RISE OF METHODISM INTHE WESD = WILLIAM WARREN SWEET 8x 62g / W52- Gornell University Library Ithaca, New York che. Publishers... Sve. University Library iN iit 1924 0 | olin THE RISE OF METHODISM IN THE WEST BEING THE JOURNAL OF THE WEST- ERN CONFERENCE 1800-1811 EDITED, WITH NOTES AND INTRODUCTION, BY WILLIAM WARREN SWEET Professor of History, DePauw University THE METHODIST BOOK CONCERN NEW YORK CINCINNATI SMITH & LAMAR NASHVILLE DALLAS RICHMOND 1 I A 446764 CoPYRIGHT, 1920 BY SmitH & LAMAR AND THE METHODIST Book CONCERN TO THE MEMORY OF MY FATHER AND MOTHER PREFACE. Tur manuscript Journal of the old Western Conference is the property of the Ohio Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and has, for the past number of years, been deposited in the Library of Ohio Wesleyan Univer- sity. The Journal of the Western Conference covers nine- ty-seven pages of the manuscript volume, while the latter part of the volume is given over to the Journals of the Ohio Conference from 1812 to 1826, inclusive. None of these Journals have before been published. Unfortunately Methodism has not been careful of her historical docu- ments, and it is hoped that the appearance of this docu- ment may encourage the publication of others. In many respects the Journal of the Western Confer- ence is the most important historical document relating to the establishment of Methodism in the Mississippi Valley. The heart of Methodism lies in the Mississippi Valley; there live the bulk of her membership, there she has performed her greatest achievements, and there per- haps lies her most brilliant future. For these reasons, if for no others, the materials in this volume deserve pub- lication. Outside of the Editor, two others have shown particular interest in this book, and to them especial thanks are due. The first is Rev. Dr. W. E. Arnold, of Fort Thomas, Ky. ; the second is Mr. George H. Maxwell, of Boston, whose interest in Methodist history is quite largely responsible for this publication. GREENCASTLE, IND., October 2, 1919. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART I. INTRODUCTION. PaGeE. PREPAGE ig ga wigs ¥4c yaa seeded Wa eae oe kauedies waie bd aauaousdasivea ewes 5 Cuaprter I. The Coming of the Circuit Rider Over the Mountains........ 11 Cuapter II. The Western Conference, 1800-1811................ 22... eee 23 Cuaprter III. The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider.............-.... 38 Cuapter IV. The Circuit Rider as a Factor in Frontier Society........... 58 PART Il. THE JOURNAL. I. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1800...... 73 II. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1801...... 75 III. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1802...... 80 IV. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1803...... 84 V. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1804...... 2 VI. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1805...... 100 VII. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1806...... 110 VIII. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1807...... 123 IX. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1808...... 138 X. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1809...... 153 XI. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1810...... 173 XII. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1811.... .. 191 PART I. INTRODUCTION. CHAPTER I. THE COMING OF THE CIRCUIT RIDER OVER THE MOUNTAINS. 1782-1800. Tun Methodist Episcopal Church dates from the Christ- mas Conference which met in Baltimore on December 27, 1784.1 The American Revolution had closed and the Treaty of Paris had just been signed. John Wesley, al- though a consistent supporter of the British during the American war and an opponent of the rebelling colonists,” yet when the war was over was wise enough to see that it would be best for all concerned to separate the Ameri- can societies from the English Conference, and according- ly sent over to America, toward the end of 1784, Dr. Thom- as Coke and two other English preachers to supervise the organization of the new American Church. The events of the Christmas Conference are familiar to all Methodists. Francis Asbury, the only English Methodist preacher who had remained in America throughout the Revolution, was named by Mr. Wesley as General Superintendent for the American Church. Asbury, however, refused to accept the place solely on Mr. Wesley’s appointment, but only after election by the preachers. At the time of the organization of the Methodist Epis- 1Jesse Lee, “A Short History of the Methodists in the United States of America; Beginning in 1766, and Continued Till 1809” (Baltimore, 1810), pages 69, 70, 91-93. Wesley’s letter setting forth his plan for the organization of the Church in America will be found in “Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church for the Years 1773-1828” (New York, 1840), page 21. *For John Wesley’s attitude toward the American Revoluticn, see John Wesley’s “Journal,” Vol. VI.; reviewed in American Historical Review, Vol. XXI., pages 346-348. 12 The Rise of Methodism in the West. copal Church there were not more than 14,000 Methodists in America. The largest proportion of the membership was in the Southern States. Between 1777 and 1783 there was but one appointment north of some parts of New Jer- sey, while during the Revolution practically every preach- er received into the ministry by the Methodists was from the South.? Methodism as yet had made no progress in New England, though in New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey it had gained a foothold and there were flour- ishing societies especially in Philadelphia and New York. After the close of the French and Indian War, in 1763, a few backwoodsmen, especially from Virginia and the Carolinas, began to find their way over the mountains into what is now Kentucky and Tennessee. First came the hunters, Daniel Boone and his kind, to be followed by Sevier and Robertson and their kind. By the outbreak of the Revolution a number of English settlements had sprung up on the Tennessee and the Cumberland, as well as in Western Virginia and the Carolinas. These fron- tiersmen took part in the War for Independence under George Rogers Clark, while their settlements, under the stress of Indian wars and dangers from frontier condi- tions, were largely self-governing and self-sustaining. Al- together it was a rude and shifting population, made up largely of game hunters and Indian fighters who had set- tled this Western region. Many of them never took per- manent root in the region, but moved on westward, farther into the wilderness, and the descendants of those who fought under Clark at Vincennes or at King’s Mountain “are as likely to be found in the Rockies as in the Alle ghenies.” With the close of the Revolution the tide of westward *DeVinne, “The Methodist Episcopal Church and Slavery,” pages 11-13; also “Minutes of Conferences,” Vol. I., for the years indicated, The Coming of the Circuit Rider. 18 immigration greatly increased. At first they came mostly into Kentucky, and those who now came were of a differ- ent character from the pre-Revolutionary pioneers. ‘These caime to find homes, and were often representative of the gentry of the seaboard. The long war had left them in straitened circumstances, and now they were looking to- ward this new and fertile country as a means of more eas- ily staying their impending ruin. Such was the composi- tion of the immigrants who within a dozen years following the close of the Revolution completely swamped the orig- inal settlers. The pre-Revolutionary pioneers had been slow to establish cultural institutions, such as schools and churches; but the new settlers brought with them their institutions, their educational and religious ideals, and it was not long after their coming until churches and schools began to spring up in the wilderness. Both the organization and doctrine of the Methodists were well suited to the frontier. The circuit system which John Wesley devised and put into operation in England was brought to America by Asbury. When Asbury came to America he was urged to settle down in the centers of population ; but he was so thoroughly saturated with Wes- ley’s plan of organization that he would listen to no other.’ So Asbury himself became an itinerant preacher, as all the Methodist preachers in America in that early day. The circuit system meant that a preacher served not one community, but a whole group of communities. These circuits varied in size. In the newer countries, where settlements were much scattered and far between, they covered many square miles of territory, and the preacher occupied from four to six weeks in making the rounds of the circuit. Nor was he particular where he conducted ‘Theodore Rocsevelt, “The Winning of the West,” Vol. IIL, pages 63-71. °Ezra Squire Tipple, “Francis Asbury, the Prophet of the Long Road” (New York, 1916), page 158. 14 The Rise of Methodism in the West. his services; a log cabin, or the barroom of a tavern, or out under the trees—all were alike to him. He preached whenever and wherever he found any one to listen, with little regard to either time or place. Moreover, the system of lay or local preachers was one which lent itself easily to the spread of Methodism in a new country. A young man who showed any ability in public speaking was urged by the class leader and the circuit preacher to exercise his gift on every possible occasion, and when the presiding elder came around to hold the “quarterly meeting confer- ence” the young man was recommended for an “exhort- er’s” or “local preacher’s” license. He did not often trav- el a circuit, but he preached in his own and neighboring communities, and in many instances was instrumental in organizing new classes in frontier settlements before the regular circuit rider or presiding elder arrived upon the scene. Indeed, the first Methodist classes organized west of the mountains represented the work of these lay preach- ers. They were generally men of little learning, but full of earnestness and enthusiasm, and their preaching was marvelously effective. The Methodist itinerant also preached a doctrine which made a great appeal to the frontiersman. He preached a gospel of free grace, free will, and individual responsibil- ity. He brought home to the pioneers that they were the masters of their own destiny, as opposed to the Presbyte- rian and Baptist doctrine of predestination and foreordi- nation. Methodist theology thus fitted in exactly with the new democracy rising in the West, for both empha- sized actual equality among all men. On one occasion when Peter Cartwright was attending a Conference in Nashville he was chosen to preach a sermon in one of the local churches. While he was preaching General Jackson ‘David Sherman, “History of the Discipline’ (New York, 1890), pages 202-207, for regulations relative to local preachers. The Coming of the Circuit Rider. 15 came in, whereupon one of the preachers seated behind him pulled Cartwright’s coat and whispered, “General Jackson has come in.” Cartwright states that he felt a wave of indignation sweep over him, then he replied in an audible voice: “Who is General Jackson? If he don’t get his soul converted, God will damn him as quick as he would a Guinea negro!”? This was certainly Jacksonian democracy, and typifies the attitude of the average Meth- odist itinerant on the frontier. Included among the immigrants coming out from Vir- ginia, North Carolina, and the other seaboard States were numerous local preachers of the Methodist Church. No sooner were they settled and their log cabins built than they began to gather the Methodist families together and organize them into classes.2. Two such local preachers were Francis Clark and John Durham, both from Virginia, who settled in Mercer County, Kentucky, in 1783. By the next year numbers of other local preachers had come into the State and were at work organizing Methodist classes. The General Minutes for 1782 record the sending of a regular circuit preacher to the Yadkin country, and the next year both Yadkin and Holston are listed among the circuits, while in 1784 the Redstone Circuit, in the south- west corner of Pennsylvania, is added to the number. Two years later (1786) the Yadkin Circuit reported 426 white members and 11 colored, the Holston 250 white members, and the Redstone 523.° In this same year the Kentucky Circuit appears, with James Haw as elder and Benjamin Ogden as circuit preacher. Methodist families had evidently come into Kentucky in considerable num- bers, especially from Maryland and Virginia, for at the ™Autobiography of Peter Cartwright, the Backwoods Preach- er” (New York, 1856), page 192. SAlbion H. Redford, “History of Methodism in Kentucky” (Nashville, 1868), Vol. I., page 26. *“Minutes of Conferences,” Vol. I., page 26. a 16 The Rise of Methodism in the West. end of the first year 90 members are reported from this new circuit.?° As population in Kentucky, Tennessee, and along the Ohio increased, the number of circuits and circuit preachers likewise grew. The year 1786 was one of revival in these far western circuits, and among the converts was Peter Massie, the first convert in Kentucky to become a circuit rider. The Minutes for 1789 record the following circuits for this new country:'t In Tennessee were the Holston, West New River, Greenbrier, and Botetourt; in Kentucky were Lexington, Danville, and Cumberland ; while along the Upper Ohio were the Redstone, Pittsburgh, and Ohio Circuits. The Yadkin Circuit lay in Western North Carolina and the Holston in Western Virginia. In 1797 the membership in the Kentucky circuits was 1,740 whites and 57 colored, and in Tennessee 534 whites and 42 colored.” With the close of the Indian wars and the signing of the treaty of Greenville in 1794, the southern half of Ohio and a narrow strip in what is now Southeastern Indiana were opened up to settlement. Settlers from Kentucky and Tennessee, as well as from the older States, began to move into these new grants. Many of them were members of Methodist classes in the States from which they had come, and so numerously did they come into the new coun- _ try that there was an actual decrease of membership in the Kentucky and Tennessee circuits from 1797 to 1801. Of these years one of the pioneer preachers writes: “The Indian war having terminated, the people began to scatter in every direction. New settlements were formed, Ohio and Indiana began to settle rapidly; and the societies, many of them, were broken up, and we had not preachers Redford, “Methodism in Kentucky,” Vol. I., pages 27-32, 44Tbid,, page 102. “Minutes of Conferences,” Vol, I., page 74. The Coming of the Circuit Rider. 17 sufficient to follow the tide of emigration to their new settlements.”?® The first circuit to be formed in Ohio was organized in 1798 by John Kobler, who had been appointed presiding elder of the Kentucky District. He crossed the Ohio and preached in the home of one of these Kentucky Methodists who had migrated to the north side of the river. The Miami Circuit, as the new circuit was called, ran from the Ohio up the Little Miami and Mad Rivers to where Day- ton now stands, thence down the Big Miami to Cincinnati. The second Ohio Circuit was the Scioto, organized in 1800 and included settlements on both sides of that river.' The first Governor of Ohio, Edward Tiffin, was a Method- ist local preacher, ordained by Bishop Asbury in 1792. He had come from Virginia to Chillicothe in 1796, and in 1799 was elected territorial representative ; and when Ohio became a State, in 1803, he was chosen the first Governor. His home was always open to Methodist preaching, and likewise served as the stopping place of many a weary itin- erant.’® While the Methodist circuit riders were finding their way into the Ohio Valley and founding circuits along the banks of its tributaries, other preachers, equally zealous, were penetrating into the great Southwest. Tobias Gib- 13“Autobiography of Rev. William Burke,” in James B. Fin ley’s “Sketches of Western Methodism” (Cincinnati, 1854), page 73. In 1797 there were 1,740 white and 57 colored members re ported for Kentucky, while in 1799 the membership had de creased to 1,672 white, though there was a gain of eight colored members. The Tennessee membership for these years showed little change, though it was less in 1799 than in 1797 by nearly a hundred. (“Minutes of Conferences,” Vol. I., pages 74, 86.) 14John M. Barker, “History of Ohio Methodism” (New York, 1898), pages 88, 92. Also Redford, “Methodism in Kentucky,” Vol. I., page 227. 185A sketch of Governor Tiffin may be found in Finley’s “Sketches of Western Methodism,” pages 260-287. 2 1S The Rise of Methodism in the West. son was appointed Missionary to the Southwest in 1798. Starting from the Cumberland settlements, he traveled on horseback some four or five hundred miles; then, trad- ing his horse for a canoe, he paddled to all the Southwest settlements, preaching wherever he found hearers, finally making his way back to the Conferences in Northern Ten- nessee in 1802.1° This vast circuit received the name of Natchez and in 1799 reported 60 members. The administration of the Church in this vast new ter- ritory was under the management of Bishop Francis As- bury and the presiding elders whom he appointed. Nor was he an absentee supervisor, directing the work from a comfortable seat east of the mountains. Between 1788 and 1800 at least eighteen Conferences were held west of the mountains.17 The first of these was in May, 1788, at a place in East Tennessee called Half-Acres. Master- son’s Station, in North-Central Kentucky, was a favorite place to hold Conference during these early years, for here the preachers met in 1790, 1791, 1792, 1798, 1795, and 1796; in 1794 a Conference met at Lewis’s Chapel, near Master- son’s Station, while at Bethel Academy, in Kentucky, Conferences were held in 1797, 1799, and 1800. Bishop Asbury was in attendance upon a number of these far Western Conferences, and as the earlier ones were held during the progress of the Indian wars, several times the bishop was escorted over the mountains by a guard of the Western preachers armed for the purpose. The first Conference to be held west of the mountains was conducted by Bishop Asbury in East Tennessee, at a place called Half-Acres.1® Asbury states in his Journal that the Conference sat three days and he preached each day. The **John F. Hurst, “History of Methodism” (New York, 1904), Vol. IV., pages 572, 573. 17Minutes of Conferences,” Vol. I., pages 29-89. **Francis Asbury, “Journal” (New York, 1821), Vol. II., page 32. The Coming of the Circuit Rider. 19 Bishop came into Tennessee by way of Virginia, and fol- lowed the valley of the Holston to the seat of the Confer- ence. He found the people in disorder over “the new and old State.” At this time the people of Eastern Tennessee were in rebellion against North Carolina. North Carolina had ceded her western lands to the United States in 1784, but to the manner of this cession the Watauga settle- ments objected. Previous to this North Carolina had neg- lected the western settlements within her territory, and had left them without government; and now, when she proceeded to cede them to the United States, the people of the western settlements objected, and proceeded to organ- ize a State of their own, calling it the State of Franklin. On this action by the people of the new settlements, North Carolina rescinded her cession and proceeded to subdue the rebellious westerners. The State of Franklin ceased to exist in February, 1788, though conflicts between the old and new State parties continued until the autumn of that year, when Sevier, the Governor of the new State, was arrested and imprisoned on the charge of treason. In 1790 Bishop Asbury was once more in Tennessee, having crossed over from North Carolina. He speaks in his Journal of swimming the horses across the Watauga and of dangers from the Indians. He found the “poor preachers indifferently clad, with emaciated bodies.” In May of this same year, after returning to the East, he crossed again from Virginia to Kentucky, accompanied to the foot of the mountains by two Kentucky preachers, Peter Massie and Jobn Clark. Later their company was joined by eight others, and their number finally reached sixteen men and thirteen guns. Passing into Kentucky, they crossed the Kentucky River, going “over mountains, steep hills, deep rivers, and muddy creeks, and thick growth of reeds for miles together.” He saw the graves of the slain, twenty-four in one camp. He held conference at Masterson’s, “a very comfortable house and kind peo- ple.” Here plans were laid for the establishment of Bethel 20 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Academy, which was the first Methodist institution of learning West of the mountains, and $300 was obtained in subscriptions. On his trip to Kentucky in 1792 the Bishop heard “so much about Indians, Convention, Treaty, kill- ing, and scalping,”?® that his attention was drawn away from the affairs of the infant Church in the wilderness; and after much alarm concerning depredations committed by the Indians, he finally returned to Virginia with a com- pany of “thirty-six good travelers, and a few warriors.” Eighteen such trips over the mountains were made by Bishop Asbury between 1788 and the time of his death, 1816. In 1792 the first serious schism in the Methodist Epis- copal Church took place, headed by James O’Kelly, a prominent preacher East of the mountains, who objected to Asbury’s supreme appointing power.?° Those who with- drew with O’Kelly called themselves Republican Method- ists, and a number of adherents were won in Kentucky and Tennessee. Most of them, however, finally united with the sect known as the New Lights; and the Republican Meth- odists, as a separate organization, went out of existence, in spite of the fact that the name Republican was popular in the West. Most of the Methodists in the Western coun- try were Jeffersonian Democrats in their politics, as were also many of the Methodists in other States.*? Beginning in 1797, a great revival swept over the West- ern country, which profoundly stirred whole communities and affected every Protestant sect. It began in Kentucky, on the Cumberland, under the influence of a Presbyterian ?*Tbid., Vol. II., pages 74, 126, 137. *°Lee, “History of the Methodists,” pages 178-180; Nathan Bangs, “History of the Methodist Episcopal Church” (New York, 1839), Vol. I., pages 351-856; Cartwright, “Autobiography,” pages 32, 33. 21Alfred Brunson, “Western Pioneer” (Cincinnati, 1872), Vol. L., pages 38-43. This gives an interesting account of the relation of the Methodists and Jeffersonian Democrats in Connecticut. The Coming of the Circuit Rider. 21 minister, James McGready. It was under the influence of these meetings that the camp meeting originated, which became thereafter a Methodist institution that was em- ployed with great effectiveness on the frontier, though the Methodists did not themselves originate it. The revival continued for eight years, and through its influence the membership in the Western circuits was more than dou- bled and the number of local and traveling preachers was greatly increased. Indeed, it was largely through the influence of this revival that preaching was begun north of the Ohio in what is now Ohio and Indiana. During these early years the Western circuits and dis- tricts were more or less indefinite in their boundaries and their organization loose. From year to year they under- went considerable change, both as to boundaries and names, and the Conferences were irregularly held. The Conference held in the West in 1788 was called the Hol- ston, while the two Conferences held in 1790 were known as the Holston and the Kentucky. In 1791, besides the two Conferences already noted, a third, called the Green- brier, was held. The Western Conferences of 1793 are the Nashville, Kentucky, Greenbrier, and New Territory; while in 1794, besides the New Territory and Kentucky Conferences, one is held at Mitchell’s. After 1795 the Western Conference is generally called either the Holston or the Kentucky Conference.?* By 1800, the year of the organization of the Western Conference, there were 2,307 white members in Kentucky and Tennessee and 177 colored. Of this number, 1,626 white members were in Kentucky and 681 were in Ten- nessee, while of the colored members 115 were in Ken- tucky and 62 in Tennessee. In the Northwest Territory there were three circuits, the Miami, the Scioto, and the *2Catherine C. Cleveland, ‘“‘Great Revival in the West,” 1797- 1805” (Chicago, 1916), Chapters 2, 3. Also Redford, “Methodism in Kentucky.” »3¢Minutes of Conferences,” Vol. I. 22 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Muskingum and Hockhocking, with a white membership of 364 and 2 colored; while along the Mississippi to the south of Tennessee was the Natchez Circuit, which reported in that year 81 white members. In the years following the Revolutionary War, 1783 to 1800, the Methodist Church had successfully followed the immigrants across the mountains to their new homes in the West. Indeed, no other Church was so well suited to minister to the wants of these immigrants. “It alone was so organized as to be able to follow step by step this mov- able population, and to carry the gospel even to the most distant cabin. It alone could be present whenever a grave was opened, or an infant was found in its cradle.’** The other sects moved westward toward the Mississippi as fast as any number of their adherents formed part of the emigration thither, but Methodism alone exercised a weighty influence upon the mixed crowd. And it is from this class, the great unchurched crowd, that the Methodist Church in the West was to draw the largest proportion of its membership. “From an article first printed in the Revue des deux mondes, by M. Cucheval-Clavigny; translated and reprinted under the title, “Peter Cartwright and Preaching in the West,” Methodist Keview, Vol. LIV., pages 556, 577, Vol. LV., pages 69-88. CHAPTER II. THE WESTERN CONFERENCE. 1800-1811. Tus chapter is to deal with the progress of the Method- ist Church in the West during the first twelve years of the nineteenth century, which is the period covered by the life of the Western Conference. The name “Western Confer- ence” did not come into use until toward the close of the eighteenth century, and the General Minutes continue to designate the Western circuits as the Kentucky District as late as 1800. By the beginning of the new century Methodist circuits had been established in Kentucky, Ten- nessee, Ohio, and along the Mississippi in what is now the State of Mississippi. These circuits were included in one district, presided over by William McKendree. McKen- dree was a Virginian and had begun to preach in his na- tive State in 1788. For twelve years he traveled circuits east of the mountains; but in 1800 Bishops Asbury and Whatcoat, passing through Virginia on their way to the West, took McKendree along with them, and at the Con- ference of 1800 he was made presiding elder of all the Western circuits.t| No better choice could have been made for a frontier presiding elder, and for eight successive years he is the major general of the frontier Church. By the next year, 1801, the number of Western circuits had increased from 9 to 13 and a new district, the Holston, was formed, with John Watson as presiding elder. In 1802 there are seventeen circuits and three districts, the third district being the Cumberland. In 1804 a fourth district was added, which was formed of the Ohio circuits, 1W. C. Larrabee, “Asbury and His Colaborers,” Vol. II., pages 214-217. 24 The Rise of Methodism in the West. now grown to five.2. It was in this year also that Benja- min Young was sent as a missionary to Illinois. It may have been that Benjamin Young was sent upon this mis- sion as a matter of discipline, for he is charged in the Conference of that year, “of having said that he composed a certain song, when in truth he did not; that he had the misfortain to fet his horse’s thye broke, when it was not so; and that he baptized contrary to the order of the M. E. Church.” He was admitted into the Conference and or- dained elder only “after a plain talke, and hopeful prom- ises.”? Whatever may have been the reason for sending Benjamin Young as a missionary to Illinois, the fact re- mains that, in spite of many difficulties, he succeeded in forming five classes among the Illinois settlements and at the end of the year reported sixty-seven members. He was received very coldly, however, among the Kaskaskia settle- ments, and at Kaskaskia was compelled to pay high rent for the hall in which he preached; and to increase his difficulties, the Kickapoo Indians made away with his horse.* Previous, however, to the coming of Benjamin Young to Illinois, Methodism had been introduced into the coun- try by Methodist laymen. Capt. Joseph Ogle seems to have been the first Methodist in the State, having come to the Illinois country in 1785. In 1793 Joseph Lillard, a local preacher, visited Illinois and gathered a few scat- tered Methodists into a class and appointed Ogle class *General Minutes, Vol. I. *MS. Journal of the Western Annual Conference, 1803. At the Conference of 1804 Benjamin Young was expelled from the Church. William McKendree, who presided at that Conference in the absence of Bishop Asbury, was responsible for the ex- pulsion. It is probable that Young’s misconduct was more in the nature of imprudences rather than immoral conduct. (Lea- ton, “Methodism in Illinois,” page 35.) ‘James Leaton, ‘History of Methodism in Illinois from 1793- 1832” (Cincinnati, 1883), pages 34-37. The Western Conference. 25 leader. Five years later John Clarke, who had been a traveling preacher in South Carolina, visited Illinois and crossed over into Missouri and was very probably the first Protestant minister to preach West of the Mississippi. The same year that Clarke visited [linois, a local preach- er, named Hosea Rigg, from Western Pennsylvania, set- tled in St. Clair County, Illinois, reorganized the class formerly led by Ogle, and also established a second class in what is now Madison County.® While Benjamin Young was at work in the Illinois country among the scattered settlements along the Mis- sissippi, circuit riders from Kentucky and Ohio were find- ing their way into Indiana. By the year 1800 the white population in what is now Indiana was nearly 3,000. Vin- cennes, the old French settlement, and vicinity had 1,538, while Clark’s Grant, a tract of land granted to George Rogers Clark by Congress, and situated on the north bank of the Ohio, contained 919.6 Most of the English settlers had come from Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and North Carolina. Some of them had been Methodists in the older States, though there were Baptists, Presbyterians, and Quakers among them,” The first reliable record of Meth- odist preaching in Indiana was in 1801, at a settlement located in Clark’s Grant. Two local preachers, Samuel Parker and Edward Talbott, crossed the Ohio and con- ducted a two days’ meeting in the new territory.2 It was William McKendree, the presiding elder, however, who established the first official Methodist class in Indiana. In the summer of 1802 he was taken across the Ohio in a canoe and two classes were formed, one at Charlestown, 5Ibid., pages 27-33. *Logan Esarey, “History of Indiana,” Vol. I., pages 123, 124, 127. ™.C. Smith, “Indiana Miscellany,” page 43. ®8W, ©. Holliday, “Indiana Methodism,” page 37. 26 The Rise of Methodism in the West. the present county seat of Clark County, and the other near by at a place then called New Chapple.’ Following these earliest classes came Benjamin Lakin in 1803, then traveling the Salt River Circuit in Kentucky, and he added the two new Indiana classes to his Kentucky circuit. At the session of the Western Conference in 1805 Peter Cartwright, who had been admitted into the Confer- ence in 1804, was appointed junior preacher on the Salt River and Shelby Circuit. In his autobiography he states: “Brother Benjamin Lakin and myself crossed the Ohio River and preached at Brother Robertson’s and Prather’s. In this grant we had two classes and splendid revivals of religion.”?° Into the narrow strip of territory, in the southeast cor- ner of the present State of Indiana, which had been opened up to settlement by the treaty of Greenville (1794) fol- lowing General Wayne’s campaign against the Indians, - had come by 1805 a considerable population. The valley of the Whitewater River was particularly well settled. Here in 1805 were two settlements, one a little south of the present city of Richmond, called the Kentucky settle- ment, because most of the families had come from Ken- tucky; the other, above the present town of Brookville, was called the Carolina settlement, because most of the families had come from South Carolina. In the latter settlement were several Methodist families, and these drew up a petition to John Sale, then the presiding elder of the Ohio District, asking that a regular traveling preacher be sent them. In response to this petition, in March, 1806, John Sale sent Joseph Oglesby to form a new circuit west of the Great Miami. Fortunately we have from Oglesby himself a description ow. W. Sweet, “Circuit Rider Days in Indiana” (Indianapolis, 1916), page 4. < Peter Cartwright, “Autobiography,” page 167. The Western Conference. 27 of the formation of this new circuit,!! which became known as the Whitewater. The circuit began at the present town of Hamilton, Ohio, and at the cabin of Moses Crume the first sermon was preached. The next stop was the cabin _ of a family by the name of Gray. After opening several preaching places in Western Ohio, the young circuit rider struck General Wayne’s old road from Hamilton to Fort Wayne, which, he says, “seemed still fresh and plain.” From this road he came upon an Indian trail which led him into Indiana, and finally to the Kentucky settlement on the Whitewater. Here he preached at the cabin of a Mr. Cox and formed a class. The society was small, be- cause most of the people of this settlement were Baptists. Turning southward and following the Whitewater, he es- tablished other preaching places along that stream, finally arriving at Lawrenceburg, the county town of Dearborn County, which had been founded in 1802. From Lawrence- burg he started up the Miami, preaching at cabins oni both sides of the river until he arrived at the place of beginning. - This route was traveled by Oglesby every four weeks until the next meeting of the Western Conference, in Septem- ber, 1806. Following Oglesby on the Whitewater Circuit came Thomas Hellums and Sela Paine as circuit preachers. Hellums has been described as “a grave, zealous, affection- ate, and weeping preacher,” his countenance always most solemn and his subjects of discourse usually of a grave and pathetic cast, while the intonations of his voice were as solemn as death, and usually large tears dropped from his face most of the time while he was preaching.’ By the close of the year 1808 the number of preaching places on Allen Wiley, “Introduction and Progress of Methodism in Southeast Indiana” (a series of thirty-seven articles in the West- enn Christian Advocate, 1845-46), August 15, 1845. Allen Wiley, article in the Western Christian Advocate, Oc- tober 17, 1845. 28 The Rise of Methodism in the West. the new circuit had grown to twenty and the membership had reached 166. In 1808 a second Indiana circuit, the Silver Creek, was organized, which included the territory of Clark’s Grant, formerly in the Salt River Circuit, of the Kentucky Dis- trict. The circuit preacher was Moses Ashworth, a young man of twenty-four. This was the first complete circuit in Indiana. The next year a new district was formed which included the two Indiana circuits, the Illinois and Missouri circuits, besides two Kentucky circuits, and received the name Indiana District. By the next year the Indiana circuits had grown to three, with the addition of the Vincennes Circuit.1* One of the first services conducted by the circuit preacher, William Win- ans, in the old French town was held in the fort, on the Wabash. The congregation was made up of a few govern- ment officials, a few English-speaking settlers, two or three Indians, and the Governor of the Territory, William Henry Harrison. There were only a few tallow candles to furnish light for the service, and one of these was held by the Governor to enable the young preacher to read his text and line out the hymn.'* General Harrison was al- ways a firm friend of the Methodist circuit rider, although he was a communicant of the Presbyterian Church. By 1811 there were five circuits in Indiana, a fourth having been added in 1810, made up of the southern half of the Whitewater Circuit. At first this circuit was known as the Enon, a scriptural name meaning abundance of wa- ters, for the circuit preacher in making the rounds of the circuit was compelled to cross many creeks.1* Later the circuit became the Lawrenceburg. In 1811 the fifth In- 187bid., November 28, 1845. M4Volliday, “Indiana Methodism,” pages 28, 29. iwwWestern Christian Advocate, December 19, 1845. — The Western Conference. 29 diana circuit appeared, called the Patoka, which included the settlements along the Patoka River.’ The year 1811 was an important date in the history of early Indiana. It was in the fall of this year that General Harrison won the battle of Tippecanoe, which opened up much new territory to settlement, and it was also the year of the great earthquake. Quakes of the most alarming character continued through the winter of 1811 and 1812. The effects of these shocks upon Indiana Methodism and religion in general is thus described by an eyewitness :17 As a result of the continued quakes the whole country became alarmed and the most vile and hardened sinners began to tremble and quake, and to go to meeting, and weep and pray. Now every preacher, traveling and local, with the exhorters, began to hold meetings with more earnestness than ever in almost all directions, and Baptist ministers did the same, and it seemed as if almost everybody would become religious that winter and spring. The result of the earthquake is clearly indicated by the minutes. The Whitewater Circuit increased from 567 to 843; the Lawrenceburg from 306 to 480; the Silver Creek from 375 to 555; while the Vincennes Circuit was divided, probably as a result of the great ingathering. This large growth, however, was not lasting, and the next year there was a reaction, resulting in the loss of zeal and members. We have already noted in the previous chapter the or- ganization of the first Ohio circuit, along the banks of the Miami and the Scioto. So rapidly did population increase in the new territory in the early years of the nineteenth century that by 1803 Ohio was admitted as a State into the American union, and the same year the Ohio District was organized, made up of five circuits, two of which were in Western Virginia. The presiding elder of the new district was the Secretary of the Western Conference, William Burke. It took the presiding elder about eleven ?°General Minutes, Vol. I., page 211. 17Western Ohristian Advocate, January 9, 1846. 30 The Rise of Methodism in the West. weeks of travel to make the rounds of his vast district ; and because the population was so scattered he was often compelled to stay at the rude frontier taverns, which he describes as filled with “the disorder and abuse of the unprincipled and half-civilized inmates.” Often he slept on the floor of open cabins, sometimes without bed or cov- ering.1® It was in 1804 that Methodist preaching was introduced into Cincinnati, then a thriving town of some fifteen hun- dred houses. Jobn Collins,?® a local preacher from New York State, settled on the banks of the Little Miami in 1803. During the year 1804 he went to Cincinnati to pur- chase salt, and while making his purchase he asked the storekeeper if there were any Methodists in the town. To this question the storekeeper replied that he himself was a Methodist, whereupon Collins threw his arms about him and wept for joy. On further inquiry Collins learned that there were several other Methodist families in the place and arrangements were soon made for preaching at the house of the storekeeper. Here a class was organized, which became the nucleus of the Cincinnati Church. In 1807 Collins became a traveling preacher in the Western Conference, and was instrumental in forming the first so- cieties in Dayton, Hillsboro, and other places.”° In 1805-06 Peter Cartwright was the preacher on the Scioto and Hocking Circuits, being moved from the for- mer to the latter circuit in the middle of the year. The last Quarterly Conference of the year was a camp meeting conducted near the town of Marietta. To this meeting came a great crowd of “rabble and rowdies” on Sunday morning, “armed with dirks, clubs, knives, and horse- 18Hinley, “Sketches of Western Methodism,” pages 85-87. 1°See the Methodist Review for 1850, pages 324-328, for the “Life of John Collins.” Barker, ‘‘Methodism in Ohio,” page 138. The Western Conference. jl whips, and swore they would break up the meeting.” While Cartwright was preaching one of the rowdies stood up on one of the seats on the women’s side of the camp and began to talk and laugh. The preacher ordered him down, but with oaths he refused. The magistrates present were afraid to arrest the young rowdy, so Cartwright took a hand in the matter. After a general scuffle, in which the friends of law and order took the side of the preachers, order was finally restored, but only after thirty of the ruffians had been captured, and on Monday nearly three hundred dollars was collected in fines and costs.” On one occasion during this year Cartwright and his friend Axley, a preacher on the Hockhocking Circuit, were invited to dine at the house of the Governor, Edward Tif- fin.?? Axley was very crude and knew little of polite so- ciety. At the table, when he had finished eating the meat from the unjointed leg of a chicken, he whistled to the family dog and threw the bone on the floor. This caused the Governor no little merriment, and it was only with difficulty that he controlled his laughter. All the preach- ers, however, were not so crude as Axley, and he had many sterling qualities which made him one of the most useful and effective of the frontier preachers, By 1808 the increase of members and circuits in Ohio made necessary the formation of two districts in the State, the Miami and the Muskingum. The Miami contained the circuits in Southwest Ohio, while the Muskingum included the territory in Southeastern Ohio as well as several cir- cuits in Western Virginia. We have already noted the sending of Tobias Gibson, in 1798, into the Southwest. He rode through all the settle- ments to the Florida line and was the father of Meth- odism in all that vast territory. In 1802 he returned to "1Cartwright, “Autobiography,” pages 90-92. 22Tbid., pages 93, 94. 32 The Rise of Methodism in the West. the session of the Western Conference, in Northern Ten- nessee, to plead for helpers; and even though deadly con- sumption had fastened itself upon him, he returned to the Southwest, where he gave nearly two more years to his vast circuit, its farthest limits being 1,500 miles from his home.”* He preached his last sermon on New Year’s day, 1804, and died at Natchez in April.2* In 1802 Moses Floyd was appointed with Tobias Gibson to the Natchez Circuit, while the next year two other helpers came to the Southwest. In 1805 the Mississippi District was formed, with four circuits, and Learner Blackman was appointed as presiding elder. To the Appalousas Circuit—one of the circuits belong- ing to the new Mississippi District—Elisha W. Bowman was appointed in 1805. Soon after the purchase of Loui- siana, in 1803, Bishop Asbury called for volunteers to carry the gospel into the new territory. Elisha W. Bow- man offered to go. His trip to his new circuit was long and arduous. He rode on horseback to New Orleans, which, he states, he found as dirty as a pigsty and in al- most as bad condition morally. He went to the Governor, who promised him the city hall as a preaching place; but when Sunday came the hall was locked against him. There were few Americans in the city and most of them represented the dregs of society. He learned, however, of an American settlement some two hundred miles west and northwest, which he reached traveling mostly by boat, taking his horse on a platform supported by two canoes. This was in the Appalousas country, where he found set- tlements of Americans who knew “very little more about the nature of salvation than the untaught Indians,” and he states “that some of them, after I had preached, asked *Hurst, “History of Methodism,” Vol. V., pages 572, 573. **See Minutes, Vol. I., 1805, pages 125, 126, for short biography ot Tobias Gibson. The Western Conference. 33 me what I meant by the fall of man, and when it was that he fell.”?5 By 1811 the Mississippi District included nine circuits. In the early years of the work in the Southwest the preachers often were so far away that they were unable to attend the annual meeting of the Western Conference, which held its sessions either in Kentucky, Tennessee, or Ohio. In the Conference of 1807 Bishop Asbury had sev- eral letters read to the Conference which had been received from the preachers on the Mississippi District who were unable to attend, and the same year Caleb W. Cloud and Thomas Lasley, who had been elected and ordained to the office of deacon the previous year, were admitted into full connection without being present, “in consequence of their mission to Natchez.’’® Meanwhile the work in Illinois, begun in 1803, had been continued with moderate success. The Illinois Circuit in 1806 reported 110 members; in 1807 there were 218 white and 2 colored. In the fall of 1806 a missionary was sent to Missouri. This task was placed upon the shoulders of a young preacher, John Travis, who had just been admit- ted on trial into the Conference, having come recommend- ed from the “Ellenoies” Quarterly Conference. His suc- ess may be seen from the 109 members which he reported for the circuit at the end of the first Conference year. In 1808 the new Indiana District included both the Illinois and the Missouri Circuits, but in 1811 an Illinois District was formed, with five circuits, all of which, however, were not in Illinois. The Illinois and Missouri Circuits in 1811 had near 700 members. At this time the Missouri terri- tory contained not less than 16,000 inhabitants, about one-fifth of whom were slaves. 25William H. Milburn, “Lance, Cross, and Canoe; Flatboat, Rifle, and Plow in the Valley of the Mississippi” (New York, 1892), pages 357-360. 26MS. Journal of the Western Conference, 1807. 3 ’ MUSKINGUM — % =, ’ aI 0 x Reet 2 Nashville WESTERN CONFERENCE Districts, 1811. State lines - —-—-— District boundaries ------+-+-+-= The Western Conference. 35 As settlers moved in increasing numbers into Kentucky and Tennessee the number of circuits and districts in these older States had also materially increased. In 1804 there were three districts and nineteen circuits in these two States; by 1811 there were four districts and thirty- four circuits. The membership had increased accordingly. The Holston District in 1804 reported 3,122 white mem- bers and 182 colored ; the Cumberland had 2,597 white and 296 colored; while the Kentucky gave the largest returns, 3,718 white and 243 colored. The total membership in these three districts, which included the circuits in Ken- tucky and Tennessee, was 9,437 whites and 721 colored. The membership in 1811 by districts was as follows: Hol- ston, 4,068 white, 291 colored; Cumberland, 6,033 white, 562 colored; Kentucky, 3,335 white, 283 colored; Green River, 4,075 white and 279 colored—a total membership for the States of Kentucky and Tennessee of 17,511 white and 1,415 colored. In the twelve years of the life of the Western Confer- ence, from 1800 to 1811, Methodism had made a remark- able growth on the frontier. At the beginning of the new century there were not more than 2,622 white members and 179 colored in the whole Western country; twelve - years later the membership had increased to 29,093 whites and 1,648 colored. The number of circuits had grown from 9 to 69, with a corresponding increase in the number of traveling preachers. At the session of the Western Con- ference in 1800 Bishop Asbury had sent out fourteen preachers to preach the gospel in the cabins of the fron- tiersmen; in 1811 Bishop McKendree stationed one hun- dred preachers within the bounds of the Western Confer- ence. To the first delegated General Conference, which con- vened in Baltimore in May, 1808, the Western Conference elected the following men to represent them: William 36 The Rise of Methodism in the West. McKendree, William Burke, James Ward, Benjamin Lakin, Learner Blackman, Thomas Milligan, and John Sale.27_ McKendree had now spent eight years in the West, and was very probably little known among the Eastern brethren. There were few newspapers, and no religious paper in any denomination in the country, so there was little chance of a man in one section of the denomination becoming known to another. On the first Sunday of the General Conference McKendree was as- signed to preach at the Light Street Church. There were present that morning a large congregation, made up of General Conference delegates as well as members of the Church. McKendree’s appearance was not prepossessing. He was tall and of commanding appearance, but his clothes were coarse and homely and his movements were awkward and his manners rustic. Nor did the first part of his sermon strike fire. A change came when the sermon was half finished. The lion of the West made the walls of Light Street Church, as he had often made the forests of Kentucky, ring with his powerful voice, and the congre- gation seemed overwhelmed. ‘“Multitudes fell helpless from their seats as if shot with a rifle.’”’?* Then the tone of the preacher changed again and soon shouts of triumph were heard among the congregation. When he came down from the pulpit, the people gazed at him “as they might at some messenger from another world,” while the preach- ers with one accord said, “That is the man for a bishop.” Accordingly the same week he was elected. And the choice was a most fortunate one, for there was not another man in the Church better fitted to carry on the work of Asbury than this rugged pioneer who had learned the ways of the wilderness on the frontier. Beginning with the year 1800, the Western Conference 2™MS. Journal of the Western Conference, 1807. *8Larrabee, “Asbury and His Colaborers,” Vol. II., pages 207- 232. : ' \ The Western Conference. 37 generally held its annual sessions either during the last of September or the early part of October. Bishop Asbury attended eleven of the twelve sessions, though McKendree presided at the last four sessions. At the session of 1804 Asbury was sick and unable to attend, and McKendree presided, though at that time he was only a presiding elder. At the session of 1805 both Bishops Asbury and Whatcoat were present. Five of the twelve sessions of the Western. Conference were held in Kentucky, four in Ten- nessee, and three in Ohio. The first session in Ohio was held at Chillicothe, the first State capital, in 1807, while the sessions of 1809 and 1811 met at Cincinnati, then grown to be the metropolis of the State. The Secretary of the Western Conference for all its sessions except the last was William Burke.?® Burke was one of the sturdy characters of the Conference, and, though not an educated man, was evidently clear-headed and a capable officer. His penmanship is excellent, and to this day the Journal of the Conference is easily read. His spelling followed no rule, sometimes the same word being spelled different ways on the same page. Nor did he fol- low any rule for capitalization or punctuation. Some years he is lavish with his commas and semicolons, while other years the minutes lack punctuation almost entirely. In the early years he speaks of the “Mitionaries,” and it is “destrict” to the last. Learner Blackman he invariably spells “Lawner,” and there are many other peculiarities which can only be appreciated by reading the Journal. Altogether, however, the document is very creditable to the backwoods preachers, and as time went on the Journal gives evidence that both the Secretary and the members of the Western Conference are becoming more versed in the orderly management of their business and of the con- duct of the affairs of the Church in general. 2°Autobiography of William Burke, found in Finley’s “Sketches of Western Methodism,” pages 18-92. CHAPTER III. THE FRONTIER CIRCUIT AND THE CIRCUIT RIDER. Tun earliest circuits west of the Allegheny Mountains had no fixed boundaries, but were as broad and long as the settlements. In most instances settlement did not long precede the coming of the circuit rider. Occasionally a new settlement would send out a petition to the nearest presiding elder requesting that a minister be sent them,’ but in most cases it was the preacher who hunted up the congregation rather than the congregation which hunted up the preacher. The proportion of Church members in the Western settlements was very small. At the close of the American Revolution the proportion of Church mem- bers in the whole population of the United States has been estimated as one to every twenty-three, but in the frontier communities it was very probably considerably less than that. “The West was not settled by religious colonies, coming intact, with all their appliances of Church and school, with the same teacher and ferrule, the same chor- ister and tuning fork, the same deacon and the dominie they had in staid New England.”? Among the earliest settlers were adventurers and not a few desperate charac- ters fleeing from the penalties of the law in some older community east of the mountains. More numerous than these were those who came in search of cheaper homes and larger farms, though few of these were from the first fam- ilies, but rather from the second and third. ‘An example of a community petitioning a presiding elder for a preacher is the Whitewater Circuit, Indiana. (See Western Christian Advocate, October 15, 1845.) *Methodist Review, 1857, pages 280-296; article by T. M. Eddy on “Influence of Methodism on Civilization and Education in the West.” The Frontier Curcwt and the Circuit Rider. 39 Once settled in the West, the people lived in the rudest fashion. The early cabins were built of round logs, “notched down at the corners and rendered tight by ‘chinking’ them over with mortar or clay. The first cabins had no floors but the earth; but later ‘puncheons,’ or thick slabs split out of logs, hewed smooth on one side, and se- cured to the joists by great wooden pins, served as a floor.’’? Many a settler’s family spent their first winter in a three-sided camp, and most of the early cabins had no windows, but oiled paper tacked across the opening made in the logs served instead of glass. One needs but read the meager accounts of the cabins in which Bishop Asbury stopped on his various trips across the moun- tains to get a vivid description of their crowded condi- tion, the filth, the discomfort, of even the best among these early homes of the settlers in the West. On his way to the Western Conference in 1803 Bishop Asbury caught the itch, and he observes: “Considering the filthy houses and filthy beds I have met with, in coming from the Kentucky Conference, it is perhaps strange that I have not caught it twenty times.’* The rude and heavy doors, made of split logs, were hung on clumsy wooden hinges, and secured by a wooden latch drawn by a string or leather thong. One room was all the earliest cabins possessed, though often there was a loft, reached by a rude ladder, in which the children slept. The huge fireplace was of the roughest construction, often made of sticks, plastered over with mud so as not to catch fire. The dress of the people was as rude as their homes. It was made of homespun cotton or “linsey-woolsey.” The ministers were likewise clad in this same material, though even on the frontier there was a recognized ministerial garb. The preachers generally wore straight-breasted 3Ibid., 1871; article by Williams on “Early Methodism in the West.” 4Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III., page 119. 40 The Rise of Methodism in the West. coats, high standing collars, long waistcoats, and the plainest of neckties. Suspenders were a luxury which were little known on the frontier. The preachers likewise affected a peculiar mode of hairdressing; from about mid- way between the forehead and the crown of the head the hair was turned back and permitted to grow down to the shoulders.® The frontier cabins were furnished mostly with home- made chairs, tables, and beds. The chairs were hickory split-bottomed, while the bedsteads were stationary, fas- tened to the sides of the cabin. The mattress of straw rested upon slats, for there were no springs on the fron- tier. A well made, clean bed, with tastefully made quilts and high bolsters, snowy white sheets and blankets was the greatest pride of the frontier housewife. Such were the cabins in which the first Methodist preaching in the West was conducted. The first settlements in a new country were always lo- cated along the banks of creeks or rivers, generally near some good spring. The reason for so locating the settle- ments was in order that a supply of water might never run low and also because the valleys contained the most fertile soil. The circuit rider, making his way for the first time into a new country, followed the path or trace from set- tlement to settlement, stopping at each cabin as he came to it, to make inquiries as to the neighborhood, whether there were any of Methodist leanings about, and as to the best place to hold service. But the circuit rider did not wait for Methodist families before he began his activities ; he announced preaching whether there were any Method- ists or not. As we glance over the names of the early circuits in the West, we notice that many of them were named after streams.® Of the nine circuits in the Western Conference “Autobiography of Joseph Tarkington,” pages 75, 85. °Minutes of Conferences, Vol. I. (1773-1828). The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 41 in 1800, eight of them were thus named. Every circuit in the Holston District in 1802 bore the name of a creek or river. The two earliest circuits in Ohio, the Miami and the Scioto, were located along the banks of those two rivers; and finally, when districts were laid out in Ohio, they were called the Miami and Muskingum. The same is true of Indiana. The two earliest Indiana circuits were the Whitewater and the Silver Creek, both named after streams; and later there were the Patoka and the Blue River Circuits, both located along the banks of the streams from which they received their names. The Holston Dis- trict in 1811 had four circuits named after rivers and three with names of valleys. The Cumberland the same year contained four circuits named after streams; the Nashville District had four similarly named, the Wabash District had two, the Kentucky District four, Salt River District two, the Mississippi District four, the Illinois District two, the Miami six, and the Muskingum District three. Of the nine districts of the Western Conference in 1811, every one had the name of a river except the Nash- ville. The earliest circuits in the West were either four., five., or six-weeks circuits—that is, it took the circuit rider that length of time to make the rounds of the circuit. In the year 1800 Henry Smith’s circuit covered all Southern Ohio between the Ohio and the Scioto Rivers. Benjamin Lakin the same year traveled a circuit in Northern Kentucky extending from Maysville to the Licking River, while the Secretary of the Conference, William Burke, traveled a circuit in Central Kentucky extending a hundred miles each way. James B. Finley’s first circuit, the Wills Creek, was four hundred and seventy-five miles around.” In 1804 a preacher was simply assigned to Illinois, while three years later another indefatigable circuit rider was sent to 7James B. Finley, “Autobiography,” page 193. 42 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Missouri as his circuit. Tobias Gibson traveled up and down the Lower Mississippi for several hundred miles, and Elisha Bowman covered a territory, after the Louisiana purchase, equally as large. Neither hardship nor distance deterred the preachers from carrying on the work to which they were assigned. Preaching appointments were generally for 12 o’clock, noon, on all days except the Sabbath.* The reason for this perhaps was that on a clear day everybody could tell by the sun when it was noon, for there were few clocks and fewer watches in a frontier community. The circuit rider, as a rule, preached at least once every day, and his advent into a community was the signal for a general turn-out of all Methodist families.° Many others also attended the meeting, even on week days, for all were always welcome. It was not an uncommon thing for men and women to walk five or six miles to attend class meeting, and at night the same distance to attend prayer meeting, lighting their way through the woods with blazing hickory bark. In summer men and boys attended the meetings in their bare feet, while the women and girls, if they possessed shoes and stockings, carried them in their hands until they came in sight of the place of meeting, then, washing off the dust in the nearest brook or spring, finished their toilets, that they might appear more decent in the company.”® The number attending the daily ministry of the circuit rider varied with the community and the time of year. Generally the service was held in a cabin, with a chair for a pulpit, while the congregation gathered about the preacher; and if it were summer time, half of the congre- gation would be on the outside. Sometimes the minister would stand in the doorway, while the people would be ®8Sweet, “Circuit Rider Days in Indiana,” page 48. *Williams, “Pictures of Early Methodism in Ohio,” pages 51-53. Tbid., pages 56 ff. The Frontier Circwit and the Circuit Rider. 43 gathered in the yard of the cabin. The great occasions were the quarterly meetings, when the sacraments were administered and love feasts held. These meetings be- gan on Friday evening or Saturday morning and lasted through until Monday morning. People came from twen- ty to thirty miles around. The neighborhood where the meeting was to be held made simple but ample provision for the entertainment. The larder was well filled with all the frontier staples, while pies and cakes were also pre- pared in abundance. On the Little Miami, in the early frontier days, it was customary to hold a certain quarterly meeting; and here three wealthy families did all the enter- taining, often each providing for as many as from fifty to a hundred people. At night the women were accommo- dated on the floor of the cabins, while men and boys re- paired to the barns, which had been swept and otherwise prepared for their entertainment. The preaching at a quarterly meeting occasion began on a Saturday morning, two sermons in succession being the order of the service. At night another preaching service was held, at which the junior preacher on the circuit usually held forth. But Sunday was the great day. First came the love feast conducted by one of the preachers, and following it at eleven o’clock came the sermon by the pre- siding elder, followed by a sermon from one of the circuit preachers. Following this the sacraments were adminis- tered, the Lord’s Supper and Baptism, while the meeting closed with a preaching and prayer service at night, some- times lasting, if the results warranted it, until near Mon- day morning. At this meeting the converts were gathered in, sometimes numbered by the score. The attendance at these meetings reached into the hundreds, and not infre- quently into the thousands. One of the typical presiding elders on the frontier in the early years of the nineteenth century was Samuel Par- 44 The kise of Methodism in the West. ker. A native of New Jersey, he began to preach in 1800. He came West and joined the Western Conference in 1805, his first circuit being the Hinkstone, in Kentucky. As presiding elder he served the Indiana, Kentucky, Miami, and Mississippi Districts. His career was cut short by death in 1819, while engaged on his district along the Mississippi. Parker was a tall, slim, awkward man, with large blue eyes and an enormous Roman nose. He had a long chin which he used in the winter to hold up the blanket which served him in lieu of a greatcoat. A hole was cut in the center of the blanket large enough to let his small head through, and when it was bitter cold he would hang the fore part of the hole on his chin and bid defiance to wind and cold. And when his bed covering proved insufficient, his blanket was made to serve that purpose; and it was frequently brought into use, for bed covering was scant, especially at quarterly meetings. Let us picture this homely, awkward frontier preacher, clad in ill-fitting, homespun preacher garb, as he conducts the preaching on a quarterly meeting occasion. He places his chair before him as his pulpit, and begins to read a hymn in a soft, charming voice. After the singing comes the prayer, which is uttered with such eloquence and pa- thos “that heaven and earth seem in juxtaposition.” And then follows the sermon on the text, “The upright shall love thee.” One who was present and heard this very ser- mon says: “I have since heard the most able divines in the country, but his description of the good man’s love to God and God’s love to man, I have not been privileged to hear equaled since, and indeed I never expect to hear anything this side of the throne of God which will surpass it.” Most of the early preachers in the West were unmarried men; and according to William Burke, the Secretary of 44Memorial sketch of the life of Samuel Parker, Minutes, Vol. I., pages 358, 359. 12Western Christian Advocate, Allen Wiley articles, 1845-46. The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 45 the Western Conference, he was the first preacher to travel as a married man west of the mountains. Not only were the circuit preachers unmarried, but Bishop Asbury as well as all of the bishops until Robert R. Roberts was elected in 1816 were likewise bachelors. When a preacher married he was usually advised to locate, for it was con- sidered impossible for a Western circuit to support a married preacher. Concerning the hardships which at- tended the first married circuit rider west of the moun- tains, we will let Burke speak :* “From the 9th of Janu- ary, 1796, I traveled as a married man, no allowance being made for the wife. Part of this time sixty-four dollars was allowed a traveling preacher, and he must find his own horse and fixins, his own wardrobe and that of his wife, together with her board; and the other part of the time it was eighty dollars, still nothing for wife. I was the first married preacher in the West who traveled after marrying. I met with every discouragement that could be thrown in my way. Preachers and people said, “You had better locate.’ I shared equally with the single men when they were on the circuit with me, in order to keep the peace. . . . One winter I had to use a borrowed blanket instead of a cloak or overcoat.” In the Journal of the Western Conference for 1803 is this entry: Benjamin Lakin’s account [of deficiency in his salary], $28.95. But it appears that the circuit maintained Brother Lakin’s wife and her beast gratis. It is therefore our opinion that it is un- generous in him to bring a demand on Conference; and seeing there are others more needy, it is our judgment that he ought not have anything. Jesse Walker’s account, $165.37. And it appears to us that $76 are for children. It is our judgment that the demand for children be deducted, and then he is deficient $89.37.74 13Finley, “Sketches of Western Methodism,” page 91. 144MS. Journal of the Western Conference for 1803. 46 The Rise of Methodism in the West. These two entries illustrate something of the discourage- ments which attended the path of the married circuit rider on the frontier. In 1809, the year James B. Finley began to preach, he was unable to find any place for his family to live on the circuit, and he was compelled to build a log cabin, 12x14, for their accommodation; but he states that it was “sufficiently capacious, as we had nothing but a bed and some wearing appearel. My funds being all exhaust- ed, I sold the boots off my feet to purchase provisions with.”?® The amount of salary allowed each preacher from 1784 to 1800 was $64, according to the provision of the Disci- pline. In 1792 traveling expenses were added to this sum. From 1800 to 1816 the salary allowed the traveling preachers was raised to $80 and traveling expenses; the same allowance was also made the wives of traveling preachers, while children up to seven years were allowed $16 each, and $24 from the age of seven to fourteen. In 1816 the salary was raised to $100.1° This salary was uniform for bishops, presiding elders, and circuit riders. In 1808 Bishop McKendree’s receipts and expenditures were as follows: From seven Conferences, $175; salary, $80; traveling and other expenses, $61.63; leaving $33.37, which the Bishop was particular in noting to be yet due the Conferences.” While this salary seems pitiably small, yet the preach- ers on the frontier had difficulty in collecting even this small amount. The Journals of the Western Conference for every year of its twelve years of history show long lists of deficiencies, and a considerable part of the business of each session consisted in dividing up the small amounts 16Finley, “Autobiography,” page 194. 1Hmory, “History of the Discipline,” pages 42, 237, 244, 7Methodist Review, 1871, pages 586, 587. The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 47 received from the Chartered Fund! and the Book Concern among the preachers who reported deficiencies. Thus in 1805 the deficiencies amounted to $985; to meet this $591 was obtained from the following sources: Collected from the Circuits................ $ 24 87 Draft on the Charter Fund................ 150 00 Draft on the Book Fund................... 300 00 Publick collection at Conference............. 51 50 Collection from the preachers at Conference. 55 25 Extra collection for Brother Bowman....... 10 00 Making’ a total. Of ss. ge.co dae cs kee yee cals $591 621° Certainly it was not a financial consideration which drew men into the traveling ministry of the Methodist Church in the frontier stage of its history. The poverty of the average frontier preacher is almost beyond our comprehension. Bishop Asbury states that at the session of the Western Conference in 1806 “the brethren were in want, and could not suit themselves; so I parted with my watch, my coat, and my shirt.’*° Although the Discipline called for traveling expenses and provision for the wife and children of a traveling preacher, yet, as Cartwright observes, “the Discipline was a dead letter on the subject of house rent, table expenses, and a dividend for children,” and it was not until 1813 that any provision was made for the care of the children of the preachers in the West; and 18The Chartered Fund originated at the General Conference of 1798. Previous to this there had been a Preacher’s Fund, created by the payment of every traveling preacher, on admission into full connection in the Conference, a sum of $5, and year after year an additional sum of $2. The Chartered Fund was con- tributed by friends, was funded under the direction of trustees, and the interest applied to meet the deficiencies and needs of preachers, their wives and children. (Emory, ‘History of the Discipline,” page 251. See also Finley, “Sketches of Western Methodism,” pages 50, 51.) MS. Journal, 1805. 20>Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III., page 206. 48 The Rise of Methodism in the West. then it was through the effort of Bishop Asbury, who, as Cartwright expressed it, “begged from door to door in the older Conferences and came on and distributed ten dollars to each child of a traveling preacher under four- teen years of age.’’*1 Peter Cartwright joined the West- ern Conference in 1804, and in 1807 he was compelled to return to the home of his father because he had no money nor clothes and he also lacked a horse, saddle, and bridle. On receiving a new outfit as a gift from his father he again set out for his circuit, “for another three years’ ab- sence.””?? Although the salary of a traveling preacher was meager in the extreme, yet even the amount which he received was not always paid in cash. A typical steward’s record for a circuit in Indiana in the early twenties shows that a good part of the “salary” was paid in cloth, corn, leath- er, socks, ete.: To cash received from Lewis’s class......... $ 0 50 To cash received from Curtis’s class.......... 50 To cash received from Connerville class..... 2 50 To cash received from Abbott’s class.......... 1 00 To cash received from Hardy’s class......... 87% Bridle leather from Hardy’s class........... 621% Cash from Tullis’s clasS...........cseeeeees 1 25 Shoe leather and corn from Tullis’s......... 1 75 Cash from Lower’s claSS...........eceeeeeee 2 561% 1 pair of shoe soles from Lower’s class...... 50 Cash from Robert’s class.................00. 4 65 Cash from Hardy’s claSS............c eee eueee 75 2% yards of linsey from Hardy’s class....... 112% Cash from Abbott’s clasS.............ceeeees 1 32 Cash from Curtis’s claSsS...........cecceeeee 50 7 yards of linen from Curtis’s............... 1 75 One small pair of shoes from Curtis’s....... 1 00 3% yards of linen from Alley’s class......... 1 25 2% yards of linsey from Alley’s class....... 1 25 8% yards of linsey from Lewis’s class....... 3 27 1 pair of socks from Lewis’s class........... 43% Cash from Grigg’s ClaSS..........ee ee eee eee 212% TORR . aa ik hh BER OU EEE SFE PS EE REE KO Se $36 12% “Cartwright, “Autobiography,” page 111, 2Tbid., pages 103-107. The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 49 The quarterage was applied as follows: By cash to A. Cummins, traveling expenses..$ 0 50 By cash J. Havens, traveling expemses....... 1 50 To A. Cummins, allowances...............6- 3 75 To J. Havens, allowances ...........eeeeeees 30 387% Total s.ceuis oaewuss kee dj ewatous wears Hae Res $36 121278 Among the common occurrences on a frontier circuit were the religious controversies. The salient points of Methodist theology were always emphasized in the preach- ing and prayers of the circuit rider. Nor were the Bap- tists, the Presbyterians, the Shakers, the New Lights any the less emphatic in emphasizing their peculiarities. In fact, the differences in doctrine had far greater emphasis laid upon them than in these days. The greatest opponents of Methodist theology were the Calvinists, as represented particularly by the Presbyte- rians. Some of the controversies with the Presbyterians were extremely bitter, rendered more so by the fact that the Presbyterian ministry were far better educated than were the Methodist preachers, and in consequence they assumed an arrogance in their discussions which the Methodists greatly resented. There are numerous in- stances, however, where Presbyterians and Methodists got on well together. Bishop Asbury was particularly friend- ly toward them, had numerous friends among the Presby- terian clergy, and frequently requested them to preach at Methodist meetings where he presided. Particularly was this true after the great revival in the West at the begin- ning of the nineteenth century, in which the Presbyterians and Methodists had drawn closer together.** 23Western Christian Advocate, November 21, 1860; article by F. C. Holliday. 247 dined with Mr. Ramsey, a Presbyterian minister, at his own house on Friday; and he with me to-day at my lodgings; we had quite a Christian interview.” (Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III., page 80.) At the Conference in Tennessee in 1802 Bishop 4 50 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Perhaps the most notorious controversy between Metb- odists and Presbyterians during the life of the Western Conference was one which occurred in Cincinnati follow- ing the session of the Conference in that city in 1811. While the Conference was in session three of the younger members, Peter Cartwright, Thomas Stilwell, and Samuel Griffin, took advantage of their stay in the city to have some pamphlets printed against Calvinism.?®> One of the pamphlets was in poetical form, or rather doggerel, and was entitled “The Dagon of Calvinism; or, The Molock of Decrees: A Poem in Three Cantos.” It had been written in New England by a man who had never been a Meth- odist, and was reprinted in Cincinnati without the knowl- edge or approval of the Conference. Cartwright states that his reason for printing the pamphlets was to answer pamphlets which had been circulated in Kentucky ridicul- ing and caricaturing Methodist doctrine. One such Pres- byterian pamphlet was entitled “A Dialogue between Cal- vinists and Arminians.” Another Presbyterian had writ- ten against Lorenzo Dow’s “Chain,” in which strong pre- destination sentiments were presented. In answer to these there had already appeared anonymously a pam- phlet entitled “A Useful Discovery; or, I Never Saw the Like Before,” which was a complete satire on Calvinist doctrine. This last pamphlet Cartwright and his associ- ates had reprinted at Cincinnati at the same time as “The Dagon of Calvinism.” Asbury was too sick to preach, and he asked two Presbyterian ministers to “supply my lack of public service, which they did with great fervency and fidelity.” (Journal, Vol. III., page 81.) Frequently Presbyterians offered their churches for Methodist meetings and not infrequently for Bishop Asbury to preach. 25An account of this controversy will be found in Williams’s “Pictures of Early Methodism in Ohio,’ Chap. VIII., pages 156- 186. Also in Cartwright’s “Fifty Years a Presiding Elder,” Chap, IV., pages 92-193, The Frontier Circwit and the Circuit Rider. BL This sorry controversial matter was soon thrown broad- cast over Southern Kentucky and created considerable stir in Presbyterian circles. The pastor of the First Pres- byterian Church in Cincinnati took the matter up and held the Western Conference as responsible. Letters were exchanged between him and the Methodist pastors of Cincinnati, which tended to increase the bitterness, while Cartwright received a long letter anonymously written— supposedly by two Presbyterian ministers—which pur- ports to be written by the devil. In this pamphlet Cart- wright is considered the devil’s faithful servant, because of his activity against Calvinist doctrine. To this pam- phlet Cartwright replied, addressing his letter “To the Right Honorable, The Devil,” and beginning, “If I am to answer a fool according to his folly, permit me to answer a devil according to his malice; therefore expect plain language.” The chief differences between Methodists and Baptists arose over the question of immersion as necessary to sal- vation and the Baptist practice of close communion. Cart- wright complains that the Baptists were great proselyters, and that after Methodists had begun a meeting in a wicked community the Baptists would then come and preach “Water!” “Water!” “Water!” and during the absence of the preachers at other points on the circuit they would attempt to rush the recent converts into the water. “They made so much ado about baptism by immersion,” he says, “that the uninformed would suppose that heaven was an island, and there was no way to get there but by diving or swimming.” But even Cartwright has a good word for some of the Baptist preachers and people on the frontier.*® Other sects with which the frontier Methodists came into contact and often conflict were the “Campbellites,”’ *6Cartwright, “Autobiography,” pages 133-138. For a good ex- ample of the type of controversy carried on between Methodists and Baptists see Cartwright’s ‘“‘Autobiography,” pages 150, 151, 52 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Universalists, and Shakers. All the Protestant denomi: nations joined in opposing the Universalists; in fact, op- position to Universalist doctrine was about the only com- mon theological ground on which the several sects could stand. Debates on religious and theological subjects were commonly held, continuing night after night while the people gathered in great crowds to support their particular theological champion. A certain debate in Indiana be- tween a Methodist and Universalist in the early day last- ed three days. In the course of the debate the Universalist painted a hell for the Methodist champion and his breth- ren to look at, and then flung into it all the human race that orthodoxy excluded from heaven. The Methodist replied by sending Judas to heaven before his Lord and carried all liars, lechers, seducers, and murderers to Abraham’s bosom, “all bedeviled and unrepentent as they were.” The Shakers were a communistic sect very active in Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana in the early years of the nineteenth century. They did not recognize marriage as a Christian institution and held to other strange notions. The Methodist circuit rider was a deadly enemy of this delusion and took every opportunity of openly opposing them. From the Methodist standpoint they seemed the very outcast among the sects. There was a settlement of Shakers on the Lower Wabash, in Indiana, at a place called Busroe.27 To this settlement had come Kentucky immigrants, among whom were Methodists, Baptists, and Cumberland Presbyterians. Some of them had joined the Shakers, while others remained steadfast to their former faith. Cartwright came over from Kentucky to this set- tlement for the purpose of saving the remaining Method- ists from falling into “the muddy pools of Shakerism.” On arriving in the settlement he challenged the Shaker 2"The Shakers were officially known as “The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Coming.” The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 53 “priests” to a debate, but no one answered the challenge. The meeting, however, was held, nevertheless, and for three hours Cartwright held forth, “until the very foun- dations of every Shaker present were shaken from under him.” As a result of this meeting forty-seven former Shakers gave their names to the Methodist Church and a class was immediately organized.”® Such contests developed a remarkable quickness of wit among the frontier preachers. At New Harmony, on the Lower Wabash in Indiana, there had been established a communistic community by the Rappites, a German sect. Later the Rappites sold out their interest to Robert Owen, a Scotch mill owner, who was interested in founding a socialistic community. On one occasion a Methodist cir- cuit rider was preaching in the hall at New Harmony, which was open to all denominations or to any one who had any message to give. It was the custom of a certain member of the community to rise in the meeting and ques- tion the speakers. He accordingly arose while James Armstrong, a Methodist preacher, was preaching and pro- pounded the question, “How do you know you have a soul?” To this Armstrong replied, “I feel it.” “Did you ever smell, taste, see, or hear your soul?” said the ques- tioner. “No,” said Armstrong. “Then you have four senses against you,” replied the skeptic. Armstrong then propounded this question to his questioner: “Mr. Jen- nings, did you ever have the toothache?” “Yes,” said Jennings. “Did you ever smell, taste, see, or hear the toothache?” asked the preacher. “No,” replied Jennings. “Then,” said Armstrong, “you have four senses against you.”29 It is generally supposed that the early Methodist preachers, particularly in the West, were very ignorant men, and it is true that many of them lacked school edu- 28Cartwright, pages 53-55, 2°Autobiography of Rev. Joseph Tarkington, 104, 54 The Rise of Methodism im the West. cation ; but to say that they were ignorant men is far from the truth. They were uneducated in the sense in which Abraham Lincoln was an uneducated man; but, like Lin- coln, they became trained men in the truest sense of the word. Bishop Asbury was not a college-bred man, but he was far from being an uneducated or unlearned preacher. He was constantly occupied with some book.*®° He always carried books in his saddlebags, as did all the circuit rid- ers. The list of books which he found time to read as he rode from place to place is a long one, and contains not only books on religious subjects, but also history, biogra- phy, literature, and even books on medicine. While the education of the average circuit rider was extremely lim- ited, yet somehow they became efficient interpreters of a larger life, and as a class developed a keenness of mind and a readiness of wit that finds few equals. They were men of few books, but they absorbed the few they pos- sessed. The books with which they became most familiar were the Bible, the Discipline, Wesley’s Sermons, and Fletcher’s “Appeal.” The eloquence of these pioneers was not the kind learned in schools or from the study of books. There is no better way to account for it than to let John Strange, a prince among Western preachers, tell of the school in which he learned it. His Alma Mater, said he, was “Brush College, more ancient, though less pretentious, than Yale, Harvard, or Princeton. Here I graduated, and I love her memory still. Her academic groves are the boundless forests and prairies of these Western wilds; her Pierian springs are the gushing fountains from the rocks and mountain fastnesses; her Arcadian groves and Orphic songs are the wildwoods, and the birds of every color and every song, relieved now and then with the bass hootings “Tipple, “Francis Asbury, the Prophet of the Long Road,” pages 90-106. The author here gives a list of the books read and studied by Asbury, with his comments upon them. The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 55 of the night owl and the weird treble of the whippoorwill; her curriculum is the philosophy of nature and the mys- teries of redemption; her library is the word of God, the Discipline, the hymn book, supplemented with trees and brooks and stones, all of which are full of wisdom and sermons and speeches; and her parchments of literary honors are the horse and the saddlebags.’*+ The type of preaching practiced by the early circuit riders in the West is hard to define. The general concep- tion of Methodist preaching of the time seems to be that it was wild and incoherent, with little that appealed to thinking people. This may have been true of the preach- ing of a few, but it could hardly be considered character- istic. The preachers were often vigorous and noisy, but most of them had regard for the decencies of public wor- ship and did not countenance the extravagant. As a rule preaching was of a doctrinal character. They believed and preached the doctrine of the fall of man; all men were conceived and born in sin, and Jesus Christ died for all, with the emphasis upon the “all.” This was by way of contrast with the Calvinists, who preached a limited salvation. They also emphasized the doctrine of per- sonal responsibility. ‘They proclaimed the “free will” of the individual, that every person had the power of choice. “So then every one of us must give an account of himself to God,” was a favorite text of the circuit preacher, and many a reckless frontiersman has quailed under the burning sermons preached from that text. Then they bore down upon the doctrine of regenera- tion also, that the soul can be newly created and transformed; and this was not simply a change of purpose, but a change of character. This was conver- *1For a description of John Strange and his method of preach- ing see an article by W. C. Smith on “John Strange at Camp- Meetings,” Western Christian Advocate, June 23, 1858; also J. C. Smith, “Early Methodism in Indiana,” pages 38, 39. 56 The Rise of Methodism in the West. sion, the “new birth” of which Methodists had much to say, and taught it on all occasions, as necessary for entrance into the kingdom. They preached also that conversion must be manifested and become a matter of one’s own personal consciousness. “Being faithful” was the term which summed up for the Methodists correct living; and the opposite, “backsliding,”’ was a term which described the state of a Methodist who, having once been “converted,” had failed “to be faith- ful.’ The preaching of these rude preachers was abundantly practical and touched the life of the com- munity at every point. Frontier Methodists were extremely fond of hymn- singing; they sang hymns in their homes, about their work, at their family altars, as well as in their meet- ings. The Methodists had an official Hymn Book dating from the organization of the Church, in 1784; but there were few of these books on the frontier, except with the preachers. Frequently no one in a congregation possessed a hymn ‘book except the preach- er, who gave out the verses to be sung, two lines at a time. Many of the hymns, however, were well known, and except in the public congregation were sung with- out the process of being lined out. Aside from the hymns found in the Church hymnal there grew up on the frontier a great number of improvised hymns. At the beginning of a camp meeting the regular hymns would be sung; but as the meeting warmed up hymns, or “spiritual songs,” as they were termed, many times improvised by the preachers on ‘the spot, were used. These songs were very imperfect in rhyme, rude in ex- pression, and to us to-day seem totally impossible; but they were learned by the people and often used in place of the older and more worthy hymns. Many of these frontier hymns have been lost, for some of them never appeared in print, but a few have come The Frontier Circuit and the Circuit Rider. 57 down to us, preserved in an old song book, first printed in 1810. Two of the frontier preachers who obtained a reputation as song writers were John A. Grenade and Caleb J. Taylor, both of whom wrote a number of hymns found in this little volume. The theme of these crude frontier hymns varied. Sometimes they described a camp meeting scene, as does this song written by Taylor: Sinners through the camp are falling, Deep distress their souls pervade, Wondering why they are not rolling In the dark infernal shade. Grace and mercy, long neglected, Now they ardently implore; In an hour when least expected Jesus bids them weep no more. Hear them then their God extolling, Tell the wonders he has done; While they rise, see others falling! Light into their hearts hath shone. Prayer and praise, and exhortation, Blend in one perpetual sound; Music sweet beyond expression, To rejoicing saints around.*? More often, however, the theme of these camp meeting songs was “divine mercy” or “saving grace,” of which the following by John A. Grenade is a sample: Think of what your Saviour bore In the gloomy garden, Sweating blood at every pore, To procure thy pardon; See Him stretched upon the wood, Bleeding, grieving, crying; Suffering all the wrath of God, Groaning, gasping, dying. 32¢The Early Camp-Meeting Song Writers,” by Fry, Methodist Review, 1859, pages 401-413. CHAPTER IV. THE CIRCUIT RIDER AS A FACTOR IN FRONTIER SOCIETY. ALL historians recognize the importance of the ac- tivities of the Jesuits in the early history of Canada, and the Great Lakes region of the United States par- ticularly. Their story has been admirably told by one of America’s greatest historians, Francis Park- man; while the documents relating to their activities have been gathered together by another American his- torian, Reuben Gold Thwaites, in that remarkable series of volumes known as the “Jesuit Relations.” The equally important activities of the early circuit riders in the West, however, have as yet received little recognition from historians; while the documents re- lating to their labors have been scattered to the four winds and the complete story of their lives and work remains yet to be written A distinguished jurist, a Judge of the Supreme Court in one of the Central West- ern States, was accustomed to say years ago, “But for the Methodist Church and the Methodist ministry, this country would have sunk into barbarism.” While this assertion may be somewhat too sweeping in all its im- plications, yet an examination of the activities and in- fluences which emanated from the Methodist Church on the frontier in the latter years of the eighteenth and the early years of the nineteenth centuries will go far toward substantiating the declaration. It has only +Perhaps the best appreciation of frontier Methodism written by a non-Methodist appeared in the French Revue des Deux Mondes, by M. Cucheval-Clevigny, which was translated and pub- lished in the Methodist Review (1854, pages 556, 577; 1855, pages 69-88). The original articles in the French Revue appeared soon after the publication of Cartwright’s “Autobiography.” The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 59 been in recent years, however, that the historian has cven begun to give credit to the rude preachers of right- eousness on the frontier. Recently American history text- books have been published in which Cartwright’s “Auto- biography” and Brunson’s “Western Pioneer” have been cited as reading references. As has already been pointed out, the Methodist plan of organization was exactly suited to a new country and a scattered population. Frontier society was in a state of flux, but the ministers of the Methodist Church were equally mobile and were just as much at home whether society were on the move or stationary. It seems probable that no other system could have met the conditions; at least no other did. The circuit rider was equally at home in the saddle, in the rude cabin of the settler, in the Indian lodge, or out under the wide-spreading branches of the beeches and maples. He worked at his never-ending task not for personal glory or for “salary,” but for the glory of God and the spread of the gospel. Often he reached the emigrant before the roof was on his cabin or the clay in the stick chimney dry. The whole Western country was laid out into circuits and districts, and into each ob- scure settlement came at stated times the circuit rider, at longer intervals came the presiding elder, and once each year, into the Western country, came the bishop, preaching, ordaining, and holding the sacraments. And to the camp meetings, the quarterly meetings, and the Conferences flocked the people of the frontier. They often came long distances, on foot, in their rude wag- ons, on horseback, men, women, and children. What was the influence upon Western society exerted by these devoted men, organized as they were into an effective machine for spreading the gospel? It goes almost without saying that they exerted a powerful influence for religion and righteousness. They preached a theology greatly 60 The Rise of Methodism in the West. needed in a new country, infested, as all new countries are, with rough and many times criminal characters. The great doctrine, urged on all occasions, was that of “conversion,” a change of life and heart. They pro- claimed all men to be sinners and that salvation lay only through Jesus Christ. It was an extremely prac- tical gospel they proclaimed; a gospel which manifested itself in the daily life of the convert. It was “by their fruits” they were known, and thus in a rough and rude community they brought the softening influences of Christianity. The circuit rider was also a powerful influence in maintaining law and order. He always had the great- est respect for law, both of the Church, of the State, and of the nation. The Methodist system of Church government, devised by John Wesley and brought to America by Francis Asbury, was a most thorough and efficient system. Asbury was not so great a preacher as he was an organizer; and he stood always for obe- dience to the laws of the Church.? Order was his pas- sion, and the introduction of such an orderly system into more or less disorderly communities must have had far-reaching influence. The circuit rider stood for decency and order in public worship, and many times took the leading part in preserving it. Of one of the presiding elders on the frontier it has been said by one who knew him that “he would not suffer anything which was manifestly enthusiastic or extravagant in religious assemblies to pass without rebuke. . . . His nice sense of propriety induced him to keep the very best order at the meetings superintended by him. At many a camp meeting the preachers were compelled to resort to force to preserve order. The following ac- *Tipple, “Francis Asbury, the Prophet of the Long Road,” pages 241, 242. The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 61 count of such a scene is typical. At a camp meeting near Marietta, Ohio, in the fall of 1806 a crowd of “rabble and rowdies,” as Cartwright describes them, came on a Sunday morning, “armed with dirks, clubs, knives, and horsewhips, and swore they would break up the meeting.” While Cartwright was preaching, one of the rowdies stood up on a seat and began to talk and laugh. The preacher ordered him down, but with oaths he refused. The magistrates were afraid to ar- rest the roughs, so the preachers were compelled to in- terfere. After a general scuffle, in which the friends of law and order stood by the preachers, the roughs were put to flight, though not until some thirty had been captured, and on Monday nearly three hundred dollars was collected in fines and costs.’ Nor is this an unusual circumstance. Finley de scribes a similar scene where “about twenty lewd fel- lows of the baser sort’ came to a camp meeting intoxi- cated, with the avowed purpose of breaking up the meeting, but only to find that the preachers and the Methodist brethren were more than their match.* Not only did the circuit rider stand for law and or- der, but he also stood for moderation in religious prac- tices. It has been the general conception that the early frontier preachers desired to work the people up to a state of religious frenzy at every meeting, and that they took special delight in such strange exercises as the ‘Serks,” the “holy laugh,” the “barking exercise,” and that they encouraged trances and visions; but this is an entire misconception. None of the preachers ob- jected to hearty shouts during their preaching, but there were few fanatics among them, and what few of that sort did creep into the ministry were soon weeded out *Cartwright, ‘‘Autobiography,” pages 90-92. ‘Finley, “Autobiography,” page 252, 62 The Rise of Methodism in the West. by the watchful presiding elders. At a certain camp meeting conducted in the West “there were many .. . strange and wild exercises into which the subjects of this revival fell; such, for instance, as . . . the running, jumping, and barking exercise. The Methodist preachers generally preached against this extravagant wildness.” Cartwright states: “I did it uniformly in my ministra- tions, and sometimes gave great offense.’”® Western morality was extremely loose, and in many communities little attempt was made to preserve order or uphold decent morality by the civil authorities. “Trav- elers from the East were shocked at the balls, the drinking, the fighting, and the utter disregard paid to the Sabbath day. Good people were terrified at the drunkenness, the vice, the gambling, the brutal fights, the gouging, the needless duels they beheld on every hand.”*® In the face of this looseness the Methodist Church maintained and proclaimed an unbending moral- ity. The circuit rider waged war with vice of every sort. Not content with renouncing sin in general, he often came to particulars, called out names in meeting, de- nounced sinners to their very face, and called upon them to repent. The Methodist Church was the original Temperance Society in the West, if not in the nation. The General Rules formulated by John Wesley were adopted by the American Church at its organization in 1784. Among them was one forbidding “drunkenness, buy- ing or selling of spirituous liquors, or drinking them, un- less in cases of necessity.”’ In addition to this rule the American Church adopted another, forbidding members from distilling grain into liquor and advised the preachers strongly to persuade their members from drinking drams. *Cartwright, “Autobiography,” pages 51, 52. °McMaster, Vol. II., pages 152, 578. "Emory, “History of the Discipline,” pages 181, 192, The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 63 Temperance was a theme unheard and unthought of outside the pale of the Methodist Church. No other Church had legislation covering the subject, but it was left to the individual to use bis discretion regard- ing the matter. As a result of the attitude toward liquor taken by the Methodist Church, and the fact that the other Churches had nothing to say upon the subject, it followed “as a necessary consequence that all persons who refused to drink were called, by way of reproach, Methodist fanatics.”* The strange doctrine of antino- mianism® had early gained foothold in the West and had been fostered by Church organizations and de- fended from the pulpit. This doctrine was preached particularly by certain branches of the Baptists. Moral reform they proclaimed as a presumptuous intermed- dling with the Divine plans. Alcohol was termed a “ood creature of God to be received with thanksgiv- ing.”’° A certain prominent preacher of the anti-means doctrine destroyed the confidence of this flock in his sincerity by erecting lightning rods on his buildings. He saw no need of “means” to save his soul, but did to save his oats and buckwheat. At one time on the frontier at a certain Church meeting of an antinomian congregation one member was expelled for habitual drunkenness and another for being a member of a tem- perance society, which led a too curious member to ask, “How much liquor must he drink to retain his standing in the Church, since drinking too much and drinking none at all were both capital crimes?” At the time the Methodist Church was established in the West practically every one drank liquor. “Ardent ®Finley, “Autobiography,” page 249. °An “antinomian” is one who maintains that under the gospel dispensation the moral law is of no use or obligation, on the ground that faith alone is necessary to salvation. °Methodist Review, April, 1857, pages 287, 288, 64 The Rise of Methodism in the West. spirits were used as a preventive of disease. It was also regarded as a necessary beverage. A house could not be raised, a field of wheat could not be cut down, nor could there be a log-rolling, a husking, a quilting, a wedding, or a funeral without the aid of alcohol.”™ Cartwright adds his testimony to the prevalence of liquor-drinking on the frontier: “From my earliest rec- ollection drinking drams, in family and social circles, was considered harmless and allowable socialities. It was almost universally the custom for preachers, in common with all others, to take drams; and if a man would not have it in his family, his harvest, his house- raisings, log-rollings, weddings, and so on, he was con- sidered parsimonious and unsociable; and many, even professors of Christianity, would not help a man if he did not have spirits and treat the company.”? The difficulty of transporting grain to market over the rough frontier roads led the farmers to distill it into whisky. Whisky-making was very common in the West in the early days. In 1810 there were twenty-eight distilleries in Indiana territory, turning out 35,950 gal- lons® of whisky a year, to say nothing of the domestic distilleries where whisky was made for home consump- tion. It was the prevailing opinion on the frontier that whisky was a preventive of the diseases common to the frontier,’* such as ague and fever, and great quantities were consumed, avowedly for that purpose. Distilled liquors were continually in use as tonics, even among those who were otherwise strictly temperate and ab- stemious. A certain local preacher in Tennessee was accused “Finley, “Autobiography,” page 248. Cartwright, “Autobiography,” page 212. 13Logan Esarey, “History of Indiana” (Indianapolis, 1915), Vol. I., page 179. 14Williams, ‘‘Methodism in Ohio,” page 25. The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 65 of drinking too much at weddings. After much difficul- ty the circuit preacher succeeded in getting a committee of local preachers, who themselves were not dram drink- ers, to try the accused brother. Testimony was given proving that he drank often and had been drunk on several occasions, and accordingly he was suspended until the next Quarterly Conference, when he was ex- pelled from the Church. Finley states that “I suffered no opportunity to pass that I did not improve in por- traying the physical, social, and moral evils resulting from intemperance. . . . Frequently I would pledge whole congregations, standing upon their feet, to the temperance cause.”?® Among the frontier preachers none were more famous for opposition to intemperance than James Axley. Ax- ley and Peter Cartwright were close friends, they hav- ing been admitted into the Western Conference the same year, and were alike in their fearless denunciation of whatever they believed to be wrong. At one time he was located in Eastern Tennessee, a country known for its production of peach brandy and for the free use of it. In opposition to this practice he preached what became known as Axley’s temperance sermon, which was famous in all that region for a third of a century. A passage from this sermon will serve to illustrate a type of frontier preaching, as well as the strong oppo- sition of the Methodist Church toward intemperance: Text: “Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil; the Lord reward him according to his works.” (2 Tim. iv. 14.) Paul was a traveling preacher, and a bishop, or a presiding elder at least; for he traveled extensively, and had much to do, not only in regulating the societies, but also in sending the preach- ers here, there, and yonder. He was zealous, laborious, would not build on another man’s foundation, but formed new circuits, 18Cartwright, “Autobiography,” pages 184-186, 16Rinley, “Autobiography,” page 250. 5 66 The Rise of Methodism in the West. “where Christ was not named,” so that from Jerusalem, and round unto Illyricum, he had fully preached the gospel of Christ. One new place that he visited was very wicked. . . . Sabbath- breaking, dancing, drinking, quarreling, fighting, swearing, etc., abounded; but the word of the Lord took effect; there was a powerful stir among the people, and many precious souls were converted. Among the subjects of that work there was a certain noted character, Alexander by name and a still-maker by trade; also Hymenzus, who was his partner in the business. Paul formed a new society, and appointed Brother Alexander class leader. There was a great change in the place; the people left off their drinking, swearing, fighting, horse-racing, dancing, and all their wicked practices. The stills were worked up into bells and stew-kettles, and thus applied to useful purposes. The settle- ment was orderly, the meetings were prosperous, and things went well among them for some time. But one year they had a pleasant spring; there was no late frost, and the peach crop hit exactly. I do suppose, my brethren, that such a crop of peaches was never known before. The old folks ate all they could eat; the children ate all they could eat; the pigs ate all they could eat; the sisters preserved all they could preserve; and still the limbs of the trees were bending and breaking. One Sunday when the brethren met for worship they gathered around outside the meetinghouse, and got to talking about their worldly business —as you know people sometimes do, and it is a mighty bad practice—and one said to another, ‘Brother, how is the peach crop with you this year?” “Oh,” said he, “you never saw the like; they are rotting on the ground under the trees; I don’t know what to do with them.” “How would it do,” said one, “to still them? The peaches will go to waste, but the brandy will keep; and it is very good in certain cases, if not used to excess.” “I should like to know,” said a cute brother, “how you could make brandy without stills?” “That’s nothing,” replied another, “for our class leader, Brother Alexander, is as good a still-maker as need be, and Brother Hymeneus is another, and, rather than see the fruit wasted, no doubt they will make us a few.” The next thing heard on the subject was a hammering in the class leader’s shop; and soon the stills in every brother’s orchard were smok- ing and the liquid poison streaming. When one called on another, the bottle was brought out, with the remark, “I want you to taste my new brandy; I think it is pretty good.” The guest after tast- ing once was urged to repeat, when, smacking his lips, he would reply: “Well, it’s tolerable; but I wish you would come over and The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 67 taste mine; I think mine is a little better.” So they tasted and tasted till many of them got about half drunk, and I don’t know but three-quarters. Then the very devil was raised among them; the society was all in an uproar, and Paul was sent for to come and settle the difficulty. At first it was difficult to find sober, disinterested ones enough to try the guilty; but finally he got his committee formed; and the first one he brought to account was Alexander, who pleaded not guilty. He declared he had not tasted, bought, sold, or distilled a drop of brandy. “But,” said Paul, “you made the stills, otherwise there would have been no liquor made; and if no liquor, no one would have been intoxi- cated.” So they expelled him first, then Hymenzus next, and went on for compliment, till the society was relieved of all still- makers, distillers, dramsellers, and dram-drinkers, and peace was once more restored. Paul says: “Holding faith, and a good con- science; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck: of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.”?” Frontier Methodism had a very large social influence. Once a week the class leaders called their classes to- gether, and there the New Englander and the South- erner, “the Yorker” and the Eastern Shore man, the Teuton and the Celt mingled on a platform of exact equality. The class leader was a neighbor and friend, and freely and frankly they discussed their religious convictions, their fears and hopes together. They spoke and sang and prayed, and thus sectional prejudices passed and there was born a distinct Western spirit and feeling. These class meetings were the smallest of the Methodist gatherings. Then there were the preaching services when the circuit preacher reached the neighbor- hood and greater numbers gathered together; and the quarterly meetings, when sometimes as many as two thousand people gathered to spend two days in religious and social intercourse. Still more extensive was the mingling, when in the autumn the camp meetings began. Nearly every circuit planned such a gathering, when ‘Finley, “Sketches of Western, Methodism,” pages 237, 238. 68 The Rise of Methodism in the West. people from far and near came, lived in booths and tents, and spent their time in delightful mingling to- gether. Methodism on the frontier proved a wonderful “social chemistry.” Indeed, no other influence on the frontier had larger social possibilities.** Another aspect of the social influence of frontier Methodism deserves mention. The preacher lived in the homes of the people. He passed the night in the home where he preached, or in the neighborhood. Entirely aside from the religious influences which emanated from such visits were his example as a studious man and a gentleman. The casual conversations carried on at the table with the elder members of the household; the read- ing and praying about the open fireplace just before retiring and just after rising; the books he brought into the log cabins—all these were fruitful sources of in- fluencing especially the younger members of the house- hold. The early Methodist circuit riders were not only preachers, but they were likewise book agents. The Gen- eral Conference of 1800 passed this rule: “It shall be the duty of every presiding elder, where no book stew- ard is appointed, to see that his district be fully sup- plied with books. He is to order such books as are wanted, and to give directions to whose care the same are to be sent; and he is to take the oversight of all our books sent into his district, and to account to the superintendent for the same.” It stated further: “It shall be the duty of every preacher who has the charge of a circuit to see that his circuit be duly supplied with books, and to take charge of all the books which are sent to him, from time to time, or which may be in his 1*Rev. T. M. Eddy, “Influence of Methodism upon the Civili- zation and Education of the West,” Methodist Review, April, 1857, pages 280-296. The Circuit Rider in Frontier Society. 69 circuit; and he is to account with the presiding elder for the same.”!® These books, of course, were mainly publications of the Methodist Book Concern, but they were books on a variety of subjects, such as biography, history, travel, philosophy, and ethics, as well as the Methodist “stand-bys,” the works of Wesley, Fletcher, Clarke, Bangs, and Lee. At this early date there were no Methodist journals. The Western Christian Advo- cate began publication in 1834, while the Methodist Mag- azine did not begin operation until 1818. There were few cabins on the frontier where reading matter was abundant. The cares of pioneer life and its hardships had largely destroyed the opportunity for cultural pursuits and there was very little demand for books. But the Methodist preachers resolutely carried books to the people and in most cases actually crowded them upon the settler. Many a frontier cabin would have been without a single book if some circuit rider had not insisted that books be purchased. This was a part of the preacher’s duty, and most of the preachers were faithful in its performance. Among old collections of books, volumes may still be found bearing upon the flyleaf “Bought of Rev. ——————, May ——, 18——, Price $ .’? The books were read in the household, then were loaned to the neighbors until they made the circuit of the settiement. The Western preachers were deeply interested in edu- cation, even though they themselves were generally un- schooled men. As a testimony to this interest was Bethel Academy, erected in Jessamine County, Ken- tucky, in the latter years of the eighteenth century. It was the second institution of learning founded by Methodists in the United States. The Academy, built entirely by subscriptions obtained from the Western Emory, “History of the Discipline,” pages 258, 259. 70 The Rise of Methodism in the West. circuits, originated with Bishop Asbury and Francis Poythress and certain leading laymen of the region. The building erected was eighty by forty, and three stories high. It was designed to serve as a dormitory as well as for recitations and chapel. The Kentucky legislature thought well enough of the project to grant the institution six thousand acres of land. The people were generous to the limit of their ability, and for a time the school attracted numbers of students; but it proved poorly located, and there were few to patronize the school. The frontier was extremely poor, and finally it was deemed best to abandon it. It was not long, however, until Bethel Academy was followed by numer- ous successors, and in the first half of the nineteenth century many colleges and academies sprang up, founded by Methodist Conferences, in the States which once com- posed the Western Conference.”° Another achievement of Methodism on the frontier was that it trained laymen in the art of public speaking and public leadership as perhaps nothing else was able to do. The local preachers and class leaders were cho- sen from among the more talented and better prepared of the members of the Church, and thus they received training for general political and social leadership. It was no mere accident that a local preacher, Edward Tiffin, became the first governor of the State of Ohio, and it is not strange that Peter Cartwright developed political ambitions. “Finley, “Sketches of Western Methodism,” pages 42, 43. PART II. THE JOURNAL. ( ‘ i Sree f tha pe ee at Be fbae Chahit Lecansbar Tames Catihis J tabs a! bichated Patties dam Thine Cclsen, afc Re Mla Ue Manoir {2 Shwial Are Hal, Zz Aha hatin, 2 Ail Pour olirety: Z Willan Burk, 8 reflec hihi .« & Peewinee Mebane; a Poengeemem Youngs Wenry Sans PKy -.-2 Lertes Floyd, - fikn Jale,.. . 2 Leuthes Tay tas toe too 0 Ltn Boge, .. 2 eh aeaints Blah rams: = 7 A. lie Garielt,...2 Rthh oli fetch, Ey, ie aS ipa Those hartied bas ere tet fresinte Mike one teesvcet om Foyt tLe’ Sach Grong, Album trideh fctn, IGS Leapick, $f at iherssfemet Genin: Leven Bmeye Those Marler NY Lad,“ IAL: Bree ah farmiliesuke ofian x flaw eeohin, engage Hees Serre for His Year, laity, - fhe Somme Ura, ann Oke tien to Cnt ne Mier Serer, fearrrciaal oes eel Jaron The ton ference, frecaectic te Lick, Wham Me ers clase, Blbtcm Paark, She Baye, and Stkn Wetsrn, HK bom mie, Sf Loos? Wha au O20 aimed Beacoro a” this tompsrene! trot Le Watts , DBerfarnvn Mikaen Fitim fora att, Wenay Jonen, Ke Corflrionct faresscan te The ints Consterain, he Criiial, ota? Sat f anaceinla ety, wtih Frances Deythiee, at freaint” od on. eA Ro Gest ea Aig fig oe Kee BonmecLgn feat hes Bint Jin oterty Comeermect. 541 Ket OGFCAL anced webatt.. ant Hirafke Deortis Mal Kes Hane Shatl Slap ot om Gewt Speer rinl are ial He aL fae 2 prypovinatte Led toni on Ma, Mester lm fire ctyaa Fea Je fart, ancl farts bo bo ter Keren Sik hee 25 met Anak Sha Ll be fo KL Til gm fie forn aia of Vita Con fer nce, Lb5 Hie Fags furfere. Sar CF) BLe2 ie Mala tormtti, Sh bo offnrillat powell on Me ae yen Hy Fant Lat on Bxtichy, 4 tno @ Ki Coignye of helt eas en LE Meh anol Hil they ant aeicetent % at on bap Poe son tins ot Me Leal by Lon. Niiiaam fe. felis , PLE crw fBucl, Lecerer Gant, ancl faipnidl BK, of fr, be BE bomen (in Welion Bestegrca, Ha” Schon Bape, Fhermae Veiibiriory amc yteem ill del from a Committe, te Brolin, Me Mert ferent Gynt Lorigf atest pt ant libel £ Me Aiurgiees, of He Mithectist; Thating Bowatlin Aaabiitte, zz Gill Hida Lovettr nat of/ ati Jie omorey te Khe cost of Ke The their Chur ek; Tle Cow Lreree fpeactscti te Grammme te oli fueeneiss fa (oneae bere, Cegetcak Harriman... $47 y — Durfamur Lihon,..f 510Gb Welliaon Purk,. 6.G/ WE Gel Celie ae BH Ii Fracrscis Bry Ho Wb 9 IES ae 165 4 ti Lt Mefew af Hc Commrctte- of Ce enya Pat by Ke freacher ts Her forncl, en Distitheiel ad Kollrrees ae Kh Flamees filer... --E0 00 Berfarmen Lahin Ky 10 Hiich elas Ir lbre, ee 13 woo Setear Gulton,..../41 8 Millicom Burk... 3/ 00 Ropcheal Yorriman, | 00 Francie Beythafs, 20 00 Ke IpZeamangy = / 11.00 Sees & gh 3 "90 ay aba Crurce of Hes Yuas, fiaich 2 Iaancis payBliye teed 13.1 69 anct Fe atc ofp biel fi met, te Ka Sone fier forw BGS oe Ki lias O Laer (F 11 FO GIL Bee £6 1) 60 Go “Gor —————OOaeSsa— 00 Luther one whe, Aelt ben fiat Corifeant be hell Grr Be ewe Op ir Marstichy, CFG 2" 603. Milian Ton be Feat Foariveie NOY, I. JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN ANNUAL CONFERENCE, HELD AT BETHEL ACADEMY, KENTUCKY, OCTOBER 6, 1800.* Members present, Francis Asbury, Richard Whatcoat, William McKendree, William Burk, John Sale, Heze- kiah Harriman, Benjamin Lakin; readmitted, Lewis Hunt, Thomas Allin, Jeremiah Lawson. Who are admitted on trial? William Marsh, Benja- min Young. What local preachers are elected to the office of dea- cons? Ansr. Richard Tilton, Edward Talbot, William Thompson, Isaac Pavey, Rubin Hunt, Elisha Bowman, Jacob James, A. Blackman, Jonathan Kidwell, Benja- min Northcot, Joshu West, James Garner, Jesse Griffith, Philip Taylor. Who have located this year? Ansr. Thomas Allin. Benjamin Lakin, Jeremiah Lawson, Lewis Hunt, and Thomas Allin, Ordained to the Office of Deacons. The Preachers’ deficiencies for Six Months are as fol- lows: £ $s D £ S$ D William Burk ....... 2 17 6 Hezekiah Harriman.. 7 19 0 John Sale ........... 6 16 6 Lewis Hunt......... 0 18 2 Jeremiah Lawson.... 5 15 7 ‘Benjamin Young ....3 5 6 Thomas Allin ....... 11 20 —_ — - —- — - 12 2 8 £26 11 7 26 11 7 £38 14 3 Conference Adjourned, to meet again at Ibenezer, State of Tennessee, October 1, 1801. Test. Wituiam Burg, Secretary. F. Aspury. Nore 1.—Bishop Asbury crossed over the mountains from Vir- ginia to attend this session of the Western Conference. He left his horse and carriage east of the mountains and borrowed a 74 The Rise of Methodism in the West. horse to ride to Kentucky. On September 27 he speaks of climb- ing the steeps of Clinch and sleeping that night on the Cumber- land. On October 2 they crossed the Kentucky River, and on October 3 reached Bethel, where the Conference was to be held. The minutes are dated the 6th, but Asbury speaks of Bishop Whatcoat and William McKendree preaching at Bethel on the 3d. Of Bethel Academy he has the following to say: “Here is Bethel —Cokesbury in miniature, eighty by thirty feet, three stories, with a high roof, and finished below. Now we want a fund and an income of 300 per year to carry it on—without which it will be useless. But it is too distant from public places, its being surrounded by the river Kentucky in part, we now find to be no benefit; thus all our excellencies are turned to defects. Perhaps Brother Poythress and myself were as much overseen with this place as Dr. Coke was with the seat of Cokesbury. But all is right that works right, and all is wrong that works wrong, and we must be blamed by men of slender sense for consequences impossible to foresee—for other people’s misconduct. Sabbath day, Monday, and Tuesday we were shut up in Bethel with the traveling and local ministry and the trustees that could be called together. We ordained fourteen or fifteen local and traveling deacons. It was thought expedient to carry the first design of education into execution, and that we should employ a man of sterling qualifications, to be chosen by and under the direction of a select number of trustees, and others who should obligate themselves to see him paid, and take the profits, if any, arising from the establishment. Dr. Jennings was thought of, talked of, and written to.” (Asbury’s Journal, Vol. II., page 394.) The appointments to the Western circuits for this year, as given in the General Minutes, are as follows: Kentucky District. William McKendree, P. Elder. Sciota and Miami, Henry Smith. Limestone, Benjamin Lakin. Hinkstone and Lexington, William Burke, Thomas Wilkerson, Lewis Hunt. Danville, Hezekiah Harriman. Salt River and Shelby, John Sale, William Marsh. Cumberland, John Page, Benj. Young. Green, Samuel Douthet, Ezekiel Burdine. Holston and Russell, James Hunter. New-River, John Watson. (Minutes of Conferences, Vol. I., 1773-1828, page 99.) II. JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN ANNUAL CONFERENCE, HELD AT EBENEZER, STATE OF TENNESSEE, OCTOBER 1, 1801.? MeMBERS OF THE CONFERENCE. Francis Asbury, Bishop, Nicholas Snethen, William McKendree, Lewis Garrett, James Douthit, William Burk,* Thomas Wilkerson, John Sale,* John Watson, Hezekiah Harriman,* James Hunter, Benjamin Lakin,* Samuel Douthit, Henry Smith,* John Page, Benjamin Young,* Ezekiel Burdine, ' Lewis Hunt,* Tobias Gibson.* Those marked thus * were not present. John A. Granade came recommended for admition on Trial. It is the Judgement of the Conference, that he has a certain hardness and stubbornness in his temper, which has produced, some improper Conclusions; but as he has given some hopeful assureance, that in future, he will be more teachable, and as his piety, and zeale, is not doubted, the Conference, is of opinion that he may be admitted, after receiving a Special Council from the Bishop. Whereas Francis Poythress, appears to be incapable of taking a Station, it is agreed too by the Conference, that his name shall stand on the Minutes among the Elders; and that he shall have a porpotionable clame on the Conference, for his support. William McKendree, Thomas Wilkerson, John Page, 76 The Rise of Methodism in the West. and John Watson are appointed a committee, to adjust the preachers’ finances. Quest: What Local preachers are ordained to the office of Deacons? Ansr. James Landrum, Jesse Thomas, and William Duzan. It is the desire of this Conference, that the Presiding Elders, take it upon themselves to insist on the preach- ers in the Western Districts, to attend the next Yearly Yonference. Paid to the Preachers’ Fund the following Sums: William McKendree, ....$ 2 00 William Burk,* .........$ 2 00 Thos. Wilkerson, for 6 John Sale,* ..........6. 2 00 MODUS; voce esa wasn 100 Benjamin Lakin,* ...... 2 00 James Hunter, ......... 200 Henry Smith,* ......... 2 00 Samuel Douthit, ........ 200 Lewis Hunt,*........... 2 00 John Page, ............. 2 00 Ezekiel Burdine, ....... 2 67 $10 00 John Watson, .......... 2 00 $14 67 Lewis Garrett, for 6 months, .............. 1 00 $24 67 $14 67 Those marked * failed to send thire money to the fund, but being Claiments on the Charter fund, the Committee Judge it proper to deduct their part. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CLAIMES. Draft on the Charter Fund for 1799.... | $80.. Claiments for this year: es William Burk, ............. $ 53 00] ........... 34] 2 John Page, ..........02.000e A900) as Saat xin 11 3 Lewis Hunt, ............... 89 67] ........08. 26; 2 John Watson, .............4. 10°00 | oedseax cade 06/ «a —| 3 $121 67 77] 8 Remds., 3 S The Journal for 1801. V7 Draft on the Charter Fund for 1800...$80 00 Claiments for this year: William Burk, ............. S111 88 cadeeesqesen $ 34 00 Lewis Hunt, .............. BB O10 casieaivecmdssvadeve ce 18 00 Henry Smith, ............. 49 90 wc... lee eee 16 00 John Sale, .............00, S06 seetice semis § 11 00 feat S 25 00. Wass icenes eaves $ 5 00 William McKendree ....... 25:00) [dives sas cea tees 15 00 William Burk ............. 160 00 javictead ca diass)eieaceae< TORN: Sale: cccapeca cis dierent «sits ote D920 is cuecasevnreey sox ciate a:a.]ce a> 28. Sagi es Lawner Blackman ......... BGs OO. ii cseras aes ore vercesaverene 16 81 Jacob Young .......-..-06. BD 100 "| sisecstavehatine sve 8) Sei 17 44 Thomas Milligan .......... G2: BS: 5 levees gare a re we oral cakbtageuesete Elisha W. Bowman ........ 41.62) |aewes onsdiew ova |orade seme William Pattison .......... 55 00° lsc. snawvediewes er ssaue es Benjamin Lakin ........... LOO: DOB] isis: soewioaveeweedd-c 8 00 Ralph Lotspiech ........... ROC le 84 da aieanesoe ear eaeetas Joseph Hays ......cereeeeee TL 00) be. esgpsicriarii ard veh es | areisueenio ies Fredrick Etiers, 6 months..| 40 00 [.............ee]eecweeees John McClure ............. 4500 lic csachove neces 30 00 Zadock B. Thackston ....... 90:00. Wriwss cane ve aden 60 00 Abraham Amos ............ 80 00° [accceewessiewee| wv scadieas Solomon Langdon .......... 90: 00 asin araivine s.cieveeres 60 00 Caleb W. Cloud ............ TO 300. | nce carsieset eacesiawye |i oS navese’ Nathan Barnes ..........-. 80:00 NV eescaseae saaas bees ede s Joseph Oglesby ..........-. 1S MAE ieee o tins Sa neds |G Get Mags Thomas Lasley ............ 50:00 lessee vasa ew ness 16 38 George Askin ............. 90:00 Ismescrases samen 27 50 James Ward ......-e.ee0e- VAG OD. caus on dans ea eeers 10 00 Adjet McGuier ............ G0! OO: | | avers sexnanense cepa s 20 53 James Davison, 6 months...| 24 00 |........ ssc ceca lee eee eens James Watt, 6 months ..... 2A OQ Waverics ee sere scbraauw atl syace aia aero’ James Axley .......-.0000- 45.00) haset ox sewewaew 30 00 Anthony Houston .......... 63:00 |nox.s tsekeevcex [esuwaceuis Jesse Walker .........+0+- 60 00 J...ecceceeevee-| 40 98 The Journal for 1808. What each preacher received from the Circuits, &e. Thomas Hellums Samuel Sellers David Young .............. Moses Ashworth ........... William Virmillion Samuel Parker ............ William Houston Richard Browning Peter Cartwright Miles Harper Benjamin Edge James King ............... Joseph Williams Hector Sanford Milton Ladd .............. Fredrick Hood Hezekiah Shaw Abbott Goddard John Collins John Travis John Crane Joseph Bennett Sela Pain Isaac Quinn John Clingan John Henagar John Crag William Lewis Thomas Kirkman Edmond Wilcox Jedediah McMin Jacob Turman Josiah Crawford Thomas Stilwell Henry Mallory Thomas Trower, 6 months.. Joshua Oglesby Valentine Cook William Mitchel 145 What was given to make up the deficencies; at Conference ap- propriated as follows: $498 46 We find the money Collected among the Preachers that was not disposed of to be $69.50, which is expended as follows, Viz: William: Lewis sccscsaad cociecec smears cs tae ee on $22 50 Valentine. Cock, sisiv sac criswiete seme ee eeee es 5 00 Banjamin Wdge: sos siawees seeks stews oa wee yeas 15 00 Isaac McCown, ........-. eittvaianah of retaohe vesasesen 15:00 10 146 The Rise of Methodism in the West. John. McClure: oie sce vieneneec gee ee nage te ees 7 50 Thomas Hellumas «04 oc cis sve be odes He eiee oes ee 7 50 72 50 A collection was made among the Committee and others to the amount of $3 which will account for the difference. Signed by the Committee. JOHN SALE, LAWNER BLACKMAN, SAMUEL PARKER. The Conference proceeded to take a vote that the old rule be revived of fasting and abstinance on all Fridays in the year. Carried. The Conference voted that the next Western Annual Conference be held at Cincinnati on the 380th day of September, 1809. The Conference resolved that the Preachers be re- quested to make a return to the next Annual Confer- ence of all the Licensed Preachers, Local Deacons, and Elders. John Sale proceeded to read an anonimous letter ad- dressed to him respecting a pamphlet intitled The Fe- male Instructor or Matron’s Address to her Daughters. The Conference are determined not to give circulation to any pamphlets or publications that do not come un- der the patronage of the General or Annual Confer- ences. Zadock B. Thackston received a Supernumerary Sta- tion. William Burk proceeded to read several resolu- tions sent from the Quarterly Meeting Conference of Hinkston and Limestones Circuits, stateing the neces- sity of a rule on the subject of slavery as it respects buying and selling. William Burk proceeded to read the remonstrance of the Local Preachers from Lexing- ton and Salt River Circuits respecting the ordination of Local Deacons to the office of Elders. Bishop Mc- Kendree proceeded to read an answer to the above remonstrance. The Journal for 1808. 147 William Burk proceeded to read an Address to the Annual Conference, setting forth the necessity of a rule on the subject of buying and selling slaves. Signed by James Guinn. Fripay Mornine 7TH Day or Conr. We move that the subject of slavery be considered and some dicisive rule be made on that subject. John Collins, Samuel Parker. The Conference proceeded to appoint a Committee to draft a Rule on the Subject of Slavery. Resolved that John Sale, Banjamin Lakin, and William Burk be appointed said Committe. The case of Durham Turner, a Local Preacher from Barren Circuit, came before the Conference in the form of an appeal. The Conference confirmed the judgment of the Quarterly Meeting Conference. By information received from James Ward respect- ing John Watson, a Local Preacher from Wayn Cir- cuit, the Conference are of opinion that he may be re- ceived on trial as a Travilling Preacher. After exami- nation he was ordained a Deacon. William Burk re- ported from the Committe appointed to draft a Rule on the Subject of Slavery. The Conference proceeded to the examination of the report. On the vote being taken, the majority nega- tived the report and ordered that the same lay on the lable for amendment. It was moved and seconded that the above report continue to lay on the table, and that the address signed by James Guinn be taken up and considered. The Conference determine to take up the said address, and the same was negatived. Lawner Blackman proceeded to read a letter addressed to Val- entine Cook on the subject of his Mission, in which he is informed that the Conference will pay him when able, 148 The Rise of Methodism in the West. The Committe appointed to examine the Book ac- counts of the Presiding Elders reported. “The report was received by the Conference. The report of the Committe appointed to Draft a Rule on the Subject of Slavery, haveing been amended, the Conference pro- ceeded to take a vote on the report as amended and adopted the following regulations: WESTERN ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Quest. What method shall be taken with a member of our Society that shall enter into the Slave Trade and shall buy or sell a Slave or Slaves? Ansser. Every preacher who has the charge of a Circuit shall upon information received cite every such member or members so buying or selling a Slave or Slaves to appear at the insueing Quarterly Meeting Conference and there to submit his or their case to the judgment of the said Quarterly Meeting Conference who shall proceed to determine wheather the Person or Persons have purchased or sold such Slave or Slaves in a case of mercy or humanity or from speculative motives, and if a majority of the Quarterly Meeting Conference judge that they have bought or sold with such speculative motives they shall accordingly expel every such Person or Persons. And in case the Presedent of the Quarterly Meeting Confer- ence should differ in judgment from the majority and think they have retained the Person or Persons improperly, he may refer his or their case to the insueing Annual] Conference and if any Person or Persons think they are injured by the dicision of the Quarterly Meeting Conference such Person or Persons shall be allowed an appeal to the insueing Annual Conference, pro- vided they signify the same to the Quarterly Meeting Confer- ence at the time of trial, and the Presedent of the Quarterly Meeting Conference shall cause the minutes of such trial to be laid before the Annual Conference who shall judge and finally determine in every such case. Francis ASBURy, WILLIAM McKENDREE, Liberty Hill, Tennessee, October 7th, 1808. WittiaAmM Bork, Secty. The Conference proceeded to examine the Accounts of the Trustees of the Charity Fund. It was motioned The Journal for 1808. 149 and seconded that the Trustees of the Charity Fund be desolved. Resolved that the Trustees of the Chari- ty Fund be disolved. The Conference proceeded to receive the Address of the Committee Appointed to draw up an Address to our Brethern requesting them to make an Annual Col- lection by Subscription or otherwise to meet the dis- tresses of the most indegent, and as far as possible to meet the deficencies of the Preachers. Resolved that the Address be received and signed by the Bishops, and that a coppy of the same be put into the hands of the assistant of every Circuit. Liserty Hitt, TENNESSEE, October 7th, 1808. The Western Conference Assembled to all under Her Patronage Sendeth Greeting. Dear Brethren: We feel ourselves as much as ever interested in the happiness of our fellow creatures and are conscious that a large field is opening in almost every direction for the spread of the Gospel. Hundreds and thousands are inviteing us to come to their help, many valuable men are willing to take up their Cross and brook all the difficulties of an itenerant life in order to spread the gospel of the Redeemer’s Kingdom, but we lack means for their supply, for after all the exertions that have been made in the several Circuits and the conscientious application of $470, which is all we receive from the Book Concern and Chartered Fund, we still find ourselves insolvent $2,016.34%. We have therefore thought proper to address you on the occasion and solicit your assistance to inable us to spread useful knowl- edge and do all the good we possibly can. We hope, dear Brethren, you will not be backward in setting your hands to paper and giving us your word that you will pay us whatever sums you may think proper to affix to your names. We wish you to understand us, we do not mean that these collections are to be applied to the preachers as their Quarterage. We hope you will dc all you can to make up their preachers their allowance in their several Circuits, and that this extra collection be trans- mitted to the Annual Conference to meet the destresses of the more indegent. We assure you dear Brethern that we shall be particular in the distrebution of whatever sum or sums you may please to forward to us. 150 The Rise of Methodism in the West. We conclude by praying that God may prosper you in your souls and bodies, in your baskett and store, and when our toiis and sufferings are at an end we hope to meet you in the land of Rest. We are, dear Brethern, yours in the bonds of a peacable Gospel. WILLIAM Burk, Secty. Francis ASBURY, WILLIAM McKENDREE. The Conference proceeded to make a settlement with the deligates to the last General Conference, the Con- ference and the deligates agree to ballance accounts. The Conference directed that $33.50 now in the hands of the former Trustees of the Charity Fund be depos- ited with William Burk for the use and benifit of the Trustees of Bethel Academy. Bishop Asbury proceeded to give the Conference some advice respecting the important subject of the mesterious doctrine of the Trinity, Divinity, and Hu- manity of Christ in which he advises all to attend to the language of Scripture. The Conference proceed to make a collection to pay for the Printing of Pamphlets which are to be given away and which William Burk by the direction of the last Conference had printed. The collection amounted to $10. The Stations being read, the Conference adjourned to meet again at Cincinnati, State of Ohio, September the 30th, 1809. Signed in and by order of the Conference. WituiAM Burg, Secty. Francis Aspury, Wituiam MckKenprer. Note 9.—To the Conference of 1808 Bishop Asbury came, in an “afflicted state,” by way of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Ken- tucky, preaching, ordaining, and counciling as he came. Travel- ing with him is Martin Boehm, who occasionally preaches in German. Among the places where the Bishop preached are Bush Creek, Chillicothe, Deer Creek Camp Meeting, Xenia, Little The Journal for 1808. 151 Miami, Lawrenceburg, in Indiana, and at many of the cabins along the way. He spent from September 8 to October 1 passing through Kentucky. In his Journal for October 1 is this entry: “T began conference. I preached twice on the Sabbath day; and again on Tuesday. Our conference was a camp-meeting, where the preachers ate and slept in tents. We sat six hours a day, stationed eighty-three preachers, and all was peace. On Friday the sacrament was administered, and we hope there were souls converted, and strengthened, and sanctified. We made a regu- lation respecting slavery; it was, that no member of society, or preacher, should sell or buy a slave unjustly, inhumanly, or covetously; the case, on complaint, to be examined for a member by the quarterly meeting; and for a preacher an appeal to an annual conference. Where the guilt was proved the offender to be expelled. The families of the Hills, Sewalls, and Cannon, were greatly and affectionately attentive to us.” Returning east, the Bishop and his party crossed the moun- tains into North Carolina. Of the month of October this year (1808), the Bishop says: “It has been a serious October to me; I have laboured and suffered; but I have lived near to God.” (Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III, pages 247-252.) The appointments for 1808, as given in the General Minutes, were as follows: Hotston District. Learner Blackman, P. Elder. Holston, William Pattison, Moses Ashworth. Watauga, Thomas Milligan. Nollichuckie, Thomas Trower, Horatio Barnes. French-Broad, Nathan Barnes, Isaac Lindsey. Clinch, Isaac Quinn, Lewis Anderson. Powell’s Valley, James Axley. - Carter’s Valley, Moses Black. Tennessee Valley, Milton Ladd. CUMBERLAND District. Miles Harper, P. Hider. Nashville, Elisha W. Bowman, William Virmillion. Red River, Fredrick Stier. Barren, Joseph Bennett, John Lewis. Roaring River, Zadok B. Thackston, John Travis. Livingston, Thomas Kirkman. Hartford, Samuel Sellers, Jacob Turman. Duck River, John Cragg. Elk, Thomas Stilwell. 152 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Dixon, William Lewis. James Guinn, missionary. Kentucky District. James Ward, P. Elder. Limestone, James King, Wm. Winans. Licking, John Clingan. Lexington, Caleb W. Cloud, William B. Elgin. Danville, David Hardesty, John Henninger. Salt River, Peter Cartwright. Shelby, George Askin, Henry Mallory. Green River, John Watson, Richard Richards. Wayne, Sela Paine. Cumberland, Richard Browning. Hinkstone, William Burke, Eli Truitt, J. Blair. Fleming, Joshua Oglesby, Edmund Wilcox. Mississippi District. John McClure, P. Elder. Natchez, Thomas Hellums. Wilkinson, Jedediah McMinn. Claiborne, Anthony Houston, Appalousas, Benjamin Edge Washataw, Isaac McKowen. INDIANA Districr. Samuel Parker, P. Elder. Illinois, Jesse Walker. Missouri, Abraham Amos. Maramack, Joseph Oglesby. Cold Water, John Crane. White Water, Hector Sanford, Moses Crume. Silver Creek, Josiah Crawford. Miami District. John Sale, P. Elder. Cincinnati, Wm. Houston, John Sinclair. Mad River, Hezekiah Shaw, Wm. Young, S. Henkle. Scioto, Abbott Goddard, Joseph Williams, Deer Creek, John Collins, Wood Lloyd. Hockhocking, Benj. Lakin, John Johnson. White Oak, David Young. Musxineum District. James Quinn, P. Elder. Fairfield, Ralph Lotspeich, John Bowman. Wills Creek, James Watts, Wm. Young last six months. West Wheeling, Jacob Young, Thomas Church. Marietta, Solomon Langdon. Little Kanawha, William Mitchell. Guyandott, John Holmes. Leading Creek, Thomas Lasley. X. JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN CONFERENCE BEGUN AND HELD AT CINCINNATI, STATE OF OHIO, SEPTEMBER THE 380TH, 1809.*° MrmbBers of CONFERENCE. Those marked * not present. Francis Asbury, Bishop William McKendree, Bishop Lawner Blackman William Pattison Moses Ashworth* Nathan Barnes* Isaac Quinn James Axley Thomas Milligan* Milton Ladd Miles Harper Elisha ‘W. Bowman* ‘William Vermillion* Frederick Stire Joseph Bennett Zadock B. Thackston* John Travis Samuel Sellars Samuel Parker Jesse Walker John Oglesby Abraham Amos John Crane* Hector Sanford* John McClure* Thomas Hellums* Anthony Houston Benjamin Edge James Ward William Burk Joshua Oglesby Edmond Wilcox James King John Clingon Caleb W. Cloud George Askin Peter Cartwright Sela Pain Richard Browning* John Sale Hezekiah Shaw Abbott Goddard Joseph Williams John Collim Benjamin Lakin William Houston David Young James Quinn Ralph Lotspiech Jacob Young Thomas Lasley Solomon Langdon Robert Cloud Thomas Trower ‘Admitted as Members John Henniger John Cragg* William Lewis Jedidiah McMin* Jacob Turman William Mitchel Josiah Crawford Thomas Stilwell Henry Maloney Thomas Church* 154 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Both the Bishops and a Majority of the Conference being present, they proceeded to business, Bishop As- bury in the Chare. The hours agreed upon for the sitting of the Conference are as follows, At 9 oc in the Morning and 3 oc in the Afternoon to Adjourn at 12 oc and at & Afternoon. It is Likewise agreed that Henry Boehm be admitted to have a seat among us in Con- ference and should Daniel Hitt come duering the time of Conference he may be priviladged the same as Broth- er H. Boehm. It is further agreed that no one leave the Conference toom without first giveing notise. Brother John Sale moved that the Conference pro- ceed to nominate 5 as a Committe of Appropriation. Lawner Blackman moved that the number consist of 3. The Question being taken the Conference are of Opinion that the number consist of 5. The votes being taken by ballott it appears that Samuel Parker, Lawner Blackman, John Sale, John Collins, and William Burk are hereby appointed said Committe. The Conference proceeded to make a Draft on the Chartered Fund for $140 and likewise a Draft on the Book Concern for $300. SaTuerRDAY AFTERNOON BisHop ASBURY IN THE CHARE. The Conference proceeded to collect the money sub- scribed by the preachers at Last, which amounted to £85.00. The Conference proceeded to receive the money collected from the different Districts according to the plan proposed by the last Annual Conference, (viz) From Holston Destrict.$ 1 00 5 Muskingum Do Bases 2 Cumberland Do 80 00 6 Indianna Do Dates 3 Kentucky Do 164 87% 7 Mississippi Do Sesame 4 Miami Do 73 25 The whole amount collected by me eybecnption eae 12 1-2. i The Journal for 1809. 155 By the direction of the Bishop John Sale proceeded to read a letter from John McClure, Presiding Elder in the Mississippi Destrict, addressed to the Bishops and Conference. Monpay Morning BisHop McKENDREB IN THE CHARE. The Conference meet according to appointment. And William Burk from the Committe of Appropria- tions proceeded to read their report so far as they had progressed and the Conference agree to receive the following report: On Satuerday Evening 7 oc the Committe of Appropriations meet according to appointment consisting of John Sale, Lawner Blackman, Samuel Parker, John Collins, and William Burk. They proceeded to organize themselves in the following manner, John Sale, Presedent and William Burk Secratary, and they ac- cordingly proceeded to business. 1. It is the opinion of the Committe that the following be submitted to the Conference as a Proper Method to Establish Uniformity in Respect to Travilling Expenses: 1 Horse Shewing 2 Tavern Bills 3 Feredge’s 4 Turn pikes 5 Tole Bridge’s 6th and Lastly that the Bishops are to be considered as Exempt cases, and therefore they are to be Allowed as Expenses what- ever they may pay for official Letters and for Persons to Conduct them from Place to Place. 2. Resolved by the Committe that we will only destribute the sums from the Chartered fund and Book Concern to those who are defficient, and that the surplus collections be disposed of at the discretion of the Committe to the most necesitous by the approbation of the Conference. 3. Resolved that if a preacher neglect his circuit in the inter- vaels of the Annual Conference that he shall be subject to a de- duction of his allowance if he be deficient. John Henigar’s case before the Conference for ad- mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. John Cragg’s case before the Conference for admis- sion, the Conference are of opinion that he be admitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. William Lewis’s case before the Conference for ad- 156 The Rise of Methodism in the West. mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. Thomas Kirkman’s case before the Conference for admission, the Conference are of opinion that consid- ering his Local Situation, bodily debility and want of Attention to his Circuit, that he be discontinued. Jedidiah McMin’s case before the Conference for ad- inission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted, and elect him to the office of a Deacon. Jacob Turman’s case before the Conference for ad- mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. William Mitchel’s case before the Conference for admission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. Josiah Crawford’s case before the Conference for .ad- mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. Thomas Stilwell’s case before the Conference for ad- mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- initted and they elect him to the office of a Deacon. Henry Mallory’s case before the Conference for ad- mission, the Conference are of opinion that he be ad- mitted and they accordingly admit as a Travilling preacher. James Gwinn’s case before the Conference for admis- sion, the Conference are of opinion that he be discon- tinned. Monpay ArtTernoon BisHor McKEnpree IN THE CHARE. The cases and charrecters of those purposed as Local Preachers, for Deacons Orders came before the Con- ference, and it is the opinion of the Conference that following Persons be elected (viz) Elijah Sparkes, La- ban Brazer, Peter Hastings, Joseph Joslin, Joseph White, Joseph Proctor, William Duglass, Thomas Mitchel, and Charles Holliday. The Journal for 1809. 157 Turspay Mornine BisHor McKenpren IN THE CHARE. The Conference proceeded to finish the cases and charrecters of Local Preachers applying for Deacons Orders as follows, Elijah Sutton, Archabold McElory, Henry Thompson, William Roggers, Warrick Bristoo, Benjamin Bonham, Elias Turner, Cornelious McGuier, Zachues Queshnbury, John Powers, Edward Hall, and Robert Daugherty, The charrecter of Thomas Trower and John Travice, who were elected to Deacons orders last Conference, but were not Ordained in consequence of their not be- ing Present there charecters stood approved before the Conference when examined. Turespay AFTERNOON BisHop McKENpDREE IN THE CHARE. The Conference proceeded to Answer the 7 Question (I E) Who have Located this year? Answered as fol- lows, Thomlas Milligan, Nathan Barnes, Moses Ash- worth, William Virmillion, Thomas Church, Joseph Oglesby, Edmond Wilcox, and John Oglesby. Elisha W. Bowman applied by letter to the Confer- ence for a Location, it is the opinion of the Conference that he be placed among the Superanuated. It was moved by William Burk that the Award of the Committe Respecting Elisha W. Bowman be en- tered on the Journal, the vote being taken, it was or- dered that the same be inserted. Pursuant to a Resolution of the Western Annual Conference Held at Liberty Hill, Cumberland, Tennessee, October, 1808, we the Committe according to the instructions given have Waited on the Rev. Elisha W. Bowman, and have Convesed with him on the Substance of the Complaints or Charges Exhibited against him at Said Conference. And So far as we are Capable of Judging, think the Com- plaints or Charges groundless, and that their is no Reason of Complaint against him. As Witness Our hands JAMES Warp. Monday October 31st 1808, WItLiAM BurE. 158 The Rise of Methodism in the West. [At this point in the Journal the handwriting changes, though Burk continues to be the Secretary. The writing resembles that of Learner Blackman, who was the Secretary for the session of 1811.—Editor.] Robert Miller a Local Preacher in Flemming Circuit was Recommended at the Quarterly Meeting Conference for Deacons orders—but thro’ forgetfulness no written Recommendation came forward to the Annual Confer- ence. But the Annual Conference are of opinion that in this case the regular Method be dispinsed with & the Conference elect him to the Office of a Deacon. The Cases and Characters of those who remain on trial for Elders office examined before the conference & nothing alledged against any of them. WepNeEspAy Mornine Bishop McKENpREE IN THE CHAIR. John Sale moved that the Conference allow him a certain Discount on some damaged Books sent to his District from the Book Steward, the Conference: are of oppinion that the Sd. Discount be allowed him. John Shields forwarded a note to the Bishops & Con- ference stating ‘his dissatisfaction concerning the nega- tive put on his recommendation for Deacon’s orders on which the Conference are of oppinion that there be a Special Committee appointed to converse with him on the subject, and the Committee which was appointed on this Occasion was to consist of the four following persons, John Sale, James Quinn, John Collins & Wil- liam Burk. The Conference proceed to examine the characters of those eligible to the office of Elders on which the Con- ference are of oppinion that the following persons be and are hereby elected to that Office—Thomas Hel- lums,* Samuel Sellars, & David Young. Joseph Williams’s case came next before the Confer- ence. On mature deliberation they are of oppinion Ist That he shall not be Elected to the Office of an Elder The Journal for 1809, 159 2nd That it is the Oppinion of the Conference He shall not be employed any longer as a Travelling Preacher 3rd And Lastly that he shall receive a Location & they Accordingly Give him Sd. Location. John Holms from the Baltimore Conference his case came before the Conference & after examining into his character the Conference are of oppinion that he be elected to the Office of an Elder. The Conference proceeded to the examination of the characters of those who continue on Trial. They are as follows, William Young, John Bowman, who are continued, But on Examining duly into the case of Horatio Barnes, the Conference are of oppinion that not for any immorality but from a consideration of the irregularity of his mind and Actions he be discontinued. WEDNESDAY IN THE AFTERNOON BisHOoP McCKENDREE IN THE CHAIR. William Winan’s case & character before the Con- ference. It is the oppinion of the Conference that he remain on Trial & that BP. McKendree give him a se- vere reprimand for his conduct & that this be done be- fore the Conference, his conduct which is deemed im- proper is his making proposals of marriage to the Sis- ters & his general familiarity with the fair. John Martin Local Preacher present before the Con- ference praying that he may have an Appeal to this Annual Conference from the judgement of the Deer Sreek Quarterly Meeting Conference who had suspend- ed him from Official Services, it is the opinion of the Conference that his case does not come before them in consequence of its being only a Suspension from Official Services. The Conference then proceeded to resume the busi- ness of examining the cases & characters of those who remain on Trial. (viz) Lewis Anderson, John Lewis, 160 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Isaac McCown, Richard Richards, William B. Elgin, John Johnston, Isaac Lindsay, Moses Crume, Eli Tru- itt, John Watson, & James Blair,—Nothing stated against any of them. TourspAyY Morning Bishop McK@NDREE IN THE CHAIR. Tho. Scott Local Preacher from Deer Creek Quarter- ly Meeting Conference now before the Conference. Praying that he may have an Appeal to this Annual Conference from the judgement of Sd. Quarterly Meet- ing Conference; The Chair gave it as his oppinion that the Appeal might properly lay before this Conference, a vote being taken the Conference concured in oppinion. The Legality of the Appeal was objected to in conse- quence of his not having signified his intention of Ap- pealing at the Quarter Meeting Conference. But as said T. Scott was unavoidably absent at the time of Quarterly Meeting it is the oppinion of this Conference that the case does properly come before them. Upon the Chair giving it as his oppinion that the Appeal could not be acted upon at this Conference for want of the necessary documents or papers the vote being tak- en the Majority of the Conference differed in Oppinion. It is further determined in the Conference by vote that they will continue in cession until the business be finished. On which the following paper was laid upon the Table: CINCINNATI ANNUAL CONFERENCE. A charge exhibited against Tho. Scott before the Quarterly Meeting Conference held at White Browns for Deer Creek Cir- cuit, August 26, 1809, was as follows (Viz) that he attended a Berbecue in the Town of Chilicothe on the 4th of July. October 5th 1809. . After taking into view the complete State of the Case the Conference are of oppinion that the whole of the Business be sent back as unfinished to the said Quarterly Meeting Conference of Deer Creek Circuit & The Journal for 1809. 161 there to have the same adjusted & that Caleb W. Cloud & Tho. Stillwell be & are hereby appointed to write a letter of Conciliation to the said Quarterly Meeting Conference. Tuurspay AFTERNOON BisHor McKrnprer In THp CHAIR. Bishop McKendree proceeded to give William Winans a reprimand before the Conference for his improper conduct toward the Female Sex especially his making proposals of Marriage in an improper way. It is moved by Samuel Parker & seconded by John Collins that James Gwin’s case be taken up & recon- sidered—on taking a vote it is resolved that his case be taken up & reconsidered & it becomes the oppinion of the Conference on the reexamination that he remain on trial. The Conference now proceeded to the first- Question of the Minutes for the Itinerary & received the recom- mendations & examine the cases and characters of those who are to be admitted on Trial. It is the op- pinion of the Conference that the following persons be admitted on trial (Viz), 1. James B. Findley, a married man & one child from Scioto Circuit. 2. Alex- ander Cummins from Hockhockin Circuit a married man with one child. 3. John Brown a single man from Hockhockin Circuit. 4. Walter Griffith came recom- mended from White Oak Circuit Miami District, the Conference are of opinion that his recommendation be not received but admit that the Presiding Elder shall be at liberty to employ him. Stephen Timmons from the Scioto Circuit who hath been a travelling Preacher some years ago in the Bal- timore & Philadelphia Conferences & after several years Location in the bounds of the Western Conference & now sending forward a request to Travel the Confer- ence complied with said request. 11 162 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Fripay Morning Bishop McKENpREE IN THE CHAIR. The Committe of Appropriations proceeded to read their report to the Conference which was ordered to lay on the Table for further consideration. After which the Conference proceed to receive the recommendations of those who are recommended as travelling Preachers. Holston District. 1. Samuel Hellums from the Nolichuckie Circuit a single man. Indiana District. 2. Thomas Wright from the Illinois Circuit a mar- ried man about 25 years of age. Kentucky District. 3. Charles Holliday from the Licking Circuit a mar- ried man. 4. Henry McDaniel from the Hinkstone Circuit a married man. Muskingum District. 5. Samuel West from the Kanawha Circuit a single man of about 23 years of age. Kentucky District. 6. Thos. Nelson from the Danville Circuit a single man. Fripay ArrerNoon BisHop McKpnprer IN THE CHAIR. Cumberland District. The Conference continued the Progress of receiving such as came recommended to the Conference as Trav- elling Preachers (Viz) 7. Samuel H. Thompson, a young man from Hart- ford Circuit. 8. John Manley from Livingston Circuit a single man. The Journal for 1809. 163 9. Francis Travis from Livingston Circuit a single man. 10. Daniel McElyea from Dixon Circuit a single man. The case of Stephen Timmons reconsidered from a motion made & seconded & the Conference of Oppinion they reverse their former vote respecting him. The Conference next enter into an examination of the cases & characters of the Elders in which proceed- ure there was some difficulties suggested respecting improper doctrines having been held forth in some par- ticular points on which it is the opinion of the Chair that a Committee be appointed to examine into doc- trines the Committee appointed is the following persons (Viz) Bishop McKendree, Lawner Blackman, Samuel Parker, & William Burk who are to examine the Meth- odist Doctrines. SatturpAy Mornine BisHop McKEnpREn IN THE CHAIR. He proceeded to the Examination of the following Persons (Viz) John Bowman, William Young, John Travis, John Watson, James Blair, Eli Truitt, John Henagar, & Josiah Crawford respecting their Faith & practice as Ministers. Bishop McKendree then proceeded to deliver a Mes- sage to Bro. Miles Harper & to give him some advice relating to some of his peculiarities, to be attended to by him in his future conduct. The Conference proceeded to continue in the progress of the Examinations of the Characters of the Elders &c. The Conference next proceeded to receive the report of the Committee of Appropriations so far as they have progressed the report states that there is yet in re serve $99.00 yet to be appropriated to necessitous cases. Tue REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF APPROPRIATIONS AS FOLLows. Draft on the Chartered Fund ......... cece cece eee ee eens $140 00 Draft on the Book Concern ....... cece eee eee eee eee 300 00 Preachers Collection: ../62s668-e8 wae oo ee cscs Sed Se eee = 85 00 Collection from Holston District ..........6. ese e ee eeee 1 00 164 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Collection from Cumberland District ..........-..+0000- 80 00 Collection from Kentucky District .........-. ee esse eeee 164 87 Collection from Miami District ............ eee eee e neces 75 25 Publick Collection at Conference ...... cece cece eee enees 41 68 | 887 80 1. Holston Destrict, Defi- — Appro- cient, priated. Francis: ASDUDY. 264 eeeevs tea eoseaies de ss eed Gece seme $ 25 00 William McKendree .............. die aed e Ree oll Sawa we 25 00 Lawner Blackman ss sce sss scaaiye3 Gees s bein des @ arden’ 10 00] .ecses WATT: PATHS OM: 3 .005.5 seicese ae Gustin Sadie. Sucaac es lax ries yeaoe aes 8 00) isis ss Moses Ashworth, 3 months ...............0000- 44 00} 15 66 Thomas: Trower «i swien cowtianpawie sae ory unas 41 00 1 00 Horatia Barnes: ach gaviee yc ates neealvecie se eareue aera 50 00} 10 00 Nathan. Barnes: o.60i.¢ sence aiveanee eeisa eaten s08 ae 45 00 5 00 Teaad LANASeY’ sws-sss metyas sine 6 o6 Hee baa ew ds Fetes 53 00] 138 00 SAAC: QUININE. Ssieead-ce 4 Righers a4 Gaslg Hak Sea Eee MEG aoe 40 00] ...... TIS WAS: ATIGEPSON: io oecs sedarerein.d vasy: bse so Soriains Sab acetal Bese even 40 00] ...... JaMes AKC gess s ca.shaawew daha ed cies feck eae Faas 40 00] ...... Moses Black, Dees’d, 6 TIONS « «ay sves sieve sete eo sgh soars 66 00} 26 00 "THOMAS: Mill eam se! aise Cac g-arsvaiets 6-8 oh eaear eo aise yoo Guess 15 00] ...... Milton Ladd. sins caviar soegaw 45 doesn anes aie « 56 00; 16 00 508 00] 136 66 2. Cumberland Destrict. Miles APUGE sake cones id ened eeeg ce wes eee eee Ge ekes || SRE Hlisha: W.- BOWMAN iss wa snsie ew tahoe saeco o's.alf ea dwied cee eibusle William Vermillion, si -2. soa os resale esas vaven oe 40 00] ...... Frederi¢: Stern: «,és:0:i08 bs des < ab Sage eee ee a aeaes 12 70) wssnws Joseph Bennett 2.cs0cccsescers vse beeen sy ianwwes 39 63] ...... JON LOWS ge io caddovsdewenivus downy wee tsewewes] co cece] sea ees Zadock B.. TLHACKStOM, oo. sce 04 Sake. 6 Gas oa Se de 122 48) 42 48 FORT. Travis: sos. cates 6 acess codes d e acape wae seve ues 55 50| 15 50 Thomas Kirkman, sass sccees save ceeds s sewne « 92 50} 12 50 Samuel Sellers, sc ccsinwis saseers ies aeee dea sare 90 Weed ore 34 50] ...... JACOD: TULMAR: sconces ns ceaa ds aang eo Mew $4 SkeNaers 41 69 1 69 William Lewis civic cccnce yes cawees pee veanaeies 76 SI csssen0 John, Cras -so.8 sca tw vaseeaas ais 8s a dee oe 99 78} 19 78 Thomas: Stilwell, evs aics cae ausie «a tciand Besser se ecetena Hoe AT 25 7 25 James Gwinn, 3 months .........- cece eee eens 25 00] ...... 687 54} 99 20 3. Indianna Destrict. Samuel Parker’ ..c35 10 e6ccs sae ve sea teawewe. 62 50) 22 50 Jesse Walker sisces sas vay sss wees s wokacasamene’s 89 00 9 00 Joseph Oglesby, 9 months ..............00.e eee 60 00; 30 00 ADFAHAM ATIOS. oscscs v0 ecccene oie meiere di ernrecaie eo wate are 64 58] 24 58 JOHN, Crane: ws-ogierniieacwies ssansegtin ei cinn ia Vaya ate 71 00) 31 00 Hector Samford. isos sa eecd-e cine: ta sei ere eee vote 33.75) sevaes MOsés: Crunie: ssise-ds csaeees dae vacuum e246 sees se or 89 00 9 00 Josiah Crawford) sc.s sees scssn ds saee ses tee vo aes 380 98] ...... 500 81] 126 08 The Journal for 1809, 4, Mississippi Destrict. JOHD: MCClUPG: soit oa tateca stan sie ees eles RS Thomas Hellums ............. 0.00 cee vee e uae Jedediah MeMin .......... 0... cc cc eee e eee e Anthony Houston .......... 0. ccc cece cece eens Benjamin, WaBC: 065. eo veces ed aceseiy cs duwad eareieise asian Tsadac: MGCOWD. secis cada cama vs ova ye dee cee aa 5. Kentucky Destrict. James: Ward «xicude-s64 Hades tieey ed Senco od Siar a tnace UTA TEU Gh acd oe evsetnye ch savancusnd od. aU Sided seedy Sranet deoaraneuecncea seats James Blair si.scsiccs eels Soe atearnee vie eae See With, Burke so 26 cts enreess car dats, San siete: vious Gils babes Seat soaded tan - Joshua Oglesby, 6 months ..............ce eee ee Hdmond Wilcox .......... ccc cece cece cece ee eeee JAMES! KANG 2.0s:g0- 503 shewec ed ook, bates Seale eeu Wi, “WAM D > 253, oissawcceese S65 ander eeardiaue, diese “sieves uceuare John Clingon ..... a Bish suankers Ga wiaie alate Ghat aucun ceeds Boss apats Caled WiCloud) sie siascgg os Sisudiss ecole iia Sine Sense wae see Win, Be Bled isa sia wisra stearate tre pitante acersisyaleanarstciee George ASKIN. o.n660s scesie cae siy oi exes 4 2s Ba Hee REE Henry Mallory ec saisac ss naw vas wows oi ae ys exes Peter Cartwright, 6 months .................... DOHT WatSOm oisiesc's-4.5 cen: 0:8 6 segues avs.) svar soe: euatlene/ee euavers Richard Richards .......... sce eee cece ee ee eens SOla PAU ici sneraaeeecntnn dieters nathan ae! Satie eislneranecers Richard Browning ............ ee see eee ee eee eee JOHN: HONS SAN: sass sigvewg oe were. ts pyeiew 6 @lspdre: quece Scans 6. Miami Destrict. POUT Sal G5 eya sedge: sana ss aeadatinn ed See Gidnees ois SASS Gwe PROZERAAN (SHAW? wee ocsceln se oe suengce sa areuerane een eaves Win, YOUNG! 0 dais os escaie's a gia wear es anes aves Abbott Goddard ......... cc cece eee eee eee eens Joseph Williams: « .sseass case cesied ce eqens eee wats John: Collins: smasner. Hl) velecaave JORD BROWN: cui's64 aire sre Gables ele winine dare eS 20 00 | ..... Samuel: ‘Sellars: sc catcisewiscrwigasiesaane| aevee |) asane "Wakltarm: “YiOuU 8) x0: Aopeiecs carcyacbsa ee sevecrel eS dagace sous 20 00 | ..... Abraham AMOS) se: ice ssa caw saees es Gan ees ibe ss ee Willian “Winans sic seweereshesieces. Mere censor eis ers 20) OD: No wigeacs Solomon Langdon «sisi see sss teases eens 68 8214| ..... Benjaniin: Lakin. sais os ees cee acsawed 4s eee 4 62.32 | wees SONN. COMMS se cdiese’s ccecauncavdwoa ara wietancnesree Riedel setades | |) aye guare Ralph: Liotspleh, 2... ssc. sa nsie 0.0 eters we beuans ate 23 53 | ....- Samuel Hellumss ic csicia sc avsiaiesiaecatiase e baieietae 0 50 00 10 00 JOM Mo Craps s.a'ine Mocca saves alts otas ee aheael eS 85 81 5 81 Robert. Cloud. «3465 +s Gese.s vameses gals 36 See ss 101 70 22 70 William Lewis, 6 months ............-..0.. 48 00 8 00 Sanvel H. THOWpPSOn. ..45..00s5s o¥e bes cee 50 00 10 00 Thomas Lasley ...... een ee rer re er ee an ee FOU TIONS 2. cease secede seanebeteraeeewe| Jeeves FT anaae JONI HenaSer:< scausc nde eee ceaeieasresieade| - sais, “| aires Jedediah McMinn ...........ce cece eee e eens 40 50 50 SACO; CULMAM: erie on rote aeelaes Mauoic Maral eee |. fae James Kins: 20. 0:4 seycesen tiewngeseuseciades| eedes J ween THOTMAIS: SEUWOL occciwicde cuaih dian dees tases 8S esue T5 4k | ceca HEGT EY? MAaVOny. «x o:a: teene. she aatneosd wn ayseaed Deas Mes Sits ate E2000 || -astee Abbott: Godard: -+-viscs sce scnosen« ooreaceawael) —wecaw I) —sreniee Sela. Pain ovine sie wie soa bade ede ee eee yea 2506 | ceaus Piecebigh SHAW wseegeaspeeeeresseszesaeree! eoaan | saaee Hector ‘Sanford «issasicctceieieeveseaweesel cvses | weeds Milton. Ladd, asses adie oss aus ss bees Oem eee 600 | ..... John Travice «1.0... cece ccc cece eee eee ee 33 O7%| ..... Teen CUEA acces when ox awe oo Cpe 6 menses we aah cee oe The Journal for 1810. JOHN CHNGON. .iceiecsanccs see eysaaes sawed ss JON Crame: esc oie co seeee oe argh ake wicudd oe Senedd Thomas TrOWe? « sssisieciadaics ca ccai scence oe Saul: THINKS: 25 awe ds anes 6 Nodderern eRe ciemaere James: B. Winley aaccisasiseaies aaa sie tsatas Henry McDaniel. os .cccsas es naeeas mae ed aus ‘Thomas Nelson, 9+ sais ox saeees coe ia sees Lewis Anderson ............0ce cece cee eees John Lewis, 6 months ................0000- ISAAC: MCCOWD,. oie occ lecie macterig.d ie suaie sein wala Richard Richards ............eeeeeceeeeee William -B. Elgin: cs cscs nes gave nec aia crates Isaac: Lindsey’: vise ss sane s wees gate a ees Moses: Crume ssaccrscwans sues ase nese es twee Hi Truitt «sens: sedseisacaase sea een eer eee’ AMOS: BUA wees: < xisicitiss canon gaye seeds © wecctavn eae ledeve JAMIESS, Guinn: soo scsiesd wa dads a eS tarde aan eae Heese Thomas Kirkman, 6 months ................ We find on examination that Bishop Asbury has Received at each Conference $25 Mak- ing in, the:whole « csics6csitew cee geavsiaws Expended from the Western A. Conference 1810 To the Present Conference 1811 ...... Also Bishop McKendree Received $25 from Each Conference amounting t0............ Expended from the W. A. Conference 1810 to the Present W. A. Conference 1811........ Remaining in the Hands of the Committee... How applied To E. W. Bowman ............ Wit BG cscs ca keer ac bakne yew Bae ee aw To Harris for McEkelyea ...............45. William Lewis 5 Benjamin Edge 5 .......... Sela Pain 10 Jessee Walker 10 .............. Valentine Cook 10 Thos Lasley 5 ........... William Winans 10 Wm Michel 12.23 ....... Deficen- cies. D. Cnt. 183 Appropria- tions. D. Cnt. 00 70 00 52% 132 23 00 00 00 00 00 00 23 23 On motion made by William Burk that a Special Committe be appointed in a case of delicasy Respecting James Blair, William Burk proceeded to Nominate Robert Cloud, Moses Crume, and Eli Truitt the Confer- ence concured in the Nomination. The Conference proceeded in the Examination of the Charrecters of the Elders, James Ward, Anthony 184 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Houston, Caleb W. Cloud, Zadock B. Thackston and Richard Browning obtained Locations, Milton Ladd moved for a Cirtificate of Recommendation to the Vir- ginia Conference, the Conference are of Opinion that Said Recommendation be given him. John McClure Requested by Letter that the Conference would grant him a Location, the Conference are of opinion the (that) he be placed among the Superanuated, and that a letter be drawn up by the Financing Committe and Sent to him. Frederick Stire examined but some charges being Exibetted against him by James Guinn a Committe is appointed to hear the Charges, the Committe as fol- lows, John Sale, Saul Hinkle, Solomon Langdon, James Quinn and John Collins. Robert Cloud examined and as some Charges ly against him by James Quinn it is thought proper to appoint a Committe, and the following are appointed, James Guinn, John Sale, Saul Hinkle, Solomon Lang- don, and John Collins. The Conference Proceeded—an Appeal before the Conference by Jacob Addams who has been expelled at the Quarterly Meeting Conference held in Lexington Circuit October 17th 1810 for Purchasing a Negro wom- an and child with Speculative motives, the Conference decide against him in favor of what the Quarterly Meeting Conference had done. WEDNESDAY MorninG BisHop McKENDRED IN TIE HAIR. James Blair moved that for convenience William Lamdin should be appointed to take the place of Rob- ert Cloud on the Special Committee who have been ap- pointed to try. his case, the Cen neenee voted in favor of the motion. James Ward laid before the Conference a petition forwerded by the Local Preachers praying that they The Journal for 1810. 185 may (?) Elders orders, the Conference are of opinion that it be laid over for further consideration. Milton Ladd from the Committe of Review proceeded to Report as far as they had progressed on duely Ex- amining, Bareblows &c, are of an opinion that it should be discountenanced, approved by the Conference. 2nd Examined a Shock to Shakerism. are of opinion that it contains Some Sound arguments &c but that it Should not be Patronised by the Conference, the Con- ference of opinion that the Shock to Shakerism, So far as the Sample is before them contains Some Sound arguments, William Burk Motioned that the Committe of Revieu address the Author with a Respectable Note. 8rd Examined a Manuscript on the subject of Slav- ery, are of Opinion that Contains Nothing New, the Conference are of opinion that a Respectful Note be addressed to the Author advising him not to Print it. Eli Truitt one of the Committe in the case of James Blair moved that two more be appointed to assist with them, Henry Mallory and Ralph Lotspiech Nominated and Elected. Caleb W. Cloud Moved for Readmition as Supernum- ary the Conference Readmit him. WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON BisHorp McKENDREE IN THE CHAIR. The Presedent advise that two fast days be appointed for the next year, the Conference Vote that they be fixed on the third Friday in June and first Friday in October. Bishop McKendree moved that he obtain the previ- ledge of a Coppy of the rules of the Annual Conference and a Coppy of tthe Slave Rule. Carried in the affirma- tive. Tuirspay Mornine Bishop McKENpDRED IN THE CHaIR. Richard Browning applied by letter for a Location 186 The Rise of Methodism in the West. the Conference the Conference [sic] granted him said Location. : James Ward moved for Readmition the Conference Readmit him. Bishop McKendree brought forward the address of the Local Preachers laid before the Conference yester- day to be taken up and considered, Lawner Blackman accordingly Proceeded to read the Address, Solomon Langdon one of the Committe who was appointed in the case of F. Stier Moved for Postponing the consid- eration of the Address, until they Should Report, the Address postponed. John Sale Proceeded to read the Report &C, as fol- lows the Case of Frederick Stier: As their ware some Complaints from the Cumberland Des- trict, the Complaints were before a Committe consisting of John Sale, Solomon Langdon, James Quinn, John Collins and Saul Hinkle and was agetated before the Conference Nearly Half a day. F. Stiers made Concessions which gave the Conference Satisfaction and the Parties agree Amicably to Settle which was done in a Conference capacity. TuirspAy AFTERNOON BisHop McKENDREE IN THE CHAIR. John Collins moved that the Case of Robert Cloud be ‘brought from the committe, and that it come before the Conference, Carried in the affirmative. The Address of the Local Preachers before the Con- ference—Lawner Blackman moved that the Local Breth- ern who sent the Address be answered as follow (Viz) We have thought proper to Lay over your address for more Mature Consideration at our next Annual Con- ference when we Shall Choose our delegates for ihe Next General Conference Seconded by Samuel Parker. The Conference Voted in favor of the Motion. William Burk Motioned that a Letter be addressed to the Presedent whose name is Signed to the Local The Journal for 1810. 187 Preachers address, and the Conference are of opinion that Samuel Parker and Caleb W. Cloud be a Com- mitte to draw up Said Letter. Eli Truitt Reported from the Committe appointed in the Case of James Blair, and are of Opinion that he be Severly Reproved from the Chair William Burk Moved that the word Severely be Struck out the Con- ference approve the Motion the Report amended as fol- lows (Viz.) We the Committe appointed to Examine into the Case of J. Blair are of opinion from the face of the Evidence that he has been guilty of imprudent Conduct but their are so many Pal- liating Circumstances that we are of Opinion that he did not So act designedly and give it as our opinion that he shall be Repre- manded before the Conference by the Presedent and be advised to act with more Caution for the future. Signed in behalf of the Committe. ELI TRUETT. The Special Committe appointed to write an address to the Local Preachers thro their Presedent proceeded to read the address with an amendment the Conference approve of Said Address. The Character of F. Stier Examined before the Con- ference. The Case of Robert Cloud before the Conference. It was moved and Seconded that it be laid over to the Next Annual Conference. Carried in the affirmative. On motion Resolved that a Committe be appointed to take evedence and Prepare the business for next Annual Conference. Motioned that Robert Cloud appoint one and the Conference one. Carried in the affirmative. Solomon Langdon Nominated by R. Cloud. The Con- ference Voted for the Assistant Preacher of Fairfield Circuit as the other Except R. Cloud Should be ap- pointed to that Circuit, and in that Case the Presedent Elder Shall appoint one. The Character of Robert Cloud examined. 188 The Rise of Methodism in the West. The Committe appointed for the inspection of Books &c, Milton Ladd proceeded to read a note directed to B. Whitson 2nd a Note to Dr. Clarke on his Shock to Shakerism. Lawner Blackman from the Committe of Appropria- tions Proceeded to Read an address which was directed to be sent to John McClure. Received without amend- ment. The Notes to B. Whitson and Dr. Clarke Approved &e, Signed in and by order of the Conference. Witiiam Bors, Secretary. W. McKENnprREE. Nore 11.—Again in 1810 Bishop Asbury travels to the West- ern Conference through Pennsylvania, Ohio, and down into Ken- tucky. At Frankfort he finds “elegant accommodations pro- vided for those who make the laws, and those who break them; but there is no house of God.” He preaches at Shelbyville in the courthouse. He finds the Methodists all for camp-meetings, while “the Baptists are for public baptizing.” On November 1, which is Thursday, he notes that Conference began in great peace and good order, and that “there were twenty-six admit- ted.” On Sunday, the 4th, Bishop McKendree preached, while Bishop Asbury exhorted. After the election of McKendree to the episcopacy he seemed more and more to assume the heavier duties, especially in the Western Conference. Bishop Asbury came to this session of the Conference in what he calls a “sulky.” At the close of the Conference he sold the “sulky” and purchased a horse, “that I might more easily wind my way through the wilderness to Georgia.” (Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III., pages 293, 294.) The appointments for 1810, as given in the General Minutes, were as follows: Hotston District. Fredrick Stier, P. Elder, Holston, Thomas Trower. Saltville, Josiah Crawford. Nollichuckie, Samuel H. Thompson. French-Broad, William Pattison. Clinch, Samuel Hellums. Powell’s Valley, John Brown. The Journal for 1810. 189 Tennessee Valley, Thomas Hellums. Carter’s Valley, Richard Richards. CuMBERLAND District. Learner Blackman, P. Elder. Nashville, William B. Elgin. Red River, James Gwinn. Roaring River, Samuel King. Livingston, Peter Cartwright. Hartford, Marcus Lindsey. Duck River, Lewis Anderson. Elk, James Axley. Dixon, John Manley. Richland, John Cragg. Goose Creek, John Page. Henderson, John Lewis. St. Vincennes, Thomas Stilwell. Flint, John Phipps. Cash Creek, Thomas Kirkman. Kentucky District. John Sale, P. Elder. Limestone, Samuel C. Griffin, Matthew Nelson. Fleming, Caleb J. Taylor. Licking, James Leach. Lexington, C. Holliday, E. Truitt, Caleb W. Cloud. Hinkstone, Henry McDaniel, Henry Mallory. Sandy River, John Johnson. GREEN River District. William Burke, P. Elder. Green River, John Travis, John Crane. Barren, Samuel Sellers. Wayne, Nathan Pullum. Cumberland, Samuel West. Danville, Thos. Lasley, Baker Wrather. Salt River, Banjamin Edge. Shelby, James Ward, James Blair. Silver Creek, Isaac Lindsey. Mississippi District. Miles Harper, P. Elder. Natchez and Washington, Isaac Quinn. Wilkinson, William Houston. Natchez Circuit, Sela Paine, Fredrick D. Wimberly. Claiborne, John Henninger. Amit, Hezekiah Shaw. 190 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Rapids, Thomas Nelson. Washataw, John Jennings. Attakapas, William Winans. Inpi1aNA District. Samuel Parker, P. Elder. Illinois, Daniel Fraley. Missouri, Thomas Wright. Maramack, John McFarland. Cold Water, George A. Colbert. Cape Girardeau, Jesse Walker. Miami District. Solomon Langdon, P. Elder. Cincinnati, Benjamin Lakin, Wm. Young. Mad River, John Clingan. Union, John Collins. Scioto, Saul Henkle, Stephen Timmons. Deer Creek, Ralph Lotspeich, Joseph Haines. Enon, Walter Griffith. Pickaway, Alexander Cummins, James McMehan. White Oak, Isaac Pavey. White Water, Moses Crume. Delaware, Robert Cloud. Muskincum District. James Quinn, P. Elder. Fairfield, Francis Travis. Wills Creek, John Strange, Jacob Mills. West Wheeling, William Lambden, Michael Ellis. Marietta, David Young, Vivian Daniels. Little Kanawha, John Holmes, Guyandott, Jacob Turman. Letart Falls, Joseph Pigott. Knox, James B. Finley. Tuscarawa, James Dixon. Detroit, William Mitchell. XII. THE JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN ANNUAL CONFERENCE BEGUN & HELD AT CINCINNATI, STATE OF OHIO, OCTR. 1ST, 1811.7 MEMBERS. Those marked * were absent. Francis Asbury William McKendree Presidents Lawner Blackman John Sale William Burk James Quinn Samuel Parker Frederick Stier Miles Harper* Solomon Langdon P. Elders Thos. Trower* William Patterson Thos. Hellums James Gwin* Peter Cartwright James Axley John Page* Henry Mallory* Caleb W. Cloud John Travis Sam.] Sellars Thos. Lasley Benjn. Edge James ‘Ward Isaac Quinn* William Houston* Sela Payne* Jesse Walker Benjn. Lakin John Clingon John Collins Saul Hinkle* Ralph Lotspeich Moses Crume Robt. Cloud David Young John Holmes* William Mitchell Elisha W. Bowman John McClure* John Crane Saml King* John Cragg Josiah Crawford* Hezekiah Shaw John Henninger Jacob Turman Thos. Stilwell Lewis Anderson William Young* William Lambdin Richard Richards John Johnston Eli Truitt Thos. Kirkman William Winans* John Lewis William B. Elgin Tsaac Lindsey James Blair 192 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Turspay Morninc Brsaor McKenprer PRESIDENT. The Conference proceed to Elect a Secretary by bal- lot. Lawner Blackman was accordingly Elected. On motion Resolved that the Conference meet at 9 o’clock & adjourn at 12 o’clock. Meet again at 2 o’clock —adjourn at 5 o’clock. The Conference proceeded to Elect by ballot a com- mittee of appropriation & James Quinn, David Young, Samuel Parker, Frederick Stier & T. Stilwell were found to be duly Elected. The Conference proceeded to elect by an open vote a book committee. Robt. Cloud, Thos. Hellums & Wm. B. Elgin were nominated & duly elected. The Chair called for the reading of the rules adopted for the Gov- ernment of Conference while sitting—The Secretary proceeded to read them. The Conference adopted sd. Rules without amendment. Tursp. AFTERNOON BisHop McKENDREE PRESIDENT. The Conference proceeded to take up & answer the 3rd Question. Who are io be admitted into full con- nection? Bishop Asbury proceeded to examine the fol- lowing persons who stood eligible for admission—And John Manley, Saml. Hellums, Charles Holliday, Thos. Nelson, Saml. Thompson, John Brown, Francis Travis, Saml. West, James B. Finley, Alexander Cummins, & Henry McDaniel were admitted into full connection & elected to the Office of Deacons. Charles Holliday was elected (was elected) to the office of an Elder. He was in Deacons orders when admitted on trial. Michael Ellis & John Page admitted into full con- nection. Stephen Timmons’s case was considered & he discon- tinued. Saml. King was admitted into full connection. The Journal for 1811. 193 _ Henry McDaniel admitted into full connection Elect- ed to the office of a Deacon. WeEpDNESDAY 9 O’cLocK BisHop McCKENDREE PRBSIDENT. ‘The Conference received the accounts from the Preachers individually of the Monies they received the last year on their different Circuit & likewise to ex- amine the accounts of the Bishops & Presiding Elders. The Conference proceeded to make a draft on the Book Concern for 300 Dollars & on the Chartered fund for 100 Dollars Proceeded to receive the monies sent on from Nashville 5 Dollars, Hochocking 5 Dollars, Union 10 Dollars, West Wheeling 7 $ 19 Cents. The case of William Young was considered & in Con- sequence of his great debility of body voted that he should stand on the Minutes among the Superanuated & worn out Preachers. Lewis Anderson, William Lambdin, Richard Rich- ards, Eli Truit, John Johnston, Thos. Kirkman & John Lewis, examined before the Conference & found good. Eli Truit requested a Location (a location) the Con- ference granted him a location. WEDNESDAY 2 O’cLocK BisHop ASBURY PRESIDENT. The Conference Proceeded to the Election of Local Preachers. Michael Rouse a Local Preacher from the Licking Circuit was Elected to the Office of a Deacon. Jonathan Wilson a Local Preacher from Lexington Circuit, was elected to the office of a Deacon. John Vice, Absalom Hunt, David Anderson, & John Evans, Local Preachers from Hinkstone Circuit was elected to the Office of Deacons. James Griffin a Local Preacher from Claborn circuit was elected to the office of a Deacon. Robert Dongan a Local Preacher from the Flint Cir- euit elected to the office of a Deacon. 13 194 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Samuel Harvey a Local Preacher from Henderson Circuit was elected to the Office of a Deacon. Thos. Taylor a Local Preacher from the Hartford circuit was duly recommended; but not elected by the Yonference. Benjn. McReynolds a Local Preacher from Christian Ct. duly recommended but not elected by the Confer- ence in Consequence of his not having complied with the rule with regard to a Negroe man he holds as a Slave. Movd. by William Burk & seconded by L. Blackman that it be Stated to Benjn. McReynolds by word or Letter the reason of his rejection. Put to vote & Car- ried. Movd. by L. Blackman & seconded by James Quinn that the Presiding Elder who shall have charge where Benjn. McReynolds lives, be the person who shall give him the information voted by conference & like- wise make some statements to Thos. Taylor of the reason of his rejection put to vote & carried. John Gray a Local Preacher from White Water cir- cuit was elected to the office of a Deacon. John Clark a local Preacher from Cincinnatti Ct. was elected to the office of a Deacon. Jacob Delay a Local Preacher from Pickaway Ct. was elected to the office of a Deacon. Adbel Coleman a Local preacher from Cincinnatti Ct. was elected to the office of a Deacon. Joshua Holland a Local Preacher from White Water Ct. elected to the Office of a Deacon. 3 TuHurspay 9 OcLtockK BisHop McKENDREE PRESIDENT. The Conference proceeded with the election of Local Preachers. Samuel Brown a Local Preacher from Barren Circuit was elected to the Office of a Deacon. The Journal for 1811. 195. John Clark a Local Preacher from Cincinnatti Cir- cuit was elected to the Office of a Deacon. Joseph Stockton a local Preacher from White Oak not elected. Reuben Row a Local Preacher from Deer Creek Cir- cuit elected to the Office of a Deacon. William Kermes a Local Preacher from West Union Circuit elected to the Office of a Deacon. Benjamin Spry a Local Preacher from Wills Creek Circuit elected to the Office of a Deacon. George Akin a local Preacher from French Broad Circuit not elected. The case of Edward Scott a Local Preacher from Chillicothe before the Conference who appealed from the decision of the Quarterly Meeting Conference of Deer Creek circuit who had suspended him from Official Services in the Church. The Charges being read for which sd Scott was suspended. He proceeded to State the reason why he appealed & to make his defence he- fore the Conference. The minutes of the Quarterly Meeting Conference were read & laid before this Con- ference. ad Tuurspay 2 Octock BisHop McKENDREE PRESIDENT. The Conference resumed the case of Edward Scotts Appeal Thos. Scott & Thos. Hinds members of the Quar- ter Meeting held for Deer Creek Ct. proceeded to make some Statements relative to the Appeal the Question was called for, but the previous question being call’d for, was carried without debate & lost. The main Question was then called for which was stated as follows, Shall we or Shall we not confirm the Judgement of the Quarterly Meeting Conference? The vote being taken in the positive; The Judgement of the Quarterly Meeting Conference was confirmed. 196 The Rise of Methodism in the West. The Conference Proceeded in the examination of the Deacons; & William B. Elgin & Isaac Lindsey was ex- amined—no charges against them. The Conference proceeded to examine the Character of those who were eligible for Elders orders, John Cragg Elected to the Office of an Elder. Josiah Crawford not elected in consequence of some charges stated against him by James Axley. Hezekiah Shaw not elected—he requested a Location. The Conference granted him a Location. John Henninger, Jacob Turman, & Thos. Stilwell elected to the Office of Elders. Movd. and seconded that the Conference meet on Fri- day morning at 8 Oclock put to vote & carried. Fripay 8 Octock BisHop McKENpDREE PRESIDENT. Movd. by Solomon Langdon seconded by William Burk that the case of Edward Scott be reconsidered the Question was taken in the affirmative. Carried. The Conference proceeded to the examination of the characters of the Preachers who remain on trial. John McFarland and Matthew Nelson continued on trial. The Conference took up & reconsidered the case of Edward Scott. Some statements were made. The Questions was called for. But the previous question being call’d for was taken without debate Lost. The main Question was then stated whether this Conference set aside the Judgement of the Quarterly Meeting Con- ference or not put to vote Carried against the Judge- ment of the Quarterly Meeting Conference. Fripay 3 Octock BisHop McKENpREE PRESIDENT. Samuel Parker from the Committee of Appropriation proceeded to report. Which report was received by the Conference, as follows: The Journal for 1811. 197 THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE oF APPROPRIATIONS. D. Cnt. (Viz) Deficiencies ..... 0... ccc cece cece c env eeees | 3,042 61% To meet the above Difficiencies Draft on the book concern $300.............4. 300 00 Draw on the Charter fund ..................- 100 00 Extra Collections, Hockhochking Ct. ......... 5 00 Nashville Circuit ......... 0... cece cece ee eens 5 00 WOT CIP CUTE vse snics oangin re Ae Geet is Gees hie aceite 10 00 West Wheeling Ct. ......... cece cece ee eee eens 719 $ 427 19 Money Money Received. Appropriated. D. Cnt. D. Cnt. Hrancis ASDULY sic. iuie cadens Seas Saueesil) Guedes 31 00 Wm, McKendree: ese sicsics suave vas cvcesta] 2 aaws 10 00 Wy Burk: gecicctsdesdiga setae ougas exe ce 140 02 | ..... JOhD ‘Sale toe eas si geedins wrcnldea wake so waa ae 17033 | wears Lawner Blackman ............ee eee eee sees 80 00 | ..... JaMes: QUINN, os sages Seaws cde seid gees 114 00 | ..... Sawmuel Parke ssccccsiaewwsevewnesweg naires || cesta Ib auaaere POPEGETICK Stled> cei acess ctelsrace Me-h siamieeeed ore 80 00 | .....- Miles: Harper’ «ce vuncsuv taiewe wcmecccie ce emesis) saa | yates Solomon Langdon ........... cece ee ee eee eee 124 02 | ..... THOS. TLROWE? 2s: casien cadesncingen ow omnes 70 00 | ..... William Patterson .........ccee ese e eee e eee 80 00 | ..... Thos. Hellims: |: s%.cy satin. caeess wee rake 5495 | ..... JAMES: ‘GWAN screeds aadueuie we alaeae od Bauscerne mage 95 00 | ..... Peter Cartwright, 9 months ............... 18 31 26 69 JAMES AX CY ies ssésera ce deccriates ado hems Caer 44 AD | ees TORN Page: g033 5:4 asia s oudguanw waned ew nin 94 sine & 80 00 | ..... Thos; ‘Stilwell. isas.ccs sew v aves ecamias vane es 13 124%| 16 88 Henry Mallory’ .-.c:asi 3 sawed swes ives es ee 83°12) | asees Caleb Hye Cloud cececcisiaaeetutiwseenoee esis! sever |) - deaths OWT Tra VIS sales ccstrerss trata cuussomedvayaie aoa augied ated anecors BOSS. |i) culate Samuel Sellers ........ cece cece e eee eee e eee 37-00: | was "THOS JGaSlOY: s ssciecAnn sinha exiied seers oan 80 00 | ..... Benjn; WdS6 wsc2 swe eneisae ca diwoeusers sau é 67 00 | ..... James Ward. seis osev sciences sada os aad ead nays 118 75 [| ..... Tsaae Quinn, <2:sserssiemrceeeghiceaptasiows | vssaa. | aaaes William FOUst0Tni acc isccciiis ernie ceceineiedereed, enee: || epenne S618 PA yan siassicia ssa dua nedianmdi ocd aresen go eeenetecacaradecel|l) | sereveveiny |) iacdieuars Jesse Walkker ciesexisis sis aura sree oo sete wiaieras 32 00 28 00 Benjns Lain sia oasis veo se be gsc oe sigies wea wears 151 05 | «..... John Clingeon) sess vee se wis cee wees eens e ae ciee 80 00 | ..... John, Gollins: sas +3 ss4 82800225 ee ees Sern ae dae 1384 52 | ..... Saul Hinklé: oc iscieds ccd eceasess Gowns sows 160 00 | ..... JOHN. Manly a sicesccs ea eds ands ve owa ss Wes ees as 5207 | .caee Francis TraviS ...cccsccoscscccvcccensseuce 57 00 | ..... FONT. BLOWN vie eres. oveco sue duee paid waneg oe B8cein TS ieee 80 00 | ..... Charles Holliday ..........c. cece cee eseeeee 160 00 | ..... Frederick D. Wimberly ........0.ecceceeeee] eevee | cece John Jennings ....-.-cccsecececccererecece eeeee eoeee 198 The Rise of Methodism in the West. John McFarland ............c cee e ec ee veces Matthew Nelson .........e.c ee ceeeee teen ees Bake? Rather 2 sii eke tace doe sles weer den ayes JAMES SD IKON “Sea, saersed.c: 4 suaus acuadveisuaoa. aadeduh vere aienene Se Jacob Mills, 6 months .............0.. 0000s SEHOS: “Wright: -scais-ss nis be dageie es Sota era mie oe James Gi Leach, 02 ia siedecc estas ceareaece cw ons JOSCph Haines, siece eae d deseo G8 o3-3 wees Walter Grumth. 6 sicicbs bi eaiee seins octet 26 Bas T;. LOtspereh i 64 sees cde srs Heed ake eee Ss MOS6S ‘Crum: << séice-cidgie ve vies bod Se rane tieceee 6 RODt: ‘CLOW: os ssid d- tteaee oe scandens sea bas academe Dayid: VOUNE cs sass iw gate whuigertairo tawateae JOH TIGNES: osiaecuacdavie aga dateac le Seine William Mitchell ............... ec cece eee Bi. Ws, BOWMAN, sijaiiccs aa canvorine pees eaees JOBN Crane sisiieessccsaice ved is vera eedioss SJ ODT SM CCIUPE 55.5596 saved o.ovaviers erate done Sie a 300% SAMUEL KING «is eo snd eens 6 saad omwarenearss POND) “CRBS scccrsscicrerateasauaigns sie sige Ha whsseny COUR 8 Josiah Crawford. ..o.8i% doses sn ee dames caw s Hezekiah Shaw’ . s.isssas ese see ssewe acon s John Henninger ........ cece cece cece eee SACOD: WUBI: eiese. sieice Goes usues gon. Sum oo Geaesce weeetevars "WilHAM YOUNE 5 6x06 sacs tresses tae.d gre gece ares Lewis Anderson ............ cece eee eee eee William Lambdin ............ cc cece ee eens Richard Richards s<:ss00s«sicasstcae os vee JOHN, JOHNStOD sé i.cicieinse sass. dea. e ge ee oo SHS Eli Truitt, 44% months .................6.. THOS), Kirkinany «0 sssiaa stows Soa wiens owsiee-ae ghee William. Winans: sso. 6 ovens 5 ersiees veaiew-e-a avs John, Lewis) sss eas sawed ness esdcawe tan ve xan William B. Blgin -iscvssscsecs ce sss eewaeens Isaac Lindsey jo... goak sx hishew os aves 0A are Fea James Blair, & MONE <2 206 c0ceaarcdear sans JAMES B. FIBIGY 6.4 aed sd weee vedads aha eek ThOS;. NGISON. ss ecageckisc vide cee sigh 044 Geee eee Sam. SWies be s. suiscid greenies Acete price, ore csvetec exsce fale: havaus Alex: CUMMINS ssa s egovave sce es wros oe 6 ae Sams: Meum) a4: 50 seis eeuinwe vwales saree vo ae Saml. H. Thompson ...........ccceeeeeeeee Henry McDaniel ......... cece ceccee ce eecees PNOSs: Ass. TRANS esdiecs kee eeractindes repent c Wee cere Saml.. S:-Grifhm: soc sieiiies ecieis o's eevee eo as Daniel. Fraley 063i 6cisieescaacisa acdsee ev ae JODN, Stranse. seas scien asawy caawsee aawes ex James MéeMahan .ssvea cs teavciuas sagaene gs Michael WOUES: cs ie sccsergsce ead s ee aseeaes Pe ace ea eve Joseph Piggott ..... cece ew eeccccncvccsses Wiv1OD Daniel coc ciseesies wenievaesiaie oa sieges a Money Received. Cnt. 11 00 80 00 80 00 Money . Appropriated. D. Cnt. sees cee ee eee ee eee see eee er eee sees ee eee eeeee ween wea ee eee eee ete ee eee eeeee The Journal for 1811. 199 Money Money Caleb: Js Lavlor’ iar isscieie sc emmys cnet se nee’ 66 00 | ....- Isaac; Davey” és sca ss news exes etwex ss ieee s 160 00 | ..... Marcus: Lindséy® nie is nde cadgadesswesasaaieee| acid L ceseecs George A. Calvert --| 23 00 7 00 Nathan Pullum ............ cece eee e eee aeee 49 00 | ..... DORN! PHD DS 6.5 sce ie dea since cavwisinte sep siei-s shee Ghere 48 00 | ..... 387 62 Yet in reserve $ 31.00 John Hennigar 3 00 Public Collection 52 37 Thos. Wright 15 00 Collection Preachers 36 66 Jesse Walker 10 40 John Sale 10 00 Wm. Young 12 75 Alex. Cummins 6 00 $130 03 Danl. Fraley 5 00 Necessitous cases Doll S. Parker 6 70 Saml. Lewis 15 00 F. Stilwell 5 00 John Johnston 17 00 John Strange 5 00 Marcus Lindsey 600 John McFarland 5 00 John Cragg 5 00 EH. W. Bowman 5 00 George Calvert 6 00 . Jacob Turman 2 00 78 86 Wm. Mitchell 2 00 53 00 53 00 $133 86 The Conference resumed the examination of those who remain on trial. Baker Rather, James Dixon, Thomas Wright, Walter Griffith, Thos. A. King, John Phipps, Daniel Fraley, John Strang, James McMahan, Caleb J. Taylor, Isaac Pavey, Marcus Lindsey, & George A. Calvert. All continued on trial. Sat. 9 Octock BisHor McKENpDREE PRESIDENT. The case of James Blair before the Conference & con- tinued by adjournment during Mond. & Tuesday till 12 Oclock at which time the final decision took place. The Committee who examined his Case Last April before William Burk Presented 14 charges Three of which the 9th. 10th. & 11th for want of proper testimo- ny was not acted on by the Committee. 200 The Rise of Methodism in the West. DECISIONS OF THE CONFERENCE AGAINST BLAIR. Charge the 8rd. the Conference confirm the report of the com- mittee. Charge 4, Guilty of imprudent conduct. Charge 5th. It is the opinion of the Conference that the con- duct of J. Blair as it relates to the above charge was highly imprudent & his observations about Miss .... was highly im- proper. Charge 6th. Conference voted his conduct improper. Charges 13th. Conference voted him guilty. PALLIATING CONSIDERATIONS. 1. The irregularity of the Process at the beginning—having been in public. 2. Want of Specification. Consequently the charges could not be assertained till Testimony was examined & thus it appeared that some of the charges were supported by a single witness & that witness was the accuser. 38rd. Some Charges originated in Private jiueceaien some from his exercise in congregations in open day—when the work of God was going powerfully among the People. 4. The time when the testimony was taken was at a Crisis when there was considerable agitation & much irritation among the People witnesses & Parties this was plainly manifested. The Conference after duly & deliberately weighing all those charges & circumstances taken together voted his Suspension from all official services in our Church.- Tunsp. 2 Octock BisHorp McKENDREE PRESIDENT. The Conference proceeded to answer the question, Who are admitted on Trial? Kentucky District. John Cord from Limestone, John Colleman from Flemming Circuit, Francis Landrin from Fleming Ct. Jonathan Stamper from Lexington Ct. all admitted. Stephen Grimes from Hinkston Ct. rejected. But on motion of James Ward the Conference granted ‘the Presiding Elder liberty to employ him if he should think Proper. The Journal for 1811. 201 Miami District. Elias Turner from Scioto Ct. a married man ad- mitted, Jesse Spurgion from Pickaway Ct. a married man admitted, Henry Jefferson from Scioto Ct. rejected, James Holmes from White Water circuit Do. Soda Bacon from Delaware Ct. rejected, P. E. obtained leave to employ him. Robt. W. Finley from West Union cir- cuit a married man admitted. Green River District. Joseph Oglesby from Jefferson Ct. a married man ad- mitted, on Motion of Wm. Burk admitted into full con- nection. Charles Bonwell from Salt River Ct. admitted. Holston District. George Akins from French Broad Circuit married & admitted. Benj. Rotin from French Broad Ct. admitted. Jesse Cunningham from French Broad, Richard Conn from French Broad Ct. admitted. Thos. D. Porter from Nolichuckie admitted. The Conference Proceeded to the examination of the Character of D. Wimberly & John Jennings admitted into full connection & elected to the order of Deacons. Muskingum District. William Dixon from Little Kanawha admitted, Charles Waddle from Wills Creek Ct. admitted, William Mc- Mahan from Marietta admitted. Wen. 9 Octock BisHop McKENDREn PRESIDENT. John McMahan from Marietta Ct. admitted. IWinois District. Larry Killibrew from Missouri Ct. rejected, on Mo- tion of the P. E. the Conference granted the P. Elder liberty to employ him if he should think proper. 202 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Cumberland District. Samuel Bellamy from Red River Ct. admitted. David Goodner from Hartford Ct. admitted. Shadrach B. Carter from Duck River circuit admit- ted. William Hart from Red River circuit admitted, Saml. S. Lewis from Christian Ct. Joseph Foulks from Livingston Ct. admitted. The case of Marcus Lindsey who remains on trial was considered who was wanted to fill the Missionary Station on Sandy in consequence of which he was elected to the office of a Deacon. The case of Thos. Trower was considered who re- quested a Location the Conference granted it. Henry Mallory’s case was considered who requested a location the Conference granted it. Saul Hinkle’s case was considered who requested a Location. The Conference granted it. Saul Hinkle’s case was considered who requested a Location. The Conference granted it. John McClure’s case was considered, William Burk motioned that John McClure be continued in his re lation to this conference as a Superanuated & worn out Preacher put to vote carried. The Conference proceeded to decide whether they should send their delegates to General Conference by Seignority or by election, put to vote carried in favor of sending them by election. Wep. 2 Octock BisHop McKeEnprere PrasipEnt. Mov’d by William Burk seconded by John Sale that the Case of Edward Tiffins appeal be admitted. Put to vote conference admitted it. Mov’d by William Burk & Seconded by James Quinn that it be laid over as unfinished business. The Ques- The Journal for 1811. 203 tion was call’d for & taken without debate. Lost. The main question was taken—carried in the affirmative. The Conference voted that they elect the Delegates for General Conference by Ballot. The Conference Pro- ceeded to make their election the following persons were duly elected: Samuel Parker, David Young, John Sale, James Quinn, L. Blackman, F. Stier, John Collins, Jas. Ward, B. Lakin, James Axley, Wm. Patterson, Tsaac Quinn & Wm. Houston. THursp. 9 OcLockK BisHop McKENDRED PRESIDENT. The Conference examined the Character of the Eld- ers one by one. The case of Samuel Sellars who owned a negro Slave of 14 years old. he agreed to submit to the advice of a committee one chosen by himself and the other by the Conference—the Committee reported as follows: We the committee appointed in the case of S. Sellars are of oppinion that the Black boy shall serve him until he be 22 years of age. WM. Bork, F. STIer. TuHurspay 2 Octock BisHop McK@&NDREE PRESIDENT. Bishop Asbury proceeded to examine the Preachers who had been admitted on trial. The case of Robt. Cloud—as there were some difficul- ties the last year in Consequence of which Solomon Langdon & the Preacher of Fairfield Circuit were ap- pointed to make enquiry in Robert Cloud’s case & re- port to this Conference See Page 88. The case of E. W. Bowman—There were objections stated against him for wearing weapons calculated to inspire terror & for threatening what he would do. The question called for & stated whether the conduct as it respected the above circumstances of E. W. Bowman be disproved of or not put to vote carried in the affirma- tive that such conduct be disapproved of. 204 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Fripay 9 Octock BisHorp McKENpREE PRESIDENT. The Conference proceeded to answer the Question, Where shall the next Conference be held? nominated Fountain Head Sumner County Tennessee & Chillicothe, Provided the Western Conference be divided by the General Conference. Voted that the Lower Conference be held at the Fountain Head on the 10th. of Nov. 1812, And that the Upper Conference be held at Chilicothe on the, October 1st. 1812. Fripay 2 OcLtock BisHop McKENpDREE PRESIDENT. The case of Edward Tiffin a local Preacher came be- fore the Conference—who appealed from the Judgement of the Quarterly Meeting Conference of Deer Creek Cir- cuit. Joseph S. Collins from Chilicothe made some statements proving the illegality of the Proceedings in the Process of the trial of Edward Tiffin. The Confer- ence left it with the Episcopacy to decide whether the proceedings were consistant with the Methodist Dis- cipline or not. It was decided by the Episcopacy that the Q Committee was not conformable to the laws of religion that the case of Edward Tiffin ought not to have been submited to the Q Committe therefore its improper for it to come before this Conference. The case of W. Winans considered. Charges pre- fered against him, but as he was not present his case was laid over till he can return from the Mississippi District. James Ward stated he could not with Propriety go to the General Conference. In consequence of which the Conference elect Thos. Stilwell to take his place. The Conference Decided that if no division be made in the Western Annual Conference that the Preachers all meet at Chilicothe October 1st. 1812. L. Birackman, Secretary. W. McKunoree. The Journal for 1811. . 205 Nott 12.—The annual tour of the circuits and Conferences brought Bishop Asbury early in September, 1811, into Ohio, bound for the Western Conference to convene in Cincinnati. He finds camp meetings going on in many of the circuits and he preaches frequently in the camps. At Springfield he preaches, but his service is interrupted by a general muster of militia. At Dayton he preaches in the courthouse, where about a thou- sand hearers assembled. He mentions finding many old ac- quaintances in Ohio whom he had known in the older States, At Lebanon he helps the people plan for a new church of brick, to be forty by sixty feet. He arrives in Cincinnati on September 27, and on the Sunday following ordains twenty preachers, among them James B. Finley. Great crowds attended the Con- ference, for he tells us, “We occupied the market-house as well as the chapel.” He states, “I had little trouble about the sta- tions—I heard of no complaints. There were one hundred and two preachers: one hundred of whom are stationed: we lack twenty-two.” (Asbury’s Journal, Vol. III., pages 316-318.) The appointments for 1811, as given in the General Minutes, were as follows: Houston District. Frederick Stier, P. Elder. Holston, Lewis Anderson, Jesse Cunningham. Nollichuckie, Samuel Sellers. French-Broad, George Elkins, Josiah Crawford. - Clinch, Sam’] Thompson, Rich. Conn. Powell’s Valley, Thomas A. King. Carter’s Valley, John Henninger. Tennessee Valley, William B. Elgin. CUMBERLAND District. James Guinn, P. Elder. Red River and Goose Creek, Isaac Lindsey, John Manley, John A. Lewis. Roaring River, Thomas Kirkman, Wayne, John Phipps. Somerset, Shadrach B. A. Carter. Green River, James Dixon. Barren, Richard Richards. NASHVILLE District, Learner Blackman, P. Elder. Dixon, John Cragg. Duck River, John Crane. Richland and Flint, Thomas Stilwell, David Goodner. 206 The Rise of Methodism in the West. Elk, Joseph Foulks, Samuel Belamy. Cany Fork, John Page. Nashville, Samuel King. WasasuH District. James Azley, P. Elder. St. Vincennes, Jacob Turman. Patoka, Benjamin Edge. Cash River, Baker Wrather. Livingston, John Travis. Christian, Peter Cartwright. Henderson, William Hart. Hartford, Francis Travis. Kentucky District. John Sale, P. Elder. Sandy River, Marcus Lindsey. Limestone, Henry McDaniel, Caleb J. Taylor. Fleming, Samuel Hellums. Licking, Thomas D. Porter. Lexington, Chas. Holliday, John Stamper. Hinkstone, Matthew Nelson, Benjamin Rhoten. Sat River DISTRIcT. James Ward, P. Elder. Danville, Thomas Lasley, John Caliman. Cumberland, Thomas Hellums. Madison, Thomas Nelson. Salt River, Joseph Oglesby. Shelby, William Pattison. Jefferson, Charles Bonwell. Silver Creek, William McMehan. MississiePi District. Samuel Dunwody, P. Elder. Wilkinson, Sela Paine, Lewis Hobbs. Natchez, John Johnson, Samuel Lewis. Claiborne, John W. Kennon. Amit, William Winans. Rapids, Fredrick D. Wimberly. Washataw, Thomas Griffin. Attakapas, John S. Ford. Tombeckbee, Wm. Houston, Isaac Quinn. New Orleans, Miles Harper. Inuinois District. Samuel Parker, P. Elder. Illinois, Jesse Walker, George A. Colbert. Missouri, John Cord. The Journal for 1811. 207 Maramack, Thomas Wright. Cold Water, Daniel Fraley. Cape Girardeau, John McFarland. Miami District. Solomon Langdon, P. Elder. Cincinnati, William Burke, John Strange. Mad River and Xenia, John Collins, Moses Crume. Scioto, Ralph Lotspeich. Deer Creek, Robert Cloud, Chas. Waddle. Lawrenceburg, Walter Griffin. Pickaway, James McMehan. White Oak, Benjamin Lakin, Eli Turner. Salt Creek, Jesse Spurgeon. White Water, Robert W. Finley. Delaware, Alexander Cummins. Bush Creek, Isaac Pavey. Muski1neum District. James Quinn, P. Elder. Fairfield, Isaac Quinn, James B. Finley. Marietta, David Young, Thomas Branch. Little Kanawha, John Brown. Guyandott, Samuel West. Letart Falls, William Nixon, Knox, Elisha W. Bowman. Tuscarawas, William Mitchell. RA — — a SS LRA \ SS \ \ AK \ \ \\ oo CX WAY \ NY WY NY \\ NY AK \ — \ QQ ~ \\ \ \\ ~~ \ A WN