poe ai pie fore retreat aia e net at ea ee aeeantess aaa BRN acre = ay Sao CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY i Copyright, 1901 The Music and Hymnody The Methodist Hymnal BY CARL F. PRICE THE METHODIST BOOK CONCERN NEW YORK CINCINNATI Copyright, 1911, by EATON & MAINS First Edition Printed October, 1911 Reprinted June, 1919 Ta fly Father CONTENTS PAGE PRLSCG «.si06 tins ava warp a awd eR eee he en SS Rae wtes oes 7 EMEPOAU OCI ON 2 0:3 sie ¢ ese aun 4 Sue sean ace ate hse oases Gu 8 ee 9 Part I. Tus Hymnay I. The Genealogy of the Methodist Hymnal......... 15 If. The Making of the Hymnal...................-. 30 III. The Completed Hymnal of 1905................. 42 Part II. Tas Hymns IV. The Story of the Hymns...... pdanaiteadvonsuelay naar staan axa 59 V. The Hymn-Writers......... 2... ccc cece ween ees 95 VI. The Theology of the Hymns.................... 129 VII. The Literary Beauties of the Hymng............. 144 Parr IIT. Tas Tons VIII. The Story of the Tunes and their Composers....... 169 IX. The Titles of the Tunes........... 0.000000 e eee 203 X. Descriptive Music.............. 20s eee ene 217 XI. The Formal Elements of the Music............... 233 Parr IV. Practica, Uses or tHe Hymna XII. How to Use the Hymnal......................6. 247 Appendix x; se sessevew gies Seber teehee hewn 4 te eae 283 Index as ik caine seeeersd stn vase we eee eee eee 287 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Charles: Wesleyse.0:csic0 raa2eesuuns eee tener ar Frontispiece FACING PAGE Title-page of John Wesley’s First Hymn Book.......... 15 Specimen Page of John Wesley’s First Hymn Book...... 16 Autograph Letter from Cardinal Newman................ 66 Autograph Copy of Dr. William F. Warren’s Hymn, “I Worship Thee, O Holy Ghost.”.............-..40. 109 PREFACE To present a dictionary of hymnology, or even to collect critical notes upon all of the seven hundred hymns in the Methodist Hymnal, is not the purpose of this little book: for it would be impossible to do this adequately within the limits of space imposed upon our study; and, besides, the more detailed treatment of the hymns (though not of the tunes) has already been ably presented by other hym- nologists of the Church. But as there has often been expressed the need of a brief introduction to the Hymnal, its history, its hymns and tunes, its theology, its musical and literary beauties, together with helpful suggestions to pastors and prayer- meeting leaders—in a word, a practical guide to the Hymnal—this has, therefore, been attempted by the author. Whatever imperfections may mar the work, it is the devout hope of the author that this study may be of some service to the Master’s cause in stimulating a deeper interest in the meaning and use of the hymns and tunes. Hymn-stories are told herein, some of them drawn from the common reservoirs of hymnology, a few re- cited in these pages for the first time, but for the purpose more of suggesting typical conditions under which hymns are written or sung or quoted, than of explaining particular hymns. We beg the indulgence of the Gentle Reader if the 7 8 PREFACE discussion become somewhat technical in a few passages, such as those addressed especially to the versifier, or the musical theorist, or the professional hymnal editor; for each of these classes may find in the Hymnal much material especially worthy of their study. Our acknowledgments are due to many friends, who have given to us valuable assistance; to the sainted Bishop Goodsell, Chairman of the Hymnal Commission, who during winter evenings, most de- lightful and precious in memory, explained to the author many of the beauties of the Hymnal; to Professor C. T. Winchester and to Professor Karl P. Harrington for the story of the preparation of the Hymnal; to Mr. Frederick Schlieder for criticism on the musical sections of the book; to Dr. Charles M. Stuart and Dr. W. F. Tillett, editors of the Hymnal, and to Professor Peter C. Lutkin for helpful letters; to Mr. Dewitt Miller, the owner of the Cardinal Newman manuscript, for permission to use it as an illustration; to Mr. A. S. Newman, whose remark- able hymnological library has been of great assist- ance; to the Methodist Historical Library, where helpful material was placed at our disposal; and to those composers and hymn-writers, whose stories are told for the first time in these pages. The Christian Advocate and the Epworth Herald we also thank for permission to reprint articles upon hymnology by the author, which first appeared in those periodicals, Caru F, Price, New York City, June 1, 1911. INTRODUCTION In the presence of music the meditative soul contemplates a mystery. Music wields powers em- ployed by no other art; for the musical art alone can stir the emotions without depicting objects or episodes such as the representative arts demand as a vehicle for expression. Music speaks directly to the heart. It is the language of the emotions. And perhaps it is because God sometimes speaks directly to the heart of man that the poets have called music “the Divine Art.” But all art is in a sense sacred, and perhaps Carlyle best describes the at- tributes of music when he declares: “Music is a kind of inarticulate, unfathomable speech, which leads us to the edge of the infinite and impels us for a moment to gaze into it.” Whether or not music possesses a divine quality unshared by the other arts, music has become the most helpful of all the arts in the worship of the Divine Father. Said Michael Pretorius: ‘Music, in the opinion of many, ranks second only to faith and religion.” And said Chateaubriand: “Music is the child of prayer, the companion of religion.” With what reverence music was esteemed in the Protes- tant Reformation may be understood from these words of Martin Luther: ‘Next to theology I give to music the highest place and honor. 9 10 INTRODUCTION ‘Music is the art of the prophets—the only art that can calm the agitations of the soul: it is one of the most magnificent and delightful presents God has given us.”’ In quite another sense hymn-writing may be re- garded as a Divine Art, since its theme is divinity itself—since its noblest forms demand nothing short of the highest art. The hymn of praise is almost as ancient as divine worship. Each successive age has employed the hymn for an expression of the most intense spiritual emotion. Moses, the law-giver and God-inspired leader of his people, crowned his won- derful career of achievement with a hymn of praise to Him who made possible all of Israel’s victories. David, the shepherd, the harpist, the great execu- tive and king, the brilliant military general, gave vent to the titanic emotions of his spirit in the most wonderful body of hymns ever written—the Psalms. The Virgin Mary, to whom the angel had whispered the sweetest secret since the world began, pro- claimed the exalted joy of her soul in the Magnificat. The stories of these and other ancient Hebrew hymns are but counterparts of the stories of modern hymns; for out of life have been wrought the best hymns, out of sorrow and soul-conquest, out of joy and revelation. And it is the element of the human soul needs, common to all ages, common to all con- ditions of men, and the all-sufficiency of God to meet every last, deepest need of the soul, that has enabled a hundred generations of men to appro- priate these ancient hymns as their own expression of faith and worship. INTRODUCTION 11 Thus the greatest hymns come to be used by all ages. The psalms of Israel’s camp-fires and the hymn of the Apostles at the Last Supper blend in thought and emotion with the hymns of these later centuries in one grand Hymn of the Race to “Our Maker, Defender, Redeemer and Friend.” When these two divine arts are united—music and hymn-writing—each divine in its own peculiar sense, worship finds its noblest expression, prayer its most beautiful form, and praise its loftiest utterance. In view of the peculiarly sacred office of the singing of hymns, it were sacrilege to employ them either with flippancy or indifference. Indeed, to meditate de- voutly upon the hymns and their music, to study their meaning and message, and to comprehend the purpose of hymn-singing is to intensify one’s rev- erence for music and hymnody. Melancthon, once passing along the street at Weimar with his friends in banishment, heard a little girl singing in clear, sweet tones the great hymn of their beloved leader, Luther: “A mighty fortress is our God,” and at once he exclaimed, “Sing on, little maid; for you little know what hearts you are comforting.” The Church of God knows not what hearts are being cheered, what faith is being stimulated, what souls are being saved by the singing of the sacred hymns of the ages. Those to whom hymn-singing becomes merely perfunctory are apt to forget what a potent 12 INTRODUCTION influence hymns exert upon life, and the motives that control human action. That life which ex- presses itself only in hymn-singing is to be despised. But the life that seeks nobility of achievement often finds its most helpful inspiration in Christian hymns, that sing their truths into the heart of mankind and reécho the divine love-songs of the Eternal Lover of the Soul. PART I ‘THE HYMNAL 13 TEE oe ACROnPodeHT00c29.0C@o6a9 COLLECTION OF PSALMS AND AHAYMNS. aS CHARLES-TOWN, Pcinted by Lawss Tsmotsy. 1737. Title-page of John Wesley’s First Hymn Book, said to be not only the First Hymn Book pubi ished in America, but ‘the First Hymn _Book com- piled for use in the Church of England” CHAPTER I THE GENEALOGY OF THE METHODIST HYMNAL Earty Westeyan Hymnaus—Svuccesstve Hymnats oF THE Mertuopisr Episcopal CHURCH AND THE METHODISD EpiscopaL Cuurcu, SovtH In the light of subsequent ecclesiastical events, it is of peculiar significance to American Methodists that the first hymnal ever published for use in the Church of England was prepared by John Wesley in 1736, and was first printed in 1737 in Charlestown, South Car- olina. John Wesley was then a foreign missionary from England to the distant shores of Georgia. Two striking characteristics of his wonderful career were early displayed in the making of that hymnal: his high hymnodic interest and ability, and his remark- able capacity for work, in that he was able to add to the exacting duties of an active foreign missionary the preparation of a pioneer hymn book. Only two copies of this hymnal are now known to exist. Julian’s “Dictionary of Hymnology” errs in stating that but one eopy is known, and that it is in England; for a copy is now in possession of the Public Library in New York City. This copy, in a good state of preservation, bears upon the title-page the legend: “A Collection of Psalms and Hymns, Charles- Town, Printed by Lewis Timothy, 1737.” The editor- ship and authorship of the threescore and ten hymns are not disclosed, though hymnology has clearly 15 16 MUSIC AND HYMNODY demonstrated this to be Wesley’s collection. The first forty hymns are for use on Sunday, the next twenty on Wednesday or Friday, the rest on Saturday. Not until 1760 was the next important hymnal of the Church of England prepared (by M. Madan), com- posed chiefly of the hymns of Wesley and Watts. During that time Methodism as an active, successful propaganda had become established, though not yet as a separate organized Church; and everywhere the Wesleyan doctrines were being taught effectively through hymns, as well as through the preaching of the Word. Charles Wesley published over fifty books and pamphlets of hymns during his hymnodic career. The particular collection, to which all subsequent Wesleyan Methodist hymnals trace their genealogy, that golden book of Wesley’s that has exerted the largest influence upon Methodism everywhere, was the famous Wesley collection of 1780. This book, as we shall see in another chapter, was retained practically intact by the Wesleyan Methodists as a nucleus for their successive hymnals in the nineteenth century, forming the middle one of three parts, into which the collection naturally divided itself. In the present Wesleyan Hymnal its architecture is still to be traced. One of the most popular Methodist hymnals of the latter part of the eighteenth century in England, though unauthorized by the Wesleys, was the famous “Pocket Hymn Book,” compiled, edited, and pub- lished by Robert Spence, of York, about 1784. Start- ing out as a coachman, Spence had come under the influence of Methodist preaching, and not only became ODES dc OS}06K39.0EIO-G9 es ay: PEARY UES CeUSSR age CESSES SIT SEGHESS PSALMS and HYMNS ~ _ for Sunday. ae Phat XXXIIL ae : E holy Souls, in God rejoice, Your Maker's Praife becomes your V Great is your Theme. your Songs be » Sing of his Name, bis Word, his Way ght Works of Nacure and of | Grace, ee - How wife and holy, jutt and tree ! 2 ‘Jullice and Truth heever loves, And the whole Earch his Goodness proves; 3 His Word the heavenly’ Arches bras g How wide they ‘shire from North to South ~~ And by the Spiricof bis Mouzh 7% ae © Were all the Starry Armies made. 3 Thou gathercft the wide- flowing Seas ; Thofe watry Treafarcs know their Place In the yvaft Srore-hoafe of the Deep + He foake, and g2ve all Nature Birth; And Fices and Seas end Heaven and Earth His everlafting Orders keep- 4 Let Mortals tremble and adore A GOD of fach rehftlefs Power, _» Nor dare indulge their feeble Rzge : ; Vain are your Thoughts and weak your Hands, Byt his eternal Counfc! ftands, ‘And ruics the World from Age te Age - A2 IL Specimen Page of Johu Wesley’s First Hymn Book GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 17 converted, but also started on a new business career that developed him into.a prominent publisher. John Wesley severely criticized this “bookseller of York” for using so many of the Wesley hymns from the 1780 hymnal without permission. Nevertheless, the book continued to gain wider acceptance. That same year, 1784, in America, there assembled the famous Christmas Conference in Baltimore, from which the Methodist Episcopal Church dates its formal existence. Bishop Coke, who was appointed by Wesley to the Methodists in America, was an intimate friend of Robert Spence; and it is not surprising, therefore, that the first hymnal introduced into America after the organization of the new Church was a reprint of the York “Pocket Hymn Book” of Robert Spence. Tis title both in England and in America was the same: “A Pocket Hymn Book, Designed as a Constant Companion for the Pious. Collected from Various Authors.” Its size also was the same, the covers, being five and one half by three and one half inches, and the pages being four and one half by two and one half. The Preface to the American edition states among other paragraphs: ‘We intend to strike off an im- pression of twenty or thirty thousand copies, that the general cry from congregations that they cannot purchase Hymn Books will be stopped. The Hymn Books which have been already published among us are truly excellent. The select Hymns, the double collection of Hymns and Psalms,... . and the Re- demption Hymns display great spirituality, as well as 18 MUSIC AND HYMNODY purity of diction. The large Congregational Hymn Book is admirable indeed, but it is too expensive for the poor, who have little time and less money. The Pocket Hymn Book, lately sent abroad in these States, is a most valuable performance for those who are deeply spiritual, but is better suited to the European Meth- odists. . . . All the excellencies of the former publica- tions are, in a great measure, centered in the present, which contains the choicest and most precious of the Hymns that are to be found in the former editions; and at the same time is so portable that you may always carry it with you without the least incon- venience.” An early suggestion of the benevolent arrangement that has prevailed throughout the history of the Methodist Episcopal publishing house, of devoting the profits of the Concern tg philanthropy, is seen in this paragraph of the Preface: ‘We are the more delighted with this design, as no personal advantage is concerned but the public good alone. For, after the necessary expenses of printing and binding are discharged, we shall make it a noble charity, by applying the profits arising therefrom to the heavy debts of our Churches and Colleges. No motive of a sinister nature has therefore influenced us in any degree to publish this excellent Compilation. It has received the appro- bation of the Conferences.”’ The churches are begged to purchase “no Hymn Books but what are signed with the names of your two Bishops”; and, finally, they are exhorted ‘‘to sing with the Spirit and with the understanding also: and GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 19 thus may the high praises of God be sent up from East to West, from North to South; and we shall be happily instrumental in leading the Devotions of Thousands and shall rejoice to join you in Time and Eternity. We are, Dear Brethren, your faithful Pastors in Christ, Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury.” This, then, was the first official hymnal of the Methodist Epis- copal Church. The General Conference of 1800 in appointing Ezekiel Cooper to be superintendent of the book busi- ness of the Church, authorized him to publish books or tracts, approved or recommended by the Book Committee. The hymnal then in use, not being pro- tected by copyright, was being published also by another concern. For this and probably other reasons a revision was made, and a new hymnal was published in 1802, bearing practically the same title- page, adding a quotation from Psa. 104. 33, and the legend: “Philadelphia, Printed by Solomon W. Con- rad, For Ezekiel Cooper, No. 118 North Fourth Street, near the Methodist Church.’’ The same Preface, as in the preceding hymnal, with slight variations, bears the signatures of Thomas Coke, Francis Asbury, and Richard Whatcoat. The material of the old book is here rearranged and revised, a few hymns added, and “the poetical numbers and measurement of some of the old hymns improved, that, according to the rules of music, they may agree better with the tunes to which they are sung. Also, in place of certain words and sentiments, others are introduced, which appear more proper and harmonious.” 20 MUSIC AND HYMNODY In 1808 another book was added to the hymnal. At the General Conference of this year Ezekiel Cooper resigned, after having increased the assets of the Book Concern from $4,000 to $45,000; and John Wilson was elected his successor as editor and book steward, with Daniel Hitt as his assistant. To this Conference Daniel Hitt submitted a collection of manuscripts, which he had prepared evidently in collaboration with Bishop Asbury, as we find such references in Asbury’s diary as these: ‘August 2, 1807: I have hastily marked above two hundred hymns, taken from the congregational hymn book, to add to a new American edition, which, I hope, will be as good as any extant.” “August 30. The hymns for collection occupied my mind much,” ‘Nov. 3. Both Daniel Hitt and myself preached. Nov. 4. We were diligently occupied with our projected hymn book. 6. We were engaged with our collection of hymns,” etc. At the same Conference James Evans, of New York, made a proposal “for publishing a music book as a standard for the use of the Methodist Churches throughout the United States.” The Committee of Review reported adversely on the tune book, but in favor of publishing the manuscripts of Daniel Hitt as a separate book bound together with the old book, ad- vising, however, the alteration of some of the hymns. This report was adopted two days later. That this revision did not consume much time is evidenced by the fact that the new Supplement was copyrighted September 28, 1808, joining its destinies with the old book, and forming what came to be known as “The GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 21 Double Hymn Book.” The title of the Supplement was ‘‘A Selection of Hymns, from Various Authors, Designed as a Supplement to the Methodist Pocket Hymn Book, Compiled under the direction of Bishop Asbury and Published by Order of the General Con- ference.” Beneath a quotation from 2 Cor. 3. 16 were the words: ‘First Edition, New York, Published by John Wilson and Daniel Hitt, For the Methodist Connection in the United States. John C. Totten, Printer, 1808.” The reason for the change of the place of publication from Philadelphia to New York was that by vote of the General Conference of 1804 the Book Concern had been moved from Philadelphia, where it had become unwelcome, and of the two cities proposed for its new home New York had prevailed by a majority of two. The old Pocket Hymn Book contained 320 hymns, the new Supplement 328. The Preface, unsigned in the first edition, but signed in-some later editions by Francis Asbury and William McKendree, makes this apology for the Supplement: ‘Although we esteem our Hymn Book in present use, among the best, yet in the great and glorious increase of our Church it has been thought defective in size.” The Supplement passed under the review of a committee from each Annual Conference with approbation. It is curious to note in the back of the Supplement the advertise- ment of some of the publications of the Book Concern. The Supplement was also published as a separate volume. In 1821 a new Hymnal, copyrighted October 30, 22 MUSIC AND HYMNODY was “published by N. Bangs and T. Mason for the Methodist Episcopal Church. Abraham Paul, Prin- ter.” Its title eliminated the phrase “Pocket Hymn Book” for the first time: “A Collection of Hymns for the Use of the Methodist Episcopal Church, princi- pally from the collection of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., late fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford.” This Hymnal contained 604 hymns, two doxologies, and a scriptural index. The preface, containing a few of the phrases in previous prefaces, explains the relation of this Hymnal to its predecessor: ‘“The greater part of the hymns contained in the former selection are re- tained in this, and several from Wesley’s and Coke’s collections, not before published in this country, are added. The principal alterations which have been made consist in restoring those which have been altered, as was believed for the worse, to their original state, as they came from the poetical pen of the Wes- leys, for the following hymns were, except a few which have been taken from other authors, composed by the Rev. John and Charles Wesley—names that will ever be held dear and in high estimation by. every lover of sacred poetry.” On February 18, 1836, a fire destroyed the building of the Methodist Book Concern on Mulberry Street, New York city, with a loss of $250,000. Many of the plates of the Methodist publications were totally destroyed, including the Hymnal plates. This neces- sitated a new edition of the book then in use. Dr. Nathan Bangs, the book steward, prepared this new edition, adding a new Supplement. GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 23 When in the year 1844 the question of episcopal rights and its special relation to slavery had hopelessly divided the councils of our Church, and it was deemed wise to the Southern Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church that they should separate and form a Church of their own, a plan was proposed whereby the separation should be consummated regularly and in order. The regularity of the actual division of Methodism into two bodies was not recognized by the Methodist Episcopal Church, however, until 1876, when the bitterness of the lamentable dispute gave way to the affectionate interchange of fraternal rela- tions between the two great bodies of Methodism in America. . In May, 1846, the Southern Conferences met in Petersburg for the first General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, under whose authority the forms of the new Church were perfected. One question which demanded decision was the preparation of anew Hymnal. This was first brought before the General Conference on May 5 by a resolution signed by William M. Wightman and Thomas O. Sum~ mers, which we quote in full, because of its importance as the first officially recorded step toward a Hymnal of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South: Whereas, It is highly desirable that various changes and improvements should be made in a new edition of the Meth- odist Hymn Book, to be published under the authority of this General Conference; therefore, Resolved, That a committee of five be appointed to prepare such a work for publication, as soon as possible, giving in every case the name of the author of the hymn, increasing the number of common, long, and short meters, by selecting 24 MUSIC AND HYMNODY from the authorized Wesleyan Hymn Book, and other ap- proved sources, and excluding some of the particular meters, which are unsuitable for the ordinary congregational singing, introducing into the body of the Hymn Book any valuable hymns not to be found in the Supplement, and dispensing with the remainder and making such alterations in the method and arrangement of the subjects as they may deem ad- visable. Although the resolution was promptly tabled for the time being, it was taken from the table three days later and referred to the committee, which barely escaped being instructed “to report to this Conference within six days what particular meter hymns they propose to exclude’’—an almost impossible. task for a hymnal commission: in the midst of the excitement and work of so constructive a General Conference as this was. The following day, May 9, it was voted by the Conference that the “Committee on Revision and Publication of our Hymn Book be not required to report to this Conference, but that they be authorized to proceed, as soon as may be,’’ to prepare the Hymnal and have it published. On May 23, shortly before the adjournment was taken, the Bishop appointed as a Committee on the Hymn Book, Thomas O. Summers, William M. Wightman, Jefferson Hamilton, White- ford Smith, and Augustus B. Longstreet. The Hymnal which they published was in constant use by the Church until 1886. Efforts were made from time to time to modify or supplant the book. At the General Conference of 1858 a resolution and a memorial asking for a Tune Book were referred to the Committee on Tune Hymn Book, who, with the assent of the General Conference, referred it all to the book agent, book t GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 25 editor, and Book Committee, with instructions to take such steps as were advisable. On May 24 of the 1870 General Conference in the South the Committee on Books and Periodicals re- ported in favor of authorizing the general book agent to publish a hymn and tune book, appointing as a committee to compile the book Dr. J. M. Bonnell, Dr. Thomas O. Summers (one of the signers of the original resolution in 1846), and Dr. W. P. Harrison. This book was intended as an abridgment of the official Hymnal for use in the poorer churches. On May 13 it is recorded that Professor McIntosh (composer of one of our hymn tunes) was introduced by the Bishop to the Conference, and led the Conference in singing “beautiful pieces from the new Hymn and Tune Book, published by order of the General Conference of 1870.” Again on May 24, 1878, the committee reported against the publication of a new smaller Hymnal because of the possibility of an Ecumenical Methodist Hymn Book. A resolution passed, however, the same day, allowing the book editor, the Book Committee, and one bishop at pleasure to publish a small hymn or song book, suited to revival, prayer, and social meet- ings. In 1886 a new Hymnal was authorized to take the place of the old book that had done good service since 1846. The Committee on Hymn Book-reported on May 19, referring to a pan-Methodistic Hymnal, but begging “‘to be excused from further consideration of the subject in the absence of any definite information as to the wishes and purposes of our sister Churches.” 26 MUSIC AND HYMNODY On May 22, however, their report as adopted author- ized the College of Bishops to appoint a committee of nine, to be divided into three equal sections, as was the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal Committee of 1878. This committee was instructed to prepare a Hymnal under these rules: No hymn to be excluded without a two-thirds vote; no hymn not in the Hymnal to be admitted without a two-thirds vote; the numbers in the indexes shall refer to the hymns. It was recom- mended that those hymns be excluded which are rarely or never used in public or social worship, that when it can be judiciously done the long hymns be abridged, and that none exceed twenty-four lines; that particular attention be paid to arrangement and classification of hymns according to subjects; that the whole number of hymns do not exceed 800. This Hymnal, first published in April, 1889, was the book which the present Methodist Hymnal supplanted in the South. It contained, besides 842 hymns, a Supplement of seventy-six sacred songs for use in prayer meetings and Sunday schools. Two years after the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, in their 1846 General Conference had ordered a new Hymnal, the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, meeting in May, 1848, also decided upon a revision. The movement was officially started by the Rev. Dr. James Floy, who on May 2 moved that a committee of seven be appointed to consider the revisal of the Hymn Book, and report if they deemed improvement necessary. This committee, consisting of C. Elliott, chairman, Matthew Simpson, W. Hosmer, GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 27 James Floy, David Patten, G. F. Brown, and Nelson Rounds, reported in favor of the revision, which the Book Committee in New York had joined the official editors in requesting; and the report stipulated that the committee of seven be appointed by the General Conference, that they submit their work for approval to the editors, the Book Committee at New York, and the bishops, and that the expenses of revision be de- frayed by the book agents. One amendment to the report proposed to make a majority of the committee ‘‘traveling preachers in the regular pastoral work,” and, although it was lost, it voiced a feeling still prevalent, that pastors are good judges of what the Hymnal should be. A nominating committee of seven was appointed on May 10, and on May 23 reported the following names for the Committee of Revision, who were elected forth- with: David Dilley, Philadelphia Conference; J. B. Alverson, Genesee Conference; James Floy, New York Conference; David Patten, Jr., Providence Con- ference; F. Merrick, Ohio Conference; Robert A. West, of Brooklyn; David Creamer, Baltimore. This Hymnal was in use for three decades—longer than any other official Hymnal in the history of the Church. No important effort toward another revision was made until 1872, and even then the effort failed of immediate results; for, while the special committee appointed to consider the question, “Ought the Hymn Book of the Methodist Episcopal Church to be re- vised?” reported affirmatively, the General Confer- ence did not adopt its report. 28 MUSIC AND HYMNODY ‘Four years later, 1876, a flood of memorials and resolutions forced the question before the General Conference with better success. On May 4, J. N. Brown successfully presented a resolution that a committee of nine be appointed to consider the pro- priety of revising our Hymn and Tune Books, so as to adapt them more perfectly to general use in all our churches and congregations. The committee, en- larged to twelve, reported on May 19 that a revision was “imperatively demanded,” and that the General Conference authorize the Board of Bishops to appoint a committee of fifteen to be divided into three sections for convenience, and to meet as a whole after each section had completed its assigned work. A two- thirds vote was necessary for the admission of new hymns, or the exclusion of old hymns from the book. The work when completed must needs be submitted to the bishops for their approval, and then a tune book be prepared to fit the Hymn Book. This last proved to be a serious embarrassment to the musical editors, as they were obliged to rigidly follow the order fixed for the hymns, so that some hymns had to be sung to tunes in another part of the book. It was expressly stipulated that no compensation beyond expenses was to be paid to the committee. This was the 1878 book which in the North the present Methodist Hymnal supplanted. A committee of six, the Rev. J. H. Vincent, afterward elected to the episcopacy in 1888, the Rev. J. S. Chadwick, James M’Gee, A. S. Newman, John E. Searles, Jr., and John J. Matthias, was ap- GENEALOGY OF METHODIST HYMNAL 29 pointed by the General Conference of 1884 to make a hymnal for the Sunday schools, and the excellent ‘“EHip- worth Hymnal No. 1’’ was the result. A proposal for an interdenominational hymnal was laid before the General Conference of 1892, urging the Church to join the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, the Baptists, Presbyterians, and Congregationalists in preparing a book for Sunday schools, young people, prayer meet- ings, and revivals; but the resolution came to naught. In the General Conference of 1896 several resolutions failed of passage looking to the publication of an abridged edition of the too large Hymnal then in use. But until the movement which resulted in the present Methodist Hymnal no effective measures were taken to supplant or revise the Hymnal of 1878. CHAPTER II THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL Action of GENERAL CoNFERENCE—First CoMMITTEE— New Joint Commission, NorRTH AND Soura—MusicaL Eprrors Ar the close of the nineteenth century there was a strong feeling that the Methodist Episcopal: Church was in need of anew Hymnal. The old Hymnal had been in use for about a quarter of a century, and while it had served the needs of the Church, and had en- deared itself to Methodists throughout the country, the need for a change was recognized as imperative. The first expression given to this sentiment was a series of memorials and resolutions brought before the General Conference of 1900 from various sources. The result of this movement was Report No. 12 of the Committee on Book Concern, adopted on May 29 as signed by Hon. Leslie M. Shaw, chairman of the com- mittee, then governor of Iowa, and a delegate to the General Conference from the Upper Iowa Conference: Dear FaTHERS AND BRETHREN: Your Committee, to whom were referred certain memorials relative to a Church Hymnal, beg leave to submit the following report: Whereas, The present Hymnal contains a large number of hymns which are rarely, if ever, used, and are therefore un- necessary, and render the book too large and too expensive for common use; and, Whereas, A large number of our churches, especially in small towns and country charges, do not use our Church Hymnal at all, but in its place a variety of unofficial, inde- pendent song books, and which in many cases are pernicious, 30 THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 31 to the damage of the Church spiritually, and of our publishing interests financially; Therefore, there is hereby authorized the preparation of a Hymnal of octavo size, of about six hundred hymns, in which there shall be a small percentage of the best modern hymns and spiritual songs, and also the ritual and order of service of the Methodist Episcopal Church, the same to be sold at the lowest practicable cost. Your Committee further recommend that the Board of Bishops be authorized to appoint a committee of nine to carry out the provisions hereof. The committee of nine was appointed by the bishops in accordance with the resolution, and a glance at their individual records is a convincing evidence that the bishops chose wisely the makers of the new Hym- nal: The Rev. Dr. Samuel F. Upham, the chairman of the committee, had been a pastor in the Providence and New England Conferences, and in 1881 was elected professor of practical theology in Drew Theological Seminary. His death occurred on October 5, 1904, before the deliberations of the Joint Commission were completed. The Rev. Dr. W. A. Quayle, then pastor of Saint James Church, Chicago, and afterward (1908) elected bishop, has long been recognized as one of the most eloquent preachers in American Methodism, as well as a writer of purest literary style. He is one of the very few bishops elected to the episcopacy directly from the pastorate. The Rev. Dr. Charles W. Smith, then editor of the Pittsburgh Christian Advocate, was elected bishop by the General Conference of 1908. He had served many pastorates and a presiding eldership in the 32 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Pittsburgh Conference previous to his election to the editorship, in 1884. The Rev. Dr. Charles Macaulay Stuart was pro- fessor of sacred rhetoric in Garrett Biblical Institute at the time of the revision, after having served as associate editor of the Michigan Christian Advocate and the Northwestern Christian Advocate, of which he is now the editor. The Rev..Dr. Camden M. Cobern, for many years a pastor in the Erie, Detroit, Colorado, and Rock River Conferences, was elected professor of English Bible and philosophy of religion in Allegheny College, 1906. At the time of the Hymnal revision he was pastor of Trinity Church, Denver. Bishop Richard Joseph Cooke, at that time editor of The Methodist Advocate Journal (Chatta- nooga, Tenn.), had been active for years as preacher and pastor, and as professor of New Testament exege- sis and historical theology, and later as vice-chancellor and acting president of Grant University. The General Conference of 1904 elected him book editor of his Church. He has rendered distinguished service on the Commissions on the Federation of Episcopal Methodism, the Constitution, the Ritual, and the Judiciary Committee. The Rev. Dr. Charles S. Nutter, then presiding elder of the Saint Albans District of the Vermont Conference, is well known throughout Methodism as the author of “Hymn Studies,” and as one of the fore- most hymnologists in America. Caleb T. Winchester, L.H.D., author, lecturer, and THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 83 since 1873 professor of English literature in'Wesleyan University, has long been regarded in the literary world and among the colleges as a distinguished authority upon English literature. Matthew V. Simpson, the son of Bishop Simpson, was a business man in Philadelphia. When the committee held its first meeting in New York there existed some doubt as to what the nature of the new Hymnal should be, the wording of the resolution not being explicit on that important point. One party held that the General Conference had authorized only a prayer-meeting book, such as the Epworth Hymnal of 1884, to be used as an abridged form of the general Hymnal. Another party, and strongly in the majority, insisted that the proposed Hymnal was intended to supplant the Hymnal of 1878, and should, therefore, be treated as a revision of that book. Upon one point all were agreed, and that was that the new Hymnal should be much shorter than the old, consisting of about five or six hundred hymns. It was toward a revision of the Hymnal that the committee finally agreed to work, and in their subse- quent meetings they had made great progress to this end, when suddenly their work was halted. Already they had agreed upon a large proportion of the hymns, and had formulated the general plan of the book. On January 16, 1902, announcement was made that the book would be ready for the press in August, and printed by December. It might be interesting, if safe, to conjecture what manner of Hymnal this first com- 34 MUSIC AND HYMNODY mittee would have produced, had their work con- tinued without interruption. Probably the book would have been much shorter than the Hymnal that was finally produced, for their ambition to make a book of only a little more than five hundred hymns could more easily have been attained had they chosen their old hymns from the 1,117 different hymns in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, instead of from two Hymnals, North and South, containing nearly 1,700 different hymns. Then, too, the Hymnal might have had fewer of the American evangelistic type of tunes, which for many years in the Southern Hymnal and its Supplement have been preserved like pressed flowers in an old volume, flowers that are now cherished less for their fragrance than for the memories which they awaken. The reason for the discontinuance of the first com- mission was the discovery that the same General Conference (1900) that had authorized them to pre- pare a new Hymnal had also authorized “prompt steps being taken for the preparation of a common Catechism, a common hymn book, and a common order of public worship, and that other branches of Methodism be invited to cooperate in this under- taking” (Report of the Committee on Federation, General Conference, 1900). In the meantime the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, was also preparing for a common Hymnal. Their General Conference met in Dallas, Texas, in May, 1902. Both of the fraternal delegates from the North referred in their speeches to the common Hym- THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 35 nal. The Rev. Dr. Dewitt C. Huntington said: “We read from the same Bible, we are soon to sing from the same book of hymns, and teach our children the same Catechism. We agree in many things. We differ in few. It would seem that the joint heirs to an in- heritance so sacred, fellow workers under the same system of Christian doctrine, striving for the same goal—a, regenerated world—should be drawn into an ever-deepening fellowship of labor and love.” Lieu- tenant-Governor John L. Bates, afterward governor of Massachusetts, echoed this sentiment in saying that “when steps are taken to prepare a common hymn book and a common order of public worship,” and since other significant events have occurred within the quadrennium just closed, “then the day of the benefits of a practical union, whether one in name or not, is near at hand.” On May 22, the fourteenth day of the General Con- ference, the Rev. Peter H. Whisner, of the Baltimore Conference, moved to suspend the rules and to adopt Report No. 1 of the Committee on Federation. This report breathes the spirit of fraternal regard for the Methodist Episcopal Church, reciprocating the cordial sentiments of its fraternal delegates, and resolves among other things: ‘“That the bishops of our Church are authorized to act in concert with the bishops of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the work of prepar- ing a common Hymnal for public worship, a common Catechism, and a common order of worship, and to proceed as soon as practicable to appoint the com- mittees for the same as agreed upon by the joint com- 36 MUSIC AND HYMNODY mission.” This report was signed by the Rev. P. H. Whisner, chairman, and the Rev. J. P. McFerrin. The conflict of legislation in the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church was referred to the Board of Bishops, and they nullified the appointment of the old commission of nine, at once reappointing the same nine members to the new joint commission, and increasing the representation of the Methodist Episcopal Church to eleven by adding Bishop Daniel A. Goodsell and the Rev. H. G. Jackson. Subse- quently, upon the resignation of M. V. Simpson, J. M. Black was appointed in his place. Bishop Goodsell (1840-1909), as pastor in the New York East Conference from 1859 to 1887, editor of two religious weeklies, and secretary of the Board of Education, achieved the distinction of being one of the most scholarly and brilliant men ever elected to the episcopacy. The Rev. H. G. Jackson has for years been a prominent Chicago pastor. Mr. J. M. Black is well known as an editor and com- poser of gospel songs. Like their brothers from the North, the Southern commissioners were chosen for special qualifications for the work in hand. Bishop Elijah Embree Hoss, D.D., LL.D., formerly president of Martha Washing- ton College, and later of Emory and Henry College, professor in Vanderbilt University, and editor of the Nashville Christian Advocate, was elected Bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, in 1902. The Rev. Dr. George B. Winton has achieved a THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 37 versatile record as pastor in California, missionary in Mexico, professor of Latin in Santa Rosa, and author of Spanish and American works. In 1902 he was elected: editor of the Christian Advocate (Nashville, Tenn.). The Rev. Dr. Horace M. DuBose, pastor of several churches successively in California, ‘Texas, and Missis- sippi, and once editor of the Pacific Methodist Advo- cate, was in 1898 elected secretary of the Epworth League and editor of its organ, the Epworth Era. The Rev. Dr. Wilbur Fisk Tillett, the hymnologist of his Church, and author of many denominational and theological works, has been associated with Vanderbilt University, of which he became in 1886 vice-chancellor and dean of the theological faculty. The Rev. Dr. Paul Whitehead, now deceased, was a presiding elder in the Virginia Conference. The Rev. Dr. John Monroe Moore, pastor of various churches in Texas and Missouri, has been managing editor of the Christian Advocate (Nashville) since 1906. Edwin Mims, Ph.D., author of works on literature, and editor since 1905 of the South Atlantic Quarterly, is professor of English Literature in Trinity College, N.C. é Henry Nelson Snyder, Lit.D., LL.D., after teaching in Vanderbilt University and Wofford College, became president of the latter institution in 1902. The Rev. Dr. F. S. Parker, a member of the Louisiana Conference, is secretary of the Epworth League of his Church, elected in 1908. The Rev. Dr. James Campbell, of the North 38 MUSIG AND HYMNODY Texas Conference, was presiding elder of the Cor- sicana District. The Rev. Dr. Robert Thomas Kerlin served as professor in Missouri Valley College, Southwestern University, and the State Normal School, Warrens- burg, Missouri, and is now instructor in English at Yale University. The two Churches were fortunate in being repre- sented by such a remarkable group of men, who com- bined an alert scholarship and insight into the needs of the Church with a devout sense of the deep spiritual importance of their work. Their proceedings recall the spirit in which Professor Calvin S. Harrington entered upon the work of the Hymnal Commission of 1876-78. In the words of his biography, as related by his wife: ‘He received the appointment as the greatest honor the Church had.ever conferred upon him. Not until after days of prayer and questioning of his fitness did he enter tremblingly, but joyfully, upon the im- portant work. As the days went on, and the labors increased, his enthusiasm grew intense, and absorbed every hour that could be spared from his regular college duties.’ Work of such far-reaching influence is not “to be entered into unadvisedly, but reverently, discreetly, and in the fear of God”; and the commission felt with deep earnestness the burden of its responsibility. That they must prepare a Hymnal to be acceptable to the largest Protestant body in America, to serve the Church possibly for three decades, like its predecessors, }"Galvin Sears Harrington,” by his Wife, Middletown, Connecticut, 1885, THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 39 to meet the needs of two separate Churches, to satisfy the varied tastes of every section and almost every class of people in our land, to give expression to the larger vision of truth and the more tender conception of God and his ways with men, which the Church had gained within a generation, to utter this expression without offense to those who still cling to the older ideas—this seems to have been the symphony, as Channing would have styled it, which the commission purposed to construct, composing a harmonious whole out of the themes of three hundred saintly singers of: the Christian ages, and the melodies of nearly as many composers. With this purpose in view the committee assembled for its first meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, in the spring of 1903. The second meeting was held at Plymouth, Massa- chusetts, during the first week in July, 1903. In all these sessions a devout spirit of industry pervaded the work of the commission, whose brotherly harmony was never once broken, and whose final meeting (in Washington, D. C., January 14, 1904) was a Pente- cost, as Bishop Goodsell reminds us in the Preface. This meeting practically completed the work of choosing the hymns, though there were still a few minor changes to be made. Many of the tunes had been selected at the final meeting in Washington. Those still not chosen were left to the musical editors and the committee on tunes. The minor changes in phraseology were left with the Hymnal editors, the Rev, Dr, Charles M, Stuart for the North, and the 40 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Rev. Dr. W. F. Tillett for the South, both of whom we have already mentioned. The musical editors were Professor Karl P. Harrington, of Wesleyan University, and Professor Peter C. Lutkin, of Northwestern University. Professor Harrington is the son of the late Dr. Cal- vin Sears Harrington, who for many years occupied the chair of Latin at Wesleyan University, now held by his son, only one incumbent having intervened be- tween father and son. Another pleasing coincidence was that Professor Calvin 8. Harrington was one of the two musical editors of the 1878 Hymnal. Born in 1861, Professor Karl P. Harrington since his gradua- tion from Wesleyan, 1882, has been a teacher of Latin, University of Maine and University of North Carolina being two of the colleges he has served. He is well known as an organist, musical director, composer, and lecturer. Professor Lutkin is professor of music in the College of Liberal Arts and dean of the School of Music in Northwestern University. He was born of Danish parents in 1858 at Thompsonville, Wisconsin, near Racine, to which he moved while a young child. At nine years of age he was a choir boy in the Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paul, Chicago, at twelve an as- sistant organist there, and at fourteen, now orphaned, he was appointed organist of the Cathedral. In 1881 he went to Europe, where he studied under the great masters. He has been on the Northwestern University faculty since 1891. The injustice of omitting the names of the musical THE MAKING OF THE HYMNAL 41 editors from the first edition of the new Hymnal, as in early editions of the 1878 Hymnal, was reme- died in later editions. The musical editors and the Hymnal editors met in Evanston, Illinois, in the summer of 1904 to complete the tunes, but the work was still unfin- ished. Before the next meeting a pamphlet was published with the words of several hymns, for which the editors invited new music. The results were discussed by correspondence, and final de- cision was made in the last meeting in Boston, in the spring of 1905. The general editors and mu- sical editors unite in especially commending the work of Professor C. T. Winchester in selecting tunes for the hymns, in addition to the regular work assigned him on the commission. CHAPTER III THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 Tax Boox anp Irs CHARACTERISTICS—COMPARISON WITH Oraer Hymnats—Some SUPERLATIVES Tuus, after years of preparation, the Methodist Hymnal was presented to the Church in September, 1905. It was published simultaneously in uniform editions by the publishing agents of the Methodist Episcopal Church, Eaton & Mains, and Jennings & Graham; and also of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Smith & Lamar. The book ap- peared in two forms, the music edition and the word edition. The former was printed in octavo size, from Gilson music plates made in Boston, the hymns beingin 8-point type, the Psalter in 10-point type. The word edition was printed in 16mo size, both hymns and Psalter being in 10-point type. These editions were presented in various cloth and leather bindings, bear- ing on the back and on the cover the legend in gilt letters, “The Methodist Hymnal.” The most beauti- ful copy of the Hymnal, printed on Oxford India paper and bound in red seal-skin, was presented by Bishop Goodsell, on behalf of the Hymnal Commission, to President Theodore Roosevelt, who acknowledged the favor in pleasing terms. Between the covers of the Hymnal and spread upon the table of its pages, there lies a sumptuous feast of hymns and music, gathered from the fields of many 42 THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 43 lands and many ages, meat and drink for the nourish- ment of the spiritual life, stimulation for sin-sick souls, and refreshment for weary workers. As soon as the book was published widespread com- ment upon so important a Hymnal was at once begun. Much of this was in the form of strong commendation. The higher standards, literary and musical, upon which the Commission proceeded, were indorsed, as well as their taste in matters theological. But from some quarters the comment assumed the tone of ad- verse criticism, futile as such criticism must be, in view of the fact that Methodist hymnals are usually revised only once in a generation. Some of the comments upon the Hymnal illustrated the dangers of irresponsible criticism on church affairs. Many of those who have criticized the book have done so without having acquired any intelligent or intimate familiarity with its contents. At the close of a Sun- day morning’s service in New England, soon after the Hymnal was published, a critic assailed one of the makers of the Hymnal, declaring that he disliked the new Hymnal. When pressed for a reason the only one that he could give was that Fanny Crosby’s hymns were left out of the book. The reply was simple, and revealed the ignorance of the critic. The new Hym- nal contains five of her hymns, whereas there were none in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal. Still others have centered their criticism upon minor im- perfections of the book, made necessary in some re- spects by the very nature of the book as a compromise. They would carelessly condemn the book without 44 MUSIC AND HYMNODY- really understanding its value. A few hours of earnest study would reveal to them treasure-wonders of which they had scarcely ever dreamed. We would not be understood as imputing ignorance to every critic, or to everyone who feels that the Hymnal has not perfectly represented his own tastes. In fact, every member of the Hymnal Commission could probably be included in the latter class, and the writer and perhaps the reader of these lines. The diffi- culty is that each tends to criticize from an entirely dif- ferent angle. The great Methodist Churches, forming the largest Protestant body in America, must satisfy in their forms of worship entirely opposite needs and divergent tastes. When it is remembered that this Hymnal must be used by East and West, South and North, rich and poor, the erudite and the less educated, in the metropolis and in the hamlet, it must be re- garded as wonderful in its adaptability to Methodism at large. One of the most frequent criticisms is that the book contains much more English music and not so much American music as the previous books; and this complaint is urged against the book chiefly by the purveyors of modern gospel music. The indictment is true. The contemporary school of English tune- makers has exerted a predominating influence in the new music of this Hymnal; but so they have also in the hymnals of most other denominations, both in England and in America, and their elevating influence upon church music is constantly rising throughout Protestantism, like an irresistible tide. On the other THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 45 hand, one frequently hears complaints that too many gospel tunes are included in the book. But, when it is considered how few they really are, after all, this criticism seems over-rigorous. To deny entirely the value of the gospel hymns would be to confess one’s unfamiliarity with the history of Methodism. It is true that the average musical standard of the Hymnal is somewhat lowered by this class of music. But surely its place in our social worship is sufficiently important to justify including some of the best of these tunes in the Hymnal. The fact still remains that the collection contains hundreds of the very best hymn tunes in existence, and these criticisms are made only upon a smaller part of the whole. Another favorite diversion of the critic—and in this field his name is legion—is to complain that some old familiar hymn has been set to a different tune from the one to which it was formerly sung. In some in- stances this point is well taken, but in other cases it is influenced largely by the personal equation of the critic. It would be difficult to get a company of such critics to agree as to which are the old familiar tunes that should have been kept in the book. Doubtless the editors had reason for every divorce of a hymn from its tune. Had not such reasons been applied to successive revisions, we should still be singing some of the impossible tunes of the earlier days. We should not be suiting the needs of modern worship to the higher tastes of later generations. From the personal standpoint, however, it is hard to dissociate a hymn from the tune to which we have sung it since child- 46 MUSIC AND HYMNODY hood; and it is not surprising that each successive revision has provoked this comment. In spite of these criticisms the Methodist Hymnal remains as a great collection of the great hymns and tunes of the Church, and as such it is worthy of the loyal appreciation of the Church at large. There are but few members of any General Conference that are entirely satisfied with every clause of the Discipline. But they cheerfully and loyally accept it as the ulti- mate result of many forces, some of them contending in opposite directions, but all of them together pro- ducing a higher wisdom; and under the new Dis- cipline they loyally return to their various fields of labor for another quadrennium of work. Like- wise, the Hymnal should be adopted by every Methodist society as the only authorized hymnody and music for our Chureh. Perhaps the most exact method of reaching a just estimate of the Hymnal is to compare it with other American hymnals in the same field. In the first place, comparing it with its predecessors in both North and South, the Hymnal is distinctly an ad- vance in musical, literary, and theological standards. Nor could the Church expect anything other than an advance in all of these respects. Besides, by the arrangement of the material, it marks a decided im- provement over the former books. Just how far the editors have culled their material from the old Hymnals of the Methodist Episcopal Church and the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, may be seen from the following statistics: THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 47 In the new Hymnal there are 717 hymns (exclusive of the doxologies, chants, and occasional pieces). They are set to 773 tunes, 216 being duplicates and 557 being different tunes. Of these 773 tunes, 198 in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal were sung to the same words as in the new. 140 in the old Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal were sung to the same words as in the new. 105 are tunes from the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, set to old words, to which other tunes were used in the old book. 4 132 are tunes from the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal, set to old words, to which other tunes were used in the old book. 45 are tunes from the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, to which new hymns have been set. 46 are tunes from the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal, to which new hymns have been set. 213 are tunes not in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, but are set to hymns that were in the old book. 190 are not in the old Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal, but are set to hymns that were in the old book. 212 are tunes not in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal and are set to words not in the old book. 265 are tunes not in Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal, and are set to words not in the old book. 773 773 In each of the old Hymnals there were only seven hymns set to more than one tune; but the new Hym- nal contains two tunes for each of fifty-five hymns, be- sides three tunes for each of the two hymns, J. G. Hol- land’s ‘‘There’s a song in the air” and Charles Wesley’s “Jesus, Lover of my soul,” 48 MUSIC AND HYMNODY In the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal there were 483 tunes (79 being duplicates, leaving 404 different tunes), to which 1,117 hymns were set. In the old Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal there were 696 tunes (239 being duplicates, leaving 457 different tunes), to which 918 hymns were set. The new Hymnal has decreased the number of hymns (by just 400 from the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, by 201 from the Hymnal of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South), and has increased the number of different tunes (by 153 over the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, by 100 over the Hymnal of the South). In only one instance in the new Hymnal, namely, the two hymns to the tune “America,” are two adja- cent hymns set to the same tune, although nearly half of the hymns in the Hymnal of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, and more than half of those in the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal were adjacent to some other hymn set to the same tune. Frequently in both of the old books the words were placed on a page opposite the tune. This does not occur in the new Hymnal. Nor is the congregation in singing any hymn obliged to turn over to some other part of the Hymnal for the music of that hymn, as was true of fifty- two hymns in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, but of only one hymn in the Hymnal of the Meth- odist Episcopal Church, South. In a word, each tune is printed with its hymn, and each hymn with its tune. This has made it possible in every instance (save in “America,” cited above) to insert the first verse of each hymn between the clefs of the music, to THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 49 which it is to be sung—a distinct gain in this Hymnal over its predecessors. Comparing the Methodist Hymnal with other American hymnals, no one would claim for this Hym- nal that it excels ail others in the high standard of its music. Undoubtedly other hymnals, especially those of the Protestant Episcopal Church, as the Hutchins, Parker, or Tucker hymnals, maintain throughout a higher average of music. As we have already observed, the musical average has been somewhat lowered by admitting a small number of hymn tunes especially adaptable to evangelistic work. But as most of our tunes coincide with those in the best hymnals, and as many of our new tunes are of a high order, the musical difference is not great. What is best in the best hymnals is to be found in our own, to which has been added a certain desirable adaptability to our own needs, entirely lacking in the other hymnals. There is no question that in theology our Methodist doctrinal teachings are better set forth in the Method- ist Hymnal than in any other American hymnal. In fact, one of the great dangers to our system of religious education lies in the fact that so many unauthorized hymnals are used in the Church that either teach that which we do not regard as Methodist belief, or else portray the Christian life in false colors by means of weak, sentimental phrasing of little literary and less theological value. The Methodist Hymnal has found a peer in the excellent book of our Methodist brethren in England, 50 MUSIC AND HYMNODY known as “The Methodist Hymn Book.” To this book, more than to any other in existence, our Hymnal bears a close relation in the fact that both have been historically derived from the original collection of the Wesleys, and in the possibility that eventually both may be merged into one pan-Methodistic hymnal. The centripetal force, that is more and more uniting all denominations throughout Protestantism, has made itself felt throughout the several branches of Methodism. The Ecumenical Methodist Conference, first convened in London, September, 1881, has been the best expression of this Wesleyan unity. At the third Ecumenical Conference, held in London, Septem- ber, 1901, a resolution was presented authorizing one common hymnal for international Methodism, This is a step in advance of the Church of England and the Protestant Episcopal Church, which use entirely dif- ferent hymnals. The idea has strongly appealed to Methodists on both sides of the sea; and in view of — the possibility in the future of an international hymnal we feel justified in quoting from the report on the pro- posed resolution, adopted on September 9, 1901: The Business Committee regards the suggestion of the resolution with sympathy and trusts that at some future day it will be realized; but, having regard to the fact, first, that several Churches in the Eastern section have recently pub- lished new hymn books, and thereby incurred great financial responsibilities; secondly, that arrangements for the publica- tion of a new hymnal by the Methodist Episcopal Church are in an advanced stage; thirdly, that the Wesleyan Methodist Church has decided to publish a new hymn book, which it is hoped will also be adopted by the Irish New Connection, Wesleyan Reform Union, and Australian Methodist Churches, and having regard to the legal and financial difficulties in- THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 51 volved in the proposal, the committee is of the opinion that the proposal contained in the resolution is not at present practicable. Whether or not the time will ever come when we shall be constrained to join hands across the sea in making one hymnal for all English-speaking Method- ists, it is of interest for us to know what manner of hymn book is used by British Methodism. “The Methodist Hymn Book with Tunes’ is the official title of the book. The title-page bears the statement that the music has been edited by Sir Frederick Bridge, M.V.O., Mus.Doc., King Edward Professor, University of London, and for years organ- ist of Westminster Abbey. His works are much studied in this country by students of harmony, and he is regarded as one of the foremost musical scholars in Great Britain. Twenty-nine hymn tunes in his book attest his ability as a composer in this simple form. The Preface contains the genealogy of the English Methodist Hymnal. The last Wesleyan Hymn Book with Supplement had been issued in 1875, and two years later a tune book was published to conform to thishymn book. This was “‘the first official tune book in the history of British Methodist psalmody, in which hymns and tunes were printed together on the same page,’’ says the Preface to the present edition. The Wesleyan Conference of 1900 appointed a com- mittee to cooperate with other British Methodist bodies in preparing a new hymn book, “to cover the whole ground of our Wesleyan Methodist worship, 52 MUSIC AND HYMNODY doctrine, and experience, and that the substance of Wesley’s original hymn book, with certain modifica- cations, would find its fitting place in the central por- tion of the book, which deals with the offer of the gospel and the history of Christian experience.” In 1901 a new committee, including laymen, was ap- pointed, who carried the work through to a successful completion in 1904, and presented to the Wesleyan Methodist Church, the Methodist New Connection, the Wesleyan Reform Union, and the Methodist Church of Australasia, a common Methodist Hymn Book, uniting them for the first time through the same songs of the religious life. This English Hymn Book contains 981 hymns, set to 893 different tunes, besides ten ancient hymns and canticles with several musical settings for each, and thirty-nine supplemental tunes in the Appendix, commonly known as “old Methodist tunes.’’ Many of the tunes are not confined to one page. Sir Arthur Sullivan’s magnificent anthem setting of Croft’s “St. Anne” covers four pages, and his “Lux in Tenebris” two and a half pages, the music for each separate verse being printed in full. For the first tune of “Dies Trae’’ an ancient plain-song melody is used, covering six pages; to which is added a second tune of a page and a half. Thus upon perusing the book, one is im- pressed with its ample provisions, filling almost double the number of pages of our own Hymnal, exclusive of the Psalter. The Wesleyan Church makes use of a much larger body of the Wesley hymns than has the American THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 53 Church. Of the three hundred hymns omitted from the old book in England about one hundred were Wesley’s; and still one half of the new Hymn Book consists of hymns by Charles Wesley (437) and John Wesley (29), much over three times the number of Wesley hymns used in America. This has been true because John Wesley’s own society in his own land is privileged to gaze more intimately into his devout ’ face and In those clear, piteous, piercing eyes behold The very soul that over England flamed.! For generations his England has taken pride in pre- serving almost intact the book of the two Wesleys. Even when the omission of some of the Wesley hymns seemed necessary, the Wesleyan committee proceeded upon the principle that before a Wesley hymn be ex- cluded they must have a good reason for its exclusion, rather than insisting upon a good reason for retaining it, thus placing the burden of proof upon the plaintiff. To the half hundred Wesley hymns thus retained, and about two hundred other hymns, also endeared to the Wesleyan Church, have been added a fine body of nearly three hundred hymns, only one of which had never been published before in any book. These hymns have been arranged in much the same order of subjects as fixed by Wesley. The center of the book contains the body of Wesley hymns, preceded by hymns of adoration, and followed by hymns for children, sacrament, and festivals national and philanthropic. Dr. Stephenson has commented upon "John Wesley,” by Richard Watson Gilder. 54 MUSIC AND HYMNODY this in his sketchy critique of the hymn book, and has pointed out that the lack of worship-hymns by Wesley is rooted in the fact that the Anglican Church had turned out the Methodists from the formal places of worship.” There are many differences in the text of the same hymns, as used in England and America, due to alterations from the original made by both Churches, but more especially by the Americans. Our hymn, ‘Weep not for a brother deceased,’’ they have retained in its original form, “Rejoice for a brother deceased,” to which our Joint Hymnal Commission, after hours of debate, nearly changed our hymn. Some verses of the same hymn are often used by one Church, and not by the other. Our hymn, “There’s a wideness in God’s mercy,” begins thus in the Wesleyan Hymn Book: “Was there ever kindest shepherd.” Many such examples of these differences, caused by altera- tion and omission, could be cited, were it within our province. ‘These hymns have been set to a splendid collection of tunes, one half of them being new to the Wesleyan Church, but only a few of them never having been published before. The Conference instructed the committee to select the tunes in the first instance, and then submit them to the editor “for criticism or alterative suggestion,” retaining, however, the final authority within the committee. The committee professes to have observed the canon that the tunes must be such as the people can and will sing. The 18ee Dr. T. B. Stephenson's article in Christian Advocate, July 14, 1904. THE COMPLETED HYMNAL OF 1905 55 editor expressed his ideal thus: “I would like this tune book to be the finest in the world’; and from the musical standpoint he has approached this ideal. To our comparison of the Methodist Hymnal with other hymnals there remain to be added briefly the superlatives; for in some points at least our American Methodist collection is unique. In the first place, on the mechanical side, the mammoth edition of 576,000 in which the Methodist Hymnal made its first appear- ance in 1905 was the largest first edition of any mer- chantable book ever issued in America. It is the first official hymnal adopted by the Meth- odist Episcopal Church and the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. Since the Methodists form the largest Protestant body in America, and the Roman Catholics do not gen- erally use congregational singing in their worship, the Methodist Hymnal has been adopted for more millions of members than any other official hymnal in America, and probably in the world. Of all hymnals in use it is undoubtedly the best suited to the theological beliefs of American Method- ism in this age. Musically, it surpasses all of its predecessors, and is the most adaptable to our nation-wide needs of all the high-standard hymnals now in use. PART II THE HYMNS 57 CHAPTER IV THE STORY OF THE HYMNS EXPERIENCES WHICH LED TO THE WRITING OF THE Hymns— EXprRIENCES IN THE USE oF THE Hymns Every hymn has a spiritual background in the personal experience of its author. As all literature is an expression of life, even so true hymns are the ex- pression of an individual spiritual life, though their sentiments be adapted to universal Christian experi- ence. It isnot given to us to know the inner conflicts, the secret strivings of the soul, or the peculiar joys of each hymn-writer, that may have inspired the writing of our great hymns. Many a line, that is sung coldly or thoughtlessly, has been poured into poetic form from the molten metal of the soul’s furnace. Of the real story of most of our hymns we shall never know until the final day when all secrets are revealed. A few of the sacred poets, however, have taken us into their confidence as to the writing of their hymns, while of the lives of still others we know sufficient to determine the state of mind which produced their hymns. It is impossible within the compass of a few pages to relate more than a few of the many stories that have clustered about these seven hundred hymns. Therefore those which are here presented have been chosen chiefly to illustrate different types of experience which have stirred men to hymnodic expression. The conversion of a soul from sin to righteousness 59 60 MUSIC AND HYMNODY has inspired the writing of many a strong evangelistic hymn. The supreme joy of the new birth and the ecstasy of freedom from sin have been frequently caught up into song from the deepest emotions of the poet’s soul. Joseph Hart, the author of “Come, ye sinners, poor and needy,” had fallen away from a godly life. His sin was made more hideous to him because of the memory of the lost experience of Christian joy and peace. The very tortures of his conscience kept him from returning to the throne of grace, until, finally contemplating the sufferings of Christ, he yielded his life anew and for all time to the Saviour. With the joy of a returned prodigal he wrote: Let not conscience make you linger, Nor of fitness fondly dream; All the fitness he requireth Is to feel your need of him, and another verse also clearly referring to himself: Come, ye weary, heavy-laden, Bruised and mangled by the fall; If you tarry till you’re better, You will never come at all. Henry Kirke White, who at the age of eighteen wrote “When, marshaled on the nightly plain,” and died within two years afterward, might have re- mained a skeptic until his death but for an intimate friend, R. W. Almond, later rector of Saint Peter’s, Nottingham. After Almond became a Christian he shunned White as a dangerous companion, and when White complained of his studied absence Almond told him the reason. With horror and resentment White THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 61 replied, ‘““Great God! you surely think worse of me than I deserve!’ But into the blackness of that experience and his consequent conviction of sin there shone the Star of Bethlehem, and in this hymn the youthful poet sings of the Star as his guide through raging seas, where Deep horror then my vitals froze, Death-struck, I ceased the tide to stem, until at last the ship of his soul was “‘safely moored, my perils o’er.” Charles Wesley, many of whose hymns were directly autobiographical, was at his best in singing of the work of redemption as he had felt it. Immediately after his conversion in 1738 he wrote the hymn beginning: And can it be that I should gain An interest in my Saviour’s blood? In one verse he sums up the whole wonderful story: Long my imprisoned spirit lay, Fast bound in sin and nature’s night; Thine eye diffused a quickening ray, I woke, the dungeon flamed with light: My chains fell off, my heart was free, T rose, went forth, and followed thee. This is thought to be the hymn mentioned by John Wesley in telling of his own conversion at ten o’clock in the evening, after which they went to Charles’s room in Little Britain, where ‘‘we sung the hymn with great joy, and parted with prayer.” Charles Wesley had a fondness for observing anni- versaries in a devout fashion. He always wrote a hymn upon his birthday. And so it is not strange 62 MUSIC AND HYMNODY that one of his greatest hymns was written upon the first anniversary of his conversion, May 21, 1739. These words, beginning “O for a thousand tongues to sing,” have become so endeared to all Methodists that they have formed the first hymn in all the important Methodist hymnals in Great Britain and America. The very first phrase is said to have been suggested by the remark of Peter Bohler to Wesley in praise of Christ, ‘Had I a thousand tongues, I would praise Him with them all!’ The line, ‘’Tis life and health and peace,” is suggestive of Wesley’s serious sickness mentioned in his own account of his conversion in the home of one Thomas Bray: “I was composing myself to sleep and quietness and peace, when I heard one come and say, ‘In the name of Jesus of Nazareth, arise and believe, and thou shalt ‘be healed of all thine in- firmities!’ The words struck me to the heart. I lay musing and trembling. With a strange palpitation of heart, I said, yet feared to say, ‘I believe, I believe!’”’ When at last he won the consciousness of sins for- given, he prayed, and then read from the Bible this passage: ‘He hath put a new song in my mouth,” which sentiment is echoed in the line, ‘’Tis music in the sinner’s ears.”” Then, as the flood of memory of this great day sweeps over him on its first anniversary, he exclaims: He breaks the power of canceled sin, He sets the prisoner free; His blood can make the foulest clean? His blood availed for me. Count Nicolaus L. Zinzendorf, the Moravian preacher, is said to have been converted through THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 63 ‘beholding and meditating upon the famous painting, “Eece Homo,” in the Disseldorf Gallery, portraying Christ’s bowed head crowned with thorns. Something of his intense vision of Christ’s sufferings is caught in John Wesley’s translation of Zinzendorf’s hymn be- ginning: “Jesus, thy blood and righteousness” (148). Its relation to his own salvation the author sings in our fourth verse: Lord, I believe thy precious blood For me, e’en for my soul was shed. The fact that this hymn was written upon a voyage from the West Indies to England early in the year 1739 makes. more interesting his references to the ocean in the last verse: : . : : were sinners more Than sands upon the ocean’s shore, Thou hast for all a ransom paid. The joy of seeing a whole houseful of friends con- verted in answer to her prayer, while on a little visit of five days to Areley House, led Frances Ridley Haver- gal to write (348): Take my life, and let it be Consecrated, Lord, to thee. Of this she said: “The last night of my visit I was too happy to sleep, and passed most of the night in praise and renewal of my own consecration, and these little couplets formed themselves and chimed in my heart, one after another, till they finished with, ‘Ever, only, all for thee.’”* Her method of work she once 1From “ Frances Ridley Havergal,” by the Rev. E, Davies, p. 61 and p. 40. id 64 MUSIC AND HYMNODY described thus: ‘Writing is praying with me, for I never seem to write even a verse by myself, and feel like a little child writing: you know a child would look up at every sentence and say, ‘And what shall I say next?’ ” Similarly, Mrs. Elizabeth Codner, hearing of many wonderful conversions through a revival in Ireland, wrote in 1860: “Lord, I hear of showers of blessing,” in order that her unconverted friends, to whom she sent the verses, might utter as their own prayer, “Even me, even me!” In contrast to the joy of the soul’s conversion, now and then is heard a note of anxiety, lest the paths of sin lure the soul away from God. The Rev. Robert Robinson’s “Come, thou Fount of every blessing” con- tains a passage which, in the light of his later life, speaks eloquently of his conflict of soul: Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it, Prone to leave the God I love. Years after he wrote this, when he had drifted into frivolous ways, a stranger once quoted the verses to him; and full of emotion he replied: “I am the un- happy man who composed that hymn, many years ago, and I would give a thousand worlds, if I had them, to enjoy the feelings I then had.” “Lead, kindly Light, amid th’ encircling gloom,” is a prayer for divine guidance in the midst of the gloom of spiritual perplexity. Whether or not it was written on a ship becalmed for a foggy week in the Straits of Bonifacio, between Corsica and Sardinia, as some have THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 65 told us, surely and eloquently it reveals the author’s hesitant, beclouded state of mind and spirit at this period of his life. A minister of the Church of Eng- land, Dr. John H. Newman, had become anxious because of the spiritual indifference in his own Church. In his recent visit to the Continent, and more especially in Rome, from which he was now returning, he had felt more strongly than ever before the lure of Romanism, which, finally, a decade later, led him to enter the Roman Catholic Church, and still later to become cardinal in 1879. “The night is dark, and J am far from home’ expresses his spiritual unrest, if not homesickness for old England. “One step enough for me” was the guiding principle of his progress during those dark years. The whole second verse is biographical in regretting that willfulness which he confesses in other verse written earlier upon this visit to the Continent: Time was I shrank from what was right, For fear of what was wrong. Such dread of sin was indolence, Such aim at heaven was pride. * * s s So, when my Saviour calls, I rise, And calmly do my best. But through it all there shines the faith of the great soul that “thy power,” the guide of wandering souls, “will lead me on’ till “the night is gone.” Cardinal Newman denied the authorship of the fourth verse of 66 ‘MUSIC AND HYMNODY “Lead, kindly Light,’”’ sometimes attributed to him. The accompanying illustration reproduces this denial. in his own handwriting, aihenehe it is uttered in the third person. The intensity of spiritual sridtion that impelled Cardinal Newman to write this wonderful hymn we can scarcely begin to understand. ‘Dr. Ray Palmer says of the writing of his hymn, “My faith looks up to thee’: “I gave form to what I felt by writing with little effort the stanzas. I recollect I wrote them with very tender emotion, and ended the last line with tears.” Fanny Crosby thus relates the story of writ- ing one of her hymns: ‘‘While I sat there that evening the line came to me, ‘Rescue the perishing, care for the dying.’ I could think of nothing else that night. When I arrived at my home I went to work at once, and before I retired the entire hymn was ready for a melody.” The chastening, humbling influences of illness bring the truly consecrated soul nearer to God. Miss Katherine Hankey had passed through a severe illness of many months, and was still in helpless weakness, when she wrote, ‘Tell me the old, old story.”’ Thus from the heart she exclaims: For I am weak and weary, And helpless and defiled. How naturally the convalescent’s mind dwells upon That wonderful Redemption, God’s remedy for sin. The hymn, “Father, whate’er of earthly bliss,” was written by Miss Anna Steele during an illness. The Jan’ S. (80) begs & wferre Aa flew 4. Map burn Kab Bn foarte Stony a add?) G oe Aeidly bight "a now 4 Ls and atl frkh no lace f mh , and heat om hed temm-— - Sl am ce, Ke awh Zz th had trA,, ran yror hey Locher , us Sletel Autograph letter from Cardinal Newman, disclaiming his author- ship of the fourth stanza of “Lead, Kindly Light” THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 67 poem, entitled. “Desiring Resignation and Thankful- ness,” originally began thus: When I survey life’s varied scene Amid the darkest hours. , It is the Christian sufferer who is singing in the lines: Give me a calm, a thankful heart, From every murmur free. The words and music of “Tell it out among the nations’’ were written by Miss Frances Ridley Haver- gal in Wales during a severe illness, as she was listening to the church bells calling to service. The theme was suggested by a phrase she had just read in her Prayer Book, “Tell it out among the heathen that the Lord is King.” From her own weariness that Sabbath morn- ing she sang, el it out among the weary ones what rest he gives.” Something of the inspiration through Sympatty with sickness and its hallowing influences may be gleaned from Richard Baxter’s quaint note to his hymn, “Lord, it belongs not to my care ;” for he added this line: ‘‘This Covenant my dear Wife in her former Sickness subscribed with a chearful will. Job 12. 26.” The sense of the certainty of approaching death arouses no terrors in the heart of the Christian, who yearns for the homeland. The Rev. Thomas R. Taylor was warned of the disease that must soon claim his life. But, undaunted by the prospect, he wrote that hymn of heaven: I’m but a stranger here, Heaven is my home. 68 MUSIC AND HYMNODY , One line, “Short is my pilgrimage,’ was all too prophetic, for he died at the age of twenty-seven. But so heroic was his fight in the Master’s cause during those last months in the valley of the shadow of death that James Montgomery was thereby inspired to write our hymn, “Servant of God, well done.” Charles Wesley wrote, “(Who are these arrayed in white?” as a eulogy upon his parents shortly after their death. Under mortal shadow was written the great hymn for the dying Christian, ‘Abide with me,”’ by the Rev. Henry Francis Lyte, minister to Brixham, Devonshire, England. The disease of consumption had over- taken him past the half-century milestone of his active life, and the doctors had insisted that he leave for Italy. On his last Sabbath in his old parish, Septem- ber 5, 1847, against the protest of his friends, he preached and administered the sacrament of the, Lord’s Supper. The effort nearly exhausted him, but after resting in the afternoon he was able to walk at twilight all alone by the sea. Here on this walk the thoughts of his coming departure from England and probably from human life came thronging upon his mind, and in that hour of hallowed devotion he conceived the hymn: Abide with me! Fast falls the eventide, The darkness deepens—Lord, with me abide! When other helpers fail, and comforts flee, Help of the helpless, O abide with me! The verses, “Swift to its close ebbs out life’s little day,” and “Hold thou thy cross before my closing THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 69 eyes,” reveal his sense of impending death; but with what courage and faith it was blended is proven in the lines: Where is death’s sting? where, grave, thy victory? I triumph still, if thou abide with me. The next day he started for the Riviera, which he never reached, for in less than eleven weeks he died in Nice, November 20, 1847. The last poem of Charles Wesley’s was composed and uttered upon his deathbed. Being “in feebleness extreme,” he called to Mrs. Wesley and asked to write down these lines, which he dictated: In age and feebleness extreme, Who shall a sinful worm redeem? Jesus, my only hope thou art, Strength of my failing flesh and heart; O, could I catch a smile from thee, And drop into eternity! A hymn that has comforted many a soul at the threshold of heaven is “One sweetly solemn thought,” about which Miss Pheebe Cary, who wrote it, once said: “T composed it in the little back third-story bedroom, one Sunday morning, after coming from Church.” The hallowed thoughts of the sanctuary were woven into the noble poem. Thus we have considered a few of the hymns that have voiced intense spiritual experiences, largely in- duced‘ by subjective causes. Frequently, however, some external cause, some critical event, some calam- ity has revealed to the poet an undreamed vision of divine truth; and with a new sense of his relation to 70 MUSIC AND HYMNODY God he has poured forth his heart in the living lines of an exalted hymn. The calamity of blindness in banishing physical light from the afflicted has often opened to the soul new flood-gates of spiritual light. ‘Come, O my soul! in sacred lays” was written by a blind man, the Rev. Thomas Blacklock. It is not strange that his con- ception of heaven was of a place of ineffable, eternal light, as we see in the second verse (23) : Enthroned amid the radiant spheres, He glory like a garment wears; To form a.robe of light divine, Ten thousand suns around him shine. In the hymns of Fanny Crosby, the aged blind singer, is expressed this same pathetic yearning for light. In one hymn she prays: ‘‘Lead me through the vale of shadows” (332); in another (490): Till my soul is lost in love In a brighter, brighter world above. In “Blessed Assurance”’ (548) she sings of F perfect delight! Visions of rapture burst on my sight. Likewise the blind English clergyman, William W. Walford, sang of the vision of his heavenly home (516): . . Sweet hour of prayer, May I thy consolation share, Till from Mount cma lofty height, I view my home. The story is told, though not without question, that the great scholar and preacher, George Matheson, was at one time betrothed to marry a young woman, THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 71 when the physicians one day told him that his long- fought disease of the eyes must soon result ‘in total blindness. In a spirit of love and frankness he told her of his impending sorrow, of his great love for her, but of his willingness to release her from her promise, if she so desired. Her decision to break the engage- ment only intensified his sorrow, and might have driven him to despair, had he not cast himself upon the love of Christ, and found the divine relief which he so pathetically expresses in his hymn: O Love that wilt not let me go, I rest. my weary soul in thee; I give thee back the life I owe, That in thine ocean depths its flow May richer, fuller be. O-Light that followest all my way, I yield my flickering torch to thee} My heart restores its borrowed ray, That in thy sunshine’s blaze its day May brighter, fairer be. Of the writing of this hymn Matheson said: “I was sitting alone in my study in a state of great mental de- pression caused by areal calamity. My hymn was the voice of my depression. It was not made for utili- tarian purposes; it was wrung out spontaneously from the heart. All the other verses I have written are manufactured articles; this came like a dayspring from on high.” A grief similar to George Matheson’s was suffered by Joseph Scriven, whose betrothed was drowned shortly before the day fixed for their wedding. The intense sorrow, into which his joy was so suddenly changed, 72 MUSIC AND HYMNODY only drove him closer to the Divine Friend; for he wrote: What a friend we have in Jesus, All our sins and griefs to bear! So universally true and helpful is the sentiment of this hymn that it has been printed nearly ten million times. The hardship of imprisonment in the Convent of Saint Marie, Paris, 1686, in Vincennes, 1695, and in the Bastille, 1698-1702, was imposed upon Madame Jeanne Marie Bouviers de la Mothe Guyon, because of her religious beliefs. Nor was this hardship any less, since her child had died, her own beauty had been blighted by smallpox, her mother-in-law had turned against her, and severest criticism had been passed upon her creeds by many theological leaders. In what spirit this leader, of the Quietist movement and friend of Fénelon bore her tribulations we may know from her lines: My Lord, how full of sweet content I pass my years of banishment! Helen Maria Williams was a resident in Paris when the Bastille fell in 1789, and she was imprisoned in the Temple as a foreign suspect until the death of Robes- pierre. Her reliance upon divine help during these days of anxiety is expressed in her hymn, ‘While thee I seek, protecting Power.” It was immediately after all of Isaac Watts’s property had been destroyed by fire that he wrote, ‘Come, sound his praise abroad.” In the line, ‘‘We are his works and not our own,” he acknowledges that all that we are and have belongs to THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 13 God. Such Christian philosophy makes our material losses seem trivial. To a sensitive soul the misunderstanding of noble motives brings a keenness of pain, rarely suspected by the accusers. Every evening at twilight Mrs. Phoebe Hinsdale Brown stole away from her four children to a grove near by for prayer and meditation, because in their poverty they were living in an unfinished house in Ellington, Connecticut, with a sick sister in the only finished room. To the gossipers, who for this daily absence persecuted her with false accusations, she re- plied in the lines, T love to steal awhile away From little ones and care, which, modified, and shortened, has become our hymn (498). The virulent opposition that the Wesleys met in preaching anew the doctrines of regeneration by faith is hard to understand in this day of free speech. Churchmen called them ranting enthusiasts or secret Papists. Hardened sinners reviled them, Some- times they were stoned by the mob, sometimes ar- rested by the authorities. On one occasion a man kept interrupting Charles Wesley’s sermon with vile epithets and mockery. At last Wesley silenced him with a scathing denunciation of the man’s sin. The sermon proceeded, and the divine message won the hearts of many in the audience. Upon retiring from the meeting Wesley wrote, “Jesus, the name high over all’ (222). Very different were the emotions of the Rev, Dr, 74 ’ MUSIC AND HYMNODY John Faweett when he produced his most famous hymn, ‘‘Blest be the tie that binds.” Having re- ceived, in 1772, a call to leave his charge in the Bap- tist church of Wainsgate to become pastor of a large London church, he was about to go when his people, broken-hearted, besought him and finally persuaded him to remain, though his personal property was all ready for shipment. He said to them, “You may unpack my goods, and we will live lovingly together for the Lord.” Thus came to be written the great hymn of Christian unity; for he had learned that “When we asunder part, it gives us inward pain,” and henceforth both pastor and people decided to “Share our mutual woes, Our mutual burdens bear,” throughout the rest of life. Just as orators have arisen in the might of their eloquence to command the thought of some great occasion, even so our sacred poets in their purpose to stir the emotions and direct the thought of some great religious gathering have sometimes produced hymns that have outlived the occasions for which they were written—occasions that are now remembered only because of their hymns. Such a hymn is the Christmas song, ‘‘Hail to the Lord’s anointed,” written by James Montgomery for a gathering of the British Moravians on Christmas Day, 1821. “Jesus, where’er thy people meet,” was written by Cowper upon the occasion of the removal of the prayer meeting at Olney to another building. “Lord, while for all mankind we pray,” was composed in 1837 as an English national anthem by the Rev. THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 15 John R. Wreford at the time of Queen. Victoria’s coronation. Dr. John James Bonar, of Saint Andrew’s Free Church, Greenock, was accustomed to print a little memorandum for each communion service in his church. For one of these he asked his brother, Dr. ‘Horatius Bonar, to write a hymn; and for this coming Sabbath was written, in two days, the hymn for the Lord’s Supper, ‘Here, O my Lord, I see thee face to face.” “Thou, whose unmeasured temple stands,” by William Cullen Bryant, owes its existence to the dedication of a chapel on Prince Street, New York, in 1835. In its original form it began, ““O Thou, whose own vast temple stands.” The most popular Ameri- can poet of his times was asked to write a hymn of dedication for the Hanover Street Church, Boston, and the result was the lines beginning, ‘“The perfect world by Adam trod,” by. Nathaniel P. Willis. “Saviour, again to thy dear name we raise,” by the Rev. John Ellerton, was produced in 1866 for the Parochial Choirs Festival at Nantwich, Cheshire; and ‘Forward, be our watchword,” was written in June, 1871, by Dean Henry Alford for the Tenth Festival of Parochial Choirs of the Canterbury Diocesan Union. Dean Shipley, of Saint Asaph, was about to preach a missionary sermon on Whitsunday, 1819, for the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. The day before, he asked his son-in-law, Reginald Heber, rector of Hodnet, to write “something for them to sing in the morning.” In a very short time he completed the great hymn ‘From Greenland’s icy mountains,” which was sung the next morning. 76 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Dr. Samuel Wolcott’s “Christ for the world we sing” also owes its birth to a missionary occasion, though in this instance it was written after the meeting, Febru- ary 7, 1869, from which the writer was returning alone through the streets when these lines came to him. In his own words the story is told: “The Young Men’s Christian Association of Ohio met in one of our churches with their motto in evergreen letters over the pulpit, ‘Christ for the World and the World for Christ.’ This suggested the hymn, ‘Christ for the world we sing.’ ” Similarly, it was immediately after a conference- room talk on the twenty-third psalm, and while still in the spirit of the occasion, that the Rev. Joseph H. Gilmore, in 1861, wrote, “He leadeth me,” in the home of a friend in Philadelphia, where he was visiting while supplying a Baptist pulpit in that city. A legend, containing only the three words “Sleeping in Jesus,” inscribed on a tombstone in the cemetery of Pennycross Chapel in Devonshire, led Margaret Mackay to write for The Amethyst of Edinburgh the beautiful funeral hymn, ‘‘Asleep in Jesus.” The poetic inspirations derived from nature, stirring the human soul and suggesting divine truth, have not left hymnology wholly uninfluenced. The stars, the sea, the earth with its mountains, hills, plains, and rivers, its flowers and birds, winter storms and har- vests of “full corn,” with the “bright blue sky” above it—all these are portrayed within our Hymnal, and evidence the poets’ visions of beauty in nature. We are told that Isaac Watts wrote his hymn of heaven, THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 7 “There is a land of pure delight,” while in South- ampton, England, and that his view of the Isle of Wight across the River Itchen suggested the familiar lines: Sweet fields beyond the swelling flood Stand dressed in living green; So to the Jews old Canaan stood, While Jordan rolled between. The South of England is pictured in another hymn, “Lo! on a narrow neck of land,” which Charles Wesley is said to have written at Land’s End in Cornwall. Some have maintained that this hymn was written upon a foreign journey, but even so, it must have been reminiscent of Land’s End, which Wesley had fre- quently visited. We have already referred to the tradition which attributes much of the imagery of “Lead, kindly Light,”’ to the scenes upon a voyage on the Mediter- ranean. More trustworthy is the narrative concerning Joseph Addison’s hymn. Returning from the terrors of a voyage on the Mediterranean Sea, he gives us from his own recent experiences a picture of the Christian traveler’s gratitude in his hymn, ‘How are thy servants blest, O Lord!” which is embodied in his essay on “The Sea,” in the Spectator, No. 489, in 1712. The second verse describes the hardships through which he had safely passed: In foreign realms, and Jands remote, Supported by thy care, Through burning climes they pass unhurt, And breathe in tainted air. 78 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Again in a description of the retiring .storm he says: The storm is laid, the winds retire, Obedient to thy will; The sea, that roars at thy command, At thy command is still. It was the same vivid memory of travels in Pales- tine a few months before that enabled Bishop Phillips Brooks to touch our imaginations in his exquisite Christmas hymn, so that we almost behold the very birthplace of Christ, as we sing: O little town of Bethlehem, how still we see thee lie! Above thy deep and dreamless sleep the silent stars go by; Yet in thy dark streets shineth the everlasting Light; — The hopes and fears of all the years are met in thee to- night. Dean Arthur P. Stanley’s O Master, it is good to be : High on the mountain here with thee, was written after his visit in 1853 to Palestine. Of. Bishop Ken’s “Evening Hymn” Theron Brown says, “The ‘Evening Hymn’ drew scenic inspiration, it is told, from the lovely view in Horningsham Park at ‘Heaven’s Gate Hill,’ ”’? while the author was walking to and from church in the twilight. Still another night scene, portrayed in hymn lines, was the night glow in the sky from the great fires of the Newcastle Collieries, which Charles Wesley was visiting, in order to preach to the colliers. Likening this to the gospel fires, he sang: See how great a flame aspires, Kindled by a spark of grace! 1“The Story of the Hymns and Tunes,” by Theron Brown and Hezekiah Butterworth. mS THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 79 Jesus’ love the nations fires, Sets the kingdoms on a blaze: To bring fire on earth he came‘ Kindied in some hearts it is:: O that all might catch the flame, All partake the glorious bliss! The stone quarry in the Isle of Portland was a great industry, peculiar to the town where he was preaching at the time, that suggested a hymn to Charles Wesley. Before preaching to the quarrymen he wrote: Come, O thou all victorious Lord, Thy power to us make known; Strike with the hammer of thy word, And break these hearts of stone, a figure of speech that must have stirred the imagina- tions of the workmen. Not all the interesting stories of our hymns center about their origin; for with the use of the hymns thousands of thrilling memories are associated, recall- ing scenes when the quoting or singing of a hymn has stirred the deepest emotions of the soul. Could the hymns in our Methodist Hymnal recite the story of all the deathbeds they have cheered, what a wonderful testimony to the faith and fearlessness of the dying Christian would be told! Isaac Watts wrote (in hymn No. 581): Jesus can make a dying-bed Feel soft as downy pillows are, While on his breast I lean my head, And breathe my life out sweetly there. In many a Christian home where this miracle has 80 MUSIC AND HYMNODY been wrought, there are cherished among the tender- est memories Those sweet, fervent hymns Made sacred by how many saints of God, Who breathed their souls out on the well-loved tones. The story is sometimes repeated in the writer’s home of the last words of Great-grandfather Miller, whose saintly life was crowned with a triumphant death. Surrounded by his sorrowing family, his dying request was that they sing his favorite hymn, “There is a fountain filled with blood.” But so great was their grief they could scarcely sing, and when they reached the end of the fourth verse, “‘And shall until I die,” their voices broke down. Then, gathering up what little strength he had left, he sang the last verse alone: “Then in a nobler, sweeter song, I'll sing thy power to save, When this poor lisping, stammering tongue Lies silent in the grave.” And with these words his body fell back, while his soul took up the nobler, sweeter song. One of the earliest accounts of a hymn being sung by a departing Christian relates to the death of the Venerable Bede, on May 26, in the year 735. He re- quested his sorrowing friends to carry him to that part of the room where he had always prayed; and there he sang the Gloria Patri, beginning with feeble voice, “Glory be to the Father,” and continuing until with his last breath he uttered, “world without end.” Many Methodist saints, who have been canonized a By Richard Watson Gilder. t THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 81 at least in the affections of the Church, have expressed by some hymn the joy of passing to the larger life. John Wesley, the day before he died, sang the first two verses of Watts’s old hymn: I'll praise my Maker while I’ve breath, And when my voice is lost in death, Praise shall employ my nobler powers. Bishop Hedding, who died in New York, April 29, 1852, spoke in his last words of the ineffable joy of fifty years of service for the Master. “I want to tell it to all the world!’ he exclaimed. ‘“O, that I had a trumpet voice! ‘Then would I tell to sinners round What a dear Saviour I have found.’ ” Dr. Nathan Bangs in his last illness quoted the third verse of our hymn (371):, The promised land, from Pisgah’s top, I now exult to see: My hope is full, O glorious hope! Of immortality. Bishop Matthew Simpson, shortly before his death, in 1884, quoted this verse: O, would he more of heaven bestow! And when the vessels break Let our triumphant spirits go To grasp the God we seek ; In rapturous awe on him to gaze, Who bought the sight for me; And shout and wonder at his grace, To all eternity. The last line he repeated over and over again. His last audible words were, “Yes! yes! glory be to Jesus!’’ 82 MUSIC AND HYMNODY A most pathetic but appropriate use of an old, familiar hymn is the story of the deathbed of the Rev. Thomas Stockton. He had fallen into a sleep, which his sorrowing friends thought was his last. But just before he died, he awakened, looked upon them and said: “And are we yet alive, And see each other’s face?” Many a statesman or leader in public life, humbled to pass through the same way we all must tread, has departed this life with hymns of faith upon his lips. Thus Cobden died, repeating John Wesley’s hymn: “What though my flesh and heart decay? Thee shall I love in endless day!” Prince Albert, Queen Victoria’s royal consort, in his last moments quoted “Rock of Ages,” and President McKinley uttered lines from ‘‘Nearer, my God, to thee,” as he was dying; and each of these hymns echoed throughout the two brother Anglo-Saxon nations. Wordsworth’s daughter was comforted at the approach of death by the hymn, ‘Just as I am,” which had been repeated to her every morning for two months previous. Jerome of Prague, marching to his execution, sang: “Welcome, happy morning.” Sometimes a poet on his deathbed has been com- forted by the lines of a hymn written by himself. The Rev. Sir Henry Williams Baker, as he was dying on February 12, 1877, spoke in clear, hopeful tones a part of his own hymn on the twenty-third psalm, THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 83 “The King of love my Shepherd is,”’ which bears these lines: In death’s dark vale I fear no ill With thee, dear Lord, beside me. His last words were, “And on his shoulder gently laid, And home, rejoicing, brought me.” Likewise, Frances Ridley Havergal at the very close of a life of tender, courageous witnessing for the Mas- ter, sang a verse of her hymn, which begins, ‘Golden harps are sounding”; and after a convulsive sickness she whispered, “There, now, it’s all over,’ as the “Pearly gates were opened” for her soul. Dr. George J. Stevenson’s volume, “The Methodist Hymn Book and Its Associations,” is a treasury of the triumphant dying words of godly men and women who were Wesleyan Methodists in England, Among these are some fourscore hymns in our own collection, from which lines of triumph and faith have been uttered in the dying moments of the devout. How clearly and tenderly our hymns, even those not classed as hymns of heaven, express the thought and sentiment of that solemnly joyful hour of death may be seen from such phrases as these, each well accepted as the last words spoken or sung by some Christian. They are here arranged in logical order: Teach me to die, that so I may Rise glorious on the judgment day (49). Then pain Is sweet, and life or death is gain (335). 84 MUSIC AND HYMNODY But there’s a nobler rest, above (73). In death as life be thou my guide, And save me, who for me act died (333). Happy, if with my latest breath I may but gasp his name (222). Into thy arms I fall (268). The clouds disperse, the shadows fly} The Invisible appears in sight, And God is seen by mortal eye (298). The opening heavens around me shine With beams of sacred bliss (535). And angels beckon me away, And Jesus bids me come (624). Our shelter from the stormy blast, And our eternal home (577). There all the ship’s company mee Who sailed with the Saviour a (594). There we shall see his face, And never, never sin (22). Through all eternity to thee A grateful song I'll raise (105). These, and many, many other similar passages, have cheered a host of departing pilgrims, and will long be remembered as The hymns with which they passed away from earth In long-gone centuries, that backward sweep. The great variety of conditions under which hymns have been used as prayers is remarkable. The writer never so fully realized the power of a hymn, uttered in prayer, as upon one summer morning } From “ Alma Vista,” by Lebbeus Harding Rogers, THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 85 near Intervale in the White Mountains. We paused ut a farmhouse to inquire the way up the mountain. An old, old man opened the door, his head crowned with thick, snow-white hair, his face a benediction of goodness. When he had told us the way we inquired if he knew the great Guide to the heavenly road. His answer was the story of his life in brief, a life devoted to the Master’s service in preaching, teaching, and living the gospel. Before we continued our tramp he asked us to kneel with him to pray, and with an in- finite earnestness, and in every phrase a strange pathos and power, he poured out his heart in the lines: When I survey the wondrous cross On which the Prince of glory died. All four verses he recited, and this alone was his prayer, one of the most eloquent petitions we had ever heard. An ancient Methodist illustration of the effective use of hymns in soul-winning was the conversion of Sarah Baker, of Tiverton in England, while after his sermon, Mr. Rouse, a local preacher, was reading the line, ‘This is the time, no more delay.” Instances of conversions such as this are the most practical argu- ments in favor of the time-honored custom of reading hymns before singing, in order to more deeply impress the thought of the words. Similarly, the Rev. Samuel Wesley’s hymn, “Behold the Saviour of mankind,” while being read at a love feast, led Owen Davis, a Welshman, to accept the atonement of Christ, and, yielding his life to the Master’s service, he became one of John Wesley’s effective preachers. The original manuscript of this hymn, no copy being then in exist- 86 MUSIC AND HYMNODY ence, was almost miraculously saved by being blown out of the window during the fire that burned the Epworth Rectory to the: ground, August 24, 1709. Sometimes by reading a hymn in private, a soul has been awakened to conviction and repentance. Thus a Walkeringham teacher, William Morris, was con- verted by reading the lines beginning: ‘Stung by the scorpion sin,” in the hymn, “Let heaven and earth agree.” In the quietude of family devotions, John Watson, of Yorkshire, joined in the singing of ‘“Wel- come, sweet day of rest.’”’ The lines, One day amidst the place Where my dear Lord has been Is better than ten thousand days Of pleasurable sin, became engraved upon his conscience, and, retiring to solitude, he gave his heart and life to God. Dr. Stevenson at one time compiled a record of two hundred souls who had been converted at various times during the singing of ‘‘Arise, my soul, arise.” He also tells the story of a young man, a leader in social gayety, who had been persuaded by a friend to attend a Bible reading. Retiring to a saloon for revelry to stifle his conscience, he was haunted by the lines sung at the meeting: Come, Holy Spirit, heavenly Dove, With all thy quickening powers; Come, shed abroad a Saviour’s love, And that shall quicken ours. He soon left the house, and sought the pardon of God. The wife of the Rev. John Shipman, a Wesleyan minister, attributed her conversion to the influence of . THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 87 the hymn, ‘Come, let us anew our journey pursue,” as sung at a Watch-night meeting in Aberdeen, Scot- land, when she was a girl. It was through the singing of Isaac Watts’s hymn, “Alas! and did my Saviour bleed,” that the evangelist E. P. Hammond was converted at the age of seventeen in Southington, Connecticut. Dr. Duffield’ tells us of a sailor fearing the approach of death, and having no Bible to comfort him, remembered at last the hymn line: ‘For he was slain for us.” Then, recalling the rest of the hymn, “Come, let us join our cheerful songs,” he found divine acceptance. Other instances he gives us. During a frightful storm the Rev. Andrew Kinsman was dining with a young man, whom he had met in company with the great Rev. George Whitefield. Quoting to him the lines, “The God that reigns on high, And thunders when he please,’’ Kinsman added, “This awful God is ours, Our Father and our Love”} and this led to the young man’s conversion, Dr. Spencer, in “Pastor’s Sketches,” relates a young woman’s conversion to the singing of the hymn, “How sad our state by nature is!” early in one of his Sabbath services. Her mind seized upon the lines, A guilty, weak, and helpless worm, n thy kind arms I fall, until finally she believed and trusted the Saviour. “T"English Hymns,” by Dr. 8S. W. Duffield. 88 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Fanny Crosby (Van Alstyne), the blind poet, five of whose hymns are in our Hymnal, in telling the story of her conversion, says that during a revival in the old Thirtieth Street Church, New York, in 1850, several times she had sought the Saviour at the altar; but not until one evening, November 20, did the light come. “After a prayer was offered they began to sing the grand old consecration hymn, ‘Alas! and did my Saviour bleed,’ and when they reached the third line of the fourth stanza, ‘Here, Lord, I give myself away,’ my very soul flooded with celestial light.” Again, as in her hymns, the blind singer uses here the figure of light to represent salvation and eternal life. The good ship Rothsay Castle was wrecked between Liverpool and Beaumaris in 1831, and nearly a hun- dred people were drowned. James Martin, a class leader from Liverpool,, was clinging to a plank, from which several had dropped into the sea, when suddenly those near by heard, in his voice: “The God that rules on high, That all the earth surveys, That rides upon the stormy sky, And calms the roaring seas. “This awful God is ours, Our Father and our Love, He will send down his heavenly powers To carry us above.” After thus fearlessly facing death, he was rescued with a score of others. Professor Dempster, of the Garrett Biblical In- stitute, and a company of missionaries on their way to South America were chased for three days by a THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 89 pirate ship. As the pirates approached, the ship’s company went on deck, and all of them sang to the tune of “Old Hundred”’: “Before Jehovah’s awful throne, Ye nations bow with sacred joy? Know that the Lord is God alone, He can create and he destroy.” While they were kneeling in prayer the enemy lay by, near the side of their vessel, then turned about, and sailed away. John Wesley, about to preach in the market place at Chesterfield, was haled before a magistrate. But before going he said to his congregation, “Friends, sing a hymn while I am gone; I shall soon be back.” And then he gave out the hymn: Why should the children of a King Go mourning all their days? In a short time, while they were still singing over the hymn, he returned triumphant. A remarkable story is told by Dr. Duffield of the hymn, “All hail the power of Jesus’ name.” The Rev. E. P. Scott, while a missionary in India, started out, contrary to the pleas of his friends, to visit a distant tribe of murderous mountaineers. Upon first seeing him the natives pointed their spears at his heart. Expecting instant death, he brought forth his violin, and played while he sang with closed eyes, ‘‘All hail the power of Jesus’ name.” When he came to the verse, “Let every kindred, every tribe,” he opened his eyes to find their attitude wholly changed. This was the beginning of two years and a half of blessed service 90 MUSIC AND HYMNODY in preaching Christ and teaching this tribe to “crown him Lord of all.” One of the most dramatic settings for the singing of a hymn was the occasion upon which King George of Tonga formally proclaimed his nation to be hence- forth Christian, granting to them a Christian constitu-. tion. Five thousand natives on Whitsunday, 1862, assembled about their king, sang the hymn (631): Jesus shall reign where’er the sun Does his successive journeys run; His kingdom spread from shore to shore, Till moons shall wax and wane no more. A curious use of hymns is cited by Fanny Crosby in her autobiography, “Memories of Eighty Years”: “When a member of the Soldiers’ Christian Union meets a comrade he says, ‘Four hundred and ninety-- four,’ which is the number of ‘God be with you till we meet again’ in ‘Sacred Songs and Solos’; the latter replies, ‘Six farther on,’ that is 500, which is the num~+ ber of ‘Blessed assurance.’ ” The famous temperance advocate, John B. Gough, tells of his sad parting from his mother at home to sail for America. The ship, becalmed off Sandsgate, his home, was visited by many of his friends and relatives, and at last by his mother, who had been away during most of the day. When night shut down upon them and the boats were drawing away in the darkness to the shore, all joined in singing: Blest be the dear, uniting love, Which will not let us part; Our bodies may far hence remove, We still are one in heart. THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 91 The Rev. Dr. Samuel West, an old-time New Eng- land pastor, once won over his recalcitrant choir, which had refused to sing in the service, by giving out the hymn, “Come, ye that love the Lord,” and asking all to begin with the second verse: Let those refuse to sing, Who never knew our God. The spirit of warfare, so alien to the Christian faith, has been sometimes justified and sanctified when applied to a righteous cause; and with its heroisms are often associated the singing of hymns. “Terrible as is war,” said Heine, “it yet displays the spiritual gran- deur of man, daring to defy his mightiest and heredi- tary enemy, Death.” While the ungodly man, with a grim outward stoicism, sets his face stolidly toward battle, the true Christian, fighting for some sacred cause in the name of the Prince of Peace, advances enthusiastically with a hymn in his heart and oft- times upon his lips, and scorns death merely as the “narrow stream” that ‘divides that happy land from ours.” In this spirit many times has a German army charged into battle, singing Luther’s ‘Hin’ feste Burg”’ (written in 1529), the better to “fight the good fight with all their might,” the good fight of militant Protestantism. This hymn, styled by Heine ‘The Marseillaise of the Reformation,” is known to have been sung by the army of Gustavus Adolphus before the Battle of Leipzig, in 1631, and also before the Battle of Liitzen, in 1632. The Huguenots of France frequently used it during the troublous years, 1560 92 MUSIC AND HYMNODY to 1572; and many instances are recorded of its use by regiments of Germans in the Franco-Prussian war. ‘Fear not, O little flock, the foe,” was composed and used as the battle song of the Swedish king, Gus- tavus Adolphus, in his campaign against Wallenstein for the preservation of Protestantism in Germany. Of several theories as to its authorship, the most probable one, and that accepted by the editors of our Hymnal, is that Dr. Jacob Fabricus (or Fabricius), the court chaplain, in these poetical lines paraphrased the thought and sentiment of the king, thus giving to the army a hymn, by which they conquered in the Battle of Liitzen, though at the frightful cost of losing their gallant and devout commander. Another German hymn of war times is “Now thank we all our God.” Some evidence makes questionable the story that it was written as a national Te Deum after the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648). Even though it may have been written during the war, it was undoubtedly used after the Peace of Westphal as a song of deliverance by the German people, who, like its author, had suffered frightful hardships to win the war. Oliver Cromwell’s army was ridiculed as a psalm- singing rabble, though his detractors knew well that the very singing of their hymns helped to make them the one invincible army in all Europe. In a later chapter we mention the tune “Caledonia,” which the Scottish warriors frequently sang—the THE STORY OF THE HYMNS 93 melody, later set to “Scots, wha hae wi’. Wallace bled,” as they charged upon the English foe in the effort to regain the throne for James III. In our own land how often has the anthem, “My country, ’tis of thee,” inspired a regiment of soldiers! During the Revolutionary War, long before this hymn was writicz, 20 incident occurred concerning its tune, which Dr. Duffield has repeated. A company of British soldiers entered a Long Island church and commanded the colonists to sing, “God save the king.” The melody was sung, but in devotion to their consciences and to their God, the people sang the words frequently used in the earlier days to this tune, thereby confounding their enemies: Come, thou almighty King, Help us thy name to sing. The Rev. Dr. James H. Perry, pastor of the Pacific Street Methodist, Episcopal Church in Brooklyn, was attending Conference in the spring of 1861, when the news of the bombardment of Fort Sumter was re- ceived. He arose amid the intense excitement, and said: “I was educated by the government; it now needs my services. I shall resign my ministry and again take up my sword.” He became colonel of the 48th Regiment N. Y. 8S. Volunteers, which was known as ‘“‘Perry’s Saints.” The Rev. Dr. A. J. Pal- mer, formerly missionary secretary, tells in his book and in his famous lecture the story of his Company D in this regiment, which always went into battle sing- ing, “I’m going home to die no more.” Their com- 94 MUSIC AND HYMNODY rades, therefore, nicknamed the company ‘The Die- no-mores.’”* There was another hymn, “Say, brothers, will you meet us,” brought from Methodist camp meetings to the army by the Second Battalion of Massachusetts Infantry, whose tune, fortunately not in our present Hymnal, exerted a wide influence in the Civil War; for to this tune the words, “John Brown’s body,” were sung throughout the army, and later also the ‘Battle Hymn of the Republic,” by Julia Ward Howe. 1Cf. ‘48th Regiment State Volunteers,” by A. J. Palmer. Published, 1885, by Veteran Association of the Regiment, CHAPTER V THE HYMN-WRITERS Encuish HymNnopy—American HymNopY—Tae TRANSLATIONS—TuHE TITLES Ir the bibliography of hymnody, the body of the hymns, and hymnology, the science of hymns, were developed exhaustively, the study would attain to tremendous proportions. Dr. Julian in his “Dic- tionary of Hymnology” says: “The total number of Christian hymns in the two hundred or more dialects in which they have been written or translated is not less than four hundred thousand. When classified into languages the greatest number are found to be in German, English, Latin, and Greek in the order named.”’ Only a few hymns have survived to be adopted by the modern Church, and a large propor- tion of the best of these are to be found within the Methodist Hymnal. To adequately tell the story of even our own seven hundred and forty-eight hymns, with critical accounts of their authors, the conditions under which they were written, the publications first con- taining them and the dates thereof, their successive alterations and the stories of their use—all these legitimate inquiries of hymnology would easily ex- pand into the proportions of a small library. One hymnologist in Brooklyn, New York, has attempted this with a body of hymns in common 95 96 MUSIC AND HYMNODY use, and already his large manuscript volumes number forty. Having already examined a few typical hymns and their stories, we must be content with but a glimpse of some of the more prominent hymn authors, an outline of the suc- cessive periods in English hymn-writing, together with a statement of our debt to the hymns of foreign languages. The foundations of English hymnody rest largely upon the metrical versions of the Psalms, which, to- gether with other scriptural translations, were long regarded as the only hymn-forms permissible in divine worship. These we shall discuss later, along with other translations from the Hebrew. Though there were many original English hymns before his time, the first great hymnist of England repre- sented in our Hymnal was Bishop Thomas Ken (1637-1711), who wrote the “Morning Hymn” (44), “Evening Hymn” (49), and the Doxology (718), “Praise God, from whom all blessings flow,” all of which appeared first in his ‘‘Manual of Prayers for the Winchester Scholars,” 1700. The good bishop, arrested with six other bishops by James II, and later under William of Orange harassed by political intrigue, would not compromise his prin- ciples to gain political preferment, and hence was forced into retirement. Of him Macaulay said in his “History of England”: “He was a man of parts and learning, of quick sensibility and stainless virtue. His elaborate works have long been for- gotten, but his morning and evening hymns are still THE HYMN-WRITERS 97 repeated daily in thousands of dwellings.” In his retirement Bishop Ken wrote these lines: T gladly wars ecclesiastic fly, ene’er contentious spirits I descry: Eased of my sacred load, I live content, In hymns, not in disputes, my passions vent. Three great authors of his century are represented in the Hymnal by three great hymns, “Teach me, my God and King” (417), by George Herbert (1593-1632) ; “The Lord will come and not be slow” (642), a trans- lation by John Milton (1608-74); and “Lord, it be- longs not to my care” (470), by Richard Baxter (1615- 91), the celebrated author of ‘Saints’ Rest.” In the model style of the brilliant Joseph Addison (1672-1719) we have three hymns, each of them from his famous periodical, ‘The Spectator’”’: “The spacious firmament on high” (84), being from “Spectator” No. 465, 1712; “How are thy servants blest, O Lord” (102), from No. 489, 1712; and ‘“ When all thy mercies, O my God” (105), from No. 453, 1712. The Preface to the Methodist Hymnal announces that it contains, besides the Wesley hymns, ‘“‘the choicest work of the other hymn-writers of the eight- eenth century, Doddridge, Watts, Cowper, Newton, Montgomery.” The first of these, in chronology, in some points of excellence, and in the number of hymns in our collection (fifty-three, next to Charles Wesley’s the highest number), was the Rev. Dr. Isaac Watts (1674-1748). Born in a nonconformist family, in severest times of religious persecution, he dis- 98 MUSIC AND HYMNODY plays a militant dogmatism on the side of Calvinism in much of-his work. But, nevertheless, his devout and earnest thought, cast in the mold of scriptural phrase, and making use of the simplest English words, has won for him the title, “The Father of English Hymns.” The Watts translations from the Psalms are mentioned ona later page. His hymn, “When I survey the wondrous cross’ (141), was stvled by Matthew Arnold “the greatest hymn in the English language.”’” Next in the number of our hymns (twen- ty-two) stands the Rev. Dr. Philip Doddridge (1702- 51), theologian and poet, who is best known to Meth- odists by his hymn, “O happy day, that fixed my choice.” Even more than Watts he confined his poems to scriptural phrase. For twenty years he was pastor in a Northampton nonconformist church, at the same time writing voluminously and teaching young theologians vigorously. The Rev. John Newton (1725-1807) and William Cowper (1731-1800), though younger than the Wes- leys, lived and worked as their contemporaries. From the former we have thirteen hymns, from the latter ten. Newton was converted from a violent life of sin while at sea, and, returning to England, he gave his life to an active ministry, keeping in touch with the Wesleys and their work. In his residence at Olney as curate, he became associated with Cowper in writ- ing ‘The Olney. Hymns.” Cowper’s life had been redeemed from a life of despair to A season of clear shining, To cheer it after rain, THE HYMN-WRITERS 99 (to use his own phrase in hymn 454); and, though later his temperamental morbidness would sometimes unbalance his mind, he sang through his sorrow the same redemption and with the same intensity as New- ton. Cowper’s “There is a fountain filled with blood” (291), and Newton’s “Glorious things of thee are spoken” (210), have long been great favorites in Methodist worship. The last of these five names, James Montgomery (1771-1854), belongs more to the nineteenth than to the eighteenth century. Nineteen of his four hundred hymns are in our collection. A Scotchman so radical in his politics as to be twice cast into prison, an editor and literary critic, he will long be remembered for his Christian piety and its beautiful expression in such hymns as “Behold! the Christian warrior stands” (397) “Tn the hour of trial” (431), or “Prayer is the soul’s sincere desire’’ (497). The greatest of all English hymn-writers was Charles Wesley, greatest in the prodigious number of hymns that he wrote (said to be over sixty-five hundred with- in fifty years), greatest in his statement of doctrine and the earnestness of his zeal, and greatest in his high poetic expression of an intense love for the Saviour. His hymns in the Methodist Hymnal are one hundred and twenty-nine, or about one sixth of the book. The eighteenth child in the Wesley family, he came near to being adopted by a wealthy Irish gentleman. But he did not leave his family, until he made the journey to Georgia with his brother, John. After his con- version and a brief stay in Islington as curate, he 100 MUSIC AND HYMNODY joined his brother’s great work for the rest of his life, Their relaton to the Church of England caused a difference of opinion on the subject between the two brothers; but as preachers and as hymn-writers both remained loyal and tremendously active in advancing the cause of Methodism. The Wesleys were the most remarkable family in the annals of hymnology. The father of John and Charles, the Rev. Samuel Wesley (1662-1735), an intensely earnest clergyman of the Church of England, passed through a series of hardships both in providing for his large family from a meager income and in fac- ing the bitter opposition of his fellow townsmen at Epworth, that would have overwhelmed a less coura- geous man. His writings in prose were voluminous; and of his poetry we still preserve in our Hymnal his lines: “Behold the Saviour of mankind” (142). His wife, Susanna Wesley, through the remarkable in- fluence of her piety upon her children, has won the title, “The Mother of Methodism.” Four of their children became poets of a high order. From the Rev. Samuel Wesley, the younger, and his sister, Mehetabel Wesley, we possess no hymns in our Hym- nal, though many hymns from the former are now in use in England, while from the sacred poetry of the latter many verses could well be used as hymns. While Charles was the greatest hymn-writer, John Wesley (1703-91) was in other respects the greater man; for through his marvelous genius for organiza- tion, his infinite capacity for work, and his ability as a preacher he exerted the greatest influence of any THE HYMN-WRITERS 101 man upon his generation in England. And withal he excelled as a hymn-writer. Over thirty translations he made from the German, French, and Spanish, many of them being in our Hymnal. Our one original hymn from his pen is ‘How happy is the pilgrim’s lot”’ (624), the rest, save for a quatrain doxology, being translations or alterations. An important commentary upon the hymnodic inspirations of the Wesleyan movement in the eight- eenth century is to be found in the remarkable list of hymn-writers in the Hymnal, who were allied with the Wesleys either in active work or frequent sympathetic communication, The Rev. Robert Seagrave (1693- 1764), famous for “Rise, my soul, and stretch thy wings” (623), a clergyman of the Established Church, became a coworker with the Wesleys. The two Welsh- men, the Rev. William Williams (1717-91), author of “Guide me, O thou great Jehovah” (91), and John Cennick (1718-55), author of three hymns—one of them, “Jesus, my all, to heaven is gone” (306), being a favorite in America—were both active in the new evangelism. Cennick was a lay preacher. Their Calvinism, however, later led them apart from the Wesleys. Likewise the Rev. William Ham- mond (1719-83), at first a Calvinistic Methodist, finally joined the Moravians. The Rev. Thomas Ol- ivers (1725-99), a cobbler converted under White- field, became a.great Wesleyan preacher, and wrote “The God of Abraham praise” (4) and “O thou God of my salvation” (25). The familiar “All hail the power of Jesus’ name!” (180) was written by the Rev. Ed- 102 MUSIC AND HYMNODY ward Perronet (1721?-1792), who for eight years was intimately associated with the Wesleys. The Rev. Robert Robinson (1735-90), author of “Come, thou Fount of every blessing” (19), and the Rev. John Faweett (1740-1817), author of ‘‘Blest be the tie that binds” (556), and four other hymns of ours, were both converted under Whitefield’s preaching and became Methodists, though the latter afterward served a Baptist church. So each one of these eight sacred poets drew spiritual inspiration from Methodism. The author of “Rock of Ages” (279), the Rev. Augustus M. Toplady (1740-78), really belonged to the new evangelistic movement; but his Calvinism: kept him in violent controversy with John Wesley. Before he was thirty years old he had received an ecclesiastical appointment in London, but his frail. body and emotional temperament could not with- stand the overwork and the onslaughts of the disease, that conquered him within ten years. The Rev. Joseph Hart (1712-68), who wrote “Come, ye sinners” (259), and three more of our hymns, was a Congregationalist. The Rev. Benjamin Beddome (1717-95), the Rev. Samuel Medley (1738-99), the Rev. Dr. Samuel Stennett (1727-95), and the Rev. Benjamin Francis (1734-99), each represented by three or four of our hymns, were Baptists. Stennett’s grandfather, the Rev. Joseph Stennett (1663-1713), wrote our hymn, “Another six days’ work is done” (70). Sir Robert Grant (1785-1838), a member of Parlia- ment and later governor of Bombay, and Reginald THE HYMN-WRITERS 103 Heber (1783-1826), Bishop of Calcutta, each wrote six of our hymns. Both were hymnodists of the first literary rank, both were deeply devout, both died in India. Bishop Heber, the more missionary of the two in spirit, is best known to us by the hymn: “From Greenland’s icy mountains” (655); Sir Robert Grant by “O worship the King’”’ (106). The influences of the Oxford Movement in the early nineteenth century for the regeneration of the Church of England have left a permanent impress upon Eng- lish hymns. The Rev. John Keble (1792-1866), author of our morning and evening hymns—‘‘New every morning is the love”’ (42) and “Sun of my soul” (47)—and also of “‘Blest are the pure in heart’”’(360)— preached in Oxford the famous Assize Sermon in 1833, which Cardinal Newman declared to be the first impetus of the Oxford Movement. These hymns are taken from his famous poetical work, “The Christian Year,” 1827 (the last of these three hymns being a cento), which sounded forth strong notes of warning to the languishing army of the Church. Cardinal John H. Newman’s (1801-90) “Lead, kindly Light, amid th’ encircling gloom,” was essen- tially a product and an expression of the unrest and consequent gloom of this period. His formal entrance into the Church of Rome in 1845 was quickly followed the next year by the secession of Dr. Frederick Wil- liam Faber (1815-63) from the Church of England to Rome. Although all of Faber’s hymns were written after that decision, the spirit of eleven of them is so broad that they are used in our own Methodist Hym- 104 MUSIC AND HYMNODY nal, some with theological alterations, as ‘Faith of our fathers” (415), others without change, as ‘“There’s a wideness in God’s mercy” (98). Matthew Bridges (1800-93), author of “Rise, glorious Conqueror, rise” (161), and “Crown him with many crowns’ (179), also left the Church of England for Roman Catholi- cism. Of the older clergymen, contemporary with the leaders of the Oxford Movement, though less active in controversy, were the Rev. Henry Francis Lyte (1793-1847), author of “Abide with me” (50), said to be the greatest hymn-writer of his period; the Rev. William H. Bathurst (1796-1877), author of “O for that flame of living fire” (187), each of whom wrote three of our hymns; the Rev. Thomas Kelley (1769- 1855), whose hymns are all peculiarly majestic, in tone, and the Rev. Christopher Wordsworth (1807- 85), Bishop of Lincoln, author of “O day of rest and gladness” (68). Each of the last two wrote six of our hymns. Of the younger clergymen of this period, the Rev. Dr. Horatius Bonar (1808-89) was the most popular, having written twelve of our hymns, such as “I lay my sins on Jesus” (488) and “I heard the voice of Jesus say” (304). His wife wrote our hymn No. 529. Dean H. H. Milman (1791-1868), of Saint Paul’s, wrote ‘Ride on, ride on in majesty” (150), Dean Henry Alford (1810-71), of Canterbury, “Forward! be our watchword” (384) and three other hymns of ours, and Dean Arthur P. Stanley (1815-81), of Westminster,’ two hymns and one translation in our Hymnal.: THE HYMN-WRITERS 105 Among our six hymns from Bishop William Walsham How (1823-97) the most popular is “O Jesus, thou art standing” (282), while many pronounce his “For all the saints” (430) the greatest hymn added to our collection by the recent revision. The Rev. J. S. B. Monsell (1811-75), the Rev. Godfrey Thring (1823- 1903), the Rev. Dr. Edward H. Bickersteth (1825- 1906) author of “Peace,perfect peace” (528) ,the Rev. John Ellerton (1826-93), author of “Saviour, again to thy dear name” (38), and the Rev. Sabine Baring- Gould (1834- ), author of “Onward, Christian soldiers!’ (383) should all be added to the list of successful clerical hymnists of this period. Three or four hymns from each of them are in our Hymnal. Four distinguished knights are also counted among the hymn-writers of the nineteenth century: Sir Robert Grant, already mentioned; Sir John Bowring, LL.D. (1792-1872), a noted Unitarian scholar and governmental executive, once governor of Hong- kong, on whose tombstone was inscribed the first line of his hymn, ‘In the cross of Christ I glory” (143); Sir Edward Denny (1796-1889), a member of the Plymouth Brethren; and the Rev. Sir Henry Williams Baker (1821-77), Vicar of Monkland. From some of England’s greatest poets we have chosen two or more hymns. Sir Walter Scott’s (1771- 1832) ‘When Israel, of the Lord beloved”’ (95), based on the one hundred and fifth psalm, is introduced into his novel, “Ivanhoe,” where it is sung by Rebecca, the Jewess, at the close of the day on which her trial oc- curred; and his free translation of ‘Dies Irae,” “The 106 MUSIC AND HYMNODY day of wrath, that dreadful day” (603), occurs at the clase of ‘The Lay of the Last Minstrel,” wherein it is sung in Melrose Abbey. Thomas Moore’s (1779- 1852) “O Thou who driest the mourner’s tear’’ (522) and “Come, ye disconsolate” (526) are a part of his “Sacred Songs,” 1816. Alfred, Lord Tennyson (1809- 92), has given to our hymnody “Strong Son of God, im- mortal Love’ (139), “Late, late, so late!’ (743) and “Sunset and evening star” (744); and Mrs. Elizabeth Barrett Browning (1806-61), “Since without Thee we do no good” (504) and “‘Of all the thoughts of God that are” (541). American hymnody made its beginnings in the metrical Psalms, as we shall see in later paragraphs. Timothy Dwight (1752-1817), one of the most cele- brated Psalm versifiers, also- wrote several original hymns. Two other ‘great names in early American psalmody, Oliver Holden (1765-1844) and Thomas Hastings (1784-1872), are celebrated both as hymnists and as composers. Altogether there are nine such names in our Hymnal listed both as composers and authors, attached to.the music or words of twenty-nine of our hymns. Besides Holden and Hastings the others are Sir Henry William Baker, Frances Ridley Havergal, Martin Luther, the Rev. A. H. C. Malan, Georg Neumark, the Rev. John H. Stockton, and Caleb T. Winchester. Most of them were also editors of musical collections. In only four of the twenty-nine hymns is the composer and author the same person. Eight names great in the annals of American poetry THE HYMN-WRITERS 107 are to be found among the authors of our hymns. William Cullen Bryant (1794-1878) author of ‘“Thana- topsis,” etc., wrote four hymns of the present Hymnal, just half the number in the 1878 Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, for which he wrote especially a Temperance Hymn. now omitted. Nathaniel Parker Willis (1807- 67), whose poetry attained widespread though short- lived popularity in the middle of the last century, wrote hymn No. 660; and his brother, Richard Storrs Willis, wrote the music to our hymn, “It came upon the midnight clear” (110), by the Unitarian clergy- man, Dr. Sears. ‘There’s a song in the air’’ (112) is by Dr. Josiah G. Holland (1819-81), author of ‘Ka- trina,” and editor of Scribner’s Magazine. The two greatest American men of letters among our hymn- writers are Oliver Wendell Holmes (1809-94) and John G. Whittier (1806-92). Dr. Holmes’s ‘Lord of ' all being” (82) and ‘“‘O Love divine, that stooped to share” (457) both appeared in his famous volume, “The Professor at the Breakfast Table.” Mr. Whit- tier’s seven hymns breathe the spirit of devout humility so characteristic of the Quaker poet, a humility evident even in the very first lines of the hymns: ‘We may not climb the heavenly steeps” (128), “It may not be our lot to wield (398), “I bow my forehead in the dust” (472), “Dear Lord and Father of mankind, Forgive our feverish ways” (543). Three younger famous literary men have each given to us one hymn: John Hay (1838-1905), Lincoln’s private secretary and President McKinley’s Secretary of State; Sidney Lanier (1842-81), the poet of the 108 MUSIC AND HYMNODY South, whose pathetic music sings sadly through the ‘ lines, “Into the woods my Master went” (745); and Richard Watson Gilder (1844-1909), editor of the Century Magazine, the son of a Methodist minister. Two American clergymen, whose names are less known in other forms of poetry, have come to be re- garded as the greatest American hymn-writers: the Rev. Dr. Ray Palmer (1808-87) and the Rev. Dr.Sam- uel Francis Smith (1808-95). Each was born in the year 1808, and each is represented by four hymns in our Hymnal. ‘The morning light is breaking” (653) and “My country, ’tis of thee” (702), are by Dr. Smith, and “My faith looks up to thee” (334), by Dr. Palmer, the last two being in the same meter. The Protestant Episcopalian Bishop of New Jersey, George Washington Doane (1799-1859), so named because he was born the same year when died the “Father of his Country,” wrote three of our hymns, all of them well known: “Fling out the banner’ (639), “Thou art the Way” (133), “Softly now the light of day” (53). His son, William Croswell Doane (1832- 1913), first Bishop of Albany, wrote “Ancient of days” (76). Just as the English hymnologist, the Rev. Dr. John Julian (1834-1913), editorof the great “Diction- ary of Hymnology,” produced one of our best hymns (15), so also did the American hymnologist, the Rev. Dr. George Duffield, Jr. (1818-88), in “Stand up, stand up for Jesus!’ (886). Three of our hymns came from the Unitarian clergyman, the Rev. Samuel Longfellow (1819-92), who was a brother of the poet Longfellow; one hymn each from the Rev. Dr. Charles F. Deems § wowhup thu 0 Hoty Gheo, D hove te wreship Her i trsim Lord tor wou lk, b woul: hae. UH okt ee ed, ales! one I qninwd me Oy Le b ce The pat Loe ee cost, a ets ornbhin le ot en Autograph Copy of Dr. William F. Warren’s Hymn, “IT Worship Thee, O Holy Ghost.” THE HYMN-WRITERS 109 (1819-93), the Rev. Dr. Maltbie D. Babcock (1851- 1901), both New York city pastors; the Rev. Dr. Henry M. Dexter (1821-90), editor of the Congrega- tionalist; the Rev. Dr. J. E. Rankin (1828-1904), president of Howard University, Washington, D. C., who wrote ‘God be with you”; the Rev. Dr. J. H. Gilmore (1834- _), professor in Rochester University, who wrote ‘‘He leadeth me’’; Bishop Phillips Brooks (1835-93), ‘of Boston ; the Rev. Dr. Washington Gladden, the well-known author; and the Rev. Dr. Melancthon Woolsey Stryker (1851- ), president of Hamilton College. Of the Methodist authors still living, the Rev. Dr. William Fairfield Warren’ (1833- ), dean of the School .of Theology, Boston University, brother of Bishop Warren, and also Professor Caleb T. Win- chester, of Wesleyan University, each wrote one hymn. The Rev. Dr. Frank Mason North, secretary of the New York City Church Extension and Mission- ary Society, and the Rev. Dr. Benjamin Copeland, pastor of the Humboldt Parkway Church, in Buffalo, New York, each wrote two hymns. Dr. North’s beautiful lines were inspired by the crying needs of his missionary work in the city (423): Where cross the crowded ways of life, Where sound the cries of race and clan, Above the noise of selfish strife, We hear thy voice, O Son of man! To which he adds in the fifth verse this plaintive prayer: O Master, from the mountain side, Make haste to heal these hearts of pain, 110 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Among these restless throngs abide, O tread the city’s streets again. H. M. Chalfont has already calculated’ that of 301 authors in the Methodist Hymnal about one half are clergymen and over one sixth are women. Fifty- three women have written eighty-seven hymns, Six- teen feminine names were dropped from the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, and nineteen new ones added to the new Hymnal. While woman’s work as a com- poser is relatively insignificant, comprising less than ten of our hymn tunes, her work as hymn-writer often reaches the height of spiritual sublimity. The first group of women among the hymn-writers of the Methodist Hymnal consists of Mrs. Anna Letitia Barbauld (1743-1825), one of whose two hymns, “Come, said Jesus’ sacred voice” (257), is a Methodist favorite; Miss Harriet Auber (1773-1825), a native of London and a devout member of the Church of Eng- land, whose missionary hymn, ‘‘Hasten, Lord, the glorious time’’ (637), is the best of our three hymns from her pen; ‘Mrs. Vokes,” regarded by some as a nom de plume, author of ‘Soon may the last glad song arise’ (630); and the greatest woman among hymn- writers, Miss Charlotte Elliott (1789-1871), author of five of our hymns, among them being “My God, my Father, while I stray” (521, 736) and “Just as I am” (272), probably the most powerful soul-winning hymn ever penned. The most popular hymn by a woman is “Nearer, my God, to thee” (315), by Mrs. Sarah Flower Adams 1“Women in the New Hymnal,” Christian Advocate, 1905, p. 1541. THE HYMN-WRITERS 111 (1805-48), a devout Unitarian, whose father, Benja- min Flower, was a political prisoner in jail for writing’ a defense of the French Revolution, when he met Miss Eliza Gould, who afterward married him and became the mother of Sarah Flower Adams. With her hymn is sometimes compared another that is similar in spirit and meter, ‘More love to thee, O Christ” (317), by Mrs. Elizabeth Payson Prentiss (1818-78). Miss Anna Letitia Waring (1820- ), born in Wales, and Adelaide Ann Procter (1825-64), each composed three of our hymns, and Mrs. Cecil Francis Alexander (1823-95), in Ireland, two of our hymns, that may be classed among the very best. They are all intensely personal in tone. The first personal pronoun is used at least fourteen times in each of these hymns by Miss ‘Waring, but always linked with the ideal of great humility. The same thing is true of Miss Procter’s three hymns, all of which are prayers for divine leader- ship, for divine blessing, or offering thanks. Miss Frances Ridley Havergal (1836-79), to whom reference is made in the preceding chapter, wrote eight of our Methodist hymns, more than any other woman. Of Madame Guyon, Mrs. Browning, and the trans- lators, Miss Jane Borthwick and Miss Catherine Wink- worth, we have spoken elsewhere. In our own land Mrs. Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811- 96), author of ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin” and of the hymn “Still, still with Thee” (43), is the most famous woman in the Hymnal, though Mrs. Frances J. Van Alstyne (1820-1915), known as “Fanny Crosby,” the blind poetess, has written more hymns than any other “112 MUSIC AND HYMNODY woman—over five thousand in all. Among Methodist women should be named Miss Mary Artemisia Lath- bury (1841-1913), whose Chautauqua hymns are in the Hymnal, Mrs. F. K. Stratton ( ? -1910), and Mrs. Caroline Laura Rice (1819-1899), wife of the Rev. Dr. William Rice, of Springfield, Massachusetts, where he was City Librarian until his death in 1897. The Rev. Paul Weyand has shown that 258 of the 717 hymns of the Hymnal, or thirty-six per cent, were written by ministers’ children, sons and daughters.’ Of these it may be observed more than half came from the zealous occupants of the Epworth Rectory, the Wesleys. THE TRANSLATIONS Religious thought has coursed through many differ- ent languages since the Day of Pentecost, and while there are many trutlis of Christianity that have found their noblest expression in the English language, there, are but few doctrines that have not been at least partially enunciated in some other language. This ‘debt of ours to other tongues may be distinctly traced in our hymnology; and, while it would be a colossal, if not to some extent impossible, task to relate each devotional idea in our hymns to its original source, it is by no means impossible or uninteresting to seek out the original hymns written in some other language, from which many of the hymns we now use have been translated into English, some of them freely and some of them with great accuracy. 1“Ministers’ Children as Authors in the New Hymnal,” Christian Advo- cate (N. Y.), 1906, p. 721. Sia aes THE HYMN-WRITERS 113 From the Danish hymn “Igjennem Nat og Traeng- sel,” by the eminent poet and professor of the Danish language and literature at the Academy of Soro, Zea- land, Denmark, Bernhardt S. Ingemann, has come our hymn (567), “Through the night of doubt and sorrow,” translated by the Rev. Sabine Baring-Gould. William Cowper’s translation from the French of Madame Guyon’s ‘Amour que mon 4me est contente”’ has produced our hymn (518) “My Lord, how full of sweet content, I pass my years of banishment,’ and recalls, as has been previously stated, her persecution by the Church of Rome because of the faith that she held so dear. Another hymn from the French is Antoinette Bourignon’s “Venez, Jesus, mon salu- taire,” which John Wesley translated into our hymn (379), “Come, Saviour, Jesus, from above.” From the Hebrew was derived the hymn (4) ‘The God of Abraham praise,” practically a translation by Thomas Olivers of the Hebrew Yigdal, or Doxology, which rehearses in metrical form the thirteen articles of the Hebrew creed. This was originally compiled by Daniel ben Judah, a medieval writer, although the creed itself was compiled before this in the twelfth century by Moses Maimonides. The story is repeated concerning Thomas Olivers, a militant coworker of John Wesley’s, that he was first inspired to write this wonderful English version by hearing the Hebrew hymn sung in a London synagogue by the congrega- tion, led by Rabbi Leoni, to the tune that in our Hymnal bears his name. The twelve verses, taken from Olivers’s long poem, that made hymns 1075, 114 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 1076, and 1077 in the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, have been compressed into one hymn of six verses in this Hymnal. The debt of our hymnology to the Hebrew language is very great through the metrical translation of the Scriptures. Undoubtedly some of these scriptural hymns were made from the King James English version of the Bible, though surely some give evidence of having come directly from the original Hebrew. One of the earliest and most famous collections of metrical translations of the Psalms was the famous Sternhold and Hopkins book, published in London in 1562. Sternhold, in a sense. the father of English psalmody, had died thirteen years before, but his work was brought to a certain perfection by the Oxo- nian poet, John Hopkins. This book was used for a hundred and thirty years until the Restoration. From it we get the hymn in the 1878 Hymnal, “The Lord descended from above.” In Scotland the psalm books begin with the 1564 psalter, which was later supplanted by other books, as the ‘Royal Psalter’ in 1630, and the famous ‘Rous’ Version” in 1648, amended in 1650. But in England the Sternhold and Hopkins book was not supplanted until “The New Version,” 1696, by two Irishmen, Nahum Tate (1652- 1715) and the Rev. Nicholas Brady (1659-1726), met with widespread and lasting favor. As late as 1789 this book was adopted by the Protestant Episcopal Church in America. From this collection we get such well-known hymns as: “To Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,”’ Doxology (720), ‘As pants the hart for cool- THE HYMN-WRITERS 115 ing streams” (316), and “O Lord, our fathers oft have told” (700). In 1707 Isaac Watts, in whom the metrical trans- lation of the Psalms reached its highest beauty, pro- duced ‘“‘Imitations of the Psalms of David in the language of the New Testament.” From this great work have come many of the fifty-three hymns from Watts’s pen in the Methodist Hymnal. In America the first psalm book printed was “The Bay Psalm Book,” 1640, which replaced the ‘“Ains- worth Version” from Holland, then in use. In 1785 Joel Barlow and in 1800 Timothy Dwight made im- portant American revisions of the metrical psalms of Isaac Watts, and from the latter we have “I love thy kingdom, Lord” (208). Timothy Dwight also wrote “While life prolongs its precious light’? (254) and “Shall man, O God of light and life” (596). While two centuries ago the Church regarded as little less than sacrilegious the singing in divine wor- ship of other hymns than translations from the Scrip- tures, to-day the popularity of original hymns is fast crowding the ancient metrical psalm out of our hym- nals. Three fifths of the metrical psalms in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal are not in the new Hymnal. Most of those omitted were by Watts, Wesley, and Montgomery, about equally divided between the three. Two from Milton, one from Tate and Brady, and one from Sternhold were among the banished. Of those metrical psalms retained from the old in the new Hymnal by far the largest number are by Isaac Watts, which argues the better adapta- 116 MUSIC AND HYMNODY bility of many of his translations, strong in thought _and simple in vocabulary, to our modern taste. Besides the Psalms, many other translations from the Hebrew Scriptures appear in our Hymnal, while the very free translations and hymns largely based on certain passages greatly outnumber the strict trans- lations. Philip Doddridge scarcely ever wrote, save in following closely the scriptural thought and phrase. Charles Wesley translated into hymns the language of Isaiah, Proverbs, Ezekiel, and Micah; and Newton and Cowper also verses from Isaiah. While the New Testament has undoubtedly exerted the larger influence over modern hymnology, there have come from the New Testament Greek much fewer translations into hymns than from the Old Testament Hebrew. Some of the former are Watts’s “Come, let us join our cheerful songs’’ (24), from Rev. 5. 11-18; Newton’s ‘May the grace of Christ, our Saviour” (40), from 2 Cor. 13. 14; and Tate and’ Brady’s ‘‘While shepherds watched their flocks” (115), from Luke 2. 8-14. The venerable and scholarly Professor Harmon, of Dickinson College, used to delight in saying to his classes that if the angels in heaven choose some one human language in which to converse, it must be good, pure Attic Greek. Be that as it may, the noble Greek language produced for the Eastern Church some of the greatest hymns of the ages. They are marked by a strong simplicity of expression, com- bined in some instances with the most exalted devo- tion, Our hymn (672) “Shepherd of tender youth” THE HYMN-WRITERS 117 was translated by the Rev. Dr. H. M. Dexter, a New England Congregational clergyman, from the earliest known Christian hymn: “Zroziov tdAwy ddaev” (liter- ally, ‘Bridle of steeds untamed”), by Saint Clement of Alexandria A. D. 170-220). Most of our Greek hymns are a part of that body of inspiring translations from the Greek with which Dr. J. M. Neale has enriched our English hymnody. The authorship of the Greek original of “Art thou weary” (293) has been a puzzling question for critics. Dr. Neale at first attributed it to Stephen, the Sabaite, nephew of Saint John of Damascus, though hymnol- ogists have searched in vain for the original. Prob- ably the clue to these difficulties is revealed in Dr. Neale’s later comment that there was so little Greek in this hymn that it scarcely deserves to be classed as a translation. Indeed, while Dr. Neale’s other trans- lations in our Hymnal follow the original much more closely than does this hymn, his Greek hymns as a class have been regarded more as adaptations than translations. Dr. Neale’s other Greek translations in the Hymnal are: “The day of resurrection’ (164), from ‘’Avaordoews juépa,” by Saint John of Damas- cus; “Come, ye faithful, raise the strain” (163), from “"Agupev taévte¢ Aaol,” also by Saint John of Damas- cus; and “Christian! dost thou see them?” (616), from “Ov yap BAémeg rods Taparrovrac,” by Saint Andrew, Archbishop of Crete (660-732). These last belong toa later period of Greek hymn-writing, which was distinguished from its predecessors by a marked difference in style. 118 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Practically all of the hymns of the Western Church were written in the Latin, in which has been preserved the best thought of the Christian faith through at least the first fourteen centuries. The choicest of the Latin hymns were selected with great editorial care and embodied in the successive Breviaries, prepared under Papal supervision to standardize the various forms of worship of the Roman Catholic Church. These Breviaries contain not only the hymns but also the forms and ritual of the various offices to be used in the services of the Christian year. Julian mentions nine Breviaries: the Mozarabic (or Spanish), the Am- brosian, the Roman (from which Caswell largely selected his hymns in our Hymnal), the Sarum (in use in England before the Reformation, the chief source of Neale’s translations), the York, the Aberdeen, the Paris (J. Williams, J. Chandler, and J. D. Chambers being the chief translators), the Hereford, and the, Monastic Breviaries. Nearly all of our Methodist hymns from the Latin are translations from original hymns contained in one or more of these Breviaries. Our hymn “All glory, laud, and honor” (31) is Dr. John M. Neale’s translation of ‘Gloria, Laus et Honor,” by Saint Theodulph of Orleans. Until the seven- teenth century this hymn for Palm Sunday retained a quaint verse, of which the following is a translation: Be thou, O Lord, the Rider, And we the little ass, That to God’s holy city Together we may pass. Dr. Neale’s two translations from the famous hymn THE HYMN-WRITERS 119 “Hora Novissima,” by Bernard of Cluny, have attained great popularity. ‘Jerusalem the golden” (612) was taken from that part of ‘(Hora Novissima”’ beginning “Urbs Syon Aurea, Patria lactea;” and “For thee, O dear, dear country” (614), from the part beginning “O bona patria, lumina sobria.” ‘Christ is made the sure Foundation” 662) is Dr. Neale’s translation of that part of the hymn ‘“Angularis Fundamentum” beginning “Urbs beata Hierusalem,” the original authorship of which is still in doubt. The greatest of all Latin hymns, “Dies Ire,’”’ by Thomas of Celano, has inspired two of our hymns, “Day of wrath, O dreadful day” (599), by Dean Ar- thur P. Stanley, and “The day of wrath, that dread- ful day” (603), by Sir Walter Scott, which are the most popular of the hundred and sixty English translations of this hymn that are known. Two fifths of these translations of ‘Dies Irae” were made in America; one man, A. Coles, wrote twelve of them. The most recent is ‘Day of ire, that direful day,” from “Early Christian Hymns,” by Judge Daniel J. Donahoe. While Dean Stanley’s is a true translation, Sir Walter Scott’s contains so much that is original in tone that it is regarded practically as an original hymn. “Come, Holy Ghost, in love” is Dean Stanley’s translation of ‘Veni, Sancte Spiritus,” the authorship of which is sometimes attributed to King Robert IT of France, although over this question hymnologists are still breaking lances. “Creator, Spirit! by whose aid” (194) is a famous translation by the poet John Dryden from “Veni, 120 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Creator Spiritus, Mentes tuorum visita,” which tra- dition vaguely and probably incorrectly attributes to Charlemagne. The most tender of all of our Latin hymns is the “Jesu, dulcis memoria,” by Bernard of Clairvaux, which has inspired three of our present hymns, “Jesus, the very thought of thee” (533), translated by Edward M. Caswell, and “Jesus, thou Joy of loving hearts” (536), translated by Ray Palmer; the third (289) being treated upon a subsequent page among the hymns coming from the Latin through the German. The first of these two direct translations is widely used by English Methodists; but not the second. In fact, with this exception, all of the foregoing Latin translations have long been in use in the Wesleyan Church. Our Wesleyan brothers across the sea make use of Oakeley’s translation of ‘“‘Adeste fideles, lati triumphantes,”’ while we use Caswell’s translation, “O come, all ye faithful, triumphantly sing” (125). Over’ forty English translations of this hymn are known. None of the subsequent Latin translations here men- tioned are in the new Wesleyan Methodist Hymn Book. “Near the cross was Mary weeping’ (154) was translated by J. W. Alexander from the famous “Stabat Mater dolorosa,’’ which has been set to music by many famous composers, such as Palestrina, Per- golesi, Haydn, Rossini, and Dvorak. The hymn is usually ascribed to Pope Innocent ITI (1216) on some- 1“The Lat mns of the Wesl Methodist ” Frederic W. Maciteath London, 1899. ooo" iat yam. Book.” iby THE HYMN-WRITERS 121 what dubious evidence; but was not authorized for public use until 1727 by Pope Benedict XIII. It is part of a larger poem in three divisions for use re- spectively in Vespers, Matins, and Lauds; and of the full text twenty-three translations are mentioned by Julian. Of the history of the Latin chants in the Appendix to the Hymnal we shall not here pause to speak, though it is a subject full of, interest to the scholar who wishes fully to acquaint himself with Roman hym- nody.. Our beautiful hymn (483): My God, I love thee, not because I hope for heaven thereby, is E. M. Caswell’s translations of Saint Francis Xavier’s “O Deus, ego amo Te; Nec amo Te ut salves me.’”’ Many believe that the Latin was founded upon Saint Theresa’s Spanish hymn, “No me mueve, mi Dios, para quererte.” This flow of thought through several languages has produced many of our best hymns. Just as the last mentioned hymn came from the Spanish through Latin into English, so many of our hymns have come from the Latin through the German, and a few of these have had their source in a fourth language higher than the Latin, as the Greek or the Hebrew. The original “Gloria in Excelsis,” for instance, was first uttered (probably in the Aramaic): by the angels that hovered over the hills of Bethlehem that first Christmas morning. At length it came to be written 122 MUSIC AND HYMNODY by the apostle in the Greek Testament, as in Luke 2. 14. This passage was expanded into an early Greek hymn of many verses, from which came the famous Latin version by Saint Theodulph (referred to above). From this the “Gloria in Excelsis” among the chants of our Hymnal is a direct translation in prose. Nico- laus Decius, in the sixteenth century, translated this into German from the Latin, thus: “Allein Gott in der Hoh’ sei Ehr” et seg. From this German version Catherine Winkworth has produced our hymn, ‘To God on high be thanks and praise” (93). A direct translation from the Scriptures of this first Christmas hymn is heard in Handel’s ‘Messiah,’ to the trium- phant music of the chorus, “Glory to God in the high- est.” Likewise Anthony W. Boehm, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, niade a German translation of “Jesu, dulcis memoria,” which was the basis of our well-known hymn “Of Him, who did salvation bring” (289). Thus also came our lines “O sacred Head, now wounded” (151), translated by J. W. Alexander from the German ‘‘O Haupt voll Blut und Wunden,” which, in turn, Paul Gerhardt had translated from the Latin of Bernard of Clairvaux, “Salve caput crumentatum.” The most famous of the German hymns is ‘Ein’ feste Burg,” written by Luther, who also composed the melody for this chorale. This was sung over Luther’s grave at the Schloss-Kirche, Wittenberg. Our trans- lation, “A mighty fortress is our God” (101), by Frederick H. Hedge, D.D., hardly outranks Thomas Carlyle’s “A safe stronghold our God is still,” of the THE HYMN-WRITERS 123 Wesleyan Methodist Hymn Book. Sixty-three trans- lations of this hymn have been published. Another translation from Luther is our ‘“Flung to the heedless winds,” by John A. Messenger. _ Nearly all of the principal English translators of the German hymns are represented in our Hymnal. From our standpoint at least, John Wesley is the most important of them all. Of the nineteen hymns in the Hymnal attributed to John Wesley, fourteen are translations from the German. Two of these are from the German hymns of Count Zinzendorf, the German mystic, ‘Jesus, thy blood and righteousness” (148), and “O thou, to whose all-searching sight” (359) , the latter a free translation from “Seelen Brautigam O du Gotteslamm.” John Wesley also translated the following:. “High on his everlasting throne” (221), a free translation of Augustus G. Spagenberg’s ‘‘Der Konig ruht, und shauet doch”; “Shall I, for fear of feeble man” (225), from John J. Winkler’s “‘Sollt ich aus Fureht vor Menschenkindern”; ‘My soul before thee prostrate lies,” from the Rev. Dr. Christian F. Richter’s “‘ Hier legt mein Sinn sich vor dir nieder’”’; “Now I have found the ground wherein” (302), from Johann A. Rothe’s “Ich habe nun den Grund gefun- den”; “I thank thee, uncreated Sun” (367), from Johann A. Scheffler’s “Ich will dich lieben, meine Starke”; “Into thy gracious hands I fall” (305), a few verses of the hymn beginning, “Jesus, whose glory’s streaming rays,” from Miongane C. Dessler’s “ Mein Jesu, dein die Seraphinen.”’ Three of Paul Gerhardt’s hymns were translated by 124 MUSIC AND HYMNODY John Wesley: “Jesus, thy boundless love to me” (333), from “O Jesu Christ, mein schénes Licht”; “Commit thou all thy griefs’” (435) and “Give to the winds thy fears” (437), both from “Befiehl due deine wege.” Gerhardt’s “O du allersiisste Freude” was translated into our “Holy Ghost, dispel our sadness” (192), by John C. Jacobi, assisted by the alterations of Toplady. Wesley’s “I thirst, thou wounded Lamb of God”? (335), was translated from two hymns, Zinzendorf’s ‘‘Ach! mein verwundter Fiirste” and J. Nitschmann’s “Du blutiger Versiihner.” The complete cento included excerpts also from other hymns by Zinzendorf and Anna Nitschmann. From Gerhard Tersteegen’s “Verborgne Gottesliebe du” John Wesley wrote “Thou hidden love of God, whose height” (845); and from his “Gott rufet noch, sollt ich nicht endlich héren,” Jane Borthwick wrote “God calling yet! shall I not hear?” (252.) She also translated B. Schmolck’s “Mein Jesu, wie du wilst”’ into our exquisitely beautiful “My Jesus, as thou wilt” (524). Catherine Winkworth’s translations are recognized as among the most beautiful ever made into English hymns. Without deviating far from the German verbiage she preserves the strength and dignity of the origmal. Her seven translations in our Hymnal are but a small, though very choice, portion from her best work in this field. Her hymn, “Now thank we all our God,” is but one of thirty translations by various authors from Martin Rinkart’s “Nun danket alle Gott.” Her other translations are: “Leave God to THE HYMN-WRITERS 125 order all thy ways” (476), from Georg Neumark’s “Wer nur den lieben Gott lasst walten’”’; “Whate’er my God ordains is right” (487), from Samuel Rodi- gast’s “Was Gott thut das ist wohlgethan, Es bleibt gerecht sein Wille.” Two of her translations are from Petrus Herbert: ‘Now God be with us” (58), from his “Die nacht is kommen darin wir ruhen sollen,” and “Faith is a living power from heaven” (286), from ‘Der Glaub’ ist ein lebendige kraft,” which isa part of alarger hymn. Her “ Fear not, O little flock, the foe’ (445) is from ‘‘Verzage nicht du Héuflein klein,” by Jacob Fabricus. Carl J. P. Spitta’s ‘“O selig Haus, wo man dich auf genommen” was translated by Mrs. Alexander into “O happy home, where thou art loved the dearest”’ (671); and Richard Massie wrote “I know no life divided” (467), from a part of his German hymn, which begins, ‘“‘O Jesu, meine Sonne.” Matthias Claudius wrote “Im Anfang war’s auf Erden,”’ which Miss Jane Campbell translated: “We plow the fields and scatter” (716). The first line of that most popular of all German Christmas carols, “Stille Nacht,” in our Hymnal is “Silent night!’ (123) though in many other hymnals it is “Holy night!” From ‘“Beim friihen Morgenlicht” Caswell wrote “When morning gilds the skies” (82); from “Schén- ster Herr Jesu’ came ‘‘Fairest Lord Jesus’’ (118). Nor does the relation of our hymns to foreign lan- guages end with the catalogue we have just recited. Many of these hymns have been translated from the Greek and Latin and German into other foreign lan- 126 MUSIC AND HYMNODY guages. Nearly all of Count Zinzendorf’s best hymns, for instance, along with many other Moravian hymns, have been translated from the original German into Danish, Dutch, French, Swedish, Esthonian, Letonian, Wendish, and several other languages, besides the English. But, what is of more interest tous, some of the best hymns originally framed in English have been trans- lated into other tongues. ‘Take my life, and let it be” has been translated into French, German, Swedish, Russian, and several other languages of Europe and even of Africa, Its expression of humility has spared it from suffering the fate of the Russian translation of the gospel hymn, ‘Hold the fort, for I am coming,” which was officially censored by the government of Russia as being too revolutionary in sentiment. A study of many mission hymnals, that we have ex- amined, proves to us that we dare not attempt to sketch the linguistic fortunes of even one of the many international hymns, some of them passing into hun- dreds of alien languages and dialects on their errand of singing their great truths to the hearts of “every kindred, every tribe on this terrestrial ball.” As a class the most scholarly translations from the English have been those turned into Latin. For in- stance, several Latin translations have been made of the hymn, ‘The church’s one foundation” (207), the best being “Nobis unum est fundamen,”’ by the Rev. E. Marshall, 1882, and “Qui Ecclesiam instauravit,” by T. G. Godfrey-Faussett, 1878. This hymn has been translated into all the dominant modern lan- THE HYMN-WRITERS 127 -guages. The Latin version of “The King of love my Shepherd is” (136) that is best known is ‘Rex amoris, ut pastoris”; and of ‘When gathering clouds” (134), R. Bingham’s “Quum circumcirca glomerantia nubilia cernam,”’ wherein the sound of the Latin words seems to fit the rolling and rumbling of the clouds much better than the original English. The Rev. C. B. Pearson’s translation of our hymn, “O come, and mourn with me awhile” (152) begins with the line, “Adeste fideles, mecum complorantes’—a startling contrast to the well-known ‘“ Adeste fideles, laeti triumphantes.”’ Mr. Gladstone was fond of render- ing into Latin as well as into Greek some of our best hymns. Our “Rock of Ages” he made into “Jesu, pro me perforatus,” and our hymn, ‘Art thou weary” (293), he began with the line, ‘“‘Scis, te lassum? scis languentem?’ Macgill’s translation of the same hymn begins, “Sisne lassus #rumnosus?” The titles of the hymns are truly a part of the story of the hymns, though our interest in them is not so great as in the tune titles, since the former are not given in the Methodist Hymnal as they were in the Hymnal of 1878. Even in the older Hymnal it was the exception to find the same title to a hymn under which it originally appeared. The reason for this lies partly in the fact that some of the old titles were very long and unwieldy, partly in the taste of succes- sive editors. For instance, originally our hymn “Author of faith’? (298) was entitled, “The Life of Faith, Exemplified in the Eleventh Chapter of St. 128 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Paul’s Epistle to the Hebrews’; while ‘Make haste, O man, to live” (390) was entitled “Live.” Both titles were altered for the reason just cited. Another long title is, “God’s Gracious Approbation of a Religious Care of our Families” (670). The occasional caprice that has determined tune titles is not evident in the hymn titles. The great majority of hymns derive their titles, like other poems, from the thought of the words. Some, however, in their title declare the occasion of their inspiration, as “For the Anniversary Day of One’s Conversion” (1), “Written before Preaching at Portland” (241), “An Apology for my Twilight Rambles Addressed to a Lady” (498), “After Preaching to the Newcastle Colliers” (643), the stories of which have already been told in a previous chapter. The following original titles speak for themselyes: ‘Comfort in God under the Removal of Ministers or other Useful Persons by Death” (592), “For the Dedication of an Organ, or for a Meeting of Choirs” (27), “A Liturgy for Missionary Meetings” (60), “The Holy Catholic Church: the Communion of Saints” (207), written by a Catholic on the Ninth Article of the Creed. Toplady’s title to our hymn “Rock of Ages” (279), “A living and dying Prayer for the Holiest Believer in the World,” was evidently intended for an answer to the doctrine that Christian perfection is attainable before death. CHAPTER VI THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS Hymns as Teacners—Fatse Doctrines To BE AVoIDED— Our Hymnopy a ResTaTEMENT oF CREED Hymns are eloquent teachers of doctrine. Some hymnologists have carelessly stated that true hymns should not teach theology. The statement needs qualifying. Art best achieves her purposes when she least appears to be consciously striving for them. Likewise hymns are often the most effective teachers when they least seem to be didactic. The hymn- writer must assume the tone of prophet rather than logician, for syllogisms cannot be woven into the fabric of a hymn. Some of Isaac Watts’s favorite hymns have been strangled by over-dogmatism. Nevertheless, the body of our hymns contains all of the fundamental thought on which our religious system is built; and there is not an essential doctrine of our faith that cannot be found in the Hymnal. The influence of hymns as teachers of theology to the people can hardly be overestimated. Their very form is adapted to easy memorization. Clothed in language concise and chaste, swaying to the motion of rhythm, and rounded with rhyme, these poetical phrases that bear the great spiritual truths of the Church, when repeatedly sung to inspiring music, firmly fasten themselves upon the memories of the people, 129 { 130 MUSIC AND HYMNODY William T. Stead, in his “Hymns that Have Helped,” bears witness to the power of a hymn once deeply lodged in his memory: “It is Newton’s hymn, which begins, ‘Begone, unbelief.’ I can remember my mother singing it when I was a tiny boy, barely able to see over the book-ledge in the minister’s pew; and to this day, whenever I am in doleful dumps, and the stars in their courses appear to be fighting against me, that one doggerel verse comes back clear as a black- bird’s note through the morning mist.’’ An early American rhymed Psalter contains a quaint defense of the custom of setting the psalms to verse by insisting that verse is of lighter weight than the same bulk of prose, and therefore men find it easier to carry in their memories than prose. Furthermore, the hymn and its melody from their very nature tend to be more often repeated, not only in church worship but also in the home circle and in private devotion, than is the formal statement of belief, or the exposition of theology from the pulpit. Our favorite hymns thus become a part of ourselves, and thereby give expression to principles which, from our inner experience and study of the Word, we recognize to be true, although often without having previously defined them clearly in our thought. Martin Luther recognized this; and under his leadership hymn-singing attained its first widespread popularity among the people. With all Germany © singing the hymns of justification by faith to the stately German chorales, the protest against the doctrines as well as the pernicious practices of Rome THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS 131 was given a mighty impetus. Luther confessed that he won more converts by the use of hymns than by preaching. Likewise the Wesleyan Revival made effective use of the hymns of personal religious ex- perience, emphasizing the witness of the Spirit and the joyful assurance of acceptance. To those who see the: work of a Divine Providence through all the advances of history it appears to have been no accident that both Luther and the Wesleys, especially Charles, were poets and musicians. Other men had recognized, and even preached, the same truths upon which the Reformation and the Wesleyan Revival were founded; but Luther and the Wesleys were given not only the power to preach and to organize the spread of these essential truths, but also the ability to express them in poetry and music. In the selection of hymns there are two distinct tendencies that mark the work of the Hymnal Com- mission; firstly, the exclusion of hymns that are non- Methodistic in doctrine, and, secondly, the decrease in the proportion of credal hymns. As to the first of these, let us inquire what are the non-Methodistic doctrines which find expression in hymn form. Professor Warren, in classifying the theology of Methodism, admits of only four great dis- tinct and complete Christo-theological systems, all others being incomplete or self-inconsistent.t They are the Roman, the Calvinistic, the Lutheran, and the Wesleyan. Their differences are based upon “the 1 @f, “Systematische Theologie,” einheitlich behandelt, von Wm. F. Warren, Bremen, 1865, and “Centenary of American Methodism,” by Abel Stevens, D.D., New York, 1865. 132 MUSIC AND HYMNODY soteriological relations between God and man, as established by Christ.” The Romanists teach the salvation of a soul through the priestly power and the works of the Papal Church, introducing essentially pagan elements into their worship. Their faith has found noble expression in a wonderful body of hymns, most of them in the Latin. Their doctrinal hymns have, of course, not been admitted to any Protestant hymnal in their original form; but it is interesting to note that one of the most stirring war songs of modern Protestantism was written by a Roman Catholic poet, Dr. Faber, and is still sung by Romanists in its original form: Faith of our fathers! living still In spite of dungeon, fire, and sword. Oh! Ireland’s heart beats high with joy, "Whene’er they hear that glorious word. The third verse begins thus: Faith of our fathers! Mary’s prayers Shall keep our country fast to thee! Calvinism teaches the salvation of a soul only through foreordination, or the free action of God, decreed before the foundation of the world. Against this dogma and its corollaries the early Methodist preaching hurled its most effective polemics. Ac- cordingly, the Commission found itself under especial obligation to avoid those hymns which suggested the irresistible decrees of God, electing the souls of men to future life or future punishment without relation to character, and to admit in their stead those hymns THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS 183 which clearly teach the salvability of all souls accept- ing the salvation freely offered to all. As a distinct reaction against the tenets of Calvin- ism have developed the doctrines of Universalism, teaching that all souls are to be ultimately saved; and of Unitarianism, which has added to this the denial of the triune nature of God, and the consequent divine nature of Christ, as the only begotten Son of the Father. The atonement conditional only upon its acceptance, and other doctrines dear to Methodists, were thus denied. In their anxiety to escape any suggestion of Unitarianism, the Commission took slight offense at the phrase addressing the Deity as “Eternal Soul” in Richard Watson Gilder’s hymn (14), and Mr. Gilder, by vote of the Commission, was re- quested to change that phrase, which he naturally refused to do. The exclusion of Calvinistic and Unitarian doctrines from the Hymnal has not fostered any prejudice against sacred poets of these faiths, as is attested by the great popularity throughout Methodism of the hymns, “In the cross of Christ I glory,” by Sir John Bowring, and ‘Nearer, my God, to thee,” by Sarah Flower Adams, both Unitarians, and also “Rock of Ages,” by Augustus M. Toplady, the Calvinistic clergyman, who conducted such a bitter controversy with John Wesley. Lutheran theology has made the salvation of the world largely dependent upon the proper use of the means of grace, the Word, and the sacraments, thus overemphasizing the forms of the Church and their 134 MUSIC AND HYMNODY efficacy. Methodism has not been obliged to combat Lutheran doctrine so vigorously as Romanism and Calvinism, partly because the latter two systems have presented a greater contrast to the Wesleyan system than the former, and partly because Methodism and Lutheranism have not thrived so largely upon the same soil. Nevertheless, Methodist hymnology neces- sarily cannot teach the sufficiency of the means of grace in themselves, but instead must present the Church as a militant body of worshipers and witnesses, the Word as a shining light illumining divine truth (a figure employed in almost every hymn classed under “The Holy Scriptures’’), and the sacraments as a means of expressing and stimulating Christian faith. Neither attendance upon the church and its sacra- ments nor the reading of the Word in itself insures salvation. Our hymn (330) My hope is built on nothing less Than Jesus’ blood and righteousness, rebels against this teaching of salvation through the means of grace. In contrast to Romanism, Calvinism, and Lutheran- ism, the doctrine of Methodism, and, consequently, its hymnody, has taught that the salvation of a soul depends on “his own free action in respect to the enlightenment, renewing, and sanctifying inworkings of the Holy Spirit.” The phrase, Wesleyan doctrine, is not to be taken as including all of the beliefs held by the greatest Methodist hymn-writer, Charles Wesley; for there are a few points wherein he differed from THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS 135 his contemporaries and successors. Many of Charles Wesley’s hymns were excluded from the Hymnal which would have commended themselves to the Church but for their undue emphasis of the “second blessing.” The Commission was exceedingly cautious in admitting hymns upon sanctification that they might be thoroughly sound and orthodox. As a foil to rampant fanaticism on this subject, some of the Southern members of the Commission urged the omission from the Contents of the separate classifica- tion, “Entire Consecration and Perfect Love.” But, since sanctification is clearly a sound Wesleyan doctrine, the Commission at length was content to admit twenty-eight hymns to this section, in which the Methodist Episcopal Church in the preceding Hymnal had used seventy, and the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, forty-five. Most of these twenty-eight express a yearning, a hope, a prayer for sanctification. Eighteen were written by Charles Wesley and three are translations by John Wesley. So modified is the expression of this doctrine under “Entire Consecration and Perfect Love,” that this section raises the question as to the proper classifi- cation of some of the hymns. Nevertheless, our hymns have not slighted the orthodox doctrine of the Holy Spirit, as an illuminating, sin-dis- pelling, soul-warming influence, the Third Person of the Godhead. Some hymns were brought to the attention of the Commission but not admitted to the Hymnal because of their teaching as to the second coming of Christ. 136 MUSIC AND HYMNODY While Charles Wesley has hinted at this in his hymns, Methodism holds the belief that the Gospel through the Holy Spirit will conquer ¢he world without the reincarnation of Christ. The Seventh-Day Advent- ists have transformed our Christmas Hymn into a hymn upon the second coming of Christ by singing it thus: “ Joy to the world! the Lord will come, Let earth receive her King.” Likewise other classes of hymns were avoided, not so much because they involved questionable doctrine as because they offended delicacy, or genuine spon- taneous spiritual emotion, or sincerity of thought. The sentimental hymn is excluded from the Hymnal and left for what the Preface styles as “those un- authorized publications that often teach what organ- ized Methodism does not hold.” Again, the hymns in the ancient style of dwelling upon the physical tortures of the lost are fortunately no longer in use, such as: Eternal plagues and heavy chains, Tormenting racks and fiery coals, And darts t’ inflict immortal pains, Dipt in the blood of damnéd souls. The overascetic tone of some of the older hymns has not been regarded as being in accord with the full, rich life which should belong to an active Christian. Hence Methodism sings no more the doleful verses beginning, “How vain are all things here below!” which Isaac Watts wrote in a fit of despondency, in- duced by'a young woman’s refusal of his offer of THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS 137 marriage. John Newton’s “Let worldly minds the world pursue”’ is another of the many hymns dropped from the preceding Hymnals for this reason. Nor do American Methodists longer sing as of yore Charles Wesley’s lines: Thou such mercy hast bestowed On me, the vilest reptile, me. Modern taste revolts at the idea of a snake-like humanity. Literal references to the substitutional elements have been avoided, which make too prominent the physical side of Christ’s death at the expense of the deeper significance of his sacrifice, These were the chief doctrinal tests by which hymns were excluded, besides the literary deficiencies, which, as will be shown in the next chapter, caused the veto of most of _ the excluded hymns. The second tendency, distinctly traceable in the work of the Hymnal Commission, is the decrease in the relative number of credal hymns and the increase in the proportion of the hymns of practical religious life. Indeed, the whole trend of modern hymn-writing is away from the ultra-dogmatism, exemplified by Isaac Watts, and toward the expression of worship, devo- tion, and the joys of personal experience. Christian activity has been emphasized more than Christian belief. While on the negative side we have thus noted the banishment of non-Methodistic doctrine and, indeed, a decided decrease in the body of distinctly doctrinal hymns, there is upon the positive side a statement of 138 , MUSIC AND' HYMNODY practically all of the essential Wesleyan doctrines in our canons of sacred poetry. In her early days, when bitter controversy was rife, Methodism was obliged to stoutly defend the theological tenets of John Wesley and his fellow-preachers against the contentions of op- posing doctrines. While the rationale of the Wesleyan theological system has not altered since it was uttered by John Wesley, the spirit of the Church has advanced and its vision has broadened, but always in a manner to confirm rather than discredit the logic of our orig- inal doctrines. This can hardly be said of other evangelical denominations, whose creeds have suffered radical alteration. In the opinion of many the most able statement in recent years of Methodist creed, contained within the small compass of three hundred words, is that uttered by Bishop Andrews in thesEpiscopal Address of 1900, and effectively quoted by Bishop Goodsell in the Episcopal Address of 1908. Here, in concise and beautiful language, is presented the faith of Method- ism, every phrase and almost every word being freighted with great meaning. In order to show how fully our hymns coincide with our faith, we present in parallel columns each phrase of the creed and a line from some corresponding hymn, expressing the same thought. The numbers in parenthesis refer to the hymn from which the line is quoted: BisHop ANDREWS’s CREED THEOLOGY OF THE Hymns We believe in one living and God is the name my soul personal God, adores, The almighty Three, .the eternal One (80). THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS Bisnop ANDREWs’s CREED the Father Almighty, who in perfect wisdom, holiness, and love pervades, sustains, and rules the world which he has made. We believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son our Lord, in whom dwelt all the full- ness of the Godhead bodily. who was in glory with the Father before all worlds; who became flesh and dwelt among us, the brightness of the glory of God and the express image of his person; who died for sin, the just for the unjust, that he might bring man to God; 189 THEOLOGY OF THE Hymns No earthly father loves like thee (86). God is wisdom, God is love 88). The one Almighty Father (567). Perfect in power, in love, and purity (78). Thy voice produced the sea and spheres (80). Rules the bright worlds, and moves their frame (80). True Son of the Father (125). O Lord and Master of us all (128). True Godhead Incarnate, Omnipotent Word (125). Who from the Father’s bosom came (148). Thou didst leave thy throne (122). Pleased as man with men to appear (111). His head with radiant glories crowned (135) : The Father’s coeternal Son (153). Veiled in flesh the Godhead see (111). Bore all my sins upon the tree (153). And on his sinless soul Our sins in all their guilt were laid (155). Is crucified for me and you, To bring us rebels back to God (153). 140 Bisuop ANDREWs’s CREED who rose from the dead; who ascended on high, having received all power in heaven and earth, for the completion by grace and judgment of the kingdom of God. We believe in Ghost, very and eternal God, the Holy by whose operation on men dead in trespasses and sin they are quickened to repentance, faith, and loving obedience; are made aware of their son- ship with God, MUSIC AND HYMNODY THEOLOGY oF THE Hymns Our Lord is risen from the dead (158). The Lord is risen indeed; The grave hath lost its prey (157). Jesus, King of glory, is gone up on high (175). Jesus rules the world (177). The Lord Jehovah reigns, . . His truth confirms and seals the grace (81). Born to raise the sons of earth Born to give them second birth (111). Come, Holy Ghost, our hearts inspire (181). O Spirit of the living God! (188.) Thy Spirit can from dross refine, And melt and change this heart of mine (274). Whose Spirit breathes the active flame, Faith (298). Spirit of faith, come down (191). Holy Spirit, . .. Reign supreme and reign alone (185). His Spirit answers to the blood, And tells me I am born of God (301). THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS BisHop ANDREWS’s CREED and are empowered to rise into the full stature of men in Jesus Christ. We believe in the impartial love of God to the whole human family, so that none are excluded from the benefits thereof, except as they exclude them- selves by willful unbelief and sin. We believe that faith in Christ, the self-surrender of the soul to his government and grace, is the one condi- tion upon which man is re- conciled to God, is born again, . becomes partaker of the Di- vine Nature and attains sanctification through his Spirit. We accept the moral law, confirmed and perfected by the Divine Teacher, 141 THEOLOGY OF THE HyMNS Thy sanctifying Spirit... Make me pure from sin (378). And whosoever cometh IT will not cast him out (295). And pledged the blood divine To ransom every soul of man (243). Will ye slight His grace, and die? (247.) Give me the faith, that casts out sin, And purifies the heart (358). By faith I plunge me in this sea; Here is my hope, my joy, my rest (302). My God is reconciled! (301.) And tells me I am born of God (301). Rooted and fixed in God (375). Come, Holy Ghost, for thee I call... My steadfast soul, from fall- ing free, Shall then no longer move (375). I read my duty in thy word; But in thy life the law ap- pears, Drawn out in living charac- ters (140). 142 Bisuop ANDREWs’s CREED and set forth authoritatively in the Holy Scriptures, and we believe in the eternal consequences of good and evil inherent in the constitu- tion of the human soul, and declared with the utmost solemnity by him, the final Judge of human life. MUSIC AND HYMNODY THEOLOGY oF THE Hymns Thy word is everlasting truth; How pure is every page! That holy book shall guide .. « (204). Assured if I my trust betray, I shall forever die (388). And bid his guilty conscience dread The death that never dies (245). There are some lesser points of belief, or shades of meaning, in the Apostles’ Creed that Bishop Andrews’s creed does not specifically express, but which are clearly taught in our hymns. The Virgin Birth, for in- stance, is celebrated in hymns 111, 112, 117, 123, and 125. The resurrection of the body is taught in hymn 586, without prejudice upon the theological debate as to whether or not it is to be a physical or a spiritual body into which men shall be raised. In the following columns we have set corresponding hymns opposite some of the familiar phrases of the Apostles’ Creed, not emphasized in Bishop Andrews’s creed. AposTLes’ CREED Christ, the only Son Suffered (under Pontius Pi- late). Was crucified, dead and buried. THEOLOGY OF THE Hymns Of the Father’s Godhead true and only Son (166). Pierced and nailed him to the tree (601). So cone slept: God’s dying mn Passed through the grave, and blessed the bed (586). THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNS ApostTLes’ CREED The third day he rose. Sitteth on the right hand of God. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. The holy catholic Church. The communion of saints. The forgiveness of sins. The resurrection of the body. Life everlasting. 148 THEOLOGY oF THE Hymns "Tis thine own third morn- ing, Rise, O buried Lord (166). He sits at God’s right hand (178). Christ is coming! (602.) Thou awful Judge of quick and dead (600). One holy Church, one army strong (209). O blest communion, fellow- ship divine! We feebly struggle, they in glory shine; Yet all are one in thee, for all are thine (430). Praise him, who pardons all our sin (20). A glorious form Shall then ascend to meet the Lord (586). All meet thee in the blesséd home above, Thy everlasting home of peace and love (671). In God’s likeness, man awaking Knows the everlasting peace (160). Thus all the main points of our theology are ex- pressed in our hymns; and the great doctrines of the Methodist Episcopal Church are being chanted in the music of the sanctuary. CHAPTER VII THE LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS Rea Hymns, Truk Porms—Lecirmate Emorions— Diction anD IMAGERY—R#YTHM AND METER A RECENT work on hymnology proposes this state- ment: “A hymn is not necessarily a poem, while a poem that can be sung as a hymn is something more than a poem. Imagination makes poems; devotion makes hymns. There can be poetry without emotion, but ahymn never. A poem may argue; a hymn must not.” This passage is based upon a false conception of the true nature of poetry. It is not difficult to carry to the inevitable false conclusion the proposition that not all sacred poems are hymns, even those cast in the usual hymn meters. But in order to prove that good hymns are not always poems one must assume an unworthy definition for hymns, as well as for poetry. There can be no true poetry without emotion. One of the members of our Hymnal Commission, Dr. C. T. Winchester, professor of English literature in Wes- leyan University, has treated of the emotional element in poetry in his work on literary criticism.’ After quoting as representative of the modern conception the definitions of poetry uttered by Wordsworth, Shelley, Emerson, Browning, Leigh Hunt, Clarence Stedman, and Coleridge, all of whom recognized the ‘The Elements of Literary Criticism,” by Caleb T. Winchester, Litt.Doc. 144 LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 145 emotional element as essential to poetry, he expresses the results of their thought in the following passage: “We may define poetry as that variety of the literature of emotion which is written in metrical form. Or, aban- doning the strictly logical style of definition, we may say that poetry is that form of literature whose pur- pose is to appeal to the emotions, and which is written in metrical form.” A true hymn must be expressive of emotion, and somewhat in a universal sense, even though it be primarily the expression of a personal emotion. But this in itself is not enough. If the writer lack the ability or the inspiration for poetic expression, his most intense emotion may result in mere doggerel, as is too often the result. Such unpoetical rhymings, when uttering a great spiritual truth, may even pro- duce a certain quality of emotion among the young or those who are ignorant in literary taste. Asan example of the former, we find in William T. Stead’s book, “Hymns that Have Helped,” the following verses, which helped him most as a boy: His love in times past Forbids me to think He'll leave me at last In trouble to sink. Each sweet Ebenezer I have in review Confirms his good pleasure To help me quite through. In spite of its bad rhyme and questionable logic, which his later tastes would condemn, these verses still recur to him with all of their helpful associations from his 146 MUSIC AND HYMNODY early days as a source of comfort to him now. The principle of association of ideas will psychologically explain the fondness that many of us bear toward some hymns, in themselves altogether unworthy of admiration. They are linked with stirring episodes in our lives, or else have held a very dear place in our hearts before the time when our minds were awakened to the real beauties of literature. But this peculiarly personal fondness for a poor hymn is no argument whatsoever for its use in public worship; and against this danger we must conscientiously guard. As for those who are unable or unwilling to recognize the emotional content of a hymn, and are constantly foisting upon congregations and religious assemblies the latest batch of doggerel, meaningless for the most part, and awaking only the emotions of ridicule or pity among thoughtful people, their case seems to be as hopeless as it is illogical. It is not enough that a hymn be wrought out of some intense emotional experience; it must have the power to reproduce emotion, and, from the very nature of a true hymn, its appeal to the emotions must be more or less universal. When we add to this emotional quality the necessity of meter and rhythm, and these especially restricted to the most regular forms because of the demands of the music, we cannot escape the conclusion that good hymns must be poems. They form but a subdivision of that department of literature defined as sacred poetry. In general, it may be said that examples of nearly all the emotions expressed in other religious poetry may be found among the truehymns. But LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 147 the most effective hymns avoid some of the emotions, upon which broader forms of sacred poetry may dwell with propriety. Wherein much sacred poetry differs from the hymns may be seen as this discussion unfolds. Let us consider first the emotions which can be legitimately expressed by a hymn. In the first place, hymns may express the elemental emotions of either joy or grief. But in expressing or exciting grief through contemplation of the divine passion, through sorrow for sins, or through the suggestion of mourning for the dead, a hymn does not serve the highest emo- tional purpose in making grief a finality. It must at least direct the mind toward joy and its sources, such as our redemption through the cross, forgiveness of sins, and the higher meaning of sorrow and of the life beyond the grave. The following hymns are selected from many that beautifully illustrate the joyful pur- pose of a sorrowful hymn: “O sacred Head now wounded” (151), ‘““Return, O wanderer, return” (255), “Weep not for a brother deceased” (594). Most Christian hymns may be said to be written throughout in the strain of profound joy; but where this joy is superficial and thoughtless, as in many a camp-meet- ing chorus, the effect is somatic rather than spiritual, and the reaction that follows is usually harmful. Coming to the more complex and specialized forms of emotion, hymns may legitimately express such emotions as love, humility, sympathy, confidence or peace, and the feeling of social unity; but almost never their opposites—hatred, pride, scorn or ridicule, fear, and loneliness. In poems of wider scope, treat- 148 MUSIC AND HYMNODY ing of sacred themes, as Milton’s “Paradise Lost,” and Bickersteth’s “Yesterday, To-day, and Forever,” some of these opposites may be portrayed in the course of the narrative, though never as a dominant emotion. Among the abstract sentiments hymnology ex- presses nearly the whole gamut of these emotions. The feelings, arising respectively from the perception of Truth, of Beauty, and of Right, may all be—indeed, should all be—stirred simultaneously in the singing of a hymn, each awakened by a different element of the hymn. In so far as the intellect perceives that the language of the hymn declares Truth, the pleasure of the logical element is stirred. In so far as the poem and its music appeal to our tastes as an artistic work of real Beauty our esthetic pleasure is stimulated. In so far as we recognize the hymn as clearly pointing to us the path of our personal duty our moral sentiments are aroused. A defect in any one of these elements, an error from truth, an inartistic expression in poetry or music, a moral blemish in the thought, will at once vitiate the effect of the whole hymn in proportion as the defect is recognized; for, if any one of these senti- ments is outraged, it will serve to create a sense of incongruity, an emotional discord, that is fatal to the very purpose of hymn-singing. The sense of ridicule rather than devotion is aroused by the incongruity of such lines as the ancient hymn verse, known to some of our grandfathers: Ye monsters from the bubbling deep, Your Master’s praises spout; And from the sands ye coddlings peep, And wag your tails about. LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 149 A generation that laid especial stress upon future eternal punishment produced this horrible verse, by Wigglesworth, on heathen and infant damnation: They wring their hands, their caitiff hands, And gnash their teeth for terror, They cry, they roar for anguish sore, And gnaw their tongues for horror. This revolting picture, besides shocking the imagina- tion, outrages our sense of truth and divine justice in consigning infants and heathen to suffer infinite tor- ture because of the limitations of their age or environ- ment. Likewise those hymns that exhort to holiness for the sake of the rewards after death excite our con- tempt because, however beautiful they may be in other respects, they fall far short of the high ethical motives for holiness that Saint Francis Xavier ex- pressed in the ancient hymn: My God, I love thee, not because I hope for heaven thereby, Nor yet because, if I love not, I must forever die. In each of these examples of faulty hymns the emo- | tional defect has made it impossible for use. A : necessary condition for all literary excellence ik poetry, and a necessary condition for the highest” spiritual dynamics in hymn-singing, is the blending of all the emotions involved into a harmonious ‘unity. Professor George A. Coe in his psychological study, “The Spiritual Life,’ has uttered a forceful protest against the temperamental interpretation of the 150 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Christian life, such as is too often presented by the Church. In a brief but valuable passage on ‘some psychological aspects of hymnology” he has shown how this one-sidedness is reflected in our hymns. Declaring that a difference in the quality of emotion is of much greater importance than a difference in intensity, he classifies the hymns according to their emotional attitude into two divisions. The first, by far the greatest in volume, represents the subjective attitude, the treatment of the religious life from the standpoint of personal experience, of introspection, of self-consciousness. The second, which by its paucity of expression seems to be greatly neglected, is the ob- jective attitude, the expression of the religious life in practical activities, in good works, in Christian deeds. His statistics, based upon the former Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, prove .a better case than can be shown by the present Hymnal, for the Joint Hymnal Commission seems to have had his criticism somewhat in mind. We still find, however, that of the total number of hymns only 269 are under the heading of “Christian Activity and Zeal’’ (nearly one fifth more of the whole than the old Hymnal contained). The hymns of “Christian Activity” in the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Hymnal appear to be in about the same proportion as in the Methodist Episco- pal Hymnal examined by Professor Coe. Of the forty- seven hymns on “Christian Activity” in the old Method- ist’ Episcopal Hymnal he found only nine treating “Activity” objectively, directing the attention to the things to be done, to the activity itself; and thirty- LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 151 .two treating “Activity” subjectively from the stand- point of one’s emotions during activity, while six were mixed or indeterminate. 5 Examples of objective treatment of “Activity” are: “Forward! be our watchword” (384), ‘Hark, the voice of Jesus calling’’ (402), the second verse of which was added in the new Hymnal to the two verses in both the old Hymnals: If you cannot cross the ocean, And the heathen lands explore, You can find the heathen nearer, You can help them at your door. If you cannot give your thousands, You can give the widow’s mite, And the least you give for Jesus Will be precious in his sight. Examples of subjective treatment of “Activity” are: “Am Ia soldier of the cross’ (393), dwelling upon blushes and fears and a study of the fighter’s emotions rather than the activity itself: “‘Workman of God! O lose not heart” (392), and ‘Awake, our souls! away, our ' fears!” (405,) cheering against “trembling. thought,” mortal spirits that tire and faint, “native strength” that “shall melt away, and droop, and die.” It is not to be assumed that such hymns as these last, treating activity subjectively, are false in their emotion, or are undesirable in a hymn collection. Only the great disproportion between these and the other class of hymns on “Activity” itself is to be deplored. We find that eight of the nine hymns in the old Methodist Episcopal Hymnal, treating “Activity” 152 MUSIC AND HYMNODY objectively are included in the new Hymnal; and most of the hymns treating “Activity” subjectively have been dropped. Thus far there isa gain. But of the seventeen new hymns under this heading only three may be regarded as strictly objective. Sum- ming up these statistics, we find that less than one fifth of the hymns in the former book on “Activity” are objective, but in the new Hymnal more than one quarter. In the old Hymnal the hymns dealing with any kind of church work form less than half of those classified under ‘The Church,” in the new Hymnal they form two thirds of the hymns on the subjects formerly classified under ‘The Church.” In the old Hymnal the hymns on Christ’s life and character formed less than ten per cent of the body of hymns on the subject of Christ; in the new Hymnal they form over twenty per cent. Thus, in the objective treat- ment of “Christian Activity,” “The Church,” and the life of Christ in the new Hymnal there has been a dis- tinct gain. That it is an insufficient gain is partly due to the scarcity of good objective hymns. While it is true that emotion is a criterion of good poetry, and, consequently, of good hymns, it is not begging the question to say that the intensity, and to some extent the quality, of the poetical emotion of a hymn is often determined by the poet’s choice of words, for in the English language there are always many different ways of expressing the same spiritual truth. The legitimate vocabulary of hymns is greatly circumscribed in both of two opposite directions. At LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 153 one extreme a great number of prosaic words, and a still greater number of prosaic phrases, perfectly legitimate in prose, are entirely out of place in poetry, and, therefore, inhymns. Their commonplace nature revolts against the art of hymnodic expression. At the other extreme there is a wealth of poetic diction, preciose words, ornate expressions, and elaborate, fanciful figures of speech, perfectly allowable in most poetry, but never in hymns. They dilute the spiritual emotion of the hymn, or divert the thought of common worship. Our Hymnal is singularly free from either vulgar or over-elaborate diction, because of the true literary standards upon which the work of the Hymnal Com- mission is based. Nevertheless, within the limits of good taste both simple and elaborate methods may be observed in the literary style of our hymns. The older hymn-writers preferred the former method. Their hymns, that have survived to present-day use, are marked by the simple, familiar English phraseol- ogy, such as in the German vernacular Martin Luther commended and employed with great success. An examination of Isaac Watts’s hymns will illustrate to the reader this simplicity of diction, in which most of the old Psalm translations were made. While Charles Wesley’s vocabulary was much more extended that Watts’s, even within the same number of hymns, it is largely confined to strong, simple words, though nearly always in the best and purest English, and in the less ambitious figures of speech. The conscious self-restraint of these two foremost 154 MUSIC AND HYMNODY hymn-writers of the eighteenth century is also to be observed in their contemporaries. This earlier school demonstrated that noble, majestic, thrilling hymns can be wrought out of simple words and figures. Possibly this may have given rise to the idea that hymns need not be poetic. Nevertheless, there is a true poetry in their austere chants that has stirred the spiritual emotions of many generations of men. The modern hymn-writers, on the other hand, have greatly enlarged the vocabulary of hymnody, albeit within the bounds of propriety; and, furthermore, they have adopted a much wider range of imagery than their predecessors, who did not entirely scorn, however, the poetic figures of speech. Our hymns abound in rich imagery. The doctrinal thought is intensified by an appeal to the imagination through the memory of.all five senses. The sense of hearing is representatively awakened in the lines: Far, far away, like bells at evening pealing, The voice of Jesus sounds o’er land and sea (621); of touch: Thy touch has still its ancient power (54); Jesus can make a dying-bed Feel soft as downy pillows are (Watts, 581): of taste: His purposes will ripen fast, Unfolding every hour: The bud may have a bitter taste, But sweet will be the flower (96); of smell: Our thoughts and thanks may rise As grateful incense to the skies (70); LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 155 of sight: Enthroned amid the radiant spheres, He glory like a garment wears; To form a robe of light divine, Ten thousand suns around him shine (23). Through the vision of some bit of color the poet fre- quently portrays the deeper meaning of his thought. Thus we behold the royal richness of the coming of the morning: Still, still with thee, when purple morning breaketh (43); When morning gilds the skies (32). Redemption through sorrow flames in the lines: His blood-red banner streams afar (416), and ; I lay in dust life’s glory dead, And from the ground there blossoms red Life that shall endless be (481); or the dazzling purity of the saints in heaven: Who are these arrayed in white Brighter than the noon-day sun? (619.) In the night scenes of the Hymnal our sacred poets have given to us some of the most beautiful imagery that appeals to the sense of vision. What a picture Walter Scott has made of Israel’s Divine Guide through the wilderness!— By day, along th’ astonished lands, The cloudy pillar glided slow; By night, Arabia’s crimsoned sands Returned the fiery column’s glow (95). 156 MUSIC AND HYMNODY The heavenly firmament by night, that inspired the second verse of Addison’s hymn, Soon as the evening shades prevail, The moon takes up the wondrous tale (84), and Sir Robert Grant’s hymn (203), employing the selfsame imagery, gives beauty to the thought of these lines: Thou who hast sown the sky with stars, setting thy thoughts in gold (714). Wait and worship, while the niglit Sets her evening lamps alight Through all the sky (57). He paints the wayside flower He lights the evening star (716). Something of the wonder of night is deepened in the poetic descriptions of the first Christmas night, as in the old carol, “Silent Night,” or J. G. Holland’s poem, “And the star rains its fire while the beautiful sing” (112). Contrasted with this stands the loneliness of night: Cold mountains and the midnight air Witness the fervor of thy prayer (140), and the symbolism of darkness: Thy tender mercies shall illume The midnight of the soul (446), Our midnight is thy smile withdrawn (82), Ashamed of Jesus! sooner far Let evening blush to own a star (443). Charles Wesley’s hymn, suggested by a night scene, “See how great a flame aspires” (643), abounds in LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 157 imagery; but the figure is changed in each verse, and that which is represented by a fire in the first verse is symbolized by a shower in the last. There is a startling vividness in some of the exqui- site images in miniature: The lightning-rifts disclose his throne (686), The tumult of our life’s wild restless sea (545), When trouble, like a gloomy cloud (539), The darksome prison-house of sin (654), Like some bright dream that comes unsought (537), A long familiarity with old hymns sometimes dulls our appreciation of their imagery, as for instance Addi- son’s biographical metaphor: When in the slippery paths of youth With heedless steps I ran (105), and Sir John Bowring’s thrilling lines: In the Cross of Christ I glory, Towering o’er the wrecks of time (143). Much of the familiar, rich imagery of the Scriptures has been embodied in our hymns, adding to the beauty and strength of the thought. The Scriptures are represented as the “lamp of our feet” (205); the Eucharist, “Bread of heaven, wine of gladness’”’ (235); aspiration, “As pants the hart for cooling streams’’ (316); and the Church, A mountain that shall fill the earth, A house not made with hands (214). 158 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Nathaniel P. Willis draws from Holy Writ his picture of creation: The mountains in their places stood, The sea, the sky; and all was good; And when its first pure praises rang, The morning stars together sang (660). Likewise Dr. Bickersteth’s conception of life gives a biblical picture of the out-of-doors: Our years are like the shadows On sunny hills that lie, Or grasses in the meadows ‘That blossom but to die (18). As hymns are essentially reflective or hortatory, they afford little opportunity for the description of people, or personal episodes. But the few touches of this description in the Hymnal are drawn with vigor and beauty. It is true poetry that can flash such clear pictures in so few words as may be found in these lines: Where at sultry noon, thy Son Sat weary by the patriarch’s well (12), When glory beamed from Moses’ brow (187), In simple trust like theirs who heard, Beside the Syrian sea The gracious calling of the Lord (548). In the missionary hymns by a poetic touch of the imagination we are carried in a trice to distant lands. The realm of Mohammedanism is suggestively de- seribed thus: Where the lofty minaret Gleams along the morning skies, Wave it till the crescent set, And the Star of Jacob rise (640). LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 159 Within the compass of a few lines (655) Bishop Heber carries us to “Greenland’s icy mountains,” “India’s coral strand,” “Where Afric’s sunny fountains roll down their golden sand,” “many an ancient river,”’ “many an ancient: palm,” the land where “spicy breezes” “blow soft o’er Ceylon’s isle”; in fact, sug- gesting the whole earth, through which the gospel must be borne until ‘it spreads from pole to pole.”’ From the very limitations of hymnody there is little freedom offered for dramatic development. A few of the hymns suggest dialogue in their questions and answers. ‘‘Watchman, tell us of the night” (636) is a dialogue throughout, each couplet alternately being the words of either the Traveler or the Watchman. This is marked by the device of placing the first word of each two lines in the vocative. Thus, we read: Watchman, tell us of the night, What its signs of promise are,’ to which the Watchman replies: Traveler, o’er yon mountain’s height See that glory-beaming star! Thus the conversation proceeds dramatically through the whole hymn. Another hymn of questions and answers is the ancient Greek hymn (293): Art thou weary, art thou languid, Art thou sore distressed? to which the reply comes with a flood of comfort and love: Come to me, saith One, and, coming, Be at rest. 160 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Each verse of the hymn is patterned after this design. In the Hymnal under the division “The Gospel,” we find that the hymns sounding forth “The Need of Salvation” and “Warnings and Invitations” speak with dramatic emphasis. Eight of the first dozen hymns in this section ask startling questions to awaken the slumbering conscience. Charles Wesley’s great hymn, “Come, O thou Traveler unknown” is a thrilling drama in miniature; and, though the hymn utters the words of but one of the two wrestlers in that battle of love, the action throughout is intense, and the progress of the contest is followed at every step. The metrical forms into which is molded: the poetry of hymns are comparatively few. This is due to the limitations of the hymn tunes, their musical form, and the impossibility of repeating words and phrases, as in song form, except in the refrain. A few unusual meters creep into our hymnody, for which tunes must be especially constructed, sometimes successfully, as “Lead, kindly Light,” or “Be strong!” (407), and sometimes not so successfully. The stately hymn meters progress nearly always through lines of many syllables. Aside from the short meter poems (6. 6. 8. 6.), only a small percentage (less than eight per cent) of the hymns begin with a line less than seven syllables, while the average line of the whole collection is nearly eight. The rhythm is also marked with stateliness and dignity, as befitting the LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 161 subjects of hymnody. With the exceptions noted later in this chapter, our hymns are based almost entirely upon the two-beat rhythm, two syllables occurring in each foot of meter. This rhythm is dis- tinctly recognized by authorities as fitting to the poetry of reflection, in contrast to the poetry of narra- tive and motion." On this two-beat rhythm are built our most popular metrical forms—common meter, long meter, and short meter. Long meter is uniformly made of eight- syllable lines, each containing four feet of two beats to each foot: ~ —|~—]J~—|-~—| Of its various forms there are 114 examples, besides 7 with refrain added. Of common meter the first and third lines are of eight syllables each, as in long meter, but the second and fourth are of only six syllables. This is said to be the feeblest of the meters for gen- eral poetic use. Of its four, six, and eight-line verses there are 114 examples in the Hymnal. : st oe | Y es | ~ —| ~ = ~t|vtivsi Short meter is so called because the syllables of each four-line verse are in the order of 6. 6. 8. 6.; and of these there are 36 examples, besides 8 with a refrain. a ee |e | , / , ‘ el ee eS , , , It is to be regretted that in the Metrical Index the 1“The Musical Basis of Verse,” by J. P. Dabney. Longmans, Green & Co., 1911, pp. 66 et seg. 162 MUSIC AND HYMNODY full names of these three meters are not given, but only their initial letters. The C. P. M., L. P. M. and H. M. of the Methodist Episcopal Hymnal have, fortunately, given place to the more definite terms, 8. 8. 6. Double, 8. 8. 8. Double and 6. 6. 6. 6. 8. 8. re- spectively. A brief study of the Metrical Index, which, by the way, should be mastered by everyone conducting worship regularly, will soon familiarize the student with the metrical forms there enumerated. The numbers at the top of each group refer to the number of syllables in the successive lines, recurring in regular order. For example, if you will count the syllables in ‘Angel Voices,” in hymn 27, you will find that the lines of each verse arrange themselves in the number of syllables they contain, as follows: 8. 5. 8. 5. 8. 4. 3., which is the heading under which the hymn and tune are classed. -The word “Double” and the “s” pluralizing the number to which it is attached, and the letter “1” for “lines,” merely refer to the number of lines, in which the number-schemes of the syllables are repeated. With these few rules in mind, a glance at the ninety-one different metrical forms specified will satisfy one that there are not many radical differences in meter. The long, common, and short meters are closely related, as we have seen. Now, when the weak syllable is omitted from the long meter line, and the stronger “direct attack” is made we get the 7s meter. Sometimes alternate lines have feminine rhymes (or double syllables that rhyme). Thus, about two thirds of our 8s 7s hymns rhyme on the odd lines (double), as LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 163 well as on the even, as “In the cross of Christ I glory’ (143), while the other one third end in an unrhyming double syllable. ‘The King of love my Shepherd is” (136) serves as a rare illustration of the feminine rhymes in the second and fourth lines of the stanza. Of this two-beat rhythm the noblest form is the 10s. Well suited to heroics, as well as to lofty religious thought, it is inappropriate for frivolous, dainty, or light expressions. Of slightly varying forms of this meter there are several illustrations in the Hymnal. Besides the ninety-one meters enumerated in the Index, there is a double classification, P. M., called “Particular Meter’ (or ‘Peculiar Meter,’’ as some have it), and P. M. with Refrain, serving as a sort of wastebasket, into which an editor can throw all the meters that are left over. For this reason it should have been placed at the very end of the Metrical In- dex, as in the Hutchins, Parker, Tucker, and other hymnals. The purpose of a metrical index is to enable a pastor or choirmaster to quickly choose for any given hymn a different tune from the one to which it is set, but of the same meter. For this particular purpose the P. M. group is utterly useless, and it is surprising that no hymnal has ever labeled the P. M. wastebasket as useless in that respect, warning us that hymns under this heading, far from being all of the same meter, are, in fact, none of them of the same meter. Besides the inaccuracies in the Metrical Index, some of its classifications are misleading. In this respect, it is true, our’ Hymnal is following the bad 164 MUSIC AND HYMNODY precedent set by most of the best hymnals, which should some day be overruled. But who, for in- stance, cares to sing “Sweet hour of prayer” to the tune “Contrast”? They have the same number of syllables, and are both classed as ‘8s Double’; but the hymn is a double rhythm and the tune is a triple rhythm. Who would sing Kipling’s “Recessional”’ to the 8. 8. 8. Double tune “Nashville,” even though they are both classed as “8s 6 lines’; or “Welcome, happy morning!” to the tunes of “The Lord is my Shepherd”; or “Come unto me when shadows” to the tune of ‘“‘True-hearted, whole-hearted”; or “Long years ago o’er Bethlehem’s hill’ to the tune “‘Bethle- hem”? And yet each one of these couples is grouped under the one metrical heading, thus defeating the very purpose of the Metrical Index. Apropos of this last tune, beware of the “Irregulars” in this Index! Except for the word ‘Mary,” Phillips ‘Brooks’s poem, to which our tunes “Bethlehem” and “Saint Louis’ are set, is clearly a 8. 6. 8. 6. 7. 6. 8. 6. hymn; and is not 8s 6s Double. The other tunes under this heading have a refrain. “Amsterdam”’ is not irregular, but is a regular 7. 6. 7. 6. 7. 7. 7. 6. tune. And “Epiphany” deserves only the awkward metrical title 10. 11. 11. 11. 12. 11. 10. 11”; but is regular aceording to that scheme. As for hymns with refrains, both ‘Paradise’ tunes use refrains, as do also five of the plain P. M. tunes, although “Beyond” is classed under “ P. M. with Re- frain.” It might be advisable for a hymnal using a score of hymns with refrains to group these together LITERARY BEAUTIES OF THE HYMNS 165 under a note that they are not interchangeable, in- stead of making nearly as many separate metrical headings. There is a class of genuinely irregular tunes to be found among the nondescripts of P. M. Every verse of the regular meters conforms to a given scheme; but the verses of the irregular forms are mutually incon- sistent, and to guide the singer the notes of the music must be tied, using in some verses, but not in others, one note to each syllable. This we see in the tune “Elliott.” But in singing the words of the hymn, “Thou didst leave thy throne,” a congregation is very apt to become confused as to which syllables are to be sung to the tied notes. As it is written, there are two ways of singing either the first or the second lines of the last verse; and the usual confusion at this point sometimes not only confuses a congregation but in- evitably drives them to a painfully false accent. The tune “Cary” fits well the first verse of “One sweetly solemn thought,” but compels us to accent the ulti- mate of each bisyllabic word in the last lines of the third verse with ludicrous effect: Near-er’ leav-ing’ the cross, Near-er’ gain-ing’ the crown. This fault is intrinsic in the irregularity of the poetical meter, although R. S. Ambrose’s famous melody to these words avoids this difficulty somewhat. These irregularities but emphasize the fact that hymn meters should be confined to strict limitations, and to be successful must easily yield to regular scansion, 166 MUSIC AND HYMNODY each foot containing the same number of syllables as the corresponding feet in other verses. While meter and emotional expression are essential to poetry, the meter must always be subordinate to the emotion. To inquire into the emotional fitness of certain meters among our hymns would lead us too far afield. Let one illustration suffice to mark the prin- ciple—the appropriateness of the more active three- beat rhythm to joyous themes. There are but few poems in the Hymnal using the three-beat rhythm. The .twenty hymns whose meter is composed of the various combinations of 6s and 4s are all reducible to triple rhythm, such as “America” and ‘More love to thee, O Christ.” About one third of the remaining hymns of this rhythm are to be found in the group of hymns expressing the joy of Christmas time, as “There’s a song in the.air,” which sustains the triple beat throughout; “In the field with their flocks abid- ing”; and “Silent Night,” which bears only a gentle suggestion of this rhythm. Nearly all of the other triple-beat hymns in the Hymnal express a joyous theme in this joyous rhythm, as “O how happy are they,” “True-hearted, whole-hearted,” “Lift your glad voices,” “Come, let us anew our journey pursue,” “O Thou, in whose presence my soul takes delight.” Thus emotion and rhythm conspire to make beau- tiful the poetry of our Hymnal. PART ITI THE TUNES 167 CHAPTER VIII THE STORY OF THE TUNES AND THEIR COMPOSERS Earty Musica, Hisrory—ContinenTaAL Composers—Bnrit- IsH ComposERS—AMERICAN ComposeRs—NEw TuNnEs— Rewation or Some Hymn Tunes To Larcer Forms. THE story of the hymn tunes has not been told so fully as the story of the hymns, save as it has ap- peared incidental to the general history of music. Hymnology has called forth hundreds of volumes to tell its story, while the history of the tunes can claim but comparatively few. Nor is this to be marveled at, when it is considered that hymn-writing is ancient, but music and, consequently, hymn-tune writing in its developed form make distinctly a modern art. During many centuries in Europe the history of music was simply the history of church music. This was largely true also of early American music, which made its first progress through anthems and hymn tunes, just as our earliest government itself followed ecclesi- astical principles. The Methodist Hymnal contains melodies from nearly every important period and school of' hymn-tune writing, as we shall see in the illustrations that follow. Pope Gregory (A. D. 590) placed the imprint of his genius upon the crude musical system of his day by adding new scales or modes to those that had already been devised by Saint Ambrose, and by reducing the 169 170 MUSIC AND HYMNODY whole to a more logical system. As a result, the Gregorian tones have ever since been the foundation of the Roman Catholic Church music. Of this ancient Gregorian plain-song the Methodist Hymnal contains little else besides a chant drawn from one of the Gregorian tones, ‘Nunc Dimittis” (733) and a hymn tune “Olmutz” (227), arranged from the Gregorian by Lowell Mason. The old Latin melody (477), based upon five adjacent tones, was probably derived from the Gregorian music. These melodies, now clothed in modern harmony and rounded with a modern cadence, were originally sung only in unison, like all the music of this early homophonic era. The popular idea that the melody “Crusader’s Hymn” belongs to this period is incorrect. By the innovations of Hucbald in the tenth century, and Guido of Arezzo a,century later, both of them pious monks, sacred words came to be sung upon two notes at the same time, instead of only one as before, and from this the harmony developed through successive centuries into an elaborate polyphony (710A + @dvoc, having “many tones”), until it was simplified and perfected by the genius of Palestrina (1524-94). The Palestrina mass is still the model of beauty in the worship of the Roman Catholic Church throughout the world. Until the Reformation, church music was entirely in the hands of the clergy and their trained musicians. It was left to Martin Luther, assisted by the musician Walther, to bring worship song to the people them- selves by means of the German chorale, simple in THE STORY OF THE TUNES 171 melody, strong in harmony, and set to the familiar words of the vernacular, instead of the Latin. Hymn- singing had already been employed to a limited degree among the Bohemian Brethren and other sects; but now it became universal throughout the Reformed Church. This may be regarded as the beginning of the modern hymn tune. Among the oldest examples of the German chorale in the Hymnal are “Ein’ Feste Burg” (101), ascribed to Martin Luther; ‘Munich” (151), rearranged by Mendelssohn from an old chorale; the ‘Passion Cho- rale” (151) of Hans Leo Hassler and the chorale of Nicolaus Decius, of which we have two arrangements, “Decius” (93) and ‘St. Peter” (97). The German com- posers of the seventeenth century followed the same general style of chorale writing in “Nuremberg” (103), by Johann Rudolf Ahle (1625-73); “Nun Danket”’ (30), by Johann Criiger (1598-1662) ; “Bremen” (476), by Georg Neumark (1621-81); and “St. Theodulph” (31), by Melchior Teschner (about 1613). By playing these tunes, even amateur musicians can easily recog- nize the elements common to the German chorales, distinguishing them from the work of other schools, by a dignity of movement and a Doric simplicity of harmony, expressing a calm but lofty state of re- ligious feeling. No frivolous verses can well be sung to these stately measures, no thought can be appro- priate, save that which finds deep root in the soul life. Later composers have given to us genuine chorales of great worth, though in their day already observing the beginnings of a different type of hymn tune, The Chris-tian! up and smite them, Counting gain but loss; 2. Inthe strength that com-eth By the ho- ly cross. A-MEN, 222 MUSIC AND HYMNODY verse), and light (third verse). The cautious and the spirited rhythms, the plaintive and the joyful melodies contrasted in the two parts of this tune, bring the invitation and the acceptance into strong musical relief. Even within the second half, the climax which the music develops corresponds exactly with that of the words, both reaching their culmination in the third measure from the end on the words “resting place,” ‘soul revived,” and “‘ife.”’ There is somewhat of a contrast, though not so marked, within some of the verses of Charles Wesley’s “Jesus, Lover of my soul.”’ In the first half of the first verse “waters roll” and “tempest high” are compared with ‘‘storm of life is past’’ in the second half; likewise in the second verse “helpless soul, alone’’ contrasts with “my trust, my help.” Here, as in the preceding examples, the contrast ‘is reproduced in the music of Jaseph Barnby’s tune “St. Fabian” (463) by setting the first half in G minor and the second half in G major. Although the sequence of emotions within a verse cannot always be reflected in the music, for the reasons cited above, a good hymn tune should portray, or at least be consistent with, the dominant emotion of the hymn. Various elements conspire to produce this harmony between words and music. Let us consider first the use of the minor mode. In the present Hymnal there are nineteen tunes using the minor. Eight of these begin in the minor and end in the major (Nos. 151—second tune, 304, 403, 464, 485, 616, 747). The other eleven begin and end also in the minor (Nos. 4, 152, 155, 254, 270, 273, 380, DESCRIPTIVE MUSIC 223 476, 580, 595, 603). It is no accident that ten of these melodies of the minor mode are set to hymns under the following classifications: ‘“Sufferings and Death of Christ,” “Warnings and Invitations,” “Repentance,” “Brevity and Uncertainty of Life,” “Death, and Judgment” (“Day of Wrath”), subjects that lend themselves most appropriately to the minor mode. Four of these we have already cited (Nos. 304, 464, 485, 616). Of the remaining five hymns the first lines suggest the reasons for setting them to tunes of the minor mode. They are: “O bitter shame and sor- sow” (380); “Defend us, Lord, from every ill’ (403); “Slowly, slowly darkening,” the sunset of life (464); “Leave God to order all thy ways, . . . in the evil days” (476); and-“The God of Abraham praise’’(4). This last hymn tune, the naming of which we have re- ferred to elsewhere, is a Hebrew melody, and is natur- ally in the minor mode, which predominates in Hebrew music. Besides these melodies that are distinctly in the minor, there are several hymn tunes that contain so many chords based upon the minor triads that they partake somewhat of that plaintive effect so charac- teristic of the minor mode. Of this class we give but a . few of the many examples: ‘‘Asleep in Jesus’’ (583), “Mourn for the thousands slain” (698), “O that I could repent” (265). The first line of each of these hymns proclaims its appropriateness to a tune with minor harmonies. : A tender, plaintive effect is produced by the use of a series of consecutive thirds in the upper parts;. that 224 MUSIC AND HYMNODY is, the soprano and alto singing in parallel lines only two notes apart. This is made especially effective by ending the tune on the third note of the scale, as may be felt in hearing the following examples: ‘‘When I survey the wondrous cross” (141); “Jesus, thy blood and righteousness”—Sufferings and Death of Christ (148); “O that I could repent” (265); “One sweetly solemn thought” (620). To these may be added “By cool Siloam’s shady rill” (678) as fitting to the tender suggestions of childhood for the reason just stated. There are also a number of hymns that successfully use the series of consecutive thirds to produce plain- tive effects which end on the tonic, or first note in the scale, as, for instance, the communion hymn (239); “Q Love divine, that stooped to share, Our sharpest pang” (457); “Unveil thy bosom, faithful tomb” (586); “Shall man, O God of light and life, Forever molder in the grave?” (596.) The martial hymns, calling to arms, are usually set to music having a firm and even rhythm. The inter- vals are wider than in the intervals of prayer tunes, and the melody tends to follow the chord-lines, as we are reminded by the tunes set to “Go forward, Christian soldier’ (387); ‘Soldiers of the cross, arise” (385); “Onward, Christian soldiers!” (883); and “We march, we march to victory” (418). In the last two examples the bass, especially in the chorus, seems to imitate the tramping of soldiers. A peculiar device to represent a trumpet call is often used in music, and it appears in some of our martial hymn tunes. It may be described in tech- DESCRIPTIVE MUSIC 225 nical terms of harmony as follows: While the soprano is descending three whole tones, some other part, as the alto or bass, also descends, making a major third with the first note of the soprano, a perfect. fifth with the second, and a minor sixth with the third, and the same intervals with the same notes as they ascend to the original note, thus: For ward in - to bat - tle!.. ~ 1. My soul, be on thy guard. You may hear this trumpet call in these two ex- amples taken respectively from the thirteenth and fourteenth measures of “Onward, Christian soldiers!’ (383) between the soprano and bass to the words, “Forward into battle,” and from the first six chords of “My soul be on thy guard” (493—first tune). We choose to believe that this device was not used in these places by chance. A striking characteristic of the tunes of the morn- ing hymns is that the melody tends to ascend. 226 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Naturally, it cannot ascend on every step, but there is a distinct upward tendency that may be easily recognized in the following examples: ‘When morn- ing gilds the skies” (32), ‘Hail to the Sabbath day” (66), “Welcome, delightful morn” (67—second tune), “O day of rest and gladness” (68), “Lord of the Sabbath, hear our vows” (73). If we regard Addi- son’s “The spacious firmament on high” (84) as a hymn on the morning of creation, Haydn’s melody may. then ‘be said to be an excellent example of the upward tendency of the morning hymn. All of this is not without its psychological reason; for as the sun ascends the sky, and as our bodies rise from rest and sleep, so our consciousness and emotional life in the morning feels the upward tendency of the beginning of the day.. c For the converse- reason the melodies of the evening hymns tend to descend. When the flowers are closing and the sunlight is fading,.our conscious- ness descends toward quiet and repose. A reflection of this “shadow of turning’? may be seen in the following examples, in which should be observed also two other characteristics of the evening hymn— a fuller use of the chord of the dominant seventh, and also a very narrow range for the melody. The plaintive effect of the dominant seventh is akin to the pensive sadness of the twilight hour. The upper notes of melody are less singable when mind and body are approaching a state of rest, when our lungs inhale less deeply, and our emotions are quieter. ‘Abide with me” (50), which illustrates all DESCRIPTIVE MUSIC 227 of these points, does not in melody wander beyond the interval of a fifth. Likewise the whole melody of “Now the day is over” (59) is confined within the interval of a fourth, and not more than five of the twenty-four notes lie beyond E and F. “Slowly, slowly darkening’ (464—second tune) is also within the range of a fourth, save for two low notes at the end. ‘Peace, perfect peace” (528), a hymn for the evening of life, contains twenty-one notes, and all but seven of these are on G or A. This same dif- ference in the range of the melody may be observed between joyful and sad melodies, and between vig- orous and quiet tunes. The contrast between conjunct and disjunct melody should represent a wider difference of emo- tional content in our hymn tunes than is sometimes observed by composers and editors. Our Hymnal contains many excellent examples of this distinction. Disjunct melody follows, for the most part, the chord-line, using intervals that are as wide as the intervals of the chord, so that if several successive notes of the melody are sounded simultaneously, they form a good chord. Some of the best examples re: “Dennis” (100), ‘Regent Square” (25), ‘“Pleyel’s Hymn” (35 and 248), “Horton” (248), “Consecra- tion” (348), “Geer” (376), “Gratitude’’ (410), “Mait- land” (557), “Jewett” (524), “Warwick” (41), “Nicwa” (78). The hymns to which these disjunct melodies are set usually express sentiments of joy, contentment, activity or exaltation of spirit. And’ where these express ideas emotionally foreign to 228 MUSIC AND HYMNODY such sentiments, there is usually not a complete correspondence between words and music. Conjunct melody, on the other hand, follows to a greater degree the scale line, makes less frequent use of wide intervals, and uses passing notes more freely. Emotionally, it is better adapted to pur- poses in contrast to those of disjunct melody. They who delight in the musical depiction of material objects or episodes may without too great an exercise of the imagination find some examples of the onomatopceia of music among our hymn tunes. Just as in poetry there are sometimes used onomatopoetic words, which upon being pronounced imitate the sound described by the word, as “hiss,” “buzz,” “crackle’’ (of a fire), ete., so there is some- times an onomatopeeia of music, that imitates or describes the words to which it is sung. How appro- priate may he this device to the true purpose of _ music is a question akin to the problem of programme music. Its ardent defenders are quick to cite Bee- thoven’s imitation of the lowing of a cow in one of his symphonies, One critic, after playing Parry’s great tune to “In age and feebleness extreme” (746), exclaimed, “You can see the old man halting on his staff.” The harmony of the first four measures of “Thou hidden Source of calm repose” (466) describes well the thought of the first line of the hymn. There is a suggestion of hiding in the harmony of the first four chords, as they fold over from the tonic to the un- resolved chord on B flat; but the quick return to DESCRIPTIVE MUSIC; 229 the tonic triad on F seals the impression of repose, because this is the one chord denoting rest, to which every restless chord must resolve. On the opposite page of the Hymnal, “Cast thy burden on the Lord” (468) is another example of the same effect of re- pose, wrought out in the first member of the first phrase. In the next hymn (469) some musicians may refuse to see’ waving woods and rolling oceans in the waving and rolling of the melody, or to admit that in hymn 112 (first tune) the next to the last measure imitates in the alto and tenor the rocking of a cradle, where the word “cradle” occurs in that line in three out of the four verses; but, nevertheless, the suggestion is there whether wittingly or not. In “Saviour, again to thy dear name” (38) a con- trast is made in the music between the thought of “We stand to bless thee” and “Then, lowly kneeling, wait thy word of peace.” This last line of the first verse is echoed in the music, as the effect of waiting or expectancy is produced by ending the melody with four notes on the fifth (which ending is very rare). To the words “Not only when ascends the song, And soundeth sweet the word” (520) is sung a mel- ody that begins on F, and steadily ascends through- out the first half of the tune to E, so that while the congregation is singing of the song that ascends, their own voices are actually ascending the scale. One needs to observe only the name of the tune, which is “Ascending Song,” to be convinced that this device was intentional. Let us not dwell too long, however, upon the 230 MUSIC AND HYMNODY many possible examples of this ‘“‘onomatopceia of music”; for these are elements that appeal to sensa- tion rather than real musical emotion, and may be regarded merely as the curiosities of psalmody, or, when they are not purely accidental, as the tricks of musical composition. The real importance in musical description is that composers and editors preserve the emotional cor- respondence between words and music and apply the great principles governing this relation. There should be no caprice in the use of conjunct and disjunct melody, in the selection of modes, rhythm, or tonal relations, or in the choice of harmonies with which the melody is clothed. Melody should aim not at external effect, but should seek to reach the inmost emotion of the soul. From this it will be seen that in the work of joining music and words there is vastly more required of musical editorship than merely the ability to dis- cover music of the same meter as the words, and to make this the basis of the union, else editorship is not worthy of the name. Many hymnals, however, have disregarded the most common laws of metrical accent in uniting words and music. To avoid these infelicities the Hymnal Commission has set some hymns to different music. Professor Stuart, in an article on the Hymnal, says that one of the reasons for adding the tune ‘Sawley” for the words ‘Jesus, the very thought of thee” was that in singing the words to the former tune, “Holy Cross,” it was necessary to accent the second syllable of the name DESCRIPTIVE MUSIC: 231 “Jesus” in the first and the last verses. The new tune corrects this, while the old tune remains in the Hymnal as optional. There are still ‘instances in which the tune is ill-suited to the accents in the poetry, sometimes unavoidably owing to the irregu- lar accent of the poetry. For example, “Shawmut” (265) throughout the tune accents the first syllable of each line, to which it is sung. But in reading the hymn one would hardly accent “with” and “a,” as the melody now compels us to do three times to each word. Some critics of the new Hymnal have expressed surprise that a new tune. besides the old ‘An- tioch” should be added to the words, “Joy to the world.” But they would wonder less if they would sing the ‘‘wonder”’ of the last line of the hymn to the old tune with this ludicrous effect: “And won—and wonders of his love.” The new tune metrically fits the words, as the old tune does not. The new tune to the words, ‘Just as I am, without one plea,” also fits the words, as the old does not, and besides possesses a dignity and real musical merit, which was conspicuously lacking in “Woodworth.” The sacred name “Jesus” occurs as the first word in sixty-seven different verses in the Hymnal; but in nineteen of these the music makes it necessary to accent the second sylla- ble, as well as in nine other places, where the name is sung. In one hymn (222) this occurs three times. Likewise ‘Father’ is accented on the ultimate too 232 MUSIC AND HYMNODY many times. Sometimes the sense suffers from this mispronunciation, as in singing ‘‘Welcome, delightful morn,” to the tune Lischer (67) one must exclaim, “Well, come!” as though the wished-for day had not yet arrived, and were still in the future tense of that other hymn, ‘Well, the delightful day will come” (540). It is curious that the Preface of the 1878 Hymnal, and also of the present Hymnal, both refer to the union of words and music as a “marriage,” and still more curious that both Prefaces speak also of the “divorce” of words and music. Some hymnal mar- riages truly seem to have been made in heaven. We cannot speak thus of all of our Methodist hymns, though many of them seem to have been inspired in the union of words and music. But of ‘the Hymnal as a whole, and of the appropriate joining of melodies and poems, we may truly say that it is in violent contrast to the work of the haphazard matrimonial agencies that carelessly assemble certain communi- ties of tunes and verses and boldly call them hymn books. CHAPTER XI THE FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC Tae Keys—VocaL Rance—Unir Forms—REPETITION AND Imrration—HarmMony THE Methodist Hymnal affords the student of music an opportunity to observe practically all of the simple elements of melody, harmony, and form; and a critical analysis of the hymn tune, the smallest complete musical form, can be made very profitable as an elementary study. In reading a piece of music the first thing to be observed is the signature, or the number of sharps and flats immediately following the clef sign, de- noting the particular key in which the music is written. Although thirteen different keys are avail- able in music, each one of our hymn tunes begins in one of ten keys, no more than four sharps or five flats being used as a signature; and each of our tunes ends in the same key in which it began, except a few tunes beginning in the minor mode, that end in the major. The following table shows the number of tunes written in each key in the two great Methodist col- lections on both sides of the Atlantic: Mertuopist Hymnat (AMERICA) G Ee F Ab Bb C D A E Db 187 128 98 85 72 67 61 55 31 30 233 234 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Mernopist Hymn Book (Great Britain) Eb G@ F D E A C Bb Ab Db 213 156 1384 121 94 84 88 71 69 9 From this it will be observed that the most popu- lar keys in both collections, G, Eb, and F, are those of which the tonic and dominant lie within the range of the usual speaking voice. Among the remaining keys, the Americans seem to have a decided prefer- ence for flats. Investigations in the field of musical esthetics have led to the acceptance of the law that the sev- eral keys are respectively adapted to express certain emotions peculiar to their own nature. Emil Pauer declares that “the key in music is what color is in painting,” a fact recognized by Plato and Aristotle. Thus, he finds that the key of C major best expresses innocence, resolve, manly, earnest, and deep reli- gious feeling; F major reflects peace, joy, religious sentiment, or passing regret; G major reveals sincere faith, quiet love, calm meditation, simple grace, or brightness; D major proclaims majesty, grandeur, pomp; A major voices’ confidence, loving hope, simple cheerfulness; E major tells of joy, magnificence, splendor; Ab major is full of sentiment, dreamy expression; Eb major gives great variety from solemnity and courage to brilliance and dignity; B>b major is the key of open frankness, clear brightness, quiet contemplation. For this theory in esthetics psychology has never given a satisfactory reason. Certain experiments tend to disprove that this difference in the tone-color of the FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC 235 keys is produced by absolute pitch, while, on the other hand, the tempered scale should leave no differences between scales, save that of pitch. But the fact remains that in the various keys a difference of emotional adaptability exists, and is recognized by nearly all true musicians. The best composers ob- serve this principle in their work. Our hymn tunes illustrate in many instances a psychological nicety in the choice of keys. Some composers, however, have utterly disre- garded the fitness of the keys to the emotional intent of their hymns, while some tunes, as they have run the gantlet of successive editors, have been frequently changed from their original keys. Every melody must be brought within the range of the average soprano; for when it soars too high it is unfitted for congregational singing. Frequently this change from the composer’s original key mars the tone-color of the tune. Several tunes in the old Hymnals, North and South, have been changed as to their key in the new Hym- nal. Some tunes appear in the new Hymnal in two different keys, as, for instance, ‘Regent Square,” sung to hymns 113 and 169 in the key of C, which is emotionally preferable, and to hymns 25 and 662 in the key of Bb, which is more comfortable for timid sopranos. Between the Methodist Hymnal and the Meth- odist Hymn Book of England there is a difference in the choice of key for the same tune in about forty instances. In four fifths of these differences the 236 MUSIC AND HYMNODY English book has chosen the higher key, as in the case of Carey’s “National Hymn” (our “America’’), to which the Englishman chants his patriotism a full major third higher than the American, singing in the key of A instead of our F. Thus in the matter of keys, as in other elements of hymnology, the Wesleyan Church has followed, more closely than we, the advice of John Wesley, who urged that Methodist hymns be sung in a high key in order to reach the full vigor of expression. As we have noted, however, the range of melody should not exceed the average compass of the ordinary soprano in the congregation. The octave from E to E in the treble clef is the limit of com- fortable singing for the usual congregation; and melodies that keep well within this limit have at least the benefit of simple range to help them attain popularity. ‘The Star-Spangled Banner” might, in- deed, be our national song, were it not for its un- comfortable range of an octave plus a fifth. Our tune “Ewing’’ for “Jerusalem the golden,” with an octave plus a third, leaves many a singer stranded high and dry before the sixth line. is sung, while the greatly inferior tune “Martyn” to “Jesus, Lover of my soul” can be easily sung by a small child. The compass of the three lower voices need not affect the choice of key; but, by skill in harmonizing, these parts should be confined to certain average limits, the alto within the octave from A to A, the tenor within E and E, and the bass within G and C. FORMAE ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC 237 Trained choirs can comfortably exceed these limits, but not congregations. The Hymnal may be used as a profitable text- book in the study of the smaller forms of music. The form of nearly all of our hymn tunes is known as the period form. In its simplicity, a period con- sists of two phrases of four measures each, or eight measures in all. While the musical phrase in its regular form consists of four measures, it may be extended to five, six, or seven measures, or con- tracted to three, or in certain meters to two, the end of the phrase being denoted by a cadence (the resolution of the harmony into a common chord on the keynote). Of these many phrase-forms cae are abundant examples among our hymn tunes, and to determine to a nicety the nature of each phrase is a mental exercise profitable and interesting to the student who has mastered the principles of phrase-formation.’ The phrase, however, is not a complete musical form. The period, or one-part form, is the unit of complete form in music. When regular it consists of two phrases, such as we have déscribed. Nearly all of our hymn tunes are in the period form, and, owing to the variations in its two component parts, the period form assumes a variety of lengths and shapes in our psalmody. There are some examples of two-part forms, especially among the English hymn tunes. Among these may be classed most of 1Gf. “The Homophonic Forms of Musical Composition,” Percy Goetschius. 238 MUSIC AND HYMNODY the tunes with refrain, the second part being the refrain. A very few of the tunes are in three-part form, the third part being a repetition of the first part, as “The Good Fight” (418). These three compass all the forms exemplified regularly in our Hymnal. Some of the tunes seem to bear evidence of the composer’s lack of familiarity with the laws of form, Still others are difficult to analyze, as “Hin’ Feste Burg.” As an esthetic principle, repetition is regarded as pleasing in art. This is especially evident in music and architecture, although poetry and painting and the other arts also frequently illustrate this prin- ciple. Many of our hymn melodies make effective and pleasing use of repetition. Only a few of the tunes repeat exactly both melody and harmony of the first. phrase, as ‘Ein’ Feste Burg” (101), “Holy Spirit, faithful Guide” (193), and “Maidstone” (469), the last example repeating not only the first eight measures, but also the second four at the end. Repe- tition to be most effective must be not exact, but should be combined with variation. In larger forms of music this variation is wrought out in rhythm, in form, in orchestration, and a thousand possible embellishments; in the simple hymn tune by (1) dif- ference at the end of the repeated phrase, or (2) in the harmony; or by imitation of the melody, (3) in contrary motion, or (4) in the sequence. (1) In the hymns Nos. 8, 36, 60, 127, 194, 195, 615, and 689 may be found a repetition in the mel- ody of most of the phrase, but a difference at the FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC 239 end of the repeated phrase, and often in the few notes preceding and preparing the cadence. Some- times in a repeated melody the variation extends farther back than this, as in Nos. 27, 53, 66, 78, 431, 621, 640, 675. (2) A repetition in the melody with a change in the harmony is becoming more and more the custom to-day, especially in the English tunes. Many com- posers of the older school would have made no har- monic change in repeating the melody; and even in the contemporary tunes this has been consistently avoided by some composers, as, for example, Richard Redhead. Nevertheless, it adds to the richness of the music, and is xsthetically good usage. In illus- tration of this, note the beautiful effect which the composer has produced by clothing the melody of a phrase in different harmony, when repeated in the fol- lowing hymns: Nos. 30, 84 (second half), 97, and also where only a part of the phrase is repeated, as in Nos. 15, 77, 109, 199, 324, 406, 463 (first), 545 ’ (first). (3) Imitation is sometimes made by inverting the melody. While there are no examples in the Hymnal of a whole phrase being repeated in contrary motion, parts of the melody are often repeated in inverted form. The “Italian Hymn” (2) is planned through- out upon this principle. The thirteenth measure is ‘but an imitation of the first and seventh upside down; the tenth and twelfth a repetition of the fourth; the fifteenth a repetition of the ninth and the eleventh, to each of which measures, together with the first 240 MUSIC AND HYMNODY note of the following measure, the second and third are similarly related. Thus, ten out of the twelve active measures of this melody are involved in the principle of repetition. (4) The most interesting form of imitative repe- tition is that of sequence (literally ‘“following’’), wherein the melody is repeated not upon the same notes as before, but upon other notes that lie one or more tones higher or lower than the original phrase or figure. In many hymns the melody of the very first figure is repeated in sequence, as in Nos. 161, 522, 566, 591, 603, 704. In others, not only the first figure, but also other figures, are thus repeated: Nos. 10, 62, 118, 298, 574, 578, 709. In still others the figure to be repeated in sequence begins the second half of the tune: Nos. 48, 130, 382, 387, 456, 518, 525. Sometimes the figure is so small as to lie within the compass of one measure, and is repeated in sequence several times in other measures: Nos. 63 (measures 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and also in the tenor part), 157, 192 (measures 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11), 224 (measures 8, 9, 10, 11), 362 (meas- ures 7, 8, 9), 452 (measures 9, 10, 11), 515 (measures 9, 10, 11). The tune “America” (702) illustrates both se- quence and inverted imitations. Hymn tunes Nos. 57, 68, 640, and many others, illustrate both repetition and sequence. In fact, such frequent use is made of repetitions in various forms that there is scarcely a tune in the Hymnal that does not employ them to 1(The number of the measures is computed from the beginning of the first full meaaure.) FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC 241 bind the unity of the melody, and to satisfy the zsthetic demand for repetition in art. The harmony of the hymn tunes is richer and more varied than in previous Methodist collections, and the enrichment proceeds chiefly from the Eng- lish contributions to our psalmody. It may be said also that the harmony of the new book is more logical and, for the most part, more correct. Such banalities in harmony as consecutive perfect fifths or octaves, augmented seconds, ascending sevenths or descending thirds in the chord of the dominant seventh, misspelling of chords—these demand edi- torial alertness to recognize and correct. Some- times a composer is justified in making an ex- ception to some rule of harmony, where there is good reason. Barnby, anxious to establish some ascending or descending line of melody in one of the three lower parts, or to follow some sequence, will often resolve a dominant seventh in unusual fashion. The first measures of ‘Love Divine” (355) and “Dunstan” (272) make beautiful use of the otherwise forbidden consecutive octaves between tenor and soprano. A few of the transgressions of these simple laws of harmony in the Hymnal seem not to be justifiable. We may not dwell upon the meaning and use of each chord; but let us note one or two niceties of harmonic treatment that will serve to illustrate the . importance of the harmony and its best usage. The chord of the dominant seventh has become of in- creasing importance in church music, since it was 242 .MUSIC AND HYMNODY first thoroughly established in the works of Monte- verde, in 1568.’ It is the chord of longing, of aspira- tion, and demands speedy resolution to the common chord of satisfaction. It is less frequent in the slow, dignified music of the Reformation than in modern hymn tunes, wherein resolutions are made more rapidly. When it is consistently avoided, however, an effect of stately simplicity is heightened, just as in Salisbury Cathedral, built throughout in the early English style of architecture, the noblest beauty is produced by strong, simple lines unembellished by elaborations of the perpendicular style. “Marlow” (8), ‘‘Winchester Old” (181), and “St. Anne” (214) contain no dominant sevenths, while ‘Dundee’ (96) and “Old Hundred” (16) contain only one each, and these were not originally so written. ‘Ewing” (612), “Cobern” (92),.and “Gilead” (202) have in- tentionally avoided the dominant seventh in several places. Most of our tunes, however, abound in the use of this rich chord, and, as was discussed in the preceding chapter, to the emotional enrichment of the music. In none of the ““Amens” in the body of the Hymnal is the dominant seventh used. This is true because, curiously enough, not one “‘Amen”’ is written to an authentic cadence; for the plagal cadence is used in each of the 557 different tunes. While of the two forms the plagal cadence is by far the more common in the “Amens” of other hymnals, it is ae “The Evolution of Church Music,” by the Rev. F. J. Humphreys, FORMAL ELEMENTS OF THE MUSIC 243 very rarely that a book entirely omits the authentic cadence. All of the “Amens,” with only fourteen excep- tions, end on the same note as the last note of the tune. And each ends on the same chord as the last chord of the tune, except where the tune ends in the minor mode, in which our editors have every time added a major cadence for the “Amen.” The harmonies in our Hymnal are more close than one sometimes finds in the English Methodist Hymn Book. The tenor and bass rarely part company farther than an octave, nor the soprano and bass many notes over two octaves. There is still pre- served, however, a freedom of motion in all four parts. As a rule, the bass should move in opposite direction from the soprano, whenever possible and consistent with good harmony. A bass that runs along on one note robs the harmony many times of the interest it should have. In the best writing the bass part has a melody of its own to sing. Owing to the peculiar intervals into which the bass is often foreed, the bass part could hardly be adapted for the chief melody of a hymn tune, but not so the ~ tenor part. The student of harmony would find it a profitable exercise to select the tenor parts of the following hymns for the melody of a new hymn tune: “Cross of Jesus” (98), ‘“Bremen’’ (476), “Hin’ Feste Burg” (101), “Nuremberg” (103), “St. Atha- nasius” (77), “Munich” (151); and in harmonizing this tenor melody they can be made to produce a beautiful new hymn tune. Such a harmonization of 244. ‘MUSIC AND HYMNODY the tenor part of “Cross of Jesus” yields the follow- ing typical hymn tune: =s PART IV PRACTICAL USES OF THE HYMNAL 245 CHAPTER XII HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL PREPARATION—FuNCcTION oF Hymns—Omittinc VERsEsS— Tue CxHorr—GospeL Hymns—Hymn Stupy Ciasses—PRAcTICAL Puans OUTLINED THE most essential condition for-success in the intelligent use of the Hymnal in worship is prepara- ition. Formal worship cannot reach its highest effec- tiveness when a pastor habitually neglects to prepare his hymns. And the first step toward preparation - should be a thorough general familiarity with the Hymnal. It is a Methodistic axiom that every pas- tor should know. his Bible, his Hymnal, and his Discipline; and yet it is often taken for granted that the hasty search for six hymns on Saturday night is sufficient for a knowledge of the Hymnal. In more than one theological school it is urged that the students form the habit of spending at least one solid hour each week in the study of hymns and tunes, a habit to be profitably continued during active pastoral days. Only by earnest study can be gained a practical familiarity with the hymns, their theology, their meaning, their music, and their relative effectiveness in varied forms of worship. Later paragraphs in this chapter suggest some methods of study for the individual student, as well as for class study. This educational preparation once thoroughly ac- 247 248 MUSIC AND HYMNODY complished, the choosing of hymns for particular services becomes something of the art which it deserves to be. In the more highly liturgical churches supreme attention is applied, as a rule, to the con- gregational hymns, the anthems, and the chants, and their appropriateness to the central thought of the occasion. This is made the more imperative because of the rigid regulatity of the Church calendar of the Christian Year. But even where there is greater freedom in the forms of worship, as in Methodism, worshipers have a right to expect that the guidance of their spiritual thought through- out the service has been prepared beforehand with great care, and especially in the matter of hymn- singing. A spiritual unity can be produced throughout a service of worship by a careful and prayerful choice of hymns, each fitting the occasion and performing some definite function in the office of worship and instruction. Where there is carelessness or rude spontaneity in the choice of hymns, the fatal fitness of the hymn to the situation is sometimes painfully ludicrous. At Ossining, New York, during one meeting when the church was very cold, and it was deemed wise to shorten the service to protect the shivering congre- gation, some one inadvertently started this hymn, My all is on the altar, I’m waiting for the fire. A prominent member of the New Jersey Conference, HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 249 upon his return from his honeymoon, gave out from his pulpit the hymn containing the verse. O that I could forever sit With Mary at the Master’s feet! Be this my happy choice, . . . To hear the Bridegroom’s voice. His wife’s name was Mary; and, of course, had he read the hymn through before choosing it, he would have spared himself the jests of his friends for years. Many such instances could be multiplied, were it not so unwise to load our hymns with these humorous associations, In contrast to all this, however, the very psy- chological principle of association that sometimes awakens the sense of humor can be and should be employed to intensify the spiritual thought and feeling of every service. This does not mean that each hymn should be an epitome of the sermon or its central ideas (though at least one such hymn is often very effective), but, rather, that a unity of purpose and feeling should be sustained throughout the service, and that each hymn should be chosen to reenforce the dominant theme. Each hymn in the order of worship has a different psychological duty to perform. The function of the first hymn is clearly to create a spiritual atmosphere of reverence and a sense of Christian unity. Were each worshiper prepared for the service of the sanc- tuary by private devotions at home, the spirit of reverence would be more intense at the very begin- ning of the service. But this is rarely the case. The 250 MUSIC AND HYMNODY congregation usually assemble from their homes, where, perhaps, the last thoughts were of more care- ful dress, or the Sunday dinner, or some other household care. In passing through the streets a hundred worldly thoughts throng upon the mind, each insisting upon being borne into the place of worship. In fact, the writer has actually seen in the church in Concord, Massachusetts, where Emerson used to preach, men and women bearing their Sun- day newspapers and mail into the sanctuary, there to peruse them during the forepart of the service. The first opening hymn should be an antidote to the irrelevant, irreverent, worldly atmosphere that often enshrouds the spirit of the churchgoer. Worship should usually be the theme of this hymn. Further- more, the social sense of Christian fellowship and. unity in worship should be awakened by the first hymn. Such hymns as “All people that on earth do dwell” (16), “Come, ye that love the Lord’ (22), “Now thank we all our God” (30), and “Ye servants of God, your Master proclaim” (11) tend to express and arouse this idea. The second hymn should usually be in the ratte of a preparation for the thought of the sermon. It should be intense rather than exciting, quiet rather than animating. In a peculiar sense it tills the ground, preparing it for the seed of the Word. If ministers could realize how greatly the attention of the congregation varies on successive Sabbaths as a result of the second hymn, it would be regarded as an integral part of the sermon itself. HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 251 However important may be the two preceding hymns, the great opportunity of the hour of worship is the closing hymn. By an appropriate hymn at the close the message of the preacher can often be burned deep into the hearts and memories of the people; by an inappropriate hymn some of the elements of the message may be dissipated or con- fused. The closing hymn crowns and completes that which has been uttered before, and therefore makes it a more permanent impression. This can sometimes be strengthened by ‘a reference to the closing hymn, or a quotation of some word or phrase from the hymn toward the end of the sermon. While such a device can be overworked, when judiciously employed it can be made very effective. These general principles for the selection of hymns may apply to both morning and evening hymns. A difference in general character between morning and evening hymns will be more marked in those churches which observe a greater difference in the nature of the two services. The morning service is generally recognized as better adapted to more profound thought both in sermon and hymn. The Sunday evening service is a problem in most churches, and it is being met by making the worship attractive in a hundred different legitimate ways. The vesper hour is sympathetic to the tender emotions, and songs of heaven and our gentle hymns of rest in the Lord often make more beautiful the evensong of worship. Hymn services, such as are suggested in the end of this book, are often used to make the 252 MUSIC AND HYMNODY programme of devotions more attractive, and, under wise and devout leadership, more helpful to many. Not only the choice of hymns but also the choice of verses in any given hymn is important. One must needs exercise caution in omitting verses from hymns to be sung. Each hymn in the Hymnal was prepared for the purpose of being sung through- out. Therefore there is but one hymn in the body of our hymns with as many as nine verses, four with eight verses, and fifteen with seven verses; and most of these are short verses. In spite of this, in some churches it is the exception rather than the tule to hear a whole hymn sung through all its verses. Perhaps this word of caution might sometimes be applied to Hymnal Commissions. Our hymn (4) “The God of Abrahams praise” has been made out of three other hymns in the old Hymnal (originally one hymn, as written by Thomas Olivers). To accomplish this, verses have been omitted, but with strange effect. The last two lines of verse four runs thus: And trees of life forever grow, With mercy crowned. The following verse begins: Before the great, Three-One They all exulting stand, And tell the wonders he hath done Through all their Jand. Poor Olivers would have been horrified to see such a hiatus, making the pronoun “they” refer to “‘trees,’’ HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 253 instead of “his own,” “his saints in light,” as would be clearly seen were the omitted verses in evidence. The most deplorable instance of faulty omission in editing the Hymnal is to be found in “Glorious things of thee are spoken” (210), where the editors have repeated the first four lines at the end, instead of the four lines that Newton wrote, rounding out the real meaning of the hymn so beautifully: He who gives us daily manna, He who listens to our cry, Let him raise the glad hosanna Rising to this throne on high. Greater pitfalls, however, are dug by the careless omission of verses printed in the Hymnal. Leaders of prayer meetings, and often of formal church serv- ices, are apt to announce a hymn, and as if there were danger of monotony in singing too much of the same hymn they add: “We'll sing the first, second, and last stanzas,’ or some such glib formula for skipping, regardless of the sense or nonsense thereby produced. If the reader will sing “the first and last verses” of such hymns as Nos. 137, 143, 165, or several others with gaps in the logic, he will appreciate some of the thoughtless effect produced by omitting essential verses. The third verse of hymn 79 is this: But when we view thy strange design To save rebéllious worms, Where vengeance and compassion join In their divinest forms; And yet a “first-three-verses” leader is likely to leave his congregation impending in midair upon 254 MUSIC AND HYMNODY this uncompleted thought, unless he reads over the hymn, and discovers that. the third verse is impos- sible without the fourth. A similar catastrophe would occur if hymn 115 were ended with the fifth verse, or 257 with the third. A. pastor once gave out the first and last verses of “In the cross of Christ I glory,” and upon singing it was amazed to find the last verse exactly like the first, much to the congregation’s amusement. In order to develop the thoughts of the awfulness, the tenderness, and the worshipfulness of God, all so essential to the success of H. Kirke White’s hymn, “The Lord our God is clothed with might,’ what verse of the hymn could be omitted? or what verse would you omit from 113 without slighting angels, shepherds, sages, saints, or sinners? Not long ago at a missionary meeting we heard “From Green- land’s icy mountains” ended with the second verse: In vain with lavish kindness The gifts of God are strown; The heathen in his blindness Bows down to wood and stone. To those who were closely following the thought of the hymn the effect was most depressing. It was like ending a joyful symphony with a dirge move- ment. Hymn 183 yields the same pessimistic effect without the prayer of the last verse. The fourth verse of “A mighty fortress” cannot follow any other verse but the third, because “That word,” beginning the fourth verse, refers to “One little word” of the third verse. Thus in the practical use HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 255 of the Hymnal if a verse or two must be omitted, it should always be done with care. How much better it is to sing all the verses! It is wise for the minister to confer occasionally with the choirmaster or organist in the choice of hymns, especially if the former be not a musician; for in many churches and by many pastors our richest musical gems are entirely overlooked, be- cause they are new or unfamiliar. After the hymns are selected many pastors find it profitable to meet with the choir in rehearsing the hymns, where the delicacy of that overdelicate organization permits of his presence (and the value of a choir that resents diplomatic direction by the pastor is highly questionable). The ultimate object of frequent conference be- tween pastor, choirmaster, and choir should be to raise constantly the spiritual efficiency of the hymn- singing and other music of worship. This process should aim to elevate the taste of the congregation and to familiarize them with a wealth of good hymns and tunes now unknown to them. This can be done, not all at once, but gradually, like most other edu- cational methods that are worth while. Learning new tunes can be made very interesting or very dull. One must be temperate in this, but constantly progressive. In the matter of new tunes some churches actually display laziness; others, in their zeal for novelty, rarely repose in the restful strains of the good, old tunes. A happy medium between the two produces the best results. A new tune 256 MUSIC AND HYMNODY should be chosen with care, and, once learned, should be frequently repeated at different services until fixed and familiar. It is the new tunes, and not the new hymns, that pastors fear to choose; and many a good hymn is not available because the pastor is afraid to learn the tune. The musical ignorance of some congregations to-day is as great as the literary ignorance of some of Wesley’s con- gregations, to whom the hymns must needs be “lined out” in the ancient fashion. But that did not deter Wesley from giving his congregations spiritual truth in noble poetic form. And as for the tunes he used, some of them were much more diffi- cult than any that may be found in the present Methodist Hymnal. None of our hymn tunes are too difficult for the average congregation to learn with the proper leadership and a little patience and persistence. One problem every minister is obliged to face, and that is the use of the gospel hymns. In some churches there is a constant temptation to use them almost exclusively, “because everyone knows them.’ Gos- pel hymns are often effective in bringing men to their senses, in driving home conviction, in pointing the way to the cross; and many a man can testify from his own experience to the helpfulness of the gospel hymn. But for men who are growing in mind and soul under the developing influence of Christian experience they yield only a weak spiritual pabulum. Their nourishing, enriching power is too meager and unsatisfying for a steady diet. HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 257 Furthermore, the constant use of hymns weak in thought and expression tends to thoughtless singing, or the bad habit too prevalent among congregations of singing one thing while thinking of something else. The presence of a few select gospel hymns in the Hymnal may argue the adaptability of the book to prayer meeting services and Sunday schools, but does not indicate that these songs are best fitted for the Sabbath services of the sanctuary. That the Hymnal is suitable for Sunday schools and prayer meetings has been demonstrated in several churches where it is so used both in the city and the country districts. Some churches regularly devote a part of every midweek service to the sing- ing of new hymns, often prefaced by explanatory remarks by the leader of the meeting. This widens the hymnological range of the congregation, at the same time adding a novel interest to the meeting. The chief argument for the use of the Hymnal in the Sunday school is that it teaches the children to memorize the truly great hymns of the Church. This better prepares them for the higher services of the Church, and—what is of inestimable value—fixes . in their memories the doctrinal teachings and essen- tial truths of our religion, so that in most cases they cannot be forgotten. How many Christian men and women have been helped in sorrow, strengthened in times of doubt, or led to repentance and faith through remembering the lines of some hymn learned in the Sunday school! Contrast with this the prevailing custom of using through every Sunday of the year 258 MUSIC AND HYMNODY a group of weak, sentimental songs to be discarded as soon as the binding of the books wears out! Then one can understand the criticism of Dr. J. Williams Butcher,’ Secretary of the British Wesleyan Sunday School Union, when he observed that one of the two striking weaknesses of the American Sabbath school lies in its weak hymns and poor tunes, One time-honored custom among Methodists is falling into disuse—the reading of the hymn before singing. Even though it may have had its origin in the ancient method of “lining out” the hymn to congregations that had no hymnals, nevertheless it has had the effect of concentrating the thought of the singers upon the meaning of the words. Indeed, there are well-authenticated instances on record of conversions as a direct result of the eloquent reading of a hymn by a pastor before singing. The art of, making this a helpful spiritual exercise is being neglected. And this may be partly due to our sense of hurry, the lack of time, the necessity of making the service comfortably brief. But in omitting this we are neglecting one of the most practical spiritual uses of the Hymnal. On this subject the biography of Calvin Sears Harrington, D.D., by his wife, con- tains the observation: ‘He wondered and grieved at the modern fashion of merely naming the hymn for the Sabbath service; he thought so much effect was produced by the careful reading of those words of 1Cf. Article “The Sunday School in America and Great Britain: A Contrast and an Impression,” by the Rev. J. Williams Butcher, in the Sunday School Journal, New York, March, 1909. HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 259 doctrine, of worship, of praise, of holy devotion. It was to him a means of grace that he wished all to enjoy.” Many of the richest resources of the Methodist Hymnal are left untouched by the pastor who confines his use of the book to the six hymns in the formal services of the Sabbath. The human mind takes pleasure in classifications; and by employing groups of hymns bearing upon some given subject or related to each other in origin or form, a hun- dred bright, interesting, helpful services can be arranged for Sunday evenings or prayer meetings, that would familiarize the congregation with our hymnology and. accustom them to singing hymns with greater attention to their meaning. A few of the many possible services with the Hymnal we suggest in subsequent pages in the hope that they - --may lead pastors and people to a freer use of the .» Hymnal. A Hymn-Quotine SERVICE Some of the most successful midweek prayer meetings have taken as their theme, “My Favorite Hymn, and Why.” Using the Methodist Hymnal in prayer meeting would be an innovation in some churches, but it is worth while for a service of this kind. After singing several of the old, old favorites, and after a season of prayer, the pastor may speak of the power of hymns over the souls of men to draw them nearer to the Saviour. Then, after more singing, the meeting can be profitably thrown open 260 MUSIC AND HYMNODY for any to speak upon the question proposed. Usually this is such a popular subject that the speakers must be limited to short testimonies. For hymns to be used in a service of this kind it is well to choose only the old favorites. William T. Stead, in his “Hymns that Have Helped,” tells of a popular vote conducted by one of the religious journals of Eng- land, The Sunday at Home, on the hundred English hymns that are most esteemed. Those receiving the highest number of votes were: 1. Rock of Ages (3,215 votes). 2. Abide with me. 3. Jesus, Lover of my soul. 4. Just as I am (these three receiving about 3,000 votes each). The next highest were: 5. How sweet the name of Jesus sounds! 6. My. God, my Father, while I stray. 7. Nearer, my God, tothee. 8. Sunofmysoul. 9. I heard the voice of Jesus say. 10. Art thou weary, art thou languid? Sometimes after a ringing testimony concerning some well-known hymn, it is well to start the singing of the hymn (with or without the instrument). A Hymn-Memory Contest In Sunday schools, or Epworth Leagues, or some- times even in the church at large, it is helpful as a stimulus to memorizing the hymns to hold a hymn-memory contest. It should be announced at least a month before; better still, three months before if the interest can be sustained. A list of fifty hymns should be published on a bulletin, or printed slips of paper, from which as many hymns are to be learned as possible. When the contest HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 261 * is held judges may be appointed. Each hymn perfectly recited should count one hundred points, and for each word misquoted or omitted in the recital of a hymn five points should be deducted from the one hundred possible points for that hymn. No hymn in which more than five words are omitted or misquoted should be counted at all. Thus seventy- five points is the lowest count permissible for any one hymn. The total number of points of each contestant should be added, and the one having the highest score wins the contest. Bishop Warren’s little book, “Fifty-two. Memory Hymns,” would be an aid to each contestant and judge; and as only two of his memory hymns are not in the Methodist Hymnal, namely “O the hour when this material” and “There is an eye that never sleeps,” his book contains exactly fifty hymns from the Methodist Hymnal. This should make the ideal list of fifty in a memory contest. Their num- bers in the Methodist Hymnal are as follows: 198, 396, 407, 23, 415, 66, 646, 109, 637, 461, 137, 236, 446, 682, 186, 612, 375, 537, 533, 148, 107, 159, 373, 702, 535, 518, 449, 540, 68, 363, 350, 153, 188, 214, 189, 502, 385, 139, 348, 207, 233, 136, 99, 416, 98, 92, 636, 128, 141, 392. Sermon Series ILLUSTRATED witH Hymns An almost unlimited number of sermon-series could be devised, illustrating doctrines as taught by the hymns, or using hymns as illustrations of the subject-matter. 262 MUSIC AND HYMNODY Crist IN Sone Rev. J. Lyon Caughey once successfully used a series of sermons on ‘The Characteristics of Christ Expressed in Song.” On five successive Sunday nights his themes were: (1) The Best Friend, (2) The Living Lord, (3) The Perfect Saviour, (4) The Light of Life, (5) The Hope of the World. Each theme was elaborately illustrated by the singing of hymns-from the Hymnal. CuurcH History An interesting series of sermons might be preached on “Church History,” illustrating it by hymns from different theological periods. 1. The Pre-Reformation Church. Greek Hymns: 616, 672. Latin Hymns: 166, 533, 612, 614, 599, 125, 483. 2. The Reformation. Hymns by Luther: 641 and 101. Later German Chorales (which are Lutheran in form and spirit, if not in date): 30, 476, 151, 93. 83. The Moravians and their Influence on Methodism. Count Zinzendorf and others: 148, 359, 221, 225, 435, 278, 252, 333, 345, 305. 4. The Wesleyan Revival. Charles Wesley: 463, 1, 466, 111, 511, 181, 262, 256, 355, 310, 301. , 5. Modern Evangelism. 272, 284, 329, 325, 334, 544, 548, 551, 383. EvENINGS WITH THE GREAT GERMAN COMPOSERS Upon these occasions the choir and organist may render males selections, vocal and instrumental, from the composer under discussion. 1. Ludwig von Beethoven (1770-1827). Use Hymns: 160, 518, 423, 204, 131, 88 (second tune), 40 (in the order named). 2. Francis Joseph Haydn (1732-1809). Johann C. W. Adameus Mozart (1756-91). Haydn’s tunes: 106, 105, 84, 210. Mozart’s tunes: 80, 458, 378. 3. Felix J. L. Mendelssohn-Bartholdy (1809-47). Use Hymns: 43, 116, 379, 151, 273, 111. 4, Georg Frederic Handel (1685-1759). Use Hymns; 298, 182, 586, 115, 370, 107 (second tune). HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 263 5. Carl Maria von Weber (1786-1826). 1 Robert Alexre Schumann (1810-56). Weber’s tunes: 524, 267, 545 (second tune). Schumann’s melodies: 127, 435. Evenines wits tHE ENnGuiso Hymnists 1, Charles Wesley. Hymns: 1 (his conversion), 643 (his preaching), 463, 511, 181, 262, 355, 746 (his death— see pages 69 and 228). . John Newton. Hymns: 69, 92, 137, 210, 309, 507, 538, 574. . James Montgomery. Hymns: 97, 113, 188, 397, 431, 448 (second tune), 497, 646. 2. John Wesley. Hymns: 45, 624—Translations, 148, 221, 225, 305, 333, 345. 3. Isaac Watts. Hymns: 5, 71, 107, 141, 146, 393, 577, 604. 4. William Cowper. Hymns: 37, 96, 198, 211, 291, 454, 492, 496. 5. Philip Doddridge. Hymns: 100, 108, 230, 233, 288, 312, 396, 429. 6 7 A Mosican PrRoGRAMME For an entertainment, Epworth League meeting, or prayer meeting, consisting of larger musical com- positions from which hymn-tunes have been taken (see pages 196, 197, 198, 199). 1. Piano Solo—Andante movement, Sonata, Opus 14, No. 2—Beethoven. Hymn 131. 2. Tenor Solo—Recitative from Oratorio ‘‘Messiah,” “Com- fort ye”—Handel. Hymn 107. 3. Piano Solo—Song without Words, Book 2, No. 3, “Consolation’—Mendelssohn. Hymn 43. 4. Contralto Solo—Oratorio ‘Messiah,’ “I know that my Redeemer liveth’”—Handel. Hymn 370. 5. Piano Solo—Song without Words, Book 3, No. 6, “Duet”—Mendelssohn. Hymn 379. 6. Tenor Solo—Oratorio “Elijah,” “If with all your hearts” —-Mendelssohn. Hymn 116. 7. Piano Solo—‘‘Last Hope’’—Gottschalk. Hymn 562. 8. Piano Solo—‘‘ Nachtstiick,’ Opus 23, No. 4— Schumann. Hymn 42. Sometimes the hymn is sung after each program number, 264 MUSIC AND HYMNODY SprectaL HyMNAL SERVICES WITH RESPONSIVE READINGS The following services may be used in the regular Sunday evening worship of the church, in the prayer meetings, Epworth League devotional meetings, etc. Indeed, many of them have already been used by the author and others in such meetings. Under each number or subdivision a passage of Scripture is given. These may be read responsively by the leader and congregation, if Bibles have been liberally distributed; or they may be read by different indi- viduals, to whom the leader has previously assigned these passages. Under each subdivision a hymn has been men- tioned that is peculiarly appropriate to the subject. Many have marveled that our Hymnal touches upon so many different themes. Some of these hymn-tunes are old, some are new. The pastor or leader should not hesitate to sing the new tunes, as these would broaden the melodie range of his congregation. At the end of each service is added some topic for general discussion which may be used effectively in a prayer meeting. The best results can be secured if the leader assigns this subject beforehand to several people, who shall come prepared to speak upon it. In the case of the Old Testament or New Testament heroes it adds to the interest to assign a different character to each speaker, according to his own selection, HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 265 1. Tae Birr or Curis? 1. Prophecy. Isa. 9. 2-7. Hymn 116, “Come, thou long-expected Jesus.” 2. The Birth-Place. Luke 2. 1-7. Hymn 121, “O little town of Bethlehem.” 3. The Night. Isa. 8. 22 and 9. 1-2. Hymn 123, “Silent night! Holy night!” 4. The Mother. Luke 1. 46-55 (The Magnificat). Hymn 112 (second tune, verses 1, 2), “There’s a song in the air!” 5. The Shepherds. Luke 2. 8-12. Hymn 115 (verses 1, 4), “While shepherds watched their flocks.” 6. The Angels. Luke 2. 13-19. Hymn 113, “Angels from the realms of glory.” 7. The Gloria. Read the Gloria in Excelsis, Hymn No. 742. Hymn 120, “Long years ago o’er Bethlehem’s hills.” 8. The Wise Men. Matt. 2. 1-11. Hymn 114 (verses 1, 3, 4), “Brightest and best of the sons.” 9. The Mission of Joy and Love. John 3. 13-21. Hymn 107, “Joy to the world! the Lord is come.” 10. The Appeal to Our Hearts. John 15. 7-16. Hymn 122, “Thou didst leave thy throne and thy kingly crown.” Topic for Discussion; “What does Christmas Mean to You?”’ ts 266 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 2. Tae Lire or Curist Opening Hymn, 138, “Christ’s life our code, his cross our creed.”’ 10. ll. 12 . His Birth. Luke 2. 8-20. Hymn 112 (second tune), ‘“There’s a song in the air!” . His Childhood. Luke 2. 40-52. Hymn 678 (5th and 6th verses), ““O Thou, whose infant feet were found.” . His Preaching. Luke 4. 15-22. Hymn 290, ‘“‘How sweetly flowed the gospel’s sound!” . His Miracles. Matt. 4. 23-25. Hymn 695, “When Jesus dwelt in mortal clay.” . His Transfiguration. Matt. 17. 1-8. Hymn 129, ‘‘The chosen three on mountain height.” . His Love for Little Children. Mark 10. 13-16. Hymn 230, ‘‘See Israel’s gentle Shepherd stand.” . Palm Sunday. Mark 11. 1-10. Hymn 150, “Ride on, ride on in majesty!” . The Last Supper. Mark 14. 12-26. Hymn 235, ‘Jesus spreads his banner o’er us.” . His Passion. Mark 14. 32-42. Hymn 147, ‘’Tis midnight; and on Olive’s brow.” The Cross. Mark 15. 22-39. Hymn 142, “Behold the Saviour of mankind.” His Resurrection. Mark 16. 1-14. Hymn 156, ‘Christ the Lord is risen to-day.” . His Ascension. Acts 1. 1-11. Hymn 161, ‘Rise, glorious Conqueror, rise.” Closing Hymn, 180, “All hail the power of Jesus’ name!” Topic for Discussion: “Is the Historic Christ a Reality to You?” HOW. TO USE THE HYMNAL 267 3. THE PaRaBLes or CHRIst Opening Hymn, 290, “How sweetly flowed the gospel’s sound!”’ 1. The Solid Rock. Matt. 7. 24-27. Hymn 330, “My hope is built.on nothing less.” 2. The Sower and His Seed. Matt. 13. 1-12. Hymn 221, “High on his everlasting throne.” 3. Who is My Neighbor? Buke 10. 25-37. Hymn 690, “Who is thy neighbor?” 4. The Feast. Luke 14. 15-24. Hymn 256, “Come, sinners, to the gospel feast.” 5. The Prodigal Son. Luke 15. 11-32. Hymn 255, “Return, O wanderer, return.” 6. Lazarus, the Poor Man. Luke 16. 19-31. Hymn 628 (3d verse), ‘While here, a stranger far from home.” 7. The Lost Sheep. Luke 15. 1-7. Hymn 300, “I was a wandering sheep.” 8. The Wise and Foolish Virgins. Matt. 25. 1-13. Hymn 429, “Ye servants of the Lord” (1st two verses). 9. The Talents. Matt. 25. 14-30. Hymn 597, “Servant of God, well done!’ (1st verse only). Closing Hymn, 127 (1st and last verses), “How beauteous were the marks divine.” Topic for Discussion: “What is Your Favorite Parable?” 268 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 4. Tue Mrracvuss or Curist 1. The Marriage Feast at Cana. John 2. 1-11. Hymn 667 (lst verse only), “Since Jesus freely did appear.” 2. Healing the Sick. Matt. 8. 14-17. Hymn 54 (Ist, 2d, and 6th verses), “At even ere the sun was set.” 3. Stilling of the Tempest. Mark 4. 35-41. Hymn 485, “Fierce raged the tempest o’er the deep.” 4. Healed by the Hem of His Garment. Mark 5. 24-34. Hymn 696 (3d and 4th verses), ‘And Christ was still the healing friend.” 5. Feeding the Multitude. Matt. 14. 14-21. Hymn 325, “Break thou the bread of life.” 6. Walking on the Sea. Matt. 14. 24-33. Hymn 61 (8d verse), “Thou, who in darkness walking didst appear.” - 7. The Raising of Lazarus. John 11. 32-45. Hymn 134 (ist and 5th verses), “‘When gathering clouds around I see.” 8. The Miracle of the Resurrection. John 20. 1-9. Hymn 157, “The Lord is risen indeed.” 9. The Ascension. Luke 24. 50-53. Hymn 170, “He is gone; a cloud of light.” 10. Salvation—The Greatest Miracle. Luke 24. 39-43. Hymn 289, “Of Him who did sdlvation bring.” Closing Hymn, 512 (1st two verses), ‘To God in every want.” “In shouts, or silent awe, adore His miracles of grace.” Topic for Discussion ; “What is the Most Impressive Miracle?” HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 269 5. Tae Breatirupes Opening Hymn, 502, “Prayer is appointed to convey _ The blessings God designs to give.” Prayer. Responsive Reading: Matt. 5. 1-12. (After the responsive reading, let the congregation recite in unison each beatitude before singing the hymn; also the leader may make some introductory comments upon each beatitude in turn.) 1. Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Hymn 472, “I bow my forehead in the dust.” 2. Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Hymn 526, “Come, ye disconsolate.” ; 8. Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Hymn 685, “Jesus, meek and gentle.” 4. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after right- eousness: for they shall be filled. Hymn 233, “The King of heaven his table spreads.” 5. Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. Hymn 378 (beginning with 3d verse), “That I thy mercy may proclaim.” 6. Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. ~ Hymn 360, “‘Blest are the pure in heart.” 7. Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. Hymn 707, “God, the All-Terrible!” 8. Blessed are they which are persecuted for ‘righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Hymn 482 (beginning with 3d verse), “Who suffer with our Master here.” 9. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all. manner of evil against you falsely for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you. Hymn 415,.“‘Faith of our fathers!” Topic for Discussion: ‘Your Favorite Beatitude.” 270 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 6. THe Lorp’s PRAYER Opening Hymn, 497, ‘Prayer is the soul’s sincere desire.” Prayer (followed by the Lord’s Prayer in concert). (This service may be used in the same way as the service on “The Beatitudes” with comments by the leader upon each phrase, or each topic may be assigned to a different person for three minutes.) 1. Our Father who art in heaven. Hymn 79 (4 verses), ‘Father, how wide thy glory shines!” 2. Hallowed be thy name. Hymn 180, “All hail the power of Jesus’ name!” 3. Thy kingdom come. Hymn 208, “I love thy kingdom, Lord.” 4. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Hymn 524, “My Jesus, as thou wilt.” 5. Give us this day our daily bread. Hymn 325, “Break thou the bread of life.” 6. Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that tres- pass against us. Hymn 98, “‘There’s a wideness in God’s mercy.” 7. Lead us not into temptation. Hymn 431, ‘In the hour of trial.” 8. Deliver us from evil. Hymn 577 (1st two verses), “O God, our help in ages past.” 9. Thine is the kingdom. Hymn 527, “The kingdom that I seek is thine.” 10. The power, Hymn 2, “Come, thou almighty King.” 11. The glory. Hymn 49, “Glory to thee, my God.” Topic for Discussion: “The Power of Prayer.” HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 271 7. Tae Name or Carist . Revelation of His Name. Gen. 32. 24-30. Hymn 511 (verses 1, 3, 6), “Come, O thou Traveler unknown.” 2. Salvation through His Name. Acts 4. 8-12. Hymn 1 (verses 3, 4), “Jesus! the name that charms our fears!” . Strength against Temptation. Prov. 18. 10; Acts 3. 13-16. Hymn 363 (verses 4, 5), “O, utter but the name of God.” 4. A Foundation for Character. Col. 3. 14~17. Hymn 330 (verses 1, 3), “My hope is built on nothing less.” 5. The Name Victorious. 2 Chron. 14. 7-12. Hymn 11 (verses 1, 2), “Ye servants of God.” 6. The Supremacy of His Name. Psa. 113. 1-5; Eph. 1. 21. Hymn 222 (verses 1, 2), “Jesus, the name high over all.” . A Name to Trust. Psa. 9. 7-10. Hymn 441 (verses 1, 2), “I’m not ashamed to own my Lord.” 8. A Name to Love. Psa. 72. 17-19. Hymn 137, “How sweet the name of Jesus sounds!” 9. A Precious Name. 1 Pet. 2. 1-7. Hymn 508, “Take the name of Jesus with you.” Prayer. Closing Hymn, 354 (verses 1, 5), “O for a heart to praise my God.” Topic for Discussion: “Which Name Applied to Christ is Dearest to You?” 272 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 8. Tot ResvURRECTION 1. Palm Sunday. Matt. 21. 1-11. Hymn 150, “Ride on, ride on, in majesty.” 2. Gethsemane. Matt. 26. 36-46. Hymn 147, ‘’Tis midnight; and on Olives’ brow.” 3. The Crucifixion. Mark 15. 24-39. Hymn 146, ‘Alas! and did my Saviour bleed?” 4. The Return from the Cross. Matt. 27. 55-66. Hymn 152 (verses 1, 4), “O come and mourn with me awhile.” 5. The Dawn of Easter Day. John 20. 1-13. Hymn 166, “Welcome, happy morning!” 6. Christ Forsakes the Tomb. John 20. 14-17. Hymn 165 (verses 3, 4, 5), “The rising God forsakes the tomb.” : 7. His Friends Learn of the Resurrection. John 20. 18-29. Hymn 159, “Lift your glad voices.” 8. The Significance of Easter. 1 Cor. 15. 12-22. Hymn 156, “Christ the Lord is risen to-day.” 9. A Spiritual Release for Israel. Acts 3. 18-26. Hymn 163, ‘Come, ye faithful, raise the strain.” 10. Job’s Faith in Immortality. Job 19. 25-27. Hymn 168, “I know that my Redeemer lives.” 11. The Coronation of Christ. Rev. 5. 8-13. Hymn 169, “Look, ye saints, the sight is glorious.” Topic for Discussion: ‘The Comfort and Hope Begotten by the Resurrection of Christ.”’ HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 273 9. Otp TresTaMENT HEeRoEs 1. The Saints of Old. Heb. 11. 13-16. Hymn 187, “O for that flame of living fire!” 2. Abraham—the Friend of God. Gen. 22. 15-18. Hymn 4, “The God of Abraham praise” (1st, 2d, and 6th verses). 3. The Faith of Job. Job 2. 1-3. Hymn 370, “I know that my Redeemer lives.” 4. The Victory of Jacob. Gen. 32. 24-30. Hymn 511, “Come, O thou Traveler unknown.” 5. The Vision of Moses. Deut. 34. 1-5. Hymn 604, “There is a land of pure delight.” 6. The Obedience of Samuel. 1 Sam. 3. 1-19. Hymn 674, ‘‘(Hushed was the evening hymn.” 7. The Harp of David. 1 Sam. 16. 19-23. Hymn 71, “Sweet is the work, my God, my King” (2 verses). 8. The Twenty-third Psalm. Psa. 23 (in concert). Hymn 136, “The King of love my Shepherd is.” Closing Hymn, 12, “O Thou to whom, in ancient time, The lyre of Hebrew bards was strung.” Topic for Discussion: “Your Favorite Old Testament Hero.” 274 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 10. New TrstaMENT Heros Opening Hymn, Thanks for the Saints. Hymn 14 (second tune, verses 1, 2, 3, 6), ““To thee, Eternal Soul.” The Apostles. Peter, James, and John. Matt. 17. 1-8. Hymn 129, “The chosen three on mountain height.” A Tempest on the Sea. Mark 4. 36-41. Hymn 485, ‘Fierce raged the tempest.” The Last Supper. Matt. 26. 19-30. Hymn. 233, “The King of heaven his table spreads.” The Disciples at Emmaus. Luke 24. 13-21 and 28-32. Hymn 50, “Abide with me!” John, the Disciple, Whom Jesus Loved. John 13. 23-26. Hymn 368 (verses 1, 2, 5), “O Love divine, how sweet thou art!” Peter, the Apostle. Penitence. Luke 22. 54-62. Hymn 491, “Jesus, let thy pitying eye.” In Prison. Acts 5. 17-23. yan to (verses 4, 5), “Long my imprisoned spirit ay.” Stephen, the Martyr. Acts 7. 54-60. Hymn 416, “The Son of God goes forth to war.” Paul, the Saint. His Inspiration. Phil. 4. 10-20. eee (verses 1, 2), “O for that flame of living re! His Preparation. Eph. 6. 10-17. Hymn 397, “Behold, the Christian warrior stands.” His Victory. 1 Tim. 6. 11-16. Hymn 391 (verses 1, 4), “I the good fight have fought.” Closing Hymn, 430, ‘For all the Saints.” Topic for Discussion: “Your Favorite New Testament Hero.” 10. 11. 12. HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 275 11. Tue Journey or Israzn . The Escape from Egypt. Exod. 14. 22-30. Hymn 163 (verse 1), “Come, ye faithful, raise the strain.” . Heavenly Manna. Exod. 16. 11-18. Hymn 438 (verses 1, 2), “Day by day the manna fell.” . In the Wilderness: a Prayer for Guidance. Deut. 9. 25-29. Hymn 91, “Guide me, O thou great Jehovah.” . The Cloud by Day: the Fire by Night. Exod. 13. 20-22. Hymn 95, “When Israel of the Lord beloved.” . The Voice of God. Exod. 20: 1-18. Hymn 211 (verses 1, 2), “Hear what God the Lord hath spoken.” . Onward through the Wilderness. Deut. 1. 5-11. Hymn 567, “Through the night of doubt and sorrow.” . Moses’ Vision from the Mountain. Deut. 34. 1-6. Hymn 604, “There is a land of pure delight.” . Marching Song. Josh. 1. 10-16. Hymn 384 (Ist and last verses), “Forward be our watchword.” . At the River. Josh. 3. 7-13. Hymn 617 (1st, 2d, and last verses), “On Jordan’s stormy banks I stand.” The Battle. Josh. 6. 12-21. Hymn 448, ‘God is my strong salvation.” Possession of the Promised Land. Josh. 18. 3~10. Hymn 403, ‘Defend us, Lord.” (Tune “Joshua.’’) Victory through Divine Power. Psa. 48. 1-14. Hymn 212, “Zion stands with hills surrounded.” Topic for Discussion: ‘What was the most Significant Event between Egypt and the Jordan?” 276 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 12. Tue PRopHETS AND PROPHECIES 1. The Music of the Prophets. Psa. 95. 1-6. Hymn 12 (verses 1, 3, 5), “O Thou, to whom in ancient time.” 2. The Inspiration of Prophecy., 1 Pet. 1. 3-12. a 181 (verses 1, 2), “Come, Holy Ghost, our earts inspire.” 3. The Pathway of the Prophets. Heb. 11. 32-40. Hymn 306 (verses 1, 2), “Jesus, my all, to heaven is gone.” 4. Prophecy Concerning the Coming of Christ. Isa. 9. 1-7. ymn 108 (verses 1, 5), “Hark, the glad sound! the , Saviour comes, The. Saviour promised long.” 5. Prophecy Concerning the Cross. Isa. 53. 3-10. ymn 149 (verses 2, 3), “ ’Tis finished! all that heaven foretold ‘ By prophets in the days of o 2? 6. The Golden Age. Psa. 72. 3-18. Hymn 110 (verse 5), “For lo! the days are hastening on By prophet-bards foretold.” 7. The Testimony of the Prophets. Acts 2. 25-36. H 293, “Art thou weary, art thou languid?” (Verses 1, 2, 6, 7.) 8. Thanks for Prophecy. (Prayer.) Hymn 14 (verses 1, 2, 4), “To thee, Eternal Soul, be whe o from of old to our own days Through souls of saints and prophets, Lord, Hast sent thy light, thy love, thy word.” Topic for Discussion: ‘““Who was the Greatest Prophet?” HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 277 13. Missions AND Messencers Opening Hymn, 111, ‘Hark! the herald angels sing!” 1. 10. 11. 12. The Call. Acts 16. 6-10. Hymn 655, “From Greenland’s icy mountains.” . The Command. Mark 16. 14-19. Hymn 634, “Tell it out among the heathen.” . Prayer for Divine Guidance. Acts 4. 24-33. Hymn 220, “Jesus, the truth and power divine, Send forth these messengers of thine.” . Response by the Messengers. Acts 10. 34~43. Hymn 219, “Lord of the living harvest.” . Parting Charge to the Messengers. John 20. 19-22. ‘Hymn 640, “Go, ye messengers of God!” . The Field, the Inspiration to Work. Psa. 2. 1-10. Hymn 654 (verses 2, 3, 4), “Behold how many thou- sands,” . The Invitation. Acts 2. 29-39. Hymn 259 (second tune), “Come, ye sinners,” . The Penitence of the Nations. Acts 2. 40-43. Hymn 653, “The morning light is breaking.” . The Fire of Salvation. Acts 2. 1-4. Hymn 643, ‘See, how great a flame aspires!” The Signs of the Times. Isa. 21.6-12. Hymn 636, ‘Watchman, tell us of the night.” The Final Conquest Completed. Rev. 22. 1-6. Hymn 631, “Jesus shall reign where’er the sun.” The Banner of Victory. (Recessional.) Hymn 639 (verses 1, 3, 4, 6), “Fling out the banner y’ Topic for Discussion: “Our Duty toward Missions.” 278 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 14, Tae Mountains Opening Hymn, 649 (verses 2, 3), “See how beauteous on the mountains.” 1. Hores—The Mountain of Covenant. Lev. 20. 22-26. Hymn 403, ‘Defend us, Lord, from every ill.” 2. Piscan—The Mountain of Vision. Deut. 34. 1-6. Hymn 516 ( verses 1, 3), “Sweet hour of prayer.” 3. Harrin—The Mountain of the Beatitudes. Matt. 5. 1-16. Hymn 360, “Blest are the pure in heart.” 4. Hermon—The Mountain of Transfiguration. Mark 9. 2-10. Hymn 131, “O Master, it is good to be High on the mountain here with thee.” 5. Otrves—The Mountain of Anguish. Luke 22. 39-48. Hymn 147, “Tis midnight; and on Olive’s brow.” 6. Canvary—The Mountain of Crucifixion. Tuke 23. 32-47. Hymn 152, “O come and mourn with me awhile.” 7. Ottvet—The Mountain of Ascension. Luke 24. 45-53. Hymn 162, “Hail the day that sees him rise.” Closmg Hymn, 423 (verses 5, 6), “O Master, from the mountain side.” Topic for Discussion: “The Mountain-tops of Christian Ex- perience.” HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 279 15. THe Sea . Prayer for Those at Sea. Psa. 107. 21-31. Hymn 59 (verses 1, 3), “(Now the day is over.” 2. The Sinful Soul on Life’s Ocean. Isa. 57. 15-21. Hymn 246 (verses 1, 2), “Sinners, the voice of God regard.” . Christ in the Storm. Matt. 8. 18-27. Hymn 485, “Fierce raged the tempest o’er the deep.”’ . Jesus Walking on the Waves. Matt. 14. 22-33. Hymn 61 (verses 1, 3), “The day is gently sinking to a close.” . A Voice Divine Across the Waves. John 21. 3-9, 15-19. Hymn 545, “Jesus calls us o’er the tumult.” . “Pilot Me!” Psa. 48. 7-14. Hymn 482, “Jesus, Saviour, pilot me.” . Safe to the Land! Isa. 33. 17-21; Ezek. 27. 29. Hymn 451, “My bark is wafted to the strand.” . The Ocean of God’s Love. Psa. 107. 1-8. Hymn 98, “There’s a wideness in God’s mercy Like the wideness of the sea.” Topic for Discussion: “The Most Significant Sea Episode in the Bible.” 280 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 16. Carpren’s Day SERvICE Processional: Hymn 383, ‘Onward, Christian soldiers!” 1, The Children of Israel in the Desert. Exod. 40. 32~38. Hymn 681, ‘Brightly gleams our banner.” 2. The Child in the Temple. Sam. 3. 3-18. Hymn 674, ‘“Hushed was the evening hymn.” 3. The Christ Child. Luke 2. 40-52. Hymn 678 (verses 5 and 6, or the whole hymn), “O Thou whose infant feet were found.” 4. The Child in Jesus’ Arms. Mark 10. 13-16. Hymn 682, “I think when I read that sweet story of old.” 5. The Child on Palm Sunday. Mark 11. 1-11. Hymn 684, “There was a time when children sang.” 6. The ee in the Early Christian Church. Eph. 6. 1-3, 1 Hymn 672, “Shepherd of tender youth.” (The oldest Christian hymn extant, by Clement, A. D. 170-220.) 7. The Offerings of the Child. (Collection for Christian Education.) Hymn 673, “‘Beauteous are the flowers of earth.” 8. Prayer. Hymn 677, “Saviour, like a shepherd lead us.” 9. Recessional. Hymn 680, ‘“There’s a Friend for little children.” 10. 11. HOW TO USE THE HYMNAL 281 17. SOLDIERS OF THE CROSS - The Call for Volunteers. Matt. 16. 24-27. Hymn 416, “The Son of God goes forth to war.” . The Response. Isa. 6. 5-12. Hymn 393 (verses 1, 4, 5), “Am I a soldier of the cross?” . Swearing Allegiance. 2 Chron. 15. 10-15. Hymn 413 (verses 1, 2, 3), “Stand, soldier of the cross.”” . The Armor. Eph. 6. 11-18. Hymn 397 (verses 1, 2,3), “Behold, the Christian warrior stands!’ . The Call to Arms. Judg. 6. 13-16. Hymn 386, “Stand up, stand up for Jesus!” . Prayer to God for Defense. 2 Kings 19. 14-19. Hymn 403 (verses 1, 2), “Defend us, Lord, from every ill.” . The Captain. Heb. 2. 5-10. Hymn 408, ‘Lead on! O King eternal!” . The Watchword. Judg. 12. 4-6 (Shibboleth). Hymn 420 (verses 1, 2), ‘‘ True-hearted, whole- hearted.” . Forward into Battle. Judg. 8. 16-22. Hymn 383 (verses 1, 2, 3), “Onward, Christian soldiers!” The Fight. 1 Tim. 6. 11-16. Hymn 409 (verses 1, 4), “Fight the good fight.” The Victory. 1 Cor. 15. 52-58. Hymn 418 (verses 1, 2), “We march, we march to victory!” 282 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 18. THe Sovu’s Procress 1. The Depths of Sin. Rom. 7. 18-24. Hymn 242 (1st verse), “Plunged in a gulf of dark despair.” 2. Warning. Matt. 3. 7-12. Hymn 247, ‘Sinners, turn; why will ye die?” 3. Judgment and Retribution. Rom. 2. 3-9. Hymn 603, “The day of wrath, that dreadful day.” 4. Conviction. Acts 16. 25-31. Hymn 267, “Depth of mercy! can there be?” 5. Invitation. Matt. 11. 25-30. Hymn 259, ‘Come, ye sinners, poor and needy.” 6. Acceptance. Matt. 9. 1-8. Hymn 272, “Just as I am.” 7. Faith. Heb. 11. 1-10. Hyman 301, “Arise, my goul, arise.” 8. Witness of the Spirit. Acts 2. 1-4. Hymn 304, “I heard the voice of Jesus say” (1st two verses). 9. Aspiration. Psa. 42. 1-5. Hymn 317, “More love, O Christ, to thee.” 10. Consecration. Isa. 6. 5-12. Hymn 348, “Take my life, and let it be consecrated.” 11. Temptation. Matt. 4. 1-11. Hymn 493, “My soul, be on thy guard.” 12. Activity. James 2. 14-26. Hymn 397, “Behold, the Christian warrior.” 13. Heaven. Rev. 22, 1-5. Hymn 623, “Rise, my soul.” APPENDIX A Pian For Hymnar-Srupy Cuasses, Usine tHE HYMNaL AND Tuts VoLtume as TEXTBOOKS BisLE-stupy and mission-study classes are becoming im- portant factors in arousing an intelligent interest in the teach- ings and work of the church. But why should we not also develop Hymnal-Study Classes to kindle a more intelligent interest in our worship? The very subject of the study should prove fascinating to young and old, and with wise leadershi such classes could be mis a success in almost every aiureh in Methodism. For the guidance of leaders of Hymnal-Study Classes the following outline has been prepared, more for purposes of suggestion than for prescribing a hard-and-fast course of study. The scheme may be varied according to the abilities and in- terests of the class and its leader. In the topics for preparation, pea encouragement should be given to the student to select illustrations for each point first-hand from the Hymnal. Frequently, if possible, the class should sing the hymns— especially after oer have been analyzed in respect to the par- ticular theme of that week’s lesson. This should familiarize the class with many new hymns, and also with the best methods of studying other new hymns yet unlearned. Nor need the study be confined to Methodists. An inter- denominational class may find this plan of study of value, if only the first lesson be modified or omitted. Should such classes prove to be successful, the writer would be interested to hear of the progress of the class. If, as is intended, this study awakens a deeper interest in the oe and their music, the effort of organizing and conducting the class would be well worth while. Leeson I. Hymna History Assignment for Reading: Part I, Chapters 1, 2, and 3. Topics for Special Preparation: 1. The Eighteenth Century Hymnals. 2. The Official Methodist Episcopal Hymnals (North and South). 3. The Making of the Present Hymnal. 283 284 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 4, The Hymnal and Other Factors, hastening the Union of ae o Methodist Episcopal Churches, North and uth. 5. A Critique of Hymnals, Now Used in Other Denomina- tions. (Examine the hymnals in other churches in your town.) Lesson II. Sprarrvat Conprrions Propucine Hymns Assignment for Reading: Part II, Chapter 4, pp. 59-79. Topies for Special Preparation: 1. Old Testament Hymns, of Moses, Hannah, David. 2. New Testament Hymns, of Mary, the Gloria in Excelsis, Revelation. 3. Sorrow-Inspired Hymns. 4. Joy-Inspired Hymns. 5. Hymns Celebrating Conversion from Sin. Lesson III. Tae Power or Hymns in Human Lire Assignment for Reading: Chapter 4, pp. 79-94. Topics for Special Preparation: 1. New Hymn Stories (let the members of the Class ask several Christian people for their experiences with hymns). 2. The Effectiveness of Hymns in the Salvation of Souls. 3. Hymns at the Portal of Death. 4. War Songs. 5. The Different Ways in which Hymns are Used. Lesson IV. Tse ScHooits or Hymn-Warirers in EnGuiisa Assignment for Reading: Chapter 5, pp. 95-112. Topics far Special Preparation: es 1. Famous Literary Folk who were Hymn-Writers. 2. The Eighteenth Century Hymn-Writers. 3. The Oxford Movement and Hymmody and the Wesleyan Movement. 4. Clergymen as Hymn-Writers. 5. Hymn-Writing in America. APPENDIX 285 Lesson V. Hymns in Foreign LANGUAGES Assignment for Reading: Chapter 5, pp. 112-128. Topies for Special Preparation: . The Greek Hymnists. . Hymns from the Latin Church. . Wesley’s Translations from the German. . Hymns from the Hebrew Scriptures. . Missionary Hymns. Or WD Lesson VI. TxronogicaL TEACHING IN THE HYMNS Assignment for Reading: Chapter 6. Topics for Special Preparation: 1, The Hymns as Teachers of Theology. 2. What Hymns Can the Roman Catholics Use from Our Hymnal? 3. What Hymns Can the Unitarians Use from Our Hymnal? 4. Which of Our Hymns are Common to All Christians? 5. Which of Our Hymns are Peculiar to Methodism? Lesson VII. Tie Lrrerary Bravrizs or rus Hymne Assignment for Reading: Chapter 7. Topics for Special Preparation: 1. Emotions Expressed in the Hymns (with illustrations). 2. Subjective and Objective Hymna. 3. The Imagery in the Hymns. 4. Literary Blemishes in the Hymns of Other Hymnals. 5. The Rhythm of the Hymns. Lesson VIII. Tar Conrrieution or Eacu Nation To THE TUNES oF THE HYMNAL Assignment for Reading: Chapter 8. Topies for Special Preparation: 1. Musie as a Universal Language. 2. Hymn-Tune Composers from the Continent of Europe. 3. Hymn-Tune Composers from Great Britain. 4, American Hymn-Tune Composers. 286 MUSIC AND HYMNODY 5. Larger Compositions from which Hymn-Tunes are De- rived. (Under this heading it would add interest if some musician would render some of the larger sources of hymn-tunes.) See page 263. Lesson IX. Srorres or Trax Tunes anv THEIR TITLES Assignment for Reading: Chapter 9 and a Review of Chapter 8. Topics for Special Preparation: 1. How Tunes are Composed (see text). 2. What are the Best Tunes? 3. Different Reasons for Choosing Tune-Titles. 4. National and Patriotic Tunes in the Hymnal. 5. Secular Songs that have Made Hymn-Tunes. Lesson X. INTERPRETATION OF THE Hymns THROUGH THE Music Assignment for Reading: Chapter 10. Topics for Special Preparation: . Should Hymn-Tunes be Emotional, and Why? . What Hymn-Tunes Best Describe the Emotions of Words? . Examples of Emotional Incongruity between Hymns and Words. i . Should Music be Employed to Describe Events or Episodes. . A Study of Hymns 250-275, and their Relative Emotional Powers. Oe one Lesson XI. Format ELemMents or Music Assignment for Reading: Chapter 11. Topics for Special Preparation: 1. The Value of Tunes with a Chorus. 2. What is the Purpose of Form in Music? 3. Which Keys are Best Suited to Hymn-Tunes? 4 5 . What Elements of Form are Illustrated in the Hymn- Tunes? . Find Illustrations of Poor Forms. Lesson XII. Review anp Practica APPLICATION OF THE CouRsE Assignment for Reading: Chapter 12. General Review. INDEX Lines in quotation are first lines of hymns. Lines in italics are titles of tunes. “A mighty fortress is our God,” 122, 254 (see ‘Ein’ Feste Burg” “Abide with me,” 68, 104, 184, 193, 194, 226 Aare Mrs. Sarah F,, 110, 111, Addison, Joseph, 77, 97, 156, 226 Ahle, Johann Rudolf, 171 “Alas! and did my Saviour,” 87, 88, 187 Aldrich, Henry, 176 Alexander, Mrs. C. F., 111, 125 Alexander, J. W., 120, 122 Alford, Dean Henry, 75, 104 “All glory, laud,” 118 “All hail! the power,” 89, 101 All Saints, 176 Alsace, 197 Alverson, J. B., 27 | ‘Am I a soldier of the,” 151 America, 48, 176, 200, 236, 240 Amsterdam, 177 ‘Ancient of days,” 108 And are we yet alive?” 82 “And can it be that I,” 61 ‘Another six days’ work,” 102 Antioch, 172, 196 “Arise, my soul, arise,” 86 Arlington, 176, 199 Armenia, 188 Arne, Thomas A., 176, 199 “Art thou weary, art thou,” 117, 127, 159 “As pants the hart for,” 114 Asbury, Bishop, 19, 20, 21 Ashford, Mrs. E. L., 195, 208 “Asleep in Jesus,” 76, 223 Auber, Miss Harriet, 110 Austria, 187 “Author of faith,’ 127 Avison, 178 “Awake, our souls! away,” 151 Babcock, Rev. Dr. M. D., 109 Baker, Rev. Sir H. W., 82, 105, 106, 183, 206 Barbauld, Mrs. Anna L., 110 Baring-Gould, Rev. 8., 105, 113 Barnby, Sir J., 181, 190, 207, 211, 214, 222 241 Barthélémon, F. H., 174 Bartholdy, 197 Bartlett, Dr. Maro L., 195 Bathurst, Rev. William H., 104 Baume, John W., 196, 211 Baxter, Richard, 67, 97 Beddome, Rev. Benjamin, 102 Beethoven, 173, 197, 200, 228 “Before Jehovah's awful throne,” 89 on the Christian warrior,” “Behold the Saviour of man- kind,” 85, 100 Belleville, 193 Bentley, 185 Bernard of Clairvaux, 120, 122 Bernard of Cluny, 119 Bickersteth, Rev. Dr. Edward H., 105, 148, 158 Black, J. M., 36 Blacklock, Rev. Thomas, 70 “Blessed assurance,” 70, 90, 205 “Blest are the pure,” 103 “Blest be the dear uniting,” 90 “Blest be the tie,” 74, 102 Boardman, 189 Boehm, Anthony W., 122 Bonar, Dr. Horatius, 75, 104 287 288 Borthwick, Jane, 124 Bortnianski, D. S., 186 Bourignon, Antoinette, 113 Bowring, Sir John, 105, 133, 157 Bradbury, 190 Bradbury, William B., 190 Bradford, 197 Bremen, 171, 202, 243 Breviaries, 118 Bridge, Sir Frederick, 51, 185 Bridges, Matthew, 104 oe Bishop Phillips, 78, 10 Brown, Mrs. Phoebe H. 73 Browning, Mrs. Elizabeth B., 106 Bryant, William Cullen, 75, 107 Burgmiller, Frederick, 199 Caledonia, 92, 178 Camp, John Spencer, 196, 202 Campbell, Rev. Dr. James, 37 Campbell, Miss Jane, 125 Canonbury, 198 Carey, Henry, 176, 200, 236 Cary, 192 Cary, Miss Phoebe, 69 Caswell, E. M., 118, 120, 121, 125 Cennick, John, 101 Chetham, John, 176 Christ Church, 185 “Christ for the world,” 76 “Christ is made the sure,” 119 “Christian! dost thou see,” 117, 220, 221. Christmas, 196 Claudius, Matthias, 125 Reber: Rev. Dr. ¢. M., 32, 204, Codner, Mrs. Elizabeth, 64 Coke, Bishop Thomas, 17, 19, 22 Coles, Rev. George, 188 “Come, Holy Ghost, in,” 119 “Come, Holy Spirit, heavenly Dove,” 86 ‘Come, let us anew our,” 87 “Come, let us join our,” 87, 116 “Come, O my soul!” 70 “Come, O thou all victorious Lord,” 79 “Come, O thou Traveler,” 160 INDEX “Come, said Jesus’ sacred,’’ 110 “Come, Saviour, Jesus,” 113 “Come, sound his praise,” 72 “Come, thou almighty." 93 “Come, thou Fount,” 64, 102 “Come, ye disconsolate,’”’ 106 “Come, ye faithful,”’ 117 “Come, ye sinners,” 60, 102 “Come, ye that love the Lord,” 91, 250 “Commit thou all thy,” 124 Communion, 187 Conkey, Ithamar, 189 Converse, Charles C., 191 Cooke, Bishop R. J., 32 Cooper, Ezekiel, 19, 20 Copeland, Rev. Dr. Benjamin, 109, 208, 209 Coronation, 187, 202 Cowper, William, 74, 97, 98, 99, 1138, 116 Creamer, David, 27 Creation, 198 “Creator, Spirit! by whose,” 119 Crimea, 194, 214 Croft, William, 176, 201, 212 Crosby, Fanny (Mrs. Van Al- styne), 43, 66, 70, 88, 90, 111. Cross, Dr. Moses 8., 196 Cross of Jesus, 198, 243, 244 “Crown him with many,” 104 Criger, Johann, 171, 201 Crusader’s Hymn, 170, 201 D’Urhan, Crétien, 174 “Day of wrath, O dreadful,” 119 “Dear Lord and Father,” 107 Decius, 171, 200, 203 Decius, Nicolas, 122, 171, 201 Deems, Rev. Dr. Charles F., 108 Dennis, 174, 227 Denny, Sir Edward, 105 Dessler, Wolfgang C., 123 Deventer, 187, 213 Dexter, Rev. Dr. H.M., 109, 117 Diademata, 182, 207 Dilley, David, 27 Dirge, 197 Doane, Bishop George W., 108 Doane, Bishop W. C., 108 INDEX Doane, William Howard, 191 Doddridge, Rev. Dr. Philip, 97, 98, 116 Doxology, 96, 189 Dryden, John, 119 Du Bose, Rev. Dr. H. M., 37 Duane Street, 188 Duffield, Dr. George, Jr., 108 Duffield, Dr. 8S. W., 87, 89, 93 Duke Street, 177 Dundee, 178, 242 Dunham, Henry M., 193 Dunstan, 190, 241 ; Dwight, Timothy, 106, 115 Dykes, Rev. J. B., 181, 193, 207, 211, 212, 215, 220, 221 Edson, Lewis, 187 Eighmey, 194 Ein’ Feste Burg, 91, 122, 171, 200, 205, 238, 243 Elizabethtown, 189 Ellers, 182 Ellerton, Rev. John, 75, 105 Elliott, Miss Charlotte, 110 Elvey, Sir George Job, 182, 212 Emerson, Luther O., 189 Emmons, 199 Even me, 190 Evening Hymn, 175 Evening Prayer, 191 Every Day and Hour, 191 Ewing, 183, 184, 236, 242 Faber, Rev. Dr. F. W., 103, 132 Fabricius, Jacob, 92, 125 “Fairest. Lord Jesus,” 125 “Faith is a living power,” 125 “Faith of our fathers!” 104, 132 “Father, whate’er of,’’ 66 Faweett, Rev. Dr. John, 74, 102 “Fear not, O little,” 92, 125 Federal Street, 188 Ferguson, 189 Festal Song, 192 Fillmore, 187 “ile raged the tempest,” 218, 1 Fisk, 210 Flemming, 173 289 Flemming, Friedrich F., 174 “Fling out the banner,” 108 Floy, Rev. James, 26, 27 “Flung to the heedless,” 123 “For all the saints,”’ 105 “For thee, O dear, dear coun- try)” 119 “Forward be our watchword,” 75, 104, 151 Francis, Rev. Benjamin, 102 Frederick, 189 “From Greenland’s icy moun- tains,” 75, 103, 159, 254 Gauntlett, Henry John, 180, 204 Genevan Psalter, 173, 174 Gerhardt, Paul, 122, 123, 124 Gethsemane, 182, 206 Giardini, Felice de, 186 Gilder, 173. Gilder, Richard Watson, 53, 80, 108, 133, 208 Gilead, 174 Gill, Rev. Dr. B., 194, 213 Gilmore, Rev. J. H., 76, 109 ‘Give to the winds thy,” 124 Gladden, Rev. Dr. W., 109 Gloria in Exeelsis, 121, 122 Gloria Patri, 182 “Glorious things of thee are,” 99, 253 ‘Glory be to the Father,’’ 80 “God be with you,” 90, 109 “God calling yet! shall I,” 124 “Golden harps are sounding,” 83 Goodrich, Charles G., 194, 211 Goodsell, Bishop Daniel A., 8, 36, 39, 138, 186 Gottschalk, Louis M., 198 Gouda, 187, 213 Gould, Nathaniel D., 188 Gounod, Charles Frangois, 174, 185, 198 Grant, Sir Robert, 102, 103, 105 156 Greatorex, Henry W., 182 Green Hill, 184 Greenville, 174, 198 Gregory, Pope, 169, 170 290 Gruber, Franz, 201 “Guide me, O thou great Jeho- vah,” 101 Guyon, Madame J. M. B. de la M., 72, 113 Habakkuk, 180 “Hail to the Lord’s anointed,” 74 Hamilton, Jefferson, 24 Hammond, Rev. William, 101 Handel, George F., 122, 172, 173 196 Hankey, Katherine, 66 Hanover, 176 ‘Hark, the voice of Jesus call- ing,” 151 Harrington, Calvin S., 38, 40, Hartington, Claude W., 212 arrington, Claude W., Harrington, Karl P., 8, 40, 192, 193, 213, 214 Harris, Thoro, 194, 214 Hart, Rev. Joseph, 60, 102 Hassler, H. L., 171, 199, 201 ‘fHasten, Lord, the glorious time,” 110 ' Hastings, Thomas, 106, 187, 188 Havergal, Frances Ridley, 63, 67, 83, 106, 111 Hay, John, 107 Haydn Francis Joseph, 187, 198, 226 Hayes, 197 “He leadeth me,” 76, 109, 190 Heber, 189 Heber, Bishop R.., 75, 103, 159 Hides, Rev. Dr. Frederick H., Herbert, George, 97 Herbert, Petrus, 125 ‘Here, O my Lord, I see,” 75 Herold, Louis. Joseph F., 174 Hesperus, 183 Hews, George, 188 High on his everlasting,” 123 Hitt, Daniel, 20, 21 Hodges, Edward, 180 Holden, Oliver, 106, 187, 202 Holland, Dr. J: G., 47, 107, 156 173, INDEX Holley, 188 Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 107 Holmfirth, 193 “Holy Ghost, dispel our,” 124 Holy Hill, 194 Hopkins, Edward John, 182 Hoss, Bishop E. E., 36 How, Bishop William W., 105 “How are thy servants blest, O Lord,” 77, 97 ‘How happy is the pilgrim’s lot,” 101 ‘How sad our state,” 87 Humpbrey, Pelham, 176 Huntington, Rev. Dr. D.C., 35 Hursley, 184, 214 Hymn of Joy, 197 “TI bow my forehead,” 107 “I heard the voice of Jesus say,” 104, 207 “T know no life divided,”’ 125 “T lay my sins on Jesus,” 104 “T love thy kingdom,” 115. “Tl praise my Maker while I’ve breath,” 81 “T’m but a stranger here,’’ 67 “I’m going home to die no more,” 93 “T need thee every hour,” 191 “T would not live alway,” 189 7 ieee thee, uncreated Sun,” 12 “I thirst, thou wounded Lamb of God,” 124 ‘fIn age and feebleness extreme,” 69, 185 ‘In the cross of Christ I glory,” 105, 133, 157, 163, 189, 254 “In the hour of trial,’’ 99 Ingalls, Jeremiah, 187 Ingemann, Bernhardt S., 113 Innocent UII., Pope, 120 Intercession New, 197 ‘Into the woods my Master went,” 108 vin thy gracious hands I fall,” “It came upon the midnight clear,” 107 INDEX — ae not be our lot to wield,” Italian Hymn, 186, 239 Jacobi, John C., 124 Jackson, Rev. H. G., 36 Jenks, Stephen, 187 “Jerusalem the golden,” 119, 184, 207, 236 ene can make a dying-bed,”’ “Jesus, Lover of my soul,” 47, 222, 236 “Jesus shal reign where’er the sun,” 90 aga the name high over all,” “Jesus, the very thought of thee,” 120, 230 thou Joy of loving hearts,” 120 “Jesus, thy blood and righteous- ness,” 63, 123, 224 ‘Jesus, thy boundless love,” 124 ‘Jesus, where’er thy people meet,”’ 74 Jewett, 198, 227 “Joy to the world! the Lord,” 136, 231 Jude, William H., 212 Julian, John, 15, 108 ‘Just as Iam, without one plea,” 82, 110, 190 Keble, Rev. John, 103, 214 Kelley, Rev. Thomas, 104 Ken, Bishop Thomas, 78, 96, 97 Kerlin, Rev. Dr. Robert T., 38 Kingsley, George, 189, 211 Kirbye, George, 176 Knapp, Mrs. Joseph F., 191 Knapp, William, 176 Lanier, Sidney, 107 “Late, late, so late,” 106 Lathbury, Miss M. A., 112 Lawes, Henry, 176 “Lead, kindly Light,” 64-66, 103, 160, 193 291 “Leave God to order all,” 124, 223 Lenox, 187 “Let heaven and earth,” 86 Linwood, 186 “Lo! He comes with clouds de- scending,’’ 101 “Lo! on a narrow neck of land,” 77 Een pe See 108 ongstreet, Augustus B., 24 “Tord, T hear of showers,” 64 “Lord, it belongs not,” 67, 97 “Lord of all being, throned afar,” 107 lord, while for all mankind,” 4 Lowry, Rev. Robert, 191 Luther, Martin, 9, 11, 91, 106, 122, 123, 130, 181, 153, 170, 171, 200 Lutkin, Peter C., 8, 40, 192, 193, 208, 209, 213 Lux Benigna, 180, 193 Lwoff, Alexis F., 186, 201 Lyte, Rev. Henry Francis, 68, 104, 184 Mackay, Margaret, 76 “Make haste, O man,” 128 Malan, Rev. A. H. G., 106 Mann, Arthur H., 185, 216 Manoah, 186 Margaret, 184, 185 Marlow, 176 Marsh, Simeon Butler, 188 Martyn, 188, 236 Marylebone, 185 Mason, Lowell, 170, 181, 187, 188, 189 Massie, Richard, 125 Matheson, Rev. Dr. George, 70, 71, 184 “May the grace of Christ,” 116 Medley, Rev. Samuel, 102 Mehul, Etienne Henri, 174 Meineke, Charles, 182 Melcombe, 199 Mendebras, 200, 206 Mendelssohn, 197 292 Mendelssohn, 171, 173, 197, 200, 201, 202, 208 Merrick, F, 27 Messenger, ‘John A., 123 Messiah, 174 Middletown, 204, 213 Miller, 178, 202 ' Milman, Dean H. H., 104 Milton, "John, 97, 115, 148 Mims, Dr. Edwin, 37 Monk, William Henry, 184 Moneell, Rev. J. S. B., 105 Montgomery, James, 68, 74, 97, 99, 115, 206, 207 Moore, Rev. Dr. J. M., 37, 210 “More love to thee, o Christ, pe 111, 191 M orning Fin, 174, 206 Mornington, 1 Mornington, asl of, 178 Mozart, 173 Munich, 171, 201, 243 7 country, tis of thee,” 108 “My looks up to thee,” 66, 10 “My God, I love thee, not be- cause, ” 121, 149 “My God, my Father, while I stray,” 110 wy nope is built on nothing less,” 134 “My hope, my all, my Saviour,” “My Jesus, as thou wilt,” 124 “My Lord, how full of sweet natant h 72, 113 My soul, "be on thy guard,” 225 “My oul before thee prostrate,” 93, Naegeli, Johann Georg, 174 Naomi, 174 National Hymn, 192 Nativity, 185 Neale, Dr. J. M., 117, 118, 119. “Near the cross was Mary weeping,” 120 ‘Nearer, my God, to thee,’ 82, 110, 133, 215 INDEX Neumark, Georg, 171, 202 “New every morning is the love,”’ 103 Newbold, 189 Newman, Cardinal John Henry, 65, 66, 103 Newton, Rev. John, 97, 98, 99, 116, 130, 137 Nitschmann, J. and Anna, 124 North, Rev. Dr. Frank Mason, 109° “Now God be with us,” 125 4 T have found the ground,” 1 “Now thank we all our God,” ‘92, 124, 250 Nun Danket, 171, 201, 205 Nunc Dimittis, 170 Nuremberg, 171, 243 Nutter, Rev. Dr. Charles 8., 32 “O come, all ye faithful,” 120 “O come, and mourn,” 127 “O day of rest and ’ gladness,” 104, 206, 226 “oO for a thousand tongues to sing,” 62 “O AB that flame of living fire,” 104 “O happy day,” 98 “‘O happy home where thou art,” 125 “oO Jesus, thou art standing,” 10 “© little town of Bethlehem,” 78 “O Lord, our fathers oft,” 115 “OQ Love divine, that,” 107 “O Love, that wilt not let me go,” 7 1, 184 “O Master, it is good to be,” 78 “O sacred Head, now wounded, oR 122, 147 “OQ thou God of my salvation,” 101 “Q thou, to whose all-search- 106, 125, ing. “ hou, who driest the mourn- er’s,” 106 INDEX “O worship the King,’’ 103 a the thoughts of God,” 6 “Of Him, who did salvation bring,” 122 Ol unared, 173, 199, 200, 206, Oldberg, Arne, 173 Oliver, Henry Kemble, 188 ea Rev. Thomas, 101, 113, 52 Olmutz, 170 Olney, 174, 185, 198 “One more day’s work for Je- sus,” 191 “One sweetly solemn thought,” 69, 165, 224 “Onward, Christian soldiers!’ 105, 182, 212, 224, 225 Ortonville, 188 Paisello, Giovanni, 186 Palmer, Rev. Dr. Ray, 66, 108, 120 Pass me not, 191 Parker, Rev. Dr. F.S., 37, 210 Parry, Sir Charles Hubert H., 185, 186, 228 Passion Chorale, 171, 199, 201 Patten, David, Jr., 27 Peace, A. L., 184 ‘Peace, perfect Baa 105, 227 Perronet, Rev. Edward, 102 Pleyel, Ignaz Joseph, 187, 198 Pleyel’s Hymn, 187, 198, 227 Pond, Sylvester Billings, 188 Pontius, William H., 194 Portuguese Hymn, 202 “Praise God, from whom,” 96 “Prayer is the soul’s sincere,” 99 Precious name, 191 Prentiss, Mrs. E. P., 111 Procter, Adelaide Ann, 111 Purcell, Thomas, 176, 185 Puritan, 193 Quayle, Bishop W. A., 31 Radiant Morn, 174, 206 Rankin, Rev. Dr. J. E., 109 293 Rathbun, 189 Redhead, R., 182, 215, 239 Redner, Lewis Henry, 192 “Rescue the perishing,” 66, 191 Retreat, 188 “Return, O wanderer,” 147 Rice, Mrs. Caroline Laura, 112 a Rev. Dr. Christian F., “Ride on, ride on in majesty,” Rinkart, Martin, 124 “Rise, glorious Conqueror,” 104 ‘Rise, my soul, and stretch thy wings,” 101 Ritter, Peter, 184 Robinson, Rev. Robert, 64, 102 “Rock of Ages,’’ 82, 102, 127, 128 Rodigast, Samuel, 125 Rogers, Lebbeus Harding, 84 Roosevelt, Theodore, 209 Rossini, Gioachino A., 186 Rothe, Johann A., 123 Rotterdam, 187 Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 174, 198 Russian Hymn, 186, 201 Rutherford, 174, 211 . Athanasius, 182 . Andrew of Crete, 117, 220 . Ann, 52, 176, 201 . George’s, Windsor, 182 . John of Damascus, 117 . John’s, Westminster, 180 . Leonard, 182 . Louis, 192 . Martin’s, 177 . Peter, 171, 201, 203 . Petersburg, 186 . Stephen, 177 . Theodulph, 171 . Theodulph of Orleans, 118 . Theresa, 121 . Thomas, 187 Samson, 197 Sanctus, No. 2, 194 Sankey, Ira D., 191 “Saviour, again to thy dear,’ 75, 105, 229 294 Scheffler, Johann A., 123 Schmolck, B., 124 Schumann, Robert, 173, 198 Scott, Sir Walter, ins, 119, 155 Seriven, Joseph, Seagrave, Hers Robert, 101 Sears, Dr. E. H “See, ‘how great ee 78, 156 Serenity, 179 “Servant of God, well done,’ 68 Service, 195 Sessions, - Seymour, “Shall I, foe iS of feeble man,” “shal man, O pad of light,” 115 Shaw, Leslie M “Shepherd. of teciier youth,” 116 Shortle, 194 Sicilian Mariners, 186 “Silent night,”’ 125, 156, 201 Siloam, 199 Simpson, 197 Simpson, Matthew V., 33, 36 “Since without Thee we do no good,’ 106 oe Henry (Thomas), 181, 20) Smith, Bishop Charles W., 31 Smith’ Samuel Francis, 108 Smith, Whiteford, 24 Snyder, Dr. Henry N., 37 “Softly now the light of day,” 108 Something for Jesus, 191 “Soon may the last glad song,’ 110 Spagenburg, Augustus G., 123 125 Spitta, Carl J. P., Spohr, 197 8 pobr, Louis, 173, 197 Btnindr, Sir John, 182, 198, 207 “Stand up, stand up for Jesus!” 1 Stanley, Dean Arthur P., 78, 104, 119 Stebbins, George Coles, 191 Steele, Anna, 66 Stennett, Rev. Jose h, 102 Stennett, Rev. Dr. amuel, 102 INDEX Stephen, the Sabaite, 117 Stephanos, 183 Sternhold and Hopkins, 114 Stevenson, Rev. Dr. G. J., 83, 86 Stewart, Sir Robert Pe, 178 “Still, still with Thee,” 111 Stockton, Rev. J. H., 106, 191 Stowe, Mrs. Harriet B., 111 Stratton, Mrs. F. K., 112 “Strong Son of God, immortal Love,” 106 Stryker, Rev. Dr. M. W. 109 Stuart, Rev. Dr. C. M., 8, 32, 39, 209, 230 Sullivan, Sir Arthur, 52, 181, 182, 212 Summers, Thomas O., 23, 24, 25 ‘Sun of my soul, thou Saviour,” 103, 184 “Sunset and evening star,’’ 106 ‘Sweet hour of prayer,” 70, 164, 190, 205 “Take my life and let it be,” 63, 126 as Thomas, 174, 175 ‘appan, 189 Tate and Brady, 114, 116 Taylor, Rev. Thomas B., 67 eo me, my God and King,” Tell it out among the heathen,” 67 “Tell me the old, old story,” 66 Tennyson, Alfred, Lord, 106 Tersteegen, Gerhard, 124 Teschner, Melchior, 171 Thatcher, 197 a church’s one foundation,” 126 ‘The day of resurrection,” 117 “The day of wrath,” 106, 119 “The God of Abraham praise,” 101, 113, 223, 252 “The King of lovemy Shepherd,”’ 83, 127, 163 The Lord Pies You and Keep You, 1 The Lord descended from above,” 114 INDEX “The Lord will come and not be slow,” 97 “The puemaing light is breaking,’ “The ape world by Adam trod,” 75— The seid ‘Rock, 190 i spacious ‘firmament, ” 97, 6 “There is a fountain filled,” 80, 99 ae is a land of pure delight,” eee a song in the air,” 47, 0 aes a wideness in,” 54, 104, ‘They who seek the ferent: ” 187 “Thou art the Way. “Thou hidden ive, of God, ” 124 ‘Thou, whose unmeasured tem- ple,” Thring, Rev. Godfrey, 105, 208 Through the night of doubt,” 113 Tillett, Rev. Dr. Wilbur Fisk, 8, 37, 40 “To Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,” 114 “To God on high be thanks,” 122 To thee, Eternal Soul, be praise,” 133 Tomer, William G., 191 Toplady, 188 Toplady, Rev. Augustus M., 102, 124, 133 Tourjée, Eben, a Tourjée, Lizzie § . (Mrs. Esta- brook), 192 Tours, Berthold, 187, 213 True-Hearted, Whole-Hearted, 191 Truro, 177 Turle, James, 180 Upham, Rev. Dr. 8. F., 31, 210 Van Alstyne, Mrs. Francis J. (see “Fanny Crosby’’) Vigil, 186, 207 295 Vokes, Mrs., 110 Vox Dilecti, 207, 220 Walford, William W., 70 Wallace, William V., 178 Walter, William Henry, 192 Waratah, 196 Waring, 197 Warne, Miss Anna Letitia, 111 Warren, George W., 192 Warren, Rev. Dr. William F., 109, 131 Washington, 194, 204, 214 “Watchman, tell us,” 159 Wathall, Alfred G., 193 Watts, Isaac, 16, 72, "76, 79, 81, 87, 97, 98, 115, 116, 129, 136, 153 “We may not climb the heav- enly,” 107 “We plow the fields and,” 125 Webb, 199 Webb, George J., 199 Webbe, Samuel, 174, 199 Weber, Carl M. von, 173, 198 Webster, Rev. Dr. Lorin, 195 “Weep not for a brother,” 54, 147 “Welcome, 226, 232 “Welcome, happy morning,” 82 eon sweet day of rest,” 86 Wellesley, 192 Wesley, Charles, 16, 47, 53, 61, 62, 68, 69, 73, 7, 78, 79, 99, 100, 115, 116, 131, 134, 135, 136, 137, 153, 156, 160, 180, 185, 206, 207, 222 Wesley, John, 15, 17, 22, 53, 61, 63, 81, 82, 85, 89, 99, 100, 102; 113, 123, 124, 133, 136, 138, 215, 236, Wesley, Rev. Samuel, 85, 100 Wey: Samuel Sebastian, 180, 20: West, Robert A., 27 Westminster, 180 ‘‘What a friend we have,” 191 delightful morn,” 72, 296 ‘What though my flesh and heart,” 82 eee my God ordains,” ‘When all thy mercies, O my God,” 97 ‘When gathering clouds,” 127 ‘*When I survey the wondrous,” 85, 98, 224 ‘*When Israel, of the Lord be- loved,” 105 §$When marshaled on the night- , 60 ; When morning gilds the skies,” 125 ‘tWhile life prolongs its pre- cious,” 115 , {While shepherds their,” 116 ''While thee I seek, protect- ing,” 72 Whisner, Rev. Peter H., 35, 36 White, Henry Kirke, 60, 254 Whitehead, Rev. Dr. Paul, 37 Whittier, John G., 107 ‘Who are these arrayed in white?” 68 fSWhy should the children of'a King,” 89 watched INDEX Wightman, William M., 23, 24 Williams, Aaron, 187 Williams, Helen Maria, 72 Williams, Rev. William, 101 Willis, Nathaniel P., 75, 107, 158 Willis, Richard Storrs, 107 Wilson, 197 Winchester, Dr. Caleb T., 32, 41, 106, 109, 144, 213 Winchester Old, 176, 242 Winkler, John J., 123 Winkworth, Catherine, 124 Winton, Rev. George B., 36 Wolcott, Dr. Samuel, 76 Woodbury, Isaac Baker, 199 Woodworth, 190, 231 Woodland, 188 Wenjevent, Rev. Christopher, 104 “Workman of God! O lose not heart,” 151 Wreford, Rev. John R., 75 8, Xavier, Saint Francis, 149 Zinzendorf, Count N. L., 62, 123, 124 Zion, 188 oF Rrra are Saree cae See epee Ee Re eee etree eats Retro ener arte state eT eta oa I sea eT SESS ee Se Sos eet Sietnpee toate