= eee eeeaee eat eee te A lea Popltaraneitcds wa besa (keke Ppp toes pars Cea la eieeet aoe ar ie. Ae clan ete a - Wea ce : Seer a : See enee ere ee Sais bette tee ee > Se ree ; es Spcteta kr tae eee ernest cea ae Tes re s . Se ert ‘ ieee patio i ee Sede diee eke ee ee eat Sat ; Benes mieten i ee ee Te a - _ beater aie ‘ Penastaiettenn eee pete eee ee ei egret AG (02, LGHE7r CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ornell Un Library n F 6 H67 History of Litchfield il Connecticu c 1924 028 841 860 vers WA iti Date Due HISTORY LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT, * WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES PROMINENT MEN AND PIONEERS. PHILADELPHIA: J. W. LEWIS & CO., 1881. oy 2 O33, N76 679b A. H. W. L. E. 0. 469 PREFATORY. THE province of the historian is to gather the threads of the past ere they elude forever his grasp, and weave them into a harmonious web, to which the “art preservative” may give immor- tality ; therefore he who would rescue from oblivion the deeds of a community, and send them on to futurity in an imperishable record, should deliver “a plain, unvarnished tale,”— “Nothing extenuate, Nor aught set down in malice.’ “ In such a spirit have the compilers of the following pages approached the work of detailing the history of the county embodied herein, and trust they have been fairly faithful to the task imposed. It has been our honest endeavor to trace the history of the development of this section from that period when it was in the undisputed possession of the red men to the present, and to ‘place before the reader an authentic narrative of its rise and progress to the prominent position it now occupies among the counties of New England. That such an undertaking is attended with no little difficulty and vexation none will deny ; the aged pioneer relates events of the early settlements, while his neighbor sketches the same events with totally different outlines. Man’s memory is ever at fault, while Time paints a different picture upon every mind. With these the historian has to contend; and while it has been our aim to compile an accurate history, were it devoid of all inaccuracies that perfection would have been attained of which the writers had not the faintest conception, and which Lord Macaulay once said never could be reached. From colonial and other documents in the State archives, from county, town, and village records, family manuscripts, printed publications, and innumerable private sources of informa- tion, we have endeavored to produce a history which ‘should prove accurate, instructive, and in every respect worthy of the county represented. How well we have succeeded in our task a generous public, jealous of its reputation and honor, of its traditions and triumphs, must now be the judge. We desire to acknowledge our sincere thanks to the editorial fraternity generally for much valuable information, which has greatly lessened our labor in the preparation of this work, and also to each and every one who has assisted in its compilation, and would cheerfully make per- sonal mention of each, but it is impracticable, as the number reaches over a thousand. PHILADELPHIA, June 10, 1881. CONTENTS. ELISTORICA TL. CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE. Geographical—Topographical—Organization of Litchfield County—Lo- cation of County-Seat—Conflicting Claims—Tirst County Officiale— County Buildings—List of Sheriffs, Treasurers, Clerks, and State’s At- torneys from 1751 to 1882—Chief Judges Court of Common Pleas from LT51 to 1854......scccersecerecereoes ansesseesseciseasan Segacssveety saatesney oneness 13 CHAPTER II. BencH AND BAR z 14 CHAPTER III. Mepicat History. Organization of Medical Association in 1767—Early Physicians—Names of Members of Medical Society from 1808, with Dates of Admission— List of Presidents and Secretaries from 1808 to 1881—Present Members — Present OM CerS iv.1.05.svessvessccaesantecencesestereecvessseveeemcaceecssveceedyes 48 CHAPTER IV. Miuirary History. The Second Regiment—The Fifth Regiment—The Eighth Regiment— The Ninth Regiment—The Tenth Regiment—The Eleventh Regiment —The Twelfth Regiment—The Thirteenth Regiment... 50 CHAPTER V. Miuirary Hisrory (Continued). THE NINETRENTH REGIMENT......ssecccsceesseeees ee ssaaeccscnsenssscceessesecese 53 CHAPTER VI. Miuitary History (Continued). The Twenty-third Regiment—The Twenty-eighth Regiment — First Regiment Heavy Artillery......... a astauslieeauy sacsereoncgssess's wesdessyecoasves 98) CHAPTER VII. InTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS. The Housatonic Railroad—The Naugatuck Railroad—The Connecticut Western—The Shepaug—The New Haven and Northampton...... 100 CHAPTER VIII. PoruLation AND ScHoou STArIsTIcs. Population of Litchfield County... 104 CHAPTER IX. LitcHFieLp. Geographical—Topographical—The Indian Purchase—The Explorations of the Township—List of Proprietors—The Town Divided into Sixty Shares—Court of Probate, 1719—Original Cost of the Town—One Penny Three Farthings per Acre—The Patent of Litchfield—The First Settle- ments—Names of Pioneers—‘ House Lots”—The Pioneer Homes—The Forts—Indian Depredations—Incident—Litchfield in the French War, 1755-63—Names of Soldiers 105 CHAPTER X. LitcHFiep (Continued), Firat Indications of Revolutionary Spirit in Litchfield—Letter of Aaron Burr—The First Company of ‘Soldiers—Capt. Bezaleel Beebe—The Bowling Green Statue of George III. Demolished—Carried to Litch- field—Converted into Cartridges—Continental Stores—Army Work- shops—Prisoners of War—Arrest of David Matthews, Mayor of New York—Conveyed to Litchfield—Governor Franklin a Prisoner here— Visit of Count Rochambeau and Gen. Lafayette—Gen. Washington Visits the Village—Various Votes of the Town—Rev. Judah Cham- pion’s Prayer—Resident British Soldiers—Incidents, etc., etc........ 110 CHAPTER XI. LitcHFIELD (Continued). Ethan Allei—Elisha Sheldon—Oliver Wolcott—Andrew Adams—Beza- lee] Beebe—Jedediah Strong—Benjamin Talmadge—Tapping Reeve— Moses Seymour—Elisha Mason........ svetecase ase peeieenseeanwacesi apileawens 120 CHAPTER XII. LircuFIeLp (Continued), Congregational Church, Litchfield—Congregational Church, Milton— Congregational Church, Northfield—St. Michael’s Church, Litchfield— Methodist Church, Litchfield—St. Paul’s Church, Bantam Falls— Trinity Church, Milton—Baptist Church, Bantam Falls—Roman Cath- olic Church, Litchfield. . 129 CHAPTER XIII. LircnrreLp (Continued). The Village of Litchfield—Incorporation—First Officers—Presidents and Clerks from 1818 to 1882—Borough Organization—The Press—The Weekly Monitor and American Advertiser—The Witness—The Edi- tors Convicted of Libel—Imprisoned—Political Excitement throughout Immediate and Distant States—Grand Oration to the Imprisoned Editor—Excitement in the Town—The Litchfield Gazette—The Litch- field Journal—The Litchfield Republican—The Miscellany — The American Eagle—The Litchfield County Post—The Litchfield En- quirer—The Litchfield Democrat—The Litchfield Sun—The Mercury —The Democratic Watchman—The Litchfield Republican—The Litch- field Sentinel—The Litchfield Law-School—The Post-Office—Banks— Savings Society—Insurance Company—“Spring Hill”—St. Paul’s Lodge, No. 11, F. and A. M.—Minerals—Temperance in 1789—Slavery in Litchfield—Bantam Falls—Northfield—Milton—Biographical Notes —College Graduates—Physicians—Lawyers... CHAPTER XIV. LircuFrieLp (Continued). Incorporation of the Town—First Town Officers Elected—Representa- tives from 1740-1882—Military History ...........cccceccseseeees epaseslotexes 152 CHAPTER XV. WINCHESTER, Geographical—Topographical—List of Proprietors of Winchester—A llot- ment of Lands—Survey, etc.—Indian History—First Conveyance of Land — First Roads— The Pioneers—Their Locations—Incidents of Pioneer Life—Initial Events—Reminiscences of Mrs. Swift—The First Forge—The Pioneer Grist-Mill—The First Saw-Mill —The Revolution —Names of Soldiers, etc.—Assessment Roll] of 1783.. seagate LOL CHAPTER XVI, WincuHester (Continued). Pioneers in Winsted Society—Manufacturing Interests—The Winsted Bank—The Hurlbut Bank—The Hurlbut National Bank—The First National Bank—The Winsted National Bank—The Winsted Savings Bank—The Mechanics’ Savings Bank—St. Andrew Lodge, No. 64, F. v vi CONTENTS. and A. M.—Meridian Chapter—Tyrian Council—Orion and Union Lodges, I. 0. of O. F.—Temperance Organizations—Palmer Post— Knights of Pythias—Libraries—Early Schools—The Winsted Herald— The Winsted Press—The Winsted News—Post-Office Difficulties—List of Old Inhabitants—The Borough of Clifton—The Borough of Winsted —Incorporation—First Officers Elected—Wardens from 1858 to 1881— Burgesses from 1858 to 1881—Clerks, Treasurers, and Bailiffs from 1858 to 1881—Water-Works—Fire Department, etc.—Population of Town Frei 1756 Wo 1880 comamnuonnsovemevawanrianiseiereeamenntonseniemiiis: 186 CHAPTER XVII. WINCHESTER (Continued) daa ie snveatea aseatas (aidss eM dee semceewseeaes 198) CHAPTER XVIII. Wincuester (Continued). First Congregational Church, Winchester—First Congregational Church, Winsted—Second Congregational Church—Methodist Episcopal Church —St. James’ Church—St. Joseph’s Church—The Women’s Christian | MOMPSrance Unio wsss cscs seveedeesteaacuccccceessesvsesseveaninavedssneesGeedacte 206 CHAPTER XIX. WINCHESTER (Continued). Incorporation of the Town—First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected— Documentary History—List of Senators—Representatives—Judges of Probate—Town Clerks—Selectmen—Military Record......s..000. 216 CHAPTER XX. BARE HAMSTE D cosa ssascsussvecasosyressssvssvorsitesvedasedsdeddereessacdevecosvesseeds 237 CHAPTER XXI. BARKAAMSTED (Contintedd) 1: sessssesesseeceesesaenene cessor eee CHAPTER XXII. BARKHAMSTED (Continued nescence CHAPTER XXIII. BaRKHAMSTED (Continued). CHAPTER XXIV. BARKHAMSTED (Continued) +--+ CHAPTER XXV. BETHLEHEM. Geographical—Topographical—The First Graut—The Indian Purchase —The Survey—The First Settlements—The Pioneers—Petitions for “Winter Privileges"—Incidents—Prices of Irovisions in 1747—Ec- clesiastical History—Congregational Church—Christ Church—Meth- odist Episcopal Church—Bethlehem Library Associations—Physicians —The “ Great Sickness” of 1760—Civil and Military History—Organi- zation of Towu—Ofticers Elected—Town Clerks—Selectmen from 1787 to 1881—Representatives from 1787 to 1881—Present (1881) Town Oti- cers—Military Record ane 251 CHAPTER XXVI. BripGEWATER. Geographical — Topographical — Incorporation of Town—First Town- Meeting—Officers Elected—List of Town Clerks—Representatives from 1857 to 1881 — Ecclesiastical History — Congregational Church—Sst. Mark’s Church— Methodist Episcopal Church — Baptist Church — Roman Catholic Church—Grand List, 1881—Military Record....... 255 CHAPTER XXVIII. CANAAN. Geographical—Topographical—The Housatonic Falls—Sale of the Town —First Meeting of Proprietors—Held at Wethersficld—Name of the Town—First Settlement of the Town—Names of Pioneers and Gran- tees—Early Births and Marriages—Ecclesiastical History—Congrega- tional Church, South Canaan—Congregational Church, Falls Village —Methodist Episcopal Church, Falls Village—The Iron Bank—The Falls Village Savings Bank.....ssssesssecccsssesssceessscnecessssececeessssserse 264 CHAPTER XXVIII. CANAAN (Continued). Incorporation of the Town—First Town-Meetings—Bounty on Rattle. snake Tails—Religious Service—The Ringing of Swine—Pounds— Church Service—Extracts from Town Records—Unwholesome Inhab- itants—Fire-Locks —Grist-Mill— New County—Petition for Bank — - Trouble with Proprietors—Inhabitants Admitted—Bounty on “ Squir- rels,” etc.— List of Representatives from 1757 to 1881— Military RGGOId .ccccssssass cccvsssassxceacess dee paneuanasbseselacescescoeu seen dtaravesanie 267 CHAPTER XXIX. CoLEBROOK. Geographical—Topographical—Towns Patented to Hartford and Wind- sor—The Controversy—Survey of the Town—Ministerial and School Lots—Initial Events—Incorporation of the Town—First Town-Meet- ing—High ways—Early Settlers and their Locations—The First Death —The First Birth—The Church Controversy—Ecclesiastical History— Congregational Church—Representatives from 1796 to 1882—Military Record........0005 deasUsaeate wots secrets a aleucdeaaeaatiees obvedsceeeee Sacee oy pceates 274 CHAPTER XXX. CoRNWALL. Geographical—Topographical—The Indians—‘ Tom Warrups”—Sale of the Town—Its Bounds—The First Meeting of Proprietors—Early Reg- ulations—The First Settlers and their Locations—Grand List of 1742 —Family Sketches—The Old Emmons Tavern—The Whipping-Post and Stocks............ auieunsusabepeseecissuniiicasvas sews aenwesseeei int « 287 CHAPTER XXXI. CornwALu (Continued). Congregational Church, Cornwall—Congregational Church, North Corn- wall—Cornwall and Sharon Baptist Church—Baptist Church, Cornwall Hollow—Baptist Church, East Cornwall—Methodist Episcopal Church, Cornwall Bridge—Educational—The Foreign Mission-School—Cream Hill Agricultural School—W. C. and Miss L. Rogers’ School—Noah R. and E. Burton Hart’s School—Young Ladies’ Institute—The Alger Institute—Physicians—Cemeteries—Organization of Town—Represen- tatives from 1761 to 1882—Soldiers of the Revolution—Soldiers of the Risbelliony, LSGIAOG: sai; sss-cesspunssesineaneaconaaensi ey aiawslied adie Siicsesigeineas ce 300 CHAPTER XXXII. GosHEN. Geographical—Topographical—The First Settlements—The Laying Out of the Town—New Bantam—Goshen—Troubles between the Town and the Colony—The Mob—Committee of Investigation— Settlement of the Controversy—The First Grant and Survey—The Surveyor—The College Farm—Division of the Town into Rights—First Proprietors’ Meeting—The First Birth—The First .Meeting-House—The Pioneer Minister—The Pioneer Taverns—Location of Early Settlers—Pioneer Merchants—The First Saw- and Grist-Mill, etc...cseescccee avewees seeree 322 CHAPTER XXXITITI. GosHEN (Continued) ...ccccccccscssesescsses ade sCaceeetaeiiesy agevaipidtnden +e 833 CHAPTER XXXIV. GosneN ( Continued).—EccLestastica, CiviL, AND Mixitary. The Congregational Church—The Episcopal Church—The Methodist Episcopal Church—Methodist Episcopal Church, North Goshen—The First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Extracts from Records—Rep- resentatives from 1700 to 1880—Military History—The Heroes of Three Wars—The French War—War of the Revolution—War of the Rebellion—Names of Soldiers—Interesting Statistics...........ccsss0 346 CHAPTER XXXV. Harwinton. Geographical — Topographical — Original Proprietors— The Pioneers— Early Schools—Votes—The Revolution—Names of Soldiers, etc. 374 CHAPTER XXXVL Harwinton (Continued). The Congregational Church—The Episcopal Church—Incorporation— First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Representatives from 1757 to ‘ 1882—Military...... Aerereeneeaaeseneeseeseeenseeseesecssanvesssessssssscsseresense BTQY: CONTENTS. vii CHAPTER XXXVII. Kent. Geographical—Topographical—The Indians—The Moravians—The Grant —First Proprietors’ Meeting—List of Proprietors—The First Settle- ments—Grand List, 1745—The First School—The Congregational Church—St. Andrew’s Church—St. Luke’s Lodge, No. 48, F. and A. M. —Civil History—Incorporation of Town—The First Town-Meeting— First Marriage, Births, etc.—Representatives from 1757 to 1881—Mili- tary Record...... 384 CHAPTER XXXVIIL Morris. Geographical — Topographical — Pioneer Settlement—Parish of South Farms Incorporated—History of Congregational Church—The Advent Society—James Morris and Morris Academy—Incorporation of the Town—First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Extracts from Societies’ Records—Representatives from 1860 to P882—Military Record..... 388 CHAPTER XXXIX. CHAPTER XL. New Mixrorp. Geographical—Topographical—Indian History—Documentary History— Original Indian Deed, etc.......s.sesseeees age Ssbig| fa bincbachosenbeey aaageiee 422 CHAPTER XLI. New Mivrorp (Continued). Early Explorations—Purchases—Indian Map of the Town—The Patent —The First Settlement—First Proprietors’ Meeting—List of Original Proprietors—Initial Events—The North Purchase—Names of Proprie- tors—Biographical Notes of Some of the First Settlers—Town Hill and Town Street. 426 CHAPTER XLII. New Mirorp (Continued). Home-Lots of Original Purchasers—Proprietors of Common Fields— Proprietors’ Meetings—Record of Highways... wae 438 CHAPTER XLIII. NEW MILFORD (Continwed).....ccssessseeeeeeees sdboteedswachscbetets seve 445 CHAPTER XLIV. New Mixrorp (Continued). Congregational Church, New Milford—Methodist Episcopal Church, New Milford—Methodist Episcopal Church, Gaylordsville—Baptist Church, Northville—Baptist Church, Gaylordsville—Jemima Wilkin- son, the Universal Friend—Quaker Society—Roman Catholic Church. 451 CHAPTER XLV. New Mirrorp (Continued). The Press—The New Milford Republican—The New Milford Journal— The Housatonic Ray—The New Milford Gazette—First National Bank —Savings Bank—Library—St. Peter's Lodge, No. 21, F.and A. M.— Ousatonic Chapter, No. 33, R. A. M.—Good Shepherds’ Lodge, No. 65, 1.0.0. F.—Fire Department—Adelphic Institute—Old Advertisements —The Tobacco Interest—Grand List, 1880—Incorporation of Town— Representatives from 1725 to 1881—Probate Judges from 1787 to 1881 —Military History. 455 CHAPTER XLVI. Norro.k. Geographical—Topographical—The Pioneers—Sale of the Town—First Proprietors’ Meeting—War of the Revolution—Names of Soldiers— Labor Regulations, 1778—Pioneer Mills—Schools—The First Post-Office —LEcclesiastical History—Congregational Church—Methodist Episcopal Church—Temperance Society—Civil History—Incorporation of the Town—List of Representatives from 1722 to 1881—List of Physicians —College Graduates—Military History—Names of Soldiers—Soldiers’ Monuinient ..cccosassiarsanssenionassnarer vine esinesseetecdateveben festirindastizivik 468 CHAPTER XLVII. Norra Canaan. Geographical—Topographical—Incorporation of the Town—The Revolu- tion—Incidents—The First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Select- men from 1859 to 1882—Clerks from 1859 to 1882—Probate Judges from 1847 to Present Time—Representatives from 1859 to 1882—Eccle- siastical History—Congregational Church—Christ Church—Methodist Episcopal Church—Connecticut Western News—Villages—Military Record 482 CHAPTER XLVIII. PLyMouTH, The First Settlements—The Old Lead-Mine—Petition for “ Liberty of Planting”—Petition for Winter Privileges—Charter of the Town—Or- ganization of the Society, etc....cossseeeee 486 CHAPTER XULUIX. PiymovureH (Continued). Congregational Church, Plymouth—Congregational Church, Terryville —St. Peter’s Church, Plymouth.........:scressssssssecsrsercsseneseeees ssreee 492 CHAPTER L. PLYMOUTH (Continwued).ecccccccesessersercsccessrcesssseseceeeeseees 500 CHAPTER LI. Roxpury. Organization—Topographical—The Indians—The First Exploration— The First Settlements—Initial Events—The War of the Revolution— Ethan Allen—Col. Seth Warner—Capt. Remember Baker—War of 1812—The Schools—Prominent Citizens—Physicians, etc.—Ecclesias- tical History—Congregational Church—Episcopal Church—The Bap- tist Church—The Methodist Church—Civil and Military—Organization of Town—List of Representatives from 1797 to 1881—Organization of Probate District—List of Judges—Military Record.....cccccsecesees 512 CHAPTER LII. SALISBURY. Geographical—Topographical—The Indiaus—The First Purchase of Lands—The First Grant—The First Settlements—EHarly Highways— The Pioneers—Early Schools—Iron Interests—Lawyers, Physicians —Prominent Citizens—Grand List, 1742—Market-Place—The First Post-office—Pioneer Mill—Indian Mounds—The Revolution—War of 1812—The Iron Interests. 518 CHAPTER LIII. ed) + Sauissury (Conti CHAPTER LIV. SauisBury (Continued). Congregational Church—St. John’s Church—Trinity Church, Lime Rock —Methodist Episcopal, Lakeville—Methodist Episcopal, Lime Rock— Catholic, Lakeville. 641 CHAPTER LV. Sauispury (Continued).—Crvit anp Miuirary. First Proprietors’ Meeting—Incorporation of the Town—The First Town- Meeting—Officers Elected—Documentary—Origin of the Name of Town —Representatives from 1757 to 1881—Military History.........s.0+ 547 CHAPTER LVI. SHARON. - Geographical—Topographical—Conflicting Claims to Territory—Survey of the Towu—Line Between New York and Connecticut Defined— Indian History—The First Settlement—Richard Sackett—Sale of the Town—List of Original Purchasers—Patent of the Town—The Settle- ment in Distress—The First Death—The First Birth—First Marriage —The Moravians—The Revolutionary War—Shay’s Rebellion—List of Early Settlers......... . ve 563 CHAPTER LVII. Snanon (Continued). Congregational Church, Sharon—Congregational Church, Ellsworth— Episcopal Church—Methodist Episcopal Church—Incorporation of the viii 3 Town—First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Representatives from 1755 to 1881—Members of the Governor’s Council—Senators—Judges of the County Court—Justices of the Peace—Town Clerks—Attorneys— Physicians—College Graduates—Military Record......... eivicueeuwteees 583 CHAPTER LVIII. THOMASTON. Geographical—Topographical—Thomaston in 1825—Seth Thomas—The Seth Thomas Clock Company—Ecclesiastical History—Civil History— Incorporation of the Town—First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected— Present Town Officers—Representatives....csscsssssecsssresseserseveeses . 599 CHAPTER LIX. TORRINGTON. Geographical—Topographical—Naming the Town—List of Proprietors— Grand List, 1733—Division of Lots—The First Settlers and their Lo- cations—Initial Events—First Deeds of Conveyance—The Indian Fort —The First School-house—Pioneer Taverns—War of the Revolution— Proceedings of the Town—Names of Officers and Soldiers—Taxes During the Revolution—The Whipping-post—A Prosecution for Pro- fanity—Slavery—Organization of County Anti-Slavery Society at Wol- cottville—The Convention Routed by a Mob—‘ Nigger Pew” in Tor- rington and Torringford Churches—Emancipation of Slaves in Tor- Tington—John BrowD........::scccesseacsesessecssare: seccnsnes can seconessneaenes 610 CHAPTER LX, TorRINGTON (Continued). Wolcottville—Its Inception—United Movements—The Village in 1819— In 1836—In 1881—Seneca Lodge, F. and A. M.—Wolcottville Savings Bank— Brooks Brothers’ Banking-Office — Physicians — Attorneys— Torringford—Holbrook’s Mills—Hart’s Hollow—Torrington Hollow— Wrightville—Burrville... CHAPTER LXI. TorRINGTON (Continued). Congregational Church, Torrington—Congregational Church, Torring- ford — Wolcottville Congregational Church — Methodist Mpiscopal Church, Wolcottville— Trinity Church, Wolcottville — St. Francis’ Church, Wolcottville—Baptist Church, Newfield—Methodist Episcopal CHUECH, NOWAHElG ssrcceuisassneeiessvsteenenssacgay sys veveeheiie dcectaicas vs sied sonaee 626 CHAPTER LXII. TorrinetTon (Continued). The Coe Brass Manufacturing Compapy—The Coe Furniture Company —The Union Manufacturing Company—The Turner & Seymour Manufacturing Company --The Excelsior Needle Company — The Hardware Company—C. H. Hotchkiss & Sons—The Alvord Manu- facturing Company—The Hardware Manufacturing Company—The Hendy Machine Company, Etc..........csesesecee: aaend cae vedeaverye: sbiassdes 634 CHAPTER LXIII. TorRINGTON (Continued). Incorporation of Town—Representatives from 1762.to Present Time— Military Record, 1861-65.........cssccsseeserssessesesscssarseeereesssesenes seeeee 637 CHAPTER LXIV. WARREN. Geographical—Topographical—The First Settlements—Names of Set- tlers—Early Marriages—Organization of Parish and Town—The First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Documentary History—Ecclesiasti- cal History—-Representatives from 1786 to 1881.........000..cceee awees 641 CHAPTER LXV. WASHINGTON. Geographical—Topographical—Judea and New Preston Societies—The First Settlements—Names of Pioneers—Organization of Judea Society —Kcclesiastical History—The Congregational Church, Washington— Congregational Church, New Preston—Congregational Church, New Preston Hill—St. John’s Church—St. Andrew’s Church—Rising Sun Lodge, No. 27, F. and A. M.—Physicians—Revolutionary Incident— Gunn’s Seminary—The Shepaug Railroad—Lake Weroamaug—Civil and Military History—Organization of the Town—The First Town- CONTENTS. Meeting—Officers Elected—Documentary History—List of Selectmen from 1786 to 1881—List of Representatives—Probate Judges—Military Record CHAPTER LXVI. WATERTOWN. Geographical—Topographical—The First Settlements—The Pioneers— Organization of the Parish of Westbury—Incidents—Reminiscences of Hon. F. J. Kingsbury—Physicians—Men of Prominence—Lawyers— War of 1812—Notes—Evergreen Cemetery—Mortality List—Agricul- tural—Summer Resort—Railroad—Reminiscences of Mrs. Rev. Fred- aeccceeeeseeee 660 ope peeeneedasene ceases seers coneee sn: erick HOlcomb.......c.sseee coeeeoe CHAPTER LXVII. Watertown (Continued). Congregational Church—Christ Church—Methodist Episcopal Church— Methodist Episcopal Church*in North Part of Town........ssse eres 670 CHAPTER LXVIII. Watertown (Continued). Incorporation of Town—First Town-Meeting—Officers Elected—Ex- tract: from Town Records—The Revolution—Division of the Town— Representatives from 1780 to 1881—Town Clerks—Probate Judges— Military Record, 1861-65..........secce0e- Bidvecesigueses ds sesoleReneecen yea tireines® 672 CHAPTER LXIX. Woopzoury. Introductory—Six Purchases from the Pootatucks—First, or Pomperaug Purchase—Kettletown Purchase—Fourth, or Nonnewaug Purchase— Fifth Purchase—Sixth, or Confirmatory Purchase—Reservation, or “ Purchase”—Indian “ Marks’”—A Buried Race. see 685 CHAPTER LXX. Woopzury (Continued). Church Dissensions in Stratford the Cause of the Settlement of Wood- bury—Action of the General Court in 1667, 1669, 1670—Pomperaug Granted, and Settlement Commenced in 1672—Fresh Arrivals Next Year—Pomperaug made a Town and called Woodbury in 1674—Sig- nification of the Name... CHAPTER LXXI Woopzury (Continued). King Philip’s War in 1675—Inhabitants of Woodbury go back to Strat- ford—Orders of the General Court—Rev, Mr. Walker’s Letter—Inhab- itants Return in 1677—The First Three Corn-Mills—Town First Rep- resented in the General Court in 1684—Patent Granted to the Town in 1686—General Court grants the North Purchase to the town in 1703—Same Purchased of the Indians in 1710.......0..cssseces cesses cesses 691 CHAPTER LXXII. Woopzury (Continued), Character of the First Settlers—Capt. John Minor—Capt. William Cur- tiss—Hon. Samuel Sherman—Hon. John Sherman—Lieut. Joseph Jud- son—Lieut. Israel Curtiss—Col. Joseph Minor—IIackaliah Preston— HON. William Preston sccsicis:seasnsssesncssnas suceiievssesessvevvdsssomvesseon + 693 CHAPTER LXXIIIL Woopzury (Continued), Home-Lots—Rey. Z. Walker’s House—Palisaded Houses—First School- House—Second, or Stoddard Parsonage—First Meeting-House—First Birth, Marriage, and Death—First Clothier—First Physician—First Blacksmith—First Divorce—Parson Stoddard Kills Two Indians— Wood Creek Expedition—Slavery. 695 CHAPTER LXXIV. Woopsury (Continued). Character of Rey. Zechariah Walker—Reyv. Anthony Stoddard Settled— Rey. Noah Benedict Settled—Half- Way Covenant Abolished, 1760— Rey. Samuel R, Andrew Settled—Remaining Pastors of the Church —Recapitulation — Strict Congregational Church — Rey. Grove L. CONTENTS. eo Brownell Settled—Rev. John Churchill Settled—W. L. R. Wychorf Settled—Episcopal Church—Methodist Church—Catholic Church. 697 CHAPTER LXXV. Woovsury (Continued). French and Indian Wars—War of the Revolution—War Convention at Litchfield in 1766—Town-Meetings in 1774—Roston Alarm—Commit- tee of Olservation— Capture of Ticonderoga and Crown Point by Woodbury Men—Woodbury the Birthplace of Col. Ethan Allen, Col. Seth Warner, and Capt. Remember Baker—Tories—Events of 1775— Events of 1776—Events of 1777—Events of 1778—Shadrach Osborn— Commissary Supplies—Events of 1779—Events of 1780—Volunteers till New York should be taken—Events of 1781 and 1782—Conclu- BIO as ssierscsveonied sada niasseiesesveianeccecoseees Whee Sddecnnvauda var eansaonceereteeey + 700 CHAPTER LXXVI. Woopsury (Continued). List of Public Officers in Ancient Woodbury—Representatives, 1684-1881 —List of Soldiers in Fort William Herity Alarm—List of Soldiers in the Revolutionary War—List of Soldiers in the War of 1812—Woodbury’s Roll of Honor—War of the Rebellion, 1861-65—Alphabetical List of BIOGRAPHICAL. PAGE Patridge Thatcher.. 14 Daniel Everitt.. 15 Tapping Reeve.. 15 John Allen......... 16 Barzillai Slosson.. 4 Et Samuel W. Southmayd. 18 Jno. C. Smith. 20 Nathaniel Smith.. 20 James Gould.... 21 Noah B., Benedict. 22 Jabez W. Huntington 23 Phineas Miner.... 23 Leman Church.... 24 Ansel Sterling 24 Stephen T. Hosmer 25 Jno. T. Peters 26 Asa Chapman 27 Willistny Bristollsscvsveecocsessyeesasieneeiescess vaysvegswisaceesteecQenmnsexeosecnses 27 Jeremiah G. Brainard.. 27 David Daggett.. 27 John Welch.. 27 Jabez Swift. 28 Adonijah Strong 28 JOS. Canfield.....secsceccccsee seers cceeeeseee ebat ab sseexserece 28 Martin Strong. 28 Asa Bacon..... 28 Elisha Sterling. 28 David 8, Boardman. 29 William G. Williams. John Strong, Jr... 29 Calvin Butler. - 29 Cyrus Swan..........0.ssecereesseoees eaviscei audedeaaty aseawees 29 Jos, Miller ee .. 80 William Ms Burrall .o.sssesccsccone sooesovesssessesuaensseesnssonatenesse end qdevewians 30 William Coggswell. 30 Seth P. Beers Perry Smith Roger Mills Michael F. Mills. 30 Charles B. Phelps 31 Matthew Minor..... 31 Nathaniel P. Perry..........0-0.00+- 31 Holbrook Curtis 31 William BE. Curtia.......cccccccceecereors wees 32 Isaac Leavenworth and R, R. Hinman 33 Joseph H. Bellamy. Theodore North William S. Holabird.. George S. Boardman. John Elmore... Samuel Church, Gideon Hall..... Truman Smith ee Charles F. Sedgwick ....-.sssossssesscseessessers George C. Woodruff. J. H. Hubbard | the Soldiers of Woodbury in the War of the Rebellion............... 705 PAGE , 0.8. Seymour... 36 Miles T. Granger.. 37 Henry B. Graves ir 38 William Cothren........cccecccssecesscceeeercees ree 38 George A. HickOX seis iwc sessise secscascsivevsseseessesscousesees coseet 40 Marcus A. Delavan 40 Jacob B. Hardenbergh.. 42 George Wheaton.. 43 F. D. Fyler....... 43 Augustus H. Fenn 44 A. P. Bradstreet... 44 Augustus Pettibone. 44 John B. Welch....... 51 L,. W. Wessells. 76 Julius Deming 155 Gideon H. Hollister... 156 Hiram Stone.. 156 J.P. Brace.. 157 John Catlin. 158 F. H. Catlin 159 Myron Osborn 159 Amos Bissell.. 160 The Bissell Family. 160. Eliada Kilbourn.. 161 Noah Guernsey.... 162 Guy Catlin....... 162 Henry W. Buel. 162} Payne R. Kilbourne 1624 Daniel Sheldon....... 1623 Samuel H. Dudley.. 163 Heman Beach Charles D. Wheeler... Levi Coe...... Jacob Morse .. 164 David M. Grant... 165 The Plumb Family. 165 Philip 8. Beebe. 166 George Dudley. 223 John Boyd.. 224. James Welch 224 Jno. W. Bidwell.. 225 Elliot Beardsley 225 William H. Phelps... 225 John G. Wetmore 226 W. L. Gilbert... 227 Elias E. Gilman. 228 John Hinsdale... wee 228 Harvey B. Steele.. «between 228, 229 Henry Gay...... me 228, 229 Lyman Baldwin... 229 David Strong.... : 230 Samuel W. Coe. -between 230, 231 Franklin Moore.. » 231 Charles Cook....... 232 Eugene Potter.. 232 J. H. Norton... x CONTENTS. PAGE William F. Hatch. 233 Timothy Hulber E. Manchester. Theron Bronson. Henry H. Drake. William Lawrence D. H. Stephens..... James Allen...... Glover Sanford Lyman Smith. James H. Keeler Henry Sanford... Marcus B. Mallett. Roswell Morris John Wooster.... U. H. Miner ‘ Aw CO, Randall. ii... cscs ce eeeeeceee: Whiting G. Kellogg. Charles Hunt.....cccccccsececssesscesesseecanere oe 271 Nathan Millard 272 Milo Holabird... 272 Jonathan Bates... 273 Pitkin Cowles.... 273 Edward A. Phelps. 284 Reuben Rockwell... 284 Timothy Persons John S. Wheeler Asaph 0. Pinney... Solomon Sackett Lucien 0. Bass Wm. P. Lawrence. Loren De Wolf. Luther Phelps. Harvey W. Pinney, Theodore S. Gold... 311 The Harrison Family. 313 John R. Harrison... 313 Myron Harrison 314 Frederick Kellogg . 315 Edwin White.. 315 Ezra D. Pratt.. 316 Isaac Marsh......... 317, The Noah Rogers Family. + 318 Sylvester H. Barnum...... between 320, 321 Charles N. Shepard............cessscsssssescrsseeeresesscceee 321 Henry Norton.......ss2000 354 Capt. William Gaylord 354 Moses Lyman... 355 Erastus Lyman The Waddam Family, Daniel N. Lucas Frederick A. Lucas... F. E. Hurlbut I eerceescseeiecmeoneonesimmiiesy Fessenden Ives.. Norman Norton.. William Norton... Charles L. Norton. Truman P. Clark... William L. Griswold Acors W. Lawton.. seeeansesseereereeeene OTE Burfus Fuller......cse cscs ssesse vonsssresevess soseseseceneeseeseeense eosees facing 386 Russell Stone . ee Seana ents 388 Dan Throop........ age eesrtetes lacing 390 Phineas W. Camp.... we 391 Lyman L. Griswold.. 391 ‘Abel C. Tracy.... 392 William H. Farnham . 392 John C, Smith... 419 Henry Jones...... « 419 The Goodwin Family. -between 420, 421 Charles F. Maxfield.........ssssssecssesscerceaseecesses scenes 421 Chester W. Gilman.......cccacccsssssccsssesccecconesensessccenssenseseess easeeseene 421 E. M. Chapin... 421 Ambrose 8. Rogers. 461 George Taylor ove 463 PAGE D. E. Sonle...... opdavaiseceersys 465 Albert N. Baldwin. 465 George S. Noble. 466 H. G. Sperry. 467 480 Joseph Eldridge. Austin A. Spaulding. K. T. Butler.........- William Bennett... James Terry.....-sseccreseee 504 Andrew Terry 506 Augustus C. Shelton. 507 Byron Tuttle..... 508 George Pierpont. 509 Lyman D. Baldwin 510 William B. Fenn... 511 Aaron P. Fenn... 511 Oliver Smith...... 512 Charles Beardsley......ssccsssssscsssccessreerecsenssen sss cs sneeeesneesecnsees ens eas 517 George Hurlbut..cc. cecccscecssee cosseereeeeenseensocesseessseneneanee seeeas facing 518 John M. Holley 550 A. H. Holley coe 551 The Moore Family. wee 553 Frederick Miles.... 554 Henry M. Knight... 554 Peter P. Everts 556 Newton J. Reed.. - 558 H. P. Harris.. 558 Daniel B. Cook a 559 Robert Little... 559 James M. Selleck... 560 Erastus D. Goodwin 560 James Landon. 560 Charles H. Bissell.. 562 John F. Cleaveland 562 Thomas N. Smith... 562 Johu C. Jackson.. 590 John 8. Jewett. Ralph Deming. Gamaliel H. St. John The Peck Family Lemuel Peck...........scecseeoe Charles M. Parsons .. ae F. L. Pierson..... 0 594 Samuel Skiff, Jr. 595 Gibbs W. Skiff... 595 Seth B. St. John 596 Henry St. John ~ 596 Samuel Dean. Asa Everitt... Ichabod 8S. Everitt. 598 Augustus Everitt...... 598 Benjamin 8. Reed. 599 Seth Thomas. 602 Seth Thomas, Jr.. 603 Edward Thomas.. 603 Aaron Thomas.. 603 Thomas J. Bradstreet 603 William Woodruft..... 605 George W. Gilbert.. 606 Marcus Prince.... 606 Randal T. Andrews 607 Benjamin Platt... 607 George B. Pierpont 608 Miles Morse........... 608 Israel B. Woodward.. 608 F. E. Warner......... ieancnseecesennageunsesrees aay -between 608, 609 Henry F, Reynolds....sscssccsccssessesssessscessevesenceacsensscecses 609 William P. Judson 609 Hiram Pierce.. 610 Milo Burr........ 640 Jesse B. Rose... 640 F. P. Hills... 641 Orson Barber 641 William Hopkins 650 Daniel N. Bri d 656 Daniel B. Brinsmade.... Stanley E. Beardsley. CONTENTS. xi PAGE PAGE F, W. Guan... Caleb T. Hickox.... Henry Upson | William G. French 683 Gregory Seeley. Frederick J. Partree. 684. Samuel J. Averill The Curtiss Family "17 Leman W. Cutler.. Daniel Curtiss. 718 Merrit Heminway. 675 John De Forest...ccccsess-sssssreecccenssessaecessenssererceesescesceentseneceeseoees 676 Samuel Elton A.M. Hungerford. Benjamin De Forest. E. B. Dickerman Alanson War;ren..ssece Frederick Hol b E. C. Bower 678 679 Thomas Bull............ Benjamin Fabrique . ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE Outline Map of County facing 13 Portrait of James Gould..... ee 22 ee Ansel Sterling... ey 24 cs Michael F. Mills. eg 30 ef Holbrook Curtis. ne 31 « William E. Curtis. accesses“ 32 te Charles F. Sedgwick... se 35 ey 0. S. Seymour........ es 36 ee George C. Woodruff. ++ between 36, 37 ae John H. Hubbard... “36, 37 ad M. T. Granger. .facing 38 s W. Cothren. se 39 s George Wheaton.. s 43 « Augustus Pettibone. between 44, 45 4s Albert P. Bradstreet... eroane «=F 44, 45 a John Sedgwick. 50 as John B. Welch. 52 “ L. W. Wessells.. 76 LITCHFIELD. Portrait of Moses Seymour... a Julius Deming. & 155 . Hiram Stone. s 156 f J.P. Brace. ee 157 i John Catlin “ 158 sf F. H. Catlin “ 159 # Myron Osborn... ..between 160, 161 me Amos Bissell... pee is 160, 161 Be Henry B. Bissell., » © 160, 161 * Eliada Kilbourn.. ae 160, 161 e Noah Guernsey.... asooseefacing 162 e Guy Catlin.......... -between 162, 16244 « H. W. Buel facing 16214 a Dan. Sheldon......cccccccsssseesstscecerserecceesessse erence ce 16214 zs 8. H. Dudley...... «between 162, 163 os Heman Beach.. “162, 163 “ Charles D. Wheeler.. «162, 163 Residence of Charles D. Wheeler (two views)... « 162, 163 f Levi C00 ....esssssesseerercesseesseereee “ 162, 163 Portrait of Levi Coe « (164, 165 . Jacob Morse... fs 164, 165 - David M. Grant. “164, 165 ee Seth PF. PIUMD........cccocsernceascsseeseceee seseessesereseees facing 165 f William Beebe.. . between 166, 167 a Philip 8, Beebe : » © 166,167 WINCHESTER. Residence of George W. Phelps...cseccsscocrresrsessenescceeesssereeftacing 220 Portrait of George Dudley....... Jno. Boyd... % W. 4H. Phelps... a James Welch... J. W. Bidwell... J. G. Wetmore. Horace Hurd, 720 George B. Lewis... sete secceresesenassercees 721 Harmon W. Shove...... 721 Joseph Battell 723 The Coe Family 124 Rufus Babcock 725 PAGE Residence of J. G. Wetmore... between 226, 227 Portrait of William L. Gilbert.. wfacing 227 “Elias E. Gilman. my 228 see Harvey B. Steele.. between 228, 229 « Henry Gay.......... ee 228, 229 “ John Hinsdale...... a s 228, 229 * Lyman Baldwin... facing 229 « David Strong.... a) oe 230 “ Samuel W. Coe. between 230, 231 ee Franklin MOoore........ccssssscccesssseesscsacsecssesescseees facing 231 us Charles Cook 232 “ J. H. Norton... facing 232 as Eugene Potter.. ebetween 232, 233 a W.F. Hatch...... a 232, 233 oe Timothy Hulbert.........-s:ccccscessrersescsssssecsereseesn facing 233 es E. Manchester...... 234 Resid of E. Manchest «facing 234 Portrait of Theron Bronson..... s 235 ee William Lawrence.. Be 236 Resid of L. S. Nash “« 237 : BARKHAMSTED. Portrait of D. H. Stephens...... dedeassaa termites wetCINg “241 BETHLEHEM. Resid of James Allen between 252, 253 Portrait of James Allen......ccsssscseesarssecssessersreesseceerrreeetacing 255 BRIDGEWATER. Portrait of Glover Sanford.........ssssersseessusseereree «between 258, 259 re Lyman Smith a MS 258, 259 ee James H. Keeler. 1 senses 260 “ Marcus B. Mallett... facing 261 ce Henry Sanford.....eccccsssessceccscnscesssnvsscerscecssnerensenseneese 261 % Roswell Morris.. facing 262 “ John Wooster... 263 CANAAN, Portrait of Joel Miner... facing 269 ss U. H. Miner.. -between 270, 271 se A. C. Randall......... widinesiisidatisncccimcioccstents: S -270, i201, of W. G. Kellogg. facing 271 ce Charles Hunt... " 272 “ W. W. Millard. -between 272, 273 se Jonathan Bates. “272, 273 a Milo Holabird... i Ganabeoswaestsevessses facing 273 COLEBROOK. Residence of E. A. Phelps.. «facing 282 Portrait of E. A. Phelps.. e 284 s Timothy Persons. -between 284, 285 st John S, Wheeler.. oe ss 284, 285 s Reuben Rockwell.. ae 284, 285 “ A. 0. Pinney......... sites: Soe 284, 285 Solomon Sackett.......sse+0 . 286 Xil PAGE Portrait of William P. Lawrence. .-facing 286 af L. O. Bass... Residence of L. 0. Bass. “286, 287 Portrait of Loren DeWolf. s 286, 287 s Luther Phelps... a a ae 286, 287 Residence of Harvey W. Pinney....ccceccceserssccersecereecenee certs facing 287 CORNWALL. Portrait of T.S. Gold.......scesee e George C. Harrison Residence of George C. Harrison.. Portrait of John R. Harrison. s Myron Harrison fea Fes 312 «between 312, 313 facing 313 cs Frederick Kellogg 315 ce Edwin White.. 316 ee E. D. Pratt.. . 316 af Isaac Marsh facing 317 ve Dwight Rogers.. mess “8 320 ee Sylvester H. Barnum.. «between 320, 321 ae Charles N. Shepard........ssccccsscesseserersccossscnseeoses facing 321 GOSHEN. Portrait of Henry Nortou.... facing 354 se William Gaylord « between 354, 355 s Moses Lyman.... » © — 354, 355 Residence of Moses Ly matue...cccsssssseseccseseecesseesereesneesereee facing 355 Portrait of Erastus Lyman... co, SY 357 £8 John M. Wadhams Gi 363 fs Daniel N. Lucas..... s 365 fa Frederick A. Lucas er 367 ie F. E, Hurlbut. seg SE 370 ee Henry G. Wright. -between 370, 371 5 Fessenden Ives... ce 370, 371 Residence of Fessenden Ives. re 370, 371 Portrait of Norman Norton.s......cccscsscessoececceeescesssesesseeseeeee facing 371 a William Norton. -between 372, 373 Charles L. Norton.. e 4S “8780878 a Truman P,, Clarkinasss Assesses sisarracenavrsverisseavenay facing 373 a William L. Griswold. ee Acors W. Lawton..... - between 374, 375 wee TE, BT5 KENT. Portrait of Rufus Fuller... sé Russell Stone... r MORRIS. Portrait of Dan Throop..... - facing 390 si P. W. Camp.. -between 390, 391 & Lyman L. Griswold... sig 390, 391 ae William H. Farnham... wee = 8392, 893 es Abel C. Tracy ae “© 392, 393 NEW HARTFORD. Portrait of John C. Smith....... gad pages siug seassagpoeneinensean’ between 418, 419 #6 Henry Jones.. " 418, 419 he BE. M. Chapin see facing 420 ---between 420, 421 “420, 421 “490, 491 wowefacing 421 s Charles F. Maxfield Residence of Charles F. Maxfield.. Portrait of C. W. Gilman........ccccsecsereeseees NEW MILFORD. Portrait of Ambrose 8. Rogers....... between 460, 461 Residence of Ambrose S. Rogers. “ 460, 461 Views of A. S. Rogers’ grounds “ 462, 463 Portrait of George Taylor facing 463 Residence of D. E. Soule. “ 464 Portrait of D. E. Soule... 465 e Albert N. Baldwin. wfacing 465 cd George H. Noble. a“ 466 sf H. G. Sperry....... “ 467 NORFOLK. Portrait of Joseph Battell..... He Joseph Eldridg: ee QB. T. Butler........ wfacing 478 ava Gt 480 Witocs ve between 480, 481 CONTENTS. PAGE Residence of E. T. Butler.......... aabea serena a sesanssnsecaseanee ree between 480, 481 ee Austin A. Spaulding.. «facing 481 Portrait of Austin A. Spaulding, NORTH CANAAN. Portrait of William Bennett........sssccssenccesseeeeessssee revere nene facing 486 PLYMOUTH. Portrait of James Terry. «facing 504 te Andrew Terry. se A. C. Shelton.. ee Byron Tuttle.. ne George Pierpont. st L. D. Baldwin ss William B. Fenn.. ss Aaron P. Fenn.. facing 511 fe Oliver Smith....ccccscessssessseeeee oe fe 512 ROXBURY. Residence of Charles R. Hurd. between 514, 515 Portrait of Charles Beardsley.........ssseccsessssseesesennseesesscenseanseeceene . 517 a George Hurlbut.... SALISBURY. Portrait-Of Milo: BarnuMlesesssasstevssesesaacessaneevervsssrsessveecwessie’ facing 530 ss Leonard Richardson... es 532 Residence of A. H. Holley...... between 534, 535 se Mrs. M. H. Williams. ne 534, 535 Portrait of John M. Holley........ «facing 550 ee Alexander H. Holley " Silas B. Moore. ne Albert Moore... e Frederick Miles.. sf H.M. Knight. a Peter P. Everts - Newton J. Reed... os H. P. Harris....... “ Daniel B. Cook... wee 558 . between 558, 559 “558, 559 facing 559 Albert Selleck etaiasate | 560 «between 560, 561 «860, 561 s Erastus D. Goodwin.. ef James Landon.... facing 561 te Charles H. Bissell.. ~ © 562 “e John F, Cleaveland... -between 562, 563 fe Thomas N. Smith..... “562, 563 SHARON. Residence of John C. Jackson facing 588 Portrait of John ©. Jacksou......s.ccccssccccesssseesseccesscecessteseuece es 590 Residence of 8. B. Jewett..... -between 590, 591 Portrait of John S, Jewett. ae) O88 590, 591 ie Ralph Deming..........cccccsccsssssscsssssssscecssesscecs facing 591 se Gamaliel H. St. John... .ccccccccscesecceceseseseeece fs 592 a Enoch P. Peck.. se Augustus L. Peck sf EB. R. Peck....... fe Charles W. Peck -between 592, 593 - © — §92, 593 se 592, 593 ee Lemuel Peck. ven #E 594 i Charles M. Parsons. -between 594, 595 ee Gibbs W. Skiff..... 7 se Samuel Skiff....... Frederick L. Pierson.. Residence of Ichabod S. Everitt .. + Henry St. John. Portrait of Seth B. St. John . s Henry St. John. Samuel Dean... s Ichabod §. Everitt. s Asa Everitt......... Augustus Dyeritt... sf Benjamin 8. Reod.. -between 596, 597 “696, 597 597 facing 598 between 598, 599 “ 598, 599 «facing 699 THOMASTON. Portrait of Seth Thomas........cccceces hii Seth Thomas, Jr.. “ Aaron Thomas... -between 602, 603 “ 602, 603 “ 602, 603 CONTENTS. PAGE Portrait of Edward Thomas - between 602, 603 et Thomas J. Bradstreet.....ccccccsescsssns cosceerseessetees facing 603 as William Woodruff.. saver 88 605 “ G. W. Gilbert. .between 606, 607 ce Randal T. Andrews. Boe HEE 606, 607 ug Marcus Prince He 606, 607 He Benjamin Platt... i HE 606, 607 ie George B. Pierpont. se 608, 609 & Miles Morse... << 608, 609 ct Israel B. Woodward a 608, 609 g Henry F. Reynolds. es 608, 609 « F. E. Warner...... ss 608, 609 € William P. Judson.. «facing 609 TORRINGTON. View of John Brown’s birthplace................ pscussadeecagnes re 620 Residence of John M. Burr... -between 638, 639 Portrait of Milo Burr........... we facing 640 ee Jesse B. Rose...... ...between 640, 641 ef Frederick P. Hills cabs, OSE 640, 641 " O. Barber... .ssessecceess igs veld saddles esses spe searae ss os 640, 641 WARREN. Residence of H. H. Morehouse Portrait of William Hopkins.... Residence of George C. Hopkins.... caw WASHINGTON. Portrait of Daniel N. Brinsmade. ai, 650 «between 650, 651 «between 656, 657 Daniel B. Brinsmade. se 656, 657 a6 F. W. Gunn... ss 656, 657 e Henry Upson. « 656, 657 Upson Seminary facing 657 Portrait of Gregory Seeley.... “ Samuel J. Averill. oa 659 WATERTOWN. Residence of Buell Heminway.....scsseccssessseseeseeseeseesaveneeae facing 670 ss the late Eli Curtiss. . 672 Portrait of Leman W. Cutler. Portrait of John Curtiss..... between 674, 675 eS 674, 675 “676, 677 “ 676, 677 «facing 677 Merrit Heminway.. John De Forest. Samuel Elton.... A. M. Hungerford.. Eli Curtiss........ ee 678 Benjamin De Forest between 678, 679 E. B. Dickerman. sea ME 678, 679 A. Warren i Frederick Holcomb. - © 68L # 682 Caleb T. Hickox between 682, 683 Dayton Mattoon = 682, 683 Wn. G. French...... «facing 683 F. J. Partree.. a HA 684 WOODBURY. Henry 8S. Curtiss Daniel Curtiss Stanley E. Beardsley.. se 719 Thomas Bull.. between 720, 721 Benjamin Fabrique.. 720, 721 Horace Hurd.. i 720, 721 H., W. Shove... “720,721 George B. Lewis .... cies, 720, 721 MASS A CH US ETTS5 F oO S TATE HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE. Geographical—Topographical—Organization of Litchfield County—Lo- cation of County-Seat—Conflicting Claims—First County Officials— County Buildings—List of Sheriffs, Treasurers, Clerks, and State’s At- torneys from 1751 to 1882—Chief Judges Court of Common Pleas from 1751 to 1854. GEOGRAPHICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE. LITCHFIELD CounTyY lies in the extreme north- western portion of the State of Connecticut, and is bounded as follows: On the north by Massachusetts, on the east by Hartford and New Haven Counties, on the south by New Haven and Fairfield Counties, and on the west by the counties of Dutchess and Co- lumbia, in New York. It comprises about eight hun- dred and eighty-five square miles of territory, and is the largest county in area in the State. The physical features of Litchfield County present a bold outline of irregular hills and deep valleys. The county is watered by the Housatonic, Nauga- tuck, Shepaug, and Farmington Rivers, and numer- ous smaller streams. The Naugatuck and Shepaug are tributaries of the Housatonic, which flows into Long Island Sound, while the Farmington empties into the Connecticut River a few miles above Hart- ford. The soil is generally a gravelly loam, in many portions strong and fertile, and well adapted to graz- ing. The manufacture of iron is carried on in this county—principally in the town of Salisbury—more extensively than in any other section of the State. ORGANIZATION OF THE COUNTY. Litchfield County was organized in the year 1751, and at that time consisted of the following towns: Canaan, Cornwall, Goshen, Harwinton, Kent, New Hartford, New Milford, Salisbury, Sharon, Torring- ton, and Woodbury,—eleven in number. As the pop- ulation increased new towns were formed, and at the present time the county consists of twenty-six civil subdivisions. The following is a list, with dates of incorporation: Barkhamsted, 1779; Bethlehem, 1787; Bridgewater, 1856; Canaan, 1789; Colebrook, 1779; Cornwall, 1740; Goshen, 1749; Harwinton, 2 1787; Kent, 1739; Litchfield, 1724; Morris, 1859; New Hartford, 1733, about ; New Milford, 1725, prob- ably; North Canaan, 1858 ; Norfolk, 1758; Plymouth, 1795; Roxbury, 1801; Salisbury, 1745; Sharon, 1739; Thomaston, 1875; Torrington, 1732; Warren, 1786; Washington, 1779; Watertown, 1780; Winchester, 1771; Woodbury, 1674.* When the movement started for the organization of the county much diversity of opinion existed re- garding the location of the county-seat. Cornwall and Canaan made their claims and had their advo- cates, but the chief contest was between Litchfield and Goshen. The latter town was supposed to occupy the geographical centre, and many persons had settled there in expectation that that would become the fixed seat of justice, and, among others, Oliver Wolcott, afterwards Governor of the State. But at the October session of the General Court, in 1751, Litchfield County was organized with Litchfield as the county-seat. THE FIRST COUNTY OFFICERS. The following were appointed by the General Court first officers of the county: Chief Justice, William Preston, of Woodbury; Associate Justices, John Wil- liams, of Sharon; Samuel Canfield, of New Milford ; and Ebenezer Marsh, of Litchfield; Clerk, Isaac Baldwin; Sheriff, Oliver Wolcott. Mr. Kilbourne in his history says,— “Even after this county was thus formed and its officers appointed the town of Woodbury continued to manifest her dissatisfaction in various ways and at all reasonable times, Instead of being made the central and shire town of the new county, she was left quite in one corner. She first petitioned the Legislature (in May and again in October, 1752) to be re- annexed to the county of Fairfield. Twenty years later an effort was again made to persuade the General Assembly to organize a county to be called Woodbury. On this occasion the town of Woodbury laid a rate of a penny and a half on the pound, in addition to the regular tax, to be applied towards erecting the county buildings; and, further, she generously offered the use of her Town-Hall for a Court-House. “Mr. Cothren informs us that in May, 1748, the inhabitants of Wood- bury appointed Col. William Preston an agent to prefer a memorial to the General Assembly for the organization of a new county to be called the county of Woodbury, to embrace the towns of Woodbury, Waterbury, New Milford, Litchfield, aud New Fairfield, and as many of the northern towns as might choose to join them, with Woodbury for the county-seat. The result need not he told.” * Hartland, Hartford Co., originally belonged to this county. 13 14 The County Court at its first session in December of thesame year appointed Samuel Pettibone, of Goshen, to be King’s attorney, who was within a few years succeeded by Reynold Marvin, of Litchfield, and these two gentlemen were the only ones in this county in this capacity who ever represented the King’s majesty in that administration of criminal justice. COUNTY BUILDINGS. The first jail erected was a small wooden building, on the north side of East Street. This stood but a few years, and in its place a more commodious one was built, nearly on the same foundation. The present jail was built in 1812, and has been subsequently im- proved. The first court-house stood on the open grounds a little casterly from the West Park. It was a small building, but in it were often witnessed some of the most able efforts of American eloquence. In this humble temple of justice Hon. 8. W. Johnston, of Stratford, Edwards, of New Haven, Reeve, Tracy, Allen, and the Smiths, of this county, exhibited some of the best essays of forensic power. The present court-house was erected in 1798. CHIEF JUDGES COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.* William Preston, Woodbury, 1751-54; John Williams, Sharon, 1754-73 ; Oliver Wolcott, Litchfield, 1773-86; Daniel Sherman, Woodbury, 1786-91; Joshua Porter, Salisbury, 1791-1808; Aaron Austin, New Hartford, 1808-16; Augustus Pettibone, Norfolk, 1816-30; David S. Boardman, New Milford, 1831-36; William M. Burrall, Canaan, 1836-38 ; Ansel Sterling, Sharon, 1838-39; Calvin Butler, Plymouth, 1839-40; Ansel Sterling, Sharon, 1840-42; William M. Burrall, Ca- naan, 1842-44; ALijah Catlin, Harwinton, 1844-46; Elisha 8. Aber- nethy, Litchfield, 1846-47; Holbrook Curtis, Watertown, 1847-49; Hiram Goodwin, Barkhamsted, 1849-50; Charles B. Phelps, Wood- bury, 1850-51; Hiram Goodwin, Barkhamsted, 1851-52; Charles B. Phelps, Woodbury, 1852-54; Hiram Goodwin, Barkhamsted, 1854. SHERIFFS FROM 1751-1882. Oliver Wolcott, 1751-72 ; Lynde Lord, 1772-1801; John R. Landon, 1801- 19; Moses Seymour, Jr., 1819-25; Ozias Seymour, 1825-34; Albert Sedgwick, 1834-35; Charles A. Judson, 1835-38; Albert Sedgwick, 1838-54; Leverett W. Wessels, 1854-66; H. W. Botsford, 1866-70 ; George If. Baldwin, 1870-78; John D. Yale, 1878-81; Charles J. Porter, 1881. TREASURERS FROM 1751-1882. Jolin Catlin, 1751-61; Elisha Sheldon, 1761-79; Reuben Smith, 1779- 1801; Julins Deming, 1801-14; Abel Catlin, 1814-42; Charles R. Webb, 1842-64; G, A. Hickox, 1864-76; William (. Buell, 1876-81. COUNTY CLERKS, 1751-1882. Isaac Baldwin, 1751-93 ; Frederick Wolcott, 1793-1836; Origen S. Seymonr, 1836-44; Gideon H. Hollister, 1844-46; Origen S. Seymour, 1846-47 ; Gideon II, Hollister, 1847-50; Elisha Johnson, 1850-51; Frederick D. Beeman, 1851-61; W. L. Ransom, 1861-81. STATE'S ATTORNEYS. King’s Atlorneys.—Saumnel Pettibone, Goshen; Reynold Marvin, Andrew Adams, Litchfield. State's Attorneys—Andrew Adams, Tapping Reeve, Litchfield ; Jolin Can- field, Sharon; Jobn Allen, Uriah Tracy, Daniel W. Lewis, Uriel Holmes, Jr., Litchfield; Elisha Sterling, Salisbury; Seth P, Beers, Litchfield; Samuel Church, Salisbury (and Litchfield); Leman Church, Canaan; David C. Sanford, New Milford (and Litchfield) ; John H, Hubbard, Salisbury (and Litchfield) ; Julius B. Harrison, New Milford; Gideon Hall, Winchester; Charles F, Sedgwick, Sharon ; James Huntington, present incumbent. J. Whitney, Canaan; ei | * Court abolished in 1835, HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. CHAPTER II. BENCH AND BAR+ Amone the prominent agencies which give shape and order in the early development of the civil and social condition of society, the pulpit, press, and bar are perhaps the most potential in moulding the insti- tutions of a new community; and where these are early planted, the school, academy, and college are not long in assuming their legitimate position, and the maintenance of these institutions secures at the start a social and moral foundation upon which we may safely rest the superstructure of the county, the State, and the nation. The establishment of court and judicial tribunals, where society is protected in all its civil rights under the sanction of law, and wrong finds a ready re- dress in an enlightened and prompt administration of justice, is the first necessity of every civilized com- munity, and without which the forces of society in their changeable developments, even under the teach- ings of the pulpit, the direction of the press, and the culture of the schools, are exposed to peril and disaster from the turbulence of passion and conflicts of in- terest; and hence the best and surest security that even the press, the school, or the pulpit can find for the peaceful performance of its highest functions is when protected by and intrenched behind the bul- warks of the law, administered by a pure, independent, and uncorrupted judiciary. The Litchfield County bar has from its beginning numbered among its members able jurists, talented advocates, and safe counselors. Here many have lived, flourished, and died, while others still are upon the stage of action who have been prominent in the ad- vancement. of the interests of the county and figured conspicuously in the councils of the State. “PATRIDGE THATCHER was the first man who practiced the legal profession in New Milford. He was not educated to the profession, but took up the trade because there were none of the craft hereabout when this county was organized, which was after he came to middle age. He was a native, I have been told, of Lebanon, in this State, and came to New Mil- ford I know not how long ago. He was, however, a married man at the time. He had no children, but a large number of negroes, whom he treated with kindness enough to put to shame the reproaches of all the abolitionists in New England. He was a man of strong mind, of rigid morality, and religious to the letter according to the strictest sect of orthodox Epis- copacy. He adored Charles I. as a martyr, and he hated Oliver Cromwell worse than he did the evil one. Loyalty, unconditional loyalty, was the prime element of his political creed. Of course, his name } This chapter embraces the reminiscences of the late David 8. Board- man, of New Milford; the remainder, except sketches of living lawyers, being furnished chiefly by Gen. Charles F. Sedgwick, of Sharon, to whom We are under special obligations. BENCH AND BAR. was not found in any list of the wicked Whigs of the Revolution, and had he lived in these days he would most thoroughly have eschewed Democracy and Ab- olitionism. On the breaking out of the Revolution- ary war his loyalty necessarily silenced his voice in court, and he died soon after its conclusion. Lawyer Thatcher, as he was always called, was undoubtedly a very odd, a very honest, and a very good man. “DANIEL EVERITT was a native of Bethlehem, and settled in New Milford as a lawyer some time during the early part of the Revolutionary war, probably as early as 1776 or 1777, possibly earlier, as from a record I have access to I see he was married to a daughter of the Rev. Nathaniel Taylor on the Ist of January, 1778, and I remember that he lived here some time before that event. He had not a collegiate education, but was a man of good education and received an honorary degree. He read law with Judge Adams, of Litchfield, and I remember to have heard him say that he occasionally officiated in Mr. Adams’ place as State’s attorney when he (Adams) was absent in Congress, which he often was during the war of the Revolution. Mr. Everitt was a man of much wit, boundless ex- travagance of expression, quick conception, and in command of language and fluency of utterance unsur- ‘passed, but not a man of much depth of mind, nor had he much legal learning, his library extending little beyond Blackstone and Jacobs’ Law Diction- ary. “He had, I believe, a very good run of practice, when the court read/y opened to do civil business after the conclusion of the war. His success in this respect was, however, of rather short duration, a number of younger lawyers having about that time commenced practice here, and other circumstances conspired to carry business away from him, and he never recovered it. While studying law I heard him argue a case or two, keeping the court-house in a roar by his wit and sarcasm, but by the time I was admitted—viz., in 1795 —he had about given up attending courts at Litchfield, though he was not fifty years of age, and indeed he was, I think, but fifty-seven when he died, in 1805. I met him, however, a few times before arbitrators and justices, and had enough to do to parry his home- thrusts of good-natured wit. Before him I often went, as he tried almost all the justice cases, which he always did with entire integrity and usually came to a correct conclusion. He represented this town, I think, three times in the General Assembly, and as a member of the convention which ratified the Con- stitution of the United States. He was a man of strict honesty, entire moral rectitude of conduct, and a professor of religion. He was, however, much given to sociality, and to that conviviality which sometimes borders on a kindred indulgence. Mr. Everitt suc- ceeded the late Col. Samuel Canfield as judge of probate in this district in 1790, and held that office till his death, at the time above mentioned. 15 “TAPPING REEVE.*—I saw much of Judge Reeve’s practice at the bar for nearly five years, during which time he was engaged in almost every case of import- ance tried in the Superior Court at Litchfield, and never failed to argue every one in which he was en- gaged, if argued at all. In the County Court, after I became acquainted with him, he did not practice. His school had become numerous, and he gave up his practice in that court because (I suppose) it too much interrupted his course of daily lectures, and knowing as he did that he should have a part in every cause expected to be tried in the Superior Court. And, by the way, trials were then managed and got through with in a reasonable time, and not suffered to be dragged out to the abominable and shameful length which they now are, to the disgrace of the profession for indulging in it, and of the courts for permitting it. “T joined Judge Reeve’s school in the fall of 1793, and he was not placed on the bench till the spring of 1796; so that I saw him at the bar during nine ses- sions of the Superior Court, and never failed to listen to him, if I could avoid it, with unqualified love and admiration through every speech he made to its con- clusion. I say with love, for no instructor was ever more generally beloved by his pupils, and indeed en- tirely so, except it was by those whose love would have been a reproach to the object of it. As a rea- soner he had no superior within the compass of my observation of forensic performances. J mean true, forcible, and honest reasoning. In sophistry he was too honest to indulge, and too discerning to suffer it to escape detection in the argument of an adversary. “ As a speaker he was usually exceedingly ardent, and the ardor he displayed appeared to be prompted by a conviction of the justice of the cause he was ad- vocating. His ideas seemed often, and, indeed, usu- ally, to flow in upon him faster than he could give utterance to them, and sometimes seemed to force him to leave a sentence unfinished to begin another, and in his huddle of ideas, if I may so express it, he was careless of grammatical accuracy, and, though a thor- ough scholar, often made bad grammar in public speaking. Careless as he was of his diction, and thoughtless as he was of ornament in ordinary cases, yet some elegant expressions and fine sentences would seem, as if by accident, to escape him in almost every speech. But in.such cases as afforded the proper field for the display of eloquence, such as actions of slander, malicious prosecutions, etc., and in that part of such cases as usually prompt to exertions of the kind, his hurried enunciation and grammatical inaccuracies all forsook him, and then he never failed to electrify and astonish his audience. Many of these used to be recited to me by those who had often heard him, and it fell to my lot to witness one such occasion, In an action for malicious prosecution, in closing the argu- ment on entering upon the subject of damages, he * See history of Litchfield, elsewhere in this work. 16 burst forth into such a strain of dignified and soul- thrilling eloquence as neither before nor since has ever met my ear. The first sentence he uttered thrilled through every nerve of my entire frame to the very ends of my fingers, and every succeeding sentence seemed to increase in overwhelming effect. I was perfectly entranced during its delivery, and for an hour afterwards I trembled so that I could not speak plain. His manner was as much changed as his lan- guage, and to me he looked a foot taller than before. The next day I went to him and asked him to commit to writing the concluding part of his speech, to which request he said in the simplicity of his nature, ‘Why, if I should do that, perhaps I should make it better than it really was, and that would not be fair.’ We told him (Mr. Bacon was with me) there was no danger of that, for we knew it could not be bettered. Well, he said, he would try, but he did not know whether he could recall it to memory, for there was not a word of it written beforehand. A day or two after he saw me in court, behind his seat, and beck- oned me to him and said he had tried to comply with my request, but it was so gone from him that he could make nothing of it. “T believe I have said enough in regard to Judge Reeve as an advocate, and that is the extent of your inquiry. As a judge you are acquainted with his rep- utation historically, though you probably never saw him on the bench, as he left it in May, 1816, to the regret of all admirers of legal learning and lovers of impartial justice. “JouN ALLEN was born in Great Barrington, Mass., some time, I believe, in 1762, of respectable parents, though not distinguished in society, as I re- member to have heard him say that he was the son of a joiner. There were but two children in the family, a son and a daughter, both much distinguished in life for many good qualities, and especially for dig- nity of manner and deportment, but the winning and amiable accomplishments all fell to the lot of the fe- male, gaining her many admirers, and among others a husband worthy of her in that excellent man, Elizur Goodrich, of New Haven. Their father died during the minority of both the children. Mr. Allen, having an excellent common-school education, though not a classic education, became a teacher, and, being im- pelled by a spirit of adventure, somewhat romantic as he was thought in those days, went suddenly, and without the knowledge of his friends, and while yet a minor, to Germantown, near Philadelphia, where he obtained a place as instructor of the younger classes of an academic establishment of some note at the time. How long he remained in the aboye-men- tioned establishment I do not know, but soon after leaving that place, and I believe almost immediately, he came to New Milford, and taught a school for some six months, and from here went immediately into Mr. Reeve’s law-school, and after the accustomed period of study was admitted to the bar, and immediately HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. settled in practice in Litchfield, where he spent his life. He confined himself almost entirely to the practice of Litchfield County, though occasionally, when called, in consequence of the eminence to which hesoon attained in the profession, he practiced in other counties in some cases of importance, and especially in the Federal Circuit Court, in which, for a few years after the formation of the present Constitution of the United States, some considerable business was done. Mr. Allen, however, never went abroad in quest of business, thinking that the very great share of attorney business which he acquired in being al- ways found in his office equal, at least in point of profit, to what counselor business he might obtain by attending courts in other counties, considering that all the counselor business flowing from the attorney business which he did he was sure to be engaged in. From the time I entered the law-school, in the fall of 1798, I occupied a room in his office, and had free ac- cess to his ample library, and boarded at the same house with him. During all that time, and all the remaining years of his prosperous practice, which indeed lasted till the apparent commencement of his rapid decline, soon followed by death, he was engaged in almost every case of any importance in the Supe- rior and County Court. He was certainly a very suc- cessful and powerful advocate, equally with the jury as with the court, a thoroughly read lawyer, equal in point of legal science to any one at our bar during the fore part of the time I am speaking of, except Tapping Reeve, who had no rival, and in the latter part of the period James Gould, of whom I need say nothing, as you knew him in his meridian light. Mr. Allen always made diligent and faithful preparation of all cases committed to his care, and made himself fully acquainted with every point of law and every accessible point of evidence which could arise in the case, and was, therefore, usually successful when the case deserved success. “He was six feet four or five inches high, very erect, and with an attitude and walk well calculated to set off his full stature, and, though quite lean, weighed full two hundred and thirty pounds. His countenance was strongly marked and truly formi- dable, his eyes and eyebrows dark, his hair dark, what little he had, for he was quite bald, far back, even be- fore middle age, and indeed his whole appearance was calculated to inspire dread rather than affection. His manners and conversation were, however, such as to inspire confidence and respect, though little cal- culated to invite familiarity, except with his intimates, of whom he had a few, and those, knowing the gen- erous and hearty friendship of which he was capable, were usually much attached to him and ready to over- look all his harsh sallies, imputing them to the ‘rough humor which his mother gave him.’ His feelings were not refined, but ardent, generous, and hearty. His friendships were strong and his aversions equally 80, and, as I used to say of him speaking to others, BENCH AND BAR. 17 ‘his feelings were all of the great sort.’ He neither enjoyed nor suffered anything from many of those little incidents which so often affect, either pleasingly or painfully, minds of a more refined texture. As he had no taste for such things, nor, as it would seem, any faculty of perceiving, so he knew no language appropriate to their description, but in respect to those things and principles which he thought worthy of his regard he lacked no power of language to make him- self fully and forcibly understood. For neutral ground, either in morals or politics, he had no taste, and but little less than absolute abhorrence. As a specimen of his feelings and language, better than I describe, I will give you the laconic answer to an inquiry of him, why he took the Aurora, the leading Demo- cratic paper in the county, then under the guidance of that arch-Democrat, Duane; he replied it was be- cause he wanted to know what they were about in the in- Jernal regions. And after giving this specimen I need make no further attempt to give you an idea of his humor, manners, and language. “ After Mr, Allen was married, which was not till he was towards forty years old, and went to house- keeping, I boarded at his house at his express solicita- tion for many years while attending court, though he took no other one, nor ever named to me any price, nor would he count the money I handed to him when leaving for home, seeming to receive it only because I refused to stay on any other terms. I therefore saw much of him in his family, where his conduct was always dignified, proper, and kind. He was proud, very proud, and justly so, of his wife, who was a woman of much personal beauty, polished manners, and great and even singular discretion, and for whom he entertained, I believe, an ardent affection. “Before his marriage and at the age of thirty-five Mr. Allen was elected a member of the Fifth Con- gress, where he distinguished himself at a time when Connecticut was never more ably represented in the House of Representatives, and would undoubtedly have been chosen for as long a period as he would have desired to be a member of that body, but he declined a further election. He was elected an as- sistant in 1800, and was re-elected for the five suc- ceeding years, and as such was one of the judges of the Supreme Court of Errors. For several years pre- vious to his election to Congress he had represented the town of Litchfield in the General Assembly. His wife was a granddaughter of the first Governor Gris- wold. “ BARZILLAI SLOSSON.—In speaking of Mr. Slosson, I must first observe that I had formed a tolerably correct notion of him before I ever saw him. When I was a boy his father was often at my father’s house, intimately acquainted there, and, I believe, scarcely ever passed that way without calling and holding a pretty long chat, for he never was in a hurry, and his peculiar turn of mind, abundance of common sense, and great fund of wit, joined to his singularly slow, emphatic, and sententious mode of talking, was such as to secure the attention of any one, and especially aboy. He used occasionally to speak of his children, and especially of his oldest son, Barzillai, of whom he was manifestly very proud, representing him to be always at the head of the school when small, and af- terwards used to speak with high gratification of his industry and tact at acquiring the higher branches of knowledge without the aid of an instructor, and more particularly the knowledge of the dead lan- guages, of which he knew nothing himself. And this account given by the old gentleman, from intimate in- tercourse and frequent conversation with his son when I afterwards became acquainted with him, I found was by no means exaggerated. And to his excellent and accurate common-school education he owed much, very much, of his character for exact accuracy and correct- ness in all that he said and did through life. He was about the best reader I ever heard, wrote a fair, hand- some, and legible hand, and in the unfailing correct- ness of his orthography and use of terms no lexicog- rapher excelled him, and in everything pertaining to mere English, home, and common-school education no one appeared to be a more thorough proficient. And in Greek and Latin I never saw his superior, except old President Stiles, nor, with that exception perhaps, his equal, unless it was old Parson Farrand, of Canaan, and in the other branches of collegiate education he was, to say the least, above mediocrity. As he entered college not until the senior year, and, I believe, did not even attend during the whole of that year, he could not, of course, expect to shine and did not shine in the college honors depending upon the faculty, but availed himself of the right to become a candidate for the honors of Dean Scholar, and ob- tained the first premium for excellence in Greek and Latin in a class of unusually high reputation. This, I suppose, he did merely out of a laudable pride, for he did not avail himself of the pecuniary reward, which would have required him to reside in New Haven; for he went, immediately after his gradua- tion, with one of his classmates (Mr.—afterwards the Rev. Dr.—Smith) to reside in Sharon as one of the instructors in the Sharon Academy, then in full and successful operation. He soon after became a stu- dent-at-law under Governor Smith’s instruction, and the first County Court, which sat after his two years’ clerkship had expired, being in Fairfield County, he went there for examination and admission to the bar. This was, I believe, at the November term, 1793. It was not until he began to attend court at Litchfield, and while I was in the law-school there, that I first became personally acquainted with Mr. Slosson, though I had barely seen him once or twice before. After my admission to the bar, being located in ad- joining towns, we often met each other before justices, and consequently before the upper courts. From our frequent meetings and intercourse at Litchfield and elsewhere I became greatly attached to him, and 18 finally for a number of years he and I, with South- mayd for our constant companion, always occupied the same room at Catlin’s Hotel during every court until his death, and there was the last time I ever saw him in life. Soon after the court adjourned, hearing of his rapid decline, I set out to visit him, and on the way heard that he had died the night before. I however went on and stayed with the fam- ily until I assisted in burying him. This was in Jan- uary, 1818, and in that grave I felt that I had buried a sincere, and I am sure a much-loved, friend, on whose character and conduct in life I could reflect with melancholy satisfaction unmarred by a single reproachful recollection or one which I could wish to have forgotten. “Mr. Slosson’s great fondness for ancient litera- ture rendered him scarcely just in his comparative esti- mate of that with modern improvements. Asa lawyer he was highly respectable in theory and remarkably accurate in practice; as a pleader I do not remember that he ever had occasion to ask for an amendment or to alter a tittle of what he had written. As an advocate he was clear, deliberate, methodical, and logical in his deductions. He spoke in much of the peculiarly emphatic manner of his father above mentioned, though not with his unusual slowness. He was always cool and self-possessed, rarely warm- ing into any high degree of animation or aiming at effect to appear eloquent, but he never failed to secure a respectful and satisfied attention. Though not one of the most leading advocates, of which there are al- ways some three or four at the bar, he might, at least, be estimated an equal to any of the second class of the Litchfield bar, which was then certainly a highly respectable one. “Though not an aspirant after public preferment, and from his habitually modest and retiring habits not calculated to push his way when opportunities offered, he was yet at the time of his decease in a fair way of promotion. He was early and often elected to the Legislature from his native town, and indeed their usual representative until the October session, 1812, when he was elected clerk, which in those days was a sure stepping-stone to future advancement; and having myself been a witness of the manner in which he performed the duties of that office, for which no man was better qualified, I am sure he es- tablished a reputation, which, had Providence per- mitted, promised a solid and lasting existence, “Mr. Slosson’s political opinions were of the gen- uine Washingtonian political school. None of your heady, rash, and merely partisan notions found favor with him. He was a constant and honest adherent to the political views then prevalent in this State. “The foregoing sketch of the leading incidents in Mr. Slosson’s life may be a sufficient indication from which to deduce his true character, but I must indulge myself in adding that I never knew or heard of a single act of his life, either in youth or mature years, HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. that left even a shade upon his reputation. Cooland deliberate in his temperament, never hurried away by enthusiasm,—for enthusiasm never manifested it- self in his nature except in his passion for ancient literature,—he was sure to think and act with pro- priety. He was nevertheless warm and faithful in his attachments, but not so far as to warp his con- scientious regard for integrity. He was perfectly just and generous in his intercourse with the world, honest in his predilections, and uncompromising in his love of virtue and detestation of vice. In moral- ity his principles were without a taint, and his prac- tice through life in conscientious conformity with them. In religion he was a firm and steadfast believer in the great doctrines of the gospel, though not a public pro- fessor. His principles were those of true rational Calvinism, unswayed by vindictive zeal or hysterical weakness. “He was a small man, not much, if any, under medium height, but of slender frame and counte- nance. Though not dark complexioned his coun- tenance was rather dusky, his skin not clear; his features, though far from handsome, bespoke intelli- gence, and were therefore not disagreeable. His gen- eral appearance was more like that of the late Leman Church than any other member of the bar I can think of, though he was somewhat larger and more erect. “SAMUEL W. SouTHMAYD.—In the life, conduct, and character of Samuel W. Southmayd there were some peculiarities, such as render it a matter of diffi- culty to describe him in such a manner as to make them intelligible to one who did not personally know him. “YT never saw or heard of him until I became a member of the law-school, in the fall of the year 1798, of which he had then been a member about one year, I believe, and of which he continued a constant at- tendant during the eighteen months which I spent there. He was admitted to the bar the next term after I was,—to wit, September term, 1795,—and passed as good an examination as I ever heard there or elsewhere, he having been for the full periéd of three years under Judge Reeve’s tuition. He was a native of Watertown, where he settled in practice, and where he spent his life. Like Mr. Slosson, he had an ex- cellent common-school education. Beyond that his acquirements did not extend far in an academic course, enough, however, I believe, to enable him to under- stand the homely law Latin used in our books. Few have entered upon the practice of law with a better store of legal learning than Mr. Southmayd, but the place in which he settled was not calculated from its location and the habits of the people, by no means litigious, to furnish much practice, and he was too honest to promote litigation; and furthermore, he had no legal adversary there except an old gentleman who never had any more legal learning than was necessary for a church warden, and whose ignorance made him the victim of Southmayd’s merry witchery BENCH AND BAR. 19 and innocent cunning, of both of which he had a superabundance, though he never indulged in ma- licious or even very serious mischief, and indeed in none except such as would do to relate for the pur- pose of making fun in merry company. Anecdotes of that description used to be related in great num- bers. Asa pleader Mr. Southmayd was always sure to have all in his drafts which was requisite and per- tinent to the object in view, and in all his declarations affording room for coloring circumstances to be in- serted there was pretty sure to be found, slyly slipped in, some ingenious slang whang, or Southmaydism, as we used to call it. He was not ambitious of argu- ing cases in court, but when he did he always dis- played much ingenuity, and attracted respectful at- tention from the audience as well as from the triers. And before arbitrators, referees, and committees a more formidable opponent could hardly be found. And although his practice was not large, and as was observed of Mr. Slosson he was not among the lead- ing practitioners at the Litchfield bar, he was certainly a very respectable lawyer, upon a par with the fore- most of the second class, and much beloved and re- spected by all whose good opinions are desirable. “ As was observed in the outset, there were peculi- arities in Mr. Southmayd’s private character and de- portment which it is difficult to describe or reconcile. Though of a benevolent disposition and full of good nature and kind feelings, there was yet in him a vein of adventure after intellectual amusement, which, from its very nature, could not be gratified but at the ex- pense of others, and often to such an extent as to render them ridiculous in the view of third persons to whom the result of the adventure was related. I have many times joined most heartily in the laugh at the relation of the result of many such seemingly innocent pieces of roguery, though I could not help condemning the mischief while participating in its fruits. In all such indulgences Southmayd never entertained the least malice, for his heart was a stranger to it, but his in- tense love of fun and enjoyment of the ridiculous often impelled him to go beyond the line of honest propriety. I used often to reproach him with it, but my admonitions were not well calculated to take effect when given at the close of a hearty laugh. “From what I have been saying of Mr. Southmayd you would, I presume, be ready to conclude that he was one of the most cheerly and happy of men. But the case was directly the reverse, and during a consid- erable period of his life, and that, too, the most val- uable part of it, he was a very unhappy man indeed, and I have no doubt he had recourse to much of the indulgence of that peculiar propensity I have at- tempted to describe for the purpose of dispelling a mental malady which for a long time oppressed and preyed upon his heart. He was for many years the victim of the strongest species of hypochondria that ever mortal man was. It never showed itself in long fits of settled melancholy or monomania, but in sud- den fits and starts. After hours of cheerful conversa- tion, and while in entire health, he would suddenly complain of great distress, and exhibit unmistakable evidence of great terror and apprehension of imme- diate dissolution. One very extraordinary instance I will relate. He and I had been alone many hours, conversing and reading together, and he not in the least complaining, when he at once sprung from his seat and with a scream as would have alarmed me had it been any other person, and pressing both hands upon his breast, he exclaimed that he was going to die immediately. I stepped to him and gently and calmly said to him, ‘Don’t be alarmed, you are not going ta die’ (for we never treated him as if we thought his distress imaginary), and put my hand gently upon him to lead him to the bed, when he raised one hand from his breast and thrusting his finger against the side of his head declared, with another outery, that something was passing through his head. I persuaded him to lie down, telling him the feeling would pass off in a few minutes, but he continued to groan for some time. I, knowing what would cure him, took up and began to read to him one of Burke’s finest essays, which lay by me, and, turning to a passage of extraordinary eloquence, read_it, on which he sprung up on end in the bed, and exclaimed, ‘ Was ever anything finer than that!’ I continued on reading, and in the course of half an hour he was well and cheerful as ever. This was the most extraordinary instance I ever saw in him, but those in a degree like it were frequent. He always went to bed an hour or two before Slosson and I did, he saying that he never was able to get asleep until he had gone through a great deal of such feelings as he never would attempt to describe. “Mr. Southmayd was greatly esteemed in his na- tive town by, I believe, almost every one, both old and young. He was early in life sent to the Legislature, and that often, and was so, I know, the last year of his life. He died of lung fever in March, 1813, about two months after the death of his friend Slosson. At the December term, 1812, the three who had so long occupied the same room in perfect harmony were for the last time there together. At the February term of the Supreme Court, Southmayd and I occupied it, but felt that we were in solitude, and in the next term it seemed to me most emphatically a solitude, and more like a family vault than like an abode for living men, and I believe I have never been into it since. “Mr, Southmayd was undoubtedly an honest and honorable man, of uncommon pleasing manners and much beloved, and I never heard that he had an enemy. Indeed, the amenity of his manners and the gentleness of his temper almost forbade it. “The family to which Mr. Southmayd belonged was of the Congregational order, and two of his sis- ters married Congregational clergymen. He, how- ever, joined himself to the Episcopal Church, , of which he was a member after he settled in life, and 20 of which I believe he was a communicant, but am not sure. He died unmarried, and I believe in the thirty-ninth or fortieth year of his age. “Hon. Jonw Corron Smiru, the most eminent citizen of the town of Sharon, was a son of Rev. Cotton Mather Smith, and was born Feb. 12, 1765. He was graduated at Yale College in 1788, ad- mitted to the bar of Litchfield County in 1786, and married to Miss Margaret Evertson, of Amenia, N. Y., in October of the same year. Their only child, the late William M. Smith, Esq., was born in August, 1787. Mr. Smith was soon introduced into the active duties of his profession in his native town by reason of the pecuniary embarrassments of the community in consequence of the Revolutionary war, and particularly from the extensive and embarrassed affairs of his uncle, Dr. Simeon Smith, who removed to Vermont, leaving the management of his extensive and complicated concerns in the hands of his young and inexperienced nephew. Through unwearied ex- ertions he was able to extricate the affairs of his uncle from a nearly hopeless condition by the full pay- ment of all just demands against him, and leaving him at last in the enjoyment of a handsome estate. It is but justice to his uncle to say that he, having no children of his own, made ample compensation to his nephew by the bequest in his will of a large and valuable estate. He was first elected to the Legis- lature in 1793, and was very frequently a member, and twice Speaker before 1800, when he was elected a member of Congress. There he remained six years, when the declining health of his father compelled his resignation. He was immediately elected to the Leg- islature of the State, and represented the town with- out intermission till 1809, and held the place of Speaker at each session. He was then elected to the Council, and in the October session of the same year was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court. In 1811 he was elected lieutenant-governor, and in 1813 Governor, of his native State. In this office he was continued till 1817, when the public voice demanded a change in the form of the government of the State, and the substitution of a written constitution for the less stable provisions of the charter of King Charles II. Governor Smith, not,sympathizing with the ma- jority on this question, retired to private life, and lived, for nearly thirty years, a private citizen of Sharon. In public life he was never appointed to a position which he was not fully competent to fill. As a presiding officer in a deliberative assembly he had no peer, and although while he was member of Con- gress, except for one short term, he was associated in principle and feeling with the minority, he was called upon to preside in committee of the whole more fre- quently than any other member. The late Luther Holley, an eminent citizen of Salisbury, who had been a member of the Legislature when Governor Smith was Speaker, once remarked that he had never seen aman who could take a paper from the table HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. and lay it back again so handsomely as could John Cotton Smith. “In private life Governor Smith was a fine speci- men of the polished Christian gentleman. He de- voted some of his time to reviewing the studies of his early life, and in the preparation of useful and entertaining articles for the more elevated literary periodicals. He was for several years president of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, and of the American Bible Society, which latter office he retained till his death, which occurred on the 7th day of December, 1845, when he had nearly reached the age of eighty-one years. “ NATHANIEL SmiTH.*—I received a line from my friend, Gen. Sedgwick, stating that it was your de- sire that he would ask of me, in your behalf, to furnish you with some facts in relation to the late Nathaniel Smith, and my views of his character, which might be of use to you in the preparation of the work you have in hand. “T am, of course, aware that this application is owing to the accidental circumstance that I am the oldest, if not the only, member of the profession now living who had much personal acquaintance with that truly able and excellent man, or saw much of him in the exercise of his forensic or judicial talents. Judge Smith was indeed one of nature’s nobles, and, considering the limited range of his early education, he had few equals and perhaps no superior in the profession which he chose, and which he eminently adorned. You are doubtless aware that Judge Smith had only such an education in childhood and youth as the common schools of the country afforded at the time. It was such, however, as a boy of unusual capacity and industrious habits would acquire from such a source, and such as, under the guidance of un- common discretion through life, rarely permitted its defects to be disclosed. “When I first went to the law-school in Litch- field, which was in the fall of 1793, Mr. Smith, though not over thirty years old, was in full practice, and engaged in almost every cause of any import- ance. Indeed, he was said to have established a high reputation for talents in the first cause he argued in the higher courts. It was upon a trial for man- slaughter, which arose in his native town, and in which he appeared as junior counsel, and astonished the court, the bar, and all who heard him. Not long afterwards, in the celebrated case of Jedediah Strong and wife, before the General Assembly (she having applied for a divorce), he greatly distinguished him- self again, and thus became known throughout the State as a young lawyer of the first promise, and the reputation thus early acquired was never suffered to falter, but, on the other hand, steadily increased in strength until his elevation to the bench. “During my stay in Litchfield, and after my ad- a es * From Hollister's “ History of Connecticut.” BENCH AND BAR. 21 mission to the bar, I of course saw Mr. Smith, and heard him in almost all the important cases there ; and as I was located in the southwest corner town in the county, adjoining Fairfield, I almost immediately obtained some business which, though small, was such as during nearly all my professional life caused me to attend the courts in that county, where I found Mr. Smith as fully engaged and as highly esteemed as in his own county. In New Haven I also know he had a very considerable practice. “Tt is worthy also to be observed, in forming an estimate of Mr. Smith’s professional talent and char- acter, that there never at any period was an abler bar in Connecticut than during his practice. In Litch- field County were Judge Reeve, Judge Adams, Gen. Tracy, John Allen, Judge Gould, N. B. Benedict, and others; at the Fairfield County bar were Pier- pont Edwards, Judge Ingersoll, and Judge Daggett, constantly from New Haven, Judge Edmunds, 8. B. Sherwood, R. M. Sherman, Judge Chapman, and Governor Bissell; and in New Haven, besides the three above named, were James Hillhouse, Judge Baldwin, and others. “As I suppose it not probable that you ever saw Judge Smith, as he ceased to attend courts in 1819, and died when you were very young, I will observe, what you have doubtless heard, that he was a large and fine-appearing man, much of the same com- plexion of the Hon. Truman Smith, his nephew, with whom you are so well acquainted ; less tall than he, but of rather fuller habit. His face was not only the index of high capacity and solid judgment, but un- commonly handsome; his hair was dark and thin, though not to baldness, except on the fore part of his head, and was very slightly sprinkled with gray. His fine, dark eyes were remarkably pleasing and gentle in ordinary intercourse, but very variable; always kindling when highly excited in debate, they became almost oppressive. His voice was excellent, being both powerful and harmonious, and never broke under any exertion of its capacity. His manner was very ardent and the seeming dictate of a strong con- viction of the justice of his cause, and his gestures were the natural expression of such a conviction. Mr. Smith’s style was pure and genuine Saxon, with no attempt at classic ornament or allusion. His train of reasoning was lucid and direct, and evincive of the fact that the whole of it was like a map spread out in his mind’s eye from the beginning. His in- genuity was always felt and dreaded by his opponent. He spoke with much fluency, but with no undue rapidity ; he never hesitated for or haggled at a word, nor did he ever tire his audience with undue pro- lixity, or omit to do full justice to his case for fear of tiring them ; and indeed there was little danger of it. Though certainly a very fine speaker, he never achieved or aspired to those strains of almost super- human eloquence with which his old master Reeve sometimes electrified and astonished his audience, and yet, in ordinary cases, he was the most correct speaker of the two, though Judge Reeve was, and he was not,a scholar. Mr. Smith, though quite unas- suming, and often receding in common intercourse and conversation, was, when heated in argument, it must be confessed, often overbearing to the adverse party, and not only them, but to their counsel. Upon all other occasions he appeared to be, and I believe was, a very kind-hearted, agreeable, and pleasant man. To me he always so appeared, and I have been much in his company. “Mr. Smith came early into public life, and was frequently elected to the General Assembly from Woodbury. In 1795 he was elected a member of the Fourth Congress, and in 1797 he was chosen to the Fifth Congress, but declined further election. In May, 1799, he was made an assistant, and was re-elected for the five following years, when he resigned his seat at that board in consequence of the passage of the act in 1808 prohibiting the members of the then Supreme Court of Errors from practicing before that court. He remained in full practice at the bar until October, 1806, when he was elected a judge of the Superior Court and continued to fill that office until May, 1819, when the judiciary establishment of that year went into operation, from which time he remained in private life until his death. “In every public station in which Mr. Smith was placed he distinguished himself. He did so in Con- gress, at a time when our representation was as able, perhaps, as it ever has been, and when the character of the house to which be belonged was far higher than it nowis. Inthe Superior Court he was certainly very greatly respected and admired as an able and perfectly upright judge. “Tn private life his name was free from all reproach. A strictly honest and pure life, free from any of those little blemishes which often mar the fame of distin- guished men, may, I think, be fairly claimed by his biographer to be his due. As a husband, a parent, a friend, a neighbor, a moralist, and a Christian, I be- lieve few have left a more faultless name.” “ JameEs GouLD, the son of Dr. William Gould, an eminent physician, was born at Brandford, in this State, in the year 1770. The goodness of his com- mon-school education is inferable from the perfect accuracy of it, which showed itself in all he did or said in after-life. He graduated, when a little over twenty-one, at Yale College, in September, 1791, with distinguished honor in a class distinguished for talents. “The year next following his collegiate course he spent in Baltimore as a teacher. He then returned to New Haven and commenced the study of law with Judge Chauncey; and in September of that year he was chosen a tutor in Yale College, in which office he continued two years. He then joined the law-school of Mr. Reeve, at Litchfield, and was soon after ad- mitted to the bar. Immediately after his admission bo bo HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. to the bar he opened an office for practice in that town, where he resided during the remainder of his life. “On his first appearance as an advocate he evinced such an apparent maturity of intellect, such a self- possession, such command of his thoughts and of the language appropriate to their expression, that he was marked out as a successful aspirant for forensic emi- nence. His progress in the acquisition of professional business was steady and rapid. “Fortunate circumstances concurring a few years before his choice of Litchfield as the field of his pro- fessional labors, in the removal by promotion of two very distinguished practitioners at that bar, opened the way to such a choice, and by like good fortune a similar event removed one of the two only remaining obstructions in that town to his full share in the best business as an advocate, the only business to which he aspired. As a reasoner Mr. Gould was forcible, lucid, and logical; as a speaker his voice was very pleasant and his language pure, clear, and always appropriate. He never aspired to high strains of impassioned elo- quence, and rarely, if ever, addressed himself to the passions of the court and jury, but to their under- standing only, and was a very able, pleasing, and successful advocate. His argument was a fair map of the case, and one sometimes engaged against him, but feeling his superiority, observed that he had rather have Gould against him in a case than any other of anywhere equal powers, because he could perfectly understand his argument, and if susceptible of an answer could know how to apply it. In his practice at the bar he was always perfectly fair and honorable. Within some two or three years after Mr. Gould com- menced practice, Mr. Reeve, the founder and until that time the sole instructor of the Litchfield Law- School, accepted a seat upon the bench of the Su- perior Court. This court made it necessary for him to give up the school or to associate some one with him in its management, and to deliver lectures in his absence upon the circuits. The judge selected Mr. Gould as that associate, and for a number of years they jointly conducted and received the profits of the school; and on the final retiring of Judge Reeve from any participation in the instruction of the school, Mr. Gould became its sole instructor and so continued until elevated to the bench of the Superior Court in the spring of 1816, when he in turn had to have recourse to temporary aid for the short time he remained on the bench. But a thorough political revolution having taken place in this State, and a new constitution formed which entirely new-modeled the courts of law, Mr. Gould took no further share in public employments; and, his health being greatly impaired, he never resumed practice at the bar, but confined himself wholly to his school during the re- mainder of his life, as far as severe infirmities would permit. He died, as appears by the college catalogue, in 1838. “Tn person Mr. Gould was very handsome. Of about medium height, or perhaps a little over, but rather less in body and limbs than medium size; his complexion fair, with fine dark eyes and beautiful brown hair; all his features good, and in connection indicative of much intelligence and good nature, and his form for symmetry and gracefulness could hardly have been mended; and in all respects, in body, mind, and education, he may be fairly styled a fin- ished man. In private and social intercourse he was highly pleasing, facetious, and witty. “Soon after his settlement in Litchfield he married the eldest daughter of the Hon. Uriah Tracy, so well known for his long and distinguished services in the councils of the State and nation. “Mrs. Gould in person and mind was a fit wife for such a husband, and partook with him in the happi- ness of raising a very numerous and promising family of children. “Judge Gould wrote and published a volume of pleadings, which, together with his fame as an in- structor, gave him a distinguished name among the eminent jurists of the country.” “Hon, NoAn BENNET BENEDICT was a native of Woodbury, in which he resided during his whole life. He was the son of the Rev. Noah Benedict, long the pastor of the First Congregational Church in that town. Mr. Benedict’s early school education must have been correct and good, as its fruits invariably showed itself in after-life. He graduated at Yale College in September, 1788, when a little short of eighteen years of age. His legal studies commenced soon after his graduation, which were, I believe, pur- sued principally, if not wholly, in the office of his brother-in-law, Nathaniel Smith, afterwards so highly distinguished as a jurist, which was near the residence of Mr. Benedict’s father. As soon as he arrived to lawful age Mr. Benedict came to the bar, and for the remainder of his life—to wit, about thirty-nine years— it is believed he never failed to attend every regular session of the courts holden at Litchfield; and, though he never habitually attended courts in other counties, he occasionally did so for the purpose of arguing a particular case. During the long course of his prac- tice Mr. Benedict had an ample share of business, and for the latter half of that period he was, especially in the Superior Court, the leading advocate on one side or the other in most of the trials either to the court or to the jury. His management of a trial was discreet, his arguments sound, sensible, and, being aided by the well-known and generally esteemed in- tegrity of his character, had their due effect, He never attempted to play the orator or to attract atten- tion by fine turned periods, but contented himself with plain reasoning, of which he was no indifferent master. “At a very early period Mr. Benedict was a mem- ber of the Legislature. But the political majority of the voters in Woodbury, becoming about this time JAMES GOULD. BENCH AND BAR. 23 and for long afterwards decidedly Democratic, proved an effectual bar to his political promotion, as far as depended upon that town, but by the vote of the State at large he was elected in 1813 one of the twelve as- sistants (as they were then styled who composed the upper house of the Assembly), and was re-elected the two following years; but in the year 1818 an entire political revolution took place in Connecticut, and Mr. Benedict shared the fate of almost every one who held any post of dignity or profit depending upon public suffrage at large in the State. He was subse- quently many years later elected once more to the lower house. He was also for several years judge of probate for the district of Woodbury, an appointment then depending upon the Legislature. Mr. Benedict was twice married, but left no living issue. He died in June or July, 1831, at the age of sixty, or in his sixtieth year. “Tn private life Mr. Benedict was entirely unas- suming, and a very pleasing companion to all who could relish purity of moral character and conduct, which his whole life was an eminent example; his feelings were peculiarly sensitive and delicate; a loose or profane expression never escaped his lips; and in- deed so fastidious was he in respect to the former that it used to be a matter of amusement with his less scrupulous associates in jocose conversation to tease his feminine delicacy upon such subjects. Though when alone and unoccupied he had a propensity to indulge in somewhat gloomy reflections, yet he was not averse to participate in facetious conversation when due delicacy was observed. He had a profound respect for religion, and was in all respects a good, a very good, man. “Mr. Benedict was of somewhat less than middling size, of a medium complexion, but his eyes and hair rather dark. “Hon. JABEZ W. HUNTINGTON, son of the late Gen. Zachariah Huntington, of Norwich, and grandson of the Hon. Jabez Huntington, of that place, the as- sistant and associate of the first Governor Trumbull, was born in Norwich in the year 1787 or 1788. He received his early training and instruction in his na- tive town, which after-times evinced to be accurate and good. He became a member of Yale College in September, 1802, and graduated in September, 1806, with the reputation of a good scholar. Soon after his graduation he became a teacher in an academic school under the government of its founder, Esquire Morris, of Litchfield South Farms, as then called, now the town of Morris, named after the founder of said school. After about a year thus employed, Mr. Hun- tington entered Judge Reeve’s law-school, in which he continued a diligent student until admitted to the bar in Litchfield County, of which he soon showed himself to be a worthy member, and in due time a distinguished one, he having commenced the practice of his profession in Litchfield, and there continued it until its final termination by an office conferred upon him incompatible with its further pursuit. In prac- tice his whole aim and ambition was to become an advocate, and had no desire to obtain any share of collecting business, though in many hands not less lucrative, and, as he was always ready to aid the less ambitious of speaking, he early acquired a very con- siderable share of the portion of practice of which he was ambitious, and which was improving to him. His forte as an advocate was in detecting error in declarations and other parts of pleadings, and in a lucid manner of pointing them out. Upon the whole, he was an advocate clear and accurate, rather than peculiar for the gracefulness of manner or refinement of diction, though his manner was by no means dis- gusting, and his language entirely free from any ap- proach to vulgarity. His manners were pleasing and popular, and he repeatedly represented Litchfield in the General Assembly, and distinguished himself there. He was elected to the Twenty-first Congress, and re-elected to the Twenty-second and Twenty- third Congresses, and near the expiration of the last of his congressional career he was chosen a judge of the Superior Court, and held that office until 1840, when, being chosen a senator of the United States, he re- signed the judgeship and accepted the latter appoint- ment, and continued to hold it by virtue of a second appointment until his death, in 1847, in all which stations he performed the duties thereof with honor to himself and to the entire satisfaction of the public. His moral character was irreproachable ; a professor of religion and an observer of its precepts. Late in life he was married, but it is believed left no issue. Soon after election to Congress he removed to his na- tive town, and died there. “ PHINEAS MINER, a very respectable and some- what eminent member of the Litchfield County bar, was a native of Winchester, in that county, and there, and in that region, as far as by the writer hereof known, received his entire training and education in all respects. At an early period in life he commenced the practice of law in the place of his birth, in the society of Winsted, as is believed, a place of a great deal of active manufacturing business and furnishing an ample share of employment for gentlemen of the legal profession, of which Mr. Miner soon acquired an ample share, and at no distant period an engrossing one, with which he appeared in court from term to term until he felt warranted in the expectation of drawing after him an engagement in all the disputa- ble cases from that fruitful quarter, when he removed to Litchfied, and was much employed as an advocate for a number of years, and until his health rather prema- turely failed, and he became the victim of great men- tal and bodily suffering, until relieved by death before reaching the ordinary period at which old age begins to make its effects much perceptible in the human frame. As an advocate Mr. Miner was ardent, impas- sioned, and fluent, but in his apparent great ambition to be eloquent he often made use of figures of speech 24 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. which a more chastened and correct training in youth would have taught him to avoid, and less wounding to an ear of taste, but the fault apparent to all was the extreme prolixity of his arguments, but, these faults notwithstanding, Mr. Miner was a respectable and able advocate. “Before his removal to Litchfield, Mr. Miner was an early and frequent member of the Legislature from his native town, and after his removal there a member of the State Senate for the Fifteenth District, and was also elected to fill a vacancy in the second session of the Twenty-third Congress. “Mr. Miner was twice married, but, it is believed, left. no issue, but of this the writer is uncertain. He led a strictly moral life, and was justly esteemed a good man. “LEMAN CHURCH, a late member of the Litchfield County bar, was a native of Salisbury, in this county, a son of an opulent farmer of that town, and in it, it is supposed, he received his education, both scholastic and professional, the latter in the office of his half- brother, Samuel Church, afterwards a judge of the Superior Court, and finally chief justice of the same; and after his admission to the bar he opened an office in North Canaan, where he resided during the. re- mainder of his life. Mr. Church was successful in acquiring at an early period a promising share of pro- fessional business, which steadily increased, until by the middle of professional life he occupied a stand among the leading advocates at the bar; and towards the close of life there was scarce a cause, especially in the higher courts, of considerable im- portance, discussed in which he was not engaged. “In September, 1838, Mr. Church was appointed by the court State’s attorney as successor to his brother Samuel, on the latter’s elevation to the bench of the Superior Court, and held that office by annual reap- pointments until September term, 1838, when by a political change in the court he was required to yield the place to another; it is believed, however, that he afterwards for a time reoccupied that place, but not positively recollected. “As a speaker he was cool, unimpassioned, and in- genious; he never attempted to affect the passions of those he addressed, and, being destitute of passion himself, was consequently incapable of moving the passions of others; he never attempted to be eloquent or made use of a merely ornate expression, his object in speaking was effect, and that wholly directed to his cause and not to himself; in the management of a case he was always cool and self-possessed ; no sudden and unexpected turn in the progress of a trial discon- certed him or appeared to be unexpected by him; no collision at the bar ever appeared to affect his temper in the least. With such a temperament, it is obvious that the legal profession was of all the professions the one for him, and that in which he was calculated to excel. “Mr, Church was always entirely regardless of per- sonal appearance and dress; he was very small, meagre, and ill formed, his features quite ordinary, but all this very indifferent appearance was rescued from inattention by a most remarkably attractive and intelligent eye. “Mr. Church was frequently a representative to the Legislature from Canaan, and never failed to make an impression upon that body; and to his sagacious management is attributable the preservation of the Housatonic Railroad from ruin, as a commissioner thereon appointed by the Legislature, with power, to- gether with his associate in office, Mr. Pond, to sell and consequently to destroy the road, which seemed to be a favorite object with them for a time. “Mr. Church died in the midst of life as a profes- sional man, July, 1849.” The Hon. ANSEL STERLING was born in Lyme, Conn., Feb. 3, 1782, the seventh son of William Ster- ling, a man of position and considerable wealth in that town. His grandfather, Joseph Sterling, born in 1700, was one of the early settlers of Lyme: The name originally was spelt Stirling, as seen in the old cemetery in that place. On the maternal side Judge Sterling is descended from William Hyde, whose name is on the monument in the old cemetery at Hartford, Conn., as one of the original settlers of 1636, and one of the original pro- prietors of the town of Norwich, Conn. Mr. Hyde’s great-great-great-granddaughter, Jemi- ma Sill, married Capt. William Stirling, Jan. 3, 1763, the subject of this sketch being their tenth child and seventh son. Judge Sterling, at the early age of twenty-three, was a practicing lawyer at the bar of Litchfield County, and for forty years there were no interrup- tions to his attending each session of the different courts. He studied his profession with his eldest brother, Hon. Elisha Sterling, of Salisbury, Conn., who was a graduate of the class of 1787 of Yale Col- lege, “a man of a high order of talent.” Judge Sterling settled in Sharon in the year 1808, where he spent his life. Oct. 8, 1804, he married Isabella Canfield, seventh daughter of Hon. John Canfield and Dorcas Buell, of Sharon. Hon. John Canfield was a son of Samuel Canfield, Esq., of New Milford, Conn., a judge of the court of Litchfield County, and deacon of the Congregational Church in that place. Samuel Canfield’s wife was Elizabeth Judson, the great-great-granddaughter of William Judson, who came from Yorkshire, England, in 1634. The Hon. John Canfield was born in New Milford, Conn., 1740; was graduated at Yale College 1762. He was a great-grandson of Matthew Canfield, an original settler of Norwalk, Conn., a judge and leading man in the colony. Hinman says,— “As a proof of his standing, I may only mention he was one of the nineteen signers of the petition to King Charles II. for the Charter of the colony, and his name is mentioned in that invaluable grant to Con- BENCH AND BAR. necticut in 1662. This is ample proof of his exalted standing in the colony, as no gentleman would have been called upon to sign the peti- tion but such men as had sustained a high reputation in England before they came to New England.” John Canfield established himself in his profession in Sharon, 1765, being the jirst lawyer in the town. He fitted for the legal profession several gentlemen who afterwards rose to eminence; among them his son-in-law, Ambrose Spencer, chief justice of the State of New York, Hon. John Cotton Smith, and Noah Webster. “Mr. Canfield enjoyed a most enviable reputation and was held in the highest estimation by his fellow- citizens. He represented the town in the Legislature at ten different sessions.” In 1786 he was elected a member of the Continental Congress, but died on the 26th of October of the same year. Not living to take his seat in that body, his name is omitted-from the honorable roll of those early days. Mr. Canfield was a friend of Benjamin Franklin, with whom was held many earnest consultations, the “tax on tea” being at one time a subject of special in- terest. His wife, Dorcas Buell, was the only daughter of Solomon Buell, eighth son of John Buell, and grandson of William Buell, who came from England in 1643. Their children, eight in number, were Laura, wife of Ambrose Spencer; Annis, wife of Andrew Adams, Jr., son of Chief Justice Adams, of Litchfield; Eunice, wife of Samuel Rockwell, M.D.; Avis, who died aged thirteen years; Alma, wife of Hon. Elisha Sterling; Almira, wife of Gen. Elisha Buel; John Montgomery, married Fanny Harvey ; Isabella, wife of Ansel Sterling. Judge Sterling was a man of unimpeachable in- tegrity, “of diversified talent. As a lawyer his fo- rensic ability was of a high order, nor was he deficient in legal science. His language flowed rapidly, and at times his appeals to the jury were very effective.” Judge Church, of the Supreme Court, thus writes of him: “This distinguished gentleman was long an active and prominent member of the bar of Litchfield County, fur many sessions an influential member of the General Assembly of the State of Connecticut, a circuit judge of the County Court, a member of Congress for two sessions, and an estimable mun iu all the relations of social aud domestic life.” Judge Sterling died Nov. 6, 1858, aged seventy-one. His wife died July 26, 1855, aged seventy-four. Their children, eight in number, are Laura Spencer; George Augustine, who graduated at West Point, served for a time in the United States army stationed at Fort Gibson, in the then Territory of Arkansas, resigned and entered the ministry of the Episcopal Church. He died at Sharon, Oct. 17, 1869. He married Flora J. Chamberlain. Their children were Mary Isabella, wife of Walter M. Patterson, Esq,, who died Feb. 18, 1864; George Ansel, M.D., married Mary P. Havens. Ambrose Spencer, second son of Ansel Sterling, died July 1, 1880. His wife, Louisa M. Clarke. 25 Their children were Louisa M., wife of L. H. Stewart; Pierre Clarke; George Edward. Charles Ansel, third son, married Augusta A. Shel- ton. Two children: Charles Frederick, M.D., wife, Mary C. Anthony ; Isabella Canfield, wife of William C. Atwater. Isabella Dorcas, married Rev. George Ryerson; one son, George Ansel Sterling Ryerson, M.D. Thomas Sterling, fourth son, married Louisa T. Winchell, deceased. Avis Canfield, married Frederick 8. Bogue. Rey. John Canfield, fifth son, was graduated at Trinity College, Connecticut, a clergyman of the Episcopal Church; died at Hartford, Conn., Dec. 10, 1874. He married Caroline Sargent Upson. Their children are Caroline, Isabella, Alice, Clarance Can- field. For notices of Ephraim Kirby, Uriel Holmes, E. C. Bacon, Francis Bacon, and John Bird, see Litch- field history; and for John and Judson Canfield, see history of Sharon. “STEPHEN Tirus HosMER was a lawyer of eminence in his peculiar way. He had no very high standing as an advocate, but, as a lawyer learned in elementary principles, his position was a very good one. A gen- tleman who had heard him told me that his manner was hard and dry and his elocution very defective, but in some branches of legal science he had few superiors. He seemed to delight in exploring an- cient paths in search of legal principles, and in get- ting up old legal tracts and dissertations. In the first volume of Day’s Reports there is a note of forty pages of fine print containing an opinion of Lord Camden, of the English Court of Common Pleas, which has hardly a rival in judicial learning or eloquence. Mr. Day informed me that this was presented to him in manuscript by Mr. Hosmer, there being then no printed copy of it on this side of the Atlantic. He was appointed a judge of the old court in 1815, but, being one of the younger judges, it never fell to his lot to preside on the trial of a case until his accession to the chief justiceship. His career on the whole was very successful, both at nisi prius and on the bench of the Supreme Court. His apprehension of the points involved in the case before him was very quick, and the first intimation he gave on incidental matters occurring in the course of the trial was a sure indication of what the result would be, and, although he would take special pains to say to the counsel that he had formed no opinion, the party against whom he leaned knew that his fate was sealed. His labors in his official duties must have been immense. It fell to his lot to give the opinion of the court in nearly all the cases tried in the Supreme Court for several years after his appointment, and nearly all the ma- terial of the third, fourth, and fifth large volumes of the Connecticut Reports are the result of his study of the cases before the court, and some of them are very learned and labored. His illustrations in the 26 case of Mitchell vs. Warner, in the second of Connec- ticut Reports, of the extent of the obligations incurred in the covenants of a deed, explained the subject to me when I was young better than anything I had before read on the subject. “Tt seemed to be his object to render himself as agreeable as possible to the members of the bar, sometimes employing his leisure moments on the bench in furnishing prescriptions for human ail- ments, such as corns on the toes, and handing them over to such members as stood in need of them. Then he would hand over a formula for making, as he said, the best kind of liquid blacking for our boots. In fact, everything which he had prescribed he always designated as the very best. At one term of the court, Phineas Miner, Esq., who had lived a widower for several years, was about being married, which fact was intimated to the judge. While he ‘sat waiting on the bench for the preparation of some business, he spoke out suddenly : “Gentlemen, is there a vacant cell in your jail? Won’t it be necessary for me to commit Mr. Miner to prevent his doing some rash act?” The laugh was thoroughly turned upon poor Miner, and the whole scene was very enjoyable. He employed all his leisure hours in obtaining all the relaxation which was within his reach. He played on the piano and violin, and sang with great power and effect. “There was no perceptible waning of his powers, physical or mental, during the time of his service on the court. He retired from the bench at the age of seventy years, in February, 1838, and died, after a short illness, in less than two years thereafter.” “JoHN THompson PETERS was the senior asso- ciate judge of the court, and he held his first circuit in this county. He was a native of Hebron, and a lawyer of respectable standing. His fellow-citizens had often honored him with a seat in the Legislature, and thus he had become tolerably well known in the State. When the United States direct tax was laid, in 1814, he was appointed collector for the First Dis- trict, removed to Hartford, and held that office when he wasappointed judge. Hehad been one of the leaders of the Democratic party from its formation, and as an Episcopalian had opposed the claims of the ‘Standing Order’ to ecclesiastical priority, and some apprehen- sions were felt lest his well-known views on these subjects might temper his opinions on those questions incidentally involving them. Many fears were en- tertained as to the stability of ecclesiastical funds which existed in almost every Congregational parish, and those who desired to break them down looked to Judge Peters and to his influence with the court to aid them. But those who entertained such hopes were destined to an early disappointment, as their past experience of his administration on such ques- tions showed him to be disposed to stand firmly on the old paths. He used to tell an amusing anecdote relating to his first trial of such a case in one of the HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. eastern counties of the State, where he was appealed to very strongly to decide that a promise to pay money in aid of such funds was without consideration. But he told the parties that the law on that subject was well settled, and, in his opinion, founded on correct principles, and that if he had the power he had not the disposition to change it. It had been the practice of the Congregational pastor of the village to open the proceedings in court with prayer, but, considering Peters to be a heretic (I use the judge’s own lan- guage), he had never invited Divine favor for him, but after that decision every prayer was charged with invocations of blessings upon ‘ thy sarvant, the judge’ “ He was very severe in meting out the punishments of the law to convicted criminals, generally inflicting the severest sentence that the law would allow. One case was tried before him which excited much remark and some reprehension. A man had been convicted before Judge Lanman of a State-prison offense; had been sentenced to four years’ imprisonment, and had serveda part of ayear, when he obtained anewtrial. He was tried again, before Judge Peters, and again con- victed. When the time came to pass sentence on the last conviction, his counsel asked for some mitigation on account of the imprisonment already suffered. Said the judge, ‘He must settle that account with Judge Lanman. He owes me five years’ imprison- ment in State prison,’ and such was the sentence. One prisoner who had received a severe sentence at his hands after the expiration of his confinement burned the judge’s barn, and he petitioned the Leg- islature of the State to pay for it in 1831, but they declined to make the compensation. “For a few years the services of Judge Peters on the bench were very acceptable. His decisions were prompt and generally founded on a sensible view of the matter before him, without any affectation of learning or a display of oratory. His entire candor and fairness were never called in question, and the de- cay of his powers, which was very apparent towards the close of his career, was observed by the bar with sor- row and regret. I witnessed an affecting scene con- nected with his experience on the bench which excited a deep feeling of sympathy. He had a favorite son, Hugh Peters, Esq., whom he had educated at Yale College, and in whom all his hopes seemed to centre. This young man, in connection with George D. Pren- tice, the noted editor, had much to do in conducting the New England Weekly Review, a paper just estab- lished in Hartford, and which was the organ of the party which elected William W. Ellsworth, Jabez W. Huntington, and William L. Storrs to Congress. He had acquired a wide reputation as a writer of brilliant promise, and after a while went to Cincin- nati to go into business as a lawyer. On his way across Long Island Sound he wrote a farewell to New England in poetry, which was published with great commendation in most of the newspapers in the country. Soon after his arrival at Cincinnati his BENCH AND BAR. 27 dead body was found floating in the Ohio, several miles below the city, and circumstances were such as to create the belief in some minds that it was a case of suicide. The intelligence of this sad event was brought to Litchfield while the Court of Errors was in session, in June, 1831. It was first communicated to Judge Williams, who sat next to Judge Peters, and he, with all possible tenderness, informed the latter. The reporter, Mr. Day, in giving the report of the case on trial, closes it by saying, ‘Peters, Judge, having received, during the argument of this case, intelligence of the death of his son, Hugh Peters, Esq., of Cincinnati, left the court-house, ‘“multa gemens casuque animum coneussus,’ and gave no opinion.’ I witnessed the mournful scene, and I well remember the loud and plaintive groans of ‘the afflicted old man as he passed out of the court-room and down the stairway to his lodgings. “When Chief Justice Hosmer retired from the bench, the Legislature, by a very strong vote, elected Judge Peters’ junior, Judge Daggett, chief justice. -He felt the slight, but did not retire, and held his place till his death, in August, 1834. A few weeks longer and he would have reached the age of seventy years. “ Asa CHAPMAN.—The next judge in seniority was Asa Chapman, of Newtown, in Fairfield County. For several years before he received the appointment he practiced to some extent in this county, and was, of course, well known here. He was the father of the late _ Charles Chapman, of Hartford. He was somewhat taller than the son, and, with his bald head, white locks, thin face, and gray eyes, he resembled him not a little in personal appearance, but he had none of that bitterness of manner or spirit which characterized the efforts of the younger Chapman. He was an Epis- copalian in religious faith, and he had very naturally fallen into the ranks of the new party, and, being well qualified for the place in point of legal ability, he made a very acceptable and popular judge. He was a man of good humor, genial temper, and great colloquial powers, which he exercised very freely on the trial of cases. If a lawyer undertook to argue a case before him, he soon found himself engaged in a friendly, familiar conversation with the judge, the evident intent of the latter being to draw out the truth and justice of the case. His administration was very popular, and his early death was greatly deplored. He died of consumption, in 1826, at the age of fifty-six years. “ JEREMIAH GATES BRAINARD, of New London, the father of the poet Brainard, was next in seniority on the bench. He had been a member of the old court from 1807, and he was elected to the new court under the circumstances which I have mentioned. He was a man of no showy pretensions, very plain and simple in his manners, and very familiar in his intercourse with the bar. He affected very little dig- nity on the bench, and yet he was regarded as an ex- cellent judge. He despatched business with great facility, and implicit confidence was placed in his sound judgment and integrity. He resigned his place on the bench in 1829, his health not being equal to the duties of the office, having served as judge for twenty-two years. “WILLIAM BristoL.—Of all the judges on the bench, William Bristol, of New Haven, was the youngest in years as well as in rank. He had not been much known as a lawyer out of the county of New Haven, and, of course, his coming here was looked for with considerable interest. He evidently had a high sense of judicial dignity, his manners on the bench being very taciturn, approaching severe- ness, very seldom speaking except to announce his decisions in the fewest -possible words, and I doubt if any one ever saw him smile in conrt. His decisions were sound and well considered, and upon the whole his administration was respectable, although he could not be said to have had much personal popularity with the bar. “Davip DaccEeTt.—The decease of Judge Chap- man and the resignation of Judge Bristol in 1826 created two vacancies in the court which were to be filled at the session of the Legislature of that year. The same party which had effected the change in the government of the State and in the constitution of the court was still in power, but nearly all the eminent lawyers in the State adhered to the Federal party. Probably the most obnoxious man in the State to the dominant party was David Daggett, not so much from personal dislike as from his prominence in the ranks of his party. His talents, integrity, and high legal abilities were conceded by every one, but when the Legislature assembled there was probably not a man in the State who looked to his election as a judge. “There were a few men in the State belonging to the toleration party who felt deeply the importance of having a reputable court, and who, on this ques- tion, were willing to forego all party considerations. Morris Woodruff, of Litchfield County, Thaddeus Betts and Charles Hawley, of Fairfield County, Wal- ter Booth, of New Haven County, and Charles J. Mc- Curdy, of New London County, were men of that stamp; and it was through the influence of these men, and of others of less prominence, that David Daggett was elected a judge of the Supreme Court. The same influences, exerted by the same men, se- cured the election of Judges Williams and Bissell, three years later. “ After the election of Judge Daggett was effected no one seemed to care who the other judge might be, as with Chief Justice Hosmer at the head of the court, and Judge Daggett as an associate, it was felt that it could have a highly respectable character. The Hon. James Lanman received the appointment, but after a short term of service resigned. “Joun WeELcH.—The junior judge of the court 28 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. was the Hon. John Welch, of Litchfield. He was a native of the parish of Milton and a graduate of Yale College in the class of 1778,—a class which is said to have produced more eminent men in proportion to its numbers than any other which ever graduated at that institution. Joel Barlow, Zephaniah Swift, Uriah Tracy, Noah Webster, and the last Governor Wolcott, with many other distinguished men, were of the class. “Judge Welch never entered either of the profes- sions, but he lived to a very great age. He was ap- pointed a judge of the County Court in the place of Cyrus Swan, Esq., of Sharon, who had resigned his position on the bench of the court in 1819. Judge Welch continued on the bench till he became dis- qualified by age in 1829. He made no pretensions to legal learning, but his decisions were based on a fair, impartial view of the questions as they came up. He always gave reasons for the opinion he had formed, always made himself well understood, and his candor, fairness, and sound judgment were admitted by all. “JuDGES BURRALL, WOODRUFF, AND Boarp- MAN.—In 1829, when Judge Welch must retire on account of his age, it was deemed proper by the Legis- lature to make new appointments of both associate judges. Judge Strong had been twelve years on the bench, and in his place William M. Burrall, Esq., of Canaan, was appointed senior associate judge, and Gen. Morris Woodruff took the place of Judge Welch. The court continued thus organized till the resigna- tion of Judge Pettibone, when, not only with the consent, but with the decided approval, of both asso- ciate judges, David 8. Boardman, Esq., of New Mil- ford, was taken from the bar and installed chief judge of the County Court, which as then constituted held a high position in public confidence. “ JABEZ SwIFt was the first lawyer who settled in Salisbury. He was a native of Kent, and upon the breaking out of the war of the Revolution he joined the army in Boston, and there died. “ ADONIJAH STRONG was a pupil of Mr. Swift, and succeeded him in practice. Col. Strong was a man of vigorous mind, had a large practice, but possessed none of the graces of eloquence. For many years he was an efficient magistrate, and a member of the Gen- eral Assembly. He died in February, 1818. “JOSEPH CANFIELD, EsqQ., commenced his profes- sional studies with Col. Strong, and finished them at the Litchfield Law School. He commenced his prac- tice at. Furnace Village, in Salisbury, about the year 1789. Mr. Canfield was a gentleman of graceful manners and good talents; he died in September, 1803, having been several times a member of the As- sembly. “Martin Strong, of Salisbury, son of Col. Adon- ijah Strong, of that town, was a lawyer of the olden time, of whose wit, as well as blunders, many stories were rife fifty years ago. Col. Strong had four sons, all of whom entered into professional life——two as clergymen, and two as lawyers. His son, the Rey, William Strong, was father of the Hou. William Strong, of Pennsylvania, now one of the associate justices of the United States Supreme Court. Judge Martin Strong had been a member of the bar for sey- eral years, but had never made a very high mark in his profession; in fact, he had never devoted himself assiduously to the discharge of its duties. He owned a very large and valuable farm on the town hill in Salisbury, and his principal business was to attend to that. When he came upon the bench he seemed to have a recollection of a few plain legal maxims, but his method of applying them to cases was not always the most skillful. He was a man of immense physi- cal dimensions, and when he had taken his seat on the bench he sat in perfect quiet until the loud proc- lamation of the sheriff annougced the adjournment of the court. He remained in office till 1829, when William M. Burrall, Esq., of Canaan, took his place. “Asa BACON was a native of Canterbury, and came to Litchfield as early as 1806, after a short period of practice at East Haddam, and for a while was a part- ner of Judge Gould. In 1820 he had become a leading spirit at the bar. He had a fine personal appearance, being tall and well proportioned, and usually richly dressed. The first time I saw him before the jury his head was well cased in powder and pomatum, anda long queue was dangling at his back; but he soon laid aside this conformity to old-time fashions, although he was the last member of the bar to do so. He was undoubtedly a very hard student, and his briefs were the result of extensive and faithful study. He was not a very fluent, but was after all an interesting, speaker. He would sometimes interlude his argu- ments with specimens of drollery and flashes of wit, and the expectation that these would be put forth se- cured a very strict attention from all his hearers. He frequently quoted passages of Scripture and com- mented upon them, not always irreverently, but some- times with rather unbecoming levity. He was a mortal enemy of universal suffrage, and once in commenting upon the parable of the talents he called the bailee of one talent who had hid it in the earth a universal suffrage man. He was a genial, jolly, companionable man, and, although not addicted to excessive liberality in his benefactions, still kept himself in good standing while he remained here. When he had reached the age of sixty years he was appointed president of the branch of the Phenix Bank, located in Litchfield, and after that was never seen professionally engaged in court. The last years of his life were spent in New Haven, where he died at a very advanced age. “GEN. ELISHA STERLING was a native of Lyme and a graduate of Yale College in the class of 1787. He studied law with the Hon. John Canfield, of Sharon, who was his father-in-law, and settled in Salisbury in 1791. He was a man of a high order of talent, and had he addressed himself solely to professional points would probably have stood at the head of the bar in BENCH AND BAR. 29 this county. But he loved money and gave much of his time to different kinds of business, and acquired. great wealth for those times. Notwithstanding this propensity he had an extensive practice and was en- gaged in most of the cases coming from the northern portions of the county. He was a ready speaker, not very select in the choice of his words, and not elo- quent by any established rule of elocution, but there was a kind of impetuosity in his manner, accompanied by a rapid but distinct utterance of language, which gave him popularity as an advocate. He was ap- pointed State’s attorney in 1814, and held the office six years, when Seth P. Beers, Esq., was appointed in his place. He retired from practice soon after, and died in 1886, at the age of seventy-two years. His wealth enabled him to indulge the strong taste he had for a handsome style of living and equipage, and in that direction his mind had strong aristocratical tend- encies. “Davip 8S. BOARDMAN was a native of New Mil- ford, and settled there in the practice of law after his admission to the bar, in 1795. He was a man of re- tiring disposition, in no way giving showy display of his powers, but he was a finished legal scholar, and was deemed a very safe and prudent. professional ad- viser. He had a very nice literary taste, and the least grammatical blunder by a judge or lawyer at- tracted his attention and frequently his ridicule. His arguments were pointed specimens of perspicuity, precision, and force, but he failed to attract much at- tention as an advocate through a defect of vocal power. His voice was feeble and could scarcely be heard except by those who were near him. He had a high character for moral rectitude, and his four or five years’ service at the head of the County Court gave it a dignity and moral power which in other years it had scarcely obtained. Sketches from his pen descriptive of some of the members of the bar in this county of the last century may be found in the beginning of this chapter. He was a college classmate of Asa Bacon, and they were warm personal friends. He lived to the great age of ninety-seven years. “ PHINEHAS MINER, the last, because the youngest, of the class of lawyers to whom I have referred, de- serves a much more extended notice than I shall be able to give him. His amiable and genial temper as aman seemed to make him very popular as a lawyer. Fidelity to his clients and a laborious attention to their interests was a marked trait in his professional career. He commenced practice in Winchester, his native town, and had there acquired a good standing in his profession, when he came to Litchfield in 1816. He had an extensive practice and was noted for the dili- gence with which he pressed every point, however unimportant, which could be made to tell in favor of his client. His arguments were generally extended to a great length, and I have known him to receive a gentle hint fromthe judge recommending a condensa- 3 tion of his thoughts. He died in 1889, at the age of sixty years, and Mr. Day, the reporter, gives a flatter- ing estimate of him in a foot-note on 134th page of the 13th volume of Connecticut Reports. “ WILLIAM G, WILLIAMS, of New Hartford, stood as high as any member of this class, He belonged to the eminent and reputable Williams family, of Massa- chusetts, his father being a nephew of Col. Ephraim Williams, the founder of Williams College, and him- self the first cousin of Bishop Williams, of the Epis- copal Church of Connecticut. As a special pleader he had no superior at the bar. He had a tolerably fair standing as an advocate, and was indefatigable in pursuing to the last possible effort any purpose he had undertaken. If he failed in one form of action he would try another, and never gave up till further per- sistence was hopeless. He commenced business as a lawyer in Sharon, where he married, but after a few years he removed to New Hartford, where he re- mained during his life. He had scarcely reached the age of sixty years when he died. “ JoHN Strong, JR., of Woodbury, his native town, was a lawyer of very fair standing. I remember once to have heard Judge Boardman say ‘that if he found John Strong differing from himself on a law point, he always doubted the correctness of his own conclusions.’ He was a ready speaker and had a peculiar habit of looking all over the hall, frequently directly behind himself, while he was addressing the jury. His argu- ments were clear and logical, and he was always lis- tened to by the court with attention. He had scarcely reached the age of fifty years when he died. “CALVIN BuTLER, of Plymouth, had a very good reputation as a lawyer. He also stood well with his fellow-citizens of Plymouth, as he was often a mem- ber of the Legislature, and he was of the convention of this State. He was also a member of the Senate in 1882. He had a part in all cases which came from that town and managed a trial very well. He was earnest in his manner of addressing the jury, and he was in full practice up to the time of his death, when he had reached the age of seventy-two years. He died suddenly while away from home, and left behind a good record as a faithful lawyer and an honest man. “Cyrus Swan, of Stonington, came to the bar of this county in 1798. He settled in Sharon, and con- tinued in full practice for twenty years. He was ap- pointed a judge of the County Court in 1818, and reap- pointed for the succeeding year, but resigned the of- fice before the close of the term. His health becom- ing intolerant of sedentary habits and requiring out- door pursuits, he never resumed full practice, although he occasionally appeared in trials where his old friends demanded his aid. His arguments were clear, sound, and sensible, and were listened to with attention. His mind was well stored with sound legal maxims, and his aim seemed to be to make a sensible applica- tion of these to the case in hand. He died in 1835, at the age of sixty-five years. 30 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. “JosEPH MILLER, of Winsted, who died recently in Michigan at a very advanced age, was a man of moral talent and of a higher order of legal acquire- ments than he usually had credit for. After the re- moyal of Mr. Miller to Litchfield his practice was large, and continued to be so for several years. His arguments were short, compact, and logical, and were listened to with attention and interest. In middle life he removed to Michigan, where he had a pros- perous career. “WILLIAM M. BURRALL, a native, and through life a resident, of Canaan, was a lawyer of very ex- tensive practice in one branch of business. He com- menced a great many cases to the court, but never argued one on the final trial. argue motions for continuance or for other purposes, and his success on such occasions showed that he had underrated his own powers. Although he did not argue his cases, he was the master-spirit in managing all the details of the trial, in what order witnesses should be called, and the points of testimony brought out. His associates depended greatly on his skill in conducting this part of the proceedings. He had a kind, affable, and winning way in his social inter- course, and his offices were employed in adjusting and settling legal controversies. He acted as committee and arbitrator in more cases than any other member of the bar of his time, and if a desire to make him- self as indifferent as possible to all parties sometimes seemed to hold him back from decisive action, he always, in the end, showed true firmness and integrity. He was an associate judge of the County Court from 1829 to 1836, and after that chief judge for ten years. He died at the age of seventy-seven years. “Cot. WILLIAM COGGSWELL, of New Preston, a very worthy and respectable gentleman, was a mem- ber of the bar, and was very seldom absent from the courts. He never engaged in the trial of a case, and very seldom spoke to the bench, but he was always a busy man in the court-room. He was one cf the electors who cast the vote of Connecticut for John Quincy Adams for President in 1824. He died before he had reached a very advanced age. “SrtH P. BEERS.—When I came to the bar, in 1820, Seth P. Beers, Esq., was in full practice. He was appointed State’s attorney soon after, but re- signed in three years, having been appointed commis- sioner of the school fund, which office he held for twenty-five years. I have heard him say that at some terms of the court he had commenced as many as one hundred and fifty cases, and he was very thorough in all matters committed to his trust. His talents as an advocate were respectable, his briefs being very full and his knowledge of every minute point being very complete. “Perry SMITH, of New Milford, held a somewhat prominent place at the bar, and his practice was ex- tensive. So many different estimates have been made of Mr. Smith’s real qualities that it is difficult to He would sometimes - speak of him with any very strong assurance of cor- rectness. That he had talents and friends the success which he achieved both as a lawyer and a politician renders certain, but those who remember the time of his professional experience here know that he had enemies, and such would be the natural result of the unrelenting bitterness with which he pursued his ad- versaries in his efforts before the courts. There wasa bitterness in his invectives, a persistence in his perse- cutions, an implacability in his enmities, which gave a decided character to his professional career, and which insured to him the enmity of all against whom his efforts were directed. He was always listened to with a kind of inquisitiveness as to what new fountain of bitterness he would open, or what new invectives he would invent to pour out upon his adversary. These were sometimes directed against the opposing counsel as well as the opposing party, and upon the whole he incurred a great amount of hatred. I am only speaking of what occurred in court, and express- ing the opinion which we would form in witnessing his professional conflicts. It cannot be doubted that he had many friends and supporters outside of this scene of action, and it is not unlikely that he was as warm and constant in his friendships as he was bitter and unrelenting in his hatreds. After his election to the United States Senate he retired from the bar and was very seldom seen here. “RocER MIxts, of New Hartford, was at one time a partner with Mr. Williams, of whom we have already spoken, from whom he differed in every re- spect except that both held the position of honorable and worthy gentlemen. Mr. Mills was slow in his conception of thoughts, slow in all the movements of his mind, and very slow in the delivery of his argu- ments, and yet when all his duties in a case were ac- complished it would be seen that he had made a cred- itable effort, and that he was far from being a lawyer of indifferent pretensions. His son of the same name succeeded him in the practice of law at New Hart- ford, but has since removed to Wisconsin, where he has had a successful career. Micuart F. Minus was born in Norfolk, March 22,1776. He was the youngest of a family of nine children, all of whom attained advanced age except one brother, who died in early life. Mr. Mills sur- vived all of them and most of his early friends, and at the time of his death, with one exception, the late Deacon Amos Pettibone, was the only male first de- scendant of the original landed proprietors of Nor- folk, The other members of the family were born in the town of Simsbury, Hartford Co., from whence Mr. Mills’ parents as well as many others of the first settlers of Norfolk emigrated. Mr. Mills, never having lived out of his native town and never having held any high public station, may not have been as publicly kuown out of his own town and county as many other men less gifted, but so far as his townsmen could testify their respect and cou- Y At F GO) ke BENCH AND BAR. fidence in him they did so by elevating him to every place of trust and responsibility within their gift. He represented his town in several sessions of the Legis- lature, was appointed judge of probate in 1822, and held the office twenty years; in 1812 was appointed justice of the peace and officiated in that capacity until he was seventy years of age. He was the first postmaster at Norfolk, appointed by Thomas Jeffer- son in 1804. At that time the mail only arrived twice a week in Norfolk, and only two papers were received at the office,—the Connecticut Courant and Litchfield Monitor. Mr. Mills never figured conspicuously as an advo- cate in the higher courts, but was regarded by the ablest lawyers as one of the best men in the State to prepare a case. Most people know how very liable members of the legal profession are to make enemies in discharging the duties of their calling, but in this Mr. Mills was peculiarly fortunate. Being of a happy and generous disposition, whatever he said or did never partook of ill-will or malignity. Mr. Mills died Aug. 2, 1857, and a friend, in speak- ing of the departed, says, “As might be expected, the funeral obsequies of the deceased were solemn and impressive to his friends and neighbors and particu- larly to the aged inhabitants of the town. The funeral discourse was delivered by Rev. Joseph Eldridge. We have attended a great many funerals, but seldom one where we have seen so large a number of mourning relatives, a circumstance that goes to show the antiquity of the family in the town.” Mr. Mills was interred in the old burying-ground, where his remains rest amidst departed kindred and friends. Gen. Charles F. Sedgwick, in speaking of Mr. Mills, says, “He never attempted to argue cases in the higher courts, but on the trial of motions as they came before the courts he was very prominent. We all thought well of ‘Uncle Mich,’ as we used to call him, and so did the people of Norfolk, for he was always a promi- nent man in the affairs of the town. He was a mem- ber of the Legislature in 1830 and 1831.” Two daughters of Mr. Mills survive,—Mrs. John A. Shepard and Mrs. John K. Shepard. “EDWARD AIKEN resided in Norfolk, and gained some prominence at the bar. “CHARLES B, PHELPS settled in Woodbury soon after his admission to the bar, nearly sixty years ago. He continued in practice while he lived. He died suddenly from a disease of the heart, at the age of seventy-two years. He held a respectable position as a lawyer, and for two years was a judge of the County Court while that court was holden by a single judge. All who knew him have a very pleasant memory of his genial humor, pertinent anecdotes, and witty and pungent sayings. The younger members of the bar were delighted with his company, and all deeply de- plored his sudden death. “MatTHEW Minor, of Woodbury, was a lawyer of good classical education and respectable legal at- 31 tainments. He had a native diffidence which pre- vented him putting himself forward very often on the trial of cases, but when his powers were brought out he made a respectable show. He belonged to one of the eminent families of Woodbury, and for personal qualities was very much respected. “NATHANIEL P. PERRY, of Kent, was a quiet, un- obtrusive, conscientious man. He was the only law- yer in that town during the greater part of his profes- sional life, and did a good local business. He was very diligent in the pursuit of his profession, and gen- erally argued the cases that he commenced. He was a member of the Senate for two successive years, and died at the age of about sixty years.” Hoxusroox Curtis, lawyer, of the class of 1807, died at Watertown, Conn., Feb. 21, 1858, of apoplexy. The deceased was born at Newtown, Fairfield Co., July 14, 1787. When eleven years of age he was placed by his parents in the family of the Rev. Dr. Burhans to be prepared for college. Remaining with him two or three years, he subsequently pursued his studies with that accomplished jurist and classical scholar, Judge Chapman, from whom: he imbibed a taste for the classics, which he cultivated and enjoyed through life. He entered the junior class of Yale College in 1805, and on graduating returned to his native town, studied law with Judge Chapman, and was admitted to the bar, at Fairfield, in 1809. He pursued the practice of his profession at New- town until 1818, when upon the death of Samuel W. Southmayd, Esq., a lawyer, at Watertown, Litchfield Co., Conn., he was invited by several gentlemen of that place to remove there. The invitation was ac- cepted and he remained there until his death. During almost fifty years of professional life he received the confidence and esteem of those around him, and his good sense and kindness of heart were very frequently enlisted to make peace and heal dissensions among neighbors and friends. He pursued an honorable, highminded, liberal course in the performance of his duties as a lawyer, as a citizen, and asaman. In the various public trusts he was called upon during periods of many years to discharge, as a magistrate, member of the Legislature, judge of probate and of the county, and member of the general conventions of the Epis- copal Church, in which he was educated and through life attached, his sound judgment, strict integrity,.and conservative views were pre-eminent. He was a man of constant and extensive reading, had made some progress in modern languages, and of the Latin poets could repeat large portions of Horace and Virgil from memory. He was warm and social in his feelings and possessed an immense fund of ancedote, not only of the bench and bar of his early days, but the traditional, extending back into the colonial tinres; and even the unpublished stanzas with which the legal wits honored the king’s attorney in the days of the Stamp Act, or the ancient clergy occasionally prepared in commemoration of some 32 ludicrous mishap of one of their number, were stored away in his retentive memory. The men of those times have long since passed away, and he has been called to follow them, regretted by all who knew him. “Jam te premet nox, fabuleque Manes, Et domus exilis Plutonia.” WILLIAM EpMonpD CurRTIS was the eldest son of Holbrook and Elizabeth (Edmond) Curtis, and was born at Watertown, in the same room in which he died, Sept. 29, 1823. A sketch of his father appears elsewhere in this work. His maternal grandfather, Judge William Edmond, of Newtown, Conn., was of Irish descent, but was born in this State, graduated at Yale College in 1773, served as a volunteer, and was wounded in the attack on Danbury in 1777; married, for his second wife, a daughter of Benjamin Payne, Esq., of Hartford; was a member of Congress and a judge of the Supreme Court of this State. Young Curtis had a brother Henry, near his own age, and the two boys grew up together, studying partly at the schools of the town and partly with their father until about twelve years of age, when Henry died, leaving William the only child of his parents. He had begun the study of Latin with his father at the age of eight, and pursued his classical studies under his guidance until he was fifteen, when he went for a year to the Episcopal academy at Cheshire, then under the care of the Rev. Allen C. Morgan and the Rey. Dr. Beardsley, where he finished his preparation for college, and entered Trinity College, Hartford, the ensuing year. He graduated with distinguished honor in 1848, and entered the law-office of Hon. William Curtis Noyes, then a prominent member of the New York bar. He undertook, in addition to his legal studies, the acquisition of a more thorough knowledge of the French and Spanish languages, and with such success that by the time he was admitted to the bar he was able to speak both languages with sufficient facility for business purposes, and immediately reaped the benefit of his labors by attracting French and Span- ish clients, and thus early laying the foundation of an extensive and successful practice. It is worth while to notice, however, for the encour- agement of younger members of the profession, this entry in his diary : “June 26, 1846. Nothing to do; business dull. ter, I shall emigrate to Texas,” This probably does not indicate any intention of going to Texas, but was a figurative expression of the time, indicating merely the intention of making some change of location for the purpose of bettering his fortunes. Soon after his proposed emigration to Texas busi- ness prospects began to improve, and from that time forward he never lacked professional occupation. He was not only a careful student of the law, but he was a man of excellent business judgment, so that his If things are not bet- HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. advice was much sought and greatly valued. Faith- fulness to duty was a marked feature of his character, He prepared his cases with care and fidelity, giving careful thought to every consideration by which his clients’ interest might be affected. As a consequence of this he won many causes without a trial. He was fair and honest by nature, and people instinctively confided in him in regard to their property interests and their personal affairs. His courtesy was remark- able, and it was only when occasion seemed to demand it that he assumed a tone of severity with the air of dis- charging a duty rather than of giving way to the in- dulgence of personal feeling. His whole demeanor was eminently dignified and judicial, and when, in 1871, he was elected on the Reform ticket one of the judges of the Superior Court of the City of New York, there was a very general feeling that he was in his right place. His career on the bench fully justi- fied this feeling, and on the death of Chief Justice Monell, in 1876, he was with great unanimity selected as presiding judge. One of his late associates, in speaking of his char- acter at a meeting of the bar held with reference to his death, said, ‘‘ He seemed to have an intuitive idea of right and justice from which he never swerved. He was asafe guardian of every interest committed to his management, and allowed no selfish purpose to swerve him from entire justice to others. This sentiment was carried in instances to self-sacrifice. He was a large-minded man, and the current of his thoughts and actions was limited by no narrow bounds; it deepened and widened according to the subjects he was called upon to consider.” Perhaps the highest praise that can be given to a judge is that he has no history but the reports. Outside of his profession Judge Curtis’ chief efforts were in the cause of education. To Trinity College, as his Alma Mater, his ties were strong and his rela- tions intimate. In 1846 he was appointed to deliver the Master’s oration. In 1857 he became a Fellow of the college and a member of the corporation, and in 1862 he received the honorary degree of LL.D. In 1857 he was elected a member of the board of education of the city of New York, and served in that capacity for nine years and, dusing the last four years, as president of the hosed, He was a vestry- man of St. George’s Church, a member of the council of the New York Geographical Society, and of various other religious, literary, and social organizations. All these duties he discharged with conscientious fidelity, and especially to those connected with the board of education he devoted a large amount of time. His personal friendships, though not demonstrative, were lasting, and an old friend or acquaintance in need never appealed to him in vain. Many could testify to this, but he was naturally secretive, and probably few comparatively of these acts of kindness were ever known beyond himself and the recipient. BENCH AND BAR. 33 His local attachments were very strong. He always retained the old place in Watertown which he had inherited from his father, where he himself was born, and which had always been his home. Here his family spent their summers, and here he came to rest when rest was permitted, thoroughly enjoying the scenes of his childhood and the familiar faces and voices that greeted each return. He was deeply at- tached to the place and greatly respected and esteemed by the people. “ We have lost our great man,’’ was the simple tribute paid to him by one of his towns- men. The character of his mind was in all things strongly conservative, and although he kept pace with the time in knowledge and habit of life, yet to him personally change was painful, and he endured rather than en- joyed the little that circumstances compelled him to adopt of what was new in all his personal belongings. In his youth he was tall, slender, and delicate, and although in later years he became a large man, and had the appearance of physical vigor, he was not as strong as he appeared. Nearly two years before his death he had a severe sickness which prostrated him for many weeks. The following summer he spent in Europe and partially regained his health; but the severe work of a long winter was too great a tax upon his enfeebled vitality, and on the 6th day of July, 1880, at his old home, and surrounded by his family, he suddenly sank under what appeared to be buta slight indisposition. Judge Curtis married, Sept. 2, 1851, Mary A., daughter of William H. Scovell, Esq., of Waterbury, and great-granddaughter of the Rev. James Scovill, a native of Watertown, and the first Episcopal min- ister of Watertown and Waterbury. His widow, with five sons and two daughters, survive him. “Tsaac LEAVENWORTH AND RoyaL R. HINMAN. —There were two lawyers in Roxbury fifty years ago, Isaac Leavenworth and Royal R. Hinman, who made a considerable show of business before the courts, but who retired from practice in the course of a few years. Mr. Leavenworth went into other business in New Haven, where it is said he has been very successful, and is still living at a very advanced age. Mr. Hin- man held the office of Secretary of State for eight years, and published several pamphlets containing the statistics of many of the most prominent families in the State. ; “JosrPpH H. Betuamy, of Bethlehem, deserves more than a passing tribute. He was a grandson of the celebrated divine of that name, and was a man of great moral worth. He never had a very extensive practice as a lawyer, but was much employed in va- rious branches of public business. He was frequently a member of the Legislature, and once represented the Sixteenth District in the Senate.’ He died in middle life, and all, of all names and parties, pay him the tribute of an affectionate and respectful remembrance. “THEODORE Nortu, of Goshen, his native town, removed to Chenango Co., N. Y., about 1823. He graduated at Williams College in 1806 with the high- est honors of his class. He was a remarkably well- read lawyer, and had a respectable standing as an advocate. He attained to eminence in his profession in the State of New York. He died some twenty years since. “Hon. WILLIAMS. HOLABIRD, a native of Canaan, Conn., studied law with Hon. W.M. Burrall, attended the law lectures of Judge Gould at Litchfield, was admitted to the bar about 1820, and soon after commenced practice at Colebrook, Conn., whence he moved to Winsted in 1824, and soon after secured a large practice and high standing at the bar. He held the appointment of district attorney for four years under President Jackson, and was Lieutenant- Governor of the State in 1842 and 1844; besides which, he held the offices of postmaster and assignee in bankruptcy. He was a man of commanding person and pleasing address. As a lawyer he was adroit rather than learned, thorough in preparing his cases, quick to discern the weak points of his adversary, and energetic beyond most men in carrying forward his cases to a final issue. The same qualities were prominent in his political career, but his success as a lawyer was more decided than as a politician. About 1850 he withdrew from legal practice and devoted himself to financiering with decided success. He died May 22, 1855, at the age of sixty-one. “GrorcE 8. BOARDMAN, son of the Hon. Elijah Boardman, of New Milford, was admitted to the bar in 1821. He was a young man of decided promise, and was a special favorite of his uncle, Judge Boardman. His death was greatly lamented throughout the com- munity. His efforts at the bar gave proof of decided talent, and he had made himself a special favorite among the members. “ Joun ELMoRE was a native of Sharon. He set- tled as a lawyer in Canaan about 1793. He had no great eminence at the bar, but was a great favorite with his associates for his genial humor, pertinent anecdotes, and witty sayings. He lived to a very ad- vanced age. The last years of his life were devoted to zealous efforts in the cause of temperance. His son, of the same name, was also in the practice of the law for several years in Canaan. “GroRGE WHEATON spent a somewhat protracted life in Cornwall in the practice of law. He was ad- mitted to the bar about 1812, and at once engaged in professional occupations. He was an ingenious, sa- gacious, and perhaps it may be said crafty, lawyer, for opposing counsel were always fearful that he would spring upon them some new points to which their attention had not been directed. He was defi- cient in early education, but even his blunders in the use of language were often witty, and he was always listened to in his arguments with close attention. He understood well all the points in his case, and 34 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. presented them with great skill to the court. He had a successful career, and left a good name behind him. “SamMUEL CHURCH was a native of Salisbury, and a graduate of Yale College of the class of 1803, and he continued his residence in Salisbury while he was a member of the bar. He held quite a respectable standing as a lawyer, and for several years was the State’s attorney for the county. He had not attained to the higher ranks in his profession when, in 1832, he was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court, but to the duties of the latter office he devoted himself with great assiduity and success, and was in no degree inferior to his associates on the bench in those qual- ities which go to make a good judge of our highest court. On the expiration of the term of Chief Justice. Williams, in 1847, he was appointed his successor, and held that position during the remainder of his life. After his appointment as judge he removed to ‘Litchfield. He died a few months before he had reached the age of seventy years. “JaBEz W. HuntTINGTON, a native of Norwich, graduated at Yale College in 1806; came to Litch- field as a teacher and student-at-law in 1807, and continued to reside here until October, 1834, when he returned to Norwich, and died there in 1847, in his sixtieth year. While a resident of Litchfield he was elected a representative member of Congress, and judge of the Superior Court. From 1840 until his death he was a member of the United States Senate. “GIDEON HALL was a native of Winchester, and had abundant early advantages’ for an education, although he did not go through a college course. His father was a man of large estate, and the son was left in easy circumstances. He had a fair standing at the bar and did a considerable amount of professional business. Towards the close of his life he received the appointment of judge of the Supreme Court, but after a short term of service in that office consump- tion terminated his life.” Hon. TRUMAN SMITH was the oldest son of Phin- eas and Deborah Ann (Judson) Smith, and was born in Roxbury, on the 27th day of November, A.D. 1791. His father was the oldest son of a family, two of whose members, Nathaniel Smith, of Woodbury, and Nathan Smith, of New Haven, became very distinguished at the bar and in public life in Connecticut. Phineas Smith was a farmer, and was in no degree inferior in intellectual ability to either of his brothers. The sub- ject of this notice was brought up on his father’s farm, and owes whatever success he achieved in after-life to habits formed and principles inculcated in the home of his childhood. He was graduated at Yale College in 1815, and soon after commenced the study of law. He was admitted to the bar of Litchfield County in March, 1818. In the fall of the same year he opened an office for the practice of the law in Litchfield, and that village was his home until 1854. The bar of Litchfield County then numbered more than forty members, and several of them were eminent in the profession. Mr. Smith felt that at such a bar as this faithful study and indefatigable labor alone would insure success, and to such study and labor he devoted himself strictly, and he soon became known as a young lawyer of decided promise and marked ability. He soon acquired professional business, and at the end of ten or twelve years took rank among the able mem- bers of the bar in the management of the most im- portant cases before the courts in Litchfield County, and was sometimes engaged in such cases in other counties in the State. His habits and methods of practice were peculiar to himself. In the examination of witnesses and in the discussion of interlocutory questions he showed peculiar ability. The reluctance of a witness to disclose the truth and give a fair state- ment of the matters of which he was testifying, would sometimes provoke the most severe reprehension of the advocate, which he was not backward in exhibit- ing in court. He never went into the trial of an im- portant case without having made a thorough study of ali questions likely to arise in the course of the proceedings, and was generally well prepared to give such questions a thorough discussion. His method of argument to the court and jury was also peculiar to himself. His style and manner showed nothing of the polished refinement which marked the perform- ances of James Gould and Roger M. Sherman, but there was a power of thought and a strength of argu- ment attending his oral deliveries which made him a popular advocate. In his arguments at the bar he discussed nothing but the merits of the question, and he was heard with strict attention by the triers whom | he was addressing. Upon the whole, his career asa lawyer was eminently successful. Mr. Smith early took a deep interest in public af- fairs, and a considerable. portion of his subsequent career was devoted to public employments, to which he was appointed by the voice of his fellow-citizens, and to all matters which agitated the public mind he devoted the same assiduous attention and thorough examination which marked his professional labors. It followed, of course, that he became a prominent member of the different legislative bodies to which he was elected, and all the speeches which he de- livered in either house of Congress, to which he was elected, bore evidence of thorough labor in their preparation. He was elected to the Legislature of Connecticut, by the town of Litchfield, in 1831, 1832, and 1834, and had much to do in shaping the legisla- tion of those years. Buta wider field soon opened before him, and higher posts of duty awaited him. It was not the fashion of those times for candidates to urge their own claims, or spend their money in promoting their own advancement in public life. It has been said of Mr. Smith, and probably with truth, that he never packed a convention, never solicited a nomination, never asked a man to vote for him, and never addressed a political meeting when he .was a candidate for office. i \ i \\ ANN \\ \\ i \ ‘ i i 4 Ky \ NN an " a BENCH AND BAR. 35 In 1839, and again in 1841, he was elected to the National House of Representatives by decided ma- jorities in the district to which he belonged, which then embraced the county of Litchfield. The census of 1840 rendered necessary a new apportionment of members of Congress in the different States, and under that arrangement the counties of Fairfield and Litchfield were embodied into a single district, and from this district, thus enlarged, he was twice elected by large majorities. He was elected to the Senate of the United States for the term commencing March. 4, 1849, but he resigned his place before the expira- tion of the time to which he had been appointed. His career in both branches of Congress was honor- able and successful, and the speeches which he made in each were marked by the evidence that much study and reflection had been employed in their prepara- tion. In the House of Representatives his published speeches were: 1. On the New Jersey Broad Seal elec- tion case. 2, On our wool-growing and wool-manu- facturing interests. 3. On the territory to be acquired from Mexico by a treaty then pending. In the Sen- ate he delivered speeches on the following subjects: 1. On removals from office. 2. On a bill to admit California into the Union, and to establish several territorial governments. 38. On French spoliations, etc. 4. On the proposition of Mr. Douglas to levy tonnage on the States for the improvement of rivers and harbors. 5. On the construction of a railroad to the Pacific coast. 6. On the Nebraska question. Of the speech on the bill to admit California into the Union, and to establish several territorial governments, Mr. Webster, in a speech on the same question, made a few days afterwards, said, “It contained one of the clearest and strongest demonstrations that I have heard from the mouth of man.” All the speeches of Mr. Smith were fraught with good sense and sound logic. The last one delivered, Feb. 10 and 11, 1854, was a discussion on the repeal of the Missouri Com- promise, and expressed his full conviction that the measure foreboded incalculable mischief to the coun- try, and he felt bound to oppose to it an uncompro- mising resistance. He undertook to demonstrate that |: there was, and had ever been, an entire harmony in the elements on which the prosperity of the different sections of the Union depended; that there was an utter impossibility of maintaining an equilibrium be- tween the free and slave States, and that such equi- librium, if attainable, would be useless to the latter ; that the slavery question, which, during the few pre- ceding years, had made so much disturbance in and out of Congress, was of very little importance. Sub- sequent history has disclosed events which no one then foresaw. Mr. Smith had a decided preference for Gen. Tay- lor as a candidate for the Presidency in 1848, and was a member of the convention which gave him the nomination. He was also the chairman of the Na- tional Whig committee by which the canvass for the general was conducted. One of his colleagues on this committee was Abraham Lincoln, who spent a considerable time in Washington as a member of the committee during the canvass. On the accession of Gen. Taylor to the Presidency he proposed to Mr. Smith to make him Secretary of the Interior, thus constituting him a member of his cabinet, but Mr. Smith preferred to occupy his seat ‘in the Senate as best suited to his habits and method of life. Soon after the accession of Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency, a treaty was entered into between the United States and Great Britain for establishing in- ternational courts, to be located, two in Africa and one in the city of New York, to adjudicate slave- trading cases, each to consist of two judges, one rep- resenting the United States and the other Great Brit- ain. Mr. Smith was appointed to the New York court, and held the situation for several years; but our coast having been blockaded during the war, and slavery in the United States being abolished, there could be no cases to be submitted to the court except in connection with Cuba or some other slave-holding . country, of which there was very little probability, the two governments, by a new treaty, abrogated the courts and left the matters regarding them to the or- dinary courts. This was the last public office held _by Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith established his home in Stamford in 1854, where he has ever since resided. He had a law-office in New York, and practiced in the courts of that State and in the Supreme and Circuit Courts of the United States till 1872, when he retired from the profession. He has, to some extent, of late years occupied him- self in submitting his views to the public on topics which he deemed important, sometimes in pamphlets, but more generally through the newspaper press. He has taken much interest in the temperance cause, and his articles on that subject furnish very strong argu- ments in favor of the entire suppression of the traffic. Various other matters of much public interest have also received his attention. Mr. Smith was married, June 2, 1832, to Miss Maria Cook, daughter of Roger Cook, Esq., of Litchfield. She died April 24,1849. He was again married, Nov. 7, 1850, to Miss Mary Ann Dickinson, who still sur- vives. He now (1881), at the age of ninety years, enjoys comfortable health and has a good share of mental activity. CHARLES F, SEpGwick, of Sharon, was born in . Cornwall, Conn., Sept. 1, 1795. He prepared for col- lege with Rev. Truman Marsh, of Litchfield, and -Rev. A. R. Robbins, of Norfolk, principally with the latter. He entered Williams College in 1809, and graduated in 1813. After graduation he taught about three years and fitted several young men for college. He studied law with Gen. Elisha Sterling, of Salisbury, and Cyrus Swan, Esq., of Sharon, and 36 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. in March, 1820, was admitted to the bar. He married a daughter of Mr, Swan in 1821. He has been much .in public life, and has ever been faithful to the trusts imposed. He was a member of the House of Repre- sentatives in the Legislature in 1830 and 1831, and of the Senate in 1832; was appointed brigadier-general of militia in 1829 and major-general in 1831; was ap- pointed State’s attorney in 1856, and held that office by reappointment for eighteen years. Soon after he retired from office, and has since been a citizen of Sharon. Gen. Sedgwick has a decided taste for literary pursuits, and has added many highly interesting and valuable works to the historic literature of this sec- tion, among which may be mentioned “Sedgwick’s History of Sharon,” two editions, an excellent work, sketches of members of the Litchfield bar, various historical addresses, etc. Gen. Sedgwick has taken an active interest in historical matters, and to him more than any other person is due the preservation of the history of the bar of Litchfield County.—(Ep1ror.) ORIGEN Storrs SEYMOUR was born at Litchfield, Conn., Feb. 9, 1804; has always resided in his na- tive village and within a few rods of the place of his birth. After graduation he commenced the study of law. His own eyes were too weak to allow him to read for himself; his friend and classmate, Treat, therefore read aloud to him. He was admitted to the bar September, 1826, and at once commenced the practice of the law. He devoted himself without in- terruption to his professional duties for the space of twenty-five years; during that time, however, he sev- eral times represented his town in the General As- sembly, and in 1850 served as Speaker of the House. In 1851 he was elected a member of the United States Congress, and then for four years was occupied in public political life. He was elected as a Union Democrat, pledged to the earnest support of the com- promise measures then recently adopted on the subject of slavery. He strenuously opposed the well-known Kansas and Nebraska bills as being a violation of those compromises, On his retirement from Congress he was elected a judge of the Supreme Court, and held that laborious office eight years, from 1855 to 1868, that being the term for which he was elected. He then resumed the practice of law in copartnership with his son, Edward W. Seymour, and continued in a full practice till 1870. He was then chosen judge of the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut, which office he held until he became seventy years of age, having been chief justice during his last year of service. The con- stitution of the State limits the term of judicial life to the age of seventy. Since his retirement from judi- cial life he has declined to appear as an adyocate at court. He, however, spends some of his time in office business and as arbitrator and referee. Mr. Seymour was married, Oct. 5, 1830, to Lucy M. Woodruff, daughter of Hon. Morris Woodtuff, by whom he had four children,—Edward Woodruff, set- tled at Litchfield in the legal profession ; Storrs Ozias, clergyman of the Protestant Episcopal Church, set- tled in Litchfield, Conn.; Maria (deceased) ; Morris Woodruff, settled in the legal profession at Bridge- port, Conn., present State senator. He is a member of the Protestant Episcopal Church, and as such was one of the lay delegates for the Diocese of Connecticut in the Triennial General Conventions of 1865, ’68, ’71, ’74, ’77, and ’80. Re- ceived the degree of LL.D. from Yale in 1873. GrEorGE C. WoopRvFr, descended from Matthey Woodruff, one of the earliest settlers of Connecticut, and from Nathaniel Woodruff, one of the first settlers of Litchfield, is the eldest son of the late Gen. Morris Woodruff, of said town, and was born in Litchfield, Dec. 1, 1805. He graduated at Yale College in 1895, studied at the Litchfield Law School, and came to the bar in 1827. For more than half a century he has been in the successful practice of his profession in his native town, where he has ever been intrusted with positions of honor and responsibility, besides repre- senting his district in the Thirty-seventh Congress. In 1845 he published a history of his town. In 1829 he married Henrietta 8. Seymour, daughter of the late Ozias Seymour, and sister of ex-Chief Justice Origen S. Seymour, by whom he has one child living, —George M. Woodruff, of Litchfield. JoHy Henry Hvusparp was born in Salisbury, Conn., in 1804. His childhood and youth was spent on his father’s farm, with only those advan- tages for education which the district school af- forded. Ofthese he made such diligent use that at the early age of fifteen he was found qualified to be a teacher. Shortly after this he entered the office of the Hon. Elisha Sterling, of Salisbury, then a very prominent lawyer, as a law student. While a student he supported himself by teaching school winters. In addition to his studies in the law, before he reached his majority he had acquired a very good knowledge of Latin, and had read many standard books with great care, such as “ Rollin’s Ancient His- tory,” ‘“Plutarch’s Lives,” ‘The Spectator,” and others. He also attained some proficiency in mathe- matics. In these studies as well as in law he was guided and encouraged by the sound advice of Mr. Sterling. In later life he extended his reading into works of fiction, and somewhat into the realm of poetry; of Wordsworth and Burns he was especially fond, reading and rereading their poems with the keenest interest. At the April term of the County Court in Litchfield County, 1826, and before his twenty-second birthday, he was admitted to the bar, and immediately estab- lished himself -in practice at the village of Lakeville, in his native town, where he continued to reside for nearly thirty years. At that time Samuel Church, afterwards chief justice of the State, was living in Salisbury, and was in full practice at the bar, as was Cho (/Moodtreyff Abu 9¢ butter BENCH AND BAR. 37 Philander Wheeler, a man of high ability. Leman Church and Judge Burrill were in Canaan; Ansel Sterling, Cyrus Swan, and Charles F. Sedgwick were in Sharon; George Wheaton was at Cornwall, all of them men of eminence and lawyers of great skill. Surrounded by such opponents and competitors, young Hubbard found no time for idleness. He was spurred to his best. But whatever he may have lacked, he did not lack industry. Genuine mettle was in him, and before he left Lakeville he had liter- ally conquered for himself a place among the very foremost lawyers in the State, and had secured a very handsome estate. As a practitioner he was painstaking to the last de- gree.- He spared no effort. He was always intensely in earnest, believing thoroughly in his client and his cause. As astudent of the law he practiced all his life upon the maxim, which he said was given him by Gen. Sterling, “to know a few books well.” He had studied “Swift’s Digest,” ‘Starke’s Evidence,” and “Chitty’s Pleadings,” till he knew them by heart. He knew the “Connecticut Reports” so familiarly that there was no case and hardly a dictum that he could not recall. Other books were to him books for reference and not for study in the sense that they were. He was wont to say that everything could be found in our own reports ; if not’ expressly decided, the principle was there which would control. In 1847, and again in 1849, Mr. Hubbard was chosen State senator from the Seventeenth District. The latter year he gained considerable celebrity for a very able and vigorous opposition to the scheme for bridging the Connecticut River at Middletown. He defeated the project for a time, but lived to see it ac- complished more than twenty years later. The same year, 1849, he was appointed State’s attorney for Litch- field County, which office he held for four years. In 1855, Mr. Hubbard removed to Litchfield, where he resided till his death. All his life Mr. Hubbard had been a Whig, and subsequent to 1850 he was one of the “Conscience Whigs,” sympathizing deeply with the anti-slavery feeling then prevailing all over the North, and so naturally he became a Jeader in the Republican party from its formation. He took an active part in the campaign of 1860, which resulted in the choice of Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency. On the breaking out of the Rebellion he sacrificed a large part of his practice. The cause of the Union was to him in the place of a client. He actively engaged in rousing up a war feeling and in enlisting men. Enjoying a generous in- come, he spent money liberally to promote these ob- jects. He made presents of needful articles to the men who volunteered, or gave them money. Many times he provided for their families, and in all other ways he sought to carry forward the work of defeat- ing secession. He devoted himself to this work for the greater portion of the time during the years 1861 and 1862, rendering especial aid in recruiting the Thirteenth and the Nineteenth Regiments. The lat- ter regiment (afterwards the Second Heavy Artillery, Connecticut Volunteers) was composed entirely of Litchfield County men. In the spring of 1863 he was elected a member of Congress from-the Fourth District, and was re-elected in 1865. In the Thirty-eighth Congress he served on the committee on patents, and also on committee on post-offices and post-roads. In the Thirty-ninth Con- gress he was continued on the committee on patents and was on committee on roads and canals. He also was placed on several special committees. No man was ever more faithful to public duties than he. During the entire four years of his service in Congress he never failed to answer on a call of the House, ex- cept when absent on official duty by its direction, and once when sick. Outside this official labor, Mr. Hub- bard while in Washington found himself under great responsibility in caring for the soldiers from his State. Many Connecticut regiments were in the army of the Potomac, among them the Litchfield County regi- ment. In the terrible battles of the Wilderness hun- dreds of their numbers were killed, and hundreds more were brought wounded to the hospitals around Washington. In the battle of June 1, 1864, more than four hundred men of his own county regiment were killed and wounded. They were his neighbors, his acquaintances, his friends. Many of them had en- listed at his solicitation. It was an anxious time. Every hour that he could snatch from his public duty he devoted to the soldiers. There was not a day that he did not visit one or more of the hospitals. He sought out every Connecticut man, sat by their bed- sides, wrote letters for them, procured for those who were themselves unable medicine and delicacies at his own expense. No one appealed to him in vain. Many dying messages he faithfully transmitted to loved ones at home. He assisted friends to identify | and obtain the bodies of their dead, and in more than one instance he paid from his own pocket for embalm- ing bodies to be sent North. All this was to him a labor of love. He never regretted it. He always declared that he had his abundant reward in the suc- cess of the cause for which these men had fought. After his return from Congress, Mr. Hubbard en- gaged again in the practice of his profession, and con- tinued in it up to a short time before his death. He died on the 30th day of July, 1872. Mies T. GRANGER, son of James L. Granger and Abigail Tobey, was born in New Marlborough, Berk- shire Co., Mass., Aug. 12, 1817. arly in life he be- came dependent upon his own resources for a liveli- hood, having commenced at the early age of ten years to work in a woolen-mill for twelve and a half cents per day. He remained in this employment about two years and then hired to a farmer in Norfolk, receiving twenty-five cents per day, and continued working as a farm-hand in various localities until. 1835, when, concluding that farming was a hard life, and, at the 38 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. wages then paid hired men, not a quick way to get rich,—besides his health was failing,—he concluded to try teaching school. He entered the office of Dr. Benjamin Welch, in Norfolk, and began “reading up” for a schoolmaster. In the fall of the same year he passed examination and engaged as a teacher at twelve dollars and fifty cents per month for four months. He continued chiefly in this occupation until 1838, when he was induced to attend the seminary at Amenia, to better qualify him for the work he had chosen—teacher of common school. He remained here one term, and returned to Canaan, helped his uncle do the “ harvesting”’ on the Benedict farm; worked out in haying during the balance of season, and then concluded to return to Amenia, com- plete two or three branches of study which he had commenced, and at the close of the term find a school for the winter. He fully expected to close his “ going to school” at the expiration of this term, but things transpired quite otherwise. Upon his arrival at the seminary the second term, the principal, Davis W. Clark, sent for him to come to his room, and, after paying him some compliments upon his scholarship, etc., advised him to prepare for college. He followed his advice and commenced the studies required at Wesleyan University to enter freshman year. Went over the course during the academic year, and, with what he had done the first term at the seminary, he entered Wesleyan a freshman, in August, 1839, and was allowed to enter the sophomore class in mathe- matics. He was then, and always had been, without any means or money except what he had earned, and his earnings were well-nigh exhausted; but he ob- tained a school in Glastonbury in the winter after entering college (six months for twenty dollars per month), kept the school and kept up with his class, except that he fell back at the end of the college year in mathematics. Entered on sophomore year with- out condition in all studies. Kept school that year three months, and managed to be up with the class at the end of the year. Junior year he asked and ob- tained from the faculty the privilege of taking the junior and senior year together—to do two years’ work in one. He undertook it, had double recita- tions every day in most of the studies, kept school three months that winter, was examined in both classes at end of year, passed, and received his diplo- ma as A.B., August, 1842. In August, 1845, received the degree of A.M. In 1843 went to Louisiana; em- ployed as preceptor in family of Francis A, Evans, parish of West Feliciana; engaged for a year. Read law at same time. In April, 1845, was admitted to the bar in Wilkinson Co., Miss. Came back to Ca- naan, June, 1845. Entered the law office of Leman Church, Esq., as student. In October, 1845, he was admitted to the bar in Litchfield County. Remained in Mr. Church’s office till the spring of 1847, when he opened an office at the old village of “Canaan Four Corners,” in Couch’s “hat-shop.” Here he re- mained a year, and then went to the Depot, where he remained during his whole practice. In 1849 he was elected judge of probate, and held the office, with exception of two years, till elected judge of Superior Court. Was town clerk and treasurer. In 1857 wag elected member of House of Representatives; Gen- eral Assembly of Connecticut in 1866. Elected sen- ator of Seventeenth District in 1867. Re-elected sen- ator, and during this session was elected judge of Su- perior Court for eight years. At expiration of term was re-elected, and in 1876 elected to present position —associate judge of the Supreme Court of Errors; term commenced Nov. 16, 1876. He was married Oct. 22, 1846, to Miss Sarah C. Ferguson, of Sheffield. Judge Granger says, “For the benefit of young men dependent on brain or muscle in the battle of life, it might be stated that I never had but one dollar in my life except what I earned by hard work. My father once gave me a silver dollar,—my whole inheritance and patrimony.” Henry B. GRAveEs was born in Sherman (for- merly a part of Litchfield County) on the 4th day of April, 18238. He received a good common-school ed- ucation, and for a few months pursued more liberal studies in an academy with a view of entering college, but, owing to a sudden death in his father’s family of an elder brother, the boy of fourteen was needed upon the farm, where he remained till he was eighteen years of age, when he entered the law-office of James C. Loomis, Esq., of Bridgeport, and after pursuing the study of the law with that gentleman for three years and a half was admitted to the bar, at Litch- field, in April, 1845, and upon the Ist of May, 1845, commenced the practice of his profession at Plymouth, and continued there till October, 1849, when he opened. an office in Litchfield, where he has since continued in the active labors of the forum. He represented Litchfield in the General Assembly in 1858, 1866, 1867, 1876, 1877, and in 1879, taking a leading position in the legislation of the State, and drafting many of the laws now to be found in the public statutes. For many years he has been re- garded as one of the prominent attorneys of the county, and has been engaged in a large practice, as the dockets of the courts will attest, and the volumes of the Supreme Court of the State will verify. As a counselor he has been faithful and true to his clients, deferential to the court, courteous to op- posing counsel, and kind and helpful to his younger brethren. WILLIAM CoTHREN, son of William and Hannah Cooper Cothren, was born at Farmington, Me., Nov. 28,1819. He prepared for college at the Farmington Academy ; graduated at Bowdoin College (Maine) in 1843; received his second degree in course at the same institution in 1846, and the degree of Master of Arts, ad eundem, from Yale College in 1847. He studied law under the direction of Hon. Robert Goodenough, of Farmington, Me., a member of Con- WOOPDBD Ey, COV, BENCH AND BAR. 39 gress from his district, and the leader of the bar in his county, and with the late Hon. Charles B. Phelps, of Woodbury. He went to Woodbury in 1844, taught school for a while, continuing his law studies at the same time, and was admitted to the Litchfield County bar October, 1845. He immediately commenced the practice of his profession at Woodbury, and has con- tinued there in the performance of his duties as coun- selor to the present time. He immediately acquired a large practice in the several courts of the western half of Connecticut, and later in the District, Circuit, and Supreme Courts of the United States. For many years he has taken rank among the leading members of the bar of Connecticut. He takes great pride in his profession, and prefers excellence in that to any official station. He has mingled little in the political controversies of his time, preferring to devote his en- ergies to professional and literary pursuits. In the practice of his profession he prefers the investigation and discussion of intricate legal questions to the more strong display of forensic eloquence before a jury, though he holds himself ready for the performance of any duty of his profession. In short, he has a sincere love of his profession, and believes in no higher honor than that of a wise and upright coun- selor. A marked feature in the professional career of Mr. Cothren is his faithfulness and untiring devotion to the interests of his clients. No matter how trifling the amount at stake, or how uncertain the prospects of remuneration for his services, he labors just as hard and with the same zeal as though the case in- volved large interests and abundant reward. As a man of unflinching rectitude and integrity, as a care- ful and sagacious counselor, as a bold and successful advocate, ever contending for the right, he occupies an enviable position. He has a strongly contemplative mind, and he is | never happier than when he can steal a passing hour to be “alone in nature’s fane,” in the grand old woods, by the falling waters of the silvery cascade, or in the shaded dell, where he can hold silent com- munion with nature, in all her beauty and grandeur. He has a strong, logical, and practical mind, an exceedingly retentive memory, and great clearness and quickness of apprehension. THe seizes a point at once, and states it clearly and precisely. He makes careful preparation, and manages his cases with skill and ability. Difficulties do not discourage him; obstacles do not embarrass him; they but serve the purpose of making the attainment of his object the more secure. He is endowed with a will of the very highest order. It subjects the material to the spiritual in a degree rarely attained. He is the most diligent and laborious of men, never losing a mo- ment from his occupations. No man treats his equals with more courtesy and candor, his superiors on the bench or elsewhere with more respect and deference, and his juniors and infe- riors with more affability and kindness. Liberal and honorable in his practice with his professional breth- ren, he scorns all subterfuge, trick, or unfair advan- tage. As a citizen he is public-spirited and generous. His liberality is bounded only by his ability, and he gives freely to every worthy object for which appli- cation is made to him for assistance. His hand has aided every public work or improvement in his com- munity during his time. On the 8d of September, 1849, he was married, in Woodbury, to Miss Mary J. Steele, daughter of the late Dr. Samuel Steele, of the same place. They had one son, who died young. They have now an adopted daughter. He joined the First Congregational Church in Woodbury, July 7, 1850, of which he continues an influential member. He was elected a county commissioner for Litch- field County at the May session of the General As- sembly in 1851. He was elected senator of the Six- teenth Senatorial District in 1855. In April, 1856, he was admitted an attorney and counselor of the United States Circuit Court, and on the 8th of March, 1865, he was admitted an attorney and counselor of the Su- preme Court of the United States. He was elected corresponding member of the New England Historic Genealogical Society at Boston, Mass., May 5, 1847; a member of the Connecticut Historical Society, Nov. 23, 1852, of which for many years he has been a vice- president; an honorary member of the Old Colony Historical Society, at Plymouth, Mass., April 24, 1854; a corresponding member of the Wisconsin Historical Society, Jan. 17,1855; a corresponding member of the Vermont Historical Society, Feb. 3, 1860; a cor- responding member of the Maine Historical Society, Sept. 18, 1861; an honorary member of the Rutland County Historical Society, Oct. 8, 1868; and a mem- ber of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, Alpha of Maine, Sept. 20, 1878. From the twentieth year of his age he has been a frequent contributor, in prose and verse, to the press and the standard magazines of the day. He has steadily pursued this course in his leisure moments as a sort of rest and recreation, his latest literary labor being the preparation of the article on Wood- bury for this volume. No one holds a more ready and facile pen. It has been well said that a lawyer who confines himself exclusively to the study of his profession is a “man of one book.” A dread of being impaled in this category led him, in part, to literary labor. A short time after his settlement in Woodbury he turned his attention to the collection of the historical dataof the town. Theresult has been the publication of an elaborate history of that town, comprising three octavo volumes, and containing about two thousand five hundred pages in the whole. The first volume was issued in 1854, and was the pioneer work, as a full history of a town, that had been issued. Many histories of towns have succeeded, but none have “ 40 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. excelled it. It has received the highest commenda- tions of the public press and of well-informed critics. Though professedly a local work, it contains a very complete epitome of the historical events of Connec- ticut. His chapter on the early ecclesiastical troubles of the colony of Connecticut is the most complete, exhaustive, and authoritative that has yet been pub- lished. Of this work the late Rev. Dr. Chapin, of Glaston- bury, Conn., remarked: “The author has made a place for himself among the ‘men of the times,’ and his name will be blessed as long as ‘ Ancient Wooa- bury’ has a son living worthy of herself.” The late Governor Dutton, of Connecticut, said of it, “It embodies a large number of historical facts not to be found in other publications, of great interest not only to those who have a peculiar regard for the town of Woodbury, but to all who cherish the memory of our forefathers.” Rev. Dr. Fuller, late of Andover, Mass., said of it, “The historical portion, extending through a period of nearly two centuries, has all the absorbing attractions of a romance. The author has placed Connecticut, and the community generally, under perpetual obligations to him.” Judge Williams, late chief judge of Connecticut, said, “It will be highly valuable to the future historian of Connecticut.” Ex-President Day, of Yale College, remarked, ‘“ That the style of composition is such as history, biography, and statistics require; simple, lucid, and unostenta- tious.” Hon. Thomas Day, LL.D., late of Hartford, Conn., speaking of the work, said of it, “ As a part of the history of the State, no authority is more re- liable. It is minutely accurate, without being in the least degree tedious.” In a letter to Mr. Cothren, President Wayland, late of Brown University, assured him, “TI have no doubt yours will take an honorable * place in this most interesting class of historical works ; for you have done laborious and patriotic service to our common country, and will have the thanks of all those who cherish a veneration for our Puritan fore- fathers.” In all the social and confidential relations in life the character of Mr. Cothren is worthy of imitation. Few men have had truer or more devoted friends than he has always found for himself wherever he has been intimately known. The sentiment of friendship with him partakes of a high nobility. Of course it is not promiscuous, but is confined to those who can appre- ciate the same affection which he himself feels. For such his respect and esteem are entire. Those that are once loved are loved to the end. He does not see, or.seeing, has not the heart to notice a fault in one whom he admits asa friend. To others he is gener- ous; with a friend he is more than paternal. He rey- erences only what he truly admires, and: can love no one whose character he does not really respect. With these sentiments he has won for himself a circle of warm friends both in his public and private relations. It is to be hoped that he may long enjoy their friend- ship, and live many years to add to the well-earned fame which already gathers around his name. : GrorcE A. Hickox was born in Washington, Conn., in 1830, and graduated from Trinity College, Hartford, in 1851. He pursued the study of the law’ in the law school at Ballston, N. Y., and Yale law school, and in the office of Hollister & Beeman, in Litchfield. In 1853 he was admitted to the bar and commenced practice in Litchfield, where he has since resided. Since 1866 he has combined the practice of his profession with editorial work, having in that year become editor of The Litchfield Enquirer, and three years later its sole proprietor. He was a mem- ber of the Legislature in 1862. Marcus L. DrLtavan.—When nearly half a mil- lion of Huguenots left. France because of the revo- cation of the Edict of Nantes, they sought homes in those countries where their Protestant faith would be respected and could be enjoyed. Every nation that opened its arms to receive them brought within its limits a class of citizens honest, conscientious, deeply religious, industrious, energetic, intelligent, * and generally far advanced in all arts of industry,—a class whose presence was of immense benefit to it Many came to what, about a century later, became these United States. Among them was the progenitor of the present Delavan family, the name then being spelled De La Van. Later the last capital was dropped and the last two syllables were united, making the name De Lavan, and in process of time it became the more convenient Delavan of the present time. At the time of the Revolutionary war there were eleven brothers, descendants of the progenitor alluded to, all of whom took an active part in our struggle for national independence. Gen. Daniel Delavan was the trusted friend and adviser of Gen. Washington, and the warm, personal, and intimate friend of La- fayette, who presented him with a beautiful sword as a mark of his esteem. Gen. Delavan was wounded in the engagement at Stony Point, but not one of the brothers was killed,—a fact which, historians have declared, finds no parallel in the recorded history of this or of that of any other country. The general was also actively engaged in the war of 1812. The subject of this sketch came from the same stock. On the maternal side his ancestors, as far back as can be traced,—which is for several generations,—have been among the most solid, respectable, influential, and well-to-do natives of the towns adjoining New Haven, Conn., in which city, on the 23d day of August, 1832, Mr. Delavan first saw the light. By the dishonesty of those who should have protected the defenseless, the property his mother should have received was never permitted to come to her, and when she married she could call only a few hundred dollars her own. Hav- ing a large family, and her husband being laid up for many years with consumption, the little pittance which had been inherited, and that which had been accumu- lated in the early life of their union, was swept away BENCH AND BAR. 41 before our subject was born. At three years of age one of the members of the church with which his parents were identified called upon them, and, taking the little one upom his lap, began to question him about religious subjects. He was so pleased with the child’s answers, questions, and remarks that he wrote a Sunday-school book about him,—a work, however, which he never saw, the only copy his parents had carefully treasured up to present to him when he be- came old enough to fully appreciate it having myste- riously disappeared before that time arrived. When he was five years of age his father died, leaving one son younger than our subject, and one son and four daughters older. The death of his father forced his mother, in order that she might engage in the means of supporting those who were too young to care for themselves, to send him to the orphan asylum, where, however, she paid his board weekly. His health had always been quite poor, and, after several months of living on the the meagre and innutritious food of the institution, it was found necessary to send him to asea- side country town in order to save his life. There his health improved, and, returning to the place ofhis birth, he was sent to school until he was ten years of age; then, with a maturity unusual in one so young, he saw the necessity of contributing to the support of the family, which, by the second marriage of his mother, was in- creasing. The illness and death of his step-father, at about this time, strengthened his conviction that he should be a help to, and not a drain upon, the family ; so he obtained a situation in a printing-office,—that of the New Haven Daily Herald. This was finally merged into the Courier, and made a morning paper. As this change required night-work, and only the poorest kind of lights were used,—for gas had not then been introduced into New Haven,—our subject’s eyes com- pelled him to give up his position, after about seven years’ service in the same office without the loss of a single hour. Finishing his trade, a few months later, in the Waterbury American office, he worked there for a while as a journeyman, in Litchfield, and in Chicopee, Mass., and other places, in the same capacity, for a short time, and then gave up the mechanical part of the business. From his earliest recollection he had had an intense desire to qualify himself for the prac- tice of law, but he saw the necessity of a general education before he could properly pursue legal studies ; so, before his day’s work was begun, and after it was finished, until long after midnight, it was his daily custom to take his books to a quiet place and study them. So intense was his desire for an educa- tion that he used to carry his dinner and his books to the office where he was employed, and devote the noontime to study. This course was adopted when he first entered a printing-office, at about ten years of age, and was persevered in until after his admission to the bar. He has often said he “never had a boy- hood.” He seldom engaged in the pastimes which gave others of his age great delight, but always pre- ferred his books, or the society of much older persons than himself, to them. He had also a strong love of disputation and of public speaking, and while in his “teens” he would walk ten miles any evening, how- ever bad the walking was, or however stormy it might be, for the purpose of attending a lyceum. He was “brought up” in the Democratic party, and his first votes were cast for that party; but when the struggle for prohibitory legislation was going on in this State, and slavery was pushing itself into the Territories, he thought the main-springs of that party were “Rum, Romanism, and Human Bondage,” so he left it, and as soon as the Republican party was organized he united with it, and at every Presidential election since then he has ‘‘ stumped” some portions of this or some other State for that party. He has been elected a number of times collector of taxes of the town of Naugatuck, and has often been named for other offices, for which he has declined to run. As we have inti- mated, he qualified himself for admission to the bar before people were generally awake in the morning, or after they were asleep at night, though he attended a course of lectures before the law-school of Columbia College. An incident connected with his admission to the bar may be worth giving here. His strong political convictions, and his outspoken manner of presenting them, gave great offence to a former judge of one of the highest courts in the State and his son- in-law, and when his application for admission was presented by the State’s attorney of the county, who was his warm friend, the judge and his son-in-law ob- jected to its reception. Being pressed for the reason for such an unusual objection, they claimed that the applicant was not a resident of that county. Liter- ally, at that moment, that may have been the fact, but it was not when the application was placed in the - State attorney’s hands, nor would it have been at any time for many months before that. Some of the mem- bers of the bar learned that the reason assigned was not the real one entertained, and it did not take them long to become convinced that the opposition was really for political reasons. Still the judge and his obedient son-in-law had succeeded in presenting the matter in such a way that the members present were fearful of offending them if they were found to be very strongly opposed to them, so, though they voted to accept the application and examine the applicant, not a single member would consent tu be one of the committee of examination. For forty years three at- torneys, appointed by the bar, had constituted the ex- amining committee, but so much feeling had been ex- cited in this case that it was decided the whole bar should conduct the examination. There.were about thirty or thirty-five members of the bar present. Mr. Delavan had listened to all that had been said in op- position to him, and, taking into consideration the bitterness shown, the fact that he, though nominally in a law-office during his studies, had really had to pursue them when he should have been asleep, that 42 he had not had the most ordinary advantages of law- students, and that instead of being examined by a committee of three who were without prejudice, he must be examined by the entire bar, some of whom were known to be strongly opposed to his admission, he keenly felt the injustice, and also the danger of rejection. It seems, however, to have made him all the more cool and determined, and, after an examina- tion lasting nearly three hours, conducted by some of the best lawyers in the State, in which he answered correctly every question put to him except two, and corrected himself on one of those before it passed from consideration, the bar voted unanimously for his admission, paying him a very high compliment for the way in which he passed through the trying ordeal. When the war broke out Mr. Delavan was under bonds of many thousands of dollars as tax-collector, but, collecting all he could collect, he made a satisfac- tory arrangement with the authorities of the town, by which another collector took his place and his bondsman was released, and he hurried to enlist in the Fifteenth Regiment Connecticut Volunteers, influen- cing many to go with him. For his interest and activity in the Union cause he was offered various official positions, but his reply always was, “No! If I live through this struggle I want to feel that no man can say he has borne more of the ‘brunt of the battle’ than I have; and I do not mean that any one shall have even the shadow of a reason for saying that I enlisted only for some office.” So he remained a private until physical disability ren- dered him unfit for military duty and confined him in the hospitals at Washington and Darby, near Phila- delphia, from which latter place he was discharged, greatly to his surprise, and in opposition to his earnest protest. From the age of sixteen he had been a pro- lific writer for newspapers, and before the close of the war he was employed editorially on various papers. Twice he was one of the editors of the New Haven Palladium, for extended periods; for about two years he edited the New Britain Record, and for over five years he was the owner and chief editor of the Meri- den Daily Republican. For a number of years he also owned and edited the State Temperance Journal. All these papers were in Connecticut. While editing the Daily Republican his health became so shattered that his physician insisted upon a change. For a number of years he had been a licensed preacher in the Methodist Episcopal Church, supplying the pul- pits of pastors who were ill or absent, and visiting the various school districts in Meriden, evenings, to hold religious meetings, and when he was compelled to give up his Meriden paper a church in Hartland, Conn., which is situated in a very mountainous and healthy region, invited him to become their pastor. Believing that he could recover his health there while laboring in a cause to which he was warmly wedded, his presiding elder sent him there, putting him in charge of three churches. Five months after he went HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. there the greatest revival ever known in that section broke out, and about forty professed conversion. The labor of attending meetings every evening for a month, and being out until about midnight every night, brought his health back to the point where it was when he first went there, and recuperation seemed impossible. He remained more than a year afterwards with his people, but finally had to bid them good-by, Believing that a weekly paper would furnish sufficient mental exercise to keep him in working order, he pur- chased a paper in New Milford, named it The Housa- tonic Ray, and has published it ever since. Though so attached to newspaper labors, he has, much of the time while engaged in them, been in the full practice of his legal profession. In this State he has practiced at Southington, at New Britain, in New Milford, where he now is, and in other places. He has taken a somewhat unusual stand in his practice, publishing to the world that he will be connected with only those cases in which he feels that the moral right is on his client’s side, and no inducement is sufficient to make him violate that rule. Cou, JAcos B. HARDENBERGH was born in Wa- warsing, Ulster Co., N. Y., Aug. 4. 1881, the son of Col. L. Hardenbergh. At the age of thirteen he entered the Kingston Academy, at Kingston, for a four years’ business course, from which he graduated in 1848. Immediately after his graduation he took up the study of law, in the office of Judge J. O. Lin- derman, with whom he remained four years, being admitted to the bar in 1852. He practiced in King- ston until the breaking out of the Rebellion in 1861, when the Twentieth New York militia, of which he was a member, under Col. George W. Pratt, entered the “three months’ service,” during which term he was elected major. At the expiration of the engage- ment the regiment returned home and immediately proceeded to reorganize for the war, entering the service again in October, 1861. Col. Pratt was killed in the battle of Second Bull Run, when Lieut.-Col. T. B. Gates took command, Maj. Hardenbergh suc- ceeding the latter as lieutenant-colonel. He was appointed colonel on the muster out of Col. Gates in the fall of 1864, and by that title he is familiarly known, although justly entitled to the preface of “general,” having received the appointment of brevet brigadier-general, “for gallant and meritorious ser- vices,” in 1865. His regiment participated in some of the fiercest and most decisive battles of the war, Second Bull Run, South Mountain, Antietam, Fred- ericksburg, Gettysburg, Wilderness, Petersburg, and earned a most honorable record. They were mustered out Feb. 1, 1866, after having served nearly five years. At the close of the war, Col. Hardenbergh returned to Kingston, and resumed the practice of law until the fall of 1867, when he came to North Canaan, and purchased the law-office of Judge M. T. Granger, his present location. He was appointed clerk of the Probate Court—Frederick Watson, judge—the same BENCH AND BAR. year, and was subsequently elected by the Democrats judge of probate, town clerk, treasurer, registrar, etc., which offices he still holds. He was married in April, 1869, to Miss Delia Watson, of North Canaan. In 1870 he was elected to represent the town in the General Assembly, and in 1876-77 was senator from the Seventeenth Senatorial District of Litchfield County. He has several times been chosen as delegate to attend Democratic conventions, and is jdentified with almost every enterprise relating to the welfare of his town. He purchased the Connecti- cut Western News on Dec. 18, 1878, from which, in connection with his law business, he derives a com- fortable income. As a lawyer, Col. Hardenbergh is widely known for his natural ability, dignified courtesy, and thorough knowledge of the science of law; and his biting sar- casm, combining these three elements, makes him an opponent to be respected. Of the confidence reposed in him by his fellow-citizens, witness the various town offices he has held consecutively: since his location here. ‘ The fraternal disposition of Col. Hardenbergh can be felt and appreciated only by those whose privilege itis to enjoy his confidence and intimate acquaintance. His unconscious dignity, almost severe, inspires at once respect, and the impression that his stern ex- perience on the field and the cynical character of his profession have blunted the susceptibility in his nature that is calculated to insure success in one’s social and domestic relations. But a thorough ac- quaintance with the man discovers the contrary to be the fact. Few men have a faculty for retaining friends and commanding their respect to a greater extent than Col. Hardenbergh, and no man has a greater respect for the rights and opinions of others than. he. No adequate review of his life and characteristics can be given in a brief sketch like this. In him are com- bined the qualities found only in that rarity to which can truly be applied the words—without the irony— of Antony: “An honorable man.” GEORGE WHEATON was born in East Haven, Conn., in 1790. He lost his father when very young, and went to live with a Congregational clergyman, prob- ably in Southbury, when about twelve years of age. His mother died soon after. He availed himself with eagerness of his advantages for education, soon be- came a teacher, and steadily pursued his studies in preparation for the profession of his choice—law ; and in course of time came to Salisbury to become a stu- dent in the office of Judge Church, who occupied a high standing in legal circles. He was a close and careful student, was admitted to practice in 1813, and | settled in Cornwall Centre, then a thriving place. He there married Lewey, daughter of Medad Alling, an early settler of Canaan. Their children were Nancy (Mrs. William Baldwin), Cynthia (Mrs. Elbert Shep- ard), and George A. Mr. Wheaton soon became an important factor in Cornwall, and was selected to hold 43 various positions of public trust, was many times the representative of Cornwall in the General Assembly of the State, and for twenty years the postmaster at Cornwall Centre. For his second wife he married Eliza, daughter of Andrew Cotter, of Cornwall. Their only child, Lucetta, married Dr. P. C. Cum- mings. About 1840, Mr. Wheaton moved to West Cornwall, then making rapid growth from the advantages given by the opening of the Housatonic Railroad, and made that place his home until his death, Nov. 5, 1865, at the age of seventy-five years. For over half a century Mr. Wheaton moved among the citizens of Cornwall, active in political, educa- tional, and religious matters, and none ever questioned the purity of his motives, the honesty of his convic- tions, or the soundness of his judgment. He was a member of the Congregational Church for years. In politics he was in early life a Whig, afterwards a Re- publican. As a lawyer he was not so much noted as an advo- cate as for the thorough manner in which he prepared his cases. They were carefully arranged, and every little point on which dispute might arise was properly fortified. His knowledge of law was extensive, and it has been said of him that he never gave advice that was not the very best that could have been given under the circumstances as expressed to him. In pre- paring a case he was absorbed in his work, paying no attention to meals or sleep, and when made up and presented to a court he was uniformly found to be successful. Of one thing his clients were assured: all the law favoring their side would be presented, and in the clearest, briefest’ manner, and the court always listened when they were presented. As a consequence, he had many and good clients and acquired a hand- some property. As a citizen, Mr. Wheaton was conservative, and in favor of all things tending to improve, elevate, and dignify society, but he did not assume that all things claiming to be of benefit were really so. If, on in- vestigation, they proved to be desirable, he gave them his persistent and unwavering support. By his death Cornwall lost an able lawyer, a good citizen, and an honest man, one lamented by all of the better class of the community. G. W. Shepard, son of Elbert Shepard, bears his grandfather’s name, and inserts his portrait in this work, Fiorimonp D, FyLeR was born in Torrington, Conn., Dec. 11, 1834. He commenced the study of law in the office of Judge Gideon Hall, at Winsted, where he continued as his health would allow until the spring of 1864, when he attended Yale Law School that term. He was admitted to the bar in 1864, and returned to Yale Law School and studied one year, and received the degree LL.B., July, 1865. In Sep- tember, 1865, he located in Winsted as an attorney-at- law. He was a member of the Legislature in the 44 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. May session of 1872. He was elected by the Legisla- ture of 1877 judge of the District Court of Litchfield County for four years from July 1, 1877. AvGustus Hatt FENN was born in Plymouth, Conn., Jan. 18, 1844. In March, 1862, he commenced the study of the Jaw in the office of Ammi Giddings, of Plymouth, and in the following August enlisted in the Nineteenth Regiment Connecticut Volunteers, subsequently the Second Artillery. The following extract concerning his military career is taken from Vaill’s history of the regiment: “He proved himself one of the best drill-masters and disciplinarians in the regiment, and one of the most competent officers in every position. Before going to the front he was made captain of Company C. On the 22d of June he led his company into the skirmish at Petersburg as far as it advanced, and was then and there detailed assistant adjutant-gen- eral on Upton's staff, vice Capt. Sanborn, of the Fifth Maine, and, mount- ing a horse which had been brought to him, commenced his duties at once. When the regiment left the Sixth Corps at Tenallytown, in July, he was relieved. In September he was appointed judge-advocate of the division court-martial, which tried twenty-five cases. At Cedar Creek he lost his leftarm. The surgeons at Annapolis proposed to muster him out and discharge him for disability, but he protested, and wrote to Gen. Mackenzie, urging his interference. The consequence was that he was retained, and in less than seven weeks from the time he had an arm taken off at the shoulder he reported for full duty at the front, and was at once detailed as assistant adjutant-general of the brigade again, which detail was afterwards changed to brigade inspector. He subsequently partici- pated in several fights. He was detailed as judge-advocate five different times, was brevetted major after Cedar Creek, promoted to major in Jan- uary, 1865, brevetted lieutenant-colonel for Little Sailor’s Creek, and colonel for services during the war.” At the close of the war he returned, and in Septem- ber, 1865, resumed his studies in the office of Kelloge & Terry, in Waterbury, Conn. He remained there until Feb. 15, 1867, when he was admitted to the bar at Litchfield. After passing one year in the law school of Harvard University, obtaining the degree of LL.B., he commenced practice, Jan. 1, 1868, in Waterbury. Removed to Plymouth, April 1, 1869, remained there until March 14, 1876, but opened an office in Winsted, July 1, 1875, where he has since practiced and now resides. Col. Fenn was city clerk of Waterbury in 1866-67 ; judge of probate, town clerk, and register of births and deaths in Plymouth, 1869 to 1876; and is now judge of probate for the Winchester District. In 1875 he was the Republican candidate for Secretary of State. ALBERT P, BRADSTREET, son of Thomas J. and Amanda T. Bradstreet, and grandson of Seth Thomas, deceased, was born in Thomaston on the 9th day of June, 1846. He attended school in his native village and worked upon his father’s farm until the fall of 1867, when he entered Yale College, where he gradu- ated in the year 1871. In October of the same year he entered the law department of Columbia College in New York City, and graduated with the degree of LL.B. in the spring of 1878. After remaining in the office of Webster & O’Neil, in the city of Waterbury, a few months, he opened a law-office in Thomaston, where he has since remained, in the enjoyment of a lucrative practice. He was elected as representative of Thomaston in the Legislature in the years 1877 and 1878, and in the year 1880 was elected senator from the Sixteenth District for two years, being the first Republican elected to that position in his district since 1873. He was also appointed deputy judge of the Waterbury City Court in 1879, a position which he now holds. Mr. Bradstreet has held the office of town clerk of Thomaston since the incorporation of the town in 1875, and is at present a member of the board of education. Mr. Bradstreet is held in high esteem by the bar of Litchfield County, and his legislative experience has brought his name quite prominently before the people of the State. Hon. Augustus PETTIBONE was born at Norfolk, Conn., Feb. 19, 1766. He was a descendant of John Pettibone, who came from Wales, and served under Cromwell until the end of the wars, and emigrated to America about 1650. He was admitted a citizen of Windsor in 1658. John Pettibone shortly after this removed from Windsor to Simsbury, and was the ancestor of the Pettibone family now spread abroad through most of the United States. Giles Pettibone, a descendant of this John Pettibone, removed from Simsbury to Litchfield County, and settled in that portion of it which the next year (1758) was incorpo- rated under the name of Norfolk. At the first town- meeting, held in 1758, forty-four citizens attended, three of whom were Pettibones,—Eli, Isaac, and Giles, the father of Augustus Pettibone. Giles Pettibone was the first representative from Norfolk in the General Assembly, a position which he occupied for twenty-six sessions; he was also judge of probate from 1779 to 1807; justice of the peace for thirty years ; and treasurer of the town for forty years. He served in the war of the Revolution, as a commissioned officer, at the battles of Saratoga and the capture of Burgoyne, and in the campaigns on the Hudson, carrying his title of colonel during his life. He was twice married and had eleven children. The mother of Augustus Pettibone was the daughter of Col. Michael Humphrey, of Simsbury, and left four chil- dren. Augustus Pettibone, at the age of fourteen, accompanied his father to the field and served several months. In 1784 he entered Yale College, where he continued about two years, but did not graduate. In 1787 he began reading law with Dudley Humphrey, Esq., of Norfolk, then in practice there, and continued with him from September to the following April, when he went to Litchfield, and attended Judge Reeve’s lectures until March, 1790. He was admitted to the bar in Litchfield in 1790, and settled in prac: tice at Norfolk. He continued in active practice until 1812, when from infirm health he relinquished his practice; but in the same year he was appointed associate judge of the County Court for Litchfield County, and continued such until 1816, when he was appointed chief judge of the County Court, and held that office until May, 1881. At the age of sixty-five 4 a _¥, Lf Lue tA LO >. WA LA O00 a V1 E tO) BENCH AND BAR. years he resigned, declining to hold any public office. Judge Pettibone represented the town of Norfolk in thirty-two sessions of the General Assembly, and in 1880 and 1881 he was senator from the Seventeenth Senatorial District. In 1818, Judge Pettibone was a member of the constitutional convention, and a member of the committee which drafted the con- stitution for consideration of the convention, and voted for its adoption. He was a justice of the peace for nearly forty years, and judge of probate from 1807 to 1822, succeeding his father in that office. Judge Pettibone occupied an honorable position in his profession, and was greatly esteemed by his brethren of the bar for his ability and integrity. He was forcible and logical in his address, but wholly without effort at display, and with little personal ambition. Thoroughly sincere and earnest himself, he despised all attempts at deception or trifling, and could not endure any resort to subterfuge, or any hypocrisy. The latter years of his long life were spent at his home in Norfolk, in the care of a small farm, which afforded him needed exercise and recreation, and in the management of the estate he had accumulated in his business. He died Oct. 4, 1847, leaving a wife, but no children. The following inscription, found upon the monu- ment of his father, Col. Giles Pettibone, in the old burying-ground at Norfolk, so fitly describes and applies to the life of Judge Pettibone that it is in- serted here: “ Hig life was honorable to himself and useful to society. He was distinguished by various marks of honor from his fellow-men, was prompt in their service and enjoyed their confidence through a long life devoted to public empluyments. To the needy and unprotected poor he was a father and a friend. Tears of sorrow bedew his grave who felt for the sufferings of others. Mortality, tho’ it presents a barrier to the works of good men, does not obscure their virtues. The life of the just man shines with lustre beyond the grave.” Rufus Pettibone, a brother of Hon. Augustus Petti- bone, graduated at Williams College in 1805, studied law, and about 1818 emigrated to Missouri, then a territory, and settled there as a lawyer. He was a man of brilliant talents and education, and imme- diately took high rank as a lawyer. He was a mem- ber of the constitutional convention of Missouri, and was chosen one of the circuit judges of the State. Afterwards he was appointed chief justice of the State by Governor McNair, the first Governor of the State, and held the office until his death in 1825. S. Pettibone, another brother of Augustus Petti- bone, a man of excellent ability and education, also a lawyer, was a graduate of Williams College, class of 1800. He died in Norfolk, Conn., in the prime of life. Levi Pettibone, another brother of Augustus Petti- bone, was the companion of Henry R. Schoolcraft in his exploring tour through Southwestern Missouri and Arkansas in 1817, and afterwards settled in Missouri, where he was many years in responsible positions, as 4 45 judge of probate and clerk of the Circuit Courts. He is still (in 1881) living in the city of St. Louis, in his one hundred and first year, in the enjoyment of fair health and considerable vigor. Until his eyesight failed, when he was ninety-seven years of age, he was an excellent correspondent, and engaged to a con- siderable extent in active business pursuits. Hiram P, LAWRENCE was born at Norfolk, Conn., in 1833. Was a member of the class of 1855 in Yale College, but did not graduate. Read law with Hon. F. D. Fyler, of Winsted, in 1870, was admitted to the bar in Litchfield County in 1878, and is settled in practice at Winsted, Conn. JAMES HUNTINGTON was born in South Coventry, Conn., June 4, 1833. He studied his profession in the office of Loren P. Waldo and Alvan P. Hyde, at Tolland, Conn; subsequently graduated at the law school at Poughkeepsie, N. Y.; was admitted to the bar of Fulton County in 1859, and in the same year commenced practice in Woodbury, where he has since resided. He is judge of probate for Woodbury Dis- trict, and State’s attorney for Litchfield County. ATTORNEYS’ FEES IN 1793. The following interesting extracts are from the records of a “ Barr” meeting held Dec. 18, 1793: “ Ata meeting of the bar held Dec. 18, 1793, of which Adonijah Strong, Esq., was chairman, it was voted, ‘ that Frederick Wolcott, Esq., of Litch- field, be Clerk of this Barr, and have power to make Records of all Re- solves of this Barr, to make and certify Copies thereof, and to perform all other Duties incident to said Office.’ “ Resolved, That in future the Fees to be charged by each Member of this Barr in all Causes in which he may be employed be established as follows, vizt: “Tn Common Pleas, £o a da “Retainer 0 12 0 Term Fees........ 0 1 0 On appointment of Auditors. 116 0 Arguing Remonstrance to Report o: 2 2 0 Attending Arbitrator each Day 1 Ww oO “ Before a justice, nine Shillings at least, and more in proportivu to the distance and importance uf the case. “The Members present and who subscribed to the above table of fees are as follows: Tapping Reeve, Adonijah Strong, Daniel Everitt, David N. Brinsmade, Teaac Baldwin, Jr., Ephraim Kirby, Benjamin Stiles, Jr., Nathan Preston, Judson Canfield, Samuel Bostwick, John C. (Smith, Nicholas 8. Masters, John Allen, Uriel Holmes, Nathan Smith, John Elmore, Joseph Canfield, Augustus Pettibone. £ 8s d. “ Arguing Plea of Abatement, there being no other defense in the CaS@........-ccseeeeeeeeeeene i & © The same with further defense .. 0 BO Arguing Demurrer or Petition for ne - 1 16 #0 a Bill in Chancery 2 2 0 Silent Appeal, including term fees. »- 1 4 0 Arguing Issue in fact..........-eeereeee -2 2 0 Ae Motion in Arrest of Judgmen 3 1 4 0 On appointment of AUGItOrS...... 46+ petreses 1 4 0 Arguing Remonstrance to report of Auditors... 1 4 0 In Superior Court, £ ss d. “Retainer - 0 18 +O » Term Fee... ek 2 Arguing Plea of Abatement * 1 10 0 Demurrer...... 6 2 B Issne in fact oe oO oO Arguing Motion in Arrest of Judgment » 1 do oo se Bill in Chancery....sasesseeseeeree 4 10 O “Edmond Akins, Philo Ruggles, Daniel W. Lewis, William Cogswell, Matthew B. Whittlesey, Frederick Wolcott, Elisha Sterling, James Thoni- 46 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. son, David Tallman, Eli Curtis, Aaron Smith, Roger Skinner, David Dag- gett, Isaac Mills, M. Strong, Joel P. Pettett.” THE COURTS IN 1820. Under the old government the Superior Court con- sisted of nine judges, and they were selected annually by the Legislature. Under the constitution the num- ber was reduced to five, and they held their office during good behavior or until they reached the age of seventy years. In like manner the judges of the County Courts were reduced from five to three. Formerly these judges held the Superior Courts, but now they are holden by one judge. THE SUPERIOR COURT. There were sessions of the Superior Court in each year, holden on the third Tuesdays of August and Feb- ruary, and the terms rarely extended beyond two weeks. If they reached to the third week, they were deemed to beof extraordinary length. TheSuperior Court had no original jurisdiction except as a court of equity. All its actions at law came up by appeal from the County Court, and generally important cases were carried up without a trial in the court below. The party wishing to appeal his case would demur either to the declara- tion or plea, as the case might be, suffer a judgment to be entered against him, and appeal from it, and then change his plea in the Superior Court as the exigencies of his case may require. The making of copies in the case appealed was a very profitable item in the business of the clerk. All cases at law wherein the matter in demand exceeded seventy dollars were appealable, and all matters in equity in which the sum involved exceeded three hundred dollars were brought originally to the Superior Court. In criminal matters the jurisdiction of both courts was concurrent, except in crimes of a higher grade, which were tried exclusively in the Superior Court. A case was pretty certain to reach a trial at the second term after it was entered in the docket unless special reasons could be shown for its further continuance. THE COUNTY COURT. The County Court had an important agency in the administration of justice fifty years ago. Under the old form of government it consisted of one judge and four justices of the quorum; under the constitution, of one chief judge and two associate judges. There were three sessions of the. old County Court in each year, in March, September, and December. The September term was generally short, merely dis- posing of the criminal business and such other pre- liminary matters as could not be passed over. The March term lasted three weeks, and the December term from four to six weeks, as the business might de- mand, The first half day was always taken up in calling the docket. Mr. Wolcott had his files ar- ranged alphabetically, corresponding with the entries on the docket, and of these some member of the bar, usually one of the younger, had charge. The sheriff took his station in the centre of the bar, and as the cases were named by the clerk the proper entries were made both on the docket and on the file, and then the file was passed to the sheriff, who delivered it to the party entitled to it, and thus, at the close of the pro- ceedings, all the files had passed into the hands of the members of the bar, where they remained until the case received final disposition. Three hundred cases were considered as constituting a small docket, and there were as many as nine hundred entered at a single term. In 1820 there were two grades of lawyers in the State. The first admission only authorized the candi- date to practice at the County Court, and a service of two years was required at that bar before he was al- lowed an examination for admission to the bar of the Superior Court. The statutes of the State were sub- sequently revised under the superintendence of Judge Swift, and many and material alterations had been made to conform the provisions of the law to the new order of things under the constitution. The question came before Judge Mainard, and he decided that under the revised statutes an admission to the bar of the County Court gave the candidate authority to practice in all the courts in the State; and that de- cision was assented to by all the judges. The matter of examining candidates for admission to the bar was, in those days, an imposing solemnity, and the day for that proceeding was a marked day of the term. All the members of the bar were expected to be present, and few failed of attending.. The com- mittee of examination occupied the judges’ seats, the chairman, holding the place of the chief judge, indicating to each separate member of the committee the subject in which he was expected to examine the candidate, and thus a thorough and searching exami- nation was had. After the examination was closed the candidates retired, and the members of the bar gave their opinions seriatim on the question of the ad- mission of the applicant. Sometimes candidates were rejected. It had been the practice in early times to have an entertainment at the close of the ex- amination at the expense of the successful condidates, but this had been dispensed with when I was ex- amined. Stories were told of some eminent members of the bar who, on such occasions, indulged in prac- tices which were not credible to their reputation for temperance and sobriety. Perhaps it was for this reason that the practice was abolished. PRACTICE, Statutory provisions and the advance of legal sci- ence, as well as a more just sense of what is due to the best interest of litigation, have made great changes in the course of proceedings before the courts during the last fifty years. Then it was customary for counsel to take advantage of any trivial omission which could be found in the proceedings, and a case never came to trial until every possible effort for BENCH AND BAR. abatement or delay had been exhausted. Our statute in relation to amendments had not then received so liberal a construction, nor was it in itself so liberal in its provisions as it now is; and thus opportunity was afforded for the display of much ingenuity in the prosecution of. dilatory pleas. Then there were no statutory provisions relating to injunctions, all the power which the court had in that matter being that with which it was invested by the common law as a court of equity, and hence very little will be found in our reports on this subject until about 1826, after the statute authorizing the judges to grant temporary injunctions had been passed. This statute was introduced into the Legis- lature by Judge Swift, who was a member for several sessions after his retirement from the bench. Since then many cases relating to this branch of jurispru- dence have been before our courts. Probably more than half the suits commenced in our County Courts fifty years ago were brought to enforce the collection of debts, and in some localities this was a profitable business. The County Court then had jurisdiction in all cases where the matter in demand exceeded the sum of fifteen dollars, and this brought into it a great number of suits now tried by single justices, and accounts for the great diminution in the number of cases now brought here, Piles of learning were devoted to destruction by the edict of the Legislature admitting parties and other persons in interest to be heard as witnesses. nicest and most refined legal questions were fre- quently brought before the courts for decision in matters relating to the interest of witnesses, but now they are almost forgotten by the most learned of the profession. THE AUTHORITIES THEN IN USE. The statutes then in force were the revision of 1808, by far the most elaborate and complete of any ever published. It- contains a complete history of the legislation of Connecticut on all subjects of statutory enactment from the first, and is still a useful book for study by the profession, {he principal labor of its preparation for publication was performed by Thomas Day. Comparatively few American authorities were cited | in our courts then. Mr. Day had published four vol- umes of Day’s Reports, and then had suspended further publication for want of encouragement, The Legislature, in 1815, had authorized the court to ap- point a reporter, and had given him a salary. Under such an appointment Mr. Day had commenced pub- lishing the Connecticut Reports, and had published three volumes of them when he published the fifth of Day, thus filling the gap between the fourth of Day and the first of Connecticut. The New York Re- ports, by Caine and Johnson, down to the twelfth of Johnson, and twelve volumes of the Massachusetts Reports were out, and these, with our own reports, The | 47 were about all the American authorities which were cited in our courts. Not a single American ele- mentary work had then been published except Swift’s System and Swift’s Evidence. The English Reports from Burrows down, including Douglas’, Cowper’s, Term, and East’s Reports, down to the twelfth vol- ume, with Blackstone’s Commentaries, which were always on the table, were the staple authorities of the times. Judge Reeve said that he considered Cowper’s Reports the best that had then been published of the decisions of the Court of King’s Bench. The following is a list of the present members of the Litchfield bar: Litchfield. George C. Woodruff, George M. Wood- ruff (railroad commissioner), Origen 8. Seymour (does not appear in court as counsel), George A. Hickox, Henry B. Graves, Henry H. Prescott, Dwight C. Kil- bourn, Wm. L. Ransom (clerk of the Superior Court), Charles B. Andrews, Frank W. Wessells, Edward W. Seymour. Winchester.—R. Hitchcock (judge of the Superior Court), Augustus H. Fenn, Hiram P. Lawrence, Wel- lington B. Smith, Samuel B. Horne, William H. Ely, William F. Hurlbut, Florimond D. Fyler, Samuel A. Herman. ; New Hartford—Jared B. Foster, John B. Betts, Nathan Morse. Riverton.—Hiram Goodwin. Wolcottville—Gideon H. Welch, George W. Cole. Thomaston.—Albert P. Bradstreet, F. W. Etheridge. Terryville—Henry Plumb. Harwinton.—Abijah Catlin. Woodbury.—_James Huntington, William Cothren, George F. Shelton. New Milford.—John S. Turrill, James H. McMahon, T. Dwight Merwin. Sharon.—J. Wade Hughes, Charles F. Sedgwick. West Cornwall.—Arthur D, Warner, N. A. Nicker- son. Lakeville—Hubert Williams. Salisbury——Donald J. Warner, Donald T. Warner. Canaan.—M. T. Granger (judge of Court of Errors), Jacob B. Hardenberg, A. T. Roraback. Falls Village —Lee P. Dean, Dwight W. Clarke. Washington.—William H. O’Hara, The senior members of the bar of this county have, many of them, made up their records; those still left are soon to follow, and the juniors are to assume their places at the bar and on the bench ; to them will soon be committed these great responsible trusts. The per- petuity of our free institutions is committed to the guardianship and keeping of the bar and judiciary of our free country, for the history of the world teaches, and all free government illustrates, this truth,—treat the subject lightly as you will,—that to the profession of the law civil government is indebted for all the safe- guards and intrenchments with which the liberties of the people are protected; that legislation is shaped, constitutions enlarged, amended, and adopted by the 48 enlightened administration of the statesmen, both of England and the United States, who have been in both, and are in all free governments, educated for the bar, and, ascending by the inherent force of their dis- ciplined, professional life, they become the directors of the destinies of states and nations. Military chieftains may spring into power, tyrants may dazzle with the glamour of military parade and the pomp of war an oppressed and frenzied people, but they turn as the cannonade dies away to the states- manship of the country, and call to the parliaments and congressional halls for final debate the arbitra- ments of the liberties of the people. From the days of King John to the present hour the bench and bar have furnished the statesmen who have erected the bulwarks of constitutional law, and extorted from tyrants the Magna Chartas which have secured to the oppressed the guarantees of free insti- tutions. Imbued with the historical traditions of their pre- decessors, and tracing the paths they have trod, emu- lating their good example, it should become more and more the resolute purpose of the Litchfield County bar to so walk in the light of their professional teach- ings that when they are called to follow them to that upper court, and file their judgment-roll of the great trial of life with that Supreme Judge from whose bar they can take no appeal,— “Thou go not like the quarry-slave at night Scourged to his dungeon, but, sustained and soothed By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch About him and lies down to pleasant dreams,” CHAPTER III, MEDICAL HISTORY. Organization of Medical Association in 1767—Early Physicians—Names of Members of Medical Society from 1808, with Dates of Admission— List ef Presidents and Secretaries from 1808 to 1881—Present Members —Present Officers. ‘ As early as January, 1767, a medical association was formed in this county, composed of the most emi- nent physicians then in practice here. Its object was to establish rules of practice and intercourse, promote medical science by providing for annual consultations and dissertations, and to protect the reputation of the profession and the health of the community from the inroads of ignorant pretenders to medical science. Among the gentlemen composing this body were Joshua Porter, Lemuel Wheeler, Joseph Perry, Seth Bird, William Abernethy, Samuel Catlin, Simeon Smith, Cyrus Marsh, Ephraim Gitteau, John Calhoun 5 etc. One of the earliest physicians of the county was Oliver Wolcott. He was the son of Hon. Roger Wol- cott, of Windsor, a former Governor of the colony. HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. He had served as an officer in the French war, and settled himself in Goshen before the organization of the county in the practice of his profession. Whether he continued in practice as a physician after his ye- moval to this town is not known ; probably, however, his official duties as sheriff prevented it. He was sub- sequently honored with almost every official place which a good man would covet: he was a member of the House of Representatives, of the Council, a judge of probate, a judge of the County Court, a representative in Congress, a signer of the Declaration of Independ- ence, lieutenant-governor and Governor of his native State, and, more than all, the father of an excellent family. He is said to have been a man of uncommon diffidence and distrustful of his own ability. His public communications display sound judgment, and his more confidential correspondence a warm affec- tion and a pure purpose. Dr. Seru Biro, of Litchfield, probably held the first place among the early physicians of the county, His reputation was widespread. For acuteness of discrimination and soundness of judgment he was not excelled. Dr. JosEPH Perry, of Woodbury, was not only eminent in his profession, but, what was unusual in his day, he excelled as a belles-lettre scholar and was a gentleman well read in various branches of science. Later generations produced eminent and accom- plished physicians: Dr. NATHANIEL PERRY, son of the gentleman just named; Dr. DANIEL SHELDON, of Litchfield; Dr. FowLEr, of Washington; Rocxk- WELL, of Sharon ; Wrtcu, of Norfolk; Trckwor, of Salisbury. Dr. SAMUEL WoopwaRD, of Torrington, was not only a physician of high repute himself, but he was almost literally a father of the faculty. Among the surgeons of note, in earlier times, were Dr. SAMUEL CATLIN, of Litchfield, and at a later period Dr. SAMUEL R. GAGER, of Sharon. The medical profession in this county has pro- duced some writers of respectability. Dr. ELISHA Nortu was for several years a physician of extensive practice in Goshen, and he afterwards removed to New London. He published an approved treatise on spotted fever, which extensively prevailed in Goshen and its vicinity while he resided there. Dr. CALEB Ticxwor, of Salisbury, was brother of the late excellent Dr. Luther Ticknor, of that town, and of Dr. Benajah Ticknor, for many years a surgeon in the navy of the United States, and, although a young man when he removed to New York City, about the year 1832, he rose rapidly to a high place in his profession. He published several medical works, the most popular of which was the “ Philoso- phy of Living.’’* *The above reference to the physicians of the early days is taket from the address delivered by the late Judge Samuel Church at the Litchfield centennial, in August, 1851, MEDICAL HISTORY. 49 THE MEDICAL SOCIETY.* The records of the old society are doubtless lost. The following is a list of members of the Litchfield County Medical Society in 1808: Samuel Woodward, President; Samuel Buel, Clerk; Anson Tuttle, John Raymond, Aaron Coleman, P. B. Fowler, Ebenezer Smith, William H. Taylor, Roswell Abernethy, Jesse Carrington, John Calhoun, Samuel Rockwell, J. R.~ Eastman, Elijah Lyman, Samuel Orton, Timothy Clark, Gideon Woodruff, Asahel Humphrey, Joshua Cornwall. Since then the following admissions have been made: 1808.—Anson Wright, John C. Warner, David Warner, Launcelot Phelps. 1809.—Samuel B, Woodward, Henry Tuttle, 1810.—Jehial Williams, Edmond Allen. 1811.—Elisha North. 1812.—Frederick Graves, John Warner. 1813.—James R. Dodge, Conant Catlin, Asahel Hale, E. L. Hart, Ira N. Bronson. 1814.—Jobhn M. West, Elmore Everitt, Curtis Hurd. 1815.—Norman Smith. 1816.—William Buel, Erastus Bancroft, William Marsh. 1817.—Benjamin Platt. 1818.—Samuel Enstie. 1819.—Henry Fish, Luther Tichnor, Gaylord Wells, Samuel Andrews, George O. Jarvis, Orvid Plumb. a 1820.—Roswell Abernethy, John M. West. 1821.—Horatio Gridley, Chauncey B. Foot, Samuel W. Gold, Johnson C. Hatch. 1822,—Benjamin Welch, Elias W. Williams, Thomas Brinsmade. 1823.—Sherman Woodward, Clark Chapman, Samuel Chittenden. 1824.—Jehial Abbott, Uriah Turner. 1825.—Benjamin F. Cleaveland, Samuel R. Childs, 1826.—Eli Reed, Ives Cowles, William Woodruff. The following is the first complete list of members, made in 1827: Alanson Abbe, William Buel, Samuel Buel, John M. West, Samuel R. Childs, Manly Peters, John W. Russell, Norman Landon, Samuel W. Gould, Solyman Russell, William Marsh, Luther Ticknor, Henry Fish, Adonijah Strong, Benjamin Welch, Joshua S. Cornwall, Amasa Kellogg, Benjamin Welch, Jr., John Calhoun, Uriah Turner, John Sears, George Taylor, Jebial Williams, Clark Chapman, Ralph Den- ning, Reuben Warner, Lyman Catlin, Royal Cook, Ives Cowles, William Woodruff, Gaylord Wells, Joel G. Caudee, Roswell Aber- nethy, Frederick B. Woodward, Conant Catlin, Elias Williams, Nor- man Buel, Johnson C. Hatch, Remus M. Fowler, William C. Wil- Hiams, George O. Jones, Erastus Bancroft, H. Scovill, William 0. Talcott, Andrew De Wolf, Wells Beardsley, Howell B. Graham, Miles Belden, Garry H. Miner, Jarvis Case, Amos Beecher, William Erwin, Andrew Abernethy, Paul W. Cluseborough, Eli Reed, William Car- rington, Warren R. Fowler. The following have been admitted since that date: 1828.—Stephen Reed, Jethro Hatch, Bushrod Camp. 1829.—Norman Lyman, —— Hollister, John De Forest, Josiah Barnes, Amos Butler, Jefferson Stone, C. S. Ticknor, A. 8. Lewis. 1830.—Moses A. Lee, Albert Wright, William P. Buel, J. G, Beckwith, Burritt North, Myron Downs. 1831,—George L. Hurd, Theodore C. Hurd, George M. Fowler, Charles Vaill, Edwin C. Ely, L. S. Adams. 1832.—Charles H. Webb, Stanley Griswold, G. H. St. John, Samuel Mc- Alpen, Ambrose Ives. 1833.—Walter Peck, Asahel Humphrey, —— Kibbe, Horace Judson, A. M. Huxley, Ozias Lewis, Albert C. Knight. 1834.—Aaron Wildman, J. R. Eastman, E. D, Hudson, —— Karson. 1835.—Horace K. Beach, Wells Beardsley, Philando Stewart, 1836.—James Barry, Joseph McComb, Elmore Everett, Russell Everett. a * Contributed by J. J. Newcomb, M.D., of Litchfield. 1837.—Samuel T. Salisbury. 1838.—John §. Wolcott, R. Tiffany, Loomis North, Horace Buttolph, Reuben M. Woodruff, W. J. Barry, William B. Lacy, J. A. Gillette. 1839.—George Adams, C. H. Reed, —— Moody, Sylvanus Stewart. 1840.— William W. Welch, Eliada Osborn, —— Perry, —— Platt, —— Freeman, 1841.—Henry Baldwin, William B. De Forest. 1842,—George Seymour, L. 8. Turner, Myron K. Hubbard, Sidney P. Lyman, Charles Byington. 1843.—Baldwin Seeley, Thomas Seeley, William Cockie, Edward P. Ly- man, Joseph North. 1844.—John Stootcote, George Lyman, John Yale. 1847.—W. E. Bulkley, David E. Bostwick, Seth Porter. 1848.—John L. Wakefield, Graham Lee, J, Edward Smith. 1849.—G. 8. Bissell, P. Beardsley. 1850.—William Werden, Ithaneer H. Smith, H. G. Westlake. 1851.—Orlando Brown, Erastmus Hugins, Asahel Catlin, Jr., J. W. Phelps, J. B. Whiting, Seti Pease, John H. Welch, Samuel Catlin. 1852.—Charles B. Maltby, George B. Parsons. 1854.—Henry M. Knight, William J. Burge, Gaylord B. Miller, J. H. T. Cockey, J. W. Bidwell. 1855.—Albin E. Barber, Henry W. Buel. 1856.—John B, Derrickson, 1857.— William W. Knight, William Deming. 1858.— William Bissell. 1859.—Harmon W. Shove. 1860.—Edward Sanford. 1863.—Henry Davis. 1867.—Francis J. Young. 1868.—J. K. Bacon. 1869.—G. W. Bell, J. H. Blodgett. 1870.—J, Morgan, H. E. Gates, William Porter, R. S. Goodwin, T. S. Hanchett, W. S. Munger, C. W. Bull, W. J. Beach. 1871.—Franklin Booth, R. E. Ensign. 1872.—E. B. Heady, L. T. Platt, C. F. Couch. 1873.—T. G. Wright, J. H. North, L. H. Wood. 1874.—F. P. Esterley, C. W. Camp. 1875.—Virgil Buel, J. J. Newcomb. 1876.—J. H. Stevens, A. M. Kessler. 1877._A. G. Heaney, W. L. Barbour, B. 8. Thompson, Samuel H. Hunt- ington, F, W. Brown. 1878.—J. H. Trent, W. P. Swett. 1879.—George K. Roberts, Jerry Burwell, C. L. Blake, Isaac R. Sanford. 1880.—Frederick E. Barrows. LIST OF OFFICERS. The following is a list of presidents and secretaries from 1808 to 1880: PRESIDENTS. 1808, Samuel Woodward; 1809-10, Jesse Carrington ; 1811-13, Nathaniel Perry ; 1814, Jesse Carrington ; 1815-16, Nathaniel Perry; 1817, Jesse Carrington; 1818, William Buel; 1819, Nathaniel Perry; 1820-22, Samuel Rockwell ; 1823, William Buel; 1824, Samuel Rockwell; 1825, Warren S. Fowler ; 1826, Roswell Abernethy ; 1827-29, William Buel; 1830, Roswell Abernethy; 1831, Reuben S, Woodward; 1832, William Buel; 1833-34, Norman Lyman; 1835, Johnson C. Hatch; 1836, Remus M. Fowler; 1837, Samuel Buel; 1838, Gaylord Wells; 1839, Benjamin Welch ; 1840, Samuel W. Gold; 1841, G. H. St. John; 1842, Manley Peters; 1843, Charles Vaill; 1844, Reuben Woodruff; 1845, William J. Barry ; 1846, Harvey Baldwin; 1847, A. M. Huxley; 1848, Johnson C. Hatch ; 1849, Burrit B. North; 1850, Ralph Deming; 1851, James Welch ; 1852, Myron Downs; 1853, S. T. Salisbury ; 1854, Sidney H. Lyman; 1855, William H. Welch; 1856, William Wood- ruff; 1857, George Seymour; 1858, Henry M. Knight; 1859, James Welch; 1860, Henry W. Buel; 1861, J. H. Welch; 1862, D. E. Bost- wick; 1863, C. H. Webb; 1864, J. W. Phelps; 1865, H. M. Knight; 1866, J. W. Phelps; 1867, Henry M. Knight; 1868, J. W. Phelps; 1869, F, S. Young; 1870-71, Henry W. Buel; 1872, J. W. Bidwell; 1873-74, Orlando Brown; 1875-76, Burritt B. North; 1877, William Deming; 1878-79, R. S. Goodwin; 1880, W. 8. Munger. SECRETARIES. 1808-11, Samuel Buel; 1812-15, Elijah Lyman; 1816-18, Conant Catlin; 1819, Erastus L. Heart; 1820-22, Roswell Abernethy ; 1823-25, Ho- ratio Gridley ; 1826-28, Samuel Childs; 1829-30, Samuel Gold; 1831, 50 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. Moses A. Lee; 1832-47, J. G. Beckwith; 1848-49, A. M. Huxley; 1850-54, George Lyman; 1855-57, Henry W. Buel; 1858-59, David E. Bostwick ; 1860-62, G. B. Miller; 1863-66, Henry Davis; 1867-68, J. G. Beckwith; 1869, G. W. Bell; 1870-71, Howard E. Gates; 1872, William Porter; 1873-74, Willis J. Beach ; 1875-77, T. G. Wright; 1878-80, J. J. Newcomb. The following record appears among the proceed- ings of the society under date of April 21, 1828: “A communication from the American Temperance Society was laid before the society, and the following resolution was passed: “¢ Resolved, That this society highly appreciate the exertions of the Temperance Society for the suppression of the deplorable evils under which our country is suffering from the abuse of ardent spirits, and that we will use our best endeavors to further the views of that highly-re- spectable association; and we hereby pledge ourselves that we will at this and at all future nieetings of our society abstain from and discourage the use of that highly deleterious article.’” The present officers and members are as follows: President, Walter S. Munger, Watertown; Vice-Presi- dent, Willis J. Beach, Litchfield; Secretary, J. J. Newcomb, Litchfield; Committee on Membership and Ethics, Henry W. Buel, J. W. Bidwell, Luther H. Wood; Fellows to the State Society, R. 8S. Good- win, G. H. Miner, J. B. Derrickson, Orlando Brown, W. J. Beach. Reporter, L. H. Wood. Members, Henry W. Buel, W. J. Beach, J. W. Bid- well, O. Brown, William Bissell, T. W. Brown, J. Burwell, C. L. Blake, T. E. Barrows, C. W. Camp, C. F. Couch, William Deming, J. B. Derrickson, Myron Downs, H. E. Gates, R. 8. Goodwin, F. P. Esterley, T. 8S. Hanchett, A. G. Heavey, W. W. Knight, E. P. Lyman, G. H. Miner, W. 8. Munger, J. J. Newcomb, J. H. North, Edward Sanford, J. H. Stevens, H. W. Shove, W. P. Swett, I. R. Sanford, B. 8. Thomp- son, James Welch, William Woodruff, L. H. Wood. CHAPTER IV. MILITARY HISTORY. The Second Regiment—The Fifth Regiment—The Eighth Regiment— The Ninth Regiment—The Tenth Regiment—The Eleventh Regiment —The Twelfth Regiment—The Thirteenth Regiment. TuHE lightning had scarcely flashed the intelligence to the expectant North that Maj. Anderson and his gallant band had surrendered as prisoners of war to the Southern confederacy ere the patriotic sons of old Litchfield were rallying to the support of their imperiled country. Men and money were promptly raised, and the record of the county during the whole struggle is one in which her citizens may justly feel a patriotic pride. SECOND REGIMENT INFANTRY. The Second Regiment of Infantry was enlisted for three months and recruited from the volunteer militia, It was mustered into the service May 7, 1861, under the command of Alfred H. Terry, of New Haven, an efficient and accomplished officer. The regiment left for Washington, May 7, 1861, numbering seven hun- dred and eighty. There were.two companies from Litchfield County in this regiment,—infantry com- pany B, Abram G. Kellogg, of New Hartford, captain, Charles W. Morse first lieutenant, and Charles War- ren second lieutenant, and rifle company E, with Sherman T. Cooke as captain, Wheelock T. Batchel- lor first lieutenant, and Charles E. Palmer second lieutenant. The former company was recruited prin- cipally from Winchester and New Hartford, and the latter, except eight men, entirely from Win- chester. The regiment was present at the battle of Bull Run, where both officers and men acquitted themselves with honor. It was mustered out of the service Aug. 7, 1861. THE FIFTH REGIMENT was organized in the summer of 1861, and entered the service with Orris 8. Ferry, of Norwalk, as colonel, He was subsequently United States senator. There was one company principally from this county in the regiment,—Company I,—with G. A. Stedman, of Hart- ford, captain. The first and second lieutenants, W. 8. Cogswell and W. H. Webster, were also from Hartford. The regiment participated in the follow- ing engagements: Winchester and Cedar Mountain, Chancellorsville, Gettysburg, Resaca, Dallas, Mari- etta, Peach-Tree Creek, Atlanta, Chesterfield Court- house, and Silver Run. THE EIGHTH REGIMENT, This regiment was mustered into the service in September and October, 1861, under the command of Edward Harland, of Norwich. Litchfield County was represented by two companies,—C and J. Com- pany C was officered as follows: Captain, Charles W. Nash; first lieutenant, Samuel Glasson ; second lieu- tenant, Robert H. Burnside; sergeant, Henry R. Jones. Company I had for its officers F. W. Jackson, of Danbury, captain; William J. Roberts, of New Milford, first lieutenant; and F. E. Nearing, of Brookfield, second lieutenant. The regiment left Connecticut Oct. 17, 1861, one thousand and twenty- seven strong, and at Annapolis, Md., was joined to Burnside’s corps. “Its earliest services were in the battle of Newbern, N. C., March 14, 1862, and the siege of Fort Macon the following month. It accom- panied Gen. Burnside when he was ordered to join the Army of the Potomac, and subsequently went with the corps into Maryland. At Antietam, in Sep- tember, 1862, the regiment lost: Killed, one officer —Lieut. Mason Wait, of Norwich—and 33 men; wounded, 10 officers and 129 men; missing, 21 men; total, 194. “In December the Eighth was engaged at Fred- ericksburg, but suffered slightly, and in February, 1863, was sent to Southeastern Virginia. In April the regiment was in the fight at Fort Hagar, Va., and remained in Virginia until January, 1864. It then MILITARY HISTORY. 51 returned to Connecticut on veteran furlough, three hundred and ten men having re-enlisted as veterans. In March it returned to its old camp near Portsmouth, Vaz., and, after outpost- and picket-duty at Deep Creek and vicinity, was in the battle at Walthall Junction, May 9th, and lost eighty men. Col. Harland having been promoted to be a brigadier-general, the regiment was at this time in command of Col. John E. Ward, who was severely wounded by a shell at the battle named. A week later the regiment participated in the engagement at Fort Darling, and on the night of the 16th returned within the fortification, the men worn out with eight days’ constant warfare. In this short time the Eighth lost one-third of its fighting strength. Early in June it was engaged with the enemy at Cold Harbor, and from June 16th to Aug- ust 27th in skirmishes and siege-work around Peters- burg, losing heavily. The following four weeks were spent on the James River, picketing the Bermuda Hundred post, and September 27th the regiment lost seventy-three men in the storming of Battery Harri- son. This was the last general engagement of the regiment, which was mustered out Dec. 12, 1865.” The regiment saw severe service, and participated in the following engagements: Newbern, Fort Macon, Antietam, Fredericksburg, Fort Hagar, Walthall Junction, Fort Darling, Cold Harbor, Petersburg, Fort Harrison. There were killed, 72; died of wounds, 40; died of disease, 182; missing, 11. THE NINTH REGIMENT was mustered into the service in the fall of 1861 as the “Irish Regiment,” under the command of Thos. W. Cahill, of Hartford, with Richard Fitzgibbons, of Bridgeport, lieutenant-colonel. It had a few men from this county. Its principal engagements were Baton Rouge, Chackaloo Station, Deep Bottom, and Cedar Creek. Mustered out Aug. 3, 1865. THE TENTH REGIMENT was recruited in the fall of 1861, and mustered into the service during September and October of that year, with Charles L. Russell, of Derby, as colonel, and A. W. Drake, of Hartford, as lieutenant-colonel. There was one company from this county,—Com- pany D,—commanded as follows: Captain, Lewis Judd, of Roxbury ; first lieutenant, Charles H. Hurl- burt, of Roxbury; second lieutenant, Sanford B. Palmer, of Sharon. The regiment left for the seat of war in October, and was assigned to Gen. Burnside’s command. The Tenth received its baptism of fire at the battle of Roanoke Island, where it fought nobly, and its gal- lant colonel, Russell, was killed while leading the charge. “A month later the regiment lost twenty-three killed and wounded in the battle of Newbern, and then had rest from close warfare until the 14th of December. It then participated in the sanguinary battle of Kingston, N. C., and lost one hundred and six officers and men, and only two days later was in another fight at Whitehall. March 28, 1868, after a winter’s rest, the Tenth was in the battle of Seabrook Island, 8. C., and spent the spring, summer, and fall before Charleston. December found the regiment in Florida, where twenty-two men were lost in a fight at St. Augustine. “Tn the spring of 1864 the regiment went to Vir- ginia, and suffered the loss of all the garrison and camp equipage and regimental and company records by the sinking at Norfolk of the transport on which they were stored. Its first fight in the Virginia cam- paign was at Whitehall Junction, May 7th, and from this time the history of the organization shows battle after battle clear through to the surrender of Appo- mattox, the Tenth being ‘in at the death.’ ”’—Battle- Flag Day. A total of 2124 was credited to the organization during its existence, embracing the original 996; re- cruits, 848; re-enlisted veterans, 280. Casualties: Killed in action, 57; died of wounds, 59; died of dis- ease, 152. The regiment sustained a very heavy loss of officers and otherwise. It had four colonels during its first eighteen months of service. The Tenth participated in the following engage- ments: Roanoke Island, sieges of Charleston and St. Augustine, Walthall Junction, Drury’s Bluff, Ber- muda Hundred, Strawberry Plains, Deep Bottom, Deep Run, siege of Petersburg, Laurel Hill Church, New Market Road, Darbytown Road, Johnson’s Plan- tation, Hatcher’s Run, Fort Gregg, and Appomattox Court-house. THE ELEVENTH REGIMENT. This regiment had one company from Litchfield County,—I,—officered as follows: captain, John D. Griswold, of Old Lyme; first lieutenant, P. C. Cum- mings, North Canaan; second lieutenant, William H. Sackett, of Hartford. The regiment was raised in 1861, and December 16th left Hartford for the front, under command of Thomas H. C. Kingsbury, of Franklin. It participated in the following engage- ments: Newbern, South Mountain, Antietam, Fred- ericksburg, Suffolk, near Suffolk, Swift’s Creek, Drury’s Bluff, Cold Harbor, before Petersburg. Total loss of men, 85. THE TWELFTH REGIMENT. The Twelfth Regiment was mustered into the ser- vice in the winter of 1861-62. It had but’ few men from this county. Dr. John B. Welch was assistant surgeon. JOHN BENJAMIN WELCH. John Benjamin Welch was born at Winsted, Conn., Sept. 14, 1888. He commenced regularly the study of medicine with his father at the age of seventeen. 52 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. During the term of his professional study, his time, when not in attendance upon lectures, was divided. A portion of it was spent in the office of his father, and portions of it in the offices of his uncles, Dr. Benjamin Welch, of Salisbury, and Dr. William W. Welch, and Dr. John H. Welch, of Norfolk. He at- tended his first course of medical lectures in Washing- ton, D. C., his second and third at the medical college in New Haven, where he received the degree of M.D., January, 1860. Much the larger part of the two years after his graduation he spent with his father, more or less engaged in the practice of his profession, the last year especially, doing quite as much business as was best for so young a man. He was ardently devoted to his profession, nobly ambitious to excel in it, and eager to avail himself of every opportunity within his reach to fully qualify himself for its responsible duties. On the breaking out of the late Rebellion there arose a demand for surgeons for the army. He pre- sented himself to the Military Board of Medical Ex- aminers for the State of Connecticut, and underwent an examination. He applied for the post of assistant surgeon, for which he was recommended by the board of examiners and by others. He obtained the posi- tion, and received his commission, which was dated Dec. 11, 1861, as assistant surgeon of the Twelfth Regiment, Connecticut Volunteers, then stationed at Hartford. He immediately went to Hartford, signified his ac- ceptance of the appointment, and soon entered upon its duties. The regiment remained in Hartford till Feb. 24, 1862, when it left to join the division of Gen. Butler, at Ship Island. During the voyage he was quite sea-sick in rough weather. On pleasant days he often mounted the wheel-house, and appeared to enjoy very much ocean scenery. On the 6th of March he began to complain of headache and debility. These symptoms, however, excited no serious alarm, as they were attributed to the effects of the sea-sickness ; and it was confidently anticipated that they would disappear on his reaching jJand. The steamer came to anchor off Ship Island at sun- rise, March 7th, when Dr. Brownell hastened to the state-room of Dr. Welch to give him the information and to offer him his congratulations. He requested Dr. Brownell to look at his throat, remarking that it felt sore. Two or three small ulcers were visible, and the next day the rash made its appearance,—decisive symptoms of scarlatina. The accommodations being much better on ship- board than ashore, Dr. Brownell decided that it would be better for Dr. Welch not to attempt to land in the condition in which he then was. Dr. Brownell came off shore to see him daily, and Dr. Fernandez, the surgeon of the ship, was constantly at hand. Dr. George W. Avery, in his letter, says,— “When the steamer ‘Fulton’ dropped anchor in our harbor, I hastened to the wharf to greet your son, my old college friend and professional brother, I was disappointed as to seeing him, and was told by Dr. Brownell that he was slightly ill, and that it would not be advisable to attempt to bring him ashore. Im- mediately I obtained permission of Gen. Phelps to visit him. He was much rejoiced to see me, and I spent nearly all of Sunday afternoon with him. I found a bad pulse; it was soft and small. On Tues- day following, the 11th, I visited him again, and found him, as before, very glad to see me. It had now been decided to send him home, a furlough to that effect having been granted by Col. Deming. I found him so weak that it was with great difficulty that he could speak. He complained very much of his throat.” The late Dr. Eldridge, who preached his funeral sermon, in speaking of his prominent traits, said,— “His intellect was clear, strong, and remarkably well balanced. Endowed with strong common sense and a sound practical judgment, he was peculiarly re- liable, and always proved himself adequate to an emergency. Though modest and unobtrusive, he shrunk not from responsibility, and on several import- ant occasions met and sustained it with a composure, self-possession, independence, and ability that even surprised his most intimate friends. They hardly looked for so much vigor and force in one whose kindness of heart had been deemed his most promi- nent characteristic. He evidently possessed traits that gave promise of the highest distinction as a physician andasaman. His disposition was exceedingly ami- able and affectionate. He was greatly beloved. He soon won a place in the hearts of those who were brought into association with him. “Dr. Brownell says,— ““ His affectionate disposition had endeared him very much to myself. My heart grows heavy as I think of the many dull hours I shall pass in my tent alone, when I had expected to have his pleasant face before me; for I had decided that he and I should have quarters together.’ “Dr. Avery observes in his letter,— “*When your son was a student in New Haven I formed a very strong attachment to him, and have al- ways considered him as a man of great purity of char- acter. I had anticipated much pleasure in having him here.’” Dr. Welch had gained the confidence and the love of the soldiers of his regiment, who deeply deplored his death. His piety was humble, sincere, and un- questionable. He had quarters with the chaplain at Hartford and on ship-board. Rev. Mr. Bradford, the chaplain, mentions a circumstance that was very sig- nificant. He says, ‘‘I have seen Dr. Welch in his private devotions, both in Hartford and on the steamer.” Hence, it is evident that he did not in- tend to be deprived of his communion with his God, though he could not command that degree of retire- ment that he would have desired. He was sincere; MILITARY HISTORY. 53 he had a true, manly independence. How clear it is that he was getting ready for that event which, though then unlooked for, was so near at hand! Such was the young man whom God in his Provi- dence removed from the earth. He summoned into eternity a native of this place, known, esteemed, and beloved by all; he took from the family a beloved and devoted son and brother; he called away from the medical profession a well-educated and promising young physician; he struck from the roll of the United States army a genuine patriot; he took to Himself, from the bosom of the Church here, a sincere, humble, devoted member. “Tt were easy,” says Dr. Eldridge, “to imagine reasons, many and weighty, why the life of such a young man should be prolonged: his promise of use- fulness in his profession and as a man; the comfort and the stay he would have been to his parents; the honor he would have done religion. Oh, how many such things crowd on the mind!” The reasons why God took, though satisfactory to God, are hidden from man. Still it is the Lord that hath done; be content to leave the mystery unex- plained now. You shall know hereafter. Then the affliction is very severe; the sensibilities wounded are very tender; the hopes blighted were very bright; the object taken away was very dear. Yet complain not; murmur not. It is the Lord, your Father, and the Father of him who is gone. “ For God has marked each sorrowing day, And numbered every secret tear, And heaven's long years of bliss shall pay For all his children suffer here.” THE THIRTEENTH REGIMENT was organized in November, 1861, and mustered into the service with Henry W. Birge as colonel, and Alexander Warner as lieutenant-colonel. Only one company was recruited entirely from this county,—C,—officered as follows: Captain, Charles D. Blinn, of Cornwall; first lieutenant, Isaac F. Nat- tleton, of Kent; second lieutenant, Charles E. Tib- betts, of New Milford. Company I was raised prin- cipally from this county, its captain being H. L. Schleiter, of New London. Its first lieutenant, Frank Wells, was from Litchfield. The second lieutenant, Joseph Strickland, was also from New London. The regiment enjoys the distinction of having been in the service longer than any other Connecticut or- ganization. In January, 1864, the Thirteenth, almost to a man, re-enlisted. In the following December it was consolidated into five companies, called “The Veteran Battalion Thirteenth Connecticut Volun- teers.” During the regiment’s long service it participated in numerous hard-fought battles, a few of which are here enumerated: Georgia Landing, Irish Bend, siege of Port Hudson, Cane River, Mansura, Ope- quan, Winchester, and Fisher’s Hill. It was mus- tered out April 25, 1866, and paid off May 5th follow- ing, having been in the service four years and six months. CHAPTER V. MILITARY HISTORY (Continued). TIE NINETEENTH REGIMENT.* THIS regiment was raised during the dark days of 1862, when the glamour of military life had died away and grim-visaged war in all its horror stood out before the people of the country. At the close of Gen. McClellan’s disastrous Peninsula campaign, 1862, President Lincoln called for three hundred thou- sand volunteers, and on the 22d of July a meeting of the citizens of this county was held at Litchfield, and it was resolved to recruit an entire regiment from this county, and the convention unanimously recom- mended Leverette W. Wessells, of Litchfield, for col- onel, and requested the Governor to rendezvous the new regiment at Litchfield. Recruiting immediately commenced, and on the 24th of August nine com- panies had been raised, as follows: Company A was recruited by Wm. Bissell, A. B. Shumway, and C. B. Hatch ; was composed of men from the following towns: Litchfield, 68; Harwinton, 10; Morris, 7; Washington, 5; other towns, 7. Company B, re- cruited by James Hutton and F. A. Cooke: Salis- bury, 48; Kent, 24; Canaan, 7; other towns, 14. Company C, recruited by James Q. Rice and W. T. Spencer: Goshen, 42; Torrington, 34; other towns, 12. Company D, recruited by A. H. Fenn, W. H. Lewis, Jr., and Robert A. Potter: Plymouth, 53; Watertown, 18; Harwinton, 18; Burlington, 1; Morris, 1. Company E, recruited by Jeffrey Skinner, B. F. Hosford, and H. D. Gaylord: Winchester, 62; Norfolk, 16; Barkhamsted, 5; other towns, 7. Com- pany F, recruited by E. W. Jones and James Dean: New Hartford, 3Q; Canaan, 16; North Canaan, 19; Colebrook, 14; Barkhamsted, 9. Company G, recruited by Lyman Teator and George N. Smith: Sharon, 41; Conwell, 34; other towns, 15. Company H, recruited by G. S. Williams: New Milford, 37; Washington, 21; Warren, 5; other towns, 8; Company I, recruited by EliSperry : Woodbury, 61; other towns, 20. Com- pany K was composed of recruits from the different towns in the county. The rendezvous of the regi- ment was at Camp Dutton, Litchfield. .“On the 10th of September the regiment marched to the village to receive an elegant stand of colors from Mrs. William Curtis Noyes, and to listen to a presentation address by her husband, then in the ze- nith of his power and fame. On the 11th the regi- * Compiled and condensed from the excellent “ History of the Second Connecticut Volunteer Heavy Artillery, originally the Nineteenth Con- necticut Volunteers,” by Theodore F. Vaill. 5+ HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. ment was mustered, by Lieutenant Watson Webb, into the service of the United States ‘for three years or during the war;’ and on the 15th, having formed in line and given three parting cheers for Camp Dutton, the long and firmly-treading battalion, con- sisting of eight hundred and eighty-nine officers and men, moved to Litchfield Station, where a train of twenty-three cars stood ready to take them to New York. The journey was a continuous ovation. The deep interest everywhere felt in the ‘Mountain County’ regiment was attested by crowds of people at the stations and all along the railway, and by white hand- kerchiefs and white hands that waved us a farewell and a blessing from window and veranda and hill-top. The good people of Bridgeport and Stamford entered every car without ceremony, and fortified the soldiers with melons and cakes and sandwiches, and with the last cup of real, civilized, cultivated Connecticut coffee that they were to taste for months and years. The next day found us in Philadelphia, that noblest city of America, where we were treated like royal guests, as hundreds of other regiments had been, by the beneficence of her private citizens. At night we slept on the floor of the immense railway station at Baltimore, and the next night in the barracks at Washington, where the government insulted us with coffee that was viler than anything else in the world except the unwashed cups that held it. On the 18th we moved to Alexandria in transports, and bivouacked after dark just north of the city. The line wheeled into ‘column by company,’ and, being informed that that would be their rest for the night, the tired men spread their blankets on the ground, and, with their blue overcoats for a covering and their knapsacks for pillows, were soon deeply and earnestly sleeping their first sleep on the ‘sacred soil,’ all unconscious of the rain that washed their upturned faces. “<«What are they going to do with us?’ was the question in every man’s mind the next morning, as soon as he was sufficiently awake to take his reckon- ing. Would an hour later find us en route for Har- per’s Ferry to join McClellan’s army and take the ‘place of those who had fallen at Antietam only forty- eight hours before? or on board a transport bound for Charleston or the Gulf? Nobody knew. Out came pencils and rumpled paper from hundreds of knapsacks, and behold a bivouac of reporters, all briskly engaged in informing friends at home that we had got so far, but there was no telling where we might be to-morrow. But the order which was to decide our fortunes for at least eighteen months had already been issued, and before night the regiment moved to a pleasant slope about a mile west of Alex- andria which had been selected for a permanent camp ; and it was announced that we were attached to the command of Gen. John P. Slough,* military governor of Alexandria, and that our first actual * Pronounced like “ plow.” military service was to consist in doing patrol- and picket-duty in that city. On the following day we received our first hard bread, and our arms and A tents; and the Nineteenth Connecticut thenceforth had a local habitation as well as a name. “Yes, a name. Alexandria, under martial law ever since the breaking out of the war, had suffered un- speakable things from the troops on duty in her streets or quartered in her environs, and the Alexandrians had come to regard a soldier as a scoundrel, always and everywhere. But the Nineteenth Connecticut had not been a week in Virginia before the self- respecting good behavior of its men became the gen- eral theme, and the authorities were petitioned by the citizens—nearly all of whom were rebels—not to re- move that regiment from Alexandria. “The arms were Enfield muskets. In process of time the men became acquainted with the nomencla- ture and functions of every part of the weapon from bayonet to butt-plate, although at first it seemed wonderful how so awkward and inconvenient a tool could ever have been constructed. Emery paper and crocus cloth were soon brought to bear upon the bronzed barrels, and by the middle of October there were a good many men—the foremost of whom was Pendleton, of Company C—who could use their ‘lock-plate’ or ‘upper band’ for a looking-glass, The A tents were of linen, woven about as compactly as a sieve, and were intended for just five men and no more; and woe to the squad that contained a fat man or one over six feet long, for somebody, or at least some part of somebody, must sleep out of doors. ‘Spoon-fashion’ was the only possible fashion; no man could make a personal revolution on his own axis without compelling a similar movement on the part of each of his tent-mates, and a world of com- plaint besides. Most of the days of that autumn were warm, and even hot; but the chill of night would penetrate the bones of the soldiers and cause them to turn over and over from midnight until dawn, when each company, without waiting for réveille, would rally in a huddle on the long sheet-iron cook- stove at the foot of the street, and endeavor to burn the pain out of their marrows while toasting their bread. “On the 22d of September a detail of five officers and seventy men relieved the patrol of the Thirty- third Massachusetts in Alexandria, and the same was daily furnished during the remainder of 1862. It was the duty of the patrol to move about the city in small squads, or stand guard at theatres and certain other places, and arrest all soldiers who could not produce passes, or who were in mischief, and bring them to the provost-marshal’s office, whence they were usually escorted to the ‘Slave-Pen’ in Duke Street,—a horrible den, with the following sign in large letters over the door: ‘Price & Burch, Dealers in Slaves.’ It had a large room or yard, about fifty feet square, with windowless brick walls fifteen ot MILITARY HISTORY. 55 twenty feet high, a door of iron bars, and no floor except the earth. It had been one of the chief insti- tutions of Alexandria, and any urchin could direct a stranger to the ‘Slave Pen’ as readily as a New York boy can point out the City Hall. “¥rom the soft beds and regular habits of Connecti- cut homes to the hard ground, severe duties, irregular sleep, bad food, and worse water of a Virginia camp was a change that could not be made without loss of health and life. Measles and mumps began to pre- vail, rheumatism made the men lame, chronic diarrhea weakened them, typhoid fever fired their blood, and jaundice painted their skins and eyeballs * yellower than saffron. Two hospital tents were soon filled to overflowing, and an African church near by was appropriated as regimental hospital; while the ‘sick call’ brought to the surgéon’s quarters a daily- increasing crowd who desired medical treatment or an excuse from duty. The first death— that of Daniel E. Lyman, of Company C—occurred on the 2d of November. Corporal Frederick B. Webster, of D Company, followed him on the 6th, and Arthur G. Kellogg, of C Company, on the 10th; and by New Year the number had increased to seventeen. Some of them were embalmed and sent home, and some buried in the soldiers’ cemetery in the southern edge of the city with military honors, which consisted of an escort of their comrades with reversed arms, a roll of muffled drums, the mournful ‘Pleyel’s Hymn’ tremulously executed upon the fife, and a salute fired over the grave, with sometimes a prayer from the chaplain, and sometimes without. “Colonel Wessells, having been taken ill soon after reaching Alexandria, was confined at King Street Hospital during the greater part of the fall, and went home about New Year on a two months’ leave of absence; so that Lieut.-Col. Kellogg had almost un- interrupted command from the time the regiment left Connecticut until the following April. “Company A was sent into the city and quartered at the foot of Duke Street on the 15th of November, to guard the government stores, where it remained until about New Year, when the regiment was trans- ferred to Gen. Robert O. Tyler’s command, which now consisted of the Nineteenth Connecticut, First Con- necticut Artillery, Fourteenth Massachusetts, and a New York regiment, and was entitled the ‘ Military Defenses of Alexandria.’ “Jan. 12, 1863, the regiment moved up the Lees- burg pike, passed Fairfax Seminary, and encamped among the stumps a few rods from the abatis of Fort Worth. The liability of an immediate call to the front was now so far diminished that there was a very noticeable relaxation of military rigor. Dress parade, guard mounting, and camp guard were for some days the only disciplinary duties required, and great was the enjoyment afforded by the respite. Stumps were to be cleared away, and ditching and draining done for a camp and parade-ground, and the change from constant duty under arms to chopping, grubbing, and digging fresh earth was extremely grateful and beneficial. True, the month of January witnessed a greater mortality than any other of the entire twenty months passed in the ‘Defenses,’ but it was the result of disease previously contracted. The improved and improving condition of the regi- mental health is shown in the record of deaths for 1868, which is as follows: January, 16; February, 5; March, 3; April,5; May, 1; June, 1; July, 0;* Au- gust, 1; September, 3; October, 3; November, 2; De- cember, 2. “Fort Worth was a neat little earthwork, situated about a quarter of a mile in rear of Fairfax Seminary, overlooking the broad valley of Hunting Creek and the Orange and Alexandria Railway, and mounting some twenty-four guns of all kinds—Rodman, Par- rott, Whitworth, eight-inch howitzers, and iron and Coehorn mortars. Here the winter was passed. “ After the middle of March a large number of men were daily sent to load cars with wood, several miles out on the Orange and Alexandria Railway, and each man always brought home a stick on his shoulder, so that firewood was no longer dug out of stumps. On the 18th of April orders were received from Gen. Heintzelman, the commander of the Department of Washington, directing the Nineteenth Connecticut Volunteers to be provided with shelter tents and seven days’ cooked rations, and to be held in readiness to march. The regimental pulse was instantly quick- ened. Troops were hourly passing, on their way to join Hooker’s army, and the command to ‘fall in’ and take the ‘route step’ in the same direction was hourly expected. Superfluous property was dis- posed of, and bushels of letters dispatched northward. Capt. Bissell, quite as much excited as any of his men, gave an enormous ham to a squad in Company A, with much the same liberality wherewith a death- doomed voyager flings his gold and jewels about the cabin of asinking ship. But army life is full of va- rious surprises. Troops sometimes unexpectedly go, and sometimes unexpectedly stay. Not only that April, but the next April also, left us still in the de- fenses of Washington. “On the 12th of May the regiment was for the first time broken up into separate garrisons. Companies B, F, and G went to Fort Ellsworth; Company A, to Redoubt A; Company D, to Redoubt B; Com- panies O and K, to Redoubt C; and Companies E, H, and I, to Redoubt D; and this arrangement con- tinued during the summer. These redoubts were small works in the vicinity of Fort Lyon, on the Mount Vernon road, and commanding the land and water approaches to Alexandria on the south. About this time Gen. Tyler was relieved in command by Gen. De Russy, and all the fortifications from Alex- * July, 1863, was the only month of the entire three years in which no death occurred. 56 HISTORY OF LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CONNECTICUT. andria to Georgetown received the name of the ‘De- fenses of Washington South of the Potomac,’ and the troops stationed therein constituted the Twenty- second Army Corps. During the entire season the Nineteenth was called upon for nothing more labori- ous than drilling, target practice, stockade-building in Alexandria, picking blackberries, drinking a quar- ter of a gill of whisky and quinine at reveille and retreat, and drawing pay from Maj. Ladd every two months. Yet a good many seemed to be in all sorts of affliction, and were constantly complaining because they could not go to the front. A year later, when the soldiers of the Nineteenth were staggering along the Pamunkey with heavy loads and blistered feet, or throwing up breastworks with their coffee-pots, all night under fire, in front of Petersburg, they looked back to the defenses of Washington as to a lost Elysium, and fervently longed to regain those bliss- ful seats. O Happiness! why is it that men never recognize thy features until thou art far away? “Col. Wessells resigned, on account of ill health, on the 16th of September. In October the regiment was withdrawn from the redoubts and brigaded with the First Connecticut Heavy Artillery, under the command of Col. Henry L. Abbott. The regimental headquarters were established at ‘Oak Grove House,’ and the companies distributed at three forts,—Ells- worth, Williams, and Worth,—where they remained until the following May. “ About the middle of November, Gen. Barry, chief of artillery of the Department of Washington, re- viewed Col. Abbott’s brigade, and made a particularly careful inspection of the Nineteenth Connecticut; and, from what occurred a day or two thereafter, it was inferred that he bore to Washington a good report of Col. Kellogg and his command, for on the 23d of November the War Department issued an order changing the Nineteenth Connecticut Infantry to a regiment of heavy artillery,* and directing it to be filled up to the maximum artillery standard. This was joyful news. Itdid not take long (for every man was his own tailor) to exchange the faded blue straps and chevrons for bright red, and that soldier could not be accused of overmuch ambition who did not see some chance for promotion among the two majors, two companies, two captains, twenty-eight ‘lieutenants, forty-six sergeants, and sixty-four cor- porals that would be required in addition to those already on hand. Lieuts. Edward W. Marsh and Oren H. Knight were already in Connecticut on recruiting service, and on the 30th of November Lieut. Benja- min F. Hosford, with a party of ten enlisted men, left for home on the same duty. A draft was then pending and enormous bounties were offered for vol- unteers, and these officers and men entered upon their duties with vigor, and achieved a success which, it . * The name of “Second Connecticut Artillery” was given by Governor Buckingham. may safely be said, had no parallel in the history of recruiting during the entire war. The first install. ment—68 men—arrived on the last day of the year; on New Year’s day (1864), forty-four more; fifty on the 6th of January; another lot on the 9th; one hundred and fifteen on the 10th; more on the 17th; and so on until the Ist of March, by which time the regiment had received over eleven hundred recruits, and now contained eighteen hundred men. The new- comers were divided equally among the several com- panies, and the full complement of officers and non- commissioned officers forthwith ordered. It was as- tonishing to see with what celerity a promoted ser- geant would shed his enlisted man’s coat and appear ' in all the pomp and consequence of shoulder-straps and terrible scimitar, and it was for some time a question of serious discussion among the older officers whether the fort gates would not have to be enlarged in order to facilitate the ingress and egress of the new lieutenants who drew such an alarming quantity of water. “ After the resignation of Col. Wessells, the colo- nelcy remained vacant for some time. It was sup- posed that Governor Buckingham hesitated to give the eagles to Lieut.-Col. Kellogg on account of his rude treatment of Maj. Smith a few months before, and a rumor reached camp that a certain unpopular major of the First Artillery was endeavoring to ob- tain this position. A -petition praying that Kellogg might not be thus ignominiously ‘jumped’ was in- stantly signed by nearly every member of the regi- ment and forwarded to the Governor, who thereupon immediately sent him a colonel’s commission. “Tt was about one o’clock on the morning of the 17th of May when an orderly galloped up and dis- mounted at headquarters near Fort Corcoran, knocked at the door of the room where Col. Kellogg and the adjutant lay soundly sleeping, drew from his belt and delivered a package, received the indorsed envelope, and mounted and galloped off again, as little con- scious that he had brought the message of destiny to hundreds of men as the horse which bore him, The dispatch, as nearly as can now be remembered, read thus : “War DepaRTMENT, ADJT -GENL'S, OFFICE, “ Wasuinaton, May 16, 1864. “