Robert W. Woodruff Library Gift of Randc11 K. Burkett EMORY UNIVERSITY Special Collections & Archives THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY The Boston Massacre. THE NEGRO AMERICAN HISTORY MEN AND WOMEN EMINENT IN THE EVOLUTION OF THE AMERICAN OF AFRICAN DESCENT BY JOHN W. CROMWELL Secretary of the American Negro Academy, Washington, D. C. WASHINGTON THE AMERICAN NEGRO ACADEMY 1914 Copyright, 1914, by JOHN W. CROMWELL 4. F. TAPLEY CO. NEW YORK DEDICATION Oh! Sing it in the light of freedom's morn, Tho' tyrant wars have made the earth a grave; The good, the great, and true, are, if so, born, And so with slaves, chains do not make the slave! If high-souled birth be what the mother gave,— If manly birth, and manly to the core,— Whate'er the test, the man will he behave! Crush him to earth, and crush him o'er and o'er, A MAN he'll rise at last and meet you as before. —A. A. Whitman. TABLE OF CONTENTS page I Discovery, Colonization, Slavery 1 II The Slave Code 6 III National Independence and Emancipation ... 10 IY Slave Insurrections 12 V Some Early Strivings 17 VI Abolition of Slave Trade 18 VII From 1816 to 1870 19 VIII Slavery—Extension and Abolition ..... 21 IX Civil War and Reconstruction ...... 23 X Educational Progress 25 XI The Early Convention Movement 27 XII Reconstruction Fails 47 XIII Negro as Soldier, a, 1652-1814 50 XIV Negro as Soldier, b, 1861-1865 ...... 54 XV Spanish-American War 57 XVI Negro Church 61 XVII Retrospect and Prospect 71 XVIII Phillis Wheatley 77 XIX Benjamin Banneker 86 XX Paul Cuffe, Navigator and Philanthropist . . 98 XXI Sojourner Truth 104 XXII Daniel Alexander Payne 115 XXIII Henry Highland Garnet 126 XXIV Alexander Crummell 130 XXV Frederick Douglass 139 XXVI John Mercer Langston 155 XXVII Blanche Kelso Bruce 164 TABLE OF CONTENTS page XXVIII Joseph Charles Price 171 XXIX Robert Brown" Elliott 179 XXX Paul Laurence Dunbar 188 XXXI Booker Taliaferro Washington 195 XXXII Fanny M. Jackson Coppin 213 XXXIII Henry Osawa Tanner 219 XXXIV John F. Cook and Sons, John F., Jr., and George F. T 228 XXXV Edward Wilmot Blyden 235 APPENDICES Appendix A—Holly 241 Appendix B—An Early Incident of the Civil War . . . 242 Appendix C—The Somerset Case 245 Appendix D—The Amistad Captives 245 Appendix E—The Underground Railroad ....... 246 Appendix F—The Freedmen's Bureau 248 Appendix G—Medal of Honor Men 249 Appendix H—The Freedmen's Bank 253 Bibliography 255 Reports 260 Chronology 261 Index 267 ILLUSTRATIONS Boston Massacre Frontispiece FACING PAGE Branding Female Slave 2 John Brown on Way to Scaffold 22 Reading Emancipation Proclamation by Union Soldier in a Slave Cabin 24 Colored Congressmen 46 Battle of Bunker Hill 50 Paul Cuffe Monument 98 The Libyan Sibyl and Sojourner Truth 112 Bird's Eye View of Livingstone College 170 Wilberforce University—Typical Buildings 122 Douglass, Payne, Dunbar, Washington 114 Crummell, Tanner, Blyden, Garnet 126 Douglass Monument at Rochester 152 Negro Industry, Tuskegee View 206 Price, Wheatley, Coppin 212 Christ and Nicodemus 222 George F. T. Cook Normal School No. 2, Washington, D. C. . . 234 FOREWORD It is not my purpose to write a history of the United States nor of any period of that history. The Negro is so interwoven with the growth and development of the American Nation that a history of him as an important element, during little more than a century of which he has been a factor, becomes a task of pe¬ culiar difficulty. In the few pages that follow, mine is a much more simple and humble task—to indicate some of the more im¬ portant points of the contact of the Nation and the Negro; to tell how the former in its evolution has been affected by the pres¬ ence and the status of the latter; and to trace the transfor¬ mation of the bondman and savage stolen from Africa to his freedom and citizenship in the United States, and to his recog¬ nition as such in the fundamental law, and by an increasing public sentiment of the country. The rise to eminence of representative men and women in both Church and State, as educators, statesmen, artists, and men of affairs, will be cited for the emulation of our youth who are iso liable from the scant mention of such men and women in the histories which they study and the books they read, to conclude that only the lowest and most menial avenues of service are open to them. Well nigh ten years ago Mrs. Charles Bartlett Dykes, formerly of the Leland-Stanford, Jr., University, while an instructor in a Summer School at the Hampton N. & A. Institute, gave this re¬ sult of studies made with six hundred colored pupils in certain near-by primary schools. She had asked two questions that were fully explained: xi xii FOREWORD (a) Do you want to be rich? If so, why? If not, why not? The answers were almost without exception, "No." The reason given was "because we cannot go to Heaven." (b) Do you want to be famous? If so, why? If not, why not? The answers were almost uniformly, "No, because it is impossible." This voiced the despair of the average colored child in the common schools right under the guns of Fortress Monroe, where the first schools for colored children in the Southland were opened nearly forty years before. A test somewhat similar, in several of the public schools in "Washington produced practically the same result. The remedy suggested by Mrs. Dykes for such a condition was the preparation of "a first book in American history, in which the story of at least twelve of the really eminent men and women of African descent" would give a stimulus to tens of thousands of youth in our schools, who in their formative period learn little or noth¬ ing of their kith or kin that is meritorious or inspiring. This necessity formally set forth by Mrs. Dykes, confirmed by my own conclusions based on an experience in the schoolroom cover¬ ing twenty years, leads me to attempt the publication of a book which shall give to teachers and secondary pupils especially the salient points in the history of the American Negro, the story of their most eminent men and women and a bibliography that will guide those desirous of making further study and in¬ vestigation. The author has not been handicapped by dearth of material in the selection of the men and the women whose careers he has aimed to trace, his main purpose having been to consider representative types whose careers afford side-lights of the growth and development of the American Negro and who at the same time are worthy of emulation. Others, perhaps, quite as conspicuous, might be preferred by some as equally deserving FOREWORD xiii of notice, yet on the whole we think it will be the verdict of competent and impartial judges that none herein named could have been excluded from consideration. Obviously only those still living could be the subjects of notice who have reached the acme of their career. The preeminence of Booker T. Washing¬ ton, because of the establishment of Tuskegee and the recog¬ nized place of industrial training in the public mind, is a fact, while the art of Tanner is conceded in salons and art galleries of America and Europe. To Dr. James R. L. Diggs of Selma University, Chaplain Theophilus G-. Steward of Wilberforce University, T. Thomas Fortune, L. M. Hershaw, Wm. C. Bolivar, Daniel A. Murray of the Library of Congress and A. A. Schomburg, he acknowledges indebtedness for many helpful suggestions in the development, progress and completion of this work. John W. Cromwell. THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY I discovery, colonization, slavery The discovery and colonization of America was primarily for greed, and this dominant principle was illustrated in different stages of the growth and development of the country. Spain, which in the sixteenth century was not only a world-wide power, but one of the greatest of modern times, bore a very important part in the conquest and settlement of the New World. It was mainly her capital, her merchantmen, that plowed the main, her capital and the patronage of her sovereigns that led. The Dutch and the English followed in the rear. Settlements in North America and the West Indies were made by her sons early in the sixteenth century, but it was one hundred years after, at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, that the English made the first permanent settlement within the continental limits of the United States of America. In the early voyages it was not at all remarkable that Negroes were found as sailors, though slaves. It is well authenticated that in the explorations of Narvaez and among the survivors of the Coronado expedition was Estevan, a black, who was guide to Friar Marcoz in 1539 in the search for the Seven Cities of Cibola. The celebrated anthropologist Quatrefages in "The Human Species" strongly intimates that Africa had its share l 2 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY in the peopling and the settlement of some sections of South America. The exception but proves the rule that the Negro came to the New World as a slave. He was stolen from or bought on the West Coast of Africa to add to the wealth of America by his toil as bondman and laborer. Slavery was first introduced in America on the island of Hispaniola (Haiti) where the aborigines of America and the West Indies had been found not sufficiently robust for the work in the mines and the plantations. Large numbers of Negroes were imported by the Portuguese, who owned the great portion of the African coast then known, into Europe a half century before the discovery of America.1 To Las Casas who pleaded the cause of the poor American Indian who had been enslaved in the New World, large responsibility for importing the Afri¬ can must be given notwithstanding the opposition of Cardinal Ximines, then regent of Spain. Las Casas lived to regret the part he played by his fateful suggestion. To supply this labor the Slave Trade, as it became known, was begun. La Bresa, a Flemish favorite of Charles Y having obtained from the king a patent containing an exclusive right of annually importing four thousand Negroes into America, sold it to some Genoese merchants who first brought into a regular form the commerce for slaves between Africa and America.2 Sir John Hawkins made three trips to America from the West Coast of Africa between 1563 and 1567, taking with him several hundred of the natives whom he sold as slaves. Queen Elizabeth became a partner in this nefarious traffic. So elated was she at its profits that she knighted him, and he most happily selected for his crest a Negro head and bust with arms tightly pinioned. It was a lucrative business and though it at first shocked the sensibilities of Christian nations and rulers, they 1 Bancroft, Vol. I. 2 Spanish Conquest of America, Vol. I. Branding a Female Slave. DISCOVERY, COLONIZATION, SLAVERY 3 soon reconciled themselves not only to the traffic, but introduced the servitude as part of the economic system of their depend¬ encies in America. That it became a fixture after its introduc¬ tion in these colonies was due to the prerogative of the Home Government rather than to the importunities of the colonists, especially because it was a source of revenue to the Crown. Within twelve years after its settlement, a Dutch man-of-war landed in September, 1619, a cargo of twenty slaves at James¬ town in Virginia. Beginning with this introduction in Virginia slavery gradually made its way into all the thirteen colonies, and received the sanction of their several legislatures. Contrary to general belief, ''Negro Slavery in the colonies never existed" nor was it origin¬ ally established by law, but it rested wholly on custom.3 "Slavery where it existed, being the creature of custom, required positive law to establish or control it." In Virginia the acts first passed were "for the mere regulation of servants, the legal distinction between servants for a term of years (white im¬ migrants under indenture), and servants for life (slaves)." The civil law rule as to descent was adopted by statute December 14, 1662. Eight years later, October 3, 1670, servants not Chris¬ tians imported by shipping were declared slaves for life. Slavery was thus legalized in this colony. In Maryland, slaves were first mentioned incidentally in a proposed law of 1638, four years after its settlement. The Swedes prohibited its establishment in Delaware, but the Dutch introduced it and gave it its first legal recognition in 1721, though it had existed in the colony as early as 1666. In North Carolina white slavery was provided for in the Locke Constitution of 1673.4 In South Carolina the first legis¬ lation respecting it was February 7, 1690, before the two colonies were separated. The charter of Georgia prohibited slavery at s Lalor's Cyclopedia, Vol. III. Holmes Amer. Annals, Vol. I. 4 Locke Brittanica Encyclopedia. 4 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY the time of the establishment of the colony by Oglethorpe in 1733, but owing to popular clamor this prohibition was re¬ pealed in 1749 and the first legislative recognition of slavery was in 1755.5 Although slavery existed in Pennsylvania from the establish¬ ment of the colony, and was due to the Germans rather than the Quakers, a protest against it was made in 1688 by the Ger- mantown Quakers. This was the first formal action against slavery since its introduction. In 1700 the legislature forbade selling beyond the borders of the State without the consent of the slave. The Dutch have also the responsibility of bringing slavery into New Jersey, where it received its first legal recognition in 1664. It was in 1626 while New York was the Dutch colony of New Netherlands that African serfdom was introduced, but it received legal recognition in 1665.6 The traffic was never di¬ rectly specifically established in Connecticut by statute, and the time of its introduction is unknown.7 In Rhode Island, May 19, 1652, the first act for the abolition of slavery was passed, but the law was not enforced. In Massachusetts slavery was incidentally recognized in 1633. In 1636, a Salem ship began the importation of slaves from the West Indies, but in 1641 it was forbidden in the fundamental law. The statutes of New Hampshire show only two legal recog¬ nitions of slavery, by acts of 1714 and 1718, to regulate the conduct of servants and slaves and masters. There was some difference between slavery in the North and in the South. This may be attributable to economic rather than to any moral causes. The African was fitted for service only as an agricultural laborer, and the character, size and loca¬ tion of the farms in New England and the Middle States in- 8 Lalor's Cyclopedia. ®Lalor's Cyclopedia. 7 Slavery in New York, an historical sketch, A. Judd Northrup. DISCOVERY, COLONIZATION, SLAVERY 5 hibited the rapid growth and extension of chattel slavery in this section, whereas the raising of tobacco in Virginia, rice in South Carolina, also cotton, favored the employment of a large number of slaves in the southern section of our country. In both North and South the status of the slave was the same. In the eyes of the law he was a thing, a piece of personal property, and the laws recognizing and regulating it were framed with rigidity and executed with severity. By 1775 more than 300,000 Negroes were in the colonies along the coast from Maine to Georgia, distributed as follows: In New England, 25,000; New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware, 50,000; in the remaining colonies of Virginia, Maryland, North and South Carolina and Georgia, 425,000. Relatively there were at this time 4'2 whites to 1 black in New England, 13 whites to 1 black in the middle colonies, while in the five southern colonies last mentioned the slave population was more than that of the whites.8 While the objection to the idea of property in man was the prevailing rule, it was by no means universal. Protests against it were by individuals rather than by communities and classes. Exception must be made as to the Quakers, whose protest in Germantown has already been instanced. They followed this up by an appeal in 1696 against any of their religious belief bringing in any more Negroes, and by their action at intervals in the eighteenth century. The majority of the men who cried aloud and spared not were the followers of George Fox. The circulation of the celebrated tract, "The Selling of Joseph" by the Colonial Chief Justice Samuel Sewall, was also a great factor in the growth of sentiment against slavery. 8 Estimated. See The Status of the Slave, 1775-1789, J. It. Brackett; The Const. History of the American People? Vol. I, F. R. Thorpe. II the slave code The Slave Code embodies statutes which show in an unmistak¬ able manner the attitude of the colonies in different times and sections toward the enslaved African. So great a shock to the Christian religion was the idea of holding property in man when first suggested, that one of the first excuses was that the African was a heathen whom slavery would convert; then when the injustice of holding a fellow Christian, in bonds was apparent, it was affirmed by statute that "conversion to or acceptance of Christianity does not presume or effect manumission either in person or posterity" so legislated Maryland in 1692, and Vir¬ ginia in 1705 endorsed the doctrine. An act was passed in 1706 to encourage the baptizing of Negro, Indian or mulatto slaves and although a Virginia statute of 1682 had freed Negroes "born of Christian parents in England, the Spanish colonies, the English colonies and other Christian lands," it was virtually repealed by an act of 1705. In the statutes of the colony of Virginia we note, "The Ap¬ pearance of Negro, Indian and mulatto slaves after nightfall in the streets without a lighted candle was forbidden and none were permitted to absent themselves from a master's plantation without written certificate." This law was published every six months at the county court and the parish churches. It was specially designed to prevent the possibility of servile insur¬ rections. Slaves accompanying their masters to free territory did not become free, ruled Lord Hardwicke and Lord Talbot in 1729; but forty-three years later Lord Mansfield in the 6 THE SLAVE CODE 7 Somerset ease declared that as soon as a slave set foot on the soil of the British Island he became free. The emancipation of the slave in many colonies was impossible only in meritorious cases except by permission from a governor for which a license had to be issued. Such an instance was where "Will" was emancipated by the General Assembly of Virginia because he had been signally serviceable in discover¬ ing a conspiracy of divers Negroes in the county of Surry for levying war on the colony of Virginia. He was the slave of Elizabeth, the widow of Benjamin Harrison. The similarity of the name to that of one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, the father of one of the Presidents and the great¬ grandfather of another, is at least suggestive. Not only was emancipation thus carefully guarded, but to steal a slave was a capital offense punishable by death. Should a slave, who resisted his master or one acting under his authority while administering punishment, meet with death, the master or his agent was not guilty of a felony. The carrying of arms either for defense or offense without special written certificate was punishable with a penalty of from 20 to 39 lashes. A statute was passed in 1764 ordering collars to be put on slaves to prevent their escape. Two unique advertisements further indicate the low estimate placed on the bondman. One from the London Gazette advertises for Col. Kirk's runaway black boy upon whose silver collar the inscription was, "My Lady Bromfield's black in Lincoln Inn Fields" and in the London Advertiser of 1756 a goldsmith in Westminster an¬ nounces that he makes silver padlocks for blacks' or dogs' collars. It could not be expected that the slave would be permitted to read and write, yet in 1744 Dr. Bearcroft1 of South Carolina refers to the purchase of two young Negroes when thoroughly qualified to become schoolmasters among their fellows. One such school was actually opened in Charleston, S. C., in which i Special Report U. S. Com. of Education 1870, p. 363. 8 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY more than " sixty young Negroes were put under instruction, two-thirds of whom were sent out annually well-instructed in religion and capable of reading their Bible, who may carry home and diffuse this same knowledge which they shall have been taught among their poor relations and fellow slaves. And in time schools will be opened in other places and in other colonies to teach them to believe in the Son of God who shall make them free." But ninety years after, in the same State it was enacted, "If any person shall hereafter teach any slave to read or write such person if a free white person, shall be fined not exceeding one hundred dollars for such offence, and imprisonment not less than six months; or if a free person of color, shall be whipped not exceeding fifty lashes and fined not exceeding fifty dollars; and if a slave to be whipped at the discretion of the court, not exceeding fifty lashes, the informer to be entitled to one-half of the fine, and to be a competent witness. And if any free person of color or slave shall keep any school or other place of instruction for teaching any slave or free person of color, he shall be liable to the same penalties prescribed by this act on free persons of color and slaves for teaching slaves to write."2 Slaves were prohibited under the penalty of death from the preparation or administering of any medicine whatever save with the full knowledge and consent of masters. There was a relaxation of these strict regulations in some of the Northern colonies. As early as 1643 and. 1646 several Negroes appear on the records of New York, then under the control of the Dutch, as land patentees.3 When enfranchised, as was possible even in those early days, he might and did obtain a freehold.4 Many scarcely appeared to know they were in bondage as they danced merrily as the best in kermis at Christ- 2 PayneV "Seventy Years." 3 Dunlop's History of New Netherlands,. Vol. I, 59. 4 Brodhead's 748. THE SLAVE CODE 9 mas and Pinkster. This, however, was exceptional. Without going into particulars the general condition was, as it has been summarized in Stroud's Slave Law: "as the incidents of slavery— First.—The master may determine the kind and degree and time of labor to which the slave shall be subjected. Second.—The master may supply the slave with such food and clothing only, both as to quantity and to quality as he may think proper or find convenient. Third.—He may exercise his discretion as to the kind of punish¬ ment to be administered. Fourth.—All power over the slave may be exercised by himself or another. Fifth.—Slaves have no legal rights of property in things real or personal; whatever they acquire belongs in point of law to the master. Sixth.—Being a personal chattel the slave is at all times liable to be sold absolutely or mortgaged or leased. Seventh.—He may be sold by process of law for the satisfaction of the debts of a living or a deceased master. Eighth.—He cannot be a party in any judicial tribunal in any species of action against the master." Ill national independence and emancipation The events that led to the Revolution and the formation of the Union quickened the public conscience and crystallized the feel¬ ing against slavery to such a degree that public men were out¬ spoken against it, societies were organized, and the work of the abolition of slavery was begun. The principle in the Declaration of Independence that "All men are created equal and endowed by the Creator with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," certainly exerted a most powerful influence. The colony of Vermont, claimed in vain at intervals both by New York and New Hampshire, and which was practically independ¬ ent of the thirteen, adopted a constitution in 1777 abolishing slavery. In 1780 Massachusetts framed a constitution contain¬ ing a provision construed by the courts as destroying human bondage, while Pennsylvania in the same year provided for gradual emancipation, though the last slave in this common¬ wealth did not die until nearly the middle of the nineteenth century. New Hampshire followed the example of Massachusetts in 1783. Ehode Island and Connecticut passed gradual aboli¬ tion laws in 1784. Thus five of the original thirteen colonies prior to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 placed them¬ selves before the world as free States, to which must be added New York and New Jersey, the former in 1799, the latter in the following year, copying their example. From the general sentiment of the time as voiced by such men as "Washington, Jefferson and Franklin, nothing seemed more 10 NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE AND EMANCIPATION 11 certain than that slavery would in a very few years be doomed to extinction. In the Continental Congress March 1, 1784, Jef¬ ferson proposed a draft ordinance for the government of the Territory of Tennessee, Alabama and Mississippi ceded already or to be ceded by individual States, to the United States, "that after the year 1800 there should be neither slavery nor involun¬ tary servitude in any of the said States otherwise than in punish¬ ment of crime." Owing to opposition of the planting interests, led by South Carolina and Georgia this proviso was lost. But three years later when Jefferson was in Paris on a foreign mission, the ordi¬ nance of 1787, by the provisions of which slavery was to be prohibited in the territory north of the Ohio, which now includes the States of Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, was adopted by the unanimous vote of the Continental Congress of the thirteen colonies.1 i Critical Period—Fiske. IV slave insurrections Slave Insurrections were a constant menace to the safety and security of slavery and the laws provided against the personal liberty of the slave; his freedom of locomotion; his right to as¬ semble in large numbers except under the supervision of the master class; his right to purchase fire arms or weapons of deadly warfare—all were enacted and enforced to prevent the possi¬ bility and the effectiveness of outbreaks for freedom. Notwithstanding these repressive measures upon the slave, the tendency of which was to make their bondage more complete and secure, there were about twenty-five recorded instances of Negro Insurrections previous to the Revolution. Among these there was one in 1687 in the Northern Neck of Virginia. As early as 1710 one was suppressed in Virginia. In 1740 one was discovered in South Carolina and what was known as the New York Slave Plot was discovered in 1741. In 1800 the insurrection of General Gabriel was only timely prevented. It was on discovery found that fully 1,000 slaves were involved and those concerned were scattered through a large section of territory. In 1822 the Denmark Vesey plot in South Carolina was only prevented from disastrous effects by the confession of a slave. So carefully had it been planned, so trustworthy, so faithful to the purpose of its promoters, that it was with extreme difficulty that the authorities could secure enough evidence to identify and to bring to trial those accused. Denmark Vesey whose name is given to this outbreak, was a most remarkable character. He 12 SLAVE INSURRECTIONS 13 was a great organizer, a man of rare intelligence, with wonder¬ ful knowledge of men and a born leader. He was also one of the last men to be suspeeted by the whites as bent on such a scheme. He exercised a dread over the blacks that facilitated the development of his plans and the confidence reposed in him by the whites never caused him to be distrusted. Peter Poyas, his chief lieutenant, was scarcely second to Den¬ mark in ability to select, drill and command. One hundred and thirty-one arrests were made, as a result of which 67 were con¬ victed, of whom 35 were executed and 37 banished beyond the limits of the United States. Notwithstanding, the effect of the outbreak was wide reaching. In "Right on the Scaffold or the Martyrs of 1822," No. 7, Negro American Academy papers, Mr. Archibald H. Grimke has given a most thrilling description of the principal partici¬ pants, the events leading up and flowing from this tragic plot of slave life in South Carolina. The prompt punishment of the participants in the Denmark Yesey Outbreak did not stamp out the spirit of resentment on the part of the most restless spirits among the slaves; for nine years afterwards, came the Nat Turner Insurrection in South¬ hampton County, Virginia. Nat Turner was born October 2, 1800, the slave of Benjamin Turner. The father who escaped from slavery finally migrated to Liberia. In his early years Nat had a presentiment that largely influenced his after life. His mind was restless, active, inquisitive, observant. He learned to read and write without apparent difficulty. He was deeply religious, he could manu¬ facture paper, gunpowder, pottery and other articles in com¬ mon use, and his skill in planning was universally admitted. As late as the beginning of the Civil War, there were tradi-, tions of his keen devices and ready wit. He was below the ordi¬ nary stature, compact in physique, with strongly marked phys¬ ical features. Contrary to general impression he was not a 14 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY preacher. His personality was not that of a criminal but of an austere, reserved and contemplative. In 1825 he said he discovered drops of blood on the corn as though it were dew from heaven, that he found on leaves in the woods hieroglyphic characters and numbers with the forms of men in different attitudes, portrayed in blood and represent¬ ing the figures he had previously seen in the heavens. July 4, 1831, was the time ■ on which he had planned to begin his work, but he hesitated until the reappearance of signs in the heavens determined him to begin Sunday, August 21, at which time he met six men. Hark, Henry, Sam, Nelson, "Will and Jack and long after midnight, after a long feast in the woods, they began the work. Armed with a hatchet Nat entered his master's chamber and aimed the first blow of death but the weapon glanced harmless from the head of the would-be victim, who then received the first fatal blow from Will, a member of the party, who without Nat's suggestion got into the plot. Five whites perished here. Four guns, several old muskets, a few rounds of ammunition, were seized. The party were drilled and maneuvered at the barn after which they marched from planta¬ tion to plantation until the attacking force numbered sixty, all armed with guns, axes, swords and clubs, and mounted. Late Monday afternoon they had reached a point about three miles dis¬ tant from Jerusalem, the County Seat, now known as Courtland. Against Nat's judgment they halted and awaited reinforce¬ ments. This delay proved the turning point in his attack. Nat started to the mansion house in search of his stragglers and on his return to the road, he found that a party of white men from the countryside, who had pursued the bloody path of the in¬ surrectionists, had dispersed the guard of eight men left at the roadside. The white men numbered eighteen under the com¬ mand of a Capt. Alex P. Peete. Although these men were directed to reserve their fire until within thirty paces, one of their number fired on Nat's crowd SLAVE INSURRECTIONS 15 at about one hundred yards and half of them beat a precipitate retreat, when Nat ordered them to fire and rush on them. The remaining white men stood their ground until Nat was within fifty yards when they too retreated. Nat pursued, wounded and overtook some of them and would have slaughtered the entire party but for the timely arrival of a company of whites in another direction from Jerusalem. With a party of twenty Nat baffled capture and endeavored to cross the Nottoway river, attack the County Seat from the rear, and procure additional arms and ammunition. This was a vain procedure. A mid¬ night attack at his rendezvous at which point he had recruited his strength, left him with less than a score of followers. The sudden firing of a gun by Hark was the signal for an ambush which caused the retreat and flight of his force. Dismayed but not disappointed, Nat endeavored once more to rally his men, but the discovery of white men reconnoitering near his rendezvous convinced him that he had been betrayed and further aggressive steps were useless. For nearly six weeks the entire county sought his capture which was finally accomplished only by accident. His trial, con¬ viction and punishment followed. Fifty-five white men were killed but not a single Negro was slain during the attack. Seventeen of the insurrectionists were convicted and executed, seven convicted and transported, ten acquitted, seven discharged and four sent on for further hearing. Four of those convicted and transported were boys. Only four free men were brought to trial, of whom one was discharged and three acquitted. Not only Virginia, but the whole country was stirred. Rumors of similar outbreaks flew thick and fast. Distant cities were put under military defense, arrests of suspects were made months after. Governor Hayne issued a proclamation in South Caro¬ lina ; Macon, Georgia, was aroused at midnight by rumors of an impending onslaught. Slaves were arrested by the wholesale, were tied to trees while militia captains took delight in hacking 16 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY at them with swords. In brief, the reprisals were bloody, ter¬ rific, in a few eases most pathetic; white sympathizers suffered in the revenge. The next session of the Virginia Legislature occasioned a pro¬ longed debate on the evils of slavery, which Henry Wilson "Rise and Fall of the Slave Power," pronounced to be the ablest, most eloquent and brilliant in the entire history of state legislation. In this discussion all the arguments for and against abolition were given as strongly and as eloquently as anti-slavery orator or agitator ever enunciated or formulated, but more rigorous laws against the free Negro and the slave were enacted and enforced, "not only in Virginia but North Carolina, South Carolina and other States." Y some early strivings It was near the close of the eighteenth century before the first signs of social life appeared in the American Negro.1 The Free African Society of Philadelphia was formed April 12, 1787. Among the organizers was Richard Allen, who became the or¬ ganizer and first bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal church in 1816, and president of the first National Convention of colored men held in Philadelphia in 1830. Absalom Jones (founder and first priest of St. Thomas Episcopal Church), was another. The first African Lodge of Free Masons, with Prince Hall as its worshipful master, was opened in Boston, its warrant bearing date September 29, 1784. In Williamsburg, Va., the first African Baptist Church was organized in 1776, and as a result of the labors of George Liele, a Negro evangelist, African churches were formed both in Augusta, and Savannah, Georgia, in the same decade.2 These were exceptional incidents in the life of a people, num¬ bering more than a half million who had hitherto no social bond, nothing in common but that they were the victims of oppression and injustice. 1 Johnston's High School History of the U. S. Thorpe—History of the American People, p. 88. The Negro Church—Atlanta Univ. Publications. The Negro Mason in Equity—S. W. Clark. 2 All race organizations were then styled African. 17 VI abolition of the slave trade After the Revolutionary War, when the colonists tried to form a Constitution they found themselves hopelessly divided over the question of one or two houses in the legislature and the basis of representation. The presence of the Negro in large numbers in the South where slavery was steadily on the increase oc¬ casioned much of the trouble. Two of the three great com¬ promises which made the Constitution a possibility bore directly on this unequal distribution of free and slave, white and black population. By the terms of the second compromise five slaves in the basis of popular representation were to be counted as equal to three white men. The third compromise permitted the foreign slave trade to continue for twenty years. The moral effect of the abolition of the African slave trade by the United States, which was determined by an act of March 2, 1807, to go into effect the first day of the following year, is borne out by the action of several European countries. Great Britain, on March 25, same year, followed the example of the United States. Sweden was the next, in 1813; the Dutch and France did the like in 1814, the latter as the result of a treaty with Great Britain, though it was not in full operation until June 1, 1819. Spain lingered until the next year, and Portu¬ gal, which had legislated for absolute abolition in January, 1815, had the time for the cessation of the trade extended to January 21, 1823, and finally to February, 1830. To Denmark, however, must be given the honor of having pioneered in the movement for the abolition of the slave trade, a royal order hav¬ ing been issued May 16, 1792, to be enforced throughout her dominion at the end of ten years. 18 VII from 1816 to 1870 The year 1816 witnessed the beginning of two divergent move¬ ments with, respect to the black population of the United States. The first was the organization by the whites of the American Colonization Society, the adoption of its constitution, December 31, and the election of its officers, January 1, 1817. Henry Clay presided at the first meeting, which was held at the Capitol, December 21, 1816. At the adjourned meeting held in the hall of the House of Representatives the constitution was adopted with fifty men as charter members. Bushrod Washington, a nephew of George Washington and one of the justices of the Supreme Court, was elected first president. This movement, paradoxical as it may be, was held to be both in the interest of slavery and freedom—of slavery, because by the contemplated removal of the free people of color from the country it would destroy the unrest and dissatisfaction of the slave with his servile condition; in the interest of freedom, because the free Negro would be transported to a land in which he would have free scope for all his activities, energies, and aspirations, unfettered by the prejudice of race and unequal competition. The other epochal event was the creation of the African Metho¬ dist Episcopal Church denomination of colored Methodist societies in Philadelphia, New York, Baltimore and the adjacent country. The black worshipers in the first-named city had been ordered up from their knees while in the act of praying, and in other places they were otherwise restricted. To save their self-re¬ spect they established churches composed entirely of their own 19 20 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY race, and in this year was the first step towards connectional union. The movement to remove systematically the free men of the country was the first step to atone for the purchase of the twenty Negroes landed at Jamestown two hundred years be¬ fore. The twenty had become in 1810, 1,369,864, of whom 183,897, were free. The Nation gave moral support to the col¬ onization movement. Colored men desirous of going to Africa were not subjected to certain disabilities. They could receive educational facilities denied other colored Americans, and they enjoyed more of the freedom of locomotion. Yet during the entire period of the colonization movement from 1820, the time of the first settlement in Africa, the numbers who have gone to Liberia, including 5,722 recaptured Africans, up to the close of the nineteenth century were not more than 22,119, and their descendants in that country did not at the beginning of the twentieth century, amount to more than 25,000.1 On the other hand, the A. M. E. Church has grown rapidly from the begin¬ ning. In 1912 it had a membership of 620,234.2 The A. M. E. Zion Church, established largely for the same reasons in 1820, had the same year a membership of 547,216,3 distributed throughout the continental part of the United States. 1 Liberia Bulletin No. 16. 2 Dr. H. K. Carroll, Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in America. 3 Ibid. VIII slavery—extension and abolition In 1820 a battle royal was fought in Congress in which the right of determining whether new territory should be free or slave was the issue. After a prolonged debate the Missouri Com¬ promise, as it is known, became a law. Missouri was admitted as a slave, Maine as a free State, and thereafter neither slavery nor involuntary servitude should be permitted in the United States north of 36° 30'. It was believed so far as Congress was concerned that the Slavery Question had been settled. Three events, however, the Denmark Yesey Insurrection of 1822, the Nat Turner Insurrection of 1831 and the organization of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833 at Philadelphia, kept the Slavery Question before the country. The Amistad Captives, who in 1839 overcame the slave traders who were bringing them from Africa to this country to sell them into slavery,1 also held the popular attention. The persistent warfare of John Quincy Adams in the House of Representatives in behalf of the right of petition; the rapid increase of slave population in the South, due to the smuggling of slaves and the struggle of the Slave Power to keep pace with the rapid growth of the Middle West and the annexation of Texas, brought the elements together again in conflict in 1850. After another prolonged debate, another compromise was adopted, by which among other things, First.—California was to be admitted as a free State. Second.—A more rigid fugitive slave law was passed. i Slavery and Anti-Slavery, W. Goodell. 21 22 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY Third.—The organization of the Territory of New Mexico with¬ out any restriction as to slavery. Fourth.—The prohibition of domestic slave trade in the Dis¬ trict of Columbia. The sentiment of the North was decidedly against the enforce¬ ment of the Fugitive Slave Law, and the South, on the other hand did not keep faith with the Compromise of 1820, which by her solid delegation in Congress, aided by a strong contingent from the North she defied by the enactment in 1854, of the Kan¬ sas-Nebraska Act. Here was an irrepressible conflict, which was accentuated by the Dred Scott Decision of the U. S. Supreme Court in 1857, delivered two days after the inauguration of President Buchanan. In Kansas the conflict was bitter and persistent, and in the end Freedom won. Both sides of the struggle between Freedom and Slavery were engaged in a polit¬ ical duel in Illinois, where Lincoln represented the idea of the National power of the country to cheek the westward extension of slavery, and Stephen Douglas championed the right to make a territory either free or slave at will. In 1859 another insur¬ rection, this time led by John Brown, a white man, with .22 followers, at Harper's Ferry, West Virginia, thrilled the country. It had most wide-reaching and permanent results, dooming slavery to extinction, although its leader and his associates paid the penalty of their lives on the scaffold. John Brown on His Way to the Scaffold. After Hovenden. IX civil war and reconstruction With the Democratic party divided, 1860 witnessed two rival presidential tickets; as a result of which Abraham Lincoln and the Republican party obtained a decisive victory in the electoral college. The triumph of the Republicans gave the South the pretext that it was seeking. The civil war followed and resulted in the triumph of the Union and the abolition of slavery. On April 16, 1862, slavery was abolished in the District of Colum¬ bia by the payment of $993,406.35; and notice having been given, September 22,1862 of his intention, if those supporting the Rich¬ mond government did not return to the Union within one hun¬ dred days, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclama¬ tion, January 1, 1863, declaring all slaves in the seceded States and Territories except in sections in the control of the Union armies henceforth and forever free. The ass'assination of President Lincoln, April 15, 1865, follow¬ ing so closely upon the Fall of Richmond and the Surrender of Lee at Appomattox, precipitated a long and bitter conflict be¬ tween Congress and Andrew Johnson, Lincoln's successor in office. April 9, 1866, a Civil Rights Law was enacted, confer¬ ring certain fundamental civil rights upon the emancipated race —the right to sue and be sued, to hold property, and to testify in the courts. The States lately in rebellion passed vagrant acts which virtually reenacted many of the objectionable features of the Slave Code, and Congress decided to protect by legislation and constitutional enactments those freed by the sword. The 23 24 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY Thirteenth Amendment, constitutionally legalizing emancipa¬ tion, became a part of the Constitution, December 18, 1865; the Fourteenth Amendment, defining citizenship and declaring all Negroes to be citizens of the United States and of the States in which they reside, became incorporated in the Constitution July 18, 1868. The right of franchise was given the Negro, first in the States that were engaged in rebellion by the Reconstruction Act organizing the seceded States, which passed March 2, 1867, and through the Fifteenth Amendment, preventing any denial of the right of suffrage on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude. This amendment was ratified March 30, 1870, and applied to the entire country. With its em¬ bodiment in the fundamental law and the restoration of all the States lately in rebellion to their constitutional rights and representation within the Union, the work of reconstruction was supposed to be complete. Reading Emancipation Proclamation by Union Soldier in a Slave Cabin. X educational progress One of the laws most rigidly enforced south of Mason and Dixon's Line was that prohibiting the teaching of colored people to read and write. There was no greater, no more ardent desire on their part than to obtain an education. Every artifice to evade this law and to obtain by stealth an education was em¬ ployed. During the Civil War philanthropic associations fol¬ lowed victorious armies, and schools were opened in the centers of Negro population all over the South Old and young flocked to these, all eager to get an education. "While not under the oper¬ ation of positive law, they enjoyed, nevertheless, a kind of n£u- . tional governmental supervision—that of the Freedmen's Bureau.1 The teachers as a rule were Northern young men and women, especially the latter, who were fired with enthusiasm for the work and exhibited the self-denying consecration of the foreign missionary. The progress of the pupils in these schools was phenomenal. The establishment of normal schools and acad¬ emies at which the brightest of the colored youth could be pre¬ pared for the work of teachers rapidly followed. Almost about the same time Howard University at Washington, Atlanta Uni¬ versity in Georgia, Fisk University at Nashville, Straight Uni¬ versity in New Orleans, Shaw University at Raleigh, Colver Insti¬ tute in Richmond, Va., Wayland Seminary in Washington— these last two now merged in the Union University at Richmond, Va., and Hampton Institute, were established—all the outgrowth of missionary effort or philanthropy. In faculty and other equip- i See Appendix. 25 26 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY ment these sehools matched the secondary institutions at the South for the whites. Thus was laid the foundation for the schoolteachers, the doctors, lawyers and ministers of the gospel needed in the popular instruction, professional work, the religious and secular leadership of the Negro. From the private philan¬ thropy that maintained these schools were evolved the Peabody, Slater and Hand Funds, and in later years the General and the Southern Educational Board and the Jeanes Educational Fund. The common schools of the South came into being with the reconstruction of the new State governments, and may be said to have had a fair beginning with the year 1871. Four of the State Superintendents of Instruction in the period of Reconstruc¬ tion were colored men, Rev. now Bishop J. W. Hood in North Carolina, Thomas W. Cardozo in Mississippi, William G. Brown in Louisiana, and Rev. Jonathan G. Gibbs of Florida. It may be claimed without fear of successful contradiction that the es¬ tablishment of the common school in the South is attributable to the political forces which the Negro's vote placed in power. XI the early convention movement With the period immediately following the Second War with Great Britain, begins a series of events which indicate a pur¬ pose of the nation to make the condition of the free man of color an inferior status socially and politically. That this was resisted at every step, revealed more clearly the national aim and purpose In 1820 the passage of the Missouri Compromise permitted the westward extension of slavery and as far north as 36° 30'. Local legislation, harmonizing with this national action against extending the domain of freedom and making the country unde¬ sirable for the colored freeman, followed. Two years after the enactment of the compromise, "the martyrs of 1822" went bravely and heroically to their fate in South Carolina. In 1827, the Empire State completed its work of emancipation of the slave, begun 28- years before, and saw the birth of Free¬ dom's Journal, the first Negro newspaper within the limits of the United States, edited by John B. Russwurm1 and Samuel E. Cornish. In 1831, Virginia was convulsed and the entire South¬ land shocked by the Insurrection of Nat Turner. In the State of Ohio along the Kentucky border, the feeling against the free Negro had become acute. Mobs occurred, blood was shed and the people were compelled to look to some spot where they could abide in peace. In these stirring times the Convention Movement came into i First college-bred Negro, Bowdoin College, one year after Longfellow and Hawthorne. 27 28 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY existence. The forces which, it evoked were conserved and corre¬ lated until the dynamics of Civil Revolution had wrought desola¬ tion and destruction far and wide, sweeping away forever what had been a basis of the social and political strength of the Na¬ tion. A glance at the list of the officers of this pioneer deliberative convention of colored people of which we have as yet any data, shows that the men who led in this meeting were among the fore¬ most colored citizens whose names have come down to us from that distant past.2 James Forten was President, and Russell Parrott, the assistant to Absalom Jones at St. Thomas, P. E. Church, was the Secretary. Prominent also in this anti-coloniza¬ tion convention, were Absalom Jones, Richard Allen, Robert Douglass, and John Gloucester—the first settled pastor of a colored Presbyterian Church. This Convention of 1830 was the first conscious step toward con¬ certed action and was in no sense local in its conception, its con¬ stituency or its purpose. The prime mover was Hezekiah Grice, a native of Baltimore. In his early life, he had met Benjamin Lundy, and in 1828-9, William Lloyd Garrison, editors and publishers of The Genius of Universal Emancipation, published at that time in Balti¬ more. In the spring of 1830 he wrote a circular letter to prom¬ inent colored men in the free States requesting their views on the feasibility and imperative necessity of holding a convention of the free colored men of the country, at some point north of Mason and Dixon's Line, for the exchange of views on the ques¬ tion of emigration or the adoption of a policy that would make living in the United States more endurable. For several months there was no response whatever to this circular. In August, however, he received an urgent request for him to come at once 2 The first public demonstration of hostility to the colonization scheme was made January 24, 1817, by free colored inhabitants of Richmond, Va. Garrison's "Thoughts on African Colonization." THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 29 to Philadelphia. On his arrival there he found a meeting in session, discussing conflicting reports relative to the openings for colored people as emigrants to Canada. Bishop Richard Allen, at whose instance he was in Philadelphia, subsequently showed him a printed circular signed by Peter "Williams, the rector of St. Philip's Church, New York, Peter Vogelsang and Thomas L. Jennings of the same place, approving the plan of a convention. This approval decided the Philadelphians to take definite action, and they immediately " issued a call for a Con¬ vention of the colored men of the United States to be held in the city of Philadelphia, on the 15th of September, 1830." "When the time came the Convention assembled in Bethel Church, the historic building in which was laid the foundation of the A. M. E. denomination. The Convention was organized by the election of Bishop Allen as President, Dr. Belfast Burton of Philadelphia and Austin Steward of Rochester, N. Y., as Vice Presidents, Junius C. Morell, Secretary, and Robert Cowley, Maryland, Assistant Secretary. Seven States were represented by duly accredited delegates as follows:3 Pennsylvania—Richard Allen, Belfast Burton, Cyrus Black, Junius C. Morell, Benjamin Paschall, James Cornish, William Whipper, Peter Gardiner, John Allen, James Newman, Charles H. Leveck, Frederick A. Hinton; New York—Austin Steward, Joseph Adams, George L. Brown; Connecticut—Scipio Augus¬ tus; Rhode Island—George C. Willis, Alfred Niger; Mart- land—James Deaver, Hezekiah Grice, Aaron Willson, Robert Cowley; Delaware—Abraham D. Shadd; Virginia—Arthur M. Waring, William Duncan, James West, Jr. Besides there were these honorary members: Pennsylvania—Robert Brown, William Rogers, John Bowers, Richard Howell, Daniel Peterson, Charles Shorts; New York— Leven Williams; Maryland—James P. Walker, Rev. Samuel s Anglo-African Magazine, 1859. 30 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY Todd, John Arnold; Ohio—John Robinson; New Jeeset—Samp¬ son Peters; Delaware—Rev. Anthony Campbell and Dan Caro¬ ls Hall. They may well be called the first ''forty immortals" in our Valhalla. The question of emigration to Canada West, after an ex¬ haustive discussion which continued during the two days of the convention's sessions, was recommended as a measure of relief against the persecution from which the colored American suffered in many places in the North. Strong resolutions against the American Colonization Society were adopted. The formation of a parent society with auxiliaries in the different localities repre¬ sented in the convention, for the purpose of raising money to defray the object of purchasing a colony in the province of Upper Canada, and ascertaining more definite information, having been effected, the convention adjourned to reassemble on the first Monday in June, 1831, during which time the order of the con¬ vention respecting the organization of the auxiliary societies had been carried into operation. At the assembling of the convention in 1831, which was fully reported in The Liberator, the officers elected were, John Bowers, Philadelphia, President, Abraham D. Shadd and Wil¬ liam Duncan, Vice Presidents, William Whipper, Secretary, Thomas L. Jennings, Assistant Secretary. The roll of delegates reveals the presence of many of the pioneers. Hezekiah Grice did not attend—in fact he was never subsequently a delegate, for two years later he emigrated to Haiti, where he became a foremost contractor. Richard Allen had died, after having completed a most remarkable career. Rev. James W. C. Pennington, who for forty years afterward bore a conspicuous place as a clergyman of sound scholarship, was a new figure and thenceforth an active participant in the movement. This convention aroused no little interest among the foremost THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 31 friends of the Negro and was visited and addressed by such men as Rev. S. S. Jocelyn of New Haven, Benjamin Lundy and Wil¬ liam Lloyd Garrison. In the "Life of Arthur Tappan," by his brother Lewis Tappan, we find the following: "A convention of people of color was held in Philadelphia in 1831 of delegates from several States to consult upon the common interest. It was numerously attended and the proceedings were conducted with much ability. A resolution was adopted that it was expedient to es¬ tablish a collegiate school on the manual labor system. ... A com¬ mittee appointed for the purpose made an appeal to the benevolent. . . . New Haven was suggested as a suitable place for its loca¬ tion . . . Arthur Tappan purchased several acres of land in the southerly part of the city and made arrangements for the erection of a suitable building and furnished it with needful supplies in a way to do honor to the city and country . . . The people of New Haven be¬ came violently agitated in opposition to the plan. The city was filled with confusion. They seemed to fear that the city would be overrun with Negroes from all parts of the world ... A public meeting called by the Mayor September 8, 1831, in spite of a manly protest by Roger S. Baldwin, subsequently Governor of the State and U. S. Senator from Connecticut, adopted the following: "Resolved, by the Mayor, Aldermen, Common Council and free¬ men of the city of New Haven, in city meeting assembled, that we will resist the establishment of the proposed college in this place by every lawful means." The attempt at the founding of a college in Connecticut was abandoned. The Prudence Crandall incident disgraced the name of Connecticut at the same period. What was a kind of National Executive Committee, and known as the Convention Board, issued the calls for the conventions from time to time. When the next convention was held in 1832, there were eight States represented with an attendance of thirty delegates, as fol¬ lows: Maryland had 3; Delaware, 5; New Jersey, 3; Pennsyl- 32 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY vania, 9; New York, 5; Connecticut, 2; Rhode Island, 1; Massa¬ chusetts, 2. Beginning June 4th, it continued in session until the 15th. The question exciting the greatest interest was one which pro¬ posed the purchase of other lands for settlement in Canada; for 800 acres of land had already been secured, two thousand indi¬ viduals had left the soil of their birth, crossed the line and laid the foundation for a structure which promised an asylum for the colored population of the United States. They had already erected two hundred log houses and 500 acres of land had been brought under cultivation. But hostility to the settlement of the Negro in that section had been manifested by Canadians, many of whom would sell no land to the Negro. This may explain the hesitation of the convention and the appointment of an agent whose duty it was to make further investigation and report to a subsequent convention. Opposition to the colonization movement was emphasized by a strong protest against any appropriation by Congress in behalf of the American Colonization Society. Abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia was also urged at the same convention. This was one year before the organization of the American Anti- Slavery Society. There were fifty-eight delegates present when the convention assembled June 3, 1833. The States represented were Pennsyl¬ vania, Maryland, New Jersey, Delaware, Massachusetts, Con¬ necticut and New York. Abraham D. Shadd, then of Washing¬ ton, D. C., was elected President. The usual resolutions and addresses to the people were framed and adopted. In addition to these, the law of Connecticut, but recently passed, prohibiting the establishment of literary insti¬ tutions in that State for the instruction of persons of color of other States was specifically referred to, as well as a resolution giving the approval of the mission of William Lloyd Garrison to THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 33 Europe to obtain funds for the establishment of a Manual Train¬ ing School. The emigration question was again thoroughly discussed. A committee was appointed to look into the matter of the encourage¬ ment of settlement in Upper Canada and all plans for coloniza¬ tion anywhere were rejected. A general convention fund was provided for, also a schedule showing the population, churches, day schools, Sunday Schools, pupils, temperance societies, benevolent societies, mechanics and store-keepers. A most significant action was one recommending the establishment in different parts of the country of Free Labor Stores at which no produce from the result of slave labor would be exposed for sale. The next year, 1834, the convention met in New York, June 8th, with Henry Sipkins as President. There were seven States represented and about 40 delegates present. The usual resolu¬ tions were adopted, one commending Prudence Crandall * to the patronage and affection of the people at large; another urging the people to assemble on the fourth of each July for the purpose of prayer and the delivery of addresses pertaining to the con¬ dition and welfare of the colored people. The foundation of so¬ cieties on the principle of moral reform and total abstinence from intoxicating liquors was advocated. Moreover, every person of color was urged to discountenance all boarding houses where gam¬ bling was permitted. At the same convention the Phoenix Societies came up for special consideration and were heartily commended. These planned an organization of the colored people in their municipal subdivisions with the special object of the promotion of their improvement in morals, literature and the mechanic arts. Lewis Tappan refers to them in the biography previously referred to. The 1 'Mental Feast" which was a social feature, survived thirty years later in some of the interior towns of Pennsylvania and the * See Appendix. 34 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY West. General Superintendent Christopher Rush of the A. M. E. Zion, was the president of these societies. Rev. Theodore S. Wright, the predecessor of Rev. Henry Highland Garnet at the Shiloh Presbyterian Church, New York, and who enjoys the unique reputation of claiming Princeton Seminary as his Alma Mater, was a vice president. Among its directors were Boston Crummell, the father of Alexander Crummell, Rev. William Paul Quinn, subsequently a bishop of the A. M. E. Church, and Rev. Peter Williams. These names suggest that the Phoenix Society movement was a somewhat widespread institution. Unfor¬ tunately, there was lost during the excitement of the New York Draft Riots of 1863, nearly all the documentary data for an interesting sidelight on the Convention Movement, through the study of these societies. With 1835, the Convention returned to Philadelphia; June 1-5 was the time of its sessions. There were forty-four delegates en¬ rolled, with Reuben Ruby of Maine, as president, John F. Cook of the District of Columbia, was Secretary. Speaking of its proceedings "The Liberator" says: "Its pages offered abundant testimony of the ability of this body to set before the Nation a detail of the wrongs and grievances to which they are by custom and law subjected, and they also exhibit a praiseworthy spirit of manly and noble resolution to contend by moral force alone until their rights so long withheld shall be restored." Among other specially notable things, Robert Purvis and Fred¬ erick A. Hinton were appointed a committee to correspond with dissatisfied emigrants to Liberia and to take such action as would best promote the sentiment of the colored people respecting the work of the Colonization Society; the students of Lane Seminary at Cincinnati were thanked for their zeal in the cause of aboli¬ tion. Temperance reform was advocated in a stirring address to the people; and the free people of color were recommended to petition Congress and their respective state legislatures to be ad- THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 35 mitted to the rights and privileges of American citizenship, and to be protected in the enjoyment of the same. William Whipper advocated that the word "colored" should be abandoned and the title "African" should be removed from the name of the churches, lodges, societies and other institutions. In 1836, in the columns of The Liberator appear calls for two conventions; the regular annual convention was called to meet in Philadelphia, June 6, by Henry Sipkins of the Conven¬ tion Board, and the urgent language of the call implies doubt in the interest of the people or the probability of their prompt response to the call. William Whipper issued the call, through the same medium, for the Convention of the American Moral Re¬ form to meet August 2, 1836, also in Philadelphia. Careful perusal of the files of The Liberator fails to disclose a com¬ ment on the proceedings of either convention. But the per¬ sonnel of the officers of the American Moral Reform shows the influential men of the Convention Movement at their helm. James Forten, Sr., the Revolutionary patriot, was the President, Reuben Ruby, Rev. Samuel E. Cornish, Rev. Walter Proctor and Jacob C. White, Sr., of Philadelphia, were Vice Presidents, Joseph Cassey was Treasurer, Robert Purvis, Foreign Cor¬ responding Secretary and James Forten, Jr., Recording Sec¬ retary. The address was drawn up by William Watkins of Baltimore, who two decades later was an able colleague of Frederick Doug¬ lass in the conduct of The North Star. In 1837, the Convention of the. American Moral Reform was again held in Philadelphia, August 19th, in which William Whipper, John P. Burr, Rev. John F. Cook, who delivered an address on Temperance, and James Forten, Jr., were leading spirits. Sufficient has been stated to show that the convention move¬ ment was deeply rooted in the thought of the disfranchised American. The fact that there was a lull does not at all dis- 36 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY prove this contention. The conventions were great educators, alike of the Negro and the American whites. They taught the former parliamentary usages and how to conduct deliberative bodies. They brought to light facts pertaining to the Negro's status which tended to establish that he was thrifty and steadily improving as a moral and economic force; while the American whites had in them an object lesson from which they learned much. In his ''Autobiography of a Fugitive Negro," Samuel Ringgold "Ward4 says: "A State or a National Convention of black men is held. The talent displayed, the order maintained, the demeanor of the delegates, all impress themselves upon the community. All agree that to keep a people rooted to the soil who are rapidly improving, who have already attained consider¬ able influence and are marshaled by gifted leaders (men who show themselves qualified for legislative and judicial positions), and to doom them to a state of perpetual vassalage is altogether out of the question." The work of unifying the race along right lines now pro¬ ceeded with the holding of State Conventions. There was a state Temperance Convention of the colored men of Connecticut, held at Middletown, 1836, followed by a call for a New England Convention at Boston in October. Reference to its proceedings shows a prior convention held at Providence, R. I., in May. At the Boston Convention a ringing appeal was made to the people, for total abstinence from all intoxicants, and almost immediately thereafter, local meetings were held for the purpose of putting in practical operation the principles enunciated. Not only in New England, but in the Middle and "Western States, local conven¬ tions were held during this and the next decade. The following extracts from a letter dated Dec. 21, 1901 from the veteran educator, Peter H. Clark, of Cincinnati and St. Louis, Missouri, shed a flood of light upon this early movement: * Pronounced by Daniel Webster "the ablest thinker on his legs before the American public." THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 37 My Dear Sir :— The people of Ohio held conventions annually for more than thirty years. Usually they printed their proceedings in pamphlets. A peculiarity of the Ohio conventions was that they were meant to improve the condition of the colored people of that State. The con¬ ventions of those residing in the more eastern States were simply anti- slavery conventions, and their memorials and protests were aimed at slavery. The first conventions of the men of Ohio were self-helpful. By their own sacrifices and with the help of friends, they purchased lots and erected school houses in a number of towns, or they organized schools and located them in churches. Active in this work were the Yancy's, Charles and Walter, Gideon and Charles Langston (brothers of John M.), George Carey, Dennis Hill, and chief among them, David Jenkins. Walter Yancy was the agent of these men, traveling and organizing societies and schools, col¬ lecting funds, etc. As a result of this self-helping movement, a number of farming communities were established, some of which accumulated large areas of land, and in Cincinnati, The Iron Chest Company accumulated funds and in 1840 erected a block of buildings which still stands. Later, the action of the Convention was directed against the Black Laws of Ohio. These were repealed in 1849, and colored children were permitted to share in the benefits of the school funds, though in sepa¬ rate schools. The same legislature elected Salmon P. Chase to the United States Senate. The movement thus detailed was the result of a bargain between the Democrats of Ohio and the Free Soilers. Afterwards the force of these conventions was directed against discriminations against colored people which still existed on the statute books. Sometimes this force took the shape of petitions, memorials, protests, and after the organization of the Ohio Equal Rights League, it took the shape of legal proceedings, etc. One of the most memorable of these conventions was held in 1852, when John M. Langston delivered the best speech of his life, defending the thesis, "there is a mutual repellency between the white and black races of the world." The materials for the speech were collected by Charles Langston, 38 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY but John made the speech. Time has vindicated the position taken by Mr. Langston in that memorable address. It was the beginning of the Emigration Movement in which Dr. Martin R. Delaney afterwards be¬ came prominent. Effective national conventions have not been numerous in the past fifty years. One of the most notable met at Rochester in 1853. Frederick Douglass presided and I had the honor of being the secretary. It was reported that Mrs. Stowe desired to give a portion of her earnings from "Uncle Tom" for the founding of a school for the bene¬ fit of the Afro-American, and this convention was called to formulate an advisory plan. The plan when formulated, was practically what Mr. Washington realized many years afterwards at Tuskegee. . . . The Rochester movement came to naught, but its influence upon the colored people of the country was wide spread, chiefly because of the character of the men who composed it. Its proceedings were published in the "North Star," and so far as I know, nowhere else. The files of that paper were destroyed with Mr. Douglass' Rochester house, and, unless in the Congressional Library, no copy now exists. The convention at Syracuse, 1864, was another note-worthy assem¬ blage. It was the formulation of a plan of organization known as the National Equal Rights League. The rivalry between Mr. Douglass and Mr. Langston prevented the wide usefulness of which the organiza¬ tion was capable. Ohio, Pennsylvania and Illinois organized auxiliary State leagues, and in each State much good was done. Mr. Langston, president elect of the National Organization, never called it together. . . . It will take time and thought for the compilation of such a list. The men who officiated in the conventions of which I have written, were mostly small men, great only in their zeal for the welfare of their people. Within these ten years from 1837 to 1847, a new figure ap¬ pears on the scene, a man, though not born free like Paul, yet like the chief captain, obtained it at a great price. The THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 39 career of Frederick Douglass was but preliminary prior to his return from England, and his settlement at Rochester, N. Y., as editor of The North Star. By a most remarkable coin¬ cidence, the very first article in the first number of The North Star published January, 1848., is an extended notice of the National Colored Convention held at the Liberty Street Church, Troy, New York, October 9, 1847. Nathan Johnson was president. There were 67 delegates. From New York, 44; Massachusetts, 15; Connecticut, 2; Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Vermont, Kentucky and Michigan, 1 each. The presence of one delegate, Benjamin Weeden, from a large constituency, Northampton, Mass., whose credentials stated the fact that a large number of white citizens sympathizing with the objects of the call had formally expressed their endorsement of the movement, was a signal for hearty applause. A most spirited discussion arose on the report of the Com¬ mittee of Education as to the expediency of the establishment of a college for colored young men, which was discussed pro and con by arguments that can not be surpassed even after a lapse of more than half a century. The report gives unstinted praise to the chairman5 of the committee for his scholarly style, his choice diction and his grace of manner. The next year, September 6, 1848, between sixty and seventy delegates assembled at Cleveland, Ohio, in the National Conven¬ tion, the sessions alternating between the Court House and the Tabernacle. Frederick Douglass was chosen President, John Jones of Illinois, Allen Jones of Ohio, Thomas Johnson of Michi¬ gan and Abner Francis of New York, were Vice Presidents, "Wil¬ liam Howard Day was the Secretary, with William H. Burnham and Justin Hollin, Assistants. At the head of th« business com¬ mittee stood Martin R. Delaney. The line of policy was not de¬ flected. As in previous conventions, education was encouraged, 5 Alexander Crummell. 40 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY the importance of statistical information emphasized and temper¬ ance societies urged. As showing the representative character of the delegates, the diversity of occupations, employment and the professions fol¬ lowed, the fact was developed that there were printers, carpenters, blacksmiths, shoemakers, engineers, dentists, gunsmiths, editors, tailors, merchants, wheelwrights, painters, farmers, physicians, plasterers, masons, college students, clergymen, barbers, hair¬ dressers, laborers, coopers, livery stable keepers, bath-house keepers and grocers among the members of the convention. But of all the conventions of the period, the largest, that in which the ability of its members was best displayed in the broad and statesmanlike treatment of the questions discussed and the practical action which vindicated their right to recog¬ nition as enfranchised citizens, and the one to which the at¬ tention of the American people was attracted as never before, was the one held in the city of Rochester, N. Y. With greater emphasis than at prior meetings, this convention set the seal of its opposition against any hope for permanent relief to the con¬ ditions under which the colored freeman labored by any com¬ prehensive scheme of emigration. Because of this, it directed its energies to affirmative, constructive action. In the enunciation of a philosophy able, far-sighted and states¬ manlike, contained in the address to the American people, we behold the wisdom of a master mind—one then at the prime of his intellectual and physical powers, Frederick Douglass, the chairman of the Business Committee. Among the important things done by the convention might be enumerated. It says: "We can not announce the discovery of any new principle adopted to ameliorate the condition of mankind. The great truths of moral and political science upon which we rely, and which press upon your consideration, have been evolved and enunciated by you. We point to your principles, your wisdom and your great example as the full THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 41 justification of our course this day. That all men are created equal; that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the right of all; that taxation and representation should go together; that the Constitution of the United States was formed to establish justice, promote the gen¬ eral welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to all the people of the country; that resistance to tyranny is obedience to God—are American principles and maxims, and together they form and constitute the con¬ structive elements of the American government." 1. The plan for an industrial college on the manual labor plan, was approved, and Harriet Beecher Stowe, who was about to make a visit to England at the instance of friends in that country, was authorized to receive funds in the name of the colored people of the country for that purpose. The successful establishment and conduct of such an institution of learning, would train youth to be self-reliant and skilled workmen, fitted to hold their own in the struggle of life on the con¬ ditions prevailing here. 2. A registry of colored mechanics, artisans and business men throughout the Union, was provided for, also, of all the persons will¬ ing to employ colored men in business, to teach colored boys mechanic trades, liberal and scientific professions and farming, also a registry of colored men and youth seeking employment or instruction. 3. A committee on publication "to collect all facts, statistics and statements. All laws and historical records and biographies of the colored people and all books by colored authors." This committee was further authorized "to publish replies to any assaults worthy of note, made upon the character or condition of the colored people." This was in keeping with what had actually been done by the colored peo¬ ple of the State of New York the year previous, after its Governor, Ward Hunt, had substantially recommended the passage of black laws which would have forbidden the settlement of any blacks or mulattoes within its borders and placed further restrictions on those at that time citizens. The charge of unthrift against the Negro was utterly dis- proven by a comparative statement showing that in those places in which the conditions were the worst, New York, Brooklyn and Williams¬ burg, the Negro had increased 25 per cent, in population in twenty years and 100 per cent, in real estate holdings. 42 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY In thirteen counties the amount owned by colored persons was ascertained to be $1,000,000. Capital in Business.—New York, $755,000; Brooklyn, $79,- 200; Williamsburg, $4,900. Total $839,100. R.tsat, Estate Exclusive of Incumbrance.—New York, $733,- 000; Brooklyn, $276,000; Williamsburg, $151,000. Total $1,- 160,000. The convention crowned its work by a more comprehensive plan of organization than those of twenty years before. A national council was provided for to be "composed of two members from each State by elections to be held at a poll at which each colored inhabitant may vote who pays ten cents as a poll tax, and each State shall elect at such election delegates to State conventions twenty in number from each State at large." The detail of this plan shows that the methods of the Afro- American Council of 1895, is an almost exact copy of the National Council of 1853. The chairman of the committee which formulated this plan was William Howard Day and other members were Charles H. Langston, George B. Yashon, William J. Wilson, William Whipper and Charles B. Ray, all of them men of more than ordinary intelligence, information and abil- ity. But those who saw only in emigration the solution of the evils with which they were beset, immediately called another con¬ vention to consider and decide upon the subject of emigration from the United States. According to the call, no one was to be admitted to the convention who would introduce the subject of emigration to any part of the Eastern Hemisphere, and op¬ ponents of emigration were also to be excluded. Among the signers to the call in and from the States of Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, Indiana, Canada and California were: Rev. Wil¬ liam Webb, Martin R. Delaney, Pittsburg, Pa., Dr. J. J. Gould Bias and Franklin Turner of Philadelphia, Rev. Augustus R. Green of Allegheny, Pa., James M. Whitfield, New York, William THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 43 Lambert of Michigan, Henry Bibb, James Theodore Holly of Canada and Henry M. Collins of California. Douglass in his paper The North Star, characterized the call as uncalled for,—unwise and unfortunate and prema¬ ture. As far too narrow and illiberal to meet with acceptance among the intelligent. "A convention to consider the subject of emigration when every delegate must declare himself in favor of it beforehand as a condition of taking his seat, is like the handle of a jug, all on one side. "We hope no colored man will omit during the coming twelve months an opportunity which may offer to buy a piece of property, a house lot, a farm or any¬ thing else in the United States which looks to permanent resi¬ dence here." James M. Whitfield of Buffalo, N. Y., the Negro poet of America, and one of the signers of the call, responded to the at¬ tacks in the same journal. Douglass made a reply and Whitfield responded again, and so on until several articles on each side were produced by these and other disputants. The articles were collected and published in pamphlet form by Rev. and Bishop James Theodore Holly of Port au Prince, Haiti, making a valu¬ able contribution to literature, for I doubt if there is anywhere throughout the range of controversial literature anything to sur¬ pass it. Bishop Holly gives further information respecting this con¬ vention. In a private letter he says: "The convention was accordingly held. The Rev. William Munroe was President, the Rt. Rev. [William] Paul Quinn, Vice President, Dr. Delaney, Chairman of the Business Committee and I was the Secre¬ tary. . . . "There were three parties in that Emigration Convention, ranged according to the foreign fields they preferred to emigrate to. Dr. Delaney headed the party that desired to go to the Niger Valley in Africa, Whitfield the party which preferred to go to Central America, and Holly the party which preferred to go to Hayti. 44 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY "All these parties were recognized and embraced by the Convention. Dr. Delaney was given a commission to go to Africa, in the Niger Val¬ ley, Whitfield to go to Central America and Holly to Hayti, to enter into negotiations with the authorities of these various countries for Negro emigrants and to report to future conventions. Holly was the first to execute his mission, going down to Hayti in 1855, when he en¬ tered into relations with the Minister of the Interior, the father of the late President Hyppolite, and by him was presented to Emperor Faustin I. The next Emigration Convention was held at Chatham, Canada West, in 1856, when the report on Hayti was made. Dr. De¬ laney went off on his mission to the Niger Valley, Africa, via England in 1858. There he concluded a treaty signed by himself and eight kings, offering inducements for Negro emigrants to their territories. Whitfield went to California, intending to go later from thence to Central America, but died in San Francisco before he could do so. Meanwhile [James] Redpath went to Hayti as a John Brownist after the Harper's Ferry raid, and reaped the first fruits of Holly's mission by being appointed Haytian Commissioner of Emigration in the United States by the Haytian Government, but with the express injunction that Rev. Holly should be called to cooperate with him. On Red- path's arrival in the United States, he tendered Rev. Holly a Commis¬ sion from the Haytian Government at $1,000 per annum and traveling expenses to engage emigrants to go to Hayti. The first shipload of emigrants were from Philadelphia in 1861. "Not more than one-third of the 2,000 emigrants to Hayti re¬ ceived through this movement, permanently abided there. They proved to be neither intellectually, industrially, nor financially prepared to undertake to wring from the soil the riches that it is ready to yield up to such as shall be thus prepared; nor are the government and in¬ fluential individuals sufficiently instructed in social, industrial and financial problems which now govern the world, to turn to profitable use willing workers among the laboring class. "The Civil War put a stop to the African Emigration project by Dr. Delaney taking the commission of Major from President Lincoln, and the Central American project died out with Whitfield, leaving the Haytian Emigration as the only remaining practical outcome of the Emigration Convention of 1854." THE EARLY CONVENTION MOVEMENT 45 The Civil "War destroyed many landmarks and the National Colored Convention, restricted to the free colored people of the North and the border States, was a thing of the past. Just after one of the darkest periods of that strife, when the dawn was apparent, there assembled' in the city of Syracuse, the last National Colored Convention in which the men who began the movement in 1830, their successors and their sons had the control. The sphere of influence even in that had some¬ what increased, for southeastern Virginia, Louisiana and Ten¬ nessee had some representation. Slavery was dead; the coloniza- tionists to Canada, the West Indies and Africa had abandoned the field of openly aiming to commit the policy of the race to what was considered expatriation. Reconstruction, even in 1864, was seen in the South peering above the horizon. The Equal Rights League came forth dis¬ placing the National Council of 1854, yet with the same object of the Legal Rights Association organized by Hezekiah Grice in Baltimore in 1830. John Mercer Langston stepped in the arena at the head of the new organization, but under more favorable auspices than was begun in the movement of 1830. A study of its rise, progress and decline belongs to another period of the evolution of the Free Negro. These four facts appear from a study of this movement: 1. The Convention Movement begun in 1830, demonstrates the ability of the Negro to construct a platform broad enough for a race to stand upon and to outline a policy alike far-sighted and statesmanlike, one that has not been surpassed in the eighty years that have elapsed. 2. The earnestness, the enthusiasm and the efficiency with which the work aimed at was done, the singleness of purpose, the public spirit and the intrepidity manifested, encouraged and inspired such men as Benjamin Lundy, "William Lloyd Garrison, Gerrit Smith, S. S. Jocelyn, Arthur and Lewis Tappan, William Goodell and Beriah Green to greater efforts and persistence in 46 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY behalf of the disfranchised American, accomplishing at last the tremendous work of revolutionizing the public sentiment of the country and making the institution of radical reforms possible. 3. The preparatory training which the convention work gave, fitted its leaders for the broader arena of abolitionism. And it can not be regarded as a mere coincidence that the only colored men who were among the organizers of the American Anti- Slavery Society in 1833, Robert Purvis and James G. Barbadoes, were both promoters and leaders in the Convention Movement. 4. The importance of industrial education in the growth and development of the Negro-American is no new doctrine in the creed of the representative colored people of the country. Be¬ fore Hampton and Tuskegee reared their walls—aye, before Booker T. Washington was born, Frederick Douglass and the Colored Convention of 1853 had commissioned Mrs. Stowe to ob¬ tain funds to establish an Agriculture and Industrial College. Long before Frederick Douglass had left Maryland by the Under Ground Railroad, but for the opposition of the white people of Connecticut, and within the echo of Yale College, would have stood the first institution dedicated to our enlightenment and social regeneration. Copies of this picture 17"x2'2" may be obtained by addressing Mrs. E. E. Cooper, owner of the copyright from whom permission is obtained, by inclosing $1.00 to her address, 1331 U St., N. YV. Washington, D. C. XII reconstruction fails From 1865 to 1870 the Equal Eights League had a respectable existence. The chief value of this body was that it brought to¬ gether colored men from different sections and created the com¬ mittee of colored men stationed in Washington during the winter immediately after the war, pending the fight between Congress and Andrew Johnson and the enactment of the Reconstruction Acts. This fight also paved the way for the framing and passage of the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This law and amendments were followed by the readmission of the States of Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. With the elective franchise safeguarded by the presence of the United States Army and the federal statutes there was a revolu¬ tion in the personnel and political administration of the South. In local and State offices colored men were chosen under the new constitutions. Negro magistrates and police officers in the towns and cities; members of the legislatures by the score; a half a dozen judges, secretaries of state in Florida, Mississippi, and South Carolina; and lieutenant governors in Louisiana, South Carolina and Mississippi. As Members of Congress, there were two Senators, Hiram R. Revels, who filled an unexpired term, and Blanche K. Bruce, the full term of six years from 1875 to 1881, both from Mississippi. Virginia had one colored Mem¬ ber of Congress, John M. Langston, who served one term; North Carolina, John A. Hyman, one term, James E. O'Hara, two terms; Henry P. Cheatham, two terms, and George H. White, 47 48 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY two terms. From South Carolina, Joseph H. Rainey who served in five Congresses, Rev. (later Bishop) Richard H. Cain, in two, Robert C. DeLarge, in one, Alonzo J. Ransier, in one, Thomas E. Miller, one term, Robert Brown Elliott, in two, George W. Murray, in two, Robert Smalls, in five. Georgia had Jefferson Long in part of a term. Florida sent Josiah T. Walls two terms. From Alabama came Jere Haralson, Benjamin S. Turner and James T. Rapier, one term each. Mississippi, John R. Lynch, two terms, and Louisiana, Charles E. Nash, one term. The withdrawal of the last contingent of United States sol¬ diers from the South during the Administration of President Hayes, and the opinion of the U. S. Supreme Court that the Enforcement Act was unconstitutional, as well as similar opin¬ ions as to other Reconstruction Legislation, were followed in 1877 by the collapse of the last reconstructed governments of Florida, South Carolina and Louisiana. Hope was indulged in, nevertheless, that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the National Constitution in the South would be recognized and enforced by local sentiment. . In Vir¬ ginia, the "readjuster" movement led by William Mahone triumphed in 1881 and gave a fair interpretation to the U. S. Constitution, and a combination between the Populists and the Republicans in North Carolina obtained control of the govern¬ ment of this State with a somewhat kindred result. In Ala¬ bama a union between the same elements gave promise of the same results. But all these successes were temporary. Begin¬ ning with Mississippi in 1890, South Carolina, Alabama, North Carolina, Virginia and Louisiana have revised their constitu¬ tions so ingeniously that while not violating the letter of the Fifteenth Amendment they have placed the power of admitting to the elective franchise entirely in the hands of local officers. These officers having full discretion have uniformly admitted all white men but disfranchised nearly all colored men, re- RECONSTRUCTION FAILS 49 gardless of whether they do or do not conform to the State law. Several attempts have been made to have the U. S. Su¬ preme Court rule on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of these revised constitutions. But thus far these attempts have been in vain. The elective franchise is now quite as much in control of the State as before the Civil War. One of the problems of the twentieth century is either the complete nullification of the war amendments or their enforcement in letter and spirit. XIII THE NEGRO AS A SOLDIER 1652-1781 As early as 1652 the Negro trained in the Virginia Militia and was found in the French and Indian "War. Crispus Attueks, the mulatto, was one of the first to fall March 5, 1770, in the Boston Massacre, in which the first blood of the Revolution was shed. From the very earliest days of the Revolution the free Negro enlisted as a soldier in common with other men. As such he was found in the service of nearly all the colonies.1 Their pres¬ ence created objection and led to a council of war, held October, 1775, composed of three major generals and six brigadiers, presided over by General George Washington, in which any further Negro enlistments were unanimously condemned. Ten days later this action was approved by a conference participated in by Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Harrison, "Washington, and the deputy governors of Connecticut and Rhode Island. The British took advantage of this policy of the Revolutionists, and Lord Dunmore, in a proclamation dated November 7, 1775, offered freedom and equal pay to all slaves who would join their army. Before the year closed, in fact on December 30, 1775, "Washington issued orders authorizing the enlistment of free Negroes as soldiers, and as such they continued until the close of the war. The connection of the Negro soldier in the Continental Army was not without incident. Some achieved honorable mention i Arnold's History State of It. I, p. 428. 50 Battle of Bunker Hill. THE NEGRO AS A SOLDIER 51 and distinction. Salem Poor was the subject of a memorial to the General Court of Massachusetts for his soldierly bearing and bravery. To Peter Salem belongs the distinction of killing Major Pitcairn at Bunker Hill, and Jordan Freeman killed Major Montgomery at the storming of Fort Griswold. At the battle of Rhode Island, August 29, 1778, a battalion of 400 Negroes withstood three separate charges from 1,500 Hessians under Count Donop. In his description of this battle Arnold says: "It was in repelling the furious onset, that the newly raised black regiment under Colonel Green, distinguished itself by deeds of desperate valor. Posted behind a thicket in the valley, three times they drove back the Hessians who charged repeatedly down the hill to dislodge them; and so determined were the enemy in these successive charges, that the day after the battle the Hessian Colonel who had led the attack, applied to exchange his command and go to New York, because he dared not lead his regiment again to battle lest his men should shoot him for having caused them so much loss." 1812-1814: In the War of 1812 the Negro was one-sixth of the naval forces of the young republic. Captain Oliver H. Perry, subse¬ quently Commodore, in the early part of the struggle com¬ plained because of the large number of Negro recruits sent him, but later he applauded them for their bravery and effi¬ ciency. A popular gathering was held in New York to honor Com¬ modore Decatur at which Hull, Jones and Decatur were present. Shortly after dinner was given, the crew, of which one-third was colored, mulattoes and full blacks, walked side by side with the white soldiers in the parade. Commodore Decatur re¬ viewed them. Some gentlemen seeing the Negro element ex¬ pressed their surprise to the Commodore and inquired if such men were good for anything in a fight. The Commodore re- 52 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY plied: "They are as brave men as .ever fired a gun. There are no stouter hearts in the service.''2 Incidents of the valor of the colored sailors in that struggle are abundant. John Johnson, struck by a twenty-four-pounder in the hip, which took away the lower part of his body, exclaimed while in this condition, "Fire away, my boys; no haul a color down." An¬ other, John Davis, just as seriously wounded, begged to be thrown overboard because he said he was in the way of others. In the east Senate stairway of the Capitol at Washington, and in the rotunda of the Capitol at Columbus, Ohio, Art has rescued from oblivion, by the celebrated picture of Perry's Victory on Lake Erie, the contribution of the Negro sailor to a place among the heroes of that engagement.3 General Andrew Jackson, President from 1829 to 1837, issued a stirring appeal for aid to the free colored people of Louisiana, September 21, 18.14. It runs as follows: '' Through a mistaken policy you have been deprived of a participation in the glorious struggle for National rights in which our country is engaged. This no longer shall exist." Two battalions were recruited and did splendid service in the battle of New Orleans. New York enrolled two battalions and Pennsylvania enrolled 2,400 soldiers. Still another was ready for service when peace was de¬ clared. So highly pleased was General Jackson with the service of the colored soldiers at the battle of New Orleans that he issued a proclamation containing these words: "To the men of color, soldiers! From the shores of Mobile, I called you 'to arms. I invited you to share in the perils and to divide the glory of your white countrymen. I expected much of you; for I was not uninformed of those qualities which must render you so formidable to an invading foe. I knew you could endure hunger and thirst and all the hardships of war. I knew that you <2 Am. Hist. Record, Vol. I, p. 115. s There were one hundred and nine dauntless colored heroes who fought on the Battle of Lake Erie.—Centennial Address of Rev. A. J. Carey. THE NEGRO AS A SOLDIER 53 loved the land of your nativity, and that, like ourselves, you had to defend all that is most dear to man. But you surpass my hopes. I found in you, united to those qualities, that noble enthusiasm that impels to great deeds. "Soldiers, the President of the United States shall be informed of your conduct on the present occasion, and the voice of the representative of the American Nation shall applaud your valor as your General now praises your ardor. The enemy is near. His sails cover the lake, but the brave are united, and if he finds us contending among ourselves, it will be for the prize of valor, and fame its noblest reward." In Louisiana a special act of the legislature authorized free Negro troops to be raised during the second war with England, but only those residing in the parish of Natchitoches, who pos¬ sessed real estate of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars, were eligible. This was the only instance of the enrolment of Negro troops in the half-century (1800-1850). Respecting this regiment, General Jackson wrote, in a letter to President Mon¬ roe describing the battle of New Orleans, "I saw General Packenham reel and pitch out of his saddle. I have always believed that he fell from the bullet of a freeman of color, who was a famous rifle shot, and came from the Attakapas region of Louisiana.,'4 Commenting on this belief Thorpe, the historian, says: "If war be man's most glorious occupation, and the death of the enemy's commander-in-chief be desirable, America should erect a monument to this forgotten free Negro who on a property qualification of a hundred and fifty dollars served so faithfully at the battle of New Orleans. Was not this almost as great a service as to command a Negro regiment?"5 4 Century Magazine, January, 1897. s Constitutional History of the American People, page 361. XIV the negro as a soldier 1861-1865 In the spring of 1862, the second year of the war which main¬ tained the supremacy of the Union and preserved the flag, Gen¬ eral David Hunter raised and equipped a regiment of Negroes in South Carolina. His action, which provoked censure and the offering of a resolution in the House of Representatives demanding the authority for this step, was ultimately approved by President Lincoln and by Congress. Negro soldiers thence¬ forth were recruited with enthusiasm until the total number was 178,975 in 138 regiments of infantry, six of cavalry, four¬ teen regiments of heavy artillery and one battery of light artil¬ lery. The record of the bravery of "The Colored Volunteer" in defense of- the flag has inspired alike the poet and the orator to some of the most eloquent tributes to the valor, the courage, the daring of the bronze boys in blue. The names of Milliken's Bend, Port Hudson and Port Pillow are as familiar as Bull Run, Antietam, Shiloh and Gettysburg. When the Second Louisiana Native Guards, one of the three colored battalions mustered in the Union cause at New Orleans, were leaving for service, Colonel Stafford, their commander, thus concludes an address, turning over the regimental colors: "Color-Guard: Protect, defend, die for, but do not surrender these colors.'' Plancianos, the gallant flag-sergeant, replied: "Colonel, I will bring back these colors to you in honor, or report to God the reason why." 54 THE NEGRO AS A SOLDIER 55 At Port Hudson, May, 1863, six times the battalion unsuccess¬ fully charged against the foe, Captain Cailloux, so black that he was proud of his color, leading on and refusing to leave the field, though wounded, until killed by a shell. The colors re¬ turned, but dyed with the blood of the brave Plancianos, who had reported to God from that bloody field. George H. Boker, the poet, immortalizes the engagement in "The Black Regi¬ ment." At Milliken's Bend, garrisoned by the Ninth and Eleventh Louisiana and the First Mississippi, Negroes, and about one hundred and sixty of the Twenty-third Iowa, white, about eleven hundred fighting men in all, defended themselves against a force of six Confederate regiments from 3 a.m. to 12 noon, when rescued by a Union gunboat. On July 18, 1863, the Fifty-fourth Massachusetts Regiment, under Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, in their charge against Fort Wagner, won undying fame. It was here that Flag-Sergeant William H. Carney, though wounded, bore the flag back in safety, though falling exhausted from the loss of blood, and exclaiming, "Boys, the Old Flag never touched the ground." In Virginia in the armies of the James and the Potomac, the prowess of the Negro soldier elicited praise from commanding officers as well as from an admiring world. Major C. A. Fleet¬ wood,1 with pardonable pride, says: "The true metal of the Negro as a soldier rang out its clearest notes amid the tremen¬ dous diapason that rolled back and forth between the embattled hosts!" It was September 29, 1864, at New Market Heights and Fort Harrison, that only one of a color guard of the 4th U. S. C. T., twelve men, came off the field on his own feet. This gallant flag-sergeant, Hilton, the last to fall, cried out as he went down, "Boys, save the colors," and they were saved. It was at New i Fleetwood was a medal of honor man; for other Colored Honor Men, see Appendix. 56 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY Market Heights that owing to the loss of their commissioned officers, six non-commissioned officers, Milton M. Holland, James H. Branson, Powhattan Beatty, Robert Pinn, Edward Ratcliff and Samuel Gilchrist, led their men so nobly, so bravely, so skillfully, that they were given special medals of honor. It was of this engagement that Gen. Benjamin F. Butler, a Represent¬ ative in Congress, thus spoke ten years after:2 " There in a space not wider than the clerk's desk, and three hundred yards long, lay the dead bodies of 543 of my colored comrades, slain in the defence of their country, who had lain down their lives to uphold its flag and its honor as a willing sacrifice. And as I rode along, guiding my horse this way and that lest he should profane with his hoofs what seemed to me the sacred dead, and as I looked at their bronzed faces, upturned in the shining sun, as if in mute appeal against the wrongs of the country for which they had given their lives, and whose flag had been to them a flag of stripes, in which no star of glory had ever shone for them. Feeling I had wronged them in the past, and believing what was the future duty of my country to them, I swore a solemn oath, 'May my right hand forget its cunning and my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I ever fail to defend the rights of the men who have given their blood for me and my country that day and for their race forever.' And, God helping me, I will keep that oath." 2 January 7, 1874. XV the spanish-american war The sinking of the battleship Maine in the harbor of Havana, Cuba, on the night of February 15, 1898, wrought the American people to such a pitch that war between the United States and Spain was inevitable. This was declared April 21, and a block¬ ade of the Cuban ports effected the next day. Cessation of hostilities was announced by a proclamation of President Mc- Kinley, August 12, 1898, and peace concluded by treaty ratified February 6, 1899. Cuba became a Republic, independent of Spain; Porto Rico was annexed to the United States and the Philippines became part of our insular possessions. In short, the United States, hitherto restricted in authority to the conti¬ nent of North America, became a world-wide power. In this struggle between the United States and Spain, com¬ pressed within an active period of less than four months, the Negro soldier won a distinction surpassing, if possible, that of his fame in the Revolution, the War of 1812 or that for the preservation of the Union. At the beginning of hostilities four regiments of colored sol¬ diers in the regular army establishment, the Twenty-fourth, and Twenty-fifth United States Infantry, and the Ninth and Tenth Cavalry comprised the entire representation of the Negro in the army; but during the brief progress of the war this quota was increased by one company, of the Sixth Massachusetts In¬ fantry, the Ninth Ohio Battalion,1 companies A and B of the i Major Chas. Young, a Negro graduate of West Point Academy. 57 58 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY First Indiana, the Eighth Illinois regiment, two battalions of the Twenty-third Kansas, the Third North Carolina regiment, the Second South Carolina, the Third Alabama and two bat¬ talions of the Sixth Virginia. To these must be added what are otherwise known as the immunes, for service in the Philippines, the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth U. S. Volunteers. The officers in the Eighth Illinois, the Twenty-third Kansas and the Ohio battalion, line and field, were colored; only the line officers in the other commands were colored men. No regiment South of Mason and Dixon's line was actually engaged on the fighting line in Cuba during the short conflict, but all the four colored regiments from the immunes of the colored volunteers saw service on the island of Cuba. There was nevertheless no hesitation in the response of the South to the call for troops; but before their troops were mustered in the service and could reach the front the real work had been accomplished. There were, however, white commis¬ sioned officers that had seen service on the Confederate side dur¬ ing the Civil War, who distinguished themselves in the Spanish American War. Among these were Generals Fitzhugh Lee of Virginia and Joseph Wheeler of Alabama. Sons of veterans of Federals and Confederates alike received lieutenancies and higher commissions, but no such honor was given the son of a Negro veteran. The Negro officer had once more to win his spurs and demonstrate his fitness for the honors grudgingly awarded him by State and Nation. President McKinley, it is reported, had declared his intention of promoting to a brig- adiership some Negro soldier before the end of the struggle, and the prospect seemed assured when there were brigaded regiments in Cuba; but on the eve of the retirement of its commanding officer, the officer next in line, being Major Charles Young, the brigade was suddenly disbanded by order of General Henry A. Corbin, who though he had commanded colored troops in the Civil War, is held responsible for the failure of the colored THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR 59 soldier to receive high commissions during the Spanish-American War. At the Battle of El Caney the capture of the stone fort was due to the gallantry of the Twenty-fifth Infantry; at San Juan the Ninth and Tenth Cavalry regiments distinguished them¬ selves, as did the Twenty-fourth Infantry. The surrender of the Spanish forces followed shortly afterwards and as indi¬ cated, the war speedily came to an end. Another correspondent thus expresses the situation : '' American valor never shone with greater luster than when the Twenty-fifth Infantry swept up the sizzling hill of El Caney to the rescue of the Rough Riders. Two other regiments came into view, but the bullets were flying like driving hail, the enemy were in trees and ambushes with smokeless powder, and the Rough Riders were biting the dust and were threatened with annihilation." * There are many thrilling incidents testifying to the bravery of the colored soldiers in this war. Stephen Bonsai, a news¬ paper correspondent, expresses what was well nigh the universal opinion. This is what he said: "It is a fact that the services of no four white regiments can be compared with those rendered by the four colored regiments—the Ninth and Tenth Cavalry, and the Twenty-fourth and Twenty-fifth Infantry. They were to the front at La Guasima, at Caney and at San Juan, and in what was the severest test of all that came later in the yellow fever hospitals. "L" Company is the oldest military organization among the colored people of this country. It dates back to 1782, when the Bucks of America was formed in Boston and was so far as authentic history points out, the first independent military company of America. This military company was made up of Negroes living in or near Boston, * Theodore Eoosevelt was with the Rough Eiders. In saving them, these black regiments saved for New York a governor and for the United States a president. 60 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY who had fought in the Revolutionary War. It was over 100 strong and under the command of one Colonel Middleton. It was presented with a set of colors by John Hancock, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and then Governor of Massachusetts. The flag is now in the custody of the Massachusetts Historical Society. In course of time this company applied to become a part of the Militia of Massa¬ chusetts, but was not only refused but they could not bear arms. In 1812 they again applied to the State to form an artillery regiment, but were refused. About 1837 they became the Boston Blues and shortly after the Massasoit Guards. A few years later they adopted the name of Liberty Guards and were upon certain occasions permitted by State authorities to bear arms. This name was held down to 1863, when this company became the nucleus of the Fifty-fourth Infantry Massa¬ chusetts Colored Volunteers. Those who remained at home were taken into the Massachusetts home guard, and were the first colored com¬ pany in the country to be recognized as a part of a State provisional armed force.—R. T. in New York Age. Also "Nell's Colored Patriots" and Livermore's "Researches." XVI the negro church The existence of the Negro church has been incidentally referred to. Such is its importance, however, that it deserves more de¬ tailed treatment. The original colored churches in different sections of the country came about in one of the following ways: 1. They were in some cases the result of special missionary effort on the part of the whites; 2. They were brought about by direct discrimination against the blacks made by the whites during divine worship; 3. They were the natural sequence, when on account of increase in numbers it became necessary for congregations to divide; whereupon the blacks were evolved as distinct churches, but still under the oversight, if not the exclu¬ sive control, of the whites; 4. They were, in not a few cases, the preference of colored com¬ municants themselves, in order to get as much as possible the equal privileges and advantages of government denied them under the existing system. The establishment of many of these churches took place at substantially about the same time, in sections more distant at that period than now, it was before the time of the railroad, the use of the steamboat or the telegraph; so it can easily be de¬ termined whether their coming into existence at the same time can be attributed to similar causes. The first regular Church organization was a Baptist Church, 61 62 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY at Williamsburg, Virginia, formed in the year 1776, and recog¬ nized as such in 1790.1 Following it were two Baptist Churches, one in 1788 in Savannah, and the other in 1790 in Augusta, Georgia.2 These three precede the Episcopal Church, St. Thomas in Philadelphia in 1791; Bethel Church, Philadelphia, in 1794; Zion Methodist Church, New York City, in 1796; Joy Street Baptist Church, Boston, in 1805; Abyssinian Baptist Church, New York, in 1803; First Baptist, St. Louis, 1830. So far as the establishment is concerned of the colored Methodist Churches which evolved the A. M. E. and A. M. E. Zion denomi¬ nations, persecution by the whites was the moving cause. They were compelled to protect themselves against the yoke sought to be imposed on them, by worshiping among themselves. The one movement in Philadelphia, the other in New York, moved in parallel—often in rival lines. New York and Philadelphia were soon in free States and their methods were those of freemen, in name at least, while the establishment of colored Methodist Churches in the South, as in Maryland under the direction of the whites, illustrated one of the instances of special missionary effort. The colored Baptist Churches in the South came mostly into existence mainly through the third cause indicated. The Presbyterian Church, as found among the colored people, is due to the operation of two causes; the desire of the colored people to be by themselves and that of the whites to strengthen their denomination among this class1. The first colored Episcopal Churches, both in New York and Philadelphia, resulted directly from causes similar to those which produced the colored Meth¬ odist Churches in these localities. A word as to the men mainly instrumental by reason of their position as pioneers in organizing these first churches in the different colored denominations, may not be out of place. The first colored pastor of which there is authoritative state- 1 Semple's Rise of the Virginia Baptists. 2 History of the Baptists, David Benedict. Infra W. J. White. THE NEGRO CHURCH 63 ment was Andrew Bryan, a convert to the preaching of George Liele by whom he was baptized. By Abraham Marshall, a noted pioneer Baptist (white), he was ordained in 1788 as the pastor of an African Baptist Church at Savannah, Georgia. Rev. W. J. White, D.D. of Augusta, Ga., the veteran editor of the Georgia Baptist in a letter dated September 6, 1893, writes as follows: 4'The Springfield Baptist Church in this city is the only individual church that has a hundred years of undisputed existence in Georgia among colored Baptists, and I think the only colored Baptist church in the country having at this time 103 years of undisputed and uninterrupted history. Rev. Jacob Walker who died in 1845 and had been pastor twenty- seven years was succeeded by Rev. Kelly Lowe who served six¬ teen years, till 1861, and Rev. Henry Watts succeeded Rev. Kelly Lowe, serving to 1877, sixteen years. These three men served together nearly sixty years and are all buried in the yard of the church. The pastorate prior to 1818 had been filled by Caesar McCradey who was also buried in the church¬ yard but the spot has been lost, and Ventor Golphin whose history is obscure. In 1888 we celebrated in Savannah the centennial of our denomination, which dates January 20, 1788, when the first church was organized. But in Savannah there are two churches claiming the paternity. One of these churches is the First African and the other is the First Bryan. While there may be dispute as to which of these churches is entitled to the honor of being the very church organized in 1788, there is no dispute with reference to the spot upon which the first church was organized and the date of the organization. My impression is that at even an earlier date than this a colored church was in existence upon some island not far distant from Savannah.''3 3 In the "Silver Bluff Church" by Rev. Walter H. Brooks this divine says "the Negro Baptist Church at Silver Bluff, S. C., was organized not earlier than 1773, not later than 1775." 64 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY The Pastor of the First Baptist Church of Portsmouth, Vir¬ ginia (white), known as the Court Street Baptist Church, was Reverend Josiah Bishop, a Negro. He succeeded Reverend Thomas Armstead (white), a commissioned officer of high rank in the Revolutionary War. "While Mr. Bishop's ability was not questioned, his pastorate for obvious reasons, was not of long duration. He went North and organized the Abyssinian Bap¬ tist Church in New York in 1803, the first colored Baptist Church in the free States. From this church the other colored Baptist Churches of the North and East sprang. Of the churches in the North, first was Richard Allen, one of the leaders in the Free African Society, from the members of which came the leaders, almost the organization itself, both of the Bethel Methodist and the St. Thomas Episcopal Churches in the city of Philadelphia. He was born February 12, 1760, a slave in Philadelphia. At an early age he gave evidence of a high order of talents for leadership. He was converted while quite a lad and licensed to preach in 1782. In 1797 he was ordained a deacon by Bishop Francis Asbury, who had been entrusted by John Wesley with the superintendence of the work in America. He possessed talents as an organizer of the high¬ est order. He was a born leader, an almost infallible judge of human nature and was actively identified with every forward movement among the colored people, irrespective of denomi¬ nation. Absalom Jones, next in historical importance, was born a slave at Sussex, Delaware, November 6, 1746. At the age of sixteen he was taken to Philadelphia. He was married in 1770, purchased his wife and afterwards succeeded in obtaining his own liberty. James Varick was born January 10, 1768, at Newburg, New York. He was licensed to preach in 1803 in New York, and was elected and consecrated the first Superintendent of the A. M. E. THE NEGRO CHURCH 65 Zion Church in June, 1821. He died after a brief administra¬ tion June 9, 1827. He was one of the colored men members of the Methodist Episcopal Church in New York who were per¬ mitted to hold meetings under their own auspices in 1796, and was one of the first elders elected when the first steps looking to a separate and independent organization of the colored mem¬ bership in New York was taken. Rev. John Gloucester, the first colored minister to act as pastor of a colored Presbyterian Church, possessed a fair English education which he received from private sources. He was a pioneer of Presbyterian ministers, as four of his sons, Jeremiah, John, Stephen and James, became Presbyterian ministers, and from the Sunday School of his church three other well-known ministers went forth, Rev. Amos to Africa, Rev. H. M. Wilson to New York and Rev. Jonathan C. Gibbs, who died in Florida, after having been Secretary of State and State Superintendent of Schools. Like Allen and Jones, Mr. Gloucester was born a slave, in Kentucky about the year 1776. Such was his intelli¬ gence that he was purchased by Rev. Gideon Blackburn, of the Presbyterian denomination also of Kentucky. The records show that when Mr. Gloucester was ordained Dr. Blackburn was the moderator of the presbytery, who on the appointment of Rev. Gloucester to the First African Presbyterian Church liberated him. He died May 2, 1822, after fifteen years of service in the church, during which time it rapidly increased in numbers from twenty-two to three hundred. With the increase of the colored population and its distribution to other centers, other religious societies sprang up, so that wherever you find any number of these people in the earlier decades of the Republic you will find a church, often churches, out of all proportion to the popula¬ tion. In the West, it may be stated, that colored churches were not the result of secessions or irregular, wholesale withdrawals 66 THE NEGRO IN AMERICAN HISTORY from the white churches as in the East. They sprang up di¬ rectly in the path of the westward migration of colored people from the South and the East. In the South, the whites were in complete and absolute con¬ trol, in church as in State. Colored people attended and held membership in the same church as the whites; though they did not possess the same rights or privileges. They either had special services at stated times or they sat in the galleries. When this colored membership increased to very large numbers separate churches for rather than of the colored people were established. In the South as in the North, this membership was principally in the Baptist and Methodist Churches, and to these denominations did these separate colored churches belong, with exceptions so rare that they may be named as to cities or dis¬ tricts where it was otherwise. Outside of the few ministers of the A. M. E. and the A. M. E. Zion Churches in the border States, it is doubtful if there were a score of colored pastors in full control of colored churches in the South before the Civil "War. There were a few other colored ministers not pastors of any historic churches yet who were so very conspicuous by their work as pioneers as to deserve special notice. There were Harry Hosier, who accompanied Bishop Asbury, frequently filling ap¬ pointments for him, Rev. Daniel Coker of Baltimore and Rev. Peter Spencer of Delaware who organized the (