I 
 
■0 . 
 
 i^* ^tv *mr>^ A f*^ ' »v»iUMWl>i i fe,^m«w^Ww f\ > i m 
 
 CiW 
 
 -an rVM- 
 
 ipCOMMODATJON fOfe R AHWAYS 
 
 >» XHB- 
 
 # -'t 
 
 ter Froit Of till Citj If ToMiio, 
 
 -AKO «dl IHB- 
 
 LOCATION OF THE CANADIAN PACIFIC 
 RAILWAY FREIGHT YARDS. 
 
 STT 
 
 ; C. S. GZOWSKI >P W. SHANLY. ! 
 
 J. V. RBID, CITY PRINTER 73 to to ADBLAIDB STREET WESt, 
 
 ""^'** ' '' ** i i v i n r I n II ' • mn i i r < ^ .Hiio i mt 
 
:r e no H.T 
 
 -ON THF- 
 
 ACCOMMODATION FOR RAILWAYS 
 
 -ON THE- 
 
 Water Front of tie City of ToroDto, 
 
 -AND ON THE- 
 
 LOCATION OF THE CANADIAN PACIFIC 
 RAILWAY FREIGHT YARDS. 
 
 C. S. GZOWSKI ff W. SHANLY 
 
 J. Y. REID, CITY PRINTER, 73 to It ADELAIDE STREET WEST. 
 
S'^^O 
 
 1 
 
REPORr ox THE ACCOMMODATION FOR RAILWAYS ON THE WATER 
 FRONT OF THE CITY OK TORONTO, AND ON THE LOCATION OF 
 THE CANAD1A> PACIFIC RAILWAY FREIGHT YARDS. 
 
 Toronto, September 17th, 188J). 
 
 lb the Chairman and Members of a Committee of the Council of the City if Toronto : 
 
 fiEXTLEMEX, — On the I Ith July. 18' 9, your honorable Co.nmittee api>ointed 
 "re the Esplana'le and the Canadian Pacific Railway," passed the following 
 Resolution : 
 
 Ordered, — That the City Engineer, Assistant ("ity Engineer and City Sur- 
 veyor be instructed to examine (I) the locality in (juewtion ; ('2\ the plans 
 o! station grour.ds on the Esplanade, Hied by the (.'. P. Ky. Co. with the 
 Minister of Hadways on the IStli October last, an<l CJ) the other station 
 gi-ounds already acquired both at North 'I'oronto and West Toronto Junc- 
 tion, antl to prepare plans and report as to whether no other laud suitable 
 for the purjiose cannot be acquireil ; (4) whether tiie land airea<ly .icrniireil 
 and sought to be acquired is not in excess of the a -coinmolation necessary 
 lor the traffic or legitimate requirements of the Company, and to report 
 on the pi-obable cost of elevating the tracks on the water front; 
 (5) tliat Col. (izowski and Mr, Walter Shanly be consulted and requested 
 to advise on the subject. 
 
 * ' - I'ROBI.KM STATKD. 
 
 In accordance with this Resolution, we now submit the following IJoport: 
 
 The problem with which we have here to deal is one of very gnat complica- 
 tion, and one whose solution is not easy, in order that hU the interests 
 involve*! uiay be properly conserved. No one will for a moment deny that 
 it is essential for the social and commercial well-being of the City tliat rail- 
 ways .-houid have ample facilities at the Lake front for conducting their 
 passenger and freight business. No one will <leny that it is of extreme im- 
 portance to Toronto that roomy and convenient wharfage sliould be afforded 
 to vessels plying on the I^ake. The harbor in past times laid the founda- 
 tion to the City, and in the future the harbor, properly developed, will be 
 an importont factor in the City's giowth. Again, no one who has the 
 slightest acquaintance with the social conditions of this place will deny 
 that the B.iy ami Island are becoming yearly of more importance and value 
 to Toronto as resorts for pleasure and recreation to her citizens. The 
 numbei-8 carried to and from the Island by ferries are annually very large. 
 and are annually increasing. The value of the Bay for yachting and boating 
 is apparent to all who have seen Toronto on a fine stnnmer's afternoon. 
 Now, the possibility of enjoying these rights and privileges on the w.iter 
 is largely dependent upon the means of access to the water ; if this be safe 
 and convenient, more will be able to enjoy them than if it be dangerous 
 and cramped. .\nd in order to maintain ami preserve these water rights 
 and enjoyments, it is necessary that the citizens of Toronto should carefully 
 
watch and control the disposal of the water front. To allow rnilwayit to 
 coino in and, without let or hindrance, to purchase or aci(uire the water 
 front, whether for railway purposes or for any other iiurposes", with the 
 (fame ease that land niny be acquired back in the country, would be, for 
 Toronto, a suicidal jiolicy. The water front, from the Queen'H VVImrl east- 
 wards, is barely iwo miles in extent; of this, ac present, nearly one half is 
 occupied and controlled by the raihvays to the exclusion of the general 
 public and vessel business, and to permit further purchases and occupation 
 of the water front by railways would have the result of cutting off' the City 
 altogether from the Bay. Let any one go to the western part of the City, 
 and, seeing ''le condition of tlio water tiont between Simcoe Street and the 
 Queen's Whaif, covered as it is by the tracks and sidmgs of the Gr.tnd 
 Trunk Railway, ask if it is desirable that such a coniHtion of things should 
 be extended further east to Yonge Street by the construction of yards for 
 the Canadian Pacific Hallway, and but r.ne answer could be given. .Such 
 an extension, the prelude, doubtless, to further extensions in the future, 
 would be most disastrous to the City, and would utterly destroy the water front 
 for any other purposes but those of a railway freight yanl. It must be borne in 
 mind that our water front is limited ; it cannot be indefinitely extended; 
 and if it is given over to the railways to be occupied and controlled by 
 them, it cannot also be used by Lake craft, nor enjoyed by the citizens 
 generally. It is not in the interest of the railw^y3 to encourage or develop 
 busineijs by water that would act as a competitor to their business ; and 
 therefore, if the water front of the City is controlled by the railways, it may 
 reasonably be expected that the eff'ect of this will be to repress and 
 ultimately destroy the transport of freight by water. 
 
 KUNNIXO TRACES A SOlTRCl!: OF DA.VOER. 
 
 Nor is the construction of treight yards the only objectionable feature in 
 regard to the occupancy of the water front by railways. The tracks enter- 
 ing the City form a belt cutting off' the access to the water, and are a con- 
 stant source of danger to those having to cross them. At present to the 
 east of Simooe Street there are six lines ofrailway occupying the Esplanade, 
 and contiguous to the Esplanade, running along the front of the City 
 between it an<l the water. Two of these tracks are used for freight busi- 
 ness, two for the running tracks of the Grand Trunk, and two for the 
 running tracks of the Canadian Pacific Railway. Though the Cana<Iian 
 Pacific has not yet commenced to run over these lines, pending the settle 
 ment of the station site, yet it is easy to see what a source of danger this 
 railway girdle forms to those desiring to cros< to the water front. .\nd if 
 the six tracks may be thus laid down, there is nothing to prevent others 
 being added in the future .should the railways so desire. 
 
 WATER FRONT SHOULD BE MAINTAINED FREE. 
 
 It must be plain to any one who will seriously consider the question that 
 the time has arrived when the occupancy of the water front by raihvays 
 must be firmly and decidedly dealt with in order that the rights of others 
 
than the railways may not he perraanontly Uestroyecl. Though it is of vital 
 importance both to the City and the railways that the latter should have 
 proper and convenient access t<') the water, yet it is of paramount impor- 
 tance to the Ci'y to see that while granting this access it shall be done in 
 such a manner as not to take away the privileges of othors. Tn the early 
 history of Canadian railways a partial occupmcy of the City water front 
 coul«l be permitted without injury, but when this occupancy threatens to 
 absorb the whole City front and to cut it off from the water, it is neces«ary 
 that the City should step in, at whatever cost, to control and restrain it. 
 Thf\t which should be one of tlie chief beauties in the City, situated on the 
 lake, is the i-ke sljore, and if this is given over to railways without limita- 
 tion or restraint, the beauty will soon be<lestroyodan<l rendereil impossible 
 of being restored. Though the ]>opulation increases rapidly, yet as pomted 
 out before, the extent of water front is Hx>'<l and definite. Each year more 
 people deaire to use the Bay and Island, and therefore it becomes each 
 year increasingly important to guard and protect the access to the water. 
 Each year, too with the growth of population, there necessarily ari es a 
 demand for increased railway facilit'OH, and this dcmaml, perfectly 
 legitimate as it is, must be satisfied m order thnt the growth ami activity of 
 tiie City may be maintained. The prohleni of the water front r'-quires that 
 these opposing interests should both be satisfied, that each shoiil<l have 
 full scope for development, and that neither should bo sacrificed to the 
 other. 
 
 I'ASSEXOER AND FUEIOHT STATIOVS M( ST BE NEAR WATICR FRONT. 
 
 It must be assimied that the position of the general passenger stntion for 
 the railways must be near the 'vuter front, and in some pliice not far dis 
 tant from the present Union Station. The whole railway business of To- 
 ronto has grown up about this centre, and it would be impossible to make 
 any radical change in position. In like maimer it is necessary for the 
 business of the Canadian Pacific Railway that their general freight sh^ds 
 should be at or close to the water front, with access to the water for the 
 use of grain elevators or wharves, so that they may be similarly situated 
 to the Grand Trunk Company's sheds and >ard. This, and the e<tst and 
 west traffic of the Grand Trunk, necessitates bringing the tracks down to 
 the water front and running the traffic in the manner done at present. In 
 this way has arisen the belt of tracks, at present six in number, above 
 alluded to. It is absolutely nect-ssary. in the interest of the railway com- 
 panies, that access along the water front should be maintained ; without 
 this it would be impossible to miintiin pa<s»nger station or freight sheds 
 in the positions where they are most required There are two ways, and 
 only two, of safely continuing this railway access along the water front and 
 of safely continuing the street access from the City to the Bay. Either the 
 railways must pass over the street*, or the streets must pass over the rail- 
 ways. Level crossings for such a wiflth of tracks are too unsafe, and would 
 be quite impracticable across the freight yard of the Canadian Pacific if 
 placed in the position proposed between York Street and Yonge Street. 
 
UBJiiCriO.VH TO OVKRIIKAh I RIUUBi. 
 
 Ilittre are strong objections to I le urgfcl agaitiHt the oreution of overhead 
 bridjceti. In onier to have the hridge of u tuiHicient h«'ight to give IM feet 
 clear above the rails lu the law re<|uirett, the level of the road would have 
 to be at least 24 feet al>ove inil level. I'o gain this hei'.'ht ol 24 feet on a 
 gradient ot 1 in 2.j which is as ^tee|) a gradient as would be advisable in 
 such placei^, in-jlined rani|iB would have to be constructed C(M) feet in 
 length. 'Iliis length in so great that in most instances after crossing the 
 tracks there would not be huffi icnt length for the ramp to run out before 
 reaching lake Street, the new street proposed to be e^^'ablished on the 
 line of the present Windmill Line. The ramp would therefore have to 
 turn parallel to the wa'er front, .splittinit into two ramps on Ijike Street. 
 It can easily be imagined what an inconvenient mode of ocoess this would 
 be as comparetl with the access on Esplanade level. Nearly all that part 
 of the s'reet, 6(4) feut in length as above stated, wouhl be raised so much 
 above the natural level of the ground as to be inacces.»ible to stores and 
 warehouses established to the south of the railway tracks, unless inclined 
 ways were constructed leading up to the ramp; and this again occupies 
 much !i|>ace and is expensive, .^uoh a state of things would certainly have 
 a depreciating effect on the value of property south of the Esplanade, and 
 a similar effect would be felt on property north of the Esplanade. Again 
 the cost of these overhead bridges, with theu' upproaches, would be very 
 heavy. The three bridges tl>at have been suggested for John Street, York 
 Street and Yonge Street would cost, without land or liaraages, over 
 $90U,0(iU, and when land and damages are included we would probably 
 be within the mark in estimating their cost at $oOU,000. Between 
 Yonge .Street and Cheiry Street (including the latter,) a distance of 5.3UO 
 feet, there aie 1"J str»et crossings, and if we allow here lor only four more 
 overhead ciossings, with gates and watchmen at the remaining level cross- 
 ingi!, the cost of the whole would bo over f 1,OIIO,(XKJ including land and 
 damages. This sum is more than sufiicient to build all the elevated track 
 from .Simcoe .Street eastward to Cherry Street; and while the safe access 
 affonle*! by the overhead bridges would be limited to the points above 
 mentioned and obtained in the inconvenient manner described, the access 
 afforde<l by an elevated track would be complete and perfect at all points. 
 
 ELEVATKD RAILWAYS ClIEArGR THAN BKIU0E3. 
 
 It is apparent therelbre that the scheme of an elevated niilway for the 
 puri>ose o^aflonhng access to the water front is not only better than over- 
 head briilges, but it is also cheaper. Before the City had grown sufficiently 
 to make the water front access un important question, and while the railway 
 traffic remaine<l comi^aratively small so as not to be a dangerous feature on 
 the water front, the railways might continue to traverse the water front 
 streets on the level without imminent danger and without special outlay for 
 protection : but when the time bos ci me thtit owing to the increased traffic 
 to the water, and the increased traffic on the railways, it is necessary to 
 
j»rovi«le *<|)ecinl iiicaiiti ior saff hikI coiueuk'nt uccd'^s, it i^ »tcn tlmt it is 
 chen|icf nn<l liottor to i-'.ovitte the raihvays, rather titan coiutiuct ovei'ht>a(l 
 bridges. 
 
 EI.KVATKb RAILWAYS KblOMMENUED. 
 
 From tlii'se consideratiotif* thereloie we rerommend that an elevated way 
 )>(' coniiiriirie'l along the \xaier Iront, ^liviny 15 ieet cl^ai headioom under- 
 neath lor tiie jia^Huge of all otreet traffic. '.< ^ 
 
 SITB FOR NEW IMSSENdER STATION. 
 
 The adojition of this pchonie ncce.ssnrily involves the selection of an 
 elevated site for a nnion i aspenger station. That which reoonimendst itself 
 as heing a xite soon to Le availaMe, and as one having sufficient natuial 
 elevation to suit the level of rails on the iiroi>08ed viaduct, is the Mock at 
 )*re8ent occupied by the Parliament huildings, between .•'imcoe Street and 
 John .*»treot, and boundf d on the south by Front Street. This block is 
 {)40 feet in length, by 44(' feet in width. Here we would propose to erect 
 the union passenger station, making the covered shed T.JO feet in length, 
 by loO feet in width, affording Ki)ace for six parallel lines of track with 
 ample width between each (or platform accommodation. The southern 
 wall of thisi shed would coincide with the present south limit of Front 
 Street, so that this street would be wholly occupied by the station shed. 
 Front .Street would be diverted to the north of the station building and on 
 this northern side would be reseived a cpacious extent for cabs, vehicles 
 and street cars. Along the northern side of the station shed would be 
 constructed the waiting rooms, ticket offices, refreshment rooms, baggage 
 rooms, etc., etc. Access to the shed would of course be from these, and 
 there would be no need, nor any means afforded for vehicles to cross the 
 tracks at the station. The level of rails, in the station, would be approxi- 
 mately the present level of Front Street. (See Appendix " A.") 
 
 FREIGHT TRACKS PAST STATION. 
 
 To the south of the proposed station there would be placed two tracks ; 
 these would be for the accommodation of east and west bound freight busi- 
 ness, which would thus be sent past the station on the elevated track with- 
 out running through it. A retaining wall running parallel to Front Street 
 would have to be constructed here to maintain the bank carrying these 
 tracks. The approach from the west would be by a four track way con- 
 structed partly in the «olid an<l partly on a made bank supported by 
 retaining walls. Two of the tracks would be for passenger trains leading 
 to and fi-om the station, and two for freight business running past the 
 station as before described. It is necessary to retain the overhead bridge 
 at Brock Street, giving access at this point from Front Street to tlie water, 
 and in order that this may be done without unduly raising the bridge, and 
 without running up into the station on too steep a grade or bringing this 
 gra<le too close to the station entrance, we propose to place the freight and 
 passenger tracks on different levels at the passing under of Brock .Street 
 bridge, giving "Jl feet clear head room for freight cars, and 16 feet 6 inches 
 
1) 
 
 clear heafl ron n for passenger cars. To obtain this the bri<Ige would have 
 to be raided 2 feet 9 inches above its present level. The ascending grade 
 of 0-8 feet per KX) for passenger oars would then begin at a point 7.50 feet 
 west of Brock .Street bridge, pass un-ler the bri<lge with 16 feet 6 inches 
 clear head room, and gain the level of the new station 430 feet west of the 
 entrance to the shed, and from there ran in on the level. The a^Ksendrng 
 grade for freight cars (0'8 per I0(>) would stari 300 feet west of Brock 
 Street bridge, pass under the bridge with 21 f^et cle:ir head room an<I gain 
 the level of the new station nt the line of John .Street immediately at the 
 western end of the new sta'ion. At this point, of rojrse, the passenger 
 and freight tracks would bo at the same level,, and here we woild propose 
 to construct a subway on the line of John .Street, 30 feet in width, as shewn 
 on the plans, to give access to the freight sh^'ls of t!ie Grand Trunk Itail- 
 way Company. West of the points mentioned where the two ascemling 
 grades begin there would be no further alteration in existing grades and 
 only excavation required and retaining wall oonstiucted to make space lor 
 the tracks. 
 
 ELEVATED TRACKS EAST OF STATION. 
 
 Proceeding eastwards from the new station the tracks are drawn in on to 
 a 4 track viaduct in the manner shewn on the plans. The viaduct proper 
 starts at a point marked " A " on the plan, about 600 feet east of the 
 easterly end ol the new station near Simcoe Street. At this point a sun- 
 way wouM be constructed with incline learling down from Front Street, 
 giving access to the east end of the G. T. K. freight sheds The vi.iduct 
 would be of sufficient width for four tracks, placed 13 feet centre to 
 centre, and the elevation of rails would be 19 feet above Esplanade level, 
 so as to afford at least 15 feet clear head room at street cn>ssines. In 
 order to gain this height the tracks would have to ascend 3 feet (in about 
 ~0>>). from the station level. (.Set^ Appendix No. 1.) 
 
 ROUTE OF VIADUCT. 
 
 This viaduct follows the line of the Esplanade as far as Berkeley .Stref»t : 
 here it crosses property owned by the G. T. R. and continues on the line 
 of Mill Street. The full elevation above noted is continue<l to a i>oint on 
 Mill .Street about midway between Parliament Street and Trinity Street. 
 Here the gradient begins to descend and the natural level of the ground is 
 gained at Beachell Street on a gradient of 0.8 per I0»>. Near this i^oint 
 the tr-cks diverge, a double track turning northwards up the Don and a 
 double track continuing eastwards en the line of the G. T. R. 
 
 CROSSINGS OF STREETS. 
 
 Every street crossing the line of the viaduct from York .Street to Cherr>' 
 Street, inclusive — in all 16 — would have provided for it a clear opening of 
 6,6 feet, and, in all cases but one, clear headroom of 1.5 feet. In one case 
 only, that of Cherry .Street, the natural level of the street would be dis- 
 turbed. Here the surface of the street would have to be cut <iown about 
 four feet in order to give suflSeient hea Iroom. 
 
SOJ.ID VIAUCCT RECOM.MEXDED. 
 
 We have carelully consulered the various forms of structure for the via. 
 duct, and fiml that that wliich is both the cheapest to construct and the 
 cheapest to n^aintain is a soli<I via<Iuct formed of stone retaining walls en- 
 closing an earth bank. The first cost of this is tully one-third less than a 
 stceT and iron viaduct, and the difference in the cost of maintenance and 
 repairs is very much gieater than that. We would recommend this to be 
 the type of viaduct adopted, with 66 feet clear spans of steel girders at all 
 street crossings. This foi-m of viaduct will extend from the point A on 
 plan, immediately nast of .Simcoe ."Street, to Beai;hell Street, a distance of 
 8,800 feet. At this place the grade luns down and the tracks are con- 
 tinued on the natural level of the ground. 
 
 The above is briefly what we consider will afford the best and only per- 
 manent solution of the water front diflSculty. By these means and these 
 means only, safe and convenient access is afforded from the City to the 
 bay by all streets. All running tracks for through business should be 
 entirely removed from Esplanade level, ami only some tracks in the par- 
 tial manner afterwards describe I left down on the Esplanade for freight 
 business. The construction of such a viaduct as this would necessarily 
 change the character of a considerable amount of freight business that is 
 done here, and we propose to point out what these changes are and how 
 difficulties that would arise may be overcome. 
 
 G. T. R. FREIGHT YARD. 
 
 The present freight yards and sheds of the Grand Trunk would not be, 
 practically speaking, interfered with. The elevated scheme would leave 
 the 6. T. R. freight shells in their present position, and access to these 
 sheds would be i)reserved as at present by means of the subways that have 
 been described. Brock Street Bridge would remain as at present except 
 that it would be raised 2 feet 9 inches as before pointed out. By this 
 bridge access is given to the southern portion of the Grand Trunk yard. 
 The freight sidings serving the freight sheds, and those contiguous to this 
 are blind sidings at present, and are reached by the traffic that comes from 
 the east running past them and then switchmg back into them. This 
 switching back takes place near Brock Street bridge. In a similar manner 
 when the elevated scheme is adopted, freight from the east will pass over 
 the elevated track to a point a few hundred feet west of Brock Street 
 where the present yard level will be attained, and here it will be switched 
 back into the freight sidings where rerjuired. The handling of freight, so 
 far as the G. T. R. yard is concerned, would thus practically be no different 
 from what it is at present ; a consiilerable space, also, at present occupied 
 by running tracks and by the Union Station would be set free for yard 
 purposes. 
 
 C. p. R. FREIGHT YARD. , \ 
 
 The position that we would i-ecommend for the C. P. R. freight yards is 
 that lying between York and John Streets to the south of the Esplanade 
 
8 
 
 and extending from that street to the new Lake Street. The extent of 
 this blofik is 1,650 feet x about 530 feet (20^ acres). The C. P. R. Company 
 could obtain access to it from the west with their rails by pus'ting over a 
 part of the City Water Works lot. There would of course be no train 
 .'iccess from the east, but all freight business from that quarter would have 
 to pass westwartls over the elevated road and then switch baf^k into the 
 freight yard. As thit part of the Esplanade lying between Brnck Street 
 and .lohn Street appears to have become G T. property absolutely, it would 
 be necessary to construct a new street from Brock Street to give access to 
 this proposed freight yard at the west end ; this street is shown on the 
 plan. Access would also be obtained at the eastern end by York Street, 
 Esplanade and Lake Street. From this proposed yard easy and convenient 
 access CDuld be had to elevators or wharves south of Lake Street, ami we 
 would recommeml that the City should lease such sites to the Company on 
 long leasHswith rights of ren-^wal. 
 
 t XI.OADIXO FREIGHT OX ESIM.A>fADB. 
 
 Another kind of freight business that has become established by long usage 
 and which we think should le provided for, is the discharging of freight 
 into waggons on the Esplana<le from cars placed on a freight .-iding there. 
 A very large proportion of the fruit and vegetables arriving in Toronto by 
 rail is <ielivered in th s manner. Coal, lime, lumber and various cOii»'se 
 kinds of freight are also deliv^'red in this way. It is doubtless of consider- 
 al>le value to the City that this privilege of unloading on the public street 
 should if possible be maintained, and this can be done ove-- part of the 
 Esplanade front at least without st^rious detriment to the general scheme 
 For this purpose two tracks, a switching track and a siding track, might 
 remain on the level of the Esplanade from the Don yard of the <i. T. R. 
 westerly to the hue of Church Street. These tiacks would have to be 
 placd to the south of the elevate I track, and stieat ro m alongside 
 of them would have to be provided by the purchase of a strip of land 
 parallel to the Esplanade, say 33 feet in width. The tracks would lead from 
 the G. T. R. freight yard at the Don, to whicii access is obtained from the 
 elevated railway at or near to Beachell Street, at which placi^ the elevation 
 has run down to Esplana'Ie level. Direct connection can also i)e made at 
 this point with railways entering via the Don Valley so that those Inies 
 aJso could send cars on to the unloading tracks on the Esplanade. But 
 these unloading tracks should not be allowed to continue further west 
 than the line of Church Street. The central jmrt of fhe City, where the 
 main parr, of the Island feiry and steamboat passenger business is carried 
 on, should be absolutely free from tracks on the level, and therefore it 
 should be rigidly adhered to that these unloa'ling tracks or any other 
 tracks on Esplanade level are not permitted to be laid down further west 
 than Church Street. * . . 
 
 ,. J CITY WH.\RVE3 AND DOCKS TO BE BIII.T. . 
 
 In regard to the central part of the water front, viz: that lying between 
 York Street and Church Street, we think that the wisest policy for the 
 
City to pursue, anl th.it most in the interest of the citizens generally, is to 
 retain control of this and use it in the public interest. It is here, of aW 
 places on the water front, that the steamboat passenger business and the 
 Island ferriage business can properly.be centred and carried on. With the 
 viaduct scheme established, street cars can be run down to the water front 
 from all parts ot the City passing under the railway tracks, and conveying 
 passengers directly to and from tho boats. Here, too, could best be 
 established the various boat houses under lease from the City for the hire 
 of pleasure boats and yachts, enterprises that are essential to the summer 
 eryoyment of Toronto's citizens. Landing wharves and sheds should be 
 established for the use of passenger steamers plying on the lak«*, while at 
 either eml of the space mentioned there should be constructed City docks 
 for the discharge of general freight. These City docks should be main- 
 taineci by the City tmd used by any vessels on the payment of certain fixed 
 (barges. Tho policy ot the City should be to maintain direct control of at 
 least part of the water front, and to control in particular that part where 
 the chief passenger business and pleasure bu-iness — if we may use the 
 expression — ot the City is carried on. The access to the Island, and to the 
 numerous suburban pleasure re-<orts by water become yearly more 
 important, and this central | ortion of the Ci>y, above spoken of, is that 
 fi'om which this access can best be obtainel. Nor should we omit to point 
 out the great value and the great beauty it would be to Toronto to con- 
 construct on part at lesist of this space a pleasure ground for the citizens. 
 This space is now cleared of all obstructions, and if Toronto re-acquires 
 this space an opportunity is afforded of constructing what would be one of 
 the most beautiful f<atiues of this City. While the water fr.»nt of this 
 space should be used for water bu-iiness as above described, it would be 
 almost an act of spoliation to allow that part lying between the Esplanade 
 ami the wharves to be used for any other but park purposes. To allow 
 sheds or storehouses to be re-erected here would be to lose an opportunity 
 of beautifying the City and of restoring to the lake shore some of its best 
 uses that may never occur again. The money expende i on such a work as 
 this is money that will be well laid out. 
 
 TRACKS EAST OF DOX. 
 
 It will lie noticed that we have not recommended the construction of 
 elevated track-* further east than the Don River. Ihe reasons for this are: 
 1st. The savmg of expense, and 2nd. Because east of the D<m Uiver the 
 elevation of the tracks is not in any way required to preserve the access to 
 the water fiont. No doubt to' elevate the tracks here would be a good 
 means for »-fFording safe crossings for the streets, but the matter that we 
 have to deal with at present is the preservation of the water f out, and if 
 in the future some scheme is required to atibrd such street crossings east 
 of the Don, and if no other cheaper method can be devised than construct- 
 ing an elevated way, this can be added. The construction or tho non-con- 
 struction of elevated tracks east of the Don does not in any way afifect the 
 scheme for preserving the access to the water front, and therefore, in the 
 meantime we have not considered it prudent to deal with it. 
 
10 
 
 RIVER DON TRAFFIC. 
 
 In the same way we have not thought it necessary to touch upon the 
 qu- stion of elevated tracks along the hank of the Don river in the position 
 in which the Canadian Pacific are at present desiring to eiiier (he City. 
 The whole question of whether or not the hankn of the straightened Don 
 shall he used by vessels as wharves for loading or discharging freight 
 hinges upon the question whether or not vessels can enter the Don. At 
 present, owing to the Grand Trunk bridge at the mouth of the river being 
 a fix.'il bridge, they cannot do so, and though this obstruction may by 
 legislation bo removed, yet, in the meantime, it remains there. When it 
 is removed, the necessity of elevated tracks on the banks of the Don may 
 be conceded, in order that full ush of the Don as a wharf may b'' enjoyed } 
 but the addition of such elevated tracks would in no way affect 'he scheme 
 which we have proposed in regard to the settlement of the water front 
 problem. These elevated tracks would simplj form a continuation of 
 those which we have proposed, and can be a Ided whenever the need for 
 their erection arises. At the same time we believe that the opening of the 
 Don to vessel traffic is a contingency that should not be lost sight of, and 
 though this opening up may not be done at once, yet the City should not 
 bIIow this right to be taken away, nor allow herself to be put in such a posi- 
 tion, either by the occupancy of the banks of the Don by railways or other- 
 wise as would preclude her from taking full advantage of the opening up 
 of the river to traffic whenever this may be done. 
 
 STATEMENT OF GRADES AND COSTS. 
 
 With this Report there is enclosed a tabular statement of th various levels 
 and grades involved in the scheme. (.Appendix No. 1.) We al!>o enclose 
 an estimate of the cost of the works we have recommended (Appendix No. 
 2), and in connection with this estimate we show a comparison of the cost 
 of overhead bridges constructed to afford access to the water front. (Ap - 
 pendix No. 3.) It will be seen that the cost of constructing overhead 
 bridges at as many points as possible would cost much more than the 
 elevated track, and even then there would be three streets, Simcoe, Lome 
 and Bay Streets, whose access to the water would be cut off. By the 
 elevated scheme access would be afforded at every point, and at much 
 less cost. 
 
 The plan proposed for tlin settlement of the difficulties on the water front 
 may appear costly, but we are confident that nothing short of a scheme 
 such as we have proposed will afford a satisfactory solution of the problem. 
 To allow the C. P. R. Company to acquire lands in the position sought and 
 to own and control the water front in the manner they propose, would be 
 little short of disastrous to the City. So much of the water front is already 
 in the hands of railway companies that the City should strive to the utmost 
 to prevent any further acquisition of it in a similar manner. The Granfl 
 Trunk, Northern and other railway companies have in years past acquired 
 so much of the water front, at a time when the City did not set much store 
 
11 
 
 upon it. that this is all t'lP stronger reison why the alienation of what re- 
 mains should he carefuil> watche<l and g'larded by the City. Much of the 
 land of the City front that is held by railways is merely used as unsightly 
 storage yards for freight cars, a pur|>ose which could just as well be served 
 by yard room out beyond the City limits. Tlio yanl room occupied by the 
 railways on the City front should ^>e that n<»eded only for freight business 
 pure and simple and the necessary h idling of passenger cars, and should 
 not be given up to the storage oi' cars. Th*" amount of 'and which the 
 . Grand Trunk Raihvav now owns and controls on the City front is far in 
 excess of tht' legitimate nee<ls of its freight and passenger business pure 
 and simple; and. recognizing this, there i< the greater reason why the City 
 should for the futu e be extremely guanied in permitting the establish- 
 ment of freight yards or repair shops on the City front. The space re- 
 conunemletl in this lieport for lh»* freight yards of the C. P. R. is sufficient 
 for carrying on the freight business that has to be brought down to the 
 water front. More land than that should not be given, and the City, while 
 permitting this purcha-e, should tirmly resist any attempt on the part of 
 the railway company to i xercise the rights of ownership or control over 
 the water front lying beyond, except under lease from th«» City. 
 
 We would point out to your honorable Committee the great necessitv theie 
 is lor limiting the ).owei-s of the railway companit-s in regard to the 
 compulsory ac<iuirement of land in such positions as th<* fiont of 
 thisCiiy. Uncler the compuNory clauses of ^he G"ner;il Railway Act, a 
 railw.iy company has power to buy land anywhere, and can over-ride the 
 rights of individuals or corporations. If the central part of the City is lai^l 
 out in the m <nner we recommend, and re«erve<l for the vessel business and 
 the pleasure traffic of the City, there yet seems to be nothing to prevent 
 any railway company from iu^quiring by compulsory purchase the very land 
 that the City had laid out as a pleasure ground, and those wh.-irves and 
 itocks whiclf she had constructed for public use and public benefit. We 
 think that in the settlement of this question there should be some definite 
 limit set t" the right of railwavs in acquire land so situated, and some certain 
 security should be given for th<' permanent ownership of the land which 
 the City desires to hold. At present this ownership depends largely upon 
 the personal opinion of the members of the Corporation. If a majority 
 were willing to permit a compulsory sale of the City front to a railway 
 Company there would be no possibility of preventing it. There can be no 
 doubt that the large amount of land acquired by the G. T. R. and other 
 companies in the past time has been acquired chiefly for this reason, that 
 the City at that time was not sufficiently alive to the importance of retain- 
 ing control of the water front. 
 
 STATION GROUNDS OWNBD BT THB CANADIAN PACinC RAILWAY. 
 
 We have examined the station grounds owned and occupied by the 
 Canadian Pacific Railway at North Toront-», West Toronto and Park- 
 dale. At North Toronto there are 2u^ acres, at West Toronto Junction 
 44 acres, and 'it Parkdale 11 acres. At or near to the point where the Don 
 
12 
 
 branch leaves the main line of the Canadian Pacific Railway ia a place that 
 we would suggest for the establishment of a yard, should the Company 
 require more room. Here freight trains could be broken up and those cars 
 switched out that had to be sent down to the City front, or to the lake 
 shore. Through freight should go by the line to the north of the City, and 
 provision should be made for the storage and repair of cars in other places 
 than on the City front. It should be the aim of the City to restrain as 
 much as possible and keep within bounds the use of the water front for 
 freight purposes. 
 
 Respectfully submitted. 
 
 Granvillb C. Cu.vningham, 
 
 Assistant City Engineer. 
 
 VlLLIEUS Sankby, 
 
 City Surveyor. 
 ToBONTO, 17 th September, 1889. 
 
 APPENDIX No. 1. ' • •:' . 
 
 Table of Levels for the Elevated Railway on the Water Front, Toronto. 
 
 Esplanade level , 47*0 above datum- 
 Rail level of elevated track on Esplanade &frO " 
 
 Rail level of station at Parliament House block OS-O '' 
 
 Present level of ground at Front and Simcoe Streets.... 61-6 " 
 
 Present level of ground at Front and .John i^treets 67-0 •' 
 
 Rail level at John Street subway 630 " 
 
 Street level underneath in subway 46*0 '• 
 
 Rail level freight tracks at Brock Street bridge 518 " 
 
 Bridge level over tracks 75*75 " 
 
 Rail level passenger tracks at Brock Street , 54*8 " 
 
 Bridge level over passsenger tracks 74*3 " 
 
 Granville C. Cunningham, 
 
 Assistant City Engineer. 
 
 ..I 
 
 APPEVDIX No. 2 SHEET 1. 
 
 Summary of total cost of elevated tracks, station buildings, land, damages, etc., 
 
 for City front, Toronto. 
 
 Total cost of elevated track, station, subways, approaches, 
 
 &c., as per Sheet No. 2 11,700,000 00 
 
 Purchase of land at various points to widen streets, &g,, for 
 station site on Parliament Building block, and sum to 
 recoup C. P. R. for purchase of land and work done on 
 same 1,277.000 00 
 
 Grand total $2,977,000 00 
 
c: 
 
 U2 
 
 y 
 
 r 
 
 i * 
 
 r- .. ix 
 
j: ACCOMPANY REPORT 
 
 <^__3^so/i the ^i^ 
 
 mmmm®@effmn wok RAiLw^kYS. 
 
 .;•; -.«#s ON THE 4^::.- «: 
 
 WATER PROMT, 
 CITV OF TORONTO. 
 
 O lOOO' 
 
 _^ 
 
 2000' 
 
 — I 
 
 >^p i'* 
 

 /y^k/2 ^/fS^ 
 
 
«. > 
 
 » I 
 
 
 4 i 
 
 ^^'^ 
 
 
 ^- 
 
. /■• 
 
 13 
 
 APPENDIX No. •i.—^-^HEET 2. 
 
 Summary of cost of elevated tracks, stafinn, station ground Ac, Jor City 
 
 front, Toronto. 
 
 Coat of we»t approach to station ground on Parliament 
 Building site from Bathiirst Street, including retaining 
 
 walls, raising Brock Street bridge, &c . $130,000 <)0 
 
 Subway on line of John Street 4U,0<M) 00 
 
 Preparing station ground, building retaining wall, &o 4"i,300 00 
 
 * Rails, ties and ballast 4",000 00 
 
 Station building, complete 5(X),0LH) 00 
 
 Solid viaduct, complete, from point A near Simcoe Street to 
 Beachell Street, including 17 street openings, each 6fi 
 
 feet in width 701,'2<X) 00 
 
 Add for contingencies, engineering, &c 14f»,9(X) 00 
 
 *1.70(),U0U (K) 
 
 APPENDIX No. 3. 
 
 Comparison of Coat of Overhead Bridges with Elevated Railroad on 
 
 the water front. 
 
 Between Beachell Strict and Simcoe Street. By the overhead bridge 
 scheme it is propo.icd to block Simcoe, Lornf< and Bay >treets, cutting 
 them off from the water. 
 
 It is proposed to construct bridges on York and Yonge 
 
 Streets; cost (without land) $iyG,(XJO 00 
 
 Land for same 20.i,(XX) 00 
 
 12 streets cross to the enst of Yonge Street, between it 
 and Beachell, and if overhead crossings were made for 
 each, this cost would be 181, HOa each 981,6(10 00 
 
 While the cost of street access for those would be fully 800.000 00 
 
 $1,777,600 00 
 The co&t of the elevated road from Beachell Street to Simcoe 
 Street, giving perfectly free and safe access under the 
 tracks at 17 points, and blocking none of the streets. ... ^"91,"20() 00 
 Land damages on this part 273,OtX) » 
 
 . , , $l,0li4,-J«K) 00 
 
 In constructing these overhead bridges it would be found that it was 
 cheaper and better to purchase an independent street line lor the ramp, 
 rather than to construct this ramp on the line of the existing street Fo:- 
 instance, in constructing an overhead bridge across the tracks at Yonge 
 Street, if a ramp were constructed in the middle of Yonge Street, between 
 Front Street and the Esplanade, rising up to a height of twenty*four feet 
 
14 
 
 ahoTA the rails on tho EapI<in<i(I«>, tho (Innings of th'« to the street woiil<l he 
 •o great as to practically <i<>stroy it. The ramp loa'ling t'l tho overhead 
 croming would have to be at least forty-six feet wide. This, i:i tho ini<l<lle of 
 a sixty-six foot street, would leave only narrow ten fe(>t ways on either side. 
 .Such a ctindition of things would practically destroy Yonge Street, and the 
 damages arising from the construction of the ramp would be the value of 
 both sides of the street, besiilos tho damage to neighhorinir places for 
 blocking their way. This cost would be enormous, and for this reason it 
 would Ih» found much less costly to purchiiso indepondent street access 
 close to the streets ai>ove name<l. It is upon this assumption that the 
 foregoing fstimate of damage is basfd ; that independent street aocess 
 would be >)OUght , 
 
 (S«I.) OkaNVH.I.E f\ '"UVNINOIIAM, 
 
 * A»aislaiit I'iti/ Eni/ineer 
 
 TonoxTO, September 2lst, 1889 • 
 
 John Blevinit, E»q , City Clerk, Toronto : 
 
 MR, — In .July last we received from you copy of an order made by '' the 
 .Special Committee of the City Council ap])omted to piotect the City's 
 interest in the ma'ter of the expropriation of a pi»rtion of tiio Ksplanade, 
 Ac." The order i-* as follows: 
 
 ••That the City Engineer, .\s»ista't Engineer and City Purveyor l>e instructed 
 to examine : ( I ) The locality in question ; (2) the plans of station grounds 
 on the Elsplanade fyled by the Canadian Pacific Kuilway Company with the 
 Minister of Railways on loth October, I8M8; and (8) the other station 
 grounds already acquired both at North I oronto ami West 'I oron to Junction, 
 and to prepare plans and report as to whether no other ground suitable for 
 the purpose can be acqui-ed, and whether the lana already acquired and 
 sought lo be acquired is not in excess of the accommodation necessary for 
 the traffic or legitimate requirements of the Company, and to report on the 
 probftble cost of elevating the tracks on the water front, and. lurlher, that 
 Col Gzowski and Walter Shanly, Esq., C.E., be appointed Consulting En- 
 ^ gineers to act with the City Engineer- on behalf of the City in this matter." 
 
 Acting on the authority thus vested in us we did not delay to place our 
 selves in communication with Mr. Cunningham, Assistant Engineer, and 
 Mr. >"ankey, City Surveyor, (the City Engineer, Mr. Sproatt, was then and 
 for some time afterwards absent on vacation), and after going over the 
 ground and examining plans, &o., we arranged with them for the preparing 
 of certain other plans and the collating of certain other kinds of informa- 
 tion essential to a full understanding of the matters to be dealt with. 
 
1.-) 
 
 The work tliUH oiitlinod could not be done in a day, and aocorlinj^ly it wai 
 not until ihc early dnyn nf this month that the required information, in 
 its several forniH, wan ronipleted bo as to allow of the diHcuHHion and, as 
 far an now possible, the perfecting of a plan, with estimate of cost, best 
 adapted to mt>ot the wants of nml harmoiiizo all interests involved in the 
 somewhat complicated Ksplanaie question. 
 
 Since then we have been in almost daily intercourse with Mesrs. Cunning 
 ham and Sankey, and the whole subject, covering plan and cost of con 
 . Btruction un<l estimated probable amount for luiids and ilamagos, has licun 
 fulh and soarchingly canvasMud Mr. Ciumingham's report will be found 
 to be an able and exhaustive exposition of all matters involved and has 
 our unqiialitied endorsement, but we titink it desirable that we should 
 over our own signatures revi 'W the questions at issue, giving u descriptive 
 outline of the propose! scheme of improvement and recommending its 
 adoption as the one way ny which all conflicting interests may be recon. 
 oiled and all n-asonable accommodation secured in fair proportions to the 
 railway companies, t > navigation an 1 to the citizens a^ large. 
 
 The carrying out of any plan combining all the main objects aimed at 
 could not under any circumstances be other than a large undertaking for 
 a growing city sucb as Toronto, having other large and indispensable works 
 to provide for, hut as we find things to day there exist certain special con- 
 ditions whiah must add largely to the difficulties and cost of Ksplanade 
 improvements as compared with what would have to be encoiiiitt'r.-d liul 
 all to be done *'out of the new " Evils, rajudly growing to be intolerable, 
 have to be remedied, and their continuance and extension provideil 
 against for all time. 
 
 The special conditions may be stated as follows : The water front of ilie (,'ity 
 known as *» the Esplanade," is gradually, but not slowly, assuming the 
 character of a vast railway station in the occupancy of Canada's two great 
 railway corporations. 
 
 Except at two points (to the west of Union Station) where overhead 
 , bridges have been constructed, the bay, or harbour, cannot be reached 
 from the (Jity without the crossing at grade of not fewer than six lines of 
 rail over which the running of trains, by day and by night, is yearly on the 
 increase. 
 
 Commensurate with <he gi-owth of the City is the increase of inconvenience 
 and danger due to the sixteen level crossings between Union Station and 
 the Don — a distance of coufiderably l^as than two miles. The Bay and the 
 \l- Island form two of the most attractive features of the City. The good will 
 he largely taken out of both unless the railway obstruction be effectually 
 abated. 
 
 The railway companies, while not always in harmonious accord between 
 themselves, would seem to have one object in common — the complete 
 absorption of the water front for their own uses. One corporation already 
 
possesses more than a third of the harbor line ; the other h.is acquired, or 
 is seeking to acquire, all that is most valuable oK what remains. The 
 objects of the Companies would, therefore, seem to be to a gr^at extent 
 antagonistic to the interests of navigation and what may be termed the 
 natural privileges attaching to the water. While believing, and fu\vo- 
 eating, that the railways should be afforded all possible proper facilities 
 for their City traffic on the Esplanade, and the Companies duly protecte 1 
 in the exercise of their rights and in quiet possession of their properties, 
 we are equally strong in the convi<tion that they (t^he Companies) can be 
 left secure in the e- joyenent of all their Just privileges without, as now, 
 placing the people of Toronto at a disadvan'age in the enjoyment of theirs. 
 
 The main points of "improvement" to be considered are: 
 
 Ist. The doing «way to the greatest extent practicable of " level erodings," 
 and at the same time preserving intact all, or as many as po.^sible. ol the 
 existing streets leading to the Bay. 
 
 2n(l. The preservation, wholly untouched by radway tracks, of a portion of 
 the water front for citizens' uses only, in connection with the Bay. 
 
 3;<l A Union Passenger Station lo meet the futme needs of a la»ge City. 
 
 Ti'king up tliese points in the foregoing oidi r we come first to the ques- 
 tion ol 
 
 STKEET UROSSINOS. 
 
 To get rid of the level crossing evil, there are just two modes of tieatment 
 |io>sible — to lift the streets over the rai.ways, or else lilt the lailways over 
 the streets. 
 
 The fiist named method means the building of overhead bridiie-. From 
 John Street to Cherry Street there are seventeen streets leading down to 
 the Esplanade, every one of them with the exception of John Street open 
 and in common use. Owing to the natural conformation of the ground it 
 wouM not be practicble to liridge all of th<se streets — about sevi-n might 
 bo dealt with on the overhead plan. As highways to the water the oiher 
 I en would have to be abandoned or else kept open, subject, as now, to all 
 the dangers and inconveniences of track crossing. 
 
 The natural conformation of ground, above referred to as making the 
 bridging of all the streets not practicable, would also cause the bridges, 
 where built, to be very expensive of construction and inconvenient in use 
 \*hen built. The " Ramp " system would of necessity have to be adopted 
 in sloping the roadways down to Esplanade level ; an awkward round«bout 
 way of ascent and descent for heavily laden vehicles. Reference to the 
 plans accompanying Mr. Cunningham's Report will make easily understood 
 the mode of construction that would have to be followed in the bridging of 
 streets. The cost of seven such bridges would, including damages to pro- 
 perty, exceed a million of dollars. 
 
 We now come to the alternative plan — the lifting of the railways over the 
 streets, in other words the 
 
17 
 
 VIADUCT ST9TBM. 
 
 On this plan the rails woalH be laid at an elevation above Esplanade level 
 Aufflcient to give fifteen feet clear headway to every street from Simcoe to 
 Cherry Street, both included. Not one street need be abandonel or in- 
 terfered with in any way, but all left free and open to the wat'jr, unim- 
 peded by tracks or trains From every point of view the viaduct plan is 
 so widely superior to the overhead bridges plan that we unhesitatingly re- 
 commend its adoption. Fuither on we will touch on the mode of con- 
 struction which we think the most desirable. 
 
 WATER FROXT RESERVB. 
 
 We deem it to be absolutely essential to the well-being of commerce be- 
 tween the City and the railways that there should he ample room on the 
 Esplanade for the handling ot freigbt, but we also believe that all needed 
 accommodation can be afforderl without giving up the entire harbor front 
 to railway uses. 
 
 West of Simcoe Street the Grand Trunk Railway Company own large 
 grounds, occupied by numerous tracks, with freight shed and other build- 
 ings. In the plan now under consideration it is not even suggested to 
 meddle with any of these. From Batburst Street to Simcoe Stroft all 
 Grand Trunk property would, in so far as the City's intentions are con- 
 cerned. 1)6 left undisturbed. 
 
 At the Don the same Company hoM larg.» Ian J possessions with which, or 
 the structures thereupon, the viaduct wouKI not interfere. In respect of 
 freighting conveniences, then, at either end, tiie contemplateil new works 
 would leave the <irand Trunk just about where it is today, save ihat in 
 the mode of transfer of freight from west to east and vice versa, some 
 ohmge would require to be made. This latter point will be found enlarged 
 upon in Mr. Cunningham's report. 
 
 The Canadian Pacific Railway is a new-comer in Toronto and can hanlly 
 yet be said to be domiciled on the Esi)lanade. Any disturbance, there- 
 fore, created by the changes the City has in view will be derange meat of 
 plan rather than of fixtures, and differences between the parties ought 
 surely to be susceptible of being accommodated without any extraordinary 
 degree of friction. 
 
 At the Don the Company has acquire«l land enough to meet the- wants ot 
 whatever business they may build up ui that quarter. This land will not 
 be impinged upon in the carrying out of the viaduct scheme. 
 
 In the west they have, by lease or purchase, or both, acquired, or set about 
 acquiring, many water lots from John Street to York Street. It is to be 
 hoped that the company may succeed in securing the whole of that frontage, 
 giving them a lenjith of about 1,650 feet along the water and securing to 
 them space enough for a commodious freight yard for west end business. 
 Access to it from the City will be found provided for on tne plan of Esplan- 
 ade improvements accompanying the iteportof the Assistant City Engineer. 
 
M 
 
 It is also proposed to lay two tracks on Esplanade level, alongside and to 
 the south of the viaduct, from the Don, where they would connect with 
 the Grand Trunk and with the Pacific lines, as far west as (^"hurch Street. 
 These tracks to be for the accommodation of that class of railway business 
 which (legitimatized by usage) is now carried on upon that portion of the 
 Esplanade, the cars being loaded or unloaded oy sliippers or receivers of 
 freight to suit their own time and convenience. 
 
 From the above it may be gathered that, fiom the west, no tracks on 
 Esplanade level would reach further east than York Street, or from the 
 east no further west than Church Street. 'I'hat is exactly what is designed 
 and that all through connection be made over the elevated lines on the 
 viaduct. 
 
 The space between York Street and Church Street would then form what 
 we have termed the " Water Front Reserve," wholly freed from railway 
 tracks and a}iproachable on the land side without let or hindrance by four 
 of the leading streets of the City. This reserve would measure some 2,460 
 feet along the bay with an average depth, or width, of about 740 feet ; com- 
 prising an area of some 42 acres, in this calculation the " New Windmill 
 Line" is taken as the front of the enclosure. 
 
 The question of what to do with this fine piece of public property will be 
 for the City to decide. Of its great value to the citizens generally there 
 can be no doubt to all, whether looked at from the practical and useful or 
 from the pleasure and ornamental stand point. In the season of open 
 water it would be one of the "lungs cf the City." The port for steamers, 
 yachts, pleasure boats and the Park and Island ferries, and would afiord 
 free, safe and pleasant access to Toronto's noble Bay the year round. 
 
 UXIOX PASSENOKR STATION. 
 
 The proper site for this, it may in fact be said the one available site in con« 
 nection with the elevating of the railway tracks, is the block of land where 
 stand the old Parliament Buildings — now soon to be abandoned. The 
 block extends from John Street to Simcoe Street, 940 feet, and has a depth, 
 Front Street to Wellington Street, of 440 feet. For station uses it would 
 be necessary to acquire the whole Front Street front by about one half the 
 depth of the property. The station building, looking to the now assured 
 growth of Toronto, should be 7.50 feet long by 150 feet wide, and, not count- 
 ing the price of the land, could be built for about |<50'),000 in a style of 
 architecture to be an ornament to the City, and, in plan, to secure every 
 possible convenience to the railways and the public. The plan of 
 Esplanade improvements and Mr Cunningham's Report will show and 
 explain the position and track arrangement of the proposed station house 
 and surroundings, and the changes necessary to be made in the adjoining 
 streets 
 
 PLAN OF ELEVATED RAILWAY AND VUDUOT. 
 
 The general level of the ground along where the station would be is about 
 16 feet above Esplanade level The west approach to the station would 
 
19 
 
 commence on Esplnninle level near Bathurst Street, and from there slope 
 upwards on a sufficiently easy grade (in railway phraseology "42 feet per 
 mile,") reachmg the higher level near Windsor Street. The construction 
 of this incline wouid be of solid earth work retained between walls of 
 masonry. It would infringe on no ground now in railway use »t Esplanade 
 level, but would occupy the slope and "boulevard " south of Front Street. 
 It would be wide enough for four lines of rail, the two inner (northerly) 
 tracks (or passenger t?ains, the two outer ones for freight service. From 
 the point near Windsor Street the passenger tracks would curve gently 
 northward, entering the station at John street. Tiie freight lines would 
 keep straight on, passing outside the station building along wliat is now 
 the edge of the Esplanade slope, where they would he kept in place by ft 
 retaining wall. A little to the east of ihe station the four lines would 
 again come into companionship, and at that point the viaduct proper 
 would begin, whence angling across the present Union Station lot it would 
 reach Esplanade Street, just east of York Street. From there the viaduct 
 would be along (over) Esplanade Street all the way to Berkeley Street and 
 then into Mill Street. At Trinity Street the eastern slope would commence, 
 and, descending at the same late of gradient as the western one, would 
 touch Esplanade level at or near Beachell Street— where the rails would 
 join th<^ existing ones of the (Iraud Trunk and those still to be laid by the 
 Canadian Pacific Hallway. 
 
 From Batlinrst Street to Beachell Street the whole length covered by the 
 ])roposed work is 13,70.') feet=2j'„ miles. 
 
 Of which the viaduct proper, .'^imcoe Street to Beachell .Street, occupies 
 8,9-.'()leet=:lT7g miles. 
 
 The height of the viiiduct to be such as to give 15 feet clear headway to 
 every street except Beachell Street, which, of necessity, would have to be 
 left "at grade." 
 
 PLAN OF CONSTRUCTIOX. 
 
 In debating the plan or system of construction for the elevated railway, or 
 viaduct, we carefully weighed tiie respective merits of (I) The steel 
 trestle work syst. m ; (12) Solid work of masonry and earth ; and found the 
 advantages both in point of structural cost and future maintenance to be 
 so largely in favor of the latter that we decided to recommend its adoption, 
 and accordingly upon that plan the estiina e of cost has been based. 
 
 With the height of viaduct to be dealt with in this case (about 18 feet), 
 solid work will be cheaper than the steel work by fully $700,00'*. 
 
 In respect of the never ending item of "maintenance," the saving of outlay 
 would be so • noimously on the side of the solid plan as almost to debar 
 comparison between the two systems. 
 
 The steel structure would all require looking after and frequent repairs 
 The item ol painting alone, necessary every few years, would amount to a 
 startling sum, while the track system, not resting on ballast, would quickly 
 wear out and therefore be constantly in need of mechanical renewals. 
 
zo 
 
 The solid structure, on the other hand, once completed would call for no 
 outlay below the level of the ties. It would ^^e permanent and enduring 
 in all its parts. The track system would be that of any ordinary railway, 
 resting on earth as firm as the natural ground and requiring no more than 
 the usual per mile outlay for repairs and renewals. The bridges would of 
 course add something more than the average to maintenance account, but 
 not enough to warrant the addition being mnde a special item in the half- 
 yearly statement of repairs. 
 
 The mode of construction to be followed is as follows : 
 
 Two parallel walls of heavy masonry, carried up to a height of about IS 
 feet above Esplanade surface, retain between them an earthen emViank- 
 ment. The top width of the structure from out to out of wall-coping to he 
 50 feet, giving ample room on the earthwork for four tiacks. The street 
 openings, in every instance of the full width of 66 feet, to be crossed by 
 steel plate girders. A simpler or more enduring form of construction for 
 the whole work could not well be devised. ' 
 
 COST. 
 
 The whole cost of the whole undertaking is placed at $2,977,000 (X) 
 
 Of which for lands and damages 1,277,000 00 
 
 Leaving for construction $1,700,000 00 
 
 It is not claimed that the sum put down opposite " I^nds and Damages " is 
 any more than an approximation to what the expenditure under that 
 heading may possibly reach, experience having taught us that the cost of 
 what in railway works is included under the general designation of right-of- 
 way can never be confidently pronounced upon until after publication of 
 awards. The City Surveyor has been at much pains in furnishing informa- 
 tion as to lands and buildings to be interfered with by the proposed 
 structures, together with their assessed valuations. 
 
 Of the sum allotted to construction, we are confident that it will i)rove 
 ample for the carrying out of the work in the most substantial and 
 permanent manner. Details of the nmount will be found in the appendices 
 to Mr. Cunningham's Report. 
 
 FINANCIAL QUESTION. 
 
 It may be proper to say here that, as the matters on which our counsel has 
 been asked do not include financial arranjtcments, it was our intention to 
 confine our opinions to engineeriiig questions only, viz.. Plans ari Estimate 
 of Cost; but having read the recently published Report of Mr. A. M. 
 Wellington, C.E., addressed to the Toronto Boanl of Trade, we observe that 
 he enters pretty freely into the financial question, suggesting certain 
 arrangements between the City and the Grand Trunk and Canadian Pacific 
 Railway Companies, with regard to which we would just say, without 
 venturing an opinion as to how far these 8uggestic»i8 might be made 
 applicable to the carrying out of the scheme of impiovemunt, that we think 
 
21 
 
 that aiTangements of the kind will be best discussed between those who 
 have the care and direction of the City'p finances and the railway com- 
 panies interested. 
 
 While on this subject, however, we desire to point out certain matters 
 connected with or resulting from the completing of the project under 
 debate which strike us &s sure to effect tangible economies to the com 
 panies — as well in the outlay of capital as in working expenses. 
 
 They, the companies, would be relieved ot the cost of bridging some of the 
 streets and of maintaining gates and guards at all other remaining level 
 crossings. 
 
 The construction of a new Union Station would release from pas^senger uses 
 the now existing station, occupied jointly by the two companies, and, with- 
 out disturbance of the rails leading to it frcm the west, leave it available 
 lor other purposes. 
 
 The risk of casualities due to streets crossing the rails at grade is constantly 
 increasing in Toronto with the increase of population and traffic. Immunity 
 from that class of accidents, and consequent erpense, would be assured by 
 the construction of the viaduct, and would effect a sure saving of money to 
 the railway corporations, while at the same time bringing with it a relieving 
 sense of security to them and to the public. 
 
 Concurrently with the doing away with the evil of level crossings would 
 come the advantage to the Companies of being able to run through trains 
 uninterruptedly and at speed from end to end of the Esplanade, instead of, 
 as now, creeping cautiously along with a danger point in sight at eveiy 
 street. The money-gain in this change in the movement of trains, and it 
 would apply upon all trains, would form no contemptible item in reduction 
 of working expenses. 
 
 Besides those pointed out above, other material advantages to both railway 
 companies will doubtless develop as the plan of improvement recommended 
 comes to be considered and discussed in fuller detail. 
 
 The City, too, would find some valuable assets at its account tending to 
 retluce the estimated cost of the projected undertaking. In the amount 
 herein above set down for lands and damages is included the purchase of 
 the whole block occupied by the Parliament Buildings, on the adsumption 
 that the Government may not be willing to dispose of it except en bloc. 
 The whole would not be needed for station and street use.«, so that about 
 half of the property, with the entire Wellington Street front, would be 
 available for sale in valuable building lots. 
 
 The re-possession of certain properties now owned by one of the railway 
 companies, and payment for which is included in our estimate, will form 
 another considerable asset for the Citv. 
 
n 
 
 TORONTO BEYOND THIS DON. 
 
 Our instructions do not seem to contemplate our dealing with the elevat*^! 
 railway question beyond Esplanade limits eastward, but notin;z that Mr. 
 Wellington, in the Report to which we hHve above alluded, suggests carry- 
 ing his high level line over the Don by means of a drawbridge, and there- 
 fore extending it some distance east of ttie river, we wish to aay that we 
 do not consider any such extension either necessary or desirable at the 
 present time. The difficulties, financial and other, to lie encountered in 
 maturing the scheme recommended by us will be found quite enough to 
 tax the ability of the City financiers without the introduction of what we 
 will call the discordant drawbridge element with its attendant expenses- 
 When at a future day it may be found desirable to extend the viaduct 
 system over the Don there will be no difficulties to overcome except the 
 inevitable financial one and the controversy certain to grow out of wanti' g 
 to cross the river by draw-bridge. 
 
 OUTLYING STATION GROUNDS, CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY. 
 
 Of these there are three : West Toronto Junction, 44 acres ; North Toronto, 
 20 acres; Parkdale, II acres. • 
 
 These binds will, we believe, all be wanted and come in u-iefiiily for riiilw.iy 
 jiurposes and to the general advantage of the public. The line to the 
 north may be said to give the City a second front. It has aire idy greatly 
 stimulated growth in that direction, and will of course require enlarged 
 station accommodation, with room lor workshops, &c., as the growth 
 advanc«'S, but we fail to see what bearing the possession of these properties 
 by the Pacific Railway Company can possibly have on the Ksplanade 
 question, so obviously is it m the City's interests that every Treasonable 
 facility for freighting on the water front should be allowed to all railways. 
 
 THE DON. 
 
 The works known as the '• Don Improvements Act," 49 Victoria, cap. 66, 
 1 he Act provides that a space of 125 feet be reserved on the western bank 
 of the stream for the use of a street and railway tr.icks — but the latter i«» 
 be not for the exclusive use of any one road I'he spane is quite suffirieni 
 for laymg down four lines of rail with a street or waggon road alongsid*-. 
 Four tracKs ought to be sufficient for all railway uses at this place and the 
 manner of using them should be a matter of niutu>«l arrangement or agree- 
 ment between the City and the several railway companies, 
 
 The improvement of the River Don is, beyond all doubt, a great benefit to 
 the City from a sanitary point of view. The straightening and widening 
 of its originally narrow and tortuous channel, and the increasing of its 
 depth, give more freedom to the cunent, while the reclaiming by means 
 of the dredged material of a large area of low and swampy land furnishes 
 valuable sites for the erection of buildings for warehouses, fac tories and 
 other business purposes, and should tend to largely recoup the outlay 
 incurred. 
 
23 
 
 CONCI.CSIOH. 
 
 It will be seen from what we have written that in general design the plan, 
 the adoption ol' which we advise is similar to that recommended by Mr. 
 Wellington, the elevating of the railways, the reserving of a portion of the 
 water front from railway intrusion and the placing of the passenger station 
 being features common to his Report and ours, though in details we are on 
 most points far apart. For the ever-increasing risk to life and detriment to 
 property consequent on City and railway traffic being carried on upon the 
 same plane in a net-work of rails there is but one eftVctuai leraedy jiossible 
 — the lifting of the tracks high above Esplanade levfl. The cost of the 
 undertaking will undoubtedly be a serious obligation for the City to 
 face, but after ail not so vry much more serious for the Toronto 
 of to-day than was the construction of the existing Esplanaiie and the 
 liberal aid given to railways by the Toronto of five and thirty years 
 ago. The present condition of things upon the City front cannot be per. 
 mitted to continue, and the remedy to be applied should be complete and 
 thorough, leaving nothing to be done or undone, at enormously increased 
 expense, half a generation hence. Toroi4to, we believe, will quickly "grow 
 up " to the proposed improvement, great as the undertaking may now 
 seem — the improvement itself tending to make the cost less burdensome 
 from year to year. 
 
 Respectfully submitted. 
 
 C. S. GzowsKi. 
 
 W. Shanly. 
 
1 
 
 n 
 
 f»rH- 
 
 S 
 I 
 
 I 
 
-i!^- 
 
 II |l » II ' 
 
 Esplanade 
 
 *i #*■'■* ■'■--' :::? 
 
 •k"^ '^ ««■«-■ 
 
 PRONT Elkvation S 
 
 H E Wl NC 
 
 
 Section at Street Openinc 
 
 7^ z/^-^- /^ 
 
 ■HK 
 
iNADE Viaduct 
 
 '■»•"•■ 'TJrrfrrrj jt 
 
 ON Shewinc Strset Opcnin 
 
 a 
 
 Section tmroucm Embankment. 
 
 THE (?OPP. (?l1RiC eO. triD, TOfJOMC