Cornell University Library BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henry W. Sage 1891 Lets te | Coen 2762 ae Cornell University Library arv 18891 3 1924 031 261 641 olin,anx BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS FOR PRACTITIONERS HANDBOOK OF BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS FOR PRACTITIONERS INCLUDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF THE BLOOD BY W. D’ESTE EMERY, M.D., B.Sc. Lonp. LECTURER ON PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM PHILADELPHIA P. BLAKISTON’S SON & Co. ror2 WALNUT STREET 1902 PRINTED BY H. K, LEWIS, 136 GOWER STREET, LONDON, W.C. PREFACE. No practitioner who wishes to do his best for his patients and to promote his own interests can afford to neglect any means of clinical investigation which may help him to arrive at a correct diagnosis, and offer hints as to prognosis and treatment. Pre-eminent among the more recent methods of investigation are those which are applied by the bacteriologist; and it is no exaggera- tion to say that in many of the infective diseases a diagnosis which is made without a_bacterioscopic examination is either mere guess-work or can only be made so late that the patient has suffered unnecessarily in health and the practitioner in prestige. In many cases, however, the investigation requires a consider- able amount of technical skill and access to a well- equipped laboratory; the former may perhaps be pos- sessed by the rising generation (for bacteriology is now an integral part of the medical curriculum), but it would be unfair to expect every medical man to add the latter to his already expensive equipage. But in many cases the diagnosis can be arrived at by very simple means—a few slides, cover-glasses, and stains, a good microscope (which ought to be considered as essential as a stethoscope), and a very moderate amount of technical skill will often enable the practitioner to arrive at correct diagnosis in a very short time. This little book is intended in the first instance to show exactly when this may be done, and to provide clear, succinct, and full descriptions of simple methods which may be employed. ‘The descriptions of the operations which the practitioner can carry out for himself are mostly written in the imperative mood, and are in- tended to be referred to constantly and carried out, step by step, during the process. They represent the in- vl PREFACE. structions which would be given by a teacher when watching a beginner making a simple bacteriological examination for the first time. It cannot be too strongly urged that the practitioner should make the examination for himself whenever it is possible for him to do so. The report which is sent from a public laboratory may often be of very consider- able value, but it must be remembered that the bac- teriologist can only supply facts, and the inferences which may be drawn from those facts will largely depend upon a knowledge of the patient’s clinical history and the method in which the material was obtained. The bacteriologist is too often in the posi- tion of a detective who has to unravel a mystery from observations made by other people, and has no oppor- tunity of making investigations for himself. A bacterio- logical examination which is made by one person and interpreted by another, or which is made on material which has passed through more hands than one, loses much of its value; and an investigation made on the spot may be more valuable than one made by a bac- teriologist of far greater experience at a distance. The methods which are described in this little book are not in all cases the ideal ones, and in some cases they are somewhat different from those which are generally used, but they are simple and efficient. Of course, the simple examinations which are described here would frequently be supplemented by more com- plicated cultural ones by a trained bacteriologist. The methods described here have been taught in the post-graduate classes which were initiated some two years ago in the University of Birmingham; these have already been attended by about a hundred practitioners, who have found these methods of great assistance to them in their everyday practice. They have been selected so as to provide examples of some of the more important operations in constant use in the bacteriological laboratory. The author takes this opportunity of expressing his cordial thanks to Professor Leith for his kind suggestions as to the general scope of the book. PREFACE, vil No apology will be made for the numerous repetitions which will be found in this book. They are essential to its scope, which is to give clear accounts of the processes with as little reference to other chapters as possible. In the majority of cases each section is complete in itself. These instructions are followed by information as to the interpretation of the results which may be obtained ; and this information applies equally whether the medi- cal man has made the examination for himself or has obtained it ready made from a public laboratory. It too commonly happens that practitioners feel themselves aggrieved because they get a negative report (as to the presence or absence of Widal’s reaction) on blood taken during the first few days of an illness which turns out to be typhoid fever, or are inclined to discredit bacterio- logical examinations because diphtheria bacilli are found in throats which exhibit no membrane and clear up in a few days without serious symptoms. In the second place, there are a good many cases in which the investigation had better be made in a public laboratory. In these the questions, of what to send, and how to send it, are fully explained. This a most important point. A bacteriologist is not a magician who is able to weave a spell if he has a small portion of his victim’s anatomy to work upon; and the materials must be taken in the proper way if his results are not to be useless or even misleading. This is well seen in the examination of the blood for bacteria. In many cases the blood is drawn in such a manner that it must necessarily be contaminated from the skin during the operation and is transmitted in vaccine tubes which were almost certainly not sterile before being filled. Under such circumstances the bacteriologist will probably report the presence of streptococci or staphylococci, and the practitioner who does not understand the fallacies of the examination may be led to make a diagnosis which will be disastrous to his own reputation and may be injurious to the patient. Lastly, it need scarcely be said that this is not intended to be a substitute for any one of the numerous vili PREFACE. excellent works on the science of bacteriology which are current at the present time. The practitioner is strongly recommended to supplement the very meagre details concerning the life-history and pathogenic action of the bacteria which are dealt with here by a study of one of these textbooks. Muir and Ritchie’s admirable ‘Manual of Bacteriology,” Crookshank’s ‘“‘ Bacteriology and Infective Diseases,’ Hewlett’s ‘ Bacteriology,” Klein’s ‘ Micro-organisms and Disease,” McFarland’s “Textbook upon the Pathogenic Bacteria,” or Curtis’s ‘Essentials of Practical Bacteriology” are all suitable for this purpose, and a perusal of any one of them will be both pleasurable and profitable to every medical man. Several illustrations have been borrowed from sources mentioned in the text and for the loan of these the author wishes to express his best thanks to the respec- tive authors and publishers. His best thanks are also due to Messrs. Baird and Tatlock, Swift and Son, Zeiss, Leitz, Hawksley, and Hearson, for kindly pro- viding illustrations of apparatus made by them. CONTENTS. PART I. APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. The Bacteriological Microscope Sterilisation of Apparatus Preparation of Culture Media Inoculation of Culture Media Incubation of Cultures Method of Examining Cultures Gram’s Method of Staining Examination of Films—Use of Microscope Stains : : 7 Cleaning Slides and Cover-Glasses Pipettes PART II. DIAGNOSIS OF CERTAIN DISEASES. Diphtheria Tetanus : - The Pneumococcus, Pneumonia, &c. Influenza Anthrax . Tubercle Leprosy Actinomycosis Glanders . Typhoid Fever Gonorrhea Cholera Plague Soft Sore Ringworm PAGE 12 22 25 29 32 34 37 39 40 43 55 60 64 65 72 79 80 82 83 99 105 107 109 III X CONTENTS. PART III. COLLECTION AND EXAMINATION OF CERTAIN MORBID MATERIALS. PAGE The Collection of Pathological Exudates_ . : - 118 The Pleura : . . : : 120 Fluids from Joints i . : . 124 Lumbar Puncture . ‘ : 126 The Collection of Pus. . ; + 135 Collection of Material at Post-mortem Examinations i 140 Examination of the Blood . . . . %I4r Estimation of the Red Corpuscles : : 5 142 Estimation of the Number of Leucocytes_ . : » 52 Estimation of the Amount of Haemoglobin 3 y 155 Preparation of Films for Staining . : + I60 Fixation of Blood Films : 7 164 Staining Blood Films for the Investigation of ier Cells » 166 The Bacteriological Examination of the Blood . . 169 Examination for Bacteria in Films : : - I7I Malaria . . . 173 Collection of Blood i Hyannaaton by Cultural Methods » 175 Examination of Blood by Cultural Method - 7 180 Section Cutting : é . - 182 Fixing Material for Cutting ‘i . ¢ 185 Section Cutting by the Freezing Method , < . 187 Staining and Mounting Sections . . : 190 The Paraffin Process . : t a » Ig2 Dehydration : : F ‘ E Ig2 Clarification . : : + 193 Infiltration with Paraffin : . 2 ; 193 Casting the Blocks 5 - : ‘i . 94 Cutting the Section A : 195 Staining and Mounting Paraffin Béetione : ‘ - 198 Appendix 7 3 i : i 205 Index : ‘ : ‘ : » 209 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. IG. 1. Bacteriological Microscope (Leitz) 2. Bacteriological Microscope (Swift) 3 & 4. Portable Microscope (Swift) 5 & 6. Hot Air Sterilizer (Baird & Tatlock) 7 8. Oe TO. Il. 12. 13. 14. I5. 16, 17. 18. IQ. 20x 21 22. 23% 24. 25. 26. 28. 29. 30. BI. 32. 33+ Steam Sterilizer (Baird & Tatlock) Platinum Needles (Crookshank) Method of inoculating cultures Hearson’s Incubator Cornet’s Forceps (Baird & Tatlock) Pipettes . Petri’s Dish (Baird & Tatlock) . Stab culture of anthrax bacillus (Crookshank) Young colony of anthrax bacillus (x 16) (Crookshank) Hanging-drop preparation (Crookshank) Widal’s reaction (microscopic) . Method of filling pipette for Widal’s reaction Widal’s reaction (macroscopic) Microsporon Audonini (Curtis) Trichophyton endothrix (Curtis) Trichophyton ectothrix (Curtis) Thomas’ Hemocytometer (Zeiss) Method of counting red corpuscles Method of counting leucocytes Gowers’ Hzmoglobinometer (Hamibsies) Oliver’s Heemoglobinometer Method of spreading blood-films Malarial parasites Pipette for collecting blood Cathcart’s Microtome (Baird & Tatlock) Moulds for embedding in paraffin (Baird & Tatlock) . Clamp for Cathcart’s Microtome (Baird & Tatlock) PAGE 4&5 7&8 Ir 22 23 26 32 41 70 70 71 89 92 97 98 114 II5 116 143 150 153 156 158 163 174 178 189 195 196 PLATE I e Fig 5 wv tits IS) te ott x a Lig 2 Lig 5 WEE. delt. DESCRIPTION OF PLATE I. Fic. 1.—Diphtheria bacillus (long form) from a young culture on blood-serum. Léffler’s blue; x 1000. Fic. 2.—Diphtheria bacillus (short form) and Hoff- mann’s bacillus. From young cultures on blood- serum. Ld6ffler’s blue; x 1000. Fic. 3.—Pneumococci in sputum from a case of pneu- monia. Stained with dilute carbol fuchsin and thoroughly washed; x 1000. Fic. 4.—Anthrax bacilli. The lower portion of the field shows bamboo-like chains and spores, and is taken from cultures. Methylene blue; x 1000. The portion showing spores is stained with carbol- fuchsin, decolorised by brief immersion in methy- lated spirit, and counterstained in methylene blue. Fic. 5.—Pus showing streptococci. Stained by Gram’s method, counterstained with eosin; x 1000. Fic. 6.—Pus showing gonococci and_ staphylococci. Stained by Gram’s method and counterstained with dilute carbol-fuchsin; x 1000. nS PLATE II as — he Pag a ™ ae ae aN hy — N Lig Fig l fig &