Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39.48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Pres- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1992.CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH .THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY * • HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE ■>THE HISTORY OF CAPE COD. ANNALS OF THE THIRTEEN TOWNS OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. BY FREDERICK FREEMAN. VOL. II. “ These transactions and events, as they precisely fell out in time, too much neglected by our historians, I have taken the greatest pains to search and find, even more than in the composing; and which, through a world of difficulty and much expense, I here present you.”—Rev. Thomas Prince. BOSTON: W. H. PIPER & CO. Chicago, III. : S. C. Griggs & Co. 1869. YEntered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1862, by Geo. C. Rand & Avery, In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.PREFACE. The writing of a preface has usually been postponed by authors to the close of their work —just as is the practice of some clergymen to write their sermon and then select an ap- propriate text: but we choose that the preface precede the narrative not only in the order of arranging the sheet for the bindery, but in the order of time, as a programme or exhibit of what we sincerely intend to do and as the utter- ance of what we have to say in advance of the execution. How far we redeemed our pledge given in the preface to the former volume, is for the public and posterity to decide. "We had, before we commenced the publication, assiduously gath- ered materials as far as was practicable from sources more readily at command as well as from almost obliterated and widely scattered data; and, as the issue of the work progressed, carefully and indefatigably searched for other data wherever there seemed a probability or even possibility of its being found for the coin- (3)4 PREFACE. pletion of our narrative. The labor necessary, very few persons are competent to appreciate; for only they who have had like experience can estimate it. The difficulties of historical re- search always increase with the remoteness or obscurity of the period; and secluded settle- ments where the springs of important transac- tions lie thinly scattered are generally most neglected. Suffice to say, we have stinted our- self neither in diligent inquiry, wearisome re- search, nor expense. We might, it is true, have incurred — and our true policy, so far as pecu- niary self-interest dictated, would have been to incur — less expense in the exterior or mechan- ical execution: but if we chose to gratify our own taste at serious cost in the paper, typogra- phy and embellishments, our readers were not the losers. The policy will be the same in the present volume. We never had any absurd expectation of pecuniary emolument from the History. Nor have we been chiefly ambitious of fame; or we would have selected other sub- jects, and eras prolific of remarkable incidents and distinguished for the magnitude of their events. Our humble aim was, and still is, to rear a monument to the past and perform an act of filial and patriotic regard for Cape Cod — our endeared natale solum. On entering upon this second volume, we would fain have the reader advised in somePREFACE. •5 degree of the arduous nature of our undertaking. Were we writing a History of the United States, or even of the World, it would be comparatively a lighter task; for we would then be called to deal chiefly in generalities, travelling over ground explored again and again by able men, the abun- dant data at hand, our pen moving with few inter- ruptions, currente calamo, and our principal anxi- ety not to fall too far below those preceding us — whether in correct narrative, interest of arrange- ment and illustration, or diction: but our task is to pioneer in an attempt to rescue from ob- livion the fading memories of by-gone years and to snatch from the relentlessly destructive tooth of time records that have already become in part mutilated or illegible — the history of a portion of country that has received from his- torical writers hitherto scarcely any attention. All are familiar with the homely simile, “ a needle in a hay-stack; ” we have (to follow out the figure) spent many tedious hours in almost as hopeless a search — examining as it were many a stack straw by straw — the result often being only the demonstration that the object of search was not there. When a fact of any mo- ment or even the simplest incident tending to throw light upon the past has been found, we have seized it with avidity and scrutinized it with care — to proceed again in our search. Nothing accessible, of the existence of which we were aware and which gave hope of addi- tional light, has been left unexplored.6 PREFACE. Dr. Johnson, the great lexicographer, has de- fined one of his vocation, “ a writer of diction- aries— a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original and detailing the significa- tion of words: ” we sympathize Avith him in the feeling that prompted the self-pitying and self- humiliating soliloquy. We do not expect either the present or coming generations to appre- hend fully the pains which our undertaking costs. The work accomplished, future explorers will profit by our toils. They will have at least some faint landmarks by which to direct their own course, and possibly may detect some omis- sions and supply deficiencies, some errors and correct them; the initiate toil they will happily have avoided, and can, therefore, never know the perplexities that attended it. We discourse on this wise not that we may find sympathy; but that our position may be so far understood that none may imagine that the humble offering here made to the public is ac- complished by sinecure, or is reasonably to be demanded as the work of a moment. True, were all the difficulties of the way perfectly compre- hended, the phlegmatic might coolly retort, ‘ Cai bono t the task was voluntarily assumed. If, tenacious of the example of “ Old Mortality ” among the monuments, a writer chooses so thank- less employment, he has the privilege conceded to him of consuming in the self-profitless taskPREFACE. 7 energies that might be better directed; and, though he may find occasion to apostrophize the ancient peninsula of his nativity with the lamentation, “The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up,” he has his labor for his pains.’ All this may seem to morbid indifference very pertinent; and, so far from complaining, we ourself freely admit — and as the result of ex- perience unhesitatingly record the confession — that were one looking to us for advice, to inti- mate the thought of preparing the history of a county and its several towns with the aid of so scattered, confused and almost obliterate mate- rials, — adding to this the severer duty of demon- strating what was the origin of each man, what the line of descent of this, that or the other, or even the fact that every one was actually born of some parent, — we would be somewhat inclined to chide the temerity. And yet, whilst we thus confess, we are by no means unthankfully ob- livious to the fact that both pleasure and en- couragement have been found in the prosecution of our labors. Sincere, ay, most heart-felt thanks are due to those who have evinced an interest in our success. The readiness of such, including not a few of wisdom and high position, to succor the enterprise, is gratefully remembered, and will at the proper time and in appropriate place at the conclusion of this volume be duly and particularly acknowledged. We may add — it is hoped without incurring any gratuitous8 PREFACE. charge of egotism — that as one of Cape Cod’s noblest sons undertook, nearly a century and a half ago, to rescue colonial events that in their order were becoming involved in obscurity,1 and Morton, at an earlier period, performed a similar task, the efforts of neither being now lightly valued; so this attempt to snatch from the wreck of time what is memorable in almost three centuries since the discovery of Cape Cod, we confidently believe, will be regarded with favor by future generations. In the following pages the towns will be taken up in the order of settlement or incorpora- tion. If in the annals of the towns that precede, some matters of general public interest are re- cited that were at the same time similarly enacted in the other towns, it will not be ex- pected that, when we come to the annals of the latter, the record of such transactions shall be repeated in extenso. Reference only will be made to them where the action was the same. 1 See, on title page, extract from Rev. Thomas Prince’s preface to New England Chronology ; and read in connection, the record of the Mass. Hist. Soc. two or three generations after : “ The Annals of New England, which have preserved many valuable materials of the early history of the colonies, which but for the labors of their indus- trious author would have been irretrievably lost. Posterity, to whom the principles, feelings, habits, and sufferings of the planters of New England will be interesting objects of contemplation, will lament that the neglect of the contemporaries of this gentleman prevented him from bringing his work to a conclusion.” His second volume was never published.PREFACE. 9 This is not only necessary to prevent the tedium of sameness, but to gain room for what remains. As time advances and settlements multiply, the narrative of each will, of course, be lessened, according to the extent of years which their history covers. If our narrative is chronological and a variety of incidents are recorded that are not only merely local but transitory in their effects, still this method and relation are necessary; the order must be seen, and, though often trifling in and of themselves, the incidents are too im- portant to be omitted, inasmuch as they indicate as nothing else can the condition of things at the moment and the progress being made. There has ever been a disposition among historical writers to lose sight of the sparsely peopled and scattered settlements — the remoter towns, villages, and by-ways; and to concen- trate all the interest of their pages on cities and their inhabitants: the effect of these pages will be, we think, at least to suggest the question, What were the city without the country? what the most flaming zeal without the j7eomanry of the land ? what the patriotism of a few whose names have come to be quoted with no recogni- tion of others without the encouragement and support derived from patriots around? what were even a Washington without a soldiery and vol. n. 210 PREFACE. the back-bone and cool determination and fer- vent love of liberty that made up the aggregate from a whole community ? Cities alone have always been comparatively impotent in great emergencies, except, peradventure, as the hot- beds of riots and mobs. The vox populi is, in an important sense, the voice of God. How much the blessings of civil and religious free- dom, the security and perpetuity of free in- stitutions, and the suggesting and sustaining influences of wise counsels and determined sup- port, are attributable to men and positions un- acknowledged, were a question of great import. In speaking of individuals, sects, or parties, we hold ourself morally bound by the promise always virtually implied by the very profession of history — to give a true narrative of events, presenting no man, sect, or party, from malice, hatred, or envy, and leaving none unpresented through fear, favor, affection, or hope of reward; exhibiting truly all public transactions as they come to our knowledge, so far as is essential to the ends of history. Although were we setting forth a work for the mere amusement of the reader we might, did our judgment approve, relate very many anecdotes and incidents of men and times, neither important to history nor suited to its true dignity; we can only be true whether to self-respect or duty in the compilation of these pages, by discarding all such unworthyPREFACE. 11 temptation. Enough is known of the foibles of human nature, without individuation; and transient weaknesses that ought not to obscure the general reports of fame, may be developed even by exalted characters. Personal differ- ences, political animosities, religious dissen- sions, are all “ enough for life’s woe” at the time of them, without being transferred to stand as if sculpture on the tombs of the departed, to prejudice the eyes of the surviving. This last utterance would appear superfluous, were it not that the diversity of education, taste, and judgment, found among men, might, without such intimation, expect us to yield to other suggestions. We wish to have it dis- tinctly understood that we have no desire in any respect to realize the experience of Polycletus in the statue which he executed according to the fancy of every one who chanced in his studio. In furnishing genealogical notices, we some- what exceeded in our first volume the limits we had originally intended; but, notwithstanding the labor required in this department, we are still disposed to use the great amount of data we have with much care collected, to give a full view of descent from original settlers generally. Let it be understood, however, that if we find it more convenient, such notices may in many instances be deferred to the close of this volume;12 PREFACE. and in. cases unimportant, and especially those of them in which in addition the blood rake no manner of interest in their progenitors, we may defer such notices altogether. We have but one other remark to make, and that, inasmuch as the pertinency of our pro- nouncing this preface a programme, may not otherwise be understood by such as shall only see the work when complete in bound volumes, is: the issuing of it in numbers, or parts, as hitherto, and at intervals, is the result of confirmed con- viction that this method has advantages essen- tial to completeness and accuracy. Saitdwich, April 1, 1862.CONTENTS Faob PREFACE..................................................3 ANNALS OF SANDWICH,.....................................13 YARMOUTH,...................................171 BARNSTABLE,.................................241 EASTHAM,....................................345 FALMOUTH,...................................415 HARWICH,....................................489 TRURO,......................................533 CHATHAM,....................................577 PROVINCETOWN,...............................615 WELLFLEET,..................................651 DENNIS,.....................................687 ORLEANS,....................................719 BREWSTER,...................................737 ADDENDA,...............................................769 CONCLUSION,............................................777 SUBSCRIBERS, LIST OF,..................................781 INDEX, Subjects,.......................................787 Names,........................................ 792 Indians,........................................802 Indian Places,..................................803 ERRATA,................................................804ILLUSTRATIONS 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. William Bodfish, William Fessenden, Zeno Scudder, . . . Benjamin F. Hallett, Braddock Dimmick, . Thomas Fish, . . . Elijah Swift, . . . Samuel Lewis, . . . Thomas Swift, . . . John Jenkins, . . . Salathiel Nickerson, Elijah Cobb, . . . Ebenezer Nickerson, Isaac Clark, . . . Amasa Nickerson, Benjamin Burgess, . Isaiah Crowell, . . To face page . . 142 . . 155 . . 338 . . 340 . . 479 . . 478 . . 480 . . 482 . . 483 . . 484 . . 611 . . 764 . . 769 . . 771 . . 772 . . 773 . . 775THE ANNALS OF THE TOWN OP SANDWICH “It is wisb bob us to bxcub to thb histobt or oub ancestors. Those who do hot LOOK UPON THEMSELVBSA3 A LINK CONNECTING THB PAST WITH THB FUTURE, DO NOT PERFOBK thbib duty to thb WORLD.” — Daniel Webster. (13)Inscription We can think of no more appropriate Inscription of the Annals of THIS OUR NATIVE TOWN, THAN IN MEMORY OF THE RIGHT REVEREND GEORGE WASHINGTON FREEMAN, D.D., LATE MISSIONARY BISHOP OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESES OF ARKANSAS AND TEXAS; WHO, EMINENTLY UNITING WITH THE PIETY WHICH BECOMES A PRELATE, THE LEARNING OF A SCHOLAR AND THE COURTESY OF A GENTLEMAN, WAS AN ORNAMENT TO HIS PROFESSION: ALIKE BELOVED AND REVERED IN LIFE, AND IN DEATH LAMENTED BY THOUSANDS WHO HAD ENJOYED THE PLEASURE OF HIS ACQUAINTANCE; BUT BY NONE BELOVED, RESPECTED, OR LAMENTED MORE SINCERELY THAN BY HIS BROTHER, THE AUTHOR. (14) ANNALS OF SANDWICH A grant having been made, April 3, 1637, “ to Mr. Edmund Freeman and nine associates” who had for some time previous been residents of Lynn, (Saugus,) * the same year these ten men of Saugus,” viz: were, with the exception of Dexter, who came subse- quently, early on the ground. With them, or soon after, came also a large number of persons chiefly from Lynn, Duxbury, and Plymouth, viz: 1 Mr. Almy left town early, and prob. went to It. Island. It has been supposed that John of Portsmo., who was a capt. in Philip’s war, was his son. Of the correctness of this last suggestion, we express no opinion. * Whether this was the distinguished author of ‘New England’s Pros- pect,* pr. Lond. 1634, is, in the opinion of some, an open question. Mr. Lewis, author of the History of Lynn, represents Mr. Wood as coming to Lynn in 1629—admitted May 18, 1631, a townsman — a resident there 4 yrs. during which time he wrote New England’s Prospect — sailed Aug. 15, 1633, for Lond., where he pub. his book 1634, and in 1635 his Map of New Eng. engraved — the same year returning to Lynn, having embarked Sept. 11 in the Hopewell, Graves master, accompanied by his wife Elizabeth 24 yrs. of age, and he 27, according to the record in Westminster Hall—in 1636 a deputy — and in 1637 going with a qpmpany of about 50 men to Sandwich, and here is Town Clerk, active, intelligent, talented. All this is sufficiently circumstantial: we shall have occasion to refer to the subject again by and by. 3 Mr. Carman does not long appear an inhab. of S. But Mr. Savage mistakes in supposing that he d. in 1638 ; for he had lands granted him m S. 1640 and 1641. It is prob. that he went to Long Island and was the patentee of Hampstead where his son Caleb’s baptism was the first rite of the kind administered. Edmund Freeman, Henry Feake, Richard Chadwell, William Almy,1 Thomas Tupper, William Wood,2 Edward Dillingham, John Carman,3 George Knott, and Thomas Dexter, (15)16 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY, George Allen, Thomas Armitage,1 Anthony Besse, Mr. Blakemore,2 George Bliss,3 Thomas Boardman,4 Robert Bodfish, Richard Bourne, William Bray brook,5 John Briggs,3 George Buitt, Thomas Burge, Thomas Butler, Tho. Chil lings worth,7 Edmund Clarke,8 George Cole,9 John Dingley,10 Henry Ewer, John Fish, Jonathan Fish, Nathaniel Fish, John Friend,11 Peter Gaunt, Andrew Hallett,12 Thomas Hampton,13 William Harlow,14 William Hedge,16 Joseph Hoi way, William Hurst,16 John Joyce,17 1 Mr. Armitage had lands gr. in 1641, but his name soon disappears. It is supposed that he returned to Lynn. 2 Mr. Blakemore, or Blackmore as generally written, was doubtless John who was appointed to exercise the militia in 1639. After the mention of him as liable to bear arms in 1643, his name disappears from the records. 3 Mr. Bliss had lands in S. 1641, and perhaps is, as one suggests, the same who, in 1649, was “ empowered to mend arms ” at Newport. But he was certainly in S. at a later period, as will be seen. 4 Mr. Boardman, from Lond., was in Plym. 1634, remained in S. sever- al years, had gr. of lands 1641, but. in 1643 was following the occupation of a carpenter in Yarmouth. 5 Mr. Braybrook is last known as having lands in S. 1641, and may be of the same family that subsequently appears in York. 6 Mr. Briggs came over 1635 an. 20. His estate was ad. on by his widow Catharine, June 1, 1641. His will mentions s. Samuel and dr. Sarah. 7 Mr. Chillingsworth, oftener Shillingsworth in the records, had lands 1641, and was liable to bear arms in S. 1643 ; but soon went to Marshfield, where he was deputy 1648 and 1652, and died 1653 leaving a wife and children. 8 Of Mr. Clarke we are certain of nothing more than that he had lands assigned to him in 1641. 9 Mr. Cole had lands 1641; but, as Mr. Savage says “he d. about 1653, his inv. being in Lynn June 28 of that yr., it is prob. that he went back to the latter place. A Henry Cole was in S. liable to bear arms 1643, who, Mr. Savage says, went to Connecticut. 10 Mr. Dingley went to Marshfield 1644, and d. 1658 leaving a family. 11 Mr. Friend had lands in S. 1641, but prob. went to Ct. and was a sol- dier in the Pequot war. 12 Mr. Hallett had lands in S., and soon went to Yarm. In 1640, June 28, “ Andrew Hallett of Sandwich ” conveyed certain property in S. to Daniel Wing — the instrument being witnessed by John Wing and Edw. Dillingham. 13 Mr. Hampton d. abt. 1638, and prob. had no family. His will, March 1637, makes Mr. Leverich, Thos. Shillingsworth, Thos. Tupper, Peter Gaunt, ltd. Kerby, and Wm. Harlot, legatees. 14 Mr. Harlow who came to S. from Lynn, had lands in S. 1641. He af- terwards removed to Plym. He m. Hebecca dr. of Rt. Bartlett, Dec. 20, 1649, and had William 1650, &c. &c. 15 This Mr. Hedge is probably the same that is written Mr. Edge, Vol. I. p. 164, and removed to Yarmouth. 16 Mr. Hurst m. Catharine Thurston, March 17, 1640, and d. 1640. His wid. ad. his est. June 1. 17 Mr. Joyce went to Yarmouth 1643.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 17 Richard Kerby, John King, Thomas Landers, Mr. Leverich, John Miller,1 William Newland, Benjamin 1ST ye, Mr. Potter,2 3 James Skiffe, George Slawson, Michael Turner, John Vincent,8 Richard Wade,4 * 6 * Thomas Willis, John Wing, Mr. Winsor,* Mr. Wollaston,* Anthony Wright, Nicholas Wright, and Peter Wright. A large proportion of these brought families with them. The settlement thus begun was not indeed the very first, as we have seen, Vol. I. p. 113; but to what ex- tent the plantation at Manomet had grown before this time, we have no certain means of ascertaining: it had probably remained as it was in 1627 — a merely tem- porary trading-establishment and depot for merchan- dise in transitu. In 1638, a church appears to have been already gathered in Sandwich, and Mr. William Leverich was at the time, or soon after, the pastor. Considerable changes in the population at a very early period, are indicated — some removing to other parts, and others coming in to supply their places: but the names of some fifteen of the earliest settlers, have, with the addition of a few others soon succeed- ing, been the prevailing patronymics to the present day. It will be noticed that we may not claim for our native town that its settlement was projected by those who have usually been denominated par excellence 1 the 1 Mr. Miller had lands in S. 1641, but was soon after in Yarmouth. * Mr. Potter, probably Robert, had lands 1641. 3 Mr, Vincent was of S. as late as 1657 when he m. Mary Matthews and probably soon removed to Yarmouth. 4 Mr. Wade disappears after 1641. 6 Joseph Winsor appears many years upon the records; but John is probably the man here intended. 6 See Mr. Wollaston, Vol. I. p. 165. A deed now in the possession of Solomon Freeman Esq. of Brewster, dated Dec. 30, 1649, from “ Thos. Dexter of Sandwich, in the Govt, of New Plym., in New Eng., in America,” to John Freeman, describes the conveyance on this wise: “ lands next to the lands of Edmund Freeman Sr. gent. — meadow formerly the land of Edward Wollaston late inhabitant of Sandwich.” yol. n. 318 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Pilgrims.' The early settlers here were, in fact, gen- erally, in some respects, a different order of men: •— all, probably, ‘ non-conformists ’ and ‘ puritans; ’ and it is also probable that religious considerations had much to do with the emigration of the chief of them. They were, however, we have reason to conclude, not unlike mankind at the present day, led by the spirit of adven- ture without being then or subsequently bent on the establishment of a theocracy. Although they were generally of the number wafted hither by that tide of emigration that caused fleets to be in requisition for the accommodation of the thousands who would migrate and assayed to locate in another colony; they had, after observation and reflection, arrived at the conclu- sion that the Plymouth Colony would, on the whole, be congenial and present as few obstacles to the con- summation of their aspirations, as the Massachusetts. England had, long before the embarkation of ‘ the Leyden Pilgrims,’ been on the tip-toe of expectation; and every report from these shores had, from the days of Gosnold, Pring, Champlain, Weymouth, Popham, Smith, been scrutinized by capitalists and adventurers. Especially had the description Smith gave of ‘ New England ’ — accompanied by a map, and published in 1616, suggested, as he designed, projects for colonizing. His more general history of Virginia and New Eng- land, did not abate the interest that had already been awakened. The charters granted to different compa- nies before the sailing of the Mayflower, the one in 1606 and the other in 1620, clearly disclose the movings of the public mind. In fact, the settlement at James- town in 1607, was but the result of a feeling long cherished; for, twenty years previous, attempts had been made to establish a colony under the patronage of Raleigh; and the attempt, the same year of theANNALS OP SANDWICH. 19 settlement on James River, to plant a colony on the Kennebeck, is another illustration of the prevalent spirit of adventure. The Dutch patent granted in 1614, proves how wide-spread was this adventurous spirit at an early day. The success of those who took precedence in establishing the New Plymouth Colony .— as commended by Bradford and Winslow, and in after years by the publication of Wood’s New England Prospect embracing the Massachusetts Colony, very naturally led to further results ; and as favorable intelligence continued to be received in England from time to time through letters from these colonies, mer- chants, capitalists, and others felt the inspiration and associations for emigration began to multiply. The ‘ non-conformists ’ were largely inclined to make the trial: tut the thought of emigration was by no means confined to them; as is evidenced by the pres- ence of Morrill in Gorges’ settlement, of Lyford and Oldham at Nantasket, and of the Browns among the original patentees under Endicott. In the first emigration to Plymouth, were “ but few persons of capital: ” but those who came to Massachu- setts, were, in numerous instances, men of property as well as of standing.1 In preferring the Plymouth Colony, after a short trial of the other, the original settlers of Sandwich could not have been influenced by the ex- pectation of a more extended franchise, for the privilege was in both colonies confined to “ the elect,” and the style of legislating was in perfect lAeping with this principle in both; nor was it the assurance that severity 1 “ The Pilgrim Fathers,” by Bartlett, London, says, “ The circumstances attending the settlement of Massachusetts were widely different from those under which the colony of the pilgrims struggled into existence. In this there were but one or two possessed of any capital or influence; the major- ity had little but their labor, and they had to submit to the hardest condi- tions to obtain the means of proceeding to America. A single ship had carried oyer the pilgrims and their fortunes: a fleet now departed with the emigrants that followed in their wake.”20 HISTORY OE BARNSTABLE COUNTY. would not be exercised against all who should dare to propagate or express opinions at variance with the views of the self-constituted rulers of church and state, for in either colony due diligence was manifested to weed-out obnoxious opinions and practices: hut still, the one was, in their estimation, for some reason, to be preferred to the other. We may safely challenge for the first settlers of Sandwich that whilst they were generally friends of good order, good government, and wholesome laws, and were a religious people, they were also in a remarkable degree free from the acerbities of polemic strife. In the state of things that they found existing and to which as good citizens they submitted in all things proper, there seems to us a good Providence. The very faults from which their sympathies were withheld, became instrumental at last in bringing about the greatest good. The Episcopalians, the Baptists, the Antinomians, and the Quakers, each in their turn, felt the rigors of the refusal of the right of religious liberty; and remonstrances were not to be treated forever with derision nor the apathy of the Home Government to be unaroused. Advice long disregarded, at last became peremptory demand: the right of franchise must be enlarged; religious preferences must be respected. Strange to us at the present day it appears, the fathers of the theocracy regarded the question one of “ death or submission;” and, conceiving these to be the alter- natives, delibera^ly resolved to brave the worst: the result was — the Charter forfeited, religious liberty proclaimed, the two colonies united in one, and a death- blow given to that intolerance that had exhibited itself lamentably hitherto.1 1 Strange too, “ that whilst the English church and government at home were charged with intolerance, they should have been engaged in overturning» ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 21 It has been well remarked by an American writer, “ It is deep cause for congratulation, thanksgiving, and praise to the Supreme Ruler of nations, that England possessed a supe- rior power by Charter over the politic course of the first emigrants to this part of the land, causing them to respect the lives and liber- ties of those who could not agree with them in religious matters; for if we look at the severity of treatment exercised towards their own kindred of pure and pious brethren who differed from them on trifling points, and take that as a criterion and a sample of a government it would have been their pleasure to establish here, we cannot be too grateful for the check that was given them; and if the c quo warranto’ was termed by them c an instrument of death,’ the result has worked gloriously for all future generations by giving them a full freedom to worship the God of heaven and earth according to the dictates of their own conscience, and allow- ing every man to be answerable to his Makes, and to his Maker only, for his thoughts in religious matters.” Sandwich being incorporated as a town in 1639, availed dtself the same year of the right now first granted to towns, of choosing Deputies to meet in legis- lative assembly. The Indian name of the principal and central village, was Shawme ; other parts of the town- ship, important as Indian settlements, were Manomet, Pokesit, Scussety Kitteaumuty Scorion, and ComassekumJcanet} Situation and Boundaries. — Sandwich, the most westerly town in Barnstable County, is situate on the shoulder of Cape Cod; extending across the isthmus from Barnstable Bay to Buz- zard’s Bay. It is bounded on the E. by Barnstable; on the S. E. and S. by Marshpee and Falmouth; on the W. by Buzzard’s Bay, and N. W. by Wareham and Plymouth; and on the N. by Barn- stable Bay. — The Town-Hall is 12 m. N. W. from Barnstable the a system of exclusiveness on the distant shores of America. The tyranny of the hierarchy, it was alleged, drove the puritans to America; the tyranny of the puritans forced malcontents to found fresh colonies, stirred up the spirit of Roger Williams to proclaim the then new doctrine of the non-inter- ference of the civil magistrate in matters of religion, and urged the Episco- palians again to insist upon possessing religious and civil liberty for them- selves in America, and, by so doing, threw open in the land the gates of lib- erty, which can never again be closed.”—Bartlett. 1 Nearly all Indian names have been differently written at different times. The modern orthography, Monument, Pocasset, &c. is a wide departure from Indian orthoepy.22 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. shire-town of the County; and 58 m. S. E. of Boston, the capital of the State. The mean length, as also the breadth of the town- ship, is about 10 miles. Subface, Natubal Divisions, &c.—The almost entire surface of the township, if we except the salt marshes, may be said to consist of a continuity of hills or downs of sandy loam, with valleys and hollows that contain small streams and lakes or pools gen- erally denominated ponds. In passing from Plymouth to the Cape by the old county-road, and, soon after crossing the dividing- line between Plymouth and Barnstable Counties, emerging from a forest nearly 12 miles in extent with only here and there a habi- tation or ismall cluster of houses, the traveller is agreeably struck with a view of West Sandwich — such is the present post-office name, better known by its former Indian appellation, Scusset, the perpetuity of which name in preference to modem distinctions we cannot but think would be in good taste. The brook which in former times ran through the centre of this-village, crossing the county-road, and which indicated the course of the early contem- plated ship-canal across the isthmus,1 has been obstructed by a mole or dam, and raised to be a pond furnishing valuable power for mills and various manufacturing purposes. Here, besides a grist-mill, are machine-shops, including the manufacture of car- riages, cars, &c^ near which is one of the Cape Cod railroad sta- tions. The village is pleasant; the soil generally light, but mod- erately productive. Scusset, in fact, furnishes some good farms; and one or more of the finest orchards on the seaboard portion of the State, may be found in this place.2 In this village also was formerly kept the Inn long known as ‘Swift’s,’ which, with anoth- er in the central village, long time known as ‘Fessenden’s,’ gave 1 The stream, the course of which is now the bed of Scusset mill-pond, has been, with Herring River in North Sandwich and Manomet River, the scene of repeated surveys for a canal; but the construction has been hitherto as often postponed although the reports of commissioners demonstrated its practicability. Whether the apprehension that serious difficulties must be encountered from sand-bars forming at the entrances, and that in the severity of winter when most needed the canal might be obstructed by ice, or whether surrounding local prejudices prevailed, we may not pronounce. In the opin- ion of scientific men, no insuperable obstacle lies in the way, unless it be the lack of a disposition to invest capital in the enterprise, and the indifference of legislators to a measure both eminently humane and of great public advantage. The distance between the navigable waters of the two bays, is only five miles, and the waters of the two streams running in opposite direc- tions have but a short space between them, leaving the peninsula almost an island. * That located on the farm and around the summer residence of Hon. Watson Freeman, is especially worthy of note.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 23 to the town a reputation whilom of having two of the best hotels in the country. These, before the days of Newport and Nahant, were the summer resort of many distinguished persons and fami- lies. Retirement, comfort, recreation, and health, were then the demand — which desiderata were not sacrificed to mere ostenta- tious display and the poor privilege of being jostled by a promis- cuous crowd as at modem watering-places. Scusset contains a meeting-house occupied by Methodists, and is divided into two school-districts with each its convenient school-house.1 The har- bor of Scusset is serviceable, but has of late years, being left unprotected, become much obstructed by the ravages of winds and tides. In the northern part of Scusset is Dean’s Creek, con- necting with the harbor, as does also Scusset Creek, into which empties the brook issuing from the mill-pond. This pond yields its share of fine trout. Sagamore Hill, an ancient sachem’s seat, is N. E. of the village. The earliest prevailing names in this part of the town, were Swift, Burgess, Gibbs, Blackwell, and Ellis, and remain so to a considerable extent to the present time. The principal and central village, Sandwich proper, the Indian Shawme, lies about 2 m. E. of Scusset. In the midst of this vil- lage, formerly noted for its rural charms, is a beautiful sheet of water2 connecting with another about half a mile S. in a deep basin formed by surrounding hills. This latter lake, or pond, is the original fountain — the lower pond being derived from it and having been at the first settlement of the town only a small stream meandering through a long and heavily-wooded swamp, the re- mains of which may yet be discerned in here and there a large stump in the bed of the lake. The dam thrown across this ancient stream, thus raising an agreeable expanse of pure water over the formerly gently-murmuring pathway of the surplus waters of the upper lake, affords ample power for mills, &c., as does also another dam between the upper and lower lakes. The latter power for- merly propelled the machinery of a cotton factory; the building is now employed as a tack and nail factory. At the lower dam is a grist-mill; and marble-works take the place of the ancient card- 1 Scusset, lying N. and N. W. of the Town-Hall and partly between North Sandwich and the central village or Sandwich proper, extends N. to Peaked Cliff and the lands of the plantation of the Herring-Pond Indians. * This, so agreeable to the eye and favorable for sailing recreation, fur- nishes in winter an expanse of ice for the multitude who “ sweep On sounding1 skates a thousand different ways In circling poise swift as the winds,” that, for location and extent, can hardly be excelled.24 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. mg, fulling, and cloth-dressing establishments, whose utility has been superseded by the progress of the age. The Town-Hall is near by.1 The village contains five meeting-houses, viz.: Unita- rian, Trinitarian Congregational, Methodist, Universalist, and Roman Catholic; also an academy, Masonic Hall, hotel, &c. These are all in that part of the village on the E. side of the town-brook. The two school-districts, one on either side of the stream, have each commodious school-houses; as has also a third district con- nected with the central village and S. W. of the Town-Harbor, to which village is sometimes applied the name of JarvesviUe2 — a settlement that has chiefly grown up since the establishment of the extensive glass-works, and has become the most business-like in aspect and the most densely settled of any part of the town- ship. Here is located the Roman Catholic church edifice, and, besides the works of the Boston and Sandwich Glass Co.3 and of the Cape Cod Glass Co., are a planing-mill, door, blind, and sash- factory, numerous stores, shops, artisans’ establishments, &c. A railway connects the first glass-establishment with the harbor, and the depot of the Cape Cod R. R. is in this village. In the eastern part of the central village are other streams, though inconsidera- ble, that pass the county-road into the harbor. — It were imprac- ticable to notice particularly all the lesser natural divisions and various public improvements; but we may briefly mention Shawme Neck, (modernized Town-Neck,) for a long period a part of the town’s commons — becoming finally the property of the represen- tatives of the original freemen, ceasing thenceforward to be in the control of the town as such — but to be occupied only for pastur- age, the public to have the right of way. This neck lies adjoining the beach N. E. of the central village.4 East of this neck, includ- 1 This edifice is sufficiently respectable for the economical views of the inhabitants ; but is shorn of its dignity by being partly leased for mechan- ical purposes, rendering it not only less safe as a depository of records, but giving it the appearance of a work-shop rather than the manor-house of a corporation. 8 So called in compliment to the enterprising conductor of the first glass- works erected in the place. 3 In 1850, a glass-bowl made in this establishment was presented to Hon. Daniel Webster, of which Mr. Deming Jarves, in an accompanying let- ter, says, “ It claims the merit of being much the largest piece of flint-glass made by machinery in any part of the world. Two machinists were em- ployed six months m forming the mould. This bowl is the first made in it, and is called ‘ the Union Bowl/ The name will not render it less valuable.” 4 This neck, the number of the proprietors of which has been much reduced, and which is still held in shares, has always been found a most convenient and valuable tract for the purposes to which it is applied: a never-failing supply of herbage for cattle has ever distinguished it.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 25 ing a part of the beach, is a narrow strip yielding the very best clay for the manufacture of brick, and it has long been the source from whose kilns a plentiful supply has been had of this necessary material for building.1 South-west of this neck and clay-deposit courses the salt-water creek into which issues the stream from the lakes or ponds above, and thence to the harbor. This creek and the ponds afford their quota of fine trout. The town-harbor, although the best on the JST. side of the township, is eligible for vessels of light burden only.2 Proceeding eastward from the central part of the town, and passing the town-farm or poor-house, another village presents itself at a place called Spring Hill, where also is a stream afford- ing mill-privileges; and farther on is situated the meeting-house of that quiet class of our fellow-citizens, the Friends ; beyond which is the railroad station. Spring-Hill Creek makes up from the Town-Harbor, as also Muset Creek. Farther on towards Barnstable is a small stream emptying into Scorton harbor. Still beyond, in that part of Spring Hill now called East Sandwich, is a deep pond having no outlet, generally known as Hoxie’s Pond; and still S. E. of this is another known for more than a half cen- tury as Dea. Nye’s Pond, the stream which issues from it being formerly occupied by a cloth-dressing and carding establishment as well as grist-mill—now only the seat of the latter. This pond 1 We may not resist the inclination to notice one of the scenes of juvenile recreation—ay, a recreation of maturer age also — “ Sports have no date, but age has need.” On the E. of this beach is an extensive ledge of rocks where, at low-water, when the rocks are exposed, lobsters may be taken in abundance from cav- ities beneath. As is well known, this fish is at all times taken by setting traps or pots in deep water far off from the shore; but in this employment there is no pastime. In taking the fish from their dens some distance be- yond low-water mark—wading out into the briny ocean rising to one’s arm- pits, and by practised touch determining their presence and position — the implement of assault upon this squilla-genus in their rocky cavities being a short pole with hook affixed — and drawing them forth without mutilation and bagging them without self-detriment, this is an exercise; and all the more agreeable because a utilitarian mode of bathing and sport combined. And then, their transfer the same hour to the boiling-hot caldron —how different the luxury from that enjoyed by our unfortunate fellow-cits who, remote from this field of action, are content with the fish after its imprison- ment perhaps for weeks in an irritated and feverish state from which it suf- fers constant deterioration! * The old channel of this harbor, which, with the bar at its mouth, was often changing, has within a few years been artificially closed and a new channel cut by which the harbor is thought to be much improved. This im- provement was made at much expense, by consent of the town, chiefly by file efforts of the Boston and Sandwich Glass Co., under the superintend- ence of Deming Jarves Esq. * vol. n. 426 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. and brook, which empty into Scorton Creek and Harbor, have long been a favorite resort of anglers who never fell to find in these wa- ters the finest trout. The school districts in this part of the town are two, with suitable school-houses. Two or more private schools, under the direction of Friends, are also located in this part of the town, and receive a good share of encouragement from abroad. Still eastward, continuing to the Barnstable line, is a scattered and somewhat extended settlement called by its ancient Indian name, Scorton. This is another school district. It contains a pond having no outlet; and also an apology for a harbor. On Scorton Neck, which is bounded W. and S. by Scorton Creek and is nearly surrounded by it, are some valuable estates. There have been through many generations notable instances of thrifty farm- ing in this part of the township. If we return to our starting-point, Scusset, to reconnoitre other parts of the town, we find west of that village, near the route of the once contemplated canal, another flourishing village, with the post-office designation of North Sandwich, long and more famil- iarly known as Herring River} Herring Pond, from which the river takes its name, is a large sheet of water extending far into the township of Plymouth, and invested with somewhat of the romantic both in its location and scenery.1 2 The river which an- nually yields a large supply of herring for the Indians’ and Town’s use, furnishes also a large amount of water-power for mills and various machinery; and, changing its name at tide-water to Man- omet River, flows into Buzzard’s Bay. The waters of this side the isthmus and the Scusset side, we have already said, nearly join. On this river are the Manomet Iron Works, near the rail- road depot, a stave-mill, grist-mill, &c. Farther down the river is a manufactory for edge tools, &c. In the village is a school- house. Herring Pond affords a supply of fine perch, and the river is excellent trouting ground. 1 A high conical elevation at this place, was, since the memory of the writer, marked by numerous Indian graves and still a place of sepulture; but has now been discontinued as a burying-place, although a remnant of the tribe yet remain in occupancy of the Indian plantation lying on the borders of the village, but chiefly within the bounds of Plymouth. The In- dian meeting-house is near by. It has been said that the name of this ori- ginal plantation is lost; but there is, we think, scarcely room to doubt that the plantation of the Herring-Pond tribe was the ancient Comassakumkanet. * This pond is divided distinctively into Little Herring Pond and Great Herring Pond. The latter lies chiefly in Plymouth. The river which issues from these, is in North Sandwich.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 27 Monument, the Indian Manomet, is another considerable village lying W. and S. W. of North Sandwich. Here was the ancient trading-house of the Plymouth adventurers.1 In Monument are Congregational andMethodist meeting-houses, an academy, and two school-houses. Here also is a stream2 used for milling and manufac- turing,3 having its outlet in the hay and situate in that part of Monument reaching from Manomet River to Pocasset. This latter river, it need hardly be said, is navigable. A good supply of oysters and other shell-fish are yet found in this river and parts adjacent; and here also is fine sport for those fond of fishing for tautog, scup- paug, and blue fish. Between the mouth of Manomet River and Cohasset Narrows, is Bourne’s Neck; and near the railroad depot in Monument is Bourne’s Pond. Back River harbor, whose N. W. bound is Rocky Point, has Hog Island west of its entrance. Mash- nee Island is S. of Hog Island, and E. S. E. of this is Burgess’ Island, being W. of the S. corner of Monument. At Back River are salt- works—the last remaining of formerly extensive manufactures of the kind in Sandwich.4 At Monument is a railroad depot, with which the Falmouth stages regularly connect. Cohasset, the point at which the waters divide Monument and Cowesit — a neck of land in Wareham, has a few inhabitants, and has become somewhat important by reason of its coasting facili- ties. A whar£ at the Narrows, in immediate contiguity with the railroad, becomes annually the deposit of a large amount of coal for manufacturing and other purposes. Here also is fine fishing ground. Another village, on Buttermilk Bay, known as the Head op the Bay, has long afforded very considerable advantages for nav- igation. Here, not far from the Plymouth line is a pond connect- ing with another smaller .pond in Plymouth, both emptying into Little Buttermilk Bay. Here also is Sewall’s Pond, no outlet. Cedar Pond empties into the bay. Agawam Point is S. of the mouth of Cedar Pond outlet. Here again, the supply of fish, es- pecially shell-fish, is abundant. 1 Situate on Manomet River—a continuation of Herring River and con- necting with Buzzard’s Bay. 2 Called Perry’s Mill-pond, whose outlet is Back River. 3 Here at present is a grist-mill and a nail factory. East of Perry’s Mill- pond, is Deep-Bottom Pond, in the woods. 4 For a time, the net profits upon the capital invested in this town in the salt-manufacture, averaged 25 per cent.; but the business here, as elsewhere on the Cape, succumbed finally to a different state of things; and the invest- ment, from being extensive, became from year to year less and less, until, at last, the works were used only so long as they remained undecayed and fit for use without expensive repairs.28 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Returning from this excursion in the direction of Wareham, and retracing our steps through the entire length of Monument westward and southward, we come to the ancient 2d Precinct of Sandwich, called by the early Indians Poughkeeste—at a later period Pokesit, and now called Pocasset. It is situated on Buz- zard’s Bay. Barlow’s River, its nearly NT. W. bound, is the site of extensive iron-works for hollow-ware and castings, as also a manufacture of edge tools. Here is a Baptist meeting-house. S. W. of the river’s mouth, is Wenaumet Neck,1 the extreme point of which is called Wing’s Neck—where is a light-house. Between this neck and Scraggy Neck, and W. of Red Brook harbor, is Bassett’s Island. Red Brook connects Handy’s Pond with the harbor. On this stream, are mills which turn out large quantities of flour and meal. The flour is celebrated, and com- mands an extra price. This part of Pocasset is called South Pocasset. East of Handy’s Pond is Swift’s Pond, and still E. is Flax Pond. Scraggy Neck, formerly parsonage property of the 1st Parish and situated S. W. of Red Brook harbor, is now at high water an island. In South Pocasset is a Methodist meeting- house occupying the place of the old 2d Precinct Cong, meeting- house, and around it is an ancient burial-place. The school dis- tricts in Pocasset are three, with convenient school-houses. As we pass on by the road to N. Falmouth, is a small pond, and S. E. of this is Long Pond, about E. of which is Bear-Hollow Pond not far from the Marshpee line — all in the forest. In Pocasset waters, are found an ample supply of fish, including the trout. We have thus, in our wanderings, since our notice of Scorton, described a nearly semi-circuitous route, leaving a large tract of woodland on the left, in the centre of the entire circuit. A road cutting through this central forest, from Pocasset to Sandwich — central village, brings us, nearly equi-distant from the two places, to the Soconessit Ponds, in Soconessit Hollow, near by which is Opening Pond — all in deep recesses surrounded by densely- wooded, rocky, precipitous hills. If we pass through these woods from Pocasset to South Sand- wich, we find N. of Bear-Hollow and N. W. of Marshpee, Weeks’ Pond, and E. of this Snake Pond—the two united by a narrow passage. The latter pond is large. Near it is the village now called Greenville, where is a Methodist meeting-house and school- house. This and other portions of the S. W. part of the town- 1 Doubtless the “ Katamet,” or “ Kitteaumut, on Buzzard’s Bay,” often referred to by early writers.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 29 ship, formerly known under the general designation of ‘The Woods,’ and the particular designations Snake Pond, Wakeby, Hog Pond, &c., have become settlements of increased importance known by distinctive post-office appellations. Peter’s Pond, on the E. side of the village of Greenville, is a large and beautiful lake; and S. of this is the Indian Wakepee. Between the two, S. W. of the one, and N. W. of the other — bordering on the land purchased of the Mashpees and the present Marshpee plantation, is Pimlico Pond. Wakepee, or as it is now called, Wakeby Pond, is N. of Marshpee Pond and united to it, the latter being also bounded on the E. by purchased Marshpee lands.1 Wakeby is a 1 We are strongly tempted, and we have no doubt will be pardoned for yielding to the impulse, to quote in this place the opening paragraph of a letter (priv. cor. Vol. H. p. 257) of Hon. Daniel Webster to his son, and the editorial note of that son. Our admiration of Wakeby and Marshpee Ponds would help us easily to conceive how either might lend inspiration; but, whilst we confess “ The power, the beauty, and the majesty That have their haunt in dale or piny mountains, Or forest by slow stream, or pebbly spring,” we hardly supposed a wade through the depth and length of Marshpee River would be most favorable to the infusion of lofty thought. The line or two of the letter, which we give with its facetious quotation, will, with the edito- rial explanation, need no comment of ours: “ Marshfield, June 12, 1847. “ My dear Son: I received yours last night with the gear.......... I have fixed my old John Trout rod, and it does very well:—‘Venerable man, you have come down to us from a former generation,’ &c. &c. &c.” .... The editorial note explanatory, is this: — “ The Marshpee River flows from a very large lake called Wakeby Pond, in Barnstable County, into the ocean, on the S. E. coast of Mass. It is a short and rapid stream running into a deep valley, or, rather, ravine, with high precipitous sides covered with a thick‘growth of small pines and various kinds of brush-wood and shrubs. The only method of fishing it, is by wading along the middle and throwing under the banks on either side, it being unapproachable other- wise owing to the trees and underbrush. It was, as he states in his auto- biography, whilst middle-deep in this stream, that Mr. Webster composed a great portion of his first Bunker Hill address. He had taken along with him that well-known angler, John Denson, usually called ‘ John Trout/ and myself. I followed him along the stream, fishing the holes and bends which he left for me ; but, after a while, began to notice that he was not so atten- tive to his sport, or so earnest as usual. He would let his line run care- lessly down the stream, or hold his rod still while his hook was not even touching the water; omitted trying the best places under the projecting roots of the pines, and seemed indeed quite abstracted and uninterested in his amusement. This, of course, caused me a good deal of wonder, and, after calling his attention once or twice to his hook hanging on a twig, or caught in the long grass of the river, and finding that after a moment he relapsed again into the same indifference, I quietly walked up near him and watched. He seemed to be gazing at the overhanging trees, and presently advancing one foot and extending his right hand, he commenced to speak, ‘ Venerable men/ &c. &c. We afterwards frequently referred to the cir- cumstance, as he does in the above letter.”30 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. romantic sheet of water, variegated by islands, and is much fre- quented for sailing excursions. Pickerel are found here, as in numbers of the other ponds. Lily Pond is S. E. of Wakeby, and E. of Wakeby is the village of South Sandwich. N. E. of the latter village, and S. of Spring Hill, is a large pond called from its peculiar shape Spectacle Pond; S. of this is Triangle Pond; E. of this is Lawrence Pond; S. E. is Lower Hog Pond, and still E. is Upper Hog Pond — both clear pleasant waters, and lying towards the Barnstable line. These all are embraced within what is now called Fabmebsville. There are numerous other smaller ponds scattered over the township: those already mentioned are the most prominent, though some of them are of little importance. In short, the town- ship in every part abounds with ponds and brooks, and numbers of these are stored with fish—perch, trout, or pickerel. The trout, which, of course, occupy, for the most part, waters from which their relentless enemy the pickerel are excluded, are abun- dant and very fine, having access to both fresh and salt water. Those taken in the salt-water creeks at certain seasons, are found to be much improved by their alternating propensities. This beautiful and delicious fish has through a long course of years invited to these waters numerous disciples of Izaak Walton. The herring, largely supplied in their season, by Herring River through which this fish ascends in the Spring-months to Herring Pond, for spawning, are much valued.1 It was, from the very first settlement of the town, an object to encourage the access of this fish to the ponds they had been accustomed to frequent; but the only stream of which they have held possession in any considera- ble numbers to the present time, is indicated above. An opening, as will be seen, was early provided for their passage to the ponds in the central village—their natural course having incautiously been obstructed by the dams and mills first erected: but though 1 The reader will, of course, understand that alewives are meant. Wood, in his “ New Eng. Prospect, being a true, lively, and experimental descrip- tion of that part of America, commonly called New England, 1634,” very properly distinguishes between herring and alewives: “ The herring,” he says, “ be much like them on the English coasts: alewives be a kind of fish much like a herring, which in the latter end of April come up to the fresh rivers to spawn, in such multitudes as is almost incredible, pressing up such shallow waters as will scarce permit them to swim.” The English Tierring, formerly taken in immense quantities on the coasts of the Cape, but especially in Cape Cod harbor, seem of late years to have made the waters of Lubec in Maine and other eastern locations their favorite resort: the alewives are ever as sure to revisit their ancient rivers as the Spring is to return.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 31 these fish have continued to present themselves annually in suffi- cient force persistently to assert and hold valid their original title to the waters above, they have ever evinced an aversion to scaling the sluice-way proposed for their accommodation; and, finding the mills as persistently occupying the legitimate path-way, have, as often, appeared to content themselves to avow their disposition to occupy their rightful domain on ancient and honorable terms. The long-continued abundant supply from the other source indi- cated, has thus far prevented further parley with them or the yielding of the accommodations demanded. The bays and their inlets still, as formerly, yield their supply of cod,1 haddock, bass,2 halibut,8 sheepshead, mackerel,4 tautog, scup, bluefish, flounders, smelts, eels,6 and other fish, whenever a challenge is fairly offered: but piscation was at no period of the history of Sandwich a prominent employment of its inhabitants ; 1 This fish has certainly made no progress in these waters since the days of Wood: he says, “ Cod-fish in these seas are larger than in New-found land, 6 or 7 of them making a quintal.” 2 Wood is quite enthusiastic in his description of the treasures of the deep, and even indulges in elaborate rhyme. He says, 44 There be all man- ner of fish: — “ The stately basse old Neptune’s fleeting post That tides it out and in from coast to coast, ” which he pronounces 44 one of the best fishes in the country, for tho’ men are soon wearied with other fish, yet they are never with basse; it is a deli- cate, fine, fat, fast fish having a bone in his head, which contains a saucerful of marrow sweet and good, pleasant to the palate and wholesome to the stomach. When there is great store of them we only eat the heads, and salt up the bodies for winter, which exceed ling or heberdine. Of these fishes, some be 3 & 4 ft. long. The fisherman taking a great cod-line to which he fastens a piece of lobster, throws it into the sea—the fish biting at it he pulls her towards him and knocks her on the head with a stick. These are, at one time, when alewives pass up, to be caught in rivers; in lobster times, at the rocks; in mackerel times, in the bays; at Michaelmas, in the seas. When they use to tide it in and out to the rivers and creeks, the English at the top of high water do cross the creeks with long seines or bass-nets which stop the fish, and the water ebbing from them, they are left on the ground sometimes 2 or 300 at a set.” 3 44 The wry-mouthed halibut,” says Wood, “ is not much unlike a place or turbot; some be 2 yds. long, 1 wide, and 1 ft. thicke ; the plenty of bet- ter fish makes them of little esteeme, except the head ana finnes which stewed or baked is very good. These be little set by while basse is in season.” 4 These, “ The macrells, richly clad With rainebow colours,” says our accurate observer, 4‘ be of two sorts: in the beginning of the year are great ones which be on the coast, some 18 in. long. In summer, come in a smaller kind — taken with drailes, a long small line with lead and hooks being baited with red cloth. Here they are so fat as scarcely can be saved.” 6 44 Salt water eeles taken in pots made of osyers, baited with lobster. Some take a bushel in a night.”32 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. and of late years its dependence for supplies of this sort has been chiefly on the toils of the inhabitants of other places; labors of more utility taking the precedence here. Oysters which were once very abundant and of superior quali- ty, have not entirely vacated their beds; but, in some of the best locations, have become nearly exterminated. They are yet sup- plied in diminished quantities from Manomet River; but, from the constant exactions upon them, are of small size. Those in the bays on the south side, formerly abundant and very large and finely flavored, have ceased, except as occasionally the once noted ‘ bay- oyster ’1 is discovered by some lucky wight, in deep water whither they have withdrawn. Clams2 3 and quohogs are yet at hand; the latter especially on the south side. Some of the large sea-clam8 yet remain on the north side, and lobsters in great profusion. Large tracts of woodland are yet covered with oak and pine. These are valuable; and lie south and west of the villages that are stretched along on the old county-road, separating them from the villages S. and W. of these tracts. In these forests are deer and other game. It is a singular fact that the oldest, should be the only district where are found the original tenants of the soil, biped and quadruped—Indians and the fallow deer.4 * * * Partridges 1 These, in their primitive condition, were very aptly described by Wood: “ The oisters be great ones in form of a shoe-home, some a foot long. The fish without the shell so big it must admit of a division to be got in your mouth.” 2 Wood says, “ Clams, or Clamps, lye under the sand, every six or seven of them having a round hole to take air and receive water at. When the tide ebbs and flows, a man running over these clam banks, will presently be made all wet by their spouting of water out of these small holes.” 3 These are doubtless the same of which Wood says, “ In some places there be clams as big as a penny white loaf.”—But we can indulge no fur- ther in quotations from Mr. Wood’s account of the fishes — except to add a few lines from his notice of “ shel-fish,” which we give rather as a specimen: “ The luscious lobster, with the crabfish raw, The brinish oister, muscle, periwigge, And tortoise sought for by the Indian squaw Which to the flats dance many a winter’s jigge To dive for cockles, and to digge for clams, Whereby her lazie husbands guts shee cramms.” 4 The range for this animal extends from Plymouth and Wareham to Falmouth and Barnstable, the Elizabeth Islands included. Under the pro- tection of laws limiting to appropriate seasons the time of taking them, and defining the manner of hunting, deer have continued to increase. — We are here reminded of a queer statement of Wood in his New England Prospect, whose credulity we have had occasion to notice m our former volume, and whose narrative quoted in the preceding pp. of this, although partaking sometimes of the marvellous, proves him to have been, as he is represented, one of the most intelligent observers of his time: he says,ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 33 and quails are common.— The forests and plains were once the common resort of large flocks of sheep. Raised here in great numbers, the forage being well adapted to their development, Sandwich-mutton was once proverbially of excellent quality.1 The average price in the month of October, when sold to drovers, was only about one dollar per head, and the meat was greatly preferred by connoisseurs. Goats were also in the early days con- sidered a species of stock worthy of attention!2 Extensive salt marshes and fresh meadows, yield large crops of provender for stock; but by reason of the great increase of the English grasses, they have ceased to be valued as formerly. These marshes afford much game; but, notwithstanding the aversion of the owners of these grounds to the foot of sportsmen treading down their meadows, the plover, curlew, and a numerous cata- logue of smaller and delicious shore-birds, have, from incessant persecution, become less numerous than in former days. The wild-goose, duck, teal, &c. with their great varieties, have also be- come scarce; the natural result of the increase of population. The whip-poor-will, the boblincoln, and the robin, continue to en- liven the air with their notes; but in greatly diminished numbers. Although these last belong to a class of birds that shrink from the gloomy and uncultivated parts of any country, not deigning to dwell in solitudes, or to put forth their melody to rocks and trees alone, they seem too generally to have resented the frequent an- noyances which in latter days they have met, and seek for resting- places of greater security. In a word, the town, once proverbial for its rural pleasantness, has been measurably shorn of many of its earlier charms. Still, it is a delightsome location, in the view of those who have been nurtured here; and no town in our ex- tended country can boast of a more salubrious atmosphere, purer water, greater healthfulness, or more of the general comforts and conveniences of life.3 “ It is not to be thought into what great multitudes they would increase, were it not for the common devouring wolf. They have -generally three at a time, which they hide a mile one from the other, giving them suck by turns. Thus they do, that if the wolf should find one, he might miss of the other. Of these deer, there be a great many, and more in Massachusetts Bay than in any other place, which is a great refreshment to those planters.” 1 In the early days, shepherds were employed for these flocks. Of late years, being excluded from the woods and waste places, sheep have nearly dis- appeared from the town and are an article of import for the necessary supply. 5 The “ Goat-pasture lots ” indicate this. 3 In the Monthly Anthology for 1821, we find some notes by Tudor, describ- ing an excursion made by mmself and kindred associates, to Sandwich and VOL. H. 534 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY The employment of the people of this town, is maritime, maun* factural, and agricultural; but the town in its general character, is more agricultural than otherwise—largely manufactural, but less maritime probably than any other town on the Cape. The quality of the soil, especially on or near the E. side of the road extending from Scusset to Barnstable, is generally good, well- cultivated, and productive. In other parts of the township, there is some good soil; but for the most part it is light and not so favorable for grain or grasses. Orchards succeed well, and by proper attention may be made a source of much profit. The town being chiefly agricultural, and next to that manufac- turing, the number of vessels owned here is small, and occupied generally in home-pursuits. Still, besides the coasters and pack- other places on the Cape. As these notes relate to former times and graphically detail some matters of interest, we quote, in condensed form: “ After leaving Plymouth, on our way to Sandwich, we passed the Sacrifice Bocks, covered with dry sticks by Indians — who never allowed themselves to pass these rocks without an offering of this kind; the rem- nant of some unknown superstition. On reaching S. we gave a brief order for dinner. * Every thing there was in the house.’ We had a most esurient longing worthy of a municipality, for the good things of this region of game. The next order was to send for John Trout, to engage him during our stay This second name, like that of Scipio Africanus, was the reward for the most distinguished services. His piscatory exploits and minute knowl- edge of all the haunts, habits, and connections of some of our most valuable fishes, entitle him to the honor of a distinguished place among the Ichthy- ologists in the New York Academy, and we hope this hint will fall under their notice. John is in fact a man of so much renown that those who have never heard of him would do well to conceal their misfortune; for he might well say, * Not to know me, argues yourself unknown,— The meanest of your tribe.’ ” (His portrait is preserved with care among the embellishments of the Athe- naeum.) “His skill and alacrity were shown in some very fine trout that graced our breakfast-table the next morning.—The next day was one of those exquisite days of vernal softness and autumnal ripeness harmonious- ly blended, when the scattered clouds which were floating under the mildest cerulean sky, we might almost fancy to be the vehicles that were bearing about the spirits of the blest, high above this nether world of strife, conventions, and cattle-shows ; — one of those days, in short, in which every feeling mind would bless the memory of our forefathers for having landed here. We proceeded together, John as an outrider, to Deacon Nye’s Brook, about five miles on the road to Barnstable. Here, under the auspices of John,— ‘ auspice Teucrof — one of the party commenced snipe-shooting, and an- other trout-catching. Another two continued on to Great Marshes, and yet another to visit Barnstable town, where he had never been before, and which (having caught the inspiration of John) he reported on his return, as very little changed. Great Marshes is a fertile spot where the Otis family have continued for five or six generations, and where the celebrated patriot, James Otis Jr., was born. By one of the family we were obligingly fur- nished with a few documents for the Historical Society. “We dined at four on the proceeds of the day’s sport, aided, it is true, byANNALS OP SANDWICH. 35 ets, some interest is taken in this village in other navigation, and whalers sailing from other ports find owners in part here. Ship- building which was once carried on in different parts of the town, the timber being furnished by the forests at hand, has now ceased entirely. The several inlets in and about Buzzard’s and Buttermilk Bays, as also Manomet River, afford safe harbors and sufficiently com- modious for the navigation proposes of limited extent in the use of craft of small burden, of the inhabitants in the S. side of the township; whilst, on the opposite side, Scusset, Spring Hill or Scorton harbors* with Town Harbor, are found in the same degree convenient. The harbors, though adequate to the vocation gen- erally of the inhabitants, are none of large capacity; and hence, a few supplementary dishes, of which it is only necessary to particularize Tautog and Sandwich Mutton. This latter is worthy of all praise. It resembles exactly the mutton of ‘ the Downs of Britain/ considered as the first on the island ‘ of that ilk.’ Suffice it to say, that a gastrologer would devour it, a gastronomer enjoy it, and a gastrophilist appreciate it. John very candidly said that trout were now out of season. The best months for them are May and June. He agreed that the trout of Coaiuit were among the very best; but, he said, * the natives ’ (he rhymed them with knives,) ‘ were great poachers in that stream * — (their own domain!) “ Before we dismiss the meritorious John, a piece of his reasoning may be recorded, that partakes a little of the raciness of his Hibernian origin. When asked what was due for his services, (merely to ascertain the fact, with no paltry trading notions of cavilling about the price, — this would not have done with one of his lofty pursuits, the occupation of the privi- leged ones of earth,) — he told us that ‘ his wages were $1.25 a day; this/ he added, ‘was the price when grain (corn, Indian com) was $2 a bushel, and he should not increase the price, although com was now selling at 50 c. per bushel: he would not charge more.’ “The next day, we went to Marshpee Indian Meeting-House. . . . It was Sunday. The men sit on one side of the meeting-house; the women on the other. . . . “ Sandwich is one of the most pleasant villages in Massachusetts. To persons fond of fishing, sporting, or riding, it offers greater resources than any other spot in this country. Snipes, plovers, quails, partridges, are abundant; and also deer. Coatuit, Waquoit, Manomet, and fifty other brooks are full of the finest trout, &c. Both bays are full of fish. And in Buzzard’s Bay, oysters and other kinds of shell-fish are plenty. The roads are excellent towards the Vineyard Sound. Some parts of Sandwich re- semble districts in Surrey and Sussex in England. “ The population is stationary. But then they send off numerous recruits. The State of Massachusetts owes most of its inhabitants originally to ‘ the Cape.’ You may see a good deal of poor land; but you see very few poor men. The whole appearance of the population is solid, substantial, com- fortable. “ The territorial extent is to be estimated by adding triple to the amount of land, from the surrounding sea. These acres of the sea produce five times as much as the richest fields of the South and West. Fisher Ames once said that ‘ every cod-fish drawn up had a pistareen in its mouth.’ — We would not like to live in a locality not ventilated by a sea-breeze.”HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. 36 probably, decide measurably the business of the towii in a mari» time aspect. The population of the town was in 1800, as per census, 2024, occupying 296 houses. In 1850, it was 4181. In 1860, it was 4489, and the number of tenements 903, occupied by 960 families. The Cape Cod Railroad, passing through the town, having depots or stations at Cohasset, Monument, North Sandwich, West Sandwich, Sandwich, and Spring Hill, has, of course, changed very much the mode of travel, and may, possibly, have quickened the enterprise of the place. Sandwich has, in times past, been distinguished for the educa- tional facilities it has afforded. The multiplication of schools of high order in every part of the State, has left it nothing entitling it now in this respect to preeminence. Many persons of high dis- tinction have received their academic education here ; and from among its own native-born, have arisen those who, from the ear- liest history of the town, have been talented, and whose patriot- ism and integrity have been approved by their public career.1 Progress of the Town, from its settlement.—We have already noted the first settlement of the town. The first circumstantial account of the Churcb in Sandwich, shows 11 male members, viz.: Edmund Freeman,2 Richard 1 In an early No. of the publications of the Mass. Hist. Soc., are statistics of the mortality in the 1st Cong. Soc* in Sandwich, from Jan. 1,1790, to Jan. 1, 1800 $ and as this parish at that time embraced at least three-fourths of the population of the whole town — say about 1500 out of 2000, those statis- tics may be regarded as a very fair exhibit of the health of the town from its first settlement to the present time. The deaths were. in lfiOO pop. Of 184 deaths, The population living 24 in year 1790. 31 d. under 1 year. 90 yrs. or more, as 1 to 30. 19 “ 1791. 18 d. bet. 1 and 5. 80 “ “ i«ii. 12 « 1792. 9 « 5 « 10. 70 “ « 1 “ 6. 22 « 1793. 15 u 10 “ 20. 60 “ “ 1 « 4. 20 “ 1794. 24 M 20 “ 30. 50 “ “ 1 “ 3. 19 “ 1795. 13 30 “ 40. 40 “ k j (( 21. 89 “ 1796. 16 << 40 “ 50. 30 “ “ 1 “ 244. 13 “ 1797. 12 ft 50 “ 60. 20 “ “ 1 “ 2f 6 “ 1798. 16 M 60 “ 70. 10 “ 1799. 14 ti 70 “ 80. ^ The average number of —— 10 M 80 “ 90. deaths per annum, 18| ; i.e., as 184 in 10 years. 6 M 90 “ 100. 1 to 81J. Note — that the population of the entire town was in 1790 precisely 1991, and it had increased in 1800 to 2024. * Mr. Edmund Freeman, the leading proprietor of the town, was bom in England abt. 1590. He brought with him from Eng., two sons, Edmund Jr. ana John, one 15, and the latter 8 yrs, of age at the time of their embarka-ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 37 Bourne, Thomas Tupper, Thomas Burge,- James Skeffe, William Newland, Peter Gaunt, Richard Kerby, John Newland, Ralph Allen, and George Allen. And here we may as well remark that, although it is not our purpose to givq any thing more than the general eccle- siastical history of the towns, yet, for reasons that must be obvious, we may mention with some particularity the history of the churches at the beginning, the Colony generally being settled by churches as such, and the pastor and leading church-members in each community being the prominent personages. There can be no doubt that public worship was maintained in the settle- ment from the very commencement; and there can, perhaps, be as little room to doubt that there was from the first an organized church. When the first meeting- house was erected does not appear; but as early as 1644 it was found necessary to repair the meeting-house, and, singularly enough, it was then called “ the old meeting-house.” This last circumstance is suggestive of the impression that it had been a question whether to repair or build. If some matters quite minute and of themselves of little general interest shall appear in the annals of the tion in 1635, both of whom married drs. of Gov. Prince. He also brought with him daughters: Alice, the eldest, who was 17 when the family left Eng., and who m. Dea. William Paddy of Plym., the first treas. of the Colony; and Elizabeth, the third child in order, aged 12, who m. Mr. John Ellis of Sandwich. It is said of Mr. Freeman that “ he was a man of consideration in England, and brought with him much valuable plate; ” which last remark we suppose was intended to be indicative of his position in society. Such, perhaps, it might have been at that day; but it would be a poor criterion now. It is said, moreover, that he acted as the “ confidential agent ” of certain of the “merchant adventurers.” This would seem to be corrobo- rated by his correspondence with Mr. Beauchampe, “ a London merchant and valuable friend to the colony,” who was also brother-in-law to Mr. Free* man. Mr. Freeman was not only conspicuous in town affairs, but was from 1640 to 1646 inclusive, Assistant in the government of the Colony. He lived to be 92 yrs. old, dying in Sandwich m 1682. His sons Edmund and John, were also prominent, both being Deputies to the Gen. Ct., and the latter, who removed to Eastham, also Assistant The descendants of these have been numerous in the County of Barnstable, and axe widely scattered over the U. States and elsewhere.38 mSTOET OF BARNSTABLE county. towns, still, we trust, it will be considered that, given as they are found on the records, although in fragments, they help the inquirer to apprehend the condition and character of the people. President Dwight has well remarked that “ a country changing rapidly as New England” did, especially in its incipiency, “must, if truly exhibited, be described in a manner like that in which a painter would depict a cloud: the form and colors of the moment must be seized.” We have already mentioned Eev. William Leverich as the first minister, and in a note, first vol., have inti- mated the chief that we know of his early history. The precise , time of his coming to Sandwich is not asserted. In 1687 a lot was assigned to him in Dux- bury where he was associated with Kev. Mr. Partridge in the ministry ; but he was certainly in Sandwich before 1640, and probably immediately after the com- mencement of the settlement, for we find in the colo- nial records of that period, the reply to sundry ques- tions submitted to‘the grantors “by Mr. Leverich and others of Sandwich,” — showing pretty conclusively that he was among the very first on the ground; or that if he was not here in 1637 he was in intimate union with those who were here, and was seeking for light that would determine his deliberations in regard to a settle- ment here. We are unavoidably constrained to a con- viction of the correctness of the former position; be- lieving that he was not merely performing a kindly office for- the actual settlers in Sandwich by his influence at Plymouth whilst he yet continued at Duxbury contem- plating a removal, but had already become a bom fide settler, and that the expression “of Sandwich” em- braced him as well as others.1 1 The data to which we refer, is. a document, of 1637, entitled "An Answer to the propositions made by Mr. Leveridge and others of Sandwich concerning the land there.” We copy:ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 39 The reason why the settlement, begun with vigor, embracing a competent number of respectable and well-ordered families, with at least the ordinary propor- tion of wealth, generally united in religious views — views which, so far as now appears, were in consonance with those professed by the colonial government, and disposed as they were to maintain the institutions of religion, were not at once allowed the rights of a town, does not to us clearly appear. One thing is very evi- dent,—that during its pupilage or probation of two or three years, it received its due share of the attentions of that august tribunal, the Colonial Court. We have “ Prop. 1: Whether the undertakers have a full gift of the lands at Sand* wich, or whether a conditional grant only for the settling of a convenient number there that may be useful for the commonwealth and chiefly fit for church fellowship ? — Ans: To the 1st We answer; for your term of under- take^ we rather put instead thereof Committies as suiting more properly with the relation betwixt them and us, their grant being conditional ana not absolute, and the trust committed to them being for the care of the gov- ernment and more convenient accommodation of such people ^s shall be qualified according to the condition and intent of the grant and their joint premises. “ Prop. 2: Whether such of them as are still at Saugus shall have any power at all there, either to dispose of things or to possess any lands at all in case they come not to inhabit?—Ans: To this 2d we answer negatively; for when they made suit to us, it was as a people straitened and pretending removal really with all possible conveniency. “ Prop. 3: Whether it may not be thought convenient to add some oth- ers in their stead to the rest, in case they come not—such as are of the church there, or neighbors of good report?—Ans: To the 3d we answer affirmatively, if need require: provided you make choice of such as the Govt, shall approve of, for they are but committies. “ Prop, 4. Whether they may not substitute any in their rooms, in case they be necessarily called to be absent ?^Ans: To the 4th we answer as to the 3d. “ Prop. 5: Whether if this power be abused, how it may be reformed ?— Ans: To the 5th, as abuses snail arise, upon due complaint the magistrates must do justice as in other cases. “ Prop. 6: Whether in particular it be not an abuse of the power in case they should monopolize the chief places of conveniency for lands, woods, meadows, &c., to the prejudice of the town in general ? — Ans: To the 6th we answer; such the case may be, and the damage to the whole so great as not to he suffered: but if the committies be faithiul and able of estate their pains will not be small, now their estates must be provided for, and their pains will require more than ordinary accommodation. “ To the Query in the letter, Whether two townships, &c., we answer, we made the grant of the lands to one; neither can there be any other without the allowance of the Govt.; but if the lands far off be disposed of for farms to men of estate, we see no cause of dislike.”40 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. no evidence of any dissatisfaction being expressed at this; and, therefore, may presume that however vigilant were the authorities, and however strictly municipal regulations were enforced, or summarily delinquencies were visited, the inhabitants were, as a community of sober, intelligent, law-abiding citizens, not disposed to utter a murmuring word. We have no intent to recapitulate all that is found on the records of the court from time to time; but, as in our first volume, we adverted to some instances to convey an idea of the watchfulness observed, so here we may do the same to show at least the frequent in- conveniences to which the people were subjected in attending courts at Plymouth. The legislative acts of 1637, in regard to the qualifications of freemen and the conditions on which any may become housekeepers, and of 1638 in regard to the ringing of swine’s snouts and divers other regulations, were early felt to be no dead-letter, statutes even as affecting the newest, re- motest, or sparsest settlements. The record of 1638 tells us, “ These men of Sandwich were fined for not having their swine ringed: viz. Richard Bourne, 3 pigs; John Carman, 1 sow and 11 pigs; Thos. Tupper, 5 swine; Thos. Armitage, 2 swine.” Again, at another court, the same year, for the same neglect, “Edward Freeman,1 Richard Kerby, Robert Bodfish, John Ding- ley, Peter Gaunt, Richard Chadwell, and John Burge,” were fined. There is no evidence that complaint was made of any injury being done by the swine; or that the informer was a resident of the town. In fact, the list of the delinquents embraced a large proportion of 1 Edward: so say the records. But, although the name is repeated,and Mr. Somerby says he found it on the Admiralty record in London, we are inclined still to regard it as a chirographical error. We suppose that Ed- mund Freeman was intended. Even Dr. Palfrey, in his recent History, makes Edward Freeman the Assistant elected in 1640!ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 41 the most influential of the new-comers; and, situated as they were at the time, just commencing their re- spective operations in farming, it is altogether improb- able that any inconvenience could be experienced by any neighbor on account of another’s swine not being ringed. The ringing would give no additional security to gardens or grain-fields, if that were the object; and there were no grasses under cultivation the sward of which might be disturbed. These neighbors were gen- erally widely scattered, from Scusset to Scorton. In a word, it seems quite incredible that any one of the actual settlers here was disposed to make trouble: but yet there existed a law requiring the ringing of swine, even young pigs; and somehow the authorities at the seat of justice were informed in regard to all delinquencies, and the delinquents were summoned to Plymouth and the fines were assessed! The case of “ Henry Ewer and wife,” before the same court, we have noted, VoL I. p. 150, as also that of Mr. James Skeff as a transgressor in bring- ing these worthy persons to Sandwich. Again, at the same court, * Edward Freeman, Richard Kerby, George Slawson, Peter Gaunt, John Dingley, and Mr. Stuteley, all of Sandwich, were fined 10 s. each, for being deficient in arms.” The very same court deemed it important to have the limits of the lands granted in Sandwich ac- curately defined, “with ad convenient speed;” and directed Mr. Alden and Captain Standish to attend to the duty. And now, the next year, 1639, was a time of great trouble — complaint being made against Sandwich for receiving persons as inhabitants, who were “ unfit for church-society.”1 The “committies” were “summoned 1 If we would estimate the partiality to some and the rigorous exactions upon others, or the moral “ fitness n of those who were thus brought in con- flict with the civil authorities, we are constrained in candor to consider the obliquities of the age. However much we venerate the leading puritans, we cannot be blind to the fact that in their desire to keep out and to weed yol. H. 642 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. to answer,” were “forbidden to dispose of any more land,” and Captain Standish and Mr. Prince were ap- pointed to repair to Sandwich clothed with full power to order for the public good! Butwe turn gladly from these proceedings, leaving the astute to explain these matters. The same year, “George Allen ” was “ admitted a freeman, and appointed and sworn as constable of SandwichJohn Blakemore was “appointed to exercise the inhabitants of Sandwich in the use of arms;” John Didicut “presented himself before the Court to take the oath of allegiance; ” and, Nov. 28, “ Mr. William Paddy, merchant, of Plymouth, and Alice Freeman of Sandwich, were married.” It does not appear whether, in the latter case, it was necessary to resort to the court for the legalizing of the marriage contract; but we suppose it was. Sandwich, having this year received its legal incorpo- ration, was represented in the General Court1 There was, as we have seen, no House of Bepresentatives in the Colony of Plymouth until the present year. Com- mittees the representatives were first denominated, after- wards Deputies became the title. The two that were first chosen by this town were KichaRd Bourne and John Vin- cent.2 The whole number of towns in the Colony at this period, was, including the newly incorporated, but seven ; and the total number of deputies by whom they were collectively to be represented, was 16.3 out every thing heterodox according to their views, suspicion was always on the alert: “ Do I not know you for a favorer % Of this new sect i Ye are not sound.” 1 Whether Sandwich would have attained so suddenly to the honor, had not two other more recent settlements, whose principal men were from within the bounds of the Colony, been applicants for incorporation, is questionable. 2 The notices of future election of deputies from time to time, will appear in the tables at the close. The changes in the Board of Assistants, so far as those magistrates were taken from this County, have already been noted in oui annals of the Cape. 2 It has already, in effect, been seen in the former volume, that, after the demise of Gov. Carver, Mr. Bradford being elected his successor, it wasANNALS OP SANDWICH. 43 After the incorporation of the town, the records for several years exhibit little of interest beyond what has already found a place in our general history of the Cape. Abundant evidence is found of the never tiring vigilance of the law and the impartiality of its admin- istration. A case that was before the Plymouth Court, March 1, 1642, furnishes proof to this effect: a military personage, prominent in this town and perhaps not thus early so distinguished for his religious character as in after life — at best not now entirely above sus- picion or exempt from the reach of legal discipline, stood charged with too great a degree of gallantry. We put the most favorable construction on the affair though the “ complaint ” was a very serious one; for there appears nothing in his previous or subsequent career to deprive him of this leniency.1 judged expedient to appoint also an Assistant to the Gov. The reason for this, in the first instance, was found in the fact that the Gov. elect was just recovering from sickness and needed assistance; but the office was continued for other reasons, so that, in 1624, five assistants were chosen, and in 1633 two more were added. The number thenceforward chosen an- nually was seven; and the Gov. and Assistants were the Supreme Judiciary power — which arrangement continued until the time of Andros. Mr. Ed- mund Freeman, of Sandwich, was elected by the Colony an Assistant soon after the incorporation of the town, and by successive elections filled the office seven consecutive years. The change which now took place in the govt., substituting a representative govt, for an actual democracy, was an important event. It was, as had been the appointment of assistants, an affair of convenience alone; the extension of tne settlements rendering it altogether inconvenient for the whole people to meet in one place as often as exigencies might arise, to legislate; and hence, to distribute the power in fair and equal proportions, it seemed necessary to delegate it — vesting in the deputies of the several towns the power which belonged to all to exercise in person as a legitimate right. The transition, therefore, occasioned but little remark. Indeed the whole process of the organization of govern- ment from the very first, appears to have been the result of convenience rather than of any preconceived and well-digested design; and a directing and .overruling Providence is clearly visible in every step of the progress made. Professing to desire religious freedom, our fathers, notwithstanding any peculiar obliquities or inconsistencies that to us of the present day may seem to have marked their views or action, established on its broad base, civil liberty. As Mr. Baylies has observed, “Meaning to found a church, they gave birth to a nation; and in settling the towns, they commenced an empire.” 1 We think it but fair to infer from various circumstances—especially the charge being so general, that a degree of gallantry only incompatible44 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1643, the following persons, between the age of 16 and 60, were liable to bear arms: viz. Francis Allen, George Allen Jr., Matthew Allen, Ralph Allen, Samuel Allen, John Bell,1 Edmund Berry, Anthony Bessy, Miles Black, John Blakemore, Thomas Boardman, Robert Bodfish, Richard Bourne, George Buitt, Richard Burgess, Thomas Burgess Sr., Thomas Burgess Jr., Thomas Butler, Richard Chadwell, Edmund Clark, Henry Cole, Edward Dillingham, Henry Dillingham, John Dingley, John Ellis, Henry Feake, John Fish, Jonathan Fish, Nathaniel Fish, William Newland, Thomas Nichols, Benjamin Nye, John Presbury,4 Henry Sanderson, Henry Sephen, Edmund Freeman Sr., Thos. Shillingsworth, Edmund Freeman Jr., James Skiff, John Freeman,2 Peter Gaunt, Thomas Gibbs, John Green, Thomas Greenfield, Joseph Holway, Peter Hanbury, John Johnson,8 Thomas Johnson,8 John Joyce, Richard Kerby, George Knott, Thomas Landers, William Swift, Thomas Tupper, Michael Turner, * John Vincent, Nathaniel Willis, Lawrence Willis, Joseph Winsor, Daniel Wing, John Wing, Stephen Wing, William Wood, Anthony Wright,5 Nicholas Wright,5 Mr. William Leverich, Peter Wright.5 John Newland, with the stem views of the pilgrims, was the maximum summum of the offence; although the complaint preferred was u for lascivious and unclean carriages towards the wife ” of a man in “Yarm., and sundry others in Barn- stable and elsewhere.” The vocabulary of those days must be considered in estimating the importance to be attached to such a charge which standing prominently on the record would seem otherwise to require some heavier sentence than “ admonition.” 1 Went to Yarm. ab. 1657, and d. prob. abt. 1676. 2 Mr. John Freeman removed early to Eastham, accompanying Gov. P., whose daughter he married. His possessions here were at Ploughed Neck and Scorton Neck. See Vol. I. pp. 601, 618. 8 These both disappear from the records early; but their descendants are prob. found on the Cape. Thomas by w. Priscilla, had Priscilla Nov. 20, 1657; and William June 9, 1659, who prob. removed to Falmouth. 4 Mr. John Presbury was buried May 9,1648; but no record is found of his family. 5 The three Wrights were here in 1637. Peter had children b., viz.: Peter Feb. 28,1651; and Adam Mar. 20,1652. Nicholas had Mercy b. 1651. There are records of burials of children 1648 and 1649, Mordecai and Wm. In 1653 a deed by the Sachem of Oyster Bay, L. 1., to Peter Wright, Mr. Leveridge and others, witnessed by Anthony Wright, shows their final location.ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 45 However much to be regretted is the paucity of material furnished by early records for memoirs of towns, there is much to show that the people here did not regard the institutions of religion as unimportant. As already intimated, at an early period care was taken to provide a place for public worship. That the build- ing should in 1644 be called “ the old meeting-house,” is presumptive that it had been for some time in exist- ence ; and the inference also is that the question before the people was whether to build a new meeting-house, or repair the old one. The latter was their conclusion; and it does not appear to have been a very expensive job.1 We incline to the opinion that the first structure was rudely temporary, hitherto without shingles, with shutters for windows, and with thatched roof; such was the early practice elsewhere. Geo. Allen was this year “licensed by the court to cut hay at the Ponds beyond Sandwich-Plains.” The necessity for a ‘ license’ thus obtained, is perhaps explained by the prohibition that had been laid upon the committee or undertakers; since we find that the following year, 1645, an effort was made to procure the removal of the disability; and^in 1646 provision was made for “ yielding-up the land undisposed of, to the town, to be given forth and disposed of” on certain stipulated conditions.2 In 1647, Mr. Leverich was in court in consequence of some mis- understanding with a parishioner; but in no way involving the pastor’s integrity so far as we can judge. — An old settler and 1 The record is: “A town-meeting, 6 mo. 7,1644, warned by order of the selectmen to take course for repairing the meeting-house; whereupon divers persons engaged freely to pay in good and merchantable Indian com, the next April, unto Thos. Tupper, for as many bolts as would shingle the old meeting-house. The persons that engaged the com to Thos. Tupper of Sandwich, for and in consideration that the said Thos. Tupper engage the bolts aforesaid for repairing the said house; the persons that engaged the com are as followeth: — Edmund Freeman, 10 s. j Thos. Dexter, 10; Thos. Gibbs Sr., 9; Ezra Perry, 9; Jacob Burge, 9 ; Thos. Tobie Sr., 7 ; and William Bassett, 6.” 2 The rigid surveillance that was exercised over the disposal of lands by those whose right vested in them as undertakers, was not confined to this town. Great care was taken by the court that in every place those only who were “Jit-persons” within the dose construction of that qualifying phrase, should be landholders.46 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. his wife, who were afterwards conspicuous among the seceders from the 4 old ways of the puritans,5 were also arraigned 44 for hav- ing been carnal before matrimony.551 — The next year, another citizen was summoned before the court, and forbidden to show attentions to a certain female “ until the court can better discern the truth of his pretensions.55 2—The miller also shared—what has been the fate, perhaps often without cause, of many who grind for toll —44 a suspicion ;55 but, we are happy to say, 44 he was cleared— This same year, 1648, records the decease of prominent citizens, Mr. George Allen Sr.,8 and George Knott.4 1 The application of the criminal law to some cases then alleged to be flagrant immoralities too intolerable to be passed by without reprehension, would itself hardly pass without reprehension at the present day. The mortification and disgrace inflicted by the above complaint—the charge founded alone on evidence furnished long after marriage by a birth occur- ring “ before the ordinary time of women after marriage ” — would hardly be tolerated even did the law sanction the proceeding and the severity of the penalty. 2 There is some ambiguity here, but investigation shows that the young man “ was prohibited by tne court from visits or addresses ” to the fair damsel, “ until some matters are cleared up in regard to the contract:99 the incident is another confirmation of “ our William’s ” remark,— “ The course of true love never did run smooth.” The cause, in the present case, we are unable to pronounce j perhaps it was “ * different in blood; ’ Or else ‘ misgraffed in respect of years ; * Or else * it stood upon the choice of friends.’ ” This much we know: her father, in his dying moments, had supposed that the two were betrothed, and had mad# provision for their mutual comfort, in his will; and yet she soon married another. 3 Mr. Allen was in Lynn 1636, and came to Sandwich 1637. He was a deputy 1641 and ’42. The record says he was buried in S., May 2, 1648. His will mentions “ sons Matthew, Henry, Samuel, William, and also five least children.” It makes his wife Catharine executrix. He must have been aged, as various accounts intimate. If we are to regard the specula- tions extant, it is difficult at this remote period to account for the omission of the names of some generally regarded as his sons, and especially of some who were older than those named. He is represented by Bowden as having been an “ anabaptist in England.” Be this as it may, he was a member of the church in Sandwich, and Rev. Mr. Fessenden reports both George and Half Allen as having been previously members of the church in Roxbury. There was a George Jr. in S. liable to bear arms in 1643, and also a Francis and Half, as well as Matthew. George Jr. was m. before the decease of George Sr., as was also Ralf, and almost contemporaneously appears a Ralf Sr. and Ralf Jr. We suspect that genealogists have confounded two families. Records are the only sure guide. 4 Mr. Knott, one of the original grantees, was buried May 3, 1648. His will, nuncupative, bearing date May 1, mentions “my wife Martha, also my son Samuel and my dr. Martha; ” and also indicates some provis- ion for “ Thos Dunham in case he marries my daughter.” The name is not perpetuated in this town. The wid. of Mr. K. d. 1673. His son, Samuel, was in the Indian war, and the records of Gorham, Me., 1733, show thatANNALS OF SANDWICH. 47 We have had occasion to infer that the ancient house for public worship in this town was not a very costly edifice; by an inkling obtained from the records of 1650, it may be surmised that the minister had no very sumptuous accommodations. As is the cathedral so is usually the primate’s residence. It was “ agreed upon by the town that there shall be a levie of £5 for Mr. Leveridge, to pay for removing and parting of his house with boards, which was long since promised to be done for him by the town.” If he had hitherto submitted to occupy the shell of a house without apartments, we can but admire his patience in waiting the fulfilment of the contract. The board partitions “ long-promised,” must, if erected— and we have reason to suppose they were in due time, for the work was com- mitted to four good men and true, viz.: “ Mr. Vincent, William Newland, Thomas Tupper, and Robert Bodfish” — have been convenient both to himself and family.1 A levy of £10 was also ordered “ for defraying the town-charges;” and it was “agreed to pay Mr. Richard Bourne £1 and his levie (so much as he is rated in the £10 levie) in consideration of his labor and pains that he hath taken in business concerning the town, as in selling the lands to satisfy the committies and the like.’’ The public expenses do not appear to have been very onerous, if we except the matter of fines for petty delinquencies and costs of court; and the pecuniary resources of the town were probably not abundant. In 1651, “the conditions on which the grant of the township was made having been fulfilled, a deed of the “ Samuel Tobey is put down for his uncle Samuel Knott, deceased.” The daughter m. Thos. Tobey, Nov. 18, 1650. 1 All contemporaneous records and correspondence show that there was thus early, in both colonies, “ a lamentable remissness ” in the honorable support of religious institutions. There is no positive evidence, at least none direct, that the people here were particularly reprehensible in^ this respect; probably they were not, bating what is attributable to unintentional neglect.48 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. plantation was executed by Gov. Bradford to Mr. Edmund Freeman who made conveyances to his associates.”1 The same year, May 22, it was “ordered that these four men, Goodman Tupper, Goodman Burge Sr, NathL Willis, and Wm. Gifford shall have power to call a town-meeting by giving three days’ warning, whenever they see occasion for the same;” and the following very notable restriction was duly “ voted, that what neighbors stay away above an hour after the time appointed shall lose their votes in what is done before they come.” It was “ also ordered that the constable give in his account for the current year, or else shall stand another year as constable.” This year was not the end of “the beginning of ecclesiastical troubles,” as all New England history tells; but it is worthy of note here, that even this date was several years prior to the itinerant influence of any of “ the people called Quakers.” The “ religious distractions [which] now began to exist all over the colony,” cannot, then, be attributed, as is the manner of some, to the Friends. These troubles already exist- ing prepared the way, no doubt, for the introduction of new views — such as might plausibly be presented to the disaffected towards the policy of the government; but the dissensions themselves are attributable to causes which must be looked for in the doings of former years.2 The record made by a distinguished antiquarian, that 1 The bounds are the same described in the subsequent deed confirmato- ry in 1685, as* originally established by Capt. Miles Standish and Mr. John Alden. 9 The movement in favor of religious toleration, a few years previous, had, although unhappily opposed by government, stout advocates — and, if we may judge from the now existing state of things, there were conscien- tious ana unyielding friends of religious freedom, in this town. The orders of court to compel attendance on the only tolerated public worship; the presentments of many, and the fines and penalties imposed; the charges now becoming frequent, against divers persons here and there, of “ speak- ing deridingly against God’s word and ordinances” — charges that were grounded on the least expression of dissent from prevailing dogmas and polities j and the complaints of the “disturbance of public worship” — com- plaints that were equally founded on constructive grounds, were but the symptoms of a conscientious, determined, and serious contest, the cause of which may be expressed in brief, but the history of which would require volumes.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 49 it is “not known why Mr. Edmund Freeman,” after seven years’ service as an assistant, “ was dropped,” is at least suggestive. We think the reason is patent. Our surprise the rather is that his election was not at the first opposed by the government, notwithstanding the position he held in society. His views were too liberal for the age. The right of private judgment,1 and the right of petition, were principles not to be maintained with impunity even by puritans who hap- pened to be in advance of the exclusiveness of the times. — Mr. Kobert Bodfish died this year, Nov. 19. In 1652, Jan. 17, a further order was passed regulating “ the manner of calling town-meetings; ”—and Mar. 12, it was “ agreed that the Town-Neck shall still be used for pasturage as formerly from May 1 to Oct. 4, and that no cattle except calves shall be put in without the consent of the town— an “agreement was 1 That the settlers here and in the adjacent towns were generally homo- geneous is evident; but that there should from the first settlement of the colony have been, notwithstanding every precaution, the accession or infu- sion of some whose views were not fully in sympathy with those of the rigid puritan, is not strange; nor that others should feel that there was just cause for complaint and express dissatisfaction at what they considered the exclusiveness and arbitrariness of the ruling powers. Hence, the occasional, but always cherished, avowed desire for the initiation of a better order of things. Mr. Morrell, when he saw the existing feeling, as early as 1624, meekly forbore to assert his rights, or even to make known the position that had been assigned him. Episcopalians were, from the first, suspected and feared. The Anabaptists, it was alleged significantly by one whose “ sagacity ” excited his fears, were “ an engine formed to cut the throat of the infantry of the churches.” As time advanced, intolerance became less and less tolerable. The movements of Mr. Vassel of Scituate, and of Mr. Maverick and Dr. Child in the Mass. Colony, were but the symptoms and evidence of progress that was being made. They complained that persons, though “ sober, righteous, and godly,” and even those “ eminent for knowl- edge, not scandalous in life or conversation, and members of the Church of England,” were “debarred from Christian privileges,” and “denied civil privileges.” They alleged that “ the fundamental laws of England were not owned by the colony as the basis of government according to the Patent.” And they “ prayed that civil liberty and religious freedom might forthwith be granted; or, that if these civil and religious liberties were refused, they might be freed from the heavy taxes imposed.” If their prayer should be granted, they expressed the hope of seeing “ the ordinances of God highly prized, the gospel break forth as the sun, Christian charity wax warm, jealousy banished, strife and contention abated,” &c. &c. The petition gave great offence. The petitioners were called to account. Still, they stoutly asserted their right of petitioning: but in vain! — The sequel is by and by. vol. n. 750 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. made with Daniel Wing and Michael Blackwell for the taking of the fish in Herring-river; ” — and it was tt ordered that Edmund Freeman, Edward Perry, Geo. Allen, Daniel Wing, John Ellis, and Thos. Tobey, these six men, shall take care of all the fish that Indians shall cut up within the limits of the town, so as to provide safety for it, and shall dispose of the fish for the town’s use;1 also that if any man that is an inhabitant shall find a whale and report it to any of these six men, he shall have a double share; and that these six men shall take care to provide laborers and whatever is needful, so that whatever whales either Indian or white man gives notice of, they may dispose of the proceeds to the town’s use, to be divided equally to every inhabitant.” The court subsequently appointed “ agents to receive the oil for the country.”2—The court having ordered a way to be laid out from Sandwich to Plymouth, appointed Messrs. Anthony Thach- er, Thomas Dexter, Thos. Hinckley, Win, Hedge, Edward Bangs, Joseph Rogers, John Wing, John Ellis, Henry Dillingham, James Skeff, John Finny, Jonathan Hatch, and Wm. Bassett, to attend to the duty. — The court also directed the constable of Sandwich to “ call on Lt. Wm. Newland to train the military company; and, if he refuse, to appoint the Sergeant, Peter Wright, to do it.”3 The town tt ordered that every inhabitant shall bear his part concerning the trial of the action about Eel-river bridge; and that Thos. Dexter Sr. be authorized to answer in court for the town.” — Also “ that Goody Bodfish shall have four bu. of wheat due the town from Geo. Allen.”4 In 1653, the town provided “ for the purchase of muskets, cut- lasses, powder, balls, drum,” &q.;—also “that no man shall cut timber on the commons’ lots to sell out of town, under a penalty of 5 s. for every tree cut; ” — further, “ that Mr. Dillingham, Thos. Tupper, Mr. Yincent, and Richard Bourne shall forthwith make a rate of £34 to be paid in butter or current money;” — also “ that the pay of all whales shall belong to every householder and to 1 All the larger fish yielding oil are meant. So numerous were whales in the bay, and such was the activity of the whalemen, that instances were frequent of whales, escaping wounded from their pursuers and dying sub- sequently, being washed to the shores. Besides these, the grampus and other large fish were often stranded on the flats by the action of the tides. 2 This, taken in connection with the town’s doings, indicates a diversity of views in regard to the rightful claimants of the oil obtained from drift whales ; the colony demanding it as belonging to the crown. 3 Variances between England and Holland now gave cause for alarm. 4 She was now a widow, and probably in necessitous circumstances.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 51 every young man that is his own, equally.”1 The deputy, Mr. Wm. Newland, was fined for not attending the Gen. Court; and Mr. Wm. Bassett Sr., for not attending to an order from the Council of War.—John Ellis received appointment as Lt. of the military. An order was passed requiring all swine going at large, to be “ringed and yoked;” also “for the impounding of cattle.” — It was also “ agreed that Mr. Leverich only shall have leave to put his horse in the Town-Neck.” How soon after this Mr. Leverich left Sandwich does not appear further than that in 1654, he in company with several of his parishioners became a purchaser and settler at Oyster Bay, L. I., and was there voted £15 salary by the settlers, as their minister.2 There, 1 The contest for the right of whales seems to have been carried on with vigor. It was further ordered, Sept. 13, “ that Richard Chadwell, Thos. Dexter, and John Ellis, these three men, shall have all the whales that come up within the limits and bounds of Sandwich, they paying to the town for the sd. fish £16 a whale.” It was also “ provided that if any of these three men have notice given them by any person who has seen a whale ashore or aground and has placed an oar by the whale, his oath may, if required, be taken for the truth and certainty of the thing, and the sd. three persons shall be held liable to pay for the sd. whale although they neglect to go with him that brings them word. And if they do not go with him, then sd. person shall hold the sd. whale, and by giving notice to any third man shall have paid him for his care herein £1. And in case there come ashore any part of a whale, these four men, Mr. Dillingham, Mr. Edmund Free- man, Edward Perry, and Michael Blackwell, are to be the judges of the whale before it shall be cut off from, to determine the quantity less a whole whale; and then, without allowing further word, those three men, viz.: Rd. Chadwell, Thos. Dexter, and John Ellis, shall make payment for sd. whale, i in oil, i in corn, and j in cattle, all marketable, at current prices,” &c.&c. * In the Hist, of L. I., it is said, “ Very many went from Sandwich to L. I. in 1653-4.” The Hist, of Newtown, L. I., says, “ In 1652 a company from New Eng. obtained leave from director Stuyvesant, to plant a town within his jurisdiction. Among these persons was Lt. Palmer, who had represented Yarmouth in the Gen. Court of Plym. Colony in 1644 and as late as 1651; Mr. Henry Feare who was early at Lynn and had leave to build and plant at Nahant 1635, but removed to Sandwich in 1637 ; and Jonathan Fish his associate who also came to Mespat, i. e. Newtown.” We may add, there is no doubt that Mr. Fish removed thus early to Oyster Bay, and that he finally became a resident at Mespat. His habitancy in the latter place in 1659 was fixed. He was there a magistrate and a person of character and property. He had sons, John, Samuel, and Nathan; and d. in 1663, leaving a widow Mary and sons. These were all patentees of Newtown in 1686. John finally went to New Jersey, and from thence his descendants scattered abroad. Samuel d. in 1700, without issue. Nathan remained at Newtown, and had 14 children. — Mr. Feake was one of the ten men who projected the settlement of Sandwich, and was deputy of this town, 1643—4. He had a bro. Robert who was in Watertown in 1630, in Flushing, L. I., in 1650, and whose son Robert was a preacher of some celebrity among the Friends.52 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. and at Huntington and Newtown, he doubtless spent the rest of his life,1 if we except the portion which is, without very good authority, said to have been occu- pied in the duties of a missionary among the Indians.2 In 1654, Jan. 26, “the town gave full power to Mr. Edward Dillingham and Richard Bourne, to agree in the town’s behalf with Thos. Dexter to go on and build the mill.”3 — The town also gave “ to the widow Bodfish liberty to put into the Town- Neck, three of her cattle, besides calves.” — A committee, consist- ing of “ Mr. Dillingham, Goodman Tupper, Goodman Bourne, Wm. 1 The date of the decease of Mr. Leverich is involved in some obscurity by the errors of writers whose investigations were evidently made with very little care. One account says, “ He d. in 1692,” and that “ he was pastor in Sandwich 1638, and in 1647 was a missionary” But the fact that his estate was adm. on June 19, 1677, is conclusive on this point. He left sons Caleb and Eleazar. The Annals of Long Island say, “ He was charged with having introduced, whilst in Sandwich, some novelties in celebrating the Eucharist.” Mr. L. having been in the ministry of the Church of England, it is probable that the “ novelties ” spoken of, were but the formularies of the Episcopal Church in administering the holy communion. The Rev. Mr. Fessenden says, in a letter addressed soon after his ordination, to Rev. Thos. Prince, that Mr. L. was involved in trouble in Sandwich “ by the utterance of views of infant baptism disapproved of by some portion of his hearers.” 2 We find conflicting reports touching the scenes of his ministerial labors. One says, “ He was a missionary to the Indians, and much engaged in instructing them in 1647; ” another says, “ 1657,” and that “ he was employed in this service by the commissioners of the United Colonies.” Mr. Baynes, usually accurate, says, “ In 1674, Mr. Leverich resided in Nantucket, prob- ably a missionary — Nantucket being then within the jurisdiction of the Province of N. York.” But the L. Island Annals are doubtless reliable. That Mr. Leverich went to L. Island from Sandwich is corroborated by the fact we have mentioned Yol. I. p. 209, that in 1653-4, a vessel belonging to Sami. Mayo of Barnstable, employed in conveying the goods of Mr. L. to Oyster Bay, was seized at Hampstead Harbor by the authorities of Rhode Island; an interference requiring the interposition of the Plymouth Colony. The Probate records show that he died there in 1677. Other concurrent testimony induces the belief that L. I. was the scene of his labors after leav- ing Sandwich. 3 There must have been a mill for the breaking or grinding of corn in this town previous to 1648, as we have seen. — The first “ water-mill for the beating out of corn ” set up in Plym. in 1632, and soon after superseded by “ a grinding-mill,” was the only convenience the early settlers here had, for a long time, for turning their grain to meal, except as afforded by the slow and laborious process employed by the Indians — the mortar and pestle. Tradition still points out the course of the old Indian path-way by which the inhabitants of Sandwich at first conveyed their grists, on their backs often, sometimes on the back of a horse, bull, or cow, to Plym. It is not strange that great concern should be felt to secure so great a boon as a mill near at hand; and yet of the precise time when the first was erected in Sandwich, we have no means of ascertaining; nor do we understand the immediate necessity now for another mill unless the old one had failed to answer its end. Great difficulties seem to have attended the fulfilment of the design in the present instance.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 53 Newland, and Thos. Dexter, was app., May 13, to frame a petition to the worshipful Court at Plymouth, for a grant to purchase, and assistance in purchasing Manomet The arrangement with Dexter for building a mill having failed, “John Ellis, Wm. Swift, Wm. Allen, and James Skef£ were engaged to build the mill, the town paying £20,” which sum was at once voluntarily subscribed by the following persons, viz.: Edmund Freeman, Danl. Wing, Benj. Nye, Ralph Allen Jr., Geo. Allen, Thos. Tobey, Hy. Dillingham, Mich. Blackwell, Rt. Harper, Hy. Saunders, Thos. Gibbs, John Burgiss,1 John Fish, < Matthew Allen, Frs. Allen, Anthony Bessy, Jos. Winsor, Thos. Ewer, Rd. Smith, Peter Gaunt, Thos. Butler, and Wm. Bassett. Every town being required by law to procure a book for recording divisions and purchases of lands, these lands to be duly bounded to prevent disputes, the town complied, and such record was begun. The state of travel at this period, may be appre- hended from the fact that the road ordered by the Gen- eral Court, to be laid out from Plymouth to Sandwich, and for which service commissioners had been appointed, was not yet constructed. Both "Plymouth and Sand- wich were presented for not having the country high- way between these places cleared so as to be passable for man and horse”2 Early in 1655, the mill would seem to have been completed, for the following entry appears May 18: “ The town hath agreed with 1 The name of John Burge, who was s. of Thomas 1st, is, after 1657, found in Yarmouth. See annals of that town. 2 The first evidence of an " Express ” in this direction, if we except the occasional services of the swift-footed Indians previous to any settlement on the Cape, is a record this year of “ money paid to John Smith, by the Gov- ernment at Plym., for conveying letters to Nawsett." We may not detail every incident of early days, especially those least important; but inasmuch as Robt. Ransom, the servant of Thos. Dexter Jr., without doubt aspired to immortality in common with others, and as the only chance we have to accord to his aspirations is the present, it may be mentioned that his complaint was before the court, of “ill-treatment;"but the servant “ was reproved by the court," as was “ also Nathaniel Fish for enticing him and thus encouraging his stubbornness."54 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Matthew Allen to grind and have the toll for his pains.” But yet again, May 29, another mill was contemplated: “Thos. Dexter engaged to build a mill, and the town engaged to allow him 5 pts. per bush, toll; he to build and maintain the mill and dam, and all other things thereto belonging; and to provide a miller at his own cost” — The town appointed “Mr. Dillingham and Thos. Dexter to make a rate of so much as will bring the town out of debt ” The rate was made and “ committed to Thos. Wing, con- stable.”— The following record also appears: “The train-band hath jointly agreed, as well masters for their servants and fathers for their sons, to give, each, a peck of wheat,1 or two lbs. of butter, to send one whom the Lt. shall appoint,” for military equipments, &c. A new meeting-house was now thought to be absolutely neces- sary, as appears by the following record: “ These several persons have fully and freely engaged themselves to the building of a place for public meetings, to give, Wm. Newland, £2. 0. Wm. Allen, £0.10. Mich. Blackwell, 1. 0. Lt. Ellis, .15. Thos. Gibbs, 1. 0. John Jenkins, . 1. James Skiffe, 1. 0. Thos. Butler, . 5. Wm. Bassett, .10. Edm. Freeman Jr , .10. Thos. Dexter, 1. 0. John Smith, .10. Ralph Allen Sr., .10. Thos. Johnson, . 5. Ralph Allen Jr., .10. Thos. Tobey, . 5. Thos. Borgis Sr., .10. Tho. Brookfield, . 8. Anthony Bessie, .10. Mr. Dillingham, . 5. Richd. Burge Jr., . 5. Ezra Perry, . 5. Thos. Burgess Jr., 1. 0. Rt. Harper, . 5. Matt. Allen, . 5. Mr. Vincent, .10. Hy. Dillingham, .10. John Burges, .10. Benj. Nie, . 5. Mr. Freeman, I/O. Geo. Allin, . 5. Geo. Bliss, . 1. Frs. Allen, . 5. Wid. Knott and \ Hy. Sanderson, . 5. 2 drs. of Thos. V . 5.’ Wm. Swift, .15. Tobey, ) Rd. Kerby Jr., . 5. The following is among the entries of 1655-6, but 1 The growing of wheat in this town has, excepting occasional experi- ments, been long discontinued; but the late Wm. Fessenden Esq. once informed the writer that his parents had told him they had seen large crops of wheat covering the hills in Sandwich, since denominated ‘ the territories/ and now considered as fit only for pasturage.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 55 without date,1 and without superscription indicating to whom it was addressed; it may have been an invi- tation extended to some clergyman engaged as a temporary supply intervening the ministrations of Mr. Leverich and Mr. Smith:2 3 * * * uLoving Brother: “It is the earnest desire of our families with ourselves, all whose names are underwritten, that you may be encouraged by a clear call to continue and employ that spiritual gift and talent which God of his goodness and grace hath bestowed upon you; hoping that if it please the Lord to move your heart to answer us in our desire, we will not be backward to recompense your labors of love this year. “ Thomas Tupper, Edw. Dillingham, John Vincent, Anthony Bessie, James Skiff, Hy. Dillingham, Rd. Chadwell, Daniel Wing, Edm. Freeman, Nathl. Fish, Thos. Gibbs, Thos. Dexter, Thos. Johnson, Thos. Tobey, Wm. Swift, Jona. Willis,8 Mich. Blackwell, Joseph Winsor, Johana Swift.” 1 The two oldest Books of Record that are in possession of the town, were commenced well enough, and so continued for some time; but a habit at last prevailed on the part of succeeding clerks of deferring very little to the order of entries — these being made often as if the only care was to find somewhere a blank spot for the purpose. It is, therefore, difficult in some instances to determine to what period of time a particular entry belongs. The subsequent books are better arranged, though in some parts not with- out defects. The 3d voL is a fine specimen of ancient chirography. 2 According to traditions, or recollections of traditions, gathered by Rev. Mr. Fessenden soon after he removed to Sandwich, there was a long inter- val between the pastorates of Messrs. Leverich and Smith; and some por- tion of the time occasional preachers were had. He says, “ first Mr. Icha- bod Wiswall who removed nence to Sagadahoc and then went to sea, and after his return settled and died in Duxbury; and then Mr. Thos. Dally who removed to Yarmouth to one Mrs. Howes who administered to him in a consumption, but he died thereof.”—The precise interval is involved in much uncertainty. Mr. Fessenden’s traditions place the “ call and ordina- tion” of Mr. Smith as late as 1675. He says the church was long “ rent with sore divisions —the one part blaming tne other whose dissatisfactions drove Mr. L. away,” and the others “ falling into the errors of Quakerism,” some of whom had before “ become very much tainted with Antinomian and Familistical errors under the ministry of Stephen Batchelor the first min- ister of Lynn.” 3 The Willis family became finally extinct in town by removals. Mr. Thomas Willis who was a deputy of Lynn 1634, was in this town in 1637. Nathaniel was here early and had Elnathan May 20, 1639, Judith June 14,1641; Bethia Sept. 14,1643; and Mary Ap. 14,1648. In 1656 he was56 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. It is difficult to account for the absence of several prominent names to the above call—especially the names of Mr. Richard Bourne and Mr. Thomas Burge, who were church-members. Tradition, as reported by Mr. Fessenden at the time of his settlement some four- score years after, says, “A most unhappy dissension occurred in the church about the time that Mr. Leverich left.” Mr. L. he represents as leaving behind him the character “for great piety and meekness,” and as “ seeking a quiet recess at Long Island ” in consequence of the “jealousy and uneasiness” that certain persons “ had conceived towards him, they being implacable.”1 All this is very probable; for all history unites in de- claring that the spirit of insubordination had already become generally rife in the whole Colony, as in that of the Massachusetts; and that the resort to severe enactments and various devices was altogether insuffi- cient to quell it is evident on every side. The people every where had not only become clamorous for the largest religious freedom, but the chafed spirits of the proscribed forbade the hope of a speedy return to a degree of quiet and decorum essential to good neigh- borhood. It were strange if the excitement of the times had not reached this town. A diversity of views had resulted even among such as before were harmo- niously united in the laudable desire to sustain regular ministrations as well as to have the just and equal rights of all recognized and maintained. Evidence is found of the existence of such a state of things here, in in Bridgewater. Laurence was here early, but removed to Bridgewater in 1656. Jonathan also removed at the same time. The three last were brothers of Dea. John of Duxburjr who was one of the proprietors of Bridgewater. From these were derived those of the name at Acushnet and Rochester. 1 Mr. Fessenden’s traditions are that Wm. Newland, Peter Gaunt, Rich- ard Kerby, John Newland, Ralph Allen, and Geo. Allen, were the “ impla- cable ” opponents of Mr. L.ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 57 numerous instances that must now for a time checker our narrative of public transactions. Peter Gaunt of Sandwich, being called upon by the court at Plymouth “ to answer for not frequenting the public worship of God, affirmed that he knew no public visible worship; ” and “ Ralph Allen ” took similar ground;1 whilst “ Geo. Allen,” who was arraigned for the same offence, “ dissented ” from the views of the preceding, but had other excuses; and “ Sarah, daughter of Rd. Kerby,” arraigned “ for divers suspicious speeches uttered against Mr. Rd. Bourne and Mr. Edm. Freeman, was reprimanded and sentenced to be publicly whipped if the offence was repeated.”2 In 1656, July 29, “ Mr. Edmund Freeman, Thos. Borgis, Rd. Chadwell, Mr. Dillingham, Mr. Vincent, and others were appoint- ed, according to court order, to do, as the court hath ordered, for the town in determining the bounds of the lands — that the same may appear on record.” — It was also “ agreed that the 26 acres that Barnstable hath upon Scauton-Neck, shall be purchased.”3 This year is marked by the first arrival in America of any of “ the people called Quakers.” 4 1 Let it be remarked here that hitherto there had been no arrival from abroad of any of “ the people called Quakers.” Whether the position taken by these two men was inconsequence of knowledge of the views of that order or people then making progress in England and also in Barbadoes, we have no means of determining. The probability, however, is that such was the fact. Reports of the proceedings of the Friends in England had reached this country, and probably some of their writings; and their movements abroad were a general topic of conversation among the magistrates and clergy. * The presumption is that these men aspersed, were disposed to a con- servative course—such as is well-known were their character and influence; and, therefore, incurred the displeasure of the less moderate with whose general views of the impolity of intolerance perhaps their own were in unison; for Mr. Fessenden more than intimates Mr. Freeman’s disap- probation of ecclesiastical censures and legislative coercion. He gives us to understand that Mr. F. was even suspected of sympathizing with the Quakers, and “ afterwards left them upon a detection of some falsehood and villany among them, but never returned to special communion with the church.” The reason alleged by tradition for his finally standing aloof from the Friends is rather severe, and something, we trust, is here to be par- doned to the excitement of the hour; but the latter charge is probably incorrect, inasmuch as it will be seen that he was still a contributor to the support of the ministry. Sarah Kerby, as will appear from*various trans- actions, had a flippant tongue and made herself quite conspicuous by her zeal on many occasions. 8 The right of domain, on this part of the Neck, was the occasion of much trouble. 4 According to ‘ Bowden’s History of the Society of Friends in America, 2 vols., Lond. 1850 and 1854,’ this denomination “date their rise in 1644 in VOL. H. 858 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1657, the visit of Nicholas Upsall to this place, was the occasion of much commotion. We have already referred to this matter in our first volume.1 “ Complaint was now made that sd. Nicholas, Rd. Kerby,2 the wife of John Newland, and others, frequently meet at the house of Wm. Allen for worship.” — “ Complaint was also made to court, against Jane Saunders and Sarah Kerby for disturbance of public worship.” Although these complaints were sought from abroad, many of the inhabitants became involved in these troubles. By the following entry upon the town records, it ap- pears that some effort was still made to sustain the ordinary institutions of religion: — Leicestershire, Eng.; in Warwickshire, 1645; Nottinghamshire, 1646; Derbyshire, 1647; in adjacent counties, 1648-50; and Yorkshire, 1651. The year 1652 was marked by a very considerable enlargement of the soci- ety. And in 1655, the minds of some were drawn to visit the western world, and they proceeded to Barbadoes; and, in the Spring of 1656, to New England.” George Fox says, “ In 1656, truth broke forth in Ameri- ca.” Those who first came to the continent, were Mary Fisher and Anne Austin from Barbadoes. The next arrival was by a vessel from London; Christopher Holder, John Copeland, and six others, 6 mo. 7th, the same year. They had “ been brought here,” they said, “ in the will of God, hav- ing been made sensible of the cries and groans of His seed which was cry- ing unto Him for help and deliverance under cruel bondage.” In the same vessel with these last, came Rd. Smith of Long Island, who having gone to England on business, and now returning to Oyster Bay, had whilst in Eng- land been “ convinced.” This Rd. Smith, who “ was some time in Taun- ton,” had purchased of the Sachems a tract in the Narraganset country, and in 1643 had a trading-house where Warwick now stands; but, the Narra- ganset war breaking out, had retired to Long Island. He originated, says Roger Williams, “ from a very respectable family in Gloucestershire.” On returning from Eng., he was not only the compagnondu voyage of the above Friends, but “ professed with them.” 1 Bowden’s Hist, says, “ The first offence of this man was his having expressed his disapprobation of the law of Mass, against the Quakers.” He continues, “ This cruel law had been ostentatiously announced to the citizens of Boston, by beat of drum, and deeply affected the mind of this man, and he felt constrained to raise his voice m public disapprobation of the act.” But he further says that “ Upsall had supplied the Quakers imprisoned in Boston jail with refreshments, and had become a convert” Bowden further adds, " The hospitality of the kind-hearted people of Sand- wich, displeased the Governor. Upsall’s resolution not to leave Sandwich, it is supposed, received encouragement from the townsmen by whom the constabulary was restrained from enforcing the warrant.” 8 Mr. Rd. Kerby took the oath of fidelity at Dartm. in 1684; the pre- sumption, therefore, is that the family finally went in that direction.ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 59 “We whose names are hereunder written, do hereby engage ourselves to pay towards the minister’s support, yearly, the sev- eral sums as followeth — except as God by His Providence shall disenable us, or any of us remove out of Sandwich. July IT, 1657. Thos. Borgis Sr., £2. Geo. Buit, £0.15. James Skiff Sr., 1.10. Thos. Borgis Jr., .15. Rd. Chadwell, 1.10. Thos. Tobey, 1. Lt. Ellis, 1. Thos. Gibbs, 1. Edm. Freeman, 1. John Borgis, .15. Ezra Perry, .15. Rd. Smith, . 6. Benj. Nie, .15. Wm. Bassett, 1.” Who was the minister of the town at this time, it is impossible to decide. We have supposed that Mr. Smith commenced his labors here about this time; but the fact is doubtless otherwise, as will appear. The account of Lt, Ellis for drum, muskets &c. purchased was rendered, £10.6.7; and William Bassett, constable, rendered account of £26.13.9 rate including the disbursement of £9.15 for “ Indian-land purchase and £2.4.8 for wolf-traps.” In 1658, a record was made of lands bounded by Mr. Edmund Freeman Sr., Mr. John Vincent, Mr. Edw. Dillingham, Rd. Bourne, Rd. Chadwell, Thos. Burge, and Wm. Newland, appointed “to lay out and order the true bounds of every inhabitant’s lands, so that the lands may be brought to record according to the order of the court.” The owners were: Frs. Allen, Danl. Butler, Thos. Greenfield, Geo. Allen, Thos. Butler, Rt. Harper, Jedediah Allen, Rd. Chadwell, Joseph Holway, Ralph Allen, Thos. Dexter Sr., Edw. Hoxy, Wm. Allen, Hy. Dillingham, Lodo. Hoxie, Wm. Bassett, John Ellis Sr., John Jenkins, Neh. Bessie, John Ellis Jr., Thos. Johnson, Mich. Blackwell, Nat hi. Fish, Wido. Knott, John Bodfish, Wido. Fish, Thos. Landers, Rd. Bourne, Edm. Freeman Sr., John Newland, Sami. Briggs, John Freeman, Wm. Newland, Geo. Buit, Peter Gaunt, Benj. Nie, Jacob Burge, John Gibbs, Hy. Sanderson, Joseph Burge, Thos. Gibbs, James Skiff Sr., Thos. Burge Sr., Wm. Gifford, James Skiff Jr.,60 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Steph. Skif£ Thos. Tupper Sr., Danl. Wing, Rd. Smith, Thos. Tupper Jr., Steph. Wing, Wm. Swift, Mich. Turner, Joseph Winsor. Thos. Tobie, “ The town granted to Mr. Edmund Freeman, Jan. 17, on his release of the town, a tract of land.” — Thos. Tobey was “ com- missioned to pay to Indians 15 s. for every wolf killed by them.” — The first record of horse-marks was this year: “ the horse^mark of James Skiff.” — Mr. Thos. Hinckley of Barnstable was commis- sioned by the court “ to administer marriages in Sandwich, Barn- stable, and Yarmouth, by reason of their far distance from the magistrates.”—And James Skiff was appointed “to exercise the military.” The great difficulty in the town, was now, ostensibly, sympathy with u the Quakers; ” so that “ extraordinary circumstances rendering it expedient” a marshal was provided by the General Court, “ to do service in Sand- wich, Barnstable, and Yarmouth,” and George Barlow received the appointment for one year.1 Two of the English Friends, Christopher Holder and John Cope- land, as also Norton,2 were in the habit of frequenting 1 The office of Marshal, as also of Under Marshal, had been instituted June 3, 1652. But the extra marshalship created by the appointment of Barlow, was the result of the peculiar need in these several towns on the Cape at this particular juncture. * Bowden says, “ Holder and Copeland were in Sandwich, 20th of 6 mo., 1657; and their arrival was hailed with feelings of satisfaction by many who were sincere seekers after heavenly riches, but who had long been burdened with a lifeless ministry and dead forms in religion. To these, in the author- ity and life of the gospel the two Friends were enabled to offer the word of consolation and encouragement. But the town of Sandwich had its advo- cates of religious intolerance, and no small commotion ensued.” Again, in view of their return in defiance of the government, the same author says, “ Their gospel ministry had been instrumental in convincing many at this place of the principles of Friends. . . . The Gov. issued a warrant for their arrest as ‘ extravagant persons and vagabonds,* to be brought before him at Plym. A copy of the warrant was refused, whereupon Wm. Newland, at whose house the meetings of the newly convinced had been held, insisted that it was illegal thus to commit the strangers without acceding to their demand. A severe rebuke and a fine was the result of his operations.” The two prisoners after their sentence appear to have been taken back to Sandwich by Barlow, who had arrested them, for punishment; but Bowden relates, “ The selectmen whose duty it was to see mem whipped, entertained no desire to sanction measures so severe towards those who differed from them in religion, and declined to act in the case. The marshal then took them to Barnstable to a neighboring magistrate about two miles distant,ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 61 the place and holding their meetings. The convictions, fines, and other penalties for countenancing these men and others of the same persuasion, were many.1 We need not be surprised that, under these circumstances, many sympathizers became “converts?2 The refusal to take the oath of fidelity which was now required of all, augmented the hardships of which numbers com- plained.3 The removal of several members of the who he anticipated would lend a ready hand—an expectation which was fully realized. This functionary ordered them to be tied to a part of an out-house, and then turning executioner he gave each of them thirty-three lashes.” Holder is represented to have been a well-educated man. There is a tradition that meetings were still held, attended by large numbers, in a secluded spot in the woods; and that the place of resort has, therefore, been called 4 Christopher’s Hollow/ to this day. 1 Some who never adopted the peculiar tenets of the Friends, were among the sufferers. 2 Bowden claims that “ Wm. Newland and Ralph Allen were among the first.” The Newlands were “ of Irish extraction.” The Allens were “ of the family of Geo. Allen who had been an anabaptist.” He says, “ There were six brothers and sisters of Ralph, who joined the Friends. The father had laid down his head in peace before Friends had visited these parts. His children had resided upwards of twenty years in Sandwich and vicinity, and were much respected by their neighbors.”—We find it stated in 4 A Brief Account of Friends’ Meetings in New England,’ that 44 in 1658 no less than 18 families in Sandwich recorded their names In one of the documents of the Society.” —Rouse, writing to England at that day, says, 44 We have two strong places in this land, the one at Newport and the other at Sand- wich.” — Mr. Cudworth says, the same year, “ Almost the whole town of Sandwich is adhering towards them.” — And the ‘Records of Monthly Meetings of Friends,’ show that 44 the Sandwich Monthly Meeting was the first established in America; ” and this was before the year 1660 — before they had been generally established in England. 3 Many were summoned to Plymouth, and fined £5 each, for the refusal. Bowden records the following 44 distraints made about this period from Friends resident in and near Sandwich, to satisfy fines imposed: — Geo. Allen, £25.15.0. Hy. Howland, £ 1.10.0. Joseph Allen, 5.12.0. John Jenkins, 19.10.0. Matt. Allen, 48.16.0. Rd. Kerby, Jno. Newland, Wm. Newland, 57.12.0. Ralph Allen Sr., 68. 0.0. 2. 6.0. Ralph Allen Jr., 18. 0.0. 36. 0.0. Wm. Allen, 86.17.0. Edw. Perry, 89.18.0. Thos. Ewer, 25. 8.0. Mich. Turner, 13.10.0. Peter Gaunt, 43.14.6. DanL Wing, 12. 0.0. Wm. Gifford, Thos. Greenfield, Robt. Harper, 57.19.0. 4. 0.0. 44. 0.0. £660. 7.6.’ It is but sheer justice to the Friends to say, inasmuch as they have often been pronounced 44 stubborn and self-willed ” in these matters, that they claim as a substitute for such epithets credit for “ inflexible adherence to consci- entious conviction.” Their refusal to “ take oaths, perform military service,62 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. church at the close of the ministry of Mr. Leverich, and the more recent troubles, left the strength of the church much reduced. This state of things was not, however, peculiar to this town. Dr. Cotton Mather1 called this period “ the dark day of the Colony.” In 1659, “the difficulties growing out of the late commotions and distractions ” continued unabated. James Skiff, the town’s deputy, was rejected by the General Court on account of his friendship for his neighbors, the Quakers;2 and George Barlow, the mar- shal, was “ allowed by the Court to be a townsman.” Henry Dillingham, “for refusing to serve as constar ble, was fined £2 10.” William Leddra and Peter Pearson, ministers among the friends, were “ arrested at a religious meeting, carried to Plymouth and impris- oned.” And, June 7, “ the Court taking notice of Wil- liam Newland to be of such as, in the order that all freemen who are Quakers or such as do encourage them, shall lose their freedom,” ordered his appearance before them, and he “ was disfranchised.” A rate of £13 was “ ordered, to pay the demands of Plymouth for the construction of the bridge at Eel-river.” — The town app. “ John Ellis and James Skiff to take care of the whales and all other fish that yield oil in quantity; ” and, subsequently, sale was made to John Ellis of “ the right of all such fish coming within the limits and bounds of the town the next three years.” — A record was or- dered of “all moneys paid in by subscribers for tbe erection of the new meeting-house.”3 — An agreement was made with Rd. Smith, pay rates, &c., is,” says their apologist Clarkson, “ the result of an estab- lished rule not to temporize or violate conscience.” 1 In his Life of Rev. Sami. Newman who d. July 5, 1663, Dr. M. says, “ How many straits he underwent at Rehoboth in the dark day when he was almost the only minister whose invincible patience held out under the scandalous neglect and contempt of the ministry, which the whole colony of Plym. was for a while bewitched into ! ” * Several deputies of other towns—the entire minority, were “ set aside ” for the same cause. “ Such was the temper of the times.” 3 Besides the sums before mentioned as subscribed, Mr. Thos. Tupper is now credited £1. Credit is also given: “ Rec. also in Oil ”—probably the receipts from drift whale—“£3.3.10.” The building account seems im-ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 63 “ to keep cattle at Scauton, from May 1 to Oct. 30, he to yard and count them every night.”—Vm. Bassett was “licensed by the court to draw wines; ” and “John Ellis to keep an ordinary and sell strong waters and wines, only not to let town-dwellers stay drink- ing unnecessarily at his house.”—And Rd. Bourne, Rd. Chadwell, John Ellis, and Thos. Tupperwere commissioned “to meet at the house of Ralph Jones to run the line between Barnstable and Sandwich, in conjunction with agents appointed by the former town” — Mr. Daniel Wing d. this year. In 1660, the government having ordered that “ every town shall keep a troop of horse,” the town agreed with Wm. Bassett, Joseph Burge, and Stephen Skiff, “to provide, each man of them, a troop- ing-horse and furniture fit for the service; the horses to be pas- tured in Town-Neck, and themselves to be furnished with powder by the town ” And, June 18, it being “training-day, it was mutu- ally agreed by all that had paid in for the town’s powder, that there shall be delivered to each one of the military company that went to Yarmouth,1 2 lbs. of powder and what quantity more any person shall pay for at 18 d. pr. lb.” Fines “for attending Quaker meetings” are multi- plied. The marshal, Barlow, is “ protested against ” to the Court, as “ an unworthy man for office and a re- proach to the government.” He was, soon after, “fined 10 s. for causing Benjamin Allen to sit in the stocks the greatest part of a night without cause, and for other wrongs ” And yet, immediately after the imposition of this trivial fine for so grave offence, certain citizens not before implicated in the troubles, are fined heavily “ for refusing and neglecting to assist marshal Barlow in the execution of his office ; viz. Joseph Chandler, Richard Smith, and Nathaniel Fish. The marshal2 was perfect; but the following disbursements are mentioned: “ Pd. Benj. Nve and Thos. Tobey, for the frame, £12. Pd. Wm. Bassett for 500 great nails, £1. Pd. for freight of the butter and firkin of nails, 1 s. 1 d. Pd. Benj. Nye for 3 bu. corn, 9 s.” 1 The record says “ went; ” but shall go is probably intended; and the occasion was a general muster ordered by government. 2 Barlow was peculiarly unfortunate in his domestic relations. One daughter-in-law, and she a married woman, was arraigned “ for chopping her father in the back,” and fined £10 — “ the sentence being designed by the court to be light, she being with child.” And two others who stood in64 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. destined, however, to figure in other embroglios than those we have mentioned; for he was soon made con- spicuous also by his domestic infelicities. In 1661, occurred the first instance on the Cape, so far as the records supply, of divorce a vinculo mdrimonii We regret being obliged to say, the husband was an inhabitant of this town, and for the criminal acts that led to the divorce he was a fined and publicly whipt; ” nor did this punishment suffice — for his continued naughtiness he was “ whipped a second time,” and then disappears from the town. In 1662, “Thomas Dexter and Edm. Freeman the younger, were appointed to confer with the Barnstable committee and set- tle the dispute about fish.”1 In 1663, a grant was made by the town, of “ all the fish that come ashore within the town’s limits.”—It was “ordered that wild cattle running at large in the woods, be taken up by their owners before the 1st of May next; and that after, it shall be law- ful for any man to kill such cattle found at large, pay themselves for their pains, and give the owners the rest.” — It was “ordered, July 6, that the little neck of land that lies by Wm. Newland’s house, shall be appropriated as a burial-place for the town; and that £3.7.4 be paid from the town’s money now in the hands of James Skiff, without any more trouble.”2 In 1664, May 11, “Goodman Chadwell, Mr.Edm.Freeman, and Thos. Tobey were chosen to agree with Thos. Dexter Jr. for the grinding of the townsmen’s corn; and if they fail to agree, then 12 acres of the land at the river that comes out of the pond at the head of Benj. NTye’s marsh, shall be granted to any other of the townsmen that will set up a mill.”3 the relation of daughters to him, were before the court “ for like carriages towards their father-in-law,” and were “ sentenced to be set in the stocks,” which was accordingly done. Moreover, George himself and his wife, “ for ungodly living,” were before the court and “ were reproved.” — We have no desire to mention all his troubles or peccancies; and may, therefore, briefly remark, without citing subsequent instances, that he was, as before told, ‘ a bad fellow/ 1 Difficulties, unhappily growing out of a misunderstanding in regard to jurisdiction over Scorton Neck, were frequent. 2 This is what is now called ‘ the old burying-ground,’ surrounded on three sides by the pond in the central village. 3 This was, doubtless, at Spring HilLANNALS OF SANDWICH. 65 The religious dissensions were now less prominent, but had not ceased to be perplexing.1 In 1665, “ a controversy between Geo. Allen and Rcl. Chadwell having arisen in reference to a highway, Mr. Edm. Freeman Sr., Edm. Freeman Jr., Thos. Tobey, and Benj. Nye were appointed by the court to settle the matter.”—A casualty occurred, Aug. 19 — the death of Thos., son of Nathl. Fish, “ by the falling of a bank at the mill-dam.” The interposition of the Royal Commissioners, Feb. 22, was opportune, and the effect most happy. Re- ligious intolerance was, from this time, checked in good degree. In 1666, Messrs. Freeman, Bourne, Chadwell, Newland, and Burge, were “appointed to make an end of bounding men’s lands, to answer fully the order of court.” — James Skiff Jr., the consta- ble, was, on the complaint of Win. Bassett, amerced 10 s. and 1 We weary by such recitals, but have been as abstemious as consistency with a fair view of the existing troubles would warrant. We have consci- entiously endeavored to do the Quakers full justice; and may, perhaps, be thought to have amplified the injuries they received, unnecessarily to the damage of their persecutors. It is right that the cause of both parties should be fully presented. We have no sympathy with intolerance by whomsoever exercised; nor do we cherish any feeling worse than pity for ex- travagances that sometimes provoke persecution. No reasonable man can doubt that, in the heat of controversy, there were some egregious faults on both sides; we can neither utter one word in justification of intolerance and vindictiveness, nor can we fail to recognize in such facts as are found upon the records, even after the above date, to wit, that Robert Harper “ for his intolerably insolent conduct at Barnstable in railing against Mr. Wal- ley, and at Sandwich against Mr. Wiswall, was whipped,” and that Richard Willis “ for ribald speeches, was set in the stocks,” evidences of a prevalent spirit not according to the meekness of the Gospel of Christ. If we mis- take not, yearly ‘ Epistles' of ‘ Meetings of Friends/ tell how this spirit in some instances recoiled upon the Society itself. Let not such wrong be charged upon the Society, however; since the highest exponents of its principles and discipline have sternly rebuked it. For our own part, with one of these Epistles, nearly two centuries of age, lying before us, in which solemn reprobation is expressed of instances that “ seem to have discovered such a warmth of spirit and language that rather bore the complexion of madness of party ” — of “ the calling ” a high official “ an impudent man and pitiful governor, asking why he cud not send him to gaol since his back had long itched to be whipped; and calling another magistrate known to be a modest, peaceable man, an impudent rascal ” — of “ challenging dis- putes and waging them with heat and insults ” — and " at last charging Friends themselves that there were more damnable heresies and doctrines # of devils among Quakers than among any profession of Protestants ” — we are impressed with the importance of the due exercise of charity, and the cultivation of peace and quietness among all Christian people. VOL. h. 966 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. expenses, 44 for going to sd. Bassett’s house and taking away liquors without order.”1 In 1667, Dec. 12, 44 a full record of the bounds of all lands,” was completed.—Mr. Edward Dillingham Sr. d. this year;2 also Mr. Thos. Ewer and Lt. John Ellis. — That smuggling presented its temptations thus early is seen in the fact that Joseph Burge was fined £1 44 for disorderly helping away horses out of the colony.” Of 1668, we have nothing important to record. Quiet being restored by the wise influence of the Crown, events became less exciting. In 1669, Mar. 18, the 12 acres of land which the town gave to encourage the building of a mill, were laid out u at Little Pond.” — A shirt having been stolen, and sold by an Indian as was alleged by the person in whose possession it was found, the sd. person was required by the court 44 to look-up the Indian; ” and to give him the opportunity, he was bound over to the next term. In 1670, an order was passed in town-meeting regulating the “taking of pine-knots from the commons’ woodland, to make tar” —Michael Blackwell was appointed agent for the Herring-river 1 Mr. Bassett had been " licensed to draw wines,” hut had resigned his license. He probably had the remains of his stock on hand, and the con- stable officiously attempted ‘ modern usage.’ 2 Mr. Dillingham was an old and respected citizen, and one of the origi- nal proprietors. His will, exhibited June 1, 1667, by Stephen Wing and William Griffith, favors the presumption that he originated in Leicester Co., Eng., and probably from Bitteswell. The will is, in substance, “ a deed of gift ” to his two sons, Henry and John, “ in trust, not to be their proper right, but of persons named: only they are to take care of the goods until the owners send for them; viz. 3 mares and 3 foals, 2 year-old horses, 2 milch- cows, 1 four-year old steer, 1 three-year old steer, 1 two-year old heifer, 3 one-year old heifers,” with some other things. The persons mentioned “ in whose proper right these goods are,” as follows : “ £22 to Rt. Low of Bitteswell, son to blind Rt Low; £18 to Thos. Low, commonly called Thos. Low of the Back House ; £6 to Thos. Low, called Thos. Low in the Lane; £1 to Thos. Shatswell; £2.10 to Wm. Binsent; KF* All these are of Bites- well in the Co. of Leicester; £ 4 to Anne Porter of Shawell, same Co.; £2.10 to Rd. Porter, do.; £1 to Nathl. Cox of Litterworth; £1.10 to John Wright of Cottesbith; £4 to Old Cart of Leine ; £3 to Edward Clark, do.; £1 to another man that hath a bond of mine, of Earlephilton ; £2 to Will: Thornton of Neather Elbrook. — I hope these sums may hold out; but if short, to be pd. in proportion. There is much loss in the cattle. Henry owes me £4, and John £5.10, for divers small things I sold them; to be added.” — It is naturally supposed that these persons were former neighbors of Mr. D., and had sent over cattle to receive back the increase after a term of years. — Drusilla, the wife of Mr. D., had d. some 10 yrs. previous, viz.: Feo. 6, 1656. His son Henry, b. in Eng. prob. as early as 1627 ; his son John, b. prob. as early as 1630; and his dr. Oseah, who m. Stephen Wing about 1647, (see judicial record,) and d. Ap. 9,1654, were his only children whose names appear on the records.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 67 fishery. — A prominent man late an inhabitant of this town, but now a resident on the Vineyard, sued for and obtained a divorce — his wife, whom he married in Boston, having gone to Virginia with another man. This and similar episodes we might omit were the mention not necessary to constitute the shades that give prom- inence to the picture of the prevailing morality of society. — Mr. William Bassett d. this year, se. abt. 45. In 1671, it was ordered that “ all masters of families and all young men that are at their own disposing, shall kill or cause to be killed, one dozen of black-birds.” In 1672, Mr. Edm. Freeman Sr., Wm. Swift, Thos. Wing Sr., Thos. Dexter Sr., Mich. Blackwell, and Wm. Newland, were “ requested to go forward settling and confirming the township with the Sachem of Manomet or any other; also to answer the Barnstable men concerning Aquidnet or any other persons that shall lay claim to any part of this township; ” and Edward Perry and Joseph Hoi way were “ requested to use their best endeavors to procure the best evidence, both English and Indian, and to join their efforts with Rd. Bourne’s, advising with him concerning the Indian testimony.” —Edm. Freeman, Thos. Dexter Jr., and Edw. Perry were “ appointed to act for the town in the matter of Scau- ton Neck which is the right of the town, and to answer at the Plym. court to the complaint of Mark and Amos the sons of the Indian chiefs or to any other Indian or Englishman that shall lay claim to sd. Neck or any part of it; Stephen Wing, town clerk, to sign the letter of attorney ” — “For six young wolves,” £2 was ordered “to be pd. to Danl. and Obadiah Butler.” — “Old John, alias Mopes, Indian,”1 was adjudged by court “to pay Wm. Swift his demand.” 1 We suppose this to be the same who is elsewhere called “ Old Hope,” living at Manomet, and whose name occurs, 1675, in the jury which con- demned the “murderer” of John Sassamon. In 1679, his testimony was taken by the court at Plym. “ in reference to the little island called Nano- messet lying near to Saconeesit,” i. e. Falmouth; and also “ in regard to a little neck of land or little island called Uckatincet,” originally a neck “ be- longing to a great island called Katomuck,” now Nashon; and “ another little island lying between the sd. great island and Nanomesset, which he testified “ belonged to Job Antiko, his grandfather Comuck, and to Job’s father Tom Antiko.” And “ the said Mope or Hope further saith that the sd. great island called Katomuck, and another little island called Peskeha- meesit ” (the Rev. Experience Mayhew wrote it Pashchetonesit—the sup- posed Tucker’s Island of history) “belonged to Webacowet.” — “Will: Numack, Indian, also testified that he had often heard his father say the same concerning the islands commonly called Nashanow ”—the name origi- nally of the collective group. Webacowet and Numack were Indians of Saconesset.68 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1675, it was “voted that the fines and forfeitures of those who neglected to go out when drafted for the country’s service, be collected according to the order of the Council of War, Dec. 30;” also that Thos. Tupper, Hy. Dillingham, Stephen Skif£ and Josh- ua Borgis be of the Council of War from this time.”—A meeting was “ called, Feb. 28, by Lt. John Ellis and Benj. Hammond the constable, and liberty was granted to any families that may be necessitated, to repair to the town garrison for safety.” It was also “ordered that those citizens entitled to vote, who do not attend town-meetings, be fined 2 s. 6 d. each for each and eveiy delinquency.” — The town, at a meeting called for the purpose, “ granted liberty to the Indians to set up a house to meet in on Lord’s days for the present summer, provided sd. Indians will not damage the meadows by letting their horses into the same.” “ The town voted, 23d 2d mo., to record the names of all those that can make appear their just right to the privileges of the town; whereupon, in open town-meeting, the following names were ordered to be recorded: Caleb Allen, Frs. Allen, George Allen, Jed. Allen, Ralph Allen, Wm. Allen, John Blackwell, Mich. Blackwell, Neh. Besse, John Bodfish, Job Bourne, Rd. Bourne, Sami. Briggs,1 George Buit,2 3 Jacob Burge, Thos. Butler,5 Rd. Chadwell, Thos. Dexter Sr., . Hy. Dillingham, John Ellis Sr., Ambrose Fish, Nathl. Fish Sr., Edm. Freeman Sr., Edm. Freeman Jr., Peter Gaunt, John Gibbs, Thos. Gibbs Sr., Wm. Gifford, Thos. Greenbill, Rt. Harper,4 Joseph Holway, John Jenkins, Samuel Knott, Thos. Landers,5 1 Mr. Samuel Briggs was a son of John who d. 1641 ae. 26, leaving this son and a daughter. The son had a family in this town, but there are no records of the generations after them. 2 Geo. Buit (sometimes written Bewitt) d. 1675. 3 Mr. Thomas Butler was early in town, but the record of his family is brief. There is none of sons. Obadiah, by Eliz., had a large family, from 1707 to 1733 ; and was perhaps a grandson. The name appears, how- ever, in both Barnstable and Falmouth. 4 In 1689, Mr. Robert Harper was an inhabitant of Falmouth. He had been a very prominent man in all the Quaker troubles, end himself “ a great sufferer.” Besides his trials here of fines in the aggregate of £44, he was sentenced to 15 stripes in Boston in 1659. By m. with Deborah Perry May 9, 1654, and 2d, Prudence Butler June 22, 1666, he had.a large fami- ly ; and his son Stephen had lands in F. 1704. 5 The first of the name here was Thomas Landers 1637. His inven-ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 69 John Newland,1 Wm. Newland,1 Benj. Nye Sr., Edw. Perry, Hy. Sanderson, James Skiff Sr., Stephen Skifi£ Wm. Swift Sr., Thos. Tobey Sr., Thos. Tupper Sr., Thos. Tupper Jr., Isaac Turner, Mich. Turner, Danl. Wing, Joseph Wing, Steph. Wing, Thos. Wing Sr., Joseph Winsor. In 1676, the name of John Smith was added to the list of freemen. From this latter circumstance, it may he inferred that this was the period when the pastorate of the Rev. John Smith commenced; although some circum- stances have led to the supposition that he may have officiated here earlier.2 That Mr. Ichabod Wiswall and Mr. Thomas Dally were both employed here some tory was presented hy Edmund Freeman Jr. and others 1675. There have been many of the name, branches of which are also found in Falmouth and Rochester. 1 Of the Newlands, John and William, though prominent men, we find hut little on the records from which to condense genealogical data. Mr, John Newland was now deceased, as is evident not only from the omis- sion of his name as /Sr., but from the fact that his widow Eliz. d. May 22, 1671. The John here mentioned as townsman was prob. his son. — Wil- liam m. Rose Holloway May 19, 1648. 2 There can be no doubt that after the departure of Mr. Leverich, Mr. Richard Bourne and Mr. Thos. Tupper officiated, without ordination, for some time. The Rev. Gideon Hawley in his biographical reminiscences addressed in 1794 to the Hist. Soc. of Mass., says, “ Mr. Bourne and Mr. Tupper were both of them persons of a religious turn—the latter a little tinged with the fanaticism so prevalent at that time in the country from whence they came. These men, as I learn by tradition, carried on at Sand- wich the religious exercises, officiating publicly on the Lord’s day, each of them having his party, but as the congregation was, all included, small, it did not separate — the people agreeing that the one who had most adher- ents at a meeting should for the time being be minister for the day. In the process of time, the congregation settled Mr. Smith in whom they united. Mr. Smith had for a time officiated in Barnstable, afterwards on Long Island, then in the Jerseys, and finally returned and settled in Sandwich as £astor. Messrs. Bourne and Tupper then turned their attention to the idians.” The inference, without further data, would be that Mr. Smith was the successor, with the above exceptions, of Mr. Leverich. He doubtless was his successor in the pastorate, but after a long interval. Finding in the records evidence of provision being made at different times “ for the sup- port of the minister,” prior to the above date, we naturally inferred as did Mr. Hawley, that Mr. Smith’s ministry commenced earlier than it actually did. But, fortunately, at a late hour, we were put in possession of a letter written by Rev. Benj. Fessenden soon after Ins own settlement in 1722, addressed to Rev. Thos. Prince and designed to aid in his compilation of his intended 2d Vol. of Chronology; and this letter clears up some matters that before were exceedingly indistinct.70 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. considerable time before the settlement of Mr. Smith, there can be no doubt.1 Ralph Allen and Stephen Skiff were appointed this year “ to carry the town’s mind to Barnstable, that the towns may know each other’s minds in reference to the bringing of some of the people of the out-towns, among us.”2—And it was voted that “ forasmuch as it is judged for the safety of the town to keep a watch between Wayquonscott and the sea beyond Lt. John Ellis’ land, [and the same has already been concluded by commissioning officers to be with those chosen by other towns a Council of War; yet judging, notwithstanding, that the object will not be suffi- ciently answered unless men be hired to keep constantly out upon service,] that Lt. John Ellis, Thos. Tobey Sr., and Stephen Skiff 1 Mr. Fessenden's letter to which reference is made in the preceding note, is conclusive on this point. He confirms the tradition afterwards repeated by Mr. Hawley, of the state of things after the departure of Mr. Leverich; saying, “ They are now without a minister, and brethren Bourne and Tup- per officiate alternately.” He then adds, after reference to the religious dissensions that for a long time prevailed and the defection of not a few, “ They never could attain a settlement of the ministry among them till about the year 1675, in which intervening time they had occasional preach- ers; first lchabod Wiswall who removed from hence to Sagadahoc and then went to sea, and after his return settled and died in Duxbury; and then Thos. Dally who removed to Yarmouth to one Mrs. Howes who ad- ministered to him in a consumption, but he died thereof. About the year 1675, John Smith was called and ordained their pastor. About the year 1688, Mr. Smith desired a dismission from his pastoral office on account of some ill treatment he met with. A council was called, and the issue of it was that he continued one year more in the pastoral office, and then desist- ed.” Mr. Fessenden's tradition in regard to Mr. Wiswall is corroborated by the mention in the Colony-court record of one Rt. Harper being arraigned for “ railing against Mr. Wiswall,” at Sandwich. We say corroborated, for Mr. Fessenden's letter pretends not to historical accuracy, and in some of the earlier statistics he is evidently misinformed, as a reference to records show. The letter itself, however, is his best apologist: it opens, “ Rev. Sir, — The Hon. Col. Bourne just now informed me that your New E. Chr. waited for the rem.s of our place, and you wondered I had not sent, &c. If I don't mistake I once told you the reas. why I had not wrote, viz. that what I could write could not pretend to the character of a Chronology wh. is requisite adfidem verce Histories; and on this account had laid aside all tho’t of ever collecting, or sending what I had heard and written for my own private use, from some of the most ancient and intelligent people among us. The first book of^records for the town is partly lost, and the remains are very broken and scarcely legible; and the other books have little or nothing in them to the present purpose: so that the greatest strength of most of these collections lies in uncertain and doubtful tradi- tion.” 2 A general meeting of the citizens of the Cape was held at B., for the purpose of inviting the exposed and suffering from Indian depredations to repair hither for succor.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 71 be empowered as agents to hire for the town as many men as shall be necessary to accomplish the end proposed.”1 The town gave “ Benj. Nye leave to build a fulling-mill on a river commonly called Spring-Hill River.” — Thos. Dexter and Wm. Swift were chosen “to goto Yarmouth to And.'Hallett’s, to meet men from Barnstable and from other towns for settling the bounds of Scauton.” — An order was passed “ to prevent the destruction of young trees by peeling the bark from the same.” — “A misun- derstanding existing” among some of the towns as to some public charges, and the council of war having determined that Sandwich pay the town of Barnstable £73.16 “to balance the account of charges that have arisen by the late wars,” the town agreed “ to pay the same out of the great rate of £ 279.1.” Mr. Thomas Tupper Sr., who has all along been conspic- uous in Town’s affairs and as a religious teacher greatly interested in the welfare of the Indians, died this year at a great age. His descendants are numerous.2 In 1677, June 30, “the raters” were “ordered to make rates concerning the war that is past;” and Rd. Bourne, Thos. Tupper, and Stephen Skiff, were app. “to take account of what ought justly to be satisfied for in reference to the war that hath already been; as also to take account of all the town’s debts that appear justly due by reason of what has fallen out in the war.” — A fla- grant case is this year reported — that of a person having “ car- nally known ” a young woman “ against her will.” The parties were of the same family name and nearly related. The penalty of death was not enforced because of some circumstances leading to doubts in regard to the accumulating part of the crime alleged. The sentence was a fine and public whipping. 1 The importance of this precautionary act can hardly be overestimated. 8 He d. Mar. 28, ©. upwards of 98 yrs. His wife d. this same yr. ae. 90. He was one of the original grantees. He was Selectman many yrs., Deputy 19 yrs., and filled various offices, besides giving much of his time “ to the work of gospelizing the Indians.” From the ‘Patronymica Britannia, by Lower, Lond. 1840/ we extract the following: — “ Tupper appears in its original form as Toppfer— a name well known in the literature of Germany and France. The family, widely scattered in the religious troubles of the xvi. century,* having * lost all ’ under Charles V. as obstinate Lutherans, were called Toutperd in France, and, by corruption, Toupard in the Netherlands; whilst in Germany and England and among the Puritan fathers of Ameri- ca, the name assumed the form so familiar to the public as the designation of the author of Proverbial Philosophy. The principal branch went to Guernsey in 1548.” — Another branch located in Sandwich, Eng.72 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Mr. John Ellis, the ancestor of those of the name in this town, one of the oldest and first settlers, died this year.1 The following were added this year to the list of townsmen: Geo. Barlow,2 3 Mordecai Ellis, Ezra Perry Sr., Elisha Bourne, Benj. Hammond,8 Ezra Perry Jr. Daniel Butler, Lodowick Hoxie, In 1678, the following appears among the court orders: “This may certify that certain Indians near Sandwich, whose names are Canootus, Symon, and Joel, being apprehended on their confes- sion, and convicted of feloniously breaking open a house and steal- ing from a chest of Zechariah Allen of Sandwich, £25 in money^ and they having lost or embezzled sd. money and no other way appearing how he may be satisfied for his loss, the colony have sentenced the above-named Indians to be perpetual slaves, and empower the sd. Allen to make sale of them in N. England, or elsewhere, as his lawful slaves, for the term of their lives.”4 * * * Thos. Gibbs Jr., and John Gifford, were added to the list of townsmen. — And, at a meeting, July 15, “ a list was made of the names of all who have taken the oath of fidelity: viz. Frs. Allen, Geo. Allen, Geo. Barlow, John Blackwell, Mich. Blackwell, Jacob Burge, Joseph Burge, Thos. Butler, Thos. Dexter, Hy. Dillingham, Nathl. Fish, Edm. Freeman Jr.* 1 He is called Jr., we know not for what reason. He must, we think, have been Sr. of Sandwich. There probably was one of the name older in the colony. Mr. Ellis m. Elizabeth, dr. of the first Edm. Freeman, and his est. was ad. by the wid. Elizabeth and son Mordecai. 2 That this name was not placed earlier on the list of townsmen, shows the estimation in which the individual had been held. We have referred, Yol. I. 229, and in the present pp, to the creation of a marshal for the espe- cial benefit of Sandwich, Barnstable and Yarmouth in 1658; the marshal then and for such purposes begotten hy extra legislative act, doubtless had previously an existence somewhere as Geo. Barlow: but where the Gen. Court contrived to pick him up to execute its mandates, we are unable to say, and care little to know beyond the fact that he was not a native product of Cape Cod. 3 Benj. Hammond, s. of Wm. and Eliza., from London, was of Yarm. 1643, and came to this town about 1650. His 2d s. John was b. in S. Nov. 22, 1653. He had, by his wife Mary, Hose, who d. 1676, and others. He removed from this town to Rochester. 4 “A sister of John Sassamon was this year claimed as a slave by Joseph Burge; the title being proved, it was ordered by the court that £5 be pd. for her liberty.” “ Many women and children were thus held, throughout the colony —victims of the late war.” — Baylies.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 73 John Gibbs, • Thos. Gibbs Sr., Benj. Hammond, Joseph Holway, Lodo. Hoxie, Benj. Nye, Ezra Perry Jr., Hy. Sanderson, Rd. Smith, Thos. Tobey, Thos. Tupper, Steph. Wing, Joseph Winsor. Wm. Swift Jr., At the same meeting, “ Peter Gaunt, John Jenkins, and Wm. Newland, in the name and behalf of the rest of their fellow- townsmen that are of their religion, do declare their dissent against the town’s disposing of any privileges that belong to them as townsmen.” In 1679, Sheaij. Bourne and John Chipman were ad. as towns- men. — It was voted “ that Shubael Smith be pd. £1 for a wolf killed by his bro. Benj.”—Also “that £1.15 be paid to Indian Connelow for 7 young wolves.” — And “ that the School-master shall, for his encouragement, have his rate abated.” In 1680, May 18, Thos. Dexter, Stephen SkiflJ and Thos. Tup- per, were app. agents, “ to buy of the Indians all the undisposed lands that lie between Plym., Barnstable, and Suckanessett bounds — all that they can purchase of the rightful proprietors.” — Thos. Dexter was licensed “ to keep an ordinary for the entertainment of strangers.” — A meeting was held, Aug. 30, “to arrange for the support of a minister; and a rate of £50 was ordered.” — It was “ordered that the £28 in silver brought to the town, be divided among the persons that paid the war-rate.”—And, “at a town- meeting for the choice of military officers, it was agreed to allow £12 in pay as it ordinarily passes, to Mr. James Chadwick upon consideration that he keep a school in Sandwich one year.” In 1681, a committee was app. “ to make sale of the whales that are lately cast ashore in the harbor; and it was agreed that Jo- seph Holway and those with him in cutting-up the whales, shall have that part they have already cut and secured, on paying £ 6 silver money to the town.” — The following “ were ad. townsmen to vote for officers,” &c.: John Barlow,1 Josh. Blackwell, John Dillingham, Wm. Bassett, John Dexter, Freeman Ellis, 1 Whether Geo. Barlow had been matrimonially connected before his m. with Jane, the widow of Mr. Anthony Besse, does not clearly appear; but he probably had been. John Barlow, prob. s. of Geo., had, by his w. Elizabeth who d. May 10,1729, Sarah Oct. 15,1693; Keturah May 29,1698; Samuel Feb. 14, 1700-1; John Oct. 30, 1706; Nathan Oct 30, 1710; and William Ap. 14,1713. There have been many families of the name in town. Some were early at Rochester and Duxbury, as also at Newport, R. L vol. n. 1074 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Manoah Ellis, Caleb Nye, Eph. Swift, Matthias Ellis, Eben. Nye, Wm. Swift Jr, John Fish, Jona. Nye, Eph. Tobey, Edm. Freeman Jr., Nathan Nye, John Tobey, Israel Gaunt, John Perry, Nathan Tobey, Sami. Gibbs, Benj. Smith Sr., John Wing, Sam. Hammond, John Smith Jr., Nathl. Wing, Rich. Handy, Shubael Smith, Sami. Wing. And the foUowing took the oath of fidelity: Benj. Barlow, Mord. Ellis, Ezra Perry Jr., John Barlow, Ambrose Fish, John Perry, Moses Barlow, John Fish, Benj. Smith, s. of Rd. Steph. Barlow, Edm. FreemanJTr., John Smith, Wm. Bassett, Sami. Gibbs, Shubael Smith, Neh. Bessie,1 Thos. Gibbs Jr., Eph. Swift, Josh. Blackwell, John Gifford, Sami. Swift, Elisha Bourne, Sami. Hammond, Wm. Swift Jr., Sami. Briggs, Rd. Handy, Eph. Tobey, John Dillingham, Caleb Nye, John Tobey, Freeman Ellis, Eben. Nye, Wm. Tobey, Manoah Ellis, Jona. Nye, Thos. Tupper Jr., Matthias Ellis, Nathan Nye, Sami. Wing. Richard Chad well, an original grantee, died this year, Nov. 27; and thus the family name of a prom- inent citizen disappears from the town records.2 In 1682, Jan. 16, Mr. Edm. Freeman Sr. and Ezra Perry Sr. were app. a com. “ to see that the minister is paid according to the 1 Mr. Anthony Besse came over 1635 se. 26. It is said “ he preached to the Indians.” He was among the first who came to this town from Lynn. His will bears date Feb. 10, 1656-7, in which he mentions wife Jane, and children Nehemiah, David, Anne, Mary, and Elizabeth. His inv. rendered 1657. We know not the date of the births of these, except that David was b. May 23, 1649. We know too that Anthony was of age in 1664. It is said that Anne m. Andrew Hallett; and Elizabeth, we know, m. Joseph Bodfish 1674. The widow Jane m. 2d the notorious George Barlow. Her will bears date Aug. 6, 1693, in which she mentions drs. Anne Hallett, Eliza. Bodfish, and Rebecca Hunter, and sons Neh. Besse and John Bar- low. Nehemiah, by his wife Mary, had Mary Nov. 1680 who m. Benj. Curtis of Plym. Dec. 3,1700; Nehemiah July 3,1682 ; Hannah 1684-5 who m. Thos. Jones Oct. 5,1708 ; Robert Ap. 31, 1690 who m. Ruth Pray of Bridgewater May 9, 1712; Joshua Feb. 14,1692-3; David Dec. 23, 1693, who m. Mary Pray July 18, 1717 ; Benj. Sept. 20,1696; and Ebenezer Ap. 30, 1699. — The Besses were truly unfortunate in their connection with Barlow as appears from sundry court records. 2 He m. Katharine Pressbury, July 22,1649, but left no issue.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 75 order of court in such case provided.” — It was voted, May 17, that “ forasmuch as the inhabitants of Barnstable have manifested their desire to have the bound-marks sufficiently set up between the towns of B. and S., and that this town would make choice of some meet persons to join with themselves to exact and set up the boundaries aforesaid that peace and unity may still be contin- ued, Edw. Perry and Joseph Holway be delegated to that duty.” — “ Agreed that all town debts may be paid in rye at 3 s. 6 d. pr. bu., barley at 3 s., and Indian corn at 3 s.”— “Ordered, Dec. 8, that whales that come ashore, and other great fish that yield any quantity of oil, be given to Thomas Tupper, Geo. Allen, Caleb Allen, and Sami. Briggs, for ten years, for one half the oil deliv- ered at the dock in good casks — they to pay a barrel of oil out of every whale, to the country according to the order of court.” — Samuel Prince, John Allen Sr., Thos. Tupper Jr., and Thos. Smith were this year ad. townsmen. The decease of Mr. Edmund Freeman^ Sr., the origi- nal proprietor of the township, occurred this year.1 Of the decease and burial of his wife, see Vol. I. 616-18, and of branches of the family, Yol. 1.601 and 618. All that is certain of the immediate issue of this our progenitor, is, that the following children came over with him in 1635 in the ship Abigail, Rd. Hackwell master, which commenced loading in May, and soon after sailed from London, viz.: Alice b. in Eng. abt. 1618, who m. Dea. Wm. Paddy of Plvm. Nov. 24, 1639, ancf37Ap. 24, 1651, [whose issue were Elizabeth Nov. 12, 1641, John Nov. 25, 1643, Sami. Aug. 1, 1645, Mercy 1646, Thomas Sept. 6, 1647, and Joseph Sept. 10, 1649;] Edmund b. abt. 1620; Elizabeth b. abt. 1625; and John b. abt. 1628; but some have it that there was another dr. who m. Edward Perry, inasmuch as Mr. F.’s will June 21, 1682, pr. Nov. 2. 1682, mentions “ sons Edm. and John, dr. Eliza- beth Ellis, and son-in-law Edward Perry,” to whom with his g. s. Thos. Paddy he gives his property. We will not enter here upon a discussion of this last conjecture. It has been generally conceded that “ Mrs. Elizabeth Freeman ” who d. Feb. 24, 1675-6, was the wife of the Sr. Edmund Free- man; but even of this some doubt has been expressed. — Edmund, s. of the above, m. Rebecca, dr. of Gov. Thos. Prence Ap. 22, ld?6, anc£ some have it, had Rebecca— the mother dying "soon after, and the dr. m. Ezra Perry. It may be so; this much is certain, Mr. F. m. 2d Margaret Perry July 13, 1651 — not Young as some report it, for the record lsplmn — ana had Margaret Oct 2, 1652; Edjnund Oct. 5, 1655 ; Ahce Mar. 29, 1658; prob. Rachel Sept. 4, 1659; Saijih Feb. 6, 1662; and Deborah Aug. 9, 1665. We say probably, for the Junior is omitted in the record of the last three births. —Edmund, of the last family, by his wife Sarahs had Edmund ~ Aug. 30, 1683; HBenjT Jan. 6, 1685-6; Mary Mar. 13, 1687-8, who m. Tim. Nye Aug. 7,1716, and d. June 1734 ;Tohn June 12, 1693; Thomas Mar. 26, 1696 ; Joseph July 18,1698, who m.'Tabitha Tobey May 9, 1726-7 and d. 1790 in Cuxbury, leaving there a large family; William,Dec. 4, 1700; Sarah Dec. 6, 1703, who m. Isaac Nye Feb. 7, 1725-6 and d. 1786; and Isaacl5ct. 20, 1706. All these were b. m Sandwich; but the father, just before his decease, removed to that part of Yarm. called Nobscusset, having ^ \76 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1683, it was “ordered that Stephen Skiff and John Blackwell join our loving neighbors of Plym. to set the bounds between Plym. and Sandwich; and that Sheaijashub Bourne and Thos. Tupper join with Suckanessett men to erect bounds between them and Sandwich, according to the order of this Court.” Also, that “ whereas wolves are very destructive in devouring our crea- tures, the Indians be paid for killing, a bounty of 15 s. for old exchanged property with the Halls of that place; and hence his will, May 13, 1720, pr. May 23, mentions him “ of Yarmouth.” It mentions also his “ wife Sarah, two drs. and 7 sons,” and gives to the eldest son “ a double portion” of his estate — a part of which was “lands in the Ct. Colony.” It has been supposed, not without some reason, that his wife was a dr. of Mr. John Sunderland. [Mr. S., in his will, Sept. 7, 1700, pr. Ap. 4, 1704, names “ my wife Tamzin, drs. Gourdon Severance, Mary Bangs, Sarah Freeman, ana Mary Sears,” as legatees. “ Mr. S., late of Eastham ” 1704, had been taxed in Yarm. 1676, then a “ school-master,” and seems to have removed after.] As Mr. F. failed to name in his will an executor, an agreement was signed by the heirs June 15, 1720, sustaining the provisions of the will and proposing the widow as administratrix—signed by “ Sarah widow, Edmd., Benj., John, Thos., Joseph, Wm., Isaac, Timo. Nye and Mary his wife, Sarah Freeman,” and by “ Ebr. Wing guardian to the three younger children” Wm., Sarah and Isaac.—Edmund, eldest son of the last family, lived in Sandwich, and m. Keziah Presbury. They had Edmund Mar. 14, 1708-9 who d. May 27; Lydia Ap. 8, 1710 who m. Benj. Nye and d. 1730; Edmund Sept. 30, 1711 O. S., who grad. H. C. 1733; Prince May 13, 1713; Stephen Aug. 14, 1714; Sylvanus Sept. 7,1716; Nathaniel Mar. 31, 1718; Keziah July 7, 1719 who m. Snow of Ashford, Ct., and 2d Shaw of Pomfret, and d. 1789; Sarah Jan. 18, 1720 who m. Malachi Conant of Mansfield, Ct. and d. 1791; Deborah Ap. 17, 1722 who m. Zech. Paddock, removed to Albany, N. Y., and d. 1803; Skiffe Dec. 28, 1723; Thomas Aug. 17, 1725 who d. May 21, 1726; Abigail Feb. 20, 1726-7 who m. Wm. Johnson of Mansfield, and d. 1782; and Margaret Aug. 21, 1729 who d. Sept. 10. All this large family of 14 ch. were b. in S., except possibly the last, and all ultimately removed to Mansfield, Ct., as did the parents to possess the inheritance of “ lands in the Ct. Colony.” Mr. F. d. June 1, 1766; his wife d. Ap. 20, 1764. — Edmund, 2d s. of the last family, b. 1711, resided in S. and m. Martha Otis Aug. 7, 1736; he then removed to Nobscusset and engaged temporarily in school-teaching; and finally removed to Ct. and died Feb. 11,1800. His issue was Edmund Ap. 29, 1737, whose family was the first settled in Hanover, N. H., where his wife, the first winter, was the only female in the township. He was after- wards known as Col. F. of Lebanon; Nathl. Mar. 11, 1738 who d. July 21, 1740; Nathaniel (the bond, father of the writer of this history) Mar. 28, 1741 O. S.,the preceding b. all in Yarm.; Abigail May 20, 1743 who m. Aaron Hovey of Mansfield; Jonathan Mar. 21, 1745 who m. Sarah Huntington of Norwich, and was Mem. Cong, from N. H.; Otis May 13, 1748, known in Hanover as Col. F., a thrifty farmer; Russell July 17, 1750 who resided in Haverhil, was Speaker of the H. Rep. of N. H. 1797, and also of the Council, and was murdered Dec. 18, 1805 by the infamous Burnham ; Moody Ap. 25, 1753 who d. in W. N. York, a fanner, July 16 1828; Frederic Oct. 8,1755 who d. in Mansfield, June 19,1818, a prominent man; and Martha Mar. 15, 1759 who m. Roger Hovey July 6, 1783, and resided in Thetford, Vt. — Other branches of the descendants of Mr. Edmund Freeman b. 1655, we shall take up in other parts of this volume.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 77 •wolves, and 5 s. for pups.”—Land was this year given to Mr. Sam- uel Prince.1 In 1684, a road from Barnstable to Plym., through Sandwich, was laid out by a juiy empanelled by the governor. — The town “ordered that inhabitants who are 70 yrs. of age shall be excused from killing the quota of blackbirds.” In 1685, Sandwich became a town of * the county of Barnstable’—the Plymouth Colony being divided into three counties. The General Court provided “that the former titles of lands be confirmed,” which confirma- tion under the seal of the Colony was made necessary in consequence of the proceedings of Randolph.2 — Mr. Thomas Burge died this year, Feb. 13. 1 “ A house-lot on the commons near the mill.” The house he erected and in which his distinguished sons were bom, is still standing. It is much to be regretted that we shall not be able to present a full biography of this eminent citizen of Sandwich known to be highly influential and respected, and whose distinguished son did so much to perpetuate a record of impor- tant events, and to whom we are so greatly indebted# for many invaluable labors. See Yol. L 366. 2 «be it known to all men by these presents, That whereas at his Majesty’s Gen. Ct. held at Plymouth, the 4th of June last, it was ordered and enacted that his Majesty’s Ct. of Assts. be from time to time a Com. empowered to examine, allow and confirm all such claims and titles to lands which were formerly gr. or allowed by the Gen. Ct. either unto townships or to particular persons, which being allowed by the sd. Com. shall pass the seal of the Govt, for further confirmation thereof: And forasmuch as it hath been made to appear unto the sd. Court of Assts. now sitting at Plym., the 7th day of July 1685, that a certain tract of lands was by Mr. Wm. Brad- ford and his associates assembled in court the 3d day of Apl. 1637, granted unto Mr. Edmund Freeman, Hy. Feak, Thos. Dexter, with others of their associates to erect a plantation or town in this government, and to receive in more inhabitants to them according to order, and duly to dispose of sd. lands to such as were or should be orderly admitted to them in sd. township which was afterwards called Sandwich, and all such privileges allowed to them as per the Ct. is allowed and gr. to other townships; and the bounds of sd. town laid out by Capt. Myles Standish and Mr. John Alden app. thereunto by the Ct, which bounds are as followeth, viz. — ‘Westerly by the dividing line between the town of Plym. and the sd. town of Sandwich; and on the East by the line which divides between sd. town of Sandwich and the town of Barnstable, which runs Northeast to the sea and Southwest into the woods, and is bounded Northerly by the sea and Southerly partly by the dividing line between them and Suckanesset, and partly by the Indians* lands, according to the known and accustomed boundaries; — This Court doth therefore declare, ratify and confirm all the aforesaid lands, both up- land, swamps, meadow, marsh, and flax-lands, with all waters, rivers, creeks, coves and harbors contained within sd. bounds and limits, with all and sin- gular the mines, fishing-profits, privileges and appurtenances, to all and78 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1686, the town was ordered by the Gen. Ct. to select a jury- list, and to send jurors to the court. — The Colony laws being printed, and ordered to be published in the several towns, “ Thos. Tupper andLudowick Hoxie were appointed by the town to divide the law-books among the citizens according to the last year’s coun- try’s rate.”—Mr. Thos. Dexter Sr. died this year, Dec. 29.1 every the sd. granted premises belonging or any wise appertaining, to be and remain to the sd. town of Sandwich and to the several proprietors thereof according to their and each and every one of their common or par- ticular interest, right, title, and proprietry unto the sd. lands or other the premises, or unto any part or parcel thereof by grant or allowance of sd. town, or by any other lawful ways and means whatsoever had and enjoyed or to be nad and enjoyed, and their and each and every one of their suc- cessors, heirs, and assigns forever: To have and to hold to the sd. town of Sandwich and to the several proprietors whatsoever respectively and to their and each and every one of their successors, heirs and assigns forever, and to their and every one of their only proper use and behoof respectively forever, according to the tenure of our Charter or Letters Patents to be holden of his Majesty as of his manor of East Greenwich in the County of Kent in free and common soccage and not in capite nor by Knight’s service yielding and paying to our sovereign lord the King, his heirs and successors forever one fifth part of the ore of the mines of gold and silver, and other fifth part thereof to the President and Council in sd. Letters Patent men- tioned, which shall be had and obtained within the precincts and limits of the bounds aforesaid, for all service and demands whatsoever: — In testi- mony whereof this Court doth allow the common Seal of this Govt, to be here- unto affixed for the further confirmation thereof. Now, therefore, further know ye: That I, Thomas Hinckley, Gov. of this Colony of New Plym., for our Sovereign lord the King, for this present year, 1685, by virtue of the trust and trusts committed to me, as well as by a former Act and Order made by sd. Wm. Bradford and his associates assembled in Court A. D. 1636, as by the above mentioned act for the more full assurance and absolute confirma- tion of all the sd. lands and other the premises (in this Deed contained) unto the sd. town of Sandwich, and to the several proprietors thereof, their and every of their heirs, successors and assigns forever in manner and form aforesd. according to the true intent and meaning of these Presents, yield- ing and paying as aforesaid, have hereunto affixed the Common Seal of this Government, this 13th day of July, 1685, and in the year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord the King, James the Second by the grace of God, of England, &c. This Deed is recorded in the Thomas Hinckley, Gov. Book of Evidences of Lands enrolled 1681, & p. 394. Pr.- Nathaniel Clarke, Sec’y. 1 Mr. Dexter was, it is supposed, the son of the original proprietor of the same name, whose ultimate residence here seemed for a time to be in suspense. The son was a respected and useful citizen. Of the father, who finally fixed his residence here, we can give at best only an ambiguous ac- count : Mr. Thomas Dexter, the first, was early at Lynn, and when ad. May 18, 1631, wras the owner of 800 acres of land. It appears from Lewis and others, that in 1630 he bought of 4 Duke William,’ alias 4 Black Will,’ whose father had been a sachem at Swampscott and d. before the English arrived, the whole of Nahant — paying therefor a suit of clothes. ThisANNALS OF SANDWICH. 79 In 1687, July 12, Edward Perry was chosen “ commissioner; ” John Allen Sr. app. “ sealer of measures, weights, and yards; ” Thos. Tupper “was chosen captain,” John Gibbs “lieut.,”Wm. Bassett “ ensign,” and Shubael Smith “ military clerk.” Black Will was hung in 1633 by the white people in revenge for a murder committed, as was supposed, by Indians. Will was not the offender, but his prominence caused him to be selected as the victim for the retaliatory act! Gov. Winthrop says that 44 Bagnell ” — the white man murdered, “ was a wicked fellow and had much wronged the Indians.” Mr. D. lived at that time on the banks of the Saugus River, was an active and enterprising man, and land-speculator. He built a mill and weir across the river, and was known as 4 farmer Dexter/ He also built a fence across * the reach’ at Nahant 4 to keep out wolves and swine/ His relations with the people seem not to have been quite peaceful; and he is reported as having quarrelled even with Mr. Endicott who so far forgot his own dignity as to strike Dexter. In 1633, Mar. 4, Dexter was ordered to be 44 set in the bilbowes,” also fined £10 and disfranchised, 44 for speaking reproachful and seditious words against the Government here established.” Nor did his troubles end thus; for, besides other difficulties, he was presented in 1640 44 for common sleep- ing in meetings for public worship,” and was fined. Vexatious and expen- sive lawsuits to which he was a party, are mentioned. Lewis says he removed to Sandwich, 1637. This may be correct; but the established resi- dence of Mr. D. does not appear by the records to have been so early. Indeed his turn for speculation and his enterprising spirit seem to have made him somewhat a cosmopolite. His assignment of lands in S. in 1641, was conditional. In 1643, he was one of those liable to bear arms in S. An interval, 1648 and subsequent, seems to have marked his domicil in Barnstable, and then again he is of Sandwich. Mr. Savage, we sup. on good authority, reports him as having d. in Boston 1677. He had, doubtless, sons Thomas and William, and a dr. Mary is recorded as b. in Barnstable, Aug. 11, 1649. The sons, Thomas at least, must have been b. in England. — Mr. Thomas Dexter Jr., whose d. is mentioned above as occurring Dec. 29, 1686, had by w. Elizabeth who d. Mar. 19, 1714, Eliza- beth, Mary, John, and Abigail. The first named b. Sept. 21, 1651, is said to have been a maiden in 1717; the second, Mary, is reported as having m. Daniel Allen of Swansey; and the last, Abigail, b. June 12,1663, as having m. Jonathan Hallett Jan. 30, 1684. — John, the only son of Thos. Jr. of whom we have knowledge, m. Mehitable Hallett, sup. to be dr. of Andrew, Nov. 10, 1682, having been ad. when prob. just of age a townsman in S. 1681, where he had Elizabeth Nov. 2, 1683 $ Thomas Aug. 26,1686, who is afterwards called Jr. whilst his uncle Thos. is called Sr.; Abigail May 26, 1689; and John Sept. 11, 1692. — William, the 2d son of Thomas 1st, named above, m. Sarah Vincent July, 1653, and had Mary 1654; Stephen j 1657; Philip 1659; James 1662; Thomas 1665; John 1668, and Beni. 1670. He is said to have removed to Barnstable in 1670, and to have a. in Rochester 1694. — Stephen, s. of Will, who went to Be., m. Ann Saunders Ap. 27, 1696, and had Mary Aug. 24, 1696; a son Dec. 23, 1698, who d. soon; Abigail May 13, 1699; Content Feb. 5, 1701; Ann Mar. 3, 1703; Sarah June 1, 1705; Stephen July 26, 1707 ; Mercy July 5, 1709 ; Miriam, Mar. 8, 1712; and Cornelius Mar. 21, 1714. James, sup. to be s. of Will., in his will June 18, 1697, mentions his w. Elizabeth and dr. Elizabeth, and 44 dr. if the last be a dr., or if son,” &c., and names 44 Capt. Seth Tope, Thos. Dexter, and Benj. Dexter, my dear brethren, guardians ” to his children. — The name disappears from S., but became common in Rochester, and in R. Island.80 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1688, the pastoral office of the Rev. John Smith, terminated at his own request. As the church records previous to the ordination of his successor are lost, it has been impossible to give, hitherto, full and authentic statistics of ecclesiastical proceedings. Mr. Smith had already continued to hold office one year since he first urged a request to be released; being pressed thereto by the advice of an ecclesiastical council. The church had not yet recovered from the sad state into which it had been thrown by the religious dissensions of the last thirty years. The active male members of the church, it is said, now numbered but five, besides Mr. Smith, viz. James Skiff, Thomas Tupper, Thomas Tobey, Jacob Burge, and William Bassett. Mr. Smith was already a man ‘ well stricken in years/ having consider- ably passed the ‘age allotted to man/1 and during his entire pastorate had painful experience of the difficul- ties that are the unavoidable inheritance of the min- ister whose lot is cast in the midst of party strife. 1 He was now 74 years of age; and yet he survived many, we trust, hap- pier and less perplexing. That part of the obituary record that mentions his decease, is so worn and mutilated that, for many yrs. the last figures of dates occurring near the margin of the pages are entirely illegible. “ Mr. John Smith died Oct. 2, 17—,” is all that is recoverable. We think there is good reason, from the surroundings, to add a unit to the date which looks like 171—. He evidently died at a great age, and had probably been long disabled by the weight of years. — Our attention has been called by J. Wingate Thornton Esq., of Boston — one of the most keen-sighted and accurate historical observers of the day —to a deposition taken for probate, which may be supposed to settle the question in respect to the origin and date of birth of this venerable Sandwich minister. It appears from this document, that the father of Rev. Mr. S. was Thomas Smith of Brins- pittae, about 5 m. from Dorchester in Dorsetshire. The deposition is that of the son himself, “ John, now, Feb. 8, 1651, in Barnstable, New Plym* outh Colony. The sd. John, only son and heir, supposeth his age about 37, it being, next May, 21 yrs. since he came out from England.” He, i. e. the sd. John, “had sisters in England, viz. Hannah and Tumson.” He must, then, have come over in 1630, at the age of 16, having been b. in 1614. He was in Barnstable early, for he was betrothed to Susanna Hinckley in 1642, and married in 1643. He joined the Barnstable church Oct. 13, 1644, and is first mentioned in the S. records in 1676. — His children were : Samuel, b. Ap. 1644; Sarah, May 1645 ; Eben Oct. 1646; Mary, Nov. 1647; Dorcas, Aug. 1650; John, buried 1651; Shubael, Nov. 1653; John, Sept. 1656; Benj., Jan. 7, 1658; Ichabod, Jan. 7, 1660 j Elizabeth, Feb. 1662; Thomas, Feb. 1664; and Joseph, Dec. 6, 1667.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 81 Early this year, “ an invitation was given to Mr. Pierpont of Roxbury to preach,” whose ministrations were highly acceptable, and whom the people would gladly have received as their pastor j1 but, after offici- ating here some time, he felt constrained to accept a call in another direction.2 In 1689, Stephen Skiff was authorized to solemnize marriages in Sandwich. In 1690, Sept. 19, lands were set apart for the use of the minis- try in Sandwich — “ for such as shall he here called and settled by a major part of the inhabitants.” In 1691, March 11, an invitation to Mr. Roland Cot- ton was extended to continue his labors temporarily, and subsequently he was elected to the pastoral office.3 It was voted, Oct. 3, that certain lands “ be given to Rev. Roland Cotton — to be held by him, his heirs and assigns forever if he remain among us until God take him away by death or otherwise: provided, however, if he 1 Mr. Fessenden’s notes say, “ He left an excellent character among us, and the aged that remember his ministry mention it with great affection and applause.” 2 The ‘ Diary ’ of Mr. Pierpont who was b. in Roxbury 1665, grad. H. C. 1685, and set. at Reading 1689, says : “ Ap. 26,1688,1 had a call to preach at Sandwich, and on the 29th went there accompanied by Elder Chipman. May 5, a public Fast, appointed by reason of sore drought: when the after- noon exercise began, God sent a plenteous rain. May 9, returned fm. S. to my father’s. Aug. 8, went to S. according to promise and continued there a month. The people were very desirous oi my settlement among them; but I kept myself free from any engagement, as my friends coun- selled me. Sept. 5, returned to my father’s house. . . . Received a call to Reading; was in a great strait and knew not which way to move. I had inclined to go to Sandwich, first because I saw there was an opportunity to do service for Christ in that place; second, the generality of the people, except Quakers, were desirous of my coming among them; third, the young men in the place were in danger of being drawn away by the Quakers if a minister was not speedily settled among them. Some counselled me to go to Sandwich — others to Reading. My honored father was averse to my going to S.” — The elements of strife were probably not yet quiet. Mr. Fessen- den relates proof of a proselyting spirit during the ministry of Mr. Smith; citing the name of one, “ a member of the church, proselyted to the Qua- kers by one John Stubbs.” 3 It does not appear that Mr. Cotton was regularly indycted to the pas- torate for some time. Mr. Fessenden intimates that there were some obstacles in the way, but does not define. He says Mr. Cotton was received to be leader in church affairs — to VOL. II. 1182 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. die without issue, or if he remove to better himself, the said lands shall revert to the town.” Mr. Cotton’s name was entered as townsman Oct. 8. The following other persons were admitted townsmen: viz. In 1692, liberty of conscience being assured by the Charter, church-membership was no longer a requisite for civil distinction.—Several important additions were made to the church this year;4 and, Aug. 30, the church renewed their election of Mr. Cotton. In 1693, it was voted by the town, to give to Rev. Mr. Cotton tt to improve so long as he continues here in the ministry, the small neck lying between the two runs of water.”—It was voted “ to engage, and pay from the treasury for, a man to take care of the town’s sheep, and to erect two cottages near the sheep-pasture, for the shepherds.” — The town was this year in controversy with the sheriff of the county, “ he having seized in right of the Crown two whales on shore at Town-Neck.”5 * * 1 We are unable to give any satisfactory account of the Gaunt family; they were numbered among the Quakers, and finally the name disappears from the records. 2 Mr. Jenkins had a large family in this town, but what relation he bore to others of the name who preceded him we are unable to say. These also were found among the Friends, and their representatives may doubtless be found in other towns. 3 Mr. Oliver Norris had by his w. Margery, Benj. Mar. 11,1695-6; Samuel Mar. 20, 1698-9; John July 2, 1710. The records do not show consecutive generations of the name. Their record is prob. to be found chiefly in Plym. 4 “ They received to their number Mr. Samuel Prince, May 1, by letter of dismission from the church at Hull, and Mr. Elisha Bourne at the same time. Mr. Shearj. Bourne was propounded Sept. 4, and ad. Sept. 18. The male members were now 10 in number, and the female 12.” 5 The settlers, in early times of the Colony, regarded it an object of great importance to encourage the raising of sneep. In 1633 it was enacted that “ no sheep shall be sold out of the Colony ” under a penalty involving the forfeiture of their value. At the above date, and long after, large tracts were devoted as “ sheep-pastures ” and shepherds were appointed. The above order was taken m regard to “ the sheep to be kept on the plains.” John Allen Jr., Nathan Barlow, John Chipman Jr., Edw. Dillingham, Mord. Ellis, Israel Gaunt,1 Chris. Gifford, Sami. Gifford, Joseph Hoxie, Zeth. Jenkins,2 3 Rd. Landers, Oliver Norris,8 Israel Tupper, Danl. Wing Jr., Benoni Young. Sami. Perry Jr., Jona. Tobey,ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 83 In 1694, Nov. 28, the Rev. Mr. Cotton was ordained.1 In 1695, Richd. Allen and Timo. Bourne were ad. townsmen. — “ The town did give to those of their neighbors called Quakers, half an acre of ground for a burial-place, on the hill above the Canoe Swamp between the ways.” — “ Liberty was gr. to Elisha Bourne to set up a grist-mill upon Herring River, provided the toll shall not exceed 2 qts. pr. bu.” — “ Voted to give back to Mr. Elisha Bourne and to John Gifford, one half the money they lately paid for not going out when impressed in his Majesty’s ser- vice.” — “ Ordered that no Indians shall settle upon any part of the town’s commons within two miles of the country-road.”—Cer- tain Indians were paid £1.10 “for the heads of three wolves.” — “ Ordered that 4 d. per M. be paid the town’s agent for catching the town’s herrings.” — And, “for the schoolmaster,” £10 was appropriated “ the present year.” In 1696, it was “ ordered, taking into serious consideration the great necessity of making provision for the comfortable support of the Rev. Roland Cotton now pastor of the church and dispenser of the word of God here, no suitable provision being yet made in that respect; that £80 be assessed to be pd. to him Nov. 1, annu- ally : provided, however, that he shall make void the agreement of individuals with himself for his maintenance, and that he shall remit yearly the proportion of all those neighbors generally called Quakers.” In 1697, it was “ ordered that the Indians’ land at Weekepoh be divided from the town’s lands; also that a com. treat with Indian Ned for lands beyond Herring River.” In 1699, “the Grammar Schoolmaster” was voted £10; “he to teach reading, writing and arithmetic.” In 1700, it was “ ordered that the selectmen see that the meet- ing-house is ground-pinned and the windows mended.” — Towns- men admitted were John Blackwell, Gideon Hoxie, Eben. Wing, Nathan Bourne, Sami. Perry Jr., Jashub Wing. Joseph Holway, Jireh Swift, Mr. Thos. Smith d. this year, Dec. 9. He was town-treasurer.2 1 Mr. Fessenden’s letter has it, “Nov. 28, 1694, after much discussion and trouble, the Rev. Mr. C. was ord. by laying on the hands of Revs. John Cotton Jr., Ichabod Wiswall, and Jona. Russell. Cotton gave the charge, and Wiswall the right hand of fellowship.” 2 Mr. Thomas Smith, b. 1664, was the 8th s. of Rev. John Smith. By his wife Abigail who m. 2d Col. Melatiah Bourne, he had Samuel Jan. 18,84 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1701, the sum of £10 was raised “ to pay James Battersby the schoolmaster in the S.E. end of the town.”—“John Bradford, and Wm. Shurtleff, two of the selectmen of Plym., and James War- ren agent; with Wm. Bassett and Dan. Allen, selectmen of Sand- wich, being app. to settle the bounds between the two towns, met and agreed upon the same, April 9.”1 — In like manner, “ James 1688-9; John Feb. 7, 1689-90; Thomas Dec. 25, 1691; Isaac Feb. 11, 1693-4; Abigail Jan. 17, 1695-6; Rebecca Nov. 7, 1697 who m. Rev. Benj. Fessenden, Oct. 18,1724; and Shubael Nov. 20, 1699. — Samuel, the eldest, m. Bethia Chipman Oct. 6, 1717 and had Thomas Sept. 7, 1718; Samuel Feb. 19, 1720; Abigail Dec. 16, 1722 who m. Sand. Thaxter of Hing. Aug. 18, 1743 ; Bethia Dec. 10, 1724 who m. Thos. Loring of Hing. June 2, 1743; Mary May 18, 1727 who m. Calvin Gay Esq. of Hing. Ap. 2, 1752; John Sept. 12, 1729; Rebecca July 19, 1731 who m. Elisha Bis- by of Pembroke Aug. 2, 1750; Shubael June 10, 1733 who d. 1751; Ste- phen May 30, 1739 who d. early; Deborah May 6, 1737 ; Stephen May 30, 1739; Lucy and Lydia, gemmae, Nov. 3, 1741, the first of whom d. ae. 3 weeks, and the other m. Joseph Loring of Hing. Oct. 27, 1763. — The eldest of this last family, Dr. Thomas Esq., studied his profession in Hing., and there m. Sarah Cushing dr. of Danl.; after her d. he m. 2d, Martha (Mayhew) Parker wid. of Sylvs. of F. and then removed to Woods Hole; and 3d, Rachel (Doane) Bacon wid. of Judge B. of Barnstable, and dr. of Isaiah Doane of Wellfleet. Issue : Deborah July 8, 1739 b. in Hing. and d. Feb. 1, 1748-9; Lydia Jan. 23, 1740-1, b. in this town; Thomas Jr. Jan. 25, 1742-3 ; Sarah Dec. 3,1744, who m. Neh. Webb Dec. 30, 1762; Sam- uel Nov. 11, 1746; Percy Sept. 25, 1748; Deborah Dec. 14, 1750, who m. Nathl. Swift of F.; Shubael Dec. 4,1752; Daniel Sept. 27,1754; Bethia Sept. 22, 1756, who m. Ichabod Hatch of F.; Cushing Aug. 6,1758, who m. a dr. of Rev. John Smith of Danbury, Ct. and had Lydia who now resides at F.; and, by 2d m., Martha who m. Calvin Morse of F. — Stephen Esq., b. 1739, s. of Samuel, m. Deborah Ellis Dec. 23,1762, and had Stephen Nov. 6, 1763; Deborah Feb. 22,1766, who m. Col. Joseph Wallis Jr.; Wm. Ellis Dec. 8, 1767; Samuel Dec. 28,1769 ; Joseph Otis Jan. 31,1772, all in this town; when, removing to Machias, he had Jane, Lydia, Eliza. Otis, and George Stilman. Mr. Smith was a man of much note, and d. in M. Sept. 29, 1806. — We might write volumes containing genealogical and other interesting data of the different branches of the descendants of Rev. John Smith; but we must be content with brevity. We cannot forbear, however, out of respect for that most excellent and very intelligent lady, the late Bethia Smith (who taught us the very first rudiments, from Webster’s Spelling-book) to make record of the family of her father, Capt. Samuel, b. 1746, who was s. of Dr. Thomas Smith, and d. June 17, 1809. By his m. with Mercy Sears Oct. 24, 1773, he had Mehitable July 22, 1774, who m. Jireh Phin- ney of Machias; Deborah Ap. 10, 1777; Bethia July 10, 1781, who d. 1856 ; Mercy Sept. 23, 1783 ; and Samuel July 31,1780. 1 “ Beginning at the Picket-Clift by the Sea-side; thence running S. W. a little more westerly by marked range-trees to a rock on the westerly side of Herring Pond about two rods from its mouth; thence running on a straight line to a marked pine tree standing near the southerly end of the Little Pond below the dwelling-house of John Gibbs Jr.; and thence on a straight line to a marked pine tree standing by the fence of the meadow of Benj. Gibbs by the Red Brook, and so runs rounding up as the fence of sd. meadow runs to sd. brook, and so is bounded by this brook unto the Bay or salt water.”ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 85 Gorham and Ebenr Lewis, selectmen of Barnstable, and Wm. Bas- sett, John Smith, and Dan. Allen, selectmen of this town, with the help of Maj. John Thacher of Barnstable,” determined the bounds between their respective towns, May 19.1—And u Thos. Bour- man and Melatiah Bourne, selectmen of Sackonesset, alias Falm., and John Smith and Wm. Bassett, selectmen of Sandwich, met and settled the bounds between these two towns.”2 In 1702, the town gave to Rev. Roland Cotton “ all such drift- whales as shall, during the time of his ministry in Sandwich, be driven or cast ashore within the limits of the town, being such as shall not be killed with hands.” — It was voted “ to enlarge and repair the meeting-house, the expense not to exceed £ 50.” — A list of the freemen, as ordered June 25, was: John Allen Sr., Dan. Butler, Sami. Gifford, John Allen Jr., John Chipman, Rd. Handy, Rich. Allen, Roland Cotton, Joseph Holway, Wm. Allen, Edw. Dillingham, Gid. Hoxie, John Barlow, Hy. Dillingham, Lud. Hoxie, Nathan Barlow, John Dillingham, John Jennings, Wm. Bassett, Matthias Ellis, Sami. Knott, Neh. Bessie, Mord. Ellis, Sami. Lawrence, John Blackwell, John Fish, Oliver Norris, Josh. Blackwell, Edm. Freeman Sr., Benj. Nye, Mich. Blackwell, Edm. Freeman Jr., Caleb Nye, Elisha Bourne, Benj. Gibbs, Jona. Nye, Nathan Bourne, John Gibbs, John* Nye, Sheaij. Bourne, Sami. Gibbs, Nathan Nye, Timo. Bourne, Thos. Gibbs, Edw. Perry, Jacob Burge, John Gifford, Ezra Perry Sr., 1 “ Beginning at a great stone set in the ground below and near the dwell- ing-house of Jedediah Jones by an old stump, and thence running down to the sea by a N. E. line as two stakes are set up in the meadow ranging with sd. great stone; and then running up from sd. stone on a S. W. line as the line was now run by Maj. Thacher 5 miles up into the woods unto a pine tree marked on four sides, standing near to and on the northerly side of the path that leads from the dwelling-house of Shearj. Bourne Esq. unto the house of John Goodspeed above a deep bottom that hath a hole of water in it; sundry range-trees being marked and some heaps of stones laid in the range.” 2 “ Beginning at the spring near the dwelling-house of Robert Lawrence, called Hope’s Spring, and thence running on an easterly straight line unto the middlemost of three pine trees that stand on the S. E. side of the cart- way that leads from Sandwich to Falmouth a little above a small pond or hole of water that is between Ashimuet Pond, so called, and sd. cart-way, which sd. pine tree is marked on four sides; and from that marked pine tree to run on the same straight line to the Christian Indians’ land.”86 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. John Perry, Sami. Perry, Sami. Prince, Sam. Sanderson, Steph. Skifl? Benj. Smith, John Smith Sr., John Smith Jr., Shubael Smith, Eph. Swift, Jireh Swift, Wm. Swift, Gershom Tobey, Jona. Tobey, John Tobey, Nathan Tobey, Sami. Tobey, Thos. Tobey, Israel Tupper, Thos. Tupper Sr., Danl. Wing, Ebenr. Wing, John Wing, Nathl. Wing. Sheaij. Wing, Steph. Wing. In 1703, it was voted to appropriate £200 “to build a new meeting-house if found necessary.” — Townsmen ad. this year: Danl. Allen, John Landers, Sami. Swift, John Bodfish, Benj. Perry, Eldad Tupper. Ezra Bourne, John Pope, In 1704, Mr. Battersby was still teaching for £10 per annum. —It was “ordered that £3 be paid above what is allowed by the Province law, for every grown wolf, and 15 s. for every wolf’s whelp, if killed within the town’s limits.”—The inscription upon a grave-stone in the old burial-ground indicates a shipwreck this year, near by.1 2 3 *—Zach. Jenkins was ad. townsman. In 1705, the bounds between this town and Marshpeewere set- tled ; “ Caleb Popmit, Acapesko, Old John, Sunkation, and Caleb Pognit, agents of the South-sea Indians of Mashbe, and Sheaij. Bourne, Wm. Bassett, Matthias Ellis, and Hy. Dillingham, agents for this town,” being app. to run the line.8 1 He was s. of Mr. James Skiff, one of ths earliest settlers of the town, who by his w. Mary who d. Sept. 21, 1673, had James Sept. 12, 1638 who removed to the Vineyard ; Stephen Ap. 14, 1641; Nathl. Mar. 20, 1645; Sarah Oct. 12, 1646 ; Bathsheba Ap. 20, 1648; Mary Mar. 25, 1650; Pa- tience Mar. 25, 1652; Benj. Nov. 15, 1655; and Nathan May 16, 1658, who prob. went to Chilmark. — Stephen Esq., by his w. Lydia who d. a wid. Mar. 17, 1713, had Abigail May 2, 1666; Deborah July 14, 1668; Mary Nov. 13, 1671; and Stephen Feb. 4, 1685. * Here lyes y® body of Capt. Peter Adolph of New Yorke aged 48 years, who dyed by shipwreck in this bay, y*5 * * 16th of March 1702-3 and was washed on shoare 3 miles below this towne. 3 “Beginning at a pine tree marked on four sides, standing near to and on the northerly side of the path that leads from the now dwelling house of Sheari. Bourne Esq. unto the house of John Goodspeed above the deep bottom that hath a hole of water in it, sundry trees being marked from the aforesaid tree northeasterly to a red-oak sapling standing at the northerly end of Wakpah Field, marked on two sides, with stones about it, near the cart-way that leads from Sandwich to the house of Sheaij. Bourne Esq.; from the above red-oak sapling to run westerly to the road that leads from Sandwich to Falmouth, leaving the southernmost branch of Peter’s Pond to the northward; then southerly as the road leads from Sandwich toANNALS OF SANDWICH. 87 In 1706, “a purchase was made by the town of lands, of Zach- ariah Sias, Indian—a tract at Herring River, on the W. side of the line run between the town and Indians’ lands; ” and it was “ ordered that in laying out and dividing lands lying in common, one share shall be reserved for the use forever of such as shall hereafter be employed here in the work of the ministry by the major part of the inhabitants.” — Mr. Elisha Bourne, s. of Mr. Rd., d. this year; also Mr. Thos. Tupper Sr. In 1707, “a further division was made of the 40 acre lots.” — Leave was granted to certain persons “to box and milk two thousand pine trees, for two yrs., £2 to be pd. to the town for the use.” — An appropriation of £20 was made to secure the services of Mr. Thos. Prince “ to instruct the children in reading, writing, arithmetic, and Latin,” and provision was made that “ they who send shall pay £10 more.”1—The sum of 4 s. per day was fixed upon as “ the pay of the town’s representatives in Gen. Court.” — The town engaged to pay for wolves £4 “ in addition to wbat is provided by law.” In 1708, it was “ agreed in town-meeting that the person who takes care of the meeting-house shall ring the bell.” And further —probably in consequence of representations made to the Gen. Ct. and its action on the same — that in future Mr. Cotton shall have £70 pr. annum, and £20 for fire-wood and to enable him to fence the ministerial lands.” In 1709, “ the sum of £20 and his diet” was voted to the school- master, “ he to board round.” In 1710, Mr. Samuel Jennings was the school-master. He was voted £20, and it was provided “that those who send shall pay additional and board.”2 — It was “ voted to raise the window seats Falm. aforesaid till it comes to a pine tree standing at the westerly side of Ashimuet Pond which is the bound between the towns of Falmouth and Sandwich; the Indians to have, hold and enjoy all the lands to the south- ward and eastward of the abovesaid line forever; and the town of Sand- wich to have, hold and enjoy all the lands lying northward and westward of the abovesaid bounds.” 1 It may be unnecessary to remark that Mr. Prince to whom reference is here made, was the same who afterwards became the minister of the Old South Church in Boston—the noted author of the New England’s Annals. * It is impossible, after much investigation, to give so satisfactory ac- count as we would wish, of the Jennings family. Mitchell says, “Rd. put himself apprentice to Rt. Bartlett of Plym. 1635 for 9 yrs.; ” also that Rd. of Bridgw. had a legacy in Frs. Godfrey’s will 1666, and was called “ kinsman by Wm. Bassett Jr. of Sandwich 1694; ” and he supposes “ that Rd. who d. in B. 1751, perhaps from Sandwich, and whose wife was Mary Bassett who d. 1734, was from the above.” Mr. Savage says, “ Rich- ard was some time in Sandwich.” Mr. Baylies says, “ Samuel came from Eng., a town called Bennister, and settled in Sandwich; had a bro. who88 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. of the west gallery of the meeting-house.” — Also “ voted to grant liberty to Mr. Nathaniel Otis to set a house on the commons near Peter Newcomb’s — somewhere between sd. Newcomb’s house and the mill.”1 sailed out of Eng., a captain in the merchant-service ; and that, after the decease of that brother, Samuel went to Eng. to recover the estate, but was impressed on board a ship of war, and in attempting to escape in one of the W. India ports lost a hand and foot—bitten off by a shark;” and that he was then “ 19 yrs. of age.” All this is very circumstantial, and chiefly correct; for, on referring to Hon. Francis Bassett who is a lineal descendant from this Samuel Jennings Esq., we learn that the escape from a man-of-war by swimming and the loss of limbs consequent upon it, were not only subject of family tradition, but he recollects having had in his pos- session a published account of the adventure, as communicated by Mr. Jen- nings to Rev. Dr. Stillman. — From the Sandwich records, we find that Mr. John Jennings is mentioned in the list of freemen in 1702; and that, by his wife Susanna, his children were a daughter (name illegible) b. Sept. 17, 1668, who prob. was Remember who m. Joseph Buck, his 2d wife, Sept. 20, 1686; Anne b. 8 mo. 17, 1670; John 3, 12, 1673, by wife Ruhaman; a son, (name illeg., but) prob. Isaac, July 3, 1677 ; Elizabeth Ap. 4, 1680 who d. Sept. 13, 1682; and Samuel Feb. 28, 1684-5. And this last was, doubtless, the person whose adventures are narrated. If so, he was prob. not born in England as has been generally supposed. The family prob. came over early; and John was, it is inferred, the mariner who d. in the merchant-service. —Mr. Samuel Jennings probably devoted himself to the acquisition of a superior education in consequence of his being maimed. He was the Grammar School-master in 1710, selectman 1712, representative 1714, 17, 21, town clerk 1721-51, town treas. 1719-51, sur- veyor of lands, trader, and possessed of large estate. He m. Remember Smith, dr. of Shubael and grand dr. of Rev. John, Jan. 20, 1713, who d. Jan. 25, 1717, and then m. 2d Deborah . . . who d. Feb. 10,1753. He d., according to Baylies, May 13,1764, ae. abt 80. His children were Lydia, Feb. 6, 1714, who m. Nathan Bourne -of Scituate Sept. 6, 1733, both of whom d. in Hanover 1739; Ruhamah May 1,1716, a woman of fine educa- tion, who m. Elisha Bassett Oct. 11, 1739; Samuel Sept. 9, 1727; Esther Ap. 29,1731, who m. Jabez Tupper Feb. 14,1759; and John Sept. 3,1734. — Isaac m. 1st Rose Goodspeed, July 10,1700, who d. Dec. 21,1721, by whom he had Elizabeth Ap. 12,1701, who m. Isaac Howland May 14, 1719; Ex- perience Mar. 10, 1703, who m. Josiah Ryder of Plym. Oct. 22, 1722; John July 31, 1706; Rose 1710 who m. John Ellis Jr. Feb. 4, 1731; Isaac Ap. 24, 1714; Mary Sept. 1, 1717; Benj. Dec. 12,1720; and by 2d m. to Han- nah, had Hannah Ap. 21, 1725; Lois Feb. 7, 1727; and Eunice May 25, 1729. — John, son of Isaac, m. Anne Holway Oct. 3, 1727, and had Avis Ap. 11,1730. The last two families prob. resided in Plym. County. — John of Sandwich, son of Mr. Samuel, m. Hannah Sturgis Ap. 19, 1759, and had Deborah Dec. 7, 1760; Samuel Nov. 15, 1762, who went to Maine and m. Olive Tupper in Winthrop 1785; John Feb. 9, 1765, who also removed to Me.; Hannah Aug. 1766; Bathsheba Aug. 27, 1768; and Sarah Ap. 2, 1770. The father d. and the widow m. Dea. Thos. Bassett Mar. 15, 1775. — The Jennings family, long time prominent and highly respectable in this town, has become extinct here; but lands are still called after their name. The families first mentioned and those recorded in S., may have been of the same stock; but the records of Duxbury which was the parent town of Bridgewater having been all destroyed by fire prior to 1654, it is now im- possible to determine with certainty. 1 Mr. Nathaniel Otis was 2d s. of Col. John, and bro. of Col. James 1st.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 89 In 1711, “Mr. James Dorr was employed as a school-master” with a salary of £20. — Mr. Thomas Tobey d. Jan. 9. In 1712, “ Mr. Samuel Osborn lately of Edgartown, was em- ployed at a salary of £25;” and Mr. Jennings was also “still employed.” This seems to have been the dawn of an age of im- provement in respect to schools. In 1713, it was “voted to pay Mr. Osborn £60, in bills of cred- it, per annum, for three years; he to teach in addition to the usual branches, Latin and Greek, and make three removes each year, i. e. teaching in the centre four months, in Scusset four, and in Spring- Hill four, each yr., those who send to pay to the town for pupils in reading alone 3 s. per week, writing additional 5 s., reading, writing, and arithmetic 6 s., and Latin and Greek 8 s., — children from other towns to be admitted.”1 — A greater effort to sustain 1 Mr. Samuel Osborn is the same gent, who was subsequently settled in the ministry at Eastham, continuing from 1718 to 1737, and who is reported as having d. long after “ in Boston, ae. above 90.” He was b. in Ireland, of Scottish parents, and grad. Univ. Dublin. He was a fine scholar. His son John, b. in Sandwich 1713, grad. H. C. 1735, was alsoamanof fine scholastic attainments. He has been pronounced “ a lively genius.” Dis- playing in college “ great talents for mathematical investigations,” he acquired also some poetic celebrity. His “ whaling song ” was long famil- iar with seamen, and we present it as a reminiscence of a Sandwich boy’s attempt to court the Muse: “ When Spring returns with western gales, And gentle breezes sweep The ruffling seas, we spread our sails To plow the wat’ry deep; For killing northern whales prepar’d, Our nimble boats on board With craft and rum (our chief regard,) And good provisions stor’dj Cape Cod, our dearest,* native land, We leave astern, and lose Its sinking cliffs and lessening sands* Whilst Zephyr gently blows. Bold, haray men, with blooming age, Our sandy shores produce; With monstrous fish they dare engage, And dangerous callings choose. Now towards the early dawning East, We speed our course away With eager minds and joyful hearts, To meet the rising day ; Then as we turn our wond’ring eyes, We view one constant show; Above, around, the circling skies, The rolling seas below. When eastward, clear of Newfoundland, We stem the frozen pole, We see the icy islands stand, The northern billows roll. As to the North we make our way, Surprising scenes we find ; We lengthen out the tedious day, And leave the night behind $ We see the northern regions where Eternal winter reigns, One day and night fills up the year, And endless cold maintains j We view the monsters of the deep, Great Whales in numerous swarms, And creatures there that play and leap, Of strange, unusual forms. When in our station we are placed, And whales around us play, We launch our boats into the main, And swiftly chase our prey. In haste we ply our nimble oars, For an assault designed; The sea beneath us foams and roars, And leaves our wake behind; A mighty whale we rush upon, And in our irons throw : She sinks her monstrous body down Among the depths below; But when she rises out again, We soon renew the fight, Thrust our sharp lances m amain, And all her rage excite. Enraged, she makes a mighty bound, Thick foams the whiten’d sea, The waves in circles rise around, And wid’ning roll away. From numerous wounds, with crimson flood She stains the frothy seas, And gasps, and blows her latest blood, While quiv’ring life decays. With joyful hearts we see her die And on the surface lay While all with eager haste apply To save our deathful prey.” This song is said to be much excelled by his “ elegy on the death of a young sister,” preserved in the ‘ Boston Mirror.* — After completing his VOL. n. 1290 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. schools of high grade, was accompanied by other favorable symp- toms ; an order was passed directing the selectmen “ to get the glass of the meeting-house mended, shutters for the windows, door-latches mended, and provide a lock.” An appropriation was also made “ for a turret on the meeting-house.” In 1714, the town had some trouble by reason of discontent among the Indians in regard to the lands they had ceded; and the selectmen were required to go to Plym. “ to defend the town’s title against Indian claims.” Of 1715, except the decease of Mr. Mordecai Ellis, an aged and respected citizen, there is nothing notable. The only inci- dent we can gather is that u the town was presented at the Court of Sessions for not having a pound.”—And all that we can relate of 1716 is, that Rev. Mr. Cotton was voted “ the privilege of pas- turing his horse in the burying-ground—he to fence it in, joining each end of the fence to the mill-pond.” In 1717, the subject of “ a fence from Picket Clift1 to Way- quansett Bay, to keep the wolves from coming into the county,” was agitated, and the plan was thought to be highly important. The town clerk was instructed “ to confer with the several towns on the Cape ” to ascertain “ if they will respectively furnish their proportion of £ 500 to make a good board fence of more than six ft. high;” and the clerk was directed to “promise in behalf collegiate course, young Osborn joined his father in Eastham, and assayed a preparation for the clerical office. In due time, he was permitted to deliver his trial-sermon before the assembled clergy of the county. All admitted that the production was ingenious, but as unanimously adjudged it not perfectly orthodox. It should, in justice, be said that the young man studied theology not from choice, but to please his father to whose aspi- rations only the result was a disappointment. The son then turned his attention to medicine, with greater success. He m. a Miss Doane of Chat- ham, and removed to Middletown, Ct., where he d. May 31,1753, ae. 40. He was not only distinguished as a physician, but also as a chemist. He had six children, of whom John b. Mar. 17, 1741, was especially distinguished, preeminent as a physician, and died in Middletown 1825. A son of this last, John C., b. 1766, was the noted physician of Newbem, N. C.; after- wards, 1807, Prof, of Med. in Columbia College, and subsequently in the N. Y. Col. of Physicians and Surgeons, and d. at the island St. Croix, 1819. — The tomb-stone of the Dr. John . b. in Sandwich, stills stands in the ancient burying-place at M., and shews the following: “ Here is interred the mortal remains of Doctor John Osborn. Ask nothing further, travel- ler ; nothing better can be said, nothing shorter. Ob. 31 May, 1753, JE. 40. Life how short, Eternity how long!99 The monument on -which is this engraving, had formerly a very pompous inscription furnished by one of the executors; but when the son came of age, he had the whole effaced and the above substituted. 1 We follow the record; whether this was the ancient name, or whether Peaked Cliff was intended, we are unable to say.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 91 of this town that whatever the fence shall cost more than £500 shall be borne by this town alone.” Falm. acceded to the propo- sition ; the rest declined. In this dilemma, the town’s represen- tative was “instructed to apply to the Gen. Ct. for an Act requir- ing the towns below, in consideration of the great'destruction of sheep by wolves, to bear their part of the expense of a fence across the isthmus, sufficient to exclude wolves.” It is hardly necessary to say the application was unsuccessful. The scheme was not so visionary as many later enterprises; but local interests were supposed to conflict.—Leave was granted to sundry persons “ to set up a saw-mill upon the brook at Spring Hill; ” to others to build a dam across Scusset harbor to prevent the overflow of the meadows; ”1 and to others “ to set up a saw-mill at Herring River, somewhere between the grist-mill and the pond’s mouth ” — under certain restrictions. Until the year 1718, large quantities of herring had been taken from the river, for fertilizing the soil; the whole surplus exceed- ing the quantity required for food: it was now “ ordered that no herrings shall be taken in future to * fish corn.’ ” In 1719, Mr. Jacob Btjbge died, Mar. 17.2 1 The remains of this dike are yet to be seen. It is not impossible or improbable that the project may be in part revived at some day, of closing the entire meadows south of the principal creek, from the action of the sea. These marshes, if permitted to be overflowed in winter only, would be of great value as cranberry bogs ; or might be converted into English meadows. 2 Mr. Jacob Burge {Burgess is, by corruption, the modem name) was a prominent citizen, son of Mr. Thomas Burge who was in S. in 1637, dep- uty 1646, &c., and d. Feb. 27, 1685, ae. 82. Jacob m. Mary, dr. Benj. Nye, June 1, 1660, and had Samuel Mar. 8, 1671; Ebenr.-Oct. 2, 1673; Jacob Oct. 18, 1676; and Thomas Mar. 29, 1680; perhaps others. — Jacob, son of Jacob, by his wife Mary, had Zaccheus Mar. 9, 1704-5; Jedidah July 29, 1706, who m. Thos. Phillips of Dux. Dec. 4, 1729; Abia Ap. 14, 1708; Abigail June 29,1709; Samuel Nov. 2, 1711; and Jacob Nov. 9, 1715.— Zaccheus, eldest son of Jacob 2d, by his wife Temperance who d. Dec. 8, 1748, had Josiah who removed to Fairfield, Me.; Thomas (called by dis- tinction “ Honest Tommy ”) who also went to Me.; Elisha 1743; and Jedida 1745, who m. Eleazar Blackwell Dec. 8, 1763. —Elisha, of the last family, m. Hannah Nye of Falm., and had Betsey 1774 who prob. m. Elisha Gibbs 1797; Elisha; Abia Feb. 11, 1776; Benjamin Aug. 26, 1778; Rebecca Nov. 22,, 1781, who m. Thos. Ellis; Hannah Feb. 6, 1783; Jacob Sept. 19, 1786 '; Hephzibah Ap. 5, 1788 who m. Sami. Harlow of Mid.; and Anson Dec. 2, 1791, who m. Mary* Crocker. Mr. Elisha Burgess d. Nov. 10, 1832, se. 89. — Benjamin Esq., of the last family, m. Mary, dr. of Mr. Clark Swift, June 3, 1804, who d. Jan. 29, 1861, SB. 78; and their issue was Adaline June 20, 1805, who m. Nathan B. Gibbs and d.; Mary Sept. 2, 1807, who m. 1st, Hirah Ellis, 2d, Enos Briggs ; Thomas T. Feb. 10, 1810, who m. Achsah Gibbs, and d. July 18, 1834; Eliza Swift Mar. 24,1813, who m. N. B. Gibbs ; Hephzibah Feb. 7, 1816, who m. Dr. Alanson Abbe; Benj. Franklin Sept. 6, 1818, who m.92 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1720, Mr. John Rogers was employed as school-master.1 In 1721, “Maj. Bourne, Stephen Skiff, and Edw. Dillingham, were app. trustees for receiving the town’s proportion of the pub- lic loan; ” and it was “ ordered that no individual shall receive of the same more than £50, nor at less than 6 pr. ct. int.” — Col. Wii. Basset, chief Marshal and Reg. Prob., d. Sept. 29, se. 65. In 1722, the town was deprived of the valuable and faithful services of the Rev. Roland Cotton who died March 29.2 A letter of condolence and sympathy was addressed to the people by the united act of the minis- ters in the county, containing advice appropriate to the circumstances of the town. The letter was read in town- meeting, and the meeting unanimously “ voted to accept the advice of the ministers.” Major Melatiah Bourne, William Bassett, and Eliakim Tupper of the church, and Ezra Bourne, John Blackwell, and Stephen Skiff of the congregation, were chosen a “ committee to sup- ply the pulpit” In the course of the year, a com- mittee was appointed “ to treat with Madam Elizabeth Cotton for the purchase of her dwelling-house and lands for the settlement of a minister; ” and the town concurred with the church in calling Mr. Benjamin Fes- Cordelia dr. of Capt. Abner Ellis; and Caroline Beal Mar. 1, 1821, who m. Fred. W. Sawyer Esq. of Boston, Sept. 18, 1849. Benjamin Burgess Esq. was many years representative from this town, and has filled various offices, but is distinguished especially as an enterprising and successful merchant. 1 Mr. Rogers had by his wife Ann, Armemaryvetta Feb. 26, 1719 — (the giving of such a name is almost presumptive of pedagoguism ;) Wil- liam May 28, 1721; and Kathrine 1725, who m. Zebulon Wing. — “ Lt. Joseph” was in S. early. — Mr. Sami. Osborn, who preceded Mr. Rogers, was not only a fine scholar, but a ready debater, as we infer from the journal of Benj. Holme, an English minister of the Friends, who visited this town in 1715 at the time of ‘yearly meeting/ and soon after published an account of “ Travels in America,” in which he recounts “ a dispute with one Sami. Osborne a school-master.” Lest Mr. O. should be unduly censured for taking up the gauntlet in Friends* meeting, it is but proper to state that his doing so is not subject of complaint on the part of Mr. H. who says that he himself had held a similar disputation at a Presbyterian meet- ing at Nantucket, also with Timo. Ruggles at Sippecan, as also in many other places. Nor did Mr. H. find New England alone opposed to his views; for, going to Virginia, he says he “ was opposed and persecuted there.” 2 See Vol. I. 361.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 93 senden to the pastorate.1 The salary voted was “ £90, besides the use of parsonage lands and meadows; for a settlement in addition £250.” Mr. F. was ord. Sept. 12. —In making legal assessments it was necessary to include the whole town; but the kind and tolerant feeling that now happily prevailed, is seen in the fact that it was soon voted that “ the interest of the town’s Loan-money, shall be appropriated to pay the ministerial tax laid on the people called Quakers; the balance to be paid out of the town treasury, and thus from year to year.”2 In 1723, Mr. James Stewart d., Oct. 30.3 In 1724, Maj. Bourne was app. “ to answer for the town at Barn- stable #court, to the presentment cfor not having a school-master approbated according to law.’ ” 4 In 1726, it was voted “ to build a poor-house between the town’s pound and mill-river.”—In 1727, the Act having passed for a new issue of Bills of Credit, the town received its proportion from the Provincial treasury, “ to be loaned to the inhabitants on good real or personal est. security; to no one more than £20.” — And in 1729, a com. was chosen “to answer the presentment cfor not having a minister settled and qualified according to law.’ ” 5 In 1730, Mr. John Rogers was still, as for some time after, in the 1 Mr. Fessenden’s memoranda say: “June 26, 1722, the day of my election and call.” 2 This, to be sure, was not an entire exemption of the Friends, but was a compromise that qualified the extent of grievance. 3 Mr. Stewart, (or Stuart,) by his wife Desire had Seth Ap. 2, 1690; Abigail June 4, 1692; Gamaliel Mar. 15, 1694-5; Mary July 22, 1698; James Feb. 24, 1700—1; Mehitable Ap. 10, 1704; Sylvanus Mar. 19, 1706. — Seth m. Sarah Weeks June 14, 1716, had a family and d. Jan. 4,1751-2. — Gamaliel m. Alice Gibbs Sept. 23,1724, and had Lemuel Dec. 29, 1725; Bruce May 20, 1728; Mehit. Aug. 4, 1730; Seth Ap. 2, 1733; Gamaliel Oct. 28,1735; and James May 22, 1738. — James m. Mehit. Spooner Aug. 30, 1733, and had Mehit. July 17, 1735, and removed to the Vineyard. 4 It was necessary that school-masters be approbated by the magistrates, and such approbation was sometimes withheld for reasons not satisfactory to the people. — We cannot infer, from all the data before us, that the position of the minister was without its trials. Mr. Fessenden makes a mem. Oct. 24,1724, of certain members having “ gone to Barnstable to receive the sacrament,” and of “ a solemn transaction, Feb. 23, 1725,” by which members were “ bound to a united worship.” 5 It is very evident that difficulties of some kind existed in the church, and that these were culminating for a rupture will hereafter appear. The union of church and state, in an important sense, was still intimate. Minis- ters not ‘ approbated ’ by the public authorities, were sure to find their path beset with thorns. The proceedings of a people in the settlement of a min- ister, must be had with ail due deference to the powers supreme, or trouble was inevitable. The presentment, in this instance, was founded on allega- tions of the disaffected, and, the record of Court says,was “ quashed”94 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. town’s service as a school-master. The relative population at this period, of different parts of the town, is shown by the arrangements for the school: u first at Peter’s-Pond four months; then at Spring- Hill five mos.; Centre twelve mos.; Scusset five mos.; Pocasset three mos.; and Manomet three mos., in succession.”1 1 According to Mr. Fessenden's mem., Mar. 1730, there were 136 families in the town, besides Friends or Quakers. He gives that number of “ Heads of Fam.” We will not give them alphabetically, but follow his own arrangement, as it probably indicates their localities: “ Joseph Lawrance, Sami. Lawrance, Sami. Swift, Eph. Swift & Sarah his w., Moses Swift, Hannibal Handy, Isaac Handy, John Handy, Nathl. Wing, Cornelius Handy, Zachs. Handy, Wid. Wing, ltd. Handy, Ebenr. Wing, Nathan Barlow, Peleg Barlow&Eliza. his w., SamL Swift Jr., Jona. Tobey, John Perry Jr., Elijah Perry, Sami. Perry, John Perry, Elisha Perry, Ezra Perry, Benj. Perry, Benj. Perry Jr., Abner Perry, Sami. Perry Jr., Wid. Perry, Ezra Perry Jr., Nathan Bourne and Mary his w., Eleazar Bourne, Benj. Gibbs, Jona. Bourne, Deacon Tim. Bourne and Temp, his w., Tim.Perry & Desire his w., John Ellis & Sarah his w., Wid. Morton, JosiahEllis & Sarah his w., Josiah Swift, Jireh Swift, Joseph Swift, Jabez Swift & Abigail his w. Wid. Gibbs, John Blackwell and Lydia Thos. Gibbs Sr., Thos. Gibbs Jr., Sami. Gibbs Sr., Sami. Gibbs Jr., Jacob Burge, Sami. Blackwell, Medad Tupper, Micah Blackwell, Joshua Blackwell, Joshua Blackwell Jr., Joshua Blackwell 3d, Thos. Burges, Lt. Matthias Ellis Sr., Malachi Ellis, Eldad Tupper, Eliakim Tupper, Dea. Israel Tupper & w. Sami. Tupper, [Eliza., Seth Stewart, Seth Fish, Matthias Ellis Jr., John Bodfish, Isaac Jennings, Wid. Pope, Seth Pope Jr., Gamaliel Stewart, Lt. Wm. Bassett, John Freeman, Wm. Newcomb and Bath, his w., Seth Pope Sr., Bd. Essex, John Foster, John Chipman, Nathan Nye Jr., Joseph Foster, Cornelius Gibbs, Ezra Bourne Esq., Ebenr. Howland, Joseph Hatch, John Tobey Sr., Tohn Tobey Jr., Eleazar Tobey, Bd. Garrett, Nathl. Fish, SamL Barber, John Barlow, Sami. Barlow, Nathan Tobey, Wm. Tobey, Edw. Dillingham Sr., Cornelius Tobey, Sami. Tobey, Gershom Tobey, Seth Tobey, Col. Melh. Bourne, Silas Bourne, Simeon Dillingham, Joseph Nye Sr., Ebenr. Perry, Sami. Jennings, Sami. Smith, John Smith, Capt. Stephen Skiff, Bd. Landers, Peleg Nye, Ebenr. Nye, John Landers, Benj. Freeman, Wid. Freeman, Wm. Freeman, James Atkins, John Vilking, Edm. Freeman, John Fish Sr., John Fish Jr., Tim. Nye, Jona. Nye, Joseph Nye, Benj. Nye, SamL Saunders, Shubael Jones, Nathan Nye, Samuel Nye, Sylv. Gibbs, Fllkanah Smith, Balph Jones Jr., Nathan Landers, SoL Davis, Thos. Hicks.”ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 95 That a very considerable disaffection was manifest in the church at this time, appears from the town records, but especially from Mr. Fessenden’s copies of letters and other memorandums, as well as from transient documents.1 Church meetings, councils, and remon- strances, succeeded each other, and much unquiet is noticeable.2 Many attempts were made to restore unity, but without success. In 1731, a committee was chosen by the town “to answer in General Court the petition of Mr. Eldad Tupper made in behalf of the disaffected portion of the church.”3 1 The following letter addressed by Hon. Mel. Bourne to Mr. Fessenden, Boston, Feb. 1730, is before us: “I have been to wait on Mr. Prince to know what the Assoc, did yesterday on our affair, and he saith that they all agree that Mr. Ellis hath broke in upon the Constitution of our churches, and he hath sent a letter to them to justify his conduct, and saith that what they had done ought to stand gooa until reversed by another council ; but the Assoc, are not of his mind; more especially because he took a wrong step, &c.; and they have chose a committee to draw up something to send to Mr. Ellis to show him his error in his late proceedings at Sandw., and was about to send to him in another manner, but thought to use gen- tleness.” The copy retained by Mr. F. of another letter, addressed by himself to Bov. Mr. Weld, Sab. Morn., May 24, 1730, opens as follows: “ I am this morning informed that you are come to preach to a part of the church in this place who have separated themselves,” &c. &c. He objects to the proceeding as irregular &c.; and closes: “ These are therefore to invite you to the public pulpit to-day, to carry on all the pub. services of the day, that so yours may be a joint worship which will be most pleasing to God and acceptable to all good men.” — A similar letter was addressed to Mr. Ward Cotton, subsequently, and closes by saying, “Therefore out of respect to the memoir of your good father, &c. I shall concede to your hav- ing the use of the public pulpit this coming Sabbath,” &c. &c. * Reference is made to a Council assembled June 1729, and to a Council to be convened Oct. 1730, both called by the disaffected; and a memorial to the last from Mr. F. and the church, is before us. But it is impossible to understand the true causes of dissatisfaction. 3 It is difficult at this remote period to apprehend precisely the position of Mr. Tupper. That he was a member of the ancient church in S. is evi- dent; and that he was at this time exercising his ministry among the Indians. Tradition says “ he was a minister,” and records made by him of marriages and baptisms, show that at least from 1717 to 1746 he was employing himself in ecclesiastical functions. With the exception of two entries, the rite of baptism was performed only among the Indians, as were all the instances of the solemnization of marriages. The exceptions are: u 1726, — Martha Tupper and Jedidah Tupper were p. baptized; ” and u 1745, May 12, Jedidah Burge the dr. of Zacheus Burge was baptized—all by me, Eldad Tupper, Pastor of the Indian Church.”96 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1732, the town voted £110 “ for repairs of the meeting-house, and for the minister’s salary; ” also £80 for schools. — That the erection of a meeting- house, was now determinately contemplated by the opponents of the regular minister of the town, indicates that for a time at least the division of the town by religious differences is inevitable.1 — Mr. Samuel Gibbs Sr. died Nov. 19. In 1733, the selectmen were app. in conjunction “ with Izak Simon, Matt. Richard, James Hamblin Jr., and Izak Simon Jr., Indian agents, to settle once more the bounds between the town and the South-sea Indians.” — Mr. Thos. Gibbs Sr. d. this year, Jan. 7. — In 1734, a com. was app. “ to see if the miller will bet- ter serve the town.” A petition was presented, Feb. 5, “ from certain per- sons disaffected towards the minister, to be released from paying for his support and to be set off as a dis- tinct precinct.” It was refused “ on the ground that the petitioners are widely scattered, and in all make less than 20 families; ” and it was voted by the town that “ the return of the disaffected is the only way to restore our ancient glory of unity and peace.” But 1 The following document found among Mr. Eldad Tupper’s papers, we copy: — “ Whereas we Jirah Swift and Eliakim Tupper of Sandwich have received two promissory notes of a number of the dissatisfied, namely, Eldad Tupper, Joshua Blackwell Jr., Thomas Smith, Samuel Blackwell, Thomas Swift, William Swift the younger, Zacheus Burge, Josiah Swift, Mordecai Blackwell, Ichabod Smith, Jacob Burge, in which notes they promise to pay us each and every man of them the sum affixed to his name, that is to say: the sd. Eldad Tupper £ 24, the sd. Joshua Blackwell Jr. £4, the sd. Thomas Smith £ 4, the sd. Sami. Blackwell £ 8, the sd. Wrm. Swift the younger £1.4, the sd. Thomas Swift £4, the sd. Zacheus Burge £4, the sd. Josiah Swift £ 10, the sd. Mord. Blackwell £1.4, the sd. Ichabod Smith £1.4, the sd. Jacob Burge £8 : all amounting to the sum of £69. 12: Know ye, that we, the sd. Jirah Swift and Eliakim Tupper, do hereby promise that in case we do not lay out the sd. sum or sums in buying or procuring boards, clapboards, shingles, and work for enclosing and finishing the meeting-house, then the sd. notes to be void and of none effect, or to be returned to them again: Otherwise to stand and remain in full force and virtue, as witness our hands this 13th day of April, A. D. 1732. Jireh Swift. Eliakim Tupper.”ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 97 these troubles were not so to terminate.1 A Council “ of Rev. Elders and messengers ” was convened Oct. 30, at the new meeting-house of the disaffected to organize a church. To this proceeding objection was made by the pastor and church, and an earnest protest and relation of facts were sent in. This application of the disaffected seems to have been unsuccessful; for In 1735, another “Council having been called to assist in forming a new church, and to ordain a pastor over it, the inhabitants in town-meeting assembled March 11, and provided a remonstrance to be sent in to the Council when assembled the next day March 12.2 A committee was also appointed to appear before the 1 Justice to Rev. Mr. Fessenden requires us to say, that he seems to have evinced a commendable desire for peace. Several overtures to the disaffected discover much fairness and a Christian spirit, much “ grief for the separation and differences,” and a “hearty desire to have love and union restored.” 2 The remonstrance is as follows : “ Whereas, it is ordained and enacted by the supreme authority of this Province, that the inhabitants of each town within this Province shall take due care from time to time to be constantly provided of an able learned orthodox minister or ministers of good conver- sation to dispense the word of God unto them. “And whereas it is further enacted by the authority aforesaid that the re- spective churches in the several towns within the Province shall at all times hereafter use, exercise, and enjoy all their privileges and freedoms respecting divine worship, church order and discipline, and shall be encouraged in the peaceable and regular profession and practice thereof. And whereas it is provided and ordained that in such towns and places where there is no church gathered, the ratable inhabitants of such town or place at a meet- ing duly warned for that purpose by the major part of such assembly then and there met, with the advice of three neighboring ordained ministers shall choose and call an orthodox, learned, and pious person to dispense the word of God unto them. Upon these laws, and we observe that by such a proceeding as above referred to, (forming a new church and ordain- ing a pastor,) the supreme authority of the Province will be oppugned, the rights and privileges of this town will be invaded, the laws of the Province will be eluded, the good order of the churches as directed by law in calling and settling their ministers will be overthrown, and an example so toler- ated and followed will threaten confusion and disorder to all the churches and towns in the Province. We, therefore, the inhabitants of Sandwich, as aforesaid, in faithfulness to our church and town, and to all the churches and towns in the Province, do bear this our seasonable and just testimony against Mr. Francis Wooster as disturbing the peace and order of this town and church in contempt and defiance of the aforesaid laws, and against that small number of our neighbors who are thus endeavoring in an illegal manner to separate from that minister and meeting-house by law established.” VOL. II. 1398 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. General Court in pursuance of the remonstrance. Mr. Francis Wooster1 was, however, ordained pastor of a new church then and there organized, and the new meeting-house at Scusset was henceforward the scene of his labors for many years. The representative to the Gen. Ct. was instructed by the town to ask “ for a grant of lands for the support of schools in the town.” — The settlement of the Indian bounds, was “confirmed by the court Nov. 27, and consented to by Gov. Belcher.” In 1786, the town “ ordered that sheep-yards be erected in differ- ent parts of the town; ” also w that all sheep be marked: ” all which was approved by the court. — Mr. William Newcomb d. Ap. 8.2 1 Rev. Francis Wooster was 2d son of Frs. b. in Rowley, who was s. of Sami. b. in England and came with his f. Rev. Wm. 1638-40 and became pastor of the ch. in Salisbury. The name is still written Wooster in Ct., but is Worcester generally elsewhere. Rev. Francis was b. in Bradford June 7, 1698, where he lived until 1722, and then in Concord and after- wards in Littleton, in which latter places he worked as a blacksmith. In 1728 he was one of the selectmen of Bradford; then resided in Boxford where he was licensed to preach, after which he came to Sandwich and was ord. June 18, 1735 “ over a church that separated ten years before from the ancient parish and continued one year subsequent to his dismission.” He then went to Exeter, N. H.; thence to Plaistow; thence to Hollis 1750 where he d. Oct. 4, 1783. “ Employed the greater part of his ministry as an Evangelist ” in the destitute parts of N. H. and other sections of N. Eng. “ Confined in weakness and in his 60th yr., he wrote a series of ‘Meditations in Verse1 which were pub. in Boston 1760.”—By m. with Abigail Carlton of Rowley Ap. 18, 1720 who d. July 25, 1774 ae. 78, he had Francis Mar. 30, 1721; Jesse Sept. 5, 1722; Hannah Oct. 7, 1724, all b. in Bradford ; Sami. May 7, 1731 b. in Boxford; and Noah Sept. 23, 1735 b. in Sandwich. — His son Francis Jr. whilst yet of S., m. Hannah Boynton of Newbury Oct. 28, 1741 and then removed to Hollis where and at Plym. N. H. he was a yeoman and deacon, and d. Ap. 28,1771. — The 2d. s. Jesse m. Patience Pope of S. Mar. 26, 1745, and had Hannah Ap. 12, 1746. He then removed to Hollis and Newbury where he had other children, and was at the siege of Oswego, taken prisoner and d. at Montreal 1757. — The youngest, Noah, b. in S., went with his f. to Hollis 1750, was capt. of a company which went 1775-6 to reenforce Gen. W. at Cambridge, was jus. pac. 40 yrs., and mem. conv. that formed the constitution of N. H.; “a man of strong mind, sound judgment, strict integrity, a proverbially safe counsellor, and active church member 60 yrs.” He d. Aug. 13, 1817 se. 82. Several of his sons were eminent divines, viz. Rev. Noah Worcester D. D., author of “ Bible News,”&c. &c.; Rev. Leonard of Peacham, Vt.; and Rev. Samuel D. D. pastor of the Tabernacle Church, Salem, and Secretary of A. B. C. F. M. 2 The first of this name in town, was Peter Newcomb who, “ late of Edgartown,” m. Mercy dr. of Shubael Smith Mar. 11, 1699-1700, and had Mercy Mar. 4, 1701; and Wm. Aug. 29, 1702.—William grad. H. C. 1722, and by his wife Bathsheba had Mercy Feb. 4, 1723 who m. John Bassett Oct. 24, 1742 ; Desire May 21, 1725 who m. Dr. Elisha Tobey Jan.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 99 In 1737, John Landers d. Mar. 4, and Samuel Tobey Sept. 22; the year following John Tobey Sr. d. Dec. 26, and the following Mar. 12, John Smith. In 1739, a com. was chosen “to enforce the Act against the unlawful killing of deer.” Mr. Nathaniel Otis1 d. this year; and Timo. Ruggles becomes an inhabitant.2 Mr. Edward Dilling- ham also d. Mar. 29. 12, 1746; Peter, Sept. 4, 1726; Mary Ap. 3, 1728; Wm. Jan. 27, 1730; Hannah June 4, 1732; Sarah Oct. 21, 1737 who m. Mr. Benj. Fessenden Oct. 19, 1760; and Thomas June 11, 1739. — William, s. of Mr. Wm., had, by his w. Elizabeth, Bathsheba Feb. 23, 1763 who m. Capt. Thos. Nye Feb. 1, 1797; Elizabeth Ap. 10, 1765 who m. Stephen Bassett Esq. Nov. 20, 1788; Rebecca July 14, 1772 who m. Capt. Allen Nye July 14, 1790; Abigail Feb. 21, 1777 who m. Sturgis Nye May 10,1795 ; William Feb. 24, 1779; and Lemuel Sept. 19,1782. 1 See Vol. I. 273. Mr. Otis was Register of Prob., and Counsellor at Law. His decease probably induced the stay of Mr. Ruggles in town. Mr. Otis m. Abigail, dr. of Rev. Jonathan Russell of Barnstable Dec. 21, 1710, and his dr. Martha bom Dec. 11, 1717 m. Edmund Freeman of the 5th generation of the name in S. Aug. 7, 1736. This maternal ancestry has suggested the Christian names of Russell and Otis in every generation of the Freemans descended from Abigail Russell and Martha Otis. 2 The name of Timothy Ruggles appears on the town records immedi- ately after the decease of Mr. Otis ; but he was here several years before. Born in Rochester Oct. 11, 1711; grad. H. C. 1732 ; practising law in his native town at the age of 24 yrs.; this son of the Rochester minister now soon contrived to be elected representative from this town, (the inhabitants of the Cape have always discovered an amiable disposition to gratify the aspirations for office of adventurers to the exclusion of the non-imported;) and, from being a guest at the tavern, he becomes the landlord. He has married the widow Newcomb; but the sign of the old inn is not therefore to come down: its post is firm enough to bear up both the advertisement of “ Entertainment ” and Mr. Ruggles’ professional * shingle.’ He proves himself indeed a man of vast endowments. Connecting with his law prac- tice the duties of innkeeper, not simply the usual offices of a taverner of olden time are his, but he personally attends both bar and stable — equally expert whether in currying a horse, mixing a cocktail, impressing his guests with the extent of his varied lore, conducting a case in court, or enlighten- ing the wisdom of the legislature by his eloquence. To whatever the ver- satility of his genius directs itself he is equally au fait He was withal endowed with military taste,and was destined to distinguish himself in that department also. He led, as Col., a body of troops to join Sir Wm. Johnson in the expedition to Crown Point 1755 ; was in the battle at Lake George only second in command ; and was three years Brig. Gen. under Lord Amherst. — Having removed to Hardwick, besides being several years representative from that town, two of which he was speaker, he received the appt. of Asso- ciate Justice of the C. C. P., and was soon Chf. Just. In 1765, a delegate with Otis and Partridge to the colonial convention, he was made President of that body. His popularity as a politician was, however, fated to wane ; the whigs became dissatisfied with his course, the H. of Reps, passed a vote of censure on his conduct, and he was reprimanded from the Speaker’s chair. His assurance, notwithstanding, never forsook him, and his brazen inso- lence knew no bound. Shrewd as a lawyer, quick of apprehension, remark- able for the boldness of his conceptions, of lordly though rude manners,100 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. A committee was chosen * to consider another peti- tion of those attending on Mr. Wooster’s ministry, to be freed from paying towards Mr. Fessenden’s salary; ” the petitioners were Moses Swift and 33 others. The result was adverse to the prayer. In 1740, a bounty was offered for the heads of crows, blackbirds, and jays. In 1742, Samuel Wing1 had “ liberty to erect a grist-mill on Spring-Hill River.” — The town w ordered that a passage be made always artful in his addresses to a jury, in fact singularly sagacious and ingenious, he was eminently qualified as a demagogue. Even when pitted against Otis and other strong men, he had influence though detested. In 1774 he was named as a mandamus councillor and proved a determined loyalist. Finding refuge in Boston until its evacuation, he then retired with the royal troops to Halifax and there organized a body of “ loyal mili- tia,” refugees, 300 strong. He d. in Nova Scotia 1798, ae. 87. With all his faults, he was temperate. Standing some inches over 6 ft., of a dark com- plexion, manly bearing, social, witty, with large knowledge of mankind, he seemed through life to realize the beau ideal of his ambition — the Magnus Apollo of his adherents. By his m. with wid. Bathsheba Newcomb 1736, he had Martha Aug. 9, 1737; Timothy Jan. 7, 1739; Mary 1741; John Sept. 30, 1742; Rd. Mar. 1744; Bathsheba 1746 ; and Elizabeth 1748. Two of his sons were in the enemy’s service in the invasion of Nantucket and in the repeated attempts to devastate this part of the country 1778-9, as was the father in the invasion of Long Island. — This note is protracted, not because Mr. Buggies was worthy, but inasmuch as he was a remarkable character for a long time exerting an influence here. We will dismiss him from further notice, with one anecdote of many related touching his career at the bar: —An aged woman had been subpoenaed as a witness. Arriv- ing before the court came in, and at a loss where to dispose of herself, she inquired of one who was passing in, green bag in hand; and he directed her to the judges’ seat. Their Honors entering soon after preceded by the tipstaff, finding their place so quietly occupied by a dame composedly enjoying her pinch of snuff, politely suggested to the lady to take some other seat. She, whether by way of apology or resistance not recognizing the judges as such, replied that she was directed to sit there. By whom? asked the Chf. Just. She pointed to Buggies, the risibles of the bar and spectators somewhat moved by the exposure. "She was, of course, con- ducted respectfully by the proper officer to another part of the court-room. The judges had not joined in the general smile; and, after taking their seats, held a momentary conference, when the Chief sternly demanded of Buggies his reason for such indecorum. The cool and characteristic reply made with more than usual nonchalance, was, “ May it please your Honor, I thought that the place for old women.” : 1 Mr. John Wing, the ancestor of families of the name, had sons Daniel, John, and Stephen by his wife Deborah who was the dr. of Bev. Stephen Bachelor. John went early from this town to Yarmouth. Daniel m. Hannah, dr. of John Swift and d. 1658-9. He had Hannah July 28, 1642; Lydia May 23, 1647; Samuel Aug. 28, 1652; Hepzibah Nov. 7, 1654; John Nov. 14, 1656; and Beulah Nov. 16, 1658. — Stephen m. Oseah Dillingham abt. 1646-7, who d. Ap. 29, 1654, and 2d. Sarah BriggsANNALS OP SANDWICH. 101 into the pond in the Centre of the town, for herrings.”—Boxes being provided by the Province for the drawing of jurors, and the towns being required to conform, “ 82 names of competent per- sons were placed in the box.” — Col. Melatiah Bourne d. Nov. 24. In 1743, the sum of £ 30 was added to Mr. Fessenden’s salary of £ 90, “ on condition that he will release the persons who attend on Mr. Wooster’s ministry, from the payment of their rates.” In 1744, “Ebenr. Wing and 23 others of Pokesit and Manomet petitioned to be released from paying to the support of Mr. Fes- senden and town schools.” — Mr. Seth Pope Sr. d. this year, Nov. 23; also Nathan Barlow, Dec. 15. In 1745, the condition on which the £30 was to be added to the nominal salary of the minister appears not to have been accept- ed; for “ Medad Tupper and 24 others attending a meeting in the meeting-house in the westerly part of the town,” were peti- tioners “ to be excused from paying for the support of Mr. Fes- senden.” The request was “ negatived.”1 The Bev. Benjamin Fessenden died Aug. 7, 1746.2 A committee was appointed, Aug. 15, to supply the pulpit, for which purpose £50 was appropriated. Provision was also made “for the occupancy of the parsonage for the present by Mrs. Bebecca Fessenden the widow of the lamented deceased.” A number of candidates for the pastorate were proposed. The question of the successor to Mr. F. was the engrossing topic for one or two years. 7 mo. 11: 1654; and had Ephraim Ap. 21, 1649 who d. inf. y Mercy Nov. 13, 1650; Stephen Sept. 2, 1656 by Sarah; Sarah Feb. 5, 1658; John Sept. 25, 1661; Abigail May 1, 1664; Ebenezer 11:5: 1671; and Mat- thias 1:1: 1673. — From the preceding have sprung numerous descend- ants whose genealogy would fill a large volume. The different branches are widely scattered, generally highly respectable; several are now rep- resented in this town. We wish we had space for an extended genealogy, that our pains in collecting it might at least be requited by the pleasure of publishing it. 1 This was the era of much excitement occasioned by the itinerant labors of the eloquent Whitefield. Whether the dissension here was influenced at all by the general feeling elsewhere is not clear. It may, perhaps, be inferred that the difficulties here were generated, as is frequently the case, by slight and latent causes leading to prejudices that soon become strangely inveterate. * See VoL L 651.102 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1747, a meeting was called “to see if the town will concur with the church in their call to Mr. Joseph Roby.” The vote was 13 in the aff. and 15 neg. The town finally voted his salary, and a settlement of £ 300 with lands and meadows; but so great was the lack of unity, that the proceedings were reconsidered and a com. was chosen to advise. Late in the year, Nov., the com. for supply were directed by special vote, “ to apply to the following persons, in succession, to be heard as candidates, viz.: Messrs* Harrington, Marsh, Torry, Lawrence, and Mr. Cotton Brown; and if none of these can be obtained, then to apply to Mr. Appleton, the Pt. of H. College, for advice.”—Mr. Nathan Nye Sr. d. this year, Nov. 27. In 1748, the question before the town being * shall we proceed to the choice of a minister ? ’ there were 25 aff. and 18 neg. It was finally “ agreed that the names of five clergymen shall be pre- sented, the town to select two from these and submit the choice from the two to the church.” The church made choice of Mr. William Lawrence; in which the town then concurred by a large majority. Mr. Lawrence not accepting, great diversity of senti- ment again existed for some time. Candidates were sought, and the settlement of some proposed and negatived; until finally, in Nov., “ Mr. Turrell was called, and £100 voted as his salary.” Dea. Elijah Perry and others were app. a com. to confer with Mr. T., but he declining the call, other candidates were proposed, and among them Mr. Williams. — Mr. Matthias Elias Sr. d. this year, Aug. 30. In 1749, Jan. 17, the town concurred with the church by a large majority in extending a call to Mr. Abra- ham Williams. It was voted that he have “ a yearly salary of £400 old tenor, or the payment of that amount in milled dollars at £2.5 per dollar, with the use of lands and meadows, and have also £1000 old tenor for a settlement” There was “ one dissentient only.” Mr. Williams gave a favorable answer, May 1, and was ordained June 14.1—Mr. Thomas Smith died Feb. 15. ^1 Mr. Williams, it has been said, labored patiently to allay the animosi- ties that had long existed resulting in the establishment of a second church. How long Rev. Mr. Wooster remained, does not clearly appear. Mar-ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 103 In 1750, Mr. Eldad Tupper, who had often repre- sented the town in General Court, and whose ecclesi- astical register shows large care of the Indians, died Sept. 15. In 1751, Mr. Joseph Rogers, the old schoolmaster, was still in the service of the town at a salary of £20 lawful money; but information was again made against the town by James Otis Esq., “ for not being provided with a school-master accord- ing to law? Agents were chosen “to answer at the General Sessions.” In 1752, Mr. Silas Tupper 1 was employed to teach the schools, “at a salary of £26.13.4 lawful money and board.” . The dissension that had long existed in regard to the ministry, was now happily abated; and, June 5, Mr. Williams welcomed back to the church twelve of the members which under his predecessor’s pastorate composed the chief part of the church at Scusset. In 1753, the bounds of Sandwich, between Barnstable and Marshpee, were again defined. — Poaching in Herring River con- trary to law, was cause of complaint thus early; and “on the question whether the town will remit to” (a prominent man) “ the penalty of the law for seining in the river, he paying the costs of suit as far as it has proceeded against him and Jim Mingo,” clemency prevailed.2 — The town petitioned the Gen. Court, June 18, to reduce the number of the courts of Gen. Ses. of the Peace and Inferior C. C. P. in this County, from four to two per annum. In 1754, Mar. 21, forty-two men were appointed by the town riages were solemnized by him as late as 1746, but none are recorded after. The 2d church seems to have become extinct about this time. 1 Mr. Silas Tupper, b. 1727, was the son of Sami. Esq. By marriage with Hannah Freeman, dr. of Wm., June 2, 1757, he had Anna Ap. 9, 1758, who m. Sami. Gifford; Sarah Ap. 1,1760 who m. John Fish; Samuel Mar. 22, 1762; Polly who m. Nathl. Aiken; Hannah who m. Elisha Free- man; and Silas Feb. 28, 1768. Mr. T. was long time the school-master, also Town Treasr. 1761-1766, and then, with all his family, married and unmarried, removed to Barnard, Vt., where he d. Mar. 28, 1801, se. 74. Aged people who passed away since our remembrance were accustomed to speak of him as “ School-master Tupper.” 2 The fine was remitted, enabling Mr.----and 11 negro Jim ” to congrat- ulate themselves that they were so well out of this fishy affair.104 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. “ to fire the woods before Ap. 16.”1 — Mr. Rowland Tupper d. May 12; whilst in the act of shaving his beard, he was struck by lightning.* In 1755, it was voted u to enlarge the meeting-house by dividing it in the centre and putting in 15 ft.; ” for which £ 60 was appro- priated.—Mr. Samuel Blackwell d. this year, Jan. 29.—The other incidents of the year are sufficiently noted in Yol. I. In 1756, the meeting-house being completed, the pews were ordered to be sold by auction. The pews having sold for more than sufficient to pay all expenses, leaving a considerable balance, it was “ ordered that a steeple be built; that the old bell be sold 1 It may appear strange at the present day that so late as 110 yrs. ago the practice of firing the woods prevailed; or even that it prevailed at all. How long after 1754 these firings were practised, we are unable to say. A fire in the woods at the present day is the signal of general alarm. But we must consider the changed condition of our forests. When the country was first settled, and long after, these forests were more passable than now. The trees were large and of primitive growth; then yielding the very best ship-timber and furnishing an abundant supply of lumber for all building purposes. There was, in consequence, very little underbrush, and the trees were not injured by the firings which were practised by the white man as had been the immemorial custom of the red men, to destroy, by the burning of the leaves and fallen branches, the lower limbs of these trees and the growth of noxious shrubs and other entanglements. These firings, by the settlers, were designed to encourage the growth of herbage for young cattle and sheep. —The former condition of the forests is illustrated by the travels of the company of men, women and children who left Newton (now Cambridge) to commence the first English settlement in Hartford, Ct., in 1635. They “ travelled through a trackless wilderness, having no Slide but their compass, and drove with them 160 head of cattle. Mrs. ooker was borne on a litter.” Persons on horseback could then ride con- veniently in any direction, except through swamps, thickets, and rivers. As Dr. Hildreth, of Ohio, in his description of the new lands at the West, says : “ While the red man possessed the country and annually set fire to the fallen leaves, the forests presented a noble and enchanting appearance. The eye roved with delight. Like the divisions of an immense temple, the for- ests were crowded with innumerable pillars, the branches of whose shafts interlocking, formed the arch work of support to that leafy roof which cov- ered and crowned the whole. But since the white man took possession, the annual fires have been checked, and the woodlands are now filled with shrubs and brush that obstruct the vision on eveiy side, and convert these once beautiful forests into a rude and tasteless wilderness.” 2 Roland Tupper, b. 1717, was uncle to the last named, being young- est son of Dea. Israel. See Yol. I. 698. He m. Zerviah Willis, dr. Sami, of Dartmouth, and had Willis Ap. 15, 1750; Lydia Mar. 22, 1752; and Eliza. Sept. 22, 1753, who m. Eph. Kempton of Dart, and d. a widow Nov. 29, 1848 «. 95. 3 We presume that the steeple was to surmount a porch at the W. end communicating as in after times with the W. aisle as did also another porch at the E. end with the E. aisle. Many are yet living who remember, as do we, ‘the old meeting-house* after its subsequent enlargement — the opera- tion having been similar to that indicated above, except that the division was in a transverse direction giving a greater distance from the front doorANNALS OF SANDWICH. 105 and a new one of 400 lbs. be obtained; that doors be put to tbe seats below; that tables be hung in the old men’s front seat, the women’s seats below to be hung with hinges; that curtains be placed at such of the windows as are exposed to the sun; that the seats in all the pews be hung and tables fixed in them where requested; that a place be provided for all free Negroes, Mulat- toes, and Indians, and that they be not allowed to sit below, or on the stairs.” A com. was app. “ to take the key and shut the door against disorderly persons until time of service.” Mordecai Ellis and Joshua Fish were app. “ to take care of the young people who are often very rude on the Lord’s days, and when any do offend return them to a Just. Pac. to be dealt with according to law.”1 As it may be of some interest at the present day, to know the arrangements of6 the meeting-house ’ more than one hundred years ago, we will give with some particularity what we find upon the records. (See pages 106 and 107.) In 1757, Mr. John Chipman d., Dec. 30. In 1758, Col. Cotton and the town rep. were app. “to answer the petition of Thos. Foster Esq. in behalf of the town of Plym., and to defend the rights of the town respecting Herring River.” — For schools, £33.6.8 was voted, “every scholar to pay addi- tional 4 d. per week.” In 1759, the legislature was again requested to reduce the four courts of Pleas and Sessions, to two terms annually which it was “ apprehended will be a great saving of time and charge and of great advantage to the inhabitants of the county.” — The town also passed an order “ to prevent damage to sheep by dogs.” 2 to the pulpit and greatly increasing the number of pews in the body of the house. By the latter arrangement the entrance stairs to the gallery were removed to the porches, and a somewhat different disposition of pews and seats both below and above was effected. The venerable old meeting-house, which for many yrs. accommodated the larger portion of the town on Sun- days, and was also the place in which were held all town-meetings for the transaction of public business, continued to be used until after doctrines conflicting with those of the fathers, began to divide the town into sects, and then gave way to an edifice of much diminished proportions—the Unitarian meeting-house which stands on the site. 1 In 1767, the petition of two misses “ to be relieved from a fine imposed for laughing in meeting,” was gallantly responded to by an affirmative vote. In later days, the process of administering^ justice to the boys was more summary; there was no opportunity for petition or repeal: a rap from the strong arm of ‘ old Titus ’ with cane in hand, came with singular surprise ofttimes to the shoulders or heads of the naughty and inattentive. 2 “ For keeping a blood-hound, or a dog in part blood-hound,” a fine of 18 s. was imposed, to be paid each and every week such dog is kept; and if vol. n. 14106 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. any inhabitant entertain persons who come from other towns to hunt with hounds, such inhabitant shall be fined 10 s. for each and every such offence; if any tavern-keeper entertain such and do not give notice to the town-treasurer within 12 hours after such hunters arrive, he shall pay a fine of 18 s. for each offence j and if any inhabitant hunt for deer between theGALLERY. ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 107 No. 9. £6.6.8. Mord. Ellis. No. 8. £6.13.4. Elijah Perry. No. 7. £4.1.4. f John Bourne. 1 •oisjy *sepraioj joj b;b3s 33jj * 23 E IS 3 £ i§«. ami £ eo a e* & fl c4 ^ S o 3| •83TBUIIOJ 8)838 33JCJ a Pi © a — rTT ! «2 ■s * & l ■d 's a >d 1 ► A ■S •d 8 W a SP 525 20th of May and the 1st of December, he shall pay a fine of 18 s. Any person killing a hound found hunting, and producing the head to one of the committee appointed to look after the deer, shall have 2 s. reward and the towrn will indemnify him. For information of any breach of this order, 2 s. reward.108 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. The next year, 1760, the last named Act was strengthened by “ an Act regulating hunting.”1 -In 1761, resort was had to voluntary contributions for the sup- port of the ministry. The town also voted “ that the ministerial lands at Nonsuch be bounded.” — The lands from which the Aca- dians had been driven out in N. Scotia, being now an object of interest, three families left town as part of an expedition to settle MatequiaJc, now Yarmouth. The pioneers were Seled Landers, Ebenezer Ellis, and Moses Perry, and they reached their point of destination, June 9. In 1762, an addition of £18.6.8 was made to the salary of Rev. Mr. Williams. — And the bounds between Plym. and this town were defined by Thos. Foster, Geo. Watson, and John Torry of Plym., and Sol. Foster and Jona. Bassett of this town.2 In 1763, “ the meeting-house com.” having reported that they had “ sold the old bell for the use of the court-house at Barnsta- ble,” it was “ ordered that the meeting-house be painted.” In 1764, two of the most influential and respectable citizens of this town, deceased: Sami. Jennings Esq., May 13, ae. 80; and Hon. Ezra Bourne in Sept., ae. 88. The discussions which had been frequent in public and private for several years touching the relation of the colonies to the parent government, were now assuming a prominent feature in all public affairs. The colonies were, as Burke remarked, “ snuffing tyranny in every tainted breeze.” Domestic manu- factures were here, as elsewhere, the more vigorously prosecuted from the produce of the fields and the product of the flocks. Flax and wool, then staples of 1 The necessity for these regulations was twofold: Below the towns of Plym. and Wareham and extending to Barnstable, Marshpee and Falmouth bounds, was a large district of country covered with wood because more valuable for its primitive productions than for any other, and this forest was the range, through a considerable portion of the year, of large flocks of sheep; moreover, this district with the woods of adjoining towns, embracing about 20 sq. miles, had always been well stocked with deer: but they were being rapidly thinned by hunters. Dr. Thacher relates that in 1730, a Plym. man “ killed 3 deer at one shot.” * “ Beginning at a white-oak bush on Peaked Cliff, marked on four sides, with stones about it; from thence running S. E. 3° to the westerly side of Herring Pond abt. 2 rods from the mouth of sd. pond to a rock; and from sd. rock to the Wareham line.”ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 109 New England, gave ample employment to the spinning wheel and loom which were found in every well-ordered family; wives and daughters priding themselves upon the fabrics which home industry had created. But for these circumstances, wealth would not have so rapidly increased, nor would the people have been so well pro- vided for the exigencies that might arise. The feeling now existing may be inferred from the prophecy this year of the younger Otis, “ The world is at the eve of the highest scene of earthly power and grandeur that has ever been displayed in the view of mankind.” In 1765, the war between England and France that had cost England 250,000 human lives, upwards of £111,000,000 sterling, and exhausted the treasury, being followed by a policy to relieve the nation of debt by a revenue to be increased by taxing the colo- nies, and the stamp-act being devised, the news was like a spark of fire among gunpowder. Whilst mobs and tumults were the result in cities,1 indignation and firm resolve were the result in the country towns.2 The revolutionary song has it, “ King George, he sent along his stamps, The people stamped with rage, Sir.” The repeal of the stamp-act in 1766, being preceded by a declaration of Parliament that the Crown had and “ of right ought to have power to bind the Colo- nies,” did not allay the excitement. 1 Oliver, the stamp officer, was assaulted in Boston, his office demolished, and he hung in effigy from the outstretched arm of a majestic elm long after known as * the liberty-tree/ Where stood this tree, at the corner of Essex and Washington Sts., the Hon. David Sears, the worthy President of the Cape Cod Association, caused to be erected buildings known as ‘ The Liberty-tree Block/ on the front of which in bass-relief is represented the tree. 2 The measure had caused Franklin, then in Eng., to exclaim, “ The sun of liberty is set; the Americans must light the torches of industry and economy ; ” to which Thomson, afterwards secretary of Congress, replied, “We shall light torches of quite another soft.”110 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1767, the town “ ordered that a powder-house he built,” and, Dec. 15, on “ the report of Col. Cotton, Sol. Foster, Stephen Nye, Nathl. Freeman,1 Sami. Wing, and Dea. Smith — a com. to con- sider a matter of great public interest,” the preamble and resolu- tions embraced by sd. report were twice read and adopted.2 At this period Mr. Elisha Tupper whose father and great-grandfather had long preceded him in the same work, was, as years previous, engaged in missionary efforts among the Indians; his ministrations being also attended by citizens of the town living contiguous to the several places where he officiated. His corre- spondence with the Commissioners for propagating the Gospel among the Indians, contains some valuable statistics not supplied from other sources.3 1 This is the first notice in the records of his connection with any pub- lic business. His deviating at all from strictly professional labors, was caused, as is seen, by the exigencies of the times. Deeply imbued with the spirit of liberty, he is henceforward prominent in political movements. 2 These were: — “ Whereas the use of foreign superfluities tends greatly to impoverish this Province and our town — as our money is daily going from us and the drain is likely to be increased by means not only of the late additional burdens from England, but the heavy tax which threatens the town with poverty and ruin unless all prudent measures be taken to lessen the use of superfluities from abroad, viz. loaf-sugar, cordage, anchors, men's and women's apparel ready made, household furniture, gloves, men's and women's shoes, sole-leather, sheathing, deck-nails, gold and silver but- tons, wrought plate of all sorts, snuff, mustard, clocks and watches, silver- smith and jeweller’s wares, broad-cloths costing more than 10 s. pr. yard, muffs, tippets, furs, and all sorts of millinery, starch, women and children’s stays, china-ware, silk and cotton velvets, gauze, pewterer's hollow-ware, linseed-oil, glue, lawns, cambrics, silks of all kinds, malt-liquor, cheese, bohea and green teas — the extravagant use of these last in the afternoon: Therefore resolved that after Jan. 1, 1768, we, in order to extricate us from our distressed circumstances and to prevent the importation of European commodities and superfluities the use of which threatens the town with poverty and ruin, promise and engage to and with each other that we will not import or introduce any of the above-mentioned restricted articles of foreign growth. And furthermore, to the end that this union be not violated, and the good effect to follow from it be not frustrated by any con- siderable inhabitant not signing and conforming to the regulations herein made as far and as well as he can; Therefore resolved that if any one disregarding the intentions of the town still continues to import or intro- duce any of the afore-mentioned articles, such person or persons shall be by us discountenanced in the most effectual but decent and lawful manner, though no force or restraint shall be laid upon them. Resolved, That the foregoing be lodged in the Town Clerk's office for signatures.” 3 A Memorial to the Comrs., Nov. 18, 1761, shows that the salary of the missionary was £183.6.8, old tenor.—At the present date, 1767, IsaacANNALS OF SANDWICH. Ill In 1768, 20th 2d mo., a petition was presented from the people called Quakers for their proportionate share of the ministerial lands. It was signed by Joshua Wing, Geo. Allen, Barnabas Hoxie, Gideon Hoxie, Sami. Gifford, John Allen, Edward Wing, Edward Dillingham, Josiah Gifford, Daniel Allen, Zaccheus Wing, and Samuel Wing. The petition was “ unanimously referred to a com. to confer with the petitioners and examine the foundation on which the town was settled; the manner and reasons of the grants of lands to the ministry; and whether the petitioners have any equitable right to the same, and report.” This com. consisted of Messrs. Sol. Foster,1 Benj. Fessenden, Prince Tupper, Jona. Bas- sett, Enoch Tupper, Thos. Barlow, and Dea. Smith. Political questions being again introduced by the proposal of the town of Boston for a Convention to be held there, the result in town meeting showed that the two political parties were, at this early period, nearly balanced. The vote was, after long debate, “ not to send to the Convention, 33 for, 42 against sending.” In 1769, it was “ voted that the school-master shall go through the town as heretofore, with his school, once a year.” — A passage for herrings “ into the pond that supplies Nye’s mill ” was ordered Jephry, Indian, proposed to relieve Mr. T. of part of his charge by preach- ing at Herring Pond for a salary of £6 ; a kindness that Jephry doubtless thought was not rightly appreciated. — Statements made at this date, rep- resent that besides Indians occupying 9 wigwams at Scorton, there were 8 families of Indians at Pocasset and as many houses—in all about 30 souls. There were also at Pocasset 50 Eng. families. — Mr. Tupper preached at the latter place, and “ also two miles from Mr. Williams’ meeting-house, in a meeting-house at Scusset formerly built by a party that separated from the Sandwich church 5 ” also “ once a month at H. Pond, and occasionally at Wareham.” 1 The name is upon the records first, at the time of the m. of Joseph Foster of Barnstable to Rachel Bassett of Sandwich Sept. 8, 1696, from whom were Mary Sept. 1, 1697 who m. Moses Swift Dec. 24,1719 ; Joseph Sept. 19, 1698; Benjamin Nov. 16,1699 who m. Maria Tobey Dec. 31, 1724; Wm. Mar. 31, 1702 ; Thankful Nov. 3, 1703 who m. Nathan Tobey Sept. 25, 1725; John Ap. 12, 1705 ; Nathan Jan. 3, 1707-8; Abigail Feb. 27, 1708-9 who m. Zaccheus Swift May 15, 1735; Deborah Jan. 18, 1710- 11 who m. Isaac Freeman Nov. 22, 1733 ; Ebenr. May 10, 1713 ; Solomon Sept. 4, 1714; Rachel Oct. 30, 1716; Hannah June 17, 1718 who m. Jona. Churchill of Plym. Dec. 10, 1743; and Sarah Sept. 23, 1721 who m. Nathl. Nye Nov. 11, 1742.— Solomon Esq., of the preceding family, was some time town-clerk, and much engaged in public affairs. By his m. with Rebecca Nye July 15, 1739, he had Bryant July 5, 1741; Abigail Dec. 30, 1750; Wm. Feb. 4, 1753; Elisha Oct. 14, 1759; and Lemuel Ap. 14, 1762.112 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. to be made. — “ Pocasset having again applied to be made a Pre- cinct, and a petition to this end being before the Gen. Ct.,” a com. was chosen by the town “ to remonstrate.”1 Capt. Thos. Bourne was app. for the town “ to oppose the petition in Gen. Ct.” In 1770, Mar. 8, the town voted that “ until the Act of Parlia- ment is repealed which now imposes duties on tea, paper, &c., we will not purchase any goods of those who import, nor of those who purchase from importers; and that if any person shall bring such goods into town, we will in a legal, just, fair, and prudent way discountenance and discourage the sale of such goods.”—A vol- untary payment of 14 s. was made by the ‘ Friends’ Meeting,’ to reimburse “ the charge the town had been at on account of a poor woman belonging to sd. Meeting.” 2 In 1772, during the month of June, the town was visited by "a terrible fire in the woods, which was attended with great destruction of sheep, and caused a great depreciation of property.” — Pocasset was incor- porated as “ the 2d Precinct in Sandwich.” — The town “ ordered that the Province law to prevent the destruction of oysters be put in execution.” — Samuel Tupper Esq., many years selectman and representative, d. Aug. 18.3 1 The remonstrants state “ that the total of Real est. in Pocasset is £1255 ; Personal £426.5 $ the ministerial tax £7.10.1 out of £70; that Mr. Tupper is employed by the Hon. Comrs. to preach to Indians 8 miles distant from Pocasset meeting-house ; that Mr. T. is not an ordained min- ister ; that there is no church gathered at Pocasset; that the number of dwelling-houses in that part of the town was but 18 in 1730, with 90 white inhabitants; in 1749, but 28 dwellings and 121 inhab.; and now, 1769, the number of dwellings is but 31, inhab. 160. Also that in the town are 60 families of Friends, or Quakers, whose rates are not available for the sup- port of the ministry. Furthermore, that the settlements in the town are all on the sea-shore, or around ponds, and many besides those residing in Pocasset are necessarily remote from meeting. Moreover, the small old meeting-house, removed, repaired, and set up in Pocasset, stands three miles from the nearest part of Manomet; the meeting-house at Herring Pond is gone to decay; Mr. Tupper is now about 63 yrs. of age, has but one Indian communicant, and that member 60 yrs. old; and that no other missionary will be appointed after Mr. T. who cannot long serve the con- gregation.” 2 The following is in a news-journal, Aug. 16: “A few weeks since sev- eral children were playing in Sandwich near the water, and one of them about 9 yrs. old, son of Rev. Mr. Williams, fell in and sunk. After about 15 minutes the child was taken out apparently dead, but by the usual applications was recovered.” * Samuel Tupper Esq. was son of Dea. Israel (see Vol. I. 698) and b. May 4,1692. He was a very prominent man, Rep. 7 yrs. and SelectmanANNALS OF SANDWICH. 113 In 1773, Jan. 26, a town meeting was called “the occasion for which being one of serious moment,” the Eev. Mr. Williams was waited on by “ a committee con- sisting of Moses Swift, Deacon Tobey, and Eliakim Tobey,” requesting him “ to attend before the meeting proceed further, and open the meeting with prayer.” This being done, a letter from the Boston committee was read, setting forth their grievances. The speech of the Governor to both Houses at the opening of the General Court, was offered, but refused a hearing. Sim- eon Dillingham, Moses Swift, Mordecai Ellis, Zaccheus Burge, Stephen Nye, Joseph Nye 3d, Simeon Fish, Seth Freeman, Nathaniel Fish Jr., Joshua Tobey, and Dr. Nathaniel Freeman, were appointed a committee to report suitable resolutions for the action of the meet- ing. Such resolutions were presented, adopted, and ordered to be forwarded to Boston: viz. 19 yrs. He m. 1st Rebecca Ellis, Aug. 15, 1717, and 2d Hannah Fish, Oct. 14, 1726, and had Mordecai Sept. 9, 1718, who settled in Barnstable; Sami. Feb. 20, 1719-20, who went to Dartmouth; Elizabeth Oct. 22, 1722, who m. Benj. Ellis Oct. 10, 1745; Rebecca Oct. 14, 1724, who m. Elkanah ' Morton of Dartmouth Dec. 12, 1752 ; Silas Aug. 9, 1727, who went to Yt.; Enoch Ap. 30, 1729; Peleg Ap. 1, 1731, who went to Maine; Jabez Jan. 27, 1733 ; Seth May 6, 1735, who went to Kingston; Rachel Ap. 9,1737, who m. Matthias Ellis Jr. Feb. 15,1759 ; Thankful Jan. 23,1740-1, who m. Nath. Phinney Jan. 13, 1763; Israel May 9, 1744, who went to Yt.; and Hannah May 26, 1746, who m. John Jones Mar. 10, 1765, and removed to Vt. — Enoch, son of the above, b. 1729, m. Mehitable Davis Sept. 15,1748, and had Desire, Solomon, Davis, Enoch, Olive, Seth, Olive, Jonathan May- hew, Mehitable, and Grace. — Peleg, b. 1731, m. Deborah Fish Jan. 24, 1765, and took with him to Maine a large family and had others bom there. He bought the first settler’s lot at Waterville, above the fort, on the Fair- field. road. — Jabez, b. 1733, m. Esther Jennings, Feb. 14, 1759, and was killed on board an Eng. frigate, being involuntarily detained to navigate. It is remarkable that the widow who lived to a great age, and had thus lost her husband by Br. impressment, was the daughter of Sam. Jennings Esq. whose suffering from nke impressment is mentioned p. 88. The family, we would suppose, could not have had a very favorable impression of the tender mercies of the British. The children of Jabez, were William Ap. 27, 1760, who by his cousin Olive Tupper had Diadama and d. 1784; Deborah July 5,1762, who d. single, very aged; Esther Oct. 31, 1764, who d. inf.; Jabez Sept. 10, 1767, who was lost at sea; and Esther Feb. 19, 1771, who m. and went to Maine. — Seth, b. 1735, went to Kingston, and there m. Priscilla Sampson Dec. 1, 1760, and had Sam., Peleg, Priscilla, Nath., Polly, and Bridget. He d. in the W. Indies in 1775. He has descendants still in K., and others widely scattered. VOL. H. 15114 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. “Resolved, That our rights as men, Christians, and subjects, are derived to the colonies in general and to this province in particu- lar, from the laws of Nature, the English Constitution, and the Provincial Charter, and that no power under Heaven has a right to deprive us of them. “ Resolved, That the infringement and violation of our rights are a matter of just complaint, that ought to be opposed in every lawful way by the whole body of the people as unconstitutional and intolerable grievances. “ Resolved, That our patience has been tried and new griev- ances come in the place of redress, until we are forced to believe the annihilation of our charter rights is intended. “ Resolved, That we owe it as a duty to ourselves, our fellow- men, and to posterity, to oppose in all lawful ways every such viola- tion of our rights, and that we will join with our brethren of the other towns in this province in any legal measures to obtain relief. “Resolved, That our representative be earnestly requested to exert his influence at the Great and Gen. Court to retrieve our injured rights, and secure those that yet remain, to us and to pos- terity ; and use his endeavors that a dutiful, loyal, but most impor- tunate petition be preferred to our Most Gracious Sovereign, fully and plainly presenting our grievances and earnestly imploring Royal interposition in our favor, assuring Him of our loyalty and the affection we bear to his royal person, crown, and dignity; that we are willing to continue our allegiance, but claim his royal pro- tection of us in the enjoyment of our charter and of our rights as Englishmen, and that our complaints are the general voice and not the murmurs of a faction as has been represented.” — These resolutions, Joseph Nye 3d, Dr. N. Freeman, and Benj. Blossom were directed to transmit to Boston. Mr. Blossom refusing to serve, Seth Freeman was chosen in his place. — At a subsequent meeting, letters received from the com. of correspondence in Bos- ton were read, and a com. of cor. was chosen in behalf of this town, viz. Dr. Nathaniel Freeman, Moses Swift, Seth Freeman, John Allen, Joseph Nye 3d, Geo. Allen, Simeon Fish, Mord. Ellis, Eli- sha Pope, John Percival, and Joshua Tobey. Thomas Smith Jr. and Stephen Chipman requested their dissent and protest against all the foregoing proceedings might be recorded; and the Messrs. Allen requested to be excused from serving on the aforesaid com., they being c Friends.’ At a meeting May 18, it was voted by the town “that our representative is instructed to endeavor toANNALS OP SANDWICH. 115 have an Act passed by the Court, to prevent the impor- tation of slaves into this county, and that all children that shall be born of such Africans as are now slaves among us shall, after such Act, be free at 21 yrs. of age. In 1774, Mar. 14, after prayer by Mr. Williams, the report of the town’s com. of cor. was read, embracing letters received and copies of letters sent. “ The doings of the com. were approved, and the thanks of the town voted for their zealous devotion to the true interests of the country.” It was also voted “ that the letters of the Gov. and Lt. Gov.,” and some others embraced in the report, “ are replete with malicious enmity.” Also, “ That the Act of Par- liament imposing a duty on Teas imported into America, is a tax upon us without our consent, and therefore unconstitutional and ought to be opposed; That the consignees of the tea sent by the E. Ind. Co. have discovered their enmity to the country by refus- ing to resign their agency, and have forfeited all right to our pro- tection ; That whereas the assemblage in the Old South Meeting- house in Boston in Dec. last did as far as was in their power and consistent with the good of the country, endeavor to have those teas go safely back and were obstructed in this endeavor by the obstinacy of others, the destruction of those teas became necessa- ry and wag wholly owing to the groundless objections of the con- signees and their aiders and abettors; That we will not import, buy, or make use of any teas purchased of the E. Ind. Co. or sub- ject to such unconstitutional duty, until the Act is totally re- pealed ; That an attested copy of these votes be transmitted, with the thanks of the town, to the corns, of cor. of Boston and Plym. for their manly opposition to a most pernicious measure, assuring them that we are ready to join them in opposing every unright- eous attempt upon our liberties.” — Zaccheus Burge, Lot Nye, and John Dillingham Jr. were appointed to supply the vacancies in the committee of correspondence occasioned by the resignations of Messrs. John and George Allen. That the inhabitants were here, as elsewhere to a considerable extent, divided by opposing political views, and that to the respective parties began now to be applied the distinctive appellations, whigs and tories, is a fact which, however sensitive any may be in refer- ence to it, it were ridiculous to ignore. It would be116 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. worse than ridiculous if an historian were to attempt to conceal the fact because, forsooth, some may object that the exposure is ‘ virtually exhuming the ashes of the dead.’ So far as is necessary to a full view of the dif Acuities attending the revolutionary struggle, we do not hesitate to state the case freely, fully, unequivo- cally. Such, here, as began now to be denominated by the odious epithet, were, perhaps generally, persons of influence. In some instances, leaders in the oppo- sition to patriotic measures had enjoyed emolument from the British Government. The influence of patr ronage, however limited the benefit, generally leaves its impression; a remark that need not he considered as apposite only to revolutionary times. Men of differ- ing parties have been found in later times as submis- sively fond of the crumbs falling from those in power as were any in the days of the favors of royalty. " Quid non mortalia pectora cogis, Auri sacra fames! ” As the excitement of the hour increased and the breach widened, various were the influences that decided the position of the masses. The whigs were soon in the ascendency, but the struggle was hard. The pa- triotic had much to contend against. Open, and also secret foes, were around their very dwellings. Stout must have been their hearts, to endure. Little know we of their dark and anxious hours; their sacrifices and trials. We would recall no angry resentments; we would rekindle no such passions from the embers of revolutionary strife: but we would be true to history. At a meeting, Sept. 30, after prayer by Mr. Ephraim Ellis, Dr. Nathaniel Freeman was called to the chair, the former moderator retiring on account of the business now before the meeting he having been app. to represent the town in the Glen. Ct. to be con- vened at Salem Oct. 5. Mr.Nye, the rep, was “instructed—notANNALS OP SANDWICH. 117 to consent to any business with the Council said to be appointed by Mandamus under the late Act of Parliament; not to conform in any manner to any of the late oppressive Acts by consenting to pay for the teas as required in the Boston Port bill; that he use his endeavors to obtain redress of our grievances, and that the constitutional council of the province chosen last May by the Gen. Ct. be called to unite with the court as usual.” He was also “ au- thorized to unitq with the Congress of the Province and act as a member of the same.” — The further report of the com. of cor. was then read, and patriotic resolves suited to the occasion were passed; viz.: u Resolved that this town approves the doings of its com. of cor., and that the letters recently received and now communi- cated, contain matter both interesting and alarming in regard to which we ought seriously to deliberate* determine, and act; That the Act called the Boston Port bill, is not only a most unrighteous violation of our charter rights, but is an unparalleled instance of cruelty, tyranny and oppression tending to alienate the affections and annihilate the prosperity of his majesty’s subjects, and there- fore ought by all means to be opposed; That the two other Acts, the one entitled c An Act for the better administration of Justice,’ and the other ‘ An Act for the better regulating the Govt, of the Prov. of Mass. Bay,’ are a daring insult upon the people, directly depriving them of the Eng. Constitution and violating the sacred Charter of the Province — calculated to prevent the impartial administration of justice and to encourage bloodshed and murder, and that should we tamely submit we cannot answer it to God, our own consciences, our fellow-men, or to posterity: therefore we never will submit, but will oppose sd. Acts even though it be at the risk of our fortunes and our lives; That as one means of obtaining redress without the carnage and desolation of civil war, we will neither import any goods whatever from Gt. Britain nor suffer any among us to import, nor purchase of any one who does import, until our grievances are fully redressed and the port of Boston is opened; That inasmuch as our brethren of Boston are suffering in a common cause and standing foremost in support of it, it is our duty to afford them relief and that subscription papers be opened and passed around through the town by the selectmen and com. of cor.—the amt. subscribed to be transmitted; That whereas the Capital of the Province is actually besieged by a fleet and army constantly making hostile preparations and often seizing upon and robbing the country of its means of defence, we deem it necessary for the people to be well-provided with arms and ammu-118 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. nition, and recommend that every male inhabitant of this town of 16 yrs. of age or over be provided accordingly and attend often to military exercise, the com. of cor. endeavoring to persuade the peo- ple thereto by calling upon them to assemble for the purpose, and the selectmen securing powder for the town — its full complement; That a Congress of Deputies for the several towns in the County appears to us necessary at this juncture, and that a com. for this town, consisting of Dr. Freeman, Messrs. Simepn Fish, Joshua Tobey, Lot Nye, Seth Freeman, Thos. Nye, John Dillingham Jr., Joseph Nye 3d, and Micah Blackwell, meet at such time and place as shall be agreed upon by the major part of the corns, that shall be chosen in the County; That every person use his best endeav- ors to suppress common pedlers of Eng., Scotch, or India goods, and the several innholders in this town be desired to refuse to entertain them; That the town clerk make a fair record of all let- ters received by the selectmen or com. of cor. from other towns, and of the letters they may send or have sent, together with the reports of the com. of cor. last March and at the present meeting, and publish the present doings; That the selectmen be directed to purchase a chest of arms and deliver them to the inhabitants at first cost at discretion, and four barrels of gunpowder with lead and flints in proportion, to be kept in addition to the town’s pres- ent stock; That the thanks of this town be expressed to the gent, from the counties of Plymouth and Bristol, who lately attended in this County to assist in preventing the late oppressive Acts of Parliament from taking effect,” (a com. consisting of Dr. Freeman, Seth Freeman, and John Dillingham Jr. being app. to that duty) — “ also thanks to Melatiah Bourne Esq. for the timber presented by him to be erected a liberty-pole.” A full account of the great gathering of 6 the Body of the People/ to which reference is made in the last resolve, appears under its appropriate date in the history of the county. At a legal meeting, Nov. 11, Dr. Freeman moderator, Mr. Wil- liams having opened the meeting with prayer further action was had that shows the town, by its majority, was still inflexible in its patriotic course. It was “Voted, That those mandamus coun- cillors and others who have accepted of, or acted under commis- sions or authority derived from the late Act of Parliament passed the last session for changing the form of govt., and who have not conformed to the resolves of the Prov. Congress of Oct. 21, be iANNALS OF SANDWICH. 119 stigmatized as infamous betrayers of their country and rebels against the state; the town-clerk to record their names as such.” — A second resolve expresses approbation of the doings of the Prov. Cong.; a third proposes “ the reorganization of the military companies of the town — the officers to be chosen by the mem- bers ; ” a fourth and fifth authorize the newly elected officers “ to demand the colors, halberts, drums, &c. in the name of the town of any persons in whose hands found, any further supply needed to be procured at the town’s expense, a competent person skilled in military exercise to be employed to instruct the companies and especially the minute company; ” a sixth threatens “ the resent- ment of the town upon any who refuse duty; ” a seventh designed “ to compel the payment of all moneys belonging to the Province in the hands of collectors or constables, to the Receiver General app. by the Prov.; ” and an eighth constituting Dr. Freeman, Jo- seph Xye 3d, Seth Freeman, Simeon Wing, and Simeon Fish, a com. to “ consider the recommendations of the Prov. and Continen- tal Congresses, and report at an adjourned meeting.” An appro- priation of £80 was made to enable the selectmen “to purchase military stores.” We need add nothing more in regard to the exciting scenes of the latter part of the present year; only let it be remembered that these were enacted when lib- erty was treason, and when the halter, not laurels, was the promised meed of patriotic daring. It is not unusual, even after the lapse of three fourths of a century, to hear it flippantly suggested that the measures adopted by ‘the sons of liberty’ were too stringent and savored of oppression. This, however, is said without duly considering the artful, determined, and malevolent course of the tories. It was natural that loyalists should be regarded with suspicion; for how could they sympathize with ‘the cause of their country ’ ? This, indeed they were not required to do; but they were expected to refrain from overt acts of sympathy with the Crown in opposition to ‘ the patriot cause.’ The question for the patriotic to decide, was, ‘ What is politic ? ’ It was necessary that the adherents120 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. to the Crown should be restrained. A different course could hardly have been expected by the loyalists them- selves. The policy was the same the loyalists would most assuredly have instituted had they the upper hand. If the only offence of the tories had been loyalty, we might all deplore their misfortunes. It may be said that they were generally honest in their views. But the whigs were equally honest; and their patriotism was reviled, and their lives were confidently expected by their opponents as the forfeit Self-pro- tection demanded the restraints they imposed. These restraints evoked resentment, hate, revenge; and prompt action and the utmost vigilance became indis- pensable. Mr. Sabine has stated that not less than 20,000 loyalists took up arms against the revolutionary struggle! In this town, for a time, parties were nearly balanced. We confess, we envy not the moral sense of the citizen who can at this day assert that his sympathies are with the loyalists of that eventful period. Of such, it may, doubtless generally, be said, “ Look, how the father’s face Lives in his issue.” In 1775, Feb. 1, at a town-meeting, Dr. Freeman moderator, a large com. was app. “ to see that the recommendation of the Con- gresses be carried into execution:” viz. Nathl. Freeman, Steph.Nye, Joseph]Nye 3d, Thomas Nye, Benj. Freeman, SilvanusNye, Joseph - Lawrence, Lot Nye, John Percival, Simeon Fish, Nathl. Fish) Simeon Wing, Jonathan Handy, Thos. Bourne Jr., Timothy Perry, Thos. Swift, Elisha Ellis, Benj. Fessenden, and Eliakim Tobey. — At a town-meeting, Ap. 24, Col. Nathl. Freeman1 being mod., “some fresh intelligence” was communicated “by Mr. Sampson,” whereupon it was “voted that a watch be app. for the sea-coast, and that watch-boxes be built at the several stations, and the watchmen be paid 2 s. per night.” — Col. Freeman and Stephen Nye were chosen to represent the town in the Prov. Congress 1 Dr. F. had this year been app. by the Council of the Province, Lt. CoL of the 1st regiment of the county.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 121 to be held at Watertown on the 30 inst. — A resolve similar to that passed by the Prov. Congress condemnatory of Gage, was subsequently passed by the town and entered on its records.1— It was also “ voted that 5000 bu. of corn be purchased by the selectmen at the town’s cost to supply those that need.” — The town assembled again, July 12, to appoint delegates to the Con- gress to be held at Watertown on the 19th; and Col. Freeman and Joseph Nye Jr. were chosen. In 1776, Mar. 12, Jesse Barlow had “leave to turn the country- road so as to accommodate the mill he proposes to build.” At a meeting, June 21, it was “ voted that should the Hon. Congress of the United Colonies declare these Colonies independent of the kingdom of Great Britain, We solemnly engage with our lives and our fortunes to support them in the measure.” It was voted, Aug. 9, that “ whereas sundry inhabitants advanced £30 lawful money to procure men to go to Boston or the fortresses adjacent, in the place of men required of this town* by the Coun- cil, this sum be refunded.” — And, Oct. 9, it was “voted to pros- ecute all who have neglected, or shall neglect to appear at military musters as required by law.” In 1777, May 2, it was “ ordered that Rev. Gideon Hawley and Mr. Elisha Tupper be repaid out of the treasury the sums they are respectively rated for lands in this town.” — At a meeting, June 30, it was first “ voted that Rev. Mr. Hawley, now in town, be waited on by Dea. Smith and Dea. Swift, and requested to open this meet- ing with prayer.” Mr. H. attended and performed the service, when the assemblage proceeded to business. A com. was chosen to prevent monopoly, &c. — Mr. Silas Tupper was continued teacher 1 “ Voted that a resolve of the following tenor having been passed by the Prov. Cong., viz.: ‘ WhereapCien. Gage since his arrival in this colony has conducted as the instrument in the hands of an arbitrary ministry to en- slave this people; and a detachment of troops under his command has been ordered by him to the town of Concord to destroy the public stores ; and by this clandestine and perfidious measure a number of respectable inhabitants of this colony have without any provocation by them given been illegally, wantonly, and inhumanly slaughtered by his troops: There- fore resolved that the sd. Gen. Gage has by these and many other means disqualified himself to serve this colony as its governor, and that no obedi- ence ought in future to be paid to his writs, proclamations, or any of his acts and doings, but that he ought to be regarded as an unnatural ^ and inveterate enemy to the country: * — this town do unanimously acquiesce in said resolve.” VOL. II. 16122 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. of the town school. — At a meeting, Nov. 11, the families of sol- diers in the country’s service from this town, requiring the public sympathy, Mr. Seth Freeman was app. w to supply them for the approaching winter.” — It was also “ voted that whereas there is a considerable sum of bills of this and other states, in the hands of the town treasurer, which bills it will be unlawful to offer in any* payments after Dec. 1, the treasurer endeavor to get the sd. money exchanged.” — The Confederation of the Colonies was approved.1 In 1778, the small-pox in town caused much alarm. A “ pest- house ” was provided, the roads near and around it were “ fenced- up,” nurses who had had the disease were provided, a “ red flag hung at the fencings,” all intrusion upon the grounds was prohib- ited, and even cats and dogs running at large were killed to pre- vent contagion. — Col. Freeman and Joseph Nye Esq. were cho- sen reps. May 22; after which election, Mr. Seth Freeman being mod., the Constitution or form of Govt, agreed upon by the Con- vention of the State Feb. 28, “was distinctly read, and debated, and finally approved,” ayes 86, noes 13, and the reps, were formally instructed to give their vote for the same. Other matters of grave interest, as was supposed, created the necessity of instructions extraordinary.2—It was “voted that 8s. per night be allowed 1 “ Whereas the Hon. Continental Congress have published Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union to be entered into by the States in America named ; and have recommended to the Gen. Assembly to invest its delegates with competent powers ultimately to subscribe in the name and behalf of the State such Articles of Confed. and Perpet. Union j and whereas the Hon. House of Representatives of this State regarding the matter of great importance, but beyond the usual course of business, have recommended to the several towns to instruct their Representatives to act and to do as their respective towns shall judge most for the advantage of this and the other States ; and sd. Articles having been now read again in town meeting: Voted that Joseph Nye Esq., our representative, be in- structed to assent to sd. Confed. as proposed by Congress, we of this town judging that it will be greatly to the advantage of this and the other United States of America that sd. Confederation be ratified.” 2 These instructions were as follows: “ To Col. N. F. and J. N. Esq., Reps, for the town of S. for the ensuing year : Gent., By making choice of you to represent this town in the Gen. Assembly, we have reposed great confidence in your attachment to the cause of the country, and in your abilities to serve it. We think it expedient nevertheless to mention some things by way of instruction. At a time when every insidious measure is being taken by the Br. ministry to divide us and to induce the continent to relinquish their independence, we are anxiously concerned lest our public councils be embarrassed by the admission of designing and inimical per- sons as members. The late election for the town of--has justly excited alarm. The choice of i a person who in every stage of the present con- test with Gt. Britain has appeared not only as an opposer of all Congresses,ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 123 each man employed by the military officers on the watch; and that Capt. Simeon Fish, Capt. Ward Swift, Lot Nye, Stephen Nye, and John Smith be a com. to procure the number of men required of this town for the continental army.”1 — It was voted, June 9, that “whereas sundry persons in this town have advanced £540 to hire 9 men to serve in lieu of 9 men detached from the militia of this town for 8 mo. in the State of Rhode Island, the sd. sum be raised by tax and refunded; ” and that “ whereas Gideon Rose who was a soldier in the Cont. army is reported dead, the agent for supplies of families of Cont. sol- diers, continue to supply the family of sd. Rose.” — Voted, Sept. 8, “ to raise £1500 to defray the town and county charges for the present year” — A proposal, Oct. 2, to raise £518.8 “to defray the expenses of schools,” failed — the interests of education being necessarily postponed to the crushing exactions of war. The necessity for a nightly watch on the coasts was imminent. The inhabitants were kept constantly on the qui vive, not alone by reason of the annoyances and depredations to which they were subject by an enemy whose presence on the surrounding waters was of daily observation; there was now reason to apprehend continental or colonial, and of American independence, and as the head and principal of the tory faction in this county, was a course of conduct that appears to us characteristic of very few towns in this state. The danger- ous plots against the state which have lately been discovered; the numbers among us that have joined the enemy; the unfriendly disposition of many in this county still among us; and the enemy’s ships frequently alarming our coasts ; are circumstances that forebode danger, and we would have you represent these matters to the Hon. Court, and the necessity of their point- ing out some speedy method for guarding against these evils.’ Further we think it our duty to instruct you to acquaint the Ho. of Reps, with the political character and conduct of------------, and to use your influence that neither he, or any other person of such dangerous political principles and conduct shall be vested with a power by which the state shall be injured, the House scandalized, and disaffection and jealousies excited. — We wish for no unreasonable exemption from the public levies of men or money; we wish to do our full proportion; but we think, considering the fact that we have raised our full quota for the Continental army, and as many more are now required of us, you should let the Court understand this matter, and that whilst we desire no more than credit for the men we have raised in a just proportion with other towns, we think it necessary as our men are much drained off by the land and sea service and the circumstances before related, that guards should be stationed in this county for our present security.” Voted, “nemine contradicente” 1 These repeated requisitions called into the service many of the town’s best men. At this time, among the volunteers, were William Handy, John Freeman, William Bodfish, and William Nye.124 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. some grand demonstration verifying rumors, and ful- filling the threatening taunts of the tory faction.1 — Roland Cotton, Esq., died May 16.2 In 1779, the tory faction was not only subdued; many of them had abandoned the town. The course of the whigs had been resolute, and for a time not unattended with danger—for their opposing towns- men were maddened, and determinedly vindictive as long as there was hope. Such as remained in town, had now become gentle as lambs;3 numbers absent were meekly suppliant4 Among the arrested, impris- 1 Such demonstration was intended when the Br. fleet left its position off N. London, Sept. 4, commencing operations next day at N. Bedford and Fairhaven, and on the 10th at Falmouth. We are sorry to record as illustrative of the spirit which actuated the tories, that some of their num- ber acted as guides to the enemy on these occasions. 2 Mr. Cotton, s. of Bev. Boland C., was a grad. H. C. 1719. He resided in Woburn many yrs., and was Bep. of that town ; was also Clk. of the Ho. of Bep. 1739-1753, and from 1759 to 1765 being succeeded in 1766 by Sami. Adams. Beturning to Sandwich, he was here elected Bep. in 1753 and other years. Whether he postponed marriage till late in life, we know not. All that we do know of his family is from the Bost. Gaz. Oct. 20, 1760: “ On Friday the 3d inst. Boland Cotton Esq., Bep. for the t. of S. and Clk. of the Hon. Ho. of Beps., was m. to Miss Deborah Mason of this town, a very agreeable young lady and endowed with all those virtues and accomplishments requisite to make the marriage state agreeable and happy.” 3 Still, the old affront was long festering; and it maybe a question whether its virus did not affect generations of descendants then unborn. Suffice to say, among the posterity of these men have been leading men of divers political parties. The descendants of refugees are to this day numerous in the Br. Provinces. Some who joined the royal forces in Bhode Island, took refuge in Long Island and other parts; and some returned by permission. 4 It would occupy too much space to do more than refer to two or three instances, as a sample of many : “ A letter directed, from the 4 prison-ship ’ in Boston, to Col. Freeman, was communicated to the town, Mar. 11, and in town-meeting it was “ voted that the town consent to the applicant, Capt. ----------, coming home, as he requests, on parole to visit nis family and settle his affairs, under such limitations as the Gen. Ct. or Council shall direct.” — An “ address ” to the town signed by----------, was also read, and referred to the same com. that had charge of the former case; viz.: Col. Freeman, Joseph Nye Esq., Lot Nye, Malachi Ellis, John Smith, Silv. Jones, and Dr. Smith; who reported * that the case of the applicant is peculiarly embarrassing through his own previous misconduct, but demands pity; that if his present professions are the real sentiments of his heart and his sincere resolution, he should be permitted to obtain a pardon and return to his family and estate — provided all be done at such time and under such circumstances as are consistent with the public safety and theANNALS OF SANDWICH. 125 oned, proscribed, or banished, were not a few belonging to this town, whose names need not be repeated. The record of them is not essential to a faithful exhibit of the perils of the period. It was voted, May 19, that £1000 be hired to meet the town’s expenses. — On the petition of Seth Hall, a soldier of the Cont. army, it was ordered that his family be supplied. — The following action was had, July 5: “ Whereas the town is called upon to raise 12 men by draft, lot, or voluntary enlistment to re-inforce the Cont. army for 9 mos.; in which requisition the people called Quakers are included, whose proportion is at least 3 of the 12 • and as one or more persons of this town has lately enlisted — reducing the number the town ought in equity to raise; Voted that 8 men be raised, and that the town will advance to them such encouragement as is proper.” Also “Voted that the town will in- demnify the militia officers for any fine to which they may be lia- ble for not drafting 12 men.” — Also, “Whereas the town is called upon to furnish 4 men to serve in the State of R, Island, and one person belonging here has already enlisted, Voted that 3 men be raised for that service.” And “Voted that if the requisite number of men to answer the call of June 8 and 9th are not obtained by voluntary enlistment within one week, the captains of the military shall proceed agreeably with the resolve of court.” Also “Voted that this town will, to provide against inequalities of remuneration and encourage enlistment, make just compensation for all such past services—having regard to time, nature of service, and the value of money at the time of payment; ” and that Col. Freeman and others “ adjust this matter and report.”—The requisition for shoes and stockings for the army was also referred. A petition from Jas. Warren Esq. in behalf of the inhab. of Plym. presented to the Gen. Ct., praying that sd. town may have the right of taking herrings in the river running through this town, or otherwise have liberty to take sd. fish in seines from the pond, having been read together with a citation to this town to show cause; it was “voted that Col. Freeman, Stephen NTye, Benj. Fessenden, Maj. Bourne, and Seth Freeman Esq. be a com. to answer sd. petition; and that Col. Freeman be agent for the town, to defend its right in Gen. Ct.” general good; and that our reps, be instructed to lend the applicant their assistance.’ “ Adopted nem. con.”126 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Mr. Lot Nye was chosen delegate to the Convention for form- ing anew Constitution.1 — The sum of £2550 advanced by the com. for the quota of soldiers required of the town, was allowed; as also the expenses of the com. £150. — The Convention at Con- cord having recommended a tariff of prices, it was “ voted that Seth Freeman Esq., Stephen Nye, Thos. Burge, John Perry, Jona. Handy, Capt. Simeon Fish, John Ewer, Peleg Nye, and Silv. Jones be a com. to state the prices of labor &c. according to the 5th resolve of the aforesaid Conv. of July 14; and that the regu- lations be posted in the public houses.” A com. was also app. “ to publish the names of all persons violating sd. regulations, that the offenders may be dealt with.” 2 In 1780, Mar. 8, the town voted “ to petition for reimbursement of expenses in support of the Indian poor.” — “That Indians, na- tives, be allowed 2 bis. of herring to each family.” —And, May 12, that Rev. Mr. Williams, Lot Nye, Dr. Thos. Smith, Col. Freeman, 1 The proceedings generally, of this meeting, were reconsidered, for causes unknown. — We find also on record the following: “The proceedings of the Convention held at Concord, July 14, being read, it was “ voted that this town do approve of and adopt the result of sd. convention.” In reference either to the object of this convention, or the expediency of being repre- sented in it, when proposed, there seems by the record to have been some difference of opinion; but at a late day, it was ordered “ That the select- men inform the Prest. of the convention held at Concord, that this town approves of the doings of that conv., and would have been represented had it not been for the present deplorable situation of the town in regard to the enemy, having been obliged to march for the defence of Ealm. on alarm, and being in constant expectation of being again called upon.” 2 The schedule of prices fixed was as follows: Ind. corn, pr. bu., £4.00.00. Bye, “ “ 5. 2. Wheat, “ “ 8. Beef, pr. lb., . 4. Mutton, “ . 4. Cheese, “ . 6. Butter, “ .12. N. E. Rum, pr. gal., 4.18. do. pr. gill, . 6. Grog, pr. mug, .16. Oak wood, pr. cord, 8. 2. Raw hides, pr. lb., . 4. Sole leather, 1.10. Men’s shoes, pr. pair, 6.12. One axe, 7.10. Eng. hay, pr. ton, 32. Salt hay, “ “ 16. Oats, pr. bu., 2. do. pr. pottle, . 5. Potatoes, pr. bu., 1. 6. 8. Turnips, “ “ 1. 8. Salt, 7. • B. Sugar, pr. lb., £0.14. Molasses, pr. gal., 4. 9. Coffee, pr. lb., .18. 3. Bohea Tea, “ 6. Chocolate, “ 1. 4. 6. Flax, “ .15. Wool, “ 1. 7. Common labor, pr. d., 2. Mowing, pr. d., 3. Carpenter-work, pr. d., 3. Mason’s-work “ “ 3. Team : 1 ton, pr. mile, 1. 1. Shoeing horses, around, 3.12. Horse-hire, pr. mile, . 4. Horse-keeping, grass, pr. d., .12. do. hay, “ “ .18. Boards, wh. pine, per M., 43. Shingles, “ “ 14. Inns: Dinner, .15. “ Supper, .13. “ Breakfast, .13.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 127 Micah Blackwell, Simeon Wing, and Thos. Bourne Esq. be a com. “ to take under consideration the Constitution agreed upon by the delegates of the people and transmitted to the towns for their acceptance.” The requisition now being for 24 men additional from this town for pub. service, it was voted, June 20, that the town will comply; and the militia officers in conjunction with Col. Freeman, Messrs. Micah Blackwell, Stephen Nye, and John Smith were app. “ to pro- cure the men on the best terms possible.” At the same time “ a petition to the Hon. Council and Ho. Reps, of the State of Mass. Bay,” was adopted, the object of which was to secure equality through the country in the burden of providing soldiers.1 At a meeting, June 24, it was “ voted that the 24 men required of this town under the new levy of June 5, be paid not exceeding $20 in silver pr. month; and that in case men cannot be procured at that rate, the town will indemnify the officers and pay the fines incurred.” Also, “ that the com. be directed to apply to such of * the Meeting of Friends ’ as are thought to have money to spare, for a loan in case fines are imposed; and that in case they refuse they shall be liable to be drafted.”2 The requisitions were now frequent, and beyond the ability of the town to answer promptly. Another was made June 23 for 29 1 “ The petition &c. humbly sheweth: That the inhah. of the town of S. have ever complied with the requisitions of the Gen. Ct. for the raising of men and with as much alacrity as possible, and trust they have hitherto answered the expectations of the Court: But they beg leave to represent that they think themselves injured by being obliged to pay a part of the fines of such towns as are deficient, having neglected or refused to comply as this town hath done. Such is the case: some of the inhabitants of tnis town who, though they cannot vote or have any influence in the town of Barnstable, are liable to have their lands which lie within the limits of Barnstable, taxed to pay a part of the fines imposed justly upon sd. town for neglect to procure its quota. . . . The fault is not in any inhab- itant of this town ; and we think they only who are guilty should be fined. . . . Required in June to raise 16 men, they raised but 6 ; in conse- quence of which that town has been fined £ 6000, and unless the Gen. Ct. interposes, some of the inhab. of this town of S. who have already paid their full proportion of our quota, must pay a part of the fine thus incurred and the expenses of the two agents. ... We therefore humbly re- quest . . . that the towns that comply may not have cause to com- plain that they fare worse than do those towns which do not procure their men,” . . . &c. 2 These were trying times ; and if the Friends, who had throughout the war enjoyed immunity from liability of being called to bear arms in defer- ence to their conscientious scruples, and whose coffers were all this time replenished whilst their neighbors had borne the heat and burden of the day, had the abundant ability to help the town by a loan in this time of need and extraordinary sacrifice j we presume the above vote will not be considered as highly censurable.128 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. men, and yet another a few days after for 6 men. The town assembled and “ voted to raise them, and assess the expenses as required for the 24 men demanded on the 5th of June.” It was further “ voted that if the men cannot be procured for the wages offered by the town in addition to the wages paid by the State, the town will submit to be fined.” — Again, Dec. 2, a requisition for 22 men for 3 yrs., or during the war, was made; as also for clothing and shoes; and, Dec. 18, the town after due considera- tion, “voted to obtain a loan of £660 lawful money in silver or gold for the purpose of complying with the call.” —Mr. Timothy Bourne d. Oct. 5, ae. 77.1 In 1781, July 6, the town, to comply with the requisition of June 16, voted $13 pr. mo. to each soldier to be raised, in addition to government pay; and July 17 it was reported by the com. that they had “ procured the 4 men to serve in Rhode Island,” but had been obliged to promise “$20 pr. mo. to each, to be paid in sil- ver.”— A call for 18 men for the Cont. army June 30, was, by cause of some oversight in the State authorities, not communi- cated until Sept. 5, when all the men capable of bearing arms were employed in the defence of the coast. A com. was immediately app. “ to represent to the Gen. Ct. the situation of the town, but in the mean while to see what can be done.” — It was voted, Nov. 2, “ that 4 d. pr. lb., silver, be paid for beef to answer the requisition of the Court for 21,353 lbs.” It was found utterly impracticable to procure the beef on any terms. A part was finally procured and offered; but the agent of the Superintendent of supplies, Jona. Howes, refused to receive any unless the whole quota was forthcoming. He also refused the money tendered as a substitute. In 1782, Jan. 11, the town’s rep. was instructed to use his utmost endeavors “ to secure a strong appeal from the Gen. Ct. to Con- gress for positive instructions to be given to Commissioners for negotiating a peace, to insist on the right of the TJ. States to the fisheries as an indispensable article of any treaty that may be made.” — The town felt it incumbent to memorialize the Gen. Ct., setting forth the difficulties in the way of procuring the required 1 Mr. Bourne’s line of descent was from Mr. Richard, through Job who d. 1677, Dea. Timothy b. Ap. 18,1666, who m. Temperance Swift, and had Job, Benjamin, Joanna, Mehitable, and last Timothy Dec. 5, 1703. By his m. with Elizabeth Bourne, he had Benjamin Jan. 25,1744, who grad. H. C. 1764; and Sheaijashub Mar. 10, 1746.—Doct. Benjamin, the grad- uate of 1764, by his m. with Hannah Bodfish had a large family, the 7th being Benj. Esq. June 1, 1784, still surviving, who also has a large family. Doct. B. was learned, somewhat eccentric, and a noted citizen living to old age, and a man of large landed estate.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 129 quantities of beef for the Cont. army.1— It was voted, Jan 31, that “ the selectmen be directed to apply to the Gen. Ct. for the wages due the 3 months’ men of this town that are on the roll of Capt. Matthias Tobey, which wages belong to the town — the town having paid the men.” — Also “ that the assessors be a com. to use their best endeavors to procure one or more constables on as rea- sonable terms as possible.” 2 — It was voted, Mar. 14, that Brigadier Freeman, Stephen Nye, Joseph JSTye Esq., and Dr. Smith be a com. 1 It was stated, in substance, ‘ that process, it was understood, was about to be issued by the Superintendent of supplies of beef, against the town treas., and money does not suffice to stay the execution: they are con- strained, therefore, candidly to submit the facts in the case; that this town is one of the places that by reason of its peculiar situation and suspension of business, greatly suffers. We would not dwell upon the difficulties, losses, and burdens we are called to encounter ; but we think the poverty of our lands in general, the removal of great numbers of inhabitants, the loss of the fisheries in which 180 men of this town were employed and which was emphatically the source on which they depended for even the means to pay taxes as well as to procure the necessaries of life never here produced in sufficient quantities for the supply of the inhabitants ; together with the fact that we have never been able to substitute other branches of business to compensate the loss, should be considered by a govt, whose justice and good policy is to afford relief rather than to oppress. Our small stocks are exhausted; and yet, without the means of obtaining money for urgent necessities, we have been fully impressed with the importance of the cause in which our country is engaged, and have ever looked forward with desire to the happy day when it shall enjoy peace, safety, and an unin- terrupted commerce, and have struggled hard to comply with every requi- sition of govt. Soldiers have been procured by our giving securities for enormous sums. — As it was known to be impracticable to supply the beef required unless it could be purchased elsewhere, a tax was ordered for the whole sum with a view of either procuring it, or paying the amount in money to the superintendent; but such has been the pressing demand upon the constables for other taxes, they have been able to collect but a small portion. About £4000 of the old emission was sent, but refused, though received from govt.; and £ 7000 obtained on the credit of the town, the agent also refused unless he could have the whole, and this it was not in our power to obtain. Our stocks which with our houses and lands, are the last resort, were exposed at auction, but few or no bidders appeared, Your petitioners pray that the sum of £ 3882 received from govt, in pay for mile- age, clothing &c. may now be received back into the treasury at the same rate at which it was received from the treasury, viz.: 75 for 1; that such abatements be made as we are entitled to under the last valuation; that such sums as are due from govt, for the wages of 6 and 3 months* men may be deducted from the gross amt. of our beef-taxes ; and that the sd. execution may be stayed until further order from the Gen. Ct.: without which we apprehend that many inhabitants will be driven to despair, and those exertions discouraged winch they would yet continue to make.* * As on this officer devolved the duty of collecting taxes, it was exceed- ingly difficult to get any one to serve. Taxes had been so often assessed, and so onerous were they, that they could not, in many instances, be col- lected without occasioning distress. Hence the premium that must now be offered for some shape of a man void of sensibility. VOL. II. 17130 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. in conjunction with the selectmen “ to wait on the Commission- ers app. by the Gen. Ct. to come into this county to view it; ” and that sd. com. make such representations as shall be proper. The representative was directed, Mar. 29, “ to endeavor to pro- cure a law to prevent the destruction of hen-fish, alias peqhaugs, in the bays and rivers — a law similar to that of 1765 for the pro- tection of oysters.” — Action was also had to secure the enforce- ment of existing laws for the preservation of shell-fish, “ against interlopers from abroad.” — Persons were app. “to take every legal method to prevent the estate now improved by widow —— from being confiscated.”1 There were at this time numerous applications for permission to refugees to visit their families yet remaining here ;2 3 * — requests which could not be granted in extenso for reasons that are obvious.5 In 1783, Jan. 13, the rep. of the town was instructed not to give his consent “ to half-pay being allowed officers dismissed from the army.” — A correspondence was instituted, Feb. 3, with the several towns in the county, proposing the choice of delegates at the annual March-meetings, to assemble at the court-house in 1 Her husband had d. abroad, a refugee. Other and similar instances induced the appointing of a com., the next year, “ to take into considera- tion generally the subject of the estates of absentees,” whose families might otherwise suffer. The circumstances of two widows are especially mentioned: their husbands had died in the enemy’s service; then estates were confiscate ; and the com. were directed to make such representations to the court as might effect the postponement of further action, and restore their families to the full possession of the property. 2 There certainly was exhibited a commendable disposition to extend indulgence as far as was compatible with the public interests. The follow- ing record appears, Oct. 28 : “ Whereas it is represented that there are a number of persons that went from this town to Long Island, who have manifested a desire to visit their relations here, Resolved that the authority of the Govt, be solicited to grant permission to A. wife of B. C., D. the wife of E. F., G. the wife of H. I., J. the wife of K. L., M. the wife of N. O., and P. Q. with such of their children as are under 15 yrs. of age, and also to the children of R. S., to come to this town under a flag of truce, to visit their Mends, subject to such restrictions as may not be incompatible with the public safety. Voted, nem. con”—The alphabetical designations, we need not perhaps say, are not initial distinctions. 3 The whigs and the country had full employment without granting indulgences that might lead to extensive concert of action on the part of the disaffected, and constant communications with the enemy. The people seem to have been well disposed to toleration ; but if any think otherwise, they must also admit that the tone's had been quite as intolerant and belli- gerent. Those located in the Br. Provinces seem to have retained unfriendly feelings towards the patriotic for a long time. As late as May 24, 1786, the Boston Centinel records, “ The refugees in Nova Scotia continue to exercise their cowardly malice on every person who may come that took part with the U. States during the war.”• ANNALS OP SANDWICH. 131 Barnstable “ to represent to the Gen. Ct. the distressed condition of the county at large, or of such towns as may agree to this pro- cedure.” And, Mar. 5, Maj. Bourne, Stephen Nye, John Smith, Melatiah Bourne Esq., Capt. Moses Allen, Joseph Nye Esq., and Dr. Thos. Smith were app. on the part of this town “to attend the proposed convention on the last Tues. of the month.” It was also “ voted that the delegates to sd. conv. use their endeavors to have the inferior courts reduced to two per annum.” Certain inhab. of Plym. having petitioned to be annexed to this town, the town’s consent was given. And, Mar. 12, “the consta- bles were ordered to exert themselves to collect money enough to satisfy the execution against the town, and were instructed, if they must distress, to begin with those that are assessed highest.”1 The return of the blessings of peace, we have already noticed, perhaps sufficiently for the brevity of local history, in Yol. I. But we may be pardoned for a few additional remarks. The success of the American Revolution was the triumph of reason and of right; of reason, for the public mind had long been familiar with the topics of controversy, the revolution being, in fact, in preparation long before the first blow was struck; of right, for the people wished only to defend their rights — there was no desire to plunder or spoil — there were no resentments to be appeased only by death or misery. The Colonies had long been treated by the parent State with neglect, harshness, and injus- tice ; and the people had not read without profit of Pharaoh and his discomfiture. Master spirits having invoked discussion and inquiry, the effect was gradual and sure. The influence upon the masses, was acknowl- edged by the readiness with which the many received counsel from the lips of those ardent sons of liberty. Had there been no master spirits, the cause would, 1 The necessity for this was greatly modified, if not entirely abrogated by a special resolve of the Gen. Ct., Oct. 9, by which the loyal portion of the community whose negative action in fiirnishing soldiers or pecuniary means for the prosecution of the war was required to supply past deficiencies. The requisition, no doubt, appeared to such persons severe ; but who will say it was not just P132 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. indeed, have been hopeless. But the distinction had begun early to be understood, between charters which guarantee sacred rights, and charters which serve only as a ligament between colonies and the king. The people clearly saw relations existing for which no royal charters could provide. They were no more to be sat- isfied with grants of right from tyranny; they were determined to receive their freedom no more as a gift from sovereignty: they chimed it as theirs of right. Thanks to an overruling Providence and to patriotic leaders, the people had risen above all delusions fostered hitherto by monarchists and despots. The goodness of God should ever be gratefully confessed, who gave in times of difficulty and danger, men of virtue and noble daring to the counsels of the country. Some may u decline so low from virtue ” as, at the present day, to be incapable of discerning its beauty, or of aspiring to its delights; but there are few, probably, from whom the impress of Deity is so wholly effaced. What, had the patriots failed! What, had their stout words fallen on faithless ears! What, had their votes and resolves ended in mere bravado! The leading spirits would not only have been doubly despised — the scorn of deluded followers, and the butt of their enemies’ derision; but military despotism would have ensued and perpetuated its oppressive reign! We would not inordinately herald their praise; we would not by any poor words of ours assay to vindicate their merit—the attempt would be preposterous as " with taper-light To seek the beauteous eye of Heaven to gamish.,, They were not aspirants for place; but they would have the people free. They were not invaders; theyANNALS OF SANDWICH. 133 were defenders of the right. They sought not their own aggrandizement; they were intent, regardless of peril or sacrifice, on vindicating to these Colonies a place among the nations of the earth. Fearful, they well knew, were the odds on the part of the oppressor; but a sling and a stone had once conquered, and their confidence was in ‘ the God of armies.’ Nor was the influence, as is too generally taught, chiefly from the cities or larger towns; the sons of lib- erty were found widely scattered. It has been well remarked that a country thinly peopled, but salubrious — its scenery grand, but retired from the bustle of tempting impulses, is most favorable to development physical and moral The revolution found the people in the smaller towns, if not in advance of the age, fully up with it; and in these towns were the strength and vigor to sustain it “ Unpaid, unclothed, unfed, tracked in the snows with the blood of their footsteps, they turned not their faces to their country with resent- ment, nor from their enemies in fear.” With all its disadvantages of position and the encouragement with which these disadvantages inspired the unhappy men who clung to royalty, this town performed its full share of the work. We claim no more: but this we may unhesitatingly assert. Mr. Ephraim Ellis died this year, June 4, aged 67;1 and Mr. Benjamin Fessenden, Oct. 24, aged 55. In 1784, Aug. 8, the Eev. Abraham Williams, whose pastorate, eminently peaceful and successful, had ex- tended through a long course of years, died aged 58.2 1 Mr. Ephbaim Ellis was emphatically a good man. He was prob. without ordination; but was much employed in preaching to the Indians. Descended from Lt. John, by Matthias Sr., and Malachi who m. Jane Blackwell Jan. 3, 1715-16, he was father of Malachi b. Mar. 6, 1738-9, who m. Susanna Dennis of Rochester Nov. 7, 1759, and who was a soldier of the revolution; and of Nat hi. who removed to Barnard, Vt. * For notice of Mr. Williams, see Yol. L 565. We may not omit to134 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Elisha Bourne had liberty granted him to erect a dam across Herring River under certain restrictions. Of 1785, nothing remarkable is recorded. “Scragged Neck” was the subject of dispute between the 1st or ancient parish, and the Pocasset parish or 2d precinct. This controversy was of sev- eral years’ continuance. — It was voted, May 12, that Gen. Free- man, Maj. Bourne, Joseph Nye Esq., Stephen Nye, and Seth Freeman Esq., be a com. “ to represent to the Gen. Ct. the pecu- niary embarrassment of the town,” growing out of the late war. In 1786, Mar. 8, a com. was chosen “to procure a grammar school-master; ” and Ap. 3, another “ to consider the application of the 2d Precinct for a part of the ministerial lands, and to report whether the town can consent to act with said precinct in the set- tlement of a minister; ” and also, May 10, another “ to receive the continental money belonging to the town, and also that held by individuals,” with a view of effecting an exchange. — Mr. John Smith Jr. died this year Jan. 10, as. 55. In 1787, April 18, the Rev. Jonathan Burr having been called to the pastoral charge as successor of Mr. Williams, was ordained. — The representative election resulting in the choice of Messrs. Thomas Bourne and Thomas Smith, was the subject of protest;* and the mention a worthy and Christian man, one of two slaves that Rev. Mr. Wil- liams brought with him to Sandwich — a man and woman—Titus Win- chester. On his monument is written, 44 His fidelity to his earthly master was only equalled by that which he constantly displayed to his Heavenly.” After the decease of Mr. Williams, Titus followed the seas as steward for some years, and by industry and economy acquired considerable property which afforded him comfortable support in honored old age. The balance of his property, he bequeathed to the parish, and from the interest of the bequest the town clock was purchased. A writer in the Sandwich 4 Cape Cod Advocate/ says, 44 While the memorial of Titus which will not decay we may believe is in Heaven, so long as yonder clock shall tick we shall have a memento of slavery and piety, freedom and benevolence, in the history of an African who would not accept liberty during the life of the faithful master and pastor by whom he was probably led to Christ.” 1 A protest was entered against the legality of the proceeding 44 for the reasons that the meeting was not properly warned; that those who presided were not constitutionally chosen; that persons not qualified by law wrere allowed to vote, the Act of Wm. and Mary being the criterion for deter- mining who were legal voters which Act is null and void, instead of the Act of the Gen. Ct. passed Mar. 23, 1786, thus admitting persons to vote who had not taken the oath of allegiance as also inhabitants of the District of Marshpee ; that the constable who warned the meeting was not qualified, not having taken the oath of allegiance; that the presiding officer, one of the candidates for rep., unreasonably and arbitrarily refused to put a motion to divide; that legal voters were refused •, that the meeting vras conductedANNALS OF SANDWICH. 135 representatives were instructed.1—Messrs. Thomas Smith and Thomas Nye were chosen, Dec. 11, “ delegates to the Convention to be holden in Boston in Jan. next.” — Mr. Elisha Tupper, the missionary, died this year at Pocasset, aged about 80. In 1788, the question of the adoption of a new Con- stitution, or Form of Government for the United States, was decided in the negative, noes 73, ayes 3.2 in an unfair and unusual manner, the moderator saying, ‘ I will determine votes as I please, and not as the objectors please ; ’ and that the town not having so many as 375 ratable polls is entitled to but one representative. Moreover, had the town been permitted to act legally, a different person from either of the two said to be elected, would have been the choice of the town.” Signed by Seth Freeman, Lemuel Pope* John Percival, Stephen Nye, Sami. Fessenden, Jas. Freeman, Joseph Nye, Nathan Nye Jr., Zenas Nye, Ab. Williams, Sami. Ellis, James Faunce, Elisha Pope, Beni. Tobey, Paul Gifford, Heman Tobey, Nathl. Bassett, John Pope, Cornelius Tobey, John Tobey, Moses Allen. Melatiah Tobey, Sami. Freeman, 1 These instructions were: “ To endeavor to have the Gen. Ct. removed out of Boston; to have the Constitution revised; to purge the house of all unconstitutional members; to endeavor to prevent the effusion of blood, by causing peace and good order to be established in the State ; to have salaries reduced; to reduce all public securities to the price actually given for them ; to have State securities liable to taxation as others are; to have large duties laid on all luxuries; to have clergymen taxed as others are; to have the act suspending the privilege of ‘ habeas corpus ’ repealed; to secure an act for the better regulating the business of the country ; to have the mode of taxing better regulated; to prevent all grants to the col- lege, and unreasonable grants to any man or body of men; and to secure an Act to prevent the destruction of shell-fish in Buzzard’s Bay.” 2 The Confederation under which these States achieved their independ- ence, was a league of sovereign states, but not the sovereign. It had power to contract debts and to pledge the public faith; but it had no power to levy taxes or impose duties for the redemption of the pledge. Its man- dates had neither the sanction, nor the efficiency of supreme law. It was, indeed, competent to declare war; but not to raise armies to carry it on. It was authorized to make treaties ; but not to regulate commerce — their most frequent and salutary object. It is fortunate that at this period when new and antagonist parties had arisen and conflicting views were to jeopard the fruit of our fathers’ toils, so many of the wise and good who had shared in the perils of the revolution still survived to stand at the public helm and direct the affairs of state. They had sought to establish a government for the public good — a popular govt.; and its foundations they hoped would be lasting — its structure cemented in the affections of free and equal sub- jects, all having knowledge of its operations and a participation in its exercise; but the perfecting work was yet to be done. There was danger that conflicting views would array state against state ; and even an approx-136 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Applications continued to be made by persons who had become aliens by reason of their predilection for royalty, for the privilege of becoming a naturalized”1 In 1790, Jan. 19, the town offered “a bounty of $25 to any who shall kill the wolf, catamount, or tiger, infesting this and the neighboring towns and destroying sheep; which bounty was in- creased to $30, Mar. 11, when it was “ordeied that if in the opin- ion of the com.” to whom the subject was referred, “ a general muster of the inhabitants be necessary to secure the depredator, every able-bodied man be called to engage in the duty.” — Lib- erty was granted “ to Elisha Bourne and associates to build a dam across Manomet River for the purpose of setting up a forge or other works.” — A review of the warrants addressed to the con- stables at this time and subsequently, directing them, as afore- time, “ to warn out of town ” new residents, shows that no excep- tions were made. Among the ‘ warned,’ were some of the most respectable. We have now arrived at a period from which we shall he less minute in our record of events; noting only the more important, and leaving for the future historian to diffuse minor matters that the records from this date will render plain and perfectly intelligible. imation to such an occurrence brought with it danger of rupture and disso- lution and general paralysis. Diversity of local interests necessarily gave rise to opposing wishes and opinions, the hope of the enemies of our coun- try, the fear of its friends. These hopes, these fears, were arrested by the Constitution. And yet, after the lapse of long years — after the work- ing of the system has seemed to be perfect as is compatible with the frailty of mortals, that Constitution is assailed! The fear has been expressed that we shall become 4 the shame of the world/ the Union dissolved! that, then, 44 with vastly augmented power and lust of domination in some of the States in comparison with the dangers from which the Constitution saved the country, and irremediable disparity in others leading to aggression, to war and to conquest, liberty will be buried in the same grave with the Con- stitution ! Not a single evil remedied, but the number augmented by tens of thousands.” — The contentions of 44 strangers who have never been allied,” it has been truly remarked by the distinguished civilian, are not like those of 44 brethren alienated, embittered, inflamed and irreconcilably hostile.” The dissolution of the Union! 44 It is the highest imprudence to threaten it, it is madness to intend it. If the Union we have cannot endure, the dream of the revolution is over, and we shall waken to the cer- tainty that a truly free government is too good for mankind.” 1 Upon application, and after reference to a com. who reported favorably, Ap. 7, 1788, it was 44 voted that, as it appears that no disadvantage will accrue to the State or town by permitting T. U., V. W., and X. Y., to be naturalized, this town recommends them as good subjects ; and that Abra- . ham Williams, Stephen Nye and Geo. Allen be a com. to petition the Gen. Ct. in their behalf.”ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 137 In 1792, the privilege of erecting, under proper restrictions, a saw-mill at the mouth of the Herring Pond, was granted to Benj. Bourne and others; also “ of setting up a forge or other works.” — The depredations of the wolf seem to have continued to the pres- ent time; “ a general muster of the inhabitants ” was ordered, “ for his destruction ” In 1794, Nathaniel Freeman Jr. Esq. received the unanimous vote, save one, as representative to Con- gress. — The vote on the revision of the Constitution, May 6, 1795, was unanimously in favor. — In 1796, May 2, in special town-meeting, Gen. Freeman being moderator, it was “ voted that the true spirit and mean- ing of the Constitution ought to be strictly adhered to; ” and that “this town do place full confidence in the wisdom and integrity of the House of Representatives in Congress respecting the Treaty lately negotiated with Great Britain” — In 1797, an ineffectual effort was made to divide the town; the movers desiring to include Monument, Pocasset, and some other portions in a new township. In 1800, the disputes which affected many parishes in the State, touching “ the compensation to ministers on account of a depre- ciated currency and the increased expenses of living,” did not fail to interrupt for a time the tranquillity of this town also. These were amicably adjusted here, Nov. 3, by the unanimous vote “to. stipulate the clergyman’s salary by the principal necessaries of life} so as to make the compensation equal to what it was at the time of the ordination of the Rev. Mr. Burr.”—Mr. Joshua Hall d.Feb. 24.1 Hon. Nathaniel Freeman Jr. d. Aug. 22. (See Vol. 1.561.) 1 Mr. Joshua Hall was b. in Dennis 1716. By his m. with Temperance Nye Oct. 4, 1744, who d. Nov. 27, 1803 se. 77, he had Mary Sept. 10, 1745 who m. Benj. Nye Jr. Dec. 3, 1765 ; Elisha Aug. 21, 1747; Stephen Dec. 4, 1749; Mehitable Mar. 9, 1752 who m. Lemuel Bassett May 21, 1772 and 2d David Parker; Thankful July 27, 1754 who m. John Knowles Mar. 15, 1774; Joanna Nov. 8, 1756 who d. unm. Dec. 3, 1777 ; Lydia June 18, 1759 who d. unm. May 16, 1790; Joshua Dec. 16, 1761; Joseph June 10, 1764; and Temperance Dec. 31, 1769 who m. Doct. Jonathan Leonard May 10, 1796.—Elisha, b. 1747, m. Deliverance Bassett Oct. 20, 1768, and had Jonathan May 17, 1769; and Elisha May 2, 1771. His widow m. 2d Isaac Knowles of E. — Stephen, b. 1749, m. Mary Freeman of E. Mar. 19, 1776, and 2d Cath. Davis of Be. Nov. 22, 1789, and had Gideon and VOL. II. 18138 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1801, May 14, the town consented to a canal across the Isthmus of the Cape, for the construction of which application was being made to the legislature by sundry persons for incorporation. — The boundary between this town and Barnstable was renewed; also between this town and Marshpee. In 1803, Melatiah Bourne Esq. d., Feb. 21, ». 68. In response to the petition of Rev. Jonathan Burr and others, “ Sandwich Academy was established ” Feb. 21, 1804, “and a Corporation of Trustees1 provided, for the purpose of promoting piety and virtue and for the education of youth in such languages and in such liberal arts and sciences as the trustees shall order and direct” A grant of one half-township of six square miles, of unappropriated lands in the District of Maine, was made by the legislature “for the use of said Academy — on condition that $3000 be actually raised and secured” from other sources for the endowment of the same.2 Nathaniel Freeman Esq. was authorized others, and d. Sept. 15, 1828. — Joshua, b. 1761, m. Eunice Winslow of H. Nov. 1790, and had Winslow and others, and d. July 14, 1835.— Joseph, b. 1764, m. Abigail Young of O., and had Joseph, Nehemiah, and Nabby Y.—Jonathan, g. s. of Joshua, b. 1769, m. Abigail Bascom, dr. Rev. Jona. of O., Oct. 9,1794, and d. Mar. 19,1806. They had Temperance, Elisha, Jona. B., Delia, Charles. 1 The trustees named in the Act of Incorporation were: “ Rev. Jonathan Burr, Hon. Nathl. Freeman, Dr. Jona. Leonard, Wendell Davis Esq., Jas. Freeman Esq., Mr. Wm. Fessenden, Rev. Henry Lincoln, Rev. Oakes Shaw, Mr. Wm. Bodfish, Rev. Levi Whitman, Rev. John Simpkins, Richard Sears Esq., David Scudder Esq., Rev. Nathan Stone, Thos. Thacher Esq., Rev. Jude Damon, Mr. Steph. Bassett, Thos. Jones Esq.” It wift be understood that a majority of this Board (10 out of 18) were residents in other towns ; Falm., Barnstable, Wellfleet, Brewster, Chatham, Dennis, Yarm., and Orleans being represented. It was designed to be a County institution, and as such was regarded. In the preliminary meetings held by prominent gent, in the county, for consultation — it being under- stood that this county was entitled to an appropriation of lands for an institution of learning — the decision was made that this town should be its location, with particidar reference to the preeminent qualifications of Rev. Mr. Burr as a finished scholar and successful instructor. 2 This sum was provided by the subscriptions of many persons in this town and others in the county; the subscribers giving their notes under aANNALS OF SANDWICH. 139 by said Act of General Court a to appoint the time and place of holding the first meeting of the Board of Trustees and to give notice of the same.” For several years after the opening of the academy it was among the most noted, flourishing and useful institutions of the kind in New England. To the Rev. Mr. Burr, more than to any other individual, are the establish- ment and high reputation of this school at its start to be attributed.1 In 1805, Oct. 24, d. Mr. John Nye;2 and 1806, Feb. 25, Mr. Sturgis Nye.8 In 1807, the bounds between this town and Falmouth were renewed. — The town petitioned the legislature “ for the better government of the Herring Pond and Marshpee Indians;” the system hitherto pursued having, in the opinion of the town, been “needlessly expensive without corresponding advantage to the governed.” — The Rev. Gideon Hawley d. this year, Oct. 3.4 supposed guarantee that their beneficence would secure to their children and to posterity the enjoyment of superior academical privileges. . 1 Mr. Burr was not only a fine scholar, but greatly interested, con amove, in the cause of education. His ‘ Compendium of English Grammar ’ long occupied a position in schools, widely and almost universally as did Noah Webster’s Spelling-book, and was highly appreciated. 2 Mr. John Nye was father of the late Capt. John Nye of the Army 1812, and from him is descended Gen. James W. Nye at present Gov. of Nevada Territory. 3 Mr. Sturgis Nye was son of Joseph Nye Esq., one of the most active men of the town during the revolutionary period. 4 We have already said much of Mr. Hawley, in our chapter on Marsh- pee, Vol. I.; and we the more gladly refer again to this venerable man, not only because, though residing among the people of his charge, he always claimed and had conceded to him the right of franchise in this town ; but that we may note some matters that have recently fallen under our eye. To the patronal ear of the N. E. Historic Gen. Soc., a paper has recently been read, and has since gone before the public, written by one who pro- fesses to have made Indian relics a subject of inquiry ; setting forth that on Cape Cod certain hearths have been discovered, called ‘ Indian hearths ’ — which qualifying appellation he regards as a misnomer inasmuch as, accord- ing to his views, the Indians never construct paved hearths, but scoop a hole in the earth and build their fires in that; and, to account for the exist- ence of these hearths found here, the gentleman supposes them to have been built by * the Northmen1 alleged by Danish antiquarians to have dis- covered the country in the tenth century. The theory is ingenious — sup- posing the premises to be correct; and to support that theory he argues that Vineland must not only have been an island near Cape Cod, but that upon the Cape itself they landed and constructed these hearths. We do not understand him to assert that Cape Cod was the island; for he inti- mates that the island may have disappeared, through the action of the sea140 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1808, the embargo restrictions were severely felt, as also in the succeeding year. The Academy had now probably reached the height of its prosperity, under the educational charge of that eminent instructor, Elisha Clap A. M. as preceptor,1 and Miss Bathsheba Whitman as preceptress.2 Religious dissensions now beginning to be rife in Massachusetts, did not fail to affect the hitherto generally united and prosperous congregation of which the Rev. Mr. Burr — which supposition he endeavors to support by reference to geological changes. It is true that some islands have disappeared; and it is also true that some parts of the formerly main land have become islands, as, for instance, Scraggy Neck in this town. But, unfortunately for the theorist, it remains to be disproved that the Indians of Cape Cod did construct paved hearths. Mr. Kendall, an English traveller of correct observation and much candor, assures the public that such hearths were in use among the Indians of Marshpee as late as 1807 when he visited the tribe. Although he found but one or two wigwams, the 400 inhabitants then existing having generally adopted the habits of the white people around them ; still in some instances where English houses in other respects were in use, the smoke was allowed to pass through a roof without chimney, the fireplace or hearth being built of brick. Mr. K. had good opportunities for investigation; for Mr. Hawley was yet living: “ I found Mr. H. infirm and far advanced in years, but I received from him a hospitality and welcome most fervent and gratifying. I remained two nights in his house, and experienced much attention, not only from himself, but his family also; and these circumstances have per- haps made the more impression upon me, because I had not reached Boston before I learned that he was dead.” Whilst on this subject of “ relics,” we may as well forestall the tempta- tion that might otherwise beset some future antiquarian to make a mar- vel of hieroglyphics upon rocks in Sandwich woods. They have, indeed, already become the wonder of some; especially the engravings upon a rock near Round-swamp. Possibly these annals may survive, and perad- venture may be consulted in future years ; and if they chance to meet the eye of a zealous antiquary who shall be ready to pronounce the engravings Runic, and to think he has found proof presumptive and almost posi- tive that Erik, or Biarne, or Thorstein was here, let him be advised that this town long years ago was the home of a lovelorn swain — belonging to a good family — who spent his hours chiefly “in leafy grove, or forest dense,” chiselling rude monuments of his passion. 1 Mr. Clap was a grad, of H. C. 1797. As an able teacher he was greatly distinguished, and among his pupils were many who became emi- nent men. Born in Dorchester June 25, 1776, he m. Mary, dr. of Hon. Rt. Treat Paine one of the signers of the Dec. In and d. iu Boston Oct. 22, 1830. 2 Miss Whitman was a most indefatigable and accomplished preceptress. She was from Bridgewater, dr. of Dea. John Whitman who lived to be over 106 yrs. of age. She d. at Bridgewater at a very advanced age, beloved and highly respected. *ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 141 was pastor; nor did unanimity characterize the admin- istration of the affairs of the Academy as heretofore.1 This seemed the only impediment to increased pros- perity. Large numbers resorted hither from all parts of the land, for instruction. In a year or two, as dis- putes and animosities increased, the number of pupils in the Academy began sensibly to diminish ; and so rapid was the decline that, before the close of the cor- poration’s first decade, it was evident a fatal blow 1 The year 1808-9 was a season of unusual attention to religion, and 115 persons were added to the church—a very large proportion of whom were heads of families. As the religious interest increased, so did opposition to the pastor and to the doctrines preached by him. Mr. Burr, when settled, was doubtless an Arian—but classed with those whose general religious sentiments were Arminian. A change of views involved a change in paro- chial instructions, and aroused opposition. Mr. Clap, a licensed preacher, was in the habit, by previous arrangement with the pastor, of taking the lead in public worship m Sandwich village every sixth Sunday when the pastor officiated in the meeting-house at Monument. Mr. Clap’s religious views were in unison with the opposition, and uncompromisingly against Calvin- ism. The Board was, at this time, very fairly constructed, consisting of Barnstable. Hon. John Davis, David Scudder Esq. Falmouth. Rev. Henry Lincoln, Thos. Jones Esq. Chatham. Richard Sears Esq. Brewster, Rev. John Simpkins. But Mr. Burr and others, in consequence of the religious dissensions which were now entering into the action of the Board, resigned their seats as trustees, and as vacancies occurred they were filled by the choice of per- sons of the town, so that in a short time the Academy was under direction wholly local and sectarian. The public interest in the institution was at an end, and the ample endownent, with the once bright prospects of Sandwich Academy, passed under a cloud ; so that when the inquiry has been made in later years respecting the endowment, echo but repeats the question. No regular provision has been made for academic instruction these many years, and the present building stands as if chiefly to remind the passer-by of the once splendid career of its predecessor. — We take pleasure in saying that, since the preceding lines were penned, we are assured that under the pru- dent management of Dr. Harpur of the present Board, some portion of the funds are saved and in course of accumulation. the following, (with two vacancies :) Sandwich. Hon. Nathl. Freeman, Pres., Rev. Jona. Burr, Dr. Jona. Leonard, Steph. Bassett Esq., Hon. Wendell Davis, Jas. Freeman Esq., Wm. Bodfish Esq., Mr. Wm. Fessenden, Treas., Mr. Elisha Clap, Sec. Yarmouth. Elisha Doane Esq.142 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. forbidding all hope of its future prosperity had been inflicted upon the institution. In 1809, Mr. Elisha Pope Sr. died, Feb. 1; Deacon Thomas Bassett, in May;1 Capt. Samuel Smith, June 17, also Wil- liam Bodfish Esq.2 1 Dea. Thomas Bassett, b. Jan. 4,1717-18, (see Vol. 1.351,) m. Patience Tobey Feb. 13,1746 ; and 2d wid. Hannah (Sturgis) Jennings Mar. 15,1775, had issue: Lemuel Feb. 26, 1747 who m. Mehit. Hall May 21, 1772; William July 6, 1749 who m. Mary Smith Mar. 24, 1774 ; Cornelius June 24, 1754 who m. Abigail Smith and went to Lee; and Deborah Nov. 1, 1766 who m. John Smith 1786.—William had Patience Dec. 12, 1774 who iq. Levi Nye May 10, 1795; Abigail Ap. 12, 1778 who m. Joshua Tobey Dec. 1, 1799 ; Thomas Nov. 17, 1780 who m. Abigail Swift 1810; John Jan. 8, 1783 who m. Lucy Fessenden 1812, and 2d Lucia Dillingham; William July 26, 1775 ; Mary Jan. 12, 1788 who m. Frs. F. Jones 1810 ; Charles Oct. 2, 1790 ; Nathan July 27, 1793 ; and Henry T. July 28, 1801. 8 Mr. Bodfish being a trustee of Sandwich Academy and also a military man, these circumstances aside from his position otherwise, made his obse- quies unusually imposing — the pupils of both departments of the Academy with their teachers and the trustees preceding the corpse, as also the mil- itary, in the funeral procession. For the likeness which appears on the opposite page, our acknowledgments are especially due to his grandsons, Mr. William Bodfish of W. Greenwich, R. I., and Mr. Robinson Crocker Bodfish of New York ; (to the latter we are under many obligations because of his patriotic interest in a faithful record of historical events — an ardor not inferior to his filial regard for ancestry.) Mr. B., more familiarly known by his military prefix, was descended from one of the earliest and most conspicuous of the first settlers. None of the name now remain in town; the branches of the family are widely dispersed. As veterans in genealog. investigations have not succeeded to their own satisfaction in demonstrating some matters of pedigree in relation to this family, we will not be expected to determine them beyond doubt; but we think the follow- ing is reliable : — The ancestor, Robert Bodfish, was early of Lynn, a freeman May 5, 1635, and in Sandwich 1637. He wus one of the six men (“ Geo. Allen, John Vincent, Wm. Newland, Rt. Bodfish, Anthony Wright, and Rd. Bourne ”) deputed by the town to conclude articles of agreement with Edmund Freeman, whereby, being “ acquitted of all damages by rea- son of his buying the purchase,” the latter, Feb. 26, 1647, assigned to these men representing the interests of the town, the entire purchase made of Gov. Bradford and associates. A Robert Sr. and Robert Jr. were in Lynn 1635, and there cannot be much doubt that these were father and son, both coming to S., the latter soon removing to Barnstable. The eldest was licensed “ to draw wine in S.” 1644, and filled sundry positions of trust; but d. Nov. 19, 1651. His wife, Bridget, is mentioned without name as a widow 1652, and as no record is made in S. of her decease, the presumption is that she became, Dec. 15, 1657, the 2d w. of Mr. Samuel Hinckley, father of Gov. H. The children of Robert 1st, we suppose, were Robert Jr. who removed to Be., Elizabeth, and Sarah. It should here be noted that a John Bodfish was of S. 1641, and a John Sr. is mentioned 1675, of both whom nothing further appears on the records. A birth of one, name illegibje, is mentioned Mar. 27, 1648. Mr. Savage says Elizabeth m. John Crocker, 2d w., Nov. 1659; and Sarah m. Peter Blossom June 4, 1663. But Mr. Otis says it was Mary who m. Crocker 1659. Mr. O. says “ Robert did not become an inhabitant of Be.” We have supposed that Robert Jr.3.UEOR 1st 1758I).JUNE 17th 1809 . L:ir, of SavoroAIaror &. Knapp 443 Broadway 1' .'iANNALS OF SANDWICH. 143 In 1810, the amount raised for schools was $500. — Mr. Ste- phen Nye d. July 6, ae. 90.1 In 1811, leave was “granted to Samuel Wing and others to erect a dam and works of a cotton-factory, on the stream between the upper and lower ponds in Sandwich village, at a place near Wolf- trap Neck so called.” did remove to Be., and had in S., before removal, Joseph b. Ap. 3, 1651. Robert was in Be. 1660, and it is said the family removed thither 1657. It may be that all these were children of Rt. 1st. Be that as it may, Joseph, of Barnstable, m. Elizabeth Bessey June 1674, and had John Dec. 6, 1675 ; Joseph Jr. Oct. 1677 ; Mary Mar. 1*4679 who m. Josiah Swift of S. Ap. 19, 1706; Hannah May, 1681 who Rd. Thomas; Benjamin July 20, 1683 ; Nathan Dec. 27, 1685; Ebenezer Mar. 10, 1687-8; Elizabeth Aug. 27, 1690 who prob. m. Reuben Blish Jan. 25, 1717; Rebecca Feb. 22, 1692-3 who m. Benj. Fuller Mar. 25, 1714; Melatiah Ap. 7, 1695 who m. Samuel Fuller June 20, 1725 ; Robert Oct. 10, 1698 ; and Sarah Feb. 20, 1700 who m. Joseph Smith Jr. Mar. 8, 1727. The father of this family d. Dec. 2,1744 ae. 94. — John, eldest of the preceding family, removed to this town from Be. and m. Sarah Nye of S. May 24, 1704. Issue : Mary Mar. 9, 1705-6 in S. who m. Wm. Freeman Dec. 6, 1726; John Feb. 5, 1708-9 ; Hannah Sept. 23, 1711 who m. Zeph. Hatch of R. I. Ap. 3, 1735; Joanna Oct. 22, 1714 who d. Jan. 20, 1735-6 ; Sarah Mar. 21, 1717 who m. Eben Hatch 2d of Falm. Mar. 3, 1742; Elizabeth Mar. 30, 1720-1 who m. Nathan Nye Jan. 29, 1747 ; and Joseph Sept. 20, 1725. — Joseph, of S., youngest of the preceding, m. Mary Ellis Sept. 5, 1745, and had Sylvina June 19, 1746 who m. Silas Hatch 1767; Nathan Mar. 19, 1748; Hannah Jan. 18, 1750 ; Nymphas May 5, 1752 who removed to Maine ; Mary Dec. 30, 1754 who m. James Chrystie Dec. 25, 1785 ; Joseph Oct. 9, 1756; and William Dec. 1, 1758. — William Esq., youngest of the last, m. 1st. Lois Nye of F., dr. of Sol., 1784, who b. Mar. 15, 1761, d. Dec. 9, 1793, and 2d Abigail Fessenden of S., dr. of Mr. Benj. Ap. 14, 1794, who b. Feb. 26, 1764, d. Aug. 21, 1852. Issue: Sally D. Mar. 15, 1788 who d. Ap. 3, 1843; William Ap. 4, 1789 ; Joseph Nov. 13, 1790 who d. Sept. 12, 1809 ; Loisa N. Sept. 30, 1793 who m. Wm. Eldridge of R. I. 1819 and d. 1821; Sylvina H. Oct. 6, 1796 who m. Rev. Benj. Haines 1846; Nathan June 22, 1799 who d. in N. Orleans ; James H. June 6, 1801 who m. Eliza Hobbs Nov. 26, 1829 and d. Mar. 14, 1850; Abigail F. Dec. 29, 1802 who m. Rd. Edwards Jr. Oct. 29, 1827 ; Thomas F. Sept. 13, 1804 who d. Nov. 21, 1817; and Russell S. Dec. 14, 1805 who m. Sarah J. Coffin of Nan- tucket Ap. 24, 1828. — For further gen., see Barnstable and Falmouth. — The gentleman whose portrait we present, was of a social and generous dis- position, public spirited and enterprising. Largely engaged in commercial pursuits, his encouragement of ship-building and maritime adventures imparted to these departments of industry a prominence that gradually declined after his decease and has never been renewed to the same extent. He represented the town in the Gen. Ct. seven years, and was also Jus. Pac. 1 Mr. Stephen Nye, active and patriotic in the revolutionary period, was son of Nathan who m. Dorothy Bryant Ap. 12, 1715, and had Rebecca Nov. 26, 1715; Mary Ap. 26, 1718 ; St'ephen June 6, 1720; Nathan Oct. 13, 1722 who was father of Peleg, Peter, Nathan, Nathaniel, &c.; Deborah Oct. 5, 1726; and William Sept. 1, 1733 who was the father of Elisha. — Stephen m. Maria Bourne June 7, 1744, and had Elisha Ap. 27, 1745 who m. Lucy Tobey Ap. 2, 1767, and removed to Maine; John Dec. 22, 1746 who resided at Monument; Nathan Jr. Feb. 20, 1749 who m. Hannah144 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Certificates, under ‘the Religious Freedom Act,’ began now to be lodged with the town clerk, by inhabitants claiming to be members of the Methodist Society; “the Methodist Society of Sandwich and Falmouth” having been incorporated Feb. 28. — The connection of Rev. Mr. Burr as pastor of the ancient Congrega- tional Parish, was dissolved Sept. 5. Lord Bacon has well remarked, “The greatest vicissitude of things is the vicissitude of sects and religions: the true religion is built upon a rock; the rest are tossed upon the waves of time.” Gideon Hawley Esq. and Ms estate were tMs year set off from Marshpee to tMs town.—Mr. Motto Bryant d. Ap. 10; and Mr. Malachi Ellis d. June 23. — The sudden death by casualty of an enterprising young ship-builder, James Ghrystie Jr., Nov. 9, was the occasion of deep sympathy.1 The declaration of war in 1812 found the inhabitants here, as in other towns, divided in regard to great national questions with the usual amount of party zeal and acerbity.—Seth Freeman Esq. died July 19, aged 81. In 1813, certificates were lodged, March 5, in behalf of a large number of persons, 159, as members of a religious association called the Calvinistic Congrega- tional Society. These were adherents to the ministry of Rev. Mr. Burr.2— Succeeding him as minister of the Butler Dec. 10, 1772, and Sarah (Fessenden) Allen May 15, 1796, and was many years selectman of the town ; Hannah May 10,1751 who m. Tobey of Macnias; Stephen Jr. Ap. 30, 1753; Susanna and Abigail, gem., July 27, 1755 the latter of whom m. Motto Bryant; Jonathan Nov. 27, 1757 ; Wil- liam Nov. 24, 1760; Zenas Mar. 31, 1763 who m. Mary Freeman Feb. 10, 1785 ; Rebecca Jan. 24, 1766 who m. Paul Gifford; Christina Ap. 1769; and Sabria. 1 He was killed by the falling of a mast which he was engaged in placing in position; and the fact that he was expecting to be married within a few days, gave intensity to the general regrets. He was s. of James Chrystie Sr., long time a noted master shipwright, who m. Mary Bodfish Dec. 5, 1785, and had James Jr. Nov. 25, 1786 ; Mary Mar. 10, 1788 who m. Benj. F. Lombard of Boston Sept. 20, 1808 ; Lois Ap. 3, 1791; George Nov. 28, 1792; and Esther Mar. 20, 1795 who m. John Fessenden. Mr. C. was of Scotch extraction. * The contest which resulted in the dismission of the Rev. Mr. Burr from the 1st Parish was long and severe. The parties were -finally pretty evenlyANNALS OF SANDWICH. 145 First Parish, was the Rev. Ezra S. Goodwin, ordained March 17.—Mr. Branch Dillingham died April 21. In 1814, Feb. 26, an Act incorporating William Fes- senden Esq. and others under the title of “ the Calvin- istic Cong. Soc. in Sandwich,” was passed by the legis- lature, the first meeting to be called by Nathl. Freeman Esq.; and said society was soon duly organized. A com. of public safety was app., June 27, the movements of the enemy on the surrounding waters constantly threatening de- struction of property; and sd. com. was authorized to apply to the proper authorities for a detachment of the militia of the town to guard the shores. — Contributions having been forced from some of the towns, and being demanded of others, by the enemy, as the condition on which towns would be exempt from conflagration and private or public property from depredation, it was here voted, Sept. 20, that “ in case of any attack by the enemy we will defend the town to the last extremity.” Application was made to the Gov. and Council “ for 50 stand of arms and 2 six-pound field-pieces with ammunition and equipments” also “for 150 soldiers to be stationed in the town ready for any emergency.” — Wm. Drody d. this year, Oct. 6, ae. 30.1 In 1815, the selectmen were instructed to petition the legisla- ture for the repeal of the Act connecting the Counties of Dukes and Nantucket with Barnstable County for the choice of senator. — The remarkable storm of Sept. 23 has been already noticed in our first volume.2 balanced, only two or three majority being obtainable for the dissolution of the connection. In the church it was otherwise ; 99 members (44 males and 55 females) adhered to their pastor, and 14 were opposed. By legal technicalities, the minority of the church retained the church temporalities .and records. The majority claimed to be the ancient church, holding “ that a church is a distinct body from the parish, independent of it for its exist- ence and the exercise of its discipline and rights.” By Councils this claim was sustained; but by the Sup. Court was overruled. The funds of the church, chiefly the accumulations from sacramental contributions, went, therefore, into the hands of the minority ! 1 Drowned by accident on board a vessel in the Bay. The father of Mr. D., Samuel, was Scotch-Irish, and wa3 twice married. By the two wives, Sarah and Sylvia, he had Samuel May 16, 1782 who m. Mary Nye Nov. 22, 1803 ; William Mar. 5, 1784 Charles Ap. 18, 1787 ; Sarah Aug. 8, 1789 ; Thomas Jan. 25, 1792; Allen G. June 6, 1794; James; and Sylvia Jan. 11, 1802. — Charles b. 1787, m. Betsy Nye, dr. Wm., and had Charles Mar. 31, 1818; Deborah N. Mar. 20, 1821; James C. May 28, 1823 ; Sarah M. Mar. 2, 1828; and James C. Oct. 21, 1825. 8 The only loss df life in this town by that storm was of a young woman, VOL. II. 19146 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1816, the country being again free from the tur- moil of war, business began to resume its wonted chan- nels. — Hon. James Freeman, high sheriff of the county, died Jan. 10. In 1817, the Rev. Mr. Burr requesting it, his con- nection with the people of his charge was dissolved; not in consequence of any disaffection, for the society was perfectly harmonious and highly prosperous.1 — Mr. William Freeman died July 3, and Stephen Bassett Esq. died Sepi 18.2 In 1818, Jan. 18, the town having received order of notice on the petition of Israel Thorndike and others for leave to cut a canal through the Isthmus of Cape Cod, it was “ voted that such a work if practicable will be of public utility and that this town will interpose no obstacle.” — The Rev. David L. Hunn was ordained Feb. 25, over the Calvinistic church and society. The Monument Congregational Church which had hitherto been a constituent part of the Calvinistic society, was by consent to be constituted a distinct church, and a distinct parish was organized.3 Miss Temperance, dr. of Mr. Caleb Perry. She was passenger on board a vessel bound to Newport. The vessel sought a harbor in N. Bedford, but was driven furiously against a wharf, and Miss P. was drowned notwith- standing strenuous efforts of the citizens of N. Bedford to rescue her. 1 Mr. Burr removed to Boston; but finally returned to pass the residue of his honored and useful life in this town. 2 Stephen Bassett Esq. was gt. g. s. of Col. William, g. s. of William and Abigail, and s. of Nathaniel, who m. Hannah Hall of Y. July 4, 1745, and had Rebecca, Joseph, Abigail, Edmund, Hannah, Nathl., Elisha, Stephen, Jonathan, Anselm, and Isaac.—Joseph m. Cynthia Tobey Oct. 10, 1773, and wid. Grace (Carnes) Webb 1802, and had Rebecca May 22, 1777, who m. Thacher Lewis; Edmund Nov. 22,1780, who m. Mary Nye; Hannah May 12, 1786, who m. Joseph Dimmick; Joseph July 13, 1790; Cynthia Feb. 19, 1803, who m. Joseph Hamblen; and Celia Jan. 1, 1805, who m. Jona. E. Chipman. — Stephen Esq. m. Elizabeth Newcomb Nov. 20,1788, and had Martha B. Oct. 15,1796, who m. Chs. Nye; and Elizabeth Sept. 5, 1799, who m. Ezra Tobey. — Jonathan m. Temperance Crocker, 1790, and had Nathl. Oct. 17, 1793; David Oct. 3, 1795; and Lydia May 1, 1799. 3 The Monument church at its organization consisted of about 30 mem- bers ; and the withdrawal from the parent church was on account of the distance rendering it inconvenient for their families to attend service in the Centre.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 147 In 1819, May 3, it was voted by the town that “ there shall be no retailer of distilled liquors licensed in this town after the expi- ration of the present licenses; and that tavern-keepers be notified that unless they desist from mixing and selling to town-dwellers they are not to be approbated after their present term.” In 1820, Oct. 16, Russell Freeman, Elisha Pope, and Seth F. Nye, Esqs., were chosen delegates to the Convention to be held in Boston in Nov. prox. for revising the Constitution of the State.— The bounds of this town and Plym. were renewed, June 30. The incidents that we shall record henceforward will be few. Our pages are already swollen far beyond our expectations, and we hasten over the remaining years to the conclusion of these annals. In 1821, a venerable citizen, Mr. Josiah Ellis, d., Aug. 27, se. 76. In 1824, Capt. Seth Freeman d., Oct. 28. — The Pocasset or 2d Precinct, originally Congregational, having for many years abdicated its claims to the distinction by favoring the use of its property by the Methodists, about this time under the ministry of Rev. Mr. Britt assumed the title of Reformed Methodist — renouncing the government of so-called bishops and the plan of itinerancy. — In 1825, the sad disaster occurring by which the town was involved in grief for the loss at sea of a number of its most enterprising young men, has been mentioned Vol. I. 625. Dea. Thomas H. Tobey, a good man and valuable citizen, d. the same year;1 also Mr. Charles Gibbs, Nov. 6.2 In 1826, Jan. 21, the loss of Capt. Josiah Ellis Jr. and others occurred in the Bay, as has been noticed Vol. I. 773. Mr. Benjamin Freeman d. Mar. 10. A com. was app. by the town to prevent strangers taking sand and stones from the sea-shore to the injury of the beach. The town also petitioned Congress for the erection of a light-house at Beach Point in Barnstable. The bounds between this town and Barnstable were renewed. The appropriation for free schools this year was $ 800. 1 Dea. Tobey was 4th son of John Jr. who m. Mercy Howes of Y. Nov. 15, 1759. Dea. Thomas H., b. Oct. 1, 1770, m. Thankful Crowell of F., Mar. 1, 1799, and had Freeman C. May 8, 1806, and Watson F. Feb. 10, 1809. The youngest of the family of John Jr., was James, b. Jan. 4, 1778, who m. Temperance Crowell of F., 1804, and d. Dec. 15,1855, ae. 77: 11: 11. He had Josiah Aug. 31, 1808. 2 From Thomas Gibbs who was here 1639, were descendants almost innu- merable. Mr. Charles Gibbs, b. May 9,1756, was son of Barnabas b. 1722, who was son of Barnabas b. 1684, who was s. of John b. 1644, who was s. of Thomas.148 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1827, the bounds between this town and Falmouth were renewed. — A reward of $100 was offered by the town to encour- age the killing of a wolf that was causing great destruction of sheep. Mr. Peleg Hoxie d. Mar. 14, ae. 38; and Hon. Nathan- iel Freeman, Sept. 20, ae. 87.1 In 1828, Col. John Freeman d. ae. 65. — The town voted that 1 Dr. Freeman was b. Mar. 28, 1741, O. S., and was the 3d son of Mr. Edmund.Freeman b. 1711, of the line of Edmunds. He m. Tryphosa Colton of Killingly, Ct., May 5,1763, who d. July 11,1796, ae. 53, and 2d Elizabeth Gifford, wid. of Josiah of Falmouth and dr. of Mr. John Handy of this town. His children were: Edmund May 4, 1764, (who was a practical printer, dis- tinguished by his editorial abilities and sterling wit,—publisher and editor of “ The Herald of Freedom ” commenced by him Sept. 1788, “ a paper,” says the late J. T. Buckingham, “ remarkable for the boldness of its tone in narrating current events,”) m. Elizabeth Pattee of Maine and d. July 1,1807, leaving a family; Nathaniel Mar. 1, 1766, who grad. H. C. 1787, and m. Polly Ford of Boston, and wTas twice elected to Congress—continuing a member from 1797 to his decease Aug. 22, 1800; Abigail Aug. 23, 1768, who m. Col. Abraham Williams Jan. 4,1786, and 2d Geo. Ellis of Fairfield, Me., Mar. 15, 1801; Martha June 10, 1770, who m. Wm. Fessenden Esq. Aug. 7, 1794; Jonathan Otis Ap. 6, 1772, who m. Lucy Crocker of Falm. Dec. 10, 1794, and d. in Washington, N. C., Nov. 2, 1835, having been highly esteemed as a physician, honored as a clergyman of the Presbyterian church, and eminent as an instructor of youth—remembered by many of the prominent citizens of the South as their honored preceptor and most valued iriend—leaving two sons, the one a counsellor at law, the other a physician; Rufus Oct. 18,1773, who m. Hannah Palmer of Falmouth, and d. in Charles- ton, S. C., Mar. 5, 1807, leaving a family; Tryphosa C. Dec. 14, 1775, who m. Capt. Samuel Parker of Barnstable Mar. 30,1797; Sarah June 16,1778, who m. Shadrach Freeman Esq. Mar. 22, 1795; Nancy Sept. 2, 1780, who d. Mar. 24, 1790; Russell Oct. 7, 1782, who having been settled some time in Maine in the profession of the law, returned to the practice in this county, and m. Eliza J. Sturgis, dr. Capt. Thos. of Be., 1817, and d. Jan. 9, 1842; Abraham Williams Aug. 17, 1784, who removed to Maine and m. Nancy Fairfield Nov. 1, 1809; Geo. W. June 13, 1789, who settled in N. Carolina and m. Ann Yates Gholson, dr. of Col. Wm. Yates and wid. of Hon. Wm. Gholson of Va., and after being several years distinguished as an instructor of youth, was many years rector of Christ Church, Raleigh, N. C., and then of Emanuel Church, Newcastle, Del., receiving the honorary degree of D. D. from the University of N. C. 1839, and unanimously elected Bishop of the South-Western Diocese embracing the whole of Texas, Arkansas, and the Indian Territory, 1844, consecrated Oct. 26, his death occurring at Little Rock, Ark., Ap. 29, 1858—leaving sons: Frederick Dec. 1, 1799, who m. Elizabeth Nichols dr. of Geo. N. Esq. of Raleigh, N. C., Dec. 26, 1821, 2d Hannah Huntington Wolcott dr. of Hon. Frederick W. of Litchfield, Ct., Ap. 21, 1§&4>and 3d Isabella Williams dr. of Capt. Hartwell Williams of Augusta, Me.,) Nov. 18, 1841; Tryphosa Colton Jan. 24, 1801, who m. Rev. Louis Jansen June 16,1837, and d. in Bolivar, Tenn., May 11,1852; Nancy Jan. 24, 1802, who d. Dec. 8, 1804; Nathaniel Ap. 19, 1803; Elizabeth H., May 23, 1804, who m. Rev. Davis Lothrop Mar. 6, 1827; Love Swain July 23,1805, who m. Weston R. Gales Esq., mayor of the city of Raleigh, N. C., Ap. 21,1825 ; Tryphena July 9,1808, who m. Capt. Isaian Harding Feb. 24, 1837; and Hannan B. Mar. 24, 1810, who d. Dec. 21, 1848:—a family of twenty children, all of whom but two lived to adult age and married.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 149 none shall be approbated as retailers of intoxicating liquors. — In 1829, the amount appropriated for public schools was $1200. In 1830, the pastoral relation between the Rev. David L. Hunn and the Trinitarian Congregational church and society was dissolved;1 and Hon. Wendell Davis, counsellor at law, at times representative of the town in the legislature and state senator, and now high sheriff, died Dec. 30.2 (See Yol. I. 630.) In 1831, in the month of January, a heavy snow, about 3 feet deep in the woods, proved fatal to great numbers of deer. People provided with snow-shoes, barbarously captured or killed about 200; of these 40 1 Rev. Mr. Hunn was from Longmeadow, and a grad, of Yale. 2 It may be expected, perhaps, that we will note with particularity the profession of Law, as illustrated by its members in the progress of the town. It would be a pleasure to do so; but in any such attempt difficulties are to be met. In the early days of the colony, there were few, if any, whose edu- cation had been exclusively directed to legal attainments. The same, indeed, may be said of the profession of Medicine. It so continued for many years. In fact, strange as it may now appear, the clergy—to whom has been gen- erally conceded by historians a large share as “the principal instruments in keeping alive the spirit of enterprise in the wilds of America ”—were, how- ever arduous their ecclesiastical functions, “ the trusted physicians and law- yers in the communities of their respective parishes” for several generations. And it has been conceded also that whilst they were able and learned theologians, they “ generally were very far from contemptible as lawyers.” Towards the close of the first hundred years, a change begins to be apparent. The names, however, of those who were, in strict technicality, members of the legal profession, it is difficult to designate with certainty until a much later period. To say nothing of those who constituted the first courts, Mr. Richard Bourne very early, Shearjashub Bourne Esq. as early as 1676, and Mr. Samuel Prince from the year 1682, were much conversant with the duties that appertain to the profession. Hon. Ezra Bourne was a lawver, both by education and profession as well as practice as early as 1700. Uol. Win. Bassett, Mr. Samuel Jennings, and Silas Bourne Esq., were all lawyers by courtesy, if we may judge by the frequency of then* employment in legal matters; and so, certainly, was Nathaniel Otis Esq., if he was not, de facto, a member of the bar. But the first in town that we can with confidence pronounce a professional lawyer, if we except Hon. Ezra Bourne who was early on the bench, is Hon. Timothy Ruggles, about 1739. Mr. Solomon Foster, town-clerk, was, by force of circumstances probably, rather than from a desire for professional honors, called to the performance of many duties that now devolve on the profession; as were others at a later period. The next, however, that we find in town to whom the honors are fully accorded, is Hon. Nathaniel Freeman Jr. Esq., and next, immediately on his decease, is Hon. Wendell Davis ; then Hon. Russell Freeman, Seth F. Nye Esq., and C. B. H. Fessenden Esq., at later periods. The present occupant of the position is E. S. Whittemore Esq.150 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. were taken alive. The stock was, by this unworthy act, sensibly diminished: “ As flies, to wanton boys— They kill us for their sport.” The Rev. Asahel Cobb was installed pastor of the Trinitarian church and society March 31. — Capt. Thomas Swift died April 9.1 In 1832, additional legislation was found necessary to prevent the destruction of shell-fish. The line between this town and Falmouth was renewed. — Mr. Elisha Burgess d. Nov. 10, ae. 89.J In 1833, the Rev. Ezra S. Goodwin died Feb. 5 j3 and the Rev. John M. Merrick was installed as his successor 1 The Swifts descended from Mr. William, who d. 1642, are like the stars for multitude. Capt. Thomas m. Cynthia Blackwell Oct. 3, 1793, but left no issue. He was son of Thomas, who m. Abigail Phillips Nov. 15, 1752, and had William Sept. 4,1753, who d. young; Clark Sept. 23, 1755; Re- becca Feb. 12, 1760, who m. Seth Swift; Joseph June 30,1762; Nathaniel Dec. 31, 1764; Maria Ap. 28, 1767, who m. Jonathan Beale of Braintree Nov. 29,1787; Thomas Jr. May 13,1772; William May 1,1777; and Levi Mar. 13,1780. Joseph b. 1762, removed with most of his family to Scipio, N. Y. He was father of Rev. Seth who grad. H. C. 1807 and was settled at Nantucket, but d. in Oswego, N. Y., Oct. 12, 1858, se. 71.—Branches from Jireh, who m. Abigail Gibbs Nov. 26, 1697, became widely dispersed and some were much noted. Among these, were Dea. Jireh of Acushnet b. in S. 1709; Rev. Seth of Williamstown s. of Jabez, and his son Rev. Elisha of Pittsburg; Rev. Dr. Job b. in S. 1743 and grad. Yale 1765; and Hon. Zephaniah LL.D. who grad. Yale 1778, was in Cong. 1793, sec. of legation with Mr. Ellsworth to France, judge 1801, and Chf. Just, of Connecticut 1806-19, “ learned and upright,” and author of treatises long recognized as authority in courts. 2 We have mentioned Mr. Burgess’ lineage, p. 91. The family name has been numerous in town, and branches are widely spread. From Jacob, son of Thomas Sr. is descended also the Rev. Ebenezer Burgess D. D. of Dedham. By another branch of the same original stock is the Rt. Rev. Geo. Burgess D. D. bishop of the Episcopal Church in Maine. From Thomas Jr., who left the town about 1661 with no very favorable antece- dents, is supposed to be descended the distinguished Hon. Tristram Bur- gess of R. I. 3 See Yol. I. 634. Over the grave of Rev. Mr. G. is a monument thus inscribed: “In memory—of—Rev. Ezra Shaw Goodwin—Pastor—of the first Cong. Church—and—Society in Sandwich,—who died—Feb. 5, A. D. 1833 — in the — 46th year of his age — and—in the 20th yr. of his ministry.—This memorial—of—their beloved Pastor—is—here placed by his bereaved flock—with—grateful recollections—of—the services, virtues, and endowments—of their—pious instructor, their enlightened guide, their faithful—counsellor, their constant work-fellow—in—the cause of Chris- tian liberty,—their cherished associate, their generous—and—affectionate friend. — Absent in the flesh, yet with us in the spirit.”ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 151 in charge of the First Parish, May 11. The Monument Church was organized July 9; and about the same time a meeting-house that had been set up near Snake Pond was removed to Pocasset to be occupied by Bap- tists. — Mr. Walley Goodspeed died July 3.1 In 1834, measures were taken to provide increased and better accommodations for the town’s poor.—Mr. Jeremiah Bowman d. Ap. 11 ;2 and Mr. Levi Nye, July 9, ae. 61.3 In 1835, horses, cattle, and swine were restrained from running at large. — Dea. Lemuel Freeman d. this year, Aug. 24, ae. 78 ;4 and Mr. Lazarus Ewer, May 2, ae. 89.5 1 For Goodspeed genealogy see Barnstable. 2 He was descended from Thomas Bowman (sometimes written Bowerman, Burman, and Bourman) who was early in Barnstable, and whose posterity were early in Falmouth, where David was b. who m. Ruth Dillingham dr. of Jeremiah, and 2d Hannah Wing dr. of Zaccheus, and had Jeremiah, Thomas, and Peace. Jeremiah m. Deborah, dr. of Zaccheus Wing, and sister to his father’s 2d wife, and removed as did his father to Sidney, Me., but returned to this town 1788. His children were: Charlotte; David who m. Sarah Allen; Ruth who m. Benj. Swift; Abner; and Asa 1786. The mother d. Feb. 12,1816. — See Falmouth. 3 Mr. Nye was a devoted Methodist and local preacher. His line of de- scent from Benjamin 1st was by Jonathan b. Nov. 20,1649; Benjamin b. 1697; Thomas b. 1741 who m. Thankful Blossom June 7, 1764. He ^ras b. Feb. 16, 1773, and m. Patience Bassett May 10, 1795, and Elizabeth Bourne Feb. 5, 1802. The 4th of the issue was Lemuel B. Ap. 23, 1805, who m. Eliza Sears Ap. 21, 1833. 4 Dea. Lemuel Freeman was descended from that branch of the family of Mr, Edmund and Sarah Freeman, at the head of which stands Benjamin. b. in 1686, who m. PaHence~Nye“ Jan. 30, 1712-13, and d. Feb. 23, 1773, sb. 87. They had Phebe Mar. 29, 1713, who m. Ellis; Josiah Jan. 27, 1715-16, who m. Bethiah Hall Mar. 22,1743-4, and removed to Middleboro’; Remember Mar. 9, 1717-18, who m. Edward Dillingham Mar. 24, 1741-2; and Benjamin Sept. 9, 1725. — Benjamin, the youngest of the preceding, m. Sarah Nye Nov. 11,1756, and d. Jan. 5,1784-5, ae. 58. They had Sarah 1757, who m. Amaziah Wilcox who was drowned Jan. 10, 18*16; Lemuel 1758; Remember who m. John Thacher of Barnstable July 28, 1785; Ben- jamin; and Patience who m. Henry Wood July 19, 1798, and removed to Little Compton.—Of this last family, Dea. Lemuel m. Mercy Hoxie Sept. 22,1790, and Bathsheba Fessenden May 26, 1793, and had Mercy Aug. 27, 1792; Sally F. May 10, 1795, who m. James N. Bassett; Nathan Sept. 13, 1797; Henry W. Ap. 6, 1800; Benj. Aug. 4, 1802, who d. young; Rebecca Oct. 28, 1805, who m. James N, Bassett Nov. 1,1827; and Bathsheba Feb. 9,1808, who m. Caleb Nickerson of Provincetown Ap. 6,1830.—Benjamin, brother of Dea. Lemuel, m. Matte Eldredge of Falmouth, and d. Mar. 10, 1826. They had Lucy Ap. 9,1794, who m. Asa S. Bowley Esq. of Province- town Mar. 10, 1839; Ezra Aug. 3, 1797, who m. Polly Nickerson Oct. 4, 1824, and d. July 29, 1839; Watson May 19, 1800, who m. Mary Atkins Dec. 2, 1824; Cynthia Jan. 13, 1803; and Kilburn W. Oct. 21, 1806, who m. Ann P. Holmes Jan. 13, 1828.—Nathan Esq. of Provincetown, Prest. of the Bank, is son of Dea. Lemuel. 6 Mr. Lazarus Ewer, b. June 9, 1746, son of Shubael who m. Martha152 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1837, the town voted to receive its proportion of the surplus revenue of the National Government; the interest to be used for the support of schools, for the maintenance of which $ 2000 was appropriated.—Mr. Silas Swift d. Feb. 5.1 In 1838, as appears by a diary kept by an aged citizen, “there was no snow from 18th Dec. last to Feb. 3.” In 1839, Rev. Mr. Merrick retired from the pastorate of the First Parish, and in Sept, the Rev. Eliphalet P. Crafts was installed over the same. In 1840, Mr. Nathaniel Fuller d. Ap. 9; and Mr. Wm. J. Freeman, town-clerk, Oct. 9.2 In 1841, Mr. Thomas Pope d. Feb. I;3 Mr. Joshua Tobet, Mar. 4; and Capt. Prince Tupper, Aug. 18, ae. 75. Tobey Jan. 1, 1740-1, who was son of John b. 1692 and m. Elizabeth Lumbard July 5,1716, who was son of Thomas of Barnstable, son of Thomas of this town who d. 1667, had by his wife Lydia a large family. 1 Mr. Swift was descended from William, the original of a numerous race, through Benjamin who m. Hannah Wing Feb. 24,1703-4 and appears among the Quaker remonstrants in Falm. in 1731; and Benjamin who m. Waitstill Bowman. Mr. Silas Swift, s. of the latter, b. 7: 18: 1746 in F., removed to this town 1780. By his m. with Elizabeth Bumpas he had 13 children, his youngest son being Dr. Paul now of Haverford College, Pa. 2 Mr. Freeman was of the line of descent of that branch from Edmund and Sarah, of which the head was William, b. 1700, who m. Mary Bodfish Dec. 6, 1726, and d. Mar. 13, 1786, se. 85, whose issue was: Hannah Sept. 13, 1728, who m. Silas Tupper June 2, 1757, and finally removed to Vt.; Thomas Mar. 4, 1729-30, who m. Phebe Hall Oct. 9, 1752, and was one of the first settlers of the town of Barnard abt. 1775, taking with him sons Wm., Thos., Elisha, Joshua, and Stephen, and who in after life often re- marked that he “came from where the guns of Bunker-hill battle were heard;” Rebecca Mar. 2,1731-2, who prob. m. Jona. Nye Jr. Mar. 18,1756; William June 3, 1734, who settled in Carver; Joanna Mar. 21, 1736-7, who m. Nathaniel Page of Hardwick Sept. 13, 1759; Sarah July 26, 1739, who m. Levi Nye June 9,1767, and removed to Lee; Elisha Nov. 21,1741, who m. Elizabeth Percival, Nov. 12, 1767, and with his family removed to Lee; Joshua Ap. 6, 1744; and Mary July 20, 1746, who d. single, having attained to great age.—Of the preceding, Joshua, b. 1744, youngest son, m. Mehit. Blossom and 2d Lydia Blackwell wid. of Micah May 15, 1796, and had Levi Dec. 29, 1770; Joseph Sept. 9, 1773 — both these dying when near their majority of a prevailing fever that took off the mother also; Hannah Feb. 18,1775, who m. Thos. Eldred of F., Feb. 12, 1795; Rebecca Aug. 10, 1778, who m. David Crowell of F., Nov. 27, 1800; William Aug. 19, 1780; Joanna Jan. 18, 1783, who d. young; Joshua Feb. 21, 1786, who m. Nabby Fuller Nov. 4,1813, and removed to Worcester; Mehitable Mar. 20, 1789, who m. Joseph Blish 3d of Be., Oct. 16, 1809, and removed to Illinois; and Thos. N. July 22, 1791, who m. Deborah F. Nye and was lost at sea. — Of this last family, William, b. 1780, d. July 3,1817, having had by his wife Mehit., David C. Oct. 29, 1806, who m. Jane A. Newcomb; Rebecca C. Mar. 19,1809, who m. Wm. Atkins Jr.; Lydia Oct. 6,1811, who m. Alvah Holway; and Willtam J. Mar. 6, 1814, the town-clerk. 3 Were we to give a full gen. of the Popes, it would necessarily embraceANNALS OP SANDWICH. 153 In 1842, the amount voted for schools was $2180 in addition to the interest of the surplus revenue fund. Rev. Asahel Cobb retired from the pastorate of the Calvinistic Congregational church. Hon. Russell Freeman d. Jan. 9;1 Rev. Jona. Burr, Aug. 2;2 Elisha Perry Jr. Esq., Nov. 19;3 and Mr. Wm. Faunce, Dec. 7 4 Inuch obtained from the Plym. and Dart, records. The name appears on the records here abt. 1700. John and Seth, brothers, were the first here. The descendants of the former, though numerous, are now scattered abroad and have no representatives in this town. Among them were Seth Jr. b. 1700-1, whose large family branched to Bridgewr., Halifax, Fairhaven, En- field, Ct., and other places; Thomas, b. 1709, who m. Thankful Dillingham of Harwich Sept. 26, 1735, and had Lydia May 18, 1738, and Edward Feb. 15, 1739-40, and went to Acushnet where he d. Mar. 2, 1784, leaving Ed- ward Esq., judge, collector, &c., who d. 1818, and was the father of Thomas of Michigan; Ezra, b. Ap. 3, 1719, who m. Sarah Freeman Aug. 18, 1748, and went to Newport; and Charles, b. Feb. 28,1724-5, who went to Falm. — The other brother, Seth Sr., is still represented in this town. Our notes are copious, but room is wanting; suffice therefore to say, from his two grandsons were all who are now of Sandwich, and branches dispersed; viz.: Elisha, b. Nov. 1, 1740, son of John, m. Joanna Tobey Feb. 15, 1761, and d. Feb. 1, 1809. He was father of John b. July 8, 1762, who m. Mary Freeman Sept. 29, 1785, and d. Mar. 4, 1829, in Maine whither he had re- moved with his family of which is John Capt. U. S. N., b. in S. Dec. 17, 1798; also of William, Warren, Hon. Elisha, Lewin, and others.— Lemuel, b. Ap. 23, 1743, the only other son of John b. 1716, who was the only son of Seth Sr., m. Mary Butler Oct. 25, 1764, and from him were Daniel, Thomas, Lemuel, Joseph, Seth, and* others. Of these, Thomas, the 2d son, b. Dec. 17, 1771, m. Lucy Bourne May 21,1795, and d. as above; Lemuel, the 4th son, b. June 30, 1777, m. Sarah Russell dr. of Beni, of Boston and d. Aug. 1851; Joseph, the 5th son, b. May 22, 1782, d. Sept. 27, 1860; and Seth, youngest, b. May 29, 1786, m. Hannah (Tobey) Crocker, and is now the eldest of the name in town. 1 Hon. Russell Freeman’s sudden decease, from disease of heart, ex- cited general sympathy. His genial disposition, ready wit, quick perceptions, acknowledged abilities, honorable career, and warm friendships had made him widely known and*as extensively esteemed. He was some years collector of the port of New Bedford, rep. of this town, of the executive council, &c. 2 See Vol. I. 644.—On the tombstone of this excellent man is inscribed, by his direction, “ In m'eipso nihil; in Christo omne.” 3 The Perrys have been numerous in this town, and it would require a large volume to furnish even a condensed outline of the generations. From Ezra Perry are prob. descended all of the name here, and from his sons Ezra and Edward many branches widely scattered. From Ezra, s. of Ezra 1st, who m. Elizabeth Burge Feb. 12, 1651, we trace, through three gener- ations, the lineage of Elisha Sr. Esq., many years selectman, and his son Elisha Jr. Esq. mentioned above; as also by another divergence, the line of Dea. Daniel ; by others that of the numerous Johns, as also of William, Solomon, Elijah, &c. — From Edward, who m. Mary Freeman abt. 1653, the Samuels and Ebenezers, both of this town and Dartmouth. But we are compelled to economize our pp., or genealogy will trespass inordinately on the space allotted to history. 4 Mr. James Faunce from Plympton settled in this town, and his wife vol. II. 20154 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1843, Rev. Giles Pease became pastor of the Cal- vinistic society. — Capt. William Perry died June 1, aged 75. In 1845, a Universalist Society was organized in town, and a meeting-house was erected. —Mr. Silvanus Perry died Jan. 18, aged 79; Mr. Wm. Pope March 2, aged 76; and Mr. Moses Swift in Oct., aged 80.1 In 1846, difficulties led to the dismissal of Rev. Mr. Pease; his adherents formed another religious society, members of which were gathered into church estate March 21, of the following year, assuming the title “ the Puritan Church.” A meeting-house was provided, but the pastor did not continue long in his new charge. The ‘ puritans ’ in a few years became merged with other parishes, and their place of worship, after various transformations, has become a shop for useful manu- factures. Mr. John Holway d. this year, Jan. 16, ae. 67; Lt. Joseph Ful- ler, Aug. 16, 8B. 88;2 Mr. Joseph Nye, Aug. 22, ae. 75; William Fessenden Esq., Oct. 24, as. 78;8 and Mr. Elisha Gibbs, Nov. 19, a3. 78. Sarah who d. Ap. 10, 1772; he m. 2d Thankful Tobey Nov. 4, 1773, and 3d Jane Tupper June 12, 1796. Issue: Ansel who d. Ap. 15, 1772; John Sept. 16, 1774; Asa Sept. 11, 1776; Stephen Mar. 4, 1779; and William Ap. 17, 1781, who m. Mary Bourne Dec. 2, 1804, and had Dea. James H. Dec. 9, 1805, and others. 1 The lineage of Mr. S. is traced from Mr. Wm. Swift, through Wm. Jr., Ephraim b. 1656, Moses b. 1699, who m. Mary Foster Dec. 24, 1719, and Capt. Ward b. 1735, who m. Remember Tobey Jan. 9, 1755-6, and had Moses Jr. and others.—Moses Jr. m. Rebecca Nye of F. Jan. 6, 1791, and had 11 ch. * Lt. (or Capt.) Joseph Fuller was a good citizen and patriot, and b. 1758, son of Nathaniel b. Dec. 10, 1716, whose father John b. 1689 was the son of Dr. John of Barnstable. See Be. annals, for gen. of the Fullers. 3 William Fessenden Esq. was g. s. of Rev. Benj. the early minister of S. See Vol. I. 651. Educated in Boston in the office of Messrs. Green- leaf and Freeman, as a printer; after attaining majority he worked three years, at $1 per day, with John Fenno, printer to Congress, first in N. Y., then in Phila., during which time he laid by from his earnings $600; and, besides other efforts at mental improvement, read through Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire at short intervals whilst waiting for copy. Like Dr. Franklin, he was a cold-water man. After leaving the printing office, he purchased a stock of goods, and opened a store in WaterviUe, Me.; but his mother dying, he soon after sold out to the father of the presentANNALS OF SANDWICH. 155 In 1847, Rev. Elias Welles was ins. July 28 pastor of the Calvinistic Cong, church. — Mr. Jashub Wing d. this year, Feb. 25, ae. 88; Mr. Caleb Gibbs Feb. 27, ae. 82; Mr. John Bourne Mar. 11, ae. 72; Mr. Benj. Gibbs May 22, ae. 85 ; Mr. Prince Nye 1 July 17, ae. 65; and Mr. Eben. Coyil Oct. 10, ae. 92. In 1848, Mr. John Perciyal2 d. Jan. 1, ae. 78; Dr. Charles Goodspeed Mar. 30, ae. 80; Mr. Joseph Holway Ap. 5, ae. 73; and Mr. Asa Atkins Nov. 16, ae. 83. In 1849, Dr. Jonathan Leonard 3 d. Jan. 25, ae. 86; Col. Na- Hon. Geo. Evans his stock in trade, and returning to his native place bought out the interest of the co-heirs of the paternal estate, and opened a store and inn in Sandwich. A gentleman of more than ordinary intelligence, of quick perceptions, of established principles, and kindly feelings, his course through life was marked with strict integrity, and insured him great con- fidence and high esteem. His sound judgment, business sagacity, and industry, secured to him a large property. Official station had in his view no attractions, or he might have enjoyed much more of public favor than he reluctantly received. Few men have been so prompt in business, so un- tiringly active and successful, and yet have passed so much time in the quiet enjoyment of home. His last years were blessed with unclouded Christian hope. The portrait we present, through the courtesy of his eldest son, Stephen Fessenden Esq., is faithful. He is said to nave borne a strong resemblance to Hon. Fisher Ames, for whom in the more active portion of his life he was frequently mistaken, and for whom he entertained a high respect. 1 Mr. N. b. Aug. 29,1781, was s. of Peter b. 1745, who was s. of Nathan b. 1722, who was s. of Nathan who m. Dorothy Bryant Ap. 12,1715. Brs. of Peter were Peleg 1743; Nathan 1747-8, f. of Edw., Simeon, and Dr. Shadrach; and Nathl. 1752, the f. of Thos. S., Nathl., and Abra. W. — The descendants of Mr. Benj. Nye, the ancestor, are very numerous, and prob. to be found in every State of the Union. John and Ebenr., sons of Benj. 1st, were the first settlers in N. Falm. John, s. of 1st John, b. Nov. 22, 1675, was co-purchaser with Edm. Freeman of 1000 acres in 1702 at Windham, Ct. Jona. and Caleb, sons of Benj. 1st, are numerously repre- sented, as also Nathan Sr. 2 James was the first of the name in town, and had James Jan. 18, 1671; and Eliza. Sept. 10,1675. — James, of S., m. Abigail Robinson Feb. 18, 1695-6. He had prob. John Oct. 17, 1706; and Timo. Oct. 2, 1712. Mr. Savage says James went to Haddam, Ct.—Mr. John, above, s. of Benj. who was s. of John by w. Lydia. — See Barnstable. 3 See Vol. I. 611, 612. — It was intended to give brief mention of all who have been settled in the town, as regular practitioners of medicine, from its settlement to the present; but we find it impracticable — unless, peradven- ture, the few we may here name were all, with the exception of those whose stay was very transitory. In the early times of the colony, physicians were not numerous; and such as were in the practice were remotely scattered— their professional visits often reaching great distances in emergencies. The inhabitants seem to have relied ordinarily on good nursing and an intuitive perception of the requisite treatment; perhaps adopting, in effect, the an- cient adage, “ the best physicians are cheerfulness, rest, and diet; ” or, as the Latins have it, “Si tibi deficiant medici, medici tibifiant hcec tria: mens Iceta, requies, moderata diceta.” It may be remarked, however, that in early times a good education embraced an extent of reading that gave to varied156 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. than B. Gibbs 1 Mar. 10, se. 66; Mr. Ezra Tobey June 27, se. 52; and Mr. Thos. Fessenden Dec. 29, ae. 77. In 1851, Mr. Jonathan Bourne 2 d. Feb. 22, ae. 83; Mr. Ste- phen Holway Mar. 24, ae. 76; Gideon Hawley Esq. in May, ae. 84; Mr. Thos. S. Nye June 2, ae. 67; Mr. Josiah Meiggs Sept. 10, ae. 70; Mr. Stephen Holway Jr. Nov. 22, ae. 53; and Mr. Melatiah Tobey8 Nov. 28, ae. 86. professions some knowledge of the diagnosis of disease and the principles of the healing art; especially were the clergy, who were required by law to be educated men, more or less skilled in medical practice. Some of these were regularly educated as physicians as well as clergymen, and through life associated the two professions.—The first person known in the practice of medicine in the town of Sandwich, was Rev. Benj. Fessenden in 1722; the next was Dr. Thomas Smith in 1739; then Dr. Eldad Tupper about 1740; Dr. Benj. Bourne and Dr. Thos. Smith Jr. abt. 25 yrs. after; then, soon, Dr. Nathaniel Freeman ; Dr. Jonathan Leonard abt. 1790; Dr. Jonathan O. Freeman, at a later period; long subsequent, Dr. Bart. Cushman ; and later, Drs. Ivory H. Lucas, James B. Forsyth, James Ayres, Jona. Bemis, John Batchelder, Henry Russell, and, may be, others whose stay was even more transient than that of some of the last named, — leaving Drs. John Harpur and Jonathan Leonard Jr. to the present time in possession of the chief practice. — So far as is known, the disciples of EsCulapius in this town have practised upon the principles of the good Samaritan, and may have felt as the celebrated Boerhaave ex- pressed himself, “ The poor are good patients, for God is their paymaster.” —We may not now depart from our general rule of action in writing what should stand as history, in speaking of the living; but of the one now longest in practice here and to whom the public is much indebted for the interest he has taken in the cause of education, whilst his professional merits are highly and justly appreciated, we may safely and truly write, “ Fir omni doctrina atque optimarum artium studiis eruditus;” and to the other, it is just commendation to say, “Patrissas! patris est jilius.” 1 Col. Gibbs, s. of Silvanus, was b. Sept. 27,1783, m. Salome Dillingham dr. of Edward, Sept. 16, 1804, and was f. of Nathan B. now of Boston, b. May 26, 1806, who m. Adeline Burgess dr. of Benj. Esq., Sept. 23, 1830. Col. B. was a prominent and estimable citizen. 2 Mr. B. was descended from Mr. Richard, through Elisha of 1641, who m. Patience dr. of Mr. Jas. Skiff Oct. 26, 1675, and had Nathan Aug. 31, 1676, who m. Mary dr. of Col. Wm. Bassett Feb. 3,1697-8, and had Jona- than Jan. 21, 1702-3, who m. Hannah Dillingham of Harwich Oct. 14, 1725, and had Elisha Nov. 29, 1733, who m. Joanna Nye June 2, 1757.— Mr. Jonathan Bourne, above, son of the last named, m. Hannah Tobey Mar. 31, 1791, and was father of a large family, the 8th of whom is the present Jonathan Bourne Esq. of New Bedford who discovers a regard for his natal place by still keeping up the ancient homestead in this towrn. 3 From Mr. Thomas Tobey who was in town early, with 2 drs., and who m. 2d Martha, dr. of Geo. Knot, Nov. 18, 1650, and had Thomas Dec. 8, 1651, a multitude has descended. From one of these, Thomas, who settled in Yarm., now Dennis, are many. From Samuel who d. Sept. 22,1737, were by his w. Abia, Joanna May 22, 1697, who m. Benj. Spooner of Dart. Nov. 29, 1716; Cornelius Sept. 12, 1699; Tabitha Nov. 9, 1701, who m. Joseph Freeman May 9, 1726; Zaccheus Jan. 14, 1703-4; Ruth Sept. 8, 1706; Jona. May 13, 1709; Eliakim Oct. 19, 1711; Sami. May 8, 1715; Thos. Aug. 14, 1720; and Elisha 1723.—Cornelius was the g. f. of theANNALS OF SANDWICH. 157 In 1852, among the records of mortality are the deaths of William Handy Esq. February 8, aged about 90Mr. SAM- above Melatiah, whose f. Cornelius Jr. m. Lois Pope Feb. 1,1756, and d. Oct. 8, 1778.—The descendants of Zaccheus who m. Sarah Pope Jan. 1, 1726-7 were soon found generally in Dartmouth; as also of Jonathan Jr. b. 1709, who m. Abigl. Lewis Dec. 7,1732.—Eliakim who m. Abigl. Bassett Jr. Ap. 17,1740, had Sami, who went to Fairfield; Wm.; Lucy; Wm. who m. Hannah Crocker Mar. 12,1778, and had Grace Oct. 5, 1778, who m. Heman Bursley; Abigail Dec. 15, 1783, who m. Col. Obed B. Nye; Lydia Ap. 5, 1790, who d. early; and Jona. Burr May 30, 1794.—Rev. Saml., b. 1715, grad. H. C. 1733, was 1st minister of Berkley 1737, and d. Feb. 13, 1781. By m. with Bathsheba Crocker of Be. he had a large family, the 2d s. of which was Judge Samuel b. June 5, 1743, “ an eminent man,” the f. of Apollos Esq. late of N. B. — Thomas, 6th s. of 1st Samuel, m. Eliz. Swift Feb. 27, 1740-1, and had Silvanus, Thos., and Seth.—Dr. Elisha grad. H. C. 1743, m. Desire Newcomb Jan. 12, 1746, and d. at Acushnet May 10, 1781. — Another branch from Thomas 1st is through Gershom who m. 1st Mehit. Fish 1697 and 2d Hannah Nye 1728, and had, among others, Silas, Ephm., Gershom, &c. — From Ephm. 1711, was Elisha, Jesse, George, and Benj., the latter of whom b. Jan. 11, 1747-8, m. Zerviah Fish Aug. 4, 1774, and had Hepzibeth who m. David Fearing; Curtis the father of Joshua; and Abigail who d. young.—Joshua, s. of Cornelius, m. Maria Tobey Nov. 12, 1752, and had a family of which was Lemuel who went to Portland. 1 Capt. William Handy was, in some respects, a remarkable man. During the revolutionary period, at a time when it was most difficult to obtain men for the war, he volunteered and served in several campaigns. He was present at the execution of Andre, a scene the incidents of which he related at the very close of life, not only with nice accuracy but with an exhibition of fine sensibilities and generous feeling. Endowed with an iron constitu- tion, of good judgment and most determined will — fearless, resolute, and full of energy, his earlier life was chiefly devoted to maritime pursuits — first in the merchant service, and then whaling. After one whale voyage as mate, he was for many years in command of some of the best and most successful ships engaged in that business, making repeated voyages from New Bedford, and also from Dunkirk in France in pursuance of an arrange- ment made first by Tupper with Bonaparte when First Consul and after- wards by Rotch with the Consul as Emperor. Captain Handy’s ability, integrity, and success were proverbial, securing unlimited confidence. Retiring from the seas, he engaged still in maritime affairs, establishing a ship-yard near his house on Buzzard’s Bay and becoming largely a ship- . owner. He sent forth from his own yard the ship Rebecca, the brig Fame, schooners Resolution, Nancy, Sophronia, Love, Achsah Parker, and sloops Betsy, Nancy, Deborah, and other smaller vessels designed for the Long Island Sound trade during the war of 1812. These last smaller vessels were, for greater security against the ravages of the enemy, built near his door at a distance from the shore, and then without great difficulty launched across fields to their intended element. Capt. H. suffered greatly from French spoliations, as well as from the war of 1812 ; but cherished faith in the tardy justice of his country to the very last of life. When more than 60 years old he resolved, to replenish his coffers and “ to show the boys how to take whales,” to adventure one more voyage. His purpose was no N sooner known in New Bedford than eminent merchants and ship-owners were ready to further his views. Put in command of the Com. Decatur in 1821, he accomplished in 15 months a most successful cruise to the admi- ration of alL He had an utter repugnance to public life, and yet was elected Selectman, and commissioned as Jus. Pac. Anecdotes might be related of158 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. uel Adams aged 80; and Captain Barnabas Nye Novem- ber 6, aged 85.1 In 1853, the Rev. Mr. Welles, pastor of the Calvinistic church and society, deceased after a pastorate of about six years; and Rev. P. C. Headly was settled in charge the following April. Mr. Daniel Wing d. Jan. 5, ae. 74; Capt. Freeman Gibbs 2 Jan. 23, ae. 64; Mr. Levi Swift Mar. 8, ae. 75; Mr. Nathaniel Burgess Ap. 27, ae. 74; Mr. John Jones3 July 7, ae. 53; Mr. him, were a work of this kind the place, showing the energy and daring of the man $ and one, had we room for it in full, would be of thrilling interest — that of a rencontre by himself and one other with a white polar bear, engaged upon the ice and snows without firearms. The contest was des- perate ; but the bear weighing more than 500 lbs. labored under the disad- vantage of breaking through the snow-crust, whilst his assailants were sup- ported by it and finally conquered. He d. aged 89 : 5 : 24, and was of one of the branches of the name descending from John b. 1677, who m. Kezia Wing Nov. 14, 1704, and had Cornelius May 9, 1704-5 ; Zaccheus Jan. 16, 1708 ; John Jan. 24, 1714 ; Thankful Feb. 27, 1716, who m. Seled Landers Dec. 5, 1751, who was pioneer to Yarm., N. Scotia; and Jonathan Oct. 6, 1719. — John, b. 1714, m. Kezia Eldred of F. Mar. 6, 1745-6, and 2d Eliza. Garrett Oct. 10, 1758, and had Chloe Mar. 9, 1746-7, who m. Lot Crowell of F. Feb. 20, 1772 ; Paul Feb. 9, 1748-9, who d. inf.; John Nov. 19, 1751 who m. Eliza. Ewer May 10, 1774, and went to Saratoga Co., N. Y.; Paul June 19, 1758 who with most of his family removed West; Kezia who m. Ichabod Burgess and removed to Maine; Temperance who d. ae. 15 ; William Aug. 15, 1762; Delia who m. Cornelius Sherman and went to Rochester; Eliza, who m. Josiah Gifford Aug. 17, 1789, and 2d Nathaniel Freeman 1799 ; Lot who was drowned in Boston Bay Ap. 26, 1792 ; and Achsah who m. James Thacher Jr. of Y. Ap. 14,1794 and removed to Vas- salboro,. — Capt. William, b. 1762, m. Love Swain dr. Danl. of Nantucket Aug. 25, 1796, and had Betsy May 11, 1797 who m. Sami. Nye of F. 1820; Achsah June 22, 1799 who m. Calvin Parker 1822; William Sept. 29, 1801 who m. Elizabeth Freeman 1831 and 2d Mary Vickery 1848; Lewis Sept. 23, 1803 who m. Fanny Brett 1828; Love Nov. 12, 1804 who m. Wm. Hewins 1826; John Aug. 17, 1706 who m. Phebe Nye; Nancy F. Mar. 9, 1809 who m. Martin EUis 1829; Joseph S. Sept. 25, 1810; and Joshua Nov. 9, 1813 who m. Dorothy A. Hathaway 1840. — Other branches from Richard, Jonathan, Hannibal, Isaac, &c. are numerous and widely scattered — too numerous to be here mentioned. 1 Capt. Nye, b. Mar. 4, 1768 and d. ae. 84: 8: 2, was son of Barnabas who m. Deborah Tobey July 12, 1763 and d. at Acushnet July 24, 1813, ae. 79. 2 Capt G. was s. of Benj., and a very successful ship-master. It would occupy too much space to enlarge, as we would wish, the genealogies of the families of this name. Mr. Thomas Gibbs (who Mr. Savage thinks was bro. of Samuel also of Sandwich) was in town early. He d. in 1685, ae. 80. His children were Thos. b. Mar. 25, 1636; Samuel June 23, 1639; John Sept. 12, 1644; Sarah Ap. 11, 1652 who m. Ebenr. Nye Dec. 17, 1675; Job and Betia, gem., Ap. 15, 1655; and Mary Aug. 12, 1657. The descendants in this town have been numerous, as also those widely dispersed. 3 See Barnstable and Falmouth.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 159 Perez Burgess Sept. 10, ae. 67; and Mr. Thomas Perry Dec. 30, *e. 74. In 1854, Mr. Solomon Perry d. Jan. 1, ae. 80; Mr. Samuel Wing1 Feb. 24, ae. 80; Mr. Alyin Swift Mar. 2, ae. 71; Capt. Pelham Gibbs Mar. 3, ae. 87; Mr. Francis Jones, ae. 73; Shadrach Freeman Esq.2 June 13, ae. 84; and Rev. Phineas Fish June 16. 1 Mr. John Wing, the ancestor, was of the earliest settlers. His wife was Deborah, dr. of Rev. Steph. Bachelor; and they brought with them sons Daniel, John and Stephen. — John went to Yarm. in 1648. See Y.— Daniel, who d. 1658-9, admin, by John 1659, m. Hannah Swift, dr. Jno., 1641, and had Hannah July 28, 1642; Lydia May 23, 1647 ; Sami. Aug. 28, 1652; Hepzibeth Nov. 7, 1654 ; John Nov. 14, 1656 ; and Beulah Nov. 16, 1658. — Stephen m. Oseah Dillingham 1646-7, and 2d Sarah Briggs 7:11: 1654, and had Ephraim Ap. 21, 1649; Mercy Nov. 13, 1650; Stephen Sept. 2, 1656; Sarah Feb. 5, 1658; John Sept. 25, 1661; Abigail May 1, 1664; Ebenezer 11: 5: 1671; and Matthias 1: 1: 1673.— The numerous families descended from these, seem now, in different branches, so remotely distinct that their common origin is recognized by few. They have generally been highly respectable and valuable members of society. — We must make our gen. notice more brief than we had desired — not for the want of data, but because these are forbidding by their multitude. 8 Shadrach Freeman Esq. was in lineal descent from the 1st Edgi. Freeman, and of that branch at the head of which was the 3d s. of Edm. ancTSarah, viz.: John, b. 1693, who m. Deliverance Lawrence July 20, 1720 ; 2d Maria Bourne Jan. 3,1722-3 who d. Jan. 18,1726, and 3d Mary Perry Aug. 4, 1726 and d. June 22, 1762. Issue: John; Mary who m. Jona. Bassett Nov. 19, 1748 ; Seth Feb. 22, 1732; James who d. Aug. 20, 1737 ; and Samuel Sept. 21, 1736.,— Of the preceding, John, the eldest, m. Deborah Nye June 23, 1748 and had Maria Nov. 21, 1749 who m. Moses Keene Dec. 15, 1768; Elisha Sept. 9, 1750 who m. Nancy Brown July 21, 1774 and removed to Middleboro’; Sarah Feb. 14, 1752 who m. Elisha Perry Esq. Sept. 13, 1774; Joseph Mar. 9,1756; Wm. July 5,1759; and, removing to Mid., had also John; Nathan ; and Martin. — Seth Esq., b. 1732, m. Experience Hatch of Pembroke Ap. 19, 1759 and d. July 19, 1812 ae. 81. His wid. d. Jan. 27, 1820 se. 80. They had Phebe Dec. 31, 1759 who m. Clark Swift Aug. 16, 1789 ; Mary Ap. 17, 1761 who m. Zenas Nye Feb. 10, 1785 ; John Nov. 15, 1762 ; James July 17, 1764 ; Anna Mar. 11, 1766 whom. Joseph Swift; Seth June 10,1768 ; Shadrach Ap. 21,1770; Experience Dec. 17, 1771 who m. Watson Freeman Nov. 10,1794; Abigail Oct. 6, 1774 who d. 1775; Deliverance June 22, 1775 who m. Gid. Baty May 25, 1797 and d. Sept. 7, 1848, having been left a wid. Oct. 16, 1826; and Betsy July 16, 1778 who d. inf. — Samuel, b. 1736, m. Abigail Dil- lingham Ap. 9, 1761, 2d Achsah Crocker who d. in Hallowell Oct. 14,1802 whither her husband removed in 1800, and 3d Rebecca wid. of Danl. Jack- son Sept. 1803. His chil. were Abigail May 2, 1763; Mary Nov. 9, 1764 who m. Capt. John Pope Sept. 29, 1785 ; Sami. Oct. 7, 1766 who d. Aug. 15, 1845; Deborah Mar. 5, 1769 who m. Lem. Tobey ; Edward May 7, 1772 who m. Esther Nye May 17, 1795 and removed toJMe. Where he d. Dec. 14, 1820; Ebenr. who was drowned in S. mill-pond when a youth; and Ebenr. Aug. 28, 1788. —Col. John, b. 1762, was a remarkable man — some years a ship-master successfully trading with France, whose acts of daring and energy of will might furnish many anecdotes of interest. He was also a soldier in the rev. war. He m. Eliza. (Swift) Barlow, wid. of Nathan, Dec. 4, 1796 and d. June 8, 1828 without issue. —Hon. James, b. 1764, was drowned in Vineyard Sound, the boat in which he attempted to160 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. An unadvised attempt was made this year by a young clergyman from abroad, in transient and hasty visits, to organize a society for the purpose of sustain* mg the services of the Protestant Episcopal Church;1 pass over from Falmouth to Holmes Hole on urgent duty as sheriff getting entangled with ice, in severe cold. Amaziah Wilcox and Ansel Dimmick of F. were with and aiding him, but all perished Jan. 10, 1816. Sheriff F. was a man of great boldness and energy. By his m. 1st with Joanna Butler of F., and 2d Eliza. Carnes of Boston, he had Eliza. Oct. 20, 1790 who m. Dea. Sami. Nye Sept. 4, 1828; John Sept. 2, 1792 who d. in Batavia Mar. 1820 ; Joanna B. Dec. 10, 1794 ; James M. Aug. 6, 1798 who d. an officer U. S. N. Nov. 16, 1820 on the coast of Africa; Seth B. Mar. 31, 1800 who d. June 24, 1811; Shadrach Jr. Nov. 30, 1801 who m. Eliza. P. Swift July 23, 1829 and d. Feb. 20, 1838; Experience H. Mar. 14, 1803 who m. Capt. Isaac Gibbs Sept. 23, 1827; Francis H. Aug. 6, 1805 who set. in W. N. Y.; and Abigail W. June 26,1808wrhom. Capt. Roland Gibbs June 23,1828.*— Capt. Seth Jr., b. 1768, m. Maria Nye Ap. 27,1797 and d. Oct. 28, 1824. Issue: Charles H. Aug. 3, 1798 who m. Pamelia Davis of F. 1829 and in 1840 removed to Brimfield, II., where he d. Sept. 11, 1859 leaving a family; Hannah B. Aug. 9, 1800 who m. Benaiah Leonard of Wareham; Anne M. S. Feb. 7, 1803 who m. Clifton Wing of Roch.; Fanny E. Aug. 19, 1805 who m. Hiram Barrows of W.; Seth Jr., Mar. 12, 1808 who went in 1840 to Ottawa, II.; and Nathan N. Aug. 30, 1810 who m. Caroline Swift Sept. 4, 1834, went to II., and died in Peoria 1837. — Shadrach Esq., b. 1770, m. Sarah Freeman, dr. of Hon. Nathl., Mar. 22, 1795. They left no issue. He was a practical farmer, and filled various public offices. 1 It was stated at the time in a religious publication that this was the first instance of the performance of the services of the Ep. Ch. in this town; and the statement copied into other journals was permitted, though wide from the truth, to pass unrebuked. Stated services had been held years before, the holy communion regularly administered and baptismal, marriage, and funeral rites performed. A Rt. Rev. Bishop had also repeat- edly officiated here. Such services had been, however, with no view of establishing another parish in a place where the religious community was already inconveniently cut up into divers sects ; but for the especial benefit of the Sandwich Collegiate Institute and the members of the communion con- nected with it. These services were open to all who desired to attend, and numbers availed themselves of the opportunity; but no thought was had of distracting other worshipping assemblies. — It may here be noted that there was no attempt made during the first two hundred years of the set- tlement of the county, to introduce into any part of it, as a permanency, the Episcopal mode of worship and order although there were at different periods individuals and families of high position (especially among the Gorhams, Bournes, and Otises) whose preferences lay in that direction. The fact is worthy of preservation inasmuch as it corroborates the claim of the Church that its policy has never been a proselyting one. The instruc- tions of * the Soc. for Prop, the Gospel in Foreign Parts/ May 29, 1735, were that its “ ministers are as little as may be to meddle with any matters of controversy, but only to preach and administer the sacraments according to the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England.” The assertion of Douglas in his Summary, that there were to be “ no pulpit invectives against religious sects,” is also to the point—an important admission. Nor does the reason which he assigns for it at all detract from its value:ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 161 but such as might naturally, from their position, have been supposed the strongest friends of Episcopacy, were neither advising nor consulted in regard to the move- ment. It soon fell through, as from the manner of its inception was foreseen.1 In 1855, Mr. William Atkins d. Feb. 3, ae. 80; Capt. Thomas Burgess2 Ap. 14, ae. 73; Dea. Thomas Hamblin® May 4, ae. 80; Mr. Barnabas Holway4 May 5, ae. 78 ; Mr. Lemuel Fish June 8, ae. 94; Mr. Barzillai Weeks Aug. 12, ae. 87; Mr. William Lohing Aug. 29, ae. 54; Mr. Theodore Fish 5 Nov. 26, ae. 77; and Mr. James Tobey Dec. 15, ae. 78. In 1856, Rev. Mr. Headly had retired from the min- istry in the Calvinistic church; and, some time subse- quent, Rev. William Caruthers became pastor; but the ministry of this parish being like that of others in town, subject to frequent changes, it is inexpedient to attempt to pursue its history farther. — The First parish, or Unitarian society, has long exhibited similar instability, depending on occasional supplies. — The " that, as Dr. Swift humorously expresses it, their religious zeal having no vent by their tongues, may be turned into the proper channel of an exem- plary life.” 1 Rev. W. W. Sever, as missionary under the direction of the Diocesan Board, officiated here a short time, after the aforesaid organization “ of the new parish ” was said to be effected by “ the self-denying labors ” of another; and we are sure that it was no fault of this amiable gentleman that the enterprise did not prosper. 2 Capt. B. m. Patty Wing Dec. 2, 1804. He was s. of Ichabod who m. Kezia Handy, and g. s. of Joseph, youngest s. of Thomas 1st. 3 Dea. H. m. Sylvia Nye Sept. 28, 1797. He was s. of Thos. who m. Olive Fish Oct. 20, 1774, and had Thomas Oct. 14, 1775. See Be. and Falm. 4 Mr. H. was s. of Barnabas and Elizabeth. He had brs. Stephen b. 1775 who m. Reliance Allen Oct. 4, 1797, and had Stephen and others; and John 1781 who m. 1st, Rhoda Allen Oct. 1, 1802. Through Gideon who m. Experience Wing May 26,1732, and Joseph and Anne, and Joseph Jr. son of Joseph and Rose, they are traced to the first of the name who was in town 1637 and who d. 1647 and whose name is, on the records, sometimes Holly. 5 Mr. F. was son of John who m. 1st, Sabra Chadwick of F. Dec. 8, 1763, and 2d, Amy Howes of F. May 22, 1791, and had Mercy who m. Nathl. Howland; Ephraim June 25, 1776 who m. 1st, Bethia Chadwick of F. Oct. 10, 1799 ; Chloe who m. Sami. Fish of F.; Theodore ; Temperance who m. Ansel Chadwick May 8, 1788 ; Isaiah who m. Chloe Hamblin Nov. 24, 1803; and Jesse who m. Sarah Gallison of Be. YOL. II. 21162 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Congregational society at Monument has not at any time had a clergyman permanently settled.—The Bap- tists, at Pocasset, have never been numerous, or well established. — The Umversalists have ceased to open their doors for regular worship. — The Friends continue as formerly, but with diminished numbers; their young people often, more than in times past, failing to be “ owned as members of Society;” and, whether because their peculiar discipline is unfavorable to increase as a sect, or for other reasons, their numbers do not augment by “ light breaking forth ” whereby many of “the world” are “convinced.” — The Republican Meth- odists (or may be the Reformed, or perhaps Protestant is the last and present designation) now support stated preaching.—The Protestant Episcopal Methodists hold their course onward with an energy that betokens zeal and increasing success; their system of rotation, what- ever inconveniences may attend it, probably contribut- ing to • their increase.— St. Peter’s Church, Roman Cath- olic — the necessity for which was created by the influx of population consequent on the establishment of the Glass-works in this town about 1825, has pursued its way quietly and unostentatiously; and, for the last twelve years under the charge of Rev. William Moran, “ Vir mitis, biandus, d gratia dignus” has continued to exert, as is generally conceded, a salutary influence upon society. Mr. Timothy Tobey died this year, Jan. 26, as. 90;1 2 Mr. Saml. Blossom Jan. 27, se. 74;2 Mr. Henby Bourne Feb. 13, ae. 61 ;3 1 Mr. Tobey, b. Sept. 19, 1765, was s. of Joseph b. Sept. 22, 1728, who was s. of Nathan b. Sept. 28, 1701, who was s. of Nathan 1st. He m. 1st, Patience Fish Jan. 18, 1795, and had a large family. 2 See Blossom gen. in annals of Be. 3 Mr. Henry Bourne was des. from Mr. Richard who d. 1682, through Elisha, Nathan, and Thomas. The latter, b. 1716, m. Mary Randal of Scit. Nov. 26, 1747, and had William June 29,1754 who m. Martha Perry July 25, 1793 and had Henry, above, Jan. 22, 1795. — From Thomas, s. of Nathan, was a large number of brothers, noted citizens, viz.: Nathan, Lemuel, Ansel, Samuel, Asa, Bethuel, and Thomas.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 163 Mr. Joseph Hoxie,1 s. of Barnabas, Feb. 22, ae. 91 ; Mr. Charles Bourne Mar. 27, ae. 81; Mr. Nymphas Handy Ap. 20, ae. 81; Mr. Joseph Nye, s. of Joseph Esq. May 6, ae. 82 ; Seth F. Nye Esq. Sept. 13, ae. 65; and Mr. Same. Fessenden, s. of Sami., Oct. 18, ae. 80. In 1857, Mr. Hezekiah Hoxie2 died March 26, ae. 89; and Mr. Joshua Arey3 July 7, ae. 97. In 1858, Mr. Alden Allen 4 died Jan. 8, ae. 80; Mr. Ezra Dil- lingham 5 Jan. 22, ae. 67 ; Mr. Edmund Freeman Jr.6 Feb. 8, ae. ! Mr. Hoxie, b. Dec. 2, 1765, m. Deborah Wing, dr. of Paul, and .had Sami. W., Hepzibeth W., Joseph, Abigail W., and Newell. His father was Barnabas who m. Hannah Gilford Dec. 11, 1755 and had Gideon, Lodo- wick, Kezia, Christina, Joseph, Mercy, Chloe, and Mary. The line is traced back next to Joseph who m. Mary Clark Jan. 16,1723-4; then to Gideon ; then to Lodowick. 2 He was s. of Peleg and Mary, his precise age being 88 : 6 : 22. By his w. Bathsheba, he had Peleg Mar. 25,1798 ; Solomon Jan. 9,1800 ; Heze- kiah July 18, 1802; Sarah July 21, 1804; Obadiah D. June 6, 1809; Bath- sheba May 26, 1812 ; James Ap. 17, 1814; and Caroline July 20, 1816. 3 Mr. Arey came to this town from Harwich; and his descendants, for some reason or fancy, now call themselves Avery. He had a large family. 4 Mr. Allen, b. Feb. 23, 1778, s. of William who m. Rosanna Swift, and g. s. of Geo. who m. Rebecca Spooner, and g. g. s. of Cornelius by by his 2d w. Dorothy, is thus traced back through Daniel of 1663, and Geo. Jr., to Geo. Sr. who d. 1648. — Mr. George Allen the ancestor we have noticed in former pp. His son George Jr. had by his wife Hannah, Caleb June 24, 1648 who m. Eliza. Sisson Ap. 8, 1670; Judah Jan. 14, 1650-1; Ephm. Jan. 14, 1652-3; Eliza. Jan. 20, 1654-5 ; and by his w. Sarah had Matthew June 16, 1657; James and John, gem., Aug. 5, 1658; Lydia May 1660 ; Daniel May 23,1663 ; Hannah May 15,1666 ; Ebenr. 9: 3 : 1668; and George June 20, 1672. — Matthew, another s. of Geo. 1st, m. Sarah Kerby and removed to Dartm. — Henry went to Milford, Ct. 1660, and d. at Stratford 1690, leaving a large family. — William m. Pris- cilla Brown Mar. 21, 1649, but had no issue. — James d. July 25, 1714 at Tisbury, leaving a large family. — Francis m. Mary Barlow July 20, 1662 and had a family. —Ralph had Jedediah Jan. 3, 1646-7 ; Experience Mar. 14, 1651; Ephm. Mar. 26, 1656; and others. — The families in successive generations have been highly respectable, but so numerous that it is impos- sible to find place for them here. 5 Killed by a fall from a horse, leaving a family. He was s. of John 3d who m. Zervia Crocker and had Elizabeth Mar. 23, 1773 who m. Capt. Benj. Nason May 9, 1802 ; Zervia Aug. 17,1775 who m. Lt. Joseph Hamblin Feb. 8, 1798; Achsah Aug. 17, 1777 ; Crocker Jan. 5, 1780; James Mar. 19, 1782 who m. in Bordeaux and settled in Fr.; Lucia June 16, 1784 who m. John Bassett; Ebenr. Oct. 24,1786 ; and Ezra Nov. 23,1789 mentioned above. This branch trace through John 1710, and Edward, and Henry, to Edward Sr. who d. 1667. 6 Mr. F. was of the branch from Thomas b. 1696, s. of Edmund Free- man and Sarah, and late in life m. Kezia Hoxie Nov. 23, 1742 and d. Oct. 1775 ae. 79, and had Edm. Oct. 10, 1743 ; Gideon Ap. 13, 1745 who “ removed up country; ” Joseph June 1746 who m. Eliza. Wing Aug. 18, 1768 and went. taMe.; and Lodowick Oct. 27, 1747. — Edmund, the eldest of these, m. Tabitha Chase Mar. 14, 1765 and d. 1778, 8 m. before the birth of his youngest. He had Samuel 3d July 7, 1765 who m. Fear Atkins Aug. 16, 1795 and d. abt. 1829 ; Thomas Jr. Ap. 6, 1767 who m. Betsy Fish Mar. 11, 1802 and d. July 29, 1841; Kezia May 6, 1769; Mary May 25,164 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. 52; Capt. Ansel Fish1 Oct. IT, ae. 83; and Mr. Joseph Hoxie,2 son of Cornelius, May 27, ae. 83. In 1859, Mr. Geo. Atkins 3 d. June 3, ae. 59; Capt. Abner Ellis Aug. 25, ae. 72; Mr. Silas Gifford4 Sept. 7,ae. 76; and Mr. Jon- athan E. Chipman 5 Sept. 24, ae. 56. 1771; Josiah Jan. 28, 1773 who removed to Yt.; Nathan who removed to N. York ; and Edmund Ap. 9, 1779 who m. Lucy Churchill and has had John C. June 20, 1805; Edm. Jr. Oct. 6, 1806 mentioned above; Josiah Aug. 13, 1808 who d. Oct. 14, 1832; Lucy A. Dec. 7, 1814; and Mary T. Jan. 13, 1820. 1 Capt. F. {Anselm on the record of births) was s. of Nathl. and Abigail who had Chipman May 29, 1771; Prince May 24, 1773 ; Anselm Feb. 11, 1776 ; Mahala July 17, 1779 who m. Joseph Nye; Braddock June 14, 1783 ; and Nancy June 7, 1786.—The lines of descent of those who bear the name are multiplied ; but in some of the branches are those who prefer to write the name Fisher, thus discarding the origin from the old Saxon family of Fisch which in the tables of the German nobility dates from a remote period.—The descendants from John and Nathaniel, early settlers, are numerous ; as are also those from Jonathan their brother who left S. in 1654 and went to L. I., from whom is Gov. Hamilton Fish of N. York. 2 Mr. Joseph Hoxie, b. Jan. 7, 1777, was s. of Cornelius and Martha, and g. s. of Joseph and Mary, and g. g. s. of Gideon and Grace, and thus descended from Lodowick who m. Mary Presbury 1664. 3 Mr, James Atkins was first of the name on the town records. By his w. Margaret he had William July 2, 1690 ; Hannah Dec. 17, 1692; Expe- rience Feb. 16, 1694-5 ; John Ap. 14, 1699; Eliza. July 29, 1701; and Thos. Aug. 18, 1703. — John m. Dinah Gifford Feb. 13, 1728-9 and had James Mar. 18, 1730; John June 1, 1732 ; Thos. Ap. 3, 1734; Wm. Dec. 18, 1736 ; Benj. July 25, 1739 ; Hannah Nov. 26, 1741 who m. Nathl. Blackwell Feb. 19, 1767; Nathl. July 30, 1744 who m. Betty Blackwell Feb. 18, 1767; and David June 4, T7T7.— James m. Content Landers Oct. 23, 1760 and had John Ap. 9, 1762; James May 4, 1764 who m. Hannah Nye May 25, 1790 ; Asa Ap. 19, 1766 ; Fear Oct. 29, 1769 who m. Sami. Freeman Aug. 10, 1795 ; Stephen Mar. 21, 1772; Wm. Dec. 4, 1774; Ansel Dec. 22, 1778; and Eliza. May 19,1781. — Thomas, b. 1734, m. Ruth Snow of Roch. Jan. 4, 1759-60 and had Eliza., Wm., Marg., and Ruth.— William, b. 1774, and d. Feb. 3,1855 had a large fam. of which was George mentioned above, b. Feb. 22, 1800. The name is more frequent in the lower towns of the Cape. 4 Mr. John Gifford (in the rec. Gif art) was early in town, and had Eliza. 12 : 25: 1664-5 ; Samuel Mar. 12, 1666; John June 12, 1668; Mary Oct. 9, 1669 ; Grace Aug. 7, 1671; Wm. 7:3: 1673; Yelverton Ap. 22, 1676 ; and Josiah Feb. 27, 1681. — Samuel m. Jane Loring Nov. 2, 1699 and had Josiah Feb. 12, 1700-1, by a 2d w. Joanna, the first having d. Ap. 14, 1699-1700. — John m. Desire Sprague Nov. 24, 1696.—William m. Eliza. Wheaton Mar. 13, 1701-2, and had Benj. Aug. 20, 1703; Nathan Feb. 16, 1704-5 ; and Elizabeth May 31, 1710. — Josiah m. Mercy Chad- wick Mar. 11, 1714-15, and had Rhoda Feb. 17, 1715-16; John May 2, 1717 ; Abigail Oct. 8,1718 ; Samuel Feb. 10, 1720-1; Christopher Nov. 22, 1722; Hannah Jan. 29, 1726-7; and Benj. June 14, 1732. — Another name is early on the records, viz.: that of Mr. William Gifford who had Christopher, July, 1658. The name was early identified with Falmouth also ; and we defer further notice until we come to the annals of that town. 5 Mr. John Chipman, the ancestor, who d. in this town Ap. 7,1708, was born in 1615 as is to be inferred from his saying in 1652 “ It is 21ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 165 In 1860, Mr. Thos. F. Gibbs 1 d. Feb. 4, ae. 67; Mr. Ellis Swift Feb. 11, ae. 73; Hon. Elisha Pope Mar. 8, ae. 79; Mr. Benj. Black- well 2 May 27, ae. 77; Mr. Abner Bowman Aug. 26, ae. 76; Mr. Jos. H. Pope Sept. 27, ae. 78; and Mr. Gershom Ellis 3 Nov. 18, ae. 84. In 1861, Mr. Lemuel Ewer4 d. Mar. 12, ae. 86; Mr. Joshua Wing5 Ap. 5, ae. 80; Mr. Moses Nye Ap. 28, ae. 92; and Mr. Peleg Lawrence 6 Sept. 12, ae. 93. For 1862, we add to pages long since written, one para- graph indited in troublous times. The present is not the moment, nor is this the place to inquire the reason for the existing rebellion and the consequent state of military preparation and civil commotion. Suffice to say, yrs. since I came from Eng. and I am now 37,” and was therefore 93 yrs. old when he d. He was in Boston 1631, and in 1649 was in Yarm. and Barnstable; a dep. 1663-9; ord. ruling elder Ap. 14, 1670; selectman &c. He was doubtless the son of Thomas of Brinsfiltae, near Dorchester, Eng.; and, from his son John, b. Mar. 3, 1669-70 who m. 1st Mary Skiff, dr. of Stephen of this town ; and through John b. Sept. 18, 1697 who m. Hannah Fessenden of Camb. Sept. 26, 1723, and had Benj. Nov. 7, 1726 who by m. to a 2d w. Betty Freeman Nov. 15, 1758 had Benj. Jr. May 6, 1768 who m. Lydia Ellis Nov. 21, 1793, was descended the above Jona. E. who was b. July 27, 1803, m. Celia Bassett and had James F., Mary, Chs., now a Major in the U. S. volunteers, and others. — See Annals of Be. 1 Mr. Gibbs was s. of Silvanus who m. Katy Tobey Aug. 25, 1774 and had Hannah June 20, 1777 ; Joanna Oct. 12, 1779; Silvanus and Benj., gem., Jan. 27, 1782; and by his 2d w. Hannah had Nathan B. Sept. 27, 1783; Katy T. Mar. 3, 1785 who m. Wm. Swift; Alfred Nov. 3, 1786; Elizabeth Aug. 11, 1788; Clarissa Mar. 16, 1790; Thomas F. May 28, 1792 ; Caroline Oct. 1, 1793 ; Joseph Dec. 21, 1795 $ Experience Jan. 18, 1797; Alexr. May 12, 1799; and Joanna Aug. 12, 1803. Mr. Silvanus Gibbs was a most exemplary and excellent citizen. 2 Mr. B., b. Sept. 25, 1784, was 4th s. of Samuel who m. Patience Gibbs Mar. 8, 1772. The name was prominent and influential through several generations from the days of Michael the progenitor. Once numerous in town, the descendants have faded away by deaths and removals until few remain. It would be a task indeed to arrange the generations in order and would require many pp. 3 Mr. E. m. Fear Blackwell Dec. 31, 1798, and was 4th s. of Elnathan who m. Bethia Bassett of Be. June 5, 1769 and had Seth, Nathan, Gideon, Jemima, Gershom Ap. 2, 1777, Thankful, Sami., Bethia, and Molly; and was g. s. of Gideon who by Anna and Jemima had Elisha, Anna, Elnathan Jan. 5, 1739^10, Seth, Abiel, John, Samuel, and Reuben. 4 For the family of Ewers, see note in Annals of Be. 6 Mr. Wing was b. May 15, 1781, and m. Beulah Bowman of F. He was s. of Pressbury who m. Hannah Swift and had Joshua, Benj., Joseph, and Silvanus; and g. s. of Joshua who by Mary had Sarah Sept. 23, 1745 ; Joseph July 25,1748; Elizabeth Dec. 20,1750 ; and Pressbury June 26,1754. 6 For Lawrences, see Be. and Falm. Also for the multitudinous family of Howlands descended from Mr. John the 13th signer of “ the Compact ” in Cape Cod harbor. Many of these have been and still are in this town; but the name was not prevalent here until the close of the first hundred years.166 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. " They ever do pretend To have received a wrong, who do a wrong intend.” Nor shall we attempt any record of the present actual condition of public affairs, or seek to anticipate the future. Sandwich has been foremost of the Cape towns to respond to the calls that have been made for volunteers to defend the public property and to crush a daring attempt to dissolve the Union. If traitors shall finally be constrained to confess “ Even-handed justice Returns th’ ingredients of our poison’d chalice To our own lips,” they, surely, will have no just claim for sympathy. If these States shall again resume their wonted course of prosperity, in union and at peace, the world may well rejoice; if the government established by the toils and blood and patriotism of our fathers, shall fail and the glory depart, a universe might find cause in such mis- fortune to shroud itself in sadness. As we intended, the more recent events connected with the history of the town, have not been noted very minutely; nor are we sure that if they were important we are competent to record them with all impartiality. De Lamartine well remarks, “Events are best under- stood from a distance, because from thence the details do not attract the eye, but the objects present them- selves in their more important points of view.” The present is called an age of ‘progress/ an age of * improvementand these simple annals of early times may possibly be scanned by eyes of some who are slow to discern the full virtues of the past, though quick to magnify the present. We acknowledge that we cannot claim for the existing state of society that it is a fair representation of the long past—although we would be proud if it might with propriety be so pronounced.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 167 We institute no odious comparisons; we recognize with pleasure all improvements and all progress that conduce to the general weal and have their foundation in rectitude; but feel constrained to confess that with all. its faults the circle of the first two centuries will not suffer in comparison with the present hour. Improve" ments, indeed, there are; and there is progress: but “ Are we aught enriched in love and meekness, Can aught in us be found more pure and wise, More than in humbler times* grand human story, That makes our hearts more apt to sympathize With Heaven; our souls more fit for glory P ” With regard to locality, we doubt whether its attrac- tions have increased. At all times in the season when the earth is in its richest attire, the landscape has been beau- tiful. Hills and valleys, ponds and streams, the ocean and the forest, the romantic and the picturesque, have been combined in prospect We still enjoy in degree “ The melodies of woods, and winds, and water; ** but many can remember when the rural quiet and enjoyment were greater, and then there was that gave to society a landmark that elicited observation from afar. The nobles have passed away. As it has been with the fathers, so in one respect will it be with us — “ like snow-flakes o’er a river 5 A moment white, then gone forever.** Happy for us, happy for the world, if we do as much for our day and generation and for posterity as did they, and leave to .the future historian as good mate- rials for the record of doings and virtues. We subjoin a few statistics, embracing a view of Deputies and Representatives, Selectmen, Town Clerks, and Treasurers, from the first to the present time.168 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. DEPUTIES. The first meeting of a representative assembly in Gen. Court, was in 1639. The following persons were, in the order given, chosen to represent the town of Sandwich, and served the number of years affixed to their names, viz.: 1639. Richard Bourne, 14. “ John Vincent, 7. 1640. George Allen, 4. 1642. Wm.Newland, 8. “ John Allen, 1. “ Thomas Burge, 11. 1643. Edw. Dillingham, 1. 1643. Henry Feake, 2. 1644. James Skiff, 13. 1646. Edm. Freeman Sr., 1. “ Thos. Tupper, 19. 1662. Wm. Bassett Sr., 3. 1663. Thos. Dexter, 1. 1668. Thos. Wing Sr., 1. 1669. Edm. Freeman Jr., 7. 1673. Thos. Tupper Jr., 8. “ Wm. Swift, 4. 1675. Stephen Skiff, 10. 1684. Sheaij. Bourne, 2. 1691. Elisha Bourne, 1. REPRESENTATIVES being required by Gov. Phips in 1692, the first ‘Great and General Court9 under the new charter, assembled June 8 : ___ x rs* 1692. Thos. Tupper, 1. “ Sheaij. Bourne, 3. 1693. Samuel Prince, 5. 1696. Stephen Skiff, 10. 1697. William Bassett, 7. 1698. Thomas Smith, 2. 1711. Eldad Tupper, 3. 1713. Mel. Bourne, 4. 1714. Sami. Jennings, 3. 1715. John Chipman, 2. 1722. Israel Tupper, 1. 1725. Ezra Bourne, 10. 1739. Timo. Ruggles, 6. 1742. Sami. Tupper, 7. 1753. Roland Cotton, 8. 1761. Stephen Nye, 18. 1775. Nathl. Freeman, 4. “ Joseph Nye 3d, 16. 1779. Lot Nye, 1. jcrs. 1785. Abm. Williams, 2. 1787. Thos. Smith, 3. “ Thos. Nye, 1. 1797. Wm. Bodfish, 7. 1804. Jno. Freeman, 7. 1806. Benj. Percival, 6. 1810. Elisha Pope, 6. 1812. Benj. Burgess, 10. “ Peter Nye, 1. “ Thos. H. Tobey, 1. 1817. Russell Freeman, 6. 1824. Obed B. Nye, 1. 1825. Wendell Davis, 1. 1830. Shad. Freeman, 3. “ Thos. Swift, 1. 1834. Abm. Nye, 3. 1835. Jesse Boyden, 2. “ Daniel Weston, 1. 1836. Lemuel B. Nye, • 1. “ Abram Fish, 1. 1837. Charles Nye, 3. “ Josiah Bacon, 3. “ Benj. Bourne, 4. 1840. Jno. B. Dillingham, 2. “ Geo. W. Ellis, 3. 1843. Asahel Cobb, 5. 1845. David Benson, 2. “ William Handy Jr., 1. 1846. Charles Swift, 2. 1847. F. B. Dillingham, 1. 1849. Henry Bourne,) 2. 1850. Zebedee Green, 1. “ Henry V. Spurr, 1. 1854. Reuben Collins Jr., 1. 1855. Joseph H. Lapham, 1. 1856. Chas. H. Nye, 2* %3T The preceding table gives the number of years each served, but not the consecutive years after the first election. SELECTMEN. In 1662, it was enacted by the Gen. Court, that “ in every town of this jurisdiction there shall be tnree or five selectmen chosen by the townsmen, out of the freemen — such as shall be approved by the Court, for the better managing of the affairs of the respective townships.” The first record made of selectmen in Sandwich, was in 1667 ; and the following have served: 1667. Thos. Tupper, “ James Skiff, “ Thos. Burgess, 1668. Edm. Freeman, 1669. Thos. Wing, 1672. Thos. Burgess, 1673. Wm. Swift Sr., 1675. Steph. Skiff, “ Thos. Tupper Jr„ 1679. Jno. Blackwell, 1684. Shearj. Bourne, 1688. Elisha Bourne, “ Wm. Bassett, 1693. Sami. Prince, 1694. John Gibbs, 1695. Shubael Smith, 1697. Thomas Smith, 1698. Jonathan Nye, 1699. Danl. Allen, “ John Smith, Yrs. 5. 9. 2. 11. 4. 1. 15. 7. 14. 3. 4. 9. 11. 5. 4. 13. Yrs. 1704. Edw. Dillingham, 10. 1707. Israel Tupper, 13. 1709. Matthias Ellis, 1. 1710. Edm. Freeman Sr., 7. 1712. Eliakim Tupper, 12. “ Sami. Jennings, 1. 1715. Jno. Chipman, 6. 1718. Wm. Bassett Jr., 8. 1720. Jireh Swift, 2. 1723. Stephen Skiff, 19. 1726. Elisha Bourne, 9. 1736. Jno. Freeman, 24. 1740. Sami* Tupper* 19. 1744. Ebenr. Nye, 5. 1752. Joshua Hall, 1. “ Thomas Smith, 9. 1759. Solomon Foster, 8. 1760. Ebenr. Allen, 3. 1761. Jona. Bassett, 10. 1763. Thos. Bourne, 7. 1763. John Allen, 1766. Mich. Blackwell, 1770. John Smith, 1773. Joseph Nye 3d, “ Seth Freeman, 1776. Silvs. Nye, 1779. Lot Nye, 1783. Thos. Burgess, 1784. George Allen, 1786. Sylvanus Gibbs, 1787. Thos. Swift, “ Thos. Smith, 1787. Steph. Chipman, 1788. Ebenr. Allen, 1789. Thos. Foster, 1791. Abm. Williams, 1795. Nathan Nye Jr., “ Leml. Freeman, 1797* Bepj. Percival, 1798. George Allen, Yrs. 13. 4. 7. 18. 13. 6. 1. 3. 9. 2. 1. 2. 2. 1. 2. 4. 22. 1. 19. 9.ANNALS OF SANDWICH. 169 1807. Jas. Freeman, l. 1809. Elisha Perry, 13. 1816. Mel. Bourne, 15. 1817. William Handy, 1. “ Thos. W. Robinson, 3. 1818. Levi Nye, 1. 1822. Bethuel Bourne, 7. 1824. Steph. Holway, 2. 1826. Henry Lawrence, 3. 1827. Ezra Tobey, 3. . Yra. 1829. Jesse Boyden, 17. “ Beiy. Bourne, 8. 1834. Abram Nye, 3. 1S35. Russell Freeman, 1. 1836. Chas. Nye, 2. “ J. B. Dillingham, 5. ** Joseph Hoxie, 1. 1841. Elisha Pope, 1. “ Simeon Dillingham, 5. “ Clark Hoxie, 4. 1847. Ch. B. H. Fessenden, 7. 1851. Geo. Giddings, 2. “ Edw. W. Ewer, 6. 1853. F. B. Dillingham, 3. 1854. Reuben Collins Jr., 2. 1855. Joshua Handy, 1. “ Seth B. Wing, 7. 1858. Mason White, 4. “ Isaiah Fish, 4. TOWN TREASURERS. There are no means of ascertaining with certainty who were the incum- bents the first fifty years after the settlement of the town. It is not improbable that in most instances the Clerks served in this capacity also. We give the names and order so far only as we can do it with accuracy. 1694. Samuel Prince. 1699. Thomas Smith. 1701. John Smith Jr. 1719. Sami. Jennings. 1752. Solomon Foster. 1755. Silas Bourne. 1757. Jonathan Bassett. 1760. Thomas Bassett. 1761. Silas Tupper. 1777. Thomas Bassett. 1782. Benj. Fessenden.l “ Lemuel Pope. 1783. Nathan Nye Jr. 1787. Abraham Williams. 1795. Melatiah Bourne. 1803. James Bourne Jr. 1813. Heman Tobey. 1814. Nathan Nye Jr. 1825. Ezra Tobey. 1838. William J. Freeman. 1840. David C. Freeman. TOWN CLERKS. It is impossible to determine accurately the date of election of several of the first Clerks, or the length of time they were in office ; and we only infer the order of the first two from probable data. William Wood.2 Thomas Tupper. 1669. Stephen Wing. 1670. Edm. Freeman Jr. 1675. Thomas Tupper Jr. 1685. William Bassett. 1720. William Bassett Jr. 1721. Nathaniel Bassett. “ Samuel Jennings. 1751. Solomon Foster. 1753. Thomas Smith. 1758. Benj. Fessenden. 1784. Melatiah Bourne Sr. 1791. Abraham Williams. 1795. Melatiah Bourne. 1803. James Bourne Jr. 1814. Nathan Nye Jr. 1825. Ezra Tobey. 1838. Wm. J. Freeman. 1840. David C. Freeman. 1 Refused to serve. 2 There may have been two of the name of William Wood filling this office in succession; but we do not intend an opinion that it was so; indeed we think it improbable. We find evidence, however, that William Wood was Town Clerk in 1649, for he makes the following entry : “ Miriam Wood was buried in Sandwich May 9, 1648. Att. William Wood, Town Clerk.” The records also show that “ Miriam Wood was b. May 8, 1648, and Mary Wood Mar. 29, 1649.” Other records show that “ administra- tion was gr. on the estate of Mr. William Wood of Sandwich, 1639.” The two of the same name may have been father and son. We are utterly unable, however, to corroborate by any thing substantial the declaration of Mr. Lewis of Lynn, that the first town clerk of Sandwich was the Author of 4 New England’s Prospect;9 although circumstances seem to favor such hypothesis. (See p. 15.) There was a Nathl. Wood of this town; and, in 1685, “ Elizabeth the wife of Caleb Nye quitclaimed all right ” to lands deeded by said Nathl. There was also a William Wood of Dartm., who took the oath of fidelity, 1684. Since our note respecting George Barlow, p. 72, was in type, our atten- tion has been directed by a valuable correspbndent, Mr. R. C. Ingraham of N. Bedford, to * Sewal’s Hist, of the Quakers/ Yol. 1. p. 427 : “ One Bar- low who formerly had been a preacher at Exeter, afterwards turned lawyer, and at length became a marshal, would boast that when he went to distrain for fines, he would think what goods were most serviceable to the Quakers, VOL. H. 22170 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Besides those mentioned Vol. I. p. 792, as Graduates, were others in the Cape towns whose names were overlooked when that table was published; but we do not regard the fact of suffi- cient importance to undertake to supply such omissions in these pages otherwise than as incidental mention has been, or shall be made in the genealogical or biographical notices. If other omissions, of importance, shall be perceived in time, they may be supplied in an appendix at the close of this volume. and then he would take them away. By such doings he encouraged others to vice; for a certain Indian taking a knife from an Englishman’s house, and being told that he should not steal, answered that he himself had thought so, but now he saw that Barlow and the magistrates did so by the Quakers. This Barlow in the days of Cromwell having grown rich with the spoils of the innocent, grew poor after King Charles was restored 5 which made Barlow say that he hoped for a good tune again; and took the shameful liberty to add he thought the Quakers would not let him want.” The preceding doubtless gives sufficient intimation of the locality and career of Barlow previous to his coming to Sandwich.THE AFHALS OF THE TOWN OF YARMOUTH. “By aw iwstiwct or wature, we loyk to leaks- the places or otrs bibth and the chief circumstances or the LIVES of OUE pbooenitobs.”—Hon. James Savage.TO J. WINGATE THORNTON, ESQ., COUNSELLOR AT LAW: Thebe would be singular propriety in the inscription of these Annals of the second town in the order of settlement on Cape Cod, to a worthy lineal descendant of that venerable man, Rev. Thomas Thornton, first minister of Yarmouth; and the pertinency of the act would be commended by a recognition of your * Landing at Cape Ann,* ‘ Ancient Pemaquid,’ and * History of Anglo-American Colonization,’ your discoveries and suggestions leading to the recovery of the supposed hopelessly lost MSS. of Governor Bradford, and other labors giving assurance of that antiquarian and historical zeal and acumen by which you merit a prominent place among the literary benefactors of the age: But, Sir, my especial object in this Inscription, is to convey at least some feeble expression of the pleasure with which I have witnessed your always disinterested promptitude in aiding inquiry, and your encouraging cheer- onward in the toils of research—labors amid discouragements inevitably attendant which none but those who have had personal experience in “ breaking the ice for others who shall come after with less difficulty ” can understand or appreciate: traits that define the generous proficient in Antiquarian or Historical research, whose feeling is sure to be “Non ignarus mali, miseris succurrere disco.'* Pardon the liberty I take without first asking permission, and accept the respectful and fraternal salutations of THE AUTHOR. (172)ANNALS OF YARMOUTH In giving precedence to Yarmouth, rather than Barn- stable, in the order of presenting the annals of towns, we are governed not more by the tradition of earlier attempts at settlement, than by the fact that the former had probably priority in organization if not incorpora- tion. Yarmouth, as Sandwich, was first represented in General Court in June 1639; Barnstable not until the December following.1 Situation and Boundaries.—Adopting the suggestion of Rev. Mr. Alden in his ‘Memorabilia of Yarmouth/ that “the Cape may be well represented by a man’s arm in a certain posi- tion ” — i. e. bent at the elbow at an angle of 45°, with the hand turned from the wrist towards the body; we may represent this town as situated about midway from the shoulder to the elbow of the peninsula. It extends across the Cape — its lat. 40° 41', having the Atlantic on the North and South, Dennis on the East, and Barnstable on the West.2 Its ancient meeting-house was about 4 m. E. of the court-house in Barnstable, and 69 m. from Boston. Natural Divisions, &c.—The township contains, besides its more sparse settlements, several very pleasant villages. Passing down the Cape on the north side by the old county road, the These Courts were holden on the 1st Tu. in Mar., June, Sept., and Dec., annually. 2 The reader will understand that in our description of Yarmouth, we present the township as it now is, and not according to its more extended proportions prior to the dismemberment from it of Dennis; although, until the incorporation of the latter, the annals of Yarmouth must necessarily embrace all that relates to the progress and doings of the primitive town- ship before being shorn of its original dimensions. (173)174 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. traveller, unless lie look out sharply for the ‘boundary monu- ment,’ is sometimes unaware at what point the long avenue with its occasional divergencies of streets or roads introduces him from Barnstable to the town we would describe. He has remarked, as he moved along, the evidences of thrift on either side, and has admired the quiet and pleasant abodes scattered thickly the whole distance from ‘the great marshes’ in West Barnstable; and, although his position was unmistakable in passing the central part of East Barnstable, the still continuous settlement — alleviated occasionally by new views in the direction of the waters of the bay on the left, or, it may be, by the looming of the lower arm of the Cape across the water — has left him perhaps unsus- picious that he is in another town, until, led by the extent of the panorama to inquire, he is informed that already he has advanced some distance within the bounds of Yarmouth — to that part of it proverbially pleasant, called Yarmouth Port. The next village, as he proceeds along the same continuous range of cheerful dwellings interspersed with stores, artisans’ establishments, and public buildings, with agreeable sceneiy, is that called by way of priority, Yarmouth. He is conscious that he is in the old or central village — and this not because he finds any signs of dilapidation ; for the contrary is apparent: but, per- haps, because as he looks around him, the tout ensemble is more in accordance with his pre-conceived views of a highly respecta- ble puritanic old Cape Cod town; and because as he surveys the prospect in the distance, he thinks he catches some glimpses of the peculiar scenery with which his mind has been accustomed to associate the mention of Cape Cod.1 Before reaching the eastern terminus of this village, or the roads that diverge to North Dennis, to Brewster, or to Harwich; leaving the ancient county road and moving in the direction of the opposite side of the peninsula, noting varied scenery and passing some substantial farms and some clusters of pleasant dwellings, lie finds himself in view of the waters of the south side, and in that part of the township familiarly known as Bass- river, or Quaker-village, and with the post-office distinction South Yarmouth. This village is sufficiently compact and extended, with its draw-bridge connecting it to W. Dennis, to give the 1 Kendal, Travels 1807, was thus impressed. He says, “Here com- mences the peculiar scenery of the Cape — a soil of white sand generally covered with sward and with forest while in a state of nature, but naked and drifting before every wind when once laid bare to the elements.”ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 175 appearance of a thrifty, agreeable town of itself. This village is about 4 m. S. of the NT. part of the township. If the traveller pleases now to direct his course westerly, he is, soon after passing acres of salt works located on the very road- side and many others in the distance, pursuing his way through West Yarmouth. This, like the two first described, though more thinly settled and embracing small clusters or villages in the distance on either side — peculiarly romantic in the nearer approach to the south shore, is stretched a long distance continu- ously until, perhaps, the traveller needs again inquire at what point he left the township — for West Yarmouth merges imper- ceptibly with that part of Barnstable on the south side called Hyannis. The soil in some portions of the north part of the township is quite productive; the south part is more sandy and light, and yields moderately. Large bodies of valuable salt meadows are found in either part. Between the two shores is a considerable amount of woods — chiefly pines, but interspersed with oaks. On both sides of the township are harbors convenient for coasting and fishing vessels, the entrances being good at high tide. The harbor on the north side will be found more minutely described in the annals of Barnstable, it being a continuance of the same inland bay that forms the harbor of that town on the north. Bass River affords at its mouth a good harbor for vessels of small draught; and the U. States have erected a break-water for its protection. At this harbor are wharves and other conveniences for the business of the place. On the Yarmouth side of Lewis’ Bay, which also will be found more particularly described in the annals of Barnstable, is a convenient haven. Point Gammon makes off on the S. side, in W. Yarmouth, on the extreme end of which is a light-house. The township contains several large ponds of pure and soft water, some of them of considerable beauty. From one of these issues Bass River. The pond affords a small water-power. A similar convenience is found in W. Yarmouth. The dependence, however, for grinding the cereals, is perhaps chiefly on wind-mills. German’s Hill, 136 feet above the sea, is the highest land in the township.1 Fort Hill still retains the name, without any noticeable eminence; but here, in the latter part of the 17th cen- 1 “ The steeple of ‘ the old parish meeting-house,’ ” it was said by Mr. Alden in 1797, was “ long an important landmark for vessels going into Yarmouth or Barnstable harbors on the Bay side.”176 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. tury, were seen the vestiges of an old fort built for protection from Indians. It stood one fourth of a mile northward of 4 the old meeting-house.’ The ravages of winds, long since left neither fort nor elevation. Mr. Alden said, in 1797,c; Within the mem- ory of some, the Indians in this town were nearly as numerous as the white people.”1 He subsequently adds, 44 So late as 1779, there was, in 4 Indian-town,’ a small cluster of wigwams — about one mile from the mouth of Bass River, in the south-eastern part of the town — which were inhabited by the remnants of the Paw- kunnawhat Indians. The chief of them about this time had the small-pox ; five who had it survived, and eleven died. It is prob- able that this part of Yarm. will ever retain the name of Indian- town.”2 In 1797, there was left standing one wigwam only; it was on the banks of the river, and was occupied by a squaw and a negro. On the north-eastern side of Swan’s Pond, a little south-west of Indian-town, stood, a century and a half since, an ancient Indian meeting-house. Below the meeting-house, nearer the pond, was—and doubtless still remains — the spring where a now extinct race once slaked their thirst when here congregated for religious purposes. 1 Mr. Alden says, 44 When the maize was in its milky state, they used to prepare a delicious food composed of corn and other mgredients, and this they called appoon” We presume Mr. Alden refers to a dish of Indian origin, still common in its season, called 4 green-corn pudding/ 2 One of these Indians Mr. Alden mentions particularly —44 Joseph Nau- JiaugTit, a very conscientious deacon,” of whom many anecdotes were for- merly related. 44 He was a temperate Indian, well-minded, pious. He used to pray with great fervor, in his vernacular tongue, in his family, and with the sick, and at funerals In his last illness Rev. Tim. Alden Sr. visited him ; and, conversing with him on death, asked if he was resigned to his approaching dissolution. Nauhaught replied, 4 O yes, Mr. Alden, I have always had a pretty good notion about death/ ” The story of Deacon Nau- haught’s being attacked by a number of large black snakes, partakes rather of the marvellous ; but as the President of Meadville College indorsed it, and since it is found in the Massachusetts’ Magazine of 1794, and also in the Mass. Hist. Coll, for 1797, we are, perhaps, in duty bound to reproduce it: 4 He was distant from any of the inhabitants, had no knife with him, no means of defence, and was, therefore, when attacked, in a very precarious situation. To outrun the snakes was impossible, and to keep them off with- out the aid of some weapon was as impracticable. The deacon, finding the snakes winding themselves about his person, one having made his way even to the Indian’s neck and assaying to put his head into the Indian’s mouth, Nauhaught permitted it; but no sooner did the reptile thrust in his head than the sharp incisors inserted in strong jaws closed upon the intruder and at once decapitated him ; the other snakes’ bright eyes caught sight of the bloody neck of their leader, and instantly loosened their coils, fleeing with great precipitation.’ Thus was the deacon, by the power of his jaws, liberated happily from threatened death. As we have ventured thus far, the Indian tradition in regard to theANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 177 Fish are abundant here, as in the neighboring towns. Baas River furnishes in winter a large supply of eels. Fowl, in their season, are found on the shores and about the ponds and salt- meadows. The business of the town is perhaps chiefly maritime.1 Agri- culture receives some attention; but is by no means in the as- cendant. The cranberry culture is coming into vogue. Formerly the salt manufacture occupied a large space in the enterprise of the people ; this business has greatly declined, but is still very considerable. Epsom salts are produced in quantities; and a magnesia factory is in successful operation. The manufacture of carriages is carried on to some extent, and other varied industrial pursuits might be noticed — none of the latter, however, are on a large scale, unless, perhaps an exception be made of the steam sawing, planing, and grinding mills at South Yarmouth. Yar- first exploration of the island Nauticon pointed out by the ancient voyagers, alias Nantucket, and the origin of the fogs in the sound, may as well be added. The tradition of the Vineyard Indians does not entirely coincide with this of the Mattacheesetts; but for the variance in the traditions we are not responsible. We give the latter the benefit of their own story: ‘A great many moons ago, a bird of monstrous size was in the habit of visiting the south shore of Cape Cod, carrying off pappooses and even larger children. Its flight was southward. An Indian giant resided in these parts, by the name of Maushop. Enraged at the havoc made, for many small children had disappeared, he pursued the bird, wading across the sound, until he came to an island before unknown. Here, he found bones of children scattered in heaps around the trunk and under the shade of a great tree. Wishing now, after the fatigue of fording the sound and searching the island, to smoke his pipe on his way back, but finding he had no tobacco, he filled his pipe with poke — a weed that the Indians ever after used as a substitute when their stock of tobacco failed; — and from the time of this memorable event fogs have been frequent in Nantucket and on and around the Vineyard Sound and Nantucket Shoals; so that when- ever the Indians see a fog arising, they are accustomed to say in their own tongue what rendered in plain English is, “ There comes old Maushop’s smoke.” ’ *At the beginning of the present century, this business was considerable. At Bass River were 6 wharves (3 near the mouth of the river, and & a mile north of it) ; one brig sailed between this place and the W. Indies; 10 coasters of 30 or 40 tons burden, to Boston, Connecticut, or the South- ern States, and thence to the W. Indies; 10 vessels (of which one was 100 tons, the others from 40 to 70) were engaged in the fisheries at the straits of Belle Isle, the shoals of Nova Scotia, or upon Nantucket Shoals. A fishing vessel used on an average about 700 bu. of salt each year. Some vessels were annually built at Bass River. In Lewis’ Bay were 4 coasters of about 45 tons each, and 10 fishing vessels of from 40 to 50 tons each. — In 1837, there were in S. Yarm. not only extensive salt works—52 establishments — yielding 365,200 bu.; but 13 vessels engaged in the cod and mackerel fisheries, producing 4,300 qu. of cod-fish, and 2,287 bbls. of mackerel. VOL. II. 23178 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. mouth has furnished its full quota of able seamen and accom- plished commanders. It has ever been regarded as a thriving town, and has given birth to some distinguished men. The cause of education has generally been prominent before the people; of late years it has received an impulse correspond- ing with the improvements of the age. The old district system has been abolished, and three large school-houses have been erected, — one in each section of the town, viz., northern, south- ern, and western, at a cost of about $12,000. The schools are “graded,” aeeording to modern practice. The nautical school, endowed by bequest of the late Joshua Sears, is also in operation. The other public buildings are of neat and respectable aspect, to say the least; but without superior architectural pretensions. The “Barnstable Bank” is located at Yarmouth Port; its capi- tal $350,000; and in the same building is the office of the “Barn- stable County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.” A printing-office, from which issues weekly the “Yarmouth Register,” is also established at “the Port.” Here is the hotel long known as “ Sears’.” There are, at the Port, meeting-houses of the Meth- odists, Universalists, and Swedenborgians; at Yarmouth proper, of the old Congregational Church; at South Yarmouth, of Meth- odists, Baptists, aud Friends; and at West Yarmouth, of Con- gregationalists and Methodists. The private dwellings in the township are generally neat, and betoken comfort, compe- tency, and thrift; some of them are fine specimens of the gen- teel residence. The ancient style of building has in great measure disappeared; but few of antique appearance remain. The surroundings of dwellings receive increased attention, and some streets exhibit a growing appreciation of the beauty and utility of shade trees. The population of the town was, according to the census of 1860, about 2,800; and, notwithstanding the fluctuations of busi- ness,1 maintains a constant increase. The location is eminently favorable to health, judging by the numerous instances of lon- 1The fishing business had so far declined in 1857 that the 1 Yar. Register’ said of it, “ It has wellnigh died out. Not more than two or three vessels have been sent from this port the present season, where formerly twenty or thirty sail were employed. Our citizens have turned their attention to for- eign commerce, or the coasting and packeting business, which pays alto- gether better than with our poor facilities for carrying on the fisheries compared with Provincetown, Gloucester, Wellfleet, and other places on the coast.*’ In 1863, the same paper says, “ The last of the fishing-fleet has heen .sold.”ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 179 gevity furnished by records, and the numbers of aged people that still survive. As the Yarmouth records prior to 1677 are “lost,” we have only imperfect materials for the early history of this town. That there may have been a few settlers here soon after the settlement of Sandwich was begun in 1637, is not at all improbable. The permission to . Mr. Stephen Hopkins, Aug. 7, 1638, “ to erect a house at Mattacheese, and cut hay to winter his cattle, pro- vided it do not withdraw him from the town of Ply- mouth ; ’ and to Gabriel Whelden and Gregory Arm- strong, Sept. 3; as also the attempt of the Rev. Stephen Batchelor and associates from Lynn, to estab- lish themselves here, have already been noticed.1 The ultimate and permanent establishment must un- doubtedly be referred to the summer of 1639, under 1 See Yol. I. 135-6. Whether the abortive attempt was made within what are now the bounds of Yarmouth, or Barnstable, or partly within the present bounds of both, is a question of little moment. We have regarded it safe, however, to follow the record of Gov. Winthrop. It has been sup- posed that Mr. Batchelor undertook the establishment of the plantation by consent of Mr. Callicut. Of Mr. B. much has been gratuitously written to his disparagement. From all that we gather from his contemporaries, we infer that he was learned, and, in the judgment of charity, a good man; but that his whole life, extending through nearly a century of years, was singularly pregnant with incidents of trial. These were not chiefly the result of ejectment for nonconformity. Of this act, Mr. Lewis, of Lynn, has, contrary to the general practice, recorded the following sensible re- mark : “ The church (of Eng.) has been much censured for her severity; and all uncharitableness and persecution are to be deprecated. But in simply ejecting her ministers for non-conformity after they have approved of her modes of worship, and in the most solemn manner possible engaged themselves in her service, the church is no more censurable than all other communities with whom the same practice is common.” Mr. B/s greatest trials were from quite another source; and it is surprising how far-reaching were early attempts to frame excuses for harassing with penalties and pur- suing with vindictiveness those who fell under “ suspicion.” It is equally notable how ready are some at the present day to catch the strain and labor to justify detraction even by doubtful traditional circumstances de- veloped, whether with or without foundation in truth, ex post facto. Rev. Stephen Batchelor, b. 1560, had 4 sons and 3 drs., viz.: Nathaniel, Stephen, Henry, Francis, Theodata who m. Christopher Hussey, and is prob. the ancestor of the Nantucket Husseys, Deborah who m. John Wing and settled in Sandwich, and a dr. who m. John Sanborn. Among the descendants of R®^. Mr. B. are claimed Daniel Webster and John G. Whittier.180 HISTOflflr OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. the auspices of Messrs. Anthony Teacher, John C and Thomas Howes, grantees.1 A church was ably organized here at or about the time o| incorporation of the township, perhaps before, may, at least, infer this, seeing that the ecclesi was never, in those days, far behind the civic o zation, and often preceded it.3 The first settled ister, it is generally conceded, was the Rev. M duke Matthews.® Progress of the Town from its Settlement. ing invested with municipal rights, the town was resented in General Court, June 4, 1639, by Thomas Payne and Philip Tabor.4 Besides these 1 “ Mr. John Crowe, and Mr. Thomas Howes, of Mattacheese, al; mouth, took the oath of allegiance, 1638; Mr. Anthony Thacher. 1638-9.” 2 It has been claimed that a grant bearing date Jany. 6, 163& made, in which the original bounds are described as “ extending at Cape from the north side to the south shore, and from the bounds oJ stable on the West, to Winslow’s Brook, and to the Herring River a' Mills.” If such were the bounds originally designated, the terms h ployed, it is evident, could not have been the descriptive language’ grant, since they do not comport with the times. The fact, howeve* therefore to be concluded as necessarily apocryphal. 3 Rev. Mr. Matthews came over Sept. 21, 1638, in a ship fron staple, Eng., and, with his wife, Kathrine, landed in Boston, wl joined the church Feb. 6, following, and he, Feb. 7, took the oath giance. He is mentioned by Morton as one of “ those godly and a pel preachers with whom the Lord was pleased to accomplish and ac colony, who, being disposed of to the several churches and congre gave light in a glorious and resplendent manner as burning and fights.” Gov. Winthrop also styles Mr. Matthews “ a godly m Intimations of modern origin, made without good cause, and at b inferential, are utterly unworthy of regard. These, it is true, hav impugned his piety or learning; but, as if especially called upon tc ture some better reason than appears, why certain clergymen, ' worthy, were not greatly in favor with the magistrates, unwarrant; erties have been taken in the premises. One says, “ He was master, but exercised the ministerial functions at Yarmouth.” The sion which this statement would create, perhaps not designedly int< gratuitous. Mr. Matthews was, evidently, in his primary capacity gyman deserving of honor, though he may have united with his ec*n cal calling the laudable occupation alleged. I 4Mr. Philip Tabor was of Watertown, 1634; deputy of Ya 1639 and 1640; afterwards of the Vineyard, and, Savage says thence to N. London, Ct., but was of Portsmouth, R. L, 1656, long after at Providence, where he was representative, 1661, aiANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 181 tlemen, and the three before mentioned, “ to whom the grant of land at Mattacheesett, now called Yar- mouth,” was made, and “ Mr. Mad rick Matthews,” tb£ pastor, were William Palmer, appointed “ to exercise the inhabitants in the use of arms;” Samuel Ryder, William Lumpkin, and Thomas Hatch,1 “ candidates for freemen” at the opening of the year; and, yet in abeyance, was “Mr. John Coite.”2 Nicholas Sympkins and Joshua Barnes soon after appear as citizens, as also Andrew Hallett ; and, not long after, William Chase. It is, indeed, to be regretted that we are under the necessity of thus gathering the names of the earliest settlers, as well as items of history, from isolated materials: — “ Colligite fragments, ne quid pereat: ” the destruction of early town records impels to the duty; nor can we, it is apprehended, avoid the omis- sion of many names and important facts. In the progress of events, Walter Deville’s name appears in an order of court, 1640, touching “lands hereafter to be laid out and assigned in the town of Yarmouth,” and “the adjustment of bounds,” 1641; and in connection with an order “ for defraying the public charges,” appear the additional names of Thomas Holland, Crannett White, and Thomas Starr. In 1642, “ Peregrine White, of Yarmouth,” 3 was ap- pointed ensign of a military company, of which Myles Standish was captain, and William Palmer, lieutenant, Mr. Anthony Thacher being of the council of war. later at Tiverton. By his wife, prob. Lydia Masters, of Camb., he had John, bap. at Be., Nov. 8, 1640. He had other children, — Philip, Thos., Job, etc. Philip, Jr., had a family in Dartmouth. The wid. of Philip, Sr., m. Pardbn Tillinghast, Feb. 16, 1665, his 2d wife. 1 In 1647, he is mentioned as “ the late Thomas Hatch.” 2 Mr. Coil was originally included with the grantees, but went to Salem. 8 So say I le records, but we apprehend there is some mistake.182 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY, In 1643, military companies were authorized and organized in town, and the inhabitants were directed by government “ to provide a place of defence against sudden assault.” The persons in town liable to bear arms were: — Anthony Berry, Thomas Burman, Jas. Bursell, Jno. Burstall, Wm. Chase, Sr., Wra, Chase, Jr., Dan’l Cole, Job Cole, John Crowe, Yelverton Crowe, Rob’t Davis, Rob’t Dennis, John Derby, Wm. Edge, Roger Else, Thomas Falland, Thos. Flawne, Wm. Granse, John Gray, Benj. Hammon, Andrew Hallet, Sr., And. Hallett, Jr., Sam’l Hallet, Richard Hoar, Thos. Howe, Tristram Hull, John Joyce, Wm. Lumpkin, Jas. Matthews, Mr. Mar. Matthews, Wm. Nicorson, Hugh Norman, Wm. Northcutt Wm. Palmer, Thos. Payne. Wm. Pease, Rd. Pritchards, Sam’l Ryder, Richard Sears, Thomas Starr, Edward Sturgis, Nicholas Sympkins, Richard Taylor, Richard Templar, Anthony Thacher, Hugh Tilley,1 Wm. Twining, Nidi’s Wadibone, Henry Whelden, Emanuel White, Sam’l Williams, Peter Worden,2 Thus we gain a larger view of the inhabitants, through colo- nial records. In 1644, Mr. Anthony Thacher was “ licensed to draw wines,” and in 1645, the name of Teague Jones appears as a soldier from this town, in company with others in the Narraganset war. In 1646, the Rev. John Miller3 succeeded in the ministry Mr. Matthews.4 1 The name is afterwards written Hfflier. * This the only son of Peter Worden, Sr., who became an inhab. of this town, 1639, and had now deceased. 8 We have said, Vol. I., 249, that Mr. Miller prob. came 1646-7; but the precise date of the commencement of his pastorate is not certainly known; nor yet is it certain at what time the ministerial labors of Mr. Matthews were terminated. That he was succeeded by Mr. Miller there can be no doubt, however. Johnson’s Wonder-working Providence recognizes this fact, and the birth of Mr. Miller’s dr. Susannah, in this town, May 2, 164 7-, deter- mines his location at the time. 4 Rev. Air. Matthews, according to Air. Savage, was from Swansea,ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 183 In 1648, May 18, difficulties that had long existed respecting lands were happily adjusted. We have, perhaps, sufficiently adverted to these troubles in our former volume. It may, however, be proper here to say that misunderstandings were incident, first upon the fact that “ although Gov. Bradford had early bar- gained with the Sagamore, Mashantumpaine, to sell the lands at Mattacliiest to the whites, the considera- tion had not been, as was alleged, fully paid, nor the lands reserved for the Indians clearly defined and bounded.” These difficulties related to the very first grants; but succeeding this state of things, lands had, from time to time, been examined and surveyed, and some progress had been made in extinguishing Indian titles. The lands were “ first laid out in furlongs, and then subdivided for house and farm lots, — the house- lots being small, and all laid out on the north side of the road, no one person permitted to own two adjoin- ing lots to maintain only one house thereon; the object of this regulation being to secure the settle- ment of the inhabitants near each other for mutual Wales; and, Feb. 20, 1674, in his 18th year matriculated at All Souls, Col., Oxford. Mr. S. supposes he went to Hull about 1644; then to Mal- den, etc., and returning to England, died in his native place, according to Calamy, 1683. Mr. S. has it that he prob. had a son Mordecai who grad. H. C., 1655, and that his son Manesseh was bap. at Be. by Mr. Lothrop, Jan. 24, 1660. Nothing more of his family is known with certainty. That he was some time at Hull, and also at Malden, there can be no doubt. In 1651, May 15, he was cited to appear to answer in court for having uttered in sermons “ unsafe and unsound expressions,” for which he was fined £10, and the Malden church was also cited to answer for settling him without the approbation of the magistrates. The marshal, endeavoring to satisfy the demand lor fine against Mr. M, “ found nothing but his library.” Tra- dition, highly improbable, locates him at Cape May, 1692; which does not comport with the account given by Mr. S. and Calamy. Mr. Felt supposes he left Malden about 1652, and was some time in Lynn, taking passage to England about 1655, and then exercising his ministry where he was born, in Swansea. Mr. Felt records this honorable testimony to his merits, “ He was remarkable, in all his intercourse with others, for making the gospel the chief subject of coni ^rsation; was very pious and zealous, and con- tinued useful to the last.” '184 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. defence ” Complaints and court orders do not warrant the conclusion that the committees did not perform their duties faithfully to the extent of their ability; for, it was found that the instructions of the court were sometimes “ impracticable.”1 The troubles were prolonged2 until the above date, when, it is said, * Capt. Standish having, in the month of March pre- ceding, heard and decided a large number of cases, to put an end to all complaints, some were ejected, for- mer grants abrogated, and the properties reverted to the town.3 Thus,” it is affirmed, “ were finally settled all the grievances about the laying out of the lands from the beginning of the plantation.” 4 In 1649 and immediately succeeding years, certain persons who had not yet attained to the rights of citizenship, were involved by alleged delinquencies that figure in the court calendar; but as it would be manifestly unjust to array early offences against a subsequently irreproachable life, we gladly defer these matters to any whose taste may incline to luxuriate in such employment. In 1650, April 22, Mr. Samuel Hallett was drowned at Nauset. In 1651, March 4, ‘‘Emanuel White of Yarmouth,” was pre- sented at Plymouth, “for villifying the ministry of Mr. Miller;” and, at the next session of the court, June 2, the minister, “Mr. 1 Hence the action of the court, March, 1640, approving the doings of the committee, but ordering that they “ shall receive no more inhabitants without certificate.” 2Notwithstanding a special court “was held in town, June 17, 1642,” In consequence of continued dissatisfaction, “ by Edward Winslow, Miles Standish, and Edmund Freeman, gents., three of the assistants of the gov- ernment,” when and where “ it was ordered and concluded,” as repre- sented, “ to the satisfaction of all that Mr. Standish be joined to the com- mittee of Yarmouth,” and an arrangement was made “ for assigning the lands by lot.” 8The committee were allowed for their services: Mr. Thacher 110 acres of upland and 26 of meadow; Mr. Howes and Mr. Crowe each 80 acres of upland and 20 of meadow. 4An agreement had been made, “May 15, by Capt. Standish, Mr. Thacher, Mr. Crowe, and Mr. Howes, the committee on the part of the plantation of Yarmouth; and by Mr. Hoar, Mr. Hawes, Wm. Nickerson, Wm. Palmer, and Robert Dennis, in behalf of the town, that Mr. Starr, Wm. Nickerson, and Rt. Dennis shall be joined to the committee for this present year.”ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 185 Miller was cit 3d to answer for remarks, in sermon, against the government.” We are not about to interpose an opinion in regard to the causes of the agitations of the present times. The pages of history are not the proper arena for the expression of individual fancies, nor of dogmatic de- cisions. It is proper, however, to state succinctly that great diversities of views on both political and relig- ious subjects existed in the colonies.1 The agitations of the day were not peculiar to any one community; and, in order to estimate the nature or importance of much that was spoken, written, or otherwise acted or enacted, it must be borne in mind that such a condition of things is not most favorable to charitable construction, correct judgment, or accurately descrip- tive terms of the' sentiments and doings of oppo- nents.2 1 Religious dissensions, whether associated with differences of political views, or not, naturally lead to insubordination; and the fact that the moral soil of the two colonies had thus early become apt for the intro- duction of a variety of opposing doctrines tending to troubles that must for a long time convulse, more or less, every plantation and church, conveys a sad reflection! a Opprobrious epithets were freely applied. On the one hand the policy of those in power was denounced as exclusive and coercive; and on the other, the least dissent from that policy elicited suspicion. If new doc- trines were broached, the kind of opposition they encountered added strength to conviction, and gave increased boldness, and, probably, vehe- mence to utterance. Mr. Felt tells us that “ the doctrines of ‘ the Seekers9 had spread among the people of the colonies; ” and supposes the letter of Rev. Mr. Leveridge to Rev. John Wilson, Sept. 22, 1652, refers especially to their influence: “ It is not unknown to you and others what singular conflicts I have met withal in my troubles among my own countrymen, — divers of them transported with their, though not singular, fancies, to the neglecting of all churches and ordinances, by a new cunning, and, I per- suade myself, one of the last but most pernicious plots of the devil to un- dermine all religion.” Mr. L. remarks further that “ but for the persua- sion of his friends,” he would have moved away with members of his church, “to a more favorable location.” The ‘ Seekers * were first known distinctively in England about 1645, and held that the true church ministry, Scriptures, and ordinances were lost. For these they professed to seek. They said, “ The Bible is uncertain, the ministry without author- ity, present modes of worship and ordinances vain, and renewed miracles necessary to faith.” That there were some in the Cape towns who listened to such teac) ings, there can be no doubt; but the influences, gradual or VOL. n 24186 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1652, the sermon preached by Rev. Mr. Miller appears to have been regarded by the General Court as offering sufficient occasion to instruct a “jury to make due inquiry to vindicate the government.” Whether we find thus early a precedent for polit- ical discourses from the pulpit, we opine not; but men were, doubtless, not very unlike those of our own day. That the practices of some were not entirely dissimilar, receives confirmation from the fact that there was a disposition thus early to evade the liquor law : “William Hedge, of Yarmouth, one of the jurors appointed to lay out a road from Sandwich to Plymouth, was presented, Oct. 5, for selling wine and strong water without license ” He was, however, soon after “ elected ensign.” In 1653 John Gorham and Sergt. Ryder1 wrere deputies to meet others from the several towns “ to treat and conclude on military affairs ” Josiah Hallett and Thomas Gage appear on the court record at this time, charged with “sailing their vessel on Sunday;” and Francis Baker, “for selling wines without license.” In 1654, the town was again without a minister.2 The general complaint of a a growing indifference to the ministry ” was apropos to this town, as to every other part of New England. sudden, that ushered strange doctrines before the public, must he analyzed to appreciate the existing state of affairs and the trials to which religion was subjected at this early period of colonial history. 1 Sergt. Ryder was this year promoted to a lieutenancy; hut soon after presented, “ for affronting the constable when sent to enforce the impress- ment of men,” and was, for that offence, removed from office and reduced to the ranks. 2 At what time Rev. John Miller removed is quite uncertain. See Vol. I., 249, 250. We had supposed that he remained until called to Gro- ton; but were probably mistaken. His residence here must have ceased long before. His wife, Lydia, d. in Boston, Aug. 7, 1656. Besides those men- tioned in Vol. I., and probably other children b. in England, was Mehitable, b. in Roxbury, July 13, 1638, who m. John Crowe, of Yarmouth; Lydia, b. 1640, m. Fish, of Sandwich; Susannah, b. 1647, d. at Charlestown, Oct. 14, 1669; Elizh. b. 1649, m. Samuel Frost, of Billerica. Other drs. were Faith who m. Nathl. Winslow, of Marshfield, Aug. 3, 1664; and Hannah who m. Joseph Frost, of Charlestown, Nov. 6, 1677.ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 187 “The bounds of lands betwixt Yarmouth and Eastham, be- longing to the purchasers, ” were defined.1 “William Chase, Sr., of Yarmouth,” was presented “for driv- ing a pair of oxen in yoke on the Lord’s day, in time of ser- vice, about five miles.” Mr. Samuel Arnold was this year deputy.2 * In 1655, Mr. Anthony Thacher was commissioned “to join persons in marriage.” John Smith, carpenter, appears on record. Six wolves were destroyed in town and the bounty claimed. And complaint was made by John Derby against Mashantam- paine, Indian, his dogs doing “much damage to cattle.”8 In 1656, Thomas Starr was presented “ for opposing the constable,” and was fined.4 * * * In 1657, the inhabitants being engaged in a controversy with the Sachem, Yanno, about lands, inquiry was ordered by the court, and a settlement subsequently made. Mr. William Nick- erson was “ allowed, by court, to have his lands at Monamoiet viewed, that he may have a competency allowed him.” In 1655, June 1, Mr. John Miller, son of Rev. Mr. M., was made freeman by the Plymouth court. Sundry conferences were held, intended to effect an arrangement final of all difficul- ties with the Indians. In 1659, March 1, “the court taking notice that John Wing is erecting a building in a place that is out of the bounds of the 1 “ From the river of Namskekett to a marked tree and stake a little beyond the rocky point next Satuckett, on the sea side. The bounds of the lands of said purchasers to the eastward is from the bounds of East- ham to the Eastern Harbor, and from thence to a little pond, being the bounds of the land bought for the country, belonging to Cape Cod. What- ever whale or blubber shall be cast up against the lands of the purchasers to belong to them, as unto the towns.” 2 Mr. Arnold, who was liable to bear arms in Sandwich, 1643, had be- come an inhabitant of this town, but in what capacity he was here is not known further than that he was deputy in 1654 and 1656. In 1657 he went to Marshfield, where he was settled in the ministry in 1658, and d. Sept. 1,1693, aged 71. He probably was here as a religious teacher. He had by his w. Elizabeth, children born here, viz.: Samuel, May 9, 1649, who was the first minister of Rochester, 1684 ; Seth, who settled in Dux- bury; and Elizabeth, who m. Holmes, of Rochester. 8 The Indians were always noted for the possession of an ample supply of dogs. 4Mr. Thomas Starr was of Huxbury, 1639. He served in the Pe- quot war. He was some time in Scituate, where he had children born, viz.: Comfort, 1644, and Elizabeth, 1646 ; then came to this town, “ where he had been before,” and had b. to him Benj., Feb. 6, 1647-8, and Jehosh- aphat, Jan. 12,1649-50. He finally xmoved to Charlestown, says Savage.188 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. township, and conceiving that such practices, if permitted, may prove prejudicial to the whole, do order that the sd. John Wing and others that have done or shall do so, be prohibited to per- sist therein until it be further cleared to what township such said lands belong on which they build.”1 A portion of the in- habitants were commended by the court for a disposition to encourage and support the ministry; the others were censured for neglect, and orders were issued for a levy to be made annu- ally. Mr. William Chase died this year.2 In 1661, permission was given to Mr. Thomas Paine “ to pur- chase lands at Setucket for his mill.” And March 5, Richard Childs was ordered by the court to “ desist from erecting a cot- tage within the bounds of the town.”3 He was subsequently u permitted to enjoy his cottage.” And in 1661, the controver- sies in relation to “ drift whales ” were rife here, as in other Cape towns.4 In 1662 is probably to be located the advent here of the Rev. Thomas Thornton. That he was the third in succession of the pastorate in this town,5 there can 1 Mr. John Wing left Sandwich early, and seated himself at Sautucket; its relation to this township then of a somewhat equivocal character, but the situation which he occupied being considered as within the jurisdic- tion of Yarmouth. He and John Dillingham, also from Sandwich, became large land owners. 2 Mr. William Chase came over in 1630. He was constable in Yar- mouth, 1639, having resided some time both in Roxbury and Scituate. He brought with him from England a wife Mary, and a son William. He had a dr. Mary, b. May, 1637, who d., aged 15 ; and a son, Benj., b. 1640. His will, 1659, mentions his wife Mercy (or Mary), and sons, Wm. Jr., and Benj., — the former, eldest, to inherit his estate. He d. in May; his widow d. in Oct., the same year. 8 The practice of warning new-comers to depart from a town, which pre- vailed through the colony for a long period, strikes one now as a breach of hospitality and decorum, and so does the above order: and yet these pro- ceedings were in conformity with law, and of frequent application. Rea- sons for the existence of laws authorizing these practices were doubtless valid,—the circumstances of new settlements requiring great caution in the admission.to habitancy; and the impartial enforcement of the rule until the proposed conditions of citizenship were fulfilled, forbade the idea of its being intended as a reflection upon any one's character. Mr. Child m. Mary Linnett, Oct. 15, 1649, in Be., and is supposed to be the progenitor of those, generally, of the name in the county, and Samuel and Richard, of Barnstable, are supposed to have been his sons. The first was slain in the Rehoboth battle, March 25, 1675; the latter was ordained a deacon of the Be. church, Sept. 4, 1706. 4 See Yol. I., 243, 246. 6 We were made, through the error of the compositor, we presume, to say, in ar other place, that he was the first pastor.ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 189 be scarcely a doubt;1 but the precise date of his set- tlement is not determinable.2 We are to look for incidental testimony on this point; but whatever un- certainty may exist in regard to his entering on his ministry here the present year, we are sure that he was in the discharge of its active duties the year fol- lowing.3 About this time began the use of the title “Rev. ” — often “ Elder,” instead of “ Me? for Congre- gational ministers. In 1663, the vigilance of the law exacted of Thomas Sturgis a fine of £6 u for bringing liquor into town.” And in 1664, diffi- culties existed in regard to Monamoiet lands. In 1665, uthe lands at Monamoiet,” that had been for years in controversy between Mr. William Nickerson and others, were, after some adjustment of difficulties, and the subsidence of heat, adjudged to be “ within the liberties of the town of Yarmouth”4 Mr. Thomas Howes died this year.5 In 1666, at the March term, Thomas Starr and Jonathan Barnes were fined 40s. each, and Abraham Hedge 20s., “for abu- sive carriage towards Mr. Anthony Thacher at his house.” In June, the selectmen of towns were required by the court “to notice all persons who come to dwell without leave first obtained of the Governor and two assistants;” the offenders “to be pre- sented if permission be not thus obtained.” So began the prac- tice of “ warning ok/ of town.” And, Oct. 31, “ William Nick- erson, Sr., of Manamoit, having, in a letter to Rd. Nichols, Gover- nor of New York, scandalously reproached the government of N. 'It will be understood that Rev. Mr. Batchelor, although the min- ister first here, previous to the final settlement of the plantation, is not in- cluded. The same remark is applicable to Rev. Mr. Hull, of whom it is alleged by Mr. Lothrop’s church record that “ he joined himself with a company at Yarmouth, to become their pastor.” 2 Mather says he was one of those who fled subsequent to the Act of Uniformity, 1662; and Alden says, “ How soon after this he was settled in Yarmouth is not certainly known. We find his name in the town records for 1677, before which the records have been unfortunately lost.” 8 Felt has it that he was here as early as June 18, 1663. 4 See Vol. I., 256. 5 Mr. Thomas Howes was one of the original grantees of the town- ship, and often represented the town in General Court. His will bears date Sept. 26, 1665, and his wid. Mary administered, 1665-6. He men- tions sons Joseph, Thomas, and Jeremiah.190 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Plymouth and the freemen of the jurisdiction,” was required to give bonds to answer; as also “his sons-in-law, Robert Eldred, Nath’l Coveil, and Tristram Hedges, who were privy to his con- duct”1 John Joyce died this year, Dec. 21. In 1667, March 5, Wm. Lumpkin and Peter Worden were fined 10s. each, “for disturbance at the Yarmouth meeting- house;” Mr. Nickerson was called, July 2, to answer for words spoken against the preaching; and John Miller was licensed to keep an ordinary. Mr. Anthony Thacher died this year, Aug. 22.2 In 1669, March 2, sundry persons were fined 6s. each “ for smoking tobacco at the end of Yarmouth meeting-house on the Lord’s day, in time of exercise.” In 1671 the paucity of material for so full history as we would wish is somewhat relieved by a casual view of the watchful and gentle spirit of the Christian pas- tor,— his tender care, not merely to reclaim the erring, but to make their return to duty more grateful, as obtained from an intercessory letter addressed to Gov. Prince. Mr. Thornton, after certifying the offender’s a acknowledgment of his fault in the public assembly,” to the satisfaction of all, even of those most wronged, — the im confession ” of the penitent being inclosed to the Governor,—'suggests the reason of his being moved to mediate in his behalf, “ by that tender re- spect that I bear to a church child when they own the covenant and are willing to accept of exhortation and reproofs as he hath done; hoping, likewise, that he 1 It does not comport with manly discrimination to be censorious in esti- mating the character of early settlers because of occasional disagreements with the ruling powers, or records of acts liable to be misconceived. Mr. Nickerson and family were tenacious of what they regarded their rights, and the disallowance of their purchases made of Indians at an early date, was the occasion of prolonged disputes and bitter animosities. Mr. Nicker- son was, on another occasion, fined “ for disrespect to religion; ” and yet he exercised the office of lay religious teacher at Manomoiet, and continued to conduct public religious services until Mr. Vickery came. 2 See Vol. I., 142-5. Mr. Savage supposes that Mr. Thacher preached some time in Marblehead. That he had been a curate in England, there can be no doubt. Mr. Thacher’s position in the colony, and especially in Yarmouth, was one of high respectability and large influence.ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 191 will find the honorable court more favorable and tender towards him.” 1 Three persons were fined, at the March term, 30s. “ for sailing from Yarmouth to Boston on the Lord’s day,” and three others were summoned to appear for a like profanation. At the June term, one of these was also fined 5s. “ for swearing.” In June, 1672, the “ Committee’s Book of Grants,” opened in compliance with law, and on which it is written, “John Thacher was appointed to keep this book, and to enter records therein the committee being Messrs. “Edmund Hawes, Thomas Board- man, Andrew Hallett, Thomas Howes, and John Thacher,” but Messrs. Jeremiah Howes and John Miller being afterwards substituted “for Capt. Howes and Andrew Hallett; ” contains on its first page this entry: “Given unto the town of Yarmouth, their heirs and assigns forever, for the ministry, to lie for that end and use.forever, a parcel of land for a house-lot, where now the minister’s house stands; bounded on the north side by the land of Elisha Hedge; on the west by the highway; on the south side by the land of Anthony Fray [Fry] and Nathaniel Hall; on the east side by the river; containing ten acres and a parcel of meadow land, lying and being in a neck called and known by the name Hedge’s Neck, containing six acres; and another par- cel lying and being in the meadow at Canoe Point, bounded on 1 The letter, concluding with compliments to Mrs. Prince, has a black seal, — the device partially legible, but sufficient remaining to show what was in the heart of the writer: “ Christvm seqvor. ’ Another instance we may mention now that we are contributing to illustrate the character- istics of a good man. In 1G76-7, March G, his eldest having removed to Boston, the father says, in a letter to Rev. Increase Mather, “ I have here inclosed, sent my son Theophilus a letter of dismission by appointment of the church in Yarmouth. Though I know that I speak to one that is ten- der of souls, yet fatherly affection will be working. By a letter I did lately receive from him, I perceive that he is dejected in spirits; therefore, dear sir, let me beseech you to take the more care of him. I bless God that so long as he was with us, he was well-beloved of the most choice brethren.” Thus much for paternal love. And now, as an instance of fra- ternal correspondence, we will quote from another letter to Mr. Mather: “ One thing by which you have gained much in my heart, is the faithful- ness I find m your ministry and in your writings, inasmuch as you lend your study to strike at the sins of the backsliding times. Another thing, which others, with myself, take notice of, that you endeavor to be exem- plary to others in your conversation and in the habits of your wife and children. I speak to this end that God may have the glory and you be encouraged in your way of well-doing; for I see that in some ministers of the gospel that doth not well become their so holy calling,— especially ir some of the younger sort of ministers.”192 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. the north side by the meadow of Samuel Hall; and on the west side by the meadow of Thomas Howes; this contains four acres, more or less; and another parcel of planting land at Nobscus- sett, bounded on the north side by the land of Joseph Howes, and on the south side by the meadow of John Hall, Sr., and Joseph Howes, containing eight acres, more or less.” In 1673, in the month of January, Mr. John Crowell died.1 In 1674, the ever-to-be-regretted loss of town rec- ords by fire occurred.2 3 * * * * A memorandum of former transactions in the handwriting of Mr. Anthony Thacher, and witnessed by his sons, appears, cer- tified at this date, showing that Mashantampaine was fully com- pensated for lands at or near Stony Cove, etc.8 “ Monamoyick99 was “ ordered to be included in the town of Eastham.” It had been hitherto considered as “within the liberties of Yarmouth.” It was ordered, June 3, “that the freemen of the several towns have their names placed on record; none to be proposed here- after as freemen, unless approved by a majority of the town for 1 Mr. Crowell came over 1635; in 1638 sold lands in Charlestown, and was early in Yarmouth, with his wife Elishua. He had sons, Moses, bap. in Charlestown, 1637, who prob. d. young; John, Thomas, and Samuel. The name was long written Crow, sometimes Crowes, Croel, and finally subsided into the present form. 2 We could wish that the loss of town records ended here; but many pages of subsequent date are mutilated, worn, or nearly illegible. 3 “ Witnesseth these presents, that I, Masshantampaigne, Sagamore, doth acknowledge that I have received and had of Anthony Thacher, Mr. John Crow, and Mr. Thomas Howes, all and every particular thing and things that I was to have for all and every part and parcel of lands,” etc., etc. . . “ which sd. lands I sold to Mr. William Bradford, Esq. I say, I acknowl- edge myself fully satisfied and paid, . . and I do forever acquit the sd. Thacher, Crow, and Howes. . . In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand the 8th day of May, 1657. “ The mark lx of Masshantampaigne. “ Signed and delivered in presence of “ John Thacher, “Judah Thacher. “ There were also present Mr. John Crow, his wife, and Elizabeth Thacher, and Indian Felix.” “ I John Thacher, aged about 35 years, do testify that when my father took this above writing of Masshantampaigne, I was by and heard him own it, and saw him set his hand; and I set my name at that time as a witness.” “ Taken upon oath, this 9th day of Feb. 1674, before me, “John Freeman, Assistant.”ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 193 citizenship in which they are proposed.” Mr. Richard Taylor died this year.1 In 1675, nothing worthy of note occurs beyond the Indian troubles. The Narraganset battle, Dec. 19, in which contest Capt. John Gorham and others from the Cape towns distinguished themselves, and in which numbers fell, is memorable. Public gratitude is gen- erally slow in its expression by remunerative acknowl- edgments ; it was not until nearly all those who sur- vived the fight were deceased, that the appropriation of “ the Narraganset townships ” was made. In 1676, “town councils of war” being ordered, Messrs. Edmund Hawes, John Miller, and Jeremiah Howes were appointed. The requisitions for soldiers and money were frequent and cheerfully met2 Capt John Gorham died at Swansey, Feb. 5, of fever con- tracted in the service in which he and his associates 1 There were two contemporary Rd. Taylors. To distinguish them, one was called Rock, from the location of his dwelling; the other, Tailor Tay- lor. We suppose this to have been the latter, and that his children were John, Joseph, Mary, Martha, Elizabeth, Anne, Hannah, and Sarah. 2 “ List of soldiers that were pressed into the country’s service, and went to Mount Hope against our enemies the Indians, in the year 1675, and took their first march June 24: Dan’l Baker, Wm. Baker, Thos. Bax- ter, Jno. Berry, Jno. Chase, Jas. Claghorn, Jno. Crowell, Yelverton Crow- ell, Joseph Egleston, Thos. Folland, Wm. Folland, John Gorum, Capt., Wm. Grey, Jos. Hall, Nath Hall, corp., Sam. Hall, corp., Sam. Howes, Sam. Jones, Rd. Lake, Jno. Matthews, Jno. Pugsley, Benj. Ryder, Jas. Sever- ance, Jona. Smith, Jno. Taylor, Rd. Taylor, Sam. Thomas, Thos. Thorn- ton, Jos. Whelden, and Jotham White.-------Egf3 Horses lost: Mr. Thorn- ton, Benj. Ryder, Jona. Smith, Paul Sears, Jno. Crowell, Mr. Mayo, Ens. Thacher, Thos. Borman, and Ananias Wing.” “ Second Expedition to Narraganset: Capt. Gorum, Sergt. Wm. Gray, Corp. Jno. Hallett, Ananias Wing, Benj. Hall, Sam’l Sturgis, Hy. Gold, Wm. Chase, Jas. Claghorn, Jno. Pugsley, Sam’l Baker, Rd. Taylor, Jno. Whelden, Sergt Nath’l Hall, Hy. Gage.” “ Third Expedition, one month’s service: Capt. Thomas Howes, Sergt. Sam. Hall, Ab. Hedge, Jno. Matthews, Jno. Whelden, Sam. Thomas, Sam. Young, Jno. Taylor, Benjamin Ryder.” “ Fourth Expedition, mne men, with Capt.: Hy. Gold, Jno. Taylor, Wm. Gage, Hy. Gage, Wm. Nickerson, James Maker, Jno. Matthews, Jno. Whelden, Benj. Ryder.” “Fifth Expedition: Capt. Howes and 21 nen.” “ Sixth Expedition: Ens. Jno. Thacher.” VOL. II. 25194 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. so bravely fought Mr. Richard Sears also died this year at Sursuit, aged 86;1 Mr. Judah Thacher2 and Mr. Thomas Howes 3 were also added to the lists of mortality. Rev. John Mayo also died here this year, having left Boston in 1673, being very aged and in- firm, to reside with his daughter, Mrs. Joseph Howes. A “ rate ” made this year, April 29, by Messrs. Ed- mund Hawes, Samuel Rider, and James Matthews, “ towards the charge of the late war,” shows both the tax-paying inhabitants at this date, and their compara- tive wealth. We retain the order of names, inasmuch as it probably indicates neighborhood. Yelverton Crowe, £4. 1 Wm. Folland, 13. 1 Richard Berry, 1.10. 3 Samuel Rider, 5. 2. 6 John Miller, 3. 8. 9 Joseph Rider, 2.14. 3 Elizabeth Taylor, 8. 3 Gershom Hall, 1.13. 9 Rd. Taylor, 2.17. 9 Sam. Matthews, 1.13 Hy. Whelden, 13. 1 Teague Jones, 2. 4 David O’Kelia, 2. 6. 9 Jno. Taylor, 3. 8.10 Teage JVIerrihew, L 4 Sam. Crow, 2. 8. 4 Zachary Rider, 3.15 John Crow, Jr., 1. 1 'See Yol. I., 137. An interesting account of Mr. Richard Sears and family is given in the.chapter on “ The Pilgrim Fathers” in the third series of Vicissitudes of Families, published by Sir Bernard Burke, LL. D., Ulster King of Arms, etc., printed by Longman & Co., Paternoster Row, London, 1803. We shall advert to this again in our Annals of Chatham. 2 Mr. Judah Thacher, s. of Anthony, m. Mary Thornton, dr. of Rev. Thomas. Issue: Eliza., 1067, who became the 2d w. of Mr. Joshua Gee of Boston, Dec. 7, 1705 ; and after his d. m. Rev. Peter Thacher of Mil- ton, 1727; Thomas, May 18, 1669; Mary, March 17, 1671, who married Moses Draper of Roxbury, Nov. 13, 1692, and 2d, Joseph Grant of Bos- ton, Aug. 17, 1704; Judah, who d. inf.; Anne, Oct. 31, 1674, d. single; and Judah, Dec. 7, 1676. The date of Mr. T.’s decease we cannot give; but he was buried Nov. 7, 1676. He had two sons and three drs. then liv- ing, not of age. The wid. d. Nov. 30, 1708, aged 68, at her dr. Grant’s, and was buried on Copp’s Hill, Boston. Thomas, b. 1669, prob. went to Tolland, Ct. Judah, b. 1676, d. 1705, — a mariner, single, and Joshua Gee, his brother-in-law, ad. on his estate, May 20. 3 Mr. Thomas Howes d. in Nov. He is often mentioned in the rec- ords with the prefix of Capt. He was son of the grantee Howes, and ad. freeman 1647, and occupies a prominent place on the records, both as selectman and representative. By his m. with Sarah Bangs, dr. of Edw., 1656, he has issue: Rebecca, Dec., 1657; Thomas, May 2, 1663; Jona- than, Feb. 25, 1669-70; and Sarah, Oct. 2d, 1673.ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 195 Wm. Eldredge, 3.12. 3 Jos. Howes, 7.11 Josljua Allen, 1. 6. 9 Sam. Howes, 2. 6. 9 Sara. Hall, 4. 8. 9 Mrs. Prence, 1. 3. 4 John Hall, Sr., 3.10. 2 Nathl. Hall, 15. 5 Hy. Vincent, 5. 9.11 Jno. Whelden, Sr., 4. 6. 7 Kenel. Winslow, 4.13. 6 | Jerh. Howes, 7.14 Wm. Griffin, 3.10. 2 Edw. Sturgis, Jr., 6.14. 6 Wm. Chase, 3. 7. 2 | Thomas Folland, Sr., 5. 6 \ Peter Worden, 8. 2. 3 : Jno. Pugsley, 11. 3 Jos. Severence, 16. 3 | Joseph Benjamin, 2.13. 7 ^ Sam. Worden, 5. 1. 6 Jno. Thacher, 6. 6.10 Jno. Dillingham, 6.17. 9 Jas. Matthews, 3. Jno. Wing, 5.16. 3 Edm. Hawes, 4. 9. 5 Annanias Wing, 3. 6. 9 . Thos. Folland, Jr., 4. 3 Joseph Wing, 2.16 j Rd. Michall, 2. 2 John Baker, 1. 2 j Jerh. Jones, 2.14 Judah Thacher, 3.10. 2 ; Hannah Grey, 1.11. 3 Sam. Jones, 12. 4 Rd. Lake, 14. 4 Win. Gray, 13. 9 Jno. Hadaway, 14. 4 James Bursell, 2.12. 3 Edw. Crowell, 1.18. 6 Anthy. Fry, 1. 7. 6 Mary Sturgis, 1. 0. 7 Abisha Marchant, 1.15. 3 Jno. Fenny, Sr., 16. 6 Mr. Sunderland, 1.10 Paul Sears, 5. 8. 7 Mr. Thornton, 2.10 Silas Sears, 1. 8. 6 Sarah Matthews, 2. 1. 3 Mr. Mayo, 2. 4. 3 Joseph Hall, 3 Jas. Meker, 11 Francis Baker, 2. 6. 9 Nathl. Baker, 1.14. 2 Jno. Merrihew, 2. 2. 6 Thos. Gage, 2. 6. 9 And. Hallett, 13. 1. 3 Hugh Stewart, 12.15. 6 Hosea Joyce, 5. 7. 7 Jno. Chase, 12. 4 John Crowe, Sr., 3.10. 6 Danl. Baker, 13. 9 Wm. Hall, 1. 2 Jas. Claghorn, 2.15. 3 Zach. Paddock, 3. 7. 6 Nathl. Bassett, 2. 9. 6 Capt. Howes, 6. 7. 3 Thos. Borman, 1. 7 Jno. Ryder, 2.14. 9 Mrs. Gorum, 3. 7. 6 Jno. Hawes, 3.10. 6 Jabez Gorum, 2. 6. 3 Nich. Nickerson, 3.10.11 Jno. Matthews, 13. 6 Jno. Hall, Jr., 2.15 Jno. Burges, 4. 1 Elisha Hedge, 7. 8. 8 Jno. Marchant, 2.11 Edw. Sturgis, S \, 7.11. 3 Mr. Yesson, of Boston, 18 Abm. Hedge, 1. 7. 6 Total, £297 £297196 HISTORY QF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1 577, May 23, the first town-meeting the record of which has survived, was held, when Messrs. John Miller and Jere- miah Howes were appointed commissioners; John Whelding and Gorham Hall grand-jurors; Wm. Eldred and John Ryder surveyors; and Edmund Hawes, Edward Sturgis, Sr., Mr. Thacher, Mr. Miller, and Jeremiah Howes, selectmen. At a town-meeting, May 30, “the townsmen of Yarmouth did fore- warn John Wing and our neighbors of Sawtucket from purchas- ing any of our lands in the bounds of our township, of any Indians, or to take any possession thereof from them, as being contrary to court order.” Mr. Sturgis’ license to keep an ordi- nary was recalled by court. Mr. Judah Thacher’s estate was administered by his widow, Mary; and the wife of a prominent inhabitant hung herself, — the first suicide on record in these towns. Instances of self-destruction had not been so rare in the Massachusetts colony;1 but whatever the dis- comforts of life in new settlements, the principles and moral courage of the early settlers here had remained firm: “ To death we may with joy resort, As seamen from a tempest to their port; Yet to that port ourselves we must not force Before our pilot, Nature, steers the course.” In 1678. the names of the freemen of the town, on record at the May meeting, were: — John Burges, Joseph Hall, Jr., Samuel Hall, Thomas Hall, Sr., Edmund Hawes, John Howes, Jeremiah Howes, Jeremiah Howes, Joseph Howes, Sam’l Howes, John Miller, Zach. Paddock, Sr., John Ryder, Sr., Joseph Ryder, Zach. Ryder, ., Paul Sears, Silas Sears, Edward Sturgis, Je. Taylor, John Thacher, Peter Thacher, Thos. Thornton, Henry Vincent, Col. Winslow. Hn the Mass. Colony, “ Oct. 16, 1660, the court, considering how far Sa- tan doth prevail upon persons to make way with themselves,” in order to “ deter therefrom ” and “ to bear testimony against such wicked and unnat- ural practice, do order that such persons shall be denied the privilege of the common burial-places of Christians, and shall be buried in some common highway, and a cartload of stones laid upon the grave as a brand of infamy, and a warning to others.”ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 197 The subject of baptism had become at this time politically interesting; and the quiet of the pastor’s ministry was threatened by discordant views. The synod of 1662 had recognized the “half-way cove- nant.” “ Church members admitted in their minority, understanding the doctrines of faith, and publicly pro- fessing their assent thereto, not scandalous in life, their children are to be baptized.” To this view, con- sonant with the pastor’s practice when yet a minister of the Church of England, he still adhered.1 It is well understood that the prime idea of a majority of the first colonists of New England was “ the church, not the State.” They legislated, as they supposed, for the purity and prosperity of the church. The right of suffrage was limited with this intent, and all ele- ments that, in the apprehension of the government were hostile to pure religion, were thus excluded from political influence. “ Only the baptized and regener- ate,” — regenerate according to their views, — could be church-members; and only the children of church- members could, by their parents’ right, be baptized. Those baptized “ not joining the church,” their chil- dren were denied baptism; and not being church- members by baptism, without profession could not be freemen. The tendency of the synodal act had been to enlarge the right of franchise. In 1679, “ Select Courts ” being authorized for each town, Messrs. “Edmund Hawes, Ensign Thacher, Edward Sturgis, 1 The Rev. John Cotton, of Plymouth, writing, Aug. 28, 1678, to his brother-in-law, Mather, says, “ Mr. Thornton hath begun and practised the Synod’s 5 Prop., baptizing sundry. There are five or six dissenting breth- ren. I wish twenty of your book of the 1st Prin. de Bap. were in Yar- mouth ; they might be of great use to establish the unsettled.” It is Eer to say the action of the synod was an innovation upon the practice jrto, and led to much trouble. Mr. Mather defended the action of the synod. Ther i were able and zealous men on both sides; the controversy was earnest, :nd a flood of pamphleteering ensued.198 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. John Miller, and Jeremiah Howes were appointed to hold them here.” Messrs. Edward Sturgis, Joseph Howes, and John Hall, Jr., were appointed “ to collect the residue of Mr. Thornton’s salary, so he may not remain unpaid of his due, to the blemish of the town.” Such proceedings were not infrequent, but at this time were imperative by the enactments made in consequence of gen- eral neglect in the colony “ to promote the great object of pub- lic worship.” The annual stipend here, of £60, was payable,— a portion in money, but chiefly in the products of the soil.1 It was also “ordered and concluded,” May 11, “that every ratable oerson shall kill, or cause to be killed, six old black- birds, or crows, by the last of July next, or pay 2s. 6d. for the neglect; — the fine to be added to the rate of such as do not bring in the full tale of birds or heads to the men appointed to receive them.” In 1680, March 15, an agreement was made “with our neigh- bors, the purchasers or proprietors of the land between Stoney Brook and Bound Brook,” subsequently signed by Ananias Wing, Paul Sears, Kenelin Winslow, and John Dillingham, Jr., on the one part, and by John Thacher, Sam’l Howes, Thomas Sturgis, and Josiah Thacher in behalf of this town. In 1681, Mr. Rich- ard Berry died.2 In 1682, Aug. 12, it was ordered in town meeting, that no In- dian shall be permitted to gather pine knots, or run any kiln, or work about tar in any part of the township. In 1683, we catch a glimpse at the house for public worship, in its improved condition: “At a town meeting, May 16, it was ordered “that Capt. Thacher and the selectmen shall agree with a workman to finish the meeting-house, both within and without, so far as they shall see needful,3 * * * * 8—ceil it with boards, glaze the windows, mend the 1 The next year, Aug. 16, the town ordered that half the stipend be pd. in species ; the other part in Indian corn at 3s. per bu., and rye the same ; “ or in any other species (spesya) at the price our merchants do take at.” 2 Mr. Richard Berry was in Be., 1643, and soon after here. By his wife, Alice, he had b. in this town 11 children. The record, worn and torn, but partially reveals their names or dates. All that can be gath- ered is, John, March 29, 1652; Elisa., March 5, 1656. It is known, how- ever, that he had also sons, Richard, SamT, Nath’1, and Joseph; also a dr. Elisa., who m. Josiah Jones, Nov. 28, 1677. ' 8 The question, doubtless, often presents itself to the mind of any one ex- amining old records of similar improvements, whether the style and cost of “ the meeting-house,” ind ates the quality of the private residences.ANNALS OF YARMOUTH. 199 window-seats, and secure them from wet, underpin, YOL. II. 43338 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1861, Lothrop Davis Esq., who had been more than thirty years Register of Deeds for the County, and an efficient and faithful officer, died, June 18, aged 68. Mr. Freeman Crosby died, Oct. 28, aged 66; Mr. David Kelley, in Nov., aged 64; George Lovell Esq., Nov. 28, aged 74 j1 and Mr. Charles Jenkins, Dec. 27, aged 66. We must also record here the decease of a prominent and good man, Dea. Charles Scudder, Jan. 21, aged 73, who, though long known as an eminent merchant in Boston, where he died, was a native of this town, and sustained intimate relations with the Cape.2 Nor can we be so derelict as to pass unnoticed distinguished names of others born in Barnstable whose lamented demise appears on the bills of mortality. For, from remote times, even from the days of the Princes, the Lothrops, the Walleys, the Thorntons, and others early emigrating from the Cape, Boston, and man can expect to become eminent as a lawyer, who does not, for at least a score of years, or more, apply himself rigidly to his profession. The great Mr. Burke has said, “ The science of jurisprudence, the pride of the human intellect, with all its defects, redundancies and errors, is the collected reason of ages, combining the principles of original justice with the infinite variety of human concerns.” To this noble sentiment, reckless pettifoggers and aspirants for place are blind. The idea that the law is not a science, but a trade, has not only proved fatal to the hopes of many, but the temptation tc embark in politics in the gristle of youth, and without mental culture, Las already wellnigh proved the bane of the republic. To insure distinc- tion of place, men aspire to be leaders in collisions of parties, chief speakers in primary assemblies, and promoters of factions. Rash and hasty legisla- tion is the result of their success, — never “ approaching the faults of the State, as to the wounds of a father, with pious awe and trembling solici- tude,” as a great statesman advised, but with supreme regard to self. Mr. iScndderis example was the opposite of this. The engraving on the opposite page, has, at our suggestion, been yielded through the munificence of his brother, Henry A. Scudder, Esq. rMr. Lovell, b. July 17, 1787, long and extensively engaged in active enterprise, was a self-made man,— from cabin boy to master, merchant, and large ship-owner. 2 Dea. Charles Scudder was grandson of Eleazer, b. 1737, s. of Ebenezer, whom. Mary Lewis and had David Jan. 5, 1763; also Lydia, Wm., Eleazer, Daniel, and Mary. David Esq., b. 1763, was an eminent citizen, and .many years was Clerk of the Courts. He m. Desire Gage, and had Charles June 5, 1789, who set. in Boston; Elisha Mar. 9, 1791; Alexander Mar-12,1793, merchant in Boston; also Abigail, Lucinda, David, Horace, Frederick ..the present Reg. of Deeds, and Julia.ANNALS OF BARNSTABLE. 339 other places both within and without the State, have not ceased to be largely indebted to this peninsula foi? an influence that has tended largely to her progress and prosperity,— an influence always unostentatiously exerted, and generally acknowledged, though rarely credited with any reference to the nativity of the men, — whether in commercial enterprise, in the mili- tary defences of the country, in the pulpit, the judi- ciary, or elsewhere,—an influence that has, in fact, per- vaded the land, extending abroad to the remotest parts of the world, enlarging our national wealth and increasing our national influence. The Hon. Lemuel Shaw, for thirty years Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Mass., also died this year, Mar. 30, aged 80,1 2 In 1862, Mr. James Davis, also a native of this town died at his residence, in Boston, April 25, aged 84,— venerable and highly esteemed, a liberal, high-minded, honorable merchant; Capt. John Percival, U. S. N., one of the oldest officers in the service, — brave, kind- hearted, generous, patriotic, faithful, — died at his res- idence in Dorchester, Sept. 17, aged 84 f and Hon. Benjamin F. Hallett, long distinguished at the bar, and 1Hon. Lemuel Shaw, LL. D., b. Jan. 9, 1781, was s. of Rev. Oakes, the pastor of the W. Precinct, and grad. H. C. 1800. He m. 1st, Elizabeth Knapp, dr. of Josiah of Boston, and 2d, Hope Savage, dr. of Doct. Sam’l of this town. Issue: Oakes; a dr. who m. Herman Melville; Lemuel Jr.; and Samuel S. Having attained a high reputation at the bar, he was app. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1830, presiding with distinguished reputation as a jurist, longer perhaps, if we except Chief Justice Marshall, than any other man in the country. After a life of great purity, usefulness, and integrity, he died serenely, widely honored, greatly esteemed, deeply lamented. Through life he cherished a warm affection for his native town and county. Judge S. received the honorary degree of LL. D. at H. C. 1831, and Brown Univ. 1850. 2 Capt. Percival was early in the merchant service, but soon connected with the navy. During the last war with Gt. Britain, he was in several important engagements; one of which was between the Peacock and Epervier. His last cruise was in command of the Constitution in 1843. He left $2000 to the West Parish in this town, the interest to be appropri- ated to the payment of teachers of commoD schools.340 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. prominent in political life, died at his residence in Boston, Sept 23, aged 68.1 In this town Mr. Nathan Allyn died June 15, aged 49; Mr. Richard Kelley, June 18, aged 73; and Capt. Frederick Scudder, Dec. 30, aged 41.2 In 1863, Rev. Henry A. Goodhue became pastor of the Congregational Church at West Barnstable, May 20. Mr. James L. Lothrop died Feb. 10, aged 82; Mr. David Hinckley, April 24, aged 87; Mr. John Hamblen, April 25, aged 89: 2 : 16 ;3 Mr. Lot Eastabrook, April 29, aged 56; Matthew Cobb Esq., May 18, aged 75;4 1 Hon. B. F. Hallett grad, at Brown Univ. 1816. u As a politician lie was deeply versed in the science of government, and as completely master of the political history of his country. Whilst his legal attainments secured him a high position at the bar, his eminence as a debater and popular ora- tor made his name familiar throughout the country.” He was s. of Capt. Benj. Hallett who d. 1849. 3 Mr. Scudder was s. of Oliver who was son of Isaiah, b. 1768, the s. of Ebenezer. 3 James Hamblen was from London, and tradition says was bro. of Giles, one of the first settlers at Middletown, Ct., who also came first to Be. The name has been variously written — often Hamblin, and as often Hamlin and Hamlen. Some went early from here to Turner, Me.; others in various directions. To the Barnstable family is to be traced the lineage of the present Vice President of the IT. S. A. Mr. James Hamblen, who d. 1690, and his w. Anne, had James prob. b. in Eng.; Hannah; Isaac; Bartholomew b. in Be. April 11, 1642; John June 26, 1644; Sarah 1647; Eleazer March 17, 1649 ; and Israel June 25, 1G52. James Jr. m. Mary Dunham, dr. John, Nov. 20,1662, and had Mary 1664; Elisa. Feb. 13, 1665, who m. John Scudder July 31, 1689; Eleazer and Experience, gemini, April 12, 1668; James Aug. 26, 16G9; Jona. March 3, 1670-1; Eben’r July 29, 1674; Elisha 1677, d. inf.; Hope 1680; Job Jan. 15, 1681; John Jan. 12, 1683; Benj. 1685; and Elkanah. Bartholomew m. Susanna Dunham Jan. 20, 1673, and d. April 24, 1704, aged 63. They had Sami Dec. 25, 1674; John June 19, 1686; Ebn’r March 23, 1689; and seven daughters. John m. Sarah Bearse 1667, and had a large family, 9 daugh- ters, and sons John, Eben’r, and Benj. Eleazer m. Mehit. Jenkins 1675, and had Isaac Aug. 20, 1676 ; Joseph Nov. 20, 1680, who d. 1766; Mehit. 1682; Elisha 1685; Ichabod 1687; and Shubael. Israel, by 1st w. Abi- fail, and 2d, Jemima, had 4 daughters, and sons Israel, Joseph, and Jacob. oseph mentioned above m. Zervia Dillingham, dr. John of Sandwich, Feb. 8, 1798; and was a substantial farmer, militia officer, and good citizen. 4 Mr. Cobb was ling a well-known merchant in Boston. He began his business life in this, Vis native town, and was not only largely engaged in trade, but in navigat on and ship-building. He removed to Boston in 1836, but returned here ii . 1861. In various offices held by him here, as else- where, the duties we e discharged with ability and fidelity. An honorable man, a genial friend, a public-spirited citizen.ANNALS OF BARNSTABLE. 341 Mr. Jason Howland, May 25, aged 67; and Frederic W. Crocker Esq., June 11, aged 54.1 The great political question has been, for the last year or two, here, as elsewhere, Can the restoration of the constitutional relations between the United States and each and all the individual States be effected?” Each passing month has seemed pregnant with events that seal the destiny of a nation. This town has proved no exception to the general spirit of patriotism that pervades all hearts, truly loyal, in every community. The political agitations of the day though calmly viewed in all the loyal states, it was early apparent were not to be, as some had vainly hoped, “ Like fire that’s kindled in brushwood, And for a moment burns.” A nation must needs have its strength against domes- tic foes tested, to perfectly consolidate its power and secure permanent prosperity and peace. The problem to be solved is nothing short of this: Shall civilization, in its journey with the sun, sink in endless night for the gratification of such as would fain “ wade through slaughter to a throne; ” or shall the ordeal prove that these United States can not only govern themselves, but, this demonstrated, have strength to stand, even though the world beside were arrayed against them ? In the issue, the heart of no true patriot will fail. ' If latent treason lurk under the guise of loyalty, any and every measure that tends to the grand result will be opposed; but 1 Mr. Crocker, eldest son of Hon. David Crocker, who for many years was high sheriff, grad. H. C. 1829, and, the last ten years, was clerk of the courts for this county—a gent, whose tastes were literary, and somewhat poc deal.342 HISTOBY OF BABNSTABIiE COUNTY. Jove of country second only to love of God, the pre- vailing sentiment, will always sustain the right The grisis demands full loyalty, the ready fealty of all, the gordial and prompt support of those to whom sever- ally, as citizens, is committed the country’s defence:— u Pro rege, pro lege, pro patria semper.” Our,Annals of Barnstable are being concluded. May this ancient town ever occupy a position of prominence in the national patriotism; and may these pages be as favorably received by its dwellers as they are respectfully and impartially conceived. Many are they who, being scattered abroad, have been accus- tomed to look back to this “cradle of an honored race” as the place whence they themselves “have drawn the principles and habits that have made them prosperous and honored wherever they have gone to geek their fortunes in the wide world. To the hearts of others, it is hallowed by moving associations as the home of beloved parents or revered forefathers.”1 All such will scan these Annals with interest, and, we trust, with satisfaction. There may be important omissions noted by some readers; the author can only say they were not intended, and were unavoid- able. There will ever be much of history that can- not be written, but which is, nevertheless, a memory embalmed by kindred and friends. 1 Palfrey.ANNALS OF BARNSTABLE. 343 DEPUTIES. 1639. Joseph Hull, 1. 44 Thos. Dimoc, 8. 1640. Jas. Cudworth, inelig. “ Anthony Annable, 12. 1641. Wm. Thomas, 1. 1642. John Cooper, 2. 1643. Henry liowley, 1. xrs. 1643. Henry Bourne, 2. 1644. Henry Cobb, 9. 1645. Isaac Robinson, 2. 1646. Thos. Hinckley, 6. 1652. Nath’l Bacon, 13. lt>56. John Smith, 3. 1663. Jno. Chipman, 7. 1666. Joseph Lothrop, 15. Y«. 1692. John Gorum, 3. “ John Otis, 8. 1695. John Green, 1. 1700. Thos. Hinckley, 1. 1701. John Bacon, 2. 1704. Sam’l Hinckley, 2. 1705. James Hamblin, 1. 1707. Sam’l Chipman, 3. 1711. Joseph Lothrop, 3. 1712. Daniel Parker, 4. 1718. Sliubael Gorham, 20. 1737. Jno. Russell, 2. 1741. Sylvs. Bourne, 2. 1743. Robert Davis, 2. 1745. James Otis, 20. 1757. Edward Bacon, 8. 1763. Cornelius Crocker, 2. 1765. Nymphas Marston, 6. 1771. David Davis, 4. 1775. Joseph Otis, 1. 1776. Eli Phinney, 1. REPRESENTATIVES. zn. 1777. Eben. Jenkins, 3. 1780. Sturgis Gorham, 4. 1782. Shearj. Bourne, 7. 1783. Sam’l Hinckley, 2. 1786. Lot Nye. 3. 1790. Sam’l Smith, 2. “ Eben. Crocker, 2. 1798. David Scudder, 1. 1802. Isaiah L. Green, 1. 1803. Jonas Whitman, 8. 1804. Richard Lewis, 4. 1807. Eben. Lothrop, 2. 1809. Jabez Howland, 7. “ Joseph Blish, 2. 1810. Job C. Davis, 2. 1811. Nehe. Lovell, 1. 44 Naler Crocker, 8. 1812. Lemuel Shaw, 1. 44 Nath’l Jenkins, 3. 44 Wm. Lewis, 12. 1821. Nymphas Marston, 3. Yrs. 1669. Thos. Huckins, 9. 1670. Wm. Crocker, 3. 1672. Jno. Thompson, 2. 1675. Barnabas Lothrop, 7. 1682. Sam’l Allyn, 3. 1685. Shubael Dimoc, 3. 1689. Jno. Gorum, 3. 1824. Benj. Hallet. 2. 1830. David Hinckley, 8. “ Charles Marston, 4. 1831. Henry Crocker, 6. 1833. Zenas Weeks, 5. 18.4. Natli’l Hinckley, 8. 1837. Wm. A. Lewis, 1. “ Sam’l Pitcher, 2. 1838. Seth Goodspeed, 1. 1839. Daniel Bassett, 2. “ Thos. B. Lewis, 5. 1843. Josiah Hinckley, 4. 44 Job Handy, 2. 1845. Chas. C. Bearse, 2. 1847. Sam’l A. Wiley, 2. 1853. Edwin Baxter, 1. 1855. Rufus S. Pope, 1. 44 Asa E. Lovell, 2. 1856. John A. Baxter, 1. “ Nathan Crocker, 2. 1665. Nath’l Bacon, 1. 44 Tristram Hull, 6. 44 Jno. Chipman, 4. 1666. Jno. Thompson, 7. 1667. Wm. Crocker, 2. 44 Joseph Lothrop, 21. 1668. Thos. Huckins, 9. 1673. John Gorham, 4. 1675. Barns. Lothrop, 5. 1679. James Lewis, 5. 1680. Sam’l Ajlyn, 4. 1682. John Howland, 9. 1685. Shubael Dimoc, 6. 1714.*John Lewis, 2. “ ♦Joseph Lothrop, 3. 44 ♦John Baker, 7. 44 ♦Joseph Smith, 18. 1716. John Thacher, 8. 1719. George Lewis, 8. 44 David Loring, 10. 1720. Shubael Gorham, 12. ‘4 Joseph Hinckley, 13. 1723. Joseph Crocker, 6. 1727. Sam’l Chipman, 3. 1730. Benj. Crocker, 3. 1732. Col. Gorham, 1. 1733. David Crocker, 19. 1735. John Thacher, 4. 1738. Robert Davis, 14. SELECTMEN. 1740. John Gorham, 6. 1745. James Otis, 14. 1751. Matthias Smith, 2. 1752. Silvs. Bourne, 3. 44 Joseph Blish, 3. 44 Dan’l Davis, 25. 1756. Edw. Bacon, 12. 44 Isaac Hinckley, 5. 1762. Nymphas Marston, 11. 1765. Eli Phinney, 6. 44 Matthias Fuller, 3. 1772. Joseph Otis, 5. 1776. Eben. Jenkins, 3. 1779. Jona. Crocker, 5. 44 Thos. Crocker, 2. 1781. Eleazer Scudder, 1. 1782. Lot Nye, 3. 1783. Joseph Davis, 1. 1784. Eben. Bacon, 19. 1785. David Parker, 6. “ Joseph Smith, 10. 1791. Joseph Crocker, 10. 1795. David Scudder, 4. 1798. Nath’l Lewis, 3. 44 Richard Lewis, 29. 1801. Nath’l Jenkins, 7. 1805. John Davis, 8. 44 Jno. Crocker, 2. 1807. Jno. Bodfish, 10. 1813. Isaac Hodges, 2. 1815. Naler Crocker, 13. 1820. Lemuel Nye, 8. 1827. Asa Hinckley, 1. 1828. James Marchant, 3. 44 Chas. Marston, 8. 1829. James Smith, 2. 1831. Josiah Hinckley, 4. 4* Zach’s Hamblen, 2. 1833. Eben. Bacon, 10. 44 Stephen C. Nye, 4. 1836. Henry Crocker, 2. 44 Nath’l Hinckley, 10. 44 Samuel Pitcher, 2. 1838. Daniel Bassett, 10. 44 Lothrop Davis, 9. 1840. Zenas Weeks, 1. 44 James Lewis, 2. 1842. Seth Hallet, 2. 1843. Thos B. Lewis, 2. 1845. Thos. Stetson, 3. 1848. Chas. C. Bearse, 12. 1849. Fred. Scudder, 7. 1850. Chas. Lewis, 2. 1851. Robinson Weeks, 1. 1856. Luther Hinckley, 1. 1857. Nath’l Hinckley, 2. 44 Joseph R. Hall, 7. ♦From 1692, the time of the union of the two colonies, to the date above, we have been unable to find any records which show who were the selectmen during the interim. It is not improbable that some of the gentlemen previously named continued, by succes- sive elections, longer than the number of years named; it is also highly probable that some of those with the ♦ prefixed were in office earlier than the date of election given.344 RlSTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. TOWN TREASURERS * Yrs. 29. 7. 15. 3. 15. 1780. Joseph Otis, 1788. Jona. Crocker, 1797. Thos. Crocker, 1808. Jabez Howland, 1812. Naler Crocker, Yrs. 8. 10. 11. 4. 12. 1824. Jas. N. Howland, 1826. Josiah Hinckley, 1836. Calvin Stetson, 1843. Fred. Parker, 1847. Ferd. G. Kelley, Yrs 2. 11. 6. 4. 17. 1713. Eben. Lewis, 1741. John Otis, 1748. Robert Davis, 1751. Isaac Hinckley, 1765. Daniel Davis, 1644.tThos. Hinckley, 1660.iJoscph Lothrop, 1696.$Samuel Allyn, 1713. John Otis, 2. 1726. Nath’l Otis, 4. 1730. David Crocker, 23. 1751. Isaac Hinckley, 8. TOWN CLERKS. 1754. Robert Davis, Yrs. 1. 1762. Daniel Davis, 2. 1764. Edward Bacon, 7. 1771. Samuel Jenkins, 1. 1772. Josiah Crocker, 9. 1780. Eben. Bacon, 25. 1805. Jabez Howland, 8. 1812. Naler Crocker, 11. 1824. Jas. N. Howland, 2. 1820. Josiah Hinckley, 11. 1837. Calvin Stetson, 6. 1843. Fred. Parker, 2. 1844. Ferd. G. Kelley, 20. ♦Our tables of Treasurers and Clerks are unavoidably imperfect, running back in the one instance, as is seen, to 1713; and in the other, to the same date, except as we gather isolated facts aside from the official record of elections. These omissions we can best explain by a transcript from the entries on the first page of the oldest book of records to be found in the town clerk’s custody. It may be, as suggested in a note, p. 255, that some records “ were carried to Plymouth, and there lost,” but the following is au hentic: “At a meeting of the inhabitants of the Town of Be., June 30, 1736, John Thacher Esq. moderator, Then voted that the old Town-Book as to the articles contained in the same to be of future use, be transcribed by the Town Clerk, into a new book to be pro- cured by him with as much speed as conveniently may.” “ Barnstable Town Book, anno 1736, bo’t per David Crocker, Town Clerk.” “ The 15 Oct., 1649, ordered by the inhabitants that Henry Cobb, Isaac Robinson, Thos. Lothrop, and Thos. Hinckley do peruse the old Town Book and record such material useful orders as they find therein into the Town Book, and the rest in the old book to be cancelled by them.” “ This 18 Feb., lr>58, at a meeting of Thos. Hinckley, Hy. Cob, Isaac Robinson, and Thos. Loth- rop for perusing the old Town Book and recording such material useful orders as they find therein, into this Town Book, cancelling the rest, found in the order bearing date Oct. 15, 1649; In perusing whereof they find as followeth, viz:” Then follow grants, orders, lists of inhabitants admitted, and Indian deeds, but nothing from which may be ascertained successive elections. Doubtless much has thus been irretrievably lost that would be of interest in history. f The first article transcribed from the “ old book ” bears date 1644, attested by “ Thos. Hinckley, 8~.riba.” Ho was clerk many years. 1 We find orders copied into the above-named book that were attested by Joseph Lothrop in 1660, 1683, 85, ’86, ’88, ’92, and ’95. $ Samuel Allyn, as town clerk, attests orders 1695, »97, ’98, >99, 1701, ’02, ’04. ’05. He was probably succeed# 1 immediately by John Otis, but at what date is uncertain.THE ANNALS OF THE TOWN O F EASTHAM. “It is a bevebend thing to see ah ancient castle not IN DECAT 5 HOW MUCH MOBB TO BEHOLD ANCIENT FAMILIES WHICH HATE 8TOOD AGAINST THE WAVES AND WEATHERS OF time.”—Lord Bacon. YOL. II. 44 (346) ♦ TO SOLOMON FREEMAN, ESQ., OF BREWSTER, Three generations of whose ancestry, descended from our common progenitor Edmund, of Sandwich, were of Eastiiam ; viz.: John, the Assistant, his son William, and his son William ; from which last was Solomon, of Harwich, senator and judge, whose son Solomon, also senator, was the honored parent of HIM with whom now survives the name of sire and grandsire, (a name which, again transmitted, it was fondly hoped would long be borne by ONE just entered upon manhood with bright prospects, energetic enterprise, and character well worthy of the lineage, when,— alas 1 with deep sympathy we advert to the bereavement,— ‘By foreign hands his dying eyes were closed, By foreign hands his decent limbs composed, By foreign hands his distant grave adorned, By strangers honored and by strangers mourned,* his ashes finally r« urning to repose at home with kindred dust), these ANNALS are respectfully INSCRIBED by his friend and remote kinsman, THE AUTHOR.ANNALS OE EASTHAM. Almost from the time of the arrival of the May- flower in Cape Cod Harbor, Nauset was familiar to the early settlers at Plymouth, who often in their need re- sorted hither to procure the means of subsistence, as also for other purposes; but no attempt was made either to begin a plantation or purchase lands until the year 1640. At this time, “ the purchasers,” or “old comers,” as sometimes called, obtained a grant from the Plymouth Court of a tract extending “ from the bounds of Yarmouth, three miles from the east- ward of Namskaket, and across the neck, from sea to sea.” No settlement, however, was begun. The tract remained still unimproved, except by Indians, for sev- eral years. Inhabitants of Plymouth, in 1643, becoming dissat- isfied with their location, and contemplating a move- ment which involved the abandonment of their present position, turned their thoughts to Nauset1 Governor 1 Notwithstanding the favorable impression they had at first conceived of Plymouth, many of them objected: “ the position is disadvantageous; the harbor is not favorable; the town is in the neighborhood of one of the most barren spots in New England; and it is impossible it can ever become a flourishing and opulent capitol.” Thus they reasoned. See Mourt’s Rela- tion. Moreover, some of the inhabitants had already removed, so great was their dissatisfaction; and others had requested a dismission from the church that they might choose a more eligible location. It became, there- fore, a serious question whether, to prevent the church from being further weakened, and to save it from danger of total disruption, it were not better to remove in a li ady. Many meetings were held to confer on the subject. (347)348 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Bradford joined with others in proposing it for the commencement of a settlement anew, and a commit- tee was appointed and sent forth to explore the prem- ises and make report. Upon their return, the church applied for and obtained the consent of those who had obtained the grant of lands here in 1640. Still, some persons contended that the examination had been superficial, and that further exploration was ne- cessary ; and this led to the appointment of yet an- other committee, instructed to inspect the locality thoroughly, and then, if judged expedient, arrange with the natives for the purchase of the territory. Accordingly, “ Mr. Thomas Prence, John Doane, Nicho- las Snow, Josias Oook, Richard Higgins, John Smalley, and Edward Bangs,” — all of whom became subse- quently settlers of the town, “with Gov. Bradford and others,” repaired to Nauset and made a full and accurate survey. These gentlemen were unanimously of opinion that the place was not sufficiently exten- sive to meet the views of the Plymouth settlers in regard to both present accominor]ation and future in- crease for the entire company; but, nevertheless, thought proper to purchase of the Indians.1 Return- Fraternal feeling prevailed, but there was diversity of opinion. Some op- posed to a removal would consent rather than witness a dissolution of the church, — provided a better location could be found; others were resolved at all events to remove; and, finally, a compromise was effected, it being agreed that the church remove in a body, — provided the place selected shall be commodious for the whole, and for such additions as may be rea- sonably expected. 1 The purchase embraced lands claimed by Mattaquason, sachem of Monamoyick, and George, the successor of A spinet, sachems of NauseU Of the former they bought the tract called Pochet, with two islands lying before Patanumaquut, and a beach and small island upon it; also, all the land called NamskaJcet, extending northward to the territory belonging to the sachem George, except, ng a small island called Pochet Island, which the sachem reserved. Of George they purchased ail the land belonging to him, extending northward from the bounds of the territory claimed by Mattaquason, excepting a small neck lying by the harbor, on the E. side of the tract,— which neck the c om. promised to fence, that the Indians might use it as a corn-field. It was further agreed between the parties thatANNALS OP EASTHAM. 849 ing to Plymouth, their mission completed, they re- ported their doings, as also the conclusion to which they had arrived, viz.: that Nauset was not extensive as desired, and that it was too remote from the centre of the colony to be suitable for the seat of govern- ment. The church, for these and other considerations, relinquished the idea of removal as a body; but re- solved that such as are still intent on removal have liberty to do so, and begin a new plantation, — pro- vided they pay for the purchase made by the commit- tee in behalf of the church. In the meanwhile, a grant had been obtained of Court, as follows: “ The Court doth grant unto the Church of New Plymouth, or those that go to dwell at Nauset, all the tract of land lying between sea and sea, from the purchaser’s bounds at Namskaket to the herring brook at Billings- gate, with said herring brook, and all the meadows on Indians, the natural inhabitants of the place, shall have liberty to get shell- fish in the cove, and that they shall have a share of the blubber at any time driven ashore, the proportion to be determined by the English. At the same time, it being demanded, ‘ Who lays claim to Billingsgate V (which was understood to be all the land within the Bay, N. of the territory pur- chased of George), and the reply being, ‘It belongs to no one,’ the com. said, ‘ Then that land also is ours/ “ to which the Indians assented.” It is proper here to state that the lands at Billingsgate, being held many years without consideration made to the natives, were finally claimed by an In- * dian who presented himself as rightful owner. Of this Indian, calling himself Lt. Anthony, the town bought the tract, — extending from the northern limit of Nauset to a little brook, called by the natives Sapokonish, and by the English called Bound-brook; Anthony reserving only a small neck called Tuiiamnest. This latter transaction was about the year 1666. We may add here, that on the decease of sachem George, the inhabitants finding it inconvenient to have Indians located at both extremities of the township, made agreement with his people for possession of the neck of land at the mouth of the harbor; and for this tract, called Tonset, they, be- sides other considerations, secured to the Indians a position at Gesquoques- set, which the natives were to enclose for their own use. This was previ- ous to the transaction previously named. The inhabitants, in 1662, also purchased the fertile island of Pochet, that had been reserved by the In- dians at the first sale made by Mattaquason. Twelve years before the claims of the Indians were fully satisfied, the line between Eastham and the lands belonging to “ the purchasers, or old comers,” was settled; the Court determining that “the line shall begin at the river Namskaket, and extend to the Eastern Harbor.”350 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. both sides the said brook, with the great Bass-pond there, and all the meadows and islands lying within the said tract ”1 The associates for removing to Nauset, agreeing to the terms proposed by the church, and Mr. Prence having possession of the above grant, soon after be- gan the settlement, — the fourth town on the Cape.2 Situation and Boundaries. — Eastham is situated in lati- tude 41° 51/ N., and longitude 69° 56' W. from Greenwich. Its distance from Boston, following the main county road, is 94 miles;3 from Plymouth, 52 miles; and from Barnstable, 22 miles, E. N. E. Its original bounds gave it a territory of fifteen miles in length by two and one-half in breadth, having the Atlantic Ocean on the E.; Barnstable Bay and Namskaket4 on the W.; the herring brook of Billingsgate5 on the N.; and Monamoyick® on the S. But, by reason of dismemberment, its present boun- daries give a territory of only six miles in length, and two and one-half miles breadth, having the Atlantic on the E.; Well- fleet on the N.; Barnstable Bay on the W.; and Orleans on the S. and S. E. Natural Divisions, etc. — Although we are called, in re- cording the progress of the town from its incipiency to the pres- ent time, to note events that, for a period, pertained to a large territory embracing Eastham as it was, — including not only 1 ^ lis grant extended “ S. to Monamoyiek Bay, Eastern Harbor, or Great Harbor, as then sometimes called. At one end it was bounded by ‘ the lands belonging to the purchasers, or old comers/ afterward settled by the name of Harwich; and at the other by lands that were afterward em- braced in the incorporation granted to Truro, — the length being about 15 miles.” 2 “ The church at Plymouth,” we are assured, “ regretted their departure; for they who went out from her were among the most respectable of the inhabitants of Plymouth; and she viewed herself as a mother grown old and forsaken by her children, though not in their affections, yet in their company and personal assistance.” But, “ however the emigration might be lamented, it was, doubtless, productive of great good to the colony. It did not essentially injure the church at Plymouth, their places being soon supplied by others; and it eventually led to the settlement of all the lower part of the Cape, thus preventing the Indians there, who were yet a for- midable body in comparison with the few white settlers, from joining in any hostile attempts, if they were so inclined, against the English in the wars that afterwards ensued” in New England. 3 In a direct line, L e., by water, 66 m., it being S. E. from Boston. 4 Now Brewster. 5 Now Truro. 6 Now Chatham.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 351 Eastham as it now is, but Wellfleet as a constituent part of the old domain until 1763, and Orleans until 1797; yet, in describ- ing the natural divisions, face of the country, soil, etc., of what is at present Eastham, we must take this ancient town in its dis- membered state;—once extensive, for forty years after assuming its municipal charter the only township east of Yarmouth; for a century commanding in territory, in population, and in wealth; but finally despoiled of a large part of each by the springing into separate existence of valuable portions which it had long cher- ished, since numbered among the most important and opulent of the Cape towns. If Plymouth “regretted ” the loss of a few, but in her circumstances comparatively many, “ among the most re- spectable inhabitants,” when the little band took their departure for Nauset, “viewing herself as a mother grown old and forsaken by her children, though not in their affections, yet in their com- pany and personal assistance,”1 much more might Eastham la- ment the secessions that have made the town, in population,2 wealth, and extent, the least among its compeers. When Eastham was first peopled by English, its approach from the seat of government was relieved by only three settlements, Sandwich, Barnstable, and Yarmouth. The intervening distan- ces were either a wilderness in which no road was cut, but where were worn the foot-paths of natives; or Indian planting grounds, with here and there the dottings of their wigwams. Passing, at the present day, down the Cape below the ancient Matta- cheese, the traveller is introduced to the former seat of the an- cient Nausets, after journeying in an easterly direction from Yarmouth through Dennis, — whether by the ancient way over Scargo, or that by Nobscusset and Sursuit, to the Indian Sawka- tucket, now Brewster, and thence northerly through Pochet, now Orleans, leaving Potanumaquut, now Harwich, on the right. He finds the township in great degree a continuous plain, with now and then slightly rising grounds and corresponding depressions; the abodes of the inhabitants for the most part unprotected by shade- trees, bleak and exposed; and the soil generally sandy, requiring careful nursing to make it remuneratively productive. Still, there are portions of the township that are comparatively fertile, yielding large crops. The remark so applicable to other towns 1 Morton’s Memorial. 2 The settlement of Truro, commenced in 1700, was also by emigrants from Eastham.352 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. that the course selected for the county road presents to a stranger, in passing, the least favorable view of the soil, is pertinent here. Different parts of the township have distinctive appellations; but there can scarcely be said to be a village within its bounds; the dwellings are scattered. The Indian name of Nauset still inures to the northeastern portion ; the northwestern part, a little north of tie centre of the township,is Silver Spring; the portion a little southward of the camp-ground glories in a name unhistoric and less euphonious, Half-way Ponds ; the westerly part, lying west of the meeting-house, south of Great and Long Ponds, and north of Great-Meadow, rejoices in the name of Great Neck; the extreme southwest is Skaket. The post- >ffice designations are Eastham and North Eastham. So distinguishing a feature of the township are its super- abounding waters that we may most readily describe the place by reference to these. There are 8 fresh-water ponds. The most considerable is Great Pond, situated about one-fourth in. from the western shore, north of which pond the explorers landed Dec. 6, 1620, and spent the night.1 The next is Long Pond, separated from the former by a narrow neck only about 40 feet wide. The next largest is Mill Pond, about one-eighth m. from Long Pond and connected with the northern arm of Nauset Harbor. This small harbor, sometimes called Stage Harbor, was formerly the first opening into the beach affording any con- venient haven, that, in sailing from Race Point south, was to be found on the east side of the Cape. Its entrance was in this town, narrow and obstructed by a bar;2 but for many years it has been moving south and is now in Orleans. The harbor con- sists of two arms, one extending north, shallow and accompanied by about 200 acres of salt marsh protected from the ocean by a narrow beach ; the other reaching southwest, and denominated :See Yol. I. 80. More than half a century back, attempts were made to open a communication for alewives between this pond and the bay The channel soon closed. 2 On this bar was a depth of not exceeding 8 feet at full sea. The in- domitable enterprise of the people, in days long gone by, inspired the thought of uniting the ocean and the bay by a canal from near this point. The cherished desire, though encouraged by the lowness of the site and the consequent inconsiderable excavations required, has always been held in abeyance by the conviction that if such canal were cut and all proper appliances constructed, winds and waves will be inexorable,—permitting no canal long to exist as an enterprise of utility.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 353 Town Cove, having, in ordinary tides, about 14 feet in its main channel, and being secure against winds.1 On the west shore is a sandy flat reaching from Suet to the bounds of Wellfleet; it is about 1 m. wide, is bare, or nearly so at low water, and then, for about 3 hours may be traversed by carriages. Here there are creeks that, at high water, admit small vessels; but there is no good harbor on this side.2 The first of these creeks is what is called Great Meadow River, southwest of the meeting-house ; on the east side of this river, or creek, being a body of salt marsh. About \ m. south is Boat Meadow River, running from the southeast, with marshes extending from its mouth nearly to Town Cove, and leaving only a narrow ridge for a road. This marsh comes within 15 rods of the swamp at the head of the creek, or brook, denominated Jeremiah’s Gutter; and the land here is so low that tides have flowed entirely across from bay to ocean, completely insulating the northern part of the Cape. There are also several inconsiderable brooks that connect with the waters of the bay, viz., Indian Brook, which is in part the boundary between this town and Wellfleet, and con- necting with the harbor at Silver Springs; Cook’s Brook, f m. south, dry half the year; Snow’s Brook, 1 m. still further south, quite small; and 1 m. further south is Grape Swamp, which gives its scanty superfluous waters to the bay. On the eastern side of the township, in a comparatively fertile tract, the road lies across a small stream whose waters at low tide are fresh ;3 and in this locality are about 200 acres from which large quantities of Indian corn and rye are produced. We have not spoken very commendingly of the soil, as the 1 The cove answers well for small vessels. Whether it might not be made a good harbor by opening a sufficient passage to it from the ocean, is a question long time ago agitated. But, alas ! storms, winds, tides, choking sands, — these are formidable opponents of all such improvements. 2 The incessant action of the sea in producing changes m the shores is es- pecially noticeable here. Mr. Pratt has said, “ Large stumps are to be seen nearly a m. from the shore; and original peat swamps have been found from which fuel has been obtained. The unavoidable inference is, of course, that this flat was at some time a part of the upland long since washed away by the action of winds and tides. The shore on the other side of the town has been washed more than 100 yards in several places within the memory of some now living (1840), and a large peat swamp, which had been buried many feet deep in the sand, perhaps for ages, has been washed out in the bluff and is digged for fuel.” 3 Jeremiah’s Gutter may also be regarded as a brook. It is, however, only about 14 rods in length, very narrow ; and, indeed, there is little space for any brooks to run; they are al Tminutive. vol. ii. 45$u HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. reader is awftre ; £nd> to the eye of the traveller, this town would present a strange contrast with the productive bottom-lands or even table-lands of other sections of our country, and especially the prairies of the West. One fact, however, is remarkable,—that while other towns in the county can boast of superior farms, this town is the only one of the thirteen that produces sufficient grain for home consumption. More than this, — a thousand bushels of Indian corn are annually sent from this town to a market abroad; in years past, more than three thousand have been exported. Farmers were accustomed to raise, each, about 600 bushels a year.1 On the western side of the township, a beach nearly half a mile wide extends from the north line to Great Pond, and then stretches across the township to Town Cove. This barren tract, about 1,700 acres now bereft of every particle of vegetable mould, once produced successive crops of wheat and other grain. The soil here was, indeed, always light, but, nevertheless, suf- ficiently productive amply to compensate the little labor required upon it. In 1802, such had become its condition, that the sand, lodging in some places against the beach-grass, had been raised into mounds 50 feet high, where before no such elevations exist- ed. In other places, valleys and swamps had been filled. Wher- ever a strong-rooted tree or bush withstood the winds, the mass of earth adhering to the roots resembled a small tower. In other places, rocks, once covered with soil, were denuded, and, by reason of their incessant lashings by driven sands, had come to be white as if recently taken from the quarry. Billingsgate Point is on the west side of the township, about six miles from the main lands with which it was formerly con- nected. For many years it has been an island, the sea having broken over and washed away the intermediate isthmus so thor- oughly that, in two places, are channels of sufficient depth for small vessels to pass. It is a mere sandy island or beach. On this Point, so called, a lighthouse was erected, in 1822, greatly beneficial to the interests of navigation in the bay, and especially a guide to vessels that would enter the safe and commodious harbor of Provincetown. Other islands there are, but of little 1 One farmer has raised here in a single year 800 bushels, planting but 60 acres. The yield is generally from 35 to 45 bushels of Indian corn, per acre, and from 20 to 30 of rye. The land being exceedingly easy of culti- vation, little labor is required. “ Two boys with a horse, may easily culti- vate and hoe.tl ree or fen acres a day.”ANNALS OF EASTfiAM. m account. Thres other lighthouses were placed on the east o$ Atlantic side of ;he township, in 1838, that have proved of great advantage, especially to vessels coming from foreign lands and aiming for Boston harbor, as also to all vessels passing around the Cape. These lights are about three miles north of Nauset Harbor. Excepting a tract of oaks and pines, about one mile and a half wide, adjoining the south line of Wellfleet, no wood remains in the township. It was greatly unfortunate for Eastham that its forests were cut down. Had a prudent forecast prevailed, the stripping from the face of the earth the natural protection given against winds and storms would have been duly restrained by economical use, and a sufficiency of timber shades left for both protection and ornament, greatly to the advantage of both town and county. For want of such foresight and frugality, — “ Where dense forests reared their shady heads,” the relentless axe of the woodman came and felled a growth “ Coeval with the world, a venerable sight!” the fury of the winds, no obstacle interposing, now spends its force with desolating influence, and, having already devoted the scene to barrenness, threatens even greater encroachments.1 The business of the town is still largely agricultural, but also maritime. Some young men engage in the merchant service, sailing ships from Boston, New York, or other commercial ports; some vessels are employed in summer in bringing lumber from Maine, and in winter engage in the West India trade; but the fisheries are prominent. The whale-fishery has become a thing that was; the cod and mackerel fisheries are prosecuted. The benefits of the shell-fishery in Town Cove always formed an item of no inconsiderable profit.2 The mechanic arts are prosecuted as extensively as the convenience of the inhabitants requires. The wheelwright, the tanner and currier, etc., are here. Educational privileges are secured to all, — the district system 1 The only protection that can now be afforded, is the planting of beach- grass and the making of suitable enclosures. By these means, the inhabits ants, although they cannot retrieve what is already lost, succeed meas- urably in guarding the still fertile grounds which flourish amid deserts of moving sands. 2 The manufacture of salt has received attention; its history here, how- ever, would be on] 7 the repetition of its decline in other towns. In 1837, there were 54 salf works here, yielding 22,370 bushels. The cod-fishery, gave 1200 quintals; and the mackerel, 4,550 barrels.356 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. still prevailing. The town is divided into four school-districts, each district having a commodious school-house. The other public buildings are a Town Hall and a Methodist Meeting- house.1 2 * * * * * The inhabitants of Eastham are not less distinguished than others in the county for intelligence, industry, and enterprise; nor, it is to be hoped, do they fail to retain in good degree the habits and virtues that did honor to their ancestors. Progress of the Town, etc.—The settlement of the town, commenced in April, 1644, under favorable auspices,8 was so augmented by accessions, that ap- plication was soon made to the Colony Court for its incorporation; and, June 2, 1646, the result was re- corded in these words: “Nacset is granted to be a township and to have all the privileges of a township as other towns within the government have.” Thus recognized, a meeting of the inhabitants, duly con- vened, elected Nicholas Snow town-clerk, Edward Bangs town treasurer, and Josias Cook town consta- ble. There is no reason to doubt that those dismissed from the Plymouth Church were early organized, and acting in church estate at Nauset. Immediately after taking possession of their purchase in conformity with grant of court, they recognized the propriety of establishing and maintaining the public worship of Almighty God; and the meeting-house which they erected, although but twenty ft. square, with thatched 1 The old Congregational Society has become extinct, having recently dissolved after an existence of more than two centuries; and their meeting- house, the frame of which was put up in 1719, has been sold and appro- priated to a secular use. Sic mutant 2 The settlement began with seven families, in all 49 souls. It was fortu- nate that it had the countenance and assistance of such a man as Gov. Thomas Prence. His counsels and influence contributed essentially to its prosperity. The company was select; the leaders generally men of sterling worth, whose influence at the seat of government was always effective.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 357 roof, and ports in the sides of the building for use, should occasion require the use of muskets in defence, shows that they were disposed to be prompt in every duty.1 The Rev. John Mayo went from Barnstable to Nauset in 1646, and remained in the exercise of his ministry here nine years, until called to the 2d church in Boston. The first deputies from Nauset appeared at the General Court in 1647. Although there is a paucity of materials for a record of events during the time that Nauset was the discriminative appellation, there is evidence that successive migrations were close upon the footsteps of the pioneers.2 Secretary Morton tells us that “ divers of the considerablest of the church and town” of Plymouth “removed.”3 Passing over several years prior to the date of the plantation assuming a new name, with the mention only of the fact that Messrs. Josias Cook, Richard Hig- gins, Nicholas Snow, Samuel Hicks,4 * * and John Doane, represented the settlement during this period, at the General Court, we come to the act, by which, in 1651, it was “ ordered that the town of Nauset be henceforth called and known by the name of Eastham.” At this time, a fresh impulse seems have been given to the 1 It is said that* around this meeting-house, near the Town Cove, was laid out a burial-place, — still enclosed and containing some grave-stones desig- nating the resting-place of early settlers, but unused, for many years, as a place of interment. 8 As early as Aug. 1644, commissioners were appointed “ to lay out the farm-land gr. to Nathaniel Sowther, near Billingsgate.” What relation this measure had to the settlement of Nauset, we are unable to conjecture; unless, perhaps, it had reference to the grant made in 1640. 8 Richard Church, who was at Plymouth 1630, aged 22, removed hither 1649. He did not long remain, for his settlement was in Hingham. He was father of Col. Benjamin. 4 Mr. Samuel Hicks, s. of Robert, who came over 1621 and d. 1647, and his w. Margaret, who came over and brought with her children Eph’m, Sam’l, Lydia, who m. Edwd. Bangs, and Phebe who m. George Watson. He was in Plymo. 1643, but the ce came here. Samuel m. Lydia Doane, dr. John, 1645, and had Dorcas 7eb. 4, 1651; and Margaret 1654. Ho went to Be., thence to Dartm.$58 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. settlement; and, early the next year, 1652, “ a division of the common lands was made to the first settlers and new-comers orders were made for securing compliance with the requisitions of Court in regard to records of purchases of lands, divisions, ad- justment of bounds, etc.; orders regulating and legalizing u ear- marks for horses, cattle, and swine;” directing the constable to collect fines imposed by the town for negligence in attending town-meetings, on information given by the clerk, — the consta- ble collecting to have one-half for his services; and this year also occurred the first instance of the presentment at Court of any resident: “Joseph Harding was presented, June 3, for carrying, ‘in his uncle’s name, an Indian’s gun to the smith to be mended.” In 1654, “ the bounds between this town and lands belonging 4o the ‘purchasers or old comers’”—afterwards Harwich — “ were settled.” In 1655, the Rev. John Mayo, hitherto ministering here, was called to settle over the Second Church in Boston.1 The Rev. Thomas Crosby succeeded him, being “employed to conduct public service on Lord’s days;” to whom was promised a salary of <£50 per annum. At this date, for the first time, we get a glance at the freemen of the town; the list of legal voters, May 22, was,— 1Mr. Mayo was in Barnstable in 1639, and became ‘teaching elder* in the church of which Mr. Lothrop was pastor. His relation to the church liere is said to have been that of “ religious teacher ” — perhaps implying that he was not invested with the pastoral office. In Boston, he was inducted to the pastorate Nov. 9, 1655, and continued in.office until 1673. The Plymouth record says, “ Growing aged and unable to carry out his office, he removed again into this Colony, and lived near Yarmouth, and not long after fell asleep in the Lord.” Rev. Increase Mather, who succeeded him in Boston, has, with greater particularity furnished us with the follow- ing record: “ 1672, in the beginning of which year, Mr. Mayo, the pastor, likewise grew very infirm, insomuch as the congregation was not able to hear and be edified; whereupon, the brethren, the pastor manifesting his concurrence, desired the teacher to take care for a supply of the congrega- tion that the worship of God may be upheld among us.” Again, “ on the 5th mo. 1673, Mr. Mayo removed his person and goods to reside with his daughter in Barnstable, where, and at Yarmouth since, he hath led a private life, as not being able, through the infirmities of age, to attend to the work of the ministry. The — day of May 1676, he departed this life at Yarmouth, and was there buried.” Mr. Mayo preached the annual 'Election Sermon, June 1658. He, with his entire family, came from Eng- land. His wife Tamsen d. at Y. a wid. Feb. 26, 1682. Their children were Samuel, Hannah, Nath’l, Elisa., John, and Bathsheba. Hannah m. Nath’l Bacon of Be., and Elisa, m. Joseph Howes of Y.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 359 Henry Atkins,1 Stephen Atwood, Edward Bangs, Rd. Booshop, Daniel Cole, Job Cole, Josiah Cook, George Crisp, John Doane, Jno. Freeman, Rd. Higgins, Giles Hopkins, Rd. Knowles, John Mayo, Nathaniel Mayo, Wm. Merrick, Thos. Paine, Thos. Prence, Thos. Roberts, Joseph Rogers, John Smalley,8 Ralph Smith, Mark Snow, Nicholas Snow, Jona. Sparrow, Wm. Twining,8 Rt. Wexam, Thos. Williams,4 John Young. Wolves were not infrequent; the bounty on four killed in town was paid this year. In 1656, Mr. Edward Bangs, who was engaged in merchandise, was duly “licensed to draw and sell spirituous liquors.” In 1658, the rate ordered to defray the town’s expenses, £15.0.9, suggests the economy of the times.: lMr. Henry Atkins was in Yarmouth 1641; went to Ply., and in 1655 or sooner came here. He m. Elisa. Wells July 9, 1647, who d. Mar. 14, 1661-2; he then m. Bethia Linnel Mar. 25, 1664. Issue: Mary 1648, d. inf.; Sam’l 1651 ; Isaac 1654, d. inf.; Isaac b. in E. 1657; Desire 1665; John 1666, d. in inf.; Nath’I Dec. 25, 1667; Joseph Mar. 4, 1669; Thos. 1671; John 1674; Mercy 1676; and Samuel 1679. Nath’l, b. 1667, by w. Winifred had Nath’l Nov. 21, 1694; Henry 1696; Bethia 1698; Joshua 1702; Isaiah 1704 ; and Elisa. 1709. Joseph, b. 1669, by wife Martha, had Joseph Dec. 9, 1701; Martha 1711 ; Anne 1713; Paul 1716; James 1718; John 1721; Uriel 1722; and Hannah 1726. 4 Mr. John Smalley — the family name often written Small—was in Pi}". 1632; and was here with the first settlers. He had children b. in Ply., viz. Hannah June 14, 1641, who m. Jno. Bangs Jan’y 23,1661; John Sept. 8, 1644 ; Isaac Dec. 11, 1647; and Mary, twin to Isaac, who m. John Snow Sept. 19, 1667. The twins were baptized at Be. Feb. 27, 1648. See Annals of Harwich and Truro. s Mr. William Twining Sr. was in Y. 1643, and d. Ap. 15, 1659. Stephen, b. Feb. 6, 1659, s. of William 2d., m. Abigail Young, dr. John, Jan’y 13, 1082-3, and had Stephen Dec. 30, 1684; Eleazer Nov. 26, 1686; Nath’l Mar. 27, 1689; Mercy Sept. 8, 1690; and John Mar. 5, 1692-3. William, s. of Wm., m. Ruth Cole, dr. Jno., Mar. 26, 1689, and had Elisa. 1690; Thankful 1697; Ruth 1699; Hannah 1702; William 1704; Barnabas 1703; and Mercy 1708. William 2d is said by Mr. Savage to have been b. in England, and to have m. Elisa. Deane, dr. Stephen, and had Susanna Jan. 25, 1654-5; Joanna May 30,1657; Stephen Feb. 6,1659-60; and William. It is difficult to distinguish between the families of the 1st and 2d Wm.; but we apprehend that the wid. of the 1st Wm. was Anne, who d. Feb. 27, 1680, and that their dr. Elisa, m. John Rogers Aug. 19, 1669; and Anne m. Thomas Bills Oct. 3, 1672. 4 Sam’l Williams was in Y. 1643; a John, by wife Mary, had Elisa, in S. June 2, 1709; and Thomas of E. had Nath’l Apr. 24, 1655.360 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. For town officers’ wages, £3.4.0 u magistrate’s and com- missioners’ charges,. 2.5.0 tt a drum for the mili- tary, ....................3.0.0 “ deputies’ wages, . . 5.0.0 For Mr. Bangs’ going to Yar. on town’s busi. £0.3.0 “ Indians killing wolves, 1.3.0 “ freight of corn to Ply. 0.5.9 £15.0.9 In 1659, the military, “ armed and equipped,” had for officers, 44Mark Snow, Capt.; Jonathan Higgins, Lieut.; Jonathan Bangs, Ensign. The town’s proportion of troop horse ” was provided; Thos. Paine and Edward Bangs each “ agreeing to find a man and horse at his own expense, for two years.” Three was the number required of the town; we are not informed by whom the other was furnished. The following record appears this year: “Concerning those purchasers that have lands at Satucket, such as lie on that side of Satucket River next Eastham, shall be ac- counted within the township for the purposes of rates; but neither town shall have any proprieties in the same.” A rate was ordered this year, of £6.19.8. viz.: For the assessor’s wages, £2.14.0 ! For pikes, .... £2.16. 4 “ magistrate’s services, 1. 7.6 | “ record book, . . . 1.10 In 1660, the Court at Plymouth ordered that the proportion which the town shall pay for colonial expenses, shall be £2, the same as last year. Daniel Cole was licensed to draw and sell wines. Now, for the first time, freemen, by order of the Court, were permitted to vote by proxy in the elec- tion of magistrates, instead of being required to go to Plymouth for the purpose as heretofore ; a provision that must have been peculiarly acceptable to a town- ship so remote. The act required that all votes “ be taken in open town meetings.” In this we have evidence of the progress that was being made toward the enjoyment of that excellent form of government to which our country finally attained. Everything convenient and desirable, it is not to be supposed, could be the suggestion of a moment: “ Tantae molis erat condere gentem.”ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 361 It may often seem to the reader, in perusing these annals of the primitive settlements, that the lists of voters are limited, in comparison with what may reasonably be supposed to have been the numbers of residents. Such is the fact: but it must be understood that not all who were men of adult years were entitled to the right of franchise. The fathers of the colonies were extremely cautious in admissions to citizenship. Some, doubtless, found their way to every place, who were not worthy. This last remark finds corroboration in the fact that the present year certain delinquents must needs be punished. As the shades as well as the bright touches of a picture are necessary to a faithful view, so we may not omit to mention that, besides the fine of 10s. imposed upon one of the residents, five years before, “ for lying,” — which we hesitatingly passed by in its appropriate place,—one of £1 was now decreed by the ma- gistrate, upon another person, “ for slandering and belying his neighbors; ” and, the next year, the person first fined was mulcted in the amount of £1 for (what we may, without figure of speech, call ‘ a fish story ’) “ lying about a whale.”1 Mr. Richard Spar- row died this year, Jan. 3;2 and Mr. Joseph Rogers,3 Jan. 27, 1 The morality of this town was no doubt of high order; as unexception- able, perhaps, as that of any town whatever. * These incidents prove that every community is liable to excrescences. 2 Mr. Richard Sparrow was of Plym. 1632, here 1653, and, soon after, deputy. His will, Nov. 19, 1659, makes his wife Pandora and son Jonathan whom he brought with him from England, executors, and names beside, grandchildren John, Priscilla, and Rebecca. Jonathan, Esq., dep- uty and representative many years, magistrate, &c., as also early a military man, m. Rebecca Bangs, dr. Edwd., Oct. 26, 1654; 2d, Hannah Mayo, wid. of Nathaniel, and dr. of Gov. Prince; and 3d, Sarah Cobb, wid. of James of Be., and dr. of Geo. Lewis, Nov. 23, 1698; and had Rebecca Oct. 30, 1655, who m. Dea. Thomas Freeman of H. Dec. 31, 1673; John Nov. 2, 1656; Priscilla Feb. 13, 1658; Mary Mar. 10, 1659; Apphia Dec. 11, 1660, d. inf.; Jonathan July 9, 1665 ; and Richard Mar. 1 7, 1669-70. 3 The father of the above, Lt. Joseph Rogers, was some time in Dux- bury, then in Sandwich, and was here about 1655, and d. 1678. Mr. Savage says he was s. of Thomas, and was brought bv his father in the Mayflower 1620. His children were Sarah 1633, d. inf.; Joseph July 19, 1635; Thos. Mar. 29, 1638; Elisa. Sept. 29, 1639, who m. Jonathan Higgins Jan. 9, 1660; John Ap. 3, 1642; Mary Sept. 22, 1644; James Oct. 18, 1648; and Hannah Aug. 8, 1652. Joseph, b. 1335, m. Susanna Doane Feb. 4, 1660-1, and had Joseph Jan. 27, 1660-1. His wid. m. vol II. 46362 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. by casualty. Mr. Nathaniel Mayo, deputy, died early in 1661.1 In 1662, the town became possessed, by purchase, of Pochet Island, which, in the first sale, made by Mattaquason, had been reserved. The town also adopted stringent measures to suppress the sale and use of all spirituous liquors; the Court at Plymouth the same year ordering a tax on all liquors sold at retail. This town ordered that no white man or Indian shall furnish the con- traband, on a penalty of 5s. for each offence. It was also agreed that a part of every whale cast on shore shall be appropriated for the support of the ministry. In 1663, selectmen ,were first appointed, the Court having provided for the selection of capable men to be invested with certain municipal duties in every town. The population now numbered 275. Mr. Jno. Doane was commissioned “ to marry in Eastham.” as was also Mr. Josias Cook the following year. A feature of later times seems to have had an early develop- ment here the present year; this remote, quiet, orderly settle- ment being visited by some ‘fast young men’ from a neigh- Stephen Snow Oct. 28, 1663. Thomas, b. 1638, m. Elisa. Snow Dec. 13, 1665, and had Elisa. 1666 ; Joseph Feb. 1, 1667 ; Hannah 1669; Thos. 1671, d. inf.; Thos. May 6, 1672; Eleazer Nov. 3, 1673; and Nathaniel Jan. 18, 1675. Nathaniel Mayo, s. of Rev. John, was a prominent townsman; his will dates 1661, and was admitted to probate Mar. 4, the same year. He m. Hannah Prince, dr. Gov. P., Feb. 13, 1650, who m. 2d Jona. Sparrow. Mr. Mayo had ch. Thos. Dec. 7, 1650; Nathaniel Nov. 16, 1652; Samuel Oct. 12, 1655; Hannah 1657; Theophilus Dec. 17, 1659; and Bathsheba 1662, who m. Thos. Freeman. Samuel, eldest son of Rev. John, went from Barnstable to Oyster Bay, L. I., as is interred from a deed, given by the Sachem, of a site of that village to Mr. Leverich, Samuel Mayo, and Peter Wright, 1653-4, witnessed by Anthony Wright. Numbers went with Rev. Mr. Leverich from both Sandwich and Barnstable; and Mr. Mayo was owner of the vessel that conveyed their goods. Returning from L. Island, he removed to Boston in 1658, and d. there 1663. By the settle- ment of his estate, Ap. 26, 1664, it appears that he was a mariner. His est. was adm. by “Mr. John, the father, the widow declining.” By his w. Thomasine, dr. of Mr. Lumpkin, he had, b. in Be., Mary 1645, who m. Jona. Bangs of E. July 16, 1664; Samuel 1647; Hannah 1650; Elizabeth 1653, who m. Rev. Samuel Treat of E., Mar. 16, 1674; and b. in Boston, Nathl Ap. 1, 1658; and Sarah 1660, who m. Freeman. John, also s. of Rev. Mr. Mayo, by m. with Hannah Lecroft, 1651, had John Dec. 15, 1652; William Oct. 7, 1654; James Oct. 3, 1656; Samuel Aug. 2, 1658; Elisha Nov. 7, 1661; Daniel June 24, 1664; Nathaniel April 2, 1667; Thomas June 26, 1670, d. inf.; and Thomas July 15, 1672.ANNAiS OF EASTHAM. 363 boring town. We will pass over their names, not because they belonged to ‘first families,’ but inasmuch as their future was more honorable and respectable. They were evidently here 4 on a spree] — to use a phrase of modern technicality; the constable was ‘ at home,’ although they were ‘ abroad ; ’ and the result was an excursion to Plymouth and a fine of £2 10s. each in the case of two of the offenders, and £1 10s. each the other two, “for go- ing into the house of John Doane Jr. and behaving uncivilly, ran- sacking for liquors and setting up some scandalous verses.” In 1664, it was “agreed between Mr. Samuel Freeman and the town, that he will pay the rate for which the town is prose- cuted by the Court, — the town part of the expenses of govern- ment,— one-half in money, and the other half in peas and wheat; and, for so doing, he shall have the black horse running at large in Pamet, said horse being the town’s property; he also to serve as trooper for the town three years.” In 1665, Mr. Jonathan Sparrow was engaged as schoolmaster. It was voted that “ the sales and prices of liquors shall be gov- erned by the court-law ; ” also, “ that all horses belonging to the inhabitants shall be marked on the fore-shoulder with the letter E, to distinguish them from those belonging to other towns; ” and “ that all persons standing outside of the meeting-house during the time of public service shall be set in the stocks.” Gov. Prince, this year, ceased to be an inhabitant of Eastham and returned to Plymouth; it being declared by the Court indispensable for the administration of public affairs that the governors reside at the seat of government.1 1 Gov. Thomas Prince, b 1600, came over in the 2d ship, the Fortune, Nov. 1621, then aged 22. His residence was first at PI) ;LUUUlh, then, 1335 at Dux., then, 1644, here. In the division of cattle in Plymouth, 1627, his w. and dr. Rebecca are mentioned. His wife was Patience, dr. of the elder, Wm. Brewster, m. Aug. 5, 1624, being, it is said, tEe ninth marriage in the colony. There are contradictory statements in regard to subsequent matri- monial connections; but it is generally agreed that he m. 2d, Mary, dr. of Wm. Collier, 1635. Judge Mitchell, who has reputation for accuracy, says “ she d. in Eastham.” It is said that he m. 3d, Mary, widow of Samuel Freeman. It is remarkable that doubt and perplexity have continued to attend all investigations touching this matter. Gov. P. d. “ governor of the jurisdiction of New Plymouth, March 29, 1673, aged 73, and was bu. in Plymouth April 8,” his wid. surviving. According to Yarmouth records, she died December 9, 1695, and was buried at N. Dennis. The children of Gov. P. were 1, Thomas, who m. and d. in England whilst yet a young man,364 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1666, Mr. John Freeman was elected assistant to Gov. P. The claims of the Indians are said not to have been fully adjusted until this year. In 1667, the town ordered that every housekeeper shall kill, or cause to be killed, twelve blackbirds, or three crows; a requi- sition continued for many years, as in other towns, to which we need not again refer. In 1668, Francis wields the sceptre as Sachem of Nauset, — the dignity of the office being the same as in the early days of Aspinet; but its power and impor- tance much diminished. A census was completed of “ all male inhabitants between sixteen and sixty years old, capable of bearing arms.” In 1670, the town voted “forasmuch as it appears to be greatly inconvenient for the minister to be trou- bled to gather in the rates for his maintenance, and is also an occasion of prejudicing some persons against him and his ministry, two meet persons be appointed to take care to gather in the maintenance and to leaving a wid. and dr. Susannah, who d. without issue. She is mentioned in Gov. P's will, and in 1677 is styled “of Cathaen Gate, near the Tower, single-woman.” (It is said also that Gov. P. “ had a maiden sister Susan- nah living at St Catharine's Gate, near London Tower.”) 2, Rebecca, who m. Edm. Freeman Jr., of Sandwich, April 22, 1646 ; 3, Hannah, who m. Nath'l Mayo, of E.,Feb. 13, 1649-50, and 2d, Jona. Sparrow; 4, Mercy, who m. John Freeman of Sandwich, afterward of E., Feb. 13,164^-50; 5, Jane, b. Nov. 1, 1637, who m. Mark Snow Jan. 9,1660, she being his 2d wife; 6, Mary, who m. John Tracy of Dux.; 7, Elizabeth, who m. Arthur Howland Jr. of Marshfield, Dec. 9, 1667; 8, Sarah, who m. Jeremiah Howes Jr. of Yarmouth, 1650 ; and 9, Judith, who m. Isaac Barker of Dux. Dec. 28, 1665, and 2d, Wm. Tubbs of Pembroke, 1691. Gov. P. had many difficulties to encounter during the time that he held the office of chief mag- istrate, but it is generally conceded that there was much in his administra- tion to be commended. Its fault was, in the estimation of those that reprehend, “ the fault of the age, — the lack of a full and just toleration on religious subjects.” His contemporaries say, “ He was a terror to evil- doers, and he encouraged ail that did well.” The Plymouth Church records say, “ He was excellently qualified for the office of governor. He had a countenance full of majesty.” Gov. P.'s farm in this town was extensive, embracing some 200 acres of the best land. The celebrated pear-tree, said to have been brought from England and planted here with his own hand, yielded “ about 15 bu. a year of fair and pleasant fruit '* long after becom- ing remarkable for its longevity. What yet remains of it indicates the spot where his house stood.ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 365 incite the people to duty in this respect.” This order was, doubtless, suggested by a law just enacted by the Court — of general application. Stringent enactments were also made by the Court to correct any neglect of a town in securing pastoral oversight; but this year the service of Rev. Mr. Crosby terminated.1 In 1671, the town voted to contribute £6 for the support of Harvard College, the ministers and elders in the several towns having been requested to raise money for the object. The town forbade all persons cutting wood or timber to be carried abroad. Mr. William Merrick died March 20;1 and Mr. Nicholas Snow died Nov. 15.3 1 Rev. Thomas Crosby was probably eldest son of Simon of Camb., and b. 1634 in Eng.; being an infant when he was brought over. He grad. H. C. 1653. For what cause his ministry here terminated, we are not informed. He was in good repute in all the colony. Mr. C. was here, however, as a “religious teacher”; not pastor. Nice distinctions pre- vailed. His descendants have been highly respectable. He d. in Boston June 13, 1752. By his w. Sarah, he had Thomas b. here April 7, 1663 ; Simon July 5, 1665, who removed to H.; Sarah Mar. 24, 1667, whom. Silas Sears jr.; Joseph Jan. 27, 1668-9, who removed to Y.; John and another s., gem., Feb. 11, 1670-1, the latter d. inf, and the former set. in H.; William March 1673 ; Eben’r March 28, 1675; Anne, Mercy, and Increase, triplets, April 14 and 15, 1678, the former of whom m. Wm. Luce of Tisbury July 5, 1704; and Eleazer Mar. 30, 1680, who set. in H. Mr. Crosby’s wid. m. 2d, Mr. John Miller of Y. Eben’r had Thankful 1701; Mercy 1703 ; and Eben’r May 5, 1706, who m. Mehit. Baker 1733. 2 The father of the above, Ens. Wm. Merrick (the name now gener- ally written Myrick), was prob. early in Dux.; a William of Dux. became one of the first proprietors of Bridgewater, but soon removed. The pre- sumption is that the Ensign was the son of that William. Be it as it may, he had by his wife Rebecca, William Sept. 15, 1643 ; Stephen May 12, 1646; Rebecca 1648; Mary, Nov. 4, 1650, who m. Steph. Hopkins May 23, 1667; Ruth 1652; Sarah Aug. 1, 1654, who m. John Freeman, Dec. 18, 1672; John Jan. 15, 1656-7 ; Isaac Jan. 6, 1660-1; Joseph June 1, 1662; and Benj. Feb. 1, 1664-5. William, b. 1643, m. Abigail Hop- kins, dr. of Giles, May 23, 1667, and had Rebecca Nov. 28, 1668; and William August 1, 1670. He d. Mar. 20, 1671. Stephen, b. 1646, m. Mercy Bangs, dr. Edward Dec. 28, 1670, and had Stephen Mar. 26, 1673. 8 Nicholas, Anthony, and William Snow are reported to have come over early. The two former brought families; the latter was an apprentice, and set. in Dux. Anthony was first at Plym.; then, 1642, at Marshfield; and Nicholas, who came in the Ann 1623, and had share in the division of land at Plym., set. here. He was one of Prince’s associates; a man of much note, — deputy, town cl’k, selectman, etc. many years. His wife was Constance, dr. of Stephen Hopkins, and she d. a widow, 1677. They had a large family, of whom Mark, b. May 9, 1628, was, probably, the eldest.366 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Until 1672, the inhabitants had not felt that their ability was adequate to the full support of a pastor; but a call was now extended to Mr. Samuel Treat who accepted and was ordained. The provision made for his support was a salary of £50, “with a sufficiency of firewood brought to his door yearly; a parcel of meadow and upland given to the town by Manasseth Comp- ton, Indian ; a parcel of meadow bought of John Young; three acres of meadow called the White Meadow; an island at Bil- lingsgate with the meadow about it; a parcel of marsh at Great- meadows ; and twenty acres of upland at the head of the Cove,” — all which lands were in fee simple. It was also “ stipulated that the town will build upon this latter estate a suitable house.” Such was the settlement, and such the salary; apparently liberal for the times. But as there were within the limits of Mr. Treat’s charge many Indians, he also received aid, in addition to the town’s agreement, from the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel among the Indians.1 2 Mr. Josias Cook d. Oct. 17, 1673.* In 1674, the town having raised the requisite number of men, as enjoined by order of Court, for service against the Narragan- setts, or other Indians, £70 was appropriated by the town for the purchase of guns and ammunition. The sum subsequently raised for the pay of the men was £66.16.6. In 1675, “King Philip’s War” being in progress,the town was required to furnish eighteen men additional, as its proportion of the three hundred ordered to be raised by the Plymouth Colony. Eastham performed its full share of duty in this war;3 and, though remote 1 Mr. Treat applied himself to learn the Indian language, and much of his time was given to the benefit of this portion of his charge. It has been said that he stands “ deservedly next to Mr. Eliot for his devotion to his work and success in improving the condition of the natives. Never weary, he travelled to other parts to preach to native tribes and to awaken Chris- tian people to a sense of duty toward them.” 2 Mr. Cook was one of the founders of E. By m. with Elisa. Deane, wid. of Stephen, Sept. 16, 1635, he had Josiah; Ann, who m. Mark Snow Jap. 18, 1655 ; and Bethia, who m. Joseph Harding, Ap. 4, 1660. 3 Mr. John Freeman *was at this time a captain, and of the Colonial Council of War. In a letter addressed to Gov. Winslow, he says : “ Taun- ton, 3 d., 4 mo., 1675. This morning three of our men are slain close by one of our courts of guard, (two of them, Samuel Atkins and JohnANNULS OF EASTHAM. 367 from the scene of action, and hitherto exempt from the ravages perpetrated elsewhere, was not without serious apprehension of danger. A view of the growth of the town may be inferred from the record of inhabitants “admitted” since the report we gave of legal voters, 1655. John Bangs, Jona. Bangs Sr., Joshua Bangs, Israel Cole, Daniel Doane Sr., John Doane, Jr., Edm. Freeman, John Freeman Jr., Sam’l Freeman Sr., Sam’l Freeman Jr., Thomas Freeman, Joseph Harding,1 Benj. Higgins, Jona. Higgins Sr., Jona. Higgins Jr., Thomas Higgins, Joshua Hopkins, Stephen Hopkins Sr. Sam’l Mayo Sr., Wm. Merrick Jr., John Paine, Thomas Paine Jr., Isaac Pepper,2 John Rogers, Thomas Rogers, Samuel Smith, Thomas Smith, Nicholas Snow, Stephen Snow, Jno. Sparrow, William Walker.3 Knowles, of Eastham); houses are burned in our sight; our men are picked off at every bush. The design of the enemy is not to face the army, but to fall on us as they have advantage.” He further says: “ I pray you send some arms to us, if you can, and some to our southern towns; Eastham has, I think, not twenty good arms in it. I pray you give them instruction how to manage things for their security, for they much need help.” It was well known that emissaries of Philip had visited all the Indian tribes on the Cape, and, although no actual demonstrations had been made by Cape Indians, there was much anxiety felt lest they should prove hostile. 1 We are told that “ Wid. Martha Harding d. in Plym. 1G33, and left her young son, John, to Dea. Doane.” We know nothing more of Dea. Doane’s ward; but Joseph Harding was made a freeman here, and m. Bethia Cook, Ap. 4, 1660. Issue; Martha Dec. 13, 1662, who m. Samuel Brown Feb. 19, 1683; Mary 1665; Joseph July 8, 1667 ; Josiah Aug. 15, 1669; Mezeiah Nov. 1, 1671 ; John Oct. 9, 1673, who d. June 14, 1697 ; Nath’l Dec. 25, 1674; Joshua Feb. 15, 1675; Abiah Jan. 26, 1679; and Sami Sept. 1, 1685. Josiah, b. 1669, had by his w. Hannah, Martha 1693; Elisa. 1696 ; Joshua Oct. 27, 1698; Bethia 1701 ; Josiah Mar. 7, 1703-4; Mary 1707 ; Jesse Mar. 26, 1709 ; Eben’r July 20, 1712; and Bethia 1716. Mezeiah, b. 1671, had by Hannah, his w., Hannah Feb. 15, 1694; Thomas Nov. 3, 1699 ; James Nov. 2, 1702 ; Mary 1706 ; Elisa. 1708 ; Phebe 1710; Nathan Oct. 29,1711; and Cornelius Mar. 31,1716-17. a Mr. Isaac Pepper is sup. by Mr. Savage to be s. of Robert of Roxbury. He m. Apphia Freeman Oct. 7, 1685, and had Apphia 1687 ; Mary 1690; Isaac July 29, 1693; Robert Feb. 15, 1695-6; Elisa. July 11, 1698; Joseph Nov. 1, 1700, d. y.; Solomon Jan. 15,1703 ; and Josepn Feb. 24, 1704-5. 8 Mr. William Walker can^e over 1635, se. 15; was in Hing. 1636; and was here m. to Sarah Snow Jan. 25, 1654-5. They had John Nov. 24, 1655, killed by Indians 1676 ; William Oct. 12, 1657, d. inf.; William368 niSTORT OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1676, the town raised, as its proportion for defraying the expenses of the war, £125.8.3. Mr. Jona. Bangs was empowered to act as agent for the town in reference to “ a misunderstanding between this and other towns on the Cape, growing out of the charges for the war.” The old meeting-house having become decayed, and being insufficient to accommodate the increased number of inhabitants, it was “ voted to build a new house near the burial place ; ” for this purpose £153.8 was appropriated, and Dea. Samuel Freeman, Lt. Spar- row, Thomas Paine, and John Doane were appointed a building committee. The population this year was 520. In 1677, additional lawshaving been enacted “for securing in every town suitable maintenance of public worship; ” and In 1678, an Act being passed “ still further to pro- mote ” the same, requiring that “ there be a place for public worship provided, and repaired or enlarged as occasion may exist, and that if there be any neglect it shall be done by the government, and the delin- quent towns assessed for the expense ; ” it was here determined that “the inhabitants of Monamoyick ought to pay their proportional part both of the expense of building and of Mr. Treat’s salary.”1 Lands were this year “ divided to both old and new Aug. 2, 1659; Sarah 1662; Elisa. 1664; and Jabez July 8, 1668. Ja- bez, by his w. Elisa., had Richard June 1, 1695 ; Rejoice May 13, 1697; Mary 1699; Jeremiah May 17, 1702; Mercy 1704; Jabez; Sarah; and Patience. 1 Monamoyick was not within the bounds of Eastham; but as the inhabi- tants of the former place enjoyed the privilege of attending here, in the absence of any legal provisions for the ministry in their own settlement, it was considered reasonable that they assist in sustaining religious institutions here. This led to a movement on the part of Monamoyick for more enlarged privileges. It may here be remarked that Eastham being the only township below Yarm., Mr. Treat was in the habit of performing paro- chial duties both in Monamoyick and within the bounds of Truro. Indeed, he seems to have considered the whole Cape below Yarmouth as his charge.ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 369 comers ” ; and provision was made for continuing the school. Mr. Edward Bangs 1 died this year; also, April 13, Mr. James Rogers;1 2 and, this same year, Mr. Joseph Rogers. In 1679, “Select Courts” being established by law, Capt. Jona. Sparrow, Mr. Mark Snow, and Mr. John Doane were commissioned to hold them in this town. In 1680, complaints being made that Indians were doing much damage to the town’s commons by cutting pine-knots to make tar, and thus injuring the timber-trees, measures were taken to prevent the like trespass in the future. In 1681, it was “ ordered that the ranks of the military com- pany shall be filled by all such of the inhabitants as are compe- tent to bear arras, each soldier to be furnished with a sword or cutlass as well as a gun; ” and that each Sunday one part of the company go armed to public worship. It was also ordered that a committee, chosen for the purpose, divide, among the freemen of the town, the money to be received as this town’s proportion of the sales of Mount Hope. The deputy from the town was instructed to apply for the money. In 1682, Indian constables were appointed for the Indians; and, in 1683, an overseer, agreeably to the late provision of Court, to determine controversies that may arise among them. The In- dians were also required to pay taxes; also to assemble when called, once a year, to hear the criminal laws read and explained. In 1684, the second instalment of the proceeds of Mt. Hope was subject of order. A census taken reported 101 freemen, or legal voters. The entire population was 900. In 1685, according to the testimony of Gov. Hinckley, there were 500 adult Indians within the limits of Mr. Treat’s parochial 1 See Yol. I. 639, where we have already given a genealogical sketch of the family. Whilst resident at Plymouth, fourscore acres were granted him, “ on condition that he contribute ^th part toward building a barque of 40 or 50 tons.” He was largely engaged in merchandise. See also Annals of Brewster. 2 Mr. James Rogers was s. of Lt. Joseph, who also d. this year. He m. Mary Paine Jan. 11, 1670-1, and had James Oct. 30, 1673; Mary 1675; and Abigail, 1678. John, s. of Lt. Joseph b. 1642, m. Elisa. Twining, dr. Wm., Aug. 19, 1669, and had Samuel Nov. 1, 1671, d. inf.; John Nov. 4, 1672; Judah Nov. 23, 1677; Joseph Feb. 22, 1679; Elisa. 1682; Elea- zer May 19, 168 ; Mehit. 1687; Hannah 1689; and Nathaniel Oct. 3, 1693. VOL. II. 47310 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. ‘charge.1 It was voted to “pay £10 for the head of any old wolf, and £5 for wolves’'whelps, to any Indians who shall kiH them.” The next year the bounty was doubled, the ravages of wolves among the herds having become a serious grievance. This year, Barnstable County established, the town was required to send grand-jurors to the Be. Court.2 The year 1686 brought some excitement by reason of the accession of Andros to power. Dea. John Doane d. Feb. 21, aged 95,3 and Mr. Rt. Wixam d. in the month of October.4 Mr. Wtlliam Freeman d. 1687;5 and Ens. Vm. Merrick d. in 1688. In 1689, Mr. Jona. Sparrow was commissioned as one of the justices of the Associate Court, restored upon the abdication of Andros. In 1690, the war with the Indians and French in Canada making it necessary that all towns within the governments of Plymouth, Mass., and Connecticut colonies furnish proportionate 1 Gov. H., in cor. with the Society in Eng., says, Mr. Treat had, under him, at this time, four Indian teachers who read, on Sundays, to separate villa- ges, sermons written by himself. Eveiy fourth Sunday, Mr. Treat himself preached to them collectively. The Indian teachers also acted as school- masters. It is said to have been “ a favorite object with Mr. T. to en- courage the Indians to choose magistrates for themselves, and to order their affairs wisely.” a As facilities for litigation were increased, so the business of the courts multiplied. Besides the indictments mentioned pp. 310-11 of former vol., an inhabitant was indicted, fined 5s., and set in the stocks, “ for cursing and swearing,” and 5s. and stocks two hours, “ for drunkenness.” 8 Dea. Doane, in Plymouth 1630, the associate of Gov. Prince, Assistant 1633,—but not after, he “declining civil office after being chosen dea.,”— was one of the founders of E. He had, by his wife Abigail, children : Abi- fail Jan. 13, 1632, who at the age of 60 became the 2d wife of Samuel iOthrop and outlived him many years. A century sermon was preached in her room in 1732 by Rev. Joseph Lord. She d. Jan. 23, 1735; John, Daniel, Ephraim, and Lydia who m. Samuel Hicks. Dea. D. had a very large farm in this town, JN. of the harbor, and, it is said, the remains of the cellar, near the water, now indicate the location of his house. 4 Mr. Wixam (sometimes written Wickson, -and sometimes Vixon), had Jemima 1655 ; Titus Dec. 2, 1657 ; Elisa. 1660; and Barnabas, who, by Sarah, had Barnabas Sept. 15,1693; Joshua March 14,1695; Lydia 1697; Robert May 29, 1698 ; and Prince Dec. 2, 1700. B Mr. Wm. Freeman, b. 1663, s. of Maj. John, had by his w. Lydia 2 children: Lydia, who m. Rd. Godfrey 17(11; and Wm. Feb. 24, 1686, who m. Mercy Pepper 1711. The above Wm. is the great-great-grandfather of the present Solomon freeman Esq. of Brewster.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 37jl parts of the means of carrying on the war, this town raised its quota of money, £'187 19s.; and the military was organized: Jona. Sparrow,captain; Joseph Snow,lieutenant; and Jona. Bangs, en- sign. Subsequently, the war requiring additional aid, this town was further assessed in the sum of £46. Pursuant to order of Court, the town assembled to express their views in regard to a new patent from the crown. Although the people may have preferred that the old colony government be continued as from the first, the vote was unanimous that such patent be sought, and that this town pay its proportion of the expense of obtaining it. Lt. Jabez Snow d. Dec. 27.1 In 1691, the town provided for the new levy for paying expenses of the war, as was ordered by the Court sitting for the last time at Plymouth. It also mortgaged to Mr. John Freeman two islands at Bil- lingsgate to indemnify for advancing <£76, the town’s proportion of expenses attending the application for the new Charter. Such were the necessities of the times at this period that a watch was ordered, to con- sist, each night, of as many persons as the selectmen shall think proper. Mr. John Young d. Jan. 29 ;2 Mr. Benjamin Higgins d. March 14;3 and Mr. Samuel Brown d. Dec. B.4 1 Lieut. Snow, a prominent townsman, had, by his w. Elisa., Jabez Sept. 6, 1670 ; Edward March 26, 1672 ; Sarah Feb. 26,1673-4 ; Grace Feb. 1, 1675-6 ; and Thomas who d. 1697. 2 Mr. John Young was here early. He m. in Plymouth Dec. 13,1648; and, by his w. Abigail, had John Nov. 16, 1649 ; Joseph Nov. 12,1651, d. inf.; Joseph Dec. 1654; Nathaniel Ap. 1656; Mary 1658; Abigail 1660; David Ap. 17, 1662; Lydia 1664; Robert 1667 ; Henry 1669, d. inf.; and Henry March 17, 1672. a Mr. Higgins, b. 1640, was s. of Richard 1st. Richard Higgins, in Plymouth 1633, to E. 1644, was of Celtic origin. The name is early found written Higginson. He was deputy several years. He m. Lydja Chandler Nov. 23,1634, and 2d, Mary Yates of Plymouth, Oct. 1651. Issue : Jona. 1637; Benj. 1640; Mary 1652; Eliakim Oct. 20,1654; Wm. Dec. 15, 1655; Judah March 5,1657 ; Zervia 1658; Thomas 1661; and Lydia 1664. Benjamin, b. 1640, m. Lydia Bangs, dr. Edward, Dec. 24,1661, and had Ichabod Nov. 14, 1662; Richard Oct 15,1664; John Nov. 20,1666; Josh. Oct. 1, 1668; Lydia 1A<70; Isaac Aug. 31, 1672; Benj. June 14, 1674, d inf.; Samuel Mar. 7, 167o-7; and Benj. Sept. 15, 1681. 4 Mr. Brown was s. of Wm., who m. Mary Murdock July 16, 1649, at372 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1692, pursuant to a warrant from Sir ¥m. Phips, the town chose representatives to the General Court to be held on the 8th of June in Boston. Mr. Samuel Smith Jr. died Sept. 22d.* In 1693, for the expenses of war, £13 11s. was appropriated, and £6 5s. for ammunition. This year we obtain another view of the Indians, and of Mr. Treat’s labors among them.2 Plymouth, and died here about 1694. Issue: Mary 1650; Geo. 1652 ; Wm. 1654; Samuel 1656 ; John; James; and Mercy. Sam’l, b. 1656, m. Martha Harding Feb. 19, 1682-3, and had Bethia 1684, d. inf.; Bethia 1685; Martha 1688; and Samuel Nov. 7, 1690. John had Sarah 1690; John 1692 ; Hannah 1694 ; Zebulon 1696 ; David 1699; and Mary 1701. Wm. m. Susanna Harding Oct. 27, 1699, and had Susanna 1700, and Jediah 1702. James, by w. Deborah, had Martha 1694; James 1696; Deborah 1699 ; Jediah 1701; and Thomas 1703. 1 Mr. S. was s. of Mr. Sam’l Smith Sr., who m. Mary Hopkins Jan. 3, 1664-5, and d. March 22, 1697, aged 55. He had Samuel May 26,1668; Mary 1669; Joseph April 10, 1671; John May 26, 1673 ; Grace 1676 ; and Rebecca 1678. Samuel, b. 1668, m. Bashua Lothrop, probably dr. of Barnabas, May 26, 1690, and had Samuel Feb. 13, 1690-1, and Joseph Oct. 9, 1692, posthumous. Thewid. mT*2d Samael Freeman. The origin of the name here is involved in some doubt. Mr. Savage supposes that Ralph Smith, from Hing. county of Norf. Eng. who came over 1633, and was in Hing. 1635, went to Eastham. It is certain that a Ralph Smith was early here, and wife Deborah 1654. There was also a John, and Mr. Savage supposes he was the “ Sr.” of Plymouth 1643. According to the E. rec. John m. Hannah Williams May 24, 1667, and had Elizabeth and Sarah. Again, John Sr. of E. lost his wife Lydia July 21, 1672, and m. Jael Packard of Bridg. Nov. 1672. A John m. Mary Eldridge Nov. 30, 1688, and had John, Jeremiah, William, and others. Thomas, who, Mr. Savage says, was, “perhaps, son of Ralph,” had by Mary, his wife, Ralph Oct. 23, 1682 ; Rebecca March 31, 1685 ; Thomas Jan. 29,1687-8; David 1691; Jona. July 5, 1693; Isaac June 3, 1695, d. aged 9, and Jesse June 31, 1703-4. Dan’l, who, Mr. Savage says, was perhaps s. of 1st John m. Mary Young, dr. John, March 3, 1676-7, and had Daniel Jan. 8, 1678-9; Content 1680; Abigail 1683; James 1685; Nathaniel 1687; and Mary 1693. John, “s. of John 3d,” says Mr. Savage, had, by his wife Sarah, a large family, the sons of which were Joseph 1697; William 1702; Seth 1706 ; and John 1713. John, son of Samuel 1st, b. 1673, m. Bethia Snow, dr. Stephen, May 14, 1694, and had James 1695 ; and Sam’l May 25,1696. Jeremiah m. Hannah Atwood Jan. 3, 1677, and had Jeremiah 1685 ; and 3 drs. Samuel m. Abigail Freeman Oct. 9, 1712, and had Mary 1713; Zoeth 1716; Abigail 1718; Martha 1721; Bashua 1723 ; Grace 1725; Su- sanna 1727 ; Samuel 1730; and Joseph 1741. * Mr. Treat writes to Rev. Increase Mather, “ I have from time to time imparted the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to these Indians in their own language, and, I truly hope, not without success. I continue in the same service, earnestly imploring a more plentiful outpouring of the Spirit upon them. . . . They have four distinct assemblies in as many villages belong- ing to our township; with four teachers of their own choice, who repair' once a week to my house to be themselves further instructed, pro modulo meo, in the concl mments proper for their service and station. . . . ThereANNALS OF EASTHAM. 373 In 1694, the incorporation of Harwich indicates the progress that had been made in the settlement of the territory lying between this town and Yarmouth. Mr. Stephen Atwood d. in the month of February,1 and Mr. Daniel Cole d. Dec. 21, aged 80.2 In 1695, Mr. Mark Snow d.3 The town voted to build a steeple upon its meeting-house, and to procure a are besides four schoolmasters, who teach their youth to read and write in their own language. They have six magistrates, and three stated courts.” The villages to which Mr. T. refers were u Potanumaquut, where Thomas Coshannag was the preacher and teacher; Meeshawn and Punonakanet, where Samuel Munsha was preacher; Monamoyick, with John Cosens for preacher; and Sakatucket, the preacher being Manasseth.” Mr. Treat translated and caused to be printed in the Nauset tongue, ‘ the Confession of Faith.’ That he might be an instrument of good to the Indians, he aimed to gain their affections, visited them often in their wigwams, asso- ciated with them in all kindness and affability, and joined in their festivals. In return, the natives regarded him as their friend, venerated him as their religious teacher; and loved him as their father. But he could not save them from wasting away l Here, as elsewhere, generally, from the mo- ment when brought into contiguity with the English, and especially after they had surrendered their lands, they wilted and died 1 1 Mr. Stephen Atwood m. Abigail Dunham, dr. of John, Nov. 6,1644, and had John ; Hannah Oct. 14, 1649 ; Eldad; and Medad. Eldad m. Anna Snow Feb. 14,1683, and had Mary 1684; John Aug. 10,1686; Anne 1688; Deborah 1690; Sarah 1692; Eldad July 9,1695; Ebenezer 1698; and Benj. 1701. Medad, by his w. Esther, had Mercy 1686 ; Abigail 1689; David, Oct. 20, 1691; Sam’l March 20, 1695 ; Esther 1699 ; Phebe 1702 ; and Nathan June 27, 1705. a There were several of the name of Cole who came over early. Isaac, of Sandwich, Eng., embarked on the Hercules 1634-5 with Joan, his wife, and 2 children. George came from Lynn to Sandwich 1637, but d. 1653; the inventory being made at the former place Mr. Savage supposes indicates that he had returned. Henry was liable to bear arms in Sandwich in 1643, and Mr. S. thinks went to Ct. Job was in Dux. early, and then in Y., and finally in E. He is said to have m. Rebecca Collier, dr. Wm., May 15, 1634, who d. a wid. Dec. 29,1698, aged 88; and to have had sons, Jno., Job, and Daniel, and his dr. Rebecca was b. here Aug. 26,1654. James Jr. is reported by the O. C. Rec. to have m. Mary Tilson Dec. 23,1652. Dan’l, said to be bro. of Job, came here from Y., and was town clerk 1652-5, deputy 1652 and afterwards 6 years. His w. Ruth died Dec. 15,1694, aged 67, perhaps a 2d w. His ch. were John July 15, 1744; Timothy Sept. 15, 1646 ; Hepzibah Ap. 15, 1651, who m. John Young; Israel June 8,1653; James Nov. 30, 1655 ; Mary March 10, 1658, who m. Joshua Hopkins May 26, 1681, and Wm. Sept. 15, 1663. 8 Mr. Mark Snow, b. 1628, was a man of large influence and usefulness; a deputy, also selectman, and clerk many years. He m. Anne Cook, dr. of Josiah, Jan. 18,1654-5, and 2d, Jane Prince, dr. of Gov. P., Jan. 9,1660-1. Issue: Anne 1656 ; Mary 1661; Nicholas Dec. 6, 1663 ; Elizabeth 1666, d. 1675; Thomas Aug. 6, 1668; Sarah 1671; Prince May 22, 1674; Elisa. 1676; and Hannah 1679.374 HISTOR* OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. bell.1 In order to make the rule more imperative that * every single man in the township shall kill 6 black- birds or 3 crows, each year,” it was now ordered that Aone “ such shall be married until they comply with the requisition” Mr. John Doane Jr. was app. “to procure the erection of a whipping-post and stocks for the town’s use.” The whole list of legal inhabitants, as reported this year,was as follows:— Henry Atkins Sr., Henry Atkins Jr., Joseph Atkins, Kath’l Atkins, Daniel Atwood, Eldad Atwood, Stephen Atwood Sr. Stephen Atwood Jr. Jtohn Bangs, Jon a. Bangs, Joshua Bangs, Thos. Bills, Geo. Brown, Sam’l Brown Sr., Sam’l Brown Jr., ffm. Brown, Josiah Cook, Josiah Cook Jr., Daniel Cole Sr., Daniel Cole Jr., Israel Cole, John Cole Sr., John Cole Jr., Samuel Cole, Thos. Cole, Tim. Cole, Joseph Collins,* Thos. Crosby, Daniel Doane, Eph’m Doane, Isaac Doane, Israel Doane, John Doane Sr., John Doane Jr., Joseph Doane, Const. Freeman, Edm. Freeman, Jno. Freeman Jr., FTath’l Freeman, Sam’l Freeman Jr., Steph. Freeman, Thos. Freeman, Win. Freeman, Joseph Harding, Josiah Harding, Meziah Harding, Benj. Higgins, Ich’d. Higgins, John Higgins, Jon a. Higgins Sr., Jona. Higgins Jr., Joseph Higgins, Josh. Hopkins Sr., Josh. Hopkins Jr., Steph. Hopkins, Sam’l Knowles, - Jona. Linnel, Daniel Mayo, James Mayo, John Mayo, Nat’l Mayo, Sam’l Mayo Sr., Sam’l Mayo Jr., Thos. Mayo, Jos. Merrick, Steph. Merrick, . 1 Mr. Pratt has said, “ this was the first meeting-house bell used upon the Cape, and the last in Eastham.” 2Mr. Collins was prob. s. of Henry, “starch-maker,” who em- barked June 17, 1635, ae. 29, with wife Anne, ae. 30, with the children, Viz.: Henry, Joseph, and Margery, ae. respectively 5, 3, and 2. They were from Ireland. The father settled in Lynn; was a member of the Salem Court 1639, and d. Feb. 20, 1687, ae. 81. Joseph of E. m. Duty Knowles Mar. 20, 1671-2, and had Sarah 1673 ; John Dec. 18, 1674, who m. Han- nah Doane, and had Solomon, Samuel, John, Joseph, and David; Lydia 1676 ; Joseph 1678, who m. Rebecca Sparrow; Hannah 1680; Jona. Aug. 20, 1682, who m. Elisa. Vickery; Ja e 1684; Benj. Feb. 6, 1687; and James Mar. 10, 1689, d. ii f.ANNALS 0E EASTRAVL 375 Thos. Merrick, Jno. Mulford Sr., Jno. Mulford Jr., Thos. Mulford,1 2 Elisha Paine, John Paine, Joseph Paine, Nicholas Paine, Sam’l Paine, Thos. Paine Sr., Thos. Paine Jr., Abraham Remick,* Joseph Rich,3 Jas. Rogers, Jeremiah Smith, Ralf Smith Sr., Ralf Smith Jr., Sam’l Smith Sr., Sam’l Smith Jr., Thos. Smith, Benj. Snow, Jabez Snow, John Snow, Joseph Snow Sr., Joseph Snow Jr., Mark Snow, Micaiah Snow, Nich’s Snow, Steph. Snow, Jno. Sparrow, Jona. Sparrow Sr., Jona. Sparrow Jr., Richard Sparrow, Mr. Sunderland, Mr. Treat, Win. Twining Sr.,, Wm. Twining Jr., Jabez Walker, Wm. Walker Sr.* Win. Walker Jr., Barn’s Waxam, Rob’t Waxam, Titus Waxam, Thos. Williams, Jno. Young, Joseph Young, Nathaniel Young, Robt. Young. The preceding, although a numerous list of inhabi- tants, does not embrace all who were men of adult years, nor yet all who were heads of families. Num- bers, long resident here, had not claimed the right of franchise; among whom we notice the names of Newcomb,4 Godfrey,5 Grey,6 Hurd,7 &c. 1 Mr. Thos. Mulford had by his wife Hannah, who d. a wid. Feb. 10, 1717-18, John 1670; Patience 1674; Anne 1677. He had also Thomas, who was prob. oldest of all. Thomas Jr. m. Mary Bassett Oct. 28, 1690, and had Anna 1691; Dorcas 1693; Mary 1695; Hannah 1698; Elizabeth 1701; Thos. Oct. 20, 1703; and Jemima 1706. 2 Mr. Abraham Remick, and his w. Elizabeth, had Christian Dec. 16, 1694; Abraham May 20, 1696; Mercy 1698; and Elizabeth 1700. Christian m. Hannah Freeman Oct. 10,1717, and had Mercy 1718; Hannah 1721; Elizabeth 1723; Christian April 8, 1726; Daniel July 11, 1729; Isaac Feb. 9, 1732-3; Joseph Mar. 21, 1738-9, d. inf.; Sarah 1742; and Joseph June 8, 1744. Christian, b. 1726, m. Sarah Freeman of H. Aug. 27, 1752. 8 Mr. Richard Rich Sr., mariner, came here from Dover N. H.; was admitted as a freeman Aug. 23, 1681; and d. 1692. Joseph was prob. his son; as was also Richard Jr., who by his w. Anne had Sarah 1696; Richard Feb. 28, 1698-9; Rebecca 1701; Zaccheus April 2, 1704; Obadiali July 15, 1707; Priscilla 1710, d. 1716; Huldah 1712; Joseph Oct. 5, 1715; and Sylvanus Sept. 4, 1720. 4 Mr. Thomas Newcomb m. Elizabeth Cook, dr. Josiah, Oct. 1693, and had Edward Aug. 3, 1695; Thos. Aug. 13, 1697; Simon Nov. 80, 1699. 6 Mr. Geo. Godfrey’s children ret orded as born here are Geo. Jan. 2, 1662; Samuel Jan. 27, 1664; Moses Jan. 27, 1667; Hannah 1669; Mary 1672; Ruth 1675; Richard June 11, 1677 ; Jonathan June 24, 1682; and Elizabeth 1688. 8 This name appears early in Yarmouth; but here is the record of the birth of Benoni Mar. 15, 1680-1, son of Edward. After this are families of the name in Harwich. 7 Mr. John IIurd, sometimes written Heard, was here from, it is said,376 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. In 1696, the town “ordered that hereafter when any common’s-lands are given or sold by vote of the town,” the act, to be valid, “ shall be subjected to the negative of men chosen for that purpose, and shall be laid out and bounded only on their approval.” This veto power given to “ the negative men ” was judged expedient to prevent the effects of hasty and incon- siderate acts by majorities possibly obtained through sinister effort. The Court of Quarterly Sessions hav- ing issued a precept requiring the selectmen to assess £19.5 toward defraying the expense of a bridge near Plymouth, this town, regarding the demand as both unjust and unlawful, — the bridge being twelve miles beyond the county line, — refused compliance, and instructed the selectmen to that effect; promising to indemnify them for any damage that might accrue from disregarding the order of Court. In 1767, purchases were made by inhabitants of this town, in anticipation of the settlement and growth of a plantation at Pamet. This end was prominently in view during several succeeding years. Mr. Samuel Smith d. Mar. 22, ae. 55. “ the Highlands of Scotland,” and his children born here were John Jan. 17, 1688-9 ; Grace Jan. 11, 1692-3; and Jacob April 12,1695. John, b. 1689, is reported in the H. Ree. as having by his w. Hannah, Sarah 1711; Rebecca 1713; Joseph Feb. 5, 1716-17; Deborah 1719; Benj. July 18, 1721; John Nov. 22, 1723; and Hannah 1730. Jacob, b. 1695, is also there on record as having by his w. Rebecca, Jacob Dec. 17, 1720; then removing to Connecticut, they had other children, and he d. aged, “ a man of large stature and great strength,” and “ his w. d., ae. 103.” Jacob, b. in H. 1720, is reported “ the second man who followed the coasting business on the Ct. River.” He d., as. 91, leaving numerous descendants. We have before us an able and interesting discourse preached on occasion of the decease of one of his nine children,—Mrs. Rebecca Bowers 1855, as. 100,— so interesting and well-written that we regret it must suffer at our hand, in its proemial part at least. The traditional data derived probably from the family, are inaccurate in their beginning; and, therefore, the exordium of the learned preacher, beautifully expressed, — describing the patriarch “ pil- grim from the land of John Knox and the Covenanters,”—is historically at fault. Both patriarch and son were b. on Cape Cod, and their progenitor was settled iu Eastham.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 377 In 1700, great inconvenience resulting from a scar- city of money, the town petitioned the General Court to abate the town’s taxes for general purposes; and the application, it seems, was not considered unreason- able: the prayer of the memorialists was granted. The town also asked to be relieved from the necessity of providing so many recruits for public service. It was voted to continue the town school, and to pay the teacher 10(7. per week for each pupil attending; also, that the North part of the town have a school-district “ if they will pay the teacher to learn their children to read the English Bible.”1 It was, moreover, ordered that the meeting-house be repaired and enlarged; £180 was appropriated for the purpose. The enlarge- ment, by fifteen feet, made it square and sufficiently commodious. In 1703, the population was 948. This and the fol- lowing year, a further division of lands was made by agreement of the proprietors. Mr. John Sunderland d. Dec. 26,1703, aged 85.2 * In 1705, Pamet, bordering on the lower part of this township, received a quasi incorporation. The name given in the act, however, was not euphonical, and a few years after was changed, the “ district” receiving full ine. as the Town of Truro. The following appears on the record this year, and is charac- teristic of the times: “ In town-meeting, voted that 4 Whereas there is much disorder and inconvenience in the town of East- 1 This, doubtless, had reference to the native Indians. *Mr. Sunderland and his wife Dorothy had John 1640; Mary 1642, whom. Jona. Rainsford; Hannah 1644; James 1647, d. inf.; James 1648; Benj. 1652. His w. d. Jan. 29, 1664, and he m. 2d, Thomasin, widow of Samuel Mayo and dr. of Wm. Lumpkin, and had Mercy 1665, and Sami 1668. Mr. Sunderland was much employed as a school-teacher, and was held in high respect. His will, Sept. 27, 1700, pr. Ap. 4, 1704, provides for his widow and her three daughters, Mary Bangs, Sarah Freeman, and Mercy Sears. VOL. II. 48m HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. ham, in not attending town-meetings; also by persons disorderly and tumultuously speaking in said meetings; also by disorderly departing without leave: It is, therefore, ordered that whenever there shall be a town-meeting duly warned, every person qualified to vote in said meeting and living within seven miles of the meeting-house, who shall not attend at the time appoint- ed, or by the time the meeting is ealled to order, or shall depart before the meeting closes without leave of the moderator ; or shall speak without liberty; shall be fined 6d. for every such de- fault.’ ” This proceeding was submitted, as law required, to the Ct. of Quar. Sessions at Barnstable for approbation, and was “ allowed.” The town gr. permission to Nicholas Paine “to build a wind- mill on the hill near his house.” A com., app. to settle the bounds between this town and the town of Harwich, reported that an agreement had been made with the town and proprietors of Harwich “that the jurisdiction of Eastham shall remain as formerly; but that all lands lying between the bounds of said towns1 shall forever be improved in common by the said two towns, — in consideration of which the town of Eastham shall annually pay to the proprietors of Harwich, £2 10s.” The French and Indian war was onerous, because of its exactions. In 1706, Mr. John Mayo died;2 also, Mr. Henry Young, April 26 ;3 and Mr. Thomas Paine.4 1 The lands thus intervening, it is understood, were those on which the Potanumaquut Indians resided, a moiety of which subsequently pertained to the domain of Eastham. 2 Mr. John Mayo was s. of Rev. John. He m. Hannah Reycroft, or Lecroft, Jan. 1, 1650-1, and had John Dec. 15, 1652; Wm. Oct. 7, 1654; James Oct. 3, 1656; Sami Aug. 2, 1658; Elisha Nov. 7, 1661, who d. 1701; Daniel June 24, 1664 ; Nath’l Ap. 2, 1667, and Thos. July 15,1672. 8 Mr. Young, b. 1672, s. of John 1st, by w. Sarah had Martha 1695; Elisa. 1698; Reliance 1700; Moses Nov. 15, 1702 ; and Thomas Oct. 24, 1705, who m. Rebecca Bangs. His elder bro. John m. Ruth Cole, dr Dan’l. Another brother, Joseph, m. Sarah Lewis, or Davis, and had Samuel 1680; Joseph and Isaac, gem., 1682; and James 1685. Another, Nath’l, m. Mercy Davis, who m. 2d, Nath’l Mayo 1708. Another, David, m. Anne Doane, dr. John, Jan. 20 1687-8, and had 8 drs. and sons; John March 20, 1695 ; David Sept. 25, 1701; and Henry March 23, 1711. Another, Rob- ert, m. Joanna Ilix March 22, 1694, and had Rob’t Dec. 11, 1696, and daughters. 4 See Yol. I 635; also, Annals of Harwich and Truro. Mr. Drake found by examination of the admiralty records, among those “ to be trans- planted to New England, Ap. 1637, were Thomas Paine of Wrentom, in SulTolcke, weaver, aged 50 ; Elizabeth, his wife, aged 53, and six children, viz., Thomas, John, Mary, Elizabeth, Dorothy, and Sarah.” Mr. SavageANNALS OP EASTHAM. 379 Mr. John Doane, a prominent and influential citizen, died March 15, 1708.1 In 1709, the town having been presented for not having a schoolmaster, John Doane Esq. was appoint- ed to appear in the town’s behalf and answer to the complaint; at the same time, the selectmen were in- structed to take especial care to obtain a teacher.2 Mr. Nathaniel Mato died Nov. 30.3 In 1710, lands were laid out “for the ministry, at Pochet and Billingsgate, — if any ministers be settled at those places; with 10 acres of woodland for each, to be for the benefit of the ministry in those places re- spectively forever.” The town voted at the same time, to “ add £20 to the salary of Mr. Treat,—making his entire salary equal to £70, silver money.” This seems to have , /een a period when the people were disposed to devise liberal things ; for, the year following, 4 acres of land was voted to each and every widow in town.4 Lt. Joshua Bangs died Jan. 14. In 1712, an agent was app. “ to meet the agent of the town of Harwich,” “ to determine and settle a line has it, “they came over 1637 in the Mary Ann of Yarmouth,” and that the father was “ son of Thomas and Catharine of Cooklie, near Halesworth, Co. of Suffolk,” and gives the issue of Thomas, who was b. Dec. 11,1586, and m. to his w. Elizabeth Nov. 22, 1610, as Mary October 12, 1611; Thomas Jan. 18,1613 ; Elisa. Jan. 20, 1615 ; Peter March 14,1617,d.inf.; Dorothy Dec. 6, 1618 ; John Aug. 26,1620 ; Sarah Mar. 7, 1622; and Na- thaniel July 21, 1626, d. inf. 1 Mr. Doane, s. of Dea. John, m. Hannah Bangs, dr. of Edward, April 30,1662, and had John 1663, d. inf.; John May 29,1664; Anna 1666; Re- becca 1668; Isaac June 2, 1670; and Samuel March 2, 1673. 2 The absence of the schoolmaster was evidently not the result of indif- ference to the importance of common schools. It was often difficult to ob- tain a suitable teacher. Probably, however, had the compensation been as liberal as in later times, the number of those giving themselves to the occu- pation would have been adequately increased. * Mr. Nathaniel Mayo b. 1652, was s. of Nath’l. He m. Elisa. Wixam June 28, 1678, and 2d, Mercy Youug, wid. of Nath’l, June 10, 1708. He had Nathaniel 1681; Bathsheba 1683; Alice 1686; Ebenezer 1689; Hannah 16 92; Elisha 1695; and Rob’t 1698. 4 A state of widowhood is that into which large numbers in these maritime towns have been early introduced by the dangers of the seas.380 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. between the two towns, running through the tract of land formerly reserved for the Indians.” Dea. Sam’l Freeman d. Jan. 30;1 Mr. Joseph Paine d. Oct. 6; and Mr. Samuel Paine d. Oct. 13. In 1713, notwithstand- ing the diminished resources of the country by reason of protracted war, this town provided for repairs of the meeting-house; also divided the town into two school districts, the Cove to be the dividing line ; and engaged Mr. Peter Barnes as teacher.2 The next year, 1714, Mr. Nehemiah Hobart was en- gaged as teacher; * and, in addition to his salary as schoolmaster, the town engaged to pay him £10 “ to assist Rev. Mr. Treat, —preaching as occasion may re- quire, the pastor being much disabled by sickness.” The Indians living on the lands until recently known as ‘ the reservation,’ between the bounds of Harwich and Eastham, entered a complaint against the town for trespass; and an order of notice being served upon the selectmen, Mr. John Paine was app. to appear at Court in the town’s behalf and answer to the action. In 1715, regulations were made to prevent cattle and horses running at large upon the town’s commons. 1 M^ Samuel Freeman was in Watertown 1630. His house was burned 1631, and returning to England on business he died there, soon after the birth of his son, the above Samuel, May 11, 1638. He owned one-sixth part of the township of Watertown. Tradition, very uncer- tain, tells that he was the eldest of 11 sons, and Edmund of Sandwich is supposed to have been one of them. Henry of Watertown, is represented ass eldest s. of Samuel, inheriting the paternal estate. He m. Hannah Stearns Dec. 25, 1650, who was buried June 17, 1656, and 2d, Mary Shearman Nov. 27, 16561 He d. Nov. 12, 1672, and his s. James, whose w. Rachel m. 2d, Rd. Shute, had one only g. Samuel, who d. 1728 unmarried. Dea. Sam’l, b. 1638, removed to Eastham. He m. Mary Southwortli, dr. of Con- stant, May 12, 1658. Issue : Apphia Dec. 11, 1659, d. inf.; Samuel Mar. 26, 1662; Apphia Jan. 1, 1666, who m. Isaac Pepper Oct. 7, 1685; Con- stant March 31, 1669; Elisa. June 26, 1671, who m. Remick, and 2d, Mer- rick ; and perhaps others. 2 Mr. Barnes grad. H. C. 1712. 8 Mr. Hobar, grad. H. C. 1714, and is prob. the same set. in the ministry at Cohasset 1 '21.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 381 Del ., Thomas Freeman d. Feb. 9,1716;1 Mr. Nathaniel Mayo also d. this year.2 In 1717, the Rev. Samuel Treat died greatly lament- ed, after an active ministry of forty-five years.3 An en- gagement was, thereupon, made with Mr. Hobart to perform religious services until a minister could be provided, and Joseph Doane Esq. was sent abroad to procure a candidate. Mr. Lord was obtained, but preached only a few Sundays; he afterwards settled at Chatham. Of the ability, piety, and faithfulness of the late pastor, his contemporaries and parishioners bear hon- orable testimony. Tradition represents him as “cheer- ful in manners, pleasant in conversation, — sometimes 1 Dea. Thomas Freeman, b. 1653, s. of Dea. John, the Assistant. See Yol. I. 602. 2 Mr. Mayo, b. 1667, was s. of John, and g. s. of Rev. John. He had sons Wm. and Rob’t, and 8 drs. 8 Mr. Treat had a remarkably vigorous constitution, and his health was firm until near the close of life, when attacked by palsy. A second attack terminated his earthly existence, to the great grief of all who knew him. His decease occurred at the time of a remarkable storm distinguished in the annals of New England as “the great snow.” The winds blew with violence, so that although the grounds immediately around his house were swept entirely bare, drifts were heaped in the road to a great height. As it was impossible to make a pathway to the grave, the burial was neces- sarily deferred some days until an arch could be dug through some of the more prominent drifts. The Indians were, at their urgent request, permit- ted to take their turn with the white people, as a token of respect for their beloved teacher and friend, in bearing his body to its long rest. Upon his tombstone is this inscription: “ Here lies the body of the late learned and reverend Samuel Treat, the pious and faithful pastor of this church, who, after a very zealous discharge of his ministry for the space of forty-five years, and laborious travail for the souls of the Indian natives, fell asleep in Christ, Mar. 18, 1716-17, in the sixty-ninth year of his age.” Mr. Treat grad, at Harvard College 1669. See Yol. I. 350 In addition to what is there said, it may be remarked that his children were: Jane, b. Dec. 6, 1675; Elisa. July 24, 1676; Sarah June 20, 1678; Samuel July 1680; Mary Mar. 16, 1682; Robt. Feb. 24,1683-4; Abigail June 13, 1686; Joseph Nov. 19, 1690; Joshua Mar. 17, 1692; John May 17, 1693; Nathl April 15, 1694; Eunice Sept. 27, 1704; and Robert Jan. 21, 1707. The mother of all except the last two was Elizabeth, dr. of Mr. Samuel Mayo (not Rev. John, as before inadvertently stated), and grand dr. of Rev. John m. Mar. 16, 1674, and died Dec. *, 1696, ae. 44. To the mother of his last children, Abigail (Willard) Easterbrook, widow of Benjamin, he was m. Aug. 29, 1700. She survived until Dec. 27, 1746.382 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. facetious, always dignified though fond of humor, and often shaking his sides with laughter.” The venerable and learned minister of the Stone Chapel in Boston, long since deceased (Rev. Jas. Freeman, D.D.), whose ancestry resided in the vicinity of Mr. Treat’s labors, has said, “ His sermons and manuscripts exhibit learn- ing; the doctrines are defended with ability and ingenuity; and the applications of the sermons are tremendous.” It has been said, however, that he was not a popular orator.1 Mr. Ed.mund Fbeeman died this year.2 In 1718, the town appropriated £600 for the erec- tion of a new meeting-house, and extended a call to 1 Dr. Freeman has said, “ His voice was so loud that it could be heard at a great distance from the meeting-house where he was preaching, even in the midst of the winds that howl over the plains of Nauset.” He says, moreover, of that powerful voice, “ There was no more music* in it than in the discordant sounds with which it mingled.” Such, it will be understood, were Dr. F.’s impressions from the relation of others; he could not have been an ear-witness. That Mr. Treat was not distinguished for captivating oratorical powers may be fairly inferred from an instructive and somewhat amusing anecdote related of his preaching lor his father-in-law, minister of the Old South Church in Boston, and sometime president of Harvard College. Dr. Willard, as is well known, possessed superior powers of mind; his imagina- tion rich without luxuriance, his perception rapid and correct, his argument- ative efforts profound and clear. Mr. Treat, being invited to preach for him, gave one of his best sermons, — without doubt; but the congregation did not receive it with favor. Some, not knowing that the preacher was their pastor’s son-in-law, even hinted to Mr. Willard a hope that he would not again invite his services; they doubted not that the minister was a pious and very worthy man, but — “ such horrid preaching! ” Mr. Willard listened attentively, and borrowed the sermon, which, a few weeks after, he delivered from the same pulpit, verbatim. The audience were i charmed! their min- ister had excelled himself; he had never before preached so excellent a sermon! ’ They even requested a copy for the press. Said one, w You preached from the same text that stranger had; but what a difference! ” When told it was the identical discourse preached by “ the stranger ”— “ my son-in-law, Mr. Treat,” the effect of the announcement can be better imag- ined than described. It has been suggested, he might with great propriety have addressed the sapient critics, in the words of Phaedrus, — “ En hie declarat, quales sitis judices.” *Mr. Freeman, called Lieut., b. 1657, s. of Maj. John, m. probably Sarah Sunderland. He had, by Sarah, Isaac, Ebenezer, Edmund, Ruth, Sarah, Mary, Experience, Mercy, \Sankful, Elizabeth, Hannah, and Rachel.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 383 Mr. Samuel Osborn.1 Joseph Doane Esq., Capt. Sam’l Freeman, John Knowles, and Nathaniel Freeman Esq. were appointed a committee to treat with him; his acceptance of the pastoral office was reported, and arrangements were made for his institution, which took place Sept. 18. In ;he mean time, however, a tempo- rary difficulty had arisen ; the location of the old meeting-house, at the ancient burial-place, was incon- venient for a large portion of the present population. Many attempts to fix on a location more central, and harmonizing the views of all, proved unsuccessful. A proposition was finally made to build iivo meeting- houses,— one in the south, the other in the north part of the town, and then divide the town into corre- sponding parishes. This met with general approbation. Further, it was nobly resolved that, “ if the people can- not lovingly agree on the line dividing the two distinct parishes to be formed, the town will invite discreet men from neighboring towns to settle the question, and Mr. Osbum, concurring, shall make his election of the parish he will serve.” The duty of determining the dividing line was committed to Messrs. Joseph Lothrop and John Baker, of Barnstable, and Elisha Hall of Yarmouth, whose decision settled the contro- versy. Rev. Mr. Osborn removed to the South Parish, and entered upon the charge of the branch of the church now, by amicable agreement, duly organized. Richard Knowles was paid from the town treasury <£2.10 “ for bringing Mr. Osborn’s family and goods from Plymouth.” The next year, “ a burial-place was laid out at the west end of the South meeting-house.” Mr. Simon Crosby died this year Jan. 19, aged 52; and 1 Mr. Osborn was from Ireland, and educated at the University of Dublin.384 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. Mr. Stephen Hopkins, Oct 10.1 Of the wreck of the Whidah, we have spoken, p. 356 of our former volume.8 In 1719, the town being fined £50 for not having a school, a petition to the Court of Sessions asked either the remission of the fine, or that it be disposed of for the benefit of schools in this town. The inhab- itants of Billingsgate asked “ to be set off from East- ham, — to constitute a distinct township extending from the bounds of Truro to Indian Brook and thence easterly to the sea. To this the town objected. See Yol. I. 357. Dea. John Freeman died.3 Until 1720, the old meeting-house was occupied by the North Parish; the new one being now finished, 1 Mr. Hopkins, b. 1642, s. of Giles, and grand s. of Stephen the Pilgrim, is mentioned in his grandfather's will when yet an infant. See Annals of Harwich. 2 This noted piratical craft, wrecked April 26, had succeeded in captur- ing several vessels, one of which with a prize-crew on board, was soon after anchored safely in Cape Cod Harbor by her rightful captain. The pirates becoming intoxicated, he seized the opportunity and regained his ship. Several of the prize-crew, when aroused from their drunken sleep, contrived to escape; but they were finally arrested and taken to Boston. Six were executed. The pirate ship itself, singularly enough, was, soon after the loss of its prize, overtaken by a violent storm, and dashed to pieces near the table- land of what is now Wellfleet. All but two of the crew are supposed to have perished. Capt. Southack, sent by Government to the scene of disas- ter, found and buried the bodies of 102. As late as 1814, parts of the ship were yet to be seen, in the stillness and consequent clearness of the waters, reposing in the whiteness of the sandy bottom, and coin made in the reign of William & Mary had been found from time to time on the beach. We are assured that, by the action of the sea, the wreck is now, 1863, again disclosed. Mr. Pratt relates a traditional story of a man of peculiar aspect, who, often visiting this part of the Cape, was supposed to have been one of the pirates. The presumption was strong on the minds of many that he was, at least, cognizant of some place where treasures were secreted, and that he came hither for supplies as his exigencies required. Aged people related of him, that, oft-times, in the stillness of night, his sleep was attended by boisterous, profane, and quarrelsome outbreaks, as if he were contending with legions. When allowed the hospitality of a private dwell- ing, if the Scriptures were to be read and prayer offered, he was greatly disturbed and hastily retired. It was said, moreover, that, upon his body, after death, was found a girdle, in which was concealed much gold. 8 Mr. Freeman had held a prominent place, not only in the town, but in the colony. See Yol. I. 601. His will was offered for probate Nov. 4, 1719. He was the patriarch of a numerous family, and survived several of his sons who also had large families. His widow d. Sept. 27, 1721.ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 385 the former was abandoned. A burial-place was laid out, adjoining the new place for worship, and a house was erected for a parsonage. As an effort to concil- iate the people of Billingsgate, a resolution was offered in town-meeting to allow that part of the town to be a distinct parish, — the ministers of the three parishes to be paid from a common fund. The resolution was negatived. The North Precinct having taken measures to pro- vide a minister, through their agent, Mr. Isaac Pepper; and Mr. Benjamin Webb being invited to accept the pastoral charge, the town unanimously voted him a salary of £90, — the same paid to Mr. Osborn, with the use of ministerial lands and meadows. They also gave him in fee simple the parsonage house. He accepted and was ordained.1 In 1721, many meetings were held in reference to the town’s portion of the £50,000 loan. Mr. Isaac Pepper was appointed to receive it from the Province Treasurer; and Joseph Doane Esq., Capt. Samuel Freeman, and Nathaniel Freeman Esq. were appointed trustees of the fund with directions to “let out the same, £468.10 at five per cent, and no more, — taking good security of real or personal estate.” Mr. John Freeman, son of Dea. John, died July 27, se. 70.® ? ; S/ In 1722, the town was served with order of notice, and appointed Mr. John Paine to appear and oppose the petition of the inhabitants of Billingsgate; the result was that, the next year, a committee from the Court visited the town, heard the parties, and reported 1Rev. Mr. Webb was from Braintree, b. 1695, and grad. H. C. 1715. aMr. John Freeman, b. 1651, m. Sarah Merrick, dr. of Wm., Dec. 18, 1672, and 2d, Mercy Watson, wid. of Elkanah of Plym. He had John Sept. 3, 1674, d. inf.; Sarah 1676, who m. Edw. Snow; John 1678, who m. Mercy.Watson, dr. of Elkanah ; Rebecca 1681; Nath’l Mar. 17,1682-3, who m. Mary Watson, dr. of Elkanah; Benj. 1685, who m. Temp’e Dim- mick; Morey, 1687, who m. Chilingsworth Foster; Patience, who m. Ele- azer Crosby; Susanna, who m. John Mayo Jr.; Elisa., who m. John Bacon ; and Mary, who a. Judah Berry. YOL. II. 49386 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. in favor of the petitioners. Lt. Joseph Snow died Jan. 3, 1722-3.1 In 1723, Billingsgate became the 3d Parish in East- ham. Until this time, one general ministerial tax had been assessed by the town. The new parish was organized, July 29, as the North Precinct. A meeting- house at Chequessett Neck,—owned by proprietors,— small, being only twenty feet square, but sufficiently large for the present, had been erected; and Mr. Josiah Oakes, who had been officiating here several years, was now requested to “ continue in the ministry with us as formerly.” He “accepted the call,” and the precinct voted to pay him a salary of <£80.2 The town ceasing from this time to act in ecclesias- tical matters in its former united capacity, we must distinguish between town and parish affairs. Mr. Oakes, we have seen, accepted the call of the newly- organized North Precinct; but, whether there was a misunderstanding in regard to the nature of the call or for other reasons, we soon find him and his people in trouble. At the very first precinct-meeting after his acceptance, no less than twenty-six voters entered their “ protest against his settlement and against any *Lt. Joseph Snow had sons: Joseph, Benj., Stephen, James, and Josiah, and 6 drs. Stephen m. Susanna Rogers, wid. of Joseph Jr., Oct. 8, 1663, and had Micaijah Dec. 22, 1669; and 3 drs. John m. Mary Small Sept. 19, 1667, and had John May 3, 1678; Isaac Aug. 10, 1683 ; Elisha Jan. 10, 1686-7; and 6 drs. Thomas, s. of Mark, m. Hannah Sears, dr. Silas, Feb. 8, 1692 ; and 2d, wid. Lydia Hamblin Sept. 30, 1706 ; and had Elisa. 1693; Mary 1696; Josiah Jan. 27, 1699; Eben. Feb. 14, 1700, who was the first child baptized in the church at Harwich, Mar. 30, 1701; Hannah 1703; Lydia 1707 ; Thomas June 15, 1709; Aaron Feb. 15, 1710-11; and Ruth 1713. 8 Mr. Oakes was from Boston, and grad. H. C. 1708. He had, evi- dently, been here some years. His father, Doct. Thomas, of Bostun, s. of Edward, of Cambridge, who had occupied high positions in political life, came here, perhaps, in 1707, and d. here July 15, 1719. He had two sons, James Oct. 30, 1687 ; and the above Josiah May 3,1689. It maybe, how- ever, that Dr. O. did not permanently remove until after the decease of hi3 wife, which occurred in Boston Ap. 19, 1719, at the age of 70.ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 387 assessment to pay him.”1 Nevertheless, Mr. Oakes continued his ministry in the precinct. The next year, the situation of the parish was before the Gen- eral Court. See Yol. I. 362-3. The following year, the precinct voted, by a large majority, to reconsider all former doings in regard to call, salary, settlement, and appointed George Williamson and Elisha Eldridge Jr. a committee “ to forbid his preaching any more in the meeting-house,” and Samuel Brown and Samuel Smith a committee “ to advise with neighboring minis- ters in regard to present circumstances, and procure a suitable minister for the parish.” Mr. Oakes, however, made complaint to the Court of Sessions and asked for redress, in which request he was joined by John Doane and fifteen others. He continued to minister to a minority; and, for some time, notwithstanding the decision of Courts and frequent attempts of com- mittees to heal the breach or induce him to leave town, difficulties seemed to augment. Finally, Mr. Oakes retired, and the precinct had the services of another.2 Mr. John Cole d. Jan. 6, 1724-5;3 and Mr. Jonathan Linnel July 27, 1725. In 1727, the General Court having authorized another issue 1 Possibly invited only “ to continue in the ministry as formerly,” the acceptance may have been couched in terms that seemed to the parishion- ers to imply more than they had intended: the reply was, u I accept of both your former and your latter call, together with your former and latter proposals; and, accordingly, shall continue in the work of the ministry ii* order to a settlement among you.” 2 Mr. John Sumner; but no movement was made for his settlement. 3 Mr. John Cole, b. 1644, m. Ruth Snow Dec 12, 1666, and had Ruth 1668; John Mar. 6, 1669-70; Hejteibah 1672, Hannah 1675 ; Joseph June 11, 1677 ; Mary 1679; and Sarah 1682. Israel, b. 1653, m. Mary Rogers Ap. 24, 1679, and had Hannah 1681; and Israel June 28, 1685. William, b. 1663, m. Hannah Snow Dec. 2, 1688, and had Elisha Jan. 26, 1688-9; David Oct. 4, 1691; Hannah 1693; and Jane 1696. John, b. 1670, had, by his w. Mary, Jona. Oct. 4, 1694: John, Oct. 14, 1696; Mary 1698; James Oct. 23, 1700; Nathan Jan. 21, 1702-3; Joshua Mar. 20, 1704-5; Moses July 22, 1707; Phebe 1709; Thankful 1712, d. inf.; Joseph Oct. 13, 1714; and Thankful 1716. He d. Dec. 13, 1746; she d.388 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. of Bills of Credit, to the amount of £60,000, this town voted not to receive any part of it. Subsequently, however, the vote was reconsidered, and Nath’l Freeman Esq., Edward Knowles, and John Paine were constituted a committee to receive the town’s portion, £587.15, and let it out as provided by law. In 1728, a meeting of the North Precinct was held to see if the parish will consent to build a new meet- ing-house, or make arrangements with the proprietors of the building now in use ; and it was finally agreed between the parties that the parish repair the present house, put in glass windows,1 and keep the building in repair four years; after which time the parish shall, if thought expedient, take away the glass and all other fixtures placed there at its own expense; the building then to revert to the proprietors. Several at- tempts were made to obtain a minister, £200 being voted for ministerial support and incidental charges. A call was proffered to Mr. David Hall, but declined.2 A com. was then appointed to confer with the Presi- dent of Ilarv. College and others to secure the servi- ces of a suitable clergyman, and an invitation was ex- tended to Mr. Ezra Whitmarsh,3 with the offer of £90 salary and a settlement of £120, together with the use of the ministerial lands and a gift of four acres ; but although Mr. W. was inclined to accept, no satisfac- tory agreement was made, and in 1729 he discontinued his services. Mr. Ichabod Higgins d. June 1, aged 30;4 1 The presumption is that, until now, wooden shutters only had adorned the house. 2 Mr. Hall grad. Harv. Coll. 1724. 8 Mr. Whitmarsh grad. H. C. 1723. * Mr. Ichabod Higgins, b. 1662, s. of Benjamin, and g. s. of Richard, had, by his w. Melatiah, John June 8, 1692; Nathaniel June 1, 1694; Thankful 1696; Lydia 1698; and Ebenezer Ap. 15, 1701. Jonathan, prob. a s. of Rich’d, b. 1637, m. Elisa. Rogers Jan. 9, 1660-1, and had Be- riah Sept. 27, 1661; Jona. Feb. 14,1664; Joseph Feb. 14,1667; and prob. James and others. Benj. b. 1674, s. of Benj., m. Sarah, dr. of Edm. Free- man, May 22,1701, and had sons Thomas, Paul, Benj., Zacckeus, Solomon, Isaac, and Freeman, and 7 dr* Richard, b. 1664, s. of Benj., had, by w.ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 389 and Capt. Jonathan Bangs d. Nov. 9, ae. 78. Mr. Jebb- muh Smith d. March 29, the previous year; and Mr. Thomas Mayo d. Ap. 22, 1729, aged 79.1 In 1730, another effort of the North Precinct to ob- tain a pastor was more successful. The services of Rev. Isaiah Lewis being obtained, his ministry proved highly acceptable. A call was extended to him with the offer of £110 per annum “ in good and passable money, and whatever strangers being providentially in the place shall contribute,”2 also £200 “ good money,” as a settlement, together with the use of the lands and meadows belonging to the parish. Mr. Lewis accepted, and a church was organized within the precinct by the council assembled to ordain him, and Elisha Doane was, at the same time, elected dear con. The church embraced about 50 male members, besides females. Mr. Sam’l Snow died July 26. In 1731, Dea. Thos. Crosby died April 21, aged 68; and Mr. John Paine, Oct. 18, aged 70. Mr. Josiah Cook died in 1732, Jan. 31 ;3 and Mr. James Maker d. July 8. In 1733, the “Eastham grantees of Narraganset Township No. Sarah, Joshua Dec. 3, 1695; Eleazer Feb. 9, 1696-7; Theoph. May 6, 1698; Jediah 1700; Zaccheus 1701; Esther 1704; David 1706; Reuben 1709; Moses 1711 ; and Abigail 1715. 1 Mr. Thomas Mayo, s. of Nathaniel 1st, b. 1650, m. Barbara Knowles, dr. Richard, June 13, 1677, and had Thomas Ap. 3, 1678; Theoph. Oct. 31, 1680; Mary 1683; Maria 1685; Ruth 1688; Judah Nov. 25, 1691; Lydia 1694; Richard Jan. 13, 1696; and Israel Aug. 12,1700. His bro. Sam’l, who d. 1738, was twice m. and had Samuel 1690; Jonathan; Rebecca; and Mercy. 2 Certain portions of the Cape were, in early times, the resort, at certain seasons, of not only fishermen from abroad, who came because of the pe- culiar facilities here afforded for prosecuting their business, but of traders having fishermen in their employ, or being desirous of securing shipments. The entire method of conducting the business has changed, as have also lo- calities where fish are sought. 8 Mr. Josiah Cook, s. of Josias, m. Deborah Hopkins July 27, 1668, and had Elisa. Oct. 12,1669, d. inf.; Josiah Nov. 12,1670; Rich’d Sept. 1, 1672; Elisa. 1674; Caleb Nov. 15, 1676 ; Deborah 1678 ; Joshua Feb. 4, 1682-3 and Benj. Feb. 28, 1686.390 HISTORt OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. 7,” are described June 6, on the records of the town of Gorbam, as follows: “ Timothy Cole, Jeremiah Smith, Jonathan Grew, Thomas Paine, Jed. Higgins, Eliakim Higgins, Joseph Downing, Benjamin Downing, John Walker, John Myrick, Nathaniel Wil- liams, John Freeman, Jonathan Sparrow, John Knowles, Samuel Berry, Sam’l Atkins, John Doane, Thomas Mulford, Josiah Cook, Joseph Harding, and George Brown.” The grant was for “sol- dier-service ” in 1675. But few, we apprehend, now remained to enjoy the bounty. In 1734, the North Precinct resolved to build a meeting-house, and to place it S. of Duck Creek. For this purpose <£200 was appropriated; and the town was asked for consent to the precinct being made a distinct township. The application was not successful. Agents were appointed by the town to meet such per- sons as may be appointed by the towns of Harwich, Chatham, Truro, and Provincetown, “ to memorialize the Gen. Court, asking that these five towns may be erected a County distinct and separate from the county of Barnstable.” Agents from five towns assembled at the house of Capt. Simeon Knowles, Nov. 20, prepared a memorial, and delegated William Paine, John Rich, and John Knowles to present the same and urge the prayer of the petitioners. The application being re- fused, an effort was next made to have the number of courts held in the county diminished. This also was unsuccessful. The feeling that cried for change was not to be subdued by slight rebuffs; the subject was still agitated with much zeal; and in 1737 a vigorous attempt was made to obtain “ a law requiring two terms of the Courts of Common Pleas and . Gen. Ses- sions for the county, to be held annually in the town of Eastham.” The “ great distance ” from the shire town, the “ expense ” of attending courts • so remote, the “loss of time” to jurors and others, were, of course, the prominent reasons set forth why theANNALS OF EASTHAM. 391 change should be made. Capt. Jonathan Bangs Jr. d. in February; and Joseph Merrick Sr. died June 15, aged 75.1 In 1738, the pastoral relation between Rev. Mr. Os- born and the Sooth Precinct was dissolved;2 and the parish had, for some time, the services of Mr. Roland Thacher.3 Difficulties had existed between the former minister and a part of the church, growing, probably, out of differences'of opinion in regard to doctrines. The disaffected alleged that his religious sentiments were lax and his teachings erroneous. An eccle- siastical council of ten ministers and messengers, from as many churches, had convened, June 27, upon letters missive from Joseph Doane, Nathaniel Freeman, and others in behalf of the majority, and Mr. Osborn was suspended from the work of the ministry four months. Whether he regarded the action of the council as equivalent to a dissolution of the pastoral relation is hardly questionable ; for, from his persisting in the oc- cupancy of the ministerial lands, it must be inferred that he did not consider himself as regularly dismissed. Mr. Osborn has been represented as “a man of wisdom and virtue, possessing many good qualities.” He had the reputation of introducing the use of peat for fuel, and various improvements in husbandry.4 In 1739, Mr. Joseph Crocker was unanimously called to the pastorate of the Sooth Precinct, and was or- 1 Mr. Joseph Merrick, b. 1662, m. Elisa. Howes May 8,1684, and had Elisa. Jan. 1685 ; Mary July 7, 1687 ; Joseph March 8, 1689-90 ; William Jan. 26, 1692-3; and Isaac Aug. 12, 1697. The name is now often, per- haps generally, Myrick. 2 Mr. Osborne finally removed to Boston, where he kept a grammar school many years, and died at a great age. 3 He grad. H. C. 1733. 4 It is the suggestion of later times, that the gist of all the trouble with Mr, Osborn was that he leaned to the views of Arminius, the church retain- ing the faith of Calvin.392 HISTORY OP BARNSTABLE COUNTY. dained Scpl 12.1 To this time, the expense of sup- porting the ministry had been shared jointly by the two precincts, South and Central, and it was now agreed that the same fraternal arrangement shall con- tinue, — an account to be kept by the treasurer dis- tinct for each, that if hereafter either parish desire a different arrangement, there may be an equitable di- vision of common property. Mr. Crocker was to have the same settlement and salary as given his predeces- sor ; in addition to which was sufficiency of wood for yearly use delivered at his door. The precincts also engaged “ to sustain Mr. Crocker in ejecting Mr. Osborn.” The town petitioned the Court for abatement of the town’s provincial tax; also for an act favoring the preservation of Bil- lingsgate beach and commons meadow. In 1740, we obtain a view of the North Precinct meeting-house; it had hitherto remained both un- lathed and un-plastered. It was now resolved to finish and underpin the building, and pave around it. For lathing, plastering, etc., £63 was raised. The precinct engaged to cause to be delivered at Mr. Lewis’s door 16 cords of wood; also to lay out more meadow for his use, and plough for him two acres of land. The next year an addition of £8 was made to his salary. Two years after, 1743, a further addition of £32, old tenor, was made ; and, two years after this, 1745, “ two spots for pews ” were sold “ to repair the glass of the meeting-house.” The town, this year, made “ division of all the remaining undivided lands, from Sluts Bush to Boat-meadow River, to 137 male inhabitants, now of age.” Mr. Sam'l Freeman d. Jan. 30, 1743, aged 82. la 1746, the town applied “for protection from 1 Mr. Crocker was from Barnstable, and grad. H. C. 1734.ANNALS OF EASTHAM. 393 impressment in His Majesty’s service.” The Rev. Benjamin Webb, pastor of the Central Precinct, died Aug. 21, ae. 51, after a ministry of 26 years, greatly lamented. He is commended by contemporaries as having been “ a pious, learned, laborious, faithful min- ister, whose daily walk was holy and unblamable, and whose prominent traits were gentleness and humility.”1 Capt. Edward Bangs d. May 22, as. 81. After Mr. Webb’s decease, Mr. Josiah Torry2 3 and Mr. Ezra Carpenter 3 were each, successively, invited to the pastoral charge, but declined. Rev. Edward Cheever was then called, and, accepting, was installed in 1751.4 The population of the entire township was now about 2,000. Mr. James Rogers d. Sept. 8. In 1753, Samoel Knowles Esq. died.5 6 Excepting measures “ to prevent the destruction of the western shore,” and the adjustment of bounds on 1 Rev. Mr. Crocker of the South Precinct has said of Mr. Webb, “ He was the best man and the best minister I ever knew; his heart was pure as the falling snow, and his mind serene as a mild June evening sky when the full moon shines without a cloud.” Mr. Webb was one of the several min- isters in the county who felt constrained to unite in a declaration against the movements of the Rev. Geo. Whitefield, which “ testimony ” was pub- lished in 1745, and asserts “Itinerant preaching tends to destroy the usefulness of ministers among their people, promotes strife and contention, a censorious and uncharitable spirit, and schisms that destroy peace and unity and threaten the subversion of many churches.” It should be men- tioned to the honor of his parish, that, after his decease, they voted “£30, old tenor, to his widow, with a supply of firewood for one year.” Mr. W/s w. was Mehitable Williams of Taunton. * Grad. II. C. 1741. 3 Grad. H. C. 1720. 4 Mr. Cheever, b. 1706, grad. H. C. 1737, was from Ipswich, and had been previously settled. 6 Mr. Richard Knowles, who was early at Plym., was here 1653. His children were Mercy, who m. Ephraim Doane Feb. 5, 1668 ; John; Sami Sept. 17, 1651, at Plym.; Mehit. May 20, 1653, at E., d. inf.; Mehit. 1655 ; Barbara 1656. John m. ApphiaBangs, dr. Edward, Dec. 28,1670, who m. 2d, Joseph Atwood. Issue: Edward Nov. 7, 1671; John July 10, 1673; and Deborah 1675. Samuel m. Mercy Freeman, grand dr. of Gov. Prince 1679, and had James 1680; Mercy 1681; Samuel 1682; Nath’l 1686; Richard 1688; Rebecca 1690; John 1692; Ruth 1694; Cornelius 1695 ; and Amos 1702. John, b. 1673, by w. Mary, had Joshua 1696; John 698; Seth 1700; Paul 1702; James 1704; Jesse 1707; and Mary 1709. vol. h. 50394 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. either sid i of the township, this period is nearly bar- ren of interest. In 1754, the representative elected by the town in conformity with law was instructed by a vote of the town “ to stay at home ” to save expense, “ the town engaging to hold him harmless; ” — a penny-wise and pound-foolish expedient; for, soon after, the town found occasion to petition the General Court, “to be released from the liabilities incurred ” by that transaction. In 1755, difficulties that had long been culminating in the North Precinct, growing out of a depreciated currency that rendered the minister’s support quite precarious, were finally set- tled ; it being agreed that “ his salary shall,' in future, be £50 sterling,” and that he shall receive “£8, sterling,” on account of former losses.” Mr. Samuel Doane d. Aug. 19, 1756. In 1757, the town directed the payment of £420, old tenor, to fourteen men “ who have been serving in the army during the war; ” also “ that they be excused from paying a poll tax.” It was also voted to prosecute certain inhabitants of Harwich, “ for carrying-on the whale-fishery at Billingsgate.” In 1758, an inhabitant of the North Precinct having avowed himself conscientiously a Baptist, the parish voted to remit his tax for the support of the ministry and meeting-house repairs. It is pleasant to record this instance of justice and toleration, and to feel assured, as we do, that Cape Cod was at no time greatly sinning against either Baptists or Quakers. In 1759, the burial-place of the North Precinct was fenced; and “Tate & Brady’s version of the Psalms” began to be used in public worship. The next year, provision was made “ for the support of the poor of the town; ” and £160, lawful money, was raised for schools. The year following, the North Precinct engaged a teacher for its public free school, at a salary of £40, and divided the precinct into three school districts, appointing a school-committee for each.ANNALS OP EASIHAM. 395 The desire for change, — perhaps we should say progress, was not laid. The years 1760 to 1763 were times of local excitement; a strenuous effort being made by the town, first, with the aid of other towns, to lessen the number of courts in the county; and, next, by the people of the North Precinct, to be set off, either as a distinct township or district} The town finally consenting to this last measure, the North Precinct, or “ Billingsgate,” as called in the Act, was incorporated May 25,1763, by the name of Wellfleet, it being arranged that “ so far as the choice of repre- sentatives is concerned, the two towns shall continue associated ; but, in all other respects, shall each have full powers and privileges as are granted to other towns.” It was further agreed by the respective par- ties, that “ the privileges of whaling, fishing, oystering and harbors shall be enjoyed by both towns as before. Wellfleet being organized, this town paid over to the new township its full share of moneys remaining in the treasury for general purposes, viz., £21.10.8. The town of Eastham was thus shorn of a portion of its area and of its population; so that, from being in political importance the first township in the county, it became the fifth. It seemed, however, to receive new impetus from the change: educational privileges were at once increased and extended; school-houses were provided, — putting an end to the necessity of using as a substitute rooms in private dwellings; boundaries were defined; new highways were constructed, and old ones repaired; and divers public improvements indicated increasing prosperity. 1 Whether the desire to lessen the frequency of the county courts was prompted by the fact that litigation was infrequent and but few causes required the attention of courts, or because their locality was not controlla- ble, is a question that we may not decide.396 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY. And so well satisfied were the people with the dimin- ished extent of territory, that an application to the General Court by persons belonging to Harwich to be set off with their estates and annexed to Eastham, was met with a remonstrance.1 Exposure to the ravages of small-pox, at this time, induced an application of the town to the Quarter Sessions, to authorize a fine of any persons who, having been exposed to the infection, and having knowledge of the fact, should neglect to give timely notice to the selectmen. The population of the town was now 1331. The decay of the Indians — a subject of melancholy interest—was now almost consummated; the census returns for 1765 showed that there were but four remaining in Eastham.2 The Nausets, once numerous and powerful, were soon to be, like the mammoth, only known to have existed ! The readjustment of the bounds between this town and Har- wich in 1764,3 and defining the bounds between this town and Wellfleet in 1765,4 is all that we find, for some years, of general interest. Mr. John Snow died Feb. 15, 1766. In 1772, the South Precinct was bereaved of its beloved minister, the Rev. Joseph Crocker, who died March 2d, in the thirty-third year of his ministry. 1The applicants resided at Potanumaquut. The town subsequently consented to receive them and their estates with the Indian inhabitants • within the line. 2 The same census reported 11 in Wellfleet, and 91 in Harwich, the greater numbers of whom were at Potanumaquut, which, as stated in the preceding note, was, by and by, annexed to this town. A missionary con- tinued to labor among them a few years; but the race was inevitably doomed to fade away. In 1802 there remained but one* Indian within the bounds of the ancient Nauset, and only three at Potanumaquut. 8 These were declared to be: “ From the N. bounds of Namskaket, thence running southerly to a black-oak tree near Baker's pond, marked E. H. with a stone there placed; thence to the S. W. part of the pond to a heap of small stones in the edge of the pond; thence southerly to a stake and stones near Chatham road ; thence southerly, following the road; thence to the S. E. in the Bay by a rock at the edge of the water; thence to Potanu- maquut harbor, as the channel now runs. 4 The bounds between Eastham and Wellfleet: “ Beginning at a white- oak tree at the head of Indian Brook, marked on the S. side E. and on the N. side W.; thence running due E. by marked trees to a pine-tree marked E. on the S. side, and W. on the N.; thence E. to the back side; and from the first mentioned bounds at the head of Indian brook, running west- erly, as the brook runs, to a stake on the beach at the mouth of said Indian brook, crossing the end of Billingsgate Point to Barnstable Bay.”ANNALS OP EASTHAM. 397 Mr. Jonathan Bascom was called to succeed Mr. Crocker, and was ordained Oct. 14.1 In the times of trouble that preceded the open rup- ture between the colonies and the mother country, this town was by no means an indifferent observer of passing events; nor, when the ordeal came, were the people backward to assert and maintain what they regarded as American rights. The situation of the town was, it is true, one of peculiar exposure; in the event of a resort to arms, its maritime interests must suffer, and its dwellings be at the mercy of those who controlled the seas; but we are not aware that a majority of its inhabitants ever quailed under the apprehension of danger, or shrunk from duty. In 1773, at a meeting duly convened, Feb. 27, to deliberate and express opinions in regard to matters of public grievance, Capt. Solomon Pepper was chosen moderator, and patriotic resolutions reported by a large committee were adopted: — “ 1. That the several Acts of Parliament which are so generally complained of by these colonies are manifest violations of our rights. “ 2. That we would be happy if the connection might be con- tinued between Great Britain and these colonies, and they be governed according to the true spirit and meaning of our several charters, and the British constitution. “3. That we justly dread the consequences which the burdens we groan under must, if not removed, produce. 1 Of Mr. Crocker it has been said, that " although not gifted with popu- lar eloquence, he was a hard student, of very respectable attainments, pru- dent, of great mildness, affectionate in disposition, and a bright exemplar of virtue’s excellence.” The inscription on his tomb-stone says: “ Here lies all that was mortal of the Rev. Joseph Crocker, the pious, faithful, and respected pastor of the church in this town, who, willing rather to be absent from the body and present with the Lord, died Mar. 2, 1772, in the 58th yr. of his age, and the 33d of his ministry.” Mr. C. was b. in Be. 1714, was twice m., and had 3 ch. viz.: Josiah, who was called to the min- istry in Y.; Lucia, who m. Rev. Simeon Williams, of Weymouth; and Anne, who m. Rev. Wm. Shaw, of Marshfield.398 HISTORY OF BARNSTABLE COUNTY.