POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY POST-PRAiNDIAL Philosophy By GRANT ALLEN author of "the evolutionist at large," etc. LONDON: CHATTO &: WINDUS 1894 PR4004 143234 i PREFACE These Essays appeared originally in The West- minster Gazette, and have only been so far modi- fied here as is necessary for purposes of volume publication. They aim at being suggestive rather than exhaustive: I shall be satisfied if I have provoked thought without following out each train to a logical conclusion. Most of the Essays are just what they pretend to be— crystallisations into writing of ideas suggested in familiar conver- sation. G. A. Hind Head, March 1894. J CONTENTS I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES IN THE MATTER OF ARISTOCRACY SCIENCE IN EDUCATION THE THEORY OF SCAPEGOATS AMERICAN DUCHESSES . IS ENGLAND PLAYED OUT ? . THE GAME AND THE RULES THE ROLE OF PROPHET THE ROMANCE OF THE CLASH OF RACES the monopolist instincts "mere amateurs" a squalid village concerning zeitgeist THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE EYE versus ear . THE POLITICAL PUPA ON THlii CASINO TERRACE THE CELTIC FRINGE . PAGE I 9 i8 27 35 44 53 61 70 79 87 95 104 ri2 122 130 138 147 Vlll CONTENTS. XIX. IMAGINATION AND RADICALS XX. ABOUT ABROAD . XXI. WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL XXII. ANENT ART PRODUCTION XXIII. A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA XXIV. OP SECOND CHAMBKRS XXV. A POINT OF CRITICISM PAGE 165 182 199 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY I. THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES. A DISTINGUISHED Positivist friend of mine, who is in most matters a practical man of the world, astonished me greatly the other day at Venice, by the grave remark that Italian was destined to be the language of the future. I found on inquiry he had inherited the notion direct from Auguste Comte, who justified it on the purely sentimental and unpractical ground that the tongue of Dante had never yet been associated with any great national defeat or disgrace. The idea surprised me not a little ; because it displays such a profound misconception of what language is, and why people use it. The speech of the world will not be decided on mere grounds of 4 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. sentiment: the tongue that survives will not sur- vive because it is so admirably adapted for the manufacture of rhymes or epigrams. Stern need compels. Frenchmen and Germans, in congress assembled, and looking about them for a means of intercommunication, might indeed agree to accept Italian then and there as an international compromise. But congresses don't make or un- make the habits of everyday life ; and the growth or spread of a language is a thing as much beyond our deliberate human control as the rise or fall of the barometer. My friend's remark, however, set me thinking and watching what are really the languages now gaining and spreading over the civilised world ; it set me speculating what will be the outcome of this gain and spread in another half century. And the results are these : Vastly the most grow- ing and absorbing of all languages at the present moment is the English, which is almost everywhere swallowing up the overflow of German, Scandi- navian, Dutch, and Russian. Next to it, probably, in point of vitality, comes Spanish, which is swallowing up the overflow of French, Italian, and the other Latin races. Third, perhaps, ranks STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES. 3 Russian, destined to become in time the spoken tongue of a vast tract in Northern and Central Asia. Among non-European languages, three seem to be gaining fast : Chinese, Malay, Arabic. Of the doomed tongues, on the other hand, the most hopeless is French, which is losing all round ; while Italian, German, and Dutch are either quite at a standstill or slightly retrograding. The world is now round. By the middle of the twentieth century, in all probability, English will be its dominant speech ; and the English-speak- ing peoples, a heterogeneous conglomerate of all nationalities, will control between them the des- tinies of mankind. Spanish will be the language of half the populous southern hemisphere. Rus- sian will spread over a moiety of Asia. Chinese, Malay, Arabic, will divide among themselves the less civilised parts of Africa and the East. But French, German, and Italian will be insignificant and dwindling European dialects, as numerically unimportant as Flemish or Danish in our own day. And why ? Not because Shakespeare wrote in English, but because the English language has already got a firm hold of all those portions 4 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. of the earth's surface which are most absorbing the overflow of European populations. Germans and Scandinavians and Russians emigrate by the thousand now to all parts of the United States and the north-west of Canada. In the first generation they may still retain their ancestral speech ; but their children have v-U to learn English. In Australia and New Zealand the same thing is happening. In South Africa Dutch had got a footing, it is true ; but it is fast losing it. The newcomers learn English, and though the elder Boers stick with Boer conservatism to their native tongue, young Piet and young Paul find it pays them better to know and speak the language of commerce — the language of Cape Town, of Kimberley, of the future. The reason is the same throughout. Whenever two tongues come to be spoken in the same area one of them is sure to be more useful in business than the other. Every French-Canadian who wishes to do things on a large scale is obliged to speak English. So is the Creole in Louisiana ; so earlier were the Knickerbocker Dutch in New York. Once let Eng- lish get in, and it beats all competing languages fairly out of the field in a couple of generations. STRUGGLE FOR LIFE AMONG LANGUAGES. 5 Like influences favour Spanish in South America and elsewhere. English has annexed most of North America, Australia, South Africa, the Pacific; Spanish has annexed South America, Central America, the Philippines, Cuba, and a few other places. For the most part these areas are less suited than the English-speaking districts for colonisation by North Europeans ; but they absorb a large number of Italians and other Mediterranean races, who all learn Spanish in the second generation. As to the other domi- nant languages, the points in their favour are different. Conquest and administrative needs are spreading Russian over the steppes of Asia; the Arab merchant and the growth of Mahomme- danism are importing Arabic far into the heart of Africa; the Chinaman is carrying his own monosvllables with him to California, Australia, Singapore. These tongues in future will divide the world between them. The German who leaves Germany becomes an Anglo-American. The Italian who leaves Italy becomes a Spanish-American. There is another and still more striking way of looking at the rapid increase of English. No 6 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. other language will carry you through so many ports in the world. It suflSces for London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Belfast, Southampton, Cardiff; for New York, Boston, Montreal, Charleston, New Orleans, San Francisco ; for Sydney, Melbourne, Auckland, Hong Kong, Yokohama, Honolulu ; for Calcutta, Bombay, Madras, Kurrachi, Singapore, Colombo, Cape Town, Mauritius. Spanish with Cadiz, Barcelona, Havana, Callao, Valparaiso, cannot touch that record ; nor can French with Marseilles, Bordeaux, Havre, Algiers, Antwerp, Tahiti. The most commercially useful language in the world, thus widely diffused in so many great mercantile and shipping centres, is certain to win in the struggle for existence among the tongues of the future. The old Mediterranean civilisation teaches us a useful lesson in this respect. Two languages dominated the Mediterranean basin. The East spoke Greek, not because Plato and -/ army and navy against other lighters ! M// right to annex unoccupied territory over the equal right of all other people ! M// power to oppress all weaker nationalities, all inferior races ! " It 7iever means anything good. For if a cause is just, like Ireland's, or once Italy's, then 'tis the good man's duty to espouse it with warmth, be it his own or another's. And if a cause be bad, then 'tis the good man's duty to oppose it tooth and nail, irrespective of your " Patriotism." True, a good man will feel more sensitively anxious that justice should be done by the particular State of which he happens himself to be a member than by any other, because he is partly responsible for the corporate action; but then, people who feel deeply this joint moral responsibility of all the citizens are not praised as patriots but reviled as unpatriotic. To urge that our own country should strive with all its might to be better, higher, purer, nobler, juster than other countries around it — the only kind of Patriotism worth a brass farthing in a righteous man's eyes — is accounted by most men both wicked and foolish. Patriotism, then, is the collective or national Sa POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. form of the Monopolist Instincts. And like all those Instincts, it is a relic of savagery, which the Man of the Future is now engaged in out- living. Property is the next form. That, on the very face of it, is a viler and more sordid one. For Patriotism at least can lay claim to some expansiveness beyond mere individual interest ; whereas property stops dead short at the nar- rowest limits. It is not " Us against the world ! " but " Me against my fellow-citizens ! " It is the final result of the industrial war in its most hideous avatar. Look how it scars the fair face of our England with its anti-social notice-boards, " Trespassers will be prosecuted ! " It says, in effect, "This is my land. God made it; but I have acquired it and tabooed it. The grass on it grows green ; but only for me. The mountains rise beautiful ; no foot of man, save mine and my gamekeepers', shall tread them. The waterfalls gleam fresh and cool in the glen : avaunt there, you non-possessors ; 2/ou shall never see them ! All this is my own. And I choose to monopolise it." Or is it the capitalist ? "I will add field THE MONOPOLIST INSTINCTS. 83 to field," he says, in despite of his own scrip- ture ; "I will join railway to railway. I will juggle into my own hands all the instru- ments for the production of wealth that 1 can lay hold of; and T will use them for myself against the producer and the consumer. I will enrich myself by ' corners ' on the necessaries of life; I will make food dear for the poor, that I myself may roll in needless luxury. I will monopolise whatever I can seize, and the people may eat straw." That temper, too, humanity must outlive. And those who can't outlive it of themselves, or be warned in time, must be taught by stern lessons that their race has outstripped them. As for slavery, 'tis now gone. That was the vilest of them all. It was the naked assertion of the Monopolist platform : " You live, not for yourself, but wholly and solely for me. I dis- regard your life entirely, and use you as my chattel." It died at last of the moral indigna- tion of humanity. It died when a Southern court of so-called justice formulated in plain words the underlying principle of its hateful creed: "A black man has no rights which a white man is 84 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. bound to respect." That finally iinished it. We no longer allow every man to " wallop his own nigger." And though the last relics of it die hard in Queensland, South Africa, Demerara, we have at least the satisfaction of knowing that one Monopolist Instinct out of the group is pretty well bred out of us. Except as regards women ! There, it lingers still. The Man says even now to himself : — " This woman is mine. If she ventures to have a heart or a will of her own, woe betide her ! I have tabooed her for life ; let any other man touch her, let her look at any other man — and — knife, revolver, or law court, they shall both of them answer for it ! " There you have in all its natural ugliness another Monopolist Instinct — the deepest-seated of all, the vilest, the most barbaric. She is not yours : she is her own : unhand her ! The Turk takes his offending slave, sews her up in a sack, and flings her into the Bosphorus. The Christian Englishman drags her shame before an open court, and divorces her with contumely. Her shame, I say, in the common phrase, because though to me it is no shame that any human being should follow the THE MONOPOLIST TNSTINCTS. 85 dictates of his or her own heart, it is a shame to the woman in the eyes of the world, and a life of disgrace she must live thenceforward. All this is Monopoly and essentially slavery. As man lives down the Ape and Tiger stage, he will learn to say, rather : " Be mine while you can ; but the day you cease to feel you can be mine willingly, don't disgrace your own body by yielding it up where your soul feels loathing; don't consent to be the mother of children by a father you despise or dislike or are tired of. Let us kiss and part. Go where you will; and my good will go with you!" Till the man can say that with a sincere heart, why, to borrow a phrase from George Meredith, he may have passed Seraglio Point, but he hasn't rounded Cape Turk yet. You find that a hard saying, do you ? You kick against freedom for wife or daughter ? Well, yes, no doubt ; you are still a Monopolist. But, believe me, the earnest and solemn expression of a profound belief never yet did harm to any one. I look forward to the time when women shall be as free in every way as men, not by levelling down, but by levelling up ; not, as 86 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. some would have us think, by enslaving the men, but by elevating, emancipating, unshackling the women. There is a charming little ditty in Louis Stevenson's "Child's Garden of Verse," which always seems to me to sum up admirably the Monopolist attitude. Here it is. Look well at it : — " When I am grown to man's estate I shall be very proud and great, And tell the other girls and boys, Not to meddle with my toys." That is the way of the Monopolist. It catches him in the very act. He says to all the world : " Hands off ! My property ! Don't walk on my grass! Don't trespass in my park! Beware of my gunboats ! No trifling with my women ! I am the king of the castle. You meddle with me at your peril." " Ours ! " not " Mine ! " is the watchword of the future. XT. ''MERE AMATEURS." " He was a mere amateur ; but still, he did some sood work in science." Increasingly of late years I have heard these condescending words uttered, in the fatherland of Bacon, of Newton, of Darwin, when some Bates or Spottiswoode has been gathered to his fathers. It was not so once. Time was when all English science was the work of amateurs — and very well indeed the amateurs did it. I don't think anybody who does me the honour to cognise my humble individuality at all will ever be likely to mistake me for a laudator temporis acti. On the contrary, so far as I can see, the past seems generally to have been such a distinct failure all along the line that the one lesson we have to learn from it is, to go and do other- wise. I am one on that point with Shelley and Eousseau. But it does not follow, because 87 J-".-. j"^—. 88 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. most old things are bad, that all new things, and rising things are necessarily and indisput- ably in their own nature excellent. Novelties, too, may be retrograde. And even our great- grandfathers occasionally blundered upon some- thing cood in which we should do well to imitate them. The amateurishness of old English science was one of these good things now in course of abolition by the fashionable process of Germanisation. Don't imagine it was only for France that 1870 was fatal. The sad successes of that deadly year sent a wave of triumphant Teutonism over the face of Europe. I suppose it is natural to man to worship success; but ever since 1870 it is certainly the fact that if you wish to gain respect and consideration for any proposed change of system you must say, " They do it so in Germany." In education and science this is especially the case. Pedants always admire pedants. And Germany having shown herself to be easily first of European States in her pedant-manu- facturing machinery, all the assembled dominies of all the rest of the world exclaimed with one 'MERE amateurs:' 89 voice, " Go to ! Let us Germanise our educa- tional system ! " Now, the German is an excellent workman in his way. Patient, laborious, conscientious, he has all the highest qualities of the ideal brick-maker. He produces the best bricks, and you can gene- rally depend upon him to turn out both honest and workmanlike articles. But he is not an architect. For the architectonic faculty in its highest developments you must come to Eng- land. And he is not a teaclier or expounder. For the expository faculty in its purest form, the faculty that enables men to flash forth clearly and distinctly before the eyes of others the facts and principles they know and perceive themselves, you must go to France. Oh, dear, yes ; we may well be proud of England, llemem- ber, I have already disclaimed more than once in these papers the vulgar error of patriotism. But freedom from that narrow vice does not imply inability to recognise the good qualities of one's own race as well as the bad ones. And the Englishman, left to himself and his own native methods, used to cut a very respectable figure indeed in the domain of science. No other nation 90 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. has produced a Newton or a Darwin. The Englishman's way was to get up an interest in a subject first; and then, working back from the part of it that specially appealed to his own tastes, to make himself master of the entire field of inquiry. This natural and thoroughly indi- vidualistic English method enabled him to arrive at new results in a way impossible to the pedantically educated German — nay, even to the lucidly and systematically educated Frenchman. It was the plan to develop "mere amateurs," I admit; but it was also the plan to develop discoverers and revolutionisers of science. For the man most likely to advance knowledge is not the man who knows in an encyclopaedic rote-work fashion the whole circle of the sciences, but the man who takes a fresh interest for its own sake in some particular branch of inquiry. Darwin was a "mere amateur." He worked at things for the love of them. So were Mur- chison, Lyell, Benjamin Franklin, Herschel. So were or are Bates, Herbert Spencer, Alfred Russel Wallace. "Mere amateurs!" every man of them. ''MERE AMATEURS." 9I In an evil hour, however, our pastors and masters in conclave assembled said to one an- other, " Come now, let us Teutonise English scientific education." And straightway they Teu- tonised it. And there began to arise in England a new brood of patent machine-mude scientists — excellent men in their way, authorities on the Arachnida, knowing all about everything that could be taught in the schools, but lacking somehow the supreme grace of the old English originality. They are first-rate specialists, T allow; and I don't deny that a civilised country has all need of specialists. Nay, I even admit that the day of the specialist has only just begun. He will yet go far; he will impose himself and his yoke upon us. But don't let us therefore make the grand mistake of con- cluding that our fine old English birthright in science — the birthright that gave us our Newtons, our Cavendishes, our Darwins, our Lyells — was all folly and error. Don't let us spoil ourselves in order to become mere second-hand Germans. Let us recognise the fact that each nation has a work of its own to do in the world; and that as star from star, so one nation differeth 92 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. from another in glory. Let each of us thank the goodness and the grace that on his birth have smiled, that he was born of Englisli breed, and not a German child. "Don't you think," a military gentleman once said to me, "the Germans are wonderful organ- isers ? " " No," I answered, " I don't ; but I think they're excellent drill-sergeants." There are people who drop German authori- ties upon you as if a Teutonic name were guarantee enough for anything. They say, " Haus- berger asserts," or "According to Schimmelpen- ninck." This is pure fetichism. Believe me, your man of science isn't necessarily any the better because he comes to you with the label, "Made in Germany." The German instinct is the instinct of Frederick William of Prussia — the instinct of drilling. Very thorough and eflficient men in their way it turns out; men versed in all the lore of their chosen subject. If they are also men of transcendent ability (as often happens), they can give us a com- prehensive view of their own chosen field such as few Englishmen (except Sir Archibald Geikie, ''MERE AMATEURS." 93 and he's a Scot) cau equal. If 1 wanted to select a learned man for a special Government post — British Museum, and so forth — I dare say I should often be compelled to admit, as Government often admits, that the best man then and there obtainable is the German. But if I wanted to train Herbert Spencers and Faradays, I would certainly 7iot send them to Bonn or to Berlin. John Stuart Mill was an English Scotchman, educated and stuffed by his able father on the German system ; and how much of spontaneity, of vividness, of verve, we all of us feel John Stuart Mill lost by it ! One often wonders to what great, to what still greater, things that lofty brain iight not hav(i attained, if only James Mill would have given it a chance to develop itself naturally ! Our English gift is originality. Our English keynote is individuality. Let us cling to those precious heirlooms of our Celtic ancestry, and refuse to be Teutonised. Let us discard the lessons of the Potsdam grenadiers. Let us write on the pediment of our educational temple, "No German need apply." Let us disclaim that silly 94 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. phrase "A mere amateur." Let us return to the simple iaith iu direct observation that made English science supreme in Europe. And may the Lord gi'e us Britons a guid conceit o' oorsel's ! XII. A SQUALID VILLAGE. Strange that the wealthiest class in the wealthiest country in the world should so long have been content to inhabit a squalid village ! I'm not going to compare London, as English- men often do, with Paris or Vienna. I won't do two great towns that gross injustice. And, indeed, comparison here is quite out of the question. You don't compare Oxford with Little Peddlington, or Edinburgh with Thrums, and then ask which is the handsomest. Things must be alike in kind before you can begin to com- pare them. And London and Paris are not alike in kind. One is a city, and a noble city; the other is a village, and a squalid village. No; I will not even take a humbler standard of comparison, and look at London side by side with Brussels, Antwerp, Munich, Turin. Each of those is a city, and a fine city in its way; 95 96 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. but each of them is small. Still, even by their side, London is again but a squalid village. 1 insist upon that point, because, misled by their ancient familiarity with London, most English- men have had their senses and understandings so blunted on this issue, that they really don't know what is meant by a town, or a fine town, when they see one. And don't suppose it's because London is in Britain and these other towns out of it that I make these remarks : for Bath is a tine town, Edinburgh is a line town, even Glasgow and Newcastle are towns, while London is still a straggling, sprawling, inverte- brate, inchoate, overgrown village. I am as free, I hope, from anti-patriotic as from patriotic prejudice. The High Street in Oxford, Milsom Street in Bath, Princes Street in Edinburgh, those are all fine streets that would attract attention even in France or Germany. i)ut the Strand, Piccadilly, Ptcgent Street, Oxford Street — good Lord, deliver us ! One more caveat as to my meaning. When I cite among real towns Brussels, Antwerp, and Munich, I am not thinking of the treasures of art those beautiful places contain ; that is another A SQUALID VILLAGE. 97 and altogether higher question. Towns supreme in this respect often lag far behind others of less importance — lag behind in those external features and that general architectural effective- ness which rightly entitle us to say in a broad sense, "This is a fhie city." Florence, for example, contains more treasures of art in a small space than any other town of Europe; yet Florence, though undoubtedly a town, and even a fine town, is not to bo compared in this respect, I do not say with Venice or Brussels, but even with Munich or Milan. On the other hand, London contains far more treasures of art in its way than Boston, Massachusetts; but Boston is a handsome, well-built, regular town, while London — well, I will spare you the further repetition of the trite truism that London is a squalid village. In one word, the point I am seeking to bring out here is that a town, as a town, is handsome or otherwise, not in virtue of the works of art or antiquity it contains, but in virtue of its ground-nlau, its architecture, its external and visible decorations and places — the Louvre, the Boulevards, the Champs Elysdes, the Place de I'Opera. 98 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. Now London has no ground-plan. It has no street architecture. It has no decorations, though it has many uglifications. It is frankly and simply and ostentatiously hideous. And being wholly wanting in a system of any sort — in organic parts, in idea, in views, in vistas — it is only a village, and a painfully uninteresting one. Most Englishmen see London before they see any other great town. They become so familiar- ised with it that their sense of comparison is dulled and blunted. I had the good fortune to have seen many other great towns before I ever saw London : and I shall never forget my first sense of surprise at its unmitigated ugliness. Get on top of an omnibus — I don't say in Paris, from the Palais lioyal to the A^^c de Triomphe, but in lirussels, from the Gare du Nord to the Palais de Justice — and what do you see ? From end to end one unbroken suc- cession of noble and open prospects. I'm not thinking now of the Grande Place in the old town, with its magnificent collection of mediaaval buildings ; the Great Fire effectively deprived us of our one sole chance of such an element of beauty in modern London. I confine myself on A SQUALID VILLAGE. 99 purpose to the parts of Brussels which are purely recent, and might have been imitated at a dis- tance in London, if there had been any public spirit or any public body in England to imitate them. (But unhappily there was neither.) lie- call to mind as you read tlie strikingly hand- some street view that greets you as you emerge from the Northern Station down the great central Boulevards to the Gare du Midi — all built within our own memory. Then think of the prospects that gradually unfold themselves as you rise on the hill ; the line vista north towards Sainte Marie de Schaarbeck ; the beautiful Eue Royale, bounded by that charming Pare; the uner|ualled stretch of the Paie de la Eegence, starting from the Place Eoyale with Godfrey of Bouillon, and ending with the imposing mass of the Palais de Justice. It is to me a matter for mingled sur- prise and humiliation tliat so many Englishmen can look year after year at that glorious street — perhaps the finest in the world — and yet never think to themselves, " Mightn't we faintly imitate some small part of this in our wealtliy, ugly, un- compromising London ? " I always say to Americans who come to 100 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. Europe : " When you go to England, don't see our towns, but see our country. Our country is some- thing unequalled in the world : while our towns ! — well, anyway, keep away from London ! " With the solitary and not very brilliant excep- tion of the Embankment, there isn't a street in London where one could take a stranger to admire the architecture. Compare that record with the new Boulevards in Antwerp, where almost every house is worth serious study : or with the Eing at Cologne (to keep close home all the time), where one can see whole rows of German Re- naissance houses of extraordinary interest. What street in London can be mentioned in this re- spect side by side with Commonwealth Avenue or Beacon Street in Boston ; with Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio ; with the upper end of Fifth Avenue, New York; nay, even with the new Via Roma at Genoa ? Why is it that we English can't get on the King's Road at Brighton any- thing faintly approaching that splendid sea front on the Digue at Ostend, or those coquettish white villas that line the Promenade des Anglais at Nice ? The blight of London seems to lie over all Southern England. A SQUALID VILLAGE. loi Paris looks like the capital of a world-wide empire. Londou looks like a shapeless neglected suburb, allowed to grow up by accident anyhow. And that's just the plain truth of it. 'Tis a for- tuitous concourse of hap-hazard houses. " But we are improving somewhat. The County Council is opening out a few new thoroughfares piecemepl." Oh yes, in an illogical, unsystematic, English patchwork fashion, we are driving a badly- designed, unimpressive new street or two, with no expansive sense of imperial greatness, through the hopelessly congested and most squalid quarters. But that is all. No grand, systematic, recon- structive plan, no rising to the height of the occasion and the Empire ! You tinker away at a Shaftesbury Avenue. Parochial, all of it. And there you get the real secret of our futile attempts at making a town out of our squalid village. The fault lies all at the door of the old Corporation, and of the people who made and still make the old Corporation possible. For centuries, indeed, there was really no London, not even a village; there was only a scratch collection of contiguous villages. The consequence was that here, at the centre of national life, the English people grew 102 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. wholly unaccustomed to the bare idea of a town, and managed everything piecemeal, on the petty scale of a country vestry. The vestryman in- telligence has now overrun the land ; and if the London County Council ever succeeds at last in making the congeries of villages into — I do not say a city, for that is almost past praying for, but something analogous to a second-rate Con- tinental town, it will only be after long lapse of time and violent struggles with the vestry- man level of intellect and feeling. London had many great disadvantages to start with. She lay in a dull and marshy bottom, with no building stone at hand, and therefore she was forecondenined by her very position to the curse of brick and stucco, when Bath, Oxford, Edinburgh, were all built out of their own quarries. Then fire destroyed all her mediaeval architecture, leaving her only Westminster Abbey to suggest the greatness of her losses. But brick-earth and fire have been as nothing in their way by the side of the evil wrought by Gog and Magog. When five hundred trembling ghosts of naked Lord Mayors have to answer for their follies and their sins hereafter, I con- A SQUALID VILLAGE. 103 fidently expect the first question in the appalling indictment will be, " Why did you allow the richest nation on earth to house its metropolis in a squalid village ? " "We have a Molocli in England to whom we sacrifice much. And his hateful name is Vested Interest. XIII. CONCERNING ZEITGEIST. A CERTAIN story is told about Mr. Ruskin, no doubt apocryphal, but at any rate characteristic. A young lady, fresh from the Abyss of Bays- water, met the sage one evening at dinner a gushing young lady, as many such there be— who, aglow with joy, boarded the Professor at once with her private art-experiences. "Oh, Mr. Ruskin," she cried, clasping her hands, "do you know, I hadn't been two days in Florence before I discovered what you meant when you spoke about the supreme imapproachableness of Botti- celli." "Indeed?" Buskin answered. "Well, that's very remarkable; for it took me, myself, half a lifetime to discover it." The answer, of course, was meant to be crush- ing. How should she, a brand plucked from the burning of Bayswater, be able all at once, on the very first blush, to appreciate Botticelli? CONCERNING ZEITGEIST. 105 Aud it took the greatest critic of his age half a lifetime! Yet I venture to maintain, for all that, that the young lady was right, and that the critic was wrong — if such a thing be conceivable. I know, of course, that when we speak of Ruskin we must walk delicately, like Agag. But still, I repeat it, the young lady was riglit ; and it was largely the unconscious, pervasive action of Mr. Ruskin's own personality that enabled her to be so. It's all the Zeitgeist : that's where it is. The slow irresistible Zeitgeist. Fifty years ago, men's taste had been so warped and distorted by current art and current criticism that they couldn't see Botticelli, however hard they tried at it. He was a sealed book to our fathers. In those days it required a brave, a vigorous, and an original thinker to discover any merit in any painter before Eaffael, except perhaps, as Goldsmith wisely remarked, Perugino. The man who went then to the Uffizi or the Pitti, after admiring as in duty bound his High Renaissance masters, found himself suddenly confronted with the Judith or the Calumny, and straightway wondered what manner of strange wild beasts these were that io6 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. some insane early Tuscan had once painted to amuse himself in a lucid interval. They were not in the least like the Correggios and the Guidos, the Lawrences and the Opies, that the men of that time had formed their taste upon, and accepted as their sole artistic standards. To people brought up upon pure David and Thorvaldsen, the Primavera at the Belle Arti must naturally have seemed like a wild freak of madness. The Zeitgeist then went all in the direction of cold lifeless correctness ; the idea that the painter's soul counted for something in art was an undreamt of heresy. On your way back from Paris some day, stop a night at Amiens and take the Cathedral seriously. Half the stately interior of that glorious thirteenth century pile is encrusted and overlaid by hideous gewgaw monstrosities of the flashiest Bernini and baroque period. Tliere they sprawl their obtru- sive legs and wave their flaunting theatrical wings to the utter destruction of all repose and con- sistency in one of the noblest and most perfect buildings of Europe. Nowadays, any child, any workman can see at a glance how ugly and how disfiguring those floppy creatures are; it is CONCERNING ZEITGEIST. 107 impossible to look at tliem without saying to oneself: "Why don't they clear away all this high-faluting rubbish, and let us see the real columns and arches and piers as their makers designed them?" Yet who was it that put them there, those unspeakable angels in muslin drapery, those fly-away nymphs and graces and seraphim? Why, the best and most skilled artists of their day in Europe. And whence comes it that the merest child can now see in- stinctively how out of place they are, how dis- figuring, how incongruous? Why, because the Gothic revival has taught us all by degrees to appreciate the beauty and delicacy of a style which to our eighteenth century ancestors was mere barbaric medisevalism ; has taught us to admire its exquisite purity, and to dislike the obstrusive introduction into its midst of incon- gruous and meretricious Bernini-like tlimsiness. The Zeitgeist has changed, and we have changed with it. It is just the same with our friend Botticelli. Scarce a dozen years ago, it was almost an affecta- tion to pretend you admired him. It is no affec- tation now. Hundreds of assorted young women io8 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. from the Abyss of Bayswater may rise auy morn- ing here in sacred Florence and stand genuinely enchanted before the Adoration of the Kings, or the Venus who floats on her floating shell in a Botticellian ocean. And why ? Because Leigh- ton, Holman Hunt, Rossetti, Burne-Jones, Madox Brown, Strudwick, have led them slowly up to it by golden steps innumerable. Thirty years ago the art of the early Tuscan painters was some- thing to us Northerners exotic, strange, uncon- nected, archaeological. Gradually, it has been brought nearer and nearer to us on the walls of the Grosvenor and the New Gallery, till now he that runs may read ; the ingenuous maiden, fished from the Abyss of Bayswater, can drink in at a glance what it took a liuskin many years of his life and much slow development to attain to piecemeal. That is just what all great men are for — to make the world accept as a truism in the genera- tion after them what it rejected as a paradox in the generation before them. Not, of course, that there isn't a little of affec- tation, and still more of fashion, to the very end in all of it. An immense number of people, CONCERNING ZEITGEIST. log incapable of genuinely admiring anything for its own sake at all, are anxious only to he told what they "ought to admire, don't you know," and will straightway proceed as conscientiously as they can to get up an admiration for it. A friend of mine told me a beautiful example. Two aspiring young women, of the limp-limbed, short-haired, resthetic species, were standing rapt before the circular Madonna at the Uffizi. They had gazed at it long and lovingly, seeing it bore on its frame the magic name of Botticelli. Of a sudden one of the pair happened to look a little nearer at the accusing label. " Why, this is not Sandro," she cried, with a revulsion of disgust; "this is only Aless." And straightway they went off from the spot in high dudgeon at having been misled as they supposed into examining the work of "another person of the same name." Need I point the moral of my apologue, in this age of enlightenment, by explaining, for the benefit of the junior members, that the gentle- man's full name was really Alessandro, and that both abbreviations are impartially intended to cover his one and indivisible personality? The no POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. first half is official, like Alex. ; the second affec- tionate and familiar, like Sandy. StiU, even after making due allowance for such humbugs as these, a vast residuum remains of people who, if born sixty years ago, could never by any ])ossibility have been made to see there was anything admirable in Lippi, Botticelli, Giotto ; but who, having; been born thirty years ago, see it without an effort. Hundreds who read these lines must themselves remember the un- mistakable thrill of genuine pleasure with which they first gazed upon the Fra Angelicos at San Marco, the Memlings at Bruges, the Giottos in the Madonna dell' Arena at Padua. To many of us, those are real epochs in our inner life. To the men of fifty years ago, the bare avowal itself would have seemed little short of affected silliness. Is the change all due to the teaching of the teachers and the preaching of the preachers ? I think not entirely. For, after all, the teachers and the preachers are but a little ahead of the age they live in. They see things earlier ; they help to lead us up to them ; but they do not wholly produce the revolutions they inaugu- CONCERNING ZEITGEIST. in rate. Ilumanity as a whole develops consistently along certain pre-established and predestined lines. Sooner or later, a certain point must inevitably be reached ; but some of us reach it sooner, and most of us later. That's all the difference. Every great change is mainly due to the fact that we have all already attained a certain point in development. A step in advance becomes in- evitable after that, and one after another we are sure to take it. In one word, what it needed a man of genius to see dimly thirty years ago, it needs a singular fool not to see clearly nowa- days. XIV. THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. Men don't marry nowadays. So everybody tells us. And I suppose we may therefore conclude, by a simple act of inference, that women in turn don't marry either. It takes two, of course, to make a quarrel — or a marriage. Why is this ? " Young people nowadays want to begin where neir fathers left off." "Men are made so comfortable at present in their clubs." " College-bred girls have no taste for housekeeping." "Eents are so hi-U and manners so luxurious." Good heavens, what silly trash, what puerile nonsense! Are we all little boys and girls, I ask you, that wo are to put one another off with such transparent humbug? Here we have to deal with a primitive instinct — the profoundest and deepest-seated instinct of humanity, save only the instincts of food and drink and of self-preservation. Man, like all 113 THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. 113 other animals, has two main functions: to feed his own organism, and to reproduce his species. Ancestral habit leads him, when mature, to choose himself a mate— because he loves her. It drives him, it urges him, it goads him irresistibly. If this profound impulse is really lacking to-day in any large part of our race, there must be some correspondingly profound and adequate reason for It. Don't let us deceive ourselves with shal- low platitudes which may do for drawing-rooms. This is philosophy, even though post-prandial. Let us try to take a philosophic view of the question at issue, from the point of vantage of a biological outlook. Before you begin to investigate the causes of a phenomenon qmlconque, 'tis well to decide whether the phenomenon itself is there to investigate. Taking society throughout— 710^^ in the sense of those " forty families " to which the term is restricted by Lady Charles Beresford— I doubt whether marriage is much out of fashion. Statis- tics show a certain decrease, it is true, but not an alarming one. Among the labouring classes, I imagine men, and also women, still wed pretty frequently. When people say, « Young men won't H 114 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. marry nowadays," they mean young men in a particular stratum of society, roughly bounded by a silk hat on Sundays. Now, when you and I were young (I take it for granted that you and I are approaching the fifties) young men did marry ; even within this restricted area, 'twas their wholesome wav in life to form an attach- ment early with some nice girl in their own set, and to start at least with the idea of marrying her. Toward that goal they worked ; for that end they endured and sacrificed many things. True, even then, the long engagement was the rule; but the long engagement itself meant some persistent impulse, some strong impetus marriage- wards. The desire of the man to make this woman his own, the longing to make t'lis woman happy — normal and healthy endowments of our race — had still much driving-power. Nowadays, I seriously think I observe in most young men of the middle class around me a distinct and disastrous weakening of the impulse. They don't fall in love as frankly, as honestly, as irretriev- ably as they used to do. They shilly-shally, they pick and choose, they discuss, they criti- cise. They say themselves these futile foolish THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. 115 things about the club, and the flat, and the cost of living. They believe in Malthus. Fancy a young man who believes in Malthus ! They seem in no hurry at all to get married. But thirty or forty years ago, young men used to rush by blind instinct into the toils of matrimony— because they couldn't help themselves. Such Laodicean lukj- warmness betokens in the class wliich exhibits it a weakening of impulse. That weakening of im- pulse is really the thing we have to account for. Yoxmg men of a certain type don't marry, because— they are less of young men than formerly. Wild animals in confinement seldom propa- gate their kind. Only a few caged birds will continue their species. Whatever upsets the balance of the organism in an individual or a race tends first of all to affect the rate of re- production. Civilise the red man, and he begins to decrease at once in numbers. Turn the >Sandwich Islands into a trading community, and the native Hawaiian refuses forthwith to give hostages to fortune. Tahiti is dwindling. From the moment the Tasmanians were taken to Nor- folk Island, not a single Tasmanian baby was ii6 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. born. The Jesuits made a model community of Paraguay ; but they altered the habits of the Paraguayans so fast that the reverend iathers, who were, of course, themselves celibates, were compelled to take strenuous and even grotesque measures to prevent the complete and immediate extinction of their converts. Other cases in abun- dance I might quote an I would ; but I limit myself to these. They suffice to exhibit the general principle involved ; any grave upset in the conditions of life affects first and at once the fertility of a species. " But colonists often increase with rapidity." Ay, marry, do they, where the conditions of life are easy. At the present day most colonists go to fairly civilised regions ; they are transported to their new home by steamboat and railway ; they find for the most part more abundant pro- vender and more wholesome surroundings than in their native country. There is no real upset. Better food and easier life, as Herbert Spencer has shown, result (other things equal) in increased fertility. His chapters on this subject in the " Principles of Biology " should be read by every- body who pretends to talk on questions of popu- THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. 117 lation. But in new and difficult colonies the in- crease is slight. Whatever compels greater wear and tear of the nervous system proves inimical to the reproductive function. The strain and stress of co-ordination with novel circumstances and novel relations affect most injuriously the organic balance. The African negro has Ion" been accustomed to agricultural toil and to certain simple arts in his own country. Transported to the West Indies and the United States, he found life no harder than of old, if not, indeed, easier. He had abundant food, protection, security, a kind of labour for which he was well adapted. In- stead of dying out, therefore, he was fruitful, and multiplied, and replenished the earth amaz- ingly. But the Eed Indian, caught blatant in the hunting stage, refused to be tamed, and could not swallow civilisation. He pined and dwined and decreased in his " reservations." The change was too great, too abrupt, too brusque for him. The papoose before long became an extinct animal. Is not the same thing true of the middle class of England ? Civilisation and its works have come too quickly upon us. The strain and stress of Il8 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. correlating and co-ordinating the world we live in are getting too much for us. Railways, tele- graphs, the penny post, the special edition, have played havoc at last with our nervous systems. We are always on the stretch, rushing and tear- ing perpetually. We bolt our breakfasts; we catch the train or 'bus by the skin of our teeth, to rattle us into the City ; we run down to Scotland or over to Paris on business; we lunch in London and dine in Glasgow, Bel- fast, or Calcutta. (Excuse imagination.) The tape clicks perpetually in our ears the last quota- tion in Eries ; the telephone rings us up at inconvenient moments. Something is always hap- pening somewhere to disturb our equanimity ; we tear open the Times with feverish haste, to learn that Kimberleys or Jabez Balfour have fallen, that Matabeleland has been painted red, that shares have gone up, or gone down, or evapo- rated. Life is one turmoil of excitement and bustle. Financially, 'tis a series of dissolving views ; personally 'tis a rush ; socially, 'tis a mosaic of deftly-fitted engagements. Drop out one piece, and you can never replace it. You are full next week from Monday to Saturday — THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. 119 business all day, what calls itself pleasure (save the mark !) all evening. Poor old Leisure is dead. We hurry and scurry and flurry eternally. One whirl of work from morning till night: then dress and dine : one whirl of excitement from night till morning. A snap of troubled sleep, and again da ca'po. Not an hour, not a minute, we can call our own. A wire from a patient ill abed in Warwickshire ! A wire from a client hard hit in Hansards ! Endless editors askinj; for more copy ! more copy ! Alter to suit your own particular trade, and 'tis the life of all of us. The first generation after Stephenson and the Eocket pulled through with it somehow. They inherited the sound constitutions of the men who sat on rustic seats in the gardens of the twenties. The second generation — that's you and me — felt the strain of it more severely : new machines had come in to make life still more complicated: sixpenny telegrams, Bell and Edison, submarine cables, evening papers, perturbations pouring in from all sides incessantly; the suburbs growing, the hubbub increasing, Metropolitan railways, ^«fcfl.r>*"jn«Mk»^'Kr'W,t»«^cr^yrj.VK- ^» I20 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. trams, bicycles, innumerable : but natheless we still endured, and presented the world all the same with a third generation. Tliat third generation — ah me ! there comes the pity of it ! One fancies the impulse to marry and rear a family has wholly died out of it. It seems to have died out most in the class where the strain and stress are greatest. I don't think young men of that class to-day have the same feelings towards women of their sort as formerly. Nobody, I trust, will mistake me for a reactionary : in most ways, the modern young man is a vast improve- ment on you and me at twenty-five. But I believe there is really among young men in towns less chivalry, less devotion, less romance than there used to be. That, I take it, is the true reason why young men don't marry. With certain classes and in certain places a primitive instinct of our race has weakened. They say this weakening is accompanied in towns by an increase in sundry hateful and degrading vices. I don't know if that is so ; but at least one would expect it. Any enfeeblement of the normal and natural instinct of virilitv would show itself i.tJ':at»>^*,«>>e*Mfc«n*i.--« THE DECLINE OF MARRIAGE. 121 first in morbid aberrations. On that I say nothing. I only say this— that I think the present crisis in the English marriage market IS due, not to clubs or the comfort of bachelor quarters, but to the cumulative effect of nervous over-excitement. XV. EYE VERSUS EAR. It is admitted on all hands by this time, I sup- pose, that the best way of learning is by eye, not by ear. Therefore the authorities that prescribe for us our education among all classes have de- cided that we shall learn by ear, not by eye. Which is just what one might expect from a vested interest. Of course this superiority of sight over hearing is pre-eminently true of natural science — that is to say, of nine-tenths among the subjects worth learning by humanity. The only real way to learn geology, for example, is not to mug it up in a printed text-book, but to go into the field with a geologist's hammer. The only real way to learn zoology and botany is not by reading a volume of natural history, but by collecting, dis- secting, observing, preserving, and comparing speci- mens. Therefore, of course, natural science has 122 -j^ iJ EYE VERSUS EAR. 123 never been a favourite study in the eyes of school- masters, who prefer those subjects which can be taught in a room to a row of boys on a bench, and who care a great deal less than nothing for any subject which isn't "good to examine in." Educational value and importance in after life have been sacrificed to the teacher's ease and convenience, or to the readiness with which the pupil's progress can be tested on paper. Not what is best to learn, but what is least trouble to teach in great squads to boys, forms the staple of our modern English education. They call it "education," I observe in the papers, and I suppose we must fall in with that whim of the profession. But even the subjects which belong by rights to the ear can nevertheless be taught by the eye more readily. Everybody knows how much easier it is to get up the history and geography of a country when you are actually in it than when you are merely reading about it. It lives and moves before you. The places, the persons, the monuments, the events, all become real to you. Each illustrates each, and each tends to impress the other on the memory. Sight burns them 124 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. into the brain without conscious effort. You can learn more of Egypt and of Egyptian history, culture, hieroglyphics, and language in a few short weeks at Luxor or Sakkarah than in a year at the Louvre and the British Museum. The Tombs of the Kings are worth many papyri. The mere sight of the temples and obelisks and monuments and inscriptions, in the places where their makers originally erected them, gives a sense of reality and interest to them all that no amount of study under alien conditions can possibly equal. We have all of us felt that the only place to observe Flemish art to the greatest advantage is at Ghent and Bruges and Brussels and Antwerp ; just as the only place to learn Florentine art as it really was is at the Uffizi and the Bargello. These things being so, the authorities who have charge of our public education, primary, secondary, and tertiary, hav3 decided in their wisdom — to do and compel tho exact contrary. Object-lessons and the visible being admittedly preferable to rote-lessons and the audible, they liave prescribed that our education, so called, shall be mainly an education not in things and properties, but in books and readiucf. Thev have settled that it EYE VERSUS EAR. 125 shall deal almost entirely and exclusively with language and with languages ; that words, not objects, shall be the facts it impresses on the minds of the pupils. In our primary schools they have insisted upon nothing but reading and writing, with just a smattering of arithmetic by way of science. In our secondary schools they have insisted upon nothing but Greek and Latin, with about an equal leaven of algebra and geo- metry. This mediaeval fare (I am delighted that 1 can thus agree for once with Professor Ray Lankester) they have thrust down the throats of all the world indiscriminately ; so much so that nowadays people seem hardly able at last to con- ceive of any other than a linguistic education as possible. You will hear many good folk who talk with contempt of Greek and Latin ; but when you come to inquire what new mental pabulum they would substitute for those quaint and grotesque survivals of the Dark Ages, you find what they want instead is — modern languages. The idea that language of any sort forms no necessary element in a liberal education has never even occurred to them. They take it for granted that when you leave off feeding boys on straw and 126 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. oats you must supply them instead with hay and sawdust. Not that I rage against Greek and Latin as such. It is well ve should have many specialists among us who understand them, just as it is well we should have specialists in Anglo-Saxon and San- skrit. I merely mean that they are not the sum and substance of educational method. They are at best but two languages of considerable import- ance to the student of purely human evolution. Furthermore, even these comparatively useless linguistic subjects could themselves be taught far better by sight than by hearing. A week at Eome would give your average boy a much clearer idea of the relations of the Capitol with the Palatine than all the pretty maps in Dr. Wiiliam Smith's Smaller Classical Dictionary. It would give him also a sense of the reality of the Latin language and the Latin literature, which he could never pick up out of a dog-eared Livy or a thumb-marked ^neid. You have only to look across from the top of the Janiculum, towards the white houses of Frascati, to learn a vast deal more about the Alban hills and the site of Tusculum than ever you could mug up from all the geo- EYE VERSUS EAR. 127 graphy books in the British Museum. The way to learn every subject on earth, even book-lore included, is not out of books alone, but by actual observation. And yet it is impossible for any one among us to do otherwise than acquiesce in this vicious circle. Why? Just because no man can dis- sociate himself outright from the social organism of which he forms a component member. He can no more do so than the eye can dissociate itself from the heart and lungs, or than the legs can shake themselves free from the head and stomach. We have all to learn, and to let our boys learn, what authority decides for us. We can't give them a better education than the aver- age, even if we know what it is and desire to impart it, because the better education, though abstractly more valuable, is now and here the inlet to nothing. Every door is barred with examinations, and opens but to the golden key of the crammer. Not what is of most real use and importance in life, but what "pays best" in examination, is the test of desirability. We are the victims of a system; and our only hope of redress is not by sporadic individual action but 128 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. by concerted rebellion. We must cry out against the abuse till at last we are heard by dint of our much speaking. In a world so complex and so highly organised as ours, the individual can only do anything in the long run by influencing the mass — by securing the co-operation of many among his fellows. Meanwhile, I believe it is gradually becoming the fact that our girls, who till lately were so very ill-taught, are beginning to know more of what is really worth knowing than their public- school-bred brothers. For the public school still goes on with the system of teaching it has derived direct from the thirteenth century ; while the girls' schools, having started fair and fresh, are beginning to assimilate certain newer ideas be- longing to the seventeenth and even the eighteenth. In time they may conceivably come down to the more elementary notions of the present genera- tion. Less hampered by professions and examina- tions than the boys, the girls are beginning to know something now, not indeed of the universe in which they live, its laws and its properties, but of literature and history, and the principal facts about human development. Yet all the EYE VERSUS EAR. 129 time, the boys go on as ever with Miisa, Mus«, like so many parrots, and are turned out at last, in nine cases out of ten, with just enough smatter- ing of Greek and Latin grammar to have acquired a life-long distaste for Horace and an inconquer- able incapacity for understanding /Eschylus. One year in Italy with their eyes open would be worth more than three at Oxford ; and six months in the fields with a platyscopic lens would teach them strange things about the world around them that all the long terms at Harrow and Winchester have failed to discover to them. But that would involve some trouble to the teacher. What a misfortune it is that we should thus be compelled to let our boys' schooling interfere with their education ! XVI. THE POLITICAL PUPA. I HA.VE picked up on the moor the chrysalis of a common English butterfly. As I sit on the heather and turn it over attentively, while it wriggles in my hands, I can't help thinking how closely it resembles the present condition of our British commonwealth. It is a platitude, indeed, to say that "this is an age of transition." But it would be truer and more graphic perhaps to put it that this is an age in which England, and for the matter of that every other European country as well, is passing through something like the chrysalis stage in its evolution. But, lirst of all, do you clearly understand what a chrysalis is driving at ? It means more than it seems; the change that goes on within that impassive case is a great deal more profound than most people imagine. When the caterpillar is just ready to turn into a butterfly it lies 130 THE POLITICAL PUPA. ,3, by for a while, full of internal commotion, and feels all its organs slowly melting one by one into a sort of indistinguishable protoplasmic pulp ; chaos precedes the definite re-establishment of a fresh form of order. Limbs and parts and nervous system all disappear for a time, and then gradu- ally grow up again in new and altered types. The caterpillar, if it philosopliised on its own state at all (which seems to be very little the habit of well-conducted caterpillars, as of well- conducted young ladies), might easily be excused for forming just at iirst the melancholy impres- sion that a general dissolution was coming over it piecemeal. It must begin by feeling legs and eyes and nervous centres melt away by degrees into a common indistinguishable organic pulp, out of which the new organs only slowly form themselves in obedience to the law of some internal impulse. But when the process is all over, and— hi, presto !— the butterfly emerges at last from the chrysalis condition, what does it find but that instead of having lost everything it has new and stronger legs in place of the old and feeble ones; it has nerves and brain more developed than before; it has wings for i-,2 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. flight instead of mere creeping little feet to crawl with ? What seemed like chaos was really nothing more than the necessary kneading up of all component parts into a plastic condition which precedes every fresh departure in evolu- tion. The old must fade before the new can replace it. Now I am not going to work this perhaps somewhat fanciful analogy to death, or pretend it is anything more than a convenient metaphor. Still, taken as such, it is not without its lumi- nosity. For a metaphor, by supplying us with a picturable representation, often enables us really to get at the hang of the thing a vast deal better than the most solenm argument. And I fancy communities sometimes pass through just such a chrysalis stage, when it seems to the timid and pessimistic in their midst as if every component element of the State (but especially the one in which they themselves and their friends are particularly interested) were rushing violently down a steep place to eternal perdition. Chaos appears to be swallowing up everything. " The natural relations of classes " disappear. Faiths melt ; churches dissolve ; morals fade ; THE POLITICAL PUPA. 133 bonds fail; a universal magma of emancipated opinion seems to take the place of old-established dogma. The squires and the parsons of the period — call them scribes or augurs — wring their hands in despair, and cry aloud that they don't know what the world is coming to. But, after all, it is only the chrysalis stage of a new system. The old social order must grow disjointed and chaotic before the new social order can be^in to evolve from it. The establishment of a plastic consistency in the mass is the condition precedent of the higher development. Not, of course, that this consideration will ever afiford one grain of comfort to the squires and the parsons of each successive epoch; for what they want is not the reasonable betterment of the whole social organism, but the continuance of just this particular type of squiredom and parsonry. That is what they mean by "national welfare;" and any interference with it they criticise in all ages with the current equivalent for the familiar Tory formula that « the country is going to the devil." Sometimes these great social reconstructions of which I speak are forced upon communities by 134 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. external factors interfering with their fixed in- ternal order, as happened when the influx of northern barbarians broke up the decaying and rotten organism of the Roman Empire. Some- times, again, they occur from internal causes, in an acute, and so to speak, inflammatory condition, as at the French Eevolution. But sometimes, as in our own time and country, they are slowly brought about by organic development, so as really to resemble in all essential points the chrysalis type of evolution. Politically, socially, theologi- cally, ethically, the old fixed beliefs seem at such periods to grow fluid or plastic. New feelings and habits and aspirations take their place. For a while a general chaos of conflicting opinions and nascent ideas is produced. The mass for the moment seems formless and lawless. Then new order supervenes, as the magma settles down and begins to crystallise ; till at last, I'm afraid, the resulting social organism becomes for the most part just as rigid, just as definite, just as dog- matic, just as exacting, as the one it has super- seded. The caterpillar has grown into a particular butterflv. Through just such a period of reconstruction THE POLITICAL PUPA. 135 Europe in general and Britain in particular are now in all likelihood beginning to pass. And they will come out at the other end translated and transfigured. Laws and faiths and morals will all of them have altered. There will be a new heaven and a new earth for the men and women of the new epoch. Strange that people should make such a fuss about a detail like Home Eule, when the foundations of society are all becoming Huid. Don't flatter yourself for a moment that your particular little sect or your particular little dogma is going to survive the gentle cataclysm any more than my particular little sect or ray particular little dogma. All alike are doomed to inevitable reconstruction. " We can't put the Constitution into the meltin"- pot," said Mr. John Morley, if I recollect his words aright. But at the very moment when he said it, in my humble opinion, the Constitution was already well into the melting-pot, and even be- ginning to simmer merrily. Federalism, or some- thing extremely like it, may with great probability be the final outcome of that particular melting; though anything else is perhaps just as probable, and in any case the melting is general, not special. 136 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. The one thing we can guess with tolerable certainty is that the melting-pot stage has begun to overtake us, socially, ethically, politically, ecclesiastically ; and that what will emerge from the pot at the end of it must depend at last upon the relative strength of those unknown quantities — the various formative elements. Being the most optimistic of pessimists, how- ever, I will venture (after this disclaimer of prophecy) to prophesy one thing alone : 'Twill be a butterfly, not a grub, that comes out of our chrysalis. Beyond that, I hold all prediction premature. We may guess and we may hope, but we can have no certainty. Save only the certainty that no element will outlive the revolution unchanged — not faiths, nor classes, nor domestic relations, nor any other component factor of our complex civilisation. All are becoming plastic in the organic plasm ; all are losing features in the common mass of the melting - pot. For that reason, I never trouble my head for a moment when people object to me that this, that, or the other petty point of detail in Bellamy's Utopia or William Morris's Utopia, or my own little private THE POLITICAL PUPA. 137 and particular Utopia, is impossible, or uurealis- able, or wicked, or liateful. For these, after all, are mere Utopias; their details are the outcome of individual wishes; what will emerge must bo, not a Utopia at all, either yours or mine, but a practical reality, full of shifts and compromises most unphilosophical and illogical — a practical reality distasteful in many ways to all us Utopia- mongers. "The Millennium by return of post" is no more realisable to-day tlian yesterday. The greatest of revolutions can only produce that un- satisfactory result, a new human organisation. Yet, it is something, after all, to believe at least that the grub will emerge into a full-fledged butterfly. Not, perhaps, quite as glossy in the wings as we could wish ; but a butterfly all the same, not a crawling caterpillar. XVII. ON THE CASINO TERRACE. I HAVE always regarded Monte Carlo as an Influence for Good. It helps to keep so many- young men off the Stock Exchange. Let me guard against an obvious but unjust suspicion. These remarks are not uttered under the exhilarating efl'ect of winning at the tables. Quite the contrary. It is the Bank that has broken the Man to-day at Monte Carlo. They are rather due to the chastening and thought- compelling influence of persistent loss, not alto- gether unbalanced by a well-cooked lunch at perhaps the best restaurant in any town of Europe. I have lost my little pile. The eight five-franc pieces which I annually devote out of my scanty store to the tutelary god of roulette have been snapped up, one after another, in breathless haste, by the sphinx-like croupiers, impassive priests of that rapacious deity, and 138 ON THE CASINO TERRACE. 139 now I am sitting, cleaned out, by the edge of the terrace, on a brilliant, cloudless, February afternoon, looking across the zoned and belted bay towards the beautiful grey hills of Eocca- bruna and the gleaming white spit of Bordighera in the distance. 'Tis a modest tribute, my poor little forty francs. Surely the veriest puritan, the oiliest Chadband of them all, will allow a humble scribbler, at so cheap a yearly rate, to purchase wisdom, not unmixed with tolerance, at the gilded shrine of Fors Fortuna ! For what a pother, after all, the unwise of this world are wont to make about one stranded gambling-house, in a remote corner of Liguria ! If they were in earnest or sincere, how small a matter they would think it! Of course, when I say so, hypocrisy holds up its hands in holy horror. But that is the way with the purveyors of mint, cumin, and anise ; they raise a mio-htv hubbub over some unimportant detail — in order to feel their consciences clear when business compels them to rob the widow and the orphan. In reality, though Monte Carlo is bad enou«di in its way — do I not pay it unwilling tribute myself twice a year out of the narrow resources 140 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. of The Garret, Grub Street? — it is but a skin- deep surface symptom of a profound disease which attacks the heart and core in London and Paris. Compared with Panama, Argentines, British South Africans, and Liberators, Monte Carlo is a mole on the left ankle. " The Devil's advocate ! " you say. Well, well, so be it. The fact is, the supposed moral objection to gambling as such is a purely com- mercial objection of a commercial nation ; and the reason so much importance is attached to it in certain places is because at that particular vice men are likely to lose their money. It is largely a fetish, like the sinfulness of cards, of dice, of billiards. Moreover, the objection is only to the ki7id of gambling. There is another kind, less open, at which you stand a better chance to win yourself, while other parties stand a better chance to lose ; and that kind, which is played in great gambling-houses known as the Stock Exchange and the Bourse, is considered, morally speaking, as quite innocuous. Large fortunes are made at this other sort of gambling, which, of course, sanctifies and almost canonises it. Indeed, if you will note, you will find ON THE CASINO TERRACE. 141 not only that the objection to gambling pure and simple is commonest in the most commer- cial countries, but also that even there it is commonest among the most commercial classes. The landed aristocracy, the military, and the labouring men have no objection to betting ; nor have the Neapolitan lazzaroni, the Chinese coolies. It is the respectable English counting- house that discourages the vice, especially among the clerks, who are likely to make the till or the cheque-book rectify the little failures of their flutter on the Derby. Observe how artificial is the whole mild out- cry : how absolutely it partakes of the nature of damning the sins you have no mind to! Here, on the terrace where I sit, and where ladies in needlessly costly robes are promenading up and down to exhibit their superfluous wealth ostenta- tiously to one another, my ear is continuously assailed by the constant piiig, ping, ping of the pigeon-shooting, and my peace disturbed by the flapping death-agonies of those miserable victims. Yet how many times have you heard the tables at Monte Carlo denounced to once or never that you have heard a word said of the poor mangled 142 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. pigeons ? And why ? Because nobody loses much money at pigeon-matches. That is legiti- mate sport, about as good and as bad as pheasant or partridge shooting — no better, no worse, in spite of artificial distinctions ; and nobody (except the pigeons) has any interest in denouncing it. Legend has it at Monte Carlo, indeed, that when the proprietors of the Casino wished to take measures " pour attirer les Anglais " they held counsel with the wise men whether it was best to establish and endow an English church or a pigeon-shooting tournament. And the church was in a minority. Since then, I have heard more than one Anglican Bishop speak evil of the tables, but I have never heard one of them say a good word yet for the boxed and slaughtered pigeons. Let me take a more striking because a less hackneyed case — one that still fewer people would think of. Everybody who visits Monte Carlo gets there, of course, by the P.L.M. If you know this coast at all you will know that P.L.M. is the curt and universal abbreviation for the Paris, Lyon, Mediterranee Railway Company — in all probability the most gigantic and wickedest mono- ON THE CASINO TERRACE. 143 poly on the face of this planet. Yet you never once heard a voice raised yet against the com- pany as a company. Individual complaints get into the Times, of course, about the crowding of the train de hixe, the breach of faith as to places, and the discomforts of the journey; but never a glimmering conception seems to flit across the popular mind that here is a Colossal Wrong, compared to which Monte Carlo is but as a flel- bite to the Asiatic cholera. This chartered abuse connects the three biggest towns in France— Paris, Lyon, Marseilles— and is absolutely without com- petitors. It can do as it likes; and it does it, regardless— I say " regardless," witnout qualifica- tion, because the P.L.M. regards nobody and nothing. Yet one hears of no righteous indigna- tion, no uprising of the people in their angry thousands, no moral recognition of the monopoly as a Wicked Thing, to be fought tooth and nail, without quarter given. It probably causes a greater aggregate of human misery in a week than Monte Carlo in a century. Besides, the one is compulsory, the other optional. You needn't risk a louis on the tables unless you choose, but, like it or lump it, if you're bound 14+ POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. for Nice or Cannes or Mentone, you must open your mouth and shut your eyes and see what P.L.M. will send you. Our own railways, indeed, are by no means free from blame at the hands of the Democracy : the South-Eastern has not earned the eternal gratitude of its season-ticket holders; the children of the Great Western do not rise up and call it blessed. (Except, indeed, in the most uncomplimentary sense of blessing.) But the r.L.M. goes much further than these ; and I have always held that the one solid argu- ment for eternal punishment consists in the im- probability that its Board of Directors will be permitted to go scot-free for ever after all their iniquities. I am not wholly joking. I mean the best part of it. Great monopolies that abuse their trust are far more dangerous enemies of public morals than an honest gambling-house at every corner. Monte Carlo as it stands is just a con- centrated embodiment of all the evils of our anti- social system, and the tables are by far the least serious among them. It is an Influence for Good, because it mirrors our own world in all its naked, all its over-draped hideousness. There it rears • '•ki'i HHVli" ON THE CASINO TERRACE. 145 its meretricious head, that gaudy Palace of Sin, appropriately decked in its Haussmanesque archi- tecture and its coquettish gardens, attracting to itself all the idle, all the vicious, all the rich, all the unworthy, from every corner of Europe and America. But Monte Carlo didn't make them; it only gathers to its bosom its own chosen children from the places where they are produced — from London, Paris, Brussels, New York, Berlin, St. Petersburg. The vices of our organisation begot these over-rich folk, begot their diamond-decked women, and their clipp°ed French poodles with gold bangles spanning their aristocratic legs. These are the spawn of land- owning, of capitalism, of military domination, of High Finance, of all the social ills that flesh is heir to. I feel as I pace the terrace in the broad Mediterranean sunshine, that I am here in the midst of the very best society Europe affords. That is to say, the very worst. The dukes and the money-lenders, the Jay Goulds and the Eeinachs. The idlest, the cruellest : the hereditary drones, the successful blood-suckers. But to find fault with them only for trying to win one another's ill-gotten gold at a fair and open 146 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. game of trcntc-et-quamnte, with the odds against them, and then to say nothing about the way they came by it, is to make a needless fuss about a trifle of detail, while overlooking the weightiest moral problems of humanity. Whoever allows red herrings like these to be trailed across the path of his moral consciousness, to the detriment of the scent which should lead him straighu on to the lairs of gigantic evils, deserves little credit either for conscience or saga- city. My son, be wise. Strike at the root of the evil. Let Monte Carlo go, but keep a stern eye on London ground-rents. XVIII. THE CELTIC FRINGE. We Celts henceforth will rule the roost in Britain. What is that you mutter ? " A very inoppor- tune moment to proclaim the fact." Well, no, I don't think so. And I'm sorry to hear you say it, for if there is a quality on which I plume myself, it's the delicate tact that makes me refrain from irritating the susceptibilities of the sensitive Saxon. See how polite I am to him! I call him sensitive. But, opportune or inoppor- tune, Lord Salisbury says we are a Celtic fringe. I beg to retort, we are the British people. "Conquered races," say my friends. Well, grant it for a moment. But in civilised societies, conquerors have, sooner or later, to amalgamate with the conquered. And where the vanquished are more numerous, they absorb the victors in- stead of being absorbed by them. That is the 148 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. Nemesis of conquest. Rome annexed Etruria ; and Etruscan Mcecenas, Etruscan Sejanus organ- ised and consolidated the Eonian Empire. Rome annexed Italy; and the Jus Italicum grew at last to be the full Roman franchise. Rome annexed the civilised world; and the provinces under Csesar blotted out the Senate. Britain is passing now through the self-same stage. One inevitable result of the widening of the electorate has been the transfer of power from the Teutonic to the Celtic half of Britain. I repeat, we are no longer a Celtic fringe : at the polls, in Parlia- ment, we are the British people. Lord Salisbury may fail to perceive that fact, or, as I hold more probable, may affect to ignore it. What will such tactics avail? The ostrich is not usually counted among men as a perfect model of political wisdom. And are we, after all, the conquered peoples? Meseems, I doubt it. They say we Celts dearly love a paradox — which is perhaps only the sensible Saxon way of envisaging the fact that we catch at new truths somewhat quicker than other people. At any rate, 'tis a pet little paradox of my own that we have never been THE CELTIC FRINGE. 149 conquered, and that to our unconquered state we owe in the main our Eadicalism, our Socialism, our ingrained love of political freedom. We are tribal not feudal; we think the folk more im- portant than his lordship. The Saxon of the south-east is the conquered man: he has felt on his neck for generations the heel of feudalism. He is slavish; he is snobbish; he dearly loves a lord. He shouts himself hoarse for his Beacons- field or his Salisbury. Till lately, in his rural avatar, he sang but one sons: — " God bless the squire and his relations, And keep us in our proper stations." Trite, isn't it ? but so is the Saxon intelligence. Seriously — for at times it is well to be serious — Soutli-Eastern England, the England of the plains, has been conquered and enslaved in a dozen ages by each fresh invader. Before the dawn of history, Heaven knows what shadowy Belgse and Iceni enslaved it. But historical time will serve our purpose. The Eoman enslaved it, but left Caledonia and Hibernia free, the Cam- brian, the Silurian, the Cornishman half-subju- gated. The Saxon and Anglian enslaved the I50 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. east, but scarcely crossed over the watershed of the western ocean. The Dane, in turn, enslaved the Saxon in East Anglia and Yorkshire. The Norman ground all down to a common servitude between the upper and nether millstones of the feudal system — the king and the nobleman. At the end of it all, Teutonic England was reduced to a patient condition of contented serfdom: it had accommodated itself to its environment : no wish was left in it for the assertion of its freedom. To this day, the south-east, save where leavened and permeated by Celtic influences, hugs its chains and loves them. It produces the strange portent of the Conservative working-man, who yearns to be led by Lord Kandolph Churchill. With the North and the West, things go wholly otherwise. Even Cornwall, the earliest Celtic kincrdom to be absorbed, was rather absorbed than conquered. I won't go into the history of the West Welsh of Somerset, Devon, and Corn- wall at full length, because it would take ten pages to explain it; and I know that readers are too profoundly interested in the Shocking Murder in the Borough Road to devote half-an- liour to the origin and evolution of their own THE CELTIC FRINGE. 151 community. It must suffice to say that the Devonian and Cornubian Welsh coalesced with the West Saxon for resistance to their common enemy the Dane, and that the West Saxon kingdom was made supreme in Britain by the founder of the English monarchy — one Dunstan, a monk from the West Welsh Abbey of Glas- tonbury. Wales proper, overrun piecemeal by Norman hlibusterers, was roughly annexed by the Plantagenet kings ; but it was only pacified under the Welsh Tudors, and was never at any time thoroughly feudalised. Glendower's rebellion, Richmond's rebellion, the Wesleyan revolt, the Rebecca riots, the tithe war, are all continuous parts of the ceaseless reaction of gallant little Wales against Teutonic aggression. " An alien Church" still disturbs the Principality. The Lake District and Ayrshire — Celtic Cumbria and Strathclyde — only accepted by degrees the supre- macy of the Kings of England and Scotland. The brother of a Scotch King was Prince of Cumbria, as the elder son of an English King was Prince of Wales. Indeed, David of Cumbria, who became David I. of Scotland, was the real consolidator of the Scotch kingdom. Cumbria 152 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. was no more conquered by the Saxon Lothians than Scotland v,as conquered by the accession of James I. or by the Act of Union. That means absorption, conciliation, a certain degree of tribal independence. For Ireland, we know that the " mere Irish " were never subjugated at all till the days of Henry VII. ; that they had to be recon- quered by Cromwell and by William of Orange ; that they rebelled more or less throughout the eighteenth century ; and that they have been thorns in the side of Tory England through the whole of the nineteenth. As for the Highlands, they held out against the Stuarts till England had rejected that impossible dynasty ; and then they rallied round the Stuarts as the enemies of the Saxon. General Wade's roads and the forts in the Great Glen, aided by a few trifles of Glencoe massacres, kept them quiet for a moment. But it was only for a moment. The North is once more in open revolt. Dr. Clark and the crofters are its mode of expressing itself. Nor is that all. The Celtic ideas have re- mained unaltered. Of course, I am not silly enough to believe there is any such thing as a Celtic race. I use the word merely as a con- THE CELTIC FRINGE. 153 venient label for the league of the unconquered peoples in Britain. Ireland alone contains half- a-dozen races ; and none of them appear to have anything in common with the Pict of Aberdeen- shire or the West- Welsh of Cornwall. All I mean when I speak of Celtic ideas and Celtic ideals is the ideas and ideals proper and common to unconquered races. As compared with the feudalised and contented serf of South-Eastern England, are not the Irish peasant, the Scotch clansman, the "statesman" of the dales, the Cornish miner, free men every soul of them ? English landlordism, imposed from without upon the crofter of Skye or the rack-rented tenant of a Connemara hillside, has never crushed out the native feeling of a right to the soil, the native resistance to an alien system. The south-east, I assert, has been brutalised into acquiescent serfdom by a long course of feudalism ; the west and north still retain the instincts of freemen. As long as South-Eastern England and the Nor- manised or feudalised Saxon lowlands of Scotland contained all the wealth, all the power, and most of the population of Britain, the Celtic ideals had no chance of realising themselves. But the in- 154 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. dustrial revolution of the present century has turned us right - about - face, has transferred the balance of power from the secondary strata to the primary strata in Britain ; from the agricultural lowlands to the uplands of coal and iron, the cotton factories, the woollen trade. Great in- dustrial cities have grown up in the Celtic or semi-Celtic area — Glasgow, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Bradford, Sheffield, Belfast, Aberdeen, Car- diff. The Celt — that is to say, the mountaineer and the man of the untouched country — repro- duces his kind much more rapidly than the Teuton. The Highlander and the Irishman swarm into Glasgow ; the Irishman and the Welshman swarm into Liverpool; the west-countryman into Bristol ; Celts of all types into London, South- ampton, Newport, Birmingham, Sheffield. This eastward return-wave of Celts upon the Teuton has leavened the whole mass ; if you look at the leaders of Kadicalism in England you will find they bear, almost without exception, true Celtic surnames. Chartists and Socialists of the first generation were marshalled by men of Cymric descent, like Ernest Jones and Robert Owen, or by pure-blooded Irishmen like Fergus O'Connor. THE CELTIC FRINGE. 155 It is not a mere accident that the London Socialists of the present day should be led by Welshmen like "William Morris, or by the eloquent brogue of Bernard Shaw's audacious oratory. We Celts now lurk in every corner of Britain ; we have permeated it with our ideas ; we have in- spired it with our aspirations ; we have roused the Celtic remnant in the south-east itself to a sense of their wrongs ; and we are marching to- day, all abreast, to the overthrow of feudalism. If Lord Salisbury thinks we are a Celtic fringe he is vastly mistaken. But he doesn't really think so : 'tis a piece of his ponderous Saxon humour. Talk of " Batavian grace," indeed ! Well, the Cecils came first from the fens of Lincolnshire. XIX. IMAGINATION AND RADICALS. Conservatism, I believe, is mainly due to want of imagination. In saying this, I do not for a moment mean to deny the other and equally obvious truth that Conservatism, in the lump, is a euphemism for selfishness. But the two ideas have much in common. Selfish people are apt to be unimagi- native : unimaginative people are apt to be selfish. Clearly to realise the condition of the unfortu- nate is the beginning of philanthropy. Clearly to realise the rights of others is the beginning of justice. " Put yourself in his place " strikes the keynote of ethics. Stupid people can only see their own side of a question : they cannot even imagine any other side possible. So, as a rule, stupid people are Conservative. They cling to what they have ; they dread revision, redis- tribution, justice. Also, if a man has imagiua- is6 IMAGINATION AND RADICALS. 157 tion he is likely to be Eadical, even though sel- fish ; while if he has no imagination he is likelv to be Conservative, even though otherwise eood and kind-hearted. Some men are Conservative from defects of heart, while some are Conservative from defects of head. Conversely, most imagina- tive peoDle are Eadical ; for even a bad man may sometimes uphold the side of right Ijecause he has intelligence enough to understand that thinirs might be better managed in the future for all than they are in the present. But when I say that Conservatism is mainly due to want of imagination, I mean more than that. Most people are wholly unable to conceive in their own minds any state of things very different from the one they have been born and brought up in. The picturing power is lacking. They can conceive the past, it is true, more or less vaguely — because they have always heard things once were so, and because the past is generally realisable still by the light of the relics it has bequeathed to the present. But they can't at all conceive the future. Ima^ina- tion fails them. Innumerable difficulties crop up for them in the way of every proposed improve- 158 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. ment. Before there was any County Council for London, such people thought municipal govern- ment for the metropolis an insoluble problem. Now that Home Rule quivers trembling in the balance, they think it would pass the wit of man to devise in the future a federal league for the component elements of the United Kingdom; in spite of the fact that the wit of man has already devised one for the States of the Union, for tlie Provinces of the Dominion, for the com- ponent Cantons of the Swiss Republic. To the unimaginative mind difficulties everywhere seem almost insuperable. It shrinks before trifles. " Im- possible ! " said Napoleon. " There is no such word in my dictionary ! " He had been trained in the school of the French Revolution — which was not carried out by unimaginative pettifoggers. To people without imagination any change you propose seems at once impracticable. They are ready to bring up endless objections to the mode of working it. There would be this difficulty in the way, and that difficulty, and the other one. You would think, to hear them talk, the world as it stands was absolutely perfect, and moved without a hitch in all its bearings. They don't IMAGINATION AND RADICALS. 159 see that every existing institution just bristles with difficulties — and that the difficulties are met or got over somehow. Often enough while they swallow the camel of existing abuses they strain at some gnat which they fancy they see flying in at the window of Utopia or of the Millennium. " If your reform were carried," they say in effect, "we should, doubtless, get rid of such and such flagrant evils ; but the streets in November would be just as muddy as ever, and slight incon- venience might be caused in certain improbable contingencies to the duke or the cotton-spinner, the squire or the mine-owner." They omit to note that much graver inconvenience is caused at present to the millions who are shut out from the fields and the sunshine, who are sweated all day for a miserable wage, or who are forced to pay fancy prices for fuel to gratify the rapacity of a handful of coal-grabbers. Lack of imagination makes people fail to see the evils that are ; makes them fail to realise the good that might be. I often fancy to myself what such people would say if land had always been communal property, and some one now proposed to hand it over abso- i6o POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. lutely to the dukes, the squires, the game-pre- servers, and the coal-owners. '"Tis impossible," they would exclaim ; " the thing wouldn't be work- able. Why, a single landlord might own half Westminster! A single landlord might own all Sutherlandshire ! The hypothetical Duke of West- minster might put bars to the streets ; he might impede locomotion ; he might refuse to let certain people to whom he objected take up their resi- dence in any part of his territory; he might prevent them from following their own trades or professions ; he might even descend to such petty tyranny as tabooing brass plates on the doors of houses. And what would you do then? The thing isn't possible. The Duke of Sutherland, again, might shut up all Sutherlandshire; might turn whole vast tracts into grouse-moor or deer- forest ; might prevent harmless tourists from walk- ing up the mountains. And surely free Britons would never submit to that. The bare idea is ridiculous. The squire of a rural parish might turn out the Dissenters ; might refuse to let land for the erection of chapels; might behave like a petty King Augustus of Scilly. Indeed, there would be nothing to prevent an American alien IMA GIN A TION AND RA DICA LS. 1 6 r from buying up square miles of purple heather in Scotland, and shutting the inhabitants of these British Isles out of their own inheritance. Sites might be refused for needful public purposes ; fancy prices might be asked for pure cupidity. Speculators would job land for the sake of un- earned increment J towns would have to grow as landlords willed, irrespective of the wants or con- venience of the community. Theoretically, I don't even see that Lord Eothschild mightn't buy up the whole area of Middlesex, and turn London into a Golden House of Nero. Your scheme can't be worked. The anomalies are too obvious." They are indeed. Yet I doubt whether the unimaginative would quite have foreseen them : the things they foresee are less real and possible. But they urge against every reform such objec- tions as I have parodied; and they urge them about matters of far less vital importance. The existing system exists; they know its abuses, its checks and its counter-checks. The system of the future does not yet exist; and they can't imagine how its far slighter difficulties could ever be smoothed over. They are not the least staggered by the appalling reality of the Duke L i62 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. of Westminster or the Duke of Sutherland ; not the least staggered by the sinister power of a con- spiracy of coal-owners to paralyse a great nation with the horrors of a fuel famine. But they are staggered by their bogey that State ownership of land might give rise to a certain amount of jobbery and corruption on the part of officials. They think it better that the dukes and the squires should get all the rent than that the State should get most of it, with the possibility of a percentage being corruptly embezzled by the functionaries who manage it. This shows want of imagination. It is as though one should say to one's clerk, " All your income shall be paid in future to the Duke of Westminster, and not to yourself, for his sole use and benefit; because we, your employers, are afraid that if we give you your salary in person, you may let some of it be stolen from you or badly invested." How transparently absurd ! We want our income our- selves, to spend as we please. We would rather risk losing one per cent, of it in bad investments than let all be swallowed up by the dukes and the landlords. IMAGINATION AND RADICALS. 163 It is the same throughout. Want of imagina- tion makes people exaggerate the difficulties and dangers of every new scheme, because they can't picture constructively to themselves the details of its working. Men with great picturing power, like Shelley or Eobespierre, are always very advanced Eadicals, and potentially revolutionists. The difficulty theij see is not the difficulty of making the thing work, but the difficulty of con- vincing less clear-headed people of its desirability and practicability. A great many Conservatives, who are Conservative from selfishness, would be Radicals if only they could feel for themselves that even their own petty interests and pleasures are not really menaced. The squires and the dukes can't realise how much happier even they would be in a free, a beautiful, and a well-organised community. Imaginative minds can picture a world where everything is so ordered that life comes as a constant aesthetic delight to everybody. They know that that world could be realised to-morrow — if only all others could picture it to themselves as vividly as they do. But they also know that it can only be attained in the l64 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. end by long ages of struggle, and by slow evolu- tion of the essentially imaginative ethical faculty. For right action depends most of all, in the last resort, upon a graphic conception of the feelings of others. ABOUT ABROAD. The place known as Abroad is not nearly so nice a country to live in as England. The people who inhabit Abroad are called Foreigners. They are in every way and at all times inferior to Englishmen. These Post-Prandials used once to be provided with a sting in their tail, like the common scorpion. By way of change, I turn them out now with a sting in their head, like the common mosquito. Mosquitoes are much less dangerous than scorpions, but they're a deal more irritatinc^. Not that I am sanguine enough to expect I shall irritate Englishmen. Your Englishman is far too cock-sure of the natural superiority of Britons to Foreigners, the natural superiority of England to Abroad, ever to be irritated by even the gentlest criticism. He accepts it all with lordly indifference. He brushes it aside as the i6s 166 POST-PRANDIAL PJULOSOPIIY. olophant mi^lit brusli aside the ineffective ^'fidfly. No x^i'oboscis can ])ieice tliat pacliyderniato'.i« liide ol' liis. If you praise him to liis face, he accepts your praise as his obvious due, witli perfect com- posure and without th(; slightest (;lation. If you blame liim in aught, he s(jts it down to your i^morance and mental inferiority. You say to him, "Oh, Englishman, you are great; you are wise; you are rich beynd conijjarison. You are noble ; you are generous ; you are the prince among nations." He smiles a calm smile, and thinks you a very sensible fellow. But you add, " Oh, my lord, if I may venture to say so, there is a smudge on your nose, which I make bold to attribute to the settlement of a black on your intelligent countenance." He is not angry. He is not even contemptuously amused. He responds, " My friend, you are wrong. There is never a smudge on my immaculate face. No blacks lly in London. The sky is as clear there in Novem- ber as in August, All is pure and serene and beautiful." You answer, " Oh, my lord, I admit the force of your profound reasoning. You light the gas at ten in the morning only to show all the world you can afford to Imrn it." At that, he ABOUT ABROAD. 167 gropes Ill's way aloni^- T'all Mall to his club, and t(!lls tlio men lie meets there how completely he silenced you. And yet, My Lord Elephant, there is use in mosquitoes. Mr. Mattieu Williams once dis- covered the final cause of fleas. Certain peojile, said he, cannot be induced to employ the harmless necessary tub. For them, Providence designed the lively flea. He compels them to scratch themselves. By so doing they rouse the skin to action and get rid of impurities. Now, this liritish use of the word Al^road is a smudge on the face of the otherwise perfect Englishman. Perchance a mosquito-bite may induce him to remove it with a little warm water and a cambric pocket-hand- kerchief. To most Englishmen, the world divides itself naturally into two une([uul and non-equivalent portions — Abroad and England. Of these two, Abroad is much the larger country ; but England, though smaller, is vastly more important. Abroad is inhabited by Frenchmen and Germans, who speak their own foolish and chattering laniiua^es. Part of it is likewise pervaded by Chinamen, who wear jugtails ; and the outlying districts belong .^_ «- .,--. i68 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. to the poor heathen, chiefly interesting as a fiehl of missionary enterprise, and a possible market for Manchester piece-goods. We sometimes invest our money abroad, but then we are likely to get it swallowed up in Mexicans or Egyptian Unified. If you ask most people what has become of Tom, tliey will answer at once with the specific infor- mation, " Oh, Tom has gone Abroad." I have one stereotyped rejoinder to an answer like that. " What part of Abroad, please ? " That usually stumps them. Abroad is Abroad ; and like tlie gentleman who was asked in examination to " name the minor prophets," they decline to make invidious distinctions. It is nothing to them whether he is tea-planting in the Himalayas, or sheep-farming in Australia, or orange-growing in Florida, or ranching in Colorado. If he is not in England, why then he is elsewhere ; and elsewhere is Abroad, one and indivisible. In short. Abroad answers in space to that well- known and definite date, the Olden Time, in chronology. People will tell you, " Foreigners do this " ; " Foreigners do that " ; " Foreigners smoke so much " ; " Foreigners alwavs take coffee for break- ' ^^^-— * • fc- *- aa 1 ABOUT ABROAD. 169 fast." " Indeed," I love to answer ; *' I've never observed it myself in Central Asia." 'Tis Parson Adams and the Christian religion. Nine Eni^lish people out of ten, wlien tlicy talk of Abroad, mean what tliey call the Continent; and when they talk of the Continent, they mean France, Ger- many, Switzerland, Italy; in short, the places most visited by Englishmen when they consent now and again to go Abroad for a holiday. " I don't like Abroad," a lady once said to me on her return from Calais. Foreigners, in like manner, means Frenchmen, Germans, Swiss, Italians. In the coimtry called Abroad, the most important parts are the parts nearest England ; of the jjcople called Foreigners, the most important are those who dress like Englishmen. The dim black lands that lie below the horizon are liardly worth noticing. Would it surprise you to learn that most people live in Asia? Would it surprise you to learn that most people are poor benighted heathen, and that, of the remainder, most people are Mahommedans, and that of the Christians, who come next, most people arc; Eoinan Catholics, and that, of the other Christian sects, most people I70 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. belong to the Greek Church, and that, last of all, we get Protestants, more particularly Anglicans, Wesleyans, Baptists ? Have you ever really realised the startling fact that England is an island off the coast of Europe? that Europe is a peninsula at the end of Asia ? that France, Germany, Italy, are the fringe of Paissia? Have you ever really realised that the English-speak- ing race lives mostly in America ? that the country is vastly more populous than London ? that our class is the froth and the scum of society ? Think these things out, and try to measure them on the globe. And when you speak of Abroad, do please specify what part of it. Abroad is not all alike. There are differences between Poland, Peru, and Palestine. What is true of France is not true of Fiji. Distinguish carefully between Timbuctoo, Tobolsk, and Toledo. It is not our insularity that makes us so insular. 'Tis a gift of the gods, peculiar to Englishmen. The other inhabitants of these Isles of Britain are comparatively cosmopolitan. The Scotchman goes everywhere ; the world is his oyster. Ireland is an island still more remote than Great Britain ; but the Irishman has never been so insular as ABOUT ABROAD. 171 the English. I put that down in part to his Catholicism : his priests have been wheels in a world-wide system ; his relations have been with Douai, St. Omer, and Eome ; his bishops have gone pilgrimages and sat on Vatican Councils ; his kinsmen are the MacMahons in France, the O'Doniiels in Spain, the Taafes in Austria. Even in the days of the Eegency this was so : look at Lever and his heroes ! When England drank port, County Clare drank claret. But ever since the famine, Ireland has expanded. Every Irish- man has cousins in Canada, in Australia, in New York, in San Francisco. The Empire is Irish, with the exception of India ; and India, of course, is a Scotch dependency. Irishmen and Scotchmen have no such feelings about Abroad and its Foreigners as Londoners entertain. But English- men never quite get over the sense that everybody must needs divide the world into England and Elsewhere. To the end no Englishman really grasps the fact that to Frenchmen and Germans he himself is a foreigner. I have met John Bulls who had passed years in Italy, but who spoke of the countrymen of Caesar and Dante and Leonardo and Garibaldi with the contemptuous toleration 172 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. one might feel towards a child or an Andaman Islander. These Italians could build Giotto's campanile ; could paint the Transfiguration ; could carve the living marble on the tombs of the Medici; could produce the Vita Nuova; could beget Galileo, Galvani, Beccaria ; but still — they were Foreigners. Providence in its wisdom has decreed that they must live Abroad — ^just as it has decreed that a comprehension of the decimal system and its own place in the world should be limitations eternally imposed upon the English intellect. XXL WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL. As I strolled across the moor this afternoon towards Waverley, I saw Jones was planting out that bare hillside of his with Douglas pines and Scotch firs and new strains of silver birches. They will improve the landscape. And I thought as I scanned them, " How curious that most people entirely overlook this constant betterment and beautifying of England! You hear them talk much of the way bricks and mortar are invading the country; you never hear anything of this slow and silent process of planting and developing which has made England into the prettiest and one of the most beautiful countries in Europe." What's that you say? "Astonished to find I have a good word of any sort to put in for England!" Why, dear me, how irrational you are! I just love England. Can any man with eyes in his head and a soul for beauty do other- 173 174 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. wise? England and Italy — there you have the two great glories of Europe. Italy for towns, for art, for man's handicraft; England for country, for nature, for green lanes and lush copses. Was it not one that loved Italy well who sighed in Italy — " Oh, to he in England now tliut April's there ? " And who that loves Italy, and knows England, too, does not echo Browning's wish when April comes round again on dusty Tuscan hilltops? At Perugia, last spring, through weeks of tramontana, how one yearned for the sight of yellow English primroses ! Not love England, indeed ! Milton's England, Shelley's England; the England of the skylark, the dog-rose, the honeysuckle ! Not love England, forsooth! Why, I love every flower, every blade of grass in it. Devonshire lane, close- cropped down, rich water-meadow, bickering brook- let : ah me, how they tug at one's heartstrings in Africa ! No son of the soil can love England as those love her very stones who have come from newer lands over sea to her ivy- clad church- towers, her mouldering castles, her immemorial elms, the berries on her holly, the may in her hedgerows. WHY ENGLAND IS BEAU IIFUL. 175 Are not all these bound up in our souls with each cherished line of Shakespeare and Words- worth ? do they not rouse faint echoes of Gray and Goldsmith? Even before I ever set foot in England, how I longed to behold my first cowslip, my first foxglove! And now, I have wandered through tlie footpaths that run obliquely across English pastures, picking meadowsweet and fritillaries, for half a lifetime, till I have learned by heart every leaf and every petal. You think because I dislike one squalid village—" The Wen," stout English William Cobbett delighted to call it — I don't love England. You think because I see some spots on the sun of the English char- acter, I don't love Englishmen. Why, how can any man who speaks the English tongue, and boasts one drop of English blood in his veins, not be proud of England? England, the mother of poets and thinkers; England, that gave us Newton, Darwin, Spencer ; England, that holds in her lap Oxford, Salisbury, Durham; England of daisy and heather and pine- wood ! Are we hewn out of granite, to be cold before England ? Upon my soul, your unseasonable interruption has almost made me forget what I was going to 176 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. say ; it has made me grow warm, and drop into poetry. England, I take it, is certainly the prettiest country in Europe. It is almost the most beauti- ful. I say "almost," because I bethink me of Norway and Switzerland. I say " country," be- cause I bethink me of Eome, Venice, Florence. But, taking it as country, and as country alone, nothing else approaches it. Have you ever thought why ? Man made the town, says the proverb, and God made the country. Not so in England. There, man made the country, and beautified it exceedingly. In itself, the land of south-eastern England is absolutely the same as the land of Northern France — that hideous tract about Boulosjrne and Amiens which we traverse in silence every time we run across by Calais to Paris. Chalk and clay and sandstone stretch continuously under sea from Kent and Sussex to Flanders and Picardy. The Channel burst through, and made the Straits of Dover ; but the land on either side was and still is geologically and physically identical. What has made the difference ? Man, the planter and gardener. England is beautiful by copse and hedgerow, by WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL. 177 pine-clad ridge and willow-covered hollow, by meadows interspersed witli great spreading oaks, by pastures where drowsy sheep, deep-fleeced and ruddy-stained, huddle under the shade of ancestral beech-trees. Its loveliness is human. In itself, I believe, the actual contour of England cannot once have been much better than the contour of northern France — though nowadays it is hard indeed to realise it. Judicious planting, and a constant eye to picturesque effect in scenery, have made England what she is — the garden of Europe. Of course there are parts of the country which owed, and still owe, their beauty to their wildness — Dartmoor, Exmoor, the West iiidiug of York- shire, the Surrey hills, the Peak in Derbyshire. Yet even these depend more than you would believe, when you take them in detail, on the art of the forester. The view from Leith Hill embraces John Evelyn's woods at Wotton : the larches that cover one Juru-like gorge were set there well within your and my memory. But elsewhere in England the hand of man has done absolutely everything. The American, when he first visits England, is charmed on his way up M 178 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. from Liverpool to London by the exquisite air of antique cultivation and soft rural beauty. The very sward is moss-like. Thoroughly wild country, indeed, unless bold and mountainous, does not often please one. It is apt to be bare, unattrac- tive, and desolate. Witness the Veldt, the Steppes, the prairies. You may go through miles and miles of the States and Canada, where the wildness for the most part rather repels than delights you. I do not say everywhere ; in places the wilderness will blossom like a rose ; boggy margins of lakes, fallen trunks in the forest overgrown with wild flowers, make scenes unattainable in our civilised England. Even our roughest scenery is compara- tively man-made : our heaths are game preserves ; our woodlands are thinned of superfluous under- brush ; our moors are relieved by deliberate plan- tations. But England in her own way is unique and unrivalled. Such parks, such greensward, such grassy lawns, such wooded tilth, are wholly unknown elsewhere. Compare the blank fields and long poplar- fringed high rouds of central France with our Devon or our Warwickshire, and you get at once a just measure of the vast, the unspeakable difference. WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL. 179 And man has done it all. Alone he did it. Often as I take my walks abroad — and when I say abroad I mean in England — I see men at work dotting about exotics of variegated foliage on some barren hillside, and I say to myself, "There, before my eyes, goes on the beautifying of England." Thirty years ago, the North Downs near Dorking were one bare stretch of white chalky sheep-walk ; half of them still remain so ; the other half I. as been planted irregularly with copses and spinneys, which serve to throw up and enhance the beauty of the unaltered intervals. Beech and larch in autumn tints set off smooth patches of grass and juniper. Within the last few years, the downs about Leatherhead have been similarly diversified. Much of the loveli- ness of rural England is due, one must frankly confess, to the big landlords. Though the great houses love us not, we must allow at least that the great houses have cared for the trees in the hedge-rows, and for the timber in the meadows, as well as for the covert that sheltered their pheasants, their foxes, and their gamekeepers. But almost as much of England's charm is due i8o POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. to individual small owners or occupiers. *Tis they who have planted the grounds about villa or cottage ; they who have stocked the sweet old gardens of yew and box, of hollyhock and peony ; they who have given us the careless rustic grace of the English village. Still, one way or another, man has done it all, whether in grange or in manor-house, in palatial estate or in labourer's holding. Look at the French or Belgian hamlet by the side of the English one; look at the French or Belgian farm by the side of our English wealth in wooded glen or sheltered homestead. Bricks and mortar are not covering the whole of England. That is only true of the squalid purlieus and outliers of London, whither Londoners gravitate by mutual attraction. If you will go and live in a dingy suburb, you can't reasonably complain that all the world's suburban. Being the most cheerful of pessimists, a dweller in the country all the days of my life, I have no hesitation in expressing my profound conviction that within my memory more has been done to beautify than to uglify England. Only, the beaut itication has been quiet and unobtrusive, WHY ENGLAND IS BEAUTIFUL. i8i while the uglification has been obvious and con- centrated. It takes half a year to jerry-build a dingy street, but it takes a decade for newly- planted trees to give the woodland air by im- perceptible stages to a stretch of country. XXII. ANENT ART PRODUCTION. Yesterday, at Bordighera, I strolled up the hills behind the town to Sasso. It is a queer little cluster of gleaming white-washed houses that top the crest of a steep ridge ; and, like many other Italian villages, it makes a brave show from a distance, though within it is full of evil smells and all uncleanness. But I found it had a church — a picturesquely ugly and dilapidated church ; and without and within, this church was decorated by inglorious hands with very naive and rudi- mentary frescoes. The Four Evangelists were there, in flowing blue robes ; and the Four Greater Prophets, with long white beards ; and the Ma- donna, appearing in most wooden clouds ; and the Patron Saint tricked out for his Festa in gorgeous holiday episcopal vestments. That was all — ^just the common everyday Italian country church that everybody has seen turned out to 183 ANENT ART PRODUCTION. 183 pattern with manufacturing regularity a hundred times over ! Yet, as I sat among the olive-terraces looking down the steep slope into the Borghetto valley, and across the gorge to the green pines on the Cima, it set me thinking. 'Tis a bad habit one falls into when one has nothing better to turn one's mind to. We English, coming to Italy with our ideas fully formed about everything on heaven and earth, naturally say to ourselves, "Great heart alive, what sadly degraded frescoes ! To think the art of Eaphael and Andrea del Sarto should degenerate even here, in their own land, to such a childish level ! " But we are wrong, for all that. It is Eaphael and Andrea who rose, not my poor nameless Sasso artists who sank and degenerated. Italy was capable of producing her great painters in her own great day, just because in thousands of such Italian villages there were work-a-day artisans in form and colour capable of turning out such ridiculous daubs as those that decorate this tawdry church on the Ligurian hilltop. We English, in short, think of it all the wrong way uppermost. We think of it topsy-turvy, 1 84 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. beginning at the end, while evohition invariably begins at the beginning. The Eaphaels and Andreas, to put it in brief, were the final flower and fullest outcome of whole races of church decorators in infantile fresco. Everywhere you go in Italy, this truth is forced upon your attention even to the present day. Art here is no exotic. It smacks of the soil ; it springs spontaneous, like a weed ; it burgeons of itself out of the heart of the people. Not high art, understand well ; not the art of Burne- Jones and Whistler and Puvis de Chavannes and Sar Peladan. Commonplace everyday art, that is a trade and a handicraft, like the joiner's or the shoemaker's. Look up at your ceiling ; it's overrun with festoons of crude red and blue flowers, or it's covered with cupids and graces, or it bristles with arabesques and unmeaning phantasies. Every wall is painted; every grotto decorated. Sham landscapes, sham loggias, sham parapets are everywhere. The sham windows themselves are provided, not only with sham blinds and sham curtains, but even with sham coquettes making sham eyes or waving sham handkerchiefs at passers-by below them. Open- ANENT ART PRODUCTION. 185 air fresco painting is still a living art, an art practised by hundreds and thousands of craftsmen, an art as alive as cookery or weaving. The Italian decorates everything ; his pottery, his house, his church, his walls, his palaces. And the only difference he feels between the various cases is, that in some of them a higher type of art is demanded by wealth and skill than in the' others. No wonder, therefore, he blossomed out at last into Michael Angelo's frescoes in the Sistine Chapel ! To us English, on the contrary, high art is something exotic, separate, alone, sui generis. We never think of the plaster star in the middle of our ceiling as belonging even to the same range of ideas as, say, the frescoes in the Houses of Parliament. A nation in such a condition as that is never truly artistic. The artist with us, even now, is an exceptional product. Art for a long time in England had nothing at all to do with the life of the people. It was a luxury for the rich, a curious thing for ladies' and gentlemen's consump- tion, as purely artificial as the stuccoed Italian villa in which they insisted on shivering in our 1 86 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. chilly climate. And the pictures it produced were wholly alien to the popular wants and the popular feelings; they were part of an imported French, Italian, and Flemish tradition. English art has only slowly outgrown this stage, just in proportion as truly artistic handicrafts have sprung up here and there, and developed themselves among us. Go into the Cantagalli or the Ginori potteries at Florence, and you will see mere boys and girls, untrained children of the people, positively dis- porting themselves, with childish glee, in painting plates and vases. You will see them, not slavishly copying a given design of the master's, but letting their fancy run riot in lithe curves and lines, in griffons and dragons and floral twists-and-twirls of playful extravagance. They revel in ornament. Now, it is out of the loins of people like these that great artists spring by nature — not State- taught, artificial, made-up artists, but the real spontaneous product, the Lippi and Botticelli, the hereditary craftsmen, the born painters. And in England nowadays it is a significant fact that a large proportion of the truest artists — the inno- vators, the men who are working out a new style of English art for themselves, in accordance with ANENT ART PRODUCTION. 187 the underlying genius of the British temperament, have sprung from the great industrial towns — Birmingham, Manchester, Leicester — where artistic handicrafts are now once more renascent, I won't expose myself to further ridicule by repeating here (what I nevertheless would firmly believe, were it not for the scoffers) that a large proportion of them are of Celtic descent — belong, in other words, CO that section of the complex British nationality in which the noble traditions of deco- rative art never wholly died out — that section which was never altogether enslaved and degraded by the levelling and cramping and soul-destroying influences of manufacturing industrialism. In Italy, art is endemic. In Eugiand, in spite of all we have done to stimulate it of late years with guano and other artificial manures, it is still sporadic. The case of nmsic affords us an apt parallel. Till very lately, I believe, our musical talent in Britain came almost entirely from the cathedral towns. And why ? Because there, and there alone, till quite a recent date, there existed a hereditary school of music, a training of musicians from generation to generation among the mass f88 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. of the people. Not only were the cathedral services thenisulves a constant school of taste in music, but successive generations of choristers and organists gave rise to something like a musical caste in our episcopal centres. It is true, our vocalists have always come mainly from Wales, from the Scotch Highlands, from Yorkshire, from Ireland. But for that there is, I believe, a suffi- cient physical reason. For these are clearly the most mountainous parts of the United Kingdom; and the clear mountain air seems to produce on the average a better type of human larynx than the mists of the level. The men of the lowland, say the Tyrolese, croak like frogs in their marshes ; but the men of the upland sing like nightingales on their tree-tops. And indeed, it would seem as if the mountain people were always calling to one another across intervening valleys, always singing and whistling and shouting over their work in a way that gives tone to the whole vocal mechanism. Witness Welsh penillion singing. And wherever this fine physical endow- ment goes hand in hand with a delicate ear and a poetic temperament, you get your great vocalist, your Sims Reeves or your Patti. But in England ANENT ART PRODUCTION. 189 proper it was only in the cathedral towns that music was a living reality to the people; and it was in the cathedral towns, accordinfdv, durinf^ the dark ages of art, that exceptional musical ability was most likely to show itself. More particularly was this so on the Welsh border, where the two favouring influences of race and practice coincided — at Gloucester, Worcester, Hereford, long known for the most musical towns in England. Cause and effect act and react. Art is a pro- duct of the artistic temperament. The artistic temperament is a product of the long hereditary cultivation of art. And where a broad basis of this temperament exists among the people, owing to intermixture of artistically-minded stocks, one is liable to get from time to time that peculiar com- bination of characteristics— sensuous, intellectual, spiritual — which results in the highest and truest artist. XXlll. A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA. You ask me what would be the position of women in an ideal community. Well, after dinner, imagi- nation may take free flight. Suppose, till the coffee comes, we discuss that question. Woman, I take it, differs from man in being the sex Siicrificed to reproductive necessities. Whenever I say this, I notice my good friends, the women's-rights women, with whom I am gener- ally in pretty close accord, look annoyed and hurt. I can never imagine why. I regard this point as an original inequality of nature, which it should be the duty of human society to redress as far as possible, like all other inequalities. Women are not on the average as tall as men ; nor can they lift as heavy weights, or undergo, as a rule, so much physical labour. Yet civilised society recognises their equal right to the protec- tion of our policemen, and endeavours to neutralise I go A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA. 191 their physical inequality by the collective guaran- tee of all the citizens. In the same way I hold that women in the lump have a certain disadvan- tage laid upon them by nature, in the necessity that some or most among them should bear children; and this disadvantage I think the men in a well-ordered State would do their best to compensate by corresponding privileges. If women endure on our behalf the great public burden of providing future citizens for the community, the least we can do for them in return is to render that burden as honourable and as little onerous as possible. I can never see that there is any- thing unchivalrous in frankly admitting these facts of nature ; on the contrary, it seems to me the highest possible chivalry to recognise in woman, as woman, high or low, rich or poor, the potential mother, who has infinite claims on that ground alone to our respect and sympathy. Nor do I mean to deny, either, that the right to be a mother is a sacred and peculiar privilege of women. In a well-ordered community, I believe, that privilege will be valued high, and will be denied to no fitting mother by any man. While maternity is from one point of view a painful 192 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. duty, a burden imposed upon a single sex for the good of the whole, it is from another point of view a privilege and a joy, and from a third point of view the natural fulfilment of a woman's own instincts, the complement of her personality, the healthy exercise of her normal functions. Just as in turn the man's part in providing physically for the support of the woman and the children is from one point of view a burden imposed upon him, but from another point of view a precious privilege of fatherhood, and from a third point of view the proper outlet for his own energy and his own faculties. In an ideal State, then, I take it, almost every woman would be a mother, and almost every woman a mother of not more than about four children. An average of something like four is necessary, we know, to keep up population, and to allow for infant mortality, inevitable celibates, and so forth. Few women in such a State would abstain from maternity, save those who felt them- selves physically or morally unfitted for the task ; for in proportion as they abstained, either the State must lack citizens to carry on its life, or an extra and undue burden would have to be cast A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA. 193 upon some other woman. And it may well be doubted whether in a well-ordered and civilised State any one woman could adequately bear, bring up, and superintend the education of more than four young citizens. Hence we may con- clude that while no woman save the unfit would voluntarily shirk the duties and privileges of maternity, few (if any) women would make them- selves mothers of more than four children. Four would doubtless grow to be regarded in such a community as the moral maximum; while it is even possible that improved sanitation, by diminishing infant mortality and adult ineffective- ness, might make a maximum of three sufficient to keep up the normal strength of the popu- lation. In an ideal community, again, the woman who looked forward to this great task on behalf of the race would strenuously prepare herself for it beforehand from childhood upward. She would not be ashamed of such preparation; on the contrary, she would be proud of it. Her duty would be no longer " to suckle fools and chronicle small beer," but to produce and bring up strong, vigorous, free, able, and intelligent citizens. There- N T94 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. fore, she must be nobly educated for her great and important function — educated physically, in- tellectually, morally. Let us forecast her future. She will be well clad in clothes that allow of lithe and even development of the body ; she will be taught to run, to play games, to dance, to swim ; she will be supple and healthy, finely moulded and knit in limb and organ, beautiful in face and features, splendid and graceful in the native curves of her lissom figure. No cramping conventions will be allowed to cage her ; no worn- out moralities will be tied round her neck like a mill-stone to hamper her. Intellectually she will be developed to the highest pitch of which in each individual case she proves herself capable — educated, not in the futile linguistic studies which have already been tried and found wanting for men, but in realities and existences, in the truths of life, in recognition of her own and our place among immensities. She will know some- thing worth knowing of the world she lives in, its past and its present, the material of which it is made, the forces that inform it, the energies that thrill through it. Something, too, of the orbs that surround it, of the sun that lights it, A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA. 195 of the stars that gleam upon it, of the seasons that govern it. Something of the plants and herbs that clothe it, of the infinite tribes of beast and bird that dwell upon it. Something of the human body, its structure and functions, the human soul, its origin and meaning. Something of human societies in the past, of institutions and laws, of creeds and ideas, of the birth of civilisation, of progress and evolution. Some- thing, too, of the triumphs of art, of sculpture and painting, of the literature and the poetry of all races and ages. Her mind will be stored with the best thoughts of the thinkers. Morally, she will be free ; her emotional development, instead of being narrowly checked and curbed, will have been fostered and directed. She will have a heart to love, and be neither ashamed nor afraid of it. Thus nurtured and trained, she will be a fit mate for a free man, a fit mother for free children, a fit citizen for a free and equal community. Her life, too, will be her own. She will know no law but her higher instincts. No man will be able to buy or to cajole her. And in order that she may possess this freedom to perfection. 196 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. that she may be no husband's slave, no father's obedient and trembling daughter, I can see but one way : the whole body of men in common must support in perfect liberty the whole body of women. The collective guarantee must protect them against individual tyranny. Thus only can women be safe from the bribery of the rich husband, from the dictation of the father from whom there are " expectations." In the ideal State, I take it, every woman will be absolutely at liberty to dispose of herself as she will, and no man will be able to command or to purchase her, to influence her in any way, save by pure inclination. In such a State, most women would naturally desire to be mothers. Being healthy, strong, and free, they would wish to realise the utmost poten- tialities of their own organisms. And when they had done their duty as mothers, they would not care much, I imagine, for any further outlets for their superfluous energy. I don't doubt they would gratify to the full their artistic sensibilities and their thirst for knowledge. They would also perform their duties to the State as citizens, no less than the men. But having done these things A GLIMPSE INTO UTOPIA. 197 I fancy they would have done enough : the margin of their life would be devoted to dignified and cultivated leisure. They would leave to men the tilling of the soil, the building and navigation of marine or aerial ships, the working of mines and metals, the erection of houses, the construction of roads, railways, and communications, perhaps even the entire manufacturing work of the com- munity. Medicine and the care of the sick mi^ht still be a charge to some ; education to most ; art, in one form or another, to almost all. But the hard work of the world might well be left to men, upon whom it more naturally and fitly devolves. No hateful drudgery of "earning a livelihood." Women might rest content with being free and beautiful, cultivated and artistic, good citizens to the State, the mothers and guarditms of the coming generations. If any woman asks more than this, she is really asking less— for she is asking that a heavier burden should be cast on some or most of her sex, in order to relieve the minority of a duty which to well-organised women ought to be a privilege. "But all this has no practical bearing!" I beg your pardon. An ideal lias often two prac- 198 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. tical uses. In the first place, it gives us a pattern towards which we may approximate. In the second place, it gives us a standard by which we may judge whether any step we propose to take is a step forward or a step backward. XXIV. OF SECOND CHAMBERS. A Second Chamber acts as a drag. Progress is always uphill work. So we are at pains to pro- vide a drag beforehand — for an uphill journey. There, in one word, you have the whole philo- sophy of Second Chambers. How, then, did the nations of Europe come to hamper their legislative systems with such a useless, such an illogical adjunct ? In sackcloth and ashes, let us confess the truth — we English led them astray : on us the shame ; to us the dishonour. Theorists, indeed (wise after the fact, as is the wont of theorists), have discovered or in- vented an imaginary function for Second Chambers. They are to preserve the people, it seems, from the fatal consequences of their own precipitancy. As though the people — you and I — the vast body of citizens, were a sort of foolish children, to be classed with infants, women, criminals, and im- 199 200 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. beciles (I adopt the chivalrous phraseology of an Act of Parliament), incapable of knowing their own minds for two minutes together, and requiring to be kept straight by the fatherly intervention of Dukes of Marlborough or Marquises of Ailesbury. The ideal picture of the level-headed peers restrain- ing the youthful impetuosity of the representa- tives of the people from committing to-day some rash act which they would gladly repent and repeal to-morrow, is both touching and edifying. But it exists only in the minds of the philosophers, who find a reason for everything just because it is there. Members of Parliament, 1 have observed, seem to know their own minds every inch as well as earls — nay, even as marquises. The plain fact of the matter is, all the Second Chambers in the world are directly modelled upon the House of Lords, that Old Man of the Sea whom England, the weary Titan, is now striving so hard to shake off her shoulders. The mother of Parlia- ments is responsible for every one of them. Senates and Upper Houses are just the result of irrational Anglomania. When constitutional government began to exist, men turned unani- mously to the English Constitution as their model OF SECOND CHAMBERS. 201 and pattern. That was perfectly natural. Evolu- tionists know that evolution never proceeds on any other plan than by reproduction, with modification, of existing structures. America led the way. She said, " England has a House of Commons ; there- fore we must have a House of Representatives. England has also a House of Lords ; nature has not dowered us with those exalted products, but we will do what we can ; we will imitate it by a Senate." Monarchical France followed her lead ; so did Belgium, Italy, civilisation in general. I believe even Japan rejoices to-day in the august dignity of a Second Chamber. But mark now the irony of it. They all of them did this thing to be entirely English. And just about the time when they had completed the installation of their peers or their senators, England, who set the fashion, began to discover in turn she could manage a great deal better herself without them. And then what do the philosophers do ? Why, they prove to you the necessity of a Second Chamber by pointing to the fact that all civilised nations have got one — in imitation of England. Furthermore, it being their way to hunt up ab- struse and recondite reasons for what is on the 202 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. face of it ridiculous, they argue that a Second Chamber is a necessary wheel in the mechanism of popular representative government. A foolish phrase, which has come down to us from antiquity, represents the populace as inevitably " fickle," a changeable mob, to be restrained by the wisdom of the seniors and optimates. As a matter of fact, the populace is never anything of the sort. It is dogged, slow, conservative, hard to move ; it advances step by step, a patient, sure-footed beast of burden ; and when once it has done a thing, it never goes back upon it. I believe this silly fiction of the "fickleness" of the mob is mainly due to the equally silly fictions of preju- diced Greek oligarchs about the Athenian assembly — which was an assembly of well-to-do and culti- vated slave-owners. I do not swallow all that Thucydides chooses to tell us in his one-sided caricature about Cleon's appointment to the com- mand at Sphacteria, or about the affair of Mity- lene ; and even if I did, I think it has nothing to do with the question. But on such utterly exploded old-world ideas is the whole modern argument of the Second Chamber founded. Does anybody really believe great nations are OF SECOND CHAMBERS. 203 so incapable of managing their own affairs for themselves through their duly -elected represen- tatives that they are compelled to check their own boyish ardour by means of the acts of an irre- sponsible and non-elective body ? Does anybody believe that the House of Commons works too fast, and gets through its public business too hurriedly ? Does anybody believe we improve things in England at such a break-neck pace that we require the assistance of Lord Salisbury and Lord St. Leonards to prevent us from rushing straight down a steep place into the sea, like the swine of Gadara ? If they do, I congratuhte them on their psychological acumen and their political wisdom. What the Commons want is not a drag, but a goad — nay, rather, a snow-plough. No ; the plain truth of the matter is this : all the Second Chambers in the world owe their exis- tence, not to any deliberate plan or reason, but to the mere accident that the British nobles, not having a room big enough to sit in with the Com- mons, took to sitting separately, and transacted their own business as a distinct assembly. With so much wisdom are the kingdoms of the earth 204 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. governed ! How else could any one in his senses have devised the idea of creating one deliberative body on purpose to mutilate or destroy the work of another ? to produce from time to time a peri- odical crisis or a periodical deadlock ? There is not a country in the world with a Second Chamber that doesn't twice a year kick and plunge to get rid of it. The House of Lords was once a reality. It con- sisted of the ecclesiastical hierarchy — the bishops and mitred abbots ; with the official liierarchy — the great nobles, who were also great satraps of pro- vinces, and great military commanders. It was thus mainly made up of practical life-members, appointed by merit. The peers, lay and spiritual, were the men who commended themselves to the sovereign as able administrators. Gradually, with prolonged peace, the hereditary element choked and swamped the nominated element. The abbots disappeared, the lords multiplied. The peer ceased to be the leader of a shire, and sank into a mere idle landowner. Wealth alone grew at last to be a title to the peerage. The House of Lords became a House of Landlords. And the Eng- lish people submitted to the claim of irresponsible OF SECOND CHAMBERS. 205 wealth or irresponsible acres to exercise a veto upon national legislation. The anomaly, utterly- indefensible in itself, had grown up so slowly that the public accepted it — nay, even defended it. And other countries, accustomed to regard Eng- land — the Pecksnift among nations — as a perfect model of political wisdom, swallowed half the anomaly, and all the casuistical reasoning that was supposed to justify it, without a murmur. But if we strip the facts bare from the glamour that surrounds them, the plain truth is this — England allows an assembly of hereditary nobodies to retard or veto its legislation nowadays, simply because it never noticed the moment when a practical House of administrative officers lapsed into a nest of plutocrats. Mend or end ? As it stands, the thing is a not-even-picturesque mediaeval relic. If we English were logical, we would arrange that any man who owned so many thousand acres of land, or brewed so many million bottles of beer per annum, should ipso facto be elevated to the peerage. Why should not gallons of gin confer an earldom direct, and Brighton A's be equivalent to a mar- quisate? Why not allow the equal claim of 2o6 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. screws and pills with coal and iron ? Why dis- regard the native worth of annatto and nitrates ? Baron Beecham or Lord Sunlight is a first-rate name. As it is, we make petty and puerile distinctions. Beer is in, but whiskey is out; and even in beer itself, if I recollect aright, Dublin stout wore a coronet for some months or years before English pale ale attained the dignity of a barony. No Minister has yet made chocolate a viscount. At present, banks and minerals go in as of right, while soap is left out in the cold, and even cotton languishes. If the Chancellor of the Exchequer t up titles to auction, while abolishing the legislative function of the Lords, there would be millions in it. But as we English are not logical, our mending would probably re- solve itself into fatuous tinkering. We might get rid of the sons, but leave the fathers. We might flood the Lords with life peers, but leave the veto. Such tactics are too Britannic. '' Stone dead hath no fellow ! " XXV. A POINT OF CRITICISM. A FEW pa^es back, I ventured to remark that in Utopia or the Millennium the women of the com- munity would probably be supported in common by the labour of the men, and so be secured com- plete independence of choice and action. When these essays first appeared in a daily newspaper, a Leader among Women wrote to me in reply, "What a paradise you open up to us! Alas for the reality ! The question is — could women ever be really independent if men supplied the means of existence ? They would always feel they had the right to control us. The difference of the position of a woman in marriage when she has got a little fortune of her own is something miraculous. Men adore money, and the possession of it inspires them with an involuntary respect for the happy possessor." Now I got a great many letters in answer to 207 2o8 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. these Post-Prandials as they originally came out — some of them, strange to say, not wholly com- plimentary. As a rule, I am too busy a man to answer letters : and I take this opportunity of apologising to correspondents who write to tell me I am a knave or a fool, for not having acknow- ledged direct their courteous communications. But this friendly criticism seems to call for a reply, because it involves a question of principle which I have often noted in all discussions of Utopias and Millennia, For my generous critic seems to take it for granted that women are not now dependent on the labour of men for their support — that some, or even most of them, are in a position of freedom. The plain truth of it is — almost all women depend for everything upon one man, who is cr may be an absolute despot. A very small .lumber of women have " money of their own," as we quaintly phrase it — that is to say, are supported by the labour of many among us, either in the form of rent or in the form of interest on capital be- queathed to them. A woman with five thousand a year from Consols, for example, is in the strictest sense supported by the united labour of all of A POINT OF CRITICISM. 209 us — she faps a first mortgage to that amount upon the earnings of the community. You and I are taxed to pay her. But is she therefore more dependent than the woman who lives upon what she can get out of the scanty earnings of a drunken husband ? Does the community therefore think it has a right to control her? Not a bit of it. She is in point of fact the only free woman among us. My dream was to see all women equally free— inheritors from the community of so much of its earnings ; holders, as it were, of sufficient world-consols to secure their indepen- dence. That, however, is not the main point to which I desire just now to direct attention. I want rather to suggest an underlying fallacy of all so- called individualists in dealing with schemes of so-called Socialism — for to me your Socialist is the true and only individualist. My correspon- dent's argument is written from the standpoint of the class in which women have or may have money. But most women have none ; and schemes of reconstruction must be for the benefit of the many. So-called individualists seem to think that under a more organised social state they would 2IO POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. not be so able to buy pictures as at present, not so free to run across to California or Kamschatka. I doubt their premiss, for I believe we should all of us be better off than we are to-day; but let that pass ; 'tis a detail. The main thing is thir. : they forget that most of us are narrowly tied and circumscribed at present by endless monopolies and endless restrictions of land or capital. I should like to buy pictures ; but I can't afford them. I long to see Japan; but I shall never get there. The man in the street may desire to till the ground : every acre is appropriated. He may wish to dig coal: Lord Masham prevents him. He may have a pretty taste in Venetian glass : the flints on the shore are private property; the furnace and the implements belong to a capitalist. Under the existing regime, the vast mass of us are hampered at every step in order that a few may enjoy huge monopolies. Most men have no land, so that one man may own a county. And they call this Individualism ! In considering any proposed change, whether imminent or distant, in practice or in day-dream, it is not fair to take as your standard of refer- ence the most highly-favoured individuals under A POINT OF CRITICISM. 211 existing conditions. Nor is it fair to take the most unfortunate only. You should look at the average. Now the average man, in the world as it wags, is a farm-labourer, an artisan, a mill-hand, a navvy. He has untrammelled freedom of con- tract to follow the plough on another man's land, or to work twelve hours a day in another man's factory, for that other man's benefit — provided always he can only induce the other man to employ him. If he can't, he is at perfect liberty to tramp the high road till he drops with fatigue, or to starve, unhindered, on the Thames Embank- ment. He may live where he likes, as far as his means permit; for example, in a convenient court off Seven Dials. He may make his own free bargain with grasping landlord or exacting sweater. He may walk over every inch of English soil, with the trifling exception of the millions of acres where trespassers will be prosecuted. Even travel is not denied him: Florence and Venice are out of his beat, it is true ; but if he saves up his loose cash for a couple of months, he may revel in the Oriental luxury of a third- class excursion train to Brighton and back for 212 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. three shillings. Such advantages does the regime of landlord-made individualism afford to the aver- age run of British citizen. If he fails in the race, he may retire at seventy to the ease and comfort of the Union workhouse, and be buried inexpensively at the cost of his parish. The average woman in turn is the wife of such a man, dependent upon him for what fraction of his earnings she can save from the public-house. Or she is a shop-girl, free to stand all day from eight in the morning till ten at night behind a counter, and to throw up her situation if it doesn't suit her. Or she is a domestic servant, enjoying the glorious liberty of a Sunday out every second week, and a walk with her young man every alternate Wednesday after eight in the evening. She has full leave to do her love- making in the open street, and to get as wet as she chooses in Regent's Park on rainy nights in November. Look the question in the face, and you will see for yourself that the mass of mothers in every community are dependent for support, not upon men in general, but upon a single man, their husband, against whose caprices and despotism they have no sort of protection. A POINT OF CRITICISM. 213 Even the few women who are, as we say, " in- dependent," how are they supported, save by the labour of many men who work to keep them in comfort or luxury ? They are landowners, let us put it; and then they are supported by the labour of their farmers and ploughmen. Or they hold North- Western shares ; and then they are supported by the labour of colliers, and stokers, and guards, and engine-drivers. And so on throughout. The plain fact is, either a woman must earn her own livelihood by work, which, in the case of the mothers in a community, is bad public policy; or else she must be supported by a man or men, her husband, or her labourers. My day-dream was, then, to make every woman independent, in precisely the same sense that women of property are independent at present. Would it give them a consciousness of being unduly controlled if they derived their support from the general funds of the body politic, of which they would be free and equal members and voters ? Well, look at similar cases in our own England. The Dukes of Marlborough derive a heavy pension from the taxes of the country ; but I have never observed that anv Duke of Marl- 214 POST-PRANDIAL PHILOSOPHY. borough of my time felt himself a slave to the imperious taxpayer. Mr Alfred Russel Wallace is justly the recipient of a Civil List annuity ; but that hasn't prevented his active and essentially individualist brain from inventing Land National- isation. Mr. Robert Buchanan very rightly draws another such annuity for good work done ; but Mr. Buchanan's name is not quite the first that rises naturally to my lips as an example of cowed and cringing sycophancy to the ideas and ideals of his fellow-citizens. No, no; be sure of it, this terror is a phantom. One master is real, realisable, instant ; but to be dependent upon ten million is just what we always describe as inde- pendence. THE END. PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE, HANSON AND CO. EDINBURGH AND LONDON. GRANT ALLEN'S NOVELS. PHILISTIA. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. "A very clever, well-written novel, full of freshness and originalltv."— ^/. James's Gazette. STRANGE STORIES. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, with Frontispiece by George Du Maurikk, 6s. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. "One and all, the stories are told with a delightful ease and with an abundance of lively humour." — AthcncEuvi. BABYLON. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, with 12 Illustrations by P. Macnab, 3s. 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s, "The book justifies itself amply. It is fresh, entertaining, and pleasant from beginning to end."— /^«// Mall Gazette. FOR MAIMIE'S SAKE : A Tale of Love and Dynamite. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. "This is a very remarkable book. Maimie is essentially human, intensely womanly, and there is something so bewitching in her childish ignorance, some- thing so innocent in her wickedness, that we can understand her friends' and her lovers' infatuation for her. . . . There is not a character in the book which fails to interest us, and the writing is, of its kind, faultless." — Times. IN ALL SHADES. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2S. "'In all Shades' will be devoured with zest by the most jaded readers of fiction. . . . The author's vivid pictures are faithful as well as glowing."— Morning Post. THE BECKONING HAND. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, with Frontispiece by Townley Green, 6s. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. " Grant Allen has already proved himself to be a story-teller of the first class. He has rare freshness and originality, combined with a characteristic cleverness, which we cannot well define. . . . There is an irresistible attraction in the style of these stories to which even the most cynical must succumb. For railway reading no volume equals it." — Perthshire Advertiser. THE DEVIL'S DIE. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s, 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. " Mr. Grant Allen's powerful and interesting novel. . . . The story has a strong interest, which is started soon and kept at good speed till the end. It deserves more than an ordinary measure of success." — Scotsvtan. THIS MORTAL COIL. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, 2s. " Mr. Grant Allen never fails to interest the reader. He is a careful student of human nature, and always puts before us a piece of individual portraiture. . . . There is plenty of brilliant writing in the book, and a wealth of ingenious incident. ' ' — Manchester Guardian. GRANT ALLEN'S NOWELS—coHfinucd. THE TENTS OF SHEM. Crown Svo, cloth extra, with a Frontispiece by E. F. Bkkwtnall, 3s. 6d. ; post Svo, illustrated boards, as. "The book is one of the freshest, most enjoyable, and cleverest stories that liavt! a))pcarctl during llie pitisciit .season. ... A book to be read breathlessly, and remembered with jileMsure." — Hcottiah Leader. THE GREAT TABOO. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. "Mr. (irant Allen certainly proves that in the writinj; of a 'creepy' ni)vel he can shake even the au.i;niit throne of Mr. Rider Haggard. Not .1 p.age Imt is alive with breathless interest. . . . ' The Great Taboo ' must rank as one of the best and most telling pieces of literature Mr. Grant Allen has produced." — Scottish Leader. DUMARESQ'S DAUGHTER. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post Svo, illustrated boards, 2s. "Mr. Grant Allen has gone out of the usual range of the novelist to find his fascinating heroine Psyche, who is .always a sympathetic figure. The author's descriptions of Al:.4iers and its surnauidings are delightful, and m;ike a charming frame for the happy climax to Psyche's love-.story." — Morning Post. THE DUCHESS OF POWYSLAND. Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post Svo, illustrated boards, 2s. "Mr. Grant Allen could hardly write a dull novel if he tried; certainly the 'Duche-s'is not dull. The story abounds in interesting people. Mr. Grant Allen has clearly added another to his many successes." — Academy. BLOOD ROYAL. Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. ; post Svo, illustrated boards, 2s. " Decidedly a clever novel — brief, brisk, and yet full of picturesque descrip- tions, and by no means lacking in epigrammatic force .and humour. . . . The girl-heroine of the book is positively bewitching." — Leeds Mercury. DR. PALLISER'S PATIENT. Fcap. Svo, cloth extra, is. 6d. " Not only admir.able in conception, but more than usually interesting as a piece of ' light ' reading." — Evening Neivs. IVAN GREET'S MASTERPIECE, &c. With a Frontispiece by Stanley L. Wood. Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d. " They range through the whole gamut of tragedy, comedy, and serio-comedy. They are full of good work, and most of them intensely readable. Mr. Grant Allen's stories 'palpitate with actuality.' He holds us as surely as did the Ancient Mariner — more surely, for it is not only 'one of three,' but the whole three that he draws from the hum of life io listen to his fa.-cinating How (jf narrative. . . . On the whole it is an admirable collection." — IVesttnitister Gazette. THE SCALLYWAG. With 24 Illustrations by Jacomb Hood, Crown Svo, cloth e.xtra, 3s. 6d. "Clear character-sketching, bright dialogue, and a hundred clever hits at topics of the day, will make the time spent in its perusal pass pleasantly enough." — Speaker. LONDON : CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY. (Feb , !?r4. CHATTO & V^INDUS 214, Piccadilly, London, W. OMOND About. ABOUT.— THE FELLAH: An Egyptian Novel. By Komo> Translated by Sir Randal Roherts. Post 8vo, illustrated boards, 'Jh. ADAMS (W: DAVENPdRtyrWORKS BY. A DICTIONARY OF THE DRAMA. Being a comprehensive Gnidc to the Plays Playwrights, Players, and Playhouses of the United Kingdom and America Crown 8vo half-bound, 12m. 4i>.*. 0<1. each ; post 8vo, illustrated boards, "^s. each. RED SPIDER. I E VE. BARR (ROBERT : LUKE SHARP), STORIES BY. Cr. 8vo, ci., 3n. «y W. A. Cha tto and J. Jack son. W ith 450 tint" Ilinsts. Lar.w .',10. hf.-bd., ',^5<»««. CHAUCER F0R~CHrLDRENTXGdden"Ke^T37Mr3. H. R. HA'\vErs: With 8 Coloured Plates and 30 Woodcuts. Small 4to, cloth extm, Itn. <>il. CHAUCER FOR SCHOOLS. By Mis. H. 1^. H.\w,:is. DcmySvo, clotii li'iip. *^«^<»«l, CLARE:-F0R THE" LOVE OF "A LASS : A Tale of Tynedale." By Austin Clare. Post 8vo, picture boards, 'Jin. ; doih I'lnp, '2m. <}«l. each ; po.= i Hvo, illustrated boards, *^s, p.Tcb. FROM MIDNIGHT TO MIDNIGHT. | BL.\GK3M1TH AND SCHOLAH. TRANSMIGRATION, j YOIMPLAY ME FALSE. | A VILLAGE COMEDY. Post Svo, illustrated boards. '2«. each. SWEET ANNE PAGE. | FIGHT WITH FORT UNE. 1 SWEET & TWEN TY. | FRANCES. COLLINS (WILKIE), NOVELS BY. Cr. 8vo, cl. ex., Itn. 6«l. each ; post 8vo, illust. bds., 2«. each ; cl. limp, *2m. Od. each. ANTONINA. With a Frontispiece by Sir John Gilbert, R.A. BASIL. Illustrated by Sir John Gilbert, R.A., and J. Mahoney. HIDE AND SEEK. Illustrated by Sir John Gilbert, R.A. , and J. Makonev, AFTER DARK. Illustrations by A. B. Houghton, j THE TWO DESTINIES. THE DEAD SECRET. With a Frontispiece by Sir John Gilbert, K,A, QUEEN OF HEARTS. With a Frontispiece by Sir John Gilbert, R.A. THE WOMAN IN WHITE. With Illusts. by Sir J. Gilbkrt, R.A.,and F. A. Fraslr. NO NAME. With Illustrations by Sir J. E. Mu.lai.s, K.A., and A. W, Cooper. MY MISCELLANIES. With a Str.el-plate Portrait of Wilkie Collins. ARMADALE. With Illustrations by G. H. Tho\!AS. THE MOONSTONE. With Illustrations by G, l)u MAURiKnaiid F. A. Fraser. MAN AND WIFE. With Illustrations by William Small. POOR MISS FINCH. Illustrated by G. Du Maurikr and Edward Hughes. MISS OR MRS.? With Illusts. by S. L. Fn.n^s, R.A., and Henry Woouh, A, R.A. THE NEW MAGDALEN. Illustrated by G. Du Maukikk and C. S. Reinhardt. THE FROZEN DEEP. Illustrated by G. Du Mauriek and J. Mahoney, THE LAW AND THE LADY. Illu.sts, by S. I.. Filuks, R.A., and SvDNEi' Hall. THE HAUNTED HOTEL. Illustr,-.t«'!*. Oil. each. THE LIFE OF GEORGE CRUIKSHANK. By Blanchard Jerrold. With 84 Illustrations and a Bibliography. Crown 8vo. cloth extra, 7b. Gti. CUMMINGIC. F. "GORDONX works by. Demy 8vo7^ ex., Ss. Od.^h^ IN THE HEBRIDES. With Autotype Facsimile and 23 Illustrations. IN THE HIMALAYAS AND ON THE INDIAN PLAINS. With 42 Illustrations. TWO HAPPY YEARS IN CEYLON. With 28 Illustrations. ___Y^*_99-^.?y_*'.y'..'^® EGYPT. With Photogravure Frontis. Dem y 8vo, cl., 7^. 4iiI.; pnst 8vo, illustrated boards, 'Zn, DERBY (THE).-THE~BLUE RIBBON OF THE TURF : A Chronidi of the Race for The Derby, from Piomea to Pjnovan. With Brief Accounts of The Oaks. By Louis Henry Curzon. Crow n 8vo, cloth li mp, iln . 4>«l. DERWENT (LETTH), NOVELIS BY. Cr.SvoTcl , :5«.««l. ea.; pos78vo.bds..««.ea. OUR LADY OP^TEARS^ ^1 CIRC E'S LOVERS. DICKENS (CHARLES), NOVELS BY. Post Svo. illustrated boards, a». each! SKETCHES BY BOZ. I NICHOLAS NICKLEBY. THE PICKWICK PAPERS. | OLIVER TWIST. THE SPEECHES OP CHARLES DICKENS, 1841-1870. With a NewBibllosraphy. Edited by Richard Herne Shepherd. Crown Svo, cloth extra, H»».— Also a Smaller Edition, in the Mavfair Library, post Svo, cloth limp, i2s. 4l. _ ^__ DONOVAN~(DICK), DETECTIVE STORIES BY. Post Svo. illustrated boards, t2.«i. each; cloth limp, *ii*, *>. <»tl. each. A SOCIAL DEPARTURE: How Orthodocia and I Went round the World by Our- selvrs. Willi in lUii'^trations bv F, H. Townsf.nd. AN AMERICAN GIRL IN LONDON. With 80 Illustrations by F. H. Townsf.np. THE SIMPLE ADVENTURES OF A ME MSAHIB. Illustrated by F. H. Townskno. A DAUGH TER O P TO-DA Y, two Vol's., crown 8v o. [Shoilly. DYER.— THE FOLK-LORE OF PLANTS. By Rev. T. F. Thiselton Dyer, M.A. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, Ga. FARLY ENGLISH POETS. Edited, with Introductions and Annota- *"* tions, by Rev. A. B.Grosart, D.D. Crown 8vo, cloth boards, ««. per Volume. FLETCHER'S (GILES) COMPLETE POEMS. One Vol. DAYIES' (SIR JOHN) COMPLETE POETICAL WORKS. Two Vols. HERRICK'S (ROBERT) COMPLETE COLLECTED POEMS. Three Vols. SIDNEY^S^IR PHILIP)^ COMPLETE^POETICAL WORKS. Three Vols. EDGCUMBE.— ZEPHYRUS : A Holiday in Brazil and on the River Plate. By E. R. Pearce EnocuMnE. With 41 Il lustra tions . Crow n 8vo, cloth ex tra, Hm.^ "EDWARDES (MRS. ANNIE>,"N0VELS~BY : A POINT OF HONOUR. Post 8vo, illustrated boards, Ss. ARCHIE LOYELL. Crown 8vo, cloth exU;a^JJs^«il. ; post Svo, illust, boards, '2h. EDWARDS"~(ELIEZER).-WORbS, FACTS, AND PHRASES : A Dictionary of Curious, Quaint, and Out-ot-the-Way Matters. By Eliezer Edwards. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 7h. <»«I. EDWARDS (MTbETHAM-), NOVEL"SBYr KITTY. Post Svo, illustrated boards, 'is. ; cloth limp, '^s. Cttl. FELICIA. Post Svo, illustrated boards, ^s. EGERTON.— SUSSEX FOLK & SUSSEX WAYS. By Rev.J. C. Egerton. With Intr oduction by Rev. Dr. H. Wage, and 4 Illustrations. C r. Svo, cloth ex., iin, EGG LEST()N~(ED WARD).— ROXY ; A Novd7~Post S^Tp, iui itTbds., 2s. ENGLISHMAN'S "HOUSE, THE: A Practical Guide to all intere.stcd in Selecting or Building a House; with Estimates of Cost, Quantities, &c. By C. J. Richardson. With Coloured Frontispiece and 600 Illusts. Cro wn Svo, cloth, 7>*. <»il. EWALD (ALEX~CHARLEST F.S. A.)r WOiSKS THE LIFE AND TIMES OP PRINCE CHARLES STUART, Count of Albany (The Young Pretender). Witli a Portrait. Crown Svo, cloth extra, ti*. ». EYES, OUR : How to Preserve Them from Infancy to Old Age. By Joh n Brow ning. F.R .A.S. With7o I llus tp. Eig hteenth Thousand. Crown S vo, J m. FAMILlARSHORT SAYINGS""OF GREATMEN. By Samuel Arthur B knt, A.m. Fifth Edition, Rev ise d and Knlarsied. Crown Svo, cloth extra, 7m. <>J^. technist's Tr easu ry. By Thoma s Ke ntish. With 267 lUustrationr. Cr. 8vo, cl., 5». FITZGERALD (PERCYrM.AT^F.SrAOrWORKS BY; THE WORLD BEHIND THE SCENES. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, 3«. 4mI. LITTLE ESSAYS: Passages trom Letters of Charles Lamb. Post «vo, ci., tin. 6«l. A DAY'S TOUR: Journey through France and Belgium. With Sketches. Cr. ito, ta, FATAL ZERO. Crown 8vo , cloth extra. «». 6«l. : post 8vo, illustrated boards, liu. Post 8vo, illustrfted boards, iis. each. BELLA DONNA. I LADY OP BRANTOME. I THE SECOND MRS. TILLOTSON. POLLY. I NEVER FORGOTTEN. I SEYENTY-FIYE BROOKE STREET, LIFE OF JAMES BOSWELL (of Auchinleck.i." With an Account ot liis Sayings, Doings, and Writings ; and Four Portraits. Two Vols., demy 8vo, cloth, iSiw. THE SAVOY OPERA. With numerous Illustrations and a Poi trait. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, Oh. [Shortlv. Flammarion (Camille), works by. '~ POPULAR ASTRONOMY : A General Description of ihc Heavens. Py Camille Flammarion. Translated by J. Ellard Gore, F.R, a. S. Withncailv ^co Illus- trations. Medium 8vo, cloth extra, l«s. [I'liparwf^. URANIA : A Romance. Translated by A. R. Stetson. With 87 lUubtrations by De Bieler, Mv rda ch, &c. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, .5m. FLETCHER'S (GILEO^D.rCOMPLETE~POEMSrChi^t¥viciorie in Heaven, Christ's Victorie on Earth, Christ's Triumph over Deatii, and Minor Poems. With Notes by Rev. A. B. Grosart, D.D. Crown 8vo, cloth boHids. i, iit\. each. FRERET^^XNDURANG HAFJ ; ^^rTM^oiTs of a Hindoo. With Pro- face by Sir Bartle Frere. Crown 8vo, cloth, Jis. Oil. ; post 8vo, ilhi'-.t. bds., iJf*. FRISW^LMHAIN). -ONE OF TWO : ANo'^eTrPost 8vo, iilust. bds. , 2s: FROST (THOMAS), WORKS BY. Crown s'vo. doth extra, ;««. iU\. each. CIRCUS LIFE AND CIRCUS CELEBRITIES. I LIVES OF THE CONJURERS. THE OLD SHOWMEN AND THE OLD LONDON FAIRS. FRY'S (HERBERT) ROYAL GUIDE TO THE LONDON CHARITIES. Showing their Name, Date ot Foundation, Objects, Income, OtliciaU, &c. J'^dittd by John Lane. Published Annually. Crown 8vo, cloth, l.«t. Ci!. HARDENING BOOKSr Post 8vo. tn. each ; cloth limp, %n. «cl. cacli."" " A YEAR'S WORK IN GARDEN AND GREENHOUSE. By George Gf.knny. HOUSEHOLD HORTICULTURE. Hv Tom and Iane Jerrold. Illustrated. THE GARDEN THAT PAID THE RENT. ByJIuM Jerrolu. OUR KITCHEN GARDEN. ByToM JEKuoLijr Crown Svo, cloth. Is. liil. MY GARDEN WILD._ By Franc, s G. Heath. Cio^n (Svo, cloth e\tr,i, «*. GARRETT.— THE "CAPEL GIRLS: A Novel. By Edward GAuiiETx: Crown 8vo, cloth evtra. W*. <»d.; pnst hvo. ilhistr.ited boards, tin. GAII LOT.— THE~RE D SHIRTST"Arst5Fy"8t"t li^Revol u tToir~iJy~PAiJ I Gaulot. Translated by J. A. J. dr Villiers. Crown Svo, cloth, :{s. <>«!. \Shoit!y, GENTLE1MN'F~M"AGAZINE,"THE. ls."Munihly"in~lidditToirTo Articles upon subjects in Literadire. Science, and Art, "TABLE TALK" by Svl- vanusUrban, and "PAGES on PLAYS" byJusriN II. AfcCARTHY, appear monthly. *,.* Rnuiii VnluDfH for rereiif Vfriy: kct>t in •^tnrlj, S'*. *. Od. G OODM AN7=THir FATE~1)F~HE R B ERt W AY N E. TBy~E.~j: G^od- MAN. Atithor of "Too Curious," Crown 8vo, cloth, '.im, Od. GOWING.-FIVE"THOUSAND~MILES IN A SLEDGETXMid^ner lourney Across Siberia. By Lionel F. Gowing. With 30 Illnslrations by C. J. Uren, a nd a M ap by E. W eller. Large crown 8vo, cloth extra, M«. GRAHAMT^^tHEnPROTESSOR'S~WIFET~ArStory By Leonard Graham. Fcap, 8vo. picture cover, Im. GREEKS~AND^ROMANS,~THE LIFE OF THE, descrrbed~f?3m Antique Monuments. By Ernst Guhl and W. Koner. Edited by Dr. F. Hueffer. With 545 Illustrations. Large crown 8vo, cloth extra, Ts. (ik Salamanca. Post 8vo. cloth limp. '^m. tiii. HANKY-PANKYT^Easyi'nck^Whrte Magic. sYeight^ofliairdr e Kev. A. B, Grosakt, D. D. ; Steel Portrait, &c. Th rro V^ols„ cro wn 8vo, cl. bds., I ^ w. HERTZKA.— FREELAND : A Social Anticipation.' "By Dr. Theodor Hrrtzka^ Translated by Arthur Ran som. Crown 8vo, cloth extra, Ow . HESSE-V^rAlTTEGGT^TUNIS niie Lancfali^ tho People. By Chevalier _ Ernst von IlKssF.-VVARTi-.r.ft. With 22 Illustrations. Cr. 8vo, cloth extra , .'N. 0*1. HILL (HEADdN).^ZAMBRA THE DETECTIVE. ByliiADON IIili.. Post 8vo. illus trated boards, !j». ; clot h, *2n, BELL BARRY, ^*i% iaj>i>.w.|n... 14 BOOKS PUBLISHED BY KNIGHT. — THE PATIENT'S VADE MECUM : How to Get Most benefit from Medical Advice, liy William Knight, M.K.C.S., and iiuwAKO Kn ioht, L.R.C .P. Crown 8vo, la. % cloth limp, Iw. . *. <>«l. each. FORENSIC ANEC DOTES. j THEATRICAL AN ECDOTE S. LEHMANN.— HARRY FLUDYER AT CAMBRTDGE. By R. C. Leh MANN. Post Svo, la.; cloth, la. 6«l. LEIGH (HENRY S.), WORKS BY. CAROLS OF COCKAYNE. Printed on hand-made paper, bound in buckram, !in, J EUX D'ESPRIT . Edited by Hknrv S. Leig h. Po st Svo, cloth limp, t^w. 0«l. LE YS (JOHN ).-THE LIND SAYS ; "Akomance. P os t 8vo,iTlust.bds. , 2s. LIFE IN LONDON; or, the History of Jerry Hawthorn and Cor- inthian Tom. With Cruikshank's Coloured Illustrations. Crown Svo, cloth extra, y a.