ew Bese ye aan ee Taian Soe “ is 2 ar oye Se ale * eae x cow ee he eee ; ‘oman (La Femme) DATE DUE OLIN VWotlo Moa VAGO W OMAN UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME, And by the same Author, LOVE (L’AMOU R). One Vol., 12mo. Muslin. Price $1 00. WOMAN (La Fenrwe.) From the French of M. J. MICHELET, OF THE FACULTY OF LETTERS, CHIEF IN THE HISTORICAL SECTION OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES, AUTHOR OF “A HISTORY OF FRANCE,” “HISTORY OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIO,” “ MEMOIRS OF LUTHER,” “INTRODUCTION TO UNIVERSAL HISTORY,” “LWINBECTE,” “L'OISEAU,” “L'AMOUR,” ETO., ETO,, ETC. Translated from the last Paris Edition, by J. W. Pautmer, M.D. Author of “ The New and the @lv,” “Ap and Down the Errawaddi,” ete. LS ; VWNtE Edgy Way Wy ity, (28 ely Pia 6 wt Bot oat ot NEW YORK: Rupp & CarLetTon, 130 GRanp STREET, PARIS: L. HACHETTE ET Cie, M DCCC LX. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by RUDD & CARLETON, in the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. B. ORAIGHEAD, Stereotyper and Electrotyper, Carton Building, 81, 83, and 85 Centre Street, ¥ ‘TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE. IN THE AUTHOR'S OWN WORDS. “Tats book omits two subjects, the introduction of which in L’ Amour has been so much censured—adultery and pros- titution. I concluded to leave.their discussion to the litera- ture of the day—which is inexhaustible on both those themes. I have demonstrated my problems by straight lines, and left to other writers the complicated illustration by curves. In their books they elaborately pursue the by- paths of love, but never once strike out on its grand and fertile highway—that impregnation which in more elevated passions endures even unto death. Our clever novelists are in the identical fog that in former times enyeloped the casuists, who were, moreover, great analysers. Escobar and Busenbaum, who met with the same success as Balzac— fifty editions each, of their works—forgot only one thing in their subtile researches; but that was the very founda- tion of their doctrine. So the writers of to-day lose sight of marriage, and lay down rules for libertinism. VI Preface. “This book differs no less from the serious romances of our great Utopians—Saint-Simon, Fourier, and the rest. They invoke nature, but a very low order of it, in sympa- thy with the degradation of the times; and at once they put their trust in passional attraction, in our very inclina- tion towards that debased nature. In this age of stupen- dous effort, of heroic creation, they have tried to suppress effort; but with such a being as man, an energetic creator, an artist, effort is part of himself, and he is all the better for it. The popular moral instinct perceives this, and that is why those great thinkers have not succeeded in founding aschool. Art, labor, and effort rule us all, and what we call nature in ourselves is, most frequently, of our own making, for we create ourselves day by day. I felt the truth of this while pursuing my anatomical studies last year, especially on the brain. The brain is manifestly the organ of work, the incarnation of our daily life. Hence its intense expression, and, if I may so say, its eloquence, in superior individuals; Ido not hesitate to call it the most perfect flower, the most touching beauty in nature—affecting in the child, and often sublime in the man. Let them call this Realism; I am quite indifferent. There are two sorts of realism: the one vulgar and vacant—the other, through the Real, attaining the Idea, which is its essence and its highest truth, consequently its inherent nobility. If pru- dery is “shocked” at my poetry of truth, the only pure poetry, it is of no consequence to me; when in L'Amour I broke down the stupid barrier which separates literature from the enlightenment of science, I did not ask the advice Preface. vil of those shame-faces, who would be chaster than Nature, and purer than God. “Woman needs a faith, and: expects it from man, in or- der to bring up her child; for there can be no education without faith. The day has come.when faith may be laid down in a formula. Roussean could not do it; his age was not ripe for it. Conscience is the test of truth; but it must have two controlling influences—history, which is the con- science of the human race, and natural history, which is the instinctive conscience of nature. Now formerly neither of these two existed; they have been born within the last cen- tury (1760-1860). “When Conscience, History, and Natural History accord —Believe!” [Conrenrs. eS PAGE TRANSLATOR'’S PREFAOE, . : s 8 . rs a . . v Srdroduction, I.—Why People do not Marry, : s . ‘ . . - 12 II.—The Female Operative, . . . . * . . - 28 IIL—The Woman of Letters, . 4 ‘ : . ‘ . 31 IV.—No Life for Woman without Man, . . 5 ‘ 5 - 42 Burt Firat, EDUCATION. L—Sun, Air, andLight, . . . . 2. « « «© BB IL—tThe first Exchange of Glances, and the Beginnings of Faith, . 57 IiI.—Play.—The child Teaching its Mother, . . + - 61 IV.—The Frail and Sacred Child, . . 2 : A , . 67 x Contents. V.—Love at Five Years—The Doll, . .« . + VI.—Woman a Religion, . 5 a) ‘ 7 5 VIL—Love at Ten Years.—Flowers, “ . . . VUL—The Little Household.—The Little Garden, . . IX.—The Maternities of Fourteen.—The Metamorphosis, X.—History as a Basis of Faith, . . ‘. . XI.—Pallas.—Reason, . ‘ . ‘ . . . XII.—Andrea del Sarto’s ‘ Charity,” 4 . . . XI11.—The Revelation of Heroism, . . . é . Book Secoud. WOMAN IN THE FAMILY.‘ L—The Woman who will Love most.—Of a Different Race, . 7 II.—The Woman who will Love most.—Of the Same Race, . a IIT.—The Man who will Love best, . 5 . . . IV.—The Proof, . 7 : : ‘ . 3 . ‘V.—How She gives her Heart away, . . . . VI.—Thou shalt leave thy Father and thy Mother, . . VIL—The Young Wife.—Her Solitary Thoughts, . . VITII.—She would be his Partner and his Client, : . IX.—Arts and Reading.—The Common Faith, . . X.—The great Legend of Africa—Woman the Goddess ness, . . . : 7 7 . - XI.—How Woman Excels Man, . « . ‘ . XIL.—The Humiliations of Love.—Confession, . 3 . XIIL.—The Communion of Love, 7 : ° ; . XIV.—The Offices of Nature, . « . . 7 . of Good- PAGE 92 6 85 93 98 103 113 117 123 131 138 146 152 158 165 173 180 186 192 200 208 215 222 Contents. Xi Book Third, WOMAN IN SOOIETY. PAGE I.—Woman an Angel of Peace and Civilization, . . : - 230 IL.—Last Love-—Womzen’s Friendships, . : : 5 3 + 234 III.—Woman Protecting Woman.—Caroline Chisholm, . . 241 IV.—Consolation for Imprisoned Women, ee dh 4h : . 247 V.—The Healing Art inWoman, 7 : . . 2 . 254 Vi—tThe Simples, . - 5 ‘ 2 3 7 5 7 ~ 262 VIL—Children—Light—the Future, . =... we 268 NOTES, © - ee ee ee ww ee at INTRODUCTION. I. WHY PEOPLE DO NOT MARRY. We all perceive the capital fact of our time. From a sin- gular combination of circumstances—social, religious, and economical—Man lives apart from Woman. And this is be- coming more and more common. They are not merely in dif- ferent and parallel paths; they are as two travellers, starting from the same point, one at full speed, the other at a sluggish pace, but following divergent routes. Man, however weak he may be morally, is nevertheless on a train of ideas, inventions, and discoveries, so rapid that sparks dart from the burning rail. Woman, hopelessly left behind, remains in the rut of a past of which she herself knows but little. She is distanced, to our sorrow, but either will not or cannot go faster. The worst of it is that they do not seem to desire to come together. They seem to have nothing to say to each other— a cold hearth, a silent table, a frozen couch. “One is not bound,” they say, “to put himself out in his own family.” But they do no better in society, where polite- 14 Why People do not Marry. ness commands it. Every one knows how a parlor divides itself in the evening into two parlors, one of men, and one of women. It has not been much noticed, but it. may be tested, that in a friendly reunion of a dozen persons, if the hostess insists with a sort of gentle violence that the two circles mingle together and the men converse with the women, silence succeeds; there is no more conversation. We must state the thing precisely as it is: they have no longer any ideas in common, any language in common, and even as to what might interest both parties they do not know how to speak, they have too completely lost sight of each other. Soon, if we do not take care, in spite of casual meet- ings, there will no longer be two sexes but two peoples. It is not surprising that the book which comhbated these tendencies—a little book of the heart, without literary preten- sion, has been on all sides sharply criticised. “ Z’Amour,” threw itself naively into the breach, invoked good-nature, and said “ Love again.” At these words sharp cries were uttered ; for the diseased core was touched. “No, we will not love, we will not be happy. There is something under all this. Under that reli- gious form which deifies woman, he attempts to strengthen, to emancipate her mind. He seeks for a servile idol, to bind on his altar.” Thus, at the word Union, broke forth all the evils of the time—division, dissolution, the sad solitary tastes, the desire for’savage life, which brood in the depths of men’s minds. The women read and wept. Their directors (priests or philosophers, no matter which) dictated language to them. Searcely did they dare feebly to defend their defender. But they did better, they read over again, they devoured, the for- pidden book, they kept it for their leisure hours, and hid it ‘under their pillows. Why People do not Marry. 15 It is well consoled by that, this much-abused book, both for the insults of enemies and the censures of friends. Neither the men of the Middle Ages nor those of Free Love found their account in it. Z’Amour sought to lead woman back to the fireside; they preferred the pavement or the convent for her. “A book about marriage, for the family? Scandalous! ‘Rather write thirty romances about adultery—something imaginative, something amusing. You will be much better received.” “ Why fortify the family?” says a religious journal. ‘“Isn’t it perfect already? Formerly there was something they called adultery, but that is no longer to be seen.” “Excuse us,” replies a great political thunderer, in a brilliant and extremely effective feuilleton, “we beg your pardon,—it is still to be seen, and everywhere; but there is so little passion in it that it disturbs no one’s comfort; it is a thing inherent‘in French matriages, and almost an institution. Every nation has its own morals, and we are not English.” Comfort! yes, that is the evil. Neither the husband nor the lover is troubled by it—nor the wife either; she wishes to get rid of ennui, that is all. But in this lukewarm, blood- less life, in which we invest so little heart, expend so little art, in which not one of the three deigns to make an effort of any sort, everybody languishes, yawns, palls with nauseating comfortableness. We all understand that well, and no one is in a hurry to be married. If our laws of succession did not make women rich, there would be no more marrying, at least not in the: large towns. In the country I heard a married man, father of a 16. Why People do not Marry. family, 2 man ‘well posted,’ indoctrinating a young neigh- bor of his: “If you are to stay here,” he said, “you will have to marry; but if you live in Paris, it is not worth the trouble, you can dispense with it easily.” We all know the saying which marked the fall of the world’s most intellectual people, the Athenians: “ Ah, if we could have children without women.” It was much worse under the Empire. All the legal penalties, those Julian laws which made a man marry @ coup de baton, were unsuccessful in bringing man and woman together, and it seemed that even the physical passion—that fine necessity which spurs the world along and centuples its energies—was extinguished here below. So that, never again to see a woman, men fled even into the Thebais. The motives which now-a-days not only cause marriage to be feared; but estrange women from society, are various and complicated. The first, indisputably, is the increasing misery of poor girls, putting them at the mercy of the world—the easy appropriation of those victims of hunger. Hence satiety and enervation, forgetfulness of any higher love, and mortal ennui at having to solicit tediously what may be had so easily every evening. Even he who has other needs, and a taste for fidelity, who would like to love with a single intensity, infinitely prefers a dependent, gentle, obedient person, who thinks of no rights of her own, and who, if left to-morrow, will not move a step—only wishing to please. The strong and brilliant personality of our girls, which too often asserts itself the very day after the wedding, frightens the celibate. There isno joke in that—the French woman is a character. It affords a chance for immense happiness— but sometimes for unhappiness also. Our excellent civil laws (which are of the future, and to- Why People do not Marry. 17 ward which the world is gravitating) have none the less added to the inherent difficulties of the national character. The French woman is an heir, and she knows it,—has a dowry, and she knows it. It is not asin some other countries, where a daughter, if she has any dowry, has it only in money (a fluid which easily runs out in the business of the husband). Here she has real estate, and even if her own brother should desire to purchase it, the law opposes bim, and keeps her rich in fixtures, secured by the dotal code or by certain stipulations. Such fortunes are almost always enduring. Land does not take wings, houses do not crumble; they remain to afford her a voice in the matter, a personality scarcely ever possessed by the English or the German woman. The latter, so to speak, are absorbed in the husband; they sink into him body and property (if they have any property) ; so that they are, I believe, more completely than our women uprooted from their native family, which would not receive them again. The wife is reckoned as dead by her own people, who rejoice in establishing a daughter so as never again to have expenses on her account. Whatever may happen, and’ wherever her husband may choose to take her, she will go and remain. On such conditions marriage is less formidable to the men. A curious thing in France, contradictory in appearance but not in reality, is that marriage is very weak, and the esprit de famille very strong. It happens (especially in the provinces, among the rural bourgeoisie), that the wife who has been some time married, as soon as she has children divides her soul in two parts, one for her children, the other for her rela- tives, for her reawakened first affections. What protection, in that case, for the husband? None, the esprit de famille an- nuls the marriage. One can hardly imagine how wearisome is such a wife, bury- ing herself in a retrograde past, letting herself down to the 18 Why People do not Marry. level of a superannuated but lively mother, all imbued with old ‘things. The husband lives on quietly, but soon sickens of it— discouraged, weary, good for nothing. He loses the ideas and hopes of progress he had acquired in his studies and in youthful society. He is soon killed off by the proprietor, by the dull stifling of that old family hearth. Thus under a dowry of a hundred thousand franes is buried a man who might perhaps have earned as much every year. So says the young man to himself in his time of aspiration and of confidence. But whether he have more or less, no mat- ter; if he would take his chance, know what he is capable of, he will send the dowry to the devil. For the sake of the little thing that beats under his left breast, he will not, for five hun- dred francs, become husband to the queen. Bachelors have often told me this. They have also told me another thing; one evening when I had five or six at my house, men of mark, as I was bantering them about their pretended celibacy, one of them, a distinguished savant, uttered these very words to me, and quite seriously: “Never believe that, whatever diversions a man may find without it, he is not unfortunate in having no fireside—I mean a wife who is truly his own. We all know that, we feel it. There is no other repose for the heart; and not to have a wife, sir, be sure is a sombre, cruel, bitter life.” Bitter! on that word all the others also laid stress, and spoke as he did. “ But,” said he, “one consideration deters us. All who work in France are poor. We live by our engagements, by our patronage. We live honestly, I earn six thousand francs; but the wife I should choose would spend that much on her toilet. Their mothers educate them so. Suppose one of these beautiful creatures were bestowed on me, what would become of me the next day, as she left her rieh abode to find mine go Why People do not Marry. 19 poor. If loved her (and Iam quite capable of that), imagine the misery, the wickedness into which I might be tempted, to become a little richer, and so displease her a little less. “T shall always remember how being once in a small town of the South, to which it was the fashion to send sick people, I saw a startling apparition pass by a place where the mules were winding along in a cloud of dust. It was a very beau- tiful woman, clothed like a courtesan—a woman, not a girl— twenty-five years old, puffed out, ‘distended in a fresh and charming silk robe of blue, clouded with white (a master-piece of Lyons), which she dragged abominably through the dirt- iest spots. She seemed not to rest on the earth. Her blonde and pretty head tossed back her jaunty Amazonian hat, which gave her the air of a piquant young page, her whole appearance said, ‘I jest at everything.” I felt that this idol, monstrously in love with herself, for all her pride, belonged, from first to last, to those who flattered her, that they mocked her, and that she did not even know what a scruple was. I called Solomon to mind. ‘ Ht tergens os suum dixit: non sum operata malum? This vision remained with me. It was not a person, it was not a thing, but it was the fashion, and the manners of the time, I saw; it will always inspire me with a true terror of marriage.” “ As for me,” said a younger bachelor, “the obstacle, the insuperable scruple, is not crinoline, but religion.” We laughed: but he, becoming animated, protested ; “Yes, religion. Women are educated in dogmas which are not ours. Mothers who are so desirous to have their daugh- ters married, give them an education exactly calculated to produce divorce. “What are the dogmas of France? If France herself does not know, Europe does very well; its hatred perfectly reverls them. An enemy, a very retrograding foreigner, w 20 Why People do not Marry. once described them to me thus: ‘ What renders your France hateful to us, he said, ‘is that beneath its apparent muta- tions it never changes.’ It is like a lighthoise in eclipse, with revolving lights. It shows or conceals the flame, but the focus is always the same. What focus? The wit of Voltaire (long previous to Voltaire) ; in the second place (’89), the grand laws of the Revolution; and in the third place, the canons of your scientific pope, the Academy of Sciences.’ “J disputed it. He insisted; and I now see that he was right. Yes, whatever new questions may arise, ’89 is the faith even of those who postpone ’89, and refer it to the future. It is the faith of all France, and that is why foreigners condemn us altogether, and without distinction of parties. “Well, the daughters of France are carefully educated to hate and contemn what all France loves and believesin. Thrice they have embraced, weakened, killed the Revolution; first, in the sixteenth century, in the matter of liberty of con- science; then, at the end of the eighteenth, in the question of political liberty. They have devoted themselves to the past, not knowing what indeed that is. They like to listen to those who say with Pascal: ‘ Nothing is sure; therefore, believe in the absurd.’ Women are rich in France; they have much wit, and every means of instruction. But they will not learn anything, nor create a faith for themselves. Let them meet a man of serious faith, a man of heart, who believes and loves established truths, and they say with a smile: ‘That man doesn’t believe in anything.’ ” There was a momentary pause. This rather violent sally had nevertheless, I perceived, won the assent of all present. I said to them: “If what you have just advanced be admit- ted, I believe we must say it has been often just the same in other ages, and people have married, nevertheless. Women loved dress and luxury, and were conservative, but the men Why People do not Marry. 21 of those times were doubtless more daring; they faced those perils, hoping that their influence, their energy, above all their love, the master and conqueror of conquerors, would effect happy changes in their favor. Intrepid Curtii, they threw themselves boldly into the gulf of uncertainties, and very happily for us. For, gentlemen, but for the audacity of our fathers, we had never been born. “ Now, will you permit a friend older than youto speak with frankness? Then I shall venture to tell you that if you were = truly alone, if you endured without consolation the life you find so bitter, you would make haste to change it, you would say: Love is strong and can do whatever it will. The greater will be the glory of converting these absurd and charming beauties to reason. With a great, resolute, and persevering purpose, well-chosen means, and skilfully calculated circum- stances, one may do much. But it is necessary to love, to love intensely, and love a single object. No coldness. The cultivated and coveted woman infallibly belongs to the man. If the man of this age complains that he does not reach her soul, it is because he has not what subdues the soul, viz. con- centrated strength of desire. “ Now, to speak only of the obstacle first alleged, of the unrestrained pride of women, their madness for the toilet, etc. : it seems to me that this applies especially to the upper classes, to rich ladies, or to those who mingle with wealthy people. There are two or three hundred thousand of these. But do you know how many women there are in France? Eighteen millions, and eighteen hundred thousand marriageable. “It would be great injustice to accuse them all of the wrongs and follies of ‘ our best society. If they imitate it at a dis- tance, it is not always from choice. Ladies, by their example, often by their contempt or their ridicule, cause great misfortunes in this way. They impose an impossible luxury 22 Why People do not Marry. on poor creatures who sometimes would not care for it, but who by their position, involving serious interests, are forced to be brilliant ; and to be so, they plunge into great extravagance. “Women who have their own peculiar world and so many secrets in common, ought certainly to love each other a little, and sustain each other, instead of warring among themselves. They inflict mutual injury, in a thousand cases, indirectly. The wealthy dame whose luxury changes the costume of the ‘poor girl, does the latter a great wrong—she prevents her marriage; for no workman cares to marry a doll, so expen- sive to dress. If she remains a maiden, she is, perhaps, an office or a shop girl, but even in that capacity the lady still harms her; she prefers to deal with a clerk, in a black coat, a flatterer, and finds him more womanly than the woman. The shopkeepers have thus been led to substitute, at great ex- pense, the clerk for the girl, who cost much less. “What will become of her? If she is pretty, twenty years of age, she will be ‘protected,’ and will pass from hand to hand. Soon fading, before thirty, she will become a seam- stress, and work for her ten sous a day. She has no means of living save by earning her bread every night in shame. Thus the woman of wealth, depreciating her own sex, goes on mak- ing celibacy more and more economical, and marriage unpro- fitable, until, by a terrible retribution, her own daughter will never be able to marry. * “Do you wish me, gentlemen, to briefly portray the lot of woman in France? No one has yet done it with sim- plicity. This picture, if I do not deceive myself, will touch your hearts, and perhaps enlighten you, and will prevent you from confounding very different classes in the same ana- thema.” The Female Operative. 23 II. THE FEMALE OPERATIVE. WaEn the English manufacturers, enormously enriched by new machinery, complained to Pitt, saying: “We cannot go on, we do not make money enough,” he gave them a terrible answer, a stain on his memory: “ Take the children.” How much more guilty are those who took women, who opened to the wretchedness of the city girl, to the blindness of the peasant, the fatal resource of an exterminating labor, and the promiscuity of factories! He who takes the woman, takes also the child; for in every one that perishes, a family is destroyed, many children, and the hope of generations to come. Barbarism of our West! Woman is no longer esteemed for the love and happiness of man, still less for maternity and the power of reproduction—but as an operative. Operative! an impious, sordid word, which no language ever had, which no period could have ever understood before this iron age, and which alone would counterbalance all our pretended progress. “ Here comes the close band of economists, doctors of the net proceeds. “ But, sir,” they say, “the high economic and social necessities! Industry would be obstructed, stopped. In the name of these same poor classes,” etc., etc. The first necessity is to live, and palpably, we are perishing. The population no longer increases, and its quality is degene- rating. The peasant girl dies of labor, the female operative of hunger. What children can we expect from them? Abor- tions, more and more. “« But a people does not perish!” Many peoples, even of those which still figure on the map, no longer exist. The Scottish Highlanders have disappeared. Ireland no longer presents a race. Wealthy, absorbing England, that prodi- zt 24. The Female Operative. gious blood-sucker of the world, does not succeed in renew- ing itself by the most. enormous alimentation. The race is changing and growing weak there, has recourse to stimu- lants, to alcohol, and is more and more enfeebled. Those who saw it in 1815 did not, recognise it in 1830, and how much less to-day ! « What can the State do for this? Very little in England, where the industrial life swallows up everything, the whole country being now but one factory. But an infinite good in France, where we as yet have so few laborers, comparatively. How many things that were impossible, have nevertheless . been done! It’ was impossible to abolish lotteries; they are abolished. We would have sworn it was impossible to demolish Paris int order to re-build it: ‘but that was easily done by a brief clause in the code (Appropriation for Public Improvements). g ° I see two peoples in our cities: The one dressed in woollen—that is man,—the other in wretched cotton, and that too, even in winter, By the former I mean the lowest operative, the least paid bungler—a servant of operatives. This man, however, eats meat in the morning (a Bologna sausage, or something else). In the evening he enters a cookshop, and has a dish of meat, and even drinks some bad wine. The woman of the same condition takes a sou’s worth of milk in the morning, some bread at noon, and some bread at night, and very rarely a bit of cheese. Do you deny-that? It is certain ; I will prove it presently. Her day’s income is ten sous, and cannot be eleven, for a reason which I will ‘explain. Why is it so? The man no longer wishes to marry, no longer wishes to protect the woman. He lives greedily alone. Can it be said that he leads an abstinent life? No. He The Female Operative. ag deprives himself of nothing. Besotted on Sunday night, he will find without seeking some hungry shadow of a wo- man, and will outrage the dead creature. One blushes at being a man. “] make too little money,” says he; four or five times more than the woman, in most trades. He earns forty or fifty sous, and she ten, as we shall see. The poverty of the male operative would be wealth, abun- dance, luxury, to the female. The former complains much the more; and, as sogn as he is” in want at all, he wants many more things. We may say of them what has been said of the Englishman and the Irishman : “The Irishman is hungry for potatoes, the Englishman is hungry for meats, sugar, tea, beer, liquors, etc.” In the budget of the workman’s necessities I have over- looked two things in which he indulges at any price, and of which the workwoman never thinks: tobacco and beer. In most cases these two articles absorb more money than a family. The pay of the men has, I know, sustained a rude shock, chiefly from the effect of the precious metal crisis, which changed the value of silver. Their wages will rise again, but slowly ; time is needed to restore the equilibrium. But, allow- ing for this, the difference still exists; the woman is much the more affected. It is meats and wine that he must give up: with her, it is bread itself. She cannot economize; one step lower, and she dies. - “Tt is their own fault,” says the economist. “Why are they so mad as to leave their fields, and come to die of hunger in towns? If it is not the workwoman herself, it was her 2 26 The Female Operative. mother who came, and instead of a peasant became a domes- tic. She did not fail, though unmarried, to have a child, which child is the operative.” ‘ My dear Sir, do you know what country life is in France— How terrible, excessive, severe the labor is? Women do not till in England; they are very miserable, but yet they have sheds to protect them from the wind and rain. Germany, with its forests and its prairies, with its very slow labor, and national gentleness, does not crush out woman as wedo. The durus arator. of the poet has his reality scarcely anywhere but here. Why? He is a proprietor—proprietor of little or nothing, and in debt. By a furious, blind labor, and ‘unskilful agriculture, he struggles with the vulture; the land threatens to escape from him. Rather than that should happen, he will bury himself in it, if need be; but, first, cer- tainly, his wife. It is for this that he marries, in order to have a workman; in the Antilles, they buy a negro; in France, we marry a wife. She is preferred who has a small appetite, a lithe and slen- der figure—from an idea that she will eat less (a historic fact). She has a great heart, this poor French woman, and does as much or more than is required. She drives the ass (in light soils), and the man holds the plough. In any case, she has the hardest part. He prunes the vine at his ease—she scrapes and digs. He has respites—she none. He has festive occa- sions and friends. He goes alone to the tavern—she goes for a moment to church, and there falls asleep. If he returns at night intoxicated, she is beaten, and often, which is worst, when she is encetnte. Then she endures for a year her double suffering, in heat and cold, chilled by the wind, drenched by the rain, daily. Most of them die of consumption, especially in the north (see the statistics). No constitution can withstand their mode The Female Operative. 27 of life. Then forgive the mother if she desires her daughter to suffer less, if she sends her to the factory, there at least she will have a roof over her head; or makes her a domestic in town, where she will partake of the amenities of the bowr- geoisie. The girl is only too eage? for that; every woman has in fancy little needs of elegance, finery, and aristocracy. She is at once punished for it. She no longer sees the sun, Her mistress is often very hard, especially if the girl be pretty. She is immolated to spoiled children, vicious monkeys, and cruel little cats, who make her their plaything; or else she is blamed, scolded, teased, abused. Then she would be glad to die, home-sickness takes possession of her; but she knows that her father would never receive her. She grows pale and wastes away. Only the master is good to her. He would console her if he dared. He clearly sees that in her desolate state, in which she, has never a word of kindness, the little one is in the power of any one who will evince the least friendship for her. The opportunity soon arrives, madame being in the country. The resistance is not great; he is her master, and he is strong. ‘She is enceinte, and a great storm follows. The husband, ashamed, shrugs his shoulders. She is driven out of doors, and without bread, lives in the streets till she can go to the hospital for her accouchement. (This is the almost invariable story. See the confessions noted by physicians.) What will be her life, great God, what struggles, what difficulties, if she has so good a heart, so much courage, as to wish to rear her child! a Let us notice the condition of woman thus burdened, in circumstances comparatively favorable. A young Protestant widow, of very: austere morals, laborious, economical, temperate, exemplary in every sense, agréeable also, in spite of all she has suffered, lives behind the Hotel- 28 The Female Operative. Dieu, in an unhealthy street, lower than the wharf. She has a sickly child, who is always trying to go to school, always falling ill, and cannot get on. Her rent is raised, less than many others, from one hundred and twenty to one hundred and sixty francs. She said to two excellent ladies, “ When I can go out by the day, they will give me twenty sous, even twenty- five; but that happens scarcely more than two or three times a week. If you had not had the goodness to aid me with my rent, by giving me five francs a month, I must have done like the others, and, to support my child, have walked the streets in the evening.” The poor woman who thus walks the streets trembling, alas! to offer herself up, is immeasurably above the coarse man, whom she must address. Our work-women who have so mucb wit, taste, and tact, are usually physically favored, graceful, and delicate. What is the difference between them and the ladies of the higher classes? The foot? No. The figure? No. The hand alone constitutes the difference, be- cause the poor operative, forced to wash often, passing the winter in her little room with a simple foot-stove, has her hands, her only means of labor and of life, swollen grievously, bursting with chilblains. With almost only that exception the same woman, if a little dressed, is Madame la Comtesse, as much as any in the grand Faubourg. She has not the jargon of the world; she is much more romantic, more lively. Let but a gleam of happiness fall on her, and she will eclipse them all. We do not sufficiently remark what an aristocracy women form; there is no populace among them. As I was driving down the street, a young woman with a gentle, feminine countenance, worn, but delicate, pretty, and distinguished, followed the carriage addressing me in vain, for I did not understand English. Her beautiful supplicating blee eyes seemed profoundly sorrowful under her little straw hat. The Female Operative. 29, “Sir,” said I to my neighbor, who understood French, “can you tell me what that charming person is saying to me, she who has the air of a duchess, and who for some reason persists in following the carriage.” “Sir,” said he, politely, “T am inclined to believe that she is an operative without work, who is begging in violation of the law.” Two important events have changed the lot of woman in Europe, in these latter years. She has only two great trades, spinning and sewing. The others (embroidery, flowers, etc.) scarcely deserve to be counted. Woman is a spinner, woman is a seamstress. It has been her business in all times: it is her universal history. Well, it is no longer so; it has just been changed. The loom has suppressed the spinner. It is not only her earnings, but a whole world of habits that she has lost. The peasant used to spin as she watched her children and fire; she spun in the watches of the night; she spun as she walked, driving her cow or her sheep. The seamstress was the operative of towns; she wrought at home, either continuously, the livelong day, or divided the labor with her household cares. For all important purposes, this no longer exists. First, convents and prisons presented a terrible competition to the isolated seamstress; now the sewing-machine comes to annihilate her. The achievements of the two machines, cheapness and good work, will make their products prevail everywhere. There is nothing to be said against them, nothing to be done. Indeed, these great inventions will, in the end, be advantage- ous to the human race; but their effects are cruel in the period of transition. How many women in Europe, and elsewhere, will be de- voured by these two terrible ogres, the brazen spinner and the iron sewer? Millions—but it can never be calculated. 30 The Female Operative. ; The needle-women were so suddenly famished in England, that many societies are occupied in. promoting their emigra- tion to Australia, The sum advanced is seven hundred and twenty francs, but the emigrant can, after the first year, return half of it (Blosseville). In that country, where the males are infinitely the more numerous, she marries without difficulty, fortifying with new families that powerful colony, more stable than the Indian empire. What becomes of ours? They do not make much noise. They do not, like the conspiring and sturdy laborers, masons, carpenters, make a formidable strike, and dictate terms. They die of hunger, and that is all. The fearful mortality of 1854 fell especially on them. Since that time, their condition has been sorely aggravated. Ladies’ gaiters are sewed by machinery. Flower-makers are paid much less. To inform myself on this sad subject, I spoke of it to many persons, especially to my venerable friend and associate, Dr. Villermi and M. de Guerry, whose excellent works are so highly esteemed, and to a young statistician whose vigorous method I had much admired, Dr. Bertillon. He had the extreme kindness to make a serious task of it, combifing with the data furnished by the laboring classes, others communi- cated by public officers. I wish he would complete and pub- lish it. I will give but one line of his statement: “In the great trade which occupies all women (except a very few), needlework, they can earn but ten sous a day.” Why? “Because machinery, which is still dear enough, does the labor for ten sous, If the woman demanded eleven, the machine would be preferred.” And how does she make up the loss? “She walks the street at night.” That is why the number of filles publiques, registered and numbered, does not increase in Paris, and, I believe, diminishes a little. The Woman of Letters. 31 Man does not content himself with inventing machines. which suppress the two great trades of woman, he takes pos- session directly of the secondary industries by which she lived, and descends to all the avocations of weakness. Can the woman, at her will, rise to the trades that demand strength, and assume those of men? By no means. The Nonchalant and lazy ladies, buried in divans, may say as much as they like: “Woman is not an invalid.” That which is nothing, when one may be nursed two or three days, becomes overwhelming to her who has no repose, and she becomes ill at once. In fact, woman cannot labor long, either standing or sit- ting. If she is always sitting, the blood rises, the breast is irritated, the stomach embarrassed, the head clogged. If she stands, like the laundress, or the compositor, she has other sanguineous accidents. She can labor long only by vary- ing her position, as she does in her household, going and coming. ' A household she ought to have, she ought to be married. Ill. THE WOMAN OF LETTERS. Tue well-educated girl, as she is called who can teach, be- comes governess in a family, or “ professor” of certain arts— does she fare any better in her business? I wish I could say yes. Those gentle offices do not the less cause her an infini- tude of risks, altogether a troubled life, an abortive and some- times tragical destiny. Everything is difficult for the solitary woman, everything a barrier or a precipice. Fifteen years ago Ireceived a visit from a young and amiable girl, sent by her parents from a provincial place to Paris. She was directed to a friend of her family, who might aid her to 32 The Woman of Letters. gain a livelihood by procuring pupils for her. I expressed my astonishment at their imprudence. Then she told me all. They had sent her into this peril to avoid another; she had at home a lover, entirely worthy, who wished to marry her. He was a most excellent man, a man of talent; but, alas! he was poor. “My parents esteem, love him,” said she, “ but they fear we would die of hunger.” I told her without hesitation: “It is better to die of hun- ger than to run the gauntlet of Paris pavements. I bid you, miss, return—not to-morrow, but to-day—to your parents. Every hour that you remain here you will lose a fortune. Alone, inexperienced, what will become of you?” She followed my advice. Her parents consented, and she was married. Her life was a hard one, full of trials, but ex- emplary and honorable, sharing her time between the care of her children and the intelligent aid she afforded her husband in his labors—I can still see her running in the winter to the libraries, where she took notes for him. With all these mise- ries, and the grief I felt at not being able to help their proud poverty, I never regretted the counsel I gave her. She en- joyed much in her heart, suffered only in her fortune; there was never a happier household. She died, beloved, pure, and respected. The worst destiny for woman is to live alone. Alone! the very word is sad to utter. And how can there be on earth a Lone Woman? What! Are there no more men? Are we in the last days of the world? Does the consummation of all things, the approach of the final judgment, render us so selfish that we shut ourselves up in fear of the future, and in the shame of solitary pleasures ? Werecognise the Lone Woman at the first glance. Take her in her own neighborhood, or anywhere where she is known, The Woman of Letters. a5 and she has the disengaged, free, elegantly lightsome air pe- culiar to the women of France. But in a place where she thinks herself less observed, and lets herself out, what sadness, what visible dejection! I met some of these last winter, still young, but in the decay of their bloom, fallen from the hat to the bonnet, grown a little thin and pale—with ennui and anxiety—with bad and innutritious food, perhaps. To make them again beautiful and charming, a very little would have sufficed: hope, and three months of happiness. What obstacles present themselves to the solitary woman ! She can scarcely go out in the evening; she would be taken for a “girl.” There are a thousand places where only men are seen, and if anything should bring her there, they are surprised, and laugh sillily. For example, suppose she is belated on the skirts of Paris, and hungry, she dare not enter a restaurant. She would cause a sensation, make her- self a sight; every eye would be fixed upon her, and she would hear reckless and unpleasant conjectures. She has a whole league to return, and, having arrived late, kindles her fire, prepares her slight repast. She avoids making a noise, because a curious neighbor—some stupid student, or young clerk, perhaps—might apply his eye to the keyhole, or ab- ruptly enter to offer his services. The vexatious indiscrimi- nateness, or rather the slavishness of our vast and abominable barracks, which we call houses, make her tremble at a thou- sand things, and hesitate at every step. All is embarrassing for her, and free to a man. How cautiously, for example, does she shut herself in, when on Sunday her young and noisy neighbors have what they call a repas de gargons. Let us examine this house. She lives in the fourth story, and makes so little noise that the occupant of the third believed for some time that there was no one above him. He is scarcely less unfortunate than she—a man whom delicate health and a modest income have induced to be idle. Without being old, he has Q* 34 The Woman of Letters. already the prudent habits of a man who is for ever occupied in taking care of himself. A piano which wakes him a little sooner than he would like, has revealed the solitary woman ; then, once, he detected on the stairway a charming woman, rather pale, but of fragile elegance, and his curiosity is aroused, Nothing is easier than to gratify it; the porters are not dumb, and her life is so transparent. Except when she is giving her lessons, she is always at home, and always studying ; she is preparing for examination, preferring to be a governess, in order to have the protection of a family. In fact, they speak so well of her, that he begins to reflect. “ Ah! if I were not poor!” says he. “It is very pleasant to have the society of a pretty woman who understands every- thing; saves you from passing your evenings at the theatre or the café, But when, like me, a man has only ten thousand livres income, he cannot marry.” He then calculates and adds up, but, as usual in such cases, makes the account double, combining the probable expenses of a married man, and those of the bachelor who keeps up the café and the theatre. It was thus that one of my friends, one of the most brilliant journalists of Paris, discovered that to support two, without a domestic, in a tiny house in the suburbs, an income of thirty thousand livres would be necessary. j This lamentable life of honorable solitude and desperate ennui, is that which is led by those wandering shades, called in England members of clubs. The system is beginning also in France. Very well catered to, very well warmed, in splen- did establishments, having at hand all the journals, and choice libraries, living together like well-educated and polished dead men, they progress in spleen, and prepare themselves for suicide. Everything is so well organized that speech is useless; there is no need even of signs. On certain days of the year,.a tailor presents himself and takes measures, without speaking. There is not a woman in the house, nor would they’ go to the houses of women. But once a week a girl will The Woman of Letters. 35 * ‘ bring gloves, and such things, paid for in advance, and noise- lessly depart in five minutes. I have sometimes, in an omnibus, met a young girl, mo- destly attired, always wearing a hat, whose eyes were fixed on a book, and never once raised. Seated close to her, I have observed it without staring. Most frequently, the book was some grammar, or one of those manuals of examination. Little books, thick and com- pact, in which all the sciences are concentrated in a dry, un- digested form, as if they were flint. Nevertheless, she put it all into her stomach, that young victim. Certainly, she was eager to absorb as much as possible. She devoted her days and nights to it, even the moments of repose the omnibus afforded, between the lessons she gave and those she received at the two ends of Paris. That inexorable idea pursued her. She never thought of raising her eyes. Fear of that exami- nation weighed heavily on her. We hardly know how alarmed they are. I have seen some who, for several weeks beforehand, did not sleep, and scarcely breathed, but only wept. We must have compassion. Observe, that in- the present state of our morals, I am a strong partisan of these examinations, which facilitate an honorable existence, somewhat more free. I do not ask that they be simplified, that the field of required studies be narrowed; yet, I would like a different method: in history, for example, a small number of great cardinal facts, with, their circumstances and details, and no tables of contents. I sub- mit this reflection to my learned colleagues and friends, who are the judges in these examinations. I would like, moreover, to see their timidity humored; that _ the examinations should be public only to ladies, and that no men but the relatives of the girls be admitted. It is hard that 36 The Woman of Letters. they should be compelled to submit to such a trial before a curious audience, with a sprinkling of jesting young men. To each, also, should be left the choice of the day for her examination. To many, the trial is terrible, and without this precaution might endanger their lives. Eugene Sue, in a feebly executed romance, but marked by ad- mirable observation (LaGouvernante), presents a true picture of the life of a girl suddenly installed in the house of a stranger, whose children she is to educate. Equal, or superior, by her education, modest in her position and in her character, she is only too interesting. The father is much touched by her; the son declares himself in love; the servants are jealous of the attentions of which she is the object, and scandalize her. But how many things are to be added? How incomplete has Sue left the sad Iliad of what she has to suffer, even the dangers she has to fear? We might cite astonishing, incre- dible facts: here, the passion of the father, rising even to crime, attempting to frighten a virtuous girl, cutting her linen and her dresses, even burning her curtains! There, a corrupt mother, wishing to gain time, and to marry her son as late as poxeible, finds it convenient to amuse and detain him with the ruin of a poor young woman of no consequence, who has neither parents nor protector. She flatters, caresses the credulous girl, and, without appearing to do so, arranges opportunities and contrives accidents. On the other hand, I have sometimes seen the mistress of a house so violent and so jealous, making the life of the unhappy creature so bitter, that from the excess of her sufferings, she justly sought relief under the protection of the husband. To a young soul, proud and pure, and courageous against fate, the temptation is natural to escape from individual dependence by addressing herself to the community, to make the public her protector, and to believe that she can live by The Woman of Letters. 27 the fruits of her own thought. Would that women might here make their revelations; one only, I believe, has ven- tured to do so,—in a very powerful romance, the defect of which is, that it is so short that the situations do not attain their full effect. This book (Une fausse Position) appeared fifteen years ago, and disappeared at once. It is the exact itinerary, the guide-book of a poor literary woman, the sche- dule of the tolls, town-dues, turnpike rates, admission charges, etc., which are demanded of her for the privilege of going anywhere; a record of the churlishness and vexation her resistance causes all about her, so that she is surrounded with obstacles, I might almost say with murderous obstacles. Did you ever see the children in Provence conspire against an insect which they consider dangerous? They arrange straws or dry twigs around it, and then light them, so that to whatever side the poor creature turns, it encounters the flame, is cruelly burned, and falls back ; it repeats this several times, and persists in its efforts with an obstinate courage, but always in vain. It cannot pass that circle of fire. You see the same thing in the theatre. An energetic and beautiful woman, very strong of heart, says to herself: ‘In literature I must submit to the critics, who create public opinion. But on the stage, [am in person before my judge, the public, and I plead my own cause. I do not need that any one should say: ‘She has talent!) But I say: ‘See for yourself! ” ‘ What a terrible mistake! The crowd decides much less by what it sees, than by what somebody affirms to be the judgment of the crowd. The audience may be touched by an actress, but the individual hesitates to say so. Each will wait, fearing the ridicule that attaches to extr avagant enthu- siasm. ‘The authorized censors, those professional jesters, must give the signal for admiration. Then the public breaks out, and dares to admire, overstepping indeed all that the emotion of the individual would have allowed. But merely to reach this day of judgment for which she 38 The Woman of Letters. has everything to fear, how disgraceful the preliminaries ! What interested, suspicious, indelicate men, have the sove- reignty of her fate! By what wire-pulling and what trials have débuts been made successful? How has she conciliated those who intro- duce and recommend her—first, the manager, to whom she is presented; then the popular author, who is to create a réle for her ; and finally, the critics. And I do not allude here to the great organs of the press, which are supposed to have some respect for themselves, but to the most obscure and insignifi- cant. It is enough that some green employé, who passes his life in an office, making pens, has scribbled a few satirical lines,—that a contemptible journal prints them, and distri- butes them between the acts. Animated and encouraged by the first applause, the artiste reappears on the stage, full of hope, but she does not recognise the house. The charm is broken, the audience chilled; they look at each other and smile. I was young when I witnessed a very impressive scene, at the remembrance of which'I am still indignant. I am glad to think that now-a-days things are changed. At the house of one of these terrible critics, with whom I was acquainted, I sawa slight girl enter, very simply clad, with a sweet and winning countenance, but already wearied and a little faded. She said, to the point, that she had come to ask a favor, to beg him at least to tell her why he did not let a day pass without attacking, crushing her. He replied boldly,—not that she performed poorly, but that she was dis- courteous,—that to his first somewhat favorable article, she should have responded by a token of gratitude, a substantial souvenir, ‘Alas! Sir, [am so poor! I earn almost nothing, and I must support my mother.”—“ What of that! take a lover.”—“ But I am not pretty; and, besides, I am so wretched. Only lively women are loved.”—“ No, you cannot make me believe that. You are pretty, Miss, but your temper is bad. You are proud, but that will avail you no- The Woman of Letters. 39 thing. You must do like the others, and take a lover.” He stuck to that. Thave never been able to understand how a man could have the courage to hissa woman. The individual man is per- haps good enough, but they are cruel asa public. This is what sometimes occurs in a provincial town: to force the manager to expend more than he is able; and import the best talent, they every night kill off some unfortunate actress, who, whatever her talent may be, loses her wits before such impla- cable animosity, such a shameful punishment. She wavers, stammers, and knows not what she is saying ; then she weeps and stands mute, with imploring eyes. But still they laugh, and they hiss. So she becomes indignant, and revolts against such barbarism. But then the tempest grows so horrible and ferocious, that she prostrates herself before them, and prays for pardon. Accursed be the man who breaks down a woman, who takes from her her pride, her courage, and her soul! In Une fausse Position this moment is indicated so tragically and truly, that we feel it is nature itself, and taken from the life. Camille, the literary woman, ingeniously surrounded by the circle of fire, having no escape, wished but to die. She is prevented only by an unforeseen chance, an inevitable, imperious chance, still to do something good. Softened by charity, she loses the strength that pride had lent to her despair. A savior comes to her, and she yields. She is humbled, disarmed by the great dilemma that so bothers the mystics: “If vice is a sin, pride is a greater sin.” Suddenly she, who had carried her head so high, becomes good, docile, and obedient. She makes the woman’s confession: “‘ Z need a master—command, direct me—lI will do whatever you will.” Ah! as soon as she is a woman again, as soon as she is gen- tle,.and no longer proud, all is kindly, all is smooth. The 40 The Woman of Letters. saints are pleased that she is humbled, and the worldly have good hopes of her. The doors of literature and the theatre are opened to her, all strive and combine for her. The more dead her heart is, the better is she established in life. Every- thing looks well again; those who made war upon the artist, upon the laborious and independent woman, now side with the submissive woman—and henceforth she has a support. The author of this romance tortures, but saves the heroine intheend. In her heart is the burning fire of truelove. She’ yields and subdues her spirit before she is degraded. Few have that happiness; most have suffered too much, fallen too low, to feel so vividly; they submit to their fate, and are slaves—fat and flourishing slaves. Slaves to whom? you ask. Slaves to that uncertain and unknown being, as frivolous as he is irresponsible, without consideration or pity. His name? It is Vemo—the name under which Ulysses escaped from the Cyclop. Here, it isthe Cyclop himself, the devouring Minotaur. It is nobody, every- body. . I said she was a slave—more miserably a slave than the planter’s negro, or the registered prostitute in the gutter. How so? Because these wretched sufferers have at least no anxieties, they fear no loss of work, they are fed by their masters. The poor camellia, on the contrary, is sure of nothing. She may be turned adrift ‘any day, and left to die of hunger. She seems gay and careless; it is her trade to smile ; so she smiles, and says: ‘Starved to-morrow, perhaps, and for a home a milestone!” Even in her-secret thought, she tries to be gay—afraid of being ill, and growing thin. It is atrocious to be unable to be sad; but she well knows that notwithstanding the some- what ironica] regard her friends express for her, they would never forgive her a day of languor, or the-least alteration, The Woman of Letters. 41 A certain hue of suffering, a slight sickly paleness, which would embellish the fine lady and make her lover mad for her, is the ruin of the dame au camellia. She is bound to be brilliantly fresh, or glowing rather. There is no let-up for her. . A very excellent physician, whom one of these had called in, as he was passing through her street, a week afterwards, with no other motive than pity, went in to ask how she was. “You see I am always alone,” said she. ‘He scarcely comes once a week, If I happen to be suffering on that day, he says: ‘Good night, I am going to the ball’ (that is, to find a woman), dryly leaving me to understand that I am good for nothing, that I do not earn my bread.” The manner in which the relation is annulled is the worst of it. M. Bouilhet, in his fine drama of Heléne Peyron, has put on the stage what may be seen daily. Her gentleman does not like to fling the bargain in her face exactly ; but it is so arranged that the abandoned girl, without a resource for the morrow perhaps, too credulously accepts the suit of a perfidious friend, who of course tells, and so the lover is free to accuse her of betraying him. In an immortal poem, of inexpressible tenderness, Virgil has described the bitterness, the fathomless sea of sorrows, into which the lover of Lycoris was plunged. Those servile courtesans, whom an avaricious master hired and sold, have drawn heart-rending verses from the unfortunate muse of Propertius, Tibullus, and their suceessors, They were instructed, graceful, and true ladies, more like our dame au camellia than the Manon Lescauts of the old: regime—so naively corrupt, a simple source of pleasure, who felt nothing and knew nothing. There is very great danger here; the surest way is to keep far away from it. One day, one of my friends, a distin- 42 No Life for Woman without Man. guished thinker, charitable enough, but with the manners of the time, told me that by such light relations, of no conse- quence, by avoiding any serious engagement, he had been able to reserve himself for study, and solitary intellectual exercise. I said to him: ‘What! you think that of no con- sequence? .... Is it not rather a great peril? By what philosophic effort of forgetfulness and abstraction can you see an unfortunate girl thus crushed by misery, by treachery perhaps, without having your heart torn by her horrible lot ? And if this poor creature, a plaything of fate, should happen to win your heart, you would be lost !”—“ 1!” said he, smiling (but with so sad a smile), “that cannot be. My parents pro- vided against that; they fastened the door that leads to the great folly. Before I knew I had a heart, they rid me of it. They killed all love in me.” This funereal remark made me shudder. I thought of the saying of the sophistical emperor, on the last day of the Roman empire: “Love is a convulsion.” Next day every- thing crumbled, not by the invasion of barbarians, but by that of celibacy and premature death. IV. NO LIFE FOR WOMAN WITHOUT MAN. Aw ever laborious life enriches us, as we advance, with new ideas, before unknown to us. Very lately, only last winter (1858-59), I found in my heart the meaning of little children. I have always loved them, but I did not understand them. I will hereafter relate the charming revelation I had from a German lady; to her, certainly, belongs the best of what is contained in my first chapters on education, to which you will come presently. In entering upon this branch of study, I believe it necessary No Life for Woman without Man, 43 first to understand the child’s anatomy. My friend, Dr. Beraud, Hospital Surgeon, and ex-demonstrator at Clamart (still a young man, but well known by the fine treatise on physiology, in which he is the author-colleague of our illus- trious Rolin), wished -to dissect several children before my eyes, in his cabinet at Clamart. He wisely reminded me that the study of the child is usefully illustrated by that of the adult. Thus, under his auspices, I was launched into anatomy, with which I was previously familiar only through plates. An admirable study, because, independently of its many practical advantages, it is fundamentally highly moral; it tempers the character—we are men only by the firm eye we keep on life and death. And, what is not less true, although less known, is that it humanizes the heart, not by feminine sensibility, but by informing us of the many natural offices we owe to humanity. An eminent anatomist said to me: “It is very painful to me to see a water-carrier under her weight of buckets which overburden her and cut her shoulders, If people only knew how delicate these muscles are in women, how weak the nerves of motion, how tender jthe nerves of sensation !”? My own impression was analogous to that, when, after observing the organization which renders the child a being fatally alive, on whom nature imposes the need of constant . change, I thought of the inferno of immobility his school life inflicts on him. So much the better did I like the good German method (children’s workshops and gardens), in which the teacher provides just what nature calls for, that is, motion —developing that creative activity which is the true genius of man. As long as you have not seen and touched these realities, you hesitate about all this, you debate, and lose time in listen- ing to praters, Dissect, and, in a moment, you will understand and feel it all. It is death which most of all teaches you to respect life, to economize, and not overwork the human race. 44 . No Life for Woman without Man. If I could doubt the moral infinence of anatomy, it would be enough for me to remember that the best men I have known were great physicians. At the very time when I was studying at Clamart, I saw there a celebrated English surgeon, who, at the advanced age of eighty-four years, crosses the sea every year to visit’ this scientific capital, and inform himself of the happy novelties which its inventive genius con- stantly discovers for the solace of humanity. I was especially interested in the anatomy of the brain. I studied a great number of them, of both sexes, of every age, and was sur- prised to see how naively the lower side of the brain answers, in its physiognomy, to the expression of the countenance. I speak of the lower and not the upper part, which is covered with veins, a circumstance to which Gall evidently attached too much importance. It is far from the bony box, but at the large bases of the brain, full of arteries, rising into more or less rich volutes, according to the development of intel- ligence, that the character reveals itself even as in the face. The latter, a coarse surface, exposed to the air, and a thousand shocks, deformed by grimaces, would speak, if there were no eyes, much less clearly than this interior face, so well-guarded, so delicate, so marvellously shaded. In common women who were known to have had coarse occu- pations, the brain was very simple in form, as though in a rudi- mentary state. These would have exposed me to the grave error of concluding that women in general, in this essential centre of the organization, are inferior to men. Happily other feminine brains disabused me—especially that of a woman who, presenting a singular case in a pathological respect, obliged M. Beraud to inform himself of her malady and her antecedents. Here, then, I had what was wanting in the other cases—the history of a life and a destiny. This remarkably rare singularity was a stone of considera- ble size found in the womb. This organ, now so ordinarily affected, but in no other case perhaps to such a degree, revealed avery extraordinary state. That in the sanctuary of generat- No Life for Woman without Man. 45 ing life and fruitfulness—should be found this cruel destroyer, this desperate atrophy, an Arabia Deserta I may say, a flint— that the unfortunate one should have been, as it were, changed into stone—immersed me in an ocean of sombre thoughts. Nevertheless the other organs were not changed as much as one might have supposed. The head was very expressive. If the brain was not as large, strong, puissant, as those of some men J had studied, it was as varied, as rich in convolutions— little wavy volutes, marked by an infinite detail, lately occupied, I felt, by a crowd of ideas and delicate shades, a world of wo- man’s dreams. All had a story to tell, and as I had had under my eyes a moment before brains of little expression— dumb, I was going to say—this at the first glance made me understand its language. As I approached it I seemed still to hear through my-eyes the echo of its sighs. The hands, soft and rather delicate, were however not ele- gantly elongated like those of the idle lady. They were moderately short, made for use. She had doubtless held little objects, which do not deform the hand but curb its growth. She must have been a working girl—in linen materials, per- haps, or flowers. That was the natural conjecture. She may have been twenty-eight years of age. Her eyes of a blueish grey, surmounted by rather heavy black eyebrows, and the peculiar quality of her complexion, revealed a woman of the West, neither Norman nor Breton, but of an interme- diate region, and yet not of the South. The countenance was severe, if not proud. The highly arched but not elliptical eyebrows indicated a worthy and undegraded person, who had preserved her purity, and strug- gled on even to the death. The body, already opened at the hospital, showed that an inflammation of the breast had carried her off. She had died on the 21st of March, within twelve days of Shrove-Tuesday. We were tempted to believe she was one of the numerous victims of the balls of that season—a cruel season, which sud- denly crowds the hospitals, and presently the cemeteries. It 46 No Life for Woman without Man. “might justly be called the feast of the Minotaur. For how many women does it not devour alive? When we think of the mortal ennui, the profound mono- tony, the disinherited, dry, and empty life the operative leads, especially the seamstress, with her eternal dry bread, alone in her cold attic, we are but little astonished if she yields to the young fool at her side, or to some older and more calculating fiend. But what always gives me a painful twinge is, that he who seduces her has so little heart, that he affords so little protection to the poor giddy girl, nor cares to know (he so warmly robed with cloaks) whether she returns clothed, whether she has fire and other necessaries, even anything to eat to-morrow. Alas! to cast forth into the frozen night the unfortunate, whose last caresses you have just enjoyed. Savages! you pretend there is only levity in all this. Not so. It is deliberate; you are cruel and avaricious; you fear to know too wuch about it; you prefer to be ignorant of the consequences, whether life or death. To return; in spite of the season, I doubted, from the countenance of this woman, that she was an étudiante, a habituée of those balls. That world is easily known. She would never have succeeded in it. Her severely cut nose, her firm chin, her delicate and precise lips, her certain air of reserve, would have made her too much respected there. The final inquest proved that I had judged rightly. She was a provincial girl, of a trading bourgeois family, who, in a city peopled for the most part by bachelors and clerks, had been unable, in spite of her natural goodness, to defend her- self against infinite assaults, a pursuit every hour. Under promise of marriage she had loved, and had a child. De- ceived, with no other resource than her fingers and needle, she had left her native city, in which, of all France, women are the least embarrassed, for they there earn whatever they are equal to. She preferred to come and hide herself in Paris, and die of hunger. She brought her child with her, a grave obstacle; she could be neither chambermaid nor shop- No Life for Woman without Man. 47 gir), and sewing yielded her nothing. She tried to iron, but in sickly condition, aggravated by grief, charcoal fumes pro- duced cruel headaches, and she could not stand all day with- out the greatest pain. Her sister-workers knew nothing of that, and thought her lazy; the Parisian women are full of ridicule, and they did not spare the poor provincial; nevertheless, out of their good hearts they lent her money in her trouble. Her sad robes of faded calico, which I have seen, showed that in her extreme misery she did not have recourse to what remained of her beauty. Such a garment makes one old, it left no chance of guessing how young and perfect her person still was. Sorrow and misery make one gaunt, but they do not wither, like excesses and enjoyments, and she, very plainly, had had little to do with the joys of life. The mistress who employed her to iron had charitably allowed her to sleep in a great loft, which served as a work- shop—a place strongly impregnated by vapors of charcoal, and which, moreover, had to be cleared in the morning for work. However she might suffer, she could not remain in bed, not for one day. The other women arrived early, and ridiculed her as an idler, and a good-for-nothing. On the first of March she was worse; had some fever, and a slight cough. That would have been nothing if she had only had a home, but not having one, she was obliged to leave her little girl to the kindness of the mistress to go to the hospital. She was received into one of our large old hospitals, where at that time there were many cases of typhoid fever. The skilful physician at once perceived that her fever would assume that character. She was asked if her general health was good. She said, modestly, “ Yes;” concealing her short internal pangs, and dreading a painful examination. In those great halls wherein so much of suffering is gathered, where agony and death surtound each patient, the gloom often increases the malady. Relatives are admitted on certain days, 48 No Life for Woman without Man. but how many have no relatives; how many die alone! She was visited once by her kind mistress; but the good wo- man was frightened by the typhoid fever, and did not return. The necessary ventilation is still, as formerly, procured by means of huge windows, and great currents of air. The need of a better plan is now seriously agitated. These currents chill the patients, who are but slightly protected by their curtains; and so her slight cough became, first, a violent bronchitis, and then an inflammation of the lungs. Exhausted by weak nourishment long continued, she had not the strength to react. She was well taken care of, but she died in three weeks. Her little daughter (a charming child, already full of intel- ligence) was sent to the Hnfants trouvés. Her body, unclaimed, was removed to Clamart, and, I ven- ture to say, very usefully, since it has instructed science on a point from which fruitful inferences may be drawn. This simple recital will also have been useful if it strongly com- mands the attention of benevolent minds. Woman dies if she has no hearth and no protection. If this person had only had a shelter, a bed for one week, her illness would have passed. away, in all probability, and she would still be alive. She should have enjoyed for a time the hospitality of a woman. How easy it would often be for an intelligent lady, at certain critical times, to save a creature whom misfortune has thus engulfed. Suppose such a lady, traversing a public garden, near the hospital, had seen her seated on a bank, with her little parcel, resting for a moment, before entering, after her long journey. The lady, seeing her so pale, and struck with her excellent countenance, which has an almost distin- guished expression, in spite of the extreme poverty of her dress, takes a seat by her side, and draws her into conversation. “What is the matter with you, young lady?” “T have a ) No Life for Woman without Man. 49 fever, madam—I am quite ill.’ ‘Let me see. I understand fevers, Oh, it is a trifle yet. At present, the prevailing epidemic abounds in the hospitals. You would be very likely to catch it. A little quinine would probably set you on your feet again in a couple of days. I shall have plenty of ironing to do. For these. two days, at least, come to my house; when you are well again, you shall have my work.” That would have saved her life. Two days would not have done it; but in a week she would have been restored. The lady appreciating the good charac- ter, so plain in-her countenance, would doubtless have kept her longer. Partly servant, partly young lady, better clad, beautified again by a few months of happier life, she would have touched many hearts with her pensive grace. The mis- fortune of having been deceived, and of possessing that pretty child, redeemed by her prudent conduct, her economical and industrious habits, would scarcely have checked the love of those around her. I have several times had occasion to ob- serve the tender and generous magnanimity of worthy work- men in this kind of adoption. J have known one such admi- rable household. The woman loved, I dare say adored, her husband; and the child, by a mysterious instinct, attached itself to him even more than to a father: he always left it weeping, and, if he was late, it wept for his return. We too easily imagine that a person is irremediably ruined. In our good old France they did not use to think so. For example, every woman who emigrated to Canada, was re- garded as purified of every fault and misfortune by the bap- tism of the sea. This was no vain notion; for they clearly proved the justice of it, and became admirable wives and excellent mothers. But the best of all emigrations for those, who, while yet scarcely more than children, have been cast by chance upon a frivolous life, is to rise courageously by labor and privations. So one of our first thinkers insisted, in a severe letter he wrote to one of our poor Amazons, brilliant and wretched, who asked 2 8 50 No Life for Woman without Man. him how she might escape from the gulf before her. The letter, very harsh in ‘expression, but in spirit very kind and wise, told her that she could expiate her guilt by misery, refine herself by labor and accepted suffering, and become worthy and pure again. He was quite right; the soul of a woman, much more mobile, more fluid-like, than that of a man, is never profoundly corrupted. When once she has seriously resolved to return to virtue, when she once has fairly begun to live by struggles, sacrifices, and reflection, she is, already regenerate. She is like the stream, which was turbid yesterday, but fresh waters have come in, and it is clear to- day. Ifthe woman, thus changed, forgetting the bad dream of her involuntary sins, in which her heart was never involved, succeeds in finding that heart again, if once she loves—all is well. The best man in the world may find happiness in her, and be honored by her still. I intended to add nothing to this mournful story. My friends were affected, and rose. But with a word I recalled them to what had preceded it: My dear sirs, the reason for which you will marry, the strongest motive for your hearts, is, as I told you, that: Woman cannot live without man. No more than the child without woman. All foundlings die; and does man live without woman? You yourselves have just said: Your life is sombre and bitter. In the midst of amusements and vain feminine shadows, you possess neither wife, nor happiness, nor. repose. You have not the sure foundation, the harmonious equilibrium, so favorable to productiveness. Nature has bound up life within a triple and absolute tie: man, woman, and child. Separately, they are sure to perish, and are only saved together. All the disputes about the two sexes, and their opposing No Life for Woman without Man. 51 peculiarities, go for nothing; we should put an end to them; we must not imitate Italy, Poland, Ireland, and Spain, where the weakening of family ties, and solitary egotisms, have -con- tributed so much to destroy the State. In the only book of the age that contains a great poetic conception (the poem of the Last Man), the author supposes the earth exhausted and the world about to come to an end. But there is one sublime obstacle: The world cannot come to an end while one man still loves. Have pity on this weary earth, which, without love, would no longer have a reason for living. Love somebody; for the salvation of the globe. If I have rightly understood you, you would gladly love, but apprehensions restrain you. Frankly, you are afraid of women. If woman were only a thing, as once she was, you would marry. But in that case, my dear friends, there would be no marriage; for marriage is a union of two persons ; and is therefore just beginning to be possible, because woman to-day is a person and a soul. But seriously, are you men? Shall the power you now exercise over nature by your irresistible inventions—shall that fail you? Shall the single being, who sums up all nature, and is all happiness, be beyond your reach? By your science you attain the sparkling beauties of the milky way; is it because the sparkling beauties of earth, more independent of you, send you back (as the Venetian girl sent Rousseau) to mathematics ? Your grave objection, about the opposition of faiths, and the difficulty of bringing women to your own, does not seem very strong to the man who looks at the difficulty coolly and practicably. Fusion will be completely effected only by two marriages, two successive generations. s 52 No Life for Woman without Man. The true woman for a wife is she whose portrait I have painted in my Book of Zove—she who, simple and loving, hav- ing as yet received no definite impress, shall least repel the modern thought, shall not beforehand be an enemy to science and to truth. I prefer that she should be poor, and isolated, with few family connexions—her position and education are secondary matters. Every French woman is born a queen or is on the point of becoming so. As a wife, the simple woman, who can be somewhat instructed, and as a daughter, the confiding woman, who can at once be taught by her father: these will break that vicious circle in which we revolve, in which woman prevents us from creating women. With so excellent a wife, sharing, in heart at least, the faith of her husband, the latter, following the very easy path of nature, will maintain over the child an incredible ascendency of authority and tenderness. The daughter does so trust in her father! He may make of her what he will. The strength of this second love, so lofty and so pure, will create in her the woman, the adorable ideal of grace and wisdom, by which alone family and society are to be restored in the future. Part I.—EpucaTION. I. SUN, AIR, AND LIGHT. Aw eminent observer affirms that numerous microscopic beings, which in the shade remain vegetables, assume a higher character in the sun, and become veritable animals. The fact is certain, indisputable, and accepted by everybody, that, deprived of light, every animal merely vegetates; that a plant can scarcely blossom, and that its flower is pale, lan- guishing, abortive, and short-lived. The human flower, more than all others, craves for the sun; the sun is its first and supreme initiator into life. Compare the child a day old, that has known only darkness, with the child a year old: the difference is enormous between the son of shadow and the son of light. The brain of the latter, as compared with that of the former, presents the palpable miracle of a complete transfiguration. We are not surprised to perceive that in it the apparatus of vision occupies more space than the organs of all the other senses combined. Light inundates the head, traverses it through and through, even to the deep, recondite nerves, whence proceed the spinal marrow, and the whole nervous system, the complete mecha- nism of sensation and motion. Even above the optical con- 54 Sun, Air, and Light. duits in which the light circulates, the central mass of the brain (the radiant crown) seems also to be penetrated by it, and doubtless receives its rays. So the first duty of love is to bestow on the child, and the young mother also, who was only yesterday a child, shattered by the accouchement, wearied with nursing, plenty of light and salubrious air. Grant her the blessing of “a good ex- posure,” that the sun may cheer her with his first rays, loving and regarding her long, revolving around her at mid-day, even at two o’clock, still warming and illuminating her, and leaving her only with regret. Leave to those who live the artificial life of the beax monde the splendors of apartments turned toward the Evening. Kings, the great- and the idle, have sought for sunsets in their Versailles, to glorify their fétes. But whoever sanctifies life by labor, whoever loves and has his fétes in his beloved wife and child, lives most of all in the Morning. To himself he secures the freshness of the early hours, when all life is energetic and productive. To them he gives the joy, the first flower of gaiety, which enchants all nature in the happiness of its awakening. What'is comparable to the innocent and delightful grace of these morning scenes! The good laborer watching for the sun sees it peep through the curtains to admire the young mother, and the child in the cradle. She is surprised, and stretches her arms; “ What! so late!? And smiling, says: “Ah! how indolent I am !”—“ But, my dear, it is only five o’clock, The child has kept you awake a great deal. Sleep, I beg you, an hour longer.” She does not need to be urged, and they go to sleep again. ; Let us close the curtains doubly, and shut fast the window- blind. But the Day, in its triumphant and rapid march, will not be excluded. A charming combat is waging between light and darkness; and it would indeed be bad if the night got the better of it. What a picture would be lost!. As she, inclining toward the child, encircles its head in the curve Sun, Air, and Light. 5 of her loving arm. A gentle ray insinuates itself. So be it, leave them with that sacred aureole of the blessing of God! I have spoken in one of my books of a strong and sturdy tree (a chestnut, I believe), which I saw thriving out of the earth, on air alone. We suspend in vases certain elegant plants, that likewise vegetate with no element but the atmo- sphere. Our poor peasants resemble these only too nearly. What compensates them for their imperfect sustenance? What enables them, so poorly nurtured, to endure such pro- tracted and severe labors? The perfection of the air in which they live, and the power it affords them of deriving from their food all the nutrition it contains. Thou, whose happiness it is to rear and nurture those two trees of Paradise, the young wife who lives in thee, and her child which is thine own—consider well, that if thou wouldst have her live, and bloom, and give good milk to that dear little one, thou must first provide her with the aliment of all aliments, vital air. What a misfortune, how sad a contradic- tion, to expose thy pure, chaste, charming wife to a dangerous atmosphere enough to poison her body and soul! No, not with impunity will a delicate, impressionable, and penetrable woman receive the horrible mélange, of a hundred vitiated, vicious effluvia, that rises from the street to her—the breath of unclean spirits, the pell-mell of smokes, vile emanations, and unhealthy dreams which hover over our sombre cities. You must make a sacrifice, my friend, and at any price take them where they can live. If possible, go out of town—you will see less of your friends, but they will come a little further to see you, if they are true friends: You will go to the thea- tre but little. Its pleasures (agitating and enervating) are less to be desired by him who has, on his own loving hearth, his own rejuvenating joys, his own “Divine Comedy.” You will lose less time at night, gossiping in saloons; and for your recompense, you will have in the morning all your strength, \ 56 Sun, Air, and Light. not wasted in vain words, but fresh and tranquil, to put into labor, solid works, those durable results which shall not fly away. Iwant a garden, not a park: a little garden. Man does not easily flourish away from its vegetal harmonies. All the legends of the East place the commencement of Life in a gar- den. A pure and capable people, the Persians, believed that the world began in a garden of light. If you cannot leave town, dwell in the upper stories of a house; more desirable than the first floor, the fifth or sixth may have a garden on the roof; at all events, light abounds there. Iwould choose for your young pregnant wife a vast and splendid prospect, to beguile her waiting reveries, during your long hours of absence. I would prefer that the eyes of the child, when it is first carried out on the balcony, should fall on monuments, on the majestic effects of the Sun, in its course, lending to them at different hours aspects so diverse. Where a view of mountains, tall shrubbery, beautiful forests, is wanting, we receive from grand edifices (in which is the na- tional life, the history of the country in stone) early emotions whose traces are for ever ineffaceable. Little children know not how to express their feelings, but their souls vibrate to the effects of architecture so transfigured. Such a ray, such a flash of light, falling at such an hour on a temple, will remain for ever present with them. For myself, I may affirm that nothing in my early child- hood made a deeper impression on me than the Pantheon as I once beheld it against the Sun. It was in the morning. The interior, revealed through the windows, shone like a mysteri- ous glory. Between the light columns of the exquisite Ionic temple, so grandly springing from its’ austere and sombre walls, the azure air circulated, roseate with an inexpressible gleaming. I was enraptured, fascinated, impressed, far more than I have since been even by very great events. They have passed away, but that vision remains luminous for me still. The First Exchange of Glances. a Il. THE FIRST EXCHANGE OF GLANCES, AND THE BEGINNINGS OF FAITH. Tux divine rapture of the first maternal glance, the ecstasy of the young mother, her innocent surprise at having given birth to a god, her religious emotion in her marvellous dream, which is so real nevertheless,—all this may be seen every day, but it has seemed impossible to paint it. Correggio has been able to grasp it, inspired by nature, free from the tradition, by which, in his day, art was restrained and chilled. There are spectators around the cradle, and still the scene is solitary, for it is divided between her and him, who are the same person. She gazes on him, moved; from her to him, from him to her, flashes an electric light, which dazzles and confounds them together. Mother and child are one in that living ray, which restores their primitive and natural unity. If she no longer has the happiness of containing her child palpitating within her bosom, she is compensated by the fairy- like enchantment of having him before her, under her eager eyes. Reclining over him, she trembles. Young and inno- cent, she reveals, by the naivest signs, her joy at assimilating to herself by love, this divine fruit of her own being. Lately he was- nourished by her, now she is nourished by him, absorbs him, eats and drinks him. A delightful interchange of life: the child giving and receiving it, absorbing the mother in her turn, like milk, and heat, and light. A great, a truly great revelation; no idle creation of art and sensibility ; a mere gratification for the heart and the eyes. No; it is an act of faith, a mystery, but not absurd; the serious and solid foundation of religion and education, ca which is to be raised the whole structure of human life; and the mystery is this :— é 3% 58 The First Exchange of Glances. Tf the child were not God, if the relation of the mother to it were not a worship, it would not live. It is so fragile a peing, that it could never be reared but for the marvellous idolatry of the mother, which deifies it, and makes it full of bliss to her to sacrifice herself for its sake. In her eyes it is good, beautiful, perfect; and it is needless to add, she beholds in it her ideal, the absolute of beauty and goodness, the acme of perfection. What painful dismay would beset her if some gloomy thinker, some awkward sophist, should dare tell her that ‘“ the child is born bad, that man is depraved before his birth,” and other such fine philosophical and legendary inventions. But women are mild and patient; they only turn a deaf ear. If they had believed that, if for a moment they had seriously accepted such ideas, all would soon have been ended. Uncer- tain and discouraged, they would not have put their whole life into a cradle, and the neglected child must have died. There would have been no humanity; history would have come to an end at its very commencement. As soon as the child sees the light, and sees itself in the maternal eye, it reflects, instinctively returns the look of love; and from that moment the most profound and sweetest mystery of life has been accomplished between those two. Will time add to it? Can the beatitude of so perfect a marriage be increased? On one condition only, perhaps; namely, that both have understood it, so that the child will disengage itself from the divine immobility ; will act, and seek to correspond with its mother; will go to her with all its little heart, and impulsively give itself up to her. This second season of mutual love and faith forms the sub- ject of a rare creation, which France possesses in the Louvre. The painter, Solari (of Milan), survives only in this one paint- ing—all the rest have perished. He had lived many years The First Exchange of Glances. 59 among us, and possessed the double sense, the soul of the two sister nations. How, had it not been so, could he have ac- quired that exquisite expression of nervous life, and its deli- cate sensitiveness ? In this there is no magical effect, no mysterious contest between light and darkness. In full noon, without artificial accessories, under a tree, in a pleasant, everyday landscape, are a mother and her child; nothing more. Here and there the crudity of its tone (the effect of restorations) offends the eye, but why is the heart so troubled ? The young mother, refined and pretty, and singularly deli- cate, is desirous of fulfilling a duty far beyond her strength. Not that her breast is wanting in milk; it is beautiful with plenitude, with visible tenderness, and a sweet desire to nurture. But so frail is this charming person that we ask ourselves how can she supply that beautiful fountain, but at the cost of her own life. Who is she? An Italian flower, swaying with slight exhaus- tion; or a nervous Frenchwoman? I would quite as readily believe the latter. The race, moreover, is much less ap- parent here than the epoch, which is that of cruel wars and miseries, when are felt. and expressed the touching charm that grief imparts to grace, those smiles of suffering women, who make excuses for their suffering, and would like not to weep. The handsome, vigorous, and largely developed baby over which she bends, reposes on a cushion; she could scarcely carry him—a striking disproportion, which, however, has no mys- tical significance, only that the child comes of a great race, of a father who doubtless even yet belonged to the heroic times, while the young mother, suffering, weak, refined, is of the period of Correggio’s “Italy :” a last drop of the divine elixir, under the pressure of grief. Observe also that in those days, the mother, although 60 The First Exchange of Glances. poorly nourished, nurses her child a long time; the more intelligent he grows, the sweeter he finds this indulgence, and the less desire he has to renounce it. She has not the strength for the great rupture; she exhausts herself, is aware of it, but will go on all the same, as long as she has a drop. She exhausts herself even unto death, rather than grieve her child. This picture of Solari says three things : Weak as she is, not giving of her abundance, but rather what isnecessary to her own sustenance, she nevertheless smiles, and says passionately: “Drink, my child! drink, it is my life.” But either the charming child, with an innocent avidity, has slightly wounded that beautiful bosom, or the powerful suction reaches within the breast and rends its inner fibres, for she has suffered, and suffers yet. No matter, she still says: “Enjoy, drink, it is my pain.” And the milk which rises, swelling and expanding the breast, flows forth; the pain, departing, gives place to a sweet languor which is not without its charm, like that of the wounded man who is pleased to see his own life ebbing away. But here there is real happiness: if she féels herself growing weaker, she grows strong in him. She experiences a strange and profound shock to the very sources of her being, but says, nevertheless, “‘ Drink, it is my delight.” :% Such is his invincible power over her that, whatever may happen, she cannot separate herself from him, and the result to him is that, understanding her, loving her, he is, both in his physical life and in his young heart, bound up in her, wholly absorbed in her. His love is calm in the innocence of his age—not, like that of his mother, sharpened by all the arrows of delight and ‘Play—The Child Teaching its Mother. 61 grief, but strong in its great unity. If he could speak, he would say: “Thou alone art my infinite, my absolute and complete world; there is nothing in me, which is not from thee, which does not wish to return to thee. I know not whether I live or not, but I am sure I love!” India symbolizes the circle of perfect and divine life by the attitude of a god holding his foot in his hand, concentrating himself, and forming himself into a sphere. Little children gften do this; and thus does this little one, invited to his mother’s bosom. She aids him to come to her, but he desires it as much as she, and does what he can toward it. By a graceful and charming movement, and a natural instinct, the first dawn of the deliberate impulse of tenderness, he makes a powerful effort, and contracts his whole body into an are as complete as possible, in order to offer himself at once, and entire. III. PLAY.—THE CHILD, TEACHING ITS MOTHER. Tuere is nothing more beautiful, nothing more touching, than the embarrassment of a young mother, a novice in mater- nity, puzzled how to handle her child, to amuse it, teach it to play, and enter into communication with it. She hardly knows how to take up her jewel, the adored mysterious being, the living enigma, that lies there, and seems to wait to be moved, and have its desires and its wants divined. She ad- mires it, moves round it, trembles at the thought of touching it roughly, and makes her mother hold it. Her pretty awk- wardness makes the old nurse smile; she observes it in silence, but says to herself that the young mistress is none the less a miss for having had a child. Virgins are maladroit: grace 62 Play—The Child Teaching its Mother. and skill rarely belong to her who is not a complete woman, already made pliant by love. Well, madam, since indeed you are now a madam—is it so many years since you were a little girl? At fifteen, if I recol- lect, under the pretext of trying the fashions, you were still playing with dolls. When you were alone, you were even wont (confess it now) to kiss and rock them. Now you see the living doll, which asks only to be played with. Play on then, my little lady; nobody will look at you. “But I do not dare. With this one I am afraid. It is so delicate; if I touch it, it cries; if I leave it, it cries—I tremble lest I break it !” There are mothers so idolatrous, so lost in the ecstasy of this contemplation, that they would pass the whole day on their knees before the child. In nursing it, gazing at it, sing- ing to it some little nursery song, they feel themselves united to it, and desire nothing better. But this is not enough; union consists much more in active will, in concurrent action. If your child did not act with you, would you ever know if it loved you? It is play which will create between you a union more intimate even than nursing, and have all the effects of a mental nursing. Form its young soul, its thought, its will, by play. In it slumbers an individual; call him forth. And your happi- ness will be that this soul and this individual, this desire and this will, shall at first have no other object but yourself. The first impulse of the liberty you have gained for him will be to return to you. Ah! how wise he is in this! How gladly do we all, after pursuing the false pleasures of the world, return to the maternal paradise. Proceeding from the bosom of woman, our only heaven here below is there. “J should certainly be very happy to become my child’s friend and companion; but what shall I do?” Play—The Child Teaching its Mother. 63 Little or nothing, my dear, but follow his example. Let us observe him, Lay him gently on the sunny grass, on this flowery carpet. You have only to look at him; his first move- ments will guide you; he is going to teach you. His movements, his cries, his at first powerless attempts to act, the little playfulness which follows, are not at all arbitrary. It is not your nurseling only that you see here; it is the child Humanity, as it was in the beginning. “This first activity,” says Froébel, “informs us of, and reproduces for our contemplation, the propensities, ideas, and needs, which first belonged to the human race. Some uncongenial element may be mingled with it, perhaps, in our modern races, altered by a factitious society; but, on the whole, it is none the less a very grave revelation of the remote past of hu- manity, and of its instincts for the future. Play is a magic mirror, in which you have only to look, to learn what man was, what he shall be, and what must be done to lead him to his destiny.” Let us at once derive from this the first principle of edu- cation, which contains all the rest: The mother teaches the child only what she shall first have been taught by the child. This means, that from him she derives the first germs of whatever she develops in him—that in the child she first detects a glimmer, which, in the end, with her assistance, shall become light. “Then these germs are good,” she says; “these gleams are sacred. Thanks! Oh, I thought so. I was cruelly told that the child is not born good. I never could believe a word of that—I felt God in him so clearly! Beautiful, charm- ing counsel! May it sink into my heart!—To keep my eyes fixed upon him—to make him my rule in everything—to wish nothing but what he wishes !” Softly, dear little one, softly. Let us first see if he is sure that he does wish, knows what he wishes. Let us see, rather, if, overwhelmed by a chaos of confused things which flow in upon him all at once, he does not await your 64 Play.—The Child Teaching its Mother. aid to choose for him, to enlighten him as to objects of interest. Here is a stroke of genius by the good Froébel; and here truly, by force of simplicity, he has discovered what the wise bad vainly sought, the mystery of education. Such the man, and such the doctrine. This German pea- sant isin a fair way to become an accomplished expert, for he possesses a singular gift of childlikeness, and the unique faculty of recalling the impressions of his earliest childhood. “JT was,” says he, “enveloped in an obscure and impenetrable mist. To see nothing, to understand nothing, is at first a sort of liberty ; but when our senses transmit to us so many images, so many sounds, the reality oppresses us. A world of things without meaning, without order or succession, come to us all at once, and without allowance for our feebleness ; we are asto- nished and disturbed, possessed and unduly excited. From so many ephemeral impressions weariness alone remains to us. It is a relief, a happiness, if a kind providence selects from the crowd of objects, and brings frequently before us, such or such that are easy and agreeable, which may occupy us only to refresh us and deliver us from that Babel.” Thus this first education, far from imposing restraint on the child, is an aid, a deliverance, from the chaos of diverse “impressions with which it is overwhelmed. By bringing things to it in order, one by one, that it may consider them at its ease, that it may observe and handle any little object that pleases it, the mother creates for it the true liberty that its age demands. To form in this way a good and reliable method, you must perfectly understand the tendencies of the child: an easy thing for her who, bending over it night and day, regards it anxiously, studying only what it is, what it wants, and the good she can do it. Play.—The Child Teaching its Mother. 65 First, it wishes to be loved, it wishes you to occupy your- self with it, and prove your love for it—Ah! how easy that is! Secondly, it wishes to live, to live much, to be always progressing, to extend the circle of its little actions, to move, to vary its life, to pass hither and thither, to be free.—Be not alarmed ; I mean free around you, the beloved; as near as possible to you, always able to touch your robe,—free, above all, to embrace you. Thirdly, already launched upon voyages of discovery, it is in no small degree preoccupied with a world of new things. It prefers to understand, through you—and it always goes to you—not by an instinct of weakness and ignorance merely, but by I know not what sense which tells it that everything sweet, lovely, and good comes through you, fet you are the milk of life and the honey of nature. And fourthly ; so young, scarcely speaking, scarcely walking, it is already like us; its heart and its eyes judge like ours, and it finds you very beautiful. Everything is beautiful to it, in proportion as it resembles you. Of everything which nearly or remotely recalls the pleasant forms of its mother, it says flatly: “It is pretty.” When they are inert things, it feels less distinctly their connexion with your living beauty. But even as to these things, you powerfully influence its judg- ment. The symmetry of double organs and forms, of your hands and eyes, supplies its idea of harmony. Besides, its glorious and truly divine characteristic is that it so abounds in life, that it dispenses it liberally to all objects. The simplest are the best for it. Organized, living beings may amuse it, but their independent action will perplex it; it would maltreat them, but without malice,—merely to understand them, and from simple curiosity. Give it rather things of elementary forms (for it is still an element) and of regular outline, which it can group together in its pastime. Nature, in her first attempt at association, 66 Play—The Child Teaching its Mother. creates crystals. Imitate nature—give the child forms like crystals. You may be sure it will use them, as it does so many other things, placing them side by side, or one on top of another. Such is its instinct; if you do not give it some- thing, it tries sand, which will not be fixed, and always disappoints it. Above all, never set a model before it, to fetter its action. Do not make it an imitator. Be sure, that in its mind, or at least in its memory, it will find pretty types for its tiny architecture. Some morning you will be astonished to recognise your house. “ Marvellous!” you willery. “He has done that himself— My son is a creator !” And that is the proper name for man. Moreover, in cre- ating anything, he goes on creating himself. He is his own Prometheus. And that is why, young mother, from the very first, out of the pure instinct of your heart, without daring to express it, you felt that he was God. But see! she is at once alarmed; “If that be so,” she says, “he is already independent, and presently he will escape from me!” No, no fear of that: for a very long time he will remain quite dependent on love; he belongs to you, and that is his happiness. If he creates, it is always for you. ‘“ Look, mamma, look!” (Nothing would be beautiful to him without the favor of your notice, the benediction of your eyes.) “See what I have made for you.—TIf it is not pretty, I will do it another way.”—So he piles stone on stone, block on block— “See here, my little chair, on which mamma may sit. Two pasts and one beam make one roof,—this is the house in which mamma shall live with her little boy.” : You are, then, his complete circle; he proceeds from you, and returns to you. The essay, the first effort of his inven- tion, is to honor you in his work, to entertain you in his house. The: Frail and Sacred Child. 67 Infantine and happiest life of all, and all engrossed in love! Who can remember it without regret ? IV. THE FRAIL AND SACRED CHILD. _ Wuen we consider how few children live, we are filled with a desire to render them happy, at whatever cost. One fourth die in their first year—that is, before they have lived, before they have received the divine baptism of light which transfigures the brain in the first twelve months. One third die before the second year—almost before they have known the sweet caresses of woman, or recognised in a mother the best of earthly blessings. One half (in many countries) do not reach puberty—the first dawn of love. Overwhelmed by precocious labors, by dry studies, and severe discipline, they never attain that second birth of happiness and enchantment. The best foundling hospitals may be said to be the ceme- teries; in the hospital at Moscow, out of the 37,000 children received in twenty years, only 1000 were saved; and in that of Dublin, 200 out of 12,000—that is, one-sixtieth. What shall I say of the Paris institution? I have seen and admired it, but its results are not very accurately known. In it are brought together two very different classes of children: 1. orphans, who are received there after being reared—and these stand some chance of living; 2. foundlings, properly so called, children brought thither at birth; these are sent away to be nursed, and their life is prolonged for some months. Let us speak only of the happy ones, of those who are sur- rounded by tenderness and foreseeing care. Look at them: all are pretty at four years of age, and ugly at eight; as soon” as we begin to refine them, they change, become vulgar, and 68 The Frail and Sacred Child. deformed. We blame nature for this; we call it the ungrate- ful age; but that which is ungrateful, sterile, and withering, is only the stupidity with which we force the child from a life full of action into one of barbarous routine—and turn its little head, full of sensibility and imagination, to things so abstract as philosophy or mathematics. To do this without injury to the child, many years of well-managed transitions are neces- sary—very short and very easy little tasks, diversified with action, but not automatic. Our asylums are still far from fulfilling these conditions. This problem of education, which is not only a question of future development, but most frequently of life and death, has often disturbed my mind. The world is divided between two opposite educational systems, and I have seen both fail. Education by simple teaching, traditional and authoritative, as it prevails in schools and coiieges (or small seminaries—for they all follow the same method), has lost prestige throughout Europe, and to its well-established insufficiency, the recent attempts at amelioration have added confusion. On the other hand, the free schools, which aimed rather at forming the character of the child than instructing him, which, inspired by Rousseau and Pestalozzi, were remarkable for their originality, flourished only for a season in Switzerland and Germany, and were abandoned. These schools appealed to the hearts of mothers; for, what- ever came of them, the child, in the meantime, was happy. But the fathers found that, with their very slow methods, they taught too little, and gave too few lessons ; so, in spite of their mothers’ tears, the children were sent off to colleges (lay or ecclesiastical). In these institutions, many wither and die: a few, very few, ‘learn, but only by superhuman efforts. A course of instruction so various, in which each study is carried on separately, with me The Frail and Sacred Child. 69 no demonstration of its relation to the others, exhausts and cripples the mind. Girls, of whom I shall presently speak more particularly, are no better educated now than in the time when Fenelon wrote his pleasant book, or when the author of Hmile sketched his Sophie. Nothing is done to prepare them for life; they are sometimes taught accomplishments that dazzle, sometimes (among the less wealthy classes) pursue a few serious studies which put them on the road to learning; but no culture pecu- liar to woman, to the wife and mother, no special education for their sex. I had read so much on these subjects, so many mediocre and useless things, that I was tired of books; on the other hand, my connexion with schools, my own experience in teaching, left many things obscure to me; so I resolved, this year, to go to the very source, to study the physical orga- nization of man, face to face with facts—to strengthen my mind by actual observation. The body tells usa great deal about the soul; it is much to see and touch the sacred instru- ment on which the young soul tries to play, an instrument which may reveal its character and indicate to us the measure of its forces. It was spring. The anatomical course was over in Clamart, and solitude reigned where all is so gay and populous in winter. The trees were full of birds, the parterre that embellishes those funereal galleries was all in blossom. But there was nothing comparable to the hieroglyphic flower I came to study. The term is by no means a fantastic compa- rison—it expresses my feeling. I experienced no disgust, but on the contrary, a sentiment of admiration, tenderness, and pity. The brain of a child, one year old, seen for the first time, from its base (the lower side as it appears on being reversed), has all the effect of a large and splendid camellia, 70 The Frail and Sacred Child. with its ivory nerves, its delicate rosy veins, and its pale azure tint. I say ivory, for want of a better word. It is an immaculate white, and yet of an exquisite and tender soft- ness, of which nothing else can give an idea, and which, to my mind, leaves every other earthly thing far behind. I am not deceived about this; my first emotions, doubt- less strong, nevertheless did not cause the illusion. Dr. Beraud, and a very skilful artist who paints anatomical plates daily, accustomed as they are to see these things, were of the same opinion. It is really the flower of flowers, one of the most delicate, imocent, charming objects in the world,—the most touching beauty that nature has ever produced. The vast establishment in which I studied enabled me to pursue a cautious method, to repeat and verify my observations, to make comparisons between children of different ages and sexes, and, moreover, to compare children and adults, even to extreme old age. In a few days, I had brains of all ages under my eyes, so that I could trace from year to year the progress of time. The youngest were those of a girl who had lived only a few days, and some boys, a year old at most. She had never seen the light; but they had had time to be impregnated by it. Hers was a floating brain, in its rudimentary state: theirs, on the contrary, were already as strong, fixed, and almost as well developed, as those of older children, or even of grown persons. This great revolution of the first year passed, the develop- ment of the mind (visible also in the face) modifies, more than the age, the physiognomy of the brain. In a little girl of four or five years, of intelligent countenance, it was traversed by convolutions and folds, more neatly arranged, more finely traced, than in those of many common women of twenty-five or even thirty-five years. The mysterious figures which the cerebellum presents in its thickest part, and which are called the tree of life, were much better outlined in this young child, prettier, and more clearly defined. This was not, however, an exceptional case; in many chil. The Frail and Sacred Child. 71 dren of the same age I found nearly the same development; and I came to the conclusion, that at the age of four, not only the brain, but the spinal marrow and the whole nervous sys- tem, have their greatest development. So, long before the muscles attain their strength, while the child is still so feeble, the brain is quite mature as to its nerves of sensation and motion ; it is already, in its most charming harmony, a human being. But, though thus developed, at this age it is still exceed- ingly dependent, and wholly at our mercy. The brain of that child of four years, pure and blank as an ivory tablet, full of sensibility, seemed to wait for something to be written upon it—to say: “ Write here whatever you please—I will believe, I will obey, I am here to obey; I am so dependent upon you, and belong to you so entirely.” An utter incapacity to avoid any suffering, or to provide what is necessary for itself, characterizes the child at-this time. This one, especially, advanced as she was, capable of loving and understanding, seemed to implore assistance. You might have almost read her prayer—for, though dead, she still prayed. I was greatly moved, but at the same time enlightened. The nerves of this poor little girl afforded me a very precise revelation and insight into the absolute contradictions which constitute the child’s state of being. , On the one hand, it is a mobile creature—more than all others moving by necessity. The nerves of motion are developed and active before the counterpoising forces which maintain the equilibrium. Thus its incessant restlessness annoys and often vexes us: we do not reflect that at this age the child is life itself. : On the other hand, the nerves of sensation are mature; con- sequently the child’s capacity to suffer, and even to love, is greater than is commonly believed. We have proof of this in the Mnfants-Trouvés ; a great many of the children brought there at four or five years of age are inconsolable, and die. Amore astonishing fact, in connexion with this tender age, is 72 Love at Five Yeéars——The Doll. —that amorous sensibility is expressed in the nerves more strongly than in the adult. I was alarmed at this; love, slum- bering as yet in the sexual organs, seemed already fully awa- kened in those parts of the spinal marrow which act on those organs. No doubt that at the first call they afford premoni- tions of it; we need not then be astonished at their innocent coquetries, their sudden tiniidities, their furtive movements of bashfulness without cause. Here is a pitiful phenomenon, which should make us trem- ble. This infinitely mobile being, remember, is at the same time infinitely sensitive. Be kind, patient, I pray you! We destroy them by harshness, often too by tenderness. Passionate and fitful mothers force and enervate the child by their violent transports. I would desire for such as these the painful but salutary impression that the sight of so ten-: der an organism would bestow. It needs to be surrounded by a mild and gentle and serious love, by a world of pure harmonies. The little creature herself, already amorous in organization, is in almost as much danger from furious ca- resses as from undue severity. Spare her, and let her live! oO Vy. * LOVE AT FIVE YEARS.—THE DOLL. Tr is strange that the excellent Madame Necker de Saus- sure should have thought that, till ten years of age, a girl and a boy are almost the same thing, and that what is said about the one will apply to the other. Whoever observes them, well Knows that this almost is an incalculable, an.infinite difference. Little girls, in the full levity of their age, are already much the more staid. They are also more tender; you will rarely see them hurt a little dog, or choke or pluck a bird; they have charming impulses of goodness and pity. hak Love at Five Years——The Doll. 73 Once, indisposed, I was lying on a sofa, half covered with acloak. A lovely little girl, whom her mother had brought on a visit to us, ran to me and tried to cover me better, to tuck me in in my bed. How can we help loving the delight- ful little creatures; nevertheless we must be cautious not to show it too much, not to fondle them too much. The little boy is wholly different; he will not long play in peace with a girl; if they begin at first to make a house, the boy will soon want it to be a carriage; he must have a wooden horse, to whip and manage. Then she will play by herself. He vainly “makes believe” to be her brother, or indeed her little husband ; even if he be the younger, she despairs of him, and resigns herself to solitude,—and this is what happens: It is chiefly in the winter, by the fireside, that you will “x” observe it, when people are shut up in the house, and do not run about, and there is little doing out of doors. Some day, when shé has been scolded a little, you will see her in a corner softly wrapping some object, a bit of stick perhaps, with linen, and a piece of one of her mother’s new gowns; she will tie it with a thread in the middle, and with another higher up, to mark the waist and the head—and then will she embrace it tenderly, and rock it to and fro: “‘ Thou, thou lovest me,” she says in a low voice; “thou wilt never scold me.” This is play, but serious play, much more serious than we think. What is this new person, this child of your child? let us examine all the characters the mysterious creature enacts. F You think that it is simply an imitation of maternity, that to imagine herself grown up, as tall as her mother, she wishes to have also a little daughter of her own, which she may rule and govern, embrace or scold. So it is—but some- thing more also: to this instinct of imitation must be added another, which the precocious organism imparts to all, even to those who may never have had a mother for a model. Let us name it aright: It is First Love. Its ideal is not a brother (he is too rude, too noisy), but a young sister, 74. Love at Five Years.——The Doll. gentle, lovely, like herself; who may caress and console he. In another aspect, not less true, it is the first attempt at independence; a timid essay of individuality. Under this pretty manifestation, there is, without her knowing it, a feeble desire to withdraw herself, something of feminine opposition and contradiction. She is beginning her réle as woman: always subject to authority, she murmurs a little at her mother, as she will hereafter at her husband, She must have an ever so tiny confidant, with whom she may sigh. For what? Nothing to-day perhaps, but some- thing or other which will come in the future. Ah! you are right, my little daughter. How, alas! will your small pleasures be mingled with sorrows! We who adore you, how much we make you weep! We must not jest at this—it is a serious passion. The mother should join in it, and receive with kindness the child of her daughter. Far from despising the doll, she should insist that the capricious girl be always a good mother to it, and keep it properly dressed, that it be neither spoiled nor beaten, but treated reasonably, as she is herself. You big children, who may read this—father, brother, cou- sins—I pray you, do not laugh at the child. Examine youre selves—do you not resemble her? How often, in affairs which you deem the gravest, a memory returns to you, and you smile—half avowing to yourselves that you have been playing with a doll. ' Observe, that the more the little girl’s doll is her own, the more that it is of her simple, elementary, but also personal, manufacture, the more has she set her heart upon it, and the more danger there is of distressing her. In the country, in the north of France, a poor and hard- working region, I once saw a very discreet little girl, wise Love at Five Years—The Doll. 75 beyond her years. She had only brothers, who were all older than she; born long after her parents had ceased to expect more children, they seemed to take it amiss that she had come into the world. Her mother, laborious and severe, kept her always near her at work, while the others played; the elder boys, moreover, with that selfish levity which marks their sex in childhood, rarely took part in the sports of their young sister. She tried to make herself a little garden; but they laughed at her attempts, and trampled on it. Naturally it occurred to her to make, out of some cotton rags, a little friend, to whom she might relate the tricks of her brothers or the scoldings of her mother. Her tenderness was lively and extreme. The doll was sensible, replied intelligently, and in the sweetest voice; ‘by her tender effusions, her touching recitals, it was equally affected, and, embracing each other, they wept. Onc Sunday it was discovered, and created much laughter ; the boys, tearing it from her arms, took great delight in throwing it up to the topmost branches ofa tree, so high that it finally remained there. Her tears and cries availed her nothing. She was faithful however, and in her grief refused ever to make another. All the winter long, she thought of it, and wept and wept to think that it was out in the snow and storm. When, in the spring, the tree was cut down, she begged the gardener to look for it. I need scarcely say, that long before that, her poor sister had been carried away by athe northern blasts. .Two years after, as her mother was buying some clothes for the boys, the ‘shopwoman, who had also toys for sale, noticed the little one looking at them. Her good heart prompted her to give something to the child for whom nothing was purchased ; so she placed in her arms a little Ger- man doll. So great was her surprise and delight, that she trembled and tottered, and could hardly carry it.—This doll, pliant and obedient, lent itself to her every wish. It was fond of dress, and its mistress thought only of making it beautiful and brilliant; but that was the ruin of it—the boys 76 Woman a Religion. danced her to death: her arms were torn out, and she fell so ill that she was put to bed and nursed. ° The little girl sank under these new blows of grief. Fortunately a young lady, touched with pity at seeing her so very sad, found among her trumpery a splendid doll, which had been her own. Although defaced by time, it was much more real than the modern one; its form was perfect—even when naked, it seemed alive. Her friends often caressed it; and. already it had preferences in its friendships, and showed gleams, and first signs, of a precocious passionate character. During a short illness by which the little girl was confined, some one, perhaps from jealousy, cruelly broke the doll; its mistress, on her recovery, found it decapitated. This third tragedy was too much; she fell into such melancholy that she was never seen to smile or play afterwards. Always de- ceived in her fancies, she grew weary of life, which she had scarcely tasted, and nothing could save her. So she died, sincerely mourned for by all who had seen the sweet, gentle, innocent creature, who had scarcely known happiness, and who yet was so affectionate, with a heart so full of love. ‘0 VI. WOMAN A RELIGION. In education, the father is far too much concerned for the future, that is, for the Uncertain. The mother is devoted chiefly to the present, and wishes her child to be happy, and to live. I take my stand with the mother. To live! which is really a most difficult thing. Men do not think of that; though they may have under their very eyes the spectacle of the trials, the watchings, the anxious cares, by which from day to day the life of a frail being is pro- longed, they coolly reason on what it will do ten years hence. Woman a Religion. 77 Let them, then, at least understand the indisputable, official statistics of the frightful mortality of children. To the new- born babe, death is for a long time the probable fate—with- out a mother, almost certain. The cradle is for the most part a brief moment of light between night and night again. Women, who write and print, have made eloquent books on the misfortunes of their sex; but if children could write, what things they would have to tell! They would say: “Take care of us, spare us for the few days or months gene- rally allotted us by unsparing nature. We are so dependent on you! You so hold us by superior strength, reason, and experience! For the little of skill and good management that you expend in our cause, we will be very obedient, we will do what you will. But do not shorten the only hour we have beneath the warm light of the sun and on our mothers’ knee. ~—To-morrow we shall be under the sod; and of all earthly goods, we shall take away with us only their tears.” Impatient minds will conclude from this that~I desire for children that unlimited liberty which would be our servitude, that I trust only in the child’s instinctive tendencies, that I would have him obeyed. On the contrary, I set out, as you remember, with the pro- found and original idea which Freebel first broached: “The child, left to the chaos of first impressions, would be very unhappy. He is relieved if the mother substitute for that wearisome confusion a small number of. coherent objects, if she understand these, and present them to him in order. For order is a necessity of the mind, and consequently hap- piness for the child.” Orderless habits, unbridled agitations, are no more neces- sary to the happiness of the growing child, than a chaos of confused sensations to the nurseling. I have very often noticed the little unfortunates who were left entirely to their 78 Woman a Religion. own fancy, and have been astonished to see how soon they are wearied by their empty boisterousness and boldness. For want of personal restraint they encounter every moment the restraint of things, the mute but fixed obstacle of realities; they fret against this to no purpose. On the contrary, the child, directed by a friendly providence and in natural ways, but rarely subjected to the tyrannies of the impossible, lives in true liberty. The habitual exercise of freedom in the paths of order, has this admirable result—that sooner or later it will inspire nature with the noble purpose of subduing itself, of con- quering liberty through a higher liberty, of seeking effort and sacrifice. Effort itself belongs to nature, and is its best element; I mean free and deliberate effort. I have made this explanation in advance, for the benefit of those who criticise before they read. I am still very far from imposing effort upon the little creature I have in hand. She is intelligent, loving; but she is, nevertheless, only an element. God preserve me, poor little one, from telling you all this! Your duty to-day is to live, to grow, to eat well, to sleep better, to run in the wheat, and among the flowers. But one can’t always be running, and you will be very happy if your mother or elder sister will play with you, and make you skilful in those labors which are games, Duty is the inner soul, the life of education. The child feels it very early ; almost at birth, we have inscribed on our hearts the idea of justice. I might appeal to that, but I will not yet. Life should be completely and firmly established, before its barrier is set up, and its action limited. Those who make a great commotion about morals and obligations with the child that is not yet sure of living at all, who labor to confine and circumscribe its needed buoyancy of action, are Woman a Religion. 79 only too stupid. Ah! wretched bunglers, lay aside your shears; at least wait till the material is there, before you dock, and cut, and trim it. The foundation of education, its soul and constant life, is what appears early in the conscience—the good, the just. The great art is, by love, gentleness, order, and harmony, to teach the infant soul, as it attains its true, healthy, and complete life to perceive more and more clearly the justice that already exists within it, inscribed in the depths of love. Let the child have examples only, no precepts—at least not in the begin- ning; he will of himself easily pass from one to the other. Without seeking, he will discover this: “I ought to love my mother dearly, because she loves me so much.” That is duty, and yet nothing is more natural. I am not now writing a book ‘on education, and should not stop to discuss general views, but proceed to my special sub- ject, the education of the daughter. Let us have done then with what is common between the girl and boy, and dwell on the difference. It is profound, and this it is: The education of the boy, in the modern sense, aims to organize a force, an effective and productive force, to create a creator; which is the modern man. The education of the girl is to produce harmony, to har- monize a religion. Woman is a religion. Her destiny is such, that the higher she stands as religious poetry, the more effective will she be in common and practical life, The utility of man, being in creative, productive power, may exist apart from the ideal; an art which yields noble pro- ducts may sometimes have the effect of vulgarizing the artist, who may himself retain very little of the beauty he infuses into his works. There is never anything like this in woman. The woman of prosaic heart, she who is not a living power, 80 Woman a Religion. a harmony to exalt a husband, to educate a child, to con- stantly sanctify and ennoble a family, has failed in her mis- sion, and will exert no influence even in what is vulgar. A mother, seated by the cradle of her daughter, should say to herself: “I have here the war or thé peace of the world, what will trouble the hearts of men or give them the tranquillity and high harmony of God. “She it is who, if I die, will at twelve years of age, on my tomb, raise her father on her little wings, and carry him back ‘to heaven. (See the Life of Manin.) “She it is who, at sixteen, may with a word of proud enthu- siasm, exalt a man far above: himself, and make him cry, ‘I will be great? “She it is who, at twenty, and at thirty, and all her life long, will renew her husband, every night, as he returns deadened by his labor, and make his wilderness of interests and cares blossom like the rose. “She again, who, in the wretched days, when the heavens are dark, and everything is disenchanted, will bring God back to him, making him find and feel Him on her bosom.” To educate a daughter is to educate society itself. Society proceeds from the family, of which the wife is the living bond. To educate a daughter is a sublime and disinterested task ; for you create her, O mother, only that she may leave you, and make your heart bleed. She is destined for another. She will live for others, not for you, not for herself; it is this relative character which places her higher than man, and makes her a religion. She is the flame of love, and the flame of the hearth; she is the cradle of the future, and she is the school, another cradle—in a word: She is the altar. God be thanked, all the debated systems for the education of the boy end here, all disputes cease here. The great conflict of methods and theories expires in the peaceful nurture of this Woman a Religion. 81 blessed flower; discords are disarmed, and embrace each other in Beauty. She is not condemned to strong and violent action; she will know, but not enter into, the frightful world of details, aver increasing, beyond all the powers of man. Will she ever rise to the summits of high speculation? Very likely, but not by following in our footsteps. "We will prepare ways for her to reach the idea, without subjecting her charming soul to the preliminary tortures in which the spirit of life is lost. What shall she be? Beauty. After what model, O mother, shall she form herself? Every morning and every night, offer up this prayer: “My God, make me very beautiful! that my daughter, to be so, need only look on me!” The end of woman on this earth, her evident vocation, is love. One must be very unfortunately constituted, very hos- tile to nature, very blind and crooked-souled, to pronounce, against God himself, that this delicate organism and this ten- derness of heart are destined only to isolation. ‘“ Let us edu- cate her,” they say, ‘to be self-sufficing ; that is the safest plan. Love is the exception, and indifference the rule. Let her know how to live within herself—to labor, pray, die, and work out her salvation, in a corner.” To this I reply, that love will never be wanting to her. I maintain that, as a woman, she earns her salvation only by constituting the happiness of man. She ought to love and bear children; itis her sacred duty. But let this remark be under- stood—if she is not a wife and mother, she may be an instruc- tress; in which case she will be no less a mother, and will bear the fruit of the mind. Yes, if it has been her misfortune to be born in an accursed epoch, when the most lovely are no longer beloved, so much the more will she open her arms and her heart to the universal 4* 82 Woman a Religion. love. For one child that she might have borne, she will have a thousand ; and clasping them to her bosom she will say: “I have lost nothing.” Let the men understand one thing, a noble and exquisite mystery that nature has concealed in the bosom of woman; and that is the divine doubt wherein, in her organization, love dwells. In men, it is always desire; but in her, even without her knowledge, in her blindest impulses, the instinct of ma- ternity overpowers all the rest. And when egotistical pride convinces the lover that he has conquered, we may see, most frequently, that she has yielded only to her own dream—the hope and love of a child, which almost from her birth she had conceived in her heart. High poetry of purity! In every season of love, when the senses assert themselves, the instinct of maternity eludes them, and bears love into sublimer regions. To educate woman, is to promote her transformation—it is, at every step of her life, by giving her love according to the necessities of her heart, to aid her thus to exalt love, and elevate it to a form at once so pure and so intense. To express in a word this sublime and delightful poesy: from the cradle woman is a mother, and longs for maternity. To her everything in nature, animate or inanimate, is trans- formed into little children. We shall perceive more and more clearly how felicitous this is; woman alone can educate man, especially in the decisive years when it is necessary with prudent tenderness to discipline his young liberty by bringing it into order. To brutally break and crush the human plant, as hitherto has been done, there is no need of women. But they will be recognised as the only possible educators, in proportion as we shall desire to cultivate in each child his peculiar and natural genius, which is of infinite diversity. None but a woman is sufficiently deli- cate, tender, and patient, to perceive so many shades, and take advantage of them. Woman a Religion. 83 The world lives by woman. She contributes two elements which create all civilization; her grace, her delicacy ; but this last is chiefly a reflection of her purity. What would become of the world of men, if these two things were wanting? Those who seem most indifferent to them forget that, without this grace, these forms at least of purity, love would be extinguished on earth—love, the all-powerful spur of our human activities. Delicious torment, fruitful trouble! without you, who would care to live? It is necessary, absolutely necessary, for woman to be grace- ful. She is not bound to be beautiful, but grace is essential to her. She owes it to nature, which has made her to be ad- mired; she owes it to humanity. Grace charms the arts of men, and imparts a divine smile to all society. And what must the child do to be graceful? She must always feel that she is loved. Let her be guided equably: no violent alternations of rigor and tenderness; nothing rude, precipitate, but a very gradual progress—no interruptions, and no very great effort. She need not be embellished with elabo- rate ornaments; but by a sweet absorption, create a new beauty which, little by little, will bloom out from within. Grace is a reflection of love on a groundwork of purity. Purity is the woman herself: Such should be the constant thought of the mother, as soon as a daughter is born to her. The purity of the child is at first that of the mother; the child should always find truth, light, and absolute transpa- rency, as of a perfect mirror, in her, which no breath ever tarnishes. In the morning and evening, both should make abundant warm ablutions—or better, a little cold. In all things they hold together. The more the little girl sees her mother atten- tive to neatngss, the more will she wish tq be like her in per- son, and soon in heart also, - 84. Woman a Religion. Purity of air and temper; purity and uniformity of influ. ences. Let there be no nurse to spoil below stairs what is done above, by flattering the child, and making her think her mamma, cross. Purity above all in her regimen and her food. And what is to be understood by that? I mean that the little one should have a child’s diet, that she should continue her milk regimen, sweet, mild, and not exciting; that, if she eat at your table, she should be taught not to touch your dishes, which are poisons to her. A revolution has been at work here: we have abandoned the frugal French regimen, and adopted, more and more, the heavy, bloody cuisine of our neighbors, much more appropriate to their cli- mate than to ours, and the worst of it is that we inflict this diet on our children. A strange spectacle truly, to see a mother give to the daughter she was nursing but yesterday, a coarse supply of half-raw meats, and dangerous stimulants, wine, and (exaltation itself) coffee! She is astonished to find the child violent, whimsical, passionate, when she has only herself to blame for it. What she does not yet know, but which is nevertheless of grave importance, is, that in our precocious French race (I have seen nurslings in love in the cradle), the excitement of the senses is directly provoked by such a regimen. Far from strengthening, it agitates, weakens, enervates. The mother finds it pleasant and pretty to have so lively a child, with repartees already, and so sensitive that it weeps at the least word. It is all owing to her being over-excited herself; she wishes her child to be so, and without knowing it, is a cor- ° rupter of her own daughter. All this is worth nothing to her, madam, and searcely more to you. You have not the courage, you say, to eat anything, unless she has her share. Well, abstain then, or at least be moderate in the use of such a diet—good for a jaded man, perhaps, but fatal to an idle woman—vulgarizing her, per- turbing her, making her violent, somnolent, or stupid. Love at Ten Years.—F lowers. 85 In both woman and child it is a kindness, a loving kindness, to be chiefly frugivorous, to avoid the fetid viands, and live rather on the innocent aliments which cost no creature its life—the fragrant fruits which delight the smell quite as much as the taste. A very natural reason why the dear creatures never inspire repugnance, but seem etherial in com- parison with men—is chiefly to be found in their preference ‘for vegetables and fruits, a purity of diet which contributes not a little to that of the soul, and truly assimilates it to the innocence of flowers. VII. LOVE AT TEN YEARS.—FLOWERS. Wuen the good Frebel placed in the pretty but rather awkward hand of my dear little one the elementary forms with which nature begins, he invited her also to the love of vegetable life. To build a house is beautiful; but how much more beautiful to make a plant, to create a new life, a flower which will expand, and reward you for your pains! A splendid red kidney-bean, the admiration of childhood, has been planted, not without some solemnity. But, to wait is a thing impossible at five years; how can she wait, inactive, for what nature does by herself? Next day, of course, the kidney-bean is visited. Taken up and put back carefully, it is not at all improved. The tender anxiety of its young nurse leaves it no repose; she removes at least the surface of the soil, With an indefatigable watering-pot, she importunes the idleness of the nonchalant vegetable; the earth drinks won- derfully, and seems to be always thirsty. So, in spite of the care and the watering, the bean dies. Gardening is a labor of virtue and patience; it is excellent discipline for the character of a child. But at what age 86 Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. may it be really begun? The little Germans of Freebel were to commence at four years; ours a little later, doubtless. I be- lieve that our little girls (much better than the boys) may, by their kindness and tenderness for the baby plant, undertake to wait for it, to spare it, and train it. As soon as one attempt has succeeded, as soon as they have seen, admired, touched, kissed the little being, everything is accomplished. They are so eager to repeat the miracle that they become patient. The child’s true life is in the fields; but even in town she should, as much as possible, be familiarized with vegetable life. And for this, neither a grand garden nor a park is necessary. She who has little, loves it the more—though it be only a wall-flower on her balcony, and that an extension of the roof; and she will profit more by her single plant than the spoiled child of the rich, let loose in great parterres which she has only learned to destroy. The care and assiduous contemplation of this flower, the relations which shall be pointed out to her, between her plant and such or such an influence of the atmo- sphere or season—with these alone her entire education may be carried on. Observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, will all come of it. Who does not know the admirable les- sons Bernardin de Saint Pierre derived from the strawberry- plant that grew by chance in a pot on his window? In it he saw the infinite, and made it the beginning of his vegetable harmonies, simple, popular, childlike, but not the less scientific. (See Alex. von Humboldt.) A flower is a whole world, pure, innocent, peace-making ; the little human flower harmonizes with it so much the better for not being like it in its essential point. Woman, especially “the female child, is all nervous life; and so the plant, which has no nerves, is a sweet companion to it, calming and re- freshing it, in a relative innocence. It is true that this plant, when in blossom, excited beyond its strength, seems to be animalized. And in certain microscopic species, it assumes in the organ of love a surprising identity with the higher order of being; but the child knows nothing Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. 87 of this beautiful delirium of plants, except from their intoxica- ting odor, and her constant motion prevents her from imbibing that too long. The little girl, who at an early age is so complete a being, much more delicate than the boy, more susceptible to nice impressions, has one sense the more—that of perfumes, of aromas. She could be penetrated by them and sometime enjoy a sensual expansion; but this flower is not for her an object of idle love, of indolent enjoyment; it is a necessity for labor and activity, an object of anxiety, success, and joy, an occupation for her heart and mind. In fine, and in a word; maternity cures love; the flower is not her lover, because it is her daughter. It is a bad and dangerous intoxication for the sedentary little lady, deprived of fresh air and exercise, to inhale in a parlor the concentrated emanations from an amorous bou- quet of flowers. And it is not only her head that grows dizzy ; one of our novelists has undertaken to show the doubtful virtue of a young woman who yields to such influ- ences. They would no less powerfully trouble the little girl, by hastening the sensual crisis, and forcing the blossom that should rather be delayed. Shall I confess (but what a paradox! how shocking to the ladies!) There are three things that I rather dislike: those babels of paintings, called museums, where the pictures kill off each other ;—those babels of warbling, called aviaries, where the nightingale, associated with vulgar singers, is in a fair way to fall into a patois;—and those babels of flowers, called bouquets, made up of all perfumes and colors, which zonflict with and annihilate each other. Whoever has a vivid and delicate sense of life does not with impunity submit to such confusions, such a chaos of things, however brilliant they may be. Every odor has its own fra- grance, its own mystery, and speaks its own language. All ' 3838 Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. together, they either shock the brain or trouble the senses— from which the nerves suffer, as by certain vibrations of the harmonica, It is voluptuous and cloying; we smile, but our hearts turn from it. The discrete odors perish barbarously, as by asphyxia. “Alas!” says the sweet marjoram, stifled by the powerful rose, “ you will then never know the divinely bitter fragrance which is mingled with the perfume of love ?” A certain woman, I knew well, never plucked a flower without regret, and in spite of herself—asking pardon of it. Each has its own peculiar pretty way, if it is peculiar. It has its special harmony, a charm it derives from its mother earth, and which shall never be taken from it. In a bouquet what would become of its ways, its graceful curves, the sweet and jaunty air with which it: carried its head? The simple flowers, which are the flowers of love, with their lithe and modest graces, grow pale or disappear amid the grand corollas of those luxurious virgins, that our gardeners develop by their skill. Let us then restore to our child the vegetable world, in all ‘its naive and sacred truth. While it is yet young, let it feel, love, and comprehend, the plant in its proper and complete life. Let it know the flower, not as a luxury and a coquetry, but as one stage of the plant’s existence, as the plant itself in blossom. It is a great injustice to court it with the fleeting pleasures of a vain adornment, such as an artificial flower, and forget the marvellous ‘reality, the progressive miracle hidden in a tiny sanctuary, the sublime elaboration of a future and an immortality, by which life every year escapes, and laughs at death. Taking a winter walk, in February, the little one, looking at the red buds on the trees, sighs and says: “ How soon will it be spring ?” Suddenly she cries out, for she has it at, her very feet—a little silver bell with a green border, the snow- drop, announces the reawakening of the year. Soon the sun resumes his strength. To his first changeful and capricious rays, in March, a whole little world awakes— Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. 85 the jeunettes, violets, primroses, and daisies,—the flower- children which, from their little golden disks, are called the children of the sun. They have not strong perfumes—except, I believe, the violet only. The earth is too moist as yet; the hyacinth, jacinth, and lily of the valley, seem almost wet in the humid shade of the woods. How delightful, how surprising! This innocent vegetation seems created expressly for our little girl, and every day she makes conquests from it, collecting, arranging, and binding to- gether the bundles of little flowers that she must throw away to-morrow. One by one she salutes each new-comer, and gives it a sister’s kiss. We will not disturb her in her festival of spring. But when, after amonth or two, she is satisfied, I will tell her: “ While you have been playing at nature, my child, the proud and splendid transformation of the Earth has been accomplished. She has now put on her green robe, with the immense flounces that we call hills and mountains. Think you it is only to give you daisies, that she has poured from her bosom an ocean of herbs and flowers ? No, my pet: the good nurse, the universal mamma, has first served up a banquet to our humbler brothers and sisters, who are our support. The good cow, and the gentle sheep, the sober goat that lives on so little and helps the poorest to live,—for them were these meadows spread. With the virginal milk of the earth they will load their udders, to give you cream and butter.— Take, and be thankful.” To these fresh and sweet supplies are to be added the deli- cacy of the first potherbs, and the earliest fruits. With the increasing heat appear in due season the currant and the mild strawberry, which our little gourmand detects by their exquisite fragrance. The tartness of the former, the melting lusciousness of the latter, and the delicate sweetness of the cherry, are the refreshments sent to us in the burning days, when the rising heats of summer enervate us, or when beneath an overpowering sun the labors of harvesting begin. This intoxication first appears in the rich but too penetrat- go Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. mg perfume of the rose, which gets in the head. The coquet- tish queen of flowers triumphantly leads in the legions of her more serious sisters—the medicinal flowers and pharmaceutic plants, useful and saving poisons. But in the sovereign labors of the great Maternity, come next those which are to nourish entire populations—the venerable tribes of the leguminose ; and the grasses also, the poor of the vegetable kingdom, who, as Linnzus says, are its irresistible valor and heroic force; though they be maltreated and trampled down, yet will they multiply the more! “Their two nutritious leaves (cotyledons) are as a mother’s breasts. Five or six poor grasses, with the abundant fulness of these breasts, support the human race.” (E. Noél.) My daughter, do not imitate the thoughtless, giddy child who, where a sea of gold rolls in the wind, of corn-poppies and blue-bonnets in their sterile splendor, goes in to pluck them. Let not your little foot stray from the strict and narrow line of the path. Respect our nutritive father, the reve- rend Corn, whose feeble stalk scarcely supports his head heavy with bread for to-mortow. Every ear you destroy is so much taken from the life of the poor and worthy laborer, who the whole year round has suffered, that it might thrive. Even the lot ofthe corn itself deserves your tenderest respect. All the winter lorig, shut up in the earth, it patiently waited under the snow; then, in the cold spring rains, its little green shoot struggled upward, wounded, now by a nip from the frost, now by a bite from the sheep; and it has thriven only by enduring the smarting rays of the sun. To-morrow, cut down by the sickle, beaten and again beaten by flails, broken and crushed by mill-stones, the hapless martyr, reduced to an impalpable powder, will be cooked into bread, and eaten, or brewed into beer, and drunk. Whichever way, its death is life to man, All nations, in joyous hymns, have sung its martyrdom, and the martyrdom of the vine, its sister. Even in the corn Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. gl resided, in the most concentrated nutritive form our climates afford, something of the sweetening, intoxicating property its sister brought us. The property of sugar-making, a singular process of the human organization, exists in these vegetables, which may, therefore, be said to be humanized. Such is the last effort of the year; when man wearies, grows feeble, and languishingly perspires, mother nature affords him a more vital nourishment. To the vernal age of fields and milk succeeds the substantial and strong age of wheat; and that is scarcely reaped and thrashed, when the humble little vine—trailing and creeping, because so much more delicate and tender—prepares its heaven-bestowed beverage. What labors here;my daughter: And what power over man does not this modest plant exert, this ugly, little, tortuous shrub, that you despised in the spring! Ifyou went through all Champagne, Burgundy, and the South, you would find perhaps a quarter of the popula- tion of France, millions of men, engaged, from the month of March, in setting the props, raising, binding, and pruning the vine, and heaping the earth around it; all the year on foot, leading the delicate creature to perfection. To kill it, a mere mist is enough. : Ever the harsh alternative—life or death. Every plant must die to give life to others. Have you not observed, near the close of autumn, when the season is growing pale, how gently the leaves fall, without even waiting for the wind? Each, with a few turns, drops, wholly resigned, no noise, and no resistance. The plant, whether it clearly knows it or not, at least feels, that its office is to nourish its sister, that to this end it must die. And so dying gracefully, it falls to earth, and, by nurturing with its débris the air that wafts it or the earth into which it penetrates, prepares the life of its friends, who are coming to renew it, to reproduce and restore it. g2 Love at Ten Years.—Flowers. It disappears consoled, and (who knows?) perhaps to rest—its duty done, and the law of God fulfilled. Thus, dear, if you have understood me, you have seen that beneath this brilliant circle of annual evolutions, in which each for a moment takes her place in the sun, there is another circle, sombre and mute, constituted in the depths of being by sweet sisterly interchanges, each unenviously retiring to transfer her life to the others. A world of peace, innocence, and resignation! But the supe- rior beings, subject to the same law, rarely yield themselves to it so completely.—“ Nevertheless,” says nature, “ what is to be done? it is not my fault. I have only so much sub- stance, and no more, to share among you all; I cannot increase it at will. It is but just that each in turn should have a little.” Therefore, she says to the animals, “ You, the favorites of life, so privileged by a superior organization, are not by that exempt from nourishing your sisters the plants, which, grate- ful and graceful, daily nourish you in advance. It is yours to pay tribute, but only of that which is worthless to your- selyes—your sloughs at certain seasons—your remains in death. ... That may be as late as possible; I have shown you how to retard it. But it must certainly come one day; for I could do no better.” This is but reasonable; is it not, my daughter ? ‘Ana the Father of nature, God, ahd made and endowed you, who has given you skilful hands (or fitted to become so), who has given you a head, as yet light, but gradually recipient of thoughts, grants you the distinguished honor of sharing in his labors. You shall germinate vegetable nurselings, and little daughter-flowers; you shall build up life, by partici- pating in the grand operations of God; and afterwards, a woman, and perhaps a mother, when your time shall come, you shall cheerfully transfer your life to others, and with a grateful grace vivify your good nurse, nature, and nourish her in your turn. The Little Household.—The Little Garden. 93 VIII. ee THE LITTLE HOUSEHOLD.—THE LITTLE GARDEN. Iv a choice of playthings be offered to a little girl, she will certainly select miniature utensils of cooking and housekeep- ing. That is her natural instinct, a presentiment of the duties the woman will have to fulfil; for she must nourish the man. _ An elevated and sacred duty—especially in our climate, where the sun, less powerful than at the equator, does not complete the maturity of many vegetables, does not ripen them sufficiently to make them digestible by man. So woman completes the work of the sun; she knows how the food, cooked and softened, will be assimilated by him, will pass into his circulation, to restore his blood and his strength. It is like another nursing; if she could gratify her heart, she would feed her husband and her children on the milk of her breasts. Unable to do that, she borrows aliment from nature, but brings it to them greatly changed, mingled with herself, and made delicious with her tenderness. From pure wheat, solid and strong, she prepares the sacred cake, by which the family partake of her love. Milk takes a.hundred forms from her; she puts into it her delicate sweetness and her fragrance, and it becomes a light and etherial cream, a most luxurious dish. The ephemeral fruits that Autumn lavishes, as though to get rid of them, she fixes as by enchant- ment. Next year her astonished children will see, brought forth from the treasury of her foresight, the fugitive delights which they supposed had perished before the first snows. There they are, made after her own image—faithful and unal- terable, pure and limpid as her life, transparent as her heart. O the sweet and beautiful faculty! The child-bearing! The slow, partial, but continuous creation, day by day !—She makes and remakes them, body and soul, temper and energy. She increases or diminishes their activity, stretches or 94. The Little Household——The Little Garden. slackens their nerves, The changes are insensible, but the results certain. What can she not do? The giddy child, playful and rebellious, becomes pliable, disciplinable, and soft. The man, down-borne by labor and excess of effort, is gr adually rejuvenated by her. In the morning, out of a heart full of love, he says: “I live again, wholly in thee.” Besides, when this, her great power, is wisely exercised, she has no occasion to restore, to cure. She is the perfect physician, creating, day by day, health and harmonious equi- librium, and barring the door against disease. Thinking of that, what woman’s, what mother’s heart, could haggle and find fault with nature. Love is an idealist, and in all that is essential to the life of its beloved it sees only spirit. The noble and high results, which these humble cares procure, elevate and ennoble them, and make them sweet and dear. A young lady of distinction, delicate and sickly, sould never allow any one else to feed her nightingale. That winged artist is like man—to refresh its burning throat, it would like the marrow of lions; it must have meats and _ blood. This lady’s servant found the task repugnant; but she, not at all; she saw in it only the song, the soul of love, to which she imparted strength. It received from her hand the banquet of inspiration (love, hemp, and poppy seeds), life, intoxication, and forgetfulness. Fourier has well remarked that children have a taste for cooking, and like to take part in it. Is it mimicry or gluttony ? But I do not mean to encourage mimicry, as he advises, Nor, since it is to become so grave a matter, would I have the child make sport of it, and waste her time in foolish little preparations for her doll’s repast. I would prefer that, after a time, when her attempts at gardening shall have made her skilfw, her mother initiate her in some duty in which the The Little Household—The Little Garden. 95 life of her father is interested, by which he who supports them may be nourished by them, by which the child may for the first time serve him, and be made happy by his “‘ Thank you, my daughter,” at the table. Every art developes new qualities in us. Housekeeping and cooking demand, in a high degree, the most exquisite neatness, and a certain dexterity. An even temper and a gentle character contribute much more to them than we sup- pose. No one who is rough and fickle can manage such things well. A just sense of precision is essential; and also, in the highest degree, an appropriate decision of character—to control one’s self, and know where to stop. Observe the more important endowments which the culture of the garden demands. At first it was only an amusement ; but as soon as it is understood and studied, in its relation to the life and health of loved ones, as soon as the garden has become auxiliary to the cuisine, it assumes an important aspect, and is much better cultivated. To notice, and take account of, a thousand variable circumstances; to respect the weather, and control her childish impatience; to subject her will to great laws; to be active, but to know that her own activity is not everything; to recognise the concurrent agen- cies of nature; and, finally, to fail often and not be dis- couraged—such is gardening to her—a labor made up of all labors; human life complete. The kitchen and the garden are but two departments of the same laboratory, working to the same end. The first com- pletes by fire the maturing process which the other began in the sun. They interchange kind offices; the garden supplies the kitchen, and the kitchen supplies the garden. The slops that are thrown out almost with disgust, are accepted (if I may believe an eminent horticulturist) as choice aliment, by pure and noble flowers. Therefore, despise nothing. The meanest refuse, even the dregs of coffee, are eagerly absorbed by vegetables, as a flame, a spirit of life; three whole years may pass, and still they will feel its warmth, g6 The Little Household.—The Little Garden. Let me instruct your child in these necessary laws of life. It would be a foolish reserve to leave her ignorant of the transformation of substances, and their natural circulation. Our disdainful young ladies, who know plants only to pluck them, are not aware that the vegeteble consumes as much as the animal. How do they live, themselves? They never think of that; they have a good appetite, and they absorb, but without gratitude, without a thought for the duty of restitu- tion. Nevertheless, they must make restitution, by death especially ; and they must make it continually by the pro- cesses of perspiration, sloughs, and diminutions of themselves —the losses and the little daily deaths which nature imposes on us, to the profit of the lower orders of life. This fatal circulus is certainly not without its grandeur. It has one very grave aspect, by which the child’s heart will be touched with a salutary emotion: namely, that our weakness daily condemns us to seek strength where it is accumulated, in our brethren the animals, and to live on their life. A double lesson this, by no means useless to the young girl, in that first impulse of pride, proper to her youth, her beauty, and intensity of life, which sometimes make her think, “I am; the rest is nothing. The flower and the charm of the world is myself, and all else is but refuse.” Flower, beauty, youth? Agreed. But do not forget the cost of them. Be modest; remember the humble and severe conditions on which nature parts with life: to die a little daily, before dying utterly; and every day, at this happy, loaded table, to be born again—alas! by the deaths of imno- cent creatures, At least let these animals be happy as long as they live. Teach the child of their right to exist, and the regret and pity we owe them, even when the needs of our organization compel us to destroy them. Caréfully teach her the uses they all have, or had—even those that to-day may harm us. The child is very poetical, but not much of a poet. Nevertheless our little one will fecl, by the instinct of her charming heart, The Little Household—The Little Garden. 97 much that would hardly impress her mind. The heroic maternity of the bird, constructing its nest with so much pains, submitting, for its children’s sake, to so many sore trials, will certainly strike her. And in the ant and bee she will. see, not without respect, and a sort of religion, a very different artistic genius from that which maternity inspires, The colossal labors of the ant, raising or lowering its eags, by the well-calculated scale of its thirty or forty stories, according to the air and sun, and all the variations of tempe- rature, will fill her with admiration. In these infinitely little things, she will catch the first gleam, the first delightful ray, of the great mystery, which is postponed for her,—the great, the universal Love. Knowing that there is but one happiness here below, that of creating, always creating, I have endeavored at all times to make her happy, by inducing her to create. When she was four years old, I put materials into her pretty hands, regular forms (analogous to those first attempts at asso- ciation that nature makes in crystals), and with these wooden crystals, joined in her own way, she erected little houses and other baby structures. Afterward, she was shown how nature, bringing opposites together in sympathy, makes veritable crystals, brilliant, colored, and so beautiful! She has made some herself. From that time, with her own hand, she has sowed seeds and made plants, and by her care in tending and watering them, has brought them to live and blossom. For silk-worms, she innocently collects the little grains, the seedlings of the butterfly ; these she tends, and keeps always about her, nurturing them with her warmth, and protecting them night and day in her unformed bosom. Some morning she has the happiness to see a new world, disclosed to her by her own young love. 5 98 The Maternities of Fourteen. Thus she goes on, creating and happy. Continue to have children, my daughter. Associate yourself, dear little one, with the great Maternity. It costs your tender heart nothing. You create in profound peace. .To-morrow, it will cost you more, and your heart will bleed.—Mine also ; ah! believe that well. But for to-day, let us enjoy. Nothing is more’plea- sant to me than to observe, in such complete repose, in such touching innocence, your little fecundities. They reassure me for your lot; whatever may happen, you will have had your part in this world, participating in the divine work, and creating. IX. THE MATERNITIES OF FOURTEEN.—THE METAMORPHOSIS. I wave feared but one thing for this child: and that is, secresy ; I know some who are pensive at four years of age. But happily she has been preserved from that: first, by her active life; and then, because from her birth she has had a confidante in her mother, so that she gould think aloud. ‘Woman, all her life long, must overflow and discharge her- self. While yet she was very little, her mother took her in her lap every night, and, heart to heart, made her speak. Ah! what a happiness to confess, to excuse, or even accuse one’s self. “So talk my child, talk on! If it is good I will embrace you. And, if it is not good, why, to-morrow we will both try to do better.” So she tells everything ; what does she risk? Much; “for mamma will suffer, if I have been bad.”—“ No, my dear—tell me all the same; and even if it makes me cry, your heart shall flow with mine.” Her filial confession is the whole mystery of childhood. By © The Maternities of Fouttedi : 39 this confession she has every evening suggested her own edu- cation. On so soft a pillow her sleep is deep ; but, what then? She wakes at last. -Thirteen years and a half have passed, and she is drooping. What is the matter, darling? Until now, you have lacked nothing for your amusement. When your own doll did not satisfy you, I gave you living ones; you have played at doll with all nature; you have loved flowers much, and been loved by them; your free birds follow you, even to forgetting their nests; and the other day the bulfinch (this is no invention) left its mate for you. _ I guess—you need a friend; neither bird nor flower, but- terfly nor dog—but a friend like yourself. When she was four or five years old, her mother always took her to play in the Jardins d’ Enfants. But now, in the country, she has no more little girls. To be sure, there is her brother, younger than herself, whom once she loved so much, and who clung to her. But now she would have him be a girl, or he would like her better if she were a boy. To get him away from the excessive cares of his mother and sister, and under more masculine influences, he was placed in the house of a friend, until he went to the public schools. The boys he brought home with him have rendered the house un- inhabitable. My little girl has conceived a great antipathy to the blustering race. Their cries, blows, and scufiles frighten her. Like her gentle and discreet mother, she loves order, peace, silence—or pretty games in a low tone. Meantime, I see her walking by herself in a garden-path, and I call her to-me. Always obedient, she comes—but rather slowly, her heart swollen, and her eyes moist. What is the matter? In vain does her mother kiss and caress her: she is dumb, and cannot reply,.for she knows not what it is. We, who understand her case, must find a remedy for it—the one which at all times has succeeded with her; we will give her a new love. Her mother who pities her very much, tries from that day 100 The Maternities of Fourteen. to draw her out of her troubled state, by placing in ler arms not a thing but a person. She will forthwith take her to the village school, and show her the little children. At first the young dreamer, the great girl, finds the poor creatures somewhat insipid; but she is shown that they have not everything they need: this one is very scantily clad; that one needs a new dress; this one has come to school without her breakfast, because her mother has no bread; that one has no mother, and her father, too, is dead; at four years of age she is alone, and is provided for just as it may happen. Our darling’s young heart awakes at this. With- out a word, she takes the child, and begins to arrange her dress, She is not unskilful; one would think she had handled children all her life. She oe her, kisses her, and brings her bread, butter, fruit, and everything she has, Wweethor fell in love with Charlotte at seeing her give a slice of bread to the chil- dren. So should I. The little orphan interests her in the others. One is pretty, another so knowing; one has been sick, another beaten, and must be consoled. They all please her, all amuse her. What a pleasure to play with such delightful dolls, that speak, and laugh, and eat, have wills of their own, and are almost people! What a pleasure to make them play! And, with this idea, she goes to playing herself—the great innocent baby! Even at home she thinks of them; and the more she thinks, the livelier she becomes. At once gay and serious—as is always the case when one has suddenly a great interest in life—she no longer walks in solitude; but seeks her mother, talks with her, requires her co-operation, begs for this favor, bargains for that. Every day she spends all her spare time with the children; and lives wholly within her own little world, so full of variety for those who see it near at hand and mingle with it. Therein she has her friendships, her semi-adoptions, her preferences— her tendernesses enhanced by charity, sometimes little cares, then joys, extreme delights, and perchance even tears. But v The Maternities of Fourteen. 101 she knows why she weeps; and the worst thing for young girls is to weep without knowing why! She was just fourteen in May—those were her first roses. After a rain, the season, thenceforth serene and beautiful, bloomed out in all its glory. She, too, had experienced a short interval of storms—with fever and some suffering ; it had left her, for the first time a little weak, a little pale, while an almost imperceptible shade of delicate blue, or faint lila¢, en- circled her eyes. She was not very tall; but her figure had changed, had gracefully developed ; lying down a child, in a few days she had arisen a young woman. Lighter, and yet less active, she no longer merited the names her mother had given her: “My bird! my butterfly !” Her first impulse on revisiting her garden, changed and grown beautiful like herself, was to gather some flowers for her father and mother, who had of late petted her even more than usual. She rejoined them smiling, with her pretty offer- ing; and found them much moved, saying nothing to each other, but mute with the same thought. For the first time, perhaps, for a long while, they placed her between them. When she was a little thing, just learning to walk alone, she needed to see them thus within reach of her, on her right and left. But now, almost as tall as her mother, she felt, very tenderly, that it was they who needed to have her between then. They gathered her into their hearts with a love so profound, that her mother could scarce restrain her tears. / “Dear mamma! what is the matter ?”—and she threw her- self on that dear bosom. Her mother loaded her with caresses, but did not answer, fearing to give vent to her own emo- tions. At last, a little composed, although tears still dimmed her eyes, Mamma said, smiling: “I was telling your father what I dreamed last night. You were alone in the garden, 102 The Maternities of Fourteen. and torn by the cruel thorns of a rose-bush; I wished to bind up your wounds, but could not; so you were ruined for life. I was dead, yet I saw it all.’ “Oh! mamma, then never die!” And she fell, blushing, into her mother’s arms. These three persons, at that moment, were wholly united in heart. But I should not say three !—they were one. Through love, they existed in their daughter, she in them. There was no need to speak a single word; they understood each other so well. They no longer saw each other distinctly, for it was already dusk; and they went out, dim and shadowy—the father supporting her on his arm, the mother embracing the little one, and supported by her. No longer could be heard the songs of birds, but only their faint twitterings, their last confidential chat, as they crowded into the nest. These murmurs are very charming and very various; some noisy and eager, overjoyed at meeting again; others very melancholy, troubled by the shadows of night, seemed to say to each other, “ Who is sure of waking to-mor- row?” ‘The trustful nightingale returning to its nest, almost on.the ground, crossed the court at their very feet; and the mother, tenderly moved, bade it.good-night: ‘God keep thee, poor little thing !” Nothing is easier than the revelation of sex to a child thus prepared. For her who is kept in ignorance of its general laws, who learns the whole mystery at once, it is a serious and a dangerous thing. What are we to think of the imprudence of those parents who leave this revelation to chance? For what is chance? It is often some companion, neither innocent nor of pure imagination; oftener than would be believed, it is a flippant sensual speech from a boy, some near relative. Many mothers will indignantly deny this; their children are all perfect ;—they are so infatuated with their sons as to dis- believe truth itself, History as a Basis of Faith. 103 However that may be, if this mystery be not revealed by the mother, it may be overwhelrning and blasting, annihilating the judgment. At such a time, before she recovers herself, the poor little one is, as it were, at any one’s mercy. As for her who has early and naturally learned of the generation of plants and of insects, who knows that in every species life renews itself from the egg, and that all nature is engaged in the perpetual labor of ovulation, she is not at all astonished to find herself subject to the same common law. The painful changes which every month accompany the phe- nomenon seem also very natural, when she has seen the same laborious processes in the inferior creatures. All this appears to her noble, grand, and pure, as it harmo- nizes with the general law of creation—grander still when she sees in it the continual restoration of what death destroys. “Death pursues us, and hurries us on, my dear child,” says her mother ; ‘our only defence is in marriage. Your father and I shall die; and to compensate for our loss, it will be necessary for you, probably, even before that time, to leave us and be married. Like me, you will with great pain give birth to children; who perhaps will not live, or, if they do live, will leave you. This is what I foresee, and it makes me weep. —But I am wrong; our lot is in common with that of all creatures, and it is God’s will.” X. HISTORY AS A BASIS OF FAITH. Rovssxatv, first among the moderns to establish systems of education, seems to me not to have seen clearly that a system is not everything. He is concerned only as to the way in which the pupil may be formed; or, rather, how the pupil, assisted in his own proclivities, may form himself, and become capable 104 History as a Basis of Faith. of learning everything. I am not criticizing his work; I sim- ply remark that he says not a single word about the second problem of education: What shall be the principal object of study? What shall this pupil be taught? Suppose Rousseau has succeeded in forming an energetig, active mind, inde- pendent of ordinary routines—to what shall it apply itself? Is there not some science in which it may find its develop- ment, its natural gymnastics? It is not enough to create the subject ; we must determine the object on which it may be exercised with the most advantage. I will call this object, the gubstance of education. In my opinion, this should be altogether different, as it is to be applied to the boy or the girl. If we desire better results in education than we have achieved heretofore, we must gravely consider the incalculable differences which not only separate but even oppose the two sexes—which constitute them harmonious opponents. Their vocations and natural tendencies differ; so should their education differ—differ in method—harmonizing for the girl, strengthening for the boy,—differ in its object, as to the principal study on which the mind should be exercised. For man, who is called to labor, to battle with the world, the great study is History, the story of this combat—history aided by languages, in each of which is the genius of a people —history prompted by Right, writing under and for it, con- stantly inspired, revised, and corrected by eternal Justice. For woman, the gentle mediator between nature and man, between father and child, the study, thoroughly practical, reju- venating, and embellishing, is Nature. , The man passes from drama to drama, not one of which re- sembles another, from experience to experience, from battle to battle. History goes forth, ever far-reaching, and continually erying to him: “ Forward !” The woman, on the contrary, follows the moble and serene epic that Nature chants in her harmonious cycles, repeating herself with a touching grace of constancy and fidelity. These History as a Basis of Faith. 105 refrains in her lofty song bestow peace, and, if I may say so, a relative changelessness. This is why the study of Nature never wearies, never jades; and woman can trustingly give herself up to it, for Nature is a woman. History, which we very foolishly put in the feminine gender, is a rude, savage male, a sun-burnt, dusty traveller. God forbid that I should lead the tender feet of this child through so rough a pilgrimage: she would soon droop, her breath would fuil her, and, fainting, she would sink on the highway. History! my daughter, history! I must indeed give you some of it; and I will give it to you, fresh and strong, sim- ple, honest, bitter as it is; fear not that, in tenderness, I will sweeten it with poisonous honey. But I am not required to make you swallow the whole, poor child, to pour down your throat in torrents that terrible tonic in which poison pre- dominates, te make you empty even to the dregs the cup of Mithridates. What I owe you of history is, first, your own story; what I should tell you is of your own cradle, and of that which sup- ports the very prop of your moral life. I should tell you first how you were born—the pain, the infinite cares of your mo- ther, and all her watchings; how many times she has suffered, wept, almost died for you. Let that history, my child, be your cherished legend, your pious souvenir, your first religion here below. Then I should tell you briefly what is and what was your second mother—that noble mother, your Country. God has granted you the distinction to be born in this land of France, with which the whole world, my child, is either enraged or enamored ; no one is indifferent to her—all speak either good or evil of her—right or wrong, who knows? As for us, we say of her only thus—that, “ Men suffer gaily nowhere but in France. Hers are the only people who know how to die.” 5* 106 History as a Basis of Faith. Of the long lives of your fathers you will know the great events if you learn that at the sacred period when your country was laid upon the altar, Paris proclaimed to France the wish, the resolve of all, “To lose themselves in the great whole.” From this united effort France became as one person; she felt her heart beating, and questioned it; and she discerned in that first throb, the holy brotherhood of earth, the wish to free the world. This is your pedigree, oh maiden! exalt it, and may you love only heroes! From France you shall go forth into the world. We will prepare together, just as in a garden, plots of ground suitable to plant nations in. Pleasant and animating is the study of soils, of climates, of the forms of the globe, which in so many ways have determined the actions of men, and often made their history in advance. Here the earth has commanded, man obeyed; and sometimes, such or such a vegetable, such or such a regimen, has made such or such a civilization. Some- times the internal force of man has uprisen to react, to strug- gle against this; in these combats the good friend of your child- hood, Nature, and the natural sciences unite, and harmonize with the moral sciences, in which life will initiate you. Is the teaching of history the same for boys and girls? Yes, doubtless, as a basis of faith. To both it imparts its rich moral fruit, strength to the heart, and nourishment to life— to wit, the grand consent of the human soul on the question of justice, the historic agreement of the creeds of the human race as to duty and God. But let it be better understood that, man being destined for business, to a combat with the world, history is peculiarly adapted to prepare him for it. To him it is the treasure-house of experience, an arsenal of the weapons of all kinds that he shall wield to-morrow. For the girl, history is principally a moral and religious basis. History as a Basis of Faith. 107 Woman, who seems so changeable, and who doubtless is physically renewed month by month, must yet fulfil on earth, much more inexorably than man, two fixed conditions. Every woman is an altar, a pure and holy thing, where man, bewildered by life, may at all times go for faith, and find again his own conscience, preserved purer than in himself. Every woman is a school, and it is really from her that generations receive their creeds. Long before the father dreams of edu- cating, the mother has inculcated her own teachings, which will never be effaced. The daughter must have a religious belief. Snares will soon be set for her, and the most dangerous pro- ceed from the uprooting of established faith. She will not be twenty, perhaps but two years married, a mere child, when they will begin to explore the ground. Pleasant people will come to chat, to laugh at everything, to ridicule everything good that her father had been able to teach her, the simple faith of her mother, the thoughtfulness of her husband—to make her think it fine to laugh at everything with them, and deem nothing sure here below. She must have a faith, so that this base and selfish trifling may create in her only disgust, so that she may oppose it with the seriousness, the gentle firmness, of a soul which has for itself a fixed foundation of belief, planted in reason, in sim- plicity of heart, in the concurring, unanimous heart-voice of the nations. From-the very first, the father and mother should agree that under the successive forms in which, according to her age, history shall be presented to her, she shall always: per- ceive its moral harmony and its holy unity. Her mother, under the lacteal form—that is, through the pleasant medium of a language simplified for her—will have told her, at first, of some of the great and prominent events, which she has described in her own way. Her father, in the intermedial age (ten or twelve years perhaps), will have given her care- fully selected readings from original writers—some story of 108 History as a Basis of. Faith. Heredotus, the Retreat of the Ten Thousand, the Life of Alexander the Great, some of the beautiful Bible stories; to which may be added the Odyssey, and those modern Odysseys, our own fine travels; all these to be read very slowly, and always in the same spirit, so as to show her, under such external differences of manners, habits, religions, how little man himself has changed. For the most part the discords are but seeming discords, or sometimes demanded by pecu- liarities of race or climate. Common sense will explain all that. As to the family, for instance, we see clearly that it cannot be the same under the physical fatalities of that hot-bed of India, where the wife is a child, married at eight or ten. But as soon as we come into a free and natural world, the ideals of family are absolutely identical. It is the same in Zoroaster, in Homer, the same in Socrates (see the admirable passage from the Economics of Xenophon), the same, finally, in Rome, and among us. We learn from Aristophanes that the Greek women, not at all dependent, ruled at home, and often exer- cised a powerful influence in the state. We see this in Thu- cydides, where the men had voted for the massacre of Lesbos; but returning home at night, and confronting their wives, they retracted and reversed their decree. Laws deceive us greatly. It is supposed, for example, that wherever the son-in-law pays the father, he purchases his wife, and she is his slave. But that isa mistake. This form of marriage exists indeed in Africa, and yet it is among those very tribes that the wife, free and a queen, rules—and not the man (Livingston). The payment does not constitute the purchase of the wife, but an indemnity to her father for the prospective children which shall not profit his family, but the one into which the wife is about to enter. It is curious to note how sceptics seize upon this, to create discords and exceptions to the rule, and to prove that there is no rule. The enemies of moral sense and human reason have no choice but to seek in the most suspicious sources for facts not easily understood. History as a Basis of Faith. 109 “But,” says the father, “ whence shall I derive penetra- tion enough to find my own way, and to guide my child through so many obscurities ?” Strong and genuine criticism is born of the heart, rather than the intellect ; it springs from loyalty, from the impartial sympathy we owe to our brothers of the past and of the present. With this you will have no difficulty in tracing through history the great unchang- ing current of human morality. Will you believe one who has made the great voyage more than once? His experience is precisely that of the voyager as he sails out of the Caribbean Sea; at the first glance, he sees only the wide expanse of water; in the second, on the green field he discerns a broad band of blue; that is the immense torrent of warm floods which, crossing the Atlantic, reaches Ireland, still warm, and is not entirely cooled even at Brest. He sees it perfectly, and moreover, can feel its warmth on the passage. Just so will the great current of moral tra- dition appear, if you scan the ocean of history with caretul eyes, But long before we reach this elevated simplification, in which history becomes identical with morality itself, I should desire my young maiden to be pleasantly nourished with pure and wholesome reading, borrowed especially from anti- quity, from the primitive East. How happens it that we put into the hands of children the history of grown up nations only, while we leave them ignorant of the infancy and youth of the world? If some one would collect a few of the truly spiritual hymns of the Vedas, some of the prayers and laws of Persia, so pure and so heroic, and add a few of those touch- ing pastorals from the Bible, such as the stories of Jacob, Ruth, and Tobias, he would present the young girl with an incompara- ble bouquet, whose perfume, early and slowly inhaled, would impregnate her innocent soul, and remain with her forever. No intricate subjects in the remote past for her; banish 110 History as a Basis of Faith. from her presence the Dantes and the Shakespeares, the sophists and magicians of the old age of the world. Put away, still more inexorably, historical romances, that per- nicious literature which one can never unlearn, and which makes us insensible to genuine history forever after. She should have the world’s nursery song, the Iliad and Odyssey; the best book of all for a young mind—itself young too, but so wise ! Furthermore, in order to know which books are suited to her, you must classify them according to the quality of light that illumines and colors them. The literature of every age seems to correspond to some hour of the day; Herodotus and Homer everywhere reflect the morning, and it prevails in all the memorials of Greece; the Aurora seems always to smile upon its monuments, everywhere is diffused a transpa- rency, a strange serenity, a classic joyfulness, which wins and delights the heart. The Indian dramas and poems, modern in comparison with the Vedas, possess a thousand beauties to charm the imagina- tion of the child and entrance her young girl’s heart. But I am in no haste for those; they are all teeming with the ener- vating heats of mid-day—a world of ravishing illusions dreamed in the shades of enchanted forests. To her happy lover, I will leave the voluptuous pleasure of reading Sakountala to her in some bower of flowers. It is at evening or at night that the greater part of the Bible seems to have been written ; all those terrible questions which torture human reason are therein laid down harshly and with savage crudeness. The alienation of man from God, of the son from the father, the fearful problem of the Origin of Evil, and all those perplexities of the latest-born people of Asia,—I would forbear from too early agitating a young heart with these. Of what possible use, forsooth, could it be, to read to her the lamentations of David in the dark- ness, beating his breast, torn with anguish for the murder of Uriah ? History as a Basis of Faith. 111 Strong wine for men, and milk for babes. I am old and almost worn out; the sacred book is for such as I. But in it man falls, and rises but to fall again—how many, many times! how can J explain all that to my dear innocent? May she long be ignorant of the strife of the homo duplex! It is not that the Bible presents the enervating sensuality to be found in the mystics of the Middle Ages, but for her it is too violent —ever disturbed, and without rest. Another consideration which would make me hesitate to allow her the Bible too soon, is that hatred of Nature which the Jews evince throughout. They evidently fear from it the seductions of Egypt or Babylon. But whatever the cause, it invests their writings with a negative, critical character, a gloomy austerity, which, moreover, is not always pure: a state of feeling exactly opposed to that which I wish for our child, who should be the incarnation of innocence, joy, and serenity; full of sympathy with Nature, and especially with the animals, to which the Jews cruelly gave a base name. Rather may my little one be possessed by the tender sentiment of the glorious East, which blesses all life ! Daughter, let us read together—in that bible of light, the Zend-Avesta—the ancient and sacred lamentation of the Cow, appealing to man and reminding him of her gifts. Let us read those powerful lines, ever true and living, in which man acknowledges what he owes to the companions of his toil, the strong bull, the watchful dog, the good mother Earth, The Soil is not insensible, and what she says to the husbandman will endure for ever. (Zend. ii. 284.) Be pure that you may be strong, be strong that you may be fruitful, is the whole meaning of that system of law—one of the most humane, most harmonious, that God has given to man. Every morning before light, while the tiger still prowls, two 112 History as a Basis of Faith. comrades go forth,—a man and his dog. We are speaking of the primitive dog, that colossal mastiff without which the land would then have’ been uninhabitable, a creature at once friendly and formidable, which alone could overcome monsters. One that was exhibited before Alexander strangled a lion in his presence. — Man had then no weapon but the short, heavy sword, such as is depicted on monuments, with which, face to face, breast to breast, he stabbed the lion. Every day, protected by his faithful dog, he breaks the land ; he sows it with good seed, waters it, and tills it with the plough ; he refreshes it with fountains, and his own heart is refreshed with the beneficent work of Law: so he returns from it sanctiffed. The companion of this noble life of toil and danger, woman, his efficient wife, the. mistress of his house, receives him at the threshold, and restores him with food from her own hand: he eats what she gives him, and allows her to nourish him like a child, for she knows everything,—the virtues of all plants, those which give health, and those which cheer the heart. Here woman is a magician, a queen; she subdues even the conqueror of lions. That world of ancient Persia was a virginal world, fresh as the dew before dawn. I can almost feel the circulation through it, of those forty thousand subterranean canals of which Herodotus speaks—hidden veins, which re-animated the earth, and snatched living water from the thirst of the burn- ing sun, to refresh the longing lips of innumerable roots, and gladden the heavy hearts of trees! Pallas.—Reason. 113 XI. PALLAS.— REASON. My dear child, you have as yet hardly been in the galleries of sculpture; your mother thinks them too cold, and we have always preferred to ascend to the upper story of the Louvre, to the warm, breathing world of pictures. And yet, espe- cially in, the summer, it is a place of sublime repose, of silence, where one may meditate and study better than in the museum above. To-day, while her duties detain your mother at home, let us, together, make a pilgrimage to that solemn country of the dead. Nations and Schools are not classified here as in the picture- gallery. The pure and lofty antiques are too often found side by side with the works of the Decadence. There is no con- fusion, however. So proud, so sublime, so simple are the true children of Greece, that even in the midst of Romans— emperors and senators—it is they who are glorious, who triumph,—the Greeks, who seem masters of the world. The low passions which characterize the busts of the Empire (the Agrippas, the Vitelliuses, etc.) had no part in their noble pre- decessors. A sublime serenity is the attribute of these sons of the ideal; on their brows is the same reflection with which Aurora gilds the dome of the Acropolis of Athens, while their deep eyes denote not soft revery, but subtile intuition, and masculine reason, You have read Plutarch’s Lives, and you seek here for the great dead, the objects of your preference; but those interest- ing and romantic biographies of the Decadence afford an idea quite opposed to that of the genius of antiquity. They pro- claim the Hero to enthrone and deify him; on the other hand, the glory of the Greek world consisted in being a heroic peo- ple, where there were, nevertheless, no heroes—where no one man was a hero, and yet all were. By physical and mental 114 Pallas.—Reason. discipline every citizen reached the perfection of his beauty, and attained the heroic climax, so as closely to resemble the gods. By an incessant activity, by contests, by discussions in the forum and the schools, by the theatre, by festivals with games and combats, the Greek evolved everything strong and beautiful in his nature, and moulded himself unwearyingly to the likeness of Apollo and Hercules, borrowing the strength of the one, the graceful elegance and lofty melody of the other, or the meditative faculty of the Minerva of Athens. Were all the Greeks born beautiful? It would be absurd to suppose so; but they knew how to make themselves beau- tiful.. “Socrates was born a very satyr. But within and without he so transformed himself by this sculpture of rea- son, of virtue and devotion, he so improved his face, that at last a god looked through it, by whom the Phaedon is illumined.” Let us enter this large hall, at the farther end of which stands the colossal statue of Melpomene, and, without going so far, let us stop a moment before this figure of Pallas. It is a sculpture of Roman times, but copied from a Greek Pal- las, perhaps from that of Phidias. The face wears precisely the same expression as the well-known faces of Pericles and The- mistocles; that expression—to name it aright—is thought, wisdom, or rather reflection. To reflect is to turn one’s thought back upon itself, to take it for its own object, to look at it as in a mirror. Thus it will apparently be doubled, so that the thought gazing fixedly upon itself will expand and develop itself, by the analysis of language, or by the inner speech of.dumb reason. The lofty genius of Greece did not consist in the ability of a Ulysses or a Themistocles, who. made her mistress of Asia, but in this invention of the process of reasoning, which made the Greeks the great teachers for all time to come. . Pallas.- -Reason. 115 Poetic and prophetic intuition, the Oriental process, so sub- lime in the Jewish writings, followed a no less thorny path, full of mists and mirage. It was arbitrary, besides, depend- ing on the wholly involuntary chance of inspiration. For this obscure process, Greece substituted a vigorous method of seeking and finding, of coming with certainty into the open day, by ways known to all, where one may pass and repass, and make a thorough exploration. Man thus becomes his own architect, and the builder of his own destiny—no particular man but any man whosoever—not the elect, nor the prophet, nor the special favorite of God. With this art of reasoning, Athens gave to all the world an instrument of equality. Until then there had been no connecting link. There were blind bursts of emotion, and attempts at reflection, but that speedily came to nought; all was unconnected and fortuitous —nothing regular. Until then all progress was by fits and starts; no true his- tory of the improvement of the human race has been possible. Asia possesses little of the historical element; her scanty annals afford but isolated facts, from which one can draw no conclusion. Indeed, what conclusion can we draw from events ordered by fate, and uncontrolled by wisdom ? But from the day that reasoning became an art, a science, from the day that the virgin Pallas gave birth to the faculty of deduction and comparison, in its clear form, there has existed a regular, uninterrupted descent for human works. The stream flowed on, and has never stopped—from Solon to Papinian, from Socrates to Descartes, from Archimedes to Newton. In you, as in us all, my child, this great power; it is only necessary to cultivate it. I do not ask you to apply yourself to the most abstract subjects, to translate Newton, 116 Pallas.—Reason. for instance, like a celebrated woman of the last century; I do not ask you to teach the higher mathematics to a circle of attentive men and respectful pupils, as I saw a lady do at Granville, in 1859; but I should be very happy if, in the misfortunes which may cloud your life, you could find distrac- tion in those pure and exalted regions. THe love of the beautiful is so indigenous to the heart of woman, that to feel herself growing more beautiful will console her for anything. Purity, nobleness, the elevation of a life turned wholly toward the true, is a recompense for the loss of all earthly happi- ness. Jt may be that even that would no longer be remem- bered. We have had an example of this in an admirable child, the young Emilia, daughter of Manin. She had early suffered the heaviest sorrows,—the loss of her mother, the ruin of her father, and the fearful tragedy of Venice, the results of which fell upon her; exile and poverty, and the gloomy life of northern towns, completed her desolation. But the most terrible result was, that this suffering image of the martyr- dom of Italy, who endured all its horrors, was subject to the agonizing paroxysms of a cruel nervous malady. Ah! through all this that young daughter of grief kept her mind serene and elevated, loving abstract purity—algebra and geo- metry! She so sustained her father by this sublime serenity, that he consulted her in everything, and even after he had lost her acted as she would have advised. “I think,” said he to me, speaking of a certain patriotic scheme, “that my daughter would have approved it.” _Is there any difference between God and Reason? It would be impious to believe it. And of all the forms of Eter- nal Love (beauty, fascination, power), no doubt Reason is the first, the most exalted. It is through Reason that Divine love possesses harmony and the order which blesses—benefi- Andrea del Sarto’s “ Charity.”. 117 cent, benevolent order; and though she appears cold, she is, nevertheless, loving. : We shall not always live to love and protect you; perhaps like other women, you will be alone in the world. Well, let your father’s heart appoint you a protectress, a grave and faithful guardian who will never fail you—I vow and dedicate my darling to the Virgin of Athens—to Reason ! XII. ANDREA DEL SARTO’S “CHARITY.” Tue attentive reader, I doubt not, has been able to seize upon the double thread of the methods I have pursued in the three last chapters, methods equally rigid, although one seemed to respect and caress Nature, and the other to contradict her. From the day when my little girl, on the delicate ground between two seasons of life, was in her turn attacked by that delicious malady which is only love, I have successively em- ployed two medicines, not to eradicate, but to change it. I would not cheat love, for which I have that tender respect that we owe to all the good things of God, but extend it, satisfy it better than it could satisfy itself, ennoble it, and elevate it to worthier objects. The reader has seen that at the moment of the change— towards fourteen, or rather a little before, when I saw it approaching—I made use of what might be termed homeo- pathic remedies, balancing and opposing like with like. I 118 -Andrea del Sarto’s “Charity.” gave as a counterpoise to the sexual emotion, the maternal passion, and the care of little children. But in the years which have followed, with allopathic art I have filled her mind with new studies, with pure and quiet reading. In the pleasing variety of travels and histories I have taught her to find for herself the solid moral basis on which her life is to rest—the oneness of man’s faith, in duty and in God. She has seen God in nature, she sees him in history; she perceives in eternal love the link between those two worlds which she has studied apart—witli what deep and tender feel- ing! But have I not created danger here, and will not this young loving heart grow bewildered, and under the guise of purity, in a higher sphere, pursue a whirlwind of disorders no less dangerous ? As to this, everything depends upon the mother. At the first shock of nature, the tender, troubled child, was wholly in her mother’s arms; and found therein not only warm caresses but dreams too. A woman is so moved when her child be- comes a woman, that she herself becomes a child; she fears for her adored treasure, now tottering and frail; she prays and weeps, and easily falls back upon the wealneee of a mys- ticism by which both may be enervated. And then what will become of me? Of what use that I have given this flower healthful and strengthening waters, if a weak mother is to keep it sickly with milk and with tears, and what is worse, dosed with quackeries ? Of all corrupting romances the worst are the mystical books wherein soul talks with soul in the dangerous hours of an artificial twilight. She believes she is growing in grace, and she goes on languishing, softening, preparing herself for all human weaknesses. The rough, harsh, and violent agitation of the Jewish writings, is sickly and feverish in those of the middle ages; how much more so in their modern imitations, so disastrously equivocal! My young daughter, who from year to year, by an entirely opposite path, has ascended to Andrea del Sarto’s “ Charity.” 119 the idea of God (of God strong, living, and creating), has less to fear than others; but it is just at this moment that I intend to arm her; to protect her young head with something to put dreams to flight—the luminous steel helmet of the true virgin, Pallas. The. mental dialogue I would begin in her is not at all that of dangerous revery, but the rigid questionings of thought, fully awakened, with thought itself. There, higher than reasoning she perceives Reason. Above the spheres of life which she has traversed, she sees the crystal sphere, where the Zdea in full light has penetrated through and through. And so beautiful and puré is this, that she loves and adores Purity for its own sake. This is the love which in her has transfigured love, and this is how I have defended her heart. But will this always avail? I must not so flatter myself. Poor child! it is not her fault; it is nature’s, who every day enriches her with strength, embellishes her with a luxury of life, and makes a magic charm of her. A maiden of pure and lofty heart, of upright and enlightened will, she seems by that very purity to offer a worthier prize to the imperious power. Her eyes and .her thoughts are on heaven, her heart intent on serious subjects, her virtuous mind which can con- trol itself shuns no abstraction. But it often happens that in the very midst of these noble studies some one disturbs her (who, indeed?) ; her cheek suddenly flushes, her beautiful eyes wander and grow dim—a wave of life has ascended and flooded her young bosom. She is a woman—so what can one do? she radiates all around her a seductive electricity. Under the forests of the equator, love, in myriads of creatures, burst forth from flame itself, through the magic of the winged fires that transfigure the night. Naive revelations these, but not more so than the timid innocent charm of a maiden, thinking to conceal all. A divine light emanates from her involuntarily, a voluptuous halo; and at the very moment when she blushes at her own beauty, does she diffuse around her the intoxicating perfume of love. 120 Andrea del Sarto’s “Charity.” “O my dear child, I cannot, I will not, leave you thus! You would be consumed even as ataper. With that danger- ous fever which would destroy you, we must blend another to dissipate it. A devouring power possesses you, but I will give it food; anything is better; my darling, than to see you pine alone. Receive from me the cordial, one flame to quench another; take (it is your father who administers) bitterness and sorrow. “Sheltered by our love, shut in with your own thoughts and your studies, you know but little of the world’s labors, of the immensity of its wretchedness. Save a glance at a crying child, so quickly comforted, you have never yet suspected the numberless griefs here below. You were weak and delicate ; and your mother and I did not dare to excite you with so many heart-rending emotions; but to-day we should be culpa- ble not to tell you all.” So I take her with me, and lead her boldly through that sea of tears which flows by our very side without attracting our notice. I tear away the curtain, regardless of the physical disgust, the false delicacy : Look, look, my child! behold the reality! In the presence of such things a woman must be endowed with marvellous powers of egotistic abstraction, to pursue her dreams and her personal idyl—her idle sail over the stream of Love, whose banks are gay with flowers. She blushes for her ignorance, is troubled, and weeps. And then, recovering herself, blushes for weeping instead of acting. The flame of God burns brightly within her, and henceforth she gives us no peace. All the powers of love, the warmth of her young blood, enlisted in charity, rouse her to activity, to enthusiasm; she is impatient, unhappy that she can do so little. How shall we calm her now? it is her - mother’s task to direct her, watch her, restrain her ; for with this blind enthusiasm, she may precipitate herself into un- known dangers. The intoxication of charity and its heroic fire, that ravish- ing passion of maidens overfiowing with love, has never been Andrea del Sarto’s “ Charity.” 121 described ; but it has “been painted once. An Italian exile, touched with gratitude for the charity of France, bestowed upon us this inestimable gift, the most fervid picture, I think, in the Museum of the Louvre. Alas! why is it there among so many common works of art, that inspiration of exalted sanctity! And how altered too! Barbarians! hea- thens! thanks to you, this divine wonder has almost perished on the canvas. But in my glowing memory it is always blazing ; and to my last moment, more than any other saintly image, shall it have my devotion. The following, without alteration, is the hasty informal note I wrote on the 21st of May last, when I saw it for the last time: “A work of infinite boldness, without conventionality or deference to rule. In it we see that terrible period, of the catastrophe of Italy. One must have died many times to be able to describe or paint like this. “The fair, full breast is that of a virgin, not a aie too are more timid. The one before us has not been subdued ; she has nothing dodging about her, she wavers neither to dh right hand nor the left—has no fear, no doubt. She only looks on those poor starving wretches, and that is enough; she feeds them. (Here we must explain, that at this period a man cross- ing the Alps encountered an immense troop of. thousands of children who had lost their parents; they were browsing on all fours, guided by an old woman.) “ Before this horrible spectacle of misery and filth, another would have wept, but would have fled. She, young, heroic, knowing neither fear nor disgust, opens wide her arms, and takes them to her bosom. “ One is at her feet, all haggard, his ribs distinctly visible ; he is tired, exhausted, and can go no further ; with weariness and sleefiness he has fallen on a stone. As she has but two arms 6 122 Andrea del Sarto’s “ Charity.” she holds but two of the children; one she has placed at her bosom, her luxurious bosom, turgid with milk. He is in per- fect happiness, and his greedy, gluttonous mouth (for he has been famished so long!) presses the beautiful fountain, red with life and love, with pure and generous blood. “With how proud a heart, with what noble bounty, she pours out her milk! A naive circumstance betrays the charm- ing precipitation with which she took up the starving child, She is not a nurse ; soshe has placed him to her breast just as he came, holding him on her left arm, which she has passed under him with tender strength, without ever thinking of the. right way. But how could one laugh at that? No more than he could smile at the bold negligence with which the young saint, wholly absorbed in her passionate employment, has put on her capawry. The other child, which she holds on her right arm to her covered bosom, is larger, stronger, more decent—I was about to say more corrupt. He has a girdle about his waist, and is not dressed like a boy, but already has the cringing, fawning air of a young beggar ; his sharp trem- bling lips seem to utter a harsh, piercing prayer through his clenched teeth. He holds in his hands, I think, some bad, sour grapes; but is in haste to forget in the pleasure of the rich sweet milk of the woman, that bitter food. He will not be kept waiting long; his comrade has imbibed so much that he is swollen like a leech. “‘ Near by, on the ground, is a chafing-dish with a fire of red- hot coals and embers—but so cold in comparison with the fire that glows in her heart! Her form too glows, and she has the grand calmness of strength, a firm heroic attitude, a throne in the grace of God.” / The Revelation of Heroism. 128 XIII. THE REVELATION OF HEROISM. FRorst1, in his Education of Children, suggests a very happy expedient. He requires that they be reared independently of their teacher, by a lovely and accomplished young lady, such as a man would desire for his wife. How grateful we should be to the children! He advises that this young girl shall visit the schools often, to assist the teacher and assume her qualities. The teacher must be careful, loving, intelligent, with that un- wearying patience that love alone can give. The young women who assist her should be like her, or gradually become so, by means of that which renders a woman capable of everything— the love of children, the maternal instinct. Must they be per- fect? In this way, at least, they will become so. Happy children, to be in such pleasant hands! And how much more so, indeed, the lover to whose lot shall fall the divinest of the gifts of heaven. Madame Necker is of the same opinion. She thinks we can form the girl into an admirable wife by thus first making a mother of her. How much these poor little things who have nothing, can bestow onthe young lady! First, a knowledge of life, with all its realities and miseries; for they will show her the world as it is. They will strengthen her character, and relieve her of her false delicacy. She will not be the haughty prude, the fasti- dious fine lady, that we meet every day. She will become skilful and bold, will feel the sacredness of humanity, and the dignity of charity; she will have none of the silly scruples of those who have nothing better; calmly, and with dignity, willshe per- form the most menial offices—feeding, bathing, dressing, and undressing, if need be, her innocents. 124 The Revelation of Heroism. A thoughtful girl, who has thus, at the same time, both the ideal of study and the reality of life, will be strengthened by both, and derive from them a correct judgment. When she is older, she will not know a gentleman by his yellow gloves, or his horses and carriages, but by his actions, by his heart and his goodness. She will love only seriously, paying little attention to externals, but penetrating to the depths of her lover’s character, for what he does, and of what he is capable. Suppose that by chance a young man enters and discovers her with her mother, engaged in her holy duties. The chil- dren, a little frightened at the advent of so fine a gentleman, cling close and cluster around her, behind her chair, on her knees, even under the folds of her dress, where, feeling safe, they peep out and show their pretty heads. She, though surprised and smiling, blushes a little; do you fancy she will take refuge behind her mother? No, she is herself a mother to them, busied in comforting them, more concerned for them than for her visitor. It is he who is embarrassed ; he feels like kneel- ing before them to kiss their hands. He does not address the daughter, but approaches the mother: “ Ah! madam, what a pleasant sight, what a charming scene! I cannot tell you how my heart thanks you for it.” Then to the young lady: “He would be happy, mademoiselle, who could aid you! But, mon Dieu! what could I do?” She, quite at her ease, in no wise disconcerted, replies: “That is easy, sir. Most of these children are orphans; find some good people without children, who would be willing to adopt this little one. He is five years old. I cannot comfort him; he wants a mother, a real mother; I have tried my best, but I am too young, too far from the age of his own mother whom he has lost.” There are many men of the world, who feel these things for a moment, who admire as artists the grace of expression The Revelation of Heroism. 125 or attitude the young girl may have displayed; but there are not many who take them into their hearts and preserve their permanent and lasting impression. Life is variable and restless ; it drifts them far away. At most, they only say in the even- ing: “I saw a charming thing this morning, mademoiselle—a veritable tableau, after Andrea del Sarto—the prettiest sight !” She very well knows what such admirers are worth, and the slight value to be placed on their fickle emotions. The more she retires into the sanctum sanctissimum of the family, the happier she is in it, the less she cares to leave it. Every time she catches a glimpse of the world, she feels more cheerfully the pleasantness of her own little nest. Little, very little! yet human life is complete within it, in that graceful equilibrium of a mother ennobling by her heart the humblest cares, and of an earnest father, whose hidden tenderness is often betrayed in spite of himself. At such passionate demonstrations the young girl quivers, and is even more deeply touched by his care to transmit to her every day whatever he has in himself of good and great. As a woman, she is happy in thus discovering the inner life of aman. She did not know her father, at least never so well as now; she saw him every day, and listened to his teachings, and his emphatic words; but she did not know the secret and best part of his nature. Every man becomes what circum- stances, the force of precedents, and education, the necessities of business, may chance to make him. Much must be sacri- ficed to position, to the needs of Family; and thus the inner man, often very different and far nobler, lies stifled under all. Amid the monotony of every-day life, wherein it sleeps, a vague sadness betrays the mute complaint of the other, the better self. What a pleasant awaking is it, then, and how charming, when a young soul, knowing nothing of our miseries, appeals to these hidden powers, to this captive poetry, and asks their assistance; when all absorbed in her family, and afraid of the world, she turns alone to her father, 126 f The Revelation of Heroism. and seems to say to him: “I listen to thee, I have faith only in thee!” Doubtless this sublime moment is the noblest, the sweetest experience of paternity. A child in docility, she isa woman in ardor, and in the eager. tenderness with which she receives instruction. How aptly she comprehends everything good and noble! He himself hardly recognises her: ‘‘ What!” says he, “is this my little one who but lately scarcely reached my knee, and who used to say, ‘carry me!’” His heart is truly moved. Let him but speak at this moment, let him but speak, and, oh! he will be eloquent! JI am quite sure of that, J have not the slightest doubt of that. Let us take advantage of these beautiful hours, these pre- cious téte-d-tétes. I see the two walking now under the majestic elms that inclose their little garden. They step with a quick firm tread, faster than one would expect in this hot month of July; but they keep time with the beating of their hearts 4nd the rapidity of their thoughts. She, knowing her father’s taste, has placed in her black hair some blades of grain and blue blossoms. We will listen to their talk, for the subject is a grave one, the question of right and justice. For a long time the young girl has been prepared to understand bint; in his- tory she soon recognised the unanimity of nations in the idea of justice; in mighty Rome, her father showed her a world of right. But here it is no longer a question of study, of his- tory, of science, but a question of life itself. He hopes that in her impending crisis, in the love which will come of it (violent perhaps, and blind), she may preserve the light of justice, of wisdom, and of reason, At heart, woman is our judge; her influence, her fascination, if it is unjust and capri- cious, is only our despair. To-morrow she will judge, this beautiful girl. In the most modest form, in a few low words to her mother, she will draw tears from one who may never weep again, who perchance will die for that. She is so well prepared both by the example of her mother, and the lessons of her father, by the atmosphere of reason in The Revelation of Heroism. 127 which she has lived, that she will be less liable than others to the caprices of her sex. But of the generality, we may say with Proudhon, “ Woman is the desolation of the just.” Say to her, for instance, if she loves; “ Of course, you deem this favored man, the most worthy of your lovers? You have discovered in him something good and great?” And she will answer frankly, “No; I chose him because he pleased me.” In religion she is the same. She makes God in her own image, a God of preference and caprice, who saves whosoever has pleased him. Love seems to her all the freer for falling on the unworthy, on one who has no merit to compel love. In feminine theology, God would say: “I love thee, because thou art a sinner, because thou deservest nothing. I have no reason for loving thee, but it is pleasant to me to forgive.” Oh! how thankful I am that her father has taught her jus- tice! for that teaches her true love. I thank him in the name of all the loving hearts who will soon be agitated by her, who will hang upon her youthful wisdom, and wait for the decree of her lips. Let them know indeed that, thus enlightened, only to the most worthy, to the deserving, to the just man, above all to the man of noble deeds, in whom her father teaches her to recognise the lofty beauty of heroic justice, will she belong. What is this justice? It is the right beyond the right, and seemingly opposed to it; the injustice of Decius, who discovered that it was just for the best man to die for all, is the deeper mystery of devotion and sacrifice. Never until now had her father spoken to her of her own time, of the great nineteenth century, greatest in invention, and also one of the richest in heroic devotion. To-day, he anveils to her that sacred bleeding side of the world, of which she has lived in such total ignorance; he repeats to her the Golden Legend—of the martyrs dead and living. A great day for her young heart !—and how it transfigures 128 The Revelation of Heroism. her! How radiant this virgin, and who would not accept her now for a symbol of the future ? But no, she is a woman, and she turns pale; her self-control cannot restrain a tear; one orient pearl drops from her beau- tiful eyes, Ye are rewarded, O ye heroes, who dying and bequeathing to your country all your dreams, said, “In the future, virgins shall weep for us.” But enough, enough for one day.” A gentle woman advances slowly, smiling and interrupting them. The mother is happy to see the father and daughter so closely united; she looks on them, and blesses them, and says: “ Ah! my poor little one! this will be thy happiest love.” But will she love elsewhere? He has captured a glorious prize, this father, master, pontiff, who makes revelations of heroism to a young, heroic heart, and fathoms its lowest depths. One cannot talk much of heroes without being him- self a hero for the moment. Such indeed does he appear to the child who hangs upon his words; he would paint his ideal, but she sees but him. ‘We know the enthusiastic love of Mme. de Staél for her father; and I have no doubt that that young gir!, then all nature, all passion, powerful, eloquent, divine, exalted him above himself. He was great in her eyes, and that made him so—or at least contributed to it. Commonplace before and after, but in that solemn hour, young, bold, transfigured, he arose to the noble idea of ’89—the infinite hope of equality. He might ¢hange, he might fall, and she too, under his influ- ence. No matter—the child’s dream, one moment realized, took the measure of the whole world. This is a strong tie then, so strong that all others seem weak and insufficient. I have seen other daughters, less The Revelation of Heroism. 129 known, but not less admirable, in whom this first affection seemed to have closed the heart against all others. The sweetness and delicacy of the close intimacy they enjoyed in the filial relation seemed attainable in no other. One had a father nearly blind, and she was his eyes; he saw through her, she loved through him. For another, the rest of the world had been destroyed, her father existed alone; she declared that with him she would welcome the profoundest solitude at either pole. ‘ Talk not to me,” said she, “ of the divorce that men cal! marriage!” For our own daughter there remains to us the serious duty of warning her of the common fate. Alas! our pure and tender union can be but transient. Nature urges us on, and does not allow love to fall back upon itself. It is a painful task to tear heart from heart, to calm, to regulate the naive impulses of the child, and lead it on to wis- dom: “My dear child, in your beautiful season of eager and radiant life, which vivifies all things, one thing escapes you which you must sometimes recall—death ! “Our undying love can avail you nothing; your mother and I must soon leave you. What, if loving me too well, you should wed, in me, grief? “Of late, the intimacy of this normal initiation, the deep joy I have felt in revealing to you the elements of man’s greatness, have too fondly enraptured your heart, my child, and identified it with mine. You have seen me in your filial illusion, young with the eternal youth of the heroes I have described, and at the same time mature, calm, wise, with the gift you call the sweetness of autumn. All this, my daughter, is not what God designs for you. For you is the beginning, not the end. You require the brave, fierce strength of those who have much to do, in whom time may do its work, to soften and ameliorate. Their present defects are often excellences in the future. Your gentleness is only too inclined to cherish the gentleness of a father. I wish for you—and may God grant you—the energy of a husband. 6* 130 The Revelation of Heroism. “At this very time you are already the beginning of a wife; another initiation awaits you, and other duties. Wife and mother, wise friend, and universal cqmforter, you are created to be the happiness and the salvation of many. Take heart, then, my daughter, and the cheerful courage one feels in marching to duty. Though my heart may suffer in teach- ing you these sterner laws of life, it yet bears itself proudly. * Does the lover exist whom we would desire for you? I know not; but whatever happens, love will not fail you. The maternal is the purest love, and you will be a mother to all. All shall recognise in you the most benign reflection of Provi- dence.” Boox JI.—Woman IN THE FamILy. i, THE WOMAN WHO WILL LOVE MOST.—A DIFFERENT RACE. Brrore pursuing further the young girl’s destiny, which in our first book we have been tracing, let us take a general view of marriage, and the physiological questions of race and amalgamation. Love is the mediator of the world, the redeemer of all human races. Love means peace, harmony, unity, and is the great peace-maker. Political hostilities, discords, contrary in- terests, all these are as nothing to it; it cancels and overcomes them; or, even more, it laughs and mocks at them. Diversity indeed is the very thing it prefers; contrast is a seduction, the unknown a charm, a mystery which it would fathom; the con- trariety which might be expected to blunt, only whets the edge of its desire. Every one who has been in Berne, has seen the portrait of Magdalena Nageli, with the huge chamois gloves—a robust woman and a fruitful mother, who was beloved for her great strength. Though daughter of a patrician of Berne, she was engaged in the family washing, at a fountain with her servants, when there passed by a young noble, of a house always hostile to hers—an hereditary enmity, like that of the Montagus and Capulets in Romeo and Juliet; and the young man lingered to 132 The Woman who will Love Most. gaze at the beautiful girl, as she clapped the linen with a hand of iron and wrung it with an arm of steel. He saw that there would be born of her a race of men as strong as bears ; so he hastened at once to his enemy’s palace, and implored him for his friendship and his daughter, because he despaired ‘of ever finding another woman so vigorously framed. The most energetic races on earth have sprung from a union of opposite, or seemingly opposite elements: for in- stance, the blending of the white man with the black woman, which produces the mulatto, a race of extraordinary vigor ; or on the contrary, of identical elements; for example, the Persians and the Greeks, who married their near relatives. Which is precisely the way in which race-horses are improved ; they are permitted to breed only with their own stock, so as to refine their blood. In the first case, the principle consists in the fact that there is so much more attraction between opposite; the egress adores the white man. In the second case, it proceeds from the perfect harmony of likes, which co-operate. The native speciality accumulates and increases from mar- riage to marriage. The races deemed inferior, only appear so from their need of a culture contrary to ours, and especially from their need of love. How touching are they in this aspect, and how well they merit a return from the favored races, who find in them an infinite source of physical regenera- tion and youth! The river thirsts for the clouds, the desert for the river, the black woman for the white man. She of all others is the most loving, the most generating; and this not only because of her youthful blood, but, we must also admit, from the rich- ness of her heart. She is loving among the loving, good among the good (ask the travellers whom she has so often saved). Goodness is creation, it is fruitfulness, it is the very benediction of aholy act. The fact that this woman is so fruit. ful, I attribute to her treasures of tenderness, to that ocean of goodness which permeates her heart. The Woman who will love Most. 133, “Africa is a woman; her races are feminine,” says, very truly, Gustavus d’Eichthall. The revelation of Africa in the red race of Egypt was in the reign of the great Isis (Osiris was secondary). In many of the black tribes of Central Africa, the women rule; and they are as intelligent as they are amia- ble and kind. We see this in Hayti, where they not only im- provise charming little songs for their festivals, inspired by their affections, but in business operations solve very compli- cated mental problems. It was a pleasure to me to learn that in Hayti, through liberty, comfort, and intelligent culture, the negress is disap- pearing, and that without amalgamation.. She is becoming the true black woman, with straight nose and thin lips; even her hair is changing. The coarse and bloated features of the negro on the coasts of Africa are (like the swollen hippopo- tamus) an effect of his burning climate, which at certain seasons is drenched with warm floods. These floods fill the valleys with refuse, which decays there; and the fermentation swells and puffs up everything, just as dough rises in an oven. But there is nothing of all this in the dryer climates of Cen- tral Africa. The frightful anarchy of petty wars, and the slave-trade, which desolate the coasts, contribute not a little to this ugliness; and it is the same in the American States under the influence of slavery. Even there, where she remains a negress, with no refinement, the black woman is still very - beautiful. She possesses the charm of supple youth, which the Greek beauty, formed by gymnastics and always a lit- tle masculinized, never had. She may scorn not only the odious Hermaphrodite, but the muscular beauty of the crouch- ing Venus (in the Jardin des Tuileries), The black is avery different "woman from the proud ladies of Gréece; she is essentially young in blood, in heart, and in body—of gentle, child-like humility, never sure of pleasing, ready to do any- thing in order to displease less. No tyranny wearies her obedience; annoyed by her face, she is in no wise comforted by her perfect form, so full of touching languor, and elastic 134 The Woman who will love Most. freshness. She throws at your feet what you were about to adore; she trembles and begs your pardon—she is so grateful for the pleasure she bestows! She loves, and her whole heart flows into her warm embrace. Only let her be loved, and she will do aryehine learn any- thing. In the black race, the woman must first be elevated, and through love she will elevate the man and the child. But for her there must be a system of education entirely contrary to ours. Cultivate in her first, what she already has so richly, the sense of rhythm (dancing, music, etc.) ; and through the art of design lead her on to reading, to the sciences, and the agricultural arts. She will be in raptures with nature as soon as she learns of it. When the earth is made known to her— so beautiful, so good, so womanly—she will fall in love with it, and with more energy than one would expect from her cli- mate, she will bring about a marriage between the earth and man, Africa had only the red Isis; America shall have the black Isis, a glowing female genius, to impregnate nature and reanimate exhausted races. Such is the virtue of the black blood, that wherever a drop of it falls, everything revives; no more old age—a young and puissant energy, it is the very fountain of youth. In South America and elsewhere, we behold more than one noble race languishing, drooping, dying; why is that so when they have life at their very doors? The Spanish Republicans, true nobles and perfect gentlemen, were better masters than the other colo- nists; they were generously the first to abolish slavery. Ah! in return, beneficent Africa can restore them to strength and life. Observe this African race—so gay, so kind, so loving. From the day of its resurrection, at its first contact, by love, with the white race, it furnished the latter with an extraordinary combination of faculties which give force, in a man of inex- haustible powers—a man, did I say? rather an element, like an inextinguishable volcano or a great American river. How long was it without the rapturous gift of improvization, which for the last fifty years it has possessed? No matter, for all The Woman who will love Most. 135 that it affords the best machinist, and the most vivid dramatist since Shakespeare. We find an unknown source of beauty in the black race. The red rose, which was formerly the only hue admired, has, we must confess, but little variety. Thanks to the art which combines, we have the numberless tea-roses now, with their thousand shades,—and others still more delicate, veined or tinted with faint blue. Our great painter, Prud’hon, has painted nothing more lovingly than the beautiful dark woman in the hall of the Louvre. She is a little in the shade, like a mystery unveiling itself. Her beauty is seen as through a cloud. Her lovely eyes are not large, but deep, and full of expression. The spectator, who perhaps sees in her what is in his own heart, regards her as Night shrouded in Passion. A dark and glowing picture! And yet I have seen one somewhat clearer, and even prettier. Last winter, visiting an eminent Haytian, as distinguished in literature as in business, I was received, in his absence, by a young lady, as timid as she was charming, whose rare beauty took me by surprise. A scarcely perceptible shade of delicious lilac threw over her roses a mysterious magical charm, quite indescribable. Pre- sently she blushed, and the fire of her eyes would have dazzled the two worlds. A thousand honors to the black France! for so would I name Hayti, since her kindly people so love her who oppressed their fathers. Receive my vows, O youthful state! and may we afford thee protection in atonement for the past, and develop thy free genius, the genius of that cruelly calumniated race whose sole civilized representative in this world thou art. By an equal title thou art‘representative of the genius of woman. Through thy charming women, so loving and so intelligent, must thou cultivate thyself and organize thy schools. Such tender mothers will, I am sure, become admirable instructors, A rigid normal-school for the governesses and school-teachers (especially after the delightful method of Froebel) is the insti- tution I would first desire for Hayti. 136 The Woman who will Love Most. How France has been loved! How deeply do I still mourn for the love and friendship with which the tribes of North America welcomed us—so proud and fierce a race! It is really a glory to us that those men, with the piercing eyes and the second-sight of the hunter, preferred us for their daugh- ters, and at once discerned the truth—that a Frenchman is a superior man. As a soldier he lives everywhere, and as a lover he creates everywhere. The Englishman and the German, strong and well-formed as they appear, are both-less robust and less generative ; they can do nothing with the foreigner. Ifthe English or German woman is not always at hand, following them on their jour- neys, their race dies out. Soon there will be nothing left of the English in India—no more than the Franks of Clovis among us, or the Lombards in Lombardy. The black woman’s love for us is perfectly natural ; that of the red woman, the American Indian, is more surprising. She is stern, haughty, and sombre. A Frenchman’s gaiety, some- times rather volatile, might have shocked her. Her deep pro- phetic powers could hardly be expected to consort with our joy- ous dancers, who even in the wilderness, while an eight months’ winter reigned, danced to the songs of Paris. But she knew them to be brave, she saw that they were serious, kind, loving, helpfal, fraternizing at once with her tragic warriors; and so they found favor in her eyes. If she checked the audavity of our wild scape-graces who sometimes intruded on her privacy, it was in delicate, dignified words, that did not wound. The reply of the betrothed maiden is well known. “The friend I have before my eyes prevents my seeing you.” These red women treated us like boisterous children, who are sometimes a little troublesome to their mother or their sister, but she does not love them the less. From these amours a mixed race remains—the Franco- Indians ; but they are scattered—few in number, and gra- dually dying out; the noble race is fast becoming extinct. The Woman who will Love Most. 137 In a hundred years what will be left of them? Perhaps Préault’s bust. A doleful image—ah! so very sad—which the great sculptor of tombs seized upon instinctively, with unconscious genius, and which remains to perpetuate the poor but noble woman of the race that Chateaubriand caricatured. Some ten years ago, an American speculator bethought him of exhibiting in Europe a large family of Iowas. The men were magnificent, of a proud and regal beauty—on their necks the claws of bears, significant of combats. Very strong —yet not with the great muscles of the blacksmith or the boxer, but with beautiful arms, almost like a woman’s. A child too, ten years old, was like a pretty Egyptian statue of red marble—perfect, but with a fearful gravity. You could not look on him without thinking, “That is the son of a hero.” What consoled these kings for being made a show of on a stage, like monkeys, was, I think, their latent scorn of the crowd of superfine gentlemen, who were there with their opera-glasses—volatile, restless, gesticulaters, the veritable monkeys of Europe. The only person in the party who seemed sad was a woman, the wife of a renowned warrior named “The Wolf,” and mother of the child. She had suffered much before, but how much more here! She drooped; she died. Alas! what could France offer to one of the last of those poor women who had loved France so well? Nothing, but a tomb to preserve the fire of a lost genius. Antiquity (even the Jewish) has never had, nor known, nor dreamed of anything so sad; for here we behold a superior being who has not only endured every personal misfortune and sorrow, put is accursed in not having been left to the legitimate expan- sions of his race. Hidden, but mighty grief of the American world! What with his eternal war with the wilderness and his savage contests with bears and men, the Indian has not been permitted to reveal himself fally. And then the prosaic power of old Europe laid before him, in guns and fire-water, every instrument of treachery or conflict. 138 .The Worhan who will Love Most. She looks all this in the face, this woman—like a sphynx, stern and bitter—and yet under that bitterness, ob! the heart of the mother and the wife! How gladly in the long famine of winter would she have cut bloody morsels from her own body to nourish her little one! With what joy, to save it, would she have been burned at the stake by a hostile tribe! And what unfathomable depths of love would not the hero of her choice have found in her! : One indeed felt, in gazing on her, the mysterious infinite of pride and silence she concealed. Her life was as mute as her death. All the tortures in the world would no more have drawn from her a sigh than the sting of love. She had not lost the power of speech ; she spoke as she ever did, with the thrilling expressions of the strange world, enigmatical and gloomy, that she contained within her; strange! but per- haps nothing greater in all the realm of mind, XI. WOMAN WHO WILL LOVE MOST.—THE SAME RACE, Love has its earthly plan. Its true aim is to unite, to blend all races in one universal marriage; so that from China to Ireland, from the north pole to the south, all shall be brothers, brothers-in-law, nephews—like the Scotch clans, for instance, the six thousand Campbells all cousins. It should be the same with all humanity, We should form but a single clan. A beautiful dream! but we must not yield to it too soon. In such a union the blood of all races being mingled together, suppose, which would be difficult, that it should blend—I imagine it would be very pale. A certain neutral, colorless, faded element would be the result. Very many special cha- racteristics, all charming, would be lost; and the definitive - The Woman who will’ love Mast. 139 victory of love, in that total fusion, would be fatal to love itself. ‘ An able intelligent book on the mingling of races is much needed. We must not suppose that they can be blended with impunity. An indiscriminate mingling degrades the race, or ruins it. It is only successful between sympathetic races, seemingly opposed, but not so in reality. Between the negro and the white there is no anatomical opposition, of any importance. The mixed race lives and is strong. On the contrary, between the French and English, which seem so nearly related, there is even in the skeleton a marked differ- ence. The offspring are either of short life, or dwarfed, or in their ensemble present some visible discordance. Between the French and the German the results vary con- siderably. The man finds a great charm in such a marriage. Parched, burning, of an eager mind, he enjoys by contrast the moral freshness—he finds music, an appreciation of nature, and complete amiability, which render life very pleasant to him, although perhaps a little monotonous. The child (if there is one) does not always live. Generally it is frail, but charm- ing. Rarely does it preserve the paternal fire; neither French nor German, it becomes European. I one day asked an intelligent young man, who was teach- ing some wise birds to read and calculate, if his little heroes were not raised above their kind by skilful blending, if they were not mixed? On the contrary, said he, they are of a very pure race, not impaired by combining. This set me to reflecting on our actual tendency toward the mingling of races, and the belief, often incorrect, that combin- ing, as it does, the endowments and the simple elements of both, the mixed race is necessarily superior. Among those of our great writers whom I have known, only three are of mixed race. Six are pure Frenchmen; and the three of mixed blood, being foreign, not through the father, but the grandfather, have three-fourths French ele- ment, a very strong predominance of the national sap. 140 The Woman who will love Most. One important point to consider, which may seem para- doxical, is that foreign women, of the most distant races, are easier to become acquainted with than European—especially than French women. If I marry an Oriental I can very easily foretell what my marriage will be. One can foresee and determine the Asiatic wife, through great classes—race, nation, tribe. Even in Europe, the man who marries a German woman, appropriat- ing her, transplanting her, is almost sure to have a peaceful life. The ascendancy of the French mind turns all the chances in his favor. But races in which the personality is strong, are not so safe. They say the Circassian maidens like to be sold, feeling sure of reigning wherever they go, and putting their masters under their feet. It is almost the same with the Polish, the Hunga- rian, the French women—the superior energies of Europe. They have often a masculine intellect; they marry their hus- bands, rather-than are married. So it is necessary to be acquainted with them, to study them beforehand, to know if they are women at all. The French personality is the most active, most individual, in Europe—the most complex too, and most difficult to under- stand. I speak especially of the daughters. There is less dif- ference among the men, moulded as they are by the army, by centralization, by the machinery of a quasi-identical education. Between one French woman and another the difference is immense, but between the French maiden and the French woman, as till greater difference. So, the difficulty in choosing is not slight, but the foretelling of them is. In return, when they yield, and are constant, they permit a more thorough and closer intimacy, I think, than any other European women. The English woman, an excellent wife, obeys by the letter of the law, but always remains a little obstinate, and changes but little. The German woman, so loving and gentle, wishes to belong to her husband, to assimi- late herself with him; but she is effeminate, dreamy, and in The Woman who will love Most. 141 spite of herself, fickle. The Frenchwoman brings you a prize; she reacts on you; and when she has received your thoughts most clearly, she gives you back the charm, the personal, inti- mate fragrance of her free womanly heart. One day I met, after twenty years’ absence, a Frenchman, living in a foreign country, and married there. I asked him jestingly, if he had not married some superb English rose, or a beautiful German blonde. He answered seriously, but not without vivacity, ““ Yes, Monsieur, those are very beautiful, more brilliant than ours. I compare them to that splendid fruit, which gardeners cultivate to the highest development, the magnificent pine-apple strawberry. The flavor is not wanting—it fills the mouth; one only misses the fragrance. I prefer the French woman, and southern French too; for she is the wild strawberry.” Whatever we may think of this poetical comparison of a newly married man, it remains fixed and sure that the per- sonality of the French woman is extremely powerful for good or evil. So marriages in France should be prudent, and pre- pared with serious reflection; yet it is the very country of all Europe in which marriages are most precipitate. This arises not merely from the quick calculations of interest which, once arranged, urge marriages to conclusion; it results also from the great defect of our nation—impatience. We hurry every- thing. I think the evil is increasing. In proportion as we become more earnest in business, precipitation in matters of the heart seems to increase. Our language has lost a number of elegant, graceful words which once marked the degrees and shades of love. What is left is curt and hard. The heart is not changed at bottom; but the people, jaded with wars, revolu- tions, and deeds of violence, are tempted to look in every- thing for an enterprise, a coup-de-main. The marriage of Romulus, by stratagem, would have pleased them only too well. They must have razeias; I could almost call it viola- tion by contract. Sometimes the victims weep—not always ; 142 The Woman who will love Most. they are but little astonished in these times of lotteries—lot- teries of money, of war, of pleasure, of charity—to be thus set, up in a lottery. Frequently these fortuitous marriages suddenly unmask, the very next day, an unexpected battery of irreparable evils, of ruin and ridicule, which strike full in the face. Physiologically such unions, often impossible as unions, pro- duce abortions, monsters that die or kill the mother, or render her ill for life—in short, which make a nation ugly. Morally they are still worse, for the father, who thus marries his daugh- ter, is not ignorant of the eousolation she will soon accept. Mar riage under such conditions constitutes and regulates the universality of adultery, makes intimate divorces, often thirty years of mutual distaste, and in the marriage couch a temper- ature that would freeze mercury. Our peasants were formerly firm in marrying those with whom they were best acquainted—a relative perhaps. Throughout the Middle Ages they struggled against the church, which forbade the marriage of cousins. The restric- tion, at first excessive (even to the seventh degree, and later to the fourth), no longer exists in reality. One can have dis- pensation if he likes, to marry his cousin, or his niece, or ‘the sister of his first wife. What is the result? That now, when it is easy, very few profit by it. The casuists, those false geniuses, who in almost everything have cultivated the art of finding the wrong side of good sense, say, pleasantly: “If wedded love be added to the love of kindred, there will be too much love.” History teaches precisely the contrary. Among the Hebrews, who at first allowed marriage with sisters, we see the young people, far from caring for each other, going out of the family, out of the nation—running after the daughters of the Philistines. Among the Greeks, who could marry their half-sisters, such marriages were very cold, and but seldom productive. Solon felt himself called upon to inscribe in the law that husbands should be required to remember their wives but once in a de. The Woman who will love Most. 143 cade; and the marriage with sisters was abolished. The Ro- mans married no closer than their cousins. In fact, marriage ought to be a new birth. The delightful moment when the wite first enters her bridal home, is lost to the sister. The beautiful Greek, as we see her in the marbles of the Parthenon, never entered such a house; hut was there from her birth, seated on the paternal hearth. She faithfully represented the spirit of father and mother, the old familiar traditions. She could lend herself but little to the young ideas ofher brother-husband, to the mobility of Athens. Magnificent as she was, she was somewhat tiresome. The race lost nothing by it, it was the most beautiful in the world; but love lost much, and the family was hardly renewed. But Greece cared little for that; she dreaded fecundity, and only wished to strengthen native genius, by cultivating to the highest degree the vigor of each lineage, and its pecu- liar originality. She looked—not at numbers—but simply at the hero; and she obtained him by the concentration of ener- getic races, and a marvellous increase of activity, which, in a short time, it is true, wore out and exhausted the races. Breeders of race-horses practise this very art. By uniting animals of near kin they accumulate the blood of the breed. The perseverance of a century in this direction, produced, about 1789, the famous Eclipse, that horse of horses, that flame more rapid than voice or eye, with whom no horse dared to run, and who, by his four hundred sons in twenty years, fetched the price of all Europe. J have read all that has been written of late on this subject, and what seems to me probable, is, that marriage between relatives, while it may weaken the weak, and further degenerate them, may on the contrary strengthen the strong. I so con- clude, not only from the experience of ancient Greece, but of our own French coasts. Our sailors, prudent men, who go everywhere, and know everything, and do not decide like peasants, by local routine, generally marry their cousins, and are none the less an élite of strength, intelligence, and beauty. 144 The Woman who will love Most. The real danger in such unions is the moral one—real for all but the sailor, who is free, by his wandering life, from over- whelming influences at home. It is not without good reason that in France we marry our relatives less and less. (See the official statistics.) By the charm of common memories, such marriages are liable to retain a man firmly in the grooves of the past. The French woman particularly, exerting an influence already, by her energy and the wealth she has brought (for the law favors her more than any woman in Europe), if she is also sustained hy relatives, may become at home a power- ful instrument of reaction, and a serious obstacle to progress. Imagine how great may be the double power of domestic and religious tradition, to trammel and impede: at every step opposition, dissension—or at least sadness and inertia ; consequently, nothing done, and no advance made. A pretty Veronese at the Louvre expresses this idea perfectly. The daughter of Lot is so slow in quitting the old city, which is tumbling about her head, that the angel takes her by the arm, to drag her away; but for all that, she manages not to ad- vance a step, saying, “Only wait till I have put on my shoe!” We have no time, my beauty. So remain, and be a pillar of salt with your mother !—But no, we will not go alone; be carried, if you cannot walk. The vigor of the modern man, which can draw worlds along, will not be greatly retarded by thy weight, poor, light-witted thing. If the relative has not that special education which might associate her with progress, the foreigner (I do not say the stranger) should be preferred. She should be preferred, I say, in two cases, wherein she is known even more perfectly than the relative. The first case I laid down in Z* Amour, where a man forms his own wife. This is the surest; for he knows what he has made. I have two examples in my mind. Two of my friends, one an eminent artist, the other a dis- The Woman who will love Most. 145 tinguished and prolific writer, adopted and married two young persons, entirely fresh, without relatives and without culture. Simple, lively, charming, wholly occupied with household affairs, but gradually partaking of the ideas of their husbands, in ten or twelve years they were completely transformed. The same in external simplicity, they became mentally ladies of lively intelligence, perfectly understanding the most difficult matters. What was done to accomplish this? Nothing at all. These two men, busy, and extremely productive, have bestowed on their wives no express educa- tion. But their thoughts were elevated, and they communi- cated to them at all times their emotions, their projects, the aim. of their efforts. Love did the rest. But the success, I grant, is not always the same. A relative of mine failed in a similar attempt. He selected for a wife a Creole child of a vulgar, worldly class, with a coquettish step- mother, who very soon spoiled everything. He had roved about the world considerably, and was then a functionary in the Department of Finance. He returned home sad and weary, without the animation, the fire, of those great creators who, always at work, have always a great deal to say, to vivify a young heart. I will return to this again. The other case is that, in which of two men united in heart, jn faith, and in principles, one gives to the other his daughter, reared and educated in those principles and that faith. ‘ his supposes such a father as we saw in our first book, on Education; it supposes a mother too—two phenixes. If we found them in the second generation, we should realize some- thing impossible as yet, but which will be less so hereafter: the hypothesis of two children brought up for each. other—not ’ together, but in a happy harmony—knowing each other early, but seeing each other for a short time at long intervals, so as to become each other’s dream. All this, of course, left free for the two young hearts. But with a little diplomacy onc may create and cultivate love. Nature is so amiable a conciliator! A double education 7 146 The Man who will love Best. seems the only true logic for man and woman, each being only a half. The eastern idea, of the same being divided, and always longing to be united, is true. One should sympathize with, and help the poor half to find its “other half and restore the lost unity. Il. THE MAN WHO WILL LOVE BEST. Ir in the life of woman there is one period more fearful than another, it is the marriage of her daughter. To her, even the best, the happiest marriage is an overturning of her existence. Yesterday the house was full, now it is empty. We did not at all perceive how large a place this child filled; we were too used to so natural a happiness; we are not, indeed, conscious of living and breathing; but if our breath fail but for a mo- ment, we suffocate, we die. How different the position of the mother who can say, “ My son is married,” from that of her who must say, “I have mar- ried my daughter.” The one receives, the other gives. One enriches her family by a happy adoption; the other, when the din of the wedding is over, returns home—so poor! shall we call it “severed from her daughter?” “ widowed of her child?” No, those terms do not express it. We must always regret that a word is wanting to our language—a sad word, and full of lamentation—orba. What she gives up is Aersejf. It is herself who goes to live in the house of a stranger, to be kindly or unkindly treated. She dwells there in imagination. The man is loving to-day; but how will he be to-morrow? In fact, the son-in-law is the least ‘of all she has to worry about. How will his family behave—his mother, whom he loves, who influences him, and « The Man who will love Best. 147 who rules at home? How many ways she has of annoying the young wife, to break her in perhaps, so that she shall oppose her but little! Therefore, the mother-in-law, to pro- tect her daughter, must be respectful, and pay court to the mother. I can perfectly understand the restlessness, the eager anti- cipation, of her who for the first time looks on her future son- in-law—or at least, the young man who may become so. Ah! how I sympathize with her secret emotions. She is smiling, gracious, but at heart how moved! Truly, it is life or death with her; for what is this young man? Her rival. The more amiable, the more loveable he may be, the more will the mother be forgotten. ; A rare moment in which to observe her, for never is woman so interesting. That strife of restrained but transpa- rent emotions imparts to her an irresistible natural charm. She is beautiful in her love and her self-abnegation, beautiful by her many sacrifices. What has she not performed and suffered to create this perfect flower? Such a daughter is the visible virtue of her mother, her wisdom and her purity. Like every woman she has had her ennuis and her dreams, and she has put them all to flight with the simple words “my daughter!” She has confined herself to the domestic hearth, between God and her husband, devoting her most beautiful years to duty, to the culture of one sweet hope. And now, is it strange that her poor heart beats so wildly? That heart isin her face whatever she does; and at times it glows with glorious radiance in the light of her lovely tearful eyes. If you please, madame, try to be less fair. Do you not see that we are confused, and know not what we say? She is tempted to make use of this power. She sees that it depends wholly on herself, whether she shall charm this young man, and do with-him as she pleases. She might become absolute mistress of the future household; she might preserve her daughter from the tyrannical influence of her new family ; she mihgt, day by day (for what is impossible to a woman of 148 The Man who will love Best. wit ?) make him a good husband—amiable, even obedient. To trust him now with her cherished idol, before she is sure of him, seems impossible; she must subdue this son-in-law. And so behold her, still young as she is, recklessly plunging into dan. gerous coquetries. She thinks she can stop and retire, at will, And what is the consequence? Why that he loses his wits, often forms mad schemes, and oftener withdraws altogether. But the marriage has already been announced, and the young lady is compromised. What remedy for that? Am I writing fiction? No, it is what I myself have seen more than once, and the cases are frequent. The mother loves her daughter so much, that to marry her well she submits to the strangest conditions—a deplorable arrangement, which sometimes leaves all three overwhelmed with sadness and mortification. The wisest, the most reasonable, almost always make this mistake: they choose a son-in-law to suit themselves, and not their daughters ; they consult their own fancy, according. to a certain ideal, more or less romantic, which most have in their minds. A double ideal, but always false—I say that frankly. They admire masculine energy and strength, and they are right. But it is less the producing and creating force than the destroying energy that they select. Strangers to grand achievements, completely ignorant of what constitutes true strength of mind, they understand by valor only that short- ‘lived daring which serves on the battle-field, and think, like children, that it is fine to break everything. The man of brave speech has all the advantagé with them, They pooh- pooh the true warrior who holds his*tengue and shrugs his shoulders. Their judgment i is no aera’ as to the gentle than to the rude characteristics. They find a powerful charm in the man who resembles them,—a puppet of no sex. They weave, very awkwardly, a sentimental little romance over some good- for-nothing, girlish page—Cherubino, a shepherd in a comic opera—Nemorino, more a woman than Stella. In their novels, Proud’hon very truly observes, they never succeed in creating The Man who will love Best. 149 a man with a genuine masculine character; their hero is always a woman’s man. Now, in real life, and in so serious a matter as a mother choosing for her daughter, they act just as they do in their novels. Their preference is often, almost always, for the woman’s man, the nice young fellow of “ correct principles.” In the first place, they are flattered to perceive that they are more energetic, really more man-like than he. They think they can govern him; but they are often deceived. The amiable, insipid character is frequently but a mask assumed for success; the man, at heart, is selfish, and to-morrow will show what he is—harsh, unfeeling, false. Madam, in so important a matter, where it is a question of life with you, and even more so with her- for whom you would a hundred times sacrifice your life, will you allow me to lay aside reserve and idle subterfuges, and tell you the plain ~ truth. Do you indeed know what your charming daughter needs, she who says nothing, can say nothing? But her age and nature speak for her; respect those voices of God! Well! she needs a man! Don’t laugh. The article is not so common as you may think. A loving man is necessary ; I mean one who will alway continue to love. She needs an arm and a heart: a strong arm, to uphold her, and smoothe her way of life; arich heart, from which she may draw for ever, which she has only to touch to elicit the true spark. Woman is conservative, she requires solidity; and that is natural. There should be firm, sure soil for the hearth and the cradle. . t 150 The Man who will love Best. But everything is unstable. Where shall we find the firm- ness we desire ? No position, no property in these times can promise that. Look—not at France, not at the Continent, that sea of sand, in which everything is for ever going and coming ; but look at that sacred island of property—old England. If you except five or six houses of no great date, every estate there has changed hands often within two hundred years; only one thing is substantial—frith. You need a man of faith, But I mean active faith. “That is, a man of action!” Yes, but productive action— a producer, a creator. , The only man who has any chance of stability in this world is he whose strong hand renovates it, who creates it day by day, and if it were destroyed could recreate it. The men who possess this action, who in art, in science, in manufactures, in business, work .with energy, it matters little how they define their credo—they always have one. A beautiful miracle! you say. Yes, madam, beautiful, and very new; it is faith in things that are proved, faith in observation, in reason. Would you know the secret of that increase of modern activity which for the last three hundred years has made every century infinitely more active, more inventive, than the one that preceded it ? This—that men are no longer in the mists of that fantastic age which doubted all realities, and founded its faith on dreams. They stoutly maintain that what is, is. You will find it also in the stronger conviction of certainty. The vigor of our actions increases by the security that a firmer soil bestows. In the sixteenth century, Montaigne doubted. Excuse him; the ignorant man had no idea of the intellectual strength his great precursors had already displayed. Pas- cal, in the seventeenth century, doubted, because he chose to doubt. Galileo and many others, proved the earth so‘id. To-day thirty new sciences, erected on thousands of ob- served and computed facts, have made this earth a rock. Step The Man who will love Best. 151 with firm tread and fear not—it is the immovable rock of truth. The modern man knows what he wishes, what he does, and whither he goes. Who are the sceptics of to-day? Those who are pleased to be so, those who will not be informed, nor know the times they live in; those who, always reserving to themselves the right to change, are alarmed because there are so many immu- table things. When they proclaim their doubt I ask, “‘ What does it avail you?” Does this imply that the active and productive men of these times have perfect knowledge of the thirty sciences which constitute our security? No, they know only the great re- sults; they feel their spirit, they feel these sciences under them, firm and living. At any moment, if they fall, they will gather incalculable strength from the maternal soil of truth. And herein is the real difference between us and our fathers. They tumbled about in a marsh of earthy water or watery earth, and when their feet slipped, they could do nothing with their hands. But we, no longer slipping, do much with our hands, much with our minds, much with our inventions, We invent ten times as much as the age of Voltaire, which invented ten times as much as the age of Galileo, which in- vented ten times as much as the age of Luther. That is what makes us gay, whatever happens ; that is what makes us laugh, and stride through life with the firm step of giants. Whoever feels himself powerful—that is to say, full, strong, productive, a creator and a generator—has an inexhaustible fund of serious gaiety (I mean that), and of courage and love as well, madam. Give your daughter to such a man—a man who will always be above his business, who will take her into his actions, who will suck her into his whirlpool. I dare swear that he will love her, and that every hour of the day and the night (and there lies the gist of the matter) he will have much to tell her. 152 The Proof. IV. THE PROOF, Ir God had given me a daughter, I should have made my- self beloved. How? By exacting a great deal, by impos- ing difficult tasks—but noble ones and just. Of what use is royalty, if one does not use it? Doubtless there is a time when a woman may do much for a man—when, perceiving his value, she charms him, by imposing lofty condi- tions, and requiring him to give serious proof of his love. Why, sir, at such a time all nature makes an effort, every- thing rises one degree; the flower displays the sensibility which is the charm of animal life; the bird utters a divine song, and insect-love bursts even into flame. And do you think that man will not change then, and be a little more than man ? Proofs! sir, proofs! else I care little for your insipid asseverations. I do not ask you, like those princesses of chi- valric romances, to fetch me the head of a giant, or the crown of Trebizond. These are trifles; I exact much more. Idemand that you transform me, a young girl of obscure family and common education, into a noble, regal, heroic creature, such as I have always had in my mind—and that not transiently, but by a complete and radical transformation. Whatever your career, bring to it an imperial spirit and a noble will. Then I shall have confidence in you, I shall think you sincere; and, in my turn, will see what I can do for you. He who can do nothing for me, whom love itself cannot raise above prose, above the “ earth to earth” of this age, God save me from having him for a husband! If you cannot change, it is because you do not love. “Alas!” the mothers say, ‘what would happen if one presumed to use such severe language? Love is not the fashion; young people are so blasé, so cold; they find so The Proof. 152 many opportunities of pleasure everywhere, and are so little anxious to establish themselves! The days of chivalry are far off.” Madam, in all times, man eagerly prefers the difficult. In those days of chivalry, do you suppose the young squire could not have had all the common girls of the neighbor- hood? In the strange pell-mell and confusion of the feudal house, wenches and ladies were at the pleasure of the page. And yet he longed only for the proudest, the ‘impossible she,” her who made his life a nuisance. For her, from whom he got nothing, he would bea knight; for her he would die at Jerusalem, and bequeath to her his bleeding heart. And now there is another crusade, a crusade of labor and study, of the immense effort a young man must make to plough the furrow of a strong speciality, and sow that speci- ality with all human sciences. Everything depends on this, and henceforth he who does not know everything, cannot know anything. : I see from here, on the rue Saint-Jacques, by the opportune chance of a half-open window, a young man who, early in the morning, has had no rising to do, because he has sat up all night; but he is not weary now. Is it the morning air that has so wonderfully refreshed him? No, I think it must be that letter which he reads and re-reads, and wears out, and devours. Never did Champollion’s zeal peruse the trilingual scroll with more of eagerness. A woman’s letter, you may be sure—short and elegant. I will content myself with tran- scribing a line: ‘“ Mamma, whose hand is lame, bids me write to you, and say that she expects you to spend your holidays here, and that you must pass your final examination as soon as possible. Succeed and come.” We must not forget what a young man is in the streets of Paris, lest we forget his sadness, his languor, and his homesickness. To be sure, science is beautiful to the master, to the inventor, launched upon the sea of discovery ; but how dry and abstract to the student! Verily, the idle, thought- 154 The Proof. less friends, who never fail to come in his moments of luke- warmness, find a fine prize now. Ah! but there is the letter. In the midst of his wild com- panions’ talk he catches a glimpse of her. She holds him fast, - and fixes him; she serves him as a fever or a headache—any-: thing to prevent him from going off with them to-night. So they take themselves away, and my young friend betakes him- self to his letter-reading, over again. He studies it seriously, in form and meaning, and tries to discover by the writing if she was moved—seizing on some dash omitted, or some com- ma forgotten, as a significant matter. But the same letter, read at different Hours or moments, is full of changes; yes- terday it was passionate, to-day utterly cold; stormy one day, the next almost indifferent. Some one, I know not who, regretted nothing of his youth, “but a fine disappointment on a beautiful prairie.” Add to that the sweet pain of studying, deciphering, interpreting, in a hundred ways, the letter of your beloved. “ What! a young lady write to a young man?” Yes, sir, her mother wishes it—a wise mother, who would at any price cheer and guard the young fellow. But she by no means relishes the English method, which proudly thinks it can bring flame to flame without danger. The Swiss would go still farther in their grossness; they deem it well that the lover should spend his nights with his betrothed, who, granting all things but one, never fails, they say, to rise a virgin.