Production Note Cornell University Library produced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox software and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and compressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the New York State Program for the Conservation and Preservation of Library Research Materials and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copyright by Cornell University Library 1993.CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGEca q □ □ s a □ ai ta ® ra ci sa e n uHISTORY OF THE WITH A HISTORY OF THE W\ AND CITY OF GENERAL, ANALYTICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL: By E. M. RUTTENBER. NEWBUBGH, N. Y.: E. M. RUTTENBER <& SON, PRINTERS. 1875. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, By E. M. RUTTENBER, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington, D. C.THE BEGINNING.” I—-----JLl_____J£i__miles^l5J^trtrobndorg. IN submitting to the public, some years ago, a History of New- burgh, the writer of this volume expressed the hope that his own or some more competent pen would revise it and extend it to a larger field. Since that time he has given no little attention to the examina- tion of records and to the collection of materials for a History of Orange County, with a view ultimately to combine his original work with it, and thus supply a volume which though in limited demand, would not the less be recognized as desirable. The result of his la- bors is, in part, herewith presented in a General History of Orange County and a revised History of Newburgh—the former embracing with as much fullness of detail as possible, the settlement and organi- zation of. the County, its Physiology, and its part in the history of the state and the nation. Appreciating the fact that Local History is, to a large extent, the material of History in its highest sense and scope; that to those who would thoroughly comprehend the Past, the former is more needful than the latter; that events of a National character are few in comparison with those which are Local; that the men who live in a Nation’s memory as the great statesmen of their day, are fewer still when compared with the many who at the same period filled other spheres, less prominent indeed, but still those wherein are shaped and fashioned, in our Nation at least, the events which are epitomized by the general historian,—the writer has endeavored to give in more extended form, in the History of Newburgh, the public enterprises in which the men of different periods have united; the re- ligious and educational establishments which they have reared; and to outline the more prominent actors who, from time to time, have directed public opinion and measurably, at least, advanced the social and political development not only of the community in which they lived, but of the County of which they have been representatives. Similar details of other towns are necessarily reserved for subsequent volumes, leaving the present one to be complete in itself or to serve as the first of a series as circumstances may warrant. It may not be improper to add that the general history and geography of the Coun- ty has never been so fully, and the writer believes so correctly, given as in the pages of this volume. This feature he Relieved to be due to the County, which from the earliest period has steadily occupied a po- sition of prominence in the councils of the State, giving to it its most distinguished rulers; from its representatives in the councils of the Nation, and in the army and the navy; and equally due to it from the celebrity of the products of its soil and the thrift of its people. If the work shall be accepted in the spirit in which it has been writ- ten, the writer will have his reward. E. M. RUTTENBER. Newburgh, N. Y.TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE ENOCH CARTER, OF NEWBURGH, N. Y., UNDER WHOSE ENCOURAGEMENT THE HISTORY OF NEWBURGH WAS FIRST PUBLISHED THIS VOLUME IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED.general ^isforg of grange ^omtlg. CHAPTER I. IN THE BEGINNING—ABORIGINAL ERA-THE WARS FOR POSSESSION. 1492 —1664. forest was hushed and its tenants mute, and as the hours passed on, the mountain sides again sparkled with gems and dew-drops as the morning sun awoke the scene to life. The spectators of that wonderful scene were not confined to civil- ized men and beasts of prey. The New World had a people, if not a civilization,—a people with laws and customs the most perfect type of democracy, into whose hands possession had been given by the Creator; a people dressed in costumes of feathers and furs, arm- ed with rude weapons, uttering a strange language, worshiping a strangle God. They were not strangers to Hudson in the sense that8 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. their existence was not known, for their name had reached Europe through the earlier voyagers; nor perhaps to many of them were those who now visited them in their own waters entirely unknown, for on their coast the Europeans had been seen; long years before, the adventurous Verazzano had surveyed a portion of their domin- ions; but never before had the then living generation stood face to face with people of the Old World. The young were filled with wonder, the old with awe. The signals of a change, they knew not what, floated before them. With this people Hudson’s experiences were varied. Wherever he cast anchor they visited his ship with presents, and manifested in many forms their desire to render acts of kindness. More hospita- ble men and women' never lived,—all that they had was at the ser- vice of their visitant. Constant was their intercourse,—increasing their gifts; but in many cases their kindness was mistaken, and their confidence abused. Below the Highlands, Hudson confined two of them, intending to take them to Holland; but when the opportunity came they escaped, and called from the shore to their captor in scorn. At the Katskills he met loving people and old men, from whom he received offerings and to whom he gave brandy. When in Newburgh bay (Sept. 30), he says “the people of the country came aboard us, and brought some small skins with them, which we bought for knives and trifles. At three o’clock the}7 departed.” On the 1st of October,ABORIGINAL ERA. 9 when achored off Stony Point, “the people of the mountains” visited him, “wondering at the ship and weapons.” They, too, sold skins for trifles. In the afternoon a canoe “kept hanging under the cabin windows,” and its occupant was detected pilfering. He had taken a “ pillow, and two shirts and two bandaliers,” when the “ mate shot him, and struck him in the breast and killed him.” His companions were much frightened, and fled away, some in their ca- noes, others jumping into the water. A boat was lowered to recover the stolen articles, when one who was in the water seized hold of it, “thinking to overthrow it,” but “the cook seized a sword and cut off' one of his hands, and he was drowned.” When Hudson reached the place where he had betrayed the young men, when going up the river, he was shot at with bows and arrows, to which he replied with six muskets “ killing two of them.” “ Yet they manned off’ another canoe with nine or tell men.” A falcon shot was sent through it and one of its occupants killed, while the sailors with their muskets “killed three or four more.” Prom this conflict he sailed for Europe, bearing with him not only his surveys, but an epitome of the future inter- course of the people of the Old ’World with those of the New. The conflict of the opposing civilizations had been joined. But the struggle was delayed. Meanwhile Hutch navigators divi- ded the river into reaches and gave names to them, as well as to the people with whom they traded, and planted their outposts of posses- sion. This crude geography and its nomenclature was gathered up by the Hutch historians and embodied in papers for the information of those desiring to embark in trade in the New World or to emigrate thither. In a paper written by DeLaet, who has been called the first historian of New York, it is said: “ Within the first reach, on the west bank of the river, where the land is low, dwell the Tapp ana. The sec- ond reach of the river extends upward to a narrow part named by our people Haverstroo,” at which place the natives were called Haverstroos. They were the chieftaincy some of the members of which sought to pilfer from the. cabin windows of Hudson’s ship on the afternoon of October 1st,—were the “ people of the mountains.” From Stony Point to the Hans-Kammer were the WaoranecJcs, “ the people of the country” who sold the “small skins” to Hudson on the 30th of September, and who were subsequently known as “ the Murderer’s Creek Indians.” Their castle was on the north spur of Schunemunk mountain, and their place of worship the Hans-Kammer. Above them were the WarranawonJcongs, subsequently known as “ the Esopus In- dians,” whose hunting grounds extended through the valley of the Wallkill. West of the Warranawon/congs, and occupying the country drained by the Helaware and its tributaries, were the Minsis or Min-10 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY nisinks. Those who are familiar with- the topography of the district. will require no more precise designation of (the territory occupied by these native tribes or clans than its water-sheds afford; but it may be added that the designation given is essentially confirmed by the deeds which the aboriginal lords executed for the lands which they sold; and it may also be stated in this connection, that the names by which these tribes were known were not those which they had given as belong- ing to themselves, but were those which they had given to the Dutch as the names of the streams on which they lived. The Warranawon- Icong was the Wallkill; * the Wauraneck, the Murderer’s Creek. Later, the tribal, and national organizations of this people appear- ed. It would be no violation of fact to say that their political con- stitution was similar to our own. They had villages or towns, counties or enlarged cantons, tribes or states, nations or united tribes. Each in its sphere was independent, yet the whole strongly and firmly bound together. The sub-tribes or villages south of Stony Point were Unulactos, or the Turkey tribe; those north, were Minds, or the Wolf tribe, with territorial jurisdiction extending through the Minnisink country of Pennsylvania and New Jersey; south of the Minds they were Unamis, or the Turtle tribe, j* The tribes named constituted the Lenni-Denape nation, which held its council-fire at what is now Philadelphia. Prom the Unamis was selected invariably, by the ruling chiefs of the other tribes, the King or Sagamore of the nation; a King both with and without power; a sovereign whose rule was perpetuated only through the love of his people; a monarch the most polished, the most liberal, the poorest of his race; one who ruled by permission, who received no salary, who was not permitted to own the cabin in which he lived or the land he cultivated, who could receive no presents that did not become the property of the nation, yet whose larder and treasure chest were never empty. To treat the history of the Lenapes at length would require several volumes. Briefly stated, they were the head of the Algonquin nations at the time of the discovery, but by a succession of wars with the Dutch, the English, and the Iroquois, were compelled, sometime about 1670, to yield to the latter and become a “nation of women”—i. e. a nation without power to make war or peace on their own account, or to sell or convey lands. In this condition they remained until 1755, (having, in the meantime, become generally known as the Delawares), when they threw off the yoke of subjugation, and, under alliances * No documentary evidence is claimed. The statement is on the authority of exam- Eles in multiplied instances. The word Esopus, by which the district was subsequently nown, is a corruption of Seepu, an Algonquin generic term for river, f Tribal organizations were known by the Totems or emblems which they painted upon their cabins, their persons, etc., as the Turkey, the Wolf, the Turtle.TBE WARS FOR POSSESSION. 11 with the Shawanocs, Mingoes, etc., were enabled to place themselves at the head of the western nations, and contest every inch of soil east of the Mississippi. But while these facts were being ascertained,—years before, many of them were known,—there came the hurrying to and fro of armed men, and the terribly echoing battle-cry of the woodland lords, “ Woach, Woach, Ha, Ha, Hack, Woach ! ” with which the settlers subsequently became familiar. The Dutch began their settlement at New Amster- dam (now New York) in 1626. A few years later, settlements were commenced at Paulus’ Hook (now Jersey City), then called Pavonia, and at Breucklen, now the city of Brooklyn, and a few small neigh- borhoods were scattered along the river north of Paulus’ Hook. These settlements brought with them frictions of opposing customs. In 1640, it is said, the Indians began to steal and destroy the cattle of the settlers; but the Indians claimed that the cattle of their neigh- bors, permitted to roam at large, destroyed their unfenced fields of corn, and that they killed them having no other remedy. Pending these complaints came an order from Director Kieft, demanding trib- ute of corn, furs, etc., “ from the Indians in the neighborhood of Fort Amsterdam.” The latter remonstrated, but Kieft insisted, and sent a sloop up to the Tappans to exact compliance, but without success. About this time from a plantation on Staten Island a number of pigs were taken by a company of Dutch sailors; but the Indians were credited with the wrong, and a number of them were killed. Their tribe retaliated, burned a plantation and killed four of its occupants. Kieft wished to declare a war of extermination, but was restrained by his Council, who preferred to wait until “ God and the opportuni- ty” should favor them in their wrongful slaughter. The opportunity was not long delayed. In the winter of 1643, a company of Mahicans* from Fort Orange, “ each with a musket on his shoulder,” came down to collect tribute from the WecJcquaesgecJcs of Westchester. The latter suffered terribly. Several were killed, and many men, women and children fled to Fort Amsterdam for safe- ty. At Pavonia large numbers of them collected, and also at Cor- leaPs Hook. Utterly defenceless as they were, Kieft determined to add to their misfortunes. On the night of the 25th of February, by his direction, his soldiers fell upon the homeless, trusting red men and killed eighty of them. “Neither age nor sex were spared. Warrior and squaw, sachem and child, mother and babe, were alike massacred. Daybreak scarcely ended the furious slaughter. Man- * The documentary proof is clear that this incursion was by the Mahicans, not the Mohawks, as stated by some historians. The lower eastern Hudson chieftaincies (the old Manhattans, etc.) were'conquered tribes and had probably neglected to pay the annual tribute due to the Mahicans,12 GENERAL msfORT OF ORANGE OOTlNTf. gled victims, seeking safety in the thickets, were driven into the river; and parents, rushing to save their children whom the soldiers had thrown into the stream, were driven back into the waters, and drowned before the eyes of their unrelenting murderers.” But this horrible scene had scarcely faded from the air, ere the hand of revenge was made red with the blood of the Dutch. Kieft, in his exultation, £ent out foraging expeditions to collect corn. One of these expeditions seized two wagon loads of maize from the Long Island Indians, who lost three of their, number in endeavoring to save their property. In retaliation the Long Island tribes made common cause with the Weckquaesgecks and other river cantons, who had now learned that the Dutch, and not the Mohicans, had been the principals in the massacre at Pavonia. Eleven chieftaincies rose in open war. The farmer was killed in the field, and women and chil- dren swept off into captivity. A temporary peace was secured in the spring, but in September came a renewal of hostilities, and the Dutch were driven from every foot-hold outside of Fort Amsterdam. The war-whoop of the Minsis rang along the Highlands, and through the wilds of Long Island and New Jersey, and was taken up by the out- lying clans of Mahicans, and at a single blow, from the Highlands of Neversink to the hills and valleys of the Tappans, the whole country was once more in the possession of its aboriginal proprietors. The Dutch colonists who escaped slaughter, fled to Fort Amsterdam, and terror kept watch with them for days. Sending to New England for succor, it came in the person of Capt. Underhill, a man more savage than the savages. His coming roused the courage of the Dutch and they sallied out and turned the tide of war. Large numbers of Indians on the east side of the Hudson were killed—at Stamford, Connecticut, from five to seven hundred were slaughtered. Again came temporary peace in the spring—the Indians desiring to plant; but war, with disaster to the Dutch, was renewed in the winter. Kieft now adopted a new course. He went to Fort Orange (now Albany) and secured the intercession of the Mohawks and Mahi- cans, with whom the Dutch there were in alliance, and on the 30th of August, 1645, through their influence, a treaty of peace was concluded. The chiefs of the Hackinsacks and Tappans, delegates from the Long Island tribes, and a Mahican chief who spoke for his own people on the eastern bank of the river, met the Dutch, and the Mohawks acted as arbitrators. The terms were arranged and peace restored. Ten years of quiet were now enjoyed by the settlers, but during that period the Indians suffered many wrongs which they brooded over and burned to avenge. The excuse for a fresh appeal to arms occurred in the autumn of 1655, A squaw, detected in stealingTHE WARS Eon POSSESSION. 13 peaches from the garden of Van Dyck, at New Amsterdam, had been killed by him, and her tribe, the Weckquaesgecks, determined to avenge her death. To make their determination more effectual, they appealed to a war party of their friends, then on an expedition, to aid them. Learning that Director Stnyvesant, who, in the meantime had succeeded Kief’t, was absent on a visit to South River, some eight hundred armed men suddenly appeared before Fort Amsterdam in sixty-four canoes. Landing before the break of day, they scattered through the streets and, under the pretence of looking for their ene- mies, broke open several houses. The Council and the leading inhab- itants immediately assembled at the Fort, called the chiefs before them and exacted a promise that they would leave the towij at sun- set, but before the hour came they found Van Dyck and left him dead, as they supposed. This act aroused the town, and the burger guard rallying out from the Fort attacked the Indians as they were embark- ing in their canoes. This appeal to force was regarded by them as a declaration of war, and they resolved to strike while they had the opportunity. Passing over to the Jersey shore, they laid waste Hoboken and Pavenia, and killed or captured most of the inhabitants. In three days “one hundred of the settlers were killed, one hundred and fifty made prisoners, and three hundred more ruined in estate.” Again the settlers fled to Fort Amsterdam as to a city of refuge. Director Stuyvesant was sent for, and shortly after arrived with his soldiers. Meanwhile the Indians had retreated with their captives— a portion to New Jersey and the remainder to the Highlands. The Hackinsacks soon after offered their prisoners for ransom, and nego- tiations being opened peace was concluded with them. The scene was now changed to the Esopus country, with the Warra- nawonkongx as principals. Hitherto difficulties had been confined to the vicinity of Fort Amsterdam, for the very obvious reason that the Dutch had not extended their settlements north of Hackinsack. In the district between Fort Orange and Fort Amsterdam, the Indians had been mainly visited by traders in sloops, although it is said that on Kingston point a Dutch trading post was established as early as 1611. Occupation of the Esopus country by permanent settlers, however, was first begun in 1652, when Thomas Chambers and some of his neighbors removed thither from Rensselaerwyck. With these settlers the Indians soon came in. collision, and during the war of 1655, the former abandoned their plantations. In 1656, they returned and continued for some time unmolested, but, as in other places, they soon devoted the largest portion of their time and means to the pur- poses of trade, and, with a view to secure'the largest amount of furs, imprudently made free with the sale of brandy and other liquors,14 CFNFRAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. under the influence of which the Indians became troublesome and re- sorted to violence. “ One of the settlers was killed, the house and outbuildings of another were burned, and the settlers were forced, by threats of arson and murder, to plow up the patches where the sava- ges planted their maize.” The settlers wrote to Stuyvesant, who re- sponded by immediately visiting the scene of disturbance with fifty of his soldiers, and, the day following his arrival (May 31, 1657), called the people together for council, The result of this conference was the establishment of a stockade village for defensive purposes, and an interview with the Indians. The latter was held in an open field. The chiefs denied that the murder which had been committed was by one of their number, but “ by a Minnisink ” who was then “ skulking among the Haverstraws,” and charged that the whole of the disturbance arose from the “drink” which had been sold them by the Dutch. They also recounted the losses which had been inflicted upon them in Director Kieft/s time (1645). Stuyvesant replied that the acts of his predecessor in the massacre of Pavonia, had been settled in the subsequent treaties, and if they had not, that he was not responsible for them; that no violence had been committed by the Dutch since he came to the Province; that the Indians had not consulted him in the treatment of Van Dyck, and altogether made out quiet a case against them, concluding therefrom that the latter should sell to him the whole of the Esopus land, “ and remove further into the interior.” The Indians asked time to consider the matter, and on the 4th of June returned with their answer. They would give the Director the land he asked “to grease his feet, as he had taken so long and painful a journey to visit them.” * The stockade was soon completed, and the Director returned to Fort Amsterdam. The Indians, however, were far from being satisfied with the new order of things, and in common with other tribes, were ready, on even slight provocation, to commence war. Unfortunately it was no slight cause which led them to take up the hatchet in 1659. Thomas Chambers, of whom we have already spoken, in September of that year, employed several of them to husk corn, “and at the end of their day’s work gave them some brandy for which they asked.” A carouse followed, in the midst of which a party of settlers issued from the village and assailed the unsuspecting red men, killed two of their number, and wounded the third who escaped. This dast- ardly act provoked a terrible retaliation. War was again declared; “houses, barns, and harvests were burned up; cattle and horses were * The land conveyed was called Atkarkarton, or the Great Plot. It has been assumed that an Indian village was located there from the fact that the Dutch called their settle- ment “ Wiltwyck,” or Indian village. We conclude, however, that the Indian village was that known as “ Wiltmeet,” about two miles west from Atkarkarton.THE WARS FOR POSSESSION. 15 killed.7’ Four or five hundred savages invested'the stockaded village, and after vainly attempting to set fire to it, avenged themselves by burning at the stake eight or ten prisoners whom they had taken. A courier was immediately sent to Fort Amsterdam for assistance, and another to Fort Orange asking the intercession of the Mohawks and Mahicans. Stuyvesant hurried to the scene with about one hundred men, and the Mohawks and Mahicans sent down five of their number to act as intercessors. The latter visited the Warranawonkong chiefs, procured the release of two prisoners, and persuaded the sachems to a truce,—an agreement to peace they could not obtain. The war was renewed in the spring of 1660. Ensign Smith made frequent incursions into the interior, and, on the 18th March, reduced the palisaded village of Wiltmeet,* and took twelve prisoners. Subse- quently the place was again visited, an encampment which had been formed there broken up, and Preummaker, “the oldest-and best” of the Esopus chiefs, killed. The Indians petitioned for peace in June, and Stuyvesant went up to Esopus to meet them. He arrived on the 11th of July and found delegates from the Mohawks, Wappingers, and other tribes to assist in the negotiations; but the Warranawonkongs were not represented. Messengers were sent to the interior to induce their attendance, and on the 15th, four sachems arrived, a grand council of all the inhabitants was held, and terms of peace arranged. In compensation for damages, the Indians conveyed “all the lands of Esopus” to the Dutch, and the latter paid ransoms in corn for the captives in the hands of the Indians. But the captive Indians from Wiltmeet were not restored; by Stuyvesant’s order they had been sent to Curacoa as slaves. Scarcely had the Warranawonkongs agreed to this treaty before new causes of grievance were found. They held that the Dutch had com- menced their New Village on land which had not been given to them; that the New Fort, as they called the Ronduit,f boded them no good; that if their white neighbors were sincere in their professions of friend- ship, they would restore to them their enslaved kindred. To quiet them, Stuyvesant promised to visit them and bring them the presents demanded by their customs, but this promise he failed to keep. He renewed this promise in June (1663); but without faith in him and, regarding the offer as only a delay for a more favorable opportunity to make war upon them, they attacked the settlement on the 1th. On the morning of that day, the settlers went forth to their fields as usual*. About noon, bands of Indians entered the gates of both villa- * Situated some distance above the second fall (or creek) flowing into Kit Davit’s Kill (now called the Esopus creek), “ about nine miles from the Hudson.”—-Brodhead. t This Ronduit or Redoubt was on the bluff of land called Ponckockie, and is perpet- uated in the name of Rondout.16 GENERAL BISTORT OF ORANGE COUNTY. ges, and scattered themselves among the houses, ostensibly for the purposes of trade Suddenly they attacked the New Village and de- stroyed it at a blow. “ Some people on horseback escaped” and reached the Old Village, but their arrival was the signal of attack upon the latter, for scarce had the alarm been given when the Indians uttered their war-whoop and commenced the work of death. “ The people were murdered in their houses with axes and tomahawks, and by firing on them with guns and pistols.” Women and children were seized and carried off prisoners; houses were plundered, and men, rushing to the defence of their families, were shot down by foes con- cealed in their own dwellings. To aid in the wTork of destruction, the Indians set fire to the village on the windward side. The flames spread rapidly, but when at their height, the wind suddenly changed to the west and prevented further devastation. The panic occasioned by the sudden attack having subsided, the settlers rallied and drove the Indians out. By evening all was still again and the bereaved in- habitants kept mournful watch during the night. Twenty-one lives were lost, nine were wounded, and forty-five carried off captive; the New Village was annihilated, and at the Old Village twelve houses were burned.* Immediately on the receipt of the intelligence of this disaster, Stuyvesant dispatched Col. Martin Kregier with a company of sol- diers to assist the settlers. Kreiger arrived at the Ronduit on the 4th of July. In a few days five Mohawk and Mahic.an chiefs arrived from Fort Orange, and by their mediation some of the Butch cap- tives were released; but the Warranawonkongs would not listen to propositions for peace unless the Butch would pay “for the land named the Great Plot,” and reward them with presents within ten days. The Butch commander replied by sending out scouting par- ties, who succeeded in bringing in a few prisoners from whom it was learned that the Indians had retreated to their castle; and thither it was determined to follow them. The expedition reached its destinar tion on the evening of the 26th of July. The castlef was a formida- ble structure. It was “ defended by three rows of .palisades, and the houses in the fort encircled by thick cleft palisades with port holes in them, and covered with bark of trees;” in form it was quadrangular, but the angles were “ constructed between the first and second rows of palisades ”—the third row of palisades standing “full eight feet * The New Village was about three miles from the Old Village and the Ronduit about the same distance. Both villages are territorially included in the bounds of the present city of Kingston. t The location of this fort, or palisaded village, is defined in the boundary lines of lands conveyed by the treaty of 1665: “Lying and being to the west and south-west of a certain creek or river called by the name of Kahanksen, and so up to the head thereof where the Old Fort was.”THE WARS FOR POSSESSION. 17 off from the others towards the interior,” the whole being “ on the brow of the hill” surrounded by table land. But the object of the expedition was not accomplished. Warned of the approach of their enemy, the Indians retreated to the Shawangunk mountains and took their captives with them. From a captured squaw it was learned that the Indians were some four miles distant, and a force was sent thither; but when they arrived at the designated place, it was found that they had again retreated. Kregier, however, destroyed the Kahanksen castle by fire, cut down the corn-fields which the In- dians had planted, and destroyed “ about a hundred pits full of corn and beans,” which had been preserved from the crop of the previous year. This work accomplished, he returned to Wiltwyck.* The settlers now engaged in harvesting their grain, and the sol- diers guarded them while at work. Offensive operations were not re- sumed until September, when a force of fifty men was sent out to reduce a new castle which the Indians were said to be erecting, situ- ated “ about four hours further than their first fort,” which had been burned. The expedition reached its destination on the 5th of Sep- tember. The Indians were taken by surprise, but made a stout re- sistance. They were busy completing their fort, and had left their arms at their houses “ about a stone’s throw from the fort.” Alarmed by a squaw, who had discovered the approach of the Dutch, they rushed to secure their arms, but were only partially successful so closely were they pursued. Retreating across the kill, they threw back the Dutch fire with such spirit that it was found necessary to send a strong party to dislodge them. “ In this attack the Indians lost their chief Papequanaehan, fourteen warriors, four women and three children.” On the part of the Dutch three were killed and wounded. Thirteen Indians were taken prisoners, and twenty-three Dutch captives released. The Dutch found plunder sufficient to “ well fill a sloop,” but were obliged to leave it. Everything was de- stroyed that could be. “ The fort was a perfect square with one row of palisades set all around, being about fifteen feet above and three feet below ground,” but it was not completed. Two angles of “ stout palisades, all of them about as thick as a man’s body, having two rows of port-holes, one above the other,” were done, and, when surprised, the Indians “ were busy at the other angle.” The victori- ous expedition returned to the settlement laden with spoil, and the Indians fled to the mountains to brood over their defeat and loss. On the 1st of October, another expedition was sent out on the same route and arrived at the fort last destroyed on the 2d. The In- * By a formal charter of date May 16, 1661, the settlement was ordered to be called “ Wiltwyck,” or Indian Village, The English changed the name to Kingston.18 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. dians had meanwhile returned to it and thrown the bodies of their dead comrades into five pits, from which “the wolves had rooted up and devoured some of them. Lower down on the kill four other pits were found containing bodies; and further on, three Indians with a squaw and child lay unburied and almost wholly devoured by wolves.” A terrible picture of desolation was spread out on either hand, where, but a few days before, the native lord had exulted in his strength, but who now, crushed and broken, had retreated southward among their kindred Minsin. The Dutch forces completed the destruction of the fort; the palisades were pulled down, the wigwams burned, and all the corn cut up and cast into the kill. The WarranawonJcongs, upon whom this chastisement had principal- ly fallen, solicited peace in the fall, and an armistice was granted. They had suffered severely; their villages, from Wawayanda to Eso- pus were not without mourners; their store-houses were rifled, and their crops destroyed. Nor were their allies, the Waoranecks, more fortunate. Although their territory had not been invaded, nor their villages burned, they were not the less subdued; the embers of their forest worship, which had for ages been lighted on the Dans-Kamnier, were extinguished forever. In the spring following, SewdcTcenamo, in conference at Fort Amsterdam, lifted up his voice in prayer to his God —Bachtamo —that “ something good ” might be concluded with the Dutch, and there executed a treaty by the terms of which all that had passed was to be forgiven and forgotten; the lands claimed by the Dutch, and now conquered by the sword, were to remain the property of the conquerors, and the vanquished were not to approach the Dutch settlements with arms. This treaty was ratified (May 16, 1664,) amid the roar of cannon, and was celebrated by a public thanksgiving. With its conclusion was also closed the struggle of the aboriginal clans for the possession of their ancient seats on the western slope of the valley of the Hudson. Their retreating foot- steps were yet to be marked on advancing frontiers by blazing torch and branding tomahawk; but from the blue hills of Katskill to the southern verge of the Highlands they only awaited the granting of title deeds to their successors. The fertile fields of those who, a half century before, had gazed in awe upon the sleeping navigator's ship beside the “ northernmost of the mountains,” were prepared for the sturdy immigrants from Europe. iHiminnifiiimMHimimiiiimmiintLAND T1TLES—FLRST SETTLEMENTS. 19 CHAPTER II. ABORIGINAL DEEDS-LAND PATENTS—FIRST SETTLEMENTS. 1664—1109. THE English succeeded the Dutch in the government of New Neth- erland on the 6th of September, 1664. The latter had performed the task assigned to them; had introduced the religion, the jurispru- dence, the customs of the Fatherland; had prepared the way for the mingling of creeds and races, and the development of the principles of civil-liberty. A stronger hand was now to take the direction; a common flag to float from the rugged cliffs of the north to the savan- nas of the south; a fresh impulse to be given to immigration. The title of the province was changed; New Amsterdam became New York; Fort Orange was christened Albany; changes were made in the administration of the government; treaties were renewed with the Indians. When this work was accomplished, Governor Nicolls wrote: “The lands which I intend shall be first planted, are those upon the west side of Hudson’s river, at or adjoining to the Sopes;” and having, in his treaty with the Warranawonkongs, secured a clear definition of the bounds of the tract which the Dutch had previously “ conquered by the sword,” he added: “ The Governor hath purchased all the Sopes land, which is now ready for planters to put the plow into, it being clear ground.” The declaration was not a literal fact; the tract which the Indians had been compelled to yield embraced scarce three townships; but practically there was no substantial im- pediment to the occupation of the territory designated. While this preparation was going forward, in the Old World relig- ious intolerance was scattering its victims broadcast. France sent forth her thrifty Huguenots; Scotland, her implacable Presbyterians; the Palatinate, her impoverished husbandmen. On the banks of the Hudson fragments rent from these nationalities met, and carved out, in the forest depths, new homes. The “ Christian patented lands of Haverstraw,” as they are termed in the recprds, were the first to re- ceive immigrants under the new regime. Balthazer de Hart and his brother Jacob, among the earlier immigrants from Holland, had loca- ted in New Amsterdam, and there subscribed their names to the oath of allegiance to the Duke of York. The former, engaged in trade, 0220 GENERAL BISTORT OF ORANGE COUNTY. had secured a comfortable subsistence, his house being rated at two thousand florins. Prior to July 31, 1666, he had purchased from the Indians, “ all that tract of land lying on the west side of Hudson’s river called Haverstraw, being on the north side of the hills called Verdrietig hook, on the south side of the Highlands, on the east side of the mountains so that the same is bounded by Hudson’s river and round about by the high mountains.” Presuming that the tract was included in the boundaries of New Jersey, he obtained from Car- teret and the council of that province, a patent,* and transferred his interest to Nicholas Depuy and Peter Jacobs Marius. On subsequent purchase and patent he acquired (April 10, .1611,) the “ parcels of land called by the Indian names of Newasink, YandaJcah, Caquaney and Aquamak, bounded on the west by a creek called Menimkcungue, on the east and north by Hudson’s river, and on the south by the mountains,” which became the property of his brother, Jacob; and also a tract “ known by the name of Ahequerenoy,” which, with a portion of the previous purchase, came to the possession of Hendrick Eyker,—the whole becoming the basis of the boundaries of all sub- sequent grants in the district. The second settlement was on the extreme north of the district the history of which we are considering. Louis DuBois, a Huguenot pioneer, driven thither by the pending persecutions of the people of his faith in France, located, with some of his friends, at Esopus in 1660. Contributing the captivity of his wife and children to the In- dian war of 1663, he subsequently induced several families of his countrymen, who were more recent immigrants, to unite with him in establishing a French town. Twelve men, known as the “ Twelve Patentees,” wore selected to obtain title to lands, who, after an ex- amination of the country, purchased from the Indian proprietors (May 26, 1677,) a tract of 36,000 acres, lying immediately south of the “ Kedoute creek,” as the Warranawonkong came to be called. On the 29th of September, following, a patent was obtained from Governor Andros, in the name of “ Louis du Bois and his partners, that is, Christian Doyau, Abraham Hasbroucq, Andre le Febvre, Jean Hasbroucq, Pierre Doyau, Louis Beviere, Anthoine Crespel, Abraham du Bois, Hugue Frere, Isaac du Bois, and Simon le Febvre, a their heirs and others,”—men whose names live in the annals of their adopted country. On this patent nine families immediately settled, and laid, in the faith which they professed, the foundations of New Paltz. The third settlement was about midway between those already de- scribed. Patrick MacGregorie; his brother-in-law, David Toshuck, * The grant was subsequently confirmed by the Governor and Council of New York.— The patent is of record in New Jersey.LAND TITLES—FIRST SETTLEMENTS. 21 who subscribed his name “Laird of Minivard," and twenty-five others, principally Scotch Presbyterians, entered upon lands at the mouth of the Waoraneck. It was their original intention to settle in New Jersey, but they were persuaded by Governor Dongan to take up lands in New York. Obtaining a license for that purpose, Mac- Gregorie, acting as their representative, purchased for his people a tract of four thousand acres, embracing lands on both sides of Mur- derer's creek, “ and so settled themselves, their families and sundry of their servants on the land so purchased, and were not only the first Christians fhat settled and improved thereon, but also peaceably and quietly possessed and enjoyed themselves during the term of their natural lives." On what is now known as Plum Point, but which was then called, from its aboriginal owner, Couwanhamh Hill, Mac- Gregorie reared his cabin, and in the same vicinity were the cabins of his associates, William Chambers, William Sutherland, and one Col- lum, while on the south side of the creek the “ Laird of Minivard," and his servant, Daniel Maskrig, established a trading post. Unfortunately, MacGregorie did not perfect his title by patent. Trusting to Governor Dongan to protect his interests, he entered the service of the state, while Dongan obtained by purchase on his own account (Oct. 25, 1684), from “Mangenaett, Taenia, Keghgekapowell alias Joghem, three Indians native proprietors and principal owners, with the consent of Pemeranaghin, chief sachem of Esopus Indians," a tract described as extending from “ the Paltz along Hudson's river to the land belonging to the Indians at the Murderer's kill, thence westward to the foot of the high hills called Pitkiskaker and Alaska- wasting, thence southwesterly all along the said hills and the river called Peakadasank to a water pond lying upon said hills called Meretange, comprehending all those lands, meadows and woods called Nescotank, Chawangon, Memorasink, Kakoghgetawnarnnch, and Ghitta- tawaghP . The consideration was the sum of ninety pounds and eleven shillings, in the following goods: “10 fathoms blue duffels, 10 fathoms of red duffels, 200 fathoms white wampum, 10 fathoms stroud water (red cloth), 10 fathoms blue cloth, 10 blankets, 10 guns, 10 kettles, 10 duffel coats, 10 drawing knives, 10 shirts, 10 tobacco boxes, 10 children's duffel coats, 10 children's shirts, 10 pairs of hose, 50 lbs. powder, 50 bars lead, 10 pair shoes, 10 cutlasses, 10 hatchets, 10 hoes, 10 scissors, 10 tobacco tongues, 100 flints, 2 rolls tobacco, 20 gals, rum, 2 vats strong beer, and 1 barrel cider." To this purchase he added (April 16, 1684), by deed from Were- kepes, sachem, Sackaghemeck, Sewiskkamock alias Hans, Apiskaeuw, Gashoros, Gsquameck, Movingamaghan, Poghghock, and Kaghtsikoos, the lands owned by “ themselves and copartners," being a tract begin-22 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. ning “ at about a place called the Dancing Chamber, thence south to the north side of the land called Haverstraw, thence north-west along the hill called Skoonnenoghky to the bounds of his purchase from the Esopus Indians aforesaid, including the Murderer’s creek.” The con- sideration was: 150 fathoms of wampum, 120 royals, 20 fathoms duf- fels, 6 guns, 7 brass kettles, 8 blankets, 6 fathoms strouds, 2 cloth coats, 2 broad axes, 5 pair shoes, 6 children’s shirts, 20 knives, 50 lbs. powder, 80 bars lead, 25 lbs. shot, 2 rolls tobacco, 4 iron pots, 10 to- bacco tongues, 10 tobacco boxes, 4 lbs. bood, 2 half vats single beer, 2 half vats double beer, 5 glass bottles, 5 earthen jugs, 2 pew- ter dishes, 2 bottles with rum, 100 tobacco pipes, 10 hatchets, 6 draw- ing knives, 4 addz, 10 hoes, 10 pair stockings, 8 shirts, 6 pistols, 10 children’s blankets, 2 boys’ cloth coats, 6 boys’ duffel coats, 20 gallons rum, £2 * paid Frederick Phillipse, £2 paid Stephanus Van Cortlandt. Not only had the Indians previously sold to MacGregorie a portion of the lands which by this sale they conveyed to Dongan, but Step- hanus Van Cortlandt held their deed for a tract opposite Anthony’s Nose. The purchase was made July 18, 1083, and the tract describ- ed as “beginning on the south side of a creek called Sankapogh, and so along said creek to the head thereof, and then northerly along the high hills as the river runneth, to another creek called Assinapink, and thence along the said creek to Hudson’s river again, together with a certain island and parcel of meadow land, near or adjoining the same, called Manahawaghkin, and by the Christians, Salisbury island.” Sackaghemeck, sachem of Haverstraw, Werekepes, and Kaghtsikoos, were the grantors. Luckily, he preserved his deed, and under it succeeded in obtaining a patent attaching his purchase to his manor, on the opposite side of the river. But the MacGregorie colonists were not so fortunate. Governor Dongan conveyed his two purchases to Captain John Evans, by pat- ent, Sept. 12, 1694, under the title of the Lordship and Manor of Fletcherdon.. MacGregorie, after serving the province in the capaci- ty of Muster-General of the militia and as its agent among the north- western Indians in a district of country which had not been previously visited, had yielded up his life in the Leisler revolution of 1691; and a peaceful death had closed the earthly cares of David Toshuck in the bosom of his family at Plum Point. To dispossess the heirs was the first work of Evans, to whose shame it is written that he compelled MacGregorie’s widow, Margaret, to sell to him the house in which she lived for “ £30 or £35, to the ruin of herself and family.” To her and to her surviving neighbors he then granted leases, thus pre- serving title and possession as well as the continuity of the settle- * The pounds of this period were of about the value of an United States dollar.LAND TITLES—NIBST SETTLEMENTS. 23 ment. The Scotch settlers who remained in possession under these leases obtained no subsequent patent titles, except in the case of the heirs of MacGregorie, to whom, some years later, a patent was grant- ed for-the Plum Point farm, and also for a mountain tract, in conside- ration of their claim. The fourth settlement, and by far the most considerable, was made adjoining the “ Christian patented lands of Haverstraw.” It was com- posed of immigrants from Holland, principally members of the Re- formed Dutch Church. Among them were descendants or relatives of David Pieterson de Vries, who had occupied a conspicuous position in the earlier history of the province, and had established a plantation which he called Vriesendael, situated “in a beautiful valley just be- low the mountains.” Driven thence during the war of 1645, he had taken to Holland a memory which had been treasured by his family and neighbors, who, on their arrival, selected a location in the vicinity of if not embracing the site of his ancient “little bouwerie.” Ob- taining, through trustees selected for that purpose, a title from “ the native Indian proprietors,” and being in numbers sufficient to demand it, they were granted (March 20, 1686,) a township patent, “under the name of the Town of Orange,” with all the powers “practiced or belonging unto any town within this Government.” The trustees of the grant were: Cornelis Claessen Cuyper, Daniel de Klercke, Peter Harnich, Cattis Harnich, Gerritt Steumetts, John de Vries, Sr., John de Vries, Jr., Claes Mannde, Jan Stratemaker, Staaes de Groot, Arean Lammeates, Lamont Arianuis, Huybert Gerryts, Johannes Gerrits, Eide Van Vorst, and Cornelius Lammerts. The boundaries of the tract were defined as “beginning at the mouth of Tappan creek where it falls into the meadow and running from thence along the north side of the said creek to a creeple bush and falls into Hack- insack river, northerly to a place called ‘ the Greenbush and from thence along said Greenbush easterly to the lands of Class Janse and Dowe Harmanse,* and from thence southerly along said land upon the top of the hills to the aforementioned mouth of Tappan creek where it falls into the meadow aforesaid.” The center of the township was at Tappan, where a Glebe for the support of a minister was laid out and a church organized.f A vacant tract of land, immediately west of Haverstraw, was conveyed by deed and patent (the latter, June 25, 1696,) to Daniel Honan and Michael Hawdon. This tract, which is described as being * Probably Harman Dowson who had taken np a tract called Pessatinck, on Hackin- sack river. f The Reformed Protestant Dutch. It was organized Oct. 24,1694. The first preacher was the Rev. Guilliam Bartholf. The first church edifice was erected in 1716. The Glebe consisted of 55 acres.24 ' GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. known by the name of Kuck-quack-ta-wake (Kakiate), was “ bounded on the east by the Christian patented lands of Haverstraw, on the north by a creek called Shamorack or Peasqua, which runs under a great hill, from which it continues a west course until the west-south-west side of a barren plain called Wishpegwrap bears south, thence to the west- south-west side of aforesaid plain, from thence south-south-west until the said line comes to a creek that runs to David Demaree’s creek to the south side of the land called Marranehaw, and thence down the said creek to the Christian patented lands.” Adjoining this tract on the south, Samuel Bayard was granted certain tracts called Whori- mms, Per seek, Gemackie and Narrashunck, “ bounded north by the land of Daniel Honan and Michael Hawdon, south by the parting line of this Province and the Jerseys, west by Saddle river, and east by Demarree’s creek,” containing two thousand acres. The Indian deed for this and several other purchases, was covered by one to Lucas Tienhoveu, embracing by survey one hundred thousand acres, but for which no patent was issued. Between the township of Orange and the Haverstraw lands the rocky bluff known as Verdrietig hook, by the Indians called Quas- peeck, including Dockland lake, became the subject of controversy be- tween “John Hutchins and Company,” and “Jarvis Marshall and Company.” Both parties obtained deeds, but the latter apparently had priority in date of purchase and were granted (Sept. 27, 1694,) the patent, the patentees being Jarvis Marshall and William Welch. At a later period (April 23, 1<08,) a patent to Lancaster Syms, Bob- er t Walter, and Hendrick Ten Eycke covered the vacant river front, described as “ beginning by the south bounds of Haverstraw, thence west to the northermost end of the land or island called Mattasink or Welch’s island, thence southerly to the southermost end of said island, then east to the creek that runs out of the pond upon Verdrietig hook and along the same to the Hudson, then north to the place of begin- ning, except the grant to Honan and Hawdon.” The patents described covered the entire district on the Hudson from the New Jersey line to New Paltz, and extended west to the line of the Shawangunk mountains. While they were being taken up, some entries had also been made on the Delaware river. Arent Schuyler, employed by the government as an interpreter of the Indian language and as an agent among the Indian tribes, obtained (May 20, 1697), on previous deed from the Minnismks, a patent for one thousand acres, more particularly described as a “tract of land in the Minnisink country called by the native Indians Sankhekeneek, other- wise Mayhawaem; also, another tract called Warinsayskmeck, situa- ted upon a river called Mennessineks before a certain island calledLAND TITLES—FIRST SETTLEMENTS. 25 Menagnock, which tract is adjacent or near to a tract of land called Maghaghkemek.” In the same year (Oct. 14,) a patent was granted to Jacob Codebec, Thomas Swartwout, Anthony Swartwout, Bernar- dus Swartwout, Jan Tyse, Peter Gimar, and David Jamison, for “ a certain quantity of land at a place called Maghaghkemek, being the quantity of one thousand two hundred acres; beginning at the west- ern bounds of the lands called Nepeneck, to a small stream of water called by the Indian name of Assawaghkemeek, and so along said run of water and the lands of Mansjoor the Indian.” It has been claimed that there was a settlement in the vicinity of the Swartwout patent sometime prior to the date of that instrument. At an early period that known as “the old mine road” was open- ed between Esopus and the Delaware, constructed, it is said, by a company of Dutch miners. This road ran through the Mamakating valley, north of’ the Shawangunk mountains, was continued in the valley of the Maghaghkemek branch of the Delaware, and penetrat- ed the Minnisinks proper east of that river. Here, it is added, the company discovered copper, worked a mine and transported its pro- duct over the road which they had constructed to the Esopus settle- ment. Unfortunately for the value of the tradition, the road was simply the enlargement of an Indian trail which had been followed for ages, while the mine referred to was in what is now the town of Warren, Sussex county, New Jersey. The boundaries of the ques- tion are still further circumscribed by the fact that the Dutch at Esopus, during the war of 1660,-63, had little knowledge of the country even east of the Shawangunk mountains, and that the Min- nisink country was penetrated, if at a much earlier period, by the way of the Delaware river. Nor is it true that the first settlement was on the Swartwout pat- ent. At the date of issue of that patent, Jacob Codebac, Thomas Swartwout, Anthony Swartwout and Peter Gimar* were residents of New Paltz or of Kingston. , They certainly had not made settlement on the Delaware in 1690. But there was settlement there, about that time, by one William Tietsoort,f a blacksmith, who in a petition to the governor and council of New York, dated April 10, 1708, states that he was formerly a resident of Schenectady, and that from the massacre at that place, in 1689, he barely escaped with his life; that * Peter Guimar, a native of Moir Saintonge, was married to Esther Hasbroucq, native of the Palatinate, at New Paltz, April 18th, 1692. He left his native place in company with Codebec in 1685, or rather the families of Abraham Guimar and James Codebec, of which he and Jacob Codebec were minor members, came out together. f It is by no means an improbable presumption that the Jan Tyse, named in the Code- bac patent, was the son of William Tietsoort. There is a simliarity in the sound of the names indicating clerical error in the orthography of the entry. Errors of this kind are not uncommon.26 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE QOUNTY. having friends in the Esopns country he removed thither, where, being known by the friendly Indians, he was invited by them to take up his residence in the Minnisink country, the Indians voluntarily grant- ing unto him a tract of land situate and being at Maghaghkemek, named and known by the name of Schaikaeckamick, in an elbow; that he obtained license to purchase, Oct. 15, 1698, that he so pur- chased, and that his possessions were subsequently assumed to be included in a purchase by and patent to Matthew Ling, against which he asked protection. There is very little room to doubt that he was the first settler on the western border. Active competition in the obtaining of patents sprang up at the opening of the succeeding century. Associations were formed, not unfrequently mainly composed of those holding official positions under the government, and large grants obtained. Three principal patents of this class, necessarily require notice in this connection. The first, the Chesekook Patent, was included in a purchase from “ Movingamaghan, Skawgus, Ughquaw, Onickotapp, and Aioqhquaherae, native Indians, proprietors,” December 80, 1702, by “Doctor John Bridges, Hendrick Ten Eycke, Derick Vandenburgh, John Cholwell, Christopher Denn, Lancaster Syms, and John Merritt,” of a “ certain tract of upland and meadow called Chesekook, bounded north by the patent line of Captain John Evans, to the west by the high hills of the Highlands, to the south by Honan and Hawdon’s patent, and to the east by the lands of the bounds of Haverstraw and Hud- son’s river,” and for which they received a patent March 25, 1707. The second, the Wawayanda Patent, was on a purchase (March 5, 1703,) from Rapingonick, Wawastawa, Moghopuck, Cornelawaw, Nan- awitt, Arawinack, Rombout, Claus, Chouckhass, Chingapaw, Oshasque- memus, and Quilapaw, native Indians and proprietors,” by “Doctor John Bridges, Hendrick Ten Eycke, Derick Vandenburgh* John Chol- well, Christopher Denn, Lancaster Syms, Daniel Honan, Philip Koke- by, John Merritt, Benjamin Aske, Peter Mathews, and Cornelius Christianse,” for a “ certain sum of money and goods,” of “ certain tracts or parcels of vacant lands named Waivayanda, and some other small tracts or parcels of land, being bounded on the eastward by the high hills of the Highlands and the patent of Capt. John Evans, on the north by the division line of the counties of Orange and Ulster, on the westward by the high hills to the eastward of Minnisinks, and on the south by the division line of the provinces of Hew York and East Jersey.” The patent was granted April 29, 1703. The third grant, the Minnisink Patent, was still more extensive. It was issued August 28, 1704, to Matthew Ling, Ebenezer Wilson, Philip French, Derick Vandenburgh, Stephen de Lancey, Philip Koke-APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ORIGINAL PATENTS.LAND TITLES—FIBST SETTLEMENTS. 27 by, John Corbett, Daniel Honan, Caleb Cooper, William Sharpas, Bobert Milward, Thomas Wenham, Lancaster Syms, John Person, Benjamin Aske, Petrus Bayard, John Cholwell, Peter Fanconier, Henry Swift, Hendrick Ten Eycke, Jarvis Marshall, Ann Bridges, (widow of John Bridges), and George Clark, and conveyed to them “ all that part of Orange and Ulster counties, beginning at a place in Ulster county called Hunting House, or Yagh House, lying* to the north-east of land called Baskets land, thence to run west by north v until it meets the Fishkill or main branch of Delaware river, thence to run southerly to the south end of Great Minnisink Island, thence due south to the land lately granted to John Bridges and Company (Wawayanda), and so along that patent as it runs northward and the patent of Captain John Evans, and thence to the place of begin- ning.” The grant consolidated two grants, one to Philip French and Company and one to Ebenezer Wilson and Company, and only ex- cepted from its sweeping boundaries the tract called Sankhekeneck or Mayhawaem, with a parcel of meadow called Warinsayskmeck, pre- viously granted to Arent Schuyler, and a tract called Maghaghkemek, near Nepeneck, granted to Jacob Codebac, and others. Had the purchasers a deed from the Indians ? Not only is there none on record, but Sir William Johnson writes: “An elderly man who lived in the Highlands, and at whose house I dined on my way from New York some years ago, told me that he lived with or in the neighborhood of Depuy, and was present when the said Depuy * pur- chased the Minnisink lands from the Indians; that when they were to sign the deed of sale he made them drunk and never paid them the money agreed upon. He heard the Indians frequently complain of the fraud, and declare that they would never be easy until they had satisfaction for their lands.” f When, in 1757 the wronged red men swept the western border with devastation, it was their declaration that they would never “ leave off killing the English until they were paid for their lands, mentioning* Minnisink almost to Hudson’s river.” The boundary lines of the Chesekook, Wawayanda, Minnisink, and Evans patents, were, for a long time, a disturbing element. They were entirely undefined, except in general terms. The west line of Chesekook and the east line of Wawayanda was designated by a mountain range; the east line of Minnisink and the west line of Wawayanda was also a mountain range, and so in part was the north line of both the Chesekook and the Wawayanda, or rather the south- * Samuel Depuy was settled on the. west bank of the Delaware,, three miles above the Water Gap. He was one of tke Walloons who came to New York about 1697. He be- came a large land owner in Pennsylvania, and .was well known to all who traveled “ the mine-road.” It is possible that he is referred to in the text. t MSS. of Sir Wm. Johnson, XXIV., 14. /28 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. west line of the Evans patent to which they ran. In the subsequent adjustment of the latter, together with that of the county line, a por- tion of the territory claimed by the Wawayanda patentees was cut off, while on the west an angle was formed, known as the Minnisink Angle, embracing a tract of one hundred and thirty thousand acres. The granting of immense tracts of land aroused the attention of the English government, in 1698. Investigation followed and result- ed in annulling the patent to Capt. Evans, by Act of the Assembly, May 12, 1699. Notwithstanding the policy of issuing patents for small tracts, upon which the repeal of the Evans patent was predi- cated, was abandoned in the almost immediately following issue of the Wawayanda, Minnisink, and similar large grants, the territory which the Evans patent covered was conveyed in small tracts by patents, issued at different periods from 1101 to 1775, but principally prior to 1750. *The location and settlement of these patents, as well as extended reference to the settlement of the Chesekook, Wawa- yanda, and Minnisink patents, will be given in connection with the history of the towns in which they were embraced or which were formed from them. It is through them that we may trace the foot- steps of the pioneers as they advanced from the Hudson on the east, along the valley of the Wallkill from the north, from the Delaware on the west, and from Haverstraw and Orangetown on the south,—a race of bold men and brave -women. In the enumeration of first settlements falling properly in this con- nection, that of the Palatine Parish of Quassaick requires notice. This settlement was composed of Germans from the Palatinate of the Rhine who, if not impoverished as principals were reduced to that condition in consequence of the devastation of their native district by the order and armies of Louis XIY. Accepting the overtures of the English government, a pioneer company reached London and was from thence sent by the government to America, supplied with imple- ments required for the construction of cabins and the clearing of land, and located on the vacated Evans patent, immediately north of Quas- saick creek, in the spring of 1709. This settlement formed the fourth principal centre of population in the district. The progress of settlement of the district during the century suc- ceeding the discovery, aside from the extinction of the aboriginal title and the issue of patents, is aproximately conveyed in the census of 1702, by which it appears that the population at that time, exclu- sive of the MacGregorie settlement, consisted of forty-nine men be- tween the ages of sixteen and sixty; forty married women; fifty-seven male and eighty-four female children; thirteen male negroes, seven negresses, and thirteen negro children.CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 29 CHAPTER HI. CIVIL GOVERNMENT-ORGANIZATION OF COUNTIES, PRECINCTS, AND TOWNS. 1683—1798. rriHE civil government of New York, under the Dutch, was an -X. extension of the laws and customs of Holland. Holland was an aggregate of towns, each providing for its own defense, administering its own finances, and governing itself by its own laws. The inhabi- tants of the towns were not, however, all upon an equality. To en- title a resident to every municipal franchise, burghership must be ac- quired. This was generally obtained by the payment of a sum of money, and the registry of the citizen’s name upon the roll of burgh- ers. It was a hereditary franchise; it could pass by marriage, and it could be acquired by females as well as males. Foreigners, also, after a year’s probation, could become burghers. The burgher right gave to the citizen freedom of trade, exemption from toll, special privileges and favors in prosecutions, and an exclusive eligibility to municipal office. The government of each town was administered by a Board of Magistrates, or burgomasters, and a certain number of schepens, or aldermen. The former provided for the public safety, at- tended to the police, mustered the burgher guard in case of danger, administered the finances, and assessed the taxes to be paid by each individual. In general, the term of office was annual. The burgo- masters and schepens were chosen by eight or nine “ good men ” elected by the wethouders, or inhabitants possessed of a certain prop- erty qualification. There was also another important officer, named the sellout, who, in early times, was appointed by the court, out of a triple nomination by the wethouders, whose duties were somewhat analagous to those of baliff or county sheriff, combining with them some of the duties of a prosecuting attorney.* Among the inducements offered by the burgomasters of the city of Amsterdam, to those who were “willing to settle in New Nether- land,” was the assurance that the place “ allotted for the residence of the colonists,” whether called “ a city or town,” should be regulated, “respecting the police or distribution of justice, and especially in the * Brodhead’s New York, L, 453, etc.30 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. matter of descents, in the same manner as in Amsterdam;” that each town should “have one schout, or officer, as the head of justice,” appointed as in Amsterdam; three burgomasters, who should be “ ap- pointed by the common burghers out of the most honest, fit and rich;” and “five or seven schepens, to be* appointed by the director-general out of double that number of persons who should be nominated by the wethouders. The schepens were to have jurisdiction in causes “for all sums under one hundred guilders,” and to “pronounce sen- tence in all criminal causes,” subject to appeal to the director-gen- eral. Towns of two hundred families were to be empowered to choose a common council of twenty-one persons” to take the direc- tion of the local government, appoint the burgomasters, and nomi- nate the schepens. The civil governments established by the English were of two classes. The New England colonies were under charters, or grants of the crown, enabling the people to. elect their own governors and legislative assemblies, and establish courts of justice. Virginia, New York, New Jersey, the Carolinas, and Georgia, had royal or provincial governments possessing no power except that conferred directly by the king; their governors held their offices at the king's appointment and during his pleasure; councils, selected from the principal men of the provinces, acted as advisors of the governors and constituted one branch of the legislatures; no laws were valid unless approved by the king. The government of New York differed from that of Virginia in this, that while the latter had been founded as an English province, the former was a conquered territory in which the existing laws and customs could not be immediately and radically changed without serious difficulty. Nor was the attempt made. When the English succeeded the Dutch, the latter were left for some time undisturbed in the franchises which they had enjoyed, and were permitted to grow into the new system by gradual process. The changes which were immediately made were more in terms than in substance. “A Court of Assizes was established, which, like its New Netherland prototype, was the supreme tribunal of the province, having both law and equity, as well as appellate jurisdic- tion. In this court the governor and his counselors possessed the same powers that had formerly been exercised by the Dutch director and his counselors, while the court itself was invested with the su- preme power of making, altering, and abolishing any law in the gov- ernment.”* Local laws were left untouched. But there was an English element • in the province to be consulted and strengthened. A considerable portion of Long Island, Staten * Brodhead II., 62, etc.CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 31 Island, and Westchester, had been settled by English families, of whom those living on Long Island were already organized under the charter of Connecticut. To continue their privileges, as well as to ftgm the basis of the new system, they were erected into a shire or county under the name of Yorkshire, and divided into ridings, dis- tricts or precincts. These ridings were three in number: “East Riding,” including what is now Suffolk county, “West Riding,” in- cluding Staten Island, Kings county, Newtown and part of West- chester county, and “ North Riding,” including the present county of Queens, over which the governor and council were to appoint a high- sheriff every year, to be taken from each riding in succession. To each riding was given justices of the peace, who were to continue in office during the governor’s pleasure, and who were to hold in their respective jurisdictions a court of sessions three times in each year. Besides their local duties, the high-sheriff and the justices were to sit with the governor and his council in the Court of Assizes, which was to meet in New York once in each year. In the deliberations of the court the Dutch towns of New York* Albany, and Esopus had no voice. In establishing a code of laws the same distinction in population was observed. Instead of inviting delegates from the several towns of the province to meet in convention, the people of Long Island and Westchester were asked to do so; New York, Albany, Esopus, and other Dutch towns, were excluded. The code which was adopted by this convention,—which met at Hempstead on the 28th of February, 1665,—was known as the “Duke’s Laws,” and while general in most of its provisions, so far as its future application was possible in the organization of towns, was primarily local in its force. The Court of Assizes was recognized as an existing institution, and Was to hold a session in New York once in each year; but in pressing capital cases, the governor and council might issue commissions of Oyer and Terminer. Inferior Courts of Sessions, composed of the justices of the peace, were also continued as they had been estab- lished. Trials by jurymen, who were not to exceed seven, except in capital cases, were provided for. Arbitrators might be appointed in small causes between neighbors. Wherever the law was silent in any case, the Sessions were to remit it to the next Assizes, where matters of equity were to be decided and punishment awarded “ac- cording to the discretion of the bench, and not contrary to the known laws of England.” Each town was given “ a local court for the trial of causes under five pounds, which was to be held by the constable and six overseers, and from which there was an appeal to the Ses- sions.” Eight “ men of good fame and life,” were to be chosen as32 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. overseers of each town by a majority of the freeholders. Four of these overseers retired at the end of each year, and from them a con- stable was to be annually chosen, on the first or second of April, by the freeholders, who was to be confirmed by the justices at the next Sessions. The constable and overseers had power to make local or- dinances in their several towns. A high-sheriff was to be annually appointed by the governor from each riding in rotation, and also an under-sheriff or high constable in* each riding. Justices of the peace were to be appointed by the governor and continued in office during his pleasure. Assessments were to be made in every year, after the first of June, by the officers of each town. Provision was made for the enforcement of the rates imposed; and general regulations in re- gard to the tenure of lands and other matters, were adopted. No material changes were made in this system until 1682, when, yielding fo the demand of the people for a representative govern- ment, the king appointed Colonel Thomas Dongan governor of the province and gave him instructions to organize a new council, to be composed of not exceeding ten of “the most eminent inhabitants,” and to issue writs to the proper officers for the election of “ a gener- al assembly of all 'the freeholders by the persons who they shall choose to represent them,” in order to consult with him and his coun- cil “ what laws are fit and necessary to be made and established ” for the good government of the province “ and all the inhabitants there- of.” On the 17th of October, 1683, the assembly thus authorized met at Fort James in New York. It was composed of delegates from all parts of the province, and during its session of three weeks, passed fourteen several acts, which were assented to by the governor and his council. Among these laws was one “to divide this Province and dependencies into shires and counties,” and one “to settle Courts of Justice.” Twelve counties were established by the former: New York, Kings, Queens, Suffolk, Richmond, Westchester, Albany, Ulster, Duchess, Orange, Duke’s, and Cornwall, which, with the ex- ception of Duchess, which was placed under the care of Ulster, and Orange, which was similarly associated with New York, were to be entitled to representation in future general assemblies. The law re- lating to courts established four distinct tribunals: Town Courts, for the trial of small causes, to be held each month; County Courts, or Courts of Sessions, to be held at certain times, quarterly or half yearly; a General Court of Oyer and Terminer, with original and ap- pellate jurisdiction, to sit twice in every year in each county, and a Court of Chancery, to be the “ Supreme Court of the Province,” com- posed of the governor and council, with power in the goveriior to de- pute a chancellor in his stead, and appoint clerks and other officers.CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 33 The Court of Assizes having “ ceased and determined,” was replaced by the Court of Oyer and Terminer. This system continued until 1691, when courts of justices of the ■ peace were organized in every town, and one of Common Pleas for every county One of the leading features in the early civil divisions established by the English, was the organization of precincts. Cities and towns had been established by the Dutch prior to English occupation; a few English towns existed on Long Island, as already stated, and a few town charters were subsequently granted, by the governor and coun- cil, to companies or associated colonists; but precincts were entirely different in their constitution and government, and of necessity be- came more numerous. Primarily, they were composed of the scat- tered settlements of contiguous territory organized by the courts as court districts, and attached to some adjoining town for assessment and local government. Their boundaries were crude; their popula- tion small; their officers such as were known only to the county at large. Subsequently, as population increased, their boundaries were more clearly defined, and officers assigned to them. So numerous did these divisions ultimately become that towns were almost entirely lost sight of, until after the Revolution, when the distinction, which then existed only in name, was removed. In 1701, the Assembly, by act of October 18, provided that the jus- tices of the peace of the several counties, “.or any five or more of them, two whereof to be a quorum,” should, once in the year, at a court of general or special sessions, supervise, examine and allow the public and necessary charge of their respective county, and of every town thereof,” including the “allowance made by law to their representative or representatives.” For the assessment and collec- tion of the accounts allowed by them, they were “ empowered to issue their warrant to the several towns for the election of two as- sessors and one collector in. each town. The act further provided that the “justices at the respective general sessions,” should, “once in the year, make provision for maintenance and support of the poor” of their several towns or precincts. This law continued in force until June 1703, when it was enacted, that there should be “ elected and chosen, once every year, in each town, by the freeholders and inhabitants thereof, one of their free- holders and inhabitants, to compute, ascertain, examine, oversee, and allow the contingent, public, and necessary charge of each county, and that each and every inhabitant, being a freeholder in any manor, liberty, jurisdiction, precinct, and out-plantation, shall have liberty to join his or their vote with the next adjacent town in the county, where such inhabitants shall dwell, for the choice of a supervisor.”34 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. The law also provided that there should be annually chosen “ in each town, ward, manor, and precinct, by the freeholders and inhabitants thereof, two assessors and one collector.77 The elections were to be held “on the first Tuesday in April,77 or on such other days as were “appointed by their charters and patents.77 The supervisors were required to meet annually, “ at the county town in each respective county, on the first Tuesday in October; and at such other time and times as they should “judge and find necessary and convenient,77 and then and there “compute the public necessary contingent charges against their respective counties,77 together with “ such other sum and sums of money77 as should be “brought and exhibited to or be- fore them,77 to be levied on their respective “ counties by the laws of the colony.77 When the computation was “ perfected, and the propor- tion of each town, manor, liberty, jurisdiction, and precinct, ascer- tained and appointed,77 it was to be transmitted to the assessors, who were “ required, equally, duly, and impartially, to assess and make a rate for their respective proportions,77 being first sworn to make such assessment equally and impartially. The assessment, when com- pleted, was to be delivered to the collectors, who were empowered to collect and pay the same to the county treasurer,77 who was to be “ annually chosen in each county by the supervisors.77 The changes which, up to this time, had been made in the civil gov- ernment, it will be observed, consisted in substituting courts of jus- tices of the peace, for the courts held by overseers under the law of 1665. Constables were continued in each town, and in addition the towns were authorized to elect supervisors, assessors and collectors. Officers equivalent .to the present commissioners of highways were given to the towns in 1691, by an act “ impowering77 the freehold- ers “to nominate and make choice in each of their respective towns, annually, three persons to be surveyors and orderers of the work for laying out and the amendment of the highways and fences within the bounds and limits of their respective towns.77 This law also gave power to the freeholders of the towns, when assembled for the elect- ion of the officers to which they were entitled, “to make, establish, constitute, and ordain, such prudential orders and rules, for the better improvement of their lands in tillage, pasturage, or any other reason- able way,77 as the majority should deem “good and convenient.77 It was under these general laws that the district of country now forming part of Ulster county, and the whole of Orange and Rock- land counties, had its organization and development. The act of .1683, dividing the province into shires and counties, provided: “The County of Ulster to contain the towns of Kingston, Hurley and Mar- bletown, and all the villages, neighborhoods and Christian habitationsORIGINAL COUNTY OF ORANGE. ' From Sautliier’s Map, 1779.COUNTY AND PRECINCT ORGANIZATIONS. 35 on the west side of Hudson’s river, from the Murderer’s creeke, near the Highlands, to Sawyer’s creeke. The County of Orange * to be- ginne from the limitts or bounds of East and West Jersey, on the west side of Hudson’s river: along the said river to Murderer’s creeke, or bounds of the county of Ulster; and westward into the woods as far as Delaware river.” These boundaries, though crude and illustrative of the imperfect knowledge of the country which then prevailed, were destined to be substantially maintained for over one hundred years. The organization of towns and precincts in the county of Orange began with that of the town of Orange in 1686.f Soon after its or- ganization the inhabitants of the adjoining patents, including Haver- straw, were attached to it, for court jurisdiction and assessment. By act of the assembly, June 24, 1719,—in response to a petition of the inhabitants of Haverstraw, reciting the inconveniences of asso- ciation with Orangetown,—the northern settlements were included in a precinct under the title of the Precinct of Haverstraw, thereby cre- ating two precincts, viz: Orangetown with Tappan as its center, and Haverstraw with the “ Christian patented lands of Haverstraw” as its center. The boundaries of the latter were “from the northermost bounds of Tappan to the northermost bounds of Haverstraw.” Its inhabitants were authorized to elect, on the first Tuesday in April annually, the officers common to a town, viz: “One supervisor, one collector, two assessors, one constable, and two overseers of high- ways,” who should be “invested with all the powers, and be obliged to perform such services and duties ” as pertained to similar officers. The settlements of Goshen, Warwick, Gray Court, etc., on the Wa- wayanda patent, were given organization as the Precinct of Goshen sometime about 1714, the township of Goshen becoming the political center. J Under the general law of 1703, it was entitled to two assessors, a collector, overseers of highways, and a constable. It remained without change until 1743, when it was empowered to elect, in addition to its other officers, two constables, one of whom should be “from and out of such of the inhabitants” as had their residence in the south part of the precinct, “commonly called Wawayanda,” and the other from “the inhabitants to the northward, near the meet- ing house commonly called the water-side meeting house.” The terri- tory embraced in the precinct included the entire county, with the * “ So called in compliment to the Dutch son-in-law of James Second.”—Brodhead. Known as the Prince or Orange—subsequently William Third of England. f Ante p. 28. t Goshen was founded as a township, precisely as was Orangetown, and was similarly included in the subsequent precinct organization with other settlements. . It should be observed, however, that in these and similar cases of prior township organizations the adjoining settlements were the precincts of the town to which they were .attached, 0336 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. exception of the Haverstraw and Orangetown districts, and extend- ed from the Delaware to Hudson’s river.* * * § By act of assembly, Octo- ber 20, 1764, it was divided by “ a straight line to be run, beginning at the borders or verge of the county of Ulster, near the new dwell- ing house of John Manno, thence on a course which will leave the house of Barnabas Horton, Jr., ten chains to the westward, to the most extreme parts of said precinct;f all the lands lying to the west of said line to be Goshen Precinct, and all eastward to be called New Cornwall Precinct. These two precincts, with the precincts of Hav- erstraw and Orangetown, constituted the political divisions of the county until after, the revolution. Subsequently and prior to 1797-98, the following changes were made: The title of precinct was changed to that of town in the cases of Orangetown, Haverstraw, Goshen, and New Cornwall, in 1788, J at which time the towns of Warwick and Minnisink were erected from Goshen; from Haverstraw the towns of Clarjistown and Rarnapo were erected in 1791; New Cornwall chang- ed its title to Cornwall in 1797. These changes gave to the county, in 1798, the towns of Orangetown, Haverstraw, Clarkstown, Rarnapo, Goshen, Warwick, Minnisink, and Cornwall. From this survey of the county of Orange we pass to notice the civil divisions of Ulster county so far as they were embraced in the district which we are considering. Immediately north of Murderer’s creek there was no civil organization until the advent of the Palatines in 1709,§ when the Precinct of the Highlands was erected and attached to NewPaltz At the same time or soon after, and evidently by order of the court, the Precinct of Maghaghk&mek || and the Precinct of Sha- * That portion of the precinct lying west of the Minnisink mountains was subjected to several political changes: By act of October 18,1701, “ for the more regular proceedings in Election of Representatives,’” the inhabitants of “ Wagachemeck and Great and Little Minnisink” were “ impowered to give their votes in the county of Ulster.” By act of November 12,1709, “ to determine, settle, and ascertain the bounds and limits of the county of Orange,” the act of October 15, 1701, was repealed so far as it related to the settlements named, which were in effect declared to be a part of Orange county. By subsequent survey Maghaghkemek (Cuddebackville) was found to be north of the line of Orange, and hence passed to the jurisdiction of Ulster, appearing on .the tax-roll as the ‘ ‘ Neighborhood of Maghaghkemek.” It remained in this political relation until 1798, when the town of Deerpark was erected as one of the consequences of the reorganization of Orange county, of which it became part. The other settlements were included (after 1709) in the precinct of Goshen; subsequently in the town of Minnisink (1788), from which they were taken (1798) and included in the boundaries of Deerpark. f This line is said to have been parallel with the west line of the present town of Monroe, t The erection of towns at this date, wherever situated in the state, was under a gen- eral law passed March 7th, 1788, entitled, “ An act for dividing the counties of this state into towns.” § So much of the district as was embraced in the Evans patent, was, by the terms of that instrument, erected into the “ Manor and Lordship of Eletcherdon,” with the usual authority conferred in manorial grants, but, in the absence of other population than that. included in the MacGregorie settlement, it is not probable that even the civil jurisdiction of a manorial court was established during the few years the grant was continued. || The correctness of this statement having been questioned, we quote from the act of. December 17th, 1748: “And whereas Shawangunk, Highlands and Maghaghkemek have formerly been deemed and esteemed three precincts, and have been assessed by their own assessors,” &c. It was subsequently included in the Precinct of Mamakating.COUNTY AND PRECINCT ORANIZATIONS. 37 wangunk were constituted, the latter attached to New Paltz. Under this limited organization the territory which these precincts covered remained until 1743, when, by act of December 17th, three full pre- cincts, having all the officers .of towns and exercising all their duties, were established. These precincts were to be known and called “ by the name of the Waif Mil Precinct, Shawangunk Precinct, and High- land Precinct.” The first, the Precinct of Wallkillj was bounded on the north “ by the north bounds of ten thousand acres of land grant- ed to Jeremiah Schuyler and others, by the south bounds of four thousand acres of land granted to Gerardus Beekman and others, by the north bounds of three thousand acres of land granted to Henry Wileman and others, by the east bounds of three thousand acres of land granted to John Johnson, and by the east bounds of two thou- sand acres of land granted -to Cadwallader Oolden;” on the south ■“'by the north bounds of two thousand acres of land granted to Patrick Hume, by the north and west bounds of the land granted to Cornelius Low and others, and by the north-west and south-west bounds of two thousand acres of land granted to Phineas McIntosh, and by the line dividing the counties of Orange and Ulster to Sha- wangunk mountains.” In more general terms the district was de- fined as “ bounded westerly by the Shawangunk mountains as they run from the county of Orange to a creek or river called the Platte- kill, then along the Plattekill to Shawangunk river, then all aldng Shawangunk river to the north bounds of the ten thousand acres granted to Jeremiah Schuyler aforesaid.” The freeholders were re- quired to “ meet at the house of Matties Millspaugb, on the first Tues- day of April yearly,” or at such other place as should be selected by the inhabitants after the first meeting, and elect one supervisor, two assessors, a collector, a constable and an overseer of the poor. One of the assessors was to be located on the west side of the Wallkill, “and because the said Wallkill river, which crosses the said precinct, is sometimes dangerous to pass,” one collector and one constable were added to the officers of the precinct “for that part thereof which lieth to the westward of said river.” The second, the Precinct of Shawangunk, was bounded on the west “by the foot of Shawangunk mountains; on the south and west by the precinct of Wallkill; on the east by the line or bounds of three thousand five hundred acres granted to Rip Van Dam and others, by the east bounds of two thousand acres of land granted to Barbarie, and by the east bounds or line of two thousand acres of land_ granted to Huddleston; and on the north by the north bounds or line of the said two thousand acres granted to Huddleston, by the north bounds of two thousand acres granted to Peter Matthews and others;” on38 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. the south, by a line “ crossing the said Wallkill river to the mouth of Shawangunk river, and running thence south-westerly all along the north-west side of said Shawangunk river to the south-west corner of the land granted, to Colonel Jacob Rutzen;” and on the west by the “ westerly bounds or line of said land granted to Rutzen to a salt pond, called ‘the great salt pond/ and from * thence upon a west line to the foot of Shawangunk mountains aforesaid.” The first pre- cinct meeting was to be held at the house of Benjamin Smedes, Jr., at which a supervisor, two assessors, and the usual precinct officers were to be chosen, and the place of subsequent meetings designated. The Precinct of the Highlands embraced the patents lying along the Hudson from Murderer’s creek to New Paltz, and was more par- ticularly described as “ bounded on the east by Hudson’s river; on the south by the line dividing the counties of Ulster and Orange; on the west by the precincts of Wallkill and Shawangunk and the neighborhoods annexed to the New Paltz,* and on the north by the bounds or line of New Paltz town.” The precinct meetings were to be held “ at the house of John Humphrey, Jr., on the first Tuesday of April, annually,” for the election of precinct officers. The same act gave primary constitution to the Precinct of Mama- bating, in which was included “ all the land to the southward of the town of Rochester as far as the county of Ulster extends, and to the westward of the precincts of Wallkill and Shawangunk as far as the county extends.” The first precinct meeting was to be held at the dwelling house of Samuel Swartwout, at which one constable, two assessors, two overseers of the poor and two surveyors of highways were to be elected. In the election of supervisor the freeholders were associated with the town of Rochester. Under the law of 1198, the northern part of the territory included in the then town of Deerpark was taken from this precinct. The precinct of the Highlands continued in existence until 1762, when it was divided into the precincts of Newburgh and New Wind- sor, “by a line beginning at the mouth of Quassaick creek, and run- ning thence along the south bounds of a tract of land commonly called the German patent, to another tract granted to Alexander Baird, and then along the southerly bounds of the said last mention- ed tract to the Wallkill precinct; all the lands heretofore compre- hended within the said Highland precinct lying to the southward of * The “neighborhoods annexed to New Paltz,” were “Guilford, and several other patents, from the south bounds of New Paltz to the north bounds of Shawangunk pre- cinct, and from the foot of the high mountains eastward to the east line of the patent granted to Thomas Garland, and by the south and east by the land granted to Hugh Freer and others, and to the eastward by an east lino from the said Hugh Freer’s bounds to the bounds or line of New Paltz.” The freeholders were to vote with the freeholders of New Paltz and in all respects to be considered a part of that town.COUNTY AND PRECINCT ORGANIZATIONS. 39 the aforesaid dividing line to be called by the name of New Windsor Precinct, and all the lands heretofore comprehended within the said Highland precinct lying to the northward of the said line to be called by the name of Newburgh Precinct.” The latter was divided, in 1772, by a line running along the north bounds of the Harrison, Bradley, Wallace, Kip and Cruger, and Jamison patents, to the precinct of Shawangunk, “ all the land lying to the northward of said line, to be called and known by the name of New Marlborough Precinct, and all the land south of said line to continue to be called Newburgh Precinct.” The same law divided the precinct of Wallkill by a line beginning at the south-west corner of the McIntosh patent and the south-east corner of McKnight’s, “ thence along the south-west bounds of Thom- as Noxon, the south-west bounds of Harrison and Company, the south- west bounds of Philip Schuyler, to the Pakadasink river or Shawan- gunk kill;” all north-east of this line “to be called the Precinct of Hanover and all the land south-west of said line, heretofore compre- hended in the precinct of Wallkill, to continue to be called the Pre- cinct of Wallkill.” The precincts named carried with them their designative titles in their organization as towns under the act of 1188, with the exception of Hanover, whose inhabitants, for the purpose of attesting their de- testation of the English government as well as their appreciation of the heroic services of General Richard Montgomery, obtained consent, from the provincial convention of the state, in 1782, to change the precinct name to Montgomery. By the act of 1788, they were seve^ rally erected as the towns of Newburgh, New Windsor, New Marlbo- rough, Shawangunk, Montgomery, and Wallkill. The changes which had been made from time to time in their organization were the out- growth of increasing population and the necessary convenience of local administration. But their sub-division, especially after the war of the revolution, did not entirely meet the emergencies which the rapid increase of population demanded. The people of Newburgh and the neighboring southern towns of Ulster county, were requir- ed to transact their county business at Kingston, while those of Cornwall and the north-eastern part of Orange were compelled to at- tend courts and enter their records at Orangetown. In either case the county seat was thirty miles or more distant, and in precisely op- posite directions, while the facilities for communication, for a large portion of the time, were most exceptionable. The inhabitants of the western part of Orange.were better accommodated, Goshen having been made, at an early period, a half-shire district; still their records were kept at Orangetown, and a considerable portion of their court40 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. business was necessarily transacted there. To inaugurate the correction of these inconveniences a convention of delegates from the several towns interested was held at Ward’s Bridge* on the 6th of April, 1793, but without other result than the agitation of the question, and the half-expressed willingness of the delegates from Goshen to a union of the northern towns of Orange and the southern towns of Ulster in a new county organization, with courts alternately at Newburgh and Goshen. A second convention was held at the house of John Decker, at Otterkill, in February, 1794, with no better result, the delegates from Newburgh being instructed to decline “any union at all” unless it should be agreed that a court house be erected and courts held at Newburgh and Goshen alternately,f a proposition which the Goshen delegates were not fully disposed to concede. "Here the matter rested until 1797, when a third convention assem- bled, similarly composed, at Kerr’s hotel in Little Britain. At this convention, General Wilkin and General Hopkins, from Orange, and Daniel Niven and Isaac Belknap, Sr., from Ulster, appointed a com- mittee to report terms upon which a union should be formed, agreed to a stipulation that the courts should be held at Newburgh and Goshen alternately, and the convention ratified it. The subject came before the legislature in the winter of 1797-98. Two bills were presented—one entitled “An Act for Dividing the County of Orange,” the other, “ An Act for Altering the bounds of the Coun- ties of Orange and Ulster.” The first was passed on the 23d of February, and enacted: “That all that tract of land in the county of Orange, lying north-west of a line beginning at the mouth of Poplo- pen’s kill, on Hudson’s river, and running from thence to the south- eastermost corner of the farm of Stephen Sloat, and then along the south bounds of his farm to the south-west corner thereof, and then on the same course to the bounds of the state of New Jersey,| shall be and hereby is erected into a separate county, and shall be called and known by the name of Orange;” and, “That all that part of the said county of Orange lying southward of the above described line shall be erected into a separate county, and shall be called and known by the name of Rockland.” The act also made provision for holding courts, fixed the number of members of assembly, etc. The. second act was passed on the 5th of April following. It enacted, “ That the * Now the village of Montgomery. t Newburgh Town Records, Feb. 1, 1794. t Act of April 3d, 1801, gives this line as from the middle of Hudson’s river “west to the mouth of Poplopen’s kill, and from thence on a direct course to the east end of the mill dam now or late of Michael Weiman across the Ramapough river, and from thence a direct course to the twenty-mile stone standing in the said division line between this state and the state of New* Jersey.”COUNTY AND PRECINCT ORGANIZATIONS. 41 towns of New Windsor, Newburgh, Wallkill, Montgomery and Deer- park, now in the county of Ulster, shall be and hereby are annexed to the county of Orange/7 and made provision for holding courts al- ternately at Newburgh and Goshen, the latter being the county seat With these enactments the records of the original county were closed, and from the heart of the patents and precincts covering the district described “ in the beginning/7 was erected the present county, bearing, under the title of Orange, the colonial and revolutionary history of the territory which it embraced, the most populous * and fertile of the lands of the original district, and more than two-thirds of its wealth,—elements which gave to it immediate prominence in state and national politics, and which, under subsequent and pro- gressive developement, have maintained its rank among the first counties of* the state. The boundary lines of the new county were definitely fixed by the general law of April 3d, 1801, entitled: “■An Act to divide this State into Counties/7 as follows: “The county of Orange to contain all that part of this state bounded easterly by the middle of Hudson’s river, southerly by the said county of Eockland and the division line between this state and the state of New Jersey, westerly by the river Mongaap *j* and the division line between this state and the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and northerly by a line drawn from a point in the middle, of said Hudson’s river opposite the north-east corner of a tract of land granted to Francis Harrison and Company, called the five thousand acre tract, to the said north-east corner, and running from thence westerly along the north bounds of the said tract and the north bounds of another tract granted to the said Francis Har- * The population of the original county of Orange, and that part of Ulster included in the district, was (1790) as follows: ULSTER COUNTY: Mamakating,.................... 1,763 Montgomery,.................... 3,563 Newburgh,....................... 2,365 New Windsor,.................... 1,819 , New Marlborough,............... 2,241 Shawangunk,..................... 2,128 Wallkill,...................... 2,571 Total,..................... 18,492 16,450 The following were the towns included in the new county, under the same census: ORANGE COUNTY! Cornwall,....................... 4,225 Goshen,....................... 2,448 Haverstraw,..................... 4,826 Minnisink,..................... 2,2l5 Orangetown,..................... 1,175 Warwick,........................ 3,603 TOWNS FROM ORANGE: Cornwall,.....'................ 4,225 Goshen.......................... 2,448 Minnisink,___................... 2,215 Warwick,...................... 3,603 TOWNS FROM ULSTER: Montgomery,..................... 3,563 Newburgh,....................... 2,365 New Windsor,.................... 1,819 Wallkill,...................... 2,571 Total,....................... 12,491 ............................... 10,318 The census of 1800, immediately following the erection of the new county, gave its pop- ulation as 29,368, and that of the towns not included as 14,807—showing the population of the district at that time to be 44,175. f Originally known as the Mingmng. Mongaap is presumed to be Dutch. It is en- tered on Sauthier’s map, “ Manga wping.” While the old county line ran to the Delaware river, the new line stopped at the Mongaap; it was also further north than the old line,42 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. rison to the tract of land commonly called Wallace’s tract, then along the lines of the same northerly and westerly to the north-easterly bounds of a tract of land granted to Jacobus Kip, John Cruger and others, commonly called Kip and Cruger’s tract, then westerly along the north-easterly and northerly bounds thereof, and then westerly to the north-east corner of a tract of three thousand acres granted to Rip Yan Dam and others, thence southerly along the same to the north-east corner of a tract of three thousand acres granted to Henry Wileman, and running thence along the north bounds thereof to the Paltz river, commonly called the Wallkill, then southerly up the said river to the south-east corner of a tract of four thousand acres of land granted to Gerardus Beekman and others, then westerly and northerly along the southerly and westerly bounds thereof to the north-east corner thereof, and then north-westerly along the north bounds of the land granted to Jeremiah Schuyler and Company to the Shawangunk kill, thence southerly along said kill to the north part of the farm now or late in the occupation of Joseph Wood, Jr., thence west to the river Mongaap.” By act of the 7th of April of the same year definite boundary lines were given to the towns com- posing the newly constructed county, namely: Blooming-Grove, Chesekook, Cornwall, Deerpark, Goshen, Minnisink, Montgomery, New Windsor, Newburgh, Wallkill, and Warwick.* Incident to the history of the original county, it is proper to re- mark, in this connection, that although organized in 1683, it was only a county in name—a district in the wilderness with boundaries upon paper. It was not until nearly twenty years later that it became a county de facto. True, it was assigned a sheriff and a clerk, and had a jail, but it was attached to New York in other re- spects in the character of a borough. Governor Leisler, in his ill- starred rebellion, attempted to use it (1691) by appointing, as one of his council, William Lawrence of New York, as representing Orange, and when it was given representation in the assembly (1699), it was not as a right due to population, but to serve another purpose. Prac- tically, the organization of the county began in 1703, when the first session of the court, and the first meeting of justices acting as a board of supervisors, was held, f Such local administration as it had, * From the territory embraced in the towns named, the following additional towns were erected: Chester, 1845, from Goshen, Warwick, Blooming-Grove, and Monroe; Crawford, 1823, from Montgomery; Greenville, 1858, from Minnisink; Hamptonburgli, 1830, from Goshen, Blooming-Grove, Montgomery, New Windsor, and Wallkill; Mount Hope, 1833, from Wallkill, Minnisink and Deerpark; Wawayanda, 1849, from Minnisink; Highlands, from Cornwall, 1872; the city of Newburgh, 1866, from Newburgh. The county now embraces eighteen towns, one city, and six incorporated villages. f The record book contains this entry: “Register kept for Orange county, begun ye 5th day of April, Anno Domini 1703.” The earlier records were probably kept in New York to which the county was attached.GO UR TS AND CO UR T HO USES. 43 aside from the officers of its precincts, may be briefly stated. Minnie Johannes was its first sheriff, 1685; Floris Willeinse Crom, in 1690; Stanley Handcock, in 1694; John Patersen, in 1699, and Theunis Toleman in 1701. The latter was not held in very high esteem by Governor Oornbury, who apparently regarded the ability of a man to write his own name as a qualification. Dirck Storm was the county clerk, or clerk of the court, in 1691, and William Huddleston in 1703. Judges of common pleas came in in 1701, William Merritt being the first judge. The first session of the court was held at Orangetown, April 28, 1703,—present: William Merritt and John Merritt, judges. The first recorded session of justices of the peace, acting as a board of supervisors, was held April 27, 1703,—present: William Merritt, John Merritt, Cornelius Cuyper, Tunis Van Houton, Thomas Burroughs, Michael Hawdon, justices; John Perry, sheriff; William Huddleston, clerk, and Conradt Hauson, constable. Prom this time the record is continuous. Many franchises were dependent upon population. Of this char- acter were surrogate’s courts. The first law of the province relating to estates gave to courts of common pleas power to take proof of wills and grant letters of administration in remote counties. Other coun- ties, including Orange and Ulster, were required to transact such business in New York. This was changed by act of November, 24, 1750, which relates that whereas, at the time of the enactment of the law providing that in remote counties courts of common pleas should be authorized to take the examination of witnesses to any will, on oath, and to grant letters of administration, the “ county of Orange was not considered and esteemed one of the remote counties,” but that since the passage of the said act, “the north-west parts of the said county, being nearly one hundred miles distance from the city of New York,” had “increased greatly in number of inhabitants, as well by families removed to. those parts, as otherwise,” who were laboring under “the like inconveniences as those of said remote counties,” that therefore the judges and justices of the said court of common pleas, and the clerk of the said county, be vested with au- thority to take such examinations and issue such letters of adminis- tration. This arrangement was continued until 1754, when William Finn was appointed surrogate and a surrogate’s court established. The courts held their sessions at Orangetown exclusively until 1727, when Goshen was given alternate terms. The first county buildings were erected at Orangetown, sometime about 1703. At the first court of sessions held by justices of the peace, April 5th, 1703, an examination of the “common gaol of the county” was or- dered and directions given to complete the same. By act of the as-44 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY\ sembly, December 16th, 1737, “the justices of the peace of that part of Orange county lying to the northward of the Highlands,” were “authorized to build a court house and gaol for the said county at Goshen.” This building was completed under act of November 3d, 1740, by which one hundred pounds were authorized to be raised for the purpose on the portion of the county already najned. It wap a Structure of wood and stone; was repaired in 1754, and was torn down in 1775 or 1776, a new stone court house having been erected. The latter was on the site now occupied by the office of the county clerk in Goshen. Its erection was provided for under an act of the assembly, March 12th, 1773, by which one thousand pounds were raised for the purpose on the precincts of Goshen and Cornwall. Four hundred pounds additional were raised in 1774 to finish it, and prisoners were removed to it under act of April 1st, 1775. It was originally two stories high. A third story, it is said, was added to it in 1801-2, the first story being occupied by debtors’ cells, .the second by the court room, and the third by cells for criminals. It was re- moved in 1842, when the present court house was erected. Mean- while the old court house at Orangetown was replaced by a new structure in 1704, the expense being borne by the “ southern part of the county.” It was subsequently destroyed by fire. Aside from their town and precinct officers and representatives in the assembly, the people had no voice in the selection of their rulers. The sheriffs held the elections for representatives and the choice was determined by the viva voce * vote of the freeholders, who were required to be twenty-one years of age, and to . be possessed of “ land or tenements improved to the value of forty pounds free from all incumbrances.” Freeholders having property in more than one county, could vote in as many counties as they had property liable to taxation, and for their accommodation the elections were so ordered that opportunity was given them to cast the full number of votes to which they were entitled. It could scarcely be called a representa- tive system, so far as representative systems are understood to ex- press the popular will; it was more properly a property representa- tion under which power was given to a few persons. The districts were large; the population was scattered; the elections were held at the “county towns;” the polls were kept open several days to enable all to vote wholnight wish to do so. Where the conveniences existed for transit from point to point, as they did along the Hudson, a free- holder residing in New York was enabled to vote in half a dozen counties if holding property therein, while those occupying more in- * Until after the adoption of the Constitution of 1777. Voting by ballot was regarded by the framers of that instrument as an experiment,COLONIAL POLITICS. 45 land locations were in most cases necessarily deprived of a voice in elections. Until 1699, the freeholders of the county were associated with those of New York in the selection of representatives, but were not obliged to visit New York in order to give their votes. The sheriff of the county held the election at Orangetown, and made return to the sheriff of New York, who declared the result. In 1699 the county was given representation in the assembly. At this and subsequent elections until 1749, the poll was held exclusively at Orangetown, and those who wished to vote were compelled to visit that place. This was in part remedied by the law of 1748, by which it was provided that, “for the time to come, all elections for representa- tives” should be opened, “either at the court house or some conveni- ent place in Orangetown; or at the court house or some convenient place in Goshen,” and after being held for a certain time at the place where first opened, should be adjourned “to the other court house or place of election, so that all the freeholders may, if they please, be polled at such elections.” * That the system was corrupt, especially in the earlier years of its administration, is a fact revealed on every page of the history of that period. Frauds upon the revenue pervaded all departments of the public service; piratical expeditions, including that of the notori- ous Captain Kidd, were fitted out by men high in public affairs; land grants were obtained for considerations paid to the governor; there was nothing, apparently, that had money in it that was not prosper- ed by official connivance. In one instance only is it written that the governor's council “was ashamed to consent” to one of his grants, and that not because of its magnitude, but that it proposed to give his footman a lease for “a little island called Nutten Island,” which had hitherto been “convenient for grazing a few coach horses and cows for the governor's family.” f Sectarianism was the cloak for all kinds of peculation; to write against another at one time that he was a protestant, or at another that he was “ a popish tailor,” or simi- lar epithet, was the stepping stone to official promotion. Indeed it would seem that more modern political partisans have not learned much that is new, or that many who have since held official station have special claim to originality in methods of abusing public trusts. It was when this era of corruption was at his height that the peo- ple of Orange county appear distinctly in the politics of the prov- ince. Governor Bellomont, who succeeded Governor Fletcher in * The old story of carrying the ballot-box around the country originated in this. Un- fortunately for the story there was no ballot-box, the vote of the freeholders being simply registered. t Col. Hist,, iv., 384, 393.46 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. 1698, was clothed with power to correct the abuses which had grown up, for which purpose he was given “ a negative voice in the making and passing of all laws, statutes, and ordinances, and could “ ad- journ, prorogue and dissolve the assembly” whenever he deemed it necessary.* Issuing a warrant for the election of a new assembly, he cautioned the sheriffs, by whom it was to be held, against “ undue elections and returns;” but the latter were themselves creatures of the corrupt combination which had been formed, or, as the record states, “were for the most part men of mean rank” who “had been continued in their places from year to year by Governor Fletcher,” and who, “instead of complying” with their instructions, “carried themselves most unfairly, in so much that one of them made return for a county (viz: Orange county) in which he suffered not any one freeholder to vote.” f Other districts shared in the “corruption of the franchise” to such an extent that when the assembly convened, eleven of the nineteen members of which it was composed, it is said, “sat by controverted elections,” and, having the majority, “estab- lished themselves and brought all things into the greatest confusion.” Finding that nothing could be done with such a body of men, Bello- mont dissolved the assembly, and ordered a new election, taking care that Governor Fletcher’s sheriffs were retired from the management. The result was satisfactory to him; but not to those who were de- feated, who complained to the king, that “the election was appointed to be upon the same day in all places except the two most remote connties, whereby the best freeholders, who had estates in several counties, were deprived of giving their votes at several elections;” that “ the sheriffs performed the business they were appointed for by admitting some for freeholders who were not so, and rejecting others who were really so, as they voted for or against their party, and by nominating and appointing inspectors of the poll who, upon any complaint of unfair dealing gave this general answer: ‘If you are aggrieved, complain to my lord Bellomont,’ and the same practice in all places gives just reason to believe the orders for it came from his excellency.” “To secure a majority of such men as he desired,” continues this remonstrance, “ his lordship, without any instruction from England, added two to the former number, viz: one more to be chosen for the city and county of Albany, and one for the county of Orange, which last is by act of assembly made a part of the county of New York, and has not twenty inhabitants freeholders in it, and never before * Col. Hist., i., 266. f Stanley Handoock appears as sheriff of Orange county at this time. He was also sheriff of New York, 9COLONIAL POLITICS. 47 had a distinct representation in assembly. By this means one Abra- ham Gouverneur, a Dutchman,—so indigent as never to be assessed in the public taxes, and who, as is reasonably to be supposed, had a deed of some land made to him of purpose to qualify him for it, because he never had any land before,—was chosen an assemblyman, and is since made speaker of the house of representatives. This fellow was formerly convicted of murther and pardoned, * and soon after the revolution publicly declared that Jacob Leisler had carried the government of New York by the sword, and had the same right to it as King William had to the crown, having conquered the kingdom of England. At the meeting of the assembly it appeared, of the twen- ty-one representatives there were but seven Englishmen, the remain- der being all Dutch and of the meanest sort, half of whom do not understand English, which can conduce little to the honor of the En- glish interest there.” f Notwithstanding this bitter complaint, the assembly instituted some important reforms. Grants of large tracts of land were set aside, the elections for representatives were regulated, arid provision made for the severe punishment of frauds upon the revenue. Had Bellomont lived, perhaps more general reforms would have been se- cured; but his death, in 1701, was followed, after a short administra- tion under the council, by the appointment of Lord Cornbury, who not only restored the unscrupulous officials that had been removed by Bellomont, but earned for himself the “ unenviable distinction of being the worst of all the governors under the English crown.77 “Rapacious without a parallel, he hesitated not/7 says one of his bi- ographers, “to apply the public money to his own private purposes; and though notoriously vicious, yet he was so intolerant that he sought to establish the Episcopacy at all hazards, imprisoning and prohibiting ministers of other denominations from exercising their functions, without his special license. He was, moreover, as desti- tute of gratitude, as of courtesy, injuring those most from whom he had received the greatest benefits. His manners were as ignoble and undignified as his conduct was base, and when this hopeful scion of royalty wandered about the streets clothed as a woman (which was a common practice with him) the people felt that he had taken,Cali- gula for a model.77 But a better state of affairs was born of the excesses which Corn- bury committed. While at Chear Hall, his country seat in Haver- * Gouverneur was attached to the administration of Governor Leisler, and was tried and condemned, with others, for his participation in the resistance to Governor Slough- ter, during which several of the king’s troops were killed, including Captain MacGrego- rie. He was subsequently pardoned by the king. It is to these facts the text refers. t Col. Hist., iv., 621.48 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. straw, he surrounded himself with such men as Daniel Honan, the freeholders looked upon his extravagance with alarm, and, through the assembly, refused the grants of money which he asked. The rights of the people with regard to taxation, to courts of law, to officers of the crown, were speedily asserted and increased in strength with the political education of the people. When Cornbury was succeeded by Lovelace (1709), the assembly began the contest that was never to cease but with independence. The crown demand- ed a permanent revenue, without appropriation; the assembly would only grant an annual revenue and appropriate it specifically. The power lodged in the governor to dissolve the assembly, was invoked in vain; the people were mainly of* one mind that they bad an “ in- herent right” to legislation, springing “not from any commission or grant from the crown, but from the free choice and election of the people, who ought not, nor justly can, be divested of their property without their consent.” In all the long struggle which followed and which culminated in the war for independence, the representatives of original Orange were found in the interest of freedom, and gave to the final issue its most consistent advocates, its most devoted adherents.LOCA TION—PHYSIOLOGY. 49 CHAPTER IV. LOCATION —PHYSIOLOGY—GEOGRAPHICAL NOMENCLATURE--CLIMATE-- GEOLOGY. HE county of Orange, erected February 23d, 1798, is located between 41° 8' S and 41° 38' N latitude—10' E and 43' W longitude from the city of New York. It is bounded on the south by Rockland county and the state of New Jersey, on the west by the county of Sullivan and the state of Pennsylvania, on the north by the county of Ulster, and on the east by Hudson’s river. It is cen- trally distant 90 miles from Albany, and contains 838 squarje miles. The surface of the county is mountainous upon the south-east and north-west borders, and a rolling upland through the center. The Kittatenny or South mountains extend in several * parallel ranges from the New Jersey line north-east to the Hudson, ending in the rocky and precipitous bluffs known as the Highlands. The Shawan- gunk mountains extend from the Delaware river north-east through the north-west corner of the county. Among the principal ridges are the Warwick, Bellvale, and Rough and Sterling ranges, near the south border of the county, and the Schunemunk range. The extreme north- west corner of the county is occupied by the series of highlands ex- tending from the Delaware river into Sullivan county. The central portion of the county, lying between the mountain systems, is a roll- ing upland, broken in many places by abrupt and isolated hills and the deep valleys of streams. More than one-half of the entire sur- face of the county is susceptible of cultivation, and forms a fine agri- cultural district. > Along the south-west border, extending through several towns and into New Jersey, is a low, flat region, lying upon the streams, and known as the Drowned Lands/ This tract, consist- ing of about 17,000 acres, was originally covered with water and a dense growth of cedars; but a large portion of it has been drained and reclaimed, and now forms one of the finest agricultural portions of the county. On the extreme north-west and forming in part the boundary lineof ±he county, the river Mongaap flows south and unites with the yhxemmmk. Neversink river flows south along the west foot of the Shawangunk mountains, and forms a tributary of the Dela- ware, the latter stream being for a short distance at this point the50 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. boundary line of the state. The Pakadasink or Shawangunk river flows north along the east foot of the Shawangunk mountains and forms a tributary of the Wallkill. The Wallkill or Paltz river flows north through near the center of the county and forms a tributary of the Hudson at Rondout in Ulster county. Murderer’s creek, and its principal tributary the Otterkill, flow east through near the center of the county and discharge their waters into the Hudson. Wawayanda creek flows south into New Jersey, and re-entering the county as Po- cliuck creek, unites with the Wallkill. Ramapo river rises in the south part of the county and flows south into Rockland. A number of small local streams furnish hydraulic power in other parts of the county. The principal lakes are Greenwood, Thompson’s, Mombasha and Orange, which with a series of smaller bodies of water, add pic- tuesqueness to the topography of the county. There are also swamp districts, in addition to the Drowned Lands, of which the Chester meadows have been largely reclaimed and are very productive. MOUNTAINS AND VALLEYS. i The Highlands are the most prominent of the mountain ranges. Approached from the north, to the right of the range stands the an- ciently so-called Butter hill, a title with which Irving embalmed it in his Knickerbocker History. It is now quite generally known as Storm-king, a title bequeathed to it by the poetic fancy of Willis, from the fact that for years it has served as a weather signal to the inhabi- tants of the immediate district. At one time a cap of fog upon its crown indicates the coming of rain; at another, clouds are seen rising over the Shawangunk range, following its course north and south, separating into two parts, the one passing over the Warwick mountains to the Highlands, the other over the hills of Ulster to Marlborough, and both joining as it were over Butter hill, pouring out torrents of rain, not unfrequently accompanied by reverberating peals of thunder such as one rarely hears except in similarly broken mountain ran- ges. The ancient Dutch navigators, no- ticing the latter peculiarity, preserved a record of the apparently culminating point of these peals in the Dunderberg situated further south.. Butter hill has an altitude of 1524 feet. Its ascent from the river front is pre- cipitous; on the north, however, it is crossed by wagon roads.MOUNTAINS AND VALLEYS. 51 Cro’-nest, adjoining Butter hill on the south, is the second peak of the range, rising above, the Hudson 1418 feet. Its modern name pre- serves in substance its Algonquin title, which, in ancient records, is written Navesing, signifying “ a resort for birds.” The name is re- tained in the Sandy Hook highlands and in the Neversink river in Sul- livan and Orange, the latter as well as the Hudson having on its border a Crosiest—its original Navesing. Bear mountain is the third principal elevation, rising 1350 feet above the river. Mount In- dependence forms the back-ground of the plateau at West Point, and is crowned with the crumbling walls of Fort Putnam. Just below, in a gorge in the rocks divi- ding the sites of forts Clin- ton and Mont- gomery, flows Poplopen's kill at the mouth of which the county line leaves the Hudson and from thence VIEW FEOM FORT MONTGOMERY. pUSSCS amidst the hills south-westerly. In successive proximity are the elevations known as Black-rock and Deer hill, Ant hill, Lawyer's hill, Mount Rascal, and Peat, Pine, Cold and Round hills. Following the range we meet Black-top, Black-cup and Long hills, the ancient Dutch Dun- derberg, Torn mountain and Cape hill, Tom Jones' mountain and Hemlock hill. To this may be added as objects of interest by the way: ICidd's Pocket-book, the Lover's Rocking-stone, the Giant's Haunt, the Giant's Slipper, Picnic Rock, Poised Rock, and Erlin's Bluff—a singular mingling of poetic and commonplace titles, and suggestive of paucity in proper orthologic terms.— The Dunderberg and Torn mountain are east of the county line, and, though for- mer •resident's, of Orange, now grace the borders of Rockland. In this enumera- tion they serve the purpose of territorial monuments. The Torn forms the right shoulder of the Ramapo valley; its name and its appearance alike suggest the violence with which it was upheaved or torn from its fellows, although in local accepta- 0452 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. tion “steeple” is understood to explain its title and its resemblance. No mountain range is so well known in Europe, nor is there one with which the history of our own nation is so intimately associated. The visitor at Westminster Abbey reads there the name of Andre; the story of Arnold is sown broadcast through American schools— both point to one center: the Highlands of the Hudson; the one awa- kening regret at the fate of the young and gifted; the other, nerving the hearts of thousands to love of country. Aside from its history, the range has an economic character. It tempers the winds of the sea-board, and bears upon its sheltering breast the fiercest blasts of many storms. Of Storm-king and Cro’-nest it has been well said, by a recent writer: .“They have a charm that might induce a man to live in their shadow for no other purpose than to have them always before him, day and night, to study their ever-changing beauty. For they are never twice alike; the clouds make varying pictures all day long on their wooded sides, and nowhere have we seen more wonder- ful effects of shadow and sunshine. Under the frown of a low thun- der-cloud they take on a grim majesty that makes their black masses strangely threatening and weird; one forgets to measure their height, and their massive, strongly-marked features, by any common stand- ard of every-day measurement, and they seem to overshadow all the scene around them, like the very rulers and controllers of the coming storm. And when the sunlight comes back again, they seem.to have brought it, and to look down with a bright benignity, like giant pro- tectors of the valley below.” The Shawangunk range is less broken than the Highlands. It continues, with but slight breaks, from near Carpenter’s point on the Delaware to the Sullivan and Ulster line,, and forms the boundary line between Deerpark and the towns of Greenville and Mount Hope, those being the only towns of the county touched by the range. The eastern slope is singularly uniform, and is adapted to cultivation to the summit; the western, is broken and precipitous, presenting peaks 1,400 and 1,800 feet above tide. Few inland landscapes are more beautiful than the former. Approached from the east, the eye rests upon fields of grain and grass, upturned furrows, the verdure of waving trees, and the homes of thrifty husbandmen, spread out from, vale to crest, from south to the far north, in unwearying panoramic beauty—a patchwork of gold and green, of brown and gray, of white and red— “ As though all tints - Of gem, of bird, of flower, of cloud, of n until dark, when in the midst of the final melee, “every man made choice of his ovli way.” The loss on the part of Brant was never known. In 1822 the bones of the fallen were gathered from the battle-field and interred at Goshen under a monument inscribe®^ Erected by the inhabitants of Orange county, July 22d, 1822. Sa- cred to the memory, of forty-four of their fellow-citizens who fell at the battle of Minnisink, July 22d, 1779.” No positive identification of the remains could be made. The present monument (see frontispiece) was the gift of the late Dr. M. H. Cash, and was erected by the Boaj:d of Supervisors in 1862.92 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. forces of France, and which disclosed to Sir Henry Clinton the design of General Washington to attack the seat of the British power, New York; and enabled Sir Hemy to take the necessary precautions to prevent the combination by withdrawing from Lord Cornwallis a part of his troops.” The facts are all correctly stated except that Wash- ington designed the dispatches for capture, in expectation that Clinton would do precisely what he did do. When the latter was made aware of Washington’s real intention, the allied army was far on its march to Virginia; before he could correct his blunders Cornwallis was a prisoner, and the success of the Revolution assured. The presence of the continental army in the district, and the estab- lishment in it of Washington’s head-quarters; the treason of Arnold, and the fate of Andre; Wayne’s victory at Stony Point, and his defeat at Bergen; the Newburgh letters, and the refusal of Washington to accept the crown of monarchy; the conflicts and stratagems that were enacted through all the Highland range—have given the county a national record that need not be repeated here. A careful analysis of the question would, it is believed, establish conclusively the fact that, while national independence was decreed at Philadelphia in 1776, the republic had its birth on the camp-ground of the continental army at New Windsor. Seeking, in the early stages of the war, a redress of grievances; laboring subsequently for the success of the declara- tion “that these colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and inde- pendent states,” the question of the permanent form of government was held in abeyance. The first formal expression of sentiment on the subject was the Col. Nicola, letter, and the rejection by Washing- ton of the offered crCwn. But this discussion may well be waived. Fortunate will be the American people if the republic, no matter where inaugurated—whether at Philadelphia amid the clangor of bells on the fourth of July, 1776; or at New Windsor in the chant of the army, “No king but God,” on the nineteenth of April, 1783—shall survive the influences perpetually menacing its overthrow. , In the wars of the republic the people of Orange have borne their full share. Their battles, and those of the rebellion, were mainly fought by volunteers and by the federal army and navy. In that of 1812, however, the militia of the county was ordered out en masse for the defense of New York, but met no enemy there. In records to be given hereafter we shall meet her sons on the ocean and on the field; in the everglades of Florida, and before the embrasured walls of Mexico; on the fratricidal fields of Virginia, and in the memorable march from the Mississippi to the sea.RUINS OF FORT PUTNAM.JUDICIAL HIST OR T. 93 CHAPTER YI. JUDICIAL HISTORY—PUBLIC BUILDINGS-CIVIL ADMINISTRATION—TOWN BOUNDARIES-GENERAL SUMMARY. HPHE judicial history of Orange county properly begins with its -L Court of Common Pleas (1691), the first session of which was held at Orangetown, April 28, 1703.* * * § Prior to that time, and for several years subsequent, in some cases, as has been already stated, its primary settlements were attached to New York or were included in the county of Ulster. The court of Common Pleas was continued until. 1847, -when it gave place to the present County Court. The Supreme Court (also established in 1691), held Circuits in the county after 1703. Its bench was composed of the best legal talent of the province and of the state. Its Circuits were succeeded by the Circuit Courts established by the constitution of 1821, and the latter by the judicial system of 1846, when a new Supreme Court was organized having general jurisdiction of law and equity, and holding at least .two terms annually of the Circuit Court and Court of Oyer and Ter- miner in each county. Surrogate's courts have been held in the county since 1754. The original county was divided into two court districts in 1727, when courts were held at Orangetown and at Goshen alternately, the former being the shire-town. A similar division was made in the present county in 1798, when Goshen was established as the shire-town, and court terms alternated with Newburgh, f This division is still preserved, and is the only practical surviving link be- tween the past and the present; an offspring of the wilderness era vulgarly called “ Half-shire,” clothed in figments of log court houses, dreary forest roads, pioneer jurors and pioneer justice, that flits to and fro in palace cars and is seated beside the judge upon his bench. The court houses of the original county have been referred to.J Part of the walls of the one erected in 1737-40, are now included in the building known as the Orange Hotel, in Goshen. § The one erect- * Ante p. 33, 43. f Ante p. 39, 40. The courts in Newburgh were held in the Academy building, the upper floor having been specially fitted up for the purpose. t Ante p. 44. § The south end wall of the Orange Hotel was the dungeon wall of the first court house.94 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. ed in 1778, was on the site now occupied by the office of the county clerk, the well on the west side of the latter building having stood about ten feet from the rear of the center of the court house. There were two periods in its architecture. As originally constructed its first floor contained a hall in the center, with sheriff’s office and dwelling rooms on the west, a dungeon on the south-east, and a stair- case on the north-east. The court room was at the west end of the second floor, the judges’jbench facing the entrance; on the south-east were cells for minor offenders. The building was plain, and without belfry; its only ornamental features were two windows larger than the others and arched, one over the front door on the north side, its mate directly opposite on the south side, and the date “1773” worked con- spicuously in brick on the east wall in lieu of the British crown-stone which had been obtained for the place, but which Gabriel Wisner de- molished with a hammer.* Here were confined during the Revolution political offenders or Tories, and prisoners of all grades; among others Joshua Hett Smith, who was arrested for complicity in the treason of Arnold, and who presents in his narrative an inside view of the prison at that time. He writes: “ The jail was filled with those who professed to be the king’s friends; tories, and those who were prisoners of war; felons, and characters of all colors and descriptions. I was challenged to know if I had any hand in the business of aiding the tory prisoners to effect their escape from the dungeon. These were a number of persons who were taken in arms while going to join the king’s troops in Canada; they were residents of western settlements where, the country being thinly inhabited, they had no jails, or at least none that were large and strong enough to contain the number of persons who were captured, and who were therefore brought to this place for greater security. Among them were some of the most daring and hardy people, belonging to Colonel Brant and Butler’s corps of whites and Indians. Fifty of these were crowded in a small cell, which had a window grated with strong bars of iron, and a sentinel to watch it.f Notwithstanding his vigilance, however, some implements were conveyed to the prisoners, who, in the night, by gentle degrees, picked away the mortar-from the heavy foundation walls, and, in the course of one night, made an aper- ture large enough to admit a man of almost any size to pass through, which they all did and effected their escape. Fortunately a few days after, several persons came to see me, as well on business as from friendship, and they having interest with the deputy sheriff, persuaded * The tradition is that a controversy arose in regard to the place where the stone should he fixed. Wisner, who was a justice of the peace, asked that it be handed to him and he would place it where no one would object. Holding the stone in the wall, as if to adjust it, he suddenly struck it with a sledge and broke it in fragments. He was subsequently killed in the battle of Minnisink. f The original dungeon of this building.PUBLIC BUILDINGS. 95 him to suffer me to come out of my place of confinement, and sit with them in the open court room.” As evening approached, I took occa- sion to ask to visit my room a moment; but instead of doing so, With its powers en- larged and entering upon a new political era, its future will not be without more marked influence. Aside from the intangible reality of civil administration, the his- tory of the county, as such, is necessarily limited. It has not made roads, constructed bridges, or in any manner controlled or directed the industry or the enterprise of the people; the aggregated char- acter which for a time it enjoyed in the election of representatives by general ticket, has been taken away; county associations, which were the necessity of sparse population, no longer remain, or have only a nominal existence; the county as a county rarely appears. Nevertheless, it has annals which may be summarized: the character- istics of its people, and their products. It may be said of the former that they were peculiarly educated; that the presence among them of some of the purest leaders of the Revolution, the addition to their numbers as permanent residents of many who had served in the con- tinental army, the memory of their own neighbors who had fallen at Fort Montgomery and at Minnisink, and on other battle-fields, had an influence for generations; that anterior to these considerations their fathers in many cases had been large sufferers in the monarchial wars of Europe, and had transmitted that hatred of kingly governments and that appreciation of republics which their experience had taught them. Whatever the cause, it may be assumed, without the dispar- agement of other counties, that they have a marked individuality in their love of country and their sensitiveness to whatever detracts from its reputation or threatens its integrity.GENERAL SUMMARY. 101 Not less than for love of country are they individualized for their intelligence and the encouragement which thQy have extended to educational influences. The early settlers were mainly Christians, and brought with them their Bibles and their religious and secular teachers. Presbyterianism, in some of its classifications, was the con- trolling faith; Episcopalianism, its efficient associate. The Germans from the Palatinate of the Rhine, worshiped in the Lutheran faith at Newburgh in 1109; Presbyterianism was established at Goshen in 1121, and at Bethlehem (Cornwall), in 1130; the Church of England erected the Parish of New Windsor in 1133, and established congre- gations in Newburgh, in Hamptonburgh, and in Montgomery; the Reformed Dutch church was established in the Minnisink capital; Maghaghkemek church was erected perhaps anterior to those already named.* Wherever population centered the foundations of moral influ- ence, through religious worship, were laid. In no county has this influence been more fully sustained,* the census of 1865 returning 115 churches to a population, of 10,000, with a seating capacity of 41,584— a ratio higher than that of the city of New York. In this connection it may be said that in their religious associations the people of the county are remarkably conservative. There are six Baptist churches, two Old-school Baptist, four Friends, forty-four Methodist, thirty-one Presbyterian, fopr United Presbyterian, nine Episcopal, seven Reformed Protestant Dutch, five Roman Catholic,f one Unitarian, and of other modern sects none. The schools of the county have kept pace with its churches, and show the same comparative preponderance; the cir- culation of its newspapers is about one to, every five of its inhabi- tants—a ratio higher than that of Albany, the capital county of the state. To the influences recited it is indebted for the long list of distin- guished men which it has given to the public service; men whose birthplace was under the shadow of its hills or in the valleys of its streams; who were nurtured by its patriotism, its intelligence, its morality; whose lives are an epic of bravery and illustrious actions. Nor yet for these alone: its representatives in jurisprudence, litera- ture, science, and the arts,—where blazing comet bears to unknown realms of space the name of its discoverer, or the hand of man gath- ers up the atmosphere and from day to day reveals its changes; its * In 1712 there wei*e four churches on the Delaware : the Walpack church, in the Wal- pack bend of the river—removed in 1815 ; the Shapenac church, seven miles.above—re- moved prior to 1818; the Minnisink church, twelve miles further on; and eight miles fur- ther up, in the forks of the Delaware and Neversink, the Maghaghkemek church—burned by Brant in 1779, rebuilt, and removed about the time Port Jervis was settled. They were all on the line of the old mine-road. Johannes Casparus Freyenmoet was in charge in 1741. He was a minister of the Reformed Dutch Church. f Several churches have been established since 1865; among others three Catholic,102 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. brighter gems in lowly ranks, whose lessons of virtue are graven on the hearts of its sons— “Pointing to such, well might Cornelia say, When the rich casket shone in bright array, * These are my jewels ! ’ ” Thrift follows perhaps as a natural sequence of the considerations already stated. There are but six counties in the state whose valua- tions are higher, viz: Albany, Kings, New York, Ononadaga, and Westchester; but six whose assessed personal estate exceeds that of Orange, viz: Duchess, Erie, Kings, New York, Rensselaer, and Westchester; and but six whose assessed value of real estate is higher, viz: Albany, Erie, Kings, New York, Onondaga, and West- chester. In other words: throwing out the large centers of popula- tion, the county of Orange is the most wealthy in the state.* Its number of neat cattle (54,886), is only exceeded by six counties; its annual product of butter (2,363,661 lbs), by five counties; its gallons of milk sent to market (8,835,053), by one county; its product of pork (3,615,180 lbs), by five counties. It has $334,146 invested in flouring mills, whose product is only exceeded by ten counties; $900,000 in furnaces for reducing ore, in which it is exceeded by only two coun- ties; $140,000 in cotton mills, whose product is exceeded by only three counties; $255,000 in lumber mills, whose product ($1,336,525) is not exceeded by any county.f And yet the development of the resources of the county is in its infancy ; its reservoirs of water are but partially employed; its lacustrial lands but partially reclaimed; its mineral wealth but partially ascertained. Specialties in the pro- ducts. of the county are the quality of its butter and milk, and its breed of horses. In regard to the manufacture of the former, no special method is employed; its superiority is from the soil and the rain-falls, which develop, peculiar qualities in the grasses. Though celebrated in Europe and in America at an early period, the genuine is now as little known to consumers as are the pure wines of France. Three millions of pounds will scarce supply the city of New York for a single week. Millions of pounds bearing its name but not its * Comparative statistics can be consulted. The following figures, however, are regard- ed as sufficient: Acres Value Value Aggregate imp. land. Real Est. Pers. Est. Valuation. Counties, Population 1870 Albany, 133,108 Duchess, 74,156 Erie, 175,582 Rensselaer, 99,551 Ulster, 84,008 Orange, 78,026 267,034 $38,557,176 361,344 20,927,018 407,302 43,392,351 290,209 21,720,013 253,695 10,788,112 303,858 23,339,358 $7,535,171 $46,092,344 8,225,233 30,132,151 8,155,240 51,538,598 7,796,515 29,516,528 2,364,616 13,152,727 7,575,049 30,914,407 f The statistics of the census of 1875 may vary these figures, but the conclusions drawn from them will not, it is believed, be materially affected. Some of the industries of the county will be decreased, and others enlarged. The product of milk will be increased very largely.TOWN BOUNDARIES. 103 quality are sent to market. Its breed of horses has become familiar throughout civilized countries. In the early period of settlement the Dutch of the Esopus country imported a breed, which was spread through the valley of the Wallkill, and indeed over the entire dis- trict.* Subsequent importations improved it; but it was reserved for the combinations in “ Hambletonian” to produce a progeny whose ex- ploits may well challenge for their sire the position of father of Ameri- can trotters. The perfection of his breed, however, appears only when crossed with American Star,f an Orange county horse whose fame, if less brilliant during his life, is inseparably linked with that of his successor. Of the population of the county 43,991 were born within its limits; 8,891 in other counties of the state; 8,241 in Ireland, and 3,189 in other foreign countries. The eastern states contribute to it 991; the middle states 3,613; the western states 213; and the southern states 234. The county contributes to other counties of the state 15,322, viz: Albany 136, Alleghany 130, Broome 345, Cattaraugus 101, Cayu- ga .323, Chatauqua 140, Chemung 1225, Chenango 101, Clinton 8, Columbia 61, Cortland 163, Delaware 11, Duchess 113, Erie 125, Essex 43, Franklin 2, Fulton 6, Genesee 12, Greene 54, Hamilton 1, Herki- mer 13, Jefferson 21, Kings 1335, Lewis 24, Livingston 94, Madison 31, Monroe 111, Montgomery 28, New York 1954, Niagara 11, Oneida 55, Onondaga 198, Ontario 221, Orleans 59, Oswego 58, Otsego 34, Put- nam 219, Queens 91, Rensselaer 80, Richmond 36, Rockland 605, St. Lawrence 8, Saratoga 48, Schenectady 15, Schuyler 310, Seneca 204, Steuben 511, Suffolk 102, Sullivan 1640, Tioga 152, Tompkins 434, Ulster 1059, Warren 5, Washington 15, Wayne 116, Westchester 402, Wyoming 44, Yates 291. The towns composing the county, whose history we are. now to consider, were given their boundaries under the act of April 3,1801, J These boundaries, and those of the tonws subsequently organized, are given in connection with a brief summary of the facts already presented in regard to prior organization, viz: Blooming-Grove—formed from Cornwall, March 23, 1779. Bounda- ries 1801: “All that part of the county of Orange beginning in the south bounds of the town of New Windsor at the north-east corner of a tract of land commonly called Van Dam’s patent, and then along the east bounds of the said patent to the south-east corner thereof, thence * The facetious Diedrich Knickerbocker says that the Dutch ‘‘quality” of New York bought their switch-tails at Esojdus. The reputation of Esopus horses, however, rests upon the more substantial authority of Smith’s History of New York. t Hambletonian colts from American Star mares are worth $1000 as soon as weaned, No other stock commands so high a price. | Ante p. 40, 41.104 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. south-east until it comes to the top of Schonamonk mountain, thence south-westerly along the top of said mountain to the line commonly called the north-west line,* thence north-west along said line to the division line between the patent of Wawayanda and Chesecocks, thence along the said line to the town of Warwick, thence north- wardly along the line of the towns of Warwick and Goshen to the line of the town of Wallkill, and thence east along the said line and the line of the town of New Windsor to the place of beginning.” Monroe—formed from Cornwall under the name of Chesecocks, March 23, 1799; name changed to Southfields, 1802, and to Monroe, April 6, 1808. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange, beginning in the east line of the town of Warwick, at the southerly corner of the town of Blooming-Grove, and thence southerly along the said line of the town of Warwick to the line of the state of New Jersey, thence along the said line to the county of Rockland, thence aloiig the said county of Rockland to the mouth of Poplopen’s kill on the west side of Hudson’s river, thence a direct line to the south-east corner of the town of Blooming-Grove, and thence- along the same to the place of beginning.” f Cornwall—formed from the precinct of Goshen, as the precinct of New Cornwall, Sept. 20, 1764;J erected as the town of New Corn- wall, March 7, 1788; named changed to Cornwall, March 3, 1797. Boundaries 1801: “ All that part of the said county of Orange bound- ed northerly by New Windsor, westerly by Chesecocks and Blooming- Grove, southerly by Chesecocks and the bounds of the county, and easterly by the middle of Hudson’s river.” Goshen—formed from the precinct of Goshen, Sept. 20,1764; erect- ed as the town of Goshen, March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bounded easterly by Blooming- Grove, northerly by the town of Wallkill, westerly by the middle of the Wallkill, and southerly by the creek commonly called Quaker’s creek from where it falls into the Wallkill on the south-westerly side of the great island in the drowned lands to the road leading across the grist-mill dam of William Thompson esquire, thence along the southerly side of the said road running towards Sugar-loaf mountain to the northerly line of the plantation late of Samuel Rayner deceased, and thence along said line easterly to the south-west cornex; of a large tract of land commonly called Rutgers’ tract, and thence easterly * The line given to the Wawayanda patent. f The board of supervisors, by act of December 1st, 1863, divided the town into three town's: Monroe, Southfield, and Highland. The act was repealed by the Legislature in 1865. In the meantime the towns were organized; their supervisors met with the annual session of the board in 1864. t Ante p. 36. -TOWN BOUNDARIES. 105 along the south bounds of the said tract to the foot of the said Sugar- loaf mountain, and then an east course to the bounds of Blooming- Grove.” Warwick—formed from the precinct of Goshen, March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “ All that part of the said county of Orange bound- ed easterly by Chesecocks and Blooming-Grove, southerly by the state of New Jersey, westerly by the middle of the Wallkill, and northerly by Goshen.” Minnisink—formed from the precinct of Goshen, March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bound- ed easterly by the middle of the Wallkill, southerly by New Jersey, westerly by the Delaware river,* and northerly by the towns of Wall- kill and Deerpark.” ♦ New Windsor—formed from the precinct of Highlands,*j* December 11, 1762; erected as a town March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bounded easterly by the mid- dle of Hudson’s river, southerly by an east and west line from the mouth of Murderer’s creek, and westerly and northerly by a line be- ginning at the west side of Hudson’s river at the mouth of Quassaick creek, and running from thence along the south bounds of a tract of land commonly called German patent and the southerly bounds of a tract of land granted to Alexander Baird and Company to the east bounds of two thousand acres of land granted to Cadwallader Colden, and then across the same to the most northerly corner of the .land granted to Patrick Hume, and thence along the westerly bounds thereof to the lands granted to Patrick McKnight, and then along the same south-easterly and south-westerly to the southerly corner thereof, and then continuing the last mentioned line to the town of Blooming- Grove so as to include the lands formerly of Fletcher Matthews.” Newburgh—formed from the precinct of Highlands, December 11, 1762; erected as a town March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bounded easterly by the middle of Hudson’s river, southerly by New Windsor, westerly by the east bounds of the tract of land granted to Cadwallader Colden, and the east bounds of one thousand acres of land granted to John Johnson, and the east bounds of three thousand acres of land granted to Henry Wileman, and the east bounds of three thousand five hundred acres of land granted to' Rip Wan Dam and others, and northerly by a line beginning on the west side of Hudson’s river at the north-east corner of a tract of land granted to Francis Harrison and Company, called the * The section lying on the Delaware, west of the Shawangunk mountains, was attached to Deerpark by act of Feb. 15,1825. (See Mount Hope.) t Ante p. 36, 37, 38, 39.106 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. five thousand acre tract, and running from thence east to the middle of Hudson’s river, and westerly along the north bounds of the. said tract and the north bounds of another tract granted to the said Francis Harrison to the tract of land commonly called Wallace’s tract, then along the. lines of the same northerly and westerly to the north- easterly bounds of a tract of land granted to Jacobus Kip, John Cruger and others, commonly called Kip and Cruger’s tract, then westerly along the north-easterly and northerly bounds thereof to the north-west corner thereof, and then westerly to the north-east corner of the said tract of three thousand five hundred acres of land granted to Rip Van Dam and others.” Wallkill—formed from the precinct of Wallkill,* March 24, 1772; erected as a town March 7, 1788. Boundaries. 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bounded easterly by New Windsor, f southerly by a west line from the mouth of Murderer’s creek, westerly by Shawangunk kill, and nrotherly by the line commonly called the old north-west line.” Montgomery—formed from the precinct of Wallkill, under the name of the precinct of Hanover, March 24, 1772; name changed to the precinct of Montgomery, 1782; erected as a town March 7, 1788. Boundaries 1801: “All that part of the said county of Orange bound- ed easterly by New Windsor and Newburgh, southerly by the town of Wallkill, westerly by Shawangunk kill, J and northerly by a line beginning at the north-east corner of a tract of three thousand acres of land granted to Henry Wileman, and running thence along the north bounds thereof to the Paltz river, commonly called the Wall- kill, and then southerly up the same river to the south-west corner of a tract of four thousand acres of land granted to Gerardus Beekman and others, and then westerly and northerly along the southerly and westerly bounds thereof to the north-west corner thereof, and then north-westerly along the north bounds of the lands granted to Jeremiah Schuyler and Company to the Shawan- gunk kill aforesaid.” Deerpark—formed from the precinct of Maghaghkemek; subse- quently included in the precinct of Mamakating; § erected as a town April 5, 1798. Boundaries 1801:. “All that part of the said county of Orange beginning on the Shawangunk kill at the south-west corner of the town of; Wallkill, || and running thence along the said kill, being the boundary line of the said town of Wallkill, to the north part of the farm, now or lately occupied by Joseph Wood, junior, * Ante p. 37, 38, 39. £ Now by Crawford. || Now the south-east corner of Mount Hope. f Now by Hampton burgh. § Ante p. 36, 38.TOWN BOUNDARIES. 107 thence west to the river Mongaap, then along the said river Mongaap as it runs to the Delaware river, then along the said river to the town of Minnisink, and thence along the northern boundary of the said town of Minnisink to the place of beginning.” Crawford—formed from the town of Montgomery, March 4, 1823. Boundaries: “All that part of the town of Montgomery, in the county of Orange, lying west of a certain line, beginning on the line between the town of Wallkill, in said county, and t}ie town of Montgomery aforesaid; at the south-west corner of a tract of five thousand acres of land, called the five thousand acre patent; and running thence north-east, on the south-west side of the said five thousand acre patent, to the south-west corner of the tract of ten thousand acres of land, called the ten thousand acre patent; thence northwardly, on the west side of the said ten thousand acre patent, till it strikes the center of a turnpike road leading from the village of Montgomery to the falls of the Never sink river, called the 1 Orange and Ulster branch turnpike road/ thence northwardly, on a direct line to a small bridge, erected across the old stage road leading from the village of Montgomery, in the county of Orange, to the village of Kingston, in the county of Ulster, near the west end of the house now owned and occupied by Adam Dickerson, in the said town of Montgomery; thence north- wardly, from the said bridge on the center of the old stage road, until it intersects the line between the said town of Montgomery, and the town of Shaw an gunk, in the county of Ulster.” The first town meet- ing was held at the house of Edward Schoonmaker. Mount Hope—-formed as the town of Calhoun, from the towns of Wallkill and Deerpark, February 15, 1825;* name changed to Mount Hope, March 14, 1833. Boundaries 1825: All that part of the town of Deerpark lying south-easterly of the before mentioned line (see note), and that part of the town of Wallkill within the following bounds, to wit: beginning at the easterly corner of the town of Deer- park, and at the south-easterly corner of the county of Sullivan, and runs thence due east to the easterly line of the Deerpark patent, * This act is entitled “An act to divide the towns of Wallkill, Minnisink, and Deerpark.” That part relating to Minnisink and Deerpark is as follows: “ That from and after the passage of this act, all that part of the towns of Minnisink and Deerpark, lying westerly and north-westerly of the following lines, to wit: beginning on the line of the town of Deerpark, and the line of the comity of Sullivan, where the west line of the second division of the Minnisink patent crosses the same; thence south-westerly along the said west line, of second division of the Minnisink patent to the old Jersey claim line and south-westerly corner of said division; thence southerly along said Jersey claim line thirty chains; thence south-westerly through the town of Minnisink to the New Jersey state line, to strike or intersect the same one hundred chains from the Delaware river, at Station or Carpenters point, to be a separate town, by the name of Deerpark, and that the first town meeting be held at the house of Cornelius Cuddeback, in said town, on the first Tuesday of March next (1826); and all that part of the town of Minnisink lying south-easterly of said line, to be and remain a separate town, by the name of Min- nisink, and that the first town meeting be held at the house of Gabriel Sayre, in said town,”108 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. thence along said line to the town of Minnisink, thence west to the town of Deerpark, to be a separate town, by the name of Calhoun, and the first town meeting to be held at the house of Joseph Conklin, in said town.” Hamptonburgh—formed from Goshen, Blooming-Grove, New Wind- sor, Montgomery, and Wallkill, April 5, 1830. Boundaries: “Begin- ning at a point where the new north-west line crosses the old county line and runs thence along’ said new north-west line south forty-nine and a quarter degrees east, two hundred and eighty chains to within twenty-five chains of the south-east corner of the Bull’s and Gerard’s patents; then.north sixty and a half degrees east, three hundred and twenty-two chains to aheap of stones in Samuel Brewster’s field; then north seventeen degrees east, thirty-six chains and seventy-five links to the aforesaid old county line; then north sixteen and a half de- grees west, one hundred and ninety chains to the north-westerly corner of the farm of Stephen King, deceased; then north fifty-six and a quarter degrees west, two hundred and thirty chains to the middle of the Wallkill stream; then up the middle of said Wallkill as it runs four hundred and seventy-three chains and fifty links to oppo- site a basswood tree standing on the east branch of said Wallkill stream; then south fifteen and a half* degrees east, ninety-five chains to the aforesaid old county line, and at the corner of the lands of Grant and Derick Smith, Nathaniel Tuthill, and the lands formerly owned by Isaac Germond; then east along said old county line seventy-one chains to the place of beginning.” First town meeting held at the house of Charles Heard on the first Tuesday in April, 1831. Chester—formed from Goshen, Warwick, Blooming-Grove, and Mon- roe, March 22,1845. Boundaries: “ Beginning on the line between the towns of Goshen and Blooming-Grove, near a brook at the intersec- tion of the line of Gromeline’s patent with the aforesaid line, and running thence along said town line north four degrees east twenty- two chains, then south twenty-three degrees west, one hundred and twelve chains to a chestnut tree; then south fifty-five degrees west, three hundred and twenty chains, to the line between the towns of Goshen and Warwick at the creek below Thompson’s mills; thence south twenty-five degrees east, one hundred and ninety-five chains to a heap of stones; thence south forty-seven degrees east, three hun- dred and forty-six chains to the line between the towns of Warwick and Monroe; thence north thirty-two degrees east, one hundred and sixty-six chains to the junction of three roads near the head of Little Long pond; thence north nine degrees east, two hundred and thirty- five chains to four chestnut trees; thence north twenty-one degrees west, two hundred and twenty chains to the place of beginning.”TOWN BOUNDARIES. 109 The first town meeting at the house of Benjamin R. Conklin on the first Tuesday in April, 1845. Wawayand a—formed from Minnisink, by the board of supervisors, November 27, 1849. Boundaries: “All that part of the town of Min- nisink, in the said county of Orange, commencing on the old Ulster county line and in the center of the Wallkill river, also in the line of the town of Wallkill, and runs near due west to the corner of the town of Mount Hope and Wallkill; thence along the same course twenty-four chains and seventy-five links to the center of the highway leading from Ketchum’s mills to Mount Hope village; thence south thirty-seven degrees west, twenty-one chains along the highway; thence south along the same forty and one-half degrees west, twenty- five chains and fifty links; thence south sixty-five chains to an old road near Robert Robertson’s; thence along the same south forty-four degrees west, twenty chains; thence south thirty-five degrees west, fifteen chains and fifty links; thence south forty-three and a half degrees west, sixteen chains and fifty links; thence south fifty-two degrees west, fifty-six chains along the road leading through the Milford neighborhood; thence along said road south sixty-two and one-quarter degrees west, thirty-six chains to Robert Robertson’s, Jr.; thence south forty degrees east, twenty-two chains; thence south six and a half degrees east, thirteen chains to the old Minnisink turnpike; thence across the same south forty-eight and three-quarter degrees east, twenty-two chains; thence south forty-three and three-quarter degrees east, twenty-four chains to William Canfield’s; thence south twenty-seven and three-quarter degrees east, six chains; thence south fifty-eight and a half*, degrees east, thirty-eight chains to the bridge across the branch at Rutger’s kill; thence along the said (branch) stream to its intersection with Rutger’s kill; thence along Rutger’s kill to the Wallkill river, and thence following the same to the place of beginning.” First town meeting at house of DeWitt C. Hallock. Greenville—-formed from Minnisink, by the board of supervisors, December 2,1858. Boundaries: “All that part of the town of Minnis- ink which lies west of a line between the towns of Minnisink and Wawayanda, which is about twelve chains north-west of the dwelling house of Wm. Canfield, said station being twenty-five links north-west of the center of an arched stone bridge across said road to said Can- field’s, and running thence south forty-eight degrees west, four hundred and twenty-eight chains and fifty links to a station on the south line of the town of Minnisink, which station is a black oak tree on the line between the states of New York and New Jersey, on the east side of the highway leading to the village of Salem from the house of John W. Elston.”110 GENERAL HISTORY OF ORANGE COUNTY. Highlands—formed from Cornwall, by the board of supervisors, December 3, 1812. Boundaries: “All that part of the town of Corn- wall tying to the south of a line drawn from Sherwood’s rock, on Hudson’s river, running thence westerly to a house now or recently occupied by William Lancaster; thence in a direct line to the house of William Chatfield; thence to the house of John Odell; thence to the highest peak of Mount Rascal to the line of the town of Monroe.” City of Newburgh—chartered by the legislature as the village of Newburgh, March 25, 1800; as the city of Newburgh, April 22, 1865. Boundaries, 1812: “Beginning at the mouth of Chamber’s creek, on the west side of the Hudson river, and at the north-east corner of the town of New Windsor, and runs thence along the north line of the town of New Windsor to an oak tree on the west slope of Snake hill, and twenty-two chains measured eastwardly along the town line from the east line of the reservoir lot; thence in a straight line through lands of . estates of W. Chapman, G. F. Wisner and others, to the intersection of the Gidneytown creek with the west side of the road leading from the Newburgh and Ellenville plank road to Gidney ave- nue; thence northwardly along said creek to a point due west from the north-west corner of the village of Newburgh; from thence east- wardly to the said north-west corner of the village of Newburgh; and from thence eastwardly along the north line of the village of Newburgh to the west side of the Hudson river; thence due east to the east line of the county of Orange, being the center of said river; thence southerly along the east line of the county of Orange to a point due east from the place of beginning, and from thence to the place of beginning.”NEWBURGH FROM THE NORTHWEST.'ptsrtmrg of ||etoktrg^. CHAPTER VII. THE SECOND PATENTS—THE PALATINE PARISH BY QUASSAICK. NEWBURGH, as its territory appeared in 1609—or so much of it as could be seen from the deck of the Half Moon, is simply described by Hudson, in connection with the adjoining plateau which sweeps in semi-circle from the Hans Kammer to the Highlands, as “a very pleasant place to build a town on.” On the right of his vision Butter hill lifted its rugged sides in sparse and withered verdure in the autumn sunlight; from thence were forests, broken here and there by clearings which the Indians had made in which to cultivate the corn and beans that so largely supplied them with food, or marked by the path of streams, and hills with cedar-crowned summits as now where unnatured by the reclaiming processes of civilization; in the center, a bluff of rolling sand, with gnarled trees and dwarfed shrub- bery, rising abruptly from the water’s edge—perchance the watch-112 HIS TO BY OF NEWBURGH. tower of the untutored Indian guarding the approaches to the altar of Bachtarno, on which the sacrificial fires of his people had burned for ages—Newburgh, untouched by the ----“ Keen ax, that wondrous instrument, That like a fabled talisman transforms Deserts to fields and cities.” The stages of its reclamation and development are revealed in the records. The lands included in the two purchases of Gov. Dongan (1684), and subsequently conveyed by patent to Captain John Evans (1694),* embraced substantially the territory of the present towns of Highlands, Cornwall, New Windsor, Newburgh, Montgomery, and Crawford, the principal part of Wallkill, part of Hamptonburgh, and a large portion of southern Ulster. After the annulling of the patent (1699), the tract was conveyed in small parcels f—one hundred and twelve in number—at different periods from 1703 to 1775, of which ten were included in the precinct of Newburgh, as the precinct was Ofc it *v'(^ ,£ s,*, *- llfkfeA (i constituted in 1772 J viz: No. 1, German patent, 2,190 acres, Decem- ber 18, 1719; No. 2, Alexander Baird and Company, 6,000 acres, Feb- ruary 28,1719: No. 3, Jacobus Kip and Company, 7,000 acres, October 17, 1720; No. 4, Richard Bradley and William Jamison, 1,800 acres, May 27, 1729; No. 5, James Wallace 2,000 acres, January 25, 1732; No. 6, Bradley children 817 acres, March 26, 1739; No. 7, Francis * Ante p. 21, 22. ~ f The largest patent was 10,000 acres. In all cases where patents were issued for over 2,000 acres, it was to a company or association of individuals for the purpose of evading the law, which forbid the grant to one person of a tract exceeding that number. t Ante p. 39.PARISH BY QUASSAICK 113 Harrison and Company, 5,600 acres, July 10, 1714;* No. 8, John Spratt and Company, 1,000 acres, April 12, 1728; No. 9, Melchior Gulch, 300 acres, October 8, 1719; No. 10, Peter Johnson, 300 acres, October 8, 1719. The first in order of settlement were the German patent, covering the present city of Newburgh and a portion of the town of Newburgh lying immediately north*)* including Balmville; and the patents to Melchior Gulch and Peter Johnson near Middlehope. These settle- ments were composed of immigrants from the Palatinate of the Rhine, whose prior history may be briefly stated: The Palatinate was a section of country lying upon the Rhine, in Germany, and now divided and incorporated with Bavaria, the states of Rhenish Prussia, Baden, and Hesse Darmstadt. At an early period in the history of the Reformation, the movement was felt in the Pala- tinate, and the Elector himself became one of its decided friends. His dominions were, consequently, resorted to by the Protestants of other countries who found the fires of persecution too hot for them in their native land. For this reason, as well as from its geographical position, the Palatinate shared largely in the wars of the time of Louis XIY. In 1674, the French army under Turenne entered the district in triumph, and marked its victory with the most barbarous and wanton destruction. From his castle at Manheim the Elector beheld two cities and twenty-five towns in flames. “ Rapine and lust,77 says the histo- rian, “vied with each other in the dreadful destruction committed by the French soldiers.77 Turenne was subsequently forced to retreat from the Palatinate; and the district enjoyed comparative prosperity until 1683, when, by the revocation of the Edict of Nantz, and the flight of many of the persecuted Huguenots to the shelter afforded by the Elector, it became marked for the especial vengeance of Madame de Main tenon, the wife of Louis XIV, acting through the war-secretary Louvois; and the war between France on the one hand, and Austria and Holland, and subsequently Spain, Denmark and Savoy on the other, supplied the opportunity. Made aware of the intention of Austria and Holland to commence hostilities, Louis determined to anticipate their movements and strike the first blow; and for. this purpose he dispatched his son, the Dauphin, at the head of 100,000 men, to invade the Palatinate. The expedition was successful; and several cities had already surrendered to the French arms, when the peremptory order came from Louvois that the Palatinate should be reduced to cinders, and the whole face of the country turned into a * A tract of 300 acres, adjoining the first grant on the north-west, was granted to the same parties July 26,1723. t The German patent occupied the river front for about two miles and three-quarters, (219 chains), and included four lots (700 acres) north of North street. 08114 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH desert. The Dauphin and his officers shrank from the task imposed, but there was no escaping the command, and accordingly they an- nounced to the people that in three days time the work of destruction would commence. Gathering together what little could be collected— unable to turn any property into money—the people fled. Men, women and children, clinging to their homes to the last, were driven to the fields in the heart of winter, while their dwellings were reduced to ashes, their property seized, and their possessions pillaged. More than forty cities and a much larger number of villages were burned; the palaces of the Electors razed to the ground, and their very tombs opened in search of hidden treasure. The officials by whom the order was executed, blushed at the enormities of which they were the agents, and all Europe gazed in horror on the scene. Even Louis was forced to admit the inhumanity of the act, as he reminded Louvois that he had issued an order for the execution of which his sovereign must bear the obloquy. The fugitive Palatines scattered themselves over Europe, and the streets of Protestant cities became filled with men and women once in the enjoyment of plenty, but now reduced to beggary and want. Wherever they went the hand of charity was cheerfully extended to them and efforts made lor the amelioration of their condition. Those who remained around their ruined villages had little opportunity to recover their lost prosperity; the armies of France were frequently traversing the territory, and for several subsequent years the people saw more of war than peace. Learning their condition, the English government, with a view to the colonization of America, was consid- ering the propriety of sending out agents to invite the fugitives thither, when, in the spring of 1708, a company of them arrived there, accompanied by their minister, and made application to be sent to the plantations.* Their request was referred to the commissioners of trade and plantations, who reported: “ They are in number forty-one, viz: ten men, ten women, twenty-one children. They are very neces- sitous and in the utmost want, not having anything at present (but what they get by charity) to subsist themselves. They have been reduced to this miserable condition by the ravages committed by the French in the lower Palatinate, where they lost all they had. They have produced to us several testimonials from the baliffs and principal magistrates in the villages where they dwelt, which we have examined, and find that they give good character of the said minister and the * The larger immigration which followed, Mr. Henry A. Holms assumes, in his pamphlet “ The Palatine Emigration to England,” was induced thither by the agents of the English government. A portion of this subsequent immigration was settled in Ireland, but the larger part was sent to New York and settled in Columbia and Greene counties and in the valley of the Mohawk, from whence a very considerable colony removed to Tulpehocken, Berks county, Pennsylvania.PARISH BY QUASSAICK. 115 others with him. We humbly propose that they be sent to settle upon Hudson’s river, in the province of New York, where they may be useful to this kingdom, particularly in the production of naval stores, and as a protection against the French and their Indians; and that for their further encouragement they be made denizens of this kingdom.” These recommendations were adopted by the council (May 10, 1708), and were followed by an order issued by Queen Anne providing, at her own expense, for their maintenance and their removal to America. Letters of denization were issued to them (Aug. 25t.h), and under a guaranty of 9d. a day per head for twelve months for their support, and a grant of land on which to settle, they sailed for the New World, enrolled as: “The above-mentioned clergyman, Joshua. Kockerthal, Sibylle Charlotte his wife, and Christian Joshua, Benigna Sibylle and Susanna Sibylle, their children; also, Lourentz Schwisser, husbandman, Anna Catharine his wife and Johannes their son; Heinrich Rennau, stocking-maker and husbandman, Johanna his wife, Lourentz and Heinrich, their sons, and Susanna and Maria Johanna Liboschain, sisters-in-law; Andries Volck, husbandman, Anna Catharine his wife, Heironemus, Maria Barbara and Anna Gertrude, their children; Michael Weigand, husbandman, Anna Catharine his wife, Tobias, George and Anna Maria, their children; Jacob Webber, husbandman, Anna Eliza- beth his wife, and Eve Maria and Eve Elizabeth, their children; Johan- nes Jacob Plettel, husbandman, Anna Elizabeth his wife, and Margaret, Anna Sarah, and Catharine, their children; Johannes Fischer, smith and husbandman, Maria Barbara his wife, and Andries his son; Mel- chior Gulch, carpenter and joiner, Anna Catharine his wife, and Hein- rich and Margaret, their children; Isaac Turck, husbandman; Peter Rose, cloth-weaver, and Johanna his wife, Mary Wiernarm, hus- bandwoman, his mother-in-law and Catharine her child; Isaac Feber, husbandman, Catharine his wife, and Abram their son; Daniel Fiere, husbandman, Anna his wife, and Andrew and Johannes, their sons; and Herman Schuneman, clerk.” Reaching New York in ;the winter, they were transferred from thence to the district then known as “ Quassaick creek and Thans- karnir.” * Of their private history we know nothing beyond the fact shown before the commissioners of trade, that they were men of good character; and the general fact that they had been stripped of their possessions by religious persecution; that they were followers * The precise date of their settlement is not known, but it is shown by a petition of William Chambers, of date May 9,1709, for lands immediately south of Quassaick creek, that they were here at that time, the tract which he wished to obtain being described as bounded north “ by the widow Plettel and Quassaick creek.” The widow Plettel’8 friends had evidently erected a cabin for her on lands adjoining the creek on the north. She afterwards married George Lockstead, and the lot on which she had first located was granted to her second husband, herself and her children.116 HIST OUT OF NEWBURGH of the doctrines of Luther and members of the Lutheran church, and were knit together by common memories and a faith that had proved sufficient to sustain them amid the most severe trials and sacrifices. Unlike the pioneers in other localities, they brought nothing with them, and left behind no friends able to assist them. A scanty public stipend, too frequently withheld,, was all that sustained the strong arms and willing hearts before which the dense forest yielded its sway, their humble cabins dotted the hill-side, and a sanctuary in which to worship God arose. Through the petitions which they sent in to the council of New York, and through the records of their church which have been pre- served, we are enabled, to some extent, to trace the progress of their settlement. On the 20th of May, 1709, they write that since the death of Lord Lovelace, the provision for their support had not been complied with; that they were in great want of the same, and without it would not be able to perfect their settlement on the lands assigned them, and that nineteen of their number had changed their religion and turned Pietists, and withdrawn themselves from the Lutheran communion. The council immediately granted them the supplies asked for; and at the same time appointed a committee to examine into the difficulties in their church. The latter were satis- factorily arranged; and at the request of the council, Colonel Thomas Wenham engaged to provide them “a needful and necessary support until the expiration of twelve months.” Soon after this (June 29), their minister, Joshua Kockerthal, asked to be retransported to London, in order to more speedily and satis- factorily arrange what had been done in favor of the company; but his request does not appear to have been granted. In October follow- ing, John Conrad Codweis, in behalf of the company, represented in a petition that a large portion of the allowance granted for its support remained due, and that unless it should be provided, they must perish during the winter. Thereupon the council (Oct. 10) ordered the ad- vance of supplies, the company giving “their .personal security for the repayment thereof in case it be not paid in England in a year.” In other words, the colonial authorities were not disposed to assume the expenditure, trifling though it was, of “ 9d. a day per head ” involved in the agreement which had been made by the home gov- ernment with the immigrants for their support, without definite instruc- tions from the commissioners of trade and plantations. The authority required was soon transmitted to the council, and the payment made, including a special allowance to Joshua Kockerthal of J220 a year. In the spring of 1710, tools and building materials were distributed to them; also smith tools; iron and steel for horse-shoes, nails, andPARISH BY QUASSAICK. Ill mending tools; medicines; books and paper; agricultural implements, and horses, cows, and pigs.* The patent which had been promised to the immigrants for the tract on which they had been located was not immediately granted. On their petition in 1713, Governor Hunter issued to Augustus Gra- ham, surveyor-general of the province, a warrant directing him to “ survey and lay out for the Germans at Quassaick creek, in the county of Ulster, such quantity of land as is by them petitioned for and approved of in council/7 and further requiring that he should “survey for each of them his quantity distinctly.77 A survey was made under this order, on the thirteenth of April, 1714, but was not satisfactory, the immigrants representing in petition that the land being “ all upland,77 they were not able to obtain subsistence for themselves and families “for want of some meadow land for fodder for their cattle in winter.77 So the matter stood until 1718, when Kockerthal, in behalf of himself and associates, recited in petition that the survey had been made, the lands being described as “ a tract on the west side of Iludson7s river, in the county of Ulster, beginning on the north side of Quassaick creek, and extending northerly up the Hudson river on a straight line two hundred and nineteen chains, and into the woods on that side one hundred chains, containing two thousand one hundred and ninety acres;77 which said tract had been “ divided into nine lots, the which are numbered from one to nine, each lot containing a suitable quantity for each family to which they are appropriated, there being allowed for each head fifty acres, and five hundred acres for a Glebe.77 Some changes were asked by the grantees. He desired that the farm assigned to him be added to the north side of the Glebe and the same quantity given to him on the south side. This was granted; but the application to omit from the patents conveyance to “the wives and children77 of the patentees, was not conceded. * “ Joshua Kockerthal—1 barrel of Lime, 3 Gouches, 2 formers, 1 Grindingstone, 1 square, 1 rule, 1 compass, and several pieces more. Hermanus Schuneman—2 Handsaws, 1 great saw, 3 Gouches, 2 Agors, and several pieces more. John Fischer—1 Tenant Saw, 1 Gimlet, 1 Hammer, 1 small file, 1 hatchet, 1 Joynter, besides several pieces more. Michael Weigand—1 great file, 1 smaller ditto, 1 mortising chisel, 1 Joynter, 1 Agor, be- sides several pieces more. Andries Volck—1 Cross Cut Saw, 1 smoodifig plain, 1 wiping saw, another sett of Gouches, besides several pieces more. The widow Plettel—1 wiping saw, 1 great hammer, 1 gimlet, 1 Tenant saw, besides several pieces more. Peter Rose— 1 Glupott, 1 Whimplingpelts, 1 hatchet, 1 little hammer, 2 Agors, 1 Joynter, besides sev- eral pieces more. Jacob Weber—1 box with white lead, Knife and Compass, 1 addz, 2 Gouches, 1 mortising chisel, besides several pieces more. Isaac Turck—1 Glupott, 1 box with white lead, Knife and Compass, 1 saw-file, 3 Gouches, 1 fore plain, besides several pieces more. Lorenz Schwisser—1 grinding stone, 1 square, 1 little gimlet, 2 Agors, 1 smooding plain, besides several pieces more. HenryRennau—1 Cross Cut Saw, 1 Miter- block, 1 addz, 2 Agors, 1 Gimlet, besides several pieces more. The Widow Wiernarm— Another sort of Smooding plain, 1 little file, 1 hatchet, besides several pieces more. Isaac Feber—1 Broad axe, 1 little hatchet, 1 smooding file, 1 rule, 1 former, besides several pieces more. Daniel Fiere—1 Broad axe, 1 square, 1 Miter block, 1 Tenant saw, 1 Joynter, besides several pieces more. Melchior Gulch—Three full setts of Joyner-Tools.”118 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Before the final allotment came some changes also occurred in the original company. Johannes Jacob Plettel died on his passage to America or soon after his arrival, and his widow had married George Lockstead; Joshua Kockerthal had also died; Peter Rose had removed to Pennsylvania and transferred his interest to “ one Burger Meynders, a blacksmith,” for some years previously a resident of Kingston; Lou- rents Schwisser, Isaac Turck, Isaac Feber, Heinrich Rennau, and Daniel Fiere had removed elsewhere, and Christian Henricke and Peter John- son had been added to the company. These changes were recognized by the government, and the patent was issued December 18,1719: “ Lot No. 1, to George Lockstead and Anna Elizabeth his wife, Margaret, Anna Sarah, and Catharine, their children, 250 acres; No. 2, to Michael Weigand and Anna Catharine his wife, Tobias, George, and Anna Maria, their children, 250 acres; No. 3, to Herman Schuneman and Elizabeth his wife, 100 acres; No. 4, to Christian Henricke, 100 acres; No. 5, to Sibylle Charlotte Kockerthal, the widow of Joshua Kockerthal, and to Christian Joshua, Benigna Sibylle, and Susanna Sibylle, their children, 250 acres; No. 6, to Burger Meynders, 100 acres; No. 7, to Jacob Webber and Anna Eliz- abeth his wife, Eve Maria, and Eve Elizabeth, their children, 200 acres; No. 8, to Johannes Fischer and Maria Barbara his wife, 100 acres; No. 9, to Andries Volck and Anna Catharine his wife, George, Hiero- nemus, Maria Barbara, and Anna Gertrude, their children, 300 acres.” To Melchior Gulch and Peter Johnson had previously been issued (Oct. 8, 1719,) patents for three hundred acres each, lying north of the principal tract. Forty acres were reserved for highways,* and GERMAN PATENT. E—Western Avenue; G—Glebe Land; K—King’s Highway. * The roads included in the forty acres reserved for that purpose were what is now known as Western Avenue and Liberty street. Western Avenue formed the northern boundary of lot No. 3, and the southern boundary of lot No. 4, and extended two chains in width from the river to the west bounds of the patent. Liberty street, originally the “ King’s Highway,” was opened by the government prior to the issue of the patent; Western Avenue was not opened until nearly a century later. The settlers made other roads. One ran from the river, from a point in the vicinity of Second street, up the hill in a south-westerly direction along the bed of what is now part of Colden street, to the corner of First; thence to the corner of Grand and Western avenue, and from thence toward Quassaick creek, leaving the Cold Spring on the right. It was first called the “ Wallkill road,” and subsequently “ Wagon street.” It was the principal road to the river. The first dwellings were on the line of Liberty street.PARISE BY QUASSAICK. 119 five hundred acres for a Glebe; and the whole tract was to be known and called “ The Palatine Parish by Quassaick.” The Glebe lot was assigned to Andries Yolck and Jacob Webber, and their successors, for the use and behoof of the Lutheran minister and his successors forever,* for which purpose it was to be leased at a certain quit-rent, in whole or in parcels, for terms not longer than seven years, and was subject to the annual payment to the provincial authorities of “ one pepper-corn,” if the same should be legally demanded.*)* From the church books of the Lutheran congregation of New York, it appears that the successor of Joshua Kockerthal was Justus Fal- conier, who, it is said, was baptized “in the house of one of the trustees, the 19th April, 1710,” and continued to serve the people at Quassaick “every year (i. e. by an annual visit), without any profit of the Glebe. He is deceased, 1723.” In the year 1725, William Christoffer Berkenmeyer arrived at New York, and entered upon the duties of pastor of the Lutheran church there, and also filled the appointment of Falconier at Quassaick. Meanwhile the two trustees of the Glebe, Andries Yolck and Jacob Webber, had sold out their lands and removed to Pennsylvania, and their places had been supplied by Zacharias Hofman and Tobias Weigand, son of Michael Weigand, who, in 1727, entered into a written contract with the consistory of the Lutheran congregation of New York, by the terms of which the congregation at Quassaick were received into the communion of the former body, they consenting “that the Lutheran minister of New York, at his going to and from Albany,” should visit Quassaick parish twice in each year, for which service he should receive the yearly rents and profits of the Glebe. The contract continues as follows: “As we (the trustees named) do herewith call, constitute and appoint Mr. William Christoffer Berken- meyer, Lutheran minister at New York, for our lawful teacher of the parish of Quassaick to minister to us twice a year, as, well in preach- ing the holy scriptures, and the symbolical books of our Lutheran * “ To have and to hold the said Glebe of five hundred acres of the same tract of land and premises unto the aforesaid Andries Yolck and Jacob*Webber, as first trustees during their natural lives and their successors forever. But, to and for the sole and only proper use, benefit and behoof of a Lutheran minister to serve and have the care of the inhabi- tants of the same two thousand one hundred and ninety acres of land, and their succes- sors forever.” f All patents were conditioned upon the annual payment of a quit-rent. This payment was sometimes due in money, and often in wheat or other commodity 1 ‘ Twenty shillings and one fat buck per annum ” was the rent of the Evans patent. The rent of one pepper- corn implied a free grant. The rents of the larger patents produced an annual revenue to the government of considerable amount. After the Revolution the rents became due to the state. In 1786 it was provided that lands subject to these rents might be released on the payment of arrears, and fourteen shillings to every shilling of the annual dues. Many titles in fee were obtained under this commutation; there were also many forfeit- ures and sales. The last sale took place in March, 1826, and all the old rents finally extinguished. The arrears for quit-rents, then amounting to $53,380, were in 1819 taken from the General fund and given in equal proportions to the Literature and School funds.120 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. church, as in administering the holy sacraments of Christ’s institution, promising to pay him the income, &c., and acknowedging him as our teacher, as also whenever he lands upon our shore to receive him, and bring him back on board the vessel. Moreover, since hitherto we can make no use of the bell given to our parish, we therefore give the said bell, by oral permission of his excellency Governor Burnet, to the Lutheran church of New York. However, on this condition, if it should happen that we should be able to build a church of our own at any time hereafter, then the Lutheran church of New York shall restore to us the same bell, such as it now is, or another of equal weight and value. Signed, sealed, &c., March 30, 1727.” Mr. Berk- enmyer served until 1731, receiving thirty cheeples of wheat.* In the year 1733, Michael Christian Knoll was appointed minister at “ Quassaick creek, Weapon’s (Wappinger’s) creek, and Hacken- sack.” He served in the parish of Quassaick three times each year, receiving thirty cheeples of wheat each year. It was during his Queen Anne. The building was without floor or chimney, an aper- ture in the roof, under the cupola, serving the latter purpose. In this building the people worshiped. In their poverty it was their palace; and not less acceptable to the Great Ruler than the costly edifices and gilded spires which men now dedicate to His service. * The agreement quoted appears to have been the result of a misunderstanding between Mr. Berkenmeyer and the Palatines, in 1726, concerning the produce of the Glebe lands, to which he considered himself entitled for his services, ana which for some cause was withheld. Berkenmeyer first laid his complaint before the Governor, expecting him to interfere in his behalf. The Governor, however, declined to act in the matter, and wrote him a letter pointing out his mode of relief, saying that the courts of law were open to him where such cases were disposed of. The difficulty was settled by this contract. administration that the Pala- tines erected the building re- | membered by many of the for- L mer generation as the Glebe > school house, which stood in I the burying ground on Liberty | street. This was their church. The precise date of its erection I can not now be ascertained.— i, It was a building of perhaps i twenty feet square, with a roof THE LUTHERAN CHURCH. \ running up from the four sides. | In the center of the roof a little | cupola was erected in which S hung the bell which had been ‘ loaned to the Lutherans of New York—the prior gift ofPARISH BY QUASSAIGK 121 While these events were transpiring, a considerable change occurred in the population of the settlement. The Palatines were mainly farmers, and in the places of their nativity had occupied lands of the richest and finest soil, and such they sought to obtain in the New World. The sterile hills of Quassaick offered them no such attrac- tion, while those of their number who had found their way to Penn- sylvania had realized their expectations, and pressed their former neighbors to remove thither. Under these influences the majority of them sold their farms. The first sale was by George Lockstead and Michael Weigand, of the whole of lot No. 1, and half of lot No. 2, to Nathan Smith,* from whom the western part of both lots., was pur- phased by William Brown as attorney for Governor William Burnet,*)* and sold by him to Alexander Colden, who subsequently sold to Jona- than Hasbrouck.J The eastern part of lot No. 2, was sold by Michael Weigand to William Brown, for Governor Burnet, and to Burger Meynders. The former sold the southern half of the lot to Alexander Colden, by whom it was conveyed (1753) to Jonathan Hasbrouck. Meynders occupied the north-eastern part of the lot until 1753, when he also sold to Hasbrouck, who thus became the owner of the largest portion of lots No. 1 and No. 2. Lot No. 3, was sold by Herman Schuneman to James Alexander, § from whom it was purchased by Alexander Colden and Burger Meynders, || except two acres at the .north-east corner reserved by Alexander. Meynders subsequently sold to Jonathan Hasbrouck; and Colden cut up a portion of his share into small parcels. Lot No. 4, was sold by Christian Henricke to William Brown, for Governor Burnet, from whom it was purchased by Cadwallader Colden for himself, Jacobus Bruyn, James Alexander, Phineas McIntosh, Daniel Denton, Michael Dunning, and Henry Wile- man, by whom it was divided into lots and was subsequently known as “The Old Town of Newburgh Plot.” Lot No. 5, granted to the widow of Joshua Kockerthal, was sold by her children (1741) to James Smith, who sold one acre in the south-east corner to Alexander -----4------------------;----:- * Nathan Smith was a blacksmith by trade. He removed from Kingston and settled on the patent to William Chambers, (New Windsor), from whence he came to the parish of Quassaick. f “ His Excellency Gov. William Burnet,” is the language of the deed. Gov. Burnet was a son of the distinguished Bishop Burnet. He was governor of the province for a few years prior to 1728. t The eastern part of lot No. 1 descended from Nathan Smith to Henry and Thomas his sons, and was subsequently purchased by James Benwick. § James Alexander was the father of William Alexander, who served as an officer in the war of the Revolution, and who is familiarly known in history as Lord Stirling. He attained considerable distinction in the colony, and was largely interested in lands, not only in what is now Orange county, but in other parts of the State. || Son of the original patentee. IT The reader will not confound this title with that of “ Old Town,” by which the Glebe lands have been known in more modern times. Christian Henricko’s land (lot No. 4,) was that section of the present city of Newburgh lying between First street and Western avenue. It will be referred to hereafter as being the first to bear the name of Newburgh.122 HIS TO BY OF NEWBURGH. Colden; the remainder descended to Benjamin Smith. Lot No. 6, the first one north of the Glebe, was sold by Burger Meynders to Burras Holmes. Lot No. 7, was sold by Jacob Webber to Zacharias Hofman, August 5th, 1724. Lots Nos. 8 and 9, were sold by Johannes Fischer and Andries Volck to Zacharias Hofman, February 20th, 1722.* Hofman held the lots until his death, when they were sold by his heirs. These changes brought the Glebe lands into occupation to some extent by the families of the original settlers or their descendants who had not removed from the place, and by strangers who had rented them; they also brought to the Colden plots a number of immigrants. To the original settlers the new-comers were known as “ the Dutch and English new inhabitants,” terms which may be understood to mean “members of the English and Reformed Dutch churches.” Their acquisition was most favorable to the growth of the place> The association of which Governor Colden was the representative, was influential, and the fact that they had established a township plot on the tract was soon noised abroad. Daniel Denton, so well known in Long Island history, apparently took considerable interest; in the matter and sent to the place his son James, and his neighbor Richard Albertson. Duncan Alexander, the son of James Alexander, was also added to the list of inhabitants; while conspicuous in his efforts to induce settlements on the tract was Alexander Colden, who, in further- ance of the interest which he held, obtained (1743) the charter for the present Newburgh ferry, and at about the same time erected a grist-mill on the Quassaick. From a German settlement the place had passed, in 1743, almost wholly under the control of the Scotch- English, and had been inchoately christened with the Scotch name of Newburgh. Such possibilities as they saw in the “uplands” on which the Palatines had almost starved, to the latter were not vouch- safed, or if they were, they were without the means to secure. The increase in population brought with it also a change in the civil organization of the district. When they were first established on the patent, the Palatines were not given local officers; justices and constables do not appear to have been known to them; the com- mission of crime is not recorded against them: their church was their government. Yet civil authority was made accessible to them, and the hand of the government extended to them in the collection of taxes, as part of the specifically undefined territory of the precinct of the Highlands, which was created for that purpose by an order of the court of sessions of Ulster county, September 5,1710. More definite boundaries and a more limited territory were given to the precinct in * The deeds from Webber and Volck are recorded in the Ulster county records. Webber sold for £110, and Volck and Fischer for £130, “ to be divided between them.”PARISH BY QUASSAIGK 123 1743,* at which time “the parish by Quassaick ” had become a com- paratively important portion of its composition. But to the church of the Palatines the influx of population was disastrous: under its touch this last link of their association was dissolved. Resuming the record, we find that Zacharias Hofman, one of the trustees of the Glebe, died in 1744, and that on the 23d of June in the same year, Burger Meynders, Jr., was elected as his successor and “Tobias Weigand anew confirmed, which was done'in the church there; none of the English and Butch new inhabitants appearing, although they were knowing to our election.” Three years later, on the 22d of July, pursuant to the terms of the patent, a meeting of all the inhabitants of the parish was held ; and the new inhabitants, who were there in force, elected “Mr. Alexander Colden and Mr. Richard Albertson for their trustees,” who took immediate steps to open the church to a minister of the Church of England, one of whom, the Rev. Hezekiah Watkins, was then stationed in the district. The record continues: “ Our (the Lutheran) minister coming there, did preach the 12th of July, without speaking to the new trustees. Sunday the 19th, the church was full of people, taken out of the country from both sides of the river. Some justices of the peace, and some with swords and sticks, were there in the church, in presence of the English minister, Mr. Watkings, who was come there the first time the same Sunday. Our minister, after oral and public protest at the door of the church, went into a private house upon the Glebe, to do divine worship for the Lutherans.f In the year 1748, the 3d July, our minister preached in the church, to which Mr. Albertson did con- sent, because the English minister was not to come there that Sunday; but Mr. Colden did prohibit the church. The 2d October our minister was preaching in the church without speaking with the new trustees.” This appears to have been the last visit made by “ our minister,” Mr. Michael Christian Knoll. In behalf of himself and others, he presented to Governor Clinton a petition, dated May 12, 1749, setting forth the facts of the case substantially as here given, stating further “ that the Lutheran inhabitants living on the said granted lands, being- now reduced to a small number, the present inhabitants have taken occasion to deprive your petitioners of the said church and Glebe; * Ante p. 36, 37, 38. . f The tradition connected with this affair is, that the Lutherans attempted a forcible ejectment of the new inhabitants, but failed. In the melee the door of the church was forced from its hingOs and one bulky Lutheran buried beneath it as it fell. He escaped with a few bruises, and the assailants retreated with most woeful countenances. There is another tradition, that the bell, previously noticed, was taken from its place secretly at night, and hidden in the swamp on the lands lately owned by William r. C. Smith, deceased; in which place it remained for thirty or forty years, when it was acci- dentally discovered, and returned to its proper place. The bell was subsequently placed in the cupola of the Academy, where it remained until 1831 or ’32.124 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. and have lately hindered your petitioner, Michael Christian Knoll, from performing service in it, and forbade the tenants to pay the rents to your said petitioner, pretending that the said Glebe and church have reverted to the crown for want of Lutheran inhabitants to enjoy them* notwithstanding your petitioners do aver, that within a conve- nient distance from the said lands as great a number of Lutheran families are living as are sufficient to make a congregation for divine service at those times when your petitioner, Michael Christian Knoll, by his agreement is called to preach at that place. Your petitioners therefore most humbly pray your excellency to grant to your peti- tioners, the minister and consistory of the Protestant Lutheran Church of New York, letters patent to confirm the said church and five hun- dred acres of land, for the use of a Lutheran minister for the benefit of the said Lutherans in that neighborhood,” &c. Another petition on the same subject was submitted to the Governor, by the same parties, on the 5th of October, 1749, in which it is positively asserted that “ there live as tenants upon the Glebe and thereabout, on*both sides of the river, more than thirty families ” of the Lutheran confession, This paper and the documents accompanying it were read before the council, October 29, and the memorandum in reference to their dispo- sition is: “Read, and council of opinion that nothing can be done in this petition.” In other words, the terms of the charter having been complied with in the election of trustees, the council refused to set the result aside. The decision of the council practically terminated “The Palatine Parish by Quassaick,” the original members of which had long previ- ously removed from it, or had been laid away in its quiet church-yard. As a people, they were earnest, good men and women. Wherever they or their neighbors of subsequent immigrations are met, their record compares favorably with that of the immigrants from any other country. No citizens of more substantial worth are found under the flag of this their native land than their descendants; no braver men were ip the armies of the Revolution than Herkimer and Muhlen- berg. Had they done nothing in the parish but made clearings in its forests and planted fields, they would be entitled to grateful remem- brance; they did more—they gave to it its first church, and its first government ; and in all its subsequent history their descendants have had a part. We close their record with wonder, not that they accomplished so little, but that they accomplished so much. I Mill IIIIM ti 111 III IIIIIPARISH OF NEWBURGH 125 CHAPTER VlII. THE PARISH OF NEWBURGH---SETTLEMENT OF ADJOINING PATENTS---PRECINCT OFFICERS—REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS---THE TOWN OF NEWBURGH----THE GLEBE IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE—THE VILLAGE OF NEWBURGH-—INFIDELITY. , HE affairs of the Palatine or Lutheran church and of the Glebe remained in the position which has been stated until 1751, when Edmund Concklin, Jr., William Ward, Jacob Wandel, James Denton, William Smith, Richard Albertson, Thomas Ward, John Wandel, Caklass Leveridge, Henry Smith, William Mitchell, Alex- ander Colden, Nathan Furman, Daniel Thurston, Michael Demott, and Duncan Alexander, presented a petition to Governor Clinton and council, praying for letters patent conveying to themselves and their successors the Glebe lands, with a view to establish and maintain a minister of the Church of England, and a school-master; with power to divide the Glebe so as to reserve two hundred acres for the use of a minister and school-master, and cut up the remaining three hundred acres into lots of one acre each, which lots* instead of being leased for seven years should be leased forever, the lease-holder paying an annual rent; and also with power to “hold a fair on the said lands on the second Tuesdays in April and October annually.” Notwithstanding the earnest remonstrance of the Lutherans, the governor issued a warrant to William Smith, Esq., “His Majesty’s Attorney-General,” directing him to “ prepare a draft of letters patent to Alexander Colden and Richard Albertson, trustees, &c., for the Glebe land of Quassaick,- in the county of Ulster,” in accordance with the terms of the petition, the lands to be held by the “ said Alexander Colden and Richard Albertson, as first trustees, during their natural lives, and to their successors forever, for the sole use and behoof of a minister of the Church of England as by law established, and a school-master, to have the care of souls and the instruction of the children of the neighboring inhabitants.” This was followed by a legal surrender, on the part of Colden and Albertson, of the lands held by them as trustees under the first126 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. patent; and on the 26th day of March, 1752, the letters patent previ- ously ordered by the governor and council were issued, “ constituting them and their successors one body corporate and politic, in fact and name, by the name of the Parish of Newburgh;” and vesting in them the* lands in question in trust “ for the proper use, benefit and behoof of a minister of the Church of England, as by law established, to have the care of souls of the aforesaid tract of 2190 acres of land, and of a school-master to teach and instruct the children of the afore- said inhabitants, and their successors forever, and to no other use whatever.” The patent further granted to the trustees and their successors “ free and full liberty and license to hold and keep a public fair upon the tract? of 500 acres on the second Tuesdays in April and October in every year forever hereafter, where, as well all the inhabitants of the aforesaid tract of 2190 acres of land, as those in the neighboring settlements and counties, and all other persons what- soever, may buy and sell any horses, sheep and cattle, or any goods, wares and merchandise whatsoever, without paying any toll or other fees for the same.”* The provision for the maintenance of a school-master, and for an annual fair, as well as the denomination of the minister, were new features in the patent. Another new feature was the change effected in the name of the settlement. Under the first patent it had borne, as we have shown, the title of Quassaick; and by this name the place was legally known* until the grant of the new patent, in which it was expressly directed that the settlement should be called “ the Parish of Newburgh.” Previous to the legal application of this name the place had been called Newburgh by the “new inhabitants,” as already stated,f but at what precise period can not now be ascertained. In the petition of Alexander Colden, May 24, 1743, asking for letters patent to establish a ferry, it is said, “ at a place now commonly called Newburgh patent.” In the petition of Colden, Albertson and others, Nov. 4, 1751, it is said: “ at a place called Quassaick, now commonly called Newburgh patent, in Ulster county.” As both of these papers were drawn by Colden, and as the name is not found in any documents prior to 1743, it would seem that to Colden belongs the honor of having conferred the title which the town and the city now bear. The name is of Saxon origin, the word new being the English orthog- * Such fairs are very common in England and Germany. In many of the counties of the province they were established by special enactment of the Assembly at an early period. The fairs were held on the spot above named down to the stormy times of the Revolutiori, were resumed after the war, and were held at different periods as late as 1805, at which time they had degenerated into mere exhibitions of race-horses. The last fair of which any record has been preserved, was held on Tuesday, October 14,1805, when a premium of $200 -was awarded “to the jockey riding the best horse on the course of Benjamin Case.” t “ The Old Town of Newburgh Plot ”—ante p. 121.°F THE GLEBE-7753. A ROUGH MAPPARISH OF NEWBURGH. 127 raphy for the Saxon neow, and burgh is the Saxon burg with the English addition of the letter /*,.* One of the first official acts of the trustees under the new patent was the division of the Glebe into streets and lots, the designating of portions for the minister and school-master, and the repair and seating of the church building. Soon after, a map was prepared showing the location of the streets and lots. This map, indorsed “A Rough Map of the Glebe Land of the Parish of Newburgh,*’ is of interest for reference. The streets laid out on it are confined to the Glebe, with the exception of King street, and are: King, now Lib- erty; Second, now Grand; Hasbrouck, now Montgomery; Water, South, Clinton, Broad, and North. The streets named, however, with the exception of King and South streets, were not opened until a subsequent period.f The Jots were occupied as follows: No. 1, by the church; 2, by three buildings owned by John Morrel and Doct. Morrison; 3, one dwelling by William Ward; 4, one dwelling by Henry Bend; 5, one dwelling unoccupied; 6, one dwelling by Joseph Albertson; 7, two dwellings by Martin Weigand; 25, one dwelling by Henry Don; 29, one dwelling by William Ward; 41, one dwelling by William Ward, Jr. The remaining lots were without buildings and occupied as follows: No. 8, John M. Young; 9 and 10, Patrick McCary; 11, Thomas Waters; 12, 24, 36,48 and 60, Alexander Brower; 13, Samuel Sands; 14, Morrel and Morrison; 15 and 40, William Ward, Jr.; 16 and 39, Joshua Sands; 18, 53, 63 and 65, Joseph AlbertsQn; 19, 31 and 43, Jonas Denton; 20, 32 and 44, Samuel Denton; 21, Isaac Brown; 22, Morris Fowler; 23, Thomas Brown; 26, Charles McCary; 28 and 71, Abel Belknap; 33 and 45, Jonathan Hasbrouck; 34, 35, 46, 47, 58, 59 and 70, Thomas Morrel; 37, Robert Morrison; 38, William Miller; 42, Thomas Ward; 50, 57 and 69, David Connor; 51, Thaddeus Smith; 52 and 64, Jeremiah Ward; 55 and 67, James Tidd; 66, Nathan Smith; 73, Isaac Belknap; 17, 49, 54, 56, 61, 62 and 68, and those west of King street, vacant. The records throw little additional light upon the period between the transfer of the Glebe to Colden and Albertson, and the events * It is reasonable to presume that had the name been conferred by the Germans, in honor of the Elector John William, of the house of Newburg, it would not have been written with the final h. t The marginal notes on this map are as follows : “ Lots Nos. 1 and 27 are reserved for church and church-yards, and No. 72 for a public landing and ship-yard. The owners of the lots below King street are: Capt. Jonathan Hasbrouck, No. 33 and 45 ; Samuel Den- ton, No. 20, 32 and 44; Jonathan Denton, No. 31, 43 and 19; John Morrel and Doct. Morrison, No. 2 and 14: Wm. Ward, Jr., No. 3,15,64 and 76 ; Joseph Albertson, No. 6,18, 53, 63, 65, 67 ; Martin Weigand and others, No. 7 ; Patrick McCary, No. 9 and 10; Alex- ander Brower, No.f 11, 12, 23, 24, 36, 48 and 60 ; Thomas Morrel, No. 10, 22, 34, 46, 50, 59, 35, 47, 70 ; Abel Belknap, No. 71 and 20 ; Isaac Belknap, No. 73. N. B.—South street, Broad street and North street are each two chains wide ; and all the rest each one chain. Each lot contains one acre of land, and is three chains and eighty-three finks in length and two chains and sixty-five links in breadth.”128 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. immediately preceding' the Revolution. The few facts that we have gathered, however, are worthy a passing notice in this history, as they serve to indicate the progress of the parish. It was during this period that the trustees of the Glebe erected a residence for their minister, and a residence and school-house* combined for their school- master. The former was a building about thirty-five feet square, a single story and attic in height, with a rude portico. It stood on the parsonage lot on the west side of what is now Liberty street, just north of Gidney avenue. It was here that Hezekiah Watkins, the first English minister, resi- ded. The building continued to be occupied as a parsonage until after the commencement of the revolutionary war, and subse- quently became a tenant house. The school-master’s house was a building of simi- lar construction, and. stood on the sell ool-master’s lot on west side of Liberty, nearly opposite Clinton street. It had no portico, but was deeper than the parsonage house, the school - room being placed in the rear. In this rudimental col- the school-house. lege Hutchins and Spierin presided, and gave instruction on the old- fashioned rule of Daboll and birch rods; made good scholars .in “ reading, writing and arithmetic,” and graduated at least two gene- rations of worthy members of society. In 1767, John Morrel and Joseph Albertson petitioned Governor Henry Moore for the establishment of more taverns at Newburgh. In this petition it is stated “ that on the Glebe land there are about sev- * It has been supposed that the Glebe school was kept in the old church; but this is a mistake. The church was not used as a school-house until after 1804. THE PARSONAGE.PARISH OF NEWBURGH. 129 enteen dwelling houses,* * * § which are situated at or close by a very public landing place f on Hudson’s river, whither many people from the back parts of the country bring their produce to send it to New York, having at least three boats belonging to the place that constantly go from thence to New York and return back again with goods, which creates a very considerable trade;” that in order to accommodate this trade, it had been thought necessary, for several years previous, “'to permit taverns or public houses to be set up at or near the said landing” for the better “entertainment of the county people; that “until about two years ago,” one of the petitioners had been permitted to set up a tavern and retail liquors, and kept “ a very good and orderly house ” J Notwithstanding these facts, “ one James McClaghry, one of the commissioners for collecting the duty of excise for strong liquors, &c., in the county,” had refused to grant permits to the petitioners; but had “granted a permit only to one Martin Wygant,§ who pays three pounds for the excise, whereas all the re- tailers together in the place when they were permitted did not pay more than two pounds.” The peti- tioners urged the “ absolute neces- sity for at least three or four tav- erns at the said landing place, to accommodate the country people, travelers and passengers;” and that unless so many taverns were licensed, the place would “ become of no account and be deserted by its inhabitants.” The petition bears date February 4th, 1767; and the statements contained in it are certified to by eighty-three persons “inhabitants of the county of Ulster,” whose names show the change in the population of the settlement. What answer was given to this petition does not appear; but as the place has since become of some “account,” it is reasonable to suppose that the prayer of the petitioners was granted, and that the dire calamities predicted, in case of refusal, were thus averted. It is a little amusing to note the language of the inhabitants of this august * The number of dwellings here given establishes the prior date of the map at page 127 t What was afterwards known as Powell’s dock, at the foot of First street, t Joseph Albertson was the person here referred to. His house was on Liberty street, south of Broad. § Martin Weigand’s tavern, represented in the engraving, stood on the north side of Broad street, near Liberty. It was a mere log-cabin with a frame addition. During the encampment at Newburgh, General Wayne had his quarters there. About 1780 Weigand removed to a more commodious building on Liberty street, just north of the burying- ground, and the old tavern was occupied by the father of Gen. John E. Wool, and was the birth place of that officer. Martin Weigand was a grandson of the original settler, Michael Weigand. weigand’s tavern—1767. 09130 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH village of “about seventeen houses,” and their reference to “people from the country.” * * * § We next have, under date of November 17,1769, a petition to Cad- wallader Colden, lieutenant governor, and at that time acting governor of the province, asking for a charter for the Newburgh Mission. This petition is signed by John Sayre, missionary; Chas. Robie, Cad. Col- den, Jr., Samuel Fowler, and Joseph Watkins, vestrymen; and Robert Carscaden, Andrew Graham, and Josiah Gilbert, church wardens; and recites: “that by the pious donations of several persons” the mission was then in possession of sundry tracts of land “now held for the church by deeds of trust only;” and that from “the inconvenience arising from this and sundry other matters ” in which the good of the church was essentially concerned, the petitioners humbly prayed for a royal charter, which was granted. In 1770, April 16, John Sayre, missionary, Samuel Fowler, William Ellison, John Ellison, Stephen Wiggins, Leonard Smith, Samuel Winslow, and Nathan Purdy, petitioned Governor Colden for “a royal charter of incorporation of St. George’s church, in the parish of Newburgh, and county of Ulster,” which was granted./)* Passing from the parish of Newburgh to the adjoining patents, which have been enumerated, J the following facts are of record in regard to their original proprietors and to their sale and settlement: The Baird patent was issued to Alexander Baird, Abraham Van Vlecque, and Hermanus Johnson. It was sold to Governor William Burnet, who through his attorney, William Brown, of Salem, Mass., sold 250 acres to Arthur McKinny, April 24, 1745; 250 acres to Andrew Todd, June 1, 1749; and twenty-six lots, numbered from four to thirty, to Samuel Belknap, December 25, 1749. The latter sold thirteen of the lots to his brother Thomas,§ in 1754; one lot to Mor- * The signatures are: Samuel Falls, Edward Falls, Isaac Hodge, Thomas Orr, Henry Smith, Thomas Smith, Jacob Gillis, Sami. Fowler, John Stilwill, Jas. Demot, Joel Holmes, Isaac Demot, Daniel Denton, John Flewwelling, Abel Flewwelling, Josiah Cone, Daniel Durland, Silas Leonard, Nathl. Conklin, James Denton, John Alston, Burrughs Holmes, Henry Terboss, John Porter, William Harding, Lemuel Conklin, Hendrick Cropsey, Joseph Hallett, Jacob Haiett, John Flewwelling, Mauris Flewwelling, Tunes Dalson, JohnDalson, /Jacob Douchtout, Corneles G-ale, Thomas Hard, John Elsworth, Benjamin Totten, Josha- way Conklin, John Truesdell, Gilbert Purdy, Nathan Purdy, Isaiah Purdy, Joshua Purdy, Leonard Smith, Luff Smith, Anning Smith, Daniel Smith, Gilbert Denton, Pete Ston, John Wier, Hen. A. Gamble, Nathan Purdy, Elijah Carman, Nehemiah Denton, James Tound- send, Isaac Brown, Stephen Albertson, Obadiah Smith, David Wyatt, Hezekiah Wyatt, Thadeus Smith, John Wandle, Isaac Shults, John Carman, William Ward, Robert Morri- son, Mary Wilson, widow, John Fox, Stephen Hooper, John Hallen, John Yangonder, Benjamin Smith, Elnathan Foster, Wm. Booyls, Robert Car Harding, Thos. Morrel, Danl. AcCor, John Bride, Jacob Wandel, Jacob Ansell, Wm. Whitehead, Richard Albertson. f This charter is still preserved in the archives of St. George’s church. It was granted May 2d, 1770. < t Ante p. 112. § Belknap paid £1500 for the lots, and sold one half of them to his brother Thomas for £826. At that time it required ten pounds (old tenor) to make one pound sterling. Belknap paid, therefore, £150 sterling, or $375 (New York standard), for his lots. This rule of computing pounds will apply to all other sales of lands at that time or prior.SETTLEMENT OF PATENTS. 131 gan Powell, in 1761; part of a lot to Josiah Talket, in 1765; part of a lot to Felix McLannen, in 1765; part of a lot to James Stickney, in 1766; four lots to Isaac Belknap, in 1763; four lots to Abel Belknap and four to David Belknap, in 1766. Thomas Belknap sold one lot to Samuel Sprague, in 1761, and part of a lot to Robert Beattie. Beat- tie was also the purchaser of a lot from William Brown in 1769. The Belknaps and the purchasers from them, with the exception of Beattie, were Massachusetts people, and were the first principal colonists of New England who removed hither. For a number of years their settlement was known as Belknap’s ridge, but more recently has been classed as Coldenham from the district post office of that name. The Kipp and Cruger patent was issued to Jacobus Kipp, John Oruger, Philip Gortlandt, David Provost, Oliver Schuyler, and John Schuyler. It included the district east, north and west of Orange lake, and adjoined the Baird patent on the south.* It was the most densely timbered, and the latest in occupation of any of the patents except that to Bradley and Jamison. It was divided into six parts, which were sub-divided into farm lots. Early deeds are not recorded; but tradition affirms that Silas Gardner, with a number of lumbermen, entered the district on the south-east, in 1767, and established the set- tlement known as Gardnert.own. Henry W. Kipp held a very consider- able portion of Jacobus Kipp’s share, and is said to have built, prior to the Revolution, the house now occupied by Jeromus Thorne, and to have called the place “his Rocky Forest.” Nicholas Stevens was a purchaser from him. William Lupton held the Cruger interest, in whose honor Mr. Solomon Birdsall conferred the name of Luptondale. Alexander McCoy was a tenant or settler under him, and Michael Redmond and John Abrams among the earliest purchasers. A colony of Friends from Westchester county, composed of Daniel, Zephaniah and Barak Birdsall, John Sutton, and John Thorne, settled on the patent about 1791. Daniel Birdsall bought the place which McCoy had partially cleared, and found there a log house with a bark roof, which he occupied. Barak Birdsall bought of Henry W. Kipp, and subsequently became the owner of the Nicholas Stevens place. The Birdsalls are still largely represented in the district. The settlement of the Bradley and Jamison patent cannot be traced in early records. It is said that Johannis Snyder and John Crowell were first purchasers there. St. Andrew’s church subsequently held an interest in the patent and sold farms. The Wallace patent-was to James Wallace alone. It was purchas- * Described as beginning “ at three black-oak saplings on the east side of the great pond, seven chains to the northward of the eel fishing place or the beginning of Quassa- ick brook.” * The eel-fishing place must have been a resort of the Indians; it could not have been known to the English at that time.132 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH ed by Joseph Penny, who sold 200 acres to Robert Ross, and settled upon the remainder with his seven sons, John, William, Robison, Joseph, Peter, James and Allen. Penny was from Wales, England. Ross was Scotch, and is said to have been the first settler on the patent and to have established the name of Rossville, although the patent itself became known as “ the Penny patent.” The Bradley patent was to Sarah, Catharine, George, Elizabeth, and Mary Bradley, and was taken in their name by their father, Richard Bradley, who was thus enabled to secure six tracts in sepa- rate locations (of which that in Newburgh was one), embracing 6000 acres. It was purchased and settled in 1768, by John Foster, Wil- liam Foster, Richard Ward, and John Griggs. The Fosters being the most numerous, the settlement was called Fostertown. The Harrison patent was issued to Francis Harrison, Mary Tatham, Thomas Brasire, James Graham, and John Haskell. It was for 5,600 acres, excepting and reserving 300 acres laid out for “ Gillis, the German joiner,” and 300 acres “for the children of or Peter Johnson.” By subsequent transfers James Alexander, John Provost, and Daniel Gomoz* became interested in the patent. It was sold in several par- cels at different periods. The first purchaser was James Ellsworth in 1716, whose lands were held by his widow and after her death sold by his son, William Ellsworth, to Samuel Stratton in 1753; Stratton sold to Jehiel Clark. The share of James Graham passed to Jurie Quick in 1719, who sold to Zacharias Hofman (September 24, 1727). After the death of the latter the tract, as well as the lots held by him in the German patent, were sold by his heirs, among others to Joseph Bloomer in 1754, and Michael Demott and the Dentons and Flewwel- lings in 1764. James Alexander and John Provost sold to Arthur Smith and Jehiel Clark (May 9, 1751,) one half of the fifth part originally held by Haskell. Daniel Gomoz sold to Samuel and Daniel Fowler, November 6, 1747, the remaining half of that part, consist- ing of 500 acres. The extreme northern portion of the patent was held at an early date by Jacobus Van Blarcken, whose interest was purchased by Wolvert Acker at sheriff’s sale in 1772. The Smiths, Clarks, Bloomers, and Fowlers, were English people, and were mainly from Westchester county. Van Blarcken and Acker were also from Westchester, but of Dutch extraction. With the exception of the Belknap colony, none of the settlers had a more controlling influ- ence in the early history of the town than those who occupied the Harrison patent, which, with the reservations above stated, covered the district now known as Middlehope. * Written on the Tax-roll of 1724, “Gomoz, the Jew.” He was a merchant of New York city.PRECINCT ORGANIZATIONS. 133 The Spratt patent was in two parcels—2000 acres in Ulster and 1000 in Newburgh—and was issued to Andries Marschalk and John Spratt, the latter taking the Newburgh tract as his “one-third.” It was purchased by Joseph Gidney, in 1760, and settled by his four sons, Joseph, Daniel, David, and Eleazer, from whom it took the name of Gidneytown. The Gulch patent was to Melchior Gulch, and his wife and children, precisely as were the lots in the German patent. A portion of it passed to John Fowler, and from him to Daniel Kniffin, in 1758; afterwards to Underhill Merritt, and more recently to the late Daniel Merritt. It is recorded as having been issued to Gellis, Gillis or Jellis, Melchior or Melchor, “ the German carpenter, now in his possession and occu- pation.” The portion retained by his family descended to Jacob Gillis, as the name came to be written, who held it by right of primo- geniture until about the commencement of the war of the Revolution. The patent to Peter Johnson* is not of record, but depends for its existence upon the reservations in the Harrison patent. With the Gulch patent, which it adjoined, it was the first occupied land in the north-east part of the town. There is no record of its transfer. The patent for 300 acres to Harrison and Company was to supply a deficiency in the first patent. The increase in population resulting from the settlement of these patents, brought with it a change in the organization of the precinct. The old precinct of the Highlands, after serving the purpose of its creation for fifty years, gave way, in 1762, to the precincts of New- burgh and New Windsor, into which it was divided f—-the latter being constituted substantially as the town now is; while the former embra- ced the towns of Marlborough and Plattekill, in Ulster county, as, well as the present town and city of Newburgh. Under the act establish- ing this division, the first annual meeting for the election of precinct officers was held at the house of Jonathan Hasbrouck (now known as Washington's Head-quarters), in the parish of Newburgh, on the first Tuesday in April, 1763,J when the following officers were chosen, viz: Samuel Sands, clerk; Jonathan Hasbrouck, supervisor; Richard Har- per, John Windfield, and Samuel Wyatt, assessors; Daniel Gedney and Benjamin Woolsey, poor-masters; John McCrary, John Wandel, Burras Holmes, Isaac Fowler, Umphrey Merritt, and Thomas Woolsey, path- masters; and Nathan Purdy and Isaac Fowler, fence-viewers and appraisers of damages. After continuing for ten years, the precinct was again divided, and the Marlborough and Plattekill settlements erected as the precinct of New Marlborough. This division left to * Pjeter Jansen and Nathan Purdy, Jr., Isaac Brown, Jr., Hezekiah Wyatt, Wm. Whitehead, Daniel Goldsmith, Gabriel Travis, Nathaniel Weed, John Weed, Daniel Duboise, Arthur Smith, Isaac Fowler, Stephen Outman, Sami. Stratton, Joseph Carpenter, Daniel Thurstin, John Fowler, Daniel Clark, Isaac Donaldson, Wm. Concklin, Charles Tooker, John Smith, Isaac Fowler, Jr., William Wright, Wm. White, Daniel Kniffen, Rob. Morrison, John Dolson, Leonard Smith, Daniel Purdy, Daniel Purdy, Jr., John Hendrick, ♦Isaac Barton, William Roach, David Horton, Theophilus Mozer, ♦Jonas Totten, Daniel Dorland, Daniel Rounds, John Morrel, Moses Knap, David Wyatt, Samuel Denton, Thomas Orr, Jr., ♦Daniel Gedney, John Elms, Joseph Penny. On the day on which this return was forwarded, the persons whose names are marked in the preceding list with an asterisk, came before the committee and made affidavit of their intention to abide by the measures of the continental congress, being convinced that they had “ no other alternative but to repel force by force, or submit to be slaves;” that they would “discourage the spirit of opposition” which had prevailed, and bear and pay their “ quota of all expenses ” that . might be incurred in the struggle; and that this their declaration was of their “own free will and voluntary consent.” This increased the number of signers to one hundred and ninety-five, and reduced the number who sustained the king and his ministry to thirty-nine. With the return of the signatures, the organization of the “ Com- mittee of Safety and Observation” of the precinct of Newburgh was perfected, and that body installed as its revolutionary government. The history of the revolutionary committees and tribunals of France138 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. has been written; the preceding committees and tribunals of the American Revolution are yet to be assigned the place which is due to them in the annals of the nation. The government of New York differed from that of the New England colonies. The people of the latter, under their several charters, elected their own governors and legislatures; while those of the former had no such power, the gov- ernor being appointed by the king, and the governor’s council com- posed of members of his selection.* In New England, therefore, the revolution could be carried forward without disturbing the existing order of things, while in New York the government had to be set aside, and, as in the case of the nation, a new one created. Pending this change, common law was maintained as far as practicable, while to these committees were assigned the powers inferentially declared in the pledge of association: “The necessity of preventing anarchy and confusion, which attend the dissolution of the powers of govern- ment,” and “ the preservation of peace and good order, and the safety of individuals and property.” At first responsible only to the general committee of the city of New York, the local committees were subse- quently recognized by the provincial convention and its subordinate committee of safety, and invested with the control of the minute men, and all the duties of local revolutionary administration.*)* If not always wise in their action, they were vigorous in the enforcement of order and in promoting the means employed to secure the indepen- dence of the nation.J Scarce had the organization of the committee been perfected when active duties devolved upon it. A portion of those who had refused to sign the pledge, as well as a few who had signed the subsequent affidavit, were guilty of acts which, in its opinion, deserved punish- ment, and which it was determined should be administered. The first instance of this character is reported to the provincial convention of New York in a joint letter from the committees of Newburgh and New Windsor, and read at a session of the committee of safety on the 18th of July. The report is signed by Wolvert Acker and Samuel Brewster, and states that John Morrel, Adam Patrick, and Isaiah * Ante p. 30. f The power to appoint assessors and collectors was given to the local committees, while the county committees were to be “considered as supervisors according to the police of the city, county, town or precinct ” in which they had been chosen, and, with the assessors and collectors, were directed to assess, raise and collect the quotas to be raised for the support of the revolutionary government, and were empowered to enforce collection “by distress upon the goods and chattels of the defaulters, as heretofore prac- tised.”—Pro. Prov. Conv. 15, 18, 131, etc. $ The powers of these committees were very greatly enlarged under the resolution of the continental congress of 1777, directing the state to “ forthwith apprehend and secure all persons who have in their general conduct and conversation, evinced a disposition in- imical to the cause of America ”—a measure deemed necessary, and which explains many of the subsequent, arrests,REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 139 Purdy, were not only “possessed of principles very inimical to the grand cause in which we are embarked, but whose conduct, ever since the commencement of these unhappy times, has been such as to disturb the public tranquility.” * * * § The persons named were arrested and taken to New York under guard, where they were examined by the committee of safety. They admitted many of the charges against them, and were ordered to be confined in the barracks; but were sub- sequently released “ upon their contrition and promise of amendment,” and the Newburgh committee instructed to treat them kindly unless they should commit further unlawful acts. Under date of October 27, 1775, it appears that Stephen Wiggins and David Purdy, being deemed guilty of unlawful acts, were arrested by order of the committee and sent to New York; j* but the final dis- position of their case does not appear. In January, 1776, Samuel Devine J was arrested and confined. He was subsequently released, but for some offense was again arrested in 1777, tried by court martial and sentenced to be hung. He was pardoned “ under the gallows ” by Governor Clinton. Samuel Fowler and Daniel Denton, who were among the signers of the affidavit, were also arrested and confined.§ The Flewwellings were disaffected; and one of them joined Claudius Smith’s band of cow-boys and was hung at Goshen in 1779. Rene- gades were also found among those who had signed the pledge of association,* of whom Silas Gardner, || Benjamin Smith, Elnathan Fos- * “We herewith send you three persons, who not only possess principles very inimical to the grand cause in which we are embarked, but whose conduct, ever since the first of these unhappy times, has been such as to disturb the public tranquility and destroy that unanimity so necessary for the preservation of our liberties. Their names are John Mor- rel, Adam Patrick and Isaiah Purdy. Herewith, gentlemen, you will also receive several depositions taken before John Nicoll, Esq., relative to the matter, which is all we have time to take at present; these we submit to the judgment of the honorable Congress, whether either or all of the persons accused be worthy of confinement or not.”—Archives. t “ This is to certify, that we, the Committee of Safety and Observation for the Precinct of Newburgh, for the apprehension of two persons, viz: Stephen Wiggins and David Purdy, did request and command Capt. Samuel Logan, of the minute company at New Windsor, to assist with eleven of his men in apprehending the said persons, he having ' attended and assisted one day and a half, with himself at the head of the following per- sons, viz: John Robinson, ensign: David Mandevill and John Schofield, sergeants; one corporal; one clerk, and six privates. Capt. Logan’s account, signed by Mr. Acker, our chairman, for the expenses of himself and men, for the time above certified, is just; and for his own and men’s wages, we refer to be calculated by you.”—Archives. t Samuel Devine was arrested on testimony that he had “repeatedly drank damnation to the congress and all the whigs; and furthermore had called the whigs a pack of rebels.” § Aug. 18,1788—Samuel Fowler, arrested as a person of “ equivocal and suspected char- acter ”—refused the oath of allegiance and was confined by the committee. Sept. 4,1778 —Daniel Denton arrested as a person of “equivocal and suspected character”—refused the oath and was confined.—Clinton papers. || Silas Gardner was arrested in April, 1777, charged with “levying war against the United States of America, holding correspondence with and assisting the enemies of the said states.” He appears to have been guilty of correspondence with the enemy and to have associated with others in what has been modernly termed an “underground rail- road ” for passing through the country those who wished to join the British either in Canada or New York. His last act in this line was the safe conduct of the wife of Sir John Johnston to New York, for which service Sir John sent him a ring. He was tried by court martial at Fort Montgomery, and sentenced to be hung; but was pardoned under the gallows and confined, but released on parole in 1778,—Proc. Prov. Conv.140 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ter, David Wyatt, and others were arrested and confined for indefi- nite periods,* and subsequently released on parole. Without pursuing the inquiry, the fact will be recognized that there were in the precinct a number of persons who were known as tories, embracing those, who had consistently maintained their alle- giance to the king and those who, although willing to unite to secure reform on “ constitutional principles,” were opposed to the separation of the colonies from the English government—the latter class spring- ing up after the adoption of the declaration of independence, a meas- ure which brought indeed a sifting time, and threw into the ranks of the king’s friends some of the early* leaders of the original move- ment^ Had they been left to themselves perhaps the great majority of them would have remained neutral, but they were constantly under the spur of association with the officers of the discarded government who required proof of the sincerity of their fidelity to the crown. That they were troublesome and vicious under this influence no one will doubt; that the indignation of their neighbors which was kindled against them was not justified, cannot be conceded. That the whigs committed excesses, or were too hasty and severe in their punish- ments, may have been true in some cases yet the whigs themselves discriminated between their opponents, driving one class from the country, but suffering the other to enjoy their possessions, and their descendants to stand as the peers of their own children in the national temple which they erected. It is not for the present or for future gen- erations to appeal from the justice of that discrimination. The reorganization of the militia of the precinct received the early attention of the committee, and was conducted in conjunction with the general committee of the county of Ulster, for the southern dis- trict of which a new regiment was, constituted (Sept. 2, ltI5), com- posed of the following field officers: Jonathan Hasbrouck, colonel; Johannes Hardenbergh, Jr., lieutenant colonel; Johannes Jansen, Jr.,. * The parties referred to were apprehended and arrested, it is said, while on their way » to join the enemy, and were: James Flewwelling, Elnathan Foster, John Flewwelling, David Wyatt, Solomon Combs, Benjamin Smith, Stephen Wood, John Moffatt, Benjamin Darby, Timothy Wood, Bobert Denton, James Cosman, and Amos Ireland. They were sentenced to confinement in the jail at Kingston.—Proc. Rrov. Conv., 872. t The sentiment expressed by John Alsop, in resigning his seat in the continental con- gress, was shared by a respectable but not numerous class of the community, viz: “As long as a door was left open for a reconciliation with Great Britain, upon honorable terms, I was willing and ready to render my country all the service in my power; but as you have, by that declaration, closed the door of reconciliation, I must beg leave to resign.” j: The late Mr. James Donnelly related the case of George Harding, one of the signers of the affidavit, who visited New York, soon after the English obtained possession of the city, and was detained there three or four weeks. On a report that he had joined the enemy, the committee seized his goods and turned his family into the street. On his return and discovery of the wreck made in his possessions, he resolved to follow the per- petrators of the act with his vengeance; and joining the loyalists, he acted as a spy during the whole war, causing the whigs no little trouble. His course, however, is rar from being justified by the circumstances related.REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 141 and Lewis DuBois, majors; Abraham Schoonmaker, adjutant; and Isaac Belknap,* quartermaster. Two companies were organized for this regiment in Newburg’h, the first commanded by Sami. Clark, and the second by Arthur Smith, f In December following a regiment of minute men was constituted, of which Thomas Palmer, of New- burgh, was colonel; Thomas Johnson, lieutenant colonel; Arthur Parks, of Hanover, and Samuel Logan, of New Windsor, majors; Severyn T. Bruyn, adjutant, and Isaac Belknap, quartermaster. On the 23d of July, 1176, the convention directed the general committee of the county to organize three companies (in all 201 men) of rangers to be employed “as scouting parties to range the woods” and prevent attacks by the Indians, and in such other service as might be required. Of one of these companies Isaac Belknap was appointed captain; J — Schoonmaker, first lieutenant; Petrus Roosa, second lieutenant; and David Clark, corporal. In addition to these regiments and companies, the committee was constantly engaged in promoting enlistments in the state and continental regiments, and in the discharge of their duties found little leisure time. The history of the services of the militia of the precinct cannot now be fully written; but the records preserved, and which have been already quoted, show that they were repeatedly called out § * Through a clerical error, Belknap was not commissioned. The commissions of the other officers bear date October 25,1775. The regiment was included in the fourth brig- ade with other regiments of Ulster and Orange county, under command of Brigadier- general George Clinton. f “Honorable Gentlemen:—Agreeable to your direction of the 9th inst., the Militia Company of the South-east district of Newburgh assembled on the 17th inst., at the house of Col. Jonathan Hasbrouck, and chose by a plurality of voices of the soldiers of said District, the following gentlemen for their Militia Officers: Samuel Clark, Captain; Benjamin Smith, 1st Lieutenant; James Denton, Senr., 2d Lieutenant; Martin Weigand, Ensign. We are, &c. SAMUEL SANDS, } Two of August 22,1775. MOSES HIGBY, \ Committee. “Honorable Gentlemen:—Agreeable to your directions of the 9th inst., the Militia Company of the North District of Newburgh Precinct, assembled on the 26th inst., at the house of Lemuel Concklin, and choose, by a majority of voices of the soldiers be- longing to said District, the following persons for their Militia Officers, viz: Arthur Smith, Captain; Isaac Fowler, Jr., 1st Lieutenant; John Foster, 2d Lieutenant; Daniel Clark, Ensign. We are, &c. MOSES HIGBY, ) Two of August 26, 1775. • JOSEPH COLEMAN, f Committee. t The second company was placed under the command of Capt. Jacob R. DeWitt, the third under Capt. Elias Hasbrouck. They were discharged, March, 1777.—Ante p. 87. § Ante p. 88, 89, etc. How frequently the militia of Newburgh was called out is shown by the following return made of the services of Col. Hasbrouck’s regiment: Dec. 12,1776- Jan. 7,1777 “ 28, “ 66 (C Mch. 7, “ 66 66 July, August, “ October, “ (( 66 Novr. “ April, 1778 —Clinton Papers. -Alarm and service at Ramapo, 300 men 27 days. Fort Montgomery, - 66 _ Peekskill, Fort Montgomery, - 66 Fort Constitution, - Burning of Esopus, New Windsor, West Point, 100 200 150 130 250 460 500 200 460 120 420 14 40 12 90 40 8 8 10 30 45 8142 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. during the war, and rendered important service. Even the aged were not exempt from duty. The provincial convention, in 1718, invited those “ who, in ordinary circumstances, would be exempts,” to form companies to repel invasions and suppress insurrections.* This call was responded to by Martin Weigand, Humphrey Merritt, Sami. Stratton, William Bloomer, Joseph Albertson, William Carscaden, Isaac Fowler, Reuben Holmes, William Ward, Jr., James Denton, Jas. Waugh, and others, and a company—of which Samuel Edmonds was captain; Nathaniel Wyatt, first lieutenant; John Stratton, second lieutenant, and Michael Lewis, ensign—organized and held in readi- ness for service.*)* But it was not merely by their services as militia that the people of Newburgh contributed to the war. A depot for stores, under the charge of Andrew Taylor, deputy quartermaster-general, was estab- lished here in 1777, and was maintained until the peace. Of course it devolved upon the inhabitants of the district, in the absence of regular troops, to collect the various stores needed by the army, and to convey them to distant points. When the tidings of the terrible sufferings at Valley Forge were received, they came forward with every mode of conveyance in their possession, eager to' transport pro- visions, and the extent of their services may be inferred from a letter of Col. Taylor to Gov. Clinton, in which he states that “every sleigh and horse in the neighborhood is completely used up in this duty.” Nor was this all. The inhabitants of Newburgh were subjected to great inconveniences and privations from the fact that the militia of other sections were located here, the place being made a point of rendezvous by general orders,J and the billeting of soldiers on the people was of frequent occurrence. To supply them with food in- volved a heavy tax on the inhabitants, and their own families were often reduced to want by complying with the demands thus made upon their stores. On the reduction of Forts Montgomery and Clinton, in 1777, the people living near the river removed their families and goods into the interior, in accordance with the suggestions of the committee of safety, expecting that the expedition under Vaughan and Wallace would lay waste the village; but in this they were fortunately disap- pointed. The expedition passed by, bestowing no other attention on * During the entire war the exempts were assessed to supply men in their places in the ranks of the militia. t The persons named in the return had previously served in some one of the companies composing Col. Hasbrouck’s regiment .—Clinton Papers. t “Newburgh, Dec.. 18,1775.—Pursuant to the orders of Congress to the Begiment under my command, to be in readiness upon any proper alarm, I have appointed the place of general rendezvous to be at the house of Martin Weigand, in Newburgh Precinct. —Archives IV., 307, 4th Series. J. HASBKOUCK, Col.”REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 143 the settlement than the discharge of a few cannon. What was then the village, was shielded from the passing shot by its position on the hill beyond the range of ship guns, as well as by a dense growth of trees in many places along the river bank, and hence escaped injury from that source. When the fleet returned, a continual cannonade was kept up from its transports, by which one man was killed on the ferry boat;* * * § but the presence of the militia deterred the predatory boat expeditions by which its presence was marked at Kingston. After passing the chevaux-de-frise, one of the frigates was anchored and remained for some time in taking soundings.— The militia meanwhile was posted at Newburgh, New Windsor, and other points in the vicinity, and kept wakeful watch of the enemy’s movements.*)" But the precinct had not passed the ordeal unscourged, although it escaped direct devastation by the enemy. In the defense of the Highland forts many of its men had been killed, and others taken prisoners. They had been summoned from their homes but a single day previous to that of the fatal battle; had left their families, as they had many times before, expecting an early return, but to their homes returned not. How great the anxiety, as the progress of the conflict was watched from the hill-tops—how great the mourning, as the flames which had been lighted on the vessels of war proclaimed the result—we may not know; we only read the expressive record that the poor taxes of the precinct rose from <£50 to £800, and that special donations were collected for “such poor whose husbands or parents were killed or taken prisoners at Fort Montgomery.” J From this brief survey of local revolutionary services and suffer- ing, let us turn to the events of more general interest that cluster around the precincts of Newburgh and New Windsor. W7hen in the spring of 1719, Washington was thrown on the defensive, he concen- trated the continental army in the Highlands and in Smith’s clove, and established his head-quarters in the WHlliam Ellison house on the hill immediately south of the village of New Windsor.§ Here * On the 18th of October, 1777, Gen. James Clinton, writing from his head-quarters at the house of Abel Belknap, says: “Five of the British ships returned this day down the river and fired many shots, but only killed one man on the ferry boat.” f In a letter dated “ Abel Belknap’s, October 23d,” Gen. Clinton writes: “The enemy’s frigate still lies below the chevaux-de-frise, and it was my opinion she was stationed there to prevent our sinking any more; but Gen. Winds informed me yesterday he thought she wanted to get higher up, as she had boats constantly sounding the channel. Gen. Winds’ Brigade consists of about 500 or 600 men, and is still increasing. They are stationed at New Windsor. Capt. Nicolls and his company at the creek. Col. Thurston’s and Col. Woodhull’s Regiments from the County line to Butter Hill, and* thence along the Clove road to Francis Smith’s. Col. McLaughry’s Regiment at Hasbrouck’s Mill, keeping their main guard at Newburgh. Major DuBois with his company from Newburgh along the river North.” $ Precinct records. § The house was removed many years ago.144 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. he concerted measures to counteract the campaign of the'enemy, who by moving on New London and the Connecticut coast, hoped to draw the continental forces in that direction and render the Highland forts an easy prey. Instead of meeting these anticipations, Washington sent Wayne to attack Stony Point, and the decisive action there com- pelled the enemy to abandon the Connecticut expedition and with it the reduction of West Point. Although found to be untenable and hence abandoned, the capture of Stony Point was one of the boldest and most successful strategic movements of the war. Finding that Washington could not be induced to leave West Point defence- less, Sir Henry Clinton organized a campaign against the southern states. Retaining his head-quarters at the Ellison house, Washington remained in comparative idleness. It was the darkest period of the war; without assistance from European powers, the cause of inde- pendence was acknowledged to be hopelessly lost. Ultimately that assistance was secured; France furnished an army and a fleet; Hol- land sent money; confidence revived: the continental forces were recruited and under the drill of Steuben, rivaled in discipline the armies of Europe. Threatening an attack on New York, and thereby obliging Sir Henry Clinton to retain his re-enforcements at that place, Washington changed his plans, and before Sir Henry was aware of it, had moved his forces from New Windsor and was far on the march toward Yorktown. Soon after the successful termination of the siege of Yorktown (October *1, 1781), the main portion of* the American army returned to the Hudson river; and Washington (April, 1182,) made his head- quarters at the Hasbrouck house in Newburgh. For a short time in the autumn of 1182, the army was encamped at Verplanck’s Point, where a junction was effected with the French army, which, until that time had remained in Virginia. Immediately after this junction, the latter marched to Boston, and the. ximerican army crossed the Hudson and went into winter quarters above the Highlands—portions being stationed at New Windsor,* at Fishkill, and in the vicinity of Walden. Generals Knox and Greene were quartered at the house of * October 30,1782.—At reveille, on the 26th inst., the left wing of the army, under the command of General Heath, decamped from Verplanck’s Point and marched to the High- lands; took up our lodgings in the woods, without covering, and were exposed to a heavy rain during the night and day. Thence we crossed the Hudson to West Point, and marched over the mountain called Butter hill; passed the night in the open field, and the next day reached the ground where we are to erect log huts for our winter quarters near New Windsor.—Thacker's Journal, 323. The Rev. Mr. Gano writes in his journal: “ On my return to the army we encamped at Newburgh, and erected some huts, and a place for public worship on the Lord’s day. We , had three services a day and preached in rotation.” The Camp ground at New Windsor can still be distinctly traced by the ruins of the huts occupied by the soldiers. The troops stationed there were the New England line, Yan Cortland’s New York Regiment, and the Maryland and part of the Virginia line. Part of the ground had probably been previously occupied by the New York militia.REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 145 Mr. John Ellison (late Capt. Charles Morton’s), Generals Gates and St. Clair were quartered at the Edmonston house, near Ellison’s; Wayne at the old hotel of Martin Weigand, in Newburgh; and the Baron Steuben at the house of Mr. Samuel Verplanck, in Fishkill.* During the summer of 1783, a portion of the army was in tents on the plain now occupied by the upper streets of the city, and passed through the usual exercises of camp life under the careful drill of Baron Steuben. The army remained in camp here until the 3d of November, when it was formally disbanded. For a long time prior to the breaking up of the army, discontent had prevailed among the soldiers and officers respecting the arrear- ages in their pay. On the 30th October, 1780, congress had passed resolutions granting half-pay for life to the officers, but these resolu- tions stood on the faith of a government with no funds to enable it to perform its engagements; and after their passage, the articles of confederation had been adopted which made the consent of nine states necessary to give validity to any act appropriating public money; and nine states had never been in favor of the half-pay reso- lutions. Under these circumstances, and, considering the very scanty supplies that were furnished to the army, it was quite natural that dis- content should prevail. Complaints were frequently made to Washington, who was fully sensible of the sufferings of his companions in arms, and the most earnest appeals were made by him to congress to satisfy their claim; but congress depended entirely on the states, and thus was powerless to accomplish the end desired. The army now resolved to take the matter into their own hands, and Colonel Nicola, an experienced officer and a gentleman of high character, was selected to communi- cate to Washington their wishes and fears. In May, 1782, Nicola addressed a letter to Washington at Newburgh, in which, after some general remarks on the deplorable condition of the army, and the little hope that their services would be rewarded by congress, he dis- cussed the different forms of government with a view to show that republics were, of all others, the least stable, and the least adapted to secure the rights, freedom and power of individuals—and then made a formal tender to Washington, on behalf of those for whom he acted, of the title of King. “In this case,” says the writer, “it will, 1 believe be uncontroverted, that the same abilities that have led us through difficulties apparently insurmountable by human power, to victory and glory—those qualities that have merited and obtained the * With the exception of the house occupied by General Wayne, these buildings are now standing. It may be of interest to add that the Life-guard of Washington occupied tents where the old malt-house, on Liberty street, now stands. The store-house of the Commissary-general was where the Union Presbyterian church stands. oio146 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH universal esteem and veneration of the army—would be most likely to conduct and direct us in the smoother paths of peace. Some people have so associated the idea of tyranny and monarchy as to find it difficult to separate them. It may, therefore, be requisite to give the head of such a constitution as I propose some title appar- ently more moderate; but, if all other things were once adjusted, I believe strong arguments might be produced for admitting the title of King, which I conceive would be attended with some advantage.” We are aware that it has been denied that this was an offer of the title of king, yet the whole tenor of the letter leads to the opposite conclusion. That it was so regarded by Washington, is evident from his reply, in which he says: “ With a mixture of surprise and aston- ishment, I have read with attention the sentiments you have sub- mitted to my perusal. Be assured, Sir, no occurrence in the course of this war has given me more painful sensations than your information of there being such ideas existing* in the army, as you have expressed, and which I must view with abhorrence and reprehend with severity. For the present the consideration of them will rest in my own bosom, unless some further agitation of the matter shall make a disclosure necessary. I am much at a loss to conceive what part of my conduct could have given encouragement to an address which seems to me big with the greatest mischiefs that can befall my country. If I am not deceived in the knowledge of myself, you could not have found a' person to whom your schemes are more disagreeable. At the same time, in justice to my own feelings, I must add, that no man possesses a more serious wish to see ample justice done to the army than I do; and, as far as my power and influence, in a constitutional way, extend, they shall be employed, to the utmost of my abilities, to effect it, should there be any occasion. Let me conjure you, then, if you have any regard for your country, concern for yourself, or posterity, or respect for me, to banish these thoughts from your mind, and never communicate, as from yourself, or any one else, a sentiment of the like nature.” * This rebuke effectually checked monarchial tendencies, but it did not remove the evils under which the army suffered; on the contrary, the grounds of discontent continued rather to increase. Congress pro- posed to reduce the army, and to discharge many of the officers. Washington, fearing the result of the measure, urged the compensa- tion of the officers and men. “ When I see,” he adds, “such a num- ber of men, goaded by a thousand stings of reflection on the past, and of anticipation on the future, about to be turned into the world, soured by penury, and what they call the ingratitude of the public; involved * Sparks’ Washington, viii., 300, 302.REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 147 in debts, without one farthing of money to carry them home, after having spent the flower of their days, and, many of them, their patri- monies, in establishing the freedom and independence of their country; and having suffered everything which human nature is capable of en- during on this side death; I repeat it, when I reflect on these irritable circumstances, unattended by one thing to sooth their feelings or brighten their prospects, I cannot avoid apprehending that a train of evils will follow of a serious and distressing nature. * * You may rely upon it, the patience and long-suffering of this army are almost exhausted, and there never was so great a spirit of discontent as at this instant.” This letter explains fully the situation and motives of the army, and the power of the restraining influence of Washington. The negotiations for peace were now in the hands of commis- sioners; and, in view of the speedy dissolution of the army, the officers determined upon one more effort to secure that which they claimed as their right. Previous to going into winter quarters (De- cember, 1782), they presented a petition to congress, proposing to accept, instead of the money actually due to them, a commutation of the half-pay stipulated by the resolutions of October, 1780, which, they flattered themselves, would be less objectionable than the half- pay establishment. Some security that the engagements of the government would be complied with, was also requested. But in consequence of the divisions in congress upon other subjects, the important point in this petition—the commutation of the half-pay of the officers—remained undecided in March, when intelligence was received of the signature of the preliminary and final articles of peace between the United States and Great Britain. Soured by their past sufferings, their present wants and their gloomy prospects; and exasperated by the neglect with which they believed themselves to be treated, and by the injustice that they supposed was meditated against them, the ill-temper of the army was almost universal, and seemed to require only a slight breath to cause it to burst forth into a flame. Early in March, a letter was received from the committee in atten- dance upon the session of congress, stating that they had failed to accomplish the object of their mission. On the 10th of the same month, an anonymous paper was circulated, requesting a meeting of the general and field officers at the public building* on the succeeding day; and stating that an officer from each company, and also a dele- gate from the medical staff, would be expected. The object of the * The “public building ” here referred to was sometimes called the “ new building ” and “ the Temple.” The title of “new building ” is understood to have been used to distin- guish it from a building which had been erected in the early part of the war in connection with the barracks of the militia of the district. It was situated on what is now the farm of Mr. William McGill, in New Windsor, and was used for public assemblies.148 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH convention was avowed to be, “to consider the late letter from their representatives in Philadelphia, and what measures (if any), should he adopted to obtain that redress of grievances which they seemed to have solicited in vain.” On the same day an address to the army was circulated, admirably adapted to work on the passions and to excite the most desperate res- olutions. In this paper, the writer reviewed the services of the army —the toils and privations that had been encountered in securing the independence of the states; adverted to the injustice with which the army had been treated, and urged the necessity of some decisive action. “I would advise you, therefore,” he concluded, “to come to some final opinion upon what you can bear, and what you will suffer. If your determination be in any proportion to your wrongs, carry your appeal from the justice to the fears of government. Change the milk and water style of your last memorial—assume a bolder tone— decent, but lively, spirited and determined, and suspect the man who would advise to more moderation and longer forbearance. Let two or three men who can feel as well as write, be appointed to draw up your last remonstrance; for I would no longer give it the sueing, soft, unsuccessful epithet of memorial. Let it be represented, in language that will neither dishonor you by its rudeness, nor betray you by its fears, what has been promised by congress and what has been per- formed—how long and patiently you have suffered—how little you have asked, and how much of that little has been denied. Tell them that, though you were the first, you would wish to be the last to en- counter danger, and though despair itself can never drive you into dishonor, it may drive you from the field; that the wound often irri- tated and never healed, may at length become incurable; and that the slightest mark of indignity from congress now, must operate like the grave and part you forever; that in any political event, the army has its alternative. If peace, that nothing shall separate you from your \arrns but death; if war, that, courting the auspices and inviting the directions of your illustrious lender, you will retire to some unsettled country, smile in your turn, and “mock when their fear cometh on.” But let it represent, also, that should they comply with the request of your late memorial, it would make you more happy and them more re- spectable; that while war should continue, you would follow their standard into the field, and when it came to an end, you would with- draw into the shade of private life, and give the world another sub- ject of wonder and applause; an army victorious over its enemies— victorious over itself.” Persuaded as the officers generally were of the indisposition of the government to remunerate their services, this passionate address madeREVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 149 a profound impression; and nothing seemed wanting but the assem- blage fixed for the succeeding day to produce the most disastrous results. “ Fortunately,” says Marshall, “ the commander-in-chief was in camp; and his characteristic firmness did not forsake him in this crisis. The occasion required that his measures should be firm, but prudent and conciliatory; evincive of his fixed determination to oppose any rash proceedings, but calculated to assuage the irritation which was excited and to restore a confidence in government.” This course he at once adopted; and in the general orders of the next day he noticed the anonymous paper, and expressed the conviction he felt that the good sense of . the officers would guard them against paying any “attention to such an/irregular invitation;” but his own duty, he conceived, “ as well as the reputation and true interests of the army required his disapprobation of such disorderly proceedings. At the same time, he requested the general and field officers, with one officer from each company, and a proper representation from the staff of the army, to assemble at twelve o’clock, on Saturday the 15th October, at the new building, to hear the report of the committee deputed by the army to Congress. After mature deliberation, they will devise what further measures ought to be adopted as most rational and best calcu- lated to attain the just and important object in view.” These orders changed the whole aspect of affairs, and the meeting called by the anonymous writer was not held. By a master-policy, Washington had placed himself, as it were, at the head of the move- ment for redress, and had appointed in regular form a time and place of meeting. On the day succeeding the publication of these orders, a second anonymous address made its appearance, from the same pen which had written the former, in which the writer affected to consider, the orders in a light favorable to his views. “Until now,” said he, “the commander-in-chief has regarded the steps you have taken.for redress with good wishes alone; his ostensible silence has authorized your meetings, and his private opinion has sanctioned your claims. Had he disliked the object in view, would not the same sense of duty which forbade you from meeting on the third day of the week, have forbidden you from meeting on the seventh ?” * On the 15t.h, the convention of officers assembled at the new * The writer of these letters was Major John Armstrong, at that time a young man of twenty-six, and aid-de-camp to Major General Gates. Some years after the letters were written, Armstrong acknowledged their authorship; but insisted that they were written “ at the solicitation of friends, as the chosen organ to express the sentiments of the officers of the army, and were only an honest and manly though perhaps an indiscreet endeavor to support public credit, and do justice to a patient, long-suffering and gallant army.” Although entertaining a different opinion at the time the letters appeared, Washington, in 1797, writes: “ I have since had sufficient reason for believing, that the object of the author was just, honorable and friendly to our country, though the means suggested by him were certainly liable to much misunderstanding and abuse.”—Sparks’ Life of Washington.150 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. building, and General Gates took the chair. There was a full atten- dance of officers; and defcp solemnity pervaded the assembly as the commander-in-chief stepped upon the platform to read an address that he had prepared for the occasion. Amid the most profound attention Washington commenced reading: “Gentlemen: By an anonymous summons, an attempt has been made to convene you together. How inconsistent with the rules of propriety, how unmilitary, and how subversive of all order and discipline, let the good sense of the army decide.” Pausing for a moment, he drew out his spectacles, carefully wiped and adjusted them, and while doing so remarked: “These eyes, my friends, have grown dim, and these locks white in the service; yet I have never doubted the justice of my country.” * The effect, was electrical. The whole scene, when we consider the time, the place, the man, the object of the convention, was hardly surpassed in in- terest by any other event of those eventful days. Resuming his address, Washington exhibited the anonymous letters as “designed to answer the most insidious purposes,” while their ostensible object was simply to secure the redress of grievances. He then noticed more particularly the remedies proposed in the letters for the assumed injustice of congress. The alternative presented, said "he, of “either deserting our country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our arms against it, which is the apparent object, unless congress can be compelled into instant compliance, has something so shocking in it, that humanity revolts at the idea. My God! what can this writer have in view, by recommending such measures? can he be a friend of the army ? can he be a friend to his country ? rather is he not the insidious foe plotting the ruin of both, by sowing the seeds of discord and separation between the civil and military powers of the continent.” He then explained what appeared to him to be the causes of delay in the action of congress—pledged himself to exert whatever abilities he possessed in order to obtain the demands of the army; and assured them that, previous to their dissolution as an army, congress would cause all their accounts to be fairly liquidated, and that they would “adopt the most effectual measures in their power” to render ample justice to the army “ for its faithful and meritorious services.” Concluding with a direct appeal to those present, he exclaimed: “ Let me conjure you in the name of our common country, as you respect the rights of humanity; and as you regard the military and national character of America; to express your utmost horror and detestation of the man who wishes, under any specious pretences, to overturn the liberties of our country; and who wickedly attempts to * Am. Biol, Die. 827. Irving’s Washington, iv.liE VOL UTIONAR Y EVENTS. 151 open the flood-gates of civil discord, and deluge our rising empire in blood. By thus determining and acting, you will pursue the plain and direct road to the attainment of your wishes; you will defeat the insidious designs of our enemies, who are compelled to resort from open force to secret artifice; you will give one more distinguished proof of unexampled patriotism and patient virtue, rising superior to the pressure of the most complicated sufferings; and you will, by the dignity of your conduct, afford occasion for posterity to say, when speaking of the glorious example you have exhibited to mankind— had this day been wanting the world had never seen the last stage of per- fection that human nature is capable of attaining/” These sentiments, says Marshall, from a person whom they had been accustomed to love, to reverence, and to obey; the solidity of whose judgment, and the sincerity of whose zeal for their interests were alike unquestioned, could not fail to be irresistible. No sooner had the commander-in-chief withdrawn from the room, than General Knox moved, and General Putnam seconded, a resolution tendering the thanks of the convention to “His Excellency, and assuring him that the officers reciprocated his affectionate expressions with the greatest sincerity of which the human heart is capable.” This reso- lution was unanimously voted; and, on motion of General Putnam, a committee, consisting of General Knox, Colonel Brooks, and Captain Howard, was appointed to prepare resolutions on the business before the convention, and report in half an hour. The committee, after consultation, reported a series of resolutions which were passed unanimously. These resolutions expressed un- shaken confidence in the justice of congress; and that the represen- tatives of America would “not disband or disperse the army until their accounts” were “liquidated, the balances accurately ascertained, and adequate funds established for payment;” and that in this arrange- ment the officers expected “that the half-pay, or commutation for it, should be efficaciously comprehended.” It was further resolved, “ that the officers of the American army view with abhorrence and reject with disdain the infamous propositions contained in a late anonymous address to the officers of the army, and resent with indig- nation the secret attempts of some unknown persons to collect the officers together, in a manner totally subversive of all discipline and good order.” The triumph of right was complete. The storm which had threat- ened to overwhelm the infant Republic, was hushed. Washington immediately enclosed to the president of congress the proceedings, accompanied by a letter in which he again urged prompt attention to the subject. Not only did he assume the entire justice of the claims.152 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. of the army; but, for the first time in his history, he asked a personal favor of congress. “Having,” he wrote, “from motives of justice, duty, and gratitude, spontaneously offered myself as an advocate for their rights, it now only remains for me to perform the task I have assumed, and to intercede in their behalf, as T now do, that the sov- ereign power will be pleased to verify the predictions I have pro- nounced of, and the confidence the army have reposed in, the justice of their country.” Immediately on the reception of Washington’s dispatches, congress passed, with the concurrence of* nine states, the resolution commuting the half-pay of the officers into a sum in gross equal to five years full pay; and the result was received by the army with great satisfaction. Meanwhile the peace commissioners had concluded their labors, so far as arranging the articles between Great Britain and the United States was concerned; but the exchange of ratifications was contin- gent upon a similar exchange between the contending European powers. It was feared for some time that the obstacles to a general pacification would not be overcome. These fears, however, were entirely dispelled by a letter from La Fayette, in March, announcing a general peace. In April, official notification was received of the exchange of preliminary articles, and the cessation of hostilities; and the commander-in-chief announced the joyful intelligence to the army in his orders of April 18th. “The commander-in-chief,” reads this interesting paper, “orders the cessation of hostilities, between the United States of America and the King of Great. Britain, to be pub- licly proclaimed at the new building, to-morrow at twelve o’clock; and that the proclamation which will be communicated herewith, be read to-morrow evening at the head of every regiment and corps of the army; after which the chaplains, with the several brigades, will render thanks to Almighty God for all his mercies, particularly for his over-ruling the wrath of man to his own glory, and causing the rage of war to cease among the nations.” Although the proclamation referred to extended only to the cessa- tion of hostilities, yet it was regarded as the sure precursor of an event to the accomplishment of which had been devoted the toils and sufferings of a long and doubtful contest; and as the morning sun of the 19th tinged the mountain tops it was hailed with reverberating peals of rejoicing. In this feeling Washington joined. “The com- mander-in-chief” continues the orders, “far from endeavoring to stifle the feelings of joy in his own bosom, offers his most cordial congrat- ulations on the occasion, to all the officers of every denomination, to all the troops of the United States in general, and in particular to those gallant and deserving men who have resolved to defend theREVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 153 rights of their invaded country so long as the war should continue; for these are the men who ought to be considered as the pride and boast of the American army, and who, crowned with well-earned laurels, ma}^ soon withdraw from the field of glory to the more tran- quil walks of civil life. While the General recollects the almost infinite variety of scenes through which we have passed with a mixture of pleasure, astonishment and gratitude—while he contem- plates the prospect before him with rapture—he cannot help wishing that all the brave men, of whatever condition they may be, who have shared in the toils and dangers of affecting this glorious revolution, of rescuing millions from the hand of oppression, and of laying the foundation of a great empire, might be impressed with a proper idea of the dignified part they have been called to act, under the smiles of Providence, on the stage of human affairs; for happy, thrice happy, shall they be pronounced hereafter, who have contributed anything, w’ho have performed the meanest office in erecting this stupendous fabric of Freedom and Empire, on the broad basis of independency; who have assisted in protecting the rights of human nature, and establishing an asylum for the poor and oppressed of all nations and religions.” * * “ The adjutant-general will have such working parties detailed to assist in the preparations for a general rejoicing as the chief engineer, with the army, shall call for; and the quarter- master-general will also furnish such materials as he may want.” The details of the “general rejoicing” at Newburgh, New Wind- sor, and other points of encampment, on the 19th of April, 1783, have not been preserved. The order of Washington, and the notes by Thacher and Heath,* indicate, however, that it was conducted with the most imposing military and civil ceremonies; that, as had been done on a former occasion,*)* the army lined the banks on both sides of the river, with burnished arms and proudly floating banners, and, at a given signal, paused and presented arms. The pealing of thirteen guns from West Point now awoke the echoes of the hills, and was fol- lowed by &feu dejoie which rolled along the lines from West Point to the utmost limits of the camp. The “ thrilling fife-note and drums heart-kindling beat,” then called the hosts of freedom to the assembly, * April 19,1783. At noon the proclamation of congress for the cessation of hostilities was proclaimed at the door of the new building, followed by three huzzas; after which a Ser was made by the Rev. Mr. Gano, and an anthem (Independence, from Billings,) was )rmed by vocal and instrumental music.”—Heath's Memoirs, 371. “April 19,1783. On the completion of eight years from the memorable battle of Lex- ington, the proclamation of congress for a cessation of hostilities was published at the door of the public building, followed by three huzzas; after which a prayer was offered to the Almighty Ruler of the world, by the Rev. Mr. Gano, and an anthem was performed by voices and instruments.”—Thacker's Journal, 343. t The celebration of the birth of the Dauphin. Tradition affirms that- the army exerci- ses were the same on both occasions.154 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. where patriot knees bent low in prayer with Chaplain Gano; and at its conclusion, voices and instruments joined in Billings* anthem: May His blessing descend, World without end, On every part of this continent. ■ May harmony and peace Begin and never cease, And may the strength increase Of the continent.. May American wilds Be filled with His smiles, And may the nations bow To our royal King. May Rome, France, and Spain, And all the world proclaim,. The glory and the fame, Of onr royal King. God is the king. Amen. The Lord is His name. Amen. Loud, loudly sing, That God is the King! May His reign be glorious ; America victorious; And may the earth acknowledge God is the King! Amen. Amen. Amen.” * These services concluded, the army returned to quarters and united in festivities suited to the occasion. As the day closed, the signal guns from West Point again called the soldiers to arms, and the feu dejoie again rang along the line. This was three times repeated, accompanied by the discharge of cannon, “ and the mountain sides resounded and echoed like tremendous peals of thunder, and the flashing from thousands of fire-arms in the darkness of evening was like unto vivid flashings of lightning from the clouds.** Then the beacons on the hill-tops, no longer the harbingers of danger, lighted up the gloom and rolled the tidings of peace on through New England and shed their radiance on the blood-stained field of Lexington. Released in a great measure from the cares and anxieties which had so long pressed heavily upon the commander-in-chief and the army, the discipline of the camp was relaxed; officers and men desir- ing them were granted furloughs, while the facilities for social inter- course were improved to the fullest extent by those who remained in camp. Entertainments were given by all the principal officers; at head-quarters Mrs. Washington was surrounded by all the court of the camp. In the reception and dining hall, a dinner and supper were daily served as plentiful as the country could supply and as * The music of this anthem is to be*found in the “Singing Master’s Assistant,” by Wil- liam Billings. Boston: 1778. The words were kindly sent to the editor of this work by Dr. Lowell Mason a short time before his death. “ The States, O Lord, with songs of praise Shall in Thy strength rejoice, And blest with Thy salvation raise To Heaven their cheerful voice. To the King they shall sing: Halleluiah! Thy goodness and Thy tender care Have all our foes destroyed; A covenant of peace Thou mad’stwithus, Confirmed by Thy word; A covenant Thou mad’st with us, And sealed it with Thy blood. To the King they shall sing: Halleluiah! And all the continent shall sing: Down with this earthly king! No king but God! To the King they shall sing: Halleluiah! And the continent shall sing: God is our rightful king! Halleluiah! And the continent shall sing : God is our gracious king 1 Halleluiah! They shall sing to the King : Halleluiah! Let us sing to the King : Halleluiah! God is the king! Amen. The Lord is His name! Amen.REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 155 good as could be made by continental cooks. The repast ended, French wines for our French allies and those who affected their tastes, and more substantial Madeira for Americans of the old school, circu- lated freely, and were served with little silver mugs or goblets, made in France for Washington's camp equipage. In the summertime, the' guests soon withdrew from the table to the open grounds; but in the autumn, the long evenings were frequently passed around the table, beside the blazing 'fire. On such occasions apples and hickory nuts mingled with the wine; and the amazing consumption of the former, by Washington and his staff, was a theme of boundless wonder to the French guests.* In July, accompanied by Governor Clinton, Washington made the tour of northern New York, and discussed the question of internal navigation by a system of canals, which was subsequently developed by DeWitt Clinton. On his return he was requested, by the president of congress, to attend the session of that body at Princeton. In con- sequence of the illness of Mrs. Washington, however, he could not comply with the request until the 18th of August, on the morning of which day he took his departure from Newburgh. The definite treaty of peace was signed on the 23d of September. After its ratification by congress, that body issued a proclamation (October 18,by which “that part of the army which had stood en- gaged to serve during the war, and by several acts of congress had been furloughed, should be absolutely discharged after the 3d of No- vember from said service; and the further service in the field of the officers on furlough, dispensed with, and permission given to them to retire from service, no more to be called to command." J On the pas- * Yerplanck relates the following anecdote, in connection with this subject, as occurring in Paris: “ The American minister (we forget whether it was Mr. Crawford, Mr. Brown, or one of their successors,) and several of his countrymen, together with La Fayette, were in- vited to an entertainment at the house of a distinguished and patriotic Frenchman, who had served his country in his youth in the United States, during the war of our Indepen- dence. At the supper hour the company were shown into a room fitted up for the occa- sion, which contrasted quite oddly with the Parisian elegance of the other apartments, where they had spent the evening. A low, boarded, painted ceiling, with large beams; a single, small, uncurtained window, with numerous small doors, as well as the general style of the whole, gave at first the idea of the kitchen, or largest room of a Dutch or Belgian farmhouse. On a long rough table was a repast, just as little in keeping with the refined kitchen of Paris, as the room was with its architecture. It consisted of large dishes of meat, uncouth-looking pastry, and wine in decanters and bottles, accompanied by glasses and silver mugs, such as indicated other habits and tastes than those of modern Paris. “ Do you know where we are ?” said the host to General La Fayette and his com- panions. They paused for a jew moments in suspense. They had seen something like this before, but when and where ? “Ah, the seven doors and one window,” said La Fay- ette, “and the silver camp-goblets, such as our marshals of France used in my youth 1 We are at Washington’s head-quarters on the Hudson, fifty years ago.” f By a proclamation of congress, adopted October 18th, all officers and soldiers absent on furlough, were discharged from further service; and all others who had engaged to serve during the war, were to be discharged from and after the 3d of November. A small force only, composed of those who had enlisted for a definite period, were to be retained in service until the peace establishment should be organized.—Irving, iv, 4M. X When the army was disbanded, Washington was at West Point, moving from thence to New York on the evacuation of that city by the British, Nov. 25th, 1783.156 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. sage of this proclamation, Washington, then at Rocky Hill, N. J., prepared his Farewell Orders to the Army of the United Slates, which were dated in advance of their delivery (November 3d,) that they might be read at the same hour at all the points of encampment. In these orders he briefly reviewed the events of the past, and suggested the general line of policy which, in his opinion, should be pursued by the army in the future; promising his recommendations to congress in its behalf, and invoking “the choicest of Heaven's favors” upon all its members, whose efforts had secured “innumerable blessings for others!”—with this benediction drawing the curtain of separation and closing the military scene to him forever. On the morning of November 3d, 1783, the patriot army encamped at Newburgh and New Windsor assembled for the last time. At the head of each regiment and corps the proclamation of congress and the farewell orders of Washington were read, and the formal and last word of command passed along the lines. “Painful,” says Thacher, “was the parting scene; no description can be adequate to the tragic exhibition. Both officers and soldiers, long unaccustomed to the af- fairs of private life, turned loose on the world to starve and become a prey to vulture speculators. Never can that melancholy day be forgotten when friends, companions for seven long years in joy and sorrow, were torn asunder, without the hope of ever meeting again, and with prospects of a miserable subsistence in future.” * Major North, who was also a participant in this parting scene, thus writes: “ At the disbandment of the revolutionary army, when inmates of the same tent, or hut, for seven long years were separating, and probably forever, grasping each other’s hand in silent agony; I saw the Baron Steuben’s strong endeavors to throw some ray of sunshine on the gloom—to mix some drop of cordial with the painful draught. To go, they knew not whither; all recollection of the art to thrive by civil occupation lost, or to the youthful never known. Their hard- earned military knowledge, worse than useless; and with their badgef * Thacher’s Journal, 346. t “ Head-quarters, Newburgh, Wednesday, August 7th, 1782. Honorary badges of distinction are to be conferred on the veteran non-commissioned officers and soldiers of the army who have served more than three years with bravery, fidelity and good conduct: for this purpose a narrow piece of white cloth of an angular form is to be fixed to the left arm on the uniformed coats—non-commissioned officers and soldiers who have served with equal reputation more than six years are to be distinguished by two pieces of cloth set in paral- lel to each other in a similar form. Should any who are not entitled to these honors have the insolence to assume the badges of them, they shall be severely punished. On the other hand, it is expected those gallant men who are thus designated will on all occasions be treated with particular confidence and consideration. The General, ever desirous to cher- ish a virtuous ambition in his soldiers, as well as to foster and encourage every species of military merit, directs that whenever any singularly meritorious action is performed, the author of it shall be permitted to wear on his facings over the left breast, the figure of a heart in purple cloth or silk, edged with narrow lace or binding. Not only instances of unusual gallantry, but also of extraordinary fidelity and essential service in any way, shall meet with due reward. * * This order is also to have retrospect to the earliest stages of the war, and to be considered as a permanent one.”,DISBANDMENT OF THE CONTINENTAL ARMY, NOV. 3, 1783.REVOLUTIONARY EVENTS. 157 of brotherhood, a mark at which to point the finger of suspicion—ig- noble, vile suspicion!—to be cast out on a world long since by them forg’otten. Severed from friends, and all the joys and griefs which soldiers feel! Griefs, while hope remained—when shared by num- bers, almost joys! To go in silence and alone, and poor and hope- less ; it was too hard! On that sad day how. many hearts were wrung! I saw it all, nor will the scene be ever blurred or blotted from my view. To a stern old officer, Lieutenant Colonel Cochran,* from the Green Mountains, who had met danger and dffiiculty almost at every step from his youth, and from whose furrowed visage a tear till that moment had never fallen; the good Baron said what could be said to lessen deep distress. ‘For myself/ said Cochran, ‘I care not; I can stand it; but my wife and daughters are in the garret of that wretclied tavern. I know not where to remove) nor have I means for their removal!7 ‘Come, my friend/ said the Baron, ‘let us go; I will pay my respects to Mrs. Cochran and your daughters, if you please.7 I followed to the loft, and when the Baron left the poor unhappy cast- aways, he left hope with them, and all he had to give! A black man, with wounds unhealed, wept on the wharf; there was a vessel in the stream bound to the place where he once had friends. He had not a dollar to pay his passage, and without it the vessel would not take him. Unused to tears, I saw them trickle down the good Baron7s cheeks as he put into the hands of the black man the last dollar he possessed. The negro hailed the sloop, and as he passed from the small boat on board, ‘ God Almighty bless you, master Baron!7 float- ed from his grateful lips across the parting waters.77 Amid these tragic scenes, the scanty record of which is so touch- ing, the army of the Revolution passed away from the precinct of Newburgh, and the new era of national independence was ushered in. The poverty of the departing soldiers scarcely exceeded that of its people; money they had in abundance, but it was almost worthless; lands they had, but not the means for their successful cultivation; business, they had none—they were very poor; so poor indeed that in 1785, they petitioned the legislature for relief, reciting in their me- morial: “That by reason of the necessary supplies which we have afforded for the support of the late war, as likewise from the depre- ciation of paper currency, and the unavoidable losses incident to the said war, added to the large quantity of personal service, which rendered it impossible for us to cultivate our farms as usual, we are become so impoverished that we are unable to pay our just debts, and, through the scarcity of specie, we are unable upon the credit of * Robert Cochran, of Cumberland county (now in Vermont), was commissioned Major of 3d N. Y. Battalion, Nov. 21, 1776; Lieut. Col. of 2d N. Y., July 1st, 1780.158 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. our lands to hire money for the purpose aforesaid; the frequent and many law suits in justice’s and other courts, the enormous costs that accrues.on small debts, issuing executions, taking effects and selling the same for not near the value, oppresses and reduces many poor families to the want of the necessaries of life, that nothing remains to us in prospect but unavoidable ruin, unless we are relieved by the wisdom of the legislature.”* But though poor, it had a vigorous pop- ulation, which had been increased in number by refugees from New York, who had been compelled to remove from that city on its occu- pation by the British forces in 1776, and whose property there had been confiscated by the officers of the crown. Among these persons, Adolph DeGrove, Derick Ainerman, Daniel Niven, and others, became permanent residents after the peace.j* Besides these refugees, quite a large number of persons who had been in the army, took up their residence in it, among whom were Major Joseph Pettingale, Major Phineas Bowman, Major Levi Dodge, and others, who engaged in com- mercial and business enterprises. Up to the commencement of the war, New Windsor (through the Ellison’s) had mainly absorbed the commercial business of the district, but the shipment of stores to the army demonstrated that Newburgh possessed much greater natural advantages for commerce, besides being nearer the center of popula- lation. The opportunities for occupation and the facilities for devel- opment were also greatly in favor of Newburgh, having been much enlarged during the war. The old “ Town of Newburgh Plot,” which had been opened by the Coldens in 1743, was of limited extent, and without easy access to the river, a fault which had compelled Alex- ander Golden to buy the south-east corner of the Kockerthal farm through which to sweep a winding road to his wharf at the foot of First street, and which had also compelled the officers of the conti- nental army to push the public or continental wharf, which they were obliged to establish, as far north as Third street, where a considerable village of hotels, barracks and other buildings for army use, was established, for the accommodation of which Mr. Benjamin Smith, in 1782, laid out in streets and lots, that portion of his (the Kockerthal) farm lying east of Montgomery street, between South and First streets. This plot, to which he gave the name of “The Township of * This petition is dated Feb. 19th, 1785, and is one of two petitions from the precinct “of one tenor and date.”. It is signed by sixty-eight persons. It was this, and similar petitions from other places, that gave rise to the law of April 18, 1786, entitled “An Act for emitting the sum of Two Hundred Thousand Pounds in Bills of Credit,” under which individuals were enabled to obtain the bills which were issued by mortgage on real estate. By this measure universal individual bankruptcy was avoided, and the people enabled to resume their long-suspended business avocations. The law expired in 1806. f The Clinton papers, in the State Library, contain the petitions of these and other refu- gees, asking for the restoration of their confiscated lands. Under the treaty of peace, however, restoration was not possible.TOWNSHIP PLOTS. 159 Washington,” embraced seventy-two lots, and Montgomery, Smith, and Water, and First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth streets from Montgomery street to the river.* These lots were rapidly taken up, as well as adjoining plots on the Glebe and in the#township of New- burgh; and from the position of the lowest, in 1780, the precinct passed to the fourth, in 1790, and, in a quarter of a century, to the first in rank of population. TOWNSHIP OP WASHINGTON. Streets designated by letters and figures. C—Golden’s Dock. L—Continental Dock. But for some years the village was a disjointed settlement. The three township plots of which it was composed, had no connection except through Liberty street and a few “ cross-lot” roads. In 1790, however, the streets which had been dedicated in the plots were con- nected and opened by the road commissioners of the town, under a general act of the legislature, and an order entered establishing “ a street called Wagon street, running from the S. W. corner of Lot 31, on Western Avenue, easterly on that avenue to the S. W. corner of Lot 16; thence N. E. to the N. W. corner of Lot 9, in the Newburgh town- ships thence easterly until it intersects Water street in the township of Washington. Also, a road beginning at the S. E. corner of High * The names of owners of lots entered on the first map of this plot are: John Anderson, No.’s 1 and 6; James Denton, No. 2: Mr. Menge, No.’s 3 and 13; E. C. Lutherloh, No.’s 4, 10,11, 23, 24 and 35; Jacob Reader, No. 5; A. Fairchild, No.’s 7 and 20; Hugh Walsh, No.’s 8, 21 and 36; Wm. Forbes, No.’s 9 and 22; Mr. Crosby, No. 12; Wm. Quackenbush, No.’s 14 and 15; S. Clark, No. 16; B. Palmer, No. 17; Wm. Thurston, No. 18; Adolph De Grove, No. 19. The remaining lots were held by Mr. Smith, and the streets conveyed by him to the public by deed. This deed and the map of the plot are still preserved. t Old town of Newburgh Plot. See ante page 33. The peculiar angles in all of our principal streets arose from this fact: Colden and his associates in laying out the Old Town of Newburgh Plot, commenced their streets on the natural plateaus. The Trustees of the Glebe laid out their streets parallel with the river. When Smith came to open his land, Water street was placed nearer the river and a corresponding division carried back in Smith and Montgomery streets. When the road commissioners took the duly in hand of joining together the streets thus dedicated in the three distinct original divisions of the present city, an angle was formed in Water street at the junction with Wagon (now north end of Colden), and with South street; and also at the'junction of High and Smith streets and of Montgomery and Hasbrouck streets. The angle is necessarily followed in Grand street, and mars Chambers and other streets more recently opened. The citizens of Newburgh thus have a perpetual memorial of the “ Township Of Newburgh,” the “Township of Washington” and of the “ Glebe.”160 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. street and running N. E. along that street to the N. W. corner of Lot 19, in the township of Newburgh; thence N. E. to First street in the township of Washington; thence across said street intersecting Smith street, and thence northerly to South street. Also, a street called Montgomery street in the township of Washington, beginning at the S. E. corner of a lot given by Benjamin Smith for the use of the Pres- byterian congregation, and thence northerly to South street.” Also, roads called First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth streets. Also, a road beginning in. the S. W. corner of Lot 1, in the township of Washington, and running southerly across the lands of the heirs of Richard Nicolls Golden in a direct course to the end of Watdr street in the township of Newburgh, between Lots 1 and 9. This order, it will be seen, opened Water street from South street to Western avenue; Colden or Wagon street from Water street to Western Avenue; High street; Smith street; Montgomery street; and First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth streets, the latter from the river to Montgomery street. Wagon street intersected the “ Wall- kill road,” as it was called. The streets on the Glebe, were, in the main, easily connected. South street, the dividing line, originally laid out directly west to the west bounds of the patent, was first opened from Liberty street to the river; west of Liberty street its course was subsequently changed* and what is Gidney avenue formed. North street was also opened from Liberty street to the river. Such, with the addition of Liberty street, already noticed, were the opened streets of the present city of Newburgh, in 1791. The precinct of Newburgh continued to be recognized by that name until 1788, when, by an act of the legislature “fordividing the Coun- ties of the State into Towns,” passed March 7th of that year, the title of “precinct” gave place to that of “town.”f The boundaries, how- ever,, remained unchanged, and as they at present exist. The history of the Glebe has been brought down to the period of the Revolution. The Rev. John Saver, the successor of Mr. Watkins, resigned the charge in 1775, and during the war the church had no minister. The school, however, was continued by Mr. John Nathan Hutchins,J who, in addition to his duties as teacher, read prayers in the old church on the Sabbath. On the death of Mr. Hutchins, in * Minutes of Trustees of Glebe, Sep. 22,1791. “ Whereas, there is a vacancy of eight rods left on the south side of the Minister’s lot for a street, which, running through wet ground and over a high hill, is impracticable—agreed, to enclose said road, and allow a road of four rods wide to run through the lot from opposite Martin Weigand’s to the northward of a piece of swamp land adjoining said high hills.’’ t Ante p. 39 $ The fact here stated is from a MSS. found among the papers of Isaac Belknap. The paper recites, that owing to the scarcity of money and other difficulties in collecting the Glebe rents, Mr. Hutchins’ salary had not been fully paid, there being due him at the time of his death the sum of eighty-two pounds one shilling and sixpence.GLEBE DIFFICULTIES. 161 1782, Mr. Richard King* was selected as teacher; and in 1790, the Rev. George H. Spierin performed the duties of minister and school- master. Changes had also occurred in the trustees. Mr. Alexander Colden died in 1775, and his place had been filled by Isaac Belknap; and on the death of Mr. Albertson, Mr. Henry Smith was elected his successor. It was during the year 1790, that the discussions commenced which subsequently terminated the control of the Episcopal church over the Glebe. In June, of that year, Col. Cadwallader Colden, was elected trustee,* to fill the vacancy occasioned by the death of Henry Smith; and almost immediately after his election, those opposed to the church raised the question of his eligibility, he being a non-resident although a freeholder on the patent. To meet the difficulty, Colden proposed an amendment of the charter so as to permit the election as trustees of persons residing within twelve miles of the patent who were free- holders thereon; and the trustees adopted a petition to the legislature to that effect. The opponents of the churcH-immediately drew up a counter petition, asking the legislature “that no act relative to the premises be passed until the collected sense of the parish be taken.” This petition, or remonstrance, was very numerously signed; and led to the calling of a meeting, by the trustees, to take the whole subject into considera- tion. The call was issued on the 7th, and the meeting held on the 10th of February, at the house of Martin Weigand, at 2 o’clock P. M. The inhabitants of the patent, regarding the affair as an attempt on the part of the church to divert the revenues of the Glebe from the support of a school, to which they had been wholly applied since 1775, were thoroughly aroused and attended the meeting in large numbers. After a turbulent discussion of considerable length, the proposition to amend the charter was rejected, f The result of this meeting led to, in May following, the resignation of Colden as trustee, and of Spierin as school-master. J Colden’s re- signation was accepted; and, on the 16th May, Isaac Hasbrouck was * June 4,1790. Col. Cadwallader Colden elected trustee. Thirty-six votes were cast, thirty of which were for Colden, and six for Isaac Hasbrouck.—Minutes. f Feb. 10,1791. A motion was then made and seconded, whether there shall be an al- teration of the charter or not. . After some debate upon the question, it was agreed that the sense of the people should be taken by ballot, and was carried in favor of those against the alteration by a majority of thirty-four.—Minutes. + May 3,1791*. The Trustees met at the house of Martin Weigand, and being opened, Col. Colden observed that upon consideration of the difaculties that seemed to attend the trusteeship since he was elected, and in all probability were likely to be continued, it ap- peared that the inhabitants of said patent were very much divided; and therefore con- cluded that it might tend to restore peace and harmony among them, and so be for the public good of the parish, for him to resign his office as trustee; and accordingly he de- livered his resignation. The Rev. Mr. Spierin proposed not to have anything to do with the Glebe school any further, Which the trustees agreed to. Agreed, also* by said trus- tees, that the income of the Glebe lands be equally divided between Mr. Spierin and the school-master.—Minutes. on162 BIS TO BY OF NEWBURGH. elected his successor, haying received fifty-one votes and William Seymour sixteen. The resignation of Spierin produced no other action than a resolution to divide the income of the Glebe equally as compensation for the duties of minister and school-master respective- ly, until the 28th of May, when the trustees conferred with Spierin on the subject, and obtained his consent to be inducted.* Mr. Spierin continued to serve as minister and school-master until 1793 or *94. Meanwhile the subject of the disposal of the revenues of the Glebe was more or less discussed. The membership of the Episcopal church had dwindled away until very few of that denomi- nation remained; and the inhabitants belonging to other churches, as well as those who were opposed on principle to even an inferential association of the church with the conduct of the public schools, renewed their efforts to get the revenues exclusively applied to the support of a school-master. The old trustees insisted upon maintain- ing their agreement with Mr. Spierin; and, having no other alterna- tive, the people held a meeting and elected William Seymour and Phineas Howell trustees, and voted that the Glebe rents should be paid to them. This action led to a compromise, in virtue of which both the old and the new trustees resigned their places, and Timothy Hudson and Phineas Howell were chosen their successors.*)' In this way the revenues of the Glebe passed from the control of the Episcopal church. History repeated itself. The very means— the elective franchise conferred on the inhabitants by the charter— which the Episcopalians had employed to wrest the privileges of the patent from the Lutherans, had been successfully used for their own overthrow in the hour of similar numerical weakness. The Glebe now passed wholly into the hands of the people, and its limited but useful system of free education was divested of sectarian control. ; The concluding years of the ceiitury were marked by the formal incorporation of the Presbyterian and the Associate Reformed churches; and by the establishment of the Newburgh Academy. An attempt had been made to organize the latter institution in 1791, and for that pur- pose authority was asked from the legislature to establish a lottery —a mode of raising money for subh purposes very, common at that time. This petition failed, and during the pendency of the difficulties in regard to the Glebe, little was done. In 1795, however, the project was again taken in hand by the trustees of the Glebe, and the present Academy building was erected. Meanwhile the progress of the town had not been confined to the German patent. As lands were cleared and planted, grist and saw * Minutes, May 28,1791. f Minutes, Sept. 22, Oct. 13 and 27,1794.TOWN SETTLEMENTS. 163 mills were erected, and the ancient forests, “ through which one coul WASHINGTON’S HEAD-QUARTERS-From the East. —Sitting Room. —Family Room. (oldest part of building.) C—Kitchen. D—Hall. E—Washington’s Parlor, p—Washington’s Private Room. (communicating with) G—Washington’s Bed-room. H—Store-room.LOCALITIES. 215 goes, that Washington had accepted an invitation to dine with Col. Ettrick, who had, meanwhile, made arrangements with a company of tories to take him prisoner. Washington, warned of the design, ordered a detachment of the life-guard, dressed in the English uni- form, to be on the ground before the arrival of the tories. When this detachment, made its appearance, Washington’s host, supposing them to be his tory friends, stepped up to him and accosted him as his pris- oner. Washington looked at his troops for a moment and replied, “I believe not, sir, but you are mine.” The treacherous host was spared his life, through the intercession of his daughter, who had betrayed her father’s intention, and he was permitted to remove to Nova Scotia. The story has some elements of probability. Washington’s Head-quarters.—The building now so generally known as “ Washington’s Head-quarters at Newburgh,” is situated on Liberty street in the south part of the city. It is constructed of rough stone; is one story high, fifty-six feet front by forty-six feet in depth, and is located on what was originally Lot No. 2, of the Herman patent. The title to the lot was vested, by the patent referred to, in Herman Schoneman, a native of the Palatinate of Germany, who sold, in 1721, to James Alexander, who subsequently sold to Alexander Colden and Burger Meynders, by whom the property was conveyed by Jonathan Hasbrouck. The south-east corner of the building, more particularly shown by the walls and the timbers of the roof remaining in the attic, is the oldest portion, but by whom erected is not positively known. The north-east corner was erected by Hasbrouck in 1750, and the west half was added by him in 1770, and one roof thrown over the whole. The dates of the additions are cut upon stones in the walls. The building was made the head-quarters of Washington in the spring of 1782, and remained in his occupation until August 18th, 1783. The general incidents occurring during that period have already been nar- rated. • As is shown by the account which he rendered to the govern- ment, Washington maintained here his own household.* While in his occupation the large rooiii, which is entered from the piazza on the east, known “ as the room with seven doors and one window,” was the dining and sitting room; the north-east room was Washington’s bedroom, and the room immediately adjoining on the left, his private office.f The family room was that in the south-east; the kitchen was the south-west room; the parlor the north-west room, and between the latter and the former was the store-room,J hall and stair-case. The * No part of the building was occupied by the Hasbroucks, as has generally been sup- posed, during Washington’s residence. f Tradition has assigned this room to Hamilton; but it is now conclusively known that that officer was not a member of Washington’s staff at the time, nor even a visitant, $ So called from having been used by Col. Hasbrouck as a store.HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. 216 property remained in the Hasbrouck family until 1849, when the title became vested in the people of the state under the foreclosure of a mortgage given to the commissioners to loan certain moneys of the United States. By act of the legislature, passed April 10, 1850, it was placed in the care of the board of trustees of the village of Newburgh, to be preserved as nearly as possible as it was at the time of its occupation by Washington. The building was at once restored, by a committee appointed b}^ the board of trustees, and the place formally dedicated on the 4th of July, 1850. The care of the prop- erty passed to the city authorities, by the city charter, where it remained until 1874, when the legislature appointed, by act of May 11, a board of trustees to hold and maintain it. A large, and in some departments valuable, collection of manuscripts and relics are now deposited in the building, for which, as well as for the initiatory steps by which the state authorities were induced to purchase the property, the public are mainly indebted to the late Enoch Carter, although many articles of value have been added by other parties, and espe- cially by the state and the federal authorities.* The trees now grow- ing were planted by residents of Newburgh and vicinity. Public Stocks.—By colonial law, minor offenses were punished by confinement in the public stocks, or by public whipping, and each town and precinct had its whip- ping-post and stocks. Those erected in Newburgh were in Water street, opposite the High- land Bank, and were standing after the commencement of the present century. A map of the property of Thomas Golden, made in 1791, shows the location of the public stocks. stocks, and an outline represen- tation, from which, as well as from a description by the late Mr. Benj. Carpenter, the accompanying engraving was drawn. The stocks con- sisted of a frame resembling a heavy square box, on the edge of which were seats. The bar for confining the feet of prisoners was about four- teen feet in length and was secured by heavy padlocks. Near the center of the frame stood the whipping-post, which was some ten feet high with arms placed in an angular position. The stocks were pro- bably removed in 1810 or ’12. Newburgh Market.—The act incorporating the village gave the board of trustees power to establish a market and lease the stands, * The state contributed trophy and other guns from the old Arsenal. Thirty trophy guns were added by order of Hon. W. W. Belknap in 1873.LOCALITIES. 217 NEWBURGH MARKET. and a building for that purpose was erected at the foot of Third, now the west line of Front street. The first leasing of stands occurred in 1811, when Jas. Lyon, Ed. Griswold, Chas. Birdsall, and David Tice, were licensed as butchers—Birdsall and Griswold occupying two stands each. Wm. Mathew- son also occupied one for several years. The build- ing was of wood, one story high and open as represent- ed in the engraving. Third street divided and ran on the north and south sides of the market to the ferry and public landing. During the winters, when the stands were not occupied, the lads had merry times in riding down “ McAuley's hill/7 as Third street was called, and shooting through the market. The building was removed in 1822 or 723, and about the same time a new market of improved architect- ure was erected by John Neely, on the north side of Third street, east of Water. The amended charter of 1836 relieved the trustees from the duty of providing a market building, and that then in use was removed or converted to other use. Hay-scales.—The Hay-scales were a landmark on Western Avenue for over a quarter of a century. They were erected in 1806, and by the sub- sequent opening of Grand street were left standing on a small triangle at the junction of that street and the avenue, where they remained in use until the 8th of January, 1838, when they were prostrated during a remarkably heavy gale of wind.* The scales were of pecu- liar construction, and were composed of a beam from which chains were sus- pended for raising the teams which i were to be weighed. The north end was enclosed for a weighing room, and the roof was extended south to cover the beam. It will be inferred, of course, that the structure was the approved pattern of the times; platform scales were then unknown. The accompanying engraving is from description by Mr. John H. Corwin. HAY-SCALES. * This gale was the most severe of any on record. It occurred in the afternoon.218 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. CENSUS RETURNS. Although enumerations of the inhabitants of the several precincts of New York were made at an early period, the returns are very imperfect. The early tax rolls give more complete statistics, and in those relating to the precinct of the Highlands is the following: “The Freeholders, Inhabitants, Residents and Sojourners of the County of Ulster, theire real and personal estates are Rated to be assessed by the Assessors (on theire Oath) chosen for the same on the 20th day of January 1714-5, and are to pay after the rate of one penny half per £ to discharge this years payment of said County’s Quota* Layd by an Act of the P. Assembly, Entitled an Act for Levying the sume of Ten Thousand pounds, viz: Precinct of Highlands. Rated. Tax. Rated. Tax. Peter Magregorie, £30 £ 3s 9d Wm. Elsworth’s widow, £5 £ 0s 74 Swerver, 5 0 74 Dennis Relje, 3 0 4 William Sutherland, 45 5 7} Alexander Griggs, 35 4 4 Michael Wynant, 15 1 10 Thomas Harris, 5 0 74 Burger Myndertsen, 10 1 3 Capt. Bond, 15 1 104 Jacob Weber, 15 i m Melgert the Joyner, 15 1 104 Peter LaRoss, 10 1 3 Christian Henrick, 3 0 44 John Fisher, 10 1 3 Jacob Decker, Jun, 10 1 3 Andres Volck, 12 1 6 Cornelis Decker, 5 0 7\ George Lockstead, 10 1 3 Pieter Jansen, 10 1 3 293 1 16 Henry Rennau, 25 3 li With the exception of Peter MacGregorie and William Sutherland, who held lands in New Windsor, and the Deckers, Griggs, Bond, and Harris, the persons named were residents or freeholders in the present town and city of Newburgh, and, with the exception of Myndertsen, Ellsworth, and Relje, were Palatinate settlers. Similar returns for the years I'll MS, 1724-’5, and 1726-,9> exhibit the increase of residents and freeholders in the precinct, as follows: 1717-8 Peter MacGregory, Wm. Sutherland, Michael Wynant, Jacob Weber, John Fischer, Andries Volck, Wm. Chambers, John Lawrence, His Ex. William Burnett, Widow Elsworth, Phineas McIntosh, Thos. Ellis (on), George Lockstead, Jeurian Quick, William Bond, Burger Minders, Thomas Brainer, widow, William Ward, Geo. Waggont, Wm. Sanders, Alexander Mackel, Henry Rennau, Widow Elsworth, Denis Relje, Wm. Bond, Alexander Griggs, Melgert de Schrynwerker, 1724-5 Doct. Colden, Geo. Elmes, Tobias Waggont, Valentyn Breasure, John Humphrey, David Sutherland, John Davids, John Wilson, Old Denes, William Fountain, Gomoz the Jew, Christopher Febb, John Askell, John Armtyne, Thomas Edwards, Col. Mathews, Mr. Gomoz, Burger Myndertsen, A. Graham, Mr. Chambers, Peter Jansen’s estate. Z. Hoffman, Michael Bolls,. Henry Wileman, Daniel Denes, John Slater, John Filips, Robt. Kirkland, John Alsop, Peter Long, Peter Mulhner, Melcher Gillis, Henry Hedsel, Benj. Elsworth, Nathaniel Foster. * The tax laid on the precincts of the county are given in this return as follows: Kingston, Foxhall Manor, Hurley, Marbletown, Rochester, Valuation. £9176 1322 4398 5142 3523 Tax. £57 7s Od 8 27 32 22 New Palles, Shawangonck, Wagackkemeck, Highlands, Valuation. £2(175 848 105 293 Tax. £12 19s 44 5 6 0 0 13 14 1 16 7} 168 0 3 Totals, 26882CENSUS RETURNS. 219 Wm. Chambers, Phineas McIntosh, Thomas Ellison, James Elsworth, Jurie Quick, Wm. Bond, Gomoz the Jew, Burger Meynderse, Jr., Moses Elsworth, John Haskell, John Alsop, Esq., William Ward, John Vantine, 1726-9. John Davis, Melgert Gillis, Geo. Speedwell, Benj. Elsworth, Nathl. Foster, Francis Harrison, J. Mackneel, Jr., James Gamwell, Stephen Bedford, Thomas Shaw, Joseph Gale, Henry-----, John Mond, Geo. Wagagont (Weigand).' Burger Meynderse, Wm. Saunders, Alex. Mackie, Cad. Colden, John Slaughter, George-----, Tobias Wagagont, Robert Strickland, John Umphrey, Peter Long, David Sutherland, Peter Muliner, Christain Chevis. The names of persons enrolled for military duty in 1138, which will be given hereafter, represents the residents of the precinct of the Highlands at that time; while the male population of the precinct of Newburgh, over sixteen years of age, in 1115, is probably correctly represented in connection with the pledge of association heretofore quoted.* The militia rolls of the precinct (1118^9), are perhaps the best record of male population at that time. An enumeration of the inhabitants of the precinct was taken in 1182, pursuant to an act of the provincial convention entitled “An Act for taking the number of white inhabitants within this State,” passed March 20, of that year. It gave a population to Newburgh of 1,481, divided as follows: Males under 16, 429; over 16 and under 60, 252; over 60, 31. Females under 16, 368; over 16, 311. Number of persons making Newburgh their place of abode “by reason of the invasion of the enemy,” 154, viz: Males under 16, 36; over 16 and under 60, 26: over 60, 6. Females under 16, 42; over 16, 44.f In 1185, the precinct was divided into road districts, and a record made of the persons assessed for high- way labor. This list embraces three hundred and nineteen names. The several census taken since 1182, exhibit the following results: Tear. Population. Increase. Year. Population. Increase. 1790 2,365 878 1840 8,933 1,150 • 1800 3,258 893 1845 9,001 68 1810 4,627 1,369 1850 11,425 2,424 1814 5,107 480 1855 12,773 1,348 1820 5,812 705 1860 15,196 2,423 1825 6,168 356 1865 17,389 2,193 1830 6,424 256 1870 20,563 3,174 1835 7,783 1,359 1875 20,996 433 These returns include the population of the town and of the village prior to, and of the town and city since, 1865. An enumeration taken in the year 1814, gave the population of the village as 2,323; in 1811, 2,464; in 1821, 2,811; in 1822, 3,566; in 1855, 9,256. / The population of the city in 1810 was 11,021; in 1815, 11,433. The population of the town in 1810 was 3,542; in 1815, 3,543.J While the increase in population has been slow, it has not receded in any decade. * Ante p. 136. f Documentary History of New York, iii, 996. t The figures for 1875 in this statement are not official.220 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. NEWBURGH POOR SYSTEM. Provision for maintaining the poor was included in the act creating the precinct of Newburgh.. The first record in relation to the subject, aside from the annual election of overseers of the poor, occurs in 1769, when £30 were raised “for the support of the poor for the year ensuing.” In 1711, the following rules were adopted at the annual precinct meeting, viz: “Rule first.—Voted, as an encouragement to all succeeding Poor Masters, the more faithfully to discharge their duty in their office, by preventing all unnecessary charges and needless costs on the inhabitants of the Precinct, and also as a reward for their good ser- vices, we freely vote them the sum of £10 each, to be paid out of the money voted to be raised for the use of the poor or out of such fines as may be raised for the same use. “ Rule third.—Voted, that no Poor Master for the time being shall for any cause whatever, relieve or cause to be relieved, or made chargeable, any person or persons what- ever, that may by law be transported; or any private person who can be made account- able according to law; on pain of perjury, and making themselves liable to pay all such charges, and forfeit to the use of the poor twenty shillings and charges of prosecution, to be recovered before any of his Majesty’s Justices of the Peace.” In 1775, £50 were raised for the poor; in 1777, £100; in 1778, £200. At the annual meeting in the latter year, it was “ Voted, That donations be collected in this Precinct to be applied to such poor whose husbands or parents were either killed or taken prisoners at Fort Montgomery.” 1780.—“ Voted, That £800 be raised for the poor.” 1800,—“Voted, To hire a house for the accommodation of the Poor.” 1805—“Voted, That the Overseers of the Poor be authorized to contract with one or more persons to take the whole of the poor, and to put out the children as they shall see best for the town. ” The increase of population made it necessary to provide larger accommodations for the poor; and, in 1814, an act of the legislature was passed authorizing the construction of a town poor-house. The town voted (April 1,) a tax of $1,500 for that purpose; and appointed John Mandevill and Benoni H. Howell, overseers of the poor, to act with Andrew DeWitt, John D. Lawson, Eleazer Gidney and Henry Butterworth, commissioners, “ to direct the building of the house and to take the whole management of the same.” A site was selected on the north-east corner of Water and North street, and a building com- pleted in the course of the year. The system was conducted with success and economy, as the following figures from the annual report will show, viz: 1827—House expenses: Victualing, Clothing, &c., $297 71 Wood, 81 87 Doctor’s bill, 68 19 Keeper’s wages, 50 00 Temporary relief, 651 75 Tax, On hand, Fines, &c., Receipts: $750 00 385 m 17 81} 1,153 23 1,144: 52 In 1830, the receipts were $2,172.64£, and disbursements $1,158.58J In 1831, receipts, $3,160.69|; disbursements, $1,648.64; expenses of alms-house, $872.72f. In 1830, the Orange County Poor-house was erected at a cost of $12,000; and on the 22d April, 1831, the legislature authorized the sale of the Newburgh Poor-house and lands, which was soon afterNEWBURGH ALMS-HOUSE,POOR SYSTEM. 221 effected, and the proceeds were applied to the payment of the county poor tax. Connection with the county system was continued until 1852, when the rapidly increasing charges for temporary relief arous- ed public attention and investigation. The subject was first brought before the board of supervisors by Mr. Enoch Carter, supervisor, and the abuses of the county system were thoroughly exposed. At the instance of Mr. Carter, the board adopted the following resolution, viz: Resolved, That in the opinion of this Board of Supervisors, it would be for the mutual interest of the citizens of Newburgh and of Orange County, that an application be made to the Legislature by the citizens of the town of Newburgh for the passage of an Act. paying to the town of Newburgh her proportionate interest in the present county house, and also empowering said town to provide a town house for her own poor, the expenses of which shall be borne by the town of Newburgh. The inhabitants of Newburgh immediately responded to the action of the board of supervisors by a public meeting held at Crawford’s Hall, on the evening of the 11th of December, Mr. George Cornwell, chairman, and James W. Fowler, secretary. The subject was dis- cussed by Messrs. N. Eeeve, J. J. Monell, Wm. C. Hasbrouck, and G. C. Monell; and a series of resolutions, offered by J. J. Monell, were adopted. A committee of twelve persons,—viz: Messrs. John W. Brown, David W. Bate, Wm. C. Hasbrouck, J. J. Monell, John Beve- ridge, Homer Ramsdell, Gilbert C. Monell, Lewis W. Young, Charles Drake, Enoch Carter, Charles U. Cushman, and Ke.v. Jno. Forsyth,— was appointed to prepare, and report at a subsequent meeting, an act to be passed by the legislature to reestablish a town system for sup- porting the poor. At a meeting held December 80th, Mr. Brown, from the committee for that purpose, submitted the draft of a law, accompanied by an able report illustrating the necessity of the movement, stating, among other facts, that “Previous to 1840, the sums expended for temporary relief seldom, if ever, exceeded $1600, for the county, and $600 for this town. The Superintendent’s Report for 1838 ex- hibits this item at $1589.27, for the county, of which $560.90 was for the town of New- burgh. The report for 1839 exhibits the same item at $1658.45 for the county, of which $585.90 was for the town of Newburgh. This item of expenditure has grown with a steady and rapid growth, until we find it set down in the Superintendent’s Report for the year 1852, at $12,802.13 for the county, of which $6,451.90 is set down as expended in the town of Newburgh. But it is due to the occasion to say, that notwithstanding the figures of this report, and the known integrity of its authors, the committee have good authority for saying that the expenditure for temporary relief for the last year was little short of $14,000 for the county, and $8,000 for the town of Newburgh.” The act applied for passed the legislature, March 23, 1853. By its terms the town of Newburgh was established as a separate and dis- tinct poor district, and a corporation created by the name of “the Commissioners of the Alms-house of the town of Newburgh.” The commissioners named in the act, viz: Henry Wyckoff, David W. Bate, David H. Barclay, George Gearn, Alfred Post, and Eugene A. Brewster, immediately entered upon the discharge of their duties, and a farm was purchased and the erection of suitable buildings com-222 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. menced under contract with Mr.John Little, Jr. The building was completed and opened Dec. 10th, 1853, and was occupied by six per- sons from the town of Newburgh and forty-nine (exclusive of insane), from the County Poor-house, being the number apportioned to New- burgh under the act of separation. By the act incorporating the city (1865), the town and the city are united in the system. The operation of the system, during the first fifteen years of its existence, is stated in the 15th annual report of the commissioners, from which it appears, that during that period the receipts from all sources was $152,332.81, and the expenses, including buildings, etc., $149,365.81; average yearly cost by tax, $4,558.11; average yearly cost of each pauper, $53.82—weekly, $1.03; estimated saving, as compared with the county system, in fifteen years, $108,318.93. TURNPIKES AND PLANK-ROADS. The organizations of the Newburgh and Cochecton, Newburgh and New Windsor, Newburgh and Sullivan, Newburgh and Plattekill, and the Snake Hill turnpike companies, have already been referred to.* In the autumn of 1849, the construction of a plank-road from Newburgh to Ellenville was proposed. In January (14th), 1850, a meeting of citizens was held at the United States Hotel,—Homer Ramsdell, presi- dent, and Robert Proudfit, Jr., secretary,—and on motion of David Crawford, a committee of twenty-five was appointed “ to go out to Ellenville, in company with engineers, and inquire into the practica- bility of constructing a plank-road thither, and the best route for the same.” The committee employed Mr. W. A. Perkins, engineer, to make a survey of the route, who, on the 13th March, submitted a report at a public meeting. The report presented a survey of three routes, southern, northern, and middle, with an estimate of the cost of each; and, on motion, it was resolved, that “measures be taken to organize a company for the construction of- a plank-road to Ellenville with a capital of $100,000.” Committees were appointed to ascertain the amount of stock that would be subscribed, and the land dama- ges claimed, by persons residing on each of the proposed routes. On * The Newburgh and Cochecton turnpike company was organized in 1801. (Ante p. 184). The Newburgh and New Windsor turnpike company was incorporated by Act of the legislature passed April 2d, 1806. Capital $5,000 Charles Clinton, Daniel Strmgham, John McAuley, George Monell, Hugh Walsh, Isaac Hasbrouck, Selah Reeve, Joseph Monell, Abraham Schultz, Richard Trimble, Jonas Williams, John D. Nicoll and Samuel Lockwood, first directors. The Orange and Ulster Branch turnpike company was incor- porated March 30, 1810. Capital $35,000. Cornelius Bruyn, James Rumsey, Abraham Jansen, John D. Lawson, John McAulay, Moses Rosekranse, Nicholas Hardenburgh, Johannes T. Jansen, directors. The route was through Rocky Forest and New Hurley to Sullivan county by way of Sam’s Point. The Newburgh and Plattekill turnpike company was incorporated April 5, 1810. Capital $14,000. Jacob Powell, Daniel Smith, John Wells, Jonathan Bailey, Justus Cooley and Henry Butterworth, directors. The Snake Hill turnpike company was incorporated March 24, 1815. Capital $14,000. Jonathan Hasbrouck, William Taylor, Hiram Weller, Nathaniel DuBois! and Jonathan Hedges, direc- tors. With the exception of the Newburgh and Cochecton and Newburgh and New Wind- sor, these turnpikes have been abandoned and opened as common highways.TURNPIKES AND PLANK-ROADS. 223 the 24th March, a meeting of subscribers to the stock of the ‘‘New- burgh and Ellenville Plank-road Company,” was held at the United States Hotel,—Homer Ramsdell, president, and E. Pitts, secretary,— and, on motion, proceeded to the election of nine directors, when the following named gentlemen were chosen: Newburgh—Homer Ramsdell, E. W. Farrington, David Crawford, Thornton M. Niven, William Fullerton; Ulstervitte—A. R. Taylor; Walden—A. F. Schofield; Shawangunk— James G. Graham; Bruynswick—Richard Jackson. At a subsequent meeting of the directors, Homer Kamsdell wTas elected president; E. W. Farrington, vice president; T. M. Niven, sec- retary; and David Moore, treasurer. At a meeting of the directors, held April 5th, it was resolved to adopt the southern route; and at a meeting on the 11th, it was agreed to put the work under contract as soon as $100,000 should be subscribed. Immediately after this action, those in favor of a northern route organized the “Newburgh and Shawangunk Plank-road Company,” and, at a meeting held on the 18th April, elected Robert A. Forsyth, Cornelius C. Smith, John B. Jamison, Odell S. Hathaway, Richard A. Southwick, Jacob V. B. Fowler, of Newburgh, and James G. Graham, S. M. Bruyn and Jas. N. Mitchell, of Shawangunk, directors; Jacob V. B. Fowler was elected president; Robert A. Forsyth, treasurer; and R. A. Southwick, secretary. Both companies were organized under the general statute of May 7, 1847, and the roads were completed in December, 1851.* The capital stock of the Ellenville road, paid in, was $79,770. To com- plete the work and pay existing indebtedness, the legislature passed an act authorizing the issue of $44,000 in preferred stock, and fixing the whole capital at $124,000. The capital stock of the Newburgh, and Shawangunk road, paid in, was $30,000. Both roads were subse- quently converted into turnpikes. RAILROAD ENTERPRISES. The organization of a company for the construction of a railroad to connect Newburgh with the coal mines of Pennsylvania, was first proposed in 1829, and an act was passed by the legislature, on the 19th of April, 1830, constituting and appointing David Crawford, Christopher Reeve, John P. DeWint, Thomas Powell, Joshua Conger, Charles Borland, William Walsh, John Forsyth, and their associates, “ a body corporate and politic by the name of the Hudson and Dela- ware Railroad Company,” for the purpose of constructing a single or double railroad or way, from any part of the village of Newburgh, through the county of Orange to the Delaware river. The capital of the company was fixed at $500,000, with power to increase the same * The opening of the south plank was celebrated at Ellenville, Dec. 22. A large delega- tion from Newburgh was present. *224 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. to $1,000,000, if necessary; and David Crawford, Charles Borland, Peter Cuddeback, Thos. Powell, J.. P. DeWint, Jos. Kernochan, Peter H. Schenck, and John W. Knevels were appointed commissioners to open subscriptions. This act, however, became void—no effort having been made to build the road “within three years” after the time of its passage. Nothing more was done until the 30th of September, 1835, when a meeting of citizens was held at the Orange Hotel (pursuant to a call signed by David Euggles, John Forsyth, Nathaniel DuBois, Chas. H. Bellows, Oliver Davis, and David Crawford), of which Gilbert 0. Fow- ler was chosen president; Nathaniel DuBois, vice president, and John W. Knevels, secretary. The subjects discussed at this meeting were, mainly, these two, viz: What course should be pursued in reference to an application to the legislature for a subscription on the part of the state to the New York and Erie railroad company; and the feasi- bility of uniting the Hudson and Delaware road with that of the New York and Erie. The meeting “ Resolved, That we will unite in the application to the legislature for a subscription on the part of the state to the stock of the New York and Erie railroad company. That we will also join in a petition to the legislature for the grant of a charter upon liberal terms in- corporating a company to construct a railway from this village to the Delaware river, and that we will bear our proportion according to our several means in subscription to the stock. 1 ‘ Resolved, That a committee of five persons be appointed to communicate with the directors of the New York and Erie railroad company, and present to them a proposition (as detailed to the meeting) for uniting the efforts of the inhabitants of this vicinity with that company in the successful prosecution of the project for constructing a railroad from Lake Erie to the Hudson river.” On this committee the following persons were placed, viz: John W. Knevels, Nathaniel DuBois, Oliver Davis, and G. 0. Fowler. The following resolution was also unanimously concurred in, viz: “ Resolved, That a committee be appointed whose duty it shall be to give the required legal notice in the public newspapers of our intention to apply for an act of incorporation for the construction of a railway from the village of Newburgh to the Delaware river; to prepare and circulate petitions to the legislature in behalf of this application; to draft the act of incorporation, and report their proceedings to the meeting at the time to which it shall stand acyourned.” The following persons were appointed upon the last mentioned committee, viz: John W. Knevels, Abraham M. Smith, John Forsyth, John Thayer, Benjamin H. Mace. Now began the struggle to secure the eastern terminus of the Erie road at Newburgh; and the interests of the Delaware road, as a dis- tinct project, awaited the issue. When it became known that those active in the Erie company had decided in favor of the Piermont route, the citizens of Newburgh again took up the Delaware project, and, on the 21st of April, 1836, the legislature passed an act “to re- new and amend” the original charter. By this act, “ David Crawford, Christopher Reeve, Oliver Davis, John Forsyth, Thos. Powell, Joshua Conger, David Ruggles, Benjamin Carpenter, and their associates,” were constituted a body politic and corporate, by the name of “ TheRAILROAD ENTERPRISES. 225 Hudson and Delaware Railroad Company,” for the purpose of con- structing a road “commencing in the north part of the village of Newburgh, and running from thence along the Hudson river in front of said village as far as the trustees of the said village ” should deter- mine, and thence to the Delaware river. The capital stock of the com- pany was fixed at $500,000, and Gilbert 0. Fowler, Charles Borland, John Forsyth, Thomas Powell, Benj. H. Mace, John P. DeWint, Abra- ham M. Smith, Jas. G. Clinton, and John W. Knevels, were appointed commissioners to open subscriptions. On the 15th June, 1836, the first election for directors, under the amended act, was held at the Orange Hotel, when Thomas Powell, 'John Forsyth, David Crawford, Benjamin Carpenter, John P. DeWint, John Ledyard, Christopher Reeve, Gilbert 0. Fowler, James G. Clinton, Nathaniel DuBois, Samuel G. Sneden, David W. Bate, and Oliver Davis, were chosen. At a subsequent meeting of the directors, Thomas Powell was elected president; David W. Bate, vice president; John Ledyard, treasurer; and James G. Clinton, secretary. A survey of the route was made soon after by John B. Sargeant, who reported the length of the proposed road as thirty-eight miles, and the cost as $10,000 per mile. Stock to a sufficient amount having been subscribed,* steps were taken to grade the section between Washingtonville and the Quassaick creek. Ground was broken on the 3d of November, 1836, with appropriate ceremonies, and the auspicious event was celebrated by a general illumination of the village.f In response to a petition on the part of the citizens in- terested in the road, the legislature, in the early part of the session * The Telegraph of August 26, says: “Great liberality in ceding lands for the track we understand is manifested in many instances. A large landholder in one instance, whose extensive lands are traversed for some distance by the line, (we allude to the Hon. R. Denniston), gave the company permission to take without price, any route except through his house. Such a spirit as tHis will build the road speedily.” t A general illumination by the citizens of the village took place on Thursday evening last, to celebrate the commencement of the Hudson and Delaware railroad—the notice for which, to many was first announced by the blazing of tar barrels throughout the streets; but no sooner was it generally known than every window in the village from the cellar to the garret which could show a light was filled with blazing candles. The spirit with which the storekeepers vied with each other on the occasion was well displayed, for having placed candles in every pane of glass in their windows, they paraded them in rows on the awning jails—which gave to the closely populated part of the village a most splendid appearance. The private residences of'the merchants and wealthy residents on the upper streets are also deserving of notice; among those who had something extra both in point of position and brilliancy of effect, were Thomas Powell, Esq., W. Roe, Esq., H. Robin- son, Esq., and in a most eminent degree James S. Brown, and Samuel Noyes, Esq., who with all the enthusiasm with which his liberal spirit is endowed kept up two bonfires on the end of his dock and continued the firing of cannon from early in the evening till after ten o’clock. John Ledyard, Esq., with his usual promptitude, was most active in the dis- charge of his official duty, and continued till the last at the bonfire ; to him, for his imme- diate compliance with the wishes of the citizens, and Mr. Jonathan Hasbrouck, in grant- ing the use of his ground, are the inhabitants particularly indebted. J. P. DeWint, Esq., of Eishkill Landing, had his residence most brilliantly illuminated, which had a most beau- tiful appearance from the heights on the south of the village. On the mountain south of the village of Canterbury there was a large bonfire early m the evening, and we believe throughout the whole county a general rejoicing has taken place.—Qaz., Nov. 10, 1836.226 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. of 183*7, passed an act enabling the trustees of the village to purchase at par $150,000 of the stock. The subscription was made in accor- dance with the provisions of the act; and on the 10th of January, 1838, the trustees paid their first and last installment of $10,000. The financial reverses of 183*7 prostrated the enterprise; and, although a considerable portion of the section placed under contract in August, 1836, was graded, the work was not continued. However, in 1840, the Erie company having asked the aid of the state, the whole influence of the citizens of Newburgh was exerted to compel that company, as a condition of aid, to construct a branch road to Newburgh.* The effort was unsuccessful—the Erie company received a loan of the credit, of the state to the amount of $3,000,000. The* embarrassment of the Erie company culminated in 1842, and its affairs were placed in the hands of assignees. In 1845, the com- pany having again applied to the legislature for aid, the citizens of Newburgh again, and this time with success, pressed the proposi- tion for a branch road. Their efforts led to a conference with the Erie company, which resulted in the submission of bills to the legis- lature—the first releasing the company from the payment of the $3,000,000 loan, on condition that a bona fide subscription to that amount should be secured within eighteen months; the second, re- quiring the company to construct a branch to Newburgh within six years after the passage of the act. To more certainly secure the latter, a written agreement was made, on the 19th of March, between the directors of the Hudson and Delaware company and the direc- tors of the Erie company by which the former conveyed to the latter “ all the grants, lands, immunities, franchises, improvements, rights, privileges, maps and charts, and all of the real and personal estate of every .kind whatsoever belonging” to that company under and by virtue of its charter, in consideration of the sum of not less than forty thousand dollars; the Erie company agreeing as a further con- sideration, that on the passage of the bill then before the legislature authorizing the company to construct a branch road to Newburgh, and also the bill releasing the company from the payment of the three millions loaned to it by the state, that then, upon the bona fide sub- * At a meeting of the citizens of Newburgh, held March 4th, 1840,—Moses H. Belknap, president, and Solomon Tuthill, clerk,—it was Resolved, That if the legislature shall grant further aid to the New York and Erie rail- road company by any former or future law, to be passed for that purpose—in such case the expenditure thereof shall be made under the more immediate supervision of the state— and upon the middle and western Sections of said road, where the same would connect with works already constructed, such as the Delaware and Hudson, the Chenango and Chemung canals, and the Ithaca and Owego railroad, and yield an immediate profit, which cannot be effected by constructing the eastern end of said road in the first place, as is now being done. Resolved, That no such further aid be granted, unless it be accompanied by legislative provision for the construction of a branch of said road terminating at Newburgh.RAILROAD ENTERPRISES. 227 scription of the Hudson and Delaware company of one hundred thou- sand dollars to the capital stock of the Erie company, the latter would construct the branch to Newburgh and issue to the Hudson and Delaware company stock to the amount of $140,000. On the pay- ment of twenty-five per cent, of the subscription of $100,000, “the same together with a sum equal to twice that amount” to be fur- nished by the Erie company, was to be “ actually expended” upon the branch “simultaneously with and as rapidly” as that company should progress with its main line; and this ratio of payments and expendi- tures was to continue until $800,000 was expended. In case that sum did not complete the branch, then further subscriptions, by the Hud- son and Delaware company, if made, should “be immediately applied to the construction of said branch and the putting of the same in operation.” The interests of the roads being thus harmonized, the bills referred to were passed by the legislature on the 14th of May following. The stock subscription required from the Hudson and Delaware company under the agreement was soon raised, and $15,000 in addition—in all $115,000. The following are the names of the subscribers, and the number of shares taken by each, as nearly as can be ascertained: Atwood, William Shs. 1 Agnew, William 25 Barclay, David H. * 5 Belknap, A. & M. H. 5 Betts, Frederick J. 20 Belknap, Aaron 10 Beveridge, J. & Co. 100 Brennan, Patrick 5 Bennett, Hiram 10 Brown, John W. 5 Buckingham, B. F. 2 Buchanan, H. P. 2 Bouton, Lewis S. 5 Barker, John 3 Chambers, James 15 Chambers, John 5 Calyer, Daniel K. 2 Crawford, David 50 Crawford, Mailler & Co., 50 Cleary, William 3 Cornwell, George 5 Corwin, Halsey & Co., 8 Clugston, John 3 DeWint, John P. 100 DeGroff, James 3 DuBois, Nathaniel 20 Falls, Hiram 3 Farrington, Daniel 20 Felter, Theron 2 Fowler, Jacob V. B. 5 Fowler, M. V. B. 5 Gardner, Silas D. 2 Gerard, Franklin 3 Gowdey, James 1 Gorham, John B. 3 Hasbrouck, Wm. C. 5 Harris, John 10 Halsey, Walter 10 Hasbrouck, Eli 5 Halstead & Co. 5 Hathaway, Odell S. 10 Hawkins, Wm. H. 1 Horton & McCamly, 10 Johnes, Edward B. 10 Kemp, Bobert D. 3 Kernochan, Joseph 50 Lander, Tobias D. 2 Little, John 2 Little, Thomas 2 Mecklem, George 5 Miller, C. B. 15 Monell, John J. 5 Moffat, D. H. 5 Niven, T. M. 10 Nicoll, Wm. C. 1 Oakley, Isaac K. 4 Powell, Thos. & Co., 250 Purdy, Henry L. 2 Bobinson, Capt. Henry 50 Stanton & Clark, 3 Sneed, George 3 Spier & Wilson, 2 Smith, Corns. C. 10 Smith, Wm. P. C. 5 Smith & Booth, 5 Smith, Orville M. 3 Storm, Garret 50 Tyler, Benjamin 10 Yan Nort, Benj. W. 10 Weed, Harvey 50 Williams, Samuel 3 Walsh, Henry 5 Zabriskie, A. G. 3 Wiley, John 5 Waugh, Jas S. 2 Whited, J. J. & Co., 3 On the fulfillment of this stock subscription by the citizens of New- burgh, it was their prerogative to be represented in the board of the Erie company by a local director, and Homer Kamsdell was accord- ingly nominated by the subscribers and elected as such director, in the summer of 1845. The first contracts made by the Erie company, upon its reorganization under the amended act of 1845, were those for constructing the Newburgh branch, and that part of the main line228 HISTOBY OF NEWBURGH. between Middletown and Otisville. The work was carried forward under the agreement until in 1847, when, by reason of enormous ex- penditures upon the main line between Otisville and Binghamton, and when only about $115,000 (the amount subscribed at Newburgh) had been expended upon the branch, the Erie company was so pressed for money that a suspension of the work upon the branch was deemed imperative. To prevent this, and to bridge over the necessities of the hour, the Newburgh director agreed to negotiate the acceptances of the .company for each successive monthly estimate until January, 1849, at which time all were to mature. During this, time the further sum of $180,000 was expended upon the branch. The opening of the main line of the Erie to Binghamton, on the 27th of December, 1848, was attended by a cost far exceeding the estimates, and the finances of the company were correspondingly embarrassed; added to this were heavy drains for work then being vigorously pushed upon the Susquehanna division, so that the direc- tory, ill January, 1849, deemed themselves forced to discontinue the expenditures upon the branch. At this juncture the Newburgh direc- tor proposed to raise the sum of $145,000 upon the acceptances of the company, to mature May, 1851, and to pay the same to the company, provided responsible parties in Newburgh would endorse the accept- ances, and also provided the company would execute a mortgage upon the branch as security for the amount. In view of the compul- sory clause of the act of 1845, releasing the company from the pay- ment of the $8,000,000 loan, conditioned upon finishing the road to Dunkirk and also the Newburgh branch, in May, 1851, and as a financial measure, the board of directors accepted the proposition and adopted the following preamble and.resolution: At a meeting of the directors of the New York and Erie Railroad Company, the following preamble and resolution were unanimously adopted (January 10th, 1819): * “Whereas, there has already been expended upon the Newburgh branch, in conformity to agreement, about the sum of two hundred and forty-five thousand dollars, which, to- gether with the sums necessary to complete the present contracts, say twenty thousand dollars, Will nearly make up the amount required to be advanced by this company toward the construction of said branch road, as per agreement of 19th March, 1815; and whereas, the inhabitants of Newburgh, in order to secure the completion of the said road by the first day of September next, propose to advance upon the acceptances of this company $115,000 for that purpose: and whereas, upon the extension of the main line of our road to Elmira, if not earlier, said branch road will be of great value if completed; therefore “Resolved, that the superintending engineer upon the Newburgh branch is hereby authorized to draw upon the treasurer of this company in sums not less than $500 to an amount on the aggregate of one hundred and forty-five thousand dollars, which drafts shall be payable m May, 1851 (the time prescribed by the law of this state for the com- pletion of said branch road), and bear interest at seven per cent, per annum payable half yearly; and that Homer Ramsdell be authorized to procure the money upon said accep- tances and deposit it with the treasurer to be applied toward the purchase of iron rails and completion of said branch road as aforesaid; and that the president is hereby author- ized to issue such orders as shall be necessary to carry out the intention of the foregoing preamble and resolution.” A true copy, NATHANIEL MARSH, Secy. “In consideration of and in conformity to” this preamble and resolution, the following persons made written agreement, on the.HA ILBOAD ENTERPRISES. 229 15th January, 1849, to endorse the acceptances of the Erie company for the sums set opposite their names: T. Powell & Co., $4:5,000 J. Beveridge & Co., 25,000 John P. DeWint, 25,000 B. Carpenter & Co., 10,000 Adam Lilburn, 1,000 Crawford, Mailler & Co., 20,000 J. Y.B. Fowler & Co., 1,000 F. Gerard and Jas. DeGroff, 1,000 Wm. C. Hasbrouck, 1,000 N. Reeve, 1,000 Corns. C. Smith, 1,000 Stanton, Clark & Co., 1,000 Benj. Tyler, 1,000 Daniel Farrington, A. & M. H. Belknap, Jno. J. Monell, Corwin, Halsey & Co., Richard C. Smith, George Mecklem, Spier & Wilson, Enoch Carter, Odell S. Hathaway, Christopher B. Miller, Aaron B. Belknap, $1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 3.000 2.000 1,000 $145,500 These acceptances were also all endorsed by Thomas Powell & Co. On the 23d of February following, Messrs. Powell, Ramsdell & Co. and J. Beveridge & Co. purchased 2,000 tons of railroad iron, then in in the hands of Davis, Brooks & Co., at $40 per ton and duties there- on, for which the notes of Powell & Co. were given for $55,000, and the notes of Beveridge & Co. for $23,000. In addition to the iron, Homer Ramsdell purchased the depot grounds—embracing the river front between the Whaling company’s dock and the north line of Western Avenue, and also a lot south of the dock of John W. Wells, fronting 165 feet on Water street and the river—paying for the same $20,000. The property of John W. Wells, 91 feet on the river, with a quit claim to one half of Western Avenue, was condemned and taken on the award of commissioners at $40,000. On settlement in June, it was found that Powell & Co. were at that time, through en- dorsements, acceptances, and advances, responsible for $202,219. The capital thus furnished completed the branch, and on the 9th of Janu- ary, 1850, its opening was celebrated with appropriate festivities. ' The first depot building of the branch was erected a short distance south of those now occupied. The present buildings were erected by Mr. Ramsdell in 1870, and leased by him, together with the dock (for- merly the Whaliug company’s wharf), to the Erie company, the com- pany having the option to purchase them and the land upon which they are located. The original track of the road was laid in Front street as far north as Fifth. It was once passed over, and then abandoned by common consent; its rails remain bedded under the pavement. The old Delaware and Hudson company left behind, as the only memorials of its existence, a-partly graded track, and the stock sub- scription of the village of Newburgh ($10,000), upon the debt for which the interest has been annually paid since 1838. The details of its history, as well as those of the construction of the branch, now serve as monuments to the memory of those who were its projectors and supporters. The effort of 1837 is now an accomplished fact: the coal mines of Pennsylvania are in connection with Newburgh by rail;230 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. but the advantages of the earlier enterprise passed away, to a very large extent, with its opportunity. WARWICK VALLEY RAILROAD. Although not strictly a Newburgh enterprise, the Warwick Valley railroad—constructed in part by Newburgh capital and constituting a portion of the proposed line extending from the Delaware (Water Gap) to a connection with the Newburgh branch at Chester—miters into intimate relation with the history of its railroad enterprises. Immediately following the completion of the Newburgh branch, the project of its extension to the Delaware was considered, and a survey and maps made; but nothing further was accomplished. In 1859, Mr. Grinnell Burt, and other residents of Warwick, practically revived the project by organizing the “ Warwick Valley Railroad Company” under the following board of directors: Grinnell Burt, John Ruther- ford, Thomas B. DeKay, Ezra Sanford, James B. Wheeler, Milton McEwen, James Burt, John H. Brown, John L. Welling, Wm. Herrick, James P. Houston, and Nathan R. Wheeler. On organization the directors elected Grinnell Burt, president; Milton McEwen vice presi- dent; James B. Wheeler, treasurer; Wm. Herrick, secretary. The capital stock was $100,000, of which Newburgh furnished $10;500. When the road was completed the bonded and floating debt amounted to a little over $100,000, forty per cent, of which has since been paid out of the earnings of the road, and a surplus of an equal amount has been expended to extend the road to the New Jersey state line. In consideration of these payments and to create a surplus fund, a stock dividend of one hundred per cent, was declared to the stock- holders in 1861. Regular annual dividends of seven per cent, have been paid from the earnings of the road, showing that, aside from the advantages which it has conferred upon the district which it traverses, it has been a pecuniary success. Mr. Grinnell Burt has been the president and superintendent since the organization of the company. John L. Welling has served for many years as secretary and treas- urer. Robert A. Forsyth and Wm. L. F. Warren, of Newburgh, were early members of the board of directors, and subsequently Homer Ramsdell. On the death of Mr. Forsyth, Isaac C. Chapman was elected his successor. NEWBURGH AND NEW YORK RAILROAD. The Newburgh and New York railroad company was organized in the city of New York, December 20tli, 1864—Samuel Marsh, Daniel Drew, John Arnot, Isaac N. Phelps, Robert H. Burdell, Dudley S. Gregory, Ambrose S. Murray, J. C. Bancroft Davis, H. L. Pierson, Alexander S. Diven, Thomas W. Gale, John J. Monell, Thomas H. Bate, directors; J. C. Bancroft Davis, president; Horatio N. Otis, sec-RAILROAD ENTERPRISES. 231 retary. The capital stock was fixed at $500,000, of which over $1000 per mile was immediately subscribed and paid up. The project was based on a proposition for a west shore road from New York to Albany, which, by its construction, would only lack sixty miles of. completion. Aside from the directors named, who subscribed ten shares ($100) each, George Clark, and Enoch Carter, of Newburgh, subscribed one share each; F. A. DeWint of Fishkill, one; and John Hilton, H. N. Otis, Chas. Minot, L. E. Tillotson, J. W. Guppy, Wm. R. Barr, N. Finch, E. W. Brown, and J. D. White, of New York, each one. The road being less than fifteen miles in length, the number of directors was reduced to seven, in conformity with the general rail- road law, in December, 1861, when John S. Eldridge, Jay Gould, J. C. B. Davis, Daniel Drew, A. S. Diven, Henry Thompson, and Homer Ramsdell, were elected. On the 1st of August, 1868, Mr. Ramsdell was elected president. He resigned July 1, 1869, and James Fisk, Jr., was elected. The line was surveyed by John W. Houston, engi- neer; the contract for construction was awarded to Peter Ward and 'William Leary, of Newburgh, Aug. 1, 1868, and the work completed Sept. 1,1869. The road was subsequently leased to the Erie company, that company supplying the capital required for its construction. The understood willingness of the company to second any effort to extend the connections of the road, gave rise to what have been called “ the Newburgh paper railroads,” the first of which, the NEWBURGH AND WALLKILL VALLEY RAILROAD, took the form of a company to construct a road from Newburgh to Walden, connecting at Vail's Gate with the Erie branch and with the Newburgh and New York road. The company was organized in the winter of 1861-'68 by the election of directors and officers. In May following (May 9), the legislature passed an act making it lawful “for the common council of.the city of Newburgh to borrow, on the faith and credit of said city, the sum of three hundred and fifty thousand dollars ” to aid in the construction of the road, and to issue the bonds of the city therefor—on condition that the consent should first be obtained, in writing, of a majority of the tax payers of the city, who should also own or ^represent more than one half of the tax- able real and personal property of the city. At the time the project was undertaken, the disposition of the Newburgh and New York company to second the enterprise was not generally understood as a tangible agreement, and this fact, coupled with an expressed oppo- sition to the Vail’s Gate route, on the part of several leading citizens, led to a failure in obtaining the consent required to bond the city, and necessarily to a suspension of the further prosecution of the un- dertaking.232 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. NEWBURGH AND MIDLAND RAILROAD. The proposition to construct a road from the vicinity of West New- burgh to Walden and thence to Fair Oaks, there to connect with the Midland, was the outgrowth of the effort on behalf of the Newburgh and Wallkill Valley road, and took definite form in the organization of the “Newburgh and Midland Railway Company”—George Clark, president; Odell S. Hathaway, vice president; Alfred Post, treasurer; John Dales, secretary; George Clark, Abram S. Cassedy, A. T. Rand, Bradbury C. Bartlett, Odell S. Hathaway, Seth M. Capron, David Moore, James W. Taylor, Alfred Post, William R. Brown, William J. Roe, Jr., Lewis M. Smith, Wm. 0. Mailler, directors. To build this road effort was made to bond the city for $500,000, under the general act authorizing municipal corporations to aid in the construction of railroads. What was presumed to be the consent of a majority of the tax payers, and also of a majority of the taxable property of the city, was obtained. On examination of the list before Hon. Thomas George, county judge, it was held by him that while the petition for consent to bond was signed by a majority of the tax payers, the signatures did not represent a majority of the taxable property of the city—$555,099 of the amount being held by execu- tors, administrators, etc., whose right to thus represent the trusts which they held, was denied. An appeal was taken to the supreme court, which, at general term, January, 18*72, affirmed the decision of Judge George—Justices Tappen and Gilbert concurring, Justice Bar- nard dissenting. This decision ended the undertaking, and with it the last of the Newburgh railroad enterprises. - BANK OF NEWBURGH. The Bank of Newburgh was incorporated by act of the legislature, passed March 22, 1811, on the petition of Jacob Powell, John McAulay, Chancy Belknap and Jonathan Fisk.* The capital named was $120,- 000, in shares of $50 each; and the state reserved the right to sub- scribe to the stock any amount not exceeding one thousand shares. The first directors were: Isaac Belknap, Jr., Jacob Powell, Selah Reeve, Chancy Belknap, Freegift Tuthill, Leonard Carpenter, Sami. S. Seward, Jonathan Hedges, Francis Crawford, James Hamilton, John D. Lawson, and Richard Trimble, elected by the stockholders; and William Ross and Jonathan Fisk appointed on the part of the state. The stock was all taken soon after the passage of the act of incorporation; and on the 15th June, the corner-stone of the pres- —---------------:-------- % * Notice is hereby given, that the subscribers and others, intend to petition the legisla- ture of this state, at its next session, tor a law of incorporation to establish a bank in the village of Newburgh, in the county of Orange, the capital stock to consist of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars. Dated1, Newburgh, January 1st, 1811. CHANCY BELKNAP, JACOB POWELL, JONATHAN FISK, JOHN McAULAY,BANKING INSTITUTIONS. 233 ent banking1 house was laid.* The building was completed and the bank was opened for business on the 9th of September. The charter of 1811 continued until 1830, when the stock held by the state was withdrawn, the bank was reorganized under the safety fund law, and the capital increased to $140,000. In 1851, the capital was further increased to $200,000, when the bank was reorganized under the general banking law. In September, 1852, the capital was increased to $300,000. j* The first president of the bank was Isaac Belknap, Jr., and the first cashier, John S. Hunn. Wm. Walsh succeeded Mr. Belknap in 1821, and served until his death in 1839, when John Chambers was elected. Mr. Chambers served until his death in 1854, when George W. Kerr was elected. Mr. Hunn was succeeded in the cashiership by Freder- ick W. Farnum; Mr. Farnum by Wm. M. Vermilyea; Mr. Vermilyea J by Levi Dodge; Mr. Dodge, in 1836, by George W. Kerr; and Mr. Kerr, in 1854, by Francis Scott. On the 5th of July, 1864, the bank was organized as a national bank—George W. Kerr, president, and John J. S. McCroskery, cashier—and its capital raised to $800,000. BRANCH BANK OF NEWBURGH. In 1818, the directors of the Bank of Newburgh determined to es- tablish a branch at Ithaca; the arrangements for which were perfected and the institution went into operation on the 15th of February, 1820, under the following officers: Luther Gore, president; Charles W. Con- nor, cashier; Benj. Johnson, Joseph Benjamin, Levi Leonard, Calvin Burr, Herman Camp, and Charles A. Morrell, directors. The branch continued in operation until 1830, when, on the expiration of the old charter, it was discontinued. HIGHLAND BANK. . In 1833, application was made to the legislature to incorporate the Highland Bank; but the bill was lost in the senate. This result was followed by a meeting of citizens at the Mansion House, April 20, 1833, “ to ta,ke into consideration such measures as might be deemed necessary to obtain an increase of the banking capital of Newburgh.” Of this meeting Selah Reeve was chosen president; Daniel Farring- ton and Robert Lawson, vice presidents; and Abraham M. Smith and Aaron Belknap, secretaries. After the passage of a resolution regret- * On Saturday, June 15th, 1811, the president and directors of the Bank of Newburgh, assisted by the master mason, laid the corner-stone of the banking house, in Water street. The building is to be of brick, thirty feet front, forty-six deep, three stories high, and finished in a handsome style.—Index. f The increase of the capital of the bank, here referred to, was made by the sale by auction of the stock, on Tuesday, Sept. 2d, 1852. The increase was mainly taken by the old stockholders, and yielded a premium of $14,130.75. ^ Mr. Vermilyea tendered his resignation for the purpose of accepting the appointment of cashier of the Merchant’s Exchange Bank of New York, which commenced business in September, 1831,234 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ting the defeat of the bill, committees were appointed to renew and circulate petitions to the next legislatyre. The second application was successful; the charter passed the legislature April 26, 1834.* The charter capital of the bank was $200,000. Nathaniel Jones, Egbert Jansen, Robert Fowler, Nathl. P. Hill, John Forsyth, James Belknap, Aaron Noyes, Noah Mathewson, and Christopher Reeve were appointed commissioners to receive stock subscriptions. In a few weeks nearly double the capital required was subscribed, and a pro rata distribution of the stock became necessary. The bank was organized on the 21st of July, 1834, under the fol- lowing officers: Directors—Gilbert 0. Fowler, Samuel Williams, Jack- son Oakley, Thomas Powell, Charles Borland, Jr., Daniel Farrington, Benj. H. Mace, James Belknap, Benj. Carpenter, Nathl. Jones, Abm. Vail, Robert Fowler. Gilbert 0. Fowler, president, and James Belk- nap, cashier. Mr. Belknap subsequently resigned, and Thos. C. Ring was elected. Mr. Ring resigned in 1838, and Robert Burnett held the office until his death in 1840, when (May 10) Alfred Post was elected. Mr. Fowler served as president until his death, when George Cornwell was elected. On the death of Mr. Cornwell (Nov. 1861), Mr. Post was elected president and M. C. Belknap, cashier. Directors in 1861: Alfred Post, John W. Brown, David Moore, Ed. R. Johnes, Jas. W. Taylor, Peter V, B. Fowler, Robt. Denniston, Thaddeus Hait, John Lomas, Walter S. Vail, George A. Elliott. The capital of the bank was increased to $350,000 ($100,000 from surplus and $50,000 new stock), Jan. 1, 1865. It was organized as a national bank, April 22, 1865, and its capital increased to $450,000. POWELL BANK. The Powell Bank was organized December 12, 1838, as an associated bank—with a capital of $135,000. The first directors and officers were: Directors—Thos. Powell, Samuel Williams, Daniel Farrington, Benj. Carpenter, Charles Halstead, Homer Ramsdell, Wm. L. F. Warren. Thomas Powell, president; Sami. Williams, vice president; Thos. C. Ring, cashier; Nathaniel R. Belknap, teller. The capital stock was held by Hiram Bennett, A. & M. H. Belknap, Benj. Carpenter & Co., Daniel Farrington, A. P. Johnes, H. Ramsdell, Roe & Darby, Thos. Powell, George Sneed, and Samuel Williams. In January, 1843, the stockholders, with the exception of' Thos. Powell and Homer Ramsdell, withdrew their stock, and the institution became an individual bank, with a capital of $110,000,—Thos. Powell, president; Homer Ramsdell, vice president; and T. C. Ring, cashier. Messrs. Powell and Ramsdell subsequently increased the capital to $115,000. The bank was discontinued in 1851.f * Ante p. 193, f Ante p. 194,196.BANKING INSTITUTIONS. 235 QUASSAICK BANK. The organization of the Quassaick Bank was based on the assumed necessity for a larger banking capital to accommodate the business of the village. The directors of the Bank of Newburgh endeavored to supply this want by increasing the capital stock of that institution $100,000; but this addition proved inadequate to the demand. On Thursday evening, September 4th, 1851, a meeting of citizens was held at the Orange Hotel for the purpose of considering the subject. David Crawford was chosen chairman, and 0. M. Smith secretary. After addresses by Wrn. Fullerton, W. E. Warren, S. W. Eager, T. M. Niven, and others, a committee was appointed to name, suitable per- sons for directors, and also to suggest a title for the institution. On the report of this committee, a board of directors was nominated, and “The Quassaick Bank,” adopted as the title. On the 31st of March, 1852, the bank was formally organized by the adoption of articles of association, and commenced business with a capital of $130,000 in the spring of that year. The first officers were: Directors—E. W. Farrington, J. I. Crawford, I. R. Carpenter, Asa Sterling, Isaiah Townsend, Charles U. Cushman, John Jamison, W. K. Mailler, Jas. Patton, John J. Monell. A vacancy in the board was filled, at the ensuing election in May, by the election of David Moore. At the organization of the bank E. W. Farrington was chosen president; Jonathan N, Weed, cashier, and W. H. Gerard, teller. D. Gillis Leonard succeeded Mr. Farrington in May, 1862, and Odell S. Hathaway was elected in September, 1864, to fill the vacancy occa- sioned by the death of Mr. Leonard in May of that year. James N. Dickey was elected teller in 1863. The capital of the bank was in- creased to $200,000, Sept. 1852; and to $300,000, March, 1854. It was organized as a national bank June 3, 1865, the capital remain- ing unchanged. NEWBURGH SAVINGS BANK. By act of the legislature passed April 13, 1852, E. W. Farrington, John J. Monell, Charles U. Cushman, Robert L. Case, Robert A. For- syth, Richard A. Southwick, Odell S. Hathaway, Gilbert C. Monell, David H. Barclay, Adam Lilburn, Sami. W. Eager, Corns. C. Smith, Robert Sterling, Robert D. Kemp, Charles Drake, David Moore, John H. Waters, James I. Crawford, James Patton, Wm. K. Mailler, Benj. Carpenter, T. M. Niven, and their successors, were constituted “a body corporate and politic, by the name of The Newburgh Savings Bank.” The bank commenced business January 1, 1853, with the fol- lowing officers, viz: Robert L. Case, president; 0. S. Hathaway and E. W. Farrington, vice presidents; Chaides U. Cushman, secretary and treasurer. In 1854, E. W. Farrington was elected president; Charles236 HISTORY OR NEWBURGH. Halstead, Jr., treasurer; G. C. Monell, secretary. In 1858, Daniel B. St. John, president; Thos. C. Ring, treasurer; J. R.Wiltsie, secretary. These officers were continued until 1872, when the Rev. John Forsyth was elected president. He was succeeded by J. DeWitt Walsh, who served until January, 1873, when Mr. St. John was reelect- ed, and Mr. Ring entered upon his seventeenth year as treas- urer. The deposits on the 1st July, 1859, were $124,000; July 1st, 1875, $2,467,700. In the summer of 1866, the directors commenced the erec- tion of the building now occu- pied by the bank—Vaux, With- ers & Co., architects; Franklin Gerard, mason ; McClung & Deyo, carpenters. It was com- pleted in 1868, and occupied by the bank in October of that year. Its cost was about $130,000, which was paid from the earnings of the bank. BANK SUSPENSIONS. The Bank of Newburgh and the Highland Bank suspended specie payments May 12, 1837. On the morning of that day, the directors and officers held a meeting and passed the following among other resolutions: “Resolved, That during the suspension of specie payments by the New York city banks, it will be prudent and necessary for the village banks to retain their specie for the use of the town and county, to be used in the ordinary business of the county. “ Resolved, That the banks will, therefore, for the present, suspend paying specie for the redemption of their bills—other than such as may be offered by our citizens to obtain small sums for the prosecution of their accustomed business.” At 11 o’clock, the same day, a meeting of citizens was held at the Orange Hotel—John Ledyard, chairman; Christopher Reeve and David Sands, secretaries. After reading the resolutions adopted by the banks, their course was approved. In consequence of this action, the banks were able to supply specie to the public during the whole of the period of suspension. On the 1st of September, 1837, the Bank of Newburgh held $23,921 in specie, and the Highland Bank $15,450. The suspensions of 1857, were made in a similar manner. While amply prepared to redeem their circula- tion in gold and silver, the suspension of New York city banks ren- dered the same course necessary on the part of those of Newburgh. The suspension of specie payments growing out of the war of theINCORPORATED COMPANIES. 237 rebellion practically began on the 30th of December, 1861, when the New York city banks suspended, and has continued since that time, under the substitution for gold and silver of an irredeemable national currency. NEWBURGH WHALING COMPANY. The precise date of the organization of this company cannot now be ascertained, but the first entry of stock was made on the 31st De- cember, 1831. On the 24th of January, 1832, the legislature passed an act incorporating the company, by the terms of which “ William Roe, John P. DeWint, Abraham M. Smith, John Harris, Benoni H. Howell, Samuel Williams, Benj. Carpenter, Christopher Reeve and Augustus'F. Schofield,’7 and such others as were then or might there- after be associated with them, were empowered to engage “ in the whale fishery in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and elsewhere, and in the manufacture of oil and spermaceti candles.” The capital stock was fixed at $200,000 in shares of $50; but the company was author- ized to commence business as soon as $50,000 should be subscribed and paid in. The persons named in the act were to be the first direc- tors of the company, and were also to act as commissioners to re- ceive subscriptions to the stock. Directors were to be elected on the first Tuesday in January of each year; the company authorized to purchase and hold real estate to an amount not exceeding twenty-five thousand dollars, and to have and perform all the rights and privi- leges of an incorporated company, with the only restriction that “ no foreigner” should “ever be a stockholder, or anywise interested in said company.” * The company was immediately organized under this act, and William Roe appointed president; Aaron Belknap, secretary, and Abraham M. Smith, agent. The books were opened for subscriptions and $109,000, or 2186 shares, of the capital stock taken. On the 1st of April, the. company purchased the ship Portland, for $15,250; in August, the ship Russell, for $14,500, and in May following, the ship Illinois, for $12,000. During the same year, they also erected a large store-house on Water street, near First street, and a commodious wharf. The ships purchased were fitted out and made two voyages each. The Portland was under command of Capt. Cook; the Russell, under Capt. Brock; and the Illinois, first voyage, Capt. Leonard—second voyage, Capt. Merchant. The business of the company was continued until 1837. In 1834, * The act encountered considerable opposition in the assembly, as appears from the debate on the 18th January. Mr. King, in reply to Mr. Myers, said, that “the reason why an act of incorporation was asked for, in this instance, was because the present stock company in Newburgh was unable in any other way, to collect the necessary capital for the prosecution of their business on such a scale as they could wish, or as would be advan- tageous to the company.”— Telegraph, Jan. 26, 1832.238 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Charles Ludlow, David W. Bate, John Harris, Edmund Sanxay, Abra- ham M. Smith, Janies G. Clinton, Daniel Farrington, David M. DuBois and John Chambers were chosen directors. In the presidency, John D. Lawson succeeded Mr. Roe in 1833, and Charles Ludlow succeeded Mr. Lawson in 1834. Uriah Lockwood succeeded Mr. Belknap, and James Belknap, Mr. Lockwood, as secretary. The last voyage made was by the ship Portland, Capt. Cook, which arrived in New York in March, 1831, with 2100 barrels whale oil, 350 barrels sperm oil, and 19,000 pounds of bone. The cargo sold for about $40,000. The enterprise, however, failed to yield the profit anticipated and was abandoned. Receivers were appointed, the ships and other prop- erty sold, and the stockholders paid back their original subscriptions with the addition of a small dividend. The existence of the company ceased in 1840; and in 1846, its books, with the exception of an im- perfect day-book, were destroyed by the fire which consumed the store of Daniel Farrington, in which they were deposited.* NEWBURGH STEAM MILLS. In the early part of the year 1844, a stock company was formed for the purpose of erecting mills for the manufacture of cotton goods. The capital agreed upon was $100,000,f and the subscriptions to the stock were completed on the 25th of May. On the 5th of June, the company was formally organized, and John Forsyth, Hiram Bennett, David Crawford, Aaron P. Johnes, Homer Ramsdell, Benjamin Car- penter, Christopher Reeve, Uriah Lockwood, and Daniel Farrington, elected directors; Hiram Bennett, president; Homer Ramsdell, vice president; Daniel Farrington, treasurer; and Uriah Lockwood, secre- tary. On the 12th of June, the directors selected the site and soon after commenced the erection of the necessary buildings.^ The works were completed and the manufacture of cotton commenced in 1845, since which time the mills have continued in operation, and partial time kept during the most trying revulsions. A large portion of the original stockholders have disposed of their interest, and a majority * In addition to this company, an act was passed by the legislature, on the 29th of April, 1833, “to incorporate the North River Whaling Company.” The capital of this company was fixed at $300,000. John Forsyth, Alexander Falls, John Ledyard, James Halstead, Jonathan Hasbrouck, Edmund Sanxay, John W. Knevels, John D. Phillips and William C. Hasbrouck, were named as directors in the act. This company, it is said, owed its origin to Jonathan Hasbrouck. Beyond incorporation, however, nothing was ever done in its name. f $100,000 additional was obtained by loan from H. & D. Parish of New York. $ The trustees of the “Newburgh Steam Mills” held a meeting on Tuesday last to select a site for their cotton factory from the several locations offered. We learn that they unanimously accepted the proposals of Messrs. J. Beveridge & Co., and have taken their lot at the north part of the village on the immediate bank of the Hudson. It is 205 feet in front on Water street and 750 feet on the river. The trustees have secured an advanta- geous site for their works, and obtained the property for the trifling consideration of $3,000—Messrs. Beveridge & Co., in connection with the other holders of real estate in that vicinity, engaging to build a sufficient road on the shore and a suitable wharf for the estab- lishment—Gazette, June 15,1844.supply of Water, 239 of the stock is now held by Thos. Garner. The main building is two hundred and fifty feet long by fifty feet broad, and has five floors beside the basement—one floor being devoted to each of the proces- ses of cotton manufacture. In addition to this building is another ninety by forty feet. NEWBURGH GAS-LIGHT COMPANY. This company was organized in May, 1851, with a capital of $65,000. The following gentlemen composed the first board of direc- tors, viz: Homer Ramsdell, David Crawford, E. W. Farrington, and John J. Monell, of Newburgh, and J. A. Sabaten, of Albany, and S. Sabaten, of Newark, N. J. David Crawford was elected president, and J. J. Monell, secretary and treasurer of the board. Gas was first lighted in the latter part of September, 1852. SUPPLY OF WATER. Prior to 1.811, the village of Newburgh was mainly supplied with water by wells; but, as population increased, it became necessary to procure a supply from other sources. Private enterprise, for a time, relieved the more pressing demand.* In 1840, the board of trustees took the subject in hand, and submitted to the inhabitants a plan for forming a stock association^ which resulted in the incorporation, by * Under date of August 3d, 1803, appears the following advertisement of the first water-works: “ Water.—The proprietor of the works on the tenement formerly the property of Fran- cis Brewster, of this village, hereby informs his neighbors, that water may be had at the works until other arrangements are made, on the following easy terms, to wit—For every 5 pails of water, or less quantity, 5 cents; for each barrel filled at the works, 6 cents. All persons who come to the works for water, will, in future, be soobliging as to call on some of the family, in order that an account may be kept. Prompt payment will be expected at the end of every month. For workmen to drink, who are employed in erecting any building in the town, or such as are at work improving the streets, or other public labor,' water gratis.” t“A meeting of the inhabitants of the village of Newburgh is requested at the house of Edward Howell, in said village, on Saturday next, at 7 o’clock in the afternoon pre- cisely, to devise a suitable plan to supply this village with good and wholesome water for all family purposes, and to supply the engines with water in case of fire. In the meantime the following plan is submitted to their consideration: That the amount of the expense of the proposed measure (estimated not to exceed 3000 dollars) be divided into 600 shares, of five dollars each; that each inhabitant shall be at liberty to subscribe as many shares as he may think fit, not exceeding 20 in number, during the first ten days after opening the subscriptions; that none but inhabitants of the village, or persons holding real estate in the same, shall be permitted to subscribe any shares during the first ten days aforesaid; that subscription books be provided by the Trustees of the village, and the subscriptions be made payable to the Treasurer of the Corporation at such times and in such proportions as the board of trustees may from time to time direct, and emergencies require; but to be appropriated only to the object of the institu- tion; that the purchases of springs and sources of water, and the soil necessary for this purpose be made by the trustees in their corporate capacity, and be held by them and their successors, in trust for the exclusive benefit of the subscribers, their legal representa- tives, or assigns, until the income of the works shall be equal to the amount of the sub- scriptions, and interest after the rate of fourteen per cent, per annum; that the works shall be carried on and when completed be, and always remain, under the sole direction and control of the trustees for the time being, and that they may at all times make and ordain such prudential by-laws and regulations concerning the same, as shall be just and right; and that the whole interest, rights and emoluments of the institution shall be vested in the trustees for the time being, for the use of the inhabitants, when the subscribers shall have received the amount of their subscriptions and interest after the rate of 14 per cent, per annum. By order of the Trustees. G. MONELL, President. Newburgh, June 30,1804.240 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. an act of the legislature, passed March 1th, 1806, of the “Newburgh Aqueduct Association.” Beyond this, however, nothing appears to have been done until 1809, when, on the 21th of March, the legisla- ture passed an act empowering the trustees to procure a supply of water for the use of the village, and for that purpose to enter upon the possession of any springs or streams of water within the corpo- rate bounds; provided, that there should, “in all cases, be left a sufficiency of water in said spring or springs so taken, for the use of the owner of the lands wherein the said spring or springs are situ- ated, and his heirs and their assigns forever;” and further, that com- pensation should be made for the property so taken. Two hundred and fifty dollars were to be raised annually by tax to meet the expen- ses incurred, and the act of 1806 was repealed. The sum named in this act proved to be insufficient, and no further proceedings were had until 1812, when a meeting of the citizens was held (Feb. 29), who sanctioned the levying of a higher tax, by the trustees; but the latter regarded a compliance with the wishes of the former as illegal, and directed the raising of only the amount specified. This was the first water tax levied. In May, 1818, the trustees determined to contract with Jonathan Hasbrouck, the owner of Cold Spring, and Walter Case and Jacob Powell were appointed a committee for that purpose. No arrange- ment, however, was made with Mr. Hasbrouck, and the subject rested until the 20th of June, 1814, when the trustees “Resolved, That we will proceed with all convenient speed to supply the inhabitants of the village of Newburgh with pure and wholesome water;” and as Water street was about to be paved, that water-logs be laid before that w’ork was done. In 1815, the difficulties under which the trus- tees labored were partially removed by an amendment to the charter of the village by which two thousand dollars could be raised annually by tax, for contingent expenses and for the introduction of water. An effort was then made to purchase a spring owned by Mr. Mande- vill, late the property of Jno. J. Monell; but it was not successful. Nothing further was done till 1816, when the trustees appointed a committee to examine the water lots of Jacob Ritchie, in the vicinity of Grand and Third streets, for the purpose of ascertaining the extent of the supply which could be obtained from that source. Experi- ments were made by this committee, who subsequently reported that the yield was not sufficient. The proposition to take the Cold Spring was then renewed, and an agreement was made with Mr. Hasbrouck for that purpose. The water was to be taken from a “ pen-stock,” which had been erected on Liberty street for supplying the brewery of Robert Dunlop, and conveyed “ from thence down Ann street toSUPPLY OF WATER. 241 Colden street, thence through Colden and Water streets as far. north as the store of Harris & Miller.” * * At this stage of the proceedings, the court of chancery (Aug. 26, 1816), on the application of George Gardner, through whose lands the outlet of the spring passed, granted an order restraining the trustees from further action, as, under the act of 1809, they were required to leave sufficient water in the spring for the use of those interested in it as a source of private supply. The trustees referred the subject to their counsel, Mr. Henry, of Albany, who, after examining the act, advised them that he considered it inexpedient to make a motion to dissolve the injunction. The trustees then agreed (Jan. 10, 1811,) to ask the legislature to “ repeal the act of 1809, and substitute, in lieu thereof, a law for the same purpose based upon more just and consti- tutional principles as to the mode and extent of contracting* for or taking the water to be introduced into the village.” This action was approved by the citizens, at a public meeting held on the 29th of March, and the act applied for passed the legislature on the 1th of April. This act authorized the trustees to take, for the use of the village, such sources of supply as they might deem necessary. In case of disagreement with the owners of the property so taken, the subject of damages was to be referred to Wm. Thompson, Daniel C. Verplanck and Abm. H. Schenck, who should fix the amounts to be paid. The trustees immediately made application to Jonathan and Eli Hasbrouck, George Gardner, and Patrick McGahey (the guardian of the heirs of Charles Mackin), for the sale of their several rights in the Cold Spring. Jonathan Hasbrouck demanded $10,000; Eli Has- brouck, $5,000, Geo. Gardner, $5,000, and the heirs of Charles Mackin, $500. The trustees regarding the sums as altogether too large, ap- plied to the commissioners named in the act, who awarded to Jona- than Hasbrouck, $2,000; to Eli Hasbrouck, $100; to Geo. Gardner, $1,500, and to the Mackin heirs, $50. The award was accepted by the trustees, and the several sums paid. The deed from Jonathan Hasbrouck, however, was made subject to a previous contract with Robert Dunlop, then held by James Law, for supplying his brewery with water, f The construction of the works was resumed, and, * “ Resolved, That a committee be appointed to contract with Jonathan and Eli Has- brouck for the right of entering their pen-stock, which contains the water from the Cold Spring, with an inch auger, and to agree with them for the quantity of water to fill said hole for the purpose of supplying the village with water, for the term of seven years or longer; and that Erancis Crawford, Jonathan Carter and John Anderson, Jr., be that com- mittee.”—Minutes, July 6, 1816. “ Proposals for digging the ditch for the logs of the aqueduct by the rod, from the place contemplated in the contract with the Messrs. Hasbrouck, read. Resolved, That the pro- posals of William Hill be accepted.”—Minutes, July 13,1816. • ‘ Resolved, That a contract be made with Mr. J. Gilcrist for preparing and laying down water logs.”—Minutes, July 15,1816. f A release was subsequently obtained from J. Beveridge & Co., for the sum of $2,000. 016242 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. in addition to those already named, logs were ordered laid through Smith and Liberty streets. In 1819, the legislature passed an act enabling the trustees to fund the water debt, then amounting to $5,000.* In 1821, a larger supply of water being deemed necessary, the trustees purchased theJ Ritchie lots, on Grand street, from John Ledyard, for the sum of $450; and, in 1829, sold the property, with the exception of the spring,f for $4,115. Subsequently, an additional source of supply was found on the lands of Wm. P. C. Smith, and a reservoir built near the residence of the late Rev. Doct. Johnston. Such—with the addition of several large reservoirs—were the New- burgh water works prior to the introduction of a supply from the Little Pond. In regard to this source, it may be remarked, that the proposition to secure it was first made in 1885, and was renewed, in various forms, until its final adoption in 1852. To trace the several plans which were, from time to time, submitted to the public on the subject, is unnecessary. It is sufficient to say, that after a full exami- nation of the Powellton Springs, the Gidneytown Creek, and the Little Pond, the people of the village almost unanimously approved the latter as a source of supply; and, in March, 1852, an act appointing com- missioners for the purpose of constructing the works, was passed by the legislature.^ In accordance with the terms of this act, on the report of the commissioners, an election was held (Nov. 15, 1852), when eight hundred and twenty-one ballots were cast for, and sixteen against, the plan of supplying the village with water from the Little Pond. The works were put under contract in 1853, and $98,916.91 were expended by the commissioners. In addition to this sum, the trustees expended in 1852, $950.16; in 1854, $1,001.81; in 1855, $2,118.60; in 1856, $150.16; in 1851, $1,646.88; in 1858, $4,196.01; in 1859, $1,541.36; and from March 1st, of the latter year, until Jan- uary 1st, 1860, about, $2,000—making a total of $115,448.15. The act, however, contemplated an outlay of only $100,000, for which sum bonds were issued. The works have been materially enlarged since the introduction of the supply, viz: In 1861, by the connection of Silver Creek with * The reason assigned in the petition to the legislature for the passage of this law, was, that “the general pecuniary embarrassment ” of the citizens rendered it “ extremely op- pressive to raise the money by tax,” as required by the law under which the debt had been created. The original debt, however, was subsequently largely increased by expen- ditures for other purposes. Having no power to issue any other bonds, when money was required a “ Water Bond ” was issued, until the debt reached some $20,000. f Ritchie’s spring is situated in Third street, between Grand and Liberty streets. At the time of its purchase, the lots in the vicinity were covered with a pond which it sup- plied; When the lots were filled in and Third street opened, the spring was arched and covered over and its outlet conducted to a reservoir in Liberty street. The water from it is now conducted into the sewer in Third street. $ The commissioners named in the act were Lewis W. Young, George Cornwell and James Belknap. Mr. Cornwell subsequently resigned, and Eli Hasbrouck was appointed to fill the vacancy.NEWBURGH POST-OFFICE. 243 Little Pond, and in 1872-’3, by the laying of a new main connecting directly with the pond. The total of expenditures for construction, etc., from 1852 to 1875, were $381,031.16. In 1855, the water rents were $8,369; in 1875, $29,307.71. Of all classes of distributing pipes (exclusive of service pipes) there is a fraction over eighteen miles. The annual report of the commissioners, and of Major E. C. Boynton, the superintendent, for the year 1875, supplies complete details of receipts and expenditures. NEWBURGH POST-OFFICE. From the destruction by fire of the records of the post-office depart- ment at Washington in 1836, it is impossible to ascertain the date of the appointment of the first postmaster, or of the establishment of the office at Newburgh. From the records of the auditor’s office, in which the accounts of the postmasters are kept, the books of which were pre- served, it is ascertained that the office at Newburgh commenced ren- dering accounts on the 1st of January, 1796, and that Ebenezer Foote* was the first postmaster. It is, therefore, presumed that the office was established sometime during the month of December, 1795. A list of all the postmasters, prior to 1810, is annexed, each ap- pointee holding the office up to the time of the rendering of accounts by his successor, to wit: Ebenezer Foote, from 1st Jan. 1796. i Daniel Birdsall, from 1st Oct, 1802. Harry Caldwell, from 1st Oct. 1797. | Chester Clark, from 1st July, 1810. The following have been appointed since 1810: Aaron Belknap, March 26, 1812. Tooker Wygant, Nov. 26, 1830. A. C. Mulliner, May 23, 1833. Benj. H. Mace, Nov. 23, 1836. Oliver Davis, June 17, 1811. James Belknap; May 18,1813. Samuel W. Eager, Aug. 6,1819. * Joseph Casterline, Jr., May 1,1853. Ezra Farrington, May 22,1861. Jas. H. Reeve, Nov. 1, 1866. Henry Major, May 7,1867.f Jos. Lomas, Aug. 22,1867. Ezra Farrington, July 19,1869. John C. Adams, April 1,1875. The early mails of the district were carried and letters received and delivered by post-riders, who, for their own convenience, as well as for the convenience of those wishing to send letters, appointed stations for that purpose. The Newburgh station was, for many years, at the tavern of Michael Weigand; the New Windsor station, at the “ Glass House ” in the village of New Windsor. Letters were left at these stations until called for. The Newburgh office was the first in this section of the county; its delivery included letters for Marlborough, Plattekill, Montgomery, New Windsor, etc. * Ebenezer Foote was an officer of the continental army, and receiver of cattle at Fish- kill and Newburgh. After the war he located in Newburgh and was one of the repre- sentatives from Ulster county, in the assembly, from 1792 to 1797. He removed to Lan- singburgh, and was elected to the senate from the middle district, 1799 to 1802. He was a leading member of the masonic fraternity, and a P. M. of the first lodge located in New- burgh. t A special officer of the post-office department who held the place in consequence of the refusal of the senate to confirm the appointments of President Johnston.244 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH COMMERCIAL RECORD. As early as 1^161, it is written in regard to the commerce of New- burgh, that “many people from the back parts of the country bring their produce to send to New York, having at least three boats be- longing to the place that constantly go from thence to New York and return back again with goods, which creates a very considerable trade” The late James Donnelly stated in his recollections: “I know nothing about events before the war of the Revolution; but I have been informed, by those who were old men when I was young, that Major Isaac Belknap sailed a sloop prior to that time. Another sloop was sailed by a Captain Donoughue, or Donaghy; and another by William Harding. Richard Buckingham and Lewis Clark each owned a sloop during the war, but I presume they were not in the New York trade. Their sloops and Harding’s, however, were fre- quently in the public service; and just before the British sailed up the river, they were sent to Albany to carry troops to reenforce Genl. Gates. It was a fortunate occurrence for their owners, as the British would have destroyed them if they had found them here. Their sloops were built at- Albany, were of Dutch model, fast sailers and easily managed. They were built of red cedar, and were subsequently planked and re-planked until they were so spike-eaten that nothing more could be done with them. There was also a sloop sailed from here to Nantucket, commanded by Captain Coleman, a native of that place; and Major Belknap and others were engaged in some trading ventures with the West Indies.* Belknap’s sloop sailed from Colden’s dock, and it was here that my father landed on his removal to New- burgh in 11/14. One of the sloops received part of her cargo at Denton’s landing near Balmville, and the* other at what was after- wards Pettingale’s landing near the foot of North street. During the Revolution the business was, of course, suspended; and, although resumed at the close of the war, probably was not prosecuted to any considerable extent until after 1790. The docks which were first built were small and were principally located on the west side of what is now called Front street. The first dock was unquestionably that built by Alexander Colden at the foot of First street ; and the second, that afterwards owned by Daniel Smith at Balmville. Mi*. Donnelly stated that, “ prior to the war, the dock at Balmville was owned by Nchemiah Denton;” and that “ the Colden dock was then occupied by Isaac Belknap. After the war, * The papers of Major Belknap confirm Mr. Donnelly in reference to the sloops of William Harding, Richard Buckingham and Lewis Clark; and also show that on the 28th of Jan. 1771, the sloop Newbern, Isaac Belknap, captain; Edmond Jones, mate, and Silas Howell, mariner, while on her passage to the Island of Antigua, was driven on the rocks on the west coast Of the Island of Bermuda, but, although considerably injured, succeed- ed in reaching Mangrovet bay.COMMERCIAL RECORD. 245 Benjamin Birdsall occupied the Colden dock, and, Subsequently, George Gardner. Col. Jonathan Hasbrouck built a small dock—after- wards known as the red storehouse—on his own property, just below the Head-quarters, for the purpose of receiving grain and shipping flour. During the war, the continental dock, near the foot of Third street, was built for military purposes. During the year in which peace was proclaimed, the dock afterwards known as Oakley & Davis's was built, together with a storehouse for provisions for the army. After the close of the war, David Howell built a dock near the foot of Second street. Then came Walsh's dock, now Mailler's, and afterwards the dock of Jacob and Leonard Carpenter, (now occu- pied by Homer Ramsdell & Co.) The Oakley & Davis dock was first owned by a Mr. Crosby, I believe. DeWint's dock was the old conti- nental dock; and John Anderson's dock was just south of Walsh's.* * * § The docks were such as we now see occasionally along the river at some old brick-yard. A great depth of water was not required, for the vessels employed were generally flat-bottomed. " f From 1198-'99 to 18*15, the names of forwarders, captains, and vessels are fully set forth in their published advertisements, from which the following facts appear: From Colden's dock, foot of First street—Geo. Gardner, 1198 J to 1809; Geo. Gardner & Son, 1810-'15,§ Geo. Gardner & Son, 1822; Henry Robinson, 1823-'26; T. Powell & Co., 1835-'44; || Reeve, Moore & Co., 1845; Powell, Ramsdell & Co., fall of 1845-'51; H. Ramsdell & Co., 1858-'65. From Walsh’s dock, foot of Third street—Hugh Walsh, Derick Amerman, Crawford & Harris and others until 1808, F. Crawford and C. Belknap & Co., 1809-'ll; F. & D. Crawford, 1811-'30; D. Crawford & Co., 1831-'3l; Crawford, Mailler & Co., 1838-'54; W. K. Mailler & Co., 1855-'51; W. K. Mailler & Son, * Mr. Donnelly’s statement does not entirely correspond with the map of the township of Washington, given on page 159, but the discrepancy probably arises from the fact that the property subsequently changed hands. For example, lot No. 8 was the original pur- chase of Hugh Walsh in 1782, and covered what must have been the continental as well as the Oakley & Davis dock. Lot No. 7, immediately south, was owned by Aaron Fair- child and covered what was the Walsh dock (now Mailler’s). John McAuley purchased it from Fairchild in 1791, and kept store in one of the old army buildings until 1793, when he sold to Walsh. Anderson’s dock was the next, on the south side of Third street. The Crosby property was immediately north of Fifth street. It would be impossible to locate the old docks precisely from present landmarks. The army buildings appear to have been the first storehouses. ‘ The docks were all west of Front street, and the old storehouses were nearly on the present east line of Water street. f Ante p. 172,173. % The advertisements of 1798, announce that “ Caleb Coffin will continue to sail George Gardner’s sloop on alternate Fridays : ” that “ Daniel Smith and William Wilson, owners, Daniel Smith, master, will sail the sloop Morning Star, from Daniel Smith’s dock, on alter- nate Fridays; that “John Anderson will sail the sloop Eliza on alternate Tuesdays;” and that “ Derick Amerman will sail the sloop Ceres on alternate Tuesdays.” The Ceres was owned by Hugh Walsh. § Removed to DeWint’s dock in consequence of difficulty in access to the dock, but re- turned to it in 1822, when its facilities were improved. || Mr. Powell erected the storehouse and dock, which subsequently bore his name, the old storehouse having been destroyed by fire in June, 1835.246 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. 1858-’9; W. 0. Mailler, 1860-769; W. 0. Mailler & Co., 1870-’73.* * * § From Anderson’s dock, foot of Third street—John Anderson, 1798 to 1808. From Ludlow’s dockf (formerly John Anderson’s)—Alexander Falls and Jonathan Hedges sailed sloop Favorite, Benj. Case, Jr., master, in 1199. Their successors were: Jacob & Thomas Powell, 1802-’13; Selali Reeve and Wm. H. Falls, 1814-’24; Selah Reeve & Son, 1825-’26; Christopher and Geo. Reeve, 1827-’29; C. Reeve, 1831, who sold to D. Crawford & Co. From DeWint’s dock, north of Third street—Geo. Gardner, 1815-’21; Miller & Smith, 1822-’24; E. Case, 1835; Houston, Johnston & Co., 1838; Christopher Reeve, 1842; Reeve, Moore & Co., 1843-’44. J From dock foot of Fourth street—Farmer’s Company,§ 1806-’13; B. & I. Case, 1814-’20; Abm. Stagg & Co., 1820-’24; John Mount & Co., 1825-’26, and by Oakley & Davis, 1827-’39. From Car- penter’s dock, south of Second street—Caleb Coffin, 1800; Jacob & Leonard Carpenter, and B. Carpenter & Co., 1802-’64; Homer Rams- dell & Co., 1865-’76. From Balmville—Daniel Smith and others until 1818; H. & J. Butterworth, 1819; Selah Tuttle & Son, 1820, who were the last occupants. In 1845, the firm of Wardrop, Smith & Co. was organized and commenced business from a dock and store- house erected by J. Beveridge & Co. at the foot of Fifth street.— This firm was continued until 1858, when C. C. Smith sold his interest to Hiram Falls. On the death of Mr. Wardrop, the firm was dissolved and Falls & Johnston became its successors. On the death of Mr. Falls, Johnston & Alsdorf continued the business until 1870, when it passed to Alsdorf & Skidmore, who sold to Homer Ramsdell, in Feb- ruary, 1872, and retired from the trade. On the 1st of February, 1865, Homer Ramsdell bought the dock property and barge of B. Carpenter & Co., and consolidated the business of that firm with the firm of Homer Ramsdell & Co. During the season the large store- house of the firm was removed to a new foundation, and the store- house of Ramsdell & Co. removed and united with it, forming by far the largest and most complete structure on the Hudson. || The firm of * The barge Newburgh, then owned by this firm, together with a full cargo of freight, and also their storehouse, etc., were destroyed by fire in June, 1873, and at the close of season the firm retired from the freighting business. t Robert Ludlow, father of the late Mrs. Thomas Powell, bought the property from Water street to the river in 1796, and built a store on Water street and a new dock in the rear. During its ownership by the Powells it was called Powells’ dock, and subsequently Reeve’s dock. The old storehouse was moved to Crawford’s dock and consolidated with that of D. Crawford & Co., and was destroyed in the fire of 1872. $ The DeWint storehouse and the Oakley & Davis storehouse adjoining, were destroyed by fire December 18,1848. § This company appears to have been a regularly organized association; its busi- ness was conducted by directors who were generally changed annually. After the disso- lution of the company, a similar association was organized by an act of incorporation, passed by the Legislature, April, 1825. This company orginated, it is said, with Mr. Jonathan’Hasbrouclt, who was its principal manager. The “ Chancellor Livingston ” was run for a few trips, in the name of the company, from the old red storehouse ; and then the project was abandoned. || Ante p. 203.GEO, GARDNER’S STOREHOUSE, 1798, Front-st., West side, South of First Street'. See p. 172, 173, 201, 246. HOMER RAMSDELL & CO.’S STOREHOUSE, 1875. Front-st , East side, bet. Second and First. Ante p. 2C1, 203, 246,COMMERCIAL RECORD. 247 Homer Ramsdell & Co. is now the only freight line between New- burgh and New York; their barges have a carrying capacity of 500 tons each; their daily freights probably exceed the weekly freights of twenty years ago, being greatly augmented by the trade of the entire eastern division of the Erie railroad. The business was conducted entirely by sloops until 1830. The introduction of steam vessels, however, was proposed in 1825, at a meeting of sloop owners (June 6), and a committee appointed for the purpose of making inquiry “ relative to the building of a good and sufficient steamboat or boats, for the purpose of conveying freight or passengers from this village and landings adjoining.”* This action was doubtless intended to allay the feeling against sloop navigation which had grown out of the disaster to the “Neptune,” in November of the previous year.f Here the matter rested until the winter of 1829-’30, when Mr. Christopher Reeve purchased the steamer Balti- * A meeting of sloop owners was held June 6,1825,—Selah Reeve, chairman, and David Crawford, secretary,—to consider the expediency of placing a steamboat on the Newburgh line. After discussion, it was “Resolved, That a committee, consisting they were reprimanded and let go. Watkins, however, was not libe- rated until the next year, when, having acknowledged the authorship of the article, he was reprimanded and set free. (Doc. Hist, iv.) “ Of this faithful and laborious servant in the Gospel,” says Dr. Brown, (Historical Sermon p. 15,) *‘ there are now in this county many respectable friends and relatives bearing the same name.” The late Hezekiah Watkins, of Gardiner, Ulster county, was a relative of the Newburgh minister, and the same remark may be made of Dr. John D. Watkins, of Liberty, Sullivan county. (History Sul. Co., 357.)CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC 291 ration,” &c. - Dated, Coldenham, Nov. 17th, 1769. The petition is signed by John Sayre,* missionary; Chas. Bobie, Cad. Colden, Jr., Sami. Fowler, and Joseph Watkins, vestrymen; and Bobert Carskad- den, Andrew Graham, and Josiah Gilbert, wardens. It is endorsed: “1769, Dec. 12. Bead in council and granted.” The charter, how- ever, for some reason was not issued, and, on the 16th of April, 1770, another petition was sent to the governor, by the Bev. Mr. Sayre, and Messrs. Samuel Fowler, William Ellison, Stephen Wiggins, Leonard Smith, Samuel Winslow, and Nathan Purdy. This also is endorsed: “1770, May 2d. Bead in council and granted.” On the 30th of July, 1770, a charter was issued, which is still preserved, incorpo- rating the church as St. George’s. The prosperity of the church was very seriously affected by the Bevolution. In 1775, Mr. Sayre resigned his office, and many of his parishioners conscientiously adhered to the cause of the king and thus excited against the church the popular feeling. When the war was ended, the St. George’s parish of 1770 had neither minister, nor war- dens, nor vestry, and practically it had ceased to exist. No attempt to resuscitate the church appears to have been made until 1790, when the Bev. George H. Spierin was elected to discharge the double duty of minister and school-master; but his election was resisted by a large portion of the inhabitants of the German patent, and he only served until 1793,f when the station again became vacant and so remained for more than ten years. On the 4th November, 1805, the church was reorganized under the old name of St. George’s. “So fearfully small,” says Dr. Brown, “was the number of her friends here, that it was found necessary to resort to the neighboring parishes for a sufficient number even to form an incorporation.” At this time, the special purpose of the reorgani- zation was a legal one, such a step being deemed necessary in order to a recovery of the old church and Glebe. Of the trial at law which ensued it is unnecessary to speak, as a full account of it is given in a previous chapter. The following is the record of the reorganization: “ Nov. 4, 1805. At a meeting of the persons attached to the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, it was unanimously agreed, that the Protestant Episcopal Church of the Parish of Newburgh, should be known, as heretofore, by the name of St. George’s Church; and that the election for Church Wardens and Vestrymen of said Church should be held annually on Tuesday in Easter week at the Protestant Epis- copal Church, on the German patent, in the said Parish of Newburgh. “ The following wardens and vestrymen were elected: Arthur Smith and George Merritt, wardens; Wm. W. Sackett, Gilbert Colden Willet, Sami. Floyd, Thos. Carskadden, John * Mr. Sayre was a man of talent and a popular preacher. He was very successful in his ministrations, and gathered large congregations at the different stations where he preached. He succeeded in obtaining a charter of incorporation for each of the three churches under his care, viz: St George’s church, of Newburgh; St. Andrew’s church, of Montgomery; and St. David’s church, of Goshen (now in Hamptonburgh). f Mr. Spierin accepted a call from the congregation of Poughkeepsie, and removed to that place in 1798.292 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Garrit, David Fowler, Henry Caldwell, and Jnstin Foot, vestrymen; and Jonathan Fisk and Joseph Hoffman, Trustees of the Glebe.” “Jan. 28,1806. On motion, Resolved, That Mr. Sackett, Mr. Fisk, and Mr. Carskad- den be a committee to wait on Mr. Foster for his consent that our minister, next time he preaches in this Parish, preach in the Academy. “ On motion, Resolved, That Mr. Fisk, Mr. Hoffman and Mr. Carskadden be a com- mittee to open and repair St. George’s Church in this Parish.” (The old Lutheran church.) “ April 8,1806. At a meeting of the Wardens and Vestrymen of St. George’s Church, in the Parish of Newburgh, held on Tuesday, the 8th day of April, 1806, at the house of Robt. R. Dolph, in the Parish of Newburgh, for the purpose of electing two Wardens and eight Vestrymen: George Merritt in the chair; J. Fisk, clerk. The following were chosen: Henry Caldwell and David Fowler, Wardens; Wm. W. Sackett, G. C. Willet, Sami. Floyd, Thos. Carskadden, Justin Foote, Francis Smith, John Garrit, and Wm. Taylor, Vestrymen. “ On motion, Resolved, That Mr. Fisk be Clerk to the Vestry and Wardens. “ On motion, Resolved, That Henry Caldwell be Treasurer of this Church. “ On motion, Resolved, That Messrs. Floyd, Hoffman, Fowler, and Willet be a com- mittee to procure subscriptions and solicit donations for the purpose of enabling this Church to support a clergyman. •. ‘ ‘ Mr. Graham and Mr. Colden, a committee from St. Andrew’s, applied to St. George’s to ascertain if this Church will unite with them in the support of a clergyman. On mo- tion, Resolved, That this Church will unite with St. Andrew’s in the support of a clergy- man; and that Mr. Fowler, Mr. Caldwell, and Mr. Fisk, be a committee to confer with the said committee from St. Andrew’s, and conclude the terms on which such clergyman shall be employed by our united support, and that the said committee also confer with the Episcopal Church at Goshen and ascertain if that Church will unite with this and St. An- drew’s to support a clergyman.” “ July 28, 1806. Committee on Pastor reported, that they had not been able to meet with committees from St. Andrew’s and Goshen.” “Aug. 4, 1806. Committee reported that the Church at Goshen, St. Andrews, New Windsor, and Newburgh, had agreed to unite in supporting a clergyman.” The pastor whose services were secured under the agreement of August 4th, above quoted, was the Rev. Frederick Yan Horne, who resided at St. Andrew’s (at the time probably the strongest con- gregation in the proposed circuit), who continued in that capacity until 1809, when he removed to Ballston,. The Rev. Mr. Mackin succeeded him, but remained in the field only a few months; and during the next year (1810) an agreement was made with Rev. Mr. Powell, rector of St. Andrew’s, Coldenham, by St. George’s church, for the one third of his time. This state of things continued until 1815, when the Rev. Dr. John Brown entered upon the duties of rec- tor of St. George’s church, having preached his inaugural sermon on the 24th Dec. of that year. Dr. Brown, then only in deacon’s orders, had just commenced his ministerial labors in Trinity church, Fishkill. By the advice of the late Bishop Hobart, he was induced to perform a third service in Newburgh for many Sundays in succession, during which period “ the Holy Communion was administered for the first time in the parish since the revolutionary war to the small number of three.” During the first year of Dr. Brown’s imcumbency, the num- ber of persons confirmed was thirty-seven, and twenty-eight were ad- mitted to the holy communion. Dr. Brown continued in full charge of the work of the parish until January, 1859, when Rev. Caleb S. Henry, D. D., was engaged as assistant minister, and served until March, 1861. In October, 1859, Rev. Hobart Chetwood was engaged in the same capacity, and served until June, 1860. He was succeeded in October by Rev. John W. Clark, who served until November, 1862,CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 293 when the office was discontinued. Revs. T. M. Riley, John F. Potter, John Downie, and Alex. Davidson^ successively served as assistants to the rector until October, 1868, when the Rev. Octavius Applegate was elected assistant minister with duties involving the active rectorship. The first edifice occupied by the congregation of St. George’s was, as before mentioned, the one erected by the Lutherans, and long- known as the old Glebe school-house. When the Episcopalians ceased to occupy this church is uncertain, but it was probably very soon after the war of the revolution began. In 1815, the congrega- tion was temporarily accommodated, through the kindness of the late Mr. Thomas Ellison of New Windsor, in a building on Liberty street, known as the McIntosh house. Here it remained for some years. The church edifice (St. George’s) was begun in 1816, and was conse- ST. GEORGE’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH. crated by Bishop Hobart, November 10, 1819. The increase of the congregation rendering more room necessary, a gallery was put up in 1826, and at the same time an organ was purchased. In 1834, the building was enlarged, and the steeple was added, in which a fine toned bell was hung. The church was again enlarged and beautified in 1853, at an expense of $9,000. At that time the tasteful and com- modious Sunday-school room and vestry was built on the south side of the church. The church edifice is the doric style of architecture. It has a front on Grand street of 45 feet, and is 90 feet in depth. Its pews furnish accommodations for 650 persons. The accommodations furnished by the enlargement of the church, however, failed to meet the requirements of the congregation, and in March, 1859, the rector and vestry of St. George’s purchased the edi-294 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. fice originally erected by the congregation of the Union A. R. church. This building was thoroughly refitted and improved in its architect- ure, and in the following May it was consecrated for Episcopal wor- ship under the name of St. John’s chapel. The enterprise failed of success, and the building was (1864) sold for other purposes. In the meantime the necessity which its purchase was designed to supply, had found accommodation in st. Paul’s episcopal chubch, the organization of which sprang from a desire, on the part of several members of St. George’s parish, to extend the influence of the Epis- copal faith over a field wider than that which it was thought could be successfully embraced under a single church jurisdiction. The propo- sition to divide the old parish and erect an additional one, was made in 1858, but no steps were then taken to accomplish that object. On the 12th May, 1860, the proposition was renewed, and a formal appli- cation was made to the rector of St. George’s, in accordance with the laws of the Episcopal church, for his official consent to the organiza- tion of a new congregation within the limits of his parish. The application received the consent of the Rev. Dr. Brown, and the congregation of St. Paul’s church was soon after informally organ- ized. On the 5th of June, the members of the proposed new congre- gation extended a unanimous call to the Rev. Hobart Chetwood, at that time assistant minister of St. George’s church, to be their pastor. This call was accepted by Mr. Chetwood—the acceptance to take effect at the termination of his engagement to the old parish, Nov. 1st, 1860. By the subsequent action of the vestry of St. George’s, Mr. Chetwood’s connection with that parish ceased on the 23d of June; and, on the 25th of June, he consented to enter at once upon his du- ties as minister of St. Paul’s. The organization of the church was completed on the 11th September, by the election of David M. Clark- son and William E. Warren, wardens; and F. C. Withers, Hiram Falls, H. H. Bell, Wm. Bogert, R. Y. K. Montfort, John Gordon, E. W. Gray, and G. J. Appleton, vestrymen. Mr. Chetwood exchanged with Rev. H. P. C. Melville, during the winter of 1866. Rev. Dr. Lundy served as assistant minister from Sept. 1st, 1867, to his death in April, 1868. Rev. Dr. Irving was his successor for six months. In June, 1872, Mr. Chetwood resigned the rectorship, and in September following, Rev. Rufus Emery became his successor. The first service of the church was held in the Highland Academy (now the Home for the Friendless), on Sunday, July 1st. Within a fortnight after that date, a lot was purchased on Grand street, at a cost of $4,100, and a contract entered into with Mr. Jno. Little for the erection of a chapel. The building was opened for divine worship onCHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 295 the first Sunday in October (Oct. 7, 1860). Its cost, including furni- ture, was about $2,300. On the 1st June, 1864, the erection of a church edifice was formally inaugurated, with the expressed intention of prosecuting the undertaking to enclosure, leaving the nave, tower, etc., to the future. The corner-stone was laid on Thursday afternoon, August 24th, 1865, by Rev. John Brown, D. D., under appointment of the bishop of the diocese. The building, although in occupation and supplied with an organ, etc., awaits completion in the respects already mentioned. The expenditure so far made is about $35,000. st. george's mission. St. George's Mission was begun June 4th, 1871, in an upper room, called McConkey’s hall, on Western Avenue. In October following two floors of a tenement were engaged and fitted up for service as well as Sunday-school, which were continued from October 29, 1871, until February 16, 1872, when the chapel, which had been erected in the meantime, was occupied. The cost of the chapel, including lot, . furniture, etc., was $4,353.16. Revs. Boss, Smith, and G W. Hinkle have been the ministers in charge. THE CHURCH OF THE CORNER-STONE. On the 8th of August, 1875, Bishop Cummings, of the Reformed Protestant Episcopal Church, held service in the American Reformed Church, and on the evening of the 25th “The Church of the Corner- stone” was organized under the general statute of the state of New York, and the following officers elected: Wardens—Daniel T. Rogers and Walter C. Anthony; Vestrymen—James G. Graham, J. Wilson Stratton, William J. Roe, Jr., George Middleton, Robert L. Case, Jas. G. Birch, Edward Haigh. Benjamin F. Clark, secretary and treas- urer; James G. Birch, superintendent of Sabbath-school. Regular services were subsequently held in the lecture room of the Associate Reformed Church. Rev. Dr. Leacock was called to the rectorship in October, and entered at once upon the discharge of its duties. In November ground was broken for the erection of the church edifice on South street; and on the 24th of that month the contract for building was given to Thomas Dobin at $4,969. The structure is of Gothic style and has a frontage of thirty-three feet. Seating accom- modations are provided for about two hundred and fifty persons. It was first occupied on Easter-Sunday (April 16), 1876. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. The adherents of the Presbyterian faith who first came to New- burgh were connected with the Bethlehem church in Cornwall, which was founded about 1726. From this parent stem sprang the church of New Windsor, which was organized September 14,1764, when the sermon was preached by the Rev. Mr. Moffat, and Jos. Wood, Wm,296 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Lawrence, Samuel Brewster, and Henry Smith were chosen elders. The Bev. Timothy Johnes,* afterwards and for many years pastor of the church of Morristown, N. J., was appointed stated supply of the church by the Presbytery of New York, and served in that capacity from the 5th of May, 1766, until October, 1767, when he was succeed- ed by the Bev. Francis Peppard, who remained until 1773. During the pastorate of Mr. Peppard, the district was divided into four parts, viz: Bethlehem or New Cornwall, Murderer’s creek, New Windsor, and Newburgh, in each of which trustees were appointed for the purpose of raising funds and taking charge of the temporal affairs of the church in their respective neighborhoods, thereby creating, as it were, four informal societies. The withdrawal of Mr. Peppard left the sta- tion vacant, and measures were taken to secure the services of the Bev. John Close. While these arrangements were pending, however, the Marlborough Society invited the trustees of the Newburgh district to unite with them in temporarily settling the Bev. John McCallah over both districts. This invitation was accepted, and Mr. McCallali entered upon his duties September 26, 1773. J But his labors in Newburgh could have been only for a few weeks, as in November of the same year, the arrangements for that purpose having been per- fected, Mr. Close was invited to take the vacant charge, and soon after entered upon the duties of pastor. The war of the Bevolution, how- ever, prevented his formal installation, and, a large portion of his time being occupied as chaplain in the militia, the public services of the church were very irregular. In consequence of these facts, the infor- mal society in Newburgh appears to have maintained a separate or- ganization during the war, elder William Lawrence performing the pastoral duties. Immediately after the war, this informal society, strengthened by * The Rev. Timothy Johnes was the grandfather of Edward R. and Aaron P. Johnes, of Newburgh. t At a meeting of the Elders and several of the members of the congregation of New Windsor, the 22d August, 1773, for setting on foot a subscription for raising a salary for the Rev. John Close, in order to the calling of him as the stated Teacher and Pastor of the united congregations of Bethlehem ana New Windsor— “ It is agreed,' that the congregation stand divided into four districts, as in Mr. Pep- pard’s time (i. e. 1767): That Trustees be appointed in each district in whose names the subscriptions shall be taken for the use of the said Mr. Close ; and the following persons were named as Trustees, viz : “ New Cornwall District—Joseph Wood, Reuben Clark, Joseph Smith, Daniel Wood, Jeremiah Clark. “ Murderer's Greek District—Francis Mandevill, Samuel Brewster, William Roe, Benja- min Case, William Williams. “ New Windsor District—John Nicoll, James Clinton, David Halladay, Sami. Brewster, Leonard Nicoll, George Clinton, Judah Harlow, Sami. Logan, Charles Booth. “ Newburgh District—Jonathan Hasbrouck, Abel Belknap, Moses Higby, Elnathan Foster, Isaac Belknap.”—Clinton Papers, State Library. ^ “ Sept. 24, 1773. This day hired the Rev. Mr. John McCallah for six months, to preach one half of the time in the meeting house and the other half at Newburgh, the two trustees accountable to him for the sum of £20—12s, and the Lower or Newburgh Society accountable for the remainder of his salary.”—Min, Marlb. Society,churches, schools, etc. 297 the addition of several persons who became permanent residents on the disbandment of the army, obtained the building which had been erected by the army as a store-house for clothing, where it appears to have held public worship in the winter of 1783, or spring of 1784. The records of the church state that divine service was held here in 1784, and that the congregation was formally organized in the same year. The minutes of the meeting held for the purpose of organiza-. tion, are as follows, viz: “ In pursuance of an act entitled “ An Act to enable all Religious Denominations in the State to appoint Trustees, who shall be a body corporate for the purpose of taking care of the Temporalities of their respective congregations, and for other purposes,” passed the 6th day of April, 1784, the congregation or Religious Society desirous of forming them- selves into a regular well-constituted congregation or society, agreeable to the Canon of the Church of Scotland, at Newburgh, did, on the 12th day of July last past—being stated attendants on Divine worship by Elder William Lawrence—advertise a meeting of the said congregation, agreeable to the said Act, to meet at the house of Adolph DeGrove, for the purpose of electing, according to the true intent and meaning thereof, Trustees for the good purposes intended and mentioned in the said Act; and being convened at the time and place aforesaid, did, in the first place, by plurality of voices, nominate and appoint Mr. Asa Steward to act with the said William Lawrence as Returning officers, who pro- ceeded to open the poll, and after taking that part of the said congregation or society con- vened on the occasion and present agreeable to said Act—Adolph DeGrove, Daniel Hud- son, Thomas Palmer, Joseph Coleman, and Isaac Belknap, were appointed and legally elected Trustees for the said congregation or society, agreeable to the said Act. 2d. We then proceeded to elect a Clerk to insert the certificate of the Returning officers. Be it remembered, that we, William Lawrence and Asa Steward, having been legally elected and appointed the Returning officers at the election held at the house of Adolph DeGrove, at Newburgh, the ,12th day of August, 1784, for the purpose of electing Trus- tees for taking care of the Temporalities of the congregation or Religious Society at New- burgh, aforesaid, agreeable to an Act entitled “An Act,” &c., do hereby certify, that Adolph DeGrove, Daniel Hudson, Thomas Palmer, Joseph Coleman, and Isaac Belknap, were legally and unanimously elected as Trustees for the purposes aforesaid, and that the said persons so elected, and their successors forever hereafter, shall be known by the name, style and title of the Trustees of the Presbyterian Congregation at Newburgh. In wit- ness whereof, we have hereunto set our hands and seals the 12th day of August, in the year of our Lord, 1784.” As the congregation was quite too feeble in means and member- ship for the support of a pastor, it was resolved* at a meeting held 8th Feb., 1785, to unite for this purpose with the church of New Windsor. The records declare that, “ the congregation assembled at the meeting house, William Lawrence, ruling elder, being moderator. It was agreed 1. To join in union with the congregation of New Windsor. 2. That the Trustees for the congregation of Newburgh be empowered to form a union with the Trustees of New Windsor congregation, for promoting the preaching of the Gos- pel, not exceeding seven years, nor under five.” A joint meeting of the trustees named was soon after held (Feb. 11, 1785, ) at the house of Adolph DeGrove, at which Abel Belknap pre- sided. Daniel Hudson, Joseph Goleman, Isaac Belknap, and Adolph DeGrove, represented Newburgh; and Abel Belknap, Samuel Logan, Leonard NicoU, Silas White, Benjamin Birdsall, Isaac Schultz, and Samuel Brewster, represented New Windsor. After conversation it was “ unanimously agreed between the trustees of the said congrega- tions for joining the union for seven years.” In April, 1785, application was made to the Presbytery for the298 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH appointment of Mr. Close to be the stated supply of both churches. The request was granted, and he continued to labor here until 1796.* * * § During the first year of his service, Mr. Close preached in Newburgh one third of his time, for which he was paid £23. He was succeeded by the Rev. Isaac Lewis, who served the congregation as stated supply until the spring of 1800, when he became the pastor of the Presby- terian church of Cooperstown.f On the 6th of May, 1800, the Rev. Jonathan Freeman was installed pastor of the united church, and the first pastor of that of Newburgh. J He resigned the charge in 1804. His successor was the Rev. Eleazer Burnet, who was ordained and installed pastor, 20th Nov. 1805,§ and who held the station until his death, in 1806. The Rev. Dr. John Johnston, then a licentiate, first preached in Newburgh about the time of Mr. Burnet’s decease, and occasionally supplied the united churches during the winter of 1806-7. He was ordained and installed as pastor on the 5th August, 1807. || In the spring of 1810, the connection between the two churches was dissolved; and the services of Mr. Johnston were henceforth con- fined to Newburgh. Here he continued to labor with unwearied dili- gence and great success until February, 1855, when he was pros- trated by severe illness which subsequently terminated his life. The congregation was supplied during Dr. Johnston’s illness and * Rev. John Close was a native of Greenwich, Conn. He was horn in 1737, graduated at Princeton in 1768, was licensed by the Presbytery of Duchess county in 1765, and ordain- ed as colleague of the Rev. Eben Prime at Huntington, L. I., in 1766. He removed to Waterford in 1796, and died there in 1813.—Bolton's Westchester County, ii, 510. f In i806, Mr. Lewis was called to the pastoral care of the church at Goshen, where he remained until 1811 or ’12. After laboring in sundry places as a stated supply, he was settled as the successor of his father, over the church at Greenwich, Conn., in 1818. After a successful ministry of a few years, he resigned this charge and became pastor of the church in Bristol, L. I. He lost his voice in 1831, and though he occasionally preached, he was never again a pastor. He died in New York, 2d September, 1854, in his 82d year. Sprague's Annals, i, 667. i Mr. Freeman was pastor of the church of Hopewell (Crawford, Orange co.), from August, 1793, until April, 1798, where his labors were very successful. (Eagei^s Orange County, 341.) He was a man of more than ordinary ability, as his published sermons attest; but the tone of his preaching was perhaps more polemic than it should have been, and he is said to have excited the bitter hostility of the skeptics who were then somewhat numerous and influential. He resigned his charge in 1804. In connection with Silvanus Haight, he conducted “ The Cliosopliic Hall,” an educational institute, at his residence in Montgomery street (subsequently the residence of Samuel Williams), which was organ- ized in 1799. He was afterwards for many years pastor of the Presbyterian church of Brighton, N. J., where he died in 1824 or ’25. § The sermon on this occasion was preached by the Rev. Ebenezer Grant, from Malachi ii, 6. Mr. Burnet was a graduate of Princeton college (1799), an amiable, pious, and de- voted young man, but feeble in health at the time of his settlement. Indeed, he was even then laboring under the disease — consumption—which soon ended his labors and his life. He was compelled to seek a more congenial climate, early in the autumn of 1806. On his way South, he was taken so ill as to be obliged to stop at the house of a Mend in New Brunswick, where he died on the 22d Nov., 1806. || “On Wednesday, 5th inst., Mr. John Johnston was ordained to the work of the holy ministry and installed over the united congregations of Newburgh and New Windsor. The exercises were as follows : Rev. Isaac Yan Doren made the prayer: the Rev. Isaac Lewis delivered the sermon from Col. iii, 11, “But Christ is all in all.” The Rev. Methuselah Baldwin gave the charge to the ordained minister; and the Rev. Ebenezer Grant gave the charge to the people. The several exercises were appropriate and were conducted with great solemnity.—Political Index, Aug. 15, 1807.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 299 until the summer of 1856, by Mr. S. H. McMullen, a licentiate of the Presbytery of Philadelphia. On the 20th September of that year, the Rev. W. T. Sprole, D. D., was chosen pastor, and on the 28th October following, was installed.* * * § He resigned in July, 1872, and was suc- ceeded by Rev. W. K. Hall, who was installed in October of that year. The building in which public worship was first held, was one erected by the commissary-general, as a clothing store-house, while the army of the revolution was encamped here. It stood on the site subsequently occupied by the old first church, and was destroyed by fire about the year 1790. Dr. Johnston says it was burnt on a Sabbath day, after service had been held in it. From an inventory of their corporate property in a return made to the legislature,f the building appears to have belonged to the congregation in 1787, and, from the statement in the records that the “ congregation assembled at the meeting house ” (1785), it is probable that it was transferred to them soon after the war. There seems to have been some difference of opinion in regard to the location of the church, after the old building was burnt; but, in February, 1791, the trustees voted that “ the lot of land where the house formerly stood, with the addition that Mr. Smith proposes to make, be accepted in preference to any other location” as the site for a new church. On the 20th December of the same year, the trustees agreed to erect a church 50x55 feet, with the addition of a steeple. J The ground was staked out on the 25th May, 1792, and on the 31st of the same month the deed for the lot was executed by Mr. Benja- min Smith. § During the interval between the destruction of the old building and the occupation of the new church, the minutes state that the meetings of the congregation were “held at St. George’s church”—i. e. the old Lutheran church. The new building must have been occupied in 1793, as it is of record that during that year pews were erected and sold. But the interior of the building re- * The services were conducted by the Rev. Mr. Bowers, Moderator of the Presbytery. The discourse was delivered by Rev. Mr. Phillips, of Rondout, from Exodus xxxii, 15,16. The charge to the pastor was delivered by the Rev. Mr. Jagger, of Marlborough, and the charge to the people by the Rev. Mr. Smuller, of Kingston. t The inventory is as follows, viz: “ Meeting house church out of repair,...............................£40 Land belonging thereto, 200 by 160 feet,.......................... 60—£100.” $ This steeple was at first simply a square tower which stood on the south side of the church, and formed the entrance into the gallery until 1828. A rude drawing of the building, on a map of the property of Thomas Colden, made in 1797, represents an en- trance to the main building near the center of the east side; but whether this was the main entrance or not is not known. § The deed referred to shows the grant by Benjamin Smith to Christopher Van Duzer, Selah Reeve, John DuBois, Daniel Smith, and Derick Amerman, “for and in consideration of the sum of five shillings,” of a part of the farm whereon the grantor then resided, bemg a lot one hundred and thirty-eight feet by one hundred feet, on the corner of Mont- gomery and First streets, “for the proper use, benefit and behoof of the Presbyterian Church at Newburgh, provided that they shall erect a building thereon for the use and accommodation of the Presbyterian church and congregation at Newburgh, and to no other use whatsoever, unless the Ministers and Elders of said church shall thereto consent.”300 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH mained in a half finished condition until after the settlement of Dr. Johnston, who says that it was without gallery, plastering, or pulpit, “a mere shell.” “I often preached standing on a carpenter’s bench with a few boards standing in front on which to rest the precious Bible.”* Very soon after Dr. Johnston was settled, the interior was properly fitted up, and made more tenantable. In 1828 an unsuc- cessful effort was made to erect a new church of stone, 66x70 feet, at a cost not exceeding $9,- 000. Finally, as more accommodation was im- peratively demanded, it was determined to repair the old building, which was done in 1828. For- merly the pulpit was at the north end, and the pews were old fashioned square ones. Though the audience room was unchanged in size, the introduction of slips en- abled it to hold a larger inumber than it did be- fjkst pbesbyterian church—1828. fore.*j* binder this alter- ation the building remained until its removal in July, 1871. On the 25th July, 1857, the trustees, at a regular meeting, adopted the following preamble and resolutions: “Whereas, The circumstances of the church and congregation render it imperative that a new edifice be erected for their accommodation, and having the assent and concurrence of the pew-holders and members, as appears from the subscriptions for said object, therefore “Resolved, That we proceed to accomplish the same, according to the plan and speci- fications drawn by Mr. F. C. Withers, which has been submitted for the consideration and adoption of the subscribers; and that the following persons be a Building Commit- tee to supervise the same and carry it forward, viz: S. R. Van Duzer, E. R. Johnes, J. J. Monell, Henry Ball, Isaac Stanton, and George Clark. “ Resolved, That the church edifice be erected, upon the lot on the north-west corner of Grand and South streets.” * Mr. Eager relates (Hist. Or. Co., 1M), that at the time of the erection of this church the congregation “ was too poor to finish and place pews in it,” and that the plan devised to seat it was, “ that every person who chose to do so should have the privilege of putting up their own pews with a choice of location for so doing. The first person availing him- self of this privilege was Mr. John McAulay, whose example was soon followed by Mr. Hugh Walsh and Mr. Richard Wood. Others at intervals, did the sajne, and received deeds. This erection of seats went on for some time, and pews were scattered around the building without reference to order or taste. Finally the congregation took hold of the matter and completed and systematized the work.” f The Session House or Lecture Room was built about 1812, (Memorial, 105), but it was not fitted up with permanent seats until 1828. It was removed after the completion of the present Union Church.CHURCHES,, SCHOOLS, ATG 301 The site fixed upon was purchased, and a contract was made with Mr. George Yeitch, builder, for the construction of the new edifice for $27,500. The work was begun on the 8th of August, 1857. The building was dedicated November 4th, 1858,* and on Thanksgiving morning (Nov. 10), the iron cross was fixed on the spire. The building is in the early geometrical style of Gothic art, and is composed of a nave with clere- story, north and south aisle, a tower and stone spire at the east end of the north aisle, and a porch on the south.— A lecture room and a minister’s room are provi- ded at the west end of the build- ing. The walls are of blue stone laid in random courses, and gray stone dres- first PRESBYTERIAN church—1858. sings to the copings, windows, doorways, buttresses, water-tables, &c. The pews are of yellow pine, and afford comfortable accommodations for 830 persons. The principal dimensions of the building, internally, are as follows, viz: nave, 97 feet long, 60 feet high, and 25 feet wide. The aisles are 84 feet long and 17 feet wide. The lecture room is 42 feet long and 26 feet wide. The tower is 20 feet and 8 inches square at the base, and its height is 63 feet, making, with the spire and cross, a total of 135 feet from the ground. The extreme length of the building, including lecture room, is 159 feet; and its width, in- cluding porch, 85 feet. The total cost of the building, with interior * Tlie dedicatory services were conducted by the Presbytery of North River, and were opened by the Rev. B. F. Phillips, of Rondout, in a short Invocation, which was followed by the sentence, “ Holy, Lord God of Sabaoth,” by the choir. The Rev. John Lillie, D. D., of Kingston, then read the 132d Psalm; after which the choir sang the Anthem. “ And it shall come to pass in the last days that the mountain of the Lord’s House shall be es- tablished.” The Rev. Mr. Lillie then addressed the Throne of Grace in an earnest prayer; and the congregation joined in singing Hym 509, “How beautious are their feet,”*&c. The Rev. Mr. Phillips then delivered the dedication sermon from the text, Mat. xxvi, 8, “ To what purpose is this waste?” Rev. Doct. Sprole followed in a few brief remarks, showing the necessity that had compelled the erection of the new edifice; and after con- cluding, made an impressive dedicatory prayer. The choir then sang the anthem, “ How beautiful in Zion,” and the audience was dismissed with the benediction.302 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. fittings complete, including land, iron fence, bell, &c., was about $43,750. An organ, built by Geo. Jardine & Son, of New York, and costing $3,000, was obtained in September, 1860. It only remains to add, that the congregation resolved to sell their old place of worship, which was accordingly done to the Union Church in March, 1859. SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. The proposal to organize a Second Presbyterian Church was first discussed in 1837, but nothing was done until April, 1838, when Ur. Johnston preached an earnest and forcible sermon on the subject. At his suggestion, a meeting was held to consider the propriety of send- ing a colony from the old church. The meeting was held in the first church, May 15,1837, William Walsh being chairman, and J. H. Wells, secretary. After discussion, it was unanimously “ Resolved, That measures be immediately taken to forward the enterprise.” Accordingly Messrs. J. H. Corwin, Abel Belknap, and O. M. Smith, were appointed a committee to ascertain the number of persons willing to unite for this purpose. On the 22d May, at an adjourned meeting, the following named persons were reported as ready to associate and walk together as a church, viz: 0. M. Smith, Helen M. Smith, Sami. Tuthill, Sarah Tuthill, Jefferson Roe, Mary Roe, Eliza C. Boice, Wm. H. Wells, Robert Sterling, Isabella Sterling, Asa Sterling, John H. Corwin, Cyntha Corwin, Jas P. Buchanan, Sarah Buchanan, Daniel D. T. Blake, D. McDowall, Abigail Waters, J. R. Hardenburgh, Wm. M. Johnson, Jane E. Johnson, Eli Corwin, Jr., Abel Belknap, Sarah M. Belknap. Henry Tice, Jr., Charlotte Tice, Edgar Perkins, Ann Forsyth, Abigail Wells, William Waller, Henry Vail, Seth Belknap, Geo. M. Gregory, Hiram K. Chapman, Jane Chapman, Peter H. Foster, Mary S. Foster, Wm. Townsend, Lydia C. Parkham, George T. Hoagland, Betsey Harris, Mary E. Waterfield, Jas. H. Reynor, Job Clark. It was immediately and unanimously resolved to apply to the Pres- bytery, which was to meet on the 9th of June, for an organization as the Second Presbyterian Church of Newburgh. Mr. William Sterling was deputed to present the application and to ask for sup- plies for six months from the Presbytery. The request was granted, and the church was organized on the 15th June, by a committee of the North River Presbytery, consisting of the Rev. Messrs. Johnston, Prime, and Ostrum. The following persons were chosen riding elders, viz: J. H. Corwin, Hiram K. Chapman, Abel Belknap, Jas. P. Buchanan. Mr. Ostrom gave the charge to the church, and Mr. S. I. Prime to the elders. The first public service was held in the court room in the academy, when Rev. S. I. Prime preached from Amos vii, 5, “By whom shall Jacob arise, for he is small.” The pulpit was for some time supplied by the Presbytery. On the 20th August, Messrs. Peter H. Foster, Jefferson Roe, Edgar Perkins, Samuel Tuthill, O. M. Smith, and Henry Tice, Jr., were chosen trustees.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC 303 During the greater part of 1838 and ’39, the Rev. Abram C. Bald- win supplied the pulpit. In the former year the prospects of the infant church were very seriously affected by the disruption of the Presbytery. Most of those concerned in starting it, who had strong Old School affinities, returned again to the old church, which adhered to the O. S. Assembly. The second church recognized that which styled itself the constitutional. Though weakened by this cause, the church made vigorous efforts to grow. The Rev. William Hill was the first pastor, and filled the office until the winter of 1843, when he was deposed by his Presbytery for what was deemed heretical doc- trine on the subject of Christian perfection. After a vacancy of some months, the Rev. John H. Lewis became the pastor, and discharged the duties of the office very acceptably until called to Bethlehem in 1845. He was succeeded, for a short time, by the Rev. J. C. Beach, and next by the Rev. John Gray who remained as supply until the spring of 2851, when a division arose in the congregation on the ques- tion of his settlement as pastor. Before this matter was adjusted, a vote of the church was taken, and, by a majority of one, it was re- solved no longer to receive sup- plies. This vote closed the doors of the meeting house and virtu- ally disbanded the society, which had never become strong. In 1840-41, the society erect- ed the meeting house at the comer of High street and West- ern avenue, at a cost of $6,600, in which divine worship was ob- served until the church ceased to exist. The building was de- signed to accommodate about six hundred persons. It was second PRESBYTERIAN church—1841. sold, in 1852, to the Second Methodist Episcopal church. CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. The circumstances which led to the organization of this congrega- tion, as well as its subsequent history, are briefly stated in a historical sketch which was published by the trustees, in connection with their annual report, August 1857. In this paper it is said that the Rev. S. H. McMullin, who had served as supply during the illness of the pastor of the First Presbyterian Church, performed the duties of his engagement until about three months after Dr. Johnston’s death. After hearing several other candidates for the vacant pastorate, “ a day was fixpd,” says the sketch to which reference is made, “ on which, ac-304 HIS TOM Y OF NEWBURGH. cording to notice given, the congregation were to select a pastor. When, however, all had assembled, a question arose as to whether females should be permitted to vote, which was decided in the affirm- ative. The vote was taken and resulted, one hundred for Mr. McMul- lin and seventy-four for another person. Messrs. William K. Mailler and Robert Sterling were then appointed commissioners to prosecute the call before the Presbytery; and the meeting adjourned. “ At the meeting of the Presbytery, when the call was considered, a remonstrance was presented, by the minority of the congregation, against the settlement of Mr. McMullin. In consequence of this re- monstrance, the Presbytery intimated to the commissioners that they would not, in all probability, permit the call to be prosecuted; and it was withdrawn without any formal action being taken. “Immediately after the return of the commissioners, a meeting of the congregation was held to hear their report; when it was resolved, by a majority of votes present, “that the commissioners be*directed to prosecute the call.” The Presbytery, however, continued to regard the call as inexpedient; and a meeting, called for the purpose of its consideration, failed to accomplish the result desired. “The situation of affairs becoming known, the following paper asking for certificates of membership and dismission, was presented to the Session of the Church on the 27th day of August: “ To the Session of the First Presbyterian Church of the Village of Newburgh: The undersigned, members in full communion of the First Presbyterian Church of the Village of Newburgh, do hereby respectfully request you to grant them certificates of membership and dismission, for the purpose of being organized into a Church, to be known as the—-----Presbyterian Church of the Village of Newburgh: John McClelland, Mary Albertson, . E. L. Spalding, Eliza Rogers, Abigail W. McClelland,Alexander Hargrave, Catharine Sly, Jerusha Gerard, James C. McClelland, Mary Ann Hargrave, M. W. N. Johnston, Sarah Ludlow, Sally R. Logan, Abby L. Scott, J. Ferguson, Sarah McElrath, Anna Pettie, AnnaM. Clugston, Margaret Strachan, Amanda L. DuBois, Amelia BirdsaU, Wm. G. Gillespie, Wm. McClughan, Mary D. McClughan, Hannah Andruss, Mary Burnett, Catharine Hamilton, Anna E. Roe, Robert Wallace, Mary Ann Wallace, Mary G. Starr, Eliza. P. Spier, Sarah Waugh, L. Bradford, Eunice McKune, Rebecca Brown, Elizabeth Blake. Delia Smith, Hugh S. Banks, Rosalie H. Banks, Hugh McKissock, Agnes McKissock, Laura A. Gorham, Rachael Clugston, Sarah Hildreth, “ On the first day of September, 1856, the church Extension Com- mittee of the Presbytery of North River, met in the session room of the First Presbyterian church: Present—B. T. Phillips, Wm. H. Kirk, F. T. Williams, ministers; and Peter V. B. Fowler and Benj. Tyler, elders. The petition of the persons above named was presented, asking to be organized into a Presbyterian cfiurch, to be known as “ The Calvary Presbyterian Church of Newburgh;” and, after the ex- amination of their certificates, it was, on motion, “Resolved, That the request be granted.” The applicants then formally agreed and cove- nanted to walk together in a church relation, according to the ac-CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 305 knowledged doctrine and order of tlie Presbyterian church. Messrs. Wm. G. Gillespie and John McClelland were then unanimously elected ruling elders, by the congregation. Mr. Gillespie was duly ordained; and Mr. McClelland and Mr. Gillespie (the former having previously served as an elder in the First Presbyterian church) were formally installed as elders of the Calvary Presbyterian church of Newburgh. “ On the 15th day of September, Rev. S. H. McMullin was unani- mously elected pastor of the church. The call was presented to him at a meeting of the Presbytery, held at Buttermilk Falls on Tuesday, October 7th, and accepted by him; and, on the 16th day of the same month, he was ordained to the work of the Gospel ministry, and in- stalled pastor of the church, in the Court-house at Newburgh. The services on the occasion were conducted by Rev. Dr. Jones of Phila- delphia, who preached the sermon; Rev. E. K. Brower, who offered the ordaining prayer and proposed the constitutional questions; Rev. B. T. Phillips, who gave the charge to the people; and Rev. F. R. Masters, who gave the charge to the pastor. “ On the 20th October, an election for trustees was held in the Court- ' house—elders John McClelland and Wm. G. Gillespie presiding— which resulted in the choice of Messrs. Moses Upright, Wm. K. Mailler, Walter H. Gorham, Wessel S. Gerard, Peter Ward and Charles Johnston. “ The first meeting of the Session of the church was held on Friday evening, October 17th, at the residence of Mrs. C. Sly, in High street. At the meeting of the Session, on the 31st October, the following per- sons were admitted on profession of faith: Mrs. E. C. Gillespie, Mrs. M. A. Casement, Miss M. Casement; and the following by certificate: Asa Sterling, Wm. K. Mailler, Susan A. Jessup, Julianna Tyler, Phoebe E. Sterling, Hannah P. Mailler, Margaret Shields, Mary Boyd,' Margaret Sterling, Mary E. Halstead, Jane Shields, Manetta'Watkins, Mary Sterling, Zipporah Clark, John Little, Jane Ellen Roe, Nancy Sterling, Ann Barr, Ann Little, Maria Minor, Robert Sterling, Jphn L. Westervelt, Isabella M. McMullin, Deborah Blake, Maria Sterling, Catharine Westervelt, Benj. Tyler, Wm,and Sarah Gervin. “The first communion of the church was celebrated on the first Sabbath in November, 1856, at which time the membership had reached eighty-one. “ Soon after the organization of the church, it was determined to erect a suitable edifice—the public services, in the meantime, being held in the Court-house. A subscription was opened and a sufficient sum subscribed, during the winter of 1856, to justify the trustees in purchasing a site on Liberty street, and procuring a plan for the building. From different plans which were submitted, one drawn by Messrs. Gerard & Boyd was selected; and estimates having been in- vited, the contract for erecting the building was awarded to Mr. John 020306 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Little. A building committee of three trustees, viz: Messrs. Mailler, Gorham and Ward, was appointed; and Mr. Withers, architect, was engaged to superintend the work. The ground was broken in the month of April, 1857 ; and the corner-stone laid, with appropriate exercises, on the 9th of July following, at 2 P. M. The services com- menced by singing the hymn entitled, “Beyond the starry skies.” Rev. Dr. McLaren followed with a very appropriate address to the Throne of Grace, and a portion of the Scriptures was read by the Rev. Dr. McCarrell. Chas. Johnston, on behalf of the trustees, then read a statement showing the organization and progress of the church, which was followed by the hymn, “Let every heart rejoice and sing.” The Rev. Mr. Crowell, of Philadelphia, then delivered an address, which was followed by the laying of the corner-stone by the Rev. Dr. Forsyth, who, on account of the ill health of Mr. Mc- Mullin, had been selected by the trustees for that duty. Dr. For- syth introduced the ceremony by a short address, and was followed by Rev. Alex. R. Thompson. The exercises closed with an anthem by the choir, and the benediction by Dr. Forsyth. The building was dedicated on the 24th of February, 1858. The servi- ces were opened by an anthem by the choir, and in- vocation by the CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH—1858. pastor. The ReV. Dr. Sprole then read a selection from the Scriptures, which was follow- ed by singing the": 504th hymn. Prayer was then offered by Rev. Dr. McCarrell, and the 502d hymn sung. Rev. Dr. Murray, of Elizabeth,CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 307 N. J., then delivered a discourse from 1st Kings, vi :4, and vii:63. At the conclusion, the congregation arose, and, with impressive words, the speaker dedicated the house to the worship of God. The services were concluded with prayer by the pastor, and the singing of a hymn. “The style of the church edifice is that sometimes known among architects as Flemish, having, however, many of the peculiarities of the Gothic. It has a front of 56 feet on Liberty street, running back to the depth of 96 feet, with a lecture-room in the rear. The audi- ence room is 72 by 52 feet—the lecture-room 62 by 22 feet. The aspect of the interior is that of severe simplicity. A trestle-work supports the roof, obviating the necessity of pillars, thus affording an unobstructed view from every part of the house. All the wood-work is grained, the pews being of chestnut oiled and grained so as to re- tain the natural color and grain of the wood; and the finish through- out has a pleasing effect. The cost of the building, lot, fencing, fur- niture, &c., was about $21,500.” Mr. McMullin continued in pastoral relation with the church until January 24, 1860, when, in consequence of ill health, he tendered his resignation, to take effect May following. On the 19th December, of the same year, Bev. Judson H. Hopkins was installed, and subse- quently served until July, 1864, when, at his request the relation was dissolved. He was without a successor until March, 1866, when the Bev. George S. Bishop, of Trenton, N. J., was installed, and contin- ued in the relation until October, 1872, when, at his own request, and by consent of the church, he was relieved of the charge by the Pres- bytery. His successor, Bev. Jeremiah Searle, of Peekskill, was elected in February, and installed May 6, 1873. To its real estate the society added, in 1867, a parsonage at4 a cost of $9,000; and, to its appointments, during the pastbrate of Bev. Mr. Bishop, an organ and a bell. UNION PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. This church was founded July 13, 1837, by a colony of twenty- seven persons who belonged to the First Associate Beformed Church. Their names are as follows: E. W. Farrington, Mrs. Farrington, Thornton M. Niven, Mrs. Niven, John Wise, Mrs. Wise, John Beveridge, Mrs. Beveridge, Arnold McNear, Mrs. McNear, James Johnson, Mrs. Johnson, Matthew Sims, Mrs. Sims, James Blacklaw, Mrs. BlacSlaw, James Danskin, Mrs. Danskin, Stewart Kelly, Mrs. Kelly, John James Monell, Miss E. Cypher, Mrs. E. Purdy, Miss C. Anderson. Mrs. Catharine Stewart Mrs. N. Barclay, The meeting for organization was held in the First Associate Be- formed church (July 13), and was conducted by Bev. Dr. McJimpsey and Bev. James Mairs, constituting a committee of the Presbytery. The sermon was by Dr. McJimpsey from John xvi:7. The following308 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH persons were elected as ruling elders, viz: John Beveridge, E. Ward Farrington, Thornton M. Niven, John Wise. „On the 5th of Decem- ber following, the Bev. John Forsyth, Jr., was installed pastor—the services being held in the Academy, where the congregation met for worshipluntil the completion of the church edifice. The Bev. Dr. McJimpsey preached the sermon; the Bev. Drs. Wallace and McLaren gave the charges to the people and the pastor. A church edifice was erected on a lot at the corner of Water and Clinton streets, which had been given to the congregation for this purpose. Ground was broken on the 27th July, 1837, and the building was dedicated on the 1st day of May, 1838, when a suitable sermon was delivered by the Bev. Dr. M. N. McLaren, then of Hamptonburgh. Here the congregation continued to worship until March, 1859, when the property was sold to the rector and vestry of St. George’s church. The last time it was used by Union church, the sermon was preached by the first pastor, Dr. Forsyth. Dr. Forsyth was elected to a professorship in the College of New Jersey at the end of the year 1848, but he did not retire from the pas- torate until near the autumn of 1847. He was succeeded by Mr. Abraham B. Van* Nest, a recent graduate of the Theological Seminary at New Brunswick, who was ordained and installed pastor on the 20th of June, 1848. Mr. Van Nest ermained here about a year. He was called by the Beformed Dutch church, 21st street, New York, and having accepted the invitation he removed thither in the spring of 1849. Almost immediately upon his departure, the Bev. Dr. Bobert McCartee, formerly of Canal street church, but at this time of Goshen, was called, and, having accepted the invitation, was installed Aug. 17, 1849. Dr. McCartee labored here with great acceptance and success until 1855, when he removed to New York to take the pastorate of the 25th street A. B. church. Union church was supplied by various persons during the first six months or more after Dr. Mc- Cartee’s removal, particularly by the Bev. Mr. Cunningham. Finally, the Bev. Mr. Jack—who had graduated in the Seminary in the spring of 1856—was called, ordained, and installed June 2d, 1856, “by theCHURCHES, SCHOOLS,, ETC. 309 Presbytery of New York. On this occasion the sermon was preached by the Rev. John Brash, of New York, who also proposed the usual questions to the candidate, and offered the ordaining prayer. The charge to the pastor was given by the Rev. G. M. McEachron of Mon- gaup Valley; and that to the people by Rev. Dr. Forsyth. Mr. Jack was succeeded in 1869, by Rev. Wendell Prime, and the latter by Rev. C. C. Hall who was ordained and installed December 2d, 1875. In October, 1859, in consequence of the union of the Associate Re- formed and the Associate churches, out of which the United Presby- terian church grew, the congregation of Union church was induced to unite with the Old School branch of the Presbyterian church, and is now a component part of that body. The old First Presbyterian edifice was purchased in March, 1859, by the Union church, and was occupied by the society until July, 1871, when it was removed to give place to the present edifice. The work of removal was begun on the 5th of July, 1871, and on the 13th the last timbers of the old house were prostrated.* The corner-stone of the new edifice was laid on Friday, Sept. 15th, following. The exer- cises were conducted by the Masonic fraternity, G. Fred Wiltsie officiating as Grand Master of the “ Grand Lodge of Ceremony.’5 The dedication was on Tuesday, Sept. 24th, 1872, on which occasion the service was opened with prayer by Rev. Dr. Forsyth. Rev. Dr. Ormiston read the 48th Psalm, and the Rev. Wendell Prime the ded- icatory prayer. The discourse was by the Rev. Dr. Hall, from 2 Peter iii-—2; the closing prayer by Rev. J. B. Wakeley.f The edifice is of Gothic architecture from plans by Elkanah K. Shaw, of Newburgh. It is in the form of a T, and embraces an aud- itorium with gallery and Sabbath-school and lecture rooms. The auditorium fronting on First street, is 61 feet wide by 68 feet deep, 30 feet ceiling, and has, with the gallery, a seating capacity of 1000. The Sabbath-school room, fronting on Montgomery street, is 33 by 81 feet, 22 feet ceiling, with seating for 600 pupils. The lecture-room is 27 by 57 feet, 15 feet ceiling, seating 300—total seating capacity 1900. The windows throughout are of stained glass; the painting is in fresco; the pews of chestnut-walnut oiled, and the entire finish cheerful. The walls of the building are of hard smooth brick with brown-stone trimmings. The First street front has two towers 18x18, the east 100, and the west 75 feet in height; the former contains the * “ On Thursday, July 13th, 1871, at precisely 10 o’clock in the morning, our old church yielded its last “ bent ’’ to the workmen engaged in its removal, and it is now numbered with the things that were.”—Index. t While the procession was entering the church the quartet choir sang J. Ernest Per- ring’s ordination anthem, “How beautiful upon the mountains.” The organist was Chas. B. Ruttenber, of St. George’s church, and the following vocalists: soprano, Miss Julia Alexander, of Poughkeepsie; alto, Miss Josephine Hoase, of Newburgh; tenor, Prof, Cromwell, of Fishkill; basso, Mr. J. W. Stratton, of Newburgh.”—Journal.310 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. bell and the city clock. The contracts for construction were executed by Thos. Shaw & Sons, carpenters, for $18,000, and Thomas Dobbin, mason, for $23,000; in addition to which sums about $19,000 was expended for furniture, carpets, furnaces, gas and water fixtures, etc., making the total cost $60,000. The organ (Eeuben Midmer, builder,) was the gift of John Galt and John G. Wilkinson. Its cost, including painting, was about $5,000. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, MIDDLEHOPE. The project of building a Presbyterian church at Middlehope was proposed in January, 1859, and was readily embraced by several of the active members of the Presbyterian church at Marlborough. The enterprise having received sufficient encouragement to warrant further* proceedings, a meeting was held (March 12,) at which Nathaniel T. Hawkins, Peter Y. B. Fowler, Jas. Bodman, and Jas. O. Conklin, were appointed “to contract for and build a church, and to take such measures to raise funds and to carry out and finish the work as they may think proper.” This com- mittee soon after awarded the contract for building to Jas. D. Purdy, and that for painting to Ward & Leon- ard. The building was com- pleted in September, 1859, and dedicated on the 6th of October, at an adjourn- ed meeting of the Presby- tery of North Liver. The dedicatory sermon was delivered by Rev. W. T. Sprole, D. D., reading of the Scriptures by Rev. B. T. Phfllips, and the dedicatory prayer by Rev. S. H. Jagger. The building is 30x 40 feet, with a lobby 8x20 feet. Its cost, including furniture, was about $2,500. FIRST ASSOCIATE REFORMED CHURCH. Until near the close of the last century, the adherents of the Asso- ciate Reformed church resident in Newburgh, were connected with the church of Little Britain, which was founded in 1758. Measures were taken to gather a congregation in 1797; and a church was formed consisting of the following persons, viz: Hugh Walsh, and his wife, Catharine Walsh; Daniel Niven, and his wife, Jane Niven; Robert Royd, and his wife, Eleanor Boyd; Janet Boyd; Robert Gourlay, and his wife, Margaret Gourlay; Derick Amerman; RobertCHURCHES, SCHOOLS. ETC. 311 W. Jones; Elizabeth Belknap, wife of Isaac Belknap; Samuel Bel- knap; Hugh Spier; Alex. Telford, and George Telford. The exer- cises in connection with the formal organization of the church were probably conducted by the Rev. Thos. G. Smith, at that time pastor of Little Britain. The legal incorporation of the congregation did not take place until Eeb. 7th, 1803, when Messrs. Derick Amerman, Hugh Walsh, Daniel Niven, Robert Gourlay, Robert Boyd, John Brown, Isaac Bel- knap, Jr., John Colter, and Robert W. Jones were elected trustees. The ruling elders at this period were Daniel Niven, Samuel Belknap, Hugh Spier, John Shaw, and Derick Amerman. The first pastor of the church was the Rev. Robert Kerr, who is reported to have been a preacher of more than usual ability. He was a native of Ireland, and had been settled in the ministry in that country. He came to the United States in 1797, and was received by the Associate Reformed Presbytery of New York, on the 10th of Oc- tober, 1797, and probably began his labors in Newburgh at that time, as steps were taken at that meeting of Presbytery to give him a reg- ular call. He was installed pastor on the 6th of April, 1799. Here- signed his charge on the 14th January, 1802. He subsequently re- moved to the south, and labored C£ with great diligence, approbation and success ” within the bounds of the Associate Reformed Synod of Carolina, until his death, which occurred in Savannah, 11th June, 1805, when on his way to the General Synod. Mr. Kerr was succeeded by the Rev. James Scrimgeour, who was installed as pastor on the 11th August, 1803. He was a native of Scotland, and had been settled in the ministry for seven or eight years at North Berwick. The loss of health obliged him to resign his charge and the work of his profession for some years. Up to this time he had been one of the most popular preachers in Scotland. Having recovered his health in a good degree, he was induced by the Rev. Dr. John M. Mason to emigrate to America in 1802. He re- mained in the pastoral care of the church of Newburgh until 1812, when he accepted a call to Little Britain and was installed there on the 24th of June of that year. In this charge he remained until his death in 1825.* * The following obituary is from the Political Index of February 15, 1825: “ Departed this life on Friday morning, the 14th of Feb., Rev. James Scrimgeour, minister Of the gospel at Little Britain, in the 68th year of his age. He studied theology under the direction of John Brown, of Haddington, and was settled as pastor of a congregation in the Burger connexion, at North Berwick. He was one of the ministers that came to this country with Dr. Mason, at the instance of the Associate Reformed Synod in the year 1802. In August, 1803, he accepted a call from the Associate Reformed congregation at Newburgh, and was for some time pastor of that congregation. The last twelve years of his ministry and of his life, were spent in Little Britain, having been called by that con- gregation, and installed in this charge, the 24th of Jan., 1812. As a man he was frank, sincere and friendly—as a son, a husband and a father, faithful and affectionate,”312 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. A vacancy occurred after Mr. Scrimgeour’s removal, of about four years, during which time various unsuccessful efforts were made to obtain a pastor. Calls were addressed to Rev. Robert McCartee, and to Rev. John Knox, then licentiates and graduates of the Theological Seminary; but finally an invitation was given to the Rev. Arthur I. Stansbury, which he accepted, and he was installed 4th December* 1816. Mr. Stansbury’s pastorate was very brief. He resigned his charge in April, 1818, having accepted a call to the First Presbyterian church of Albany. The Rev. James Chrystie, minister of the Re- formed Dutch church of Union Tillage, Washington county, having been invited to succeed Mr. Stansbury, accepted the call, and was in- stalled 20th September, 1818. He remained as pastor, winning the warm attachment of the congregation, until October, 1821, when he joined the Reformed Presbyterian church and removed to Albany. His successor, the late Rev. Dr. McCarrell, commenced his labors here as a supply on the 4th Dec. 1822. He was ordained and installed pas- tor, 14th March, 1823. The sermon was by the Rev: Dr. John McJimpsey; the ordination prayer was offered by the Rev. James Scrimgeour; the charges to pastor and people were delivered by the Rev. James Mairs, of Galway, N. Y. Dr. McCarrell faithfully dis- charged the duties of his office until his death. His successor, the Rev. Thomas T. Farrington, began his labors the 1st of July, 1869, and continued until his death, June, 1875. He was succeeded by the Rev. Jno. McNaughton, December 24th, 1875. . The first edifice occupied by the church was erected on a lot given by James Renwick, of New York, and which now forms part of the farm of the late Capt. Henry Robinson. The church stood a little to the north and west of the gambrel-roofed house—with its side to the river—which forms so conspicuous an object on the hill west of the ship-yards. It was surrounded by magnificent old apple and pear trees, and in form was very similar to the First Presbyterian church at that time—having a square tower on the south end. Mr. Renwick deeded the lot, which was 200 feet square, to William Renwick, Dr. John Kemp, Rev. John M. Mason, Alexander Robertson, Alexander Hosack, John Turner, Jr., George Lindsay, Robert Gosman, of the city of New York; and Hugh Walsh, George Gardner, Robert Gour- lay, Daniel Niven, Robert Boyd, Robert Ferguson, Thomas Tait, Robert W. Jones, and Alexander Murray, of Newburgh as “Trustees appointed by the said James Renwick, for the Presbyterian church of Newburgh in connection with the Associate (Reformed) Synod in the U. States of America,—for the sole use and intent that the trustees and members of said church should erect a church for Christian wor- ship, and also a school-house for the instruction of youth.” TheCHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC, 313 church was completed in 1798,* but no effort was ever made to erect a school-house, the locality being wholly unsuited for such an edifice. As the growth of the village was more towards the north than the south, the church came to be quite out of town, and very inconveni- ently located for the great mass of its members. Accordingly, in 1821, measures were taken towards the erection of a new church within the vil- lage; the old building was taken down in the year just named, and while the new one was being built the congrega- tion met for worship in the old court- room in the Academy. The present edi- fice was dedicated with appropriate ser- vices on the 4th of January, 1822, on which occasion the Rev. James Scrim- geour preached from Hosea viii :17. The lot on which the church was erected was the gift of Hugh Walsh, one of the foun- ders of the society, who also gave the associate kef. church—1835. largest portion of the lot on which the parsonage stands and which was erected upon it in 1820. Internally, the church is unaltered, but externally some change has been made since its erection. The cupola was completed in 1834 and a bell procured. The lecture-room on the north side of the church was built about 1840. FIRST REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. The origin of this congregation may be traced to the self-denying exertions of a few individuals in the communion pf the Reformed Presbyterian church, who settled in the village of Newburgh and vicinity during the early part of the century, among whom were James Clark, O. Gailey, and Robert Johnston. A society for prayer and other devotional services was formed and regularly attended as early as 1816 or T7, which proved the means of gathering together and combining the efforts of a sufficient number to warrant an appli- cation for occasional preaching. Prom 1817 until 1824, the society was supplied with preaching by the Rev. J. R. Willson, D. D., at that * There is an anecdote connected with the building of this church edifice, which, as it shows a heart to have been in the right place, we relate. When the building was beings finished, the trustees and others could not agree about placing a window in the garret: some wanted it on the ground of appearance; some that it would ventilate and preserve the building; others objected to the expense and that it was not needed—one suggested that a blind or fgjse window would answer all purposes of appearance and cost compara- tively nothing. Daniel Niven, Esq., in reply to this last proposition said, “ that as long as he had anything to do with the church there should be no more hypocrisy outside than inside of it.” The argument was closed, and a very large window, more expensive than any in the building, placed in the garret. When this edifice was taken down, the large window was preserved, and it now lies in the garret of the new church, embalmed in the pious fragrance of the above remark.—Eager's Orange County, 213.314 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH time pastor at Coldenham. Increasing in numbers, and desirous of obtaining a fuller supply of ordinances, the members of the New- burgh branch of the Coldenham congregation, as it came to be called, were, by deed of Presbytery, separated from the Coldenham congre- gation and, in 1824, organized as a distinct church, of which Samuel Wright and John Lawson were elders, and William M. Wiley and John Crawford, deacons. Soon after the organization, Matthew Duke was added to the elders, and William Thompson to the deacons. The first pastor of the church was the Rev. Jas. R. Johnston, who was ordained and installed in 1825. His connection with it was dis- solved in 1829. On the 8th of June, 1830, the Rev. Moses Rooney became his successor, and served with great acceptance until 1848, when he was compelled to resign on account of failing health. On the 14th November, 1849, the present pastor, the Rev. Samuel Car- lisle, was installed. The society held its first public ser- vices in the Academy. Arrangements were made for the erection of a church edifice in 1818, which was completed the following year and is still occu- pied by the congregation. In 1852, it was rebuilt, during which time the public services of the congregation were held in the Court-house. It af- first ref. pres, church—1852. ords accommodations for about five hundred persons. It is without architectural features of special note. SECOND REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. The Second Reformed Presbyterian church of Newburgh was organ- ized by a commission of the New York Presbytery, on the 12th De- cember, 1854. The original membership was composed of William Thompson, James Frazier and William Johnston, elders; John Law- son and James Hilton, deacons, and twenty-six private members. In accordance with a call made by the congregation, the Rev. J. Renwick Thompson, the present pastor, was installed Dec. 19, 1855. The public services of the church were first held in the Court-house. Ar- rangements for the erection of a church ^Y edifice, however, were made soon after the organization, and the building was | completed in November, 1855, and dedi- cated on the 25th of that month. The ' ___________ rnomiug services were conducted by the SE0*REF- fres. church—1855. Rev. Dr. Christy, of New York, who delivered an able lecture on theCHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 315 12th chapter of Isaiah. In the afternoon, the discourse was by the pastor of the church, from Genesis xxyiii:17; and the evening services were conducted by Dr. Christy. The church building, originally without much architectural character, was improved by the addition of a tower, etc., in 1872, at a cost of $3,400 It is of brick, and has accommodations for six hundred persons. FIRST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. On the 25th May, 1858, a union, with reference to which negotia- tions had long been pending, was consummated at Pittsburg, Pa., between the two branches of the Presbyterian family known as the “Associate” and the “Associate Reformed” churches, under the title of the “United Presbyterian Church of North America.” The two Associate Reformed congregations of Newburgh declined to enter this union. The friends of the united church, in these congregations, be- lieving that the union was right, and an important step toward the unity of the church, petitioned (Nov. 9,1859,) the New York Presby- tery of the United Presbyterian church, for the constitution of a congregation to be known as the “First United Presbyterian Church of Newburgh.” This petition having been granted, Rev. Alexander McWilliams was appointed by the Presbytery to organize the church, which then embraced 36 members.. George Gearns, George Lendrum, John Geddes, Sr., and Dr. Matthew Stevenson, were elected ruling elders, and Andrew Johnston, B. W. Chambers, Thomas M. McCann, Jas. S. Strachan, Robert Hyndman, George Lendrum, George Gearns, John Geddes, Sr., and John Brown were chosen as trustees, and the society organized Dec. 6th, 1859. On the 31st December, the trustees purchased the edifice then occupied by the Baptist church, situated on Montgomery street (comer of Fourth), where the congregation has since held public worship. It was enlarged and improved during the summer of 1871, at a cost of about eighteen hundred dollars. The first pastor of the church was Rev. Robert Armstrong, formerly of Philadelphia, Pa. He was installed March 12, 1861, and contin- ued in the office until Oct. 21, 1868, when he was released from the charge. The present pastor, # Rev. J. G. D. Findley, was ordained and installed on the 14th of October, 1869. On the 21st April, 1862, Messrs. George Guy, Thomas M. McCann and Andrew Johnston, were ordained and installed as ruling elders in the congregation. AMERICAN REFORMED CHURCH. The history of this church dates from October, 1834, when the Rev. Wm. Cruiekshank, on the application of some of the members of the Reformed Dutch church in the city of New York, was induced to visit Newburgh and undertake the establishment of a church. His efforts were successful, and, on the 24th February following, the church was316 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH formally organized by the Classis of Orange, at which time Isaac Bel- knap, Thomas G. Stansborough, Isaac A. Knevels, and John. W. Knevels, were ordained elders; and Cornelius Bogardus, Thos. Jessup, Daniel Corwin, and Albert Wells, deacons. Eighteen persons were then received into its communion by certificate. On the 13th of April, 1835, the Consistory invited the Bev. William Cruickshank to become their pastor; and the call having been ap- proved by the Classis of Orange, he was installed as the first pastor of the church on the 22d October of the same year. In December, 1837, Mr. Cruickshank resigned; and, on the 13th of June, 1838, a call was addressed to the Bev. Isaac M. Fisher, which was accepted, and he was installed in July. He remained pastor only until the 5th of October of the same year, when he resigned, on account of failing health. On the 17th of May, 1833, the Bev. F. H. Yanderveer was called, and continued the pastor of the church until the 19th August, 1842, when he resigned. On the 13th September, 1842, a call was made upon the Bev. A. B. Yan Zandt, and he was installed by a depu- tation of the Classis of Orange on the 14th of December following. He resigned in June, 1849; and was succeeded by the Bev. Malcolm N. McLaren, who was installed Nov. 12th, 1850.* He resigned the charge Feb. 5th, 1859, and on the 14th of June, a call was made upon the Bev. G. H. Mandeville, of Flushing, L. I., who entered upon the duties of pastor August 21st, of the same year.f He resigned Nov. 1st, 1869. Bev. W. H. Gleason, the present pastor, was called on the 9th of April, and installed in May, 1870. The church was organized in the First Associate Beformed church J edifice; and its subsequent meetings, until the completion of the build- ing now occupied by it, were held in the Academy. Mr. Cruickshank, the first pastor, devoted all his energies to the interests of the infant * The Key. Malcolm N. McLaren was installed as Pastor of the Reformed Dutch Church in this place on Tuesday evening last. The introductory exercise was the chanting of the i9th Psalm; this was followed by reading of the Scripture and a very appropriate prayer by the Rev. Mr. Schoonmaker. The hymn, “ Go preach my gospel, saith the Lord,” was sung; and the sermon was then delivered by the Rev. Mr. Alliger from 1st Cor. 2:4—“ My preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.” The choir then sung, “ Come in, thou blessed of the Lord, Oh come, in Jesus’ precious name; We welcome thee with one accord. And trust the Saviour does the same.” The installing form was read by the Rev. Mr. Lee, after which was sung a quartette and chorus, “ How beautiful are them that preach the gospel of peace; that bring glad tidings of good things. Let thy priests, O God, be clothed with salvation and let thy saints rejoice in goodness.” Then followed the Doxology, “Praise God from whom all blessings flow,” and the exercises closed with the benediction.— Gazette, Nov. 19,1850. f During the vacancy between the resignation of Dr. McLaren and the installation of Mr. Mandeville, and subsequently during the vacancy between Mr. Mandeville’s resignation and Mr,. Gleason’s installation, the pastoral duties of the church were performed by the Rev. John Forsyth, D. D. j: The services on this occasion were conducted by the Rev. F. H. Yanderveer, who de- livered the sermon, and by the Rev. Samuel Yan Yechten, who addressed the members and congregation.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 317 church, and its early success was due, in a great measure, to his inde- fatigable exertions. He obtained from his congregation, and from New York, a handsome subscription for the erection of a church edi- fice; the site for which was selected on the corner of Grand and Third streets. The building was commenced about October 1st, 1835; the corner-stone was laid Oct. 22d.* Mr. Warren, of New York, was the architect, and Gerard & Halsey, masons, and A. Whitmarsh, carpen- ters, were the contractors. — Service was first held in the basement on Sunday, Nov. 13,1837,t and on the 7th December fol- lowing the edi- fice was dedi- cated. % The financial diffi- culties of 1837, seriously affec- ted the tempo- ral interests of AMERICAN reformed church—1860. the church; and the Consistory were compelled to submit to a sale of the church property (April, 1839), which was purchased by Mr. * Rev. Wm. Cruickshank was installed October 22d, 1835. Key. J. H. Bevier, of Sha- wangunk preached from Isaiah lxii—6. The services were held in the Academy building, then occupied by the church for its regular worship. After the installation, the congre- gation moved in procession to the foundation walls of the church, preceded by the archi- tect, builders, clergy, &c., presenting a handsome sight. The corner-stone was then laid. Rev. Wm. Cruickshank first read a history of the organization of the Church, and a list of papers, &c., which had been placed in the box prepared for the occasion. Rev. Wm. S. Heyer offered prayer. The box was then put into the place made for it by Elder Isaac Belknap, who made some feeling remarks. Rev. Doct. Brodhead then delivered an ad- dress, standing on the top of the stone buttress. Rev. Thomas DeWitt, D. D., followed in an address which called up the deep feelings of the heart and carried the imagination from the earthly to the heavenly temple. Services concluded by prayer and benediction by Rev. Seymour Landon of the M. E, Church.—Christian Intelligencer, Oct. 31,1835. t The basement room of the noble and imposing edifice erected by the Reformed Dutch congregation of this Village, was opened for public worship last Sunday morning. The services were performed by the pastor, the Rev. Mr. Gruickshank, who, in the early part of the services, solemnly dedicated it to the service of Almighty God, as a place of social grayer, for Sabbath School instruction, and for lectures, or the" exposition of the sacred cnptures. — Telegraph, Nov. 17, 1837. X The Reformed Dutch Church of this Village was, on Thursday last, dedicated with ap- propriate and interesting ceremonies. The beautiful edifice—interior and exterior—was a subject of admiration to a very large concourse of people assembled on the occasion. The services consisted of a dedicatory address by Rev. Wm. Cruickshank; and a sermon by Rev. Thomas DeWitt, D. D., from Psalms lxxxvii: 3. Rev. R. P. Lee, Rev. Wm. S. Heyer, and Rev. F. H. Vanderveer, engaged in other parts of the services of the day. Yesterday a sale of pews took place, the proceeds of which amounted to about $3,000.— Telegraph, Dec. 14, 1837.318 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Daniel Farrington, on behalf of the creditors for the sum of $10,053. An arrangement, however, was soon after effected by which Matthew V. B. Fowler became the purchaser of the property in trust for the church. The debt was greatly reduced, and, in 1849, the Consistory was enabled to resume the title. The church edifice is of Grecian architecture. It is built of stone stuccoed and was originally 50x80 feet with a portico of 20 feet, making a total depth 100 feet; the roof was surmounted by a massive dome, which formed a prominent feature in the landscape. The style of architecture was continued in the interior and gave to the audito- rium a cold massive grandeur. The first cost, including lot, etc., was about $20,000. The dome proved troublesome and was removed; the acoustics of the auditorium were bad, and led to a recessed pulpit. During the year 1851, the parsonage was built on the east side of the lot on Third street, at a cost of $3,277. It has since been enlarged and improved at a cost of about $5,000. The church edifice was en- larged, in the fall and winter of 1867-’68, by the addition of a tran- sept in the rear 15x22 feet on each side and 20 feet high, giving an audience room 100 feet in depth and 82 feet in width at transept. The improvements were from plans by J. E. Harney, architect, and, including frescoing, grading, &c., involved an expenditure of about $20,000. It was reopened for service April 19, 1868. Its seating capacity (including gallery) is now about 1000. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH. The first Baptist church of Newburgh was the offspring of the Baptist church at Fishkill. From 1740 to 1780, the Kev. Mr. Hal- stead, then pastor of the church at Fishkill, performed missionary labors at different places in Duchess and Ulster counties; and, in 1782, succeeded in organizing a branch of the society in the precinct of New Marlborough, then recently a portion of the precinct of New- burgh. At a regular meeting of this branch church, held oh the 24th of May, 1785, at the house of Keuben Drake (Elder James 'Phillips presiding), a petition was presented by Nathan Ellet and William Purdy, on behalf of themselves and others, asking that “the society be constituted a separate church, and that Jonathan Atherton be ordained pastor.” The application was granted. The ordination as well as the services constituting the church were held on the 27th of May. The minutes state that Elder Dakens preached the ordina- tion sermon from Timothy iv:8. After prayer by Elder Cole, Elder Dakens gave the charge to the pastor and to the church. “ Elder Phillips gave Bro. Atherton the hand and said, in presence of the whole congregation, that he owned him as an elder; and so Elder Phillips went to prayer. When done, they sang a Psalm, went out,CHURCHES, SCHOOLS,, jETC. 319 and now we are left to ourselves.” The new organization was called the “ Baptist Church of Pleasant Valley/’ and was composed of the following members, viz: John and Mary Lester, Barth, and Hannah Baker, Jediah Atwood, John and Hannah Coller, Jonathan Atherton, Thankful Mackey, Nathan and Mary Ellet, John Gian, Billaga Jones, Josiah and Sarah Baker, Phebe Drake, Abraham Strickland. David and Hannah Martain, William Purdy, The membership increased rapidly, and, in 1789, a branch church was established at Latintown, and another at New Paltz. On the 24th April, 1790, “a number of members were set off by themselves,” and, on the 2d of June following, were constituted the “ Church at New- burgh,” the members of which were: William Brundage, Elder, Gilbert Knilfen, Nathaniel Wyatt, Phebe Merritt, Matthew Oropsey, Elizabeth Ellet, Elizabeth Cosman, Rachel Cropsey, Anna Wyatt, Anna Bloomer, Oliver Cosman, Archibald Ellet. The Church at Newburgh continued in existence until 1817. In the meantime (1803) Elder Luke Davis, a Baptist missionary, raised a small congregation at Eostertown, which was incorporated with the original society. William Brundage served as pastor from 1790 to 1795; Levi Hall from 1796 to 1799, holding service one-third of the time; Jethro Johnson from 1799 to 1803; Luke Davis* from 1803 to 1811; Wm. C. Thompson, a licensed preacher but not an ordained minister, from 1812 to 1815, and John Ellis from 1815 to 1817, whose time was equally divided between the Newburgh and the Pleasant Valley church. On the 18th November, 1817, the two churches were united under the title of the Union Church of Pleasant Valley and New- burgh, and continued in existence down to Dec. 5th, 1840, when the last entry is made in the minutes. From 1817 to 1832, meetings were held alternately at Pleasant Valley, where a church edifice had been erected in 1786, and in the “Stone Meeting House,” as it was * Elder Luke Davis was born in the city of London, where he studied medicine and be- came a druggist. After he emigrated to New York, he engaged in the drug business, pre- scribed for the sick, and was a preacher connected with the Mulberry street Baptist church. From New York he removed to Newburgh, and became the minister of the First Baptist Church. At the time he had three brothers residing in Newburgh, George, Joseph, and Samuel Davis, who subsequently removed to the town of Thompson, Sullivan county. In . their new home they were visited by him and while there preached for them and their neighbors. He was so well liked that he was induced to preach for them once in three weeks during the years 1809,1810 and 1811. He continued to visit Thompson regularly until the summer of 1817, when he became one of its residents. He also labored at Peen- pack, Mamakating Hollow, and Forestburgh. The Baptist church in Thompson was informally organized in the log-house of Enoch Comstock (subsequently and for many years a resident of Newburgh), on the 29th of April, 1811. Its formal organization took place on the 16th of July succeeding, in Nehe- miah Smith’s barn. Elder Davis was the pastor of the flock until 1823, when a difficulty arose with his people, he having permitted the Rev. John Brown, for so many years Rec- tor of St. George’s church, Newburgh, to occupy his pulpit and conduct the service, and committed some other trivial offences against the rules of the church, which led to a sepa- ration. He then returned to New York, became again a preacher of the Mulberry street Baptist church, and resumed his old business of selling drugs. He died .in New York. Dec. 9th, 1852, aged 92 years, leaving two sons Baptist preachers.—Quintan’s History of Sullivan County, 625, etc.320 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. called, in Newburgh. After 1832, meetings were held at Pleasant Valley only, and practically the Newburgh branch of the society closed its existence. The stone meeting house which it occupied, and its burial ground, were on the farm late of John Rodman, near Lup- tondale, on the Newburgh and Shawanguhk plank-road. ‘ The build- ing was about thirty feet square with walls about twenty feet high, ten feet of which were stone, and covered by what is called a barrack roof, rising to about twenty-five feet in the center. It was erected about the year 1806, aud abandoned in 1832. The pulpit was on the west—the entrance on the east. In the adjoining burying- ground liead-stones mark the resting place of many of the founders and supporters of the church, among others of deacon Joseph Cauld- well and of deacon Wm. Winterton. A parsonage house was also a part of the property, and Orange Lake was the baptismal font. No effort appears to have been made to organize a church in the village of Newburgh until 1821. Baptist missionaries, however, fre- quently visited the place, and among others the Rev. Mr. Price, Charles Mais, and Thomas Powell, the latter afterwards or at that time (1820) pastor of the church at Cornwall. In 1817, the Hudson River Baptist Association made, arrangements to supply the village with missionaries for one year. The Rev. Rufus Leonard held the first service under this arrangement in the Academy on the 14th De- cember.* From the records of the present church, it appears, that on Wednesday evening, February 21st, 1821, a meeting was held at the residence of Lydia Ann Hill, for the purpose of consulting in ref- erence to the organization of the church. “ As the result of this meeting, an invitation was sent to Elder Daniel C. Stears to visit the brethren and give them such counsel as circumstances required. On the fourth Wednesday in March following, a committee was appointed to draft articles of faith and covenant, which were presented and adopted at a meeting held on the 11th of April. On the 16th of May, the church was formally organized—Wm. Pierce acting as moderator, and Lewis Leonard as clerk. There were fourteen members at the time of its constitution, five of whom were brethren. This church survived, with all the attending difficulties usual to weak churches, * At a meeting of the Hudson Biver Baptist Association, the following gentlemen agreed to supply their brethren and others who may wish to attend their improvement in the vil- lage of Newburgh, with preaching for one year, viz: Eevds. John Williams, Archibald Maclay, Johnson Chase, Jacob Brouner, Mr. (John) Ellis, Aaron Perkins, Lewis Leonard, Avery Briggs, Joshua Bradley, Chas. G. Somers, Mr. Wiley. Agreeably to the above resolution, the inhabitants of this village are informed that Mr. Leonard will preach in the Court-house (Academy) on Lord’s Day, the 14th of the present month. Exercises to commence at 10 o’clock, A. M. Newburgh, Dec. 9, 1817—Ado. Po- litical Index.CHURCHES,, SCHOOLS, ETC. 321 until July 12, 1828. During its existence forty-four persons united with it, of whom only four were by baptism. The members attached to the church at the time of its dissolution removed their member- ship, and gradually all trace of it vanished.” From 1828 until 1834, there was no Baptist church organization in the village. On the 23d of December, 1834, however, a meeting was held “in the brick meeting house, then owned by the Methodists, for the purpose of organizing a church. There were four ministers pres- ent, viz: Parkinson, Bernard, Martin, and David James. Having re- solved to constitute a church, it was agreed that Elder Parkinson preach the sermon. Elder Martin was appointed clerk. Elder Ber- nard gave the charge, and Elder Parkinson the right hand of fellow- ship. Elder David James was the first pastor of this church, it having been formed under his charge. The number of members at the time of its constitution is said to have been thirteen. At the first church meeting, held Jan. 10, there were present three brethren and seven sisters. The three brethren were David James, the pastor; Wm. Mitchell, deacon, and Joseph Chase, clerk.” Mr. James continued to serve as pastor until January, 1838, when he resigned. The church does not appear to have gained much, in point of numbers, during his ministry. In April, 1838, Elder Spencer accept- ed a call to the pastorate, and served in that capacity until August fol- lowing, when he resigned. The pulpit was temporarily supplied by Elder James until December, when Elder Van Gilder took the charge. He served until July, 1839, when Elder Daniel T. Hill accepted an invitation to supply the pulpit every Sabbath morning. This arrange- ment continued for only a few months. In July, 1840, Elder George Phippen accepted the pastorate and remained in the charge until Nov. 1st, 1842, when he resigned. During his ministry the condition of the society considerably improved. “Some old difficulties were removed, some prejudices which had long existed were broken down, and, as a denomination, some progress was made in gaining a more favorable opinion on the part of the community.” The Rev. C. A. Raymond succeeded Mr. Phippen, and entered upon his duties on the first Sabbath in November, 1842. He was a young man of superior talent and great energy, and under his ministry the church rapidly increased in membership. He resigned the charge in 1844, The Rev. W. S. Clapp, and the Rev. Thos. Applegate,* served the church as supplies until April, 1847. In November of that year, a call was extended to the Rev. James Scott, who entered upon the duties of the pastorate in December, and held the station until Sep- tember 11,1855, when he was removed by death. On the 4th of May, * Father of Rev. Octavius Applegate of St. George’s. 021322 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH—1850. 1856, the Rev. J. H. Castle accepted the vacant pastorate and served until March, 1859. His successor, Rev. Isaac Wescott, entered upon the charge May 1st, 1859, and continued pastor until September 13, 1861. He was succeeded by Rev. G. W. Lasher, who became pastor in March, 1862, and resigned April 25th, 1864. In October of the same year, Rev. Lyman Wright entered upon the pastoral work, con- tinuing in the office until Dec. 31, 1868. His successor was Revi E. W. Bliss, who accepted the pastoral office April 1st, 1869, and re- signed April 1st, 1872. The present pastor, Rev. John Quincy Adams, entered upon his duties April 1st, 1873. After its reorganization _____ in 1834, the church held services in the old McIn- tosh house (formerly in use by St. George’s), and from thence it removed to the old Methodist church on Liberty street, which was purchased by the society. This building was sold, in the spring of 1842, for $925, and on the third Sabbath in May of the same year, the church commenced worship in Washington Hall. In 1849, an edifice was erected on the corner of Montgomery and Third streets (now occupied by the First United Presbyterian society), and opened for public worship in the spring of 1850. In the fall of 1859, the society purchased a site on South street and commenced the erection of the edifice which it now occupies. It is 52 by 90 feet, and is in the Roman style of architecture. The tower and spire are 175 feet high; audience room, 50 by 72 feet in the clear; height of ceiling, 32 feet. The audience room has 156 pews, and will seat about 800. The lecture-room in the basement is 50 by 55 feet, and has 100 pews; it was renovated in 1875. The cost of the build- first baptist churoh—1860. ing and lot was about $19,500.— It is supplied with a baptistery and other modern appointments. ItCHURCHES, SCHOOLS, FTC. 323 was dedicated on Wednesday, August 15,1860, on which occasion Dr. Hague, of New York, preached in the morning, from Ephesians iii:19, and Dr. Gillette in the evening, from Luke ii:49. SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH. In the summer of 1860 (Aug. 12), Mr. John Hagan, Jr., opened a Sunday-school in what was known as the Crystal Palace building, on the north side of Washington street, and immediately thereafter a lot was procured, on the opposite side of the street, and a small frame building erected at a cost of $700. This building was opened Sep- tember 1st, 1860, under the name of the “ Scott Mission School.” In the fall of 1867, a larger building of brick was erected, at a cost of $5,000, and was opened for service on Tuesday, January 14, 1868. Missionaries were employed by the First Baptist church to labor in connection with this mission until June 10th, 1871, when forty-one members were, at their own request, dismissed for the purpose of forming the Second Baptist church, and on September 6, 1871, that body was formally recognized by a Council as an independent church. Rev. John Gray, who had acted as a missionary, was soon after called and ordained to the pastorate, which office hq has filled up to the present time. The church now numbers 45 members. METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHES. The history of the origin of Methodism, and that of its founders, John and Charles Wesley and their associates, is too well known to require notice in these pages. A brief review of the progress of the society in this country, and of the system which was adopted to carry forward its missionary labors, is, however, perhaps necessary to a proper understanding of the manner in which it was introduced in Newburgh. In 1766, a company of Irish emigrants, of whom Philip Embury was one, organized a society in New York; and, in 1768, they erected in that city the first Methodist church in America.* About the same time Robert Strawbridge, who was also a native of Ireland, organized a society in Maryland, and built a log meeting-house near Pipe creek, in that province. Other emigrants from the British Isles who had settled in Philadelphia, laid the foundations of a society in that city, which soon rivaled, in point of numbers and active zeal, the one in New York. Encouraged by the progress of the sect in Amer- ica, Mr. Wesley sent over two additional laborers, in 1769, viz: Rich- ard Boardman and Joseph Pilmore, the former being stationed at New York, and the latter at Philadelphia.f In 1771, Francis Asbury * This building was then called “Wesley chapel.” It subsequently became known as the “ John Street church.” t After his arrival at Philadelphia, Asburv wrote to Wesley that he had found 300 mem- bers of the society in New York, 250 in Philadelphia and a few in New Jersey, in all about 600, without including those in Maryland, of whose numbers at that time he was ignorant.324 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. and Richard Wright were added to the work ; and in 1773, Thomas Rankin aild George Shadford. Rankin was appointed by Mr. Wesley “General Assistant of the Societies in America,” and soon after his arrival he issued a call for “a conference of all the preachers in America,” with a view to systematize the work. The meeting was held at Philadelphia, July 4, 1773, and was the first “conference” that ever assembled in this country. The society then embraced 1160 members, of whom 500 were in Maryland. During the war of the Revolution, the society gradually decreased in New York and Philadelphia, but continued to spread rapidly in the southern states, so that while its total membership at the close of the war was 13,740, only about 1100 were resident north of Philadelphia. After the peace, Wesley suggested to his followers in the United States that they should make an organization independent of the society in England. This was accordingly done in 1785, and the title of the “ Methodist Episcopal Church ” was adopted to designate the new denomination.* Thomas Coke and Philip Asbury were ap- pointed bishops, or superintendents, and the society was divided into districts over which “ elders” were stationed under whose charge two or more preachers were placed. The preachers were then styled “ as- sistants,” and the fields in which they labored were called “circuits.” The itinerant principle, which is still one of the distinctive features of the Methodist church, was adopted, and the preachers held their “ cir- cuits ” only for a year. In this way the work was zealously prose- cuted, often amid extreme hardships, and the society regained the ground which it had for a time lost, and won new triumphs in the north as well as the south. In 1786, New York and New Jersey were divided into two “ elder dis- tricts,” one of which embraced the East Jersey, Newark, NewYork city, and Long Island “ circuits,” and formed the extreme northern limit of the society in the United States at that time. The East Jersey “cir- cuit” bordered on Orange county, and had stationed on it as “assis- tants,” John McClaskey and Ezekiel Cooper, f While Mr. Cooper was on this circuit (1786), one of his public services was attended by Col. David McCamley, who invited him to preach at his residence in the town of Warwick. Mrs. Arthur Smith, a sister of Col. Mcr * Therefore, at this Conference, we formed ourselves into an independent church; and following the counsel of Mr. John Wesley, who recommended the Episcopal mode of church government, we thought it best to become an Episcopal church, making the Epis- copal office elective, and the elected superintendent, or bishop, amenable to the body of ministers and preachers.—Min. Am. Con. J, p. 22. t Ezekiel Cooper was born Feb., 22,1763, in Caroline county, Maryland. His name first appears in the Conference minutes in 1785, though he was previously employed by Bishop Asbury. He was the first “ editor and general book steward ” of the society, having re- ceived that appointment in 1800. Sixty-four years of his life was spent in the ministry, and he was long regarded as one of the brightest lights of the American pulpit. He died on the 21st of February, 1847, at the age of 84 years.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 325 Camley, was visiting her brother at the time of the service there, and at her solicitation Mr. Cooper accompanied her to her residence in Middlehope, where he held the first Methodist service in the town of Newburgh. The date at which it was held cannot now be ascer- tained, but it was probably in October, 1786. Mr. Cooper, accompa- nied by Samuel Purdy, also visited at this time John Woolsey, near Milton, and having established here an outpost for missionary labor far beyond the bounds of his circuit, he returned to New Jersey. Six weeks later, John McClaskey and John Cooper passed over the same route, and extended the new circuit to the Paltz, where they held ser- vice at the residences of Hendrick Deyo and Andries DuBois. They also stopped in the village of Newburgh, and preached in the house of Elnathan Foster, where a “class” was soon after formed. In Janu- ary, Ezekiel Cooper again visited the district, and held service in the house of Sami. Fowler in Middlehope, which was henceforth a regu- lar preaching station until 1813. From 1813 to 1822, the meetings were held in the summer in a barn owned by Daniel Holmes, and in the winter in Mr. Fowler’s house. The success which had attended the efforts of Mr. Cooper and his associates, led to the organization, in 1788, of the Flanders (N. J.) cir- cuit, which embraced this section of country. The preachers on this circuit were Jesse Lee, Aaron Hutchinson, and John Lee, and it had 543 members. In 1789, it was again divided and the Newburgh cir- cuit established, its preachers being Nathl. B. Mills and Andrew Har- pending. It embraced 261 of the membership of Flanders circuit,* and was divided into the following “classes” or informal societies, viz: ‘ Sami. Fowler’s Class, Elnathan Foster’s Class, Munson Ward’s Class, Geo. Stanton’s Class, Daniel Holmes’ Class, Jacob Dayton’s Class, Latintown Class, ' Samuel Wyatt’s Class, Schultz’s Class, Widow Allison’s Class, at Middlehope. at Newburgh, at Fostertown, at Gardnertown. at Middlehope. near Latintown. at Latintown. at Keytown. at Dolsentown. at Pochuck. Warwick Class, at Warwick. John Ellison’s Class,f at New Windsor. Luff Smith’s Class, near Marlborough. David Ostrander’s Class, at PlatteMll. David Stephens’ Class, in the Clove. Richard Garrison’s Class, in the Clove. Sami. Ketcham’s Class, near Sugar Loaf. Arter’s Class, Barton’s Class, John McWhorter’s Class, Long Pond Class. These classes continued to be visited by the circuit preachers until they ripened into societies of sufficient strength to support located ministers, or until that end was attained by the union of two or more classes in a short circuit, in the following order: • * The Flanders circuit was left with a membership of two hundred and eighty-two per- sons, which fully corroborates the statement that the Newburgh circuit was previously embraced in its bounds. + This Class held its services in the upper part of a house which Mr. Ellison erected ex- pressly for the purpose in 1790 or ’91. The building is still standing, and is situated about three hundred feet west of the residence of the late Chas. F. Morton. In 1807, the Class was organized into a regular society under the title of the “ Methodist Episcopal Church of New Windsor.” A suitable edifice was erected during the same year. This was the first Methodist church in the present county of Orange, and is still occupied by the New Wind- sor society. Several changes, however, have been made in its appearance.326 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. FIRST OR TRINITY M. E. CHURCH. In 1808, the “Newburgh/5 or “Elnathan Foster’s class,” as it was originally called, was organized into a church under the title of the “Methodist Episcopal Church in the Parish of Newburgh.” Its trus- tees were Morgan Cole, Lewis Carter, Wm. Baker, Joseph Cole, and Geo. "Westlake.* It continued to be supplied by circuit preachers until 1820, when Samuel Fowler,f its first located pastor, was ap- pointed to the charge. Since that time the following ministers have held the station, viz: Hate. 1820 1821-22 1823 1821-25 1826-27 1828-29 1830-81 1832-33 1831 1835-36 1837-38 1839-10 1811-12 1813 18H-15 Name. Samuel Fowler. Tobias Spicer. William Jewett. John D. Moriarty. Thomas Mason. Robert Seney. Stephen L. Stillman. James Coveil. William Thatcher. Seymour Landon. John Kennedy. Robert Seney. Edmund E. Griswold. Friend W. Smith. Davis Stocking. Hate. 1816-17 1848-49 1850- 51 1852-53 1851- 55 1856-57 1858-59 1860-61 Nov.'61 to Ap, 1862- 1 year 1863- 66 1866-69 . 1869-72 1872-75 1875 Name. Zephaniah N. Lewis. John L. Gilder. Abiathar M. Osbon. Charles B. Sing. Luther W. Peck. Edwin R. Keyes. John W. Beach. Charles Shelling. ’62 John Parker. M. D. C. Crawford. Geo. S. Hare. John Miley. Wm. P. Abbott. Andrew Longacre. Geo. S. Hare. The class from which the society sprung held its first meeting (1786) at the house of Elnathan Foster, which occupied the site on which the first Presbyterian church edifice now stands. The old Lu- theran church and the old clothing store-house were also used when the circuit preachers visited the station, and after the erection of the Academy the services were held in the upper room of that building. J Subsequently the old McIntosh house was occupied. Immediately after the organization of the society, it was resolved (June 8, 1808,) to erect “a house of worship, 45 by 35 feet,” and George Westlake and Morgan Cole were appointed to “ circulate subscription papers, as well as to have the general direction in erecting the building.” The sum of $773 was subscribed for the purpose, and a lot on the corner of Gidney avenue and Liberty street was purchased from Elnathan Foster for a nominal consideration. The trustees note their first * The records of this church, under date of March 14, 1808, are as follows: “By a resolve this day of the members of the society of the Methodist Episcopal church in Newburgh, in order to take into consideration the election of five trustees, agreeable to an act of the Legislature of this state, to take charge of the temporal con- cerns of a house for religious and divine worship, to be known by the name of the Meth- odist Episcopal church— “Resolved, therefore, That one of the official members do publish, on Thursday even- ing next, being the 17th day of March, instant, and the stated night for public worship, that a meeting will be held at the house of Morgan Cole on Friday, the 1st day of April next, at 3 o’clock in the afternoon, to elect five trustees for the above purpose.” t fjamuel Fowler was the son of Samuel Fowler at whose residence the first “ class ” was formed. He was admitted to the ministry in 1791, and continued in active service un- til his death, which occurred on the 2d of February, 1831, at the age of 74 years. % There is a tradition that Elnathan Foster, in subscribing to the finishing of the upper rooms of the Academy for the use of the courts, made a condition that the Methodists should be permitted to occupy them, which was accepted.TRINITY M. E. CHURCH-1861. p327CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, J^TO. 327 meeting in this building, which was called the “ Brick Chapel,” under date of February 18th, 1811, but it was undoubtedly occupied at an earlier period. Even then, however, the interior of the edifice was not finished, nor was it completed until 1816 or ’17. In 1833 (Dec. 23), the trustees of the church resolved to build “a new meeting house, to be 50 by 62 feet, after the plan of the Wash- ington street M. E. Church, Brooklyn, capable of accommodating 100Q persons.” A suitable site was purchased on Second street, and on the 29th July, 1834, the cor- ner-stone of the edifice was laid with appropriate ceremonies. * The building was completed in 1835, and was dedicated April 1st of that year. Its cost was about $10,000. A parsonage on Montgomery street was subse- quently added to the property. In the spring of 1860, the society first M. E. chukch-isgo. determined to build a new edifice, and for that purpose the trustees purchased a site on the corner of Liberty and Third streets. Plans by R. Lockwood, architect, were adopted and the contracts awarded to Little & Kelly, carpenters; John Little, mason, and Madden & Fitzgerald, stone-work. The corner-stone was laid Nov. 14th, 1860, by Bishop Janes.')' One year from that date (Wednesday, Nov. 13, 1861), the building was dedicated, in the usual form, by Bishop Simp- son, of Indiana. It is in the decorated style of the thirteenth cen- tury Gothic, and has a front on Liberty street of 73 feet 6 inches by 140 feet on Third street. The chief features of the exterior consist of three towers with their entrances, the transept and the lecture- room front. The center tower and spire rises to the height of 180 feet; the side towers to 63 feet. The interior dimensions are: Nave, 85 feet long by 62 feet wide; transept 78 feet long, terminating at the ends with .large enriched windows. The ceiling of nave and transept is 40 feet, and is richly groined and ribbed. The auditorium contains 150 pews; the lecture-room, on the second floor in the rear, will ac- commodate about four hundred persons, and the class-rooms on the first floor are large and convenient. The cost of the building and lot was about $35,000. An organ was added in February, 1870, at a cost of $5,000. It only remains to add that the title of the church * The building was erected by Sylvanus Loud, builder, and Henry Yeltman, mason. The trustees of the church at that time were Levi P. Dodge, Robert Phillips, Sylvanus Loud, Allen Lockwood, and Alanson Randol. The original entrance was by a flight of steps extending nearly the full width of the front. t The stone used was taken from the old church on Second street; the original papers, etc., which it contained were redeposited with those of the later period.328 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH was changed from “First” to “Trinity” in 1871. The property of the church on Second street was sold to private parties, and subse- quently converted into an opera house. MIDDLEHOPE M. E. CHURCH. The original “Samuel Fowler’s class” and the “Daniel Holmes’ class,” were organized into a church, Dec. 14, 1821, and Wm. Smith, Daniel Holmes, David Wyatt, Gilbert Holmes, and Daniel Merritt, were elected trustees. Arrangements were soon after made for erecting a church edifice, which was dedicated Dec. 29, 1822, under the name of “ Asbury Chapel.” * It has always been sup- asbury chapel—i860. plied by circuit preachers, and is now associated with the M. E. church at Fostertown, the two churches forming the “North Newburgh circuit.” Its building has undergone some slight architectural changes since 1860. GARDNERTOWN M. E. CHURCH. In 1825, the “George Stanton’s class” was organized into a church and (Dec. 15) Burroughs Westlake, Joshua Marston, David W. Gid- ney, Silas B. Gardner and Robt. Lockwood were chosen “ Trus- tees of the Methodist Episcopal Church at Gardnertown.”— A house of worship was erected the next year and was dedicated on the 20th November. It remained in occu- pation Until NOV. 24, gardnertown m. e. church—1859. 1858. The present edifice was from plans by E. K. ShavT. It was erected in 1858, under contract with Thomas Shaw & Sons, at a cost of $2,750, and was dedicated Nov. 24th. It is a simple Gothic chapel accommodating about four hundred persons. The society was for some years associated in a circuit with that at Little Britain. ROSSVILLE M. E. CHURCH. The M. E. church at Rossville was organized Oct. 8, 1830, when * “ Dedication.—The Methodist Meeting-house, to he known by the name of the As- bury Chapel, lately erected about three miles north of this village, was dedicated to the worship of Almighty God, on Sabbath, 29th inst. During the day three very appropriate discourses were delivered. Rev. E. Smith, Rev. A. Scolefield, and Rev. S. Arnold officiated on the occasion.—Political Index, Dec. 31,1822.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, J5TG 329 -Thomas Aderton, Alvah Waring, Wm. Penny, John Bushfield, Nehe- miah Fowler, Thomas Bushfield, and Gilbert Lockwood, were elected trustees. The edifice now occupied by the society was erected in 1831. It is 30 by 42 feet, and cost originally about $600. It was considerably improved and refurnished and painted in 1876. The society cannot be satisfactorily traced to any of the original classes. It is now associated with the M. E. church at Pleasant Valley, Ulster county, rossville m. e. church—1859. in the support of a minister. The parsonage is at the latter place. FOSTERTOWN M. E. CHURCH. On the 31st Dec., 1833, the “Munson Ward’s class” was organized as the M. E. church at Fostertown; and David Wyatt, Jethro Allison, John F. Wil- liams, Jacob Gillis, and Wm. S. Holmes, were elected trustees. In 1834, the build- ing now occupied by the society was erected and was dedicated in September of that year. Like its contemporaries of the pri- fostertown m. e. church—1859. mitive Methodistic era, it has been improv- ed since its original dedication, but has no architectural claims. SECOND OR ST. JOHN’S M. E. CHURCH. The organization of this church was effected through the instru- mentality of Joseph Longking, Henry Cornell, and James Martin, who proposed to the trustees of the 1st M. E. church (1851) that that body should hire for the use of such a society the building for- merly occupied by the second Presbyterian church—the applicants agreeing to pay the interest on the debt then existing on that build- ing for one year. The trustees, however, declined to take any steps in the matter. After further consideration, and with the approval of the presiding elder of the district and of Kev. A. M. Osbon, the preacher stationed in Newburgh, Mr. Longking and his associates de- termined to prosecute the enterprise; and in compliance with their request the presiding elder appointed Rev. Aaron F. Palmer, a local deacon, preacher in charge until the ensuing session of the New York Conference. The society was formally organized on Sunday, May 23d, 1852, at the residence of Mr. Cornell, at which time certificates of membership were received from seven persons. Previous to this time, however, arrangements had been made for the use of the second Presbyterian church edifice, and, on the 9th of June following, Henry Cornell, James Martin, John H. Waters, Nelson Austin, and Joseph Longking, were unanimously elected trustees,330 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH and the articles of corporation were formed. At the annual session of the New York Conference for 1852, Rev. Kufus C. Putney was appointed to the charge! The church edifice was dedicated on the 13th of June, and on the 25th of that month the society had a mem- bership of 129 persons, nearly all of whom had been previously con- nected with the First church. The building which had been rented for the society at the time of its organization, was purchased by its trustees in March, 1853, for $5,000, which was principally paid by subscriptions; and at about the same time arrangements were made for erecting a parsonage and also a building for lectures and class meetings. These buildings were completed Sept. 12th, 1853—the former at a cost of $2,349, and the latter at $2,109. The building was badly injured by fire in the fall of 1873, and in the summer following was repaired and materially im- proved at a cost of about $7,000. It was reopened for service in Oc- tober, 1874, Bishop Peck conducting the exercises. In the spring of 1876, the present front of thirty-six feet with towers, was added (from plans by E. K. Shaw, architect,) at a cost of $10,000. The edifice is now one of the most thoroughly modern in the city. The principal floor has seats for 650 persons and the Sunday-school gallery over the vestibule for 300. A recess in the rear of the pulpit accommodates the choir and organ, and was part of the improvements of 1874. The society adopted the title of “St. John’s” at its reopening in 1874. The following have been its pastors: Bate. Name. 1864-66 Thos. B. Smith. 1867-68 DeLossLull. 1869-70 H. H. Birkins. 1871-72 W. E. Clarke. 1878-74 George H. Corey. 1875-76 L. H. King. Bate. Name. 1852-58 Rufus C. Putney. 1854-55 L. W. Walsworth. 1556-57 David Buck. 1858-59 E. L. Prentice. 1860-61 John P. Hermance. 1862-63 Chas. S. Brown. 1864 (3 mos.) G. H. Gregory. THIRD OR GRACE M. E. CHURCH. This church is at West Newburgh, on Western Avenue. It was the outgrowth of the Second or St. John’s church, and especially of a mission Sunday-school established under its auspices in 1848. The society or school was legally organized in June, 1865, when P. S. Haines, James Harrison, C. H. Bond, Jos. W. Bond, F. Klaproth, David Gibb, Chas. Estabrook, John Haskins, and Chas. L. Brown were elected trustees. The regular church organization, however, dates from April 25th, 1868, when thirty members from the Second church united for that purpose. The building of a church edifice was commenced in May, 1866, and the basement completed and occu- pied by the Sunday-school and by a free school, the latter under the charge of the Board of Education. The corner-stone was laid in the autumn of 1867, Kev. J. B. Wakely delivering the address, and theCHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 331 edifice was completed under plans by J. D. Kelly, architect. It was dedicated Sept. 2d, 1868, on which occasion the sermon was by Rev. Dr. Fletcher from Mark ix., 18, 19. Dr. McAllister preached in the evening. Rev. Dr. A. M. Osbon, presiding elder, had principal charge of the exercises at both services. The structure is of brick and in- cludes basement, auditorium and choir gallery; it is in neat but plain finish, and has seats for about 400 persons. It is 35 by 61 feet; lot 66 by 105 feet—the latter presented by Messrs. W. R. & C. L. Brown; its cost was about $10,000. A parsonage was added to the property in 1874, at a cost of $3,500. Rev. Yan Ness Traver (1868) was the first minister in charge. He was succeeded by Rev. D. W. C. Yan Gaasbeck, and the latter by Rev. Dr. Osbon. st. Paul’s german m, e. church. A meeting for the purpose of introducing the organization of a German Reformed church, was held in the lecture-room of the Asso- ciate Reformed church on Sunday, January 5th, 1868. The exercises were conducted by Rev. A. Rahn, and resulted in the constitution of a society (Feb. 7) under the title of “St. Paul’s German Reformed Church.” Mr. Rahn was elected pastor, and was installed on Sunday, March 29th, by Rev. Dr. Schaff. At a subsequent meeting the society resolved to unite with the Presbytery of North River, and it was duly received by that body under the title of “St. Paul’s German Presby- terian Church.” Soon after organization the society purchased a site on Johnston street near Western Avenue, for the erection of a church edifice, the corner-stone of which was laid September 10th, by the Masonic fraternity in Grand Lodge of Ceremony. The building was completed and dedicated in the summer of 1869. Its cost, including lot, was about $12,000, and its capacity sufficient for the accommoda- tion of about four hundred persons. Mr. Rahn resigned the charge and was succeeded, in July, 1870, by Rev. E. Lubkert, who served as supply until September following, when he was installed pastor and continued in that relation until the 28th of July, 1872. His resigna- tion was mainly in consequence of a union which was effected, in April of that year, with the Conference of the M. E. church, under which it was agreed by the trustees of Trinity church that that body would assume the mortgage debt of St. Paul’s, amounting to about $4,500. The title of the society was then changed to “ St. Paul’s Ger- man M. E. Church,” and its pulpit supplied by the appointment of Rev. G. Meyers. A subsequent board of trustees of Trinity church refused to carry out the agreement which had been made, on the ground that the action which had been had was illegal, it not having been in compliance with a vote of the congregation. This conclusion compelled St. Paul’s to submit to a sale of its property, under mort-332 HIS TOR Y OF NEWB TJRQH. gage foreclosure, in 1876. The society maintains its organization, but its permanency is problematical. st. Patrick’s catholic church. Tradition and written testimony give the date of the first service held by Catholic priests in Newburgh as 1817, when the Rev. Dr. Ffrench said mass at the house of Mr. Gilmore on Western Avenue. The attendants upon his ministrations, which were only occasional, were as follows, viz: Mark McIntyre, John Fitzpatrick, Henry Gil- more, Daniel Devlin, Dennis McCool, Enos McAllister, Michael Bird, George McCahill, Charles Mackin, Owen McGahey, Patrick McGahey, and Thomas and Hugh Riley, and their families. Missionary labors were continued here until 1826, when the present church was formed. The number of Catholics did not then exceed thirty, and mass was said every six months. Soon after this time the Rev. Philip O’Reilly was stationed on the Newburgh district and said mass here once every month. In 1836, the Rev. Patrick Duffy was appointed to the station, and for seventeen years remained Catholic pastor of Newburgh. He died in 1853. After an interval of one year, during which time the church was ministered to by the Rev. Mr. Gallagher, the Rev. E. J. O’Reilly was appointed pastor, and served until June 1st, 1867, when he was succeeded by Rev. E. S. Briady. The service of mass was first said in Mr. Gilmore’s house, as already stated. Afterwards, and for a number of years, the McIntosh house was used by the congregation. In 1838, the preliminary steps were taken for the erection of a church edifice, and the site now occupied was purchased by subscriptions from resident Catholics, aided by out- side collections and contributions from members of other denomina- tions. The building was completed and opened for service in Decem- ber, 1842. Its value was then estimated at about $12,000. It was a stone structure, about 100 by 60 feet, with no architectural features. It was neatly fitted up with pews and a small gallery, had an organ, and two fine oil paintings about 14 by 9 feet, representing the birth and the entombment of the Saviour, painted by Rembrandt Lockwood. In 1852, a field was purchased, at the comer of First and Stone streets, and a Cemetery opened. In 1854, a lot was purchased ad- joining the church and a pastoral residence erected thereon—the house and lot costing about $10,000. The year 1858 was signalized by the erection of a commodious school-house, situated immediately west of the church, which was completed and opened on the 29th of No- vember of that year. The school was instituted in 1850. In 1855, a Library Association was organized, and some 600 volumes collected. For four years, ending with August, 1860, this association published a very spirited monthly magazine, edited by the late John Ashhurst.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 333 A Sabbath-school and other organizations peculiar to the Catholic faith, are also connected with the church. In 1860, the church made extensive alterations and additions to its house of worship, rendering it one of the finest ecclesiastical struc- tures on the Hudson. Its plan is in the style known as the decorated Gothic of the 13th century. The building is cruciform, the front or- namented with pinnacles and, parapets of rich crochet and quatrefoil work. A tower, surmounted by a spire of open tracery work, adorns the front. The windows are of heavy carved work and filled with richly stained glass. The ceiling is arched and ribbed, and the finish throughout of the highest order. The plans were furnished by Bem- brandt Lockwood, and the work executed under his direction by J. Gill, mason, and Little & Kelly, carpenters. The following are the dimensions of the building, viz: length, 150 feet; length of transept, 75 feet; front, 55 feet 3 inches; height of ceiling, 29 feet; spire 135 feet. During Father Briady’s administration the church edifice and the school-house have been thoroughly repaired and refurnished, and the parsonage rebuilt—the latter in 1869, at a cost of $13,000. In 1871, the property on Grand street, near Washington, was purchased and improved at a cost of about $15,000, and opened (1872) as St. Pat- rick’s Orphan Asylum, under the management of Sisters of Charity. It is now occupied in part for that purpose and in part by a select school for young ladies. In the spring of 1875, a plot of fifteen acres, near Muchattoes hill, was purchased for cemetery purposes, at a cost of $7,200. st. mary’s catholic church. In March, 1875, on the application of a number of members of St. Patrick’s, Archbishop McCloskey granted an order dividing the origi- nal parish and constituting, from the northern part of its territory, St. Mary’s parish. Bev. M. J. Phelan, formerly of Port Ewen, was appointed pastor, and said his first mass in the parish on Easter- Sunday, 1875, in the opera house. Property was soon after purchas- ed on Gidney Avenue and South street, for $20,000, and mass cele- brated in the mansion on the premises. In May following, a tempo- rary frame building for church purposes was erected, costing $3,500. Embraced in St. Mary’s parish is the Academy of Our Lady of Mercy (a branch convent of the Sisters of Mercy of New York), which was opened at Balmville in the summer of 1875. FIRST UNIVERSALIST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH. The facts relative to the early efforts for the introduction of Univer- salism in Newburgh, are almost wholly traditional. It is said that thirty or forty years ago, the Bev. Mr. Mitchell, of New York city, preached here a few times. He occupied the ball-room of the old Man-334 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. sion House, and it is remembered that he always had a medallion hung on the wall behind his pulpit, on which was inscribed, in letters of gold, “God is Love.” His meetings were well attended, but no soci- ety was formed, and the effect of his labors was only transient. Sub- sequently the Bev. Mr. Parker, of Troy, as well as the Bey. Mr. Lyon, of New York, are said to have preached to small audiences here. In 1858, a few friends of Universalism resolved to make an attempt to establish the ministry of that faith in Newburgh, and for that pur- pose they invited the Bev. T. Borden, then of Hudson, to hold service here. He accepted the invitation, and preached his first discourse in Newburgh on the 21st November, at the Court-house. The services were well attended; and on the 22d, a meeting of those friendly to the movement was held and a committee appointed to secure a regular supply of ministerial labor. The informal organization continued to gain strength, and, on the 21st of February, 1859, the society was regularly organized, in accordance with the statute, under the title of thfe “First Universalist Congregational Church of the Village of New- burgh.” In October, the Bev. W. B. Cook was chosen pastor. The society failed financially in 1862. In 1863, the church edifice was purchased by the German, Catholics, who conducted service and held a school in it, but failed in effecting a permanent organization. In the fall of 1864, the Board of Education purchased it, with a view to convert it to school purposes; but, after temporary occupation, sold it (1865) to private parties, by whom it was removed. The services of the socie- ty were held in the Court- house until July, 1860. In July, 1859, a lot was pur- chased on Liberty street, north of Farrington, and the erection of a church edifice was commenced. It was completed in 1860, and dedicated on Wednesday, Aug. 1st, of that year. It was in the Italian style of architecture, and was con- structed from plans drawn by John D. Kelly, of New- burgh. It was neatly fin- ished and furnished accom- modations for about three hundred persons.CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, ETC. 335 CHURCH OF OUR FATHER. The Church of Our Father may be denominated the successor of the Universalist society, formed Feb. 21st„ 1859. On the last Sunday of July, 1867, Rev. Wm. R. G-. Mellen commenced Unitarian worship at the Court-house with an audience of twenty-five in the morning and thirty in the afternoon. Subsequent services were held by Mr. Mellen and other preachers, until Feb. 15th, 1868, when the Rev. C. B. Webster was elected pastor. On the 7th of July following a Unita- rian society was organized. A building lot was soon after purchased, at the corner of South and Johnston streets, at a cost of $3,000, and in the summer of 1869, a church edifice was erected at a cost of $12,300. This building is in the early Gothic style—of brick with blue-stone borders and granite caps; the roof is supported by iron pillars resting on brick piers. It is 40 feet by 60, and provides seats for four hundred persons. A small pastor’s room and a choir gallery are furnished in the rear. The dedication took place July 17th, 1870. Mr. Webster resigned the pastorate in 1871, and Rev. F. W. Holland became his successor in June of that year. The principal patrons and founders of the society were the late Josiah S. Young, and the late John P. DeWint, the latter a resident of Fishkill. —In addition to the societies already enumerated, the First Pres- byterian church maintains the Bethel Mission on North-Water street, and the American Reformed church the Gleason Mission on Western Avenue. There are also two societies of colored people—the Shiloh Baptist church and the African Methodist Episcopal Zion church. The latter has a neat edifice on Washington street. COMPARATIVE STATISTICS; Value of Seating Average Commu- Salaries Church. Year. No. Property* Capacity Attend.. nicants. Ministers Baptist, .... 1855. ...1. ...$7,000 ... 450... ... 250.. .... 167 ... $700 1875. ...2. ...35,000... .. 1300... ... 600.. .... 402.. ... 3,300 Methodist Episcopal, ... 1855. ...6. .. .22,400... ...3200... ...1900.. .... 833.. ... 3,750 1875. ...8. .. 115,000.... ...4000... .. .3000.. ....1531$. ... 7,600 Presbyterian, ... 1855.. ..1. ... 8,000.... .. 600... .. 400.. .... 247.. ... 1,000 1875. ...4. . .no;ooo.... ...3500.:. ...2000.. ....1215.. ... 9,000 Assoc. Refd. Presb... .... 1855., ...2. ...15,000... ... 900... ... 600.. 431.. .'. 2,000 1875. ...1. ...10,000... ... 600... ...-300,. .... 150.. ... 1,500 Reformed Presbyterian,.. 1855.. ...2. .. .14,000.... ...1200... ... 480.. .... 250.. ... 1,100 1875. ...2. ...20,000.... ...1200... ... 600.. .... 416.. ... 3,300 United Presbyterian,. ... 1875.. ..1. ...8,000.... .. 475... ... 300.. ..,.218.. ... 1,500 Protestant Episcopal, ... 1855. ..1. ...15,000... ... 750... ... 600.. .... 180.. ... 1,200 1875. ...2. .. .60,000.... ..1500... .. 800.., .... 547.: ... 7,000 Refd. Prot. Episcopal ,... 1875.. ..1. ... 7,000.... ... 300... ... 100... ... 31§.. .. 1,500 American Reformed,. ... 1855.. ...1. .. .15,000.... .. 600... ... 250... ,... 180 . ... 800 1875. ...1. ...60,000.... ...1000 .. ... 600.. .... 509.. .., 3,000 Roman Catholic, .... 1855.. ..1. ...15,000.... .. 800... ... 700.. .... 600.. ... 1,000 1875. ...2. .. .70,000... ..1500... ...2500.. ....4000.. ... 2,800$ Unitarian, .... 1875!, ...1. .. .12,000.... ;. 400... ... 200.. .... 100§. ... 1,200 RECAPITULATION. Property. Capacity. Attend. Commun. Salaries. 1855... $111,400... . 8,900...... ... 5,180. 2,888 .. $11,500 1875.. 507,000.. .15,775 .. .11,000 : ....... 9,113. .. 41,700 * Estimated. f. 891 Probationers in addition. t Additional from fees. § New.336 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. The Theological Seminary of the Associate Reformed church was the first institution of the. kind in the United States. There were indeed Professors of Divinity (most of whom were connected with colleges) who were accustomed to give lectures on the science of Theology to such students as pleased to attend; but there was no institution expressly designed for the training of candidates for the ministry, and formally organized on an academic basis, in existence in this country previous to the erection of this Seminary. The first steps towards its establishment were taken by the Asso- ciate Reformed Synod, in 1796, on the suggestion of one of its young- est members, Mr. afterwards Dr. John M. Mason, of New York, then in the early dawn of his brilliant career. At the meeting of Synod, in 1796, an act was adopted “concerning a Synodical Fund,” the main object of which fund was to aid poor and pious youth in their studies for the ministry, and to maintain a Professorship of Theology. The church was small, the country was very poor in those days, and the growth of the fund was necessarily slow; but the ideas thrown out by Dr. Mason had taken root in the minds of his brethren, and at the meeting of Synod in 1801, it was resolved, after much discus- sion, to erect a Theological Seminary on a peculiar plan, and of a higher order than any “ school of the prophets ” then in being. Dr. Mason was sent to Great Britain to ask help from the churches of the father land, and he obtained the handsome sum of $5,500, which was chiefly expended in the purchase of a noble library. Dr. Mason re- turned in 1802, and was unanimously chosen to preside over the in- fant institution, which was at first located in New York, where it was opened in 1805. The number of students rapidly increased, and con- sidering the size of the denomination, it continued to be comparative- ly large, until the suspension of the Seminary in 1821. This result was mainly owing to the failing health of Dr. Mason, which had com- pelled him to retire from a sphere in which he had spent the best years of his life, and to which he was enthusiastically devoted. By a vote of the General Synod of the church in 1822 (which was judicially declared a few years afterwards to have been illegal), the library was transferred to the Seminary at Princeton. The operations of the Seminary were suspended until the summer of 1829, when the A. R. Synod of New York determined to resusci- tate the institution and to locate it at Newburgh. The Rev. Joseph McCarrell, D. D., of Newburgh, was elected Professor of Theology, and the Rev. Drs. John McJimpsey, Alex. Proudfit, Robert Forrest, and D C. McLaren, were chosen Superintendents. During the fol- lowing year, the necessary steps were taken (after sundry fruitlessCHURCHES, SCHOOLS. £T(7. 337 appeals to the General Assembly of the Presbyterian church) for the recovery of the library and funds removed to Princeton in 1822, and after a protracted lawsuit, they were restored to their old owners. Another important movement was made in 1835, viz: for the erec- tion of a suitable edifice for the accommodation of the students and professors. For so small a body as the Synod of New York, the un- dertaking was an almost herculean one. Money was collected from various sources, an admirable site covering thirteen acres of land was purchased, and a charter of incorporation was granted by the legisla- ture of this state on the 25th May, 1836. The trustees named in the act were Hon. John Willard of Salem, Hon. Wm. M. Oliver of Penn Yan, Hon. Archibald C. Niven and Alpheus Dimmick of Monticello, Hon. Robert Denniston of Salisbury, Hon. John W. Brown, and D. W. Bate, and Daniel Farrington of Newburgh, James Waugh and William Wear of Little Britain, James D. Bull of Hamptonburgh, and Benjamin Parker of Kortright. The foundation of the Seminary was laid in 1837,* and the building was completed in 1839, at a cost (including land) of about $25,000. In 1858, an organic union was effected between the Associate Pres- byterian church of North America and the Associate Reformed church, under the title of the United; Presbyterian church. A few congrega- tions of the Associate Reformed Synod of New York refused to enter into this union. These laid claim to the Seminary; but by a suit at law it was decided that the property rightfully belonged to that por- tion of the Synod, the great majority, which had assented to the union. In 1865, the Associate Reformed Synod of New York, the legally re- cognized owners of the property, took measures, in cooperation with the United Presbyterian Synod of New York, for reopening the insti- tution, and elected as professors therein Rev. J. B. Dales, D. D., of Philadelphia, and James Harper of New York. On the 2d October, 1867, accordingly, the building was opened again for the training of young men for the ministry, and now has students from nine or ten states. The number of bound volumes in the library is nearly 3600. The professors have been as follows: Systematic Theology.—Rev. John M. Mason, D. D., 1805—1821. Bev. Alex. Proudfit, D. D., 1820—1821. Bev. Joseph McCarrell, D. D., 1829—1860. Bev. James Harper, D. D., 1867—now Professor. Biblical Literature.—Bev. James M. Matthews, 1809—1816. Bev. James Arbuckle, As- sistant, 1820—21. Bev. John Forsyth; Jr., 1837—1815. Bev. David L. Proudfit, 1840—12. Bev. Robert Stewart, D. D., 1872—now Professor. Church History, Mowbray Carpenter; 5. Alathea, who married John Brower. He married second, Eachel Sherwood, and had: 6. David; 7. Joseph; 8. Phebe, who married Andrew Cropsey. (7) Humphrey,§ born May 17, 1737; purchased (1758) part of the farm on which his grandson, the late Daniel Merritt, resided at Mid- dlehope. His children were: 1. Glorianna; 2. Mary; 3. Underhill; 4. Caleb; 5. Charlotte; 6. Moses. Underhill (3) was born Feb. 7,1769, * Bolton (Hist. West. Co. ii. 32, 95), gives the names of John Merritt, Senr. (1680), and contemporaneously with him, that of Thomas Merritt—subsequently stating that the latter was the son of the former. The original homestead of the family was in the possession, of one of the descendants of John, Senr., as late as 1848. f “A Colonel of Cavalry in the Queen’s Rangers, 1780. He died at St. Catharines, in Canada, May, 1842, aged 82 years/’ He was a grandson of the first John. $ It is possible that the names here given are not arranged in the order of birth. § The names “Humphrey ” and “Underhill,” are from Humphrey Underhill, one of the original proprietors of the town of Rye, with whom the Merritts were connected.364 HISTOR Y OF NEWBURGE. and died Nov. 19, 1804.* His children were: 1. Martha, b. July 8, 1794, married Gilbert Holmes, settled in Newburgh, died Sept. 14, 1848; 2. Josiah, b. Aug. 21, 1796, was the father of Caleb Merritt; 3. Daniel, b. March 10, 1799, d. May 7, 1867,. had four children: Hiram, Mary J., Daniel H., and Theodore; 4. Elizabeth, b. March 12, 1799 (twin sister to Daniel), married John Goodsell, died Dec. 28, 1824, leaving Charles W. Goodsell (now deceased,) and Elizabeth M* Good- sell (married Jonathan N. Weed,) children her surviving;f 5. Char- lotte, b. Sept. 19, 1801, married Joseph Furman, settled in Plattekilly died August 24, 1824; 6. Maria, b. April 24, 1804, married Robert PhillipsJ and had three children, viz: Jeanette Y., married Richard A. Olmstead; Mary A., married William A. Owen; and Willard M. THE FLEWWELLING FAMILY. The Flewwellings were of Welsh origin, and were among the early settlers of Long Island, from whence John Flewwelling removed to Newburgh sometime about 1760. He married Elizabeth Smith and had: 1. John, married Deborah Denton and had ten children, all of whom died young; 2. Morris, married Jane Merritt and had one daughter, Elizabeth, who married William Palmer; 3. Abel, married Abigail Purdy and had Charlotte who married Samuel Purdy, Eliza- beth who married William Harding, Samuel who married Julia Caul- field, Clarissa who married John Fowler, John who married Eunice Palmer, Abigail who married Thomas Fowler, Amelia who married Richard Taylor, Guilford who married Leah Harding; Jane who mar- ried George Harding; 4. Sarah, married Nehemiah Denton; 5. Mary, married Cornelius Polhamus; and 6. Hannah, married George Wins- low. John (1) was supervisor of the town in 1773, and Morris (2) held the same position in 1776. James, whose name is not given above, is presumed to have been a member of the same family. § * “Mr. Underhill Merritt, the father of Daniel Merritt, Esq., came by accident to a most horrible death, in November, 1804. His neighbor, Mr. Caleb Fowler, had a frolic, drawing wood, and Mr. Merritt was among the number assisting him. After being loaded and on his way to Mr. Fowler’s, he was walking beside his wagon, and in an attempt to get On, as was supposed, his feet caught in the lines, which started his horses and threw him under the wheels of the wagon, which ran over his arm and head. His arm was broken in two places, and his brains crushed so that they laid in the road.’’— Fagw's Orange County, 88. f “ Mrs. Goodsell was a person of an amiable temper, a pattern of piety, and a worthy member of the church of Christ. She died in the full triumph of the Christian faith, which faith she had for years experienced to be the power of God, to the salvation of her soul.” —Political Index, Dec. 28, 1824. X Robert Phillips was born at East Bridgewater, Mass., May 20,1802. He removed to Newburgh in 1816, and learned the trade of tinsmith with his uncle, David Phillips, who commenced business here about 1814. His father, John Phillips (born at East Bridge- water, died in Newburgh, Sept. 23,1833, aged 76 years), joined the Revolutionary army, at Roxbury, Mass., at the age of 19 years. At the organization of Washington’s Life Guard, at Valley Forge in 1779, he was one of the two chosen from his regiment for service in that capacity, and remained there until the close of the war, attaining the rank of Sergeant. The Guard, among other duties, had charge of the quarters, and also of the supplies for Washington’s table; the latter duty mainly devolved upon Sergeant Phillips. David Phil- lips, the uncle of Robert, died in Newburgh in 1832, aged 67; he left three daughters who conducted for several years a select school for young ladies. § Ante p. 137,140.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 365 THE FOWLER FAMILY. The Fowler family of Newburgh is of English ancestry. Monu- mental records at Islington, near London, show the death of John Fowler, at that place, in 1538, and it is added in the work from which this fact is taken, that “divers of this family lie here interred, the an- cestors of Sir Thomas Fowler, Knight and Baronet, living 1630.” * The oldest branches of the family in this country appear to have de- scended from Philip Fowler, who was admitted a freeman of Massa- chusetts colony in 1634, and who settled at Ipswich, and from William Fowler, who came over in 1637, and settled at New Haven, where, being one of the few immigrants who had received a classical educa- tion, he soon became a man of distinction, and is known, historically, as “the first magistrate of New Haven.” The relationship between Philip and William cannot now be ascertained, nor can their descend- ants be positively traced except in a few instances. It is presumed, however, from the predominant given names in the different branches of the family, as well as from the proximity of the localities where they settled, that “ all of this name in Connecticut and New York originated from William Fowler, of New Haven, the magistrate of 1637.” f The genealogy of the Fowlers of Newburgh is traced from Joseph, who is mentioned as a first settler near Mespat Kills, L. I., 1665, and who is supposed to have been the son of William, Jr., of New Haven. J Joseph had William, who had: 1. John; 2. Jeremiah. John (1) was born at Flushing, L. L, in 1686, and was the father of 1. Samuel; 2. Isaac; 3. John; 4. James; 5. Nehemiah. His sons, Samuel and John, having purchased a portion of the Harrison patent, § he removed, with the other members of his family, to Newburgh and continued his re- sidence here until his death, which occurred in 1768. Jeremiah (2) settled at Bye, Westchester county, where he died in 1766. The de- scendants of John (1) were: (1) Samuel was born in the year 1720; married Charlotte Purdy, granddaughter of Joseph and Elizabeth (Ogden) Purdy, and had: 1. Mary, married George Merritt, Jr.; 2. Elizabeth, married Samuel Clark; 3. Charlotte, married Daniel Gidney; 4. Martha, married Beuben Tooker; 5. Abigail, married Abel Flewwelling; 6. Glorianna* married John Fowler (nephew of Samuel) ; 7. Samuel. He died Oct. 13, 1789, aged 69 years and 1 day, and his wife, Charlotte, died July 30, 1791, aged 74 years and 10 months. Samuel Fowler was an influential citizen of the town for some thirty years. His son, Samuel (7), was for forty years a minister of the Methodist Episcopal church, and his resi- * Weever’s Funeral Monuments. f Bolton’s History of Westchester county, ii. 519. See, also, “ Genealogical Memoir of the Descendants of Ambrose Fowler, of Windsor, Conn.” t Biker’s Annals of Newtown, L. I. § Ante p. 132. yBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 369 Daniel B. Boice; 3. Cynthia, m. a Phillips of Low Point; 4. Samuel; 5. William; 6. Daniel. The grandchildren of Benjamin, through his son Charles (5), were: Helen Maria, m. Odell S. Hathaway; Harriet Amelia, d. unmarried; Deborah Ann, m. Hiram Palls;* Mary, m. Chas. U. Cushman; Adeline Ferris, d. unmarried; Lydia Riggs, m. William E. Warren. The resident descendants of Daniel, through Hannah (1) are the children of the late Eli Hasbrouck. THE HASBROUCK FAMILY. The Hasbrouck, or Hasbroinp, family is of French origin^-Abraham and Jean, or John, the first who bore the name in this country, were natives of Calais, France. Long before the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, their father had suffered so much from religious persecu- tion that he removed, with his two sons and a daughter, to Germany. In 1673, John came to America; and in 1675, Abraham followed him, leaving his father with his daughter, who had married one Pierre Hayaar. In a diaiy kept by Abraham Hasbrouck,f the grandson of Abraham the brother of John, it is stated that Abraham, with several of his acquaintances and other followers of Peter Waldus, went from the Palatinate to “Rotterdam, and from thence to Amsterdam, where they embarked for England, April, 1675. From England they sailed to America, and arrived at the town of Boston; from Boston they sailed to Now York and from New York to Esopus, in Ulster county, and arrived there July, 1675.” Abraham found at Esopus his brother “Jean, who had gone to America two years before him, and likewise several acquaintances.” He married, in 1676, “ a young woman named Maria DuyouJ (Deyo) the daughter of Christian Duyou, with whom he had been acquainted in the Palatinate, and who was one of the passen- gers with him to America.” Having determined to settle in the Esopus country, Hasbrouck and his associates selected a tract of land to which they gave the name of the New Paitz and appointed twelve of their number to extinguish the Indian title and to procure a patent. The * Alexander Falls, the ancestor of the Falls family, came from Ireland sometime about 1735, and settled in the present town of New Windsor. He had three sons, Samuel, Ed- ward? and George—of whom Edward had two sons, Alexander and George. Alexander was a merchant in Newburgh at the; opening of the present century, and was the father of William H., George, Edward, Hiram, and Alexander Falls, all of whom were residents of Newburgh and more or less identified with its mercantile and commercial interests for nearly three-quarters of a century. f Ante p, 20. Abraham Hasbrouck was born Aug. 21, 1707, died' Nov. 10, 1791. He married, July 5,1738, Catharine Bruyn, born June 24,1720, died August 10,1793. He re* moved to Kingston in 1735, where he commenced mercantile business. He was a member of the Colonial Assembly from 1739 to 1745,1748 to 1750,1759 to 1778 ; was commissioned Colonel of the Ulster militia in 1757; occupied a leading position in the political history of his time, and took an active part in the movements of the patriots of the Revolution. His strife, Catharine Bruyn, was the daughter of Jacobus Bruyn. She was of Norwegian ex- traction—her grandfather on her father’s side having been a native of Norway, and settled in the Esopus while the province was in the possession of the Dutch. t So spelled in the MSS. diary. Doyoux is probably the original French. It is now written l)eyo, in this country. 024370 BISTORY. OF NEWBURGH. first was accomplished without difficulty, and in 1677, Gov. Andros issued the patent. The twelve associates were chosen to act in behalf of the company not only in obtaining the land, but in managing the civil affairs of the community. At their head stood Abraham Has- brouck. The next step was the organization of a religious congre- gation, which they called the Walloon. Protestant Church, after the “manner and discipline of the church at Geneva, according to the tenets of John Calvin.” This brief sketch of the Hasbrouck family is necessarily confined to the genealogy of the branches that settled in Newburgh. Abra- ham Hasbrouck, the patentee, died March 7, 1717, in an apoplectic fit. His wife, Maria, died March 27, 1741, in her 88th year. His surviving children were: 1. Joseph; 2. Solomon; 3. Daniel; 4. Benja- min; 5. Bachel, who married Louis DuBois, 1701—of whom (1) Joseph married Elsie Schoonmaker in 1706. He died Jan. 28, 1724, aged 40 years and 3 months; and his wife died July 27, 1764, aged 78 years, 8 months, 3 days. “He was,” says the diary hereto- fore quoted, “ a gentleman much respected by those with whom he was acquainted, and he served in several public stations in Ulster county. He was very affable and agreeable in company, eloquent in speech, spoke French-Dutch and very tolerable English. He was of middle stature, of fine physiognomy, black curled hair, fair skin, with a bloozing color, and dark blue eyes.” He left ten children—six sons and four daughters—of whom Jonathan was born April 12th, 1722; died July 31st, 1780. He married, May, 1751, Tryntje (Catharine) daughter of Cornelius DuBois, and left him surviving three sons and two daughters, viz: 1. Cornelius, who espoused the cause of the King, after the declara- tion of independence, and removed to Canada; 2. Isaac; 3. Jonathan, who died unmar- ried; 4. Rachel, who married Daniel Hasbrouck, son of Abraham (1), and 5. Mary* He removed to Newburgh soon after his marriage, having purchased (1747) the property and erected thereon (1750) part of the building now known as Washington’s head-quarters, where he continued to reside (subsequently completing the building in its present shape) during the remainder of his life. He was the first supervisor of the precinct (1763), and held other local offices. “He bore several commissions in his life time-first an Ensign’s then a Captain’s, and afterwards a Colonel’s commission, which latter he received Oct. 25, 1775.” His regiment was often called out, but from his ill-health was commanded much of the time by Lieutenant-colonel Johannes Hardenburgh, Jr., and it was under him at the time of its participation in the defence of Ports Clinton and Montgomery in 1777.* In con- sequence of continued ill-health he resigned his commission in 1778. His death proceeded from an aggravated form of gravel. The MSS. diary of his brother Abraham, heretofore quoted, supplies the following description of his person and character: “He was a loving husband to his wife, a tender and loving father towards his children, a loving brother to his brothers and sisters, an obedient and dutiful child to his parents, a kind master to his servants, a good neighbor, a hospitable man, a good, industrious, sober man, and a very good liver, and a very good commonwealth’s-man (whig). He was a pious worthy man, paid a good deal of reverence in hearing and reading the word of God. He was good na- tured, not soon ruffled or put in a passion, but with a great deal of forbearance. He had very good sense, and strong natural parts and understanding—especially in divinity, and *Ante p. 88, 89,141, etc.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 371 very knowing in common affairs of life. He was a man of stature above six feet and four inches, well shaped and proportioned of body, good features, full visage of face, but of brown complexion, dark blue eyes, black hair with a slight curl, strong of body, arms, legs; was inclined to be corpulent and fat in his younger days, but meeting so many sick- nesses and disorders he was not so fat the last thirty years of his life as he was in his youth. He had a great many good qualities that I don’t write down here. He died on Monday morning and was buried on Tuesday in the burying place on his own land, between his house and the North River, lyirig along side two of his sons who lay buried in the same ground.” The descendants of Colonel Hasbrouck now residing in Newburgh are through his son Isaac (2), who was born Sept. 23,1761; died Aug. 21, 1806. He married (1784) Hannah daughter of Daniel Birdsall, who died Dec. 27, 1807, aged 45 years. His children were: 1. Jonathan, who occupied for many years the head-quarters homestead; 2. Sarah, who married Hon. Walter Case; 3. Israel, died unmarried; 4. Eli, who married first, Harriet, daughter of Joseph Belknap (ante p. 358); 5. Rachel; 6. Mary. The children of Eli (4) were: 1. Israel; 2. Charles H., married Helen, daughter of John Currie ; 3. James B., now of New Windsor; 4. Sarah, married Daniel B. Boice; 5. Eli, Jr., married Susan R. Bill; 6. Mary; 7. Alice, married Samuel W. Miller. (2) Benjamin married Elsie Schoonmaker and left three sons, viz: 1. Benjamin; 2. Cornelius; 3. Joseph. Cornelius (2) married Jane Kelso in 1799. He left two sons: 1. "William C., and 2. Benjamin C., and one daughter, 3. Margaret, who married Captain Eli Perry (for several years in command of the steamer James Madison)-—of whom William C. (1), was born Aug. 23, 1800; married Mary E. daughter of William Roe, June 28, 1831; died Nov. 1870; had three sons, viz: William II., Henry C., and Roe, and three daughters: Maria H., Emily A., and Blandina. He graduated at Union College at the same time William II. Seward was an undergraduate, and soon after removed to Frank- lin, Tenn., where he became principal of the Academy founded by Bishop Otey. Among his pupils and friends there were many then and since distinguished in the history of the nation, among whom were John Bell, Sam. Houston, Felix Grundy, Andrew Jackson, and Matthew F. Maury. Returning to the North, he became principal of the Farmers’ Hall Academy, at Goshen, in 1822; and commenced there the study of law with Mr. Wisner. He completed his legal studies with William Ross, in Newburgh; was admitted to the bar in 1826, and rose rapidly to rank in his profession. He was frequently the candidate of his party for political honors; but, his party being in the minority in the district, he was without success. He was, however, elected to the Assembly of 1847, and was chosen Speaker of that body. He was a man of high bearing, spotless character, and a chivalric sense of honor and duty; few men enjoyed a more unblemished reputation, both at home and abroad. In person he whs tall and slender, of attractive presence, and courteous manners; liberal in his charities; American in every aspiration of his nature. Mr. Hasbrouck’s oldest son, William H., is a practicing lawyer. His second son, Henry C., graduated at the West Point Military Academy, May, 1861; served as Lieutenant under Captain Griffin, 5th Artillery, U. 8. A,, in first Bull Run, also at Miner’s Hill and Newport News; promoted Captain 4th Artillery, and in service in the Modoc campaign. Roe, his third son, graduated at Harvard College in 1876. THE ROE FAMILY. The Roe family of Newburgh are the descendants of John Roe, born 1628, emigrated from Ireland in 1641, died in 1711, and his wife, Hannah Purrer, an emigrant from England. He settled at Brookhaven, L. I., in 1655. Of his children, Nathaniel married Hannah Reeve, and had five children, viz: 1. Nathaniel; 2. John; 3. Elizabeth; 4. Hannah; 5. Deborah. Nathaniel (1) married Elizabeth372 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Phillips,* and had eight children, viz: 1. Phillips; 2. James; 3. Eliz- abeth; 4. William; 5. Hannah; 6. Elizabeth; 7. Sarah; 8. Deborah—- of whom James (2) married Elizabeth Elting,*)* of Esopus, Ulster county, Oct. 19, 1770, and had: 1. James; 2. Elizabeth; 3. John E.; 4. Sylvester; 5. Ann; 6. William; 7. Nathaniel; 8. Rachel; 9. Peter- all of whom were bom in Kingston. He removed to Cornwall, Orange county, after the Revolution, where he married, second, the .widow of Comfort Sands, and died there in 1815. Of his children by his first wife—- William (6), born May 11,1781, died in Newburgh in 1868, married Maria, daughter of Thomas Hazard, of New York, and had : 1. Thomas Hazard; 2. Mary Elizabeth, married William C. Hasbrouck; 3. William James, married Anna Lawrence Clark; 4. Emily Maria. Early in life he went to New York where he was employed as a clerk by John Jacob Astor, and in that capacity made a voyage to Canton in one of Astor’s vessels in foreign trade. Subsequently he became a wholesale grocer and importer, from which he retired with an ample fortune. He removed to Newburgh in 1826, but engaged in no other business here than that of president of the Newburgh Whaling company. Peter (9), born Sept. 14, 1789, settled in New Windsor, where he married Susan, daughter of Jonas Williams,J and had: 1. Oswald W., died young; 2. Alfred C.; 3. James G.; 4. Susan E.; 5. William W.; 6. Peter; 7. Edward P.; 8. Mary Abigail. His sons, Rev. Alfred C. (2), and Rev. Edward P. (7), have more than a local reputation, the latter through his popular works, “Barriers Burned Away,’5 “ Opening of a Chestnut Burr,” etc. He acquired in political circles, the repu- tation of the first “abolitionist” in the county of Orange. A second Orange county branch of the family are the descendants of William (4), son of Nathaniel and Elizabeth (Phillips) Roe, who married Mary Van Duzer, of Cornwall, and whose sister Elizabeth, married Thomas Coleman of the same town. He became a resident of Cornwall after his marriage; was an active member of the Presby- terian church at Bethlehem, and was a captain in the continental ser- vice in the army of the Revolution. (Ante p. 279.) He subsequently removed to Danby, Tompkins county, N. Y. * Daughter of Rev. George Phillips, born at Rowley, Mass., 1664; died at Setauket, L. I., 1739. He was a graduate at Harvard in 1686; was minister at Setauket in 1697, and continued until his death in 1739. He was the son of Rev. Samuel Phillips, of Rowley, and grandson of Rev. George Phillips, of Boxworth, England, and afterwards first minis- ter of Watertown, Mass., having arrived with Governor Winthrop, in 1630. t Daughter of John Elting and his wife, Miss Whitaker. Mr. Elting afterwards married a sister of Col. Abraham Hasbrouck, of Kingston, and had one daughter, who married Sylvester Salisbury. t Jonas Williams was born on Long Island. He removed to Cornwall, during the Revo- lution, where he married Abigail, daughter of Samuel Brewster, who had settled on the Moodna in 1755 and established a saw-mill, and a forge and anchor shop. His son, Samuel Williams, was a merchant in Newburgh.BIO GBAPHTGAL SKETCHES. 373 A third branch arc the descendants of John Roe, who is presumed to have been a grandson of the first John. He settled in the precinct of Goshen prior to the Revolution, and had sons Nathaniel and Wil- liam, the former a captain of militia under its first organization, and of local distinction in other respects. Sylvester Roe, the first painter in Newburgh of record, was of this stock, and also Jefferson Roe. WOLVERT ACKER, OR ECKER. Wolvert Acker, or Ecker,* was the great-grandson of Jan Ecker, one of the early Dutch settlers of Greenburgh, Westchester county, and was born there Jan. 17, 1732. f He purchased, in 1772, the ex- treme northern part of the Harrison patent, and soon after removed to Newburgh, where he continued to reside until his death, which occurred on the 17th Jan. 1799, at the age of 67 years. J Mr. Eckeb was a man of generous heart and patriotic impulses. He entered warmly into the struggle for Independence ; contributed freely his time and his money to the cause, and from first to last was one of the most reliable men in the precinct. He was appointed chairman of the Committee of Safety for the precinct, in 1775, and took espe- cially under his cognizance the northern part of the town, where a strong feeling existed in favor of the Crown. His house soon became a favorite resort for the whigs in that sec- * tion of the country, and especially would they gather there on the Sabbath to learn the progress of events. On such occasions he would wait until a fair audience had assembled, and, after reading a chapter from his old Dutch Bible, would detail all the intelligence he had received ; the New York Packet, the whig paper of the day, was also read, and the affairs of the country discussed. In this manner he continually strengthened the hands and hearts of the friends of Liberty during the whole war. The tories he hated intensely; watched their movements with untiring zeal, and punished many of them for their depre- dations. After the war he engaged in milling, and in the manufacture of brick. He es- tablished the landing on the Hudson now known as Hampton, and also a ferry between that place and Wappinger’s Falls. His death was occasioned by a cancer on the face, from which he suffered for several years. Mr. Ecker was married twice. His first wife died without issue; his second was Sarah, daughter of William Pugsley, of Westchester county, by whom he had: (1) Isaac died unmarried. * It is so written in the early records of Westchester county, and by his son, Capt. Wm. Ecker. In the previous part of this work the name has been given Acker, as it is usually so spelled in the records. The name was probably Acker, and the change in the orthog- raphy evidently had its origin in the fact that the accented A has the sound of E, in Ger- man." Wol/ert and Wolnert are both used, as in the German v has the sound of our/. f Bolton, in his History of Westchester County, has the following reference to the Ecker family, and to the homestead originally held by them but subsequently by Washington Irving, and known as Sunny Side, viz: “ Van Tassel house occupies the site of ‘ Wolfert’s Boost, ’ which was built by Wolfert Ecker, an ancient Dutch burgher of this town (Green- burgh). In 1697, we find recorded the name of Jan Ecker, first accepted deacon of the Dutch church, Sleepy Hollow, which office he appears to have held for several years. By his wife, Magdalentje, he left issue Wolfert, Cornells, and others. The will of Wolfert Ecker bears date 1753, wherein he bequeaths to his ‘ son, Stephen, a cow, or the worth thereof, more than the others, for his birthright,’ and to his grandson, Wolfert Ecker, twenty shillings, besides other bequests.” Irving, in his Wolfert’s Boost, has immortal- ized both the homestead and the name of its ancient proprietor. . £ Inscription on the monument in the burial ground at Marlborough : “ In memory of Wolvert Ecker, who died Jan. 17,1779, aged 67 years. ‘A man of sorrows and acquaint- ed with grief.’”374 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH (2) Susan married first, Jos. Williams, and had Wolvert A., James, and Clementine; and second, Leonard Smith, and had William, who was drowned in the disaster to the sloop Neptune in 1824. (3) Deborah married Doct. John Pinckney, of Duchess county, a branch of the South Carolina stock of that name, and had Isaac, Caroline, Harriet, Edward, Julia, Theodore, and Deborah. (4) William married Sarah Badger, of Poughkeepsie, and had Theodore M., Clara, Phebe, Susan, William, Belinda, Harriet, Charles, George and Sarah. He was a man justly esteemed for many virtues; held several military commissions; served in the war of 1812, and died while a member of the legislature in 1827, in his 48th year. The following is the record of his children: Theodore M., married Harriet F. Brownson, daughter of Hon. Wm. A. Thompson, of Thompson, Sullivan county, and died in 1886, at St. Louis, leaving one daughter, Augusta T. Ecker, who married Rev. Duncan C. Niven.' William married in Georgia and died there, leaving three sons, Wolvert, Edward Badger, and Robert. Belinda marriod Philip J. Partenheimer, of Ithaca. Harriet resides in San Francisco, where she was married firpt to Wm. M. Eddy, formerly of New York, and second to George Hawks. George is a jeweler in San Francisco. Charles resides in San Francisco. Sarah, the youngest, mar- ried a Mr. Harvey of San Francisco, and resides there. (5) Phebe married Hon. John P. Jones, of Sullivan county, and- had Samuel, died in childhood, William, Perthenia, Mary, Henrietta, and Phebe. She died April 2, 1840.* (6) Sarah married James Lockwood of Norwalk, Conn., and had Catharine E., Harriet C., William E., Emma C., Helen M. (married Alex. Bell), Morris W., and John E. THE PENNY FAMILY. Joseph Penny was born in Wales, Eng. The time of his emigra- tion to this country is not known. His occupation was that of school- master, in which capacity he was employed by the trustees of the Glebe prior to the Revolution ;f he has also local reputation through a recipe for the cure of hydrophobia. J He purchased the Wallace patent, where he settled his sons, William, John, James, Peter, Joseph, Bobinson, Allen, and Isaac. His oldest daughter married Daniel Everett, of Ulster county; his second daughter, Polly, married James, son of Bobert Boss; Betsey married William Wilson, and Nelly died unmarried. William, the oldest son of Joseph Penny, was born May 29, 1759, and died Dec. 7, 1832. His wife, Hannah, was born June 20, 1761, and died Jan. 20, 1833. His son, William, died Jan. 31, 1849, aged 60 years, 2 months, and 17 days; and his wife, Mercy, died Nov. 4, 1857, aged 66 years. Descendants of Joseph Penny are now residents of Newburgh, Cornwall, Deerpark, etc. * See Quinlan’s History of Sullivan County, 5.52. f Ante p. 128, 338. ^ This recipe was engraved and copyrighted by Mr, Penny’s heirs, some years ago.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 375 JOHN NATHAN HUTCHINS. In addition to the facts already stated in the pages of this work,* in reference to the old teacher of the Glebe school, John Nathan Hutchins, the following obituary notice from the New York Packet of July 18,1782, can only be added, viz: “ Died—On Monday, 8th inst., in the eighty-second year of his age, after a short illness, greatly lamented, that reputable and useful citizen, noted mathematician and astronomer, Mr. John Nathan Hutchins. He was a person of excellent understanding, facetious and cheerful in his temper, charitable to the poor, a faithful husband and an obliging neighbor. He lived a pious and exemplary life; and as he lived, he died a sincere Christian; and has left his aged consort, who with his numerous acquaintances, regret his loss. His remains were decently interred in Newburgh the day following his death.” THE INNIS FAMILY. James Innis was brought to this country from Ireland, while an infant, about the year 1737. His mother and her sisters settled in Little Britain, where he received an education in the ordinary English branches, from George and James Clinton. He married Sybil Ross, of Morristown, N. J., and settled in Newburgh in 1780. His children were: 1. James; 2. Jane; 3.'Keziah; 4. Lydia; 5. Peter; 6. Benjamin; 7. Elsie; 8. Sarah; 9. William; 10. Aaron. James (1) died unmarried. He was a soldier in the army of the Revolution, and was in the battle of Monmouth. Jane (2) married William Irwin and removed to Ohio. Keziah (3) married James Owen. Lydia (4) married Moses Hanmore. Peter (5) died unmarried. Benjamin (6) married Margaret Denton. Elsie (7) married Thomas Aldrich. Sarah (8) married Anthony Presler. Aaron (10) married Ruth, daughter of Luff Smith. William (9) married Elizabeth,f daughter of James Warring, and had: Sally, married Isaac Denniston; Ross, married Catharine Cook; Rebecca, married Richard Ward, Jr.; Wygant; William, Jr., married Catharine Jessup; Aaron, married Phebe Ann Warring. THE EEEVE FAMILY. “The first of the family of the name of Reeve came to America from Wales, not far from 1660, and settled at Mattituck, L. I. Tra- dition says there were two brothers; their names Thomas and James. James, the progenitor of the Newburgh family, died at Mattituck in 1739, aged 60 years. His children were: 1. James; 2. Selah; 3. Isaac; 4. Nathaniel; 5. Ebenezer.”J Selah (2) settled on a farm near the old homestead. When the British obtained possession of Long Island they endeavored to enlist the inhabitants in favor of the king by offering them the oath of allegiance, accompanied with the assu- * Ante p. 179, 338. f Mrs. Innis was killed by being accidentally thrown from a wagon, Jan. 18,1846. % Griffin’s Journal. First Settlers of Mattituck, L. I., &c., by Augustus Griffin.376 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ranee that if they would accept it they should not only be exempt from molestation* but supplies for the troops would be purchased from them and paid for in gold. If the oath was rejected, however, the troops would seize whatever they might require* To secure ease and peace, many of the settlers embraced the terms offered; but there were those who esteemed the cause in which they were engaged too sacred to be bartered away thus lightly, and who refused the proffered terms. Selah Reeve was among the latter class. The British officers gave him three weeks in which to reconsider his determination, and intimated that if, at the expiration of that time, he still refused the oath, they would take possession of his property. During the interval granted, Mr. Reeve gathered together a small sum of money, obtained a fishing scow, and placed on board some provisions and clothing, and informed his family that they must be in readiness to leave their home at any moment; that when the officers made their next appearance, he should embark and escape. Prompt to their appointment, the officers returned at the expiration of the time which they had fixed; but Mr. Reeve discovered their approach in time to make his escape, reaching his vessel and casting off from the shore just as the officers had passed through the house and emerged from the back door. Waving his hand to his baffled pursuers, Reeve steered for the Connecticut shore, where he landed, and subsequently purchased an inland farm in that state, where he settled. After the war, he purchased (1784) a farm situated about three miles north of the then village of Newburgh, to which he removed soon after. He died Feb. 21, 1796, in his 55th year, and his wife died Jan 21, 1829, aged 84 years. His sons were: 1. Selah; 2. James; 3. Joseph. Selah Beeve (1) was first engaged in the milling business at Hunting-Grove (now Bus- kirk’s mills), on the Otterkill, in the town of New Windsor, sometime about the year 1798 or ’99* After a few years he returned to Newburgh and began the making of brown earthen ware—a new busi- ness at that time, and an article of manufacture in great demand. Mr. Burling was subsequently associated with him in this business, which was conducted on the east side of Smith street near South, and in con- nection with it they opened a crockery, glass, and earthen-ware store. He afterwards entered into the mercantile and forwarding business, associated with William H. Falls, as the successor of Jacob and Thomas Powell. He died April 11,1837, a few years after he had retired from business. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Christopher and Julia (Tusten*) Yan Duzer of Newburgh, in 1795, and had: 1. Millicent, d. in infancy; 2. Chris- topher; 3. Charles F. V.; 4. Julia Ann; 5. George; 6. Eliza; 7. Jane; 8. Nathan; 9. Harriet M.; 10. Mary E., d. in infancy; 11. Selah. Christopher (2) married Maria Hasbrouck, and * Julia Van Duzer was formerly Julia Tusten, a sister of Lieut. Col. Benjamin Tusten who was killed in the battle of Minnisink.377 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. had Selah V., Sarah E., Hasbrouck, and Louis. He was engaged in the mercantile and forwarding business in Newburgh for several years, and subsequently in the lumber trade at Detroit, where he died in 1863. Charles P. V. (3), married Adaline Amor, of New York; and after her death, Julia Ann Ferguson. He was an importing merchant in Charleston, S. C., for several years; subsequently engaged in business with his brother Christopher, in Newburgh, and in milling and farming at Shawangunk, Ulster county. He died in Newburgh, Oct. 12,1875, in his 76th year. Julia Ann (1) married Daniel S. Tuthill. George (5) married Caroline Ingersoll. He continued the mercantile business, at the old stand of his father, until his death in 1853 or ’54. Eliza (6) married Hon. John W. Brown; she died in 1874, leaving two sons, William B. and Charles P. Jane (7) married Alexander C. Mulliner. Nathan (8) married Mary, daughter of Selah Reeve Hobbie, of Washington. He studied law with Hon. John W. Brown, and practiced his profession in Newburgh for several years. Harriet M. (9), married Rev. Wm. McLaren. Selah (10), married Lilly Snow, of Providence, R. I.; died in Toledo in 1866. James Reeve (2) was a mariner from his youth. He was taken prisoner by the British, during the war of 1812, when within two days sail of New York, and carried to England and confined in Dartmoor prison. He was in this prison and a participant in the scenes enacted there on the 4th of July, 1813, and April 6th, 1814, as well as in all the horrors of that most horrible place. He escaped without injury from the massacre of April 6th, and on the final release of the prisoners, he returned to Newburgh. Not long after his return, however, he was seriously injured by the bursting of a lime kiln, and died in the course of a year. He was never married. Joseph Reeve (3) commenced the gold and silversmith business in 1804, and afterwards added to it the manufacture of whalebone whips, of which he was the patentee. He died in September, 1828, after an illness of several months, from an injury on the head caused by blows inflicted by two ruffians in the street. His wife was Eunice Sayre, by whom he had: 1. Charles, married Katura Wilson; was the successor Of his father in the silversmith business; 2. Decatur, married Frances A. Horton; 3. Anthony D., married a Miss Velt- mah; 4. Caroline, married Doct. J. D. Sloan, and left one son, James T. Sloan; 5. John, died unmarried. WILLIAM SEYMOUR. William Seymour was the son of Samuel Seymour, of Greenwich, Conn., where he was horn April 13, 1758. His first wife was Esther Sands, of Long Island, by whom he had: 1. William, 2. Samuel Sands, 3. Drake,* and 4. Esther. He married, second, Eliza, daughter of Henry Powell, of Long Island, and had: 5. Margaret, who married Joseph Kernochan, and 6. Mary Powell, who married James S. Abeel, of U. S. army. He removed to Newburgh about the year 1790, and commenced the mercantile business on the north-west corner of Water and Fourth streets, and soon after opened a branch store at Platte- kill. He subsequently engaged in ship-building here, and constructed, first, the Liverpool Packet; second, the William Perm, and third, the Ontario. These vessels were among the most successful in the Liver- pool trade. The Ontario was of five hundred tons burthen, and was the largest ship that sailed from New York at the time of her con- struction. He was also largely interested in real estate in Newburgh and its vicinity, and was active in promoting the interests of the town. In 1805, he accidentally tell into the hold of the ship Ontario, and re- * Drake Seymour was accidentally shot while on a hunting excursion, June, 1824, William resides in Brooklyn.378 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ceived injuries which rendered him unable to walk during the remain- der of his life. This accident obliged him to withdraw from business. He died in 1811. It is due to his memory to say, that none of the early settlers of the town contributed more to develop its business and commercial interests, or was more highly esteemed by his fellow- citizens. THE WARREN FAMILY. The Warrens, who are supposed to be of Norman origin, were among the earliest settlers of New England. Richard Warren was one of the pilgrims by the May Flower, and settled in Plymouth. John Warren came to America in 1630, and settled in Watertown, Mass. Another John Warren, supposed to have been a brother to Richard, settled in Salem in 1630. Peter Warren, who was probably a son of John of Salem, settled in Salem, and from him Genl. Joseph Warren, the patriot of Bunker Hill, was a lineal descendant.* The earliest mention of the name in Newburgh occurs in. the rec- ords of the First Presbyterian church, where, under date of July 23, 1783, the marriage of “ John Warren of Mass., and Elizabeth Belknap, of Newburgh/5 is written. In reference to the genealogy of this branch of the family it appears that John Warren came to America in 1630, and settled in Watertown, Mass. His children were John, Mary, Daniel, and Elizabeth, who were probably all bom in England. Daniel married Mary Barron, Dec. 10, 1650, and had nine children, of whom the seventh was John, b. March 5th, 1665, and who married Mary Brown. He had three children, of whom John (b. March 15, 1684 5), had two children, viz: Beulah, b. Aug. 23, 1725, married John Hobbs, of Brookfield; and Josiah, b. Feb. 17, 1714-15. The latter married Hepzibah Hobbs, by whom he had ten children, f John Warren, the youngest child of Josiah Warren, was left an orphan during his in- fancy, and was taken by his aunt, Beulah, wife of John Hobbs, of Brookfield, where he resided until he arrived at the age of nineteen years, when he joined the army of the Revo- lution, and participated in its struggles until the peace of 1783. He was engaged in several of the most important battles of the war, and received particular commendation for his bravery at Bunker Hill and at Monmouth, and was subsequently raised to the rank of cap- tain. He came with the Massachusetts line to the encampment at New Windsor. While here he became acquainted with Miss Belknap, a lady remarkable for her intelligence and personal attractions,^ to whom he was married at the date already given. After the dis- bandment of the army, he engaged in business pursuits in Newburgh; but subsequently re- moved to Troy, and afterwards to Saratoga Springs, where he died, Dec. 25,1823—his wife surviving him until June 21,1837. Their children were : 1. John H., b. 1786, died at Mon- tezuma, N. Y., 1823, married Fanny Kellogg, and had one child, William L. F.; 2. Cynthia M., b. Aug. 2,1788, married Miles Beach, of Saratoga Springs; 3. Stephen R., born Nov. * Genealogy of Warren, by J. C. Warren, M. D. f Bond’s Genealogies of Watertown. $ Miss Belknap is said to have been the partner of Genl. Washington, in the opening set of the ball given at. the Temple, April, 1783, on the announcement of the exchange of the preliminary articles of peace.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 379 1790 ; 4. William L. F., b. Feb. 4,1793 ; 5. Elizabeth B., b. 1795, married Doct. R. R. Davis, of Syracuse; 6. Caroline $., b. 1798, married Benjamin Carpenter, of Newburgh; 7. Mary A., b. 1800, married James H. Darrow, of Saratoga Springs. William L. F. Warren (4), the son of John H. Warren (1), came to Newburgh early in life, and engaged as clerk with his uncle, Mr. Carpenter. In 1837, he became a member of the firm of B. Carpenter & Co., with which he was associated until its dissolution. He, filled for several terms, and with marked ability, the post of president of the Board of Trustees of the village ; was one of the Board of Water Commissioners, and also of the Board of Alms-house Commissioners ; director in the Savings Bank of Newburgh, and in the Warwick Yalley Railroad, and prominent in other public and private enterprises, earn- ing for himself the distinction of one of those rare men upon whom the community rely for protection against ill-advised and oppressive legislation, rather than that of the politi- cal charlatan whose thirst for distinction leads him regard lightly the public interests. He married Catharine, daughter of John H. Walsh. Another branch of the family is that of Miles Warren, a resident of Newburgh for many years. His grandfather was James Warren, of Woodbridge, now Bethany, Conn., who married Abigail Thomas and had: Jason, Sarah, Rachel, Abigail, Nathaniel, Jemima, Edward, and Richardson.* His son Richardson, was killed during the Revo- lution, on board the American frigate Trumbull, by a cannon ball which passed through both thighs. His son Nathaniel, was bom Jan. 15, 1755, and married Susanna, daughter of Isaac Johnson, of Sey- mour, Conn., by whom he had six children, viz: Betsey, Charles, Marshall, Isaac, Miles, Susan. Miles was bom at Bethany, Conn., July 4, 1790, died in Newburgh, 18—. He married, first, Sally Coe (1810) by whom he had: George T., William S., Edward R. (died), Edward R. M. (died), Sarah A. H. (died), and John W. Mrs. Sally Warren died April 13, 1855, and he married (1856) Ruth, daughter of James Miller, of Crawford, Orange county, by whom he had: Anson Miles, b. May 13, 1858. He was a maker and a dealer in boots and shoes in Newburgh, and also in Detroit, Mich. Isaac, the fourth son of Nathaniel Warren, was born in Bethany, Conn., Dec. 23, 1787. He married, Sept. 12, 1812, Leonora, daugh- ter of Israel Perkins, and had: Israel P., William E., Susan H., Isaac W., Harris F., Cornelia A., and George F. William E. Warren, the second son of Isaac, came to Newburgh in the spring of 1836. Having previously served an apprenticeship of three years as a clerk in a manufacturing . establishment at Waterbury, he readily obtained a situation with D. Crawford & Co., as book-keeper and cashier, where he remained until the spring of 1841. He subsequently engaged in mercantile business in Newburgh and New York, from which he retired in 1851. He soon after received the appointment of Auditor of the N. Y. & E. Railroad Co., which post he resigned in 1853, to accept that of Secretary and Treasurer of the Delaware, Lack- awanna and Western Railroad Co., of which he was afterwards elected a director. He re- signed his connection with this company in the spring of 1858; and in 1859, received the appointment of Deputy Comptroller of the city of New York, which he filled one term, and subsequently engaged in the occupation of an accountant. He married, March 25, 1840, Lydia Riggs, daughter of Charles and Amelia Birdsall, and has one daughter, Mary Cushman Warren, married Rev. George D. Silliman. ♦New Haven Records.380 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH THE CARPENTER FAMILY. The Newburgh family of this name are the descendants of Benja- min Carpenter, who was born in England in 1730. He emigrated to this country at an early age, and settled on Long Island, from whence he removed to Latintown (then in the town of Newburgh), Ulster county, where he resided until his death. He married (1764) Jane, daughter of the Rev. Mr. Leonard, of Goshen, and had six children, “of whom,” says Mr. Eager,* “Jacob and Leonard Carpenter were two. These gentlemen, when young, were ship-builders, and con- tributed largely to promote the interests of Newburgh. They were afterwards the owners of the Newburgh ferry, and were also engaged in mercantile and commercial pursuits.” Leonard Carpenter married Bridget, daughter of Isaac Belknap, and had seven children, viz: (1) Benjamin, born Feb. 14, 1793, married Caroline S., daughter of John Warren, of Saratoga Springs, and had: 1. MaryF., who married Lewis M. Strong, of Northampton, Mass.; 2. John W., died in infancy; 3. Warren, died in 1849 ; 4. Alida Josepha, married Horatio B. Reed. Mr. Carpenter was engaged in the forwarding business in Newburgh from 1817 to 1865. He sustained during his whole career an unblem- ished reputation. He died January 31st, 1871; Mrs. Carpenter died April 5th, 1856. (2) Elizabeth, married Wm. Thayer,*)* April 2, 1812, and had: 1. William L.; 2. John S., married Catharine, daughter of Jirah Stearns, formerly of Pittsfield, Mass. ; Elijah C., married Mary J., daughter of Hamilton Morrison, of Montgomery; 4. George A.; 5. Charles F., married Anna F., daughter of Lewis Miller, of New Windsor; Anna B., married Henry W. Dolson; 7. Caroline M., and 8. Elizabeth C. (3) Isaac R., unmarried; was at one time owner of the Newburgh ferry, and put the first steamer, the Post-Boy, on it; he also erected the United States hotel, built the “long dock,” and laid out and open- ed, at different times, more miles of streets than any other citizen of his own or earlier times. Several dwellings of a superior class and Other substantial contributions to progress are due to him.J (4) Jane Belknap, unmarried. (5) Alexander L., married Elizabeth Lawrence, of Fishkill. He died at his residence in Ohio, October 1, 1848, leaving Sarah L., Isaac L., and Lawrence F. (6) Sarah Lydia Steams, unmarried. (7) Cynthia Warren, married Francis Crawford. * Eager’s Orange County, 161, &e. f William Thayer was born in Brooklyn, Windham county, Conn., Sept. 21,1784. He settled in Newburgh about the commencement of the present century, and, in company with his brother, J ohn Thayer, was engaged in an extensive and successful business for several years. He died April 9,1856. J Ante p. 201, 252, etc.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 381 Hugh Walsh, whose family was of English origin, emigrated from the vicinity of Belfast, Ireland, in the year 1764 He settled at Phila- delphia, Pa., where he was employed in the office of a Mr. Buchanan, a shipping merchant, but subsequently removed to New York, where he engaged in business, and where he married (1775) Catharine, daughter of Mrs. Jane Armstrong. During the closing years of the Revolution it is presumed that he was engaged in furnishing supplies to the American army at Peekskill, Fishkill and Newburgh. On one of his visits to the latter place, he purchased from Benjamin Smith (Feb. 22, 1782,) lots No. 8, 21, and 36, of the Township of Washing- ton (ante p. 159)^ being one half of the blocks bounded on the east by the river, north by Fourth street, and west by Smith street, for which he paid $130 “in specie.” He made no settlement on his pur- chase ; but in 1790 (April 26), he purchased from Governor George Clinton the northern part of the Chambers and Sutherland patent,* including the farm on which his son, the late John H. Walsh, resided from 1809 until his death in 1853. Residing for a year on that part of the tract now known as Windsor Hill, the property of Thos. W. Chrystie, he removed in 1791 to Newburgh and purchased the north- east corner of Water and Second streets, including the lands under water, whereon he built a dock and store-house, “ opposite to the new market,” (the former known for a time as Walsh’s dock, now occu- pied by the Maillers,) for a general merchandise and freighting busi- ness, the latter from Newburgh to New York and Albany, which he continued until 1804, but sold his store to John Shaw in 1799. Mr. Walsh also engaged in several other business enterprises. In 1792, with James Craig,f he built the paper mill afterwards owned by his son, John H. Walsh, and now by his grandson, J. DeWitt Walsh. About 1794, he erected a dwelling house on Water street (afterwards the famous Mansion House J), where he resided until 1808, when he removed to a more retired residence which he had built on a plot of ground fronting on the north side of Western Avenue and bound- * The property was purchased from the heirs of William Chambers by Nathan Smith in 1758. After the death of the latter, Clinton was the purchaser. The price paid by Mr. Walsh was £1500,N. Y. currency. The property included the water front on the Hudson and the land running west on the south side of Quassaick creek. f Father of the late Hon. Hector Craig, of Craigville.. $ Ante p. 200.382 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ed by Grand and Liberty streets. Surrounded by his family, and kindly known among neighbors and friends, and especially the clergy to whom his house was a home, he here spent the evening of his life He died in 1817, in the 72d year of his age. Mr. Walsh' was one of the most active citizens of Newburgh in every thing relating to its improvement, and more especially in ad- vancing its religious and educational interests. This fact, however, is so amply shown in other parts of this work that it is not necessary to do more than refer to it here. His family consisted of eight chil- dren, viz: 1. Jane; 2. Eliza, married Solomon Sleight (afterwards Judge of Common Pleas), and left no surviving issue; 3. James, mar- ried Elizabeth, daughter of Alex. Robertson, settled in New York and engaged in mercantile business. He died suddenly, while on a visit to Richmond, Ya., leaving five children, some of whom now reside in New York. 4. Samuel Armstrong, who was a physician and for seve- ral years the surgeon of the West Point Military Academy. He mar- ried Hester G., daughter of Pascal N. Smith, of New York, and died without issue in 1829. 5. John H., late of New Windsor, whose char- acter as a man of business, an upright citizen, and a conscientious Christian, was widely known. He married Elizabeth, daughter of John DeWitt,* formerly of Duchess county, and left issue seven chil- dren, some of whom are settled in Newburgh and its vicinity. He died in 1853, and his widow in 1875. 6. Catharine, married David Andrews of New York; 7. Mary Ann; 8. Charlotte, married the Rev. Jas. M. Matthews, first Chancellor of the University of New York. THE DEGROVE FAMILY. Peter Adolph DeGrove, the founder of the American family of that name, was one of the French (Huguenot) settlers of New York, where he conducted mercantile business in 1737. He had three children, viz: 1. Adolph, who removed to the Island of Jamaica, where he died leav- ing issue Peter, who returned to America and settled in Boston; 2. Peter, who married Rebecca----, and had Peter, who died unmarried; Adolph, who settled in Newburgh; Rachel, who married Capt. John Anderson (1738) and left no surviving descendants; and Rebecca, who married an Albertson, and has descendants in the Stryker, Law- rence, and Crolius families of New York; 3. Aefie, who married Gar- ret Schuyler, a merchant of New York. * John T)e Witt (erroneously printed DeWint, p. 184) was of a Holland family and a na- tive of the county of Duchess, where he was elected to the Assembly in 1786, ’88, and ’94, and sheriff 1789 to ’97. He removed to Newburgh in 1806, and continued his residence here until his death. He was especially active in the construction of the Newburgh and Cochec- ton Turnpike, and previous to the commencement of that work had made large purchases of land m Sullivan county. It is said that he caused the first land to be cleared and the first road to be made in the present town of Callicoon, and that his son Andrew built the first house in that town (1813). He died in 1808.—Quinlan's Sullivan County, 161.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 383 J Adolph, the son of Peter DeGrove (2) was one of the refugees from New York, at the time of the occupation of that city by the English forces.’ He settled in Newburgh in 1777 or ’78, and established a hotel on the south-west corner of Water iand Third streets, which he conducted for several years; he subsequently removed to the opposite side of the street, where he also conducted a bakery. He took an active part in the organization of the First Presbyterian church, of which he was a member. He died Nov. 29, 1796, in his 76th year. He married first, a Miss Lawrence, and had: (1) Adolph, Jr., who was an assistant quartermaster at Newburgh (1780), and had charge of the stores which were accumulated here from time to time for the use of L+S-*7 the army. He married (1769) Rhoda Coles, of Queens coun- ty, and had: 1. Robert 0., married a Miss Smith and left one son, who died without issue; 2. Adolph L., married Catharine Gallow, of Newburgh, and had eight children, viz: Edward W., who had two sons; Stephen C., died un- married; Charles H., left one child; Adolph L., unmarried; Eliza, married Dr. Wooster Beach; Catharine, married Noah Tompkins; Rebecca Jane, married William Clark; and Sarah; 3. John; 4. Coles; 5. Samuel—all of whom died unmarried; and 6. Sarah, who married John Mitchell, of L. I., and left’no surviving issue. (2) William, who left issue two sons, Michael and Quin- £6/ /(y u ( sey,and one daughter, Sarah. Quinsey died without issue, Dec. 1860. Michael had several children.— Sarah married a Mr. Sobietes. (3) John, who probably married and left issue. (4) Sarah, who married first, a Mr. Rivers, by whom she had Sarah who married a Mr. Hartwich; and second, Enoch Carter. (5) Mary, who married a Captain Smith, and left issue Benjamin and Rebecca. —The second wife of Adolph DeGrove was Mary, sister of Enoch Carter, by whom he had no issue.384 HIS TOBY OF NEWBUBGH. THE CARTER FAMILY. Enoch Carter, from whom the family in Newburgh of that name descended, was a native of Philadelphia—a Quaker in creed, raising his children in that faith, and of English ancestry. He had one brother, Joseph Carter, who was ah officer in the English navy, and who died unmarried, and one sister, Mary, who was the second wife of Adolph DeGrove.* He removed to New York prior to the .Revo- lution, and prosecuted there the occupation of a tanner and currier. Although restrained by his religious creed from taking an active part in the struggle for independence, he made no concealment of his po- litical sympathies, and hence, when the English obtained possession of the city, he was compelled to abandon his property there, and to seek personal safety within the American lines. He located near Fort Montgomery, where he constructed vats and resumed the manufacture of leather; but returned to New York, after peace was declared, and resided there until his death in 1792. Mr. Carter married Sarah Rivers, a widowed daughter of Adolph DeGrove by his first wife, and had six children, viz: 1. Jonathan; 2. Adolph, who married Ann McDowell of New York, and had: George, Joseph, Sarah, Ann, Mary, Margaret (married Sami. Reeve), Richard, and Elizabeth; 2. Margaret, who married R. Henry Richards, and who had two children, viz: Henry, who died at the age of 13 years, and James, who died at the age of 31 years leaving issue Sarah, who mar- ried Doct. Chas. Peck, and Henry W. 4. Mary, who married Benja- min Halstead, eldest brother of the late Capt. Charles Halstead of Newburgh. She died in her 29th year, leaving one child, Margaret R., who married Sami. T. Callahan. 5. Enoch, who died at the age of 20 years, without issue. 6. Rebecca, who married a Mr. Rose, and who has descendants residing in the vicinity of Fort Montgomery. _ . Jonathan (1), /OiA^tC~0 the oldest son of Y/ I Enoch Carter, ^ \^s// was born in New York, Nov. 2, 1772. He continued the business which his father had conducted in New York, and provided for the support of his father’s * Mrs. Mary (Carter) DeGrove died April 20,1824, in her 85th year. Referring to her death, the Political Index of April 27, remarks: “ Few persons have sustained a long life so usefully and irreproachably as the subject of this notice. Mrs. DeGrove was almost the last of that class of exalted females which adorned the society of our village in former times. The dames DuBois, DeGrove, Riggs, Carpenter, Bowman, and a few others who might be named, maintained by their education, piety and virtue, that distinction under a democracy which a regal government conferred upon rank, Their manners were formed in the higher, circles before the Revolution, and were admirably maintained. Those who have enjoyed their society will long remember the high-toned urbanity, the excellent edu- cation, the exalted piety, the charity of feeling and benevolence of action which marked all their intercourse with society and commanded its adniiration. But it is a part of our nature to perish; and they have been gathered to the home of their fathers, full of years, full of honors, and we hope, crowned with immortal life,’’BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 385 family, until 1798, when the latter was broken up under the panic caused by the yellow fever. He then came to Newburgh, where, with the assistance of his aunt, Mrs. DeGrove, he opened (1799) a store for the manufacture and sale of tobacco, and he continued in that business until his death. He was thrice married—first, to Elizabeth, daughter of John Anderson, Jr., who died (1799) in her 17th year, without issue;* second, to Bridget, daughter of Benj. Smith, who died in 1803 leaving one child, Elizabeth, who married Ward M. Gazlay; third, to Jane Linderman,j* who died in 1830, leaving issue: 1. Enoch; 2. Margaret, who married Levi D. Woolsey; 3. Catharine, who mar- ried Henry Byer, and 4. Charles. Mr. Carter died May 30, 1820, in his 48th year. He was highly esteemed by the community, and “in all his relations he sustained an upright and worthy character.” Enoch Carter, oldest son of Jonathan Carter, was for several years identified with the political, social and business history of Newburgh. In early life he shipped on one of the Newburgh Whaling Company’s ves- sels ; and after his return commenced the tobacco business in a store opposite the Highland Bank, where he remained until he had opportunity, through the death of Mr. Wiley (his father’s successor), to purchase the stock and take possession of his father’s old place of business, in which he continued the trade until a few years before his death. He took a deep interest in politics; was frequently the candidate of the Democratic party for local positions, and represented it in stato and national conventions, gaining a reputation more than local. His charac- ter was two-fold—the outward, springing associations by sea and land into which he was thrown ; and the inward, actuated by kindly sympathies and noble purposes. Of the first it is Hot necessary to speak, as it was that in which he was most frequently met—a compound of Quaker faith and charity, and of the rudeness of the quarter-deck; but in the latter, he gave many evidences of a strong, quick and original mind, developed by habits of thought and observation. Perhaps none of the active men of his generation evinced a deeper interest in the prosperty of his native place than he, and certainly none were more self-sacrificing in advancing measures designed to give to it character abroad. If “a liberal mind deviseth liberal things,” then was he most liberal, for he never wearied in devising objects designed to confer some lasting good; and if not “by apostolic blows and knocks,” by equally potent means he succeeded in grafting many of his suggestions upon public and private policy. He was the originator of the plan for separating the town * John Anderson and John Anderson, Jr., were early merchants of Newburgh, but it is not known that they sustained any* relationship. The former married Jane McB-oberts in 1780. His wife died in 1815, in her 45th year; and he died in 1816, in his 52d year. The latter married Maria., daughter of Benjamin Smith sometime about 1772. His daughter, Elizabeth, married Jonathan Carter, and his family is represented by Hiram Anderson, now or late of New York. Mrs. Carter died of yellow fever—the first and, it is said, the only case of that disease in Newburgh. t The Lindermans are of German ancestry. They were among the early settlers of the town of Crawford, and the family is still numerous in this county and in Ulster. 025386 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. from the county in the support of the poor, which has proved his assumption that there- by the poor would be better and more economically provided for. The erection of a new county with Newburgh for its shire-town, he urged as being dictated by the convenience of the people interested and their due influence in the government; and though not suc- cessful, the seed sown has a firm rooting. To local improvements of every kind he was a liberal contributor; while to his antiquarian tastes and to his reverence for the memory of the founders of the nation, the public are mainly indebted for the valuable collection of manuscripts and other relics which are deposited in Washington’s Head-quarters, as well as for the rescue of that property from the grasp of private speculation and the care with which the mansion has been preserved. He was one of the founders of the Mechanics’ Library Association, and gave to it a large collection of minerals ; manifested a deep in- terest in the success of free schools and a free library, and at one time prepared his will for the endowment of a school of design. Indeed, the predominant trait in his disposition was to be practically useful; to be instrumental in conferring permanent benefits upon the community, and especially to surround the young with incentives to lead worthy lives and with advantages and associations of which his own experience had taught him the neces- sity. His last work was the Cedar Hill Cemetery, in which his remains were the first to be interred. He died in Newburgh, January 14,1872, after an illness of short duration. JOSEPH HOFFMAN. Joseph Hoffman was born in New York about 1*773. Although very little is positively known in reference to to the subject, it is believed that he was a descendant of one of the early Dutch burghers of that city, but it is equally probable that, he sprung from one of the Palatine immigrants of 1710.* He came to Newburgh 1793, in the employ of Adolph DeGrove; but subsequently, in com- pany with his brother, John Hoffman, purchased the establishment from Mrs. DeGrove, and continued it as a bakery and confectionery. He remained with his brother until 1804, when he erected a building on the north-west corner of Water and Second streets, and began business on his own account,f and continued it until his death. Mr. Hoffman was eminently a just man. He was educated in the Lutheran faith, and was attached to that church until he became a resident of Newburgh. As there was no organization of that denomi- nation here, however, he united with St. George’s church, at the time of its reorganization (1805), and held an active and influential mem- bership in that body during the remainder of his life. He was a quiet, unassuming man, an upright citizen and a sincere Christian. Mr. Hoffman was a member of the board of trustees of the village for several terms, and was also one of the trustees of the Glebe. In these and in several less important public trusts, he was remarkable for the faithful manner in which he discharged his duties. He was a man of good common sense, had a thorough appreciation of right, * The Hoffmans were of Swedish origin. In the time of Gustavus Adolphus, they re- moved to Germany and became distinguished in Dutch and German literature. In Scan- dinavian, the name is Hoppman—in German, Hoffman, or “ Child of Hope.”—Iiolgate. f Ante p. 174, 198. John Hoffman removed to the province of New Brunswick.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 387 above all he had a disposition that was not easily ruffled. These traits in his character exhibited themselves in his every act, and won for him the respect of all. In his personal appearance and in his habits, especially during the latter part of his life, he was a type of the ancient Knickerbockers, and had his dress been less modern the resemblance would have been complete. Mr. Hoffman married Maria, daughter of Abraham W. Yan Deusen, of New York, and had: 1. Eliza Ann, who married Robert Reeve and had Fanny M., Catharine, Adaline H., Henrietta H., Hoffman, and Robert. 2. Mary, who married Paddock Chapman* and had Mary E., married William H. Gerard; Joseph H. H., married Lydia W. Sanxay; Catharine M.; Susan A., married Ithamar D. Phelps; Debo- rah A.; Thomas P., married Lydia Crist; Isaac C., married Letitia Kennedy; Charles F., married Agnes Hamilton; James L., died 1840; William G., married Emetine Welch; Caroline G., married Henry Hunter; and Louisa. 3. Catharine, who married William Scott,f and had Maria J., married Calvin Sloat; Harriet L.; Cornelia E.; Sarah E., and Anna, married Jas. L, Teller. 4. Abraham Y. D., died in his 14th year. 5. Susan, died young. 6. Harriet Amelia, married John D. Phillips, and had Maria H., Joseph H., John D., Adaline, Clark, and Edmund. 7. Adaline, married David Howell, died without issue. 8. Cornelia E., married Edmund S. Sanxay, J and left issue Frederick D., Charles D.? and George W. 9. Cecelia A., married Nelson Haight and had Henry M., Robert W., Joseph H., Abraham, and Charles E. 10. Sarah A., and 11. Jane. Mr. Hoffman died Nov. 16, 1852, aged 79. years, and his wife, Maria, died June 4,1869, in her 94th year. THE ROBERT GARDINER FAMILY. James Gairdner, the paternal ancestor of this family, was a native of Glascow, Scotland. His wife was a Miss M’Nair; and their children were: 1. Robert; 2. James; 3. Margaret; 4. Cecelia—of whom Robert Gardiner (1) was born May 31, 1769. He emigrated to America in 1789 or ’90, and settled temporarily in Duchess county, but soon after removed to Newburgh, where he was first employed as. a clerk in the store of Mr. Hugh Walsh, and afterwards with John Anderson and John McAuley. To conform his family name to the American idiom, he transposed the letter i, placing it after the letter d, rendering it Gardiner. He relin- quished the occupation of clerk in 1795, and opened, on the. south-west corner of Water and Fourth streets, a general store, and adjoining it (on the site now occupied by Chap- man’s drug store) what was then termed a “ Coffee House ”—the latter the first establish- * Mr. Chapman was a descendant of Ralph Chapman, of Southwark, Eng., who settled in Duxbury, Mass.., in 1635. He was born in Southeast, Putnam county; removed to New- burgh about 1810; married Mary Hoffman, May 4,1820; died April 2,1865. f William Scott married, first, Sarah, daughter of John Spier, who left issue Francis Scott, who served as cashier of the old Bank of Newburgh, treasurer of the city, etc. $ Edmund S. Sanxay married, first, Eliza, daughter of Mark McIntyre, who left issue Edmund S. Sanxay. Mr. Sanxay was the son of Edmund and Lydia (Belknap) Sanxay, who left issue Charlotte (married a Sandford), Edmund S., John H., Stephen, and Lydia W. (married Joseph H. H. Chapman.)388 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ment of the kind in Newburgh—and was first to introduce the drinking of ale beer. His house soon became a favorite resort; and his pewter pint cups, with their engraved wreath enclosing the initials, “ R. G..” were a pleasant memory to many old citizens. In 1802, he became a citizen, and from that time until 1812, was variously engaged as a school-master, captain of a sloop, painter, and merchant, and finally established a confectionery and toy store. In 1812, he was ordered, with the company of militia of which he was first lieuten- ant, to Staten Island, where he remained about three months. Soon after , his return the reign of shin-plasters commenced, and “ among the many individuals and corporations by whom they were issued,” remarks Mr. Eager, “none had a greater circulation than Robert Gardiner’s small bills. Some idea may be formed of the extent of the circulation of shin- plasters at that time, when the fact is stated, that the average weekly amount taken in exchange for bank bills and his own, together with what he received in the course of business, amounted to no less than $2,000.” * Mr. Gardiner married first (1791), Jane, daughter of Benj. Smith, and had: 1. James M., born Oct. 21, 1792; 2. Robert S., died young; 3. Robert S., born October 29, 1795; 4. Cecelia B., born July 11,1799. Mrs. Jane Gardiner died in 1803, and he married, Feb. 19, 1801, Sybil Burr, and had: 5. Jefferson Y. V.; 6. Arabella J. G. Y. Y.; 7. Cicero A., died Feb. 21,1875; 8. Demosthenes C.; 9. Iduella T. R.; 10. Lawrence L.; 11. Marion A.; 12. Zelima; 13. Franklin M.; 11. Lewis W., married Frances Emily Ferry; 15. Baron Steuben; 16. Anastesia M., married Lewis H. Stansbrough. He died March 3,1831, on a small farm; which he had named Mount Airy, situate a short distance west of Newburgh. His wife, Sybil, died in 1851. James M’Naib Gardiner (1), the oldest son of Robert and Jane Gardiner, received his early education in Newburgh. At the age of 16 years, he commenced the study of medicine under Dr. Gidney; and was subsequently a private pupil to Doct. Mott, of New York, for eighteen months. He coifimenced practice in 1813, and his services were ih constant requisition from that time until Oct. 1st, 1857, when he was confined to his resi- dence by a chronic illness which terminated his life (Dec. 8th) the following year. In conversa- tion with him a short time prior to his death, he informed the writer that, before he had been a pupil for one year, so great was the demand for the services of a physician, that he was thrust forward by his instructor into practice; and that, before he was 17 years of age, he had attended with success several difficult cases of child-birth. “ May God forgive me for any errors in practice that I may have committed then,” said he, “ but I done the best for suffering humanity that I could. And since that time, how many of the first accents of the living, and the farewells of the dying, have fallen upon my ear. I have seen suffering in all its forms; have had, what few physicians can claim, two cases of triplets—one all boys, and the other all girls—pass through my hands into this breathing world; and, as a general rule, I may claim,—and I am too near my grave to be accused of boasting,—a most successful practice.” The concurrent testimony of the community in which Doct. Gardiner practiced for nearly half a century, establishes beyond question his thorough acquaintance with disease in all its forms; and the demand for his services, at all times as great as he could respond to, attests his skill. In his intercourse with society, or with his patients, he was always pleasant and agreeable; and many instances are related where the sick forgot their pains, and rallied into new life, as he imparted .cheerfulness to the chamber of suffering by his queer stories, which few knew better how to relate. He was a man of good literary taste and cultivation; was familiar with most of the standard writers of Great Britain, as well * The issue of small bills, referred to by Mr. Eager, was occasioned by the scarcity, of specie which was drawn from circulation to meet the requirements of the army. The Board of Trustees of the village printed and circulated several reams of this currency, ranging from 6| to 50 cents, which was redeemed at the Bank of Newburgh. tBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 389 as his own country; quoted with facility from Shakspeare and Scott; and was a frequent contributor to the literary associations of which he was a member, and to the public press. He married, first, Maria, daughter of Josiah Vail, of Wallkill, and had: 1. Robert W.; 2. Lucy Ann Cornelia, married Dr. Daniel Wells, of New York. Mrs. Maria Gardiner died in 1824, and he married, second, Caroline H., daughter of David Havens, of Cornwall, and had: 3. Maria A., married Charles Smith, of Newburgh, died May 2,1855; 4. James H., died young; 5. Walter S.; 6. Caroline H.; 7. James H., died young; 8. Emma Jane, mar- ried Charles Stewart, of Newburgh; 9. James M.; 10. Henry C. James M. (9), an ama- ture astronomer, was the discoverer of what is known as Gardiner’s Comet. THE JOHN BROWN FAMILY. John Brown was a native of Monaghan, Ireland, where he conduct- ed business as a dealer in hardware and books and stationery; he also had printing in connection with his establishment. In the events pre- ceding the Irish Rebellion of 1798, he expressed his sympathies with the reforms demanded, and as freedom of opinion was not tolerated by the English, he soon found the officers of the government on his track. Knowing his fate if arrested, he slipped a roll of guineas in his pocket and secured a passage in a vessel on the eve of sailing for New York. His wife and family remained in Ireland, closed up his business there, and followed him to America in 1800. Mr. Brown came to Newburgh almost immediately after his arrival in this country; and, with the assistance sent on by his wife, opened what he called an “Universal Store.”* It was the first store of the kind in Newburgh, and he enjoyed a large trade. He subsequently erected the building now No. 69 Water street; sold his books and confined his attention mainly to hardware, in which his sons, John and James S., were his successors. He died Oct. 1, 1825, in his 67th year.f His wife was Alice Chichester, a lady of Scotch . parentage; she died Sept. 14, 1829. Their children were: 1. Chichester, born Jan. 20, 1783, died August 8, 1849; married Catharine, daughter of Doct. Graham, of Shawangunk, and had: 1. John James, married Mary R. Yan Arsdale, who died March 5, 1855, leaving one son, Chichester; 2. George, died in 1870; married Jeanet, daughter of George Bruce, of New York, and had Bruce B. 2. John, married Eliza Case, of Goshen; died in 1852 without issue. 3. James S., married, first, Sarah Haines; had Hannah, Jane, Ann * The character of the business which was conducted by Mr. Brown will be better un- derstood by stating, that he kept for sale “Hardware, Jewelry, Iron-mongery, Nails, Hollow-ware, Looking-Glasses, Window Glass, Paints and Oil, China, Glass, Delft, Bristol and Stone-ware, Bibles, School Books, Novels, Histories, Dr. Owen’s Prophetical Sermon, Groceries, Wines, Brandy, Gin, and Spirits.” , 4t The Gazette, of concurrent date, remarks: “ The death of Mr. Brown will be sensibly felt by the community, of which he was an honorable and esteemed member; and the church to which he was attached has suffered a loss which will long be remembered with painful emotions. Possessed of ample means and a heart always open to the calls of charily, he was a father to the fatherless; and the afflicted never called on him in vain. His grave will be watered with the tears of gratitude, and his memory will be cherished with respect for his Virtues, and affection for his benevolence. ”366 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. dence (the old homestead of his father) was the cradle of' Methodism in Newburgh.* He wa,s born in the year 1757, and died Jan. 22,1830. By his first wife, Rebecca Gidney, he had: 1. Purdy; 2. Mary, married George Wandell; 3. Charlotte. By his second wife, Mary Clapp, he had; 4. Henry; 5. Rebecca, married George Grove; 6. Electa, married Dr. James Smith; 7. Samuel; 8. Charlotte, married Henry Cox. Purdy (1) married Char- lotte Tooker, and had six children; Henry (4) married Eliza Ann Thorne and had one child. Samuel (7) married Susan Phillips. (2) Isaac married Margaret Theall, and had Isaac, Jr., who married Glorianna, daughter of Caleb Merritt, and sister of Elizabeth, wife of Doct. David Fowler. The children of Isaac, Jr., and Glorianna were: 1. Caleb, born Feb. 8, 1775, died March 8, 1826; 2. Martha; 3. Doct. Charles; 4. Gilbert; 5. Nehemiah; 6. David; 7. Doct. Francis; 8. Doct. Isaac. Caleb (1) married Catharine Sebring, a granddaughter of Isaac Sebring and Catharine Yan Benschoten, and had: 1. Peter Y. B., mar- ried Eliza DuBois, died April 21, 1875, in his 76th year; 2. Caroline, married James E. Slater; 3. Dr. Gilbert S., born April 11, 1804, died April 30, 1832; A Ann Catharine, bom 1806, died 1833; 5. Amelia, married Wm. D. Weygant, died Dec. 30, 1834; 6. Martha B., died in infancy; 7. Margaret, died young; 8. Matthew Y. B., married Eliza- beth F. Seyiiiour; 9. Jacob Y. B., deceased, married first, Susan Jane Brinckerhoff, and second, a daughter of John Currie; 10. Elizabeth, born 1819, died 1836; 11. Isaac Sebring, married Mary L. Powell. The members of this branch of the family have for many years been among the most substantial citizens of the town, and distinguished alike for their public and private worth. It has not been possible to obtain the descendants of John (3), James (4), and Nehemiah (5), brothers of Samuel (1) and Isaac (2), nor the descendants of the brothers of Caleb, the son of Isaac, Jr. It may be mentioned, however, that Doct. Charles, the- third son of Isaac, Jr., was for many years a physician of high reputation in the the town of Montgomery, where he left descendants. ' Jeremiah (2), son of William of Flushing, died at Bye, Westches- ter county, in 1766. He left a son David (born 1728, died 1806,) who had David, Jr., born Dec. 28, 1755, died Oct. 20, 1835. David Fowler, Jr., better known as Doct. David, was born at Orom Pond, Westches- ter county. He received a liberal education, and was engaged in completing the studies . of hi? profession, in the city of New York, when the war of the Revolution broke out. After the British obtained possession of the city, he accepted the appointment of surgeon in the second regiment of loyalists, and served during the continuance of the struggle. Soon after the war closed he removed to Newburgh where he settled upon lands composing part of the farm, and built the house now occupied by David E. Fowler, on the road lead- ing from Newburgh to Marlborough. Here he continued to reside until about 1828, when he.removed to the village of Newburgh. He was an earnest supporter of St. George’s church, and served in its Vestry several years ; enjoyed a very considerable reputation as a skillful physician, and had an extensive practice; while in his social intercourse his libe- ral and expanded views and varied information were so happily blended with great suavity and affability of manners, hospitality and kindness of heart, as to stamp him a true gen- * Ante p. 325, 326.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 367 tleman of the old school, and made his society widely courted. Doctor Fowler married Elizabeth, daughter of Caleb Merritt, October 9, 1785, and had: 1‘. James, born Jan. 18, 1787, died in infancy; 2. Gilbert Ogden, born Dec. 10,1788, died Dec. 27,1813; 3. Abigail, born Dec. 27,1789, married Samuel Sands Seymour, diejd May 5,1817; 1. Hannah, born May 11,1791,■died March 20, 1792; 5. Martha Elizabeth, born December 11,1792, married Joseph Carpenter, of New Windsor, May 22, 1810, died May 10, 1851. Gilbert Ogden Fowler, the second son of Doct. David, graduated with honor at Columbia College, and subsequently pursued the study of law at Newburgh, with Solomon Sleight. He was licensed to practice in 1810; appointed Mas- ter in Chancery in 1816; Judge of Orange Com- mon Pleas in 1828, and First Judge of that Court (in place of Samuel S. Seward, ) in 1833. In. the autumn of 1833, he was elected to the legislature, and as a member of that body was instrumental in securing the passage of the charter of the Highland Bank, and also of the Delaware and Hudson Railroad. He was elected president of j the Highland Bank, on the organization of that' institution, and occupied that position until hisfj death. He also held several important military commissions; was aid-de-camp to Gen. Leonard Smith in 1813; quarter-master of 34th brigade in 1815; aid-de-camp to the major-general of the second division of infantry in 1816; brig- ade major and inspector in 1818; briga- dier-general 34th brigade in 1826 (elected in 1825); and major-general of 5th brig- ade in 1827. The Highland Courier, of Dec. 30, contained the following para- graph in reference to his death: “Genl. Fowler had been somewhat unwell for several days, but was not considered seriously sick, and was sitting up and conversing cheerfully until about an hour previous to his death.— Genl. Fowler has been for many years a citizen of Newburgh, and has occupied many stations of trust and responsibility. He was equally respected and esteemed in private life, and his death leaves a wide blank in the social circle in this village.” Genl. Fowler married Rachel Ann, daughter of James and Ann Walker, of the city of New York,. Dec. 21, 1812, and left issue: 1. Ann, married Leonard D. Nicoll, has two sons, Gilbert O. F., and Edward; 2. David E., married Jane Ann, daughter of Chancey Belknap, has Isaac W., Chancey B., Edward, and Annie; 3. Isaac Yanderbeck, died Sept. 28, 1869, unmarried; 4. James Walker, married Mary Frances Brown, of New York, had Frederic Culbert, died Jan. 7,1870, and Frances Elizabeth; 5. Elizabeth, unmarried. THE PURDY FAMILY. This family are the descendants of Francis Purdy, of Yorkshire, Eng., who removed to Fairfield, Conn., where he died in 1658, leav- ing two sons, Francis and Joseph, who were born in Yorkshire, and who held commissions from the crown as surveyors. Francis, Jr., left Joseph, the father of David, the father of David and Nathan Purdy, who settled in Newburgh prior to 1763. Joseph, the second son of Francis of Fairfield, married Elizabeth Ogden and had: 1. Samuel; 2. John; 3. Francis; 4. Daniel; 5. Joseph. (1) Samuel married Charlotte Strang and had: 1. Glorianna, mar-368 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. ried George Mejritt, Senr. ;* * * § 2. Samuel, married Winifred Griffing and had Samuel, Henry, Jacob, Gabriel, and Lavina who married Captain Eleazer Gidney; 3. Caleb, married Hannah Brown and had Caleb, Samuel, Josiah, Andrew, Nehemiah, Sylvanus, Elias, Caroline, Hannah, Lavina, and Anna; 4. Gabriel, married Bethia Miller and had James, Gabriel, Anthony, Glorianna, Lewis, Henry, and Bethia; 5. Charlotte, married Samuel Fowler, Senr.;f 6. Henry, married Mary Foster, granddaughter of Major Paulding, and had Elizabeth, Wil- liam, Anna, Henry, and Samuel who was born in Yorktown, 1751, died in Newburgh, 1836, married Charlotte, daughter of Abel Flew- welling, and had Henry, Abigail, Elizabeth, Mary, Anna, Esther, Mar- tha, and Abel Guilford; 7. Elizabeth, married Josiah Fowler and had Glorianna, Gabriel, Esther, and Martha; 8. Josiah, married Charity Wetmore and had Seth, Alathea, Anna, and Esther. (2) John had three sons, Elisha, Joseph, and Nathaniel. (3) Francis had a son David, and three daughters, viz: Abigail, who married Nehemiah Fowler; Elizabeth, who married Arthur Smith; and Martha, who married Caleb Merritt. He died in Newburgh, June 2, 1760, aged 63 years. (4) David had Isaiah, Nathan, David, Gilbert, Samuel, Josiah, Martha who married Daniel Denton, and Lavina who married Bobert Denton. ■The birdsall family. Benjamin and Daniel Birdsall were brothers, and removed from Long Island to Newburgh sometime about 1768. They were inti- mately associated with the early history of the town, and their names frequently occur in the pages of this work. Benjamin married Mary, daughter of Daniel Tooker,J and had: 1. Margaret, m. John Salmon, Sept. 2, 1785; 2. Samuel; 3. Martha, m. Capt. Edmund Griswold, Feb. 2, 1792; 4. Hannah, m. first, David Sinsabaugh, and second, Jonathan D. Ferris; 5. Charles, m. Amelia Belknap, May 2, 1802; 6. Mary, m. Gilbert Cooper; 7. Cornelia, m. Capt. Apollos Howell; 8. Asa, lost at sea; 9. Benjamin. Daniel married Tamar, daughter of Capt. Joseph Coleman,§ and had: 1. Hannah, m. Isaac Hasbrouck; 2. Mercy, m. first, Col. Thomas Palmer, distinguished in local Bevolu- tionary history, || and second, John Boice, grandfather of the late * See sketch of Merritt family. f See sketch of Fowler family. X The Tooker family were the descendants of Charles Tooker, who came from Long Island with the Birdsalls, and who had: 1. Reuben, married Martha,.daughter of Sami. Fowler, Senr.; 2. Daniel; 3. Mary, married Benjamin Birdsall; 4. Hannah,married Col. Leonard Smith; 5. Martha, married Isaac Fowler, Jr.; 6. Ruth, married Genl. Nathaniel DuBois. § Joseph Coleman came from Nantucket in 1774. His children, by his wife Eunice, were: Tamar, married Daniel Birdsall; Janet, married a Mr. Watts ; Elizabeth, married Isaac Belknap; Polly, married Chan cey Griswold. (Ante p. 171.) || Col. Palmer was a member of the Provincial Convention of N. Y. 1775-’76; member of Assembly 1779-80; Senator 1782-’84; colonel of Minute Men; chairman of Committee of Safety, etc. (Ante p. 135,141, 171.)390 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Eliza, Sarah, John C., Achsah, and Isabella. His second wife, a daughter of Washington Wood, was without issue. 4. Isabella, married Robert Wilson; died in 1821. 5. Anna Jane, married John Forsyth; died in 1852. 6. Edward, died in 1820. Chichester Brown (1) received a liberal education, and entered active life as a teacher of Latin and Greek in the Newburgh Academy; he subsequently stood at the head of a large classical school in Albany. The profession of teaching, however, he soon relinquished for that of physician, and commenced his studies under Doct. Graham, of Shawangunh, (grandfather of Hon. James G. Graham,) an eminent physician and surgeon. In 1808 or ’9, he entered practice in the western part of the town of Newburgh; and in. 1812 or ’18, removed to the village, where he continued to reside until his death. He was one of the most devoted physicians that ever practiced in Newburgh. No hardship was too great for him to encounter, and the voice of suffering always found him ready at its call. Espe- cially was he kind and attentive to the poor. The wealthy he knew could command attend- ance and comfort, and that the poor were too frequently permitted to suffer and die with- out a thought for their condition. This evil he labored to correct; and in his mission of good never paused to inquire into the pecuniary circumstances of his patient. He fell a martyr to this noble trait in his character—contracted disease in the humble cabin of the immigrant, and after a short illness, rested from his labors. If it be true that ----------All our actions take Their hues from, the complexion of the heart,” then is his memory justly cherished. * He was, in some respects, what would be called eccentric; but his face half shrouded in green spectacles, a fan, an umbrella, and a cane, his usual costume in the street; and the silver drinking cup which he carried in his pocket, lest through its absence at any time he should take more of refreshing beverages than would be conducive to his good, are all pleasant pictures in the history of his useful life. His son, George, was a practicing physician and had many of his father’s traits of character. His son, John James, was for many years principal of the Newburgh Institute. PHINEAS BOWMAN. Among the lawyers who took up their resi- dence in Newburgh at an early period, was Phineas Bowman. He had served in a Mas- sachusetts regiment in the war of the Revo- lution, and attained the rank of captain, but ^ was usually addressed by the title of colonel. || He came here with the army, and either re- mained here after its disbandment, as was the case with several of his contemporaries in the service, or returned here not long subsequent to that event. He was a man of good legal attainments; was admit- ted to practice in the courts of Ulster county in 1790; rose rapidly in his profession, and rendered his constituents valuable service, as a member of the legislature in 1798, by securing a law erecting the pres- ent county of Orange. During the last few years of his life, however, he lost his character and his fortune by habits of intemperance; and his memory is now preserved only through the medium of anecdotes, some of them of doubtful authenticity, arising from occurrences inBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 391 which lie is said to have been a principal participant, but which are also claimed as incidents in the life of Judge Baker. He owned the property subsequently purchased by the late William Boe, on Mont- gomery street. His residence, however, was taken down by Mr. Boe, and removed to the south-west corner of Montgomery and Third streets. He left one daughter, Mary, who married Benj. Anderson, a student in her father’s office. His wife, Mary, died March 22, 1813, universally esteemed by all who enj oyed her acquaintance. * JONATHAN FISK. Jonathan Fisk, the most distinguished of the early lawyers of New- burgh, was born at Amherst, N. H., Sept. 26, 1773. He was the son of Jonathan Fisk who subsequently resided at Williamstown, Yt., and became a member of the legislature of that statej and judge of pro- bate, as well as the founder of that branch of the family of which the late James Fisk, of Erie railroad fame, was a member. Jonathan Fisk, Senr., was the son of Major-general John Fisk, of Salem; who was the son of Bev. Samuel Fisk, of Salem; who was the son of Bev. Moses Fisk, of Braintree; who was the youngest son of Bev. John Fisk, who came to Salem in 1637, settled at Wenham, afterwards removed to Chelmsford, Mass., and died in his charge in 1676.f Jonathan Fisk, the subject of this sketch, left the home of his father at the age of 19 years, and commenced the occupation of school teacher, qualified, according to a letter of rec- ommendation signed by Moses Bradford, Dec. 12,1792, to teach “ writing, English grammar, and arithmetic.” We next find him at Ware, N. H., in 1795, with a certificate stating that he had lived for several months in the family of Amos Wood, of that place, where he had “read Greek and Latin, and attended to other branches of study, by which he appeared well- qualified to teach a school;” and that he ‘ maintained a good moral character.” In 1796 or ’97, he entered the office of Peter Hawes, in New York, and commenced the study of law. He was without other means of support than such as his own industry could furnish, but he was enabled to complete his studies by occasional remuneration for services as an amanuensis, and by giving instruc- tion to a class of young men in the evening. In 1799, he was admitted to practice in the court of Common Pleas of Westchester county; in 1800, in the Supreme Court of the state, and during the same year, in the courts of Common Pleas of the counties of Orange and Ulster. In 1802, he was examined by Chief Justice Morgan Lewis, and “regularly admitted as a Counsellor of Law, in all the courts of the State of New York.” Mr. Fisk * Ante p. 180,381. The engraving given in connection with this sketch is from a profile likeness taken in 1798, while Mr. Bowman was a member of the legislature. t This genealogical statement is from a memorandum found among Mr. Fisk’s papers.— The family is presumed to have descended froip Robert and Sybil Fiske of Suffolk co., Eng.392 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. removed to Newburgh, Feb. 4, 1800. In 1809, he was elected representative in Congress from the Ylth District, which was composed of the counties of Orange and Westchester; and again in 1814.* Parties were then known by the titles of democrats and federalists. Mr. Fisk was a democrat and an ardent supporter of the administrations of Jefferson and of Madison. While in Congress, he sustained the war of 1812; opposed the recharter of the Bank of the United States;f proposed a plan for a national printing office, and during his whole career he commanded the confidence of his friends and the respect of his opponents. In 1815 (March 21), he was appointed by President Madison, attorney for the United States in and for the Southern District of New York, and this appointment was renewed Jan. 6,1816. Here he was very dilligent and efficient in prosecuting those who evaded.the law in regard to the sale of foreign merchandise without a license, and so exasperated did this class of offenders become that they threatened him with personal punishment. Fail- ing to intimidate him, they appealed to congress on a question of fees, for the purpose of securing his removal from office. The subject was referred to the Committee on the Ju- diciary, who reported that while Mr. Fisk’s fees had been large, and in some instances un- sustained by law, he had nevertheless been governed by the usage of the former incuni- bents of the office; and the subject died “ on the table.” He remained undisturbed until the expiration of Madison’s administration, in 1820, when his successor was appointed. As a citizen, Mr. Fisk was highly esteemed. The town records, the files of our public journals, and his own manuscripts, bear testimony to the commanding position which he occupied, and to the superiority of his abilities. The most important legal cases were submitted to his care; v'hile on the various local questions of the times, his views received the highest consideration. In 1803 or ’4, he married Sarah Yan Kleeck, of Poughkeepsie, and soon afterwards erected the mansion recently occupied by Charles Halstead, Senr., deceased, in Colden street, where he resided until his appointment as District Attorney, when he removed to New York. At the expiration of his official term, he returned to Newburgh, and purchased the farm lately owned and occupied by Lynde Belknap, where he resided until his death. In person, Mr. Fisk-was large and of a presence that impressed all with whom he had intercourse with a sense of his superiority— - “ A combination, and a form indeed, Where every God did seem to set his seal, To give the world assurance of a man!” His wife was a lady of more than ordinary personal attractions, lively, witty, and not with- out fair literary abilities. His family record is as follows: Jonathan Fisk, born Sept. 26, 1773; died July 13,1832. Sarah Yan Kleeck, wife of Jonathan Fisk, born March 18, 1773; died June 6, 1832. Children: Theodore S., found dead in the street in New York in 1854 or ’55; James L., died at Pensacola in 1835; Delaphine R. E., married J. C. Bisbee, died July 22,1846; Mary M. , died June 8, 1822; and an infant son who died at the age of two months. JONAS STOREY. Jonas Storey was born in Norwich, Conn., July 11th 1778. He early manifested a strong desire for the legal profession, and notwith- standing the opposition of his father, was enabled by his own exer- tions to enter William’s college, where he graduated with honor. While reading law he was at the same time an instructor in the Poughkeepsie Academy. He was admitted to the bar in 1802, soon * Mr. Fisk’s opponent, in 1808, was R. Hatfield. The vote in Newburgh was: Fisk, 298; Hatfield, 27; and in the county, he had 483 majority. In 1814, the vote in Newburgh stood: Fisk, 324; Storey, 97. In the county, Fisk received 2345 votes, and Storey 660. t It should, perhaps, be stated, that Mr. Fisk opposed the recharter of the bank in the form which the bill prescribed. His speech oh this subject was delivered Jan. 18, 1811, and incurred the displeasure of the eccentric John Randolph, who replied to it in his usual sarcastic manner. Fisk rejoined and handled his opponent with such force that be won from him a tribute of respect and secured his friendship.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 398 after lie removed to Newburgh, where he maintained for forty years a distinguished place among the members of his profession. Mr. Storey was one of those old fashioned jurists who regarded law as a science; he was ever searching for its principles, but he was none the less skillful in their practical application. With the best of the old English classics he was familiar. He was also exceedingly fond of metaphysical studies, and this tendency of his mind, perhaps, led him to spend too much time speculating about the more abstruse points of Christian doctrine. So extended were his studies in this direction that he might be properly called a theologian as well as a lawyer. He took a prominent part in the discussions on the subject of religion, which prevailed here at the commencement of the present century. He had probably heard more sermons preached than any other man of his age in the village; and he retained for years the outline of any that had particularly interested him. Mr. Storey held the office of Justice of the Peace for several years, and his prompt and even handed administration of the law made his court a terror to evil doers. He was a candid man, and sometimes gave utterances to his thoughts with a freedom which bordered upon bluntness; but beneath this manner there was a heart full of kindly sympathies. He retired from the active duties of his profession a few years previous to his death, but the change was disastrous; his mind, released from its long routine of toil, appeared to turn inward upon itself, and reason forsook its throne. He died Sept. 22, 1848, in the 77th year of his age. Mr. Storey married (Oct 18,1804), Mary, daughter of Isaac Schultz, of New Windsor, and had: 1. Henry E., who married Rebecca Cook, is now deceased; 2. Edwin,who married Abbey Basset Clark, is now deceased; 3. Helen E., who married Orville M. Smith, is now deceas- ed; 4. Mary B., who married Daniel Smith; 5. Nathan S., who mar- ried Harriet Smith, is now deceased. THE SCHULTZ FAMILY. Christian Otto Schultz was bom Jan. 22d, 1712, at Bredenfelt, in the dukedom of Mecklenburgh, Germany; and his wife, Margaret Sharpenstien, was born in April, 1713, at Sagendorp, Germany. They emigrated to America in 1735; settled at Fishkill, Duchess county, and had: Anna, Abraham, Isaac, Christopher, Margaret,* Christian, Frederick, Peter, William, Jacob, and John. These children were the founders of the different families of the name in Duchess and Orange counties. Those in Orange county are the descendants of Isaac, born * Margaret married Richard Scliell, and was the grandmother of the present Augustus and Richard Schell of New York.394 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. July 28, 1740, arid of his wife, Mary Kilbome, whom he married in 1765. He followed the occupation of school-teacher for some years; subsequently, having saved a small sum of money, he opened a store in New Windsor, and soon became comparatively wealthy. He after- wards established what was long known as Schultz’s mill, near the mouth of Quassaick creek. He died May 25th, 1802, from injuries re- ceived in falling through a trap-door in his mill. His wife died June 9th, 1811. His children were; Sarah, Elizabeth, Abraham, Peggy, Jacob, Susanna, Joanna, Mary, Deborah, Abigail, and Isaac. Abra- ham succeeded his father in the store at New Windsor, and carried on the forwarding business. * Isaac became heir to the mill. Mary mar- ried Jonas Storey of Newburgh. Jacob Schultz, the second son of Isaac (1), was bom April 23, 1776, and married, Feb. 14,1799, Anna, daughter of John Denniston, of New Windsor. His first appearance in business was as the editor and proprietor of the New Windsor Gazette, the publication and character of which has been noticed in previous pages. In 1810, he opened a dry goods and grocery store in Newburgh, in company with Andrew DeWitt, and was engaged in this trade until 1814, when he purchased from his brother, Isaac, the old mill of his father; but afterwards sold it to Peter Townsend, came back to Newburgh and entered business in company with George Betts. He retired, in 1818, to a small farm in the town of New Windsor, erected a substantial stone house, and in the quiet independence of agri- cultural pursuits spent the remainder of his life. He died in 1859. His children were : 1. John D., married Sophia Marsh, of New York, and had fifteen children ; 2. Fanny W., married John Latham ; 3. Mary Ann, married Thos. J. Fulton, of New Windsor; 4. Cath- arine M.; 5. Jacob K., married Helen J. Howser. JOHN FORSYTH. John Forsyth was born near the city of Aberdeen in Scotland, in 1786 or ’87. His parents were in comfortable circumstances, but the death of his father in the meridian of life, and the subsequent mis- conduct of some persons with whom he had been associated in busi- ness, left his widowed mother with a family of young children, for a time in a straightened condition. Her son was sent to the grammar school of Aberdeen, where he had for a school-mate the famous Lord Byron, but from the cause before mentioned he was deprived of these educational advantages sooner than he otherwise would have been. Mr. Forsyth came to this country in 1805, intending to proceed to North Carolina or Georgia, in both of which states some branches of his father’s family were settled. But by the advice of Prof. Kemp* of Columbia College, to whom he had a letter of introduction, and Mr. Robert Gosman, he was induced to remain in the north; He came to Newburgh in 1810, simply to visit the Rev. Mr. Scrimgeour, pastor of the Associate Reformed church, and an old friend of his mother, but * Abrabam Schultz married Sarah Smith Howell, of Blagg’s Clove, and had ten children six of whom died young. Those surviving were: 1. Abraham H., a physician in Florida, Orange county; 2. Fanny H., married William S. Woodhull; 3. Joanna, married Doctor Robert Sloan; 4. Mary K., married Isaac S. White, son of Judge Nathap White. He died at New Windsor, May 18, 1830.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 395 with no intention of remaining here. Here, however, he was induced to settle, and here he spent much the largest portion of his life. He soon found employment, and until 1825 was largely engaged in busi- ness as a builder; In the year just named he became a partner in the firm of Law, Bevridge & Go.—afterwards and more widely known as J. Bevridge & Co.—in which he continued until his death in 1854. Mr. Forsyth was a man of singularly robust frame, and for many years his life was one of great activity. He was a man of presence,— one of those whose face and form would arrest the attention of a stranger, and his mental and moral qualities were accordant with the impression thus made. He was a wise counselor, and there were few men whose advice was more sought by persons of all classes; and none who knew him could doubt his unbending rectitude, his large heart- edness, or his rare sagacity. He was for years a director in the Bank of Newburgh, and a trustee of the Academy. He had a good deal to do with the establishment of the Newburgh Steam Mills—of which company he was president—and of the Branch railroad. Indeed to every public improvement he was ready to lend a helping hand. From early manhood, Mr. Forsyth was an exemplary Christian, and was long a ruling elder in the Associate Reformed church. Catholic in spirit, he was yet warmly attached to his own denomination, and was widely known in it as one of its most zealous and generous mem- bers. He was twice married, viz: 1. To Jane, oldest daughter of John Currie, who settled in Newburgh in 1802; 2. To Anna Jane, youngest daughter of John Brown. His children (there were none by the second marriage) were: 1. John, 2. Robert A., 3. James C. THE CRAWFORD FAMILY. There are several branches of the Crawford family in this country, all of Irish origin, and all more or less remotely connected. The Newburgh family of that name, are the descendants of James Craw- ford, who came to America in 1718. He settled at Litfcle Britain, in this county, soon after the Clinton immigrants located there. His children were: David, who succeeded to the homestead farm, and had Francis, for many years a resident of Newburgh; Mary, who married John Van Arsdale; Jane, who married James Denniston; and James, who settled in what is now the town of Crawford.* Francis Crawford, oldest son of David, remained on the home- stead at Little Britain until 1806, when he removed to Newburgh and entered into the mercantile and freighting business with John Harris. He retired from the trade * Riker’s Annals of Newtown, 307. Eager’s Orange County, 271, 332.896 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH in 1810, but reentered it in 1817, and continued in it until his death, 23d of April, 1829, in the 67th year of his age. “There were traits in his character well deserving notice and imitation. From the uniform tenor of his conduct through life, it is believed that he lived and died without a single personal enemy. Blessed with a natural temper almost peculiar to himself—an utter stranger to petulance, passion, and the inordinate love of gain, he was the same man under all circumstances; no one was ever wounded by his tongue, or made the victim of his avarice. He received the bounties of Providence as they were bestowed, and reaped the benefits of his prudence and industry, and thereby secured to himself and to his associates in business, the universal confidence of the public, and the esteem and admiration of innumerable friends. In short, he lived as a man should live, in relation to his fellow-man; and he died as a man should die, in relation to his God and his Redeemer. ------—“ ’Tis only noble to be good; Kind hearts are more than coronets, And simple faith than Norman blood.”* Francis Crawford was thrice married—first, to Eunice Watkins, by whom be had: 1. Samuel; 2. Thomas; 3. David; 4. James. Mrs. Eunice Crawford died in 1791, in her 28th year. Second, to Lydia, daughter of Jeduthan Belknap, Dec. 1, 1792. Third, to Fanny Den- niston (widow of Capt. Isaacs), bom Jan. 20, 1780, died Feb. 26, 1829.* His sons, David and James, came to Newburgh with him in 1806, and were his associates in his business until 1810. James after- wards opened the Mansion House, of which he was for several years the proprietor. He married Elizabeth Munson, who, after his death married John Farnam. David continued with, his father, and at his death received the principal portion of his estate. David Crawford was born at Little Britain, about the year 1788,—the precise date cannot now be ascertained, in consequence of the destruction of the family records by fire. He received such . educational advantages as the country schools at that time afforded, and, in 1806, entered the store of his father as clerk. In 1810, he was appointed deputy sheriff of Orange county, and discharged the duties of that office for about one year. When the war of 1812 broke out, he promptly responded to the call of congress for volunteers; and raised a company of. artillery, of which he was elected captain, in which capacity lie served for about one year, when he received a commission ip the army of the United States, and remained in the. service until the close of the war in 1815. He reentered the mercantile and forwading business with his father in 1817, and prosecuted it until 1851. He died July 23,1856. As a citizen, Mr. Crawford was highly esteemed, and for several years held positions of honor and trust. His integrity was undoubted, and throughout his long business career his reputation was unsullied. Always ready to lend a helping hand to others, there are those among our citizens who can look back with grateful remembrance to the kindly aid which he rendered to them when assistance was needed. In his business and social inter- course he was especially affable and agreeable; the sun-light of a perpetually happy dis- position appeared to be his. The Yorick of a thousand jests, his genial humor was irresis- tible, and would chase the clouds away from the gravest face. He was unusually well- informed in dramatic literature. At one time in his life he had a decided passion for this * Newburgh Telegraph, April 23,1829.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 397 kind of reading. With the plays of Shakspeare he was very familiar, and could recall their scenes, characters, and many of their choice passages, at will. His love for children was another characteristic; he delighted in their presence, sympathized in their amuse- ments, and always seemed to enter into the spirit of their frolics. In a word, he was a patriotic, honest, kind-hearted gentleman, and an excellent citizen. David Crawford married Fanny C., daughter of Isaac Belknap, May 15, 1822, and had: 1. Isaac B. (died young); 2, Mary Elizabeth, married Sands McCamly, Aug. 6, 1844, died July 8, 1845, leaving Mary E. C. McCamly; 3. James Thomas (died young) ; 4. Anna (now deceased), married Bichard A. Southwick, Oct. 11, 1849, had Fanny C., Anna 0., and Florence. THE MAILLER FAMILY. John Mailler, or Mailard, the ancestor of this family, emigrated from Scotland soon after the Bevolution; he resided for a few years in New York and in Westchester county, and then settled perma- nently in the town of Cornwall, Orange County. His children were James, George, John, William, Bartholomew, Jane, Mary, and Sarah. Bartholomew married Julia, daughter of Samuel Ketcham, of Corn- wall, and had one child, William Ketcham Mailler. William K. Mailler was bom in the town of Cornwall, Aug. 17,1805. At the age of 18 years, he came to Newburgh and entered the service of Francis Crawford & Co. His busi- ness habits and sound judgment soon render- ed him a desirable acquisition to the firm and, in 1827, he became one of its members under the title of F. & D. Crawford & Co. From that time until 1864, he remained a principal in the forwarding trade, and shared largely in the fluctuations to which it was subjected. In pri- vate as well as in public life, Mr. Mailler was plain and unassuming. Liberal in his chari- ties, kind in the discharge of his parental du- ties, and cheerful in the social circle, he left an example worthy of imitation. He died in 1864. Mr. Mailler married Hannah P., daugh- ter of Jacob Oakley, of Coldenham, June 1, 1830, and had twelve children, all of whom died in infancy except William 0., born May 26, 1831, married (1859) Antoinette W. Conk- ling; Mary Hannah, born Nov. 27, 1834, married Moses Cook Belknap, June 16,1857, died May 31,1858; and John D., born June 9, 1845. OAKLEY FAMILY. Samuel Oakley, the immediate ancestor of the Newburgh family of that name, was a native of Huntington, L. I. He removed to Orange county about 1786, and settled at Goshen, where he married Abigail, daughter of Timothy Wood; and, after her death, Bebecca Balph. His children were: 1. Timothy; 2. Jacob; 3. Bichard; 4, Moses; 5.398 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. Solomon; 6. Aaron; 7. Abigail; 8. Keziah; 9. Patience; 10. Susanna; 11. Phebe; 12. Hannah; 13. Jesse. Jacob (1) married Susanna, daughter of Daniel Haines, of Montgomery, and settled at Colden- ham, where he pursued the occupation of a tanner and currier, as well as that of farmer. His children were: 1. Jackson, who married Abigail Logan; 2. William C., who married Phebe Carman; 3. David H., who married Phebe Baxter; 4. Abigail W., who married John McClelland; 5. Jacob, who married Sarah J. Austin; 6. Hannah P., who married William K. Mailler; 7. Kichard, who diedUnmarried; 8. Samuel, who married Emily Williams; 9. Zophar; 10. Susan, who married John Dales —of whom Jackson (1) was for several years of the firm of Oakley & Davis in the mercantile and forwarding trade at the foot of Fourth street. Samuel (8) was also in mercantile business. Through its male as well as its female branches the family has had honorable rep- resentation in the history of Newburgh for nearly half a century. THE DOWNING FAMILY. Samuel Downing, the founder of the Newburgh family of that name, was of English ancestry. He was born in the year 1761; learned the trade of carriage-maker, and removed from Cambridge, Mass., to New- burgh, and from thence to Montgomery, intending to pursue his avo- cation there. Failing in securing a satisfactory place of settlement in Montgomery, he returned to Newburgh, where he established, on the north-east corner of Broad and Liberty streets, about the commence- ment of the present century, a shop for the manufacture of wagons and carriages.* While yet in the early stages of this undertaking, failing health led him to engage in the more healthful business of market gardening and nursery, which he planted on the property ad- joining his shop. As early as 1810, he offered for sale trees engrafted and innoculated, including apples, pears, peaches, apricots, cherries, etc. Although not the first to engage in this avocation in the present county of Orange,f he was the first to conduct it so successfully as to secure its continuance. He died Nov. 1, 1822, aged 61 years; and his wife, Eunice, died October 29, 1838, aged 65 years. He had five chil- dren, viz: 1. Emily, born Jan. 24, 1801, married Sylvester Ferry, died March 11, 1864, had four children—Frances Emily (married Lewis W. Gardiner), George J., John Milton, and Edward; 2. Charles, born July 9, 1802, married Mary Wait; 3. George W., born Feb. 22, 1804, * Ante p. 269. f John Conkling established the first nursery of record, at Bethlehem, (Cornwall), in 1794. It was afterwards continued by Noah Townsend (1803). The following advertise- ment of the former is from the Goshen Repository: “ John Conkling, four miles from New Windsor landing, on the Goshen road, has several thousand apple trees in his nursery for sale, now large enough for planting. * * Those who wish to have any of the above trees may inquire for David Conkling, who will give good attendance. Sept. 12,1794.”BIO GRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 399 died April 5, 1846, married Antoinette Starr and had three children— Charles, Oliver Starr, and Mary M.; 4. Fanny, died in infancy; 5. Andrew J., horn Oct. 31, 1815, married Caroline E. DeWint, June 7, 1838, died without issue July 28, 1852. Chables Downing (2) and Andbew J. Downing (5) succeeded their father, and to them more than to any other persons is due the changing and renewing of the whole system of fruits not only in this part of the country, but throughout the nation. While drawing much of his practical knowledge from his brother, Andrew J. Downing may be regarded as the father of American landscape gardening. His first literary work, “Landscape Gardening,” gave him rank among the most distinguished writers of the age, and in his subsequent “Cottage Residences,” “Architecture of Country Homes,” and “Fruit and Fruit Trees Of America,” as well as in the “ Horticulturist,” of which he was the editor, he secured a reputation which was not confined to the country of his nativity. “The results of his toil,” says his biographer, “ appear in the forests which he preserved from the merciless axe—in the trees which he described and made contribute more abundantly to the taste and comfort of their proprietors—in the avenues which he adorned—in the lawns and pleasure grounds which he laid out and embellished, and in numberless buildings which stand as monuments to his architectural skill.” No more fitting memorial of his life-work could be written than the sentence from his own pen : “ Angry volumes of politics have we written none, but only peaceful books, humbly aiming to weave something more into the fair garland of the beautiful and useful that encircles this excellent old Earth.” His useful life ended in the burning of the steamer Henry Clay near Yonkers, July 28,1852. Charles Downing continued the nursery business until 1856, though not as the successor of kis brother, whose nursery passed into the hands of Andrew Saul.* THE LUDLOW FAMILY. The record of the Ludlow family of Newburgh dates back to Wm. Ludlow, a gentleman of the reign of Edward the Third (1350). After intermediate descendants: (2) William Ludlow; (3) George Ludlow; (4) Sir Edmund Ludlow; (6) Edmund Ludlow, the regicide; and from the latter branch: (7) Gabriel Ludlow; (8) - Gabriel Ludlow; (9) Gabriel Ludlow; (10) Gabriel Ludlow; (11) Gabriel Ludlow; (12) Kobert Ludlow. The family was dispersed under the reign of Cromwell. Edmund Ludlow was active in effecting the overthrow of the first Charles; was one of the judges who sentenced that sovereign to death,f and acquired high renown as a soldier and orator in the civil struggle of that period. He opposed, however, the aspirations of Cromwell to the protectorate; and failing in this, was compelled to submit to virtual banishment, and took up his residence at Vevay, in Switzerland, where he died in 1693. Gabriel Ludlow, his son, arrived in New York in 1694, and married, in 1697, Sarah Hanmer, * After retiring from the nursery business, Charles continued the investigation of fruits by obtaining trees and grafts of new varieties, to prove their nomenclature, quality, etc., until the past few years, when he sold his experimental grounds, but still continued his interest in Pomology. In the meantime he.has twice revised his brother’s work on Fruit and Fruit Trees, first in 1867 and again in 1869. Since the last revision he has added two Appendixes, containing new fruits, corrections, etc., making the whole work twice the original size. f This act gained for the judges the title of regicides. After the restoration of Charles n, several of these judges were arrested and suffered death, while others fled for safety. Goffe, Whaley, and Dixwell, came to America and secreted themselves at New Haven, Ct., where they subsequently died.400 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH daughter of the first Episcopal clergyman of that city, and a lineal descendant from Sir David Hanmer, one of the justices of the court of the king’s bench in the reign of Edward II. Gabriel Ludlow, his son, was born in New York and there married Elizabeth Cromeline, daughter of Daniel Cromeline, one of the proprietors of the Wawa- yanda patent. Their son was Robert Ludlow. Robert Ludlow married Elizabeth Conkling. He removed from New York to the town of Warwick, on the Wawayanda patent, and after spending a few years there, became a resident of Newburgh in 1796. It was his intention to open here a mercantile business, and for that purpose erected a store; but before his plans were matured he fell a victim to consumption (Oct. 2,1798,) in the vigorous years of manhood. He left children : 1. Charles, 2. Robert C., 3. Augustus C., 4. Mary, 5. Nancy, 6. Betsey, and 7. Francis. His wife, Elizabeth, married second Robert W. Jones, and had one son, Lieut. Robt. W. Jones of the U. S. navy—died in 1857. She died July 21,1829. Charles Ludlow (1), the oldest son of Robert Ludlow, was enrolled a midshipman of the U. S. navy in May, 1795, and passed through the different grades of his profession with honor until he attained the rank of captain, when, in consequence of the advancement of an officer of lower grade over him, he resigned his commission and retired to private life. He married (Aug. 5, 1811,) Margaret Thornton Mackaness, and settled in the town of New Windsor, where he died leaving one daughter, now Mrs. Thos. W. Chrystie. Robert C. Ludlow (2), the second son, was born‘in Warwick in 1787. He was engaged for some years in mercantile pursuits in New York, but the yellow fever robbed him of his senior partner, and the house was broken up. The country was engaged at that time in the second war with Great Britain, and he applied for and obtained the post of purser in the navy. It was his good fortune to be associated with* his personal friend Captain Bainbridge, on board of the frigate Constitution, and to participate in the brilliant action, the capture of the British frigate Java. He remained in the navy until his death in 1826. He married a Miss Wethered, of South Carolina, and had William B., Augustus, Robert C., and Mary, all of whom are now dead except the latter, who married a Carroll, of Balti- more, where she now resides. Augustus C. Ludlow (3), the third son of Robert Ludlow, was born in 1792, and entered the United States navy in 1804, as midshipman, under the immediate guardian- ship of his senior brother Charles, and cruised in the Mediterranean for three years on board the frigate President, under command of Commodore S. Barron. Ho was subse- quently transferred to the Constitution, where he was raised to the post of lieutenant. From the Constitution he was transferred to the Hornet; and from the latter vessel to the Chesapeake, where he was raised to the post of first lieutenant under Captain Lawrence. The fate of the Chesapeake and her noble captain, was the fate of Lieut. Ludlow. In the early part of the engagement he was severely wounded and carried below; but scarcely had he been removed when Lawrence fell mortally wounded, and as he was borne to the cabin, Ludlow heard his dying command, “ Don’t give up the ship !” and springing from his seat with his wounds half dressed, he rushed on deck and plunged into the thickest of the conflict. The struggle was desperate, but in vain. A sabre cut from one of his foes laid him senseless; and the “ stars and stripes ” were stricken down by the victors’ right. The Chesapeake was taken to Halifax. Here the remains of the gallant Lawrence were buried with military and naval honors. The twice-wounded Ludlow, after being trephined in Halifax, so far rallied on the day of his commander’s funeral, that no solicitations could detain him from rendering the last homage to his friend, and he followed the hearse —a silent, solitary mourner. The effort was too great, and on his return to his room he was seized with a delirious fever which closed his mortal career on the 13th of June, 1813, at the age of 21 years. On learning their fate, the citizens of Salem, Mass., forwarded a flag of truce to Halifax and procured the bodies of Lawrence and Ludlow, and they were removed to that place and from thence to New York where they were consigned to a tomb in Trinity church. At the request of the citizens of Salem, Hon. Justice Storey, of theBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. • 401 Supreme Court of the United States, delivered an eloquent eulogy on the occasion. Re- ferring to Ludlow he said: “He was indeed worthy of the confidence and friendship of Lawrence. His soul was formed for deedB of active valor and martial enterprise. In the mild’ engagements of peace, it softened into the most attractive suavity of manners, and wore the most benignant form of honor. In the tumults of war, it glowed with an ambi- tion for naval excellence, which electrized every movement and awakened the whole en- ergies of his genius.” No merit is claimed for the Ludlows from their long line of noble ancestry; but Ameri- can history bears a record of their services which admits of no denial of their title to the * rank of noble men. —Mary (4), daughter of Robert Ludlow, married Thomas Powell, died Nov. 28, 1867; Ann D., (5), married Benjamin Case; Betsey (6), married David Humphreys, died Jan. 22, 1835; and Frances (7), married Rev. John Brown, D. D., of St. George’s church, New- burgh, died April 18,1872. THE THOMAS POWELL FAMILY. This family descended from Thomas Powell of Wales, Eng., who was one of the purchasers and patentees of Huntington, L. I., in 1664. On the 18th August, 1695, the same gentleman purchased from “ Mawmee, alias Serewanus, William Chepy, and all ye rest of ye Indian proprietors,” for and in consideration of £140, the tract of land whereon the village of Bethpage is now situated.* This Thomas had a son Thomas, who was probably the father of Henry Powell (bom in 1741), the immediate ancestor of the Newburgh branch of the family. Henby Powell inherited a large portion of the estate acquired by his father, which he enjoyed until the British forces obtained possession of Long Island, when he was sub- jected to the tyranny and persecution so mercilessly exercised at that time by the minions of the English government. At the commencement of the struggle for Independence, he took an active part in the cause of his country, and was soon selected as a victim for sac- rifice at the royal altar. Flattery, promises, and threats, were successively employed to secure his influence for the king; and when these failed, his estate was confiscated and his person incarcerated in the. Jersey prison ship, from which he was subsequently removed to the old Sugar House. The sufferings endured by the patriots who were confined in those prisons will never be fully told. Ten thousand persons perished within their walls by starvation, sickness and ill-treatment; and the number of victims would have been largely increased, had not the hand of charity supplied their wants. Among those favored in the latter respect was Mr. Powell, whose release or exchange was subsequently effected. He returned to Long Island, stripped of all earthly wealth except an unblemished name, and succeeded in obtaining a lease of part of Shelter Island, where he resumed the pur- suit of agriculture. Here he remained until 1781, when he gathered together the fruits of his farm and started, accompanied by his son James, on an ordinary sail-ferry-boat, for the New York market. In crossing the channel, a sudden flaw of wind cast the vessel on her beams end, sprinkling the waves with men and horses. Mr. Powell succeeded in mounting one of his horses while in the water, and, after searching in vain for his son, turned his steed towards the shore, but was arrested in his progress by a cry for help, and; turning saw his boy clinging to the prostrate sail and rapidly floating out to sea with the wreck; and in the effort to rescue his offspring, he perished with him. Henry Powell married (1762) Mary Keen, a lady of Irish extrac- * Gov. Andros issued a patent to Thomas Powell, and others, purchasers of Huntington, in 1664. In 1685, Gov. Dongan.issued another patent for part of the same lands, in which Thomas Powell, Jr., is named. In 1695, Thomas Powell, Jr., removed to and was one of the purchasers of Bethpage—Thompson’s L. i, 467, 469, 506. 026402 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. tion, and had: 1. Freelove, who married Jacob Parish and had Henry, Mary, James, Nancy, Daniel, Thomas, Benjamin, Elizabeth, and Martha; 2. Jacob, died unmarried; 3. Thomas; 4. James, drowned; 5. Martha, married Benj. Townsend and had Betsey, Mary, Jacob,* Nancy, and Benjamin; 6. Eliza, who married William Seymour.f Jacob (2) and Thomas (4) Powell, the former 16 years of age and the latter 12, at the time of the death of their father, were alone capable of making any exertions for the sup- port of their widowed mother and her children, and nobly did they struggle for the accom-. plishment of this duty. With that energy which ever after distinguished their career, they grappled manfully with adversity and triumphed. Jacob was placed at the head of his father’s farm, and, assisted by Thomas, and supported by the counsels of a good mother, he succeeded in obtaining a comfortable support for the family until the expiration of the lease. A new home and a new theatre of operations now became necessary. In 1788, in company with their mother, they removed to the county of Orange, and settled near Washingtonville, where their industry led to some increase of property. In 1791, they removed to Marlborough, Ulster county, where they opened a small store, and erected lime kilns, and were again successfully employed. In the spring of 1798, they removed to New York, and engaged in mercantile business, but, being driven away by yellow fever, the succeeding summer, took up their residence in Newburgh at the suggestion of their brother-in-law, Mr. Seymour. Here they engaged in the mercantile and forwarding trade,. the .former on the south-east comer of Water and Third streets and the latter from a wharf immediately east, where they remained until 1818, when they sold to Reeve & Falls. They subsequently opened an office in a building which stood on the site of the present Colon- nade Row, where they conducted business as private bankers. Jacob Powell died in 1823, from a cancer on the face. “In relation to this individual, ” says Mr. Eager, “we have the unbroken voice of' all who knew him, to justify us in saying, that he was not only sagacious and truly philanthropic in the operations of his mind, but upright in his commercial transactions.” He died unmarried, in his 58th year, and his brother, Thomas, succeeded to his estate. Thomas Powell retired from business soon after the death of his brother; but again entered active life in 1833-34, and from that time until his death (May 12, 1856,) he con- tributed largely,—by the enterprises in which he engaged, and those which he fostered and encouraged,—to the prosperity of the village. At a public meeting of citizens held May 19,1856, called to pay a tribute of respect to his memory, the late Hon. John W. Brown remarked: “In a public meeting of his neighbors and townsmen, it were idle to speak of his public spirit, and the uses he made of his wealth during the last twenty-five years of his life. How he applied it, and what, he did with it, is fresh in the recollection of us all. It is sufficient to say, that whatever measure of activity pervades our public streets, our workshops, our wharves and places of business, we owe to the prompt and intelligent interposition of Mr. Powell’s wealth and credit between us and the legitimate results of great public improvements which threatened to dry up the sources of our pros- perity, and divert the streams of our business into other channels. He was not alone in his exertions to arrest the downward tendency of our prosperity. There were others, and especially one other, whose efforts were conspicuous in the same emergency, and to whom the citizens of Newburgh owe a debt of gratitude which it will be difficult to pay.” The reference by the speaker was to Mr. Powell’s course, and that of his son-in-law, Mr. Homer Ramsdell, in connection with the construction of the Newburgh branch railroad, already detailed in another part of this work in which the firm of which they were the principals became responsible, through endorsements, acceptances, and advances, for $202,219, and without which the construction of the road would have been indefinitely deferred. His usefulness was not less conspicuous in the organization of the Powell Bank in 1838, and in the establishment of the Newburgh Steam Mills in 1844. It was this use of his capital and credit for the benefit of the community as well as for that of himself, rather than for * Father of George W. Townsend of Newburgh. f Ante p. 377. $ Ante p. 225, 229.403 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. any enterprises which he originated, that will keep his memory green, while that of others will wither under the apostrophe— “ But thou! what hast thou done with all the powers That lavish nature wasted on thy soul?” Mr. Powell married Mary, daughter of Robert Ludlow, and had: 1. Henry T., died in 1834; 2. Robert L., married Louisa A. Orso, and had Frances E. L., now deceased, Mary L. (married Isaac S. Fowler), Henrietta (married Doct. W. A. M. Culbert), and Fanny, now deceased; 3. James A., was drowned in 1828; 4. Jacob, died in 1816 ; 5. Frances E. L., married Homer Ramsdell. THE HOMER RAMSDELL FAMILY. Among the early substantial emigrants from England who settled in Massachusetts were Joseph Ramsdell (or Ramsden) and his wife Martha Bowker, at Plymouth in 1643, and John Stockbridge and his wife Anna, at Scituate in 1638. Their prior history is not known, nor is there record of their pioneer experiences, although it is known that they shared in all the vicissitudes of New England life at that period, and founded families destined to an honorable part in the annals of the communities in which they lived. The descent of the latter is traced for this work from Wm. Stockbridge, and that of the former from his great-grandson, Joseph Ramsdell (2), who married Mary Homer, at Duxbury, Mass., April 23, 1730, and had ten children—of whom Joseph (3) married Elizabeth Barker, Feb. 1,1770. He served as one of the committee of safety of Hanover, Mass., in 1775 and ’76, and was in other respects identified with the Revolution. He died Aug. 5,1817. His son, Joseph (4), bom Sept. 10,1775, married Ruth Stockbridge, daughter of Wm. Stockbridge, of Hanover, Feb. 3,1800, removed to Warren, and had: 1. Joseph, 2. Mary, 8. Homer—of whom Homer Ramsdell (3) was born in Warren, Mass., August 12th, 1810, and was educa- ted at Monson Academy. He entered the dry goods trade in New York in 1832, and con- tinued in that avocation until 1840. In 1844, he became one of the firm of T. Powell & Co., and from that time until the present has continued his connection with the mer- cantile and forwarding business in Newburgh. He was elected a director of the Erie rail- road in 1846, and has held that position since that time, with the exception of the interval elapsing between October, 1857, and October, 1866; . served as president of the company from 1853 to 1857, and in 1876, as receiver. From the date of his association with the firm of T. Powell & Co., until Mr. Powell’s death, he was very largely the administrator of Mr. Powell’s fortune, and to him perhaps the community owe most of the undertakings in which that firm engaged. No public enterprise has for many years been complete without his aid, while those of a private character to which he has been a party have not been limited in number or unproductive of general benefit. The history of Newburgh for over a quarter of a century has been his history; its pathway is studded with mementos of his usefulness. He married Frances E. L., daughter of Thomas Powell, June 16, 1835, and had: 1. Mary L. P., born March 23,1836, died July 29,1841; 2. Frances J. (married Major George W. Rains); 3. Thomas P.; 4. James A. P.; 5. Henry P.; 6. Homer S.; and 7. Leila R. REV. JOHN BROWN, D. D. Rev. John Brown, D. D., was bom in tbe city of New York, May 19th, 1791. He graduated from Columbia college in 1811; studied404 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. 1 under Bishop Hobart and was ordained deacon of the Protestant Episcopal church at St; Paul’s church, New York, in 1812. At the bishop’s request, he went to Trinity church, Fishkill, which had then been without a rector for seventeen years, and reorganized the con- gregation, at the same time holding stated services in Newburgh. In 1815, he was ordained priest by Bishop Hobart, at St. Paul’s, New York, and during the same year removed to Newburgh, having re- ceived and accepted a call to the rectorship of St. George’s church, where he preached his inaugural sermon, Dec. 24th, 1815. He also reorganized St. Thomas’ church, New Windsor; was chosen its rector and held that position, dividing his time between the two parishes, until 1844‘, when he resigned the latter charge. During the earlier years of his rectorship of St. George’s, he performed a large amount of missionary work in this section of country. In this field he or- ganized St. John’s church at Monticello; Grace church at Middle- town, and later the churches at Cornwall and Marlborough. He also revived the church at Goshen, St. Andrew’s at Walden, St. Peter’s at Peekskill, and St. Philip’s at Garrisons, holding services at intervals in those places until the churches were able to support a minister. Few of the pioneer clergy of the district were more zealous or more devoted, and none whose labors have been more satisfactory. The services of Dr. Brown in his own parish are stated in connec- tion with its history in another part of this work. In other fields of local labor he was for many years quite active, and notably so as one of the trustees of the Newburgh academy and subsequently of the free schools, as a member of the Horticultural society, chaplain of the Masonic fraternity, etc. Amid the changes of the many years of his pastorate, he has held the parental affection and respect of his people as well as of the community. He married Frances Elizabeth, daughter of Bobert Ludlow, Nov. 15, 1819. Mrs. Brown lived to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of her wedding; she died April 18, 1872, having had issue six children, viz: Mary, who married Daniel T. Rogers; Margaret T. L., who married George W. Kerr*; Augusta P., who married Moses Ely; Helen; Anna W., who married Eugene A. Brewster f; John Hobart, and Charles W. * George W. Kerr was born at Knowlton Mills (now Paulina) Warren county, N. J., Feb- ruary 15, 1810, and is a lineal descendant of Rev. Walter Kerr of Monmouth, N. J. His parents removed to Ithaca, N. Y., where he entered the Branch Bank of Newburgh, and on its withdrawal in 1831, removed to Newburgh and accepted a clerkship in the Bank of Newburgh. In 1836 he was chosen cashier of that institution, and in 1854 was elected its president, a position in which he was retained under its reorganization in 1864. f Eugene A. Brewster was born in New York city, April 13th, 1827, and removed with his parents to Newburgh when he was three years old. Having qualified himself for that position, he was appointed teacher in the Newburgh High School where he remained two years. In 1843, he entered the office of the late Hon. John W. Brown; was admitted to the bar in 1848, but remained in Judge Brown’s office until 1850, since which time he has occupied a leading position in the profession.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 405 THR HATHAWAY FAMILY. The genealogy of this family is traced from Benjamin Hatheway, as the name was formerly written, who came from Scotland, about 1767, and settled at Morristown, N. J., where he died. His only son, Clemens Hathaway, removed to Newburgh, where he died, Sept. 1801, aged 56 years and 4 months, and where his wife, Hannah, died June 8,1809, aged 56 years and 10 months. Their children were Ebenezer and Josiah. The latter was born Dec. 8, 1771, and married, Aug. 13, T794, Mabel, a sister of Samuel O. Gregory. He followed for a few years the occupation of cabinet-maker, but afterwards engaged in the coasting trade, and commanded the sloop Republican, owned by Geo. Gardner ; was subsequently associated with Caleb Coffin in the same trade, and sailed from New York to Washington, N. C., where he died July 19, 1811. His wife, Mabel, died at Morris Plains, N. J., July 13, 1811. His children were: 1. Rhoda, who died in infancy; 2. Frede- rick A., born April 1st, 1801, married Phebe Stackhouse, and had Frederick A., and Stephen S.; 3. Odell Samuel, born Sept. 1, 1802. Odell S. Hathaway (3) was born in New- burgh, at the residence of his father on the cor- ner of Smith and Fourth streets. Left an orphan : at the age of seven years, he was taken by his uncle, Seth Gregory, of Morristown, N. J., with whom he remained a few years, and attended a common school. He then returned to Newburgh and entered the store of Samuel G. Sneden, as clerk, in which capacity he served until he attain- ed his majority, performing his duties accepta- bly “for and in consideration of his board and clothes. ” After serving his time he was employ- ed by Mr. Sneden until 1824, when he became a partner, and, on the death of Mr. Sneden, in 1836, he succeeded to the entire business. He subsequently served as supervisor of the town for twelve or thirteen years, with the exception of one year, consecutively. In 1869, he was elected member of assembly and filled the position acceptably. For some years prior to 1864, he was a director of the Bank of Newburgh, and in that year was elected president of the Quassaick Bank, serving in that capacity until 1876, when he resigned. Mr. Hathaway married Helen Maria, daughter of Charles Birdsall, Sept. 27, 1827, and had: 1. Amelia M., wlio married Nathaniel B. Hayt; 2. Harriet A., who married Edward H. Tomlinson; 3. Josiah A., married Julia Darusha, died March 23,1864, aged 32 years; 4. William M., who married Sophia Blake, served as adjutant of 19th militia and 168th volunteers in the war of the rebellion, died Feb. 3,1871, aged 37 years; 5. Sarah S., mar- ried James E. Horton; 6. Odell S., married Susan F. Bradner; 7. Charles C.; 8. Hiram F.; 9. Helen M., married Edward Low, died Sept. 19,1875; 10. Edward M. THE FARRINGTON FAMILY. Edmund Farrington, the ancestor of the Newburgh family of that name, emigrated from Southampton, Eng., and settled in Lynn, Mass., sometime prior to 1640; from thence he removed with others to Cow Bay, L. I., where a settlement was commenced but soon after broken406 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. up by the Dutch governor of New Netherland. He then returned to Lynn, and (1655) built a mill there, and dug a pond and opened a brook for a half mile, called Farrington brook. He died in 1680, aged 88 years. His sons, Thomas and Edmund, removed to Flush- ing, L. I., from whence Thomas removed to Westchester county, where he has descendants. His oldest son remained in Lynn, and was the grandfather of Daniel Farrington, born in Lynn in 1765, and died in Newburgh in 1813, in his 48th year, leaving issue by his wife, Rachel Ward (died in New York in 1864, aged 97 years): 1. Sarah; 2. Daniel; 3. Ebenezer Ward; 4. Ezra; 5. Susan; 6. Mary; 7. Rachel; 8. John; 9. Theophilus. Sabah Farrington (1), bom in Windsor, Vt., Oct. 20,1791; married William S. Libbey* * * § and had Mehitable, Rachel, Maria, Ann, Jane, Sarah, William S., and Elizabeth. She died June 20,1826. Daniel Farrington (2) was born in Salem, Mass., July 6,1793; removed to Newburgh about 1811, where he died Nov. 17,1861. He married first, Elizabeth T. Tate (born Nov. 17, 1791, died Aug. 8, 1821,) and had Rachel W., Ezra, and Elizabeth Jane, all of whom died young, and Thomas T.f and Daniel. His second wife was Eva Miller (born Aug. 21, 1791, died April 15, 1870,) by whom he had Ezra,$ Ebenezer, Rachel (married Rev. J. K. Milliken), Mary, John M., and Joseph. He was a painter by trade and conducted that business in Newburgh for nearly fifty years, during which time he was a liberal patron of the various public enterprises which were undertaken ,§ and commanded the confidence of his contemporaries. Ebenezer W. Farrington (3) was born in Salem, Mass., in 1796. He was a brewer and had a small malt-house in Boston, from whence he removed to Newburgh, where he be- came a member of the firm of Law, Bevridge & Co., and subsequently served as president of the Quassaick Bank, president of the Board of Trustees, etc. He was a worthy citizen and a liberal and honorable man. He married Elizabeth, daughter of James Bevridge, and had James B. (married Susan M. Carpenter, of Havana, Schuyler co. j, Elizabeth, Rachel W., Mary L., Ebenezer W. (drowned, 1838), John B. (married Mary A. S., daugh- ter of John McCroskeryH), died in 1869. He died in 1863. Ezra Farrington (1), removed South; died unmarried. Susan Farrington (5) married George Gray and had George, Daniel, Ward, Mary, Catharine, and Sarah. * Mr. Libbey was a native of New Hampshire, and a carpenter and builder by occupa- tion. He died in 1869, aged 83 years. His son, William S., is now of the firm of Hilton & Libbey, successors to Alexander T. Stewart, New York. f Rev. Thomas T. Farrington was born in Newburgh, March 21, 1821. He received a classical education at Union College, arid afterwards entered the Theological Seminary at Newburgh, where he completed his preparation for the ministry. After leaving the latter institution, he filled three pastorates successively, viz: at Geneva, Salem (Washington co.), and Oxbow. In the summer of 1861 he accepted the pastorate of the Associate Reformed church of Newburgh, and continued in that relation until June 5th, 1875, when he died almost instantly from disease of the heart. He married Mary M. Wilkin, of Hampton- burgh, and left six children. £ Ezra Farrington was born April 1,1826, and died of disease of the heart, Feb. 25,1875. He was for several years associated with his father in business, and subsequently (in com- pany with his brother Daniel) became his successor. He was an active member of the republican party, and was repeatedly the recipient of honors from his political friends. In addition to minor local positions, he filled the office of postmaster from 1861 to 1866, and from 1869 until his death. He married Margaret Casterline and left five children. § Ante p. 227, 229, 238, 267. || John McCroskery was a native of Ireland. He left the place of his birth in 1813, at the age of 11 years. When within a few hours sail of New York, the vessel on which he was a passenger was captured by a British cruiser and taken to Halifax, where he remained about two years when he came to Newburgh. He married here Catharine Shields, and had Mary A. S., who married John B. Farrington; Agnes E., now deceased, and John J, S., now mayor of the city and cashier of the Bank of Newburgh;BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 407 Mary Farrington (6) married Peter Amerman and had Newton, Lander, and Mary. Rachel Farrington (7) married first, James Law, and second, Benjamin Lander,* * * § by whom she had Hannah, and Sarah (married Benj. H. Mace). She died Feb. 23, 1838. John Farrington (8) married and settled in New York. Theophilus Farrington (9) married Eliza, daughter of Derick Amerman; settled in Indianapolis, Indiana. , SAMUEL LOGAN FAMILY. Samuel Logan, presumed to have been born in Ireland, was a cor- poral in the 80th regiment of the English army in the French and Indian war of 1755-’59, and received as a bounty for his services a tract of two hundred acres of land in the present town of Charlotte, Yt. He settled in New Windsor prior to the war of the Revolution, and at the outbreak of that war was appointed captain of a company of minute men. On the 26th of July, 1776, he was commissioned major in Col. Lewis DuBois’ regiment in the continental service, and in October, 1777, was taken prisoner at Fort Montgomery. He was released by exchange, Dec. 21, 1780, having remained a prisoner of war over three years. He returned to his regiment (then the 5th New York) and remained on duty until the end of the war, when he became entitled to half-pay for life. He was one of the original members of the Society of Cincinnati ;f was a hatter by trade, and followed’ that avocation in New Windsor for many years. He married Abigail Clark of Cornwall, and had: 1. Susan, who married Nathaniel Hubbard and had Mary, Susan, Nathaniel, and Walter. 2. Harriet, who married Jonathan Kniffen of New Windsor (Jan. 12, 1805), and had Algnor, Edward, Samuel, Frederick, Henrietta, Mary, and Sally. 3. Abigail, who married John Walsh (brother of William and Henry Walsh), and had: 1. William M., who had Mary, Julia, Harriet, Wil- liam, and John; 2. Jonathan C., who had John, Charles, and Wallace; 3. Harriet, who married Thomas Shaw; 4. Mary; 5. Jane, who mar- ried Thomas Shaw; 6. Hiram, and 7. Isaac, who died unmarried. 4. Betsey, who married Thomas Nicholson. 5. Polly, who married Thomas Nicholson. 6. James, who married Mary Rogers and had: 1. Samuel R.,J who married Sally Andrews and had Mary H., who married Peter Ward;§ * Mr. Lander was for several years associated with Daniel Farrington under the firm of Farrington & Lander. He was a native of Massachusetts, and is spoken of as a man of sterling integrity. He died in 1839, aged 41 years. t By descent this membership is now in James J. Logan of Newburgh. 4 Samuel R. Logan was captain of the steamboat Providence, of Oakley & Davis’ line, 1833 and part of 1834. He died in the early part of the latter yeai\ § Peter Ward was born in Ramapo, Rockland county, Sept. 30, 1827, and finished his education in Goshen. He commenced fife as a conductor on the Erie railroad in 1843; subsequently served as civil engineer, and from 1851 to 1859 was superintendent of the New- burgh branch. In 1859 he became one of the firm of Ward & Leonard (now.Ward & Logan.)408 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. James J., who married Mary E., daughter of George Mecklem, and three children who died in infancy; 2. Abigail, who married Jackson Oakley; 3. Cornelia, married Aaron Dezendorf; 4. Caroline, married John H. Lane of Canterbury; 5. Elizabeth, who died unmarried; 6. Edward H., died unmarried; 7. Julia Ann, • married Nicholas Wilson. He resided in New Windsor, and was accidentally drowned in 1833. 7. Samuel M., who married Julia allock and had: 1. Betsey, who married Lindsey Sherwood and had George L.; Julia E., married Stephen Baker; Adalaide, married Michael Fitchey; Mary, married Thomas Brush; Jane; Eugene; Catharine,* and Harriet; 2. DeWitt; 3. -Martha, married a Murray; 4. Jane; 5. Nancy. 8. William, unmarried. THE WALSH BROTHERS. Thomas, John, William, Henry, and Michael Walsh* were the sons of Michael Walsh, an immigrant from Ireland and a resident of New Windsor, from whence Thomas removed to Great Bend, Pa., and William and Henry to Newburgh about the commencement of the present century. The children of Thomas have not been ascertained. John was a blacksmith in New Windsor. He married Abigail Logan and had: 1. Harriet, married Thos. Shaw; 2. Mary Ann; 3. Hiram; 4. Isaac; 5. Jane, married Thos. Shaw; 6. Jonathan B.; 7. William M. William was one of the early merchants of Newburgh; was for many years supervisor of the town, and for twenty years president of the Bank of Newburgh. He erected the building now on the south-west corner of Water and Third streets, where he kept his store and his residence until he retired from mercantile business, when he pur- chased the Betts homestead, on Montgomery street, near First, where he resided until his death. He was bom Jan. 7th, 1763, and died Nov. 2d, 1839. His wife, Mary daughter of Joseph Morrell, was born Jan. 7th, 1784, and died March 24, 1866. Their children were: 1. Joseph Morrell, born March 13, 1802, died Dec. 3d, 1838; 2. Margaret, born June 25th, 1805, died Aug. 1st, 1849; married E. Crosby, of Fishkill; 3. William Henry, born July 25th, 1807, married Ann Tousey; 4. Albert, born Dec. 1st, 1810, died March 31, 1857; 5. Charles, born April 28th, 1813, married Melisse Ann Halstead; 6. Mary Ann, born June 28, 1815, married William Wells; 7. Edward Lewis, bom Nov. 8, 1817; 8. John Johnston (now the Bev. John J. Walsh), born April 4th, 1820, married Emma Brett; 9. Norman Andrews (twin brother of John J.), died July 26, 1840; 10. Sarah Elizabeth, born June 16, 1827, married James Bull. * The original name is said to have been Welch, and that William was the first to change . the orthography. William and his brother Henry kept stores on opposite sides of the street; the former had Walsh painted on his sign and the latter Welch.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES: 409 Henry commenced business in Newburgh, in 1798, as a maker and dealer in boots and shoes. He married Mehitable Bull, and had: 1. Julia Ann, married a Wells; 2. Mehitable; 3. Abraham (married Rachel Ann Simmons); 4. James; 5. Thomas (now Doct. Thomas of Port Jervis); 6. George Augustus; 7. Robert. Michael married a daughter of William Sayre, of New Windsor, and had: 1. Harriet; 2. Mary. SHAWS OF NEWBURGH AND NEW WINDSOR; Thomas and John Shaw (brothers) came from Ireland in 1790 and settled in New Windsor, Thomas had two sons, Thomas, Jr., bom in 1799, and Robert, born in 1803. Thomas, Jr., married first, Eleanor Burnett and had Crawford. He married, second, Harriet, daughter of John Walsh and granddaughter of Samuel Logan, and had: 1. George W., bom July 31, 1824, married Rhoda B. Alexander and had Thomas, Mary, Catharine, Charles B., Jennie S., and Harry; 2. Charles B., married Henrietta Roderman and had Henry Berry, and Maria Bradley; 3. Elkanah K., married Elizabeth McCoun. He married, third, jane, daughter of John Walsh. He removed to Newburgh in 1832, where, after conducting for several years the business of an architect and builder, he was the founder, in 1852, of the firm of Thos. Shaw & Sons. His son, Elkanah K., has served as an alderman, and as a water commissioner, of the city, and has given evidences of his architectural skill in the . plans for the Union Presbyterian church edifice, the Grand street public school building, the house of fire com- panies No’s. 2 and 5, and in many private residences. Robert Shaw (brother to Thomas, Jr.,) married $nd had Samuel B., who married Mary Jane Mackimson; and Mary Ellen, who married Charles J. Griggs. John Shaw (brother to Thomas, senr.,) married and had 1. Thomas G., who married Betsey Kemochan and had Margaret, Maria, John, Mary Elizabeth, and Sarah; 2. James, who married Eliza Burnett, without issue; 3. Margaret, who married Andrew Kernochan and had Joseph; 4. Mary, who married James McCartney and had George, John, Robert, James, Elizabeth (married James. Finlay), and Jane Ann (married Samuel Clelland, Jr.) WARD M. GAZLAY. Ward M. Gazlay is said to have been a native of Pennsylvania. He purchased, at Goshen, in 1804, a paper called the Friend of Truth, and changed the title to the Orange Eagle. His establishment was burned soon after and his paper discontinued. AIn 1806, he came to Newburgh and purchased the Recorder of the Times, the title of which410 HISTORT OF NFWBUROH. he changed to the Political Index, which he continued until 1829. In addition to his editorial duties, he filled the office of justice of the peace, and won reputation for probity and impartiality. As an editor he was neither ambitious or industrious; he wrote little beyond brief local notes, although his paper had some character through the con- tributions of Jonathan and Theodore Fisk. His personal appearance was not prepossessing. His stature was under medium size; shoul- ders, and frame broad and thin; carriage ungainly, and gait shuffling; but these exterior aspects were compensated by a heart glowing with charity, and an independence of mind that would beg or die before doing a mean or a dishonest act to win gold or favor. He died April 20, 1836, aged about 54 years.* He married Elizabeth, daughter of Jonathan Carter, and left three sons. JOHN D. SPALDING. John D. Spalding was connected with the Newburgh press for about thirty-eight years. He was born in Salem, Mass., in Jan. 1800. He removed to Newburgh in 1815, in company with his father, the Rev, Joshua Spalding, and was soon after apprenticed to Ward M. Gazlay, then of the Political Index, with whom he remained until 1822, when he commenced the publication of the Newburgh Gazette. He was con- nected with this paper until 1833 or ’34, when he sold out his interest and started the Newburgh Journal, which he continued (subsequently under the title of the Highland Cour ier,) until his death. As a journalist, few men have occupied that position, in the same locality, for a longer term of years; or who, having done so, passed from the stage leaying a more favorable record, than Mr. Spalding. He was not a brilliant writer, but he possessed a sound judgment, was urbane and kind in his disposition, and had many negative qualities through which he secured friends and retained them. In person, he was over six feet in height, light in frame and in flesh, and ungainly in his carriage. He married Elizabeth L., daughter of the Rev. John Johnston, D. D., of Newburgh, and had several children. He died on the 22d of August, 1853, in the 54th year of his age, after an ill- ness of about two days. Samuel Parmenter was of the seventh generation of John Parmen- * To some peculiarities and a few faults, Mr. Gazlay united many excellent qualities both of head and heart. His early career as a magistrate was marked by strict probity, and a sound, discriminating judgment, united to a fixedness of purpose and an impartiality in his decisions which saw no difference between the rich and the poor, the peasant and the king.—Telegraph, April 21,1836.BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 411 ter, who emigrated from England prior to 1639, and settled in Sud- bury, Mass., where he took the freeman’s oath, May 13, 1640. Ezra Parmenter, the father of Samuel, was bom June 16,1760.* His son, Samuel, was bom in the city of Boston, March 2, 1791. He married (1818) Eliza, daughter of Stephen Crane, of Newton, Mass., and soon after removed to Newburgh, where he died, June 29,1841. His wife, Eliza, died Sept. 14, 1849. His children were Charles J., bom 1822, died in 1826; Susan E. C., bom 1830, died in 1856; and Stephen C., born in Warwick, April 9, 1819, married Catharine A. McDowell, Oct. 16, 1844; died December 12,1863, leaving Caroline E., Cornelia A.? Alginette D., Gertrude A., Geneveive C., and Samuel J. Mr. Parmenter was a man of superior talents and great energy of mind, and as a mathematician had few equals. He was for many years surveyor of the village, by appointment of the Board of Trus- tees, and at the time of his death was one of the magistrates of the town. In 1822, he compiled and published “A Concise View of the United States,” a very useful work and one which was eagerly sought for throughout the country. About the same year he made a map of Poughkeepsie, for the authorities of that town. In 1835, in pursu- ance of a resolution of the board of trustees, he made a series of maps of the village of Newburgh and vicinity, showing the outlines, streets, property, etc., from 1752 to 1835. These maps are now on file, and are among the most valuable and important papers in the archives of the city. In 1836, he compiled and published “ A Statis- tical Map of the United States,” which was highly commended, and which met with such ready sale that three editions were printed. From 1825 to 1832, he was the editor and one of the proprietors of the Newburgh Gazette. He was an active Episcopalian, and was the organist of St. George?s church for about seven years. His accuracy as a surveyor was universally admitted, and in all difficult cases he was a recognized authority. He was an accomplished scholar, a useful citizen, and a good man, and he died universally respected. CHARLES U. CUSHMAN. Charles Underhill Cushman was bom in Hartford, Washington county, N. Y., March 20, 1802; and was a lineal descendant of Robert Cushman, one of the original company of Pilgrims, who sailed for the New World, August 5th, 1620, O. S.f His father was Charles Cush- * The children of Ezra Parmenter were Samuel, James, William, Maiy, Elizabeth, Sarah, Nancy (died), James, and Nancy. Elizabeth married Col. Gardiner Thompson, of New- burgh, and had Ezra P., Catharine G., Mary E., William P., Nancy F., Maria T., Helen, Susan P., Charles F.,j&eorge J., and Julia. William Parmenter served several years as a representative in congress from Massachusetts. + Robert Cushman, with his family, took passage on the “Speedwell,” a vessel that sailed in company with the Mayflower. The ‘ ‘ Speedwell ” proving unseaworthy, returned to London, and it was not until November 21,1621, that he landed in America.412 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH. man, of Bennington, Vt., and his mother, Mary, daughter of Augus- tine Underhill. His mother died the tenth day after his birth; and Charles became the foster child of a kind and affectionate aunt, and subsequently of his grandfather Underhill. He enjoyed only such advantages of education as a common school in a thinly settled dis- trict afforded; but, on the death of his grandfather, he removed to the residence of his father, in Bennington, and attended the Academy at that place during four winter sessions. At the age of seventeen he entered, as an apprentice, a book store and printing office at Rutland, Vt., and at nineteen he removed to Boston, and found employment in printing and in mercantile pursuits for four years. During a portion of this time he was in the employ of the father of N. P. Willis. He subsequently passed some time as a proof reader and jobber in the American Tract Society’s printing-rooms in New York. Here, learn- ing that a press and newspaper establishment at Newburgh were for sale, he left the city, and after a few months residence in Newburgh, purchased the Political Index, and established the Orange Telegraph— subsequently the Newburgh Telegraph—the first number of which was issued March 20, 1829. In the autumn of 1839, having become tired of the incessant labors of an editor, he sold the establishment, which soon afterward passed into the hands of H. H. Van Dyck. Mr. Cush- man subsequently held a position in the New York custom house, but was removed on the change of the federal administration in 1841, when he entered the mercantile business in New York, and afterwards in Newburgh. He retired in 1852 with a competency. At the elec- tion in 1853, he was chosen member of assembly from the first assem- bly district of Orange county, and filled the station with credit to himself and to his constituents. In 1858, he removed to Rhinebeck, Duchess county, where he died, June 1, 1859, after an illness of only a few hours. Mi;. Cushman was a man of strong natural abilities, industry, per- severance, independence of mind* and strict integrity. As a writer, his style was vigorous and compact. He used but few words, and in expressing his thoughts his language was plain and unmistakable. His pen was ever ready to expose wrong, and to rebuke alike political friends and foes if their conduct failed to reach his standard of ca- pacity and honesty. As a private citizen, he was active in advancing the interests of the community in which he lived. He was one of the founders of the Newburgh and of the Mechanics5 Library, and also helped to establish the Quassaick Bank, and the Newburgh Savings Bank. In all his public and private walks he was, practical, and ex- hibited the traits of a good citizen and an honest man. In person he was nearly six feet, clear complexion, blue eyes, rather fleshy, and wellBIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. 418 formed. He dressed with extreme neatness, and walked with erect carriage and firm tread. He married, June, 1832, Mary, daughter of Charles, Birdsall, without issue. WILLIAM LESLIE. William Leslie was the father of Alexander Leslie, of Newburgh. He conducted for a short time, the Newburgh Gazette. He died on the 17th Feb. 1838, of consumption. He was a native of Scotland, and during his short residence in Newburgh won the reputation of an. honest and an industrious citizen. ELIAS PITTS. Elias Pitts was born in Columbia county, New York, in the year 1810, and received a liberal education at the Kinderhook Academy. He served an apprenticeship of a few years in the office of the Kinder- kook Sentinel, and on its termination became associated in the editorial management of that paper. Subsequently, he removed to Kochester, and was connected with the editorial department of the Advertiser of that city, a paper published by Henry J. O’Kielly. At the retire- ment of Mr. Yan Dyck from the Newburgh Telegraph, in the winter of 1840, Mr. Pitts assumed the management of that paper, which he con- tinued until 1850. From Newburgh, Mr. Pitts removed to Pough- keepsie, and there became the editor of the Poughkeepsie American. His connection with the public pijess terminated in the autumn of 1853; and he soon after received an appointment to a clerkship in the state department at Washington. In his character as a writer, Mr. Pitts exhibited much originality and ability, maintaining a manly independence, and at the same time laboring zealously to promote the interests of the democratic party, to which he was attached. As a man, he was the soul of good-fel- lowship. In the social circle he had few equals. To affable and pleasant manners and fine conversational powers, he added a mind stored with a fund of anecdote as well as useful information, which made his society sought after and appreciated. He was kind-hearted and generous. The appeal of charity never reached his ears in vain; while personal resentments were never cherished or maintained—in a word, his every-day life appeared to be the reflex of a heart filled with noble and generous impulses. In person, he was about five feet three inches, with a small, but well-proportioned body; head large and well- developed; eyes black and full; hair naturally black but prematurely silvered. He married first, Elizabeth, daughter of John Jamison, of Newburgh, by whom he had Mary E., and John M.; and second, Margaret, daughter of John Whited. He died in Washington, July 21, 1864, from typhoid fever, at the age of 44 years.414 HISTORY OF NEWBURGH CONCLUSION. The writer of this volume has looked in vain for a point in its con- cluding chapter where he could say, “It is finished,” without omiting many biographical sketches of persons as worthy of specific record as any that have been given; but the work having already greatly exceeded the limit assigned to it, he has been obliged to bring it to a conclusion. Embraced in the necessary omissions to which refer- ence is made are sketches of the late Hons. Thomas McKissock and John W. Brown, who were alike distinguished for their legal abilities and their influence in the councils of the people; the late ChanceyM. Leonard, at the time of his death mayor of the city; the late Charles W. Tice, the associate of the writer in the first publication of the History of Newburgh, and whose character as an artist is shrined in many household paintings; and John DeWitt, under whose inspira- tion early commercial avenues were opened. In these as in other cases, however, the general record is complete, and from it specific deductions can readily be made showing their influence and the es- teem in which they were held by their contemporaries. Submitting this volume to the public—the work of his leisure hours—the offspring of a conviction that worthy men are entitled to a remembrance beyond that which may be carved upon perishable mar- ble, and that in proportion as the desire for that remembrance is cul- tivated active members of communities will become higher and nobler in all their ambitions—the writer is confident that whatever imper- fections may be found in it 'will not be charged as imperfections of intent, but that it will be accepted in the spirit in which it has been written, and stand as a monument to the people generally with whom he has been associated during the greater part of his life, and as a specific memorial of many who, active in their day and generation, have passed into the great hereafter.||ppettiri-r. TOWN SUPERVISORS. 1768 1764: 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769-71 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777-80 1781-86 1787-88 1789 1790-91 1792-95 Jonathan Hasbrouck Lewis DuBois John Wandai Benjamin Carpenter Lewis DuBois Edward Hallock Latting Carpenter Jonathan Hasbrouck John Flewwelling Samuel Fowler Wolvert Ecker. Morris Flewwelling Wolvert Ecker Thomas Palmer John Robinson Isaac Fowler, Jr. John Robinson Isaac Fowler 1796-07 1808 1809-10 1811 1812-18 1819-20 1822 1823 1824-31 1832-33 1834 1835-36 1837 1838 1839 1840-44 1842 1843-46 Reuben Tooker Isaac Belknap, Jr. William Ross Jonathan Fisk Leonard Smith Daniel Tooker Leonard Smith William Wear, Jr. William Walsh Robert Lawson William Walsh James G. Clinton Daniel Tooker David W. Bate Jackson Oakley David W. Bate John W. Brown David W. Bate 1847-4:9 Odell S. Hathaway 1850 Enoch Carter 1851 Odell S. Hathaway 1852 Enoch Carter 1853 Samuel J. Farnum 1854 Henry Walsh 1855 Stephen W. Fullerton 1856 Odell S. Hathawav 1857 Albert Noe 1858 Enoch Carter 1859-60 Albert Noe 1861-63 Odell S. Hathaway 1864 William H. Beede 1865 Geo. W. Underhill 1866 C. Gilbert Fowler 1867-70 Nathaniel Barnes, Jr. 1871-76 John W. Bushfield 1866 James R. Dickson Ezra Farrington John C. Adams Jackson Oakley 1867 . Chancey M. Leonard Ezra Farrington James E. Horton Jackson Oakley 1868 James R. Dickson Ezra Farrington James E. Horton Jackson Oakley 1869 Patrick Brennan George Lawson James B. Beveridge Lewis C. Vernol CITY SUPERVISORS. 1870 Patrick Brennan George Lawson James B. Beveridge Lewis C. Vernol 1871 Patrick Brennan George Lawson, Alexander Cauldwell Jackson Oakley 1872 Patrick Brennan Andrew Johnson Daniel S, Waring Jackson Oakley 1873 Patrick Brennan Andrew Johnson Isaac C. Chapman David D. Leon 1874 Patrick Brennan Andrew Johnson Daniel S. Waring , John Miller 1875 Patrick Brennan H. M. Hirschberg Daniel S. Waring John Miller 1876 Patrick Brennan Jacob Tremper* Daniel S. Waring John Miller * Died. Genl. W. R. Brown appointed. COMMISSIONERS OF ALMS-HOUSE. Under the Act “ for the better support of the poor of the Town of Newburgh,” passed March 23,1853, and the Act incorporating the City of Newburgh, passed April 22,1865. 1853— David W. Bate, President. David H. Barclay, Thomas H. Roe, C. F. Belknap, S. W. Fullerton, L. B. Gregory. W. C. Miller, Superintendent—(served until 1867). 1854— David W. Bate, President. Henry Wyckoff, David H. Barclay, S. W. Fullerton, E. A. Brewster, Alfred Post. 1855— Henry Wyckoff, President. David H. Barclay, Thomas H. Roe, C. F. Belknap. S. W. Fullerton, L. B. Gregory. 1856— C. F. Belknap, President. Thos. H. Roe, L. B. Gregory, S.\W. Fullerton, Isaac Wood, Sr. \ 1857— Thomas H. Roe, President. Oliver Belknap, L. B. Gregory, Enoch Carter, Isaac Wood, Sr. 1858— Thomas George, President. Enoch Carter, James Belknap, Isaac Wood, Sr., James H. Mallery, Oliver Belknap. 1859— Thomas George, President. Oliver Belknap, James Belknap, Enoch Carter, George C. Spencer, Wm. H. Beede. 1860— Thomas George, President. James Belknap, George C. Spencer, Wm. H. Beede, Enoch Carter, Cbas. S. Lockwood. 1861— Thomas George, President. Enoch Carter, Wm. H. Beede, George C. Spencer, Chas. S. Lockwood, Ezra Farrington.416 APPENDIX. 1862— Thomas George, President. Enoch Carter, Ezra Farrington, Chas. S. Lock- wood, Wm. H. Beede, David E. Fowler. 1863— Thomas George, Enoch Carter, Ezra Farrington, Chas. S. Lockwood, William H. Beede, David E. Fowler. 1864— Thomas George, Enoch Carter, George Clark, Chas. S. Lockwood, Ezra Farring- ton, William H. Beede. 1865— Chas. S. Lockwood, Ezra Farrington, Thomas George, George Clark, Enoch Carter, Wm. H. Beede. 1866— Ezra Farrington, Thomas George, George Clark, .Enoch Carter, John Little, Chancey M. Leonard. 1867— Ezra Farrington, Thos. George, John Little, Chancey M. Leonard—City; John 8. Purdy, I. Belknap—Town. L. I. Wynans, Superintendent. 1868— Cornelius McLean, Wm. C. Noble, Ezra Farrington, Wm. L. F. Warren—City; John S. Purdy, Wm. H. Beede—Town. MacLeod Rogers, Superintendent. 1869— Cornelius McLean, William C. Noble, Ezra Farrington, W. L. F. Warren—City; John H. Bond, John 8. Purdy—Town. 1870— Ezra Farrington, Enoch Carter, Cornelius McLean, Wm. L. F. Warren—City; John H. Bond, John S. Purdy—Town. 1871— Enoch Carter, Cornelius McLean, Wm. E. Smiley, L. B. Halsey—City; John H. Bond, John S. Purdy—Town. 1872— William E. Smiley, David F. B. Carson, Cornelius McLean, L. B. Halsey—City; John H. Bond, John S. Purdy—Town. 1873— David Carson, President. L. B. Halsey, Cornelius McLean, Wm. E. Smiley— City; John H. Bond, Wm. D. Barns, Jr.—Town. Wm. H. June, Superintendent. 1874— Thos. S. McAlles, David Carson, John L. Sloat, Gavin R. McGrego ’—City; John H. Bond. Wm. D. Barns—Town. «o. 1875— Thomas S. McAlles, President, David Carson, John L. Sloat, Gavin R. Mc- Gregor—City ; John Birdsall, Wm. D. Barns—Town. 1876— Thos. S. McAlles,* President. John L. Sloat, Thos. J. Bannon, Gavin R. Mc- Gregor—City; John Birdsall, Wm. D. Barns—Town. VILLAGE AND CITY OFFICERS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES. 1804— Hugh Walsh, George Monell, Jacob.Powell, William H. Smith, Hugh Spier, John Mandevill, Solomon Sleight. Geo. Monell, President.! 1805— -George Monell, Chas. Clinton, Hugh Walsh, Hugh Spier, Jacob Powell, Solo- mon Sleight, John Mandevill. Geo. Monell, President. • 1806— Isaac Belknap, Jr., Leonard Carpenter, John Mandevill, Sami. Downing, John Anderson, Jr., Jona. Hedges, Alex. Denniston. Isaac Belknap, Jr., President. Chas. Clinton, Clerk. 1807— Hiram Weller, George Monell, Jacob Powell, John McAuley, Daniel Stringham, Hugh Spier, William Taylor. Geo. Monell, President. William Taylor, Clerk. 1808— George Monell, Hiram Weller, John McAuley, William Taylor, Jacob Powell, Daniel Stringham, Hugh Spier. Geo. Monell, President. Wm. Taylor, Clerk. 1809— Jacob Powell, Edmund Griswold, Jona. Hedges, Hugh Spier, Selah Reeve, Geo. Monell, William Ross. George Monell, President. Wm. Ross, Clerk. 1810— Jacob Powell. Selah Reeve, Jonathan Fisk, John D. Lawson, John Mandevill, James Hamilton, John Chambers. James Hamilton, President. Aaron Belknap, Clerk. 1811— Jacob Powell, George Monell, Seth Belknap Jonathan Fisk, Isaac Belknap, Jr., William H. Smith, John Chambers. Jonathan Fisk, President. Aaron Belknap, Clerk. 1812— Jonathan Fisk, Seth Belknap, Jacob Powell, George Monell, John Chambers, John Harris, Cadwallader Roe. Jonathan Fisk, President. Aaron Belknap, Clerk. 1813— Walter Case. Jacob Powell, John Harris, John Chambers. Leonard Carpenter, James Hamilton, John D. Lawson. Walter Case, President. Aaron Belknap, Clerk. 1814— Walter Case, Jacob Powell, John Chambers, John D. Lawson, John Harris, Leonard Carpenter, William Ross. Walter Case, President. Aaron Belknap, Clerk. 1815— Walter Case, Jacob Powell, John Chambers, John Harris, John D. Lawson, Leonard Carpenter, Solomon Sleight. Walter Case, President. David W. Bate, Clerk. 1816— Isaac Belknap, Francis Crawford, John Anderson, Jr., Jonathan Carter, Levi Dodge, Samuel Downing, Henry Walsh. Francis Crawford, President. Nathan C. Sayre, Clerk. 1817— Francis Crawford, Thos. Phillips, Jr., Benoni H. Ho well,§ Isaac Belknap, John Anderson, jr., William Walsh, Samuel Downing. Francis Crawford, President. M. R. Griswold, Clerk. 1818— Francis Crawford, Thomas Phillips, Jr., Benj. Case, Jr., Selah Reeve, William L. Smith, Jacob Carpenter* Jona. Hedges. Selah Reeve, Pres. M. R. Griswold, Clerk.* 1819— Selah Reeve, Thomas Phillips, Jr., William L. Smith, Jonathan Hedges, Samuel Williams, Wm. Seymour, Isaac Belknap. Selah Reeve, Pres. M. R. Griswold, Clerk. 1820— Selah Reeve. Isaac Belknap, Thos. Phillips, Jr., Samuel Williams, Jonathan Hedges, Wm. Seymour, Wm. L. Smith. Selah Reeve, President. M. R. Griswold, Clerk. * Died in December. James W. Tayor appointed to fill vacancy. t Ante p. 183. § Resigned, but resignation not accepted.APPENDIX. 417 1821— Selah Reeve, Jonathan Hedges, Samuel Williams, Thos. Phillips, Jr., Isaac Belknap, Wm. L. Smith, Francis Crawford. Selah Reeve, Prest. John W. Brown, Clerk. 1822— Francis Crawford, Samuel Williams, Isaac Belknap, Thos. Phillips, Jr., Wm. L. Smith, Alex. Falls, Jonathan Hedges. Francis Crawford, Prest. John W. Brown, Clerk. 1823— Francis Crawford, Isaac Belknap, Wm. L. Smith, Sami. Williams, Thos. Phil- lips, Jr., John Forsyth, Alex. Falls. Francis Crawford, President. John W. Brown,Clerk. 1821—Francis Crawford, Samuel Williams, Isaac Belknap, Wm. L. Smith, Thos. Phil- lips, Jr., John Forsyth, Alex. Falls. Francis Crawford, President. John W. Brown, Clerk. 1825— Francis Crawford, President; Isaac Belknap, John Forsyth, Samuel Williams, Thomas Phillips, jr., William L. Smith, William Walsh. John W. Brown, Clerk. 1826— William Walsh, Samuel Williams, John Forsyth, John Ledyard, Robert Lawson, Ward M. Gazlay, Thomas Phillips, Jr. William Walsh, President. Benj. H. Mace, Clerk. 1827— William Walsh, Robert Lawson, Sami. Williams, John Ledyard, John Forsyth, Thos. Phillips, Jr., Joseph Hoffman. William Walsh, President. Benj. H. Mace, Clerk. 1828— William Walsh, Samuel Williams, Robert Lawson, John Ledyard, John Forsyth, Joseph Hoffman, Selah Reeve. Robert Lawson, President. B. H. Mace, Clerk. 1829— Selah Reeve, Samuel Williams, Joseph Hoffman, William Walsh, John Ledyard, David Sands, Samuel G. Sneden. Sami. Williams, President. B. H. Mace, Clerk. 1830— John Ledyard, President; Charles A. Johnes, Jackson Oakley, David Sands, David Crawford, Robert Kelley, Benjamin Carpenter. William B. Wright, Clerk. 1831— Jackson Oakley, President; Robert Lawson, Benjamin Carpenter, Samuel Wil- liams, David Crawford, Aaron Noyes, Moses H. Belknap. Alx. C. Mulliner, Clerk, (served until 1835.) 1832— Moses H. Belknap, President; Robert Lawson, Benjamin Carpenter, Samuel Williams, Da*?id Crawford, Aaron Noyes, Jackson Oakley. 1833— Moses H, Belknap, President; Robert Lawson, Benjamin Carpenter, Samuel Williams, David Crawford, Aaron Noyes, Jackson Oakley. 1834— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel Williams, Benjamin Carpenter, Christo- pher Reevej'David Crawford, Eli Hasbrouck, Jackson Oakley. 1835— John Ledyard, President; Minard Harris, William C. Hasbrouck, Samuel John- son, John Jamison, Samuel J. Farnum, Aaron Noyes. Horace Armstrong, Clerk, (served, until 1838.) 1836— John Ledyard, President; Minard Harris, William C. Hasbrouck, Samuel John- son, George Reeve, Samuel J. Farnum, Aaron Noyes. 1837— John Ledyard, President; Samuel J. Farnum, William C. Hasbrouck, Benjamin Carpenter, Jackson Oakley, David Crawford, Christopher Reeve. 1838— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel J. Farnum, William C. Hasbrouck, Benja- min Carpenter, Jackson Oakley, Nathaniel Dubois, Robert Lawson. Solomon Tuthill, Clerk, (served until 1841.) 1839— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel J. Farnum, William C. Hasbrouck Odell S. Hathaway, Jackson Oakley, Nathaniel Dubois, Robert Wardrop. 1840— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel J. Farnum, Thornton M. Niven, Odell S. Hathaway, George Cornwell, Nathaniel Dubois, Robert Wardrop. 1841— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel J. Farnum, Ebenezer W. Farrington, Odell S. Hathaway, Benjamin Carpenter, Natlian’l Dubois, Benjamin F. Buckingham. Jackson Oakley, Clerk. 1842— Minard Harris, President; William M. Wiley, Joseph Hoffman, George Reeve, William K. Mailler, Samuel Johnson, Alexander Whigam. S. C. Parmenter, Clerk. 1843— Moses H. Belknap, President; Samuel J.. Farnum, Joseph Hoffman, Benj. Tyler, Jefferson Roe, Robert D. Kemp, David W. Gridley. Stephen B. Brophy, Clerk. 1844— Moses H. Belknap, President; Benjamin Tyler, Joseph Hoffman, Ebenezer W. Farrington, Aikman Spier, Robert D. Kemp, Homer Ramsdell. Jackson Oakley, Clerk, (served until 1847.) 1845— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Lewis W. Young, David Crawford, Robert A. For- syth, William L. F/Warren, Edmund S. Sanxay, Homer Ramsdell. 1846— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Lewis *W. Young, David Crawford, Robert A. For- syth, William L. F. Warren, Aikman Spier, Homer Ramsdell. 1847— Samuel J. Farnum, President ; Homer Ramsdell, David Crawford, Robert A. Forsyth, William L. F. Warren, Aikman Spier, Wm. P. C. Smith. Peter F. Hunn, Clerk. 1848— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Homer Ramsdell, David Crawford, Robert A. For- syth, William L. F. Warren, Aikman Spier, Wm. P. C. Smith. David C. Ringland, Clerk. 1849— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Homer Ramsdell, Lewis W. Young, Robert A. Forsyth, William L. F. Warren, Lewis D. Lockwood, Eli Hasbrouck, Jackson Oakley, Clerk. * The following singular oath was taken by Griswold on entering upon his duties: “ I, Marvin R. Griswold, being chosen Clerk of the Corporation of the Village of New- burgh, do solemnly swear that I will in all things, to the best of my knowledge and ability, execute ana perform the duties enjoined on me, and that I will not divulge or make public any of the proceedings of the Corporation until the same shall be published by them or their order; nor at any time disclose or discover the votes or opinions of any member of the said body, unless required to give evidence thereof in a Court of Justice. [Signed] M. R. GRISWOLD. Sworn and subscribed the 5th day of May, 1818, James Hamilton. 027418 APPENDIX. 1850— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Homer Ramsdell, Lewis W. Young, Robert A. For- syth, William L. F. Warren, Lewis D. Lockwood, Eli Hasbrouck. Jackson Oakley, Clerk. 1851— Samuel J. Farnum, President; Minard Harris, Homer Ramsdell, Robert Lawson, Henry T. McCoun, Thornton M. Niven, Eli Hasbrouck. Daniel G. Niven, Clerk. 1852— Ebenezer W. Farrington, President; Robert Lawson, Charles Drake, Geo. Gearn, William L. F. Warren, John R. Gorham, Eli Hasbrouck. Charles Halstead, jr., Clerk, (served until 1864.) 1853— Ebenezer W. Farrington, President; Robert Lawrson, Samuel J. Farnum, George Gearn, William L. F. Warren, John R. Gorham, Eli Hasbrouck. 1854— William L. F. Warren, President; Samuel 33. Gregory, Franklin Gerard, James H. Mallory, Edson H. Clark, John R. Gorham, Charles Johnson. 1855— William L. F. Warren, President; John F. Van Nort, Eli Hasbrouck* Edwin T. Comstock, William E. Peck, Charles H. Doughty, William H. Callahan. 1856— William L. F. Warren, President; George W. Kerr, Franklin Gerard, Edwin T. Comstock, James H. Mallory, Isaac Wood, jr., Lewis D. Lockwood. 1857— William L. F. Warren, President; Ebenezer W. Farrington, Franklin Gerard, Halsey R. Stevens, Robert Sterling, George Lawson, Michael Doyle. 1858— William L; F. Warren, President; Ebenezer W. Farrington, Edwin T. Comstock, Halsey R. Stevens, Robert Sterling, George Lawson, Michael Doyle. 1859— William L. F. Warren, President; Ebenezer W. Farrington, J. H. H. Chapman, Halsey R. Stevens, Robert Sterling, George Lawson, Michael Doyle. 1860— William L. F. Warren, President; Ebenezer W. Farrington, J. H. H. Chapman, George C. Spencer, Robert Sterling, George Lawson, Michael Doyle. 1861— Homer Ramsdell, President; Robert Sterling, J. H. H. Chapman, Thomas Beve- ridge, John Lomas, George Lawson, Isaac S. Fowler. 1862— Robert Sterling, President; Thomas Beveridge, J. H. H. Chapman, Homer Rams- dell, John Lomas, Hugh McOutcheon, Isaac S. Fowler. 1863— Robert Sterling, President; Thomas Beveridge, J. H. H. Chapman, Homer Rams- dell, John Lomas, Cornelius McLean, Isaac S. Fowler. 1864— William L. F. Warren, President; David Moore, Benjamin B. Odell, James Bigler, .Chas. Root, Robert A. Forsyth, Lewis Jennings. Chas. B. Royce, Clerk, (served until 1866.) 1865— David Moore, President; James Bigler, Benjamin B. Odell, Alexander Leslie, Charles Root, Edson H. Clark, Jacob Brown. MAYORS AND COMMON COTJNctL. 1866— Mayor—George Clark ; Aldermen—First Ward, Daniel A. Rheutan, John Lomas; Second Ward, Henry Ross, John Corwin ; Third Ward, Edson H. Clark, Benj. B. Odell; Fourth Ward, James Bigler, James Whitehill. Chas. B. Royce; Clerk, (served until 1872.) 1867— Mayor—George Clark'; Aldermen—First Ward, Daniel A. Rheutan, George M. Clapp ; Second Ward, Henry Ross, James H. Phillips; Third Ward, Edson H. Clark, Chas, Root; Fourth Ward, James Bigler* David Moore. 1868— Mayor—George Clark; Aldermen—First Ward, G. M. Clapp, Alexander McCann; Second Ward, James H. Phillips, William R. Brown ; Third Ward, Charles Root, Jonathan N. Weed; Fourth Ward, David Moore, Abram S. Cassedy. 1869— Mayor—George Clark; Aldermen—First Ward, Alexander McCann, Gavin R. McGregor; Second Ward, William R. Brown, Francis Boyd; Third Ward, Jonathan N. Weed, J. J. S. McCroskery; Fourth Ward, Alex. Cauldwell, Jacob Brown. 1870— Mayor—Robert Sterling. (Dec’d.) Alexander McCann, Presiding Officer and Acting Mayor ; Aldermen^—First Ward, Alexander McCann, Gavin R. McGregor; Second Ward, Elkanah K. Shaw, Francis Boyd; Third Ward, Charles Root, J. J. S. McCroskery ; Fourth Ward, Alex. Cauldwell, James T. Lawson. Orville M. Smith, Clerk, (served un- til 1872.) - 1871— Mayor, William W. Carson ; Aldermen—First Ward, Alexander McCann, William Doyle ; Second Ward, Elkanah K. Shaw, Robert Whitehill; Third Ward, Charles Root, J. J. S. McCroskery ; Fourth Ward, Nathaniel B. Hayt, Jame^ T. Lawson. 1872— Mayor—Samuel E. Shutes; Aldermen—First Ward, Joseph M. Dickey, William Doyle ; Second Ward, Henry F. Travis, Robert Whitehill ; Third Ward, Edward Haigh, J. J. S. McCroskery; Fourth Ward, Nathaniel R. Hayt, Robert Kernahan. Daniel J. Coutant, Clerk, (1877.) : 1873— Mayor, Samuel E. Shutes; Aldermen—First Ward, Joseph M. Dickey, William Doyle; Second Ward, Henry F. Travis, William Cameron ; Third Ward, Edward Haigh, John C. Adams ; Fourth Ward, Nathaniel B. Hayt, Robert Kernahan. 1874— Mayor—Chancey M. Leonard*; Aldermen—First Ward, William Doyle, Hugh Hamilton; Second Ward, William F. Cameron, John Dotzert; Third Ward, John C. Adams, Grant E. Edgar ; Fourth Ward, Nathaniel B. Hayt, Lewis B. Halsey. 1875— 76—Mayor—John J. S. McCroskery; Aldermen—First Ward, William Doyie, Hugh Hamilton; Second Ward, William F. Cameron, John Dotzert; Third Ward, John C. Ad- ams, GrantE. Edgar; Fourth Ward, Noah Collard, Richard Sterling. * Mayor Leonard having died on the 3d of December, 1874, the President of the Com- mon Council, N. B. Hayt, became Acting Mayor, in accordance with provision of the City Charter.419 APPENDIX, MEMBERS OF BOARD OF EDUCATION. Alsdorf, Egbert 1862-65 Bevridge, John 1852-57 Bevridge, Thomas . 1858-60 Brewster, E. A. 1858-63 .1867-68—1873-77 Brown, Rev. John 1852-58 Brown, Jacob 1855 Callahan, W. H. 1861 Case, Robert L. 1874-77 Cassedy, A. S. 1875-77 Clapp, George M.- 1865 Clark, George 1858-60 Corwin, John 1864-72 Culbert, Dr. W. A. M. 1855-57 Dickson, James R. 1857-59 Ely, Dr. Smith 1876-77 Estabrook, Chas. 1864-72 Forsyth, Rev. John 1853-77 Gearn, W. W. 1876-77 George, Thomas 1859-61 Gregory, L. B. 1852-54 Haines, P. S. 1867-70 Hirschberg, M. H. 1871-77 Jones, Nathaniel 1852-56 Johnes, Edward R. 1861-63 Kerr, George W. 1852-54 Kimball, Thos. 1864-67,1873 Lawson, John K. 1858-61 Leonard, D. Gillis 1852-57 1860-62, 1864 Leonard, Chancey M. 1869-71 Lewis, John N. 1870-72 Martin, Cyrus B. 1868-73 McCutcheon, Hugh 1863-66 1868-69 Merritt, Theodore 1870 Moore, B.B. 1872-75 Monell, J. J. 1852-54,1865 Peck, William E. 1862-64 Reeve, Charles F. V. 1852 Reilly,. John 1872-75 Ring, Thomas C. 1852-57 Rogers, Daniel T. 1866-72 1875-77 Ruttenber, E. M. 1857-64 1866-69 Smith, Orville M. 1856-57 1859-64 Thayer, John S. 1855 Ward, Peter 1861-66 Williams, Samuel 1856-58 Wilson, Nicholas 1867-74 President—John Bevridge, 1852-57; John Forsyth, 1858-77. Clerk—Nathl. Jones, 1852-57; Hugh S. Banks, 1852-59; Dr. R. Y. K. Montfort, 1859-63, 1872-76 ; E. M. Ruttenber, 1863-64; Hiram A. Jones, 1864-72. WATER COMMISSIONERS. , With the exception of the Commissioners appointed for the construction of the Water- works, the duties of Water Commissioners were discharged by the. Board of Trustees until the adoption of the City charter, since which time the following persons have been members of the Board of Water Commissioners: George Clark, 1866-71 Francis Scott, 1866-71 J. D. Shafer, 1866-69 Robert Sterling, 1869 C. M. Leonard, 1869-72 Wm. Wyckoff, 1869-72 John F. Yan Nort, 1870-75 Franklin Gerard, 1871-75 Timothy Townsend, 1871-75 Wm. W. Carson, 1872-77 Sami. G. Kimball, 1872-77 J. H. H. Chapman, 1875-77 E. K. Shaw, 1875-76 L. M. Smith, 1875-76 Chas. Root, 1876-77 H. B. Beckman, 1876-77 Superintendent—D. T. Rogers, 1866; Leander Clark, Jr., 1866-69 ; N. W. Allard, 1869- 70 ; Chas. B. Royce; 1870-73; E. C. Boynton, 1873-77. . ■ * The first SEALS OF THE VILLAGE AND CITY OF NEWBURGH, seal in use by the Board of Trustees was one previously obtained by the Trus- tees of the Fire Department. It had for its design a figure of Justice, encircled with the words, “ Seal of the Trustees of Newburgh.” The second seal was adopted June 7,1819. It is described by Mr. William Rollinson, of New York, by whom it was engraved, as fol- lows : “ The figure is a representation of the Deity of the Hudson, or a River God (Aqua- rius, the water-bearer,) according to Heathen Mythology, pouring forth the river from his urn, and bearing in his right hand an antique Rudder of a vessel, as an emblem of the ex- tensive navigation and commerce of the river; and the Hudson is designated by the arms of the State of New York being blazoned upon the rudder—which I believe corresponds with the idea communicated to me.” This descrip- tion is rather crude, but it was approved by the Board and entered upon its minutes. The seal of the City of Newburgh was adop- ted in 1866, and is shown by the accompany- ing engraving. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 1609—Mahicanituk river discovered by Hudson. 1652—Hostilities commenced by Esopus Indians. 1660—First Esopus (or Indian) War. 1663—Second Esopus War. 1683—Original County of Orange organized.420 APPENDIX. 1684—First settlement in the present County of Orange by Scotch immigrants at Plum Point, in New Windsor. 1684—Lands extending from the Paltz to Stony Point purchased from the Indians by Gov. Dongan. 1690—Second settlement in the presept County of Orange by William Tietsort in the town of Deerpark. 1694—Lands purchased by Gov. Dongan patented to Capt. John Evans under the title of “ Manor of Fletcherdon.” 1699—Evans’ Patent vacated by an Act of the Assembly. 1709— Third settlement in the present County of Orange by Palatine, immigrants on the site of the City of Newburgh. 1710— Precinct of the Highlands established by an order of Court of Sessions of Ulster county, as a Court district, 1712-14—Settlement of Wawayanda Patent at Goshen, Warwick and Gray-court. 1719—Lands at Quassaick creek patented to Palatine immigrants—including a Glebe of 500 acres for the support of a Lutheran minister; settlement designated, “ The Palatine Parish by Quassaick.5’ 1725—First Presbyterian church in present County erected at Goshen. 1738—First Church erected in Newburgh by Lutherans. 1743—Newburgh Plot laid out by Alexander Golden: First application of the name of Newburgh to the present City. 1743—The Precinct of Goshen erected. 1743— Ferry established at Newburgh by charter to Alexander Colden. 1744— Precinct of the Highlands erected by an Act of the Assembly, and Supervisor and other officers elected. 1747—Members of the Church of England elected Trustees of Glebe, and the Church edifice closed against the Lutheran minister. 1752—First Patent-for Glebe surrendered and the Second Patent issued, confirming in- come of Glebe to Church of England : Settlement designated, “ The Parish of Newburgh.” 1763—Precinct of Highlands divided, and the Precinct of Newburgh and the Precinct of New Windsor erected therefrom. . . : . 1769—Seventeen buildings on the site of the present City of Newburgh. 1772—Precinct of Newburgh divided and the Precinct of Newburgh and the Precinct of New Marlborough erected. 1775—Committees of Safety appointed in the Precincts of the County. 1779—Washington’s Head-quarters established at Ellison house, New Windsor. 1782— Washington’s Head-quarters established at Newburgh. 1783— Army disbanded. . 1788—The Towns of Newburgh, Cornwall, Goshen, Warwick, Minnisink, New Windsor, Wallkill, and Montgomery, erected by general Act. 1794— Presbyterians elected Trustees of Glebe: Organization of St. George’s Church broken up by the Revolution. 1795— First newspaper, “The Newburgh Packet,” printed. 1796— Newburgh Post-office established. 1798—The present County of Orange erected. 1800—The Village of Newburgh incorporated. 1805—Glebe charter amended, and income applied to the support of School A 1866—The City of Newburgh incorporated. ERRATA. While*the greatest cafe has been taken to prevent the admission of any erroneous state- ment or date, it is possible that in reviewing so many subjects as are embraced in this volume, errors have not been wholly avoided. When it is remembered that it has been found necessary to correct every history that has been written and every map that has been printed; that traditions have been found at wide variance with established records; that several thousand names and dates have been recorded—a claim of entire accuracy would be presumptuous. The reader, if better informed than the writer, will please cor- rect whatever may be found amiss in the respects referred to as well as in orthography./ general CHAPTER I.............. p.5 History of Orange County—In the Beginning—Aboriginal Era —The Wars for Possession—1492, 1664. CHAPTER II.. ..........p 16 History of Orange County—Ab- original Deeds^—Land Patents— First Settlements—1664, 1709. CHAPTER III......7?....p.29 History of Orange County—Civil Government — Organization of Counties, Precincts and Towns —Courts and Court Houses—Co- lonial Politics-1683, 1798. CHAPTER IV.............p.49 History of Orange County—Lo- cation—Physiology— Geographi- cal Nomenclature—Climate—Ge- ology—Soils, etc. CHAPTER V................ p.80 History of Orange County—The French and Indian War—War of the Revolution—Wars of the Re- public. CHAPTER VI.............p.95 History of Orange County—Ju- dicial History—Public Buildings — Civil Administration — Town Boundaries—General Summary. CHAPTER VII.......... p.lll History of Newburgh—The Sec- ond Patents-The Palatine Parish by Quassaick. CHAPTER VIII............p.125 The Parish of Newburgh—Set- tlement of Adjoining Patents— . Precinct Officers—Revolutionary Events—The Town of Newburgh —The Glebe in the hands of the people—The Village of Newburgh —Infidelity—Recollections. CHAPTER IX..............p.183 Village of Newburgh—.Amended Glebe Charter—Second War with England—War of the Rebellion— Business Review—General Sum- mary. CHAPTER X...............p. 205 Newburgh Localities—Census Re- turns—Support of Poor — Turn- pikes and Plank Roads — Rail- road Enterprises—Banking In- stitutions—Incorporated Compa- nies — Supply of Water — New- burgh Post-office — Commercial Record—Newburgh Ferry—Fire Department — Principal Fires— Regatta Association—Horticultu- ral Society—Mechanical Indus- tries. CHAPTER XI.......... p.273 The Militia prior to and during the Revolution—General Organi- zation and Continental Regim’ts —Militia since the Revolution- Rebellion Record. CHAPTER XII............p.289 Newburgh Churches—Religious and Literary Societies—Schools — Newspapers — Benevolent So- cieties, Ac. CHAPTER XIII. ....... p.353 Biographical and Genealogical Sketches. APPENDIX. .............p.414 Town and City Supervisors—Vil- lage and City Officers—Seals- Chronological Record. INDEX. ............... p.421 Aborginal Era. 7 Indian Tribes, 9 “ . Deeds, 19,80,21,23,24 “ War Cry, 11 “ War—First, 11 “ Wars—Esopus, 13 Indian Names—Sginification of Arackhook, 68 Assawaghkemeck, 66 General Explanation, 53 Hasdisch, 66 Long House, 67 Minnising. Mongawpmg, Muchattoes, Navesing, Pochuck, 65 55 51 56 69,205 54 10 63 17 55,69 162,340 102 129,168 103 186,193,232 Schuncmttnk, Seepu, Shawangunk, Woerawin, . Kahanksen Castle, . Maringoman’s Castle, Academy, Newburgh . Agricultural Products, Albertson’s Tavern, American Star, Banking Institutions. Bank of Newburgh, Branch Bank of Newburgh, Bank of Orange County, iya Bank of United States, 193 Bank Suspensions, 236 Highland Bank, 192,233 Newburgh Savings Bank, 235 Powell Bank, 194,196,234 Quassaick Bank, 235 Balmv.ille, (see Localities) Balm of Gilead Tree, 182,206 Barges and Propellers, 249 Beacon Fires, 89,190 Belknap’s Ridge, (see Localities) Billings Anthem,Independence 154 Bills of Credit, 158 Biographical and Genealogical Acker, Wolvert 373 Albertson, Richard Belknap Family, Birdsalf Family, Bowman, Phineas Brown, Rev. John 403 Brown, John Carpenter Family, Carter Family, 384 Colden, Alexander 355 Crawford Family, 395 Cushman, Charles U. 411 DeGrove Family, 382 Downing Family, 398 Farrington Familyv 405 Fisk, Jonathan 391 Flewwelling Family, 364 Forsyth, John 394 , Fowler Family, 364 jjGardiner, Robert 387 Gazlay, Ward M. 409 Gulch, Melchior 354 Hasbrouck Family, 369 Ilofiman, Zacharias 355 Hoffman, Joseph 388 Hutchins, John Nathan 375 Innis Family, 375 Kockerthal, Joshua, Rev. 353 Leslie, William 413 Ludlow Family, 399 Mailler Family, 397 Merritt Family, 363 Meynders, Burger 355 Oakley Family, 397 Parmenter, Samuel 410 Penny Family, 374 Pitts, Elias 413 Powell Family, 401 Purdy Family, r 367 Ramsdell Family, 403 Reeve Family, 375 Roe Family, 371 Schultz Family, ^ 393 Seymour, William 377 Smith Family, 356 Shaw, Thomas and John 409 Spaldmg, John D. 410 Storey, Jonas 392 Walsh Brothers, 408 Walsh, Hugh 381 Warren Family, 378 Weigand, Michael 354 Weygant, Charles H. 354 Biographical Notes. Adams, Ebenezer 339 Alexander, James 121 Armstrong, Major John 149 Belknap, Hezekiah 362 Benedict, E. C. 341 Bloomer, Joseph 181 Brewster, Eugene A. 404 Burnet, Gov. William 121 Burnet, Rev. Eleazer 298 Chapman, Paddock 387 Charlton, Rev. Richard 289 Close, Rev. John 298 Cochran, Robert 157 Coleman, Joseph 368 Colden, Gov. 355 Colden, Cadwallader 356 Cooper, Rev. Ezekiel 324 Cushman, Robert 411 Davis, Elder Luke 319 Denniston, David 166,346 DeWitt, John 382 Donnelly, Peter 168 DuPuy, Samuel * 27 Edmonston, James 356 Falls, Alexander 369 Farrington, Rev. T. T. 406 Farrington, Ezra 406 Foote, Ebenezer 243 Fowler, Rev. Samuel 326 Freeman, Rev. Jonathan 298 Gouverneur, Abraham 47 Gregory, Samuel O. 362 Guimar, Peter 25 Hartwick, Rev. Mr. 178 Hasbrouck, Abraham 369 Hedges, Dr. Phineas 166 Kerr, George W. 404 Lander, Benjamin 407 Lewis, Rev. Isaac * 298 Libbey, Wm. S. 406 Machin, Capt. Thomas 211 McCroskery, John 406 McGregorie, Patrick 20 Merritt, Underhill 364 Palmer, Rev. Elihu 165 Palmer, Col. Thomas 368 Parmenter, Ezra 411 Phillips, Rev. George 374 Phillips, Robert 364 Sanxay, Edmund S. 387 Sayre, Rev. John 177,291 Scott, William 387 Smith, Nathan 121 Smith, William 283 Scrimgeour, Rev. James 811 Thayer, William 380 Tietsort, William 25 Tooker, Charles 368 Ward, Peter 407 Watkins, Rev. Hezekiah 290 Williams, Jonas 374 Winfield, Elias 346422 GENERAL INDEX. Blooming Grove. Support of Poor, Page 97 Town Boundaries, 103 Block Houses, 91 Blue Ball Tavern, 173 Bridgeville Bridge, 181 Burgoyiie’s Expedition, 87,89 Camp Ground, 144 Cayuga Lake, Steamer on 191 Chester. Militia Rendezvous at 86 Town Boundaries, 108 Churches. American Reformed, 315 Bethlehem, 101,295 Calvary Presbyterian, Catholic—St. Patrick’s, St. Mary’s, 333 Church of England, 123,125 Church of the Corner-Stone, 295 Church of Our Father, 335 Episcopal, 161,162,289 First Associate Reformed, 162,311 • First Baptist, 318 First Presbyterian, 162,295 First Reformed Presbyterian, 313 First United Presbyterian, 315 First Universalist, African M. E. and Baptist, ooo Lutheran, Newburgh, 101,120,289 Lutheran, New York, 119,123 Maghaghkeraek, 90,101 Methodist Classes, """ Fostertown, Gardnertown, Grace Middlehope, Rossville, Trinity St. John’s St. Paul’s Newburgh Mission, « Number in County, St. Andrew’s, St. George’s, St. George’s Mission, St, Paul’s, 294 Second Baptist,. 323 Second Presbyterian, 302 Second Refor’d Presbyterian, 314 331 130 ' 101 131,292 Union Presbyterian, Church Architecture, Church Statistics, Civil Government, . 307 204 335 29 ____________________________ 34 {Colonial Politics, 44 Commissioners of Highways, 34 First Code bf Laws, 31 Organization of Counties, 32 Precinct Organizations, 35 Representatives in Assembly, 42 Supervisors, 33 Town Organizations, 39 Climate. Cornwall, 71 Goshen, 71 Newburgh, 70 Shawangunk Range, 71 Coffee House, Newburgh, 200 Colden’s Dock, 172,244 Colden House, 173,199 Colonnade Row, , 200 Commercial Record. Docks, . 244 Forwarders, 245 Sloop Lines, 244 Steamers and Barges, 247 Steamboat Captains, 249 Committee of Safety, 135,137 Powers of 138 Continental Dock, 172 Blacksmith Shop, 173 Ferry, 173,177,251 Store-house, 299 Regiments, 276 Copper Coinage, 163,171,211 Cornwall, Precinct of 36 Population 1790, 41 Town Boundaries, 104 Counties, Original County of Orange, Agricultural Products, Board of Supervisors, 33,100 Boundaries, 35,41 Characteristics of People, 100 Climate, 70 County Clerk’s Office, Courts, 42,93 County of Orange (continued). Court Houses, 43,93 Geology, etc. .71 Insane Asylum, 99 Location, 49 Mountains and Valleys, 50 Origin of Name, 35 Original Organization, • ■ 34 “ Precincts and Towns, 35,38, Ponds, Streams, etc., Physiology, 49 Population, 28,41,85,103 Religious Summary, 101 Reorganization, .40 Representatives, .45 Sheriffs, 44 Stock Horses, 103 Support of Poor, 97 Surrogates, 43 Surrogate’s Office, Town Boundaries, Crawford. Town Boundaries, 107 Deerpark. Settlement of 25 Town Boundaries, . 104 DeGrove’s Tavern, 173 Demott’s Tavern, 182 Denton’s Dock, 173,244 Devil Worship, 208 DeWint’s Dock, 173 Diary of Abm. Hasbrouck, 170 Donnelly’s Recollections, 167 Downing House, 171 Druid Society (see Societies.) Eel-Fishing Place, 131 Edmonston House, 145 Elections, Early - 45,46 Elective Franchise, x 44 Ellison House, 146 Erie Canal Construction, 191 “ Railroad “ 194 Esopus Wars (see Aboriginal Era). Ettrick Grove., 214 Evans Patent (see Patents). Excise Commissioners, First Brick House, 173 . “ Frame House, 167 “ Mechanics, 173,265 “ Pest House, 175 “ Regular Store, 174 First Settlements. Baird Patent, 130 Bradley “ 131 Bradley Children Patent, 132 Goshen, etc., 35 Gulch Patent, 133 Haverstraw, 19 Harrison Patent, 132 Johnson Patent, 133 Kip & Co. Patent, 131 New Paltz, 20 Parish by Quassaick, 28 Plum Point (New Windsor), 21 SwartwoUt Patent, 25 Spratt “ . 133 Town of Orange, 23 Wawayanda Patent, Wallace “ 131 Forwarding Lines, 244 Forts Clinton, etci, 51,87,88,142 French and Indian War. Block Houses, 84 Hostilities of the Minsis, 81 Massacres in the Minnisinks, 82 Friends, Settlement of 131 Front Street, Opening of 201 Gardner’s Tavern, Gardner House, ' 209 Geology, etc. Champlain Division^ 73 Granite, 75 Minerals, 74,75 Mines, 76 Primary Rocks, 75 Shawangunk Grit, 72 Soils, etc.,. 78 Taconic System, 74 Trenton Limestone^ 73 German Patent, (see Patents.) Glebe, First Charter. 117 Amended Charter, 184 Difficulties, 160 Dwellings on 129,171 Fair, 125,126 Fee Simple-Titles, 204 First Minister, 119 Legal Controversy, 185 School (see Schools), Page 125 124 33 35 104 109 19,170 20 !,133 110 103 103 103 103 Glebe (continued). Second Charter, Tenants on Goshen, Precinct of Settlement of Town Boundaries, Greenville. Town Boundaries, Hamptonburgh, Town Boundaries, Hanover, Precinct of Hard Winter of 1779, .16 Harrison Patent (See Patents). Haverstraw, Settlement of Precinct of, Hessian Prisoners, Highlands, Forts’in (see Forts). Highlands (see Mountains). Highlands, Precinct of 36,12! Highlands, Town Boundaries, Hiram Lodge (See Masonic). Horses. American Star, Esopus Switph Tails, Hambletonian, Price of, Hotels. Mansion House, 177,181,200 Orange, 172,174 United States,' 174,201 Hudson’s River Obstructions, 87,88 Hudson and Delaware Canal, s 192 Independence. First Celebration of 154 Infidelity, 164 Introduction, 4 In the Beginning, 6 Judicial History, 31,32,43,93 Lacustrine and Marsh Lands. Barton Swamp, Big Swamp, Binnenwater Swamp, Black Meadow's, Cedar Swamp, Drowned Lands, Gray-court Meadows, Grassy S wamp, Great Swamp, Long Swamp, Pine Swamp, Pakadasink Swamp, Tamarack Swamp, Libraries. . Catholic Library, etc., Mechanics’ Library, Newburgh Library Assoc., “ Free Library, Liverpool Trade, ios Localities. Balmville, 206 Belknap’s Ridge, 211 Coldennam, 131,211 Dans Kamer, 9,206 DuBois’ Mills, 209 Gardnertown, 209 Gidneytown, 133,209 Hampton, 207 Hay Scales, 217 Luptondale, 131,208 . Middlehope, 132,206 New Mills,.’ 210 Powder Mills, 210 Public Stocks, 216 Public Market, 216 Rocky Forest, * 131,208 Rossville, 132,208,328 The Vale, 214 Washington’s Headquarters 215 West Newburgh, 210 Lunatic Asylum, 99 Luptondale (see Localities.) Maghaghkemek Patent, 25 Church, 90,101 Precinct, 36 Settlement of 25 Mailler’s Dock, 172,245 Mamakating Precinct (see Precinct Mansion House, 177,200 Masonic. American Union Lodge, 351 Hiram Lodge, 190,352 Newburgh Lodge, 352 Orange Lodge, Goshen, 352 Steuben Lodge, 351 St. John’s Lodge; Warwick, 352 Masonic Lodge Room, 175 Mastodon, 64 McIntosh House, 175,283,293,326 64 63 64 62 63 63 64 63 64 64,65 63 345 344 344 . 345Mechanical Industries. Pape Baking, 174,267 Brewing, 268 Brush Making, 271 Cabinet Making, 266 Carpenters and Masons, 271 Chair Making, 266 Earthen Ware, 266 Foundries, 270 Harness Making, 173,268 Hatting Business, 173,265 Painting, 268 Shoe Making, 265 Soap and Candles, 267,271 Statistics, 274 Stone-cutting, 267 Tailoring, 181,266 Tanning, 176,268 . Tin-smithing, 267 Tobacconists, 174,267 Wagon Making, 269 Watch Making, 266 Military Orga- izations. First Militia Co. —Muster Roll, 273 Organization of 1775, 85,273 Militia of Revolution, 85,274 Col. Hathorn’s Regiment,85,274 “ Wooodhull’s “ 85,274 “ Allison’s u 85,274 “ Ellison’s “ 85,273 “ Hasbrouck’s “ 85,274 “ Clinton’s “ 85,274 DuBois’ “ . 85,279 Rendezvous of 142,188 Services of 141,143 Muster Roll--Capt. Clark’s,, 275 “ Capt. Conkling’s, 275 Capt. Smith’s, 276 Special Organizations, 141,276 Belknap’s Rangers, 85,278 Minute Men, 85,141,287 Continental Regts.—First, 85,278 Col. DuBois’, 85,279 Uniforms, 280 Militia since the Revolution, 281 Service in War of 1812, 187 Service in War of 1862, 197,285 Orange Hussars, 281 Capt.. Acker’s Company, 281 Republican Blues, 282 Capt. Birdsall’s Companj, 282 Capt. Buttcrworth’s Co., Capt. Smith’s Company, Capt. Belknap’s . “. 283 Capt.. Falls’ “ 283 Bell-Button “ 283 Village Guard, Newburgh Volunteers, 284 Nineteenth Regiment, 286 Wash’glon Cont’ntal Guard,285 Powell Corps, , 285 Newburgh Guard, ' 285 Parmenter Riflemen, 285 Ellis Guard, Mills—Saw and Grist. Acker’s, 163,213 Belknap’s, \ 163 Burr’s, 163 Colden’s, 163,170,209 Denton’s, 163,170,213 DePeyster’s, 170 DuBois’, 209 Foster’s, . 163,210 Gardner’s, 163 Hartshorn’s, 163 1 Hasbrouck’s, 143,163,209 Machin’s Coinage Mill, 163,211 New Mills, 163,210 Niven’s, 163,210 Penny’s, 163 Schultz’s,. 171 Tooker’s,' 63 Minnisink Angle, 28 Battle of 90,189 Patent, h 1 26 Persohs Killed at 81 Population 1790, 41 Property Destroyed at 90 Purchase, 27 Town Boundaries, 105 Monroe, Town Poor House, 97 Town Boundaries, 104 (see Chesekook.) Montgomery, Precinct of Population 1790, 106 Town Boundaries, 41 Mount Hope. Town Boundaries, 107 GENERAL INDEX. Mountains and Valleys. Page Bear Mountain, 51 - Bell vale Mountains, 55 Bell vale Valley, 57 Blagg’s Clove, 57 Butter Hill, 50 Comfort Hills, etc.1, 56 Cro’-Nest, 1 51 Cronomer’s Hill, 214 Cfomeline Valley, 57 Dunderberg, 50 Eagle Valley. 58 Highland Range, 50 King’s Hill, 213 Limestone Hill, 214 Mount Independence, 51 Mt. Adam and Eve, 56 Mt. Lookout, 56 Muchattoes Hill, 55 Otterlcill Valley, 57 Peenpack Valley, 57 Pochuck Mountain, 55 Quassaick Valley, 57 Racoon Hill, 214 Ramapo Valley, 57,i Rough Mountains, 55 Schunemunk Range, 54 Shawangutilc Range, 52 Shawangunk Valley, 57 Smith’s Clove, 57,91 Southfield Mountains, 55 Sterling Mountainsj 55 Sugar-loaf Mountain, 56 Sugar-loaf Valley, 57 Taylor Mountains, 55 Torn Mountain, 51 The Vale, 214 Two-Pond Valley, 58 Wallkill Valley, 57 Warwick Mountains, 55 Winegtekonk, 55 Woodbury Clove, 57 Negro Slaves, 28,136 Newspapers and Serials. Acorn, The 349 Amateur Newspapers, 349 Beacon, The 348 Catholic Library Magazine, 349 Christian Instructor, 348 Christian Statesman, 348 Citizen, The 164,346 Evangelical Witness, 348 Family Visitor, 348 Home, Farm and Orchard, 349 Household Advocate, 349 Highland Courier, 348 Literary Scrap-Book, 349 Mirror, The 164,346 Musical Bulletin, National Advertiser, Newburgh American, 348 “ Dailv Democrat, 348 Daily Mail, 348 “ Excelsior, 348 “ Gazette, 347 “ . Journal, 347 Packet, 345,’46 “ Penny Post, 348 “ Telegraph, 347 Times 348 New Windsor Gazette, 164,346 Orange Co. Gazette, 164,346 Orange Co. Patriot, 347 Political Index, 164,346 Recorder of the Times, 164,346 Reformed Presbyterian, 348 Rights of Man, 164,346 Tablets of Rural Economy, 349 New Mills (see*Localities.) New Paltz, Settlement of 20,38 Convention at 135 New Marlborough, Precinct of 39 Population 1790, 41 New Windsor, Precinct of 38,133 Camp Ground at 144 Celebration at 152 Commerce of 158 First Settlement in, 21 Gazette (see Newspapers.) Public Building at 147 Town Boundaries, 105. Washington at 143 Neptune,' Sloop—Disaster to 247 Nursery, First Nursery, Downing’s Newburgh, City of, Location, 205 Academy, • 162,340 Celebration 1783, 153 423 Newburgh (continued), Page. Banking Institutiofis, 232 Business Review, 191 Census Returns, 218 Cochecton Turnpike, 202 Coffee House, 189,200 City Boundaries, 110 City, Organization of 198 Commercial Record, 245 Committee of Safety, 135,137,138 Dedication of Streets, 159 Disbandment of Rev. Army, 157 Ferry, 122,126,250 Fire Department, 163,253 Fires, 261 First Town Election, 133,134 General Summary, 199 j Glebe Charter (see Glebe). Incorporated Companies, 237 Whaling Company. 237 Steam Mills, 238 .! Gas:Light Company, 239 Infidelity, -164 Letters, 147 Mechanical Industries, 265 Military Organizations, 273 Militia Companies, 141,275,281 •Mission, 130 Newburgh House, 173,199 Newburgh in 1609, 111 Newburgh, Parish of 125 Old Town Plot, 33,121,126,158,159 Origin of Name, 206 Palatine Settlement, 113 Patents in Town, 112 Poverty of the People, 157 Precinct of 38,39,112,133 Poor System, 220 Post Office, 243 Quassaick. Parish by 115 Railroad Enterprises, 228 Reception of La Fayette* 190 Recollections of Jas.Donnelly 167 Second War with England, 187 Regatta Association; 263 Revolutionary Events, 134 “ Pledge, Signers of 136 Settlement of Patents, 130 Supply of water, 239 Town Boundaries, 39,105 Township of Washington, 159 Turnpikes and Plank-roads, 222 Village, Incorporation of 164,183 Village, Original 164 War of the Rebellion, 197,287 Oakley & Davis’ Dock. 172,245 Obstructions to Navigation, 88,90 Odd Fellows Lodges. 352 Orange County Poor House, 97,220 Orange Hotel (see Hotels). Orange Lake (see Ponds). Orangetown, Precinct of 35 Orange, Town of 23,35 Palatinate of the Rhine, 113 Palatines in England, 114 “ Removal to America, 114 “ Settlement of 28,119 Palmer’s Lead Mines,. 214 Parsonage, First 128 Patents. Baird’s, 112,130 Bradley, 112,131,208 Bradley Children, 112,132 Chesekook, 26 Evans, 22,112 German, 26,118 Gulch, 113,132 Harrison, 112,132 Haverstraw, 19 Johnson, 113,133 Kakaite, 24 Kip & Co., 112,131,208 Minnisink, 26,28 Minnisink Angle, 28,61 New Paltz, 20 Penny, 132,208 Quaspeeck, 24 Schuyler’s, 24 Spratt, 113,133,209 Swartwout’s, 25 Wallace, 113,132 Wawayanda, 26,28 Patent Lines, 27,61,65 Peace Negotiations, 147 Penny Patent (see Patents). Petition for St, George’s church, 130 “ for more Currency, 157 “ for more Taverns, 129424 GENERAL INDEX, 61 69 21,61,65 62,211 213 Plank-roads. Page. Newburgh and Ellenville, 196,222 Newb. and Shawangunk; 196,123 Politics, Colonial 44 “ Local, 187,193,197 Ponds and Lakes. Big Pond, Binnenwater, Bog-meadow Pond, Bull Pond, Car Pond, Cedar Pond, Cedar Pond, No. 2, Cranberry Pond, No. 1, Cranberry Pond, No. 2, Fitzpatrick’s Pond, Greenwood Lake, Green Pond, Hazzard’s Pond, Little Long Pond, No. 1, Little Long Pond, No. 2, Little Pond, Long Pond, Maretange Pond, Mombasha Pond, Nigger Pond, Orange Lake, Poll Rose’s Pond, Poplopen’s Pond, Round Pond, oi Round Pond, No. 1, 59 Round Pond, No. 2, 59 Round Island Pond, 60 Slaughter’s Pond, 59 Spruce Pond, ' 59 Sterling Lake, 60 Summit Lake, 59 Sutherland’s Pond, 59 Thompson’s Pond, 61 Truxedo Pond, 60 Two Ponds, 59 Washington Lake, 62 Wickham’s Pond, 61 Population,Precinct Highlands 218 Newburgh, 41,219 Orange County, 28*41 Character of 100 General Reference, 103,133,162 Powder Mills (see Localities). Presbyterian Church (see Church) Precincts. Goshen, 35 Hanover, 39 Haverstraw, 35 Highlands, 36,122,133,218 Maghaghkemek, 36 Mamakating, 35,38 Newburgh, • 38,133 New Marlborough, 38,133 36 35 36 37,39 122,130,184,192 95 119 New Windsor, New Cornwall, Orangetown, Shawangunk, Wallkill, Price of Lands, Prisoners for Debt, Private Residences, Progress of Settlement, Quartermaster’s Stores, Quassaick Creek (see Streams), Quit-rents, Railroads. Crawford and Erie, • Duchess and Columbia, Hudson and Delaware, Montgomery and Erie, Pine Island and Erie, Monticello and Port Jervis, 195 Newburgh Branch, 195,226 Warwick Branch, Newburgh and Midland, Newburgh and New York,195,230 Newburgh and Wallkill Yal. 231 New Jersey Midland, 195 195 196 194,223 195 195 Railroads (continued). Page. New York and Erie, 194,221 Oswego Midland, . 195 Unionville Branch, 195 ’ Wallkill Valley, 195 Ramsdell’s Dock, 172,245 Rebellion Record, 197 Recollections, Donnelly’s 167 Red Store-house, 202 Renwick City, Revolutionary War. 84,134 Revolutionary Army. Encampment of 144 Discontent in 145 Disbandment of 156 Honorary Badges, 156 Rocky Forest (see Localities). Ross House, Rossville (see Localities). Ruggles House, Second War with England. Chesapeake and Shannon, Dartmoor Prisoners, Military Movements, 188 Perry’s Victory, Supply of Clothing, 188 Salt, Scarcity of 175 Scheneetady Massacre, 25 School-house, First 128 Schools Glebe School, 125,128,160,161,338 Newburgh Academy, 162,340 “ High Scntol, 342 “ Free Schools, 342 Private Schools, 343 Theological Seminary, 336 Scotch-English Settlers, 122 Ship Building, 163,176 Small Pox, First Case of 175 Societies. Bible Society, Newburgh Druids, The 165,175 Historical Society, 350 Home for the Friendless, 350 Horticultural Society, 264 Lyceum Association, 349 Lyceum of Natural Sciences, 349 Masonic Lodges, 351 Mission Society, 350 Mutual Improvement Soc., 350 New England Society, 360 Odd Fellows, 352 Sabbath School Society, .350 S.Luke’s Home and Hospital, 351 Temperance, etc., 352 Young Men’s Christ. Assoc., 351 Soldiers, Billeting of . 142 Stage Lines, 191 Steamers, Newburgh 201,248 Steamboat Captains, 249 St. George’s Church (see Churches) Stony Point, Attack on 144 Streets, Dedication of 127 Streams and Water Courses. Acker’s Creek, ^ 213 Arackhook, Basha’s Kill, Bushfleld Creek, 69,213 Canterbury Brook, 68 Cold Spring, 213 Cromeiine Creek, Delaware River, 64,70 Denton’s Creek, 213 Fall Brook, 66 Fostertown Creek, 69,112 Goldsmith Creek, 69 Hudson’s River, 6,64.70 Ledyard’s Spring, 213 Long-house Creek, 67 Little Pakadasink River, 21,65,70 Little Shawangunk Kill, 65 McCorlin’s Kill, 67 Mongaup River, 64,65 Monhagen Creek, 67 70 68 213 67 100 128 ',168 173 181 173 203 181 Streams and Water Courses (cont). Muddy Kill, 68 Murderer’s Creek, 69 Neversink River, 66,70 Otterkill, • 68 Pakadasink River, 21,65,70 Pochuck Creek, 67 Poplopen’s Creek, 70 Powelton Brook, 213 Powelton Spring, 213 Quaker Creek, 67 Quassaick Creek, 69,212 Tent Stone Meadow Creek, 69,212 Queensborough Brook, 70 Ramapo River, 70 Rutger’s Creek, 67 Shawangunk Kill, 64,65 Schunemunk Creek, Sickbosten’s Kill, Tinn Brock, Trout Brook, Wallkill River. Wawayanda Creek, Woodbury^ Creek, Swartwout Bhtent, Supervisors,?First Board Taverns, Petition for Albertson’s, Blue Bell, Case’s, DeGrove’s, Gardner’s, Howell’s, Number of Smith’s, Weigand’s, Temperance Societies, Theological Seminary, Tories and Indians, Town Boundaries, . Trade and Commerce,177,’91,’95,244 Tufnpikes. ' Newburgh and Cochecton 184,196 Newburgh & NewWindsor 186,196 Newburgh and Sullivon, 186,196 Newburgh and Platiekill, 186,196 Newburgh and Ulster, 196 Snake Hill, 196 United States Hotel (see Hotels). Vaughan and Wallace Exp., • 142 Wagon Street, 118 Wallkill Precinct (see Precinct). Town Boundaries, 109 Wallkill Road, 118 Wallace Patent (see Patents). War of the Revolution. Battle of Minnisink, Burgoyne’s Expedition, Cow Boys, General Summary, Highland Forts, Indian Hostilities, Military Organizations, Pledge of Association, WAr, Second with England War of the Rebellion, Wars.of Louis XIV, Warwick Town Boundaries, Washington, General. Barges of Betrayal of Farewell Orders, 1129,167,176 352 190 91,96 103 91 89.142 93 88.143 90 86,274 85,136 188 197 113 105 litlCVVCll VJUC19, 156 Heac-quarters of .143,144,154,215 Letter to Congress, 151 Life Guard, 145,170 Newburgh Letters, 148 Order for Celebration, 152 Reply to Nicola, 145 Washington, Mrs. 155,170 Wawayanda Patent (see Patent). Town Boundaries, 109 Western Trade, 191,192 Westfall’s Fort 83 West India Trade, 177 miMinimmMiimiHnmimimiimm^ngrabiftgs. Aborginal Map ...................... .Facing Page 5 Adolph DeGrove (Autograph),................383 Adolph DeGrove, Jr. (Autograph)............ 383 American Reformed Church.....................317 Asbury Chapel.............................. 328. Associate Reformed Church................. 313 Calvary Presbyterian Church................- 306 Colden House............:.............:....173 County Seal...........................Title Page. County of Orange (Map)..........Facing Page 35 Court House at Newburgh............... .... . 98 Gro’-Nest................................ 50 David Crawford (Portrait)................... 396 Disbandment of the Army..........Facing Page 157 DuBois’Mills............................ 209 Engine No. 2................ .............. 258 Enoch Carter (Portrait)......................385 Ferry Boat Caravan .. .....................— 253 First Baptist Church (1796)................. 320 First Baptist Church (1850)................... 322 First Baptist Church (I860)..... .......... 322 First M. E. Church (1860)—.... ............ 327 First Presbyterian Church‘(1828)............ 300 First Presbyterian Church (1858). .......... 301 First Reformed Presbyterian Church......... 311 Fostertown M. E. Church.................. 329 Gardner House..... —;......................209 Gardner’s Store House...........Facing Page 247 Gardnertown M. E. Church ...................... 328 German Patent (Map)........................... 118 Gilbert O. Fowler (Portrait)...............369 Glebe, Map of (1753).............^Facing Page 127 Gray-Court Meadows . . . —...............63 Hay Scales............................. 217 Home for the Friendless ...................351 Homer Ramsdell (Portrait), Steel.. Facing Page 403 Homestead of Thomas Powell (Steel) “ “ 183 Homestead of Thomas Powell (Steel) “ “ 225 Hudson Trading with Indians................ 8 Hugh Walsh (Autograph).................... — .381 Indian Devil Worship.......................207 James M. Gardiner (Portrait).................388 Jonathan Carter (Autograph)............... 384 Jonathan Fisk (Portrait). .................• 391 Joseph Hoffman (Portrait) ..................... 388 Lawson and Columbian Hose House, Facing Page 256 Lutheran Church............................ 120 Maringoman’s Castle......................... 55 Middlehope Presbyterian Church.............— 310 I Minnisink Monument (Steel)..Facing Title Page~ MosesH. Belknap (Portrait)................362 Newburgh Academy..........................341 Newburgh in 1609......................... 111. Newburgh from the North-West.... Facing Page 111 Newburgh Patents (Map).................... 112 - Newburgh from the North-East. ...Facing Page 205- Newburgh from the South-East..............202 Newburgh Market........................... 217 Newburgh Savings Bank...................... 236* Newburgh Alms-House.............Facing Page 221 Newburgh City, Seal of.......................420 Odell S. Hathaway (Portrait).................405 Parsonage, First--------------------------- 128 Patents, Map of.................Facing Page 27 Phineas Bowman (Portrait)................... 390 Plateau at Cornwall....................... 79- Public Stocks and Whipping Post..............2L6 Ramsdell’s Store-house...............Facing Page 247 Ringgold Hose House.............Facing Page 257. Ross House ............_—.............. .. 208 Rossville M.E. Church....................... 329 Ruins of Fort Putnam............Facing Page 92 Samuel Parmenter (Autograph).................410 School House* First—.........................128 Second Presbyterian Church.....:........... 303 Second Reformed Presbyterian Church..........314 Selah Reeve (Autograph)... ..................376 Steamer Baltimore.......................... 248 St. George’s Episcopal Church.............. 293 Sterling Mines............................ 77 Sugar-Loaf Mountain.......................... 56 Thomas Powell (Portrait), Steel—Facing Page 353 Torn Mountain—. .. .................. 51 Township of Washington (Map)....... — .... 159 Trinity M. E. Church............Facing Page 327 Universalist Church.............—............ 334- Union Associate Reformed Church..............308 Union Presbyterian Church........Facing Page 308 View from Fort Montgomery.................... 51 Washington’s Head-quarters.......Facing Page 215 Washington Engine......................... 256 Ward, Leonard & Co.’s Store........ — . —... 269 Water Street from Golden’s Gore............ —199* Weigand’s Tavern (1767)— - — ............. 129. Weigand’s Tavern (1780)..................... 176 Wm. W. Belknap (Portrait), Steel... .FacingPage 360 William DeGrove (Autograph)............... 383 William K. Mailler (Portrait) ............. 391BEFORE ALTERATION.AFTER ALTERATION.UNION PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH-1876.