only with this Difference, that the Defecration of the former, is a Guilt of a much deeper Dye, and of a more abominable Nature. Nor, ^thly^ Whether we may remember any abfent Friend, or our Sovereign, by wiftiing them Health and Profperity when we drink, as the Cuftom is? This may be innocently done ,• not but that one hearty and warm Ejaculation for them will do them more Service; however, by this we may flievv our good Will and our Loyalty. But the Queftion is, whether if my Friend or my Monarch were dead, I may, without Sin, perpetuate his Memory, by a Cuftom of Drinking in Remembrance of him ; and that wdth the Epithets of Dear, or Glori- ous, or Immortal, or Pious, ®f. This is what I take to be highly fmful. Now we need go no farther for the Proof of the Sinfulnefs of this Practice, than the exprefs Words of Scripture, i Cor, ii. 25-, 26. This cup is the new teflament in my blood: this do ye^ as oft as ye drink ity in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this breads and drink this cup^ ye do fhew the Lords death till he come. From which thefe feveral things are very plain. 17?, That [7] i7?, That Drinking to the Memory of ju. Perfoo dead, is the moft profound Myftery oF the Gofpel, and Foundation of our whole Chriftianity. All the Difpenfations of God from the Beginning of the World were cen- ter'd in that Death of Chrift which we drink to, and are compleated by it. Therefore he calls the Cup, The new teftament in my Hood, i. e. No lefs than that Covenant of Pardon and Salvation, which you have in my Blood (hed for you on the Crofs. zMy, That the Drinking to the Memory of a Perfon dead, is an Action made Sacra- mental; 'tis adopted into Religion, and con- fecrated to the Glorious Memory of Chrift only. And that by an exprefs Command and folemn Inftitution, Do this in remem- Irance of me. idly^ That the very Effence of the Eu- chariftical Sacrifice, confifts in that Adion of Eating and Drinking to the Memory of a Perfon once dead. 'Tis not the Drinking, nor drinking Wine and Water, or both mixt, or fitting, or ftanding, or kneeling ; no, nor the doing it religioully, or by way of Praife or Thankfgiving even to God ; all thefe are but appendant Circumftances. 'Tis in the Prinking to the Memory of Chrift's Death, in which the very Life and Being of that Sacrament confifts. 'Tis the (hewing forth the hordes death till he come^ that conlUtutes it a Sacrarpent. Tis the very Ground and Reafoq y^ ^ [8] * Reafon of the Inftitution, that which makes it myftcrious and obligatory on all Chrifti- ans, till his Coming to Judgment. If it faid here, That the very Form or effential Part of that Sacrament, is in Drink- ing to the Remembrance of Chrift's Death only, i. e, to his very Ad of Dying for us ; but that in Drinking to the Glorious Memo- ry of a dead Monarch, we mean not to ce- lebrate his Death, but the Glorious Adions of his Life ; and therefore that this can be no prophaning of that Sacrament in that very Inflance which is moft eflential to it. I anfwer, That if we could abftrad* the Perfon of Chrift from his Death ,• could ce- lebrate his Death without remembring him dead, and what he did for us when alive ; or if we could drink to the Memory of a dead Man, without implying and necefTari- ly including his Death, there wou'd be a faint Colour of an Objedion. But how can we Ihew the Lord's Death, without fhewing the Lord that died, that was alive, and then did great Things for us > And per- haps 'tis to obviate this very Objecflion, that the Words of the Inftitution are not, Do this, as oft as ye Drink it, in Remem- brance of my DEATH; but in Remem- brance of M E. Ay ! but fays one, the Cafe is ftill diffe- rent ; for Chrift is now alive , but the Mo- narch to whofc Memory we drink, con- tinues [ 9 3 tinues dead. Yes , and for that very Rea- fbn we are to celebrate him once dead, who only has Immortaiity ; and that too in a way never to be apply'd to any meerly Mortal Creattire. But away with thefe Subtilties in the mofl: important AStlon of our Lives here' ; and upon which the Salvation of our Souls hereafter fo much depends.. We re- member Chrifl:, and him.dead, by drinking in Remembrance of him ; Whofoe,yer hppe?, to be fav'd by fp dping, let him take care how'he does the. Tame to any other Perfpa, Whatfoqver. toir tho' it be not done in the fame Manner, or with the fame Pefign,. nor with the fame Circumftances ; yet tj^at ftill remains, in which the very Being and Ef- fence of our holy Eucharift coiififts. And now can it be a Doubt, wh^t;heraa ASdon fa holy ; dedicated to the Memory of our Blefled Saviour ; confecrated itp fuch. Divine Purpofes ; and niade the very Teft of' our Chrillian Profefiion, may be apply'd to common Ufe, and rhad'e an Expreition of civil Rcfpedl and Complement to the Per- fon or Charafter of whomfoQver wc pleafe to apply it to : Every fmcere Confcience, truly touch'd with aSenle of Pvcligion, will foon determine this Point without any great reach of Underiltii^ding or Jt^ Learning. The plained' and mbS-ol)vious Reafon is the ftrongeft ; and tho' it may be darkned and perplexed by a multitude of *' ' B Words, ^ [ lo] Words, or argued away ,- yet the Truth will not be totally extinguifli'd, but will re- cur again, / Tho' it be thus repell'd for a time, it will recoil with uneafinefs upon the Mind, at every ferious fit of Thinking ; and never fufFer a lading Convicflion there, till the very Confcience is defil'd, and hath no fmcere Regard for Religion left. If I Ihould ask any plain, but fmcere Chriftian, this Ihort Queftion, Whether what Chrifl; has commanded to be done facramentally and rcligioufly in Remembrance of him, may, without Sin, be done to any other Per- fon whatfoever, in Remembrance of them? He wou'd anfwer. No furely, not without Wonder and Indignation at the Queftion ; for that would be to honour a Man as I do Chrift. And this is what all the Logick in the World will never anfwer. However, to fit the Argument for the T5enius of the Difputers of this World, I will reduce the whole Conteft to a Point, in one or two Syllogifms. if Chrift has appropriated that Adion of drinking to the Memory of the Dead, to his own Perfon ; it is highly fin ful to apply it to any other. But Chrift has appropriated drinking to the Memory of the Dead, to his own Perfon, Ergk Ifup-; [ «»] I fuppofe the confequence of the Major will never be deny'd by any one who un- derftands the Terms of it. And for the Minor, 'tis prov^ ttius. If Chrifl has inftituted that Adion in Honour of himfelf, he has appropria- ted it to his own Perfon. But Chrifl: has inftituted it in Honour of himfelf. Ergo. The Minor is deny'd by no Sedl of Peo-' pie who call themfelves Chriftians, but th^ n/^ Quakers. And if any Man denies the con.- v fequence of the Major, Jet him fliew what other way there was of appropriating an Adion to the Perfon of Chrift, befides an pxprefs Inftitution, and Confecration of it into a Sacrament. Now if it be faid that they want an ex- prefs Command, that it (hall be done to him only, and not to any one elfe. I anfwer. There was no occafion for an exprefs Com- ^6 mand for that which the common Reafoa v of Mankind muft naturally fuggeft. How- ever, 'tis faid in Scripture, Thou fhalt w^r- /hip the Lord thy God^ and him only Jhalt thou ferve. And if that Action of drinking to the Memory of the Dead, be now made the moft Solemn Ad of Worfhip and Adorati- on, as it really is ; then they are not with- put an exprefs Command ,• and the apply- 6 % ing ^ C >i3 ing of that Adion to any other. Perfon, is a manifeft Tranrgreijion of this Precept. 4. And this brings me to the /ourth thing contained in thofe Texts, namely, That this drinking In Remembrance of the Dead is appropriated to Chrift, not .only, by Virtue ot a Solemn Inftitution and Com- mand, which of their own nature rcjfi rain it to him, and make it highly finful to,^p- ply it to any other Perfon ,' but there is Provificn made for this in the very Form of that Inftitution ;. and this Limitation is rnade in exprefs Words, very plain to that cffeft in the Original, tStd TTDiim^ IotIkk; oiv rnivYrrr-^ il^Thv Ifjihc^vd/uvYimv, The literal and eafy Tranilation of which is this : As oftefi as ye fliall drink thus, do it Tn Remembrance of me. The import is the fame in the Tranflatioh of our Ef^glijh BMt ; this do ye^ as oft as ye J rink it^ in Rememhrattce of me : Only with this difference, that the Drift and Defign of that ooix^^^ a,v ^vvi-n is iict fet in fo plain a light. " ■ The ufe which is generally made of that Claufe, is from thence to urge the frequen- cy of receiving the Sacrament ; Avhich ifi of it felf a thing lufficiently plain from the na- ture of it, and the infinite Advantages we receive by it. And tho' this is a good In- ference, yet it is not fo diredt as that for which the Claufe was chiefly and originally intended ; namely,' to reftrain this Adtion ■'•■■•■■ ■■■ " oi [ n ] of Drinking to the Memory of a dead Perfon^ to that of our Saviour ; and to pre- venr its ever being done to any one elfe; And to confirm this, the Word carrl^ui; is re- peated in the next Verfe , and the Reafon of this Reitridlion affign'd ; For as often at ye da this , ye fhew forth the Lord's Death ; u €*. It is an Adion confecrated-to the^ Me- mory of the Lord. . This Claufe gotx^^^ iV -^Vjit?, w^s left out of fonie Ancient Copies, and particularly the JEthiopick Verfion and Alexandrian Mann- fcript I becaufe it feem'd incoherent, nced- lefs, and to interrupt and perplex the Senfe. But this Fooltfbnefs of God is wifer than'Ment who forefaw that in After- ages an AdJiort ,fo c:onfecrated .to the raofl: Holy and Divine Pijrpofes, and ip Memory #f our Lord, . .wou'd be apply 'd to Civil and Prophane Ufe, 4S it i^ .now ipoft ihamefuliy at this Day. And it is very remarkable, that this Claufe is left out in the Inftitution of the Breadj and apply 'd only to the. Cup ; withDefign, in the Purpofe and Fore-knowledge of (jod, to be an invincible Argument to aH future Generations , for the Truth of th^t Dodrine I am now defending. As the "^ Words, Drink je ALL of this , were, no ' doubt, leveird by the fame Wifdom, at that Sacrilegious Cuftom In the Church of Rom^^ of denying tl^e Cup to the I-aity. Now [ H] Now tho* there are not thofe reftraining Words in the Confecration of the Bread ; yet if a Company of Chriftians fliou'd, af- ter Dinner, have a Piece of Bread diftribu- ted to every one of them ; and each of them,in their Turn, put it into their Mouths Vjj for the Coiividion of fuch as are in a Dif- Th pofiticn to be convinced : God has made no Provi- C M] Provifion, by way of Remedy, for Wilfulnefs and Obftinacy. Such as are felf-will'd, and abound in their own Senfe, there is no Help for them ; they muft live and die full of themfelves, and their own Opinion. Tho' we were not able to anfwer all the.- Objections which fuch Perfons make , yet this is no Reafon why we fhould part withj a plain Truth. But the Cafe is fo far otherri wife , that all the Objedions and Inftances made againft it, do but conduce to the far-, ther Confirmation of it, and fetting it in a clearer Light. ; .^ Ohj. \fl. We keep Feafts in Memory .oX the Saints. Anfvo. But not to pay them, the fame Honour we do to Chrift. And therefore, let us inftance in the grqat^ft Saint in Heaven , the Virgin Mary ; and. fuppofe that after Dinner or Supper > Wt-.. her Day , a Company of zealous and dq=»/ vout Chriftians fliou'd each of them take ^. Cup or Glafs of Wine , and in th^ir Tnmi drink it with thefe Words, Here is to the Glo^y rious Memory of the Elejfed Virgin Mary ; and : then bring themfelves off with the Popifli. Diftindlion, faying, They mean not the Ctd^i tt4$ Latrice ; no, God forbid ! They mean no \ more by it than Honouring fo great a Saiot,. to whom they are under infinite Obligati-- ons. After all their nice Difquifitions up- cn Civil , Religious , and Divine Honours^ che ^ [ ,6 ] theAnfwer would-be^in iliorr, That of alt Honours paid to her , this ought to be a- voided ; becaufe 'tis the moll fclemn way we have of Honouring Chrift himfelf : fd that this' wou'd be in it felf a worft Idola- tiry than that of the Church of Rome. The Papifts only kneel land pray to her ; but this wou'd be, in no fmali degree, applying to her that which is made the moft Sdema A^ of Worfliip and- Adoration to th^ Divi- nity. - ^ - ■'■ -^ ' *' %My^ They don^t do this Religioufly, /. e» by way of Paying K. W^t^^ptn any Divine^ Honour. But can't Men pay Divine Ho- ridur^'j'" without defigning then! fo ? Hath afiy^ thing been more common among Hea- tke^-and Papifts? And did they not both' eOer^riiake the fame Excufe for their Idola- tl^* If'they dr^nk that Health with fuch a^^figtiy this wbu'd be a grievous Aggra-' vatfon-of 'that Action, and they wou'd bfe* Mfof fe than Ti^rif Jr or fews. The Queftion is nfetrv Whether this Adion may have many * ciroimftantial Aggravations, from the diffe-' rent Ufes Men make' of it ? But whether the ' Afeion'itfelfj'Hvhich'is cpnfecrated to fo Di- vi^he-an-Ufe,' m^y be apply *d to any Civil Pfttpofe whatfoever. ' The QUeftion is not, Wlfcther they do it 'Religioufly ? But whe- ' ther Jhey ihbuld'evef do' it Otherwife than" R^igiouflyi* airf af^r the minner inftituted" byChrift* ^- • -^'^H^^-^ • -^ '' ^"' 3^y, Ano^ [ ^7] %cily, Another objeds, He has no Intent tion of prophaning the Sacrament by that > Cuftom. AH that can be inferred from this, f^ is, Therefore he is not worfe than an Hea- then. This is another Aggravation. There have been many Aggravations of that finful Adlion, as particularly, Dririking to the Glorious and Immortal Memory of a dead Mo- narch upon Men's Knees, and before his Statue ; and in thefe Words, / drink this in Rememhrance^ &c. and by the Title of Sa- njiour^ taking off their Hats when they do it 5 ^c. And there may be yet worfe Ufes made of it ; and too probably there will, by the Enemies of Revelation ; who can't be ignorant, that applying that Adion of Drinking to the Memory of the Dead ^ to civil or common Ufe, ftrikes at the very Root and Foundation of all Chriftianity ; and have already taken Occafion from this very Pradice, to fay, in Contempt of our Holy Eucharift, that it is no more than an HEALTH. The Devil has Views in palli- ating and promoting finful Cuftoms, which w^e can't fee to the End of; and no Man can tell what Confequences this will yet have^ now it is once fee on foot , or where it w ill end. 4/^/7, Another fays, Drinking to the Me- mory of a dead Monarch cannot be Sacra- ^ii mental , becaufe it has not all the Circum- v fiances of that Sacrament. Who fays it is? C "The [18] The Queftion is not. Whether it is Sacra- mental ? but whether 'tis a grievous Abufe and Prophanation of that which is truly fo > And whether it ought ever to be done but Sacramentally, and with thole Circumftan- ces of Confecration, &c. and as our Saviour did inftitute it ? ^thly, Says another, The Cafe is not s// parallel. There is no {hedding of Blood in /r the Cafe of K. PTf^A^. True ; but the Ad:ion is exacftly parallel in that very In- ftance wherein the Being of that Sacrament confifts. And 'tis that which makes it fin- ful, to ufe the fame Adion by way of Civil Honour. 6thly, Says another, We heel to God, V^ and we k^eel to Man ; and this {hews the 7 femeAaion may be us'd both in a Religious and a Civil way. True ; and fo may Drink- ing ; and what then > But neither of them in Honour of the Dead ; fo that this does not touch the Queftion ; which is not about Drinking or Kneeling to the Honour of one or the other ; for the Nature of the thing will be alter'd, as you defign a Religious, or a Civil Worlliip by either of thofe Adions. The Queftion is about Drinking m Remem- hrance of the Dead; Whether, this being con- fecrated to a Religious Worlhip, you may apply that very Adrion in that very manner, to paying a purely Civil Refped. All you have to do here, is to diftinguilli between a Cere- [«9l Ceremony- which is in its own Nature indif- ferent, and a Sacrament which is not fo • And therefore let us make the Cafe parallel, and then fee how thofe who make this Ob- je(3:ion, will like it. Suppofe, that to tha^ Text of Scripture, At the Name of Jefus, ev.ery Knee jhall lovo^ a folemn exprcfs Tnfti- tution had been added, fo as to make Kneel- ing Sacramental, in thefe Words, Do thisy as oft as ye jhall kneel^ in remembrance cf me. Wou'd Chriftians kneel in Remembrance of any other Perfon dead? Nofure; and Why? Becaufe Kneeling, from being a common Pofture of Reverence and Refpedt, whe- ther to God or Man, wou'd have alter'd its Nature, and become the mod folemn A(St of Praife and Adoration, which cou'd be paid to the Divinity. So that you fee the Objection goes upon a grofs Miftake ,• for . it is not Drinking, or Kneeling, in Honour of God or of Men, that is blameable ,• but Drinking or Kneehng to the Dead. But if it be dill objeded , that Kneeling is in that Phil, i. and lo. commanded to be perform'd to Chrift ; and therefore may not, for the fame Reafon, be us'd in Civil Worfhip. I anfwer, We -mud diftinguifli )JL between a Metaphorical Exprellion, deiign'd to denote the lowed Reverence that can be paid by all Intelligent Beings; and Drink- ing to the Memory of the Dead, which is a literal m6 pofitiveln^iixilion, C 2 But ^ ^ C « 3 But fuppofe I had faid nothing more in Anfwer to this formidable Objection, only have diftinguifli'd between KneeHng to the Ltvirtg^ and Kneeling to the Dead-, and al- lowed, that Kneeling to the Liying may be ufed in Civil Worlhip, but not to the Dead ; and by reafon of that very Text, At the name of Jefus, every knee Jhall how. And why > Becauie Bowing the Knee at the Name of a departed Perfon, is paying a Di- vine Honour ; and therefore tho'they bowed the Knee to K. Pf ';if^V m when alive, yet It wou'd be rank Idolatry to bow the Knee to the Name of K. WiMio^ m now he is dead. And if the Cafe be fo glaringly true in this Inftance, which hath neither a pofi- tive Form of Inftitution, norexprefs Words to limit the Action to Chrift alone ; how much more is it fo in that Adion of Drink- ing to the Remembrance of the Dead , which hath both ? And how plain is it, that to apply this to any other Perfon, wou'd be, in its own Nature , an idolatrous Ad:, however Men defign'd it. ythly. Another fays. He knows Drinking to the Glorious or Immortal Memory , &c. to be finful ; and therefore he drinks a Health only. To all thofe that love and honour the Memory of K, W- ji^t^fe. m. Some ftick to the firft Form, viz, to the Glorious and Immortal Memory of K. W p^(C^ tn ; to all that lovd him when alive^ cind honour his Msm(h [.I ] Memory novo he is dead. Others who are fliock'd at this, drink only to the Glorious Memory , but leave out Immortal. O- thers , To all that love and honour the Memory^ &:c. And in lliort, this Health has been put into feveral Shapes and Forms, to avoid the Profanenefs and vifible Impie- ty of it ; and every one, according to the Regard he has left for the bleffed Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, gives it yet a fofter turn. But is not this (porting with things s^ facred ? Does not every one fee, that all ' this is {till the fame horrid and impious Pro- fanation of that very Aftion which is con- fecrated to the Memory of Chrift alone. For, let them w^ord it how they will, and put it into what Form they pleafe, this no way alters the Nature of the Adion ; be- caufe 'tis ftill drinking in an honourahle Re- memhrance of the dead. 'Tis all one whether they drink to the Death of K. Wii^Sl^^ m ; to K. I V p^Cc^ m dead ; or his glorious A- (flions when alive ; or to the glorious Me- mory ; or to the immortal Memory ; or to all that love the Memory, ®c. ftill there is Application made of the Adion of drinking, to a meerMan, in that very manner which ought never to be applied but to the Perfon of Chrift. Oi^J, 8. Another Objedion is from that v/> Text of St. Paal^ i Cor. lo. zi. Te cannot n drink the cup of the Lord^ and the cttp of De- vils. > ^ ^ [" ] vils. Here fay they, the Cup of the Lor J is opposed only to the Cup of Devils ; /. ^. a Cup drank in religious Worftiip to Idols. What then ? Ergo drin^ng in honour of others, befides Chrift, is condemn.'d only as it is done religioufly, or with an idolatrous Defign. But this is all a Miftake of the Text, and of the Apoftle's Application of it. If there were no other Argument for what I am afferting, one wou'd think the very mention of this Text, fliou'd be fuffi- cient to ftrike the Confcience of any good Man, and fill him with Horror at the Thoughts of honouring the dead by drink, ing to their Memory, when he confiders, i/?, That this was fpoke to Chriftians^ who cou d not have drank that Cup which he condemns, by way of religious VVorQiip ; and if they had, the Apoftle wou'd have then charged them with downright wilful Idolatry. idly^ That Chrijlians cou'd not be fup- pos'd to have done it with intention to pro- fane the Eucharift. And this is theReafon, as appears by the Context, why the Apo- ftle informs them of the finfulnefs of what they did ; tho' they did it neither with in- tention of Idol-Worfliip, nor of prophaning that Sacrament. 3^//y, That the very Reafon of that fe- vere Expreffion, The Cup of Devils^ was becaufe they who drank the Cup of the LorJ^ LorJ^ i.e. in Remembrance of him, could not apply that Adion of Drinking,after the fame manner any other way, without the higheft Prophanation of that Holy Inftitution. To which we may add, /^thly^ That their departed Heroes were . the Deities moftly worlhipp'd by the Hea-: fA then ,• and that this Cup here condemn'd^ muft have been a Cup drank in an honou- rable Remembrance of them. For otherwife the Antithefis is loft here ; and the tw^a Cups in this Text are not rightly oppos'd one to the other ; and fo the whole Strefs of the Apoftle's Reafoning fails. This makes it a Cafe fo very like the Modern Pradlice, that whofoever confiders thofe Four Things, muft be of an Opinion, that he cannot drink the Ctip of the Lordy and the Cup of a De» parted Monarch, And for the very Reafoa aflign d in that place by the Apoflle , be- . caufe that Adion of Drinking when apply'd to the Remembrance of the Dead , is full of myfterious Signification, no lefs than the Comniunion of the Blood of Chrifi^ &c. Olj. 9. The Wine drank to the Glorious and Immortal Memory, fe'c of K. ^Tf&w, ^ is not confecrated, therefore ^tis not Sacra- ' mental. Who fays it is > Therefore they don^t drink it Rehgioufly. Who fays they do ? No ; but very irreligioufiy. Therefore they don't drink it, by way of Paying any Divine Honour. But 'tis (trange they can- not [ H ] not fee how they may Pay a Divine Honouf ^ tho' they do not defign it fo ; and that it is true that in Fad they do fo, tho'the Wine is not confecrated. The Queftion is, Whether Drinking in Remembrance of K. li^f^ibw^ be not Paying him a Divine Honour, whe- ther the Wine be confecrated, or no ; or whether they intend it, or not > Nay, tho' they openly profefs they defign no Divine Honour ; as thePapifts do, when they Pray to Saints, and proftrate themfelves in a Po- flure of Adoration before Pidures, and Rc- licks , and Statues. The Queftion is not about the Bread , nor about the Wine , or about the Confecration of either, or no Con- fecration of them ; but about the Adion of Drinking, apply'd to the Memory of the Dead ; the^Ufing of Wine to that one Pur- pofe 1^ Vvhether this was confecrated, com- manded , inftituted , dedicated by Jefus Chrift ? And if fo ; whether the making the fame Ufe of Wine, and applying that very one, only, particular, fmgle Adion, which, of all Actions on Earth, Chrift has chofen to himfelf to perpetuate the Remembrance of him thro' all Generations of Chriftians ; may be apply 'd to any other Perfon, with- out moft horrid Defecratioa and Sacrilege > And therefore, here to obviate a Hundred •^^Objedions at once : Tho' Churches and ''^z Plate, fay they, are confecrated to Divine Ufe, yet we may have Houfes to live in, wc [^5 ] we may ufe Plate, &c. in common Ufe, Yes, we may fo. But to make theObjefti- on full, and the Anfwer clear, let us take in Bread and Wine, which the' confecrated in the Eucharift, yet we may ufe Bread and Wine for our ordinary Suftcnance.. All this is granted : But then if any particular Houfe or Plate, &c, or Bread or Wine, is dedicated to God by Confecration ,- then that Houfe, Plate, &c. Bread or Wine, may not be ap- ply'd to common Ufe, without Defecration and Sacrilege ; and therefore what is left of the Bread and the Wine after Confecration, are ordered by the Church to be eat and drank before the Congregation depart. And this flievvs the Force of all my Rea- foning upon this Subjedt ; namely, becaufe that one particular Adiion of Drinking ap- plied to the Memory of the Dead, is con- fecrated into a Sacrament, and fo dedicated to the Memory of Chrift ; therefore 'tis prophane and facrllegious to abufe it to common Ufe: And more deteflably (0, than it poffbly can be in any other Inltance, except that of admitting Perfons into a vi- fible Body, by Dipping and Sprinkhng, And why ? Becaufe in all other Inftances, the Confecration is by Man ,• but in this one In (lance, 'tis immediately by Chrift himfelf, in his own Perfon, by a pofit^ve Command, and with exprefs Words of In- ftitution. D Bur, ^ [16] But, to carry this Objedion as far as ever it will go, it may be (aid, that the Adion of Drinking to the Memory ofrh^ Dead, by being repeated, becomes a different Adtion ; and To alters its Nature, as it is apply d to God or Man. But it muft be confider'd, that if it is Ten Thoufand times repeated, and apply it how and where you will , 'tis the fame Adion ftill ,• that very one, fmgle Adion confecrated to the Memory of Chrift : /ind therefore there is no Simili- tude or Parity between this and a Houfe, or Bread, or Wine, or Plate, or any other thing dedicated or confecrated to the Ser- vice of God. Nor can there be any Paral- lel, unkTs you fuppofe that there is but one Houfe, or Piece of Plate, or Cup of Wine, or Loaf of Bread in the World ,- and that too dedicated to God. And upon that Sup- pofition, tho' that one thing might be of perpetual Ufe in the Worfhip of God ; yet it wou'd be the higheft Sacrilege to apply it in any other way. If there are Ten Thou- fand Houfes, they are all different Houses ; and fome may be apply d to common Ufe, and others dedicated to the Service of God. But this being the fame Adion, tho' a Mil- lion of times repeated, which was confe- crated to the Memory of Chrift, 'tis the higheft Prophanation and Sacrilege to apply it to any other Perfon, NoWj [ V] Now, as to all other ObjedHons that may.^ poflibly be made , how many and of what Kind foever they are, I fhall only deiire thofe who make them, to polTefs their Mind^ with this one (hort Truth ; That the Adion of Drinking, apply 'd to the RememhraKce of the Deady is a Sacramental Adion ; and then they will anfwer chemfelves: And all their Reafonings mult at laft center m this, that what is now under the Gofpel "become in its own Nature Sacramental, is moft Ho- ly ; and therefore ought nei^er to be us'd otherwife than Sacramentally ; and that co ufe it otherwife, is moft impious and abo- minable. When all Objedions are anfvver'd, and not one of thefe Arguments touched, fays Xl another, I do not fee the Force of this Rea- foning. Then that is either becaufe of the natural Weaknefs, or the Prejudice of his Underftanding: There may be fome Ex- cufe for the firft, but none for the latter. And therefore here what a Man hath to do, is , to be fure that his Under .landing is as weak as he thinks it ; for other^A'ile he is inexcufable. But Hill fome fay, 'tis not my Opinion that there is any 111 in that Health ; and therefore let them forbear it, who thmk there is. This is the moft [atal and pre- vailing Error in the World, and the Rock upon which more Souls have been call a^ay, than upon any other whacfoever. But: D % Imuft I mDfl: tell them another furprifing Truth, and that is, that when thofe who are in Error come to anfwer fortheir Souls before Jefus Chrift, the Queftion will not be what Opinion they were of ? and whether they flded according to that Opinion > But what Opinion they might and would have been of, if they had uled their underdanding Fa- culties with as much Humility, Diligence, and Inipartiality in this matter, as they did in making 2 Bargain ? Is any thing plahier than the Nature of y^ Schism ; that it is a dangerous and crying ^ Sin ; and no lefs than a Man's cutting him^ felf off from a Particular National Church, in which he may not only communicate without Sin , but arrive to the greateft Perfection of Moral Virtue, and Evangeli- cal Hohnefs, that is by the Grace of God attainable in this Life ,• and that hereby he cuts himfelf off from the Body of the Catholick Church. And yet as obvious as this is, Multitudes build their Hopes of Salvation upon their not being of that Opinion, tho' at the fame time they would not cut themfelves off from a Civil Corpo- ration, in which they found their Account, for any Argument or Perfwafion upon Earth : Nay, the' all the Rules of it were not ex- a V tho' God gave them their five Senfes on pur- pofe to judge whether it is meer Bread or not; and their Reafon to manage thofe five Senfes to the bed advantage ^ and yet they will lay them all afide in this mod concern- ing and important Point ; when at the fame time, all the Sophiftry in the World cannot deceive them in a brafs Shilling. And to give but one Inftance more, is any thing more frequent among us, than for ^ Men to profefs themfelves of one Commu- ^ nion ; and yet fpeak, and ad: thro' their whole Lives in favour of another ; to vilifie and expofe it on all occafions, and run into allMeafures for the Encouragement and Sup- port of Separation ? Tho' the being thus falfe to that Communion, in which they hope for Salvation, be a Folly monftrous beyond expreffion, yet how many lamen- table Inftances are there of it in the World > All thefe, 'tis true, are of their own Opinion, and profefs to ad according to /^ it ; yet no indifferent Perfon can fay, this will be any Excufe for them in the Day of Judgment. And why > Becaufe the Quefti- on will not be whether Schism, and Idq- LATRY, ^ [ 3° ] LATRY, and that other Sin not to be com- prehended in One Word, were agreeable to their Opinion ; But whether they fuf- fer'd themielves to be fo deceived in any mat- ter Of this World ? Men are never bhnded with fuch Sophifms in the common Affairs of Life 5 and this will be the great Article of their Condemnation, who run into Er- rors in Religion thro' Wilfulnefs, or Preju- dice, or Lazinefs, and want of Thinking. Thefe are fuch Objections as I have yet heard, and now what if there were not fuch plain Proof for what I affert ; and fup- pofe that all the Objections made, cou'd not thus be put in fo clear a Light, as that every Capacity might apprehend the Weak- nefs of them ; and that in that Adion of drinking to the Memory of a dead Mo- narch, there were no more than a great Similifude or Semllance of that A6tion,w^hich all allow to be Sacramental ; and that fuch a Cuftom were by fome abufed to ill Pur- pofes, and may be yet farther abufed ; and that fuch a Pradice had but an afpedt or tendency towards lefTening the Veneration of our moft holy Eucharift in the Hearts of People, as this plainly hath : Then I ask any plain fincere Chriftian of the Laity, who hopes for Pardon and Salvation by that Sacrament, whether if fuch an Health were propos'd to him, he would not rejed it with this Anfwer ,- That he would be con- tented [3« 3 tented to celebrate the Memory of K. Ifi^tn any way in the World, but with the fame A- Becaufe the A^ion of Eat- ings thus applied to the Memory of the Dead, Is confecrated by Chrift to the Remem- brance of himfelf, and made Sacramental. So that in each of thefe Iniiances, word it: . how they will, 'tis applying a mofl: Holy Sacramental Adiion to Civil and Prophane Ufe. It will be a good Indication of their be- ^ ing touched with a confcientious Senfe of ^sC. Religion towards God, and Loyalty to their Queen , if now they have feen the Prophane and Difloyal Nature of this Health, they phufe to ce^fe that Cuftoin, and find out fomc [ ?s ] fome other Way of perpetuating the Me^ mory of fo great and publick a Benefador as K. l^fffbknfy of lefs Danger to their own Souls ; and without any ugly and invidious Glance at the Glories of the prefent Reign ,• which Pofterity will find many ways of Ce- lebrating, when this Cuftom of folemn Drinking to the Memory of the Dead ( as it is the firft Inftance of it that ever w^as known in the Chriftian World; will be tranimitted down with the blackefl: Mark of Infamy, and be juftly odious and deteftable. 2.^/v. Another Head of Self-Examination, which I wou'd recommend here, is, Whether they who take Pains to diftinguifli them- felves by laying out much of their Zeal that way, do find in themfelves the like Fer- vency and Warmth in Drinking in Remem- Irance of Chrift Jefus ; who is in a much more Exalted Senfe thtir Saviour^ and their King, For if they, of all People, fiiould be remarkable for being negligent and fcanda- loufly Rcmifs herein,- this would make all thinking and obferving Perfons look upon that prepofterous Manner of Ex- preffing their Regard for the Memo» )^ ry of a Dead Monarch, to be no o- ; . ther than a barefaced Hypocrifie, and loath- fome Prevarication with God and Man.They wou'd be apt to fufped:, that it doth not pro- ceed from any regard to Governors, whether Living or DeaJi but is, as the Apoftle fpeaks on [39] on that Occafion, only for a Cloak of MalkU mfnefs : Not from 'any exceeding Gratitude for the Bleflings of a former Reign ; but from the height of Ingratitude for thofe which have been heaped upon us in the prefent. If it is objeded by any^that the Word Sa- crament^ which I have made ufe of thro' this X( Difcourfe, is not in Scripture ; and therefore f will not bear that ftrefs which I have laid up- on it. I anfwer,That this is a Term received by the whole Chriftian Church to flgnifie an outward, vifible, bodily Action ; inftituted, appointed, ordained, eftabliflied, (^c. by Je- fus Chrift in his own Perfon ; in full and exprefs Words of Inflitution ; and with a plain pofitive Command : and Men will ne- ver find out a more apt and Significant Word for that purpofe. However,they who do not like it may lay it afide, and take any other Word inftead of it, more a greeable to their particular Humour ; for let that be how it will, they mud allow the Thing 'to be Scriptural. So that when I fay Drinking in remembrance of the Dead^ is applying that ^ outward bodily Adion Sacrament ally ; my /)^ meaning is, that this is applying of it in that very way which was inftituted, appoin- ted, ordained, eftabliflied, &c. or any other Word they pleafe. And that which makes this fo horrid an Impiety, when 'tis done to any other Perfon, is becaufe tho' that bodi- ly A<3rion of Eating or ^Drinking is in its own own nature as indifFerent as Kneeling, Bow- ing, &c. and may be apply'd any other way | yet when apply'd to the remembrance of a Perfon dead, that outward A(9:ion is made ^Sign and a 5f^/of thegreateft inward Grace and Favour that God cou'd beftow upon Man- kind ; nameIy,of the Communion of that Body we remember,/, e, of all the Benefits of Chrift's Death, Pardon of Sin, Reconcihation and Union with God, and everlafting Life here- after. And therefore how it comes to pafs, that the applying this outward Adion in that very Form and Manner, which is now under the Gofpel rendered the moft holy and ftupendious Myftery of Chriftianity, any other way than according to the Inftitu- tion, (hould prevail fo commonly among Chriftians ,• cannot but be, even to any ob- ferving Infidel, juit matter of Wonder and Amazement. r J N I s. n^ : '■WW'.