é pany a 53 ae ee wo Do Gr ~ CORNELL 3 | UNIVERSITY | | b's LIBRARY 3 . = " “: Ss B Cornell Un iversity Library a >. HE 1643.29 1921 W772 Ls Before the Interstate Commerce Commissio oy oli INO iit 0 { TF Sad ers 924 7 A we eae ee eee ee ee ee ots 1943 £4 “1921 M7 2s BEFORE THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION DOCKET No. 11756 NEW ENGLAND DIVISIONS CASE BANGOR & AROOSTOOK RAILROAD CO., ET AL VERSUS ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD CO., ET AL TESTIMONY BY W. H. WILLIAMS Chairman of Special ‘Committen of Presidents, Trunk Line and Central Freight Association Lines WASHINGTON, D. C. JANUARY 28 AND FEBRUARY 7, 1921 KT 44 Le 7 ¢ Wb dye 3 te a UGE be, ee 4 ¢ WILLIAM HENRY WILLIAMS was called as a witness in behalf of the defendants and, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION BY Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Mr. Williams, you are Chairman of the Special Committee of Presidents, organized to consider the matters in this case? A. Yes, sir. Q. Will you state your experience in railroad work? A. I began railroading in 1890, as Assistant to Cashier in local freight office of the Pennsyl- vania & Hocking Valley, at Toledo. During, I think, all of 1891 and part of 1892, I was on the engineering corps of the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie, and in the forepart of 1892 I went with the Super- intendent of Telegraph of the Pennsylvania, and in the fall of 1892 became attached to the Gen- eral Manager’s office of the Pennsylvania Lines West, and worked on various desks in that office until in 1896, when I became Secretary to the General Manager. I subsequently was made Secretary of the Association of Transportation Officers, the Special Committee on Blanks which had charge of the introduction of economical methods, and along about 1900, I think, I became Chief Clerk to the Vice President in Charge of Operation. Around 1900 or 1901, I became Assistant Secretary of the Baltimore & Ohio, assigned to spe- cial work, more particularly along economic lines. Something like a year later I was made Assistant to the General Manager, having in charge the station service, the make-up of fast freight trains, investigating yard operations and various other special work which was assigned to me from time to time by the General Manager. In the spring of 1904 I was made Superintendent of Freight Transportation, yard and station service on the Frisco and Chicago & Eastern Illinois, having charge of the freight movement, the yards and stations, as I recall, on about 6,000 miles of line. I left that company, owing to a change of management, in October of the same year. I think along about February—I am not quite sure as to the time—anyway, early in 1905, I took up special work for the General Managers’ Association of New York, and subsequently, in the same year, pursued the same lines for the General Managers’ Association of Chicago, the work for the two Associations going along together, making inquiries as to rates of pay in train service, yards, station service, shop service, telegraph operators and maintenance-of-way men. My recollection is that the study for the General Managers’ Association of New York was lim- ited to the men in engine and train service, but all the other branches were covered for the Gen- eral Managers’ Association of Chicago. a Then, in the spring of 1905, I became Traffic Manager of the Merchants’ & Manufacturers’ Association of Pittsburgh, and subsequently, when that Association was merged with the Chamber of Commerce, I became Traffic Manager of the Chamber of Commerce of Pittsburgh. I continued to do that work, as well as the work for the General Managers’ Associations of New York and Chicago. About May or June, 1907, I was appointed Assistant to the President of The Deleware and Hud- son Company, and I think in October—either October or November; my recollection is October— of that year I was elected Vice President of The Delaware and Hudson Company, in charge of the Treasury and Accounting departments. Following that 1 was made a member of the Committee of Twenty-five which at that time was making the recommendations and cooperating with the Interstate Commerce Commission in pre- paring the system of accounts which subsequently was adopted. Q. That was a Committee of the American Acounting Association? A. That was a Committee of the Association of American Railway Accounting Officers. Immediately after the organization of the Wabash Railway Company, I was elected Chairman of the Board. For a brief period during Federal control, following the death of the President of that Company, I was also President of the Wabash, until the property came back to us for operation. My present position is Chairman of the Board of the Wabash and Vice President of The Dela- ware and Hudson Company. Q. Now will you describe, in your own way, the investigations which you have made bearing upon this case and the results of those investigations? A. I would say that I came into this case at the first informal conference in Washington—no. My first connection with the question at all was as a member of the Eastern Presidents’ Conference. That was prior to the matter being brought before the Interstate Commerce Commission. There there was more or less discussion of the subject, but in so far as this case was concerned I first heard of it a day or two before the first informal hearing, when advice came to me at Chicago, and I attended the first informal conference here, immediately after which the Committee of Presidents was appointed, consisting of Messrs. Pearson, Hustis, McDonald, representing the New England lines, and Messrs, Rea, Smith, Truesdale, Underwood, Duncan, Alfred and myself, representing the lines outside New England, and subsequently Mr. Maher was added. Mr. Bird M. Robinson, Presi- dent of the Short Line Association, was also elected a member of that Committee. At the time of its organization I was selected as Chairman of the Committee. As a result of that, I have, of course, been present at the various conferences which have been held, and by reason of my connection have found it necessary to make a study, to the extent I could, of the matters at issue. I have endeavored to analyze the testimony of the complainants, and nore particularly along the question of the cost of operation. 2 Taking the matter up in its entirety, the application of the New England lines, if granted, would result in a very substantial re-distribution of whatever gross freight revenues may result to the Eastern Rate Group under the schedule provided for by the Interstate Commerce Commission in Ex Parte 74. Attempt is made to justify such a re-distribution on grounds which may be summarized as follows: (1)—It is assumed by the New England carriers, that although the Interstate Commerce Com- mission has exercised its discretion by forming a rate group consisting of what had been known for many years as Official Classification territory, it is still appropriate to separate that group into distinct districts for the purpose of considering whether one of them has obtained the full statu- tory return. (2)—Assuming that such a separation may be made, the New England lines assert that if the territory in which they operate is considered as a distinct group, it will be found that they will receive approximately $25,000,000 annually less than the six per cent return on the value of their property, and that about $25,000,000 has been gained by all the other carriers in the rate group, considered as an aggregate, which would not have been gained if the New England railways had not been included with them in a single group. Aside from the legal question of whether the facts suggested by the foregoing, if they actually exist, would justify divisions intended to effect a re-distribution of the gross freight rates, this appli- cation raises at least the following questions: (1)—Whether the lines operating in New England territory, considered in combina- tion, are in fact separated from the other carriers in the Eastern group by actual differ- ences that justify treating them in such combination as a distinct group. (2)—Whether the operating costs of the New England lines are so adversely affected by inadequacy of facilities or by methods still susceptible of improvement that their gross operating revenues do not now yield proper operating income. (3)—Whether the rate structure of the New England lines, including both passenger and freight rates is such that they derive reasonable revenue from traffic local to New England and from the traffic which they interchange with lines other than those in the Eastern rate group. (4) Whether the lines constituting the balance of the Eastern rate group, consid- ered in combination, but excluding the New England lines, will actually obtain $25,000,000 or any comparable sum, more than the six per cent return to which they would have been entitled if placed in a separate rate group and whether the New England lines will actually receive $25,000,000 less than they would had they been made a separate group. (5)—Whether the changes proposed in this proceeding would, considering the New England lines alone and irrespective of injustice to their connections, divert revenues to the railways and in the proportions, if any, in which it is needed. The foregoing will be discussed in their order. 3 FIRST ARE THE LINES OPERATING IN NEW ENGLAND TERRITORY, CONSIDERED IN COMBINATION, IN FACT SEP- ARATED FROM THE OTHER CARRIERS IN THE HASTERN GROUP BY ACTUAL DIFFERENCES THAT JUS- TIFY TREATING THEM IN SUCH COMBINATION AS A DISTINCT GROUP? It is submitted that this proceeding does not require any inquiry as to whether conditions exist that might justify the exclusion of New England from the Eastern rate group and estab- lishing that region as a separate group. If thus set off and treated independently, the railways of these six States would plainly be entitled to a rate schedule so adapted to any special conditions therein found, including their heavy proportion of passenger traffic, as to produce in its entirety the same rate of return upon their investment as the Commission allows on the aggregate invest- ment of the carriers in each of the other rate groups. The Commission, however, exercising the discretion conferred by the Transportation Act of 1920, and with the complete acquiescence of the New England carriers, determined to unite that region with the Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territories, and it would be most unsuitable to attempt, here and now, to suggest considerations that cannot be assumed to have been overlooked. The present application does not, however, suggest a regrouping of Eastern territory, but its whole basis is the assumption that the present grouping is to be continued and, on that assump- tion, it seeks a re-distribution of the income accruing and to accrue to the respective railways within the Eastern rate group. And it supports this effort by contending, in substance, that it is desirable and proper to erect sub-groups within the group lawfully created by the Commission, and alone recognized by the statute and to look to and provide for the fiscal requirements of the sub-groups thus erected, even though in order to do so it is necessary to take without compensation, from some or all of the remaining carriers in the Eastern rate group. Presumably, in providing for rates adapted to produce a statutory rate of return in respect of all the railway property in any group which the Commission, in its sound discretion might erect, Congress must have recognized the mathematical fact that provision for such an average return would necessarily result in returns to some carriers above, and to others below, the statutory per- centage. The Transportation Act of 1920 plainly contemplates leaving the individual railways in each group to obtain such results as they are able from the group rates, relying upon their respective advantages (or lack of them) in location; efficiency of management, design and organization. To do otherwise would confiscate the economies of some railways and might place a premium upon the inefficiency of others. If such discriminations within groups are to be made it would perhaps seem easier to obtain a measurably satisfactory return at the expense of other carriers, or by diverting shares of the revenue in which the Government may have a substantial interest, than to obtain equally satisfactory results by the development of economies. It would tend to discourage future expenditures of money to effect economies of operation should increased returns obtained by past expenditures for such purposes, be diverted to less progressive lines. 4 Moreover, there is nothing in the conditions peculiar to New England which would warrant the action proposed. These peculiar conditions are (1) the very high proportion of passenger train mileage to total train mileage, (2) the high proportion of less than carload freight as compared with total freight tonnage, (3) the very substantial volume of traffic moving in and out of New England by water, owing to the concentration of population within a narrow area adjacent to tide- water, (4) the fact that the territory is contiguous on only the west to other portions of the Eastern rate group and (5) the character of the products of its manufacturing establishments. In other respects conditions in New England are closely paralleled elsewhere. Railways that are unable to earn a fair return under existing conditions can be found in any region. Only the three southern- most States of New England show the relatively high proportion of passenger traffic that exists there and, it is not evident that with a proper adjustment of passenger rates this situation would not have its compensations. In connection with the water situation as it affects the railways of New England, I have had taken off of the 1910 census returns a statement of the population in each of the New England States located within 25 and 50 miles of tide, the work being done for me by Marwick, Mitchell, Peat & Company, chartered accountants. By ATTORNEY EXAMINER GERRY: Q. You say 1910? A. Yes. Those were the latest figures available—at least, available to me in the time I had. I understand the present census has been completed, but I haven’t got the official data. I shall, however, be glad, if the figures are available, to make a similar statement at this time. That statement I offer as an exhibit. It shows that in Connecticut 64.75 per cent live within 25 miles of the coast line; 96.98 per cent live within 50 miles. As a matter of fact, the 50-mile stretch pretty nearly takes in the state. In Rhode Island, 98.55 per cent live within the 25 mile distance, and all of them, of course, live within the 50 mile distance, as the state is no wider than that. In Massachusetts, 51.2 per cent live within 25 miles of tide and 61.76 per cent within 50 miles. In New Hampshire, 19.44 per cent live within the 25 mile distance, and 57.15 per cent within the 50 mile distance. In Maine, 58.75 per cent live within the 25 mile distance, and 77.82 per cent within the 50 mile distance. Or, taking all New England, 56.21 per cent live within the 25 mile distance, and 73.04 per cent live within the 50 mile distance. Q. You say, “taking all New England?” A. All New England; yes, sir. Mr. Newcomb: I ask to have that received in evidence and marked as an exhibit. (The document referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendant’s Exhibit No. 130, Witness Williams,” and the same is forwarded herewith.) 5 The Witness: If especial difficulties exist in New England it can scarcely be otherwise than that they relate to local rather than to interchange traffic. The railways of that region take or deliver the traffic interchanged with other lines in precisely the same condition that their connec- tions deliver or take it. It is not transferred en route but arrives at the destinations in the cars in which it was originally loaded. The only exception to that is l. c. 1. traffic, which passes through transfer stations en route, moving in one direction or the other. By ATTORNEY EXAMINER GERRY: Q. You mean to say, by that, that if the loading in New England per car is lower than in Central Freight Association or Trunk Line territory, that fact does not affect the interchange traffic? A. That is correct; yes, sir. The tonnage in the car when given to us, of course, is just the same as it was moving over their line, or vice versa. The commodities and classes, the aggregate tonnage, the types of cars, the number of loaded cars, the average load in the cars, etc., are identical. Hast and west of New England this inter- changed traffic must require equal track facilities and equal expenditure of the efforts of men and motive power per mile of road haul and for yard service. Substantially equal station labor and station facilities must be necessary at the respective terminals. With these equivalent demands upon labor and materials, if the railways of New England are unable to operate upon equal terms with their connections, the difficulty must arise from insufficient local traffic or other local condi- tions and not out of anything directly appertaining to the interchanged traffic. The results obtained in any two or more sections of a rate group result from their relative rate structures as well as their relative operating costs. The New England lines have undertaken to prove that the operating costs in New England are greater than on the other railroads included in the Eastern rate group. They have shown estimates of a division of the costs as between pas- senger and freight service. Although they have shown separately the traffic local to particular roads, the traffic local to New England territory and that handled by two or more New England carriers, and also the traffic interchanged with Trunk Line and Canadian roads, they have not sub- mitted any testimony as to their relative costs of handling these different classes of traffic. Nothing now in the record of this proceeding throws direct light upon the question whether the traffic local to particular lines and that exclusively interchanged among lines in New England territory is self- sustaining. I want also to raise some question as to the division of expenses between passenger and freight. The information is rather meager. They show the cost for certain selected items. Those are the items which can reasonably be distributed as between passenger and freight. The capacity of a railroad line is not measured by tons, not measured by passengers. The capacity of a line is measured in trains, and trains operated at varying speeds reduce the capacity of the line. 6 That is why, in France, all the trains moved at a uniform rate of speed during the war they were passenger or freight; and, therefore, when it comes to the fixed charges or the | the capital, and when it comes to the maintenance and other items of that kind in connec the main line, clearly, with two-thirds of the train mileage on the New Haven and consider 50 per cent of the train mileage on the Boston & Maine being passenger train mileage, assume that the passenger train service as to those lines would be called upon to carry it tion of the burden. Furthermore, strictly freight railroads do not maintain their track at quite the same as those with high speed passenger service. Now, as to the division of cost, there has been no testimony that I have seen separatins load from the less carload, the number of tons of each which are handled, and it would sary to have that subdivided as between the traffic local to one road, the tonnage which is between two or more carriers within New Engand and the tonnage moving to and from 1 lines. In subdividing the terminal cost which, as I understand it, includes the station cost, 1 worked it out on a ton-mile basis. It costs just as much to handle that ton of freight at < whether it moves one mile, sixty or a hundred. So there is no relation between ton-mile the station cost in the way in which it is used in this record. And, furthermore, there should be some analysis of the average length of haul, so as separately the average length of haul for traffic local to one road, the inter-line traffic handl New England and the inter-line traffic which is interchanged with the Trunk Line and ( roads. Cunningham Exhibit No. 17 shows that the average length of haul for revenue freig Grand Trunk Railway in New England and the seven railroads operated by the complain: ing the year 1918 was 100.64 miles. According to the Interstate Commerce Commission’s nary Abstract for the year 1918 the average length of haul for all New England carr 103.44 miles. Mr. Cunningham shows an average distance hauled of 153.39 miles for certa Line and Central Freight Association roads, while the Commission’s Preliminary Abstra an average of 144.23 miles for all of the roads in these territories. No attempt, however, has been made to compare the average length of railroads in } land with the railroads outside of New England, and presumably a road that is only 40 length could not have an average distance hauled in excess of that distance; and when we the many lines which operate from New York to Chicago, we would naturally expect to 1 slight difference in the average distance hauled. Cunningham Exhibit No. 17 shows, for the seven roads of the complainants, an a revenue ton miles of 8,802,281,375 and an aggregate revenue tonnage of 87,501,565. Mr. a testified that the tonnage figures include duplications, each ton being counted as a ton for each road by which it was handled, (that is, on pages 52 and 53 of the Record). Excluding duplica- tions, the tonnage was stated by him as 53,854,253 tons. Dividing this into the aggregate rev- enue-ton mileage indicates that were the seven complainant railroads to be consolidated into one system, the average length of haul of revenue freight would be approximately 163 miles. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Before you leave that subject, Mr. Williams, would the length of haul be affected by the concentration of population along the seaboard? A. That depends somewhat on the way it moves. With the railways as constructed it might possibly reduce the average length of haul on that part of the New Haven within Connecticut. There would be part of it that would not be materially affected. When it comes, however, to Rhode Island, I should not say that it would have any material effect. When it comes to Massachusetts, they certainly are fortunate in having the people at the east- ernmost end of the state. It gives them that large volume of traffic over the greater part of the line east of Mechanicville up to within 20 or 25 miles of Boston. I should say that they might reasonably expect to get the haul through to Ayer on the greater part of their traffic, and when it comes to Ayer then it begins to thin out. By ATTORNEY EXAMINER GERRY: Q. Mr. Williams, did you say that you knew of no testimony in the case as to the average length of the New England lines as compared with the average length of lines in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territory? A. As to the length of the roads, I do not recall it; no, sir. I have endeavored to go through the testimony. I have been on my back, in bed, a good part of the time, and I have had to read the extracts made for me in order to get through. If there is such testimony, of course I would accept it. Attorney Examiner Gerry: Is the Examiner correct in recalling that there was such testimony? Mr. Choate: Yes, Cunningham Exhibit No. 18. The Witness: Then, I withdraw that. That [ have not seen. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Did you conclude your comment on the length of haul? A. When it comes to Maine, it is purely a question of mathematics until you get over a certain distance, where the location of people along the coast tends to probably reduce the length of haul, as against being spread out over the state, as they are in most of the other states. 8 Vermont and New Hampshire are sparsely settled, and I do not feel that as to those states— well, New Hampshire is 84 per cent within 25 miles of tide. That leaves very few people for the rest of the state. But the relative number of people there is not so great. Of course, it would change the distribution of traffic if the people were not all concentrated in that limited space. I should assume, as to the lighter traftic lines, like those operating north, in New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine, that it then becomes a question as to the character of trafiic handled. To the extent that it is manufacturing, if it is centered all at one place, then it would have some effect; but if it is of an agricultural character, then it would not have, I assume, a very material effect. Now going oack to the 163-mile average distance haul, as the total tonnage reported by the seven lines aggregates 87,501,565 tons, and eliminating duplications reduces this totai to 53,854,253 tons, it is evident that 33,647,312 tons represent auplications of tonnage by reason of a consider- able volume of traftic being handied by at least two carriers and, therefore, that the New England lines do have a substantial volume of interchange or overhead traffic. They have shown the interchange traffic there on the local New England business, but I do not recall seeing the figures as to the twatlic coming from Trunk Lines which moves up in there; and the difference between that local interline tonnage and this figure, of 33,647,312, would indicate the traffic that apparently passes over one line to get to another. If station expenses in New England are greater than on other lines included in the Hastern rate group, the fact cannot properly be attributed to interchange traflic. I have prepared a state- ment from data contained in the Commission’s Preliminary Abstract of Statistics of Common Carriers for the year 1918 which shows that of 27,695,089 tons originating at stations in New Eng- land, located upon complainant lines, 4,042,218 tons, or approximately 14% consisted of less than carload traffic. All carriers in the Eastern Rate Group, other than thee New England carriers, originated an aggregate tonnage of 654,670,323 tons, of which 24,764,521 tons, or less than 4% consisted of less than carload traffic. I would like to offer that as an exhibit. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 181, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) Platform labor at stations is required for less than carload traffic only, and each consignment of less than carload traffic requires approximately the same clerical effort on the part of station and auditing forces as that required for a carload shipment. I offer as an exhibit a statement showing road freight locomotive miles and train switching and yard switching locomotive miles, freight service, during the year 1918, based on data contained in the preliminary abstract of the Commission. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 182, Witness Williams,” and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: From this Exhibit, No. 132, it appears that the total freight train switching and yard freight switching mileage of the New England lines, excluding the Canadian Pacific and 9 Grand Trunk, was 61.91 per cent of the total road freight locomotive mileage for the year 1918; while on the roads having interchange with the New England lines it was 68.10 per cent, and on all roads in the Eastern group other than the New England lines, it was 71.60 per cent. By MR. CHOATE: Q. Would you mind explaining just what the point of this exhibit is? A. What is that? , Q. Would you just state brietly what the point of this exhibit is? A. Yes; Iam coming to the question of facilities and terminal cost. It may be you have a lack of facilities. I am also going into the question of mileage. The next two go together. So far as this particular statement is concerned, it does not indicate, from that standpoint, that your switching service, in proportion to your road freight service, is out of line with the other terri- tories. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Why did you combine train switching and yard switching? A. It is purely a question for the operating man to determine which is the more economical, train switching or yard switching. If there is not sufficient switching service required at a sta- tion to necessitate the operation of an engine locally in switch service, then that switching is per- formed by the road freight crews. That is why the separation is made as between train switch- ing and yard freight switching. I combine them also in the total. That explains both. You must take them into consideration, because you may substitute one for the other. I offer, as an exhibit, a statement showing the miles of road operated during the year 1918, based on data contained in the preliminary abstract of the Commission for the year 1918. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 133, Witness Williams,” and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: This exhibit, No. 133, indicates that the percentage of yard track and all sidings to miles of road of the New England lines, excluding Grand Trunk and Canadian Pacific Railway, was 58.06%, while for all the roads in the Eastern rate group, other than New England, the percent- age was 71.46 and for the roads having interchanges with the New England lines the percentage was 88.98. I am going to take these three statements together. I offer, as an exhibit, a statement showing the average number of manufacturing establishments per mile of road, taken from page 57, Vol. 8, 1910 Census, or 13th Census of the United States. (This statement referred to was received in evidence, marked ‘Defendants’ Exhibit No. 134, Witness Williams,” and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: This exhibit, No. 184, shows that for each mile of road in New England there were 3.201 manufacturing establishments, while the average in the Middle Atlantic States was 3.257, in the East North Central States 1.348, and in the States of Delaware and Maryland it was 3.161. These data 10 do not suggest any significant difference between the distribution of industries in New England and in the balance of the Eastern rate group. The effect of the slight difference that appears can- not have been very great. By ATTORNEY EXAMINER GERRY: Q. Does the census report show the total capitalization of the industries by the same dis- tricts? A. My recollection is it does. I can furnish that. I have it, I think, later, as to total for New England, and then I simply use the total of the group outside; but I could work that out, I think, by these same districts. I think it is shown by states, so that it could be shown, if you would like to have that done. Q. Suppose you supplement this exhibit with that data? A. Very well. I would call attention there to Exhibit No. 132, that while it shows the train switching on the New England lines, the train switching mileage on the New England lines is a little greater per- centage of the road freight mileage than is the fact for the rest of the Eastern group; as to yard switching, theirs is only about 50 per cent of the total, while the rest of the group is much in excess of that percentage of the total. So, it is by bringing those two together, the two items which cannot be considered separately, that we get the full relation, and a better basis of com- parison. It has been suggested by the complainant lines that they have a heavier expense in handling the traffic they receive from us, by reason of the necessity of distributing that over New England, which they claim makes the cost heavier than ours. They did not, however, give any consideration to all of the things which go into the collection of this freight before we forward it to them. The quantity of cars which they receive at each of the important junctions in a day clearly indicates that they are in the same position we were at our initial point, in so far as their ability to make up trains from the starting point is concerned, excepting that we have to go around to the dif- ferent industries and collect that stuff to get it into our working yard and classify the freight before we can get the tonnage moving forward. It makes no difference when it comes to the junction point. All they have to do is to classify it, then, for their own lines, and they are in a position to make up full trains. When you come to look, however, westward, the situation is somewhat dif- ferent. To a large extent your eastbound movement is carload traffic, and therefore you can deal pretty largely with just cars; but when you go westward and you go into the question of distribu- tion, we have the proposition of distributing all over the United States, and of course, so far as the defendants are concerned, or so far as those in the Eastern rate group are concerned, distributing over our territory and passing on to our connections beyond less than carload traffic in much greater proportion than any less than carload traffic we give to the New England lines. For example, take the less than carload freight coming to The Delaware and Hudson from the Boston & Maine. All of that traffic reaches us at Mechanicville. A very substantial part of that traffic must go to the transfer station at Mechanicville for rehandling. 11 By Mr. NEwcoms: Q. Does that go to Mechanicville in carloads, although it is less than carload traffic? A. All freight interchanged is handled in cars. Q. It goes in practically full carloads to Mechanicville, does it not? A. It would vary in volume, depending on the quantity of traffic moving from their various loading stations. Generally speaking, traffic moving to transfer stations has a greater average ton- nage than the traffic moving on the final 50 or 100-mile run, where the distribution is ultimately made. After that traffic is handled at Mechanicville, assume, for example, it is going to a point between Columbus and Indianapolis, on the Pennsylvania. As to how it is loaded, that is dependent upon the volume of tonnage at the time. You load it in a car for Wilkes-Barre transfer, which is a junction point between the Pennsylvania and The Delaware and Hudson. Hither Mechanicville or Wilkes-Barre, as the case might be, would make a car for Pittsburgh transfer, unless there was suffi- cient volume of traffic to justify making a car for Columbus, Ohio. Handled at Pittsburgh transfer, they load it in a car for Columbus, and when it moves out of Columbus on a train headed towards Indianapolis, the traffic is then handled by the way-freight crews; so that as against the distribution of carload traffic in New England, we have a very much more expensive job of distributing less than carload tonnage west of New England. Of course, to the extent that we receive carload traffic from New England, we have all the expense of distributing that carload traffic. Attorney HKxaminer Gerry: We will take a recess for five minutes. (At this point a brief informal recess was taken, at the conclusion of which the hearing was resumed as follows:) Attorney Examiner Gerry: You may resume, Mr. Newcomb. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Will you proceed, Mr. Williams? A. As I said, in the statement with reference to the work of distribution, consideration must be given to the work of assembling and other work incidental to getting that traffic in trains. For example, you have the industries spread out over your line, and have to go around and pick up the car, just the same as the New England lines have industries or consignees distributed over their line and have to peddle them out. Now, it may be true that at the point of origin there will be a greater tonnage originating with one shipper than the volume of traffic handled by one consignee. But I have seen no comparison of the figures of that kind. But take, for example, a mine. The originating line has to furnish the cars, as a rule. The mines do not work Sundays, and they do not work holidays. Generally speaking, the consignees do not, so, to that extent, we are about even. But in the mines they have a different idea of holidays than usually the employes of the consignee. In the anthracite mines they celebrate every church holiday, practically, and they celebrate the national holidays of practically all the countries represented by the employes at the mine. 12 We have something over 32 dialects. They also have what are known as “button strikes.” That is the means provided for collecting the dues. This is also true as to bituminous mines. If the dues are not paid, the men decline to go in the mine until the employe is wearing a union button. That means the mines close down at least for that day. Then, you must have the cars in sight for loading. The men will not go into the mine in the morning unless there are some cars there to be loaded, some railroad cars. In the bituminous mines they are even more strict than the an- thracite. In many districts they take the position that there must be in sight sufficient cars to take care of a day’s operation. Now, to meet those conditions and to overcome the effect of any delays to your road move- ment, especially in the handling of your empty cars, getting them back through the day, you have got to get your empties there in advance of what you might do for another producer of tonnage. Generally speaking, we figure on having from 100 to 200 cars in the district over and above what we might need. That is, we count on having on hand and in sight, about 200 cars more than would be loaded, in order to reasonably insure the mines operating as against those adverse conditions. Q. Is that condition affected by the condemnation of coal loaded in cars? A. As to bituminous coal, generally speaking, that is not affected. In the case of anthracite, it all must be inspected for market, because it is mechanically prepared, and from 12 to 18 per cent. of the cars will be condemned after they are loaded, condemned as to the quality of the coal. Some of those cars, on reinspection, may go forward; but a substantial part of them, a very sub- stantial part of them, are placed back in the empty yard, and must pass through the breaker again for rehandling. Practically none of the mines has sufficient track capacity to hold enough empties for a day’s loading, and a loading yard to take care of a day’s operation. In some places it is necessary to switch twice, and in some places three and four times. After you have gotten all these cars loaded, in a bituminous or anthracite mine, you have dif- ferent sizes of coal. They are not quite as great in the bituminous as in the anthracite; and you have different customers for the different sizes. Then, you have customers located over a very great territory, and you are endeavoring to please each of them by helping them out a little, with the result that these cars are billed to various places and to all points of the compass, so that those cars must go into the working yard. All of those cars do not go just to one connection, and do not go a substantial distance. You will find that traffic starts going off within 10 miles, 20 miles, or 30 miles of its point of origin, so that you not only have to separate it by towns for movement over your own line, but you have to separate it for the various connections. But it necessitates that rehandling through the working yard, and when you start out of that classification yard, as I have said before, you are in no different position than the New England lines would be if at the point they receive the freight they classified that freight in the working yard so that they could make up their trains to move, just as we make up our trains to move over our line. When you get into other industries that do not produce the tonnage, quite possibly, in that volume, then, of course, you have a little different situation, but you do not have all these other 13 things, possibly, that 1 spoke of. But you still have to pick it up. You have the collecting expense, and in one case you simply put in the empty and pull out the load, while down in New England they put in the load and they may pull out the empty. While you have the empty haul back to us of the coal car, we have the empty haul of that car back to the mines. Professor Cunningham and Mr. Slater discussed at considerable length, in their testimony, the alleged adverse effect on the New England operations of the low average length of haul, and also of the numerous branch lines and the consequently large number of junction points, more par- ticularly with reference to the Boston & Maine and the New York, New Haven & Hartford Rail- road, which were said to be quite similar. { offer, as an exhibit, a statement of freight train and freight locomotive performance, mixed and special trains not included, for the 12 months of the calendar year 1919, compiled from monthiy statistics of the United States Railroad Administration, series O. S. 1-3. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked ‘Defendants’ Exhibit 135, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: This exhibit, No. 135, shows that the New England lines are able to utilize a higher proportion of the tractive power of their locomotives than other railways in the Eastern group. The per cent. of the tonnage actually moved to the engine rating on the railroads in the several operating districts defined by the Director General, and which are embraced in the Eastern Rate District during each month of 1919, are as follows: Months New England Central Ohio-Indiana Allegheny Pocahontas JAMA occa cccssscsscscpncconitesscctnce 66.4 59.0 60.1 60.7 68.3 FRO LUALY isos sssneeeecseseeseceseesecneee 69.0 61.0 63.2 63.0 72.2 70.5 63.7 66.1 66.2 74.7 74.1 68.3 67.0 69.5 74.2 75.4 71.1 67.6 12.9 16.7 76.0 As 69.2 73.8 76.8 15.8 F214 69.1 72.2 17.9 74.8 43.0- 70.1 74.0 78.3 76.2, “tt4— 70.7 73.5 17.7 76.3 70.4 69.3 71.5 77.2 NOVOM DEY occ eeeseceeesseecceeeeeeeenee 73.3 65.9 64.8 66.3 73.9 SBT =Xe1=1441 0) ee B 68.1 59.8 60.4 60.6 70.1 These percentages indicate that the loss of tonnage due to picking up and setting off cars between terminals and all other causes adversely affecting the ability to move tonnage equal to the rated capacity of the locomotives was less in New England than the average of all the other lines in the Eastern Rate Group. The same reports of the Director-General show that the difference be- tween the gross ton miles per locomotive mile obtained in the months of most favorable weather con- ditions and in those in which such conditions are most unfavorable to operation was smaller in New England than in the region west of the Hudson river. 14 According to Cunningham Exhibit No. 17 the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad had a higher aver- age length of haul for revenue freight than any other of the eight carriers shown thereon and ap- proximately 24% greater than the average for the eight lines. Notwithstanding this, the Bangor & Aroostook Railroad obtained an average of only 41 miles per locomotive day as against an average for the eight railroads of 48.7 miles. Although the conditions are said to be similar on the Boston & Maine and the New Haven, the former shows an average mileage per locomotive day of 54.5 miles and the latter an average mileage of only 41.9 miles. The Central New England, which had an average haul of only 70.44 miles or 70% of the average for the eight lines, had the third high- est average miles per locomotive day, namely, 52 miles, which was 3.3 miles greater than the average for the eight New England lines. By examination of the exhibit, which does show the gross ton miles per train mile, and an analysis of that column month by month, it is possible to show the loss of tonnage in winter months as against the tonnage handled in the summer months in the various groups adopted by the Direc- tor General for the purpose of operation during the period of Federal control. There has been some discussion of the relative amount of traffic handled into New England by water: They also handle traffic out of New England by water. I have no figures on the outbound. I offer, as an exhibit, a statement showing the tonnage of anthracite and bituminous, and the total coal tonnage moving into New England separately by rail and water, for the years 1917 and 1916. I think we have a later statement than that, whichI want to put in, which Mr. Pearson has furnished. We are trying to locate it. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 136, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: This also shows the water tonnage, separated as between tidewater and water, the tidewater tonnage being that part of the tonnage which reaches New England by water and moves back by rail? The water tonnage is not handled by the railroads. I offer, as an exhibit, a statement showing the tidewater shipments of bituminous coal to New England for the calendar years 1915 to 1920, both inclusive, shown separately by months, the figures being taken from the United States Geological Survey reports, No. 152 and subsequent reports. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 137, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: I would like to locate that other statement later, and have it inserted at this place, because it has a relation to these same figures. This statement shows, for bituminous coal, the tonnage reaching New England by water: LOLS sooesscsesns Sones satsseos ess 11,960,000 tons VOLO so te eee ee cote eee 12,686,000 “ WON P2225 Si Teen ree oes oS 11,798,000 “ TOTS oe he eee ei 15,268,000 “ 1919 Jos Ske oe ee eas S 8,385,000 “ PO2022.22cSs coos oo 2 ese esos ce 10,457,000 “ Later on there will be an exhibit introduced which will show the coal production of the coun- try, and it will indicate that 1918 was the year of maximum production, and that in 1919 there was a very, very heavy falling off as compared with 1918, while 1920 is the second highest in the history of the country. The figures are not materially out of line when giving consideration to the fluctua- tions in tonnage, and would indicate that possibly as to 1920 it was slightly below the average based on the total production, and assuming New England took as much coal as in other years. But I think the statement furnished by Mr. Pearson will show that a little bit more fully. Exhibit 136 showed that for 1917 the total coal forwarded to New England was 37,893,119 tons, of which 20,208,929 tons moved all rail; 4,929,907 tons reached New England by water and were then forwarded to destination by rail, and 12,759,283 tons reached New England by water and were not transshipped by rail. During the year 1916 the total reaching New England was 37,110,897 tons, of which 17,014,595 tons moved all rail, 5,941,142 tons reached New England by water and were transshipped by rail, and 14,155,160 tons reached New England by water and were not transshipped. Although the New England lines may originate no coal tonnage, Exhibit 136 indicates that coal reaching New England by rail and water constitutes approximately 47 per cent of the total freight tonnage—except that that does not give allowance for the other freight tonnage that might reach New England by water, and which I did not have. As to fuel costs, Prof. Cunningham’s statement of fuel costs, Exhibit No. 29, shows as follows, on basis of average cost, first eight months of 1920; and this is an estimate of the tons of fuel con- sumed during the calendar year. I do not believe it is necessary to read into the record the actual tonnage that is shown on the exhibit, but it is shown separately for freight service and for passenger service, and then the total for the two classes of service; the aggregate cost is shown, and a comparison with the total for Trunk and C. F. A. I do, however, want to call attention to the cost per ton. Bangor & Aroostook___.____--____-.-_---_---------- $7.15 Boston: & .Mame- 23 ee 7.19 Central New England______-_-______________________ 6.58 Central: Vermont) <5.) 222255050 ee en eo ee 6.85 Grand Trunk in New England______________--------- 7.92 Maine ‘Cent¥al 2.2 Soe ee ee ee 9.97 New Haven. sos 2e5 ooo Soe ee eee ee Se ee 7.28 Rutan Ge a a ale ear eae 5.14 The statement indicates a total of 2,048,715 tons for freight service; 1,581,670 tons for pas- senger service; total for both classes of service, 3,630,385 tons, at an aggregate cost of $26,759,725, or an average of $7.37. The total for Trunk and C. F. A. lines was shown as 28,777,551 for freight service, 10,997,366 16 for passenger service; total for both classes of service, 39,774,917, at an aggregate cost of $150,- 746,935, or an average cost per ton of $3.79. In Brigham Exhibit No. 5, the aggregate freight charges paid to Trunk Lines on fuel coal for the above New England lines, excluding the Grand Trunk, on basis of 1919 consumption (1920 being said to be much greater), is shown as $8,591,915 and 40% increase in said freight charges is shown as $3,824,634. Assuming that $8,591,915 represents the total freight charges and deducting that amount from $26,184,195, (i. e., the total cost shown on the Exhibit less cost to Grand Trunk $575,530), leaves a net cost, exclusive of freight charges, of $17,592,280, or an average price of $4.95 per ton. The average cost per ton of fuel coal for Trunk Line and Central Freight Association lines is shown as $3.79, but this cost of $3.79 per ton includes freight charges, so that the price exclusive of freight charges, would not be in excess of $3.50 per ton. I have to say that I have simply roughly estimated that amount and feel that 29 cents is probably an under-statement. In other words, the New Engiand lines are paying not less than $1.45 per ton for coal (exclusive of freight charges) in excess of the price paid by other lines, if I understand their figures. The lines west of New England are expecting to save ai least 50 cents per ton after April 1st, next, so that the New England lines should effect a saving of about $2.00 per ton. Generally speaking, our fuel coal is covered by contract; otherwise we would effect a substan- tial part if not all of that saving at the present time. The coal year ends March 31st; the con- tracts are all made on that basis. The fuel tonnage covered by Cunningham Exhibit No. 29 does not include all the New Eng- land lines, nor does it include the fuel coal reaching New England by water. I would say in con- nection with my Exhibit 136 that I am inclined to feel that it does not include the Bangor & Aroos- took and the Maine Central. I think it includes all other lines. In the statement of revenue needs of New England filed by counsel for complainants at the first informal hearing before the Commission, it is stated on page 3, that “The increased cost of fuel of 1920 over 1919 has been $13,000,000.” “The increased cost of fuel of 1920 over 1916 has been $25,000,000.” Cunningham Exhibit No. 29 shows the fuel consumed during the calendar year 1919 was 3,630,385 tons, and the estimated cost for 1920 is $26,759,725. Deducting $25,000,000 therefrom, would leave a cost of $1,759,725 to cover the price of coal at the mines, plus freight to New Eng- land on 3,630,385 tons, or for 1916 an average cost per ton for coal at the mines plus freight to New England of only 48.48 cents. Presumably the tonnage and costs include coal for road freight and passenger train engines only, and the estimates submitted at the informal hearing of the increased cost does not include coal for switching service, mixed train service, shops, stations, etc. Data for- warded to me by the Presidents of New England lines show a total fuel coal consumption on all New England lines in excess of 6,000,000 tons, which on basis of $2.00 per ton reduction in price f.o.b. mines would permit of an annual saving of approximately $12,000,000. 17 The Barge rates on bituminous coal moving from various Atlantic Seaboard ports to Boston and Portland according to data furnished me by Messrs. Garfield & Proctor, wholesale coal dealers, Boston, Mass., are as follows: BOSTON PORTLAND 1 yr. ago|6 mos. ag 1 yr. ago|6 mos. ago, Port 1919 1920, 1919 1920, Nov.& } June & | Present rate | Nov.& | June & | Present rate Dec. July Jan. 19, 1921 Dec. July Jan. 19, 1921 Perth Amboy (N. Y.)--| $2.00 $2.25 | $1.50 to $1.85] $2.15 $2.40 | $2.00 to $2.10 Philadelphia __________ 2.50 2.75 2.25 2.75 3.00 2.40 Baltimore ~___________ 3.00 3.29 2.50 3.25 3.50 2.65 Hampton Roads _______ 2.50 2.75 2.25 2.75 3.00 2.40 These rates indicate a substantial reduction since June and July, 1920. There has been placed in the record a statement which shows the barge rates in 1916 and 1917, as I remember the figures. Those indicate rates very substantially less than this. They do indicate that for the present the New England lines are paying more for water transportation than they did in those years. These figures, however, show a substantial reduction, and it is reasonable to expect that still further reductions may be secured. In fact, since securing this data I have been furnished, through the officials of the Chesapeake & Ohio, a statement of barge rates from Hampton Roads, showing, on tonnage other than Shipping Board vessels, a rate of $1.75 to Providence, $2.00 to Bos- ton, and $2.25 to Portland. To the extent that reductions occur in the barge rates, of course reductions can be had in the cost of fuel to the New England lines, in so far as the traffic moves by water or in so far as the rates then become lower than the all-rail rates. Mr. Cunningham and Mr. Brigham claim that under the 40% increase in freight rates the New England lines will pay $3,824,634 additional freight revenue to Trunk Lines. Normally, approximately 45% to 50% of the fuel coal for the New England lines reaches New England by water. Therefore, when figuring the increased cost of fuel on the basis of 40% of freight charges, he has apparently added 40% to the water rates, no part of which accrues to the Trunk Lines, or he has not given consideration to what the situation will be with the water rates more nearly normal. They have also included the freight charges presumably paid New England lines for their proportion of the haul. In this connection it should be borne in mind that coal mines are not located on the lines of all the carriers in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territory, and that many of these carriers buy coal at points which are not on their lines in order to procure it from mines nearer to the points of consumption and they are obliged to pay freight charges on such purchases. In other words, even those that have mines located on their lines go off their lines to buy coal by reason of the very long haul and the cost to them if they had to haul it the distance, and take it then from the nearer mines. Over 60% of the fuel coal used by the anthracite carriers, other than the Pennsylvania and Erie, which also have bituminous mines, is bituminous coal and must 18 be purchased at mines on other railroads. Little, if any, of the coal is loaded on the engines at the point of production, so that all roads, whether in New Engiand or outside of New England, must handle practically all their fuel from the points of origin to the places of consumption and the cost of transporting this coal has necessarily increased with the increased cost of labor, ma- terial, etc. The average length of haul of company freight on lines in the Eastern rate group, exclusive of the New England lines in 1918 was about 115 miles, while the distance such freight was carried by the New England lines was only 62 miles. Therefore, to the cost of fuel coal as shown in the reports, there should be added the cost of handling the extra distance of 53 miles on the lines west of New England and which cost necessarily has increased with our increased operat- ing charges. To the extent that the lines in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association terri- tories pay a smaller amount per ton for freight charges on coal, the difference is due to the natural advantages resulting from the proximity of their lines to the places at which coal is produced. The total production of bituminous coal in the United States during the calendar year 1920 was approximately 50,000,000 tons in excess of the average annual production of the preceding five years, and about 122,000,000 tons in excess of the average annual production, of the five-year period preceding the war. I offer as an exhibit a statement showing the bituminous coal production 1910 to 1920, showing also the total exported, and of that exported showing separately that exported to Canada. The total exported to Canada is included in the total export tonnage. It also shows the average per year, 1910 to 1914, which I term the five pre-war years, and the average for the five years 1915 to 1919, and separately the tonnage for the year 1920. (The statement so offered and identified was thereupon received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 138, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: I offer as an exhibit an extract from an article in the ‘‘Coal Age’ of December 23, 1920, on the bituminous coal price situation, showing the prices of spot steam coal, mine run basis, net tons f. o. b. the mines, for November, 1919, May, 1920, August 5, 1920, December 9, 1920, December 16, 1920, and December 23, 1920, and then, taken from subsequent issues of the same paper, the figures for December 30, 1920, January 6, January 13, and January 20, 1921, and which shows a very rapid fall in the price of coal. As you will note, I have been unable to get the printer to keep up with the reducing price. If I could get yesterday’s coal issue we would have still later figures. Mr. Newcomb: I ask to have that received and marked as an exhibit. (The statement so offered and identified was thereupon received in evidence, marked Defendants’ Exhibit No. 138, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: Exhibit 139 shows very substantial reductions in the price of coal f.o.b. the mines, and that the market is rapidly falling. In view of the over-production during the year 1920 as indicated by Exhibit 138 and the substantial reduction in industrial activity, it is reasonable to 19 anticipate that the price of fuel f.o.b. the mines after April 1st next will not, in normal times, be in excess of $3.00 per ton, based on present rates of wages and prices of material. I feel that $3 is an overstatement rather than an understatement of the price. I believe I stated in another case that the carriers west of New England wil! also be able to make material reductions in their prices of coal with the change in prices herein stated. It may be found that the disproportionate amount of passenger train service to freight train service in the New England States, and the volume of traffic moving by water to and from New England and other local disabilities, are sufficient to create a situation in that territory which does not exist in the balance of the territony > Row e. ‘aced within the Eastern rate group. This, how- ever, is a condition for which the rem ng lines in the Eastern rate group are in no way respon- sible and any losses sustained by the New England lines by reason thereof should not be trans- ferred to the other lines within the group. SECOND ARE THE OPERATING COSTS OF THE NEW ENGLAND LINES SO ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY INADEQUACY OF FACILITIES OR BY METHODS STILL SUSCEPTIBLE OF IMPROVEMENT THAT THEIR GROSS OPERATING REVENUES DO NOT NOW YIELD PROPER OPERATING INCOME? Exhibits Nos. 133 and 134 indicate a likelihood that the New England lines have insufficient yard facilities for handling their traffic. The adverse effect of insufficient facilities was well set forth in the New Haven report for the year 1919, as illustrated by the following extract from the remarks of the President of that Company, contained therein: “Increases in rates alone, except as they rehabilitate the Company and enable it to acquire funds for enlargement as the volume of traffic demands and the opportunities of better and more economical operation present, will not fully solve the problem; it also de- pends at the present time on increasing transportation capacity. “During 1916 and 1917 traffic exceeded capacity and was handled with difficulty. Except for the earlier portion of 1918 and the latter part of 1919, capacity for the rea- sons hereinbefore stated, was more nearly adequate. The result was the handling of the greater volume of traffic, not perfectly, but in a manner generally filling the demands. The operating results during the past eight months have again indicated lack of capacity during periods of heavy passenger travel, of heavier freight movement, and of unfavor- able weather. The road has been overtaxed accordingly. “Industry in the territory served by the New Haven expanded largely during war time. Two hundred and three industrial tracks were extended or added during the past two years. Present indications are that this expansion will continue. The confidence of those financially interested after the armistice is shown by the completion during the past eight months of ninety-three large additions to existing plants or of new construction on a large scale, smaller items not being included; of one hundred and sixteen additional similar items which are still under construction; and of information obtained throughout the territory which, although necessarily more or less problematical, indicates intention on part of those interested to proceed in the early future with construction plans for nu- merous additional extensions and improvements of the same general character. 20 “The New Haven system serves a territory with a population approximately fifteen million, but in particular there are, roughly, four million, including many large cities, which are served almost exclusively without other means of transportation. Its mileage is approximately 1% of that of the United States railroads. The gross revenues of the system about 214%, and the population exclusively served is roughly 334%. Prosperity of this latter depends almost entirely on the sufficiency of New Haven service. “Inadequacy of capacity results in congestion, delays to trains, and necessitates much extra work and duplication of endeavor to accomplish the final results. Service under such conditions is unsatisfactory to the public and uneconomical to the railroad. The in- creased difficulty of operation cannot but be adversely felt by the officers and employes. The trend of operating results is in the wrong direction. With adequate capacity, service to the public improves. The more favorable working conditions customarily prevailing un- der normal operation, become possible. The cost of transportation and of car hire can be brought more nearly to a minimum basis. Expenditures heretofore for increased capacity have been profitable and have also enabled a more effective use of the property as a whole. The return from some items is direct. Others indirectly contribute their portion toward capacity to economically and properly handle a large business. If the operating ratio is again lowered to say 70% of the income, roughly 30 cents from each dollar increase in revenue becomes available for net income.” The Witness: I would just say in that connection that of course that 70 per cent must have referred to the situation existing before the increase in rates. Generally speaking, we estimate that the increase in rates will cause an increase of about 8 to 10 per cent in the operating ratio; so in speaking of 70 per cent there I assume that, translated on the present-day proposition, that would be nearer 78 or 80 per cent. (Continuing): _ “Summarizing the necessity for increasing capacity, your company must provide such transportation that the requirements of the many communities depending entirely upon it will be met, otherwise the prosperity of its territory, which is necessary for its own prosperity will diminish. Satisfaction, support, and good-will of the public will re- sult from proper service. The improvement in working conditions will increase the effective results as well as the interest and loyalty of employes. All of these factors will operate toward the maximum net income. From whatever angle of view, the maintenance of the property in condition to normally meet the commercial demands is not only neces- sary, but promises in the end to be the most satisfactory and profitable. “The estimated needs on a minimum basis for power and for increased capacity dur- ing the present year are: 40 heavy freight locomotives 5 passenger electrics \ $3,500,000 Additions and improvements for increasing transportation capacity and securing economy in operation_________________-_______ 10,000,000 $13,500,000 “Of the above completion of the freight terminals at Cedar Hill and Providence are the most pressing. “With the consolidation of the several roads into the New Haven system, their small yards formerly existing have been continued in use. Such operation divides and sepa- rates what should be the proper handling of freight trains and cars. Traffic has in- creased beyond the capacity of these terminals. Classification cannot be kept up. Trains and cars are delayed. The capacity of the road as a whole is restricted. The terminal at Cedar Hill when completed, will enable the receipt of trains, however made up, and of 21 = cars, whatever their loading, from all directions, their proper classification and reloading, and then the forwarding in straight trains properly made up and cars properly loaded for destination to every important gateway and commercial center on the system. Such operation will unify, simplify and expedite the handling of freight. The Providence Ter- minal will perform corresponding service with a similar benefit to the lines East. Large advantages will accrue from decrease in cost of train and terminal service and in car hire. Capacity of the system will be increased. “Construction on both terminals was commenced in 1917. Work in 1918 could not be undertaken until the season was well advanced because financial arrangements were not earlier possible. A similar condition, resumption of work being at a still later date, ob- tained in 1919. The delays while unavoidable have been most discouraging. The present investment in each project is large. Partial and but small use can be made as yet of either, and the larger advantages which will ultimately result from their completion, are not being obtained. The present necessities are such that every endeavor will be made to complete to the extent needed for the present volume of traffic, during the coming season. The plans of both terminals not only provide for those portions now needed, but also for additions from time to time as traffic increases.” ari ee aes, Sa e I should like to say that there has been much done to improve the capacity and operation of the New Haven under Mr. Pearson’s management. I quite appreciate many of the difficulties which have confronted him during the war period and also during the period after the war, what we call our reconstruction period. The adverse effects of the coal strike which disarranged transportation, and subsequently the adverse effects of the outlaw railroad strike, necessarily have brought about con- ditions other than normal, and my only point in bringing these matters out at this time is to indicate the thought in my mind that these unusual conditions ought not to control the decision of matters which are now under discussion, when, as indicated—admitted by their own people—those conditions are within their power to overcome. And as to the general conditions which confront all of us, we should expect that they will get their operations back to normal as soon as we are able to get ours back to normal. I have more in mind there the question of methods of operation—the improve- ment which can be had in that direction. Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry) Mr. Williams, what effect does inadequacy of terminals have on the amount of per diem? A. Mr. Pearson testified that it is his feeling that there is some. If you are not in a position to make the proper classification of your trains in the initial yard where you handle the freight, you are going to increase the amount of work in each of the intermediate yards between there and the final destination of the freight. Generally speaking, the economic location of your terminals is a hundred miles. That is the ideal location for freight terminals—a hundred miles apart—for slow freight; but sometimes you have topographic conditions which make that impossible. For instance, take The Delaware and Hudson. Coming out of the coal territory that is congregated at Carbon- dale. Now, from there to Oneonta is considerably less than a hundred miles, and then from Oneonta across to Mechanicville is less than a hundred miles. Then you have a line coming from Binghamton across; that is the old Albany & Susquehanna; that goes to Albany, and you have numerous junction points in there. 22 The result there is that we have a constructive mileage of about 15 to 16 per cent. It is ab- normally high. A study has been made, and we are looking forward to see if it is going to be phys- ically possible to so arrange those terminals that we might reduce that constructive mileage. In speaking of constructive mileage, the agreements with the men obligate you to pay them so much per mile in engine and train service, and then with a minimum day. That is usually figured at a hundred miles; so that if you operate your crew only 85 miles you have a constructive mileage of 15 miles. You pay the same wage for the 85-mile service that otherwise you would pay for the 100; and those are conditions which confront every railroad. There is no railroad that has all of its terminals just a hundred miles apart. I have a situation confronting me out west that is a little on the other side. Under the old schedules before the passage of the Adamson law, and when your schedules were based on a ten-hour day, you could have your distance between terminals a little greater than a hundred miles, and in that case we were working to make the terminals nearer to- gether than farther apart. But the real effect of the thing is that you have got to pass it through that terminal every hundred miles unless you do the work in the first instance. When it comes to the next yard you have got to switch out, because there will be some branching off before you get to the next terminal a hundred miles away. Now, it is much cheaper to do it in that yard than it is to do it with train service; and the other thing is that if you escape the re-working through the classification yard you save that amount of time. I will illustrate later—I might say it now; I am coming to this question of per diem next. Q. Do not let me interrupt you. A. Ihave a point there, and I will bear in mind just what you said on that. I have a statement which I will offer, consisting of two pages, which will be Exhibit 140. The larger one ought to be No. 1 and the other No. 2, because it is a summary—140, sheet 1, and 140, sheet 2. (The statement referred to was thereupon received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 140, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: Exhibit 140, sheet 1, is a summary of operating statistics, New England lines, prepared from statistics compiled by the Bureau of Railway Economics, their No. O. S. Series B, and shows the situation by railroads for each of the first nine months of 1920, being all the data available at the time that was prepared. Exhibit 140, sheet 2, is a summary of the statistics for the same nine months, prepared from the reports of the Bureau of Railway Economics, O. S. Series B No. 9 and O. S. Series 2-3 and 5 of ‘the U. S. Railroad Administration, and shows the information for the Eastern district, tak- ing the totals as they appeared on the statements referred to. Then deducting from that the New England district, which figures are also shown separately, gives me the balance of the Eastern dis- trict; and then the Director General had certain of the lines in the Pocahontas district—not all of them, but some of them—under a separate Federal manager and they were shown separately, and 23 by adding those I get the total for the Eastern district. Then I have shown the information below for each of the New England lines. I am introducing this in connection with the question of per diem particularly. The freight car miles per day on the New York, New Haven & Hartford for the first nine months of 1920 averaged only 9.9 miles, as compared with 14.1 miles during the corresponding period of 1919. In no month of 1920 did the New Haven equal its best month’s performance of 1919, and in only three months did it equal its poorest performance of 1919, 7. ¢., 12.5 miles in Jan- uary, 1919. The tons per loaded car averaged 23.5 tons as against 23.2 tons last year. The net ton miles aggregated 2,228,042,000, as compared with 2,396,168,000 during the corresponding period of 1919. With the improved loading per car and the reduction in net ton miles, the New Haven could have handled the business of 1920 in approximately 32,000 cars if it had obtained a mileage equal to that of 1919. The average number of cars on the line was 46,486 in 1920 and 35,866 in 1919. Handling the traffic of 1920 with 32,000 cars would have effected a saving of about $14,000 per day in per diem charges for hire of freight cars, or about $5,000,000 per year. I offer as an exhibit a statement of embargoes either issued by the Boston & Maine against The Delaware and Hudson or issued by The Delaware and Hudson against the Boston & Maine, in the years 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919, and 1920; and accompanying that—I assume that probably they should be separate exhibits; there are two that I have mislaid and I will have to locate—I offer as an exhibit a similar statement prepared by the Central Railroad of New Jersey in connection with the traffic routed via the Central Railroad of New Jersey, the New York, New Haven & Hartford, the Central New England Railway and the Lehigh & New England Railroad for the years 1916 to 1920 both inclusive; also a statement prepared by the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western of embargoes in effect against traftic for points in New England account embargoes placed by the New York, New Haven & Hartford and Central New England during the year 1920; also statement prepared by the Long Island Railroad Company of cars held for the New Haven Railroad in the year 1920 under rule 15, which covers reclaims for per diem—in other words, on account of the inability of the New Haven to take the cars; also a statement prepared by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company of embargoes placed by the Pennsylvania Lines Hast of Pittsburgh and Erie, also placed by the U. S. Railroad Administration (Allegheny Region and Eastern Region) affecting shipments moving to and from New England via Wilkes-Barre, Harlem River, Campbell Hall and Maybrook gateways during the period 1916 to 1920 inclusive; a statement prepared by the New York Central Railroad and the Boston & Albany covering embargoes placed against the Boston & Albany; statement covering embargoes placed by the New Haven or placed by the New York Central against the New Haven during the period January 1, 1919, to October 22, 1920, affecting business via the New York Cen- tral and Boston & Albany; and a similar statement for the New York Central in connection with traffic moving via the Boston & Maine which was interchanged with it at Rotterdam Junction or Troy. I have coming down today similar statements which are set up in type and which the printer was unable to get out last night, from the Erie Railroad and the Lehigh Valley which will com- plete the situation as to the more important roads connecting with the New England lines. Shall those have separate exhibit numbers? Attorney Examiner Gerry: Are they all attached together, Mr. Williams? The Witness: No; they are not attached together. They could be given one number, though, as they all relate to one subject, and the New York Central is not in type. I have all the others in type, as a matter of convenience. Attorney Examiner Gerry: We will give it one number, consisting of five packages. The Witness: I have, you see, the New York Central here in this shape (indicating). Attorney Examiner Gerry: I see. The Witness: That would be six; and then there will be two that we will add, covering the other two lines, so as to make it complete. Attorney Examiner Gerry: Hight packages. The Witness: Then that will be Exhibit 141. (The statements referred to were thereupon received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 141, Nos. 1, 2, 8, 4, 5 and 6, Witness Williams’, and the same are forwarded herewith.) The Witness: Taking the first of those, relating to The Delaware and Hudson, it is an analysis of embargoes placed by the Boston & Maine Railroad against its connections, and embargoes placed by The Delaware and Hudson Company against the Boston & Maine and other lines, restricting traffic moving via the Boston & Maine. During 1920 there were 129 days during which The Delaware and Hudson had embargoes against traffic moving via the Boston & Maine, while there were 299 days on which the Boston & Maine had embargoes against its connections. Allowing for overlapping embargoes, it appears that there were 216 days on which restrictions were in effect against traffic moving via the Boston & Maine. The general manager of The Delaware and Hudson Company informs me that no record was kept of embargoes during the Federal control year of 1919. For the four years 1916, 1917, 1918 and 1920 The Delaware and Hudson had embargoes against traffic moving via the Boston & Maine aggre- gating 976 days, while the Boston & Maine had embargoes against traffic from its connections aggre- gating 785 days. After allowing for overlapping embargoes it appears that there were 929 days during the four years, or 63.59 per cent of the total number of days in the period, on which restric- tions were in effect against traffic moving via the Boston & Maine, an average of 232 days per year. This Exhibit 141, No. 1, shows the number of cars held during each day of each month and the places at which they were held on The Delaware and Hudson, also the number of cars held on the 25 connections of The Delaware and Hudson. During the year 1920, for example, cars were held to the extent of the number of car days which I will state. On Del. & Hud. On connections January _--------. — February ____-__-- 20,131 19,622 Mate ete oe eee 3,848 — April. 2-555 2s Jeu. 15,985 — May: soccer 61,159 34,695 SUNG 22 ese a 18,836 7,995 JULY toeeceseesecss 26,427 14,455 August __-________ 19,832 6,664 September ________ 280 — October _________- 705 — Totaliceaissse 167,203 88,431 Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry): That is all on page 26, is it, Mr. Williams? A. Of my statement here? Q. Yes, sir. A. The first summary I made comes on the first page there, and the other is on page 26; yes, sir. As you turn over the pages, 28, 29, and so forth, you will note it shows the yards on The Delaware and Hudson and The Delaware and Hudson connections in which cars were being held. The adverse effect upon these western connections of these unfavorable traffic conditions should not be underestimated. For example, during the month of July—that is not a winter month— cars were held for the Boston & Maine in twelve yards on that division of The Delaware and Hud- son Company on which Mechanicville, the point of interchange with the Boston & Maine, is located. In addition thereto, cars were held back on the Saratoga and Pennsylvania divisions as well as on the New York, Ontario & Western Railway, the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, the Lehigh Valley, the Erie Railroad and the Pennsylvania Railroad. The originating lines, in addi- tion to furnishing the cars, were denied their use far beyond the time reasonably required for handling the traffic. Attorney Examiner Gerry: We will take a recess now until 2 o’clock. (Thereupon, at 12:45 o’clock p. m., a recess was taken until 2 0’clock p. m.) AFTER RECESS. The hearing was resumed at 2 o’clock p. m., pursuant to the taking of recess. Attorney Examiner Gerry: You may proceed, Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams: Thank you. The Witness: I have found those three exhibits among our papers. They were here, but just misplaced momentarily. 26 The first which I would like to offer is a statement showing tidewater and all rail coal consumed by each of the New England roads for the years 1920, 1914, 1918 and 1912. The data was fur- nished by Mr. Brigham. I said this morning, “Mr. Pearson.” I see that it is Mr. Brigham. That is for the seven complainant lines. I would suggest that that be Exhibit No. 137, sheet 2. It all relates to the general subject. (The statement referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 137, Sheet 2, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: In the analysis of Exhibit 187 we showed an analysis of the tidewater tonnage, and this Exhibit 137, Sheet 2, indicates that there is a very substantial reduction, apparently, in the fuel coal that is received by water and would ina very large measure account for the fluctuating tonnage moving into New England by water, as shown on Exhibit 137, Sheet 1, that statement in- cluding both railroad and commercial coal. Then I have located the analysis of embargoes by the Erie Railroad Company, showing the restrictions in effect against traffic for points in New England routed via the Erie Railroad and the New York, New Haven & Hartford during the years 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919 and 1920, and the statement furnished by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company of cars held for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad during the years 1916 to 1920, both inclusive, on which reclaim was presented. This is a part of Exhibit 141. (The data above referred to will be found attached to Defendants’ Exhibit No. 141, Witness Williams, forwarded herewith.) The Witness: I offer as an exhibit what is called a tentative statement of cost of freight car ownership for per diem purposes, that indicating the results of a study made by the Railway Ex- ecutives to whom the matter was referred, and it was used by them in recommending the per diem rate of $1.00 per car. That will be exhibit No. 142. (The matter referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 142, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: This Exhibit 142 shows, in connection with the adoption of the current per diem rate of $1.00 per car, the estimates of cost of owning cars, which led to its adoption. ‘The esti- mate on the basis of new cars will be seen to be $1.54 per day. It is noteworthy that all New Eng- land lines except Boston & Maine and Maine Central voted for the present per diem rate; that in- formation being furnished me by the General Secretary of the American Railway Association. The computations on which it was based make no allowance for losses due to idleness of cars when the traffic movement is not sufficient for the employment of all freight car equipment. I should like to say, in connection with the suggestion about the relation of per diem to divisions of a rate, that the per diem charge is fixed primarily to recompense the owner of the car for his investment, for the repairs to his car and for depreciation. If you pay the owner of the car the rental for the car and then, with the other hand, you take that money away from him through a change in the division of the through rate, you leave him nothing for the use of his car. 27 Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry): Do you mean to say, by that, that you do not think the per diem should be considered as one of the expenses which should be taken into consideration in determining divisions? A. Absolutely not. All that you do is to pay the owner of that car a rental, or a return on his investment figured at six per cent. You pay him simply a rental for his car and enough to take care of his repairs to and the depreciation of the car. If you take any of that back through a change in divisions, the owner of that car is not going to be paid for his investment, and he is not going to make any further investments of that kind. Now, this per diem rate, as will be noted, does not fully recompense the owner. If you go back over the records 1906 to date—and we have reasonable records for that period—we find many years in which there were large surpluses of cars. There are large surplusages of cars today. The owners of those cars are finding the cars coming home on their lines. They are not earning any per diem; they are not earning anything in the way of rental. So that to the extent to which the per diem charge fails to take care of a condition of that kind the owner is the loser. Now, where the owner in a measure helps himself, or hopes to help himself, why he buys cars is that the earnings of freight cars average about $2,000 per year. In other words, take the total revenue of the Class 1 roads and add to that 30 per cent, assum- ing that is the average increase for the country on this rate advance, and that would give $1,926 per car as the average earnings per car, just on class one roads only. So, when you take into con- sideration all the cars, it would probably be in excess of that. That, however, does not make an allowance for the private car line car which, of course, would also be earning some revenue; and I should say that somewhere between $1,800 and $2,000 would be about what the average freight car earns. I did, when Assistant to the General Manager of the Baltimore & Ohio, and afterwards, when Superintendent of Freight Transportation of the Frisco, work it out on the basis of various classes of equipment, and it showed that the box cars were the best earners of any of the classes of equip- ment per year, and next to that came the open-top, and the car that earned us least was the flat car. Back at that time, about 1903 and 1904, an open-top car earned us about $800 per year, and a closed car earned us about $1,200 per year. With the changes that have taken place since, I should say that $1,800, or in there some place, was a close enough approximation, at least, to illustrate the point. Now, I have illustrated with The Delaware and Hudson, that being the first statement that was prepared at my request. Then that was forwarded out, with the suggestion that the other people prepare it along somewhat the same lines, so as to simplify the analysis of these exhibits. When we come to analyze the other exhibits, we find pretty much the same situation. There is relatively little difference in the situation, for instance, at Mechanicville, as indicated by the re- ports of the New York Central and those of The Delaware and Hudson; and to a large extent you find a similarity existing when you come to analyze the interchange points with the New Haven. Take, for example, the New York Central, and we find on the last day of March, or through the month of March, cars being held at 37 different points on the New York Central. Inasmuch 28 as the exhibit shows the points and the number of cars at each place, I won’t take the time to set them out in the record. Now, in connection with the New Haven situation taking the Jersey Central as an illustration, in the five years 1916 to 1920, account of New Haven embargoes and Central New England em- bargoes, the total number of days cars were held was 1,232; account of the Jersey Central em- bargoes against those lines, the number of days cars were held was 142, and account of the Lehigh & New England embargoes, the number of days cars were held was 18. That made a total of 1,392 days; loss account overlapping embargoes, 269 days, or a grand total of days restricted during the 5-year period of 1,123 days. Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry): Are you talking about days all the time? A. These are days through the years on which the embargoes were in effect on part or all of the traffic. A statement of the character of the embargo in effect and the length of time it was in effect is set forth in detail through the exhibit. This shows a grand total of days restricted during the 5- year period of 1,123 days, or on an average of 224 2-5 days per year. And in 1919 the low number shown there is explained on account of the fact that during the operations of the Director General reclaims were not made for per diem during a part of the time. I assume that those illustrations will be sufficient, as the other exhibits speak for themselves. As I said, that indicates the situation as to the different gateways. Now, during this period, according to Mr. Pearson’s annual report, they had an abnormal sit- uation growing out of the war. As to 1920, itis my recollection of a statement made to me by Mr. Pearson—or, rather, made to the Eastern Presidents by Mr. Pearson—that they were in pretty good shape until the outlaw railroad strike made it impossible for the lines west of the river to take traffic from the New England lines. That caused some freight to back up there, and then, when the strike was over and the traffic began to move eastbound again, there was a congestion which unduly embarrassed them during the year; and I am only pointing out the fact that this must be an exceptional situation which has confronted them to produce these very extreme results, which we would not duplicate in other sections of the country. Now, as stated, the average earnings per freight car or the per diem rate does not recompense the owners for these unnecessary delays. Furthermore, the large number of cars held by The Delaware and Hudson Company, the Central Railroad of New Jersey, the Erie and other western railroads connecting with the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, Central of New Eng- land, or the Boston & Maine, in the various yards of these western connecting lines, seriously em- barrassed their operations and materially added to their operating costs. No allowance was made by the New Haven or the Boston & Maine for these heavy additional expenses which they forced upon their connecting carriers. It is particularly unfortunate that such serious delays as these should have occurred when there was imperative need for more cars to handle traffic that awaited shipment from many points in the United States. 29 It is to be noted that the average number of miles traveled per freight car per day on the Boston & Maine was 16 miles during the nine months of 1920 and on the Boston & Albany 26.6 miles. During the corresponding nine months of 1919 cars averaged 17.5 miles per day on the Bos- ton & Maine and 31.9 miles per day on the Boston & Albany. In view of the fact that the average length of haul is approximately the same on these roads, it should be possible for the Boston & Maine more nearly to approximate the daily movement obtained by the Boston & Albany. An improvement of ten miles per car per day by the former would effect a saving of approximately 14,000 cars per day, or $14,000 per day in per diem charges, an annual saving of over $5,000,000. An analysis of the exhibits will indicate that in most months in which the Boston & Maine had the maximum number of cars on the line it had lower average miles per car per day than in the months when a lesser number of cars were on the line, indicating that the reduction in mileage was due to too many cars on the line; rather than to an insufficient number of cars to make up trains at the various engine terminals. According to the annual reports of the Boston & Maine, that Company owned 20,962 revenue freight cars as of December 31, 1919, and 26,341 cars as of December 81, 1911, a decrease of 5,379 cars. This reduction in the number of cars owned involves an annual charge of about $1,963,335 for per diem. J have already indicated that it is cheaper, on the average, for a road to pay per diem than to own the cars, if you take in the good years and bad years, and assuming that you can get enough of the other roads’ cars to handle your traffic and with the large volume of traffic going into New England being in excess of the quantity moving westbound, they are always in position to handle their business and take care of their shippers with the cars of other companies, even though they fail to maintain their own equipment. Mr. Slater, in answer to inquiry, stated that the average number of cars on the New Haven and Central New England, ranges from 40,000 to 45,000 per day, of which 11,500 to 13,000 are con- stantly being loaded or unloaded. He asserted that, in other words, approximately 30% of the total cars on the system are constantly on tracks where traffic originates or to which it is destined. He stated that nothing more clearly indicates the terminal nature of the railroads than the fact that at all times almost one car in three is in process of being loaded or unloaded (Record, pp. 150 and 151.) From these statements it appears that the cars are in the hands of shippers and consignees ap- proximately 7.2 hours out of each 24. Assuming 6% of cars to be on repair tracks, 1.44 hours of each 24 would be so occupied. This would leave 15.86 hours during which the cars would be in the hands of the transportation department for handling in yards and movement on the road. My Exhibit No. 135, compiled from O.S 1 and 3 reports of the Director General, January to December, 1919, inclusive, shows that the average freight train speed on the New Haven was in excess of 10 miles per hour. It would appear, therefore, that the freight cars on this line were engaged in road movement between terminals not over one hour out of each 24, although they were available for such movement during 15.36 hours out of each 24. 30 Of course, during that 15.36 hours they also would have to handle them through their yards. By dividing the average number of miles per hour made by the trains west of New England into the average number of miles per day made by the cars, you get approximately the time that those cars were in motion between terminals west of New England. Of course, that would include the time in passing tracks or anything like that. It would indicate that they are in motion between terminals west of New England between 21% and 3 hours. Such study as we have been able to make of the situation does not indicate that the fact that they have the cars in the hands of the shippers or consignees 30 per cent of the time, as claimed by the New England lines, is materially different than the situation west of New England. If there is greater terminal delay in the actual loading and unloading of cars in the New Eng- land States than west of New England, the remedy would appear to be in a revision of demurrage rates rather than in assessing other lines to offset losses due to the improper use of cars by the ship- pers of New England. Attention is called to the relatively light lading of the cars and trains on the New England lines. The average freight load per loaded car is only 22.28 tons as compared with 30.47 tons for all other lines embraced in the Eastern rate group. There has been no evidence to indicate that the New England lines are securing the maximum practicable loading of their cars. The New England lines own 2,915 locomotives with an aggregate tractive power of 81,019,675 pounds, as compared with 28,242 locomotives, with an aggregate tractive power of 977,287,998 pounds, owned by the other lines embraced in the Eastern rate group. In other words, the average tractive power of the motive power of the New England lines is approximately 27,000 pounds, while that of the other roads in the Eastern group averages about 34,600 pounds. Now, those figures are not altogether fairly comparable. At best, they could only be used as an aid to judgment, in that the statistical information at our disposal does not separate the average tractive power of locomotives in freight service, those in yard service and those in passenger service. The average tractive power of those in road freight service would be the greater. Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry): The tractive power would have to be weighted to show its true comparison? A. Yes, sir, it would have to be; but it only points out the likelihood that their engines can haul less. If you analyze the Director General’s report showing the gross tonnage which their engines can haul and divide that by the percentage of the gross tonnage rating which they say they were able to obtain, it indicates that the hauling capacity of their locomotives in New England was substan- tially less than the hauling capacity of the locomotives west of New England. The lighter loading of cars, whether attributable to the use of cars of smaller capacity or failure of the shippers properly to load the cars furnished, materially increases the percentage of dead 31 weight to the paying load, and this, together with the lighter motive power necessarily reduces the revenue tonnage per train and correspondingly increases the cost of operation. As an illustration of the effect of the average loading on the cost of operation, I would state that the present average capacity of the freight cars of the country is 41 tons. In 1918, they were loaded to 65.56 per cent of capacity. In other words, they contained 26.88 tons. In the pre-war period they were loaded to 54 per cent of capacity, equated for the difference in carrying capacity of all cars in the country, which would be on the basis of 21.39 tons per car. A locomotive having a capacity of 4,000 adjusted tons on a 8 per cent grade line would haul 65 cars containing 26.88 tons each, while it would haul 72 cars containing 21.39 tons each; but the aggregate tonnage contained in the 72 cars would be 207 tons less than the aggregate tonnage con- tained in the 65 cars. Therefore, if the cars be loaded with only 21.39 tons, it would require 13.5 per cent more road freight engines, freight trains and freight crews and fuel, and 11 per cent more cars. The additional trains and cars will require additional track. THIRD {S THE RATE STRUCTURE OF THE NEW ENGLAND LINES, INCLUDING BOTH PASSENGER AND FREIGHT RATES, SUCH THAT THEY DERIVE REASONABLE REVENUE FROM TRAFFIC LOCAL TO NEW ENGLAND AND FROM THAT INTERCHANGED WITH CARRIERS OTHER THAN THOSE IN THE EASTERN RATE GROUP? Attention is called to a statement made by a former member of the Interstate Commerce Com- mission in an address on November 29, 1920, which is of historical value in considering the rate structure of the New England lines. He said: “There has been no adequate and intelligent study of our New England freight rate structure for a generation. It is a haphazard congeries of accidents, guess-work and tradi- tions. We who have had official responsibilities have been utterly unable to induce the railroad executives to give it proper attention. About seven years ago, when Mr. Prouty was on the Interstate Commerce Commission and I was on the Massachusetts Commission, we raised rates, and told the New England executives that they ought to make a careful study of their rate structure. They did not do it. Three years ago, as an Interstate Com- merce Commissioner, I heard another case and again we raised rates in New England and again besought the railroad men to make a careful study of their freight rate structure. It was then clear that no one knew what ought to be known for an intelligent dealing with that difficult and intricate problem. This advice was practically disregarded, at least until very recently. Responsibility resting upon the New England executives for their non-attention, or at any rate, belated attention, to this fundamentally important matter, is very heavy.” 32 I offer as an exhibit a statement prepared from the data contained in the 13th Census, 1910, of the United States, Volume 8, page 57, which shows the population in various states and in various groups. (The statement referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 148, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: That does show what you were asking, Mr. Examiner, and the land area, the population per square mile, and, as to manufacturing establishments, the number of industries re- ported, number of establishments, wage earners (average number), the value of products, the value added by manufacture, and then, per capita of total population, the value of products, the value added by manufacture, and the ratio of average number of wage earners to the total popula- tion, in per cent. Q. (By Attorney Examiner Gerry): It does not show, however, the capitalization of the industries, per mile of line? A. Oh, no; it does not show that. We might try to work that out. From this statement it appears that as to the New England States: Valieof produttsi2s22c 20 ecco 3ecee Coste oes emo $2,670,065,114 Value added by manufacture. ee eee 1,193,768,236 New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michi- gan, Delaware, Maryland, District of Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia (being approximately the balance of the Eastern Rate Group) Valite-Of products... os... ee a ee ee $12,538,699,217 Value added by manufacture______________--_.______-__-____ 5,232,392,161 It is my understanding that the larger figure contains the smaller. For the Constructed Year ended October 31,1919 (Hx Parte 74), the Freight and Switching revenues were shown as follows: Freight and Per cent of switching revenues value of products New England carriers____________-____-__-_____ $140,568,424 5.26 All other carriers in the Eastern district__________ 1,679,281,825 13.39 In the New England States the value of products per capita of population was $408 and the value added by manufacture, per capita, was $182—each being greater than the respective averages for any of the other groups, and nearly twice the average for the United States. From this it would appear that the probabilities are that the value of the products produced by the various manufacturing establishments in New England per ton of traffic produced is greater than the value of the products produced west of New England. I do not regard this statement as conclusive. I only offer it for what it may be worth. 33 There have been numerous meetings and certain changes in rates have been agreed upon by representatives of the New England lines and the lines west of New England, which changes ought to be made in order to bring the New England rates affected more into line with the general rate schedule. Numerous other changes in New England tariffs have been suggested by the traffic rep- resentatives of the Trunk Lines which, as yet, have not been accepted by the New England lines. It appears that there is opportunity for the New England lines materially to benefit themselves by revisions of rates in their own territory. Other witnesses will go into this subject more in detail, that being a traffic matter. FOURTH ARE THE LINES CONSTITUTING THE BALANCE OF THE EASTERN RATE GROUP, CONSIDERED IN COM- BINATION BUT EXCLUDING THE NEW ENGLAND LINES, OBTAINING $25,000,000, OR ANY COMPAR- ABLE SUM, More THAN THE SIX PER CENT RETURN INTENDED BY THE COMMISSION; ARE THEY So SITUATED THAT $25,000,000 ANNUALLY COULD REASONABLY BE TAKEN FROM THEM; AND ARE THE NEW ENGLAND LINES ACTUALLY RECEIVING ABoUT $25,000,000 LEss THAN THEY WOULD Hap THEY BEEN MADE A SEPARATE GROUP? Mr. Brigham’s Exhibit No. 14 shows an estimate of 34,099,720 tons of freight interchanged by New England lines with Canadian lines and Trunk Lines, the total freight revenue therefrom amounting to $191,505,655, divided as follows: Through Revenue Amount Per cent New: Bniglanid:. niga ot oer a a el ae $67,272,648 85.1 Un MOS" 55s Sse ie Ss a OS Seas 68,485,946 85.7 Central Freight Ass’n lines__________---------_-_-_-------_- 18,319,857 9.6 Lines outside Eastern Rate group (including Canadian lines)_ 387,427,204 19.6 DIS OPA caper nth Oh SO Ot A CF ahaa $191,505,655 100.0 The statement furnished by Mr. Brigham to the Joint Accounting Committee, showing ton- nage interchanged and revenue thereon for a constructive year, and based on an analysis of revenue for six alternate months, September, 1918, to October, 1919, inclusive, shows that the Canadian lines handled approximately 10.8% of all traffic interchanged by the New England lines with their connections, and that the Canadian lines and their connections received about 13.5% of all revenue therefrom accruing to the lines outside of New England. Therefore, the $37,427,204 shown above would divide— $25,873,263 revenue to Canadian roads and their connections. $11,553,941 revenue to American roads. 34 The following statement of freight traffic moved to and from New England points separated by territories of origin and destination, is taken from Brigham Exhibit No. 14: Territories, received and Percentage of forwarded combined Tons: total tonnage: NPN nie. 3S OS ee on cee ee sa ado eae 20,748,182 61. Central Freight Association._.__________________________ 9,262,487 27. GREW Saeaeieee DT eo oe We coe a 1,255,253 3.7 CRAGIN atric ccomeemseco ee 5 aaa eT 1,028,381 3. RON UMM 2 aia plgiepea nh sai ey. So ee eS 930,478 2.8 dY¥anscontinental): ooo. csceses ens Ss eee ao ge 875,039 2.5 TOTAL RECEIVED AND FORWARDED____________________ 34,099,720 100. (Note) :—Figures are based on actual movement for month of October, 1919, equated to yearly totals. That is a little different from the totals previously read, The New England lines are asking that they be given $25,000,000 annually in excess of the amount to which they are entitled on the basis of existing divisions, this amount to be diverted to them by the application of tonnage arbitraries. Were 40% to be added to the freight revenue and the $25,000,000 pro rated on the basis of tonnage percentages shown in Brigham Exhibit No. 14, the total revenue accruing to the carriers in each group as shown in Exhibit No. 14 would be changed to the following: Total revenueif Per cent increase asked total Roads Revenue is applied revenue New England lines___________-_ $94,181,707 + $25,000,000 = $119,181,707 44.45 Per cent of present basis______ 126.54 Drunk lines s-2 Sane pee 95,881,324 — 61% of $25,000,000 or $15,250,000 — 80,631,324 30.07 Per cent of present basis______ 84.09 Central Freight Association lines 25,647,800 — 27% of $25,000,000 or $ 6,750,000 = 18,897,800 7.05 Per cent of present basis______ 73.68 All other rate groups (including ‘ Canadian lines) __._______ 52,398,086 — 12% of $25,000,000 or $ 3,000,000 = 49,898,086 18.48 Per cent of present basis______ 94.27 TOTAE: G2eche oe oe $268,108,917 $25,000,000 $268,108,917 100.00 However, the New England lines claim that it is the carriers in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territories which have received $25,000,000 more than the amount that would accrue to them at the rate of six per cent. and should this $25,060,000 be deducted from their revenues from 35 interchange traffic, the revenue figures in Mr. Brigham’s Exhibit No. 14 (plus 40% increase) would be modified to the following: Per cent Revenue as of total Roads Revenue Changes revised revenue New England lines___________ $94,181,707 + $25,000,000 $119,181,707 44.45 Per cent of present basis__ 126.54 Trunk lines ______~_--_-_- Le 95,881,324 — 17,285,000 78,596,324 29.32 Per cent of present basis__ 81.98 Central Freight Assn. lines____ 25,647,800 = 7,715,000 17,932,800 6.69 Per cent of present basis__ 69.90 All other rate groups (including Canadian lines) _~_______ 52,398,086 No change 52,398,086 19.54 "EOUVAT,) Sakon hers ioag ne One $268,108,917 $25,000,000 $268,108,917 100.00 Inasmuch as the tonnage and revenue shown for lines outside of the New England group em- brace traffic moving to all points in the United States, the service performed, as measured by the average length of haul or in any other way, must necessarily be greater than that of the New England lines, so that when consideration be given to that factor, the disproportionate results of allowing the Trunk Lines only $78,596,324, as against $119,181,707 to the New England lines would be much greater than indicated by the comparison of the revenues. Q. (By Mr. Newcomb) : That would be that, for handling the same traffic, the western lines would receive $78,000,000 and the New England lines $119,000,000? A. That is the same traffic in so far as the trunk lines—No; that would also include the traffic moving via the Canadian lines. We were unable, from the figures, to make a complete separ- ation just as to the traffic moving through the Central Trunk Line territory. The figures as shown here are, as I understand, the figures presented by Mr. Brigham in his Exhibit No. 6. All the traffic going into Trunk Line territory shown in that table would represent the direct interchange. The Central Freight Association and Southern traffic would come through here. When it comes to the Canadian traffic, apparently, from the second table I read, only 3 per cent of the total tonnage originates in or is destined to Canada, notwithstanding the fact that there is 10.8 per cent of the traffic interchanged with the Canadian lines, indicating that about 10 per cent of the total interchange traffic moves over the Canadian lines into or out of New England and then into or out of the United States, and we cannot quite work that out to show the full com- parison there. There would have to be some equation of those figures. From some of the testimony offered by Mr. Brigham on behalf of the New England lines (Brigham Exhibit No. 6), it would appear that the New England lines claim that at the time the application for the increase in rates was made the lines in Central Freight Association territory and the Pocahontas lines were in need of a smaller percentage of additional revenue than the other 36 lines in the Eastern Rate District. Mr. Campbell referred (Record p. 1169) to a statement that the Pocahontas lines would earn about $19,000,000 in excess of 6% on their aggregate cost of property devoted to public use. The fact that the Pocahontas lines haul a relatively small amount of traffic other than bitu- minous coal, and that the production of bituminous mines during the past five years has been abnormal, owing to conditions resulting from the war, should not be overlooked. The abnormal export demand and the change in the distribution required by the United States Fuel Administra- tion have been of substantial temporary advantage to those lines. I should like to offer as an exhibit a statement furnished at my request by the Pocahontas lines, showing the net railway operating income separately for the months of September, October, November and December, 1920; December, being partially estimated, and showing the relation of that to their property investment account. (The statement referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 144, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: It is to be noted that there has been a substantial decrease in earnings and in net railway operating income in November as compared with the two preceding months, and that December shows a further substantial reduction in net railway operating income. Q. (By Mr. Newcomb) Will you state the amount of that reduction, Mr. Williams? A. The total for the four Pocahontas roads is as follows: DCPLEIMMDCE sr eras Bau aed see) $4,646,527 October. 2s 4a ees eee eee 4,869,658 November _____-__------_----------- 3,286,852 Décember 23 ee 2,789,283 or at the rate of 6.36 per cent, notwithstanding the fact that at the time the figures for the con- structive year were furnished it was estimated that these lines might earn a figure somewhere approximating that stated by Mr. Campbell. My Exhibit No. 138, showing the coal production of the country 1910 to 1920 indicates that the production during the year 1920 was approximately 50,000,000 tons in excess of the average of the preceding five years and approximately 121,000,000 tons greater than the average of the five years immediately preceding the war. It shows an increase of about 98,000,000 tons over the year 1919. In view of the tremendous slowing down of industries and the large production of coal last year, which was the second largest in the history of the country, a substantial decrease in the output of the mines may be reasonably expected. Such a decline in coal production is certain adversely to affect the Pocahontas lines. If, as claimed by the New England lines, under the operation of the schedules provided for by the Commission in Ex Parte 74 the New England lines should receive approximately $25,000,000 less than six per cent. upon their combined investment in property and if, on the other hand, the 37 Pocahontas lines should receive approximately $19,000,000 more than the amount thus indicated, it would follow that the lines in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territory, excluding the Pocahontas and New England lines, would receive approximately $6,000,000 in excess of six per cent. This illustration indicates the situation or the status as between the lines handling inter- change traffic with the New England lines or handling traffic to and from New England states and those lines in the Central Freight Association and Trunk Line territory, which, while located to- gether geographically, have no interchange business with the New England lines covered by through rates. Mr. Hildum has discussed Mr. Brigham’s exhibit No. 6, sheets 3 and 4. In Brigham Exhibit No. 6, the Erie Railroad and the Baltimore & Ohio were shown in the Trunk Line group only, no part of their operations being reflected in the Central Freight Associa- tion statement, notwithstanding the fact that about 40% of the Erie mileage and about 65% of the Baltimore & Ohio mileage is in the latter territory. All the New York Central Railroad was in- cluded in the Trunk Line Statement while all of the subsidiary lines were included in the Central Freight Association Territory. These arbitrary arrangements controlled the comparative showing as between these regions. Transferring the Baltimore & Ohio and the Erie to the Central Freight Association group would entirely alter the result and it would then appear that the Central Freight Association lines needed 29.013%, instead of 24.431% and that the Trunk Lines needed 27.072%, instead of 29.767%. Were all Central Freight Association lines to be included in Mr. Brigham’s Exhibit, there would be some further changes in the percentages. In view of the effect of transferring these lines merely from one statement to another, where it is impossible to segregate their earnings, it indicates that there is no violence done to the Trunk lines or the lines in the Central Freight Association group by the consolidation of all those lines into one rate group. Mr. Hildum’s Exhibit No. 126 shows the property investment as well as the total operating revenues of the carriers in the Eastern rate group for the constructed year ended October 31, 1919, and the effect on these revenues of changes in passenger and freight tariffs suggested in the orig- inal and supplemental applications of the carriers in Ex Parte 74. These estimated results, however, were dependent upon the maintenance of the volume of business shown for the constructed year, upon the continuance of the operating revenues then received from the Pullman Company and the then basis of costs for labor, materials and supplies, etc. (See Shriver statement accompanying Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3, page 4, Ex Parte 74). They did not reflect the loss of earnings resulting from the new contract with the American Railway Express Company which became effective as of September 1, 1920. Mr. Hildum’s Exhibit 126 indicates that over and above a 20 per cent increase in all pas- senger fares, excess baggage and 39.75 per cent in milk and a surcharge of 50 per cent on all Pull- man Fares, the carriers estimated they would require 39.75 per cent increase in all freight and switching revenues to enable them to earn 6 per cent upon their aggregate investment in property devoted to public use. 38 The New England carriers represent that, had they not been included in the Eastern rate group, the applications of the other carriers, instead of showing a necessary increase of 39.7 per cent in freight and switching revenues, would have shown only 38.41 per cent (that is Brigham Exhibit No. 7), a reduction of 1.59 per cent below the full 40 per cent, and amounting to $25,- 666,236 per annum (page 47 of the record.) The New England carriers claim they are, therefore, entitled to receive approximately $25,000,000 per annum from the other carriers in the Eastern rate group. I have not attempted to go into the correctness of Mr. Brigham’s Exhibits Nos. 6 and 7. I should like to comment, however, on the fact that, while the carriers showed they needed 39.75 per cent as the case was finally closed, I think that Mr. Brigham, instead of making his comparison with the 39.75 per cent, makes the deduction between what was shown as needed and the full 40 per cent. To the extent that any fractional amount was given to the carriers, I assume that the Commission had in mind that that was to cover contingencies. Attention is called to the fact that the New England carriers base their claim upon the esti- mates contained in the exhibits accompanying the applications of the carriers in Ex Parte 74, and not upon the award of the Commission, nor do they give consideration to substantial changes which have taken place since the application was filed or the award made. Their argument, however, is based upon conditions existing when their complaint was entered. It is necessary, therefore, that some analysis should be made of the estimates submitted by the carriers in Ex Parte 74 and of the results obtained by the carriers under the decision of the Com- mission, Volume of Traffic: Although the aggregate revenue tons moved one mile during the year 1920, probably when ascertained, will approximate the previous high record of 1918, the last three months have indicated a reduction of 12% to 15% in the volume of freight traffic in the Eastern Rate District, below the corresponding period of 1919. There has been also a substantial reduction in pas- senger traffic and further decreases seem probable. The New England carriers have called attention to the falling off in traffic in New England in October with a “real falling off in November” (Record 35). The carriers in Trunk Line and Central Freight Association territory have suffered equal or greater losses in traffic due to the general depression in industry. Automobile plants are operating at not over 25% of capacity; there is a corresponding reduction in output at the rubber factories and other establishments affiliated with the automobile trade. Many of the iron furnaces have been shut down; the output of the iron and steel mills has been heavily curtailed; the tin plate plants are closed; and, in fact, all lines of industry except coal mines show reduced output. I will say that since preparing this I have noted, by the weekly reports of the Geological Sur- vey, an indication of the falling off of about 1,000,000 tons per day in the production of bituminous coal mines. An article appeared in the New York Evening World of January 26, 1921, from which the following statement has been prepared. I think possibly I had better just read it. It relates to an analysis made by the Department of Labor Employment Service. It says: “The Employment Service’s figures represented a reduction of 36.9 per cent in the number of workers employed in industries as compared with January a year ago. 39 “Michigan led the States in proportional reduction with 82 per cent and Ohio and Indiana follow with a reduction in employment of 50 per cent each. Next came Illinois with 44 per cent, Connecticut with 43 per cent, Massachusetts with 38 per cent, Wisconsin, 32 per cent, New York, 28 per cent, and New Jersey, 22 per cent. “The largest percentage of reduction in specific industries, 69 per cent, occurred in the auto- mobile and accessory industry. “Second in rank in the reduction of employees were the building trades, with approximately 58 per cent. “A reduction of 35.5 per cent was noted in the textile and related industries; 35 per cent in leather and its products and 32 per cent in lumber and house furniture. The reduction in metals and products, machinery, electrical goods and foundry products was 30.5 per cent; in packing and food products 19 per cent, and in clay, glass, cement and stone products 19 per cent. “Numerically the greatest reduction was in New York City, where 234,243 were reported discharged. Chicago had a reduction of 86,000; Philadelphia, 76,000; Detroit, 160,000; Cleveland, 84,000; Boston, 25,000; Newark, 47,000; Cincinnati, 24,000; Milwaukee, 24,320; St. Louis, 49,250; Baltimore, 30,565; Kansas City, 20,640; Pittsburgh, 12,500; San Francisco, 13,000; Portland, Ore., 20,000; New Bedford, 30,000; Fall River, 25,000; Manchester, N. H., 21,000; Bridgeport, 20,000; Worcester, 10,000; Lawrence, 14,500; Lynn, 12,000; Providence, 17,500; Lowell, 11,000; New Haven, 10,000; Haverhill, 7,800; Springfield, 7,200; Paterson, 20,000; Rochester, 18,000; Scranton, 18,000; Jersey City, 15,000; Passaic, 12,000; Syracuse, 10,000; Reading, 7,000; Troy, 8,000; Utica, 8,000; Schenectady, 7,000; Trenton, 6,500; Camden, 3,000. “The total reduction in the Southern States, including Kentucky, was only about 100,000. “The unemployed in Wilmington, Del., was placed at 9,026 and in Washington, D. C., 8,612.” The total reduction in the Southern states, including Kentucky, was only about 100,000. The statement says that the director’s figures show the number of unemployed in the country as 3,- 493,466. From those figures it indicates that the amount of unemployment is greater west of New England than in New England. There will be a further loss to the Eastern railways over and above the reduction from the slackening of industry, due to the diversion of freight on account of the difference in the percentage of increase in freight rates authorized for the several rate districts, thereby changing differentials formerly existing. For example, the Gulf ports formerly enjoyed a differential of 5 cents per 100 lbs. as against Atlantic ports, on export grain traffic, while under the new rate schedule this differ- ential has been increased to 14c per 100 Ibs. due to the difference in the percentage of rate advance in the two rate groups. Therefore, unless the rates to Gulf ports are increased the lines in the Eastern Rate District will have to reduce their rates to Atlantic ports, thus reducing their freight revenues below the authorized rates, or suffer a substantial loss of revenue through diversion of grain to the Gulf ports. The copper producers have arranged to divert practically all their Atlantic seaboard traffic from the all rail routes to the rail and water routes, thus further reducing the revenues of the carriers in the Eastern Rate District. The interterritorial rate ad- vance of 831/3% applies to coal from the Kentucky coal fields to points in the Eastern Rate Dis- 40 trict, while an advance of 40% was made on coal produced by mines located in the Eastern Rate Dis- trict and destined to points within said district, thus materially changing the differentials formerly existing. Unless corrected there will be a substantial diversion, and on the tonnage thus affected the lines within the Eastern Group will receive but 331/3% increase. Presumably similar diversions of other traffic will occur but it is too early to forecast the full effect of these changes. The carriers other than the New England carriers in Eastern Rate District will not earn $25,000,000, or any other sum, increased by 6% upon their investment in property devoted to public use but will actually earn much less than 6%. The Commission in its decision in Ex Parte 74 did not grant the full increases in freight, passenger, switching and other revenues requested by the carriers. (a) There was no change in the minimum carload charge, minimum class scale, nor in the minimum charge per shipment. (b) Interterritorial freight rates (i. e., rates between points in the Eastern Rate District and any points in other rate districts) were increased only 33 1/3%. The difference between 33 1/3% and 40% applied to the traffic affected is estimated to cause a substantial loss in the freight revenues of the carriers in the Eastern Rate District, of which only a small portion will be lost to the New England carriers. On the traffic that is interchanged by the New England lines with their connections, only a small part goes beyond the eastern rate group, while to the Trunk Lines, and more particularly the C. F. A. lines, they have a very heavy volume of traffic that is affected by reason of the large inter- change with the other rate districts. The following statement shows increases in rates obtained by lines in Eastern Territory, under Ex Parte 74: BETWEEN C.F. A. Tilinois Trunk Line (Except Freight AND New and I, F.C. Committee England Pocahontas Territory) Territory Southern Territory (Note 1)--_--------------- 3314% 331 % 8314% 3314% Southwestern Territory ___._____-------------- +40 +40 3314 35 Western Trunk Line Territory__.______-_-------- 40 40 40 85 Northwest Territory _------------------------ ae oe 3314 #3314 35 Inter-Mountain and Pacific Coast Territory_-__-_ | Weio \ 3314 3314 3314 Illinois Freight Committee Territory____-_-____ 40 40 40 40 : E.B.3714 G:F. A. Tétrnitory 2.26 Sss2casscccesseccoce W.B.40 40 40 40 Note 1—Small volume of traffic to and from Southern Territory governed by sums of local rates on which car- riers in Eastern Group received 40% increase. +On a few commodities north bound, 334% increase. *On bituminous coal from Indiana mines to Northwest, also to Missouri, on through rated traffic 35% increase. tExcept from Boston, and also Portland, Brunswick and Lewiston on traffic moving via Boston. Explanatory Note—In the case of the Illinois Central north of Cairo, which is in the Eastern Rate Group, in addition to the traffic to and from points on that road north of Cairo included in the table on which the Illinois Cen- tral would get less than 40%, it also includes all traffic between points north of Cairo and all of Western Trunk Line Territory, except traffic in what is known ag Illinois Freight Committee territory. In the case of the Wabash R. R., in addition to the traffic shown in the table, it includes all traffic to and from points on that road in Illinois, Missouri and Iowa, to and from all of Western Trunk Line territory, except what is known as Illinois Freight Committee territory. (That will be commented on more by Mr. Maxwell at a later time.) 41 (c) The application to the Commission, and presumably the decision of the Commis- sion, were based upon the contracts then in effect with the American Railway Express Company and with the Pullman Company. The contract with the Express Company ex- pired with the termination of the Guaranty Period, i. e., on August 31, 1920, and a new contract became effective as of September 1, 1920. On the basis of information obtained from the Express Company officers it is estimated that the receipts of the carriers in the Eastern Rate Group from express will be approximately $32,000,000 per annum less than the amount shown in the constructed year in Ex Parte 74— and this means a reduction of $32,000,000 in the amount available for return on the investment in property devoted to public use. Of this $32,000,000, the loss to the New England carriers will be approxi- mately $4,683,000. The Contract with the Pullman Company, I may say, continues to be the subject of discussion with that Company. Carriers are not receiving the full benefit of the award of the Commission in Ex Parte 74. All the New England States permitted increases in intrastate rates equal to the increases authorized by the Interstate Commerce Commission. This was not done by all the other States in the Eastern Rate group. I am not sure as to New England, with reference to commutation travel, but I understand that is correct as to all the others. That was the statement made to us by the railroad executives of New England. This was not done by all the other states in the Eastern rate group. The increases in passenger rates in Illinois were secured in December, 1920, and in New York were secured in part only during the same month and then by means of court proceed- ings, prior to which the carriers in Ilinois suffered a loss from this source of $2,096,472 and those of New York a loss of approximately $4,000,000. The increases have not become effective on intra- state passenger traffic in the States of Ohio, Indiana or Michigan, and only partially on intrastate freight traffic in Indiana and Illinois—the loss resulting is estimated at $3,070,462 per year in Illinois, $5,558,293 in Indiana, $2,978,960 in Michigan, and $5,018,045 in Ohio. I understand a decision has been handed down within the last two or three days in connection with Ohio, and in connection with the freight in Illinois, so that carriers may reasonably hope to get the matters adjusted, at least as to those rates within a short time. Certain increased operating costs were not included in the constructive year in Ex Parte 74: The cost of coal is 50 cents to $1.00 per ton greater than the cost which was included in the esti- mate of the carriers. It is hoped that under normal conditions the price will be as low as the price used’ in the constructive year. However, as the coal year ends on March 31, no change in contract coal can be secured prior to April 1 next. No allowance was made for a possible understatement of maintenance costs resulting from un- der-maintenance during the period included in the constructive year. (Shriver Statement above re- ferred to; that is, the one putting in the Exhibits to Nos. 1, 2 and 3 accompanying those exhibits.) 42 I will offer a letter from Mr. Parmelee, Director of the Bureau of Railway Economics, to my- self, dated January 13, 1921, inclosing an analysis of the net operating income compared with 6 per cent, on valuation, for class one roads, Eastern district, showing New England district sep- arately. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 145, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) Q. (By Mr. Choate): Mr. Williams, there is one now on your desk that has not gone out, and that is that Erie embargo. A. Ihad only proof copies for the Erie, and one other company. They have been turned over to the reporter; also the New York Central. We will see that copies are given to you of each of those. I will have all except the New York Central here probably tonight or in the morning, and then we can furnish those for your consideration. The New York Central was not in type. We will give you a typewritten copy of it. This exhibit, No. 145, contains figures compiled by the Bureau of Railway Economics. These data show that during the three months which ended with November 30th, 1920, the railways of the Eastern rate groups failed, by $50,499,212, to earn at the annual rate contemplated by the Commission in its decision in Ex Parte 74. The facts are summarized as follows: Income, 3 months at an- nual rate of Actual Income, 6% on value. 3 months Shortage New England lines _-__---------------------- $13,796,000 Def. $459,405 $14,255,405 Other lines 2252 ee ELSES 129,613,000 93,369,193 36,243,807 Total Eastern Rate group _---------------- $153,409,000 $92,909,788 $50,499,212 The New England Lines represented in the foregoing are the New Haven, Central New Eng- land, Boston & Maine, Central Vermont, Rutland, Boston & Albany, Bangor & Aroostook, Can- adian Pacific, Grand Trunk and Maine Central. The figures do not take into account lap-over items growing out of the settlements with the United States Railroad Administration. Mr. Parmelee informed me that he took the relation which these three months bore to a year’s earnings, on the basis of past performances, and used that as his basis in arriving at the average, at the annual rate, that might be expected fora year. That was, for the Eastern rate group, not totalled. He has used the same method of figuring in making his estimate for the New England lines. On this basis, for the three months, all the carriers in the Eastern rate group collectively would earn at the rate of 3.9 per cent on the value of the properties as assumed by the Commis- sion for the purposes of its order. Eliminating the nine New England lines from the group, the balance of the group actually earned at the rate of 4.3 per cent per year that was an earning less than the average of any year for twenty years. It is submitted that there could be no 43 justification for further reducing lines that are actually in receipt of much less than the statutory rate in order to increase the operating income of other lines. FIFTH WOULD THE CHANGES PROPOSED IN THIS PROCEEDING, CONSIDERING THE NEW ENGLAND LINES ALONE AND IRRESPECTIVE OF INJUSTICE TO THEIR CONNECTIONS, DIVERT REVENUES TO THE RAILWAYS AND IN THE PROPORTIONS BY WHICH ITIS NEEDED? It has been shown that the changes applied for in this case could not be accorded without tak- ing from carriers which are already earning less than a fair return upon the fair value of their property and that there is nothing in the way of peculiar disability of a nature that could entitle the complainants to what they seek. It is now to be noted that if the foregoing could be disregarded, the changes sought, while working a redistribution of revenues would not produce an equitable redistribution and would not afford relief to the lines by which it may seem to be needed or in pro- portion to their necessities. It is noted, of course, that although there are ten New England lines, only seven of them are parties complainant in this proceeding. The Boston & Albany, Grand Trunk, and Canadian Pacific are not asking relief. I am referring there only to Class I Lines in speaking of the ten and seven. It would be impossible, however, to grant relief in the form sought without extending the same favor to these carriers. Whatever additional revenues should accrue to them on account of such action would be in addition to the total which the complainant lines seek to divert. Moreover, the amounts diverted to New England would be drawn most unfairly from the other carriers. The claim of the New England lines is that by reason of their inclusion the other railways in the East- ern rate group gained 1.59 per cent. (Mr. Brigham’s Exhibit No. 7) in the percentage increase ac- corded to them. If this is true no railway outside of New England gained' more than 1.59 per cent. TI am not discussing the correctness of that percentage, but merely its application; but the amounts proposed to be diverted to New England would be drawn in a preponderating extent from the im- mediate connections of the New England carriers and almost wholly from railways that would thus be compelled to sacrifice more than they are alleged to have gained. I will offer a statement, which will be Exhibit No. 146, which shows, for the seven complain- ant lines, and then for the Boston & Albany, and then the total for the eight lines, in the first column, 6 per cent return (Brigham Exhibit No. 6) ; the second column, the estimated net rail- way operating income of the seven New England lines based on the constructive year October 31st, 1919 (Brigham Exhibit No. 6, Sheet 2, Column 5; Column 9) ; the third column is the estimated net railway operating income of seven New England lines based on the year ended June 30th, 1920 (Mr. Brigham’s Exhibit No. 1); the fourth column shows the net fixed charges to be met out of operating income (Brigham Exhibit No. 8) ; the fifth column shows the estimated amount by which roads will fail to meet fixed charges, based on the year ended June 30th, 1920 (Brigham Exhibit No. 3); the sixth column shows the alleged deficiency for each line, on account of the New Eng- land lines being included in Eastern rate group—that is, Column 1 less Column 3; Column 7 shows the revenue from proposed arbitraries, based on data given to me by Mr. Choate. 44° This Exhibit 146 shows the facts in detail. Among other things, it shows that the Boston & Maine, which claims to have a deficit below the amount necessary to pay 6% upon its cost of property of $2,507,444 per year, would receive $8,351,000, or almost three and one-half times this deficit, out of the total diverted. On the other hand, the New York, New Haven and Hartford, which claims on the same basis a deficit of $13,946,930, would receive $9,824,000. Similar inequalities would exist with respect to other lines. No basis for a redistribution of amounts thus diverted to New England has been suggested and no method is known by which a redistribution within that territory could be made. I am speaking now as to the record in this case. Certainly it could not be made to the prejudice of the United States if the Government has a substantial interest in revenues in excess of 6%. CONFERENCES WITH NEW ENGLAND LINES Reference has been made in the testimony (Mr. Elliott, Record 522) to discussion between rep- resentatives of the parties to this proceeding which, while dealing with some of the matters that have been brought to the attention of the Commission has no real connection with the question here pending, which is whether the New England railways are entitled, under the law, to the increased divisions they seek. A Committee of Twelve Presidents (three of whom were from New England) was appointed, and I was elected as the Chairman. At a certain stage of their progress it was ar- ranged that the railways of the Eastern Rate group, outside of New England, should be represented in them by President Rea of the Pennsylvania Railroad, President Maher of the Norfolk & Western and the present witness, Chairman of the Board of the Wabash Railway. The New England Rail- ways at the same time designated President Hustis of the Boston & Maine, President Pearson of the New Haven, and Mr. Choate, of Counsel in this proceeding, as their representatives. The foregoing met, and the New England representatives were informed at the outset by the representatives of the other railways, that the latter consider the existing divisions of through rates applicable to traffic in and out of New England as not only reasonable and just, but exceedingly lib- eral to the New England carriers, and that no enhancement of the proportions east of New Eng- land gateways could be conceded. The representatives of the lines west of New England inquired of the New England representatives whether, if the former were to recommend to the Presidents of their constituent lines that if they could do so with the approval of the Commission and “without prejudice to the rights of the respective parties,” to raise during the year beginning with December, 1920, the sum of $12,000,000, to be paid to the New England lines for that year only, said action would be acceptable to the New England lines. This suggestion was not received favorably by the New England representatives and, thereupon, the representatives of both sections of the rate group reported to their constituent railways that they were unable to make any recommendations in the premises. 45 The foregoing is the complete record of the so-called compromise offer of $12,000,000, and it is submitted that there is nothing in this incident which could properly affect the judgment of the Commission in this proceeding. The Committee of three Executives representing the lines outside of New England, in express- ing their willingness to recommend a payment of $12,000,000, limited, as stated, at all times insisted that the offer which they were proposing to suggest was not based upon any concession of legal right but that on the contrary they were fully satisfied that the present allowances to New Eng- land lines out of the through rates are as great as could be admitted or justified in law. The offer was based, and was understood to be based, wholly upon a willingness to go as far as possible in relieving the immediate financial condition of the New England carriers and to make the utmost sacrifice that could be justified in law or in ethics in order to protect the general railway credit situation which it was recognized might be impaired should any New England line be unable to extricate itself from present difficulties. It was prompted by the view that a payment of the amount stated, during the year referred to, would afford these carriers ample time to rearrange their own schedules of rates and in other suitable ways to equalize their expenditures and income or otherwise satisfactorily to adjust their financial responsibilities. There has been introduced on behalf of the New England lines (Choate Exhibit No. 1, p. 20) a copy of letter written by Vice-President Campbell of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Rail- road to the Chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated April 10, 1920. In view of the introduction of this letter, it is considered that further correspondence concerning the same subject matter should be made a part of this record. A copy of the letter of Mr. Campbell, above referred to, was sent to Mr. G. H. Ingalls, Vice President of the New York Central Lines and Mr. Ingalls thereupon, under date of April 14, 1920, wrote to Mr. Campbell, sending copies of his letter to Mr. W. C. Maxwell, Vice President in Charge of Traffic of the Wabash, and Mr. George D. Dixon, Vice President in Charge of Traffic of the Pennsylvania Railroad. Mr. Ingalls’ letter follows: TO MR. B. CAMPBELL, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HART- FORD RAILROAD COMPANY, FROM MR. GEO. H. INGALLS, VICE PRESIDENT, NEW YORK CENTRAL LINES, dated April 14, 1920: “Referring to your letter to Mr. Clark, Chairman of the Interstate Commerce Com- mission : “According to my recollection the New England lines have never discussed with our Committee the question of a division or apportionment of the rate increase in respect to ous various territories within the Official Classification Territory. “T am not disposed to criticise, but is there not some danger that the Commission might consider your letter as voicing the views of our Committee in the fact that we were considering and devising means of distributing a greater increase to New Eng- land lines, and in view of the fact, as stated above, that this has not been discussed or any conclusion arrived at by our Committee, it might be well to point that matter out to the Commission.” 46 Mr. Campbell’s reply to the above letter was as follows: TO MR. G. H. INGALLS, VICE PRESIDENT, NEW YORK CENTRAL LINES, FROM MR. B. CAMPBELL, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, dated April 14, 1920. “Answering your letter of this date: “My letter of the 10th inst. to Chairman Clark was purely a review of the subjects that were orally discussed at the informal conference with the Commission, held on the 7th inst., and was put in written form in compliance with the suggestion from the Chairman and one or two members, that the things that were said be placed before the Commission in written form. “Commissioner Hall asked me the question whether an average percentage increase would meet the New England roads’ requirements, to which I replied that it would not, but that the New England roads were anticipating that a way might be found for passing to them the difference, as stated in my letter. “Personally, I do not consider the matter under discussion one of option with the lines connecting with the New England carriers. If an average percentage increase should be granted, which is made up of the requirements of the New England carriers, there will be a given sum of money in the possession of the connecting carriers which will belong to the New England roads, and the Commission will, naturally, be asked by those carriers to have that money reach them through some method, the form of which will be suggested to the Commission. “Under the circumstances, there is no qualification to my statement that could be made to the Commission.” As indicating that the New England Lines did not feel that there was any commitment made by the lines West of Pittsburgh, Mr. E. J. Pearson, President of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, under date of May 9, 1920, addressed identical letters to various mem- bers of the Eastern Presidents’ Conference. The following, received by me, is copy of Mr. Pear- son’s letter: Mr. Newcomb (interposing): If the Examiner please, this is a pretty long letter. Perhaps it might be handed to the stenographer. . Attorney-Examiner Gerry: Do you have that in exhibit form? The Witness: No. I can put it in that form if it is desired. I could have it done that way within a couple of days. Attorney-Examiner Gerry: Very well. You may read it, and the stenographer need not transcribe it. You may furnish a copy of it later.* The Witness (continuing): The matter was the subject of discussion at some meetings, some committees were appointed, and some reports were made, but the carriers were unable to work out a solution among themselves. *(See ‘‘Defendants’ Exhibit No. 204, Witness Williams.’’) 47 CONCLUSION It is evident that the New England lines can materially reduce the cost of their coal. They should make substantial savings in per diem and other charges. Over and above this they may be in need of additional revenues. If they are to remain in the Eastern rate group this should be secured through a readjustment of New England rates. If this cannot be done without violence to the general rate structure in the Eastern rate group it should then be accomplished by placing the New England lines in a separate rate group. In connection with less than carload movement, the tonnage interchanged between The Dela- ware and Hudson and the Boston & Maine for the first 11 months of 1920 showed that we gave to them 135,082 tons of less than carload freight, and we received in exchange 236,492 tons. Inasmuch as according to the reports the 1. c. ]. tonnage on the New Haven is considerably in excess of that of the other lines, it would seem fair to assume that the percentages might be in even greater pro- portion. But I have not been able to get the figures as to that. There are two other exhibits. I would like to offer a statement showing the operating statist- ics of the railroads in the New England states for the year ended December 31st, 1918, prepared from the Interstate Commerce Commission report, a preliminary abstract of statistics of common carriers, for that year. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 147, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) Also a statement showing the operating statistics of the railroads in the Eastern district, ex- cluding the New England district, and showing the total for the Eastern district of all the lines there, taking the figures as reported by the Commission in its preliminary abstract. They show the Eastern district, and then we have pulled the New England district out of that, so as to show the total, excluding them. Then, the Commission had thrown some of the Pocahontas lines into the Southern district, and we pulled the Pocahontas lines back into it, so as to show the total of the Eastern district, excluding the New England lines. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 148, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) That is generally to show the ton mile, train mile, car mile figures, etc., on a comparative basis, taken from the Commission’s report. Then, I would offer as an exhibit a statement compiled from the operating statistics bulletin, issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission. This statement shows the figures for April and September, and also for the first nine months ending with September, 1920, compared with a cor- responding period of 1919. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 149, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) 48 That is the Commission’s monthly bulletin, and it makes various comparisons. I have another exhibit I would like to offer, being an analysis of freight and passenger train earnings on 14 roads operated exclusively in Trunk Line territory for the calendar year 1919. The information shown thereon is compiled from statistics in Poor’s Manual of Railroads for 1920. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 150, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) That shows the information for each of these roads that operate exclusively in Trunk Line ter- ritory, excluding the New England lines. Two other lines really should have been included there in a statement of that kind. I think the Virginian and the R. F. & P. really do operate exclusively in that territory. The Norfolk & Western and the Chesapeake & Ohio extend into C. F. A. territory. That shows the figures, and then the grand total for those lines. It is interesting to note that the average haul per ton per railroad is 120.98. It is not materially different from New England, when you consider that these are simply the railroads that do not go beyond the Trunk Line territory. The exhibit gives further information also. The average haul per road in New England district, in the year 1919, was 112.47. I would offer a statement that shows comparative figures by roads, and then the average haul per road in New England, for each year, 1910 to 1919, both inclusive. (The paper referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 151, Witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) Q. (By Mr. Newcomb) Mr. Williams, when you consider the traffic and operating conditions in New England, and the percent. of engine ratings which they are able to secure, and the train- loads, what conclusion do you reach as to the reasons for the light train loads? A. The fact that out of each thousand pounds tractive power, they had a greater percentage of gross tons back of the engine than we did indicated that whatever the conditions were that tend to reduce the tonnage in a train, the adverse effect thereof was less in New England than it was on the lines west of New England. Q. You found that they were making the most that could be made in the way of loading, with the engines that they had available? A. They had a slightly better percentage. The gross tonnage back of the engine, the percentage of that gross tonnage to the hauling capacity of the engine, was a little bit better than west of New England. Q. Did you find that they were under any special disability on account of the frequency of junction points in New England? A. Comparison of the tractive power shows that, as to that, it did not adversely affect the tonnage that they got back of the engines. So far as the junction points are concerned; or the 49 terminal facilities, by reason of the fact that it simply showed the total per ton mile, without separating carload and less than carload, and without separating the traffic local to New England, ‘or local to one line, as against the traffic interchanged with connections, it is difficult to reach a con- clusion as to what the situation is on the interline traffic. I have already explained the difference between the character of traffic they give to us and the class of traffic we give to them. We give them carload traffic considerably in excess of what they give to us. For example, take carload ton- nage. The Delaware and Hudson Company gave the Boston & Maine, in 1916, 4,630,058 tons of car- load freight, and received from them only 732,830 tons of carload freight, or about one-sixth. In 1917 The Delaware and Hudson gave the Boston & Maine 5,630,849 tons of carload freight, and received in exchange 806,781 tons of carload freight. I have already stated as to the difference in the 1. c. 1., indicating that it is much greater west- bound than eastbound. The figures as to the Boston & Albany are relatively in the same propor- tion as to the Boston & Maine. The carload traffic in 1916 to them was 513,248, and from them was 81,825 tons; in 1917, to them, 440,141 tons of carload traffic, and from them, 108,591 tons. On less than carload tonnage, The Delaware and Hudson gave them in 1916, 21,044 tons, and re- ceived from them 20,352, being almost the same. In 1917 The Delaware and Hudson gave them 10,570 tons, of less than carload freight, and received in exchange 19,883 tons. Q. (By Mr. Newcomb) Have you any further comment that you care to make concerning any of the data that has been presented? A. I think not. Only one thing. I only want to say that I cannot help reaching the conclusion, in going over it, that the New England lines have been operating under exceptional conditions during the last year, at least, and possibly during the war period, the full effect of which I am unable to state. Mr. Newcomb: If the Examiner please, Mr. Bronson desires to ask one question of this wit- ness before he is cross examined. Q. (By Mr. Bronson) I want to ask you a question, Mr. Williams, somewhat similar to the ques- tion I asked Mr. Hildum yesterday. You have referred several times in your testimony to the situation of five particular trunk lines and C. F. A. lines, to-wit., the C. & O., the Norfolk & Western, the Virginian, the R. F. & P., and the Southern, I want to ask, as a matter of record in this case, the purpose you had in mind in separating these particular carriers from other Trunk Line and C. F. A. roads and using the combined results of these five roads in this, a division case? A. Well, there are two things connected with it. In the first place, the data of the Interstate Commerce Commission has thrown their statistics in the Southern district, notwithstanding the fact that these roads have been members of the Trunk Line Association for many years. I assume that is simply an oversight in the classification. Q. It is an old method? A. Yes; because their traffic is more in harmony with that of the Western Maryland, the B. & O., and to some extent the Pennsylvania. 50 Q. The Director General, during the period of Federal control, had a separate regional direc- tor for some of the lines in that group, or in that geographical territory, and it was known as the Pocahontas group, for operating purposes. Therefore the statistics of the Director General showed them for that territory separately. They showed them for New England separately, and then they showed them for what is known as the Allegheny region, where Mr. Markham was in charge. Mr. Smith’s territory was divided into three groups, the Ohio-Indiana, the New England, and one other group, after the Allegheny group was taken away, and the Pocahontas; but Mr. Smith’s Eastern district originally included them all? A. Yes. So, in throwing the tables together, it was necessary to pick them out, and I have en- deavored, so far as possible, to simply use the figures as they come in the official reports, making it easier to handle it, in going over the record and checking it up. Furthermore, in tabulating those figures, when I first looked into the situation I was under the impression, by reason of the inclusion in the Southern group, that those lines were Southern lines, and I did, in preparing a memorandum for consideration of the railway executives, suggest that among other things they might consider the question of whether the Pocahontas lines should be construed as a separate group, assuming that New England was to be considered as a separate group; but there never was any discussion of that subject in quite that way. The real purpose of bringing it forward in the subsequent discussion is to.show that here are five lines—now only four, because the R. F. & P. and the Washington-Southern were consolidated; the R. F. & P. and the Washington-Southern, I do not believe, have ever been construed as a trunk line up to this time. Q. How is that? The other three were. The R. F. & P. have not? I am not sure. Yes; they have always been. Was the Washington-Southern ? 2 > © p © > The Washington-Southern too. A. Then, these lines constitute five lines which operate in Trunk Line and C. F. A. territory, and yet have a distinct geographical location. When we come to consider the question of divisions as between the New England lines, we find that these lines have practically no interchange with New England. If the statement of facts be as stated by Mr. Brigham, and further changed in the exhibits by Mr. Hildum, the amount that they got, or were expected to get, but which they are not getting—and it is all based on hopes—was going to be in excess of 6 per cent. by about the same amount as the New England lines claim to have lost below 6 per cent. There are no divisions between them. Then, it seemed to follow naturally that as to the rest of the roads in that group, which did have interchange with the New England lines, that those lines in the group were not earning substantially above the 6 per cent. 51 Q. Then, as I understand, to be brief, the original memorandum that you prepared was pre- pared under a misapprehension of facts, due to the fact that those five roads were carried in the Southern accounting tabulation of the Interstate Commerce Commission, while Trunk Lines and C. F, A. lines? A. I think my statement fully covers the circumstances under which it was prepared. As I say, when I first started out, I did not know that they were not members of the Trunk Line Asso- ciation. Q. It is not your desire, in referring to the Pocahontas lines in this proceeding, to have any inference drawn that these lines are not properly ‘'runk Lines and C. F. A. lines, and therefore properly included in the Eastern group, is it? A. No, sir. Q. I asked Mr. Hildum a question yesterday, and I understood him to answer it pretty much along the same line as you have answered. I will read you the question which I put to him. It is very brief. I expect this is about what you mean, so far as the use of these figures is concerned, in connection with this, a division case: “Q. Am I to infer that the real object of your Exhibit 126 and references to the Pocahontas group is to show, for the purposes of this, which is a pure division case, that by excluding the five Trunk Line and Central Freight Association lines, which serve the so-called Pocahontas portion of Trunk Line and C. F. A. territory, so located geographically that the New England interchange traffic is negligible, the other Trunk and C. F. A. lines which handle substantially all the New Eng- land interchange traffic profited to but a slight extent, based upon the figures in Brigham’s Exhibit No. 6, and to no extent whatsoever based on your exhibit No. 126, by the inclusion of New England in the Eastern group? Is that the real object of separating the Pocahontas lines and including them in your exhibits and your testimony?” A. Ido not see any difference between that statement and mine, except that I go back into the history of the development of the Pocahontas proposition. Mr. Bronson: I am very much obliged to you. That is all. Mr. Newcomb: You may cross examine. Mr. Choate: Mr. Examiner, might I ask a very few questions tonight, and then suspend the cross examination of Mr. Williams with reference to the exhibits until Monday? The Witness: I am sorry I will not be able to be here Monday or Tuesday. We have a confer- ence in New York, and I must act on that, and I want to go over some matters with the board on Monday. I could make it Wednesday. Q. (By Mr. Choate) How about tomorrow? A. Tomorrow I will be at your disposal any hour of the day or night, or Sunday, if you work Sunday. 52 Mr. Choate: I suppose the Examiner would not want to sit on Sunday. If I have time to go over these exhibits, would you be able to go ahead tomorrow? The Witness: Yes, sir. Mr. Choate: I will let you know in the morning. (At this point followed brief informal discussion of the record, at the conclusion of which a short recess was taken, following which the hearing was resumed as follows:) CROSS EXAMINATION. Q. (By Mr. Choate) Mr. Williams, what was the date of that letter which you read, that Mr. Pearson wrote to the Presidents of the Eastern railroads? A. Those are not the Presidents of the Eastern rate group. Those are the Presidents of the Eastern Conference. That is a little different: That consists of Presidents who have offices in New York, and J think they do forward them to the presidents of other eastern lines, and then, any president who may have an office in New York, or who may be there—it is a little broader than that. Q. What was the date of that letter? A. That was May 9th. Q. Was any written reply made by the Presidents of the Eastern Conference to that letter? A. No; there was not. There were a number of meetings at which Mr. Pearson was present. Q. There were committees appointed, were there not, to consider his suggestion? A. I think there were two committees appointed, a Traffic Committee and an Accounting Com- mittee. Q. Those Committees met and conferred and made a report on August 11, 1920, did they not? A. I could not say the date they made the report. They made two or three reports. The first report was to the effect that— Q. (interposing). Pardon me. I just asked you the date. A. I could not state as to the date. Q. About August 11, 1920, they made the report? A. I could not say. Q. Among other things, they said in that report, in reply to Mr. Pearson’s suggestion, this, did they not? “Statements show the percent. of increase in freight revenue necessary to produce a railway operating income equaling 6 per cent. of the property investment by individual roads, summarized to show separately totals for New England, Trunk Line, and C. F. A. territory. The percents. are as follows: 53 “(1) New England, 47.407 per cent.; (2) Trunk Line, 29.767 per cent.; (3) C. F. A., 24.434 per cent.; (4) total 29.461 per cent.; (5) Trunk Line and C. F. A. combined, 27.981 per cent.; (6) excess of (4) over (5) (that is, excess of Trunk Line and C. F. A. combined over the total), 1.48 per cent.” A. Well, I would have to accept that as your statement, I could not possibly carry all those figures in my mind and say at this time that those were the exact figures. Q. That committee reported this $24,000,000 or $25,000,000 which we have been discussing as having gone principally to the C. F. A. lines, did it not? A. It is my recollection that some statement of that kind did indicate that, and that was why I have shown in here the fallacy of that line of reasoning, because it is simply estimates made at the time. Q. I just wanted to bring out the fact that the first report was that it went to the C. F. A. lines. A. There have been several statements made, but it is rather difficult, in a rate group like this, and with the many conflicting factors, to get at the facts. We have been working diligently, and did all the way through. We have tried to get the New England lines to agree with us on the facts. Q. You have attributed to Mr. Campbell the origin of this suggestion that the $19,000,000 went to the Pocahontas? A. I beg your pardon; I did not. I said Mr. Campbell made reference to it in the record. I stated myself I was the man who first raised the Pocahontas question. That is quite different. Q. You originated the idea that the Pocahontas lines got $19,000,000 out of the $25,000,000 or so? A. I don’t know that I stated the exact amount. I did raise the Pocahontas question, yes. Q. By another wave of your wand, you have made the $19,000,000 disappear altogether. A. I don’t recall that it was any wave of my wand. I did not prepare the figures. You have some other people that are making these estimates. I am simply using the figures which the con- ference committees got together. It is quite impossible for me to go through all these details. There have been different people having different ideas. Q. By your Exhibit No. 144 that you put in today— A. (interposing) Yes. Q. (continuing) The $19,000,000 that went to the Pocahontas lines has practically vanished into thin air, has it not? A. Which is Exhibit No. 144? Q. Have you got it there before you? A. (Examining papers). I should say that if the lines in this Eastern group are not earning over 3.9 per cent., it certainly does not exist any place. 54 Q. That is Exhibit No. 144? A. Yes; that shows that the Pocahontas lines—although it was claimed there was a state- ment furnished in Ex Parte 74 that showed certain lines would earn in excess of 6 per cent., and these lines did anticipate at that time that they would earn in excess of 6 per cent., this shows that our estimates were quite above our actual results. Q. So, the history of this $25,000,000 is that it was first chased into C. F. A. territory, then into the Pocahontas lines, and now it is gone altogether? A. Back of all that is the question of whether there was $25,000,000. We never could agree on whether there was or not. Q. Just a word more about this conference. No reply being made to Mr. Pearson’s letter, and nothing coming of the report of the two committees, this petition was brought, and while the pe- tition was pending, the conference occurred in New York, which you referred to in your testimony, where you said that a subcommittee, of which you were a member, submitted a proposition of $12,000,000, which the New England lines declined to entertain. Now, it is a fact, is it not, that when you submitted that proposition of $12,000,000, the New England lines said that it was not sufficient to enable them to meet their fixed charges? A. Well, I should not want to let that statement go just the way you stated it. Q. That statement was made to you, was it not? A. But I am taking your whole statement to me. I would say that I cannot answer that whole statement. You have two things there. You leave the impression that this letter of Mr. Pearson’s was never answered. Q. So you have said. A. Not in writing: That is a different thing. Mr. Pearson, the following day, sent a mes- sage, in which he asked for a conference, and there was a conference. As I said before, it was con- sidered at different times, but we were unable to agree; so that I should not want to leave that kind of an impression. Q. Let me bring your mind to the conference in New York, at which you say the $12,000,000 proposition was submitted. A. Yes. Q. You say reply was made to that, in the first place, that $12,000,000 would not enable the New England lines to meet their fixed charges, was it not? A. That is right, and at that time we could not agree on the figures in the case, the New England representatives and ourselves. Q. In addition to that, the suggestion was made by your subcommittee that that $12,000,000 would be contributed by a percentage upon the freight revenues of the lines west of the Hudson River, was it not? A. How does that question read? 55 Mr. Choate: Read it to him, please. (The reporter read the question referred to, as follows:) “Q. (By Mr. Choate) In addition to that, the suggestion was made by your subcommittee that that $12,000,000 would be contributed by a percentage upon the freight revenues of the lines west of the Hudson River, was it not?” A. Suggestion made to whom? Q. To the New England subcommittee? A. Ido not understand we discussed with them the method in which we would raise the money, and we never reported the resolution out to the people as a whole. I will say frankly that that was what we thought we might have to do, if we could get the lines to vote on the proposition, and if you had accepted it, that is probably what we would have recommended. Q. You also said at that time that you had not realized the full 40 per cent. on your inter- change business with the South and West, and that you had not realized your whole 40 per cent. on certain intrastate rates, did you not? : A. That is correct, and we have not yet. Q. And we replied to you that if that was so, and you had not realized all that you hoped you would under the Order in Ex Parte 74, that we were willing to share that loss with you, and we offered to accept 1.1 per cent. of your freight revenues? A. No. That is not quite the proposition. That leaves the impression that you are comparing 1.48, or 1.47 and 1.1. You will recall that when you made that statement in the meeting of the presidents as a whole, I then asked you if it was not the fact that 1.1 per cent. upon the current freight revenues would be expected to produce 1.53 or 1.54 per cent. upon the freight revenues shown in Ex Parte 74, and you answered in the affirmative. So, when we talked about those, we were talking relatively about the same thing, only stated in two different ways. Q. You recall that we did make the counter proposition that we would accept 1.1 per cent. of your freight revenues? A. That was not coupled with it, however, the fact that we did not get the full 40 per cent.: We were discussing the question of the 1.48. You then jumped up your figures, and you have gone to 1.53 or 1.54, or something of the kind, and you were asking that you get the equivalent of 1.53 or 1.54 on the basis of Ex Parte 74; but then, if instead of that, we would simply base it on cur- rent revenues, on the 1.1 per cent, if we would get more than that, you would get more, and if we got less than that, you would get less, so that the relation of that to Ex Parte 74 would be dependent upon the amount of business. That would not compensate us in the slightest degree for the loss that we would sustain on inter-territorial traffic, for the loss on intrastate traffic, or for other losses of a similar nature; nor would it protect us against the changed conditions in the way of in- creased operating costs and things of that kind. It would not let us break even at all. Take your present situation, where these roads are earning at the rate of 3.9 per cent— 56 Q. (interposing). Pardon me. I am going to ask you to answer my question? Mr. Newcomb: Just let him answer the question. You asked a question, and he has not finished his answer. ~Q. (By Mr. Choate): You do recall a proposition submitted to you by the New England roads that they would accept 1.1? A. With these qualifications that I am stating. Q. That they would take 1.1 per cent on your freight revenues, whatever they were? A. No; not whatever they were. Whatever they might be. Those are two entirely different Q. Whatever they might be in the future? A. Just bear in mind, now, the difference between that and the revenues under Ex Parte 74. This is after the increase was on. Q. That is exactly the purpose with which the proposition was made to you? A. Yes; it was very ingenious. Q. That if you lost money, as you said you would, or were losing, we would share your losses with you? A. But when you asked that question you simply tied it up with the inter-territorial traffic. You did not couple that question, in asking me, at all with the loss in business that comes from industrial depression or the changed operating costs, and things of that kind. Q. It was necessarily tied up with any diminution in your revenue? A. All right; tie it up with your question, then, and we will be together from the beginning. Q. Then, the proposition was very plainly put to you, was it not, that we would accept 1.1 per cent of your freight revenues, however depressed those were by business depression, or failure to realize the full 40 per cent, or failure to realize the full increase on intrastate business. Is not that the fact? A. Not quite that way. You based the willingness to accept 1.1 per cent on the current freight revenues from month to month. Q. Whatever they might be? Whatever they might be. And that you declined? Certainly. That is all that you are asking in this case, and a little more. Pe That is not a correct statement, is it, Mr. Williams? A. Yes, because if the revenues did not decrease it would be based on gross revenues and not net. 57 Q. If your freight revenues fell below what they were in 1919, if your business fell off from what it was in 1919, we would receive very much less under that offer? You would receive a pro rata reduction. It is quite clear that 1.1 is less than 1.48, is it not? That would depend upon the volume of business in the period covered. Wait a minute. It is quite clear that the fraction 1.1 is very much less than 1.48. Just one minute; no. 1.48 is based on the revenue in Ex Parte 74. You are not answering my question. It is based on Ex Parte 74, the constructive year. You are not answering my question. You are trying to tie two things that are not together. Oo pop oro Po Pe One minute. Attorney-Examiner Gerry: Try not to talk both at the same time. -Q. (By Mr. Choate): I am asking you to compare 1.1 with 1.48. You will admit it is less, will you not? A. Not if they are not based on the same amount. They might be identical. Q. If they are based on the same amount, it is less? A. If they are based on the same amount. Q. If it is based on a less amount, it is a less amount of money? A. That is not a correct proposition either, because your 1.48, in the first place was based on the revenue in Ex Parte 74. Now, when you jump to your 1.1, that was based on those revenues plus 40 per cent. That is quite a different thing, and when you take the 1.1 and apply it to 1.48, as I did for you, in the New Haven Board Room, it became 1.54; so that your 1.1, instead of being less than 1.48, as a matter of fact, was 6 points greater. Q. If, as we replied to you, the 1.1 applied to the revenues that you then told us you were going to receive, instead of being 6 points greater, it would have been about $6,000,000 less, as we then pointed out to you, would it not? A. No; you didn’t point it out to us. Q. You certainly had it stated to you, that if what you said was so with reference to the de- pletion of your revenues, 1.1 would yield us from $18,000,000 to $22,000,000 instead of $25,000,000. A. I don’t know how you got at that amount, because that would all depend on what the revenues are. Q. Those figures were stated to you at the time, were they not? A. I don’t recall it. If you state it, I would be perfectly willing to accept your statement for it, Mr. Choate, but I don’t recall that figure. 58 Q. If you are going to discuss the conference, I want you not to leave the impression that you made a proposition of $12,000,000 and we turned it down, without making any counter proposition. We want to have the whole of it in there. A. Iam glad to have it all in. Mr. Choate: Now, if I may, I should like to suspend the cross examination of Mr. Williams until we shall have had time to look over the exhibits. Mr. Bills: Mr. Choate, will you proceed with Mr. Williams’ cross examination tomorrow? Mr. Choate: If we can do the necessary work on the exhibits tonight, we will. If we cannot, I would like to go on with Mr. Bradley tomorrow. I will let you know the first thing in the morning. REDIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Mr. Williams, you have some additional exhibits that were asked for by the other side, that you wish to present? , A. Ihave three. The first is the population of New England in connection with the census of 1920. I found I was able to get that. After that was prepared, my attention was called to the fact that in both of the exhibits,—I mean, in the first exhibit, as well as in this—the State of Ver- mont was omitted. The State of Vermont has a smaller population than New Hampshire. Just aminute. I can give that, I think. (After consulting papers:) It had 355,956 people in 1910, and 352,428 in 1920, none of which came within the 50-mile limit of tide. I state that so as to make it complete as to New England; but Vermont is excluded in the total figures. Q. Did you wish to make a correction with regard to the percentage of condemned coal cars? A. Justaminute. I want to complete this. J understood Mr. Pearson, from his testimony, to feel that there was a material change. It will be noted, comparing with my exhibit No. 130, which showed the census of 1910, that the per- centage of people living within 25 miles of the coast line is identical in 1920 and 1910; and of those living within 50 miles of the coast line in 1920, there were 73.29 per cent, and in 1910, 73.04 per cent. ' I offer that as an exhibit. (The statement referred to was received in evidence, marked “defendants’ Exhibit No. 203, witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: There was a letter of May 9th from Mr. E. J. Pearson, President of the New Haven road, forwarded to various members of the Eastern Presidents’ Conference, which I read at the time I was previously on the stand, but which it was stated the reporter need not take down, the understanding being that the letter would be introduced as an exhibit; and I offer that letter now as an exhibit: (The letter referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 204, witness Williams”, and the same is forwarded herewith.) 59 The Witness: Then, when I' was on the stand, I was asked, in connection with my exhibit No. 184, I believe, showing the number of manufacturing establishments in New England, as to whether it were possible to secure information which would show the capital invested, in the same comparative form; and I have been able to obtain that from the 1910 census. The information has not been collected by the Census Bureau in connection with 1920 census. I offer that as an exhibit: (The statement referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 205, witness Williams”, and the same ts forwarded herewith.) The Witness: When on the stand, speaking off the book, I stated that at the anthracite mines from 12 to 18 per cent of the coal was condemned. On checking that up, I find that it is from 10 to 12 per cent. I wanted to make that correction in the record. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. You mean, of the number of cars? A. Of the number of cars which are loaded at a breaker, from 10 to 12 per cent are con- demned by the inspectors of the coal companies. Of the total number of cars loaded, approximately 4 per cent are placed back in the empty yard, dropped by the breaker, unloaded, and pass through the breaker again for re-preparation. Some of the others are condemned as to the tonnage, and some are condemned account of prepara- tion, which is adjusted—either the coal sold as a different size, or some other provision made, which permits of its going to market. But there is a delay there until it has been handled by the inspectors. , By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Will you tell us what transfer facilities are maintained at Mechanicville for less than car- load freight? A. At Mechanicville there is a transfer station, as I recall, of the Boston & Maine and The Delaware and Hudson Company. Both handle transfer of less than carload traffic at Mechanicville; The Delaware and Hudson operating the station in connection with the westbound traffic. I assume that the Boston & Maine would handle it only as to the eastbound traffic. I should like to say, in connection with that transfer of less than carload freight, that Mr. Pearson intimated that we were trying to transfer that traffic as many times en route as possible. Using my illustration, you will recall that I made the statement that in the first instance the traffic would be transferred at Mechanicville. It is entirely a question of tonnage as to where the traffic goes from one transfer station—as to the destination of the tonnage loaded at a transfer station. You endeavor to load that as far as it is possible to load it and get a full car. If it is within 50 or 100 miles of the point of loading, you usually make a way car. If it goes beyond that, you may load a car that breaks bulk at a station, and after they take out of the car the traffic for the particular sta- tion, the way freight crew takes it along and peddles it out at other stations. But, if it is going any considerable distance, it may go through two or more transfer stations. It just depends on the volume of traffic at each loading station as to whether you can place in a car sufficient tonnage to 60 warrant sending that car through to any given destination; and it is not an unusual thing for less than carload traffic moving, say, 400 miles to be transferred two or four times en route. I had charge of the loading stations, of all stations on the B. & O. and on the Frisco, and was thoroughly familiar with their loading schedules at the time; and that is one of the unfortunate things which attaches itself to less than carload traffic. Q. You heard Mr. Miller’s testimony concerning your Exhibit No. 141. Do you wish to comment upon that in any way? A. No, not particularly. The embargoes, presumably, are issued because there is too much traffic for one point or one consignee, or because there is too much traffic for one road to handle. The situation as to New England is different, generally speaking, than that of the rest of the coun- try when it comes to embargoes. West of New England, if one line is in difficulty, or one gateway, it is usually possible to forward your traffic through over other lines or through other gateways. Generally speaking, the situation in New England is not materially different on the three east and west lines—that is, the New Haven, the Boston & Maine and the Boston & Albany ;—except that the Boston & Albany is usually freer in taking traffic than is the Boston & Maine. I have been interested in the coal trade in connection with The Delaware and Hudson mines for thirteen years, and in all of that period, with the exception of only one year, we have had diffi- culty in getting our coal on to the Boston & Maine Railroad, and up to the time of the war we pre- ferred not to sell any coal going to the New Haven, unless the connecting lines would furnish the cars, because it took so long for the cars to make the round trip that it tied up our mines. The cars did not come back in sufficient time to keep the mines running full, and the loss from the operation of the mines partial time was so great that we could not afford to stand it. Q. Did you, during the summer of 1920, make a special effort to get the coal into New Eng- land promptly, in order to get it out of the way of other equipment? A. It goes back of that period. As early as 1908, we made special arrangements urging the wholesale dealers handling the traffic on the Boston & Maine to make special provision so as to get the coal to move into Boston & Maine points in the summer months. That is one of the few places where the volume of traffic all-rail moving during the summer months is in excess of the volume of traffic moving all-rail through the winter months. As to anthracite coal, it was neces- sary for them to finance the dealers to some extent, in order to get them to handle it in that way. But that action was forced upon us, in order to secure the volume of that business which we were desirous of obtaining. I did have some correspondence in May, 1920, pointing out the dangers to New England if the action with reference to embargoes on coal during the summer months were not to be withdrawn and permit of the coal going forward to meet their winter necessities, and having particularly in mind the experience of thirteen years and the inability of the Boston & Maine to handle its monthly pro rata of the traffic during winter months; and I would offer as an exhibit a copy of my letter as Senior Vice-President of The Hudson Coal Company, addressed to Mr. Hustis, President of the Bos- ton & Maine, under date of May 10, 1920; his reply to me of May 14, 1920; my letter to him of 61 May 26, 1920, and his reply to me of May 29, 1920, clearly setting forth the difficulties we were hav- ing in connection with the handling of coal traffic. (The matter referred to was received in evidence, marked “Defendants’ Exhibit No. 206, Witness Williams’, and the same is forwarded herewith.) The Witness: I would say, as to that, that the situation last year was abnormal. This is practically the first year that we have had serious trouble during summer months, and I only men- tion it because I feel that it is abnormal, and that any abnormal results brought into the record ought to be given due consideration. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. Does that correspondence show the number of days during which you were unable to put coal out of Mechanicville for Boston & Maine points? A. There were 47 days during which we were unable to load coal for Boston & Maine points. I believe the Superintendent of Transportation of the Boston & Maine roughly estimated it, from our exhibit, to be 45 days, but there were 47 days between May Ist and the 1st of September, 1920, when we could not doit. As I say, that is an abnormal result. While we have always experienced trouble in the winter, this is the first time we have had serious trouble in the summer. Q. Were you present when Professor Cunningham testified this morning? A. I was. Q. Do you wish to make any comment upon his testimony? A. I should prefer to take it up in logical order, taking first Mr. Pearson’s testimony and then taking Professor Cunningham’s testimony. Q. Proceed in your own way. Attorney Examiner Gerry: How long will this take? We have gone past the adjournment hour. Mr. Newcomb: I think only a few minutes. The Witness: It may take forty minutes. Mr. Elder: The witness we have, I believe, will take only about ten minutes. So, if we con- tinue, there is just a possibility that we might conclude before six o’clock. I think that is the prob- ability, so far as I can judge. (At this point a brief informal recess was taken, at the conclusion of which the hearing proceeded as follows:) Attorney Examiner Gerry: Proceed, Mr. Williams. The Witness: I should like to say, in connection with that last exhibit, No. 206, that the cor- respondence shows to some extent an adverse situation on the Boston & Maine, as a result of the outlaw railroad strike and, presumably, some diversion of traffic from the southern roads to the northern roads, which were not so seriously affected by that strike. 62 In the testimony some statements have been made as to the relative wages paid in New Eng- land in former years, as against those paid on other lines, while today they are all working on a relatively uniform scale. I came in touch with that situation when doing special work for the General Managers’ Association of New York, as I stated when I qualified as a witness, and subse- quently have taken the matter up with Mr. Whiter and Mr. Walber and Mr. Duncan, who have handled the matter for the railroads. By reference to the Commission’s report of 1910, Statistics of Railways in the United States, page 39, we find a comparison of what are known as Group 1 roads with Group 2 roads; the Group 1 roads representing the New England lines and, apparently, a very short piece of the New York Central, and the Group 2 roads are the lines immediately west of there. The report goes into con- siderable detail to show the names of the individual lines; but it is interesting to see the compari- son at as early a date as 1900. The general officers—I will give Group 1 and Group 2 in column form. The first will be Group 1, and the second Group 2. Group 1 Group2 General Officers _____---_--- $10.70 This is the average daily compensation in dollars. Group. 22 soccso-- ee $11.25 Other officers ______-----___ 5.80 6.66 General office clerks_________ 2.08 2.30 | Station agents _____--______ 1.80 1.68 oF Other station men_________- 1.79 1.64 Engine men ____--------_-_- 3.48 3.62 Firemen ___--------------- 1.97 2.05 Conductors ____------------ 2.97 2.97 )5 Other trainmen _____-______ 1.94 1.90 Machinists ___-.-------_--- 229 219 ~— Carpenters ______---------- 2.06 2.04 ee Other shopmen ______------ 1.86 1.64 ~~ Section foremen __--------- 2.03 1.66 Other trackmen ____------_- 1.44 eal Switch tenders, crossing ten- ders and watchmen______- 1.48 1.59 Telegraph operators and dis- patchers ~-_------------- 1.84 2.01 Employes, account floating equipment ___----------- 1.71 2.01 All other employes and la- yo DOTrerS) oe cee ee ee 1.66 1.56 By ATTORNEY EXAMINER GERRY: Q. Does it give the average daily compensation for all the employes there? A. It does not; no, sir. Q. Does it give the average daily compensation excluding general officers? A. No. That, I believe, could be worked out from other tables that are in here (referring to book). I assume that there is here, some place, a statement of the total number of employes. 63 Yes; there is a statement here showing the total number of employes of each class, and then, as they show the aggregate pay-roll by classes and by groups, that could be ascertained by dividing one into the other. Now, the only place where New England seems to have had a lower scale was general officers, other officers, general office clerks, enginemen, firemen, switch tenders, crossing tenders and watch- men, telegraph operators and dispatchers, and employes account floating equipment. As to all the other classes, with the exception of conductors, which was identical, the pay in the case of the Group 2 lines was less than the pay in the case of the Group 1 lines. In 1907, when I came to The Delaware and Hudson, their rates were below the rates, for in- stance, of the Pennsylvania, which was known as a standard line, and we adjusted them in 1908. In the last two years a decision was handed down, growing out of an appeal made by all the lines that had less than what was known as the standard scale, and in going over the record in that case at the Bureau of Railway Economics it indicates that the wages were less on these larger systems west of New England than in the Eastern Rate Group. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton, Wheeling & Lake Erie, Coal & Coke, Cincinnati Northern, Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern, Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis, Lake Erie, Alli- ance & Wheeling, Lake Erie & Western, Kanawha & Michigan, New York, Susquehanna & West- ern, Pere Marquette, Toledo, St. Louis & Western, Wheeling & Lake Erie, Zanesville & Western; those roads being included in the presentation of the case. As to the pay of the enginemen and firemen, it should not be overlooked that the statistics of the Commission include the pay for both passenger enginemen and firemen and trainmen and con- ductors, as well as freight enginemen, firemen, conductors and trainmen. Now, the pay in passenger service is less than it is in freight service. That would in a large measure, if not entirely, account for the relatively slight difference in the average rates of pay in 1900. Furthermore, the pay of enginemen and firemen has for many years varied with the size of the locomotive, and with the larger locomotives in use west of New England that would also ac- count for any slight difference in the average rate of pay as to those two classes. In the data which I prepared for the General Managers’ Association, a very voluminous book, it was indicated that the pay in train service on the New Haven was greater than the pay for sim- ilar runs on the lines west of New England. The pay of the men in engine service was not com- parable, because they had thrown it on a weight basis, instead of on the basis of the size of the cylinder; so that the figures are not quite on the same basis. That was the only way in which we could get the information from the New Haven at the time, apparently their agreements being based on the weight of the engine, rather than on the size of the cylinder. In connection with Mr. Pearson’s statement that the revenue of the New Haven system’s local freight approximates 330 per cent. of the average operating cost, intra-New England 240 per cent., and the inter-Trunk Line only 82 per cent., I wish to emphasize my previous testimony as to the failure to bring in the variable factors. First is the class of traffic. The fluctuations as between the first six classes only are very considerable. Taking the present rates, for example, from Boston to New York City, as shown in 64 Mr. Maxwell’s exhibit 179, the first-class rate being 74 cents, second 6614 cents, third 5514, fourth 42, fifth 3014 and sixth 2414, it will readily be seen that in working out the revenue per ton mile the class of traffic that is handled is quite an important factor, and any comparisons that are made on ton miles ought to be on the basis of the same classes of traffic. Then comes the question of distance. The rate per ton mile decreases as the distance increases, until it gets to the irreducible minimum, whatever that might be. So that it is essential in mak- ing comparisons between the local traffic, the local inter-line in New England, and the inter-line traffic interchanged with trunk lines and Canadian lines, that they should give some data showing the average distance hauled. Now, in order to ascertain the average earnings per ton mile which they have introduced in this case, it was necessary for them to ascertain the aggregate tons handled and the aggregate tons moved one mile for each of the three classes of traffic. Therefore, it would have been relatively easy to have divided the tons into the ton miles and ascertained the distance each of those three classes of traffic is handled, and that would throw considerable light onto these figures which are used in making these comparisons. Then, as to the less-than-carload traffic, the volume originating on the New Haven being so exceptional and the volume handled on the New Haven in proportion to its total traffic being so exceptional as compared with the country, it seems quite important that there should be some analysis showing how much of that is local, how much of it local inter-line and how much of it is traffic interchanged with the lines outside New England. I have not quite the fear some have as to the question of analyzing the cost of the service. In so far as dividing up the freight traffic expense is concerned, we must first divide the expense he- tween passenger and freight service. I stated the other day that my belief is that the capacity of your line is dependent upon trains, in the first instance. A train is an engine, with or without cars, and carrying signals. Now, those trains must be spaced on the road, and if you have a single track you have got to give way for an opposing train, clear the track ten minutes if it is a pas- senger train, and five minutes if it is a freight; and, then, you are not permitted to run those trains too close together. So that the capacity of your line is first determined by the number of trains. Now, if you operate them at a uniform speed you get the maximum number of trains over a line. As I said the other day, that is why during the war in France all passenger and freight trains moved at one uniform speed. When you bring the varying speeds into play, you reduce the capacity of the line as to the number of trains that can be moved. Now, the next determining factor in the capacity of your line, of course, is your grade, and then comes the question of the capacity of your locomotive. After that comes the capacity and the average loading of your cars. On the lines in the West, where I have operated, we have had in effect an adjusted tonnage rating, going back to the Pennsylvania in the late 90’s and on other roads in the early part of this century. Prior to that time, while the operating men knew that an engine would not haul the same number of gross tons regardless of the number of cars in the train, they had never worked it out to determine the exact effect, and the practice then was to treat two empty cars as a load. 65 But when it came to the loaded cars, they had never worked out a suitable basis for equating the difference in the average tons per car; and the importance of that developed very rapidly after about 1895 or 1896, when the big car began to come into use. Prior to 1896, the average capacity of what you might consider the car of the time was about 40,000 pounds. Today a modern coal car has an average capacity of 100,000 pounds, or over. Now, as we brought in the larger car, the importance of the difference in the tonnage carried and the number of cars that were carrying the tonnage, and its effect on the train load, became more and more marked and necessitated giving it closer attention. So we experimented with cars of various capacities and cars with varying tonnage loading, and then had dynamometer tests made, with the result that we ultimately got down where we found that for the 0.8% grade line that adjusted tonnage was about 15 tons. Now, for a 2% grade line it is 3 tons; for a 1% grade line it is 5 tons, and for a 0.5% grade line it is 10 tons. Mr. Pearson, in commenting on my illustration of 0.3% grade line, stated that there are rela- tively few lines with those grades, and that my illustration accentuated the effect of the adjust- ment in the tonnage loading. I have, therefore, taken an engne that can haul 4,000 tons over a 0.3% grade line, an engine that can haul 4,000 tons over a 0.5% grade line, and an engine that can haul 4,000 tons over a 1% grade line. Those would have to be three entirely different engines. I am eliminating the effect of the grade, simply to show the effect of putting your tonnage into an in- creased number of cars. In each case I have taken the dead weight of thecar as 21 tons. The average paying load of cars in New England for the first nine months of 1910 was 24.2 tons, and for other roads in the Eastern Rate Group it was 32.9 tons. An engine that could haul 4,000 adjusted tons over 0.3% grade line could haul 1,911 tons, paying load, in cars having an average loading of 32.9 tons, and 1,607 tons in cars having an average loading of 22.2 tons. An engine that could haul 4,000 adjusted tons over a 0.5% grade line could haul 2,060 tons of paying load in cars having 32.9 tons average loading, and 1,754 tons in cars having an average load of 24.2 tons. An engine that could haul 4,000 adjusted tons over a 1% grade line could haul 2,234 tons, paying load, in cars with an average load of 32.9 tons, and could haul 1,928 tons of paying load in cars having an average load of 24.2 tons. Stated in another way, the percentage of the revenue tonnage—that is, of paying load —in a train with cars having 24.2 tons revenue freight, to the revenue tonnage in a train with cars having 32.9 tons each of revenue freight, would be 84.2 per cent. for a 0.8% grade, 85.2 per cent. for a 0.5% grade, and 86.3 per cent. for a 1% grade. Now, that does not make any material difference insofar as my statement, for purposes of illustration, is concerned; the fluctuation being relatively slight. Now, to handle the increased tonnage due to the lighter loading of cars necessitates an in- crease in the number of cars, an increase in the number of trains, an increase in the number of locomotives, in the number of créws, in the amount of fuel and other train supplies, an increase in yard facilities and, possibly, an increase in main track facilities—all of which requires addi- tional investment or additional operating expense, and without in the slightest degree increasing the operating revenue to the carrier. 66 Therefore, it is important to know, on the traffic that originates in New England and local to New England and the traffic which they interchange with their connections outside New England, as to whether the local traffic has a less loading per car. If it has, it very materially adds to the cost of performing the service. As to New England having no points originating a great volume of traffic, while that may be correct, except as to slate or granite, the New England lines do get from their connections a very great volume of traffic, as indicated by the exhibit which was put in by the Superintendent of Transportation of the Boston & Maine of the tonnage that they get at Mechanicville. Now, he indicated that *80 per cent. of that tonnage moves through to South Deerfield in solid trains, or can move in solid trains; that 80 per cent. of that which goes into South Deerfield can move into Ayer, and 30 per cent. of that which goes into South Deerfield can move into Boston. Mr. Brigham in his exhibit with reference to the tonnage admitted that there was a duplica- tion, and when I took the net tons that were handled, without duplication, and divided it into the tons moved one mile, I obtained an average distance that all freight moves within New Eng- land of 163 miles. I am only bringing that out because of the point that is in my mind—that it does not indicate a short terminal service. One hundred and sixty-three miles does give a substan- tial road movement; and it certainly does not come within the Commission’s classification of ter- minal and switching lines. And the illustration made or the exhibit introduced by the Superin- tendent of Transportation of the Boston & Maine indicates that a very substantial part of its traffic—80 per cent. of what we give them at Mechanicville—goes 100 miles. As to some of the balance, of the 20 per cent. which is cut off, some of it is going over to other lines, and to that extent they have overhead traffic. To the extent of the tonnage going into Ayer, which is 60 per cent. of the traffic delivered to them at Mechanicville, to the extent that that goes to other lines they have overhead traffic. And the difference between the actual tons which are handled and the total tons which are handled, including duplication, is so marked as to indicate that if all the facts are developed the New England lines must have a substantial overhead traffic of their own. It was for that purpose I was attracting attention to the average distance hauled of 163 miles in New England. By Mr. NEWCOMB: Q. You are basing your testimony on that upon your recollection of Mr. Miller’s testimony? A. Yes, sir. He said *80 and 80 and 30. Now, as to the percentage of the tonnage rating which you get back of the engine, and which Mr. Cunningham says he introduced during the period of the United States Railroad Administra- tion or, at least, he was connected with the Administration in the use of those figures: I was familiar with that system over 13 years ago. I do not know its origin, but am under the impres- *(Mr. Miller said 90% to 92%.) 67 sion that it originated on the Great Northern Railroad. We have it in use on the Kansas City Southern, of which road I am a director, and it has been in use on other lines. Even though the Interstate Commerce Commission should discontinue the statistics, we would continue to prepare them ourselves, for economic operation of our line. The figures are not conclusive, when prepared in just the way that the Railroad Administra- tion prepared them. We divide our traffic into quick dispatch and slow or continuous movement traffic. We divide it by directions, and we divide it as between main line and branch line traffic. Now, unless you give consideration to the effect which those variable factors would have in these results, you do not get the full effect; but, after all, the figure as shown does indicate in a general way what you are able to secure under all conditions that control the loading of your locomotive. But, insofar as operation on an individual property is concerned, to enable you to follow it through closely, you would have to make the separation I spoke of. Now, the New England lines get a better movement in each direction, apparently, than do the lines west of New England; my exhibit showing a little better percentage of loads to the total num- ber of cars handled, and that would in a measure account for their getting a little better percent- age of tonnage back of the engine. But, whatever the factors are, whether it be the tonnage by directions, by branch lines, or whatever the factors are, it does show that they are getting a little better tonnage back of their engines than we. Now, as to the size of locomotive, clearly with the volume of the traffic that is moving east of Mechanicville, with 80 per cent. moving to Deerfield, with 80 per cent. of the Deerfield ton- nage moving to Ayer, there is no good reason why as large a locomotive cannot economically be used there as can be used west of New England for similar grades. They are only coming to the use of the large locomotive. As I understood the testimony of Mr. Cunningham, he referred to the changes they had to make in their bridges. He was not sure whether they had completed the work or whether they could go on installing the larger locomotive. West of New England we have been busy for some years in changing our roadbed and strength- ening our bridges so that we could put in heavier power and get the economies which come from that power. Now, as to their ability to finance needed improvements of that kind, clearly if the New Haven had taken the money which it has expended for trolley lines, being in excess of $100,000,000, the money which they have expended in other directions, such as their guaranty of the Westchester line, involving the guarantee of interest in excess of $800,000 per year, and other money of that kind, and had utilized that same credit for their common carrier property as a steam railroad, they would be in better shape. When it comes to the Boston & Maine, they lease a number of lines. They have just been in the hands of the court. They had their election, when they were in the hands of the court, as to whether in reorganizing that line they would cut off such lines as were not satisfactory earners or whether they would elect to keep them, and they elected to keep them. Now, if those lines are a hardship insofar as this interchange traffic is concerned, clearly, if we are to be charged for the cost of supporting them, we should have had some voice as to whether they were to keep them or 68 not. And, if they had eliminated some of the poorer earning lines, these low earning branch lines, which they say cannot use modern power—if they had eliminated them in their reorganization, as some of the other lines have done, it would have made their traffic more remunerative at this time. Now, as to the average mileage of locomotives, Mr. Pearson testifying, on pages 2,531 and 2,582, and Mr. Cunningham, I think, today, I did not use that figure, although it was on one of my exhibits. I made no comment upon it in my testimony. It is dependent upon the number of engines in work stock and the volume of traffic that is moving. If, for example, you had 15 loco- motives withdrawn from service and not written out of your accounts, those engines would be used in figuring out the average mileage of your locomotives; or, if you had 15 engines that were laid up—I mean, if you are not running your engines full and you are taking them first in and first out, but there is considerable loss of time at the terminals by reason of the volume of traffic not needing all the engines to be used, it will pull down the average miles per locomotive. All roads must have engines to move the maximum traffic, or as near the maximum traffic as they can afford to have. So that that mileage figure is quite a variable factor. Mr. Pearson commented on the Trunk Lines, at page 2,535, requiring the New Haven to fur- nish some of the New Haven’s cars used in loading company fuel. I had assumed from the other testimony, to the effect that they were having difficulty in getting cars off their lines, that that would be to their advantage and some credit would be given us. Now, the situation as to the owner of a car in times of business depression is no different in New England than outside New England. When you are paying a dollar a day for a car, whether you have any need for it or not, you are going to get it home as quickly as possible, whether it is owned in New England or whether it is owned in Trunk Line, C. F. A. territory, or some place else. So, that works no greater hardship on the owner if located in New England than if located some place else. You purchase enough cars to handle the business of your line. Now, with the falling off of the business there is not enough loading so that you can keep those cars off your line, any more than there is an ability on the part of the New England lines to keep the cars off their lines. Then, if there was any relation between the per diem and the average distance that a car moves per day, I am at a loss to understand what would happen in a case like that of the New York, Susquehanna & Western, making an average mileage of 4.6 miles per car per day. The purpose of per diem is to recompense the owner for the use of his car, and also to keep that car moving; and in time of stress in former years we did have what was known as a penalty. The owner could call upon the person having the car in his possession to return that car promptly; otherwise you would add a penalty over and above the per diem, in order to force the car to move. I recall when this subject of per diem was up in the American Railway Association, and the situa- tion which confronted us then was the fact that our cars got down into New England and did not get out, and the owner of the car was not getting the use of the car and was not getting paid for the car. Now, Mr. Pearson commented on the very big improvement which the New Haven has made in the last two years in the handling of embargoes and the effect that has had on their car situa- 69 tion. I think Mr. Pearson recognizes the necessity of protecting that situation as much as any one; but in former years they did not use it, and it was their failure to recognize it and the unfair use which the cars got on the New England lines that was really responsible for the adoption of per diem. One of the witnesses testified today to the clock arrangement they had on the Boston & Maine, I believe, for showing the improvement, and so forth, and I think they also testified to the fact that they had gotten up to 19 miles per car per day. All that I have suggested as to the New Haven was that the New Haven simply equal its former efforts in the handling of cars. I did not set up a theoretical performance, and if they make the same movement that they made in 1919, it will make a difference of $5,000,000 per year in per diem. Now, that is a matter in their hands. It is nota matter in the hands of the roads west of New England; and if they fail to save the $5,000,000 of per diem it should certainly be charged to them and not to us. Now, the Boston & Maine has not equaled the Boston & Albany in the past. It may be that they cannot quite approach these figures; but if they will equal anything like the performance that they have been making in the last two or three months, it will very materially reduce their per diem. And, on the other hand, the Boston & Maine, as I testified before, have reduced the number of cars something like 5,000 or 6,000. Of course, if they do not keep up their equipment, they are going to add very materially to their per diem cost; and I can well see how everybody will cease owning cars if the paying of the per diem permits you to increase your divisions, but 1 am quite at a loss to understand who is going to furnish the cars, because if you take it out of the divisions of the through rate—any sum of money—in order to pay any part of per diem, when under the present rate all it does is to recompense the owner for his expenditures for repairs, de- preciation and 6 per cent. on his money, you are not going to have anybody that will be willing to build any new cars. And, if I could get my cars on that kind of basis, I would certainly be perfectly willing to let any equipment I have today go on the scrap heap, because I would be money ahead. Now, as to the difference between the mileage rate and per diem, consideration must be given to the very heavy increase in car repairs. Some 8 to 10 years ago we figured on repairs to freight cars costing $40 to $60 per year. In my exhibit 142, showing the result of the consideration of per diem by the Railroad Exe- cutives, it shows an average cost per car of $227.21 for maintenance, $36.38 for depreciation, $8.08 for taxes and $64.01 for interest at 6 per cent. Now, just let us take out the interest for a moment, and you have $271.67 as out of pocket cost in the way of maintenance, depreciation and taxes; and I cannot see where the owner is going to break even with any hocus pocus that takes money away from him through a change in divisions. Now, Mr. Cunningham commented on my testimony with reference to passenger and freight service. I did not undertake to say that passenger service or freight service, either one, was pay- ing its way in New England. I do feel, however, that the passenger service in New England should pay its fair proportion of the operating cost, as well as its fair proportion of the investment necessary to handle the traffic; and when you bear in mind the difference in the capacity of your 70 line, bear in mind that the capacity of your line is first measured by trains, I think that as to the investment we could well divide the investment on the basis of trains. As to operating costs, I would not do it. As to the separation of costs as between less carloads and as between commodi- ties, it is possible to ascertain the average tonnage that is handled in the cars that are moving over the road for each kind of commodity, and whether it is carload or less than carload. Having as- certained the average tonnage per car, it is then possible to ascertain the quantity of paying load of each of those classes of traffic, whether it is carload, less than carload, or first class, second class, and so on, which can be handled by any given engine; and from that you can ascertain what your train earnings would be if it moved in solid train lots. Now, it makes no difference whether the coal moves over the Boston & Maine in train lots or whether it moves over the road in connection with something else. It requires for a given number of cars the same tractive power effort, whether it moves in solid trains or whether it moves in trains with other freight. So that that basis of dividing the cost would be fairly correct. It would certainly be as correct as any division between passenger and freight. When it comes to the coal business, while it is true that the earnings per train mile might show approximately the same as the earnings per train mile on other classes of freight—it does not as to all—you then find that, except for a very few exceptions, you have no return loading for your coal car. Now, that situation is not peculiar to New England; it is the same as to their con- nections. So, if you give consideration to the cost of taking these empty cars back to the mines, as against traffic moving in box cars, where the box car is loaded to a greater extent on the west- bound movement, you will find that the box car traffic will be better paying than the coal traffic, taking the movement of the engines and cars in the two directions and the tonnage that can be handled. Now, as to the switching, my use of the yard and train switching mileage: Mr. Cunningham testified that the ‘‘cars handled” was the controlling factor in the yard, rather than the relation of the road and yard locomotive freight switching mileage to the road freight locomotive mileage. I am very glad he has gone that far. I think I could meet him on common ground. I was object- ing to their use of ton miles, and used this as the only information which was available—they having not put in the record any information indicating the number of cars passing through the different yards and the cost of handling those cars. And it is of particular importance in giving consid- eration to the large volume of |. c. 1. traffic which the New England lines handled and which he said had a relatively light loading per car, because it costs just as much to handle that car through the yard, as nearly as it is possible to estimate it, as it does a car of coal or other freight. To some extent the tons have a slight effect, but it is so slight as to be ignored generally in operation. Now, as to the adjusted tonnage, I have answered the comments of Mr. Pearson. Mr. Cun- ningham testified that no road in New England uses adjusted tonnage. Prior to our use of it west of New England—and, as I have said, we have used it over 15 years—we did not get as good eco- nomical results as we have since we introduced the practice of adjusted tonnage. You cannot esti- mate it today, I am satisfied, with the varying capacity of your cars and of the loading. 71 Some reference was made by Mr. Cunningham to the inference that I thought might be drawn that there was some inefficiency in the operation of the New England lines. I do not recall any testimony to that effect; certainly it was not my intent in bringing out the exhibits that I did. I should want to feel entirely in touch with the operating conditions before I discussed the question of efficiency. What I did undertake to do was to put in some exhibits which would indicate the like- lihood that there was a considerable difference between plant facility in New England and plant facility outside of New England, and that by bringing their plant facility into harmony with ours they would probably bring their cost more nearly into harmony with ours. Mr. Newcomb: That is all. Mr. Choate: No questions. (Witness excused.) 72 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 130 NEW ENGLAND STATES POPULATION TAKEN FROM 1910 CENSUS RETURNS 25 miles 50 miles from from Coast}line. Coast line. Connecticut ............ DAVE T56. oe x cea Say TAN 810-. sew meeenes, deaecsad 1,080,507 Percentage... 64.75 Percentage.... .......... 96.93 Rhode Island ........... 542,610 ............. DBAMO2)> “wide Gaeie wakes Eebtoceaeece da 542,610 Percentage... 98.55 Percentage.... .......... 100.00 Massachusetts ........... 3,366,416 ............. THESIS awepeeekslesteue: 2 fapeeien 2,079,043 Percentage... 51.20 Percentage.... .......... 61.76 New Hampshire ......... 430/502... alana hctawies BO O84 cuss aGamses, Bain ecweals 246,088 Percentage... 19.44 Percentage.... ........-. 97.15 Maine: 2 cae pchade neste F42 301) veces esse soe 399.040 ae vekewienasa: nective tad 577,702 Percentage... 53.75 Percentage.... .......... 77.82 Total) a2cisiuacedeens 6,196,725 ...........6- 9483008 segereteecagegs Gieesea ee 4,525,950 Percentage... 56.21 Percentage.... .......--- 73.04 NEW ENGLAND STATES POPULATION 25 MILES FROM COAST LINE State. County. Connecticut.......... Fairfield ........ 245,822 Less New Fairfield ...............-..200005 551 Brookfield. sccsasaesaav ease weve ses 1,101 1,652 New Haven ...... 337,282 Less Wolcott ....... 0... ccc cee ee eee eee 563 Middlesex ....... 45,637 Cromwell. cccesct nage te tawe aon enes 2,188 New London .... 91,253 Add Windham County—Plainfield .......... 6,719 Rhode Island......... Washington ..... 24,942 Kent ........... 36,378 Providence ...... 424,353 Less Burrillville ................000 000000 7,878 Newport ........ 39,335 Bristol .......... 17,602 MIDDLESEX COUNTY. Massachusetts........ Plymouth ....... 144,387 Less Tyngsborough ...............00ee eee 829 Norfolk ......... 187,506 BSW. iis nada eae d die ue agi aes 885 Bristol .......... 318,573 Townsend) ¢ 2.0 .c4c06 65 ste eee ae cee 1,761 Middlesex ....... 669,915 PEP POrell ... ccaaiieearie weal ieae ad ee 1,282 Sweden s24ncanaydank cee ktews @eewesok 266 Waterford ....... ccc cece ee eee eee 934 NORWAY? hi Ghee do daa Saeed 3,002 PATS: dsccnadenne kay gia eeedoesd 3,436 Albany suscsawoei ne evi de eNee ee es 410 GreCHWOOG) 2 cade. adcend it xed e ene ae des 664 Buchtield: cisco erie sees hades sew eee was 1,087 Wooodstoch: acccca diac dala 808 Summer Hartford ..................5. 592 14,874 Sagadahoe ...... 18,574 Androscoggin .... 59,822 Lincoln ......... 18,216 Kn 0K: os c.cieieoen 28,981 Kennebec ....... 62,863 Waldo .......... 23,383 Penobscot ....... 85,285 Less PENOBSCOT. Mty (Chase: as 02) Acoceui boca gaciuahew de 227 Patton cca Rated heaetckleceire ce 1,406 Staceyville ...........000.0. 0.0 e ee eee 577 MO Way ont: sain alanis eaainadeeleicee 489 Woodville .......... 0... cee cee cee eee 125 Mattawamkeag ..................-00.. 517 OMNIA) - 40g. e lie we see ase eee ae gees 741 Drew cicexans is wfnieca eae ais said Ga eaten es 247 WATT a2 asses a dal bed oa i eee seat ences 655 Webster) <2 esis vas omer Se wee 103 PRONEISS 2 Seu) skeen y cys ise ase ecoteveleeGnals 472 Carrol: sou vaeck hice Rilo kee awe euler 472 Springfield ......... 0... cece cee eee 459 GEG. arch aeotad st ateica tee ncnaitend wis ake erat ae 748 Tiake vill €) cea wisetesesee Se sce iain el caca le al ivwce ae 96 TNNGOME Shes ewIGUesea eee aos ean 1,988 Burin gion sy ci0. pte eee daw ae ees 370 Garheld sccswse ese ie ae ian ies Gas 970 TRO WIA 25 ais ecttcancust a6ecsiauadacaciaw isd AG ae 494 MaCOheld’) s2n338.eeic mn ieieceeuean ids 719 Township 1-8) iwc. weactewtare encase 356 11,591 Hancock ........ 35,575 County. Washington ..... 42,905 Less Danforth ...............000 cece eee TOpSHEld 22.64 sive : tower Stiowe aces TRCOSSUEN) 1 2 ieee, tans foe dicen acre Seo Una t Codywille 6625cre ihe dol Saat eesti italtie HOPES seh bk tgs bonds aR am actriohe ay Ske tas Lambert Lake ..............00.00 0005 Add SOMERSET. Mercets. 222 aiciidet Ge eRe ed Smithhel @) song on eg tah pie wea ee ods Bartel: exc exes ewes Sac ani ouse ny cies Norridgewock ............ 000 cee eens Skowhegan ...............0 eee eee eee Cornville:.-3 Sesaw aware Rae ees eS Pittsheld: ssccceccac dalek se Aas Gale eee Par tland wis.d ooo rises eds wind eee PAY Pa aa iise odd ee re enacts ony St Albans: cosy vasocewca dee ee eee Harmony -i.cios. cn cdcakoan eter as Cambridge” 02 4.0. o00 509 ees Cee eee RECAPITULATION Add. Deduct. Connecticut ........ 0 .2.-eeee 245,322 18,762 337,282 15,487 70,260 45,637 34,249 250,182 91,253 26,459 48,361 1,114,756 34,249 1,080,507 Rhode Island ...........-.-.- 24,942 36,378 424,353 39,335 17,602 542,610 104 1,850 441 427 4,435 1,608 5,341 720 2,891 1,176 960 1,027 730 369 20,125 Massachusetts ............... New Hampshire ............. 399,657 144,337 187,506 318,573 669,915 436,477 2,156,465 17,422 2,079,043 126,072 52,188 38,951 217,211 39,335 256,546 10,458 246,088 68,526 112,014 18,574 59,822 18,216 28,981 62,863 23,383 85,285 35,575 42,905 556,144 34,999 591,143 13,441 577,702 Add. 29,904 4,141 5,290 39,335 Add. 14,874 20,125 34,999 717,422 Deduct. 10,458 Deduct. 11,591 1,850 13,441 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 131 pLIATEMENT SHOWING “FREIGHT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT’ (TONNAGE ORIGINATING ON ROAD) DURING THE YEAR 1918 BASED ON DATA CONTAINED IN “A PRELIMINARY ABSTRACT OF COMMON CARRIERS” FOR THE YEAR ee DECEMBER 61, 1918 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. New England Lines: Boston & Maine © ese @ ee eee 8 8 New York, New Haven & Hartiorad ... Central Vermont ........ Central New Emngland.... Rutland .....-.- Maine Central . Bangor & Aroostook .-..-- Total Per Cent .... @® ees ©@ ee @ eee 8 (a) Boston & Albany......... Lotal New Lines ..... Bastern Group (excl. England Lines) Per Cent .... Roads having England oes @eeee#e interchange wih New England Lines: Central Railroad of New Jersey ...... Delaware and Hudson ..-. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Erie (a) Greenwich & J ohnsonville Lehigh & New England. . Lehigh Valley . Long Island ... ee se@eeoeeee%### #8 *e; es © 8 6s 8 8s © 6 New York Central....... New York, Ontario & Western Pennsylvania . Ota] .....-. eeseeves se 8 8 *eeese ses e208 Per Cent .............. PRODUCTS OF 64.21% ieeell L. C. L. Goods Total Agriculture Animals Mines Forests Manutactories CT. Rates | ae 9,250,126 513,403 {a4,0T3 $75,007 1,935,107 2,209,090 1,169,105 1,030,035 11,055,401 316,109 405,963 3,049,864 405,165 2,001,101 1,9115359 2,106,470 1,022,670 66,726 2,180 215,036 103,461 293,464 20,026 135,272 265,211 16,590 4,107 26,056 45,676 69,205 46,619 56,424 676,437 93,105 29,497 239,006 160,341 99,158; ~— 53,200 - 3,889,258 265,911 50,500 125,561 1,941,270 15306,569 12,010 520,001 1,557,920 301,220 4,956 137,836 659,090 215,095 3o,901 29,990 27,695,089 1,917,307 15262, 79 4,514,168 4,886,415 6,911,166 5,001,000 4,042,213 100.00% 6.92% 4.56% 17.38% 17.64% 24.95% 18.94% 14.60% 2,024,089 122,275 133,564 443,831 95,545 1,512,463 _ 230,193 176,870 50,519,618 2,039,632 1,445,943 5,200,049 4,951,158 3,200,020 4,091,579 4°219,088 100.007 6.13% 4.11% 17.34% 16.43% Al.on% 13.49% 13.92% 694,670,325 | 23,159,060 | 10)475,296 | 434,331,281 | 18,180,456 | 110,503,682 28,220,421 24,164,521 100.00% 4.51% 1.60% 66.34% 2.19% 16.38% £51% B:10% 15,784,811 250,405 113,217 3,948,463 165,571 5,071,889 | 3,209,201 | 4... 14,230,358 168,217 15,993 11,347,613 115,017 1,216,035 j1a,2U0e 294,780 13,119,180 566,007 127,187 15,986,283 233,405 2,298,011 1,089,964 473,093 20,054,126 991,048 211,444 11,431,498 Dba,000 4,168,694 15720,669 $14,078 67,173 1,018 4.505 228 5,150 47,919 1,079 - 3,119 5,474,406 14499 108 4°528,916 5D,598 600,416 63,695 5,214 21,113,537 650,832 129,791 16,295,922 196,710 2,094,836 1,114,075 639,021 1,966,431 218, 1o3 193,623 230,160 141,404 AQOT,222 138,273 184,996 _ 40,582,106 5,013,106 4,500,645 15,939,590 1,606,957 15,567,012 1,439,128 1,069,420 7 8,127,285 92,288 45,152 2,020,198) 214,608 203,128 45,087 Boot 109,219,959 2,018,697 1,603,305 q 4, 690, 683 3,200,002 17,423,033 3,991,000 6,447,262 250,005,463 9,078,070 0,016,620 | 160,519,314 6,471,982 47,292,695 12,827,592 9,995,680 100.00% 3.023% 1.538% 2.09% 18.91% 5.13% 4.00%, (a) Purnished by carriers. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 132 STATEMENT SHOWING ROAD FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE MILES AND TRAIN SWITCHING AND YARD SWITCHING LOCOMOTIVE MILES, FREIGHT, DURING THE YEAR 1918 BASED ON DATA CONTAINED IN “A PRE- LIMINARY EXTRACT OF STATISTICS OF COMMON CARRIERS” FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1918—INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. (E) Per Cent. of (A) (C) TotalB& C Road (B) Yard (D) to Freight Train Switching Total Road Freight (1) NEW ENGLAND LINES: Loco. Miles Switching Freight Band C Loco. Miles Boston & Maine.............0.eeeeeeeeeeees 10,165,625 652,057 4,916,977 5,569,034 New York, New Haven & Hartford.......... 7,783,040 1,165,884 5,518,463 6,684,347 Central Vermont ....... aul ie een ee 817,509 226,252 396,839 623,091 Central New England...............00ee00+ 1,197,470 64,689 378,027 442,716 Rutlatid. «4 ese cag cces hs cvacee deat acne ewe 811,000 74,375 294,754 869,129 Maine Central ............ 0. cece cee eee eees 2,707,454 462,116 895,434 1,357,550 Bangor & Aroostook..........0:ceeeeeeeeee 842,717 193,167 252,847 446,014 (a) Boston & Albany............ 0. cee eee eee eee 4,482,384 549,203 1,792,871 2,842,074 TLOtal eects cee eerns Bk Qe naan he eA 28,807,199 3,387,743 14,446,212 17,833,955 61.91% (2) EASTERN GROUP (excl. New England TEINS): hack cacSsen tak ete Meese wus emae wake 305,106,485 25,169,151 185,423,708 | 207,781,265 68.10% (3) ROADS HAVING INTERCHANGE WITH - NEW ENGLAND LINES: Central Railroad of New Jersey............. 5,276,798 784,504 3,604,160 4,388,664 Delaware and Hudson.................+--0+ 7,846,852 588,911 | (a)2,414,590 3,008,501 - Delaware, Lackawanna & Western.......... 10,305,881 356,351 4,981,671 5,838,022 PIT IG sil. 5 ech wos hace cca teeiaaly Sapna Sawa ares 13,467,612 766,904 6,821,014 7,587,918 (a) Greenwich & Johnsonville.................. 22,062 12,2241) ee aene 12,224 Lehigh & New England................006. 617,997 881,261 199,123 580,384 Lehigh Valley .............ccccec cece eeeees 9,945,591 | =... 6,055,596 6,055,596 Long Islan) os..cs06sdeseseee ea een ce wew ars 1,064,950 265,143 862,401 1,127,544 New York Central............... cece cence 37,044,104 8,777,814 25,208,351 28,981,165 New York, Ontario & Western.............. 1,931,108 93,204 519,842 613,046 Pennsylvania ..........0 cc cece cece eee eeee 45,260,026 5,049,065 82,336,690 37,385,755 Total: Eatentets Sek be as wea ee 182,782,981 12,075,381 82,998,438 95,073,819 71.60% (a) Furnished by carrier, W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 133 STATEMENT SHOWING MILES OF ROAD OPERATED DURING THE YEAR 1918 BASED ON DATA CONTAINED IN “A PRE- LIMINARY ABSTRACT OF STATISTICS OF COMMON CARRIERS” FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1918—INTER- STATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. (F) Per Cent. (G) (D) (E) Yard and Per Cent. (A) (B) (C) Yard and Total All Sidings Yard and 1st All Other Total Main All Side All to Total All Sidings Main Main Tracks Tracks Tracks Main Tracks to 1st Main (1) NEW ENGLAND LINES: Boston & Maine................... 2,258.61 598.05 2,856.66 1,376.93 4,233.59 New York, New Haven & Hartford. 1,992.15 1,073.15 3,065.30 1,577.35 4,642.65 Central Vermont .................. 411.20 6.20 417.40 160.01 577.41 Central New England.............. 301.30 79.71 381.01 161.69 542.70 RUtANG? (od acids wea we eee ee ees 415.11 sactie A15.11 132.79 547.90 Maine Central .................... 1,216.16 86.22 1,302.38 3884.29 1,686.67 Bangor & Aroostook ....... ....... 632.35 30.29 662.64 219.33 881.97 (a) Boston & Albany.................. 393.97 329.76 723.73 412.57 1,136.30 Total cios63eweadeas pict wayena 2 ae 7,620.85 2,203.38 9,824.23 4,424.96 14,249.19 45.04% 58.06% (2) EASTERN GROUP (Excl: New England Lines) ................ 56,218.13 20,385.92 76,607.05 40,176.24 116,780.29 52.45% 71.46% (83) ROADS HAVING INTERCHANGE WITH NEW ENGLAND LINES: Central Railroad of New Jersey.... 685.02 341.11 1,026.13 852.71 1,878.84 Delaware and Hudson .... ....... 909.61 409.81 1,319.42 643.18 1,962.60 Delaware, Lackawanna & Western. ' 955.09 664.95 1,620.04 1,006.80 2,626.84 PHIVIOR ct cesnee noe Saisie ante asthe senue oh ates 1,989.12 1,029.72 3,018.84 1,693.16 4,712.00 (b) Greenwich & Johnsonville.......... 21.15 ae 21.15 4,35 25.50 Lehigh & New England............ 224.88 7.15 232.03 109.11 341.14 Lehigh Valley .............0.00000. 1,436.14 744.52 2,180.66 1,290.26 3,470.92 Long Island......... t erahsteroragteutnaheved 398.38 234.26 632.64 298.91 931.55 New York Central................. 6,075.79 3,984.11 10,059.90 5,238.24 15,298.14 New York, Ontario & Western..... 569.49 207.40 776.89 279.83 1,056.72 Pennsylvania ............ 000 eevee 5,360.57 3,108.64 8,469.21 5,147.00 13,616.21 TLOtall sees et obi hs eh hh ees : 18,625.24 10,731.67 29,356.91 16,563.55 45,920.46 56.42% 88.98% (a) Taken from New Central Annual Report. (b) Furnished by carrier. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 134 Statement showing, average number of Manufacturing Establishments per mile of road, (a) taken from page 57, Vol. 8 (1910) 13th Census of the United States. (a) Manufacturing Average Per Miles oF Road Establishments Mile of Road NEW ENGLAND Massachusetts 11,684 2,115 Maine 1 3,046 2,240 New Hampshire 1961 1,243 Vermont. 1,958 1,100 Rhode Island 1,951 212 Connecticut 4,201 1,000 Total 20,301 7,920 3.201 “MIDDLE ATLANTIC New York, 44,930 3,420 New Jersey 0 8,517 2,260 Pennsylvania... 21,060 11,209 Total. 41,319 21,895 3.200 EAS? NORTH CENTRAL Ohio 15,138 9,134 Indiana 7,969 7,420 Ilnois 13,026 11,378 Michigan 9;159 9,021 Total 30,292 37,400 1343 OTHER Delaware 2000... 126 voe Maryland 4,837 1,426 Total 0,003 1,760 3. 161 ) W. H. WILLIAMS EXHIBIT No. 135 FREIGHT TRAIN AND FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE SHEET NO. 1 (Mixed and Special Trains not included) TWELVE MONTHS, JANUARY 1, 1919 TO DECEMBER 31, 1919 Compiled from Monthly Statistics of United States Railroad Administration (Series O. S. 1—3) TRAIN PERFORMANCE LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE | : Train Speed Net Ton Miles Per cent. Net Per cent. Loaded Net Ton Miles Gross Ton Miles Per cent. Gross Per cent. L i REGIONS Net ook Mules ean pe per Ton Miles to Car Miles to per per Ton Miles to "Miles to Ficieht Locomotives Miles Te D Niles Pounds of Coal Train Hour Miles per Hour Train Mile Gross Ton Miles Total Car Miles Loaded Car Mile Train Mile Rating Ton Miles Train Miles _ per | M jles per Tons per ; | Total} per Total | of Coal , % Un-| Loco. | Loco. . East | West | Total | East | West | Total} East West |-Total | East | West | Total vat we" Tom East | West | Total | East | West | Total | East | West | Total Fast wert "on Service- Total service Day Mil Dae Consumed Toco . nd? on ane | & (z) | Miles er ee 4,640 10.6 436 1.... | .... | 45.3] .... | ..-. | 70.74 0... ] 000. | M4.0P | ee | O68 P| ee | O64 PP, 107.1] 1,094.5 | 1,422.9 | 23.1 | 48. JAN. Tota Oe veecccauaf canes | eeeee 7,975 10.5 791... |... | 47.51... | owe. | 64.8 Foe. | eee | O89 | lll | ee. fab90 P| ee | BOP Lp lll, 113.1 | 3982.7 | 5,306.3 | 24.9 53.9 1,399 3381 1,149°996 580 198 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........P..--- | soe 7,163 10.2 700} 22 | Lil) page cl] cle fea ee] oe. | 80.0 fp. pratt fe POOP pee! 105.7 | 787.6 | 1,026.3 | 23.3] 46.3} 1,315 | 30,244 | ‘198/916 | 270 208 9.1 7551 ....|.... | 51.4)... |... | 62.44... 1] 0... | 84.5} 0. do. | 1400 Pe Pe. |) OO.7 PP oe. 114. ToPAl, Auten EP | | 9r 971 ee be RTP ce ccc g0cd | fi gots Pc pis fogs | pics pes Ps pce 121.8 | .'886.7 | 12aa'4 | 28:1 | 58:2 | 1580 | aa'oo0 | Vasr'tss | 399 | ars TorAaL, SOUTHERN REGION.........-0f e.0-- | eee 5,704 10.9 505 |... 1 2... | 46.64 .... | occ. | 67-8 Foes | eee | QOS PP faa) fe | 68.8 ple, 104.7 | 3,031.0 | 3,945.3 | 23.2 | 60.2} 1,049 | 291471 | 934/657 | 254 ot 2. | 6,755 10.8 e271 .... | .... | 48.44 ....] 0... | 67.74 0... | 0. | O75 Pe dee. [1,206 Pee poe | 62.8 P Poe, 105. , . ; Torat, Non Wnsrmnn REGION... | v0... | css. 7376 11.7 poe fio PLES Para fo Paw PS | fag PS ] fargas PP fag P| 106.7 | 3396.7 | sioat.a | 28:7 | 63.4] Live | sevoor | uersitee aes | ae TorAaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......[ ...-. | -++- 5,174 10.3 BOL | 1 ll. | 460} 2.22 | cic. | 704d ee | ee. | 25.0 Fo do... 1088 Pe. | P O72 Pp oe. 101.5 | 1,638.2 | 2,269.5 | 27.8 | 60.2} 1,046 | 29,009 | 509,659 | 241 | 230 Granp Tovat, ALL REGIONS..........f 0... | eee. 6,817 10.4 663 |....|....|48.4].... | .... | 66.42] 0... ] 00. | 29.0P 000] 0... faa4ao fo fe. P68. BP pe. 108.6 | 22,173.2 |30,070.6 | 26.3 | 56.9} 1,176 | 32,374 | 6,934,586 | 2621 228 NEW ENGLAND ROADS , : ‘Bangor & Aroostook...........00ee08- 4507 | 3.2581 10.61 9.5| 10.0] 158| 486| 327 | 26.1 | 49.4 | 40.9 | 30.2 | 91.5 | 50.0 | 18.7 | 22.8 | 21.7] 604] 984} 799 | 54.8 | 58.8 | 57.3 | 103.3 | 101.0 | 102.2 32.5 43.8 | 25. . Boson & Albee ieee 77659 5°309 | 32444 | 11.7 | 16.2 | 13:6] 657 | 142| 402 | 55.5 | 23.2 | 44.6 | 98-4 | 43.3 | 72.5 | 25.6 | 14.1 | 22.4 11,185 | 612 | 901 | 87.3 | 52.7 | 71.5 | 107.2 | 106.6 | 106.9] 137.5 163.0 15.6 65.0 138 21967 09386 17 336 Boston & Maine........ 2s sc sssveee. 931 | 2'790 | 4528) 10.4 | 10.8| 10.6) 509] 260) 428 | 51.8 | 32.0 | 43.6 | 89.4 | 54.3 | 72.1 | 25.8 | 19.2 | 23.4 11,156 | 810 | 982 74.6 | 66.2 | 70.9] 115.0 | 108.6] 111.8] 345.0] 471.0 | 26.8 | 49.8 815 | 17,672 | 69,047 | 190 | 233 , 5751 9.11 10.31 9.711,214| 146| 680] 65.3 | 16.7 | 49.7 | 98.8 | 21.3 | 58.4 | 37.0 | 18.9 | 33.6 |1,859 | 876 | 1,368 | 68.3 | 66.2 | 67.6 | 111.5 | 101.8 | 106.6 38. 53. . Central New Buganesc tit Monee 672 27549 37169 10.81 9:9 | 10.41 7155 | 459 | 306 | 29.5 | 47.4 | 41.1 | 43.7 | 94.2 | 72.4 | 19.0 | 19.8 | 19.6 | 525 | 968 | 745 | 48.2 | 86.8 | 67.7 | 100.0 | 102.5 | 101.3 37 4 46.9 | 20.3 30.5 "796 | 15046 0730 | 265 368 Grand Trunk Lines in New England...| 8,642 | 1,536 | 5,087 | 10.3 | 10.5 | 10.4] 839] 147 | 490 | 60.3 19.8 | 46.0 | 98:1 | 20.0 | 57.3 | 30.9 | 24.8 | 20.8 | 1,302 | 744 | 1,066 | 63.6 | 55.6 | 60.5 | 101.2 | 100.8 | 101.0 25.0 30.0 | 16.7 | 72.5 1 1,046 | 34.884 7,641 | 227 | 217 - 4 3631 110.41 10.4|10.4| 290] 406| 349 | 38.2 | 47.7 | 43.3 | 46.6 | 79.5 | 62.9 | 25.7 | 22.5 | 23.7} 759] 850] 806 | 58.4 | 61.8 | 60.2 | 101.1 | 103.9 | 102.5 85.0] 115.0 | 26.1 | 64. Res oa New Haven & Hartford... 87703 2072 #392 | 9.7 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 688] 290| 490 | 56.8 | 35.1 | 48:0 | 92.5 | 59-8 | 76.3 | 27-8 | 18.3 | 24.1 ]1,212 | 826 /1,020 | 74.0 | 52.3 | 63.4 | 106.5 | 104.3 | 105.4] 361.5 | 463.7 590 37.0 04 16/032 58,470 209 531 Rutland..........csssescereceeeeesef 5,875 | 3,015 | 4,871 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 618 | 426 521 | 54.9 | 44.0 | 49.8 | 94.2 | 70.7 | 82.1 | 25.8 | 22.5 | 24.3 [1,127 | 968 | 1,047 | 65.1 | 57.6 | 61.4 | 114.0 | 110.3 | 112.1 32.0 36.0 | 11.1 | 36.3 876 | 15,858 4,595 | 227] 259 Toray New ENGLAND DISTRICT....f) ..... | e+ee- 4,640 10.6 4361 .... | .... | 45.3] .... | 2... | 70.7 24.0} ....].... 9638 } .... | .... | 66.4 ..... J oo... 107.1 | 1,094.5 | 1,422.9 | 23.1 | 48.7 842 | 18,559 219,832 || 205 243 aL, New ENGLAND Disrrtcr.......J..... |... 4,829 10.7 451) .... | .... | 44.4] .... |... | 70-4 23.4) .... 1.2... }1016} .... | 0... | 9.0 fF doo. 107.6 | 1,077.9 | 1,882.7 | 22. . BEB. Tote. ee Doe ce | veeee 87349 11.2 7481... | .... | 45.6] .... | .... | 65.0 26.6] .... | .... {1,689} ....].... | 61.0] ..... :.... | 113.0 | 3'914.9 | 5,342.7 36.7 471 1,362 oar 307063 oes rr Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........J ...-. | o--: 7,486 10.4 718 | ....|.... | 49.8] .... |] .... | 66.6 29.2} 0... ] 0... {4457} 00.0 | 002. | OB. 2b ble. 105.2} (810.8 | 1,045.1 | 22.4] 41.0] 1,368 | 27.647 | 1571421 | 263] 192 | veeee 0 9.6 763 | .... | .... | 50.4.0... |... | 61.9 33.21 ....].... [1,622 } 0...) 0... | 68.0 F oo. dol. 114.1 | 3,804.4 | 5,488.9 | 30. . TOTAL, AEGEAN EOIN ec, pa. ard 9.2 1,100 | 2... | ccc. | 54.2] 0... | oe | 62.8 39.6] .... | .... {2082} ....] 2... | 72.29 ..... } oo. 122.4} '834.8 | 1,211.6 ald 204 1503 13/454 372 46S 319 300 ToraL, SOUTHERN REGION......-..00-f oeeee | vee 6,064 11.0 550 | .... | .... | 47.0] .... |... | 69.9 25.9) ....].... | 2170} .... |... | 74d. | oo. 104.8 | 3,017.0 | 3,862.2 | 21.9] 62.3] 1,089 | 31,859 | 828266 | 246 | 226 | Lieas 21 10.8 623 | .... | .... | 48.6] .... | -... | 72.6 26.21 .... | 2... {1,283 Jo... fo... | Ob.3 Po... | eee. 105.2 | 3,209.2 | 4,301.7 | 25.4 | 48. Toran Bae ae cen REGION. -.. dia. 046 11.8 637 |... | 2... | 46.74... | .... | 70.0 26.2] 0.0.) 002. 10868 fo... | oP O74 py oe. 106.4 | 3,459.5 | 5,020.9 | 31.1 50.9 1201 33/640 1107385 oes a9 ToraL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION......-f .-.-- J seeee 5,217 10.4 503 | .... | .-.. | 45.6] .... |... | 70.2 24.7} .... | .... [1,105 Jo... |... | 68.8 Fo... do... 101.7 | 1,656.9 | 2,272.2 | 27.1 | 62.1 | 1,065 | 30,104 | 463,555 || 235 221 Granp Toran, ALL REGIONS........--Poo.e06 J cee es 7,025 10.7 656 47.7 67.4 27.8 1375] .... | 0... | 65.89 0.0.0 foo. 108.3 | 21,785.4 |29,928.0 | 27.2 | 52.9] 1,204 | 30,426 | 5,747,989 | 250] 215 NEW ENGLAND ROADS : | | Se ceaeeeees 4666 | 3375 | 10.6} 9.2| 9.9} 175| 505| 341 | 24.3 | 49.7 | 39.2 | 38.2 | 84.2 | 61.7 | 18.5 | 23.4 | 21.9 | 722 |1,016 | 870 | 63.4 | 60.3 | 61.5 | 104.2 | 103.5 | 103.8 32.0 43.2 | 25.9 | 47.2 09 | 14,9 Boson & Alby ccc aaceneeuues 2003 son | 2710 | 12.2 | 15.2 | 13.6) 655] 184| 421 | 53.4 | 24.2 | 42°3 | 98.4 | 45.2 | 71.4 | 24.2 | 14.3 | 21.0 | 1,226 | 760 | 995 | 89.0 | 58.9 | 74.5 | 106.8 | 108.0 | 107.4) 126.9 | 162.0 21.7 1444.6 829 19164 of 384 196 356 Boston & Maine.........ssss000eee 6484 | 31043 | 4,760 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 625 | 285 | 452 | 51.6 | 33.6 | 44.1] 89.7 | 58.6 74.5 | 25.4 | 19.1 | 23.0 1,210 | 849 |1,027 | 77.7 | 68.6 | 73.6 | 115.8 | 109.6 | 112.7] 337.0 | 451.0 | 25.3 | 45.7 844 1 16.992 | 55,997] 1941 230 . 65041 9.6 | 11.7| 10.611,143 | 131| 615 | 63.6 | 13.7 | 45.3 | 97.9 | 18.6 | 52.0 | 35.9 | 17.2 | 32.0 [1,797 | 954 | 1,357 | 67.7 | 73.2 | 69.6 | 112.8 | 100.0 | 106.2 40.4 51.7 | 21.91 44.5] 1,16 : Contre New England..-+--00rvrr "2007 27183 3160 | 9.3| 9.4| 9.3] 225| 447] 338 | 32.8 | 46.6 | 41.0 | 50.2 | 93.9 | 73.2 | 20.1 | 20.0 | 20.0 685 | 959 | 825 | 61.2 | 85.0] 73.4 4 101.0 | 102.6 | 101.9 36.1 45.6 | 20.8 | 44.3 789 12315 4b 364 334 Cennd Tronk Lines in New England... .] 8,681 | 2,143 | 5,457 | 10.8 | 11.7] 11.2] 802 | 184 | 486 | 57.9 | 22.4 | 44.3 | 95.9 21.5 | 55.9 | 29.1 | 26.8 | 28.6 | 1,386 | 819 | 1,096 | 62.1 | 56.7 | 59.9 | 101.1 | 101.0 | 101.1 25.0 31.0] 19.41 52.9] 1,045 | 24,520 4353 | 211 | 202 ine Central..........0020eeeeeeee “Voo7a | asos | 3,922 10.9 | 10.3| 10.6| 273| 466| 370 | 39.1 | 48.4 | 44.5 | 52.9 | 78.3 | 66.6 | 24.4 | 24.4) 24.4] 608] 962) 831 | 53.5 | 67.1 | 60.7 | 102.3 | 106.3 | 104.3 — 86.0| 112.0 | 23.2 | 64.0 781 | 22,265 19,127} 191] 244 Mains oa New Haven & Hariford....| 7'222 | 3069 | 3,158 | 10:1 | 10.4 | 10.2] 718 | 296 | 505 | 56.7 | 32.0 | 46.2 | 91.7 | 53.8 | 71.5 | 27.8 17.6 | 23.8 11,265 | 923 | 1,093 | 75.5 | 59.3 | 67.71 107.0 | 104.3 | 105.6 | 364.5] 451.2 | 19.2 } 36.8 963 | 16,373 | 48,776] 210] 218 Rutland... .....-.eecceeee eee r neers 4976 | 3.925 | 4,447| 9.8| 9.7| 9.8] 508 | 403] 455 | 50.6 | 43.9 | 47.4 | 88.9 | 73-8 | 81.3 | 22.9 21.6 | 22.3 11,003 | 919 | 960 | 61.6 | 56.4 | 59.0 | 103.4 | 109.1 | 106.3 30.0 35.0 | 14.3 | 34.7 866 | 14,248 3,628 | 213 | 246 Torat New ENGLAND DISTRICT....f ..... | -e-e 4,829 10.7 451 44.4 70.4 23.4 1,016 | .... | .... | 69.09 ..... 7 ..... 107.6 | 1,077.9 | 1,882.7 | 22.0 | 45.2 881 | 17,663 181,295 |} 207 235 ) 3 4 11.0 456 44.1 72.7] .... |...) 22.3.0... 2... |1,084 fo... Po P05 Po po, 107.1 | 1,049.4 | 1,378.7 | 23.9 | 42.7 7 MARCH | otal Catal Dette SPD poe. 3729 11.0 796 46.1 66.7] .... |... | 26.67 0.07 00. 44725 Po fl] oe Po pee. 111.5 | 3,966.0 | 5,416.8 | 26.8 | 44.2 1,452 29'385 999950 2491 i71 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........J..... | ----- 7,796 10.3 758 49.3 66.8] .... | .... | 29.0] 0... fo... [2680 Poe Po. | O61 pe Pe. 105.31 7806.1 | 1,062.4 | 24.1] 40.9] 1,441 | 29026] 170,817] 2541 176 | ... | 8,16 9.7 saa ....|.... | ba.7].... | 2... | 65.24 0.0] 0... | 8R4 PP ee. 11,680 Pe fe | 66.2 Pp ee, 114.4] 3,729.3 | 5,510.1 | 32.3] 47.6] 1,316" eee acre as BOSON ccc dee 10°883 9.3 1170 | 122 | Lill | bala pce fee | 9B Pe | ee P44 Pe oe. 21621 ....|.... | 74.79 ..... | 0... 122.5] °841.5| 1,222.4] 31.2] 48.6] 1,697 TP eat 3B’ O86 308 180 | Doran, Sourmmrn REGION............ 00... | iii. | 6,140 |... 11.1 | p55 | 1... | 1) | 46.3) .... | [694] ieee |e. | 254 | | ee. fatoo | | | Z| | 104.5 | 2,886.0 | 3,839.3 | 24.81 58.6] 1,119} 30,348] 857,973 | 246 | 220 Torat, NoRTHWESTERN REGION....... bee, we. | Zord.... |... | 1067 2... [oP 675 7 | ww. | 49.9 oe | 72.8 26.6 | 1.370 | . : Tora, Canmma Westen Region...) 20.0. | 20.1) Fags P20 | 2 PaO PP Peak Poo] Paws pee | fob PL] pass SSP figato | SSL] of eet PS PITY aoa | apse a B018.3 | 29.2 | 87.9 | 1'240 | 33°008 | 1,166°727 | 259 | 200 Torar, Sourawestann REGION....+-[ ---+ | ----- STD Pao po pie | saad iil pill fp aace PD bill bez doc | ool. pated ool poll. pagaz dl | oll pb mma dic do. “* | 101.3 | 1590.8 | 2,240.6 | 29.0 | 57.6} 1,109 | 28,495 | 461,016 | 231 | 208 Granp Toran, ALL REcions.......f..... | ..--- 74451 ....{....{ 10.8] ....] 0... | e92] 0... 7 0...) 47.9] 200. | oo. | 68.0 27.7 1,444] ....] 0... | 67.8 > ..... | 0... 108.0 121,623 .2 | 29,987.8 | 27.9] 51.0] 1,269 | 31,005 | 5,936,664 | 250} 197 NEW ENGLAND ROADS | Bangor & Aroostook.............0000: 1,942 | 5,049 | 3,577] 10.2] 9.6| 9.9] 191 | 527] 363 | 26.6 | 46.7 | 39.1 | 42.8 | 82.6 | 65.0 | 18.9 | 22.4] 21.4] 719 |1,129 | 928 | 70.2 | 78.8 | 75.3 | 103.2 | 101.4 | 102.3 1 42.3 | 25.8 | 43 Boston & Albany................005- g'o12 | 21856 | 5,824] 12.6 | 15.2 | 13-8] 653| 187] 423 | 53.6 | 23.8 | 42.1 | 98.2 | 48.2 | 72.6 | 24.2 | 13.2 | 20.4 | 1,218 | "786 | 1,005 | 87.8 | 61.0 | 75.1 | 106.7 | 107.8 | 107.3 131.0 | 150.0 | 17.6 sto | 843 18150 04°331 93 | 229 Boston & Maine........ leeeeeauetees 6943 | 3126 | 5,065 | 10.4| 11.0 | 10.7] 666] 285| 474 | 52:0 | 32.8 | 44.1 | 91.0 | 59.5 | 75.8 | 25.4 | 18.1 | 22.6 | 1,280 | 871 | 1,073 | 81.1 | 69.9 | 76.1 | 116.0 | 109.3 | 112.6 | 323.0] 440.0} 26.6 | 45.1 873 | 17,361} 55,618 | 181 | 207 Central New England................ 10,857 | 2,377 | 6,740 | 11.1 | 12.5] 11.8] 979 | 190] 573 | 62.4 | 19.8 | 45.6 | 97.5 | 27.5 | 58.0 | 33.2 | 18.7 | 29.3 |1,569 | 959 | 1,255 | 59.4 | 74.5 | 64.6 | 112.9 | 1 1 } Central Vermont..........0....0 006 2'309 | 3'809 | 3,060 | 9.2] 9.3| 9.2] 251] 411] 332} 33.8 | 45.3 | 40.2 | 50.2 | 94.0 | 71.8 | 20.4 | 18.6] 19.2] 744] 907 | 326 | 69.0 | 79.8 46 | 100.2 | tore | 100.9] 33:2) 4r-7 | 30.4 | 39.8 | ’s01 | 12'705 | 7'500 57 | 321 Grand Trunk Lines in New England. ..} 12,009 | 1,631 | 7,068 | 11.9 | 12.5 | 12.2 1,018 | 130 | 580 | 61.1 | 17.2 | 47:6 | 97.6 | 16.9 | 58.2 | 32.2 | 24.3 | 31.0] 1,665 | 760 | 1,218 | 77.8 | 54.7 | 68.9 | 100.0 | 100.8 | 100.4 23.0 32.0 | 28.1] 59.6 | 1,191 | 33,759 5488 | 186 | 156 Maine Central........... 0.002.000 00: 2.957 | 5,577 | 4,343 | 11.3 | 10.6 | 10.9] 261 | 527 | 397 | 37.5 | 49.5 | 44.9 | 55.0 | 83.5 | 71.5 | 21.7 | 22.1 | 22.0] 696 [1,065 | 885 | 51.6 | 73.6 | 63.3 | 104.2 | 1 1 14.0 ! New York, New Haven & Hartford....| 6,298 | 3,652 | 4,971 | 10.4] 10.6 | 10.5} 604| 343 | 472 | 52.4 | 35.6 | 44.6 | 88.8 | 63.1 | 75.0 | 24.8 | 17.6 | 21.5 |1,153 | 964 | 1,057 70.5 | 63.7 | 67.2 | 104.8 102.9 103.8 3440 452.0 33°9 33 6 042 atid 46°509 198 310 Rutland... ........ 0 eee ee cece eee ees 4947 | 3,471 | 4.2271 9.5| 9.9] 9.7] 518] 351 | 435 | 50.0 | 41.2 | 46.1 | 88.5 | 73.3 | 81.1 | 22.7 | 19.3 | 21.2 11,036 | 852 | ‘945 | 63.3 | 50.9 | 57.0 | 105.0 | 105.9 | 105.5 31.8 34.7] 8.4] 34.6 865 | 13,778 3,664 | 197} 228 Tota New ENGLAND DIsTRICT....f ..... | ..... 5,004 11.2 456 er wee 44.1 sees . 72.7 22.3 1,034 70.5 107.1 1.049 .4 1.378.7 1 23.9 | 42.7 897 16.875 177.014 | 194 oe | 72. 2. cece ficeee | TO5P .. | oo. . 049. 378. . 216 APRIL | Toran, New Eneuanp District.......f 2.6... | sees 5,498 Wi. 496 | .... | .... | 40.0] .... | .... | 72.2 23.4 F102 ee. | eee | TAD P | oe, ! Total, Central District...........000-f eee. | veers 8,962 10.9 gaa] .... | .... | 46.1] .... | .... | 67.1 26.5 1,787 | .... | .... | 68.3 1395-3 | Poe0'9 | saso-4 | 96-1 | 43°8 955 | 19,308 | Oa Laue | 165 antral T ee, 8,962 10-2 737}... |... | O8.B P| wee. 2.1} 4,050.9 | 5,480.4 | 26.11 43.8} 1,490} 30,098 | 885,932} 246] 165 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f)..... | --+-- ; 797 | .... | .... | 50.1].... | .... | 68.0 29.6 1591} 0.0] 0...) 67.0F ..00. | oe, 104.8] °774.9]| 1,045.1} 25.9] 42.9] 1,490 | 32,014 | 164,768 | 245 | 164 Tora, ALLEGHANY REGION..........-f -.026 | ceeee 8,584 9.8 878} .... | .... | SLS Fw... | we. | 64.8 33.5 1,705 |} .... 10... Foran puonowuy Renee Pere [orn om as a8 [fe Bal | | 88 3. prog) Pon Pang pon [on uge| seins | sa0-4 [35-7 [9] 1ars | asoee | guage | ase | a8 ToTAL, SOUTHERN REGION..........--f) cece | ween 6,431 11.2 572} .... | oe. | 46-49 0... | ee. | LO 25.0 1,232 edo yd "200. , , , , | ; cece duces | TBO | ooo. 104.0 | 2,920.7 | 3,820.8 | 23.6 | 60.1 | 1,156 | 32,276 | 806,007 | 234 | 202 TotaL, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......] ..... Joseeee 7,397 10.8 eee | 684] .... | .... | 48.0] .... [ 0... | 70.1 26.0 1425} ....].... Tora, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION... veces | veeee 7,740 11.9 wee | GLY L... | ee. | 46.8 Powe. | eee | 70.7 24.6 1,437 veces | oveee 71.9 vevee [cess 106.3 37502. 3 5050.9 58.9 545 1362 31 192 1,088°716 a5 199 ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......} ...-. | s-+-+ 5,483 10.8 506 | .... | «2... | 48.5] .... | .... | 65.8 24.2 1,165 | .... | .... | 72.6 oo... | wee. 101.1 | 1,660.4 | 2,317.5 | 28.4 | 59.4] 1,130 | 29,166 | 446,627} 216 | 191 Granp Toran, Att Ruaions..........f ..... | -eee- 7,660 10.8 708 | .... | .... | 47.6] .... | 2... | 68.0 27.3 1488} 0... ] 0... | 70.5] 0.... ] 00... 107.9 | 21,809.8 | 30,330.1 | 28.2 | 50.3} 1,307 | 31,296 | 5,543,183 | 242 | 185 NEW ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostook...........000000- 2,576 | 5,304 | 4,002 | 10.8} 9.9] 10.3 | 238] 538 | 388 | 30.9 | 47.0 | 40.5 | 50.0 | 87.4 | 70.0] 19.3 | 21.6 | 20.8] 771 |1,144 | 957 | 79.0 | 70.4 | 73.6 | 101.9 | 101.3 | 101.6 27.9 42.4 | 34.2 | 37.6 g21 | 14,0451 43501182] 197 Boston & Albany.............00ee08- 3'561 | 2'800 | 6,048 | 12.1 | 15.5] 13.6 | 707| 180| 445 | 53.7 | 23.3 | 42.5 | 97.9 | 46.8 | 72.7 | 24.3 | 13.2 | 20.8 ]1,316 | 775 | 1,046 | 90.6 | 61.5 | 77.1 | 106.2 | 108.7 | 107.4] 134.0] 159.0 | 15.7 | 54.8 877 | 20,407 | 22,598} 173 | 197 Boston & Maine...............0065 "1 7403 | 3’247 | 5,342 | 10.7 | 11.1 | 10.9] 693] 292] 490 | 52.3 | 32.6 | 44.3 | 89.4 | 57.2 | 73.7 | 25.9 | 18.5 | 23.1 |1,324 | 804 1,107 | 83.1 | 71.9 | 78.1} 116.1 | 108.2 | 112.1 | 331.0] 447.0 | 25.9 | 47.8 904 | 19,126} 51,767 | 161 | 179 Central New England..............-- 14.149 | 1.628 | 8,339 | 11.3 | 12.8 | 12.0 |1,253 | 127] 696 | 62.6 | 13.5 | 47.2 | 97.3 | 19.6 | 58.0 | 34.7 | 16.8 | 31.7 |2,001 | 941 | 1,477 | 76.8 | 75.2 | 76.3 | 113.1 | 100.7 | 107.0 , } Central Vermont.......-....0+20+200 2419 | 47283 | 3392] 10.0| 9.2] 9.6] '242| 464 | 354 | 34.5 | 46.3 | 41.5 | 52.2 | 94.6 | 75.1 | 21.3 | 19.4 | 20.0 | 703 | 1,003 | '854 | 65.5 | 87.3 | 76.9 | 100.8 103.2 102.0 34.9 47:3 6.2 48.7 at 15468 "8°352 68 502 Grand Trunk Lines in New England. . .|13,195 | 1,456 7333 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 11.9 [1,112 | 121 | 614 | 64.1 | 15.1 | 48.5 | 97.3 | 12.7 | 50.5 | 30.5 | 26.8 | 37.7 11,733 | 802 | 1,265 | 80.3 | 60.0 | 72.5 | 101.0 | 101.2 | 101.1 26.0 31.0 | 16.1 | 74.8] 1,233 | 44,739 6,250 | 180 | 146 Maine Central.............-0000e008- 3725 | 5,542 | 4,670 | 11.3 | 10.4] 10.8] 330| 535 | 432 | 40.1 | 47.9 | 44.6 | 57.0 | 81.0 | 69.9 | 23.0 | 22.4 | 22.6] 823 |1,118 | 970 | 62.1 | 75.1 | 69.0] 1 2 1 Now York, New Haven & Hartford....| 7782 | 3'529 | 5,736 | 10.4 | 11.1| 10.7] 749] 319 | 536 | 55.6 | 33.9 | 46.7 | 92.2 | 60.3 | 76.2 | 27.1 | 17.3 | 23.2 |1,348 | 941 | 1,146 | 79.7 | 60.2 | 70.4 105.9 | 103.8 | 104.9 | 353.0 457.0 | 22.8 | 37.0] 1,018 | 17596 | 50°565 200 | 198 Rutland. .. 175 | 3735 | 44611 8.5 | 8.7 | 8.6] 609| 427] 517 | 51.2 | 42.5 | 47.2 | 89.4 | 73.2 | 81.4 | 23.3 | 20.6 | 22.1 11, ' , , , utland........cce ccc ee cece ee eees AA 5, . . .1 | 1,189 | 1,004 | 1,096 | 73.3 | 61.6 | 67.4 | 103.6 | 108.6 | 106.1 30.0 34.8 | 13.8 | 34.3 975 | 15,805 3747 | 209 | 214 ToraL, New Encuanp Disrricr...| ..... | ....- 5,498 11.1 496 | .... | .... | 45.0} .... | 2... | 72.2 23.4} ....[ 0... [1102 P 00.0] oo. Pea de. pee. 107.3 | 1,061.8 | 1,382.5 | 23.2 | 44.9 955 | 19,308 | 169,011 | 181 | 190 NOTE—Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Ry. included in the Southern Region. | (x) Excluding caboose miles. (y) Excluding light locomotive miles. (z) Including light locomotive miles. FREIGHT TRAIN AND FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE (Mixed and Special Trains not included) W. H. WILLIAMS EXHIBIT No. iS SHEET NO. 2 TWELVE MONTHS, JANUARY 1, 1919 TO DECEMBER 31, 1919 Compiled from Monthly Statistics of United States Railroad Administration (Series O. S. 1—3) TRAIN PERFORMANCE LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE Net Ton Miles Train Speed Net Ton Miles Per cent. Net Per cent. Loaded Net Ton Miles Gross Ton Miles Per cent. Gross Per cent. Locomotive Average Number of Loco. | Gross Net Ton Pounds of Coal REGIONS per in per Ton Miles to Car Miles to per per Ton Miles to Miles to Freight Locomotives Miles} Ton Miles per Train Hour Miles per Hour Train Mile Gross Ton Miles Total Car Miles Loaded Car Mile Train Mile Rating Ton Miles Train Miles per | Miles per Tons e _ | Total | per Total of Coal % Un-| Loco. | Loco. | Loco. | Consumed {Loco.| 1000 East | West | Total | East | West | Total | East | West | Total || East | West | Total | East | West | Total | East | West | Total | East | West | Total | East | West | Total] East | West | Total | Service- | Total jservice- Day | Mile Day Mile |Gross Ton (zt) | @) | @) (y) (y) (y) able able | (z) (z) (z) | Miles MAY ToraLt, New ENGLAND DisTRICT....... ..... | . 05. 5,677 11.2 508 45.0 73.0 23.0 1,128 75.4 wo... | eee 108.0 | 1,061.6 | 1,399.7 | 24.2 | 45.3 970 | 19,788 171,967 | 175 180, Total, Central District.........0..00f cece e | cece 9, 565 11.0 869 46.7 67.8 26.8 1,858 TLL YP oe. | oe. 112.7 | 4,082.5 | 5,490.1 | 25.6 | 45.3 } 1,546 | 32,750 | 902,908 f 234 151 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f 0.0... | ..e-- 8, 770 10.3 848 50.8 66.0 31.4 1,668 67.6} ..... | ..... 105.4 762.3 | 1,039.0 | 26.6 | 48.4 | 1,553 | 33,249 | 184,788 | 237 153 Toran, ALLEGHANY REGION.......... Poeeeee | eee. 8, 995 9.7 928 51.7 64.5 34.5 1,796 72.97 ..... | ...e. 115.6 | 3,740.9 | 5,699.0 | 34.4 | 52.0 | 1,432 | 38,467 | 1,083,970 | 237 166 ToraL, POCAHONTAS REGION..........f ..025 | eeeee 11,974 9.3 1,291 55.2 59.5 41.6 2,341 76.7 | ..... | eee 116.2 901.4 | 1,230.5 | 26.7 | 48.1 1,938 }| 51,437 | 288,397 | 314 162 ToTaL, SOUTHERN REGION...........6f 2.006 | eee. 6, 726 11.8 571 45.6 70.3 24.3 1,252 73.1] 0.0.2 | eee. 104.3 | 3,017.2 | 3,900.8 | 22.7 } 60.1 1,171 | 32,106 | 803,935 | 221 189 | Torat, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......J/ ..... | 2... 8,211 11.0 746 48.5 68.4 26.9 1,538 71.24 ..... | wee. 105.1 | 3,243.3 | 4,262.7 | 23.9 | 51.9 | 1,397 | 35,156 | 790,571 } 231 165 ToTraL, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION....f ..... | ..... 7,954 12.1 659 44.6 68.3 24.5 1,477 74.0 1 «2... | oe... 106.4 | 3,611.7 | 5,068.3 | 28.7 | 56.0 | 1,296 | 32,404 } 1,052,942 | 239 185 ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......} ..... | ...-- 5,791 11.1 521 43.7 66.2 24.3 1,191 73.8.0... | 00... 101.1 | 1,678.8 | 2,344.5 | 28.4 | 60.9 | 1,156 | 30,755 | 463,274 | 209 181 Granp TotaL, ALL REGIONS..........] ..... | ..5-- 8,145 11.0 743 47.8 67.3 27.8 1,555 72.7} ..... | eee. 108.2 || 22,099.7 | 30,4384.6 | 27.4 | 52.6 | 1,362 | 34,211 | 5,747,752 | 232 170 NEW ENGLAND ROADS - Bangor & Aroostook.............00065 3,158 | 4,813 | 4,085 1 10.6 | 9.4] 10.0] 297] 510 | 403 | 39.4 | 45.0 | 42.8 | 65.4 | 84.4 | 76.1 | 19.8 | 20.6 | 20.3 | 753 | 1,182 | 943 | 70.6 | 66.9 | 68.3 | 102.0 | 103.4 | 102.7 26.9 40.5 | 33.6 | 35.4 903 | 13,658 3,107 | 140 155 Boston & Albany...............0000- 9, 442 | 2,738 | 6,523 | 12.5 | 15.6 | 18.9} 753 | 176 | 470 | 55.8 | 21.7 | 48.4 | 97.8 | 43.7 | 71.0 | 25.2 | 12.9 | 21.4 |1,350 | 809 | 1,085 | 93.7 | 63.2 | 79.7 } 106.2 | 108.7 | 107.4 124.0 156.0 | 20.5 | 58.8 910 | 23,206 24,178 | 170 187 Boston & Maine...............--000- 7,568 | 3.376 | 5,486 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 11.0] 699 | 303 | 499 | 52.8 | 32.9 | 44.6 | 89.8 | 57.5 | 73.8 | 26.0 | 18.3 | 23.0 | 1,823 | 920 |1,120 | 82.9 | 72.9 | 78.4 | 116.1 | 109.1 | 112.6 342.0 455.0 | 24.8 | 49.6 910 | 20,122 53,871 | 154 169 Central New England................ 14,927 | 1,576 | 8,937 | 11.3 13.9 | 12.5 1,318 | 114 | 717 } 62.3 | 12.8 | 47.7 | 96.7 | 20.2 | 59.9 | 35.3 | 15.6 | 32.1 |2,116 | 890 | 1,504 84.3 | 71.8 | 80.2 | 113.3 | 104.5 | 108.9 30.0 49.0 | 38.8 | 48.3 | 1,279 | 29,463 10,593 || 289 226 Central Vermont...............00e00: 3, 355 | 4,127 | 3, 7451 9.7| 9.61 9.71 345 | 431 | 388] 40.0 | 45.9 | 43.1 | 59.1 | 92.7 | 75.2 | 22.3 | 19.2 | 20.5 | ‘863 | 939] 901 | 75.6 | 79.7 | 77.7 | 101.0 | 104.1 | 102.5 35.8 52.4 | 31.7 | 42.5 865 | 15,812 6,662 | 193 223 Grand Trunk Lines in New England... 13, 447 | 1,974 7, 772 | 12.3 | 12.5 | 12.4 {1,092 | 158 | 627 | 63.0 | 20.1 | 49.7 | 96.2 | 18.6 | 57.4 | 385.1 | 26.1 | 33.6 11,734 | 788 | 1,263 | 82.9 | 57.8 | 73.0 | 101.0 | 101.2 | 101.1 25.0 29.0 | 18.8 | 54.4 | 1,223 | 33,033 5,268 } 215 176 Maine Central...............0 0s eee 3,749 | 5,851 | 4,572 | 11.1 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 337 | 509 | 423 | 39.8 | 47.9 | 44.3 | 58.2 | 81.4 | 70.2 | 21.9 | 22.2 | 22.1 | 848 |1,063 | 955 | 64.0 | 72.3 | 68.4 | 101.1 | 105.0 | 103.0 94.0 116.0 | 19.0 | 47.3 901 | 18,884 11,957 | 141 156 New York, New Haven & Hartford..../ 8,073 | 3,695 | 5,966 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 10.8] 774 | 333 | 555 | 54.0 | 33.8 | 45.8 | 91.2 | 61.8 | 76.7 | 26.3 | 16.8 | 22.5 | 1,483 | 985 | 1,211 | 82.9 | 62.5 | 73.3 | 107.4 | 105.8 | 106.6 354.0 467.0 | 24.2 | 37.0] 1,055 | 17,917 52,599 | 196 186 Rutland ..... 00... cece cee eee eens 5,064 | 3,867 | 4,467 8.9} 9.0] 9.0] 567 | 431 | 499 | 50.3 | 43.2 | 47.0 | 85.9 | 71.0 | 78.4 | 23.4 | 21.4 | 22.5 | 1,125 | 1,000 | 1,063 | 69.5 | 60.5 | 64.9 | 104.7 | 107.0 | 105.8 29.9 34.8 | 14.1 } 37.1 957 | 16,693 3,732 | 186 195 Toran New Encianpd Disrrict....} ..... | ..... 5,677 11.2 | 508 45.0 73.0 23.0 1,128 75.4 fo... | eee. 108.0 | 1,061.6 | 1,399.7 | 24.2 | 45.3 970 | 19,788 | 171,967 | 175 180 JUNE | Tora, New Enocianp District.......J ..... | ..... 5,635 11.1 507 44.8 72.3 | 22.9 1,132 76.0] ..... ] 20... 107.9 | 1,066.5 | 1,408.1 | 24.3 | 47.0 973 | 20,476 | 170,063 | 171 176 Total, ‘Central District...........000f 00000 | wees 9,660 10.9 882 47.2 68.4 26.9 1,870 71.3... | wee. 112.7 | 4,048.9 | 5,445.5 | 25.6 | 45.9 | 1,556 | 33,723 | 823,448 } 220 141 Total, Ohio-Indiana District...... eee ef cee ee | ee eee 9,157 10.4 880 51.4 66.1 32.0 1,713 69.2 ..... ..... 105.6 762.8 | 1,034.7 | 26.3 | 50.1 1,591 | 40,999 | 176,148 | 226 142 ToTat, ALLEGHANY R&GION..........-f 02... | wee 8,916 9.7 920 51.3 64.6 33.5 1,792 73.8 foc... | we eee 115.4 | 3,678.9 | 5,565.6 | 33.9 | 54.7 | 1,485 | 40,304 | 1,071,723 | 235 164 Toraut PocaHoNTas R&GION..........-f 00... | oe. 11, ,862 9.3 1,278 54.5 58.2 41.2 2,348 76.8] ..... | wee. 115.6 845.7 | 1,242.8 | 32.0 1 47.6 | 1,951 | 50,566 | 273,583 | 308 158 TotaL, SOUTHERN REGION..........-.) 2.0... | wee 6,770 11.9 570 45.0 69.5 24.1 1,268 73.24 0.0... [ 0... 104.3 | 3,045.6 | 3,890.7 | 21.7 | 59.8 | 1,185 | 31,860 | 755,502 | 217 183 Totat, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......] ..... | ..... 8,376 10.9 768 49.4 70.2 27.0 1,556 72.14 ..... | oo... 104.9 | 3,233.3 | 4,223.1 | 23.4 | 53.2 | 1,416 | 37,161 774,384 | 230 162 ToraLt, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION....] ..... | ..... 7,951 12.1 657 44.4 69.6 24.1 1,480 74.3 ..... | oo... 106.6 | 3,673.8 | 5,137.0 | 28.5 | 57.2 | 1,289 | 32,713 | 998,070 | 226 176 Torau, SOUTHWESTERN R&GION.......) ..... | 02... 5,750 11.0 523 44.1 67.0 24.2 1,185 V4.4) 0.0... ] 0.00. 101.1 | 1,643.9 | 2,314.3 | 29.0 | 58.8 | 1,150 | 29,796 | 423,905 } 208 181 | Granp Tota, ALL REGIONS.........-f 0.2... | 00... 8,192 10.9 749 47.8 67.8 27.6 1,566 73.29 ..... | o.... 108.2 | 21,999.4 | 30,261.8 | 27.3 | 53.5 | 1,369 | 35,026 | 5,466,826 | 225 164 NEW ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostook.............00005 2,107 | 5,296 | 3,802 |} 11.3 | 10.0 | 10.6 | 187 | 530] 359 | 26.4 | 45.9 | 38.5 | 41.7 | 90.6 | 68.1 | 17.5 | 19.6 | 19.0 | 708 | 1,156 | 933 | 65.5 | 72.3 | 69.6 4 101.1 | 108.3 | 102.2 31.6 43.6 | 27.5 | 29.8 897 | 10,304 2,509 | 129 143 Boston & Albany...............0000- 9,165 | 2,643 | 6,351 | 12.4 | 16.2 | 14.0] 742] 163 | 453 | 54.3 | 20.9 | 42.2 | 97.7 | 41.6 | 69.9 | 24.8 | 13.0 | 21.3 |1,3867 | 778 | 1,073 | 94.8 | 64.5 | 81.0 | 106.0 | 102.6 | 104.3 123.0 154.0 | 20.1 | 63.4 927 | 24,784 27,515 | 188 203 | Boston & Maine.............. 0000 eee 7,711 | 3,154 | 5,478 | 10.6 | 11.2 | 10.9 | 727 | 281 | 503 | 53.1 | 31.5 | 44.5 | 90.2 | 54.3 | 72.8 | 26.2 | 18.1 | 23.3 |1,870 | 894 | 1,130 | 84.3 | 71.1 | 78.5 | 117.4 | 108.6 | 113.0 337.0 464.0 | 27.4 | 52.3 914 | 21,256 54,464 | 150 164 Central New England..... eee e ee eee 15,322 | 1,518 | 9,293 | 11.3 | 14.4 | 12.7 11,851 | 105 | 732 | 63.1 | 12.2 | 48.7 | 97.3 | 20.0 | 59.8 | 36.1 | 14.3 | 32.5 2,140 | 859 | 1,504 | 85.6 | 70.7 | 80.8 | 119.0 | 100.1 | 109.6 34.0 51.0 | 33.38 | 47.6 | 1,243 | 28,826 10,202 | 280 225 Central Vermont................+.00- 3,070 | 4,119 3603 | 9.4] 9.3] 9.3] 328] 445 | 887 | 37.7 | 45.8 | 42.0] 60.1 | 93.2 | 76.5 | 20.8 | 18.9 | 19.7] 868] 971 | 920} 73.8 | 80.9 | 77.4 | 100.5 | 102.2 | 101.4 38.2 55.6 | 31.3 | 41.0 889 | 15,339 6,344 | 185 209 Grand Trunk Lines in New England.. ./. 12,116 | 2,883 7, 477 | 12.5 | 12.7 | 12.6 | 968 | 228] 594 | 60.1 | 28.5 | 49.5 | 94.7 | 29.4 | 62.8 | 32.3 | 26.3 | 30.9 11,610 | 799 | 1,200 | 76.7 | 59.6 | 69.9 # 100.2 | 100.2 | 100.2 31.0 36.0 | 18.9 | 38.9 | 1,177 | 22,638 4,351 | 207 176 Maine Central..................0.06: 3.889 | 5,122 | 4,527] 10.81 10.3 | 10.5} 360] 499] 430] 41.8 | 48.6 | 45.5 | 60.5 | 80.8 | 71.1 | 23.5 | 22.5 | 22.9] 861 |1,027 | 945 | 66.8 | 72.3 | 69.7 | 101.7 | 105.4 | 103.6 87.0 110.0 | 20.9 | 51.8 892 | 21,036 12,327 | 144 162 New York, New Haven & Hartford..../ 8145 | 3,622 5, 960 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 780] 3834 ]| 560] 53.5 | 33.7 | 45.6 | 89.3 | 60.3 | 75.4 | 25.5 | 17.0 | 22.3 |1,457 | 992 |1,228 | 83.7.) 62.2 | 73.6 | 106.6 | 107.6 | 107.1 354.0 457.0 | 22.5 | 39.1 1,065 | 18,992 49,286 | 184 173 Rutland... 0.2.0.0... cece eee 5,177 | 3,924 4,555 8.81 8.9] 8.9] 587 | 440 | 514 | 50.6 | 44.4 | 47.8 | 86.2 | 74.5 | 80.6 | 23.1 | 21.6 | 22.4 11,160 | 992 | 1,076 | 72.2 | 60.7 | 66.4 | 104.1 | 105.6 | 104.8 30.7 36.9 | 16.8 | 32.8 990 | 15,528 3,065 | 169 170 Toran New ENGLAND DIsTRIcT....} ..... | ..... 5,635 11.1 507 44.8 72.3 22.9 1,132 76.04 ..... | 0... 107.9 | 1,066.5 | 1,408.1 | 24.3 | 47.0 973 | 20,476 | 170,063 | 171 176 JULY Torat, New Enctann Disrrict.......f ..... | ..... 5,454 10.9 499 44.47 .... 1 .... | 70.4 23.3 1,123 75.84 ..... | 00... 108.4 | 1,033.0 | 1,876.7 | 25.0 51.7 | © 961 | 22,085 187,729 } 170 177 Total, Central District............. eof cece | eee 9, 800 10.8 906 47.9} .... | .... | 69.0 27.2 1,892 72.19 ..... | wee. 113.2 | 3,999.2 | 5,355.2 | 25.3 | 48.1 1,565 36, 013 | 879,945 | 220 141 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f 20... | 20... 8, 925 10.2 876 51.29 2... | .... | 67.7 31.3 1,713 69.1 J ..... | 20... 105.1 748.2 | 1,017.5 | 26.5 | 52.54 1,600 42, 998 | 185,895 | 224 140 TorTaL, ALLEGHANY R&GION.........--f 00... | oes 9,112 9.7 944 52.8} .... | .... | 66.4 34.0 1,787 72.24 ..... | wean 115.2 | 3,654.5 5,506. 5 | 33.6 | 57.5 | 1,483 | 43,483 | 1,155,830 | 236 165 Tora, PocaHontas REGION........--f ..... | oo. 12,334 9.4 1,312 55.8} .... | 2... | 61.5 41.4 2,351 77.9} ..... | ween. 117.5 911.3 | 1,271.4 | 28.3 } 51.1 1,916 | 54,639 | 315,592 | 313 164 | Toran, SouTHERN REGION..........--f 2.5... | ...-. 6,730 11.6 580 46.1 71.8 24.3 1,259 73.74 cc. | eee 104.1 | 3,031.0 | 3,916.3 | 22.6 | 60.6 | 1,178 | 32,910 | 794,172 | 216 183 TotaL, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......} ..... | 0... 8,118 11.1 734 47.4 66.1 26.6 1,547 M14) 0...) oc... 104.6 | 3,213.6 | 4,214.6 | 23.8 | 56.4 | 1,417 | 37,915 | 809,803 | 220 155 TotTaL, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION....} ..... | ..... 7, 872 11.9 663 44.3 67.8 24.6 1,496 73.24 ..... | 2.08. 106.8 | 3,701.4 | 5,122.2 | 27.7 | 61.1 1,301 }| 35,235 || 1,106,691 | 228 175 ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......f ..... | ..... 5, 820 10.7 546 45.2 69.7 24.4 1,207 T4.0 7 «0... | ween. 101.0 | 1,633.3 | 2,326.2 | 29.8 | 61.1 1,173 | 32,350 | 454,769 | 207 176 Granp Toran, Au Reaions..........f 00... | 0... 8,192 10.8 757 48.2 67.9 27.9 1,571 72.84 ..... | eae 108.3 | 21,925.5 | 30,106.6 | 27.2 | 56.3 | 1,373 | 37,212 | 5,890,426 | 224 163 NEW ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostook.................. 1,880 | 4,867 | 3,373 | 11.0 | 11.0] 11.0] 172 | 442 | 307 | 23.2 | 45.6 | 35.9 | 35.6 | 89.6 | 61.1 | 17.0 | 19.7 | 18.8 | 740 | 969 | 855 | 67.1 | 59.0 | 62.3 | 104.2 | 105.7 | 104.9 31.0 41.9 | 26.0 | 32.3 796 | 9,228 3,099 | 148 186 Boston & Albany................ tee 9, 207 | 2,351 | 6,260 | 12.1 | 16.0] 13.71 762| 147 | 455 | 55.5 | 19.3 | 42.6 | 98.3 | 38.1 | 68.1 | 25.9 | 12.8 | 22.2 |1,373 | 763 | 1,068 | 95.6 | 62.3 | 80.3 | 105.8 | 107.8 | 106.8 121.0 152.0 | 20.4 | 74.0 903 | 28,500 30,337 | 174 193 ‘Boston & Maine.................055- 7,391 3,042 | 5,227 } 10.6 | 10.9 | 10.8 | 697 | 278 | 485 | 53.1 | 30.6 | 43.8 | 88.8 | 51.2 | 69.8 | 26.6 | 18.5 | 23.6 1,312 | 909 1, 108 | 82.6 | 73.7 | 78.7 | 116.5 | 108.6 | 112.5 337 .0 459.0 | 26.6 | 56.9 902 | 22,479 59,347 | 147 163 Central New England....... eee eeee 14,797 | 1,567 | 9,106 | 10.8 | 14.2 | 12.3 41,368 110 | 741 | 63.4 | 12.2 48.4 | 96.9 | 19.0 | 58.5 | 36.6 | 15.3 | 33.2 12,157 | 898 | 1,530 | 85.8 | 73.0 | 81.6 | 119.0 | 100.1.| 109.6 33.0 45.0 | 26.7 | 58.5 | 1,271 | 35,981 10,675 | 262 206 Central Vermont...................5. 2,715 | 4,380 | 3,576 9.7/ 9.3] 9.5] 280| 468 | 375 | 33.9 | 46.9 | 41.1 | 54.8 | 92.7 | 73.7 | 19.2 | 19.7 | 19.5 | 824 | 999 | 913 | 71.0 | 84.4 | 77.9 | 100.4 | 101.6 | 101.0 33.5 50.9 | 34.2 | 438.1 890 | 15,782 6,099 | 179 202 Grand Trunk Lines in New England...| 6,721 | 3,933 | 5,241 | 12.1 | 11.3 | 11.7] 556 | 349 | 450 | 52.5 | 39.1 | 46.2 | 89.5 | 45.5 | 65.8 | 24.4 | 27.3 | 25.5 |1,060 | 891 | 973 | 52.9 | 70.7 | 60.0} 100.0 | 100.4 | 100.2 30.0 39.0 | 23.1 | 24.0 927 | 10,256 3,594 | 248 268 Maine Central..................0006- 3,694 | 4,437 | 4,069 (10.7 | 10.7 | 10.71 344] 414] 3791 39.0 | 46.4 | 42.8] 52.7 | 78.3 | 64.5 | 23.3 | 22.3 | 22.7] 882] 801] 887 | 67.0] 63.7 | 65.3 | 103.2 | 104.2 | 103.7 78.0 100.0 | 22.0 | 60.8 835 | 21,723 14,358 || 152 182 New York, New Haven & Hartford.. 8,003 3,602 | 5,881 } 9.9 | 10.4] 10.2} 805 | 345 | 578 | 54.2 | 34.1 | 46.2 | 90.0 | 60.3 | 75.5 | 26.4 | 17.3 | 22.9 11,485 | 1,013 | 1,252 | 84.9 | 62.9 | 74.5 | 108.8 | 106.3 | 107.6 338.0 452.0 | 25.2 | 42.7 | 1,085 } 21,378 56,345 | 189 174 Rutland. ...... 0... cc cece ee eee 5,986 4,239 | 5,120} 8.8] 8.8| 8.8] 684| 480 | 582 | 54.2 | 43.9 | 49.4 | 88.1 | 72.9 | 80.3 | 27.0 | 21.7 | 24.5 | 1,262 | 1,093 | 1,178 | 75.6 | 65.8 | 70.8 | 106.6 | 105.2 | 105.9 31.5 36.9 | 14.6 | 36.3 1,074 | 19,265 3,875 | 187 174 | Tota New ENGLAND DIsTRICT....}*..... | 2.0... 5,454 10.9 499 44.4 70.4 23.3 1,123 75.8 ..... 4 .0ee- 108.4 | 1,033.0 | 1,376.7 | 25.0 | 51.7 961 | 22,085 | 187,729 | 170 177 AUGUST | Torat, New Encianp Districr.......J ..... | 60. §,337 10.9 491 44.9 71.0 23 .6 1,093 (CS. re re 108.1 972.0 | 1,343.6 | 27.7 } 51.9 933 | 21,726 | 187,340 | 173 186 Total, Central District.............0.f eee. | vane 9,943 10.5 947 48.9 71.2 27.7 1,936 73.0} ..... ] 2.2... 113.2 | 4,001.5 | 5,844.7 | 25.1 | 50.3 | 1,599 | 39,349 | 952,605 | 229 143 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f 0.0... | ...-. 9,085 10.2 892 52.1 71.0 31.4 1,711 7O.L 4.0... 4 20... 105.5 775.0 | 1,029.2 | 24.7] 58.0 | 1,593 | 48,159 } 211,052 | 228 143 ToraL, ALLEGHANY REGION. cecseceeeep cose | eevee 8,862 9.0 984 53.3 68.2 34.8 1,847 TA.0H 2.00. | wee. 115.7 | 3,904.9 | 5,641.7 | 30.8 | 58.7 | 1,475 | 46,110 | 1,254,298 |, 245 166 TotaL, PocAHONTAS REGION..........) ©... | wees 12,208 9.3 1,309 55.3 60.7 41.2 2,366 78.3 fo..... | wee. 117.8 907.5 | 1,284.9 | 29.4 | 47.1 1,929 | 50,207 | 285,273 | 304 158 ToTaL, SOUTHERN REGION...........-f e000 6 | veers 6,764 11.3 596 47.7 74.2 25.0 1,250 73.3] 00... |] ween, 104.1 | 2,948.2 | 3,925.2 | 24.9 | 58.1 1,169 | 32,408 | 786,545 | 222 190 Torar, NorrHwestern Reaion.......)...... | 0... 7,590 11.0 P 691 47.7 71.6 . | 25.3 1,449 69.4) ..... 4, 00... 104.4 | 3,092.5 | 4,234.2 | 27.0 | 54.1} 1,325] 34,179 | 798,990 | 229] 174 ToTaL, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION....] ..... | ...-- 7,969 11.7 681 45.0 69.9 24.6 1,514 72.8 ..... 1 wee, 106.1 | 3,747.8 | 5,189.3 | 27.8 | 64.6 1,335 38,846 | 1,208,735 | 233 174 ToTAL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......f 6.0... | .-e-- 5,841 10.4 559 | 46.0 71.1 24.7 1,213 75.0 ..... | 2... 101.0 | 1,648.7 | 2,331.6 | 29.3 | 63.1 1,176 | 34,198 | 477,045 | 209 178 Granp ToTaL, ALL REGIONS.......... ..... | oe ee. 8,130 10.5 772 48.9 70.3 28.0 1,578: 73.0 ..... | wee. 108.2 |21,998.1 | 30,324.4 | 27.5 | 57.0 | 1,380 | 38,483 | 6,161,883 | 230 167 NEW ENGLAND ROADS | Bangor & Aroostook...............64. 1,908 | 5,176 | 3,662 | 11.5 | 10.1 | 10.8} 165 | 514 | 341 | 24.9 | 46.8 | 38.6 | 41.0 | 89.1 | 66.7 | 16.3 | 20.4 | 19.3 | 664 | 1,098 ; 882 | 63.0 | 65.7 | 64.6 | 104.8 | 109.1 | 106.9 30.4 42.7 | 28.8 || 33.1 805 | 10,285 3,169 | 145 180 Boston & Albany...... eee e eee eee ee 8,802 | 2,323 | 5,960 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 138.6] 721 | 151 | 438 | 56.1 | 19.9 | 42.8 | 98.0 | 39.2 | 67.7 | 26.7 | 12.9 | 22.6 11,285 | 755 | 1,022 | 90.3 | 61.6 | 77.1 | 105.4 | 108.5 | 106.9 121.0 152.0 | 20.4 | 70.5 863 || 26,055 28,572 | 172 199 Boston & Maine..................05. 7,153 | 3,239 | 5,209 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 10.6 | 683} 303 | 492 | 53.1 | 83.1 | 44.7 | 89.8 | 54.4 | 72.2 | 26.0 | 19.5 | 23.6 11,286 | 916 | 1,101 | 81.9 | 73.6 | 78.2 | 116.5 | 108.4 | 112.4 305.0 445.0 | 31.5 | 58.1 890 | 23,144 60,476 | 151 170 Central New England....... eee ee eee 15,223 | 1,608 | 9,082 | 10.9 | 14.0 | 12.3 11,3898 | 115 | 739 | 63.7 | 12.5 | 48.0 | 97.6 | 19.5 | 57.5 | 37.6 | 15.5 | 33.8 |2,194 | 916 | 1,538 | 86.7 | 71.0 | 81.2 | 119.2 | 100.1 | 109.4 | 40.0 51.0 | 21.6 | 56.0 | 1,229 | 33,077 12,073 || 273 222 Central Vermont.................0.5. 2,178 | 4,895 | 3,566] 9.3/} 9.0] 9.2] 2384} 542 |} 389 | 29.2 | 50.1 | 41.3 | 49.8 | 93.1 | 71.2 | 17.2 | 22.1 | 20.3 | 801 |1,081 | 942 | 68.6 | 90.8 | 79.9 | 100.1 | 101.3 | 100.7 31.9 47.4 | 32.7 || 47.2 912 | 17,758 6,721 | 194 213 Grand Trunk Lines in New England...| 6,274 | 3,597 | 4,798 | 13.0 | 10.9 | 11.8 | 483 | 331 | 406 | 52.3 | 38.4 | 45.5 | 90.1 | 47.0 | 66.0 | 24.3 | 25.9 | 24.9 | 925 | 862 | 893 | 50.4 | 69.7 | 58.3 | 101.5 | 103.0 | 102.3 30.0 37.0 | 18.9 | 23.2 838 | 8,851 2,803 || 211 251 Maine Central....................065 3,747 | 4,900 | 4,344 | 11.1 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 337 | 458 | 399 | 40.9 | 47.6 | 44.5 | 61.0 | 82.3 | 72.0 | 22.1 | 21.7 | 21.9 | 824] 963 895 | 62.3 | 69.8 | 66.2 | 104.3 | 105.2 | 104.7 80.0 102.0 | 21.6 | 58.5 828 || 21,595 13,348 || 144 174 New York, New Haven & Hartford....| 7,510 | 3,446 | 5,561 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 758 | 324 | 542 | 55.0 | 33.1 | 46.0 | 91.2 | 55.0 | 73.2 | 26.6 | 19.1 | 23.8 |1,378 | 978 |1,179 | 82.2 | 63.1 | 73.1 | 107.4 | 104.5 | 106.0 302.0 432.0 | 30.1 | 42.6 1,084 | 20,234 56,143 || 197 191 Rutland.......... 0... cee eee ee eee 6,199 | 3,754 | 5,003 | 9.5} 9.9| 9.7] 655 | 381 | 518 | 53.9 | 41.8 | 48.7 | 87.7 | 70.3 | 79.3 | 26.5 | 20.6 | 24.0 1,214 | 911 [1,063 | 72.8 | 54.7 | 63.8 | 104.0 | 102.5 | 103.3 31.7 34.5 | 8.1] 41.4 997 || 20,091 4,035 | 182 183 ToraL, New ENGLAND Disrrict...} ..... | ..... 5,337 10.9 491 44.9 71.0 : 23.6 1,093 . | 74.84 ..... | oe... 108.1 972.0 | 1,843.6 | 27.7 | 51.9 933 | 21,726 | 187,340 | 173 186 NOTE—Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Ry. included in the Southern Region. (xz) Excluding caboose miles. (y) Excluding light locomotive miles. (z) Including light locomotive miles. W. H. WILLIAMS EXHIBIT No. 135 FREIGHT TRAIN AND FREIGHT LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE SHEET NO. 3 (Mixed and Special Trains not included) TWELVE MONTHS, JANUARY 1, 1919 TO DECEMBER 31, 1919 Compiled from Monthly Statistics of United States Railroad Administration (Series O. S, 1—3) TRAIN PERFORMANCE LOCOMOTIVE PERFORMANCE Net Ton Miles Train Speed Net Ton Miles Per cent. Net Per cent. Loaded Net Ton Miles Gross Ton Miles Per cent. Gross Per cent. Locomoti an REGIONS per _ in per Ton Miles to Car Miles to per ; per Ton Miles to Miles to we ireaht Locomotives Miles Gross Net Ton Pounds of Coal Train Hour Miles per Hour Train Mile Gross Ton Miles Total Car Miles Loaded Car Mile Train Mile Rating Ton Miles Train Miles per Miles Miles r per , per ons — Total} per Total | of Coal — Kast | West | Total | East | West | Total] East | West | Total| East | West | Total} East | West | Total} East | West | Total] East | West | Total|) East | West | Total} East West | Total | Service- | Total covion Dae Bile peo. Consumed |Lioco.| 1000 @) | @ | @ w | @ | @ | able able | (@) | @ | “O (oe en 5,443 10.4 525) .... | .... | 46.5] .... |] .... | 72.4 24.6 1129] .... 76.2 1 — JEPT. ToTaL, NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT.......ff ..... [ 20s ) ’ cee +t weeee | ween 09.3 1,038 .2 1,867.7 | 24.1 58.3 956 . Total, Central District........-... 06 fo eee ee fees 9,913 Me ne vane | cane 40-3 wees focaee i. 27.8 303 veee [owes | TELAT Lp lll, 113.3 | 4,032.1 | 5,389.1 | 25/2 | 53.1 1 565 40'906 1 002901 234 130 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f 06... | seee- 8,704 ee 1G |... | wee | TOTP OP ee, 105.3 767.5 | 1,023.9 | 25.0] 59.0] 1,598 | 48°530 | ’213’g99 236 138 wees | wees 3.9 68.4 34.7 1,829} .... 4. 13.5 Tova, ALLEGHANY REGION.........--f ee ee | veers 8,677 8.8 985 5 182 ee 7 er re 114.9 | 3,993.0 | 5,634.2 | 29.1 | 61.3 1,470 ToraL, PocAHONTAS REGION..........1 2... | cesses 11,881 22 1,298 weve |ocaee aoe 60.2 a1 .2 2,352 veee foeeee | OOTP OL Poe, 117.7 883.0; 1,284.1 | 31.2 | 56.0 987 Beane "aga one 309 100 Toran, SourumRN REGION...000s.cc lle | le 6,709 veee | oveee . 25.5 266} 2...) 2... 17467 0000 Pi) 104.4 | 2,904.1 | 3,927.4 | 23.8] 63.0] 1182 | 35,343] 8307416 | 296 | joy TotaL, NORTHWESTERN REGION......-f ..... | ----- 7,987 10.7 747 Pw. | we. | 47.9 68.8 26.7 1,558 Ff .... | 0... | 7B PO. | ol, 104.6 | 3,292.0 | 4,291.7 | 23.3 | 63.9 1,422 ToTaL, CENTRAL WESTERN REGION....J ..... | ..--- 1843 ie oe rene fn eee e's wee ae P08 reve Toeeee (3.4 veeee | oveaee 106.0 7 3,728.0 | 5,118.2 | 27.2] 72.1] 1341 43°500 13967575 340 is ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......J ..--- | --+>: ; weee | weee , ; , wees | ovae, Of ...ee | wee, 101.2 | 1,714.7 | 2,358.0 | 27.3 | 64.6 1,170 | 34,604 494546 217 185 we | eae 8,073 10.4 778 Jo... |... | 49.0 69.5 28.4 1,587 | .... |... , Granp Torat, AL Recions..........] ... ) 73.25 0... | oe, 108.2 | 22,442.6 | 30,394.3 | 26.2 | 62.1 1,390 | 42,410 | 6,720,287 | 238 171 ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostook bene ee cence ee eeeee 1,971 | 5,147 | 3,632 | 11.8 | 10.3 | 10.8 175 | 500 | 337 | 26.6 | 48.6 | 40.0 | 40.8 | 91.1 | 67.6 | 18.2 | 20.6 | 19.9] 657 |1,028 | 842 } 63.6 | 64.3 | 64.0 | 101.4 | 104.7 103.1 30.0 41.4 | 27.5 | 40.8 803 | 13,114 Boston & Albany............0.0ee eee 9,136 | 2,200 | 6,405 | 11.1 | 16.6 | 13.3 | 821) 138 | 481 | 57.7 | 21.0 | 46.2 | 98.5 | 41.0 | 71.9 | 28.4 | 13.2 | 24.4 11,424 | 657 | 1,042 | 99:8 | 58:6 | 81/8 | 106.1 | 107-1 | 108.6] 12312| 1520 | 24° 81.7 886 | 33°412 seat ine | 282 Boston & Maine..............eeeeees 7,062 | 3,179 | 5,154) 9.8 | 10.3 | 10.1 720 | 308 | 513 | 54.3 | 33.4 | 45.7 | 90.6 | 53.5 | 72.1 | 27.1 | 20.0 | 24.5 11,326 | 922 1,123 | 83.1 | 73.5 | 78.9 | 118.2 | 110.3 | 114.2 323.0 451.0 | 28.4 66.4 897 | 27,161 73/340 163 183 England.............06: 14,699 | 1,416 ; 8,890 | 10.2 | 13.0 | 11.4 71,448 109 | 780 4 64.9 | 11.6 | 49.2 | 97.7 | 18.0 | 57.1 | 38.6 | 15.1 | 34.8 12,230 | 939 | 1,586 | 87.5 | 73.6 | 82.9 118.0 | 101.2 | 109.6 45. ~ Central Vermont Ledeen eee enees 2877 | 4,411 | 3,674) 9.5] 9.0] 9.3 302 | 491 | 397] 37.0] 47.6 | 43.0] 57.1 | 93.3 | 75.3 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 20.5 815 1,030 | 923 | 71.2 | 87.2 | 79.4 } 101.0 | 102.1 | 101.5 36 4 ad 29 3 15.9 "988 17270 @bas ie rr Grand Trunk Lines in New England...| 7,087 | 3,260 | 5,090 | 12.4 | 11.3) 11.8} 574 | 288 | 431 | 54.6 | 36.4 | 46.8 }| 92.8 | 45.9 | 68.8 ]| 25.0 | 24.1 | 24.7 ]1,051 | 791 921 | 56.7 | 65.4 | 60.2 | 100.0 | 100.6 | 100.3 29.0 39.0 | 25.6 | 20.2 881 8,323 27536 ate 44 ine Central........ 0.2... eee eee eee 3,913 | 5,429 | 4,685 7 11.0 | 10.5 | 10.8 | 356 | 515 | 485 7 41.2 | 49.7 | 45.8 | 56.5 | 86.1 | 71.4 f 24.4 | 22.8 | 23.4 | 863 |1,037 | 950 | 63.0 | 70.8 | 67.0 101.0 | 103.5 | 102.2 82.3 104.4 ; Now York, New Haven & Hartford....j) 7,856 | 3,269 5,648 9.3; 9.6} 9.44 847} 340] 598} 56.9 | 34.1 | 48.0 | 91.4 | 59.5 | 75.7 | 28.9 | 17.6 | 24.5 11,489 | 996 1,247 | 84.6 | 62.7 | 74.4 | 110.3 | 107.1 | 108.7 336.7 441.1 93.7 49.0 1 064 28031 88 684 206 193 Rutland... 2.0... cee eee ees 5,575 | 4,009 | 4,793 | 9.4) 9.5} 9.5} 592; 420} 506 | 52.1 | 42.4 | 47.6 | 87.8 | 68.2 | 77.6 | 24.9 | 21.2 | 23.2 11,136 | 990 | 1,063 | 66.3 | 59.3 | 62.8 106.9 | 104.4} 105.7]. 31.8 33.8 | 5.9 | 43.2 994 207407 4,779 318 330 ToraL New ENGLAND DISTRICT....j} ..... | «2+. 5,443 10.4 525 J .... | 2... | 46.5 12.4 24.6 1129p ....) 2... | 76.29 000.0 | oo... 109.3 | 1,038.2 | 1,867.7 | 24.1 1 58.3 956 | 25,919 217,294 | 182 190 OCT. Torat, New ENGLAND DISTRICT.......} «1... | .---- 5,312 10.4 513 | .... | 2... | 45.4 70.0 24.5 11309 .... f 2... | 76.38 F 00... | oo... 108.4 | 1,059.5 | 1,890.9 |} 23.8 } 60.4 970 | 26,594 Total, Central District...........-.--f ee. -- | eee. 9,329 10.2 912 fF .... | .... | 48.7 70.3 27.7 1875 fo... | .... | 704 od ll, 112.6 | 3,992.2 | 5,364.9 | 25.6] 55.0] 1,559 | 41,753 | 4 102579 at 15s Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........J 0 ..... ] 20... 8,305 9.7 859 f .... | .... | 51.2 64.2 32.8 L677 qo... | ee. | OO.B PL. Pl, 106.6 762.5 | 1,009.3 | 24.5] 63.6} 1,546 | 50,301 235,280 236 153 Tora, ALLEGHANY REGION...........f) 06... [ see 8,203 8.6 949 | .... | 2... | 53.3 66.6 34.4 1,782 fo... | .... | TL. Pe. | le, 114.9 | 4,048.8] 5,693.7 | 29.0] 61.9] 1,434] 47,081 | 1.4 a TOTAL, ALLEGHANY segioNcttnperts [rs 11559 9.0 1,290} .... | 2... | 55.0 59.6 41.0 2,344, 00) 772 pl |) 117.3 | 897.5 | 1274'9 | 20.6 | 58.4] 1’924] 6i’sos | ’342’785 | son | 182 ToraL, SOUTHERN REGION............f 20.6. J eee 6,321 10.9 581 fp .... 1 .... | 46.4 69.6 25.4 1,254) .... | .... | 738.5 Pl | ol, 104.5 | 3,027.9 | 3,942.0 | 23.2 | 67.1 1,169 | 36,357 | 958213 | 234 200 Torat, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......f 20... | ..... 7,226 10.4 692 | .... | .... | 47.0 69.9 25.6 L475 po .... | owe. | OBOE Lt ol, 104.4 | 3,310.6 | 4,312.3 | 23.2 | 66.2 1,372 } 42,657 | 1,106,1 ToraL, CENTRAL WESTERN RuGION....J..... | 22... 7,378 11.1 666} .... | .... | 44.9 68.3 24.9 1483 fo... |... | 7200 F ep 106.2 | 3'830:4 | 5,265.1 | 27.2] 73.6} 1’310 | 43°295 | ’sna’ors | seg 194 ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......f) ..... | ...-. 5,338 9.9 539 f .... | .... | 45.3 69.8 24.6 L190 f .... ) 0... | 74.2 Pll dl... 100.9 | 1,741.5 | 2,352.1 | 26.0 | 65.4 1,157 | 34,259 526,657 221 191 Granp Totau, ALL REGIONS.......... 00... ] 22... 7,584 10.1 751 fw... | wee. | 48.4 68.3 28.1 155i po .... fo... | TL dl, 108.1 | 22,665.9 | 30,604.7 | 25.9 | 64.21 1,362 | 42,337 1,457,804 | 245 180 NEW ENGLAND ROADS 7 Bangor & Aroostook..............006. 1,757 | 5,574 | 3,770 7 10.7 | 9.6] 10.1 165 | 584 | 374 | 20.7 | 49.9 | 38.1 } 34.0 | 89.9 | 61.5 | 16.0 | 22.2 20.5 | 797 |3,170 | 983 | 72.3 | 68.2 | 69.8 | 102.9 | 105.0 | 103.9 29.8 42.1 | 29.2 | 46.6 929 | 16,475 5,225 | 172 185 Boston & Albany............0..0008. 9,171 | 2,242 | 6,270 | 11.4 | 15.6 | 13.1 804 | 144 | 477 | 58.0 | 20.0 | 45.2 | 98.5 | 39.0 | 69.0 | 28.9 | 138.1 24.5 1,887 | 719 | 1,056 |101.1 | 62.5 | 83.7 | 107.5 | 106.9 | 107.2 119.4 153.0 | 21.9 | 84.4 888 } 33,855 36,665 } 183 206 Boston & Maine.............002 ee ee 6,694 | 3,181 | 4,937 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.1 668 | 313 | 489 | 52.8 | 33.0 | 44.3 | 88.2 | 52.2 | 69.7 | 26.5 | 20.2 | 24.1 1,265 | 948 1,105 | 81.4 | 76.7 | 79.3 | 115.1 | 109.5 | 112.3 337.0 469.0 | 28.1 | 66.2 906 26,540 83,792 | 174 192 Central New England................ 13,234 | 1,569 | 8,253 | 9.5 | 12.7 | 10.9 11,391 123 | 758 | 63.6 | 12.6 | 47.8 | 98.0 | 18.8 | 56.9 f 36.7 | 15.7 | 33.1 12,186 | 982 | 1,585 | 83.7 | 75.8 | 81.1 1 119.0 100.2 | 109.6 41.8 A7.7 | 12.4 | 68.7 1 7 Gentral Vermont... 0s, 2.099 | 4.214] 31811 8.91 8.3] 8.6] 235 | 510! 370} 28.8 | 48.5 | 39.8 | 44.3 | 91.6 | 64.7 1 17.8 24.1 | 21.6 | 816 | 1,051 | 931 | 77-2 | 88.5 | 83.1] 101.1 | 102.7 | 101.9 34.6 51.4 | 32.7 | 46.5 es i8'593 T 403 500 03 Grand Trunk Lines in New England...} 9,976 | 2,729 | 6,134 { 12.8 | 11.2 | 11.9 | 779 | 244] 514 1 61.1 | 30.1 | 49.2 | 96.3 | 36.7 | 64.7 | 32.0 | 23.1 | 29.4 11,275 | 811 1,045 | 66.2 | 64.6 | 65.6 | 100.7 | 101.0} 100.8 30.0 388.0 | 21.1 | 27.5 1,015 13,742 3.214 198 195 Maine Central...............000 ee eee 3,623 | 5,703 | 4,704} 11.3 | 10.5 | 10.9} 321 | 541 431 } 36.9 | 50.2 | 44.3 | 46.9 | 85.6 | 66.2 } 24.5 | 23.1 | 23.6] 870 /1,078 | 975 | 65.4 | 74.5 | 70.2 | 102.8 | 104.2 103.5 82.7 109.6 | 24.5 | 69.0 917 § 2 New York, New Haven & Hartford... 7,786 | 3,239 | 5,613] 9.2| 9.9] 9.5] 846] 327| 589] 56.1 | 33.6 | 47.4 | 91.2 | 58.3 | 74.9 | 28.7 | 17.3 24.3 41,508 | 975 | 1,243 | 84.0 | 59.4 | 72.3 | 109.2 | 105.6 | 107.4] 353.1] 443.5] 20:4] 49.71 1081 ere 73809 a3 197 Rutland....... 0... . cece eee eee eee 6,243 | 4,260 | 5,258] 9.5) 9.7] 9.6] 656 | 440 | 547 | 53.7 | 44.7 | 49.6 | 90.5 | 72.7 | 81.7 | 25.5 | 22.1 | 24.1 1,221 984 , 1,103 | 71.5 | 59.0 | 65.3 | 110.3 | 105.9 | 108.1 31.1 36.1 | 13.9 | 48.5 982 23,643 5,597 206 210 Toran New Enauanpd DIstRict....f§ ..... | ..... 5,312 10.4 513 fo... |... | 45.4 70.0 24.5 1,130} .... | «0... | 76.389 0.0.0 J 000.. 108.4 | 1,059.5 | 1,390.9 | 23.8 | 60.4 970 | 26,594 | 247,075 | 190 196 NOV. Totrat, New ENGLAND DIsTRICT.......f ..... | ..... 5,080 10.5 4847 .... 1 .... | 44.7 73.8 22.5 1,083 } .... } 2...) 73.8 > 00... 4 oo... 107.3 || 1,020.0 | 1,362.7 | 25.1 } 56.0 936 | 23,448 218,332 | 191 204 Total, ‘Central District............0+ fee ee | wees 8,642 10.3 842 | .... | .... | 48.1 73.6 25.9 1,750 |} .... | .... | 65.9 cence foc eeee 111.1 | 3,942.1-] 5,399.9 | 27.0 | 49.9 1,475 35,415 1,045,503 259 175 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........f 00... | 20... 7,728 9.9 778 how... |... | 50.5 71.8 29.2 1541} .... | .... | 64.8 FP ll, 105.9 778.7 | 1,043.6 | 25.4 | 50.8] 1,432 | 36,743 | 197,972 | 249 174 Toran, ALLEGHANY REGION...........f0..... | 2... 7,699 9.3 827 | .... | .... | 51.8 70.4 31.2 1,596 | .... | .... | 66.38 FP... | ol, 113.2 } 3,991.2 | 5,654.9 | 29.4] 53.8] 1,304 | 36,381 | 1,193,062 | 261 20 Toran, Pocanontas Ruaton..........1 0.0. | 2.22 117025 9.0 1221} .... | .... | 54.9 60.1 40.5 2,226] .... | ..../ 73.97 ..... 1.0... 121.2} 918.1 | 1,291.3 | 28.9] 53.1] 1,764 | 51,346 | "323/891 | 315 179 TOTAL, SOUTHERN REGION..........-.f 02... | .eeee 6,081 11.0 595 |} .... | «2... | 45.9 74.2 23.6 1,208 | .... ] 0... | 7L.9P ot oe, 104.6 | 3,047.7 | 3,983.1 | 23.5 | 62.4 1,125 | 32,268 877,534 | 235 209 Torat, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......f ..... | 0.0... 6,117 10.4 O90 | .... | .... | 44.4 69.1 23.9 1,329 | .... [| .... | 62.5 Foo... | ol... 104.6 | 3,303.9 | 4,345.1 | 24.0] 61.1 1,215 | 32,975 | 1,028,397 }| 258 212 Torat, CENTRAL WrsTERN Reoton....} ..... | ..... 6,912 11.3 613}... | 2... | 44.7 71.1 23.9 1372] ....] 0... 1 67.4) 0.0.0 4 2200) 106.6 | 3,747.0 | 5,258.9 | 28.6] 69.8} 1,193 | 37,192 | 11418917 | 258 | 216 ToTaL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......f)..... [ ..... 5,277 9.9 533 ff .... | 1... | 45.9 72.0 24.6 L16l yw... | we. | 72.4 Fe ll, 101.0 | 1,728.5 | 2,376.8 | 27.3 | 64.7 1,126 | 33,466 | 536,744 | 232 207 GRAND ToTaL, ALL REGIONS..........f 0.0... | 2... 7,014 10.3 680 | .... | ow... | 47.5 71.2 26.2 1,483 | 2... [ 0... 1 67.4 9$ 0.00. do o., 107.7 | 22,477.2 | 30,706.3 | 26.8 | 58.8 1,260 | 35,176 | 6,840,282 | 253 200 NEW ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostook............2.000- 1,494 | 5,809 | 3,742] 10.6 | 9.8] 10.2} 141] 594] 368] 17.8 | 50.4 | 37.3 | 28.9 | 93.5 | 60.0 | 15.9 | 22.4 | 20.8] 796 /1,178] 988 | 71.5 | 67.9 | 69.3 | 100.8 | 105.6 | 103.2 34.6 45.3 | 23.6 | 44.4 939 | 15,539 5,820 | 193 | 206 Boston & Albany................046. 7,863 | 2,683 | 5,660 } 11.2 | 14.9 | 12.8 | 701 180 | 443 | 54.4 | 24.3 | 43.5 | 98.5 | 48.4 | 74.3 | 24.8 | 18.6 | 21.3 |1,289 | 743 |1,019 | 93.3 | 61.0 | 78.3 | 107.1 | 107.3 | 107.2 124.2 155.0 | 19.9 ] 71.2 859 | 26,618 26,685 | 161 188 Boston & Maine...............0.008. 6,532 | 3,188 | 4,861 } 10.1 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 647 | 308 | 476 | 52.6 | 34.4 | 44.8 | 92.2 | 58.7 | 75.4 | 25.2 | 19.2 | 22.8 11,230 | 896 | 1,061 | 80.9 | 74.1 | 77.8 1 113.5 | 107.8 | 110.6 331.0 472.0 | 29.9 | 58.4 880 | 23,057 75,521 183 207 Central New England................ 11,259 | 1,571 | 6,899 | 9.3 | 12.3 | 10.6 }1,214 | 128 | 648 | 60.5 | 13.4 | 44.4 | 97.7 | 22.1 | 57.8 | 32.5 | 14.6 | 28.9 12.005 | 954 | 1,458 | 78.9 | 73.1 | 76.9 | 121.0 | 100.5 | 110.3 38.2 51.9 | 26.4 | 53.8 1,185 | 28,335 12,111 ]| 289 244 Central Vermont.................00.. 1,847 | 4,566 | 3,251) 9.7} 9.1} 9.4] 190} 503 | 346 | 27.6 | 47.7 | 39.7 | 43.6 | 94.6 | 69.4 | 17.2 | 20.4 | 19.4] 688 ]1,056 | 871 | 60.2 | 91.3] 75.8 } 100.0 | 101.1 | 100.6 33.8 47.9 | 29.4 | 51.7 844 | 17,320 7,905 | 213 252 Grand Trunk Lines in New England.. ./ 13,318 | 1,975 | 7,442 | 12.6 | 11.6 | 12.1 {1,054 170 | 614 | 62.3 | 21.1 | 49.1 | 98.0 | 22.0 | 60.2 | 33.6 | 24.0 | 31.9 | 1,692 | 805 |1,251 | 81.3 | 59.8 | 72.9 f 102.6 | 100.9 | 101.8 30.0 37.0 | 18.9 | 37.7 1,216 | 22,534 4,827 | 231 190 ine Central..............000ce eee: 3,396 | 6,082 | 4,786 | 11.7 | 11.0 | 11.3 7 289 | 554] 422 | 34.6 | 51.0 | 43.9 | 46.7 | 88.7 | 67.9 } 23.2 | 22.9 | 23.0 | 836 |1,086 | 961 | 62.3 | 73.7 | 68.3 | 100.5 | 105.2 102.9 75.4 102.2 | 26.2 | 68.3 913 | 27,367 15,354 | 147 161 ye Oe New Haven & Hariford....| 6/344 | 3’549 | 52531 9.4] 10.1! 9:71 729 | 352] 541 153.1 | 36:1 | 46.0 | 90:7 | 65.6 | 78.3 | 24.9 | 17.3 21.8 | 1374 | 975 | 1,174 | 78.2 | 59.4 | 69.1 | 107.4 | 104.5 | 105.9 | 320.8] 412°8 | 22:3] 49.3] 1,019 | 23'123 | 64554 | 212] 208 Rutland... ......0ecc cece eee cence 5,507 | 4,546 | 5,041 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 10.2 554} 433 | 493 | 50.4 | 44.6 | 47.7 | 91.5 | 78.7 | 85.1 | 22.2 | 20.4 | 21.4 11,100 | 970 | 1,035 | 63.4 | 55.4 | 59.4 1 109.2 | 111.5 110.3 32.0 38.6 | 17.1 | 45.8 907 | 19,781 5,905 J 210 231 Totrat New ENGLAND DISTRICT....| ..... | ...-. 5,080 10.5 4847 .... | .... | 44.7 73.8 22.5 1,083 fo... | .... | 78.38 Po te, 107.3 | 1,020.0 | 1,362.7 | 25.1 {| 56.0 936 | 23,448 218,332 | 191 204 DEC. Torat, New Enauanp Districr.......J ..... | 2... 4,560 10.3 4444 ....] .... | 44.2 73.3 22.3 1,005 jf .... | .... | OBL Po... | ol, 107.3 997.6 | 1,343.9 | 25.8 | 56.5 871 # 21,748 | 240,278 | 204 234 Total, Central District...............f0.... | 2... 7,937 9.9 s02}....) 0... | 49.1 72.2 27.5 16381} 0.0) 2... | 59.8 Pp! 113.4 | 3,893.8 | 5,354.1 | 27.3 | 56.1} 1,350 | 37,206 | 1,241,553 | 267 | 198 Total, Ohio-Indiana District..........J)..... | ...-- 7,077 9.8 722} .... | 2... | 49.3 71.1 29.8 1,465 J... |... | 60.4 PP le 106.6 | 775.8 | 1,017.5 | 23.8] 62.9] 1,350 | 41,875 | 237,105 | 239 | 177 ToTaL, ALLEGHANY REGION.........-.fPo.... | .e0e 6,861 8.7 785 fo... | 6... | 52.8 69.2 32.3 1,499 | .... |] .... | 60.69 00... Lo... 113.8 | 3,961.0 | 5,568.4 | 28.9 | 55.1 1,222 | 35,249 || 1,323,729 | 278 228 TOTAL, PocAHONTAS REGION..........f 00... | ..ee. 10,057 8.9 1,129} .... | .... | 54.8 60.9 40.9 2,059 |... [ 2... | TOTP. | ., 120.9 904.2 | 1,279.4 | 29.3 | 52.7 1,639 | 47,389 328,681 | 314 192 ToTAL, SOUTHERN REGION..........--f .. 00. Jo veeee 6,005 10.7 063 f .... | .... | 46.8 71.5 20.4 1,203 | .... | .... | 70.09 ..... 7.0... 104.7 | 3,077.3 | 4,003.3 | 23.1 | 66.8 1,118 | 34,957 || 1,012,692 | 244 219 TotaL, NORTHWESTERN REGION.......J ..... | «2.6. 5,981 10.3 582 f .... | .... | 47.9 73.2 25.3 12147 0...) 2... | BB. 2G 104.9 | 3,220.6 | 4,322.9 | 25.5 | 58.8 1,108 | 31,245 991,545 | 252 227 Tora, Cenrrau Western Reaion....| ..... | ..... 6,791 11.0 615} .... | .... | 47.2 71.4 26.1 1,308 J... |... | OBL PP 106.4 | 3,652.1 | 5,159.0 | 29.2} 67.8 | 1,141 | 36,565 | 1,411,042 | 260 | 228 TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN REGION.......J ..... | ..... 5,325 9.9 540] .... | .... | 46.9 71.5 25.7 L151. yoo... | wwe. | TOF LL. do ., 101.1 | 1,748.7 | 2,387.7 | 26.8 7 65.9 1,115 | 34,509 | 569,890 | 234 209 GranD ToTaL, ALL REGIONS..........f ..... ] .. ... | 6,658 10.0 664 f .... | .... | 48.8 71.1 27.7 1,360} .... ] 0... | OBL Po. | ole. 108.2 | 22,231.1 | 30,4386.2 | 27.0 | 60.6 1,193 | 35,287 | 7,356,515 | 257 216 EW ENGLAND ROADS Bangor & Aroostock Lanne eee eee eee ees 1,348 | 5,641 | 3,563 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 10.4 127 | 561 | 344 4 17.6 | 51.7 | 38.1 | 29.8 | 92.2 | 60.8 | 15.5 | 22.8 | 21.0 | 721 |1,083 | 903 | 64.9 | 62.4 | 63.4 } 101.2 | 105.0 | 103.1 31.1 42.8 | 27.3 | 54.8 850 | 17,780 7,484 1 206 242 Boston & Albany...............0008. 6,802 | 2,861 | 5,008 | 11.7 | 18.8 | 12.6 | 583 | 207 | 396 f 52.8 | 27.0 | 42.3 | 98.3 | 49.4 | 73.0 } 23.3 | 15.2 | 20.5 11,103 | 766 | 936 | 79.4 | 61.2 | 70.8 | 106.8 | 108.6 | 107.7 123.0 155.0 | 20.6 | 71.6 780 | 23,657 31,380 | 182 234 Boston & Maine...............00 eee 5,939 | 2,819 | 4,391 | 9.9 | 10.2) 10.0} 602; 277 | 488 | 52.4 | 33.5 | 44.4 | 91.0 | 58.4 | 74.8 | 25.2 | 18.5 | 22.6 |1,148 | 827 | 987 | 75.0 | 67.7 | 71.7 | 113.5 | 108.1 | 110.7 335.0 476.0 | 29.6 | 57.1 822.) 20,854 81,633 | 194 236 tral New England................ 10,576 | 1,502 | 6,604 | 9.3 | 12.4 | 10.7 | 1,137 121 | 619 | 60.3 | 138.7 | 45.0 | 97.5 | 22.2 | 58.4 | 32.8 | 14.8 | 29.2 | 1,887 | 883 |1,375 | 74.4 | 69.4 | 72.7 | 121.2 | 100.3 | 110.6 30.0 48.9 | 28.4 | 53.8 1,119 | 27,087 12,126 } 297 266 Contra Vermont. ” Lecce eee ee eee eee 1,650 | 4,480 | 3,107 4 9.5 | 9.2] 9.3 174 | 489 | 333 | 29.6 | 49.0 | 42.0 | 57.1 | 94.8 | 79.0] 17.0 | 21.3 | 20.0] 587 | 996] '794 | 63.9 | 85.4 76.1 | 100.4 | 102.7 | 101.5 04.9 49.8 | 29.9 | 53.9 763 || 17,234 9,546 # 230 301 Grand Trunk Lines in New England...}15,012 | 1,714 | 8,234 7 18.0) 12.4 | 12.7 |1,151 139 | 649 | 63.9 | 16.7 | 49.2 | 98.9 | 16.4 | 56.9 | 34.9 | 24.2 | 33.3 ]1,801 | 831 | 1,320 | 86.3 | 61.1 | 76.5 | 100.2 | 101.0 | 100.6 28 .9 04.2 | 15.5 | 57.3 1,267 | 35,719 6,534 9 215 170 Maine Central...............-..00.05. 3,019 | 5,163 | 4,109 | 11.0} 10.7 | 10.8 | 274 | 484 | 379 | 34.6 | 49.9 | 43.0 | 45.4 | 86.4 | 65.4 | 23.3 | 22.6 | 22.8 | 793 | 970 — 882 | 57.8 | 65.0 | 61.6 | 102.2 | 104.1 | 103.2 80.0 102.5 | 22.0 | 70.3 835 | 25,269 19,347 | 173 207 New York, New Haven & Hartford....| 5,670 | 3,314 |} 4,539} 8.9] 9.7} 9.3] 6385 | 343) 489 | 51.3 | 36.5 | 44.9 | 90.2 | 67.4 | 78.9 | 23.7 | 17.4 | 21.0 |1,238 | 939 | 1,089 | 71.7 | 57.7 | 64.9 | 106.8 | 104.8 | 105.8 294.9 395.5 | 25.4 | 48.2 955 | 20,667 66,172 || 224 239 Rutland...........cceceseee eee eeees 5,815 | 3,651 | 4,788 | 9.9] 11.0] 10.4} 586 | 3831 | 458 | 52.6 | 42.5 | 48.4 | 92.2 | 77.1 | 85.4 | 24.0 | 19.5 | 22.2 11,115 | 779 | 946 | 62.2 | 44.0 | 53.1 1 114.0 | 108.8 | 111.4 34.8 39.2 | 11.2 | 45.6 813 | 17,965 6,056 | 218 269 Torat, New EnauAnD District...} ..... | ..... 4,560 10.3 444 44.2 13.3 22.3 1,005 | .... |... | OBL OL. | e.., 107.3 997.6 | 1,343.9 | 25.8 | 56.5 871 | 21,748 | 240,278 | 204 234 NOTE—Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Ry. included in the Southern Region. (x) Excluding caboose miles. (y) Excluding light locomotive miles. (z) Including light locomotive miles. ANTHRACITE AND BITUMINOUS RAIL AND WATER SHIPMENTS OF COAL INTO NEW ENGLAND Calendar Years 1917-16. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 136 ANTHRACITE BITUMINOUS TOTAL Increase Per- Increase Per- Increase Per- * 1917 1916 1917 1916 1917 1916 Dawns nent asi ome ] Sse cent ALL RAIL: New York, New Haven & Hartford __.--------- 3,063,013 | 2,663,280 399,733 | 15.01 || 5,182,378 | 4,095,669 | 1,036,709 | 25.31 8,195,391 | 6,758,949 | 1,436,442 | 21.25 Ct TOW TO na nn ane 348,129 346,001 2,128 62 596,301 684,246 87,945 | 12.85 944,430 | 1,030,247 85,817 | 8.38 Bam I ig oo eo ee 2,710,962 | 1,469,658 | 1,241,304 | 84.46 || 4,002,357 | 3,701,446 300,911 | 8.13 6,718,819 | 5,171,104 | 1,542,215 | 29.82 Ee IG anise en chien miki 1,342,147 | 1,181,162 160,985 | 13.63 2,469,964 | 2,330,841 139,123 | 5.97 3,812,111 | 3,512,003 300,108 | 8.55 PE isin enschis siesta Rnlorar input let tetanientigreipar geese 210,146 167,155 42,991 | 25.72 318,575 359,744 41,169 | 11.44 528,721 526,899 1,822 35 CORTEEE FAROE 65 io eh ok ones nmeniwne 26,617 18,155 8,462 | 46.61 66,188 58,176 8,012 | 13.77 92,805 76,331 16,474 | 21.58 PI 5 silk a iicntetreeoe einen 7,152 60,938 68,090 | ___- one | CaneG 7. 82,848 60,938 ae ae fo 8s. Re oes cae sux ears 7,708,166 | 5,784,473 | 1,923,693 | 33.26 || 12,495,763 | 11,230,122 | 1,265,641 | 11.27 || 20,208,929 | 17,014,595 | 3,189,834 | 18.74 TIDEWATER: New York, New Haven & Hartford ____.______- 174,875 270,136 95,261 | 35.26 || 2,447,894 | 3,356,511 909,117 | 27.09 || 2,622,269 | 3,626,647 | 1,004,378 | 27.69 Ce re SN eae ey SE ee Bie et ee ae ee eee uae ea a ee og SOU GOEE WO CONN ik hos Ke wen 93,789 275,541 181,752 | 65.96 2,050,176 | 1,878,397 171,779 | 9.14 2,143,965 | 2,153,938 9,973 A6 Due Meee os 5,767 3,506 2,261 | 64.49 157,906 157,051 855 5A 163,673 160,557 3,116 | 1.94 TRE nt ee ed 274,431 549,183 274,752 | 50.08 || 4,655,476 | 5,891,959 736,483 | 13.65 || 4,929,907 | 5,941,142 | 1,011,285 | 17.02 WATER: Fa OR siete nei eas ban See 4,470,825 | 4,956,212 485,387 | 9.79 8,288,458 | 9,198,948 910,490 | 9.90 || 12,759,283 | 14,155,160 | 1,395,877 | 9.86 TOTAL: New York, New Haven & Hartford ___._______- 3,237,888 | 2,933,416 304,472 | 10.88 || 17,579,772 | 17,452,180 127,592 | 1.71 || 10,817,660 | 10,385,596 432,064 | 4.16 Cintra! New Baglatd =. -** Geng Bind Si | - 8 8 S ce ce posses e255 +> Gon 4a 88a Sy sh Sy Sr SF 8? eos9 7? "Sea FIFI OS Gz Ph Fh «PL | oe eee essere eess= OMOaT TOL 9% 9% 96 9% | #929**>-* Mupasjsuly “Os 996 | | -6e2 6c TT T te te cr cr | Sees ee esses SIieyoleur) 99 9 9 9 8 9 9 Gt & eee tecse*> onsep UEIDUT osc S¢ 29 O00r OOL O01 ce a2 ZL poe dse sss > * SUemI por 709 68 68 28 18 18 28 82 | pee tose ee seee tess BOG 206 99 99 FIL PIL FEL PIE PIE PLE FIT a es oe A PIL SEL Lec 862 LOc O6E SEE LI OPE GFL co SF ote eres esse ss = BUOABy Ses | S2 82 Sc 8c 8c 19 29 19 29 29 19 pe eee ees snes ss>* S780 GSB | 86 86 86 86 386 86 86 86 86 eee see sees? > SpTAmon Tor | S¢ 86 8G $c 8c sf se Gg : pees reese ees TepaeY SP cc Gp Sh SF oF ee 6a sc ¢ | pee seeseeess) KEMtooIy) © eee Ger esr eer ; pee ee eee eeee eee! ao 7c | pq feet coy, 4404 pen Te 08 @2 8 ic 86 Sc % Gc wo To Oc GE St 22 Of St tr Sf ot tr 8 6€ & 2 F G FY B G PPeH tones S18) [840.L | eae Oc6éL AUVOUGdA AO HONOW Or WYGda.LLOd Vix avOwilvyu ANIVK ¥F NOLSOG OL AMAALING UO GIGAH SUVO it 06196 0cs — 206 ® SArqd 4M) Mie ir. Tecea LG0c PSE LELI O0le POLc OLGP TPSE Peat ars) WoL 096 186 £26 9 Val oe TOT GT cr ssess-s++*= oSpliq “sng a) ey ep = ar St sose*s9>"uTETq 310.4 “Os , 7 peo eeeneeseeeersess BOT lv¥ 19 it LE 19 Lo tT ~«90r eee Copter v3 OF WW gerne tersssser+* TIHSIED Ge Ge Peeeeetereess+* mOISSUTy GG GG geese eeeesseessee* TOgry Gol 6p LE 8& 38S wer eeee** Otte Juno oe ez a2 ss eeeesereseeees= andosa 20 Ze Ze se eeeeeeressss SIyESEOD SI¢ Got V8 ones sees) Ose UeIpul CV S-L Sr 5st Se eee sean eee* OPIASIMNYy OOF 0. 02 0c 0c OU eee eeseess= OpAD GqnoSs 09 cr Gt St S&F seees*= SUIPIS PooMespy OL - > 7 7 ssseees oseesss=s Kogury LOS Zor cot tS ts sere eee reer SICA PI O86 oF 92 GL OL 92 oe eee eeseee= FL1EU0leUueD SLE we Ge Ge Ge Gs Gs Gs Gs Ge erat eee Weng Binoy VoL TOL LOL TOL 10k 79 Ww 9 Ww VO Si epues Loo oe, €) SL SL 2 Sh Gh th cL eee eter e ee SOY ecay spt Le, Let Lvl LYE LVL LY LYE G6E tcl 6c pee tos esses STAscouIoA Sle 69 €9 $9 #%©9 &9 <9 8) 919123 1 OTT ea gc pe eseese=- Yosiog ISea 306. Fol GGL GPE cSt S&L OST Sor The OLS Sie eee ee eee SAUepiB4 S38 6969 OL OL OL ci ch Gh Gh ce So Sd sores ee S18 PITT OS V93 7) PL OL 92 92 92 SL 9h SL OL 2 pete eer eee ** ABMTISO14) ZYLV ZG S19 Ica 6le 66a 8$9¢ Oce GOS 6S 42 eee MoT Ocs SI + + ve SOL SIE GEE SOL 6G UD %¥o tr ls . we BOT seo, LeL Gs SLi Sar Set GOL 00% SY Se 72 #98 Grr oe BUSCAR. GSE gs Or gh 2 42 & wo WwW Y oreo eee SUvaIpOH eer, O91 OGt OS SS 18 28 e8 Gs ss 68 2&4 cS os ; oo tee eee en ee? OTANI NY Gog SL OL eg cg gc sg cc oo & cg rn 1000515 3,9 T10L SSE ScL GGr Gor 96 96 28 2 bt 16 Le Ls Zc eee seen eese* 107 UCIT S001 Ocl Ook Sal Sal GS 29 28 28 2s 1¢ 8& «87 Sit sore eee eee* Ton 3107 96 9 89 S$ $$ 9Y BD 9 9 8g 9 ooeeeee** 1H Seq, 98LC GELG 5 8 LZ sores eees “25f Mep19}j07 pend Te 0f Ga 8c 16 94 Go Ve SC Go Iz 0c 6 St 22 9 SE wr St cr Tt Or 6 8 2 8 Diep uonvic SIZ 1870.5 Gf GG ¥Y a 026. HOUVYA fAO HLINOKW “TOr WYduddaLou VIA GvOudIVu GNIVN * NOLSCd OL AMHATId “0a GW Savy a2 OS Pel ses = 906 @ s4UC TuH COL Se SIBO [8701 a & ¥ a 0c6t IlddyY WO HENOK WOOL WVGaEwLCOd Vis GvyOwillyu GNIVA F NOLOd Of ABMATIOG 4HOd GIA savy GOL Sz 7 26 SOL J6 Se it G2 84 22 26 18 66 OOF PIS FEL GPE CID 199 G86 OGET S0er Teel 88 1 991c cece S90c OcGl 90rc cE G9cS ~~ OL [ L ssseeee* OO ‘UBUIsculy e < eaes222s9= OIG ‘OsIe Cc c eeeneseonusess O1UO ‘Bo10g i : r 6 5 ge eeeeseeesses BMQRIUSY COS G c Sp Sr 19 19 — HepPXor rEcT OL OL St 0c tec 99¢ S0c TGl crt 9 © ¢ 06 St 7 ss Bawa Ors TST | 0z 26 69 oe eee sees ss eeeees SOA StL r oe 9G 07 7 Usnor0quey 5 5 poor e ere e tees MGISSUT ST 2 es & se seeeeerscsesss HOasOH GP r oF SF 9 = ————”—CS SUSY 36° A SEG LT 0s 08 O0¢ Of 08 f Ge ~~ pueden ee - © © § & @ @ °*****'**"**** qeInquon ose lL we we oe So Ge Go Go SG GG ~~~" sitdosg = 1 1 Th Wo TBIeO Sor IL IL 92 GZ 6a ®eseeoessesesseees Ues[y [GG le 8 $6 St SS Se Se OME W IW Coe 12 Te ce Gs ce ce ce ~~~" Sipoesz0p va LOL PSE 962 LOE “AIG Utiog Peioys r T “****""*** Boones ISOM 167 yee se la Se 1% G2 2 2a OF 98 72 Gt Fo Le ce SF Sh Gr Gy so 8 oo G9 LG GP Och Zer Sct GO = = Sleena eu Sec te cp €9 $8 06 68 cs 96 GS 96 16 18 16 S80 Ger 91c Sie rc Tel 26 9ce = eiiAteprby) 6oS Py fe 12 SIL SLIT OF6 LI9 GPO GSE Soy OLY GOP Scy SOG ToT rr ot 26 26 26 Lo 26 86 Pol Opie oF $9 69 69 69 69 69 ~~" “SIIea o19rT OS 196 SST Sco SE tS 8 78 TS PS — — — PHSe) UsIpuT eer 20 12 ae ** opeeyoreues 06S Gs Ge Ge Gs Gs Gs Ge Ge GG GG she Bite Scr T 19 19 c6 co TOL POL TOt FOr FOL TOE FOr TOE — — Tepued Téa E cs GS Or TOL ZIE Zit ZI OOF Zui Pee 2EE 7° = sitiauoj}yny ¢ @ -* + **s*"2* Srrascany GOs 69 86 86 64 Go Gc 66 16 216 Geo 96 96 96 — dujunn HOH LecT GV OL Ol OGL OS OSi OS CEL GEL SPL OPE OFT 27L ~~~ ~~~” «=~PI[EASeotp1004 SISc L S81 86. S8z S84 c6éc 8$9c 8c Sec L9i 06 8S tr Se Se = = = = ~~ BuvABY oT 9% Of -***"*+***"*"*""* wmode, TOOT VoL VEL PEL PET POT PET 220° «AB MUseT GLS cL ch €£ SL Sh GL GL Gh =~ ~~ —— — +smou Svs 9 89 8S OF ct TF G SS €2 OL 89 ~~ ~~ wenn S6c 1 ZOE GOL ZOE GOL ZOL GOL ZOl Ol "°° °MPIA Sliea e7IT Den ts Of Ge Se le 9c So te SG ca te O02 Gl SE 2b Yt St PI Si ct Tr OF G6 8&8 L FY fF FV SG G@e PIPH FORRIS is 08 LGr 11S = 906 @ 84Uq 10) CPTGL crvot itt 18 36 6S SL LIS Lae 8G SEP O19 ZOL SLL 919 G09 TOL G66 98cZE 606 066 GLOLTZ9 GcL OSS GIL Ocd ZEOL0c6 Ses 199 96 202 ~~" TOL OF OF “*** ApeiosuetoS “oC 092 cs cp cr Sp GP SP eee eee eee ss SUOsT Sc7 SL €h &2 &2 SL el “sss 9--* Ysng Bano 996 +t OF I TF tt SG tc OF to 92 OF BF SE OF MW Or EE Gr $e re 18 G62 Sc 98 Gc Sa 92 St AT St So? OTe gn” IseG 69 69 pee eeessseeees SgOx ts 18 -“SIPPH Sia FIFI sors S91 S6f OIL SS El Sho 094 Tle 16 0c £9 L8c 06 7S 2Ge Sht SL 91T 6L Gol FIT Zsc GOL 8 pees TOG 198 % G& 8 S89 8 2 + 8B FF £ GS 2L 99 ZOL Tt 4 G iy 8 cr is t@ OF 16 Ge Te WwW 8s poets esses = Bon OSs 1 1 SF OF TE 09 98 OSE c0c OGc Wz Sec 192 e6c L1G Sec LST Til PIT LL Sar LIL Oct St Ocl 06 69 eo Ge pee een eee BOAR S19 Tt 19 19 TOL StL LIL 2EL LIL Ger Shi Srl Srl SPL SL Sh €2 "==" o88p Usipuy Bor GL GL 6L GL GL 16 16 16 22 FL FL PL YL 16 16 16 FL OL peers SA} ocP GL 9g 6 Gar GZ «GI $6 «G2 = SueU OR £62 T 0Z es Ss 3 3 Ss 22 Te i 10r TOr TOL TOT TOP 89° 89 89 pee eee sess “epuey 066 6 FF GE t eG 86 09 08 G6 66 oh cS 8 €2 € 82 GE GI Tz 7+ =*5** Si[PAsooy100 4 Grr TE SFE GPL Gel LL Let 79 #9 G9 79 79 GSE OL OL O2 OF poe o sees JOT UeL A G30 co co &9«6S9~«CSS 6 02 06 99 99 TL ve GG Lee $2 8S 8G ss ooo eses* ISN 7107 LLOT by th 2h bh BE EL LE ORL 68h GL OGL GL SL 1 ** "Sita 2371 0S PleM Te OF Go Se 22 92 Se te Go Go Toe O42 GE SE 242 OF Sf FW Sk ct i OF G +S 4 9 € F EF GS E PIP tonwMs SIBO 1610.1 GvOdivya WNIVN F NOGSOd OF AMHATIOd HOW GTHH Savy a @& ¥Y a O0c6L AVYW JO HINOW LOL WYGuaaLLod ViA 14 OF 0Sz 91s — 206 © SAG IBD 9C08) 920 ST STOL ZOGE SEE SEP OLEL LOST 90cr SEFE TILE G8cr LET GLei Tso cee cor SLT SLE 6L1 sete eee ees 18IOL Gla $i @L SL soeeeeene=** We Sedne oV9 crit Cyl 68 68 G68 6&3 seeseeess*s Sst Usipuy SCT 7 SCT a ssesesessees Tony WION 199T "S88 TOL 88 POT 99— 99T SOE LOT Gri cor Zo OOT PPI Sees eeeesoess* JI0jqUeIT 129 G6 GE Oct SEE SIT sores ess ** SiFAseoq 1004 95 ee ee +ss+ss> mrupssisury “os OLs'2 SL OF SEL Sv 60S 899 169 GLL €O0L 199 222 S28 eons ese seeseres >> F1MoG 186 Tcl Tol LEE TSE Ge GL SOE Tr i OTL aoe BE Hie ft TOL OOL ci £9 GG OS Se 6 SL GF GS PL OG GET SOF oe BUSCAR ecct G6 G6 Is cl ter TOL S6 06 Ss $8 $38 383 = SUE OH cart 6cL Gol Sck 9&1 98. GL GL 16 16 901 St St ee 16 1 so eceesees** 20qUNn WOR OLET 66 66 66 66 86 86 SG 36 co ¢3 99 Gs Ss 13 is 8 sees eee > OfFAnO}0. egg 66 86 86 86 86 GL ~~ a nc: peu te 08 62 82 Je 92 So te Go Ge te Oc GE St LE 9F GF *r er at I O16 8 £ 8S S&S FF & SG FE PieH BOnwS SIG) 1090.1, Gi yc Oc6L ANODE FO BLNOW sor WYGaa. LLod VIA avOullvu AUNIVN 2 NOLSOd OL ANGATIOM HOue GIG Savy 15 OV Ger ces — 906 @ =A 48 $cG Fe S26%e SPPT Saal tric cel Gk0c Gee Strc GOLc Bel Pay CoS 7Co Vos 62 iz 8h 66 cr 69S 0S9 999 GLE GopE "COL Os 0S ss5s** "> TigploIsmy OF CIP ce Ss cs cS cs eeosvoseveev eee eos? BIAU eq POGL GPE OOL GLI OLE OGE SPE SOT OST peserseee=*> SfAtaplEy Gd co sess *""T9ATu BooleS ON 969 is 38 38 18: «(«8:Cs CB US s+¢%s**-*g1kq J10q ON Suo [6 ci 6G 66 oVt OP eeeeeeees>* 5p gascues O0¢ 09 09 09 09 09 Sa ose esersessoo>> TIODIOL OGY O) OL 0) OL OL OF coveeosesseveosssses SpA Jue i 9 9 © © Seseeesss>* piInzZoJUOW GLE oo 2a co cd co co oe eseeess* IGA BooudG O88 5) 92 9h 9h OL Seeeeeress* Sok WINS TS0% O62 OGL OGLE F6L tre tre Sie L9G 192 ones seers ceves>* WIEN Cs ae se+ss22" ApGoloqog OF £96 Se 88 S86 86 LOL LOL LOL LOT LOT 69 69 69 69 # ote esses eee anes 81805 SLL orp 29 22 2h Lh Lh rh Lb 2b Op 887-9" Ti Seq GSEE GL cL Gh Zh Gl Gh Gh Gb GL GL GL GL cc 02 SS &8 -sse****onea SII, OS GIT oa fg totes? FtopquEs A S08 GEL Jer oo 5 TOL LOL GOL 6ol °° °° **** = BHO ves | | SL 82 82 GFL Spl °° * OsBD Beppu Tset 86 86 86 86 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Te 086 «68 «#68 68 GL Si GL Gh 96 GL SL $2 $60 °° OT Auo Ng Wizt SL SS eS 99 96 98 9s 98 98 593 98 IZ iz 19 19 ic lz 6c °° tojany 105 02S 6c 6c 6a F FH GC cé SF cr oF 9%." O[fASooT1004 L098 Giz Scr $96 SPL C89 FOG 206 9c0L ege roe 6l6 Lec Lis THQ = 2M GVE or 68 +69 P OPd, eeseseeessess* STBTIDOM GIS ter 66 Tc 18 0 11 9 GSS SF Bz 6G °° BUA CT ee 06 @6 82 Ie 82 Go Fe 82 Ge Te Oc GL ST 21 OF St tt St at tr OF G 8 2 8 2 FY &B@ @ Ft Peo Foes a Gu ¥ 4 GvOudivu ANIVN * NOLSOd OL AHGATING HOM GIG suvv 0z6L ATONE AO HINON ‘LOf WYGuaLLOW VIA 16 OS SIE ezs = 906 @ shed Iep 289'Gz a oo y a 0c6E TSHOAVY AO HINOW WOOF WVYGuUaLLod VIA GvOaTiva GNivVAN NOTSOd OL ATHAVIGG BOA TIGH SUyo ¥89S6 6828 696s SElc IPGL G8S1 LG9T ce0l Gal OLF O6c StF Lee 9Lz 09S Zr OLS eS 96L GOL 189 SPOLOLOTSCOLLSGOL ~~~" s[BI0n, 69 ao pee saseseeesss IHBMDIOD 9VG G Gs Gs seer ees eene*s* ABAUSOIY AS 1st Tat | PEA SUS 904FT 00S SUL S9L cS Gs Sree Goeeesssss* TOpSIRT LOL OF GG @eesseeses senses 6 suja105 58 oR oe BIsOe ie it See eeeeeeeeeees Tenure Oo G8 °° ***°*** meprojeury og O62 SFL SFL $2 oe eeees-ees> TosdmoUL er a) OD So ae esse seeneseeaes Gao 30G te St ie Or Of GE GG OTR ne JSP OSSE GOL OLL GZ GSt OFT OFT 26 Sct co Gr tL SL S¢ 0S YL ~~” * OiffAuopiey 19g 28° 28 18 ~~" OA F107 ON SsOE €?r GOL Pcl Gl 6L GG O06 EP GL YS Go 9G GE Gl GL TL $L 06 ~~~ °°°°** ‘of Sosouey vw LG LG Ss 9002 2eesesss GIGqsTOM G&L 9L «92 Seco eeeteeeeeses J5IG0In Go Go oe eeseesss= tu JoAbon St co GG S08 see eeeeeeesssy 4onm te te Sees eeesesesse AvpYyOoH 709 SOL GUL 76 GP CP COL GOL eesee eee ee eee yAIBMON Vol Go Go Soe eeseeeseees Ste SOOT Gel cet cet cel 19 PL PL SL Sh SL SG ere e sees * B)80% L9G cy CG) cL ar eseoeee884666 lito SOqEAT, 963 Ss tS s8 €s8 cs &s GL Ch Gh ~~" “ "Sijea enI1y OS 66L— tec too Gol Lér 36 86° °«ZOT cs Lc were eee es > F10F NURIA OSST Sci OL FOL PEE SOT OOT SOL 88 G6 16 6 1 Go SG PLO ConA 0c9 SS 9 Yr OF cll vel Gel GS | so 26ssess* Sriseo Uvipul LLG GL Gh Gh Gh GL GL GL SLO Tepe S90T 68 68 68 68 6S 68 68 6S 63 68 GS °*-* otAuojjng 626 Ss os 77 cy GL GL GL SL 82 CL S82 SL ~-"°****** asjuny j10n 006 ~—«GS SSS) GOL SIE cS) 6201 G9 )6(C08)SC GP cv Gy GY «CGY sees ****** SfTASOST.100 A. 9csL OGY SLS 6G GcL S19 96F Teo V8G Livy SIy GLE SLS FH9 Per SFL “°° °-°"*"*"""*** Jaime GLIt Si O02 OL $2 SS 2S 92 82 91 3 & GL Gp * SUBIIOH Z99T 781 GS Vel 79 WS LI OEE FEL SLIT GEL Sar oh 6ST GV LT poses sees eee s* BuoALY PIS te O05 Ga 86 244 9¢ £6 te 6 Go te Of 6E St 21 9F St Fe St a i oL1 6 vv & 6 Tf | PIP FRETS S.1BQ) [810,1, . a 17 OF 699° 01g—906 @ sAvq IED 90F ST o07'ST Zig il OF 21 21 #6 1S TPE SST &2 6901 GOCT L161 190c Glzc 968c 968c cle TO, Gea 9 92 OL 9£ GL 9L 94 °° °° °° "soy GGa 9£ 92 92 92 92 92 92 ~~~" “aa7E0p GST We 12 12 Ie le 1g 12 ~~" “omg ver Zo 29 «29 29 co 2O 2o °° °° “supe LG te te Te Te Te t 1¢ ~~~" Apron 2 w6 6 66 66 G6 66 66 °° x seq Ole G9 95 GS ZO Zo °°" °~° Wed scAtog OCS it & % Ww Hh hh a -- -yeurora) 9 z Z z : == >>>**-aTodspea PHOT SFE SFL StL StL Stl SF SPI “= *>*>-Tosdmio1 7, va0 28 28 oS os es zs 2s ws °° AeMucsID AGG Oo, oi 9g poo * Tn Soy, 509 OF G9 Tl 19 ISt 19. °° PON Sea OMIT O65 Zo Zel Zel Sel cel ee 5780 5 aut GL 82 82 82 oh °° “Sea ITT OS Toy 69 69 69 69 69 92 °""""°*°"*"“seyeMppD SUL Sol G01 SG ZPL JEL Sol °° °° BON Cue SE FL «0c «6G «CGL:«SCGSL SOP conoueD 7e0T 98 S801 891 SOE SOL 891 Sol "°°" ~~ mopeoupy Ble li # Te £1 2 61 °°“ Opegng Gq Eo So Jak zo zo Ze 66 92 69 “>> -* = -gi[tAtiaprer) Tit a t UL LL : o5 622+ >.-FamEIOG 1261 cl Gi Tk Of Zi 2 IT 18 iPr Ser Vel Yeo Yeo Pee eo tec Voc — Hopueny, O29 08 99 iz 621 Si G21 °° on ave 09 09 09 9 °°°°°°*°onsep uempuy Iz re OST re TOy e 18 ae 98 «Sess ">> **To7UNT 910.4 VAG ez 0 OF 6h 69 ~°°°°°**°° o[fAsooq100,4 bre G02 gor 9G Ole geo Gee yec ore °° Mo OVE oF Ze Tt Gi LL 6, "°°" ”**"** -susmpopy GAY 02 € O08 Gf 8 79 Ze Oct GL Syl °°" Gusaey 0€ @4 8 % 82 Ge te S 2 12 Oc GE St ZT OF ST FE St Zloitsé«oO!r 6 & «£2 «8 §$ F & 2 | pro PrH ton‘, SIGQ 18j07, aby a 026 WaENaldas 70 HLNOW SLOf WYGCHELLOH VIA GvOadliva GNIVA FY NOLESOd OL AMHATIGG HOd GIHH SAHVO is 08 82S P$= 906 @ Seq 38D Ze0G Ze09 | | 79 29S 09 979 OF 909 199 OOF GOD SIz ¥9c cez ““Ty.LOL 7 : a a ¥9g 69 89 $8 79 20 ic OF FL ZG ee suoAey 199° iz @ce ISL P31 TAL 092 O91 2ST ee == -aq1ocy Sal | i € 81 wh oOs ze At Tt +++**-S9piig worsuedeng iz | 0¢ OF && 88 92 SI & ee opeyng seq 389 Oct Tl Tet SZt OF CO e]LAtepzey DZ a Apsyetleyog “Og - re an a | a ee ne 7 1Z a Oe GO So Re eee eee ees se susas Tepaey 008 | ly 1 i tw Of OF Se Se 0 ee STTAssoq100 4 £19 | | G ie 0€ 16 Of Of G Of 82 26 84 84 SUuUE OH Pew I OF 6c $c 42 92 2 t6 t4 CQ Ie OG GE SE 21 Of Si FE SE cl TE OF G 8&8 2 Y GS Fr FE oc +t SIIB [679.1 OTH NOLLY.LS aby d 0c6. HHAOLOO AO HINOW “LO WYGUaLLOW VIA GVYOUTIVY ANIVW ¥ NOLSOD OL AUBATING Youd ATaH suvo 13 0026 299 ST IZ¢ 289 L¥9 OS? Z6E 1966 1 ZL6 61 (Zs oc SPs 026 896 $19 J&P 118 688 688 998 9Fo 999 s69 02100 F1$= 906 @ SAvq ID J6G°cT J6S peS S9S 169 6E9 219 Sco SEZ 00S 1201828 188 969 €Z Str €s¢ ¢29 06° Shc$= 906 @ SAGq ISD Tz Ozl 601 ZF 0 100 S$= 906 @ sAeq iD 1EG"¢ Ell 196 LOS Ive Sop O99 Icr Gch 816 869 0S 28S$= 906 @ SAvq IeD 179 06799 c$= 906 @ s4eq 18D 1962 99 SI SI 8 TZ 81 82 IS GIE TS1 Zit 98 ZL SOL SS Z& ZIT 901 ZEIT S86E Ose S9S 802 0% Go 7 29 St 00082 8$= 906 @ sAvq 18D 0026 08 P16 21$= 906 @ s4eq TeD 7/661 GEL 069 828 998 9&8 G6G0T SSII 9911 Fall OOTI IGTI PL71 PSZ1 LOST COOL Strl G69 2S 06 §82$= 906 © SAvq ID 118 962 G1S 09 12$= 909 @ sAvq 18H 9¢ iS 0S Go 8¢ 26 96 SC te 86 ce te Oc GE St Z2E Sf SE tr €1 Gt If OF G S$ 2 9 SG *F EF PPH S18) [BIO 7, aby da sLJf WYCeaLLod Vit QyOu UVa IVAiLNdOD MYOA MAN OL AWMATING HOt Au GNIVN FY NOLSOd NO GIA suvyo 95 959 cvs *< >? >> -a56 urepac}iow dadOLIO ++ += -a5p urepasqioy 2. s ddd Aa bds ee Af UTepsoy0rF LS Ony “gop Urep.i1e7 104] AIO “Gop WupieHoy anor "---4of mupieyow AVW "-40f urep1s}907 q1adv "40p Urepieyoy HOuvn "-90P Wepi9}}07y AMvoNdaa hd NOLLY.LS au OF TfPS= 906 © BAuq 2D LaF LcF ce 0 SS 7S #18 #2 S82 GL 26 ~~" “4qyI01 Loy Ge OF SS 9 #I€ Ig 82 62 16 """°"-°°-**--**: AGT, AVK 02919 1$= 906 © &Avq 185 GoR'T $98'T O1f OFT 901 49 49 29 62 SS se Ze Eee 35 99 09 GP SE 28 59 26 22 $9 2 SI 92 GIL ZIT Gor TV LOL OL Or OF OF OF Of OF OF ~~*-~*** -spunaig og _ c e e e ° c e C c . 7 sndosay £927 OLL GFT 901 79 79 #49 GL Ge Se Je Tc 87 99 09 Gh 86 28 29 6 GF Tr #6 & SL OOL POL OG AOL], TWHdV 0G SSF 1$= 906 © Sheq ere S70'T | SrOT ft Gel OSt 201 ZO SSE IfE GIL Zz SFL 611 OST TV TOL SPOT SEE Cel OSi ZOL ZO S8i IPE GIL Zz SHE GIL oct | 0a Kory HOUVA 09 C9IS= 909 @ seq 185 177 | Wz 1Z $9 Is o¢ — F¥L0L Lz tZ £9 18 “9c OO KOTT PPH AUVONaT a pm t6 0S GG 86 46 9% 82 #2 €2 Ze I2 Oc 61 Sl 21 OT st wr e122 ti OG 8S £ 9 © F S& & I [POE : aly a GTaH NOILVLS AOGL VIA GVOMIVa ANIVN ¥ NOLSOD OL AYGATIAG Boa Gian Bia V¥i) al ANON | GNONti<‘“‘“S™S™SOSS eee Oo CS$= "906 @ sAvq Te 46 CG CG eeses “NON 2 06°97$= 906 @ sheq TeD TG 1G Ie sees 02°602$= 906 © s4eq 18D fez | £&2a Til GoL eeseecse 06°S72 01S = 906 @ s4eq 18D 122 11 1cZ 11 eos zor 98F Zoe SSS O8o Fas 909 662 00L 219 TIZ $69 S79 229 €19 GZS 2co 92F Zig Foe °° = = | OS 208$= 905 @ s4eq 18D 168 268 | 62 tL ch Sh $8 82 22 02 98 G62I 101 O22 9 8 PPH te O& 66 36 26 92 Go #2 $2 2 12 06 Gl St 2ZE 91 SE FE SI Gi TF OF G S$ £2 9 GS FF € SF T Biv) TeIOL | aly dad AOGL VIA GyOullya TVSINGO MHOA MAN OL AUAAITAG AOA WH ANIVA ¥ NOISOG NO ATado Suvo ("THR NOLLY.LS aa W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 141 Central Watlroad Co. of New Persey CENTRAL BUILDING 143 LIBERTY STREET Ti. G. Dealer, General M ‘ President & General Manager NEw YORK, January 18, 1921. Mr. W. H. Williams, Chairman of the Board, Wabash Railway Company, 120 Broadway, New York City. Dear Sir: In accordance with request contained in yours of the 6th, I hand you herewith statement dealing with embargo restrictions placed by the New Haven and Central New England Railroads during the years 1916 to 1920, inclusive; the number of cars held for movement via the Maybrook and Harlem River routes, etc. This data has been worked up along the lines of data received with yours of the 6th. Yours truly, W. G. BESLER, President & General Manager. SUMMARY SHOWING ToTAL NUMBER OF Days RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR Points IN NEw ENGLAND—ROUTED VIA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, New York, New Haven & HARTFORD RAILROAD, CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY, AND LEHIGH & NEW ENGLAND RAILROAD. Years 1916 To 1920, INCLUSIVE. Account Account Account NYNH&HRR CRR of NJ L&NE Years CNE Embargoes Embargoes Embargoes 1916 265 18 18 1917 331 38 0 1918 228 0 0 1919 12 0 0 1920 396 86 0 1232 142 18 Otay ane eee SEO Oe eee ea ee aie 1892 Days Less account overlapping embargoes__________-------------+--------- 269 “ Grand total days restricted during five year period ________--____-__ 1123“ On an average of SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR PoINTs IN NEw ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY N.Y.N.H. & H. RaIbLRoap, CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RatLway, L. & N.E. RAILWAY, AND BY CENTRAL RAILROAD oF NEW JERSEY DURING THE YEAR 1916. TRAFFIC RESTRICTED. Account N. Y., N. H. & H. and C. N. E..-__- ee 265 Days “ Ce Per E IN 325) atcha len alan wn ten ee 18 =“ ts Mei ig sei ee ee else eg Sg ee ea 18 “ 301 “ Less account overlapping embargoes_____________.-_-________ 33 CSS otal: days.restrictéd. 223255 o 58s oseco jaca ose eee ete oe 268 “ STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE NEw YorRK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD, AND CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILROAD, DURING THE YEAR 1916, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended CNJ. Em- Modified bargo No. or Cancelled. Resume of Embargo. 3895 Dec. 27th, Placed account of storms and accumulation of loaded cars. Embargo car- 1915. load and less carload freight except live stock, perishable, food products for human consumption and coal for all points west and exclusive of New London and Willimantic and South of the line of the Boston & Albany R. R. All freight for Pittsfield, Holyoke, Westfield, and Northampton, Mass. and Hartford, Conn. will be accepted. All freight billed prior to and including December 27th, for embargoed territory will be received. Extended With the exception of live stock, perishable food stuffs for human consump- Dec. 31st, tion, coal, coke, and newsprint paper, all freight from connecting lines 1915. only for points on the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, south of line of the Boston & Albany R. R., and west of the line of the Central Vermont Ry. will not be received. 2 Dates placed. Extended CNJ.Em- Modified bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo Extended The following stations are not included in the foregoing: Dec. 31, 1915. Pittsfield, Springfield, Hartford, Westfield or points North of Westfield, all stations East of the line of the Central Vermont Ry., all stations on the Central New England Ry. No restriction is placed against traffic passing over the New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. or Central New England Ry. interchanged between other lines when either is the intermediate carrier in either direction, nor when moving via New England Steamship Company or its connection. Cancelled January 12, 1916. 3952 January 12, Placed account of accumulation of cars and resulting congestion, embargo 1916. all carloads and less than carload freight originating west of the Hudson River and north of the international boundary line destined to all points on or via N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. and Central New England R. R., except live stock, perishable food stuffs for human consumption, feed for live stock, coal, coke and petroleum products in tank cars. This includes busi- ness from west of the Hudson River moving in connection with the New England Steamship Company to points on the N. Y., N. H. & H., and busi- ness coming via Coastwise Steamship Lines. Cancelled February 28, 1916. 4126 February 22 Placed account accumulation of freight, embargo all carload and less than 1916. carload freight, via all junction points, whether on through billing, or reconsigned or reshipped or for switch delivery on these companies rails, at junction points. EXCEPTIONS: Live stock, perishable, food stuffs for human consumption, feed for live stock, newsprint paper for domestic use only, charcoal, fuel oil and gasoline in tank cars. Modified To permit coal for use of the Hudson River State Hospital, Poughkeepsie, March 1, N. Y. 1916. Modified To permit acceptance field and garden seeds. March 2, 1916. Modified To permit acceptance of coal for New Haven R. R. and C.& N. E.R. R. March 4, Also coal for the use of public utilities, and asphaltum in tank cars. 1916. Modified To permit acceptance carload and less carload shipments of fertilizer and March 8th, manure including nitrate of soda and agricultural lime and sanitary lime 1916. for sewerage precipitation purposes for all stations and connections, coal destined to stations on the N. Y., N. H. & H. and Central New England R. R., only when consigned to Hospitals, Asylums, Schools and_ Public Utilities, the latter includes water, gas, electric light and street Railway Companies. Cancelled March 15th, 1916. CNJ. Em- bargo No. 4212 4280 4301 Dates placed. Extended Modified or Cancelled. March 15th, 1916. Cancelled March 30th, 1916. March 30th, 1916. Cancelled March 81st, 1916. March 8lst, 1916. Cancelled April 4th, 1916. Resume of Embargo Embargo all carload and less than carload freight via all junction points when far points on or via the N. Y., N. H. & H., and C. N. E. Railroads, EXCEPTIONS: foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for live stock, perishables, live stock, field and garden seed, fertilized including agricul- tural lime, stable manure, nitrate of soda, and hardwood ashes, fuel oil in tank cars, gas oil in tank cars, fuel coal for use of these companies, fuel coal for bonafide use of hospitals, asylums, schools, public utilities including water, gas, electric light and Street Railway Companies. Printing paper for domestic newspapers and magazines, freight consigned to or for use of U. 8. Government, sanitary lime for sewerage precipitation purposes, freight from connecting rail lines for local delivery on these companies rails at Junction points with said lines, freight for all stations on the C. N. E. Ry. west of Canaan, Conn. and Hopewell, N. Y., but not for recon- signment or reforwarding to reconsignment or reforwarding to points on or via the N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through bill- ing, reconsigned or reshipped whether offered by rail switching service or teamed. EXCEPTIONS: foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for live stock, perishables, live stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, including agricultural lime, stable manure, nitrate of soda and hard wood ashes, fuel oil in tank cars, gas oil in tank cars, fuel coal for use of these companies, fuel coal for bonafide use of hospitals, asylums, schools, public utilities including water, gas, electric light and Street Railway Companies. Print- ing paper for domestic newspapers and magazines, freight consigned to or for use of the United States Government, sanitary lime for sewerage precipitation purposes. Freight from connecting rail lines for local delivery on these companies’ rails at junction points with said lines. Freight for all stations on the C. N. E. Ry. west of Canaan, Conn., and Hopewell, N. Y. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed. EXCEPTIONS: food stuffs for human consumption, feed or food for animals or poultry, perishables, live stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer including agricultural lime, manure, nitrate of soda and hardwood ashes. Copper in carloads, spelter in carloads, lead in carloads, fuel coal for use of these companies fuel coal for bonafide use of hospitals, asylums, schools, public utilities including water, gas, electric light and Street Rail- way Companies. Printing paper for domestic newspapers and magazines in carloads, box shooks and box boards in carloads, agricultural insecti- cides, insect repellants or vermin exterminators or fungicides. Bleaching powder and caustic soda in carloads. Petroleum and petroleum products in tank cars, freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Government, sani- tary lime for sewerage precipitation purposes.—Carload Freight from connecting rail lines for local delivery on these companies’ rails at junction points of said lines. Freight for all stations on the C. N. E. Ry. west of Canaan, Conn., and Hopewell, N. Y. CNJ Em- bargo No. 4317 4330 Dates placed. Extended Modified or Cancelled. Resume of Embargo. April 4th, 1916. Cancelled Apr. 7th, 1916. Apr. 7th, 1916. Cancelled Apr. 138th, 1916. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed. EX'CEPT: embargo will not apply on freight from CONNECT- ING RAIL LINES via any junction point where joint through rates apply when destined to the following points, EXCEPT when for reconsignment, reforwarding or reshipment from said points to other destinations. Bos- ton, Mass., Framingham, Worcester, Springfield, Westfield, Pittsfield, Lowell, Fitchburg, Holyoke, Northampton and all other points that are junction points with the N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. and other carriers. EXCEPTIONS: food stuffs for human consumption, feed for animals or poultry, perishables and livestock, seeds (field and garden) nursery stock, agricultural lime, stable manure and hardwood ashes. Cop- per, spelter, pig lead, crucibles, (carloads) coal for company use, for hos- pitals, asylums, schools and public utilities. Printing paper, except for ex- port (carloads) tree spray material, bleaching powder, caustic soda, whit- ing, lamp black, soda ash, petroleum and petroleum products in tank cars. Freight for use of the U. S. Government. Freight from connecting rails lines for local delivery on these companies’ rails at junction points of said lines. Freight for stations on the C. N. E. Ry. west of Canaan, Conn., and Hopewell, N. Y. Freight to or from points on N. Y. W. & B. Ry. Railroad supplies consigned to the New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed. Embargo will not apply on freight from connecting rail lines when destined to the following points EXCEPT when for reshipment from said points to other destinations, Boston, Mass., Framingham, Worcester, Springfield, Westfield, Holyoke, Pittsfield, Lowell, Fitchburg, Northampton, and all other points that are junction points with the N. Y. N. H.& H. R. R. or C. N. E. Ry. and other carriers. EXCEPTIONS: bleaching powder, caustic soda, whiting, lamp black, soda ash, coal for company use, for hos- pitals, asylums, schools and public utilities. Coke, charcoal, copper, spelter, zine, pig lead, crucibles, (carloads), fertilizer, fertilizer material, including agricultural lime, tobacco stems, stable manure, and hardwood ashes. Freight for use of the United States Government, freight from connecting rail lines for local delivery on these companies’ rails at junction points with said lines. Freight for stations on C. N. E. Ry. west of Canaan, Conn. and Hopewell, N. Y. Freight to or from points on N. Y. W. & B. Ry. Food- stuffs for human consumption, salt, milk bottles, petroleum and petroleum products in tank cars, perishables and live stock. Printing paper, except for export (carloads), seed (field and garden), nursery stock, agricultural implements for domestic use. Railroad supplies consigned to the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. RB. or C. N. E. Ry. Tree spray material. Iron and steel articles as follows: angles and rivets, band, bars, billets, bloom ingots, hoop, plate, rods, sheet, slab, structural, wire. CNJ Em- bargo No. 4353 4385 4429 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Apr. 13, 1916. Cancelled Apr. 18, 1916. Apr. 18, 1916. Modified Apr. 20, 1916. Cancelled Apr. 26, 1916. Apr. 26, 1916. Resume of Embargoes. Item No. 1. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to those companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail, switching service or teamed, when destined to Naugatuck, Waterbury, Waterville, Torring- ton, Bristol, New Britain, or Hartford, except as follows: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, copper, spelter, zinc, pig lead and crucibles (carloads) coke and charcoal, coal for hospitals, asylums, schools and public utilities. Printing paper (carloads) commodi- ties movings in tank cars, pig, scrap iron and scrap brass household goods, freight for use of the United States Government. ITEM NO. 2. Em- bargo is placed upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement coming to those companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped, except as follows: Bituminous coal, anthracite coal, lumber and cement will be accepted to the extent daily of one third the average daily receipts from each connecting line during April, 1915 provided that this item (Item No. 2) will not apply on traffic whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped when destined to Naugatuck, Waterbury, Waterville, Tor- rington, Bristol, New Britain or Hartford. ITEM NO. 3. Embargo is placed upon all freight when consigned to “Order notify,” 2 or so otherwise consigned as to establish the fact that the freight is intended for delivery subject to draft through a bank or other collection agency, PROVIDED that this item (Item No. 3) will not apply in the case of “Sight or Demand Draft to Order” shipment if billing bears notation that the shipment is under “Sight or Demand Draft” and in accord with similar endorsement on bill of lading issued at the point of shipment. Upon all freight tendered for shipment at point of origin after Apr. 19th, coming from connecting lines to the Harlem River or Maybrook Gateway. To permit bituminous coal, anthracite coal, lumber and cement to the extent daily of one-third the average daily receipts from each connecting line during April, 1915, provided that this (Item No. 1) will not apply on traffic whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped when destined to Waterbury, Torrington or Hartford. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, also by water craft via Belle Dock, New Haven, Conn. whether on through billing reconsigned, or reshipped except as follows: Lumber and cement for all stations except Waterbury, Hartford and Torrington will be accepted to the extent daily of one-third of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during the corresponding period of 1915. Bituminous and anthracite coal when consigned to and for the use of hospitals, asylums and schools will be accepted. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, also from lighter or when coming from coastwise or ocean steamship lines through or via Piers Nos. 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 or 70 East River, or Harlem River or Brooklyn Terminals, whether on through billing reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed when destined to Waterbury, Hartford and Torrington, Conn., except as follows: Perishable and livestock, food- stuffs for human consumption, coal for hospitals, asylums and schools, 6 CNJ Em- bargo No. 4495 4539 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Cancelled May 4, 1916. May 4, 1916. Cancelled May 11, 1916. May 11, 1916. Cancelled May 18, 1916. Resume of Embargoes. printing paper, commodities moving in tank cars, household goods, scrap brass and German silver scrap (carload) freight for U. S. Government, copper, spelter, zinc, pig lead and crucibles (carload). ITEM NO. 3. Upon all less than carload freight other than perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, printing paper, household goods, and freight for the United States Government coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines or when coming from coast- wise or ocean steamship lines through or via Piers Nos. 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 or 70, East River, or Harlem River, whether on through billing reconsigned or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed, except that L. C. L. freight will be accepted for movement via the New England Steamship Company or when for delivery at Harlem River, N. Y. or at Piers Nos. 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 or 70, East River, New York or when destined to Pittsfield, Westfield, Holyoke, Springfield, Northampton, Worcester, Fitchburg, Lowell, Framingham, Boston, Mass., and Willimantic, Conn. ITEM NO. 4. Upon all freight when consigned to “Order Notify” or so otherwise consigned as to establish the fact that the freight is intended for delivery subject to draft through a bank or other collection agency, provided that this (Item No. 4) will not apply in the case of “Sight or Demand Draft to Order” shipments if billing bears notation that the shipment is under “Sight or Demand Draft” and in accord with similar endorsement on bill of lading issued at the point of shipment. Upon all bituminous coal and anthracite coal, lumber and cement via any junction point except lumber and cement for all stations except Waterbury, Hartford, Torrington and Bridgeport, Conn. will be accepted to the extent daily of one-third of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May 1915. Bituminous and anthracite coal when consigned to or for the use of hospitals, asylums, and schools or for use of the New Haven or C. N. E. Ry. will be accepted. ITEM NO. 2. Carload and less carload freight coming via any junction point with connecting rail lines. EXCEPT: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, copper, spelter, zinc, pig lead, and crucibles (carload) coal for hospitals, asylums and schools. Printing paper, commodities moving in tank cars, scrap brass and German silver scrap (carload), household goods, freight for the United States Government. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement via all junc- tion points EXCEPT: lumber and cement for all stations except Water- bury, Hartford, Torrington and Bridgeport, Conn., will be accepted to the extent daily of one-third of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. Bituminous and anthracite coal when consigned to or for the use of hospitals, asylums or schools or for the use of the New Haven or C. N. E. Ry. will be accepted. ITEM NO. 2. Carload and less than carload freight coming to these lines via any junction point except: perishable and livestock, food for human consumption, copper, spelter, zinc, pig lead, and crucibles (carload). Coal for hospitals, asylums and schools, printing paper, commodities moving in tank cars, scrap brass, and German silver scrap (carloads). House- hold goods. Freight for U. 8. Government, CNJ Em- bargo No. 4577 4607 4614 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. May 18, 1916. Cancelled May 22, 1916. May 22, 1916. Cancelled May 24, 1916. May 24, 1916. Resume of Embargoes. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement, coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, also by water craft via Belle Dock, New Haven, Conn., whether on through bill- ing reconsigned or reshipped except as follows: Lumber and cement for all stations except Waterbury, Hartford, Torrington and Bridgeport, Conn., will be accepted to the extent daily of one-third of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. Bituminous and anthracite coal when consigned to or for the use of hospitals, asylums, schools, the N. Y.. N. H. & H. R. R. or C. N. E. Ry. or for delivery at stations upon the C. N. E. Ry will be accepted. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines also from lighter or when coming from coastwise or ocean steam- ship lines through or via Piers Nos. 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 or 70 East River or Harlem River or Brooklyn Terminals, whether on through bill- ing, reconsigned, or reshipped, whether offered by rail switching service or teamed when destined to Bridgeport, Waterbury, Hartford and Tor- rington, Conn., EXCEPT as follows: Perishables and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, copper, spelter, zinc, pig lead and crucibles (car- load), coal for hospitals, asylums and schools, printing paper, commodities moving in tank cars, scrap brass and German silver scrap (carload), household goods, freight for the United States Government. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines. Lum- ber and cement will be accepted to the extent daily of one-third of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. Bituminous coal will be accepted when consigned to or for the use of hos- pitals, asylums, schools, the New Haven or C. N. E. Ry. or for delivery at stations upon the C. N. E. Ry. Anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines, EXCEPT: foodstuffs for human consumption, perishable and livestock, printing paper, household goods, freight for U. S. Government, freight for use of the New Haven & C. N. E. Ry. Freight for movement via the New England Steamship Co. or for delivery at Harlem River, New York, Pittsfield, Westfield, Holyoke, Springfield, Northampton, Worcester, Fitchburg, Lowell, Framingham, and Boston, Mass. and Willimantic, Conn. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal, lumber and cement coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines. Lum- ber and cement will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. Bituminous coal will be accepted when consigned to or for use of the New Haven R. R. or C. N. E. Ry. also for other consignees to the extent daily of one-third the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. Anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. ITEM NO. 2. Upon less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail 8 CNJ Em- bargo No. 4630 4687 4697 4717 4748 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Resume of Embargo. lines, EXCEPT: foodstuffs for human consumption, perishable and live- stock, printing paper, household goods, freight for U. S. Government, freight for use of the New Haven or C. N. E. Ry. Freight for move- ment via the New England Steamship Co. or for delivery at Harlem River, N. Y., Pittsfield, Westfield, Holyoke, Springfield, Northampton, Worcester, Fitchburg, Lowell, Framingham, Boston, and Willimantic, Conn. Cancelled May 29, 1916. May 29, 1916. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines except: bituminous and anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during May, 1915. And anthracite or bituminous coal consigned to or for use of the New Haven or C. N. BE. Ry. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all less than carload freight coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines when destined to stations on the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. west of New London and Willimantic, Conn., EXCEPT: foodstuffs for human consumption, perishable and livestock, printing pa- per, household goods, freight for U. S. Government, freight for use of the New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. Freight for movement via the New England Steamship Co., Harlem River, N. Y., Pittsfield, Westfield, Holy- oke, Springfield and Northampton. : Cancelled June 12, 1916. June 12, 1916. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines EXCEPT that bituminous and anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during June, 1915, and shipments for N. Y., N. H. & H. and C. N. E. Rys. Cancelled June 15, 1916. June 15, 1916. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines EXCEPT that bituminous and anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during June, 1915, and shipments for N. Y., N. H. & H. and C. N. E. Rys. Cancelled | June 21, 1916. June 21, 1916. Upon all bituminous and anthracite coal coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines EXCEPT that bituminous and anthracite coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the average daily receipts from each connecting rail line during June, 1915, and shipments for N. Y., N. H. & H. and C. N. E. Ry. Cancelled June 28, 1916. June 28, 1916. Upon all bituminous coal coming to these companies via any junction point with connecting rail lines whether on through billing, reconsigned or reshipped EXCEPT: bituminous coal will be accepted to the extent daily of fifty percent of the daily average receipts from each connecting rail line during June, 1915, and shipments consigned to N. Y. N. H. & H. and C. N. E. Ry. or for delivery at points on the C. N. E. Ry., or N. Y. W. & B. Ry. Cancelled July 10, 1916. CNJ Em- bargo No. 4752 4776 4836 4857 5230 5279 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. June 29, 1916. Cancelled July 10, 1916. July 10, 1916. Cancelled July 15, 1916. July 26, 1916. Cancelled Aug. 2, 1916. Aug. 2, 1916. Cancelled Aug. 9, 1916. Nov. 7, 1916. Cancelled Nov. 19, 1916. Nov. 19, 1916. Cancelled Dec. 4, 1916. Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of heavy passenger business due to troop movement and Fourth of July travel embargo all carload and less than carload traffic coming to these companies from connecting rail and steamship lines via Harlem River and Maybrook, New York EXCEPT: perishable freight and livestock, freight for the U. 8. Government and points in common with the B. & A. KR. R., B. & M. R. RK. C. V. R. R., and N. Y. C. R. R. and materials for New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. and newsprint paper. Upon all carload and less carload freight coming to these companies from connecting rail and steamship lines via Harlem River and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPT: perishable freight and livestock, freight for the U. S. Gov- ernment, freight for points in common with the Bangor & Aroostook R. R., B.& M.R.R., C. V. R. R., and N. Y. C. R. R. Materials and supplies for the New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. and newsprint paper. Upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies from connecting rail and steamship lines via Harlem River, N. Y. and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPT: perishable freight and livestock, freight for the U. S. Government, newsprint paper, material and supplies for New Haven and C. N. E. Rys. and freight for points in common with the B.& ALR. R, B. & M., C. V., and N. Y. C. R. R. Upon all carload freight coming to these companies from connecting rail lines via Harlem River, N. Y. and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTING perish- able freight and livestock, freight for the U. S. Government, printing paper, grain, flour, and coal. Materials and supplies for the New Haven and C. N. E. Rys. Placed account accumulation. Upon all carload and less than carload traffic coming to these companies from connecting lines via Maybrook, New York, and Harlem River, New York. Upon all carload and less carload freight originating at points outside New England States except freight for delivery at local stations on C. & N. E. Ry. in New York State. Perishables, livestock, freight for the United States Government, material and supplies for use of the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R., and C. N. E. Ry., news and book print paper, coal, coke, aad and fuel oil, foodstuffs for human consumption and feed for ivestock. 10 CNJ Em- bargo No. 5355 5407 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Dec. 4, 1916. Cancelled Dec. 11, 1916. Dec. 11, 1916. Modified Dec. 18, 1916. Cancelled Jan. 2, 1917. Resume of Embargo. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all carload and less carload freight coming to these companies from connecting carriers when originating at points outside New England States. EXCEPTIONS: Merchants and Miners Transportation Co., freight for delivery at local stations on C. N. E. Ry. in New York State, perishable, livestock, freight for the United States Government, material and supplies for use of the New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. News and book print paper, coal, coke, charcoal and fuel oil. Foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock. Placed account of accumulation upon all carload and less than carload freight coming to these companies from connecting carriers when origi- nating at points outside the New England States. EXCEPTIONS: fol- lowing traffic will be accepted when for points on the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. only: perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, material and supplies for the New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. freight consigned to the United States Government, coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, lumber, brick, sand, cement, copper, spelter, iron and steel. Freight for stations on the C. N. E. R. R. in New York State and less than carload freight except cotton. Account accumulation and labor trouble embargo less than carload freight except perishables destined to or intended for transfer at New Haven, Conn., Pawtucket, R. I., Worcester, Mass. and North First St., Brooklyn. To permit acceptance of less carload freight destined to or intended for transfer at New Haven, Conn. and Worcester, Mass. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY DURING THE YEAR 1916 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. 4063 4934 Feb. 14, 1916. Modified Feb. 17, 1916. Modified Feb. 25, 1916. Cancelled Feb. 29, 1916. Aug. 30, 1916. Cancelled Sept. 2, 1916. Placed account of accumulation. ; Upon all freight carloads and less carloads from all points consigned, reconsigned or to be reconsigned either via Easton and Maybrook or via Bethlehem Junction and Campbell Hall, and via Jersey City to points on or via Central New England or N. Y. N. H. & H. R.R., except foodstuff for human consumption and feed for livestock. To permit perishable freight, petroleum products for Public Service Com- panies or gas purposes and shipments consigned to U. 8. Government. To permit all freight from points on Central R. R. of New Jersey and connecting lines to come forward when routing by Bethlehem Junction, L. & N. E. R. R., and Campbell Hall, to points on Central New England and New Haven R. R. Placed account of accumulation, and in conformity with embargo issued by N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R._ Placed against all shipments consigned to or via the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. 11 STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY LEHIGH & NEW ENGLAND RAILROAD DURING THE YEAR 1916 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended, CNJ Em- Modified, bargo No. or cancelled. Resume of Embargo. 4254 Mar. 24, 1916. Placed account of congestion and due to failure of the Central New Eng- land R. R. to accept. Embargo all shipments of coal consigned, recon- signed, or to be reconsigned to or intended for the C. N. E. or N. Y.N. H. & H. R. R. when routing via Campbell Hall. Cancelled Apr. 11, 1916. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY, NEw YorRK, NEw HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD, AND CEN- TRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY, DURING THE YEAR 1917. Traffic Restricted. Account N. Y. N. H. & H...... 2.2... 331 days Account C. R. R. of N. J... eee 388 days 369 Less overlapping embargoes............... 50 days 319 STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD AND CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY DURING THE YEAR 1917 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. 5568 Jan. 2, 1917. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connections originating at points outside of the New England States. EXCEPTIONS: perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consump- tion, feed for livestock, starch, news and book print paper, fertilizer, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators and fungi- cides, material and supplies for the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry., coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, brick and other clay products, sand, cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, iron and steel, tin plate and tin cans, lumber including boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, cooperage stock and tanners’ Bark. All freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Worcester, Farmingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willimantic and all other common points, freight moving via the M. & M. T. Company, household goods, freight for stations on C. N. E. Ry. in New York State. Freight consigned the U. 8. Govt. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all less than carload freight. EXCEPT perishable, livestock, freight consigned for N. H. and C. N. E. Ry., and freight for U. S. Govt. Cancelled Jan. 13, 1917. 5642 Jan. 13, 1917. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight for, on or via these Companies’ lines from connecting rail carriers via Harlem River whether consigned direct, reconsigned or reshipped. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for hu- man consumption, feed for livestock, starch, news and book print paper, fertilizer, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, 12 CNJ Em- bargo No. 5735 5803 5904 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Cancelled Jan. 26, 1917. Jan. 26, 1917. Cancelled Feb. 6, 1917. Feb. 7, 1917. Cancelled Mar. 1, 1917. Mar. 1, 1917. Resume of Embargoes. and fungicides. Material and supplies for the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry. coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, brick, clay and clay prod- ucts, sand, cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, iron and steel, tin plate, and tin cans, lumber, including boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, coop- erage stock and Tanners’ Bark, all freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Worcester, Farmingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willi- mantic, and all other common points. Freight moving via the M. & M. T. Co., household goods, freight for stations on C. N. E. Ry. in New York State, freight consigned to U. 8. Govt., field and garden seed. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all freight, carload and less than carload, for points on these com- panies’ lines from connecting carriers via Harlem River or Maybrook. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human con- sumption, field and garden seed, feed, except hay, for livestock, news and book print paper, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin ex- terminators, fungicides, material and supplies for the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry. coal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, all freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willimantic, and all other common points. Freight moving via the M. & M. T. Co. Freight for use of the United States Government, freight for stations on the C. N. E. in New York State. Fertilizer, nursery stock, all freight for points on or via the B. & M. or C. V. Ry. Placed account of accumulation, due to weather and labor conditions. Upon carload and less carload freight for points on or via these com- panies’ lines coming from connecting carriers via Harlem River or May- brook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuff for human consumption, feed except hay, for livestock; news and book print paper, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, and fungicides, material and supplies for the N. H. and C.N. E. Ry. coal, coke and charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, copper, spelter, zinc, lead. All freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Williman- tic, and other common points, freight moving via M. & M. T. Co. freight for stationy on the C. N. E. in New York State. Freight consigned to ‘or for use of the U.S. Govt. Field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock. Placed account of accumulation, due to weather and labor conditions. Upon carload and less than carload freight for points on or via these com- panies’ lines coming from connecting carriers (including Coastwise Steam- ship Lines) via Harlem River, N. Y. or Maybrook, N. Y. The following traffic will be accepted: When for points on the N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R., C.N. E. Ry., Boston & Albany R. R. and C. V. Ry. only; perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, starch, agricultural insecticides, 13 Dates placed. Extended CNJ. Em- Modified bargo No. or Cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. insect repellants, vermin exterminators, and fungicides, implements and machines required for preparing soil. Material and supplies for the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry. coal, coke and charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, brick and other clay products, sand, cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, iron and steel, tin plate and tin cans, lumber including boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, cooperage stock, and tanners’ bark. All freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willimantic, and other com- mon points. Freight moving via M. & M. T. Co. Freight for stations on C. N. E. Ry. in. New York State. Freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt. Field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock and wool. NOTE: Perishable livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, tin plate and tin cans, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock and freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt. will be accepted when for points on or via the B. & M. R. R. Modified Mar. 5, 1917. To permit acceptance of less carload freight via Maybrook. Cancelled Mar. 14, 1917. 5947 Mar. 14, 1917.Placed account of accumulation, due to weather and labor conditions. Upon carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting carriers via Harlem River or Maybrook, N. Y. The following traffic will be accepted when for points on the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, C. N. E. Ry., B. & A. L. R. R. and C. Vt Ry. only; but not for points on or via the Boston & Maine Railroad whether consigned direct, reconsigned or reshipped. NOTE: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print papers, starch, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators and fungicides. Implements re- quired for preparing the soil. Material and supplies for the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. Coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars. Household goods, brick and other clay products, sand, cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, iron and steel according to published list, tin plate and tin cans. Lumber, including boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, cooperage stock and tanners’ bark. All freight for Pough- keepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Svringfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willimantic and all other common points, but not for reshipment or reconsignment. Freight moving via the M. & M. T. Co. Freight for stations on C. N. E. Ry. in New York State. Freight con- signed to or for use of the United States Government. Field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, wool. NOTE: Perishable, livestock, food- stuff for human consumption, feed for livestock, tin plate, and tin cans, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nurserv stock and freight consigned to or for use of the United States Govt. will be accepted when for points on or via the Boston & Maine Railroad. ITEM NO. 2. Account accumulation embargo is placed on less carload freight intended for transfer at Westchester Transfer, N. Y. except per- ishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, agricultural implements. material and sunplies for use of the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. tin cans for condensed milk, freight con- signed to or for use of the United States Government, field and garden seed, fertilizer and nursery stock. Cancelled Mar. 20, 1917, 14 CNJ Em- bargo No. 5974 6016 7027 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Mar. 16, 1917. Cancelled Mar. 20, 1917. Mar. 20, 1917. Cancelled Apr. 11, 1917. Apr. 11, 1917. Resume of Embargoes. Embargo all freight of any kind except milk for points on or via these lines including freight in transit. Placed account accumulation caused by interruption of train service on these roads and on connecting lines in anticipation of recently threatened general railway strike. Upon carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting carriers via Harlem River or Maybrook. EXCEPTIONS: The following traffic will be accepted when for points on the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R., C. N. E. Ry., B. & Al. R. R. and C. Vt. Ry. only; perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, starch, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminatiors and fungicides, implements and machines required for preparing the soil, material and supplies for the New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. Coal, coke and charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, brick and other clay products. Sand, cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, and crucibles. Iron and steel, tin plate and tin cans, lumber includ- ing boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, cooperage stock and tanners’ bark. All freight for Poughkeepsie, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holyoke, Springfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich, Willimantic, and all other common points. Freight for stations on the C. N. E. in New York State, freight consigned to or for use of the U. 8. Government. Field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, and wool. NOTE: Perishable, livestock, food- stuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, tin plate, and tin cans, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, freight consigned to or for use of the U. 8S. Govt. will be accepted when for points on the Boston & Maine Railroad. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting carriers via Harlem River or Maybrook. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consump- tion, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, starch, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, fungicides, imple- ments and machines required for preparing the soil. Material and sup- plies for New Haven and C. N. E. Ry. and B. & M. R. R. Coal, coke and charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, brick and other clay products, sand and cement, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, iron and steel, tin plate and tin cans. Lumber including boxes, box shooks, lasts, last blocks, cooperage stock and tanners’ bark. All freight for Poughkeepsie, Harlem River, Pittsfield, Westfield, Northampton, Holy- oke, Springfield, Armory, Worcester, Framingham, Milford, Ashland, Boston, Fitchburg, Clinton, Lowell, Norwich and Willimantic, and all other common points. Freight moving via the New England Steamship and M. & M. T. Co. Freight for stations on the C. N. E. R. R. in New York State. Freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt. Supplies consigned to the American Red Cross Society, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, wool. NOTE: Perishable, livestock, food- stuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, tin plate and tin cans, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt. and supplies consigned to the American Red Cross Society will be accepted when for points on or via the Boston & Maine R. R. 15 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7096 7148 7284 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Extended Apr. 19, 1917. Cancelled Apr. 21, 1917. Apr. 21, 1917. Cancelled Apr. 28, 1917. Apr. 28, 1917. Cancelled May 17, 1917. May 17, 1917. Cancelled May 28, 1917, Resume of Embargoes. To prohibit all eastbound less carload shipments moving via Maybrook, N. Y. also less carload shipments destined to or intended for transfer at Hartford, Conn. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload and less carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting carriers via Harlem River and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, and fungicides, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, implements and machines re- quired for preparing the soil, material and supplies for N. H., C. N. BE. and B. & M. Ry. Coal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, tin plate and tin cans, freight moving via the New England Steamship Co. and M. & M. T. Co. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload and less carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting carriers at all junction points. EXCEP- TIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators and fungicides. Field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, implements and machines required for prepar- ing the soil, material and supplies for the New Haven R. R. and C. N. E. and Boston and Maine Railroad, coal, traffic moving in tank cars, household goods, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, tin plate and tin eans. Freight moving via the M. & M. T. Company. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines com- ing from rail carriers via Harlem River, New York and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human con- sumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, field and garden seed, fertilizer, nursery stock, tree spray, implements and machines re- quired for preparing the soil, lumber, lime, crucibles, material and sup- plies for N. H. and C. N. E. and B. & M. R. R., coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, cement, copper, brick, spelter, zinc, lead, pig iron, structural steel, iron and steel rods and bars, tin plate loaded to a 60000 pound minimum or over, tin cans and glass containers for food products, wool, household goods and freight for common points. Embargo placed on less carload freight, except when consigned to the American Red Cross as follows: less carload freight via Maybrook, N. Y., except when loaded in straight cars. 16 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7346 7382 7484 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. May 28, 1917. Cancelled June 4, 1917. June 4, 1917. Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from rail carriers on coastwise steamship lines via Harlem River, N. Y. and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, food- stuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, field and garden seed, nursery stock, tree spray, implements and machines required for preparing the soil, lumber, crucibles, wool, house- hold goods, materials and supplies for the N. H. and C. N. E. and B. & M. R. R., coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, freight for common points. Embargo the following articles in carload lots regardless of point of origin, whether consigned direct, reconsigned or reshipped, except when loaded to marked carrying or practical loading capacity of ear, brick, cement, copper, fertilizer, granite, glass containers, hay and straw, lead, lime, lumber, iron and steel, iron and steel bars and rods, billets, ore, pig iron and steel, pipe, sheet steel, structural iron, wire, plaster, spelter, tin plate, tin cans, zinc. Embargo less carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers except when loaded to a 15000 pound minimum or over. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all carload and less than carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from rail carriers and coastwise steamship lines via Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Per- ishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for live- stock, news and book print paper, field and garden seed, nursery stock, tree spray, implement and machines required for preparing the soil, cru- cibles, wool, and household goods. Material and supplies for the N. H. R. R., C. N. E. Ry. and B. & M. R. R. Coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank ears, billets, copper, fertilizer, glass containers, spelter, tin plate, tin cans and zinc, also for freight for common points when loaded to marked carrying or practical loading capacity of car, June 18, 1917. June 16, 1917. Cancelled July 14, 1917. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points. EXCEPTIONS: Freight consigned to or for use of the U.S. Govt., for the American Red Cross Society, perishable, livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, news and book print paper, glass containers, copper, spelter, zinc, crucibles, field and garden seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, tree and other agricultural spray materials, implements and other machines required for preparing the soil, baskets, barrels, and fruit containers for shipping fruit and pro- duce, coal, coke, charcoal, traffic moving in tank cars, materials and sup- plies for the N. H. R. R., C. N. E. R. R. and B.& M.R.R., freight for common points. ITEM NO.2. Embargo is placed on less carload freight for points on or via these companies’ lines coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points, except that miscellaneous freight in quan- tities of 20,000 pounds or more will be accepted. 17 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7637 1733 7779 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. July 14, 1917. Cancelled July 30, 1917. July 30, 1917. Cancelled Aug. 10, 1917. Aug. 10, 1917. Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of accumulation. ; Upon carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River or Maybrook, N. Y. except: That this embargo does not apply against freight consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt., its Allies, or the American Red Cross Society and the following freight when loaded to the marked carrying or practical loading capacity of car will be ac- cepted when consigned to stations on the New Haven and C. N. E. R. R. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consump- tion, feed for livestock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, billets. Field and garden seed nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, fungi- cides, tree and other agricultural spraying materials. Implements or machines required for preparing the soil, baskets, barrels, and fruit con- tainers for shipping fruit and produce. Coal, coke, charcoal, traffic mov- ing in tank cars, materials and supplies for New Haven, C. N. E. and B.& M.R.R. Tin cans, glass containers, hemp and sisal, cement, freight for common points. ITEM NO. 2. Embargo is placed on less carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points except that miscellaneous package freight in quantities of 20,000 pounds or more will be accepted. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers via all junc- tion points except that this embargo does not apply on freight consigned to or for account of the United States Government, its allies, or the American Red Cross Society and the following freight when loaded to the marked carrying or practical loading capacity of the car, when con- signed to stations on the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. and Central New England Railway. EXCEPTIONS: perishable and live stock, feed for live stock, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, Agricultural Insecticides, Insect Repellants, Fungicides, Baskets, Barrels and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, hemp and sisal, materials and supplies for the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R., C. N. E. and B. & M. R. R., foodstuffs for human consump- tion, news and book print papers, crucibles, billets, vermin exterminators, tree and other agricultural spray materials, traffic moving and tank ears, tin cans‘and glass containers. Freight for common points. ITEM NO, 2. Embargo is placed on less carload freight (except perishable) coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points, except that miscellane- ous package freight in quantities of twenty thousand pounds or more, also cotton and cotton linters when loaded to a minimum of seventy-five bales per car will be accepted. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers via all junction points, except that this embargo does not apply against freight consigned to or for use of the United States Government, its allies or the American Red Cross Society and shipments of the following freight when loaded to the marked carrying or practical loading capacity of the car will be accepted when consigned to stations on the N. Y. N. H. & H. and C. N. E. R. R. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and live stock, food- stuff for human consumption, feed for live stock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, and billets, agricultural insecti- 18 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7835 7888 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Cancelled Aug. 22, 1917. Aug. 22, 1917. Cancelled Sept. 6, 1917. Sept. 6, 1917. Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. cides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, baskets, barrels and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin cans and glass containers, materials and supplies for the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R., C. N. E. Ry. and B. & M. R. R. ITEM 2. Embargoes placed on less carload freight (except perishable) coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply against freight consigned to or for use of the United States Govern- ment, its allies, or the American Red Cross Society and the following freight when loaded to the marked or practical loading capacity of the car will be accepted when consigned to stations on the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. and C. N. E. Ry. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and live stock, feed for live stock, news and book print papers, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, billets, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin ex- teminators, baskets, barrels and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin cans and glass containers, materials and supplies for the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R., C. N. E. Ry. and B. & M. R. R. Cement via Maybrook, N. Y., traffic moving in tank cars, leather, wool, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, fertilizers. ITEM No. 2. Embargo is placed on less carload freight coming from connecting line carriers at Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y. Placed account of accumulation. Upon ecarload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply against freight for the United States Government, its allies, or the Ameri- can Red Cross Society and the following freight when loaded to the marked carrying or practical loading capacity of the car will be accepted when consigned to stations on the N. Y. N. H. & H. and C. N. E. Ry. EXCEP- TIOMS: via Harlem River or Maybrook, N. Y. Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, food for live stock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles and billets, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, fertilizer, agricultural implements, field and garden seeds, baskets, barrels and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, charcoal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin plate, tin cans and glass containers, materials and supplies for N. H. and C. N. E. Ry. and B.&M.R.R. Freight for stations on C. N. E. in New York State, traffic moving in tank cars, leather and wool EXCEPTIONS VIA MAYBROOK ONLY: Cement, brick, clay, and sand, iron and steel, machinery, cotton when loaded to a minimum of sixty-five bales per car for one destination. ITEM 2. Upon less carload freight other than cotton destined to points on these lines via Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y., except when loaded to a minimum of twenty thousand pounds or more per car. Sept. 15, 1917. 19 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7922 7978 8067 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Sept. 15, 1917. Extended Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River, N. Y., and Maybrook, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply against freight for the United States Government, its allies or the American Red Cross Society. EXCEPTIONS: via Harlem River or May- brook, N. Y.: Perishable and live stock, foodstuffs for human consump- tion, feed for live stock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, billets, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin exterminators, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, fertilizer, agricultural implements, field and garden seeds, baskets, barrels, and other fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, charcoal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin plate, tin cans, and glass containers, materials and supplies for the N. Y. N. H.& H.R. R., C. N. E. Ry. and B. & M.R. R., freight for stations on C. N. E. in New York State, traffic moving in tank cars, leather, wool, cement, brick, clay, and sand, iron and steel, machinery. To prohibit less carload freight, coming to these companies from connecting Sept. 18, 1917.rail carriers via Harlem River R. R. EXCEPTIONS: Field and garden Cancelled Oct. 1, 1917. Oct. 1, 1917. Cancelled Oct. 22, 1917. Oct. 22, 1917. Modified Oct. 23, 1917. seed, perishable foodstuffs, freight consigned to or for use of the United States Government, its allies or the American Red Cross Society. Upon carload freight coming from connecting carriers at Harlem River and Maybrook, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply against freight consigned to the United States Government, its allies, or the Ameri- can Red Cross Society, and the following freight when consigned to the stations on the N. H. and C. N. E. R. R. EXCEPTIONS: via Harlem River or Maybrook, N. Y.: Perishable and live stock, foodstuff for human consumption, feed for live stock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, billets, agricultural insecticides, insect repel- lants, vermin exterminators, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, fertilizer, agricultural implements, field and garden seed, baskets, barrels, and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce. Coal, charcoal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin plate, tin cans, glass containers, material and supplies for the N. H.R. R., C. N. E. R. R. and B. & M. RB. R., freight for stations on the C. N. E. in New York State, traffic moving in tank cars, leather and wool. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River and Maybrook, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: via Harlem River or May- brook. Perishable and livestock, foodstuffs ‘for human consumption, feed for live stock, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, crucibles, billets, agricultural insecticides, insect repellants, vermin ex- terminators, fungicides, tree and other agricultural spray materials, fer- tilizer, agricultural implements, field and garden seed, baskets, barrels and fruit containers for shipping fruit and produce, coal, charcoal, coke, hemp and sisal, tin plate, tin cans, glass containers, materials and sup- plies for the N. H. R. R., C. N. E.R. R. and B. & M. R. R., freight for stations on the C. N. E. R. R. in New York State, traffic moving in tank cars, leather and wool. To permit acceptance via Harlem River of iron and steel, brick, clay, sand and machinery. 20 CNJ Em- bargo No. 8122 8157 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. Modified To permit all carload freight routed via Harlem River to come forward. Nov. 1, 1917. Extended Nov. 2, 1917. To prohibit less carload freight from connections via Maybrook, except when consigned to or for use of the U. S. Govt., its allies, or American Red Cross Society. ‘ Extended To prohibit less carload freight from connections at Harlem River when Nov. 3, 1917. to be transferred at Westchester, N. Y. , Cancelled Nov. 9, 1917. Nov. 2, 1917. Embargo placed against acceptance all less carload freight from the L. & H. at Maybrook, except freight for the U.'S. Govt., its allies, or the American Red Cross. Cancelled Nov. 15, 1917. Nov. 9, 1917. Embargo placed upon less than carload freight from connections'for trans- fer at Westchester, N. Y., or Maybrook, N. Y. Modified To permit less carload freight for transfer at Maybrook, N. Y. Nov. 18, 1917. Modified Nov. 15, 1917. To permit acceptance less carload freight for transfer at Westchester, N. Y. Cancelled Dec. 3, 1917. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED By THE C. R. R. oF N. J. DURING THE YEAR 1917 5694 5753 5870 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Jan. 22, 1917. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all freight from connecting lines destined to points on or via the N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. routing via Jersey City, except perishable freight and shipments consigned to the New Haven R. R. for the U. S. Gov’t. or officers thereof. Cancelled Jan. 27, 1917. Feb. 4, 1917. Placed account of accumulation, due to connecting lines inability to accept freely from us. Upon all freight to points on or via Central New England R. R. ‘and N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. routing via Maybrook, EXCEPT: anthracite coal, field seed, seed grain, nursery stock, fertilizer, shipments consigned to the U. S. Gov’t. or an officer thereof and supplies for the C. N. E. and N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. Cancelled Feb. 10, 1917. Feb. 17, 1917. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all shipments destined to points on or via the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. routing via Jersey City, N. J., or Communipaw, N. J., except: perishables, traffic moving in tank cars, and materials and supplies for the New Haven R. R. Cancelled Feb. 24, 1917. 21 CNJ Em- bargo No. 7557 7872 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. July 1, 1917. Cancelled July 11, 1917. Sept. 8, 1917. Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all freight and coal routing via Easton and L. & H., Maybrook and C. N. E. Ry., except: livestock and shipments consigned to United States Gov’t. or an officer thereof. On account of inability of connections to accept. Upon all traffic routing via the Lehigh & Hudson R. R., Maybrook and C. N. E. Ry. destined to points on or via the C. N. E. Ry. EXCEPTIONS: Field seed, seed grain, garden seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, perishable freight, foodstuffs, livestock, feed for livestock (except hay), printing paper, thin cardboard for manufacture of menus, calendars, etc., agri- cultural implements, spraying materials, tree sprayers, binder twine, traffic in tank cars, tin plate, baskets, barrels, and crates for shipping fruit and produce. Empty tin cans for packing shipments of canned foods when so waybilled, glass containers for food, materials, supplies and fuel coal consigned to railroad companies, all shipments consigned to the Western Union Telegraph Co. All shipments consigned to the U. S. Gov’t. or an officer thereof. All shipments for which bill of lading bears the U. S. Gov’t. contract. Sept. 18, 1917. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC For POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT E/MBARGOES PLACED BY THE CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, NEw HAVEN & HARTFORD AND CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY DURING THE YEAR 1918. Traffic Restricted Accoint:.Ny YN: He &-H genes ehee opens 228 days Account C. R. R. of N. J... eee 0 days 228 days Less overlapping embargoes............... 0 days Total days restricted................000005 228 days STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY NEw York, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD R. R. AND CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY DURING THE YEAR 1918 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO 8339 Jan. 3, 1918. NEW ENGLAND. Placed account of accumulation and due to weather conditions. Upon eastbound carload freight moving via Maybrook, except: perishable, livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, coal, fuel, oH and freight consigned to the U. 8. Gov’t., its allies or the American ed Cross. 22 Dates placed, Extended, CNJ Em- Modified, bargo No. or cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. Extended Jan. 5, 1918. Placed account of accumulation and weather conditions upon all eastbound carload and less carload freight ’'coming from connecting rail carriers at Harlem River, N. Y., except: perishable, livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, coal, fuel oil and freight consigned to the U. 8. Gov’t., its allies, the American Red Cross Society. Shipments for the N. Y. N. H. & H. and C. & N. E. Ry. Cancelled Jan. 17, 1918. 8449 Jan. 17, 1918. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all eastbound carload or less than carload freight moving via May- brook, Campbell Hall or Harlem River, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable freight, livestock, food‘and feed, coal, fuel oil, field seed, seed grain and fertilizer, news and book print paper, railroad supplies, freight for the U. S. Gov’t., its allies or the American Red Cross Society. Modified Jan. 18, 1918.To permit acceptance of eastbound less carload freight via Harlem River when for handling at Westchester Transfer. Cancelled Jan, 24, 1918. 8468 Jan. 24, 1918. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all eastbound carload and less carload freight moving via Maybrook and Campbell Hall, N. Y., except: freight consigned to the N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. and the C. N. E. Ry. ITEM NO. 2. Upon all carload freight moving via Harlem River, N. Y., except: perishable freight, ‘livestock, food and feed, coal, fuel oil, field seed, seed grain, fertilizer, news and book print paper, railroad supplies, freight for the U. S. Gov’t., its Allies or for the American Red Cross Society. Cancelled Feb. 6, 1918. 8503 Feb. 6, 1918. Placed account of ‘accumulation. Upon all eastbound carload and less than carload freight destined to points on or via the C. N. E. Ry. and the N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. via Maybrook or Campbell Hall, N. Y. ITEM NO. 2. Account of accumulation embargo all eastbound carload freight moving via Harlem River, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS:' Agricultural implements (required for spring planting), farm tractors, fertilizers and raw materials for use in manufacture thereof, insecticides and spraying materials or compounds, field and ‘garden seed, seed potatoes, nursery stock, livestock, fresh or cured meats, dressed poultry, fresh or frozen fish, fresh fruit or vegetables, butter, eggs, cheese, lard or lard substitutes, milk, fluid, condensed or ‘evaporated, flour, compressed yeast, salt, drugs and medicines and ingredients used in manufacture thereof, liquid chlorine for water works, coal, coke, cord wood, gasoline, lubricating oil, illuminat- ing oil in tank cars, news or'‘book print paper, printers ink, carbon black or lamp black, feed for animal or poultry consumption, supplies consigned to or in care of Officers of the U. S. Army or Navy or American Red Cross Society. Freight consigned to Railroad Officers for use of Railroad Com- panies. Cancelled Feb. 12, 1918. 23 CNJ Em- bargo No. 8584 8614 8626 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Mar. 18, 1918. Extended Mar. 19, 1918. Cancelled Mar. 24, 1918. Mar. 24, 1918. Cancelled Mar. 26, 1918. Mar. 26, 1918. Resume of Embargoes. Placed account accumulation. ; Upon all eastbound freight destined to points on or via these lines coming from connecting carriers at Maybrook, Campbell Hall, or Harlem River, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Live stock, perishables, coal, coke and charcoal, acids, alcohol, ammonia, light oil, benzol and toluol, petroleum and its prod- ucts in tank cars, empty tank cars, food, domestic, for human consump- tion, including wheat, corn, oats, rye, barley, rice, cereal products, salt canned goods, sugar, syrup, molasses, peanuts, vegetable oils, feed, domestic, for animals and poultry, not including hay and straw. Materials consigned to United States Government, or its authorized agents, including the public printer, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the Post Office Department, the Navy Department, Navy Yards, and Navy Stations, the Marine Corp, the American Red Cross, Imperial Munition Board of Canada. Shipments of steel, lumber, ‘ties and piling consigned to the United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corporation, Railroad material and supplies, other than coal or coke, when consigned to an Officer destined to a point on his ‘own line. Printing paper and printing ink. Scrap and waste paper when consigned direct to paper mills, or manu- facturers. Agricultural implements, and farm machinery required for preparing the soil. Binder twine, canning ‘machinery, carbide, carbon black, chrome, graphite, manganese, and pyrites ore, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, including agricultural lime and pulverized limestone, field and garden seed, seed grain, food containers, glass, wood, tin or paper, fullers earth, laundry soap, and soap powder. Medicines, drugs and surgical instruments, mine props, mine wagons, powder and other materials and supplies necessary for the operation of coal mines. Oil well supplies, spraying materials, including arsenic (basis for insecticides), and spray- ing implements, sulphur. Tanners’ extract, tin plate for manufacture of in cans. To prohibit acceptance of anthracite coal. Placed account of accumulation. Upon all freight destined to points on or via these lines, coming from connecting rail carriers at all junction points). EXCEPTIONS: Food- stuffs for human consumption, livestock and perishables, shipments con- signed to the United States Government or Officers thereof, its Allies, or American 'Red Cross Association, railroad supplies. Placed account accumulation. Upon all freight destined to points on via these lines coming from connect- ing carriers at all junction points. Also from coastwise ‘steamship lines. EXCEPTIONS: Live stock and perishable materials consigned to the United States Government, or its authorized agents, including the public printer, the Bureau of ‘Engraving and Printing, the Post Office Depart- ment, to the Navy Department, the Navy Yards and Navy Stations, to the Marine Corp, to the American Red Cross, to the Imperial Munition Board of Canada, shipments'of steel, lumber, ties and piling, consigned to the United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corporation, railroad material and supplies, other than coal or coke, when consigned to an officer, destined to a point on its'own lines. Field and garden seed, seed 24 CNJ Em- bargo No. 8629 8643 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Modified Mar. 27, 1918. Cancelled Mar. 29, 1918. Mar. 29, 1918. Extended Mar. 30, 1918. Cancelled Apr. 6, 1918. Apr. 6, 1918. Resume of Embargoes. grain, nursery stock, fertilizer and fertilizer materials, agricultural imple- ments, and farm machinery required for preparing the soil, printing paper and printing ink, hemp, sisal,'medicines, drugs and surgical instruments, bituminous coal, coke and’ charcoal. To permit acceptance of food, domestic, for human consumption, includ- ing wheat, corn, oats, rye, barley, rice, cereal products, salt, canned ‘goods, sugar, syrup, molasses, peanuts, vegetable oils, feed, domestic, for animal and poultry, not including hay or straw. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight, destined to points on or via these lines, coming from connecting ‘carriers, Maybrook, and Campbell Hall, N. Y,, or Harlem River, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Livestock, perishable, coal, coke and char- coal, acid, alcohol, ammonia, light oil (benzol and toluol). Petroleum and its products in tank cars, empty tank cars. Food, domestic ‘(not export), for human consumption, including wheat, corn, oats, rye, barley, rice, cereal products, salt, canned goods, sugar, syrup, molasses, peanuts, vege- table oils, feed, domestic (not export), for animals and poultry not includ- ing hay or straw. Materials consigned to the United States Government, or its authorized agents, including the Public Printer, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the Post Office Department, to the Navy Depart- ment, Navy Yards, and Navy Stations, to the Marine Corps, to the Ameri- can Red Cross, to the Imperial Munitions Board, Canada, and ‘shipments of steel, lumber, ties and piling consigned to the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. Railroad material and supplies (other than coal or coke), when consigned to an officer destined to a point on his own line. Printing paper and printing ink. Scrap and waste paper when consigned direct to paper mills or manufacturers. Agricultural implements and farm machinery required for preparing the soil, binder twine, canning machinery, carbide, carbon black, chrome, graphite, manganese, and pyrites ore. Fertilizer, fertilizer materials, in- cluding agricultural lime and pulverized limestone. Field and garden seed, seed grain, food containers, glass, wood, tin or paper, Fuller’s earth. Laun- dry soap and soap powder. Medicines, drugs and surgical instruments, mine props, mine wagons, powder, and other materials and supplies necessary for the operation of coal mines. Oil well supplies. Spraying materials including arsenic (basis for insecticides), and spraying implements. Sul- phur. Tanners’ extract. Tin plate for manufacture of tin cans. To prohibit acceptance anthracite coal. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload freight’ destined to points on or via these lines, coming from connecting carriers, at Maybrook, Campbell Hall, N. Y., or Harlem River, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Livestock, perishable, bituminous coal, coke and charcoal, acids, alcohol, ammonia, ammoniacal liquor, light oil (benzol and toluol), naphthalin, petroleum and its products. Empty tank cars. Empty metal, glass or jacketed oil, acids, gas, or ammonia containers. Food, domestic (not ‘export), for human consumption, including wheat, corn, 25 CNJ Em- bargo No. 8758 8881 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Modified Apr. 9, 1918. Modified May 9, 1918. Cancelled May 238, 1918. May 29, 1918. Cancelled June 11, 1918 Aug. 8, 1918. Cancelled Sept. 11, 1918 Resume of Embargoes. oats, rye, barley, rice, cereal products, salt, canned goods, sugar, syrup, molasses, peanuts, vegetable oils and lard substitutes. Feed, domestic (not export), for animals and poultry, not including hay and straw. Materials consigned to the United States Government or its authorized agents or officers, including the Public Printer, the Bureau of Engraving and Print- ing, the Post Office Department, the War Department (Army), the Navy Department, Navy Yards and Naval Stations, the Marine Corps. _Ship- ments consigned to or for account of the United States Shipping Board, Emergency Fleet Corporation. Shipments to the American Red Cross, the Imperial Munitions Board of Canada. Railroad material and supplies (other than coal and coke), consigned to an officer of the purchasing road at a point on such road. Materials and supplies for the maintenance and operation of Pullman cars. Materials'and supplies consigned to locomo- tive and car manufacturers for the construction and repair of locomotives and freight and passenger cars. Printing paper and pinting ink. Empty ink drums. To permit acceptance anthracite coal, acetate of lime, acetone, methyl acetone, chemical wood ketone, carbide, carbon black, chrome, graphite, manganese, pyrites, ores; copper, lead, zinc. Fertilizer, fertilizer ‘mate- rials, including agricultural lime, pulverized limestone, and phosphate rock, Fuller’s earth, liquid chlorine, alum, sulphate of iron and similar chemicals, when to be used 'for purification of public water supply, and when consigned to municipal authorities. Medicines, drugs, surgical in- struments and surgical dressing, spraying materials, including arsenic (basis for insecticides), and implements for spraying, sulphur. Tanners’ extract, agricultural ‘implements and farm machinery required for pre- paring the soil. Binder twine, canning machinery, electrodes, for smelt- ing purposes, field and garden seeds, seed grain, nursery stock, food con- tainers, laundry soap and soap powder, mine props, mine wagons, powder, and other materials and supplies necessary in the operation of coal mines, oil refineries, supplies for. Scrap and waste paper and other scrap stock for paper manufacture when consigned direct to paper mills or paper manufacturers. Supplies for oil and natural gas wells. Tin plate for manufacture of gas wells. Tin plate for manufacture of tin cans. Wood pulp. To permit acceptance iron and steel, cement, clay and clay products, sand, ‘spelter, asphalt roofing material and paper. ' Placed upon less carload freight from all connections except shipments for United States Government, its Allies, American Red Cross, for Y. M. C. A. at Army 'Cantonments. Upon less carload freight coming from connecting lines, via Maybrook, N. Y., except shipments loaded in straight cars to one destination for con- necting lines and shipments for'the United States Government, its author- ized agents, its Allies, American Red Cross Society, Y. M. C. A. and Army Cantonments, wool, ammonia cylinders and canning machinery. 26 Dates placed, Extended, CNJ Em- Modified, bargo No. or cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. 9002 Oct. 8, 1918. Placed upon all less 'carload freight from connecting carriers via May- brook, N. Y., except shipments loaded direct to destination or connecting road or for the U. S. Govt., its agents, its Allies, American Red Cross Society, Y. M. C. A. and Army Cantonments, ammonia cylinders, canning machinery. Cancelled Dec. 24, 1918. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC For PoINts IN NEw ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED By THE CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEw JERSEY, NEW YoRK, NEw HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD, AND CEN- TRAL NEW ENGLAND RAILWAY DURING THE YEAR 1919. Traffic Restricted. Account N. Y. N. H. & H....... ee. 12 days Account C. R. R. of N. J.... 0.0.00... hats 0 days 12 days Less overlapping embargoes............... 0 days Total days restricted.................00. 12 days STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES BY NEW YORK NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD AND CENTRAL NEW 9447 ENGLAND RAILWAY DURING THE YEAR 1919. Aug. 8, 1919. Placed account of labor trouble. : Eastern Region embargoes all carload and less carload freight including livestock and perishables from all connections consigned, reconsigned, or to be reconsigned, to all points on or via the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry. Modified To permit acceptance milk, non-perishable foodstuffs for human con- Aug. 12, 1919.sumption, feed for livestock, supplies including fuel coal consigned to the N. H. and C. N. E. Ry., and shipments authorized by J. O. Halliday, for the following commodities: ice, perishable foodstuffs, livestock, newsprint paper. Modified To permit acceptance of ice, foodstuffs for human consumption, livestock Aug. 18, 1919.and feed for livestock, material and supplies for N. H. and C. N. E. Ry., printing ink, news and book print paper, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, cru- cibles, coal, coke, charcoal, and fuel oil in tank cars, hemp, sisal, leather and wool, billets and tin plate, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments, and surgical dressings, freight consigned to U. 8. Govt. i Cancelled Aug. 20, 1919. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC For PoInts IN NEw ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE CENTRAL RAILROAD oF NEw JERSEY, NEw York, NEw HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD, AND CEN- TRAL NEw ENGLAND RAILWAY, DURING THE YEAR 1920. Traffic Restricted. Account N. Y. N. H. & H.... 2... ee eee 396 days Account C. R. R. of N. J... 0... eee eee 86 days 482 Less overlapping embargoes............. 186 days Total days restricted ............-000005 296 days CNJ Em- bargo No. Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD AND CENTRAL NEw ENGLAND RAILWAY (REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EASTERN REGION) DURING 9895 9942 143 144 THE YEAR 1920 RESTRICTINGTRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Jan. 26, 1920. Placed account of weather conditions and accumulation. Upon all eastbound carload freight for delivery to C. N. E. R. R. or N. Y. N. H. & H. RB. R. at Campbell Hall or Maybrook, N. Y., except livestock, perishable freight, newsprint paper, petroleum products, coal, coke, rail- road supplies, Government freight and freight covered by F. T. C. and G. O. C. permits. Extended To prohibit all eastbound carload freight except railroad fuel. Feb. 3, 1920. Modified To permit acceptance livestock, perishable freight, newsprint paper, pe- Feb. 4, 1920. troleum products, fuel oil in tank cars, coke, charcoal, railroad supplies and railroad fuel, Government freight, and freight covered by F. 1’. C. and G. O. C. permits. Modified To permit acceptance of bituminous coal. Feb. 21, 1920. Cancelled Apr. 12, 1920. Feb. 18, 1920. Placed account of weather condition and resulting accumulation. Upon all carload freight from connections at Harlem River, Jersey City, and Greenville except: livestock, perishable freight, newsprint paper railroad supplies including fuel, Government freight and freight covered by F. T. C. and G. O. C. permits. Modified To permit acceptance bituminous coal. Feb. 21, 1920. Modified To permit acceptance of foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, Mar. 29, 1920tank cars, loaded or empty, charcoal and coke, printing paper, printing ink, and empty ink drums. Copper spelter, scrap brass, lead and zinc. Medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and surgical dressings. Agricul- tural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying materials, canning machinery, tin plate for the manu- facture of tin cans, household goods. Modified Mar. 30, 1920. To permit acceptance of anthracite coal. Cancelled Apr. 12, 1920. Apr. 12, 1920. Placed account of labor trouble. Upon all east or westbound freight for or from Central R. R. of N. J., Long Island R. R. via Bayridge, Harlem River and Oak Point. Cancelled May 28, 1920. Apr. 12, 1920. Placed account of labor trouble. Upon all carload and less carload freight originating at or west of May- brook, Campbell Hall, Albany or West Albany. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, newsprint and printing paper, empty ink drums, medicines, drugs and surgical instruments and surgical dressings, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying materials, household goods and railway supplies. Cancelled Apr. 13, 1920. 28 CNJ Em- bargo No. 150 243 244 269 270 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. Apr. 18, 1920. Modified May 1, 1920. Extended May 8, 1920. Cancelled May 28, 1920. May 28, 1920. Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of labor trouble. Upon all carload and less carload freight originating at points west of Maybrook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., Albany or West Albany, except: food- stuffs for human consumption and railroad supplies. To permit acceptance of livestock, perishables, feed for animals, printing ink and printing ink drums, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and surgical dressings. Agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying materials. Coal, coke aad charcoal, tank cars loaded or empty, household goods, railroad supplies. To prohibit all freight except: foodstuffs for human consumption and rail- road supplies. Placed account of labor trouble and accumulation. Upon all freight, carload and less carload from the Pennsylvania R. R., Central R. R. of New Jersey, Lehigh Valley R. R., via Bayridge, Harlem River, for Oak Point, except, this embargo does not apply to coal, coke, and charcoal, freight in tank cars, foodstuffs for human consumption, rail- road supplies. June 10, 1920. May 28, 1920. Cancelled Placed account labor trouble and accumulation. Upon all freight, carload and less carload, from connections at Maybrook, or Campbell Hall, N. Y., exceptions: coal, coke and charcoal, freight in tank cars, foodstuffs for human consumption, railroad supplies. June 10, 1920. June 10, 1920. Modified June 23, 1920. Cancelled June 26, 1920. June 10, 1920. Extended June 23, 1920. Cancelled June 26, 1920. Placed account of labor trouble and accumulation. Upon all freight, carload and less carload from P. R. R., C. R. R. of N. J., and Lehigh Valley R. R., via Bayridge, Harlem River, or Oak Point. EXCEPTIONS: Foodstuffs for human consumption, railroad supplies, in- cluding fuel, also fuel for public utilities. To permit foodstuffs for human consumption, and fuel for public utilities, when destined to or routing via New Haven, Conn. Placed account of labor trouble and accumulation. Upon all freight, carload and less carload, from connections at Maybrook, or Campbell Hall, New York, EXCEPTIONS: Foodstuffs for human con- sumption, railroad supplies, including fuel and fuel for public utilities. To include foodstuffs for human consumption, and fuel for public utilities when destined to or routing via New Haven, Conn. CNJ Em- bargo No. 312 317 338 367 446 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or cancelled. June 26, 1920. Cancelled June 30, 1920. June 30, 1920. Cancelled July 12, 1920. July 12, 1920. Modified July 16, 1920. Cancelled July 21, 1920. July 21, 1920. Cancelled Aug. 25, 1920. Aug. 25, 1920. Resume of Embargoes. Placed account of labor troubles, upon carload and less carload freight, from connections routing via Bayridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, May- brook, or Campbell Hall, N.Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, Government treight, foodsiutis for human and animal consumption, medi- cnies, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fertilizer, fertilizer material, spray- ing materials, bituminous coal, coke and charcoal, freight in tank cars, household goods, ink drums and railroad supplies. Placed account of labor trouble, upon all carload and less carload freight, from connections, routing via Bayridge, N. Y., Harlem River, N. Y., Oak Point, N. Y., Maybrook, N. Y., or Campbell Hall, N. Y. EXCEPTIONS: Perishable and livestock, Government freight, foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, medicines, drugs, and surgical instruments and dressings, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying materials, bituminous coal, coke and charcoal, freight in tank cars, household goods, ink drums and railroad supplies. Placed account of accumulation and labor trouble. Placed upon carload and less carload freight from connections routing via Renssalaer, Albany, or West Albany, N. Y., Bayridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, Maybrook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply to perishable and livestock, Government freight, railroad supplies, foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, bituminous coal, coke, charcoal, cordwood, tank cars loaded or empty, medicines, drugs, sur- gical instruments and dressings, soap and soap powder, sulphur, tanners extract, printers ink, ink drums, carbon or lamp black, carbide, binder twine, hemp and sisal, canning machinery, baskets, barrels, food containers of all kinds, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, pit, iron billets, moulding sand, cotton wool, leather, household goods, cement, asphalt, coke products, plaster, and plaster board. To permit acceptance of less carload freight, in lots of 10,000 lbs. or more, for one station on the New Haven and C. N. E. R. R., or for one connecting line beyond. Placed account of accumulation. Upon carload and less carload freight, coming from connections at Bay- ridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, Maybrook, or Campbell Hall. EXCEP- TIONS: Perishable and livestock, Government freight, railroad supplies including fuel, foodstuffs for human consumption, freight in tank cars, fuel consigned to public utilities, including street and interurban railroads, electric car and lighting plants, gas plants, ice plants, water and sewer, hospitals, schools and other public utilities. Placed account of accumulation, upon all freight, coming from connections at Bayridge, Harlem River, or Oak Point, N. Y., Maybrook, Campbell Hall, N. Y., except that this embargo does not apply to, perishable, live- stock, Government freight, railroad supplies, foodstuffs for human and 30 Dates placed, Extended, CNJ Em- Modified, bargo No. or cancelled. Resume of Embargoes. animal consumption, anthracite and bituminous coal, coke, charcoal, freight in tank cars, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, printers ink, ink drums, carbon or lamp black, carbide, binder twine, hemp and sisal, canning machinery, food containers of all kinds, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, pig iron, billets, moulding sand, household goods, cement, asphalt, clay and clay products, plaster ‘boards, leather, less carload freight, for Bridgeport, Waterbury, New Britain, New Haven, Hartford, Springfield, Providence, Worcester, Boston, Fall River or New Bedford, when loaded direct to destination and for other points when loaded direct to a designated transfer or destination according to minimum. Cancelled Sept. 15, 1920. 521 Oct. 7, 1920. Placed account of accumulation upon all less carload freight from P. R. R., C.R. R. of N. J., L. V., L. 1, N. Y. C. via Bayridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, Fresh Pond Junction, and Port Norris, Maybrook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except Government freight and railroad supplies. Cancelled Oct. 11, 1920. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY, (ALLEGHENY RE- GION) DURING THE YEAR 1920, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. 9879 Jan. 17, 1920. Placed account accumulation, upon all freight from all points destined to all points on or routing via Central New England Railroad, through May- brook Gateway except livestock, perishable freight, food and feed for hu- man and animal consumption and railroad fuel. Cancelled Feb. 3, 1920. 9889 Jan, 22, 1920. Placed account of Eastern Region embargoes, due to weather conditions affecting harbor operations in New York and resulting accumulation. Upon all eastbound carload from all points to all points on or routing via New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R. via Harlem River. EXCEP- TIONS: Livestock, perishable freight, newsprint paper, wood pulp, pulp wood, railroad supplies, bituminous coal, coke, petroleum products. Modified To permit acceptance of foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, Jan. 29, 1920. originating at points east of Pittsburgh and Erie, Pa., and Buffalo, N. Y. Cancelled Feb. 16, 1920. #6 (Sup #8). Apr. 1, 1920. Placed account of labor trouble in New York Harbor. ; Upon all traffic routing via Jersey City, N. J., destined to points on or via New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Cancelled May 11, 1920. #6 (Sup. +20). P 3 ; ; Apr. 11, 1920. Placed account of restrictions, in effect with connecting lines, due to labor trouble. Placed upon all carload and less carload freight, routing via Lehigh & Hudson R. R. at Easton, Pa., or Lehigh & New England Railroad at Beth- lehem, Pa., destined to points on or via Central New England R. R. at Maybrook, or Campbell Hall, N. Y. Cancelled Apr. 27, 1920. 31 SUMMARY 1916 Cars were held on C. R. R. of N. J. at the following stations: January—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. February—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. March—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. April—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. May—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. June—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. July—Jersey City, Easton, Allentown Yard. August—Jersey City. September—Jersey City. October—Jersey City. November—Jersey City. December—Jersey City. Total for Year______----_-_-_ 45,078 Cars were held on following connections: January—-P&R, B&O, WM, C&O. February—P&R, B&O, WM. March—P&R, B&O, WM. April—P&R, B&O, WM. May—B&O. June—P&R, B&O. July—P&R, B&O. August—B&0. September— October— November— December— Total for year______-_________ 51,824 32 CARS HELD FORN. Y.N. H. & H.R. R. Year 1916. Date Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 69 230 155 180 310 158 2 362 503 168 144 223 174 3 403 338 236 193 153 4 442 319 17 98 147 37 31 5 =. 853 226 122 219 168 6 314 249 104 151 167 7 $898 159 76 141 238 1 37 8 313 294 102 156 27 =—-.231 18 9 220 249 15 128 83 238 74 10 =. 248 326 102 48 120 50 = =239 3 11 =305 190 96 231 54 239 2 19 12 = 335 241 246 75 89 85 238 83 18 = 448 99 610 23 124 146 43 25 46 14 446 225 792 146 143 135 63 75 15 3572 190 817 95 130 4 149 4 16 = 380 470 877 191 119 65 66 9 42 17 = 3.48 441 781 245 189 127 21 18 94 530 667 427 167 76 210 61 19 =308 457 869 296 64 68 63 231 14 20 230 384 407 330 157 168 179 61 44 11 21 = 251 303 302 417 102 103-207 44 18 12 137 22 =146 253 311 393 140 79 372 174 36 6 137 23 0=—«114 402 319 257 73 107 = 485 197 37 131 24 = 120 322 225 303 135 188 248 197 77 37 150 25 51 359 1738 96 118 9.354 255 26 93 453 33 144 6 29 = =228 248 8 27 = 105 332 20 138 87 209 88 246 2 28 386156 330 5 76 232 8109 171 39 68 29 89 220 193 277 57 153 9 30 64 120 345 126 12 31 74 20 251 31 Tot’l 7831 9094 8267 4013 3486 2221 5431 2727 805 387 86 730 Total 45078 On connections. 138329 7971 4185 1088 2256 8682 14074 294 Total 51824 33 SUMMARY 1917. Cars were held on C. R. R. of N. J. at the following stations: January—Jersey City, Ashley, Penobscot, Mauch Chunk, Northampton, Allentown Yard, Bethle- hem Jct., E. & W. Jct. February—Jersey City, Ashley, Penobscot, Mauch Chunk, Northampton, Allentown Yard, Bethle- hem Jct., E. & W. Jct. March—Jersey City, Ashley, Penobscot, Mauch Chunk, Northampton, Allentown Yard, Bethlehem Jct., E. & W. Jct. April—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. May—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, EB. & W. Jct. June—Jersey City, Penobscot, Mauch Chunk, Northampton, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. July—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. August—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. September—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. October—Jersey City, Penobscot, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. November—Jersey City. December—Jersey City. Total for year___________-__ 23,770. Cars were held on following connections: Jan. P.&R.,B.&0O., W. M. Feb. P.&R., B. & O., W. M. Mar. P.& R., B.& O., W. M. Apr. P.&R., B. & O., W. M. May B. & O. June P.& R., B. & O., W. M., N. & W. July P& RK, B.& O., W.M., N. & W. Aug. P.& R., B. & O., W. M., N. & W. Sept. P.& R, B.& O., W. M,N. & W. Oct. P.& R., B. & O. Nov. Dec. ok CARS HELD FOR N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Year 1917. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 51 244 115 282 189 49 84 135 14 2 189 148 121 235 224 7 88 43 3 50 110 135 171 —s:183 7 23 4 39 104 126 128 =6162 53 4 14 5 48 20 99 100 50 = 116 67 6 148 94 83 45 83 86 84 7 56 101 166 99 38 80 10 7 - 78 17 8 84 215 122 17 66 21 138 88 7 9 196 103 75 9 27 30 213 87 15 10 67 189 57 12 72 8 231 179 38 11 82 148 14 157 18 126 191 20 12 2 78 76 92 29 28 91 95 47 13 89 164 60 44 85 52 81 195 109 144 «112 218 83 25 42 29 43 245 65 15 9-185 361 79 6 67 23 120 283 16 39 389 201 51 38 17 445 34 17-288 270 216 124 23 268 53 18 39-234 251 146 2 152 211 5 110 19 = 885 233 131 102 93 157 233 20 424 121 146 62 172 64 138 21 139 239 125 83 163 156 22 170 232 101 26 235 146 23 188 3 170 283 30 719 24 =112 63 76 152 25 197 35 81 25 52 40 63 26 24 53 103 27 73 12 38 91 89 126 22 28 155 66 124 50 29 283 20 126 §=6118 28 44 380 = 242 96 78 37 53 31176 169 79 5 36 Tot’l8200 4094 2871 1210 246 1446 3138 482 1623 4192 221 1547 Total 23770 On Connections. 1145 11709 8003 9852 125 6672 10426 1292 10633 88138 Total 68670 35 SUMMARY 1918 Cars held on C. R. R. of N. J. at the following stations: January—Jersey City, Allentown Yard, E. & W. Jct. February—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. March—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. April—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. May—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. June—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. July— August— September— October— November— December— Cars were held on following connections: January—P. & R., B.& O0., W. M., N. & W., C. & O., C. & O. of I. February—P. & R. March—No cars held. April—No cars held. May—No cars held. June—No cars held. July— August— September— October— November— December— 36 CARS HELD FOR N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Year 1918. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 58 8 145 26 2 61 260 78 3 25 275 31 4 75 AQ 33 19 5 29 18 54 6 24 125 18 7 5 38 65 34 8 23 31 63 9 33 oe 82 Federal Period am a = 40 No per diem received from or paid 11 78 19 39 N. Y. N. H. & H. R. R. and no re- 12 39 19 claims made after July. 13 27 16 14 78 60 15 105 48 53 16 61 11 2 33 93 17 93 18 90 17 19 101 2 48 20 124 35 21 =126 117 7 17 18 22 1384 2 23 ~=140 74 17 50 3 24 158 38 17 120 ' 25 96 35 148 7 26 144 52 80 27 91 57 60 53 28 97 136 34 50 5 29 107 27 21 30 81 24 31 93 26 Tot’l 2430 663 1415 392 619 299 Total 5818 On Connections 7477 338 Total 7815 37 SUMMARY 1919 Cars held on C. R. R. of N. J. at the following stations: January— February— March— April— May— June— July— August— September— October—Jersey City. November—Jersey City. December—Jersey City. No cars held on connections for year 1919. 38 CARS HELD FOR N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Year 1919. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 72 2 3 4 34 5 126 6 13 6 7 28 26 8 9 42 10 Federal Period 155 11 No per diem received from or Pe cisitia wade poy Octobe, ® Wt 13 176 14 98 15 62 16 17 18 89 19 117 20 66 21 61 22 23 73 23 63 46 24 37 25 155 26 AT 86 27 73 168 28 8 13 29 56 30 16 31 77 13 Totals 139 896 1672 On Connections—No cars. 39 SUMMARY 1920 Cars were held on the C. R. R. of N. J. at the following stations: January—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. February—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct. March—Jersey City, Bloomsbury, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown Yard, Penobscot. April—Jersey City, Bayonne, Brills, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown Yard, Catasauqua, Northampton, Siegfried, Palmerton, Mauch Chunk, Coalport, Haucks, Silver Brook, White Haven, Penobscot. May—Jersey City, Bayonne, Elizabethport, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown Yard, Cata- sauqua, Palmerton, Mauch Chunk, Coalport, Haucks, Penobscot, Wilkes Barre. June—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown Yard, Catasauqua, Northampton, Coal- port, Penobscot. July—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown Yard, Catasauqua, Northampton, Mauch Chunk, Penobscot. August—Jersey City, E. & W. Jct., Bethlehem Jct., Allentown, Penobscot. September—Jersey City. October—Jersey City. November—Jersey City. December—Jersey City. Total for year___.____________ 52,058. Cars were held on the following connections: January—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M. February—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. March—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. April—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. May—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. June—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. July—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M., N. & W. August—P. & R., B. & O., C. Val., W. M. September— October— November— December— Total for year___________ 58,688. 40 CARS HELD FOR N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Year 1920. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 39 138 126 609 158 2 273 103 37 37 2 22 85 131 177 732 146 48 382 105 19 3 40 233 159 328 644 167 12 444 127 8 4 35 393 55 451 578 10 12 271 170 5 46 247 18 95 512 114 27 204 93 6 140 338 56 183 430 143 12 241 3 22 7 83 347 205 105 289 150 14 80 17 8 9 286 312 54 109 391 49 139 9 39 155 385 179 175 411 24 61 Al 10 =.202 87 258 293 440 691 20 96 46 29 89 11 77 190 348 363 672 71 118 61 52 12 5 70 230 409 301 673 200 62 35 104 13 57 114 448 273 731 165 38 14 80 32 294 372 212 549 299 36 2 27 6 15 246 141 830 533 259 3893 = 167 41 59 99 16 =:150 79 301 548 130 393 42 89 31 70 17 = 415 33 248 549 105 367 =—.309 45 82 49 18 §=112 22 300 498 261 56 192 47 68 39 19 «151 39 331 454 207 3833 230 27 116 20 147 20 201 444 27 228 226 31 48 48 21 146 66 218 494 142 63 163 79 61 130 22 214 67 230 561 131 200 361 45 66 52 23181 1 232 518 95 146 9255 40 18 20 24 8241 74 277 587 120 57 =1938 68 120 25 «211 85 247 542 112 53-290 29 97 26 =: 158 44 228 550 68 101 +159 73 27 227 217 564 13 88 342 39 28 86199 206 581 60 23-233 37 37 52 29 «147 25 201 654 118 538-282 62 73 66 30 =: 180 212 567 183 19 227 24 81 31 72 178 242 70 6 2 Tot’l4016 3107 6512 12086 7876 7579 4818 3291 1121 638 291 773 Total 52058 On Connections. 2929 3226 1118 12841 15968 9018 12955 638 Total 58688 41 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of January, 1920 ~ Bs 5 5 le @ | a Total 16945 42 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of February, 1920 » os 5 a | = 2 | B yp 5S |e Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of March, 1920 yoosqoueg prex umozUel[y ‘pL weyeTyIeg ‘pr mM FA AInqsuloo[g AID Asser Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of April, 1920 ‘UPd yoosqousg UsACH oY M yoolg JeAjis syoney] yunyy) yoneyy uoVIWI[ eg PaLTJsoIg u0j}duIey}.10N enbneseye,) prez uMoWWIT]Yy “Jor Weye|YIog ‘PLM BH SIME auuoskeg AYIDQ Aesier CY |CYD |CYD 1OMD [CVD |CYD [CVD |evD eH oY |e) oO |O oO 45 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of May, 1920 ‘0 Fd “UPd yoosqousg syoney q1od[eoy uoPIOW eq enbneseyeg prez uMo WITTY ‘PP Weye[qjog ‘PLM F a 410d J auuoseg AyIQ Aosiep Rule No. 15 Cars held for N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of June, 1920 al ® > | o 5 |e 3 8 SB\/-/E/ElF Fle | 3 pie le |e! ebal es) 2a ela) ele Cre ee Date) $la|/alal/d /2/S]e]ala | cle | z | Total 1 [| 43, | 62] 32 | 2 | 48 69 1| 28 | 146 3 9| 48 83 27 | 167 4 10 | | 10 5 114 114 6 67 76 | | 143 7 7| 51) 92 150 8 82| 91] 92] 156 20 391 9 5] 55] 116] 225 10 | 411 24| 124| 126| 301] 116 691 43| 165] 103] 193] 168 312| 21 22 1| 1028 70) 122] 101] 214] 166 420 4 48] 17] 1162 188| 114] 101] 184| 166 28| 447| 44] 129] 35) 40] 1426 83| 80] 101] 140] 166 29| 509| 58] 154] 47] 50] 1362 33| 100| 65] 166 29| 386| 64] 197| 65| 66] 1171 385 100] 166] 55 387| 412) 70] 225) 71| 79] 1250 26| 44 97| 163] 387| 444| 78] 258] 72) 89] 1298 19 387 56 40| 27 176| 58 37 | | | 3383 58| 41 91 38] 466] 86] 194| 86] 15] 1075 | 41 22| | | 219] 86] 269] 92] 15] 744 70| | 180] | | 34] 86] 279| 104) 88] 741 56 | 90] | | 29] 87] 286] 95] 18] 661 [| 4¢ | | | 35] 92) 218] 120; 18) 540 19} 12; | 8 | '| 4 92; 6] 58) 18] 227 15) 12) «| «(4 | | | 49) 92 [iii] 18) 371 12| | 76| | | | | 92| | 20] 18] 218 lil; 2 T!)UCUT!tCé«~*d r |. 9i| | 46; 18) 178 iy eh [| 1 9 | 40) 18) 202 6 is) dO 88168 aia ay ae | | | ee 47 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of July, 1920 O B'N ‘WM ‘TRA “OD ‘O Ba ‘a Pid qoosqoueg yanyO youeyAl uo durey}.10N enbneseye) piex uMOoWOTTY gel Meteo] qed. ‘Pre M BA AyIg Aasiar a » 3s A 48 Rule No. 15 Cars held for N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of August, 1920 ‘WM TEA ‘O ‘OR a ‘a Pd joosqousd pre X uMoWETLy ‘or WYETH ‘PLM Fa AyD Aosior 49 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of September, 1920 es S Date| & | Total 1 | 103] 1038 2 | 105) 105 3 | 127| 127 4 |170| 170 5 93, 93 qT 7 Tt 10 46| 46 11 | 61] 61 12 35| = 35 14 2 2 21 61,61 22 66| 66 23 | 18] 18 24 | 120| 120 25 97| 97 1121] 1121 50 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of October, 1920 51 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the N.Y.N.H. & H.R.R. Month of November, 1920 Jersey City Date Total _ Sd] OV] CO} DO 22 bo bo +t ret] et et] ee | G9] DO] 4] DS] CO} CO] A 68| 68 116| 116 48| 48 BO} BY] DO] BO] BO) kf et} el 63] BS} A] S} <0] 00] i | 6 7 8 9 10 89 89 11 | 52) 52 12 | 104] 104 13 14 6 6 15 | 99| 99 16 | 70} 70 17 | 49| 49 18 | 389] 39 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 52 52 29 | 66 66 30 | 81] 81 31 | 2i 2 | Total 773 53 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. L41 THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY Albany, N. Y., Dec. 19th, 1920. File 620.5 From: Superintendent of Transportation. To: General Manager (Thru Channels). Subject: Embargoes. 1. Your letter Dec. 17th relative embargoes placed by Boston & Maine Rail- road, Delaware and Hudson Co., and other lines restricting traffic to points in New England during the years 1916-1917-1918-1919 and 1920. 2. Am attaching as requested: (1) Statements showing resume of the embargoes which restricted such traf- fic, together with analysis showing total number of days restrictions were in effect each year, also for the five-year period. (2) Statements showing by years and months the number of cars held by D. & H. Co., and its connections for delivery to the Boston & Maine. Full detail by days and months are shown for 1920, but for the previous years such detail is not now available. (Signed) J. E. ROBERTS. O. A. to G. M~-T—December 20, 1920—to General Manager. 1. Forwarded. SUMMARY SHOWING ToTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND—ROUTED ViA DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY AND Boston & MAINE R. R. YEARS 1916 TO 1920, INCLUSIVE. Account Account D. & H. Co. B. & M.R.R. Years Embargoes Embargoes 1916 322 Days 145 Days 1917 472 “ Zor 1918 53 OOS 104.“ 1919 10 “ Oo * 1920 129 = 299 “ 986 “ 785 “ ROGAN ash Bee ret Seon 1771 Days Less account overlapping Embargoes 882 “ Grand Total Days restricted during the Five Year Period__________ 939 “ On an average of________ 187 4/5 Days per year SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY AND BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD DURING YEAR 1916. TRAFFIC RESTRICTED Account B. & M. embargoes_________ 145 Days Account D. & H. embargoes_________ 322 “ 467“ Less account overlapping embargoes__ 185 “ Total days restricted__.___________ 282 “ STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY BosToN & MAINE R. R. DURING THE YEAR 1916 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. 751 Jan. 20. Placed account accumulation and heavy movement of traffic into New England. Embargoed all eastbound traffic for points on or via the Boston & Maine at Mechanicville or Troy. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, newsprint paper, coal, coke, charcoal, petroleum in tank cars, L. C. L. mdse., and all material consigned to railroads including fuel coal. Modified to permit acceptance of all traffic EXCEPT for points on the Boston & Jan. 21. Albany or N. Y. N. H. & H. Cancelled March 10. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo 842 March 18. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed traffic via any junction point destined to points on or via the N. Y. N. H. & H. or C. N. E. Superseded March 17. 857 March 17. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic via any junction point destined to points on or via the N. Y. NN. H. & H. or C. N. E. Cancelled April 138. 862 March 22. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic via any junction point destined to points on or via the N. Y. N. H. & H. or C. N. E. Cancelled March 29. 986 May 3. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all eastbound traffic from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanieville or Troy or from the New York Central at Rotterdam or Troy. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, printing paper, shipments for U. 8. Govt. and materials for railroads. Modified May 4. to permit acceptance of agricultural implements and fertilizer. Cancelled May 18. 1160 Aug. 1. Piaced account congestion. Embargoed all carload traffic from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanicville or Troy, EXCEPT: livestock, shipments for U. 8. Govt. or Boston & Maine. Modified Aug. 3. to permit acceptance of newsprint paper. Modified to permit acceptance of all traffic originating on D. & H. Co. north of Aug. 5. Mechanicville. Cancelled Aug. 10. 1343 Oct. 12. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all shipments from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Me- chanicville or Troy. EXCEPTIONS: traffic originating at or coming via stations on D. & H. Co., north of Mechanicville; also except livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, shipments for Boston ’& Maine or U. 8. Govt. Modified Oct. 14. to permit acceptance of less carload shipments. Cancelled Oct. 25. te Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. 1466 Nov. 13. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all shipments from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Me- chanicville or Troy. EXCEPTIONS: traffic originating at or coming via stations on D. & H. Co., north of Mechanicville; also except livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, shipments for Boston & Maine or U. S. Govt. Modified Nov. 16. to permit acceptance of anthracite coal. Modified Nov. 27. to permit the acceptance of bituminous coal. Cancelled Dec. 2. 1596 Dec. 4. Placed account box car shortage and required equalization. Embargoed all box car freight, carload and less carload, when originating West of the Hudson River and destined to points on Boston & Maine. Cancelled Dec. 11. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY DELAWARE AND HUDSON Co. DURING THE YEAR 1916 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. 716 Dec. 31, 1915. Placed account accumulation and inability of Boston & Maine to accept. Embargoed all carload traffic, except livestock, perishable, and B. & M. fuel coal, from connecting lines for delivery to the Boston & Maine. Extended Jan. 11. to cover all eastbound traffic, carload and less carload, from connecting lines and from local D. & H. Co. stations for delivery to Boston & Maine. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, newsprint paper, coal, coke, charcoal, petroleum products in tank cars, less carload shipments mdse., and all materials for B. & M. supply. Modified Jan. 20. to permit acceptance of such traffic from local D. & H. Co. stations. Cancelled March 10. 782 Feb. 9. Placed account accumulation. ; Embargoed all carload traffic from connecting lines South of Schenectady and Albany for points on or via all connecting lines at Mechanicville, Schenectady, Troy and Albany. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, and shipments for railroads or U. S. Govt. Modified Feb. 26. to permit the acceptance of coal. Extended March 17. to cover all coal except railroad supply fuel. Modified March 27. to permit acceptance of seeds, fertilizer, fertilizer materials and agricul- tural implements. 3 D&H em- bargo No. ™ 950 1033 1149 1226 13836 Dates placed, Extended Modified, or Cancelled Modified March 29. Modified April 4. Cancelled April 15. April 26. Modified May 12. Cancelled May 13. May 23. Cancelled Aug. 18. July 31. Resume of Embargo. to permit acceptance of newsprint paper. to permit acceptance of nursery stock. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all freight, carload and less carload, from connecting lines at junction points south of Schenectady and Albany for points on or via all connecting lines at Schenectady, Mechanicville, Troy or Albany. EXCEP- TIONS: livestock, perishable, seeds, fertilizer, agricultural implements, newsprint paper, shipments for railroads or U. S. Govt. to permit acceptance of such traffic for delivery to the Boston & Albany. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all LESS CARLOAD traffic from connecting lines at junction points South or West of Sidney for points on or via all connecting lines at Schenectady, Mechanicville, Troy and Albany. EXCEPTIONS: cars con- ae 10,000 lbs. or more, billed direct to a connecting line beyond D. & H. Co. Placed account accumulation and inability of the Boston & Maine to accept. Embargoed all carload and less carload traffic from connecting lines for points on or via the Boston & Maine. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perishable, ‘material and supplies for the Boston & Maine and shipments for the U. S. Cancelled Aug. 10. Aug 30. Cancelled Sept. 3. Oct. 11. Cancelled Oct. 25. Govt. Placed account labor troubles. Embargoed all freight from all points for all points. Placed account accumulation and inability of the Boston & Maine to accept. Embargoed all freight, carload and less carload, from connecting lines for points on or via the Boston & Maine. EXCEPTIONS: livestock, perish- able, materials and supplies for the B. & M., and shipments for the U. S. Govt. D&H em- bargo No. 1446 1538 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Nov. 8. Modified Dec. 11. Modified Dec. 14. Suspended Dec. 23. Nov. 22. Extended Nov. 25. Modified Nov. 29. Cancelled Dec. 1. Resume of Embargo. Placed account accumulation and inability of connections to accept. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload, from connecting lines at junction points south of Schenectady and Albany for points on or via all connecting lines at Schenectady, Mechanicville, Troy and Albany. EXCEP- TIONS: livestock, perishable, anthracite and bituminous coal, coke, fuel oil, shipments for railroads and U. S. Govt. to permit acceptance of all freight loaded in B. & M., B. & Ar., or Me. Cent. equipment for points on or via the Boston & Maine. to permit ‘the acceptance of charcoal and fertilizer. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all ANTHRACITE COAL for points on or via Boston & Maine. to cover bituminous coal, except railroad fuel supply. to permit acceptance of anthracite coal. SUMMARY SHOWING ToTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY AND BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD DURING YEAR 1917 TRAFFIC RESTRICTED Account B. & M. Embargoes________ 237 Days Account D. & H. Embargoes_______-_ 472 “ 709 =“ Less account overlapping embargoes__ 395 “ Total Days restricted____________-_ 314 “ STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY BosTOoN & MAINE R. R. DURING THE YEAR 1917 1921 Feb. 3, 1917. Modified Feb. 9. Cancelled Feb. 17, 1917. - RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all shipments routing to or via B. & M. at Rotterdam, Me- chanicville or Troy, EXCEPT (Livestock, perishable, coal, coke, fuel oil, field and garden seeds, fertilizer, newsprint paper, agricultural implements, nursery stock, materials for Railoads and U. S. Govt.) To permit acceptance of feed for livestock. D&H em- bargo No. 2130 2216 2228 2258 2461 2613 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Mar. 31, 1917. Cancelled April 5. April 20. Cancelled April 20, 1917. April 26. Modified April 28. Modified May 1, 1917. Modified May 17. Superseded July 11, 1917. May 4. Cancelled May 15, 1917. July 11. Cancelled August 16. Sept. 5, 1917. Cancelled Oct. 15, 1917. Resume of Embargoes. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, materials for railroads, U. 8. Govt. and W. U. Telegraph Co., also except traffic originat- ing at Troy or Albany) routing to or via B. & M. at Rotterdam, Mechanic. ville or Troy. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, materials for railroads, U. 8. Govt. and W. U. Telegraph Co., also except traffic originat- ing at Troy or Albany) routing to or via B. & M. at Rotterdam, Mechanic. ville or Troy. Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight originating on or routing via N. Y. C., DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO., B. & A. or N. Y., N. H. & H. for handling at B. & M. transfers or stations short of final destination. To permit acceptance perishable freight, dairy products, field and garden seeds. To permit acceptance of U.S. Govt. freight. To permit acceptance of all shipments for points on B. & M. but not for beyond. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all carload traffic eastbound from D. & H. Co. at Mechanicville or Troy (except traffic originating at Troy or Albany, also except livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, field and garden seeds, seed grain, nursery as coe material for railroads, W. U. Tel. Co. and U. 8S. Govt. reight). Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight originating on or coming via N. Y. C., DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO., B. & A. or N. Y., N. H. & H. when requiring handling at B. & M. transfers. Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight eastbound from N. Y. C. or D. & H. Co. requiring handling at B. & M. transfers. D&H em- bargo No. 2614 2677 2723 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Sept. 6, 1917. Account accumulation. EKmbargoed all eastbound carload freight (except shipments originating at Troy or Albany, also except livestock, perishable, coal, coke, ore, shipments for railroads and U. S. Govt.) from N. Y. C. at Rotterdam or Troy, and from D. & H. Co. at Mechanicville or Troy. ; Extended Sept. 10, rege cover all carload freight except shipments originating at Troy or bany. Cancelled Sept. 18, 1917. Oct. 31. Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload from N. Y. C. or D. & H. Co. requiring handli at B. & M. transfers Mechanicville. URS SOTO Extended Nov. 16. To cover such traffic for handling at other B. & M. transfers. Cancelled Nov. 19, 1917. Dec. 7, 1917. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all carload traffic from N. Y. C. at Rotterdam and Troy and from D. & H. Co. at Mechanicville and Troy (except freight originating at Troy or Albany, also except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human con- sumption, feed for livestock, coal, newsprint paper, shipments for railroads U. S. Govt. and W. U. Telegraph Co. , Extended Dec. 17. To cover coal except when billed to railroads or U. S. Govt. Cancelled Jan. 4, 1918. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY DELAWARE AND HUDSON Co. DURING THE YEAR 1917 1446 1868 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Nov. 8, 1916. Embargoed all carload and less carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, Suspended anthracite and bituminous coal, coke, fuel oil, charcoal, fertilizer, iron and Dec. 23, 1916. steel articles, shipments of any nature billed to railroads or U. S. Govt., Reinstated freight for points on or via B. & M. when lcaded in B. & M. or B. & Ar. or Jan. 14, 1917. Me. Ct. equipment). : Modified Jan. 18, 1917.To permit acceptance of field and garden seeds. Extended March 5, 1917.To cover charcoal, iron and steel articles also other than commodities origi- nally mentioned loaded in B. & M., B. & Ar. or Me. Ct. equipment. Cancelled Mar. 21, 1917. Jan. 22, 1917.Placed account embargoes of other lines on like traffic. Embargoed all traffic, carloads and less carloads (except coal, field and garden seeds, newsprint paper) via any route for points on or via N. Y., N. H. & H. Cancelled Feb. 28, 1917. D&H em- bargo No. 2109 2162 2323 2332 2355 2525 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Mar. 24, 1917.Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload (except livestock, perish- able, anthracite and bituminous coal, shipments billed to railroads and U.S. Govt.) from connecting lines at junction points south of Schenectady and Albany for points on or via all connecting lines at Schenectady, Me- chanicville, Troy and Albany. Superseded June 9, 1917. April 10, 1917.Account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic carload and less carload (except livestock, perishable, shipments billed to railroads and U. S. Govt.) for points on or via B. & M. Modified April 18. To permit acceptance less carload freight. Cancelled May 26, 1917. May 26, 1917.Placed account restrictions placed by B. & M. and to avoid congestion. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload (except shipments originat- ing at Albany or Troy, also except livestock, perishable foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, newsprint paper, charcoal, ship- ments for railroads and U. 8. Govt.) Cancelled June 7, 1917. June 1, 1917. Placed account restrictions placed by B. & M. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, shipments billed to railroads or U. S. Govt.) for points on or via B. & M. routing to that company at Mechanicville or Troy. Cancelled June 9, 1917. June 9, 1917. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic carload and less carload (except livestock, perishable freight, shipments billed to railroads or U.S. Govt., anthracite coal, ore, agricultural implements, field and garden seeds) from connections at junction points south and west of Schenectady and Albany destined to points on or via all connecting lines at Schenectady, Mechanicville, Troy and Albany. Modified June 15, 1917.To permit acceptance bituminous coal. Cancelled Sept. 22. Aug. 2, 1917. Placed account congestion. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, shipments freight for U. S. Govt.) also (except coal, coke and ore loaded to full marked weight or cubical capacity of car) from connections at Bingham- ton-Owego and Wilkes-Barre destined to points beyond D. & H. Co. Modified Aug. 17, 1917.To permit acceptance such traffic from connections at Binghamton and Owego. Cancelled Aug. 18, 1917. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY AND BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD DURING YEAR 1918. TRAFFIC RESTRICTED. Account B. & M. Embargoes________ 104 days Account D. & H. Embargoes_______- Bon 2: 157 “ Less account overlapping embargoes.__ 40 “ Total days restricted__.__.__________ 117“ STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY BOSTON & MAINE R. R. DURING THE YEAR 1918 D&H em- bargo No. 2723 2750 2768 10-3 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Dec. 7, 1917. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all earload traffic from N. Y. C. at Rotterdam and Troy and from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanicville and Troy (except: freight originating at Troy or Albany, also except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, coal, newsprint paper, shipments for Railroads, U. S. Govt. and W. U. Telegraph Co.) Extended Dec. 17, 1917.To cover coal except when billed to Railroads or U. 8. Govt. Cancelled Jan. 4, 1918. Jan. 5, 1918. Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight (except shipments for U. S. Govt. or American Red Cross and cars carded direct to final destinations.) Cancelled Jan. 12, 1918. Jan. 16, 1918. To insure handling of coal and other essential commodities. Embargoed all carload traffic from N. Y. C. at Rotterdam and Troy and from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanicville and Troy (except ship- ments originating at Troy or Albany, also except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, coal, coke, charcoal, fertilizer, shipments for U. S. Govt. and its Allies and American Red Cross, shipments for Railroads and public utilities.) Superseded Jan. 23, 1918. Jan. 23. To insure handling of coal and other essential commodities. Embargoed all carload traffic from N. Y. C. at Rotterdam and Troy and from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanicville and Troy (except shipments originating at Troy or Albany), also except livestock,perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, coal, coke, charcoal, fertilizer, shipments for U. S. Govt. and its Allies and American Red Cross, shipments for railroads and public utilities. Cancelled Feb. 28. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. 10-17 Jan. 26. Account accumulation. 10-12 10-20 10-53 Embargoed all carload freight (except foodstuffs for human consumption, livestock, perishable, U. S. Govt. freight) for points on or via N. Y., N. H & H.R. R. Cancelled Jan. 30. April 2. Account heavy eastbound movement. Embargoed all carload traffic (except shipments originating at Troy or Albany), also except livestock, perishable, coal for railroads. Cancelled April 15, 1918. May 27. Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight (except livestock and perishable) from connections at Rotterdam or Mechanicville unless loaded in cars carded to final destination. Cancelled June 12, 1918. Aug. 2, 1918.Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight (except livestock and perishable) from connections at Rotterdam or Mechanicville unless loaded in cars carded to final destination. Modified Aug. 16. To permit acceptance such traffic at Rotterdam and Mechanicville. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY DURING YEAR 1918 41 72 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Feb. 11, 1918.Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, fuel, shipments for U. S. Govt. and RRs.) from P. R. R., C. R. R. of N. J., or Lehigh Valley at, Wilkes-Barre and Hudson destined to points beyond DELAWARE AND HUDSON CoO. Cancelled Mar. 26, 1918. March 25. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload (except livestock, perish- able, coal for Railroads, suppres for D. & H. Co.) from all connections Wilkes-Barre, Hudson, Binghamton and Owego destined to all points on or via the DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. Cancelled April 4, 1918. 10 SUMMARY SHOWING ToTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEW ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE DELAWARE AND HuDSON COMPANY AND BosToN & MAINE RAILROAD DURING YEAR 1919. TRAFFIC RESTRICTED. Account B. & M. Embargoes__________ 10 Days Account D. & H. Embargoes__________ Oo “ Total Days Restricted___________ 10 “ STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY BOSTON & MAINE R. R. DURING THE YEAR 1919 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. 10-15 August 9. ‘Account labor trouble. Embargoed all traffic carload and less carload from all connections for all points on or via Boston & Maine R. R. Cancelled Aug. 19. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY DURING THE YEAR 1919 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. NO RECORD OF ANY RESTRICTIONS. SUMMARY SHOWING ToTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS IN NEw ENGLAND ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY AND BosToN & MAINE RAILROAD DURING YEAR 1920. TRAFFIC RESTRICTED. Account B. & M. Embargoes_______- 299 Days Account D. & H. Embargoes_______- 129 “ 428 “ 6c Less account overlapping embargoes__ 212 Total Days restricted___________ 216 STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY BOSTON & MAINE R. R. DURING THE YEAR 1920 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. 10-6 Feb. 9. Account accumulation and severe weather conditions. Embargoed all carload and less carload freight (except bituminous coal, livestock, food and feed for human and animal consumption, news and bookprint paper, shipments for railroads) from all connections. Cancelled March 9. 11 D&H em- bargo No. 10-18 10-16 10-16 10-17 10-30 10-82 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled March 29. Cancelled April 12. April 2. Cancelled April 26. May 4. Cancelled Sept. 16. May 5. Cancelled June 1. June 21. Modified July 8. Cancelled July 16. July 26. Modified Aug. 14. Cancelled Sept. 9. Resume of Embargoes. Account accumulation. Embargoed all carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, anthracite coal and freight for railroads). Account accumulation. Embargoed all less carload freight from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Mechanicville for all points on or via B. & M. R. R. Account accumulation. Embargoed all carload or less carload freight from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. or NEW YORK CENTRAL R. R. destined to points on or via NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD. Account accumulation. Embargoed all eastbound carload and less carload from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. or NEW YORK CENTRAL at Mechanicville, Rotterdam or Troy. EXCEPT: livestock, perishable, coal, coke, fuel oil, news and book print paper, feed for human and animal consumption, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, freight for railroads. Account accumulation. Embargoed all eastbound carload and less carload from DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. or NEW YORK CENTRAL R. R. at Mechanicville, Rotter- dam, or Troy. EXCEPT: livestock, perishable, coal, coke, fuel oil, news and book print paper, feed for human and animal consumption, seed, nurs- ery stock, fertilizer, freight for railroads. To permit acceptance of carload traffic. Account accumulation. Embargoed eastbound carload and less carload traffic (except livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, railroad supplies, including fuel, shipments for U. 8S. Govt., coal for public utilities, fertilizer, feed for human and animal consumption). To permit acceptance less carload freight. 12 STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES PLACED BY DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY DURING THE YEAR D&H em- bargo No. 365 445 474 492 505 1920 RESTRICTING TRAFFIC INTO NEW ENGLAND. Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. March 9. Placed account weather conditions and resulting accumulations. " Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload. Except: Livestock, per- ishable, food and feed for human and animal consumption, coal and rail- road supplies, from all connecting lines at junction points south and west of Schenectady, Albany, Troy, Mechanicville. Cancelled April 3. May 4. Placed account accumulation. Embargoed all freight, carload and less carload (Except: Livestock, per- ishable, newsprint paper, food and feed for human and animal consump- tion, field and garden seeds, field and agricultural implements, railroad supplies, including fuel) from C. R. R., Lehigh Valley, at Wilkes-Barre, P. R. R. at Hudson, Erie and D. L. & W. at Binghamton, when destined points on or via Boston & Albany R. R. at Albany, N. Y., Boston & Maine at Mechanicville, Troy or Eagle Bridge. Modified May 24. To permit acceptance nursery stock. Modified June 2. To permit acceptance all traffic for points on or via Boston & Maine R. R. June 16. Account diversion of traffic via unnatural routes. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carloads (Except: Livestock, perish- able, newsprint paper, food and feed for human and animal consumption, nursery stock, fertilizer,: agricultural implements, railroad supplies, in- cluding fuel) from Central R. R. of New Jersey, Lehigh Valley or Pennsyl- vania RRs. at Wilkes-Barre Gateway or from Erie or Delaware, Lacka- wanna & Western RRs. at Binghamton Gateway destined to points on or via Boston & Maine at Mechanicville, Troy or Eagle Bridge. Cancelled July 8. July 19. Account diversion of traffic via unnatural routes. Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carloads (Except: Livestock, perish- able, newsprint paper, food and feed for human and animal consumption, nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural implements, railroad supplies, includ- ing fuel) fom Central R. R. of New Jersey, Lehigh Valley, or Pennsyl- vania RRs. at Wilkes-Barre Gateway or from Erie or Delaware, Lacka- wanna & Western RRs. at Binghamton Gateway destined to points on or via Boston & Maine at Mechanicville, Troy or Eagle Bridge. Cancelled Aug. 31. Aug. 27. Account inability of B. & M. R. R. to accept. 5 Embargoed all traffic, carload and less carload (Except: Livestock and perishable) originating at DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. stations destined to points on or via B. & M. routing to that Company via Me- chanicville, Troy or Eagle Bridge. Cancelled Aug. 81. 13 Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. 519 Oct. 2. To avoid accumulation. ‘KEmbargoed all traffic, carload and less carioad (except: livestock, perigsh- able, foodstuffs for human consumption, anthracite coal, railroad supplies, including fuel) from all points for all points on or via B. & M. at Mechanic. ville, Troy or Eagle Bridge. Cancelled Oct. 8. SUMMARY SHOWING TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS RESTRICTIONS WERE IN EFFECT AGAINST TRAFFIC FOR POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY ACCOUNT EMBARGOES PLACED BY OTHER LINES. YEARS 1316 To 1920, INCLUSIVE. Via Via Wilkes-Barre Binghamton Years. Gateway. Gateway. 1916__.--_-_---_-________- 0 0 BL OIE acer ah ht Ae nr bier eee S 92 25* TOSS e 2 ei ee ott 74* 51 1919__ .---__- 0 0 W920 2 ole ee eel, 96 74 262 150 During the Five-Year Period, traffic was re- stricted 412 days; Or an average of 822/5 days per year. * Approximately. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES OF OTHER LINES PLACED DURING YEAR 1916, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC TO POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY. NO RECORD OF ANY RESTRICTIONS. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES OF OTHER LINES PLACED DURING YEAR 1917, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC TO POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. _ or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. P.R.R. Feb. 5, 1917. Account accumulation. 1055 Embargoed against all freight destined to points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY routed via Wilkes-Barre, Hudson, Button- wood, or Honeypot. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, railroad fuel coal, freight for U.S. Govt., field and garden seeds, nursery stock, and fertilizer. Cancelled Feb. 26, 1917. P.R.R. Feb. 14, 1917.Account accumulation. 1080 Embargoed all carload freight routing via Elmira, Erie, Binghamton and Delaware and Hudson destined all points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human con- sumption, field and garden seeds, grain, nursery stock, fertilizer, U. S. Govt. freight. Cancelled Feb. 28, 1917. 14 D&H em- bargo No. P.R.R. 1343 P.R.R. 1820 P.R.R. 1894 P.R.R. 2057 Dates placed, Extended, Modified, or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. May 4, 1917. Account accumulation. Embargoed all freight routing to DELAWARE AND HUDSON at Hudson, Wilkes-Barre and Buttonwood, when destined to all points on or via DELA- WARE AND HUDSON. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, U. S. Govt. freight, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, tin plate, tin cans, railroad material, field and garden seeds, nursery stock, fertilizer, spraying materials, agricultural implements, drugs and medicines con- signed to Red Cross Hospitals. Cancelled May 26, 1917. Aug. 9, 1917. Account accumulation. Embargoed all carload shipments routing via DELAWARE AND HUD- ‘SON CO. at the Wilkes-Barre Gateways. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, printing paper, rail- road supplies, U. S. Govt. freight, drugs and medicines for Red Cross Hos- ‘pitals, nitro cellulose, barrels and fruit containers, tin plates and tin cans. Cancelled Aug. 18, 1917. Aug. 28, 1917. Account accumulation and inability of DELAWARE AND HUDSON to accept. Embargoed all carload freight to or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON through their Wilkes-Barre Gateway. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, railroad supplies, U. 8S. Govt. and Red Cross shipments. Cancelled Sept. 5, 1917. Sept. 26, 1917. Account accumulation and inability of DELAWARE AND HUDSON to accept. Embargoed all carload freight to or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON Cancelled through their Wilkes-Barre Gateway. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, Oct. 22, 1917. foodstuffs for human consumption, railroad supplies, U. S. Govt. and Red Cross shipments. CRRofNJ Oct. 14, 1917. Account accumulation due to DELAWARE AND HUDSON’s inability to 8036 Erie 156 D.L.&W. 3328 accept. Embargo against all carload and less westbound routing via DELAWARE AND HUDSON at Wilkes-Barre. EXCEPT: Domestic shipments, field and garden seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, perishable, foodstuffs for human consumption, feed for livestock, except hay, printing paper, railroad. fuel ‘and supplies, Western Union Telegraph Co. and U. S. Govt. freight. Cancelled Oct. 20, 1917. Aug. 3, 1917.Account accumulation. Embargoed all freight for points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON ‘CO. via Binghamton. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, and U. 8. Govt. freight. Cancelled Aug. 14, 1917. Feb. 14, 1917.Account inability of connections to accept. ; Embargoed all shipments coal and coke from Pennsylvania Railroad at Elmira, N. Y., consigned, reconsigned, or intended for points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. via Binghamton. No Record of Cancel- lation. — tat STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES OF OTHER LINES PLACED DURING YEAR 1918, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC TO POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY. Dates placed, Extended, D&H em- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. P.R.R. Jan. 17, 1918.Account accumulation. 71 Embargoed all freight destined to points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON through Wilkes-Barre Gateway. EXCEPT: Perishable freight, foodstuffs for human consumption, and coal. Extended Jan. 23, 1918.To cover all freight. EXCEPT: Food for human and animal consumption. Modified Feb. 6, 1918. To accept coal for railroads. Cancelled Feb. 9, 1918. * P.R.R. Feb. 18, 1918.Embargoed all carload freight destined to or routing via DELAWARE 148 AND HUDSON CO. at Wilkes-Barre. EXCEPT: Livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption and railroad supply coal. Extended To cover shipments to or via Erie or D. L. & W. RRs. at Elmira, via Bing- Feb. 27, 1918.hamton Gateway. Cancelled April 5, 1918. CRRofNJ Jan. 19, 1918. Account inability to accept. 8385 Embargoed all traffic to DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. via Wilkes- Barre. EXCEPT: Coal, fuel and Govt. freight. No Record of Cancel- lation. Erie Mar. 26, 1918.Account accumulation. 785 Embargoed all freight to points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Binghamton. EXCEPT: Livestock. Cancelled April 8, 1918. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES OF OTHER LINES PLACED DURING YEAR 1919, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC TO POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY. NO RECORD OF ANY RESTRICTIONS. STATEMENT SHOWING EMBARGOES OF OTHER LINES PLACED DURING THE YEAR 1920, RESTRICTING TRAFFIC TO POINTS ON OR VIA THE DELAWARE AND HUDSON COMPANY. P.R.R. May 4, 1920. Account accumulation. 93 Embargoed all freight, carload and less destined to points on or via DELA- WARE AND HUDSON CO. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, railroad fuel, coal, fertilizer, field and garden seed, nursery stock, newsprint paper. Cancelled May 28, 1920. P.R.R. June 27, 1920.Account accumulation. 153 Embargoed all freight, carload and less, destined to points on or via DELA- WARE AND HUDSON CO. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, fuel coal for railroads and hospitals, and public utilities. Cancelled July 12, 1920. 16 Dates placed, Extended, D&Hem- Modified, bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargoes. P.R.R. July 27, 1920.Account accumulation. 222 Embargoed all freight, carload and less from all points destined to all points on or via DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. EXCEPT: Perish- able, livestock, foodstuffs for human consumption, railroad fuel and coal for public utilities. Cancelled Aug. 17, 1920. CRRofNJ May 5, 1920. Account inability of connections to accept. 195 ipa all freight via DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Wilkes- arre. Cancelled May 20, 1920. CRRofNJ Aug. 30, 1920.Account accumulation. 4A9Q Embargoed all freight, carload and less, routing via DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. at Wilkes-Barre when destined to points on or via the B. & M. EXCEPT: Livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, food and feed for human and animal consumption, field and garden seed, fertilizer, agricul- tural implements, railroad supplies, and fuel. Cancelled Sept. 7, 1920. B.&0. July 28, 1920.Account hold order placed by connecting lines. G-1174 Embargoed all freight destined points on or via DELAWARE AND HUD- SON CO. Cancelled Aug. 11, 1920. 17 SUMMARY 1916 Cars were held on D. & H. at the following stations: January—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Cobleskill, Cherry Valley Jct., Oneonta, Worcester, Nineveh, Binghamton—Penna. Divi- sion. February—Mechanieville, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Delanson, Oneonta, Duanesburg, Nine- veh, Binghamton. March— April—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton, Worcester. May—Mechanicville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Worcester, Cooperstown Jct., Oneonta, Nineveh, Sidney, Binghamton—Penna. Div. June—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, Oneonta, Nineveh, Binghamton, July—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, Delanson, Oneonta. Aug.—Mechanicville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, Delanson, Oneonta, Nineveh, Binghamton and Penna. Div. Sept.— Oct.—Mechanicville, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penna. Division, Saratoga Division. Nov.—Mechanicville, Elnora, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Nineveh, Wor- cester, Binghamton and Penna Division. Dec.— Total for Year................ 122,674. Cars were held on following connections: Jan. Erie, DL&W, LV, PRR, CNJ. Feb. Erie, DL&W, LV, PRR, CNJ. Mar. Apr. Erie, DL&W, LV, CNJ. May Erie, DL&W, LV, CNJ, PRR. June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Erie Nov. Erie, DL&W, LV, CNJ, PRR. Dee. Votal. for Veaticss wie awa decane 30,272. CARS HELD FOR B. &. M. RR. Year 1916. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 2487 2274 246 552 2 2253 2469 289 603 3 1931 2532 222 789 4 2055 2386 568 740 5 1918 1799 139 882 6 2445 1987 513 106 7 1877 1822 268 8 1845 918 350 9 1817 1076 185 1310 10 1685 698 362 1651 11 1721 492 392 1672 12 1744 1450 1955 13 1569 1671 2227 14 1429 733 1684 2363 15 1277 880 1596 2199 16 877 771 1639 2387 17 646 652 1555 2595 18 389 657 1444 2263 19 337 421 1514 2298 20 578 1133-2053 21 486 213 1027 2051 22 678 164 740 2025 23 630 1942 24 408 1709 25 1506 26 1334 27 1102 28 2182 843 29 686 183 481 30 2551 244 31 227 30252 5856 5419 18453 1464 654 4456 17480 38690 Total 122,674 19584 1458 226 1629 val 7304 On Connections Total 30,272 ” 19 SUMMARY 1917 Cars were held on D. & H. at the following stations: Jauuary— February—Mechanicville, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Delanson, Duanesburg, Oneonta, Nine- veh, Binghamton and Penna. Div. March—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Delanson, Duanesburg, Oneonta Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton and Penna. Div. ? April—Mechanicville, Crescent, Elnora, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Worcester, Oneonta, Nineveh, Binghamton and Penna. Div. May—Mechanicville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Sid- ney, Nineveh, Binghamton and Penna. Div. June— July— August— September—Mechanieville, Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, One- onta, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penna Div October— November—Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk. December—Elnora, Crescent, Mohawk, So. Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Worcester, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Bainbridge, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penna. Div. Total for Year................ 91,383. Cars were held on following connections: Jan. Feb. Mar. April May PRR, CNJ, LV. June July Aug. Sept. PRR, CNJ, LV, Erie, DL&W. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total for Year..............6. 10,106. CARS HELD FOR B. & M. RR. Year 1917. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1 556 1489 1067 9 652 937 1257 AA 3 232 674 1026 1334 ; 4 324 965 995 1384 137 132 5 514 936 1407 1256 613 6 400 784 1583 1149 584 180 7 271 1008 1772 2126 1778 8 347 852 1861 956 1327 155 9 386 1021 1448 659 1218 10 413 912 1460 563 1207 11 983 890 1356 527 1707 597 12 1145 982 1138 425 1669 655 13 1624 1036 1684 660 14 1005 795 1543 1280 15 771 577 1152 1043 16 763 687 837 iF 781 737 18 140 799 19 641 20 584 21 607 22 697 23 99 618 24 335 576 25 279 65 695 26 948 90 299 621 27 864 284 200 578 28 130 940 320 391 29 1140 346 439 30 1251 373 594 31 1621 23 396 Total 5145 22793 20293 12726 15306 564 14556 Total 91383 On Connections 7726 2380 Total 10106 21 SUMMARY 1918 Cars were held on D. & H. at the following stations: January—Elnora, Mohawk, Delanson, Worcester, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Bainbridge, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penna. Div. February— March—Mohawk, April—Mohawk. May— June— July— August— September— October— November— December— Total for Year................ 826. No cars held on connections for year 1918. CARS HELD FOR B. & M. RR. Year 1918. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dee. 401 56 248 omarnrnrinnnkti tbr wor wow nnn nnn ne nnn #F HBP KP BP Pe PP PP FSesp DOA ABA THBWHONHHFP SCH WAND oF WHNYNH OS 121 Ttls. 401 121 304 Total 826 On Connections—No cars. 23 SUMMARY 1919 Federal Period, no per diem received or paid B. & M. RR., and no reclaims made. omenNannrr Ww NH & SCowonrnsnNNNYN NY DYN DY DYDD BBY eH he eee POD WANA AAP HHH SCH MANA TKRwWDWNHO CARS HELD FOR B. & M. RR. Year 1919. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dee, Federal Period, no per diem received or paid B. & M. RR., and no reclaims made. 24 SUMMARY 1920 Cars were held on D. & H. at the following stations: January—Nothing. February—Mechanicville, Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Cobleskill, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penn. Division. March—Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Bainbridge, Nineveh, Bingham- ton, Saratoga Division. April—Mechanieville, Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Nineveh, Binghamton, Saratoga Division. May—Mechanieville, Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Worcester, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Bainbridge, Nineveh, Binghamton, Bean Division. June—Mechanieville, Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Oneonta, Central Bridge, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton, Saratoga Division, Penn. Division. July—Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Cobleskill, Wor- cester, Oneonta, Bainbridge, Sidney, Nineveh, Binghamton, Saratoga Division, Penn. Division. August—Mechanicville, Crescent, Mohawk, South Schenectady, Duanesburg, Delanson, Central Bridge, Worcester, Oneonta, Wells Bridge, Sidney, Bainbridge, Nineveh, Binghamton, Penn. Division and Saratoga Division. September—Mechanieville. October—Mechanicville, Mohawk, Delanson. November-——Nothing. December—Nothing. Total for Year...............4. 167208. Cars were held on the following connections: Jan. Feb. LV, Erie, DL&W, CNJ, PRR. Mar. Erie. Apr. May Erie, CNJ, PRR, NYOW, DL&W, LV. June Erie, LV, PRR. July NYOW, CNJ, LV, Erie, PRR. Aug. NYOW, PRR, CNJ. Erie. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dee. Total for Year.............05- 88431. CARS HELD FOR B. & M. RR. Year 1920. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. 1 1626 166 590 1294 1414 461 2 1644 286 769 1590 165 3 1643 249 746 1697 79 4 1734 816 361 1457 5 1596 967 245 1543 6 1687 1887 1449 7 1877 2515 1498 8 262 1071 3218 1128 9 537 810 3440 1076 10 793 564 2979 11 1225 448 3241 12 1235 484 3123 13 1204 270 3230 14 1250 3105 15 1634 8205 16 1816 3104 17 2030 2836 18 1783 2557 19 1669 2344 318 115 20 1708 2217 576 331 21 1423 1982 918 966 22 823 1726 1817 1562 23 739 1520 1906 1937 24 27 1473 2040 2258 3806 25 43 1516 2140 2487 185 26 161 1607 2048 2750 373 27 173 55 1265 2083 2463 1463 28 170 81 1230 1725 2337 1349 29 678 150 1098 1259 2158 1390 125 30 1186 175 1272 1416 2198 952 155 31 1480 985 1940 962 Total 20131 3848 15985 61159 18836 26427 19832 280 705 On Connections 19622 34695 7995 14455 6664 Total 26 Dee. — 167203 §8431 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the B. & M. RR. Month of January, 1920. No cars held for the month of January. 27 T0Z Le_|P9T 62 PLT 8Tz Sse 208 ¢ |t Its lz 69 l9¢_ |sz et loca 91 8% e92z 90% lpz_|T2zT laze |LOG IL o¢ lz LI Ga -lgg_|o8z 68 oo cose TLL |e |612 1862 [STS re_|2e 01 GZ ge luge lret lezt | Te cre |18 |poatlte |20e |z09 Sr |0T GLI GS gg _lizge jote |Is9t | 02 sose lr lron 808 1689 POT DD 10 98 ge lorry lote |zrt | 6T omze |99 zy lat |g9e lee ¥9 Z8_(leP 008 ge lepr lore lest | 8st LgLe |\0z [202 lat |sre |z9T l96r lesz SPT Ine LLG ge losr lore lest | LT gcze rer Ist tse looz |ssr ls Pel lh 29% ge losr izee |2z0T | 9T G99% v Pre |96T |L8F 621. 188 GcT ge [gon LOT | ST 6882 ler 1162 Lge |ezr_l9sp |90T 01 |Fe Hy 98 gg igzr loee |20T | FT 6692 |g _|L0F zee [Sree SP gzt_ lost [rz log l|se |szr zor | &T 9962 |e |LOF ose lots |g6g |g¢ 82 IP eT g9_ log |ge lorp log 128 SE esze log |zzg let soe Ist 1g_|t g9_|gz_|t9 log lse ozs 96 a 86 og los 98F 19 OT 6611 Ge9 |12 og ose 69 6 29% | I8T 18 8 — ROL) By) 7) Oo) Oo] & < & im & ZA #) = gS S g 9 3) 8 ge = | aed s/2/2/F)°* |) a) FP EIS (| slalrlsl Fl *|8| 2/5) ele PP lojel| |el oles |el/*|ele) ale) ele) 2] 2) * z. a a s = Bel eee ye : , = 8 8 "0Z6T ‘Areniqe,7 Jo UO] ‘UUW BF A OU Joy ppey sreQ ST “ON ony 28 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the B. & M. RR. Month of March, 1920 pe r g| 8 a > 3 & 3 2 < E 3 a Bisa) 82 )8) 2 le |e) sal #18 « Oo] & S Se] > | a | 8 s 2) 2) eS) ee ley ele eS) Ss Dae|]S | 8/AlAl6/Hh/21 a] & | S| a | Total 26 59 49| 538 161 27 70 53| 50 173 28 117 53 170 29 204 53 51| 16] 11] 89 254 678 30 623 53 1| 118 18} 80] 35] 169] 89) 1186 31 901| 44] 538] 154] 98 101| 29] 107 1480 Month of April, 1920 Rule No. 15 Cars held for the B. & M. RR. UOISIAI(, €30}e1eS surely Uy uojweYysurg Yoaouln 2] U09IQ uosueaq Sinqsouenq *ALYIS ‘OS yMeqOW quadsaIZ STAI 60608 V8ST oot ST CoV i6T |0LE ITS ITT OVI 9v_lz6_ler lee 19 IPtt 1g ST6T 179 __|VPT 9 19S LEV IG 1806 198 ITT && 9b_\L9T 1oh (66 TET 18ce 0& 96LT Tt 9.6 Tey iL IST |98T IST LIT 9F_|2c6 leh_ 168 OTT iTSe 66 6c6T Oct 9 &L9 16 196T_ IPOT 18 st 9b 1692 ish 168 _ 1696 1692 86 9ETS OLT 9 |8% LV9 |G __|¥66 109 _18 86 ZOT 1286 16S 168 _iLPT |ac8 LG L8ES LES 8 GEG 16 «(L9G |Get IST eL |T6 |LT 1942 |e |68 1102 I8Se 96 S0ES 866 6 OSG |I§ 0&6 189 _ 16 69 _|T6 |20T |92e leo _ |68 109s |P6e G6 GTS 8Ie 6 STS ick |66T 1601 |e 18 |T6_|20T i0TS 6E_ _|TVE IT8E ve SSVG V0G 6188 GLO |0T |69T I6TT 16 626 116 |80T iOS 6&__|8&6 IGLT &% O&LE 961 6 129 L&L 19 |8PT |SST 87 908 |T6 IS0T 1066 68 179 192 GG 060E SLT 6 TOT ec. IT |set lta 169 SP_i8&v 116 |S0T |Ler 6& 1898 ITT? Te 8STé 69T 6 102 669 16 166T 16h 169 T_ i8p_ |L¢S (16 (SOT IL97 6E_ 1086 ITT? 0G LIGS& cSt 6 169 |8L 1928 16 I80T [eb 129 169 08 |06h IT6 (80T |PSP 169 [68 GSP IS8% 61 9696 cvt 6 lett lz |gs9 lo _lovt Isv_lé9_ {86 08_ |66F 116 |80T [297 169 168 196G 108 st V69E S&L 89 |vL 199 i¢LS 18 [é6T 119 169 186 08 IL69 IT6 [SOT 1S0G 169 168 1697S lOc LT LOTY Lot SI |TOT (STT 1604 19 I88T 199 ISOT 186 08_|¥99 116 IS0T [89S [69 168 acd |0G6 ot STOV SOT GI 1201 1201 1P8P |G 1206 1O0T ISOT 196 08 |S0L 116 |80T 1667 169 166 i262 (08 SE COLE STT 19 |90T |S07 I€T i60T 196 IST 196 08 _ i¥TL 116 iSO0T |LSV 169 166 \76L 106 VI 0668 IOTT IZOT pL |ver lOzr is |e9T |Z0T [e0T 186 168 108 ITP8 106 IS0T 1942 169 [66 1608 [086 ITZ st G98E 16 rL_l6ot lsrt_lzse lr ieee lttt lrot |s6_l6s log leo. |t6 Isc 92 l6g 168 _ |992 1088 él Soay E 8 _l60g Ig2t lr6s I2__lz9e ls6_ |66 [G6 l6h |18 1669 168 |89 1092 169 [68 I8SL 108 IT GOLE |LTT ILLT 8 _|szz lest |76 [te Iz2e loot lop iS6 18% IG 1029 168 119 |8he 169 166 ISPL 1066 OL OZEE_ 168 ri_|r___|vea eta |x9% let Igot ert Itz |g6 Ite {t9 |tsp les iso lrre 69 Ith 889 |Lb8 6 SIGE 6L1 love l6re lot l6tz leet los lee |ts |t9 ItTs¢ 8g 19T¢ |6G ITP IThL 1662 8 TOTS 9¢z loge lg6t |2 l9tz loxt |ts_|g6_|pt |t9 1/802 SST 129 GLO_|80T L 981% OLE |20T 196 196 IT 119 ITSP TS c&L IGOT 1261 | 9 196 88 GGL bo) S 918 69S 696 |_ 7 6VG 676 |_ & 986 986 | _ @ 991 g9T | T maf eye |S o/s S| ele gle) 2) Ble al eisiele/ P/E) 9) e\~s e/S)jeiel ma) PP e/Blel/esl|el alr sisi" 8 Blel Fig) a = el al 7] ® SlyolBl/elE| ele lelele/Ble/2)] 2) = | yl 2/8 8 BS ae ae : x 5 9g 0Q 0a < oO oO Oz6T ‘Ae JO WUC "aH WN F “da 94) 29} PRY Se ST ON SIN 31 GSST_I6FT 68 100T 102 I8T 18S 16 98 Ide (|P9T 109 167 6L 08 Q9LET 169 68 178 l6TT Io iso 19 98 l08 |P9T 109 67 1629 66 LE8T_|L9T O€ 128 IG2T 16 IL9 ILP 98 IG9T |P9T 109 16h IPPL 86 88Ts SOT oe_l68 |l0s2 19 [TL [9 |T9 ITT 198 [9% (IF9T 109 67 J0T8 IT92 LG 870G_ 109 ole |b Ly |89 =|T9 ITT 198 199 |79T 109 67 1968 1622 96 OrTG |60T V6o eG IGG 189 129 88 |96T I9TT 6h l6h [078 ILTE GS 0P0Z 108 666 19T 108 12S 08 |222 |9TT 6h 167 [808 |2Te I&& VG 906T_|00T LLY |TT 198 |70 628 _|9TT 16h I6P_ 1862 ITST 1Z& &@ LI8T 186 LOG IST IOTT IST GGé |9TT 167 691 GG 816 OTT I67 6S 16 91g og ¥eS 06 8Té og G0G v9 61 6I¢T Te |G9T [877 |SST 16 I8h_CITT GTg ILT [eP Iv I ma le)elcle/elelelzigle/ele elg|/s|sie)s|* o| 2]. Pr rE |S [ml al el eis | si els ]/nisle|s e|/ RW! wn : Bis] : Be PRS aes, | Soe gh Re es a1 ie b| S15 | & D/el|s s|B) FA) a] & a8 | at eS ee 5 mR | oa ‘OZ6T ‘ounr Jo YyUOT “Ua WN B “A OU} JOJ poy SIV GT “ON PNY G)6¢ |LOT 1868 pit lt 19 12 68 ESP zv_l68e l0sz 9g28 |LeT |S68 G7 18 |26_ |v 68 LLY Zp__|068 1208 eggs Igp_ |eeor 161 16 tet |e 12 68 OL zv__ lary |s82 ozge loot |90zT ozz lzr_ ls lp ls 68 e97 zv_|gug lesz O67s PST [PHOT 981 {Zt \|sot l9t_ |t¥ 68 LPL lech zv__|06¢ |LTS 9107 [SST |8OTT pre ig__iag_iite [sr 168 068 zyv_|gg9 less 6L9E |SZt_|OLTT ezz |¢z_ |got |Lb OT 19 gGz zy |gue |vEes pore leh |9PIT 162 |61 _|P&T OT SLT Zv_|9L9 |PEs LEGL 108% 1Z&6 6LE 19% |69T GT 769 |Z9T ZOST |g2 1828 PLS StI Z 8 Teh 996 eel ors Tee Tee GTI GIT GhS or |Is__lge_|t 2 Orst leg [88 9 |e lee |90 IP ve SP TSSt 28 |66L 9 |leot |ltz |v Is vg gz_|9ze_ |TS 7291 19 1698 9 |9o, |9 \|¢¢ IP on |tg sr \608 log e0TZ IST 1808 9 lozz lor lire Is 6 igzt_l09 l6r_ |T8t wule|lelejelo|s/B E/E E/El 2 |S) fei 8) ee] g elml*\ 3 ° = 1 o Oo ° 3 oO oh es) = 2 le he Se EVA )R IA) e Ala 2 |~| Fs 3 3 |é s|/2/d g Ajc€lalslei/aleiAls] & 1 | 68 560| 78] 33] 18) 4 756 2 | 560 33 593 3 | 520 383 58 611 4 520 520 5 48| 431 17 718 574 6 [OO ce elle el 365 | eso of |) f| 324 8 302 | | | | 302 9 225 | 225 10 70| 169 4| 82 325 11 53| 100 43| 4] 200 12 21| 29 4| 54 a beac l 30 Cars held for N. Y.N. H. & H.R. R. Month of June, 1920. a 2 a BIS = e ~_— 2i/8/8] 8 Eyl et et as 4 73 73 8 96 96 9 103 103 10 119 119 12 185 135 14 69| 69 18 16] 16 Cars held for N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. Month of July, 1920. Campbell Hall Susquehanna 2 5 5 A Total 81 Cars held for N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. Month of August, 1920 @ 2 a EF IS = eat = = 2 ee) Aizrole 1 | 256 256 2 | 235! 64) 299 3 | 106| 64] 170 6 37| 387 Cars held for N. Y. N. H. & H.R. R. Month of September, 1920 Nothing. 82 Cars held for N. Y.N.H. & H.R. R. Month of October, 1920. a Q an a &S FQ a = Sizgi¢e| 8 x 3° 3 ° QA Ay oO eH 16 156| 39] 195 Cars held for N.Y. N. H. & H.R. R. Month of November, 1920. Nothing. Cars held for N. Y.N. H. & H.R. R. Month of December, 1920. Nothing. 33 W. H. Williams Exhibit No.1 4.1 Lehigh Valley Railroad Company 143 Liberty Street New York E. E. Loomis President January 20th, 1921 Mr. W. H. Williams, Chairman, Wabash Railway Company, 120 Broadway, New York City. Dear Sir: Referring to your communication of the 6th instant, with respect to embargoes placed by the Boston & Maine against its connections, etc.: I am attaching hereto, as requested, statements showing cars held for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad and embargoes placed by the Lehigh Valley Railroad and the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad from 1916 to 1920 inclusive, which I trust will give the information you desire. Yours very truly, E. E. LOOMIS, President. STATEMENT OF CARS HELD FOR THE N. Y., N. H. & H. RAILROAD DURING 1916 TO 1920, INCLUSIVE, ON WHICH RECLAIM WAS PRESENTED. DATE. © ON AA OW Ow nN NN NY NNN ND BF BF FP BS RP HP BP Be RK Fowewmonroonr Wwnbroevwaonnrtaunartr woNDeFe O&O Total... CARS HELD FOR N. Y., N. H. & H. R.R. 529 914-176 450 1085 158 323 911 —s 119 388 888 179 80 902 =. 272 178 = 855 —Ss«d199 141 984 227 41 717) ~—-328 29 920 347 182 1086 =. 257 90 699 344 83 806 380 65 799 642 73 712 «677 81 611 = 262 75 324 =218 71 52 = 499 24 213 = 782 —_—— Year 1916 JAN. Fes. Mar. Apr. May JuNeE Jury da Aq Ploy sx¥0 Jo iequimu oftzoAy. ‘22 JO2}UO;) [%49Poq SULINP SATSNIOUI “GTG] “toquiejdeg 07 g1¢{ “Amp Utojy ojup uNEjOOI O IN wo iaqulosoc] x x_ AOQUIGAO Ky x x 4eq079() x x Joqulajdeq x = qsnany x x Amr x x ounp a a AST a Gor Slo Se1 judy a a 5 ee Se1 IEW a oze QE eres sess see. See eee eee eee ses e ssa ee sus eseuse “S51 oo eee eee sense sess ee re i, Arenaqeq a 001 Pp re Le Arenuey a tz te 06 664 82 26 G2 {2 ¥2 £6 GZ 12 Of GE SI 21 91 St Fl Sf Zi mW OF 6 & £ 9 S$ F c 6 tf sist HY GC add ( UMOYS 9]4p 10 J09yo UI SIOM Jey} SoOsIuquIG’ Ayuopl siequinNy) 05 HH? a AQ pied sid jo Joqumu SseIeAy é3 JIoquisc0(7 JOQUIGAO KT 2802 sseeeee Cees eee eee eee ee eee eee see eee wees ee ne | A 1901039() egress: F681 saqure;daq pests PaeT OeeE ests eee eee eves. a ne eee qentay ane oune a ee ne re re re a “Srel i Tcy qoreyy CCpT ee ee ees se see se eee eee Hee ee ee eee eee se ee ee see see sseeessessesessusesetoesvsevsvsesoeseveaspoesestese eesesevee ese se tone CCH] AIGNIGS iT ATenUee it te OF 66 86 26 #36 S26 76 2 ce 16 OC Gl SI Zl 8 Sk FL Sf GE I OL 6 8 ZL 9 S&S + & 6 6+ 46} SO HY G add ( UMOYSs Sejep UseAjeq Jooyo Ui S1OM FUT) SoOsiuqurg AjjUepl sloquin\y) 09 Hy ad Aq pjey 8189 Jo Joqumu osvIcAy a0quIg00q «GUO a JoquIeAONT «ssw eZ 00033 « oucu a toqulojdoq 2u0Uu a gsnany ou0u a : . Ae so euou 69 sunr ~—«s: suo a Avy ou0u at fidy ou0u qoieyy sis uo 700 Areniasy «suo COT 09 H ® CF AlcAtjop 10} 4441035 4suresu “34°47 Aq pre] soosrequig, ON Arenuee euo0u o6¢ te 06 G6 386 26 92 Sc to £4 fe 12 OF 61 SI 21 9 SI FE &f Zk ot «Of 6 & Z 9 G F S G tT 916. 9) HY dad Aud (U@AOYs $8}4p U0 4599 UI SioM Feu) SoOsIuquUIG AfQUopI Sloquin \y) 05 H ® a Aq pjey 81vo jo Joquinu esu19Ay 25 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 141 THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY GENERAL OFFICE, PENNSYLVANIA STATION RALPH PETERS, PRESIDENT, NEW YORK, January 18, 1921. Mr. W. H. Williams, Chairman of the Board, Wabash Railway Company, 120 Broadway, New York City. Dear Sir :— As requested in your letter of January 6th, and for use in defence of the so- called New England Case now pending before the Interstate Commerce Commission, I send you herewith a statement of cars held under reclaim by the Long Island Rail- road for the New Haven during the four months, April, May, June and July, 1920, together with a resume of embargoes placed against connections during the year 1920, by the N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R., Central New England R. R., Boston & Maine R. R., Boston & Albany R. R. and Rutland R. R. Trusting this is the information you desire, I am, Very truly yours, RALPH PETERS, President. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD RULE No. 15 RECLAIMS—CARS HELD FOR THE NEW HAVEN RAILROAD—1920 April May 94 84 46 40 64 129 129 215 52 71 75 22 20 63 40 111 29 20 Note. No cars held under reclaim other months. June 14 38 28 July 22 16 46 20 RESUME OF EMBARGOES ON THE NEW York, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD AND CENTRAL NEW ENGLAND DURING THE YEAR 1920. L. I. Em- 9 10 11 245 284 18 17 20 34 37 Dates placed, N. Y.N.H. Extended, & H. Em- bargo No. bargo No. or Cancelled Modified March 1. Modified April 5. Cancelled May 38. March 1. Modified March 30. Cancelled May 6. March 2. Cancelled March 30. April 7. Cancelled May 6. April 10. Modified April 30. Resume of Embargo. Placed account accumulation. Covers L. C. L. freight from all connections and steamship lines (except N. E. 8. S. Line). EXCEPTIONS: perishable freight, foodstuffs, newsprint papers and railroad supplies. to permit foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, printing papers, printing ink, empty ink drums, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments, surgical dressings, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fertilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying materials and household goods. Account accumulation. Carload freight via Campbell Hall for Maybrook, N. Y., except livestock, perishable freight, newsprint papers, feed for animal consumption, railroad supplies, Govern- ment freight and freight covered by F. T. C. or G. O. C. permits. to permit foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, tank cars loaded and empty, charcoal, coke, printing paper, printing ink, empty ink drums, copper spelter, scrap brass, lead, zinc, medicine, drugs, surgical instruments, surgical dressings, agri- cultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fer- tilizer, fertilizer materials, spraying material, canning machinery, tin plate for the manufacture of cans and household goods. All carload freight from the Long Island R. R. except livestock, perishable freight, newsprint paper, feed for animal consump- tion, railroad supplies, government freight and freight covered by F. T. C. and G. O. C. permits. All freight for Harlem River except livestock, perishable, food- stuffs and printing paper. Account of congestion. All freight from the P. R. R., C. R. R. of Nd is V Be Re de LR. Ry BC, By By via Bay Ridge. Harlem River, Oak Point, Fresh Pond Junction, or Port Morris, New York, effective at once, all G. O. C. or other permits can- celled. to permit all freight via Fresh Pond Junction (this cancels re- strictions against L. I. R. R.) 3 L. I. Em- bargo No. bargo No. or Cancelled 405 468 471 5438 614 615 693 & H. Em- 42 45 47 51 58 60 66 Dates placed, N. Y.N. H. Extended, Modified April 16. Modified April 19. Cancelled April 19. April 26. Cancelled May 25. April 26. Cancelled May 138. May 14. Cancelled May 21. May 27. Superseded June 26. May 27. Cancelled Sept. 15. June 9. Extended June 23 Extended June 24. Cancelled June 26. Resume of Embargo. Account accumulation. All freight destined to stations Water- bury to Winsted, Conn., inclusive, Waterbury, Conn., to Camp- bell Hall, inclusive, Danbury, Conn., to Pittsfield and State Line, Mass., inclusive, Hawleyville to Litchfield, Conn., inclusive. to permit all freight Waterbury to Winsted, Conn., inclusive. Account accumulation. All freight for Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. at Fox Point, Rhode Island. Account accumulation. L. C. L. for Fall River, Mass. Account accumulation. All freight destined to or for handling at Hartford, Conn. Account of congestion. All freight via Albany or West Albany Gateway, except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, printing ink, empty ink drums, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments, surgical dressings, agricultural im- plements, nursery stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, spray- ing materials, loaded and empty tank cars, household goods and railroad supplies. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 891. Account accumulation. L. C. L., Bridgeport, Conn. Account accumulation. All L. C. L. freight from the Long Island R. R. except foodstuffs for human consumption. to cover all freight via the N. Y. C. R. R. at Port Morris, N. Y., destined to or via New Haven, Conn. to cover all freight. Dates placed, N. Y.N.H. Extended, Modified June 9. Extended June 24. Superseded June 26. June 24, Superseded June 26. June 24. Superseded June 26. June 26. Modified June 30. Cancelled July 6. June 26. Superseded July 12. L.I.Em- & H. Em- bargo No. bargo No. or Cancelled 694 64 857 65 864 73 889 77 890 70 891 76 June 26. Superseded July 12. Resume of Embargo. Account accumulation. All freight from connections at May- brook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except foodstuffs for human con- sumption and railroad supplies. to cover foodstuffs for human consumption destined to or via New Haven, Conn. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 890. Account of congestion. Covers all freight from connections at Beacon, Poughkeepsie and Rhinecliff, N. Y., including all freight to or via New Haven, Conn. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 891. Account accumulation. All freight via New Haven Line of the New England Steamship Co. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 889. Account accumulation. All freight destined New Haven, Conn. Also to or from the New Haven Line of the New England Steam- ship Co. to permit all freight to or from the New Haven Line of the New England Steamship Co. Account accumulation. All freight from connections at May- brook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except perishable, livestock, Gov- ernment freight, foodstuffs for human and animal consumption, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, agricul- tural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seeds, fertilizer and materials, spraying materials, household goods, ink drums and railroad supplies. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 1016. Account of congestion. All freight via Albany, West Albany. Rhinecliff, Poughkeepsie or Beacon, N. Y., except perishable, live- stock, Government freight, foodstuffs for human and animal con- sumption, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, agricultural implements, nursery stock, seeds, fertilizer and spraying materials, household goods and railroad material. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 1016. 5 Dates placed, N. Y.N. H. Extended, Modified June 30. Cancelled July 9. July 10. Cancelled August 2. July 12. Modified July 16. Superseded August 25. August 25. Cancelled Sept. 16. L.I.Em- & H. Em- bargo No. bargo No. or Cancelled 929 81 1011 89 1016 96 1508 190 1636 829 Sept. 15. Cancelled Dec. 28. Resume of Embargo. Account accumulation. All freight except perishable destined Fall River, Mass. Account accumulation. L. C. L. destined Fall River, Mass. Account accumulation. All freight via Rensselaer, Albany, West Albany, Bay Ridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, Maybrook or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except perishable, livestock, Government freight, railroad supplies, foodstuffs, tank cars loaded or empty, medicines, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, soap and soap powder, sulphur, tanners’ extract, printer’s ink, ink drums, carbon or lamp black, carbide, binder twine, hemp and sisal, canning machinery, baskets, barrels, food containers of all kinds, agricultural implements, nursery stock, field and garden seed, fertilizer, fertilizer and spraying materials, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, billets, cotton, wool, leather, household goods, clay products, plaster and plaster boards. to permit acceptance of L. C. L. freight in lots of 10,000 Ibs. or more for one station on the New Haven or for delivery to one connecting line beyond. by L. I. R. R. Embargo. 1508. Account accumulation. All freight from connections at Bay Ridge, Harlem River, or Oak Point and Maybrook, N. Y., or Campbell Hall, N. Y., except perishable, livestock, Government freight, railroad supplies, foodstuffs, freight in tank cars, medi- cines, drugs, surgical instruments and dressings, printer’s ink, ink drums, carbon or lamp black, carbide, binder twine, hemp and sisal, canning machinery, food containers of all kinds, copper, spelter, zinc, lead, billets, household goods, leather, L. C. L. freight for Bridgeport, Waterbury, New Britian, New Haven, Hartford, Springfield, Providence, Worcester, Boston, Fall River or New Bedford, loaded direct to destination and for other points when loaded direct to a designated transfer or destination. Account of congestion. All freight for points on the Shore Line Electric Ry. Dates placed, N.Y.N.H. Extended, L.I.Em- &H.Em- Modified bargo No. bargo No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. 1666 211 Sept. 17. a accumulation. L. C. L. freight for transfer Cedar Hill, onn, Cancelled Oct. 26. 1789 253 Oct. 7. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight from P. R. R., C. R. R. of N. J., L. V. R. R., L. I. R. R. and N. Y. C. R. R. via Bay Ridge, Harlem River, Oak Point, Fresh Pond or Port Morris, N. Y., except Government freight and railroad supplies. Cancelled Oct. 18. 1813 258 Oct. 18. Account accumulation. Carload freight for Hartford, Conn., and Providence, R. I., except foodstuffs, perishable, Government freight and railroad supplies. Cancelled Oct. 14. 1866 274 Oct. 21. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight for Providence, R. I., ex- cept foodstuffs, perishable, Government freight or railroad supplies. Cancelled Oct. 25. 2015 3382 Nov. 23. Account accumulation. Carload freight for Union Freight Rail- road Bulk Track delivery, Boston, Mass., except shipments authorized by R. D. Fitsmaurice, Gen. Supt., Boston. Cancelled Jan. 4. RESUME OF EMBARGOES ON THE BosToN & MAINE RAILROAD DURING THE YEAR 1920. L. I. Em- bargo No. 6106 6144 B. & M. Embargo No. 270 282 Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Jan. 10. Account accumulation. Carload freight to or via Clyde Steam- ship Co. from Boston, Mass. Cancelled Jan. 27. Jan. 26. Account accumulation. Carload freight for Lowell, Mass., ex- cept livestock and perishable. Cancelled Feb. 6. L. I. Em- Embargo bargo No. 6162 6168 6191 6208 72 118 179 B. & M. No. 288 287 292 296 300 303 307 313 Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled Jan. 31. Cancelled Feb. 9. Jan. 31. Cancelled Feb. 10. Feb. 9. Cancelled March 10. Feb. 11. Cancelled March 9. March 1. Cancelled April 6. March 12. Cancelled March 18. March 18. Cancelled March 25. March 30. Extended April 5. Cancelled April 13. Resume of Embargo. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight destined to or for han- dling at Boston, Mass. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight destined to or for hand- ling at Lawrence, Mass., except perishable and foodstuffs. Account accumulation. All freight to or in care of Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. from Boston. Account accumulation. All freight from all connections except perishable, livestock, railroad supplies, Government freight, food- stuffs and freight covered by F. T. C. and G. O. C. permits. Account accumulation. Carload freight to or in care of Mer- chants & Miners Transportation Co. from Boston. Account accumulation. All freight for points on Hoosac Tunnel and Wilmington R. R., except salt cake, lime, and merchandise cars. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight routing to or via Cana- dian Pacific Ry. at Newport, Vt., north and southbound. Account accumulation. Carload freight from or via the D. & H. Co. at Mechanicville, N. Y., except livestock, perishable, and railroad supplies. to cover all L. C. L. freight. L.I.Em- Embargo bargo No. 186 465 485 506 584 702 787 B. & M. No. 312 322 330 329 337 339 342 Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled March 381. Cancelled April 16. April 23 Cancelled May 6. April 30. Cancelled May 11. May 5. Revised May 13. Modified May 20. Cancelled June 1. May 21. Cancelled June 1. June 10. Cancelled Sept. 2. June 18. Cancelled July 8. Resume of Embargo. Account accumulation. All freight for consignees on the Wood- stock Ry. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight to or via the Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight for handling at Newport, Vt., except full cars for one destination. Account accumulation. All freight to or via the D. & H. and N. Y¥. C. R. R. at Mechanicville, Rotterdam Junction, and Troy, N. Y., or via these lines to the Rutland R. R., except livestock, perishable, news and book paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, and railroad supplies. to cover all freight for points on or via the B. & M. routing via the D. & H. and N. Y. C. R. R. at Mechanicville, Rotterdam Junction and Troy, N. Y., or via these lines to the Rutland R. R., thence B. & M., except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs, field and garden seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural implements and freight consigned to railroads. to permit acceptance of freight authorized by S. E. Miller, Supt. Transp., B. & M. R. R. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight to be handled at New- port, Vt. Account accumulation. Covers the ordering of carload freight for Bulk Track delivery at Boston, Minot St. or East Cambridge when arriving at Boston over Portland or Fitchburg Divisions. Account accumulation. L. C. L. freight for handling at New- port, Vt., except solid cars for one point not requiring handling at Newport. L. I. Em- Embargo bargo No. 828 1054 1177 1206 1736 B. & M. No. 345 384 401 405 457 Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled June 21. Modified June 26. Modified July 8. Cancelled July 16. July 15. Cancelled August 6. July 26. Revised August 9. Modified August 14. Revised Sept. 1. Cancelled Sept. 10. July 28. Cancelled August 12. Sept. 29. Cancelled Oct. 29 Resume of Embargo. Account of congestion. All freight for points on or via the B. & M. routing via the D. & H. and N. Y. C. R. R. at Mechanics- ville, Rotterdam Junction and Troy, N. Y., or via these lines to the Rutland R. R., thence B. & M., except livestock, perishable, foodstuffs, fertilizer, agricultural implements, newsprint paper, railroad supplies and U. 8S. Government freight. to permit acceptance of all freight for Mechanicville proper. to permit all carload freight. Account accumulation. All traffic to or via Merchants & Miners Transportation Co., Boston, Mass. Account of congestion. All freight routing via D. & H. or N. Y. C. R. R. for delivery on or via the B. & M., except livestock, per- ishable, newsprint paper, railroad supplies, Government freight, fertilizer, foodstuffs, agricultural implements and freight author- ized by S. E. Miller, Supt. Transp., B. & M. R. R. to cover all eastbound freight routing via Rotterdam Junction, Mechanicville or Troy, N. Y., routing via the N. Y. C. or D. & H. R. Rs., except fuel oil, livestock, perishable, newsprint paper, U. S. Government freight, foodstuffs, fertilizer and its materials, ship- ments authorized by 8. E. Miller, Supt. Transp., Boston, Mass. to permit all L. C. L. freight. to cover all carload freight via Rotterdam Junction, Mechanic- ville, or Troy, N. Y., when routing via the N. Y. C. or D. & H. R. Rs., except livestock, perishable freight, railroad supplies and U.S. Government freight. Account accumulation. All L. C. L. freight routing via New- port, Vt., except full cars for one point not requiring handling or transfer at Newport. Account accumulation. Waste paper for Otter River, Mass. 10 4 I B. & M. L.I.Em- Embargo bargo No. No. 2008 544 2024 546 L.I. Em- Embargo bargo No. 6159 B. & A. No. 96-68 Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Nov. 20. Account accumulation. All shipments of potatoes for all deliv- eries in Boston, Mass., including Cambridge, Charleston and Summerville, Mass., except shipments for delivery to Coastwise Steamship Lines when authorized by S. E. Miller, Supt. Transp., Boston, Mass. Cancelled Nov. 26. Nov. 26. Account accumulation. Waste paper for Otter River, Mass. Cancelled Dec. 7. RESUME OF EMBARGOES ON THE BosTON & ALBANY RAILROAD DURING THE YEAR 1920. Dates placed, Extended, Modified or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. Jan. 31. Account accumulation. L.C. L. freight from or to Boston, Mass. Cancelled Feb. 19. 131 520 887 1030 96-71 96-73 96-75 96-76 March 22. Account accumulation. All carload traffic to or via the Mer- chants & Miners Transportation Co., Boston, Mass. Cancelled August 28. May 8. Account of congestion. All eastbound carload and L. C. L. freight from connecting lines at Albany, West Albany Transfer and Rensselaer, N. Y., destined to points on or via the B. & A., ex- cept livestock, perishable, fuel oil, news and book print paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, and railroad supplies. Modified May 11. to permit U. 8S. Government shipments. Modified May 17. to permit agricultural implements. Cancelled June 1. June 26. Account of congestion. All freight from connections at Albany, West Albany Transfer and Rensselaer, N. Y., for points on or via the N. Y.N. H. & H.R. R. and B. & M. R. R., except livestock, perishable, news and book print paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural implements, U. 8. Government ship- ments and railroad supplies. Superseded July 138. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 1030. July 18. Account of congestion. All traffic for all points on or via the B. & A. R. R. routed via Albany, West Albany Transfer and Rensselaer, N. Y., except livestock, perishable freight, news and book print paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, agri- cultural implements, U. 8. Government freight and railroad supplies. Modified July 23. to permit all freight for points on the B. & A. R. R. Cancelled July 28. 1. Dates placed, B.& A. Extended, L.I.Em- Embargo Modified bargo No. No. or Cancelled Resume of Embargo. 1315 96-78 August 6. Account of congestion. All export freight via Boston, Mass., when for steamers sailing from B. & A. railroad docks, except grain and bulk freight for export to Canada, shipments con- signed to an officer of the U. S. Government or freight covered by G. O. C. permits issued by L. H. Peters, Traf. Control Mer., Chamber of Commerce, Boston, Mass. Still in effect. 1344 96-79 August 10. Account of congestion. All freight from connecting lines at Albany, West Albany Transfer and Rensselaer, N. Y., for points on or via the N. Y., N. H. & H. and B. & M. R. Rs., except live- stock, perishable, news and book print paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural implements, U. 8. Govern- ment shipments and railroad supplies. Superseded August1l. by L. I. R. R. Embargo 1365. 13865 96-80 August 11. Account of congestion. All eastbound freight from connecting lines at Albany, West Albany Transfer and Rensselaer, N. Y., destined to points on or via the B. & A. R. R., except livestock, perishable, news and book print paper, foodstuffs, seed, nursery stock, fertilizer, agricultural implements, U. S. Government ship- ments and railroad supplies. ‘ Modified August 26. to permit all freight for points on the B. & A. R. R. Cancelled Sept. 7. RESUME OF EMBARGOES ON THE CENTRAL VERMONT RAILROAD DURING THE YEAR 1920. 198 1-52 April 1. Account of congestion. All freight for all stations on the Wood- stock Ry. Cancelled Oct. 1. 429 1-54 April 19. Account of congestion. All traffic destined to points on or routing via the Grand Trunk R. R. at Swanton, Vt., or St. Johns, Que., except freight for Montreal, Que. Cancelled April 20. RESUME OF EMBARGOES ON THE RUTLAND RAILROAD DURING THE YEAR 1920. 1211 1290 July 29. Account accumulation. All freight destined to Fort Ticonderoga. Also all freight to or from the Delaware & Hudson Co. at Fort Ticonderoga, N. Y. Still in effect. 12 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 142 Circular No. 2072. AMERICAN RAILWAY ASSOCIATION CODE OF PER DIEM RULES Office of the General Secretary, 75 Church Street. New York, November 22, 1920. To the Members: Referring to Circular No. 2068, dated November 1, 1920, covering letter-ballot, on the recom- mendation of the Executive Committee of the American Railway Association and of the Advisory Committee of the Association of Railway Executives, which was approved by the Association of Railway Executives, that, effective November 1, 1920, the rate for the use of freight cars named in Rule 1, of the Code of Per Diem Rules be made $1.00 per car per day; if approved by a majority of the membership, that membership to represent two-thirds of the freight cars owned and con- trolled by the members of the American Railroad Association. The total membership is 389, and the cars owned and controlled by members—2,406,935. The majority requisite for approval is 195 memberships, owning and controlling 1,604,624 cars. The vote on Per Diem Rule 1 was as follows: Yes—285 memberships representing 2,166,445 cars owned and controlled. No—88 memberships representing 222,562 cars owned and controlled. Not voting—16 memberships representing 17,928 cars owned and controlled. The proposition to amend Per Diem Rule | is approved. Please take notice, therefore, that effective November 1, 1920, the per diem rate will be $1.00 per car per day. Respectfully, J. E. FAIRBANKS, General Secretary. 142 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. New York, August 24, 1920. Mr. Daniel Willard, Chairman, Advisory Committee, Association of Railway Executives, New York, N. Y. Dear Sir: At the present session of the Executive Committee of the American Railroad Association held today, in this office, the following resolution was adopted: “RESOLVED, That the Executive Committee recommend to the Advisory Committee of the Association of Railway Executives, that the Per Diem Rate be made $1.10, effective September 1, 1920, and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That should this recommendation be approved by the Advisory Committee, of the Association of Railway Executives, that the General Secretary be directed to submit the proposed rate to the Member Roads for vote by letter ballot in the usual manner, the new rate to take effect as of September 1, 1920, if approved by a majority of the membership, that membership to represent two- thirds of the cars owned or controlled by the members of the Association. A copy of the reports of the General Committee of Section V—Transportation presented to the Executive Committee on the subject of the Per Diem Rate is attached hereto. Respectfully, J. E. FAIRBANKS, General Secretary. SUBJECT—PER DIEM RATE To the Executive Committee: As requested, the General Committee of the Transportation Section, has considered what would be an adequate per diem rate to meet present conditions. It is unanimous in the opinion that the rate should cover the cost of ownership, embracing the following items: Maintenance Depreciation Taxes Interest at 6% Other allowances incident to ownership. This conforms to the conclusions reached by the McCrea Commission in 1909 and has been the basis used since that date by the Association in determining the per diem rate. Statistics have been obtained from members of the Association covering the cost of owner- ship for the calendar years 1918 and 1919. A statement is attached showing the actual costs for the calendar years 1918 and 1919, the estimated cost for the year 1920 and the average cost on basis of old and new cars that have been added, including those ordered and contemplated. MAINTENANCE The cost of maintenance, as reported for the year 1919, was 51.87c per car per day. Since 1919 there have been further increases in the cost of labor and material which approximate 20%. The conclusion of the Committee is that the 1919 figures should, therefore, be increased 20%. This would make the cost of maintenance 62.25c per day. DEPRECIATION The rate of depreciation for the years 1918 and 1919 was abnormally low. The average rate of depreciation, as reported by the railroads for the past 15 years, is 3.41%, and the Committee recommends that this figure be used. This would make the cost of depreciation 9.97c per day, as compared with 7.3c in 1919, or an increase of 36.6%. TAXES The average taxes, as reported for the year 1919, was $7.82 per year which represents .757 of one per cent. of the average cost of the cars reported. Using this same basis for the average of old and new cars would make $8.38 per car per year, or 2.29¢ per day. INTEREST It is the opinion of the Committee that 6% is equitable, based upon a lower rate on the old cars, many of which were built under car trusts and a somewhat higher rate on equipment recently acquired. OTHER ALLOWANCES INCIDENT TO OWNERSHIP Formerly 5c has been considered sufficient but it is recommended that this be increased 30%, which would make the figure 6.5c. RECOMMENDATION Based upon a careful study of the subject and taking into account all factors which should be considered in arriving at a proper per diem rate, the General Committee has reached the conclu- sion that an equitable rate would be $1.00 per car per day and recommends that this be made effec- tive September 1, 1920. : Respectfully submitted, GENERAL COMMITTEE. W. HH. Willams Exhibit No. TENTATIVE STATEMENT OF COST OF FREIGHT CAR OWNERSHIP FOR PER DIEM PURPOSES Average Cost of Freight Car Ownership Per Car Per Day Appears Under Followmg Headmgs A. On actual basis for calendar year 1918 B. On actual basis for calendar year 1919 C. On estimated basis for year 1920. (Hstimate covers increased cost of present maintenance, plus 46,892 new cars) 7 On basis of the new equipment exclusively, purchased at present prices On average of actual basis for old cars, and estimated increased cost of present mamtenance, plus ali of the 153,805 new cars that have been added, including those ordered or contemplated AVERAGE INVESTMENT PER CAR Year Number Cars Reported Total Cars Owned Average Cost Per Car On Which Averages Are Based Actual ee ce ee eee cence eee ecto eee eee eee ees sence eereeeeseveceeesss 1918 2,409,688 2,115,823 $950.61 Ata eee eee eee eee eee ee eee recesses eee e eure eee eeeeeeesvseseveee 1919 2,000,004 2,190,002 1,032.88 Actual for 1919 as reported plus estimated fornew............................................ 1920 2,121,016 1,066.77 New Equipment only. ..0. 0.0. eee eee eee eee ees ses eeeeee 158,805 3,045.66 oxtimated average as above........0.0.0.00..0.0000. 00. ee eee eee sees 2,119,459 1,107.20 AVERAGE PER DIEM COSTS A B C cD E 1918 1919 1920 New Cars Average Basis COSTS Per Y ear Per Day Per Year Per Day Per Year Per Day Per Year Per Day Per Year Per Day 1. Maintenance ..........7...-.............0..1.2 0. 5161.66 AA 35¢ $199.04 51 87¢ $221.21 62 .25¢ act .ak 62 .25¢ bool .al 62.25¢ 2. Depreciation ..........5.............0... +s sees ee eees 23.85 7.90 26.66 7,30 30.395 9.97 103.86 28.45 31.16 10.34 Be LPAKCS ooo cee tee ee certs reese nse eesesesess 6.12 1.63 7.82 2.14 8.08 2.21 23.06 6.32 8.38 2.29 4. Interest at G per cent ...1..........................,... bi .34 15.71 61.97 16.93 64°01 17,54 182.74 5006 66.43 13.20 B. Totals... ce ee eee eee ee uees o204.17 69. 64¢ $200.19 18 29¢ $a00.68 91 :97¢ $0306.87 147 _.038¢ So09. 16 93 08¢ 6. Add for other allowances.................7............ 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 716.14¢ 84,°79¢ 93 47¢ 153. 58¢ 99 58¢ 142 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. EXPLANATIONS: The estimated figures for 1920 are obtained by adding to the total cars reported for 1919, the new cars now built consisting of 40,000 cars allocated by the U. S. R. A. which it is estimated are not accounted for in the 1919 figures and 6,892 new cars or one-half the total amount ordered built since March Ist: As reported 2,680,684 $2,768,824,890. U.S. R. R.A. 40,000 116,698,800. 6,892 24,174,835. 2,727,576 $2,909,698,525. The estimates for new cars include those added by the U. S. R. R. A.; cars that have been ordered and those contemplated as follows: U.S. RB. A. 100,000 cars $291,747,000.* Now being built 13,784 “ 48,349,670. Contemplated 45,021 “ 148,569,730. Total 158,805 “ $483,666,400. Maintenance Costs have increased since 1919 account increases in material and labor. Figures are not available covering all freight car repairs but it is estimated that for 1920 there will be a 20% increase over 1919. This estimated figure has been used for new cars and for the average of all cars. Depreciation for 1918 (3.02%) and 1919 (2.58%) was abnormal. The average rate of depreciation for the past 15 years is 3.41% and this figure has been used for 1920, for the new cars and for the average of all cars. Taxes reported for 1919 represent .757 of cne per cent of the average cost and this basis is used for 1920, for the new cars and the average of all cars. Other allowances incident to ownership, formerly 5c, have been increased 25% in estimating for the basis of the present per diem rate. The items included in this statement conform to the conclusions reached by the McCrea Com- mission in 1909 in determining the factors which should enter into the per diem rate. *As reported by Division of Capital Expenditures, U. 8S. R. R. A. +As reported by Association of Railway Executives. Chicago, Illinois, August 14, 1920. SUMMARY, BY STATES AND DIVISIONS EXTRACT TAKEN FROM THIRTEENTH CENSUS (1910) OF THE UNITED STATES, VOL. &, PAGE 57 W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 142 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES 1909 OF TOTAL an POPULATION numper Of a Popula- a oe 7 : a Value Value | wage earn- Lan rea| tion per | of Indus- umber age Harn- added by added by | ers to total DIVISION AND STATE Population) (square | sq. mile | triesre-| of Estab- iers (average Value | mManuiac- Py 7 te | Manu= | population” 1910 miles) 1910)" 1910 ported | lishments | number) | of Products | ire _-- =| facture |(Per Cent.) United States ~----_ =~ 7 o- 94,972,266| 2,973,690 30.9 264 268,491| 6,615,046 $20,672,051,870) $8,529.260,992' $295 ¢ 93 72 GEOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS: New England ~~~—-_--2_-- = 6,002,081 61,976 105.7 a 20,001 1,101,290! -2,670,065,114" 1,193.768,236 408 129 16.3 Middle Atlantic _____1_1111) 19,315,892 100,000 193.2 a 81,315| 2,207,747, _7,141,761,302| 2,982,.263,578| 370 154 114 ast North Central__~________ 16,250,621 245,064 143 a 60,018 1,513,764) 5,211,702,164, 2.177,230,169 286 119 25 West North Central.) /))7 11,637,921 510,804 22.8 a 27,171 374,387| 1,803,898,550| 562.043.447| «155 43 29 South Atlantic /1_//11_1))_1) 12,194,895 269,071 45.3 a 28,088 663,015) 1,381,186,210, 591,181,848 113 AS 5 4 East South Central_.__/_____ 8,409,901 179,509 46.8 a 15,381 261,772, 630,488,093) 294,324,342 a5 35 a4 West South Central.) |) 77) 8,784,534 429,746 20.4 a 12,339 204,520, «625,443,045! 343. 311.949 71 28 23 Mountain 191-91 ~1_1_ 11) 2,683,517 $59,125 31 a 5,254 75,435| —«363,995,598! —-135,303.366 188 Bi 29 Pacific _-_ 1212220111 4,192,304 318,095 13.2 a 13,579 212,166 843,511,794, 349,882.562| «201 a3 51 NEW ENGLAND: | Maine (000000000 742.371 29,895 24.8 126 3,546 79,955) *:176,029,293 78,928,169, 237 106 10.3 New Hampshire ~ 0 2 ~~ 7l_7 430,512 9,031 AT. 104 1,961 13,008 164,531,019 66,424,003, 302 154 18.3 Vermont —20 007 30D, JD0 9124 39.0 4 1,996 30,108 63,509°824 55,401,096) 192 o4 95 Massachusetts ~_--_____ 3,000,416 8,009 418.8 223 11,634 DO4,509 1,490,929,006 659,764,443 S40 196 17.4 Rhode Island ___//_____)_ | 542,610 1,067, «4508.5 135 1,951 113,588) —«:280,843,797| 122,152,993) (517 295 20.9 Connecticut 11/11 1 1,114,756 4,820| 231.8 188 4251 210,792) ~—«-490,271,695| 283,012,302; «440 209 18,9 ee | AS 44.985! 1,003,981; 3,869,490,192' 1.512.585.8501. «370 166 11.0 - Yor : ‘614 47,654. «191.2 2 ‘935 008, 369,490,192) 1,512,585,850 ew ferseyitunsen ne 5587167 7,514 3387.7 231 $817 226,223) 1,145,529,076| 425,495,677| 451 168 12.5 Pennsyivania ~_________ 7 7,665,111 A4 332 171.0 245 21,000 $17,043) 2,626,742,054| 1,044,182.04G B40 136 14 EAST NORTH CENTRAL: a : : Ohio (2-0 4,767,121 A0,740| «2117.0 218 15,138 446,934) 1,437.935,617| 613,783,870| 302 129 G4 Indiana _l_1__._._-..__.___ 2,700,876 36,045 74.9 178 7,969 186,984) 579,075,046) _244,700,298| 214 91 6.9 Wiinois — 122202 | 5,638,591 56,043 100.6 234 18,026 465,764, 1,919,276,594| -'758,349,904' «3.40 i134 8.3 Michigan 11/))_)0)1)1) 202 | 2,810,178 57,480 48.9 200 9,159 231,499| | 685,109,169) 316,497,147| 244 113 3.2 Wisconsin ____._..-1_..-_.- | 2,333,860 55,256 42.2 190 9,721 182,588| 590,305,538) 248.948.9552 105 7.8 TRAL: | WEST NORTH CEN | 7 054 152 5 5e1 84.767, 409,419,621| 127,797,334) «197 62 At Minnesota 2112 loool : 2,070,108 50,596 D. ; ; | i lowa 0 2294771 55,586 40.0 133 5,528 61,635, - 259,287,637 88,530,589) 117 Ap 2.8 Missouri 11202202222 2222222 8,293,335 68,727 47.9 195 88751 152,993| 574,111,070) 219,699,919] 174 67 46 ; 7 Os 8.2 36 752 2,739 19,137,506 5,463,916 33 9 0.5 North Dakota ~~ (7 ~~ _ 7 l- 311,006 10,1835 ; 7 7 7 7 ne South Dakota |)1)111)1110)- 583,888 76,868 7.6 AG 1,020 3,602 17,870,135 6,393,7 i iH OG Nebraska ~~ )~ 00177 1,192,214 16,3508 15.5 105 2,000 24,5006 99,018,919 AT,937,608 167 ; Kansas _.._______..1..___.1)” 1,690,949 81,774 20.7 104 3,430 44,215 320,104,002 66,220,296 192 39 2.0 | | | re | De 83 726 21,9388 52,339,619 21,901,318} 261 108 105 Delaware es | Z0Z,022 1,965 1038.0 ; ? 7 7 ; : Maryland 111/00) | 1,295,346 9,941 130.3 170 4,837 107,921) 815,669,150) 116,620,245) 244 20 3 District 01 Columbia ___ ~~ a 901,009 60) (5,017.8 714 als 1101 so von eee aod | _ 7 i Virginia ~~ o_o 2,061,612 40}262 51.2 130 3,000 105,676 Tai aaolee 9 nn aos 7 7 a iis) 240) B08) Gees] ahees) Meneses) Goo) Be North Carolina ~- > ~~ ~~ 1 2,206,231 43,74 Dae J ; (090,009 98,1 98,00 J 7 ; South Caroling -2-—2- beisa00) aaaa) doi] ae ee eo ell ke i 2,609,121 sia rs ;§vu ; 5 7 gat ea PyOUO,aVIC 7 . Florida re 752,619 54.861 13.7 56 2,159 5TAT3 72,889,659 46,761,380 oT | 62 7.6 ee ee re 7 | 138 4,776 65,400| 228,754,497! 111,975,180) 08 49 2.9 Kentucky _~ oe 2,209,000: 40,1351 o1.U ; ; 7 3 A ee 118 4,609 73,840| 180,216,548; 76,200,714! 5 3 3. Tennessee ©. 2101122 222 2,104,100: 41,087 Da. ; ; ee 695191901 Ea 29 a4 Alabama ____11____ ee 2,138,093: 51,279 41.7 a3 3,398 72,148 105,261,638 62,519,130 a : 4 Mississippi ~~ 00070 le 1,797,114 46,562 Bo.0 49 2,000 50,554 $0,090,416 5629, | WEST SOUTH CENTRAL: | | 7 | 7 ee 1,574,449: 52,525 30.0 72 2,925 44,982, 74,916,861 39,981,455 43 26 2.9 Arkansas [100 - ~~ lL ; | ; | A AG 2.516 76,165) 223,948,688| 39,083,863, «185 | ; Louisiana .11_.-___________. 1,656,388: 45,409 36.5 106 oo O90 5 22 12 0.8 Oklahoma 2.2.l0000 1,657,155: 69,414 23.9 73 2.310 13,143 58,682,405, 19,529,511 2 7 og Texas ....._._......_.._.__| $,896,542| «262,898 148 120 4.588 70,230) —«- 272,895,685; «94,717,120 | 2 . | | i | | MOUNTAIN: | ae 4,091,554) 195 | 64 3.1 rs een 5o4| asasd| 8 a8 top| sea0|-eae9neco| iearaeas| 69 |S 25 Idano [ool ; } ; : ae : As oF : Wvomiat o=noneomeannanans qos! wanesel ai] tet osa| anor] tao osemo| 4eneaan tes | 6 [ do 200 ; , : 7 7 : ; A 23 oA | : New Mexies -1.-0ccscsssa.- s27,801) 122.503, 2.7 28 B18 414s) 1807756) oa | gels eriZOta — 22222225 =2-2-= ausee| | apiaA 7 7 _ oe 61.980.277| 20,728,616 166 | BG 3.2 re 510,001 > : ? : a ; : 43 2 ee ee 81.8751 109,821 0.7 a7 177 2,257 11,336,823 3,020,089 19 | | ee | | | 102,858,788, «+193 90 6.1 Washington 22222.-2---—-- byes! geen] Fel tid] «ss Bane| Saya] 9s00dea5| 404528751 188 eas California 2----.----------| 2e7rrs4s| 166,652 16.8 185 7,659 115,296) 529,760,528) 204,522,454) 228 Net Railway Operating Income—Pocahontas Roads Showing Rate of Return on Investment—Four Months Ended December 31, 1920 Rich., Fred. & ‘Total Ch K Norfolk ’ a Item & Ohio 7 & We 7 a a pathy Virginian ee Net Railway Operating Income: September, 1920.-..-.....-.. ee $2,300,001 $1,394,004 def. $4,741 $OO0, 147 | $4,646,527 October, re ne 2.5/2,000 1,474,131 158,912 664.615 4.869.658 November, —s—««.-.........-- ae 1,213,008 1,414,791 30,000 603,905 3,200,000 December, —- (partially est.)..--..- 1,075,003 — 1,341,280 dei. 31,000 404,000 2,409,200 Total—Four Months --:-..--- ee 1,229,900 $5,624,766 176,209 $2,000,001 $10,092,020 Property Investment—October 31, 1919... $297,003,227 $09,109,147 $22,110,400 >10G6,160,151 $/730,/01,530 Rate of Return on Investment (Annual basis)..--..... re 7.30 5.45 2.35 1.23 6.36 NOTE—“‘ Net Railway Operating Income ”’ does not take into account lap-over items growing out of settlements with the U. S. Railroad Administration. Data for the month of December, 1920, not being available from the files of the Interstate Commerce Commission, it was secured from the respective carriers as estimated by them. January 24, 1921: Vrl ON 4K s SSM A OM W.H. Williams Exhibit No. 145 BUREAU OF RAILWAY ECONOMICS 429 HOMER BUILDING THIRTEENTH AND F STREETS, N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. JULIUS H. PARMELEE, Director R. J. LEIMER, Statistician RICHARD H. JOHNSTON, Librarian E, K. KLOMAN, Chief Clerk January 18, 1921. Dear Mr. Williams: In compliance with the request which you made over the long distance telephone yesterday, I have prepared a statement, two copies of which are enclosed herewith, showing the net operating income of the New England railways and of other railways in the Eastern Rate Case District for the months of September, October, and November, and for the three months to November 30th, compared with 6 per cent on the tentative valuation of their properties. The statement is based on statistics which are in part frankly estimated. In estimating the valuation of the New England roads, as compared with the other railways in the district, we have used the ratio which the property investment accounts of the New Engiand roads bore to the invest- ment accounts of all eastern roads in the tabulations compiled for the recent rate case. In figuring what proportion of an annual 6 per cent on that valuation should be apportioned to each month, we have used the same ratio for the New England roads as for the Eastern District as a whole, although I think it likely that if the proportion could be worked out for the New England roads separately the several months would show variations from the average for the whole district. However, I feel that the statement does not depart very far from an exact presentation of the facts. Your request extends to the month of December, in view of the fact that I had made a gen- eral estimate for that month. My estimate had to do with the railroads of the entire country, but when it came to distributing the returns among the several districts, I have felt that there were so many elements of uncertainty that I hesitate to make even a guess for December. The enclosed statement, therefore, stops with November 30th. Very truly yours, JULIUS H. PARMELEE, Director. Mr. W. H. Williams, D and H Co. New York, N. Y. NET OPERATING INCOME COMPARED WITH SIX PER CENT ON VALUATION Class I Roads—Eastern Rate Case District showing New England District. Period and Item Month of September, 1920: Six per cent on valuation Net operating income_____________________ Shortage under 6%____________________ Rate Earned (Annual Basis) Month of October, 1920: Six per cent on valuation___._..__.-______- Net operating income________.____________ Shortage under 6%_____-__-__-__-_-_--- Rate Earned (Annual Basis) _______-_-__-- Month of November, 1920: Six per cent on valuation_____-__---------- Net operating income_______-_------------ Shortage under 6%_____--------------- Rate Earned (Annual Basis) _--__---------- Three Months Ended November 30, 1920: Six per centan valigtiOn ae Net operating income. __--_--------------- Shortage under 6%-------------------- Rate Earned (Annual Basis) -------------- New England Roads $4,953,000 973,450 3,979,550 1.2 4,777,000 54,944 4,722,056 0.07 4,066,000 def 1,487,799 5,553,799 def 13,796,000 def 459,405 14,255,405 def Other Eastern District Roads $46,534,000 31,187,299 15,346,701 4.0 44,882,000 37,115,039 7,766,961 5.0 38,197,000 25,066,855 13,180,145 3.9 129,613,000 93,369,193 36,243,807 4.3 Total Eastern District $51,487,000 32,160,749 19,326,251 3.7 49,659,000 37,169,983 12,489,017 4.5 42,263,000 23,579,056 18,683,944 3.3 143,409,000 92,909,788 50,499,212 3.9 Note: Foregoing returns do not take into account lap-over items growing out of settle- ments with the U. S. Railroad Administration. Data shown for “Other Eastern District Roads” for November is partially estimated. Data for “New England Roads” covers the following carriers: Boston and Albany Bangor and Aroostook Boston and Maine Canadian Pacific Lines in Maine Central New England January 18, 1921. Central Vermont Grand Trunk Lines in N. E. Maine Central New York, New Haven and Hartford Rutland R. R. STATEMENT. (a) Showing 6% Return upon Book Property Investment Account. W. H. Williams Exhibit No.146 (b) Comparison of Estimate of Net Railway Operating Income on basis of Data in Ex Parte 74, with Estimate on basis of Data submitted in I. C, C. Docket 11756. (c) Estimate by New England Lines of the Increased Income for each of the Seven Roads should the Divisions be Changed as Requested in their Prayer for Relief. () 6% Return (2) Est. Net Ry. Opr. Income 7 N. E. (3) Hst. Net Ry. Opr. (4) “Net” Fixed (5) Est. Amt. by which Roads _ will (6) Alleged Deficiency each Line DO Revenue from Road 7 N. EL Lines Lines based on Income 7 N. E. Charges to be Fail to meet Fixed Account N. EB. Proposed (Brigham Ex. 6 Yr. ended Oct. Lines based on met out of Opr. charges based Lines being in- Arbitraries Sheet 2, Col. 5) 31, ’°19 (Brigham year ended Income on year ended cluded in Eastern (Data given Mr. ix. 6; sheet 2 6/30/20 (Brigham Ex. 3) 6/30/20 Rate Group Williams b Col. 5 — Col. 9) (Brigham Ex. 1) (Brigham Bx. 3) Col. 1 less Col. 3 Mr. Choate Bangor & Aroostook ............. $ 1,878,816} $ 792,813) $ 1,219,575) $ 1,002,400} $ Excess 217,175] $ —-:1,086,003 |$ 307,000 Boston & Maine ...............45 14,430,288 11,922,844 2,663,491 6,111,000 3,447,509 2,507,444 8,351,000 Central New England ............. 1,718,961 40,904 D_ 812,407 754,845 1,567,252 1,678,057 1,970,000 Central Vermont ................. 1,339,657 D 590,727 D 460,000 883,000 1,343,000 1,930,384 1,095,000 Maine Central ................... 3,833,878 1,381,389 D 122,911 2,052,447 2,175,358 2,452,489 1,423,000 New York, New Haven & Hartford. 22,701,770 8,754,840 5,757,923 16,381,378 10,623,455 13,946,930 9,824,000 Rutland’ so sscacscccaeteeeeicsee 1,502,786 690,292 450,995 428,054) Excess 22,941 812,494 548,000 (Seven) New England Lines....... $ 47,406,156} $ 22,992,355) $ 8,696,666) $ 27,613,124) $ 18,916,458 $ 24,4138,701)}$ 23,518,000 Boston & Albany ................. 4,631,791 4,580,732 51,159 (1) Total, including Boston & Albany..}$ — 52,037,947/$ 27,573,087 $ 24,464,860 (1) No estimate has been made; whatever revenue resulted would increase the total. Revenue Needs of New England Roads 1. As estimated on basis of original request to I. C. C 2. As estimated with Revenues and Expenses b rought up to date to include Wage Award, Rate Decision, etc. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 146 Bangor & Boston & Boston & Central Central Maine New Rutland N ITEM Aroostook Albany Maine New England Vermont Central Haven : Coa (Note A) Property Investment as of Oct. 31, 1919............ $30,868,420 $77,196,523 $240,504,801 $28,649,354 $22,327,616 $72,301,917 $418,576,228 $25,046,433 $915,471,292 6% Return on Property Investment................- 1,852,105 4,631,791 14,430,288 1,718,961 1,339,656 4,338,115 25,114,574 1,502,786 54,928,276 Adjusted Net Railway Operating Net Income : as reported by Roads on Questionnaire.......... Cr. 22,328 Cr. 1,493,991 Cr. 2,103,798 D. 1,218,542 D. 1,540,773 D. 901,544 D. 1,472,205 Cr. 55,914 D. 1,457,033 4 Prorate of bulk adjustments made by Account- ing Committee... n-ne een Dr. 384,766 Dr. 1,211,050 Dr. 3,635,819 Dr. 518,266 Dr. 360,467 Dr. 1,014,280 Dr. 1,933,316 Dr. 110,655 Dr. 9,163,619 5 Revised Net Railway Operating Income at time Case was presented.............----------------------+ D. 362,488 Cr. 282,941 D. 1,532,021 D. 1,781,808 D. 1,901,240 D. 1,915,824 D. 3,405,521 D. 54,741 D. 10,620,652 6 Additional Net Railway Operating Income required to yield 6%.......--.--------------2--eeeeoe 2,214,543 4,348,850 15,962,309 3,450,769 3,240,896 6,253,939 28,520,095 1,557,527 65,548,920 7 30% Increase in Freight Rates....:......--------- 1,174,762 4,296,866 13,487,498 1,799,128 15442,950 3,463,778 14,192,925 747,698 40,605,608 Balance Needed above 30% increase to yield 6% 1,039,781 51,984 2,474,811 1,651,641 1,797,946 2,790,161 14,327,170 809,834 24,943,328 9 Revised Net Railway Operating Income at time Case was presented (See No. 5)...........--- D. 862,488 Cr. 282,941 D. 1,582,021 D. 1,781,808 D. 1,901,240 D. 1,915,824 D. 3,405,521 D. 54,741 D. 10,620,652 10 Effect of Award of Labor Board..................-------- 600,000 3,000,000 10,700,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,326,885 14,000,000 700,000 33,326,885 11 Additonal increases in expenses (coal, ma- 5 terials, etc.) developed since Case was sub- mitted in April 128,032 514,038 3,914,339 219,550 760,122 1,515,000 8,240,125 145,783 10,436,989 12, Net Railway Operating Income Revised to August 1 on Basis of Present Rates... D. 1,090,470 D. 3,231,097 D. 16,146,360 D. 2,951,358 D. 3,661,362 D. 5,757,709 D. 20,645,646 D. 900,524 D. 54,384,526 13 Estimated Increases in Revenue Resulting from Decision of I. C. C_..u....-.------------e---oe-eeeee-= 1,759,952 7,891,241 23,182,805 2,490,310 2,086,501 5,722,486 29,022,300 1,413,745 73,569,340 14 Estimated Net Railway Operating Income under new rates... ene cneeeeceeeneeeceeeeeeceeeeee 669,482 4,660,144 7,036,445 D. 461,048 D. 1,574,861 D. 35,223 8,376,654 513,221 19,184,814 15 Additional income now needed to yield 6% (Excess) on Property Investment..........-...-.------------------- 1,182,623 28,353 7,393,843 2,180,009 2,914,517 4,373,338 16,737,920 989,565 35,743,462 D—Indicates deficit. Note A—New Haven’s property investment includes $40,218,406 representing interest in New York Terminals owned by New York Central. If this were ar papa or sum of Deena would be transferred from fixed charges to joint facility rentals, increasing New Haven’s net railway operating eficit by that amount. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 147 STATEMENT SHOWING THE OPERATING STATISTICS OF THE RAILROADS IN THE NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT, FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 3lst, 1918 PREPARED FROM THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORT, “A PRELIMINARY ABSTRACT OF STATISTICS OF COMMON CARRIERS Total Boston Central Central Boston Bangor New York, Maine New England Rutland and and New Haven ew Englan and Maine Vermont New England ites ‘ncaa & Hartford Central RAILWAY OPERATING REVENUES: Freight ~_.------------------------------- 134,265,889 43,085,382 2,623,260 3,799,680 5,494,741 14,057,670 3,795,890 50,721,288 10,687,978 Passenger ____-~-------------------------- 74,211,347 19,039,025 1,167,127 847,284 296,947 8,321,353 813,036 39,379,917 4346,658 Excess baggage ~.------------------------- 282,943 54,017 9,114 6,335 1,336 34,697 5,410 137,136 34.898 a A OE ee ee Pies 9 eee fee 8 See Oe et eae oR eee Fe GE Be CRE 5 ic 2 i wenennes a ee ee er Mail ------------------------------------ 2,452,099 704,076 71,569 54,715 28,166 431,681 44,831 872,101 244,960 Express —~-.--.--.----------------------- 9,365,600 2,615,678 124,885 126,496 41,000 1,018,372 83,461 4,916,961 438,747 Other passenger train__-_~----------------- 712,745 172,695 10,040 6,556 992 99,758 994 394,679 27.031 Milk ~~---------------------------------- 2,219,839 1,057,617 411,901 120,752 92,353 OR tS kc 295,821 185,198 Switehing ——..... .-----.--+----+-~+=+---- 1,961,735 755,915 44,282 51,367 33,822 307,679 10,874 728,257 29.539 All other rail-line revenue._._...._-..------- 187,573 86,280 3,386 1,312 2,877 5,293 1,934 712,025 14,466 Total rail-line transportation revenue__-_-_-- 225,666,394 67,570,685 4,465,564 5,021,121 5,992,234 24,332,700 4,756,430 97,518,185 16,009,475 Total water-line transportation revenue____-_-- 55,892 RS Sea ee ees Me eer ke cre Pe 45,627 Total incidental operating revenue_--~------- 8,224,837 2,330,660 77,438 167,691 70,807 1,135,535 106,793 3,975,837 360,076 S00 TMG See dS eee 889,748 ee re 115 a ee eee ee se. TOR ES snc hed wk ee 1,129 606 Stk ee ee ee mete to ea ee ee Total railway operating revenues___----~-- 234,828,642 69,911,398 4,540,589 5,188,812 6,063,156 25,552,079 4,868,223 102,294,212 16,415,178 RAILWAY OPERATING EXPENSES: Total maintenance of way and structures____- 32,514,419 10,018,497 174,427 819,180 1,167,346 2,676,234 791,357 13,525,533 2.741,845 Total maintenance of equipment__-_---------- 47,522,270 14,175,174 1,073,537 1,323,477 1,062,351 4,192,879 1,162,521 20,918,413 3,618,918 Total traffic ......___---._----------------- 1,606,119 480,809 120,475 89,611 20,617 236,935 45,925 475,232 136,515 Total transportation—rail-line ~------------ 118,578,180 37,490,058 2,292,467, 3,187,155 2,998,794 13,535,472 2,038,997, 48,020,080 9,015,157 Total transportation—water line __-_--------- 87,025 ee ee a ae ee ee eee Fee ee eee 712,753 Total miscellaneous operations ~_-__--------- 2,830,648 436,924 3,080 12,099 24,617 513,910 54,431 1,737,691 47,896 Total general expenses _-------~----------- 6,474,263 1,827,512 123,512 157,638 128,475 610,426 147,064 3,087,451 397:185 Transportation for investment—Cr.___.------ 28,437 12,474 317 621 ee 2 eee 778 12,877 523 Total railway operating expenses__-~-~~~- 209,584,487 64,430,772 4,887,181 5,588,539 5,396,353 21,765,856 4,239,517 87,746,523 16,029,746 Operating ratio (ratio of oper. exp. to. oper. rev.) per cent.___..._...-=---+-.-.--.--= 89.25 92.16 96.62 107.70 89.00 85.18 87.17 85.78 97.65 ROAD OPERATED AT CLOSE OF YEAR: Ss a ae a 7,620.81 2,258.61 415.11 411.20 301.30 393.93 632.35 1,992.15 1,216.16 Miles of second main track... _.....- 1,821.55 ae See 6.20 4.04 218.84 30.29 811.11 83.62 Mies ef tiird main track. ....-....-+._.~.. 217.79 ae eee eee eee ae ee 126.11 1.30 Ses Of fourth main track... ==... -.. 143.61 ee ae See eee oe See 115.49 1.30 Miles of all other main tracks_______.------- OO ae eee | eee eee OO eee eee ee Miles of yard track and sidings, etc._____-_-- 4,431.44 1,376.93 132.79 160.01 161.69 419.05 219.33 1577.35 384.29 Total miles of road operated (all tracks) __- 14,255.64 4,233.59 547.90 577.41 542.70 1,142.75 881.97 4,642.65 1,686.67 FREIGHT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT (TONNAGE ORIGINATING ON ROAD): Total products of agriculture _.___-_-------- 3,240,385 513,408. 93,705 66,726 16,590 1,323,028 381,223 576,799 268,911 Total -produets GF animal... <1... 2,176,796 734,573 29,497 32,183 4,707 914,417 4,956 405,963 50,500 Total prodn@is of Wiwee... =... =. 9,696,692 878,007 235,006 313,538 26,056 4,882,524 187,836 3,049,864 123,861 Total products of forests _______.---------- 5,392,172 1,985,107 160,841 108,461 45,676 505,757 639,895 405,165 1,541,270 Talel wiamulactires: oo oo. Sec ok 11,126,487 2,269,896 99,158 293,464 69,205 4,215,321 275,093 2,597,781 1,306,569 Miscellaneous commodities (carload rates) -_-- 4,645,876 ee | 23,026 46,619 784,490 38,967 1,911,359 72,310 L. C. L. goods not distributed above_____------ 4,042,218 1,080,085 58,230 185,272 oe ee 29,950 2,106,470 525,837 Grand total all commodities____----------- 40,320,626 9,230,126 676,437 1,022,670 265,277 12,625,537 1,557,920 11,053,401 3,889,258 STATISTICS OF RAIL-LINE OPERATIONS: Train Miles: | Prem ronry So se 24,072,927 8,206,625 654,589 746,538 972,652 3,736,267 761,486 6,467,095 2,527,675 eee ONY 506,095 77,015 8,400 31,127 See eae 9,254 274,502 45,973 ee ee ee eee 31,693,326 9,384,429 1,094,049 760,600 424,929 3,614,145 562,507 13,657,284 2,195,383 Mixed _--~----------------------------- 830,431 202,238 21,354 70,440 37,311 45,796 156,348 123,784 173,160 Special... s--2 ee ss 56,171 40,025 1,037 102 913 1,315 541 4,856 7,382 Total transportation service__________--- 57,158,950 17,910,332 1,779,429 1,608,807 1,495,629 7,397,523 1,490,136 20,527,521 4,949,573 Work service -_------------------------- 2,903,685 689,840 26,148 | 25,330 117,967 178,759 62,981 1,650,148 152,512 Locomotive Miles: Freight—principal ---------------------- 25,422,264 8,285,408 667,878 777,665 | 1,082,494 4,482,384 820,008 6,743,405 2,613,027 Freight—helper -~---------------------- 1,864,324 1,084,163 92,632 19,246 a 6,673 540,162 33'078 Freight—light -_------------------------ 1,520,611 796,054 50,495 20,598 ae ee. 16,036 499,473 61349 Total freight ------------------------- 28,807,199 10,165,625 811,000 817,509 | 1,197,470 4,482,384 842,717 7,783,040 | 2,707,454 __ Passenger—principal —------------------- 31,024,681 9,384,429 | 1,095,888 760,600 424,929 4,251,602 545,252 12,348,149 | 2,213,837 Passenger—helper ---------------------- 1,525,348 119,492 55,147 454 ian ee 2,780 1343,606 2°65 Passenger—light —_---------------------- 1,209,386 348,613 8,740 13,110 Beeb eee 5,461 785,906 41.703 Total passenger -----~----------------- 33,759,415 9,852,534 1,159,770 774,164 432,026 4,251,602 558,493 14,477,661 | 2,958,165 Total mixed train__---------------------- 884,420 208,605 22,864 70,440 37,818 47,229 181,033 126,186 | 194.245 Tova speelnl _.... 222s. 5-- asses es 62,344 43,488 1,037 102 1,068 1,348 900 5,715 8,686 Train switching -_----------------------- 2,838,540 652,057 74,375 226,252 See 193,167 1,165,884 | 462,116 ERE ETE ES SS — SESOLIA VO IP OR SLY, OOS I NS IE ne ee ee SEgUhVyd tf 6 het JE FOE PUY UVUY PS PG eS | 6 eee a. em a VM a9 AV Od, xO Yard switching—passenger __.__._______--- 1,673,828 734,530 15,240 26,145 Gier ee 3,892 818,716 67,518 Total transportation service______------- 83,445,827 26,578,816 2,379,040 2,311,451 2,118,885 11,545,303 2,028,049 29,895,665 6,593,618 Worl seviee 6 ee 3,437,991 800,267 45,662 56,934 120,793 297,557 80,441 1,800,312 236,005 Car Miles: Freight train—loaded —.. 461,083,992 158,780,339 | 12,228,970 14,265,549 | 17,453,314 67,823,660 | 12,214,669 137,152,419 41,164,572 Freight train—empty —_.-..-..----.--_-- 192,078,909 61,808,932 3,958,441 5,741,163 13,416,280 32,647,942 8,179,330 43,912,157 22,419,664 Freight train—caboose ____.------------- 24,797,373 8,396,437 638,176 781,408 1,045,421 3,840,216 715,588 6,809,354 2,570,773 Sal trees train... 677,960,274 228,985,708 - | 16,820,587 20,788,120 | 31,915,515 104,311,818 | 21,109,587 187,873,930 66,155,009 Passenger train—passenger _____-____---- 98,735,862 31,187,607 2,340,556 1,564,374 896,451 10,300,018 1,268,484 45,749,389 5,428,988 Passenger train—sleeping, parlor and obser- (a 26,010,881 4,008,465 1,001,507 448,348 186 5,475,257 105,387 13,161,105 1,810,626 Passenger train—dining _.___.______-----~- 2,178,738 91,308 14,058 14,038 215 665,699 25,671 1,296,904 70,845 Passenger train—other ___________----_-_- 49,861,136 15,271,932 3,923,130 1,889,606 659,878 5,859,295 798,039 17,221,136 4,288,120 Ota: Ganneneer train... 176,786,617 50,559,312 7,279,251) 3,916,366 1,556,730 22,300,264 . 2,197,581 17,428,584 11,548,579 Mixed train—freight—loaded ______-__--- 3,745,186 983,627 81,204 457,863 — 97,555 26,181 750,082 533,420 815,254 Mixed train—freight—empty ~_-_-_--_---~- 2,020,266 349,929 27,517 216,482 ae 785,707 168,260 450,007 Mixed train—caboose —....=-.--_ 112,804 ee ee eS ee 65 1,315 34,535 17,764 58,700 Mixed train—passenger _........_.....-_- 1,062,267 274,271 23,220 70,748 a 213,444 178,389 265,561 Mixed train—sleeping, parlor and observa- RUG stereos ie See EE SE 10,250 SS aE Ee 65 Sp Se Rc ee aries ae 8 ft 8... a ee eee 133 2,240 Mixed train—other passenger-train________ 188,315 Mie so 296 Se. 47,027 47,563 14,867 OE A ER oe eke ses 7,141,471 1,650,761 131,941 745,339 196,409 27,496 1,830,795 952,101 1,606,629 Total apes TEA on se 433,644 216,827 17,364 690 eS. 7,132 96,350 75.148 Total transportation service___________~- 862,322,006 281,412,608 | 24,249,143 25,450,515 | 33,688,787 126,639,578 | 25,145,095 266,350,915 79,385,365 DOT I os ieee 10,590,405 1,190,022 238,107 135,057 476,110 405,111 518,485 7,357,605 269,908 Miscellaneous: 7One-—Tevente Trent _ 8 nk ns 100,127,102 30,109,986 2,761,758 4,378,352 7,651,087 12,625,537 2,127,615 31,959,107 8,513,660 Tons—non-revenue freight -_____________- 8,234,549 2,552,760 153,484 176,865 296,343 946,410 172,966 3,147,253 788,468 Ton miles—revenue freight _.___._.__.._- 10,356,966,699 3,612,614,982 290,861,091 275,913,433 (588,961,151 1,554,685,324 (265,836,285 |2,938,401,629 | 879,692,804 Ton miles—non-revenue freight __________ 508,942,944 175,487,709 14,215,723 5,858,506 8,296,296 74,926,212 16,861,825 155,221,021 58,075,652 Passengers carried—revenue _._.._______- 153,836,515 44,660,430 1,218,033 1,041,032 741,378 12,797,886 575,965 89,134,878 3,666,913 Passenger miles—revenue —....._....--..- 3,350,555,217 882,382,133 42,000,274 29,662,265 12,518,573 375,242,431 24,240,790 1,831,115,817 153,392,934 Ton miles revenue freight per mile of road__ 1,358,914 1,599,486 700,684 670,996 1,788,786 3,946,202 420,394 1,475,057 723,075 Ton miles revenue freight per train-mile____ 407.60 425.72 425.02 325.33 503.80 411.07 286.74 428.00 320.26 Ton miles revenue freight per loaded car-mile 22.28 22.61 23.68 18.74 30.71 22.92 20.50 21.34 20.96 Passenger miles revenue per train-mile_____ 103.01 92.04 37.65 35.69 27.08 102.53 33.72 132.87 64.76 Passenger miles revenue per car-mile_______ 26.63 24.87 12.48 14.23 13.41 16.79 15.27 30.99 20.44 Miles hauled revenue freight______________ 103.44 119.98 105.32 63.02 70.44 123.14 124.95 91.94 103.33 Miles carried revenue passengers __________ 21.78 19.76 34.48 28.49 16.89 29.32 42.09 20.54 41.83 Revenue per ton of freight________________ $1.34090 $1.43093 $0.94985 $0.86751 $0.71816 $1.11300 $1.78410 $1.59003 $1.25589 Revenue per ton mile of freight____________ $0.01300 $0.01193 $0.00902 $0.01377 $0.01020 $0.00904 $0.01428 $0.01729 $0.01215 Revenue per passenger ....._-...-_-...... 0.48240 $0.42631 $0.95821 $0.81388 $0.40053 $0.65020 $1.41161 $0.44189 $1.18537 Revenue per passenger-mile ______________ $0.02210 $0.02158 $0.02779 $0.02586 $0.02372 $0.02218 $0.03354 $0.02151 $0.02834 EQUIPMENT (OWNED OR LEASED) IN SERVICE AT CLOSE OF YEAR: Steam locomotives—number available for serv- : WR ci dag cide ate aagtammana ie 2,915 1,333 97 104 78 - 89 1,196 238 Steam locomotives—total tractive capacity CS ce es a 81,019,675 29,183,800 2,921,100 2,754,800 2,468,575 - 2,184,300 34,527,600 6,969,500 Other locomotives—number available for serv- WR ae ena ee 110 (es ee ee ee eee Die Se wahintielas RO re aa Ok Chee 8 Sc a 49,303 12,587 1,572 2,030 992 ” 2,588 24,559 4,980 Put es-S6e ...... 6,222 769 196 531 50 y 2,009 1,477 860 wegen OATS HUM? 5 5 kk 845 96 68 SS ae ee . as. Ss gee 566 Cet Cage sc 5 ee 18,610 7,210 578 205 21 ge Re eg 9,186 1,410 Sa i ne ee a ee ee a ee a eee ee ee aug ea Spee ae ee gees Refrigerator cars—number _....__........... 645 304 54 eS eae FS Fat ii aii aa 249 24. Other freight carrying cars—number_________ 1,008 Me) Aire Se eS ee Be Ie fale tO pee 828 All freight carrying cars—number_______- 76,633 21,146 2,468 2,788 1,063 - 5,029 35,471 8,668 Total passenger carrying cars—number ______ 3,682 1,318 66 68 36 * 62 1,916 216 Other passenger train cars—number _________ 1,336 483 62 Al 21 * 24 611 94 Total number of passenger train cars_______ 5,018 1,801 128 109 57 * 86 2,527 310 * Figures not available included in figures of the New York Central which leases the Boston & Albany. W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 148 Statement Showing the Operating Statistics of the Railroads in the Eastern District, New England District, Eastern District Excluding the New England District; the Pocahontas Group and Total Eastern District Excluding the New England District and Including the Pocahontas Group, for the Year Ending December 31, 191S— Prepared from the Interstate Commerce Commission Report, ‘A Preliminary Abstract of Statistics of Common Camrierss” ) 065500 eee ni fi W 0 OW Total Eastern Dis- trict excluding the New England Dis- trict and including 2 the Pocahontas Total Eastern Dis- Group, classified as trict excluding the Southern District Eastern New England New England Pocahontas Roads in I. C. C. District District District Group Report RAILWAY OPERATING REVENUES: a ee 1,549,592,398 134,265,889 1,415,326,509 139,000,265 1,554,326,774 SEE EERIE PEE RIEL AO 444,718,356 74,211,347 370,507,009 30,381,942 400,888,951 nn cee 2,015,079 282,943 1,732,136 130,314 1,862,450 RE OE og iis nee aommmpennwend io) eaten” FR eee eee eee a eer A RT CE i ie no ence 242,534 6,624 235,910 73,244 309,154 a re 20,544,224 2,452,099 18,092,125 1,089,307 19,181,432 SN oe da resid cui gaeiaehd 61,631,380 9,365,600 52,265,780 2,477,882 54,743,662. COERae OT UI in scsi nee em nie es 2,703,509 712,745 1,990,764 175,427 2,166,191 a 14,585,253 2,219,839 12,365,414 54,740 12,420,154 aha dee emma 23,252,971 1,961,735 21,291,286 743,856 22,035,092 All other rail-line revenue_______.._________- 7,175,297 187,573 6,987,724 432,623 7,420,347 Total rail-line transportation revenue______- 2,126,461,001 225,666,394 1,900,794,607 174,559,600 2,075,354,207 Total water-line transportation revenue____-_-_- 5,283,929 55,392 Bane ee ee 5,228,537 Total incidental operating revenue________-_- 67,745,636 8,224,837 59,520,799 4,139,393 63,660,192 ee Te ig ciate tien aca nmed 3,134,303 _ 889,748 2,244,555 142,588 2,387,093 FO Te. oti a nongncrmnweccien | 908,732) % 7,729 901,008 18,849 919,852 Total railway operating revenues_____----_- 2,201,716,137 234,828,642 1,966,887,495 178,822,682 2,145,710,177 RAILWAY OPERATING EXPENSES: ee ee Total maintenance of way and structures____- 283,038,839 32,514,419 250,524,420 21,399,009 271,923,429 Total maintenance of equipment_________---- 531,810,501 47,522,270 484,288,231 41,341,858 525,630,089 i cl 20,777,136 1,606,119 19,171,017 1,162,216 20,333,233 Total transportation—rail-line ~_.._-------- 977,531,536 118,578,180 858,953,356 63,449,700 922,403,056 Total transportation—water line ______------ 3,369,819 87,025 A a rr es 3,282,794 Total miscellaneous operations ___.__-_-------- 18,790,345 2,830,648 15,959,697 797,122 16,756,819 Total general expenses ~__.---------------- 49,290,850 6,474,263 42,816,587 2,867,113 45,683,700 Transportation for investment—Cr.____------ 767,193 28,437 738, 756 179,963 918,719 Grand total railway operating expenses____- 1,883,841,833 209,584,487 1,674,257,346 130,837,055 | 1,805,094,401 _ Operating ratio (ratio of oper. exp. to oper. ze TOV.) 2 SOR ne nin ig et eee sne 85.56 89.25 85.12 73.17 84,12 ROAD OPERATED AT CLOSE OF YEAR: ee eee i a eee 58,622.68 7,620.81 51,001.87 5,216.30 56,218.17 Miles of second inaim track... onc cs 16,860.41 1,821.55 15,038.86 1,879.35 16,418.21 Wiles of third main track..2..3 2 2,500.33 217.79 2,282.54 8.04 2,290.58 Miles of fourth main track—...2222.<.....- 1,791.71 143.61 1,648.10 3.02 1,651.12 Miles of all other main tracks_________------ 46.44 20.44 aes 26.00 Miles of yard track and sidings, etc.____----- 41,704.45 4,431.44 37,273.01 2,896.75 40,169.76 Total miles of road operated (all tracks) —_- 121,526.02 14,255.64 107,270.38 9,503.46) = —«- 116,773.84 FREIGHT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT (TONNAGE ee a ee ee ORIGINATING ON ROAD): - Total products of agriculture ___._.----.---- 29,051,534 3,240,385 25,811,149 1,177,758 26,988,907 — Total products of ptimals _____-_-_2..-_— 11,653,936 2,176,796 9,477,140 267,303 9,744,443 eed BOGE OF SEE nan 379,307,905 9,696,692 369,611,213 60,281,425 429,892,638 Total products. of foretie:.) 25°33 | 93.3 | 93.3 | 15.3 | 22.2 | 297 | 307 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 52.5 | 51.3 | 35.8 | 40.7 | 65.8 | 65.8 125,382 (a) 412,715 (a) 538,097 510,989° | ot. 25,500 | 93.7 | 91.5 | 15.6 | 19.2 | 355 | 404 Poemhontait oes, cigceoses eso 56.1 | 54.2 | 48.2 | 50.8 | 59.6 | 60.5 23,551 30,628 42,748 60,403 66,299 OL08L || canenee 7473 | 91.9 | 93:7 | 34.4 | 23:1 | 910 | 554 SUPHEN, «ohn cnten once rawienys 46.5 | 46.4 | 31.9 | 33.2 | 69.5 | 71.1 44,506 (a) 246,384 (a) 290,890 296,586 118 so'oaa | 93.2 |-94.1 | 24:7 | 22'3 | 442 | 396 Northwestern... 0.0. ..0e0e020e 48.0 | 47.9 | 35.0 | 38.3 | 72.1 | 73.3 105,528 123,258 223,021 202,720 328,549 325,973 11,351 aves | 92.6 | 93.7 | 20.6 | 20.9 | 385 | 379 Central Western............0.005. 46.6 | 45.3 | 34.6 | 38.6 | 70.3 | 70.3 104,395 141,661 233,562 215,312 337,957 356,973 213 38104 | 94.0 | 94.3 | 23.6 | 24.5 | 420 | 423 Southwestern......0..2 0.00.0. 205 45.2 | 43.2 | 30.9 | 32.7 | 68.2 | 65.8 35,709 44,484 176,601 174,089 212,310 218,573 387 41'356 | 95.1 | 95.4 | 19:8 | 18.7 | 335 | 293 Total United States....... ..| 48.7 | 47.6 | 34.0 | 37.9 | 68.4 | 68.1 | 519,405 (a) 1,815,262 (a) 2,384,667 | 2,276,759 | (b) 12,083 | (6)210,300 | 93.5 | 93.0 | 19.5 | 21.1 | 379 | 392 Cost per Freight train-mile—Selected Accounts} Cost per | Cae 3 ose gen Aer ee of Coal Cost of Gallons of Oil Charged mile arged to Coal Account 394 or Gi f Locomotive Other Loco. & | Enginehouse ; Total Selected Selected Account 394 (d) Net tont ie eds een aes: RxcGion Repairs Enginemen Fuel Train Supplies Expenses Trainmen Accounts Accountst 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 New Bngland... 4... 40428 6s ¢.429 | $.392 | $.312 | $.252 | $.899 | $.705 | $.080 | $.073 | $.109 | $.113 | $.345 | $288 [$2,174 |$1.823 ]$1.380 |S1. 154 376,207 BOP O95 1ST BE | $5098 |e revcane | aaavasse | aaaene Paweece Great Lakes (6)... seco s.s2e04- ‘593 | 469 | 298} 265 | .634 | 553 | 1146] 111 | 154 | 119 | 345 | 284 | 2.170 | 1.801 | 1.041 | .975 | (b) 847,847 | (6) 8977435 [(b) 3.79 |(b) 3.50 (b) 19 1H) 126 1@) 098 |i) .048 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 682 982 .333 -258 585 445 141 127 . 134 .103 O75 .299 | 2.250 | 1.814 | 1.046 91 1,823,137 1,761,954 3.43 | 2.89 736 157 “100 ‘ “086 Pocahontas......0.-..-::-+000e0" ‘638 | 526 | _280| (236 | .609 | 1486] 1105] .103] 133 | .142 | .286 | .231 | 2.051 | 1.724 | .883 | .870 373,041 Sis is 200 | oe ok |e ieeuea Stee Pe Southern. fc: sncin, osgvinasrs Pooch ‘371 | .871] 211 | 211] .455 | 418} 1085 | 091 | 080 | 084] .274 | 1245 | 1.476) 1.415 | 847 | 801 1,408,667 1,185,138 | 3.45 | 3.25 3,250 2654 | 1082 | .052 Northwestern. .............0.008. 387 | (320 | (250| 217] (559 } .527| (116| .103| (115 | (131 ] -201 | 1252 |.1.718 | 1.550 | .886] .859| 1174974] Losz’ose | 3.90] 3.85 | 12'742| 12'108 | 1043 | ‘o42 Central Western...0.......00.0 00. “307 | (455 | (220| 1197] (561 ] 524] 135 | .103| 1123] 1114] 248 | 1229 | 1.814] 1.622] .972] 910] 1,261,730 | 1149269 | 3.33 | 3.06] 59,936} 61,435 | 1040} —.037 Southwestern.....0.. 0.0.6.0. ee "450 | 1396 | .224| 1192} 1527] |460| -103| .087| .093 | .082 | .286 | .246 | 1.683 | 1.463 | .993 | .863 482,536 505211 | 3.39) 3.62] 43198] 257302) [035 | 031 Total United States (c)...... 505 444 . 260 226 . 569 494 119 . 104 17 . 108 304 .261 | 1.874 | 1.687 .991 .902 | (6)7,748,139 (6)7,201,873 |(b) 3.76 |(b) 3.36 |(6)119,381 |(6)101,782 |(b) .038 |(b) .036 Bureau of Statistics * Excluding mixed and Special (a) Separation not available August 26, 1920 t Including mixed and Special (6) New York Central figures not available t Cost including freight charges (c) New York Central expense data for April, 1919, not available (d) Net tons consumed by locomotives in transportation train service INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION OPERATING STATISTICS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER—LARGE STEAM ROADS W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 149 Sheet No. 2 Final Summary—Subject to Revision Miles of Road Freight Passenger _ Loaded | : _ Empty | Net Ton-miles Gross Gross Ton-miles Net Ton-miles Operated ‘Train-miles* ‘Train-miles* I'reight Car-miles* Vreight Car-miles* Including Non-revenuc* ‘Ton-miles* per Freight per Freight (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (millions) (millions) Train-mile Train-mile REGION = ot 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 os pent, 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 New England.................05- 8,160 8,109 2,076 2,037 3,048 2,884 41,618 43,771 17,075 16,481 1,051 1,075 | dd) 2.2 2,269 2,304 1,093 1,131 506 528 Great Lakes...........0.2 020 e eee 21,914 21,904 7,816 7,062 6,720 6,313 241,171 235,727 126,107 94,545 7,060 6,582 7.3 14,491 13,371 1,854 1,893 903 932 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 26,544 26,527 10,479 10,014 9,900 9,645 274,167 282,806 138,982 131,854 9,963 9,689 2.8 18,481 18,109 1,759 1,808 951 968 Pocahontas. «5 ice ccseac che uawan oe 5,339 5,218 1,942 1,835 983 957 57,620 56,878 38,751 36,979 2,463 2,319 6.2 4,456 4,227 2,294 2,303 1,268 1,263 Southem: ccencess ta sigvad whe ed ay oe 37,254 37,019 7,854 6,805 6,501 6,358 168,844 161,095 79,159 59,930 4,740 4,114 15.2 9,877 8,672 1,258 1,274 604 605 Northwestern. ...........0.00 0005 47,387 47,008 7,638 7,684 6,476 6,323 199,432 214,050 98,846 96,512 5,744 5,725 0.3 11,606 11,946 1,520 1,555 752 745 Central Western..............---- 52,204 51,862 10,256 9,837 8,623 8,052 262,252 268,930 124,067 119,194 6,822 6,717 1.6 15,062 14,898 1,469 1,514 665 683 Southwestern.............000.000- 31,675 31,674 4,956 4,417 | 4,114 3,852 107,182 99,021 49,892 39,907 2,808 2,457 14.3 6,125 5,331 1,236 1,207 567 556 All Regions..............-. 230,477 229,321 53,017 49,691 46,365 44,384 | 1,352,286 | 1,362,278 672,879 595,402 40,651 38,678 5.1 82,317 78,858 1,553 1,587 767 778 : Average Number of Serviceable Cars on Line Daily Estoont Net naa os an of : Car-miles | Net Ca Net yale of Gross per Freight Total Freight : Nuinber of Percentof Total] P& Car-day{ | per Car-day per Loaded need Ton-miles Train-mile (a) Car-miles Home Foreign Total Cara Stored Gaiaon Lane Car-mile* 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 | 1919 | 1920 | 1919 | 1920 1919 1920 1919 New England..............0.+06- 46.3 46.7 29.3 30.6 70.9 72.6 16,440 14,585 86,766 80,175 103,206 94,760 226 | 92.1 | 91.0] 17.6] 19.5 | 315 348 25.2 24.6 Great: Lakese .ccsinccacee au na beeen 48.7 49.2 48.0 47.8 65.7 71.4 69,856 58,755 351,507 337,529 421,363 396,284 2,934 92.2 | 91.4 | 26.8 | 25.5 516 507 29.3 27.9 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 54.1 53.5 40.4 42.4 66.4 68.2 144,921 (b) 418,006 (b) 562,927 548,380 1,495 | 95.8 | 90.2 | 23.5 | 22.8 | 566 532 36.3 34.3 Pocahontas: éi.665 cess as ees ce as 55.3 54.9 50.6 52.1 59.8 60.6 31,579 26,871 47,594 58,454 79,173 85,325 gies 183 91.3 | 91.3 | 37.1 | 33.5 948 828 42.8 40.8 Souther ics cadonsgainrecee ers oe¥ es 48.0 47.4 32.6 33.5 68.1 72.9 47,864 (b) 199,364 (b) 247,228 242,682 393 1,598 | 92.3 | 90.9 | 31.1 | 27.8 | 594 517 28.1 25.5 Northwestern.............-000-55 49.5 47.9 40.1 41.4 66.9 68.9 126,316 121,504 186,214 219,377 312,530 340.881 250 319 | 91.4 | 91.9 | 29.5 | 28.3 | 566 521 28.8 26.7 Central Western...............--- 45.3 45.1 38.7 40.5 67.9 69.3 87,875 112,556 226,329 238,269 314,204 350,825 64 211 | 92.6 | 91.6 | 38.5 | 34.3 | 678 592 26.0 25.0 Southwestern..............0.00005 45.8 46.1 32.7 32.5 68.2 71.3 32,690 (b) 164,000 (b) 196,690 190,830 150 96 | 94.7 | 94.1 | 25.6 | 23.2 | 458 410 26.2 24.8 All Regions..............-5 49.4 49.0 39.2 40.4 66.8 69.6 557,541 (b) 1,679,780 (b) 2,237,321 2,249,967 857 7,062 | 93.2 | 91.4 | 28.4 | 26.7 | 568 527 30.1 28.4 Cost per Freight Train-mile—Selected Accounts} (c) Cost per Passenger Train- Net Tons of Coal Cost of Gallons of Oil Charged mile ’ Charged to Coal per to Account 394 (d) |Cost per Gallon (e) Locomotive Other Loco. & | Enginehouse Total Selected Selected Account 394 (d) Net Ton (e) (thousands) REGION Repairs Enginemen Fuel Train Supplies Expenses Trainmen Accounts Accountst 1920 1919 1920 | 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 New England. ...........-.. 00065 $.526 | $.394 | $.362 | $.271 11.040 | $.567 | $.081 | $.066 | $.129 | $.089 | $.427 | $.319 |$2.565 [41.706 [$1.445 |$1.072 404,691 362,946 $8 . 84 SOs now wee W ee. ee aes | ate Great: Lakesic.:..ccaca dees oe tees A 1S .489 .359 .237 .799 -468 . 084 114 .140 . 106 424 .254 | 2.324 | 1.668 | 1.176 .912 1,596,524 1,377,831 5.23 3.27 267 825 $. 100 $.041 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 653 575 .433 . 292 .685 .430 .161 .136 .137 .098 497 .326 | 2.566 | 1.857 | 1.165 938 2,196,915 2,089,531 4.24 2.75 216 159 .123 .075 Pocahontas: n6 <6 e ces oe ed es 636 .480 .359 . 263 .820 -498 .134 .121 . 144 .109 . 366 .255 | 2.459 | 1.726 | 1.100 .865 424,314 404,837 4.38 25005 |\ euecdresee [pea teste Wace uh Beetles DOWNES: eoswae s etc ote i uaearaiwss ee 395 368 .238 .196 .497 . 364 .098 114 .099 081 .310 .244 | 1.637 | 1.367 . 980 175 1,301,161 1,179,546 4.15 2.91 2,250 1,952 047 .023 Northwestern. .......0.....200 006: .403 314 .278 .218 . 594 471 ATT .182 .120 O91 333 .255 | 1.905 | 1.481 | 1.023 .853 1,221,671 1,218,468 4.43 3.43 11,245 11,232 .045 O41 . Central Western................0- .489 .408 .261 . 206 .598 .A76 141 .124 .119 .092 . 3806 .229 | 1.914 | 1.535 | 1.069 .935 1,457,731 1,408,570 3.57 2.85 73,790 69,903 .046 .036 Southwestern...............00005- 509 413 .259 . 205 .563 433 .108 121 .103 .089 341 .267 | 1.883 | 1.528 | 1.087 911 441,301 473,618 4.39 3.32 38,497 23,838 039 024 All Regions............2... 508 .436 315 233 .651 .450 .129 .122 .123 094 3876 .266 | 2.102 | 1.601 | 1.114 .903 | 9,044,308 8,515,347 4.54 3.10 126,265 107,909 044 034 Bureau of Statistics December 3, 1920 * Excluding mixed and special trains ¢ Including mixed and special trains (a) Includes caboose car-miles (b) Separation not available (c) Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie, Missouri, Kansas & Texas and Wichita Falls & Northwestern figures not available. . : : abe: (d) Quantity consumed by locomotives in road transportation service only—Atlanta & West Point, Western Railway of Alabama, Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie, Missouri, Kansas & Texas, Wichita Falls & Northwestern, and Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe figures not available. (e) Cost including freight charges. (For nine months’ figures see other side) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION OPERATING STATISTICS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDING WITH SEPTEMBER—LARGE STEAM ROADS Final Summary—Subject to Revision W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 149 Sheet No. 3 Miles of oad Freight Passenger Loaded Empty Net Ton-miles Gross Gross Ton-miles Net Ton-miles Or - t a ‘Train-miles* ‘Train-miles* Freight Car-miles* Freight Car-iniles* Including Non-revenuc* ‘Ton-miles* per Freight per Freight perave (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (millions) (millions) Train-mile ‘Train-mile RiEGion 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 Ee Se 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 New England...................- 8,137 * 8,109 18,025 16,094 25,513 24,255 350,039 335,280 131,918 132,425 8,528 7,866 8.4 18,505 17,482 1,027 1,083 473 489 Great Takes: : ci viiccawewnwneane’ 21,921 21,904 | 65,420 | 58,429 58,003 | 55,379 | 1,988,739 | 1,827,447 | 826,272 | 859,224 | 57,370 | 50,084 14.5 | 115,070 | 104,305 1,759 1,785 877 857 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 25,867 25,698 | 86,844 78,365 84,854 81,826 | 2,229,670 | 1,965,050 | 1,063,848 | 1,077,332 77,072 69,594 10.7 | 144,203 | 133,456 1,660 1,703 887 888 Poeahontas... 2.0.0... 0.0 5,340 5,210 16,669 14,332 8,816 9,220 490,749 423,810 302,374 275,936 20,438 17,070 19.7 36,874 31,311 2,212 2,185 1,226 1,191 POUGHELB 652 cstsusuesoues d bie, aiay OM Medak Gee 4 37,192 36,999 71,996 58,683 60,609 - §9,586 | 1,592,688 | 1,338,317 664,688 551,140 42,031 33,601 25.1 88,755 72,271 1,233 1,232 584 573 Northwestern...........00e0ss 00. 47,254 47,049 63,880 57,398 57,187 55,775 | 1,639,679 | 1,511,137 | 677,144 | 661,468 44,565 40,142 11.0 90,701 83,140 1,420 1,448 698 699 Central Western............0.0-- 52,027 51,831 85,150 74,483 76,877 70,581 | 2,175,974 | 1,943,655 | 924,512 | 862,665 56,649 48,986 15.6 | 122,009 | 107,899 1,433 1,449 665 658 Southwestern. ..............200005 31,691 31,542 43,353 37,174 36,844 34,335 947,967 793,971 400,856 357,801 24,311 19,559 24.3 ~ §2,631 43,439 1,214 1,169 561 526 , All Regions.............2.. 229,429 228,342 451,337 394,958 408,703 390,957 111,415,505 |10,138,667 | 4,991,612 | 4,777,991 330,964 286,902 15.4 668,748 593,253 1,482 1,502 733 726 Average Number of Serviceable Cars on Line Daily Percent Net oe Fencent ead of : cc ' Net co Net Ton-miles of Gross per Freight otal Freight : Number of Percentof Totall Per Car-dayt | per Car-dayt per Loaded ies Ton-miles Train-mile (a) Car-miles Home Foreign Total Gare Stored Cats ou Line Car-mile* 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 | 1920 | 1919 | 1920 | 1919 | 1920 | 1919 1920 1919 New England..................-- 46.1 45.1 27.8 30.1 72.6 71.7 16,480 15,204 92,235 76,363 108,715 91,567 4,161 | 92.6 | 92.1 | 15.1 | 17.5 267 293 24.4 23.5 Great Lakes......0........00 cee 49.9 48.0 44.1 47.0 70.6 68.0 60,572 57,832 387,494 341,895 448,066 399,727 71,179 | 92.7 | 92.7 | 21.3 | 22.9 | 434 427 28.8 27.4 Ohio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 53.4 52.1 38.9 39.8 67.7 64.6 120,250 (b) 428,156 (b) 548,406 516,122 17,443 | 93.4 | 91.1 | 20.5 | 19.7 480 450 34.6 35.4 Pocahontas..........2 00000002000 55.4 54.5 48.6 49.8 61.9 60.6 23,208 30,942 50,095 58,246 73,303 89,188 seins 2,160 | 91.6 | 92.6 | 36.2 | 26.7 | 933 650 41.6 40.3 Southern.............- SAeaaerme eee 47.4 46.5 32.4 33.2 70.6 70.8 48,470 (b) 233,620 (b) 282,090 288,835 133 25,408 | 92.8 | 92.8 | 27.3 | 22.8 508 406 26.4 25.1 Northwestern. ...............-005 49.1 48.3 37.3 38.9 70.8 69.6 109,902 123,175 218,255 218,165 328,157 341,340 4,903 | 15,802 | 92.3 | 93.0 | 24.2 | 22.0 | 463 406 27.2 26.6 Central Western.................- 46.4 45.4 37.4 38.7 70.2 69.3 . 97,598 131,960 238,006 223,799 335,604 355,759 718 | 22,352 | 93.7 | 93.3 | 32.0 | 27.4 584 477 26.0 25.2 Southwestern...........-.-00--000 46.2 45.0 32.1 32.0 70.3 68.9 33,993 (b) 170,336 (b) 204,329 210,260 9,330 | 22,428 | 94.6 | 95.2 | 23.1] 19.5 | 417 330 25.6 24.6 All Regions..............-- 49.5 48.4 37.4 38.8 69.6 68.0 510,473 (b) 1,818,197 (b) 2,328,670 2,287,798 15,084 | 180,933 | 98.1 | 92.7 | 24.1 | 22.3 | 486 429 29.0 28.3 Cost per Freight-train-mile—Selected Accountsf (c) Cost per pean Train- Net aoe ef Coal by of Gallons of Oil cen 6 mile : arged to oal per to Account 394 Jost per Gallon (e) Locomotive Other Loco. & | Enginehouse Total Selected Selected Account 394 (d) Net Ton (e) (thousands) Raion Repairs Enginemen Fuel Train Supplies Expenses Trainmen Accounts Accountst 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 1920 1919 New England.................--- $.455 | $.374 | $.342 | $.258 | $.909 | $.648 | $.075 | $.073 | $.130 | $.115 | $.382 | $.302 |$2.293 1$1.770 1$1.388 |$1.100 3,621,484 3,181,602 | $7.72 | $5.67 | 20... cee | cece | wee eee | cee eee Great Lakes. ....00.0 000000. 509 443 384 238 . 680 494 .123 116 141 .119 379 .272 | 2.166 | 1.682 | 1.092 887 14,171,997 11,748,283 4.20 3.35 1,089 4,268 $.097 $.043 Obio-Indiana-Allegheny............ 691 . 584 .389 . 283 619 441 .148 .139 .133 .110 .434 .315 | 2.414 | 1.872 | 1.145 .927 19,662,888 17,185,702 3.62 2.76 1,768 1,379 .107 -085 Pocahontas. .... 0.00000. 632 497 318 . 261 .712 497 .181 124 .137 .130 .312 .258 | 2.242 | 1.767 | 1.033 874 3,795,143 3,317,480 3.52 DeOO|) sei cnereedee | shaedeec ene AY Sear. I sel setiek Southern............,2...--02----{ 891 .357 230 . 190 468 -401 .095 .093 089 .090 . 293 .239 | 1.566 | 1.370 . 922 . 766 12,593,922 10,596,766 3.69 3.15 27,550 22,235 .032 045 Northwestern.............-0-00e . 400 .313 . 268 .221 . 586 .519 .147 112 .122 .110 dil .255 | 1.834 | 1.530 . 983 . 848 10,808,591 10,104,717 4.04 3.49 111,189 104,051 .043 .042 Central Western..............-.-- 486 427 243 . 203 .572 -oll .130 .123 118 .107 .277 .227 | 1.826 | 1.598 | 1.026 . 904 12,870,479 11,285,472 3.38 2.97 652,830 583,358 .040 .037 Southwestern.................2005 469 .3895 248 .201 541 .461 .118 .103 .099 .092 .823 .260 | 1.798 | 1.512 | 1.0389 .870 4,228,317 4,198,987 4.08 3.47 332,166 199,154 . 034 .028 All regions................% .504 | .431 .292 | .229 .598 } .480} .126|] .115 | .119 | .107 .339 | .264 | 1.978 | 1.626 | 1.063 .886 | 81,752,821 | 71,619,009 3.95 3.21 | 1,126,537 914,445 .038 .036 (For September figures see other side) * Tixcluding mixed and special trains t Including mixed and special trains a) Tneludes caboose car-miles (b) Separation not available (c) Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Maric, Missouri, Kansas & Texas, and Wichita Falls and Northwestern figures not available. (dq) Quantity consumed by locomotives in road transportation service only—Atlanta &West Point, Western Railway of Alabama, Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie, Missouri, Kansas & Texas, Wichita Falls & Northwesten and Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe figures not available. (e) Cost including freight charges Bureau of Statistics Deceinber 3, 1920 ANALYSIS OF FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAIN EARNINGS ON FOURTEEN ROADS OPERATED EXCLUSIVELY IN TRUNK LINE TERRITORY, FOR (Compiled from statistics in ‘‘Poor’s Manual of Railroads—1920”) W. H. WILLIAMS EXHIBIT No. 150. THE CALENDAR YEAR 1919 Philadelphia Lehigh Lehigh Lehigh Delaware, New York,| Delaware Long Ulster a Buffalo, Buffalo | Pittsburgh, Traffic Statistics 1919 and News erey Valley and New | and Hudson) Lack. and Ontario and Total Island and Mec a Rochester and Sus- | Shawmut & Total ea Reading England River Western & Western Hudson Delaware & Pittsburgh | quehanna |; Northern ¢ Freight: Average miles operated................... 1,126.63 686.12 1,485.95 231.94 96.90 955.53 569.49 887.62 5,990.18 398.38 128.88 698.31 589.73 296.56 209.51 2,321.37 8,311.55 Revenue freight moved (tons)............. 63,210,463} 35,489,418) 30,934,972] 6,749,758, 5,322,354] 25,982,548] 5,165,934) 23,644,671) 196,500,118 5,912,833 553,732 17,098,196 11,063,670] 1,965,985 1,203,068] 37,797.484/ 234,297,602 “1 mile (tons)....... 6,648,921,950| 2,478,351,934| 5,780,482,737| 252/571,910| 383,194,047| 4,830,065,815| 602,704,487| 3,531,432,611| 24,507,725,491| 127,868,238] 41,676,211| 1,656,778,729] _1,694,808,357| 215,168,111) 102,201,730] 3,838,501,376) 28,346,226,867 “ “ “ 1 mile per mile road 5,901,602 3,612,126 4,025,545| 1,088,954; 3,984,532 5,054,855| 1,058,323 3,978,541 4,091,317 320,971} 323,372 2372, 555 2:873,872 725,547 487,813 1,653,550 3,410,462 Average haul per ton (miles).............. 105.19 69.83 186.86 37.42 72.00 185.90 116.67 149.35 124.72 21.63 75.26 96.90 153.19 109.45 84.95 101.55 120.98 Average revenue train load (tons). . 944.69 671.50 878.40 581.25 836.22 859.71 558.00 782.80 705.58 295.26 211.17 985.00 883.61 498.04 537.08 793.63 716.34 Average revenue per ton.................. 0.892 0.922 1.669 0.558 0.478 1,997 1.239 1.24 1.202 1.065 1.191 715 1.065 1.005 845, 898) 1.110 Average rate per ton per mile (cents).. 0.848 1.320 0.893 1.490 0.664 1,074 1.062 0.830 .964 4.915 1.583 0.738 0.696 0.918 -994 885 953 Earnings per freight train mile............. 8.01 8.86 7.84 8.66 5.55 9.24 5.60 6.54 6.80 14.77 3.34, 7.27 6.22 6.05 5.34, 7.02 6.82 Passenger: } Passengers carried............00cceeeeeee 29,922,290} 30,445,113 6,796,350 198,654 133,652| 27,281,789] 1,761,870 5,086,660, 101,626,378) 64,067,541) 402,523 1,712,606 1,963,743 179,940 196,074/ 68,522,427/ ‘170,148,805 Passengers carried 1 mile................. 708,394,136] 460,966,346, 262,693,218 721,153] 1,705,222| 646,828'562| 91,369,678} 132,884,475| 2,305,562,790| 1,022,941,429| 12,026,567 42;919,237 57,828,468 2,746,619) 2,381,131] 1,140,843,451) 3,446,406,241 Passengers one mile per mile road.. ue 628,773 671,845 182,940 3,109 17,598 676,932 160,441 158,738 384,890 2,567,753 93,316 84,680 98,059 9,262 11,365 491,453 414,653 Average distance per passenger (miles). . er 23.67 15.14 38.65 3.63 12.76 23.71 51.86 26.12 22.69 15.97 29.88 25.06 29.45 15.26 12.14 16.65 20.26 Average rate per passenger per mile (cents) . 1.532 1.771 2.599 2.863 2.890 1.914 2.952 2.450 1.919 1.526 2.672 2.510 2.752 2.980 3.074 1.645, 1.828 Earnings per passenger train mile.......... 2.62 2.08 1.17 39 2.84 2.61 1.95 1.89 2.57 1.32 1.34 .80 43 2.19 1.97 2.16 1.82| W. H. Williams Exhibit No. 151 STATEMENT SHOWING “AVERAGE HAUL PER TON” (MILES) REVENUE FREIGHT FOR THE RAILROADS IN THE NEW ENG- LAND DISTRICT, 1910 to 1919. COMPILED FROM STATISTICS AS SHOWN IN “POOR’S MANUAL OF RAILROADS,” I. C. C. REPORTS AND DATA SECURED FROM BUREAU OF RAILWAY ECONOMICS. 1919 1918 1917 1916 1915 1914 1913 1912 1911 1910 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT ; Central New England..................... 73.26 70.44 71.35 71.73 72.56 66.83 42.40 42.59 45.39 *46.18 New York, New Haven & Hartford......... - 111.44 91.94 91.86 87.40 *91.65 *91.80 *96.43 *94.95 *93.80 *93.44 Boston & Maine................ cc cee ee eee 124.20 119.98 117.43 114.83 | *106.55 | *106.46 | *106.82 | *103.86 | *102.54 | *102.84 Boston & Albany............... ccc cee cea 125.08 123.14 124.99 123.94 119.30 113.50 115.91 113.68 ee pas Maine Central........... 00... cece cece eee ee 111.12 103.33 99.48 *96.80 *93.96 *96.40 *90.13 *90.16 *84.74 *88.90 Bangor & Aroostook...................000- 119.78 124.95 128.24 126.49 125.79 | *126.93 | *182.06 | *125.51 | *122.79 | *118.58 Rutland se. Sek ote ie ee GU Bae nee 93.37 105.82 107.80 108.00 | *112.66 | *109.27 102.40 109.54 115.22 119.71 Central Vermont ................. 0000 eens 73.92 63.08 61.72 TAT *80.14 *79.08 *73.78 *76.73 *76.13 *79,.27 Average haul per road New England District 112.47 103.44 102.78 100.87 99.14 98.06 97.20 95.84 93.04 98.71 * Years ended June 30th. z ! W. H. Williams Exhibit No2O3 o NEW ENGLAND STATES POPULATION TAKEN FROM 1920 CENSUS RETURNS 25 miles 50 miles from from coast line coast line Connecticut ......... 1,380,681 ........... SOL700" hoeeeneecks “agvesdens 1,346,116 Percentage. . 64.58 Percentage... ........ 97.50 Rhode Island ........ 604,897 ........... BOOMGI. wii. OGadeedeeee: 604,397 Percentage. . 98.57 Percentage... ........ 100.00 Massachusetts ....... 3,802,000" eesee eae e se 1,982:656> “nssamecouae, soaseies 2,369,443 Percentage. . 51.47 Percentage... ........ 61.51 i New Hampshire ...... 443,083 ........... 84,718 sdesesancee Seaaaraes 255,043 4 Percentage. . 19.12 Percentage... ........ 57.56 i MEME 3hc4ceseeckuns BOGOIE -oehep tenes AUTHOR? ideceeshe abe dieds 591,079 i Percentage. . 53.07 Percentage... ........ 76.96 a Total .saia ceeds TOAS ASL eee wenewes 3 962463) 2c2geacneee oadheadedars 5,166,078 Percentage... 56.21 Percentage... ........ 13.29 (a State. Connecticut . Rhode Island Massachusetts eee ee NEW ENGLAND STATES POPULATION 25 MILES FROM COAST LINE County Fairfield New Haven ... Middlesex New London .. Balance Add. . Washington ... Kent Providence .... Newport Bristol Total Deduct Plymouth Norfolk Bristol Middlesex Essex Total Deduct ee a Population 320,936 415,214 .. 47,550 104,611 . 8,389 .. 891,700 24,932 .. 88,269 475,190 .. 42,893 .. 28,118 604,397 8,606 595,791 .. 156,968 .. 219,081 .. 859,005 .. 178,352 .. 482,156 . . 1,995,562 .. 12,906 . . 1,982,656 County Town FAIRFIELD. Deduct New Fairfield Brookfield Total NEW HAVEN. Deduct Wolcott MIDDLESEX. Deduct Cromwell Total Deduct . WINDHAM. Add ‘Plainfield Balance Add PROVIDENCE. Deduct Burrillville ... MIDDLESEX. Deduct Tyngsborough Ashby Townsend Pepperell Groton Littleton Westford Dunstable ee ee ew ww wee ww re we Ce ee eat eee ee CY Population ‘ci State. New Hampshire . . County .. Rockingham ... Strafford ..... Total ...... Deduct ..... VOrk. «sy sucun Cumberland ... Sagadahoe. .. Lincoln ...... Washington ... Balance Add .. Population 52,498 70,696 124,376 23,021 15,976 26,245 21,328 30,361 41,709 53,886 407,593 County Town Population HILLSBOROUGH. Add PEAT satreny rene unerace cpanel arate 974 ROCKINGHAM. Deduct Northwood ................0.. 891 WVGOVHEI A) stoke crcccw G Ar wrergaeare aerate 746 CAN la: <3. ies atte bens we enee s 780 ANB UYIE: | 0 a a0-tia av sdesane,Aacasi rave selene’ 652 Londonderry ................. 1,308 TOtsa)! axcamece nee se eaae 4,372 STRAFFORD. Deduct Middletown .................. 174 MC ON 5 eer ede eos oss setae 1,428 New Durham ................. 462 ULAMORG. add. wieitasencs dower aera o.0408 764 Gal G2 be ioadars tetas epee 2,828 Deduct ROCKINGHAM. 4,372 STRAFFORD. 2,828 Ota oe ee bowed hound ears 7,200 Add HILLSBOROUGH. 974 Balance Deduct ........... 6,226 YORK. Deduct Parsonfield ....... .........5 1,062 Cornish! acc 30 “arcs eeekdsres bees 813 INewiield: ec, “adres Hea wisi eoedes 5381 Totaly <. casidsiaweneeeeead 2,406 CUMBERLAND. Deduct Otisfield ..................00. 581 HarrisOn: ( vdceseaneaans be 901 Bridgeton, s.schasresesGee eons 2,546 Naples ave stcicatdwiesee ea ewais 514 SEBAGO? os: 4) sath doncahe Qunstengel sseaar aes 541 Ota tse cee. Cocke kas 5,083 HANCOCK. Deduct Township 32 ................. 18 Plantation 83) os 26654 0erecrice 4 49 EL OULALS 232. 0h pos iG cette ees 67 WASHINGTON. Dedtict Danforth. 065 os sewers wea ves 1,201 Kossuth Plantation .. bs Reo 40 Topsfield. s. 2.060404 dearstench 272 Codyville Plantation . . ..... 80 WAIT OS ve. casse. dct os att oh spay eieycns amet teene 8 186 ImdlantOwWi, ¢ .4ieredsweacen a 136 PriNCElOM: ack 5 nbc tines teehee 4 934 Grand Lake Stream .......... 231 Lambert Lake Plantation 119 LOGAN: eceos arn es oes rer Bie oak 2 3,199 cali det mae esi pace eee cons (ai County Population i Add Add Deduct County Town ANDROSCOGGIN. Wales Webster Lisbon Durham Auburn Poland PENOBSCOT. Dixmont Newburg Hampton Carmel Hermon Bangor Orrington Brewer City Eddington Clifton .... Total ... ANDROSCOGGIN. PENOBSCOT. YORK. CUMBERLAND. HANCOCK. WASHINGTON. Total i wk ee BP WE SRy a, er Br eh wy RR. Wer ee ae wt Se Population Cr ey ee ee State. Connecticut Rhode Island Massachusetts ee NEW ENGLAND STATES POPULATION 50 MILES FROM COAST LINE County County Population Town LITCHFIELD. Fairfield ...... 820,986 Deduct Salisbury New Haven ... 415,214 Sharon Litchfield ..... 716,262 Canaan Middlesex .... 47,550 Cornwall Hartford ..... 336,027 Norfolk New London .. 104,611 Colebrook Tolland ....... 27,216 Winchester Windham ..... 52,815 Barkhamsted POtal: saci 1,380,631 Total Deduct oe ewe 34,515 HARTFORD Total 32sec 1,346,116 Deduct Hartland pny Granby Suffield Enfield Total Deduct LITCHFIELD. HARTFORD. Total Washington . 24,932 Kent ........ 38,269 Providence .... 475,190 Bristol ....... 23,113 Newport ..... 42,893 Total ...... 604,397 Worcester 455,135 WORCESTER. Plymouth ..... 156,968 Deduct Royalston ..... Norfolk ...... 219,081 Winchendon Bristol ....... 359,005 Ashburnham Middlesex .... 778,352 Athol Essex ........ 482,156 Templeton —— Gardner .. Potala su8 43 2,450,697 Westminster Deduct ..... 81,254 Phillipston . ——- Petersham Total ...... 2,369,443 Habbardston Dana Barre Hardwick Oakham New Braintree West Brookfield North Brookfield Spencer Warren, Brookfield Sturbridge Millbury .... Auburn Oxford eee ee we hee we hw oe we we ee Ce Ce a ee ee ew ew ee wm wwe eee eee ee we wee ee eee we oe ow re ee ee Y eee er ee ew ew eee ere rere ee eee ee eo eee e ree ee eee ee eww ew ew wo ee ee eee Population State New Hampshire . . . Hillsboro County Rockingham ... Strafford Balance Add . ere ee oot eee Population 135,512 52,498 38,546 28,487 255,043 Deduct Hillsboro JSG AT c © eee ide dente assev inca aoa ene a aceelerataun Add Add Add Add County Town HILLSBORO. Hancock Peterboro Sharon New Ipswich Temple Greenfield Francestown ..... Deering Weare MERRIMACK. Pittsfield Epsom Allenstown ...... Hooksett Dunbarton Bow Canterbury Chichester Concord .. BELKNAP. Alton Gilmanton Barnstead Gilford CARROLL. Freedom Effingham Ossipee .. Wolfeboro Tuftonboro ...... Total MERRIMACK. BELKNAP. CARROLL. Total Deduct HILLSBORO. Balance Add .. eee eee ee ee eee Ce ee ee Ce eee ewe meee ee es Ce Population 1,221 814 873 738 3,646 467 393 1,122 2,178 611 4,771 29,912 3,646 4,771 38,329 9,842 28,487 State. re] County VOrk: .cscea0s Cumberland ... Sagadahoe .. Androscoggin . Lincoln ...... KnOX:. 45 sxe Kennebec ..... Waldo ....... Penobscot Hancock ..... d Washington ... Balance Add . Population Add Add Deduct County Town OXFORD. POPEEE ceadace grace Brownfield ........... Denmark ........... Fryeburg ............ Sweden ............. ANDANY™ tcc are en ie wes Greenwood ........... Buchfield ............ Woodstock ........... Hartford ............ SOMERSET. MeGRCEr™ 2 vow se ates Smithfield ........... Patheld: acces anitemcs woes Norridgewock ......... Skowhegan ........... Cornville ............ Pittsfield: f distributing increased revenue be determined upon, it is recommended that the details be worked out by the Traffic Officers. “Second: A proper distribution of the amount contributed by the New England lines by means of a pool under Section 407 of the Transportation Act. This method would require the consent of all interested carriers and approval of the Interstate Commerce Commission. “Unless some method of allocating to the New England lines a substantial amount of revenue in excess of 30 per cent. increase in freight rates is made effective before September 1st, 1920, the insolvency of some of these lines seems inevitable. It is unnecessary to point out that Trunk Line and Canadian carriers have a vital interest in the ability of the New England lines to maintain adequate transportation service, and that the disorganization of transportation in New England resulting from failure to provide adequate revenue for these lines would not only react on their immediate connections, but would also indicate a failure of the Transportation Act to provide a solution of the general railroad problem. “This matter has been discussed informally with the Chairman of the Interstate Commerce Commission who expressed the desire that the interested lines should attempt to adjust it between themselves, avoiding, if possible, the necessity of referring it to the Commission. In case the carriers are unable to agree to the carrying out of the purpose outlined in this statement, it will be necessary for the New England roads to apply to the Interstate Commerce Commission for relief. Such an application for relief must be submitted in time for the Commission to act upon it so the necessary revenue may be available to the New England lines not later than September 1st, and it is therefore important that the Trunk Line and Canadian carriers should indicate at an early date whether they will agree to the carrying out of the purpose of this statement and are willing to proceed to work out the necessary details.” Ww. H. Williams Exhibit No. 205 STATEMENT SHOWING AVERAGE NUMBER OF MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS PER MILE OF ROAD AND CAPITAL INVESTED PER MILE OF ROAD (a) taken from page 57—(6) taken from page 546, Vol. 8 (1910) 13th Census of the United States eee. I Sanh (a) (b) Miles umber of nvested in me ‘ Manufacturing | Manufacturing ecaaiAmoan | ages | Sly | Belahnents | Balabichments er Mile o er Mile o: Road Road New England: Massachusetts........0000.00.0.0...0000 even 11,684 $1,279,686,558 2,115 Maine....... seta aah aches elton sera oben 3,546 202,259,592 2,248 New Hampshire......................... 1,961 139,989,662 1,245 VGRMOM cor oa -neca ere ney oat eee angnneie eee eae 1,958 73,470,107 1,100 Rhode Island............................ 1,951 290,901,270 212 Comme ctiouti rigs 2 aag:cia.s cap sistvenncs dics wtiacd dare artes 4,251 517,546,554 1,000 OCA aig ce cnstatigs Seo ocenere oa nnnereeunaye keatee 25,351 $2,503,853,743 7,920 3.201 $316,143 Middle Atlantic: Gg Shi sass sacra seas en ae eae en a 44,935 $2,779,496,814 8,429 Ne@W -Jers@ ys osccc. 3s tustn ate cceceyes wine bg Beige weal 8,817 977,172,141 2,260 Pennsylvania.........0.0000...0.00 cece eee 27,563 2,749,005,975 11,209 Otel iis.st ade rnde omen emeeas 71,315 $6,505,674,930 21,898 3.257 $297,090 East North Central OIG se iiicct palais doz tle aden seme oewdaronamasece Beles 15,138 $1,300,732,732 9,134 DINE Bo csssestiecbatcr a onectien soraaeniu reene tabireyoniulrtans ats 7,969 508,717,197 7,420 STATIONS tsegieanet es Beer owcecd ef Bae Nile asa roccee 18,026 1,548,170,701 11,878 MCh Panis secur celsonate dol detie weatriacecaaealee 9,159 583,946,965 9,021 PO tals ss scan ohisncds aoe eos ae 50,292 $3,941,567,595 37,453 1.343 $105,240 Other: DCA WERE cscs inteermaecn a> RASA rea Sea 726 $60,905,671 334 rs ch ca Re nS NO 4,837 251,226,828 1,426 POPE a5 eras seat sets 2a ap ate create cee 5,563 $312,132,499 1,760 3.161 $177,348 W. H. Williams Exhibit No206 BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD J. H. HUSTIS PRESIDENT North Station, Boston, May 29, 1920. Mr. W. H. WILLIAMS, Vice-President, The Hudson Coal Company, 26 Liberty Street, New York, N. Y. Dear Mr. Williams: With reference to your letter of May 26th and previous correspondence in regard to eastbound movement of coal: I did not intend to place the burden for the recent accumulation of eastbound business upon abnormally high shipments of anthracite coal. The purpose of my letter was to indicate that regardless of the impression to the contrary which arises from the frequent placing of embargoes, we have been handling a normal volume of business. Various causes have contributed to the accumulation, and while the actual shipments of coal from your territory may not have been above normal, the fact that the New England railroads have been called upon within the last two or three years to assume the all-rail movement of a large coal tonnage which previously moved by water, with practically no additions to their existing facilities, has necessarily been one factor in making it difficult for these railroads to meet the demands placed upon them. It is expected that the eastbound embargoes will be removed within a day or two and while it is inadvisable to make any predictions, it is hoped that if there are no further complications, east- bound business can be handled currently as offered. Yours truly, (SIGNED) J. H. HUSTIS, President. THE HUDSON COAL COMPANY OFFICE OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT 26 LIBERTY STREET, NEW YORK WwW. H. WILLIAMS May 26, 1920. Dear Mr. Hustis: Absence from the city has prevented earlier acknowledgment of your favor of May 14th, out- lining the situation with reference to eastbound movement via the Boston & Maine. I fear my letter of May 10th was not entirely clear, as I infer from your letter that you are under the impression that coal going into New England is now above normal. On the second page of your letter you refer to the heavy coal shipments into New England and also to the diversion of coal from water to rail routes. As indicated in my letter of May 10, 1920, the shipments of anthracite into New England are not abnormal. The Domestic tonnage is only 7,000 tons greater than a year ago, 5,000 tons of which increase were forwarded by Peterson & Packer to points on your line west of Worcester, Massachusetts and, thereby, involved a short haul. Although the deliveries of steam sizes show an increase of 25,000 over last year, they are less than the normal year. The shipments in 1919 were below normal due to some plants being over-stocked during the war period and desiring to reduce the same when they were assured of obtaining enough to meet their day-to-day needs. The Delaware and Hudson Company informs me that the bituminous coal movement over their line is somewhat less than last year. The thought I attempted to express in my letter of May 10th is that the output of the mines this year is below normal by reason of the flooding of the mines and poor car supply in the anthra- cite field, and by reason of poor car supply in the bituminous field. For the past month or six weeks the transportation conditions have made it impossible to forward anthracite coal to points west of Buffalo, and have materially curtailed the production of bituminous coal in said territory. Later, that market must be supplied with coal. Meantime, such coal as is being produced in the East has been going into New England owing to better transportation conditions and New Eng- land has been receiving more than its fair proportion of the limited output. Notwithstanding this fact, New England has not received more than anormal amount of coal. Later, when transporta- tion conditions west of the Hudson River and, particularly, west of Buffalo, improve, the territories which are not receiving any coal today will have to be given consideration and at that time it will be impossible to put coal into New England. It seems quite improbable that the total output of the mines will permit of a normal supply of coal for each of the markets this year. If coal can go forward into New England at this time, New England is likely to receive a greater tonnage during the coal year April 1, 1920 to March 31, 1921, than if New England must now stop receiving coal, and be in position to take it only when the other markets have been opened up. Doubtless you are aware of the fact that the deliveries of anthracite for New England points have been much greater during the summer months than during the winter months for some years past. The railroads have never been able to handle in each of the winter months one-twelfth of the amount of coal required per year. Therefore, a shortage at this time cannot reasonably be expected to be made up during the winter months even though the coal were available, which now seems unlikely. As to the diversion of coal from water to rail, it is true that some four and one-half million tons were so diverted. This diversion, however, occurred in the latter part of 1917 and extended all through the years 1918 and 1919, and the New England lines are not being asked to handle more coal now than they did in the years 1918 or 1919. None of the above comments is intended to in any way relate to the railroad situation of New England. They are intended to reflect the coal situation and the probable results that will come if the normal amount of coal cannot be gotten into New England in the summer months, and in the hope that consideration would be given to this phase of it in the placing of embargoes or in the grant- ing of permits for certain classes of freight to go forward as long as embargoes are in existence. Yours very truly, (SIGNED) W. H. WILLIAMS. Personal Mr. J. H. Hustis, President, Boston & Maine R. R. Boston, Mass. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD J. H. HUSTIS PRESIDENT North Station, Boston. May 14, 1920. Mr.W. H. WILLIAMS, Vice President, The Hudson Coal Company, 26 Liberty Street, New York, N. Y. Dear Mr. Williams: I have your letter of May 10th outlining the situation with reference to eastbound movement to the Boston & Maine. The facts as to the accumulation are substantially as stated, but your information that we are moving eastbound about four hundred cars per day is not correct as we are handling considerably in excess of that number from The Delaware and Hudson alone, and our total eastbound movement from Hudson River gateways is averaging about nine hundred per day, and recently has been exceeding one thousand. There is no question but that the Boston & Maine would not be able at the present time to handle all eastbound business offered if restrictions were removed. The lines to the South have not yet recovered from the effects of the recent labor troubles, and this fact together with the accumu- lation in the West has made it necessary for us to issue embargoes. On May 4th we placed an embargo against both The Delaware and Hudson and New York Central making an exception, how- ever, on both anthracite and bituminous coal. On May 3rd The Delaware and Hudson, of their own accord, placed an eastbound embargo on bituminous coal coming to the Boston & Maine which, of course, had the effect of giving preference to anthracite shipments. These limited embargoes were not sufficient, however, to prevent the accumulation, as coal forms such a large portion of the east- bound tonnage, and on May 11th both anthracite and bituminous coal were embargoed both via The Delaware and Hudson and New York Central. The embargoes and accumulation no doubt give the impression that the Boston & Maine is not handling a normal business, but the fact is that our eastbound movement from the Hudson River for the month of April, 1920, was largely in excess of April, 1919, and about equal to the average April movement of the three previous years. Your letter indicates that one reason for the heavy coal shipments to New England has been the labor troubles in the West. Another reason for the heavy burden on eastbound rail movement is the reduction in movement of tidewater coal into New England due to conditions which arose dur- In 1915, 38% of the commercial coal tonnage handled by the Boston & Maine reached ing the war. : . New England by tidewater, while in 1919 only 87% of the total was handled in this manner. So 4 far as all-rail coal tonnage is concerned, we handled over 100,000 tons more in April, 1920, than in April, 1919, and nearly as much as in 1917. I have given you these details in order to make it clear that in spite of the labor troubles of our connections, and the accumulation of business resulting from the adverse weather conditions in February and March, we are actually handling a fair average business. This does not mean that we are content with an average and that we do not appreciate that the coal situation in New England requires the very best efforts that can be made to take advantage of these months when production is heavy and weather conditions are good. It is useless to permit loading for New England points until we are in a position to handle all cars currently, but I can assure you that the embargoes will be modified just as soon as the present condition has been relieved, and that every effort will be made to assure the free movement of coal. Yours truly, (SIGNED) J. H. HUSTIS, President. THE HUDSON COAL COMPANY OFFICE OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT 26 LIBERTY STREET, NEW YORK Ww. H, WILLIAMS May 10, 1920. Dear Mr. Hustis: The Delaware and Hudson Company people inform us that there are in your yard at Mechan- icville this morning 1,530 cars for movement east; in addition to this, The Delaware and Hudson is holding for you 3,107 cars and the New York Central people claim to be holding approximately 2,000 cars, thus making nearly 7,000 cars on hand at Mechanicville or backed off on the New York Central and The Delaware and Hudson for movement east bound via the Boston & Maine, and your people appear to be moving east about 400 cars per day. Effective midnight, May 4th, The Delaware and Hudson Company placed an embargo on ship- ments originating at points off their line for movement to Boston & Maine points, and are threaten- ing to extend this embargo to include traffic originating on The Delaware and Hudson. Should this action be taken, it will create a most serious condition from the standpoint of this Company and, more particularly, from the standpoint of the consumers of anthracite who are located along the line of your road. The production of anthracite has been below the demand for the past two or three years and owing to the very late spring there is relatively speaking no coal on hand in the dealers’ yards nor in the cellars of consumers. Our contractual obligations for tonnage to Boston & Maine points are in excess of last year. On the other hand, owing to matters beyond our control, our sales for Boston & Maine points show little change, as indicated by the following statement of deliveries since April 1, 1920 (the begin- ning of the new coal year) as compared with the same period 1919: PREPARED STEAM 1920 1919 1920 1919 Tons Tons Tons Tons @ Br Catin& Giese 3,441 4,075 37,008 14,301 @anteld & Preeti occa eee ease 113,249 110,543 715 165 20,474 15,377 2,248 — Peterson & Packer_---------------------- 137,164 129,995 39,966 14,466 Although the deliveries of steam sizes show some increase over a year ago, they are not abnor- mal (steam tonnage April 1 to May 7, 1918, aggregating 41,114 tons.) 6 With the termination of the war the users of steam sizes had on hand some 8 to 12 months’ supply and very materially curtailed their orders. This year they are, relatively speaking, living from hand to mouth and deliveries may be said to represent their day-to-day needs. Generally speaking, the Boston & Maine has not been able to take care of the movement of coal through the winter months and for the past ten years it has been our practice to increase our deliv- eries in the summer months in order that the movement over your line would be reduced to the minimum during the winter months. If, however, your line is going to be unable to handle the coal in the summer months, it will make it impossible to take care of the domestic needs for the winter months. In this connection, you are doubtless aware of the adverse effect on transportation on the lines west of Buffalo and south of the New York Central due to the strike of yardmen and certain other railroad employes. This makes it impossible for us to make deliveries of coal for points west of Buffalo and very materially curtails our ability to make deliveries for points south of the New York Central. We must take advantage, therefore, of this opportunity to get the coal into the markets where there are no labor troubles, and when the labor troubles are ended on the other lines we shall have to divert our deliveries to those points and at that time we shall not be in position to make deliveries for Boston & Maine points. If your people cannot take the coal now it will not be possible to get it later on. I would appreciate it very much if you could let me know just what the situation is and if there is anything we can do to help out in the matter, and how soon we are likely to find it possible to get coal into New Engand. Your very truly, (SIGNED) W. H. WILLIAMS. Mr. J. H. Hustis, President, Boston & Maine R. R. Boston, Mass. ee or hae ns eres rd