| J-F.puGcGaR |i 1 “y - H. BAILEY) A 2 ee New York State College of Agriculture At Gornell University Ithaca, N. B. Library Cornel Univera.., — SB 185.D8 Wii ps (exclusive of fora inn | THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK - BOSTON + CHICAGO SAN FRANCISCO MACMILLAN & CO., Limitep LONDON + BOMBAY + CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Lr. TORONTO SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (EXCLUSIVE OF FORAGE PLANTS) BY JOHN FREDERICK DUGGAR DIRECTOR OF THE ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AND PROFESSOR OF AGRICULTURE IN THE ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE Ne York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1916 All rights reserved Coryrieut, 1911, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published April, r911- Reprinted September, 1911 ; November, 1912; September, 1913: September, 1914; April, 1915; September, November, 1916. Norwood jpress J. 8, Cushing Co. — Berwick & Smith Co. Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. Zo MY PARENTS DR. REUBEN HENRY DUGGAR AND MARGARET LOUISA (MINGE) DUGGAR THIS BOOK IS AFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED AS A SLIGHT TOKEN OF APPRECIATION OF THEIR HIGH IDEALS AND CAREFUL PARENTAL TRAINING “ . . = ar) ~ . a e wee ee ee ee ee ee . s c be RR OR ee, : . : 7 c ae o ; 7, - o J r =. ad =. - ied .- Pa al a 7 ‘ Pee 7 . oe Sy ree ae ee ee EDITOR’S PREFACE THERE are many types of text-books in agriculture. Three types have now found their places in The Rural Text-Book Series: One type, represented by Warren’s “Elements of Agriculture,” expounds the general basis and practice of the agricultural pursuit; another type, represented in Lyon and Fippin’s “ Principles of Soil Man- agement,” presents in detail one of the large fundamental subjects; and another type, represented in the present volume, explains the reasons and practices underlying the raising of particular crops. These three honest books also represent three ranges of presentation: the Warren, a high school method; the Lyon and Fippin, a distinctly college method; and the Duggar, an intermediate method, designed for both advanced high school and college. A book may be adapted at the same time to college work and to reading and reference by the best farmers. The practicing farmer is increasingly requesting books that give him real reasons and real facts. Text-books will increase in use among farmers, not only among those farmers who have had college instruction, but also with those who have come to their work by other routes, but who desire to proceed substantially. These text-books open new fields of observa- tion. How many farmers really know how the roots of the wheat plant look, or what is their mode of growth, or how these roots compare with those of oats? How many know vii vill EDITORS PREFACE the form and features in detail of the leaves of wheat and barley and oats and rye? And yet all good farming rests on good observation, and on sound reasoning from the facts and phenomena that one observes. I have been struck with the suggestions for original and painstaking observation that the pages of this book contain. It presents a type of teaching method that was well put in book form by Hunt in his “Cereals in America,’ — the method that sends the learner directly to the plant in the field, to make careful observation from tip of root to tip of top. Most farmers do not even yet really know the plants that they till. This volume by Duggar will discover his cotton and his cane to many a man who long has grown them, but who has known them not. These makers of observation text-books, that present the crops and the animals in their real and living details, will set going a great quiet movement to examine minutely the conditions of agricultural failure and success. L. HW. BAILEY. AUTHOR’S SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Tuts book has been prepared to fill the needs of two classes of individuals, — students desiring a full and practi- cal, yet logical and pedagogical treatment of the staple crops of the South, and farmers seeking a simple presentation of the scientific principles underlying agriculture, together with a condensed statement of the results of recent experiments and experience. Scientific terms have been excluded, except when de- manded by accuracy and clearness, so that farmers having no training in the use of such terms may be able to read the volume understandingly. The meaning of every unfamiliar term may be found in the glossary. Farmers will usually omit the reading of the Exercises except when pursuing a course of instruction, as in some study-center, or short- course, or correspondence-course. As a text-book, this volume is intended especially to serve for classes in high-schools and normal schools. It is also in- tended to constitute an outline of the subject for college use. In high-school classes, it is expected that the teacher will direct the students to omit all the matter printed in small type, all technical names in parentheses, and such of the exercises as deal with crops of which specimens cannot be found in the neighborhood. ix x AUTHOR'S PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For high-school use, the matter may be further abridged by the omission of the study of those particular crops that are unsuited to the locality. College students are expected to prepare all the matter in this book, including that in fine print, and all Exercises. Their instructors will probably assign additional work on the crops of chief interest to the locality. These additions will usually take the form of supplementary lectures and of collateral reading selected from the literature cited under each crop. It is scarcely necessary to point out that the use of a text- book to afford at least the outline of the subject-matter on crops will enable the student to cover much more ground than would be possible if he relied exclusively on lecture notes. The use of a text-book is also advantageous to the instructor, since it permits him to devote a larger proportion of his time to supplementary lectures, which will direct in- creased attention to local problems and practices, suggest methods of agricultural investigation, and discuss the most effective methods of teaching the subject of agriculture. The author desires to express his thanks to the numerous friends who have assisted him in this work, and especially to the following: To Messrs. C. A. Cauthen, H. P. Agee, W. R. Dodson, J. N. Harper, and C. R. Ball for reading the manu- script of certain chapters; and to Dr. L. H. Bailey for editorial work and for the use of certain illustrations from his Cyclopedia of American Agriculture. Grateful acknowledgment is made to Dr. W. E. Hines for a number of photographs of insects; to Professor L. N. Duncan for making the photographs of corn ears; and to Miss C. M. Cook, who made most of the drawings prepared especially for this book. In the List of Illustrations credit AUTHOR'S PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi is given in detail to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and to those Experiment Stations that contributed photo- graphs for this volume. J. F. DUGGAR. AUBURN, ALABAMA, January 2, 1911. CONTENTS CHAPTER I Oats — Avena sativa Structure, 1; Varieties, 6; 22 PAGES . -31 Climate, Soils, and Renieds 13; Cultural Methods, 16; netics: 25; Laboratory Exer- cises, 29; Literature, 31. CHAPTER II Wueat— Triticum sativum Structure and Composition, 32; 40; Soils, Rotation, and Fertilizers, 45; Sowing, 50; ercises, 64; Literature, 67. CHAPTER III Rye anp Barley ‘ ; . ‘ . Rye — Secale cereale . ‘ 3 : 7 Barley — Hordeum sativum % Laboratory Exercises, 77 ; Literature, 77. CHAPTER IV Corn or Maize — Zea mays Species and Varieties, Preparation and Harvesting, 58; Enemies, 59; Laboratory Ex- 32-67 68-77 . . . 68 78-97 Structure, 80; The Corn Grain or Kernel, 92; Laboratory Exercises, 95; Literature, 97. CHAPTER V Corn — CoMPposiITION AND JUDGING . . Judging Corn, 101. Laboratory Exercises, 102; Literature, 111. xiii . . 98-111 Xiv CONTENTS CHAPTER VI Corn— Races AND VARIETIES . . . ms Laboratory Exercises, 125; Literature, 126. CHAPTER VII Corn — BREEDING OR IMPROVEMENT . r . Laboratory Exercises, 148; Literature, 149. CHAPTER VIII Corn —So1rs, Rotations, AND FERTILIZERS PAGES . - 112-126 . 127-149 : - 150-157 Soils, 150; Rotation, 151; Fertilizers, 153; Laboratory Exercises, 157; Literature, 157. CHAPTER IX Corn — Tue TILLAGE oR CULTIVATION Laboratory Exercises, 188 ; Literature, 188, CHAPTER X Corn — Harvestine Laboratory Exercises, 204; Literature, 205. CHAPTER XI Corn — ENEMIES . « 158-188 . - 189-205 + 206-216 Insects, 206; Fungous Diseases, 214; Laboratory Exer- cises, 216 ; Literature, 216. CHAPTER XII Rice — Oryza sativa Laboratory Exercises, 229; Literature, 230. . - 217-230 CONTENTS xV CHAPTER XIII PAGES Tue Sorcuums— Andropogon sorghum . : . . 281-247 The Sorghums in General, 231; Saccharine or Sweet Sor- 92 ghums, 234; Kafir, 239; Milo, 240; Broom Corn, 244; Laboratory Exercises, 245; Literature, 246. CHAPTER XIV Cotton —SrTRUCTURE AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS . 248-266 Laboratory Exercises, 265; Literature, 266. CHAPTER XV Cotton —ComPposiTION AND THE PRINCIPAL Uses . . 267-2738 Laboratory Exercises, 273 ; Literature, 273. CHAPTER XVI Cotron — THE PRINCIPAL SPECIES 3 . 274-281 Laboratory Exercises, 281; Literature, 281. CHAPTER XVII Cotron — VARIETIES OF AMERICAN UPLAND . . 282-299 Laboratory Exercises, 299; Literature, 299. CHAPTER XVIII Cotton BREEDING 3 ; a : 5 - - 800-814 Laboratory Exercises, 313; Literature, 314. CHAPTER XIX : ° ; . 815-840 General Considerations on Fertilizing Cotton, 315; Ni- trogenous Fertilizers, 325; Phosphatic Fertilizers, 329; Pot- ash Fertilizers, 332 ; Miscellaneous Fertilizers and Effects of Fertilizers, 335 ; Laboratory Exercises, 339; Literature, 339. Cotton —Soirs AnD FERTILIZERS H xvi CONTENTS CHAPTER XX PAGES Corron — Tue CULTIVATION OF THE AMERICAN UPLAND Group 841-860 Laboratory Exercises, 360 ; Literature, 360. CHAPTER XXI Cotron — HarvestinG AND MARKETING Laboratory Exercises, 376 ; Literature, 376. CHAPTER XXII Corron— History AND STATISTICS . e é Laboratory Exercises, 387 ; Literature, 387. CHAPTER XXIII Corron — Insect ENEMIES . . - 9861-876 . . 877-387 888-410 Cotton Boll-worm, 388; Mexican Cotton Boll-weevil, 392 ; Insects of Minor Importance, 407; Laboratory Exercises, 410; Literature, 410. CHAPTER XXIV Corron —Funcous anp Otner Disrases . Laboratory Exercises, 420; Literature, 420. CHAPTER XXV Heme — Cannabis sativa Laboratory Exercises, 424 ; Literature, 424. CHAPTER XXVI SweeEt-rotatTo — Ipomea batatas . 411-420 . . 422-424 425-456 Composition and Uses, 428; Varieties, 431; Soils, Fer- tilizers, and Rotation, 434; Cultural Methods, 438; Har- vesting and Storing Sweet-potatoes, 447; Enemies, 452; Laboratory Exercises, 455; Literature, 455. CONTENTS xvii CHAPTER XXVII PAGES Cassava — Manihot utilissima . . ‘ a . « 457-462 Laboratory Exercises, 462; Literature, 462. CHAPTER XXVIII Peanut — Arachis hypogea : R Fi : I . 463-483 Laboratory Exercises, 482; Literature, 483. CHAPTER XXIX Scear-cane — Saccharum officinarum a‘ : < « 484-522 Composition, 492; Soils and Fertilizers, 494; Cultural Methods, 499; Varieties, 506; Harvesting and Uses, 508; Sirup Making, 515; History and Statistics, 518; Enemies, 520 ; Laboratory Exercises, 522; Literature, 522. CHAPTER XXX Topacco— Nicotiana tabacum . : 3 3 z . 623-547 Cultural Methods, 530; Harvesting and Curing, 539 ; Enemies, 545; Laboratory Exercises, 546; Literature, 547. GLossaRyY . . ‘ 2 < . . x z . 549 INDEX . : . : ‘ ‘ ‘ ° ‘ ‘ - 563 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. 1. Part of an Oat Plant, showing the Absence of Clasps 2. A Panicle of Oats . : 5 ; 3. Oak Spikelet in Bloom. (L. H. Bailey) 4. Spikelets of Red Rust-proof Oats . 5. A Panicle of Red Rust-proof Oats 6. Burt Oats 7. Spikelets of Burt Oats 8. Oats destroyed by Smut : ; é 9. Green-bug ( Toroptera arent, (S. J. Hunter) . 10. Two Stages of a Lady-bug which destroys Green-bugs. (S. J. Hunter) é : : 11. Oats and Wheat grown with Caicea Clover: (Alabama Experiment Station) . : . ; 12. Part of a Young Wheat Plant ‘ 13. Floret of Wheat. (L. H. Bailey) 3 14. A Head, Spikelet, and Grain of Bearded Wheat . 15. A Typical Head of Beardless Wheat 5 16. A Good Sample of Wheat. (California Heperment Station) 17. Heads of Wheat 18. Heads of Wheat : F é ‘ 19. Shocks of Wheat from Pua aes (Alabama Experiment Station) . 20. Double-disk Grain Drill. 21. Loose Smut of Wheat 2 A e 22. The Angoumois Grain-moth. (W. E. Hinds) 23. Heads of Southern Rye 24. Part of a Young Rye Plant, showing ihe small Blakes a ihe Leaves . . 25. A Mixture of Rye ae Grindett Clov er. ‘ . ’ 26. Ergotina Headof Rye. (L. H. Bailey) . . . xix a mm co co w oo wb oO WeParndAarn cS oO woe 63 69 70 72 73 xx FIG. . A Head and Grains of Bearded Barley . E : 3 ‘ 28. 29. 9 ov. eo oo er) i 9 39 co te LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS The Large Clasps of Barley Leaf . ‘ . . . . Head and Spikelet of Beardless Barley . 5 - 3 Roots of Corn 47 Days after Level Planting. on Ex- periment Station) . Showing Roots of Corn 47 Days after Planting in “Deep Furrows. (Kansas Experiment Station) . : . . Brace-roots on the Corn Plant : . 5 Part of a Corn Leaf showing Wavy Margins. p . An Ear of Corn on which Leaf-blades are borne on fia Tips of many of the Shucks Differences in Height and Position of Far in the ‘Same va. riety Diagram showing Gouna of the Pollen: bake Frans silk to Ovary. (C.S. Ridgway) . : ‘ : The Embryo-sac of Corn at the Time of weruiation: (F. E. Lloyd) ‘ : : ‘ : . i . . A Well-propor tiénedl Ear of a Hard Yellow Variety . ; . Transverse Section through Corn Grains 40-45. Ears of Henry Grady Corn to be criticized by santa (L. N. Duncan) . ; * Fs - 102-103 46-57. Ears of Corn with Wats Detects, ae N. Duncan) 104-107 58. 59. 60. 61. 66. 67. Ear with Long, Well-formed Grains Ear with Short Grains An Ear having too much Space Reon een Graitins near che Cob An Ear in which ieee? is no Last Gaines betweai Ginine near the Cob Showing Variations among Clann Gisins Various Shapes of Corn Kernels. (Michigan Maiesment Station) . Sections across Gra rains of Tout Flint, Poni = eet: tn Soft Corn Longitudinal Sebtiows insets Grsing of Dent, Flint, “Pop, Sweet, and Soft Corn Showins an Ear with Tip well cov Ei by Shnncies Showing’an Ear Tip not well covered by Shucks PAGE 74 75 76 79 81 82 84 85 87 89 90 91 94 108 108 108 108 109 110 112 113 115 118 FIG. 68, 69. Varieties of Corn. (Alabama Experiment Station) 123, 70. Showing the Immediate Effects of crossing a White Pop Corn with Pollen from a Yellow Dent Corn 71. Relative Yields of the Same Variety of Corn from 2 veut ing Rows of the Same Length. (Oklahoma Experiment Station) . . 72. Diagram showing ‘Arran getnent of aes in Coes Piceaine plot é : , 73. Germinator eee tigun a Sean ee Conte of Beveeaear Stations, U. S. Dept. Agr.) 74, Showing rie from In-breeding nee (CU. s. Depart of Agriculture) . - : 7 75. Showing Larger Yield on oe not ieee: Ww. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) . . 76. Young Corn Plants, from Tip, Middle, ad Butt Hevnals, (Michigan Experiment Station) : = ° . . 77. AStalk-cutter. (B. F. Avery & Sons Co.) . . . . 78. A Subsoil Plow. (L. H. Bailey) . : 7 79. A Turn-plow . : ‘“ ‘ ‘ 80. A Disk-plow. (B. F. de ery ‘& Sens Ca ) 81. Combined Lister and Corn Planter. (U.S. Department e Agriculture) 82. A One-row Corn Plantar: (B. F. skeet & Sous Ce. ). 3. Diagram of Young Corn Plants . - : ‘ 84. Hand Corn Planter, for Replanting 5 ‘ 85. A Spike-tooth Harrow. (B. F. Avery & Sons Gis ) 86. A Weeder. (L. H. Bailey) . - é 87. A One-horse, Spring-tooth Harrow. (B. F. Aven & Sons Co.), . . 88. Check-row Covi Planter swith Double Disks e open a "Hag Furrow. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) 89. Cowpeas growing between Rows of Corn . . 90. The Williamson Method of Corn Culture 91. Condition of Surface after ‘‘ Laying by’’ Corn Sederdine to the Williamson Plan . 92. Showing ‘‘ Throw-board’’ on Wasa — ned in aa Bae LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ing Corn. (Oklahoma Experiment Station). Xxi PAGE 124 127 141 141 146 158 163 164 165 165 167 168 169 171 172 175 182 186 187 190 XXil LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. PAGE 93. Shocking Horse . 7 . 7 . : : : . 194 94. Corn well Shocked. (Oklahoma Experiment Station) . 196 95. Sled Corn Cutter, with Automatic Knife Guards. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) . : . A : . 197 96. A Home-made Sled Corn Cutter. (U.S. Department of Agriculture). : ‘ . : 7 c . . 197 97. A Corn Harvester. (International Harvester Co.) . . 199 98. Corn Husker and Shredder at Work. (L. H. Bailey) . 200 99. A Field of Corn in Alabama that yielded 1032 Bushels per Acre. (Farmer’s Coéperative Demonstration Work) . 203 100. The Budworm of Corn (Diabrotica eae (After Chittenden) . 3 : : . - 206 101. Eggs of Corn Ear-worm on Com Silks. (A. L. Quaintance, U.S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) - 208 102. The Corn Haevorn at Work in the Tip of an Ear of Green Corn. (A. L. Quaintance, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) . 209 103. The Corn Ear-worm neaetae on fie ender Tear es of Cara, (A. L. Quaintance, U. 8. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Ento- mology) . : - - 210 104. The Rice Weevil, most Desinctives in Saoted oan: (Photo by W. E. Hinds) , . ‘ : : ‘ . - 211 105. An Ear of Corn injured = Weevils. (Photo by W. E. Hinds) . . . . - 212 106. Larva of Angoumois Moth ina Guia of Corn, (Photo by W.E. Hinds) . 3 . 5 : : . . - 213 107. The Indian Meal Moth. (Photo by W. E. Hinds) . . 214 108. Corn Smut. (L. H. Bailey) : 3 : < ; - 215 109. Bundles of Two Varieties of Rice p ‘ : - 218 110, 111. Two Types of Rice. (L. H. Bailey) . : - 220 112. Preparing for Rice in Louisiana. (Louisiana Repeuiment Station) . . - 222 113. An Weperitnettal Field of Rice ne rowley ni, (Louisi- ana Experiment Station) . : ‘ : : - 224 114. A Rice Field after Harvest. {fouians Experiment Sta- tion) . f . ; : - 227 115. Heads of Amber Souhun and of Red Kafir ° < - 284 FIG. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. H bo reg H bo oO bh bo bw to aor > Cc Bee co LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS XXili Orange Sorghum. (Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. De- partment of Agriculture) . Goose Neck Sorghum. (Bureau of Plant es v, s. Department of Agriculture) : : A Field of Black-hulled White Katir. “(E. B. Voorhees) Heads of Milo and of Black-hulled White Kafir. (E. B. Voorhees) 5 : ‘ . Broom-corn Brush ‘ A Vegetative Branch from near the Bake of a Cotton Plant A Fruiting Branch of a Cotton Plant . A Cotton Plant . . . . Cotton Plant, on which the Verolatiee Enaehes are : Sap: pressed . A Cotton Plant, ore aie Pints ious Cotton Leaves . Cotton Bolls. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) . A Cotton Plant deficient in Storm-resistance . Storm-resistant Boll and Burs; Bolls and Burs lacking Storm-resistance . Various Shapes of Cotton Bolls 131. A Sea Island Cotton Plant . 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 132. Where Sea Island Cotton is Grown. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) . A Cotton Plant of the Cluster Ty pe. © S. Department of Agriculture) A Fruiting Limb of a Cluster Cotton Plants A Cotton Plant of the Semicluster Type . The Peterkin Type of Cotton Plant 7. A Cotton Plant of the King Type 38. A Cotton Plant of the Big-boll, Scorm-orout ABs pe A Cotton Plant of the Long-staple, Upland Type. (U.S Department of Agriculture) 4 : Fibers of Several Varieties of Cotton . A Productive Cotton Plant of the Toole Varley A Productive Cotton Plant. (University of Georgia) An Unproductive Cotton Plant. (University of Georgia) . Diagram showing a Breeding Plot of Twenty Rows of Cotton . . : . . . : PAGE 279 284 285 286 287 288 289 291 292 297 303 304 311 XXiV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. 145. 146. 147. 8. A Field of Cotton, showing the Effects of Potash in retains Diagram showing Method of selecting Cotton. (H. J. Webber) . . . . . 3 ; Cotton Plants, showing Retention of Teas es ; and Shedding of Leaves . . ‘ A Field of Cotton, Fertilized ma Unfertilized ing the Leaves . . A Middle Burster, or Double Moldboard Plow. (B. F. Avery & Sons Co.) ‘ An Inexpensive Cotton Planter . One Form of Plow-stock A Young Cotton Plant, showing Two cea. idages aad we True Leaves Various Forms of Sweeps on Bonapes used in Soldvating Cotton. (L. H. Bailey) . . An Alabama Cotton Field. (Hamnbe's Coiperative Demon- stration Work) . The Worswick-Hardt Cation Bicker af Wont 5. The Dixie Cotton Picker Vertical Section through the Dixie Cotton “Prokex elise at Work Z : : ‘ : 7 . Section through a awene (Continental Gin Company) . Transverse Section through a Cotton Gin. (Continental Gin Company) . : . : . . Foreign and American Bales : . 5 Cotton Bales left unprotected from Rain . . A Side View of Cotton Bales : Bales from a Gin Compress. (Farmers! Gin Compre ess Company ) ‘ ; The Propelling Mechanism of an old Horse: -power Gin, (From D. A. Tompkins’ ‘‘ Cotton a Factor in Progress ’’) Percentage of the Total American Crop of Cotton grown in Each State in 1908, (U.S. Census Bureau) . : Percentage of World’s Mill Supply of Cotton contributed by Each Country in 1908. (U.S. Census Bureau) . Moths of Cotton Boll-worm and Corn Ear-worm. (U.S, Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) Do © oO oOo eo co FIG. 168. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 186. 187. 188. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS The ee Boll-worm on the Outside of a Cotton Boll. (U. S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) . Pupal or Chrysalis Gia of the Cotton Boll-worm sia ths Corn Ear-worm. ue S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Ento- mology) . Pupa of Boll-worm in its Underground Buneor, (After Quaintance and Brues, U. 8. Department of Agricul- ture) 71. The Mature Boll- ecu (W. E. Hinds) . 2. Cotton Square, showing eee halae Larva in Position. (After W. D. Hunter, U. S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Ento- mology) 3. Punctured Cotton Saad aie W. D. Hunter, U. 8S. Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) s : Cotton Stalk Cutter. (Louisiana Crop Pest donate ere 2 . Side View of Cotton Stalk Cutter. (Louisiana Crop Pest Commission) . Cotton Plant in the “Budding” Stage. (Louisiana Crop Pest Commission) . The Hinds Chain Cultivator. cw. E. Hinds) < . Map showing the Areas infested by the Boll-weevil. (U.S Dept. Agr., Bureau of Entomology) Cowvea-pod Weevil. (After Chittenden, U. S. Dept. “tee 7 Bureau of Entomology) - : 3 . Cotton Plants attacked by Wilt : : Section through Wilted and Healthy Cotton Stalks Root-knot or Nematode Injuries on Cotton Roots. (C. F. Atkinson) : : : . : Anthracnose on Cotton Bolls. (C. F. Atkinson) ; Diseased Leaves, Boll, and Stem of Cotton Plant. cw. A. Orton, Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture) . A Field of Hemp. (Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. De- partment of Agriculture) . : : Leaf and Flowers of Hemp. (L. H. Bailey) Shocking Hemp. (L. H. Bailey) : A . . A Field of Sweet-potatoes in Alabama ‘ . . . XXV PAGE 391 892 402 403 404 408 412 413 416 417 420 XXvi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194, 195. 196. 197. 198. 199. 200. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209, 210. A Branch of a Vineless Sweet-potato Plant. (After Price, Texas Experiment Station) 3 : . é $ Three Shapes of Sweet-potato Leaves. (After Price, Texas Experiment Station) ; : : : : Sweet-potato Slips ready to be at; (U. 8. Department of Agriculture) Devices employed in Setting Saeetpotals “Slips ie ine Cuttings. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) Transplanting Machine ne Sweet-potatoes. m H. Bailey) Sweet-potatoes atiadhad toa : Section of Hantad vine Special Plows for Digging Sweet-potatoes. (U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) 2 End View of House for Storing Sweat-putatoes : Cross Section through Sweet-potato, showing Injuries by Borer. (After Conradi, Texas Experiment Station) Black-rot on Root and Slip of Sweet-potato. (After B. Halsted, New Jersey Experiment Station) The Cassava Plant. (U.S. Department of Aerhenteties) Method of Preparing Bed for Keeping Cassava Seed-stems over Winter. (S. M. Tracy, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) . The Lower Part of a Beate Pant: (U. S. Department of Agriculture) . A Peanut ‘ Popper.”’ ‘Ww. N. ne 3. A Field of Spanish Peanuts grown from Selena ‘Seed. (W. N. Roper, American Nut Journal) 2 Pods and Peas of Three Varieties of Peanuts. (ws Ss De partment of Agriculture) . i ; 3 A Bunch of Spanish Peanuts. (W.N. Roper) . Stacking Peanuts. (U.S. Department of Agriculture) A Part of a Stem of Sugar-cane. (W. C. Stubbs) Cross Section of Part of a Stem of Sugar-cane. (W. R. Dodson) ‘ Cross Section thectigh a Bundle nae the Bean of ieee cane. (W. R. Dodson) ; ‘ One Form of Cane Loader. (L. H. Bailey) 442 444 444 445 449 452 454 455 458 488 488 500 211. 212. 215. 214. 215. 216. 217. 218. 219. 220. 221, 222. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS XXV1l A Field of Velvet Beans : . © < Cutting Sugar-cane in Louisiana. (W. R. Dodson) A Cane Stripper . : : ‘ A 5 ‘ Diagram of Tobacco Flower. (After Shamel and Cobey) . Showing the Results of Breeding a Strain of Tobacco Re- sistant to Disease. (Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Young Tobacco Plants. (Bureau of Plant ase U. Ss. Department of Agriculture) : A Tobacco Seed Blower. (A. D. Shawil) . A Cloth Shade or Tent. (Bureau of Plant Industry, ‘U. s. Department of Agriculture) : . A Transplanting Machine for Satine ‘Teiiseeo: (Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Young Tobacco Plants growing under a Lath Shade in Alabama . Diagram showing how eaves of Wiiguce Fobacco are 2 Cut. (U. 8. Department of Agriculture) . : Southern Tobacco Worm. (U. S. Dept. Agr., Ean at Entomology) . 5 : : : ‘ PAGE 504 508 509 627 Or bo oO ou or bho bw co oOo SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS CHAPTER I OATS — AVENA SATIVA THE oat plant is included in the great family of the grasses (Graminee), as are all the grains. It came into use at a later date than did wheat and barley. The seed or grain of oats is used chiefly as food for horses. It is also employed, in the form of oatmeal and other cereal dishes, as human food. The oat plant is useful for hay and for pasturage. Its straw is utilized as food and bedding for animals and as packing material. STRUCTURE 1. Roots. — The oat, as the other grains, is a fibrous- rooted plant, having no tap-root. The crown from which the main stems originate is usually within about an inch of the surface of the ground. 2. Stems. — The stems of the oat plant originate in the same way as those of the wheat, each as a developed bud or branch, from an older stem. At each underground node of every stem a bud may develop into another stalk and its lower nodes in turn may send out additional shoots, Hence a single plant may bear an indefinite number of stems, the usual number, however, being two to six. A large number is formed by thin sowing and by abundance of moisture and plant-food, or by hilling up earth around B 1 . 2 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS the lower nodes. The conditions that hinder tillering (sometimes limiting the number of stems to one or two to the plant) are thick sowing, late sowing, and deficiency of moisture or plant-food. 3. Leaves. — The leaf-blade of the oat is wider than that of wheat or rye, and on its margins are scattering hairs so fine as to be noticed only on care- ful examination. - At the junction of the leaf-blade and sheath there are no clasps or auricles (Fig. 1), which absence serves to distinguish the young oat plant from that of any other small grain. 4. Pollination. — The oat in na- ture is self-pollinated ; hence there is practically no danger of crossing between different varieties. Sev- eral varieties may properly be sown in adjacent fields, if care is taken to prevent mixing by me- Fic. 1.— Parr or an Oar Chanical means, as in harvesting PLANT. and threshing. Showing the absence of 5. The panicle and spikelets. — pei leaf-blade and The grain-bearing part of the plant, though usually called a head, is really a panicle, or widely branched terminal part of the stem (Fig. 2). The branches of the head originate at the upper nodes or joints of the stem, several usually springing from each node. Each branch may bear a single spikelet (that is, a group of grains) or several spikelets. SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Each spikelet (Fig. 3) consists of two or more flowers, of which usually only two develop into perfect grains. Those that usually develop are the two grains nearest to the branch, the nearer or lower one being almost invari- ably the larger seed. Hence an oat spikelet may be said to consist in most instances of twin grains which may or may not be separated in threshing. The third flower coming from the branch somet mes develops into a small grain, but more frequently it is abortive, Fie. 3. — Oat SPIKE- LET IN BLoom. Showing 2 outer pieces of chaff inclos- ing 2 flowers, each one containing 3 pollen cases (anthers) and 2 plume-like stig- mas. or undeveloped. 6. The grain.— Each grain consists of a nearly cylindrical kernel and of an inclosing hull. This hull is tightly wrapped about the kernel, and is usu- ally not removed in threshing ; but the two parts are not grown together, as shown by the fact that by pinching the grain between the fingers the inner part can readily be forced out, free from any hull. In most states the legal weight of a bushel of oats is 32 pounds. A measured bushel usually weighs 30 to 36 pounds. Oats are sold by the bushel of legal weight. Saunders found that in the cool climate of Canada oats germi- nated well even when the seeds were three years old, after which time the percentage of germination rapidly decreased. CoMPOSITION 7. Analyses. — According to Hunt (“Cereals in Amer- ica’’) the average of American analyses is as follows: — OATS 5 | Oar Oar Oar a Oat Hay | Grain KERNEL STRAW cuTin Oat Hots | | pike Mirk | % Bm | Te | Me | Water . . ./ 11.0 79 | 9.2 15.0 C3 WASH cre ay Wer ais 3.0 2.0 | 5.1 | 5.2 6.7 Protein. . .| 11.8 14.7 | 40 | 93 3.3 Crude fiber. 9.5 0.9 37.0 | 29.2 29.7 Nitrogen-free | extract . .| 59.7 | 67.4 42.4 | 39.0 | 52.0 Fat 5.0 tok 2.3 | 2.3 1.0 Since the percentage of hulls varies in different varieties and in different seasons, the composition of different lots of oats is naturally variable. A sample of oats with slender or incompletely filled grains is inferior in composi- tion and food value to a sample of plump oats. The hull averages about 30 per cent of the total weight of the grain. 8. Draft on soil fertility. — The following table’ shows the amounts of nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash re- moved from the soil in a crop of 40 bushels of oats and the accompanying amount of straw: — PHOSPHORIC | | NITROGEN | | ‘MGIB PorasH | Oat grains, with hulls, per cent . 1.76 | 0.59 0.48 Oat straw, percent . . 0.56 .28 1.62 Oat grain removes in a crop of | 40 bu. (1280 1b.), lb... 22.53 8.83 6.14 0 4.20 24.30 2.5 Oat straw (1500 lb. ) removes, ‘lb. 8.4 Total crop of 40 bu. and 1500 Ib. / ‘ 30.93 of straw removes, lb. 13.03 30.44 1 Calculated from data in Hopkins’ ‘‘Soil Fertility and Per- manent Agriculture.” 6 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS From the above table it may be seen that the oat plant makes considerable demands on soil fertility; that the greater part of the nitrogen and of the phosphoric acid is removed by the grain; and that by far the greater part of the potash is removed by the straw. These figures should impress the fact that the straw should be returned to the land in the form of stable manure, after having been used either as food or bedding. In case it is impracticable to make either of these uses of the straw, the stacks should not be burned nor left to rot in one place, but immediately or after partly rotting the straw should be distributed over the galled spots in the fields. In spite of the fact that a good crop of oats, if the straw be carried off, removes a considerable amount of plant-food, yet ex- perience shows that the occasional introduction of an oat crop into the rotation increases the yield of succeeding crops. This is chiefly because of the vegetation occupying the land after oats are harvested. Even the growth of a mass of weeds may be help- ful to some soils. However, the oat crop gives opportunity to improve the land still more rapidly, due to the sueceeding growth of cowpeas, which is usually the best crop to follow oats. VARIETIES 9. Types of Southern oats. — In Europe, Canada, and the northern part of the United States, the number of varieties of oats in cultivation is considerable. However, nowhere does the number equal that of varieties of wheat. In the Gulf States, few varieties of oats are grown. The types most commonly raised in the South are: — (1) Red Rust-proof; (2) Burt; (8) Turf or Grazing. OATS q Each of these may be known under several names, or may have several strains. For example, among the sub- varieties or selections of the Red Rust-proof we are Appler, Culberson, and Bancroft. 10. Red Rust-proof oats. — This is the most sania type of oats from North Carolina to Texas, and is variously called Red oats, Rust-proof oats, and Texas oats. It and its strains may be recognized, or distinguished from other varieties, by the following characteris- tics: When a bunch of slender bristles is present at the base of the lower grain of a spikelet, they are of greater length than those sometimes occurring on other varieties growing in the South (Fig. 4); and almost invariably both of the developed grains in a spikelet are armed with beards, while in most other varieties the beards, if present, usually occur only on the larger grain in each spikelet. The usual means of or ee ~ Fic.4.—SPIKELETS OF distinguishing Red Rust-proof oats is Rep Rust-pRoorOatTs. by the reddish or yellowish appearance Note length of bris- of the grains that have not been stained ‘les at base of apelelot. by bad weather, and the greater plumpness of the grains as compared with those of other Southern varieties. The head or panicle is rather compact, and the branches short (Fig. 5). The straw of Red Rust-proof oats is stout or large, and on poor or medium land the plants do not grow as tall as do those of Burt and Turf oats. This stout straw makes Red Rust-proof oats less liable to fall or lodge than are the 8 SOUTHERN FIELL CROPS varieties just mentioned. In crops yielding 15 to 30 bushels per acre, there is usually about the same weight Vic. 5.—A Panicte or Rep Rust-proor Oats. of straw as of threshed grain: as the yield increases the percentage of straw increases, OATS 9 The Red Rust-proof variety and its various strains — Appler, Culberson, and Bancroft — may be sown either in the fall or after Christmas. In hardiness toward cold, or ability successfully to withstand a severe winter, this variety is superior to Burt but less hardy than Turf, and decidedly less hardy than barley, wheat, or rye. In spite of the occasional winter-killing of a crop of Red oats sown in the fall, it is usually more profitable throughout the greater part of the cotton-belt to sow in the fall than after Christmas. Means of decreasing winter-killing are in- dicated in paragraph 22. In maturity, the Red Rust-proof group of varieties is earlier by two to three weeks than Turf oats sown at the same time in the fall. When sown after Christmas, Red oats are at least a week later than Burt oats sown at the same time. Red Rust-proof oats are not really completely rust- proof, but strongly rust-resistant. In years when rust is especially severe, this variety is attacked and occasionally rather severely injured, but never to the same extent as other varieties. In yield of grain, the Red Rust-proof type has on the whole been more satisfactory in the cotton-belt than any other. It is especially more productive than Turf oats where the soil is poor or when the weather conditions are unfavorable. Appler is a popular variety of the Red Rust-proof type, which sometimes has proved slightly more productive than an unselected strain of the Red Rust-proof. 11. Burt oats. — This variety (Figs. 6 and 7), sometimes known as “ May oats,” has a slender, bearded grain, usu- 10 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Ira. 6.— Burr Oars. ally of a grayish or light dun color. The branches of the head are long. In the greater part of the cotton region OATS 11 the Burt oat cannot safely be planted in the fall, for it is frequently winter-killed. It is essentially a variety for sowing after Christmas. It is the earliest of the commonly grown varieties of the Southern region. Its earliness, together with its great height of straw, are in its favor when the date of sowing is late. The grain weighs less per bushel than Red oats, and shatters much more easily when harvested. 12. Turf or Grazing oats. —Among the names given to this variety, or to strains of it, are Gray, Virginia Gray, Winter, Turf, and Myers’ Turf. This ee oe is the hardiest of the varieties, and has Note shortness of been known to survive the winters a basal bristles, which little higher than the latitude of northern “”” eee ae Virginia. It is practically safe against winter-killing throughout the cotton-belt; yet it is not so hardy as wheat. The grain is slender and of a gray or light dun color. Usually there are beards on one grain in each spikelet. This oat branches or stools freely, thus making it especially valuable for pasturing, and winning for it the name of “ grazing oats.” The straw is tall and slender. This variety ripens about two weeks later than Red Rust-proof oats sown at the same time. It is much more susceptible to rust ; and on poor land or with unfavorable seasons it often fails to produce plump, well-filled grains. Its best place is in the region just north of the cotton-belt. Turf oats are unsuitable for sowing after Christmas. This variety requires earlier planting in the fall than Red oats. 12 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Turf oats are suitable for sowing with hairy vetch when both vetch and oats are to be threshed for seed. On rich land, the two plants ripen together, and usually enough seed of both are shattered in harvesting to reseed the land the next fall. On poor and medium land Turf oats grow off too slowly to be ready to cut for hay when hairy vetch is in the best condition for hay making. Therefore, for purposes of making hay it is usually better to sow vetch with Red Rust-proof oats than with Turf oats. The weight of straw is usually about double that of grain. 13. Improvement of varieties. — Much less work has been done in improving the oat by selection and breeding than in cotton, corn, and wheat. Breeding experiments at the Alabama Experiment Station with the Red Rust- proof variety have shown clearly that most samples of seed of this variety are badly mixed; that even in apparently uniform samples there are numerous strains or elementary species; and that careful selection of individual plants may result in modifying the yield, the time of maturity, and other qualities. Desirable improvements in the Red Rust-proof variety are: (1) increased yield; (2) greater uniformity ; (3) elimi- nation of the beards and of the black grains; and (4) in- creased resistance to rust. Desirable improvements in the Burt oats are: (1) larger yields; (2) increased uniformity; (3) elimination of the tendency to shatter; (4) greater plumpness of grain; and (5) adaptation of this variety to fall sowing, by selec- tion of plants that withstand the cold of winter. For sowing in the fall, preference should be given to seed from a strain which has been repeatedly sown at this season. OATS 13 CLIMATE, SOILS, AND FERTILIZERS FOR OaTs 14. Climate. — The oat plant is most at home in a cool moist climate. Yet in the Southern States, with a moist but hot climate, it is successfully cultivated, although the yield per acre and the weight per measured bushel are reduced. In the South, climate is most important in de- termining whether Red Rust-proof oats, the kind most extensively grown, should be sown in the fall or after mid- winter. That part of the South in which by far the greater part of the crop of Red Rust-proof oats is sown in the fall lies south of a line drawn nearly through Birmingham in Alabama, Atlanta in Georgia, Charlotte in North Carolina, and Norfolk in Virginia. Yet, ex- perience shows that it is profitable to sow Red Rust-proof oats in the fall considerably northward of this line, though at the risk of more frequent failures from winter-killing. Even in the northern third of the Gulf States, this class of oats, when sown in the fall, is not seriously injured by cold in one winter out of three. Since two crops of fall-sown oats usually yield more than three crops of oats sown after Christmas, fall sowing should be more generally practiced. North of the line indicated above, Turf oats are hardy in most winters, at least as far northward as Maryland. 15. Soils. — The oat is adapted to a wider range of soils than is wheat. In fact, it may be grown on almost any soil on which other ordinary field crops succeed. The low yields of oats as shown by statistics are largely due to the fact that the crop is often sown on land too poor for other profitable use. Moreover, the oat crop is less frequently fertilized than are the other staple crops. Land that is too poor for cotton is usually too poor for oats sown after Christmas, but such land 14 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS can often be profitably utilized by sowing oats in the fall and fer- tilizing in March with nitrate of soda. One difficulty in growing Red Rust-proof oats without fertilizer on poor and rocky land is the fact that the short straw made by this variety under such conditions makes it difficult to save all the heads in harvesting the crop. This difficulty is largely over- come by the use of nitrate of soda and other fertilizers rich in nitrogen. Oats thrive on a moderately rich soil, and fertility is especially important when sowing is done after Christmas. On land exces- sively rich in nitrogen, and at the same time quite moist, there is danger that the straw will grow so tall and weak as to fall or lodge, and thus reduce the yield. The same danger may occur from excessive use of stable manure or other nitrogenous fertilizer. 16. Place in the rotation. — The usual position of the oat crop in a rotation in the cotton-belt is immediately after corn, the oats being followed by cowpeas the same year, and the cowpeas being followed by cotton the next year. This is the logical practice for fall-sown oats, since the corn crop can be removed in October in time for the sowing of oats, while cotton is usually not removed in time for the largest yield of fall-sown oats. However, in regions where spring sowing of oats is practiced, this crop may just as well follow cotton as follow corn. In the usual practice of fall-sowing of oats after corn, the oats get the advantage of the fertilizer produced by the cowpeas that are usually planted between the rows of corn. Inquiry is sometimes made whether it may not be pract* cable to grow oats continuously on the same land with a cateh-crop of cowpeas each summer, the cowpeas to be used for hay. This would be advisable only under exceptional conditions and when phosphoric acid and potash could be restored to the soil in the fertilizer, especially in the fertilizer for the cowpea crop. OATS 15 17. Fertilizers. — Too frequently oats are sown on poor jand without being fertilized. Experiments in several Southern States have shown that it pays to fertilize oats growing on medium or poor lands. On many of these lands, acid phosphate should be used. This may be ap- plied at the rate of 100 to 200 pounds per acre at the time of sowing. It may be run through the fertilizer attach- ment of the grain drill, and its contact with the seed will not injure germination. However, it would not be safe thus to sow through the grain drill and with the seed any considerable amount of cotton-seed meal, or other nitrog- enous fertilizer or of potash salts. While some sandy soils may require for the maximum growth of oats a small amount of potash, it is not usually necessary to apply this fertilizer constituent to the oat crop. The most universal need of oats on the average soils of the cotton-belt is for nitrogen. Since the oat makes its growth in the cooler part of the year when vegetable matter does not rapidly nitrify or become available as plant-food, the best form of nitrogenous fertilizer is nitrate of soda. This fertilizer does not require further change, but is immedi- ately available. Experiments have shown that it is usually profitable to apply any amount of nitrate of soda between 40 and 160 pounds per acre. About 80 pounds per acre is usually advisable. The lumps should be carefully crushed and the fertilizer sown broad- cast as a top-dressing at least two months before the average date of harvest. As arule, the first half of March is a suitable time for applying nitrate of soda to fall-sown oats, and the latter half of the month for spring-sown oats. No covering of soil is necessary in using nitrate of soda, but the 16 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS use of a light harrow or weeder immediately after sowing the fertilizer would often be advantageous, especially if the surface should be quite dry, or if a heavy rain should fall soon after the application. CuLtuRAL METHODS FOR OaTs 18. Preparation of land. — The usual preparation of the land for the oat crop is poorer than for most other crops. Too often the seed is sown broadcast on unplowed land and then covered with a one-horse or two-horse turn-plow. The danger in this procedure is that the seed may be covered too deeply or by large clods, either of which pre- vents the germination of some of the seeds. A method that insures more thorough preparation is the following: plowing, then sowing the seed broadcast, and covering by the use of a disk-harrow. A still better method consists in first plowing the land and then sowing with the grain drill. , Either of these methods permits deeper plowing than is advisable when the seed is covered with the turn-plow. On clean, friable soil oats are sometimes merely disked in without plowing. This method is not so well suited to Southern soils, deficient in vegetable matter, as it is to regions farther north. 19. When to sow. — Repeated experiments have’shown that throughout the greater part of the cotton-belt the yield secured from fall-sown oats is at least 50 per cent greater than from crops sown after Christmas. Frequently fall- sown oats yield twice as much as those sown in February. The exact date of planting that is most likely to give the maximum yield varies with the latitude and climate, and even with varieties. The earliest practicable date for fall- OATS 17 sowing is in the first half of September. In the central and southern part of the cotton-belt, this is too early for sowing Red Rust-proof oats, since it tends to make the plants form stems and to head too early the latter part of the winter, at which stage the oat is easily killed by freezing temperatures. However, very early sowing may be prac- ticed when the oats are to be rather closely grazed through- out the winter. The period that is generally preferred for sowing Red oats extends from October 1 to the middle of November; sowings made in the earlier part of this period usually afford the larger yields. If sowing is postponed much beyond the latter date, the young plants do not have time to become firmly rooted and anchored before they are subjected to heaving by the alternate freezing and thawing of the soil. In sowing oats after Christmas, custom varies greatly, the usual limits being from January 1 to April 1. In the central part of the cotton-belt, probably the first few weeks in February is a safer period than is an earlier date, and any delay after this time is likely to reduce the yield greatly. 20. Drilling versus broadcast sowing. — Some experi- ments have shown advantage in yield from sowing oats with a grain drill as compared with broadcast sowing. Drilling has the advantages: (1) of saving at least half a bushel of seed per acre; (2) placing the seed at a more uniform depth, thus favoring uniformity in ripening; and (3) leaving the plants in a very shallow depression, which affords a slight degree of protection against cold and heaving. c 18 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Extensive experiments in the cotton-belt have proved that, on an average, drilling affords a larger crop than broadcast sow- ing. The Illinois Experiment Station found the smaller yield with broadcast oats to be due in part to the more uneven and generally shallower depth at which the seed were placed in broad- cast sowing. In countries where it is customary to sow red clover with the small grains, it has been noticed that the clover is thriftier and less injured by hot weather when the rows made by the grain drill extend north and south rather than east and west. 21. The open-furrow method of drilling oats. — This consists in sowing the seed, not with a two-horse grain drill, but with a one-horse planter, which deposits the seed in the bottom of a deep furrow or trench previously opened by a large shovel plow. The seeds are barely covered by the small amount of soil which falls into the trench as the planter passes along. Therefore, the plants grow from the bottom of a rather deep furrow which remains unfilled throughout the winter. Here they are somewhat protected from cold and greatly protected from heaving, since the soil and the plants in the bottom of a furrow are not easily lifted by alternate freezing and thawing. These deep furrows are 18 to 24 inches apart. Fertil- izer is drilled in with the seed. An incidental advantage of the open-furrow method is the fact that it permits thorough harrowing in early spring. This affords all the usual advantages of cultivation and partially fills the open furrows so as to make easier the operation of the binder or mower. At the Alabama and Georgia Experiment Stations, this method has given larger yields than were secured from broadeast sowing, besides almost complete protection from winter-kiling. How- ever, this method is not adapted to very stiff or poorly drained OATS 19 soil. It is also a slow method, but the reported invention of a machine for sowing several rows at one time may possibly over- come this objection. 22. Prevention of winter-killing. — Since Red Rust- proof oats are sometimes thinned, or even killed com- pletely, by cold weather in winter, methods of decreasing this injury are important. Oats are more frequently win- ter-killed on account of heaving, or lifting of the soil and of the young plants when the ground freezes, than from the direct effects of low temperatures. Heaving is due to the expansion in freezing of the water in the soil. Every one has noticed on a frosty morning the little icicles pro- jected upward from a spot of wet clayey land. Often these icicles lift on their summits particles of soil. By this same process of expansion of soil-moisture in freezing, young plants are lifted. This heaving is worst in soils that contain the most water; that is, in clay spots and where the drainage is poor. Means of decreasing winter-killing of oats are: (1) plant- ing in depressions or unfilled furrows (the open-furrow system); (2) improved drainage; (3) selection of hardy varieties or strains; (4) the use of the roller to settle the lifted plants into closer contact with the soil. 23. Quantity of seed. — On account of the ability of the oat plant to throw out an indefinite number of shoots or ‘culms, and thus to utilize whatever space may be avail- able, the thickness of sowing does not directly determine the rate of yield. From 4 to 16 pecks to the acre may be taken as the extreme limits. The quantity of seed usu- ally advisable for broadcast sowing is between 14 and 24 bushels per acre. By using the grain drill, this may 20 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS be reduced by about half a bushel per acre, and the open: furrow method makes possible an even greater reduction. The earlier the date of sowing and the more complete the preparation of the land, the smaller may be the quantity of seed employed. 24, Size of seed. — Scores of experiments have been made to determine the size of seed or grain to sow for the best agricultural results, most of which show a distinct advantage from sowing large or heavy seed. Zavitz secured the following results (American Breeders’ As- sociation, Vol. II, p. 121): — After selecting seed for thirteen years, the large seed being taken each year from the plot sown with large grains, the small grains continuously from the plots sown with small seed, the crop from the large seed yielded 65.5 bushels per acre as compared with 44.7 bushels from the small seed; the crop from the large seed weighed 35.5 pounds per bushel as compared with 24.3 pounds per bushel from the continuous sowing of light seed. The deterioration due to sowing poor seed is still better shown by the fact that the crop from the large seed required only 1149 grains to weigh an ounce while that from the light seed required 2066 grains. Among the publications summarizing the experiments on this point are the following : — Nebraska Expr. Station Bull. 104. Ohio Expr. Station Bull. 38. Kansas Expr. Station Bull. 74. Canada Expr. Farms, Rpt. 1901. ; Ontario Agr. College and Expr. Farms, Rpt. 1903. 25. Separation of grains by fanning. — It should be borne in mind that there is a tendency for any one oat plant to bear as many heavy seeds as light seeds. This is because each spikelet usually matures one large and one OATS 21 small grain. Hence separation by fanning machines tends to place among the large seeds and among the small seeds, grains from the same parent plants. This indicates that for most rapid improvement of the oat, reliance cannot be placed chiefly on selection by the use of the fanning machine, but rather on the selection of individual plants. However, seed oats should be fanned for the following reasons: (1) to eliminate many grass and weed seeds; (2) to remove those oat grains that are too light to germi- nate or to make vigorous plants ; (3) to decrease the danger of clogging the grain drill with broken straw and trash and beards, especially in the Red Rust-proof variety. 26. Change of seed. — There is a widespread belief that some indefinite and mysterious advantage results from changing the seed of almost any crop. In the case of oats, all available evidence is against this notion and seems to indicate that the varieties do not ‘ run-out,” or degen- erate, from being grown continuously in any part of the cotton-belt. Oats grown in the locality where they are to be planted are best for sowing. The advantages of home-grown seed are usually the following : (1) A yield equal or superior to that secured from seed grown in a different latitude. (2) The ability to select a strain of seed adapted to fall sowing, whereas the seed obtained from other localities is frequently from a spring-sown strain, and hence less able to escape winter-killing. (3) Greater freedom of home- grown oats from admixture with seed of Johnson-grass or noxious weeds that might be introduced from abroad. In itself there seems to be no virtue in changing seed. How- ever, a farmer should not hesitate to change seed to procure an- other strain grown in the same latitude, if his own seed is espe- cially light or poor; or if, by changing seed, he can secure a better or purer variety suited to his soil or climate. 22, SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 27. Cultivation or inter-tillage of oats. — It is unusual to till oats after germination occurs. It is probable that in the South, especially on soils inclined to bake, it will be generally advantageous to harrow drilled oats. Harrow- ing is seldom injurious to the stand of oats sown with the grain drill and not at all hurtful to the stand of oats sown in open furrows. But few tests have been made to determine whether inter- tillage of small grains is profitable. At the Nebraska Experiment Station (Bulletin No. 104) the yield of oats sown with a grain drill was increased by harrowing, in three dry years out of five. With oats sown broadcast, harrowing reduced the yield every year, because it thinned the stand. Drilled oats, tilled, yielded more grain than broadeast oats without tillage. At the same station the yield on the harrowed plots decreased as the space between rows was widened from 6 to 12, 18, and 24 inches. 28. Pasturing oats. — During periods when the soil is so dry as to be uninjured in its mechanical condition by the tramping of live-stock, there may be no harm in pasturing oats intended for grain. Cautions to be observed in pasturing any small grains are: (1) Keeping the stock off the land while wet ; (2) dis- continuing pasturage early enough to afford abundant time for the plants to tiller and head; (3) avoidance of pasturing too closely while there is danger of severe freezes. For oats sown rather early in the fall, pasturing may be a distinct advantage in preventing the formation of stems while there is still danger of freezing weather, which would be especially injurious to oats in the ‘ booting ” stage, that is, after the stems have begun to lengthen rapidly. OATS ENEMIES 29. Weeds. — The same weeds are troublesome in oats as in wheat. Chief among these is cheat or chess. The use of clean seed, that has been carefully fanned and screened, is the best means of avoiding weed pests. In purchasing seed oats, care should be taken that they con- tain no seed of Johnson-grass. 30. Fungous diseases. of oats. — Chief among diseases caused by fungi is rust, for which there is no treatment. The Red Rust-proof variety and its various strains are the most rust-resistant varieties, but even these are not entirely exempt. Rust is worse in damp weather. Oat smut (Fig. 8). — This disease usually reduces the yield of oats 10 to 20 per cent. Unlike rust, it is entirely under the control of the farmer. It appears as blackened heads in which no grains develop, Lut in the place of which are Fic. 8.— Oats DESTROYED BY Smut. 24 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS conspicuous masses of black, powdery material or spores. These spores answer the purpose of seed in carrying smut to the next crop of oats. This particular fungus originates from a tiny spore (or particle of black dust) which has found its way during ripening, or harvesting or threshing to the seed grain. The fungus grows in the form of threads through the entire length of the oat plant and finally bears what may be called its fruit or spores at the time of heading. To prevent smut, all that is necessary is to destroy the life of the tiny spore that may have found lodgment on the surface of the seed grain. There are several methods, the simplest and most convenient of which is the formalin treatment, the directions for which follow :— For each three gallons of water add one ounce of formalin. With this liquid, wet or thoroughly moisten the seed, either by dipping the sacks of grain or by thoroughly sprinkling the seed while it is being stirred. Then leave the damp seed in a pile for at least two hours, covering it meantime with a sheet, or old carpet, which has also been dipped in this liquid. The pur- pose in thus covering the pile is to enable the vapors formed by the evaporation of the formalin to completely envelop every seed. Dry the oats before sowing them, and do not let them come in contact with old sacks or floors that have not been disinfected with formalin. Another method of entirely preventing smut in oats is by the hot-water treatment : — Dip the bags of seed oats into a vessel of water kept constantly at a temperature of about 133° F. and always between 130° and 135°. Keep the seed in this hot water for ten minutes. It may then be cooled by being dipped in cold water, or it may be spread out to dry. The temperature of the hot water is most conveniently kept at a constant point by the addition of cold OATS or hot water as required, and by first heating the oats for a few minutes in warm water at about 120° F.; for if the cold seed were dipped into water at 133°, they would too rapidly lower its temperature. This method requires the use of an accurate thermometer. 31. Insect pests. — Insects are the same as those of wheat, ex- cept that the oat is not attacked by the Hessian fly, and that granary insects do less harm to the oat grain, protected as it is by its enveloping hull. A serious pest of the oat plant in the West and Southwest is the green-bug (Toxoptera graminum, Fig. 9). Fic. 9.—Green-bua (Tor- optera graminum) ; WING- LESS ADULT. Greatly enlarged. (After S. J. Hunter.) The green-bug is a plant-louse of green color and very small size, that sucks the juices from the young plant. Fic. 10.— Two Straces or a Lany- BUG WHICH DESTROYS ‘‘ GREEN- BUGS.” Right, adult beetle; left, larva. Enlarged. (After 8S. J. Hunter.) It has many natural enemies which, after the early cool part of the season, usually keep it in subjection. One of these enemies, a lady-bug beetle (Fig. 10), has sometimes been artificially bred and dis- tributed as a means of com- bating the green-bug, especially before the weather has become warm enough to bring forth naturally many of the enemies of this pest. Another parasite on this plant- louse is a tiny four-winged insect 26 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS which lays its eggs in the body of the green-bug, where they hatch and kill the host. 32. Harvesting and marketing. — Oat erains mature from the top of the panicle downward. Most of the grains should change color and be in the late dough stage, or riper, before being harvested for grain. The harvesting of oats is done with the self-binder or the mowing machine, or on small areas of rough land with the grain cradle. It is an advantage in threshing if the grain is tied in bundles, as is done by the self-binder or by laborers following the cradler. Oats are marketed without any special preparation beyond that of sacking. It is customary in some communities for oats to be bound into bundles and shocked, left for a week or more in the shocks, and then stored for several weeks in a stack or barn before being threshed; however, oats are often handled directly from the shock to the threshing machine. Damp or rainy weather during threshing renders this operation slower and more incomplete. 33. Yields. — For the first few years in the twentieth century the world’s oat crop averaged approximately 3,900,000,000 bushels, of which more than one fourth was produced in the United States, on about 28,000,000 acres. The average for the United States is usually between 30 and 35 bushels per acre. This yield is much below that in Germany and Great Britain. For oats sown in the fall in the ecotton-belt a yield of less than 20 bushels may be regarded as poor; of 20 to 30 bushels as fair; and a good yield is one exceeding 40 bushels per acre. A medium yield of oat hay is about one ton per acre, which may be greatly increased by the liberal use of nitrate of soda or by sowing seed of hairy veteh or crimson OATS 27 Fic. 11.— Grains GROWN WITH CRIMSON CLOVER FOR FORAGE AT ALABAMA EXPERIMENT STATION. On left, oats; on right, wheat. 28 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS clover with the seed oats in September or Octobe1 (Fig. 11). For oats sown after Christmas in the Gulf States the yields may be taken as not quite two thirds of the figures for fall-sown oats on the same land. In several instances yields of more than 100 bushels per acre have been reported in the Southern States. At the Alabama Experiment Station on poor, sandy loam soil the yield averaged about one and one half times as many bushels of fall-sown oats as of corn similarly fertilized. Considering that oats weigh 32 pounds per bushel, as compared with 56 pounds per bushel of corn, there was nearly an equal weight of grain produced whether the crop was corn or oats. In the case of a medium yield of Red Rust-proof oats there is about one pound of straw for each pound of threshed grain. That is, a yield of 32 bushels of oats, weighing 960 pounds, is usually accompanied by a yield of about half a ton of straw. 34. Teams and labor for oat culture. — The oat crop requires little expenditure for hand labor. Machinery and horse tools perform most of the work. By sowing oats in the fall, the farm teams are kept employed at a time when, on cotton-farms, there is usually no large amount of other work for them. However, the date of harvesting occurs during the busy season when teams and laborers are needed in the early tilling of cotton and the tillage of corn. Therefore any farm on which a consider- able proportion of the acreage is devoted to oats should be well stocked with teams and so situated that additional laborers can be hired for a few days during harvest. When additional day labor cannot be hired to shock a large area of oats in a brief time, the harvest season can be spread out over a longer period by sowing a part of the OATS 29 area in Red Rust-proof oats and a part in some variety ripening either earlier or later. LABORATORY EXERCISES Young plants in the field. , (1) From a number of plants of wheat, oats, rye, and barley, pulled and mixed together, separate all the oat plants by the ab- sence of clasps (auricles) on the leaves. Repeat until young oat plants are readily recognized. (2) With specimens used in (1) or growing in the field, write out other means of distinguishing leaves of oats from those of each of the other small grains. (3) Compare several varieties of oats, if available, as to differ- ences in appearance of the young plants. (4) Dig four young plants sprung from seed buried deeply and four others from seed lightly covered; record for each plant of each class the length of that section of root between the parent grain and the crown, or place where most stems originate. Examination of bloom. (5) Pinch off the smaller flower in a spikelet, and treat the larger as follows: With pin or small forceps open the incurved transparent inner hull, or palet, before the pollen has been shed, and make a drawing, showing the number and position of stamens and stigmas. Crossing oat flowers. (6) If practicable to execute No. (5) at 8 to 10 a.M., practice opening several flowers in such a way as to give least injury to the transparent inner covering or palet; when successful, remove with a pin the three unopened anthers; carefully replace the palet; cover with a very small paper bag; about 5 in the after- noon of the same day reopen the same flower and insert on the stigmas an anther that shows loose grains of pollen; replace the palet, and a week later note whether a crossed grain has formed. Repeat this exercise several times. 30 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Smut. (7) Insert a barrel hoop, or sides of a bottomless box, over a number of oat plants in the field; count the number of smutted and healthy heads; calculate the percentage of smutted heads, and the apparent loss per acre from smut if the yield of the field would have been thirty bushels per acre had there been no smut. The oat panicle and stems. (8) Compare the form of panicle of Red Rust-proof oats with that of Burt or Turf oats. (9) Record the number of whorls (sets of branches) and the number of spikelets in each of five heads of oats. (10) Record the total number of stems of ten plants with abun- dant room and of ten plants in a part of the field where the plants are thick. Samples of threshed seed. (11) Carry out directions for prevention of smut by the for- malin treatment (paragraph 30). (12) Practice the hot-water treatment for smut. (13) Save some seed in both treatments above and make a ger- mination test, in soil or in germinating box, of 100 seeds treated with formalin, 100 with hot water, and 100 not treated. (14) Make a germination test of 100 small seeds from upper grains of spikelets and of 100 large grains, each of the latter being the lower grain of its spikelet; notice results in 7 or 14 days as to percentage of germinated seed and character of sprouts or young plants. (In a good sample, 97 per cent should germinate. ) (15) Note all differences between seeds of Red Rust-proof, Burt, and Turf types of oats. (16) Make drawings of a spikelet of Red Rust-proof freed of chaff, showing number and position of beards. Do likewise for some other variety. (17) Determine the weight of a measured bushel of several samples of oats, by weighing a gallon or peck. OATS 31 Scoring. (18) Score as many samples of threshed oats as practicable, by the following score-card : — 1. Trueness to type . UE Bea oO 2. Uniformity of kernel in size and shape oa Aare ce S10 3. Purity of color. «a UTS 4. Cleanliness, or freedom from weed seeds, trash, eters % 10 5. Seed condition, or Senains POWwer- Ss) slots “Ge se 15 6. Proportion of hull . . Ses ae et cas ee cou eee DLO) #. Weight-per bushel: 4: 3. (2 js: ay ce ep ee A Ger 2. Potalspoimts! 2: 4. ek. 2a fe Ge es An ay Bo ce ds, LOO LITERATURE Cultural Methods. Ducear, J. F. Ala. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 137. Reppinc, R. J. Ga. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 44 and 72. Ten Eycx, A. M., and SHorsmirH, V. M. Kan. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 144. Composition. Prrer, A. M. Ky. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 99. Storer, F. H. Agriculture in its Relation to Chemistry, Vol. IL, p. 400. Breeding. Norton, J. B. Am. Breeders’ Assen., Vol. III, pp. 280-285. Score-card. Lyon and Montcomery. Examining and Grading Grains. Lincoln, Neb. Ten Eycx, A. M. Kan. Agr. Col., 1907. Rules for Judging and Grading Small Grains. Enemies: Green-bug. Honter, S. J., in Kan. Bd. Agr., 1907. U.S. Bur. Entomology, Bul. No. 38, and Cires. 81, 85, and 93. CHAPTER II WHEAT — TRITICUM SATIVUM Wueart belongs to the grass family, and is thus closely related to all the other cereal grains and to the forage grasses. All the various wheats are included in the genus Triticum, which term thus forms the first word in the bo- tanical name of wheat. All kinds of wheat are annuals. Wheat is chiefly used for the manufacture of flour. From the wheat grain are also made breakfast foods, mac- aroni, and other articles for human nourishment. When the price of wheat is low, the grain is sometimes fed to all classes of live-stock. It is especially prized as a food for poultry. The wheat plant affords valuable winter pasturage, and when cut before ripening, it makes hay of good quality. For use as hay a variety having no beards is, of course, preferable. In the southern parts of the Gulf States, wheat is more valued for forage than for grain. STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION 35. Roots. — The wheat has fibrous roots, and in this respect it is entirely unlike such plants as the legumes, cow- peas, clovers and cotton, which have tap-roots. The roots of wheat do not extend so widely as do those of corn and cotton. The roots originate at the crown, which is usually 32 WHEAT 83 within an inch of the surface of the ground, whatever may have been the depth of planting. However, before the crown and the main or permanent system of roots are formed, three short temporary roots develop from the sprouted grain; thus the depth of these temporary roots depends upon the depth oi planting. They serve no further use after the development of the numerous permanent roots originating chiefly at the crown. Hence, the depth at which the wheat roots and feeds is independent of the depth at which the seed is sown. 36. Stems. — The stems or culms of wheat are hollow, with closed or solid joints. The usual height is three to five feet. When the straw grows to great length, there is danger that the plant may “ lodge ” (fall), thus interfering with the perfect development of the grain and making har- vesting difficult and incomplete. As a rule, wheat grows taller than barley and not so tall as rye. The weight of straw is usually nearly twice the weight of grain, but it may vary widely from this. A single wheat grain may give rise directly to a single culm and indirectly to a score or more of stems, as explained below. The buds at the lower nodes (joints) of each culm may themselves develop into additional culms, and from the lower nodes of these still other stems may spring. This formation of culms from lower buds at the underground nodes of each stem explains how and why wheat and other small grains tiller; that is, they produce a number of stems from a single seed. The greater the space between plants and the greater the rainfall and supply of plant- food, the greater is the number of culms from a single crown. » sD 4 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS € 37. Leaves. — The leaves of wheat vary in width, and even in the shade of green. Asa rule, they are narrower than the leaves of barley and oats. Young wheat plants of the species usually cultivated in the United States (Triticum sativum) may be distinguished easily from those of the other small grains by the two small clasps (auricles) that partly en- circle the stem where the blade, or free part of each leaf, unites with the sheath (Fig. 12). In Pre. 12.--Paax or a Yours the young wheat plant these Wueat Puanr. clasps bear on their margins a Showing clasps bordered with few very inconspicuous hairs. meee No hairs occur on the larger clasps of barley nor on the smaller auricles of rye. Oats have no auricles. Young plants of the four small grains, therefore, may be dis- tinguished by the following leaf characters, as well as by others :— Oats have no auricles or clasps (Fig. 1). Rye has very small auricles (Fig. 23). Barley leaves are provided with large auricles (Fig. 28). Wheat has auricles intermediate in size between those of rye and barley, and on the outer margin of each auricle on American wheats are a few hairs (Fig. 12). 38. Pollination. — Although wanting in showy colors, the part from which each wheat grain develops is a true flower. On carefully opening the husk-like inclosing parts in a newly formed head of wheat, within each flower are found three XS WHEAT 30 G stamens, which soon afford the yellow powder or pollen. There is also a pair of small glistening plumes (Fig. 13), corresponding to the silks in corn. These are the stigmas or divisions of the pistil, and in these delicate plumes the pollen must lodge and grow before a seed can form. The plume-like stigmas are snugly inclosed by the chaff, thus preventing the access of any pollen except that which develops within the same flower. Hence wheat is a Fic. 13.— FuLoret oF ; WHEAT. self-pollinated plant. Therefore, Showing two stigmas and See i two of the three anthers. two varieties of wheat sown side by side do not cross or mix, unless the seed be mechanically mixed by careless handling. Two varieties of wheat can be crossed or hybridized by removing the pollen-cases (anthers) before they burst, and then, a little later, by applying to the stigmas pollen from a plant on which the anthers have just set free the pollen. The best time for hybridizing wheat is before daybreak. 39. The spike and the spikelets. — ‘‘Spike”’ is the name given to the entire head of wheat, and spikelet is the name of a group of flowers or grains springing from the same place onthe stem. The head or spike is borne at the top of each completely developed stem or straw. In wheat there is only one spikelet, or flower-cluster, at each node or joint.’ The spikelets are arranged alternately on the zigzag stem (orrachis). The spikelets are arranged flatwise to the stem. 36 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS The shape of the spike differs in certain species and va- rieties of wheat and may be (1) tapering, or (2) nearly uniform in size, or (3) club-shaped (that is, decidedly Pic. 14.—A Heap, SprkeLet, and GRAIN OF BrearpDED WHear. largest at the extreme upper end) (Fig. 17). The shape of the spike or head cepends largely on the size to which the spikelets in different parts of the spike develop. Comprising each spikelet are usually three or more flowers (Fig. 14). From them, when all conditions are favorable, may develop three grains. More fre- quently, only two flowers develop, and the spikelet yields only two grains, sometimes only one. o SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (a) Prevailing color, — whitish, amber, or reddish. (b) Hard, medium, or soft, in crushing. (c) Plump, shriveled, or medium-plump. (d) Size of grain, — large, medium, or small. (e) Crease, — deep, medium, or shallow. (10) Standards for wheat grown in the South have not been agreed on. Until this is done, the following standard for Fultz wheat used in Kansas may prove a useful basis for the formu- lation of Southern standards. Fultz. Type: red, soft, winter. Length of berry : inches, 35 to #5. Thickness of berry : inches, 34 to +4. Shape and plumpness: very plump, rounded sides; shallow groove. Moisture content: per cent, 10. Weight per bushel: pounds, 60. Percentage of soft grains, 90. Practice scoring wheat grain by the following score-card, or such modification of it as the instructor may direct :— Dees | | | Depuct | | | PERFECT |roR EACH | Score | °% UNDE- 1} 2 3°] 4 5 1. Trueness to variety | 2. Uniformity in size and | shape of kernel | 3. Color of grain 4. Freedom from mixture with other grain 5. Size of kernel 6. Per cent and nature of weed seed, dirt, ete. 7. Per cent of damaged, smutty,ormusty kernels 8. Weight of grain per bu. | 9. Germination Total WHEAT 67 LITERATURE Brsspy,C. E. The Structure of the Wheat Grain. Neb. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 32. Kizcore, B. W., and others. Culture and Variety Tests of Wheat. N.C. Dept. Agr. Bul., Vol. 30, No. 8, Aug. 1909. Hunt, Tuomas F. The Cereals in America. New York, 1908. Exuiott, EK. E., and Lyon, T. L. Wheat. Bailey’s Cyclo. Am. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 660-670. Carteton, M.A. The Basis for the Improvement of American Wheats. U.S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Phys. and Path., Bul. No. 24. Caruteton, M. A., and others. Field Methods in Breeding Wheat. Am. Breeders’ Assen., Vol. V, pp. 185-207. Scorretp, Cart 8S. The Description of Wheat Varieties. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Plant Ind., Bul. No. 27. Hays, Wittett M. Plant Breeding. U.S. Dept. Agr., Div. of Veg. Phys. and Path., Bul. No. 29. Souter, A. M., and Vanatter, P. O. Tenn. Expr. Sta. Bul., Vol. 14, No. 3, and Vol. 16, No. 4. Lyon, T. L. Improving the Quality of Wheat. U. 8S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Plant Ind., Bul. No. 78. } Lyon and Montcomery. Examining and Grading Grains, Lincoln, Neb. Donpuincer, P. T. Book of Wheat. New York, 1908. CHAPTER III RYE AND BARLEY Rye and barley are not more closely related than the other small grains treated in this book, but they are thrown together in one chapter because they are relatively unimportant in the South. Rye is a cool-season crop, whereas north of the cotton-belt barley is a warm-season crop. Both are members of the grass family (Graminee). I. RYE—SECALE CEREALE Rye is an annual winter-growing grain. The acreage in the South is very small compared with that of oats or wheat. The chief use of rye in the South is for pasturage and for soiling (that is, to be used as cut green food). Other uses of various parts of the plant are the following: The grain is used in the manufacture of alcoholic liquors ; it is utilized to a small extent in this country for human food and as a food for live-stock. The straw commands a higher price than that of any of the other small grains. Its prin- cipal use is for bedding; for the manufacture of horse collars; and as packing material. Most of the rye grain threshed in the Southern States is used as seed for the succeeding crop. The rye plant makes hay of very poor quality. 68. Description. — The grain of rye, like that of wheat, has no adhering hull after it has passed through the thresher. 68 RYE AND BARLEY 69 It may be distinguished from a wheat grain by the longer, slenderer, more wrinkled appear- ance, and by the fact that the crease is more shallow. The head of rye (Fig. 23) is longer than that of wheat or barley, and long beards are borne on the tips of the glumes. The heads are usually slightly flat- tened, the beards heing arranged loosely in two rows and not spreading so widely as in bearded wheat and barley. The young plant of rye may be distinguished from young wheat and barley by the very small auricles at the points where leaf-blade. and leaf-sheath join (Fig. 24). Young rye plants usu- ally show considerable reddish color in the stem, and the foliage Fic. 23.— Heaps oF SouTHERN RYE 70 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS is commonly of a grayer green than that of the other small grains. 69. Varieties. — There is but a limited number of vari- eties of rye, even in European countries. Practically only one kind or variety is successfully and generally grown in the warmer portion of the South, which is known simply as Southern rye. The rye flower, unlike that of wheat, oats, and barley, is cross-pol- linated, so that it would not be desir- able to sow two different varieties near together. 70. Climate. — The rye plant is fs adapted to a wide range of climate. Fic. 24.—Parr or a It is hardier towards cold than any of Youna Rye Pant, the other small grains and is practi- SHOWING THE SMALL peat A = Clasps or tHe cally never injured in the South by Leaves. winter-killing. Rye can be sown suc- cessfully in a latitude too far south for general success with wheat. However, in growing rye in the South it is very important to use seed grown as far south as practicable. It is thought that seed from the central and lower parts of the Gulf States is better for sowing in the South than that from the extreme northern parts of the same states, and far better than that from still higher latitudes. North- ern rye spreads out so closely on the ground that it does not afford the best early winter pasturage, and seed from higher latitudes produces a smaller plant that is more subject to rust than Southern rye. 71. Soils and fertilizers. — Rye can be grown on almost RYE AND BARLEY 71 any soil, provided it be fairly well drained. It has been found to endure a greater amount of acidity in the soil than oats, wheat, or barley plants. (R.I. Expr. Sta., Rpt. 1907, p. 359.) While rye will grow on poor soils, it is possible to make large yields of forage only on rich or highly fertilized land. With rye intended for soiling, a liberal use of stable manure constitutes the best fertilization. If commercial fertilizers alone must be used, it is usually advisable to apply acid phosphate; in addition cotton-seed meal may be applied at the time of planting and not in contact with the seed, or else nitrate of soda may be employed as a top dressing before the stems have formed. On very sandy soils there may be need for a small amount of potash. 72. Preparation and sowing. — Rye may be sown either (1) broadcast, or (2) in drills 6 or 8 inches apart by the use of a grain drill, or (3) it may be sown by hand or planter in drills 18 to 24 inches apart. For soiling purposes it is preferable to sow in drills, but for grazing, broadcast sowing is the most common. Rye may be sown through a longer period than any of the other small grains. September 1 is not too early for a sowing on rich land with the purpose of furnishing soiling food in December, January, and February. Sowings may be made at intervals throughout the fall and even up to December 15, the later sowing making a smaller yield. When sown broadcast, the amount of seed needed for grain production is 4 to 5 pecks per acre, and for pas- turage 6 to 8 pecks. In planting rye in 18-inch drills, one bushel per acre is usually sufficient. For pasturage, rye may be sown with crimson clover (Fig. 25) or with other winter-growing legumes. 72 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Fic. 25.—A Mixture or Rye anp CRIMSON CLOVER. Showing the height to which rye grows. 73. Utilization. — On rich land rye sown early in the fall may be cut three or even four times as a soiling crop, the first cutting being made in December or January. In order to secure several cuttings, the plant must be cut just RYE AND BARLEY 73 before the heads appear. - The later the sowing and the poorer the land the later the date at which rye can first be used as a soiling crop. Under average conditions this is from February 15, to March 15 in the central part of the Gulf States. Southern rye is somewhat earlier in matur- ing than most varieties of wheat or oats. Rye for pasturage must be kept rather closely grazed in the spring or else some of the plants will develop tall stems, and in this condition these plants will not be readily eaten by live-stock. Rye for grain may be harvested with a self-binder, or if too long for this, with a self-rake reaper. There is usually about twice the weight of straw as of grain. Good yields in the South are from 10 to 18 bushels per acre. If rye straw is to be sold at the highest price in the Northern cities, it should be threshed on a special machine or rye beater. This does not tangle the straw, which is subsequently bound into bundles and baled in a special press, for which doubtless an ordinary cotton press could be substituted. 74, Enemies. — Rye, like wheat, is in- jured by the Hessian fly, but has a smaller p46 94 —Ereot number of insect enemies than most grains. =! A Heap or Among its fungous diseases is ergot (Fig. ae 26), which causes the affected grains to enlarge and project conspicuously from the head, such grain constituting a poi- sonous food. Preventive measures consist in avoiding the use of seed rye containing such diseased grains and in sowing 74 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS rye on a field where there has not before been ergot on rye, nor on any of the related wild grasses. Fortunately, ergot is not very common in the South. Il. BARLEY — HORDEUM SATIVUM Barley is an annual grain of comparatively slight im- portance in the cotton-belt. In regions where it is grown for seed production, the grain is utilized chiefly in the pro- duction of beer, and great pains is taken to produce a grain of the highest quality and free from weather stain or other injury. i,| The chief use of barley in the South is for pasturage and as a soiling plant. WY) It is sown in the same way as rye. iW . Green barley is considered to be more i| | | palatable than pastures of any of the Wy), other small grains, but the amount of | pasturage per acre is usually smaller than that from rye. 75. Description. — Barley has the Ss GEE ——— LE tale i! Ww shortest straw of any of the small iY) grains. The heads are usually armed NY) with strong, long, spreading beards, i | that grow from the tips of the glumes Cy | (Fig. 27). In spite of this objection, Wy barley is used in California as a hay Xu) plant, but its use necessitates the SA frequent removal of the beards from the gums of the horses consuming it. Fic. 27.—A Heap anp Len pha ‘ : Grains or Baanpep _He Clasps at the junction of leaf- Baruey. sheath and leaf-blade are larger on RYE AND BARLEY 75 the barley plant than on any other of the small grains (Fig. 28). The hull of the barley grain grows tight to the kernel, and the grain, instead of ;3 being roundish, as in oats, has a dis- tinctly ribbed or angular appearance. The weight of barley is 48 pounds per bushel. 76. Composition. — The following figures are quoted from H. R. Smith’s “Profitable Stock Feeding’”’ to show the relative composition of the seed or grain py.08 Tur Larce of barley, rye, wheat, oats, and Indian Craspsor Bartey corn: — Lear. CRUDE CaRBO- Fs y PROTEL | Fat FIsER HYDRATES Barley; etain=s a. as-e—:5 9-43) T2Ac 8") 228 69.8 Ryespraim ¢. 2 6 [5- 2. eae |) LOG er a? 72.5 Wheat.prain s 2. 4 «4 = «= +) 120° |-2.0-) 2:0 Ged Oats; ram's. 2-4 eee a ee A820") O55 | 59.7 Com, dent: .- 2 < «6. «x 5) 10:3> 15.0") 232) | “704 These figures show that barley is a nutritious grain. In cooler countries where its yield is greater than in the South it is prized as a food for hogs, since it produces a firm and excellent quality of pork. 77. Species and varieties. — Some authorities divide barley into several species, depending on whether the grains are arranged in 2, 4, or 6 rows, thus giving the name of 2-rowed, 4-rowed, and 6-rowed barley. There is also 76 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS a form of naked barley in which the hulls do not adhere to the kernels; unfortunately, the yield of this kind is small. Beardless barley has excited some interest. Its chief ad- vantage is its earliness and the absence of beards (Fig. 29). Its disadvantages are small yield of grain, weak straw, small number of stems produced, and extreme tenderness, or susceptibility to winter-killing. Even in the central part of the Gulf States this variety requires sowing after Christmas. It is the earliest of any of the small grains tested at the Alabama Ex- periment Station, but is scarcely practicable except on a small scale and on rich land. 78. Soils and fertilizers. — Barley requires a richer soil than any of the other small grains. It prefers a limestone soil, and on acid lands the use of lime is usually advan- tageous. The fertilizer should be either stable manure or a mixture of commercial fertilizers containing nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash. 79. Sowing. —In the central part of the cotton-belt, barley may be sown at any date between September 1 and December 1. For sowing broadcast to afford pasturage it is advisable to use 2% bushels of seed per acre. For grain production, or for sowing in drills as a soiling crop, 1} to 2 bushels per acre is sufficient. Fic. 29. — Heap ANnp SPrKe- LET OF BEARDLESS BARLEY. RYE AND BARLEY | 77 80. Enemies. — Since barley is the first of the small grains to ripen, it is devoured by birds. It is subject to two kinds of smut. For the prevention of the loose smut of barley, evidenced by conspicuous black heads, without grain, the Wisconsin Experiment Station recommends the following treatment of the seed: ‘Soak for 12 hours in cold water; then scald the seed at 130° F., for not over 6 minutes. Sow the seed the same day.” LABORATORY EXERCISES (1) Make a drawing of a spikelet of rye. (2) Make a drawing of a spikelet of barley. (3) Practice the separation of a mixture of grains of barley, rye, wheat, and oats. (4) Write out the two most conspicuous differences between a head of rye and one of barley ; the one most conspicuous dif- ference between a head of bearded wheat and of bearded barley. LITERATURE Rye. Kiucore, B. W., and others. N.C. Dept. Agr., Bul. Vol. 30, No. 8. Van Waceman,J., Jr. Bailey’s Cyclo. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 559-563. SarGent, F. L. Corn Plants. Boston. Barley. Sarcent, F. L. Corn Plants. Boston. Moore, R. A. Bailey’s Cyclo. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 202-206. CHAPTER IV CORN OR MAIZE (Zea Mays) —STRUCTURE Corn belongs to the great family of grasses, which also includes, besides the ordinary grasses, sorghum, sugar-cane, and the small grains. It is a large annual plant, making its growth in the warmer part of the year and is easily killed by freezing temperatures. The word ‘‘ corn”’ in Europe means any kind of grain. In the United States, the word applies only to Indian corn or maize. Most authorities think that this plant originated in the southern part of Mexico. It has few near relatives among either wild or cultivated plants. Its nearest cul- tivated relative is teosinte, a tropical forage plant which is of some value in the southern part of the United States. Corn is the largest and most valuable single crop grown in the United States, occupying more than twice the acre- age devoted to wheat and three times that occupied by cotton. Its most important use is as a food for live-stock, for which both the grain and all parts of the vegetative portion of the plant are employed. Corn also constitutes an important article of human food. In the South corn-bread is largely consumed, and in all parts of the United States numerous other articles for human consumption are made from the corn grain, such as breakfast foods and cornstarch. The oil extracted 38 80 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS from the grain is used as a lubricant and for the manufac: ture of a substitute for rubber. The pith from the stalk is employed as a packing material in the construction of warships. Corn and its by-products are also used in many other ways. STRUCTURE 81. Roots. — The root system of the corn plant con- sists of a number of long, slender, branched, fibrous roots. There is no tap-root. A whorl of roots develops near the germinating grain, but the main system springs from the crown of the plant, which usually develops about 1 inch below the surface. Therefore, the depth of rooting of corn is largely independent of the depth at which the grain is planted. As a rule, most of the main feeding roots originate in the stratum comprised between 2 inches and 4 inches below the surface of the ground (Figs. 80 and 31). These usually grow out almost horizontally for some distance, and then, if the soil permits, many of them bend down- ward, while some of the smaller, secondary roots occupy the surface layer of soil. Corn roots do not penetrate so deeply in most Southern soils as in other parts of the country. The depth at which roots feed seems to depend chiefly on the supply of moisture and air in the soil. The roots of corn are frequently as long as the plant is tall. Indeed, the roots may lap across the rows before the plant is 1 foot high, so that deep cultivation, even at this early stage, may break many roots. Besides the feeding roots just mentioned, the corn plant usually develops, at the first few nodes or joints Just above > 1 : , i" Xt a , e io ad + GG 4 le Roots or Corn 47 Days ArreER PLANTING IN Dupe Furrows. — SHOWING 2y ol. Via. $1 a 82 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS the surface, a series of brace-roots (Fig. 32). These slope downward and outward, and on reaching the soil they serve the purpose of bracing the plant. On enter- ing the soil, the brace- roots become smaller and helpto supply the plant with food and water. 82. Stem.— The stem of the corn plant is solid or filled with pith, and tapers to the top. The usual height is 5 to 15 feet. A height above 10 feet is probably an indication of wasted Fic. 32.— BRACE-ROOTS ON THE CorN PLANT. On the paper at the bottom of the picture are two detached brace-roots, showing how they branch in the soil. energy, the proportion of stem being larger than necessary to the production of the maximum amount of grain. Since the corn plant must stand much strain from wind, it is so constructed as to resist or escape or withstand wind pressure. For example, devices for this purpose are found in the tapering stem, the presence of brace-roots, the strength of the outer layer or rind, the solid partitions at the nodes, and the peculiar form of the leaf. CORN STRUCTURE 83 The stem consists of internodes of variable length, separated by solid partitions at the nodes or joints. The internodes on certain parts of the plant are grooved, which seems to be a pro- vision for accommodating the shank, or ear branch. When shoots or ears arise, they spring from a bud at the base of this groove. This bud is completely enwrapped by the leaf-sheath, which serves to protect it. Under some conditions, partly dependent on variety, character of season, and distance between plants, ‘“‘suckers’’ or basal branches spring from the buds on-the main stem near the crown. These suckers afterwards develop independent root systems. Removal of such suckers is an important cultural operation in the South, since they take up water and plant-food needed by the parent plant. Their removal from Northern corn-fields is less im- portant, for there several plants may be safely grown in each hill. The tendency of individual corn plants to sucker is hereditary ; thus Hartley found that when both the male and female parents produced suckers, 14} per cent of the offspring developed suckers; while only 2} per cent of the plants bore suckers in the case of those stalks neither of whose parents had produced suckers. Therefore, in selecting corn plants for seed, preference should ke given in the South to those free from suckers. 83. Leaves. — The corn plant is supplied with a con- siderable number of long, broad, tapering leaves. The number is most frequently twelve to eighteen; and a leafy plant is probably desirable. The main uses or functions of leaves are (1) to take up from the air its carbon dioxid for use in building up the tissues of the plant, and (2) to throw off the surplus water into the air, thus helping to lift other supplies of soil moisture to the leaves with the contained plant-food. For these two purposes, the leaf - is provided with immense numbers of minute openings or pores (stomata). These stomata are especially numer- ous on the under sides of leaves; each pore or stomate is 84 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS provided with an arrangement by which, in dry weather, the size of the opening is reduced, thus decreasing the amount of water thrown off by the leaf. The’ corn leaf has also another means of economizing in the transpiration of moisture. This is seen in the rolling together of leaves in the middle of a hot dry day. This curling, or rolling, of the leaves is due to the presence of special cells, which, on parting with a portion of their moisture in dry weather, cause the leaf to fold inward. In the South, the corn plant is especially liable to lose pre- maturely the use of its leaves through their drying, or ‘‘ firing.” This may be due to dry weather, to inadequate preparation of the soil, to lack of proper cultivation, to root pruning, or to other causes. The leaf consists of two principal parts: the sheath, or that part which is clasped around a portion of the stem, and the blade, Fic. 383.— Parr or a Corn Lear, sHowinc Wavy Marcins. or free part of the leaf. The outer margin of the blade is wavy or scalloped (Fig. 33). This permits the leaf to turn from the wind like a windmill thrown out of gear, and thus to avoid throwing too great a strain on the stem. 84. Ear-branch and shucks. — The shank on which the ear is borne represents a branch. That this is a branch is apparent (1) from its position in the angle between the stem and the leaf-sheath; (2) by the fact that the shank has nodes similar to those of the main stem; and (3) by .CORN STRUCTURE 85 the fact that most of these nodes bear a shuck or husk, which is only a modified leaf, as will readily be seen by noting that many shucks are tipped with a small leaf-blade (Fig. 34). It is supposed that the shank which now bears the ear was once a long branch, and that shortening of the branches occurred both Fic. 34.—An Ear OF CORN ON WHICH LEAF-BLADES ARE BORNE ON THE TIPS OF MANY OF THE SHUCKS. by man’s selection and by natural selection. For example, those plants with shortest branches would be the ones most likely to propagate their kind in nature, because these branches would less frequently break off before maturing the seed. For the same reason, selection by man would also tend to preserve the plants with shortest branches, 86 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 85. Number of ears. — The number of ears to a plant varies greatly, according to the race of corn, the variety, the soil and fertilization, and the character of the season. In the ordinary or dent varieties, the number seldom ex- ceeds seven and is more frequently one or two ears for each plant. Many experiments at the Alabama and North Carolina Experiment Stations have indicated that in the South those varieties of dent corn are most productive of grain that ordinarily bear two ears to the plant. 86. Position of the ear. — Large yields of corn are made from varieties bearing ears at a medium height from the ground, while equally large yields are made from other varieties, the ears of which are borne at a greater distance above the ground. Other things being equal, a moderate height of ear is preferable, say, four feet above the ground in the case of a tall plant, or even less in the case of a low plant (Fig. 35). The chief advantages of a low or medium position of ear are the following: (1) a decreased tend- ency for the ear to pull the plant down, and (2) greater ease in harvesting the ear in the lower position. A low ear is also apt to accompany a stalk of only medium size, which is desirable. A low ear, also, usually implies earlier maturity. The shank of the ear should be of such size and length as to let the ear droop, or bend straight down, so as to protect the tip of the ear from rain and to avoid the tend- ency exerted by an outward-pointing ear to pull down the stalk. This means that the shank should be of medium diameter. It should not be very long. 87. Tassel. — The tassel consists of a panicle, or spread- Fic. 35.— DIFFERENCES IN HEIGHT AND PosITION OF EAR IN THE SaMe VARIETY. On right, ears low and hanging down; next, ears too high; next, ear- shanks too long; on extreme left, the shank is too short and stocky, causing the mature ears to point upward. 87 88 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS ing flower-cluster, usually borne at the extreme top of the plant. This panicle carries the male or pollen-bearing flowers, which are usually in groups of two flowers in a spikelet. Each flower, on maturing, pushes forth three anthers, or pollen cases, from which, on maturing, the fine particles of pollen are set free, to be borne by the wind to the silks of other corn plants. It has been estimated that a single tassel may bear more than 40,000,000 pollen- grains. The tassel usually appears two to four days before the first silks are visible on the same plant; this is a device to prevent the pollination of the silk by the pollen from the same plant. Numerous experiments have shown that the removal of the tassels on half of the plants in a field does not ma- terially influence the yield. 88. Silks. — Each silk originates where a grain should be borne on the cob, from which position it grows until its outer part reaches the air, beyond the tip of the shuck. This free part of the silk is supplied with very minute hairs, the purpose of which is to entangle and hold the grains of pollen. (See Fig. 36, A.) In case a silk fails to receive pollen, it may continue to grow to unusual length. In case no pollen lodges on any particular silk, no grain is formed at the point on the cob where that silk is attached. 89. Pollination. — Pollination is the transfer of pollen to the sticky surface of the stigma, which in this case is the silk. Along the entire length of the silk grows the pollen-tube (Fig. 36), thrown out by the pollen-grain after lodgment on the silk. on co CORN STRUCTURE EMERTO imer INTRGTO INTEGHERT— ~ — _ PERI CARP— —— B Fic. 36.— DIAGRAM SHOWING COURSE OF THE POLLEN-TUBE THROUGH SILK TO OvaRyY. A, section near outer end of silk, showing pollen-grain and pollen-tube ; B, section through base of silk and through young grain. (Drawing by C. S. Ridgway.) The pollination of corn is effected almost entirely by the wind, which may carry the pollen great distances. 90 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Hence, fields of two different varieties of corn, which the farmer desires to keep unmixed, should not be planted at shout the same date, within less than half a mile of each other, unless there be intervening woods or other obstacles to the blowing of the pollen. 90. Impregnation or fertilization of the grain. — The word “‘ fertilization,’ as used in this paragraph, does not refer to the supplying of food or fertilizing material to the plant. Fertilization of the flower consists in the growing of the pollen-tube along the entire length of the silk and into the embryo-sac (Fig. 36), and its union there with the egg-cell of the mother plant to produce the seed (Fig. 37). With- out such a union, no seed is formed. After the pollen-grain has lodged Fic. 37.— Tur Empryo- ‘ , sac IN Corn at rum Othe sticky surface of the protrud- Tims or Fertmization. ing end of the silk, it grows into that pt. pollen-tube which silk and through its entire length to eg ae the point where the silk originates. which, after union with There the pollen-tube enters the ae of the male elements, embryo-sac and sets free two male orms the germ; end., nu- cleus of the endosperm, nuclei. One of these unites with the ae ee ee ee ege-cell, effecting true fertilization (Drawing by F.E. Lloyd.) and producing the germ of the grain; the other male nucleus unites with the nucleus of the endosperm (Fig. 37). When this second union occurs, the result is an endosperm that derives end. CORN STRUCTURE 91 its qualities from the pollen-bearing parent as well as from the mother plant. It is this second union of double fer- tilization, which occurs in some plants, that enables the pollen of a yellow variety of dent corn to produce yellow kernels a few weeks after fertilizing the silks of a white variety. This is because the yellow quality has been given by the male par- ent to the endosperm, or main part of the grain, which color shows as yellow through the transparent hull or bran that covers the grain. 91. The ear. — The ear varies greatly in length, diameter, and number of rows of grain. Among ordinary or dent varie- ties, the usual number of rows ranges between twelve and twenty-four, four- teen to eighteen being most common in productive varieties. A good ear of corn should bear about a thousand grains. The number of rows is always even, a fact which has a satisfactory explanation in the structure and evolution of the cob and pistils. (See Hunt’s ‘‘ Cereals in America,” p. 148.) The best ear is one having a cob not extremely small, since this would not rey} ee r} , Gideon, PP TY) UF} eee Terre ree POPPE rrp iT yyy Y) 800000086860 ETE re 7) Mtl 80084066008 28080 5888068 a ~~» ~~ ™ > > ™ , o se dl - J — ° bd 2 — oad J 3S 5] .] a J a htt.) a! i Fic. 38.— A WeELL- PROPORTIONED Ear or a Harp YELLOW VARIETY. allow a sufficient number of rows. Neither should the cob be very large, since this tends to late maturity and to the rotting of the ear in a wet fall. 92 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Many corn-breeders in the Northern States prefer that the circumference of the ear at one third the distance from the butt be three fourths the length of the ear. However, the best proportions of an ear cannot be regarded as having been determined for Southern varieties (Fig. 38). Tue Corn GRAIN OR KERNEL 92. Shape. — The kernel of corn varies greatly in shape and size with the different races of corn. There are even great differences within the same variety and on the different parts of the same ear. In the dent varieties, practically all of the grains are flattened and somewhat wedge-shaped, their smallest diameter being the one parallel to the cob. Sturtevant found that in each of the races of corn there are grains of three different subtypes :— Subtype A, grain broader than deep ; Subtype B, grain as broad as deep; Subtype C, grain much deeper than broad. The typical grain in the most popular dent varieties has the last shape; that is, it is much deeper or longer than broad. 93. The structure of the grain. — The grain is made up of a number of parts having distinct functions and separate origins. As a means of simplification, these are here grouped into three parts: — (1) the chit, germ, or embryo; (2) the endosperm, or main bulk of the grain ; (3) the seed coats or bran. The embryo, or germ, is situated at the cob end of the CORN STRUCTURE 93 grain, under the depression or groove, which faces the tip of the ear. It comprises about one eighth of the weight of the grain. It is especially rich in fat. The endosperm (from endon, around, and sperma, a seed) is that large portion of the seed lying around and between the embryo and the several outer layers or coats of the ker- nel. The endosperm constitutes about 73 per cent of the weight of the entire grain and is that part of the grain which gives to corn its value as astarchy food. The endo- sperm consists chiefly of starch, but contains also some protein, ash, and other materials. This starch of the endosperm is arranged in two different ways, giving two very different appearances to the different parts of the same endosperm. When this starch is loosely arranged, the color of that part is a pure snow-white, of an opaque floury appearance. On the other hand, when it is arranged in compact form, the appearance is that of a horny or nearly translucent substance, which is called the horny, or corneous layer. The coats of the kernel, which are usually together re- moved in the form of bran, are several in number, each having separate function and origin. 94. Judging the composition of the kernel by its cross- section. — The investigations of Hopkins and of Willard have shown that by cutting transversely through a grain of corn, one may judge of its probable richness in fat, in starch, or in protein, by the thickness of the several layers constituting the germ, the loose floury starch, and the compact horny starch (Fig. 39). A large germ indicates a high percentage of fat, which is important when the corn is used for the manufacture of corn oil. A thick layer of the 94 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS loose floury material indicates a high percentage of starch. Unusual thickness of the horny layer implies a relatively high percentage of protein; this is because this compact layer, though composed chiefly of starch, is also rich in protein. In the selection of seed corn practical use can be made of the facts just mentioned. In spite of these differences in appearance, accompanied by differences in com- >, position, in the differ- IV 2 SE ent grains of the same Fic. 39.—TRansverse Section Turoucn Variety, analysis shows Corn GRAIN ; LARGE Gers IN 2 Ker- little difference be- ties, even when they differ considerably in the appearance of cross-sections of their grains. There is probably no necessity for the Southern farmer to select corn with special reference to increasing the yield of protein or of fat. For it is easy for him to grow legumes for feeding with corn to counteract its deficiency in protein. The manufacture of corn oil is not important in the South. 95. Location of the color in the corn kernel. — It is im- portant to learn in what layer the color is located in the different classes of corn, so that one may understand that part of corn breeding which relates to the heredity of the color of the grain. The hull, or bran, of the grain of white and yellow varieties of dent corn is colorless or translucent; hence the color of white or yellow grains hes deeper, namely, in the endosperm. The pollen from a yellow variety may CORN OR MAIZE 95 promptly, or in the current cross, give a yellow color to the endosperm of the cross-pollinated grains of a white variety (see Par. 90). Since the huil- in this case is transparent, the yellow endosperm shows through and the grain appears yellow. On the other hand, the red color sometimes appearing in dent varieties is due, not to a colored endosperm, but to red color in the hull. Hence the red in the hull obscures whatever color there might be in the endosperm (for ex- ample, yellow), and determines the color of thegrain. But the pollen does not in the current cross affect the hull, so that impregnation of white grains by pollen from red varieties does not, like the use of yellow pollen, show a few months after fertilization, but must wait to show the red color of the male parent in the next generation. The color that is responsible for the blue, purple, or lead- colored appearance of certain kinds of sweet and _ soft corns, which are different races from ordinary or dent corn, is located in the outer part of the endosperm, or just be- neath the hull. The color, being in the endosperm, is sub- ject to double fertilization, and hence to the immediate display of the color of the pollen-bearing parent. A lead- colored corn planted near a white may immediately cause colored grains to appear on white ears all over the field. LABORATORY EXERCISES Roots. (1) Plant 10 grains of corn 1 inch deep and other similar lots at depths of 1, 2, 4, and 5 inches below the surface, either in a box of soil or in the garden or field : — (a) Record the number of days after planting before each plant appears. 96 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (b) In about 4 weeks dig some plants resulting from each depth of planting, making drawings showing the position of the principal roots developed from each depth of planting. (2) Carefully dig well-grown or even mature corn plants, washing the earth from around the roots. (a) At what distance below the surface do most of the roots originate ? (b) Count and record the number of main roots. (c) From how many of the joints or nodes do the true roots and brace-roots spring ? (3) Make two sketches, one showing (a) location of main roots where corn was planted in a furrow and earth subsequently thrown to it, and (b) location of main roots on a plant which has not been planted in a trench nor had earth thrown to it. Brace-roots. (4) On well-grown corn plants or on old corn stalks, examine the brace-roots, noting (a) their number ; (b) number of nodes from which they spring ; (c) diameter just above the ground, and (d) diameter 1 or 2 inches below the surface. Stems. (5) Examine the bent portion of a number of well-grown corn plants or old corn stalks which have been blown down, and sub- sequently straightened, to discover how the plant effected this bending by growing more rapidly on one side than on the other. Make a sketch of one such uneven node. - (6) Strip the leaves and leaf-sheaths from a corn stalk and record the length of (a) the lowest internode ; (b) the internode just below the shank of the lower ear, (c) the length of the internode next to the tassel. CORN STRUCTURE 97 (7) Record the total number of internodes and their average length on (a) a tall plant and on (b) alow plant in the same field. Leaves. (8) (a) Record the number of leaves on an average corn plant. (b) In how many vertical ranks are these arranged ? (9) (a) Measure the midrib of an average full-grown leaf and the margin of the same, to determine how much longer the margin is. (b) By moving the leaves about, try to ascertain how the margin helps the leaves to avoid the pressure of the wind. (c) Measure the approximate surface in square inches on the two surfaces of a grown corn leaf of average size. (d) From (Sa) and (9c) caleulate the probable number of square feet of leaf surface on 4000 corn plants borne on an acre. Ear-shanks. (10) (a) Record the number of nodes between main stem and cob on a long ear-shank. (b) Record the average length of five short ear-shanks bearing mature ears, and note whether most of the ears point up or down. Grains. (11) (a) Soak grains of corn and separate the coats, the germ, and the endosperm. (b) Cut cross-wise through a number of kernels of dry corn and compare them as to thickness of the horny layer and as to size of germ. LITERATURE SarGent, F. L. Corn Plants. Boston. HarsupBercer, J. W. Bailey’s Cyclo. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 398-402. Hont, T. F. Cereals in America. New York. 1904. Hopkins, C.G. Ill. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 87. H CHAPTER V CORN —COMPOSITION AND JUDGING Tus composition of dent and of flint corn, and of yellow and white varieties of dent, is practically the same. The corn grain contains a large proportion of carbohydrates, or starchy material, which constitutes its chief value as food. The percentage of protein is so low that for some classes of live-stock corn should be fed in connection with some food rich in protein. This is specially true for growing pigs, for working teams, and for poultry. Useful foods for feeding with corn are the following : — To growing pigs: skim milk, soybeans, cowpeas, dried blood, tankage, and pasturage consisting largely of the clovers and related plants. To horses: hay of the clovers, alfalfa, cowpea, vetches. To poultry: beef scrap, cowpeas, and fresh bone. 96. Composition of corn and its products. — The follow- ing figures represent the average of American analyses : — r CRUDE NITROGEN — Water | Ast | PROTEIN Pine alte REN on Fat Grain, dent varie- | | | ties) oe ee | OG 15: |, OS 2.2 70.4 5.0 Grain, flint varie- ties. 2. 10.3} 1.4 |) 10.5 1S? 70.1 5.0 Corn blades 30.0 | 5.5 6.0 21.4 35.7 1.4 Corn stover 40.1 | 3.4 3.8 19.7 31.9 1.1 Corn fodder 42.2 | 2.7 4.5 14.3 34.7 1.6 Corn silage | 79.1] 1.4 1.7 6.0 11.1 0.8 Corn bran. . .| 91/13] 90 | 12:7 62.2 | 5.8 Husks (Shucks) . | 17.2/3.2] 43 | 29.5 44.9 1.0 98 CORN COMPOSITION 99 97. Parts of the corn plant. — Corn stover is the residue of stalk, leaf, and shuck after the removal of the ear. Corn fodder is the entire plant when grown thickly and cured for forage. Corn blades, very generally known in the South simply as “‘ fodder,” are the leaves stripped from the plant just before the ears mature. The blades make a very palatable and nutritious food, but the yield is small, the labor of harvesting considerable, and the stripping of the blades reduces the yield of grain. Corn stover, when shredded, has somewhat the same value as cotton-seed hulls, the composition of the stover being superior but the hulls mixing better with concentrated foods and being eaten with much less waste. Stover should be fed in connection with cotton-seed meal or other food rich in protein. Corn silage consists of the entire plant cut, while still green but after the roasting-ear stage, into short lengths and stored in an air-tight compartment, calledasilo. Here it keeps with but slight loss and in green, succulent condi- tion until winter. This is the best way to utilize the corn crop for dairy cattle, and often for fattening cattle. Silage is the material that is stored; silo is the receptacle in which it is stored ; ensilage is the verb, as “to ensilage corn,” with the accent on the middle syllable. The terms are variously used and confused in current speech and writing, however. 98. Proportion of parts in the corn plant. — The Georgia Experiment Station (Bul. No. 30) found that in every 100 pounds of the above-ground part of the corn plant, after being thoroughly air-dried, the grain constituted . 38.8 per cent, the shucks. 11.1 per cent, the stalks . . . .29.3 percent, the tassels. 1.3 per cent, the blades . . . . 9.8 percent, and the cobs 9.7 per cent. 100 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 99. Corn products. — From the corn plant are made great numbers of products. Among those made from the grain are corn meal, grits, hominy, and corn flakes, — all for human food; also whisky, corn oil, glucose, starch, and many others; and for stock food, gluten meal, corn hearts, corn bran, and others. The pith of the stalk is used as a packing material in the construction of warships. From the stalk cellulose is manufactured. All parts of the plant are used as food for live-stock. 100. Draft on soil fertility. — A crop of 40 bushels of corn and 2500 pounds of stover removes approximately the following amounts of plant-food : — Nirrocen | PHospHoric AcID PorasH 40 bu. grain Sy os oe || ot) 15.9 12.8 3000 lb. stover . . . . . | 18.3 11.4 32.7 Total in grain and stover 55.3 27.3 45.5 From the above table it may be seen that every bushel of grain removes about one pound of nitrogen, two fifths of a pound of phosphoric acid, and about one third of a pound of potash. These figures impress the need of the corn plant for nitro- gen, which is most economically supplied in a preceding soil- improving or leguminous crop (as cowpeas), or in manure. It should be noticed that the stover removes about three times as much potash as does the grain; and also practi- cally half as much nitrogen. Hence the removal of the stover greatly increases the need for nitrogen and potash in the fertilizer for succeeding crops. CORN JUDGING 101 JUDGING CoRN 101. Score-card. — The object in judging ears of corn is to select the best seed corn. Various score-cards have been devised as helps in selecting the best ears by applying a scale of points to the different features. The score-cards in use in different states vary somewhat. Their purpose is to direct attention in turn to each of the points of merit or demerit of each ear. A perfect ear, if such an ear existed, would score 100 points. Deductions, or cuts, are made according to the amount of deficiency in any quality. In the following table are printed for reference score-cards used in several Southern and Western States :— alé/z/s/e|8/2/é 1. Uniformity of exhibit. . . . . 10) 15} 5) 5] 5] 10 2. Maturity and market condition . 10} 5} 10) 10; 10 5 3. Purity as shown by color of kernel 5) 10} 5} 5} 10) 10] 10) 10 4. Purity as shown by color of cob . 4 | S| 5} 5 | 5. Shape of ear 5 10} 5) 10} 10! 10) 10) 5] 10 6. Proportion, length to eeepuraterenne | 10 os) | 7. Butts 3} 5] 5] 5) 5] 5] a] 5 8. Tips . : 3} 10) 5) 5) 5) 5) 10) 5 9. Space between rows. 5! 10} 5) 5) 5) 5} 10 10. Per cent grain to ear 10 20 10 10 15 10 20 10 11. Trueness to type . | 10 | | 10] 5/10) | 10 12. Space between kernels at bobs 5 | 5] 5) 5 | 10 13. Grain — (a) shape 2 | 10} 5} 5] 10} 5] 5] 5] 5 (6) uniformity . . . .| 5 5) 5) 5) 56} 5) 5], 5 (Jigen s hey eal A 1) 0 5| 10| | 20 14. Length of ear ] ae epee ee hid | 10) 5 10,10 10 5 Weight of ear . . | 20 | | 15. Ginginitarene | ee ee ee ee ae | 5 | 5] 5} 5! 5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 102 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS LABORATORY EXERCISES Practice in scoring ears of corn. Each ear, or each exhibit of 10 ears, should be scored by the score-card above used in the state nearest the reader’s home, or by res aa 5 es eT TT b 4 rere sbi ie per ceecae a f Wr Ls ands 4 hE hs tr a Peers ba es Ty. Tic. 40. Fria. 41. Fie. 42, any other score-card that, may be preferred. Let each student, after noting the excellencies and defects of all ears shown in this CORN JUDGING 103 chapter, score a number of ears of corn, entering the figures rep- resenting his estimate of each quality in the proper space in a table ruled or printed like the table on page 101. Figs. 40-45 show defective ears of Henry Grady corn to be criticized by the pupil. Fic. 44. The following paragraphs indicate some of the most important considerations in scoring each character : — (1) Unirormity. — The ear examined should be like other ears of the same variety, and all ears of one exhibit should be uniform in size and appearance. Criticize Figs. 40-45 as to uniformity. 104 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (2) VITALITY AND MARKET CONDITION. —Good germinating power and market condition is shown by the soundness of the grain and freedom of the tip of the grains from dark spots, adhering particles of husk, shriveled appearance, or undue slenderness at the tip near the cob. Germination tests may be made. bs $90 Fic. 46.— A Goon Ear, Fic. 47.— Too Fic. 48.— Derective BUT NOT FREE FROM SuHorv. In SHare, Trp, anp Suicut Derects. Borr. (3) All grains on an ear should be of the same color. (4) Coror or cop. — A white cob is preferred for white va- rieties. Most score-cards prescribe that a yellow variety shall ' CORN JUDGING 105 have a red cob, which, however, is merely a fancy point. How- ever, the color of cob should be uniform for every ear in an exhibit. (5) SHAPE or EAR. —It is generally assumed that a nearly Fic. 49.— Too Fic. 50.—Ear witH Fic. 51.—Ear with SMALL. ENLARGED BUTT AND Bare Tip aND WIDE Wie Furrows BE- Furrows. TWEEN Rows. 106 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS cylindrical shape is best; but at the Ohio Experiment Station tapering ears were quite as productive as cylindrical ears. The Fic. 52.— An Ear roo Lone AND SLENDER, WITH AN INSUFFI- cieENT NUMBER OF Rows. I'ra. 53. — A roo SLENDER Ear, WITH SuHort Grains, Bare Trp, AND WIDE Furrows. itd tee ct Tri Wri ers Rr ireyy ae i POUT eC EET a Eee oe MITT er Tr ye AasOle BE tendo | Fic. 54.—An Ear or ONLY MeEpruM QUAL- ITy, BUT WELL-cov- ERED TIP. ear should be straight and even, without undue swelling at the butt, and the rows should be straight. CORN JUDGING 10% (6) The preferred length at present is about 14 times the cir- cumference, taken one third the distance from the butt. Yet Lace hi rT] 3 eee. | @ se cae) rv Sel hom J | 2 peer | ~ a te | * ete Ie. i, va — eee, Y " > a Sos ae bad PF ene Ps oe ig . ee a » ee eon, SP fi Se claw E ae ro * a te ‘ Pod 7. | a 2 et Ate | 2 tad —s ae my eS —" * ae an oo Hoe 1 Ss FE eee ae eee te | 4 ‘heme ee a" 4 = he re A Pi a eee mm a d es Aa ee. a ier ) o pee, sca, ee oa ca > Aa ee a ee z < ae ot pe * S A es Ke & =| SF Salli a sha al oe, { a vm, cd ol ) ] Sal Pd poe et a” —] 7d ae ed ag oA “| b—| ay ope ee ay 4 4 o 5 ly . j, Cock c, Sanders; d, McMakin; e, Local White ; /, Henry Yellow ; g, Mosby ; 7, Marlboro ation Fic. 68.— Varieties or Corn. > Grady a, Riley’s Favorite ; b, h, Experiment St: 1 + SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS erent LTT ie Tic. 69.— Varieties oF Corn. RA Poe) ~ WA Wes eee ee N gonaseesoans UudubGS wANEDOLY SOM eey Tt k, l, m, n, Boone County White ; 0, Leaming; p, Experiment Station Yellow ; g, Reid Yellow Dent; r, No. 77 g s, Iowa Silver Mine; t, Hickory CORN VARIETIES 125 Among the early-maturing varieties, but not extremely early and better suited to the South than most early varieties, are the following : — Hickory King St. Charles Blount Prolific Cocke (some strains) Mexican June corn is in a class by itself. It is chiefly valuable because of its strong root and leaf systems and its notable endurance of the heat and drought of late summer. The stalk grows to immense size, usually 11 to 15 feet. The stem is of large diameter and rich in sugar. The strain of Mexican June most commonly grown east of Texas has a small, white ear with soft grains, loosely ar- ranged on the cob. It is not very productive of grain, but when the ears are in the hard dough stage, the entire plant makes a good green food for hogs or horses. This variety is recommended only for late planting; that is, in May or June, usually on land where small grain has been harvested. There are other forms of Mexican June corn, among them a dwarf variety. LABORATORY EXERCISES Races. Make drawings from nature of the cross-sections of the grains of as many races as can be found, especially of dent, flint, pop, and sweet corn. Main characteristics of varieties. Study and write descriptions of as many as practicable of the most important Southern varieties, recording especially, — (a) habit of bearing one, or two, or more ears; (b) form of ear ; (c) shape and size of grain; (d) size and color of cob. 126 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS LITERATURE Duaear, J. F. Ala. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 111 and 134. Wiuuiams, C. B. N.C. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 204. Kiueorg, J. B., and others. N.C. Board Agr., Bul. Vol. 29, No. 2, and later. Sturtevant, E. L. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 59. CHAPTER VII CORN — BREEDING OR IMPROVEMENT Corn breeding is concerned with determining (1) what qualities of grain, ear, or plant are hereditary; (2) the best method of finding hereditary qualities; and (3) the means of improv- ing or modifying hereditary qualities. In other words, the plant-breeder’s task is to maintain desirable qualities now in existence, and to add to them or so to combine them as to make subsequent crops more productive, or otherwise bet- Fic. 70.—SuHowine THE IMMEDIATE EFrrects F : (IN THE CURRENT CROSS) OF CROSSING A ter suited to the Wuite Por Corn (on Lert) witH Potten farmer’s needs FROM a YELLOW Dent Corn (oN RIGHT). The resulting hybrid ear with both white and 109. Im prove- yellow grains is shown in the center. ment of varieties. —Corn is so easily cross-pollinated and mixed with inferior kinds (Fig. 70), that few of the so-called varieties are strictly pure or uniform. Indeed, until within the 127 128 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS past few years but few attempts have been made in the South to improve varieties by breeding or even to keep pure the best existing varieties. Almost any local kind, now found to be productive and otherwise valuable in its special locality, is worthy of being improved by careful and scientific methods of breeding. The first effort of the breeder should be directed towards increased yield, to secure which he should select chiefly those plants which carry the greatest weight of grain. Next he should aim at uniformity, and at the other quali- ties usually considered desirable. Rather than to attempt to create an entirely new variety by crossing two existing kinds, he should start with one existing variety that is nearest to his ideal, or that best suits his local needs. 110. Selection and crossing. — The plant-breeder im- proves plants by two means: (1) by selection and (2) by crossing. Selection is generally more important for the breeder, and this is the only means of improvement that the average farmer can advantageously practice. Crossing oc- casionally serves a useful purpose in the hands of a skilled breeder; but it usually destroys uniformity and must always be followed by years of selection before its results become of practical value. Selection of seed corn should be practiced by every farmer, and it gives results even in the first crop. 111. Qualities needing improvement.— Among _ the qualities for which selection should be made in developing varieties of corn for the Southern States are the following: — (1) Increased yield. (2) Production of two ears per plant. (3) Improvement in the shape of ear and kernels. CORN BREEDING 129 (4) More uniformity among kernels, ears, and plants. (5) Increased closeness and firmness of grains on the cob. (6) Strength, or power of the plant to stand up. (7) Lower position of ear on the plant. (8) More complete covering of the tip by shucks. (9) Tendency for the mature ear to turn downward. (10) A decrease in the size of the plant in some varieties. 112. Hereditary qualities.— Among the stalk charac- ters which have been found to be hereditary are the fol- lowing : — Height of plant; height of ear; length of shank; direc- tion in which the mature ear points; number and width of blades; tendency to bear more than one ear; tendency to produce suckers; and ability of the mature plant to stand erect instead of being blown down. Practically all the peculiarities of ear and grain are hereditary. 113. Height of ear.—It is desirable that the ear or ears be borne at a medium height above the ground (Fig. 35). It has been found in breeding experiments (Ill. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 132) that the height can be raised or lowered by selection with this definite end in view. In the fourth generation the average position of the ears was twice as high where selection had been made for high ears as in the strain selected for low ears, the difference in height of ears being about three feet. Accompanying the lower position of the ears was earlier maturity, a decreased number of internodes and leaves, a decrease in the length of the internodes, and a decided diminution in the height of the plant. 114. Angle of the mature ear.— The [Illinois Experi- ment Station has determined (Bul. 132) that the tendency EK 130 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS for the mature ears to remain erect or to bend downward is an hereditary quality, and that this tendency can be intensified by selection. The drooped ear, which is prefer- able because of its increased protection against rain, was found to accompany along shank. One strain had shanks averaging 12 inches in length, the other 7 inches. The diameter of the shank did not, in this case, determine the direction in which the mature ear pointed. 115. Barren plants. — Barrenness, or the tendency for a considerable proportion of the plants to bear no ear, is usually regarded as hereditary. Hartley (U. S. Dept. Agr. Year Book, 1902, p. 549) found that the removal of barren stalks from the field where seed was saved reduced the percentage of barren stalks in the next crop from 8.11 to 3.43. Since barren- ness is difficult to detect before tasseling, it is advisable to remove the tassels from all poor stalks before they shed any pollen, whether these plants are entirely barren or merely weak and poor. The remaining tassels will fur- nish an abundance of pollen. 116. Influence of size of ears. — At the Virginia Ex- periment Station (Bul. 165, p. 170), the crop from large ears averaged 5 bushels more per acre than that from small ears of the same strain of corn. Likewise greater yields were obtained from large ears at the Ohio Station; the percentage of germination was higher for the grains on the larger ears, and the young plants from the larger ears grew more rapidly. 117. Selection in the field better than in the crib. — Selection of seed ears can better be made in the field than in the crib, especially in the case of two-eared or prolific CORN BREEDING 131 varieties. Selection in the crib tends to reduce the pros portion of plants bearing two ears, and thus it may even be the means of reducing the yield. This is because in the crib, the largest ears are chosen, and these are most frequently from plants that produced only one ear. Selec- tion in the crib is of more value when only one ear per plant is desired. But even in this case, crib-selection may serve to perpetuate plants with ears borne too high on the stalk or having other serious faults. 118. Selection without an ear-to-row test. — Those who cannot take the pains and time needed to plant an ear-to-row seed patch (see Par. 120) will profit by paying to some one else even a high price for corn thus improved. Such seed corn should be bought on the ear, so that all the qualities of the ear may be known. It may be possible to maintain the excellence of a variety, but scarcely to effect rapid improvement, by simply select- ing in the entire field ears from the best and most produc- tive plants. To do this, the farmer should himself go through his field before harvest time and in a bag or basket gather as many ears as will be needed for seed. In making these selections, harvest the ears from the most produc- tive plants, but not from those the productiveness of which is due to richer soil, to unusual distance from the next plant, or to other temporary advantage. Excellence due to these accidental causes is not transmitted to the next generation. 119. Accidental versus inherited excellence. — Great improvement in the yield cf corn may be effected through the process of selection with a view to identifying and propagating those individual plants that have strong 132 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS hereditary qualities. The separation of such worthy individuals is by no means as easy as it may seem, for individual excellence may be due merely to favorable surroundings, as extra space or heavy fer- tilization, in which case the superiority is not transmitted to the off- spring. On the other hand, it may be due to inherent power in the plant itself, independent of environment; such inherent excellence is hereditary. The breeder’s first task, then, is to devise a system by which he can determine which plants are acci- dentally productive and which are in themselves superior. In other words, he must find which good plants are able to transmit their good qualities. This is best done by means of the ‘“ear-to-row’”’ system of field testing. Fic. 71.— RewativE YIELDS OF THE SAME VARIETY OF CORN FROM 2 BREEDING Rows or SAME LENGTH. CORN BREEDING 133 120. Ear-to-row system.— This method consists in planting in one row only the seed from a single ear or from part of a single ear. At harvest time the yield of each row is determined separately. The best rows indicate which parent ear was best able to transmit its good quali- ties (Fig. 71). By selecting for seed the best plants on these best rows, and again planting each ear on a separate row, im- provement is rapid, — provided the breeder, year after year, aims at the selection and perpetuation of the same good qualities. Moreover, since self-fertilization year after year causes corn to deteriorate, it is advisable to prevent this by re- moving, as soon as they appear, the tassels from the rows on which seed-ears are to be selected. In a breeding-patch in which this system is pursued proceed as follows : — 121. Details of ear-to-row system of corn breeding. — Select about 100 of the best ears obtainable from the given variety. From these discard all except 48, or other larger number, of the heaviest, best, and most uniform. Secure very uniform land and lay off as many rows as there are ears to be planted, say 48, noting that the two ends of all the rows are of apparently uniform fertility. On each row, plant the greater part of a single ear, plac- ing the best ears near the center of the plot (Fig. 72). The rows should be of uniform width and of such length as to contain at least 150 hills, the hills being in checks at a uni- form distance apart. If practicable, preserve until after harvest time the unplanted grains on cach ear, as the best of these remnants may be needed for planting the next year. 134 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Around the edges of this breeding-plot, plant the best ears not used in the breeding-plot, these ‘‘ general-crop rows ” serving partially to exclude pollen of inferior plants and of other varieties. If practicable, let this breeding-plot Pa es a Be eae eee Meal eiiale eG [elite poli Tepelees| epee ist palit ee Eee On arial eel leat el aahaes em Late hae eel ie Mer AL Pee cies ety lame sie say a Tips pes oe fo ceed teas een Oot ml an Pe eb Veer Pe FL El eet ch We Rea ag Gail spa PS PE Mi cit gals ail cit oae ag PAE Ciel sen ien sei ae seal aE Seley Ped PLATA ete lt RN Ge else cea PIES ely SEN ST hem eA diel bie I ACen CR abaya Ia Wile ed | L | | | | \ | | | | 28.26.24.22.20,18. 16.74/20. 8.6.4 2.7.3.5. 7. 9. 19.I3/5I7.19. 24.23.2537 29, Fic. 72.— DiacramM SHOWING ARRANGEMENT OF Rows IN CoRN BREEDING-PLoT. | \ | \ | | | | ; | | L 4 3 Dotted lines represent detasseled parts of each row, from which seed corn is selected ; continuous lines represent parts of each row not detas- seled ; the best ears (1, 2, 3, ete.) are planted near the center of the plot. be at least a quarter or half of a mile from any other field of corn, and preferably separated from any other corn by woodland. CORN BREEDING 135 If necessary, fertilize each half of each row with uniform weighed amounts of fertilizer. As soon as the tassels show, and before they have dis- charged any pollen, remove the tasse]s on one half of every odd-numbered row (let us say the north half) and on the other (or south) half of every even-numbered row (Fig. 72). Seed is to be saved only from the detasseled plants, thereby insuring cross-fertilization. From time to time as the crop grows, make note of and reject those rows on which the plants show undesirable qualities, as excessive growth of suckers, tendency to fall down, excessive height of ears above ground, and the like. At harvest, weigh the husked ears of each row separately and on each of the best ten rows place a label or tag on a number of ears from the best plants. On this tag should be entered the peculiar excellence, if any, of each selected plant. For planting the breeding-patch of the second year, save the ears from the best plants on the 8 or 10 best rows. Use the remaining good ears from these best rows to plant larger fields next year. These steps are usually all that are neces- sary in the improvement of corn by most farmers. The method of conducting the ear-to-row breeding-plot is the same year after year, obtaining seed each year from the best plants of the 8 to 10 best rows. All other good ears from de- tasseled plants of the most productive rows may be used as seed for a seed patch of several acres or for the general crop. The limits of this book preclude an explanation of systems of numbering the ears and their offspring, for which the reader is referred to Illinois Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 100; Connecticut Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 152 ; and Bailey’s Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, Vol. II, p. 424. 136 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS The multiplication-plot.— The ears from the most productive rows inherit productiveness on the side of the female or pistillate parent; but the pollen that fertilized these ears may have come from one of the most inferior rows. In order to insure the best pollen, careful plant-breeders sometimes take the additional step of planting each year a special multiplication-plot, or mating area of corn. In this they plant the remnants of the best original ears saved from the planting of the preceding spring. These original ears in the intervening year have shown their ability to transmit productiveness to their offspring. These remnants of ears are pure ; that is, free from admixture of pollen from inferior strains. Hence, most rapid progress in corn breeding is made by having in the second year an isolated multiplication or mating-piot, in which are planted in alternate rows two or more of the best remnants of ears, as judged by the yields of the offspring of parts of the same ears in the ear-to-row test. Half of the rows in the multiplication-plot should be de casselted. Thus self-fertilization is avoided and the union by cross-fertiliza- tion of two productive strains is insured. When it is feasible to plant such a mating-patch, the ears from its detasseled rows constitute the seed foraseed patch of the third year, the product of which will plant the entire general crop of the farm, or be sold for seed. Since special equipment of venti- lated, insect-proof jars or cases is needed in the South to preserve the remnants of the original ears for one year, mos* breeders omit the mating-plot, planted with such remnants of ears. 122. Breeding for composition. — Hopkins and Smith, at the Hlinois Experiment Station (Bul. Nos. 119 and 128), have proved that the composition of corn can be varied by selection of seed-ears. They selected for many years in succession kernels rich in the chemical constituent desired, as fat, protein, or starch. After co itinuing this work for a number of years, great variations vere found in the resulting strains. For example, afte’ ten years of CORN BREEDING 137 breeding, the strain continuously selected for its high percentage of oil contained 7.37 per cent of fat, or nearly three times as much as the strain selected for a low per- centage of oil. The increase in oil makes this high-oil strain more valuable for the manufacturers who produce from it corn oil, and also gives to the grain a higher feeding value, but a tendency to produce softer, less desirable pork. In ten years, the average percentage of protein in the grain was raised from 10.92 per cent at the beginning, to 14.26 at the end of the decade. The high-protein strain was then nearly twice as rich in this constituent as was the strain continuously selected for a low percentage of protein. The high percentage of protein gives to corn a higher feeding value, of a kind specially desirable when corn must be fed without being combined with other foods richer than itself in protein. Apparently, this strain was less able to resist drought, making a lower yield in a dry year than did the low-protein strain. It is highly probable that the high-protein strain more rapidly exhausts the soil. In breeding for a high percentage of protein, the breeder should not be deceived if the percentage of this constituent should run abnormally high in a very dry season, a result which Hopkins and Smith found to be due to the failure of the grain, under these conditions, to assimilate its usual quantity of starch. 123. Other effects of breeding for composition. — The strain continuously selected in Illinois for low prote‘n made larger ears and a larger yield of grain per acre than the higher protein strain; likewise, the strain poor in fat generally yielded more grain per acre than the strain rich in fat, and had larger ears than any other strain whatso- ever. Its grains were broader, due to the larger proportion of starch, and consequently there was a smaller number of rows of kernels than on the ears of other strains. 138 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 124. How to select grains according to composition. — Those kernels, which, in cross-section, show a large pro- portion of germ, are rich in fat; those with an abundance of horny material are rich in protein; while those with the greatest proportionate development of loose floury material are richest in starch. It has been found that the composition of the kernels of the entire ear is about the same as that of any row of grains on the ear. 125. Germination test. — Care should be taken to select for planting only those ears on which nearly every grain will germinate. In a good sample, 97 per cent of the grains should sprout. A germination test of the ears planted is important, even when a larger number of grains is planted in each hill than will be left to grow there. This test becomes doubly important when thinning is to be avoided by planting in each hill only the number of grains expected to grow and to remain. Many ears, apparently sound, afford but a low percent- age of germination. Among the signs of poor germination are a dark area near the tip of the grain, or a shriveled tip ; but many grains that appear to be sound fail to sprout. Some farmers have found it profitable to test for germination every ear planted. The method used is the following : — The seed-ears are spread out on the floor in order and a number attached to each by means of a small nail driven through a small pasteboard label and into the butt end of the cob. Each ear is given a number, and from each ear six or ten grains are removed, these being taken from different parts of the ear. A germination-box is made by taking any shallow box of proper size, placing in it one or more inches of damp sand or damp sawdust (Fig. 73). Thesand is covered with a white cloth, which is marked off with a pencil into squares about two inches each way, CORN BREEDING 139 each square bearing a number corresponding to the number on one of the ears. Six or ten grains taken from different parts of each ear are placed on the square bearing the same number as the ear. Another cloth (or cloth bag containing damp sawdust) is laid over the squares containing the grains to be tested, and over this second Fic. 73. —GERMINATOR MADE FROM A SoAP Box, AND READY TO RECEIVE THE SEED. cloth is spread about an inch of moist sand or damp sawdust. The box is placed in a warm room, and in seven to ten days a count is made to determine which ears sprout properly. Donot use for planting any ear which bore a grain that failed to sprout. 126. Crossing versus selection. — Crossing two dis- tinct varieties results in variation (or a lack of uniformity) in the plants; uniformity may not again be completely established even after five or ten years of subsequent selection. Hence it is usually better for the farmer to improve his corn by selections among the individual plants of a single variety than to attempt to cross two dissimilar varieties. However, since crossing in certain rare cases is advisable, and since it often takes place accidentally, a few of the simpler effects of crossing are briefly discussed. 127. Definitions of degrees of relationship between corn plants. — Self-pollination or in-breeding consists in placing the pollen of one plant on the pistil (silks) of the 140 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS ; same plant. This relationship is too close for best yields, especially if the process be continued for several years. Close-breeding consists in crosses made among the silks and tassels of plants all of which sprang from grains borne in the next preceding generation on one ear. This rela- tionship is so close as to incur the danger of reducing the yield of grain. Cross-breeding consists in crosses made between plants that are not related. This may be (a) Between unrelated plants of the same variety; or (b) Between different varieties of the same race, as yellow and white dent corns; or (c) Between different races, as sweet and dent corn. As a rule, the most desirable relationship is cross-breeding between unrelated plants of the same variety. 128. Effects of in-breeding and of cross-breeding on yield. — Experiments have shown that continued self- fertilization of the corn plant reduces the yield; and when self-fertilization is practiced for several successive genera- tions, it may dwarf the stalk and finally result in some measure of sterility (Figs. 75, 76). Halsted (N. J. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 170) found that self-pollination in sweet corn tended to increase the percentage of albino plants; that is, those with white foliage — an undesirable quality. Cross-breeding, on the other hand, invigorates the strain, and some recent experiments show that it may greatly increase the yield in the first generation of cross-bred plants. But it should be remembered that cross-breeding of dissimilar types has the serious disadvantage of destroy- ing uniformity. It should be confined chiefly to plants of the same variety, or to very closely related varieties. CORN BREEDING 141 13. 74.—SHowine Bap Errects oF Continvots IN-BREEDING. Compare with Fig. 75. Fic. 75.—Suowine LarGer YIELD AND BETTER Ears FROM CORN NOT IN-BRED. Compare with Fig. 74. 129. Inheritance of color. — Any part of the ear or grain that develops when pollen is excluded is obviously merely the outgrowth of tissue from the mother plant. By in- \ 142 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS closing the young ear-shoot in a paper bag, it is found that among the parts that develop in the absence of pollen are the cob and the hull (or seed-coats) of the grain. These parts (cob and seed-coats) cannot be changed in the current cross (that is, in the generation in which the cross is made) by pollen from a plant having a different character in these parts (see Pars. 90 and 95). Now whenever grains of corn are red, the red color is located in the hull. Proof of this is shown by the fact that meal from red corn is white, after the bran has been carefully sifted out. Hence if the female parent has red grains, the grains maturing soon after a cross is made will be red, no matter whether the pollen used be from a plant with yellow, with white, or with bluish grains. Jn the same way if pollen from a red variety be placed on the silks of a white or yellow variety, the grains of the current cross will all be of the same color as that of the silk-bearing parent. Very different is the way the yellow color of the corn grain is transmitted. The yellow color resides, not in the hull, but deeper in the structure of the grain; that is,in the endosperm. Proof of this is shown in the fact that meal from yellow corn is always yellow, even after the most complete removal of the bran. Those parts of the kernel inclosed inside of the hull, that is, the germ and the endosperm (including the aleurone layer), may be visibly influenced by the pollen used in the current cross, that is, by ‘‘double fertilization’’; these inner portions of the grain may display in a few weeks after the cross is made the color derived from the sire or pollen-bearing plant. Now the yellow color is located in the endosperm. The purple color is located in the thin aleurone layer just under the seed-coats. Both the en- dosperm and its aleurone layer are subject to double fertilization by pollen, and thus they are at once influenced in color by the male parent. Hence pollen from a pure yellow variety, falling on silks of a white kind, promptly makes the grains thus fertilized yellow. Likewise pollen from a lead-colored corn, falling on silks of a white variety, promptly makes the hybrid grains lead-colored. CORN BREEDING 144 This is because both the yellow and the lead colors, being in the endosperm, which may be influenced by the male parent, display their color through the transparent hull or bran of the white mother plant. But in the next generation, these hybrid seeds produce grains of various colors or shades. 130. Dominance of certain qualities in hybrids. — Ac- cording to Mendel’s law, certain pairs of opposite quali- ties are not inherited in mixtures or blends, but separately, every individual descendant showing one or the other of these opposing qualities. The quality that shows in the greater number of the descendants is called dominant, while the quality showing forth in the smaller number of descendants of the cross is called recessive. Experiments have shown, according to East (Conn. State Agr. Expr. Sta. Rept. 1907-1908, Part VII, p. 41), that in corn the following characters are dominant over their opposites :— Yellow is dominant over white color of kernels. Red is dominant over white color of kernels. Purple is dominant over white color of kernels. Flint quality of grains is dominant over dent. Flint quality of grains is dominant over sweet. Dent quality of grains is dominant over sweet. Certain dominant qualities show in the current cross; among these are yellow or purple color of grains (when crossed cn white varieties), and flintiness of grains, whether crossed on dent or on sweet corn. Asarule, the recessive grains, or those showing no effect of the cross in the second hybrid generation, are practi- cally pure as to that quality, and these pure white or pure dent grains of the second hybrid generation subsequently come ‘‘ true to seed.”” But the grains showing the dominant quality, yellow color or flint structure, cannot thus be selected as pure, because many of them have been influenced, though imperceptibly, by the recessive character (white color or dent structure). In other 144 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS words, of the seed showing dominant qualities some are pure dominants and some are mixed, though having the same appear- ance as the pure dominants. 131. Practical results. — Practical application may be made of the somewhat technical statements in the last few paragraphs in the following way, and in other operations in plant breeding : — (1) After crossing pollen of a pure yellow variety on silks of a pure white variety, say in 1910, practically all of the grains of the current cross in 1910 may be expected to be yellow or yellowish; all the pure white grains found in the second generation among the descendants of, this cross may be considered as pure-bred so far as concerns color, and these white grains may be expected in all future years to produce only white grains. (2) After crossing pollen of a pure white variety on silks of a pure red variety, all the grains of that current cross will be red (because the hull of the grain is furnished by the mother parent, uninfluenced by the pollen used in the current cross) ; when these red grains are subsequently planted, the crop will contain a majority of red grains, most of which will be impure, as shown by their descend- ants, bearing both red and white grains. On the other hand, the white grains, found in the second generation in smaller number among the red grains, are pure; and when these white kernels are planted, their offspring will consist entirely of white kernels. 132. Relative value of top and bottom ears for planting. — When there is any considerable inequality in size be- tween two ears growing on one plant, the upper ear is generally the larger. CORN BREEDING 145 Using plants of identical parentage, Hartley! found that the yield of grain per plant grown from lower ears was equally as great as the yield from plants grown from upper ears. He found the plants grown from middle ears (on three-eared plants) to average 0.65 of a pound of ear corn per plant, as compared with 0.70 of a pound from the offspring of both upper and lower ears borne by the same parent plants. Redding (Georgia Experiment Station, Bul. No. 55) obtained a slightly larger yield of grain from the offspring of bottom ears than from those of upper ears. The Alabaraa Experiment Station (Bul. No. 134) obtained in 1903 with St. Charles White a greater yield from upper ears, but in 1905, in a more extensive test with the Experiment Station Yellow variety, there was practically no difference in the grain yield of plants tracing to upper and to lower ears. At the Rhode Island Station (Bul. 116) Card found in sweet corn a tendency for the seed from upper ears to produce a greater number of ears per plant than seed from lower ears. This he assumed to be due to the more complete maturity and greater size of the upper ears of sweet corn. On the whole, available evidence is not sufficient to show any material difference between top and bottom ears for planting; and on theoretical grounds we should expect top and bottom ears, if equally developed in size and matur- ity, to be equally valuable for planting. 133. Seed from different parts of the ear. — It is cus- tomary in the South to remove the grain tor about an inch both at the tip and at the butt of the ear. Numerous experiments show little or no difference in yield of corn produced by planting grain from the tip, butt, and middle portions of the ear. Even when the experiment extended through a number of successive generations, there were no notable differences in the yields. 1 American Breeders’ Association, Vol. II, p. 124. L 146 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Hartley found that the small kernels, usually on the tip, gave a higher percentage of weak and unproductive plants than larger kernels. Jeffrey (Mich. Exp. Sta., Cire. 3) found that in most, but not in all varieties, the butt kernels germinated more slowly and the tip kernels more promptly than those from the middle of the ear (Fig. 76). The Illinois Experiment Station has shown (Bul. 55, and Bul. 28, p. 460) that the tip kernels contain a slightly lower percentage Fig. 76.— Youna Corn PLAnts. On left, from tip kernels; in center, from middle grains; and on right, from butt kernels. of protein than the middle or butt kernels, and that the butt kernels are slightly the richest in this constituent. The tip kernels contained a slightly larger proportion of starch than the others. Kernels from the tip, middle, and butt were prac- tically alike in percentage of oil and ash. On the whole, it seems advisable to remove the tip grains of the seed-ears : (1) so as to secure seed of more uniform size, an important consideration where a constant number of grains must be dropped by the planter in each CORN BREEDING 147 hill; and (2)-so as to avoid injured and very small grains, which would either fail to germinate or else cause the young plants produced from them to grow off slowly. 134. Grading the seed grains. — When extreme care is taken to get all kernels of as nearly a uniform size as pos- sible, in preparation for machine planting, each ear, after being “nubbed” and ‘tipped,’ may be shelled sepa- rately into a pan, and the resulting grain grouped into kernels of three different sizes or shapes. This is more conveniently done by shelling all nubbed and tipped ears together and then separating the grains into three sizes by passing them through a series of sieves with meshes of different sizes. 135. Effects of change of climate.— Corn brought into the South from a cooler climate acquires year by year in its new home greater height of stalk and later maturity. With many highly improved varieties the grains apparently become shorter and the number of rows may be reduced. As arule, varieties from the corn-belt are not adapted to the cotton-belt. They mature too early, make a smaller yield of grain and stover than native varieties, and the grain is often unmarketable, being weevil-eaten and chaffy. Among the relatively few varieties from the corn-belt which have in a few experiments shown fair yields of grain are Boone County White and St. Charles White. Even these afford a better grade of grain when the date of planting is rather late. In the region just north of the cotton-belt, the Western varieties are nearer an equality with the native kinds. As a general rule, the best seed corn is that produced in nearly the same latitude where it is to be grown. Usually corn of Southern varieties produced south of the Ohio and Potomac 148 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS rivers succeeds anywhere in the cotton-belt. Corn growers just north of the cotton-belt are able to use seed from a still higher latitude, but here, too, native improved varieties and locally grown seed are usually more satisfactory than seed corn from a widely different climate. LABORATORY EXERCISES Comparison of ears. (1) Select 5 or 10 plants with ears high above the ground and record the average height above ground of the node bearing the upper ear. (2) Make the same record for 5 or 10 plants in the same field with ears low on the stalk. (3) If practicable, compare the maturity and weights of the shucked ears on the two types of plants just mentioned. ~ Upper and lower ears. (4) Select ten plants, each bearing two well- developed ¢ ears. Shuck and compare the weights of (a) the ten upper ears and (b) the ten lower ears. (c) Does the upper or the lower ear “dev elop and mature first? (5) Tip, BUTT, AND MIDDLE GRAINS. Make germination tests of 100 tip grains, 100 butt grains, and 100 from the middle of the -ear. (6) Varration. Record for two plants of the same variety as many points of difference as you ean discover. What does this suggest as to the advantages of seed selecting and breeding ? Color of grains. (7) Soak kernels of red and yellow corn, separate the coats, and determine in what part of the grain each color is located. Barren plants. (8) Determine in any field the percentage of barren stalks. CORN BREEDING 149 Silks. (9) Provided any corn in silking stage is available. (a) With a magnifying glass examine the fresh silk sticking out beyond the shuck for hair-like branches and for pollen grains that have lodged on the silk. (b) Tie large, strong paper bags over several young ear- shoots before any silks appear. (c) A few days after the silks appear under the bags, note how much longer they are than silks which have re- ceived pollen. (d) While the silks under one bag are still fresh, and before any pollen has reached them, cut all the silks on one side of the ear, just inside the shuck; apply corn pollen onthe remaining silks. In three weeks note the number of grains of corn developed on each side of the injured ear. \ LITERATURE East, E.M. Conn. (State) Expr. Sta., Rpt. 1907-1908, Part VII, p. 41, and Conn. (State) Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 158. SmiryH, L. H. Ill. Expr. Sta., Bul. Nos. 128 and 132. Wiuurams, C.G. Ohio Expr. Sta., Cire. No. 71. Hartiey, C. P. U.S. Dept. Agr., Farmer’s Bul. No. 229. Soutz, A. M., and Vanatrer, P.O. Va. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 165. Davenport, E. The Principles of Breeding. New York, 1907. Davenport, E. Ill. Expr. Sta., Bul. No 119 and Cire. No 101. Weszser, H. J. Plant Breeding. Bailey’s Cyclo. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 53-69; and Xenia (double fertilization), U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Phys. and Path., Bul. No. 22. CHAPTER VIII CORN — SOILS, ROTATIONS, AND FERTILIZERS WHILE corn will grow on an extremely wide range of soils, yet good yields can be expected only on rich or highly manured land. The corn plant, with its abundant fol- age, actively engaged in transpiring moisture, needs large supplies of water. Therefore, the best soil for corn is one which can furnish a large and regular supply of water during periods of dry weather. Such a soil is usually a deep, rather rich loam, well supplied with vegetable matter. As a rule, bottom lands afford larger yields of corn than up- lands. 136. Bottom lands and uplands for maize. — Bottom lands on which corn makes its best yields should be well drained, since the corn roots need a constant supply of oxygen from the air, and air cannot penetrate saturated soil. Neither can the roots range to sufficient depth when the line of saturation is near the surface. The more poorly the land is drained, the later must the corn be planted and the greater the risk of failure, should the subsequent season be unfavorable. Uplands can be fitted for a maximum development of corn by gradually increasing the depth of plowing and by constantly adding vegetable matter, by judicious rotation of crops, or by the application of barn- yard manure. 150 CORN SOILS 161 137. Poor and acid soils. — It is doubtful whether land so poor as to produce without fertilizers only 10 bushels of corn per acre is in condition to produce a profitable crop of corn, even when fertilized. It will usually be more profitable in such cases to grow first a crop of cowpeas or of some other soil-improving plant before planting the land in corn. Corn makes a fair yield even on land that is slightly acid ; but on such soils, the yield is usually improved by an application of about half a ton of slacked lime per acre. Corn is more intolerant of dryness in the soil than of any other condition. A dry or thirsty soil may cause the leaves to “ fire’ and the plant to be undersized, with only one ear or nubbin per plant. Moreover, on thirsty land, the distance between plants must be wide, resulting in a small yield per acre. 138. Other corn soils. —In selecting land for corn, deep sand beds should be avoided, as being too poor and dry. The stiffest clays are also not desirable, since they are often too compact for sufficient penetration by the roots and for thorough preparation, cultivation, and drain- age. Corn is a favorite crop on new ground or land from which the timber has just been cleared. RotTaTION 139. The place of corn in a rotation. — On cotton farms there is too frequently no effort to practice rotation or sys- tematic change of crop from field to field. Especially is there a failure to alternate any other crop with corn, for the reason that in the sandy and hilly country corn is generally planted on the narrow bottoms, which constitute the best 152 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS corn land of these regions. In these cases (on the richer bottoms), so long as the yield is satisfactory, and no undue amount of disease appears, it is probably better to violate the usual rules of rotation and to grow corn continuously than to change it to the shallow, dry soils of the hills. However, tracts that must for this reason be cropped an- nually with corn should be carefully supplied with vege- table matter by one of the following methods: (1) Either by sowing cowpeas thickly each summer among the grow- ing corn plants, or else (2) by growing each winter a crop of crimson clover, bur clover, hairy vetch, or other winter- growing legumes, to be plowed under in April or May as fertilizer for the corn crop of the same year. 140. A three-year rotation.— When possible, corn should enter into the regular farm rotation. In the rota- tions best suited to the average cotton plantation corn usually follows cotton, and is followed by fall-sown oats or by wheat. This position is given to corn, not for its own advantage, but because corn can easily be removed in time for the fall sowing of the small grains, while cotton is not generally removed at so early a date. Incidentally, corn grown after cotton gets the advan- tage of the clean and late cultivation given the latter, and this starts the young corn plants promptly into growth. Corn, following cotton on a field comparatively free from the seeds of weeds and grasses, can be produced with less labor than corn after corn. A good three-year rotation is the following : — First year: cotton; Second year: corn, with cowpeas between the rows; Third year: oats or wheat, followed by cowpeas. CORN FERTILIZELS 153 This places corn on one third of the cultivated area each year. When this rotation is repeated through the fourth, fifth, and sixth years, it is plain that cowpeas or cowpea stubble, following the small grains, is plowed under just a full year before corn occupies the land. 141. A four-year rotation. — The above scheme may readily be changed into a four-year rotation by growing two successive crops of cotton, the first of which may well be followed by a catch crop of crimson clover, plowed under about April 1, as fertilizer. This places corn on one fourth of the cultivated land and on fields where cowpeas were plowed under two years before and where, perhaps, crimson clover was plowed under one year before the corn was planted. FERTILIZERS 142. Need for a fertilizer rich in nitrogen. — Corn must make a rapid development of stalk, leaf, and ear, and for this purpose there must be present in soil or fertilizer a large amount of plant-food.. The rapid growth scems to make especially necessary largesupplies of nitrogen. Those soils richest in nitrogen almost invariably produce the largest yields of corn. In unpublished experiments made on a wide variety of poor soils in Alabama, nitrogenous fertilizers have increased the crop to a much greater extent than any other kinds. In these tests, potash was usually of far less value than when applied to the cotton plant. Acid phosphate was intermediate in value be- tween the nitrogenous and phosphatic fertilizers. However, the results of fertilizer experiments vary greatly according to the nature and previous history of the soil. 154 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 143. Leguminous plants an economical source of ni- trogen. — Recognizing the great need for nitrogen, the wise farmer will provide it in the most economical and effective manner. This is best effected by the use of cowpeas or other leguminous crops, grown on the land, and either plowed under as fertilizer or used as fertilizer after having been consumed by animals. When nitrogen is supplied in these bulky forms, the plant-food is accompanied by a large mass of vegetable matter, which has the effect of making the land more retentive of moisture in periods of drought. Thus fertilization with nitrogen, through rota- tion with leguminous plants, supplies the two greatest needs of the corn plant, namely, nitrogen and moisture. 144. Suggestive fertilizer formulas. — Proper fertiliza- tion is governed by soil, kind of tillage, previous treat- ment of the land, and other considerations. No one fertil- izer formula therefore fits all conditions, but the following are suggested : — (1) By the Georgia Experiment Station (Bul. 74). For corn on worn uplands, — Acid phosphate, 1000 lb. Cotton-seed meal, 1218 lb. Muriate of potash, 32 lb. Total, 2250 lb. (for several acres). This fertilizer analyzes about 10 per cent available phosphorie acid, 5 per cent nitrogen, and 2 per cent muriate of potash. The author suggests the following as often applicable for loam and clay soils, — (2) 100 to 200 Ib. acid phosphate per acre ; 100 Ib. nitrate of soda, the latter applied when the plants are 2 to 4 feet high, on one side of each row; or, CORN FERTILIZERS 155 (3) 100 to 200 lb. acid phosphate, 200 lb. cotton-seed meal. (4) For very sandy soils, — 100 to 200 lb. acid phosphate, 100 Ib. nitrate of soda (or 200 lb. cotton-seed meal), 50 to 100 Ib. kainit. For land that has been enriched in nitrogen by the plowing under of cowpeas or similar growth, it will usually suffice to fertilize with 200 lb. per acre of acid phosphate or of an ordi- nary cotton guano. But even here, it will often be profitable to add 50 or 100 Ib. of nitrate of soda when the plants are 2 to 4 feet high. When corn is grown in rotation on fairly good loamy or clay soil, it appears to be better policy in most cases to withhold potash from the corn, which is often unresponsive to it, and to apply if necessary an additional amount to the cotton crop grown in the same rotation, — thus getting the benefit of its specific effect in restraining cotton rust on soils subject to this malady. 145. Time to apply fertilizers. — When ordinary amounts of commercial fertilizer, say 200 to 400 pounds per acre, have been used, most experiments have shown at least as large yields from applying the whole before planting as from applying a part before planting and a part during the cultivation of the crop. This conclusion is summed up in a quotation from Bulletin No. 74, Georgia Experiment Station, by Redding: ‘‘ The experiments conducted on this station long since proved that . . . (inter-cultural fertilization) is not profitable as arule. On the other hand it is often advisable to withhold a part of the fertilizer for inter-cultural application, when the total amount to be applied is large; for example, 500 to 1000 pounds per acre.” 156 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS In the Williamson method of corn culture (see Par. 175), all of the fertilizer is applied comparatively late in the life of the plant. Whenever nitrate of soda is the nitrogenous fertilizer, it should be applied wholly or in part after the plants have begun growth and before they shoot, preparatory to tas- seling. It is believed that nitrate of soda is more effective if applied when the plants are between 1 and 4 feet high than if placed in the soil at a later stage of maturity. 146. Methods of applying fertilizers. — When com- mercial fertilizer is applied to corn, it is usually drilled in. The Georgia Experiment Station found that about the same results were obtained from half a pound of fertilizer in the drill as from one pound sown broadcast. The method of distribution in the drill before the planting of the seed is by hand application or by the use of a fertilizer distributor, or by the use of a combined fertilizer dis- tributor and planter, which performs both operations at one time. When fertilizer is applied to corn after planting, it is usually placed in a furrow 2 to 4 inches deep and a few inches from the line of plants. With most fertilizers, it is desirable that this later application, when made at all, be at a depth of 2 to 4 inches, so that this layer of fertilizer and the roots congregating around it may not be disturbed by subsequent shallow cultivation. When nitrate of soda is applied after the corn is 1 to 4 feet high, it is drilled 6 to 8 inches from the plant, the depth being of little consequence. Indeed, nitrate of soda requires no covering when applied on damp soil. However, it is generally advisable for it to be covered slightly by the next cultivating furrow, so that if a sudden heavy rain should occur, this fertilizer would not be so completely washed away as if it were caught by rain while still on the surface. CORN FERTILIZERS 157 147. Quantity of fertilizer. — Until the recent agitation about the Williamson method of corn culture, it was the general opinion that it was ordinarily not advisable to use very large amounts of commercial fertilizer for corn, 400 pounds per acre being then considered a rather heavy application for this crop. Experience shows that corn does not, as surely as cotton, pay a large profit on a large quantity of commercial fer- tilizer. There is more risk with the corn crop because its bearing season, from silking to hardening of the kernels, is shorter than the fruiting season of cotton; and drought at this critical time in the life of the corn plant is apt to ruin the crop, regardless of the amount of fertilizer em- ployed. LABORATORY EXERCISES (1) Compare 10 corn plants grown: on a rich bottom soil with 10 others of the same variety grown on a dry upland, recording :— (a) average height of plant ; (b) average height of upper ear above ground ; (c) average number of square feet of ground occupied by each plant, and (d) average weight of shucked ear or ears per plant. (2) Apply a teaspoonful of nitrate of soda to each corn plant on one row and each week afterwards compare the size and color of plants on this row with those that received no nitrate of soda. . LITERATURE Duaaar, J. F. (Rotation.) Ala. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 134. Dopson, W. R. (Rotation.) La. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 111. Wuirney, Mitton. (Fertilizers.) U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Soils, Bul. No. 64. CHAPTER IX CORN — THE TILLAGE OR CULTIVATION SouTHERN lands are usually in extreme need of vegetable matter. Too often the stalks of corn or cotton are burned in preparation for the next crop. Whenever possible, Fic. 77.— A SraLk-cutTrer. the stalks and weeds, instead of being burned, should be plowed under. To do this properly, it is often necessary to use a stalk-cutter (Fig. 77), which is usually drawn 158 CORN TILLAGE 159 by two horses. At each trip it cuts into bits, about a foot long, the stalks on one row. In the absence of the stalk- cutter, corn stalks are cut into two or three sections with the hoe, and large cotton stalks are chopped with a stalk-cutter or broken by beating them with a heavy stick, preferably on some frosty morning in winter. In plowing under weeds or other litter, the work can be much better done by dragging the loop of a heavy chain, one end attached to the beam and the other end to the outer end of the single-tree on the same side as the moldboard. The loop of this heavy chain runs just in front of and above the share of the plow and bends the weeds down so that they can be completely covered by the inverted soil. 148. Time of plowing. — The time must vary with conditions. The stiffer the soil and the larger the amount of vegetation to be plowed under, the earlier should plow- ing be done. On stiff soil plowing may well begin in November and be completed before Christmas. While land plowed at this time will have become compacted on the surface by planting time, this surface crust can easily be lightened by the use of a disk-harrow just before planting. There is considerable leaching, or waste of fertility, from plowed soils left bare during the winter, especially from sandy soils. This loss is greater the earlier in the fall the plowing is done. Hence the preparation of sandy soil may be postponed until the stiffer soils have been prepared, but even sandy soils should be prepared for corn before the teams are monopolized in the preparation of land for cotton. 149. Ridging versus flush plowing. — The main systems of preparing land for corn may be classified as follows : — (1) Ridging, or forming beds on which the rows of corn 160 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS are to be planted; (2) plowing land on the level, which is called flush or broadcast plowing; (3) preparing the land so that corn may be planted in the water-furrow or de- pression between the beds. Ridging, or bedding, is confined to a few regions where the drainage is deficient ; for example, the prairie or stiff, waxy lime lands of Alabama and Mississippi. Even here, while bedding is perhaps generally necessary for corn planted early on poorly drained soil, it can often be dis- pensed with, or the height of the beds can be reduced. The disadvantages of planting on elevated ridges are great, among them being the following : — (1) More surface is exposed to evaporation and the row dries out more rapidly ; (2) The depth of soil left in the water furrow is insuffi- cient to support plant roots, thus confining them largely to the limited area immediately under the ridge. The one. purpose and advantage of ridging is to secure increased drainage and warmth. Hence, even in the re- gions where usually regarded as necessary, the ridging of corn that is planted late is usually undesirable. 150. A modified ridging system. — A system that has not come into general use but that has been recommended for stiff, poorly drained soil, is the following, which affords drainage on one side of each row, and on the other side all the advantages of level planting. Prepare the field by back-furrowing so as to make eight- foot lands, or lands of double the width desired for a single row. Plant two rows 4 feet apart on this eight-foot land. This places each row 2 feet from a water-furrow on one side. The other side of the same row can be tilled level. CORN TILLAGE 161 151. Level preparation and planting. — There are numerous advantages in plowing the land level rather than into ridges. As a rule, the soil is thus more completely turned and a greater variety of improved implements can be used, — for example, the disk-plow, the row marker, and the check-rower, or two-horse corn planter. More- over, except on very wet soils, the yield of corn is usually greater from level planting than from ridging. This is due to the greater ability of the level land to retain mois- ture during periods of drought and to the wider range of the roots, and to their more uniform covering with moist soil. Level planting is preferable for corn tilled in checks and for many loamy soils, whether the crop be checked or drilled. 152. Planting in the water-furrow. — On sandy upland soils in most parts of the Gulf States, it is the custom of many farmers to plant corn in the water-furrow formed by first bedding the land, thus placing the seed in a deep depression. It is asserted for this method that by placing the plants deeper it brings their roots into a moist layer of soil and increases resistance to drought. It also makes tillage easier, saving part of the work with the hoe, for the reason that the filling of the furrow by the cultivating implement readily covers and smothers young grass. In a comparison of this method with that of planting on beds (doubtless low beds), the Georgia Station found no advantage from planting in a water-furrow on reddish clay-loam — a soil which is somewhat stiffer than in the regions where planting in the water-furrow is most cus- tomary. At the Alabama Experiment Station (Bul. No. 111), on M 162 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS permeable gray sandy soil (Norfolk sandy loam), the yield was one year favorable and one year unfavorable to this method as compared with level planting. Planting corn in water-furrows is not to be commended for stiff soils; but for permeable sandy soils, this course seems to be aclvisable. 153. Preparation for planting in the water-furrow. — This system is the most popular one on sandy uplands and other dry soils. When the preparation is to be thorough, ridges are made by back-furrowing in such a way as to leave the water-furrows about 5 feet apart. The bed is not quite completed, but a narrow strip or balk, 6 to 8 inches wide, where the water-furrow will be, is left unplowed until the farmer is nearly ready to plant corn. Then with a shovel plow, he throws out this balk and plants the seed in the freshly broken furrow, often by means of a com- bined fertilizer distributor and planter, which places both fertilizer and seed at the bottom of the newly made water- furrow and 5 to 8 inches below the level of the highest part of the ridge. During tillage, the soil of the ridge is worked toward the plants in the water-furrow, so that, when the crop is laid by, the field is practically level. “Listing” is a special method of planting in a deep furrow; it is common in the dry regions of the Southwest. 154. Depth of plowing. — Naturally this should vary with the character of the soil and the depth of the pre- vious plowing. In general, it may he said that most Southern corn fields are not plowed deep enough. The increase in depth is best made gradually, plowing each year one inch deeper than the preceding, until the desired CORN TILLAGE 163 depth is attained. The earlier in the season the land is plowed, the greater is the increase in depth that can properly be made. Hence, fall plowing or early winter plowing may be deeper, sometimes an inch deeper, than plowing done in February or March. Usually the yield is decreased by bringing to the surface, especially near the time of planting, any very large amount of clay from the subsoil. But while this may reduce the first crop, the increased depth is apt to incréase the yields of sub- sequent crops. 155. Subsoiling.— A method of suddenly increasing the depth of plowing consists in running a special subsoil Fic. 78.—A Supsoit Plow. plow in the bottom of every furrow made by an ordinary turn-plow. This may double the depth of soil stirred. As a rule, subsoiling is best done in November or Decem- ber, or before the beginning of the rainy season of winter. After the winter rains begin, the subsoil of most fields is usually too moist for the advantageous use of a sub- soil plow. If subsoiling is done when the subsoil is too wet (and this may be the case while the surface soil is 164 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS abundantly dry for plowing), more harm than good will result. Since the subsoil is compact, much power is needed to pull a subsoil plow (Fig. 78), making this a rather expensive operation. While there are many exceptions, the majority of experiments in subsoiling land subsequent to January 1 have shown no immediate increase, or not enough to pay for the extra cost of subsoiling. Subsoiling, when needed Fic. 79.—A Turn-pPiow. at all, should not be done more frequently than once in two or three years. It is usually more practicable to in- crease the depth of ordinary plowing than to practice sub- soiling. Implements used in preparation for corn. — Besides the stalk cutter, the implements for preparation are usually either the turn- plow (Fig. 79), which may be of various sizes and patterns, or the disk-plow (Fig. 80). The latter is suited only to level plowing but does its work more completely than the turn-plow, though appar- ently at greater expenditure of horse power. Use is sometimes CORN TILLAGE 165 Fic. 80.--A Disk-PpLow. The disk which turns the soil shows only dimly beyond the frame. made of a double moldboard plow or ‘‘ middle burster,’’ and, in the semi-arid Southwest, of a somewhat similar ‘‘lister."” Doubtless some of the labor-saving implements of the latter region, such as “Jisters’’ and ‘‘combined listers and planters’”’ (Fig. 81) could be effectively used on sandy soils in the South. Various forms of Fic. 81.— ComBInep LISTER AND CORN PLANTER. LO6 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS harrows (Fig. 85) are used by the best farmers to pulverize the clods after plowing. Partial preparation. — Two methods of preparation deserve notice here, both involving the performing of only a part of the work before planting. Much of the corn in the limestone prairie region of Alabama and Mississippi is planted by making a list, or slight ridge, with two turn-plow furrows thrown on the seed dropped in the old water-furrow. Then theridge is completed by throwing two or more additional furrows of a turn-plow against this ‘“‘list.””. This method places the seed deeper in the ground than is probably advisable in such stiff soils but gives opportunity for a practice not yet in common use in that region, namely, the partial pulling down of the ridges and the cultivation of the field by using the spike-tooth harrow before the corn comes up. Another system of partial or deferred preparation is practiced to some extent in the sandy or hilly region. A deep furrow is opened, in which the seed and fertilizer are placed; then a fur- row on each side is thrown toward the seed, the greater part of the land remaining unbroken until cultivation begins. The combined breaking and cultivation is done gradually with a small, deep- running plow or shovel. This is obviously a laborious method, requiring the use of small, unsatisfactory implements. Its chief excuse is the occasional occurrence of continued wet weather at a time when land for corn should be prepared. 156. Planting. — Much corn is still dropped by hand, and in this case it may be covered by any kind of a plow. Much is planted by one-horse or single-row planters (Fig. 82), with which fertilizer distributors are often com- bined. The use of check-rowers (two-row planters) is restricted in the South to a rather limited number of localities where the land is comparatively level. Planters save labor, usually afford a more even and prompt germination, and leave the young plants in straighter lines, thus making tillage easier. CORN TILLAGE 167 157. Depth of planting. — Corn may be planted and come up well at almost any depth between 1 and 4 inches. The general rule is to plant it just deep enough to insure a continuous supply of moisture. Hence, planting late in the season on a dry, loose seed-bed may require the seed to be covered with 3 or even 4 inches of soil. In the Fic. 82.— A One-Row CorRN PLANTER. earlier part of the season 14 to 3 inches may be considered the best depth for most conditions. The depth of rooting is not strictly governed by the depth of planting, since the few roots thrown out near the sprouting kernel are not the ones from which the plant draws most of its water and food (Fig. 83). Most of tne perma- nent roots originate at the crown, which is usually about 1 inch below the surface of the soil, regardless of the depth of planting. 168 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 158. Date of planting. — In the southern part of the Gulf States, east of Texas, corn planting becomes general about the first of March; and in the central part of the Gulf States it is in full progress about the middle of March. Fie. 83. — DraGram oF YounG Corn PLANTS. Showing that the depth of the crown, where most roots originate, is nearly the same with shallow, medium, and deep planting. In the northern part of the same states most of the planting is done in April. The corn planting season in all states of the cotton-belt practically extends from about the first of March to nearly the first of July. Bottom lands are frequently not planted until May or later, while in the same locality the preferred date for planting the uplands may be some time in March. Plantings made in June, even on bottom lands, are usually less productive than those made in May or earlier. A part of the corn is sometimes planted late, in order to distribute the labor of cultivation through a longer period. Only the seasons can determine whether in any given a CORN TILLAGE 169 year it is better to plant uplands very early or at a medium date. The general belief inclines to the advantage of the very early planting of uplands, or as soon as danger of killing frost is past. However, success is sometimes made by planting at almost any date between the last killing frost and the first of June. Incidental considerations sometimes govern the date of planting: For example, on land that is especially liable to the injury of young corn plants by the small budworm (see Par. 189), it is regarded as advantageous either to plant very early, or still better, to postpone planting until about the first of May. The common idea in postponing plant- ing is that the soil becomes so warm as to discourage the insects. Probably a truer explanation is found in the more rapid growth of the late-planted corn, which sooner grows beyond the stage in which it is attacked by the budworm. Early planting has a tendency to pro- duce a smaller stalk than late planting, a desirable result. Corn planted early re- quires a greater number of cultivations. Late planting, while making a very tall stalk, reduces the injury from weevil by reason of the late date of maturity. Late-planted corn, if harvested before becoming thoroughly dry, requires more py. 84, —Hanp Corn ventilation of the cribs than is generally Prpanrer, For ReE- necessary with early-planted corn. PLANTING. 159. Replanting. — This is generally done by dropping the seed by hand and covering with a hoe. This involves many unnecessary motions and much waste of time. An 170 SOUTHERN FIELD UROPS improvement consists in using the rotary or other hand planter (Fig. 84), which, when thrust into the soil, leaves several grains covered at the proper depth. The yield from hills that have been replanted is often unsatisfactory, probably because of their being crowded by the older plants and partly, perhaps, because of an in- adequate supply of pollen for the few plants which produce their silks after most corn has ceased to tassel. Hence if the stand of corn is poor, it often pays better to plow up the remnant and plant again, rather than to replant the vacant spaces. 160. Harrowing before and after planting. —In the preparation of land for corn in the South, the harrow is not so generally used as it should be. The disk-harrow can be advantageously used to slice large clods left by the plow. Another use to which it is seldom put, but which it serves admirably, consists in running it over crusted land to break the surface crust so that when plowed, large clods do not form. 5 1. Make a drawing showing the stamens and stigmas of a cotton flower, after removing the bracts and pctals. 2. If specimen plants of Sea Island cotton can be had, or if the seed and lint can be obtained, compare them with the corre- sponding parts of American upland cotton. LITERATURE Dewey, L. H. U.S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook, 1903, pp. 388-390. Evans, W. FE. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 33, pp. 67-76. Watt, G. The Wild and Cultivated Cotton Plants of the World. London, 1907. Gammnig, G. A. The Indian Cottons. Calcutta, 1905. CHAPTER XVII COTTON — VARIETIES OF AMERICAN UPLAND THERE are many hundred names to represent varieties of cotton. The Alabama Experiment Station has tested more than two hundred of these so-called varieties and has found that a large proportion of them are merely synonyms. However, it is probable that the number of distinct varie- ties, each differing from the other in one or more items of agricultural or botanical importance, exceeds one hundred. 254. Reasons for variation. — Among the causes which have led to this multiplication of varieties are the follow- ing: — (1) Modifications of the plant resulting from continuous selection, or from special soil and climatic conditions ; (2) Artificial crosses intentionally made with a view to creating new varieties combining some of the qualities of both parents ; (3) Natural hybrids resulting chiefly from the carrying of pollen by insects from the flowers of one variety to the stigmas of another ; (4) Names have been needlessly multiplied, both inten- tionally and unintentionally, so that some varieties may be purchased under half a dozen different names. 255. Varieties of cotton not easily recognized. — The differences between the numerous agricultural. varieties 282 COTTON VARIETIES 284, are so slight that even an expert is unable to identify with certainty any but those varieties having the most definite characteristics. Indeed, the description of any variety will not apply to all the plants in it, but is to be taken rather as a general or average portrayal. 256. Classification of varieties. — The study of varie- ties may be much simplified by arranging them in a small number of groups, as is done in the subjoined scheme of classification. The American upland short-staple cottons may be divided into six classes; to this is added a seventh division to include short-staple varieties of a character intermediate between any other two groups. An eighth group differs from all the others because its members possess a long staple. d Group 1. — Cluster type. Group 2. — Semicluster type. Group 3. — Rio Grande type, of which the Peterkin is an example. Group 4. — The early varieties of the King type. Group 5. — The Big-boll type. Group 6. — The Long-limbed type. Group 7. — Intermediate varieties. Group 8. — Long-staple Upland varieties. The lines of separation between these groups are not distinct ; one group gradually merges into another. 257. Cluster group. — The varieties belonging here are easily distinguished, (1) by the extreme shortness of the fruit limbs in the middle and upper parts of the plant (Fig. 133), and (2) by the tendency of the bolls to grow in clusters of two or three (Fig. 134). The few base limbs are usually long. The plant in general possesses an ap- 284 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Fic, 133.— A Cotron PLANT oF THE CLUSTER TYPE. COTTON VARIETIES 285 pearance of slenderness or erectness. The bolls are usually small; the seeds are small to medium in size and thickly covered with fuzz. On account of the peculiar shape of plant, cluster va- rieties may be left thicker in the drill than most other kinds. This class of cotton is much less popular now than formerly. This is probably due to the deficiencies usu- ally found in cluster cotton; namely : — (1) A special tendency to shed or drop a large propor- tion of the fruit when con- ditions of soil and weather are unfavorable ; Fic. 134.— A Froitine Lr ofr « ; CLUSTER CoTTON PLANT. (2) The small size of boll ; Showing four bolls; also a branch and terminated by a boll, and hence not capable of further growth. (3) The large proportion of trash which must usually be included with the seed cotton when picking, — this trash consisting largely of the bracts, which at an earlier stage formed the square. Examples of cluster varieties are Jackson and Dickson. 258. Semicluster group. — The varieties of this class present somewhat the appearance of cluster cottons, but the fruiting limbs in the middle of the plant are of short to medium length (Fig. 135). The bolls, while close together, are not borne in clusters. This characteristic is sometimes united with the qualities found in other groups, in which case the variety is classed, not as a semicluster, but in accordance with its other striking characteristic. 286 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Fic. 135.—A Corton PLANT OF THE SEMICLUSTER TYPE. COTTON VARIETIES 287 There is much diversity among the semicluster varieties in size of boll, size of seed, and percentage of lint. Among semicluster varieties are Hawkins and Poulnot. 259. Rio Grande group. — This is named for one of the earlier varieties, which had almost the same characteristics as the Peterkin, now so exten- sively grown. Among the dis- tinguishing marks of this group are (1) a large propor- tion of lint, usually 35 to 40 per cent of the weight of the seedcotton,and (2) small seeds, many of which are nearly naked ; that is, thinly covered ye. 136. — Tur PererKrs Type of Corton Pint. with short fuzz, so that the seeds appear dark or even black. The leaves are, as a rule, smaller and supplied with narrower, more sharply pointed lobes than in the case of many other varieties. The bolls are small to medium and the seed small to very small. The branches are usually slender and rather straight, and either medium- or long- jointed (Fig. 136). 288 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 260. The Early King-like group (Fig. 137). — The plants are small to medium in size. The fruit limbs, even near the top of the plant, are long, slender, and often crooked. The vegetative branches at the base of the plant are short or wanting. The bolls are small. The leaves are similar to those of the Rio Grande group. The seeds are usually small and covered with fuzz of various shades. A large Fic. 137.—A Corron Pianr or tur proportion of the blooms Fae Gee on varieties of this type are marked with red spots near the inner base of each petal. The King and its synonyms and related varieties consti- tute the earliest of the commonly grown American upland cottons. The chief faults of these varieties are the small size of boll, the short fiber, and the tendency of the seed cotton to fall from the burs. 261. The Big-boll group. — The one sheraetenaees serv- ing to identify the varieties of this group is the large size of the boll. While the size of boll varies with many con- ditions, an arbitrary division must be made somewhere ; hence, in this scheme of classification, bolls are considered large if sixty-eight or fewer mature bolls yield one pound of seed cotton. This group may be further subdivided inte the following overlapping subdivisions : — Fic. 138. —A Cotton Piant oF THE Bic-noLt Storm-proor TYPE. U 289 290 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (1) Storm-proof big-boll cottons (Fig. 138) ; (2) Big-boll varieties having plants of the shape that characterizes the semicluster group; and (3) Ordinary big-boll varieties having neither marked storm resistance nor semicluster shape of plant.. Examples of storm-proof big-boll cottons are Triumph, Rowden, and Texas Storm-proof. Among the semicluster big-boll varieties are some strains of Truitt, Bancroft, and individual plants of a number of big-boll varieties. Among big-boll varieties of the third subdivision are the widely grown Truitt and Russell, the latter having green seed. Here, too, belong Cleveland and Cook, two very productive varieties, the bolls of which are sometimes scarcely large enough to admit these varieties into the big- boll class, where they usually belong. 262. The Long-limbed group. — In this class the plants grow to large size and have long limbs with long internodes; that is, they are ‘long jointed.” Apparently this is a disappearing class, represented chiefly by unimproved cotton. No existing variety of notable productiveness is included in this group. 263. The Intermediate group. — This group is provided merely as a matter of convenience to include varieties that are too nearly halfway between any other two groups to be assigned to one of them. 264. The Long-staple Upland group (Fig. 139). — The superior length of staple is the distinguishing characteristic of this group. The lint usually measures 1} to 14 inches. The percentage of lint in the seed cotton is low, usually less than thirty-one. Examples of this group are Allen Long- staple, in which the plants are tall and usually of a semi- COTTON VARIETIES 291 cluster shape. The bolls of Allen Long-staple are slender and small, and the seed are densely covered with white Fic. 139.—A Cotron PLant or THE LoNG-sTAPLE UPLAND TYPE. fuzz (Fig. 140.) Other examples are Griffin, which has a very long but weak lint, and bolls that are above the average in size for long-staple varieties. On upland soils the long-staple varieties are usually less productive than short-staple cottons and afford a lint shorter than that produced on moist, rich, bottom land. However, the Blue Ribbon, a variety resulting from a cross between a long-staple upland and a short-staple kind, has proved well adapted to upland soils, especially in the Pied- mont Region of the northern part of South Carolina. The chief fault of the last-named variety is its special liability to injury from boll-rot (anthracnose, see Par. 386). 265. Productiveness of varieties. — The most impor- tant fact brought out by a study of the numerous tests of ‘SOTIOLIVA aTdv}s -PLOYS PUB -SUOT Waaajoq puqAy & st ‘Moped ‘yYSU oY} UO UaUTIDOds oY} { o]dv}s-BUO] oIe Mos Joddn oy}y Ul eso, ‘NOLLOD 4O SHILEIUVA IVE GAGY JO SUA —‘OPFL ‘Ol COTTON VARIETIES 293 varieties of cotton made at all of the Experiment Stations within the cotton-belt is that there is no one variety that ; has proved most productive for all conditions of soil and climate. The reason for this is easily seen. A very early variety is usually the best for the extreme northern portion of the cotton-belt, because of the shortness of the season there; but this same variety, if carried farther south, is usually surpassed in yield by later varieties, which continue to make fruit through a longer season. Moreover, it is apparently true that varieties originating on one class of soil are placed at a disadvantage when tested on a widely different type of soil. At the Alabama Experiment Station, the varieties which in recent years have usually taken highest rank in yield of lint per acre are Cleveland, Cook Improved, Toole, Lay- ton, and Poulnot. It is notable that Cleveland, Cook, and Toole have also occupied high positions in tests made in Georgia and in several different parts of Mississippi. Cook has made a good record also in several localities in North Carolina. Leading varieties at Southern experiment stations. — The follow- ing table makes mention of those varieties which have, as a rule, taken high rank in yield of lint per acre at the experiment sta- tions in the cotton-belt : — List of Varieties making Largest Yields of Lint per Acre at Experi- ment Stations through a Number of Years Alabama (Auburn) Cook Improved Toole Cleveland * Layton Poulnot Jackson 294 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Alabama (Canebrake) Truitt : Russell Peerless Peterkin Georgia Cook Improved Layton Cleveland Toole Jackson Jones Re-improved Peterkin King Louisiana (Baton Rouge and Calhoun) (Boll weevil present) Simpkins King Toole Triumph Rublee Mississippi (Agricultural College Station) Cleveland F Cook Lewis Prize Hawkins Russell King Mississippi (McNeil Substation) Cook Toole Cleveland King Peterkin Mississippi (Delta Substation) Cleveland Lewis Prize Cook Triumph bo © or COTTON VARIETIES North Carolina (Edgecomb, in Coastal Plain) Cook Russell Culpepper Peterkin North Carolina (Piedmont Region) King Cook Shine Edgeworth North Carolina (Red Springs) Culpepper Excelsior King Russell South Carolina (Clemson College Station) Toole Texas Oak Bates Improved Peerless South Carolina (Greenville, 3 years) Texas Wood Peterkin Truitt South Carolina (Columbia, 1883-1888) Duncan Mammoth Jones Improved Dickson South Carolina (Darlington, in Coastal Plain) Peterkin Texas (College Station) Excelsior Triumph Beck Big-boll Bohemian Peterkin Texas Oak Sure Fruit Lowry 296 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Descriptions of Prominent and Typical Varieties Jackson. —The Jackson variety is one of the tallest and slenderest of the cluster group. It has also been known as African and Limbless, neither of which is correct; it did not originate in Africa, as once claimed, and only a small proportion of the plants lack the long base limbs. The bolls are small, closely clustered, and very difficult to pick. These constitute the chief objections to this variety, which is quite productive, especially when the plants are crowded rather closely, and this can be done with this erect variety to a greater extent than with long-limbed kinds. The percentage of lint is above medium. The seed is fuzzy, of medium to small size, and usually covered with a brownish gray fuzz. Hawkins. — This variety is typical of the semicluster group. It is rather early in maturity. The bolls are small to medium and the percentage of seed cotton medium. Peterkin. — This variety is a type of the Rio Grande group, having some seed that are nearly naked or slightly covered with fuzz, which is often of a brownish tint. The plants are of medium size, abundantly supplied with branches. The percentage of lint is high, the size of bolls small, and the size of seed very small. This is one of the most widely grown varieties and is usually satisfactory in yield. As regards maturity, it is medium to late. Layton. — This variety is similar to Peterkin except in having a smaller proportion of naked seeds and a thicker covering of grayish fuzz on most of its seeds. In several recent tests at Experiment Stations it has afforded a larger yield of lint per acre than Peterkin. Toole. — This variety bears many points of resemblance to Peterkin and some resemblance to King. It is earlier and usually somewhat more productive of lint than Peterkin. The plant is of medium to small size and well suited to intensive fer- tilization (Fig. 141). It is one of the few varieties which gener- ally in recent years have stood near the top of the list in produc- tiveness in most of the Experiment Stations where it has been COTTON VARIETIES 297 tested. Its chief weakness is the small size of the bolls. The percentage of lint is high and the size of seed small. King. — This variety, like all the others “of the same group, is distinguished by its extreme earliness, by the small size of the Fic. 141.— A Propuctive Cotron PLant oF THE TOOLE VARIETY. plant, and by the occurrence in some blooms of red spots near the base of each petal. Near the northern edge of the cotton- belt this is one of the most prolific varieties, but elsewhere it is usually surpassed in yield of lint by later cottons. The chief objections to this variety are the readiness with which the seed cotton falls from the bur to the ground and the small size of bolls. Russell. — This is one of the most widely grown varieties in 298 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS the central and southern parts of the cotton-belt. It is a big- boll cotton with very large leaves. It is characterized by the green color of most of its seed. : The bolls are large and do not readily drop the seed cotton. The seeds are large and the percentage of lint is low. The yield of lint per acre is usually satisfactory, but not exceptional. This variety is late and therefore, in the presence of the boll-weevil, likely to decline in popularity. Truitt. — This is a typical big-boll variety with many of the plants assuming the semicluster form. The seeds are large and usually covered with grayish fuzz. Truitt is widely grown. Triumph. — This variety was developed in the southern part of Texas from a cotton of the storm-proof group. Its special claim to prominence is its earliness combined with the large size of boll. This variety is very popular in Texas in the presence of the boll-weevil and has given general satisfaction to farmers east of the Mississippi River, where, however, its percentage of lint seems to be lower than nearer its place of origin. This variety combines a number of good qualities, namely relative earliness, large size of boll, and at least fair productiveness. Cleveland. — This is a big-boll variety, though searcely typical of that group, nor are the plants entirely uniform. Its special points of merit are the very high rank in yield of lint per acre which it has taken in most of the Experiment Stations where it has been tested, and its earliness, which is greater than that of most big-boll varieties. Its worst fault is the tendeney of the seed cotton to fall from the bur. It appears to be promising for boll-weevil conditions. Cook Improved. — The bolls of this variety are barely large enough to place it in the big-boll class. The plants are somewhat variable in form and appearance. The special merits of this variety are its earliness, its high percentage of lint, and the very high rank in yield of lint per acre which it has taken in most tests at the Experiment Stations. Its greatest fault is its special tendeney to be injured by cotton boll-rot (anthracnose). |GENERAL CROP 500 oo SELECT PLANT (1) Hmmm] 200 Joon} 5 ACRE 5090 SELECT PLANT a@)-——- Beier 5 ACRES 500 SELECT cont) ‘ae GENERAL CROP SELECT PLANT, Fic. 145.— Diagram sHowina Meruobd oF SELECTING COTTON. attempt elaborate plant-breeding in connection with ordi- nary farm work. 280. Size of seed for planting. — Several experiments have shown that by separating and planting only the heavy seed, the percentage of germination is notably increased. A better stand results and a larger yield is sometimes obtained. It does not follow that because the largest seed within a given variety are superior to the smaller seed, that variety is best which has the largest seed. Indeed the opposite is often true; the high percentage of lint that is frequently found in varieties with small seed often makes them more productive of lint than varie- ties with large seed, COTTON BREEDING 313 Methods of separating large and small or heavy and light seed. — As cotton seed come from the gin, covered with a coat of fuzz, they tend to cling together in masses. This renders it difficult, without previous treatment of the seed, to separate the largest from the others. Webber and Boykin recommend (U.S. Dept. Agr., Farmer’s Bul. No. 285) the following treatment of the seed: A thin flour paste is poured on the seed, which are then stirred or otherwise agitated until every seed is covered. The fuzz is thus pasted down to the hull. After drying, the seed are in condition to be easily separated in a fanning machine especially constructed so as to blow out the lighter seed. Those which have been treated with paste can be planted more thinly than otherwise, which is an advantage in the subsequent thinning of the plant. The delinting of the seed, which consists in reginning them, as is commonly done by oil mills, also makes it somewhat easier to separate the individual seeds. LABORATORY EXERCISES 1. If practicable, make a number of crosses, preferably among varieties having easily recognizable features; pupils who are es- pecially interested may wish to plant the resulting seeds and to note the diversity among the plants. 2. Students should copy the score-card below amd by its aid score the plants, — preferably by pairs, — of several varieties. This exercise needs frequent repetition, not so much to familiarize the pupils with the score-card (which may be considerably modified for special objects), but for the purpose (1) of directing more careful attention to the characteristics of the different varieties or strains, and (2) to train the eye and the mind to the prompt recognition of the defects and valuable characteristics of any cotton plant observed. SCORE-CARD FOR COTTON The following is the score-card devised for the use of students of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute :— 314. SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Form, short-jointed, well-branched, indicating fruitfulness . 15 YiELD (standard 1 bale or more per acre) : (a) Size of bolls (standard 40 per pound; 1 point de- ducted for each additional 5 bolls required per pound of seed cotton) .. . 15 (b) Per cent lint esimndierd, 40 per gents Bae iGee eral varieties ; 32 per cent for long-staple; 1 point cut for each 1 per cent below standard) . . . . . 10 (c) Number of mature bolls per plant . . . . . . . 15 (Standard, unfavorable conditions . . . . 20) (Standard, medium conditions . . . . . 60) (Standard good conditions : ge oe oe LOO) Total yield (a and b and c); orw Amhed iol seed cotton times average per cent lint of that variety . . . 40 Earurness (standard being the earliest plants of King). . 10 Harpiness of plant towards disease . 3 Storm Resistance 2 COMPLETENESS OF OPENING ca ease of piclame 2 Lint Length of lint (standard, es 1 to 1's inehes; long staple, 112 inches) : 8 Uniformity in length of fibers on same seed 8 Strength 3 Fineness 3 Color 2 Maturity . 2 A 2 UntrorMiry oF SEEp in size, aolor, ste: 3 2 Cita eo ee 100 LITERATURE Wesser, H. J. Improvement of Cotton by Seed Selection. U.S. Dept. Agr. Yearbook, one pp. 365-389. Wespser, H. J., and Boykin. U.S. Dept. Agr., Farmer's Bul. No. 285. Bennett, R. L. Breeding an Early Cotton. Tex. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 79. Proceedings American Breeders’ Association. CHAPTER XIX COTTON — SOILS AND FERTILIZERS CoTTON is a most adaptable crop. Almost any land in the cotton-belt —from light sandy to stiff clay — will produce a crop, provided it be well drained, and, if poor, supplied with the necessary kind and amount of fertilizing materials. 281. Soil range. — A large proportion of the American cotton crop grows on land too sandy, dry, and poor to be thoroughly satisfactory for corn. Indeed, a large area of cotton grows on land too poor to yield a profit even from cotton. These unprofitable areas, these “ robber acres,” are the source of much loss to cotton farmers. They could be more advantageously devoted to pasture or to leguminous plants. On sandy land the plant is much more subject to injury from cotton rust than on loamy or clay soils. On some very rich, moist, bottom land, cotton makes a stalk of excessive size without a corresponding develop- ment of fruit. Therefore, such lands are not favorable for cotton, but may be more advantageously devoted to the production of corn, hay, or pasturage. “cc GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ON FERTILIZING COTTON 282. Draft of cotton on soil fertility. — The table in para- graph 246 showed that in certain experiments the seed and lint together contained about half the total nitrogen and 315 316 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Showing retention of leaves on the right, due to vegetable matter; and shedding of leaves on the left, where there was less vegetable matter in the soil. COTTON FERTILIZERS 317 phosphoric acid but only a quarter of the potash found in the entire plant. The composition of a plant or of the part removed from the soil is not a guide to the correct fertilization of that plant; yet it is well to know that the lint and seed together in a crop of 300 pounds of lint re- moved plant-food which at ordinary prices would be worth in commercial fertilizers about $3.75. Of this amount, the fertilizer constituents in the lint alone are worth only 25 to 30 cents. Indeed, no other ordinary crop makes such slight demands on fertility as does the 2otton fiber. If the seed and all other parts of the plant except the lint were returned to the soil, there would be no reductions in fertility except those due to extraneous influences, such as surface washing, loss of vegetable matter (Fig. 146) through clean cultivation, and loss of nitrates from the soil in the drainage jwater. The seed and lint together, in the case of a crop of 300 pounds of lint, make a draft on soil fertility that is about the same as would be removed by the grain alone in a crop of 25 bushels of corn or of 35 bushels of oats. 283. Amounts of fertilizer required to take the place of plant-food removed by lint and seed. — Three hundred pounds of cotton-seed meal and twenty-seven pounds of kainit would furnish all the fertilizer constituents re- moved from the soil by a crop of 300 pounds of lint with its accompanying seed; this quantity of cotton-seed meal would supply not only the nitrogen, but all of the necessary phosphoric acid. If the nitrogen were drawn wholly from the decay of leguminous plants and no cotton- seed meal were applied, 51 pounds of acid phosphate, con- taining 14 per cent of available phosphoric acid, would ° 818 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS supply all the phosphoric acid removed in a crop of seed and lint of the size indicated. In fact, such figures give no idea of the amounts and kinds of fertilizer actually found to be advantageous for the cotton plant. For example, in practice the usual amount of acid phosphate is at least 120 to 200 pounds per acre, which supplies several times the amount of phos- phoric acid removed by seed and lint in a crop yielding 300 pounds of lint. The necessity for applying much larger amounts of phosphoric acid than apparently required by the composition of the cotton plant is largely due to the fact that a large proportion of the phosphoric acid is con- verted in the soil into compounds that are not promptly available. Means of determining the fertilizer required by cotton on different soils are discussed in succeeding paragraphs. 284. Phosphoric acid. — There are no indications either from the appearance of the soil or from the appearance of the plant as to whether phosphoric acid is needed. However, in regions where the use of commercial fertilizers for cotton is general, experiments and experience have indicated that the need for the application of phosphates is almost universal. Usually a fertilizer for cotton should contain more acid phosphate than any other single chem- ical fertilizer. 285. Potash. —In determining the probable require- ment of cotton for potash, note should be made of the proportion of clay or silt compared with the proportion of sand. Clay and silt are frequently formed from materials rich in potash; hence the more clay or silt the soil con- tains, the less, as a rule, is the need for potash. COTTON FERTILIZERS 319 However, some clay soils contain a large amount of pot- ash, but in an unavailable form. In this case the potasn can often be made available by improved preparation and cultivation and by the addition of vegetable matter. The sandier the soil and subsoil the greater is the need for potash. Even on sandy lands, this fertilizer may not be needed in any considerable amount unless cotton rust commonly occurs on such soil. 286. Nitrogen. — The proper proportion of nitrogenous fertilizer to acid phosphate in a fertilizer formula for cotton depends more on the recent cropping and manur- ing of the field than on. the character of the rocks from which the soil has been derived. One can usually decide if nitrogen is needed by considering the following facts : — (1) Small stalks (if not due to climatic influences, poor cultivation, etc.) are usually an indication that nitrogen is needed. (2) Excessive stalk or ‘‘ weed” growth of cotton is an indication that nitrogen can be dispensed with, wholly or partially. (3) The fresher the land the less the need for nitrogen. (4) Phosphate hastens maturity and may make more severe the injury from cotton rust. (5) A luxuriant growth of cowpeas or of any other legume just preceding cotton largely dispenses with the necessity for nitrogen in the fertilizer ; so does a recent heavy dress- ing of stable manure or cotton seed. However, the only positive means of determining the exact fertilizer requirement of any soil is by making on it an experiment with fertilizers. c 320 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 287. Effects of commercial fertilizers on the soil. — Commercial fertilizers are, on the whole, profitable, in spite of many misfits between soil, crop, and fertilizer. Indeed, in a large part of the cotton-belt they are indis- pensable. The profits from their use will increase with a more general knowledge of agricultural principles. Com- mercial fertilizers have been occasionally charged with being largely responsible for the impoverished conditions of the cotton fields and the scant profits of the cotton grower. This is not correct. They do not in themselves exhaust the soil. Reliance upon fertilizers alone may cause a farmer to keep his land too long in cotton, instead of letting cotton alternate with soil-improving crops, such as cowpeas. The exhaustion of the fertility of the cotton fields is due chiefly to leaching, washing, and loss of vege- table matter as the result of continuous clean cultivation. For the scant profits too often secured in the culture of cotton, the chief causes are impoverished soil, purchased supplies, unintelligent use of fertilizers, scarcity of capital, deficiency of labor-saving machinery, unsatisfactory labor conditions, and the failure to master the principles which underlie a rational system of farming. What should be condemned is not the use, but the abuse, or purposeless use, of commercial fertilizers. 288. Most popular factory-mixed fertilizers. — The use of ammoniated guanos, that is, complete fertilizers con- taining nitrogen, is more general among cotton farmers than the use of chemicals bought separately and mixed on the farm. The most extensively used form of com- plete ready-mixed guano contains about 1.65 per cent of nitrogen (equal to 2 per cent of ammonia), 10 per cent of COTTON FERTILIZERS 321 available phosphoric acid, and 2 per cent of potash. This is spoken of as a 10-2-2 guano. 289. Advantages of the home-mixing of fertilizers. — If the farmer decides to buy the separate materials and do his own proportioning and mixing, he usually purchases cotton-seed meal, acid phosphate, and kainit. If he wishes to make a more concentrated fertilizer, that is, one of higher grade, he may buy the nitrogen in the form of nitrate of soda, or sulfate of ammonia, and the potash in the form of muriate or sulfate of potash. Those farmers who understand how to mix fertilizers find that it is much more economical to do so than to buy the average ready- mixed guano. The advantage of home-mixing are the fol- lowing : — (1) The mixture made at home usually costs several dollars less per ton than a factory-mixed fertilizer of exactly the same composition. (2) Home mixing permits the farmer to suit the fer- tilizer to the particular soil on which each lot is to be ap- plied, and to adapt the fertilizer to the different crops. For example, in purchasing a complete ready-mixed fer- tilizer, he applies this to all soils and all crops; yet the nitrogen in it is not needed by legumes, such as cowpeas and peanuts; and the potash in it may not be required by any crop on some clay soils. In making his own mixture the farmer would omit the nitrogen in the one case and the potash in the other, and thus save their cost. How- ever, farmers who do not understand how to suit the fer- tilizers to the soil and the crop find it advantageous to use a factory-mixed guano. Its one slight advantage con- sists in being somewhat more evenly mixed. x 822 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 290. Amounts of increase from commercial fertilizers. — The results of several hundred fertilizer experiments made on a great variety of soils in Alabama led to the con- clusion that, as an average, each ton of fertilizer adapted Iria. 147. —A Finup or Corron. The plot on the left was unfertilized and yielded only 460 pounds of seed cotton per acre ; that on the right received 640 pounds per acre of a complete fertilizer and yielded 1206 pounds, an increase of 746 pounds of seed cotton per acre. to the soil should afford an increase of about 1500 pounds of seed cotton, —or one bale increase per ton of fertilizer COTTON FERTILIZERS 323 (Fig. 147). Under unfavorable conditions, —as on prairie or waxy lime land, or with unsuitable fertilizer, or with the use of excessive amounts, — the increase was much less. These estimates are for appropriate mixtures of high- grade chemicals. Smaller figures would probably represent the increase from a ton of ordinary cotton guano, or ready-mixed fer- tilizer. If all the fertilizer experiments made by the experiment stations be averaged, including those on soils not needing fertilizers, the average increase drops far below one bale for each ton of fertilizer. (Bul. No. 62, Bur. Soils, U.S. Dept. Agr.) 291. Profit returned by fertilizers. — Assuming an in- crease of one bale (say 1500 pounds of seed cotton) for each ton of well-proportioned and appropriate fertilizer applied to four or five acres of land, an estimate can be made as to the profit, under favorable conditions, afforded by a judicious investment in fertilizer. Thus : — To one ton complete fertilizer, estimated cost incash . $22.00 To extra cost of picking ‘and ginning the in- creased yield, 1500 pounds, at 60 cents per hundred. 9.00 By value of increased amount of seed, 1000 pounds, at 75 cents per hundred . . $ 7.50 By value of one bale of cotton, 500 pounds at 10 cents per pound ... .. . oe ee 50.00 Possible profit, from use of one ton of fertilizer . $26.50 - $57.50 $57.50 292. Advantages of high-grade fertilizers. — Among either factory-mixed, or home-mixed fertilizers, those of higher grade,’ that is, containing higher percentages of 324 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash, naturally cost more per ton than low-grade fertilizers. Yet the high-grade fertilizers are usually more economical. The true test in choosing between two fertilizers consists in calculating which one affords a pound of nitrogen, potash, and avail- able phosphoric acid at the lower price. The reason why a concentrated, high-grade fertilizer is usually more economical than a low-grade fertilizer is made clear by com- paring a 12 per cent acid phosphate with a 16 per cent phosphate. To afford an equal amount of plant-food, say 960 pounds of avail- able phosphoric acid, requires 4 tons of the low-grade fertilizer, but only 3 tons of the high-grade fertilizer. This extra ton of the low-grade article involves extra expense for freight, hauling, mixing, and sacking. Hence, the manufacturer or dealer must charge more for each pound of plant-food in the less concentrated fertilizer. The advantage of using the highest grades of fertilizers increases with the distance that the fertilizer must be shipped and hauled. If, however, a fertilizer be made too concentrated, there is greater difficulty in mixing its constituents uniformly and in applying it evenly, because the amount to be used on each acre is so small. 293. Quantity per acre of fertilizer. — Experiments in several states have shown that an application of 400 to 600 pounds to the acre of a fertilizer adapted to the soil affords a larger profit to the acre than the use of smaller amounts. At the Georgia Experiment Station a complete fertilizer was used at the rate of 400, 800, and 1200 pounds per acre. Each increase made a decided and _ profitable increase in the yield. However, the smallest lot returned much the highest percentage of profit on the investment ; the 800 pounds paid a higher dividend than the largest amount. This illustrates the usual rule, which is that the percentage of profit on the mvestment in fertilizers COTTON FERTILIZERS 825 decreases as the amount of fertilizer increases ; but that the profit per acre is usually greater with the larger amounts, up to a certain point, which is often above 600 pounds per acre. Probably 200 pounds or less per acre is the amount of fertilizer most generally applied to cotton. Moderate to large applications pay best when the season is favorable, but involve the risk of loss should climatic conditions be extremely unfavorable. To ren- der as safe as possible heavy or intensive fertilization, the soils on which it is employed should be in good mechanical condition. especially as regards drainage and power to retain sufficient moisture during drought. This latter condition may usually be brought about by a rotation that affords an abundance of vegetable matter and by judicious preparation and cultivation, NirroGENovs FERTILIZERS 294. Nitrogen produced on the farm. — The cheapest sources of nitrogen are barnyard manure and the legu- minous or soil-improving plants, such as cowpeas, velvet beans, hairy vetch, and (when pastured by hogs) peanuts. Manure may pay even better for hay and other forage crops than for cotton. Cotton seed is too high-priced in most localities for use as fertilizer. 295. Cotton seed vs. stable manure. —In Alabama extensive comparisons of manure from horse stables with cotton seed were made on many soils, using an average of 835 pounds of fresh seed alone against a little over two tons of stable manure. Increase due to stable manure, — seed cotton peracre . 444 lb. Increase due to cotton seed, —seed cotton peracre. . 288 lb. 326 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS From a summary of the results of many tests made in Alabama during three years and on numerous soils, appears that 5 pounds of stable manure exerted during the year when applied as fertilizer a greater influence on the yield of cotton than did one pound of cotton seed used without crushing or heating; that the average yield was increased by 101 per cent when stable manure was used and by 64 per cent when cotton seed was used; and that to obtain an increase of one pound in the yield of seed cotton there was required 3 pounds of cotton seed, or nearly 10 pounds of rich stable manure. 296. Cotton seed vs. cotton-seed meal. — Most tests show practical equality for a pound of nitrogen in cotton- seed meal and in crushed or rotted cotton seed. To fur- nish equal amounts of nitrogen requires the following amount of each : — | | PHos- [eee | ee) ie ASH 2000 Ib. of cotton seed contain ‘ G--- \BR | eae | oes 963 Ib. of cotton-seed meal (6) per cent | 62. | 26.5 16.3 nitrogen) contain... a ec er | The average of a number of experiments on many soils in Alabama showed that, as a fertilizer for cotton, one pound of high-grade cotton-seed meal was equal the first year to 2,5, pounds of crushed cotton seed. Later ex- periments in Alabama and Georgia make a still more favorable showing for the meal. Cotton seed exerts a d greater influence the second year than does the meal; COTTON FERTILIZERS 827 however, on sandy soils, most tests show the residual ef- fect of both cotton seed and cotton-seed meal to be slight. It seems safe to conclude that on most soils half a ton of medium or high-grade cotton-seed meal is about equal as fertilizer to a ton of cotton seed. Cotton seed may be applied in deep furrows in January without much danger that they will grow. If applied late, they should first be either crushed or composted or subjected to a high temperature caused by allowing them to be moistened and heated in bulk. When the seed ger- minate, the fertilizing value is apparently decreased, but not lost. Further experiments on this point are needed. The oil is without value as a fertilizer, and the hulls contain but little plant-food. Therefore, the most com- plete value of the cotton seed is obtained by the public when the oil mill extracts the oil. / It has been shown that the meal and hulls from one ton of cotton seed is at least as effective a fertilizer as the entire seed. Hence, the farmer who can exchange one ton of his seed for the meal and hulls contained in it, namely, about 750 pounds of meal and 800 pounds of hulls, loses nothing in fertilizing value. When the farmer can get 1000 pounds or more of meal and no hulls for one ton of seed, he usually makes a nearly equal exchange, if the cost of hauling be disregarded. He should usually obtain in exchange for a ton of cotton seed, considering only the fertilizing value, as many pounds of meal in excess of 1000 pounds as will pay for hauling both ways and whatever profit he may see fit to charge. 297. Other forms of nitrogen. — Whenever the nitro- gen in nitrate of soda is as cheap as that in cotton-seed 328 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS meal, the former may be profitably employed on cotton. The farmer should buy either nitrate of soda, cotton-seed meal, dried blood, or tankage, choosing that one in which a pound of nitrogen costs least. Most experiments fail to show any notable difference in the value of a pound of nitrogen from these different sources. 298. General need of cotton soils for nitrogen. — Cotton-seed meal or other nitrogenous fertilizer is highly beneficial to cotton on a large proportion of the culti- vated area of every region where the soils have become poor. Apparently it is almost universally needed on uplands in such regions except on (1) new grounds, and (2) on soils containing considerable vegetable matter, as the result of proper rotation with cowpeas, or other humus- forming crops. Although cotton-seed meal is almost universally beneficial, it is not always profitable when applied to cotton at the rate of 200 pounds or more per acre. Poor physical condition of the land, resulting in a scarcity of moisture in the summer, is the greatest hindrance to the profitable use of large applications of cotton-seed meal. But even with poor physical con- dition, it is usually profitable on soils where the stalk is small to supply nitrogen in the mixed fertilizer for cotton. 299. Cost of a pound of nitrogen. — A pound of nitro- gen in commercial fertilizers usually costs 15 to 18 cents. To learn the average cost each year, inquiry should be made of the State Commissioner of Agriculture, in the capital city of the state. 300. Fertilizing value of cotton-seed meal and hulls before and after being fed. — In an experiment at the South Carolina Experiment Station a definite amount COTTON FERTILIZERS 3829 of cotton-seed meal and hulls was fed to dairy cows, and every particle of the resulting manure was returned to the soil as fertilizer for cotton. An exactly similar amount of cotton-seed meal and hulls was applied directly as fertilizer for cotton. The yield of cotton was much greater where the manure was used. This was probably due in part to the quicker decay of the manure than of the meal and hulls. 301. A rational system of fertilization with nitrogen. — Considering permanent effect, as well as influence on the crop immediately following, the cowpea and other leguminous plants must be ranked as a cheaper source of nitrogen than is any nitrogenous material which may be bought as commercial fertilizers. The aim of the cotton farmer should be to grow such areas of legumes as will enable him to dispense with the purchase of nitrogenous fertilizers for cotton, using the funds thus saved to pur- chase increased amounts of phosphates or other necessary non-nitrogenous fertilizers. The money that would have been necessary to purchase one pound of nitrogen will buy about three pounds of phosphoric acid, or of potash, which larger purchases of phosphate and potash will enable the farmer to grow heavier crops of legumes. And heavier crops of legumes trap larger amounts of otherwise un- available atmospheric nitrogen and result in further soil enrichment and larger yields of cotton. PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZERS 302. Different kinds of phosphate. — While there are a number of forms in which the farmer may obtain phos- phoric acid, the one that is almost universally employed 330 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS in the cotton-belt is acid phosphate. This usually con- tains 14 to 16 per cent of available phosphoric acid, but both lower and higher grades than this may be obtained. Acid phosphate is manufactured by adding sulphuric acid to the finely ground phosphate rock, or raw phos- phate. The sulphuric acid is employed in order to make the phosphoric acid promptly available to plants. As the sulphuric acid has no fertilizing value, it serves to dilute the original phosphate rock. Hence, acid phos- phate usually contains only about half as large a percentage of phosphoric acid as the raw phosphate from which it was made. But nearly all of the phosphoric acid in acid phosphate is in a soluble or available condition. Raw phosphate consists of the finely ground phosphate rock without treatment with any acid. Among the names given to it are crude phosphate, ground phosphate rock, and floats. It usually contains from 26 to 30 per cent of total phosphoric acid. All of this is insoluble, and hence not in a form to be immediately used by the roots of plants. As ground phosphate rock contains about twice as much total phosphoric acid as does acid phosphate, and in some localities costs less than half as much per ton, it would be desirable to use the raw phosphate if it could be made available. 303. Effects of different phosphates on cotton. — Re- peated experiments in many states have shown. that cotton can make some use of raw phosphate, but that acid phosphate usually is much more effective. However, experiments have also shown that the raw phosphate becomes more quickly available if it is mixed with large COTTON FERTILIZERS 331 amounts of rotting vegetable matter. Hence, raw phos- phate mixed with stable manure is sometimes as effective as an equal weight of acid phosphate. The use of raw phosphate for cotton should probably be restricted to cases where it can be thus used with manure or leaf-mold, or to soils on which a large amount of vegetable matter is being plowed under. Even in the latter case acid phos- phate is usually the more profitable the first year. It is generally believed that the residual effects, that is, the effects subsequent to the year when it is applied, are greater with raw phosphate than with acid phosphate; but the difference in residual effect is not sufficient to overcome the usual greater efficiency of acid phosphate in the year in which it is applied. 304. Other sources of phosphoric acid. — Another source of phosphoric acid is slag phosphate; this is more available than raw phosphate. Still another source of phosphoric acid is ground bone, which is not extensively used by cotton growers. The principal phosphate mines are in South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida. Some authorities estimate that unless new phosphate mines are discovered, or the export of phosphate to foreign countries decreased, the supply of high-grade phosphate rock will be exhausted long before the close of the present century. This is one of the con- siderations that should lead farmers to utilize on the farm the substances rich in phosphoric acid. Richest of these are the bones of animals. Cotton seed, and all other seeds, contain considerable phosphoric acid, which is retained on the farm when these seed are there fed to live- stock. 332 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS The cost of available phosphoric acid in commercial fertilizers usually ranges around 5 cents per pound. 305. General need of cotton soils for phosphates. — The need for phosphate as a fertilizer for cotton is appar- ently almost universal on poor land east of the Mississippi River. Exceptions are found in some of the soils of the Central Prairie Region of Alabama and Mississippi, as well as in the similar area of black waxy soil in Texas. Phosphate is also often needed on the rolling cotton lands west of the Mississippi, that have sandy and loamy soils. PotrasH FERTILIZERS 306. Extent of the need for potash. — Potash is more abundant in Southern soils than is phosphoric acid or nitrogen. Therefore, most crops make less demand for potash in the fertilizer. Cotton agrees with most other crops in less frequently needing artificial supplies of potash, or in needing it in smaller amounts as a plant-food than the other two fertilizer constituents. This small demand for potash is notable in view of the fact that the entire plant contains about three times as much potash as phosphoric acid. The less frequent need for potash in the fertilizer seems to be due to the following causes : — (1) To relatively greater abundance of potash than of phos- phorie acid in the soils of the cotton fields. (2) Probably to the action of the ealeium sulfate (which con- stitutes about half the weight of acid phosphate), in rendering ayailable the potash of the soil. (3) To the fact that the seed and lint taken together remove nearly equal amounts of phosphorie acid and potash, thus first exhausting that one which is less abundant, — phosphorie acid. At all events, healthy cotton plants frequently fail to make COTTON FERTILIZERS 333 profitable use of potash. At the several experiment stations and substations in Mississippi and Louisiana its use was unprofit- able; the South Carolina and Georgia stations recommend it only in relatively small amounts; and the Alabama Station has found it often profitable, but more useful as a preventive of rust on certain soils than as an ordinary plant-food. 307. Potash as a means of checking cotton-rust. — On soils very liable to severe injury by attacks of cotton-rust the use of potash is recommended; for on such soils potash, ordinarily in the form of kainit, has conspicuously decreased the amount of rust and greatly increased the yields. Rust occurs most frequently on poor sandy soils, such as are especially common in the class known as the Norfolk soils, which constitute a large proportion of the area of the southeastern part of the cotton-belt. Hence, on such poor sandy soils, potash is more frequently than elsewhere needed for cotton. In several hundred local tests conducted by the Alabama Experiment Station, 100 pounds of kainit per acre has been highly effective in restraining cotton-rust, apparently about as effective as 200 pounds. In one test 60 pounds of kainit effected a noticeable decrease in the injury from this disease. Apparently it is safer to use at least 80 pounds per acre where the pur- pose is to combat rust. In the fertilizer experiments in Alabama two facts relative to kainit and cotton-rust are noticeable, viz. (1) the usual favor- able effect of kainit in checking rust, and (2) its occasional failure on some soils and in some seasons to reduce the injury resulting from this disease. Just how potash decreases rust is not well understood. It enables the cotton plant to remain green and thrifty through periods of unfavorable weather. Probably it 3834 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS reduces the amount of water necessary to keep the plant in health, judging by the fact that potash has been found to reduce the amount of water transpired by the leaves of the corn plant. Potash in the fertilizer usually causes the later retension in the autumn of the leaves of the cotton plant (Fig. 148). Fic. 148.— A Corton Frevp, showinc tap Errects or Portis IN RETENTION OF THE LEAVES. On the right, the fertilizer contained no available potash ; on the left, it contained 50 pounds muriate of potash per acre. 308. Kainit, muriate and sulfate of potash. — In ex- periments in Alabama, a pound of potash in the form of muriate was as effective in checking rust as when an equal amount was applied in the form of kainit. It is slightly less convenient to apply muriate of potash; for as this is four times as strong as kainit, it is advisable to use only COTTON FERTILIZERS 38a 25 to 50 pounds of the muriate per acre, which small amount necessitates extreme care in pulverizing and evenly distributing this fertilizer. Aside from this slight con- sideration of convenience, the farmer should buy that one of these materials in which a pound of potash delivered at his farm costs him less. Where the freight rate and cost of hauling is high, the muriate will be the cheaper source of potash; near seaport cities, or where freight rates are low, kainit may be the cheaper form. Kainit usually contains about 12 per cent of potash and muriate four times this amount. Another source of this plant-food is sulfate of potash, in which a pound of potash usually costs a little more than in kainit or muriate. The supply of potash salts comes from mines in Germany. MIscELLANEOUS FERTILIZERS, AND EFFECTS OF FERTILIZERS 309. Lime. — Lime has.shown very slight effect as a fertilizer for cotton in several tests in South Carolina and at Auburn, Alabama. At any rate, cotton is not con- spicuously a lime-loving plant, like clover, wheat, timothy, and the like. Neither is cotton averse to lime, as shown by its successful growth on numerous limestone soils. In the Gulf States there are considerable areas of slightly acid upland soils. On some of these a light application of lime may be found profitable in connection with other fertilizers. 310. Composts.— As the word ‘“ compost” is used by cotton planters, it usually refers to a mixture of stable manure, cotton seed, and phosphate, which, after being brought together, are allowed to ferment 4 to 8 weeks. ‘ 3836 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Other coarse materials, and also other chemical fertilizers, often enter into a compost. The theory underlying the making of composts is that during the fermentation, materials previously insoluble are decomposed and con- verted into a soluble condition. Taken as a whole, four experiments at the Alabama Experi- ment Station offer no argument in favor of composting such ma- terials as cotton seed, fine stable manure, cotton-seed meal, and acid phosphate. Nor do the experiments along this line made at other experiment stations sustain the claim that these ma- terials can usually be profitably composted for cotton when the price of this staple is low and labor expensive. With high- priced cotton and cheap labor, otherwise unemployed in winter, composting may be profitable. It is not contended that experiments have definitely settled the question against composting stable manure and cotton seed. The point is that convenience and cost of labor should be the chief considerations in determining whether the composting of fine stable manure, cotton seed, and acid phosphate is advisable. Conditions may justify the making of compost heaps when coarse litter of any sort, as oak leaves, pine needles, or coarse manure are obtainable at slight outlay for labor. There are also good reasons for placing in the compost heap such cotton seed as cannot be applied in the drill early enough to prevent germi- nation; many farmers find composting the most convenient means of killing the seed that are to be applied late in the season. The Furman formula for composting, very popular in the 1880’s and still used, consists of 750 pounds stable manure, 750 pounds cotton seed, 367 pounds acid phosphate, 133 pounds kainit. The chemicals and cotton seed are spread in alternate layers, the cotton seed being dampened and mixed with the phosphate and then with the manure. In four to six weeks the compost. COTTON FERTILIZERS 337 is removed in vertical layers, thus more thoroughly mixing the materials. In view of the present high prices of cotton seed, and with a view of utilizing cheap raw phosphate, the following formula for making a compost for cotton is suggested : — One load coarse stable manure, dampened, 300 pounds raw phosphate, One load leaf mold from the woods, or other litter. 311. Effects of fertilizers on maturity. — Cotton grow- ing on poor land is late in maturing, unless the process be hastened by the loss of leaves from rust, or by the pre- mature death of the plants. Acid phosphate decidedly hastens the maturity of cotton. Its use enables the farmer to obtain at the first picking, or at the first and second pickings, a larger proportion of the total crop of cotton than by the employment of any other single fertilizer. Other forms of phosphoric acid, including raw phosphate and basic slag, when used in connection with stable manure, have also been found to hasten ma- turity. At the Texas Experiment Station (Bul. 75) the plants fertilized with acid phosphate were 18 inches high when the plants on the unfertilized area and on the plots fertilized with nitrogen or potash were less than half that height ; at the time when the phosphate plants bore 8 to 16 squares each, the other plants averaged only about 4 squares. Nitrogen in commercial fertilizers in small or medium amounts somewhat favors early maturity. When a nitrogenous fertilizer is combined with acid phosphate, the highest degree of earliness is secured. On the other hand, ripening is retarded if the amount of nitrogen be - & 338 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS excessive or if a nitrogenous fertilizer be applied very late. It is a common observation that stable manure makes cotton late in opening. This can be overcome by caution in avoiding the use of excessive amounts and by supplementing the manure with any form of phosphate. The use of potash usually causes the crop to retain its leaves and to continue growing late into the fall. Hence, potash does not promote early maturity, but in judicious proportions in a complete fertilizer it does not exercise an injurious retarding effect. In North Carolina, C. B. Williams found that slacked lime hastened maturity when used in connection with a complete fertilizer. Commercial fertilizers, judiciously employed, constitute one of the most effective means of insuring the early open- ing of cotton, and thus of securing a crop before boll-weevils become so numerous as to destroy all young forms. By hastening the maturing of the cotton plant, commer- cial fertilizers have enabled farmers to grow cotton in higher latitude and in higher altitudes than was possible before their use became common. Effects of fertilizers on quality. —In Egypt, where a cotton of very long, fine staple is produced, attention has been directed to the effects of fertilizers on the quality of lint. Observations on cotton, growing in the rich soils of that country, indicate that heavy applications of fresh or unfermented barnyard manure, or other fertilizers promoting a very rank growth late into the fall, injure the quality of lint; while phosphates, whieh hasten maturity, Improve the staple. Partly on account of the more prompt action of nitrate of soda as compared with sulfate of ammonia or other nitrogenous ehemicals, the former is there given preference as a supplement to an application of manure. COTTON FERTILIZERS 339 LABORATORY EXERCISES 1. Assuming that nitrogen is worth 17 cents per pound, avail- able phosphoric acid 5 cents, and potash 5 cents, calculate the commercial value of the plant-food in a ton of fertilizer of the following composition : — (a) 10 per cent available phosphoric acid, 2 per cent nitro- gen, and 2 per cent potash; (b) 10 per cent available phosphoric acid, 3 per cent nitro- gen, and 3 per cent potash; (c) 5 per cent available phosphoric acid, 4 per cent nitro- gen, and 5 per cent potash. 2. Calculate the percentage of nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash in a mixture of 300 pounds nitrate of soda containing 15 per cent of nitro- gen; 500 pounds kainit, containing 12 per cent of potash; and 200 pounds of acid phosphate, containing 16 per cent of available phosphoric acid. 3. Calculate how many pounds of each of the three fertilizers just mentioned would be required to make a mixture containing the same amounts and kinds of plant-food as one ton of guano analyzing 10 per cent available phosphoric acid, 1.8 per cent nitrogen, and 2 per cent potash. 4. Calculate how many pounds of the same kind of phosphate and kainit as in (2) and of cotton-seed meal containing 2.8 per cent of available phosphoric acid, 6} per cent of nitrogen, and 1.8 per cent of potash, would be required to contain the same kinds and amounts of plant-foods as one ton of guano analyzing 10 per cent available phosphoric acid, 2 per cent of nitrogen, and 2 per cent of potash. LITERATURE Newman, J.S. Ala. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 5, 12, 22. BonpcrantT, A. J.,and Cuayton, J. Ala. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 34 and 42. 340 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Duaaar, J. F. Ala. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 78, 91, 103, 107, 113, 131, 145. Reppine, R. J. Ga. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 11, 16, 20, 24, 27, 31, 35, 39, 43, 47, 52, 56, 59, 63, 66, 75. Cauvin, M.V., and Kimsrovuegu, J. M. Ga. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 79. McBryvpeg, J.B. S.C. Expr. Sta., Bul. (New Series) No. 2, and Rpts. 1888-1889. Harper, J. N. S.C. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 145. Wiuurams, C.B. N.C. Dept. Agr., Bul. Jan., 1907; and Proce. Southern Asson. Commissioners Agr., 1909. Raleigh, N.C. Wuitr, H.C. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office Expr. Stas., Bul. No. 33, pp. 169-196. Wuirtney, Mitton. U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Soils, Bul. No. 62. CHAPTER XX COTTON—THE CULTIVATION OF THE AMERICAN UPLAND GROUPS THE modes of tilling and handling a crop of growing cotton, as of any other wide-area staple crop, come to be largely traditional and perfunctory. The fact that such labor is often left to ignorant or uninterested workmen tends to perpetuate this rule-of-thumb. Sometimes the methods are followed with the blindness of a superstition. The cotton-grower, however, must recognize that even the most common daily labor of tillage must rest on principles and reasons, if he is to secure the most satisfactory results ; therefore, this subject is worthy of careful and detailed consideration. 312. Disposal of litter. — Where cotton is the preced- ing crop, the first step in preparing the field for another crop of cotton consists in reducing the old stalks to frag- ments fine enough to be plowed under. This is most economically done by driving a stalk cutter (Fig. 77) along each row, the blades on the cutter chopping the stalks into short pieces. A more common method consists in beating the old brittle stalks with a heavy stick; this is best done during dry weather or on a frosty morning late in winter. Sometimes the stalks are lifted by a plow or by hand and then raked and burned. This latter course 341 342 SOUTHERN FIELD CKOPS should be avoided except when it may be made necessary by the presence of the cotton boll-weevil. 313. Methods of plowing. — The greater part of the area intended for cotton receives only one plowing before the seed are planted. This usually consists in forming ridges or beds. More thorough preparation may be given by first plowing the land level or flush, afterwards forming the beds by a subsequent plowing. The conditions under which this double amount of preparation, namely, first broadcast plowing and then bedding, is especially advis- able, are the following : — 1. When the soil is a stiff loam or clay inclined to form “clods ; 2. When the land has not been cultivated the preceding year, or when the preceding crop is one that has left much vegetation on the surface. The practice of plowing land twice for cotton, first fallowing it, and then throwing it into beds, is on the in- crease among the best farmers. ' 314. Time of plowing or breaking. — February and March are the months in which the greater part of the plowing of cotton land is performed. The time of plow- ing is largely a matter of convenience. The general rule should be that the larger the proportion of clay in the soil, the earlier may plowing be done to advantage, provided the surface be freshened later. The larger the amount of trash to be buried and rotted, the earlier should be the date of plowing. Some farmers begin plowing for cotton in December or even in November. This permits freezes to aid in pulverizing the soil and killing some kinds of eot- ton insects that spend the winter in the ground. 29 COTTON CULTIVATION 343 Early plowing may cause clay land to become too com- pact before the time for planting. In this case it is de- sirable, shortly before planting, either to replow the land or to loosen the surface with a disk-harrow. Too early plowing of sandy land increases the loss due to the leach- ing out of plant-food in the water that drains through the soil. Hence, sandy land, as a rule, is not plowed in the fall. However, it is good practice to plow any soils ex- cept the sandiest in the fall, provided some winter-growing crop, such as the small grains, or clovers, or vetches, are sown. The roots of the growing plants largely prevent leaching by appropriating the plant-food that becomes available as the vegetable matter decays. These green crops can be plowed under in the late winter or early spring, or grazed, or otherwise utilized. Plowed soil should be kept covered during winter with growing plants. Fields covered with cowpeas or other dead leguminous plants should not be plowed very early, since early fall plowing would induce rotting and leaching before the cot- ton plants would be ready to utilize the nitrogen made available by the decay of the legumes. A smali proportion of the area in cotton is plowed only a few days before planting. This incurs the danger that some of the seed may fail to come up in the loose soil, which quickly dries. 315. Depth of plowing. — A large proportion of the cotton fields are plowed only 3 to 4 inches deep. It is generally advisable to plow deeper than this, so as to afford a larger amount of available soil-moisture for the benefit of the plants in periods of dry weather, and to increase the feeding area for the roots. However, extreme depth, 344 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS as well as extreme shallowness, is to be avoided. Plowing too deep may bring to the surface much of the subsoil, where, for a year or two, it remains infertile and subject to baking or clod-forming. Moreover, the cost of very deep plowing is excessive. A depth of 6 to 8 inches may be regarded as unusually good preparation; this depth should be attained only gradually, that is, by plowing each year only about an inch deeper than the year before. By a gradual and judicious increase in depth, a few farmers have advantageously stirred their soil to even a greater depth than 6 to 8 inches. For very deep plowing the disk plow is a favorite implement (Fig. 80). When plowing is early, or several months before the time of planting the seed, the depth may well be greater than in late plowing. This is because the earlier plowing permits the upturned subsoil to be improved by the ac- tion of freezes and of the air, and because the deeper layer of stirred soil requires a longer time to settle to that degree of compactness most favorable to the germination of seeds and the growth of plant roots. Even when deep preparation fails to increase the yield the first year, an increase is apt to result in succeeding years. The aim of the cotton grower should be gradually to deepen the layer of plowed soil. 316. Subsoiling. — This term means the loosening of the subsoil without bringing it to the surface. It is usually accomplished by first employing an ordinary turn-plow, and then in its furrow running a special subsoil plow (Fig. 78). This latter plow has no moldboard, and merely loosens the subsoil, without displacing it. Subsoiling is a means of suddenly increasing the depth COTTON CULTIVATION 345 of loosened soil. The benefits from subsoiling, when done under the most favorable conditions, are the same as those that result from any form of deep plowing. However, subsoiling often fails to pay for the extra ex- pense, especially the first year. Some of the conditions under which subsoiling is often unprofitable are the follow- ing :— 1. When performed while the subsoil is too wet; often when the surface soil is dry enough for plowing, the wet subsoil is simply ‘‘ puddled,” or injuriously compacted by subsoiling. 2. Subsoiling is usually injurious when it is accom- plished so late that there is not afterwards sufficient rain to settle the disturbed subsoil and to destroy the large air spaces between the clods or small soil masses. As a rule the most favorable time for subsoiling in preparation for cotton is in the late fall or early winter before the lower layer of soil has been saturated by the winter rains. 317. Forming the ridge or bed. — Most cotton fields are prepared by throwing together at least four furrow- slices turned up by a moldboard plow. This forms a ridge or bed which is usually 3 to 4 feet wide, and several inches high. In regions where commercial fertilizers are used, there is first run a furrow in which the fertilizer is placed, and over which the bed is subsequently formed. This center furrow may be either (1) along the line of old cotton stalks, or (2) in the middle or water-furrow of the year before, or (3) it may be run in land already plowed broadcast. 346 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS When cotton follows cotton, the plowing to make a center furrow usually serves to lift out the roots of the old cotton plants. This is the first step in preparation and may be taken several weeks earlier than the other steps in plowing. oe In certain stiff lands where fertilizers are seldom used, it is a disputed point whether a center furrow is advantageous. Ex- periments on this point are too few to be conclusive. The use of a center furrow and the consequent deeper and more thorough Fic. 149.— A Minpie Burster, or Douste MoxtpBoarp PLow. preparation under the center of the bed is probably advantageous when plowing is performed early ; while if plowing is done imme- diately before planting, a center furrow may leave the soil too loose for the maximum germination of the seed, and for the best growth of the young eotton plants. In “‘bedding land” the first two furrows thrown together form a narrow ridge called a ‘‘list’’; the soil, from the hitherto unplowed strip, or ‘balk,’ is usually thrown against each side of the ‘list’? by a turn-plow. But this balk is sometimes split and thrown outward by a single trip of a double moldboard plow, called a ‘middle burster’’ (Fig. 149). ‘ COTTON CULTIVATION 347 318. Formation of beds by using a disk-harrow. — A saving of labor may be effected by forming the beds with a disk-harrow instead of with a turn-plow. The use of the disk-harrow for this purpose is practicable only on a field previously plowed broadcast. 319. Planting cotton level. — Practically all the cotton of the United States is planted on ridges or beds. How- ever, a few farmers, on well-drained sandy soil, plant late cotton on land that is not bedded, but merely ‘‘ flushed,” or ‘‘ plowed broadcast.” This requires very shallow planting, and also requires very careful early cultivation to prevent covering the plants. The object in planting on a level is to enable the plants better to endure drought. A method that is generally an improvement on the last named consists in forming low beds; before being planted they are pulled down almost level, by harrowing or drag- ging them whenever a crust forms or whenever young weeds appear. 320. Distribution of fertilizers. — The rows having been marked off, usually with a shovel plow, the fer- tilizer (if any is to be used) is drilled in this furrow. It is most conveniently put in place by means of a one-horse fertilizer distributor, which also draws earth over the fer- tilizer. Immediately a “list” is formed. The bed may be completed at once, or more frequently not until the entire area intended for cotton has been thus fertilized and listed. On some farms the fertilizer is distributed by hand, either through a “guano horn” or without this inexpensive device. 321. Time of planting. — The usual date for the begin- ning of cotton planting is two to three weeks after the 348 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS average date of the last killing frost in that locality. Planting begins in March near the Gulf of Mexico; it begins about April 1 in the central part of the Gulf States ; and in the extreme northern part of the cotton-belt it may be delayed until May. In the central part of the cotton-belt most of the crop is planted before May, but an occasional field is not planted until about the first of June. Extremely early planting increases the risk of injury by frost in spring and increases the labor of culti- vation. Rather early planting is advisable in regions where the cotton boll-weevil is present. Extremely late planting reduces the labor of cultivation and usually also reduces the yield, many of the immature bolls being destroyed by frost in the fall. 322. Cotton planters. — There are numerous forms of planters for cotton. Most of them plant a single row at a time, opening the furrow, dropping the seed, and covering the seed, at one trip (Fig. 150). Probably the most impor- tant features about a planter are: (1) provision for con- stantly agitating the mass of seed, so that the feed may be uniform, and (2) provision for rolling or otherwise pressing the soil around the seed. If the earth above the seed be rolled, or otherwise com- pacted, the depth of planting may be as shallow as one inch, The usual depth is from one to three inches. Some planters drop the seed at regular intervals rather than in a continuous drill. Such dropper-planters may require that the seed be first treated by some method that will serve to lay the fuzz and enable the individual seeds to be separated from the mass. This may be done by adding a little thin flour paste to the dry cotton seed while being shaken in a revolving barrel ; or, COTTON CULTIVATION 849 on a small scale, by dipping the seed in full strength commercial sulfuric acid, for about two minutes, which removes the fuzz. Immediately the sulfuric acid must be thoroughly washed off of the seed, so as to prevent loss of germinating power. The most common method of preparing the seed for very thin planting consists in ‘rolling the seed.”’ This is done by dampen- Fic. 150.— An INEXPENSIVE COTTON PLANTER. ing the seed, placing them in a barrel fitted with a frame and erank in such a way that it may be revolved; then dry ashes or dust is added, and the barrel revolved, thus causing the ashes or dust to coat each seed, and temporarily to paste down the fuzz. 323. Quantity of seed.— A bushel of cotton seed usually contains between 120,000 and 150,000 seeds, or enough, if each one developed into a mature plant, to suffice for fully fifteen acres. However, it is customary to plant 1 to 14 bushels of seed per acre. An ideal 300 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS planter that places the seed in a narrow drill or in hills requires less; and still less is required when planting is done by dropping the seed by hand in separate hills. On stiff land, it is regarded as advantageous to have a thick stand of plants, so that the combined strength of | the young plants may be exerted to break through the surface crust, which might be too strong for a single plantlet. On the other hand, the presence of only one seed in a place greatly reduces the labor of chopping or thinning cotton. 324. Broadcast tillage. — One change which should be made in cotton culture is the introduction of broadcast tillage; that is, of cultivation or tillage across the rows by means of weeders (Fig. 86) or of light, spike-tooth, adjust- able harrows (Fig. 85). This kind of tillage permits a larger area to be covered in a day’s work of man and team than does any other kind of cultivation. It has the double object of breaking the surface crust before this has become very thick and hard, and of destroying weeds and grass while they are extremely small or merely sprouting. One horse drawing a weeder, or a double team drawing a light, spike-tooth harrow, may cultivate ten or more acres in a day. As soon as a crust begins to form, there is need for the use of a weeder or light harrow at the following stages in the cultivation of cotton :— (1) A few days or weeks before planting, in order to break the crust and save the moisture for the germination of the seed soon to be planted. (2) Following a rain occurring soon after planting, which otherwise would leave too dense a crust to be easily broken by the young plants. COTTON CULTIVATION 301 (3) Between the time when the young plants first take on their green color and the time when chopping or thin- ning is done. However, it may be impracticable to use either weeder or harrow (1) on stony land, (2) on a field where there is much trash, and (3) where the stand is thin or very ir- regular. The judicious use of the weeder or light harrow just before chopping cotton permits this operation to be post- poned longer and to be effected with less labor. 325. First tillage by separate rows. — As soon as prac- ticable after all the young plants have appeared above ground and have taken on a green color, the first tillage is given with some form of cultivator. The principal objects of this operation are the following : — (1) To reduce the width of the strip that is subsequently to be thinned by the hoe; (2) To destroy vegetation; (3) To put the soil into the best condition for retaining moisture in dry weather and for the growth of the roots of the young cotton plant. 326. Narrowing the strip to be hoed. — Since the main purpose of this first operation is to prepare for the more expensive work of chopping, any implement now used must run very close to the line of young plants with- out throwing much earth toward them. Among the implements used in this operation, which is usually called scraping or barring off, are the following : — (1) Any ordinary cultivating implement supplied with a fender to prevent the rolling of too much soil on the tiny plant (Fig. 87); 852 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS (2) Implements supplied with small points on the side next to the cotton; (3) Moldboard- or turn-plows, with the bar side next the line of plants, so as to throw the soil away from the row. While the use of the turn-plow in this first cultivation by rows is perhaps more common than that of any other Fic. 151.— One Form or PLow-srocr. Showing handles, beam, and foot, to the lower part of which sweeps, scrapes, or other implements may be attached. implement, its use in “barring off” cotton is subject to the following objections : — (1) It leaves the young plants on narrow high ridges, which quickly dry out. (2) These narrow high ridges may crumble, pulling the plants down, if heavy rains occur. (3) The deep plowing by the turn-plow cuts many roots. COTTON CULTIVATION 853 Therefore, the turn-plow should be used for barring off cotton only under special conditions; for example : — (1) When grass has become too large to be easily killed by “scrapes ” or by other shallow-working implements. In this case the best means of killing the grass may be by burying it for a number of days, as is done by the moldboard plow. (2) The deep tillage, such as that given by the turn- plow, may sometimes be de- sirable on clay soils prepared early and subsequently very greatly compacted by rains, hence needing stirring after the plants come up. A widely used and gener- ally satisfactory implement for this cultivation or scrap- ing is a narrow sweep or scrape, especially when equipped with a fender. Such a cultivating imple- ment may be one of several similar points attached to a two-horse cultivator or to a one-horse cultivator, or it may be the sole point on an ordinary cultivating “stock,” or plow frame (Fig. 151). 24 Fic. 152. — A Youne Cotron PLant SHOWING Two SEED-LEAVES BELOW AND Two True LEAVES ABOVE. 354 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 327. Chopping or thinning. — As soon as possible after the operation of scraping or barring off, the plants (Fig. 152) should be thinned by means of a hoe. This first hoe- ing is called “chopping.” Usually either one or two plants are left at the desired distance apart. Much subsequent hoe work is saved if, at the time of chopping, the plants can be safely thinned to a single one at the required dis- tance apart. However, it may be wise to leave two or Fic. 153.— Various Forms oF SWEEPS AND SCRAPE USED IN CULTI- VATING COTTON. more plants in a place, or twice as many hills as will finally remain, if chopping is done when the plants are extremely small, or if many of the young plants are expected to die as the result of disease or of unfavorable weather. 328. Second cultivation or ‘“‘siding.’’— The objects in “ siding’ cotton are as follows : — (1) To throw close about the plant, for its firmer support, earth that may have been removed from it in the first cultivation or in hoeing. COTTON CULTIVATION 000 (2) To form a mulch that will retain the moisture in the soil layer just below it. (3) To destroy weeds. Since one purpose is to throw a little earth towards the plants, the scrape or sweep now used may be wider than that used at the first cultivation (Fig. 153). To prevent the small plants being covered, it may still be necessary to use a fender attached to the stock or cultivator (Fig. 87). This second tillage or cultivation is done by running the cultivating implement close on both sides of each row of plants. Hence, for scraping, two furrows per row usually suffice, where a single scrape or sweep is used. Siding should sometimes be done as soon as practicable after chopping. But in order to give time for grass to be smothered by the earth thrown on it in “ barring off,” sid- ing may be delayed. 329. Third tillage or cultivation, or ‘‘ cleaning middles.” —TIf the ‘siding’ just described has been performed with only two scrape furrows per row, there is usually left a low ridge of soil, called a ‘ balk” or “ middle,” halfway between each two lines of plants. If this strip becomes compact or weedy, the next step is to cultivate it. This is usually done by a single furrow of a rather large sweep or scrape, which splits the ‘‘ middle,” lapping part of it on each of the adjacent rows. When a double cultivator is employed, it cultivates the plants on both sides and throws out the “ middles”’ at the same time. Even when a single scrape is used in “siding,” farmers often prefer to throw out the ‘‘ middle” immediately. 330. Subsequent tillage. — The operation of “‘siding”’ is repeated as often as necessary to destroy all young weeds 356 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS and grass and to prevent the formation after each rain of a crust on the soil, which would hasten the loss of water by evaporation. Likewise, the middles are cleaned or thrown out as often as necessary for the same purpose. The larger the plant becomes, the wider, as a rule, are the scrapes or sweeps employed. It should constantly be borne in mind that one of the principal objects of tillage is to form a mulch of loose dry soil through which the moisture from the lower layers cannot rise and be evaporated. 331. Subsequent hoeing. — The hoeings subsequent to chopping are necessary only when vegetation grows along the line of plants in spite of the earth thrown upon the young weeds in siding. Hoeing is a cleaning rather than a true tillage or mulching process. Next to picking, it is the most expensive operation in cotton culture; hence, as far as practicable, the horse implements should be made to lessen the necessity of hoeing. 332. Amount and frequency of tilling. — There can be no fixed rule as to how often cotton should be cultivated. The general rule is to cultivate it before the formation of a crust following each rain. Four ‘ plowings”? may be considered the minimum and six or more are often advis- able. The total number of furrows per row required in good tillage is usually between twelve and sixteen. In addi- tion to this, two or more hoeings are usually given. 333. Late tillage. — Practice varies greatly as to the stage in the life of the cotton plant when cultivation should cease. In most parts of the cotton-belt, tillage is contin- ued through July and sometimes into August. The gen- eral rule is that cotton plants that are making less than COTTON CULTIVATION 857 a normal growth of limbs and foliage should be cultivated late, while plants of large size may be “ laid by ” earlier, so as to check the growth of stalk. After cotton has received what has been planned to be the last tilling, rains sometime occur within a few days, destroying the soil-mulch made by the last cultivation. In this case it is usually advisable to give an additional late cultivation, so as to reéstablish the soil-mulch, and to retain the moisture in the soil. At the final tillage of cotton, the middles are always thrown out. 334. Depth of cultivation.— The same principle applies here as in the tillage of any other crop. At the first culti- vation, the depth may well be shallow, medium, or deep, as the judgment of the farmer dictates. But in the sub- sequent tillings, the depth should be shallow ; that is, just deep enough to destroy vegetation and to form a soil-mulch thick enough to check evaporation. Usually a depth of 13 to 2 inches meets these require- ments. The finer the soil particles forming the mulch, that is, the more complete the pulverization effected by the tilling implement, the less the thickness of soil-mulch required to check evaporation. A three-inch mulch of small clods is less effective than an inch mulch of well- pulverized soil. 335. Sowing seed among growing cotton plants. — When it is desired to improve the soil by growing, during the cooler months, some soil-improving plant, such as crimson clover or hairy vetch, the time selected for sowing the seed is usually immediately after the first picking. By choosing this time, no cotton is knocked from the 358 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS plants by the one-horse cultivator used in covering these seed. On some farms fall-sown oats are sown among the growing cotton plants and covered as just indicated. To permit the use of harvesting machinery in the oats, the cotton plants, if large, are loosened in winter by means of'a narrow plow, or by the use of a subsoil plow, and then pulled and removed. 336. Distance between rows. —In deciding on the space between rows and between plants of cotton, the general rule is as follows: The richer the land, the wider must be the rows and the greater the distance between plants in the row. This rule is exactly the opposite of the practice in spacing Indian corn. The reason for planting cotton farther apart on rich land is the fact that cotton is a branching or spreading plant, and hence on rich land requires much space for the outward growth of its long branches. On the other hand, corn has no branches and may be crowded as closely together as is permitted by the supply of plant-food and_ of moisture, both of which are of course more abundant on rich land. The usual distance between rows of cotton on upland, where a crop of one half bale or less per acre is expected, is 3+ feet. On highly fertilized upland, the distance may well be increased to 4 feet. On bottom land and other very rich land, a distance of 5 feet is advisable, and oeca- sionally even wider rows are preferable. The wider the rows can be made without reducing the yield, the cheaper is the cost of cultivation, since work with cultivators is cheaper than work along the rows with the hoe. COTTON CULTIVATION 359 337. Distance between plants in the row. — Much of the cotton grown in the United States is unduely crowded in the row. A distance of 12 inches may be regarded as the minimum even for very poor land. With almost any character of medium or fair soil, capable of producing one half bale of cotton or more per acre, it is usually better to space the plant at least 18 inches apart. To increase this distance beyond 2 feet is usually unwise, except when the soil is very rich; in this latter case, it is better to increase the width of the rows than to space the plants much more than 2 feet apart. By giving ample distance between plants in the drill, the num- ber of bolls per plant is greatly increased. Thus on well-fertilized land, plants spaced 1 foot apart averaged 12.6 bolls per plant, while with double this space, there was an average of 40 bolls per plant. (S. C. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 140.) In this case the number of bolls per acre and the yield were much greater with the thinner planting. 338. Results of distance experiments with cotton. — Most of the experiment stations in the Southern States have conducted experiments ori this subject. Naturally the results have varied greatly as influenced by differences in soil, in fertilizer, in rainfall, and in the variety of cotton under observation. In a series of experiments at the Georgia Station, where the yield was a little more than a bale per acre, slightly higher yields were made where the plants stood 1 foot apart than where they were 2 feet apart; a distance of 3 feet between plants afforded a slight reduction in yield; and where the space between plants was increased to 4 feet, the yield was notably decreased. In the Piedmont region of North Carolina the King variety made as the average of a five years’ test the greatest yield when 360 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS the plants were spaced 16 inches apart, the rows being 3} feet wide; in rows 4 feet wide, larger yields were obtained when the spaces between plants were 12 or 16 inches than when the space was greater. In the coast region of North Carolina at the Edgecomb Test Farm, nearly similar results were obtained with the Russell variety. LABORATORY EXERCISES The laboratory work to accompany this chapter should con- sist of participation in any of the operations connected with cot- ton culture that may be in progress at the time this subject is studied. In case this is not practicable, field observations on the results of such operations should be made by the student and presented to the instructor in the form of descriptions or drawings. LITERATURE Duaaar, J. F. Ala. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 107. Reppine,R. J. Ga. Expr. Sta., Buls. Nos. 43, 47, 52, 56, and 59. MacNoipsr, G. M., and others. N.C. Dept. Agr., Bul., Feb., 1909. McBryvpe, J.B. S.C. Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 2. Hammonp, Harry. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office Expr. Stas., Bul. No. 33, pp. 225-278. Burkett, C. W., and Pos, C. H. Cotton, pp. 147-168. New York, 1906. Mercigsr, W. B. Bailey’s Cyclo. Agr., Vol. II, pp. 257-258. CHAPTER XXI COTTON — HARVESTING AND MARKETING PIcKING, ginning (removing the lint from the seed), baling, and compressing into very hard and compact bales for long-distance transportation are the different processes in the harvesting and marketing of cotton; and to these is here added a brief discussion of grades, qualities, and market classes. 339. Picking. —The picking of the crop is the most expensive operation connected with cotton culture. The price paid varies greatly, but is usually between 40 and 75 cents per one hundred pounds of seed cotton. This is equivalent to about 1} to 2} cents per pound of lint, or $6 to S11 per bale. In localities where labor is scarce or expensive, the cost of picking is sometimes even above the highest figure just mentioned. Picking begins in August or early in September. The greater part of the crop is picked in the months of Sep- tember, October, and November. In some localities con- siderable cotton is picked in December and a small amount sometimes remains in the field until after Christmas. A fair day’s work for an experienced picker is 150 to 200 pounds of seed cottcn; but very skillful pickers, under special incentives, and for a single day at a time, have picked more than double these quantities. 361 362 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Pia. 154. —An ALABAMA CorTron Fistp THAT YIELDED ABOUT Two AND ONE-HALF BALES PER ACRE. COTTON HARVESTING 365 In picking, the principal aims are : (1) rapidity of work, (2) the inclusion of only the minimum amount of trash, and (3) com- pleteness of work, so as not to leave in the bur an occasional lock or piece of a lock. In connection with the latter aim it should be borne in mind that it is sometimes more profitable to leave unpicked a lock of stained or diseased cotton than to in- clude it with the main picking, since it would tend to lower the quality of the entire lot, and to perpetuate disease if the seeds are used for planting. When locks lying on the ground where they have been stained by dust or mud are included with the main picking of white cotton, the selling price of the whole is lowered. It pays to harvest stained cotton separately or else to leave it unpicked. Cotton picked while wet, unless afterwards very thoroughly dried, makes a poor staple, which sells at a reduced price, because of the fibers broken in ginning damp cotton. Yields. — The average yield per acre in the United States is about 200 pounds of lint, or two-fifths of a bale per acre. How- ever, more than a bale per acre-is often grown in productive fields. Occasional yields of more than two bales per acre are obtained (Fig. 154). 340. Mechanical cotton-pickers. — The models in the Patent Office at Washington show that numerous cotton- pickers have been invented and that most of these have never been brought into use. However, within the first decade of the twentieth century several cotton-picking machines have demonstrated that they can pick large quan- tities of cotton, that they can harvest 80 to 90 per cent or more of the cotton open at the time of operation, and that they can pick without including very much more trash than that included by careless hand-picking. Many of these mechanical pickers are only partly auto- matic, and require human brains and hands to guide the separate picking devices. SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS 3864 “MUOAL LV UGMOIG NOLLOD LGAVV]]-HOIMSUOM AH — ‘SST “OT COTTON HARVESTING 369 Some of these machines operate on the suction principle; the open end of a hose pipe is directed by the human hand close to each open boll, when the suction created by a revolving fan on the machine draws the seed cotton through a tube and into a hopper. An example of this class of suction machines is the Worswick-Haardt picker, invented by J. E. Worswick, Mont- gomery, Alabama (Fig. 155). Other mechanical pickers entangle the seed cotton by means of innumerable sharp, tack-like points embedded in narrow re- Fic. 156.— THe Dixie Corton Picker. volving belts, which are directed by human hands into contact with the open boll; the lint is instantly entangled and borne along the revolving belt to the hopper, where it is removed by brushes. An example of such a machine is the Lowry Cotton Picker, invented by George A. Lowry, Boston, Massachusetts. Among other mechanical cotton-pickers recently advertised are the following : — The Dixie Cotton Picker, invented by John F. Appleby, Chicago, Illinois (Figs. 156 and 157). 366 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS The Oliver Cotton Picking Machine, advertised by Stern & Sons Company, Chicago, Lllinois. The Thurman Vacuum Cotton Picking Machine, manufac- tured by Vacuum Cotton Picking Machine Company, St. Louis, Missouri. The Price-Campbell Cotton Picking Machine, invented by Angus Campbell, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, and exploited by Theodore Price, New York City. It seems safe to predict that the time is near at hand when cotton-picking machines will harvest a part of the crop where Fig. 157. —VerticaL Section turoucu Dixie Cotron Picker WHEN Avr WorK. the conditions for their work are most favorable and where labor is scarce or expensive. The chief difficulty in the way of their rapid introduction is the high price at which it is now proposed to sell these mechanical pickers. 341. Ginning. — After being picked, the seed cotton is hauled to the gin, which is usually a public ginnery, oper- ated by steam power (Fig. 158). There suction pipes lift it from the wagon, and suitable devices carry it through COTTON HARVESTING 361 a cleaner, and thence through the gin, which breaks the lint from the seeds by means of circular saws which re- volve at a speed of about 400 to 500 revolutions per min- Fic. 158.— Section THROUGH A GINNERY. Showing four gins, press, suction pipe, and shafting. ute (Fig. 159). A brush removes the lint from the saws and passes it to a condenser, which presses it into layers. Cotton ginned when damp affords a poor sample be- cause the gin cuts a considerable proportion of the fibers. It is generally believed that a better grade or sample is afforded by storing the seed cotton for a few weeks than by ginning it soon after picking. 342. Baling. — The fleecy staple is then carried to the press and compacted into rectangular (so-called ‘“ square ”’) bales, which usually weigh about 500 pounds each, or about 14 pounds for each cubic foot. 368 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS MOTE BOARD Fic. 159.— TRANSVERSE SECTION THROUGH A CoTron GIN. COTTON HARVESTING 369 The bales are covered with heavy coarse cloth or ‘ bag- ging.” One of the greatest wastes connected with the growing and marketing of cotton in the United States is the failure to use a sufficient amount of bagging and of a quality suitable to prevent the staining of the outer layers of the staple with mud and dust. The amount of tare (or weight of bagging and ties) which the trade is supposed to allow is 30 pounds on a 500-pound bale; but only on a few bales do the bag- ging and ties weigh this much, and these are penalized or ‘‘docked”’ ; the interest and influence of local buyers is in favor of a light or deficient covering. A general improvement in the amount and quality of covering of the bales of American cotton, which are now more poorly protected than those from any other part of the world, would, in time, redound to Fic. 160.— Foreicn anp the profit of both the farmer and the A™#8IcAN CoTron Baues. spinner (Fig. 160). Showing on the right the The round bale, on the otherhand, ‘§fetior covering and torn E ? condition of an American is usually covered very completely jojo, in contrast with the with cotton cloth, which affords better covering of the foreign satisfactory protection. Moreover, bale on the left. the round bale is dense and requires no further compression. But for various reasons the round bale has not been able to come into general use in the face of opposi- tion in the interest of compress men and manufacturers of square- bale presses. The round bale usually weighs about 250 pounds, or half as much as the square bale. 243. The cotton gin. — There are two main types of gins, roller and saw gins. The former are used in ginning Sea Island cotton, the naked seeds of which are easily 2B 3870 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS separated by rollers from the lint. This general type of gin has been in use in India for centuries. - The saw gin, employed to gin short-staple cotton, is a modern machine, which has been second to no other agri- cultural invention in its effects on the world’s wealth, commerce, and comfort. The saw gin has made possible the South’s greatest industry, — cotton culture, — and has supplied with fleecy food the textile industries of all manu- facturing nations. It was invented by Whitney and Holmes about 1792. Before that time a laborer with his fingers separated about one pound of lint cotton per day. A single gin of average size accomplishes the work of about 4000 such laborers. Within one hundred years after its inven- tion the saw gin made possible & four-hundred-fold increase in the cotton crop of the United States. The saw gin is also used in ginning long-staple upland cotton; but to do this without injury to the staple, the usual speed of the saws should be greatly decreased. When long-staple upland is ginned, care should first be taken to remove from the gin the roll of cotton left by the preceding bale of short-staple; for the mixing of even a little of this with long-staple cotton greatly lowers the selling value of the latter. This is because the spinning machinery in any one mill is arranged for a fiber of a definite length; the admixture of fibers of widely different lengths results in loss to the spinner, either by fibers wasted or by the making of thread of undesirable quality. 344. Care of baled cotton. —Since cotton does not readily absorb large amounts of moisture, farmers and warehousemen often leave bales of cotton exposed for weeks or months to the weather (Fig. 161). This results in darkening and weakening the fibers in the outer layers, and consequently in a decreased selling value. Cotton COTTON HARVESTING 3871 bales should be kept continuously under shelter. If it becomes necessary to leave them uncovered, they should Fic. 161. — Cotton Bates terr UNPROTECTED FROM RAIN. rest on poles or timbers laid on the ground, so that no part of the cotton bale touches the moist soil. 345. Compressing. — Most cotton that is to be ex- ported, or transported great distances, is first shipped to ““ compresses,” where the size of the bale is still further reduced by the application of enormous pressure (Fig. 162). In some processes now coming into use, cotton, as soon as ginned, is immediately compressed : } On left, ordinary square bale ; in cen- into bales of very great ter, bale from gin compress; and on density ready for export. right, ordinary compressed bale. Fic. 162. — Sipe View oF Cotton BALEs. 372 SOUTUERN FIELD CROPS One great advantage of thus compressing it at the gin is the more complete and careful covering of the bale with new, closely woven cloth (Fig. 163). On the other hand, Fic. 163.— Bates rrom A GIN ComMPREss. the ordinary compress utilizes a part of the coarse, heavy, and usually cut or torn covering that was originally placed on the bale at the gin. 346. Commercial classes or grades of cotton. — Cotton is bought and sold according to quality or grade. When farmers sell, unless the number of bales be very large, a decision as to the grade or quality is usually made by the buyer, the seller being ignorant, as a rule, of the exact quality of cotton that he is selling. To better enable farmers to know what grade of cotton they sell, most agricultural colleges in the cotton-belt now employ ex- COTTON MARKETING 873 perts to give instruction in cotton-classing to those stu- dents who are pursuing an agricultural course. In large transactions, especially between business firms or corporations, experts representing both parties pass judgment on the grade, and any difference in classification is arbitrated by disinterested experts. The classing of cotton cannot be learned without prac- tice under an expert, and never very quickly. The basis or starting point is middling cotton. Contracts are based on this grade, and if other grades are delivered, the differ- ence in grade is settled in cash. The seven principal or “full” grades of cotton, mentioned in order of value, are the following : — (1) Fair (4) Middling (2) Middling fair (5) Low middling (3) Good middling (6) Good ordinary (7) Ordinary Between each pair of the full grades mentioned above, are the “half grades,” designated by prefixing the word “strict? to the name of the next lower grade; thus strict middling is a half grade better than middling. In the larger markets use is also made of the “ quarter grades,” indicated by prefixing the word “fully” or “barely ” before the term indicating the grade. The grades “ fair”? and “ middling fair” are compara- tively rare. The greater part of the crop of the Southern States usually consists of the following grades and half grades arranged in order of value : — Strict good middling, Strict middling, Good middling, Middling. 3874 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS In years when continued rains occur during the fall, the crop may consist largely of the following still lower grades : — Strict low middling, Low middling. The grade of cotton is determined by a number of con- siderations, which have somewhat different weights in different markets. In general, the grade depends prin- cipally upon (1) the abundance of trash, (2) the color of the fiber, and (3) the amount of “ nep,” or tangled, im- mature fibers. In general, the grades from best to lowest are supposed to express in some measure a decreasing percentage of waste material in spinning. The preferred color is snow white or slightly creamy, that is, with the faintest suggestion of a yellowish cast. In this matter of color, different markets vary. All mar- kets, however, rate low the samples of cotton which pos- sess even the faintest suggestion of blue, which is a qual- ity usually due to long exposure of the open cotton to the weather, and hence an indication of weakness of fiber. Strange as it may seem, length of fiber does not usually greatly influence the grade. But this does determine the price; length of staple is considered as “ spinning quality ” or “ character,” and is independent of the grade. Thus there is middling cotton of the ordinary short-staple kind, middling ‘ benders,” and middling long staple, the three selling at widely different prices. 347. Tinges and stains. — If lint cotton shows patches of faint color, it is designated as “ tinged’; if the color is decided and distinct, it is classed as “ stained.’ Both COTTON MARKETING 375 tinges and stains are usually due to contact with red or other strongly colored soil or to injured bolls. The price of stains is somewhat below that of tinges, and consider- ably below the price of unstained or white cotton of other- wise the same grade. This emphasizes the folly of allow- ing pickers to mix with white cotton the stained locks that are usually found lying on the ground. 348. Differences in value between the commercial grades. — There is no fixed difference in the value of any two grades. The demand determines this difference, which varies from year to year. Usually the following general statements hold true: — (1) The difference in price between any two adjacent grades of good cotton is less than between any two of the lower adjacent grades. (2) When the greater part of any year’s crop consists of the lower grades, the difference in price in favor of the upper grades is greater than usual, because of the strong competition, under these conditions, for the small amount of cotton of the upper grades. (3) As the average price of cotton rises, the difference in price between grades increases, because the lower grades entail a larger percentage of waste in spinning than do the better grades; this waste can ill be afforded when even low-grade cotton sells at a comparatively high price. The following categories give examples of approximate differ- ences in price that frequently prevail among the usual grades and half grades. The (+) sign indicates a price in cents per pound above that of middling, while the (—) sign indicates that the price is below the middling quotations : — eo aI a> SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Good middling . ....... . . + $ cent Strict middling . . . .... . . . +7 cent IVitd dite? Se. Ge 2s. Sen ike Va si es Se Ge O cent Strict low middling. . . . . . . . . — 4 cent Low middling . ....... . =. — $cent LABORATORY EXERCISES As part of the practice to accompany this chapter a ginnery should be visited, and inspection made of the parts of some gin while it is not in motion. While it is not advisable for instruction in cotton classing to be given by any except experts of long experience in cotton buying and classing, it may be possible for samples of middling cotton to be procured by the school and for the pupils to become somewhat familiar with its characteristics. College classes will doubtless be instructed by an expert, who will need a complete set of specimens, or types, which can usually be purchased from the U. 8. Department of Agriculture. LITERATURE Hunt, T. F. Forage and Fiber Crops in America, pp. 364-378. New York, 1907. Burkett, C. W., and Por, C. H. Cotton. New York, 1906. Tompkins, D.A. Cotton and Cotton Oil. Charlotte, N.C., 1901. Rosinson, T. A. Classing Cotton. Stillwater, Okla., 1909. Miuter, T. 8. The American Cotton System. Flat, Texas. Hammonp, Harry. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office of Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 33, pp. 264-268 and 351-384. Earte, D. E. Cotton Grading. Clemson (S.C.) Agr. Col. Exten. Work, Vol. IV., Bul. No. 2. CHAPTER XXII COTTON — HISTORY AND STATISTICS Corron appears to be a native of the tropical parts of both hemispheres. The cotton plant was grown in India many centuries before the beginning of the Christian era. Until about a century ago, India continued to produce most of the world’s supply of cotton; it now ranks as second only to the United States in the amount of cotton produced. Gradually the cultivation of cotton spread from India until at least small areas were grown in Egypt and other parts of northern Africa, in Spain (where cotton was probably introduced by the Moors), and in Italy. Egypt, now the third largest producer of cotton in the world, probably learned cotton culture at a much later date than did the inhabitants of India. England, which now manufactures more cotton than any other country, apparently did not manufacture cotton cloth until about the seventeenth century. 349. History in America. — Columbus found cotton growing in the West Indies in 1492, as did Cortez in Mexico in 1519. Indeed, at that time cotton constituted the principal clothing of the natives of Mexico. A few years later explorers found cotton growing in Peru and Brazil. It is interesting to note that the American Indians in- habiting what now constitutes the cotton-growing states of the Union appear to have been without cotton. But 977 ole 378 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS their contemporaries of nearly all nationalities to the southward grew and used this plant in countries where in modern times its culture has made relatively little progress. Cotton manufacturing was greatly stimulated by the inventions of Arkwright, Crompton, Cartwright, and Watt Fic. 164.— Tur Propei.tinc Mecuanism oF AN OLD Horse-POWER GIN. Showing large wheels with wooden cogs. (By permission of D. A. Tompkins.) in the eighteenth century. To supply the demand for raw cotton thus stimulated, cotton culture was extended in India, along the shores of the Mediterranean, and in COTTON STATISTICS B19 Brazil. At that time the southern part of the United States was producing only a few bales for export and not enough to supply its own people with cotton clothing. In 1764 the American colonies shipped eight “ bags” of cotton to Liverpool, and this probably represented the entire export of that year from the American colonies. 350. The invention of the cotton gin. —In 1793, Eli Whitney, then living in South Carolina, applied for a pat- ent on asaw gin. Prior to that time, hand-picking was the rule, and only a rude form of roller gin was known. The immediate effect of the invention of Whitney’s saw gin was greatly to increase the production of American cotton. In the period of 116 years, from the invention of Whitney’s gin to 1908, the cotton crop produced in the United States increased so that it was nearly six hundred times as large at the end as at the beginning of this period. Before the general introduction, in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, of public ginneries operated by steam, practically all of the crop was ginned on small plan- tation gins, propelled by six or eight mules driven in a circle (Fig. 164). 351. Value and extent of the American cotton crop. — The American cotton crop is usually between 11,000,000 and 13,000,000 bales. The area of cotton picked in 1909 was estimated at 30,938,000 acres. The lint and seed of a single crop are usually worth about $750,000,000. Less than two thirds of the lint is exported. Cotton shipped abroad, together with cotton-seed oil and meal, annually brings into the United States about $500,000,000, or more money than foreign nations send into this country for any other single crop. Moreover, the remainder of the crop 380 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS made into cloth in the United States supports one of the most important American manufacturing industries, the cotton textile industry. Year by year, cotton is coming into wider use. Pro- duction and consumption have both rapidly increased. The following table shows how rapidly the cotton pro- duction of the United States has increased : — YEAR Bates PropucEepD 1790 ie Ue eee) gen se. peek 8,889 1810 nth ath ety PSO a Ee Ie aeY as 269,360 1830 Se tis Ca ee mee ae ae eee OS On 1850 Sa Gs ee ah eh ap 4 1870 at he a ee ce He a AS OZSLT 1890 tie Seek sen ee ae 8,652,597 1908 is pkey aie aa Se te es 13 432,131 The production of cotton in the United States did not permanently rise above 1,000,000 bales until 1832, nor above 3,000,000 bales until 1851. The crop in round numbers was about 4,000,000 for each of the three years preceding the Civil War. During this war cotton culture was largely discontinued, the production dropping to 300,000 bales in 1864. Not until 1875 did the annual cotton crop remain per- manently above 4,000,000 bales. From the last table, it may be seen that during the greater part of the past century the annual cotton crop of the United States has practically doubled every twenty years. In very recent years the rate of increase has been slower. Neither the world’s market for cotton goods nor the productive capacity of the Southern cotton fields has nearly reached its limit. COTTON STATISTICS 881 352. Production of cotton seed. — For each bale of 500 pounds there is usually produced a half ton of cotton seed. The value of the seed produced in 1908 has been estimated! at more than $92,000,000. More than half of the cotton seed pro- duced are manufactured into cotton-seed oil, meal, cake, hulls, and linters, — the latter be- ing a very short, low- priced fiber adhering to the seed after ginning. The remainder of the crop is used as food for cattle, as seed for plant- ing, and as fertilizer. 353. Production by Fic. 165.— PeRcENTAGE OF THE TOTAL states. — Only ten = American Crop or Corton GROWN IN Americanstates produce E4c# Stats 1n 1908. large amounts of cotton (Fig. 165). These are the following, named in order according to the average percentage of the crops of 1906, 1907, 1908 produced in each state. « a ° x - ac So z 2 Si Sian Per CENT OF Grae Per CENT oF AMERICAN CROP AMERICAN CROP Texass3- sy a ee 270 Arkansas. . . . 7.3 Georgia . . . .143 Oklahoma . . . 6.6 Mississippi . . . 12.4 Louisiana . . . 5.7 Alabama .. . 9.8 North Carolina . 4.9 South Carolina. . 8.5 Tennessee . . . 2.5 Since Figure 165 gives the percentages for only one year, while the table states the average results for three years, the latter may 1U. 8. Bur. Census, Bul. No. 100. 382 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS be regarded as more reliable. Students will find it interesting to make three-year averages of the crops of still later years in order to note the tendency for cotton culture to increase in certain states and to decrease in others. Other states together produce about 1 per cent of the crop. In most of the states named above, cotton is the most valuable sale crop produced. The important cotton-growing states embrace less than one fourth of the area of the United States. Yet this small part of the country furnishes the most valuable article of export from the farms of the nation. Within the past few years the extension of cotton culture in Oklahoma has proceeded more rapidly than in any other state, thus raising this state to a higher position than it occupies in the above table. Reports of cotton ginned each year. —Both the Census Bureau of the United States and the Bureau of Statistics of the National Department of Agriculture devote much attention to the gather- ing of statistics relative to the production of cotton. Cotton crops grown in 1909, 1908, and 1907, expressed in running bales and in equivalent 500-pound bales, are given in the following table (Crop Reporter, Apr., 1910). ss 2UNNING B 1 | EB IT 5 z 5 RUNNING BALEs QUIVALENT 500-pounpD Bags STATE 1909 1908 1907 1909 | 1908 | 1907 United States . |10,363,240/13,432,131/11,32 5 Fs | e Alabama. 1,360,601] 1, 5! 1,056,097 Arkansas. 1,020,704 | 29,329 Florida 54,951 1,849,003 263, ue Mississippi . : 1,106,170 North Carolina 647,747 dy 668, 461 701,356 Oklahoma . . 571,370 South Carolina .| 1,160,167 Tennessee... 248,778 Texas. -| 2,549,417 All other States 62,664 + Counting round as half bales and including linters. COTTON STATISTICS 383 - The statistics in this report for 1909 are subject to slight corrections. Included in the figures for 1909 are 49,448 bales, which ginners and delinters estimated would be turned out after the time of the March canvass. Round bales included are 150,690 for 1909 ; 242,305 for 1908; and 198,549 for 1907. Sea- island bales included are 94,566 for 1909; 93,858 for 1908; and 86,895 for 1907. Linter bales included are 314,597 for 1909; 346,126, for 1908; and 268,060 for 1907. The average gross weight of the bale for the crop, counting round as half bales and including linters, is 496.5 pounds for 1909, compared with 505.8 for 1908 and 502.2 for 1907. The number of ginneries operated for the crop of 1909 is 26,660, compared with 27,598 for 1908.” 354. Distribution of cotton culture in the United States. — The northern line of the cotton-belt of the United States extends from near Norfolk, Virginia, in a southwesterly direction to the northeastern part of Georgia; thence in a northeasterly direction through Tennessee and into Kentucky, crossing the Mississippi River just south of the mouth of the Ohio. Thence the line extends almost directly west through the southern part of Missouri, excluding the northwestern part of Arkansas. The cot- ton-belt includes practically all of Oklahoma and all of Texas except the extreme western part. Small isolated areas producing small amounts of cotton are found in the irrigated regions of New Mexico, California, and other parts of the Southwest. Within the territory mapped as constituting the cotton- belt, a large proportion of the counties produce only a few thousand bales. These areas in which cotton is a relatively unimportant crop are, (1) the country along the northern edge of the cotton-belt, especially in mountainous sections ; (2) parts of the country on the Gulf coast where rice, sugar-cane, truck crops, and forest products supplant 384 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS cotton; and (3) the extreme western part of the cotton- belt, where the slight rainfall prevents the extensive culti- vation of this crop. 355. The principal foreign cotton-producing countries. — The United States produces about two thirds of the supply of cotton used in the world’s mills. Next to the United States, with its twelve to thirteen mil- lion bales per year, comes In- dia with an an- nual crop of about 3,000,000 bales, and Egypt with about 1,300,000 bales. 356. Countries producing small UNITED STATES 66.4 quantities of cot- ton.— Next, with Fic. 166. — PERcENTAGE oF WorLpD’s MILL SuPPLY much smaller or Corron CONTRIBUTED BY Eacu Counrry in quantities, come 1908. ‘ Russia and its Asiatic provinces, China, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Turkey, and Persia (Fig. 166). If account were taken of the unknown quantities of cotton that never reach the mills, but that are converted into cloth in the homes of the people of China, the Celestial Empire would probably rank above Egypt as a cotton- producing country. COTTON HISTORY 885 357. Competition in cotton culture. —It is often said that the United States has a practical monopoly of cotton culture. This is largely true, but changing conditions in all parts of the world make it possible for the foreign grower of cotton to become a more formidable competitor of the American cotton producer than has been the case in the past. The following facts suggest the possibility of constantly increasing competition from abroad : — (1) Great efforts have been made during the past few years, especially by the British and German governments in their African possessions, to build up centers of cotton production. These attempts, unlike those made during the Civil War, were made in countries believed to have climatic conditions well suited to the growth of the cotton plant. In some of these countries, notably in German East Africa, British East Africa, and Uganda, these efforts are resulting in a rapid increase each year in the number of bales pro- duced, which suggests that the climatic and other con- ditions are favorable. (2) A high price for American cotton always stimulates foreign cotton production. The American farmer expects high prices for cotton in the future, partly because of the injury inflicted on the American crop each year by the boll-weevil in its eastward march. The probable high prices would have the effect of increasing cotton produc- tion in Africa and Asia. (3) Improvement in the methods of cultivation in India can greatly increase the cotton production of that coun- try. Extension of the government’s irrigation system will have the same effect. Improvement in the quality 2c 886 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS of Indian fiber is possible. Moreover, even a cotton with _very short staple, as that of India, is indirectly in competi- tion with ordinary American cotton; for, being cheaper, it is used for many purposes where a staple of greater length could be employed. In 1910 (as a result of a short Ameri- can crop, with consequent high prices) a small amount of Indian cotton was imported by American mills. (4) In Egypt the government is extending. the irriga- tion system, thus increasing the area of cultivated land, and making possible even larger yields per acre by reason of more frequent irrigation. However, Egyptian cotton is not directly in competition with American short staple. On the other hand, among the facts which suggest the freedom of the American producer from serious rivalry by the foreign cotton grower are the following : — (1) Stimulated by the high prices of cotton prevailing during and just after the Civil War, great efforts were made in numerous foreign countries to stimulate the pro- duction of cotton. As a rule these attempts were unsuc- cessful. (2) The southern part of the United States is believed to be the only very large area of country having climatic conditions throughout its entire extent exactly suited to the cotton plant. (3) India, the second in rank among cotton countries, produces chiefly a staple shorter than the American, and hence not generally used by the same mills. (4) The cultivated part of Egypt is a country of limited area; moreover, the staple produced is longer than the staple of the bulk of the American crop, and hence is used in different mills and for different purposes. COTTON HISTORY 387 358. Program for the American cotton grower. — The best steps for the American cotton grower to take in order to meet any foreign competition that the future may bring forth consist (1) in producing cotton by more inten- sive methods, which lowers the cost of producing each pound of lint, (2) in more largely employing machinery in the cultivation and harvesting of this crop, and (3) in improving the usual wasteful and slovenly method of covering and handling American bales. LABORATORY EXERCISES From the latest United States Census Reports on Agriculture, students should calculate : — (a) The proportion of the total crop produced by their state ; (6) The proportion of the crop of their state produced by their county ; (c) A list of the ten counties in their state producing the great- est number of bales ; (d) The average yield per acre of lint cotton in the United States. (e) The average yield per acre of lint cotton in five selected counties in their state. LITERATURE Burkett, C. W., and Por, C. H. Cotton, pp. 13-74, 301-329. New York, 1906. U.S. Census Bur. Latest Publications on Agriculture. U.S. Census Bur. Buls. Nos. 100, 107 and later. U.S. Dept. Agr., Office Expr. Sta., Bul. No. 33, pp. 13-66, 266- 270. U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. of Statistics, Bul. No. 16 and later. CHAPTER XXIII COTTON — INSECT ENEMIES Tuer most destructive insects attacking the flowers or bolls are the boll-worm and the Mexican cotton boll- weevil. Among the insects most injurious to the foliage are the cotton caterpillar. The cotton red-spider also injures the leaves, and on the young seedlings a plant-louse is sometimes troublesome. The roots are invaded by a very small animal called the nematode worm. The stems of the young plants are attacked by cutworms and the buds by cowpea-pod weevils. THE Cotron Bo.Lu-worm. — HELIOTHIS OBSOLETA 359. Life history of boll-worm. — The boll-worm is one of the most widely distributed enemies of cotton. The only parts of the cotton plant injured are the squares or bolls, which are eaten into and the interior destroyed by the caterpillar stage of a moth. Other plants that are much injured by the same worm are corn and to- matoes. (See corn ear-worm, paragraph 192.) The parent is a moth (Fig. 167) which may lay more than one thousand eggs. These are laid by preference on the fresh silks of corn, so that the young worm, as soon as hatched, may enter the tip of the ear, where it is commonly 388 COTTON INSECTS 389 known as the ear-worm. Eggs are laid on all parts of the cotton plant, but especially on the leaves. On hatching, the young worms, which are too small to be easily seen, wander about for a few hours or days, eat- ing small amounts of the surface tissue of the cotton leaves and of the tender growing buds. This is the period in the life of the insect on cotton when it can be most easily poisoned and controlled. On becoming strong enough to cut into a boll, the worm destroys the contents of one or more bolls (Fig. 168). On reaching full size, it drops to the ground, burrowing usually to a depth of two or three inches below the sur- face. Hereit remains Fic. 167. during the pupal stage (Fig. 169), while chang- ing to a moth. In most parts of the cotton region there are five genera- tions annually produced by the boll-worm, the first three Motus or Cotton BoLt-worM AND Corn Ear-worm. Showing the variations in color between different individuals. 890 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Tic. 168.— Tue Corron BoLtt-wormM oN THE OuTSIDE OF A Corron Bouc, The mass of insect castings near the top of the picture suggests the injury already done to the interior of the boll. of which usually feed upon corn. The first and second generations feed on the young leaves in the bud or growing part of the corn plant; the third generation preys chiefly upon the ears of corn in the green or roasting- ear condition, when the insect is known as the corn ear- worm or roasting ear-worm. This in- sect prefers corn to cotton. Hence it remains on corn as long as the ears are green. After the ereater part of the corn hardens, usu- ally in July, and after the third and more numerous generation of worms appears, severe injury is done to the squares and bolls of cotton. 360. Preventive measures.-— In spite of the great COTTON INSECTS B91 injury done to cotton, prevention or poisoning is seldom attempted. ExperimentS have shown that dusting the plants with a light application of Paris green or other preparation of arsenic destroys many of the tiny worms on the day on which they are hatched and before they are large enough to enter the boll. For poisoning to be most effective, it should begin about the time that adjacent corn ears begin to harden, and it may need to be repeated several times. The poison adheres better if applied while the dew is on the plants. The most generally practi- L cable method of reducing the Fic. 169.— Pupar or Curysatis injury to cotton consists in he re papier using corn as a trap crop. Strips of corn should be planted about the first of June, or at such times as to bring the corn into the roasting-ear condition about the first of August. Then the moths deposit their eggs on the corn rather than on the cotton plants. The trap crop of corn is still more effective if two plantings are made at intervals of a few weeks, so as to furnish a continual supply of roasting ears during the time when moths are most numerous. These strips of corn may be planted on oat patches adjacent to the cotton fields, or better, 2 to 4 rows of corn may be planted in alternation with 20 to 40 rows of cotton. In order for the corn to serve as a trap crop, it must be planted late, and not at the time when the cotton is planted. 392 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS Such corn may be cut and fed to live-stock when in the late roasting-ear condition; or it may be left in the field as usual. In this latter case corn is still help- ful in reduc- ing the num- ber of boll- worms, since it attracts a number of worms to each ear. Here they devour each other, leaving only one or two alive, instead of many. Plowing in late fall or early winter destroys the burrows (Fig. 170) in which the insect passes the winter, and turns the pup up to be killed by unfavor- able weather. Fic. 170.— Pura or Bort-worm In its UNDER- GROUND Burrow. Tue Mexican Corron Boui-wEEviu. — ANTHONOMUS GRANDIS 361. Extent of injury. — The boll-weevil is the most destructive insect enemy that has ever attacked cotton in the United States. When it first invades a new region it sometimes reduces the total production of cotton by eo COTTON INSECTS 393 about 50 per cent. Such an enormous reduction as this is not due solely to the smaller amount of cotton produced per acre, but is partly due to reduction in acreage. For- tunately in most of the country west of the Mississippi River, where the boll-weevil has been present for a longer time than anywhere else in this country, farmers, within a few years after the arrival of this pest, have learned to change their methods so as to regain a part or all of this loss. However, even before the ; boll-weevil had extended beyond Texas and Louisiana, the injury to the cotton crop was estimated at more than $22,000,000 in one year. 362. Food of the weevil. — The injury done by this insect is practi- cally confined to the squares and bolls. The squares are decidedly preferred, and as long as these are Fic. a present in abundance but little ,. He arene gee damage is done to the larger bolls. at the outer end of the This preference for the squares, 2st joint of the front legs. Pe ie 1 (Photo by W. E. Hinds.) rather than for the older forms, makes it possible for farmers to grow cotton in spite of the boll-weevil. This is done by hastening the early growth of the plants so that many bolls will form and pass the danger point before the weevils become very numerous. After the weevils become very abundant in August, they sometimes destroy every square in a field, so that no late blooms appear. The injury is effected both by the mature weevil (Fig. | 171), feeding from the outside of the square or boll, and by . 394 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS the grub or larval stage within (Fig. 172). The mature in- sect can live for a short time on the tender leaves or grow- Fic. 172.— Cotton Square sHOWING BoLL-wEEvIL Larva IN PosiTIon. Natural size. ing buds of the cotton plant, a fact which is important to remember in considering means of combating this pest. The cotton boll-weevil does not eat any plant that is widely grown except cotton. This fact is utilized by de- priving the insect, late in autumn, of green cotton plants, its only food. COTTON INSECTS 395 363. Stages in the life of the boll-weevil. — In the life of the cotton boll-weevil, as in that of most other insects, there are four stages. These are, (1) the egg; (2) the lar- val, or grub stage, which is the growing period; (3) the Fic. 173.— Puncturep Cotton Square. Showing egg puncture of boll-weevil and ‘‘ faring”’ of bracts. pupal, or changing stage, in which this insect is compara- tively inactive and in which no food is taken; and (4) the adult or mature stage, which, with the boll-weevil, is the period of activity and of egg-laying. 364. How the injury is done. — Injury to the forms, 396 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS or young fruits, of the cotton plant are due both to pune- tures made by the mature weevils for the purpose of ob- taining a food supply for themselves, and to the young grubs, which develop within the square or boll where the ege has been laid by the mature weevil. A few days after an egg has been laid in a square, the color of the latter becomes paler, and the surrounding leafy parts flare, or spread outward (Fig. 173). The square may remain hanging on the plant or it may drop to the ground, carrying the larva or grub within. It was found in experi- ments in Texas that among the immature insects in the fallen squares, about one third developed into adult weevils. The remainder were killed by their insect enemies or by the rapid drying of the squares where they lay in strong sunlight on the hot soil. The dead squares that continue to hang to the plants bring forth a larger proportion of mature weevils than do the fallen squares, probably because in the hanging squares larvee are less exposed to the attacks of their principal insect enemies, the ants. Hence some farmers attempt to brush off as many of these infested squares as possible, by attaching a brush, or a stick wrapped with cloth, to the cultivating implement. Some authorities regard this as impracticable. The larvee developing within the bolls may result in the destruction of only one lock or of the entire boll. Feeding punctures may cause the square to die or the boll to rot. 365. Rapid multiplication. — One of the reasons why the cotton boll-weevil is destructive is because it multi- plies very rapidly. The time from the laying of the eggs COTTON INSECTS 397 to the appearance of the mature weevil is less than 25 days. Hinds and Hunter have estimated that the average time between the egg-laying period of any two genera- tions is about 43 days, and that a single pair of weevils coming from their winter quarters in the latter part of spring in Southern Texas, may there, before the occur- rence of frost, have 250,000 living descendants. In south- ern Texas there may be as many as five generations; but in the part of the cotton-belt farther north it is probable that the usual number of generations averages four per year. 366. Where the winter is spent. — The boll-weevil passes through the winter in the mature or weevil stage. Therefore the most effective means of fighting the boll- weevil aim at reducing as low as possible the number of adult weevils that live through the winter. Fortunately, of the weevils that go into winter quarters the greater portion die before spring. In Texas and Louisiana the percentage of weevils living through the winter has varied from less than 1 per cent to more than 50 per cent of those that entered winter quarters. The proportion of those that survive can be largely reduced by the destruction of the trash under which they usually take shelter through- out the winter. The hiding places preferred are: (1) in the empty cotton burs and in other litter in the cotton field; (2) in the fallen leaves and in the bark and moss of the woods; (3) in corn stalks, grass, blackberry patches, and other litter or vege- tation adjacent to the cotton fields; and (4) around and in buildings and haystacks. All of this suggests the need of plowing under deeply, 398 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS or otherwise destroying, as much as practicable of the litter and vegetation adjacent to cotton fields and the advisa- bility of keeping the fields in a clean and neat condition. 367. Principal preventive measures. — The boll-weevil in its different stages spends most of its life within the cot- ton forms, and when outside it takes so little food from the surface of boll or square or leaf, that the use of poisons (except in one special case, as indicated below) is useless. The warfare against this pest must be an indirect one, and its aim should be to prevent many insects from living through the winter. When cold weather approaches, or on the occurrence of a killing frost, boll-weevils enter their winter quarters under all sorts of trash. Experiments have shown that if the weevils can be deprived of their food for a period of several weeks before cold weather occurs, they will be so weakened that most of them die before spring. Hence the best method of reducing the injury in the next crop of cotton consists in plowing, piling, and burning in Oc- tober, or as soon as possible, the old cotton stalks and all litter adjacent to the cotton fields. Even later burning is beneficial, though to a less extent. Burning the stalks and burs destroys the immature insects inside the bolls and squares, destroys many of the adult insects, and deprives the remainder of food and shelter. Preparatory to being burned, the cotton stalks are usu- ally uprooted with a double moldboard plow. pounds of nitrogen, 15 pounds of phosphoric acid, 32 pounds of potash, and 46 pounds of ime. Most of the lime and potash is con- tained in the hay, while the greater part of the phosphoric acid and more than half of the nitrogen are found in the nuts. 445. Soils. — A sandy or sandy loam soil is preferred. Nuts of the highest market quality, that is, with the brightest shells, are produced on light-colored, sandy soil. Red or dark soils, especially when containing much clay, stain the hulls, and hence reduce the market price. Such soils, however, are fully as good for peanuts that are to be consumed on the farm. While a stiff soil is usually avoided for peanuts, — partly because of the staining of the shells and partly because peanuts cannot be erazed by live- stock on such soils while wet, — yet these heavier soils some- times make larger yields of nuts than do very sandy fields. In the choice of soils for peanuts it must be constantly remembered that a loose, friable condition of the surface layer is necessary in order that the “ pegs,” from which the pods will develop, may easily enter the soil. PEANUT 467 446. Liming soils. — A considerable amount of lime in the soil increases the yield. However, the percentage of lime in the soils of the eastern peanut region is low, so that this element is usually supplied artificially. The absence of lime is generally believed to be one of the causes leading to a large proportion of ‘‘ pops,” that is, shells without nuts. Potash is said to reduce the number of “pops.” Probably one of the good effects of lime is its well known effect of making available the potash in the soil. On soils extremely deficient in lime, as are most light-colored, sandy soils, an application of lime is usually advantageous. A minimum of 10 bushels or a maximum of 50 bushels of slaked lime per acre may be used. The smaller appli- cation repeated at frequent intervals is preferable to larger application once every four or five years. Where lime is used special care must be taken to maintain an abundant supply of humus in the soil. Lime is best applied broad- cast and harrowed in, but when very small amounts are employed, it is sometimes placed in the drill, or even drilled on top of the ridge after the seed have been planted. 447. Fertilizers. — Other fertilizers for peanuts should - be placed in the drill, though some farmers in Vir- ginia apply a few hundred pounds of land-plaster per acre after the plants have made considerable growth. It seems to be better practice, instead of using plaster, to increase the amount of acid phosphate, since nearly half of the weight of acid phosphate consists of land-plaster. In either form, the plaster converts a part of the potash of the soil into a more available form. The fertilizer most generally needed by peanuts is a 468 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS mixture of acid phosphate and some form of potash, such as kainit or muriate of potash. A good general fertilizer is at least 200 pounds of acid phosphate and 50 pounds ot muriate of potash per acre. If the land is extremely poor, there is some advantage in using a small amount of nitrogenous fertilizer, so as to promote the early growth of the plant before it is able to draw its nitrogen from the air. For this purpose about 40 pounds of nitrate of soda per acre may be placed in the furrow at the time of planting, or, better still, applied on one side of each row of plants at the first cultivation. The later application of nitrate has the ad- vantage of not stimulating the growth of weeds and grass as early in the season as would be the case if it were applied at or before planting. However, for the greater part of the supply of nitrogen re- liance must be placed on that drawn from the air by the tubercles on the roots of the peanut plant. 448. Preparation of the land. — The first step in pre- paring peanut land is to remove any coarse litter, such as stalks of corn or cotton, which might interfere with ger- mination and cultivation. The land should be plowed and thoroughly harrowed. The time of planting depends on the locality, the soil, and the nature of the preceding crop. Generally it is well to plant peanuts after some hoed crop which has been well cultivated, such as cotton. Some farmers find it advantageous to plow the land at least a month before planting. This gives time for weed seeds to germinate. This crop of young weeds should then be destroyed by the use of the disk harrow or other suitable implement. Furrows should be opened at regular intervals and in these the fertilizer drilled, generally by the use of a machine. PEANUT 469 A cultivator or other implement frequently follows the fertilizer distributor, in order to better mix the fertilizer with the soil. When planting on ridges is to be practiced, the land is next ridged, either by means of turn-plows, cultivators with suitable points, or by means of special implements. These ridges, just before planting, should be partially pulled down, and flattened by the use of a weeder or spike-toothed harrow. 449. Method of planting. — On this low, flattened list or ridge the seed are then planted either by means of a planter, — which opens, drops, and covers, all at one time, — or by means of hand-planting in a furrow opened by a scooter and covered by the use of a double foot or other suitable device. On stiff lands a depth of 13 inches suffices early in the season. The depth generally preferred is about 2 inches. When planting is done at a late date or on dry soil, a still greater depth is advisable. On very dry soils, especially when planted late, no ridges are formed, the seed being planted about 2 inches below the surface level. 450. Distance between rows and between plants. — With the Spanish peanuts or other erect varieties, the distance between rows is usually 24 to 30 inches, and from 30 to 36 inches with the running kind. Spanish peanuts on good land may advantageously be planted as close as 4 inches apart in the drill, but cultivation is more econom- ically done if more space is given, usually 8 to 12 inches between hills, with two peas in a place. In experiments at the Arkansas Experiment Station the yield of Spanish peanuts decreased as the space between rows was made 470 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS wider than 2 feet and as the distance between plants was increased above 6 inches. 451. Seed. — To plant an acre of either Spanish or running peanuts rather thickly, requires about two bushels of unhulled nuts, or about half a bushel of hulled peanuts. The seed intended for planting should be harvested before the plants are killed by frost and so stacked and stored as to avoid heating. Varieties having large pods require the shelling of the seed peas, but shelling is not necessary with the Spanish variety. The latter is usually Fic. 202. — A Pranour ‘ Popper.” A device for shelling peanuts. simply broken, each piece being planted with the inclosing shell. In this case, some growers find it advantageous to soak the Spanish peanuts for a few hours before planting, so as to hasten germination. Shelling affords a more nearly perfect stand and more rapid germination, thus giving the crop an opportunity to begin growth before grass and weeds start. Shelling of seed peanuts should usually be performed by hand, since the use of machines for this purpose some- times breaks the thin coat surrounding the nuts. Any injury to this thin layer is apt to interfere with germina- PEANUT 471 tion. In the hand shelling of peanuts the work may be hastened and the fingers spared by the use of a simple device known as the ‘‘ popper.” This is a thin piece of white oak or other suitable material bent into the shape of a pair of tongs (Fig. 202). While the seed peas are being shelled, defective seed should be separated and rejected. 452. Breeding. — No form of plant-breeding has been generally applied to the peanut. However, since the selec- tion of seed from the best plants largely increased the yield of other crops, a similar increase is to be expected by the process of saving seed from the best single plants of peanuts (Fig. 203). 453. Time of planting. — The time of planting varies greatly with the latitude. In Virginia the greater part of the crop is planted in May, and this is the preferred month for planting the running varieties throughout most parts of the cotton-belt. However, these varieties are often planted in April in the southern part of the United States. The Spanish peanut requires less than four months for maturing a crop. Henée, this kind can be planted at any date desired after cotton comes up, and up to the first of Julv. Even later plantings of this va- riety are sometimes made, but at the sacrifice of yield. Spanish peanuts can be planted after any of the small grains are harvested; but unless the season be especially favorable, maximum yields are not to be expected where grain stubble is plowed under in June, because of the tendency of such fields to dry out or otherwise get into poor mechanical condition. 454. Tillage. — After planting and before the plants Fic, 203.— A Fre.p oF Spanisu PEANUTS GROWN FROM SELECTED SEED. A792, PEANUT 473 appear above ground, the peanut field may be tilled with a weeder. As soon as the line of plants can be seen, tillage begins with some form of cultivator equipped with fine teeth or with scrapes. After the young plants have attained some degree of toughness, the weeder is brought into use at frequent intervals. It is best run diagonally across the rows. By this means much of the young grass along the line of the drill is destroyed, thus saving much ‘work with the hoe. One hoeing, or, if necessary, a second one is given, but only when needed. Grass growing among the prostrate branches of the running varieties should be pulled by hand; large weeds in such positions are better cut off, since the pulling of large grass or weeds after the nuts form, disturbs the buried nuts and does more harm than good. The cultivator is used as often as necessary. The first cultivation may be rather deep. Unless level culture is practiced, it is customary for the cultivator to throw some earth around and among the plants, thus making a low ridge or bed of loose soil in which the “ pegs ”” may become imbedded. 455. Rotation. — Peanuts should generally follow a crop kept clean by the use of the hoe. Among such crops are cotton and sweet and Irish potatoes. When the vines are returned to the land and evenly distributed, or when the crop is grazed on the land, the peanut enriches the soil, especially in nitrogen. However, when peanuts are grown for market, both the nuts and vines are usually removed from the land, making a heavy draft on soil fertility, and necessitating a judicious rota- tion. On some fields in the peanut region this crop is 474 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS grown without due attention to rotation. The result is a notable decline in yield, due to the exhaustion of the supplies of humus, potash, phosphoric acid, and lime, and in some cases to the occurrence of disease or insect injury. The best rotation varies with a number of conditions. Where peanuts constitute the main sale crop, they are often rotated with corn. An improvement would be the sowing of either cowpeas or of crimson clover among the corn rows. Peanuts can also be rotated with small grain, the oats or wheat being followed by cowpeas and this crop by peanuts. When cotton is the preceding crop and when the germs of cotton wilt are not present in the soil (para- graph 380), crimson clover seed should usually be sown in the cotton plants in September, and the young clover plants can then be plowed under for fertilizer the next spring, in time for the growth of a crop of peanuts. 456. A recommended rotation. — A suitable rotation for those fields in the southern part of the cotton belt in which the presence of cotton wilt prevents the frequent growing of cotton, is the following : — First year: corn with Iron cowpeas between the rows. Second year: cotton. Third year: peanuts. Fourth year: fall-sown oats, followed by Iron cowpeas. From such a rotation, crimson clover is omitted because it might be the indirect means of increasing the amount of wilt in the next cotton crop. This is because crimson clover is attacked by nematode worms (see paragraph 385) ; but the peanut is exempt from this injury, and hence the VIRGINIA’ NO) 11 Fic. 204.— Pops anp Pras or THREE VARIETIES OF PEANUTS. 475 476 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS latter constitutes a good crop to grow on fields where the organisms of either nematode worms or cotton wilt are present. 457. Varieties. — There are but few varieties of pea- nuts grown in the United States. The most important are described below (Fig. 204). Virginia Runner. — This is a variety having long branches flat on the ground, and bearing pods throughout the entire length. The pods are of light color and usually two or sometimes three in a pod. The pods de not adhere well to the vines in digging. The weight of this and of other large varieties is twenty-two pounds per bushel. Virginta Bunch is an erect variety bearing its fruits only near the base of the plant. The nuts are similar to those of the Virginia Runner. The North Carolina, sometimes called the Wilmington and sometimes the African, has spreading prostrate stems, and the plant is of somewhat smaller size than the Virginia Runner. The pods and peas are also smaller than those of the Virginia Runner, but larger than Spanish peanuts. The percentage of oil is high as compared with other American varieties, but lower than that of peanuts grown in Africa. The weight of the North Carolina variety is twenty-eight pounds per bushel. The Spanish is the earliest variety of American peanuts. The branches grow upright, and the pods are clustered around the base of the plant (Fig. 205). Hence, in sandy soil practically all of the nuts adhere to the vines when the latter are pulled, after being loosened. The pods are short and slender, usually containing two nuts. The hull lies in close contact with the nut, so that moisture is quickly PEANUT Fic. 205.— A Bunch oF SPANISH PEANUTS. 478 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS conveyed to the latter; as a result, Spanish peanuts sprout more quickly, if left in the land after maturing, than do varieties with larger pods and more space between nut and shell. Hence, Spanish peanuts must be dug or used as hog feed soon after ripening, while the large-podded varieties may remain sound enough for hogs to eat through- out the first half of the winter. Spanish peanuts require less than four months from planting to maturity, or at least a month less than most other varieties. Hence they may be planted later. They are sometimes planted after oats are harvested, but under these conditions the yield is reduced. The latest date for planting Spanish peanuts with the expectation of a fair yield is about July 1, in the central part of the cotton- belt. Spanish peanuts can be grown on poorer soil and on soil with less lime in it than can most other varieties. 458. Uses. — The peanut constitutes an important human food. It is eaten roasted, for which use the va- rieties having large pods are preferred. The shelled peas are extensively used in confectionery, and to this use the Spanish and the smaller peas of the other varieties are largely devoted. In Marseilles, France, and in other localities in Europe, large amounts of peanuts from Africa and India are converted into oil and peanut cake. Peanut oil commands a higher market price than cotton-seed oil and is largely used as a substitute for olive oil. There is need for further investigation to determine whether it is practicable for Southern cotton oil mills to manufacture peanut oil from some of the African peanuts, rich in oil, which could doubtless be successfully grown in the South. PEANUT 479 Peanut butter, made from the ground peas or nuts, with or without the addition of oil, is a palatable and nutritious article of human food and is rapidly growing in popularity. 459. The peanut and its by-products as food for live- stock. — Outside of those regions in which the peanut is grown as a sale crop, its principal use is as a food for hogs, the hogs doing the harvesting. To make the season in which peanuts are available as long as possible, there should be a succession of plantings of Spanish peanuts at intervals of a few weeks; this succession of Spanish pea- nuts should be planted in addition to the necessary acreage in the running varieties, the latter being grown largely with a view to use in December. Hogs make satisfactory growth on peanuts alone, but the addition of a small amount of corn makes the gain more rapid and improves the quality of the meat and lard produced. Hogs fed on peanuts make very soft pork and lard that melts at a low temperature. Hence, it is advisable to remove pea- nuts from the ration at least a month before the animals are killed. In growing peanuts as an article of sale, the nuts left in the field and the immature or unmarketable pods may be used in fattening hogs. The Spanish and other varieties of peanuts having an erect habit of growth produce from 1 to 2 tons of excellent hay per acre. This must be mowed before many of the leaves fall or become spotted. The field may then be grazed by cattle and finally hogs turned in to consume the nuts. Peanut meal is quite similar in composition to cotton-seed meal, and suitable for the same uses. In some regions the entire plants — vines with attached nuts —are fed to horses. ‘SLONVAd DNIHOVLS — ‘90% “DIT PEANUT 481 460. Harvesting. — The principal harvesting season is the months of September and October. Peanuts for mar- ket or for seed should be dug before frost. They are ready for harvesting as soon as the pods about the base of the plant show a tendency to shed, or easily become detached from the vine. Harvesting may be done in a variety of ways. The usual method is to remove the moldboard from a turn-plow and run the share under the row on each side at a sufficient depth not to sever the pods from the branches. The side from which the moldboard has been removed is kept next to the row. Sometimes a special blade is attached to the plow in such a way as to run under the line of plants. The plants are then lifted by hand or by means of forks and thrown into small piles on every third row. They are stacked, usually on the same day as dug, and before the plants have thoroughly dried. The stacks are as slender as possible and only about five feet high (Fig. 206). They are made around poles seven feet long, driven securely into the ground. The tops are turned outward and the nuts inward, so as to protect the latter from rain, dew, and sunshine, and from the attacks of birds and other animals. Before making the stack, a few short poles are placed on the ground so as to keep the nuts from resting on the latter; a little space for ventila- tion is left around each stack-pole. The stack is capped with grass, hay, or other material suitable for shedding water. 461. Yields of peanuts. — At the branch Experiment Station at Newport, Arkansas, a yield of 172 bushels per acre was made by planting Spanish peanuts 4 inches apart 21 482 SOUTHERN FIELD CROPS in drills 2 feet apart.1 This is probably the largest yield on record. 110 T. L. Lyon and E. O. Fippin’s The Principles of Soil Management a 175 Hilgard & Osterhout’s Agriculture for Schools on the Pacific Slope 5 : ‘ A : 5 100 J. A. Widtsoe’s Dry Farming . ° . ° ° . 150 ON GARDEN-MAKING L. H. Bailey’s Manual of Gardening : 6 ‘ : 200 L. H. Bailey’s Vegetable-Gardening ° : : . 150 L. H. Bailey’s Horticulturis’s Rule Book ° 5 : 75 L. H. Bailey’s Forcing Bock . . . é ‘ 125 A. French’s How to Grow Vegetables . . . . 175 ON FRUIT-GROWING, Etc. L. H. Bailey’s Nursery Book . . . . . I50 L. H. Bailey’s Fruit-Growing . 5 . . . 150 L. H. Railey’s The Pruning Book . 3 5 A : 150 F. W. Card’s Bush Fruits : . 150 J. T. Bealby’s Fruit Ranching in British Columbia 150 ON THE CARE OF LIVE STOCK D. E. Lyon’s How to Keep Bees for Profit I 50 Nelson S$. Mayo’s The Diseases of Animals 150 W. H. Jordan’s The Feeding of Animals 150 I. P. Roberts’s The Horse a 12 George C. Watson’s Farm Poultry I 25 C. 5. Valentine’s How to Keep Hens for Profit 150 O. Kellner’s The Scientific Feeding of Animals (trans. ) 190 M. H. Reynolds’s Veterinary Studies for Agricultural Stu- dents . . . . . . . . . . 175 BOOKS ON AGRICULTURE — Continued ON DAIRY WORK Henry H. Wing’s Milk and its Products é 5 . $150 C. M, Aikman’s Milk. : , : : ‘ . 125 Harry Snyder’s Dairy Chemistry . ; 100 W. D. Frost’s rere Guide in* Elementary Bacteri- ology . 2 ‘ 7 1 60 I. P. Sheldon’s : The Farm and the Dairy 3 100 Chr. Barthel’s Methods Used in the Examination of Milk and Dairy Products. : 190 ON PLANT DISEASES, Etc. George Massee’s Diseases of Cultivated Plants and Trees 225 G, Lipman’s Bacteria in Relation to Country Life. 150 E. C. Lodeman’s The Spraying of Plants : z ‘i 125 H. M. Ward’s Disease in Plants (English) . ‘i : 1 60 A. S. Packard’s A Text-book on Entomology . : : 450 ON PRODUCTION OF NEW PLANTS L. 11. Bailey’s Plant- Breeding : A : ‘ 125 L. H. Bailey’s The Survival of the Unlike : ‘ 200 L. H. Bailey’s The Evolution of Our Native Fruits , 200 W. S. Harwood’s New Creations in Plant Life 3 : 175 ON ECONOMICS AND ORGANIZATION J. B. Green’s Law for the American Farmer . 3 150 J. McLennan’s Manual of Practical Farming . 5 : 150 L. H. Bailey’s The State and the Farmer 5 : ‘ I 25 Henry C. Taylor’s Agricultural Economics. ; : 125 I. P. Roberts’s The Farmer’s Business Handbook . : 125 George T. Fairchild’s Rural Wealth and Welfare . : I 25 S. E. Sparling’s Business Organization . : 125 In the Citizen’s Library. Includes a chapter on Farm- ing Kate V. St. Maur’s A Self-supporting Home . ; : 175 Kate V. St. Maur’s The Earth’s Bounty . ‘ 175 G, F. Warren and K. C. Livermore’s Exercises in "Farm Management 3 : . . ‘ : 80 H. N. Ogden’s Rural Hygiene ; : : ; 150 ON EVERYTHING AGRICULTURAL L. H. Bailey’s Cyclopedia of American Agriculture: Vol. I. Farms, Climates, and Soils. Vol. II. Farm Crops. ° Vol. III. Farm Animals. Vol. lV. The Farm and the Community. Complete in four royal 8vo volumes, with over 2000 illustrations. Price of sets: cloth, $20 half morocco, $32 for further information as to any of the above, address the publishers. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York Cyclopedia of American Agriculture Epirep sy L. H. BAILEY Director of the College of Agriculture and Professor of Rural Economy, Cornell University. With 100 full-page plates and more than 2000 illus: trations in the text; four volumes; the set, $20.00 half morocco, $32.00 carriage extra VOLUME I— Farms VoLomeE III — Animals VoLuME II—Crops VoLumE IV—The Farm and the Community “Indispensable to public and reference libraries . . . readily compre- hensible to any person of average education.” — 7he ation. “The completest existing thesaurus of up-to-date facts and opinions on modern agricultural methods, It is safe to say that many years must pass before it can be surpassed in comprehensiveness, accuracy, prac- tical value, and mechanical excellence. It ought to be in every library in the country.” — Recora-Herald, Chicago. Cyclopedia of American Horticulture Epireo sy L. H. BAILEY With over 2800 original engravings; four volumes; the set, $20.00 half morocco, $32.00 carriage extra “This really monumental performance will take rank as a standard in its class. Illustrations and text are admirable. .. . Our own convic- tion is that while the future may bring forth amplified editions of the work, it will probably never be superseded. Recognizing its impor. tance, the publishers have given it faultless form, The typography leaves nothing to be desired, the paper is calculated to stand wear and tear, and the work is at once handsomely and attractively bound.” — Vez York Daily Tribune. PUBLISHED BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 64-66 Fifth Avenue, New York = Ras iH PRN RC Se ae Bxersetretias ae % eta se eiereewicey se