a CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell aii Library BX 8248.W8B47 of Methodism in Wisconsin :in f 008 055 5 Rev. P. S. BENNETT, A M. HISTORY OF METHODISM IN WISCONSIN, IN FOUR PARTS. BY REV. P.S. BENNETT, A. M., OF WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. PART III BEING WRITTEN BY REV. JAMES LAWSON, OF WEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. “ Thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God hath led thee.’’—DEUT, VIII, 2. PUBLISHED FOR THE AUTHORS BY CRANSTON & STOWE, OINCINNATI. 1890. CoPpyRIGHT, 1890, BY P. S. BENNETT Aanp JAMES LAWSON. GENERAL DIVISIONS. ——_—_—. Part I. HISTORY OF EPISCOPAL METHODISM IN WISCON- SIN BEFORE THE FORMATION OF THE WIS- CONSIN CONFERENCE, 1832-1848. Part II, HISTORY OF THE WISCONSIN CONFERENCE OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, 1848-1889. Part III. HISTORY OF THE WEST AND NORTHWEST WISCON- SIN CONFERENCES, OF THE METHODIST EPISCO- PAL CHURCH, 1856-1889. i Part IV. HISTORY OF OTHER METHODIST BODIES IN WIS- CONSIN, 1842-1889. . PRIMITIVE METHODIST CHURCH. . EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION (GERMAN). . GERMAN EPIscoPpalL METHODISTS. . SCANDINAVIAN METHODISTS. . FREE METHODISTS, . AMERICAN WESLEYAN METHODISTS. Nn pW DN HW PREFACE. °: Tae work was undertaken more from a convic- tion of the need of something like it than a con- sciousness of ability to produce what the subject demands. This conviction, at first feeble, grew upon me until it crystallized into a partially formed conclusion to enter upon the work. At this point the following resolution was presented to the Conference and unani- mously adopted : “ WueErEAS, We learn that Rev. P. S. Bennett is con- templating the production of a history of Methodism in Wisconsin ; therefore, ‘ Resolved, That we hereby express our hearty approval of the undertaking, and will aid him therein by furnishing historical data as far as we can, hoping an early com- pletion of the work. (Signed,) “J. L. Hewirr, B. R. Raymonp, «J. 8. Davis, H. Favitye, “8. Luee, E. G. Uppyke, «T, C. Wiuttson, T. WALKER, “«W. P. Srowe, H. SEweELL, “W. D. AMEs, S. Smrru.” This settled the question. Though a difficult task, I hardly dared refuse to attempt it. 5 6 PREFACE, But the difficulties encountered were more and greater than those anticipated. We had been making history for more than a half century. During aconsiderable portion of this period the country was new, society unsettled, and records imperfectly kept. Much needed information was treasured in the memory of persons far advanced in life, and widely dispersed over our vast country. It was often difficult to find them, and, when found, their recollections were not always the same. Much dis- crimination was needed to balance up. Besides, it was not easy to get desired and available information from those in the active work. Circulars were sent to the pastors, with blanks to be filled and returned. More than two-thirds of the pastors failed to respond. This was very embarrassing. To bring order out of chaos is difficult; to make something out of nothing is impossible in reliable history. Nor was this the end of difficulties. The book is to be, not biographies of the living nor memorials of the dead, but a record of acts and results. Yet the actors are to come into view and assigned to their proper places. And when one leaves the work by death or otherwise, he must receive appropriate notice. To do this judiciously is not an easy task. The plan of covering the entire State and of em- bracing every branch of Methodism therein, has neces- sitated abridgment where enlargement would other- wise have been proper. The Appendices have cost much labor, and it is hoped they will be appreciated. PREFACE. 7 The work has been delayed by a failure to get the history of West and Northwest Wisconsin Confer- ences written at an earlier date. Rev. James Lawson, a highly honored member of the West Wisconsin Conference, at length undertook the work; and he will doubtless do it well. It constitutes Part III of this book. Considerable space is given to the anti-slavery and temperance questions ; some may think too much. But as the former was the absorbing question of the time, towering above all other National issues in im- portance, and as the latter is scarcely less so now, I feel justified in treating them thus. The question of illustrations was decided at a rather late period, and the result is not quite satis- factory to me in not being able to secure more of the earlier preachers for Parts I and II. The failure is not due to lack of effort. Brother Lawson has suc- ceeded far better for Part III. It is hoped that these faces will awaken profitable reminiscences of past labors and successes. - Great pains have been taken to secure historic accuracy throughout the work; yet entire freedom from errors is not expected. But the hope is cherished that it will be serviceable in many ways, and not the least in aiding some future historian to produce some- thing better. P. 8. BENNETT. PART. I. HISTORY OF METHODISM IN WISCONSIN BEFORE THE FORMATION OF WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ©: CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. O give the reader a proper view of the situation, a brief account of the civil relations of this country— the scene of the conflicts and triumphs to be recorded—may be beneficial. It has been successively under the jurisdic- tion of Spain, France, Great Britain, and America. In connection with the latter it was, at different periods, a part of the State of Virginia, of the Northwest Terri- tory, of the Territories of Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan, before becoming a Territory itself. A brief history of these transitions may be given thus: On Easter Sunday, 1512, Juan Ponce de Leon, a com- panion of Columbus, discovered the southern coast of the North American Continent, and named it Pascua Florida (Easter Flower Land). A subject of Ferdinand, king of Spain, he claimed it for his sovereign. The Spaniards designated the entire region, from the Gulf of Mexico to the Great Lakes, Florida, and assumed dominion over it; but as nearly all this vast region was unexplored, and in- habited only by the aborigines, this dominion was only ideal. Such as it was, it continued until 1627, when 1 g 10 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. France secured jurisdiction, and held it for one hundred and thirty-five years. During this period French Jesuits made extensive ex- plorations, and established several missions among the natives. In 1634, M. Nicollet made his way from the Ottowa River, in Canada, where he had been living among the Indians, to Green Bay, and soon penetrated the interior as far as the Wisconsin River. He was, doubtless, the first white man whose foot pressed the soil of this wide domain. Other adventurers followed, some as fur-traders, others as explorers and missionaries. In 1670 two Jesuits—Pére Claude Allouez and Claud Dablon—established the mission of St. Francois Xavier, on the south side of Fox River, supposed to be where the city of De Pere now stands. Other missions, also, were founded by similar agencies among the various Indian tribes scattered throughout the wilds of this great Northwest. By treaty stipulations between France and England, in 17638, civil jurisdiction passed to the latter, accompanied by actual occupancy, and this continued until the issue of the Revolutionary War brought it under American rule. In 1778, Virginia extended its jurisdiction over the ‘‘Tilinois country ,” and formed the ‘‘ county of Illinois,” em- bracing the territory now included within the States of Illinois and Wisconsin. The Northwest Territory was organized in 1787, and in- cluded all north of the Ohio River and west of Pennsyl- vania, as far as the “Great River”—the Mississippi. Within this territory the domain of Wisconsin continued until 1800, when it became a part of the Territory of Indiana, formed that year. For nine years it continued in that relation, and then became a part of the newly formed Territory of Illinois, with which, also, it remained nine years. INTRODUCTORY. 11 On the formation of the latter into a State, in 1818, our many-times espoused country became wedded to the Terri- tory of Michigan, and passed as many years as in both the last-named relations. In 1836 it became more conspicuous, being organized into a Territory bearing its present name, including also the domain of the present State of Iowa. In 1848 it was admitted into the Union, making the thirtieth star on our National Banner. For more than a hundred and fifty years, or until 1829, the aborigines of this region learned nothing of Christianity except what was contained in Jesuistic teaching. And as Roman Catholicism is a mixture of paganism, of Judaism, and of Christianity, and as Jesuits, in their efforts to con- vert the heathen, always concede largely to their customs and prejudices, provided they will accept the Cross, the Mass, and the Confessional, no great improvement of these sons of the forest can reasonably be expected to have been made; and appearances indicated very little. 12 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. CHAPTER II. 1832-6. MISSIONS AMONG THE INDIANS IN THE VICINITY OF GREEN BAY. . N the 21st of October, 1829, by an act of the Legis- lature of Michigan Territory, in which this country was included, a Protestant Episcopal Church was incor- porated at Green Bay. This was probably the first Prot- estant religious organization west of Lake Michigan. A mission-school was soon established under the supervision of Richard Cadle, rector of the Church, for the benefit of the various Indian tribes that inhabited this region from time immemorial. Its location was about midway between the present cities of Green Bay and De Pere.* About 1822 the Oneida and Stockbridge Indians began to remove from the State of New York and settle on the east side of Fox River, near the site of Kaukauna, then called ‘“‘ Kau-kau-lin.” They continued to come in small companies at different times, under governmental direc- tion, until a considerable number of them were here. This circumstance seems to have formed a sort of con- necting link between this wild region and the East. * So far as is known the first religious service conducted by a Protestant within the present limits of our State was at Green Bay, in 1820. Dr. Jedediah Morse, father of Professor Morse, who invented the magnetic telegraph, was sent there by the Government on business connected with the Indians; and, being a minister of the gospel, he preached once or more while there. INDIAN MISSTONS. 13 * The Methodist Episcopal Church had performed a vast amount of really missionary work previous to 1819—her ministers being in large measure self-sustained missionaries. After that, she began to prosecute missionary operations in a more systematic way, under her well-organized Mis- sionary Society, formed that year. In May, 1832, the sixth delegated General Conference, was held in Philadelphia. The Committee on Missions recommended “the extension of the aboriginal missions in the Western and Northwestern frontiers.” This fired the heart of John Clark, a delegate from the New York Conference, whose mind had previously been directed to the cause of the Indians; ‘‘and, after due consideration and much prayer, he offered himself to the Board as a missionary to Green Bay, and was accepted.” On the sixth day of the next month his Conference com- menced its session, and the list of appointments closes with “John Clark, appointed missionary to Green Bay.” He immediately began to prepare for the long and perilous move, and on the 2ist of July he arrived safely at his wilderness field of labor. Considering the poor facilities of travel at that time, this was a marvelously expeditious transit. It gave an earnest of the promptitude and energy needed to prosecute his difficult work. ‘*The Indian settlement whose interests were specially kept in view in establishing this mission” was not at Green Bay, but at the ‘‘Grand Kau-Kau-lin” (Kaukauna), on the east side of Fox River, about twenty-five miles from the bay. It was made up of fragments of different tribes from ‘the State of New York, as already stated. So effectively did Mr. Clark perform his work, that on the 15th of September—less than two months from the date of his arrival—he had the pleasure of dedicating to the service of the Lord a newly erected building, designed alike as a house of worship and a school for the instruc- tion of children in secular and sacred knowledge. This 14 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. unpretentious structure, built of logs, twenty-four by thirty feet, was the first Methodist house of worship west of Lake Michigan, and north of a line extending west from a point fifty miles south of Chicago to the Pacific Ocean—an area sufficient for a dozen States as large as Wisconsin. At the same time, and in their newly consecrated temple, Mr. Clark formed a class composed of twenty-five Indians, “‘most of whom gave evidence of a change of heart,” and the others of a ‘‘desire to flee the wrath to come and be saved from their sins.” The sacrament of the Lord’s Sup- per was then administered to about forty Indians, some of whom were Stockbridges and Tuscaroras from the Presby- terian mission near by, under the care of Messrs. Marsh and Stevens. This seems to have been one of ‘‘ the times of reireshing from the presence of the Lord.” Such was the beginning of our missionary work among the Indians in the vicinity of Green Bay. Mr. Clark found on his arrival one Daniel Adams, who had been a preacher among his people in Oneida, New York, and seemed very much interested in the establish- ment of a mission for their benefit in these ends of the earth. Providence had also anticipated the advent of the missionary by leading thither Miss Quinney, a pious female Indian from the same place, competent to teach school there. On the next day they met, sung, prayed, and then organized a school of thirty Indian children. Arrangements were also made with the teacher to conduct a Sabbath-school for the benefit of both children and adults. But Mr. Clark could not be confined to that ‘place. “The Green Bay country” was vast in extent. So, havy- ing put Mr. Adams in charge of that mission for the time, he proceeded down the west shore of the bay to Lake Superior, forming missions or mission stations at different points, which he continued to supervise for several years. INDIAN MISSIONS. 15 It would be interesting to trace his labors in those wild regions; but limited space, as well as the plan of this work, forbid going beyond our own territory. The Menomonee Mission deserves a passing notice. It was located on the site of the present growing city of Mari- nette, in our State, and the Hon. Isaac Stevenson’s beautiful residence covers the old mission premises. The mission did not eventuate in anything permanent, as did the one on Fox River, to which we again turn attention. The Oneidas had not yet found their abiding-place. They soon formed a treaty with the Government, by which their present Reservation was secured to them; and in the summer of 1833, Superintendent Clark ‘‘ contracted for two houses—one for the school, and the other for the teacher.” Meanwhile, Miss Quinney had become the wife of Mr. Adams; thus the resident missionary and the teacher were of the same household. No harm seems to have come to the mission from the removal of the Oneidas to their new home. In May, 1834, when Mr. Clark made his next visit to them, he found the mission in a prosperous condition, and this pious couple comfortably settled in a new log house, faithfully prose- cuting their work. The residence of Superintendent Clark had been Sault de St. Marie, on the Straits between Lakes Superior and Huron. To secure a more central location, he decided in November, 1834, to remove to Green Bay. So he started with his family, and arrived at Mackinaw on the 5th of December, expecting to sail thence to Green Bay ; but, to his great disappointment, navigation was closed for the winter. Having provided as comfortable quarters for his family as he could, he resumed his apostolic journey alone, via De- troit, Ypsilanti, Chicago, Milwaukee, and Lake Winnebago, arriving at the Bay, January 27, 1835. This was a long, * 16 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. severe, and perilous trip, such as few missionaries have performed in any age or land. It showed the moral hero- ism of the man. Mr. Clark found the mission at the Bay quite prosperous under the labors of Rev. George White, of whom more hereafter. The Oneida Mission also continued to grow in numbers and future promise under the care of Daniel Adams, who had gathered a society of forty members. About this time this faithful missionary and his devoted wife, having la- bored in that field for several years with gratifying success, removed to the Indian Territory to engage in similar work among the Senecas there, who spoke the same language— the Mohawk. About the year 1844, Mr. Adams ‘rested from his labors,” and passed on to his reward, honored and lamented by those for whom he had faithfully toiled. For a time the school was under the care of Rolla H. Chubb, who, in 1836, was succeeded by Miss Sophia Mudgett and Miss Ethelinda Lee, just from Newbury Seminary, Vermont. The latier opened a new school about four miles north of the other, in a house secured by a permanent lease, as was supposed; but in less than a week a mob composed of chiefs and others, under the pas- toral charge of the Protestant Episcopal missionary, razed it to the ground. Our missions in this region had been considerably annoyed by the Jesuits, and this was not very surprising, as their converts were lifted but little above their former pagan state; but that any branch of Prot- estant Christianity should exhibit such fiendish opposition to real evangelistic work is passing strange, even though put to shame for their inactivity by their more zealous neighbor. Up to this time Mr. Clark had the general oversight of all the missions under our care, extending from Oneida and Green Bay to Sault de St. Marie; thence west on the southern shore of Lake Superior to Ke-wa-we-non—a INDIAN MISSIONS. 17 distance of about four hundred miles from extreme points. He was sent out by the New York Conference, in 1882, as already stated; but was re-enforced by a small corps of valiant men from the Troy Conference, such as Henry Whitehead, Milton Bourne, and D. M. Chandler. In the summer of 1839 the writer was one of four ministers that bore the latter to his last resting-place in Weedsport, New York, where he died while on his way back from these wild regions. The first named died a few months since, honored and loved by all who knew him. The other—Mr. Bourne—is still, so far as the writer is informed, on this side the river. Their lay and native helpers are probably all in the home of the faithful. Notwithstanding the vast territory over which the labors of these men extended, the Argus eyes of the inde- fatigable superintendent were ever open to see new fields in the region beyond. So, having heard that a large band of Chippewas—four or five hundred—were located at a point about midway between Lake Superior and the Mississippi, he decided at once to establish a mission among them, if practicable. For this purpose he sent three trusty young Chippewas—John Tounchy, George Copway, and Peter Marksman—to visit the settlement and open the work there. The place was on a lake at the head of one of the principal branches of the Chippewa River, called by the French Lac Court Oreille (Lac Coort Ora), though called by the Indians Ottawa, as a family of that tribe first settled there. Several adverse circumstances rendered this unsuccess- ful for a time. The next summer (July, 1836), Mr. Clark visited the place himself, was treated very kindly by the chief Moo-zoo-jeele (Moose Tail), and accomplished his ob- ject. He left Copway and Tounchy in charge of the mis- sion, and made his way to the Mississippi, about two hun- dred miles above Prairie du Chien. Here he met Rev. A. 18 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Brunson, who had recently been sent from the Pittsburg Conference as superintendent of the Indian missions on the Upper Mississippi. Of this pioneer the reader will hear more hereafter. Thence this successor of St. Paul proceeded to Green Bay via the Wisconsin and Fox Rivers, skirted on either hand by a dense wilderness, little thinking, perhaps, that within a half century the country all along would bristle with civilized life, and such cities as Portage, Berlin, Osh- kosh, Neenah, Menasha, Appleton, Kaukauna, and De Pere, with a score of lesser towns, would verify the proph- ecy, ‘‘ The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them, and the desert shall rejoice and blossom as the rose.” The reader will be able to form a conception of this apostolic journey by these reflections of the missionary after his safe return : “1. In all my journey of eleven weeks, a distance of two thousand miles, my strength, courage, and patience have been equal to my day. To God be all the praise. ‘©2,. The more I travel in the Indian country, the more does my heart long for their salvation.” Though much of the seed sown in these fields seems to have fallen on stony places, there is good reason to believe that all was not lost. In some there was permanent suc- cess, and the sowing and harvesting are still going on. And even in some cases where the unsettled habits of the Indians may appear to have done more havoc than the fowls of the air or the shallow soil, the seed of the king- dom was, perhaps, carried to distant places, and produced harvests more or less abundant. This tedious and perilous journey was concluded in September, 1836. : ITS BIRTHPLACE. 19 CHAPTER III. 1832-5. WORK AMONG THE WHITE POPULATION. OR the purpose of giving a connected account of the Indian missions, some synchronous events in our his- tory among the white or general population have been passed. To these we now turn. The question as to the birthplace of Methodism in Wis- consin (except our work among the Indians) has long been in doubt. After a thorough research, the following seem to be all the ascertainable facts: At the session of the Illinois Conference, in 1828, John Dew was appointed to Galena, then a small hamlet, but the head-quarters of the lead-mining interest of that region. There were mining camps and settlements at different ‘points in Grant and Lafayette Counties, Wisconsin ; par- ticularly at Gratiot’s Grove. It is known that Mr. Dew preached at some of these places, more or less, in the autumn of 1828, and baptized several children of the miners. In the Galena Advertiser of August 15, 1829, attention is called to a ‘‘two days’ meeting to be held by Rev. J. Dew, at Mr. Ahab Bean’s, on Fever River, about twelve miles from this place, on Saturday and Sabbath, August 2ist and 22d.”* Fever River rises in Wisconsin, a few miles east of *®See “Memorials of Methodism in Rock River Confer- ence,” by A. D. Field. 20 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN: Platteville, and runs nearly due south in its general course through Galena; and as the latter place is about six miles from the southern boundary of our State, the said meeting must have been in Wisconsin. We find no record of any Church organization in these places; but, judging from the religious proclivities of the miners in after years, who were mostly Englishmen, it is very probable that some of them were Methodists. If classes were formed among these, the unsettled state of things may account for the failure to transmit the records to us. Major J. H. Rountree, well and favorably known throughout our State, built a miner’s cabin on the present site of Platteville, 1827. On the 7th of August, 1828, he was married to Miss Grace Mitchell, who had been for four years a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and settled at once at the last-named place. This region was then attracting much attention on account of its mineral deposits. It was known as the ‘‘Lead Mines.” Outside thé mines, with the exception of the garrison at Fort Howard, and French trading-posts at Green Bay, Prairie du Chien, and Milwaukee, there was not a white settlement in the vast region north of ‘Illinois, and probably not a white inhabitant. The beaver, the badger, the wolf, the panther, and the bear held un- disputed sway, only as kept in check at the points just named, and by the native sons of the soil. From a letter of Major Rountree to the writer, the following facts are gleaned: In the month of April, 1832, a Methodist preacher came from Indiana to Platteville on Saturday, and stayed with him till Monday. On the Sabbath he preached, held a class-meeting, and took the names of those present, viz.: J. H. Rountree and wife, William B. Vineyard and wife, Miss Paine, and a Mr. McMurry. By this he understood that the preacher in- tended to form a class; butit seems not to have gone to organ- ITS BIRTHPLACE. 21 ization. The next day he went to Galena, and hearing that the Blackhawk (Indian) War was to be prosecuted through- out the lead region, be returned to Indiana. It is a matter of regret that the name of this preacher, being now un- known, can not go into our chronicles. Nor can it now be known by what authority he visited the country. But whatever were his intentions as to future operations, they were thwarted by war rumors, which filled the whole country with consternation. According to Dr. W. G. Miller, Colonel Samuel Ryan, who had been a Methodist for some years, came to Fort Howard as a military officer in 1826, began to hold relig- ious services, and continued them till the arrival of Mis- sionary Clark. He then says: ‘‘ Immediately after his arrival he began his labors, preaching the first Methodist sermon within the limits of the present boundaries of our conference. The sermon was preached to both soldiers and citizens. The first class was formed by Brother Clark immediately after, the services being held in the fort. This class consisted of four members, as follows: Colonel Samuel Ryan, Sr., Mrs. Sherman, Mrs. General Brook, and a young man whose name can not be given. Mrs. ‘Brook was the wife of the commandant of the fort, and Colonel Ryan was the class-leader. In October, 1832, John T. Mitchell a probationer of one year’s standing in Illinois Conference, was appointed to Galena Mission. Galena was the emporium of the ‘‘ Mineral Region,” the largest town in Northern Illinois, far in advance of Chicago; and yet it contained only about one thousand inhabitants, many of whom were ‘ prospect- ing” for mineral, and at best only transient residents. Being near the northern boundary of Illinois, young Mitchell extended his labors among the miners at Platte- ville, Mineral Point, Wiota, and Dodgeville—all now points of importance in our State—and established appoint- 22 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. ments at each place. He was a brother of Mrs. Rountree, of Platteville, and, being a single man, made her house his home much of the time. John Clark, whose work among the Indians has been described, antedated him a few weeks as a pioneer; but Mr. Mitchell was the first ‘‘ voice crying in the wilderness” to the white population within the present boundaries of Wisconsin whose work took organic form. In 1833 Galena was connected with ‘‘ De Buke”—so we find the orthography—with Barton Randle and John T. Mitchell as preachers. It was in some way arranged for the former to occupy the portion of this field west of the Mississippi, and the latter, that east of it. Thus his work was substantially the same as the previous year. If neither could say, ‘‘ The world is my parish,” Mr. Randle had one that extended from the ‘‘ Father of Waters” west to the Pacific Ocean, and from Missouri north to the Brit- ish Possessions; while Mr. Mitchell’s covered more than forty thousand square miles, so far as pastoral authority was concerned. The Conference was held in September, 1833, and on the twenty-second day of December following, Mr. Mitchell formed the first Methodist Society, and dedicated the first. Methodist ‘‘ meeting-house” west of Lake Michigan, ex- cept the mission-work at and near Green Bay. This was in Platteville. The edifice thus set apart for public wor- ship was formerly occupied by Major Rountree, then Ter- ritorial Judge, as his court-room. But it was recon- structed, seated, furnished with a pulpit made by the preacher himself; and so, decidedly orthodox, if not ele- gant. It was sixteen feet square, one story high, and built of small logs. In this humble structure the class was formed—the nucleus of a large, influential Church. It consisted of six members—Mrs. Rountree and Miss Ellen A. Mitchell, sisters of the preacher, and four others ITS BIRTHPLACE. 23 whose names can not go into this history; but we trust they are in the ‘* Book of Life.” This may be deemed a small beginning. Be itso. It was nevertheless a beginning. Besides, there was then but one Methodist church edifice within the Rock River Confer- ence. That was in Galena, dedicated a few weeks before. * From the foregoing it is reasonable to conclude that Colonel Ryan was the first Jay member of the Methodist Episcopal Church on our soil; that Mrs. Rountree was the second; that the first religious services of any sort, . conducted by a Methodist within the present limits of Wisconsin, were in the garrison at Fort Howard, and led by Colonel Ryan; that the first sermon preached, and the first baptismal ceremonies performed by a Methodist preacher within the same limits, were at or near Gratiot’s Grove, by John Dew, the latter part of 1928; that the second Methodist sermon and the first class-meeting known to have been held, were at Platteville, in the spring of 1832, con- ducted by a preacher whose name is lost to our history ; that in July, 1832, John Clark preached the first Methodist sermon in what is now Wisconsin Conference, and formed the first class within the present boundaries of our State; that John T. Mitchell is the fourth Methodist preacher on Wisconsin soil, and the first one sent to labor among the white population, known to have organized societies or taken any measures to provide a special place for public worship for them. Both these were done December 28, 1838. If the pilgrim preacher who visited the place in 1832 intended to form a class, he left no record of it, and it was not perpetuated. Hence the former date must be re- *In the summer of 1850, Mr. Mitchell, while on a visit to Platteville, related the facts concerning the formation of the class and the little log chapel to the writer, then pastor of the Methodist Episcopal Church there. 24 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. garded as the true natal day of Methodism in Platteville. Those lay pioneers, Colonel Ryan and Mrs. Rountree, de- serve further notice. Mr. Ryan was born in Ireland on the 22d of May, 1789. In early life he entered the United States military service, in which he continued several years. He was in the War of 1812-1814, and was wounded in the en- gagement between the Shannon and the Chesapeake, on the Ist of June, 1813. He was converted in 1821, while garrisoned in Sackett’s Harbor, New York, and joined the Methodist Episcopal Church. He was soon after removed to Sault de St. Marie. Here he must have had a severe trial of his faith. There was no chaplain in this garrison, and the corrupting influences of the post were hard to stem. But he remained faithful, both as a soldier of the Cross and of his adopted country. He held frequent re- ligious services, and many were converted to God. Com- ing to Fort Howard, he continued the same good work, and thus is entitled to be regarded as the Barbara Heck and the Captain Webb of Wisconsin Methodism. A few years after, he became register in the Govern- ment Land-office at Green Bay. This was removed to Menosha in 1852, but he remained in the same office for several years. The writer enjoyed an intimate acquaintance with him for many years, and most cheerfully bears testi- mony to his great moral worth. Though impulsive, and occasionally a little indiscreet, he was never jostled from a fixed purpose of loyalty to his convictions of duty. He died in the spring of 1876. Mrs. Rountree had a shorter pilgrimage. She died, at her home in Platteville, on the 16th of October, 1837. Her honored husband, who has survived her more than forty years, bears this brief but expressive testimony of this noble woman: ‘‘She had lived a most exemplary Christian life, and her last words were, ‘Jesus is with me.’” ANNALS OF 1834. 25 The reader may wonder that no Church organization was formed in the mining country for a year or more after the energetic Mitchell commenced his labors there. But when we remember that the inhabitants were, almost with- out exception, in quest of mineral, ready to pack up any day and move on to a more promising ‘‘ digging,” and also that the entire ‘‘ West,” in which this country was included, was in a feverish excitement on account of the ‘‘ Black Hawk War,” we shall find the explanation. This beginning of organized work among the white pop- ulation on our soil was in connection with the Illinois Con- ference. Thus it continued until the formation of the Rock River Conference in 1840. In 1832 it was in the Quincy District, with Peter Cartwright presiding elder, and in 1833, in Chicago District, John Sinclair presiding elder. There is no evidence that either of them ever set foot on our territory. No further notice, therefore, is accorded them here than to say that both were distinguished minis- ters of our Church. The former became almost world-wide in reputation—the only man in the history of Methodism that was fifty years a presiding elder. 1834. In 1834, Iowa Mission appears in the Conference ap- pointments, with L. Bevins as preacher. The name is from Iowa County, and the mission included all the mining region in what is now Wisconsin. It was included in Galena District, formed this year, with Hooper Crews as presiding elder. Mr. Bevins appears in the list of appointments this year first and last. In 1836 he located. He turned his atten- tion to mining, near Platteville, and after a few years “struck a lead,” which, it was said, yielded fifty-five thou- sand dollars’ worth of mineral. He died not long after this success, leaving an amiable wife—a sister of Dr. 2 @ 26 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Richard Haney—and several lovely children. In 1849 the writer, on entering upon his pastorate there, found them still pursuing the way to Zion. During this year (1834) the little sixteen-feet-square church at Platteville was abandoned as a house of worship, and the young society took possession of a larger structure, built of hewn logs, designed for the double purpose of teaching the ‘‘ young mind how to shoot,” and older ones «the way of salvation.” The Minutes of Oneida Conference, in the State of New York, for 1834, show that George White was appointed missionary to Green Bay. As there is no intimation given that his labors were to be in connection with the Indians, it is very probable that he was to serve the white popula- tion. Yet he was under the superintendence of Missionary Clark, as appears from the following extract from the ‘‘ Life of Clark,” page 153: ‘On his arrival at Green Bay he found the state of the mission quite prosperous under the labors of Rev. George White, who had that post in charge. Mr. White sent a communication to the Board about this time, in which he bears strong testimony to the faithfulness and zeal of the superintendent.” This refers to the arrival of Mr. Clark from Sault de St. Marie via Chicago, already described. It was in Jan- uary, 1835, a few months after Mr. White reached the place. Why this should be the only allusion to him in connection with Mr. Clark’s work, is marvelous, as he was at that post for two years. From Iowa Mission, in Galena District, were reported eighty members—the only report from what is now Wis- consin, for the Conference year 1834-5. 1835. This year Alfred Bronson, late of the Pittsburg Con- ference, was put in charge of Galena District, and also of ANNALS OF 1835, 27 the Indian missions on the Upper Mississippi. Iowa Cir- cuit, still including all our work in the mineral region, was one of the appointments. It was a large field, involving a great amount of travel and many privations. James Hadley was the preacher. He came from Southern Illinois, a long distance for that time. Rev. J. Crummer, then residing on his circuit, describes him as ‘‘a good, laborious Methodist preacher;” says ‘‘he kept to his work,” and adds: ‘‘ A man that would do that in those days had good Methodist preacher timber in him.” He evidently did his work well, as he reported one hundred and thirty-six mem- bers—a gain of seventy per cent. This was his first and last year on our territory. It is supposed he has long since ‘‘crossed the flood.” This year Milwaukee—hitherto unknown to Method- ism—is found in the list of appointments included in Chicago District, W. B. Mack, presiding elder; and M. Robinson, preacher in charge. It seems, from the best available authority, that Mr. Robinson was in the place, and preached the first Methodist sermon there in June, 1835; but the mission was not formed till the autumn fol- lowing, when he was received on trial by the Illinois Con- ference, and appointed in charge of it. On the 19th of January, that same year, John Clark reached what he calls ‘‘ the mouth of Milwaukee River,” on his memorable journey from Sault de St. Marie to Green Bay, already alluded to, and was ‘‘ kindly entertained at the house of Solomon Juneau,” a Frenchman, who had long been an Indian trader—the first white settler there. But as he makes no mention of any other inhabitants, and as the first purchase of public land in that region was made by Mr. Juneau on the 31st of August, 1835—the earliest date at which it could be purchased—there could have been but few settlers in the vicinity of our present growing metropolis. Indeed, there seems to have been nothing like 28 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. immigration till the spring of 1835, though about a year before two or three young men settled on Milwaukee River, three or four miles from its mouth, and erected a saw-mill. From all this, it is a fair inference that Mr. Robinson worked up such an interest during the summer as to justify the establishment of a mission there. Within this mission were several preaching-places, and from the work fifty- three members were reported at the next Conference. The class in Milwaukee was formed in the summer of 1836, and consisted of David Worthington, Mrs. S. Brown, Mrs. Firman, and Mrs. Lowry. The writer has not been able to obtain the names of others, if there were any; nor yet the dates of other classes on the charge, or the names of the members. Small though this was, it was doubtless the first relig- ious organization in the limits of our metropolis. The next was probably the Presbyterian Church, formed in 1837. Of the subsequent history of Mr. Robinson, who did such heroic work in and about Milwaukee, we know little. His name appears no more in the Conference Minutes, from which fact it is probable that he retired to the local ranks. The report of members this year was as follows: Iowa Mission, 136; Milwaukee, 53; Prairie du Chien, 10; Oneida, 48; Green Bay, 34; total, 281—more than three times the number of the preceding year. The ministerial force increased from two to eleven. This increase is partly due to the fact that Green Bay and Oneida reported this year for the first time to the Illinois Conference. ANNALS OF 1836, 29 CHAPTER IV. 1836. HIS year the Territory of Wisconsin was organized, including the present area of Iowa and Wisconsin. This was an important epoch in the history of this country. Immigration increased rapidly, and new settlements ap- peared in all directions. The Michigan Conference was formed in May, and included the entire territory embraced in the State as it now is, thus taking in all the Indian missions in the vicinity of Sault de St. Marie. The rest were placed under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Conference, to which Missionary Clark was transferred at the ensuing session of the New York Conference. At the Conference in October following he was ap- pointed presiding elder of Chicago District, and Alfred Bronson of Galena District. The former included our work in the vicinity of Lake Michigan; the latter, that in the western part of the State. Seven pastoral charges on our territory appear this year in the Minutes of Illinois Conference, instead of two of the previous year. But this increase came from change of jurisdiction and division of circuits. George White, who, as we have seen, had been for two years missionary at Green Bay, by appointment from Oneida Conference, in New York, was transferred to IIli- nois Conference, but was to continue in charge of the work at the Bay until the session of the last-named body. He did so, and then located. He subsequently became a clerk in some department of the Government at Washington, and died several years ago. 30 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Milwaukee Mission became two bands—Milwaukee Sta- tion and Root River Mission, with William S. Crissey in charge of the former, and S. Pillsbury of the latter. Up to this time nothing is known as to the place in which the young society held meetings—probably as in other localities, in some private house. In December of this year Leverett S, Kellog came to the place, and identi- fied himself with the struggling Church. He was a car- penter, and had a shop on the corner of Huron and East Water Streets. This became their place of worship for several months. Mr. Kellog will come under notice more prominently in due time. The two pastoral charges above named seem to have been prosperous, as from them were reported at the next Conference one hundred and fifteen members. At the close of this year, Mr. Crissey passed into Illinois. So far as appears, the first quarterly meeting in Milwaukee was held by John Clark, January 8th and 9th, 1837. Iowa Circuit gave place to Platteville and Mineral Point Circuits, with Collon D. James and James W. Haney, preachers on the former, and Richard Haney and John Crummer on the latter. Platteville Circuit embraced all the settlements in Grant County, and in the western part of Lafayette; Mineral Point, all the rest of the settled country west and southwest of Madison. Probably each had from fifteen to twenty ‘‘preaching-places.” Prairie du Chien seems to have been formerly included in the Upper Mississippi Indian missions, so far as supplied at all. It now embraced all white settlements north of the Wisconsin River. David King, the pastor, began the year with ten members, and closed it with twenty-nine. In the winter of 1836-7, J. Crummer and William Haney were exchanged. Thus the former became the junior preacher on Platteville Circuit, and the latter on Mineral Point. These preachers were all young, both in ANNALS OF 1836, 31 years and in the ministry. Mr. James had been connected with the conference but two years; Mr. R. Haney, one; and the others had just been received on trial. They all seem to have .been successful in their work. From Platte- ville were reported at the next conference one hundred and thirty members; from Mineral Point, seventy-eight. The country was new, the inhabitants few and poor, and yet living was somewhat expensive. But these pio- neers, with no missionary funds to aid them, toiled on, en- dured many hardships, and, almost selfsupported, laid the foundation for flourishing Churches. Richard Haney taught school in Mineral Point for six months, thus making the burden lighter for the feeble circuit. There was a small society there, but no church edifice, as we shall see in due time. He “ preached in what was called the court-house,” evidently .a building in which were held all public gather- ings, though primarily designed for judicial purposes. As Mr. Haney’s time was divided between his circuit work and his school, he could do but little in the former beyond meeting his regular appointments. These were Mineral Point, Dodgeville, Willow Springs, Helena, Ham- ilton Grove, and Pedlar’s Creek. At the latter place he formed a class consisting of three Cornish miners, all bach- elors, living in one cabin. He formed one also at Hamil- _ton’s Grove. One of the members, William Kimball, first discovered copper in Wisconsin. In a letter to the writer, Mr. Haney quaintly remarks, ‘The greater part of my sheep were late lambs,” thus indicating that most of his visible success appeared in the latter part of the year. The names of R. Haney, W. 8. Crissey, C. D. James, and J. W. Haney appear for the first and Jast time in connection with Wisconsin. They all passed into fields further south. Richard Haney became prominent in the Rock River Conference, and after several years fell into the Central Illinois Conference by division of territory, 382 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. where he continued to rise in eminence among his brethren, whom he has several times represented in General Confer- ences. He is now an octogenarian, in the fifty-fourth year of the itinerant ministry, never having lost a month from active service. Few men have a brighter record than the present Dr. Richard Haney. Of Mr. James less is known. His colleague bears testi- mony to his great fidelity and earnestness as a minister of the gospel. J. W. Haney’s name does not appear in the list of ap- pointments the next year. Two events worthy of note marked the latter part of this Conference year. One is, the advent to Platteville of Rev. Samuel Mitchell, called by everybody, ‘‘ Father Mitchell.” As he was so conspicuous in various ways, a brief account of him may be given here, though he will come to view occasionally in the following pages. He was a native of Virginia; had inherited twenty-five slaves, and held them as such till he became a Christian. He then eman- cipated them, and after a while moved to Southern Illinois, taking with him those who were disposed to go, and pro- vided them homes as far as he could. Thus he showed the thoroughness of his conversion. When he came to Platteville he was upwards of seventy years of age, having been a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church for about fifty years, and a local preacher about forty. He was the father of Rev. J. T. Mitchell, who formed the first Methodist class in Platteville, and of Mrs. Rountree and Miss Ellen Mitchell, two of its members; also of Revs. James and Frank F. Mitchell, who will come to view hereafter. About 1855 he removed to Missouri, to spend his last days with his last-named son, where he soon died. His remains were taken back to his Machpelah in Platteville, and laid beside those of his wife, depusited there in 1842. , ANNALS OF 1386, 33 The other event is the erection of a new house of wor- ship. It was built during the summer of 1837, and dedi- cated Jate in August or early in September. Rev. W. Weigley, then stationed at Galena, preached the dedicatory sermon, using for his text a passage from the Song of Sol- emon (chapter vi, verse 10): ‘Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?” As we look back through the years of successful conflict in connection with that Church, the text seems a prophecy. The building was thirty by forty feet, elevated on a stone foundation of suffi- cient height for a basement above ground. It was prob- ably the first edifice erected by our people in the Territory, designed exclusively for a place of worship. The church at Green Bay was buiit during the same year; but as the time of its dedication can not be ascertained, this must take precedence. In it the Rock River Conference held its second session, commencing August 25, 1841.* On the 13th of November, 1836, Rev. H. W. Frink, so long and so favorably known by us, reached a point about three miles from the present site of Green Bay City, on a sailing vessel. It was Saturday, and late in the even- ing. He says there were on board ‘‘ nine passengers, seven adults and two children. Of this number, six were mem- bers of the Methodist Episcopal Church.” As the vessel could not make the port, he and a few others whose souls longed ‘for the courts of the Lord,” found a way to reach the shore in quest of some place of worship. They were successful. The disciples there had assembled for a prayer- meeting. *The reader will remember that the immediate predeces- sor of this, as well as the mission-houses at Green Bay, were intended in part for school purposes; and the little log church at Platteville was at first a court-room. 3 34 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Mr. Frink describes this and attending circumstances thus: ‘‘The prayer-meeting was held in the only school- house and only place for religious worship, save that at the barracks at the fort. In this school-house there was preaching on the Sabbath, and prayer-meeting in the even- ing. This meeting was a very excellent one. Persons present, Colonel Samuel Ryan, George and William White, George Dorrance, John Driggs, and many others. In this house I preached my first sermon to citizens, officers, and soldiers; here I received a recommendation to the travel- ing connection; here I first formed an acquaintance with John Clark, of precious memory, presiding elder of Chi- cago District. This district was bounded on the north by Lake Superior; on the South by Ottawa, Illinois; on the east by Lake Michigan; on the west by the verge of civ- ilization.” The fort above mentioned was ‘‘ Fort Howard,” on the opposite side of the river, for a long time a military post. Mr. Frink further says: “The first quarterly meeting for the year was held on the 22d of January, 1837.” This was not only the first of that year, but the first one ever held at any point nearer than Milwaukee, and held by the same man that, on the 15th of September, 1832, formed a class of twenty-five Oneida Indians, dedi- cated the first Methodist church edifice, and held the first Methodist sacramental service on Wisconsin soil. The presiding elder secured the services of Mr. Frink for some point in Illinois, and together they started on a dreary journey for Chicago, on the 23d of January, 1837. Their way had been somewhat prepared for them by a military force. The case was, in brief, this: Fort Dear- born, in what was then the little hamlet of Chicago, had long been occupied as a United States garrison. It was built in 1803 or 1804. In 1812, about fifty who had sur- rendered to the Indians, under promise of protection, were ANNALS OF 1836, 35 massacred, and the fort destroyed. It was rebuilt in 1816, and occupied by a small army until about this time, when they were ordered to Fort Howard, at the head of Green Bay, in Wisconsin. Most of the buildings were torn down, but two remained until the great fire in 1871. The im- mense wholesale house of W. M. Hoyt & Co,, on the cor- ner of River Street and Michigan Avenue, stands on the site of the old fort. This military force cut its way through forests, whenever these were encountered, which was a large part of the distance after reaching the south- ern border of our State. This was long known as the “Military Road.” But for this road our itinerants would have found their journey far more difficult, if not utterly impossible. As it was, it did not very much resemble a trip in a palace car. The reader will appreciate this on reading a descrip- tion given by Mr. Frink of one night’s lodging. After stating that they found one of the camp-fires, made by the soldiers of large logs, still burning, he says: ‘‘ With our horses hitched to a tree, our feet to the fire, the earth for our bed, and the heavens for our house, we slept, without fear of being robbed by tramps. Though the woods were alive with wolves and other animals, they did not disturb us.” Thus was the promise verified, in which they may have trusted—‘‘ They shall dwell safely in the wilderness, and sleep in the woods.” But, unpleasant as was this trip, it was far less so than the one already described, made by Mr. Clark, from Chicago to Green Bay, in January, 1835. Comparing them, he says: ‘‘ Two years ago not an American family resided between Chicago and Milwaukee ; now the country is thickly settled by farmers, mechanics, merchants, etc., while the moral aspect of the country is really encouraging. From Milwaukee to Green Bay, by the lake road, I found a place of rest, with food for man and beast three nights.” 36 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Now (in 1890), instead of a small hamlet at Chicago, and an Indian trading-post at Milwaukee, the traveler will find one city containing a million, and another more than two hundred thousand inhabitants, with numerous villages and cities intervening, while the whole country is humming with a dense population. Early in this conference year the mission property at Menominee was sold, and the post abandoned. Such were the nomadic habits of this tribe, and such the cor- rupting influences from the rude white people that had been their only teachers for a long period, that no per- manent fruits followed our work there. Oneida and Green Bay, that had previously been sup- plied with missionaries from Eastern conferences, appear this year in the Minutes of Illinois Conference, with Daniel Poe in charge of the former, and Philip W. Nichols, of the latter. Oneida began the year with 48 members, and closed it with 82; Green Bay began with 34, and closed with 44. It should be remembered that the first class known to have been formed within our Territory was in connection with the garrison in Fort Howard; and the next was at the Indian mission near Kaukauna—both by John Clark. The former was the nucleus of the Church at Green Bay. On the 6th of September, 1836, a deed of.a lot for a church edifice was executed to a duly constituted Board of Trustees. It was in the part of the town then known as Astor, the same being a part of a large tract owned by that New York millionaire, John Jacob Astor. A house of worship was begun in 1836, and finished in 1837. It was a frame building, the second of the kind erected in the Territory, and the second of any kind built originally and exclusively for a -church by any religious denomina- tion. In size it was thirty-four by forty-eight feet, and cost about one thousand dollars. The society being weak, an embarrassing debt was incurred, which crippled them ANNALS OF 1886, 387 for about ten years, when it was sold to the French Catholics, of which more hereafter. The whole number reported at the next Conference was 478—an increase of about sixty per cent. As this year closes the official relation of that dis- tinguished minister, Rev. John Clark, to Wisconsin Meth- odism, more than a parting word is befitting. His pre- vious labors have already been sketched. He remained in charge of Chicago District the full term of four years; then the demands of the work in Texas kindled anew the old missionary fire that still burned within him, and he offered himself for that distant field. He saw toil and sacrifice before him, but these were light when duty was in the opposite scale. Texas had just thrown off the heavy Mexican yoke, and the heavier despotism of Rome. Her affairs were still in a somewhat chaotic state, but she was sighing for a better civilization and a better form of religion. On her soil was evidently to be a severe conflict between the Beast and the Lamb of Revelation, and Clark was ready for the emergency. He started on the 4th of October, 1841, in a private carriage, with wife and son, on a trip of a thousand miles, and reached San Augustine, the seat of the newly formed Texas Conference, on the eighteenth day of November. He was a delegate to the memorable General Confer- ence of 1844, and on the great question that agitated that body, voted with the North. This rendered his posi- tion in Texas very unpleasant. He returned, and became connected with the Troy Conference, with which he re- mained till 1852, when he took a transfer to Rock River Conference, and was stationed at Clark Street Church, Chicago. Here he not only perfurmed his ordinary work, with usual success, but had the rare opportunity of aiding somewhat in originating an institution that has already 388 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. been an untold blessing to the Great West, and is destined, we trust, to go on in its career of usefulness to the end of time. It was on this wise: Mrs. Eliza Garrett, a wealthy and devoted widow lady, member of his Church, desired to do something to aid young men in preparing for the min- istry. She consulted her pastor as to the most effective way to accomplish her purpose. The result was the con- secration of one hundred thousand dollars to found what is now known as Garrett Biblical Institute—a worthy monu- ment to its foundress and to her adviser. Mr. Clark cherished a desire to revisit the scenes of his missionary labors in our State, but the pressing demands of his charge prevented. He did, however, make one visit to Wisconsin. It was to dedicate the second church edifice erected by our people in Janesville, and now known as the First Church there. This was in the summer of 1853. The writer then saw him for the first and last time, and, with many others, highly appreciated his able ministration. In July, 1854, after battling with cholera symptoms for several days, he succumbed to that terrible disease, but with frequent assurances from his lips that all was well. Such a death might well be expected to follow such a life. ANNALS OF 1837. 39 CHAPTER V. 1837. WO years ago, ‘‘ Milwaukee Mission ” appeared in the Minutes of the Illinois Conference. This year we find, ‘‘ Milwaukee District, Salmon Stebbins, presiding elder.” It was entirely in Wisconsin. The pastoral charges and their appointees are here given in full: Milwaukee Mission—J. R. Goodrich, Racine—O. F. Curtiss. Sheboygan—H. W. Frink. Green Bay—P. W. Nichols. Oneida Mission—Daniel Poe. Madison—To be supplied. Aztalan—S. Pillsbury, Jesse Halstead. In the western part of the State—Mineral Point, with H. W. Reed as pastor; Helena, with Wm. Simpson; and Platteville, with J. W. McMurtry and A. H. Bonney, were in the Galena District. Bartholomew Weed was presiding elder. Mr. Weed came from the Philadelphia Conference; was in charge of Galena District, which included several appointments in Wisconsin for three years. He afterwards returned to his old Conference, and died many years ago. He was a man of commanding presence, great force of character, and good abilities. His only daughter became the wife of a Mr. Virgin, in Platteville, where she re- sided till her death, a few years since—almost a life-long member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. A new district, called Indian Mission District, was formed, of which Alfred Brunson was placed in charge. 40 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. This contained four Indian missions, one French mission, and one mission—Prairie du Chien—among the English- speaking white population. Of the latter, the presiding elder had the pastoral oversight. As to the French mis- sion, we hear nothing of it before or after this year. The Indian missions were mostly beyond the boundaries of our State. Thus marshaled, this heroic band of Christian soldiers entered upon their work, probably with expecta- tions of increasing victories. But a financial crash soon swept the country, East and West, carrying devastation everywhere. For two or three years, cities—‘“‘ paper cities”—had sprung up all over the land. The wildest speculation prevailed. A species of currency, called ‘‘ wild-cat money,” had deluged the country, and thus many accounted themselves rich, not because they had silver, or gold, or houses, or lands, but promises to pay by irresponsible parties, and fancied corner-lots in cities that were never built. The ‘“‘erash” utterly annihilated the supposed value of all these possessions, and left almost every one very poor. This severely checked immigration and all healthful enter- prise. Of course, the young societies were everywhere greatly embarrassed ; the preachers were poorly paid, nor could they push out into the regions beyond as they had planned, yet, like true heroes as they were, they fought bravely in the circumstances, and won trophies for the Master, as their reports show. Unfortunately for Milwaukee, their pastor was com- pelled to resign his charge about the middle of the year, on account of failing health. But the little flock was not left entirely uncared for. Providence had brought Jared Thomson, a Jocal preacher, into the vicinity, and he sup- plied them the rest of the year. Racing, now one of our best appointments, first ap- pears in the list this year. It seems to take the place of ANNALS OF 1837, 41 Root River Circuit of the previous year, as the French name of “root” is racine, and as the former does not ap- pear as an appointment. O. F. Curtiss was in charge. Just where or by whom Methodism was introduced in Racine, it is difficult to decide. And strangely, the date of the formation of the first class there, can not be ascertained. At the Conference of 1836, Samuel Pillsbury was ap- pointed to Root River Circuit, which evidently included Racine. Indeed, it is probable that both indicated the same territory. It seems quite safe, therefore, to assume that Mr. Pillsbury preached there as early as the fall of 1836. But there is good reason to suppose that he was antedated by Wm. See, a local preacher. He joined the Illinois Conference in 1825, traveled two years with good success, and then located. About 1830 he removed to Chicago, and was the Government blacksmith in Fort Dearborn. He was still a preacher, and his name appears as a member of the first class in that city. About 1835 he settled on Root (or Racine) River, about two miles from its mouth, built a mill, and afterwards became one of the first class formed in Racine. As all accounts of him show that he was an active Christian, it is quite prob- able that he preached more or less there, and thus pre- pared the way for a new circuit. The last account we have of this pioneer is, that he removed to the vicinity of Dodgeville, was useful in various ways, and died in 1859.* *Tt is impossible to decide with certainty either as to the time when the first sermon was preached there, or by whom it was preached. From a paragraph in “Illustrated History of Methodism,” pp. 588-9, it would seem that Jesse Walker, preached at Root River, supposed to be at or near what is now Racine, as early as 1834. No mention is made of results. But John Clark, who pioneered the country in 1855, says there was not an American family between Chicago and Milwaukee. It is therefore probable that Mr. Walker visited a point on Root River, some distance from Racine. 42 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. The names of those constituting the first class there, so far as known, were Paul Kingston and wife, Wm. See and wife, Harrison R. Fay and wife, A. Filer and wife, Stephen Campbell and wife. From this small beginning has grown a strong, influential Church. It used to be said, “Go where you will in Wisconsin, you will find some one who was converted in the Methodist Church at Racine.” From it have gone out several preachers, among whom— and the only one now in our ranks—is J. L. Hewitt, pre- siding elder on Milwaukee District. SHEBOYGAN was a new appointment, embracing an im- mense area of dense wilderness, with the exception of here and there a small settlement. The preacher was a new man, both in the Conference and in the itinerancy itself— H. W. Frink. He had but recently come from the East as a local preacher, and settled at Green Bay, then called Navareino, as already described. His appointment to such a field—a field in which there was not a religious organi- zation of any kind, and, perhaps, not a decidedly religious person—was surely a severe test of his fidelity to the call of duty. ‘ Among his appointments were, Sheboygan, Manitowoc, Brothertown, Stockbridge, which latter he could reach only by way of Green Bay. Surely this was a circuit of “magnificent distances.” But he was equal to the demand. He labored on for many years faithfully and well. Much of the time he was in frontier work, and his visits carried sunshine to many a household. He was probably one of the best pastors we ever had in this Conference. He is now entirely superannuated, residing at Burnett Junction, in his last pastoral charge, highly esteemed by all who know him. The first session of the Wisconsin Territorial Legisla- ture was held at Belmont, six or eight miles east of ANNALS OF 1837, 43 Platteville, commencing October 25, 1836; and on the 23d of November following, Madison was selected the cap- ital of the Territory. It was very natural, therefore, for the missionary genius of our itinerancy to plan for its spir- itual welfare. Accordingly, at the next Conference (1837), it appears in the list of appointments ‘‘ to be supplied.” AZTALAN, an honored name in our annals, embraced an immense territory hitherto unexplored, even by the almost ubiquitous Methodist itinerant. Indeed, Messrs. Pillsbury and Halstead scarcely knew any bounds to their work. They traversed the entire Rock River Valley, in Wis- consin, and extended their appointments as far to the east and south as Prairieville (aow Waukesha), East Troy, Elk- horn, Burlington, and Janesville. Thus they sowed the seed of the kingdom over a wide field, from which was gathered a good harvest in following years. Of this, that year’s toil was an earnest, for we find sixty-two members at the close of the year where there were probably none at the beginning. HELENA was a new pastoral charge, set off from Min- eral Point Circuit of the previous year. Each of these places received a new man—the former, William Simpson ; the latter, H. W. Reed, both of whom will appear in future pages. Helena was a point on Wisconsin River, quite isolated, and so significantly named. Rev. J. Crum- mer, referring to the preceding year, says: ‘“‘It was be- lieved that there was not a white family between us and -the Selkirk settlement of the north.” He further says: ‘‘On preaching night everything was put in fine order, and the preacher treated to the best there was.” The main industry was a shot-factory, owned by a local preacher, not a resident of the place, who paid fifty to seventy-five dollars a year to sustain preaching there. The circuit included Blue Mounds and some other points. For some cause the preachers on Platteville Circuit 44 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. both left the work somewhat early in this year, and J. Crummer, who served there a part of the previous year, but had passed beyond our bounds, was called back to this field. It involved labor enough for two strong men; but this indomitable worker managed, by the aid of two or three local preachers, to push the conquests of the Cross successfully to the close of the year. The circuit seems to have been even larger than the previous year. He had at least one appointment in what is now the State of Iowa, and also extended his work northward to regions beyond. We of the present time may be more reconciled to what seems a little hard, by noting some of the inci- dents of those days. A few must suffice. Blue River, now Montfort, was a mining-camp. Mr. Crummer soon made his way there, being the first preacher on the ground. He found a “smart sprinkle” of Cornish people. They assembled—mostly men—to hear preaching for the first time in those ‘‘ends of the earth.” When the hymn was announced, they joined in and sang with a gusto that indicated a familiarity with that kind of wor- ship, and doubtless greatly helped the preacher. He formed a class, and slept sweetly in a miner’s bunk. But his horse—faithful traveling companion—did not fare as well. There being no stable, he was tied to a tree, and during the night a heavy fall of snow made his lot very uncomfortable. It really was enough to make some horses leave the itinerancy. But he remained true to his master, as his master to the work. On one occasion he was all one cold winter day on horseback, traveling from this to another appointment. Not a family resided between the two points. At another time, while preaching in a log school-house, he noticed a little uneasiness, and presently a large blacksnake was drawn out from between the logs and dispatched by one of his hearers. Whether this was a direct descendant of a ANNALS OF 1857. 45 similar animal that once infested Eden or not, the preacher went on bruising the head of him who is symbolized by that ancient intruder. At another time still, night overtook him as he reached an Indian’s cabin, and he was compelled to ‘turn in.” The family seemed to make him welcome in broken En- glish, but everything indicated filth, if not something worse. Supper was soon ready, and he was cordially in- vited to partake. It consisted mainly of fish, boiled as taken from the water. He dared not refuse, but his ap- petite did not crave a very large portion of it. Certain domestic animals of different kinds that occasionally awaken considerable interest, abounded in some of the huts in which the itinerant of those days was obliged to lodge. Though they stuck ‘closer than a brother,” they really were enemies, and no amount of heroism could overcome the dread of their attacks. Not unfrequently were the houses so open that a driving snow-storm in the night would cover the bed of a sleeper with a white blanket several inches thick. Mr. Crummer describes several kinds of corn-bread made in those days. One kind was called ‘‘ dodgers ;” they were made of corn-meal and cold water (possibly a little salt), well manipulated into oval balls, and baked very hard. He thinks he has seen them so hard that a ‘‘strong arm could knock down a year-old steer with one of them at a distance of ten paces.” Some may think this is worse than the hard-tack marked ‘‘B. C.,” that regaled our ‘‘ Boys in Blue.” This year of toil on Platteville Circuit was quite suc- cessful. Among those who entered upon a new life were at least two who became itinerant ministers. These were T. M. Fullerton and F. T. Mitchell. The circumstances attending the conversion of the former were these: Mr. Crummer was on his way to an appointment in ‘‘ Snake 46 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Hollow,” a mining camp that abounded in vile conduct, stimulated by the fire-water of death; and as he ap- proached, there was an outcry, ‘‘ Here comes the Meth- odist preacher!” At once there appeared on the scene a drunken, howling mob. Some threw stones, others rolled whisky-barrels into the street, and altogether the uproar seemed somewhat like that at Ephesus when the great god- dess Diana was in danger of being ‘‘set at naught.” The preacher’s horse, called by his owner, ‘ Judge,” showed more opposition to the whisky-barrels, though empty, than some modern judges do to those well filled. The preacher reached the place of meeting unscathed, and in no wise daunted by the bacchanalian outburst. The Lord attended the word, and from that hour young Fullerton commenced to seek the Savior.* Young Mitchell was converted at a camp-meeting, the first, it is supposed, ever held within the present bound- aries of our State. This was near the Big Platte River. So successful was it that the brethren fitted up a ground for another near Platteville, and a meeting was held there the same fall, attended by several preachers on their return from the Annual Conference. This will be more fully noticed in the annals of next year. The total membership, as reported at the next Con- ference, was 564—an increase of eighty-six. *Tn an obituary notice of this excellent minister, in the Northwestern Christian Advocate of January 22, 1890, he is said to have been converted and joined the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1840. This is not in conflict with the former state- ment. Intelligent Methodists have never considered commenc- ing to seek the Savior as all that is meant by Scriptural conver- sion. Mr. Fullerton probably entered upon a praying life at the former date, and experienced the infusion of spiritual life at the latter. ANNALS OF 1838-9. 47 CHAPTER VI. 1838-9. HE Minutes this year present but few important changes. The districts are the same, and manned as last year. Sheboygan and Aztalan disappear. The territory in- dicated by the former was probably abandoned on account of the great financial distress already described. That in- cluded in the latter took the name of Honey Creek. This place was a long distance from Aztalan. But, as the reader will remember, those zealous pioneers, Pillsbury and Halstead, covered nearly all the country with ‘‘ labors abundant,” from Aztalan to the southern boundary of Wisconsin. It is not strange, therefore, that a more eli- gible point for the head of the circuit was developed. Mr. Pillsbury was continued in charge of the work, with J. F. Flanders as colleague. Fort Winnebago was connected with Madison as a mission, and John Hodges was pastor. Deansbury and Fond du Lac also appear as a mission ‘to be supplied.” W. Wigley was appointed to Milwaukee; 8S. P. Keyes to Green Bay; H. W. Reed to Oneida; Thomas P. Lopas to Mineral Point; John Crummer to Helena; and Isaac J. Stewart to Platteville. The second camp-meeting held on Platteville Circuit, alluded to on a previous page, was a great success. The Church in the growing village was very much improved in numbers and spiritual power. Among the interesting features of it was the presence of 48 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Jason Lee, missionary in Oregon, accompanied by two Flat Head Indians from that far-off land. Though this incident did not contribute largely to the history of Methodism in Wisconsin, such was the influence of the Oregon Mission upon our Church at large, upon Christianity in general, and upon the physical structure of our country, that a brief account of its origin will be acceptable at this point. The Divine hand was as conspicuous in this as in open- ing the way to send Christian missionaries to the Sand- wich Islands fifteen years before. Comparatively little was known of our great country west of the Rocky Mount- ains until within the last sixty or seventy years. McKen- zie, sent out by the British. Government, and subsequently Lewis and Clarke, under the authority of the United States, demonstrated the possibility of a transit over land to the Pacific Coast, and awakened considerable interest in that Great Northwest. And though their expeditions were for political purposes, the Ruler of the world was directing results. It seems that two of the Flat Heads were taken back by McKenzie to Montreal, and educated slightly in a Roman Catholic school. They returned to their native land, and tried as best they could to instruct their breth- ren in the Christian religion. But as their own light was dim, and obscured by the superstitions of Romanism, their efforts seemed to produce no special effect except to awaken a desire to know more about it than these youth could tell them. This desire was greatly increased by what seems an accidental circumstance. By some means a white man— by name unknown to history—made his way into their country. After attending some of their religious festivals, and observing their devotions, mixed with ridiculous folly, he ventured to tell some of them that they were wrong in ANNALS OF 1838-9, 49 their views of the Great Spirit; that he did not require such worship. They received this kindly. Then he pro- ceeded to tell them further that there was a people toward the ‘‘rising sun” that knew all about the true God, and how to worship him; and that he had given them a Book from which they had learned all this. They became so interested that they convened a council, deliberated on the subject, and decided to send a deputation of four to obtain the ‘‘ Book that told of the white man’s God.” They entered upon their perilous journey of about three thousand miles through the dismal dells and over the snow-capped peaks of the Rockies, and reached St. Louis in the latter part of 1832 or the beginning of 1833. Providentially, General Clarke, who, in 1805, accompanied Lewis in a similar dreary journey, was the Indian agent there. They were brought to him. He was interested for them, and gave them such verbal instruction as he could touching the object of their inquiry, but did not seem to meet their desires. Unfortunately they soon came under the influence of the Roman Catholics, who then largely dominated the city. They renewed their re- quest for the ‘‘ Book,” but instead, they tried to satisfy them with their mummery. All their efforts failed for the time. Two of their number died there; the others re- turned without the ‘‘ Book,” and knowing little more of the white man’s God than when they came. Wm. Barrows, a writer in the Oregon, a paper pub- lished in that State, referring to this wonderful event, calls it a failure. We will see. There was a ceremonial leave- taking, at which one of the survivors made a farewell ad- dress, as follows: “‘T came to you over a trail of many moons from the setting sun. You were the friend of my fathers, who have all gone the long way. I came with one eye partly opened for more light for my people, who sit in darkness. 4 50 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. I go back with both eyes closed. How can I go back blind to my blind people? J made my way to you with strong arms, through many enemies and strange lands, that I might carry back much to them. I go back with both arms broken and empty. The two fathers who came with us, the braves of many winters and wars, we leave asleep here by your great waters and wigwam. They were tired in many moons, and their moccasins wore out. My people sent me to get the white man’s Book of heaven. You took me where you allow your women to dance, as we do not ours, and the Book was not there. You showed me the images of good spirits, and pictures of the good land beyond, but the Book was not among them to tell us the way. J am going back the long sad trail to my peo- ple of the dark land. When I tell my poor, blind people, after one more snow, in the big council, that I did not bring the Book, no word will be spoken by our old men or by our young braves. One by one they will rise up and go out in silence. My people will be in darkness, and they will go on the long path to the other bunting-grounds. No white man will go with them, and no white man’s Book to make the way plain.” Though this speech, surpassed by few in any age or land in all that constitutes true eloquence, did not bring immediate relief to these eager inquirers after truth, their mission was not a “failure,” as Mr. Barrows supposes. The account of it soon got into the papers. Dr. Wilber Fisk, then in his prime, made a stirring appeal through the Christian Advocate. The heart of the Church pulsated with sympathy. This Macedonian cry rung in ears that had been dull of hearing. It echoed and re-echoed all through the land. The mission of Cox to Africa, and that of Clark to Green Bay, had increased the missionary spirit in our Church; but this seemed to intensify it more than any thing before. ANNALS OF 1838-9, 51 Soon two young men, Jason and Daniel Lee—uncle and nephew—offered themselves as missionaries to that people. They were accepted; and, after spending some time in still further arousing the Church to the work of evangelizing the world, they started, and about the 1st of May, 1834, they left the border of civilization on horse- back, and reached Oregon in September following. In the summer of 1838, Mr. Jason Lee returned for a short time to the East, bringing with him three young Flat Heads, traveled quite extensively through the country, and thus gave another impetus to the missionary cause. The writer well remembers the interest awakened in Cen- tral New York, where he heard him; and so it probably was everywhere. Even in this then new country, and though largely missionary ground, his visits and the pres- ence of his Indian converts, who spoke broken English, but could tell something of what the ‘‘ Book” and the religion it taught had done for them, produced a great sensation, aud kindled anew the missionary flame, especially at this camp-meeting. The presence of these and other missionaries in Oregon, led there by this wonderful providence, unquestionably saved all the territory to the United States included in the States of Washington, Oregon, and about one-half of Cal- ifornia. The Hudson Bay Company had claimed it for Great Britain, and that claim was about to be ratified by the authorities at Washington, when a missionary, who made his way by almost superhuman effort through the unbroken forest, reached the National Capital. The in- formation he imparted saved that vast and valuable region to our country. The name of this hero was Whitman, a medical missionary. (For further information see ‘‘ Build- ing the Nation,” published by Harper Brothers, pages 371-386.) During the winter of 1838-9 a charter was obtained 52 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. for an academic institution in Racine; and soon after, during the same session of the Legislature, another was secured for one at Platteville, through the efforts of Major Rountree, a member from that place. A school was opened there at once, and continued as an academy till it was elevated to the rank of a State normal school. Two years elapsed before the one at Racine was commenced. Of its career the writer has no knowledge. Mr. Wigley thought it best to visit Milwaukee before moving his family. He found the brethren so disheartened and embarrassed by the financial pressure, that they did not think they could pay his moving expenses. This in- terview closed their relations, and the place was supplied, as a part of the preceding year had been, by Jared Thomp- son. This was very disastrous to Milwaukee; not because Mr. Thompson was not a faithful, good man—he was, in- deed, and a man of good natural ability—but he resided nearly ten miles away, was obliged to spend most of his time in hard manual Jabor, and could not look after the pressing interests of the Church. Little or no pastoral work was done; sometimes funerals were attended by lay- men, and even the Sabbath services suffered greatly. One who was on the ground says that ‘‘the appointments were sometimes filled by another local preacher, sometimes by exhorters; and where no one came to officiate, Brother Wm. A. Kellogg used to pray with the congregation, sing, and then dismiss them.” In these circumstances it is not strange that the young society diminished to thirty-five during the year. Indeed, this seems not to have been a very successful year gen- erally, as most of the charges reported a decrease. The unparalleled financial distress that had overwhelmed the country still embarrassed the work. Racine, Honey Creek, Helena, and Platteville, each had an increase, so that there was an aggregate gain of eighty-six. ANNALS OF 1838-9. 53 The first record of a Quarterly Conference at Oneida Mission, that has been preserved, appears this year. The body convened December 29, 1838, and consisted of the presiding elder, the missionary, three local preachers, and eight other official members, and the business seems to have been done very correctly. There is also a minute inven- tory of property belonging to the mission, some articles being appraised at twelve and a-half cents. 1839. The Conference Minutes for 1839 show fourteen pas- toral charges, in place of eleven of the previous year, which, though not a large increase, was an indication of fair progress, considering the condition of the country. Julius Field was in charge of Milwaukee District, ‘Cand the station was supplied by Rev. David Brayton, a su- perannuated member of the Troy Conference. During the winter of 1839-40 there was an effort made to erect a church.” A plan was formed for one sixty by forty feet. A very eligible site was donated by Hon. Morgan L. Martin, on Main Street (now Broadway), between Oneida and Biddle Streets, and some preparations were made for building. But a few began to talk as some did in the days of Haggai: ‘‘The time is not come, the time that the Lord’s house should be built.” This unwise counsel prevailed, so that little was done that year except to cut down the plan to fifty by thirty-five feet—a step backward, against the strong protest of the presiding elder and Leverett S. Kellogg, a prominent layman, of whom more will appear. At the following Conference eighty-nine members were reported—an increase of fifty-four. Southport, now and for many years called Kenosha, makes its first appearance in the Minutes, not as an inde- pendent appointment, but as an adjunct to Racine, with 54 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Salmon Stebbins as pastor. But this was not the begin- ning of its religious history. Late in May, or early in June, 1835, Jonathan Pierce came, with his family, in the ‘‘ first wagon that ever rolled through the Indian village” near by, and settled on the present site of Kenosha, then called Pike River. He was a devoted Christian and Methodist. He was the only white man in that vicinity, but others soon came. So far as appears, no congenial spirit came to the place until the second day of August following, when Austin Kellogg, with his wife and five children, landed from a schooner, and were scattered along the Pike River beach. It was Sabbath afternoon. As his religion was the kind that “bears transportation,” he began at once to look around for a religious meeting. He soon found Mr. Pierce, and they arranged fur a prayer-meeting the next Sabbath. On that day, August 9, 1835, they held the first prayer-meet- ing in the place. They must have been agreeably sur- prised to find twenty-eight persons in attendance—nearly every white settler—and more so to see that twenty-one took some part in the services. They also then and there formed a Sabbath-school. They thus showed that they were there for a higher purpose than worldly speculation. Though religious meetings of some sort were held every Sabbath, no class was formed till 1837. During the interim they rarely had preaching. Rev. Mark Robinson, so far as appears (the preacher on Milwaukee Circuit in 1835) preached the first sermon there. His successor also, Rey. William Crissey, it seems, gave the place a little ministerial labor. a Some time in the year 1837 the Pike River class was formed, consisting of ten persons, viz.: Rev. R. M. Demming, Austin Kellogg, Armenia Kellogg, Jonathan Pierce, Charles Durkee, Mrs. Charles Durkee, Mrs. Harvey Durkee, John W. Dana, Martha E. Dana, and Susan Dana. The class was ANNALS OF 1839. 55 formed by Mr. Demming, then a local preacher. He had been for a time connected with some Eastern Confer- ence. In his new home for many years he rendered val- uable service to the Church. Austin Kellogg was the leader. He belonged to a large family whose name is in- timately and honorably connected with the early history of Methodism in Wisconsin. Charles Durkee was after- wards a United States senator from our State for six years. After the Conference of 1837, the place (its name having been changed to Southport) formed a part of Racine Circuit, though its name did not appear in the Minutes till two years later. The first quarterly meeting held in Southport commenced November 4, 1837, 5. Steb- bins, presiding elder, and O. F. Curtiss, preacher in charge. During the ensuing winter, a very extensive revival of religion swept the place, ‘‘resulting in the conversion of nearly the entire community.” The fruits of it were seen in various ways. It gave the place a healthy moral tone, as nothing else could, and thus aided it in all proper business matters. Because the Christian religion imposes restraints to the greed and dishonest speculations of men, they often think it unfriendly to their worldly interests. But really, in the highest and best sense, ‘‘ godliness has promise of the life that now is.” So it proved in this case. The young society, thus re-enforced, began to make preparaton for erecting ‘‘a house for the Lord,” and suc- ceeded, as we shall see in due time. Green Bay was under the pastoral care of A. Chenoeth. Oneida was left to be supplied; but J. Halstead, who was appointed to Deansburg (an early name for Brother- town), was removed by the presiding elder to Oneida. No Church organization seems to have been effected in Deans- 56 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. burg as yet, though there had been occasional preaching in the place for some time. The Stockbridge Indians were in a transition state from a tribal government to American citizenship. To us, at this distance, that seems a very im- portant period in their history, and one that should have been seized with great avidity to bring them under gospel influences. During this year the church at Oneida was dedicated. The following is a copy of the dedicatory proceedings, so far as their legal bearings are concerned, as found in the Records of the Mission: ‘“‘In the name and in behalf of our people, we here present the land laid off for the building of this house, and all that we have done to complete the same to Gods to be used as a holy place for religious worship, according to the order of the Methodist Episcopal Church, for the benefit of this Nation. oa JACOB CoRNELIUS, Signed by 15 onn CoRNELIUS. ( Tuomas Loprick, + His mark. | Jonn Cooper, + His mark. “Chiefs, { Isaac Jonnson, -+ His mark. | Homer Smrra, -+ His mark. (Moses Cornetius, -+ His mark. ! “ Oneida West, January 4, 1840. ‘In the name and in behalf of the Missionary Society, J here present this house as a holy place for religious wor- ship, according to the order of the Methodist Episcopal Church, for the benefit of this Nation. «Signed by Juuius Frevp, “Superintendent of Missions. “ Oneida West, January 4, 1840.” Madison was again left to be supplied. Fort Winnebago, a military post between Fox and ANNALS OF 1839. 57 Wisconsin Rivers (near Portage City), was in charge of S. P. Keyes. Apparently, but little was accomplished in either place, as from the former only three members were reported ; from the latter, none. Still, necessary preparations may have been made for future success. The pastoral work, known as Honey Creek, the pre- ceding year, appears now as Walworth, embracing, it seems, all the settlements in that county, and was in care of J. McKean. Watertown appears this year in the list of appoint- ments, but it does not indicate entirely ney ground. It took in the northern part of what was Aztalan Circuit of 1837 (called in 1838 Honey Creek), and left all the country, east and southeast, as far as Lake Michigan, to be explored. H. W. Frink was appointed to pioneer this region; and well did he perform his work. Amid great difficulties, he penetrated the wilderness to Menominee, Wauwatosa, and .other points in that region, forming classes in various places, as will be noted in due time. Thus, at the close of the year, his circuit extended from the boundaries of Madison and Fort Winnebago charges to the lake, as far south as Waukesha and Milwaukee, embracing everything in its sweep but the latter place. The appointments in the western part of the State were still embraced in Galena District, with B. Weed, presiding elder. They were as follows: Prairie du Chien—Wm. Simpson. Platteville—H. W. Reed and J. G. Whitford. Mineral Point—J. Hodges. Helena—John Crummer. By some subsequent arrangement the two places last named were united in one circuit, with John Crummer in charge. The returns of this year show far greater gains in mem- 5 58 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. * bers in the mineral region than in the eastern part of the State. Perhaps this is due largely to the circumstance that the hard times affected it less. Speculation seems not to have run as wild; and, then, their mineral basis was greatly in their favor. The following incident will give the reader another view of the way our early itinerants followed up the tide of immigration: Though Helena Circuit embraced all the region east and west between Mineral Point and Madison, and north and south between the Pecatonica and Wiscon- sin Rivers, yet the preacher, J. Crummer, whose push and heroism have already been indicated, on hearing of some settlers on Sauk Prairie, north of Wisconsin River, started off in the usual style of a Methodist preacher in those days, on a trip of thirty miles or more, with only one house between, to preach to them the word of life. On reaching that house, he was told that it was impossible to get across the river, as the ferry-boat was on the other side, and he could not make the people there hear him call. To confirm this, it was added that ‘‘Rev. Mr. Quaw went there a day or two before, and hallooed till hoarse, and then turned away to Madison.” But the intrepid Crum- mer replied: ‘‘ We Methodists can make more noise than the Presbyterians.” The man, seeing his determination, replied: ‘(I can suggest a plan that will get you over. There is a cabin at such a point; into this put your horse. At another point you will find a scythe hidden away; with this cut grass for your horse. Now, at another point you will find a canoe under the bank.” Then look- ing doubtfully at the preacher, he added: ‘‘There is no paddle—you will have to carry one.” No time can be safely lost. Twenty miles without a vestige of civilization, and a wide, rapid stream lie between him and the place of his destination. Almost instantly he mounts his faithful “Judge,” with a paddle fastened ANNALS OF 1839, 59 to his saddle-tow, and speeds for the river. He finds everything as described, plus the kind of mosquitoes of which ‘‘a great many weigh a pound,” and reached the prairie before night. The next day the whole settlement came to hear the word of the Lord preached. At this service a class was organized, but of how many composed the writer is not informed. This was evidently the begin- ning of our work on Sauk Prairie. On the Platteville work there was a very extensive re- vival. This was especially true of the west end of the circuit, then called Snake Hollow, on account of the im- mense number of congealed rattlesnakes taken from a min- eral cave; but afterwards named Potosi, after a South American city, because of the abundance of mineral de- posits there. Numbers reported, 965. The total gain for the year in the thirteen appoint- ments was 243—about thirty-three and a third per cent. 60 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. CHAPTER VII. 1840-1. T the eighth delegated General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, in May, 1840, the Illinois Conference was divided, thus forming a new Con- ference, called Rock River, which included the northern portion of the State of Illinois and all the Territory of Wisconsin, together with the Indian missions of the Upper Mississippi, wherever located. Henceforth, therefore, for eight years, the reader will understand that Wisconsin Methodism was under the tutelage of Rock River Confer- ence. At the close of the list of appointments of Illinois Conference for 1839 we find the following: ““ Question: When and where shall our neat Conference be held? Illinois Conference at ‘Springfield, Sangamon County, Illinois; Wisconsin Conference at Pine Creek, Ogle County, Illinois; the times to be published in the Advocate, after General Conference.” From this it is evident that the first plan was to name the new Conference after our Territory, but finally it was called “‘ Rock River.” At the first session of that Confer- ence, held in August following, all the appointments in Wisconsin were included in Platteville and Milwaukee Dis- tricts—the former in charge of H. W. Reed, the latter of Julius Field. There were seventeen pastoral charges, call- ing for the labor of twenty-two ministers. If we take into account the Indian missions above mentioned, nine more men will be added to the working force. ANNALS OF 1840-1, 61 Platteville District was one of ‘‘ magnificent distances,” extending from near the southwest corner of the Territory to Green Bay. To pass from one of these points to the other involved nearly two hundred miles of travel. And be it remembered there were no railroads or steamboats to make the trip expeditious and comfortable. Even human habitations were very rare, and the few that existed could give but poor accommodation to the traveler. It is not mere poetry, however, to say that the ‘‘ spaces were beau- tiful.” They were literally so when, from May to October, an endless variety of prairie-flowers greeted the eye in all directions. Platteville was left ‘‘to be supplied.” This was not on account of its feeblenesss, for it had 265 members— the largest number reported from any circuit in the Terri- tory. The supply was Rufus Spaulding, a returned mis- sionary from Africa. Lancaster, the seat of Grant County, first appears this year in the Minutes. It was probably included the pre- ceding year in Platteville Circuit; but now, in connec- tion with Prairie du Chien, seems to embrace all the northern part of the county, and everything north of Wis- consin River except the Indian missions. To this circuit two preachers were appointed —William Simpson and A. M. Early. At the close of the year they reported 175 members. With Mineral Point was connected this year Wyota, thus forming a large circuit, in charge of J. G. Whitford, with ‘‘one to be supplied.” It was a year of general prosperity. From the two places 176 members were returned. Monroe, the seat of Green County, takes a permanent place among the appointments of this year, with James Ash, just received on trial in the Conference, as its pastor. It seems to have been formed entirely from new territory ; . 62 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. and, if so, the success of the year was remarkable, as 183 members were reported at the next Conference. Very little fruit appears as yet from the labor at Mad- ison. The year began with three members, and closed with eleven. This is utterly unaccountable. It was the capital of the Territory, and had been in the Minutes for the three previous years. Two of those years it was left to be supplied. But this ought not to mean, left to take care of itself. The other year of the three it was con- nected with Fort Winnebago, more than thirty miles dis- tant. This was a military post, and whatever good was accomplished by our labors there, the Great Day must reveal, as no report from there is to be found. The fort occupied a part of the present site of Portage City, and was constructed by the arch-traitor, Jeff Davis, soon after his graduation from West Point, where he was educated by the Nation he afterwards stabbed and tried to destroy. Fond du Lac, which stood connected with Deansburg (Brothertown) two years before, again comes to view, and is apparently the head-quarters of a circuit which includes the last-named place, that noble man, Jesse Halstead, be- ing pastor. In the winter following, the Deansburg por- tion of the work was visited with a great outpouring of the Spirit. Many were converted, a Church formed, and ‘a large number received on probation.” He was assisted by a local preacher by the name of Smith, father of Rev. Chas. Smith, a superannuate of Wisconsin Conference. They continued, like ‘‘ true yoke-fellows,” ‘‘in labors abun- dant” through that year and the next. H. R. Colman, just transferred from the Troy Confer- ence, in the State of New York, was appointed to Oneida. Green Bay was left without a preacher, at their own request—a very unwise thing, probably. When the body can remain vigorous without food, a Church can without the ordinances of religion. The presiding elder put Mr. ANNALS OF 1840-1. 63 Colman in charge of the Church at Green Bay till he could procure a supply. He preached there, once in three weeks, till about the 1st of January, 1841, when the serv- ices of Boyd Phelps, formerly of Indiana Conference, were secured for the rest of the year. Notwithstanding the people were so faint-hearted at the beginning, the year closed with an increase of more than furty per cent in the membership. The incumbent of Milwaukee District has already been mentioned. John Crummer, who had been laboring for two years in the mineral region, was appointed to the station. Soon after his arrival the society were compelled to leave the building they had occupied for some time as a place of worship, and, indeed were subjected to several removals within a few months. ‘‘ Notwithstanding these inconven- iencies, the congregations were large and the membership punctual and energetic.” They evidently disliked that kind of itinerancy; so they set about the work of finish- ing the church edifice. The Building Committee, consist- ing of Leverett S. Kellogg, Geo. F. Austin, and Jacob L. Bean, pushed it with vigor, and on the 28th of May, 1841, it was dedicated as a place of sacred worship by Presiding Elder Field and the pastor. Though there was a little relief from the financial press- ure, the preachers, as well as the people, were compelled to live on short allowances. Take one example: Mr. Crummer was a single man, and, though he had a per- manent place for his study and lodging, he boarded among the members—now with one family awhile, and then with another. He had some appointments out of town, and, of course, would be likely to spend the night with some one in the neighborhood after an evening service. Break- fasting one morning with a family in one of those places, he, with them, made a meal of bread, onions, and salt. After family devotions, which he enjoyed better than his 64 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. breakfast, ‘‘the good man of the house” took a small box from a shelf, ‘‘ when out dropped nails, screws, buttons, and among the rest a half dellar. He asked his pastor to take out one shilling—the rest he wanted to pay for mend- ing his boots.” But the pastor, soon after leaving the house, met a boy that he deemed more needy than himself, and gave him the shilling. This was doubtless an extreme case, even for those days, yet it emphasizes the unques- tionable fact that the country was still under great financial pressure. Root River Circuit, formed this year, seems to have been made up, in part, of territory taken both from Mil- waukee and Racine, of the former year. Henry Whitehead, a new man, was appointed to the new circuit. But it should be remembered that the preachers in those days were not confined within exact boundaries. They went to ‘the regions beyond,” and won territory by conquest. To Racine was appointed L. F. Moulthrop, another new man in our work. Southport became a separate appointment, with 8. Stebbins as pastor. During this year the best church edi- fice in the Territory was completed. It had a seating ca- pacity of three hundred and fifty, and was valued at five thousand dollars But, as we shall see, it was owned by a stock company, and hence can not be regarded at this time a3 a Methodist Church. It was, however, designed and occupied by the society as their place of worship. Walworth Circuit disappears; but in its place come Burlington and Rochester—D. Worthington, pastor; and Troy, with J. McKean, and one to be supplied. Sidney Wood was appointed to Watertown, and H. W. Frink to Summit, a new circuit, formed in part from Watertown. The work of this year shows an increase in member- ship of 596. ANNALS OF 1841, 65 1841. The work is now expanding so rapidly that it is im- practicable to mention each charge and its incumbent, as heretofore. New men, new circuits, and changes in bound- aries, together with incidents connected with the progress of the work, will continue to claim attention. Potosi, the scene of a great revival the preceding year while connected with Platteville, now with Lancaster, becomes a new circuit, to which were appointed Enos P. Wood and Joseph Hurlburt, two new men in the work. The principal event that attended the Church at Platte- ville this year was the second session of the Rock River Conference, which began August 25,1841. This indicates that the charge had attained considerable prominence. Though Lancaster was taken from Prairie du Chien this year, to the latter place alone were appointed two preachers—A. Brunson and C. A. Wager, a new man. Mineral Point stands alone in the Minutes, with J. G. Whitford as pastor. Duriug the latter part of this Con- ference year a church edifice was erected. It was built of stone, of suitable dimensions to meet the demands of the place for several years. It has been supposed by many that a small church was built there in 1834, and so firmly was this believed that during a session of the West Wis- consin Conference there, several years ago, a jubilant com- memoration of the event was held, and canes made of the wood which was said to have been a part of the old build- ing were presented, with due ceremony, to certain honored brethren in the ministry. Others think all this was a mistake; that no church was built in Mineral Point till 1841.* *Though this is not a very important matter in itself,such has been the interest in it that a summary of the information in possession of the writer is here given: 66 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Soon after the dedication of the new church a gracious revivalcommenced. Itis thus described in a letter from Mr. Whitford: ‘The blessed Holy Spirit began its saving work upon the hearts of the people. Seekers kept joining the Church until I found it necessary to form a new class. I proposed to take the new class and called for volunteers. I think all the new members came to my class, the major- ity of which were unconverted. At the first meeting the Spirit of God moved so powerfully upon the hearts of the people I could not hear them for their cries for mercy. So I called them to their knees, and before we arose six were converted. Some were overpowered, and could not rise. At the next class four more were set at liberty; and the work continued until fifty were added to the church.” This was after the old style. A good degree of the Jerusalem fire and power were evidently there. The deaf- 1. Rev. Jas. Lawson (the writer of ‘‘ Part Third” of this volume), while stationed there in 1870-1, was told by several that a small log chapel was built there in 1834. 2. Dr. A. Brunson, in his ‘“ Western Pioneer,” Volume II, says: ‘‘ At my first visit to Mineral Point, in 1835, we met in a log chapel that had been built the previous year, and was the first Methodist, as well as Protestant, church built in what is now the State of Wisconsin.” 3. Rev. A. D. Field, in a letter to the writer, says that while teaching school there, in 1848, a brother told him of the dedication of a church there by Richard Haney, in 1836 or 1837, and that his sermon on the occasion was considered a very remarkable one. 4. Rev. H. W. Reed, pastor there during the Conference year 1837-8, speaks of preaching in a log building, a little out of the more thickly settled part of the village, which he thinks was built for a church, but also thinks it was occupied for other purposes. He says: ‘I can not be as positive as I would like to be.” He resided about thirty miles distant. Now, though a part of this information is traditional, which is also conflicting (one tradition placing the matter in 1834, ANNALS OF 1841, 67 ening cries for mercy were no more confusion than the many tongues on the day of Pentecost. And the ‘ over- powering” Spirit was just what may be experienced, more or less, in every revival where it is allowed free course. O, for such a divine afflatus upon all the Churches! Dodgeville and Peddler’s Creek were out appoint- ments, but not mentioned in the Minutes. According to the printed Minutes, Madison and Mus- coda formed one pastoral charge, with T. M. Fullerton and one to be supplied. But Mr. Fullerton assures the writer that this is a mistake; that ‘‘Jesse L. Bennett came from Missouri, and supplied Madison the latter part of this year and the next;” that his own appointment was Muscoda. This was a new circuit, and as the preacher had just been received on trial, it gave him a good oppor- tunity to prove his loyalty to the itinerancy, as the reader will see. He describes the extent of his circuit as includ- the other in 1836 or 1837), and though Dr. Brunson’s account we know to be incorrect in part, yet, in the absence of fur- ther information, the claim that a church edifice was erected there in 1834 would not be questioned. But there are counter representations: 1. Rev. G. J. Whitford, stationed there in 1840-1, declares there was no church there at his arrival; that the stone church (already spoken of) was built and dedicated during bis pas- torate, and that he never heard an allusion to a previous one. 2. Rev. John Crummer, Mr. Whitford’s immediate prede- cessor, and who had also been junior preacher there during a part of the Conference year 1836-7, bears the sume testimony. He says he preached in the log court-house, and describes its location as a little out of town, on a ridge or slight elevation. 3. Richard Haney, pastor there in 1836-7, who is said, in one of the above traditional accounts, to have dedicated the church, declares ‘there was no church there” when he went there as pastor; that he did not hear that there ever had been one; that he did not dedicate one while there; that he ‘“‘ preached in the log court-house.”’ 68 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. ing “all settlements both sides of Wisconsin River, from Muscoda to Baraboo, once in three weeks. Blue Mounds were on the east line, and all out-doors west.” This surely gave him sufficient travel for healthful exercise. He seems to have explored that new region thoroughly, preaching to small congregations, averaging about “eight each, through the year; once had only two, frequently five or six.” He was indeed a pioneer, preaching the first time in the following places—except, perhaps, one, where also he established regular appointments—viz.: Prairie du Sac, September 12th; the Bluffs, same date; Blue River (now Montfort), September 26th; Muscoda, September 27th; Baraboo, November 16th. On the 7th of November, 1841, he formed a class at Blue River, consisting of Eliza P. Meaker, leader; Moses Meaker, Alex. B'air, Sarah Blair, Lydia C. Blair, and Harriet Tyrer. On the 5th of February, 1842 (the same Conference year), he formed one at Baraboo, consisting of Solomon Shaffer, leader; Ole Shaffer, Parmelia Guilson, and Mary J. Hill. We see in this case, as in many, the real genius of our itinerancy. Instead of waiting for the people to settle, improve the country, and call a preacher, it sends him on, almost in advance of the people, to offer them the Bread of Life at their arrival. These settlements were sparse and small. That region now bristles with life and ac- tivity. It will be remembered that J. Crummer visited Sauk Prairie in 1839, preached and formed aclass. But as no preacher had found his way thither during this interim, it is probable that the class had ceased to exist. Janesville takes its place in our records this year, and will be found to occupy an increasingly prominent position. Alpha Warren, also a new man, was pastor. ‘The first gospel sermon preached there was in September, 1837, by ANNALS OF 1841. 69 Jesse Halstead, then on Aztalan Circuit. The services were held in a rude structure called a tavern, the preacher standing in the place where the fire-waters of death were accustomed to be dealt out (they being removed for the occasion), and there directed a small group of hearers to the fountain of life. Religious services were held there but a few times, and with no regularity, till 1840, when it was connected with Troy Circuit. The preacher, Jas. McKean visited the place about once in four weeks, and in the spring of 1841, it is said, he formed a class, every member of which left the place in course of a few months. In 1841 it was made the head of a circuit, and was in- cluded in Platteville District, of which H. W. Reed was in charge. It is difficult to determine its precise boundaries ; but it is reasonable to suppose that it embraced about all the settlements in Rock County, at least. A quarterly meeting was held by the presiding elder at Milton, some time in this year. Hamilton Grove is but another name for Helena Cir- cuit. It has also borne the name of Wiota. Each of these, therefore, indicated about the same territory, which has already been described. This grove took its name from a son of Alexander Hamilton, the wise statesman but foolish victim of Aaron Burr, in a duel that marred the fame of the former and blighted the political pros- pects of the latter. Mr. Hamilton was taken off by the gold-fever to California, where he died very poor. His former neighbors showed their high regard for him by erecting a monument to his memory. J. R. Goodrich, whose name does not appear in the list of active men since the failure of his health in Mil- waukee in 1837, is this year put in charge of Green Bay District, and also of the Church in that place, In view of his pastoral relations to the Church at Green Bay, but two other charges were included in his district—Oneida 70 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. and Brothertown Missions. The latter has so far been known as Deansburg, thus called for awhile by the Broth- ertown Indians, in honor of a Mr. Dean who had rendered them important service in their efforts to become citizens. About the same territory seems to be included in it this year that constituted Fond du Lac Circuit last year. It embraced all the region around the head of Winnebago Lake. Jesse Halstead was still in charge of the field. At some period during the previous year he visited the place where Oshkosh now stands, and preached in the house of Webster Stanley. This was the first Methodist sermon in that vicinity. Soon after the Conference of 1841 he again visited it and formed atclass, consisting of Ira Aiken and his mother, Mrs. Aiken; Rachael Aiken, his sister ; Mrs. Chester Ford, Miss Ann Brooks, and Mrs. Electa Wright. John T. Mitchell, who formed the first Methodist class in Platteville, and dedicated the first house of worship in Wisconsin among the white population, appears as pre- siding elder on Chicago District, which embraced seven appointments on our soil. He had been doing valiant service for eight years in Illinois. Meanwhile, the six members he enrolled in Platteville, in 1833, had increased throughout the territory to 1,491. Four new men appear in the list of appointments this year, viz.: Wm. Hewson, junior colleague of L. F. Moul- throp, at Troy; P. S. Richardson, junior colleague of D. Worthington, on the Burlington work; Silas Bolls, pastor at Milwaukee; and F. T. Mitchell, in charge of South- port. Prairieville (now Waukesha) first comes to view this year as a pastoral charge. H. W. Frink formed a class there in the Conference year 1839-40, consisting of Mr. Owen and wife, Richard Smart, Truman Wheeler and wife, Hiram Wheeler and wife, Theophilus Haylett (father of 4 ANNALS OF 1841. 71 Rev. H. P. Haylett, of our Conference), .and Horace Edsel]. The first named was leader. It thus became a stated preaching-place in Watertown Circuit. The next year it formed a part of Summit Circuit. A church edifice was erected in 1841. It has generally been sup- posed that Mr. Frink was the first Methodist preacher that visited Prairieville, if not, indeed, the first of any denom- ination. This is a mistake. Nathaniel Walton, recently deceased, was the first settler there. He arrived at Mil- waukee from Genesee County, New York, the latter part of March, 1836. The following summer he assisted in cutting a wagon-road through to the little prairie that aft- erwards gave name to the place. In October of the same year he commenced housekeeping in a rude cabin near the now famous ‘‘ Bethesda Spring.” Others soon came and settled near. An account of the commence- ment of religious services is here given in Mr. Walton’s own words: ‘‘ One devout Christian began immediately to observe regular hours of secret prayer, and on such occa- sions all the neighbors within half a mile could plainly hear his every word. The service for the first sermon preached was held in my house, the clergyman officiating being that good Methodist, Father Wheelock.” Of this pioneer the writer has been able to obtain but little in- formation, except that he was a local preacher in our Church, residing a few miles distant in an easterly direc- tion, quite advanced in life, a very earnest Christian, and highly esteemed for his work’s sake. Little is known of the history of Prairieville during this first year of its separate existence as a circuit, except that it was left to be supplied, and that 180 members were reported from it at the next Conference. Thus it seems to have been well supplied, and the report a proph- ecy of its future prominence. Milwaukee also seems to have been favored with a 72 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. ‘“‘vefreshing from the presence of the Lord,” as 164 mem- bers—an increase of about ninety per cent—were reported. Racine was supplied by some one unknown to the writer. For some reason its membership and that of Southport were reported together, and showed but a small aggregate increase. From the entire Conference were reported 2,327 mem- bers—an increase of about thirty-three and a third per cent. In the appointments of this year the name of John T. Mitchell appears for the last time. His next appointment was Chicago. He remained a member of the Illinois Con- ference till the formation of the Rock River Conference, which carried him with it, and in which he became dis- tinguished. He was one of the representatives of that body in the famous General Conference of 1844, by which he was elected assistant Agent of the Western Book Con- cern, at Cincinnati. He was subsequently transferred to the Cincinnati Conference, and filled some of her best ap- pointments. The writer last saw him at the General Con- ference of 1856. A few years after this he died, in the prime of manhood, having made a noble record, and leav- ing a name embalmed in the grateful recollection of thousands. David, Worthington had been connected with the Con- ference but two years. After this session he passed into Iowa, where he continued for several years a successful preacher, and became somewhat prominent among his brethren. He died many years since. ANNALS OF 1842. 73 CHAPTER VIII. 1842-3. HIS year eight pastoral charges on our soil are in- cluded in Chicago District, five in Rock River Dis- trict (a part of which was in Illinois), and fifteen in Platte- ville and Green Bay Districts. H. Crews was presiding elder on the first district named ; S. H. Stocking was in charge of Rock River District; B. T. Kavanaugh, of Platteville District; and J. R. Good- rich was continued in charge of Green Bay District. Mr. Stocking was a new man among us; Mr. Kava- naugh had been in the Upper Mississippi Indian work. One of the most noticeable features of the appointments this year is the large proportion of new men. The whole number appointed was thirty-three, of which fourteen had not been previously connected with our work. These were Milton Bourne, Jas. Mitchell, J. G. Whit- comb, N. Jewett, S. H. Stocking, Alfred M. Early, H. J. Brace, Washington Wilcox, S. Stover, G. L. S. Stuff, Michael Decker, C. G. Lathrop, R. J. Harvey, William Vance, and J. P. Gallup, the five last named having just been received on trial. Some of these soon disappeared from our view; others made long and honorable records, as will be seen in due time. This large force of new men is the more noticeable on ac- count of the comparatively small increase of new charges— only five; and some of these seem not to indicate entirely new territory. 6 74 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Sugar Creek was evidently formed, in part, from Mon- roe Circuit, though it may have taken on considerable new ground. Winnebago Lake included Fond du Lac, that had for- merly been a part of the Brothertown work, and also took some new territory on the west side of the lake that gave name to the circuit. Potosi was connected the year before with Lancaster. Wisconsin Pinery Mission was indeed a new work, and indicated, as has many other appointments, the care of our Church for those beyond ordinary gospel influences, and the facility of reaching them by our itinerant system. Sylvania is the name of a new circuit, and for thirty- nine years indicated the head of a pastoral charge, but has entirely disappeared from our Minutes. It seems to have been formed in part from portions of Southport or Racine Circuit, or both of the preceding year; for we now find the two latter united in one charge, with James Mitch- ell pastor. Milton Bourne, a new man in our territory, was the preacher on the circuit—Sylvania. He had been one of John Clark’s helpers in the Green Bay and Lake Superior Missions, and also for the last few years doing good work in Illinois. A prominent point in Sylvania Circuit has been known as Kellogg’s Corners since the spring of 1837, at which time three Kellogg brothers settled there. They formed a part of a large family, most of whom were influential and useful members of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Their Christian names were Chauncey, Seth H., and Thaddeus, and they seem to have been “‘ uncles” to everybody. Like their brothers, Leveret S., of Milwaukee, and Austin, of Kenosha, whose zeal and usefulness have already been re- corded, their religion survived a removal to the West. So, the first Sabbath after they became settled, they, their wives, father and mother—eight in all—members of the ANNALS OF 1842. 75 Methodist Episcopal Church, with ten children, met in one of the rude shanties just constructed, for a prayer-meeting. This being over, they formed a Sunday-school, of which Mrs. Seth H. Kellogg was appointed superintendent. This school, beginning with ten, has been running con- stantly since that day. At that time there was but one other family within ten miles, the place being equidis- tant from Racine and Kenosha. In the summer of 1860, Mrs. Kellogg, having previ- ously removed from the vicinity, returned to a Sunday-school festival, and saw three hundred children gathered from contiguous points, the wife of the superintendent being one of the original ten. Surely, our ‘labor is not in vain in the Lord.” These earnest workers soon commenced the erection of a house of worship. The people were few and poor, but with the aid of two hundred dollars, raised by a sister of the Kelloggs in the Sunday-schools of New York—whose husband, Rev. Julius Field, was one of the pastors in that city—and much gratuitous labor by Chauncey Kellogg as a carpenter, it was finished in 1840, and stands to this day, a monument of their Christian zeal and self-denying devo- tion. These brothers have all ‘‘rested from their labors.” It is a pleasure to contemplate the history of such men. We can scarcely estimate the world’s indebtedness to them. The report from Sylvania shows 174 members, and from Southport, including Racine, 279. Milwaukee was ‘“‘left to be supplied,” but not to be neg- lected. Wm. H. Sampson, so long and so favorably known among us, was transferred from the Michigan Conference and stationed there, arriving at his new field the last of August. The reader will be interested in a brief sketch of his work, as given by himself: ‘‘ He found among the leading male members of the Church on his arrival, L. S. Kel- 76 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. logg, Geo. F. Austin, J. L. Bean, Dr. Walker, J. L. Smith, A. Hounsome, Daniel Wait, Alex. T. Wilson, and Uriel Farmin.” . Mr. Austin is one of the few, if not the only survivor. He has labored long and well for the Church of his early choice, highly esteemed as a man of sterling probity, ‘‘an Israelite, indeed, in whom is no guile,” and now, weighted with years of toil, is awaiting the call to the rest of the faithful. Thank God for such men! Mr. Sampson continues: ‘Soon after my arrival I was in- formed there had been a committee appointed by one of the other Churches to visit all the public houses in the city, to escort all stranger's to their place of worship; and when inquired of where the Methodist Episcopal Church wor- shiped, they were not sufficiently acquainted with them to give any information. Strangers expressed their surprise to me that certain business men knew so little about our people and their place of worship, as ours was the only Protestant church-building in the city. I early formed the acquaintance of the other clergymen, and as soon as I thought it prudent proposed a weekly ministerial meeting for advancing the Redeemer’s kingdom. We met on Monday morning, and I proposed that we should report to each other the members of other communions we might chance to find in our pastoral visiting. This soon had the de- sired effect, and the Sunday morning committee became useless, as the necessity was upon us to be faithful in our reports, or submit to each other’s godly admonitions; for in these we were sure to be punctual when deserved. I found it necessary to visit much to defend the interests of our Church, and was often surprised and pained to find so many members in other Churches who, in the East, were converted in our Church and identified themselves with us, but after coming to Milwaukee, either from mis- representations or ambitious motives, had joined other Churches.” ANNALS OF 1842. 77 Mr. Sampson is not alone in the experience indicated in this extract. Many of our older ministers and mem- bers especially, can appreciate them. In instances—not a few—after the self-sacrificing ‘‘ circuit-rider ” had pioneered the country, and supplied the people with preaching for a year or two, living on almost nothing, a missionary direct from the East, just out of college or theological seminary, perhaps, would appear in the village or growing settle- ment, and propose that all interested in the growth of the place should unite in sustaining meetings every Sabbath. Meanwhile, as the place grew, and the circumstances of the people improved, the idea would be made prominent that ‘‘the best society is in the Church.” How many have been wheedled by these considera- tions—‘“‘ town improvement” and ‘‘ best society ”—we have no means of estimating. Beyond all question it has been considerable. But this would not be a matter of much re- gret if the word ‘‘ best” had been used to indicate the highest degree of moral worth. But, alas! it often meant the most fashionable, the most worldly, and so, of course, the least Christ-like. Nor has this argument become entirely obsolete. To this day it is plied occasionally and with much earnestness, ‘‘O, the Methodists are a good sort of people—a little cranky and superstitious—do n’t allow their young people any latitude.” Thus, those who are made to think that the ‘‘ best society ” is found at the “‘ social hop” or the ‘ progressive eucher party,” are drawn away. While such are lost to Methodism, they are also usually lost to the cause of righteousness, by being removed from the instructions that would lead them to better views of experimental and practical piety. From all that appears, a kind of work was done this year in Milwaukee that was demanded by the circum- stances, though there was a diminution of members. Jas. Ash was appointed to Root River Circuit, which 78 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. had enjoyed the labors of H. Whitehead for the two years of its existence. It included the towns of Lake, Greenfield, Franklin, New Berlin, Oak Creek, and Cale- donia. The Quarterly Conference records of this circuit are before me, from this date to 1860, when, after a hard struggle for life, it lost its identity by the irresistible influx of a foreign population. It may be interesting to the reader to see the financial exhibit of the circuit at the close of the year 1842. It is as follows: Whole sum received......cscceccecssssseseesceseeensueesees $70 48 AS QUALLCTAGE. ..-.---.ceeeeceeeeeeeereeeeeeeeereeeeeneee seees 46 93 Family expenses .........:.ccsesssereecessssesecaeeeeg teeees 23 50 Fortunately, Mr. Ash had only a wife to support. But $70.43 would not be deemed at this time a very enticing salary, and $23.50 would indicate rather short rations. The Minutes show S. P. Keyes as the preacher at Madison; but it seems that, his health failing, Jesse L. Bennett supplied the place. G. L. S. Stuff was nominally junior preacher at Oneida. The real design was to aid Rev. J. R. Goodrich, having charge not only of the Mission District as presiding elder, but also of Green Bay Church as pastor. So the labors of Mr. Stuff were divided between the Indian school at Oneida and the pastoral work at Green Bay, in the absence of Mr. Goodrich. The net gain of the year throughout the work was 1,278, the total number this year being 3,605. After this year, the names of Hooper Crews and S. P. Keyes no more appear in connection with Wisconsin. Mr. Crews had been two years on districts that extended into our territory. He now passed into Illinois, where he be- came eminent both in ability and usefulness. Few ever had a warmer place in the affections of all. At an ad- vanced age he passed, several years ago, from faithful la- ANNALS OF 1843, 79 bor to final rest. Mr. Keyes spent five years on our soil, and then went into the more southern part of the Con- ference. He became somewhat distinguished among his brethren. He still lives in a ripe old age, awaiting the Master’s call. N. Jewitt, H. J. Brace, and W. Vance, after one year among us, followed those just named to Illinois. 1843. The districts and their incumbents were the same this year as last, except Rock River, of which J. Sinclair was in charge. The Minutes show six new pastoral charges, viz.: Ge- neva, Whitewater, Hazel Green, Highland Prairie, Mani- towoc, and Sugar River. The first of these, however, probably indicates about the same territory as did Burling- ton of the previous year; and Sugar River is evidently substituted for Sugar Creek. Really, therefore, only four can be called new appointments. Eleven new men are found on our soil, though this does not indicate that so many were added to the force of the preceding year. As the Conference was not formed with regard to State or Territorial lines, the preachers were sent from Illinois to Wisconsin, and vice versa, as now from one county to another. There did not seem to be a lack of preachers, as only two places were left to be supplied. These were Sylvania and Janesville. Special notice has been given to the for- mer. The latter long ago became a very prominent ap- pointment in our Conference, and for several years has contained two important pastoral charges. W. H. Sampson was removed from Milwaukee to Southport, and Jas. Mitchell from the latter place to the former—each the other’s predecessor and successor. The church edifice at Southport was built and owned 80 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. by a stock company. It was not, therefore, a Methodist church, though our people were allowed to occupy it. Mr. Mitchell had secured a relinquishment of the claims of nearly all the stockholders; but on account of dissatisfac- tion with him, he could do no more in that line. Mr. Sampson’s manly bearing and conciliatory manner were just adapted to the emergency. He went directly from the seat of the Conference—Dubuque—to Southport, obtained the requisite signatures of the other parties, and had the deed properly executed and recorded before he reached his family in Milwaukee. Harmony being restored, a house of worship owned by the worshipers, and general satisfaction with the preacher, a pleasant, prosperous year naturally followed. At Milwaukee the most important event of the year seems to have been the commencement of a new church edifice. The growing congregation demanded it, and the future prospects of the town seemed to warrant a consid- erable outlay for this purpose. As is often the case, es- pecially in towns divided by a river, there was some diffi- culty in deciding upon a location. Indeed, in this case, considerable strife was engendered, and, unfortunately, the pastor had more skill in fostering than in allaying that element. The site finally selected was the corner of Spring (now Grand Avenue) and West Water Streets, where a plain but substantial brick building was erected, forty-five by ninety feet. The auditorium was on the second floor, easily accessible by a well-constructed flight of steps on the outside. On the ground-floor were four stores. It was by far the largest and best Methodist church edifice in our territory. A pretty large debt was incurred in its erection, which would have been fatal perhaps, but for the rent of the stores. This debt was not canceled till 1854, when the building was burned. Of this, more will be said in due time. ANNALS OF 1843, 81 Racine appears again this year as a separate charge, with Milton Bourne as pastor. The new men referred to on a previous page were N. Swift, junior colleague of H. Whitehead, on Troy Circuit; J. M. Snow, at Geneva; S. Jones, at Aztalan; R. Delap and J. Lewis, on Sugar River Circuit; Jesse L. Bennett, on Madison Mission; and I. M. Leihy, junior colleague of Jesse Halstead, on Hazel Green Circuit. In after years the last named took a prominent position among us, as will appear in due time. Prairieville (Waukesha) this year received two preachers— L. F. Moulthrop and S. Stover. Its dimensions were probabably not increased, except as they might be able to push their work into the ‘regions beyond.” Its exact boundaries are not known, but it evidently included most of the settlements in Waukesha County, some in Milwaukee, and all in Washington. It was in Chicago District, and Presiding Elder Crews—that noble man of God—assisted the preachers in the most extensive revival of religion, probably, that had been known in that part of the Terri- tory. Whitewater appears as a new circuit, with Alpha War- ren as pastor. Jt was in Rock River District. At some time in the Conference year of 1837-8 an appointment was established in this place by those indefatigable workers, S. Pillsbury and J. Halstead, of whom it may almost be said they ‘‘ went everywhere, preaching the Word.” The first sermon is said to have been preached in a tavern; but just where, or by which of these veterans, is not known. Alpha Warren was the first preacher appointed to the charge under this name, as he was also the first appointee to Janesville Circuit. G. L. 8. Stuff, who, the preceding year, divided his labors between the Indian School at Oneida and the pas- 7 82 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. toral work at Green Bay, was this year put in charge of the latter place. H. R. Colman continued to do good work at Oneida. Manitowoc makes its first appearance this year in our Minutes, with David Lewis as pastor. Mr. Lewis had been one year on trial in the Conference, junior colleague of Rufus Lumery, on Indian Creek Circuit, in Illinois. To reach his appointment involved about two hundred and fifty miles’ travel on horseback. In those days there were no railroads, no easy carriages here. Methodist preachers were the ‘‘ Lord’s cavalry.” The first of this young itiner- ant’s journey was over broad prairies and through pleasant groves, with sufficient inhabitants to render travel some- what comfortable. The latter part was through dense and even dismal forests. Especially from Milwaukee to She- boygan, it presented a kind of romance that few would covet. He had traveled in company with H. 8. Brunson, just appointed to Winnebago Lake Mission, from Dubuque, the seat of the Conference, to Milwaukee. Reaching ‘‘ Kil- burn Hill,” towards the northern limit of our present me- tropolis, they separated, one taking the ‘‘ Fond du Lac road,” the other the ‘‘Green Bay road,” each plunging into a dense wilderness. Soon an opportunity arose for the young minister to exhibit the spirit of the gospel he had recently begun to preach. He found a young man seated on a log in sadness, bordering despair. He had just landed from a boat, had been terribly sea-sick, and was suffering from its effects; had lost his movey, and had started for some northern point in that dreary land. Mr. Lewis encouraged him to go on, and kindly offered him the use of his horse a part of the time. Thus they proceeded in company the rest of the way, walking and riding alternately. At Saukville, twenty-two miles from Milwaukee, night overtook them, and they stopped at the ANNALS OF 1843, 83 only house there—a sort of tavern. All seemed agreeable to the proprietor till, by some means, he learned that Mr. Lewis was a Methodist preacher. He then began to rave, and would have turned him out, but the night was so dark and the road so obscure that he knew it was im- possible for him to reach another place of entertainment. The next morning the good Samaritan settled the bill of his new friend, as well as his own; but he could do so only by leaving some of his books in pawn for a part of it. Then he started for his destination—distant about thirty miles, twenty of which were without a human hab- itation. He reached Sheboygan Falls the same day, and found a hearty welcome in the house of Mr. James Gibbs, whose wife was a Methodist. This place was a part of his charge, and the following Sabbath he entered upon his work there, preaching in the morning at what is Sheboygan City, and in the evening at the Falls. His circuit was immense in extent, including all the settlements from Green Bay to Milwaukee; and these settlements were often remote from each other—in some instances, five to twenty miles would intervene between houses. The people were about as rough and uncultivated as the country. Speaking of them he says: “The inhabitants were mostly lJumbermen and sailors, and whisky was almost universal king.” Nor is this marvel- ous, for probably no minister of the gospel had traversed that region for five years. It will be remembered that an earlier pioneer, Rev. H. W. Frink, was sent there in 1837, the name of the circuit being Sheboygan. The financial crash so checked immi- gration, and so impoverished the country, that this vast wilderness had been neglected from the autumn of 1838 to that of 1843. Not far from October 1, 18438, Mr. Lewis preached at Manitowoc, and formed a class of eleven members. Those 84 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. formed by Mr. Frink, if any, along the lake-shore, had become scattered by time. This was a year of severe toil and trial. Few could have endured so well, and perhaps fewer still would have had the moral heroism it required. He received from the people for his year’s toil twenty-five dollars, and from the Missionary Society fifty dollars. But if the preacher had hard fare, so did the people. Some of them, he tells us, boiled wheat for food, as they were unable to get grinding done without going to Milwaukee. This year H. W. Frink served Brothertown, which was one of his appuintments in his great circuit in 1837. Samuel Spates and J. Johnson were appointed to the mission at the head of Lake Superior, called Fond du Lac, but this did not continue long in our Minutes. Highland Prairie made its first and last appearance this year in the Conference appointments. It was ina northwesterly direction from Watertown. In the western part of the work no very marked changes occurred. Muscoda and Wisconsin Pinery were dropped out of the list of appointments, and Hazel Green was added, which remained for many years as the name of a pastoral charge. The total increase of members this year was 600, the number reported this year being 4,205. Rev. DAVID LEWIS. Rev. ELIHU SPRINGER. Rev. W G. MILLER, D. D. Rev. C. HOBART, D. D. ANNALS OF 1844. 85 CHAPTER UX, 1844-5. HE Conference was this year held in Milwaukee, com- mencing July 24th. As stated on a preceding page, in 1837 Milwaukee gave name to a district which included all our work in the eastern part ot the State—seven pastoral charges. The mineral region, in which were four circuits, was embraced in Galena District. For four years Milwaukee continued the head of a district, and then was superseded by Chi- cago. This name also continued for three years. Mean- while the work had so expanded that the number of charges within the territory covered by Milwaukee District in 1837 had more than tripled. In the mineral region the circuits had just doubled. This year (1844) Milwaukee District again appears, with James Mitchell, presiding elder. Wm. H. Sampson is placed in charge of Green Bay * District. B. T. Kavanaugh remains on Platteville District, and S. H. Stocking, after a year’s absence, returns to Rock River District, which has five circuits in Wisconsin. Very little change is seen from the previous year in Platteville District in the circuits—really none of note, except that St. Croix was dropped and Blue River added. The former was on the Upper Mississippi, and had been more or less connected with the Indian work there, which at that time was disappearing or moving farther northward. 86 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Blue River had probably been a part of Hamilton Grove Circuit, and this year becomes the head of a pas- toral charge. It is now called Montfort, a growing town in Iowa County, and an appointment of considerable im- portance in the West Wisconsin Conference. The circuit extended to Wisconsin River. John Penman, just received on trial, was the pastor. Though there were so few changes in the appointments, there were many in the appointees, C. G. Lathrop and I. M. Leihy only remaining on their former charges; the former—alone on Lancaster Circuit the year before—received as junior colleague Wm. Allen; and the latter, junior preacher the previous year on Hazel Green Circuit, was placed in charge of it, with P. S. Rich- ardson as colleague. Salmon Stebbins was appointed to Madison. This place, then the capital of the Territory and now of the State, had been in the list of appointments for seven years, sup- ‘plied a part of the time by local preachers as they could be obtained; and when a preacher was appointed from Con- ference it shared only a small part of his labors, which were extended over a large area. Perhaps this was the best that the circumstances would allow; but to us, at this distance, it seems that more concentrated labor should have been bestowed upon a point of such prospective importance. In 1837 it appeared first a separate charge, and was in Mil- waukee District, presided over by Mr. Stebbins. As already stated, he visited the place and preached the first gospel ser- mon there November 28th. Green Bay District underwent a considerable change; Fond du Lac, at the head of Lake Superior, disappeared from the Minutes, and Fond du Lac, at the head of Lake Winnebago, came to view in connection with Taycheedah, as a pastoral charge. Watertown and Pewaukee also were included in the dis- trict. The district, though not so extensive as in some ANNALS OF 1844. 87 previous years, was yet immense in territory. It extended from Green Bay and Oneida on the north to Pewaukee on the south, and from Lake Michigan west to the Wisconsin River. The paucity of the inhabitants and the wildness of the country made it a very hard field of labor. Presid- ing Elder Sampson made Fond du Lac his residence, and his was the fifth family in the place. Oneida and Brothertown Indian Missions were the only charges that retained their former pastors. But H. W. Frink, appointed to the latter, vacated it after a few months, to settle the estate of his father-in-law, and W. G. Miller, then an ‘‘ exhorter,” was employed to fill out the year. Fond du Lac and Taycheedah seem io indicate the field of Joseph Lewis, but, like many of the preachers of that day, he extended his labors to ‘‘ regions beyond.” To the eastward he penetrated the wilderness far towards Sheboy- gan, to the southward as far as Waupun. Winnebago Lake, that had for two years included Fond du Lac, was extended this year farther west and north. Mr. Webster Stanley, Geo. and Wm. Wright, with their families, constituted the inhabitants on the north side of Fox River, where Oshkosh now stands. A few miles out, southward and northward, were perhaps a half dozen other families. Wm. Wright and his wife became members of the Church, and continued so, as well as residents of the ‘city, for several years, and many an itinerant shared the hospitality of their house. Mr. Stanley afterwards removed up the Wolf River to a place now known as Stanley’s Landing ; thence, after several years, to Appleton, where he resided for several years, when he removed to Dakota, where he died in December, 1887, always respected by those who knew him. To this circuit J. H. Hurlburt was appointed, and the reader will think, from its sparse population, that it was not a very inviting field. 88 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Pewaukee was a new circuit, covering five townships ; viz., Pewaukee, Menominee, Lisbon, Warren, and Dela- field. To this, David Lewis was assigned. He seems to have had a successful year, as here he found a wife (who still lives to cheer him in his pilgrimage), and reported 65 members. F. A. Savage was appointed to Milwaukee, Robert Beatty to Root River, and C. D. Cahoon to Southport— all new men. The first two had just been received on trial by the Conference; the last was transferred from New Hampshire Conference. The next year he was appointed to Rockford, where, after preaching one Sabbath, he was called to his reward. He is mentioned with great tender- ness, by those who knew him, asa very devout man, an excellent and successful preacher. The other two passed from our territory after this year. Washington Mission was a new work, formed in part from Prairieville Circuit, but extending far north into new territory, including all the settlements in Washington County. It was in charge of J. M. Snow. L. F. Moulthrop remained on Prairieville Circuit with- out an assistant. Monroe and Sugar River Circuits, in Rock River Dis- trict, both received new men—the former, Charles McClure; the latter, S. W. Martin. Some time during the winter of 1843-4 a church edi- fice was commenced by our people in Racine, and completed not far from the following Christmas. It cost about $4,500, and would seat three hundred and fifty persons. The names of James Mitchell and G. L. S. Stuff disap- peared from our records after this year. The former occupied a conspicuous position, and was evidently a man of much ability; but he was quite as distinguished for promoting party strife as for his usefulness. The latter began a good record with us, and continued it in the Rock River Con- ANNALS OF 1845. 89 ference for many years; he recently passed to his reward in a ripe age, and will be long remembered as a faithful and able minister of the gospel. For six years, between 1837 and 1844 inclusive, Sal- mon Stebbins held a prominent ,position in Wisconsin, two of which he was in charge of Milwaukee District. He was a transfer from Troy Conference, and after 1844 he passed into the more southern part of Rock River Confer- ence. He died several years ago at an advanced age. B. T. Kavanaugh and Silas Bowls both appear on our soil in 1841, and pass off in 1845. The former located in 1846 ; the latter continued for many years a zealous laborer in connection with the Rock River and Minnesota Confer- ence. H.S. Brunson gave us but two years’ work. 1845. No less than eighteen new men appear this year on our soil. The reader is referred to Appendix A for their names. Some of them became quite distinquished in our annals—not the least of whom was Henry Summers, in charge of Platteville District. Already a veteran, he did grand service for many years thereafter. Elibu Springer was another new man among us, though in the itinerancy since 1834. He was stationed at Min- eral Point ; he held an honorable position, as will be seen, for a few years, and then passed on to his reward. Several new charges’ appear in the Minutes for this year, though they do not so much indicate new territory as a demand for increased labor on territory already acquired. One of these was Dodgeville. It had been included in other circuits for some years. J. G. Whitford was pastor. Sauk Prairie, the name of another new pastoral charge, does not indicate entirely new territory. It was visited first by J. Crummer in 1839, and in 1841 was taken under pas- toral care, and continued as a part of other circuits till 90 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. this year. The same is substantially true of Union, Green Lake, Lowell, Whitewater, and Elkhorn, so far as their relation to other circuits is concerned. The territory embraced in Union Circuit was included in Monroe in 1840 and 1841, in Madison in 1842, in Janes- ville in 1843 and 1844. After the last date it was the head of a circuit for several years. Asa Wood was in charge of it for two years from its formation. We find two preachers this year on Madison Mission, but do not learn that much more labor was bestowed on the village than formerly. = W. H. Sampson was continued in charge of Green Bay District. Though it contained but twelve pastoral charges, it covered an immense area, and the roads in many parts of it were horrible, rendering it a very laborious field. The Minutes show that every circuit was furnished with a pastor from the Conference. H. R. Colman, who had labored at Oneida successfully for four years, was succeeded by C. G. Lathrop. The vast. wilderness included in Monitowoc Mission of the previous year, now appears in two missions—Monitowoc, with S. W. Martin in charge; and Sheboygan, with Joseph Lewis. The following incident will illustrate somewhat. both the character of the work in those days and the manner of doing it: General Blake, an old-time friend of the writer in the State of New York, having recently come to the country, was making his way on horseback as best he could through the dense forest south of Sheboygan, when he met a small man on foot, and accosted him thus: ‘‘ What in the world are you doing in such a place as this?” ‘‘ Hunt- ing up souls,” was the significant reply. The general was forcibly impressed with his simplicity of manner and ear- nest zeal. A little further conversation revealed the fact that he was a Methodist preacher. Each went on his way, ANNALS OF 1845, 91 but the words ‘‘ hunting up souls” continued to ring in the general's ears. He was hunting land. The minister was in search of what was of more value than all worlds. When the general related this to the writer years after- wards, he had forgotten the name of the preacher, but. not the incident. A little inquiry showed that the soul-hunter was Joseph Lewis. In spite of great opposing influences, he had a prosperous year. Three other honored names appear in the list of ap- pointments this year for the first time, viz.: S. W. Ford, to Hamilton Grove; W. G. Miller, to Green Lake; and J. M. Walker, to Elkhorn. It is noticeable that all ap- pointments in Green Bay District, except Aztalan and Whitewater, were missions; and perhaps quite as much so, that the former was a mission the year before with but one preacher, and this year is self-supporting with two—C. N. Wager and S. B. Whipple. H. 8. Stocking was removed from Rock River District, a part of which, as constructed the previous year was in Wisconsin, to Milwaukee District. All our work this year was included in the three dis- tricts named. Milwaukee was left to be supplied. Abraham Hanson, a young man of good ability and winning manners, was secured for the place. He did a successful year’s work, and left many warm friends—no enemies. He will come to view again in due time. David Lewis was appointed to Root River Circuit, which covered seven townships; viz., Oak Creek, Lake, Greenfield, Franklin, New Berlin, Raymond, and Norway. Racine was served by Julius Field. Mr. Field com- menced his ministry in the New York Conference, and was transferred to Illinois Conference in 1839. He served two years on Milwaukee District, four years as Bible agent, and at the close of one year’s pastorate at Racine returned 92 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. to his old Conference, where he continued to render effect- ive service for several years longer, and died well, in the midst of his earlier associations. Mrs. Field was a sister of the Kelloggs, several of whom were distinguished and use- ful laymen in the early history of our work in Wisconsin. Menominee Mission of this year is substantially the same as Washington Mission of last year, J. M. Snow continuing in charge. Washington Wilcox became identified this year with Wisconsin Methodism, and continued so to the close of a long and useful life. He was in charge of Sylvania Circuit. The reader will learn more of him hereafter. It is difficult to give the boundaries of some of these circuits—indeed, some of them seem to have had none. Said Presiding Elder Sampson to W. G. Miller, in answer to an inquiry as to the boundaries of Green Lake Circuit, to which he had just been appointed: ‘‘ Fix a point in the center of Winnebago Marsh [now known as Lake Horicon ], and draw a line to the north pole, and another due west to the Rocky Mountains, and you will have your eastern and southern boundaries; as to the other lines you need not be particular.” This was about as good a description as he could give in few words. The young itinerant started out to explore his field, and make conquests for his Master. His labors extended to Ceresco (where now stands the beautiful city of Ripon), Dartford, Kingston, Waupun, Marcellon, Fox Lake, Bur- net, Alto, Oakfield, Cambria, and Wedge’s Prairie, near Brandon, forming classes in nearly every place. Waupun, also in his work, already had an organized society, of which the preacher was a member when called out into the itiner- ant work. He desired to establish an appointment at Strong’s Landing (now the City of Berlin), but on reach- ing the place found not a human habitation. Thus the “itinerancy was ahead of the pioneer.” ANNALS OF 1845, 93 Early in the Conference year the demand for preaching at new points was so general that another preacher, Uriel Farmin, was put into this field as the pastor’s colleague. They worked together in great harmony and with mutual esteem for each other. But though very successful in win- ning souls, the preacher in charge received only thirty-six dollars and board; and he thinks Mr. Farmin did not re- ceive more. They left the circuit with twenty-four appoint- ments and 184 members, most of whom were gathered in that year. Lowell included also Fountain Prairie, Columbus, and the country far south. Monitowoc Circuit meant at least the entire county. Its few inhabitants were a rough class of people. The fol- lowing incident, furnished by Rev. W. H. Sampson, will confirm this, and in part explain the reason for abandon- ing the field as it was for a time after this year. After referring to the great difficulty in getting a house to live in, he says: ‘‘ Brother Martin was earnest in defense of the truth. There was a great amount of intemperance on his work, and he favored the community with a course of tem- perance lectures, and announced that the closing one would be King Alcohol’s funeral sermon. There wasa general gath- ering of everybody in the country around. At the close of the opening exercises, as he arose to take his text, the door opened, and about a dozen men, dressed in the most fantastic costume conceivable, presented themselves. He very composedly requested the audience to make room for the mourners, and after having them seated he proceeded with the sermon, and at the close addressed the mourners very pathetically and appropriately. Mr. Bruce, who gave me the account of the affair, was shocked and dis- gusted with the chaps, and, although not religious, went after the fellows, and made them furnish Martin with a full suit of broad-cloth—coat, pants, vest, hat, shoes, socks, 94 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. gloves, etc., and he came to Conference as well dressed as the best.” This incident suggests two thoughts: 1. Methodist preachers in the past, as now, were fearless in denouncing intemperance, even amid the rage of its infuriated victims. 2. It is always safe to stand erect on Christian principle, and it often “‘ pays” better, so far as this world is con- cerned. This year is distinguished as the first from which there was a reported decrease in numbers. There was a falling off of 52 members, but an increase of six preachers. When we remember that through the labors of this heroic band 600 were added to the host of Immanuel the previ- ous year, this reaction is not a matter of astonishment. ANNALS OF 1846. 1) CHAPTER X. 1846-7, HE work in Wisconsin continues this year as last, in three districts—Platteville, Green Bay, and Milwau- kee—presided over respectively by the same men, viz.: H. Summers, W. H. Sampson, and 8. H. Stocking. A. Wolis- craft performed his first and last year’s work among us as pastor at Platteville. Lancaster and Potosi were this year united in one pas- toral charge, to which John Crummer was appointed. He had explored this territory in 1836 and 1837, while on Platteville Circuit. The reader may recall his adven- ture with a drunken rabble, on his way to an appointment in Snake Hollow (now Potosi), and the triumph of grace that attended his work there. J. Penman completed the full constitutional term of ministerial service at Prairie du: Chien. St. Croix first appeared in our Minutes as an appoint- ment in the Indian Mission District in 1841, and thus continued until 1843, when it was included in the work among the general population, but disappeared thereafter for two years. It now resumes its place, with J. W. Putnam as pastor. Though St. Croix was in Wisconsin, he extended his labors into Minnesvta, and formed one or more classes. During his second year a lot was donated for a church edifice on the present site of St. Paul. Madison Mission still had two preachers—F. Smith and R. R. Farnsworth. Its boundaries fur this year can 96 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. not be given here, but they must have been considerably curtailed by the formation of new circuits from its original territory. Asa Wood is still at Union, on his second year. At some time during the Conference year 1842-3, S. P. Keyes, then in charge of Madison Circuit, which embraced what had now become Union Circuit, secured the erection of a house on the present site of Evansville, designed both for a school and a place of worship. The society continued to occupy it for the latter purpose till the sum- mer of 1847, when, under the labors of Mr. Wood, it gave place to a neat frame church edifice, forty-five by thirty feet. It was dedicated in June of that year by H. Summers, the presiding elder of the district. No special circumstances are known in connection with Monroe, Hamilton Grove, or Dodgeville. Each had a change of pastoral oversight. To the latter, as junior preacher, was appointed Benj. Close, just received on trial by the Conference. I. M. Leihy, who had been absent a year from ‘our soil, is this year in charge of Mineral Point, and his predecessor there, Elihu Springer, is removed to Hazel Green. The pastoral charges in Green Bay District—twelve in number—remain the same as last year, with a single ex- ception ; viz., Manitowoc is dropped and Waupun is added. Five new men are in the list of appointments in this district, viz.: R. P. Lawton, at Green Bay; J. S. Pres- cott, at Sheboygan; A. B. Randall, at Green Lake; A. P. Allen, at Waupun; and N.S. Green, at Aztalan. They had all just been received as probationers by the Conference, and, so far as appears, all did the work as- ssigned them creditably. All the charges were missions except Watertown, Aztalan, and Whitewater. Three of the appointments were filled with two preachers each, viz.: ANNALS OF 1846, 97 Green Lake, with A. B. Randall and G. N. Hanson; Lowell, with 8. Jones and 8. W. Martin; and Whitewater, with J. H. Hurlburt and A. Warren. Some of the others covered territory enough to employ more ministerial labor, but neither men nor means were adequate to the demand. Sheboygan is worthy of special notice in this respect. It included the entire county—a dense forest, dotted here and there with settlements. Its pastor, J. S. Prescott, was a man of great energy and commensurate physical endur- ance, as the reader may infer when told that he traveled that immense circuit entirely on foot. This gave an earnest that he would be heard from in coming years—as he was. Though there was no change in the incumbent of Mr1- WAUKEE Disrrict, every pastoral charge in it was fur- nished with one or more new preachers except Root River. Here David Lewis remained, and finished his two years of successful toil, J. P. Gallup also remained on Troy Circuit, where he seems to have been alone the previous year, and now re- ceives as a colleague M. L. Reed, a new man on our soil, as well as on this circuit. Six other new men appear in our territory, viz.: W. M. D. Ryan, at Milwaukee; John Chandler, at South- port; J. C. Parks and Geo. Lovesee, on Geneva Circuit ; J. Bean, on Big Foot; and J. Leekenby, on Menominee Mission. Mr. Ryan was a remarkable man—remarkable in sev- eral ways. He was remarkable for his histrionic talent; for his power to sway an audience; for his unbounded self-as- surance and self-assertion; for the way he could use these last two traits to draw so many and disgust so few; in short, for his ability to do an immense amount of business on small capital, aside from the qualities above named. At the close of this year he was transferred to Baltimore Conference, whence he came a few years before, and where 8 98 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. he passed most of his ministerial life. With many eccen- tricities, he was always successful in sustaining himself, and usually in advancing the work committed to his care. John Chandler, in charge of Southport, passed after this year into another part of the work, and has made an hon- orable record in the Rock River Conference. Delavan makes its first appearance this year in our Min- utes; not, however, as an independent pastoral charge, but in connection with Elkhorn; and yet but one preacher— G. W. Cotrell—is appointed to the circuit. Mequon also was set off this year as a separate charge, with that immense worker, Jesse Halstead, as pastor. Last year it formed a part of Menominee Mission, and yet that circuit demanded the labors of two men. J. Lecenby was the Conference appointee, and one was to be sup- plied. Beloit, with Joseph Lewis pastor, takes its place this year in the list, and has remained one of our permanent and important appointments. It is impossible to give the date of the first Methodist sermon, or the first sermon preached by any one at this place. The following extract of a letter from Thos. McElhenny gives several impor- tant facts in a small space: ‘‘I left Milwaukee, September 28th, and arrived at Beloit, October 1, 1838, but found no Church organization of any kind. Rev. Mr. Adams, a Presbyterian or Congregational minister, living at Rock- ton, and Albert Fuller, a local preacher, living at Ros- coe, preached occasionally. Geo. Lovesee, Sr., who had been licensed by Adam Clarke, the Commentator, would give us a talk sometimes; he also lived at Roscoe. I attended a quarterly meeting at Roscoe, and the presid- ing elder, Rev. John Clark, said we should have preaching regularly. Rev. Nathan Jewett preached the first regular circuit sermon on December 2, 1838, in the evening, in Caleb Blodgett’s kitchen. That was the regular preaching- ANNALS OF 1846, 99 place until the school-house was built. The first class was formed on Thursday evening, December 27, 1838, in Tyler Blodgett’s shanty, on Broad Street, east of the Presby- terian Church. It consisted of five members, viz.: Horace Barkley (leader), Mrs. Holland Moore (the mother of Pres- dent W. B. Strong, of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fee Railroad), and her sister, Miss Lucena Cheney (now Mrs. Dearborn), Tyler K. Blodgett, and Thos. McEl- henny.” It was taken into Sycamore Circuit, of which Rev. L. S. Walker was in charge, and by whom Rey. A. D. Field, in his ‘‘memorials,” says the society was formed. But Mr. McElhenny says it was formed by ‘ Father Lovesee,” though he says Jewett and Walker alternated in serving the place—the former being stationed at Rockford ; whence it is evident that, by some understanding between Walker and Lovesee, the latter officiated in forming the “class. This organization was the first of a religious char- acter in Beloit, antedating the Congregational Church just three days. In this first year of Beloit as a separate pastoral charge, the society commenced the erection of a church edifice. The members were few and poor, but they pushed the en- terprise with yigor and much real sacrifice. Stephen Adams, a local preacher, ‘‘ sold his last cow to buy lime that the walls might go up.” All did nobly. At the close of this year one of our most energetic and succesful pioneers—John Crummer—retired from the active field, and counted one in a list of twenty superannuates. He had been in connection with the Conference since 1836, and had done grand service for the Master. Four also re- tired by location, viz.: J. Hurlburt, Alpha Warren, J. B. Gallup, and G. W. Cotrell. The first two had rendered each seven years’ service; the third, five; the last, two. The year was one of considerable success, as appears from a reported increase of 767. 100 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. 1847. The work had so expanded that a new district was this year added in Wisconsin—four in all. H. Summers continued on Platteville, and Wm. H. Sampson on substantially the same ground as before, the name being changed to Fond du Lac District. Elihu Springer succeeded 8. H. Stocking on Milwaukee District; and Chauncey Hobart, a new man among us, was placed in charge of the newly formed Racine District. Twenty new men appear in the list, some of whom be- came distinguished, but none reached the eminence of the last one named. He commenced his itinerant ministry in 1836 in Illinois Conference, and had become distinguished as a safe administrator and able defender of Christianity. In Quincy he successfully exposed the abominations o Mormonism, which was making inroads there. While he was attentive to all the interests of the Church, he was also adapted to special occasions. He was therefore selected in 1845, at Jacksonville, to address a large meeting of citi- zens in commemoration of Ex-President Jackson, recently deceased; and at Chicago, in 1847, to preach to an im- mense gathering in connection with a ‘‘ National River and Harbor Convention.” Some changes in the pastoral charges may be briefly noted. Lancaster and Potosi, in the Platteville District, re- ceived two preachers instead of one as last year. These were F. Smith and Jesse Pardun. Franklin was the name of a new circuit, taken prob- ably from adjoining ones. A new mission was established among the Welsh, but left to be supplied, and little is known of its success this year. ANNALS OF 1847. 101 I. M. Leihy completed his full two years’ term at Mineral Point, and left the charge in a prosperous condition. Black River is the name of another new work, and in- troduces us to a wild region and rough inhabitants. In the winter of 1848 there was a consultation among some of the lumbermen along the river as to obtaining a preacher. They appointed a committee to circulate a sub- scription and find the preacher. Each subscriber was to designate his choice as to the religious denomination to which the preacher should belong, and a very large major- ity were found to be in favor of securing a Methodist. Probably religious conviction had little to do in the mat- ter, as the chairman is said to have been a skeptic, and the others perhaps scarcely knew what they were in this re- spect. Besides, the reason they assigned for their choice _was that they thought there ‘‘ was more go-aheadativeness about Methodist preachers than any others.” A petition was accordingly sent to Rev. H. Summers, presiding elder on Platteville District, and at the following Conference the mission was formed, and R. R. Wood ap- pointed thereto. This was the entrance to a field now swarming with inhabitants and bristling with church-spires. As already stated Green Bay District takes the name of Fond du Lac this year. Watertown and Aztalan were transferred to Milwaukee District, and Whitewater to the newly formed Racine District. Two new circuits were added ; viz., Columbus and May- ville. Nearly all the preachers were changed. This was no uncommon thing in those days. J.S. Prescott, at Sheboy- gan, and Stephen Jones, at Lowell, were the only ones that remained the second year. The former was re-enforceed with 8. R. Thorp as a colleague. The appointment at Mayville proved an unfortunate one. The others seemed to be attended with considerable success. 102 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. Presiding Elder Sampson says that H. R. Colman “did good service” at Fond du Lac; that though the work was laborious on Green Lake Circuit, C. G. Lathrop “had a good year” there; and, in short, he bears a good testimony for his fellow-workers generally. At Brothertown, H. Requa succeeded in the erection of a framed church edifice, in place of a log building previously used as a place of public worship. This and those at Green Bay and Oneida were the only ones in the entire district at the close of this year. Nor were there many of any other denomination. The Presbyterians had one at Green Bay, and one at Stockbridge, the Episcopalians one at Green Bay and another at Oneida Mission. The Congre- gationalists built one about this time at Whitewater that had, previous to this year, been within Elder Sampson’s district. The era of church-building bad not arrived. The people were poor, and could only with difficulty build houses for themselves. Mr. Sampson’s work during his term of four years was a success in more ways than one. In the spring of 1846 he received a letter from H. Eugene Eastman, of Green Bay, informing him that a gentleman in the East, of whom he was the authorized agent, proposed to give ten thou- sand dollars, on certain conditions, for the founding of a literary institution of high grade, and proffering the op- portunity to the Methodist Church as the one most likely, in his judgment, to make the enterprise a success. The conditions were that a like sum should be raised by other parties, and that the school should be located at some point between the outlet of Lake Winnebago and the head of Green Bay. Mr. Sampson presented the proposition to the Conference at its next session. It was favorably received, and he was requested to reduce the matter to definite and legal form. The gentleman making the offer proved to be Hon. A. A. Lawrence, of Boston. In due ANNALS OF 1847, 103 time the conditions were met, and the institution was called Lawrence Institute, being located in a dense forest where now stands the beautiful city of Appleton. Milwaukee District was put in charge of Elihu Springer, as already stated, and important changes made in its boundaries. Nine circuits were taken from it to help form Racine District, to compensate for which, Madison and Sauk Prairie (changed in name this year to Prairie du Sauk) were taken from Platteville District, and Water- town and Aztalan from Fond du Lac District. Prairieville Circuit had enjoyed an extensive revival the preceding year, under the labors of W. Wilcox and J. M. Walker. They reported an increase of 128 mem- bers—about forty per cent. The work having become so extensive, it was divided, at the Conference of 1847, into three pastoral charges; viz., Waukesha, Oconomowoc, and Palmyra. Mequon was changed in name to Grafton, embracing about the same territory as before Milwaukee was supplied by another transfer—F. M. Mills, from Baltimore Conference. He had a well-bal- anced and well-stored mind; his sermons were thoroughly evangelical, and very instructive; he was cautious, safe, and commanded general respect. But his physical energies were feeble, and his manner a striking contrast to that of his predecessor, so that he stood at disadvantage with those who especially admired the rush and storm of the former. Those of his style may not bring as many souls to God as some others, but may edify the Church in righteousness quite as extensively, or more so. At the close of this year he was compelled to retire from the active work, and, after a time, returned to his old Conference. Geo. Lovesee also passed from our territory after this year, falling into Rock River Conference at the division 104 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. that will be noted in due time, and did good work for years in connection with that body. Chauncey Hobart, who first appears this year on our soil, and in charge of Racine District, will be heard of hereafter. Few men among us ever obtained a more en- viable distinction. His district extended from Lake Mich- igan to the western boundary of Rock County, being com- posed of twelve pastoral charges, nine, as already stated, being taken from Milwaukee District, viz.: Racine, South- port, Sylvania, Rochester, Geneva, Elkhorn, Troy, Janes- ville, and Big Foot. Beloit was taken from Mount Morris District, and Whitewater from Fond du Lac. To these was added Union Circuit, newly formed from territory taken apparently from Janesville and Madison Circuits. A. Hanson, who had done very successful work in Milwaukee two years before, as a supply, had become con- nected with the Conference, and had served Galena the previous year, now appears in the list of appointments as pastor at Southport. It is remarkable that of the one hundred and seventeen that had been in our lists of appointments previous to this year, not one had reached the end of his pilgrimage. Some of these, it is true, had been on the ground but one year; but others had been here several years. A careful investigation shows that more than three hundred and fifty years of ministerial service had been performed in Wiscon- sin before a death occurred among the ministers. C. D. Cahoon, who had spent one year among us, was called to his reward soon after leaving our bounds; and, so far as is known, he was the only one of the hundred and seventeen. But during the Conference year commencing August 11, 1847, death invaded our ranks, and bore away two—Geo. Whitman and Joseph Lewis. ; Mr. G. H. FOSTER. Mr. EDWIN HYDE. Rev. R. W. BOSWORTH, D. D. Rev. JOSEPH ANDERSON. PART LI. HISTORY OF WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER I. 1848-9. HE Rock River Conference, at its session in 1847, took measures for the division of its territory by the forma- tion of a separate Conference in Wisconsin. The General Conference in the May following sanctioned this proceeding, and constituted the Wisconsin Conference, which embraced the entire State. For twelve years this domain had an or- ganized Territory. On the 29th of May, 1848, it was ad- mitted into the Union as a State. So its birth, as such, was almost simultaneous with that of our Conference. This newly formed body held its first session in South- port (now Kenosha), commencing July 12, 1848. Bishop Morris presided, and on the Sabbath preached to a large concourse in a grove or park of that rising city. The bishop was a remarkable man. Measured by the standard of those who deem bluster and dash evidences of superiority, he surely would not be called great, for he was the far- thest possible from these. His sermons were short, earnest, evangelical, simple in construction, terse in style, and full ‘of thought. A word added to or taken from almost any one of his sentences would have marred its beauty, and detracted from its force. Ia short, few men could pack 9 106 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. as much bacon in a small knapsack as he. He was elected to the episcopacy in 1836. Presuming that many would feel an interest in reading the appointments of this first session of our Conference who have not access to them, they are here given: PLATTEVILLE Disrrict—Henry Summers, Presiding Elder. Platteville—I. M. Leiby. Lancaster and Potosi—Francis Smith, R. E. Thomas. Hazel Green—I. Searls, J. W. Putnam. Hamilton Grove—Jesse Pardun. Mineral Point—J. G. Whitford. Dodgeville—David Brooks. Franklin— Asa Wood. Monroe—A. P. Allen. Prairie du Chien Mission—Wm. Tasker, Black River Mission—R. R. Wood. St. Croix Mission—Benjamin Close. Welsh Mission—To be supplied. Etk Grove—B. L. Thomas. Fonp pu Lac Disrricr—Washington Wilcox, Presiding Elder. Fond du Lac—H. R. Colman. Sheboygan—Stephen Jones, H. Leet. Manitowac—To be supplied. Green Bay Mission—S. R. Thorp. Oneida Indian Mission—S. W. Ford. Brothertuwn Indian Mission—D. Lewis. Winnebago Mission—A. B. Randall. Green Lake Mission—C. G. Lathrop; one to be supplied. Waupun—J. 8. Prescott; one to be supplied. Columbus—G. N. Hanson; one to be supplied. Centerville Mission—Samuel M. Stone. Portage—To be supplied. Lowell—Henry Requa; one to be supplied. Mayville Mission—O. Smith, W. H. Sampson, Principal of Preparatory Department of Lawrence Institute. MitwavuKkee Disrricr—Elihu Springer, Presiding Elder. Milwaukee—J. E. Willson. Walker’s Point—Warner Oliver. ANNALS OF 1848. 107 Root River—Jesse Halstead; one to be supplied. Grafton—J. W. Wood. West Bend Mission—A. C. Pennock. Wauwatosa—H. V. Train, Ricbard Shane. Waukesha—Wesson G. Miller. Oconomowoc Mission—S. W. Martin. Watertown Mission—John Bean. Aztalan—Wm. Willard. Palmyra Mission—H. W. Frink. Madison Mission—John Penman. Albion Mission—Edrick Holmes. Pleasant Valley Mission—C. G. Adams. Prairie du Sauk Mission—J. Williams. Racine Disrrict--C. Hobart, Presiding Elder. Racine—Mathew Bennett. Southport—A. Hanson. Sylvania—R. J. Harvey, C. R. Foster. Rochester—W. M. Osborn. Geneva—To be supplied. Elkhorn—R. W. Barnes. Troy—J. M. Snow. Delavan and South Grove—R. P. Lawton, S. H. Stocking Sup. Whitewater—Leonard Dickins. Rock Prairie—J. M. Walker. Janesville—Wesley Lattin. Union—C. McClure, H. Hersey. Spring Valley—John Luckock. Beloit—Eli C. Jones. Exeter—To be supplied. Geo. Lovesey transferred to Rock River Conference. The reader will note that the Conference starts in active work with four presiding elders’ districts, fifty-seven pastoral charges, and one institution of learning, manned by sixty-two preachers; and provision made to employ ten more. We find also, in the Minutes, one supernumerary preacher and three superannuates. The entire member- ship, including probatiovers and local preachers, was 6,943— more than twice the number constituting the Christian 108 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. i: Church at the close of the Great Pentecost. The latter force was to subjugate the world to Christ, the former to aid in extending his reign in Wisconsin. The following pages will give a partial view of their success. ; Ten new men appeared in the Minutes, seven of whom were admitted at this Conference. Seven new pastoral charges also appear—‘‘ new” in name rather than in terri- tory, though some new ground was occupied. Walker’s Point was the Fifth Ward of Milwaukee, on the south side of Menominee River. West Bend and Wauwatosa were substantially Menom- inee Mission of the previous year, now demanding the labors of three preachers, instead of one as then. Albion had probably formed a part of Madison Circuit ; and Pleasant Valley, of Aztalan, and perhaps is nearly identical with Summit of 1846. Elk Grove seems to have been mostly included in Hamilton Grove, and Spring Valley in Union. Exeter and Rock Prairie Missions probably covered much new ground. J. M. Walker, long and favorably known to us since then, was in charge of the latter. In the western part of his circuit was a village of about two hundred inhabitants, called Indian Ford. Here was ‘a small class,” but it could enjoy the preacher’s services only once in every two weeks. A few miles west was another vil- lage called Catfish, of about the same size and natural ele- ments of growth. Ofcourse they were rivals. ‘‘In order to attract settlers and build up their town, the Catfish people employed a Universalist minister to reside among them and preach every Sabbath. During the winter of 1848-9 nearly the entire population of the town of Indian Ford was converted. This event completely revolutionized the character of the place. Immigrants came pouring in, business became brisk, a church edifice was erected, a good school wasestablished, and the population more than doubled.” ANNALS OF 1848. 109 The results of the agencies in the two places being so entirely opposite that the Catfish people seemed to awake to the idea that ‘godliness is profitable unto all things,” and moved, perhaps, by no higher motive than worldly gain, discussed the matter among themselves, and appointed a committee to wait on Rev. ©. Hobart, the presiding elder of the district, and ‘‘ request him to send them a gospel minister.” The request was honored, and the place put in charge of the preacher on Union Circuit. Surely ‘their rock is not as our Rock, our enemies themselves being judges.” W. H. Sampson was nominally principal of the Law- rence Institute, but as there was no building yet in which to open it, he was to act asagent till one should be erected. To this work he applied himself diligently. About this time the excitement over the discovery of gold in California began to prevail. It arose to a fever- heat in some instances, and ‘“‘carried off” a considerable number of our people. Rev. Warner Oliver, the pastor at Walker’s Point, was either so affected by it, or so desir- ous to care for its victims, that he left his charge and went to the Pacific Coast. This was the second year of his con- nection with Wisconsin. His subsequent history can not be given here. Many of the pastoral charges had become very much contracted by the formation of new ones from their terri- tory. A few had lost their names in the same way. But the membership had greatly increased. For example, the ground covered by Iowa Circuit at its formation in 1834, from which were reported 80 members at the close of that year, had now become six separate charges with 1,311 members. Aztalan, formed from new ground in 1837, had growninto eleven charges with an aggregate member- ship of 1,317. Well has this been called ‘‘ the mother of circuits.” 110 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Benj. Close was appointed to St. Croix, and at some time during the year he organized a class at St. Paul, which then meant only a place where the French Catholics had a log church known by that name. Here, also, a rude building was erected on the lot donated the year before, and our people worshiped in it for a while, but for some reason the lot reverted to the donor. In that building Henry Summers, presiding elder of Platteville District, held the first quarterly meeting on Minnesota soil, in May, 1849. In Milwaukee our cause was growing in importance. The church edifice mentioned in the annals of 1843 had been completed, and a new pastoral charge had been de- veloped in the south part of the city, known as Walker's Point. Indeed, a general advance seems to have been made during this first year of our existence as a Confer- ence, though Mineral Point and Platteville—two very im- portant charges in the mines—suffered severely by seces- sions. In these churches was a large number of Englishmen. Some of these found it difficult to conform to American customs, especially to the manner of singing in the public congregation. For lack, perhaps, of mutual forbearance and concession, this dissatisfaction culminated in a secession of about one hundred members in each place, who found a more congenial home in the Primitive Methodist Church. Notwithstanding this, the reports from the entire Confer- ence show an aggregate membership of 6,942. This makes the apparent increase 1,436. But as Big Foot Circuit, with 294 members, was transferred by the division to Rock River Conference, the real gain was 1,711. This was an unusually large increase. Our benevolences were fewer in number than now. The reports show only three, viz.: Missionary Society, $517 ; ANNALS OF 1849, 111 American Bible Society, $119; Conference claimants, $92. Many object—and, perhaps, with good reason—to calling the latter a benevolence. As briefly stated in the annals of last year, GEORGE Wuitman and JosepH Lewis had passed from labor to rest. The former had done good work for five years, and on the 22d of October, 1847, soon after he reached his last appointment, he met his last foe; but ‘his triumph was complete.” Joseph Lewis’s labors on Fond du Lac and Sheboygan Circuits have already been noticed. He was appointed to Beloit in 1846, at which time that important place was made a separate charge; reappointed in 1847, and labored successfully till called to the rest of the faithful, May 22, 1848. 1849. The Conference this year met in Platteville, on the 26th day of June, Bishop Janes presiding. W. H. Samp- son was again elected secretary. It will be remembered that this is the second session of Wisconsin Conference, and also that the Rock River Conference held its second session in this village eight years before. Bishop Janes, elected to the Episcopacy in 1844, was on his first tour in what was then called ‘‘ the West ;” and, though in feeble health, he endeared himself to all as a judicious administrator and an ‘‘able minister of the New Testament.” At this session thirteen were admitted on trial, nine into full connection, and three by transfer from other Con- ferences, viz.: Elmore Yocum, from North Ohio; Philo 8. Bennett, from Black River; and Orrin F. Comfort, from Genesee. The first named, though not present at the Conference, was put in charge of Platteville District ; the second, of Platteville Station ; and the last, of Geneva, a place rapidly coming into prominence. 112 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. John Tibballs, formerly of the North Ohio Conference, was readmitted from the local ranks. One had died—James Ash, a decidedly good man, and a useful member of the Conference since 1840. He had been superannuated four years. H. R. Colman, who had performed many years of val- uable service (in Troy Conference previous to 1840, and in Wisconsin since that time), this year retired to superan- nuation, and A. B. Randall, who had rendered three years’ service, was returned supernumerary. Isaac Searls, who had been in Wisconsin two years, was superannuated, but soon regained his health, and did active service for several years. The eagle-eyed bishop had evidently been viewing the ground before he saw it, and had become impressed with the importance of the work developing in the Upper Mis- sissippi region. The Indian missions there had not been much of a success ; but white settlers were rushing thither, and the genius of our itinerancy required that they be met with the saving influence of the gospel. Besides, the ele- ments of physical enlargement there augured a populous country in the near future. The question, ‘‘ Who will go for us?” was appropriate and momentous. For some days this question remained unanswered. At length, Chauncey Hobart responded, ‘‘Here am I; send me.” His proffer was accepted, the Minnesota Mission District was formed, and he was ap- pointed its presiding elder, and also pastor of St. Paul’s. For three years there had been a mission at St. Croix, and the preachers there had skirmished along the line of Minnesota. But now it was determined to enter the cita- del, and take possession of the land made ready by the labors of Hurlburt, Putnam, and Close. Yet the heroic leader was accompanied with only four men—Enos Ste- vens, at St. Anthony’s Falls; James Harrington, at Still- ANNALS OF 1849. 1138 water; and Jesse Pardun and Charles Hill, on Bad Axe and Black River Mission. The last named charge was in Wisconsin. Of course the presiding elder confined himself mainly to St. Paul, visiting the other points when neces- sary. Subsequent events showed that they were not on the ground any too soon. E. Yocum succeeded H. Summers on Platteville District, and the latter followed C. Hobart on Racine District. Milwaukee and Fond du Lac Districts remained under the same supervision as the previous year. The reader has already seen that the writer of these chronicles was this year a new man in Wisconsin. He was present during several days of the preceding session of the Conference, and was deeply impressed with the earnest, aggressive spirit of its members; nor less so with the importance of more laborers in this growing field. The Conference, also recognizing the same, very cordially invited his transfer. These concurrent influences, together with a special impulse felt several weeks before, drawing him hither, which he has ever believed was of the Lord, produced a clear conviction that this was the place where the Master had the most need of him. But having just received an appointment in his own Conference, he could not come till the close of that year. Providence won- derfully opened the way for the consummation of the plan, and on the fifth day of June he started for what was deemed the far West, and arrived in Milwaukee on the 15th, via the Erie Canal and the ‘‘ Lakes.” This second session of Wisconsin Conference was of unusual length—commencing on the 27th of June and closing on the 9th of July. The cause of this was the trial of two of the members on charges preferred against each other. The difficulty seemed to have largely grown out of a misunderstanding. One was entirely acquitted, the other slightly censured. 114 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. When the appointments were announced, the writer found himself in charge of the Church there. He was not dissatisfied, though he had already come several hun- dred miles to reach the eastern boundary of Wisconsin, and Platteville was near its western line. It was one of the best appointments in the Conference in point of finan- cial and numerical strength and social position; yet, as there had been for some time an unfortunate partisan spirit prevailing, it was not deemed a very desirable place. Perhaps it was on this account that a stranger in the country was appointed there. It is due the people to say that the preacher met a very cordial reception among them, and a hearty co-operation. One instance is deserving of special notice. At the First Quarterly Conference, when he reported the amount of his traveling expenses from Milwaukee, Rev. Samuel Mitchell arose and moved that they allow his traveling expenses from his former charge in New York. The preacher ob- jected on the ground that he did not think he had any just claim to traveling expenses outside the bounds of the Con- ference. Mr. Mitchell replied: ‘‘The Conference invited his transfer, and it is only fair that we bear the expense of the entire removal.” The preacher, seeing the Conference was evidently in favor of the motion, arose and said, half playfully: ‘‘ Brethren, if you desire to pay my entire ex- penses from New York, allow me to suggest that you pay one half this year and one half next. I am told that you have never kept a preacher but one year. But I have moved so far that I expect to stay with you two years.” The motion was modified to meet the suggestion, which created a little pleasantry, and was adopted unanimously. They carried out their agreement to the letter, that year and the next. Such co-operation augured well; an extensive revival soon followed, and the last vestige of the old partisan feud ANNALS OF 1849, 115 disappeared. The presiding elder proved himself the man for the place, as he has for every place to which he has since been assigned. The district contained four new charges, viz.: Patch Grove, taken from Lancaster and Potosi of the previous year; Council Hill, that had formed a part of Hazel Green Circuit; Exeter Mission, transferred from Racine District ; and Wyoming Valley, which seems to have included much of the territory embraced in the Helena work, dropped from the list of appointments some years before. St. Croix Mission was included in the Minnesota Dis- trict under another name. Linden makes its first appearance this year in the Minutes, not as a separate charge, but in connection with Dodgeville. The year proved to be one of very considerable pros- perity throughout the district; there was an increase in the membership of about twenty-four per cent. In Fond du Lac District there was a general change of pastors—S. W. Ford, at Oneida, being the only one that remained in his former field. But in the pastoral charges there was but little change, and that mostly in names. Monitowoc was dropped out. Sheboygan became two—Sheboygan and Sheboygan Falls. Portage of last year is now Plover Portage, thus show- ing its location in Portage County, and not what is known as Portage City, in Columbia County. Marcellon is a new charge, though possibly only changed from Centerville of the previous year. Beaver Dam and Oshkosh, now two very important appointments, come to the front this year. So far as ap- pears, A. P, Allen was the first Methodist preacher in Beaver Dam. While on the Waupun Circuit, in 1846-7, he established an appointment there, and formed the first 116 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. class, of which L. H. Marvin was leader. The exact date is unknown. Religious services were first held in a car- penter-shop. At some time during the Conference year, just indicated, a church edifice, 26 by 40 feet, was com- menced and slowly carried to completion through a series of years. Beaver Dam seems to have formed a part of Lowell Circuit next year, of which H. Requa had charge. The reader can trace in previous pages the earlier his- tory of Oshkosh from a point in Winnebago Circuit to a separate pastoral charge. The Legislature had changed the corporate name of Lawrence Institute to Lawrence University. Whatever may be thought now of the propriety of giving such an im- posing name to an institution yet in embryo, it showed that its friends were in l.igh expectation as to what it would be. W. H. Sampson was again appointed principal of its pre- paratory department. On the twelfth day of November this department was opened with a very encouraging num- ber of students, in an unfinished building in the center of the block next north of the Methodist Church property, in the city of Appleton. His associates were R. O. Kellogg and Jas. M. Phinney, professors, and Miss Emeline M. Crocker, preceptress. The pastoral charges of Milwaukee and Racine Dis- tricts underwent but few changes. In the former, Adams, a new appointment, was a part of Prairie du Sauk Mission of the previous year. In the latter, South Grove, which was connected with Delavan, becomes the head of a new circuit. Exeter was transferred to Platteville District. Honey Creek is another name for Rochester of last year. Eagleville is a new charge, taken evidently from Palmyra Circuit. The reader will readily see that as the country becomes populous, the boundaries of pas- toral charges become better established. The presiding elder on this district was reared in a more southern latitude, and he ANNALS OF 1849, 117 found some customs among the people in his new field— who were almost entirely from Eastern States—that were not at first very agreeable to him. He was a thorough Methodist, a preacher of the older style, strongly attached to the usages to which he had beenaccustomed. But being a man of good common sense, as well as piety, he so man- aged as to avoid unpleasant friction. John Penman, stationed at Beloit, left his work in the midst of the year for the land of gold, and his place was supplied by A. P. Allen, removed from Elkhorn. Whitewater, that had been in the list of appointments for several years, and had been visited by Pioneer Hal- stead as early as 1837, had not yet come into much prom- inence as a post of Zion. It is difficult to ascertain just when or by whom the first class was organized there. The first church edifice was commenced under the administra- tion of L. Dickens, the previous year. Jas. Harrington, who enters the itinerant ranks this year, was then a local preacher in that charge. It is said he went into the woods, cut, hewed, and hauled the timber, and did most of the work with his own hands—all without cost to the society. James AsH had passed on to his final home. He was received on trial in 1840, and did effective service for four years, when he was returned superannuated, in which re- lation he continued until his death. He was a man of marked piety. Of him it is said: ‘‘ Religion was his con- stant theme in public and in private. It was the atmos- phere he breathed and the element in which he lived.” The reports of the year show a total membership, in- cluding preachers, of 7,295 —increase, 277; $89 collected for Conference Claimants, $527 for missions, and $334 for the Bible Society. 118 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER II. 1850-1. HE Conference this year met in Beloit, commencing July 3d. Bishop Hamline presided, and J. E. Wilson was elected secretary. This first and only visit of the bishop was hailed with great delight by the preachers. He had presided at the Rock River Conference in Galena, in 1846, so that he was personally known to the older members; and all had con- siderable knowledge of him. How could it be otherwise ? At the memorable General Conference of 1844 he proved himself a masterly expositor of law, civil and ecclesias- tical. In the case of Bishop Andrew, he made a speech so logical, so forceful, so convincing, as to remove all doubt, from the minds of the Northern delegates at least, as to the constitutionality of the proposed action. This turned their minds to him at once as the man fora bishop. After the settlement of that case it was decided to elect two bishops. As the Southern delegates knew they could not elect one of their own number, or one who had voted in favor of Bishop Andrew, and as they would not support one who had voted against him, they sought a candidate outside the General Conference. The result was the election of Leonidas L. Hamline and Edmund Storer Janes. Both were well and favorably known throughout the connection. The former had been editor of the Ladies’ Repository during the preceding quadrennium ; the latter had been for sev- eral years financial secretary of the American Bible Soci- ANNALS OF 1850, 119 ety. We had, the year before, enjoyed the presidency of the latter; now we were favored with that of the former. We were pleased with both; but we found Bishop Ham- line so rigid in the enforcement of order as to be a little annoying to some. We have seldom had a better spirit- al atmosphere at an Annual Conference than prevailed at this. The business of the Conference proceeded with great dispatch. A committee was appointed on ‘‘ Temperance and the Use of Tobacco,” and brought in a very sensible report on each. By its adoption, the Conference ‘‘heartily ap- proved” a stringent liquor-law recently enacted by our State Legislature, and pledged all proper resistance to ef- forts for its repeal. Moreover, it characterized the tobacco habit as a ‘‘ wasteful and filthy practice;” and pledged itself to ‘‘discountenance its use in any form, both by precept and example.” In following years the Conference wrestled with these gigantic evils even more vigorously. Beloit, that had been a pastoral charge since 1846, had become a point of considerable importance. The breth- ren there were struggling against strong competition. Several persons from New England had located at this point some years before, and soon proceeded to found a college, under the joint patronage of the Congregationalists and Presbyterians of Wisconsin and Northern Illinois. This, of course, drew many members and friends of those denominations to the place, and gave them financial and social, as well as numerical, strength. Thus, Methodism was placed at disadvantage. Probably many new-comers, who would have gravitated to us under equally favorable circumstances, were attracted by the larger bodies by a sort of ‘ natural law in the spiritual world.” Yet we had a living force there. A neat, commodious church edifice had been erected. It was built of stone, 120 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. with a basement partly above ground. It was begun in the Conference year 1846-7, and the auditorium was ready for occupancy the year following. In this con- dition we found it in 1850. Great economy must have been used in its construction thus far, as it had cost only $4,300. Still, over it hung an embarrassing debt of about one thousand dollars beyond the ability of the society to raise. The matter was brought before the Conference and fully explained. The bishop proposed to give two hundred dol- lars towards the liquidation of the debt, and the members of the Conference pledged about eight hundred dollars more, thus rescuing the church from impending peril. The pledges generally ran from two to ten dollars each. These were large sums for the preachers in those days to pay from their scanty receipts. Here it may be stated that the charter of Lawrence University required the annual election of nine visitors from the Conference, who, with the trustees, should constitute a ‘¢ Joint Board,” for the transaction of all business pertain- ing to the said university. The visitors appointed at the preceding Conference made a very encouraging report at this. Though the school had not been in operation a year, and was literally located in the woods, accessible only by bad roads that can hardly be conceived of by many of my readers, it was found that there had been in attendance 105 students—the highest number at one time being 80. The Oommittee on Education gave it a hearty commenda- tion, and the Conference as heartily pledged co-operation in promoting its interests. At this Conference eighteen were admitted on trial, two located—John Tibballs and Wm. Tasker; Chas. McClure gave up his parchments, but retained his member- ship in the Church; Stephen Jones withdrew from the connection, and five were returned as superannuated ; three ANNALS OF 1850, 121 were transferred from our Conference—J. E. Willson, who had been with us two years, doing great service as pastor of Spring Street Church, Milwaukee, to Missouri Conference ; Frank Smith, an active, useful, growing young man, to Rock River Conference, where he rose to considerable promi- nence, and died January 4, 1889, having performed many years of successful work. J. Luckock was also transferred, but to what Conference is not stated. He became a member of Rock River Conference, but subsequently was trans- ferred to the Central Illinois Conference. He was a man of considerable ability, especially as a controversialist. He passed to his reward several years since, having been for some time on the retired list. J. Penman, mentioned in the annals of last year, was deprived of his ministerial standing for leaving his work without sufficient cause. In California he joined the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, but afterwards returned to this country, and for a short time was connected with our work in Minnesota. Dr. Hobart, the historian of that Conference, summarizes his career thus: ‘‘This man left behind him only a record of dishonor and disloyalty.” The changes above narrated left the Conference with eighty effective men—sixteen less than the growing work demanded. But our well-adapted economy enabled the presiding elders to supply these vacancies. The five districts were in charge of the same men as the year before, with no change in their boundaries except the transfer of two or three charges to Minnesota Mission District. Of course there was expansion wherever there was opportunity. Minnesota District was enlarged so that it took in not only all of that territory, but all of Wisconsin west and north of the Wisconsin River. This was a vast region of almost unbroken forest. It is difficult to conceive that a country teeming with inhabitants and dotted with villages 10 122 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. and cities, was so recently the undisturbed haunt of wild beasts. Some of the trips of the presiding elder present very romantic scenes. Here is one: On his first round he wished to pass from Baraboo to Round Prairie, about where Viroqua now stands. To reach it by any well-known route would cost about two hundred miles’ travel, with slow and difficult means of traveling. So far as he could Jearn from a study of the map, it was about eighty miles directly west ; but between him and it there was a continuous and dense forest. He proposed to try this route if two men would join him. Six volunteered. It was Tuesday, and they wished to reach their destination by Friday, as the elder had a camp-meeting appointed to begin there that day. Providing themselves with provisions for three and a half days, they plunged into the wilderness, with no guide but the ‘‘ king of day” anda pocket-compass. They journeyed on, meandering somewhat, encountering thunder-storms, and sleeping one or two nights where the bears had but re- cently enjoyed similar repose, until their provisions were gone. It was now Saturday morning, and yet they knew not where they were with respect to their objective point. Strangely, game seemed scarce. And yet hunger was ren- dering theirs a perfect ‘‘ woodchuck case.” But instead of this animal, they succeeded in killing a porcupine. It was soon flayed, cut into seven pieces, roasted on the ends of as many long sticks, and eaten with the blessing of the Lord invoked upon this hastily extemporized meal. Strengthened thereby, they journeyed on, and reached the camp-ground early Sabbath morning, weary, but grateful for Providential guidance. The camp-meeting was very suc- cessful, though attended by but few ministers. ‘‘About fifty were converted and added to the Church.” In Fond du Lae District there was much enlargement— no less than seven new pastoral charges appearing in the ANNALS OF 1850, 123 list. These, as already noted in other cases, did not indi- cate entirely new ground. Byron was probably included the year before in Fond du Lac Circuit; Kingston and Dart- ford in Green Lake; Appleton in Oshkosh; and Green Bush in Sheboygan Falls. Metomen and Omro seem to have been formed largely from new territory; and, indeed, much of the others were also. all River probably took the place in name of Columbus. J. M. S. Maxson, just received on trial, was appointed to Omro Mission, but there was no organized society there. The first class was formed the following winter (1850-1), with thirteen members, viz.: M. T. Holcomb, wife, and two children; J. W. Craig and wife, Elijah Clark and wife, Chas. Rogers and wife, a Miss Dodge, and probably a few others whose names the writer has not been able to obtain. , Appleton (or the place where it now is) was included in the Winnebago Circuit in 1848, in charge of A. B. Randall. As yet the primeval forest there and in all that region remained intact. On the eighth day of September, 1848, W. H. Sampson began to cut the trees, and prepare a way to the spot where the Preparatory School-building was to be erected. On the 8th of October he preached in a rude shanty, just completed by J. F. Johnston, which stood on the north side of College Avenue, between Mor- rison and Durkee Streets. This, so far as is known, was the first human habitation erected by a white man within the limits of the present city of Appleton. The contemplated school-building was erected in the cen- ter of the block, bounded by the same streets on the west and east, immediately south of College Avenue. It was afterwards destroyed by fire. In February, 1849, A. B. Randall formed the first class in the place, consisting of Robert R. Bateman, leader; R. 8. Bateman, Mary Bateman, Amelia Bateman, Electa 124 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Norton, Theresa Randall, L. L. Randall, and J. F. John- ston. The next month he organized a Sabbath-school—R. R. Bateman, superintendent. At the Conference of 1849, Oshkosh took the place of Winnebago as the name of the charge, with Cornelius Smith, pastor. In 1850 Appleton was detached, and became the head of a circuit, embracing Neenah and Menasha. The ten thousand dollars necessary to secure the like sum from Mr. Lawrence, had not yet been all pledged, and as it was thought no one would be as likely to obtain the needed amount as W. H. Sampson, he was appointed agent of the institution. To Milwaukee District were added five new pastoral charges by division and the acquisition of new territory. These were Oak Creek, taken from Root River; Hartford, probably included last year in Oconomowoc; Bark River, Sun Prairie, and Norwegian Mission. Adams and Prairie du Sauk were transferred to Minnesota District. This Norwegian Mission was located at Cambria. It was the first mission on this continent established by our Church for the special benefit of Norwegians and Danes, and was this year supplied by C. Willerup, of whom and his work we shall have good reports hereafter. The special changes in Racine District were very novel. Instead of expansion, there was contraction. Honey Creek, East Troy, Eagleville, and South Grove were merged into other charges. Milton appears as the head of a circuit, known the previous year as Rock Prairie, and Kenosha is now the name of the place formerly called Southport. At the Conference of 1850 a plan was adopted for the publication of our Annual Minutes. It was this: Rev. A. Brunson, then a superannuate, gave his dividend, $67.01, as a nucleus of a fund for this purpose, which ANNALS OF 1851. 125 fund should be kept good by the payment at each Confer- ence thereafter for the Minutes taken by the preachers. The rest of the sum needed was made up by different parties. The report of the Sunday-school Department this year was as follows: Schools, 144; officers and teachers, 1,132; scholars, 4,826; volumes in library, 9,165; Bible classes, 63; scholars in infant classes, 252; conversions, 183; for ex- penses of schools, $620.04; and for Sunday-school Union, $42.71. The report informs us that a decided advance was made during the year—from 30 to 50 per cent. The number of church edifices was 36, and of parson- ages 31. For further account of these, and for all statistics in following years, the reader is referred to the appropriate appendices. 1851. On the twenty-fifth day of June the fourth session of the Wisconsin Conference commenced. It was held in a small edifice in Waukesha, the first one erected by our people there for a house of worship. W. H. Sampson was elected secretary. At the two next preceding Conferences, we had the pres- idency of Janes and Hamline, respectively. They were elected in 1844, amid the partisan excitement over the action of the General Conference in the Hardin and An- drew cases. Though elected on different issues apparently, they both stood on the same platform of loyalty to the Church in its antagonism to the further encroachment of slavery. | Beverley Waugh, elected bishop in 1836, presided at our session this year. He was rather small in stature, with a piercing eye that took in all the features of every pass- ing scene. This greatly aided him in being ‘‘ master of the situation.” At this Conference a Committee on Slavery was ap- 126 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. pointed. In due time they made a report, too moderate in tone to suit the writer, on whose motion the committee was appointed; but as no test of sentiment on this subject ‘had ever come before the Conference, he, and others of his views, would gladly have voted in its favor if it had been acted on at once. But as some discussion was anticipated, and as some other business was just then pressing, it was laid on the table, with the express understanding that it should come up at another time for action. But a fever for ad- journment set in, the cars were soon to go, and in the bustle the report continued to slumber; it never awoke. Though it can not here be reproduced, it is safe to say that it was probably in advance of any expression on the subject given by any Annual Conference of our Church west of the Alleghanics. In 1841 the Rock River Conference, goaded by peti- tions from the laymen, appointed a Committee on Slavery, but responded to the petitioners thus: “ Resolved, That it is inexpedient for this Conference to take any action on the subject of slavery.” This item of information is given in ‘‘ Memorials of Methodism in Rock River Conference,” and from that au- thority it seems that the Conference adhered to that resolu- tion till 1854. With us it was otherwise. We gave the question no rest, as will be seen, till it was settled by the utter destruc- tion of the system to which it related. Other subjects of interest engaged the attention of the Conference at that session for the first time, as the Bethel work, church and parsonage building, and missionary work among the Scandinavians. With the first we pledged hearty co-operation. A com- mittee appointed on the second, gave sume information and made some suggestions, valuable at the time, all of which the Conference indorsed. ANNALS OF 1851, 127 At the preceding Conference a Norwegian Mission had been arranged for in the appointments, and left to be sup- plied. The head-quarters of this mission were to be at Cambridge. It was supplied by C. Willerup, a Dane, con- verted at Savannah, Georgia, in 1844, and had become connected with Genesee Conference, in Western New York. As the Norwegian and Danish languages are essentially the same, he was well adapted to the work. When he went to it, few, if any, there had experimental knowledge of ‘the way of salvation,” if of the theory even. Yet many seemed tired of the lifeless ‘‘ form of godliness” in which they had been reared, and as they began to Jearn some- thing of ‘‘ the power thereof,” they became earnest inquir- ers after the ‘‘truth as it is in Jesus.” Mr. Willerup’s simple narration of the moral attitude of this people enthused the Conference, and steps were taken to aid in erecting a church edifice—the first Norwegian Methodist house of worship in the world. So extensive was the interest awakened in that field that three additional laborers were demanded. Just then Providence favored us with one. C. P. Agrelius, a Lutheran minister, late from Sweden, had received a spiritual baptism, and offered him- self for this work. He was accepted, and provision made for employing two more. ‘‘So mightily grew the word of God and prevailed.” More will be heard of these mission- aries, and of the work among the people of this nationality. This Conference also appointed a committee to consider the question of a “‘ Book depository and weekly paper in the northwestern portion of our Union.” An able report was submitted, in which the need of these was set forth in a forcible light, and heartily adopted. It recommended Chicago as the place, the Northwestern Christian Advocate as the name of the paper, and instructed our delegates elected to the General Conference of 1852 to use their in- fluence to secure these results. To make success more cer- 128 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. tain, the Conference instructed the secretary to furnish copies of the report to the bishop, to be presented to the Rock River and Iowa Conferences for their concurrence. It is scarcely necessary to add, that in due time our recom- mendations were carried into effect, almost to the very letter. The Conference this year, as formerly, showed a lively interest in our rising university. The Visiting Committee reported very favorably as to its doings and prospects. The conditions upon which Mr. Lawrence had pledged ten thousand dollars had been met, and a “‘ man of experience, [as a teacher] established reputation, and commanding in- fluence,” had been elected ‘“‘ president of the faculty.” This was Davis W. Clark (afterwards a bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church). Among the considerations to induce him to accept this position was a proffered salary of six bun- dred dollars and traveling expenses from the city of New York. The fact that he declined did not prove that the Board was too lavish in the use of funds. ‘David Brooks was elected traveling agent.” The Conference also showed itself in the front rank of workers in the temperance reform, pledging themselves to “‘preach at least one sermon on the subject of temperance during the year at each appointment in our [their] respec- tive charges.” Another measure of more importance than may appear to some, and one which it is feared has been too little re- garded, was to add to the by-laws of this Conference the following, viz.: ‘‘ Each member and probationer shall pre- pare and deposit with the secretary, to be put in the ar- chives of the Conference, a sketch of his life, including his birth, date and place of his conversion, and call to the min- istry, and the dates of his license, ordination (if ordained) and entering the itinerancy.” The Wisconsin Conference having been organized since the last preceding General Conference, this was the first ANNALS OF 1851. 129 time that delegates to a similar body could be elected by us. As no sharp issues were pending there was no special agitation over the matter. We were entitled to three dele- gates, and three good men were honored with an election, viz.: Chauncey Hobart, Wm. H. Sampson, and Henry Summers. As to the appointments, the most notable feature is the formation of two new districts—Madison and Fox River. Platteville, Minnesota, Racine, and Milwaukee Districts retained their former incumbents. I. M. Leihy was ap- pointed to the latter early in the last Conference year, to fill the vacancy caused by the death of the lamented Springer. W. G. Miller was appointed to Fond du Lac District, and W. Wilcox and Boyd Phelps, respectively, to the two first named. The location of all these except Fox River will be pretty well known by their names. Perhaps Dartford or Waupun would have been a more appropriate name, yet it extended north of Fox River as far as Wau- paca and Plover. Twelve new charges were made, several of them by the division of circuits. Prairie du Sauk was transferred from Minnesota District to Madison, and divided into two— one retaining the old name, the other called Reedsburg. Adams was changed to Baraboo. Thus placed, the presid- ing elder had little difficulty in reaching it; still he had an occasional opportunity for heroism of some sort. On one of his trips from Prairie du Chien to Black River he killed fourteen rattlesnakes. Some may take this also as proof of the special adaptation of Methodist preachers. If so, well. But it is evident that he and his fellow-helpers in that far off battle-field did much toward bruising the head of a serpent that for ages had been destroying the human race. Extensive revivals attended the word in different parts of the Conference as an increase of 1,950 communicants indicates. 11 130 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Fort Winnebago reappears among the appointments, after an absence of several years. De Pere had been included in Green Bay charge. Now, and henceforth, it becomes a separate appointment, except in one instance (1862). There was a large advance in all lines of Church work. Early in this Conference year, death invaded our ranks, and took.two very effective workers. Eisu SPRINGER, in charge of Milwaukee District for the last three years, fell a victim to that fearful disease the Asiatic cholera, on the 22d of August, 1850, in Ocon- omowoc, while making the first tour of his district for that year. He began his itinerant ministry in 1833, in the II- linois Conference, but had been identified with the work in Wisconsin only since 1845. He was a marked charac- ter—a man of great firmness and clear convictions. When a lad, sixteen years old, he was sent away to an academic institution, in which he was the only professor of religion among the students. He says: ‘‘I was taunted with be- ing a Methodist, hissed down, and hooted out of their com- pany.” This was a severe test of his piety, but he endured it heroically. It probably aided in developing the strong man, the talented and influential preacher that he was. On the day of Mr. Springer’s death he dined with Rev. David Brooks, our pastor at Watertown; and in less than twelve hours both he and Mrs. Brooks passed to their final home by the same terrible disease. JAMES HARRINGTON, a probationer of the second year in the Conference, succumbed to the same disease just the day before Mr. Springer’s departure, at his home in Still- water, Minnesota. ANNALS OF 1852. 131 CHAPTER III. 1852-3. / T the Sixteenth General Conference, held in May, 1852, four bishops were elected, viz.: Levi Scott, Matthew Simpson, Osmon C. Baker, and Edward R. Ames. The last named began his episcopal work as president of the Wisconsin Conference, which commenced its session on the second day of September next following, in Fond du Lac ; Wm. H. Sampson was re-elected secretary. At this Conference fifteen were admitted on trial, and all but two of the twenty-three admitted the year before were continued, and one was re-admitted ; one had died very triumphantly—C. G. Connable, a promising probationer of the second year. Six located, six were placed on the list of superannuates, and three were transferred to other Conferences. This left but a slight increase of effective men. The name of S. C. Thomas appears first in the list of appointments this year, though he had been transferred since our last session from Erie Conference, and stationed at Spring Street Church, Milwaukee. General harmony prevailed at this session, though a warm discussion occurred over the report on slavery. In view of the way action on this subject was shut off at the last Conference, the writer moved for the appointment of a committee, with instructions to report at a given hour on a specified day, and that the order of the day at that time should be the consideration of said report. This was car- ried, with but feeble opposition. 182 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. The committee consisted of five, of which O. F, Com- fort was chairman. At the appointed time he brought for- ward a good report, signed by only three of the committee; the other two, it was understood, could not fully indorse it, though they did not present a minority report. On the floor it was assailed by two or three influential and highly esteemed brethren of more conservative views. Of course ‘‘the irrepressible conflict” was upon us. Motions to amend, so as to modify the sentiments expressed, were made and advocated with great earnestness, and op- posed with as great earnestness, if not with equal ability. The effort to tone down the report was partially successful ; and then it was adopted as amended, five or six voting in the negative. Thus ended a bloodless battle with a deci- sive victory. The report is too lengthy to be given in full, but the reader is furnished, with enough to see its moral tone: “¢ Resolved, 1. That we are more than ever convinced of the great evil of American slavery, and hereby solemnly pledge to each other our best efforts and ardent prayers for its total abolishment.” “« Resolved, 3. That in the judgment of the Wisconsin Annual Conference, our Discipline should be so modified as to prevent the future admission of slaveholders into the Church, and require those members now holding slaves to set them at liberty, except in those instances in which, owing to the stringency of the slave laws, it may be found necessary to permit the legal relation to exist for the pro- tection and support of the slave.” Among other things, a very strong protest was made against the Fugitive-slave Law, recently enacted by Congress. These utterances may seem tame now, but then they were quite radical, and our Conference was thenceforward known as one of the most progressive on this subject. A Committee on Temperance, of which Dr. A. Brunson ANNALS OF 1852. 133 was chairman, presented a strong report, which was adopted with great unanimity. The Pine-tree State had enacted the original ‘‘Maine Law” a few months before, and this report fully committed the Conference thereto, and affirmed it as our ‘‘duty, as well as our right and privilege, to use our influence, both in and out of the pulpit, to procure its enactment.” This meant more than simply moral suasion. The report boldly advocated the use of the ballot in this work, ‘‘irrespective of party lines,” and called on “our people” to act accordingly. It also invited “the clergy of other denominations, and all friends of temperance, re- ligion, and good morals, to unite heartily, firmly, and pru- dently in this humane and noble effort.” Thus the Conference put itself boldly on record more than thirty-five years ago in favor of political action to pro- cure the enactment of a law totally prohibiting the liquor traffic, with stringent provisions for its enforcement. It is probable that few similar bodies, if any, of our Church or any other, preceded us in thus indorsing the best prohibitory liquor law ever before enacted in any State of our great Commonwealth. And we have never receded from our position. Nor was this all. The committee, according to instrue- tion, considered the question of alcoholic wine at the sacra- ment of the Lord’s Supper. The report gave good reasons for its disuse, and closed thus: ‘‘ Your committee recom- mend and earnestly advise brethren to procure the juice of the grape in the purest state possible for sacramental or medicinal purposes, regardless of expense or trouble.” When we consider the facts that very few grapes were then raised in this State, and that means of transportation were very limited, this will indicate a determination to make every practicable effort to give our people ‘the fruit of the vine” in the Eucharist according to the true Scriptural idea, instead of an alcoholic concoction of drugs labeled ‘‘ wine.” 134 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. The interests of our rising university were fully set forth in the reports of the Visiting Committee and of the Committee on Education. The former reported the elec- tion of Rev. E. Cook, of Boston, as president. The districts, except Minnesota, remained substantially the same as last year, and the incumbents the same, ex- cept that Isaac Searl was appointed to Madison District, and A. P. Allen to Racine. Very little change occurred in pastoral charges. Fay- ette, in Platteville District, Richland City and Delton, in Madison, and North Ward, in Fond du Lac, appear for the first time. J. 8. Prescott, who had been stationed in Fond du Lac the previous year, was a man of great energy, and by his indomitable zeal he had succeeded in securing the erection of two church edifices in that growing town. They were distant from each other about a mile and a half, and thus accommodated people in different extremes of the city. A few years before we read of a “‘ great conflagration ” in the place, by which ‘‘ the court-house, city hall, Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian, Congregational, and Episcopal churches were all consumed—in the district school-house.” At the period under consideration, each of the other Churches above named was represented by a respectable house of worship. There were nine other churches built during the year, none of which awakened more interest than the one in the Norwegian Mission, at Cambria. It will ever be known as the first Methodist Church in the world for the special benefit of that nationality, and probably the first of any Protestant denomination, except the Lutherans. The late General Conference had attached the Indian Missions at the head of Lake Superior and Sandy Lake to our territory, and they were placed in Minnesota Dis- trict. This made it of vast extent. Prairie du Chien, its ANNALS OF 1853. 135 southernmost appointment, and Sandy Lake, its northern extremity, were distant from each other eight hundred miles. The latter was four hundred miles from St. Paul, the residence of the presiding elder, and could be reached in winter only by dog-teams of the Hudson Bay Company, and in the summer by ascending the Mississippi in a canoe most of the way. Presiding elders now, who can ride in “palace cars in summer’s heat and winter’s cold, can prob- ably travel ten thousand miles with less fatigue and loss of time than one such trip involved. As usual, there was an advance in all the lines of Christian work. The General Conference of 1852 ordered the appoint- ment of some one at each annual conference to preach a missionary sermon at its next session. C. Hobart was ap- pointed to perform this service at our Conference in 1853. The reader is referred to Appendix G for the names of the appointees in the years following. 1853. On the thirty-first day of August, 1853, the Wisconsin Conference assembled in Baraboo for its sixth annual ses- sion. Bishop Scott presided, and 8S. W. Ford was elected secretary. Dr. Scott had attended one or two of our sessions as one of the book agents of the New York Concern, and endeared himself to us by his unaffected urbanity and great kindness of heart. On this account, if no other, he would have been cordially received. But he now came to us in a new relation, one which, in itself, inspired respect. He had been in his present office but little over a year, as the reader has seen. He left us with the profound respect of all. Baraboo was a thriving village in a region to which the tide of emigration had been increasing for a few years. A 136 WICONSIN CONFERENCE. class was formed there, February 5, 1842, by Thos. M. Fullerton, and thus made a part of the Muscoda Circuit. It had probably been connected with Prairie du Sauk most of the time thereafter till 1849, when it became the head of a circuit, under the name of Adams, which name it bore for two years, and was then called Baraboo. Though so young, the Conference was well sustained there. It is now an important appointment in the West Wisconsin Conference. That body has held several sessions there. During this Conference a camp-meeting was in progress in a grove near by, in which many of the younger ministers, whose time was not occupied in Conference business, labored with profit to themselves and the work. The savory influ- ence of the meeting was felt throughout the session. The reports of the Visiting Committee and of the Com- mittee on Education, showed that our cherished institu- tion, Lawrence University, was in a very prosperous con- dition. Rev. Edward Cook, A. M., elected president the year before, had entered upon the duties of his office. Rey. D. Brooks, general scholarship agent, had sold schol- arships to the amount of $10,000. ‘‘H. Requa, who spent a few months as Indian scholarship agent, obtained $2,900; and J. S. Prescott, foreign agent, had secured in cash and valuable pledges $17,300.” This was a very fine showing; but, alas! it never showed as well thereafter. The report of the Visiting Committee also represented that the annual exhibition of the students was of a high order; that the president-elect gave a fine inaugural ad- dress, and was duly inducted into office; and that the cor- ner-stone of the college edifice ‘‘ was laid by Dr. M. C. Darling, the president of the Board of Trustees, and an appropriate address was delivered by Rev. Alfred Brunson, accompanied with appropriate religious exercises.” It also appeared that ‘‘the mineralogical cabinet and apparatus of the late Professor Buck, of Milwaukee, con- ANNALS OF 1858. 137 sisting of astronomical, philosophical, and chemical instru- ments, had been procured, in exchange for lands in Wal- worth County.” This was deemed a very fortunate bargain ; but time changed the aspect of the case very much. The Committee say further: ‘‘ In addition to the above, the foreign agent, since the meeting of the joint board, has obtained $2,200; President Cook has secured a library and additional apparatus worth about $1,000, which, when added to the former ones on hand, with the cabinet and apparatus are valued at $3,000, making the whole prop- erty of the university worth at least $77,000.” In this sum were included the estimated value of the college grounds and of building material on hand. It seemed, therefore, but reasonable that they should say: ‘‘ Never in the history of this rising institution have its prospects been so flattering as at present.” They recommended, and the Conference concurred in, the appointment of J. S. Pres- cott as foreign agent, H. Requa as Indian scholarship, and A. B. Randall and Asa Wood as general scholarship agents. The following resolution, adopted by the Conference, shows still further its interest in the cause of education : ‘* Resolved, That each preacher in charge of a circuit or station, shall preach, or cause to be preached, at least oncé a year, a sermon on education at each principal ap- pointment.” , How well this was carried into effect, the writer has no means of knowing. Nor was this all. At a meeting of the preachers of Racine District, held in Janesville a few months before, the question of establishing an academical institution in that city was raised, and, after a free discussion, and con- sultation with prominent laymen, the meeting resolved, with great unanimity, to attempt it. A little inquiry revealed the fact that there was a very suitable building almost in the heart of the city, on a plat 138 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. of ground sufficiently large—about two acres—that could be purchased or rented at a very reasonable rate. It was a stone edifice, two stories high, built for school pur- poses, and could have been purchased for the small sum of $2,000. The matter was left in the hands of a committee, with considerable discretionary power. They rented the prop- erty, employed a Seventh-day Baptist as principal, and the school was opened in the fall with such favorable auspices as to induce the Conference to appoint a Board of Visitors. But it was soon found that the principal, though represented as ‘‘almost a Methodist,” seemed to take special pains to display his disregard for the Christian Sabbath. The school sank into disrepute, and was soon given up. Thus ended ‘‘ the Janesville Wesleyan Seminary,” which, with proper management, might have been a grand success. In reference to the temperance and anti-slavery ques- tions, the Conference maintained its high position. The last State Legislature had submitted to the voters the question as to a prohibitory liquor law, and it was to be voted on at the approaching election. As the Conference at its last session had taken positive ground in favor of such a law, and had, indeed, led other ecclesiastical bodies in this enterprise, so at this it boldly met the issue. An extract from the report on temperance, which was enthusiastically adopted, will show the unflagging deter- mination of the Conference. After an unqualified indorse- ment of the ‘‘ Maine Liquor Law,” they ‘recommended that all the members of this Conference whose fields of labor may be in Wisconsin exert their influence by preach- ing or by lecturing on temperance, and by all other appro- priate means calculated to secure a prohibitory law; and we do hereby solemnly pledge ourselves as a Conference, and publish our determination to the world, that whatever may be the other qualifications of candidates for the Leg- ANNALS OF 1858. 139 islature of the State, no man shall have our support who shall either neglect or refuse to give perfect satisfaction that, if elected, he will both vote and labor for a prohibitory en- actment that will be creditable to our State, and will be adapted to suppress the great evil of intemperance.” This was nearly forty years ago, and it is earnestly com- mended to those who now, after being deceived and be- trayed by politicians. over and over again, will continue to vote in the same line for fear of ‘‘ weakening our party.” The report on slavery was fully up to that of the pre- ceding year in moral tone, and was adopted with less oppo- sition. The first and fifth resolutions will give the reader an idea of its general character : ‘* Resolved, 1. That slavery is contrary to the laws of God, man, and nature; hurtful to society, contrary to the dictates of conscience and pure religion, and the doing to others what we would not they should do to us. “ Resolved, 5. That it is the opinion of the Wisconsin Annual Conference that the original design of the general rule prohibiting ‘the buying and selling of men, women, and children, with the intention to enslave them,’ was to pre- vent all traffic in human beings by members of the Meth- odist Episcopal Church, and that it should now be so interpreted and enforced.” Our Conference has the honor of opening fraternal cor- respondence with other ecclesiastical bodies, which dates from this year, as seen by the following resolutions, unan- imously adopted by the Conference : ‘Resolved, 1. That a delegate be appointed by this Conference to the State Convention of Presbyterian and Congregational Churches in Wisconsin, to tender to said body, at its next session, our fraternal salutations, with a view to cultivate more extensively feelings of reciprocity between the said Convention and the Wisconsin Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church. 140 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. “ Resolved, 2. That Rev. O. F. Comfort be, and he is hereby, appointed said delegate.” Our delegate performed his duty faithfully, and asked the Convention to reciprocate, which they did by appoint- ing one to bear their greetings to our next Conference. The measure thus introduced has been kept up with con- siderable regularity between us and those Churches, in their representative character, to the present time. ‘‘ Be- hold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity,” even though they may differ on some points. This Conference made a new departure in Sabbath- school work. An agent was appointed ‘‘to travel as ex- tensively as possible within the bounds of this Conference, and use all proper and practicable means within his power to promote the interest of Sabbath-schools within our limits.” H. W. Frink, one of our earlier pioneers, was appointed to this work, and he was also to associate with it the interests of the Tract Society of our Church. * In looking over the general work, it was found to have greatly increased, especially in Minnesota and in Northwest Wisconsin. Immigration was rapidly filling those re- gions, and the ubiquitous itinerancy must thrust its men into the frontiers to meet the demands of the case. Ten new pastoral charges were formed in that part of our work. This required the formation of a new district also; hence, Prairie du Chien District came this year into existence, with A. Brunson, presiding elder. David Brooks was placed in charge of Minnesota Dis- trict, and S. C. Thomas of Platteville. The other five districts retained their former incum- bents. In these the changes of pastoral charges were but few. Beetown, in Platteville District, is a new work, and Montfort is another name for Franklin. ANNALS OF 1858. 141 South Bristol, Hebron, Monticello, Berlin, Montello, and Jackson Street, Milwaukee, appear in the Minutes for the first time. The latter was a development of ‘ City Mis- sion,” formed the year before, and connected with Grove Street, under the pastoral eare of J. M. S. Maxson. Soon after the last Conference, the Universalist Church that stood on the site of the afterwards ill-fated Newhall House, was purchased for four hundred dollars and moved to a lot on Jackson Street, which had been purchased by Geo. F. Austin and Osmon Bailey, for eleven hundred dollars. ‘When fitted up, the edifice and lot cost two thousand dollars, and was dedicated December 1, 1852, by Rev. A. Hanson.” Most of the other last named charges also were formed from territory previously occupied. Not so with all in the ‘“‘upper country.” Take one case: At this Conference Benton County Mission was formed. It included all the country above the Falls of St. Anthony—a tract one hundred and thirty miles in length, and in the entire region were but two Methodists—Lucy Olmstead, near Fort Ripley, and Mrs. Becker, near Sauk Rapids. To this mission, Jas. H. White, an energetic, ear- nest man, was appointed. He established ten ‘‘ preaching places,” some of which are important points now in the Minnesota Conference. With the exception of C. Hobart, who constituted himself a scouting party the year before, while presiding elder on St Paul District, this missionary was the first voice crying in that wilderness, ‘‘ Prepare ye the way of the Lord!” A serious calamity-came to our cause this year in Mil- waukee. On the night of January 14, 1854, the Spring Street Church edifice was consumed by fire. During the rest of the year the Church worshiped in Young’s Hall. At this Conference 22 were received on trial, 19 were continued, 4 located, 3 probationers were discontinued at 142 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. their own request, 1 was returned supernumerary, 5 super- annuated, 1 deposed, and 114 appointed to active work. There were 112 pastoral charges, and among these 27 places to be supplied. If these were all filled, as is prob- able, the entire force of effective preachers was 141, with a total membership of 11,593. An increase of 837 is a good indication of fidelity and success. The total of benevo- lent collections were $2,518. The custom of giving ‘‘ quarterly” or ‘‘ love-feast tickets,” introduced by Mr. Wesley, had been for years going into neglect. So faras the writer can determine, this was the last year he observed it, and he thinks but few con- tinued it to that time. As it is probable that many who read these pages never saw one, a fac-simile of the only one he finds among the papers of his departed wife is here given. It was issued several years before this, as the reader will see. FOI BI IS AIBAISO ES IP IID IAAI SS FIO 6. € Bosiaeee INO OB LON Na ONANISM METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, FOUNDED A. D. 1784. Member. POLAR et QUARTERLY TICKET, oe/rgy. 5, 1848. PhP &f Bexsete Minister, ay Christ died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him.—1 Thess. y, 10. In assurance of hope, we to Jesus look up, Till his banner unfurl’d in the air From our graves we shall sce, and cry out, “It ishe!”’ And fly up to acknowledge him there. Ee MAJOR E. L. PAINE. ANNALS OF 1854. 148 CHAPTER IV. 1854-5. N the thirtieth day of August, 1854, Bishop Morris called our Conference to order, in Janesville, for its seventh annual session. It will be remembered that he or- ganized it, and presided at its first session in 1848. But the present Conference was almost new to him. It had, during the six years, far more than doubled in the number both of preachers and pastoral charges. W. H. Sampson was elected secretary, and J. C. Dana assistant. The business of the Conference proceeded with usual harmony and dispatch. Considerable new interest was awakened in the educa- tional field, and, indeed, in our temperance and anti-slav- ery work as well. The Northwestern University had been projected a few years before, and our Conference had been solicited to ap- point some trustees and visitors, to meet the requirements of the charter, and thus enable its friends to organize and proceed to work at once. Failing to comply with their request would compel them to wait until their charter could be changed by the next Legislature of Illinois. Of course we cheerfully granted their request. But now they ap- pear, by a representative, at this Conference, and ask the patronage of the southern portion of our Conference ter- ritory. This was not contemplated in the former action of our Conference. Dr. Hinman, the president elect of that ‘institution, urged the case strongly; and Dr. Cook (as he can now be designated, having recently been hon- 144 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ored with the doctorate) as vigorously opposed it. With great unanimity, the Conference refused to accede to their proposal. It expressed the utmost good-will toward their enterprise; but as we were engaged in a similar one, with far less favorable prospects, we could not consent to allow them to send an agent into our territory to canvass for funds or students. It hardly seemed generous for them to ask it; it was eminently just for us to refuse. Indeed, if ‘‘ cheeky ” had been invented before that occur- rence, some one might have hastily used it in this case. The Conference appointed no more trustees or visitors to that institution. Measures had been taken to found an institution at Red Wing, Minnesota, with encouraging prospects, to be called Hamline University. Bishop Hamline had already donated to it $25,000. That point was then within our boundaries, but it was not expected to remain so long. It seemed an eligible site for such an institution. It was on the ‘‘ Father of Waters,” and that vast region was fast filling up with enterprising people. The Conference gave it a hearty indorsement. The subsequent development of the country in ‘‘regions beyond” seemed to demand its removal to Minneapolis—that city of marvelous growth— where for several years it has been in successful operation. A communication came to us from Ohio setting forth the importance of a college for colored people, to which the Conference responded very cordially. Of course the interests of Lawrence University were kept in view. The college-building was nearly completed, the collegiate department organized. N. E. Cobleigh, A. M., and R. Z. Mason, A. M., had been elected to fill different chairs. H. A. Jones, A. M., was elected tutor. All these were well recommended for their places. The prospects of the institution were still very flattering. Pro- fessor R. O. Kellogg, who had been connected with it ANNALS OF 1854. 145 almost from the first, resigned, and retired from its halls. This was unfortunate to human view. No man was ever connected with the institution in its entire history, before or since, who exerted a more salutary influence over the students than he. Since our last session the people had expressed at the polls their desire for a prohibitory liquor-law, by a major- ity of about four thousand. The Legislature obeyed their will, and enacted one essentially the same as the famous ‘*Maine Law.” W. A. Barstow, the governor, vetoed it, and thus thwarted the will of a large majority of the peo- ple. Four thousand then were probably equivalent to ten thousand now. This case illustrates the wisdom of our action at the last Conference in pledging ourselves not to vote for any one who should fail to give entire satisfaction that he would, if elected, ‘‘ both vote and labor for a prohibitory enactment.” Mr. Barstow was publicly interrogated on the subject before the election, and responded in a way that led his political friends who favored the temperance cause to believe he would give his official sanction to such an act if approved by the people at the polls. But his answer was that of a wily politician—ambiquous. Of course the liquor men were satisfied with it; they knew what it meant. True to his artfully-concealed intention, when the bill was presented for his signature he killed it in one short sen- tence—‘‘ It is unconstitutional ”—without assigning a soli- tary reason. ; O, when will temperance men learn not to trust a man that occupies an equivocal position on this great question ! Especially, when will they break away from all political parties that are wedded to and controlled by the liquor- power? Notwithstanding this defeat, the Conference showed a determination to push the battle till victory for the right 12 146 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. should be achieved. This was evinced in a short but strong report, unanimously adopted, as follows: “The Committee to whom was referred the subject of Tem- perance, respectfully present the following report: ‘That the moral -and political position of the Wisconsin Annual Conference having been clearly defined from time to time, is so well understood that your Committee deem it su- perfluous to consume time by any reference to the past. “We therefore submit, for the consideration of the Con- ference, the following resolutions : “Ist. That from the observations of the past year, we are confirmed in the conviction that the only effectual remedy against this gigantic evil, is the enactment and enforcement of a most stringent Prohibitory Liquor Law. “2d. That in order to secure this desirable object, we mutu- ally pledge ourselves to vote for such men only as are avow- edly and openly in favor of the passage of such law; and that by preaching or lecturing, and by all other prudent means, we will endeavor to secure the co-operation of all the people within our respective fields of labor. “3d. That the expressed will of a majority of more than four thousand voters on November last, and the correspond- ing action of the popular branch of the Legislature in favor of a Prohibitory Law in this State, demand our sincere grat- itude to God, and should inspire the friends of temperance with new courage, and prompt to increased and vigorous ef- forts for the consummation. of the glorious Temperance Ref- ormation. O. F. Comrort, Chairman.” The most absorbing subject, aside from the direct work of leading souls to Christ, was that of slavery. The fail- ure of the General Conference of 1852 to put forth an ex- pression in regard to it, though urged by that well-bal- anced man—Calvin Kingsley, afterwards bishop—and others, had probably aroused many, and intensified more. Meanwhile the rising tide received additional force from the aggressive action of the slave power in securing the passage of a law in defiance of the ‘‘ Missouri Compromise” of 1819, by which slavery might be extended into the new ae ANNALS OF 1854. 147 Territories of Kansas and Nebraska, and thus place the Nation more completely under its domination. Meanwhile a discussion had been opened in our newly established paper, the Northwestern Christian Advocate, on the subject of ridding our Church from a complicity with this ‘* sum of all villainies.” Its editor, J. V. Watson, seemed for some time rather conservative, yet he freely admitted ar- ticles on both sides. Possibly his caution led to the best results. One or two Conferences had proposed substitutes for our General Rule on Slavery, but they were not satisfactory to the more progressive. From no quarter did the clarion of freedom—entire freedom of the Church from this sin and shame of the Nation, sound out in clearer notes than from within our borders. ‘‘No compromise!” was our watchword. The report of the Committee on Slavery, adopted at this session, will show the reader the position of the Con- ference at that time. It is here given entire: “The Committee on Slavery respectfully report: That while we deem any elaborate discussion of this subject super- fluous, we do believe it incumbent on this body of ministers to express clearly and unmistakably their views of its character and of their duty in regard to it. “For this purpose we propose for adoption the following resolutions: “Ist. That our opposition to slavery in all its forms was never more decided and uncompromising than at present. “2d. That we regard the Kansas and Nebraska Bill, passed by our National Legislature at its recent session, as an alarm- ing exhibition of the slave power, surpassed in atrocity only by the Fugitive-slave Law of 1850. “3d. That we deem it our duty as ministers of the gospel, to preach against slavery as against other violations of religion and humanity, and in every other proper way to labor for its removal from the Church and the world. “Ath, That we affectionately invite our people to co-operate 148 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. with us by their prayers and in the use of the elective fran- chise to effect a repeal of the Fugitive-slave Law, to prevent the further extension of slavery, and to secure its final extir- pation from the Nation. “5th. That we consider it highly improper for the Methodist Episcopal Church to extend to the Church South such saluta- tions as imply fraternal relations. “6th. That we deem it altogether inexpedient for the Meth- odist Episcopal Church to appropriate money either for the support or maintenance of missions in slave territory, except on a basis of entire freedom from slavery. “7th. That while we believe the Troy Conference resolu- tion, submitted to this Conference for concurrence, is well in- tended, we consider it inadequate to the demands of the case, and therefore we do not concur therein. “8th. That we request the next General Conference so to alter the General Rule on Slavery as to read as follows: The buy- ing, selling, or holding a human being as a slave. ‘Oth. That our secretary be instructed to forward to each of our bishops a copy of th® last resolution, to be presented to the several annual Conferences for their concurrence. Re- spectfully submitted. P. 8. Bennett, Chairman.” This new rule was presented to all the Annual Confer- ences for concurrence, but did not receive the requisite three-fourths majority. It will receive further notice in the annals of next year. In reviewing the labors of the year just passed, we see evidences of continued progress. To meet the growing demands of the work 37 were received on trial, 25 were continued on trial from the last year, and 10 were received into full connection. Nineteen new charges were developed, making in all 132, demanding the labors of 174 preachers. ‘The tctal increase of communicants was 1,716. H. J. VANEHOICK, a probationer of much promise, had gone to his heavenly home. At this Conference 1 located, 8 were discontinued at their request, 3 were returned supernumerary, and 8 super- annuated. The places left to be supplied were about the ANNALS OF 1854. 149 same as the preceding year, so the new recruits, though many, did not fill all the vacancies. The districts, as to boundaries, remained about as the year before, and all retained their former incumbents ex- cept Milwaukee, to which C. Hobart was appointed, to succeed I. M. Leihy, who had completed his full term. But the pastoral charges had continued to increase. The Norwegian Mission, in Milwaukee District, had so ex- panded as to demand six preachers. A new one had been developed in Minnesota requiring two, and another in Fond du Lac District that needed the labors of at least one— three missions aud nine missionaries. The last one named was supplied by Edward Peterson, then a student in Law- rence University, who will come more to view hereafter. A new Welsh Mission was also opened in Racine, to which Wm. R. Jones was appointed. A new church edifice was reported from Manitowoc, and six from other places noted elsewhere. On the 14th of January, 1854, the Spring Street Church edifice in Milwaukee was consumed by fire. In a directory of the Grand Avenue Church—as it is now called, to agree with the altered name of the street—is a ‘‘his- torical sketch” which, though it contains no false state- ments, can not fail to make an erroneous impression as to the disposition of this property and the reinvestment of its avails. After speaking of its destruction by fire, the sketch says: ‘‘The lot was sold, and with the proceeds the society purchased the Congregational church on the corner of Spring and Second Streets, thereby incurring a debt of $2,000.” This conveys the idea that all the proceeds were thus used, and yet that they were insufficient to pay for the property purchased. The essential facts are as follows: There was a debt on the original church of about five thousand dollars. The society commenced to rebuild some- what after the plan of that edifice; i. ¢., with stores on the 150 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ground-floor, and the auditorium over them. This work was going on when the writer of these pages was appointed to the pastorate of that Church in September, 1854. The hall in which the society had worshiped since their disaster seemed to him so unlike a sanctuary that he in- duced the trustees to seek a more suitable place. Fortu- nately they obtained the use of the ‘‘ Free Congregational church,” whose location has already been described. We were tenants at will, as the society owning it were unde- cided as to just what they would do in the future. They had no minister then. Soon our people became attached to the house. It was a plain but neat brick edifice, that would seat about as many as the old church. It was lighted with gas, and the acoustic properties of the auditorium were very fine. It soon became apparent that the property was for sale, and the pastor employed what skill he had to induce the trustees to purchase it. Meanwhile they had an offer for the old church property of $15,000. There was not the utmost harmony among the trustees. Some were in favor of selling the property and uniting with Jackson Street society, and building a very large church. Others claimed that as that society was an organ- ized body, and as independent of the Spring Street society as any in the Conference, they had no claim to its funds. This was strictly true. Yet as some of the trustees desired to join the Jackson Street society, who were contemplating the erection of a new church, they insisted that a part of the fund, at least, should go for that purpose. They were the majority, and some of them very intent on their plan. It was finally decided to give the Jackson Street brethren $4,000, and apply the rest, after paying the indebtedness, to the purchase of the Free Congregational church. The pastor had never been in so difficult a position, but he has reason to believe that he had some influence in harmonizing the discordant elements. ANNALS OF 1854. 151 The arrangement was carried into effect, and the church was purchased for $7,200. After using all that fell to the Spring Street Church by the agreement, and making necessary repairs, a debt remained, as stated in the “ sketch,” of $2,000. But the lot was 65 feet on Spring Street and 120 on Second Street. Soon 20 feet on Spring Street were sold for $2,000; this left us 45 feet front by 120 in depth, with a church property worth nearly as much to us as our interest in the old one before the fire. This building was burned on the 4th of July, 1861. A new one was erected on its site at a cost of $9,500, and sold in 1869 for $20,000. Thus the lot itself (65x120 feet) brought $5,300 more than the entire property cost, includ- ing the last named edifice. Now, if every brick were re- moved, the site probably could not be purchased for less than $100,000. The writer’s only apology for being thus minute is that no one who has attempted to write a history of Method- ism in Milwaukee has given an account of these transac- tions and simple justice requires that the facts should be stated. It is due the Jackson Street brethren to say that not one of them, so far as is known, exerted any influence to secure the $4,000; but they accepted it, and used it to aid them in building what is now Summerfield Church. And it is noticeable that not one of these trustees went into that new enterprise. One moved from the city; one became so mixed up with worldly follies that he withdrew from the Church ; one united his religious interests with another de- nomination, and one—Leverett S. Kellogg—‘ an Israelite indeed, in whom was no guile”—was called to a better temple than earth can furnish. His (carpenter) shop had been the public sanctuary of the struggling society. He afterwards built the first and second church edifices already 152 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. noticed. He lived honored by all, and died in the autumn of 1854, lamented by all. 1855. The Wisconsin Conference convened on the thirtieth day of August, 1855, in Racine, for its eighth annual ses- sion. Bishop Edmund 8. Janes was its presiding officer, and the secretaries of last year—W. H. Sampson and J.C. Dana—were re-elected. It will be remembered that this bishop presided at our second session, which was a long and tedious one. He was then in feeble health. Now he is more robust, though worn with excessive labor during the summer. It is rather a noticeable coincidence that Bishop Morris presided at our first and seventh sessions, and Bishop Janes at our second and eighth—the latter immediately following the former in both instances. In the main, the Conference dispatched its usual busi- ness quite rapidly. One new departure marked its pro- ceedings, which caused some delay. For some time there had been dissatisfaction as to the distribution of our mis- sionary funds. The presiding elders were always the com- mittee to make appropriations, and their reports were subject to but one modification by the Conference, viz., striking a proposed mission from the list. It was thought by many that the Conference ought to have more control over this matter. For this purpose the Conference ap- pointed a Committee on Missions, consisting of one from each district, leaving out the presiding elders entirely. This experiment proved to be impracticable, as the latter had to furnish the committee information as the basis of intelligent action. Had the two been united, 7. e., had the committee been composed of the presiding elders and one from each district, it might have been a success. Our missionary funds should be very judiciously ap- ANNALS OF 1855. 153 propriated, and it seems eminently proper for the presiding elders to be assisted by the counsel of others as competent to judge as themselves. If no better results are reached, better satisfaction will probably be given to all concerneu. The reports of committees this year, and the discussions on them, were of more than ordinary interest. They may now be briefly considered. The report on Education opens a wide field of action in this line of work, and presents a very encouraging view. 7 Arrangements having been made by the Joint Board, in August, 1854, for the organization of the collegiate de- partment of Lawrence University, freshman and sopho- more classes were formed at the beginning of the fall term. Hence the college proper, as well as the preparatory de- partment, had been in operation for a year. The latter, be it remembered, was opened on the 12th of November, 1849. The average attendance during the year just closed was a little over two hundred. This was remarka- ble, considering the poor facilities of travel in those days. A donation of $10,000 from the estate of Samuel Apple- ton, of Boston, had been made as a permanent endowment fund for a library, the interest only to be used. This has ‘been an immense benefit to the institution, and its career of usefulness will go on perpetually. The Board had taken steps for the endowment of a chair in Hebrew and Biblical Literature, which the Conference heartily indorsed. But the rapid development of the Garrett Biblical Institute, and our lack of funds, rendered it unwise to push this measure, and it was afterwards abandoned. The preparatory department of Hamline University, at Red Wing, Minnesota, had been opened with very flat- tering prospects; and the Conference showed its continued good-will towards it by favoring the appointment of prin- cipal, agent, and trustees, as desired. 18 154 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Two other institutions of learning of lower grade sought and received the indorsement of the Confer- ence. These were the ‘‘ Evansville Seminary” and the ‘Mineral Point Seminary,” at the places indicated by their names. The former will come to view again. The temperance question was, as now, pushing to the front, and our Conference took advancing positions against the rum-power throughout the contest.. Every time the sober people had trusted demagogues, they had been ‘“ sold.” It may be well now, after more than thirty years of expe- "rience, to note the position of the Conference, and the na- ture of the fight then, that we may compare both with those of the present. The report, which was unanimously adopted, after re- hearsing some achievements of moral suasion in various forms, takes advanced ground thus: ‘‘But such is the weakness and depravity of human nature, that no measures have been found adequate to suppress the great evil of in- temperance so long as the traffic in intoxicating drinks is permitted to continue in our midst.” In this fact the re- port finds the necessity of a probibitory liquor law, and then adds: ‘‘ No sooner have the friends of temperance asked for a law prohibiting entirely the sale of intoxicating drinks, and making such sale, like every other moral nui- sance, a misdemeanor, than they are charged with having made this a political question. This issue having been forced upon us, as in duty bound, we accept it; and in the name of our God we set up our banners in a great moral contest with the artifice and avarice of designing and wicked men, who love the gain of ungodliness, and are contributing their influence, their efforts, and their money to corrupt our legislation, to purchase vetoes of the Maine Law, and to reward craven-hearted lawyers and jurists, who vainly hope to acquire or retrieve a reputation for legal lore by declaring prohibitory laws unconstitutional.” ANNALS OF 1855 155 A. series of resolutions follows, the first of which is: ‘That, as a body of Christian ministers, we do hereby renew our sacred pledge, and republish to the world our solemn declaration, that whatever may be the other quali- fications of candidates, no man shall have our suffrages for any legislative, executive, or judicial office in the gift of the sovereign people, who is not known to be openly consistently, and antecedently in favor of a prohibitory liquor law.” Here is no uncertain sound. The Conference did not shrink from political action, and it had learned that pledges of politicians, not ‘‘ antecedently in favor of a pro- hibitory liquor law,” were not to be deemed of any value. Nothing has been more clearly demonstrated by history since then. How, then, can any conscientious prohibitionist give his vote for such a man? The greatest interest centered in the slavery question. The convictions of the preachers and people respecting this monster sin, and the absolute importance of extirpating it from the Nation, and especially from the Church, had _ be- come greatly intensified by the general agitation of the subject. And as this was the time for electing delegates to the General Conference of 1856, petitions came up from the laity, entreating us to select such men ‘as delegates as will give their undivided influence in favor of a rule or such legislation that shall fix a time, not far distant, when slavery in the Methodist Episcopal Church shall forever cease.” These were referred to the Committee on Slavery, already appointed, consisting of P. S. Bennett, S. L. Brown, I. M. Stagg, J. B. Mills, and J. L. Williams. Their re- port, too lengthy for insertion here, was fully up in tone to any previous one on this subject. As to these petitions, it said: ‘‘ The object contemplated in these memorials we most heartily approve, and we doubt not a decided majority of this body take the same view of the matter. There may, however, be a diversity of opinion, as to the manner 156 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. of securing this object. We have already heard the sug- gestion, ‘Let us instruct our delegates to carry out our views.’ This might suffice on questions of mere policy or propriety ; but where conscience is concerned, and where matters of such moment as cluster around the slavery question are pending, merely instructing our delegates is altogether inadequate to the end. Nor does your Com- mittee believe that pledges made, even by good men, in view of an election, are alone sufficient. In fine, we know of no other way of securing the object desired in the memorials, than by selecting men as delegates who are known to be in favor of such a rule as is men- tioned, and who are known by their votes to have been in favor of it while as yet the issue of the battle over it in this Conference hung in doubt.” This was ap- proved by all the committee but one. He had re- cently come to us from a Conference in a more southern latitude. The entire report was adopted by the Confer- ence with a gusto, not more than three or four voting ad- versely. Thus the opposition had been growing “‘ beautifully less” in every contest. Immediately after this action the fol- lowing named persons were elected delegates to the General Conference: Philo 8. Bennett, Isaac M. Leihy, Edward Cook, Elmore Yocum, and Chauncey Hobart. At that time our Church Extension Society, that is accom- plishing so much everywhere, had not come into existence. But the brethren in and about Chicago, with their usual foresight and zeal, had formed the ‘‘ Northwestern Church Extension Society,” the object of which was to encourage and aid in the multiplication of church edifices and par- sonages in the vast region known as the Northwest. This enterprise was brought to the notice of the Conference, and met a favorable response by the formation of a society auxiliary thereto, with president, vice-president, secretary, ANNALS OF 1856, 157 treasurer, and twenty directors. One-half of the latter were laymen. The Conference recommended activity in taking collections, soliciting donations, and procuring lots in eligible places for the intended purpose. Our Conference territory had now become very large, and the hitherto unoccupied portions of it were rapidly coming under pastoral care. The number of preachers also had greatly increased. At this session 31 were re- ceived on trial, 3 were added by re-admission, and 6 by transfer from other conferences, making an increase of 41 to our ministerial force. The list of appointments shows 176 pastoral charges, 37 of which were developed during the preceding year. To these 169 were appointed by the Conference, and 36 more were needed to fill vacancies or places ‘to be sup- plied.” In addition to these, 5 were appointed to our lit- erary institutions and to the agency of the Tract Society. J. W. Waterbury was transferred to Rock River Con- ference. S, Stein had died, but no obituary appears in the Minutes. Among the new charges that have risen to importance, are Neenah, Ripon, and Evansville. As early as 1839, Boyd Phelps, then a local preacher, preached the first sermon in Evansville. In 1840 the first class was formed there, probably by Jas. Ash, in charge of Monroe Circuit, then included in Platteville District. It continued as a subordinate appointment until 1855. During the Conference year 1842-3 a place of worship was furnished by the erection of a log-building, designed both for church and school purposes. It was that year included in Madison Mission. In 1847 the first Church proper was erected. The list of appointments appears quite formidable. There were 14 districts—6 more than the preceding year. 158 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. There were ten new presiding elders appointed to these, viz.: To Milwaukee, P. S. Bennett; to Racine, E. 8. Grumley; to Janesville, J. W. Wood; to Beaver Dam, J. M. Walker; to Appleton, E. Yocum; to Portage City, R. W. Barnes; to Platteville, E. C. Jones; to La Crosse, R. R. Wood; to Winona, N. Hobart; to Red Wing, J. Kerns. The other districts were manned as last year, ex- cept that Minnesota, of which D. Brooks was in charge, became three—Winona, Red Wing, and St. Paul, the old incumbent being on the latter. Beaver Dam District covered nearly the same territory as Fox River of the previous year, now dropped from the list of appointments. The reports of the year just closed show 11,999 mem- bers, 2,371 probationers, 297 local preachers; these added to the 175 effective preachers and 13 superannuates, make a total of 14,855—an increase of 1,546. Twenty-one churches and 13 parsonages had been built during the year, and decided advance made in the beney- olences and Sunday-school work. On the whole, this was one of our most prosperous years. In view of our extending territory and increasing num- bers, it was deemed advisable to divide the Conference. After a full canvass of the subject, it was decided to ask the General Conference to constitute three from the terri- tory we then occupied, to be called respectively Wisconsin, West Wisconsin, and Minnesota. This was done, the boundaries being much as at present, except that the latter took a small portion of the northwest part of our State. It was also arranged that Wisconsin Conference should meet at Appleton, West Wisconsin at Madison, and Min- nesota at Red Wing. The fate of the ‘‘new rule,” proposed at our last ses- sion, should be noted. Having failed to receive the requisite three-fourths majority of all the members of the Annual ANNALS OF 18565, 159 Conferences, it did not go to the next General Conference with a constitutional demand to be heard. Yet it was there. The slavery question was then the all-absorbing one before the American people, as the temperance ques- tion is to-day. And our Church was thoroughly awake to it. A ‘Committee on Slavery” was appointed, consisting of one from each Annual Conference, to which all papers relating to the subject were referred. The writer was the member from Wisconsin Conference. No less than three other Conferences—Troy, Erie, and North Ohio—had each proposed a new rule on slavery, which went the round of Conferences; but the ‘‘ Wisconsin Rule,” as it was called, received the most favor from the progressive anti-slavery men. In fact, no other one was considered in the com- mittee. This was gratifying to the writer, not only on account of paternal regard, but especially because he deemed it just what was demanded by the nature of the case. It was brief, comprehensive, and had the needed grip. So he guarded it to the best of his ability. But it failed of a majority, even in the committee. Still the cause did not meet a Waterloo or an Appo- mattox. Like Banquo’s ghost, it would not down. But it was evident that no very radical measure could be carried through the General Conference, and equally evi- dent that two adverse reports would be made to that body by the committee. A sub-committee was therefore ap- pointed, consisting of Wm. Hosmer, Calvin Kingsley (aft- erwards elected bishop), Asbury Lowrey, Daniel Wise, and Philo 8S. Bennett, to prepare a chapter on slavery, to take the place of the one then in the Discipline. This was done, and the proposed chapter formed a part of the minority report, which was written by the chairman, Dr. Miner Raymond. The report was a very strong one, and pro- duced a profound impression. The subject was thoroughly discussed, and anti-slavery sentiment was doubtless greatly 160 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. increased thereby, but the proposed chapter was not adopted. No one, however, knowing the facts, could fail to see that the cause was ‘‘ marching on.” In the General Conference of 1836—twenty years before—there were fourteen Aboli- tionists. Two of the number attended an anti-slavery meeting one evening, and were, by a formal vote of the General Conference, censured for thus bringing disgrace upon the body. Now the subject was freely discussed in open Conference day after day, with nearly equal forces arrayed on either side. And even a public political anti- slavery meeting was attended by scores of the members, and no thought of censure was entertained. The writer is aware that he has traveled outside the scope of this history in giving some of the above facts, but he thought the reader would desire this amount of in- formation on the general subject. ANNALS OF 1856, 161 CHAPTER V. 1856-7. HE Ninth Session of our Conference was held in Ap- pleton, commencing on the seventeenth day of Sep- tember, 1856. Many of the preachers had never seen this young and promising town, and they were delighted, both with the appearance of the college and with the majestic Fox, one of the grandest rivers in the Northwest. The immense water-power was thought by some of them to insure a city of large proportions in the near future. The beginning of our work here has already been chronicled. In 1850 it became the head of a circuit, em- * bracing what is now Neenah and Menasha. It soon de- manded, and received, the entire labors of a minister. In 1854 the first church edifice was reported. It was a frame building 40x60, with a basement above ground, and a gal- lery at each side and one end, which greatly increased its seating capacity. Bishop Simpson, elected to the episcopacy in 1852, presided at this Conference. He will be characterized hereafter. W. H. Sampson was re-elected secretary, and J. C. Dana and Geo. Fellows assistants. The ordinary routine of business passed on with usual dispatch. Some new interests were brought to the view of the Conference, which were promptly considered. Among these were the Wilberforce University, in 162 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Ohio, and the Evansville Seminary within our borders. The former was designed for the benefit of the African race especially, and was just struggling into existence. It seemed very proper that an institution for such a purpose should bear the name of the distinguished Christian statesman whose efforts were so effective in the abolition of African slavery in the British West Indies. But this was of com- paratively small account. The intrinsic character of the en- terprise commended itself to every true philanthropist, and the Conference heartily commended it, and pledged co- operation with other Conferences in its establishment. The other institution also received a cordial indorsement, and five visitors were appointed to aid the trustees in their new undertaking. Lawrence University was still very promising, and prosperous in everything except in finances. Said the Committee on Education: ‘‘It has now fully organized the four regular college classes, with a course of study prescribed in its catalogue equal in extent and variety to that of any college in the Eastern States.” It was doing its work in three departments—preparatory, academic, and collegiate—with a large patronage of students. But its exchequer was very meager. The plan of raising fifty thousand dollars by the sale of perpetual scholarships at fifty dollars each, had not met expectation. The requisite number had been sold, but as the purchasers had considerable time on them, many were never paid for. On some, one or two payments only were made. On the whole there was a failure of many thousand dollars. The causes for this were various. The process of selling ex- tended through a period of several years, such was the poverty of the sparsely-populated country. Then only one- third of the price was due, leaving one and two years for the other payments. During these five or six years some had died, some had removed from the country, some had ANNALS OF 1856. 163 experienced reverses of fortune, and some, perhaps, who supposed they could sell at a great advance, when they found they could not, refused to pay up, Those who sent their children at once, or intended to soon, of course paid for their scholarships; so did some others. This brought a large number of students, but very little money to pay expenses, as only the interest on the scholarships sold was available. Thus the trustees became very much embar- rassed, and, but for the self-sacrificing spirit of the profes- sors, the college could not have long survived. The Committee on Education looked the difficulty di- rectly in the face, and frankly informed the Conference of the facts. There were some hopeful signs. Citizens of Appleton had pledged ten thousand dollars to increase the endow- ment, on condition that twenty thousand dollars should be raised from other sources. Then there were several stu- dents in the college classes who intended to enter the min- istry. This was an additional incentive to action. So, with unflagging courage, the heroic band went on. As usual the slavery question was prominent. A com- mittee, consisting of H. Requa, P. B. Pease, and O. E. Hall, was appointed on the subject. Following a well- written preamble are seven resolutions, four of which are here given: ‘* Resolved, That while we deeply regret the failure of our last General Conference to effect a change in our General Rule on Slavery, we record with gratitude the fact that a large majority declared in favor of the highest measure ever proposed by an Annual Conference on that subject. “* Resolved, That we highly approve of the provision made by the last General Conference for the publication of anti- slavery literature by our Book Concern, and confidently look forward to the day when slavery shall be treated in all our publications like intemperance or any other sin. 164 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ‘ Resolved, That in accepting the ministerial office we have never relinquished our rights, as citizens or as Chris- tians, to speak our sentiments, to vote our principles, and to pray for the universal triumph of the principles of the gospel of Christ; and, by the grace of God, we never will. ‘* Resolved, That we deeply sympathize with the suffer- ing freemen of Kansas, and that we will ever pray and vote for the complete triumph of the glorious cause of liberty.” : Young readers will probably see, as older ones will call to mind, that Abolitionists then met the same influences that Prohibitionists do now. The cry, “Political preachers!” “ Keep politics out of the pulpit!” etc., then meant, “‘ You must do nothing to hurt my party.” It means the same now. But as we were not awed into silence by the slave- power then, so we will not be by the liquor-power that is now dominating this Nation. The Conference last year was much more formidable in appearance than this, as about one-half of the preachers had fallen into the newly formed Conferences. The absence of many of the older members was especially noticeable ; as, A. Brunson, W. Wilcox, C. Hobart, D. Brooks, A. Calendar, I. Searl, and M. Himebaugh. Still there re- mained ninety-two with us, including those on trial, among whom was a sufficient number of experienced men to guide matters safely. The two last named returned to our Con- ference after a few years. Of the young members who were removed by the divis- ion, one especially—John L. Dyer—reached an enviable distinction. This distinction was won, not by discoveries in science, inventions in art, or brilliant pulpit orations, but by selfsacrificing toil. After a few years he went ‘‘ West,” and became a pioneer presiding elder. His district covered all there was of Colorado and Arizona. Perhaps he could not, with Paul, speak of ‘‘perils in the city,” but he prob- ANNALS OF 1856, 165 66 ably could of ‘‘perils in the wilderness,” “‘ perils by the heathen,” and ‘“‘journeyings often.” And those journey- ings were not performed in palace cars. ‘‘ A noble son” of his became territorial judge, and was assassinated by a mob on July 3, 1875, for standing erect ‘for law and order and principle.” The old veteran still lives, respected and honored by all. One remarkable circumstance came to light in the cab- inet work of the Conference this year; viz., not one of the six presiding elders was in the cabinet the year before. This was a little embarrassing, yet we got along tolerably well. The bishop was on his first episcopal tour in this part of our great field. He was elected in 1852, and had already acquired considerable fame as a pulpit orator, though he had not reached his zenith. His sermon in College Chapel on Sabbath produced a profound impression. It was founded on Acts xx, 24. A pen-and-ink description of the magic power of the preacher, or of the effect of the sermon on his hearers, would be a vain attempt. Suffice it to say, that more were ready to be martyrs at its close than at its beginning, and some probably settled the question as to their life-work who had been vacillating. In looking over the work of the year it was seen that a decided advance had been made in all our borders. Such bad been the success of the Norwegian Mission that a sepa- rate district was created for it, containing ten appointments, the charge of which was committed to I. M. Leihy. The work had so extended among our own people that more than twenty new pastoral charges appear in the Min- utes. A few of these will be mentioned here, and for the others the reader is referred to the proper appendix. A new district was also formed in the English work, called Watertown, to which C. G. Lathrop was appointed. A. P. Allen was appointed to Fond du Lac District at 166 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. the preceding Conference; but his health failing somewhat, he resigned it, and I. M. Leihy was appointed thereto for the rest of the year. At this Conference it was put in charge of H. Requa. The incumbents of the other dis- tricts were the same as the previous year. Very little change occurred in the appointments except in name. City Mission, in Milwaukee, became Grove Street; and Wauwatosa, Brookfield. Kewaunee, a circuit almost without bounds, in Fond du Lac District, was a new pastoral charge. N. J. Aplin, in charge of Manitowoc the previous year, skirmished along its southern border, and had some romantic experiences. West Beloit, in Janesville District, was also a new charge, and its subsequent history indicates that its formation was premature. Appleton District showed the most enlarge- ment. Seven new charges appear, besides New London, in connection with Hortonville. But ‘Appleton, Second Ward,” was not a success. The statistical report would show a great lack of success were it not for the removal of so many ministers and mem- bers by the division of the Conference. The report is as follows: Members, 6,690; probationers, 1,366; local preach- ers, 158; effective preachers in Conference 105; superan- nuated preachers, 11; total, 8,330; pastoral charges, 109; places to be supplied, 13. Eighteen preachers were received on trial, and one re- admitted—C. S. Macreading. Eleven were transferred to other Conferences. C. Willerup, the father of the Norwegian Mission work in the Northwest, deserves special mention. He was not transferred, but appointed a missionary to Norway, remain- ‘ng a member of our Conference. This was the beginning f our work in that land, and now for years we have had an Annual Conference theze, Mr. Willerup will receive further attention in due time. ANNALS OF 1857. 167 1857. This year the Conference met in Milwaukee, in Spring Street Church, commencing on the 20th of August, Bishop R. E. Ames presiding. W.H. Sampson was again elected secretary, with S. W. Ford and Geo. Fellows, assistants. This was the second time Mr. Sampson had thus served the Conference. Bishop Ames presided over us five years before, at our session in Fond du Lac, it being his first Conference after he was elected to the episcopacy. In the proper place some of his prominent characteristics will be noted. Though this was the tenth session of our Conference, it had never convened in the metropolis of the State.* It is believed that the Churches in the city and the members of the Conference were mutually profited by their intercourse. The session of an Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church ought to be a benediction to any place. Small towns may appreciate such occasions more than large ones, but the latter are often quite as much in need of their savory influence. Milwaukee has shown its appre- ciation by receiving the Conference in annual session four times since then. Among the standing committees of this year was one on ‘‘ Lay Delegation.” Previous to this time laymen had never been admitted to seats in our Conference. Of course they had been welcomed as spectators, and encouraged to thus attend. But many felt that this did not meet the spirit of the age nor the demands of the case. A commit- tee was therefore ordered, who presented the following report: “WHEREAS, The finances of the Church are inseparably connected with her spiritual prosperity ; and * The Rock River Conference, which covered all this coun- try, was held there in 1844, 168 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ‘“ Wnerzas, She is principally dependent on her laity for pecuniary assistance ; and “Whereas, A voicein the management of her finances, as connected with our Annual Conferences, would, we apprehend, greatly increase the interest of our lay brethren therein; therefore, “ Resolved, 1. That we will receive a lay delegation on the subject of finance, composed of one member from each district within the bounds of our Conference, who shall be entitled to give counsel and speak on all subjects directly involving the pecuniary interests of the Church. “ Resolved, 2. They shall be elected yearly by the nomina- tion of the presiding elder and the vote of the Conference. “J. Searts, Chairman.” This was probably all that the existing law of the Church warranted the committee in doing, and the report is written with the characteristic caution of the honored brother whose name as chairman is appended. The report was adopted, and nine laymen were elected to meet with us the next year for the purpose stated. As this was a new departure, their names are here given, as follows: David Wilcox, E. A. Foot, P. Porter, 8. Mc- Laughlin, W. W. Wright, R. R. Bateman, D. Scott, John Bangs, Geo. H. Foster. A committee was appointed on another subject also, which had not before engaged our special attention, viz., “Peace,” of which C. S. Macreading was chairman. The report in a small compass set forth the Scriptural idea of war as proceeding from the perversion of manly powers, and looked forward to the day when, through the “‘ active instrumentality of Christians,” it should be no more known in the earth. Little did we think as our hands were lifted for the adoption of this report that our Nation would so soon be involved in the greatest civil war known in the history of our race. In other respects the business of the Conference went on in about the usual way. ANNALS OF 1857. 169 The report of the Committee on Education showed the university to be prospering, although, like most young in- stitutions of the kind, struggling with financial difficulties. The trustees had not abandoned the project of endowing a chair in Hebrew and Biblical literature, and had also re- solved upon an effort to add $50,000 to the Endowment Fund. To both projects the Conference gave its hearty approval. At the recent Commencement the college liad graduated its first class, consisting of four gentlemen and three ladies. It is proper to state here that our cherished institution was commenced on a plan of giving equal opportunities, every way, to both sexes. In this respect it was a pioneer. Female colleges existed before this; but few, if any, had adopted the policy of the co-education of the sexes in the same institution, and in all the departments of the col- lege curriculum. It was therefore a novel affair to see ladies constituted ‘‘ Bachelors;” but being done scientifically, none could say aught against it. Now many colleges are conducted on the co-educational plan, and the old idea that the female mind can not suc- cessfully grapple with the sterner studies—chemistry and the higher mathematics—is pretty thoroughly exploded. Our pioneer institution has contributed its share in settling this question. The action of the Conference on the temperance and the slavery questidn showed a firm adherence to the principles previously enunciated on these subjects. The report on Tobacco, written by the late P. B. Pease, was a brief but able discussion of its origin, nature, and the injurious effects of its use. It boldly declared that its habitual use in any form is wrong, and that ref- ormation should ‘‘ begin with the teachers of a pure Christianity.” The report closed with the following reso- lutions, all of which were adopted with great unanimity : 14 170 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. “1st. That we regard the practice of smoking, chewing, and snuffing tobacco, as wasteful and filthy, alike subversive of the principles of self-denial and that purity of body required by the gospel. “Od. That as ministers we will discountenance its use in any form, as an indulgence, both by precept and example. “3d. That we will not vote to receive on probation any candidate for admission to our Annual Conference who in- dulges in the use of tobacco, until the presiding elder repre- senting the case can give satisfactory evidence of a determi- nation to reform. “Ath. That we will not vote to receive into full member- ship, or to receive ordination for the traveling connection, any candidate who is in the habitual use of tobacco, until he shall first satisfy the Conference of a determination to abstain from its use; and, in order to secure this, we most respectfully re- quest the presiding bishop, in the examination of candidates, to ascertain these facts by interrogation. “Pp, B. Pease, Chairman.” So far as is known, this is the highest ground ever taken before by any Annual Conference in our connection. It attracted attention and some adverse criticism, but we steadfastly maintained our ground, and have had the pleasure of witnessing its good effects in keeping our preachers from polluting their mouths and vitiating their breaths with the poisonous weed ; and finally of seeing the principle incorporated in our Disciplinary regulations for licensing preachers and receiving them into the itinerant ministry, the world over. The changes in the appointments still indicate progress. A new district, called Steven’s Point, appears in the list, with S. L. Brown, presiding elder. A. Hamilton succeeded C. G. Lathrop on Watertown District; A. Callender, I. M. Leihy, in charge of Norwe- gian District; and J. H. Jenne, E. Yocum, on Appleton District. A few months before the Conference convened, the health of Rev. 8. C. Thomas, pastor of Jackson Street ANNALS OF 1857. 171 ‘Church, partially failed, and resigning his charge, the place was supplied by Rev. H. C. Tilton, late of the East Maine Conference. In the meantime a new church-edifice had been commenced on the corner of Van Buren and Biddle Streets, called Summerfield Church, by which name it is still known. The self-sacrificing struggles of the no- ble band of brethren there will be noticed in due time. To this charge, H. C. Tilton, having been readmitted, was appointed. The ‘Walker's Point,” ‘‘ Reed Street,” and ‘‘ Grove Street” Church of former years received another christen- ing, and has since borne the name of Asbury Church with becoming grace. The Norwegian District was vast in extent—embracing all the settlements of that nationalty in Wisconsin, and then reaching out to Chicago in the south, and to Upper Towa and St. Paul in the northwest. Fourteen peachers were received on trial this year, and five readmitted to full membership who had previously been members of Annual Conferences. At this session seven located. G. N. Hanson, having been connected with our work since 1844, had passed to the home beyond, at the age of forty-five years. For six years he had been on the retired list. He was a thoroughly consecrated man. ‘‘ His life was one of labor and usefulness; his death, triumphant and glorious.” Rev. Elmore Yocum was transferred to West Wiscon- sin Conference. This eminently devoted man deserves a more extended notice than can be given him here. In 1830 he was received on trial in the Ohio Conference, and into full connection in 1832. On the formation of the North Ohio Conference he fell into that body, and in 1849 came into our Conference by transfer, and was appointed presiding elder of Platteville District, on which he per- 172 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. formed four years of very successful work. The next two’ years he was pastor at Appleton, and the two following he was in charge of Appleton District, then extending over an immense region, to which settlers were just push- ing their way, many parts of which could be reached only with great difficulty. His faithful ‘‘ Oscar,” that had been his traveling companion for many years, bore him on his back to many a secluded settlement and lonely cabin, al- most inaccessible by any other method. He represented his Master so much that his presence was both a doxology and a benediction. He is still mentioned by the older inhabitants with expressions bordering on veneration. And. what is quite as remarkable is, that in so hard a field to traverse he visited every part of it with great punctuality, and explored much new territory, though well on towards threescore years of age. Since his transfer he has been almost incessantly in active ministerial work. Now, an octogenarian, he is awaiting the call of the Master, who doubtless will soon say, ‘‘ Well done, good and faithful servant !” Some of those who located also deserve a brief tribute. Two of them were subsequently readmitted to our Confer- ence, and therefore will not be mentioned here. The names of John Tibballs, O. E. Hall, J. C. Dana, N. Oleson, and Wm. McDonald, do not reappear in our Con- ference records. Mr. Tibballs was a noble man, earnest, devout, firm in principle, and of good ability as a preacher; but he was a victim of ill-health. He attempted the itinerancy in the North Ohio Conference, and two or three times in this; but in each case was compelled to desist on account of physical disability. When last seen by the writer he re- sided in Bloomington, Ill., ‘‘ faint, yet pursuing.” Mr. Hall did several years of good work among us, ANNALS OF 1857. 173 and then felt compelled to desist from the active ministry to care for aged parents. Mr. Dana was a rising young man, and re-entered the itinerant ranks in Minnesota Conference. Wm. McDonald bas been so long and so prominently before the world as an able preacher of Christian holiness and editor of a journal devoted to the cause as to render it unnecessary to say much in this place. Of all the able men that constituted the National Committee under whose direction so many camp-meetings have been held for the promotion of “Scripture holiness,” no one possessed a keener intellect, or could give a clearer or more con- vincing view of the subject. Of Mr. Oleson the writer has no knowledge after his location. Notwithstanding the great diminution in our numbers last year by the division of the Conference, the reports of this year show a very healthful advance. They are as follows: Members, probationers, and preachers, 9,562, be- ing an increase of 1,232. There were 131 pastoral charges, an increase of 21. 7 174 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER VI. 1858-9. HE Conference this year was held in Beloit, with Bishop Morris as president; W. G. Miller, secretary ; and 8. W. Ford and Geo. Fellows, assistants. It com- menced on the 12th of May, which was much earlier in the season than we had been accustomed to meet. For several years, both before and after this, there was considerable variation in the times of holding our sessions. Previous to this year they varied from June 25th to Sep- tember 17th. Their subsequent variations will be noted hereafter. The main argument for an early session was that every man might reap the fruits of his own garden, and strangely enough it prevailed. The reader will remember that on the 12th of July, 1848, Bishop Morris organized the Wisconsin Conference, and presided during the session. In this interim Time’s fingers had wrought some change, both on the robust frame of the bishop and on the personnel of the Conference. Very few were at this session that received appointments ten years before. This was due in large measure to the divis- ion of the Conference already described. Eight years before, the Conference had held a session in Beloit, and the people were so delighted with it that some of them expressed a strong desire for it the next year. And surely this should not be an exception. A convoca- tion of fifty or a hundred ministers of the gospel in any place for a week ought to be a ‘‘savor of life unto life,” and thus awaken a desire for its recurrence. ANNALS OF 1858. 175 The business of the Conference proceeded with the usual dispatch of those days. If anything was done out of the ordinary course deserving of special mention, it was the appointment of a ‘Committee on Historical Records.” This consisted of H. W. Frink, P. 8. Bennett, and David Lewis. Had that committee been fully awake to the importance of the matter, they doubtless would have saved much to enrich these pages that is now beyond re- covery. But it is difficult for those that are making his- tory, or who are familiar with recent events, to realize their . value in coming years. Now, after thirty years, we are searching and searching for some things that were then well known, and, perhaps, appeared too trivial to record. May the readers of these pages act more wisely ! The reports adopted showed no special change from former years. The resolutions of the previous year on the use of to- bacco were reaffirmed. The first resolution of the report on Slavery affirmed, as the sense of the Conference, ‘‘that all voluntary slave- holders who are received and remain among us, obtain and retain their membership in violation of the spirit and letter of the Discipline of the Church.” Another demands sub- stantially the change in our General Rule that the Con- ference had been insisting upon for years, while another spe- cifically commends the editors of the Quarterly Review and the Sundayj-school Advocate (Doctors Whedon and Wise) for their bold utterances against slavery. The report on Sunday-schools closes thus : “Resolved, 4. That we, asa Conference, highly approve of the man-like, Christian-like, and Wise-like course of our editor of the Sunday-school Advocate, and that his refusing to bow down or obey the dictation of the slave-power gives his paper a larger and warmer place in our affection; and 176 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. this affection should be manifest by our increased efforts for its enlarged circulation.” That the reader may fully understand this, it should be stated that considerable anti-slavery matter had appeared in the Sunday-school Advocate previous to the General Con- ference of 1856, and that a strong but ineffectual effort was made by those opposed to this to defeat his re-election at that time. All who are acquainted with Rev. J. An- derson, the chairman of the committee, will see that the above resolution is quite characteristic. In accordance with the Conference action already re- corded, laymen were this year allowed to take a part in some of our business matters. The general question of lay delega- tion had not yet been agitated very much. Of course the affairs of the university were duly con- sidered. The report of the Committee on Education showed its liabilities to be $17,686, and its assets of all kinds $144,531. But succeeding years proved a great falling off in the latter, while the former held on with a very tena- cious grip. It was also shown that the Evansville Seminary had made a promising beginning, and the Conference gave it the sanction of appointing visitors thereto. The labors of the year had developed fifteen new pas- toral charges; but as the Norwegian District was disbanded, and the appointments distributed among the Conferences within whose boundary-lines they were located, this increase is not apparent in our Minutes. Really but thiee of these were in our Conference territory. The others were within the Rock River, West Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota Conference limits. Some of these new charges have as- sumed positions of considerable importance, notably Sharon, Clinton, Shopiere, and Vinland. : All the districts, except the one just mentioned, re- mained substantially the same as last year, and the only ANNALS OF 1858, 177 change in the incumbents was that Jos. Anderson was ap- pointed to Fond du Lac District, in place of Henry Requa, who retired temporarily from the active work. The ‘‘ Disciplinary Questions” and answers present an unusual appearance. They show 21 received on trial, 1 located, 1 withdrawn from the connection, 1 expelled, and 11 transferred to other Conferences. The new recruits will come to view more or less in future pages, some very prominently. C. 8. Macreading, who retired to the local ranks, had been in the itinerancy in New England for more than a quarter of a century. In the spring or summer of 1856 he located, came to Wisconsin, and was employed as a sup- ply in Spring Street Church, Milwaukee, until the ensuing session of our Conference, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Milton Rowley, who had also been a supply there during the former part of the year. Mr. Macreading was readmitted to our Conference in 1856, and was continued in the pastorate of that Church for two more years, at the expiration of which he located. A few months after, he withdrew from the Church with which he had long been identified, and joined the Presby- terian Church, being admitted thereto as a minister of the gospel on his certificate of location. For some time a dissatisfaction with our itinerant sys- tem had been growing upon him. He finally concluded that, after ‘‘ allowing others to look up his appointments for twenty-seven years, he was capable of doing that work himself.” A few weeks of trial in the new work of ‘“can- didating,” impressed him with the fact that ministers of other Churches can not select their fields of labor at will. He soon saw his mistake, returned to the Church of his early choice, and was employed as a supply at Belvidere, Il, where, before the year closed, he was called to his reward. Mr. Macreading was an able preacher, a frank, noble, 18 178 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. generous man; but these good qualities were discounted -by strong impulses, which fact explains the unwise step described. He frankly admitted his error, and accused himself more severely than his brethren did. J. W. Donaldson was admitted on trial in 1854, had been ordinarily successful, and now deemed it best for him to enter the Congregational ministry. For this pur- pose he withdrew from the Methodist Episcopal Church. Wm. Stevens, who had been a few years in the Con- ference, closed his career among us quite dishonorably. Of the eleven who were transferred to other Confer- ences, seven were in the Norwegian work, and no special account of them can here be given. John Nolan took his place among us in 1850, acquit- ted himself well in several appointments, had been on the list of, superannuates for two years, and now, having re- cuperated, came into the effective ranks, was transferred to West Wisconsin Conference, and appointed to the charge of Mineral Point Seminary. He had served the Church in that place as pastor for two years, and his re- turn in this new relation indicated the esteem in which he was held. J. C. Aspinwall was a veteran. For many years he was an itinerant minister of considerable mark in New England, and two-years in Wisconsin Conference, his ap- pointments being Fall River and Appleton. From the latter place he was removed, by transfer, to Madison, in West Wisconsin Conference. He did good service for years, reached a ripe old age, and passed, a few months since, to a better inheritance. J. De La Mater had been with us but a short time. The writer knew but little of him, and is not able to give his subsequent history. T. C. Golden, connected with the Conference since 1851, was transferred to the West Wisconsin Conference. ANNALS OF 1859, 179 Duriug this year a new church edifice in Milwaukee, known now as Summerfield Church, was completed, It was built by the Jackson Street Church and congregation. The contract for its erection was let February 26, 1856, and on February 3, 1857, the lecture-room was dedicated. In this the society worshiped till April 4, 1858, when the auditorium was dedicated by Dr. R. 8. Foster, now one of our bishops. It stands on the corner of Biddle and Van Buren Streets; is a brick edifice, rather imposing in size, has little architectural beauty, but is well equipped with needed rooms, and has a seating capacity of about six hundred. A good brick parsonage stands in the rear of the church, fronting on Biddle Street. The present valuation of the entire property is $32,000. It seems almost invidious to mention particular names where others did so well; but all will admit that great credit is due Mitchell Steever, Geo. H. Austin, and R. P. Elmore in pushing the enterprise to completion. The charge has been for years one of the most prominent in the Conference. 1859,—FIRST CONFERENCE. This year is memorable as the one in which our Con- ference held two sessions. The first commenced on the 20th of April, at Sheboygan Falls; the other, October 13th, at Whitewater. Of course they must be treated sepa- rately. The one at Sheboygan Falls gave a good opportunity to test the force of the garden argument, already alluded to; but really the preachers did not wait for that to de- velop its strength. There was no railway in that part of the State, and the roads were almost impassable with pri- vate conveyances. So great was the dissatisfaction that no opposition was made to a return to autumn as the time for our annual sessions. 180 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Bishop Osmon C. Baker ‘presided at the session at She- boygan Falls. He was elected to the episcopacy in 1852, and this was his first visit to our Conference. A more ex- tended account will be given of him hereafter. W. G. Miller was the principal secretary, and 8, W. Ford and Geo. Fellows, assistants. A new and a very unpleasant circumstance met us at. this Conference. J. W. Wood, presiding elder on Janes- ville District, had divorced his wife and married another woman, for other causes than the one specified by our Lord as the only ground of justification for such action. Charges had been preferred; but, with consent of par- ties, their prosecution was postponed till this session of the Annual Conference, on condition that he should cease to exercise his ministerial functions till then, which he did. The bishop called W. G. Miller, who had been pastor at Janesville for two years, to represent the district in his council. In due time Mr. Wood was put on his trial, and, after a patient hearing of the whole case, he was expelled from the ministry and membership of the Church by an almost unanimous vote. This was a very serious transaction. It was concluded at an evening session. Sadness was in every heart. The darkness without symbolized the gloom within. Mr. Wood had stood well among his brethren, was a rising, promising man; and could the Church have been vindicated, and the proper moral effect produced by sorrow on the part of the Conference, he would have been spared. But the issue was forced upon us, and we were compelled either to maintain the Scripture standard, or practically indorse the loose views so alarmingly prevalent relative to divorce and re- marriage. ANNALS OF 18659, 181 After the case was decided, the following resolutions were presented and adopted : “1, That this Conference shall deem it a high misdemeanor for its members to solemnize matrimony between parties, either of whom has a husband or wife not divorced for the cause specified by our Lord in Matthew v, 32, and xix, 9. “2. That in administration, all such marriages, as well in the laity as in the ministry, should be treated as cases of im- morality. P. S. Bennett, “8. C. THomas, “W. H. Sampson.” The writer offers no other apology for giving so much space to this affair, than the principle it involves. This was firmly maintained by the Conference against a strong current of sympathy, and equally so by the General Con- ference, to which the case was appealed. As to the business of the Conference, there was nothing remarkable. Favorable mention was made, in the report on Education, of our rising university, of Evansville Seminary, and of the Garrett Biblical Institute. Several Conferences had recommended changes in the General Rule on Slavery; and as all were in the line of progress, we deemed it best to concur in them all, but gave our decided preference to our own, viz.: ‘The buy- ing, selling, or holding a human being asa slave.” Its brevity, comprehensiveness, and unmistakable import made it, to our minds, the best of any proposed. As the intoxicating quality of lager-beer had been called in question, the Committee on Temperance consid- ered the matter, and reported that its use ‘‘as a beverage is a violation of the General Rule in our Discipline on the subject of spirituous liquors,” and this view of the case was heartily concurred in by the Conference. The general plan of the work underwent a slight change. 182 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Watertown District was dropped as such, and its charges distributed among other districts. Four presiding elders (including J. W. Wood, whose case has already been noted) finished their full terms. But as there was one district less, only three new men were appointed to fill the vacancies. These were, W. G. Miller, to Milwaukee District; C. D. Pillsbury, to Racine District; and Daniel Stanbury, to Janesville District. There were but eight new pastoral charges formed at this Conference, and the increase of effective laborers was about the same; but the reports showed a total increase in the ministry and laity of 1,269. J. M. 8S. Maxson had died during the year, and also ‘the wife of Rev. S. W. Martin. We had not previously published the dhitanites of ministers’ wives in our Minutes; but it seemed eminently proper to do so, and the custom inaugurated this year has continued to the present time. Mr. Maxson was received on trial in 1850, continued seven years in the active work at Omro, Fall River, Grove Street (Milwaukee), Oconomowoc, Rosendale, and, in May 1848, he was appointed to Ripon, where, on the nine- teenth day of the next month, he ceased almost at once to work and live, at the age of thirty-six. Mrs. Martin died on the 21st of March, 1859, after bearing ‘with Christian fortitude and cheerfulness” the burdens incident to our itinerancy for nearly twelve years. ‘(A few hours previous to her departure she appeared se- rene and joyful, and passed away, shouting ‘Glory! Glory! Glory! to her home in heaven.” 1859.—SECOND CONFERENCE. As already stated, two sessions of our Conference were held this year. The second was in Whitewater, com- mencing on the 13th of October, less by one week than six months from the first. ANNALS OF 1859, 183 It will be noticed also that this fraction of a calendar year was in a season when few special revival services are usually held. During the preceding winter many had been brought under the watch-care of the Church as pro- bationers, and the figures indicate a remarkably small number that bore the process of sifting, as there was a de- crease of 944. There was an increase in the full mem- bership of 153, thus reducing the loss to 791. Taking the two fractional years as one—which is the only fair way to do—we find an increase of members and probationers of 359. For the third time this Conference enjoyed the presi- dency of Bishop Ames. 8S. W. Ford was elected secre- tary, and Geo. Fellows and R. M. Beach, assistants. A new and needed office seems to have been created at this Conference; namely, a statistical secretaryship. It was filled by H. C. Tilton, with M. Himebaugh as as- sistant. So brief had been the Conference year that but little business had accumulated. The action relative to the benevolent and literary insti- tutions was much as at the next preceding Conference. On the absorbing subject of slavery we maintained our well-chosen position, concurred in all the proposed changes that indicated progress, and adhered tenaciously to the rule proposed to the other Conferences four years before. No one of the preachers had died; but the wife of Professor L. L. Knox had been called to her rest. She was a woman of rare endowments and culture. A daugh- ter of Rev. Elias Bowen, D. D., of Oneida Conference, she inherited much of his strong mental qualities and decision of character. She graduated from Oneida Conference Sem- inary in 1841. Soon after this she became preceptress of the Gouverneur Wesleyan Seminary, in which Rev. L. L. Knox was a professor. The last exercise of the exhibition at the 184 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. close of the year—though not printed in the program—was their union in the bands of matrimony. Her last earthly home was in Appleton, her husband being a professor in the university there. Her present home, we trust, is in one of the ‘‘ many mansions.” As the reader has noticed, the work had not expanded much in any respect during this short year. But since our session in 1855 there had been a marked increase, especially if we take into account the fact that nearly one- half our ministers and laymen were set off that year into other Conferences, as already noted. The following facts will give some idea of this expansion in the ministry. In 1855 we elected five delegates to the General Conference, to be held in May following. At that time the basis of representation was so changed as to allow but one delegate to every forty-five members of an Annual Conference in full connection. Previously the basis was one to every twenty-four—a difference of twenty-one. Yet notwithstanding this, and the division of the Confer- ence, we found ourselves entitled to the same number as in 1855. The delegates were W. G. Miller, I. M. Leihy, S. C. Thomas, Edward Cook, and P. 8. Bennett. Re- serves—H. W. Frink and H. Requa. Mr. R. P. ELMORE. ANNALS OF 1860, 185 CHAPTER VII. 1860-1. N the twenty-sixth day of September, of this year, our Conference convened in Janesville for its four- teenth annual session. For the second time Bishop Scott presided over the body, and for the second time the Con- ference was held in the enterprising city just named. For the third time 8. W. Ford was elected secretary; R. M. Beach and J. C. Dana were his assistants. M. Himebaugh was statistical secretary, with R. C. Parsons as assistant. The business of the Conference was done about as usual. Dr. Edward Cook, for the last two years pastor of Summerfield Church, Milwaukee, had been re-elected pres- ident of Lawrence University. It was the understanding, however, that he should devote the year to the financial interests of the institution, and that Professor Mason should act as president. Co-operative action was pledged to the Evansville Sem- inary and the Garrett Biblical Institute. To the latter the Conference committed itself more fully than ever before. The anti-slavery agitation had for years been forcing itself upon the public mind. It began in the Eastern States more than a quarter of a century before this period. The attention of our Church was especially called to it, about 1836, by the discussions in the General Conference held that year. Many of our ‘‘chief ministers,” honest and earnest in their zeal for the peace of the Church, 186 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. sought to smother the rising flame. It was impossible. Every such attempt led to a more thorough investigation, a better understanding of the horrible system of slavery, and of the relation of our Church to it. The subject began to be discussed every where—through the press, on the rostrum, in the pulpit—and it soon be- came evident that an ‘“‘irrepressible conflict” was upon us. It found its way into the United States Congress, and be- came a disturbing factor in National politics. A remark- able circumstance about it was that the very bodies that tried the hardest to quiet the agitation did the most to promote it. Slaveholders took offense at J. Q. Adams for his manly determination to defend the rights of all, and sought to expel him from the House of Representatives. His masterly de- fense, which occupied several days and was published in the Congressional Globe, was an earthquake shock to the Nation. The General Conference of 1836 discountenanced all agitation of the subject; yet at the very next meeting of that body, in 1840, they passed a resolution to the effect that in a Church trial a colored member should not testify against a white member. This sent a thrill of indignation far and wide, and awoke many to a realization of the growing evil that had crept into our Zion. So also in other cases that a want of space forbids to mention. Nothing intensified and crystallized anti-slavery senti- ment like the enactment of the Fugitive-slave Law of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, already noticed. A political party had already been formed to antago- nize the slave-power. It was known as the Liberty party in 1840 and 1844, as the Free-soil party in 1848, as the Free Democracy in 1852, as the Republican party in 1856, and so to the present time. ANNALS OF 1860, 187 While our General Conference of 1860 was in session in Buffalo, New York, the National Republican Conven- tion put in nomination, for President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, who was elected in the November following. If the pending election did not intensify the excitement of the General Conference on the slavery question, it surely did not allay it. A committee was appointed, con- sisting of one from each Annual Conference, as at the previous General Conference, to whom all communications relating to the subject of slavery were referred. W. G. Miller was the member from our Conference. Calvin Kingsley was chairman. He had done very effective work for the cause. At the General Conference of 1852 he contended earnestly for advanced action against a strong conservative and semi-proslavery current; and as he saw himself overpowered, he said: ‘‘I will be heard on this subject at some time.” Prophetic words! The time had now come. A strong report was presented to the General Conference on the 16th of May, by the chairman, read in a clear voice, and with modest yet commanding dignity. It was deemed best to recommend but a slight verbal change in the General Rule on Slavery, and thereby to make it express no more or less than it was believed by many that our fathers meant by its adoption. This change was to add the word ‘‘ holding,” and to substitute ‘‘ or” for “and.” It would then read: ‘The buying, selling, or holding of men, women, or children, with an intention to enslave them.” The report also recommended our present ‘Section on Slavery.” It is here reproduced, for the benefit of those who have not a copy of our Discipline : “Question—W hat shall be done for the extirpation of the evil of slavery ? “Answer—We declare that we are as much as ever con- vinced of the great evil of slavery. We believe that the buy- 188 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ing, selling, or holding of human beings, as chattels, is con- trary to the laws of God and nature, inconsistent with the Golden Rule, and with that Rule in our Discipline which re- quires all who desire to remain among us to ‘do no harm, and to avoid evil of every kind.’ We therefore affectionately ad- monish all our preachers and people to keep themselves pure from this great evil, and to seek its extirpation by all lawful and Christian means.” A minority report was also presented, opposing any change in the Discipline on the subject. Both reports lay on the table till the 23d, when the majority report was called up for action. Granville Moody, of the Cincinnati Conference, opened the discussion, which was continued by ten others for several days. Much other business was done in the meantime. On the 29th of May a vote was taken on the adoption of the proposed new General Rule, 138 voting for, and 74 against it, Thus it failed by 17 of the required two-thirds majority. The discussion continued on the adoption of the pro- posed new chapter till the 31st, when it was carried by a vote of 155 for, and 58 against it, being 48 more than the requisite majority. In the entire contest, on all the side issues as well as on the main question, our delegation was a unit, all voting for the most stringent measures pro- posed to extirpate slavery from the Church. Wisconsin Conference was also represented in the dis- cussion. The excitement was high, and it was difficult to obtain the floor. One of our delegates, however, succeeded, and spoke in favor of the majority report, under three propo- sitions, namely: I. The report clearly expresses the sentiment of the Church on the subject. II. The report indicates the very line of conduct which our border brethren have all along declared they pursue. ANNALS OF 1860, 189 III. The aggressive character of slavery demands its adoption.* At the session of our Conference now under considera- tion, the action of the General Conference on this subject was heartily approved. Though not all that we desired, it was decided progress, and, as such, very encouraging. Turning our attention to the general plan of the work, we see but little essential change. The seven dis- tricts continue about as the year before; but on four of them there are new incumbents. Daniel Stanbury, in charge, the last year, of Janesville District, had been prostrated by paralysis, and’ H. C. Tilton was appointed as his successor; I. Searls succeeded A. Hamilton on Bea- ver Dam District; M. Himebaugh, J. H. Jenne, on Ap- pleton District ; and R. 8. Hayward, 8. L. Brown, on Ste- ven’s Point District. There had been no deaths of members of the Confer- ence; but a distinguished local elder, Rev. Wm. Fox, who had rendered much valuable service as a supply and in other relations, had passed to his reward. The Confer- ence, in view of his services, made the following minute: ‘WHEREAS, Our dear and venerable brother, Rev. Wm. Fox, a local elder, who ‘helped us much in the Lord,’ has, during the past year, exchanged mortality for life; therefore, ‘‘ Resolved, That we cherish a grateful recollection of his useful and selfslenying labors in building up the cause of the Redeemer among us, and that we tender our Christian condolence to his afflicted friends.” *The reader may deem the foregoing a digression from the proper trend of this history. Perhaps it is. Yet in view of the absorbing interest then felt in the subject, and of the difficulty those who now desire to become acquainted with the facts may have to find reliable sources of information, the writer has felt justified in presenting them here. 190 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Five located at this Conference; but as two of them were afterwards readmitted, they need not he noticed here. J. H. Hazeltine was received on trial in 1852, and had acquitted himself well in the work for eight years. A. Griswold was received one year later. He was zealous and quite successful. After his location, he was em- ployed at different times as a supply. R. M. Beach came to us from an Eastern Conference in 1856. : He was a re- liable man, a fair preacher, and always commanded respect. The entire lay and ministerial force for beginning an- other year’s work was 11,828, an increase of 318. Nine new churches had been erected, and seven par- sonages. This year our conference was first represented in the missionary work in the Orient by the appointment of I. L. Hauser missionary to India. 1861. This year the Conference met the second time in Fond du Lac, and the second time Bishop Osman C. Baker took the chair as our presiding officer. The reader may have noticed a similar coincidence in the last session. S. W. Ford was elected secretary, with R. M. Beach and H. Colman as assistants, and R. C. Parsons statistical secretary. The session commenced on the 18th of September. The preceding year had been one of immense agitation, not only within our bounds, but throughout the Nation. Reference has already been made to the anti-slavery agitation and its increasing intensity. A few additional words will place the subject in a more intelligible light, before young readers especially, and better prepare them for what follows. The object of the Liberty party, organ- ANNALS OF 1861. 191 ized in 1840, was to awaken the whole country to. the enormity of slavery, and to secure, as soon as possible, the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia and in the Territories over which Congress had jurisdiction ; and also the suppression of the slave-trade between the States of the Union. These were deemed important steps to the final destruction of the system. The party retained its name and purpose in the next Presidential campaign, with the same standard-bearer. In 1848 it took the name of, the ‘‘ Free-soil Party,” with Martin Van Buren for its Presidential nominee. In 1852, John P. Hale was the candidate of the same party under a slightly changed name. Soon after this, an act was passed by Congress, in utter violation of a solemn compact made in 1819, known as the Missouri Compromise. By that compact slavery was to be forever excluded from all new States and Territories formed north of 36° 380’ north latitude. The Act referred to opened all unorganized territory to the introduction of slavery if the people so willed. This tended to awaken the Nation to the aggressive power of slavery more than the Fugitive-slave Law of 1850. The anti-slavery elements from all parties soon con- solidated into the ‘‘ Republican Party,” and John C. Fre- mont was its first candidate for President. This was in 1856. In 1860 it triumphed in the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States. _ This greatly enraged the South. It was understood there to mean the death of their cherished institution— Negro Slavery. To protect this, eleven States seceded from the Union, formed a ‘‘Southern Confederacy,” and elected Jefferson Davis their President. He was inau- gurated February 18, 1861, two weeks before the inau- guration of Abraham Lincoln. Meanwhile the Confederates were making warlike preparations, and soon commenced open hostilities. 192 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. An extra session of Congress was ordered, and seventy- five thousand troops were called for by the President, to quell the rebellious insurrection. To these, others were soon added, and the whole country was convulsed with a gigantic civil war. In these circumstances our Conference met in 1861. A committee, unknown in our former history, was now de- manded. It was called a ‘“‘ Committee on the State of the Country.” The committee, of which J. H. Jenne was chairman, presented a strong report, fully sustaining the Government, and pledging co-operation in suppressing the Rebellion, which was enthusiastically adopted. The following extract will show the spirit of the Con- ference and the reasons for their action: “J. We regard the pending war, waged by some of the States of this Union against the Federal Government, as grow- ing out of disloyalty to truth and hatred of justice, leading them to desire a larger liberty for wickedness than is allowed them in a loyal relation to the Nation. The following reasons justify this conclusion: 1. They have never been restrained by the Government, in any form or degree, from such pursuit of life, liberty, or happiness as is consistent with the rights of others. 2. They have been protected most effectually in all their lawful interests and pursuits. 3. The Government has denied them nothing which it has accorded to other citizens. 4, As compared with the Free States, they have shared in large excess the offices, honors, and pecuniary subsidies of the Gov- ernment. Relatively, they have been more supported than supporting. 5. Still further, to meet a peculiarity in their case, growing out of a great social wrong among them, the Govern- ment has discriminated in their favor by an exceptional ad- ministration, limiting and restraining the great principles of equal justice with respect to them, while the same have uni- versal application with respect to all other citizens. “Tnasmuch, then, as in the Union they have all the aids and securities they can have, or ought to have anywhere in the lawful pursuit of lawful ends; and inasmuch, also, as they have had, by courtesy and favor, both toleration and support from Government, beyond the claims of equity and natural ANNALS OF 1861. 1938 justice--and somewhat to the reproach of both—they can have no other reason for this revolt than to secure a larger liberty for unrighteousness. This rebellion, therefore, is not only against this Nation, but is treason to the entire race and to Heaven.” ‘““A war meeting” was held in the Conference-room during the session, at which several patriotic speeches were made. Enthusiasm reached a high point. One brother, who was evidently so excited that he hardly knew whether he was fighting rebels at the front, or in a ministerial gathering in Wisconsin, declared he was ‘perfectly cool.” The action of the General Conference of 1860 in rela- tion to slavery has already been described. It produced considerable agitation and dissatisfaction in the ‘‘ Border Conferences.” Some of them declared they could not carry into their administration the requirements of the new chapter. The East Baltimore Conference proposed that each Annual Conference should be empowered to make its own regulations on the subject; and to effect this, and per- haps other ends favorable to their locality, incipient steps were taken to call an extra session of the General Conference. Against all these positions our Conference took une- quivocal ground, declaring not cnly in favor of the new chapter, but also ‘that there can be administration under said chapter in all Conferences in which the Methodist Episcopal Church has a moral right to send her money and her men;” and that to grant the request of East Bal- timore Conference ‘‘ would be a shift of the responsibility, while it would roll all the guilt that might follow upon the whole Church.” Though the slavery question and its culmination in the Civil War had become the absorbing one, a new departure was proposed in our war with the liquor-traffic in the adoption of the following: “That H. C. Tilton be, and is hereby, appointed to 16 194 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. confer with the governor of the State, most respectfully requesting his excellency to appoint a committee of seven to institute a thorough temperance investigation through- out the State; the duty of this committee to be to ap- point sub-committees in every county in the State to collect facts and statistics as follows: 1. The number of liquor-shops licensed and unlicensed. 2. The number of habitual drinkers. 8. The number of families suffering from the intemperance of their connections. 4. The num- ber of cases of delirium tremens and serious accidents occa- sioned by liquor-drinking. 5. The number of deaths, murders, and other crimes caused by intemperance. 6. Such other facts as may aid in forming an estimate of this fearful wrong. The sub-committees to report the results of their investigations to the Central Committee, who will compile and publish them.” An effort to secure a committee in Congress for similar purposes has been persistently made for several years by the National Temperance Society; but, so far, the liquor- power has prevented success. It will be seen that our Conference was several years in advance on this subject. R. Z. Mason, for some years a professor in our univer- sity, appears this year as president, in place of Edward Cook, resigned. As financial agent, P. S. Bennett suc- ceeded 8. C. Thomas, who had rendered good service since 1857. Dr. Cook was president of the college from 1853 (the year the collegiate department was organized) until 1859, when he resigned, and was pastor of the Summer- field Church, Milwaukee, for the two succeeding years. It will be remembered that in this calendar year two Con- ference sessions were held. In 1860 he was again elected to the presidency of the college, but it was understood that this relation was nominal, and that Professor Mason should act as president, while he should devote his time to ANNALS OF 1861. 195 increase the endowment. His name appears in our records this year for the last time. He subsequently took charge of Claflin University, in South Carolina, and, after doing grand work there for many years, closed a long and use- ful life. The districts remained about the same as before, and there was but one change in the incumbents—T. O. Hol- lister succeeded J. Anderson on the Fond du Lac District. In an early day immigration furnished an important element of our growth. Now, and for a few previous years, the tide was turning, and emigration began to de- _ plete our ranks. The effects of the war also, in this respect, were appearing. It is not strange, therefore, that but seven were admitted on trial, or that there was a slight decrease in the laity. There was, however, a gain of four church edifices and five parsonages, with a total increase in their valuation of $8,795. On the 4th of July, 1861, the Spring Street (Milwau- kee) Church lost their house of worship by fire. This was their second calamity of that kind in the space of a little more than seven years. Undaunted, they entered upon the work of erecting another on the same lot, similar to the second one built by them, described in the annals of 18438. Our nominal war record began this year by the appoint- ment of S. L. Brown chaplain of the Seventh Regiment of Wisconsin Volunteers. Daniet StanBury, who appeared once or twice in the Conference-room at our last session, a physical wreck, had passed to his inheritance beyond the vale. He was a man of great moral worth—sincere, devout, earnest, and strongly attached to the Church of his choice. He died, honored and lamented by all who knew him, October 28, 1860, a few days after the close of our last session. 196 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Three of the preachers were bereft of their wives dur- ing the year, viz.: S. W. Ford, W. H. Sampson, and R. P. Lawton. Mrs. Forp, after a protracted and severe illness, died in Waupun, where her husband was pastor, on the 13th of January, 1861. For about fourteen years she had been her husband’s faithful companion in his work. ‘‘She was of modest, retiring habits, her piety consistent and deep. She died in great peace.” Mrs. Sampson was the daughter of Rev. Julius Field, one of our pioneer preachers. She was a person of fine literary attainments. She had been preceptress in Amenia Seminary, New York, and had also occupied other re- sponsible positions. She was amiable, modest, unassum- ing as a child. After adorning her husband’s home for a little more than seven years, she passed to a better home, August 27, 1861. Mrs. Lawron was a great sufferer for many years, es- pecially during her hushand’s ministry, and therefore could render him but little active assistance. On the 31st of July, 1861, her physical sufferings terminated in death. Samuel Watts, L. Hallock, and J. Van Voris—all good men and true—located this year. The former had been in the work since 1850. He settled in Appleton, where he lived a very exemplary life till January 28, 1889, when he was suddenly killed by a train of cars. The writer has no knowledge of the others after they located. ANNALS OF 1862, 197 CHAPTER VIII. 1862-3. HIS year the Conference met in Kenosha, where, in 1848, it held its first session. The preachers came together with unusual sadness. The war-cloud spanned the horizon, and it was very dark; faith only could discern even a silver lining. Bishop Janes, who was with us for the third time as our president, opened the Conference with a prayer that will never be forgotten. He seemed almost cruslied under the terrible outlook; yet he took such a firm hold of God, of his promises, of his attributes, that? he also seemed as- sured of the final suppression of the Rebellion. In both these all heartily sympathized. The session began on the first day of October. S. W. Ford was re-elected secretary, with H. Colman and Samuel Fallows assistants. R.C. Parsons was again elected sta- tistical secretary. An inside view does not reveal much advance in this part of the Church militant. Indeed, the Nation militant engrossed universal attention, and doubtless weakened many lines of religious work. Still, in some respects we made a little progress, and, on the whole, about held our own. Only four were received on trial in the Conference. Three, however, were readmitted from the local ranks, so our recruits were about the same as the year before. At the previous session one of our ministers had en- 198 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE tered the army—S. L. Brown—as noted already. But in course of the year H. C. Tilton accepted the chaplaincy of the Thirteenth Regiment of Wisconsin Volunteers, went into the service, was taken severely ill, resigned his com- mission, regained his health, and re-entered the regular ministerial work at this Conference. Few have so varied an experience in one year. The general plan of the work was about the same as the previous year. But two new pastoral charges were added. The districts were the same, and manned the same, except that W. H. Sampson succeeded W. G. Miller on Milwaukee, and H. C. Tilton, C. D. Pillsbury on. Ra- cine District. Two of our number—Thomas White and J. M. Snow— were removed by death. So also was the wife of Rev. Cyrus Scammon. - Mr. WHITE was received on trial in 1857, preached about two years with great promise of usefulness; then, in failing health, he removed to California, in hope of averting that fatal disease, the consumption. It was too late. He died, ‘‘triumphing in the same Savior he had so successfully preached to others,” in September, - 1861. Mr. Snow was one of our pioneer preachers, entering the work in 1838. In 1853 he became disconnected with the Conference. He was subsequently readmitted, and ‘died in great peace, in the city of Chicago, Illinois, April 80, 1862.” Mary Y. Scammon died in Kenosha, where her hus- band was at the time stationed, September 24, 1862. Since 1837 she had been an itinerant’s wife. ‘‘ Her piety was uniform and consistent, shedding a glow of sunshine on all around her. She lived a useful life, beloved by all, and died a triumphant death.” Our war record was continued by the appointment of ANNALS OF 1862. 199 two chaplains—C. D. Pillsbury to the Twenty-second, and Samuel Fallows to the Thirty-second Regiment of Wiscon- sin Volunteers. The reports showed a small increase in the member- ship, but a decrease in most of the benevolences. Such are the effects of war. It had now become apparent to many minds that either slavery or the Federal Union must be destroyed. So our Conference action on the slavery question, as last year, was merged into that on the ‘state of the country.” The report of the committee on this absorbing subject, as adopted by the Conference, was full of patriotic and loyal assurances. President Lincoln had a short time before publicly declared his intention to issue a proclamation of emancipation, as a war measure, in all States and parts of States in an attitude of rebellion at a specified date. The Conference fully indorsed this, and expressed strong ‘*faith in the ultimate triumph of human rights.” Though the country was in such a ferment of excite- ment, the Conference did not forget those interests that conserve the Nation and the world in times of peace. It planned for the cause of education on a larger scale than ever before, by providing for the formation of a Conference Educational Society. This seemed to promise well, but it failed to meet expectations. The temperance cause was not overlooked, though it was impossible to awaken the enthusiasm over it that had existed in former years. The benevolences also were cared for, notwithstanding a slight diminution in collections, The General Conference of 1860 ordered that the ques- tion of lay representation to that body should be submitted to the male members of the Church for their approval or disapproval; and also that a vote should be taken in each Annual Conference on the same question. The vote of 200 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. the laity in our territory was very small. It was re- ported thus: For lay representation, § ...... » 429 Against lay representation, . . . - 486 Majority against lay representation,.. .. 657 The Conference voted as follows: For lay representation, ...... i woes 85 Against lay representation,.. . caw, se 789. Majority against lay representation, ...... 21 1863. Waukesha was this year favored with the Conference for the second time, and Bishop Scott appeared as its president for the third time. The session began October Ist, the same as last year. S. W. Ford was elected secretary for the sixth time; this year his assistants were S. Fallows, R. M. Beach, and George Fellows. The war was still raging, but the prospect for the Na- tion’s triumph was much brighter than the year before. On the first day of January, 1863, President Lincoln issued a proclamation as commander-in-chief of naval and military forces of the United States, by which all slaves in all territory under rebellion became free. This was an event long desired by many, and it was hailed with enthu- siastic joy in all loyal circles. Some of the most discerning thought the President was altogether too tardy in his re- sort to this war measure. On the thirty-first day of August, 1861, more than a year before the President became impressed with the neces- sity of such a measure, General J. C. Fremont felt con- strained to declare all the slaves owned by those in active rebellion within his jurisdiction, ‘‘ free men.” This order was so modified by Mr. Lincoln as to be ineffectual. But ANNALS OF 1863. 201 now, after long, sad months of disaster, he awoke to a realization of the situation as seen by the equally discern- ing and less conservative Fremont. This is not the place to discuss the question as to the President’s delay in issuing the Proclamation, which will ever be regarded as a fit companion of the immortal Declaration of Independence. It is enough for us now that it came in time to save the Nation. It destroyed one of the main sources of rebel strength—the production of supplies and care for the families of those in arms. Be- sides, many of the freedmen soon became soldiers in the Union army, and did valiant service. The moral effect also of this measure throughout the loyal portions of the country was assuring. Devout people saw the hand of the Invisible in it. Nor were their con- victions mocked by succeeding events. Thenceforth nearly every important battle resulted in a Union victory. The most notable event, probably, was the capture of Vicks- burg, on the 4th of July, 1863. The report on the State of the Country, from the vigorous pen of C. D. Pillsbury, was enthusiastically adopted. Among many other good things it declared that “at such a time neutrality is treason, silence crime, and inaction unpardonable.” It gratefully indorsed the ‘ Proc- lamation” as ‘(a propitious offering to a justly offended God,” and hailed it as a “‘ harbinger of some coming proc- lamation of universal peace.” A new responsibility was rolled upon the public by the Proclamation of Emancipation. Millions of human beings, who had been cared for by their masters as they had cared for their horses and cattle, were thrown upon their own resources. They needed assistance in various ways. Especially did they need instruction in morality and re- ligion. This the Government did not propose to give, but 17 202 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Christian philanthropy flew to their relief in the formation of what was called ‘‘The Western Freedmen’s Aid So- ciety.” To this the Conference gave its indorsement, and pledged ‘‘hearty co-operation in their noble work.” The report on Sunday-schools takes a wider range than usual. It informs us that the Methodist Episcopal Church had an increase of 295,000 members; that of our Sunday- school scholars 246,000 were converted, notwithstanding 293 schools were broken up by the war; and that of the Sunday-schools in Wisconsin ‘‘ more than one-half (aside from Union schools) have been given by the Great Shep- herd into the bosom of the Methodist Episcopal Church.” While this might be considered a cause for gratitude, it also showed our relative responsibility. The Conference expressed a lively interest in our Church literature—giving preference, as ever, to the Northwestern Christian Advocate as the paper for our locality. It took decided ground against a paper called the Methodist in these words: ‘‘ This paper, originating in disappointed ambition, coupled with a desire to perpetuate slavery in the Church, has been from the first arrayed in hostility to the Christian Ad- vocate and Journal. And being sustained by a large mon- eyed monopoly, it has secured the patronage of many in influential positions, and thus curtailed the circulation of our noble official journal.” A word of explanation is demanded. ‘‘ Baltimore and the Border,” as the phrase then went, were greatly dis- pleased by the adoption of the new chapter on Slavery. And when, in addition, Dr. Edward Thomson, afterwards bishop, was elected editor of our leading paper over their favorite candidate, they showed their disloyalty by starting one in the same city with the avowed determination on the part of some, if not all, to run that paper under. This was detestable in every point of view, and especially ANNALS OF 1863, 203 so as Dr. Thomson was a very conciliatory man, and in all respects well qualified for the important position. But the real object in starting the Methodist was never made very conspicuous, as the heavens soon became lurid by the fires of the Rebellion, which made slavery more and more a subject of abhorrence to the American people. So, to give a respectable excuse for living, it took up and championed the question of lay delegation. Thus it drew many to its support. So far as is known to the writer, our Conference was the only one that, by formal action, opposed it. The plan of our work and the ministerial force employed this year presents less change than any previous one. The districts and their incumbents were the same as the last year. Only three new pastoral charges were developed, and six ministers added to the effective ranks. Yet there was an increase in communicants of 730. Two promising young preachers died during the year— J. K. SHetpon and Epwarp Peterson. The former en- tered our Conference on trial in 1857, and in due time came into full connection. In 1862 he was placed on the list of superannuates. He rapidly declined till January 5, 1863; then, in the twenty-seventh year of his age, passed to his reward. The loss of Edward Peterson was sensibly felt. He was a Norwegian, a graduate of Lawrence University, deeply pious, and very successful. His diligence and scholarship, as well as his genuine manliness, may be in- ferred from his standing in college. During his entire course he did not fall below second grade in a single study (often reached first grade), and did not receive a discredit mark. ‘This was the more remarkable, as he had a very limited knowledge of our language when he entered the institution. He was greatly needed in the rapidly grow- 204 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ing work among the Scandinavians, but in the midst of his usefulness, and with a very promising future, he closed his work, and entered into rest June 30, 1863, having labored with us nearly six years. The wives of three of our preachers also passed to their final home this year. The first in order of time was Mrs. Exizapera D. An- DERSON, wife of Rev. Joseph Anderson. She died of ty- phoid fever, in Appleton, April 28, 1863, during her bus- band’s pastorate there. For twelve years she had been an earnest worker with him in the itinerant field. Though her ‘‘disease rendered her bewildered much of the time,” none who knew her devoted life doubted her preparation for the closing hour. Mrs. Minerva 8. LAVELLE, sister of Mrs. Anderson, and wife of Rev. J. Lavelle, followed next. She had been in attendance upon her sister in her last illness, returned to her home, and died of the same disease, on the 21st of May, ‘‘ peacefully, submissively, and with the utmost as- surance of a blissful immortality.” The last demise to be recorded here, is that of Mrs. JENNIE M. Ames, wife of Rev. W. D. Ames, who departed June 13th following, in the thirtieth year of her age. She had been walking in the way to Zion for about thir- teen years, and for nearly six aided her husband in his itinerant work. H. Bannister, 8. C. Thomas, C. D. Pillsbury, and M. Himebaugh were elected delegates to the General Confer- ence, to be held in Philadelphia the following May. J. H. Jenne and W. G. Miller were elected as reserves. There was evident activity all along the lines of Chris- tian work, showing a decided increase in the membership, the benevolences, and in churches and parsonages. A very marked improvement was made during the year in Asbury Church, property. A new, ueat, brick ANNALS OF 1863. 205 house of worship was erected, and the old one converted into a commodious parsonage. Much credit is due the pastor, Rev. Geo. Fellows, in pushing the enterprise to completion. This was the third church that society had built. The first was consumed by fire in 1857. 206 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER IX. 1864-5. a HE general episcopal superintendency ” of Methodism may become somewhat special. Bishop Scott pre- sided over the Wisconsin Conference in 1860, 1863, and 1864—three times in five years. This was an unusual occurrence in the modern history of our Church. The Conference met this year in Oshkosh, on the fifth day of October, and after usual devotional exercises Samuel Fallows was elected secretary, with Wm. P. Stowe, R. M. Beach, and H. Colman, assistants. For the fourth time R. C. Parsons served as statistical secretary. The effects of the war were still everywhere apparent. From the time the rebels fired upon Fort Sumter till now, about two and a half millions of our adult male popu- lation had gone to the front in defense of our country. Many of our women had also rushed to the hospitals to care for the sick and wounded. Of course heavy drafts were thus made upon the Churches, and upon none more so than our own.* *The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church was held in May of this year, in Philadelphia. A patriotic address was adopted by that body, and sent to Presi- dent Lincoln by a special committee. Mr. Lincoln made a brief and characteristic reply, thus: ‘‘Nobly sustained as the Government is by all the Churches, I would utter nothing which might in the least appear invidious against any; yet without this it may be fairly said that the Methodist Episco- ANNALS OF 1864, 207 It is reasonable, therefore, to suppose that but little apparent progress would be made in our home-work. Still we endeavored to push every benevolent and humanitarian enterprise, as well as to labor directly to bring men to God, and build them up in righteousness. The records show that we did. Indeed, new schemes of benevolence and new developments of old ones were adopted, as the reader has already seen, and will more fully hereafter. But the condition of our country, imperiled as it still was by a formidable revolt, was the absorbing theme. Strange as it may appear to the young reader, there were some in the free States (perhaps more than were sup- posed) who secretly hoped the rebels would be successful. These were called ‘‘Copperheads”—named after a species of serpent in the South, whose bite is as venomous as that of a rattlesnake, but give no audible warning to their vic- tims before assault. Our ministers were true to the National cause. No one would have been tolerated if he had shown any sympathy with the cause of the rebels. All our utterances gave proof of this. The report on the ‘‘State of the Country” was fully up to those of former years. It was followed by one or two on humanitarian organizations, of which the war furnished the occasion, but were eminently the product of our Chris- tian civilization. These were the Christian Commission and the Freedmen’s Aid Commission. The Christian Com- mission, in its organic form, owes its existence to the pal Church, not less devoted than the best, is, by its numbers, the most important of all. It is no fault in others that the Methodist Episcopal Church sends more soldiers into the field, more nurses into the hospitals, and more prayers to heaven, than any other. God bless the Methodist Church! God bless all the Churches! And blessed be God who giveth us the Churches!” 208 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. instrumentality of that renowned Christian philanthropist, George H. Stewart, of Philadelphia. Its great thought was to carry relief, spiritual and physical, to our soldiers in field, camp, or hospital. Its work was done mainly by ministers who would give six or eight weeks of their time— having only their expenses borne—to circulate religious literature, labor with the sick and wounded in any way that was needed, and to preach in camps, hospitals, etc.., as there was opportunity. Thus many were cared for that could not have been assisted in any other way. These “delegates,” as they were called, were not regarded as sol- diers; so they were not, as were the chaplains, controlled by strict military discipline. They supplemented the work of the chaplains, and were regarded, by such as were fit to be chaplains, as important auxiliaries. Florence Nightingale, an English lady of rank and wealth, went as an angel of mercy to the bloody fields of the Crimean war to perform some of these offices; and perhaps her work there suggested the idea of the Chris- tian Commission. Be that as it may, both were in the spirit of the Great Master’s teaching—practical exhibitions of the lesson inculeated by the parable of the Good Samaritan. Though no one was appointed at the Conference of 1868 to any work connected with the army, yet, in course of the year, four offered themselves and were accepted in the relations now to be stated. C. G. Lathrop, P. S. Bennett, and Geo. Fellows were sent as delegates of the Christian Commission to the Department of the Mississippi. Mr. Lathrop was taken ill in St. Louis, and soon returned to Wisconsin. Mr. Bennett spent several weeks in the work, mainly in Vicksburg and Memphis, where he saw something of the ravages of war, and was twice under rebel fire. Mr. Fellows’s work was all in Memphis. An incident will here be given to show the spirit that ANNALS OF 1864. 209 prevailed in the ‘‘ better class of society” in St. Louis: Mr. Bennett reached that city on Friday, May 13, 1864, and immediately reported to the office of the commission there. He was ordered to remain till Monday, when he. was to proceed down the river to Vicksburg. By invita- tion of the pastor, he occupied the pulpit of a fashionable Presbyterian Church on Sabbath morning. The member- ship was divided on the great issue of the day—some were intensely loyal, others in strong sympathy with the Rebel- lion. In the opening services he prayed for the success of the Government in the terrible ordeal through which it was passsing; for those in arms against it, that they might be brought to a better mind; for that unfortunate race that was in a transition from bondage to freedom. All this was very offensive to rebel sympathizers, and a score or more left the house in disgust and disorder before the prayer was ended. The Missouri Democrat, the next day, gave them a scathing rebuke, and called on the com- mandant of the post to take them in custody as rebels. G. A. England also served for a short time as a del- egate; but of his work the writer has no knowledge. Samuel Fallows was commissioned lieutenant-colonel of a ‘hundred-day regiment,” and went to Memphis with it in June of the same year. He did good service there, and was afterwards brevetted brigadier-general.* As to the general plan of the work, as well as the work itself, we see but little change. Beaver Dam District was disbanded as such, and its appointments placed in other districts. * A considerable number of this regiment were students in Lawrence University, one of whom, McKendree, son of Rev. M. Himebaugh, fell a victim to the typhoid fever, in Memphis, Tennessee. He was a noble youth, of much promise to the Church and the world. 210 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE, 8. C. Thomas succeeded W. H. Sampson as presiding elder of Milwaukee District; and P. S. Bennett was ap- pointed to the charge of Appleton District, in place of M. _Himebaugh. The other districts retained their former incumbents. Six preachers were received on trial, 7 located, 7 were returned supernumerary, and 17 superannuated. Thus we had 5 less effective men than the year before, and 8 less pastoral charges. A diminution of numbers appears in all the reports of this year. The total loss in the laity and ministry was 997. But with this loss of numbers, our benevolent contri- butions amounted to $794.68 more than the preceding year. Six preachers were received on trial, and one was dis- continued. Seven located, some of whom were, in after years, readmitted. The Norwegian work throughout the State was organ- ized into a district, and connected with the West Wiscon- sin Conference, with O. P. Peterson as presiding elder. This arrangement carried with it 248 ministers and members, which fact accounts, in part, for the loss of this year. Death spared our preachers this year, but seized four of their wives. Mrs. Racueu C. Knox was the first victim. Her death occurred December 28, 1863. She wasa superior woman. In 1846 she graduated from the State Normal School, at Albany, New York, and thereafter was preceptress in schools of high grade, till disease and death closed her work. She sustained that relation to the female depart- ment of Lawrence University from the time of her mar- riage to Dr. Knox, in 1861, till near the close of her use- ful life. Few more noble and symmetrical characters ever graced any literary institution or Church. ANNALS OF 1865. 211 Mrs. EvizaABETH Prisstuy, wife of Rev. T. C. Willson, followed her, on the first day of February, 1864. She was a graduate of our Lawrence University; a woman of uni- form piety and great promise of usefulness. Mrs. Cornetia B. Oucort, wife of Rev. D. T. Olcott, another very devoted Christian, exchanged mortality for life, July 20, 1864. Like Mrs. Willson, she promised great usefulness. Among her last utterances were, ‘‘ Pre- cious Jesus!” ‘I can not sing here, but I shall soon sing, ‘Unto Him that hath loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood—to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever!’” The name of Mrs. N. Louisa Requa, wife of Rev. J. D. Requa, completes the death-roll for this year. She de- parted October 2, 1864, three days before the session of our Conference began. She had been but a short time a pastor’s wife, but had greatly endeared herself to all who knew her, as an amiable, devoted, Christian woman, of great future promise. 1865. The nineteenth session of the Wisconsin Conference commenced this year on the fourth day of October, in Summerfield Church, Milwaukee. Bishop Baker appeared for the third time as its president. But two Methodist Conferences had been previously held in the metropolis of our State, the Rock River Con- ference, in 1844, and the Wisconsin, in 1857. So even there our convocation was a very enjoyable rarity; and that, too, though the State Convention of the Presby- terian and Congregational Churches was in session at the same time. Samuel Fallows was re-elected secretary. W. P. Stowe and E. D. Farnham were his assistants. R. W. Bosworth was statistical secretary. 212 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. The year had been a very eventful one in the history of our country. At the last session of our Conference the War of the Rebellion was raging. The long, bloody ‘‘ Battle of the Wilderness” had been fought, and indi- cations of the Nation’s triumph were more encouraging than perhaps at any former time. But there was still much strength and determination on the part of the rebel army. Now all was changed. On the third day of April, of this year, Richmond, the capital of the Confederacy, was taken by our forces; and on the ninth day of the same month, General Lee’s army surrendered to General Grant, which event virtually ended the Rebellion. The next day Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, who had fled from Richmond while the Union army was entering, was captured in Georgia. These were days of great re- joicing throughout the North, which continued until] the 14th, when a wave of sorrow not easily described rolled over all our loyal domain at the announcement that our noble President, Abraham Lincoln, had been assassinated. Still, we came together with far less sadness than for several years before. The Rebellion was crushed; the supremacy of the Government was demonstrated; slavery, as a system in the United States, was destroyed; and of the nearly one hundred thousand that had gone out from our State to the beleaguered field, those that survived had re- turned to their homes. Many of these were of our own household, and were now taking their places again in the ranks of Immanuel, to fight a bloodless battle with the enemy of all righteousness. Of course we were encour- aged, even though sad at the havoc of the last few years. The report on the ‘‘State of the Country,” of course, recognized the altered condition of things. .While ex- pressing appropriate gratitude to the Ruler of nations and the brave men who had imperiled their lives to save the commonwealth, it justly censured the oppression of the ANNALS OF 1865, 213 colored race in being deprived of the right of civil fran- chise. The reader will bear in mind that the Fifteenth Amendment to our National Constitution had not then been adopted, and that the Conference was still trying to shape public sentiment in regard to human rights and the best interests of our country, instead of following the lead of demagogues. For several years the subject of lay representation in the General Conference had been agitated in some portions of our country, particularly in New York, Philadelphia, and New England. The Church at large did not seem to feel much interest in it. The General Conference of 1860 submitted it to a vote of the conferences and male mem- bers of the Church; but it failed to receive their sanction, as previously stated. Still the agitation continued. It seemed more intense and more general in the ministry than in the laity. Some doubted the wisdom of the meas- ure, though all admitted the right of the laity to repre- sentation, at least that this should be accorded them when- ever they signified a desire for it with any considerable degree of unanimity. The Conference, therefore, this year referred the matter to a committee, of which I. Searls was chairman. The substance of their report was that representation in the higher councils of the Church should be allowed to the laity whenever they should be united in asking it. The Conference accepted this, and we shall hereafter see they acted in good faith. The educational and benevolent interests of the Church were all duly cared for through the year. Rev. George M. Steele, of whom more will be heard, was elected presi- dent of the College at the previous annual meeting of the Joint Board, and had entered upon his work. But, to the regret of all, he was kept from the Conference session by illness. Appropriate mention was made of this in the re- port on Education, and also a hearty welcome extended to 214 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. him as the head of our cherished University. A noticeable feature of the report was a commendation of our ‘‘ Public Schools.” The resolution relating to them is here given: “ Resolved, That we, in common with other Christian de- nominations, have a deep interest in the public schools of the State, and that we deem it the duty of our ministers and peo- ple to manifest their interest by frequently visiting the schools, atttending the business meetings of the districts and wards, and by assisting in every practicable way to promote the use- fulness of these schools. L. L. Knox, Chairman.” Accessions to the ministry continued to be very slight— four being received on trial, and only one into full con- nection. Taken together, this is the smallest number received in our history thus far. It is true two were readmitted who had formerly been members—making, in all, seven accessions. But one located, and four proba- tioners were discontinued. Last year we recorded the deaths of four preachers’ wives. During the year just closed three preachers were called away. Romutus O. KELLoge was received on trial in 1862, and into full membership in 1864. His death occurred January 27, 1865, in the third year of his itinerant minis- try, and in his first pastorate. He was the son of Leverett 8. Kellogg—so prominent in the early days of Methodism in Milwaukee. Graduating at the Wesleyan University, in Middletown, Connecticut, in 1849, he soon became con- nected with the Board of Instruction in our rising institu- tion at Appleton, where he continued several years, and exerted a most salutary influence upon the students there. His moral worth can scarcely be overstated. He was a fine scholar, but not an easy extemporizer. His sermons, therefore, cost him much labor; and on this account he overtaxed himself, shattered his nervous system, and pre- maturely closed a useful life. ANNALS OF 1865, 215 Henry Requa commenced life on earth, January 6, 1820, and closed it May 19, 1865, at Little Rock, Arkan- sas, where he was caring for our ‘‘ Boys in Blue,” as a delegate of the Christian Commission. His itinerant minis- try began in this State in 1847. He filled some important appointments, was two years a presiding elder, and at the time of bis death was pastor of our Church at Ripon. This was the second time that Church bad been bereft of a pastor. He was a man of marked individuality. Earnest, and somewhat impulsive, he took his positions promptly, and adhered to them firmly till convinced he was wrong. His end was quite triumphant. GrorGE CHESTER was converted in England, under the labors of Rev. James Caughey, at the age of about sixteen years. He joined our Conference in 1851, and labored quite successfully till near the close of the year 1865, when, on the 24th of September, after battling that terrible disease, typhoid fever, for about three weeks, he yielded to its power. Just before he passed away ‘‘he clasped his hands, nearly palsied in death, and whispered, ‘Glory! Glory! Glory!’” Three more were placed on the list of supernumeraries than the previous year, and three had died; so we had a smaller force of effective men. We had, however, made a gain of five church edifices, two parsonages, and 554 mem- bers, with a commendable advance in our benevolences. 216 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER X. 1866-7. HE beautiful young city of Ripon was this year favored with the annual session of our Conference. The city stands on the northwestern verge of what was known as Ceresco Prairie—perhaps the queen of Wisconsin prairies— and owes its existence largely to an unusually fertile country around it. Ripon College, founded in an early day, under the auspices of the Congregational denomination also con- tributes to its importance and growth. Ripon first appears as a pastoral charge in 1855, and the next year a church edifice is reported. It is a very neat framed building, 90 by 40 feet in size, with a good lecture-room and three class-rooms in the basement. It cost $7,000, and will seat five hundred people—almost twice as many as some churches that cost much more. A parson- age followed after a few years, and in the summer of 1889 a much better one was purchased for $1,700. The Conference convened on the sixth day of Septem- ber, and was called to order by Bishop Davis W. Clark, All the secretaries were the same as the preceding year, but the president was an entirely newman among us. His name, however, had long been familiar to us. In 1851 he was elected president of our rising university at Appleton ; but as he did not accept the situation, few of our preachers had been favored with his acquaintance. From 1852 to 1864 he was editor of the Ladies’ Repository, and thus his became a household name in all our land. ANNALS OF 1866. 217 The General Conference of 1864 added to the episco- pal force three strong men—D. W. Clark, Edward Thom- son, and Calvin Kingsley. The two last named never visited us. They both died in the performance of their official duties, away from their homes—the former at Wheeling, W. Va., March 22, 1870; the latter at Beyrout, Turkey, on the sixth day of the following month. Bishop Clark endeared himself to us by his great kindness, wise utterances, and marked executive ability. The usual custom is for the bishop to preach one ser- mon during the Conference session—on Sabbath morning. But Bishop Clark gave us, in addition, a fine discourse on Friday afternoon on the ‘‘ Centenary of American Meth- odism.” The reader should bear in mind that on the twenty- sixth day of October, 1766, the first Methodist class on this continent was formed by Philip Embury, in the city of New York, and that, per order of the General Confer- ence, this event was celebrated throughout the country by “* special services and thank-offerings.” October seems to have been a somewhat epochal month for Methodism. On the 25th of October, 1739, Mr. Wesley formed the first Methodist society or class in England. As just stated, the first one in America was formed in the same month. And two years and two days from the latter event— viz,, October 28, 1768—the first Methodist church edifice in all this broad land was dedicated by Mr. Embury. Two new benevolent enterprises were assuming organ- ized forms, with pressing demands upon the Church. These were the Freedmen’s Aid Society and the Church Exten- sion Society. The latter, or something like it, had been a felt. want of the Church for years. Rev. Dr. Kynett, of the Upper Iowa Conference, is the accredited originator of this new departure in Church-work. It was brought before us at this session by Dr. 8. Y. Monroe, its first corre- 18 218 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. sponding secretary, and a Conference society was formed, of which G. M. Steele was president. This was auxiliary to the parent society, organized by the last General Con- ference, whose head-quarters were in Philadelphia. We shall hear of its grand achievements in coming years. The Freedmen’s Aid Society grew out of the abolition of slavery. The fetters of four million bondmen were melted in the fierce fires of the Rebellion. Scarcely one of this vast number knew a letter of the alphabet, yet all soon became citizens of the United States. Such a mass of ignorance, with all the rights of the most cultured, would have been a very dangerous element in the body politic but for the intense loyalty of the Negro race to the General Government. Indeed, this was not a sufficient guarantee of safety, for it was evident that unprincipled demagogues could mislead them. The United States Con- gress, therefore, began to make provision for their education. But after a little time the adverse clamor of politicians prevailed, and this abused race was deserted by the Gov- ernment which they gallantly aided to rescue from the bloody hand of treason. But the Church of Christ, as it ever has, acted the part of the Good Samaritan. Nor was the Methodist Episcopal Church laggard in this work. It organized a society, and provided for auxiliaries in all the Annual Conferences. Such an auxiliary was this year formed in our Conference. Another grave question had arisen out of the issues of the war; viz., that of reconstructing the Southern States. While the Conference disclaimed all intention and all right to dictate legislation, it did assert its privilege and duty to use its influence by public and private speech to dissemi- nate and impress the moral principles that should dominate the Nation. Politicians told us we were meddling with what did not concern us, that we had better confine our- selves to the gospel, etc., just as they do now, to oppose ANNALS OF 1866. 219 our temperance work. But they did not silence us, nor will they in the present contest with the liquor-power of this Nation. Although the institutions calling for pecuniary aid in- creased, the Conference did not neglect those already ex- isting. Indeed, they were more liberally supported. During the war we had hard work to hold our own in membership. This was the first year, with one exception, that our aggregate number of ministers, members, and probationers equaled that of 1860. But our benevolent collections increased in that time from $2,131.41 to $10,409.54. During the same period we built more than twenty churches, and nearly as many parsonages, with an aggre- gate increase in the valuation of church property of $174,425. During the year just closed we had increased our be- nevolent collections $1,149.97, the value of our church property $87,675, and our total membership 470. The number of pastoral charges was precisely the same as the last year, and that of effective ministers six more, thus re- ducing the number of places ‘‘to be supplied.” Only four were received on trial, two of whom have risen to distinguished positions, Samuel Lugg and J. L. Hewitt. Mrs. Exuiza ANN JENNE, wife of Rev. J. H. Jenne, and Mrs. Mary WiILiarp, wife of Rev. W. Willard, were taken away by death during the past year. Mrs. Jenne died at Lake Mills, November 16, 1865, after bearing, with her husband, the toils and responsibili- ‘ties of our itinerancy for twenty-four years. She was a very noble woman, universally esteemed, and died sus- tained by the hope of the righteous. Mrs. Willard had a shorter pilgrimage in the itinerant field, most of which was in mission-work among the Oneidas, where she was very useful as a teacher and as an 220 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. exemplar to the female Indians. She died January 22, 1866, of consumption, brought on by overwork and ex- posure. Geo. Fellows, J. Van Voris, Wm. Morse, J. D. Requa, and Thos. Orbison, who had been temporarily disconnected with the itinerancy, were readmitted. The Minutes show one district less than last year. Racine District, as such, was disbanded, and its appoint- ments incorporated in other districts. H.C. Tilton had been in charge of it for four years. The incumbents of the other districts remained as before. 1867. The twenty-first session of our Conference was this year held in the city of Beaver Dam, commencing on the sec- ond day of October. Bishop Matthew Simpson appeared as president, called the Conference to order, and pro- ceeded in the solemn service of the eucharist, according to our established custom. This remarkable man had presided over our Confer- ence once before, and during the eleven intervening years had occasionally visited our territory for some special work. Meanwhile his reputation as a preacher, as the intimate friend and counselor of President Lincoln, and, indeed, in almost every respect, had spread far and wide. We therefore hailed his second episcopal visit with great delight. The same secretaries that had served us for the two years next preceding, were re-elected. In the routine of Conference business there was little to distinguish this from ordinary sessions. A coincidence similar to that of the secretaries may be seen in the number received on trial. For three suc- cessive years this class consisted of just four. Pastors and pastoral charges did not increase as fast as ANNALS OF 1867. : 221 the laity; nor they as rapidly as their contributions for benevolent and religious purposes. We had a small re-enforcement from other sources. Geo. W. Wells was admitted to membership in the Con- ference from the Primitive Methodist Church, and E. W. Stevens from the Wesleyan Methodist Church. Wm. Averill, who had retired to the local ranks a few years before, was readmitted. Two located and two withdrew from the connection. Five less were returned as supernumerary, and one more placed upon the superannuated list than the previous year. So we gained six to the effective work, being just the num- ber gained the year before. Several brethren received at this Conference deserve honorable mention, but as they will naturally come to view hereafter, they are passed for the present. As the name of Professor Mason appears among us for the last time this year, it is but just to pay him deserved tribute. Russell Z. Mason was a graduate of Wesleyan University, at Middletown, Connecticut. For some time he was professor in McKendree College. In 1855 he was elected to, and accepted, a professorship in Lawrence Uni- versity, and was president from 1861 to 1865. He was a scholar of no ordinary rank, especially in the sciences. As a man he was genial, kind, frank, and noble. It was difficult for any one to dislike him; but unfortunately he became tinctured with modern spiritism. Just to what extent he received its dogmas or vagaries, it is not easy to tell; but while he had no affinity for its blasphemous and immoral teachings, he accepted enough of the system to unsettle his faith in some theories usually deemed orthodox, aud to unsettle the faith of orthodox Christians in him as a safe counselor of youth. Thus, for several of the latter years of his connection with the college, many believed that he was sowing the seeds of skepticism in young minds, 222 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. that would produce a harvest of ruin. Being convinced that the interests of the college demanded it, he quietly resigned in 1865, but continued a firm friend of the insti- tution. None regretted the necessity of this more than those who believed it imperative. During the Conference year ending 1867, he withdrew from the ministry and membership of the Methodist Episcopal Church. So far as is known to the writer, he has never connected himself with any other. He is now in Colorado, an assayist of ore. This may be an honorable calling; but with his abilities he ought to be ministering to human needs on a higher plane and broader scale. As time passed on we see no weakening of the moral spine of the Conference in opposing sin in high places, even though intrenched in political organizations. The following resolution, adopted at this session, is significant of this: “* Resolved, That we recognize, with fearful apprehen- sions, an existing purpose to repeal the laws in reference to our holy Sabbath, and that any political party sympa- thizing with such a measure forfeits all claims upon the confidence and support of Christian men.” This hasthe rightring. If all ecclesiastical bodies would thus enter a protest against anti-Christian schemes in legis- lation, and then, in case politicians disregard it, utterly withdraw their ‘‘ support,” the future of our country would be much brighter than it is. Special agents for Churches, or some other worthy cause, often visit our Conference to solicit financial aid; and they always ask in faith. And probably their faith is strength- ened by the fact that they always have received. At this Conference, Rev. Frank De Haas, D. D., pas- tor of the Metropolitan Church in Washington, appeared in its behalf. Years before—even as early as 1855—the enterprise was brought before us; and it was urged that ANNALS OF 1867. ‘223 we, as a denomination, were not properly represented in the Capital of our Nation, and that this would meet the demands of the case. This appeared all right; but such was the relation of the Baltimore Conference (in whose bounds this Church was located) to slavery, that the Con- ference did not espouse the cause very heartily. Some, however, gave liberally to it. But now the case was changed. Slavery was dead, and the Nation was alive. The Conference showed its interest in the cause by pledg- ing $680. At the same session the Conference gave $45 to aid in a church-building for colored people in Janesville. It still further showed its good-will by the adoption of the following resolutions: ‘‘ WHEREAS, The interests of Methodism in the State of Wisconsin demand a representation at the Capital com- mensurate with their great and growing importance; and “WHEREAS, The feebleness of our Church at that point has hitherto prevented a fair showing before the world; therefore, ‘‘ Resolved, That we will hail with satisfaction any well- directed movement towards building a church at Madison worthy the denomination, and will heartily co-operate in such an enterprise.” It should be remembered that none of these stood con- nected with our Conference, and also that the contribu- tions were almost entirely from the pockets of preachers. For some years hop-raising had been on the increase, and some of our people had gone into the business, with the idea that hops were extensively used in tanning leather. This was a delusive snare. It required but little investi- gation to satisfy any one that all the tanning they did was on the coating of human stomachs. The Conference put itself on record in this way : ‘« Resolved, That we will ever discountenance supplying 224 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. the market with that which will probably be used in the manufacture of malt or spirituous liquors.” The small church edifice mentioned on a former page, though improved in its appearance, was entirely inadequate to the present needs of the people. Great anxiety was therefore felt in regard to ‘“‘ our next preacher.” So much depended on the preacher, especially in early times, in carrying on church-building enterprises, that this was a very natural feeling. Rev. C. E. Carpenter, then a rising young man, was selected for the responsible place. Among the prominent laymen there may be mentioned Mr. David Newman. He and his estimable wife were deeply interested in this enterprise. The latter has become ex- tensively known as the first woman in our Church elected as a lay delegate to the General Conference. Several years before, they had removed to Colorado. The Freedmen’s Aid and Church Extension Societies came prominently to view, and decisive steps were taken in their favor. So, indeed, of all the benevolencies. The state of the country was still an absorbing subject. The most alarming feature was that ‘‘ political parties were showing signs of succumbing” to this influence. Against all this the Conference uttered a decided protest in the adoption of a strong report on the State of the Country, evidently written by Dr. Bannister, chairman of the com- mittee on that subject. True, the war had closed, slavery as a system was no more, and reconstruction was progressing. But another gigantic evil began to loom in the moral heavens. A large class of our foreign-born population—mostly Germans— were not only turning the Christian Sabbath into a holiday for all kinds of sports and wickedness, but demanding the repeal of all laws for its observance, and for the protection of others from their noisy demonstration on that day. There was no change in the general plan of the work. ANNALS OF 1867, 225 The districts were the same as the year before, and their incumbents also. There were 124 effective ministers, three of whom were missionaries in foreign fields, three were employed in the interests of the Western Seaman’s Friend Society, four in the Bible work, and three in the educational field. So, as usual, several were employed by the presiding elders to man the pastoral charges. The whole number connected with the Church was 12,635. Fifteen churches and five parsonages were built during the year. At Evansville the old church edifice gave place toa better one, which was erected at a cost of $6,000. It seats about three hundred and fifty. A parsonage followed in 1869, valued at $1,000. The total collection for benevolent purposes was $10,925, an increase of $516. G. M. Steele, W. G. Miller, Samuel Fallows, Henry Bannister, and C. D. Pillsbury were elected delegates to the General Conference, to be held in Chicago, commencing May 1, 1868. S. C. Thomas, Jos. Anderson, and E. S. Grumly were elected reserve delegates. 19 226 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE, t CHAPTER XI. 1868-9. ue HE twenty-second session of the Wisconsin Confer- ence of the Methodist Episcopal Church was held at Racine, Wisconsin, beginning at nine o’clock, A. M., October 1, 1868, Bishop E. R. Ames presiding.” Samuel Fallows was elected secretary, with H. Colman and E. D. Farnham as assistants, and R. W. Bosworth, statistical secretary. The reader may see that the only change in the secre- taries, for the three last preceding years, was the first as- sistant, H. Colman, taking the place of W. P. Stowe. Bishop Ames was well known to us, as this was his fourth official visit to our Conference. It also proved to be the last. He was elected to the episcopacy in 1852, and honored the office for many years. His presidency in Annual and General Conferences was marked with prompt- ness and magisterial dignity. Englishmen were sometimes reminded by his manner of judges in their own country. Yet there was nothing unkind in his nature. If, at any time, he seemed severe, it was because the case demanded a sort of severity. He was occasionally sarcastic, but his sarcasm was of the highest order, as the reader can see by the following incident: Many years ago, while he was presiding elder on In- dianapolis District, a severe contest was going on in Indi- ana in reference to the establishment of public schools. His duty called him to attend a camp-meeting in a county , ANNALS OF 1868, 227 where there was great opposition to the proposed innova- tion. There were two newspapers in the county, diverse in politics generally, but vying with each other in oppos- ing the public-school project. On the Sabbath there was a crowd, and the editors of the two papers were present. Elder Ames preached in the morning, and, in course of his sermon, said: ‘‘ Before I came to this county I sup- posed its inhabitants were a very ignorant class of people, and iu favor of having their children grow up in igno- rance. But my horse cast a shoe, and I stopped to have it reset. While the smith was doing this I amused myself in viewing the pictures pasted on the walls of his shop, and saw one of a half-grown hog, under which was printed, ‘The Learned Pig.’ Then said I to myself: ‘The people of Rush County are not opposed to education, after all. The only question with them is, where to begin; and they have decided to begin with the pigs!’ Well, all right; the children will come in by and by.” At another time an indiscreet person spoke in a Con- ference love-feast, and mentioned some of his mean tricks before he was converted, greatly to the disgust of all present. As he sat down the bishop remarked, in his cool way: ‘‘I trust that brother is so thoroughly ashamed of those bad actions that he will never allude to them again in public.” Such sallies of real wit bespeak a masterly mind. The subject of lay representation in the General Con- ference, which had been agitated for years, took on a new phase at this session. The Fifteenth Delegated General Conference, held in Chicago in May of that year, adopted a plan of representation with unexpected unanimity, and submitted it to a vote of the whole Church for action. This was quite different from the submission years before, as it allowed all members—male and female— over twenty-one years of age to vote. If sanctioned by 228 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. the ministry and laity, two lay delegates were to be elected by an Electoral Conference, composed of laymen within the bounds of each Annual Conference, to meet once in four years, at the place of the Annual Conference session next preceding each General Conference. But in case an Annual Conference was entitled to but one delegate by the basis of representation, then only one lay delegate was allowed from its territory. The Conference heartily acquiesced in the plan, and pledged faithful co-operation in its execution. The Conference still watched with careful eye the great moral issues that entered into our National politics ; for our country was still imperiled, as the following state- ments will show. Andrew Johnson, President since the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, in April, 1865, had evidently sold him- self to the South, and was in complete antagonism to the plans of Congress to reconstruct and restore order in that part of our country. This was a surprise to the North, as during the war he was intensely loyal. On the day of his inauguration as Vice-President he was so grossly intoxi- cated that his maudlin utterances were a disgrace to the Nation. It was suspected by some that the South cap- tured him while under the influence of. liquor, as it appears they carried the question of Secession by the same fiery agency. Be that as it may, it was soon evident that, though slavery as a system was destroyed, its spirit was not dead. Violence and fraud began to act their part in elections, and the lives of loyal men, white as well as colored, were in jeopardy. The Democratic party as such had no word of protest to this anti-American policy. It was thus made evident that the same moral issues enter into the present political situation that were involved in the Rebellion. Hence the Conference was shut up either to silence or to ANNALS OF 1868, 229 partisanship. But as silence, when moral issues are pend- ing, is either cowardice or disloyalty to conviction, it could not remain silent. And as the “partisanship” was either ‘Christian ” or ‘‘ anti-Christian” in character, its duty was plain ; it boldly denounced these outrages. As usual, our benevolent and humanitarian interests were duly cared for. Our literary institutions were considered in a promising condition. Our cherished university was still in need of a greatly increased endowment. The following extract from the report on Education shows its financial condition : ‘‘There is now in building, grounds, apparatus, cabi- net, and library, property to the amount of about one hundred and thirty-five thousand dollars ($135,000) ; pro- ductive endowment funds, about twenty-eight thousand dollars ($28,000) ; library endowment, ten thousand dol- lars ($10,000); making a total of one hundred and seventy-three thousand dollars ($173,000).” It will be seen that only a small portion of this sum afforded any help in meeting the current expenses of the school. How teachers and trustees kept heart and strug- gled on is marvelous. The Evansville Seminary had been doing ordinarily well; and the Biblical Institute at Evanston, Illinois, in which the Conference felt a deep interest, in common with several other Conferences, was constantly rising in im- portance and usefulness. A request came from parties in Whitewater to estab- lish a ‘‘Seminary” there, accompanied with what seemed to be a fair proposal to give financial aid to the under- taking. The matter was referred to a large and judicious committee of ministers and laymen to consider, and with authority to act in a specified way. The districts remained the same as the year before, but there was considerable change in their incumbents. 230 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. S. C. Thomas and C. D. Pillsbury, who had been on Milwaukee and Janesville Districts respectively, were ex- changed. P. B. Pease succeeded P. 8. Bennett on Appleton Dis- trict, and T. C. Willson, Joseph Anderson on the Waupaca District. W.G. Miller only, remained in his former field. Seven were received on trial; 3 who had been for a time in the local ranks were readmitted; 4 located; 8 transferred to other Conferences; 29 were placed upon the list of superannuates; 3 were appointed to educational work ; 5 to special agencies; 3 to foreign missionary fields; 6 new pastoral charges were formed; 9 new churches-were built; and 13,010 ministers and members were reported. In addition to these the old church at Oconomowoc was succeeded by a far better one. The former was erected in 1851, at a cost of $2,000, and would seat two hundred and fifty persons. The cost of the latter was $6,000. It is furnished with a lecture-room and class-rooms, in addi- tion to the auditorium, which will seat about four hundred and fifty. 1869, This year our Conference was held the second time in Appleton, and Bishop Scott appeared for the fifth time as its president. No bishop had visited us officially as often, and no one was more heartily esteemed. His preaching abilities were not of the highest order, but he was exceedingly well- balanced—weak at no point. He had filled nearly every _ office in the gift of the Church, and proved equal to the demands of all. He seemed to have the meekness of Moses, combined with the unimpeachable fidelity of Daniel. His heart was full of sympathy for all, and especially for the families of itinerant ministers. He died July 18, 1882, beloved of all who knew him. ANNALS OF 1869, 231 There is a little variation from former years in the way the secretaries are designated. The record stands thus: ‘Rev. S. Fallows was re-elected secretary, and Rev. W. P. Stowe was appointed assistant secretary ; Rev. E. D. Farnham, recording secretary; and Rey. R. W. Bosworth, statistical secretary.” By order of the General Conference, fully indorsed by our own, a vote of the laity, male and female, had been taken in the month of June preceding, on the question of lay representation in the General Conference. The result in our bounds, as reported at this session, was as follows : Whole number of votes cast, oe 3,189 For lay delegation, ........ + + 2,805 Against lay delegation, .. ete Bo Vg BBE Majority for lay delegation, .. . .. 2,421 This vote did not indicate a great amount of interest in the matter pro or con. The vote of the Conference was more general, and the proportionate majority for the measure about three times as large. It was 122 for, and 4 against, lay delegation. The Committee on the proposed Seminary at Whitewater appointed the year before, reported adversely, and the matter was dropped. Since then the State has established a normal school there. But this fact does not prove that the committee or the Conference acted unwisely. We had already on our hands two literary institutions, and both were struggling for continued existence. So, while we highly appreciated the generous offer made by the peo- ple of that fine city, we did not deem it wise to accept it. The new benevolent enterprises—the Church Exten- sion, Freedmen’s Aid, and Ministerial Educational Soci- cieties—were becoming better understood, and receiving more attention and support from year to year. And 232 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. though some who had acquainted themselves very thor- oughly with them, thought the Church far too slow in appreciating their claims, she was by no means indif- ferent, and probably moved as rapidly as was reasonable to expect. It takes time to introduce new customs, es- pecially so if they call for money. Still, when our people see a worthy cause, they are not disposed to close their ears to its cry for help. To give the reader a bird’s-eye view of the Church Extension Society, a condensed account of it is here presented. The Society was formed by direction of the General Conference of 1864, then in session in Philadelphia, and incorporated by the Legislature of Pennsylvania on the thirteenth day of the following March. Its object was to aid feeble Churches to build houses of worship. This it proposed to do in two ways: First, by direct donation, on express condition that the edifice should be completed and be free from debt after applying the donation. Sec- ondly, by loans to such Churches, for a reasonable time, with or without interest, at the discretion of a competent ‘Board of Managers,” whose head-quarters are in Phila- delphia. Each Annual Conference also was to appoint a board to aid in making judicious appropriations. All applications for aid must be made through this last-named board to the parent board, indorsed by the pastor of the Church and presiding elder of the district in which it is located. In this way an injudicious appropriation is very im- probable. The Society is mainly supplied with funds from public collections, to be taken in all the Churches every year; from private donations and bequests; it also receives money from parties who need the income of it during their lives, or for a specified time, and places it, at moderate interest, where it will help a poor Church, and benefit them as well. ANNALS OF 1869. 233 Donations made to this fund are carefully looked after, and a report made to the donors of the good work accom- plished thereby. The report of the Committee on Temperance this year was written by Geo. C. Haddock, who was assassinated by order of Gambrinus, in Sioux City, August 2, 1884. The following extract will show that he, and others who are in earnest for ‘practical temperance work,” foresaw what must soon be done: ‘*Inasmuch as the present political organizations in our State persistently ignore this great question, . . . we see no other way left open to us than to labor for the speedy formation of a political organization that shall have for its object the securing of prohibitory legislation, and that will present pure, virtuous temperance men for the suf- frages of the people.” In the general plan of the work there was but little change. The Norwegian appointments within our Conference limits, that were transferred to the West Wisconsin Con- ference in 1864, were this year re-transferred, and formed into a district, with A. Haagersen as presiding elder. H. S. White succeeded W. G. Miller on Fond du Lac District; the appointees to the others were the same as the year before. Our number in the ministerial ranks had been gradu- ally increasing since the war. This year 9 were received on trial and 2 readmitted; but we lost 2 by withdrawal, 4 by transfer, 1 by location, and 1 by death. Of some of these it is proper to add a few words. A. B. Randall, one of the two who this year withdrew from the Church, had been connected with the Conference since 1846. He was a man of good ability, and had done good service in different fields. But he eventually found himself out of harmony with our doctrines and work, in consequence of his affinity for spiritism. 234 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Cyrus Scammon came to us, in 1857, from Maine, where he had been for some time in the itinerant ministry, and, after filling several stations with fair success, be- came a believer in Swedenborgianism, and peacefully with- drew from the Church. T. O. HotiistEr, a mighty man of God and a most indefatigable laborer, had passed to his inheritance be- yond the flood. For about seventeen years he was one of our most reliable, earnest, and successful ministers, both in pastoral and district work. He had an iron constitution, yet he overtaxed his energies, and died prematurely, March 18, 1869. The reports to the Conference showed an increase of eight churches and five parsonages, with an increased valuation of $41,455. Perhaps the most successful of the eight churches are those in Oshkosh and Bay View. Occasional services were held on the south side of the river, in Oshkosh, in the Conference year 1867-8. At the Conference of .1868 the place was made a pastoral charge, to which C. W. Brewer was appointed. A society was organized’ of thirty-five members. They entered promptly upon the erection of a church edifice, and ded- icated the basement on the 6th of December following. The building was finished in 1872, during the pastorate of J. Anderson. Much embarrassment was experienced in its completion, but the energy and push of the pastor were equal to the emergency. They have since erected a good parsonage. The present valuation of the entire property is $8,500. Bay View may be noticed in another place. ANNALS OF 1870, 235 CHAPTER XII. 1870-1. HE Conference of 1870 was held in Court Street Church, Janesville, commencing October 12th. This - was a pastoral charge of recent origin. Its first appear- ance in the Minutes was in 1869. Two sessions of the Conference had been held in the ‘‘ First Church,” in 1854 and 1860. We were pleased to greet Bishop Davis W. Clark for the second time as president. According to the record, ‘‘ Rev. Samuel Fallows was re-elected secretary, and W. P. Stowe, W. W. Case, E. D. Farnham and §. Smith were appointed assistant sec- retaries.” There seems but little to record this year, unless we look into the work of individual Churches. But as this would require too much space, the reader must accept a brief sketch. The work is growing moderately. Nine were received on trial, five were transferred to us from other Confer- ences, and two were received from other denominations. Per contra, two located, and seven were tranferred to other Conferences, leaving a net gain in our ministerial force of only seven. Five new names of pastoral charges appear; but Clem- ensville and Menominee Falls being merely changes of names, there were really but three. At the latter place _H. W. Frink formed a class in 1839, while in charge of 236 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Watertown Mission; but Samuel Pillsbury, in charge of Aztalan Circuit, visited the place and preached there in 1837, The districts and their incumbents were the same as last year. We were evidently looking after various in- terests, as four were appointed to the Bible agency, two to the Seaman’s Friend work, three to the educational field, and four to foreign missions. One of our number, Rev. S. Fallows, had been hon- ored with an election to the State Superintendency of Public Instruction, and the Conference unanimously re- quested the bishop to appoint him thereto. A favorable recognition of public schools by the Conference was noted in the annals of 1865. This year the Conference appointed a Committee on the ‘* Relation of the Church to Common Schools.” Dr. G. M. Steele, president of our university, was chairman. Their entire report, heartily adopted by the Conference, is worthy a place in these pages; but a brief extract must suffice : ‘The common-school system is the offspring of the religion of the Bible. The opponents of a real, and the advocates of an emasculated or spurious Christianity, make much boast of their zeal for popular education ; but it re- mains historically demonstrable that nowhere - except among Evangelical Protestants has a plan of instruction, embracing all the children of the community, ever been adopted. It is true that even in false religions, in propor- tion as they have approximated the true, there has been an influence favorable to education; and out of these va- rious religions have come all the successful systems of mental training the world has ever seen. Atheism and ir- religion have never devised any permanent scheme with this object in view.” Very different is the tone of this from the violent as- ANNALS OF 1870, 237 sault of the Roman Catholic priesthood upon our common school system, one of the pillars of our National fabric. Our general educational interests appeared to be in a prosperous condition, though this year Evansville Semi- nary disappears from our records. Eight new church edifices were reported—in one of which the Conference held its session. Its estimated value was $35,000. A part of this value is in two stores in the first story. Over these is a fine auditorium, 50 by 75 feet, that will seat 600 persons; also a Sunday-school room, 40 by 50 feet; two class-rooms, 20 by 20 feet, and a good hall for various religious and humanitarian purposes. It is a massive brick edifice, in good architectural taste, and seems well located (on the corner of Court and Main Streets) for a “ People’s Church.” A beautiful brick church had been erected at Wauwatosa also. This place had been the head of a circuit for twenty- two years; and although three church edifices had been built within its boundaries this growing village had re- mained destitute of one till now. The enterprise was undertaken with some misgivings as to success; but enconraged by the zeal and liberality of the pastor—J. P. Roe, to whom much credit is due—the small band worked with great harmony and pushed it to completion. The edifice is 65 by 36, feet with addition in the rear of 24 by 30 feet. The auditorium will seat 325 persons. Its valuation in 1889 was $10,000, and a fine brick parsonage near, erected about ten years after the church edifice, is valued at $4,000. They are models of neatness and convenience. Statistics do not always indicate the exact progress of religious work. Still they are an important factor in the problem. By these we must judge of the work of this year. The reports show an increase of communicants in the Church of 519; of church edifices, 6; of parsonages, 3 ; 238 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. with an increased aggregate value of $205,530. Also an increase of 54 Sunday-schools and 1,412 scholars. But in the general benevolences there was a decrease. 1871. For the third time Milwaukee was this year favored with the session of our Conference, and for the third time it was favored with Bishop Simpson as president, who called it to order in Summerfield Church at nine o'clock A. M., October 11, 1871. As a presiding officer his ability did not rise above that of some of his colleagues in the episcopacy. But as a preacher he had a world-wide repu- tation, and for occasional sermons especially, he was doubt- less the ‘‘ Prince of the American pulpit.” Gentle, court- eous, kind, he was a favorite with all. This was his last official visit to our Conference. He continued to do grand service to the Church until June 18, 1884, when he joined the long list of victors through the blood of the Lamb beyond the conflicts of time. As to the other Conference officers the record says: “S. Fallows was elected secretary; E. D. Farnham, recording secretary; S. Smith, statistical secretary ; and W. P. Stowe and W. W. Case, assistant secretaries.” Afterwards the last named was excused from acting. The general plan of the work was about the same as during the two previous years. The districts were the same, and their incumbents the same. There was an increase of but three pastoral charges. The reader will see the reason for a less increase in this respect than in former years, if he will note that the coun- try has been pretty well covered by our work for some time, and hence new charges are formed more by division of old, than by acquisition of new territory. But four were this year received on trial. Two were received by transfer, and one from another branch of the ANNALS OF 1871, 239 Methodist Church. But as three were transferred to other Conferences, and three removed by death, the addition to the ministerial force was very small. The action of the Conference in regard to the various lines of benevolence and moral reform was similar to that of former years. The following extract from the report on Temperance, written probably by G. C. Haddock, will show the unwavering firmness of the body: “ We can not but regard it as wicked and grossly in- consistent for men professing to be Christian and temper- ance men to vote for individuals who are in sympathy with the liquor-interest. In the present status of political affairs there is no question before the people that can at all compare with the suppression of the liquor-traffic, with all its attendant evils; and when we are brought to a point where loyalty to the party is treason to temperance and morality, there can be no doubt as to the course which temperance men ought to take. They must be true to their highest moral convictions, whatever may be- come of parties or politics.” It would be very assuring of speedy victory over the liquor-power if all ‘‘ professing to be Christian and tem- perance men” stood firmly on this platform. A spirited discussion occurred in connection with the report on ‘“ Popular Amusements.” In the preamble were urged what seems to the writer very sensible reasons why Christian people should refrain from certain ones, even if in themselves they are not vicious, such as dancing, theater- going, card-playing, and the like. Then came a supposed question from the laity: ‘‘How about croquet? If you ministers play this for amusement, and become all ab- sorbed in it, as some of you seem to, may not we play at other games for the same purpose?” To this it was replied: ‘‘Some of us play at croquet for mental relaxa- tion. If we have reason to believe that many of our, 240 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. people, good and true, see in this the appearance of evil, we feel bound by Scripture authority to desist.” This part of the report elicited the discussion referred to. The report closed with a resolution, ‘‘ that such amuse- ments as dancing, playing at cards, circus and theater- going, are inconsistent with Christian character ;” and all was adopted. The long struggle for the admission of laymen to the General Conference had culminated in the triumph of the proposed measure. And as the Sixteenth Delegated Gen- eral Conference was to be held in the May following, an electoral Conference was held on Friday afternoon, Octo- ber 13, 1871, to elect lay delegates thereto. Each pas- toral charge was entitled to one delegate to this body, and this body was authorized to elect two representatives to the General Conference. Eighty-five responded to the roll-call. Edwin Hyde was elected president, Byron Kings- bury, vice-president; George F. Lane, secretary. R. P. Elmore, of Milwaukee, and Hon. W. P. Lyon, of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, were elected delegates to the General Conference; and Professor H. A. Jones, of the Lawrence University, and Byron Kingsbury, of Ripon, reserve delegates. This, be it remembered, was the first gathering of the kind within our Conference territory, and they expressed their strong attachment to the Church of their choice, which, under God, had done so much for the world. Just the Sabbath previous to the session of these Conferences— viz., October 8, 1871—the great fires occurred which re- duced to ashes the best part of Chicago, utterly annihilated Peshtigo, in Northern Wisconsin, and nearly devastated a large region in that part of our State. Both Conferences ex- pressed their warm sympathy for the sufferers, and planned for substantial aid. This was seemly and a natural result ANNALS OF 1871. 241 of Christianity—a striking contrast to the indifference of the heathen world in like cirenmstances. The visible fruit of the year’s work was, on the whole, encouraging. The reports show an increase of 9 churches and 7 parsonages, with an increase in the valuation of church property of $22,350. Also, an increase of 22 Sunday-schools and 983 scholars, a large increase of the benevolences, and a total increase of the ministry and laity of 1,162. The ministerial delegates to the General Conference were G. M. Steele, P. B. Pease, H. Bannister, C. D. Pillsbury, W. G. Miller. Reserves—S. Fallows, W. H. Sampson, W. P. Stowe. Three preachers had died, and the wives of four others. Rev. Isaac SEARLS, who entered the itinerancy in the Rock River Conference in 1841, but did not become iden- tified with the work in Wisconsin till -1847, closed his earthly life, December 8, 1870, in Brandon, to which place he was appointed at the previous Conference. He was a safe, reliable man, had done good work as pastor and as presiding elder, and commanded universal respect. His robust constitution seemed to promise more years; but by such cases we are often reminded that ‘‘ the battle is not to the strong.” The closing scene with him was glorious. He said: ‘‘ Jesus is mine, Jesus is mine. He saves to the uttermost. He saves me to the uttermost. I am standing on the Rock, on the Rock!” Tuomas Hueus was received on trial in our Confer- ence in 1863, did good work among his Welsh countrymen for a few years, then passed to the superannuate list, and died, a few weeks before the present Conference, in Utica, New York. R. H. STincHFIELD came to us in 1864, by transfer from the Maine Conference, and died suddenly on his way 20 242 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. to an evening Church service, December 8, 1870. He was reputed as a very good man, but did only a little service in our Conference. Mes. Exiza Movutturop, wife of Rev. L. F. Moulthrop, was numbered among the dead at some time during the past year; but the writer has not been able to learn just when. She was highly esteemed by those who knew her. Mrs. Mary S. Jonzs, after a brief sojourn in a re- ligious life and in the itinerancy with her husband, Rev. H. H. Jones, ‘‘died in great peace,” in Lowell, Novem- ber 11, 1870. Mrs. SusaAnNAH TEAL died, after a brief illness, Jan- uary 27, 1871. Her husband, Rev. W. Teal, ‘‘ever found her a faithful wife, calm and trusting; a safe counselor, a devoted mother; esteemed and loved by all.” Mrs. Rutu L. Wooprvrr is the last of the long mor- tuary list for this year. She died September 3, 1871. For eight years she worked faithfully with her husband, Rev. W. Woodruff, in the itinerancy, and calmly met her last foe. ANNALS OF 1872. 243 CHAPTER XIII. 1872-3. N the 9th of October, 1872, the Wisconsin Conference QO convened in Division Street Church, Fond du Lac, for its annual session. Twenty years before, we were cordially greeted by the people of this rising city, and held our fifth session there in a much smaller building—the first Methodist church edifice erected in the place. Now we met for our twenty- sixth session—the ecclesiastical year having outstripped the solar, in the ratio of twenty to nineteen. The reader will find the key to this problem in the annals of 1859. Once in the interim the Conference had been enter- tained in that City of Fountains, so this was its third session there. The present church edifice was originally built to propagate a sort of religious latitudinarianism, sometimes called ‘‘ Liberal Christianity ”—liberal, indeed, to almost everything but real Christianity. The building is 50x104 feet. Our people purchased it, and refitted it by adding a basement above ground, containing Sunday-school and class-rooms, all well finished, at a cost of $23,000. The audience-room seats 650, and the orchestra 60. It is now called Division Street Church. About three years after this Conference session, it was graced with a three-thousand- dollar organ. Bishop Gilbert Haven presided over our deliberations for the first and last time. He was elected to the episco- 244 METHODISM IN WISCONSIN. pacy in the month of May, next preceding, and thus was young in the office. Yet his administration was able and satisfactory. In many respects he was a very remarkable man. As a preacher he may not have excelled. As a writer he did. In versatility, scope, and strength of thought, elegance, and even fascination of style, he had few equals. He was a man of strong convictions, and as fearless as John Knox in proclaiming them. For many years he was one of the foremost in the Nation in cham- pioning the rights of the colored race. It is said that as the time for the election of bishops approached in the General Conference, these people held prayer-meetings nightly, and prayed for the election of ‘‘ Massa Haven.” He chose Atlanta, Georgia, as his episcopal residence, and commanded the respect of all fair-thinking people there, as elsewhere, notwithstanding occasional insults offered by the fire-eaters of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. On the third day of January, 1880, he passed very tri- umphantly to his inheritance on high. For the ninth successive year S. Fallows was elected secretary of the Conference—the longest term any one has served us in that capacity. He, being authorized, ap- pointed W. P. Stowe, assistant; E. D. Farnham, record- ing secretary; and 8S. Smith and G. S. Hubbs, statistical secretaries. Soon after the organization of the body it was ordered «that all the proceedings of the Conference be printed in full in the Minutes, and that such printed Minutes, suita- bly bound, shall be sent up to the General Conference as the journal of this Conference.” This new departure was a very sensible one, and if all Annual Conferences would adopt the same, they + would confer a great favor on the General Conference committee that have to examine and report on all their journals during the preceding quadrenuium. ANNALS OF 1872. ~ 245 Among the first things that impressed us in this annual gathering was the fact that five of our ministers, and the wife of another, had passed to their inheritance on the other shore since we last met. Hence, it was fittingly arranged to hold ‘suitable memorial services.” These took place on the fourth day of the session, at which time their memoirs were presented, and the ‘‘ burial service read in a most solemn manner.” Some of us had observed that the omission of prayer at the close of our public services was becoming more fre- quent; so the matter was brought before the Conterence, and with much emphasis it was voted that at such times ‘‘ prayer should seldom, if ever, be omitted.” Probably this action produced good results. Nothing seems more appropriate than to follow the service of preaching the word, and singing the songs of Zion, with an earnest prayer for the divine blessing upon the sacred service. Better leave off five minutes of the most interesting ser- mon, if need be, than to omit this. It is said that the closing prayers of the great Doctor Bunting contributed largely to the effectiveness of his ministry. About this time the observance of Children’s-day was provided for, and the Conference heartily commended it to our people. The report on Education had some features of special interest. Of course the success of our cherished university was, as ever, an important object of solicitude. J. P. Roe had been agent during the year just closed, and had succeeded well, having obtained in cash and in pledges about thirty thousand dollars for the endowment fund. A gracious revival influence also had pervaded the institu- tion, and a considerable number of the students had been converted. Reference has been made to the great fire in Chicago. By that fire the Garrett Biblical Institute—to which our 246 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Conference holds a close relation—lost from its endowment fund about one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, in- vested in buildings in that ill-fated city. But, with great sacrifice on the part of teachers, this ‘‘School of the Prophets” continued. Meanwhile, by the generous as- sistance of friends in other parts of our great country, its heavy loss was partially repaired, and it was moving on with encouraging success. Four of its last graduates had started for mission-work in India. The Scandinavian brethren were moving vigorously to establish a depart- ment in the Institute for the education of their young ministers. The Conference maintained its former position relative to humanitarian and reformatory agencies. A Jaw known as the ‘‘Graham Act,” had been enacted by our State Legislature, intended, probably, to curtail intemperance more than its predecessor. Though not satisfactory to us, we pledged ourselves to its enforcement till we could ob- tain something better. The Conference also gave a scath- ing rebuke to those civil officers who persistently neglect to enforce the laws according to their sworn obligations. The Woman’s Foreign Missionary Society was formally indorsed by the last General Conference, and as heartily approved by ours, at this session, as an agency to accom- plish a work that no other can. The Scandinavian work among us had assumed consid- erable proportions. From a small beginning in 1850, two presiding elders’ districts had been developed among the nationalities comprehended in that name. One of these was connected with the Minnesota Conference, the other with the Wisconsin. Of the pastoral charges be- longing to the latter, one was in Chicago and one in Ey- anston, in the State of Illinois. Meanwhile, also, a Danish-Norwegian Department in the Northwestern University had been established, with. ANNALS OF 1872. 247 great promise of usefulness. Karl Schou was the teacher therein. Just before the hour of service, one Sabbath morning in March, 1872, our church edifice in Appleton was de- stroyed by fire. Though it was a sad sight to see a place rendered dear by so many hallowed associations thus con- sumed, yet perhaps it was a ‘‘ blessing in disguise.” The growing congregation needed a larger place of worship, and, however it might have been but for this fire, all felt the necessity of the immediate erection of a new church. That morning the people met in the college chapel for service, which continued to be their place of worship for several months. The trustees moved promptly, and soon the present beautiful edifice was commenced, the corner- stone of which was laid on the eighth day of October fol- lowing, with appropriate religious services, conducted by Bishop Gilbert Haven. This church will receive further notice hereafter. Thirteen came to us by transfer and readmission; 3 located; 1 withdrew, and 8 were transferred to other Con- ferences. Some of the latter returned to us. Two deserve special notice—A. H. Walter and J. Howd. The former came to us, by transfer, from North Ohio Conference, in 1851. On the division of Conference in 1856, he fell into the West Wisconsin Conference, but in 1865 was transferred to ours, and stationed at Green Bay. He did good work in both Conferences, and died in Kansas, a few months since, after much and prolonged suffering. The latter was received on trial in 1854, and labored successfully in various fields till 1864, when he was appointed missionary to the Oneida Indians. He re- mained there till this year, and did a grand work. His transfer was to Central New York Conference, in which he was very successful, until his health failed. In the winter of 1885 he returned to Wisconsin, and reluctantly 248 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. (on account of feeble health) again took charge of Oneida Mission, but was compelled to desist entirely from work after a little over two years. There was no change in the number or names of the districts ; but in the appointees there were several changes, though only two—C. D. Pillsbury and 8. C. Thomas— retired from the presiding eldership. To Milwaukee, Janesville, Appleton, and Waupaca Districts were assigned, respectively, W. P. Stowe, P. B. Pease, T. C. Willson, and A. J. Mead. The others re- mained. Though this can not be regarded as the most successful year of our history, the reader will see by the appropriate appendices that considerable was done all along the lines of Christian activity. Five preachers were called to their reward during the year. AuRoRA CALENDER was born, October 23, 1778; con- verted in 1818; joined the Pittsburg Conference in 1828 ; came West in 1859, after which time he labored in the Wisconsin and West Wisconsin Conferences until 1863, when he was returned superannuated. While in our Con- ference he was at one time presiding elder of the Norwe- gian District, and in the West Wisconsin Conference he was once in charge of Mineral Point District. Most of the time he was in the pastorate. He was a true man, faithful in his work, and died of typhoid fever, October 23, 1871, in Pinckneyville, Ilinois. TxHos. Wixcox died of pneumonia, near Elkhorn, April 19, 1872, aged sixty-one years. He commenced his min- istry in 1838, in Oneida Conference, New York. In 1856 he was transferred to ours, and did effective work till 1862, when he retired from the active ranks. He lived well and died well, saying to his pastor, about an ANNALS OF 1878. 249 hour before his death, be was learning by experience “the triumph of faith.” Joun Hity was a native of Ireland, born in Belfast, January 14, 1834. In 1855 he joined the North Indiana Conference. In 1868 he was transferred to ours, and ap- pointed to Cotton Street Church, Fond du Lac. His sub- sequent appointments. were Summerfield, Milwaukee, and Bay View. In this latter place he finished his work. On the 30th of April, 1872, he was thrown from a wagon and received an injury that terminated fatally in about twenty hours. E. W. Krrxuam, a native of Wales, came to us by transfer from the Ohio Conference, in 1866, and was sta- tioned successively at Whitewater and Court Street, Janes- ville. In this latter place his health failed. His mind also seemed unbalanced. He died in Minneapolis, Minne- sota, May 2, 1872. Revsen B. Curtiss died May 21, 1872, in Appleton, where he had resided for some time after he retired from the active ministry. He entered the itinerant ministry in Maine, in 1845. In 1862 he came to us, and preached about five years in Janesville and Delavan respectively. He had evidently been a strong man, but his work was mostly done before he came West. Indeed, he ought to have retired from labor much sooner than he did, but his interest in the cause impelled him on. His last at- tempt to preach was in Appleton, in the month of No- vember, 1871, from Revelation vii, 14. He doubtless knows more now of that blood-washed company than he did then. 1873. The General Conference held in Brooklyn, New York, in May, 1872, elected eight bishops—the largest addition to our episcopacy ever made at one time. One of these was S. M. Merrill. At the General Conference of 1868 Zh 250 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. he had distinguished himself as the leader of opposition to the introduction of lay delegates to the highest ecclesias- tical body in our Church until the question was submitted to, and sanctioned by, the Annual Conferences. The plan he advocated was adopted, and resulted as already stated. He was elected editor of the Western Christian Advocate, published in Cincinnati. There he distinguished himself as an able writer and strong defender of evangelical Chris- tianity, as embodied in the doctrines and polity of our Church. It was therefore very natural for the General Conference to regard him as a proper man for a bishop. On the 15th of October, 1873, he appeared as the presi- dent of our Conference, in the city of Whitewater, where we had previously held one session. Henry Colman was elected secretary ; A. Moore, A. A. Hoskins, and E. B. Cummings, assistants; S. Smith, statistical secretary; and M. V. B. Bristol, assistant. Our people in Whitewater had just erected a fine church edifice at a cost of about twenty-five thousand dol- lars. But as it was not quite ready for occupancy, the Congregationalists kindly proffered the use of theirs, and most of the sessions were held there, for which the Con- ference made grateful acknowledgment. Much credit is due the pastor, Rev. C. N. Stowers, for pushing the enterprise so near to completion. But already an embarrassing debt had been incurred, so the preachers had an opportunity to render material aid, which they cheerfully improved. For several months before the Conference began, there was considerable excitement over reported deals in silver- mining stock in the far West. Several had been engaged in them. All but one, however, showed, to the satisfac- tion of the Conference, that their transactions were honorable. The exception was H. 8S. White, who was put on trial, and suspended for one year from the func- tions of the ministry. This is not the place to pass judg- ANNALS OF 1878, 251 ment upon the guilt or innocence of the accused. That was done by a properly constituted tribunal. But it is proper to say that in a state of high excitement it is dif fi- cult to give palliating circumstances due weight. Such may have been the case in this instance. With the exception of this unpleasant matter, this session was quite uneventful. The plan of the work was the same as the preceding year, except that G. C. Haddock succeeded H.S. White as presiding elder on Fond du Lac District. We see very little change for the last two or three years, either in the membership or in the general work of the Churches within our bounds. The Conference maintained its usual firm stand in regard to the great reforms of the day. The Woman’s Foreign Missionary Society was a newly organized agency for conveying the blessings of ihe gospel to heathen women. Though the ‘good tidings of great joy” were designed for ‘‘all people,” yet in parts of the earth, particularly in India, women were as completely shut in from these tidings as if surrounded with walls of adamant as high and impregnable as those of Babylon. The society above named had been in operation in some parts of our country long enough to prove its claim to recognition by the Churches as an important auxiliary to our parent Missionary Society. Within our territory it had been operating only during the preceding year, yet its report of $2,128 evinced a healthy organism, and gave an earnest of the success that has so far attended it. Two transfers came to us from another Conference, and ten were received on trial. Two located—A. P. Allen and C. E. Goldthorp. The former had resided in Colorado for some time, engaged in secular business. He died, a few years since, at an ad- vanced age. The latter soon returned to the Conference 252 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. and is making a good record as an efficient minister of the gospel. THomas Orpison had died. He entered our Confer- ence in 1851, having been a Wesleyan Methodist in Ire- land for several years. With the exception of a temporary location, he continued in the effective ranks till the Con- ference of 1872, when he was placed on the list of super- numeraries. The Conference closed on the 14th of October, and on the 10th of the next month he was called to his reward, with very little premonition of his approach- ing end. He was the first to be buried in the beautiful ‘* Riverside Cemetery,” in Appleton. The reports show a decrease in the aggregate number of ministers, members, and probationers, of forty-three ; but there was a large increase in the benevolences, and an addition of eleven Churches and three parsonages, with an increased valuation of $46,322. A. C. Manwell, who came to us in 1857, by transfer from an Eastern Conference, left us this year by transfer to the Upper Iowa Conference, where he is doing good work as he did with us. E. H. Bronson was transferred to the Minnesota, and G. A. England to Colorado Conference. For ten years the latter had been with us, and had rendered valuable service. Though of a frail constitution, he continued to work on in different lines for several years after his transfer. Mrs. Lypra A. SHEPHERD died October 14, 1873, just the day before our Conference assembled. She is repre- sented as a noble Christian woman, faithfully working with her husband, Rev. 8. V. R. Shepherd, for twenty years in his ministry. Her last hour is described thus: ‘* Being full of confidence in Christ her Savior, she passed away, while a radiance overspread her face as if a view of the excellent glory was given to her as she crossed the river.” Thus she closed her life, loved and esteemed by all. ANNALS OF 1874, 253 CHAPTER XIV. 1874-5. HE twenty-eighth session of our Conference was held in Oshkosh, commencing October 7, 1874, Bishop R. S. Foster presiding. Ten years before, we had met in the same growing city, under the presidency of Bishop Scott. Henry Colman was elected secretary, with 8. Halsey and A. A. Hoskins, assistants. S. Smith, L. N. Wheeler, and G. W. Wells were the statistical secretaries. Soon after the close of the Civil War, emigration began to seriously affect our Churches all through the State. During the war a large draft was made upon them, which greatly retarded progress. Many who returned from the bloody fields had become impressed with the possibilities of the South; hence an attraction, hitherto feeble, became quite potent. Meanwhile the cheap and fertile plains of the West continued to draw the attention of all classes, especially of honest laborers. In addition to these causes, and operating with them in the same direction, was a gen- eral financial crash, which began to be severely felt about this time. Many heavy failures occurred in business circles ; manufacturing institutions suspended or curtailed operations all through the land. Thus thousands were thrown out of employment, and compelled to seek homes in other places. Of course either the South or the West was their only resort. And as our Church was largely represented in this class, it suffered severely from these causes. True, there was an increasingly -large immigration to our State, but the incomers were of many nationalities, few 254 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. of whom were accessible by our agencies. It is, therefore, not strange that we made little advance during these years. Since our last session five had been transferred to other Conferences. Two of these—viz., C.G. Lathrop and Samuel Fallows—deserve a more extended notice than can well be given in these pages. ; The former had been, since 1842, one of our most faithful and reliable workers. He was a man of strong native powers, considerable mental culture, and good preaching ability. No interest committed to his care suffered from neglect. If occasionally he was too straight, as some thought, it was always evident that his conviction of right was the motive power. Since his transfer he has been doing effective work in the Nebraska Conference. The latter, Dr. 8. Fallows, came to us by transfer in 1861, and was stationed successively at Oshkosh, Apple- ton, Summerfield, and Grand Avenue—the last two charges being in Milwaukee. In all of these places he greatly en- deared himself to the people, and took high rank both as a man of fine culture and asan ‘‘able minister of the New Testament.” While in his last pastorate, in 1871, he was appointed State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and served in that important work, by elections, until 1874, when, having been elected to the presidency of the Illi- nois Wesleyan University, he was transfered to the Illinois Conference. In May, 1875, he united with the Reformed Episcopal Church, and became rector of St. Paul’s Church of that denomination in Chicago. On the 15th of July, 1876, he was elected a bishop in that newly formed body, in which office he has continued to increase in popularity and usefulness to the present tite. Jas. Lavelle also had been connected with the Confer- ence for several years. He was received on trial in 1860, had succeeded fairly well, and was transferred to the New Jersey Conference. ANNALS OF 1874. 255 T. E. Webb came to us by transfer at the last Confer- ence, and in the interim had secured a transfer to the Northwest Indiana Conference. O. P. Peterson had been in the Norwegian work since 1869, and was transferred to the New York East Conference. In the annals of last year, mention was made of the suspension of H. S. White. At this session a long com- munication was received from him, severely criticising the action of the Conference in his case. He was allowed to locate, but was justly rebuked by the adoption of the following resolution : “ Resolved, That the communication received from Rev. H. S. White, and read before the Conference, is untrue in some of its statements, unjust in its insinuations, and of such a character as not to be allowed to pass without dis- approval.” : On the Sabbath, Bishop Foster preached a very able sermon from Acts x, 48. He presented a strong, logical, and convincing chain of argument showing that ‘‘ Jesus was the Christ.” The next day the Conference requested its publication. The bishop is a remarkable man. Before he was thirty years of age he had a newspaper controversy with Dr. Rice, an Old-school Presbyterian Doctor of Divinity, of Cincinnati, in which city he also was a pastor. His articles were afterwards embodied in a book entitled, ‘‘ Objections to Calvinism.” It is the most complete refutation of Old- school Calvinism known to the writer. When elected to the episcopacy in 1872, he was a professor in Drew Theo- logical Seminary. But with all his ability, there was some- thing for him to learn in his new office, as the following incident will show: In his address, just before reading the appointments, he told us that he had been for several days in a focus, at which all possible rays of light had coucen- trated, as to matters pertaining to the appointments. But 256 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. only a few minutes after adjournment “ rays of light,” en- tirely unanticipated, began to pour upon him, and he felt compelled to change some of the appointments. The reports of the usual committees did not contain anything specially new. They showed a firm adherence to principles and work already described in these pages. There was one, however, on a subject not before included in our list. It was on ‘‘ Fraternal Relations.” It was designed to promote harmony between different denominations, especially in places where there seems to be a call for but one. Our Conference was the first to appoint a fraternal delegate, and invite other religious bodies to do the same. It was also the first to move in this matter. It is a little remarkable that none left us by transfer at this session, though five, as already stated, had thus been removed since our previous session. Six came to us by readmission and transfer, and six- teen were received on trial. The effective ministerial force was 155, of which three were missionaries to Denmark, and fourteen to Norway. There was no change in the districts, and but two changes in their incumbents—A. J. Mead followed C. G. Haddock on Fond du Lac District, and Geo. Fellows, Mr. Mead on Waupaca District. The year was not one of marked success. Only three new church edifices were reported, and these of small dimensions. Our Church property at Neenah, however, was greatly improved by the sale of a small edifice and the purchase of a much larger one. This has been im- proved from time to time, and is now a very commodious house of worship. It will seat three hundred to four hun- dred people, and is valued at $6,000. The parsonage there is valued at $1,500, and we have a living, active membership. ANNALS OF 1875, 257 1875. This year, for the third time, Racine was favored with our Conference session, commencing on the thirteenth day of October. ‘‘Favored?” Yes. The presence of a hun- dred and fifty ministers in any place for a week, reporting their work and planning for another year’s campaign, ought to be a benediction; and from the way our people welcume us the second, third, or fourth time, we have rea- son to suppose they so regard it. At this Conference Bishop I. W. Wiley presided. Like the three that next preceded him, he was elected to the episcopacy in 1872. Previous to this he had honored the Church as a medical missionary in China four years; as principal of Pennington Seminary, New Jersey, five years; and as editor of the Ladies’ Repository (now superseded by the Methodist Maga- zine), four years. Though young in his present office, he had already evinced a creditable adaptation to it. The secretaries were the same as the previous year, with one exception—P. W. Peterson took the place of L. N. Wheeler. It seems unnecessary to detail the proceedings of the body relative to the various lines of work on which it had been operating, as they were so similar to those of several successive years in the past. It is noteworthy, however, that no diminution of earnestness was discernible. A very sinfular case of ministerial defection had come to light during the year. J. M. Craig, who had been or- dained an “elder in the Church of God” at our last an- nual session, was soon after reported guilty of stealing books at different times, and on a pretty large scale. At this Conference he was tried, and expelled from the min- istry and membership of the Methodist Episcopal Church. In defense he pleaded “ kleptomania ;” that is, a species of insanity that so impels one to steal that he is not responsi- 258 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ble for his acts in stealing. The committee, however, who adjudicated the case—fifteen in number, with G. M. Steele as chairman, very competent men—were not convinced that he was a kleptomaniac. In their view, there was every in- dication of a long-continued disposition to steal, which he had cultivated, just as all thieves do. This sad case is dismissed with the remark that it nearly wrecked one of our best pastoral charges. O. B. Thayer and Moses Alley withdrew from the connection at this Conference. The former came to us a few years before from the Protestant Episcopal Church, and, as has too often been done by us with men we know not, was appointed to a very important charge, and advanced to those still more so for several years, being held up by the strength of the Churches he served, until he finally— collapsed. The latter was received on trial in 1864. He might have succeeded well had he given a few years to study before entering the work. But he was nearly ruined by flaitery in his early itinerant ministry. He failed to meet the expectations he at first awakened. Both of these entered the ministry of the Congregational Church; but succeeded no better than with us. E. D. Huntley was transferred to the West Wisconsin Conference, and W. W. Case to the Cincinnati Conference, where he is doing very effective work, as he did with us. Mr. Huntley will come to view again in connection with our educational interests. . One of our number, W. W. Warner, had died. ‘«¢EKleven years he had been a member of the Erie Confer- ence, and then came by transfer to ours, where he labored for about four and a half years. His ministry was marked with unusual success. It is believed that more than one thousand souls were converted as the direct and immediate result of his ministry, covering a period of less than seven- teen years.” ANNALS OF 1875, 259 Seven were added to our ranks by transfer, and eight were received on trial. Our lists of supernumeraries and superannuates had be- come very large, the former seven, the latter thirty-one. Our people at Racine were burdened with a heavy debt, incurred in the erection of a new house of worship. So the preachers at this Conference, as at Whitewater two years before, had an opportunity to materialize their liber- ality. Unfortunately, much injudicious management had attended the enterprise. It was attributed to the pastor, by whose influence the contract for building was let to irre- sponsible parties from abroad, which resulted in a loss of several thousand dollars, and a poorly built edifice. This produced great disaffection, not only in the membership of the Church, but with responsible resident contractors, and thus shut off the sympathy, to a considerable extent, of those without. This church was greatly needed. It was located on the corner of Eighth and Main Streets—a very eligible site. The cost of the ground was $3,250, that of the organ $3,500, and that of the building itself $35,850. It was dedicated on the first Sabbath in July, 1871. Its seating capacity was nine hundred. Six other churches were erected during the year where none had previously existed. The reader will see their locations in Appendix I. In short, there was a fair advance on all the lines of Christian work. 260 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER XV. 1876-7. \ AUPACA was the seat of our Conference in 1876. It being a small city, and our numbers having in- creased, some doubted whether our people could entertain us without embarassment. But they gave us a royal wel- come. Indeed, the whole community seemed interested, and cordially assisted in making us ‘feel at home.” Our session was evidently a blessing to the place, and to the Conference as well. For years all that region had been supplied mostly by young men, and scarcely one of the older members of our Conference were willing to go there. It was not only the frontier, but was known as the ‘Indian land,” and, for some reason, was not so attractive as Oklahoma is now. Much of the prejudice against it was probably removed by personal observation. On the 4th of October the Conference was called to order by Bishop Thomas Bowman. He was one of the eight elected at the General Conference of 1872. At the time of his election he was president of Indiana Asbury University. The secretaries were the same as the year before. Thus organized, the Conference proceeded to its usual work. Methodism was introduced here in a somewhat early day. The place appears first as a pastoral charge in 1851, and at the next Conference a new church edifice was reported. It was a plain wooden building, well suited to the time Rev. STEPHEN SMITH. Rev. €. D PILLSBURY, A. M. Rev. HENRY SEWELL, Rev. C W. GALLAGHER, D. D. ANNALS OF 1876. 261 and place. The one in which we met this year was begun in May, 1874, and dedicated in February, 1875. It is 80x30 feet in size, with a transept on each side, and will seat about three hundred people. It is a brick building, with good architectural proportions, and cost $10,000. The entire Church property here, including a parsonage, is valued this year at $13,500. One member, C. R. Chapin, who had proved to be “unacceptable” to the people—really a failure as a preacher—was located without his request. This was in accordance with a rule of Discipline authorizing an Annual Conference to thus do with any member who is adjudged to be unacceptable in the sense above indicated. Early in the Conference session we find the following action: ‘‘A. E. Wanlass, seconded by L. N. Wheeler and G. M. Steele, offered the following resolutions, which, after some remarks by Dr. Edwards, were adopted: ‘“Wuereas, Section 2, Article H, of the Constitution of the Conference Missionary Society is comparatively a dead letter, being inoperative during the interim of Con- ferences; “Resolved, That the officers and managers of the Con- ference Missionary Society be, ex officio, a committee to ar- range for and assist in getting up anniversaries and such other exercises as shall be deemed necessary and effective in securing the success contemplated in the organization of the Society. ‘« Resolved, That the presiding elders and pastors through- out the Conference recognize this committee as such, and co-operate with them.” This surely augured great advance in this line of work, and especially so as two of the movers of the resolutions were returned missionaries from foreign fields, and leading officers (president and secretary) of the society. But for some reason the resolutions, if not ‘‘ comparatively a dead letter,” 262 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. did not accomplish what they were intended to. There was, indeed, an advance in the collections the following year. though they did not reach the amount of some former years. Nor were the ‘‘anniversaries,” etc., inaugurated to any considerable extent, if at all. But why may not this, or something similar, become a part of our missionary work every year? The Conference continued its cordial approval of the Woman’s Foreign Missionary Society. Mrs. Dr. Steele was the president of that society in our Conference. A proposition came from the General Conference to so alter the ‘Second Restrictive Rule” of our Church con- stitution as to allow that body to make the basis of repre- sentation one to every ninety-nine members of Annual Conferences, other provisions of the Rule remaining un- changed. This received the unanimous vote of the Con- ference. On another proposition from the same source, to alter the ‘‘ Third Restrictive Rule,” so as to give each Confer- ence authority to determine the number of districts they will have —‘‘ Provided, no Conference shall have less than two nor more than eight districts; nor shall any district have more than sixty pastoral charges”—the Conference voted 51 in favor, and 46 against. Our educational interests were carefully looked after ; bor were any other lines of work neglected. The uni- versity, that had been from the first a cherished child, still needed care. From a lack of adequate endowment, and the failure of certain parties to meet their pledges, it be- came so embarrassed that this Conference decided to ap- peal to the Churches for aid by special collections. Though the necessity of this ought not to have existed, the appeal was eminently just. The institution had furnished the Churches with twenty ministers, and sent back to them many of their sons and daughters with renewed lives and ANNALS OF 1876, 260 cultured minds. The Church therefore owed the college more than a debt of gratitude. A strong report from the ‘‘ Committee on Temperance and Tobacco,” of which W. H. Thompson was chairman, and H. Sewell secretary, was adopted. In it we find the following: ‘‘ The existence of 980,000 drones in our na- tional hive; the example of 750,000 regular drunkards ; the incubus of 800,000 paupers; the tears of 200,000 orphans bedewing the graves of 65,000 victim-fathers ; the ravings of 30,000 maniacs; the crimes of 200,000 criminals in our jails; the ignorance of 2,000,000 children, debarred from our public schools; a host of women chaiued by solemn vows to the rotting carcasses of sottish and brutal men; and an army of recruits, consisting of 1,000,- 000 young men, under drill for the drunkard’s degradation and doom, cry aloud to the Christian Church to help heal this festering sore, and drain the land of this Dead Sea of crime, heart-breaks, poverty, widowhood, orphanage, idiocy, madness, delirium, and death.” Then follow three resolutions pledging continued activity in driving this scourge from the land. After a few earnest words relative to the use of tobacco ‘‘in the ministry and membership,” two resolutions follow, not lacking in per- pendicularity of sentiment. Here they are: “Resolved, That we will continue to associate the use of tobacco with the vice of intemperance, and enter our com- plete protest against its use by the ministry of our Confer- ence and the membership of our Church. “‘Resolved, That we will hereafter refuse to receive into our Conference, either on trial or into full conncction, any one who uses tobacco. As early as 1857 the Conference passed resolutions substantially the same as the last; but after nearly twenty years of trial we were ready to reaffirm our de- termination. 264 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. As good as this report was, one important thing was omitted; viz., the use of alcoholic wine in the eucharist. We had years before recommended ‘that stewards take pains always to provide the pure, unfermented juice of the grape, and never the fermented wine in common use.” But -this ‘‘ recommend” had not accomplished the desired end; so at this Conference a resolution was presented and passed pledging our own action, viz. : “* Resolved, That we will make special efforts to have our Churches procure and use only the unfermented juice of the grape in the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper.” At this Conference two that had been in our ranks in other years returned by transfer. One, F. S. Stein, was readmitted, having been a member of a Western Confer- ence; and eight were received on trial. William Averill and C. R. Chapin were located—the latter as already described. Mr. Averill entered our work in 1852, and though in the local ranks several years dur- ing the interim, he did good service while in the Confer ence. His name now appears in our Minutes for the last time. Edrick Holmes, after giving several years to our work with fair success, withdrew from the Church. L. F. Moutrnrop ‘‘rested from his labors” in April next preceding the present session. The reader will re- member him as one of our heroic pioneers. He entered our work in 1840, and for several years was very success- ful on Racine, Troy, and Prairieville (mow Waukesha) Circuits. In failing health he located, not being willing to become a burden to the Conference for so few years of service. He recuperated, was employed at different times to fill vacancies, and in 1859 was readmitted. For several of his last years he was on the list of superannuates. John Haw, a promising young man, was transferred to the West Wisconsin Conference; and fifteen Norwegians, ANNALS OF 1877, 265 who had been for some time missionaries to their native land, were transferred to the newly formed Conference there. Among these was C. Willerup, the father of the Norwegian work in Wisconsin. He will receive further notice in the account of that work. For a year or two our advance has been very moderate. Four changes occurred this year among the presiding elders. W. G. Miller was appointed to Milwaukee Dis- trict, W. P. Stowe to Janesville District, J. W. Carhart to Appleton District, and J. H. Johnson to the Norwegian District. 1877. The Conference met this year in Waupun, on the eleventh day of October. Many years before we accepted an invitation to hold the following session there; but by some special effort the motion fixing that as the place of meeting the next year was reconsidered, and the Confer- ence voted to meet in another place. It is probable the people of Waupun deemed this rather unkind treatment; so it seemed to some of the preachers, at least. We were cordially received and well entertained, though a large number of the preachers found themselves in the State Penitentiary, and some even in the cells before the session closed. Yet they did not deem their incarceration there a punishment. Bishop Jesse T. Peck presided at this Conference. He was the sixth in succession of the eight elected to the epis- copacy in 1872 that had come to us officially. Like all our bishops he was very prominent before election to this office. He was an influential member of the Black River (now Northern New York) Conference when the writer en- tered that body a half century ago. He was then principal of the Gouverneur Wesleyan Seminary. In the educational field he was subsequently principal of the Troy Conference Seminary and president of Dickinson College. He after- 22 266 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE, wards spent several years in California, doing heroic work. At his elevation to the episcopacy he was pastor of Uni- versity Avenue Church, in Syracuse, where he aided, by his enlarged experience, and otherwise, in fuunding the Syracuse University, one of the most important institu- tions of the kind in our denomination. The secretaries of the last two sessions were all re-elected. At some time in the Conference 1844-5, Joseph Lewis, in charge of Fond du Lac Circuit, had visited this place and formed a class of six members—all belonging to the Miller family, the youngest of whom was Wesson G., who after- wards became prominent in our ministerial ranks. A house of worship there was first reported in 1854. This had been lengthened once or twice, making its length and width out of proper proportion. It had now fallen far behind the growing demands of the place. At this Conference two were transferred to us, and three received on trial—the smallest addition to our ministerial force for many years. One located, one had died, and two were transferred to other Conferences. Thus we entered upon the work of the next year with very little change in our active ranks. H. H. Jones was the one referred to as located. He was a true man, but did not, for the few years he was with us, take high rank. Evcene I. Avuine, who died on the 24th of August of this year, had been connected with the Conference less than three years. He was a man of earnest piety, and, had his life and health been spared, would doubtless have accomplished much for the Master. His death was more than peaceful. His obituary, as published in the Minutes, closes thus: ‘‘ He longed for rest; and the happy, peace- ful look that settled upon his dead face told of a joyful entering into ‘the rest that remaineth to the people of God.’” ANNALS OF 1877. 267 The wives of four of the preachers died during the year. Mrs. I. M. Wurre, whose husband was in his second year of probation in the Conference, passed peacefully to her rest, April 2, 1877, in the twenty-third year of her age. Thus early was a promising life of usefulness terminated. In contrast to hers, in point of years, was the death of Mrs. Rev. AsaHEL Moore, who died March 9, 1877, aged fifty-eight years, about forty of which had been given to our itinerant work, with her husband, in Maine and Wis- consin, when the Master said, ‘‘Come up higher.” All ac- counts represent her as a noble woman and an active Christian. Mrs. IsapeLLa H. B. WALKER closed her work after a sojourn on earth of nearly thirty-seven years, a life with God of about twenty-three years, several of which were in the itinerant work with her husband, Rev. T. H. Walker. She was a devoted Christian, and ‘‘ died well,” in full pros- pect of ‘‘home, home, home,” which she uttered three times just before she departed. Mrs. Jane E. Carpenter, wife of Rev. C. E. Carpen- ter, an honored member of Wisconsin Conference, is the last whose death is this year recorded. During her hus- band’s absence at the last Conference she was attacked with typhoid fever, but, after a while, so far recovered as to be thought able to move to the new pastoral charge, to which he had been assigned. It was, however, too hard a strain on her enfeebled system, and, on the 16th of De- cember, 1876, she succumbed to the great destroyer, in Palmyra, at the age of forty-one. The year seems to have been marked with at least or- dinary prosperity, there being an increase of 639 in the membership, and of $936 in the benevolent collections. 268 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER XVI. 1878-9. N the second day of October, 1878, the Wisconsin Conference convened at Fort Atkinson, with Bishop Foster as president. The organization was completed by the election of the same secretaries as had served for the three next preceding sessions. Fort Atkinson is a fine town on Rock River, perhaps sixty miles from its source. For several years of our early history it was a point in the old Aztalan Circuit. It thus continued until 1854, when that honored name, Aztalan, that had been in our Minutes since 1837, gave place to Lake Mills and Fort Atkinson, and ceased to indicate the head of a pastoral charge. The first class was formed here by Rev. H. W. Frink, in the Conference year 1839-40, in the house of Jesse Roberts, a little west of the present site of the town.* The church was commenced in 1850, and soon completed. The parsonage was built in 1865. The church property has been improved at different times, and the place ranks well with our Conference appointments. We did not find an embarrassing debt here, as at some other places; but a very urgent appeal for relief on this score came to us from Oshkosh. A few years before, the First Methodist Episcopal Church there had purchased a large building, in process of erection, commenced for an opera-house. The pastor, Dr. J. W. Carhart, found it * Its jubilee was celebrated January 19-26, 1890. ANNALS OF 1878. 269 could be procured at a very reasonable rate, and became deeply interested in securing it for a sanctuary. The growing Church and congregation needed something of the kind. He therefore moved promptly in the matter, aod induced the trustees to purchase it. Some thought this movement was too hasty. This has been a stereotyped ery, when the ‘‘Lord’s house is to be built,” since the days of Haggai. Others, who preferred to have it the devil’s play-house, clamored against the undertaking. Others still, who were every way well disposed toward the enter- prise, feared it could not be accomplished. Altogether, therefore, it was entered upon with fearful odds against success. A few, however, were confident that they were well able to ‘“‘go up and possess it;” and so they were, had there been more Calebs and Joshuas. The church was finished; but for lack of anticipated co-operation, a heavy debt hung over it on the day of dedication. Hopes were entertained of clearing it of embarrassment on that occasion. But a few days before the appointed time for that service arrived, a sweeping fire destroyed a large por- tion of the city; just missing the new church, however, yet laying in ashes the homes of many of its friends, thus greatly increasing the difficulty of providing for the pay- ment of the debt. After struggling under this for some time, the trustees sought the advice of the Conference. The matter was thoroughly canvassed, and some severe criti- cisms were made, evidently intended to bear on Dr. Car- hart. Of the two who were the most liberal with this kind of help, one had never distinguished himself in any church- building enterprise; the other had led a church into about as great an embarrassment for an edifice that proved almost a failure. But the Conference generally felt a deep sym- pathy with the brethren who so heroically battled with ad- verse circumstances. The result of the canvass was an arrangement to apply to the Churches throughout the 270 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Conference for aid. We shall see hereafter how it suc- ceeded. Another Macedonian ery came from the Garrett Bib- lical Institute. The great Chicago fire of 1871 and the ‘hard times” had so reduced for the time its resources, that, after paying insurance, taxes, etc., it had not ‘‘one dollar of income.” Yet ‘upwards of one hundred young men,” says the appeal, ‘‘are now applying for instruction. The faculty say: ‘Paid or not paid, these men can not be turned away.’” Small as were the salaries of some of the preachers, all had received something; so they pledged $538.92 to aid in running this ‘‘ School of the Prophets.” What a contrast between such public institutions and individuals! When unaveidable calamities come upon the former, sympathy is awakened and needed aid is rendered. This is well. When similar things come to individuals, they must not only bear them alone, but often be subjected , to stinging criticism. The plan of the work was slightly changed. The Nor- wegian District, being divided, thus formed two, called Chicago Norwegian District, in charge of J. H. Johnson ; and Milwaukee Norwegian District, of which O. P. Peterson was presiding elder. A. J. Mead and George Fellows having completed their full terms on Fond du Lac and Waupaca Districts, respectively, L. N. Wheeler succeeded the former, and J. M. Walker the latter. No special departure from usual methods of work is discernible in the reports of this year. On all questions of reform and benevolent operations the Conference main- tained its former erect position. An extract from a pre- siding elder’s report of his district, incorporated in the report on Temperance, is worthy of serious thought. It is this: ‘‘T have found by careful calculation that, could the ANNALS OF 1878, 271 money be saved for the Lord that is spent for tobacco by the members of the Church on my district, I could pay the presiding elder’s salary, make up the deficiencies on the preacher’s claims, put a good library into every Sun- day-school in the district, and have a handsome sum to send abroad for missions.” If this be an accurate estimate, and a fair specimen of other districts, Heaven pity us! Death had been doing its work during the year. Three preachers, and the wives of four others of our Conference, had fallen by his power. Isaac WILTSE, whose name first appears in our Min- utes in 1859, was called to his reward, March 30th of this year, in the forty-second year of his age, and in the nine- teenth of his itinerant ministry. . He died at Ripon, being the third pastor of our Church there that had been taken from it in like mafner. From the first his ministry was characterized with diligence, prudence, and success. He was appointed to Ripon in 1876, one year after the Con- ference disposed of the Craig case, while the elements were yet in a very unsettled state. But by skillful management for a year and a half they were rapidly growing harmoni- ous. Though he was facing death in triumph, the inter- ests of his people burdened his soul; and a little before his departure he charged his presiding elder thus: ‘‘ Take care of my work.” Few more valuable men have ever passed from our ranks. Wiu1am Sarorr was transferred to our Conference from Ohio in 1850, and for ten years did effective service, when he was compelled by personal and family illness to retire from the field. He remained in a superannuate relation until his death May 5, 1877, his wife, after suffer- ing much, having gone a few years before. As he resided beyond our Conference bounds, we knew little of him 272 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. during the years of superannuation. But all reports were favorable. Exvisan P. Beecner was received on trial in the Oneida Conference, New York, in 1840, and in 1855 was transferred to ours. With the exception of about a year and a half he did effective work till 1869, when he was placed on the list of superannuates, where he remained till his death in Beaver Dam, November 3, 1877. He was a true man, an earnest worker, a fair preacher, and highly respected. Mary E. Otrn, wife of Rev. S. A. Olin, died of malignant diphtheria in April, 1878, in Hortonville, where her husband was in pastoral work. In 1871 ber husband commenced his work in our Conference. She had many fears that she should not be competent to the position of a minister's wife. But all accounts say she had already become a very useful worker in that rélation, and was con- stantly improving. She died well. A little before the last summons came she said: ‘‘I have been wonderfully filled with the presence of the Lord, as a preparation for this hour, to enable me to get a complete victory. I have been down to the brink of the river; the waters were not dark, for Jesus was with me there.” Lypra F. Farreanks, wife of Rev. C. J. Fairbanks, closed her earthly life August 8, 1878, in the fifty-seventh year of her age. For many years her health was frail, but she would not consent to have her husband locate on ac- count of it. ‘‘ Near the closing scene, as a friend sang, ‘I know I am nearing the holy ranks Of friends and kindred dear,’ she exclaimed, ‘Glory! Glory! Glory! How bright it looks on the other shore!’” Frances M. Peep passed to her inheritance, March 30, 1878, her husband, Rev. Thomas Peep, being in charge of ANNALS OF 1879, 273 Pleasant Prairie Circuit. She rendered valuable assist- ance, aud was universally esteemed. Among her last words were, ‘‘ All the bells of heaven are ringing a welcome to me.” CaarLotte Ror was born in England, March 31, 1824, became the wife of J. P. Roe, January 5, 1848, and died May 23,1878. Both she and her husband were mem- bers of the Church of England. In 1857 they united with the Methodist Episcopal Church. The latter afterwards became a member of Wisconsin Conference. She was a most estimable lady and a devout Christian. Our ministry this year was re-enforced by six transfers and readmissions, and nine receptions on trial. But as three had died, two located, and three were transferred to other Conferences, the increase was but seven. The reports show a general advance in numbers, benevo- lences, church edifices, parsonages, and pastoral charges. W. R. Jones, who left us by transfer, had been a success- * ful minister among us since 1860, and is still doing good work in Nebraska. 1879. For the fourth time in the history of Wisconsin Con- ference our session -this year was held in Milwaukee. But the reader may remember that in 1844 the Rock River Conference met there, while Methodism in Wisconsin was under its care. The session now in consideration commenced in Grand Avenue Church, October 1st, Bishop E. G. Andrews pre- siding. The society worshiping here is the oldest in the city. It was formed in the summer of 1836. The little band— the only Protestant organization in the place—held serv- ices wherever it was most convenient, until after the ar- rival of L. S. Kellogg, in December next following. He 23 274 ; WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. soon built a carpenter-shop for himself, which also was used as a place of worship for the society for a year or more. On the 28th of May, 1841, their first church edi- fice, already described, was dedicated. They occupied this until 1848, when they moved into a much more capacious one, on the corner of West Water and Spring (now Grand Avenue) Streets. -On the 14th of January, 1854, this was consumed by fire. For about nine months the society wor- shiped in Young’s Hall, on Wisconsin Street. In October, 1854, they rented, and soon after purchased, the Free Congregational church, on the corner of Spring and Second Streets, which was also burned, July 4, 1861. Thus the society was subjected to other removals. After their de- molished structure was rebuilt, they occupied it until, for lack of needed room, they provided for themselves their present well-arranged temple, which they began to occupy October 8, 1871. Notwithstanding they were pinched with poverty, pursued by fire, and driven from place to place, they never lost heart, nor ceased to be an active, aggressive Church, loyal to every part of Methodism, though not par- tial to the kind of itinerancy they had been compelled to practice. Bishop Andrews appeared among us for the first time. He was one of the eight elected to the episcopacy in 1872, and the seventh one of that number that visited us officially. He made a very fine impression, fully sustain- ing the high reputation he had before earned. At the time of his election he was pastor of the Seventh Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church, Brooklyn, New York, though he had spent many years in the educational field before entering upon pastoral work. H. Colman had been for six successive years principal secretary, and, for the last four, A. A. Hoskins and 8. Halsey had been his assistants; Stephen Smith, G. W. Wells, and P. W. Peterson had also been statistical secre- ANNALS OF 1879, 275 taries for four years. They were all re-elected, at this session, to the same positions. Little of the usual routine business of the Conference demands special notice. J. W. McCormie was transferred to us from Indiana Conference, and R. W. Bosworth was returned by transfer from Colorado, whence he had gone a few years before. Ten were received on trial. J. Jones located; G. M. Steele, M. Evans, W. H. Thompson, and A. Hollington were transferred to other Conferences. 8. L. Leonarp and H. C. Tivron were removed by death. The last-named began his itinerant ministry in 1841, under the care of the Maine Conference, and served in that and the East Maine Conference sixteen years. In 1857 he located, not to leave the work, but to enter some Conference in the West. He was readmitted into our Conference a few months after, of which he continued a prominent and an honored member until he was called to his inheritance on high, March 26,1879. He served some of our best stations, was presiding elder on Janesville and Racine Districts. About the middle of his term on the former he accepted a chaplaincy in the Thirteenth Regiment of Wisconsin Volunteers, but was compelled, by injured health, to resign before the Rebellion was crushed. He also served one term in the Wisconsin Legislative As- sembly, where his influence was felt in opposing some po- litical chicanery. For several months toward the close of life, he had unusual manifestations of the divine presence, and of the power of Christ to save to the uttermost. Writ- ing to the last Conference before his death, he said: ‘** Dear BretareN—This has been a hard-fought bat- tle; but it is not without its blessed results. It has been the best year of my life, spiritually. The majesty and power of Christ Jesus have been gloriously revealed to me. 276 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. His tender love and faithfulness have been inexpressible sweetness to me. The blood of Christ saves me from the love, the pollution, the power, and practice of sin. The fullness of joy and peace can fill the soul of one, though burdened with weakness, ignorance, and disease. Death is conquered ; the grave is conquered; devils and hell are conquered. Amen! amen!” It is not strange, after such experiences,.that he whis- pered, as life was ebbing out: ‘‘I am ready, through the blood of the Lamb.” 8. L. Leonarp entered our ranks in 1850. He was faithful to his work, very studious, and for a time was considered a very promising young minister; but from feebleness of health, which grew upon him and assumed a nervous form, or from other causes, he did not meet the expectation of his friends. It is well said in his obituary that he ‘‘was a man of strong convictions, and never swerved from any course which he believed to be right.” For many years he was on the superannuate list. He bore with great patience the extreme suffering that at- tended the closing weeks of his life, and ‘his soul tri- umphed gloriously in Christ, his all-sufficient Savior.” As last year, so this, several of the preachers were be- reft of their wives. These may here be noted. Mrs. Saran K. Sampson died in Appleton, September 23, 1879, just a few days before the Conference began. She was the third wife of our much esteemed and venerated brother, W. H. Sampson. Though a member of the Prot- estant Episcopal Church, she seems to have entered as heartily into work with her husband as could be ex- pected. She is represented as a noble woman and sincere Christian. Mrs. Harriet AnN ANDERSON, wife of Rev. W. M. Anderson, died September 20th—three days before Mrs. Sampson—in Kansas. She was an earnest worker in ANNALS OF 1879, 277 various lines of Christian activity, and died exclaiming, ‘Jesus is precious now!” CATHERINE E. Coox, wife of C. D. Cook, for some time an active member of our Conference, now superannu- ated, died at Eagle Lake Station, Minnesota, May 16, 1879. She is represented as an earnest Christian woman. “‘She died as she lived so many years, in the Lord.” We can not close the annals of this year without hon- orable mention of Dr. Geo. M. Steele. In June, 1865, he was elected to the presidency of Lawrence University, and entered upon its duties at the beginning of the next academic year, in the September following. He filled the position for fourteen years with marked success, and won the respect of scholars and educators throughout the State. We parted with him reluctantly, but with the best wishes for his success as principal of Wilbraham Acad- emy, Massachusetts, the oldest institution of learning in American Methodism. He is still at that post of honor. We miss his manly form, benignant words, and healthful influence. The other brethren who left us by transfer, had done good service for several years. The reports show an increase of members in full con- nection among the laity, but a decrease of probationers. A decided advance was made in the benevolences and in Church edifices. The list of appointments shows no change in the in- cumbents of the districts; but there was one made soon after the close of the session, which will be noticed in an- other place. This year closes the connection of the Norwegian work with our Conference. The General Conference that met in the May following placed it in a Conference by itself. It will receive further notice in Part IV of this volume. 278 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. L. N. Wheeler, W. P. Stowe, O. J. Cowles, and J. H. Johnson were elected delegates to the General Con- ference of 1880; and A. J. Mead and Henry Colman re- serves. The lay delegates were Robert McMillen and Z. P. Burdick, with E. L. Grant and R. P. Elmore as reserves. ANNALS OF 1880, 279 CHAPTER XVII. 1880-1. PPLETON was this year for the third time the seat of Wisconsin Conference. Bishop William L. Harris opened the session on the 13th of October, and presided over our deliberations. He was one of the eight so often referred to in the annals of recent years, and the last with whose presidency we were favored. He was in various ways a remarkable man. For several years he had been a professor in the Ohio Wesleyan University. He stood high in the esteem of the North Ohio Conference, of which he was a member, and was chosen as one of their representatives to the General Con- ference held in Indianapolis in May, 1856. By a large majority he was elected secretary of that body. This brought him into prominence before the Church at large— especially so, as he proved peculiarly adapted to that im- portant position. He was re-elected at each General Con- ference till that of 1872 inclusive, when he was elevated to the episcopacy. For twelve years also previous to the last date he was one of the secretaries of the Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church. He had great physical endurance, and was ‘‘in labors abundant” in every position he occupied. In 1868 he said to the writer and others: ‘‘If J] know what you mean by tired, I never had the sensation.” S. Halsey, who had been assistant secretary for six suc- cessive years, was this year elected principal; and J. W. 280 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. McCormack and J. R. Creighton, assistants. The statistical secretaries for the last four years were re-elected. In the annals of 1872 allusion is made to a new church in process of erection in this city, to take the place of one then recently consumed by fire. In this finished edifice the Conference held its present session. It is a massive brick structure, of good architectural proportions. The audi- torium is richly frescoed, furnished with a fine organ, and will seat about seven hundred people. In the basement are five rooms, capable of being thrown into one by sliding doors, and is thus well fitted for effective Church-work. It is valued at $37,000. A parsonage near is valued at $4,000. This was probably the most unpleasant session in our history. Undesirable as it is to review the circumstances that made it so, they can not be ignored by a faithful his- torian—so public were they and so far-reaching in their influence. Several months before, Rev. George C. Had- dock wrote an ‘‘ Open Letter,” which appeared in a secular journal, charging Rev. Dr. J. W. Carhart with very grave offenses, and declaring his readiness to sustain them with proof. Dr. Carhart promptly signified his readiness to meet them, and at his request a ‘‘ Committee of Inquiry” was summoned, according to the law of the Church in such cases. After a rigid investigation for several days, the com- mittee failed to find cause for a trial. Formal charges were prepared against him at this Conference by Mr. Haddock, and the case went to a committee of fifteen for trial, proper. This committee rendered a verdict of guilty, and J. W. Car- hart was declared ‘‘ expelled from the ministry and mem- bership of the Methodist Episcopal Church.” He appealed to a ‘ Judicial Conference,” as also provided by our ecclesi- astical law in such cases.. This body reversed the decision of the lower court, and restored him to membership in the Church and in the ministry. ANNALS OF 1880, 281 A bill of charges was also presented to the Conference against Rev. G. C. Haddock, by Rev. R. J. Judd, based mainly on the very improper way in which he had assailed Dr. Carhart. Before the committee were ready to call him to answer to these charges, he wrote a confession to the Con- ference, in which, after affirming his conviction of the truth of the allegations of the ‘“‘ Open Letter” at the time it was written, he said: ‘‘ In view of all facts and circumstances, I now say that I regret the publication of the ‘ Open Letter’ as an unwise and imprudent act, and I cast myself upon the unfailing love of my dear brethren, whom I have ever found, in a Conference acquaintance of twenty years, to be unsur- passed in charitable kindness and tender consideration.” These matters created a very unpleasant atmosphere ; for not all believed that Dr. Carhart had been justly treated. The reader will remember that we took leave of the venerable Dr. Steele at our last Conference. Dr. E. D. Huntley, of the West Wisconsin Conference, was elected to succeed him in the presidency of our cherished ‘‘ Law- rence.” He was duly installed at the Commencement, in June, 1879. During the year just closed he had devoted much of his time to soliciting financial aid for the college. According fo the report of the Committee on Education, he had thus secured ‘‘about $12,000 for current ex- penses ;” and the institution ‘‘once more was proclaimed out of debt.” The outlook seemed in all respects to be encouraging. So also it was with Garrett Biblical Insti- tute. It was fast emerging from its heavy “ financial em- barrassment,” caused by the great fire of 1871. The Conference expressed its hearty approval of an act of the late General Conference providing for a Com- mittee on Temperance in every pastoral charge, to be ap- pointed at the last Quarterly Conference of each year. Nor less so, of the insertion of a new question to be pro- 282 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. pounded by the bishops to candidates for reception into full Conference membership; viz., ‘‘ Will you wholly ab- stain from the use of tobacco ?” We had been battling on these lines for years. On the latter we were probably the pioneer Conference of the en- tire Methodist family. Nearly a quarter of a century before (1857) we had solemnly pledged ourselves not to vote to admit any one to membership in our Conference, or to receive ordination, who habitually used tobacco, with- out a positive promise before the Conference of total ab- stinence therefrom in the future. It was therefore very gratifying to see the highest ecclesiastical body in our Church move in this direction. In the annals of last year allusion was made to a change of one of the presiding elders, with a promise of explanation in the proper place. The case was this. W. G. Miller was appointed pre- siding elder of Milwaukee District. He was in process of moving his family to Nebraska at the time the Conference was in session. He was expected to remain with us through the year; but being needed in that (Nebraska) Conference, which was held about the same time as ours, he consented to a transfer; and Henry Colman was re- moved from Bay View to fill the vacancy thus created. W. P. Stowe, presiding elder on Janesville District, had been elected at the General Conference in May next preceding the present Conference, agent of the Western Methodist Book Concern ; and entering at once upon the duties of his office, A. J. Mead was removed from the Algoma Street Church to succeed him. Hence, both these brethren who had had been appointed to pastorates, ap- peared at the beginning of the Conference of 1880 as pre- siding elders. Though Dr. Miller was transferred soon after our Con- ference of 1879, the fact is not indicated in our Minutes ANNALS OF 1880, 283 till 1880. So we must give him a parting word at this point. Several years ago he published a book entitled, ‘Thirty Years in the Itinerancy,” which was really an au- tobiography up to that time. It contains much interest- ing matter relating to our work in Wisconsin in early times, and also to a considerable number of preachers besides himself. It has been quite helpful to the writer, at some points, in preparing this work. He entered our ranks in 1845, and continued in the active work, with a brief in- terval of partially broken health, until 1879, filling some of our best appointments, performing district-work for many years, representing us in General Conferences and in the Missionary Board—in all of which relations he acquitted him- self well. He is still making a good record in his newer field. E. L. Eaton, G. A. Smith, R. Cooley, J. P. Roe, C. N. Stowers, T. F. Allen, C. R. Pattee, and R. E. McBride also left us this year by transfer to other Conferences; all of whom had rendered us more or less valuable service. J. R. Creighton and J. E. Gilbert were received by transfer. A. A. Hoskins withdrew from the Conference and Church. J. T. Chenoweth located. Six were received on trial; so our ministerial force re- mained numerically about as last year. There was an entire change in the district incumbents as appointed last year. H. Colman appears in charge of Milwaukee District; A. J. Mead, of Janesville District; J. M. Walker, of Appleton District; and A. P. Mead, of Waupaca District. The first named two, however, were in charge of the same districts during a part of the pre- vious year, as already stated. The two Norwegian districts were transferred to a newly 284 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. formed Norwegian Conference, of which an account will be given in another place. 1881. On the 21st day of October, 1881, our Conference as- sembled in Whitewater. Twice before we had been wel- comed by the people of that place. Since our first session there in 1859 the town had taken on much larger proportions. Our Church had also grown in numbers, wealth, and social position. One of the State Normal Schools being located there, it is very important to keep the pulpit aglow with celestial light, and the pew with the old Jerusalem fire. So it is everywhere, but especially in our centers of high-school instruction. Bishop C. D. Foss presided at this session. He was elected to the episcopacy in 1880, having been in the minis- try twenty-three years, fourteen of which were spent in the pastoral work, and nine in the educational. At the time of his election he had been president of the Wesleyan Uni- versity at Middletown, Connecticut, for five years. 8. Halsey was again elected secretary and J. R. Creigh- ton and A. J. Benjamin, assistants. The statistical secretaries of last year were re-elected. On the second day of July next preceding, Charles J. Guiteau attempted the assassination of James A. Garfield, President of the United States. The President lingered till September 19th—two days before our session began—then yielded to the increasing power of his fatal wound. Immediately after the organization of the Conference arrangements were made for suitable memorial services in view of this sad event, which in due time were held— Bishop Foss and Rev. 8. N. Griffith each giving a very fine address. The financial condition of the First Methodist Episcopal ANNALS OF 1881, 285 Church at Oshkosh again came to view. The pastor, D. J. Holmes, made a report that showed hopeful progress in “canceling its embarrassing debt. At this Conference relief was sought by our Church at Columbus. It seemed that our people there had been led into embarrassment in build- ing their house of worship, by the under estimates of their architect—a thing so often done that Churches ought to be more cautious. The Conference provided for the relief sought, by an appeal to the Church Extension Society and by author- izing the pastor at Columbus to solicit aid from other Churches in the Conference territory. J. W. McCormic, whos came to us two years before from Indiana, was reported to have preached doctrines contrary to our recognized standards. He frankly admit- ted it in a written statement, and by request of the Con- ference he withdrew from the ministry and membership of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Another case of withdrawal occurred of a very different character. Dr. Carhart, who was expelled at the last Annual Conference, had been restored to membership by a Judicial Conference, as already stated. Of course, he ‘“stood before the law” with the same rights as any of us possessed. But it was declared by several of the presiding elders that they could not find a place for him, and on this account a motion was made, and vehemently urged, that he be placed on the list of supernumeraries. He pro- tested, saying that he was able to do full work, and that he was ready to take the poorest charge in the Conference. Strange as it may seem, the motion prevailed—with but one majority, however. He was so grieved with this action that he withdrew. All this proceeding was doubtless erro- neous. He was entitled by all law and usage to an appointment. 286 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. For several years the general plan of the work has been essentially the same. Only one change in the district incumbents occurred this year. G. H. Moulton was appointed to the charge of Fond du Lac District in place of L. N. Wheeler, who had been sent to establish a mission in Western China. For about eight years—from 1865 to 1872 inclusive— he was a missionary in Eastern China, and was now selected as a suitable person to undertake this new enter- prise. Two of our esteemed brethren were this year removed by death—P. B. Pease and 8. V. R. SuepHerp. Mr. Pease entered upon a course of study at Oberlin, Ohio, but was compelled to desist on account of a partial failure in health. He recuperated, and in 1852 was received on trial in our Conference. From the first he was considered a man of promise. He continued to rise, filled several of our best appointments successfully, served two full terms as presiding elder, and was once (in 1872) a delegate to the General Conference. In 1880 he was appointed to Waukesha. He went to his new field, preached one Sabbath, returned to his home in Fort Atkinson to prepare for moving, was taken ill, and on the 10th of November he passed from earth, saying a little before to his wife: ‘‘I think I shall get well; but whether I do or not, it will be all right.” He was in the sixty-second year of his age at death. Mr. Shepherd died at his home at Iron Ridge, June 13, 1881, at the age of about seventy years. He entered our ranks in 1855, did effective work for about twelve years, then retired to a superannuate relation, in which he continued until called hence. While in the active ministry he was earnest, faithful, and successful. ‘‘ God owned his labors in the salvation of sinners. His end was triumphant peace.” e ANNALS OF 1881, 287 Mrs. Exvten B. Ropryson, wife of Rev. Elijah Robin- son, was also this year numbered with the dead. Her heart was in the work of an itinerant minister’s wife, but the fail- ing health of her husband greatly interrupted her hopes. About 1857 they came to this State from Vermont in quest of better health for him, but with little success. Calmly resigning all to God, she passed from labor to rest on the 24th of May, 1881. Besides those who died and withdrew, four left our work by location and three by transfer—eleven in all. To com- pensate for this loss, sixteen were received on trial and by transfer from other Conferences. But as four were assigned to foreign mission-fields, the force for home-work was but little changed. The reports of numbers, benevolences, etc., show but little variation from last year. s 288 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. CHAPTER XVIII. 1882-3. UR Conference assembled in 1882, on the twenty- eighth day of September, in Fond du Lac. This was our fourth session there—the first being thirty years before. Bishop Wiley presided. This was his second official visit to us. He came under the weight of a great sorrow. His son—a noble, promising youth—was burned to death, a few days before, by the accidental ignition of a cask of kerosene he was assisting to move. In his introductory words at the opening of the Conference he briefly alluded to it, and then requested us to make no reference to it in the Conference-room during the session. The re-election of all the secretaries of the preceding year completed the organization of the body for business. Nothing of special interest appears in the records of this year. The districts and their incumbents are the same as last year. Aggressive action is evident on all lines of Christian work, both in the ministry and in the laity. On all the great questions of reform the Conference still occupied a firm position. The changes in our ministerial force were not remark- able. We received three by transfer and seven on trial. We lost two by death, four by transfer, one by withdrawal, one by location, and two by discontinuance from probation. Those discontinued showed no adaptation to our work. J. S. Bolton had been with us for twenty-seven years, and worked faithfully in various places, frequently on the ANNALS OF 1882. 289 frontier. He was deemed loyal and every way reliable; but he became impressed with the idea that the Methodist Episcopal Church was not up to the Bible standard of holiness. This idea grew upon him, and during the pre- ceding year he withdrew and joined the Free Methodist Church, of which he is still a minister. It is evidently the duty of any minister who finds him- self really out of harmony with his denomination to seek a more congenial home. But it is not easy to see where any one can find a place that affords more freedom for real Christian experience and holy living than in the Methodist Episcopal Church. Eugene Yager, a promising young man—three years with us—was transfered to Detroit Conference; and Geo. C. Haddock, to Upper Iowa Conference. Mr. Haddock had been connected with our Conference twenty-two years. He early took rank as a preacher of unusual ability. He was a very positive character, and naturally given to con- troversy. These traits were probably fostered by his former political associations, having been engaged in secular news- paper work. The reader will remember him as the victim of the liquor-power in Sioux City, Iowa. The extensive and intense interest felt in this will justify a statement of the essential facts. They are in brief as follows: 1. Mr. Haddock was exercising the right of a citizen of Iowa in trying to secure the enforcement of the pro- hibitory liquor law of that State in Sioux City. 2. The enraged liquor-dealers there formed a conspiracy to ‘‘do up Haddock,” in which one Arensdorf was con- spicuous. 3. On the night of August 2, 1886, he was shot and instantly killed by one of the conspirators. 4, Arensdorf was arrestel, and put on trial for the murder. The jury disagreed—eleven for acquittal, one for conviction. 24 290 WISCONSIN CONFERENCE, 5. The juror that caused the division positively stated that he was asked to ‘‘ name his price.” 6. During the trial it was boldly talked on the street that the jury would divide, just as it did. It contained one man that could not be bought. 7. A second trial was ordered, and the sheriff this time seems to have been more successful in ‘‘ packing” a jury; for after an immense amount of testimony against Arens- dorf, that probably convinced ninety-nine in a hundred of his guilt, and a charge from the judge of three-quarters of an hour, bearing heavily against him, the jury retired, and in ten minutes returned with a verdict, ‘‘not guilty.” Probably all the deliberation they ever gave the case was to decide what their ‘‘ price” should be. 8. Immediately after the trial, Arensdorf and the jury went to a photograph gallery, which was already “ filled with Arensdorf’s friends,” and had their pictures taken in a group—the assassin, as he doubtless was, occupying the center. All this showed pre-arrangement. Some features of this case will come to view in a futur page. Jesse Cole had been in our Conference since 1868, and W. C. Cook since 1870. The former went to the North- west Iowa Conference, the latter to Minnesota. Both seem to be making good records, as they did with us. AsAanureL Moore, one of those whose demise occurred during the year, became a member of our Conference in 1868. He had been a member of the Maine and East Maine Conferences since 1836, till a few months before being readmitted to ours; and for ten successive sessions was its principal secretary. Of course his best work was done there. He was highly respected, and ‘died well” in April, 1882, in the seventy-second year of his age. John N. Nelson was received last year by transfer, as a preacher on trial of the first year, and appointed a ANNALS OF 1882, 291. nissionary at Para, Brazil, under Father (now Bishop) Taylor's direction, and fell a victim to the yellow fever there on the 26th of September, 1881, the very day after our Conference adjourned. He was reared with us, was a graduate of Lawrence University, the son of noble parents, once residing at Menomonee Falls, but now within the bounds of West Wisconsin Conference. He was a teacher in ‘‘Collegio Americano,” and gave promise of great usefulness. The wives of two others passed away during the year. The first was Mrs. Saran McFaruane. In 1848 she came with her husband (now Rev. W. McFarlane) from Scotland, where she had been strictly reared in the Pres- byterian Church. In 1856 she began a somewhat new ex- perience as the wife of a Methodist itinerant minister, her husband being that year received on trial in our Confer- ence. She was much attached to the work, and seems to have done her part well. She was called from it Decem- ber 5, 1881. The other, Mrs. CornetrA A. S. RicHarpson, fell a victim to typhoid fever, September 3, 1882. She was a devoted Christian, a great help to her husband, Rev. Jas. Richardson, and died very triumphantly. . 1869, 8,213 1,005 2,004} 241} 312) 642] 182/$316 . 1870, 6,779 907 1,766} 180) 299) 599} . @% 187k, « « 6,858 1,019 1,805] 235) 316) 564). . 1872, 6,734 1,251]. . . . | 198] 284} 582} 197] 358 «This year the falling off in collections is due to the division of the Conference. + About this time other collections for benevolent purposes were added, as noted in appropriate columns. 471 VOLENT COLLECTIONS. BENE “gavak 980} LO} SOJoPOoY ALVUOTSST]Y USLe10T 8 ,UBTT OM PUB JWAIBY O11} LOJ SUOTJDIT[OD BY} OF Pappy ace STANS ‘og ‘SSL UL SOFTS ‘GseT UL SCZI$ “PSST UL payat[oo pur aseyL “FOIS “68ST UT '9TZS ‘888 Ul ‘OFS “288T OL ‘gouedayUOQ INO UT TOIBuedo UL Mad SB Aja1o0g AIBUOISST © UO PF 8, Ub 0 Ay 94} sivok Moy BLOT —'g “N 696'8 OL8"S B6S'T I6E-L (sig lore joor {sz6‘t |s99‘OL BLg'% —- |9ZB'L “688 L II's Tze Lear | 488 LIZ |a6l jag jgiz‘t ‘[92g°6 ere's = |EGo'L ‘S88 cet = |66a'T «OSS 6S6 FOc JOSE jLIg jSFS‘t |{26S°6 TIUs = j9PS‘L ‘ISS o0s's = feat =: Jes0cE = aes Z6L |FLT = ojaes = JG LZ‘L—«/968'8 LPOG (68269 ‘OSS JEUSL 926° £06 F6L SLL |F9T FOS |TIOG [F688 983s —«|SOF'9 ‘ess 00s: =| T8Z‘9 ~—s|6F9 9¢8 got jert |z6g jteZ't = {Si FOr 98st —ggg'e FEl's =—« 16GO'E—s« GHD 6FS‘T IS |8eT 60F'T | F06‘9 96F‘T sor’ 029s =|. 96'T oro 1L0°% = |8LT IFS GIg‘l |Fa0'L g69'T = |9ae'e Sel‘t 119 199 16L 106 —-|0SL FOS’T = |eea'g 266 1OL‘F : ‘TSS SOFT 689'F SBE 189 IZt— |6T Gast |S TS‘s F86 Peer g ‘O88 so STOLE eEg 669 691 GFL los‘ #859 636 gge¢ . 3 ‘BLST : O8e ucr hot GAL ee oss e08'¢ #66 616'F ‘SLST 8 Be UF PGF 28t |S “66 SIT‘? GOST GSE ‘128T * Sts OIF GIF Z6l TAL 116 LEO aes LEO'e ‘9181 668'F = |Gcs gee ECF 9FZ —-|003 FELT = 9802 164 GPa'9 ee “G28 09e Plt G9 Go 8tZ QT 6IOL = |eea'9 09 298'¢ ce ‘FIST BZ 3S [Lats Sscs 119$ 9828 [Fess loss'is — |696'8$ Sal'ss | 1F89$ “g18T ee peepee | ce Ree | eee — —— —_—_—— (—S—= ——— ceeennp hb aeenaning | Sse St, = z = = : eos : a 3 7 = : 4 8: Ss 2: : as ao g & 2 a = 2: SB | B: va 33 gn% au 3 g = 22 33 = Bo os x = i 2 = g 2h gS 3 a8 BS) oils cas ete heey 4 S a z ee an a aa a” “AMY NOISNELT ‘SNOILOATI1I0O9 LNA TOAANAA 472 APPENDICES TO PARTS IT AND II. APPENDIX C. This table shows the number of Church edifices and par- sonages each year, and their valuation, as reported to the en- suing Conference. Also, the number of Sabbath-schools, offi- cers, and scholars. The earliest accessible reports of these were made in 1850, and no report of the valuation of Church prop- erty is found until 1859. JO < wv < iz ° wn Year /@6/ 5 |e | & (|38| Ba] 2 | § : 2 1/8) € |?é] S| #% | & : B z = a 5 ; i : Pe a 1850, ...| 36) . «| 383i}... «| 144) 1,182) 4,826) 183 1851, ...] 48)... 34 . | 205) 1,638} 8,409) 270 1952, ...] 60 42 . | 241) 1,903] 9,273) 221 1858, . «| 70 43 ‘ 243) 2,009} 9,396] 273 1854, Ts 41}... | 259} 1,989] 10,180) 276 1855, won| “92 .| 54 . | 280) 2,252} 9,791) 172 1856, ew] Be ef 363) 4 . | 167} 1,358] 6,403) 81 1857, . . «| Noj report. oad Oe (4 225} 2,090) 10,040) 167 1858, .. | Nolreport. |. .{|. . - -| 150} 1,303} 6,407} 294 1859, . 87] $186,500] 58] $30,200) 196) 1,827] 8,774) 187 1860, . «| 96} 185,600) 65} 33,100) 239] 2,353} 11,468) . 1861, . | 100} 191,926} 70} 35,575) 232) 2,142] 10,853) . 1862, .| 98] 187,150) 69} 383,675) 246] 2,274) 12,407). . 1863, . | 114] 220,000) 75] 37,250) 230] 2,169] 12,158) 496 1864, . .| 102) 228450) 75} 52,300) 217} 2,141) 12,378} 246 1865, 107| 254,950} 77} 50,500] 227; 2,280} 12,921] . 1866, . | 117} 328,600} 84} 64,525} 217] 2,323/12.814) . 1867, 132] 420,050} 89} 80,300} 169) 1,926) 12,244) 421 1868, 141] 484,550) 87} 91,515} 211) 2,291) 13,979) 381 1869, . .| 149] 520,695} 92) 96,425] 224) 2,419) 14,838] 276 1870, 163} 717,400} 95| 105,250} 278) 1,951) 16,250) 87 1871, . .| 172) 734,850) 97) 108,780) 200) 2,704] 17,233) 238 1872, . | 182] 747,785] 103] 115,930] 239) 2,513] 16,919} 731 1873, . . -| 191] 782,600) 106) 162,252) 210| 2,643) 16,564] . 1874, 194} 807,950} 99] 119,677| 228] 2,476} 16,350) . . 1875, . . .| 199] 845,650} 99) 122,600} 244/ 2,469] 16,818} 446 1876, . . .| 204} 826,700) 105) 123,870) 223) 2,257) 15,781) . . 1877, . . -| 201) 792,500) 105) 121,450} 232) 2,332) 15,966) . . 1878, . . | 204} 769,650] 106} 113,900} 234] 2,464] 16,029). . 1879, . . .| 212) 738,250) 110) 114,795) 248) 2,427) 16,252). . 1880, . «| 199} 708,850) 106) 110,870) 221) 2,204) 14,252) . 1881, . | 190] 692,400] 109} 113,800] 216) 2,193] 14,705) . . CHURCHES 1ND PARSONAGES—PREACHERS. 4738 ee E Z z |5E] £8 Babs YEAR. BS Ee 5 S 83) SF 2 3 3 2 8 2 jfe| $8 a he 1882, : 195] $708,650) 111) $122,750) 219, 2,262) 15,293 1883, 197| 726,555} 111| 124,450} 224| 2,292) 15 209 1884, 216] 780,000) 118) 129,050) 231 2) 419] 16,736 1885, « « | 214) 793,700) 118) 133,125) 230 2) 401 16, 517 1886, 213) 784,825) 114) 140,975) 222 2) 456 16, 138 1887, 214! 798,800) 118} 148,975} 239 2’ 689 18, 550}. . 1888, 215} 831,900) 117) 149,300) 235 2) 617 18, 821]. 1889, . . . | 218} 856,050} 122| 178,750} 239 2 711] 19, 639 E APPENDIX D. NAMES OF PREACHERS FIRST AND LAST APPEARING IN OUR CONFERENCE MINUTES. The left-hand column shows when the relation commenced ; the right-hand column when it ceased. If no dato appears at the right of the name, the one designated is still connected with the Conference. The letter 7, opposite the name of any one, indicates that he located that year; d, that he died; t, that he was transferred to some other Conference; e, that he was expelled; w, that he withdrew from the Conference and the Church; and 7, that he was removed from our territory, either by appointment elsewhere, while we were connected with another Conference, or by Conference division. A date on the right of a name, not preceded by a letter, indi- cates that the person was then discontinued as a probationer. N. B.—The reader will note that John Clark and Geo. White were sent to our territory as missionaries; the former by the New York Conference in 1832, the latter by the Oneida Conference in 1834, without any change in their Conference relations. In 1836 they were transferred to the Illinois Con- ference at which date their names first appear in its records. No account is made of the temporary absence of a member from Conference by transfer or location. 1828, John Dew, r, ‘ 1828 | 1835, A. Bronson, r,. —. 1855 1833, J. T. Mitchell, rv, . 1841 “ M. Robinson. 1834, L. Bevins, 7,. . 1834) 1836, R. Haney,r,. . . 1836 “ H. Orews,r,. . . . 1842) “ John Clark, r,. . . 1836 1835, J. Hadley, r, . . 1885; “ J. Crummer, r,. .1846 474 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND JT. 1836, S. Pillsbury, os . . 1838 (reo. White, J, - 1836 “ W.S. Crissey, fs - 1836 De Wi Nicholas,.t » 1838 #8 Ds POG th es: ev as 1838 “ Colon D. James, r, 1836 “J. W. Haney, 7, 1836 “David King,1,. —. 1848 1837, H. W. Reed,r,. . . 1841 O. F. Curtiss, 1 y+» + 1839 ‘ §. Stebbins, 7, . 1844 “ JR. Goodrich, r,. +» 1843 “H. W. Frink. “J. Halstead, d, . 1888 “ T. W. Pope. “ B. Weed, ¢, . 1839 ‘““ D. Hotchkiss. ‘* W.Simpson,r,.. . 1841 “ J.W. McMurtry, r, . 1837 ‘A. H. Bonney, r, 1837 1838, T. C. Lopas, r,. —- 1838 I. J. Stewart, 7, 1838 oe OW. Weigley, e, 1842 “J. F. Flanders. “8. P. Keyes, 7, 1842 “J. Hodges, 7, . . 1841 “Rollin Brown. 1839, J. Field, ¢, . 1845 ‘A. Chenoeth, 7, 1842 “J. McKean, r, 1842 “ J.G. Whitford. 1840, Jas. Ash,d, . . . 1848 “ L. F. Moulthrop, d, . 1876 ‘“ H. Whitehead, 7, . . 1844 ‘« D. Worthington, r, . 1841 “ Sidney Wood, r, 1841 1841, E. P. Wood, 7, . 1841 “J. Hurlburt, /, . 1847 “CO, N. Wager, r, 1845 “ T. M. Fullerton,r, . 1848 “A. Warren, J, 1847 ‘ B.T. Kavanaugh, r,. 1844 “Geo. Copway,!, . 1843 “ W. Hewson, 4, . 1841 “ §.P. Richardson. 1841 ‘“ Silas Bowles, r, . 1844 “ F, T. Mitchell, vr, . . 1848 1842, M. Bourne, r, . 1844 “Jas. Mitchell, r, . . 1844 “ JI.G. Whitcomb, 1, . 1846 “ N. Jewett, r,. . . . 1842 1842, M. Decker, “ oe “ ck - §. H. Stocking, 7, . : Or gs J.P. “Gallup, l, 3 W. 4H. Sampson. 1843, N. Swift, 7. 6“ ot “ J. M. Snow, d, . Asa Wood, l,. . Stephen, Jones, w, R. Delap, J, J. Lewis,d, ... J. L. Bennett,. . David Lewis. 1844, S. W. Martin, w, . “cc Wm. Allen, J,. . J. Penman, /, . . G. N. Hanson, d, . R. Beaty, 7, a tk C. D. Cahoon, r, . C. McClure, w, . - F. A. Savage, r, 1845, H. Summers, t, « N. P. Heath, 7, M. Dinsdale, r ae S. W. Ford. J. W. Burton, e, E. Springer, d, T. P. Bingham, M. 8S. Noble, W.G. Miller, t, 8. B. Whipple, 7, . W. Oliver, l,. . J. M. Walker, d, . J. Willson,... . C. G. Adams, T. W. Perkins, . . G. W. Cotrell, J, M. L. Reed, 1846, A. Wooliscrott, r, “ “ rcs «c D. Dickinson, B. Close, t, . R. P. Lawton. J. S. Prescott, ¢, - 1842 - 1849 1874 . 1843 1842 - 1853 1855 . 1842 1843 1844 1847 1864 1862 1854 . 1850 1844 - 1848 1843 - 1860 . 1844 1850 . 1857 . 1844 . 1844 . 1850 . 1844 . 1852 - 1845 . 1846 H. J. Humphries, , . 1845 . 1848 . 1850 1845 . 1846 - 1880 . 1846 . 1849 . 1885 1845 . 1845 « 1845 . 1847 . 1846 1846 1846 1852 1850 1846, A. B. Randall, w, c “c ce “ oc “ NAMES OF PREACHERS. A. P. Allen, /, N.S. Green, #, . W. M. D. Ryan, t, J. Chandler, r, . J.C. Parks, 7, J. Leekenby, 7, Geo. Lovesee, t, J. Bean, 7, F.Smith,t, .. J. W. Putnam, ¢, . 1847, D. Brooks, r, . a“ “ ce I. Searls, d 23 Ww. Tasker, J, . R. E. Thomas, ¢, R. R. Wood, 7, H. Requa, d, . S. R. Thorp, J, 8. M. Stone, J, J. W. Burton, e, . F, M. Mills,t, . . J. W. Wood, e,. H. V. Train, J, C. Hobart, t, W. Willard. A. Hanson, /, J. Luckock, ¢, W. M. Osborn, r, W. Lattin. G. Whitman, d, M. Bennett, t, 1848,-B. L. Thomas, . “ “cc “ a 1849, C. A. Newcomb, 1, “ « “ E. Holmes, I, . J.E. Willson, t, A. C. Pennock, J, .. R.Shane,..... Jos. Williams, . . L. Dickens, . . H. Hersey, d, . . Cornelius Smith, J, Dan’ Stanbury, d. S. P. Waldron, r, . N. Butler, 7, Chas. Hill, . . ‘\R, 8S. Hayward. E.S. Bunce, rv. . J. Harrington, d, . Wr. Owens, t, J. N. Ward, . : . 1869 - 1873 . 1860 . 1846 . 1846 . 1846 - 1846 1848 . 1855 1850 - 1856 1855 1871 1850 1851 - 1855 1864 1852 . 1852 1848 1849 . 1859. 1853 1855 1852 1850 . 1855 . 1848 1856 1848 1863 1850 1855 1848 . 1848 1850 - 1884 » 1852 . 1853 1860 - 1855 - 1855 . 1849 . 1855 - 1850 1856 . 1849 1849, Chas. Hollis, . “A. McIntosh, ; “ 0. F. Comfort, J, . ‘‘ Enos Stevens, ? “ P. S. Bennett. “John Tibbals, /, 1850, FE. Yocum, ¢, S. Watts, 1, ... “ §. L. Leonard, d, . ‘* Win. Britton, J, ‘TI. Roberts, J, Jas. Barnes, . . “ W.H Thompson, e, “J. M.S. Maxson, d, “ J.B. Mills,i. R. Blackburn. “J.C. Dana, w, J. Lawson, r,. C. Lawson, I, . “ C. P. Sanford, “Wm. Shroff,d,. . “ Q. E. Hall,l,.. . “ ©. G. Connable, d, . ‘J. Marshall, “ L. M. Cochran, »,. . 1851, J. L. Dyer, r,.. . J. M. Wells. “« W. Robotham, Ist, ‘ Thos. C. Golden, t, “ D. O. Jones, d,. . “G. W. Richardson, r, “John Nolan, ¢, “ R. Cobban, ¢, . “Thos. Orbison, d, . R. Dudgecn, 7,. . “N.S. Green,. . ** W. Robotham, 2d. “ “H. Wood, 7, “EE. Tucker, /,. . . “ R. Moffitt, ,. . . se ML Sy oediey: « bes “ N. Mayne, 7, “ R. Price,r,. . . “Geo. Chester, d, “CLP. Beis 54 “J. Pearsall, “OR. Everdell,, “eM, Emebeluhs “A. H. Walter, t, . “Boyd Phelps, ¢,. . 475 . 1850 . 1851 . 1856 - 1851 1857 . . 1857 . 1861 . 1879 1851 1852 1851] . 1855 1859 1856 - 1861 1855 1851 . 1851 1877 . 1857 1852 - 1852 1855 1855 - 1851 - 1858 1886 1855 . 1858 1860 - 1872 - 1855 . 1852 1855 » 1853 - 1871 1853 1855 1855 1865 1858 . 1852 1852 . 1872 1854: 476 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND IL. 1851, = Calender, d 8. L. Brown,* ee C. Willerup, 4, 1852, E. B. Russell, , “Levi Fuller, “ Wm. F. Delap, r r, “Wm. Spell, w, . . ‘Jabez Brooks, *, “Jas. W. Lyman, 1, ‘© R. Roberts, “ P. B. Pease, d,. . “Geo. Fellows, d, “Wm. Averill, /, . “J. Anderson. “J. H. Hazeltine, J, “J.C. Hudson, t ‘‘ R. Delap, 7, “8. C. Thomas. “ Silas Searls,t t, 1853, J. Padgeham, . ie e Curtiss, t,. . “ON. J. Aplin. “Wm. Sturges, ¢, oD Oy Hollister, d, . “ J.D. Houghawout, a “A. M. Hulse,. « “A.C. Squire, J, «R. R. Hamilton, “Benj. Crist, 7, “ C. Vessey, “ H. J. Vanschoick, d, “ E. Page, r,. . “J. Hooper, 7, . “J. M. Shultz, . “J. H. White, . “John Ferry, . “ D. B. Tracy, . “ C.C. Mason,. . “ A. Griswold, l,. . « L. W. McSchooler, “ E. Cook, t,. . 1854, D. Hale, d, . «J. Howd, ¢, “Peter Lang, ‘““ D. Kidder,.. . ° * Suspended. - 1871 - 1863 1876 1855 1852 - 1855 - 1866 - 1855 . 1864 - 1852 1881 - 1887 - 1876 1860 . 1854 - 1855 1853 . 1855 . 1866 1868 1869 1855 1853 1864 . 1855 1855 1855 1853 1855 1855 1854 1855 . 1855 - 1853 . 1855 1860 . 1853 1860 . . 1888 - 1872 1855 . 1855 1854, N. E. Cobleigh, t, . 1859 “ “ch Henry Scott, . . 1854 A.G. Cooley, 7 r, . . 1855 W. R. Jones, t, . 1878 H. Garden, . - 1856 O. B. Knudson, ¢, . 1861 Steen Steenson, t,. . 1858 Neils Oleson,.. . . 1855 D. B. Anderson, . 1855 L. Hallock, J,.. . . 1861 G. F. Hilton, r, . . 1855 H. B. Crandall, l, . 1870 L. Bell, 7, . . . 1855 D. O. Vanslyke, r, . 1855 S. Anderson, ¢, . 1858 C. M. Webster, . . 1855 Jas. Sims, r,. . . . 1855 H. Palmer, r,. . 1855 R. Langley, r, . . 1855 8. Dodge, 7, . . 1855 J. W. Waterbury, t, 1855 W.H. Bunce, vr, . . 1855 C. C. Kidder, 7, . . 1855 Ezra Tucker, J, . 1856 Geo. H. Fox, l,.. . 1862 A. H. Annis,t . . 1860 J. W. Donalson, ve 1858 J. B. Armitage, t , + 1856 J. D. Requa, t,. . . 1868 E. W. Stevens, l,. . 1868 Edwin Buck,. . — . 1855 R. Gould, 7, . 1855 Samuel Still,. . . . 1854 1855, W. McDonald, 7, . . 1857 ce 6c we ““ C. A. Weirich, 7, . . 1855 A. Foster,w,. . . . 1872 R. Robotham, . . . 1855 8. V. R. Shepherd, d, 1881 Richard Mates, e, . 1855 Calvin Kellogg, r, . 1855 R. Fancher, 7,. —. 1855 N. Wheeler, ry. + . 1850 S. Salisbury, ¢, . 1868 Jas. Cady, . . 1855 Wm. Harvey, 7, . 1855 {Silas Searls was transferred to our Conference in 1852, and served the Church at Kenosha, and transferred to Rock River Conference in 1853; but his name never appeared in the list of appointments except as transferred. t Deposed. NAMES OF PREACHERS. 1855, G. W. Delamater, ¢, 1870 T. T. Cutchen, . . . 1856 L. Peterson, t,. . . 1858 Wm. Stevens, e,. . 1858 John Whitworth, 7, 1855 Jas. Peet, 7, . . . 1855 C. P. Hackney, r r, 1855 Peter Locy, 7, 1855 A. McWright, r,. . 1855 N. 8. Philips, 1855 H. Hard, . 1855 Alonzo Angel, 7, - 1855 A.J. Nilson, r,. 1855 Z. &. Hurd, r, 1855 Chas. Baldock. Jos. 8. Bolton, ,. 1882 H.H &mitb,. 1855 M. Crownover, r, . . 1855 L. D. Tracy, l,. . . 1867 J. Burlingame, 7. 1855 John Murrish, r, . . 1853 H. R. Jones, . 1855 I. M. Stagg, r, 1855 QO. P. Brown, t,.. . 1856 E. P. Beecher, d,. 1877 J. C. Robbins. J.M. Soe r, 1855 R. Hoover,.. . . . 1855 R. Z. Mason, w, . 1867 , Jacob Miller, t, 1859 D. F. Holcomb, - 1858 D. T. Olcott, t,. 1887 G. N. Van Vleit,. 1856 J. E. Grant. N. Jolinson, 1856 J. C. Aspenw all, , 1858 Lars Peterson, t, 1858 J. J. Willis, 1856 B. R. Harringtun, 1857 R. C. Hunt... . 1865 C. 8. Macr: ading, J, . 1858 R. M. Beach, t,. . . 1866 J. Reinhart, - 1857 C. J. Fairbanks. W. McFarlane. Jas. Cushing, /,.. . 1859 G. W. Slater, J, . 1864 8. Smith. A. C. Eliot, ¢, 1867 J.C. Spellum, t, . . 1858 J. Tidland, ¢, - . 1858 1856, “ce 1857, “ “ 1859, “ “W. DLA , Ole Helland, ow. ~ KE. Peterson, d, .. * O. B. ee ty: J. Cushing, J, W. T. Colburn. G. 8. Allen, e, W. M. Anderson, d, mes. J. De La Mater, t,. . D. W. Couch, t, . T. White, d, . J. K. Sheldon, d, T. Ross, A.C. Manwell, ¢, R. C. Parsons, d, J, E. Baker, ¢, J.T. Suffron. F. O. Blair, ¢, C. Steenson, /, A. Seiderholm, ¢, . C. Scammon, w, H. C. Tilton, d, . C.D. Pillsbury. E. Robinson, d, . J. Whitney, d, . N. Green, tf, . . C. C. Syms, t, A. Hagenson, 7, J. Van Voris, J, . . J. W. Olostead. A. A. Horton, J, . C. D. Cook. L. N. Wheeler. P. Stowe. J. C. Crawford, A. D. Hendrickson, H. Sewell. W. B. Holt, J. Oleson, T. Potter. T. Peep. E. Palmer, . J. I. Fort. C. W. Keller, . H. Bannister, d, W.Teal,t,. . E. K. Bushee, J, A. Hitchcock, /, A. A. Reed. G. A. Smith, /, John Jones, J, 477 1861 1859 - 1862 1888 1858 . 1868 . 1861 1863 1873 1887 1868 1859 1863 . 1858 1869 1879 1887 1883 . 1860 1867 . 1862 1879 1861 . 1864 1858 1858 - 1863 . . 1859 . 1859 . 1860 1858 1883 . 1887 . 1865 1859 - 1880 1879 478 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. 1859, 1. 8, Bldridge. 1861, A. a D. “2A. . W. Brooks, ¢, Fallows, t,. . - “ce “ “ “cc te 8. A. S. Lang, J, Cross, 1, Chas. Smith. W. G. Bancroft. E. Bassett, w, I. Wiltse, d, . W. B. Ferguson, c A. 8. Thompkins, J, E. A. L. Cooper, . . M. Chase, . J. B. Graham, ¢, Wx. Morse, d, . L. E. Eldridge, /, . R. A. Fairbairn, W. J. Olmstead. 1860, I. L, Hauser, w, W.B. Rowe, /, Lavelle, ¢, Rider, J, . Thos. Walker. Thos. Little, . Geo. C. Haddock, ¢, H. Hall, t,.. A. M. D. Warner, ? B. J. C. Parker, ? G. Pingree. W. Carver, t, C. Steinson, f, W. R. Jones, ¢, Q 8. O. ‘CAR. E. 2,R. O. Kellogg, d, . . T B. Bishop, ¢, H. Muller, ¢, J. Mead. A. Willard, t, W. Bosworth. D. Farnham. C. Willson. T. F. Allen, ¢, Ww. Woodruff, t, 2 W. Pierce. . M. Beach, ¢, . J. Cowles, t, ra Reynolds. M. Fullmer, ¢, D. Cole. A. England, t, E. Lake, J, . 1872 - 1862 - 1867 . 1878 1862 1868 1859 - 1859 - 1860 . 1888 1863 1859 . 1885 . 1862 G. W. Anderson, /, J. E. 1863 . 1874 - 1862 1860 1882 - 1863 1867 . 1873 . 1865 . 1860 . 1878 . 1870 . 1866 . 1865 . 1874 . 1861 1865 1880 . 1880 - 1886 . 1880 1883 1873 . 1865 1863, Thos. Hpshe d,. ce R. Cooley, t,. . . 1864, H.L. Ohcabes lin: J, C. Hazleton, ¢, D. C. Adams, . . W. W. Case, t,.. C. E. Lum, i, . . A. M. Stephens, t, Rk. Henry, / 1865, Geo. M. Steele, t, “ « XG S. Hubbs, d, C. E. Carpenter. Geo. Pinney, . M. B. Y. Bristol. 186Baninel Lugg. oe 6 6 “a “ T. L. Olmstead, ¢, Moses Alley, 2, F. I. Bell,. . . J. L. Hewitt. E. W. Kirkham, d, 1867\E. 8S. McCbesny. 4“ “ “ “c 7 +6 6c te W. J. Mitchell, t,.. A. A. Hoskins, w, S. Reynolds, w,. . H.H. Jones, l.. . S.C. Lamb, J, S. Vandersoll, /, T. B. Brown,. . . G. W.Wells, d, . E. W. Stevens, /, . C. N. Stowers, t, 1868, W. W. Painter. 6c W. F. Yocum,. . eo. Parsons. ‘ “Jas. Turner, . - J. T. Boynton, d, . G.H. Moulton, ¢, . Jesse Cole, t,.. . A. Moore, d,.. .- W. W. Window, d, C. W. Brewer, t, . D. Deal, t, : C. Skinner, ¢, H. 8. White, /, J.T. eel 1, . J. T. Martell, L Li. B, Bullock. C. O. Treider, 7, . . 1871 1880 1881 - 1864 1875 1869 - 1866 . 1878 1879 1867 1887 - 1867 . 1865 . 1866 - 1872 1871 1880 - 1885 - 1877 » 1874 1770 . 1867 . 1888 1868 1880 1869 . 1868 - 1884 1885 - 1882 - 1882 . 1886 - 1866 . 1870 1869 - 1874 1874 . L875 1880 1885 1872 . 1879 NAMES 1869, W.H. Thompson, f, . “--§. Halsey. ‘A. Porter, l,. - “ G. W. Burtch, 4, . “ G. C. Wells, t, . “J. H. Johnson, ¢, ‘ ©. P. Peterson, t, “Pp. E. Brown, ¢, “ P. Jensin, r, 1870, J. M. Craig, e, “J. A. Colt, t, “Dp. W. Smith, ¢, “EF H. Brunson, /, “J. Haw, t, ‘* Wm. Bennett. ‘ Wm. C. Cook, t, “LP. W. Peter . W. Peterson. “CO. R. Pattee, ¢, “ W. W. Warner, d, E. B. Cummings. _¥. V. Trenery. “ 0. B, Thayer, 7, “0. T. Teal, ¢, 1871, E. L. Eaton. “os, A. Olin. “J. B. Cole. ‘MM. Hansen, “J. P. Roberts. “JW. Fridd, d, . 1872, H. 8. Carhart, “A.M. Bullock. ‘“ D. Brown, J, . * $8. A. Stockman, ** Karl Schou, ? B. Johansen, t, L. Doblong, t, “J. W. Whitney, “ C. R. Chapin, 1, “ §. E. Willing, w, . “FE. A. Wanlass, ? ¢, A.C. Higgins, /, 1873, L. F. Cole, i,. . - “ R. J. Judd. “ D. O. Sanborn. “J. F. Decker. “J. Christensen, . ‘* ©. Lorensen,. . “ M.Nilson,. . OF PREACHERS. 1879 1872 1883 . 1871 N. Christophensen, . 1869 « 1872 1874 1870 1879 1875 1878 1877 . 1873 1876 . 1882 1880 1875 1875 1870 1872 . 1888 “J. W. Carhart, i,. . 1881 . 1872 . 1883 - 1872 - 1879 . 1878 1876 . 1872 . 1876 . 1874 . 1886 - 1878 . 1881 1873 . 1873 - 1873 1873, C. P. Rudd, ¢, . ‘“ Peter Oleson, t, . ““ R, E. McBride, ¢, . “eM. Evans. « . E. Webb, t, 1874, Ole Oleson, t, “ “ OC. L. Carlberg, ¢, “ F. Ring, t, ‘« N. Jonasen, ¢, “J. Bakke, ‘“ H. P. Berg, t, “ 8B, Jorgensen, t, ‘* B.Larssen,t, . . “ T.T. Howard, J, . “ G. W. Pratt. “ W. E. Walker, “ O. B. Clark. “ C. A. Stockwell, t, *_-B. F. Sanford. “1. 8. Alling,d,. . “ W. F. Randolph, ¢, ‘* A. Hollington, ¢, . “TT. H. Walker, t, . “=, E. Goldthorp. 1875, B. T. White. “OW. W. Willson. “LH. F. Knight. QO. Wierson, r, “Pp. B. Smith, r, . . “ W. C. Sawyer, /, - “ S$. N. Griffith, J, “ C¢, Omann,t,. . “ W.B. Robinson. “ T. Clithero. * A, P. Mead,d,. . “ I. 8. Leavitt. ‘“ H. 8. Richardson. “ CC. L. Haskell, ¢, 1876, F. &. Stein, ¢. “Jos. Cross, t,. . . “ W. J. Fisher. ‘“ H. Curtiss, ¢, ‘HT. Favill, w, “wd. Favill,w, oo. . te. G. Updyke, t, . “ "F.C. Haddock, “ W.C. Waldron, /, “J.T. Chenoetb, 7, “J. H. Johnson, r, 1877, 8. P. Murch, J,. . N. F. Carstensen, t, . - 1876 . 1876 479 1876 - 1876 1880 . 1874 - 1876 1876 1876 . 1874 . 1876 . 1876 . 1876 . 1881 1876 - 1888 . 1878 1881 . 1879 - 1885 . 1879 . 1879 L874 - 1884 - 1876 - 1887 1878 1876 - 1883 . 1888 - 1886 1889 - 1877 1884 1880 . 1879 - 1881 480 1877, D. 8. Howes, iS F. F. Teeter, t, “J. 8. Davis. Axel Gustafsen, r, “ W. W. Ramsay, ¢, 1878, John Varty. “=—A. J. Benjamin. ‘“ “H. G. Sedgewic, ¢, “J. Richardson, d, “ ©. L. Logan, ¢, ‘« E. B. L. Elder. ‘“ W.F. Dale, “J. O. Saniker, r, . O. Hazelton, t, D. Barrow. . L. Hanson, 7, onus: ““D. J. Holmes, t, . ‘Coots. Jolliffe. es J. Garvin. “" Geo. White. ca Pease. oe R. Hayward. “ V. Charroin, t,. . “ C. E. Smith, t,. . “Eugene Yager, |, . «J. Sanaker, r, H. Danielson, r, “* J.W.McCormic, wv, 1880, C. B. Wilcox. “ 0. A. Curtiss, ¢, “ D. J. Whiting, ¢, “ M. F. Stright, ¢, “ C. H. Betts. . B. Lounsbury, /, W. W. Stevens. . R. Creighton. J. E. Gilbert, t, 1881, J. E. Wright. « J.N. Nelson, d, «J. H. Nelson, ¢, “TD. H. Snowdon, “ 7. P. Haylett. ‘© W.R. Mellot. “ C. A. Wilson,t. . ‘J. Schneider. “ G, E. Fellows, . . “J. A. Brevier. “Pp. Burk, . D. Thomsen, Tis a, ss Peterson, 19.608 - 1887 - 1883 - 1879 . 1877 1884 1884 . 1883 - 1878 . 1879 . 1879 - 1881 1879 1879 . 1885 . 1888 “ TT. J. McMurray, J, . . 1887 . 1882 . 1879 . 1879 . 1881 1883 1880 . 1889 - 1881 - 1886 1883 - 1882 1887 1881 . 1881 . 1884 . 1881 APPENDICES TO PARTS J] AND II. 1881, G. W. Horton, ¢, . “J. F. Tubbs, t, . . “ F. L. Whorton, ‘ : “ CM. Hurd, t, 1882, W. C. Longden, t, “, E, Cadman. m. Hooton. “f- Perry Millar. O. H. P. Smith, ¢, “ OW. EF. Nelson, i, . 1887 1887 - 1889 1885 . 1884 . 1887 - 1884 “ R.R.C. Granthun, t, 1885 “A. D. McHenry, t, “Thos. Sharpe. 1883, W. H. Lacy, t, “IE. E. Cheeseman, t, . . 1885 “ T. S. Oadams, ‘OG. H. Trever. s a H. Dry, ¢, . L. King, t Ree “Enoch Perry. “Hes O. Cady. “« L. RB. Clendenning. ““ M. T. Seeley, ¢, “« F. B. Sherwin. “ 'W. D. Cornell. a Frank Millar. «J. B. Beadle. “ 8B. P. Raymond, ¢, W. F. Warren, J, . “H.C. Myres,l,. . I. G. Pollard, J, “« J. 1. Foot, t. 1884, E. Duckworth. “John Wills. as. Churm. “J. H. Cooper,t,. . “ OH. W. Brown. W.H. Hollister, ¢, . 4. H. Lugg. Albert. Smith, “~ J. 8. Norris. tT. W. North. «J. S. Lean. Wm. Medland. ee “LWa Rollins, ¢, “VR. Davidson. Thos. James. “Wom. Clark. 1885, W. D. Cox. “Geo. Merrifield, t, «A. L. Whitcomb. 1887 . 1887 1884 1888 - 1884 . 1889 1889 - 1885 . 1886 . 1883 - 1886 1888 1887 1887 . 1887 DISTRICTS AND PASTORAL CHARGES. 188"W. E. Morris. ‘© Ie. C. Potter. “J. W. Huston, J ee C. John. C. Bristol,w,. . . 1886, Wm. Groves. «J. R. Fretts. “ W. H. Summers. “WW. Millar. ‘Frank R. Nimits. “« E. O. Bullock, ¢, . “OW. A. Hall. “Enoch Savage. “ T. DeWitt Peak. ‘« J.C. Jackson, t, “__-. Plantz, t, “J. Howarth. ‘LJ. Reynolds. 188%; G. W. Verity. “AW. Gh. Cooper. om, H, Tippett. ‘© J. i. Henderson, . . “W. C. Hickman. “I. J. Patten. «J. C. Maxham. “ F.C. Brayton. “— W. Woodside. “SJ. E. Farmer. . 1887 . 1888 . 1888 1889 1887 1888 1888, M. ““c 481. 8. Terry. A. A. Wood. \W. A. Peterson. F, Roberson. J. G. Gelling. M. Wolverton. S.A) Sheard. A.M. DeFord. . A. Drew. ‘J.J. Hartley. “A m. Moil. «“c “c Henry Ostrum. W. W. Warner. J. M. Woodward. 1889, T. D. Williams. “cc “ae 6“ “ce “a A 1. J.D. Kenestrick. C. P. Christian, D. ©. Savage. J. H. James. C. W. Turner. Evertz. W. Botzer. E. J. Symons. Thos, Roberts. J. N. Funston. S, Light. C. W. Gallagher. Thos. Day. APPENDIX E. NAMES OF DISTRICTS AND PASTORAL CHARGES First appearing in the Minutes of the Illinois and Rock River Conferences in Wisconsin ; and of those inthe Min- utes of Wisconsin Conference in this State and in Min- nesota, while the latter was under the supervision of the former, 1834. 1835. 1836. Towa Circuit, in Galena District. Milwaukee, in Chicago District. Root River, Oneida and Menomonee, Green Bay, Platte- ville, Mineral Point, Prairie du Chien. 1837. lan, Helena, Madison. 1838. Deansburg and Fond du Lac, Honey Creek. 1839. 1840, 40 Milwaukee District, Racine, Sheboygan, Madison, .\zta- Fort Winnebago, Walworth, Watertown. Lancaster, Southport, Burlington, Troy, Suinmit, Wyola, Monroe, Platteville District. 482 1841. 1842. 1843. 1844. 1845. 1846. 1847. 1848. 1849. 1851. 1852. 1853. APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. Potosi, Janesville, Hamilton Grove, Brothertown, Sioux, St. Croix, Prairieville, Green Bay District, Indian Mis- sion District. Sylvania, Sugar Creek, Muscoda, Wisconsin Pinery, Win- n¢ebago Lake. Rock River District, Big Foot, Whitewater, Hazel Green, Highland Prairie, Manitowoc. Blue River, Pewaukee*, Washington Mission. Dodgeville, Sauk Prairie, Union Green Lake, Lowell, Elkborn Menomonee Mission. : Waupun, Mequon, Beloit. Franklin, Black River, Welsh Mission, Columbus, May- ville, Grafton, Waukesha (formerly Prairieville), Pal- myra, Oconomowoc, Prairie du Sac, Racine District, Fond du Lac (in place of Green Bay) District. Elk Grove, Albion, Walker’s Point, Wauwatosa, Reck Prairie, Spring Vailey, Exeter. Patch Grove, Wyoming Valley, Council Hill, Minnesota District, St. Paul, St. Anthony’s Falls, Stillwater, Bad Axe, Sheboygan, Oshkosh, Marcellon, Beaver Dam, Grafton, West Bend, Lodi, Adams, Honey Creek, Geneva, Eagleville, Delavan, South Grove. . Arena, Point Douglass, Chippewa River, Round Prairie, Byron, Plover, Kingston, Fall River, Metoman, Omro, Appleton, Green Bush, Hartford, Bark River, Nor- wegian Mission, Milton, Dartford. Prairie La Crosse, Sun Prairie, Black Earth, Pine River, Baraboo (formerly Adams), Reedsburg, Princeton, Waupaca, Cascade, De Pere, Fox River District, Reed Street, Milwaukee (same as Walker’s Point), Oak Creek, Bristol. Shullsburg, Fayette, Sandy Lake, St. Peters, Willow River, Waukesha, Richland City, Delton, Fond du Lac North Ward, Winneconne, Grove Street (Reed Street), Fox Lake, Portage City. Jackson Street (Milwaukee), South Bristol, Hebron, Montfort, Beetown, Monticello, Montello, Berlin, Fen- nimcre, Kickapoo, Sparta, Benton County Mission, Travers de Sioux, Shakopee, Red Wing, Hudson, Marine Mission, Chippewa, Prairie du Chien District. *Diopped until 1869. DISTRICTS AND PASTORAL CHARGES. 483 1854. Platte, Spring Grove, Lemonwier, Poinette, Waucousta, Orion, Virequa, Mont: llo, Prescott, Reed’s Landing, Kaposia, Mavketa, Minneapolis, Brownville, Monte ville, Luis Valley, Scandinavian Mission (in Minnesota), Racine Welsh Mission, Norwegian Mission (in Fond du Lac District), Wautoma, Fort Atkingon, Lake Mills. 1855. Janesville District, Beaver Dam District, Portage City District, Appleton District, La Crosse District, Red Wing District, St. Paul District, Winona District, Ripon, Evansville, East Janesville, Horicon, Burnett, Algoma, Rosendale, Neenah, Hortonville, Oconto, Charlestown, Saxeville, Welsh Mission (in Winnebago County), Oxford, Roche-a- Cri, Point Bluff, Blue Mound, Waterloo, Jamestown, Rastman, Onalaska, Mendora, Caledonia, Chatfield, Cedar River, Elk Prairie, Ori- noco, Monteville, Hastings, Meridota, Cannon River, Minnetonka, Cottage Grove, Superior. 1856. Appleton Second Ward, Menasha, New London in con nection with Hortonville, Weyauwega, Stevens Puiut, Wausau, Menomonee, Brandon, Marcellon, Fall River, Jefferson, Waterloo, Columbus, West Beloit, Utter’s Corners, Footwille, Coldwell’s Prairie, Clinton (now Clinton Junction), Keewaunee, Empire, Oshkosh Mis- sion, Watertown District, Norwegian District. There had been two Norwegian Missions, one in the vicinity of Neenah, the other in the southern and northwest- ern parts of the State. These teok the following names: Cambridge, Racine, Heart Prairie, Winnebago, Primrose, Viroqua, Richland, Upper Iowa, St. Paul, Minnesota, Beaver. 1857, Newberg, Lynn and Blcomfield, Liberty Prairie, Porter, Lamartine, Michicott, Emerald Grove, Wyccena, Ran- dolph, Cambria Welsh Mission, Greenville, Manchester, Massinee, Grand Rapids, Summerfield (Mil.), Almond, Wautoma, Saxeville, Crystal Lake, Amberst, De Pere, Stevens Point District. 1858. Concord, Waterford, Sharon, Shopiere, Juneau, Eureka, Maple Grove, Buena Vista, Hemlock, Ogdensburg, Chilton, Vinland, Barton, Neosho. _ 1859. New Berlin, Hustisford, Racine Welsh Mission, Edger- ton, Stoughton, Markesan, Seminary Grove, Door Creek, Portland, Auburn, Eldorado Welsh Mission, Brandt, Gipson, Pleasant Prairie. 484 1860. 1861. 1862 1863. 1864. 1865. 1866. 1867, 1868. 1869. 1870. 1871. 1872. 1873. 1874. 1875. 1876. 1877. 1878. 1879. 188}. 1882. 1883. 1884. 1885. 1886. APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. Granville, Genesee, Allen’s Grove, Hebron, Orfordville, Black Wolf, Two Rivers, Shawano. Rome, Mukwanigo, Transit and Oakland Center. Waukau, Gibraltar Mission, Union Grove. Croghville, Iron Ridge, Sturgeon Bay, Washington Har- bor. 4 Pine River. Osborn, N. Osh and Vinland. Cottage Grove. East Granville, Marshall, Division Street and Cotton Street (Fond du Lac), Peshtigo, Suamico, Embarrass. Fox River, North Prairie, Avon and Newark, Hingham, Alto, Pardeeville, South Omro, Fish Creek, Wrights- town, Clintonville, Wilmot (Oshkosh), Second Church, Bay View. Mackfarlane, Avon and Newark, Zion, Pewaukee, Court Street (Janesville), Fort Howard. Clemensville, Marinette, Rio, Menomonee Falls (in place of West Granville). Eureka, Ashland. Utica Center and Zion, SHpEROr City, Penoka. Seymour, Colby, Jenne. Third Church (Oshkosh), Gravesville, Northport, Auro- raville. Algoma Street (Oshkosh, changed from Third Church), Eau Claire. Union and -Dupont. Union Church and New Berlin, Franks and Caledonia, Oconto Circuit, Medford, Spencer. Oshkosh City Mission. Koshkonong, Campbellsport, Oconto Falls, Pittsfield, Par- freyville and Crystal Lake. Kaukauna,* West Pensaukee, Antigo, Dale and Fremont, Tigerton and Nora, Merrill. Union Church (Racine), Ahnape. St. Nathan’s, Poisippi, Simco and Maniwa, West Merrill. Franksville and Ives Grove, Washington Avenue (Mil- waukee), Waterford and English Settlement, Burling- ton and Paris. Eagle River, Maple Valley, \ppleton Circuit. Royalton and Iola, Sherman Street (Milwaukee). *Disappeared till 1886. SPECIAL WORK. 485 1887. Monico and State Line, Rhinelander, Vesper and Rudolph. 1888. Lena and Leighton, Simpson Church (Milwaukee), Trin- ity (Bay View), Milwaukee Circuit, North Greenfield. 1889. Hickory and Oconto Falls, Lima. Py APPENDIX F. APPOINTMENTS TO SPECIAL WORK. Educational. LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY. W. H. Sampson, principal and professor, 1849-1853. Edward Cook, president, 1853-1859. W. H. Sampson, professor, 1853-1857. R. Z. Mason, professor, 1854-1861; president, 1861-1865. N. E. Cobleigh, professor, 1854-1857. F. O. Blair, professor, 1857-1858. E. L. Knox, professor, 1858-1864. W. F. Yocum, professor, 1869. G. M. Steele, president, 1865-1879. C. N. Stowers, professor, 1867-1868. W. C. Sawyer, professor, 1875-1881. B. P. Raymond, president, 1883-1889. N. B.—E. D. Huntley, a member of the West Wisconsin Conference, was president from 1879 to 18838. W. C. Gal- lagher succeeded B. P. Ravmond as president in 1889. Nore.—These were all ministers appointed from Conference, after election by the trustees. In addition, the following named persons served, or are serving, as professors for the periods indicated hy the dates: R. O. Kellogg, . 1849-1853; O. P. DeLand, 1872-1875 Jas. M. Phinney, 1849-1852 | Jas. H. Worman, . . 1872-1876 Jabez Brooks, . 1850-1851 | T. Martin Town, —. 1874-1876 H. A. Jones, v, 1854-1889; D. M. Hyde, . . 1874-1878 Henry Pomeroy, . . 1858-1863] Herbert Perkins, . . 1877-1879 QO. W. Powers, 1858-1860} C. A. Perkins, . . . 1879-1881 Ernst Pletschke, 1858-1860) N. M. Wheeler,. —. 1879-1885 J. F. Kellogg, . - 1863-1867 | Henry Lummis, 7,. 1885-1889 J. E. Davies, . . 1865-1867) F. Cramer,i, —. 1886-1889 J.C. Foye, r,. 1867-1889 | W. Underwood, 1, 1886-1889) A. Schindelmeiser, 1867-1870 | 7, Still in service. 486 ae PRECEPTRESSES., Miss Emelive M. Crocker, ah L. Amelia Dayton, ......... Miss Mary Hastings, ..... Mrs. R. C. Newman Knox, .. ...- Miss Cordelia Sherman, . : Mrs. L.R. Beach, ... ... Mrs. H. O. Knox (Nichols), Miss Emma L. Knowls, Miss Margaret J. Evans, . Miss Louisa M. Hodgkins,. ...... Miss Hattie A. Conant, Miss Mary E. Harriman, Mrs. Ophelia Forward, . Miss Angie V. Warren, . Miss Grace M. Huntingt:n, Miss Kate A. Evi rts, r, OTHER SPECIAL WORK David Brooks, agent, J.S. Prescott, agent, ..-...-. A. B. Randall, agent, ..... H. Requa, agent, St Sey Bh Bi a Asa Wood, agent,... - J. H. Jenne, agent, . 8. C. Thomas, agent, . P.S. Bennett, agent, . . M. Himebaugh, agent, J. P. Roe, agent, . A. A. Reed, agent, .. - T. C. Willson, agent,r, . GARRETT BIBLICAL INSTITUTE. . Bannister, professor, 1858-1883. M. . 8. Carhart, professor Northwestern University, 1872. S. Terry, r, professor, 1887-1889. EVANSVILLE SEMINARY. . A. Smith, principal, 1859. . Colman, principal, 1863-1867. . W. De La Mater, agent, 1863. r, Still in service. | APPENDICES TO PARTS [AND II. » » 1849-1851 » « 1852-1854 Mrs. Electa A. Blair, .. . 3, a as 1855-1857 1858-1859 1861-1863 1863-1864 1864-1865 1865-1868 . 1868-1870 1870-1874 1870-18743 1874-1875 . 1876-1877 . 1877-1880 - 1880-1882 1882-1885 1886-1889 . . 1851-1853 - 1853-1856 1853 1853 1853 1856 - 1857-1861 1861-1863 . 1864-1867 1871-1873 . 1873-1875 1888-1889 SPECIAL WORK. 487 I, H. Hammond, principal, 1867. A. M. Stephens, principal of Waterloo Academy in 1867. C. N. Stowers, of Whitewater Collegiate Institute in 1875. American Bible Society. G. H. Fox, agent, 1859. L, Salisbury, agent, 1864. E. P. Beecher, agent, 1866-1869. Charles Smith, agent, 1866-1871. David Lewis, agent, 1866. H. W. Frink, agent, 1866-1877. S. Reynolds, district superintendent, 1867-1876. A. J. Mead, r, district superintendent, 1883-1889. W. J. Olmstead, agent, 1870-1872. George Fellows, agent, 1872-1873. Bethel, or Seaman’s Friend Work. D. W. Couch, 1864. M. Himebaugb, superintendent in 1867, and from 1874 to 1879. A. H. Walter, chaplain, 1868. C. G. Lathrop, 1869-1872. J. O. Hazleton, 1879. Chaplainctes In the Army. C. D. Pillsbury, 1862. J. M. Walker, 1864. D. O. Jones, 1864. S. L. Brown, 1861. H. C. Tilton, a part of the interim of the Conferences of 1861 and 1862. Foreign Mission-work. I. L. Hauser, India, 1860-1864. L. N. Wheeler, China, 1865-1873; also, 1881-1883. A. E. Wanlass, Bulgaria, 1868-1871. C. Willerup, Norway, 1856-1875. Between these two dates fourteen more were appointed, namely: M. Hensen, A. Oleson, Peter Oleson, C. Rund, Ole Oleson, N. F. Carstensen, C. L. Carlberg, F. Ring, J. Bakke, N. Jonasen, Hans P. Bergh, B. Jorgensen, B. Larressen, Lars Doblong. In 1876 they were all transferred to the newly- formed Norway Confer: nce. Karl Schon, M. Nilson, Jeno Peterson, and J. J, Christen- sen, missionaries to Denmark in 1873. r, Still in service. 488 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. In 1881, Justus H. Nelson and John R. Nelson were ap- pointed missionaries to South America, J. E. Wright to Cen- tral America, and J. J. Garvin to Montana. In 1883, E. B. L. Elder was appointed to Montana, Victor Charroin and E. B. Cummings to Black Hills, and T. H. Walker to Dakota. In 1886, H. O. Cady, missionary to Central China. Miscellaneous. J. M. Walker was temperance agent in 1869, and agent of the Madison Cburch in 1870. S. Fallows was State Superintendent of Public Instruction from 1870 to 1874. J. E. Gilbert, Superintendent of Sunday-school Institute, in 1871. R. Cooley, temperance agent, in 1875. C. O. Treider, editor of Den Christliche Talemand (Christian Advocate), from 1877 to 1879. W. P. Stowe, r, agent of Western Book Concern, from 1880 to 1889. Se APPENDIX G. SPECIAL SERMONS. Missionary. The General Conierence of 1852 ordered the bishops to appoint, at each Annual Conference, one of its members to preach a missionary sermon at its next session. This table shows the appointees each year. 1852. C. Hobart. | 1862. R. Z. Mason. 1853. I. M. Leihy. | 1863. C. D. Pillsbury. 1854. | 1864. S. Fallows. 18565. 1865. G. M. Steele. 1856. Win. McDonald. 1866. H. C. Tilton. 1857. 1867. G. C. Haddock. 1858. I. Searls. 1868. S. Smith. 1859. P. S. Bennett (First Con- | 1869. W. P. Stowe. ference). 1870. 0. J. Cowles. 1859. L. L. Knox (Second Con- | 1871. ference). 1872. O. B. Thayer. 1860. 1873. J. W. Carhart. 1861. 1874. C. N. Stowers. ». Still in the same position. 1875. 1876. 1877. 1878. 1879. 1880. 1881. 1882. DELEGATES TO GENERAL CONFERENCES. 489 L. N. Wheeler. 1883. S. Jolliffe. G. A. Smith. 1884. C. M. Heard. G. C. Haddock. 1885. A. E. Wanlass. F. S. Stein. 1886. W. B. Robinson. H. Colman. 1887. G. H. Trever. Thos. Clithero. 1888. Perry Miller. J. L. Hewitt. 1889. T. DeWitt Peake. I. 8. Leavitt. Other Special Sermons Ordered from time to time as indicated below: 1850. W. H. Sampson, Conference sermon. 1852. E. Yocum, Christian Perfection. 1863. Geo. Fellows, Bible Cause. 1864. H. Bannister, Centenary of Methodism. 1867. P. B. Pease, Conference sermon. The following, to 1875 inclusive, are on 1863. 1864. 1866. 1867. 1868. 1869. 1878. 1879. 1880. 1881. 1882. 1887. 1888. C. Py Education. 8. Fallows. 1870. C. E. Carpenter. 1871. G. M. Steele. 1872. G. C. Haddock. H. Colman. 1873. W. W. Case. C. N. Stowers. 1874. A. C. Higgins. G. A. England. 1875. 8. N. Griffith. Conference Sermons. H. Bannister. 1883. Thos. Clithero. T. C. Willson. 1884. John Faville. P.S. Bennett. 1885. F. L. Whorton. D. J. Holmes. 1886, J. V. Trenery. H. 8S. Richardson. Semi-Centennial Sermons. P. S. Bennett. 1889. C. D. Pillsbury. M. Himebaugh. ° APPENDIX H. DELEGATES TO GENERAL CONFERENCES. 1852. Hobart, W. H. Sampson, H. Summers. 1856. 8. Bennett, I. M. Leihy, Edward Cook, Elmore Yocum, Chauncey Hobart. 41 490 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. 1860. W. G. Miller, I.M. Leihy, S. C. Thomas, Edward Cook, Philo 8. Bennett. 1864. H. Bannister, 8. C. Thomas, C. D. Pillsbury, Matthias Hime- baugh. Reserves—J. H. Jenne, W. G. Miller. 1868. G. M. Steele, W. G. Miller, S. Fallows, Henry Bannister, C. D. Pillsbury. Reserves—S. C. Thomas, Jos. Anderson, E. 8. Grumley. 1872. This year marks the era when laymen were admitted to our General Conference. Hereafter, therefore, delegates-elect will be designated as Ctrrican and Lay. CireRicat—G. M. Steele, P. B. Pease, Henry Bannister, C. D. Pillsbury, W. G. Miller. Reserves—S. Fallows, W. H. Sampson, W. P. Stowe. Lay—R. P. Elmore, Wm. P. Lyon. Reserves—B. Kingsbury, H. A. Jones. 1876. CLEericaL—G. M. Steele, W. P. Stowe, Henry Colman, J. M. Walker. Lay—Daniel Mowe, Edwin Hyde. Reserves—Geo. Rogers, M. D. Moore. 1880. CuirericaAL—L. N. Wheeler, W. P. Stowe, O. J. Cowles, J. H. Johnson, Reserves—A. J. Mead, H. Colman. Lay—R. MeMillen, Z. P. Burdick. Reserves—E. L. Grant, R. P. Elmore. 1884. CiericaL—W. P. Stowe, 8. Halsey, Joseph Anderson, J. M. Walker. Reserves—A. J. Mead, Thos. Clithero. Lay—Geo. Foster, M. D. Moore. Reservee—H. 8. Alban, 8. C. Blake. 1888. CiericaL—B. P. Raymond, W. P. Stowe, Sabin Halsey, Thos. Clithero. Reserves—G. W. Wells, I. S. Leavitt. Lay—Geo. Foster, E.{L. Paine.* Reserves—Mrs. L. 8. Col- man, J. H. Whorton. * The oldest member of the body—over ninety years old. ERECTION OF CHURCH EDIFICES. 491 APPENDIX I. DATES OF THE ERECTION OF CHURCH EDIFICES. It has been exceedingly difficult to secure accuracy in this table. In some instances churches are erected in places not indicated by the name of the pastoral charge; then sometimes the name of a charge is changed, and not unfrequently a place containing a church is transferred to some other charge. It is believed, however, that few mistakes have been made. The reader may remember that in 1832 a log building was erected near Kaukauna for school and Church purposes, in connection with the Indian Mission. Also that a small log structure at Platteville, formerly used as a court-room by Judge Rountree, was converted into a place of worship late in 1833, and thus used till the next year, when it was succeeded by a larger one designed for a school-house as well as Church services. These are not indicated in the following table. In 1850 we commenced to publish our Conference Minutes. At that time 36 church edifices were reported by districts, as follows: Platteville District, 16, Minnesota District, 1; Fond du Lac District, 4; Milwaukee District,6; and Racine Dis- trict, 9. These seem to have been in the following named places. The dates at the left indicate the close of the Confer- ence year during which they were erected. A star indicates that the time of the erection of the church there is unknown, though prior to 1850. 1837. Green Bay, Platteville. 1840. Oneida, Southport (now Kenosha), Kellogg’s Corners (in Sylvania Circuit). 1841. Milwaukee (now Grand Avenue), Waukesha, Mineral Point. 1844. Racine. 1846. Beaver Dam (?), Watertown (?). 1847. Evansville (in Union Circuit). 1848. Whitewater, Walker’s Point (now Asbury, Milwaukee), Janesville. 1850. Madison, Fort Atkinson (in Aztalan Circuit), Beloit, Dartford, St. Paul, Hazel Green, East Troy,* Potosi,* Franklin,* Monroe,* Dodgeville,* Hamilton Grove,* Council Hill, eight.* 492 APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. There is less doubt about the following as they were reported at the Conferences held the years indicated by the dates: 1851. Elk Grove, Adams, Fall River, Oshkosh, Brothertown, Sheboygan, Palmyra (?), Lodi, Oconomowoc, Spring Valley, Milton, Little Prairie. 1852. Lynden, Peddler’s Creek, Lancaster, Baraboo, Waupaca, Fond du Lac (two), Sheboygan Falls, Cambridge (Nor- wegian Church, Grafton, Bristol. 1853. Shullsburg, Patch Grove, Prairie du Chien, Fayette, St. Anthony’s Falls, Plover, Cascade, Omro. 1854. Jackson Street, Milwaukee; West Bend, South Grove, Appleton, Waupun, Berlin, Manitowoc. 1855. Lake Mills, Hebron, Brookfield, Monticello, Sun Prairie, Green Bush, Fox Lake, La Crosse. 1856. Port Washington, Geneva, Horicon, Ripon, Columbus, Menasha, Two Rivers. 1857-1858. No reports in the Minutes. Hence, some of those reported in 1859 may have been erected in these years. 1859. Delavan, Sharon, Allen’s Grove, Clinton, Heart Prairie, Emerald Grove, Utter’s Corners, Stoughton, Shopiere, Lowell, Burnett, Brandon, Princeton, Byron, Ros- endale, Menomonee Falls, Winneconne, Wausau, Weyauwega, Summerfield (Milwaukee), successor to Jackson Street Church. 1860. West Granville, Neosho, Hartford, Waterloo, De Pere, Stevens’ Point, Almond, Crystal Lake. 1861. New Berlin, Lyons, Orfordville, Door Creek, Portland, Randolph, Vinland. 1862. Rome, Wyocena, Maple Grove, Union Grove. 1863. Chilton, North Vinland, Wautoma. 1864. Clinton, Edgerton, Iron Ridge, Neenah, Nekimi, Amherst, 1865. Geneva, Markesan. 1866. Cascade, Oconto. 1867. Cottage Grove, Jefferson, Kingston, Sturgeon Bay, Grand Rapids, Waukau, Liberty Prairie, Zion, Ogdensburg, Northport, Royalton. 1868. Johnston’s Creek, Empire, Shawano. 1869. Marshall, Avon, Pardeeville, Alto, Ogdensburg, Eureka, Bay View, Oshkosh (Second Church), Northport. 1870. Wauwatosa, East Granville, McFarlane, Hingbam, Croghville, Osborne, Marinette, Court Street (Janes- ville). 1871. Pewaukee, Fort Howard, Royalton. 1872. 1873. 1874, 1875. 1876. 1878. 1879. 1880. 1881. 1882. 1883. 1884. 1887. 1888. 1889. ERECTION OF CHURCH EDIFICES. 493 West Bend, Green Lake. Waterford. Ashland, Oakland, Rural. Algoma Street (Oshkosh), Suamico, Oconto Falls, Graves- ville, Auroraville, Hortonville. Franksville, Medina. Peshtigo. Medtord, Spencer. Campbellsport, Mackford, Jenne (now Merrill). Wrightstown, Clintonville, New London. Union Church (Racine), Black Creek, Pittsfield, Pen- saukee. London, or Oak Center. Washington Avenue (Milwaukee), Antigo, Maniwa, Hutchins. Kaukauna, Sherman Street (Milwaukee). Iola, Rhinelander. Simeo, Trinity (Bay View.) 494 SESSIONS OF THE WISCONSIN CONFERENC APPENDICES TO PARTS I AND II. APPENDIX J. E 2 a 5 E TIME. PLACE. BIsHoP.| SECRETARY. & 1848—July 12.|Southport... P.M. Mills ....... 1849—July 17. 1850—June 26 1851 -June 25 1852—Sept. 1.. 1853— Aug. 31. 1854—Aug. 30. 1855—Aug. 29. 1856—Sept. 17 1857—Aug. 20. 1858— May 11 1859—Apr. 20. 1859—Oct. 13. 1860—Sept. 26 1861—Sept. 17/Fond du Lac. 1862—Oct. 6. . |Kenosha .... 1868—Oct. 6....] Waukesha. 1864— Oct. 6... |Oshkosh... 1865—Oct. 6,...| Milwaukee. 1866—Sept. 6..}Ripon ....... 1867—Oct. 2....|Beaver Dam . 1868—Oct. 1. . |Racine..... 1869—Sept. 24 Appleton 1870—Oct. 12.. |Janesville.. 1871—Oct. 11...| Milwaukee. 1872—Oct. 9..../Fond du Lac. 1873—(ct. 15.. | Whitewater. 1874—Oct. 7....]Oshkosh... 1875—Oct. 13.. |Racine.. 1876—Oct. 4....| Waupaca. 1877—Oct. 14...) Waupun . 1878—Oct. 1... |Fort Atkinson 1879—Oct. 2....|Milwaukee. 1880—Oct. 13... Appleton... 1881—Sept. ot 1882—Sept. 28 1883—Oct. 3... 1888—Sept. 26 1889—Sept. 25 . | Waukesha . Platteville. Beloit... ... Waukesha. Fond du Lac. Barabvo .... Janesville Racine.. Appleto Milwaukee. Beloit... .... Sheboygan F Whitewater Janesville . alte Ei Whitewater. Fond du La Milwaukee. Oshkosh . Berlin .... Wa mete Simpson Haven ... Merrill Foster. Wiley... Bowman Foster... Andrews Harris ka? Hurst.... Mallalieu Bowman Merrill... Fowler... Andrews Beaver Dam ...... Newman Hamline . {5. W. Ford. |S. Fallows... . |S. Fallows... .|H. Colman. .|H. Colman. -|H. Colman J. H. Sampson J. H. Wilson..... W. H. Sampson W.H.S W. H. Sampson W.H. Sampson W.G. Miller. W.G. Miller 5. W. Ford. 8S. W. Ford. 8. W. Ford. 8. Fallow: S. Fallow: 3. Fallow! ..{S8. Fallows.. s. Fallows.. 5. Fallows. 8. Fallows. . Fallows... H. Colman H. Colman H. Colman. H. Colman ./Sabin Halsey. Sabin Halsey Sabin Halsey Sabin Halsey... R. W. Bosworth A. P. Haylett.. J. Schneider W. H. Sampson.. W. H. Sampson.. toe! oo a i wprmwow Ww RN OW IN WN ESN” ~zoysueay, Aq poalaooy Non. to! “[BLLL, UO PaaToooyy MISO AT ONDER HORAUYDHHNUNONGNE SOUS 10 TIN UE pos tavayy “stoovaq, paurepsg = Awe RA wep eoewnt = WAIT HWOAMAIWHLAKAWH DH "SOPIT PPUILPAO = = he eh! PNR Pe Re eH ROWE ROOD OH OAT POR CAI ROW OR UONENN ROO ME Ew “+ payvoory ret weep art ors worwire ere?) HHL boepet ~ pappadxq padraysuviy, = WA NwATS epee I WO Rw Ue HT! ww wWapwwwnwne: “eqaead || weet € jaanong “| pa tedug “19T/PAL ION “9g! pa, tadug Za po, tedug ZI}pa,zedug]" OL8T” 6S8T 6981)" [esi GERI QISUODS AL “HIOX MON BUULY "T euasng Naetteencens |e ony Op “of TL YIO.L MON|OUIU AL’ AA THEY ATE AL puLvypaipy] "ULogsg sEMOgy, * earn, stjing ‘gq Weqney “IBIY oe GEST acd . =P “9181 “Typed “GLSL ‘op pudyt: OES “GIST ‘OZ “AVIV SIS ‘Ley “TIT ‘EL “AON QUST “orgy sae] Tome “AL TUL 19T) PAO aL GIST 1 AKT C|FEST “"PESL' rues * puyol “TTA uyoy Z| pe aadng “ZL8T ‘GT [dy |" SET “Te YIOK MAN] TTP XOOTT AL SBULOUT, Pe] patadnsy o R781)" “OBIT ‘L ABW oo TOUTS \ Upuoppe,) wloIny g [padedus S98 ‘Bast ‘——— Te SOTR AL ‘soy saTT SveMoyyL 0g) pea,tedug g |pa,tadng 9T|pa,aeadng eT} po,aadng STPAoopa ‘erst ‘T AIne “9T8T 06 “90 aaa " “ame]y PPG OU S "HH SAMT qnoroando) S[ivaw overs] MoToauUo9D]" “TOISTTLOH G semory, purpsug | Taysoq. ARLOO+) “YO MON] “tnbay suey “IBY Cgst ‘Fz “dog S98t GT Avy a Ae an 9 “avy JOANT Yooryy” Z@ featpoapa eggt ‘24 “uel “UISHODSEAQ | OU LZNT {9 APOE MoTPIUUOD] "SRT ay “O SNPNMOY “WO jPAtoonyy 8281 I ART oo RAIONT UWOSA0} Ie] PATA POL G PAQINT TM] OST S “YIOR MON] TOppeyN “Mv qdasoc: SLOUNLT |” GUST 0S “PO LGBT) or ursuoasE Ag fn GFE] TU ISMOOST AA “got '— ey “utsuoost ay] 1Z8T ‘8 Arne zoxt ‘ead ¥ |" Tagt ‘— "ydag]" v9st *— "PO eg! “GT euny LEST 10 9681 ‘-—— “lgeg] 40 FST —— POST ‘6 indy | 0) OD oni Bnnde A teres QATLG) FT[ pa, tadng Pp [pe tadu Tr]petedug 6 ORO ~yuouise (| “avoug yy uBYyyVUOL ee aes Sty Ay SVELOL TL, pur taryg| ° Aanqsuryy peraed [IO X MON | WOSXvpy ‘s “]_ satus Yo T MON] MOSMRAT ‘N Wasey “deMoN | uraag janweg YOR MAN |YoVyogue a‘ ¢ Aruay IOX MON atqvunog ‘9 "H “OSST ‘E * ba “TE Jat oauar [8% 91 DO MOULO TOI] E ‘TISt ‘Tz ‘Ainge * SlOULL[T “wosmidg nq b GPBT Lo srst! a4 BAMLONT Jeary yooy| ree puryady “7 YSy somes 9 beeen $2] 'SFST “oa hua" UD LIAL YOY] OZST ‘GL “AON SOTVAL SIMO'T J, qdesor 9 jaatpooya [be] SEST ‘(2% OOP A OOUT Se “TIANT YOoy | VOSE “LBW YIOL MON DVUTTIT A 981004) glelsielg| =: |: nee BS lets| os : ie is z ‘ Blzlzlzig| 2= : Hatt ALON UN WoL AL “OLOTM. :|8] = B/E os : “SaINY & AlA|nIa 23 3 es Se = a N = 2 eciaaia a “AONTU A NOD : suvax | 3 4 TAS YIU AC aaNIO£ NHOg 6 co 8I—Lb81 ‘JONIYIINOD NISNOOSIM FHL 40 SHSEW3W GISVIIIG ‘SI XIGNAddy 1,19d0g)PL] "S881 {FZ “AON” SEM ‘OL0|TLBI “FIeT 08 BUY Pome DURBUGT] PERT “ML pa,radns “GQ8T ‘1G UBL)" STAN ‘STINT O2VT|1E81 “g08T ‘9 “ydag|sseyy' pxLoypog S60 N° po,dedng SSSI ‘GI AON] “SEM “tOATY OULT/6G8T “BB8T ‘LG “VOT °N ‘10g “aatpoayy gest ‘go BNV] "SEAL “USONGSO] * ost ‘F ady * pursuq “L881 “BE '3OO| "SEAN ‘STILE OV T/99811" “SPST TE GOL YIOK MON “gest ‘Fe Wd TL ‘proysoou | LEST “Q6LI ‘0% “dV yIOX MON ee “8881 Te UBPp STA, ‘VYSeANE AA |GSST OSS T ABT YIOK MIN “gest ‘oe Id | "ET "AIED Sateug |ses1 “gost ‘61 dv “yIOX MON ~vgger ‘go [dy “aR y 'voamag|.g81 “SES FZ IVIL “Orgy” “gear ‘6 ‘adag}qaN ‘Wosun}}V [PSsl “OR8E “23 “TE “H10K MON “ aprAsuBasy] aeasabareweses gl ‘poteme pt wosuIqoy “A pe,tedng "BOON IBLEL UISTODST AA |"“LFST ‘0 “AON |” SSB ‘StTUCPY “N SsaMoH 'S “1 pa, godng f “qaN ‘ByBUO|0GsT]" “~epreug| "6280 ‘26 “Suv AN ‘oman “pve dV pa,tedng oe smOAT|LGSE] “7 OISMOOSTAA| “LIST “08 AUT)’ AN “UAvcoqad1091) “saosied “DL pa,radng Uvy 4}OUIeH|FEsllOIO WIIGWON|TIST ‘IT Bay] qynoryoeuuo,)] > KopUNAL) ‘Sg “OT pa,tedng Dale pay ‘qsoYqSO|FSsT UISMOOSTAA |" TZST ‘TZ “98 “SOTEAL UPION “" somo ‘Od pe,zedng BAOLr) 8, U9[TV /SEs SEOUNTIT |" FT8T ‘g mee oe'pue[sagy AODOTM “AH "AL “jaatqapay oVT Np PUT |CPST sasau9|GTST “LQ 02 “ YIOK MON ~AotpaN “0 “VW aatpooyy er TOdIY |GhST IOATY YOO * sruvapAsuudd |" TOX[eAL “IW ydesor . TOUT |SL81] 7 ISTOOST AL * epeued| - Uospregory some = STAL ‘OUT V|898T]"*"** UISTOOST A * eruvaAsuuag |aoyusog ‘J, ssurmuer “GaN ‘SBUTJSBT SPST] UISMOOST AA oo guIey| * sesiey “A WRIT UOUIa A “YA ‘Arnqsusesy)| "Aaa A TeyyeuoL Bprouo)“ZI8E ‘g “490 “sseAl ‘AvMmoO] raysruueg ATE “"lverer ‘oe oun] SI Al ‘P2UOTOUATT|WOSs[ON WoRMIN UYyOr “WUTTY “BOSE AA | FEST “TLL W0ysme Ag |ZP8 I ae Tevig “eed |"" pa,zadng 9ATPOOHA aaspoyi pe,zedng sseyy ‘puelqsry |9est| 7 aurleyq|” + OUIV]T pa zadng ess “UISTOOST AL ; DATPOPA ZS8T “WISMOOSI AL s}Josuyousse yl |" pe,zedng 9OMOTUOMOIO!Z381 “UISMOOST AA “purl sivyy |" pleaoay vT yjenwieg 9 p [Teg]/Pe,tedng}19}""6L8T ‘9% TWOIeW oe OTTLASOUB CEPT “ OUTeT = gmreyy | Oy LL O WehyezeH nay “16T/2A09RT “ELST ‘08 ABA wodyy|6o8 1] “a TsMOOST MM | LIST “6G “WEL” YIOK MON eel TI22/ P2,.tedns “LUBY ‘G “AON ued Toavog|OFST eploeug]OIST ib ‘oact|" YOR MON ae 21] ]pa.tedug “LIST ‘Gg AUC] PAT “Guvseatd “WC] “ OLqO}" "BIS L —— eet: Borys UWeHTEM alslsibi2] of: |; d =lglululs| 8a : cue) ‘are = “yet “way ‘aa ABlelzlsleg] eee]: TM OTM = FEU TM TAA (S/S S12] esa}: = “SUNVN s S| & a 4 DIA|A) As ¢ =a 50a oe *HONAVAANOD i “Suva A 3 2 aasvaorqd GaNror NUOg "688I—1b81 ‘JONINIINOD NISNOOSIM FHL 40 SHISWIW G4ASV3IDId » APPENDICES TO WEST WISCONSIN AND NORTHWEST WIS- CONSIN CONFERENCES. + NOTE.—All the references to Appendices in Part III re- late to the above Conferences. APPENDIX A. NUMBER OF MEMBERS, PREACHERS, AND PASTORAL CHARGES EACH YEAR. WEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. YEAR. z ee 3 Pie lagi |e | #2 | 3" ee & 4 Z 2 2 abe : oa : go fee Pac ee | Pee yi [ig 1856, . 4,926) 823) 129| 67 ] 4 4,998} 71) 10 1857, . 5,480} 1,378] 133} 84). 4 5,568] 82) 5 1858, . . 6,161] 3,343) 156} 87 1 4 6,263 86} 10 1859, . 7,489} 1,911) 165} 94) 1 4 7,583) 93) 12 1860,# 7'158| 1'399| 139| 69]. .| 5| 7/232) 79] 10 1861, . 7,107; 925) 141) 67 10 7,184, 77) 13 1862, - 6,958} 821] 131| 68). . 7 7,033} 70) 4 1863, 6,236| 1,267/ 138; 64|. .| 8| 6,308) 67) 4 1864,. .| 6,829| 669] 140] 64. .| 5] 6,898} 72/10 1865, « 6,199] 743/115) 70; 3| 9| 6,281| 73] 6 1866,. .| 6,337| 1,065] 135) 63] 4) 14/ 6,428, 71] 8 1867, . 6,932) 1,268) 148/ 68) 3) 13 7,016} 76) 8 1868,f 10,514} 1,653} 209) 100 2} 16) 10,632) 117) 21 1869, . 10,481} 1,785} 185; 108 5} 12) 10,556) 111); 10 1870,. .| 11,065] 1,658] 200] 108) 7} 10} 11,190) 117) 11 1871, . 10,594} 1,360) 186) 111 3; 8}: 10,716) 118 7 1872, 10,623) 1,583) 184) 113 4 9} 10,749} 124) 18 1878, . 10,638) 1,063] 169) 117 6} 10; 10,771) 122 9 1874,. . 11,178] 1,309! 183] 114 31 14) 11,309) 119! 11 1875,. .| 10,743] 13141] 192] 118] 5] 11| 10,877) 126) 7 1876, . 11,018} 1,803) 173) 123} 8} 12) 11,161} 121 3 1877,. .| 12,094] 1,411] 170/ 121) 7] 11] 12,233] 122) 7 13} 18! 12,040; 117] 12 1878,. .| 11,901! 1,168] 125] 113 * Northwest Wisconsin Conference organized. + Northwest Wisconsin Conference merged in West Wisconsin. 498 APPENDICES TO PART III. z 7 Oo) 8) _ 2|/,2 4 vy y g & |F8/FF/Bsl2s| Fog | Sk | Ze YEAR. g = £=/ es 28 E'S ene ES 58 8 6 |& |Bs|S8' 18 ) Bes | gel ee # Bo fe ee bee ie ee | # | Be eet eee ie PEE |: gz 1879,. .| 11,812] 1,163} 142) 115) 12) 14] 11,953} 120] 7 1880, .| 11,544) 906] 138} 114) 16] 14) 11,688} 124] 12 1881, .| 11,188} 716) 131] 105} 14} 15| 11,272} 121] 15 1882,. .| 10,965) 624) 120) 105! 12) 13) 11,092) 130] 20 1883, .| 10,240] 585) 118) 110} 8] 12/ 10,370; 125) 14 1884,. .] 10,702} 910] 123) 109} 10) 13) 10,844) 131) 25 1885,. .| 10,835} 929) 112} 109} 14] 16! 10,974] 129] 25 1886, .| 11,703] 1,024) 111) 102} 13) 18] 11,836} 130| 27 1887,. .| 12,037} 1,167] 108] 103} 14] 17] 12,171} 138] 33 1888,. .| 12,494] 1,668] 108] 114) 16] 18} 12,642} 145] 38 1889,. .| 18,513! 1,967] 107| 122] 12] 19] 13,666] 144| 32 NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. 1860,. . 1,771) 520) 20) 38). .) 2 1,811) 42) 6 1861,.. 2,027/ 385} 31) 33]. 3] 2,063) 37] «6 1862,.. 1,939} 300} 40) 36] . 3) 1,978) 35) 5 1863, 2,132) 369} 38) 34). .| 4) 2,170] 37] 4 1864,. . 2,227] 381] 32) Qs}. . 3; 2,258] 36) 9 1865,. . 2,260| 445} 41) 31/ 4] 2/ 2,298] 38] 8 1866,.. 2,573) 597/ 39) 33) 3) 4! 2,613] 43] 14 1867,. . 2,796] 555! 45 34/ 2] 4| 2,836] 46] 11 APPENDIX B. BENEVOLENCES. WEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ow 5 we! of} BI, =| 5 ° g Pele |: Si 2e/ee| 2) ee g)f ji jee|s2) "| 3 1856, |$1,115|$153] $48] $34/$113 1857, 999| 196) 84) 12) 142 1858,#- | 662) 79) 124) 1) 2 1859, - | 843} 80) 396) 12) 40 1860,t- | 1,270) 40) 132} 6] 57 1861, - | 2,094] 69} 86] 40! 62 * This Conference year was only six months. | +The Northwest Wisconsin Conference organized this year. BENEVOLENCES. 499 a wo 3 ~ = B of = x =i = at fee] © = aa se | =2 year | B [EE] 2 | ; g= |: 2 | ou : |B8] & ey ese ce ere ee eae 1862, + /$1,704! $71] $157] $32) $65 1863, - | 2727! 144] 105] 74] 132 1864, - | 2,812] 169] 370] 77| 92 1865, | 2,904] 191] 492] 65) 86 ; 1866, 3,849] 197] 770] 58] 112/8230 1867, - | 3,078] 468/1,330} 86] 167] 958] . 1868, - | 4,846] 737] 1,552] 135} 241! 390) $s9 1869, | 4,867] 534] 1,338! 95] 179] 293) 26 1870, 3,517} 4621 1,021) 89) 192] 332] 38). . ns 1871, | 3,461} 518] 1,139] 78 153] 309} 46] $64 $18 1872, 3,034) 514 77; 129] 306} 120] 54 32 1873, | 3.282} 599 74] 95| 279} 93| 78 37 174, 2,809] 461 64, 112) 239) 97] 151). 67 1875, - | 3,326] 518) . | 66] 103, 382/ 187) 102 40 1876, | 2,502] 4085] . .| 55} 75 310} 169) 142 58 1877, + | 2,876] 492/230) 68} 80! 437) 255) 160 2 1878, 2,327| 433) 97/ 61, 91; 310] 341) 193 51 1879, 2,704] 450) 75] 63) 75) 358, 240 196 124]. 1880, 2,544, 528) 77) 70 124] 421] 268! 299 727| $789 1881, - | 3,172) 497] 93/76; 106) 406) 287] 268 189) 681 1882, | 3,239] 539} 132) 79) 93, 417, 292) 485 239] 251 1883, | 3,382) 518) 111) 70} 81: 387) 283] 479) | 284] 413 1884, 2,956) 540| 119| 75 75) 334] 304) 458| $7) 518] 141 1885, 3,354] 708] 95] 63, 82, 323) 846] 430/ 9) 509/1,742 1886, 3.579] 715) 104} 80 106: 379! 565] 624] 88) 516|1,018 1887, | 4,326) 772/ 151] 86 113! 438] 475! 499} 349) 504/1,424 1888, 4,444) 824, 177] 100, 122! 438] 532| 623) 823] 574] 611 1889, - | 5,565! 938) 157] 147) 172: 610) 692! 844] 605] 518] 863 NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. 1860, 98) 1 ees 1861, 181} 6 30 9 25 1862, 176} Of 8} 2 1s 2 1863, 459) 121 18 14° 56, | | 1864, 419} 28) 36 36 56 | 1865, 850, 21] 35 16 57...) 1866, 953; 64) 531 45 96) 152]. 1867. 7741 27| 597 29 45) 149] 18]. . ais * The Northwest Wisconsin Conferenee merged this year in this Con- ference. 500 NUMBER OF CHURCH EDIFICES, VALUATION ; APPENDICES TO PART IT]. APPENDIX C. Parsonages, Valuation; Number of Sunday-schools, Officers WEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. and Teachers, Scholars and Conversions. “STOTSIOAUO;) » » 127 197 384 527 455 534 375 417 427 585 708 459 YEAR. dS 5 g 5 be BS = a7 S 5 Bee | ee a e 5 3 5 SZ) #8 : : ; : ; Be | be 1856, 36}. 2. | 19)... © | 118) 981) 4,662 1857, 37| $41,970] 29) $12,890] 142/1,188] 6,054 1858, 42) 55,700} 32} 13,950) 151) 1,274) 5,713 1859, 47| 70,350] 34| 15,400} 226)1,731) 7,315 1860, 46} 62,925) 32) 18,400) 194/1,748) 8,274 1861, 59) 75,150| 31} 12,725) 186)1,849} 8,244 1862, 59| 71,475] 32) 13,175] 190/1,766] 8,819 1863, 68| 83,900] 35! 14,380] 177/1,670| 8,782 1864, 78} 107,100] 36) 14,975} 192/1,822) 10,008]. . 1865, 71) 101,670] 36] 16,725] 152/1,519] 8,026 1866, 83] 128,025] 43]/ 22,350} 168] 1,828] 10,291]. . 1867, . . .| 86] 161,650] 45) 28,675) 214}2,120; 11,399] . 1868,* 125] 270,250] 72] 52,575] 327)2,907| 16,194 1869, 126] 295,111] 70] 57,300) 291]2,766) 15,066 1870, 137| 336,325) 71] 57,710) 299|2,798| 15,86 1871, . | 137] 340,420) 70) 55,525} 272)/2,576) 15,760 1872, 1373] 383,560| 70| 52,800) 280/2,512| 14,782 1873, 139! 361,950] 70| 59,100) 275) 2,364) 14,776 1874, 170} 408,400] 76| 58,800} 312) 2,784) 16,720 1875, 177| 439,005] 79) 63,200) 284/ 2,493) 16,009 1876, 182) 457,876) 81] 63,577} 305) 2,520) 15,262 1877, 187| 461,445) 85] 70,995} 314] 2,696) 17,056 1878, 182| 468,650] 83/ 64,070} 293]2,582] 15,964 1879, 183] 445,200) 81} 62,603} 304) 2,629) 15,675) . 1880, 192} 426,725] 84| 64,790) 270) 2,355; 14,089) . . 1881, 200) 442,175} 84} 68,065) 276) 2,293] 14,082). . 1882, 200| 446,725} 81) 71,825) 253/2,210| 14,173 1883, 206} 464,145] 82] 80,725) 224) 2,023) 12,613]. . 1884, 216] 483,430) 87! 80,050} 256) 2,257} 14,259) . 1885, 220} 492,313) 89) 84,525) 255)2,309) 14,783). 1886, . . | 228] 501,835) 88} 84,750) 278) 2,361) 15,274! . 1887, . |2263| 533,025} 89) 91,465) 284) 2,478) 16,807| . 1888, 231| 541,730; 91) 94,700) 286/ 2,668 17,430]. . 1889, 243) 560,375) 97! 104,654! 2981 2,687! 19,2101. . * Northwest Wisconsin merged in this. CHURCH EDIFICES—NAMES OF PREACHERS. 501 NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. ° < y 4 z ° p ° : B 1G) 8 (|3e) ae] F | s i : ‘ 3 ay | ia i f 1860, ... 7 $14,200 5} $1,700; 69} 433] 1,918) 26 1861, aod 10) 13,600) 15 4,375} 96) 600} 2,578) 30 1862, ... 1] 11,950) 11 3,300) 105} 710} 3,064) 36 1863, . 13} 16,575) 12) 4,050] 99] 645) 3,060) 40 1864, 5 14} 18,850) 15 5,370} 97) 628] 3,204; 55 1865, . 15} = 23,050) 15 6,700} 89} 647; 3,176] 60 1866, .. 16} 33,450) 17 6,800} 108) 789} 4,079). . 1867, ... 25) 54,700! 21 11,450! 94. 8481 38,8741 91 APPENDIX D. NAMES OF PREACHERS FIRST AND LAST APPEARING IN THE CONFERENCE MINUTES. The left-hand date shows when the relation commenced, the right-hand date when it ceased; also the number of years effective as far as it could be ascertained prior to his coming among us, with the number of years he has since been effect- ive, supernumerary, superannuated, or presiding elder. When no date appears on the right of the name, the person is still connected with the Conference. The letter / opposite the name and date indicates that he located that year, d that he died, ¢ that he was transferred to some other Conference, e that he was expelled, w that he withdrew from the Confer- ence and connection, r that he was removed from our bounds by Conference division. If a date appears on the right of a name, but no letter, the person was then discontinued. WEST WISCONSIN AND NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCES. it lai Leet $22 |G22 |Fe8 YEAR. NAME. = S 25 2 gs” Year. REE |EIE |e o Pee ee es 1856 |Alfred Brunson, 14] 23] = 14} 1883, d. “ |Joel Brown, 9 : 1868, /. “ \John Bean,. . 14} 1880, d. “« |W. H. Bunee, - is 2 1858, 1. “ \Edwin Buck,.... . 11 1866, w. 502 APPENDICES TO PART III. m ee ey bt] ico oe 4 oe ae” agg AR, ; 3h YEAR. Name. 78 Ee el 35 YEAR . . | 1856 |\John Blackhurst, 4 - | 1859, d. 10 «JR. W. Barnes, ] 9 1} 1865, 7. 7 “ !Nelson Butler, 5 12 38 - | 1870, e. “J. Burlinghame,... . 2 - | 1858. ss “ \J. C. Brainerd, 12 4 » | 1874, t. 7 “ \E.S. Bunce, ... . 22 J - | 1878, ¢ 3 “|M. Bennett, . . 8 7 3] 1870, w. NO GOOky sane oa ee 2 34 ‘ ee eset “lA. Callender,. . . 1 1] 1857, ¢. 1 ““ \M. Crownover, ’ 2 | 1858. 2 “1A. G. Cooley, . 10 - | 1867, e. 4 “\L. M. Cochran, ... . Blemee G - | 1859, 2. 4 “|Robert Delap,.. . - 9) 10 - | 1871, 7. 4 “|W. F. Delap,... - 33). Al es 2 “|Samuel Dodge, iy. . - | 1866, d. 5 “ IR. Dudgeon, es 23) «11 Sloe ees 1 “\R, Fancher, .. . - 16 ] - | 1872, #. ae “ |Seth W. Ford, : 1 »| 1857, t. 2 “ IR. Gould, grat 10) 22) . .| 1887, d. 12 “yw. B. Hazletine, 26 7 4) 1888, d. he ‘1M. Himebaugh, 4 : 4) 1859, t. 1 “ |Z. S. Hurd, . : 12 1 - | 1869, 7. e 4 “ |Jas. Hightshoe, . 8) 20 - | 1886, d, 1 “ !C. P. Hackney, .. . 23} = 10 Ay eg he es “ |G. Hartshorn,... . 2 s - | 1858. 3 “|W. Harvey,..... 13 : - | 1869, 7. os “ (Wm Haw,.... 33 : 10) 1888, d. aes “JE. C.Jones,.. . 4 5] > 4] 1864, w. #18 “ —|O. B. Knudson,... . 3 - | 1864, ¢. ae “ |J. S. Lake, 16 . 1872, 1. 2 “ IR. Langley, . . 15 7 1874, d. 6 “ \Jas. Lawson, 34 : Bleed rae “Wm. Mullen, . 7 8 - | 1866, ¢. 5 ““!D. McIndoe, ... . 5} 10 - | 1871, 1. co “ \J. W. Miller,. . =. 6 3) 1861, 7. 8 “JA. MeWright,... . . 5 -| 1861, 7 #9 « \John Murrish, ‘ 8 - | 1862, 7. ee “IN. Mayne, ....-- 5 : - | 1860, 7. 9 “© /W. M. Osborne,. . . 10 1 1} 1866, t. re “Joseph Odgers, . . 6 - | 1862, t. Ri Page, wae es 1 : . | 1856. 4 “ \J.T. Pryor,....+- 20 8 4) 1883, d. 2 “ |Harvéey Palmer,. . 7 : 1862, q EG “ 1J.S. Prescott,. .-.. 1 1857, 1. NAMES OF PREACHERS. 503 ead | ap le ie == sy : sh YEAR. NAME. Dx & BE on : 38 Yar. ies ze| 2 3|i BS i as 43| 89flige 8 | 1856 |Jesse Pardun,... . 1 ] 1858, 7. a ‘* lJohn Quigley,. .. . - 1 1 1858, 1. 4 “« \E. B. Russell,. . . . - 28 1 me ia SS 1 « IR Robotham,.... . 74 1867, 7. 2 “ . \Jas. Sims, ‘ : 34). aa ey 39 “« /W. Summersides, - 8 5 1868, d. “ \I. M.Stagg,. 2... 1 d 1857, 7. “« \E. H. Sackett, . 8 15 - | 1874, 7. ‘ “ 1A.G. Smith, ..... 1 . | 1856. ar “« lJ.C.Spellum,.... . 4 - | 1860, t. tL: “ JH. H. Smith, . . 6 -| 1861, 7. 5 “ JE. Tasker, . .. +: 26 4) 1880, d. Rte “ \James Temby : 6 3 - | 1864, 1. ae ‘“* \Isaac Trotter,....- - 3 : 1859, 7. 5 “|W. H. Thompson. . - 1} 32 - | 1888, d. ae “ A. H. Walter, . 11 . 7| 1866, t. 5 “ \Henry Wood, . 2 6 - | 1863, 7. 14 “ 10, E. Wyrich, . 8 - | 1863, d. 5 «| M. Wells, . 19, 5]. | 1888, @. 1 ‘* |Nelson Wheeler, 4 - | 1859, e. 25 “ IW. Wilcox, - 9 11| 1864, d. 10 “ RR. Wood,. We 3] 1863, 7. 23 “ |7. L. Williams 7 20 + | 1881, d. ‘ 1857 |R. Burge,. . - Ti - | 1864, 7. “J.B. Bachman, . 31 2 as “ |@.T. Clifton,..... 1 : 1858. “ “\F. Carver, ze 1 1858. “ \A. Foster, . : 4 1860, ft. “ |J RE. Fiteh,. . . . 2 1859. “IR. M. Delap, . - - 6 1863, 7. “ \John Holt, . . - 33 ideas “ \C..C. Holcomb, 10 1866, 7. “A. V. House, 1 1858. “ \R. Z. Mason ihe 4 . 1860, ¢. ‘“ |\Thos. Mason,. ...- .- 5 : 1861, 7. “« 1G. W. Nuzum, ee 19 9 Spears “ lJohn Nolan... . . a). ie 1860, 7. “|W. Owen,. : 8} 25 Me he “ “I. E. Springer, 7 : 1873, ¢. “ JA. L. Thurston, - 3 7 1859, e. “ lH. C. Wood, - - 5 . 1861, 7. 4 “ lJ. J. Walker, de +k 17 9) . | 1883, 7. 20 “ Elmore Yocum,.. .- - 28 4) 4s e 4 “(John Knibbs,. . .- - 27 1. 1884, d. 504 APPENDICES TO PART III. ~ aS | pcaia “ 2" | year. Name. : oe ae” Sigg YEAR. se “Bleae |i os 28 oa lB a |! BS dg aa |seF li ah 5 | 1858 |S. Anderson, ..... 3 1860, d. -_ «\8. D. Bassenger, . . 7 1864, d. 3 “A. C. Barnes, . 1 1859. z “ |Henry Coleman, . 1 1859, ¢. ‘ “ /T. C. Clendening,. . . 4 1861, J. : “ }A. Cedarholm, 10 ; 1867, d. 2 “« \M. Dinsdale, 18} 18 sel aes cae “Samuel Fallows, . AY Ge . | 1861, t. ; “IE. 8. Hougnayout 4 . - | 1861, 2. 6 “1A. Hall, 7 1 . | 1869, d. 7 * IPoS. Mather, ehh. 46 22 : 6) 1879, t a “ IW. CG. McAllister, a. ] : - | 1859. “ 1G. W. Peck,.. ... 1 5 1859. es ‘““ |Peter Pearson, a4 9 1 1866, d. peg “ \John M. Springer, .. - ih aM ee. 1864 d. oe “« |J. D. Searles, 30 3 13} . 1 | “ JH. V. Train, oy 5 3 4 1862, 1. ahs “ |D, Budlong,......- 3 2 : 1862; Le 27 | 1859 |J. C. Aspinwall,... . 19} 10 9} 1887, d. i ‘|W. Barrett, Ae 7 - | 1866, 7. os “ \w. A. Chambers,. . . 5 : 1863, ¢. ee “|A. D. Chase, 4 7 1869, 1. Bs “ TW. Carl, . . gq} ..) . .) 1862. 4 “ \T. C. Golden, 9 1 8) 1867, 1. Bes ““ \A. Haagenson, 10). . - | 1869, &. ae “J. E. Irish, 26 4 ily boas ae * |Thos. Lawson, 24 6 : se “ \John Medd, . 27 3 Bi ae ws as a3 “ \Jacob Miller, 11 6 - | 1876, 7. bs ‘“« |Lester Perkins, . 5}. . | 1864, 1. aa “ |W. H. Palmer, . 10 1 - | 1874, d. .. | © (JW. Scott, . 6. 4, .| . .| 1863, 2. #3 “ |B. W. Smith, . . 4 ; . | 1862, 1. £3 «1s. P. Waldron, 18 4 - | 1880, J. ie “|Asa Wood, es dat SL Peg . | 1860, 2. : “ )W. D. Attwater, . ; 25 4 2| 1888, t. . . | 1860 |C. P. Argrelius,. .. . 3 3 1869, t. e “ |John S. Anderson, 6 ; 1866, t. aie ‘“ JH. H. Brakeman, 14). 1874) l. fae “ !Wm. Cook,..... 22 4 ‘ ‘ é “ \A. W. Cummings, 17 4 ‘ ‘1881, t. ah “ 1D. Clingman,.... .- 29 ‘ eis : mors «|W. T. W. Cunningham, 6 2 5 1868, t. 9 “ |R.Cobban,.....-.- 5 4 3| 1870, d. NAMES OF PREACHERS. 505 as eh | tol we oF i o| YE T i‘ a . s & 718 ve ris 58 YEAR. NAME, 8 BF s, : ge YEAR zz ge |8 3): 6S ae 83 | SSR iaa 2 | 1860 jJas. Cady, . 5 4 1868, d. 5 “ |J. L. Dyer, Les 1861, “ \E. Doughty,. . s| 12 1880, d. “1D. W. Downs, . it 1 : . | 1861. “TI. M. Fullerton,. . . 929 9 7| 1889, d. “|Nelson Green. . 1 : 1861, ¢. “Jas. Gurley,.. 6... 2 g| . .| 1871, t “ |Wm. Hamilton. ... 24 5 HB |e ee 3 “ |G. F. Hilton, re ting. 1 286 “ \E. S. Havens, . 14 1874, ¢. “ /Thos. Harwood, . 6 1869, 4. “ \0. C. Hickock, z 1 . . | 1861. “ |Chauncey Hobart,.. . 4 2} 1864, t. “|B. L. Jackson,.. .. . 13 3 . | 1876, e. “A. T. Johnson, 2 1862. “|W. McKinley, . rar 3 1863, ¢. « | T Magill)... 3 || 1863, & “J. B. Reynolds,. ... 13) « 4] 1874, ¢. “« |Levi Shelly, . . 2 6). . | 1868, 4. ‘“‘ |Esdras Smith, . 6 . . | 1866, 6 « JAB. Smith... .. Gl at us | 166, & “ |I. A. Sweatland, 9} 12) . . | 1880, d. “ \M. Woodley, ... . 11] 12 |S ee « “|S. M. Webster, ... . 3 1863, J. 1861 |Thos. Bintliff, ’ ; 1) <5 | Ge. | 1882. “ |A. D. Cunningham, .| . . 2) . . | 1863, ¢. ‘“‘ \Harvey Fletcher, . . . 9 . | 1863. “|John L. Farber, . 3 Sill ag 1864, 1. “ |S. A. Hall, . 3 2 . | 1866, 2. “|C. Steenson, 1 . .| 1862. “ lJ. W. Stout,. .... 3 1864. “|W. W. Wilde,.. . 3 1864, 7. “|W. H. Brocksome,. . 6 1867, t. “Stephen Adams,. . 1 1862, 1. 1862 |J.8. Akers,.. .. 5 1867, t. “ |G. W. Carpenter,. —. 3 1865. ‘“( \H. Chadeayne, ... . 7 1870, ¢. “|Jas. Evans, ..... 27 dig e dk “ |E. E. Edwards,... . 1 ‘ . | 1863. WP. Hill... : 7 2 e870, ‘“‘ \Samuel Harris, ... . 1 . |. . | 1863. “ \J. T. Hofius, 4 1}. . | 1867, 2. “ |A. B. Howe,. . 3 . . | 1865. “|W. H. Kellogg, 16 4 . 42 506 APPENDICES TO PART III. wd a Ee ani gees ga Oru loba lo a sf YEAR. NAME. : 78 Ee rae YEAR. Se BEETS |: BS a4 4s |ee5li ae 1862 |Matthew Serin,. .. . 1 1) 1863. 1863 |G. L. Blessing, .. . 1 . | 1864. “10. Bushby,.. ... 13 1876, t. “ JB. Collins, ..... 5} . . | . | | 1868. “ \B.C. Hammond, . . . i) 3). «| 187], ¢. “ |H. D. Jencks,. . : 2G | ap age aes aes Migrants uae “« \J. W. Jobnson,.... Dh 8 1865. “ |O. B. Kilbourn,. . . . 15} JO) « @ eee © VG. Wi, Pike, 3 a 6 « % By esas 1868, 1 « /W.W. Smith,... . 6) . .| . . | 1869, 2 “Ww. W. Wheaton, . . . DG occ lft otarece-spunge ieee ae “ 0. N. Whitney, . - 1 1]. .| 1865, 7. . “ \A. Wheeler, .. ly]. .] . . | 1864, 4. 5 a TS; -Aldriehy oa qo a ae 3 7 1). .| 1871, 2. 1864 |S. S. Benedict,..... 25). erin e “ |George Benham, . . 25) . . j ‘“ |Thos. Crouch,.. . . 19 Al cul a Ny Se “ |E. McGinley, ... 20 2 . | 1886, d. * 10. P. Peterson, 3 4). 4| 1868, t. “ 1D. Staples, .. ... Bl -@ ¢| @ «1867, tc 1865 |Newell Austin, . 2 T| ace) @ oe] 1873. 2 “« \E. Arveson,. .... isan }S8 1865. “10. Burnett,... .. 11 1} . .| 1877, ¢. “ 1G.W. Case... . . 23 1 Blick ‘« N. Christopherson, . . 44. .] . .| 1869, t. “ JAS. Davis,» 2... - D4 eels ae as “ |F, W. Dighton, ‘ 6 4 . 1875, d. * John H. Johnson,.. .- 4 1869, t. “ |C. D. Pillsbury, aps 1 1865. “« |W.R. Sweat,..... 2) 3 al) i867. “ |W.S. Taylor,.. .. 12 5] &| 1882,. t «|W. J. Wilscn, . 4 .| . . | 1869, ¢. “ /H.J.Walker,.. .. 9 1874, t. “ |H. H. Gilliland,... . LUN ee ssc see BEG Ds 1866 |E. W. Allen, ..... 18 5 . | 1889, t. “« |Darius Bresee, a's 2 F 1868. « )W.M. Brown, . 5 . | 1871, t. « |/H. W. Bushnell, 23 3 Ale). a « |J. A. Gillespie, 6 1 1878, d. ‘« |Jas. Havens, "15 bs ae < “PW. R. Irish, a 21 2 4s gs « |Jas.T. Lewis,. ... 9 2) . .| 1877, ¢. “ JR. Pengilly,...-. . 23 él) oe ate oe ee «“ |J. Thos. Pryor, Jr., . - 2 1868, 2. NAMES OF PREACHERS. 507 a Bey 3 mea ei esas 2 Me . (38 YEAR, NAME, Pad YEAR, ies BS. 1866 |\J. D. Tull, ... .. 19} es . | 1885, t. « \L. E. Wanner, ... . QI i 1368. 11 « W.S. Wright, ; 15} . .| 4) 1881, d. . 1867 iC. A. Bucks, . . . 1 ‘ 1867, We Boughton, 5 1 1873, 6 “Carl T. Eltzboltz, 2 1869, t. “|W. E. Huntington, 3 1870, L. IP. Jansen, oe 5 x @ a & 2 1869, ¢. « |G. Liscomb, 2) 14 1883, d. ‘ |Thos. Manuel, 6 4 1877, d. : « IP. C. Page, . Sie J | % 1867. 211, “IL. B. Richardson, . . . 17 5 4)... “ \John Steele, ‘ 22 é Peet one “|W. M. Sedmore,.. . . a oaerg 1867. “ |H. M. Springer, 6 1 . | 1874, &. “ IM. D. Trewilleger, . 2 gh x8 1869, t. 1868 |Lester Allen, ] 1868. “1G. D. Browne, 21 : “« |J. T. Bryan, .. 21 “ «|W. E. Conway, . 10} 11 eres “EF. M. Cooley, ls os 1868. «|E. E. Clough, . 20 4; 1888, t. “1D. L. Hubbard, et 1879, /. “ |T. J. Lewis, . . 21 «IW. J. Terry, 3 ‘ 1871. “|W. C. Ross, go 8 16 5 ellie ing «J. H. Whitney,. .. . 9 1 . | 1882, 7. ‘© |Wm. Thomas, . 13 -| 1881, 0. 1869 |E. C. Arnold, . 2 1873. “J. Baldwin, 2 1871, l. “J. D. Brothers, .. . 19 So * Defies a “ \N. C. Bradley,.. .- .- 15 5 fy eli «|S. O. Brown, . 7 8 . | 1883, d. “7D. W. Couch,. . . . 9 3 3) 1881, ¢. “ |J. W. Chariton,. ... 12 ‘ . | 1881, wv. Dae “1M. F. Chester,.. . . . 2 3 a4) 1874, 16 “ 1H. K. Cobb, ... - 1 . «| 1869, d. “ |/D. C. Franklin,. . 2). 1871. “ 10, Irish, : ; 18, 1). .| 1888, 2 “ |Wm. Massee, . O38 15 5 ye «JA. J. Waite,.. . : ] : 1869. ‘“ \AH. McCurdy,. ... 2 : 1871. “ \H.8. Richardson,. . .« 6 als 1875, t. “IT, 8. Leavitt, -....- 41...) . .1 1878, 4. a o co APPENDICES TO PART JII. ees 25 |ves| eee o2a Ba |S23| 32 : o| YE bp 3 aig 7 : 28 YEAR. NAME. gS Bia : a6 YEAR, ee. e8/5 2): SS 46 Ss | Seti aa 16 | 1869 |Wm. Sturgis,. . . 10} +10 ee «10. C. Swartz, ..... 20 . 1870 |M. B. Balch, Be G 19 6 “J. W. Bell... 2... ll 1 1882, “J. J. Clifton, 9 1880 “|S. W. LaDue,. . . T]< si) ss) 1870, 4. “IW. J. McKay, . oe 19). Bh see ey ae as “ 1G. W. Nichols, . 2 ell 1872. “« \E. L. Semans, . 15 .| . . | 1884, é “J. Tresidder, . . 19 , AY sys as a “1B. E. Wheeler, i 19 ‘ Bs ave “ |C. Hendra, . Qe 4 1872, 1. 1871 |A. D. Dexter, . 13 5 1889, t. “ — |John Harris, r 18 5 ance “ |P. E. Knox,. oo & 12 6 ae IN. Léaéhy a. 6 ks ew 5 1 1877, “IR. W. Nichols, . : 17 1 a: ‘© |W. Semple,... . 6 5; . . | 1882, “iC. 8. Vail, . . F F 2 -| . «| 1873. “IE. S. West, « > MP or 1. » .{ 1871. 1872 |K. T. Briggs, . . ina V7]. Vallieseesks “« |@. W. L. Brown,.. . - 14 os af 1886, t. « jAlfred Charles, . . - 10}. 8] 1882, J. «|W. H. Chynoweth, . 13 2 é | ate we «|S. W. Horner,.. . 15 2 di tae Gaya “ (C. E. Hawkins, . . 3 ‘ 1875, t. « IW. H. McMillan, .. . DP sah Wi 8g ie! ye cee a «Js. E. McLain, . . 5 I 4 1878, 1. ‘© \Warren Mooney, . .- Ol Sse PL 1874. 1873 |H. C. Carter, .. . - Ali coon | ek | 1877 E «iJ. P.Greer,.... .- TG) aap Big «Geo. Haigh, . fa GB} ee - | 1879, w. “« |D.S8. Howes, ... . 3 1 1877, 1. « |Jas. Jefferson, . re 16 Bh sie ‘IM. Matthiason,. . . 9 .| . . | 1882, w. “ |G. T. Newcomb,... . 7) ae 1876. “ |/Robert Smith, . es 15 ‘ ise arte «IN. 8. Sliter, . acd 2 re eee 1875. « |J. H. Twombly, ... . 1 , 1874, t. “« 1A. F. Thompson... - 12 1) . .| 1886, “ l@. N. Kellogg,.. . = - Ly. oe js 1874. 1874 |W. J. Bullivant,... .- AY = 5535 . | 1878, 7. v ent Booth,.....- AB)! sé: bell ware elit are “ 10.4 . Britton, Eh ciate, Se 7 8 NAMES OF PREACHERS. 509 ag 5 a ngs es tel] Yr é Fe | 8s ros E : s& YEAR. NamME. 28 BS ; gs YEAR. BE £2 /8 03: 2S aa $8 | PSrli ae 1874 |W. T. Dudley, 4 5 1883, /. “|. J. Harrington, 6 1880, w. “ |Jas. McClane, . oe 3 1877, J. “ |T. H. Phillips,.. . . . 1 1875, ¢. “|\Edward Tench,. .. 9 1884, 1. “J. E. Webster,.. . . . 15 bl 1875 |R. Burnip, eo 8 13 .| . «| 1889, ¢. ‘“ \A.8. Collins, .. . . 13) . .| . . | 1888, t. «J. W. Duncan, de 2 el] ae af ROE “JH. Goodsell,.. . . =. Al ce Blge sary a os “|W. Galloway,... - 13 I) se og “ |E. D. Huntley, . . . 8) os 1} 1883, 4. « |J.G@ Haigh, ..: . ‘ 4 . | 1879, “ \H. M. Hackney,... . 6 1881, /. “|W. A. McLaughlin, . . 2 e $| 1827, 4 “ |C. R. Tuttle, . a8 1 | soa |) 1806; A, De Bally ioceoe ws vos Tals cc! eoaefie eek 1876 |M. Benson,.. . 13 A sa: Acco 4g «|W. K.Cook,.. . 1 . | 1877. «|W. P. Hathaway,. . 6 1882, 1. “ |John Haw, be 13 ill) Fresartal ER ES ae ts « |P. K. Jones, z 10 3}. . | 1889, d. “« |G. W. Smith, 13 Pale _— “ |J. 8S. Thompson,... . 7 alll 1883, ¢. “ \J. F. Zeigler, . .. WT seyret! Tao ae al ae “ |T. M. Evans, 3 ess 6 -| . «| 1882, ¢. “« /F. Howarth, , 10) . .] . .] 1886, 2. 1877 |C. Z. Crossett, . 4 .| . «| 1881, d. “ JG. N. Foster, . a 12 3 ee (ELLs Harte 2 ay ey 12 “|W. W. Hurd,... . 12) « « x oe @ “ |J. N. Phillips,.. . . 4 lj. .| 1881, w. “ 7W. OC. Sawyer,. . - 4, ..] ..] 1881, 4 I B. Nuzumy «3. 0 es V2) fh eS ar ata 1878 jCharles Barker, . 9 DNs aay osc Se “ jHenry Dockham, 8] . | 1886, d. “ |W. E. Doughty, . DU) a5. peach A ee ‘‘ |James Ford,. . 11 “* !Thos. Snodgrass, . . 1 ie ee “ George Tyake,..... 6) . «| . «| 1885, t. 1879 |E. J. Bickell, .. . - - 1 - «| 1879. “ |I. B. Bickford,... . TO) ace) erase eas 8 “ F.W.Hall,. . 3 7 ee fea sense “ WJ. D. Hurlbut, .. - Wk we | FS79 510 APPENDICES TO PART III. “yep ysay oy rod aatjoago Svea YEAR. NAME, =5y0p wayye aaTWQyo SIvOX qsry cayenuubiodng YKAR. 15 13 19 26 i i Wm.Shepherd,... . Jas. McManus, . Jas. Trewartha, L.N. Wooley, .. . I. N. Adrian, . . J. H. Avery, T. W. Cole, E. L. Eaton, ‘ W. A. Lawson,... . J.C.Lawson,. ... Thos. B.“Killiam,. . . J. T. Morgans, nal Se E. H. McKenzie, .. . Warren Woodruff. John Harrington,.. . J. I. Bartolomew, C. R. Kellerman, . E. Bradford, sig G. A. Joslin. . 1... J. J. Austin, . eo Benjamin Nott, . T. W. North,. . M. J. Robinson, . Edward Trimm, .. . 8. W. Trousdale, .. . James Barnett, . Arthur Chalfant, B. M. Fulmer, W. E. Robinson, John A. Willey, . ‘ John F. Cowling,. . . G. A. Fulcher, ... . John Claflin, ..... D. M. Sinclair, F. M. Haight, A.H. Yokom, ... . A.M. Pilcher,.... . F. J. Borgia, Wm. Atkinson, Thos. Foulkes, H. P. Blake,..... J. C. Gordon, L. W. McKibben, . . T. W.Stamp,. ... W. J. Ingersoll,.. . . eH : be DOP PRR BRR OTOTOTONLID WUTTRHWOARANNANNIWWDORWONWATOOH’ rOraARONOSO 1881. ‘1884, 1881. 1889, 1881. 1880, 1881, 1882, 1889, 1887, 1885, 1884, 1886, 1883, 1886, 1886. 1889, 1887, Ww. a) adc Ok NAMES OF PREACHERS. 511 “ ayup qsay 0) roTid DATPOYO SIVOK sive TOP BUIpPIsalg se YEAR. NAME, YEAR. “ay ep Isa 19qje dATpooya siv9 ‘ayenuuesodng do Arvsatana -radng paesojduma siva x "po oe _ eo . WeEOrRNRRON, Hb | Rayson,.... . “ )Wm. Rowe, . “18. W. Hayes,. . Benjamin Shipp, . . “ \F, C. Wright, . “IL, A. Willsey,.. . . “J. F. Tubbs, coe iadl 1887 |Wm. F. Emory, . . 8 5 “ IN. R. Hinds, “ 1H. J. Witherbee, “ |Thos. Leak, . « “iF. R. Lewis, ci “Alfred Ramey, ... . “|G. W. Pepper, “ \H. C. Meyers, . . “ |H. W. Troy, “« JF. W. Straw, . “10. H. P. Smith, 1888 |C. W. Bennett, “ \F. H. Harvey,. “\John N, Mills, : “ \E. F. Marcellus, .. . “ )W. M. Martin, : ““ |George Merrifield, . George Brown, George Derby, : “|G. R. Chambers, “ 1G. 8. Perry, . “ALB. Schoville, is “A. C. Halsey,. 2... “ )A.G. Harrison,. .. . 1889 |D. J. Whiting, ‘“« |Howard Robinson, “|W. H. Morgan, “IW. W. Hurlbut . Henry Stewart, “A. E. Smith, “ IL. B. Coleman, “|W. E. Pilcher, «|W. P. Burrows, . H. B. Brenaman,.. . 1887, «. 1889, d. 1886, 1. 1888, 1. 1889, d. RSH HDD NNNHENND! WwWwWlwwecweo 512 APPENDICES TO PART III. APPENDIX E. NAMES OF DISTRICTS AND PASTORAL CHARGES IN WISCONSIN. As they first appeared in the Appointments of the West Wisconsin, Northwest Wisconsin, or Minne- sota Conferences. WEST WISCONSIN AND NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFER- ENCES.* 1856. Mineral Point District, Point Bluff District, Albany, Bara- boo Mission, Cottage Inn, Darlington, Linden, Maus- ton, Moscow, Necedah, Oregon, Primrose, Norwegian Mission, Plainfield, Ridgeville, Viroqua, Norwegian Mission, Richland, Norwegian Mission, Little Falls, Marietta, Galesville, North Pepin, Kinnickinnick, Willow River. 1857. Washburn, Ellenbro, Providence, Boscobel, Liberty, Ar- gyle, Highland, Welsh Circuit, Brodhead, Cadiz, Ada- rio, Ironton, Kilbourn City, Burns, Cataract, Alma, Leon, Salem, Woodstock, Sextonville, Kickapoo, Lone Rock. 1858. Otter Creek Norwegian Mission, Paoli Dane, New Lisbon, Glendale, Richford, Strong’s Prairie, Jacksonville, Honey Creek, North La Crosse and Onalaska, Prairie du Chien, Southward, Viola, Springville, Mount Sterling, Prescott District, Pleasant Valley, Trimbelle, River Falls. 1859. Mazomanie, Vienna, Bristol, Quincy, Russell’s Corners, Angelo, Port Andrew, New Brookville, Portland, Tomah, Newton, Westfield, Trempealeau, Mondovia, Chippewa City, Menomonee, Rock Falls, Arcadia, Pepin, Eau Claire. 1860. Mineral Point Circuit, Mount Zion, Pleasant Prairie, Judah, Spring Green, Towerville and Albion, State *For changes in districts and charges in this territory prior to 1856, see Appendix E of the Wisconsin Conference. 1861. 1862. 1863. 1864. 1865. 1866. 1867. 1868. 1869. 1870. 1871. 1872. 1873. 1874. 1875. 1876. 1877. 1878. 1879. 1880, DISTRICTS AND PASTORAL CHARGES. 513 Line, Viroqua Circuit, De Soto, Melrose, Leroy, Well- ington, Hixton, Galesville District, Garden Valley, Augusta, Neillsville, Eau Claire East, Eau Claire West, Maxville, Durand, Eau Galla. Avoca, Loyd, Chippewa District, Cedar Valley, Rich- mond, Centerville. Batavia, Sylvan, Wonewoc, Gratiot, Bear Creek, Fair Valley, Downsville, Hudson (Second Charge), New Richmond, Diamond Bluff. Wilsonville. (Racine and Milwaukee, Hart Prairie, Cambridge and Coon Prairie) Norwegian Missions ; Hancock, Wauzeka, Rush River, New Richmond District, Hillsborough, Luna, Bloomer Prairie. Middleton, West Branch, Whitehall, Cook’s Valley. Kilbourn District, Big Spring, Clear Creek, Vanville, Hammond, Rock Elm. (Merrimac, Sheboygan, Manitowoc, and Asheppen) Nor- wegian Missions; Lincoln, Ontario, Wauneka, Bayfield, Oneota. (Chicago, Primrose, Highland, and Richland) Norwegian Missions; Monroe Circuit, Seneca and Brookvile, Mount Hope, Pigeon Creek. Belmont, Bluff, Friendship, Blue River, Black River Circuit, Tomah Circuit, Tunnel City, Wilton, Bloomer, Peru, Louisville, Apple River, West Salem. Belle Center, Knight’s Creek, St. Croix. Mauston Circuit, Osseo, Loyal, Hay River, Springfield. St. Croix District, Ellsworth, Esdale, Alabama. Blooms Station, Elroy, Cedar Falls, Modena, Chippewa Circuit, Greenwood and Colby. Merrillan and Humbird, Clifton and Kinnickinnick, Lucas, Georgetown. Barron, Edson, Union Valley, North Freedom, Sparta Circuit, Breerton. West Point, Clear Lake, Knapp, Humbird and Fairchild, Liberty Pole, Maiden Rock. Bloomington, Boscobel Circuit, Kendall, Mormon Cooley and Chaseburg, Pleasant Grove, Wheaton. Benton, Eau Claire City Mission, Eau Claire Circuit, Prairie Farm, Sumner. La Grange, Cadott Falls, Unity, Arkansaw. Excelsior, Spencer, ele Medford. 514 APPENDICES TO PART III. 1881. Sechlerville, Marshfield, Rice Lake. 1882. Hamlin, Thorp and Longwood, Prairie Farm, Cumber- land, Woodville, Black Hills and Central City Missions, Dakota. 1883. Mill Creek, Ashland, Phillips. 1884, Beef Slough, Shell Lake, Newton, Mount Horeb, Verona, Rewey, Chaseburg and Newton, Coloma. 1885. Baraboo, South Side, Homer, Syene. 1886. Boaz. 1887. Ashland District, Chetek, Balsam Jake, Turtle Lake, West Superior, Washburn, Bloom City, Bloomingdale, La Crosse (Caledonia Chapel), La Crosse (Coleman Chapel), Brooklyn, Fairchild. 1888. Abbotsford, Chelsea, Prentice, Glidden, Hurley. 1889. Drummond, Loraine, Marshfield, Cassville, Lancaster Circuit, Sandusky and Lime Ridge, Union Center, Glennwood. Sa ee APPENDIX F. AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE METHODIST EPISCO- PAL CHURCH. The People of the State of Wisconsin, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows: Section 1. That all Trustees who have been, or may here- after be, chosen or appointed inany society of the Methodist Episcopal Church in this State, according to the rules and Dis- cipline of said Church, and their successors in office, appointed as aforesaid, shall be a person in law, capable of contracting and being contracted with, suing and being sued, and defend- ing and being defended, in all suits and actions whatsoever, both in law and in equity, and shall have power to acquire, hold, possess, and enjoy in trust for the Methodist Episcopal Church, any lands, tenements, and hereditaments, and to use or to sell and convey the same, for the proper benefit of said Church. Src. 2. Whenever a vacancy shall occur in any such Board of Trustees, by death, resignation, removal from the society, or otherwise, such vacancy shall be filled according to the rules and Discipline of said Church. Sec. 3. All lands, tenements, and hereditaments that now SPECIAL SERMONS. 515 are, or may hereafter be, held by any trustee or trustees, in trust for the Methodist Episcopal Church in this State, for the purposes of religious worship, a residence for their pastor or pastors, a burying ground, or educational purposes, shall, with the improvements and appurtenances, descend to and be held, by such trustee or trustees as may from time to time be chosen or appointed according to the rules and Discipline of said Church. Sec. 4. The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to Incorporate the Meth- odist Episcopal Church,” approved March 15, 1849, is hereby repealed. Sec. 5. This Act shall take effect and be in force from and after the first day of April next, and may be amended or re- pealed by any future Act of the Legislature. Approved March 5, 1868. APPENDIX G. SPECIAL SERMONS BEFORE THE CONFERENCE. WEST WISCONSIN AND NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CON- FERENCES. YEAR. (NaME. SUBJECT OF SERMON. PLACE. 1857|W. Wilcox, . \Missionary, . . . {Mineral Point. 1858 R. Z. Mason, : ee : . |La Crosse. #1859) W. B. Hecleeing 2 ‘ h - |Monroe. 71859|J. C. Aspm wall, a Platteville. 1860)C. E. Weirich, fs . |Baraboo. 1861)M. Bennett, ee . . |Madison. 1861|W. McKinley, ee - |Galesville. 1862/A. Brunson,. . . sf . . |Dodgeville. 1862|W. Haw, ee . |Hudson. 1863|James Lawson, fe . . |Lodi. 1863/H. T. Magill, . |West Eau Claire. 1864/P. 8S. Mather, se . |Mauston. 1864/0. N. Whitney . “s . . |Black River Falls. 1865|A. Brunson , es . |Brodhead. 1865) W. H. Brocksome, ee . . . .|Menomonee. 1865}A. Brunson, . (Semi-Centennial, . |Brodhead. 1866|J. Gurley . . . |Missionary, . |Prescott. * Spring Conference. + Fall Conference. 516 APPENDICES TO PART III. YEAR. Name. SUBJECT OF SERMON. PLACE. 1866|W. F. Delap, .. .|Missionary,.. . . |Hazel Green. 1866/T. C. Golden, .. ./Centenary, . . . . |Prescott. 1866/P.8. Mather, .. ./Church Extension,|/Hazel Green. 1866]A. Brunson, . . . |Centenary, Hazel Green. 1867|James Evans, . .|Missionary, .. . . /Prairie du Chien. 1867/S. Aldrich,... . a .. . . |Sparta. 1867|James Lawson, ..|Church Extension,/Prairie du Chien. 1868/E. Yocum,. . ./|Missionary,.. . . |Mazomanie. 1868/E. B. Ruesell, . ./Church Extension, Mazomanie. 1869|I. B. Richardson, |Missionary, .. . . |Portage City. 1870/C. Bushby, ee La Crosse. 1871 1872 1873 1873 1874 1875 1875 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888] E 1889 1890 A. Brunson, J. L. Williams, T. C. Golden. W.E. He sineeon: H. Gilliland, W. 4H. Palmer, ‘ J. B. Bachman, C. Cook, . . H. D. Jencks, E. E. Clough, J. E. Irish, . J. Knibbs, . J. Evans, . . I. B. Richardson, C. Irish, E. L. Semans, a H. Goodsell,. . . C. R. Kellerman . E. L. Eaton,.. . 8S. W. Horner, . . James Lawson, . . W. 4H. Chynoweth, H. P. Blake,. . . J.M. Thoburn, .. E. Trimm,. .« Arthur Edwards, z W. M. Martin, “i +. APPENDIX H. . [Mineral Point. . |Educational, West Eau Claire. . Missionary, . - |Baraboo. . |Educational, . |Baraboo. . |Missionary, . Brodhead. . |Temperance, . Hudson. .|Missionary, .. . . |Hudson. . |Centennial, .. . . |Hudson. - |Missionary, . . Madison. fe . |Eau Claire. ee Monroe. . |La Crosse. ne Platteville. fe . . |Sparta. as . |Portage. ce Baraboo. ut .. + ./Eau Claire. Centennial of 3 M. E. Church, Eau Claire. Missionary, . . |Dodgeville. Black River Falls. Mineral Point, Mauston. Sparta. . |Monroe. DELEGATES TO GENERAL CONFERENCE. WEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. Wilcox, E. Yocum. 1860. Reserves—W. DELEGATES TO GENERAL CONFERENCES. 517 1864. Matthew Bennett, Jas. Lawson. Reserves—A. H. Walters, J.C. Aspinwall. 1868. A. Brunson, R. Dudgeon. Reserves—P. 8. Mather, E. Yocum. 1872. Ciericat—J. B. Bachman, J. B. Reynolds, A. Brunson, T. M. Fullerton. Reserves—R. Dudgeon, P. 8. Mather. Lay—John H. Rountree, John E. Stillman. Reserves—Thos. D. Steele, Daniel T, Abell. 1876. CLERICAL—Wm. Hamilton, Wm. Haw, P.S. Mather. Re- serves—J. E. Irish, R. Dudgeon. Lay—M. Herrick, D. W. Ball. Reserves—E. E. Bentley, E. C. French. 1880. CiertcAL—Wm. Hamilton, Wm. Haw, Jas. Lawson. Re- serves—E. D. Huntley, J. E. Irish. Lay—D. J. Spaulding, Wm. Curry. Reserve—E. C. French, 1884. CriericAL—W. J. McKay, M. Benson, J. E. Irish. Reserves— G. W. Case, H. Goodsell. Lay—Henry Harnden, Ira Bradford. Reserves—E. E. Bentley, F, L. Sanborn. 1888. CuirricaL—E. L. Eaton, B. E. Wheeler, W. J. McKay. Re- serves—John Tresidder, M. B. Balch. Lay—E. E. Bentley, J. B. Jones. Reserves—P. J. Layne, Jas. Spensley. NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CONFERENCE. 1864. Chauncey Hobart, T. C. Golden. Reservese—Wm. Hamilton, W. M. Osborne. 1868. T. M. Fullerton. Reserve—C. P. Hackney. ATION pe edug pe,tadng parading oa lays DATIOOH padadugy¢ pa tadny pe adng po,cadng pa radng pa radng pa,tadng 9A tN pa,tadng Os OaAB eT Araadng pa,aodng aAlpapy IATA Au zadng 7SBT‘S “TSS ‘OT “1881 ‘GZ “OSS1 ‘OT "ISSI‘¢ “OSS ‘EL 0881 * LEST f Igst ‘og Tidy “SNY [SLM ‘UaTYO Up og oa. “ITT faneAuyey ‘sny STA ‘aT Taek pog 20d ve ‘Ssny oat 5 UR I Y 8 ad SEAQ ‘punan¢y suy “SIAL ‘Aanqspaey STM OTTTAONBNIT ergr ‘9 Au | St MQ Gano OLST ‘FURE] SE ‘TAOpUOTT “GOST ‘CT “AON STAY ‘OITEA@T 9 “69ST ‘GZ "AON “STAY ‘Wostpeyt "SORT 'L Buy pt (SEM “eMoy “SOST ‘ZT ABN “Waa.Ly [eZNET “LOST ‘OL AUN AVMION "9981 ‘82a TA ‘Toqoosog 99ST “ez “ydos OZ8T SE8T GS8T “Oro “BInqst4td “ae “resi Test} aatysdanyy “Nt TS8T]" UTSUOOST AL LL8T)“UTSUOOS! AA * AY OORT|UTSUOOSTAA AA N CRI] raaTYy YOY LOST] “UISUODST AA * AY LOBT FosTy” GEST|“WISNOOST AA “AL Bate “M GS8T}""""** UISTOOS! AA LISI} Sug "WW “Mtg LORT/“UTSMOOST MA MA “UISUODST AL “"S6LT “6 "G2" ‘808T ‘eT dy seat ——— “OTST “ZI I0 oO an n a s6O agof ae D a LOST “6T “AUK LIST “€G “dag “SFB ‘——— ST ‘bz “ydag w So ao = aa g S N an & i = 2h =. 4 “EZ8T ‘OT “ydag 6Ist (9 Au LOST ‘2 AU “OTST ‘or “PO: “LOLI, “CEBT ‘Ge “99 ‘OTST ‘2¢ Ainge} “ezgt *Z sny ““qnoTqoauT0g * eras | A8uUd,| “UpBUBD “puvryyoos “puryyoog YIOX AMIN AUOULIO A, ‘JUOULIA A “purysugq + eee BAN TORT -puepsug teres ey unig pedjTv “OYysuy Yooug JOSso.u) “"Z 297.109 &yysuog prea py “THO UYOr TANUL]T sumoyy mo T a “M stourdyy Lava “HUA ‘ardsalpig “y samusr MgqoD JLeq oy TIUH sususny “q900 “9 Arua *§ pu) SOTARE “'saPISIOUUUNG "NMA ufo “pag Udjopy “eSpoq panturg vo TosMagd 1a}aq Lg sneiqdag isnyo, uostepuy jendiug 1 jPALPopa POST ‘Te “ANY “SEMA “v00AW STOOSTAA "AA| "GIST ‘2 UBL OX MAN] “1esuAs L jaatpayay "FORT ‘8g ABN nna, ‘OUTTA USE NT loosTM “ML | LEST SL “ue” STOUT] | radu rtd Pryor. PpElaatoogay POST ‘Ez “Sn “STAA ‘ooqerg [OSs] arttysduey ‘N]L08T ‘6t ad y vartysdwuey MON] “XOOTLAL UOPRULTSE A ZZ/PATOOBA “COST CT Qa] “Sst ‘Banger [Ossi] Sanqsyytg {Ost ‘242 Lady “‘BuIBAT ASU 8 joa toayay OOST ‘OT “avy “STM SOSOLMUULIG [GEST] UISUOOST A] “FUSE ‘g AVL AVANIO NT § joarjoaya |r “EGS ‘9190 “STM ‘9, SB1V |9CST]“ATSMOOST AA“ AA] "SES T ‘——— *puvpug [qs arg uo SIS (S(EIE] of i |i 5 siSyEiels| 8s y “TOT “ato M 2 “qeUM “ueT 310M Mrsy2i2i3) fed |: = ‘ s\SlH} fez]: ig "SAV als |élé la #28 |e N = bo -aasva “TONTNATNOS, . “sava yl 5 a] PENA aaNnio¢ AUOg "6881-9681 ‘JONIYIINOD NISNOISIM LSIM—SHILSINIW 40 ADOTONDIN ‘I XIGNHdady s¥onquay oan WL 10K NAN “eprueg FIOX MIN “purlaugy sy TOULA A | OUTIA[ZVH “EMAL S}JOSNYOussv] | UOSMWOUT, pp AL YIOX MON plnex) Tosuuyy ~ FUOULIA A, EMUTIGSY “Of so prepay] “SapTULgoyy prea pg, stanyyooq £109F] “AOUS| SIFT SouU TSN fot “MOBUTQOY “OT [RTO AL “sqquy Tyr aUAOIG “O 91198 IOLA YL SemUve JOAN YOY)! “LIST ‘TF oan] WISTOOSIM MPT ISST St ABW 12|pe,tedug O1}At,rodng & j9Ayoonar FZ | pa tadng SEPA Hoon el ge|4r,20dng 9 |pa,1adng Z1|pe,azedng “osst ‘og uw] fadTBIQ NB |9L81 “ERB ‘OT ‘uuey SEM UUPNE[OSRE UTSMOOS! AA AL] OPST ‘LZ “99 “SRxBI ‘08 JOO] STM ‘ALSUBAAY TCST “UISHOOST AA “CISTI ‘bs AL “BsI ‘ST 90" “SEAN ‘POTUOTY [9GRT|“UPSMODST AL AL] "LEST (ZZ “GOT STA ATURULOZETY [OFST oe LOLTL OIL ‘ Avy seers TTT CoswON [OSS T | "-MESMOOS! AK] LIBT “L "0 “LEST ‘GL “IVIN | MOT SUOIIO A FN Pst a 9p|po,zedng “LOBT 'L *ydagy “STM ‘TDOTITEST 02) pa sadng 9ssr ‘et Su PUSEA “B04 V 1F981]" Ze|aa1yoang [09] 9881 “FS [AAV * STAN '190080-1 /5F S81" 8 }pe,zedng “ORRL (1G “MUL /BAOT OY O1G1UTy /9g81 logos Taya GQBT “Es AVI] SEA ‘AI[TATA[YOOS|6E81]" [ Jaat aya Ess ‘g ood] Sim ‘uIdag oxVT)/E881 12|pe,tedng FEST ‘LE "qe" L |Ar,todng “EB8E TZ 20 SIM ‘OoqRAvg|698 1" $3] pe redng egst ‘IT ‘ydeg] "stm ‘eT11408poq |zeg 1] “9Z8T OT NW “egg ‘gz Wady REST SST “OUT “LEST ‘0g “ydag STUD OP A lq |LGS I} -UTsOOSt AA “MA "6ZSL ‘GS “AVA © ISUOOSTAL “M puslsugy “IZ8T ‘e2 “Wdeg|orrysdueyy AvoN ““PISt ‘b-qdas “punypsug “|poaedng SBSI ‘8s “AVL 'STM ‘PUOLU OR “NIZEST]" quoras9A|“908T ‘94 “Ideg qUOWTa A quuoasiry snadp TREE] .2 2: J alElsizls| Sei ]i] -woum ‘or M 2] wm ‘U8 ‘aI. {S{SEl2| £24 1: = : H|S|sts Pau |e SHAY N Rf [a [2 | 222 ei = y ‘CASV AON “HON NOD “NWO! “Suva, 3 a eyHong., aaNnio¢ a "6881-9681 ‘JINIYIINOD NISNODSIM LSIM—SHILSINIW 40 ADOTOYNIIN 520 APPENDIX J. Hecrvology. APPENDICES TO PART IU, Deceased Wives of Ministers in West Wisconsin and Northwest Wisconsin Conferences, 1856-1889. Born. = 3 DECEASED. Name. = 4 3 z z g g |e" & g ° ae is ° : Elizabeth Lawson,. . |England,. . .;Wiota,.. . — . |1859 Elizabeth L. Mather, |England,. 14|Hazel Green, . . |1863 Mrs. J.C. Aspinwall,|.....-. . .|. .|Platteville,. . . |1864 Emma Brunson,. . . |Connecticut,|1791} 26|Prairie du Chien,|1846 Ellen McGinley,...|.....-. a4 9|Hazel Green, . . |1873 Jane C. Yocum,...-/| ..... 1807; 37|Point Bluff, . . |1873 Lucy E. Irish, Canada, . {1834 14)/Hudson,.. . . 1873 Mary Cook,.... . Michigan, . |1835} 23/Dodgeville,.. . |1879 Lucetta McGinley, . . |New York, .|. . 6|Orion, .. . . {1879 Caroline S. Brunson, . |Connecticut,|1815) 12/Prairie du Chien,]1860 Elizabeth Booth, . |New York, .|1852} 9/Prairie du Chien,|1881 Martha M. Irish, . . |Lllinois, . . 1840} 15)Hammond,.. . /1881 Mary A. Lawson,. .- Connecticut,|1842} 20|State Line,. . . |1883 Caroline Wilcox, Vermont, . |1805) 30)Baraboo,.. . . /1883 Annie L. Haw, . . -|Vermont, .|1854) 8/New Richmond, |1883 Margaret Yocum, . -/-- -- ++]: 8\Sparta,.. . . . {1883 Alice Nichols, . . . » |Wisconsin,./1851) 12/North Freedom, |1884 Maggie F. Thompson, /Guernsey, - 1853) _8|Madison, Dak.,. |1885 Amelia B. Knibbs, .|.- +--+ > -.| 26lowa,..... 1887 Mary Pryor, ..- - England,. . |1813) 32)Dodgeville,. . |L888 Julia M. Haw, . [New York, . |1834| 30)/Minneapolis, . . {1889 521 -CONFERENCE SESSIONS. “Ie ]2 J9 |9 Jo Ie g | Jorpeued ‘s ‘8 7 s+ ‘gaury[* + + peayporg|‘6 “jdeg—F/st “IT |e |b IF [8 |e F [oIpeued "gs 'S sont FELT + ‘ooqvavg |‘2T ‘3deg—ezst “IZ lot |g is |6 IE |e}: [sorpeueg “sg ‘8 “+ ‘saaavy]| * °° “orrelg neq|‘gl “Ideg—zsssT “It lp |2 |e |e foc|n Jr ffsesandg ‘aq ‘I * + ‘uosdurtg) * “Jurog etoary]| * “¢ “yOO—TL8T Z|t |t lo |s |s |e 6 ‘op fficoduudg “qT soot Spreo ‘assorQ eT] * ‘g “O—OL8T “WB oe 2 16 Fe PT ‘eye |'SUUBITTIM TL ** ‘43009 ‘asey10g|‘0g “ydeg—6g8s1 “Tee oTig |g 16 aL ‘apurgoeg “q ‘“f ‘souy ‘oraBmozeyy|‘FZ “ydeg—sost LIL clP le fe |e |e ‘resatidg “q "] * ‘aosduig|‘aergy uperrerg|‘¢ “ydeg—L98T i |e |g |g |9 ‘uvuyoeg “g “f * Qqjoog] + ‘Weedy) [ozBH|'6s “SNY—9I98T “IL |Z |e j9 {9 ‘uemyoeg “qd ‘f ** ‘mosmoyL ‘peoqporg |‘Tg ‘Bn y¥—cosl 9 0T |E |e |e ‘smerIM "Tf + ‘Kopssuryy ‘aoqsne ‘gz “3des—Fr98t “Ie je jg |e |Z ‘uvuyoeg “g “f ‘uosdurig * TpoT|'s ‘ydeg—egst “late |g |9 {9 ‘sumaRITIM. “TL ‘soues - « @qpaadipog | F “ydag—zost “ie telle |e i@ |@ ie TOsmmOUL HM ‘rayeg "+ “GosIpey|‘TL “ydeg— 9s sicyclr ie ig le {se ~ |aosmmou HM ++ 49008 + fooqvaeg |'ZT “3deag—ogs Zio} 18 |6 Ig Ig lz 1g SUIBITITM “Tf ‘souup] > °° ‘aq]TAeyqe[d! * '¢ “OO—6E8T ePebele jg de lot fA frocfeccfe [SUmerqEa Trp ‘eyVg ‘so1u0y|‘9 [ady—6est Lyv}cyr i616 let st cols MSUIBITTAA Tf) tt t+ SEIOTAL ‘e881 PT ‘63. [AV —8o81 sicpcjs i le is Jat ir L/‘SarenqtAa “I fp st * ‘somry| * ‘JUlog [BOUL |S “SN Y—LEST he ts “IT 16 16 | |e @ |SMBITIM "I “f£ ‘uosdmig] * * * * ‘uosIpey|‘0Z “Su y—ggsT Hel ifel i! i} gle ile delgels HEls|é| Glealealy ile ileS[sZlE| -asvauoay “a0usig ‘sOVId ‘aNIL 2) Ee] 3] S|2S 2 SlEslESlE SEC |B S(S(Slz/Als |S |e ia ia jase ‘SAONADAAINOD NISNOOSIM ISAMHLHON UNV NISNOOSIA LSHAL ‘SNOISSHS HONHUYAANOD ‘SM XIGNHddYy 44 APPENDICES TO PART III. 522 ele I 6 ie |e fen Mesandg “gq T|* + + + + ‘wosduig|* + + * ‘eaedg|‘gr ydag—zogt 6 3 6 |e |9 fe ‘WOMNT WLp* 7 +t GOag] «+ ++ Gq008erg|'ZL “Ideg—gogT Ng I € IL i@ fre ‘uOMaT[NT WL] * 7 * Suoswuoyy} - * ‘sauomoueyy|‘pl 3deg—eggt lg é seep Wg [eet “CoWaTOT WL) serq Mo yrMVyy * Aq |e LOATy Wouyq] "1g “dogs—t9st lp T lz P g - awies ‘uo}aT NY Wool * eae ‘souly = ae “aaTelO nes] * 4 ‘49O—L98T ie I sanloee Zi S 9 LZ z sence ‘u0W9] [Ny W or mo aes ae . ‘soues a ee ‘aospuyy “6g *ydag—zgogt “HELPP |S 16 1G MOWAT ML) ¢ + 1 + eyed): + ‘orptaseye4y|‘9z “3deg—togr sig ferrfeee[oerl@ fr P 6 seoee[ereee HT “MOTTA “M Safe St ee tic te ag ‘43009 ay hehe “eyaedg ‘g “ydeag—oggt “SONG GANOD NISNOOSTA LSA MHLUWON g joy “IG je jr io UL ‘PPtpedeg "S “Spot 7 + fueulaeN ys + + “eqaedgy'gt ydeg—essT gt 2 {or |s jz |9 “|yorpeueg “S "sj" * * ‘SMaapuy] - - * ‘uoysneTy] * ‘g “9QO—8ggT Sle yrpopels jor ja js i ‘Je | WIpemeg “g “S}° + + + ++ Ma[MOg] + Gu10g TeLeulyy | "gz “dag—zgst Gls |T |e IL ie 6 fo JB jo IL fn |eleouM “A ‘aps + tt tt ‘Tay |si1eq teary yoRLg|‘0g “ideg—gggT I Zz are l aa) Ll Gg e 9 S seeee [es (19 [92q AA “OL ‘g ee Oe oe ce ‘uemMog eb ‘aT[LAaspoq ‘bg ydag—ege Sopp {Lo |e je |e fo |S JC | ePOUM “A “ats + + + Merperrey] =~ * Sourelg neq|‘ez deg—teet Before spew ia te ee OOM “HE a] tt san + + ‘ooqereg|‘9g ydag—egeT j It Gio io JG |@ |r IL jay ePeua “A ‘a}* + + ++ ‘sMorpuy] - + + ‘edByt0g]‘eT “1deag—ggegt $ |F Sir Jo IS IL |e JL fl]sermeumM “a ca}: + ++ tt BBOq]* + + + + fequedgs}'tT ydeg—teet j IZ 616 io |g Jz Jo JL IL] Heou a “ays + + + + + ‘sraeRy] + ++ ‘orpraenerg|‘zg “idag—ogst oe z 9 L 9 1 I . oe UOPI[ [NY “TAL A oe 8 we ew ‘yoog a> ‘assolp eT $G yda9—6/8T lbp pets 2 19 |b ft ir LE fe ffmoqtayog WE] s**t faaqsog] «+ + ‘eoru0yy|‘ez “ydag—eg/gT T P eee L c G 6 ib 9 I soeee lee ‘moqtal [Dy TAL a ee he oh ‘sMoIpuy + QITRIC neq ~ ‘e ‘YO—LLET “IEP hele |p jo 19 Ja | |e |e |faemmoeg “g ‘p}: + - * + Saetmog] > + ++ ‘uosipeye|‘et ‘ydeg—ozetT Sle pcpocpe |e fe ie jou je JL jLpverpeueq “gs csyo + s+ Koptayf: ++ ‘aospny] - ‘9 yQ—e28T VS ifey iH gle ye eeleslz |] 5/2 5 wleelesle : ae ge ge = “AUVLANOAG * dOuSIg. ‘HOVI ‘AWE 2) 3] S| 3] SER |e Sea lesle aje° 2 =| El &s| SealSalseSalSe/S ils Als|alelals |S [2 je l2sle ‘GHNNILNOO—SNOISSHS FJINAAFANOD i Pe “Cy | ERRATA. Sy On page 24 for Menosha read Menasha. On page 89 for Appendix A read Appendix D. On page 434 for S. P. Blake read H. P. Blake. In the illustration following page 340 for ‘I’. M. Ful- -leron read T. M. Fullerton. . On page 352 the reference to J. D. Searls is not to be understood that he was vut.of our ministry or church at any time since he joined the-conference in 1858. On page 475 and 476 opposite the. names W. JJ. Thompson and R. Mapes read r instead of e. On page 474 under date 1840 add H, R. Colman, and under date 1858 on page 477 add Henry Colman and L- L. Knox. On page 487 under. Chaplaincies in the Army add W. P. Stowe and W. D. Ames, On middle of page 485 read L. L. Knox for E. L. Konox, :