ee es ise ie tZ ae os ee LE ee .#. ig 7s ys a “ Lip ie ee LA Ze ee a ie 3 ws IS, - a sta an =e re, ie eh i i aa ‘h if waa} ee i a Ph Ou i isnt ‘ art ¥ ‘a i i i aa ts Sait wai ity a oO a ! : ne ; ait ath ay 3 CO ~ a iy a - | i ae Sa — Hs ~~ Sa . os . ey ie 4 ne} ‘ ny tk atk ei $60 i is Ray * iy eM ek ik ii icf : ai a i ¥ es i it ster a Sa i pt ae ce A a ee - ‘ N tet iat if ay aise s iy a ae ‘ Ay iy) 38 ‘4 ae ot A iN i ait RNS a a its ated . — i State w “y hy ae . et aH cs wie Bs oF - aan es es ~ ' “ ‘ _ . - : - 4 Ns y Raa ie iy 5 eu da east s i < Pie ie tls Sa aw Sa Ras i} 3 an aie foe i a x a fg iN x ae \ ie) 34 as is ne 4 iss Hah 1s ek Be ‘ : Ris RAaNe a wa Seat be . 4 a add as a is i att i 4} ng ee i i i N aay N ie x} is ‘3 _ ee 4S 7 BS Pe ARK ay i Nk ul i} a ai ets ifs ee Bee ) i ee a — RN i Ra - sis hae a se es 1c, a = is is adh 5 eas Ban as aa Ss — sit ‘ oe , me ‘ aes it Sa , By y ee . ie ite i oa * fees Ki w Me “ as Sas — ai ay Re rene i . ise eo y A Ra ua aut a Bas Ns ie . % cs x Kine MS a SG a oN a 32) ey Wid a4 i oe isa a ie is as : iss a aa ah y ( aes a 3 sp ae ae K Saati Rs Sat sas iq i ae His} oe Be a BY \ a < as a SUR sd Ky " ay ae Re iy Ness as , i : a Ss 8 ae RY i Ra ai sts aaa - he mh 5 i Mi i Si) ay 4x6 Sa is os RN ey a. is Ps i sak i a KY i ‘ Ses sit aN - . So i ey i) co . ie iS nS cs Ra is ae ai a 3 . “ . sa - a — ce _ AN ’ k : i BS a a RNS a me . a * st oe Ny a saat i$ ais “ i ‘ i iSite cai Ak . oi i - 7 7 aie aN a x iS a (i aH RS i} aN a aes ai 5 ¥ Has if ENT aS ei ay oe ; “ - a : eae ~ me : o ‘ a iN N — ‘ Rs KS a ms Ba ‘ _ a ae aS . a ye i aa iets iat is i: as ade cs : ae aS cee a 4 ‘3 na % ake KS ae q Hi 4 Hone is 4 i ‘ i sae ‘ ie 2 a us Si és - i ut ‘i ‘ ue hh > a Ra aa a NS be tS 7 sh - > ah eh - sR « oe . Me Ase a Kid Migs Here a a ee sei i F a ai on os es CG ai a ss ss re hey se ei h ue oy ence th any ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY New YorK STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY EVERETT FRANKLIN PHILLIPS BEEKEEPING LIBRARY c mM bs | a e i ve : ir mM mie i | ne C ee THE ILLUSTRATED AUSTRALASIAN Bee MANUAL AND COMPLETE GUIDE TO MODERN BEE CULTURE IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE. . By ISAAC HOPKINS, MatamMatTa, AUCKLAND, N.Z. \* WITH WHICH IS INCORPORATED THE “NEW ZEALAND BEE MANUAL” GREATLY ENLARGED, REVISED, AND MOSTLY RE-WRITTEN BY THE AUTHOR, ASSISTED BY T. J. MULVANY, Bay View Apiary, Katixati. THIRD EDITION—FOURTH THOUSAND. 143 ILLUSTRATIONS. Published by the Author. H. H. HAYR & Co., Agents, High Street, Auckland, N.Z. MDCCCLXEXVI, : ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PREFACE. TuE first edition of ‘‘The New Zealand Bee Manual,” published in September, 1881, was a small book of some 150 pages, and was intended to convey, in a popular form, such information with regard to the modern system of bee-culture as might tend to awaken an interest in that pursuit among the settlers in these colonies, enable those who should desire to make a beginning to do so in the proper manner, and iuduce others, who were already working in the dark with candle-boxes and gin-cases, to discard such appliances and adopt a more rational method of bee-keeping. The best proof that the subject was beginning to attract attention will be found in the fact that the first edition was disposed of in thirteen months, and a second thousand had to be issued in October, 1882. That edition being also exhausted and a new one required, I felt bound to consider the greatly altered circumstances under which it would have to be pub- lished, and to endeavour to make it, as far as possible, suitable to those new conditions and to the advances made in the art of bee- culture up to the present day. In the interval since the issue of the first edition, bee-culture has taken an established footing in New Zealand and the Australian colo- nies, the suitability of the climate and the flora being no longer a matter of speculation but one of experience. My duties as Editor of ‘““The New Zealand and Australian Bee Journal ” during the two years of its circulation, brought me into very agreeable communication with bee-keepers in all parts of these colonies, and the consequent inter- change of views and experiences has enabled me to obtain an amount of information with regard to the condition and prospects of the industry in this part of the world which was previously entirely want- ing. I came to the conclusion that there is a rapidly increasing class of people who are turning their attention to apiculture in Australasia, and who, whether as professed apiarists or as amateurs, would require a manual of bee-culture which, while giving in a general but not : vi. PREFACE. merely superficial way an epitome of our present knowledge upon all apicultural matters, scientific and theoretical, should also enter into full details upon all the practical points necessary for the guidance of a beginner in the art, and which should be specially prepared with reference to the seasons of the southern hemisphere, and to the flora and other local peculiarities of the Australasian colonies. A revision and enlargement of the original manual to meet these views has led to the re-casting and re-writing of all the chapters, and the intro- duction of so much new matter and additional illustrations as to constitute it in point of fact an entirely new work. In carrying out this programme I have availed myself of the able co-operation of Mr. T. J. Mutvany, of Bay View Apiary, Katikati, to whom I tender my sincere thanks for his valuable aid, without which, with the limited time at my disposal, I could not have under- taken the task. The share taken by Mr. Munvany in the new matter to be found in many of the following chapters will be recognised by the readers of “The New Zealand and Australian Bee Journal,” to the columns of which he so ably contributed, during the two years of its existence ; condensed extracts from several of his papers are here ‘given in places where their introduction seemed to work in with the present plan. T have also to acknowledge my indebtedness and tender my thanks to Mr. C. Futiwoov, of Brisbane, Queensland ; Mr. Tros. E. Winxis, of Sydney, N.S.W.; Mr. Davip Grass, of Ballarat, Victoria; Mr. A. E. Bonney, of Adelaide, South Australia ; and Mr. Tuos, Luoyp Hoop, of Hobart, Tasmania, who so willingly and ably acceded to my request to furnish me with facts connected with apiculture in their respective colonies, and so aided me in giving much local information valuable to beginners in all parts of Australasia, and which must also prove interesting to apiarists working under very different circum- stances in other parts of the world. In endeavouring to ‘place before the novice (whose necessities have been kept constantly in view in the preparation of this work) a clear picture of the rise, progress, and present condition of the art of bce- culture, I have made free ase of all the standard works already pub- PREPACE, vii. lished in England, America, and Germany, as well as the bee journals and technical periodicals of the same countries, extracting from each what appeared to me to be the most essential to be impressed upon the mind of the reader. In every case I have been careful not only to specify the sources from which such extracts have been taken, but also to give the quotations accurately in the words of the respective authors, I feel convinced that no reader of this volume can fall into the mistake of supposing that the quotations given from such writers as Huser, Dzierzon, LANGsrrotu, QvinBy, Cook, Root, CHESHIRE, Lussock, MiiLLeR, and many others are meant to supersede the necessity of studying the original works from which those quotations are taken ; on the contrary, they cannot fail to excite the desire to do so on the part of all who, after the general view here given, shall wish seriously to pursue the study. On all practical points of working detail I have given the practice followed by myself, and with special regard to the experience of myself and others in the peculiar circumstances of the Australasian colonies. On many of these points the beginners in these countries could find no reliable guide in any of the European or American works, for although there are in both of those continents some honey-pro- ducing districts similarly situated, at least in point of climate, to the semi-tropical parts of Australasia, yet it happens that all the standard works on apiculture have had their origin in places situate in com- paratively high latitudes, where the severe winters and the absence of an evergreen flora tend to place the practice of bee-keeping upon essentially different principles in many respects. Many subjects indirectly connected with practical apiculture are also introduced in this volume which I have not seen touched upon in any other work. Among these I would direct special attention to Chapter XIX. In order not to confuse the novice I have given, in all ordinary matters, full details of such methods as I have adopted and consider the best; but in special cases, where there is some divergence of opinion, I have also described the plans recommended by some of the leading apiarists of the day, and in every case I have sought to bring the accounts of improvements in the art down to the latest date. viii. PREFACE, I have spared no trouble or expense in procuring the numerous illustrations which appeared to mo to be necessary for the complete- ness of the work; and notwithstanding the necessary difference in price of the book as compared with the former editions, I trust it may be considered in that respect, as well as in regard to the style of bring- ing it out, as creditable to the publishing trade of New Zealand. I. HOPKINS, Maramata, Auckuanp, N.Z., JANUARY, 1886, ERRATA. Page 27 line 15—For fasciaca, read fasciata. » 72 ,, 1—After the word ‘‘ which” insert “the eges of.” » 86 ,, 11—For execeted, read excreted. » 117 ,, 1—For fig. 39, read fig. 37. » 131 ,, 2 (from bottom)—For Qin. read 1#in. and in ee er ee | + For 1#ia., read 2in. «, 157 4 8 “3 For “1,8001lbs. ” read 1,4501bs. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY AND HISTORICAL. Antiquity of the Use of Honey—Origin of the Art of Bee-keeping— Modern Art of Bee-keeping—Bee-keeping in New Zealand and Australia--Introduction of the Black or German Bee into New Zealand—Introduction of Italian Bees—Imrroved System of Bee- keeping in New Zcaland—Introduction of Bees and Bee Culture into Australia and Tasmania—Italian Bees in Queensland, in New South Wales, in Victoria, in South Australia, in Tasmania —Suitability of New Zealand and Australia for Apiculture— Climate—Native Flora—Importance of Apiculture as an Industry —Protits of Bee-keeping—Adaptation to Women—Advice to Be- ginners—State Aid to Apiculture—Bee Publications ... 1—24 CHAPTER II. THE HONEY BEE, ITS VARIETIES AND DISTRIBUTION. Apis Mellifica—Geographical Distribution of its Varieties—German or Black Bee—Italian or Ligurian Bee —Markings of pure Italian Bees— Hy brids— German, Italian, Cyprian, Syrian and Palestine Bees—Carniolans, Herzegovian, Dalmatian, Koumelian, and Hy- mettus Bees—Other Races of Bees—Native Bees of New Zealand and Australia aa a oe is 25—39 CHAPTER III. INMATES OF THE HIVE, THEIR NATURAL HISTORY. General Description—The Queen—The Drone—The Worker— Physiology and Anatomy of the Honey. Bee—Classification of Species—General Characteristics of Structure—Nervous System x. CONTENTS, —Respiratory Organs—Air-Sacs of Bees—The Head—The Eyes —The Mouth—The Antennze—Senses of Hearing and Smelling— The Wings—The Legs—The Honey Sac—The Sting—Repro- ductive Organs of Queen—Parthenogenesis—Dzierzon Theory — Development from Egg to the Bee—Fertile Workers—Relation of Bees to Flowers ee we wh 40—79 CHAPTER IV. WHAT BRES COLLECT, AND WHAT THEY PRODUCE. Honey—Nectar of Blossoms—Adulteration of Honey—Honey - Dew— Wax—Bees Wasting Wax—Extravagant Waste of Wax—Method of rendering Wax — Comb, how constructed—Advantages of the hexagonal form of Cells—Pollen and Bee-Bread—Artificial Pollen—Propolis 8s sais il os 80—98 CHAPTER V. THE APIARY. Location—General Arrangement—Shade—Water—Area of Ground— Arrangement of Hives—Extracting House and Honey Store— Workshop and Hive Store —Fumigating House — Stocking ti.e Apiary—Moving Hives—House Apiary ... aah 99—110 CHAPTER VI. HIVES, FRAMES, AND SECTION BOXES. Movable Comb Hives—Choice of a Hive—An ideal Hive—Various forms now in use—The Langstroth Hive—General Description —-Instructions for making—Body of Hive—Bottom Board— Alighting Board — Cover — Half-Story Hives— Hive Cramp— Nucleus Hive—Observatory Hive—Timber for Hive-making— Painting Hives—Frames--Narrow or brood Frames—Broad, or Section Frames—Half-story Frames—Frame Form—Number of Frames to a Hive—Mats for covering Frames—Section Boxes— Requisites_ of good Sections—To Make sections—One Piece Sections—Putting dovetailed Sections together—Clinching the Dovetails— Separators — Dispensing with Separators — Section Racks and Cases—The Bedien Section Case—Honey Boards — How to construct Honey Boards and Section Cases ~111—144 CONTENTS. xi. CHAPTER VII. THE HONEY EXTRACTOR, AND MANIPULATION OF EXTRACTED HONEY. Strained or pressed and melted Honey—Invention of the Centrifugal Extractor — Two-comb Extractor— Single-comb Extractor — Six- comb Extractor—Preparing Combs for_extracting—Uncapping Knife—Unecapping Can—Broken-Comb Basket—Manipulation of extracted Honey—Arrangement of Extracting House ; 145—15 CHAPTER VIII. COMB-FOUNDATION. History of the Invention—Advantages derived from its Use—Principal Points of good Foundation—Comb Foundation Machines—Drone Cell Foundation—Progress of Manufacture—To fasten Foundation in Frames—To Fasten Foundation in Sections—Wired Foundation —Wiring the Frames—-Imbedding the Foundation — To secure straight Combs ss 8 as fa 158-170 CHAPTER IX. MANIPULATION OF BEES, AND FEEDING. Handling Bees—Bee Veil—Bee Gloves—Quieting Bees—Smokers— Fuel for Smokers—How to open a Hive—Comb Holders—Cures for Stings—Feeding—Feeding for Winter—Stimulative Feeding— What and When to feed—How to feed Syrup .... 171—182 CHAPTER X. TRANSFERRING. Implements Required—Wires and Clasps--Transferring Board — Driving—Fixing Combs in Frames—Mr. Heddon’s new Practice, —Open Driving sie ine ; sts 183—187 CHAPTER XI. INCREASE OF STOCKS, NATURAL SWARMING, DIVIDING. What Rate of Increase is desirable ?—Circumstances which affect a Decision— Mode of attaining the Object—Natural Swarming— xii,” CONTENTS, Causes of Swarming—The eo Season— Symptoms of Swarming—Issue of the Swarm—Objections raised against Natural Swarming—Preparing for Swarms—Swarm Box—Taking and Hiving Swarms—Absconding Swarms—Clipping the Queen’s Wing —Process of clipping — After-Swarms— Prevention of Swarming—Prevention of After-Swarming—Supplying the old Stock with Fertile Queen—Preventing Increase of Colonies— Dividing ss ane aes ve oe 188 —207 CHAPTER XII. QUEEN REARING. Necessity of the Practice—A Word concerning Drones—Entrance Guarés—How to secure choice Queen Cells—Forming Nuclei—How to insert Queen Cells—My Method of forming Nucleiand inserting Queen Cells—Mating Young Queens—Necessary Distance apart of different Races to insure pure Mating—Queen Nurseries— Introducing Queens —Direct Introduction of Queens—Introducing Virgin Queens—‘“ Shipping ” Queens—Shipping whole Colonies 208—230 CHAPTER XIII. SURPLUS HONEY, MODE OF SECURING AND MARKETING. Spring Management—Division Boards ~Spreading Brood—Putting on surplus Boxes—Reversing Frames—Heddon’s reversible Frames -— Queen Excluder Honey Board—Taking surplus Honey— Ripening Honey—Comb Baskets—Marketing Honey—Extracted Honey—Comb Honey—Benefits of co-operation ... 231—243 CHAPTER XIV. WINTERING, UNITING. Difference in Character of Winter Seasons—Australasian Winters— Precautions for Wintering—Reducing interior Room in Hive.— Providing Food—Inner Covering of Frames—Reducing Entrance —Securing Covers— Providing Winter Forage —Ventilation— Chaff Hives—To make a Chaff Hive—Providing Space above Frames in Winter—Uniting weak and queenless Colonies— Uniting Swarms 3 a ga : 244—251 CHAPTER XV. ROBBER BEES. Causes of Robbing—How to know Robber Bees—Precautions to be observed—Bee Tents—How to stop Robbing .. 252—255 CONTENTS. xiii. CHAPTER XVI. DISEASES OF BEES. Dysentery and its Prevention—Bacillus alvei (foul brood)—Symptoms of Bacillus alvei—Investigations of Mr, Frank Cheshire—Bacillus alvei under the Microscope—Tho Cheshire Cure—The Salicylic Acid Remedy—Bacillus Gaytoni—Other Diseases of Bees—Ar- renotokia—Spray Diffuser bis a a8 256—268 CHAPTER XVII. ENEMIES OF BEES. Australasian Exemptions—Spiders —Mice---Ants—-Bee-hawk (dbellula) +The Bee or Wax-moth—Tinea cereana—Damage to Combs— Remedies—Bee-mite—A Caution to Importers of Bees—Fumi- gating Combs... i sit ee 269—277 CHAPTER XVIII. BEE FORAGE, Ordinary Sources—Native Flora of New Zealand—Native Flora of Australia --New South Wales—South Australia — Victoria — Queensland—Tasmania—Eucaly pti and Acaciasin New Zealand— European Plants and Tiees—American Plants and Trees—Bass- wood—Sages — Horse Mint—Figwort—Golden Rods — Asters— Spider Plant—Mellilot Clover—Giant Mignonette—Duration of the Honey Season—Flight of Bees—Over-stocking ... 278—296 CHAPTER XIX. APICULTURE IN RELATION TO AGRICULTURE. Are Bees Trespassers ?—Beneficial Influence of Bees on Agriculture— Can bees harm the Soil or the Crops ?—Saccharine Matter of Plants not derived from the Soil—Derived from the Atmosphere and Rain Water—Nectar of Plants intended to attract Insects— Sometimes thrown off as superfluous—Superfluous Nectar eva- porated if not taken by Insects—Question as to grazing Stock— Quantity of Honey furnished by pasture Lands—Proportion yossibly consumed by Stock—Bee-keeping as a Branch of tacmine oa a 297—307 CHAPTER XX. USES OF HONEY FOR FOOD, DRINKS, MANUFACTURES AND MEDICINE, Honey as Food—For Domestic Cookery—For Preserves—Moderation in Use—Deleterious Honey —Fermented Drinks —Manufactures — Honey as Medicine—Recipes—Honey Cakes—-Mead —Metheglin— Miodomel — Fruit Wine with Honey —Light Beverages — Medicinal “ wht se ‘ 308—319 CHAPTER XXI. CALENDAR, BEEKEEPERS AXIOMS. Variability of Seasons—Use of Meteorological Observations—Calendar, adapted to Auckland, New Zealand—Bee-keepers’ Axioms 320—321 GLOSSARY... a bag si das sits 326—330 INDEX... Sn eh ade ae ise 331—335 1G. ; PAGE 1. German or Black Queen 28 2. Italian Queen .. 29 3. Abdomen of Italian Worker 32 4. The Queen Bee 41 5. The Drone 42 6. The Worker 42 7. Wings of a bee 46 8. Nervous system of the bee.. 47 9. Trachea, magnified . 48 10. Respiratory organs of the bee 49 il. Airsacsandovariesof queen 50 12. Air sacs of worker 50 13. Head of worker bee .. 51 14, Hooklets of wings 56 15. Hind leg of bee, showing pollen basket.. 57 16. Anterior leg of worker, magnified 58 17. Bee sting, magnified 60 18. Ovaries of queen ate - 63 19. Queen’s egg under the mi- croscope ‘ .. 69 20. From the egg to ‘the bee 70 21. Worker nymph and larva, in comb i “i 71 22. Worker larve and queen cells ‘ 72 23. Queen cells puiltover worker cells 8 ae 7h 24. Salvia officinalis, young fluwer visited by a bee i7 25, Ditto, stamens and anthers 78 26. Ditto, older flower, with pis- til developed .. 7 27. Under side of abdomen of worker bee, showing wax pockets and wax scales 88 28. The Gerster wax extractor 91 29. Jones’ wax extractor 92 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. FRONTISPIECE : Burwood Apiary, Matamata. FIG. 30. 31. 32, 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41, 42. 43, 44, 45. 46, 47, 48. 49, 50. 51. 52. 53. 54, 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61, PAGE Worker cells'and drone-cells Hexagonal cells Circular cells on Pollen grains under the mi- croscope Water bottle 4 Arrangement of hives House apiary for 20 hives .. Movable comb-hive .. Two-storied Langstrothhive End of hive (inside view) .. Ditto (outside view) ., si Side of hive (inside view) .. Showing how the different parts of the hive go to- gether .. i Bottom board .. Alighting board i End of cover (inside view). . Side of cover, ditto Ridge board of cover Roof board of cover .. Cover complete Hive cramp ‘5 Nucleus hive, with | cover and mat Observatory hive Narrow or brood frame Broad or section frame, with sections and tin separators Half-story frame, with sec- tions and tin separator .. Frame form or gauge One-pound section box, with starter of comb-foundation One piece section Section cramp and form Prize section rack The Heddon section case .. 93 of 94 96 102 103 110 M11 116 119 119 120 135 136 137 139 140 xvi. FIG. 62. 63. G4, 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71, 72. 73. TA, 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 84a, 85. 86. 87. 88. 89, 90. 91. 92, 93. 94, 95. 96. 97. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE Heddon’s honey board 142 Honey extractor 147 Framework for two- comb extractor ke us «. 148 ‘Little Wonder” .. 149 Reversible six-comb honeys extyactor, with one basket detached. 150 Cowan's automatic basket... 151 Root’s uncapping knife 152 Bingham and Hetherington knife, with cap-catcher .. 152 Dadant’s uncapping can 153 Broken-comb basket. . 154 Cross-section of extracting house, with view of ex- tractor, strainer,andtanks 155 Ground plan of ditto.. 156 Comb foundation .. .. 158 A. I. Root’s 10in. roller machine 161 The Given press : 162 Gauge for trimming founda- tion 6 164 Comb-i foundation board 165 Mode of fastening inframe 165 Wax-smelter : 166 Parker’s comb-lever .. 167 Wired frame 168 Wiring board . 169 Easterday’s wire imbedder 169 Device for securing straight combs ‘ 170 Wire-cloth bee-veil .. 172 Tarlatan bee-veil . 172 Clark’s cold-blast smoker .. 174 Bingham’s direct-draught smoker ae . lid Comb-holder 176 “Simplicity” comb- holder... 177 “Simplicity” feeder .. 181 Grey’s entrance feeder 182 Transferring wiresandclaps 183 Transterring board 184 Pieces of comb transferred to frame 185 Jones’ entrance guard . 210 Alley’s drone excluder, drone and queen trap 210 FIG. 98. Comb containing eggs 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112, 11d. 115. 116. 117, 118. 119. 120. 121, 122. 123, 124, 126. 127. 128, 129, 180. 131. 132, 133. 139. Frame for raising queen cells on . we Frame of queen cells Comb stand sa Inserted queen cell, from which queen has emerged Alley’s queen nursery Alley’s queen nursery cage Alley’s introducing cage Queen shipping cage ‘ Benton’s shipping cage for two queens Division board . Hive with division boards... Heddon’s reversible frame.. Queen excluder Bliss’ sun evaporator.. . Comb basket Shipping crate and show case for comb-honey Brickell’s chaff-hive .. Hill’s device Bee tent .. Bacilli a Bacilli spores .. : Healthy juices of larva B. alvei (last stage) B. alvei (early stage).. B. alvei (late stage) Spray diffuser .. . Bee-hawk (Libellula) Bee-moth.. ‘ Male and female beo-moth Silken tube of bee-moth larva Silken tube in comb . Larvee of bee-moth Comb destroyed es moth larvee .. é American linden or bass- wood a Horse-mint of lexnaie, . Figwort .. é . Three varietiosof golden rods . Aster . Spider plant . Mellilot clover Giant mignonette GE ra 212 214 216 217 221 221 223 227 232 233 237 238 239 240 243 250 255 260 260 261 261 262 262 268 271 272 273 273 274 274 275 288 290 291 292 293 294 295 CHAPTER L. INTRODUCTORY AND HISTORICAL. In the whole range of created objects presented to our con- templation in the study of what we familiarly call Naturg, from the inconceivably great systems of inanimate matter rolling in infinite space to the inconceivably small but animated forms revealed by the microscope, there is probably no class more calculated to excite our wonder and admiration than that of Jnsects ; and of all the different kinds of insects there is none more interesting as an object of study, and none that can be made more useful and profitable to man, than the Honey Bee. Its history is as old as that of the human race ; its product, honey, was recognised in the earliest ages as a most desirable, almost an indispensable, addition to the food of man: and yet it is only now, some 3400 years after its first authentic historical mention, that we are beginning to realise the full economic importance of that product and to avail our- selves fully of the bounty of Providence, evidenced not only in its production, but also in the endowment of the bee with those wonderful instincts which render its collection so easy. ANTIQUITY OF THE USE OF HONEY. A certain proportion of saccharine matter in the food of man appears to be essential for his sustenance in a healthy condition, and previous to the comparatively modern invention of preparing sugar from vegetable juices, the only form in which such saccharine matter was attainable in a concentrated- state was that of honey. The temperate or semi-tropical climate of that part of the globe which formed “ the cradle of the human race” was most favourable to the spontaneous spreading of the honey-bee and the collection of surplus honey in its natural hives or nests. These would be built in the hollows of trees, in the clefts and under the ledges of rucks, as they are at the present day in such climates, and their stores B 2 AUSTRALASIAN would soon be discovered by men engaged in the grazing of flocks and herds in a very thinly populated land. It is not, therefore, surprising that in the Scriptures of the Old Testa- ment, the earliest written records of the human race, we find frequent reference made to honey as a thing universally known and intimately connected with the comforts of man. The name is said to be ghoneg in the original Hebrew, signifying “delight,” evidently the root of the German word “ honig,” which easily becomes ‘‘ honey” in English. The name is used generally in the ancient Scriptures in combination with that of milk, the most universal of all foods, to form the Oriental metaphor denoting abundance—“ a land flowing with milk and honey” being the words used in nearly twenty passages of those writers, from Moses down to the prophet Ezekiel, to describe the country promised to the descendants of Jacob. In the non-historical parts of Scripture, the Prophecies, the Psalms of David, the Song of Solomon, Proverbs, and the book of Sirach, the words “honey” and “ honey-comb” are always used as the types of everything good and wholesome as well as sweet; in the last mentioned book (which, though its canonical value is a matter of dispute, may be safely quoted in this respect) it is distinctly mentioned as one of the necessaries of life. In the historical portions it is first mentioned as one of the choice articles sent as a present by Jacob to the tuler of the Egyptians when his sons went to that people to obtain a supply of corn during a time of scarcity, about 3600 years ago. Some 700 years later King Jeroboam sent a “ cruse of honey” with other presents to propitiate the prophet Ahijah. A curious case is mentioned about Samson (in the twelfth century before our Christian era) finding “a swarm of bees and honey in the carcass of the lion” which he had killed some time before. In explanation of this strange sort of bee- hive, we are told that in the climate of Palestine, in some hot seasons, dead bodies are often so quickly dried up that they become like mummies and remain a long time undecayed, so that a swarm of bees might well select the inside of a dricd-w lion’s body (supposing it to have been disembowelled) to build in.* Somewhat later in date a circumstance is related of * Possibly some such case may have given rise to the extraordinary thi i ane by Virgil that bees were generated in the decaying dnttalls of BEE MANUAL. 3 Jonathan, with a part of Saul’s army, entering a wood and finding “honey on the ground.” ‘ When the people came into the wood, behold the honey dropped,” and Jonathan refreshed himself by “ putting forth the end of the rod that was in his hand and dipping it in a honey-comb and putting his hand to his mouth.” This is very interesting as showing so clearly how honey was then commonly obtained. About the year 1023 B.c. honey is mentioned as one of the things supplied by friendly hands for the refreshment of David and his followers when ‘they were hungry and weary and thirsty in the wilderness ;” and three centuries later it is enumerated amongst the things of which tithes were to be paid to the Levite priests by order of King Hezekiah. Finally, it is men- tioned in the Prophecy of Ezekiel, when describing the ancient commerce of Tyre, as an article of commerce sent to that port from Palestine. ORIGIN OF THE ART OF BEE-KEEPING. Those passages relating to honey in the writings of the Old Testament are quite sufficient to prove the great antiquity of its use, but they give us no grounds for looking upon the patriarchs and the early inhabitants of the earth as bee-keepers ; on the contrary, there is ample evidence afforded that, at the time referred to, honey was obtained from the natural haunts of the bees—in the forests and rocky pasture lands—just as it may be obtained at the present day in the bush districts of warm climates, and especially in parts of India, where the bees build not so much in the hollows of trees as in the open air in the branches, and under ledges of rock on the sides of hills. The climate of Palestine, Assyria, and Egypt is quite suited to the natural propagation of bees in the woodsand “‘wildernesses” on the borders of the Arabian desert, and the nomadic life of the shepherds and cattle-herds afforded the best opportunities for tracing the bees to their haunts and collecting the wild honey. We may then fairly conclude that such were the sources from which honey was ordinarily obtained by the inhabitants of those Kastern countries, and we have no reason to suppose that they practised any art of bee-keeping, or knew anything abcut a system of providing bees with artificial dwellings and inducing them to gather honey and to store it in a manner more convenient to man. We must suppose that the “4 AUSTRALASIAN ‘haunts of the wild bees, when found, had to be pillaged with the aid of smoke or sulphur fumes, and that the operation ‘was not always an agreeable one we may conclude from the way in which bees are mentioned in the few passages of ‘Scripture where they are incidentally alluded to, as in Deut. i. 44, where Moses, recapitulating all that had happened to the Israelites during their migration, tells them, ‘The Amorites came out against you and chased you as bees do.” And in Psalm exviii. 13, “They (the heathens) encompassed me about like bees.” Amongst the Western nations the civilised Greeks had un- questionably practised the art of bee-keeping at a very early period. The laws of Solon, 600 years B.C., contain regulations as to the distances apart at which bee-hives may be kept ; and ‘both Greéks and Romans wrote ana sang about bees and bee- keeping from the times of Homer down to those of Aristotle, Virgil, Palladius, Pliny, and Columella. It is very probable that the Romans first introduced the practice into Palestine. The term “wild” honey is never met with in the ancient ‘Scriptures, simply because ail’ honey deserved that name in those times;*but the Evangelists Matthew and Mark, who wrote when Palestine had been for nearly a century virtually ‘a Roman: Province, both use the term “locusts and wild honey.” We may conclude that at that time the people were accustomed to keep bees in artificial hives, and they would naturally make ‘a distinction between honey so obtained and that gathered by “wild ” bees in the “ wildernesses ” or unfrequented places. When Alexander carried his conquests into India, in the fourth century B.v., he found honey so plentiful there that he imposed a tribute payable in honey and'wax. The Romans, at a much later period, levied a tribute of 200,000 lbs. of wax yearly upon Corsica, and the countries of the “barbarians ” outside the limits of the Roman Empirein Europe were known to produce (and certainly without any art of bee-keepiug) large quantities of both honey and wax. Inthe early part of the third century, when the Goths were gradually migrating towards the Roman Provinces, Gibbon ‘mentions that when they took possession of the present Russian district of the Ukraine,* “ The plenty of game'and fish; the innumerable bee- * This is the part of Russia from which the largest quantiti f obtained at the present day. Pe SpE OnE ore BEE MANUAL, 5. hives deposited in the hollows of old trees and in the cavities of rocks, and forming, even in that rude age, a valuable branch of commerce, . . . all displayed the liberality of nature and tempted the industry of man.” The same writer tells us that in the time of Constantine the Great (A.D. 306 to 337) the people of Chersonesus (the present Crimea) were supplied from the Roman Provinces of the East, with corn and manu- factures “ which they purchased with their only productions, salt, wax and hides.” The ambassadors of Theodosius II. to Attila, king of the Huns, when travelling through part of the country now called Hungary (about a.D. 450) “received from the con- tiguous villages a plentiful supply of provisions,” amongst which is noted “mead instead of wine.” But however primitive may have been the mode of obtaining honey in those unsettled countries, great progress, both in the art of bee-keeping and in mercantile dealings in honey and wax, must have been made in the civilised provinces, as it is mentioned, on the authority of a writer named Synesius, that when the Goths, under Alaric, sacked the city of Athens, A.D. 396, that city “was at that time less famous for its schools of philosophy than for its trade in honey.” In the seventh century the Emperor Heraclius raised a sort of forced loan from the churches at Constantinople to meet some war expenses, and on that occasion it is related that barrels of honey (ostensibly) packed away among the church stores were found. to be really filled with gold. This anecdote serves to indicate how extensively honey was used, and how it was kept in those times. About the same time, when Persia was overrun by the Saracen Caliph, after the great battle of Nehavend, the fugitive general of the Persians was stopped and overtaken ‘in a crowd of camels and mules laden with honey,” an incident which, as Gibbon remarks, “ however slight or singular, will denote the luxurious impedimenta of an Oriental army.” It is also related that Mahomet, who was very temperate and sparing in his diet, ‘“ delighted in the taste of milk and honey ;” and that this taste was general among the Arabs we may conclude from the circumstance mentioned by Gibbon, that with them “the perfection of language out-stripped the refinements of manners, and their speech could diversify the fourscore names of honey.” 6 AUSTRALASIAN In the earliest history of the Russian people, in the ninth and tenth centuries, we find mentioned among the chief articles of their trade, “the spoils of their bee-hives and the hides of their cattle,” and “their native commodities of furs, wax, and hydromel ;” and a Greek historian, describing the state of Britain at the time of the visit of the Greek Emperor Manuel (about 1400), says: “The land is overspread with towns and villages ; though destitute of vines, and not abounding in fruit trees, it is fertile in wheat and barley, in honey and wool.” The true history of the rise and progress of the art of bee- keeping amongst the Greeks and Romans, and its extension over Europe during the middle ages, is as yet unwritten, but there can be no doubt that amongst the Northern nations the use of honey became with time more and more a matter of necessity, much of their fermented liquors being prepared from it, and the more northern the positions, and the more severe the winter seasons, the more essential it became to domesticate the bees, or use artificial means for preserving them during the winter months. The primitive system of bee-keeping adopted in the earliest period of Greek civilisation seems to have been followed with little change or improvement by the Romans and the nations which rose upon the ruins of that empire, and to have been handed down from father to son almost unaltered until the close of the last century. In the first half of the present century some important improvements were introduced into England, especially by Thomas Nutt, a self-instructed apiarist, who was one of the first to condemn and abolish the barbarous custom of destroying the bees with sulphur, and to invent and practice a more rational and humane method of taking the surplus honey in separate boxes and bell-glasses. Since the middle of the seventeenth century much attention had been paid to the natural history of the bee and other insects by Von Swammerdam in Holland, Maraldi in Italy, Réaumur, Lepeletier and Latreille in France, Bonnet in Switzerland, Linneus in Sweden, and by Dr. John Hunter and Dr. Bevan in England; but it is to the researches and discoveries of Huber and Dzierzon that we are indebted for that knowledge of the physiology of the honey-bee which has led to those great practical improvements which may be said to constitute the BEE MANUAL. 7 MODERN ART OF BEE-KEEPING. This may be considered to have commenced with the second half of the present century, although the most important strides in the progress of the honey industry have only taken place within the last twenty years. In the year 1845, the results of Dzierzon’s investigations were first made known in the Eichstadt Bienen-Zeitung, and in 1848 his book on the “Theory and Practice of Bee Culture” was published at the instance of the Prussian Government. Not many years afterwards, Lang- stroth’s work on “The Hive and Honey Bee,” and Quinby’s “Mysteries of Bee-keeping Explained,” appeared almost simul- taneously in America. All these men had been working inde- pendently for some twenty years, studying the habits of the bee, and inventing a hive and a system which should enable the apiarist to control the working of his bees, and to obtain the largest amount of surplus honey without injury to them. They all attained a very high degree of success, and they bestowed the knowledge of their successful labours upon the public nearly at the same time. All their works have great and independent merits, and must always remain as classics in bee literature. To Dzierzon must be allowed the merit of having so completely worked out and supplemented Huber’s theory with regard to the physiology of the bee, and also the priority at least in the publication of his system of bar-hives. Lang- stroth and Quinby both produced frame-hives, simpler and more practical than that of Dzierzon, and each of them have their advocates to the present day. Subsequently the inven- tion of the honey extractor, of comb-foundation, and a number of ingenious implements and appliances, have led to a complete revolution in the practice of bee-keeping, and helped to raise it to the rank of an important national industry which can no longer be neglected in any country possessing the natural capa- bilities for its establishment. BEE-KEEPING IN NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA. None of the countries of the New World, of North or South America, or of Australasia, were found, when first dis- covered, to possess any variety of the true honey-bee (Apis mellifica) ; a necessary preliminary, therefore, to the practice of bee-culture in any of those regions was the introduction of bees 8 AUSTRALASIAN from the old country, an operation which was attended with .far greater difficulties even forty or fifty years ago than in these days of rapid steam navigation. INTRODUCTION OF THE BLACK OR GERMAN BEE INTO NEW ZEALAND. The first bees introduced into New Zealand are said to have arrived in the ship Westminster, in the early part of 1840. These bees belonged to Lady Hobson, wife of the first Governor. and were watehed over on board the vessel by Mr. McElwaine, the Governor’s gardener. They were landed at the Bay of Islands. Mr. William Mason, who was, at the period above mentioned, Government Architect and Inspector of Public Works, told me that he distinctly recollected seeing the bees on board the ship, and that they were in straw hives, which were wrapped in blankets. He believed they remained at the Bay when the Government party left to establish the seat of government on the Waitemata, now the city of Auckland. Dieffenbach, in his “Travels in New Zealand,” mentions having seen (in December, 1840) a hive of bees, thriving remarkably well, with the Rev. Richard Taylor at Waimate, but says “the bees had been introduced into New Zealand from New South Wales.” This may be an error. It is not improbable that the hives referred to may have been stocked with some of Lady Hobson’s bees, but it is also quite possible that they may have been brought from New South Wales where they had been first introduced in 1822. For the introduction of bees into this colony we are also indebted to the late Rev. William Charles Cotton, and to Mrs. Allom, mother of our respected and esteemed fellow- citizen, A. J. Allom, Esq., of Parawai. With regard to Mr. Cotton’s success, I quote the following from the British Bee Journal of January 1st, 1880 :— ‘*In 1841 Mr. Cotton became chaplain to the late Bishop of New Zealand, Dr. Selwyn, with whom he embarked on board the Tomatin at Plymouth, on the 30th December of that year. On the voyage out, and subsequently, Mr. Cotton rendered the Bishop much assistance in transluting the Bible into the native tongue. “Mr. Cotton took with him four stocks of bees; and many marvellous stories are told of his mastery over his favourites on ship board. He was very successful in the introduction of the cultivation BEE MANUAL, 9 of bee-keeping in his adopted country, and in 1848 he produced his ‘Manual for New Zealand Bee-keepers,’ published at Wellington, New Zealand. Before the introduction of the honey bee intu New Zealand, they had to send over to England every year for the white clover seed (7'rifolium repens), as it did not seed freely there, but b the agency of the bees they are now able to export it. New Zealan is such a good country for bees, that Mr. Cotton told me, one stock had increased to twenty-six in one year. The natives call the bee the white man’s fly.” Mrs. Allom, the lady before referred to, some time in 1842 (as Iam informed by Mr. Allom), serit some colonies of bees to Nelson and Wellington ; those sent to Nelson were con- signed to Captain Wakefield, the then head of that settlement, and reached their destination safely, while those forwarded to Wellington died before arrival. This lady’s claim has never before, as far as I know or can ascertain, been recognised except by the Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Adelphi, London. That Society awarded her the Silver Isis Medal in 1845, for her “communication respecting her successful introduction of bees to New Zealand.” From the bees thus introduced in the years 1840 to 1842 have sprung the whole of the black stock of New Zealand. INTRODUCTION OF ITALIAN BEES INTO NEW ZEALAND. Previous to the year 1880 several unsuccessful attempts were made to introduce Ligurian bees into this colony. I believe the Honourable Thomas Russell, C.M.G., spent a large sum of money to secure this object, but in vain. The hot weather encountered in the passage from America to this country, and also the imperfect knowledge as to the best mode of packing bees to travel long distances, acted as almost in- superable barriers to their introduction. By these repeated failures, however, apiarists gained knowledge, and as a result, in September, 1880, two splendid colonies of Ligurians were landed in Auckland—one consigned to the Acclimatisation Society, Christchurch, the other to Mr. J. H. Harrison, Coro- mandel. Too much praise cannot be given to Captain Cargill, who took charge of the little creatures from the moment they were shipped and personally attended to all their wants on the passage across. These hives came from Los Angelos County, California, and were procured by Mr. R. J. Creighton, the 10 AUSTRALASIAN New Zealand Government representative, to whom much praise is due. This consignment, owing to the method of packing, having been so successful, Messrs. Hopkins and Clark, of the Parawai Apiary, took steps to procure some colonies, and two were received in due course from Ventura County, California. These, too, were received in splendid condition, thanks again to the care taken of them by Captain Cargill. Following upon this I obtained from America two other con- signments, in all twenty nuclei and two full colonies. An event of considerable importance in the history of bee-keeping in New Zealand was the first successful importation of queens direct from Italy. After some correspondence with Mr. Full- wood, of Brisbane, I decided to give the matter a trial, and the result was that four out of eight queens shipped at Naples by Mr. Chas. Bianconcini on 10th of November, 1883, arrived in good condition at the Matamata Apiary on the 11th of January, 1884. Another shipment was made later in the same year, when six out of twelve queens arrived alive. Since the first importations numbers of Italian queens have been reared and distributed over the colony ; fresh importations have been made by other parties, and the greater number of New Zealand apiaries are now being Italianised. These bees flourish splen- didly in this country, and will, Iam quite sure, eventually replace with profit the German or common black bee. A full account of the Ligurian bee is given in another chapter. IMPROVED SYSTEM OF BEE-KEEPING IN NEW ZEALAND. Till within the last five or six years bee-keeping here was, with a few exceptions, in a very backward state. The hives in general use were composed of old gin cases, candle boxes, and in fact any wooden material in the shape of a case that was handy to the bee-keeper when his colonies happened to swarm. Asa rule, no preparations were made for the swarm- ing season, and it was not until the swarm was in the air that the need of a spare hive was realised. These boxes in some cases have been so neglected that they have actually fallen to pieces through age, and the bees left exposed to the weather. The sulphur pit has, I am sorry to say, not been unknown here, and it is in use even at the present day. In a German work on bees the following epitaph is given, which, as Langstroth remarks, might be properly placed over every pit BEE MANUAL. ll of brimstoned bees, as a brand of disgrace to those who practise this horrid system :— HERE RESTS, CUT OFF FROM USEFUL LABOUR, A COLONY oF INDUSTRIOUS BEES, BaSELY MURDERED BY ITS UNGRATEFUL AND IGNORANT OWNER. But this most barbarous and cruel practice is fast passing away, through the efforts of more enlightened and humane bee-keepers. Amongst those who have done good service in this direction is Dr. Irving, of Canterbury, who, soon after his arrival there in 1879, took steps to put bee-culture in the South Island on a proper footing. To do this, he placed a modern hive, con- taining a colony of bees, in the Public Gardens at Christchurch, and occasionally delivered lectures, with experiments, to those interested in bee-keeping. He has also written many interest- ing and valuable articles on bee-culture in the Canterbury Times. He was elected first president of the Christchurch Bee- keepers’ Association, which he was mainly instrumental in founding. About the same time, with the object of giving information to our bee-keeping settlers, I wrote a series of articles upon bee-culture, which appeared in our local papers, and which created such a large amount of interest and produced so many requisitions to me to publish them in book form, that I was induced, in the year 1881, to publish the first edition of this Maaoual. The extent of the newly-awakened interest in the improved system of culture was shown by the fact that a new edition of the work was required within thirteen months ; and that being now exhausted, I am led to lay before the public the third edition in its present revised and greatly enlarged form. In July, 1883, the New Zealand and Australian Bee Journal was started by Mr. J. C. Firth, under my editorship, I having in the meantime entered into arrangements with that gentleman for the establishment aud working of extensive 12 AUSTRALASIAN apiaries on the Matamata estate. The Journal was, for two years, widely circulated and ably supported by. the literary contributions of enthusiastic and successful apiarists in New Zealand and the Australian colonies. It was, for reasons given at the time, incorporated with the New Zealand Farmer, Bee and Poultry Journal, in June, 1885. Attractive displays of honey and of apiarian appliances have been made at the last two annual shows of the Auckland Horticultural Society. The New Zealand Bee-keepers’ Asso- ciation was formally constituted on the 7th of August, 1884, and held its first annual meeting this year. It forms an admi- rable centre point for the combined action of all New Zealand bee-keepers in their endeavours to promote the general interests of the industry in the colony. The Auckland Provincial Bee- keepers’ Association has been in operation since February, 1884, and its proceedings are likely to help effectively in ad- -vancing the new industry, especially in the Waikato district. Other local associations are about being formed, and it is hoped that the example will be followed wherever there is a sufficient number of apiarists living within such a distance of each other, or of their common centre, as may render their regular peri- odical meetings practicable. A great many persons in different parts of the country have already taken up bee-keeping with the intention of making it their sole or principal occupation ; many others have commenced to practise the improved system. of culture on a small scale, for their own gratification and. the supply of honey for their own households. The numbers of both these descriptions of apiarists are increasing every, day. The production of honey in ‘the Auckland province alone is. calculated to have exceeded eighty tons last season. As a further proof of the progress of the industry, we may take the number of hives and other implements sent out by that well-known firm of hive-makers, Messrs. Bagnall Bros. & Co., of Turua, Auckland, since 1879. In the year mentioned, I arranged with them to cut my hives, etc., at their saw-mill, and in 1882 they took over my supply business. Since then the firm has sent hives and all other apiarian implements to every part of, Aus- tralasia, and they are fairly entitled to be called the premier hive-makers of these colonies. In response to some inquiries. I made concerning the number of hives, etc., they had supplied since first commencing the business, Messrs. Bagnall Bros. & Co, BEE MANUAL. 13 kindly sent me the following :—‘ The following figures are as near correct as possible of the number of hives, extractors, and smokers we have supplied: Hives, 4,500; extractors (single and double), 300; smokers, 750. These are the principal items : sections are a very large item ; last season we sent out about 100,000.” Of comb-foundation, since I first commenced making it, I have supplied nearly eight tons. I think we shall not be very far out. if we allow a like number of hives and half as much comb-foundation as being home-made and supplied from other sources. Presuming this to be correct, we have, then, about 9,000 hives and twelve tons of comb-foundation distributed through Australasia—not at all a bad showing for so young an industry. On the whole, there is the gratifying prospect that New Zealand and Australia, before many years have elapsed, shall have taken an important station among honey-producing countries. INTRODUCTION OF BEES AND BEE CULTURE INTO AUSTRALIA AND TASMANIA. The black or German bee was introduced into New South Wales in 1822. The following extract is from Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, for which I am indebted to the kindness of a correspondent in Sydney :— “« Bees were first imported by Captain Wallis, in the ship Isabella, into Sydney, in April, 1822, and from these original hives the stocks were propagated into the interior by the colonists.” Mr. Thos. Lloyd: Hood, of Hobart, has very kindly furnished me with the following information concerning the introduction of bees and state of apiculture in Tasmania. He says :— “« Bees were first introduced into Tasmania by Dr. Wilson, R.N., in the ship Catherine Stewart Forbes, in the year 1831. Great interest was taken in their arrival, and there was a general expression of gratitudé to Dr. Wilson for the disinterested benefit he had conferred on the coiony at considerable trouble and cost to himself. ‘« Bee-keeping here is carried on on the most primitive principles, frame hives and other appliances are only known by repute. Bees are generally kept in some handy sized’ boxes (gin cases, etc.), and at the end of summer these boxes are lifted, and the heavy ones mercilessly put over the ‘sulphur pit ;’ or by the more merciful bee-keepers, the bees are driven into another box, and so on from year to year. Very great interest is now being taken in the improved system and modern appliances since I introduced them last year, and I hear of many'who intend taking up bee-culture as a commercial industry.” 14 AUSTRALASIAN I have not been able to obtain any information as to the introduction of the German bee into South Australia, Victoria, or Queensland. Probably the importation may have been made from New South Wales or Tasmania, and nct direct from Europe. To Mr. C. Fullwood, of Brisbane, I am indebted for much information as to the progress of bee-culture in Queensland. The following extract from a communication of his in the first number of the New Zealand and Australian Bee Journal gives a graphic description of bee-culture uader the old regime :— ‘Some years ago large quantities of bees were kept by farmers and others in a very primitive fashion, and the bush resounded with the hum of the ‘ busy bee.’ Timber getters, wood carters, and aborigines frequently secured large quantities of honey from hollow trees; both the black bee and stingless bee, peculiar to Australia, were found almost everywhere. Gin cases, tea, or any kind of rough boxes were appropriated to bee use, and such is the climate, and the yield of honey so regular, that bees appeared to thrive everywhere, and in any kind of hive, so long as they had a cover under which to build their comb and rear their brood. No skill was demanded in their manage- ment. Given a swarm—put it in a box, on a stand, under a‘sheet of bark ; then look out for swarms in a few weeks; and, after a while, turn up the box, cut out some honey, or drive the bees into another box to go through the process of building and storing, to be again despoiled in like manner. “No thought about the destruction of brood, waste of honey and wax; no care about the queens. Would not know a queen from a drone, or their value in the hive. What matter if a few boxes (stock) perish? Such was the natural increase by swarming that a few losses were of no consequence. ‘* Anybody could keep bees who had courage enough to rob them. The aborigines knew how to doit. With a tomahawk and fire-stick they would attack the ‘ white-fellow sugar bag,’ and driving the bees with smoke, deprived them of their honey. ‘ Pettigrew’s old Irishman’ was not required here to teach the Australian aborigines how to rob the bees by means of smoke. “A few years ago, however, a great: change cameover the land. A moth, unknown previously, commenced its ravages. The bees suc- cumbed before it, and were rapidly swept away. Farmers owning from fifty to two hundred stocks lost all. The bees in the bush gave way also before the terrible onslaught, leaving the invader all but master of the field. Only a very few individuals, by dint of determined persevering watchfulness and care, managed to save « few stockr amid the general devastation. “*Bee-keeping naturally came to be viewed as a very precarious, risky, and unprofitable business ; and, although it has its charms for many, there are but two or three persons in the colony who have any number of stocks, or who attempt bee-keeping as a means of obtaining an income.’ BEE MANUAL, 15 ITALIAN BEES IN QUEENSLAND. In order to remedy this state of things Mr. Fullwood very properly determined to introduce Italian bees, which are known to defend themselves more effectually than the German bee against the inroads of moths, ants, and other enemies. In the year 1880 he brought five queens with himself from Liverpool to Melbourne, and thence to Brisbane. In 1882 he got twelve queens sent direct from Charles Bianconcini of Bologna, and of these five arrived alive ; and again in 1883 he got a second consignment of twelve, of which seven arrived safely. These spirited effoits appear to have been crowned with the success they deserve. The Italian bees seem to be quite able for the moths, and honey in abundance can be gathered by them in Queensland. Owing to Mr. Fullwood’s enterprise and example, a number of people are now turning their attention to bee- keeping, and I have no doubt that in a comparatively short time, Queensland will show to the front as a honey-producing country. ITALIAN BEES IN NEW SOUTH WALES. It is stated by Dr. Gerstaecker, that four stocks of Ligurian bees were shipped in England by Mr. I. W. Woodbury, in Sep- tember, 1862, and that they arrived safely in Australia, after a passage of seventy-nine days. It does not appear, however, that these stocks succeeded and propagated their race, any more than a colony which Mr. Angus Mackay, the present editor of the Town and Country Journal in Sydney, subsequently brought with him to Brisbane, at great expense, from America, Mr. 8. McDonnell, of Sydney, imported two colonies from America in 1880, and succeeded in raising stock from them ; and later Mr. Abrams, a German bee-master, brought some colonies with him from Italy in 1883, settled in Paramatta, and having succeeded in rearing a pure race from his queens, started an apiary for the Italian Bee-Farming Company, of which he is the manager, and Mr. McDonnell secretary. ITALIAN BEES IN VICTORIA. In Victoria, we are told that the late Mr. Edward Wilson had a stock of Ligurians sent out to him in 1862, by Messrs. Neighbour and Sons; but I am informed that no successful attempt had been made to establish the race there until quite 16 AUSTRALASIAN recently, when, in the latter part of 1884, Mr. Herman Naveau, -of Hamilton, obtained some of those.bees from Queensland, and has had great success with them. ITALIAN BEES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA. In South Australia, as Mr. Bonney informs me, the Chamber of Manufactures imported a colony of Italian bees from Mr. Fullwood, of Brisbane, in December, 1883, and succeeded in establishing them on Kangaroo Island, where they are doing remarkably wéll. Mr. Bonney himself has since successfully imported queens direct from Italy, a parcel of twelve from Bologna, to his order, having arrived safely in September, 1884, at Adelaide. ‘He states that “around Adelaide, bee-keeping is now all the rage, very many persons taking it up as an amuse- ment, while « few are making it a means of livelihood.” Much credit is due to this gentleman for the trouble he has taken to place apiculture on a proper footing in South Australia. ITALIAN BEES IN TASMANIA. To Mr. Thos. Lloyd Hood, of Hobart, the gentleman already referred to, belongs the credit of being the first person to introduce Italian bees into Tasmania. They arrived at Hobart from New South Wales in the s.s. Flora, Captain Bennison, on the 4th October, 1884. Mr. Hood, writing in May, 1885, informs me that he has had great success with them. “ Though kept in the city they increased the first season to five strong colonies and two rather weak ones. Most of the young queens are hybrids.” SUITABILITY OF NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA FOR APICULTURE. Any person who had a practical knowledge of apiculture, who had witnessed the results obtained from its improved scientific practice in Europe and America, and who afterwards visited the New-Zealand and ‘Australian colonies, could not fail to be struck with the advantages they offer for the prose- cution of the honey industry. First, as regards BEE MANUAL. 17 CLIMATE. The influence of climate upon the operations of the bee- keeper is of a two-fold nature : first, as it affects the bee itself, especially the condition of the insect during the winter season ; and, secondly, as it is favourable or otherwise to that class of vegetation which affords forage for the bee and a flow of nectar in the honey season. Looking to the old country, we shall find that all those portions of Southern Europe, Asia Minor, and Pheenicia which constitute the ancient home of the honey- bee lie between the isothermal lines of 41° and 59° mean winter temperature, the medium line of 50° passing through or close to all the localities most celebrated both in ancient and modern times for the quality of its honey. The same places lie between the summer isothermals of 68° and 77°. California in North America and Chili in South America, both rich honey-pro- ducing countries, have a mean winter temperature of 50° to 51° and a summer temperature of 67° to 68°. The colony of Victoria in Australia and the province of Auckland in New Zealand have exactly the same mean temperature as these last mentioned countries, both in winter and summer ; and the whole of the New Zealand islands, as well as nearly all the Australian colonies south of Queensland, lie between the lines of 41° and 59° mean winter temperature, exactly as in the case of the most favoured honey countries in the northern hemi- sphere. Queensland and some northern portions of New South Wales and South Australia have a winter temperature several degrees warmer than, and a tropical summer nearly equal to, that of Egypt and Syria. The rainfall in most of these colonies is amply sufficient for a luxuriant vegetation. In the most southern parts of New Zealand and Tasmania bees can fly about and even gather some honey and pollen all through the winter; and in some of the Australian colonies they can even gather surplus honey all the year round. When we remember the trouble, risk, and expense that has to be incurred in wintering bees in many parts of Europe and America, where they have to be confined in cellars for three or even for five or six months of the year in a state of semi or complete torpor, we can appreciate the advantages for the purposes of bee-keeping of a climate such as we enjoy in these colonies. Cc 18 AUSTRALASIAN NATIVE FLORA, This is a matter to be dealt with more fully in the chapter on bee forage; it is only necessary to mention here, in elucidation of this part of our subject, that the indigenous trees are nearly all honey bearers. ‘This is abundantly proved by the amount of honey sometimes taken from colonies wild in the bush. It is quite a frequent occurrence to take from 100 to 200 Ibs. and very often more from these hives. This honey could not, in many cases, have been gathered from any other source than the bush, for as the colonies are sometimes found eight or ten miles from any cultivation, and as the bee does not usually exceed from one mile and a half to two miles’ radius in its flight, it follows that honey obtained from the hives mentioned must have come exclusively from the indigenous flora. If further proof be required, may we not find it in the fact that the bee has so quickly and universally spread over New Zealand and other parts of Australasia from a few colonies ? The apiarist has not only the benefit of a splendid native flora, but the climate being so well adapted for the growth of all honey-producing plants of the old world, he is especially favoured in this country. In Australia the native acacias and eucalypti are especially valuable for bee forage, varying as they do in their times of blossoming, so that some of them are available at almost any season of the year. These trees also grow rapidly and thrive well when introduced into New Zealand. IMPORTANCE OF APICULTURE AS AN INDUSTRY. The degree to which the production of honey may be de- veloped in a comparatively short time will be best illustrated by the case of the United States of America. Professor Cook, in the last edition of his Manual of the Apiary, gives the following picture of the present state of the industry :—“ An excellent authority places the number of colonies of bees in the United States in 1881 at 3,000,000, and the honey production of the year at more than 200,000,000Ibs ; the production for that year was not up to the average, and yet the cash value of the year’s honey crop exceeds thirty millions of dollars.” G. W. Mead and Co., of San Francisco, in their annual review issued BEE MANUAL. 19 afew months ago, state that the total output of California honey, comb and extracted, for 1884, aggregated nearly the enormous total of 9,000,000 Ibs. It has no parallel in any part of the world. These appear to be enormous results, and yet the apiarists of America still speak and act as men convinced that their industry is scarcely out of its infancy as yet, and who see no prospect of a sudden or early check to the progressive increase either of production or consumption. The use of manufactured sugar has now for many generations almost entirely supplanted that of honey, which could not be, under the old system, produced in sufficient quantities or at a sufficiently low cost to compete with the new sweet. But sugar, although so nearly the same in chemical constitution, is not honey, and never can take the place of that delicious product as an agreeable and wholesome addition to the food of man. Modern apiculture, which renders possible an enormously in- creased production of honey at a greatly reduced cost, cannot fail to lead to its general use again, not of course to the ex- clusion of sugar, but upon a scale which would have been quite impossible in former times. PROFITS OF BEE-KEEPING. This is a question with reference to which it is necessary to guard against false or exaggerated views. It must be recollected that all industries require the combination in certain propor- tions of three elements—capital, labour, and skill. Some afford aready and safe investment for the first ; others require an immense quantity of the second; and others again are chiefly dependent upon the exercise of the third. The honey industry especially may be reckoned of the latter sort. An apiary cannot, it is true, be established without a certain expenditure of capital, nor worked without some labour; but both these factors are small as compared with the value of the personal care and attention of the skilled apiarist, upon which the question of profit or loss mainly depends, and the profits of a successful apiary are rarely indeed more than sufficient to fairly remunerate the time and skill so applied. Bee-keeping is therefore not to be looked upon as a profitable investment for large capital, or as a large employer of labour, but as a fair field, and certainly a fairly remunerative one, for the industry, 20 AUSTRALASIAN skill and perseverance of him who lays himself out to be not only a bee-keeper but a bee master. The question is continually asked—‘‘ What is the average yearly production of honey, and what the average profit from each hive?” The answer must be, the former depends practically upon the skill of the apiarist (within certain limits of course), and the latter mainly upon his commercial intelli- gence. It is easy to show what results are attained in some eases, but it is dangerous to apply these results as a measure of success or failure in our own case. Such results as 300, 400, or even 500 Ibs. of extracted honey from one hive in a good season are not unknown nor even very rare. An average of 200 lbs. per hive may be often attained under favourable circumstances and good management ; but 100 lbs. of extracted, or 60 lbs. of comb honey per hive may be nearer to the mark of what a prudent apiarist will look forward to obtaining, and any one who can show such results as the average of a number of successive seasons, may fairly count him- self a successful bee-keeper, and his location a favoured one. It must, however, be understood that it is a rule, with perhaps no exceptions, that the larger the apiary the lower the average production per hive; so that supposing 100 lbs. of extracted honey to be a fair average through an apiary of 100 hives I would consider 75lbs. a good one per hive for 250 hives under the same conditions. ADAPTATION TO WOMEN. There is a feature in this industry which, I think, especially recommends it to notice, viz., its adaptation to women. In both England and America, at the present time, some of the most successful apiarists are ladies, and several of the most extensive bee-keepers in America are assisted by their wives and daughters. Professor Cook states that Mrs. L. B. Baker, of Landsing, Michigan, who has kept bees very successfully for four years, read an admirable paper before the Michigan con- vention of bee-keepers, in which she said :— “But I can say, having tried both (referring to boarding-house- keeping and bee culture), I give bee-keeping the preference, as more profitable, healthful, independent, and enjoyable. I find the labours of the apiary more endurable than working over a stove, and more BEE MANUAL. 21 pleasant and conducive to health. I believe that many of our delicate and invalid ladies would find renewed vigour in body and mind in the labours and recreation of the apiary. My own experience of the apiary is that it is a source of interest and enjoyment far exceeding my anticipations.” Although apiculture offers as good an opening to people of either sex as can be found amongst ordinary industries, I do net mean to say that it is a “royal road” to wealth, or that it is suitable to every person who thinks proper to engage in it; but we have ample proof that it has been the means of many people of both sexes regaining their health and strength, and so enabling them to earn a respectable livelihood when they were almost incapable of undertaking any other employment. One notable instance in this respect I can quote in the person of Mrs. L. Harrison, of Illinois, now one of the most successful lady apiarists and writers on bee matters known. This lady was at one time told by her physician that she could not live ; but, as she herself states, “apiculture did for her what the physicians could not do—restored her to health, and gave her such vigour that she has been able to work a large apiary for years.” ADVICE TO- BEGINNERS. Let me impress upon the minds of those about to embark in the culture of bees the fact that success in this industry, as in all others, can only be obtained by tact, patience, and perseverance. As the Rev. L. L. Langstroth says :—“ There is no royal road to profitable bee-keeping ; and while large profits can be realised by careful and experienced bee-keepers, those who are otherwise will be almost sure to find their outlay result only in vexatious losses. An apiary neglected or mis- managed is worse than a farm overgrown by weeds or exhausted by ignorant tillage ; for the land, by prudent management, may again be made fertile, but the bees when once destroyed are a total loss.” It would be injudicious for an inexperienced person to start with a large number of colonies, not more than four or five, for under modern management these could be increased very rapidly after he had acquired skill and experience. I would recommend beginners to procure good stocks or early swarms to start with, from some reliable person in his immediate neighbourhood if possible. For the sake of economy get black bees, and after 22 AUSTRALASIAN gaining some little experience procure either an Italian queen or a nucleus colony of Italian bees, and Italianise the black stocks, according to directions given in another chapter. By adopting this plan much expense and risk will be saved at the commencement. The beginner should of course adopt all the latest improvements in bee-culture, and, if possible, visit an apiary where the modern system of management has been introduced. Let me also impress on him the necessity and advantage of only having one kind and size of hive throughout the apiary. The reason of this is so obvious that it needs no further comment. Let him also remember that “ practice makes perfect ;” that no matter how fully any book may enter on a given subject, yet without experience the reader, practi- cally, will be like a ship without a rudder, for itis only by practical experience that we gain lasting knowledge and success. He should become a member of the nearest bee-keepers’ asso- ciation and a subscriber to a local bee journal, which will keep him posted up in everything relating to the progress of the industry in these colonies, and serve as a means of communi- cation between him and his fellow bee-keepers. He should follow the simple instructions given in this Manual, and avoid trying new experiments until he feels that he is master of the rudi- ments of the art; he may afterwards with advantage study all that has been written on the subject of apiculture, and form his own judgment on points (not a few) where he finds that “the doctors differ.” STATE AID TO APICULTURE. Germany and other continental states have long felt it to be one of the duties of a paternal government to promote the diffusion of a knowledge of the principles of bee-culture by means of suitable publications and by placing at the disposal of agricultural societies an annual contribution in aid of their objects. The United Sates of America have, at their Agricul- tural Colleges, professors of entomology and of bee-culture, who give both theoretical and practical instruction to the students ; and in England a movement has been for some time in progress, which has now received the sanction of the Education Depart- ment, to place among the “ extra subjects,” the optional study of which is provided for by the Education Act, the branch BEE MANUAL, 23 of “ practical scientific bee-keeping, the natural history of the honey-bee, and the fertilization of tlowers by insects generally.” This is a step which might well be followed by our own Edu- cation Boards. Itis to he hoped that our Colonial Governments will show themselves alive to the importance of encouraging the study of scientific bee-culturé. The industry itself is not one which calls for state aid in the shape of subsidies or of protective duties, and it is therefore all the more deserving of all the indirect assistance which an enlightened Government may find opportunities of extending to it. BEE PUBLICATIONS. The following are some of the best works on modern apiculture :— ‘*LANGSTROTH ON THE Hive anp Honry Bes.”—This work is con- sidered by some to be the best bee book in the English language. I can, from my own knowledge, bear testimony to its excellence and usefulness. “*Coox’s MANUAL OF THE APIARY.”—This is unquestionably a first- class work, and is fully up with the times as far as regards apiculture and the physiology of the honey-bee. “Tue ABC. or Bee-Cutture.”—This work 1s in the form of an Encyclopedia, containing all the latest information relative to this matter, and is both plain and practical. By A. J. Root. ‘*Quinsy’s New Beze-Keerine.”’—This is a very useful work, written by one of America’s most practical bee-keepers. “Kine’s New Bexe-Keepers’ Text Boox.”—A capital work, kept well up with the times. Has had an enormous sale. “Bees anD Honey,” by T. G. Newman.—This is a sprightly little book, well illustrated, and contains a large amount of practical information. “¢ AriEy’s Hanp-Boox.”—‘ New method of queen-rearing,’ by one of the most experienced queen-breeders living. “BuesseD Brees” and ‘“ Puin’s DicrioNaRy oF PracticaL API- CULTURE” are well worthy of a place in every bee-keeper’s library. The foregoing are all American publications ; the following are some by English authors :— ‘¢ Bevan oN THE Honey-BEz.”— This book is especially devoted to the natural history, anatomy, and physiology of the honey-bee, and would be very valuable to the student. ‘Hunter’s Manvau,”—A good work ; specially written for British bee-keepers. 24 AUSTRALASIAN ‘* Tur APIARY, OR Bers, BEE Hives, AND BEE Cutrure,” by Alfred Neighbour.—This is, I believe, the best work now published in England—quite up with the times. “‘Cowan’s British BEE-KEEPERS’ GuIpE Boox.”—Written by a thoroughly practical beekeeper. Cheap, and first-class. PERIODICALS (Weeklies). — ‘‘ AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL,” ‘‘ KANSAS BEEKEEPER,” and ‘‘ CANADIAN BEE JoURNAL.” (Bi-Monthlies)— ‘British Bex JOURNAL,” and “‘GLEANINGS IN BEE CULTURE.” (Monthlies)\—“ AmeRicaAN BEE JoURNAL,” ‘‘ BEEKEEPERS’ Maca- ZINE,” ‘‘AMERICAN APICULTURIST,” THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE,” and ‘“‘New ZEALAND FARMER, BEE AND PouLTRY JOURNAL.” jprxiom. ‘* BEES GORGED WITH HONEY NEVER VOLUNTEER AN ATTACK,” Langstroth. BEE MANUAL. 25 CHAPTER Il. THE HONEY BEE: ITS VARIETIES AND DISTRIBUTION. THERE are many species of the genus Apis, or Bee, but only one which stores honey in such a manner as to be practically useful to man, and which Linnzus distinguished by the name APIS MELLIFICA. The particular variety of this species known to Linnzus was the Black, or German bee. Since the beginning of the present century, other varieties were observed and described by Spinola and others, and were classed at first as distinct species. In the year 1862, Dr. A. Gerstaecker, of Berlin, first published the results of his investigations upon the ‘GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE HONEY-BEE AND ITS VARIETIES,” from which I take the following condensed extracts. He says that up to within some ten years of the time when he was writing, bee-keepers knew only one sort of honey-bee—that which had been reared for ages—the Apis mellifica of Linnzus ; but they then (in 1862) distinguished the German from the Italian bee. The latter had, in fact, been noticed in the beginning of this century, by Spinola and by Latreille, as a separate species of the genus Apis, and was named by the for- mer zoologist, Apis ligustica ; nevertheless it proved to be only a coloured variety of the same species ; the size, as well as the structural peculiarities of the insect, being the same in every respect, and the two sorts admitting of 'cross-breeding to any extent whereas, if they belonged to different species, the off- spring would, in all probability, consist of unprolific hybrids. The knowledge of the practical apiarist was, at all events, then confined to these two varieties of the honey-bee, and they were supposed to be indigenous almost exclusively to Europe, the 26 AUSTRALASIAN northern coast of Africa being their supposed boundary on the south, and the coast of Asia Minor on the east. When Dr. Gerstaecker, however, undertook his investigations, he obtained samples of a large number of varieties mentioned in the works of Fabricius, Latreille, Lepeletier, and others, as being found in various parts of Africa and of Asia, north of the Himalayas, ‘and subjected them to a minute examination, comparatively, with each other, and with the two varieties already known in Europe. He soon satisfied himself beyond all doubt that they were all merely varieties of the one species, the Apis mellifica, differing only in colour and size—all capable of being cross-bred, and of being utilised by the apiarist. He also found that this one species, represented by many different varieties, was spread over a vastly larger area than had been supposed, comprising nearly the whole of Europe (up to 60° or even 64° north lati- tude in some places), the whole continent of Africa, and the whole of Asia Minor, Syria, Persia, and other portions of Asia north of the Himalayan range, up to eastern Siberia and China. Out of the numerous varieties brought under review, six have been selected as being of sufficient importance to be sepa- rately dealt with. These, with their distinguishing marks and the regions to which they seem particularly to belong, are classified and described as follows :— 1. The single coloured, dark, northern, or German bee (Apis mellifica of Linnzeus), found in the whole of north and middle Europe, and also in the south of France, south of Spain, Por- tugal, a few parts of Italy, in Dalmatia, Greece, at the Crimea, and along the coast of Asia Minor, including the adjacent islands. It is also found on the African continent, at Algiers, Guinea, and at the Cape of Good Hope, to which latter place, however, it was probably introduced direct from Europe. As a very slight sub-variety of the same may be noted the Hymettus bee (Apis cecropia), differing only in being slightly smaller and more hairy, often also showing reddish spots on the sides of the second abdominal ring. This bee is found in the south of Spain, as well as in Greece, and even, in some isolated cases, in Germany. 2, The Italian bee (Apis ligustica of Spinola), of equal size with the German bee, but with golden yellow colour on the first three abdominal rings, whilst the back plate (of the BEE MANUAL. 27 thorax) is of a dark colour. It was first noticed by Spinola as being peculiar to all parts of Liguria. Its first or original habitat was difficult to be ascertained in 1862, as during the previous ten years it had been artificially distributed to many new places. Although to be found in various parts of Italy, it is by no means general in that country. Besides the pro- vince of Liguria, the southern slopes of the Tyrolese and Swiss Alps would appear to have been its original home. 3. The Italian bee, with yellow back plate—otherwise of the same size and colour as the last. It is found in southern France, Dalmatia, Banat, at Sicily, and in the Crimea, in the islands and on the coast of Asia Minor, and in the Caucasus, and in many of those places in common, partly with the Italian (No. 2), and partly with the German bee. 4, The Egyptian bee (Apis fasciaca of Latreille). It is nearly one-third smaller than the German or Italian bee, its body coloured like the latter, and the back plate also yellow ; the hair of the chest and body whitish. Its proper habitat is Egypt, Arabia, and Syria, but it is found, with scarcely any observable difference, on the northern slopes of the Himalayas and in China. It was introduced into Germany in 1863, by the Acclimatisation Society of Berlin, and thence into England in 1865. 5. The specific African bee (Apis Adansonii of Latreille) is of the same size and colour as the last, but differs in the greyish- yellow colour of the hair on the chest and body. It is spread over the whole African continent, with the exception of Algiers and Egypt, from Abyssinia and Senegambia to the Cape of Good Hope. 6. The remarkable black Madagascar bee (Apis unicolor of Latreille) is something smaller than the German bee, all dark coloured, and its hairs black. It is confined to Madagascar and the Mauritius. With reference to the countries of the New World, North and South America, and Australasia, Dr. Gerstaecker asserts that in none of them were any species of the genus Apis found until they had been imported from Europe. He gives the dates of importation into Florida, North America, as 1763; thence to Kentucky in 1780, and to New York in 1793; into Brazil, South America, in 1845, Rio Grande in 1853, and to Buenos Ayres (from Chili) in 1852. Into Mexico and central America 28 AUSTRALASIAN generally, the bee appears to have been introduced at an early period by the Spaniards, and probably spread itself thence to the districts of Venezuela, Peru, and Chili, in South America. Its introduction into Australia and New Zealand has been noticed in the preceding chapter. With regard to its first importation into North America, Dr. J. P. H. Brown, an emi- nent American apiarist, in a paper read by him at the National Convention in 1881, says, “The Black or German bee was introduced, it is believed, into Pennsylvania from Germany, about the year 1627.” It certainly appears very probable that William Penn’s followers would have endeavoured to introduce bees from England, if not from Germany, as soon as they began to settle down ‘in their new home; nevertheless it is very likely that in the severe winter climate of Pennsylvania and New York the bees would not spontaneously wander far from the human settlements, and that it was only when they got fairly established in the favourable climate of Florida, as mentioned by Dr. Gerstaecker, that they began to spread themselves westwards in advance of the new settlements. GERMAN, OR BLACK BEE. Fig. 1._BLACK QUEEN, Neither of the names, German or Black, is a correct designa- tion of this variety ; for, as Dr. Gerstaecker has shown, it was by no means confined originally to Germany, and its prevailing colour is more brown than black ; but these are the names by which it is now universally known. BEE MANUAL. 29 This variety has held undisputed sway in the north and west of Europe for a couple of thousand years at least, and has been the pioneer in culling the sweets of all the countries of the New World. Wherever Europeans have colonised, there may be found this little insect. It is now being rapidly super- seded by the Italian race, but it has still some faithful admirers, and in more than one respect it is admitted by all to hold the advantage over its Italian rival. I shall compare its qualities with those of the Italian further on. However we may admit the superior beauty, as well as the more useful qualities, of the new races, we cannot avoid feeling a sort of regret for the extinction of our old favourites. ITALIAN, OR LIGURIAN BEE. Fig. 2,_ITALIAN QUEEN, The Italian bee was evidently known to Aristotle and Virgil. The latter writer refers to it in the following lines :— ‘These gaily bright their radiant scales unfold, Spangled with equal spots, and dropped with gold ” Although known so well to these ancient writers, very little notice appears to have been taken of this variety till quite modern times, when, in the beginning of the present century, the Marquis de Spinola described it as being distinct from the common bee, and gave it the name of “ Ligurian,” after a pro- vince in Northern Italy, where it was first discovered. This district being very mountainous, and the Alps intervening between it and Northern Europe, it is in a manner isolated, which will no doubt account in some measure for so little 30 AUSTRALASIAN having been known of this bee, and, as some think, has helped to develop a distinct variety. It was introduced into Germany in 1853, by Dr. Dzierzon, who, on the twenty-fifth anniversary of its introduction, pub- lished in a German bee paper a very interesting account of it, speaking in very high terms of its superior quality. It was introduced into England in 1859, by Mr. Neighbour, and into America by Messrs. Wagner and Colvin the same year. Wherever it has been introduced, its superiority over the common bee in many respects has been always acknow- ledged. In America it has become so universal, that it is said to be impossible to find a pure black bee in some of the States ; and I have no doubt, now it has become established in Austra- lasia, that, notwithstanding the fears of a few individuals, it will be found to deserve all that has been said regarding its superiority over the black bee. With regard to the many excellent qualities it is said to possess, I will first quote Cook; he being a professor of ento- mology, as well as an apiarist, his opinion should be doubly valuable. He says :— ‘* The Italians certainly possess the following points of superiority :-— ‘1. They possess longer tongues, and so can gather from flowers that are useless to the black bee. How much value hangs upon this structural peculiarity Iam unable to state. I have frequently seen Italians working on red clover. Inever saw a black bee thus employed. It is easy to see that this might be at certain times and seasons a very material aid. How much of the superior storing qualities of the Italians is due to this lengthened ligula, 1 am unable to say. “2. They are more active, and with the same opportunities will collect a good deal more honey. This isa matter of observation, which I have tested over and over again; yet I will give the figures of another. Mr. Doolittle secured from two colonies 309 Ib. and 301 Ib. respectively of box honey during one season. These surprising figures, the best he could give, were from his best Italian stocks. Similar testimony comes from Klien and Dzierzon, over the sea, and from most of our apiarists. ‘3. They work earlier and later. This is not only true of the day, but of the season, On cool days in spring I have seen the dande- lions swarming with Italians, while not a black bee was to be seen. On May 7th, 1877, I walked less than half a mile, and counted sixty- eight bees oe from dandelions, yet only two were black bees, This might be considered an undesirable feature, as tending to spring dwindling ; yet, with proper management, I consider this no objection, but a great ats Ue “4, They are far better to protect their hives against robbers. Rob- bers who attempt to plunder Italians of their hard-earned stores soon BEE MANUAL. 31 find that they have dared to ‘beard the lion in his den.’ This is so patent, that even the advocates of black bees are ready to concede it. “5, They are almost proof against the ravages of the bee moth’s larva. This is almost universally conceded. “¢6. The queens are decidedly more prolific. This is probably in art due to the greater and more constant activity of the workers. his is observable at all seasons, but more especially when building up in the spring. No one who will take the pains tv note the increase of brood will long remain in doubt on this point. ‘7, They are less apt to breed in winter, when it is desirable to have the bees very quiet. This refers to cold climates. *©§. The queen is more readily found, which is a great advantage. In {the various manipulations of the apiary, it is frequently found desirable to find the queen. In full colonies, I would rather find three Italian queens than one black one. Where time is money this becomes a matter of much importance. “<9, The bees are more disposed to adhere to the comb while bein: handled, which some might regard as a doubtful compliment, thoug I consider it a desirable quality. ‘©10. They are, in my judgment, less liable to rob other bees. They will find honey when the blacks ees none, and the time for robbing is when there is no gathering. This may explain the above peculiarity. “11, And, in my estimation, a sufficient ground for preference, did it stand alone, the Italian bees are far more amiable. Years ago I got rid of my black bees because they were so cross. Two years agoI got two or three colonies, that my students might see the difference, but to my regret; for, as we removed the honey in the autumn, they seemed perfectly furious, like demons seeking whom they might devour, and this, too, despite the smoker, while the far more numerous Italians were safely handled without smoke. The experiment at least satisfied a large class of students as to superiority. Mr. Quinby speaks in his book of their being cross, and Captain Hetherington tells me that if not much handled they are more cross than the blacks. From my own experience I cannot understand this. Hybrids are even more cross than the pure blacks, but otherwise are nearly as desirable as the pure Italians. I have kept these two races side by side for years, I have studied them most carefully, and I feel sure that none of the above eleven points of excellence is too strongly stated.” Having now had over four years’ experience of Italian bees, I can fully endorse nearly all that Professor Cook says of them, though I am not convinced as regards his third point. I have often seen black bees out in the morning, when not an Italian was stirring; at other times they were about equal in this respect. Neither can I admit that black bees never work on red clover, as I have frequently myself of late seen them do so. And although it is quite true, and a decided advantage, that Italians and hybrids defend their hives better than black bees 32 AUSTRALASIAN against the attacks of robbers, I cannot acquit them of a pro- pensity to act as robbers themselves. I have found hybrids, at least, as bad as the black bees in this respect. MARKINGS OF PURE ITALIA N BEES. In describing the markings of pure Italian bees, all writers agree that the workers should have three yellow bands on the abdomen. Fig. 8\— ABDOMEN OF ITALIAN WORKER ‘BEE. ABO, Fig. 3, represent the three yellow semi-transparent bands ; D E, and the shaded parts of A B GC, are rows of greyish hairs. A strain of Italian bees having these rows of hair unusually developed have been sold in America under the name of Albinos. Now, with some of the worker bees bred from queens which I have imported direct from Italy, although they have the three bands, the first next to the thorax (A, Fig. 3) is so narrow that it cannot be seen unless closely inspected, while others show all three bands plainly. In a personal con- versation with Mr. Fullwood, of Brisbane, on this subject, he told me he had frequently noticed the same difference in the markings of his imported bees. I mention this the more particularly, because some persons, after reading the description of pure Italian bees in other works, where they are stated to be of a bright colour, with the three yellow bands plainly BEE MANUAL. 33 visible, are apt to think their bees are not pure unless they answer that description. The bees from the queens I imported from America were, as a rule, much lighter and handsomer than those that came direct from Italy, and I account for this by their having been bred for lightness of colour rather than for honey-gathering qualities, though I have no doubt the two objects may be attained in the same bee. It is worthy of note that some of the most experienced bee keepers of America prefer a strain of dark leather-coloured bees to the lighter ones. My own opinion is that the test of purity is uniformity of the markings on the whole of the worker-bees of a colony, whether the three bands be plaiuly visible or not. The lightest coloured and most handsome variety of the Italian bee is to be found in the Swiss-Alpine districts, from which place the most of the English importers now obtain their supplies. HYBRIDS—GERMAN-ITALIAN. Much has been said for and against the cultivation of hybrids. My own experience leads me to believe that, as honey-gatherers and for hardiness, they are far superior to either the German or Italian race pure, but as regards docility they would be nowhere in a comparison. The first cross between an Italian queen and a black drone produces, I believe, the best workers. Should, however, any person prefer a greater degree of gentleness in his bees to a larger production of honey, I would advise him not to keep hybrids longer than he can possibly help. In briefly stating what I consider to be the superior qualities of each sort, Germans, Italians, and hybrids, as compared with each other, I shall first take the Germans, or black bees. Without a doubt, for raising comb-honey they beat both Italians and hybrids. First, they will take to the section boxes sooner than the others; second, they leave a slight air space between the honey and the capping of the cells, which preserves the brightness of the cappings and gives to comb-honey that nice white appearance which is so much admired. On the contrary, the Italians, and in a less degree the hybrids, allow little or no air space, consequently the comb has a dark, damp look, on account of the proximity of the honey to the cappings. Italians are superior to the Germans— D 34 AUSTRALASIAN first, in being better honey-gatherers ; second, in possessing longer tongues; third, in being more prolific; and fourth, in being more gentle, though, if once aroused, I believe them to be as vicious as hybrids. Hybrids I have found best of all for honey-gathering and for hardiness. As to prolificness, I think they are about equal to Italians. To sum up, I would place the three sorts in the following order for the different qualities required :—As honey-gatherers—Hybrids, Italians, Germans ; for gentleness, Italians, Germans, Hybrids ; for prolificness, Italians and Hybrids equal, Germans; for hardiness, Hybrids, Italians and Germans I have seen little difference between ; for protecting their hives against robbers, Italians, Hybrids, Germans ; for comb-honey raising, Germans, Hybrids, Italians. CYPRIAN, SYRIAN, AND PALESTINE BEES. The first of these varieties is a native of the Island of Cyprus. The name “Syrian” is now confined to a race of bees coming from the part of Syria north of the mountain range which extends from the Mediterranean at Mount Carmel eastward to the Jordan, while those coming from the south of that range, although still in Syria, are called “ Palestine” or “ Holy Land” bees. The first two differ very little from each other; they have the yellow bands of the Italian, with which race they are probably nearly related, but have also more or less yellow on the thorax. They are evidently those comprised by Dr. Ger- staecker under one head, No. 3, which he mentions as being found on the coast of Asia Minor and the adjacent islands, as well as in other places. The third sort, or “ Palestine bee,” is as evidently the No. 4, or Egyptian bee of Gerstaecker, which he says inhabits Egypt, Arabia, and Syria. Mr. D. A. Jones, of Ontario, Canada, one of the most ex- tensive and enterprising apiarists in the world, paid a visit to Europe and the Kast in 1879, in search of a superior race of bees, believing that such existed somewhere in those parts. He was accompanied by an experienced entomologist and bee master, Mr. Benton. These gentlemen, after visiting Cyprus, established a queen-rearing apiary there, consisting of about 100 colonies. Mr. Jones also procured some bees from Syria and Palestine ; ‘shortly after which he returned to Canada with a number of these bees, leaving Mr. Benton in charge of the Cyprus apiary. BEE MANUAL. 35 The connection between these gentlemen has since been severed, and Mr. Benton has established apiaries at Beyrout, Syria; Larnaca, Cyprus ; and Munich, Germany, where he at present resides. Opinions are still much divided as to the positive and relative value of the different races of Eastern bees. Mr. Benton, in a circular he is now (July, 1885) issuing, says : “ After five years’ experience I am of opinion that the first rank should be given to Cyprian bees as the best bees, all things considered, yet cultivated.” He gives them credit for all the good qualities of the Italian bees, but in a much greater degree, and with regard to their stinging propensities, which has been the principal objection urged against their general cultivation, he says: “The claim that the Cyprian bees are possessed of such great stinging propensities as to make them nearly unmanageable I have not found well based ; indeed, in common with many others who have carefully tested them, I prefer to manipulate Cyprians rather than Italians, and find that, while getting no more stings from them, I can get on much faster with the work.” Syrian bees Mr. Benton considers nearly equal in every respect to Cyprians. The former vary slightly more in their markings, and are not quite so active as the latter, but in other respects they are about equal. He says, “Syrian bees are never to be confounded with Palestine bees.” Of the latter race he does not speak very assuringly, and remarks, “ Though Palestine bees possess some valuable qualities common to Cyprians and Syrians, still, on account of their bad temper and poor wintering qualities, I cannot recommend them for general introduction.” He concludes that for the experienced—above all, for the professional—beekeeper either of the two sorts, Cyprians or Syrians, is rost to be recommended. For those who suffer much from bee stings, or who “haven't steady enough nerves to manipulate Cyprians or Syrian bees,” the variety most to be recommended is the CARNIOLAN. These bees take their name from the Austrian province of Carniola, a part of the ancient Illyria, to the east of the Carnic Alps, and on the upper part of the river Save, the great 36 AUSTRALASIAN southern tributary of the Danube. Attention was first called to the qualities of this race, as we are informed by the British Bee Journal, by Mr. Edouard Cori, of ‘Bohemia, who calls it the Carniolan or the Ukraine bee. Now the Ukraine is a Russian province on the Dnieper River, more than a thousand miles east of Carniola, with the whole of Hungary, Roumania, etc., lying between. It appears strange, then, that the two names should be connected in this way; but it will be found that Dr. Gerstaecker has described the German bee as being found also at Dalmatia (a little south of Carniola), and at the Crimea (a little south of the Ukraine) ; and it is evident from all accounts that the Carniolan is only a very slight variety of the German bee, although Mr. Benton implies that it is not. A writer in the British Bee Journal describes it so, and says that “ oreat difficulty is experienced in keeping the Carniolan bee pure, from its resemblance to the common black bee, which renders it difficult to distinguish an hybrid of the two.” They are greatly praised for their gentleness and other good qualities. Mr. Benton says they are “the gentlest of bees,” that “their gentleness casts that of the gentlest Italians all in the shade ;” that they are even more prolific than the Italians, and are equal to them in honey-gatheriny qualities and in sticking to their combs and defending their hives (when not queenless) ; while they ‘are equal to the black bees in comb-building, disposition to enter boxes,” etc. Their faults are, considerable disposition to swarm, the same tendency to rob which the black bees show, and that, when queenless, they do not defend their hives as well as the other Eastern bees. Mr. Marshall, the manager of Mr. Neighbour’s apiary, says he prefers them to Ligurians, that— ‘“‘They are hardier, and therefore more suitable to our changeable climate. They breed as quickly, are very quiet, and a practised bee- keeper can handle them without smoke or veil, and he very rarely gets asting. Some of our bee-masters give them the character of bein much given to swarming, but I have not found them more disposed than Ligurians or blacks in that respect. If you want a business bee, get a good English queen mated with a Carniolan drone ; the combi- nation of the two races makes a really useful bee. They are the silver bees, as the Ligurians are called the golden bees.” The description of this bee given by a writer in the British Bee Journal is as follows :— “In outward appearance the Carniolan bee is slightly larger than BEE MANUAL. 37 the Italian, and not so slender in shape. It is, in fact, a larger bee— probaly the largest domesticated bee. The entire body is of a rich ark brown, almost approaching to black. The golden rings of the Italian are wanting, but each rim of the abdomen is clearly marked by whitish-grey hairs, which render it distinct from any other known race ; and these hairs being longer and brighter than those of the Italian, give the bee ahilvary: butik appearance which is very pleasing to the eye. . . . The Carniolan queen is a larger bee, broader in the thorax, and especially in the upper part of (he abdomen, than the Italian or black queen.” HERZEGOVIAN, DALMATIAN, ROUMELIAN, AND HYMETTUS BEES Mr. Benton has lately introduced queens under these four names. The three first mentioned would seem to be, like the Cyprians and Syrians, only slight varieties of the sort comprised by Gerstaecker under head No. 3. The Hymettus bee is, how- ever, specially mentioned by him as a slight variety of the German or black bee, and already known by the name of Apis cecropia. This bee has, at all events, the advantage of a classic reputation. Gibbon mentions, on the authority of Geoponica, that ‘‘the ancients, or at least the Athenians, believed that all the bees in the world had been propagated from Mount Hy- mettus.” The qualities of all these four varieties (if they are such) have yet to be tried. Mr. Benton wrote of them in November, 1883— ‘Of the four races mentioned last, I have only tried practically the Hymettus, or Greek bees (also called Cecropian or Attic bees). They are prolific, good honey-gatherers, quite cross, but can be managed with plenty of smoke. Herzegovian and Dalmatian bees I know by reputation, and am thus safe in calling them superior to common bees and to Italians. Of Roumelian bees I know nothing ; but as I have an opportunity to get some of them next spring, and having reason to hope they may have good qualities, I shall try them.” OTHER RACES OF BEES. There are three sorts of bees mentioned by Dr. Gerstaecker as being “indigenous to India and the adjacent islands,” Apis dorsata, A. indica, and A. sirialis of Fabricius ; all, no doubt, being varieties of the 4. mellifica. The Indian Government lately published the results of some inquiries they had insti- tuted concerning the “ popular treatment of bees in India,” from which it would appear that there are plenty of bees and 38 AUSTRALASIAN honey in the hilly districts both in the north and south of India. Mr. Morgan, Deputy Conservator of Forests, reports that “only one kind of bee, the Apis indica, is capable of domestication, and that only in hilly districts, not in the plains.” The larger sort of bees, which they call “large cliff bees ” (building in cliffs, under projecting ledges of rock) are represented as so ferocious in habit, and furnished with such formidable stings, as to be dangerous to both men and beasts coming within their neighbourhood. A circumstantial account of a bad case of stinging by these bees appeared in a recent issue of the American Bee Journal, taken from the London Lancet, which called forth the following editorial remarks : “We do not think we want any of these bees in America. The Cyprians are bad enough; but for these bees of India (Apis indica), as well as their more irascible cousins (Apis dorsata), we have no use. Let them stay where they are.” Mr. John Douglas, of the Indian Telegraph Department, says, ‘A swarm of these bees has been known to put a regiment of cavalry to flight, and innumerable are the instances in which man and beast have fallen victims to their unrelenting animosity;” yet he proposes the domestication of this “ great tiger honey fly” (as it is called in parts of the country) as the “first question for Indian apiculturists !” Mr. Benton has been making efforts to import the Apis dorsata from Ceylon; but if they are not very different in disposition from the Apis indica, we in Aus- tralasia may echo the words of the American Bee Journal, “ Let them stay where they are!” NATIVE BEES OF NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA. Notwithstanding the assertion of Dr. Gerstaecker, there are indigenous bees both in New Zealand and Australia. The small bees indigenous to New Zealand, I believe, belong to the species Apis tregona. It makes its nest in the ground, by boring a small hole from the surface, about two inches in depth; holes then branch off in different directions : these branch holes ex- tend two or three inches, and at the bottom of each is deposited a mixture of honey and pollen, in which the eggs are laid. I dug up several nests last season, and found brood in different stages, but there only appeared to have been one ege deposited in each compartment. It is of no service to the apiarist. BEE MANUAL. 39 Mr. F. A. Joyner, of North Adelaide, 8. A., at the suggestion of Mr. Bonney, very kindly sent me lately some specimens of native bees, accompanied by the following remarks :— “‘T have observed them pretty closely for some time past, and find that they gather honey and pollen, are very swift in their movements, have particularly long stings and proboscis, and as late as last evening (April 16th, 1885), for the first time discovered that they exist in swarms, I was unfortunately unable to take the swarm, as the bees were disturbed before I reached them, and I was afterwards unable to find their new alighting place. It appeared an average-sized swarm, and moved similarly to our black bees, with the exception of moving much swifter.”” : I submitted the bees, which had been very much broken to Mr. T. J. Mulvany, for microscopical examination, and’he very kindly supplied me with the following information con- cerning their structure :— “The rings on the abdomen, which are alternately black and silver- grey, are very handsome, and the three ‘subcostal cells’ in the front wings, as well as the hooklets in the under wings, beautifully deve- loped. The wings, compared with those of a common bee, measure as 16 to 19, and as 11 to 13, which shows them to be 0°84 of the length; from this, and from appearance of head, legs, and abdomen, I take the live insect to be more than four-fifths of the size of the black bee and therefore larger than the Egyptian or the Palestine bee. The hind legs have the pollen basket and the long hairs on the ‘basal tar- sus,’ the front legs the peculiar spur at the knee joints, and both have a coating of silver-white hair on the outer side of the ‘tibia.’ The head is very handsome ; the compound eyes wide apart, with golden hairy forehead between. The mouth organs appear to me to be re- markable ; the mandibles are horny, with sharp double points like teeth. I should think this bee could bite as well as sting. The max- ille are also stiff, and, at least in the dry state, look like the beak of a bird. Icould also see the ‘labial palpi,’ but not the tongue itself. Altogether, to my unpractised eye, it looks more like a variety of the Apis mellifica than a different species. It would be very desirable to get some more specimens in a better state of preservation, and, if pos- sible, to take a swarm and try them in a hive.” From what I have heard of the wild or native bees in other parts of Australia, I take them all to be the same as those described. 40 AUSTRALASIAN CHAPTER ILI, INMATES OF THE HIVE--THEIR NATURAL HISTORY. THE honey-bee is, above all things, gregarious in its habits. As Langstroth remarks, “It can flourish only when associated in large numbers as a colony. In’a solitary state a single bee is almost as helpless as a new-born child, being paralysed by the chill of a cold summer's night.” This is true; but it is not alone for the sake of mutual warmth that bees aggregate ; their nature compels them to form a sort of republic (or, if rather a monarchy, then certainly a very limited one), which presents the peculiar feature that all the active citizens are, as we shall see further on, females, who are doomed to a life of celibacy as well as of toil, while the head of the community is, in the strictest sense of the word, the mother of her whole people; and although they support, for a time, a “pampered aris- tocracy ” of idle males, they use very little ceremony in getting rid of them as soon as there appears to be no further chance of their presence being required. GENERAL DESCRIPTION. Every hive in a normal working condition, during the swarm- ing season, will be found to contain bees of the three different kinds, the characteristics and relative sizes of which are shown in the illustrations which follow. First, one bee only of the peculiar form which denotes the queen or mother bee ; secondly, a few hundreds (sometimes more than a thousand) of large bees, called drones ; and thirdly, many thousands of the smaller kind, called workers, which are the common bees to be seen on blossoms, as neither the queen bee nor the drones gather honey or work outside the hive. BEE MANUAL. 41 The queen is indispensable to the prosperity of the hive. She is the only perfectly developed female, and lays all the eggs, of which she can, on occasions, produce two to three thousand in twenty-four hours. Without her the colony would soon dwindle down and die out, or be attacked and killed for the sake of its stores, as, after being deprived of their queen, the workers generally (unless they are in a position to rear a new one, as will be seen further on) lose the disposition to defend themselves and their home. The queen is not provided with the special organisation which enables the workers to gather honey and pollen and to secrete wax. She is furnished with a sting, which, however, she very rarely uses, except in a struggle with arival queen. When she has been once impreg- nated, and has taken her place in a hive, she never leaves it except to accompany a swarm. Her term of life may extend Fig. 4.--THE QUEEN, to four years at least, and during that time she may lay many hundreds of thousands of eggs; but she is considered to be in her prime in the second year, and is seldom very prolific after the third. She can be easily distinguished from the other bees, and be recognised even by the most inexperienced from the following description :—Her body is not so bulky as that of a drone, though longer; it is considerably more tapering than that of either drone or worker; her wings are much shorter in proportion than those of the other bees; the under part of her body is of a lighter and the upper of a darker colour than the worker’s; her movements are 49 AUSTRALASIAN generally slow and matronly, and indeed she looks every inch a queen. The drones, or male bees, are much stouter than’ either the queen or workers, although their bodies are not so long as that of the queen. They are neither furnished with a sting nor a suitable proboscis for gathering honey, no baskets on their legs for carrying pollen, and no pouches on their Fig 5.,-THE DRONE, abdomens for secreting wax, so that they are physically incapable of doing the ordinary work of the hive. Their office is to impregnate the young queens, but very few have the chance of doing so; those that have, die immediately afterwards, and the rest are usually destroyed by the workers at the end of the swarming season, having by this time become an incumbrance only. i Fig. 6THE WORKER. The worker bees, the smallest in size, constitute the bulk of the population of the hive. A good-sized swarm should contain at least twenty thousand,* and a well-stocked hive, during the * About 4000 ordinary bees weigh one pound, so that a 5 lb. swarm contains about 20,000. Good swarms, however, sometimes weigh 7 lb. to 10 lb. BEE MANUAL. 43 full working season, will have twice, and sometimes three times, that number of workers. ‘They are all females, but not fully developed as regards their sexual organization—they are incapa- ble of being impregnated by the drones ; but in some rare cases their ovaries are sufficiently developed to admit of their laying eggs, which, however, as will be shown later, are unfertilised, and produce only drones. On the other hand, these workers are specially provided with the means of successfully prosecut- ing their useful labours. They have a wonderfully constructed tongue, or proboscis, which enables them to suck or lap up the liquid sweet from the nectaries of blossoms, and to store it in a “honey sac,” which is, in fact, a first or extra stomach, from which they can again disgorge it at will into the cells of their combs. Their hinder legs are provided with a hollow, or “basket,” for carrying pollen, which they are enabled, by the use of their front legs and their proboscis, to work up into little pellets, and pack in these receptacles. They have the power of secreting wax in small scales under the folds of the abdominal rings of their body, and they are furnished with a sting to protect themselves and their stores, and of which they make effective use when provoked. They perform all the work both inside and outside the hive; collect the materials for honey, beebread, and propolis; carry water, secrete the wax, build the combs, nurse and feed the young brood, ventilate the hive, and stand guard at the entrance when it is necessary to keep out intruders. Although division of labour is beautifully exemplified in the economy of the hive, still there are not separate classes of worker bees (as was at one time supposed) to perform the different sorts of work; on the contrary, every worker bee is capable of doing all these things, and they take their turns accordingly. “ One dce in her time plays many parts.” The young bees are employed on “home duty” for the first week or two; they then take their turn of outdoor work, and are gradually worn out in the service. Their term of life is short, varying from only six or seven weeks in the busiest working season to nearly as many months after that busy time is past. PHYSIOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF THE HONEY-BEE. T shall now devote some space in the endeavour to place before the reader, as concisely as practicable, and with the 44 AUSTRALASIAN aid of illustrations, a clear view of the more important facts relating to the physical structure and functional peculiarities of these wonderful insects. For the present advanced state of our knowledge on these points we are mainly indebted to the investigations of Huber and Dzierzon, which have been successfully followed up by the skilful dissections and micro- scopic examinations more recently made by Professor Cook in America, and by Mr. F. R. Cheshire in England. A familiar acquaintance with these facts may be said to be indispensable to all earnest apiarists, not only because the system of modern scientific bee-keeping is based upon the knowledge so obtained, but also because the close observation of the habits of the bee, and of the operations performed in the hive, which constitute the great charm of the bee-keeper’s occupation, can only be really effective and satisfactory when guided by the light of those brilliant discoveries. A writer upon the fine arts, when pointing out the necessity of a knowledge of anatomy to the draughtsman of the human form, has remarked that ‘“ no one can see things as they are, unless he knows how they ought to be.” This is perfectly true with all of us in our observation of the works of nature. As long as we are uninstructed, we “have eyes and cannot see.” The bee-keeper who shall have acquired some knowledge of the physiological peculiarities of the honey-bee, and its “relation to flowers,” will ever after- wards view its every movement and all the phenomena of the hive with new eyes; he will take an entirely new interest in the various structural features of the honey-bearing plants and their blossoms ; he will have obtained at least some inkling of the Divine intention in these varieties of form, and in the simple act of watching a bee’s visit to a flower, he will perceive, what would otherwise have escaped his notice, how beautifully in the different cases the instinct of the insect and the structure of the flower combine to attain the object of the former—the collection of the nectar and the pollen—and the intended beneficial effect upon the latter—its cross fertilization. CLASSIFICATION OF SPECIES. All the different races of the honey-bee with which we are as yet well acquainted are (as mentioned in Chapter IT.) only varieties of the one species, the Apis mellifica ; that is to say, BEE MANUAL. 45 they differ only in size, colour, and perhaps in the greater or less development of some organs; but none of them present any marked distinction in structure or in habits ; they therefore admit of cross-breeding, producing fertile crosses or hybrids which may be continued as a new variety, or re-crossed with other varieties. This would not be the case if they belonged to different species. They belong further to the genus Apis, the family Apide, the order Hymenoptera, sub-class Heaapoda, and class Insecta. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURE. As characteristic of their class and sub-class, the body of these insects is divided into three parts—the head, the thorax, and the abdomen, which are connected by small and hollow ligaments; they have six legs, attached to the thorax, and they breathe air through a system of tubes to be described further on. As belonging to the order Hymenoptera, they have four membranous wings attached to the thorax, of which the two foremost cover the hinder ones when at rest; also a proboscis or tongue by which they can suck or lap, and strong jaws for biting. The family Apide, according to Professor Cook, *‘Includes not only the hive-bee but all insects which feed their helpless young or larve entirely on pollen, or honey and pollen. The larve of all insects of this family are maggot-like—wrinkled, foot- less, tapering at both ends. . . . They are helpless, and thus, all during their babyhood—the larve state—the time when all insects are most ravenous, and the only time when many insects take food, the time when all growth in size, except such enlargement as is required by egg-development occurs, these infant bees have to be fed by their mothers or elder sisters. They have a mouth with soft lips and weak jaws, yet it is doubtful if all or much of their food is taken in at that opening. There is some reason to believe that they, like many maggots, such as the Hessian fly larve, absorb much of their food through the body walls. From the mouth leads the intestine, which has no anal opening, so there are no excreta other than gas and vapour. What commendation for their food, ald capable of nourish- ment, and thus all assimilated ! ” The genus Apis, to which the species 4. meilifica belongs, is characterised chiefly by slight peculiarities in the legs and wings. All bees of this genus have no tibial spurs (stiff spines 46 AUSTRALASIAN at the end of the tibia or long joint of the Jeg) on their posterior legs, and as to their wings, “they have three cubital or sub- costal cells—the second row from the costal or anterior edge— on the front or primary wings.” Here we cannot help remarking how wonderful are those minute rules of organic structure. Who that examined for the first time the wing of a bee, and compared it with that of any other insect of the same order, would imagine that the differences in the sub- divisions of the membrane, which have all the appearances of chance formation, and which are probably not precisely the same in any two examples, are yet so characteristic in their arrangement as to afford an easy means of distinguishing the Fig. 7._WINGS OF A BEE, genus to which the insect belongs! Professor Cook gives the following further details as marks of this whole genus :— “Qn the inner side of the posterior basal tarsus, opposite the pollen baskets, in the neuters or workers, are rows of hair (Fig. 15) which are probably used in collecting pollen. In the males, which do no work except to fertilise the queens, the large compound eyes meet above, crowding the three simple eyes below, while in the workers and queens the simple eyes, called ocelli, are above, and the compound eyes wide apart. The drones and queens have weak jaws, with a rudimentary tooth, short tongues, sal no pollen baskets, though they have the broad tibia and wide basal tarsus.” NERVOUS SYSTEM. Coming now to the special anatomy and physiology of the Apis mellifica, it may be well, in the first place, to show the general arrangement of the nervous system as depicted by Mr. F. R. Cheshire in his admirable “‘ Diagrams on the Anatomy and BEE MANUAL. 47 Physiology of the Honey-Bee,” of which I shall present a few examples for the benefit of the reader, as an incentive to a more thorough study of the whole subject. This illustration speaks for itself, the black spots representing the ganglia or nerve-centres, from which issue the minor systems of nerves appropriated to particular uses, ‘‘ the great masses positioning NG Fig, 8.—NERVOUS SYSTEM OF THE BEE, themselves,” as expressed by Mr. Cheshire, “at the roots of the wings and articulations of the legs, to supply stimulus to the organs of locomotion. The ganglia energising the compound eyes are also large.” 48 AUSTRALASIAN RESPIRATORY ORGANS. It has been already mentioned, as one of the main charac- teristics of the class Jnsecta, that they breathe air through a peculiar system of tubes. These tubes are called trachea, and are of a very beautiful formation. They are thus illustrated and described by Mr. Cheshire :— Fig. 9 TRACHEA, MAGNIFIED. b. Elastic Spiral of Trachea. “The tubes consist of two membranes, between which lies the elastic spiral thread, which prevents the closing of the tube through movement. In the same intervening space the fluids of the insect become aerated, so that the purpose of the lungs of the higher animals is answered.” The outer openings of these tubes, in the sides of the insect, are called spiracles. The bee has fourteen of these spiracles, two on each side of the thorax, and five on each side of the abdomen. The trachea expand into large lung-like sacs in the abdomen of the bee, as shown in the following illustration, where a represents one of the air sacs, b b b the spiracles, and c ¢ some of the trachea. BEE MANUAL. 49 In this engraving details of only one side are shown, and only one air sac on that side. Fig. 10.—RESPIRATORY ORGANS OF THE BEE, AIR SACS OF BEE. There are however, in the worker bee, two sacs on each side a large and a small one; and, what is very remarkable, the larger sac is in fact the undeveloped ovary of the insect, and in the queen bee is replaced by the ovary proper, so that she possesses only one small air sac on each side. The large air sac of the worker is only distended during the time of flight, and we may notice in this substitution of a valuable auxiliary to the flight and carrying power of the worker bee, in place of an organ not required by her, a beautiful adaptation of means to the end. The queen we know is not required to fly far or often, and then not to carry any loads of honey or pollen—indeed it is a well-known fact that she cannot fly far, when her ovaries are filled with eggs, and the smaller air sacs therefore are sufficient for her purpose. The following diagrams show (in Fig. 12) the arrangement of the large and small air E 50 AUSTRALASIAN sacs in the case of the worker, and it will be seen at a glance that they take the places of the smaller air sacs a, and of the ovary 0, in the case of the queen (Fig. 11). Fig. 11,- AIR SACS AND OVARIES Fig, 12,—AIR SAOS OF THE OF QUEEN, WORKER, a, Air sack ; b. Ovary. Every person accustomed to bees must frequently have observed that some of the workers, when returning from the field, remain for some time on the alighting-board before entering the hive, and that during that time the rings of the abdomen are in constant motion. These bees are simply breathing themselves after along and tiresome flight. Mr. Cheshire remarks :— “The constant elongation and contraction of the abdomen of the bee’s body has for its object the ejection of air which has become car- bonised and the drawing in of fresh supplies. The spiracles admit of being closed voluntarily. When the bee is in flight with the air sacs filled, if the spiracle be closed and the abdomen contracted, the faces are extruded. This explains why bees never soil their hives, except BEE MANUAL. 51 when in a dysenteric condition, and why mating only occurs on the wing.” From this sketch of the general features of the bee’s struc- ture I shall now proceed to notice the separate parts more particularly appertaining to the Apis mellifica, commencing wit THE HEAD. Within the small limits of a bee’s head there are contained several important organs, some of them of a very complex nature. These are—the compound eyes; the simple eyes, or stemmata; the mouth and its appendages ; and the antenne. The following engraving shows a front view (on a greatly magnified scale) of a worker bee’s head :— Fig. 13,_HEAD OF WORKER BEE. a, Antenne; b. Compound eyes; c. Jaws; d. Mazille; e. Lateral palpi ; f. Ligula, or tongue ; g. Stemmata. 52 AUSTRALASIAN THE EYES. In this illustration the compound eyes are shown on the right and left hand side, at b 6, and the simple eyes between, on the top of the forehead, in a triangular position, at g. In the drone the compound eyes meet together at top, and the simple eyes are forced down to near the middle of the fore- head. The compound eyes occupy a great portion of the head ; they form on each side an oval lube, convexly rounded, with a brown, horny surface, which is divided into an immense number of hexagonal facets, looking, when magnified, very like a honeycomb, and each of which facets is in fact the surface of a separate eye. There are supposed to be about 3,500 in each compound eye of a bee. These are immovable, and each has a very limited range of vision, but from the way in which they are placed the bee must be able to see with them in a great range without turning its head. These eyes are not supposed to be capable of adjustment for different distances, but to be chiefly useful for distant vision, while the small simple eyes, or stemmata, in front of the head, are most probably intended for seeing objects near at hand. Our knowledge about the bee’s sense of vision, as well as its other senses of hearing, taste, and smelling, is still very imperfect. Sir John Lubbock, after making very careful experiments, is clearly of opinion that bees can distinguish different colours easily, and that they have a partiality for blue. It has been frequently remarked that they seem to discern objects better at a great distance than when near at hand. They fly homewards from any distant point in very direct lines, apparently guided by remote land- marks, but they frequently knock against persons or things, as if they had not perceived them at a little distance ; and if they happen to alight ever so little to one side of the entrance to their hive, they are just as likely to go to the wrong side as to the right one in looking for it. THE MOUTH. The mouth consists of an upper lip (Zabrum) and under lip (labium), and of two pairs of jaws, the upper pair short and horny, called the mandibles, shown atc in the figure, and the lower pair long and more membranous, called the maxilla, and BEE MANUAL. 53 shown at dd. The under-lip, or labium (not seen in the figure) has a broad base, called the mentum, which forms the floor of the mouth, and at the same time the root of the tongue, or ligula, f, and of the labial palpi, ¢e. The ligula itself is some- times called a proboscis, a name which is, in most minds, asso- ciated with the trunk of the elephant, which is a hollow tubular prolongation of the nasal organ. This is no ways analogous with the proboscis of insects in general, and of the honey-bee in particular; the latter is a prolongation of the labium, as above mentioned, which organ is capable of being pushed forward and drawn back into the under cavity of the head, carrying the ligula of course with it. The labial palpi, together with the maxille, appear to be brought into use to assist the ligula, or tongue, in conveying nectar from the flowers to the honey sac of the bee. The end of the tongue is furnished with a spoon- shaped hollow on the under side, which opens into a capillary tube on the upper side, covered with whorls of hair, as is also the end of the ligula. When the bee is sipping, the liquid enters the capillary tube, and the tongue is drawn back by muscles at the base into what Herman Muller terms a suctorial apparatus formed by the labial palpi and maxille. In his valuable work on “ The Fertilisation uf Flowers,” he beauti-. fully describes the above process as follows :— ** When the bee is sucking honey which is only just within her reach, all the movable joints of its suction apparatus, cardines, the chitinous retractors at the base of the mentum, laminz (maxill), labial palpi, and tongue, are fully extended, except that the two proximal Joints of the labial palpi are closely applied to the tongue below, and the laminz to the mentum and hinder part of the tongue above. But as soon as the whorls of hair at the point of the tongue are wet with honey, the bees, by rotating the retractors, draw back the mentum, and with it the tongue, so far that the laminz now reach as far for- ward as the labial palpi; and now labial palpi and lamine together, lying close upon the tongue, and overlapping at their sides, form a tube, out of which only a part of the tongue protrudes. But almost simultaneously with these movements, the bee draws back the basal part of its tongue into the hollow end of the mentum, and so draws the tip of the tongue, moist with honey, into the tube, where the honey is sucked in by an enlargement of the foregut, known as the sucking stomach, whose action is signified externally by a swelling of the abdomen.” Doubts have been expressed as to whether the bee empties the contents of its honey sac into the cells through its proboscis 54 AUSTRALASIAN or simply through its mouth; but the statement of Muller, that when gathering pollen from some kinds of flowers the bee ejects a little honey on the anthers through its suction tube— which in another part of his work he calls the “ proboscis” for shortness—would incline us to suppose that the honey may be ejected into the cells in the same manner. The maxille, or so-called lower jaws, form the under sheath of the ligula and palpi when at rest, and the whole organ is then folded under the lower part of the head. THE ANTENNZ. The antenne, or “feelers,” as they are commonly and not inappropriately called, are very sensitive organs of touch-sen- sations, and, beyond all donbt, of vital importance to the insect. Huber tried experiments with queens deprived of the antenne, and found that the loss of one was not very injurious ; but when both were gone, the bee became apparently delirious, avoided the worker bees, dropped her eggs at random about the hive, and rushed towards the opening, as if to escape. Having introduced a second queen, similarly mutilated, it was found that they had both lost their natural instinct for a com- bat, and met several times without exhibiting the smallest resentment. The worker bees did not seem to distinguish their own mutilated queen from the strange one, and both were left to do as they liked ; but when Huber introduced a third unmutilated queen, the workers seized her, bit her, and confined her so closely that she could hardly move. When he removed this last and one of the others, and left one fertile but muti- lated queen in charge of the hive, she left it, and tried to fly away, but being unable, she fell and died on the ground. Mr. Harris mentions also that worker bees, if deprived of the antenne, and allowed to fly, become incapable of recognising their own hive again, and are hopelessly lost as to their where- abouts. Huber tried other experiments hy dividing the bees of one stock by two fine wire gratings placed so far apart that the antennz of the bees on each side could not meet, and after- wards removing one of the gratings, so that they could touch each other ; and from the results of these experiments he drew the conclusion that they could actually communicate intelligence to each other by means of their autenne. There is, at all BEE MANUAL. 55 events, much yet to be learned with regard to the tiue nature of these organs. SENSES OF HEARING AND SMELLING, Closely connected with the conjectures as to the uses of the antenne are those which many naturalists have made as to the organs of hearing and smelling in the honey-bee. That they are possessed of a keen sense of smell, as well as of taste is indisputable ; and that they are capable of hearing seems very probable, though still doubtful ; but through what organ these senses may be worked upon is only matter of conjecture. Huber suggested that the antenne might be organs of smell as well as touch ; Leltmann and Cuvier considered that the spiracles used for the purposes of respiration were also the means by which the sense of smell was exercised; while Kirby and Spence incline to the belief that the organ lies somewhere in or near the mouth. We can only assert with certainty that bees have a very keen sense of smell, that they are attracted by the odour of flowers, honey, ete., and rendered furious by disagreeable odours, especially by the smell of their own sting-poison. As to their sense of hearing, it seems hard to believe that they are unconscious of such sounds as their own humming, so varied according to circumstances, or to the calls so distinctly made by young queens, and which appear to us to exercise such an influence on their conduct; still it is true that Sir J. Lubbock, who has tried so many experiments on the hearing of bees, with musical instruments, dog whistles, shrill pipes, etc., seems to have satisfied himself that no noise he could make, either harmonious or discordant, was capable of making any impression on them, or of disturbing them in the least. THE WINGS. It has been already stated that the honey-bee, like all insects of the order Hymenoptera, is provided with four membranous wings, springing from the thorax, of which the foremost, or primary wings, slide over and cover the hinder ones when at rest. This arrangement is of importance, as enabling the bee to enter without difficulty the narrow cells of the comb in order to stow honey and bee-bread, to feed the larve, etc., as well as to 56 AUSTRALASIAN work its way into the small corolla-tubes of some flowers and so reach the nectaries at bottom. A pair of these wings has been shown in Fig. 7 to illustrate the arrangement of the cells or subdivisions of the membrane, upon referring to which it will be seen that the two wings, fully expanded, look asif they were stitched together for a certain length. This apparent stitching is a line of about twenty hooklets upon the front edge of the under wing, of which a greatly magnified view is given below :— Fig. 14,—HOOKLETS OF WINGS. Nine of the hooklets are shown in the lower diagram, while the upper one shows, on a still larger scale, the last hooklet of the row, and a line of strong bristly hairs, which furnishes the margin of the wing where the hooklets cease. Mr. Cheshire explains that “These four wings, though individually small, collectively présent sufficient surface for a rapid flight, which is greatly aided by a beautiful arrangement for locking the two pairs into one. The front wing is folded under at its posterior edge, and as the wing is advanced to bring it into position for flying this fold catches into a line of hooks from twenty to twenty-three in number, which turn upwards from the front edge of the back wing.” Can anything more admirable than this arrangement be imagined ? THE LEGS. The legs, six in number, spring, like the wings, from the thorax, which is the chief seat of muscular power. It is, indeed, one mass of muscles, with the exception of the narrow BEE MANUAL. 57 passage of the oesophagus or gullet connecting the mouth with the honey sac and stomach. Lach leg has four principal joints, the coxa, trochanter, femur, and tibia, and five smaller joints, called tarsi, terminating in a two-hooked claw. The coxa and trochanter are short and broad joints, the former working with a ball and socket movement in the so-called coxal cavity in the body ring; the femur represents the thigh, the tibia the leg, and the tarsi the foot joints of the higher animals. In the honey-bee the first of the tarsi is nearly as large as the tibia, to which it is attached ; it is called the basal tarsus, and in the posterior legs of the worker bee it and the tibia are widened out and hollowed on the under side so as to form the “pollen basket” already mentioned at page 42, and as shown in the following engraving :— Fig. 15,-HIND LEG OF BEE, SHOWING POLLEN BASKET, The front legs of the workers have also a very peculiar formation, shown in the next engraving. Under what may be termed the knee joint there is a cavity, c, in the tibia, and a spur or finger, 6, on the femur joint, which can be pressed over the cavity or opened at the will of the bee. Most modern Writers* describe this apparatus as performing an important part in the gathering of pollen, as follows :— When a bee is about to transfer the pollen she has gathered to her pollen baskets, she places her tongue in the cavities of both legs, closes the blades, and then withdraws it, leaving the pollen adhering to the sides of her knees. It is then worked * Especially Mr. A. I. Root, in his ‘‘A BC of Bee Culture ” it is not men- tioned by Langstroth or Quinby. 58 AUSTRALASIAN up into a small pellet by her tongue and feet, and placed by the second pair in the spoon-shaped hollows, or baskets, on the third or last pair of legs, and neatly patted down. Fig. 16.—ANTERIOR LEG OF WORKER, MAGNIFIED. It must, however, be observed that Professor Cook, one of the best authorities, writes very cautiously on this point. He says :— : “‘ For several years this has caused speculation among my students, and has attracted the attention of observing apiarists. Some have supposed that it aided bees ii reaching deeper down into tubular flowers ; others, that it was used in scraping off pollen, and still others, that it enabled bees to hold on when clustering. The first two suggestions may be correct, though other honey and pollen-gathering bees do not possess it. The latter function is performed by the claws at the end of the tarsi.” This throws a doubt upon the matter, and we must be cautious not to assert asa fact anything that is not already universally admitted to be such, or that we cannot decisively prove by our own investigation. I have often watched bees gathering pollen, and thought I could observe the process of scraping the tongue, or something very like it. But it must be admitted that the movements of the bee on such occasions are so amazingly rapid that it would be difficult to say there could be no mistake as to the operation performed. Muller says :— “In collecting pollen, hive-bees and humble-bees use ~ their mouth-parts in two different ways to moisten it, according as it is the fixed pollen of entomophilous flowers, or the loose, easily- scattered pollen of anemophilous flowers. In the former case (e.g., when Apis mellifica collects pollen on Salix) the bee has its suctonal apparatus completely folded down, bringing the mouth opening, which lies between the mandibles and the labrum, close over the pollen. The bee ejects a little honey on the pollen, and then takes it up by means of its tarsal brushes and places it in the baskets on the tibie of its BEE MANUAL. 59 hind legs ; it often makes use of its mandibles to free the pollen before moistening it with honey. In the latter case, which I have observed in Plantago lanceolata . . . the bee, hovering over the flower, ejects a little honey upon the anthers from its suction-tube which is fully extended, but completely sheaths the tongue. . . . Since hive-bees and humble-bees on entomophilous flowers suck honey with outstretched proboscis, and collect pollen with it folded up, and on anemophilous flowers collect pollen only, it follows that they can never suck honey and gather pollen simultaneously ; they must always do first one and then the other, and since the pollen has to be moistened with honey, the act of sucking must always be first.” THE HONEY SAC. This is merely a widening of the cesophagus, forming a first stomach, in the anterior part of the abdomen, a sort of ante- chamber to the true stomach, which is very different in shape, and which is followed by the intestines leading to the anus, or vent. Everything passing from the mouth to the stomach must go through the honey sac, but the bee has the power of retaining the nectar in this sac, and afterwards disgorging it through the mouth, without letting it enter the true stomach at all. Connected with the cesophagus, in front of the honey sac, there are important glands in the head and in the front part of the abdomen, which secrete the so-called salivary juice, which, as Professor Cook states, “aids in kneading wax, etc., as already described. It also probably aids in modifying the sugar while the nectar is in the bee’s stomach.” This would account partly for the difference observable between honey and other merely saccharine matter. THE STING. The sting of the worker bee is a very complicated organ, as will be seen by a study of the following engraving, taken from Root’s “A BC of Bee Culture.” In the general view of the sting, I, is the double gland which secretes the poison ; A, the cylindrical reservoir in which the poison is collected from the glands, and from which it is trans- mitted through hollows in the spears or lancets to the wound ; B, the two barbed lancets; and p, the third spear or awl, usually styled the sheath, in which the other two partly slide when at work. In the cross section (greatly enlarged) of the 60 AUSTRALASIAN lancets, at the point D, it will be seen how the two hollow lancets, A and B, slide on ribs or guides in the concave side of the so-called sheath, D. They have tubes, F and G, through which, as well as through the tube &, formed between the three parts of the sting, the poisonous fluid is transmitted. There is a hollow, ©, in the awl or sheath, D, but it is only for strength and lightness, and is not open either above or below. In the Fig..17,—-THE BEE STING, I. Bee sting, magnified. II. One of the barbed lancets. III. Cross section of lancets at v. IV, Drop of the poison, crystallised. barbed lancets, the end of one of which is shown, greatly mag- nified, there are grooves, G, to fit on the ribs of the sheath, and BEE MANUAL. 61 the poison, which is conveyed down the hollow tube inside of each, finds vent by small side openings to the barbs at Hu. It appears that when the wound is first pierced by the smooth and highly polished point of the awl D, a sliding motion is com- municated to the barbed lancets by the muscles shown at J and K, and the poison is pumped into the wound through the centre cavity E; the barbed lancets are then driven in by alternate motions, and at the same time the centre cavity is closed by valves at the root of the sting, and the poison is forced through the tubes in the hollow lancets, and through the side openings near the barbs. The barbs having once penetrated any tough material, such as the human skin, cannot be withdrawn by a direct pull. The bee, if left to itself, will gradually work round and round until it screws out the sting, but if it be abruptly shaken or brushed off, the whole sting is torn out of its body and left behind. In that case the muscles will continue to work and to force poison into the wound for some time, if the sting be not carefully extracted, which should be done without squeezing the poison reservoirs at its base. The body of a bee that had been dead for hours has been known to sting in that way. The injury occasioned to a bee by the tearing out of its-sting must be very severe, and it has been generally supposed that they must die immediately afterwards. Sir John Lubbock, however, in his work on “ Ants, Bees, and Wasps,” says: “Though bees that have stung and lost their sting always perish, they do not die immediately, and in the meantime they show little sign of suffering from the terrible injury.” He mentions having seen a bee after losing its sting, remain twenty minutes on the floor-board, enter the hive, return in an hour, feed quietly on some honey, and again return to the hive. Mr. A. I. Root says he has kept bees some time in confinement after being so injured, and could not see but they flew off just as well as bees that thad not lost their sting.” He even inclines to think they may live and gather honey afterwards. Recent researches by the French naturalist, M. G. Carlet, show that the two glands secrete two different sorts of liquids, the combined action of which makes the poison so virulent. In the translation of M. Carlet’s paper, given in the American Apiculturist of December, 1884, it is stated that although the stinging of a fly by a bee causes the instantaneous death of 62 AUSTRALASIAN the former, yet if a fly be inoculated with the product of one of the two venomous glands of the bee, it will not die for a long time ; the successive inoculations of the same fly with the products of the two glands causes death in a very short time after the second inoculation. The conclusions come to are— “1, The poison of the hymenoptera is always acid. 2. It is composed of a mixture of two liquids, one strongly acid, the other feebly alkaline, and acts only when both liquids are present, 3. These are produced by two special glands that may be called the acid gland and the alkaline gland. 4. These two glands both expel their contents at the base of the throat from which the sting darts out.” REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS OF THE QUEEN, The most important organs of the queen-bee—themselves forming perhaps one of the most wonderful objects of nature, and~of which the very accurate knowledge which we now possess, owing to the patient researches of many naturalists, has done more than aught else for the progress of scientific bee-culture—are her ovaries and the parts attached thereto, which are illustrated in the following engraving. The two fig-shaped bodies are the ovaries, which are multi- tubular, there being more than a hundred tubes (called the ovigian tubes) in the two ovaries of a queen bee. In these tubes the eggs grow and develop themselves until they are fit to be deposited. Each ovary has a separate oviduct at bottom, through, which the eggs pass for some distance, until the two join in one common oviduct leading to the vulva, or vent, through which the eggs are ultimately deposited. A little below the junction of the passages from the two ovaries, and on the outside of the common oviduct, is a small globular body, shown on the right hand side in the engraving. This is a hollow vessel, called the spermatheca, of which much has to be said. More than two hundred years ago Swammerdam published an excellent illustration of the ovaries of a queen bee, showing the spermatheca, but he conjectured that it secreted a fluid for sticking the eggs to the bottom of the cells in the comb. In his time but little was known of what went on within the hive. It was no doubt assumed by many that every single egg laid by the queen required to be fertilised by a separate act of the drone, while Swammerdam himself conceived the idea that no BEE MANUAL, 63 copulation was necessary, but that some gaseous emanations from the body of the drone produced fecundation by pene- trating the body of the queen. About a hundred years later great advances were made in the knowledge of the physiology of the bee. It is said that Jansha, apiarist to the Empress Maria Theresa of Austria, discovered the fact that young queens have to leave the hive to meet the drones ; but it is to the labours of Huber in 1787 and following years, and com- t a ca nsdn ge OOD D000 EE Gun fy 9900 0900 ey Corian) Bog Fig. 18.—OVARIES OF QUEEN. municated in his letters addressed to Bonnet in the years 1789 to 1791, that we owe the first knowledge of the following main facts:—1. That the queen bee is truly oviparous; that what she deposits is a true egg, which takes three days to produce a living maggot or larva—(even the great Bonnet was inclined up to that time to believe that a minute worm, and not an egg, was produced by the queen). 2. That the queen must be impregnated by the drone in order to become fertile. 3, That 64 AUSTRALASIAN copulation is accomplished outside the hive and while on the wing high in the air. 4. That one impregnation was sufficient to fertilise all the eggs laid by the queens subsequently for two years at least, perhaps for life. 5. But that if the act of impregnation was delayed beyond the twenty-first day of the queen’s life, her eggs would afterwards produce only drones. Huber also proved that queens could be reared from the larva of worker eggs, and also that in some rare cases workers were able to lay eggs, which, however, could only produce drones. He investigated other matters of the greatest importance to the science of bee-culture, and has been gratefully designated THE PRINCE oF APICULTURISTS by Langstroth. He failed, however, to discover the secrets of the spermatheca, and re- mained under the false impression that the fertilisation of the eggs took place in the ovaries and that there were two sorts of eggs, one sort to produce workers and queens, the other to produce drones, and that they occupied separate portions of the ovaries. His cotemporary, Schirach, who also contributed much to apiarian science, supposed that one branch of the ovaries contained the one sort and the second branch the other sort of fertilised eggs. In this state the science remained for some sixty years. Langstroth says it is now ascertained that Posel, in a work published at Munich in 1784—therefore previous to the experiments of Huber-——“ describes the sperma- theca and its contents and the use of the latter in impregnating the passing egg;” and also that “years ago the celebrated Dr. John Hunter and others supposed that there must be a permanent receptacle for the male sperm opening into the oviduct.” Nothing certain was known, however, until 1845, when the brilliant discoveries of Dzierzon led to the promul- gation of the THEORY which bears his name, and especially to the doctrine of PARTHENOGENESIS. On this point Professor Cook says :— “This strange ee pe peehia ee of the eggs without impreg- nation—was discovered and proved by Dzierzon in 1845. Dr. Dzierzon, who as a student of orsetiol and scientific apiculture must rank with the great Huber, is a Roman Catholic priest of Carlsmarkt, Germany. This doctrine—called Parthenogenesis, which means produced from a virgin—is still doubted by some quite able bee-keepers, though the proofs are irrefragable.” BEE MANUAL. 65 No wonder that people were slow to accept this wonderful doctrine. Von Berlepsch, in his exposition of the Dzierzon Theory, says :— “From time immemorial naturalists have regarded as universally true the doctrine that no living creature can be developed from the egg of a female without male impregnation, And whee occasionally exceptional cases were addwcad the men of science treated the state- ments with contempt, or endeavoured to impugn their force or validity by assuming that the observers were either incompetent or careless.” Dr. Dzierzon’s discoveries accordingly were received with incredulity and sometimes with derision ; but magna est veritas, et prevalebit / Dr. Dzierzon was assisted in proving his case by such scientists as Professors Leuckart and Von Siebold of Munich, and by the Baron von Berlepsch, the author of the celebrated “ Apistical Letters.” Von Siebold ‘‘demonstrated clearly, that not only do living larve occasionally issue from a portion of the unimpregnated eggs of the silkworm, and develop as moths—some male, others female ; but that in various species of butterflies the virgin females regularly lay eggs which, not partially only and occasionally, but uniformly and without exception, produce females.” Prof. Leuckart subsequently noticed a still greater number of exceptions, and says :— “‘ There can be no doubt that parthenogenesis exists far more exten- sively among insects than is now known or anticipated.” And Von Berlepsch adds :— “This exception is found also among bees; with this difference, however, that among them al/ the eggs which remain unimpregnated invariably develop as males, and those which are impregnated invaria- bly develop as females, and that the impregnation of the egg determines its feminine sexuality. Consequently, in the case of bees, not only is every egg susceptible of development, though unimpregnated, but masculinity pre-exists therein, which (marvellous indeed !) is trans- formed into feminity by impregnation with the male sperm.” THE DZIERZON THEORY. Space will not admit of going into the details of observations and experiments by which the case has been proved. I shall only add the thirteen “ propositions” of the Dzierzon theory, F 66 AUSTRALASIAN which are now accepted as correct in almost every particular, and each one of which is fully discussed in the excellent work of the Baron von Berlepsch :— “1, A colony of bees, in its normal condition, consists of three cha- racteristically different kinds of individuals—the queen, the workers, and (at certain periods) the drones. “2. In the normal condition of a colony, the queen is the only perfect female present in the hive, and lays all the eggs found therein. These eggs are male and female. From the former proceed the drones; from the latter, if laid in narrow cells, proceed the workers, or undeveloped females; and from them also, if laid in wider, acorn-shaped, and vertically suspended, so-called royal cells, lavishly supplied with a peculiar pabulum or jelly, proceed the queens. “*3, The queen possesses the ability to lay male or female eggs at pleasure, as the particular cells she is at the time supplying may require. ‘4, In order to become qualified to lay both male and female eggs, the queen must be fecundated by a drone, or male bee. ‘5. The fecundation of the queen is always effected outside of the hive, in the open air, and while on the wing. Consequently, in order to become fully fertile, that is, capable of laying both male and female eggs, the queen must leave her hive at least once, “6, In the act of copulation, the genitalia of the drone enter the ee of the queen, are there retained, and the drone simultaneously erishes. e “7, The fecundation of the queen, once accomplished, is effica cious during her life, or so long as she remains healthy and vigorous; and when once become fertile, she never afterwards lgaved her hive, except when accompanying a swarm. ‘*8, The ovaries of the queen are not impregnated in copulation ; but a small vesicle, or sac, which is situated near the termination of the oviduct, and communicating therewith, becomes charged with the semen of the drone. “*9, All eggs germinated in the ovary of the queen develop as males, unless impregnated by the male sperm while passing the mouth of the seminal sac or spermatheca when descending the oviduct. If they be thus impregnated in their downward passage (which impregr- nation the queen can effect or omit at her pleasure) they develop as females. 10. If a queen remain unfecundated she ordinarily does not lay eggs. Still exceptional cases do sometimes occur, and the eggs then laid produce drones only. ‘11. If, in consequence of superannuation, the contents of the spermatheca of a fecundated queen become exhausted; or, if from enervation or accident, she lose the power of using the muscles connected with that organ, so as to be unable to im regnate the passing egg, she will thenceforward lay drone eggs only, if she lay at all. * BEE MANUAL, 67 ‘©12, As some unfecundated queens occasionally lay drone eggs, so also in queenless colonies, no longer having the requisite means of: securing a queen, common workers are sometimes found that lay eggs, from which drones only proceed. These workers are likewise unfecundated, and the eggs are uniformly laid by some individual bee, regarded and iecoted more or less by her companions as their queen. ‘13. So long as a fertile queen is present in the hive, the bees do not tolerate a fertile worker. Nor do they tolerate one while cherish- ing the hope of being able to rear a queen. In rare instances, however, exceptional cases occur. Fertile workers are sometimes found in the hive immediately after the death or removal of the queen, and even in the presence of a young queen, so long as she has not herself become fertile.” : The foregoing enunciation of the Dzierzon theory is now generally accepted, with scarcely any modification, as the basis of the modern science of Apiculture. As regards Proposition 5, some doubts are still entertained as to whether it may not be possible that fecundation may be, in some rare instances, accomplished within the hive. Professor Cuok indeed states a case as having come under his own observation, where a “queen whose wing was clipped just as she came from the cell, and the entrance to whose hive was guarded by per- forated zinc so that she could not get out, was impregnated, and proved an excellent queen.” He adds, ‘‘so it seems more than possible that mating in confinement may yet become practicable.” Certainly it has not been found practicable as yet, and many additional authentic cases must be recorded before it can even be admitted that there was no possibility of a mistake in the isolated case referred to. Attempts have also recently been made to effect artificial fecundation of the queen larva, and thus produce a queen capable, when she first issues from the cells, of laying both male and female eggs. Some cases of success in this delicate operation have even been asserted, but no satisfactory practical results have been as yet attained. It is the opinion of some who are well qualified to judge, that ultimate success in this direction may be possible, and no doubt the most searching investigation and the most careful experiments will be made until certainty shall be attained on the point. Should it ever be found really practicable to regulate cross-breeding in such a certain manner, it would undoubtedly open quite a new era in queen rearing and in the propagation of peculiar races of bees. 68 AUSTRALASIAN The statement in Propositions 3 and 9, that the queen “can effect or omit at pleasure” the impregnation of the egg when passing the spermatheca, has also been open to much doubt until the recent investigations made by Mr. F. R. Cheshire, which were published in the British Bee Journal in the months of November and December, 1884, and which seem to decide that question in the most satisfactory way, and beyond all doubt. Referring to fig. 18, the reader will bear in mind that it is now ascertained, as set forth in Proposition 8, that the result of the act of fecundation by the drone is simply to fill the spermatheca with a glandular secretion containing the infinitely small spermatozoa, one of which must be intro- duced into the egg through a small opening at its lower end, called the micropyle, in order to change its nature from male to female. The eggs so developed in the ovaries are now understood to be all male eggs ; if they pass through the ovi- duct unaltered, they will produce drones; if they receive a spermatozoon into the micropyle while passing the spermatheca on the downward passage, they develop into workers or queens, z.¢., into worker eggs. The question heretofore has been, how can the queen control the fecundation of the egg? It was for a long time supposed that when the queen inserted her abdomen into the narrow worker cells, in order to deposit her egg, the pressure from the sides of the cell was sufficient to open the passage from the spermatheca, and lead to the impregnation of the passing egg, whereas in a drone cell there was supposed to be no pressure on the body, and that therefore an unimpreg- nated ege was laid init. With regard to the queen cells, in order to support this theory, it had to be assumed that the queen did not lay direct in them, but that the workers supplied these cells with impregnated eggs from the worker cells. Mr. Cheshire, on the contrary, proves that the queen does lay eggs in the queen cells, and further, that no outside pressure, even if leading to the death of the insect, could force open the sperma- theca; that, on the other hand, she has perfect control over the impregnation of the eggs, and can lay male or female eges ‘when and where she pleases. He has discovered and described the beautiful valves by which the passage from the spermatheca into the oviduct are guarded, the muscles by which the queen can open and close them at will, and the manner in which the egg passing down from the ovary is allowed to receive one of BEE MANUAL. 69 the spermatozoa through the opening of the micropyle; and this leads him to the very natural reflection— ‘*What children we must feel ourselves, how utterly baffled and confounded by the reflection that this tiny spermatozoon, eight or ten millions of which the queen may carry in her microscopic spermatheca, has about it—somehow and somewhere—that which shall determine, not sex merely, but all distinctions of species, such as the external form of the body, the length and modelling of the tongue, the arrange- ment of the pigment cells, the colour of the covering plates, the tint of every hair, and the general temper and disposition of the resulting insect, besides a thousand other peculiarities! We speak of what the microscope has revealed, and without gainsaying it is surpassingly poe ; but how little have we found, compared with what lies ehind!” And in another place he has a beautifully expressed passage which we gladly copy as an appropriate conclusion to our slight survey of the anatomy and physiology of the bee. “Our bees,” he concludes, ‘‘ are miracles of creative skill, which to a better insight but thinly veils the Worker whose understanding is infinite ; and we are not in our weakest moments when He, ‘ clearly seen by the things that are made,’ draws us to bow the head and worship.” DEVELOPMENT FROM THE EGG TO THE BEE, Having now come to understand the manner in which the egg, whether male or female, comes to be laid, we may examine the egg itself, and the way in which the germ it contains becomes developed into the full-grown insect. Fig, 19.-QUEEN’S EGG UNDER THE MICROSCOPE. The egg, when laid in the cell, requires a tolerably sharp sight to distinguish it as it lies at the bottom, attached by one end to the comb by means of some glutinous fluid with which 70 AUSTRALASIAN it is coated. It is very small, and not round or oval likea bird’s egg, but long, like a small worm or maggot. It is, how- ever, a true egg, and presents, when greatly magnified, the appearance shown. Sites Tt appears covered with a sort of delicate network, which is, in fact, its shell, and it has a yolk and surrounding white, or albumen, like all eggs of birds or reptiles. When deposited in a worker cell, it remains unchanged in outward appearance for three days, when the larva first appears as a minute worm, and goes through the stages of development shown in the following figure ; the numbers underneath denoting the age, in days, from the laying of the egg. ut it ase te rs = AT) A a _ 18 1 38 4 56 Fig, 20,_FROM THE EGG TO THE BEE. The larva, when it emerges from the egg, is fed by the workers, which act as nurses, with a mixture of bee-bread, honey, and water, the two first-mentioned materials having undergone a partial digestion in the stomachs of the bees, and. been converted into a species of chyle. Whether the water is mixed with the food so prepared, or is required for the process of digestion to prepare it, certain it is that during the breeding time great: numbers of bees are to be seen imbibing water, and bringing it to the hive. This process of feeding the larve continues five days for the workers and six and a half days for the drones, and the cells are then capped with a mixture of wax and pollen, which forms a safe covering for the cells, but is sufficiently porous to admit the air necessary for the life of the larva and pupa, or nymph, during its period of metamor- phosis. As soon as the cell is closed, the grub begins to spin a web or cocoon round itself; this spinning goes on for thirty-six hours, when the cocoon is complete, and then ensues a period of rest, or apparent rest, and subsequent metamorphosis, during which time a wonderful transformation is going on from hour BEE MANUAL. 71 to hour. This includes the pupa or nymph period, and lasts altogether thirteen days for workers and fourteen and a half for drones ; and at length, on the twenty-second day from the laying of the egg in the former, or on the twenty-fifth day in the latter case, the fully formed bee cuts through the capping of the cell with its mandibles, and emerges complete in every respect, and ready, without any previous training, education, or experience, to fulfil its functions, to execute all the delicate operations, and to observe those rules of conduct which appear to us (and justly) to be such marvels of intelligence, ingenuity, dexterity, and even foresight. Itis true that the actions of these insects, from the moment they break through the cover- ing of their cells, are evidently prompted and guided by such intelligence and foresight—so indeed was the action of the grub in spinning its own cocoon ;—but is it not absurd to attribute the consequent results to any exercise of a reasoning faculty in Fig. 21_—WORKER NYMPH AND LARVA, IN COMB. the insect? Even if we suppose it endowed at once with the reasoning powers of man himself, would it not require a long period of experience, or education, or both, before it could be capable of building a cell or seeking for and bringing home a load of honey or of pollen? It is therefore a mistake to talk of the intelligence or ingenuity of the bee; we have here to deal evidently with instinct, which is simply the exercise, on the part of the insect, of an intelligence not its own, and which, to make use again of Mr. Cheshire’s most appropriate words, “but thinly veils the Worker whose understanding is infinite.” The foregoing illustration (Fig. 21) shows very clearly, at about three times the natural size, the larva when just closed in its cell, and before spinning its cocoon, and the pupa, or nymph, when nearly developed, with the exception of the wings. 72 AUSTRALASIAN The cells in which queen, or perfect female bees are laid and developed differ widely from those of the workers and drones : in the natural state, they are only built in the swarming season, or in cases where the colony has become queenless ; in the former case the cells are laid out for the purpose on the under side or on the edges of the comb, as shown in the following engraving, which exhibits, on an enlarged scale, the top view of a number of worker cells, with the egg and larva in the dif- ferent stages of development up to the time of capping the cells (in the line marked a); a section of a queen cell (0), showing the larva and a supply of the royal jelly, and a similar one completed and closed (at c). , Fig. 22,—WORKER LARVE AND QUEEN CELLS, Langstroth, in describing the queen cells, says :— ‘These cells somewhat resemble a small pea-nut, and are about an inch deep and one-third of an inch in diameter. Being very thick, they require much wax for their construction. They are seldom seen in a perfect state after the swarming season, as the bees, after the queen has hatched, cut them down to the shape of a small acorn cup.” The material of which these cells are composed is not pure wax; there is much pollen mixed with it. The outside surface is uneven and indented like the sides of a thimble. The num- ber built at one time varies much, according to circumstances— sometimes only two or three, but ordinarily not less than five, BEE MANUAL. 73 and sometimes more than a dozen. They are built to hang as nearly vertical as possible, the broader end uppermost, and gradually narrowing towards the point below. The queen lays her egg in the cell when it is about half built; after three days, as in the case of workers and drones, the larva is hatched ; the workers then feed the larva for five days with an abundance of so-called “royal jelly,” which appears to be much the same as that fed to worker larve, only perhaps more carefully prepared. Mr. Root says on this point :— «Tt has also been said that the queens receive the very finest, most perfectly digested, and concentrated food that they (the workers) can prepare. This I can readily believe, for the royal jelly has a very rich taste—something between cream, quince jelly, and honey, with a slightly tart and rank, strong milky taste, that is quite sickening if much of it be taken. Iam inclined to think that the same food that is given the young larve at tirst will form royal jelly, if left exposed to the air, as it is in the broad open queen cells.”’ This food is deposited in a considerable quantity in the quecn cell before it is closed (see 6 in last figure). The queen larva takes only one day to spin its cocoon, as it only covers the upper half of the body. This fact was observed by Huber, and commented upon in the following manner :— ‘