IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 // 
 
 4 
 
 A^ 
 
 
 ^. 
 
 1.0 
 
 i.l 
 
 1.25 
 
 150 "^^ I^H 
 
 Li 
 
 2.0 
 
 ^ IIIIIM 
 
 '-^y 
 
 Vl 
 
 ^>. 
 
 'V ') 
 
 
 7 
 
 a 
 
 fliotographic 
 
 Sdences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquas at bibliographiquaa 
 
 Tha Instituta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat 
 original copy availabia for filming. Faaturaa of thia 
 copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua. 
 which may altar any of tha imagaa in tha 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 r~7] Coloured covers/ 
 IVI Couverture de couleur 
 
 |~n Covers damaged/ 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommagie 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pellicula 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 La titra da couverture manque 
 
 I — I Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartea giographiquaa •n couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encra de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I — I Coloured plataa and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planchea et/ou illustrations an couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli* avec d'autras documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serrie peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distorsion le long de la marge intirieura 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissant dana la texte, 
 mais^ lorsque cela itait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas M filmAas. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplimentairas; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm* la mailleur exemplaire 
 qu'il tui a iti possibiti da se procurer. Las details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-itre uniques du 
 point da vue bibliographiqua, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m^thoda normale de filmage 
 sont indiqute ci-dessous. 
 
 r~| Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pagea de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pelliculies 
 
 r~y| Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 1)/ ' Pages dicoiories. tachatias ou piquies 
 
 Pages ditachies 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Qualiti inigale de {'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary matarii 
 Comprend du materiel suppl^mantaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 r~n Pages detached/ 
 
 r~l Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 r~~| Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 rn Only edition available/ 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Lea pages totalement ou partieilement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., cnt iti fiimies i nouveau de facon i 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film* au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 y 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
Th« copy filmad h«r« has b««n rtproducsd thanks 
 to tha ganarosity of: 
 
 Library of ParlismMrt and tha 
 National Library of Canada. 
 
 Tha imagaa appoaring hara ara tha baat quality 
 possibia consldaring tha condition and lagibiiity 
 of tha original copy and in Icaaping with tha 
 Aiming contract spaeifieationa. 
 
 Original copiaa in printad papar covars ara filmad 
 baginning with tha front covar and anding on 
 tha last paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa- 
 sion. or tha bacic covar whan appropriata. All 
 othar original copiaa ara filmad baginning on tha 
 first paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa* 
 sion. and ending on tha last paga with a printad 
 or illustrstad impraaaion. 
 
 L'axampiaira film* fut raproduit grica k la 
 g4n4roait* da: 
 
 La BibliothAqiM du Pariamant at la 
 Biblioth^a nationals du Canada. 
 
 Laa imagaa suivantaa ont 4ti raproduitas avac la 
 plus grand soin, compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattati da raxam|:laira fllm4, at an 
 conformity avac laa conditions du contrst da 
 flimaga. 
 
 Laa aKamplalraa originaux dont la eouvartura sn 
 papiar aat imprim4a sont film4a an commandant 
 par la pramiar plat at an tarminant soit par la 
 dmnMn paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 dimpraaalon ou dliluatration. soit par la lacond 
 plat, salon la eaa. Tous laa autras sxampiairas 
 originaux sont filmis sn commandant par la 
 pramlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 dimpraaalon ou dliluatration at an tarminant par 
 la damlAra paga qui comporta una taila 
 amprainta. 
 
 Tha laat racordad frama on aach microfleha 
 shall contain tha symbol ^^^tmaanlng "CON- 
 TINUED"), or tha symbol y (maaning "END"), 
 whichavar appllaa. 
 
 Un daa symbolaa suhfants apparattra sur la 
 damMra imaga da chaqua mieroficha. salon la 
 caa: la symbols — » signifia "A SUIVRE". la 
 symbols ▼ signifia "FIN". 
 
 Mapa, piataa, charts, stc.. may ba filmad at 
 diffarant raduction ratioa. Thoaa too iarga to ba 
 antiraly includad in ona axpoaura ara filmad 
 baginning in tha uppar laft hand comar. laft to 
 right and top to bottom, aa many framaa aa 
 raquirad. Tha following diagrama illuatrata tha 
 mathod: 
 
 Laa cartaa. planchas. tablaaux. ate. pauvant Atra 
 film*B i dss taux da riduetion diff^rants. 
 Lorsqua la documant aat trop grand pour itro 
 raproduit an un saul cllcii4. il aat film4 A partir 
 da i'angia sup4riour gaucha, da gaucha A droita, 
 at da haut 1% baa. tn pranant la nombra 
 dimagaa n4caasaira. Laa diagrammas suivants 
 illuatrant la mAthoda. 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
' t 
 
 '-4/ 
 
 ■i" ••( 
 
 A PASTORAL ADDRESS, 
 
 
 BY 
 
 JOHN STANNAGE, 
 
 s> 
 
 ^edtof of Kenqptrille 
 
 TO 
 
 ,^. 
 
 HIS PARISHIONERS. 
 
 Printed at the Church P. & P. Company, Toronto, Ont. 
 
 t' 
 
 -^1 
 
 1873- 
 
 #1 
 
 ' 1: 
 
 •tK- ■■ 
 
 hi- 
 
 _;-y*. 
 
T'M 
 
 »%^ 
 
 ^< - -li ''X ■ f 
 
 'i^.'v>''A,\':,'i 
 
 
 ?vv1,'5 
 
 ' V 
 
 » fi 
 
 h 
 
 
A PASTORAL ADDRESS. 
 
 » » 
 
 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND IN 
 
 KEMPTVILLE, ONTARIO. 
 
 My Dear Parishioners, — 
 
 It has come to my knowledge that many of you are not pleased 
 with me because I have frequent week-day Services in church (as the 
 Prayer-book directs) and because I have a cross on one of my churches, 
 and because I never can speak respectfully of sects, but think it my 
 duty to denounce them, and to warn you against all Sectarianism, 
 (even as the Bible does) and as I have promised to drive away all 
 erroneous doctrines from my parish, to the best of my ability. ** Am 
 I become your enemy because I tell you the truth ?" Gal. iv. 16. 
 
 Painful as it is to feel that you are offended, I am happy to 
 inform you that I have nothing to retract of what I have said or 
 done, and only fear my not having been explicit enough, and that my 
 natural infirmities may possibly have, to some extent, marred tho 
 cause which I wished to promote. 
 
 With a view to put the truth more fully before you, and to reach 
 every parishioner more easily than I can do from the pulpit, I have 
 written the following short summary of the doctrines of the Bible and 
 the Church which I feel bound to preach and to teach among you, 
 and without which I could not feel comfortable in my conscience. 
 Permit me, then, to beg of you to pay great attention to the words of 
 Holy Scripture which I have quoted, and to put them above every 
 human, or social consideration. If you do so you will see that the 
 Bible speaks against sects and divisions a vast deal more plainly and 
 reprovingly than I ever did. And at the same time I would remind 
 you that whenever I speak, or warn you, against sects, it is not 
 against the good and well-disposed people among the sects that I 
 speak. I thought I had repeatedly expressed myself very fully on 
 this subject. St. Jude, while reproving very severely *• those that 
 separate themselves," says that ** of some we must make a difference." 
 Jude xxii. I have always said that there are Christians connected, 
 irith sects that are honest and sincere, and doing all they can to 
 
please God according to the light that is in them, and even better 
 than some who call themselves Churahpeoijle. It is not against such 
 that I speak, as I have often told you. These .only want more hglit, 
 and more information, to bring them to their own place. But it is 
 against the principle of sects that I can never speak too strongly. 
 That spirit, that evil genius, which has come upon the Christian 
 world, and especially among Protestants, which cuts, and splits, and 
 wounds the Body of Christ, causing it to bleed from all its pores, is 
 the principle against which the whole Bible makes war, and which no 
 honest and enhghtened Christian can approve. Nay, it is pleasing 
 to know that even among other denominations at the present day 
 there is a growing spirit of dissatisfaction with this very principle. 
 For it is no less than Popery itself in another form. It encourages 
 every man to take his own erring conscience instead of the written 
 Word and the united voice of the Primitive Church for his guide. 
 Thus men explain the Bible as they please, and 150 sects have sprung 
 up in the world, and all think themselves right. So every man may 
 have a creed of his own and thus become his own Pope. Such a 
 doctrine is not to be found in the Bible, and I verily beUeve it is now 
 used by the Great Enemy 'to annihilate Christianity if it were possible. 
 But I am quite aware that for want of information, and training, and 
 owing to many other circumstances, a very large allowance must be 
 made for the case of many members of other denominations, and they 
 should Be made to understand that when we denounce sects it is 
 rather in love for their souls than with a view to wound their feehngs. 
 
 IS ANY ONE TO BE SAVED OUT OF THE CHURCH ? 
 
 I understand that some of you are apt to draw the conclusion 
 that when I denounce sectarianism and speak of the true Church I 
 thereby look upon all outside the Church as eternally lost. I beg 
 most distinctly to state that such an idea never crossed my mind. I 
 believe God, for Christ's sake, will save millions of those who do not 
 belong to the true visible Church, because they could not belong to it. 
 Not because they are outsiders, but because they want the information 
 and training which they ought to have. The real nature of the sin of 
 schism is in wilful, stubborn, obstinate, and proud opposition to God's 
 constituted institutions after we have been trained and well instructed 
 ia them ; and God forbid that I should consider all those whose lot 
 
 1 
 
 :?' 
 
 t 
 
 1 
 
 ^ 
 
•'i- 
 
 
 t 
 
 1 
 
 i' 
 
 8 
 
 is, from their yonth, cast among; sects, as guilty of this great sin until 
 they are better informed. To the visible Church alone, certainly, the 
 promises are made, but God has nowhere said that He will punish the 
 ignorant as well as the guilty. On the contrary, the Lord says that 
 " they who knew not the will of the Father shall be beaten with few 
 stripes." And many are the instances in Holy Scripture of those who 
 were real servants of God long before they were acquainted with the 
 terms of the covenant in the Church of God's own appointment. 
 CorneUus was one of these, and yet, though his "prayers and his 
 alms came up for a memorial before God," he was required to be 
 baptized, and to unite himself to the visible Church as soon as he was 
 instructed more fully. Acts x. 
 
 PASSAGES OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, PEOVING THE VISIBLE UNITY 
 
 OP THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, AND CONDEMNING DIVISIONS, 
 
 OR SECTS, OR SCHISMS OF ALL SORTS. 
 
 St. John's, xvii. 21. — " That they all may be one, as Thou, 
 Father, art in me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in us that 
 the world may beUeve that Thou hast sent me." 
 
 It is a well known fact that the greatest obstacle to the conver- 
 sion of the heathens is the present state of open division among 
 Christians. 'Learn to agree among yourselves,' say heathen philoso- 
 phers, 'before coming to convert us.' 
 
 Eom. xfvi. 17. — " Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which 
 cause divisions and offences contrary •? the doctrine that ye havo 
 learned, and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord 
 Jesus Christ but their own belly, (or self-interest) and by good words 
 and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple." The simple are 
 eOiaily g&medhy good words and fair speeches. ^ 
 
 Divisions were ever offences to the Christian Church because they 
 are wounds in " the Body of Christ which is the Church," and there- 
 fore to speak softly of sects is to speak softly of the wounds in 
 Christ's Body. And to follow sects, and to encourage divisions in 
 any way is to go directly against Holy Scripture, which commands us 
 to ** avoid them." 
 
 Col. i. 18.— " He is the Head of the body the Church." 
 
 I. Cor. xii. 18. — *' For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one 
 hody:* 
 
 ■ 1 '■: 
 
L Oor. xii. 26.— « That there shonld be no sohisxn in the body." 
 
 I. Oor. xii. 27.—" Now ye are the body of Christ." 
 
 St. Paul, in this chapter, proves the visible luiity of the Church 
 by the visible unity of all the members of the human body. Can 
 sects do this ? 
 
 1. Oor. xi. 19. — For there must be also heresies (or sects) among 
 you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you." 
 We pray in the Litany against " heresies and schisms," because both 
 these errors were ever classed together. 
 
 Philip iii. 2. — "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware 
 of the Concision." 
 
 The Apostle was here speaking of those who were causing divis- 
 ions in those times. Dogs tear and scatter tho flock. What would 
 you say if he were among us now and using tho same language as 
 apphed to the makers of sects ? The concision is a rent, a spUt, a 
 cut, made in the body. Can a clergyman be wrong when he imitates 
 the Apostle warning his people against " the concision," or the great 
 sin of schism ? This sin has now become so popular that it is almost 
 a virtue. Some actually say the more sects the better ! Is it worse 
 to speak against sects than to pray against schism 9 And no 
 dissenter can come to church when the Litany is read without hearing 
 ua pray against schisms. 
 
 Then see what St. Jude says of those '* who separate themselves," 
 
 (v. 19) " who speak evil of dignities," who " speak evil of those things 
 
 which they know not," who are "carried about of winds," who are 
 
 "murmurers, complainers," "having men's persons in admiration," 
 and " perish in the gainsaying of Core 1" 
 
 Doubtless all this applies to the makers of sects more than to 
 those whose lot is innocently cast in among them. 
 
 Hear again what St. Paul says : 1 Cor. i. 10. "Now I beseech 
 you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak 
 the same thing, and that there be no divisions among yo, but that ye 
 be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judg- 
 ment." And V. 18. ♦• Is Christ divided ?" And ohapt. iii. 4. " For 
 ye are yet carnal. For whereas there is among you envying, and 
 strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal and walk as men ?" II. Cor. 
 xiii. 11. " Be of one mind, live ia peace, and the God of peace shall 
 be with yon." 
 
 i 
 
 
» I 
 
 f 
 
 ' • 
 
 ^ 
 
 Now, then, it must be perfectly clear that so much ooold not be 
 said abont unity and the bin of division if there were no one Ohuroh 
 to be adhered to, or to be separated from. A perfectly spiritual body 
 upon earth is nonsense. And if all sects form the Church, as most 
 Protestants would now have it, there could be no visible unity, or no 
 such a thing as schism, and the Bible would also speak nonsens*. 
 Wo must, therefore, point out the Church of the Scriptures to under- 
 stand what sects are, and what schism is. 
 
 WHAT IS A SECT ? 
 A sect is a piece cut off from the main body. It is a branch sep- 
 arated from the main trunk of a tree. The Church of England was 
 never so cut off, and so it is not a sect. If it were a sect, then the 
 Church of Rome, or the Greek Church, would be the only true Church, 
 and we should be all bound to return to it. And to say that all sects 
 constitute the Christian Church is as much as to say that the word 
 sect should be erased from all dictionaries, for there would be no such 
 a thing as a sect, nor could there be any. 
 
 WHAT DIFFERENCE IS THERE BETWEEN A HIGH-CHURCHMAN AND 
 
 A LOW-CHURCHMAN ? 
 
 A High- Churchman believes in the Divine authority of the 
 Cliurch handed down to us from the Apostles' time, and called in the 
 creed " Catholic and Apostolic ;" a Low-Churchman looks upon the 
 Church as only the best among the sects, but only a sect after all, 
 and so he may leave it, or hold to it as he pleases, and does not think 
 it a sin to separate from it. A High-Churchman would rather beheve 
 and obey the unanimous consent of all Clu:i8tians during the jfirst ages 
 of the Christian era, than to follow his own erring and fallible judg- 
 ment ; a Low- Churchman would rather follow his own opinion, or his 
 own conscience, or the opinion of some clever and popular leader of 
 a party, than the decrees of the Primitive Councils, or the united 
 voice of the Church of God as expressed in the -Book of Common 
 Prayer. A High-Churchman has such a humble opinion of himself, 
 or of his fallible conscience, that he humbly bows to his ** spiritual 
 pastors and masters ;" A Low-Churchman thinks more of his own 
 feelings than of the obedience due to authority. A High- Churchman 
 thinks more of a consecrated place of worship than of a common 
 
9r 
 
 house because of God'fl promise to it ; p, Low-Ohuroliman does not 
 gee much differonco botween the two. A Hif^h-Churchman thinks it 
 his duty and privilego to follow the rubrics of the Prayer-book even 
 more than tho laws of the land, and to bo in the House of God for 
 prayer as often as possible on week-days, because the Lord has 
 promised to bless were it but two or three thus assembled in His 
 name ; a Low-Churchman calls all this Popery. A High-Churchman 
 believes that tho Lord's Supper is a real supper for the soul hunger- 
 ing and thirsting after tho righteousness of Christ, and therefore a 
 real though spiritual Presence of the Lord whom he worships there 
 more than anywhere else ; a Low-Churchman looks upon the Lord's 
 Supper as a mere form, or badge ©f union, or a ceremony which no 
 one should approach except when he is perfect. A High- Churchman 
 is not afraid to suffer reproach for being so, or to profess openly his 
 firm behef in God's own institutions in preference to those of men ; 
 a Low-Churchman thinks so little of those sacred things that he is 
 afraid to be called a Papist on their account, and would rather please 
 man. A High-Churchman considers the Episcopal, or " Old Catho- 
 lic " Church, (as it should be called) as quite distinct from the Papal- 
 Church, and as given to the world to be the Depository of the Truth, 
 or " the Pillar and ground of tho Truth," as St. Paul calls it, I. Tim. 
 iii. 16., and therefore to be preserved in all its integrity, and purified 
 from time to time, if necessary, through its own Synods, but never by 
 divisions which do more harm than good ; a Low-Churchman does 
 not care much for Divine Institutions of this kind, or he may be too 
 ill-informed to understand them, and so he does not mourn very 
 much over the heresies and schisms which now deform and threaten 
 to annihilate Christianity. A High-Churchman does not call that 
 Popery which is only good to promote reverence and devotion, or a 
 mere ornament ; but a Low-Churchman cannot even bear the sign of 
 the Cross under which he was baptized, and called in the Prayer-book 
 the " banner " of Christ ; unlike every good soldier he is ashamed of 
 his own colours, and would rather give them to the enemy ! 
 
 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A HIGH-CHUECHMAN AND A 
 
 PAPIST ? 
 
 Dissenters and Low-Churchmen take great pleasure in repre- 
 senting High-Churchism as Popery. This is generally done through 
 
 i 
 
 % 
 
 i 
 
 f 
 
 i 
 
f 
 
 
 great ignorance of both parties. A Papist, that is — an Ultramontane, 
 beheves in the Popo alono as the only Head of the Church, as the In- 
 falibio ruler of the wholo Church in the world, as the •♦ Lord God 
 upou Earth ;" but a lligh-Churchman believes that God gave the 
 government of the Church to the twelve Apostles and their successori, 
 and the Bishops took tlie place of the twelve Apostles when the latter 
 died. The Lord promised to bo with them to the end of the world, 
 and He could not bo with them except through their sucoessors. 
 From the earhest hiatory of the Church, oven Mosheim, a Presbyterian, 
 admits, tJiat Bishops were looked upon as successors of the Apostles. 
 Hence they are also called Apostles, and " Angels," as those oyer the 
 Seven Churches in the Book of Kevelation. 
 
 A Papist believes any decree from the Pope, or any new dogma 
 which the Pope alone will promulge, as, for instance, the late dogma 
 of the "Immaculate Conception," and that on the " InfaUbihty ;" 
 but a High-Churchman only believes in the ♦* doctrine and discipline 
 of the undisputed general councils," that is, the doctrines and Church- 
 government which were adopted and acted upon by all the Bishops 
 in the world unanimously, ever since the Apostle's time, and before 
 any divisions crept in. A Papist behoves in the Bible only as ex- 
 plained by the Pope of Eome ; but a High-Churchman beheves in the 
 Bible only as explained by the Primitive General Councils, and not 
 by every man's private judjifmont. ** No prophecy is of private inter- 
 pretation." (II. Peter i. 20). 
 
 And St. Peter says that some ** wrest the Scriptures to their own 
 destruction." (II. Peter, iii. IG). 
 
 The Papist beheves in the real material presence of Christ in 
 the Lord's Supper ; but the High- Churchman believes only in the 
 real Spiritual or Heavenly Presence. The Papist beheves in enricular 
 confession as a Sacrament ; but the High- Churchman beheves in it 
 only as an occasional necessity under great trouble of conscience. 
 The Papist believes in the worship of the Virgin and Saints ; but the 
 High- Churchman only remembers their virtues and prays to be made 
 like them. The Papist pays great reverence to images and rehos ; 
 but the High- Churchman only uses them as we use pictures in our 
 houses, to remember our friends, &c., but never to worship them. 
 God Himself ordered the representation of things in Heaven and 
 Earth in the Temple. The Papist believes that Saints have more 
 
geod works than they need for themselves, and that the Pope has a 
 store of these called "Works of Supererogation," which he sells for 
 money ; but the High- Churchman believes only in the merits and 
 intercession of the Lord Christ, as the *' Only Name given under 
 Heaven whereby we may be saved." More might be adduced to 
 ehew the difference between a High- Churchman and a Papist, but 
 surely enough has been advanced to prove that I have no sympathy 
 with real Popery. I am sure I can depend upon the truly honest 
 and humble followers of " Christ and the Church " among you, and 
 I can only pray for those who would rather follow their own way 
 until it shall please God to open their eyes. Eevelation and learning 
 are of no use to such persons. We have unhappily permitted our 
 people to lose sight of the true Catholic principles, and to bring them 
 back to these, I can easily see, will require a very great effort. 
 Cathohc unity, not Romanism, must be restored. What we must 
 shew first of all is that we have charity for all, but we cannot love 
 what separates good people ; and this cannot be done without a long 
 course of patient and plain teaching. We cannot love Christ without 
 loving his own institutions ; and we cannot love our neighbours 
 without trying to make them partakers of the privileges which we 
 have in Christ's Own Church; and Churchmen cannot contend for 
 their own Church, as Dissenters do for theirs, unless they are better 
 taught than they have been these many years. 
 
 h 
 
 WHAT, THEN, IS THE CHUBCH ? 
 
 The Lord Himself tells us that " if any man will not hear (or 
 obey) the Church he is no better than a heathen man and a pubUoan." 
 Matth. xviii. 17. There must therefore be one Church which we 
 must obey or which we may disobey. It is impossible to hear, or to 
 obey, a great many churches at the same time. " No man can serve 
 two masters." St. Paul commands us to •* obey them that have the 
 rule over us, and to submit ourselves for they watch for our souls as 
 they that must give account ;" Heb. xiii. 17. but if every man can 
 choose a Church at pleasure, or invent a new creed as often as he 
 pleases, what is the use of St. Paul's advice ? Or what obedience is 
 there in disobedience ? It is plain that to obey the Bible you must 
 obey the Church, or to reject the authority of God's Church is to reject 
 God's Word. And since we Uve in days when__men will, as it was 
 
' '» 
 
 foretold, "heap to themflelyes tesfohers/' 11 Tim. iv. 8, it becomes the 
 duty of the clergy to teach, and it is the duty of the people to learn, 
 what the true Church is. 
 
 Now, we all know that the Lord Christ, while upon earth, did foun^ 
 a Church which the holy Apostles completed as he had directed. He 
 promised that the "gates of hell should not prevail against it." Matth. 
 xvl. 18. This Church He called His Kingdom, orthe Kingdom of Heaven, 
 and He compares it to a field> or to a net, inclosing both good and 
 
 bad. Matth. iv. 80. He told His Apostles that as His Father had 
 given Him a Kingdom, even so. He gave them a Kingdom. Matth. 
 xiii. 47. " And I appoint unto you a Kingdom, as My Father hath 
 appointed unto Me a Kingdom." Luke xxii. 29. Hence it is as evi- 
 dent as anything can be, that as God commands us to " obey every 
 ordinance of man for the Lord's sake," He also commands us to 
 
 obey the laws of His Church. The State and the Church 
 are the two great instruments which He has ordained for our guid- 
 ance, the oue for the body and the other for the soul; and we no- 
 where find that He ordained, or sanctioned, any subdivisions except 
 when approved by those in authority in the Church. On the con- 
 trary He says that every Kingdom divided against itself is brought to 
 desolation. Matth. xii. 25. 
 
 We know the time and date when every sect began to exist, but 
 the beginning of our Church dates from the planting of Christianity 
 in Jerusalem from which it was brought over to England in the 
 earhest age of ecclesiastical history. Thus the difference between the 
 Church of God and a sect is this : — The Church was organized by 
 Christ Himself and therefore is of Divine origin and authority; a 
 sect ia organized by man and has only human authority. The clergy 
 of the Church are sent by Christ Himself ; the ministers of sects send 
 themselves, or are sent by men having no authority from God. The 
 lawful clergy may abuse their commission, even as a magistrate can, 
 but their commission is from God for all that. " The true Shepherds 
 come in by the door into the Sheepfold," and their punishment shall 
 be great indeed if they neglect their duty. Dissenting ministers 
 ridicule all this, but they would not despise these arguments if they 
 could use them for their own side of the quesiiou. . > 
 
10 
 
 ,' : rrs^.r ,1 K , THE SPIEITUAL OHTROH. + , >> ;> 
 
 I know that you will be told that there is no other true Church 
 than the Spiritual Church, which consists of aU faithful behevers in 
 all denominations. In that case there could be no visible Church 
 whatever, and all the Scriptures referring to it would be perfectly 
 unintelligible. No one could obey a Church which could not be seen, 
 or known except by God Himself. We must "hear " and ** obey " 
 the Church, but how hear and obey a discordant, scattered multitude ? 
 Is it not perfect nonsense ? High-Churchmen beheve that there are 
 truly honest and sincere people in all denominations, and even among 
 heathens, but that is only until they are better taught. But there 
 ie not one word of promise, no covenanted mercies, except to the 
 baptized, and to them that *' obey and submit themselves.'' It thus 
 appears that the Lord naturally wants His people to renounce their 
 selfishness and private judgment, and to be united in love, even the 
 same love as that which led Him to die for them, under His own 
 ministers, His own Sacraments, and His own ordinances, as one body^ 
 one visible body, a body which can be seen and heard, and handled, 
 commissioned by Himself to evangehze the world and to " gather all 
 nations into one fold under one Shepherd," himself the Head over all. 
 But you can easily see that this great work can never be accomplished 
 under the system of division without end, and this is what makes me 
 so sore, and so great an opponent of the principle of Sectarianism. 
 The more I love my fellow Christians, the more I hate the spirit that 
 divides them. I repeat it ; God alone knows those that are His. 
 His Church can only be known by outward unity under His lawful 
 ministers and ordinances. ♦• Great swelling words," eloquent and 
 popular speeches, or even great success, do not constitute sterling 
 piety or a vaUd Priesthood. They who shew the finest appearance of 
 Religion often deceive us most. "To obey," therefore, " is bstter 
 than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams." I. Sam. xv. 22. 
 
 Sectarians will teU you that the Lord did not reprove the man 
 that was casting out devils in his name though he did not follow Him, 
 and therefore they may do the same ; but the Christian Church 
 was not yet organized, and they all attended the Temple Service. 
 The man could not be, therefore, making a sect. And the fact 
 that he was working miracles proves nothing in favour of sects, for 
 the Lord says that on the last day some will be. rejected though 
 they " oast out devils in His name." Matth. vii. 22, 23. 
 
 
 'i^ 
 
 41 • 
 
 « 
 
11 
 
 y 
 
 4 ■* 
 
 The shocking state of division into which the Christian world 
 has fallen, produced by the abuse of authority in Rome, and the abuse 
 of hberty among Protestants, and the difficulty of access to such 
 books as should be studied, and the opinion of the leaders of sects 
 being followed rather than the plain words of Holy Writ above 
 quoted, and prejudice instead of the honest investigation of the truth 
 having taken hold of men's minds, it is not easy to inform them, or 
 to convince them against their will. God alone will do that one day, 
 though it may not be before the end of all sublunary things as the 
 natural consequence of all our divisions. .. : r-^v. \ , r 
 
 There will, however, always be a small number upon earth who 
 will hold to the truth, and these, hke Abraham and Lot of old, will 
 *' enquire for the old paths and walk therein," though the whole 
 world should persecute them unto death. Jeremiu,h vi. 16. It may 
 be said that there are various parties and shades of opinion in the 
 Church of England itself, and it must be confessed that such is the 
 case, and that such has always been the case in any Church, and 
 will ever be the case, so long as we are in this imperfect world. But 
 it must also be evident that one of the parties must be the best and 
 therefore the nearest to the truth. One of thsse parties must of 
 necessity represent the true Church, and must do all in its power to 
 inform the others as a labour of love until we a}\ come to "the per- 
 fect stature of the full grown man in Christ Jesus." They may, 
 indeed, find their task a troublesome one, but then* duty is the same ; 
 and both clergy and laity are equally bound to contend manfully, 
 though in love, for "the faith once deUvered to the saints;" and a 
 part of that faith is this : — " 1 believe in one Catholic and ApostoUc 
 Church." 
 
 ^ 
 
 NATURE OF THE CHURCH. 
 I would not have space to go very deeply into the nature and 
 history of the " One Catholic and Apostolic Church." I can only 
 give an outline of what the Church of England beUeves on this 
 subject, and refer you to a few books which you can easily procure ; 
 and I do this as as a duty which I owe to you, and that while 
 sectarians are ever active in defending their own tenets, you may be 
 able to do the same if you are honest and true, and not cowards, 
 towards your own Church. , ,., 
 
12 
 
 THE APOSTOLIC SUOOESBION. 
 
 That the Church of England believes in the Apostolic Sucoegsion 
 of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, you can easily see by looking into 
 the preface to the Ordination of Deacons in your Prayer-book. There 
 it is plainly said that " from the Apostles' time these three orders of 
 ministers have existed in the Christian Church." We also constantly 
 pray for these in the Litany. 
 
 The Church further proves the reality of her faith by her practice 
 in rejecting all ordinations but the genuine Episcopal, and by not 
 re-ordaining Eomanists who join us because they already have the 
 true ordination. Thus we beheve in the CathoKc and not in the 
 Roman daotrines. We believe in all that was believed by the Apostles 
 and by the whole Church, before it was defaced by superstitiion. 
 Whatever was Scriptural, or Catholic, among Romanists, we retained, 
 for we always had it, but rejected whatever was contrary to 
 the doctrine of the Apostles and of the Primitive Church. 
 The Church of England did not begin to exist at the Reformation. 
 She was merely re-formed. And the Apostolic Ministry, and the 
 CathoUc Creeds, with the Holy Sacraments, constitute the foundations 
 of the Christian Church, (Jesus Christ Himself being the chief 
 corner-stone) as it was always received and understood by all Chris- 
 tians until they were divided into sects of all kinds. Hence our 
 praying in the Litany against " heresies and schisms." Hence our 
 praying that all Christians may " hold the faith in the unity of 
 the Spirit, and in the bond of peace." Hence the Article which 
 says that " it is not lawwful for any man to take upon him the office 
 of public preaching, or ministering the Sacraments in the congregation, 
 before he be lawfully called and sent to execute the Same." xxiii. 
 Article. Thus we believe that the Church is " built upon the 
 Apostles and Prophets, Jesus Chii,;i Himself being the chief corner- 
 stone." I. Tim. iii. 15. The same Apostle calls it " +I10 pillar and 
 ground of the truth." History will tell you tliat the British Church 
 was planted in England five hundred years before the Pope of Rome 
 had anything to do with it. All true Catholic Churches in all parts 
 of the world acknowledge her as a true branch of the whole. There 
 is also one fact worth noticing. It is this : — All sects, and even many 
 Romanists, recognize the validity of our Orders, wliile we never 
 recognize the validity of Dissenting orders. Hence the hundreds of 
 conversions to us from the ranks of ministers of other denominations 
 within a short time, especially in the United States. ^ 
 
 - 
 
 II 
 
18 
 
 1 
 
 OKB WORD ABOUT THE OBOBft , 
 
 Hhe sign of the Gross ir the banner of Ohristianity. We are idl 
 baptized and enlisted to fight under it. The ear^y Ohristiaxi«i 
 long before Popery, adopted it as their flag and colour to testify to 
 the heathens that they were not ashamed to confess Ohrist orucifiedC 
 It is yet in the British Orown, and on the British flag. It is to b(» 
 seen on all, or nearly all, our churches elsewhere. Go to Ottawa, to 
 Prescott, to Brockville, to Kingston, or to any other city, and you 
 see the plain cross upon the churches. Even dissenting chapels have 
 it. Free Masons have it on some of their regalia. Why then should 
 I be called a Papist because I have placed a beautiful ornament not 
 quite a cross on St. Paul's Church, Marlborough ? Is it because 
 Bomanists have it ? But both Bomanists and Dissenters have many 
 good things which they have from us and this is one of them. Can 
 it be possible that any of you should be so ignorant as not to know 
 this ? Both Boman and Protestant dissenters have all their best 
 books and best doctrines from the Old Catholic Church which existed 
 long before either of them, and if you have not learning enough to 
 know this, my dear people, you ought not to despise those who know 
 better than you, and who are trying to teach you to be thankful for 
 your privileges. Do you not know that even the Canon of Scripture, 
 that is — what is the genuine Word of God — was declared and estab- 
 lished by the Church, in Council, long before the Bishop of Bome 
 claimed his present monstrous authority ? How would you know that 
 the Bible is the Word of God if the ChurcJj had not told you so ? 
 And where do d-issenting bodies get the English Bible if the English 
 Church had not fought for it even unto blood. If, then, they do any 
 good at all, it is with the aid of our own books ; and they would do a 
 great deal more good without the evil of division, were they united 
 with us against aU kinds of errors. 
 
 ABOUT NON-ESSENTIALS. 
 
 A great deal is said about non-essentials. You are told that 
 so long as we agree in the essentials of Beligion there is no matter 
 to what sect you belong, and that on the Last Day we shall not be 
 asked any thing about forms of church government. This is an- 
 other way to *• deceive the hearts of the simple." When the Lord 
 prays for the visible unity of His Church, that it may teaoh tha 
 
1ft 
 
 'tv'orld the truth of His Diyine Mission, is that unity a non-essential ? 
 Is it non-essential to cut and split the body of Ohrist to pieces ? 
 Is it non-essential to seperate very friends, and to cause " the love of 
 many to wax cold ?" Or should we not rather reason differently ? 
 Would it not be better to look upon non-essentials as not worth mak- 
 ing so much division and sin ? Can we have the right patience, and 
 long-suffering, and charity, when we allow non-essentials to separate 
 us irom the Church of Christ's own planting? Is it a non-essential 
 to introduce disobedience and insubordination in the army of the 
 Lord ? And if we must bear with non-essentials in open division 
 might we not bear with them much better, E^d with less self-will, in 
 unity and love ? But can we call all the doctrines that divide sects 
 non-essentials ? Are not many of them, in other parts, most hereti- 
 cal ? For my part I beheve that on the Day of Judgment we shall 
 be asked whether we have obeyed the Church of God, and our 
 " Spiritual Pastors and Masters," just as much as whether we have 
 obeyed our parents ; and this, too, is the opinion of the best Divines. 
 
 But here again I must observe that we shall be judged according 
 to the light that is in us ; therefore it is our duty to " open the eyes 
 of the blind," if it is in our power to do so. But instead of this I 
 believe that most Churchmen are more incHned to please aU parties 
 and sects, than all parties and sects are to please them, and such 
 lukewammess and worldly-mindedness can only be despised by our 
 more honest and candid opponents. Let us please all men, by all 
 means, but never at tliiB expense of truth ; and the visible unity of 
 the Church is an essential truth of the Bible, just as much as it is 
 essential " for brethren to dwell together in unity," or the members 
 of the body, to be united in "one body," to keep that body alive and 
 useful in the world. 
 
 I 
 
 .L 
 
 ' «> 
 
 t 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 In conclusion I would earneitly recommend you to procure and 
 to peruse attentively, the following books : — Bishop Wordsworth's 
 " Thiophilus AngUcanus," in English ; Bishop " Kipp's Double 
 Wittness," (against Rome and Sectarianism); "John Weiley among 
 High Churchmen," ftnd "A Presbyterian Clergyman looking for the 
 Church." ■■ ^.: ■- ■ ■ ■ /■■■■- ' ' ■ ■ ^:.:i ■.:■■!: ■'.•v:^ 
 
 i 
 
I 
 
 16 
 
 Praying God that you may all do love Christ as to love and seek 
 the truth and have grace to follow it ; and that you may see that 
 the truest charity is to point out error wherever it is, and to draw 
 our friends out of danger, submitting to God's Word, and God's Church, 
 undtr any reproach, or loss, or persecution, even as Christ and the 
 glorious army of Martyrs that have ^^one before us. 
 
 I am, 
 My dear Parishioners, 
 
 .■M 
 
 U 
 
 Yours very anxiously, " 
 
 JOHN STANNAGB. 
 April 1878. 
 
 P. S. — Lending this address to your friends of other bodies, please 
 let them understand that when I try to teach and to warn, it is in 
 love and by no means with a view to wound their feelings. J. S. 
 
 
 (