IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 7 
 
 .^i 
 
 /. 
 
 / 
 
 ^ 
 ^f.^ 
 
 
 13^ m 
 
 A 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 *-llll» IM 
 
 u 1^ 112,0 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 
 
 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 6" — 
 
 
 ► 
 
 V] 
 
 <^ 
 
 /J 
 
 ^;j 
 
 'c^l 
 
 ^B 
 
 ^> > 
 
 
 '^ 
 
 W 
 
 '/ 
 
 /A 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 §] 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notei/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 □ 
 
 n 
 
 G 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Cc 
 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur6e et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 I I Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 n Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. nutre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serrf e peui causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le Ic ng de la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omittbd from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas dt6 filmdes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires: 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a AtA possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduita, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mithode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 n Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommag6es 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages restaur6es et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxei 
 Pages d6color6es, tachetdes ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ditachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality in6gale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materia 
 Comprend du matdriei suppldmentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule 6dition disponibie 
 
 I I Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 I I Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I — I Only edition available/ 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been ref limed to 
 ensi|re the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une paiure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmdes d nouveau de fagon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 -y 
 
 / 
 
 10X 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film6 au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 7 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 aox 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grAce A la 
 g6n6rosit6 de: 
 
 BibliothAque nationale du Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contrict specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers aro filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shdil contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetd de l'exemplaire film6, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimde sont film6s en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont film^s en commen^ant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derniAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 dernidrv, image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole — »> signifie "A SUIVRE ". le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 film6s d des taux de reduction diffdrents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film6 d partir 
 de Tangle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 i i 2 3 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
l\ 
 
r 
 
 MESSIAH'S SECOND ADVENT 
 
 B Stu^^ in iE0cbatoIofl? 
 
 BY 
 
 CAIvVIN GOODSPEED, D.l.., I,L.D., 
 
 Pro/em>r of Si/Ktetiiatw Theology and Apologetics in 
 McManter University, Toronto, Ont. 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 «* m ■■- 
 
 TORONTO 
 
 WILLIAM BRIGGS 
 
 1900 
 
AgricuUure, ' ' *'■"" """""'■''l"'. " the Ue,.urt,„i.„t ot 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 ie year 
 iient of 
 
 I WISH especially to aeknowlo(l<re my obUcra- 
 tion to Dr. David Brown's work, entitled " The 
 Second Advent." It is but just to myself to 
 state, however, that I had formed the general 
 plan of my treatment, and had published an 
 outline of the argument, before it was my pi-ivi- 
 lege to consult his masterly treatise. 
 
 C. G. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 (IIAI IKil 
 
 Intr()(lucti<»ni .... 
 I. The KoHurrectioii (»f tho Dead 
 II. Tho Geneml Judgment . 
 
 III. The Views Compared 
 
 IV. No Probation After Christ Comes 
 V. Rev. 20 : 4-(;, and Resurrection from tijo Dea 
 
 VI. The Kingdom 
 VII. The Kingdoin~{C(>ntiniie(l) 
 VIII. The Kmgdom—{Cnnd>ided) . 
 IX. The Ever-Imminent Coming of Our Lord 
 X. The Ever-Imminent Coming of Our Lord 
 {Condinled) ..... 
 XL Tho Power of His Coming 
 XII. Tho Ljist Day 
 
 X in. The Progress of the Go-spol . 
 
 XIV. The Millennium 
 
 XV. Some Evils of Pro-millennialism . 
 Index to Scripture Texts 
 
 PAOK 
 
 . 7 
 
 - 10 
 
 . 11 
 
 27 
 
 . 28 
 
 43 
 
 44 
 
 - 48 
 
 40 
 
 58 
 
 d 50- 
 
 - ?)0 
 
 . 01- 
 
 100 
 
 . 101- 
 
 111 
 
 . 112- 
 
 138 
 
 . 130-172 
 
 . 173 
 
 200 
 
 . 201 
 
 210 
 
 . 211- 
 
 210 
 
 . 220 252 
 
 . 253-264 
 
 . 265-284 
 
 . 285-288 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 TiiKUE is to bo a period duiing which righteousness 
 is to ])revail on the earth as never before, and called 
 the Millennium because spoken of in llev. 20: 4-0 as 
 continuing for a thousand years. Our Lord is to 
 come in p(!rson a second time to the world, in close 
 connection with this transcendent era in the history 
 of tlie Church. 
 
 These statements are accepted by the whole Cliris- 
 tian world with but few exceptions. There is great 
 diversity of opinion, however, as to the nature and 
 duration of the millennial period, and Christendom is 
 sharply divided on the (juestion of the relation of our 
 Lord's second coming to this grand epoch. Pre-mil- 
 lennialists believe that He is to come before the 
 millennium to usher it in by the assertion of His per- 
 sonal power, and to reign with His people on the 
 earth until its close. Post-millennialists hold that He 
 is not to appear until the close of this period, when 
 He will come in connection with the tremendous 
 scenes of the " resurrection of the just and unjust," 
 and to "judge quick and dead." 
 
 Pre-millennialists generally have a very profound 
 
 7 
 
8 
 
 INTItoDircTION. 
 
 conviction of the importance of tlu'ir Hpocial view iifl 
 to tl»e coiiiin;^ of tlic lionl, and pn'ss it with ;^r«'at 
 onor^jjy ami |)erHist(a»cy. It is nuuie a chief .suhject of 
 tlieir preaching from the pulpit and of toHtimony in 
 social H«»rviceH. (ireat conferenceH are held, year after 
 year, in wliich the beHt talent ainon;; them is laid 
 under contrihution to press it with mi«;ht :in<l main. 
 Institutions are maintained in which this hclief is the 
 central feature of the teachin<^. A superabundant 
 literature is hcin^ scattered everywhere — throu^jh the 
 mails, hy travelling agents, from door to door, and in 
 other ways. In churches, however few there be who 
 hold the pre-milleiuiial view, they feel not only at 
 liberty, but under obligation, to press it upon the 
 attention of those who do not share it with them. 
 
 On the other hand, Post-millennialists do not feel 
 called upon to give their view special emphasis in 
 preaching or testimony. Indeed, they are tempted to 
 give the whole subject of the second coming of our 
 Lord less attention than it deserves, because of the 
 over-emphasis they conceive is given it by their pro- 
 millennial brethren; much less are there conventions 
 and other general means for pressing the post-millen- 
 nial view and combating the opposing one. Neither 
 is there an abundant literature on this side of the 
 subject to be scattered broadcast, even were any dis- 
 posed to take the trouble. Those who wish to secure 
 something on the post-millennial side of the question, 
 so far from having it thrust upon them, find it diffi- 
 cult to obtain it when sought for. Thus Christian 
 people are at the mercy, so to speak, of our pre-mil- 
 
INTHODrcTloV. 
 
 
 
 I 
 
 Ifiiniiil rrinuI.M, except oh they are able, unaided, to 
 resist the champions of the pre-iiiiMeimial view liy 
 an in(l»'pen<hMit stiidy ol* tlie Word of (iod. The silence 
 of Post-inilienniaHsts is really Ix'in;^ niisco!istrue<l. It 
 is hein;; whispered tlmt little is said and spoken on 
 their side of the subject because they are conscious 
 that they have no valid argun»entH in support of their 
 view. 
 
 Und • these circunistancos it is little wonder that 
 the pre-millt'rniial view has made considerable pm- 
 ;jress. It is really surprisin;^ that a larj^er proportion 
 of Christians have not accepted it. Unless, therefore, 
 we ref^ard the issue between the pre- and post-millen- 
 nial views as of so little moment that it is a matter of 
 practical indifference which is held, it is hi^^h time 
 the (/hristian public were put in possession of a clear 
 and candid statement of the grounds of the post- mil- 
 lennial belief. As I proceed! hope to make it plain 
 that this issue is not an unimportant one ; but that 
 the pre-millennial view involves a whole system of 
 interpretation, a distinct conception of the nature of 
 Christ's kingdom and rule, a peculiar idea o^" the pur- 
 pose of the preachin<ij of the Gospel and tlie work of 
 the Spirit, and a num]>er of other features which are 
 most serious in themselves and far-reaching in their 
 tendencies and lo<jical outcome. 
 
 At the recjuest of a number of brethren I have con- 
 sented to write something on this subject. It is only 
 because I am convinced the interests of truth demand 
 some more adequate discussion of this (juestion that I 
 undertake the duty, as I have a growing reluctance 
 
10 
 
 INTRODUCTION. 
 
 m 
 
 to antagonize the views of estimable brethren, some 
 of whom I number among my very dear friends. 
 
 It will be impossible in the present treatise to go 
 into minute details. I shall examine the question 
 along the line of the plainest New Testament teach- 
 ing in reference to the plainest New Testament prin- 
 ciples, seeking to interpret the obscure by what is 
 clear and not the reverse 
 
 C. G. 
 
 tt 
 
A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOGY. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 The first essential feature of the pre-inillennial 
 view to be examined has reference to the resurrection 
 of the dead. Its advocates hold that the righteous 
 dead alone are raised, and the living righteous changed, 
 at the coming of the Lord, which they declare is at 
 the beginning of the millennium. The wicked dead, 
 they believe, remain in their graves until after this 
 period and the great uprising of wickedness which 
 follows it (Rev. 20 : 7-10). The post-millennial view, 
 on the other hand, is that both the righteous and the 
 wicked dead are to be raised at the coming of the 
 Lord, which is thought to take place after the millen- 
 nium. Our first question then is : . 
 
 1. Do the Scriptures teach that the great period 
 represented by the thousand years and the final up- 
 rising of wickedness of Rev. 20 : 4-11 intervenes 
 between the resurrection of the righteous and the 
 resurrection of the wicked ? Or do they declare that 
 there is but a single resurrection including both the 
 just and the unjust ? 
 
 11 
 
12 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 Let it be clearly understood that it is essential to 
 the pre-millennial view that the former of these posi- 
 tions be established from the Word of God. There is 
 no one who doubts that the resurrection of the wicked 
 is after the millennium, at the end of all probation and 
 of the earthly history of our race in the tlesh. If 
 the resurrection of the righteous and of the wicked 
 constitutes a single grand event, then this general 
 resurrection and the coming of the Lord, which is 
 indissolubly associated with the resurrection of the 
 righteous, according to pre-millennial as well as 
 post-millennial views, must be after the millennium. 
 It is only as the resurrection of these two great 
 classes is torn asunder by the interjection of this vast 
 period that the pre-millennial view can stand. Here 
 is a direct issue. Let us reverently consult the 
 Word of God upon the question. 
 
 First : How are we to understand John 5 : 28, 29 : 
 " Marvel not at this (His giving spiritual life to the 
 spiritually dead, v. 25) : for the hour cometh in which 
 all that are in the tombs shall hear his voice and 
 shall couiQ forth : they that have done good unto the 
 resurrection of life, and they that have done ill to the 
 resurrection of judgment " ? 
 
 Does this not appear to be as plain a declaration of 
 a single and general resurrection of the dead, both 
 righteous and wicked, as could well be given ? It in- 
 cludes " all that are in the tombs." There is but a single 
 " voice " or summons of the Son of God for all, both 
 bad and good. This single summons all alike hear 
 and all alike obey and "come forth." Up to this 
 
THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 point all is common for botli clasHcs. It is only the 
 de.stinies which confront the two clasHcs a.s they 
 ecjually obey the summons and come forth, which are 
 in contrast as tremendous as the difference between 
 tluun in moral character. Language could scarcely be 
 more specific. Can we conceive our Lord would have 
 spoken in this explicit way of there being a single 
 resurrection for both classes to their opposite destinies 
 had He known that a great stretch of one thousand 
 years, which many think to represent a year for a 
 day, or 365,000 years, with time for the last great 
 growth and struggle of evil added, was to intervene 
 between the resurrection of the righteous and the 
 resurrection of the wicked ? However it might be 
 with an ordinary uneventful period of this duration, 
 would not the intervention of such a period — the 
 must stupendous in the history of the race and the 
 climax of the ages — be too great to be ignored ? 
 Would it not have separated these resurrections so 
 clearly and well-nigh boundlessly that He could not 
 have represented them as a single transaction — a 
 conmion " coming forth " in response to the same call ? 
 The resurrection would have been two separate and 
 distinct events which it would have been impossible 
 to bring together in this way and speak of as one. 
 
 It is no reply to this to refer to v. 25, "Verily, 
 verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming and now is 
 when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God 
 and they that hear shall live," where our Lord is 
 speaking of spiritual resurrection, and to argue that 
 the "hour" here spoken of is a long period which has 
 
14 
 
 A STT^DY IN ESrTTATOI.OnV. 
 
 already coutimiod for nearly two tliousaiKl years, and 
 that, thoroforc, this " hour " of physical resurrection 
 of V. 28 may !)0 a long period likewise. 
 
 In the ti"st place, it is anythin<^ but certain that the 
 " hour" of V. 25 is meant to cover the whole period in 
 which men are to receive spiritual quickening^. For 
 instance, had a man said in 177(), " The hour is coming 
 and now is, when the United States shall be indepen- 
 dent, ' the word " hour " in that connection would not 
 have been supposed to cover all the period in which 
 they were to remain independent, but would have had 
 exclusive reference to its beginning. Why should the 
 word "hour" in the identical expression, "The hour 
 is cominir and now is when the dead shall hear tlie 
 voice of the Son of God," etc., be interpreted to cover 
 more than the beginning of the period of spiritual 
 quickening ? 
 
 But allowing that 'hour" in v, 25 does refer to 
 this whole period, this " hour " of spiritual quickening 
 is a period throughout which this quickening con- 
 tinues unbroken by any time in which it does not 
 have place. So also of the " day " of salvation ; it is 
 a period during the whole of which salvation is to be 
 had. There is not a moment of it wherein sal-'ation 
 is not to be obtained. The same is true in every case 
 in which an hour or day is used for a long period, 
 unless John 5 : 28 is an exception. That of which it is 
 said to be the day or hour, as marking the great char- 
 acteristic feature of the period covered by the word 
 "day" or "hour," is true of every moment of the 
 period. Can we imagine that the whole period from 
 
THE RESUHRECTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 15 
 
 tlu! first coiniiiix of our Lord until th(; ond would have 
 been called the " hour" of spiritual <|ui('keuin<jf or the 
 "day" of salvation were there to luive been but a 
 very brief — perhaps only momentary — display of 
 (juickenin<if and savin<( power at its beginning and at 
 its close, and lon<^ ages lying between when neither 
 was to be had ? 
 
 Now, what are the facts in reference to this *' hour " 
 of physical resurrection in John 5 : 28, 20, according to 
 the pre- millennial view i Is this supposed to be an 
 unbroken period throughout which men's bodies con- 
 tinue to be raised from the dead, and of whicli, there- 
 fore, this physical resurrection is the abiding charac- 
 teristic ? Wy no means. The resurrection of the dead 
 is not thought by Pre-millennialists any more than 
 by us, to be a long-drawn process covering a mil- 
 lennium of years. All believe it to take place '* in a 
 moment, in the twinkling of an eye," as Paul declares 
 in 1 Cor. 15 : 51, 52. But our pre-millennial brethren 
 hold that instantaneous resurrection is predicable of 
 the righteous only. Succeeding this electric shock of 
 quickening power is the long-stretching millennium — 
 the most transcendent era in the history of God's peo- 
 ple. Like the period from the resurrection of Christ 
 until that of the righteous, during these centuries 
 there are to be none raised from the dead. It is only 
 at its close that there is to be another flash of resur- 
 rection might, as the v/icked dead are called forth to 
 receive their final doom. 
 
 Can we believe, in defiance of all scripture usage 
 elsewhere in reference to what is said to be tlie chief 
 
^ 
 
 16 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOfSY. 
 
 tharactoristic of poriods <leai^iiate(l by the word 
 " (lay " or " liotir," that our Lord liad ho Httle regard 
 for the Ion^-strctchin«ij and tran.sccndent period be- 
 tween these lightnin<^-like fhishes of (juickeninf^ 
 power, as to if^nore it alto^j^ether, and speak of the 
 whole period as the " hour " in which *hose " who are 
 in the tombs shall hear his voice," ev.n representinjjf 
 the resurrection as bat a sinj^le transaction in which 
 there shall be a simultai •- ■ coining forth of both 
 ri<;hteous and wicke(^ \n n jonse id the same call ? 
 Are we not forced to bt e''e that John 5 : 27-29 means 
 just what it says, and that both righteous and wicked 
 are raised in the same resurrection ? * 
 
 We must also remember tl it we have references to 
 the summons to the deat' in other descriptions of the 
 resurrection. In 1 Cor. 15 : 51, 52 we read, " Behold, 
 I show you a mystery ; we shall not all sleep but we 
 shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling 
 of an eye, at the last trump; for the trumpet shall 
 sound and the dead shall be raised," etc. Also, in 
 1 Thess. 4: 16, "For the Lord himself shall descend 
 from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the arch- 
 angel, and the trump of God ; and the dead in Christ 
 shall rise first," etc.-f* 
 
 I 
 
 * Reference will he made further on to the view that there is a 
 specialresurrection of the tribulation saints. 
 
 t This passage is sometimes thoughtlessly quoted as though it 
 declared the righteous dead were to be raised before the wicked 
 dea;!. We have only to read the preceding verse and the one that 
 follows, to see that the (question was wliether the living saints, at 
 the appearing of Christ, should have precedence over the righteous 
 dead. " No," says Paul, "the righteous dead shall rise first and 
 then with the living saints shall be caught up," etc 
 
THE UESUUHEfTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 17 
 
 3 word 
 
 rej;ar«l 
 
 io<l be- 
 
 ikening 
 
 of tlio 
 
 vlio are 
 
 Honting 
 
 I which 
 
 of both 
 
 lie call ? 
 
 } means 
 
 wicked 
 
 ences to 
 IS of the 
 Beliold, 
 but we 
 nnkling 
 et shall 
 Also, in 
 descend 
 le arch- 
 Christ 
 
 tliere is a 
 
 though it 
 le wicked 
 
 one that 
 saints, at 
 righteous 
 
 first and 
 
 So fur as w«' know, all iwv agnuid tliat the "voice" 
 of Jolin 5 : 28, 29 and the " shout" and the " trump " 
 of these j)assa;^«}s n fer to the sann; startling sunnnons 
 which shall call forth the dead. Jn I Cor. lo: 52 it 
 is called the " last trump." If there were to be a call 
 for the righteous at the beginning of the millennium 
 and aTiother at the close for the wicked, we cannot 
 untlerstand how this in 1 Cor. 15: ')2, which Prc-mil- 
 lennialists <leclare is of the righteous at the beginning 
 of the resurrection, could be called the " last." It 
 would be the first, unless it is to continue during all 
 the millennial period until the wicked rise at its close, 
 which no one believes. No : there is but a single 
 summons. It is called the last, because it comes at 
 the end of the world. In Corinthians, as the apostle 
 is speaking only of believers, they alone are men- 
 tioned as responding to it. In John 5 : 28, 29, where 
 our Lord has reference to both classes, both are said 
 to be raised in response to the same summons, which, 
 in Corinthians, Paul calls the " last trump." Thus it 
 is seen there is but a single and general resurrection 
 of all, and it is at the end of all things. 
 
 So, from whatever standpoint we view this passage, 
 it seems impossible, without the greatest violence, or 
 even with the greatest violence, to make it square 
 with the pre-millennial theory of two distinct resur- 
 rections, separated by an immense and grand period. 
 If, however, there be but a single resurrection in- 
 cluding both good and bad, this view will be ac- 
 knowledged by its friends to be without foundation, 
 land the alternative post-millennial belief in a single 
 2 
 
^^ 
 
 i 
 
 18 
 
 A STI^DY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 rcHiirroctioii at the close of tlie inillcmiiiiin will he 
 eHtal)li.slu;(i. 
 
 Tlio roHurrectioii of l»oth the rij^litisou.s aii<l the 
 wicked is admitted by all t«) he mentioned in Acts 
 24: 15, whore Paul declares it to be the teaching of 
 the prophets tliat " there shall be a resurrection both 
 of the just and unjust." 
 
 This declaration seems, also, to be perfectly explicit. 
 It is a single resurrection in which both the unjust 
 and the just are to share. The language covdd not 
 have been better chosen to make any other meaning 
 impossible, l^iul does not say there sliall be resur- 
 rections of the just and unjust, neither does he say 
 there shall be a resurrection of the just and a resur- 
 rection of tlie unjust, which would have left room for 
 a separate resurrection of each class. But the words 
 "a resurrection both of the just and unjust" leave 
 no room for a distinct resurrection of eacli class, sep- 
 arated poles-wide apart, by the intervention of a 
 period covering the grandest triumphs and the most 
 terrific struggle of the Church's history. It seems 
 simply incredible that the apostle could have used 
 this language had he known that such was to be. If 
 one is prepared to accept the plainest meaning of 
 language, this passage shuts him in to a single resur- 
 rection, but one including both the righteous and the 
 wicked, and therefore, in the most perfect accord with 
 John 5 : 28, 29. 
 
 Let us also refer to a passage in the Old Testament 
 which has the plainest bearing upon the question be- 
 fore us. Daniel 12:2 declares, " And many of them 
 
TIIK UKsrUUECTION (»F THE DEAD. 
 
 19 
 
 will 1 
 
 >c 
 
 an«l tlie 
 
 in Acts 
 
 .chiiij^ of 
 
 ,ion botli 
 
 explicit, 
 e unjust 
 ouM not 
 nieanin*^ 
 be resur- 
 ;h he Hay 
 i a re.sur- 
 rooni for 
 he words 
 ist" leave 
 asH, sep- 
 ion of a 
 he most 
 t seems 
 ive used 
 o be. If 
 aning of 
 le resur- 
 and the 
 ord with 
 
 jstament 
 stion be- 
 of them 
 
 m 
 
 i 
 
 Ihni sleep in th(^ <hist of tlie earth shall awake, some 
 to everlastiii;.^ Iif<', and some to shame and evei'last- 
 in;^ conti'rnpt." 
 
 This passatjje refers to the resurrection of the body, 
 for it is "of those who slee}) in the dust of the earth." 
 It is also a resurrection of both rij^hteous and wicked: 
 for it is to the contrasted destinies of "(everlasting 
 life" and " shanu? and evieriastin^ contempt." It is a 
 single resiirrection of both these classes, for both 
 clas.ses to<:jethcr constitute the " many " who are to 
 awak<', anil they are to awake at the single definite 
 time mentioned in the prophecy. 
 
 It is also said that, allowing this to be a single 
 resurrection of botli classes, it is not a resurrection of 
 all the dead. It is claimed that the expression, "many 
 of them that sleep," implies that part of them that 
 sleep are not raised. 
 
 But the expression " many " in Scripture is often 
 used for "all." For instance : Paul in Gal. :i : 27, "For 
 as many of you as were baptized into Christ did put 
 on Christ," did not mean that only a part of the Gala- 
 tian believers had been baptized. 
 
 In any case, supposing the resurrection to be partial, 
 it is a simultaneous resurrection of both righteous 
 and wicked, which is as much at variance with the 
 pre- millennial idea as is a general resurrection of the 
 two great classes. 
 
 Besides, the Word of God explicitly denies the 
 j resurrection of either class in sections, as the inter- 
 Ipretation of Dan. 12 : 2 as referring to a part only of 
 [the righteous and of the wicked, would make neces- 
 
20 
 
 A sTt'DY IN EsrfiAToror.Y. 
 
 !M 
 
 Hary ; for, as all tlni doaii nrv. to ri.s««, if tluji't! is one? 
 partial rcsunvction, it imiHt Ik* Muccoedcd })y another 
 of the Hainc kind of tho.st' who remain. Now Paul in 
 1 Cor. 15: 2.'i, speaking of the; n'surreotion of CliriHt 
 and HiH ])eop]o, .says, "Hut eaeh in his own order, 
 ('hrint the firstfruits, then they that are ClhriHtH, at 
 l\is couiinj^." Il«'re I'aul .sayH all who are Christ's 
 are to rise at His comin;^. There is then only one 
 resurrection of the ri;;hteous and that of all. Tin; 
 resurrection, then, of Dan. 12: 2 must be of all the 
 rit^hteous, since it ia of some of them, an<l it is there 
 declared that the resurrection of the wicked is simul- 
 taneous with that of the ri^^hteous — a {general resur- 
 rection of both classes. 
 
 It is also generally admitted that our Lord, in .fohn 
 6 : 28, 29, borrows the lan^ua^^e of Dan. 12:2. Dani(d 
 says, " Many that sleep." Our Lord says, " All that 
 are in the tombs." If our Lord liere does borrow the 
 lanf^uage of Dan. 12:2, He interprets the " many" of 
 Daniel to mean '* all," and we must do likewise, and 
 the two passages are mutually confirmatory in their 
 teacliings. 
 
 Others propose to sot aside the force of Dan. 12:2 
 by the translation of IVegelles, made in the interest 
 of the pre-millennial theory : " Many from among the 
 sleepers of the dust of the earth shall awake, these 
 shall be unto everlasting life : but those (the rest of 
 the sleepers) shall be unto shame and everlasting con- 
 tempt." 
 
 So far as we are aware, no commentator has given 
 this interpretation even a mention. 
 
 9 
 
 ■i 
 
 I 
 
 M ; 
 
TIIK IlKsrnUKfTinN OK TIIK DKAD. 
 
 21 
 
 
 It is also Hlj^!»ifirant tluit tho first vtTw? introducing 
 this HtutciiM'tit slioiil<l c«)rn'Mpon«l so clost'ly with livv. 
 20 : 7-10, wliich ilcscrihos tlu; tiino of trouble previous 
 t(» tlu^ rcHurri'Ctiou and jud^jinmt of vs. 11-15. 
 TluTo is a period of uiicxanipled trilmlation f<»r the 
 ri<dit«'ous in each case. When tlii^ troul>le was at tlio 
 "•reatcst, in each case, th(5 tlulivurance came, and tho 
 delivoranco iH followed l»y a renurrection. In each 
 eas(! "the book" in which the names of the saints are 
 said to be written, is mentioned. The two passages 
 Hi.'em to refer to tlie san>e time and the same event. 
 So far as it is ma<h' phiin that llev. 20: 11-15 refers 
 to a «;eneral resurrection, therefore Dan. 12:2 speaks 
 also of a resurrection of all. 
 
 Wo need consider at len{.{th in this connection only 
 Rev. 20: 11-15: "And I saw a great white throne 
 and him that sat upon it, from whose face tlie earth 
 and the lieaven fle(l away: antl there was found n(j 
 place for tl»em : And 1 saw the dead, the j^reat and 
 the Hiiiall, .standin;^ before the throne: and books 
 were opened: and another book was opened, which is 
 the book of life : and the dead were jud<^ed out of the 
 things which were written in the books, accordin<( to 
 their works. And tho sea gave up the dead which 
 were in it: and death and Hades gave up the dead 
 wliich were in them : and they were judged every 
 man according to tlieir works. And death and Hades 
 were cayt into the lake of fire. This is the second 
 (leath, even tho lake of fire. And if any was not 
 found written in the book of life, he was cast into the 
 lake of fire." 
 
22 
 
 A STriiV \S rscilATnr.OiJY. 
 
 I'n>-iiiill(MiiiiiiliNtM and I^)Ht-l^ilKMllliHliNtN aj^rcc tlirit 
 thiM |niHMa;j(' rolors to a literal, pliyHical n'Miirrrction 
 ni' i\w (U>m\. 'Iho Un'iuvr, hovvoviT, aro C()in|M'llo<l to 
 • '.^licvc it a (loNcriptioii ol' tlu' ro.surn'ctioii of tho 
 w'i('k<'«l (U'lvl aloiu'. It jh only in tluH way that tlicir 
 intorprutatioti of tlni previous part of tliin cliapter, 
 V8. 4-7, ah of a pliy.sical ri'.suirectioM of tliu i'i;;lit«'oUH, 
 ca!i Im' niaiiitjkiiit!(l or tlicir general pOHition In* saved 
 from overthrow. 
 
 Ihit the hiri;^ua^e of tlie passage seeiim very phiiii. 
 'Phi! whole description is of such surpassinj^ t^ramh'nr 
 tliat we could scarcely tlunk it had reference to th«) 
 wi('k(Ml alone, especially, as in the rest of the New 
 'restanient, chief prominence and emphaniH is ^iven to 
 the resurrection of tlu; rij^hteouH. Notice also th*! 
 expressions used: " 'I'he dead." "The deatl, the ^reat 
 and tlie snuill." ('an tlie wonls, "I saw the tlead," 
 mean the rest of the d<;ad, after tlu; ri^Iiteous dea<l 
 had been raised:* Can "the (h^id, the great and 
 small," mean anything less than all the dead ;* The 
 inspired writer uses the expression "small and threat" 
 in four other passages, and in each passage it means 
 all classes of those mentioned. Chap. 11 : 18, "Them 
 that fear tiiy name, the small and the great," and 
 chap. 19:5, " All ye his servants, ye that fear him, the 
 small and the great," include all classes of God's ser- 
 vants who fear Him. Chap. 18: IG, "And he causeth 
 all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, 
 and the free and tlie bond ; " chap. 19 : 18, " The tlesh 
 of all men, both free and bond, and small and great." 
 Neither can there be any doubt in these two passages 
 
 Hi,:!! 
 
TIIK llHSiruur.CTIoN' OV THE DEAD. 
 
 23 
 
 tlirtt "MiiiJill hihI ^^iviit" iticIu«l«?H nil thoHO HpooiflotI, hh 
 \v«'II ii.M " rich ami |)<M>r," * IhhkI ami froo." How can 
 wv hclicvc, then, that in Hcv. 20: 12, "An<l I hhw the 
 i|«>a<l, the ^rcat aii<l th<; HUiall, Ntamliti;; hcForc thu 
 throno," " jjrcat ami .sniall " ri't'or.s only to one «'iaHH of 
 the dead, that of the wicke<l, rather than to ail the 
 (lead, ri;;httM)U.s as well, as John's usa^e of tlu^ cxpres- 
 sion as well jus its very nieaninj^ re(|iiires i* Ha*! the 
 writer meant to (le.si<^nate the (lea<l, j^reat ami Ninall, 
 a.s the iniri;^ht<!oUH only, would he not have saMl h(» f- 
 
 Notice also other expreHsions : **Tho aea j^ave up 
 the (h'ttti which were in it," "death and Hades 
 ;^'ave up the dead which were in them," not the 
 wicked dead, but " the dead " a.s a .single great class, 
 including all ! What a strange pertinency in these 
 expressions, if the wicked were iill of the dead that 
 remained in their graves ! 
 
 Uut the most conclusive considorations remain. 
 There is no ilisputo that all who share in the judg- 
 ment here des('ribe«l in such grand terms have also 
 shared in the resurrection which precedes it. If lK)th 
 righteous and wicked are described here as ju<lged 
 together, then both these classes are also declared to 
 have been raised in the resurrection here |)ortraycd. 
 The answer to the (luestion, "Are the righteous he^'o 
 judged :* " will be the answer to the (juestion, " Were 
 the righteous then raised from the dead ?" And can 
 we escape the conclusion that both righteous and 
 wicked are here ju<lged ;* When " the dead, the great 
 and the small," stood before the throne, " books were 
 opened : and another book was opened, which is the 
 
1 IL V\, P" 
 
 mm'. 
 
 m 
 
 \ 1 
 
 : 1 h 
 
 1 i! 
 
 iiil!^ 
 
 '^'ill'i 
 
 
 il 
 
 ill I 
 
 212 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 Those of the Pre-millennialiHts wlio do not commit 
 themselves to the doctrine of a coming for, and a com- 
 ing with, His people, believe this "day" to include 1,2,3, 
 7, 9, 10, 11, 12. 13, 14 of the above. Post-millennial- 
 ists believe this day includes the coming of the Lord, 
 the resurrection of good and bad, the judgment of all, 
 their reward and punishments respectively, and the 
 last conflagration. Let us refer to all the passages in 
 which these terms are used, and see whether there 
 is any allusion in thtm to the restoration and con- 
 version of the Jews, the personal reign of Christ over 
 a hoi}' people upon the earth, a great uprising of the 
 wicked and their attack upon the saints while He is 
 with them in personal presence and power, which all 
 classes of Pre-millennialists believe included in that 
 day. Almost all believe, also, that during the millen- 
 nial part of this " day," the work of salvation which 
 has made little progress prior to our Lord's coming, 
 will then, in connection with the labors of the Jews 
 who are to be converted at its beginning, sweep over 
 the earth in glorious might, until all men are brought 
 to the feet of Jesus in devoted subjection and adoring 
 love. 
 
 But what do the Scriptures say that day contains ? 
 
 The dead are to be raised on that " last day " (John 
 6:39, 40,44, 54; 11:24). 
 
 That day shall be the great day of searching judg- 
 ment. Men shall be then judged by the word of 
 Christ (John 12 : 48), the Gospel of Christ (Rom. 2 : IG), 
 must give account for every idle word (Matt. 12 : 30), 
 will have the emptiness of mere formal service exposed 
 
TFFE RESUIIUECTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 25 
 
 ka, espc- 
 then to 
 life had 
 and all 
 reigning 
 this eaHo 
 for none 
 jfore the 
 ti of the 
 ividently 
 fore the 
 language 
 is repre- 
 10 are to 
 otice the 
 ritten in 
 fire." It 
 n in the 
 ;," as our 
 ) be, but, 
 anguage 
 al mean- 
 re found 
 ed there 
 
 ut of the 
 those in 
 Being 
 ritten in 
 ceording 
 ley were 
 
 rewarded according to their works — the degree of con- 
 
 doiniiation being measured according to the coinpara- 
 
 i i ve evil of their deeds. They were Judged. A general 
 
 decision, which must be condemnatory or approving, 
 
 was passed upon them, involving the presence of both 
 
 [classes before the throne. The language is in most 
 
 exact harmony with a judgment of both righteous and 
 
 [wicked, each one according to his works, whether good 
 
 lor evil. How it can be made to harmonize with a 
 
 ■judgment of the wicked only, where there is nothing 
 
 d)ut condenniation for evil works, seems hard to 
 
 imagine. 
 
 80 we find that the plain implication of almost every 
 
 [clause of this passage shuts us in to a single resurrec- 
 
 jtion and judgment, including both the righteous and 
 
 [the wicked. Well may Mr. Hill, a pre-millennial 
 
 [writer, declare : "If it were lawful to consider it, as 
 
 ft has been in past ages considered, a description 
 
 )f a simultaneous and universal judgment of all that 
 
 have ever lived, it would not be easy to find words 
 
 more comprehensive than these, ' the dead, small and 
 
 ;reat, stand before God,'" etc.* Indeed, there is 
 
 scarcely any passage on whose interpretation exegetes 
 
 lave been more agreed. It is significant that Dr. 
 
 Jordonf admits that this passage refers to a resur- 
 
 [•ection of both classes, but assumes it to be of righteous 
 
 )eople who die during the millennium. This view, 
 
 Committing those who hold it to the reign of death 
 
 ^ver a class of the righteous after the coming of the 
 
 • " Lent. Lectures," p. 294. t '' Ecce Venit," p. 273. 
 
^ 
 
 26 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOaY. 
 
 Lord, will, we arc sure, appear to moat readers to 
 involve more serious difficulty than that from which 
 it would relieve the pre-millennial view. In any case 
 the evidence thus afforded, that this passage ref<!rs 
 to a resurrection and jud<(iiient of both classes, is 
 exceedingly strong. 
 
 We have finished our examination of the four great 
 passages bearing most directly upon the first (juestion 
 at issue between Pre- and Post-millennialists — whether 
 there is a single resurrection including both the just 
 and the unjust, or whether there are two separate 
 resurrections, that of the righteous before the millen- 
 nium, and that of the wicked not until after this long 
 and grand period. They all seem to declare, in lan- 
 guage which could scarcely be more plain and explicit, 
 for the former view. As these four are the only pas- 
 sages in which the resurrection of the wicked as well 
 as of the righteous is directly referred to, their obvious 
 agreement in the teaching of a simultaneous resurrec- 
 tion of the just and the unjust furnishes the very 
 strongest argument against the pre-millennial view. 
 We shall consider, in their place, Rev. 20 : 4-6, and 
 one or two other passages which Pre-millennialists 
 claim support their belief in two separate resurrec- 
 tions of the dead. We shall only in this place repeat 
 what Dr. D. Brown says in view of the admission of 
 Mr. Hill given above, but w^ho still clung to Rev. 
 20 : 4-6 as proof of the soundness of the pre-millen- 
 nial position : " He explains a passage about which 
 there has been more unanimity in all ages than on 
 
 il 1; 
 
 1 f'l ! 
 
THE UESURUECTION OF THE DEAD. 
 
 27 
 
 almost niiy other portion of Scripture by a passage on 
 whicli tlierc lias been more diversity tlian, perliaps, 
 abnost any paHsa<^e of God's Word."* How much less 
 ()u;^^ht we to allow any special interpretation of this 
 obscure passa<.je to override the plainest meaning of 
 the four plainest portions of Scripture bearing upon 
 the (juestion. 
 
 * " Tilt) Second Advent," p. 2U0. 
 
28 
 
 A STUDY IN ES<'HAT()r,()GY. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE GENERAL JUDGMENT. 
 
 PliE-MlLLENNTALlSTS hold that the righteous, so far 
 as they are judged, are judged uh well as raised from 
 the dead at the introduction of the millennium ; but 
 thatthe wicked dead are not judged until after its close. 
 They interject, therefore, the period represented by the 
 one thousand years and the last struggle with evil of 
 Rev. 20 : 4-10, between the judgment of the righteous 
 and the wicked. They also separate the second com- 
 ing of the Lord from the judgment of the wicked by 
 the same lengthy period, and deny a general judgment 
 of the just and the unjust, in the same way as they 
 deny a general resurrection of both classes of the 
 dead. Post-milleunialists affirm that there is a single 
 judgment of the righteous and of the wicked, and that 
 the wicked as well as the righteous are judged at 
 Christ's coming, and not a long period after. 
 
 It must also be borne in mind that as both Pre- 
 and Post-millennialists agree that the judgment of 
 both righteous and wicked takes place in immediate 
 connection with their resurrection from the dead, the 
 evidence as to a general resurrection and that as to a 
 general judgment must agree, and mutually supple- 
 ment and strengthen each other. 
 
THE (iF'AKIlAI- .TrnriMEXT. 
 
 20 
 
 What, then, is tlu! twichin^]r of Scripture on the 
 (|iu'sti()n of a general ju<l«^nient of rij^liteous and 
 wicked ( 
 
 First, let the reader turn to Matt. 25 : 31-49, and 
 
 read it attentively. All agree that this coming of 
 
 the Son of man in His glory, accompanied by the 
 
 [angelic hosts, is His second personal coming. Neither 
 
 is there any dispute as to the time when the judgment 
 
 described takes place. It is "then," " when the Son 
 
 iof man shall come," etc., that the nations shall be 
 
 Igathered, and the separation and judgment shall occur. 
 
 There is also an agreement that it is but a single 
 
 Ijudgnu^nt. " All the nations " shall be gathered liefore 
 
 JHim as He sits on " the throne of his glory " (vs. 31, 
 
 J32). After they are all .so gathered the separation takes 
 
 jplace (v. 33). " Then " (v. 34), whil^ He still remains 
 
 seated upon His throne, as soon as they are separated, 
 
 [e addresses those on His right hand in words 
 
 weighted with infinite blessing, " Come, ye blessed of 
 
 iiy Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from 
 
 ^he foundation of the world," and proceeds to give the 
 
 grounds of His judgment (vs. 35-40). " Then," as 
 
 loon as the judgment of the righteous is completed, 
 
 Ind while He still remains seated on the throne, He 
 
 [roceeds to pass the terrible sentence on those upon 
 
 is left hand, " Depart from me, ye cursed, into the 
 
 bernal fire prepared for the devil and his angels," 
 
 be. (v. 41). If words can make anything plain, this 
 
 a single judgment in two successive acts, not two 
 
 ^parate judgments, sundered by an immense period 
 
 supreme moment, So plain is this teaching of a 
 
218 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 pro-inilleniiial view makes tl.j resurrection and judg- 
 ment of the rigliteous and of the wicked occur in 
 two distinct ages, the wicked being raised and judged 
 in the age or world to come. 
 
 Does not all the plain teaching of the New Testa- 
 ment give the opposite impression :* In this case, 
 especially, we do not see how it is possible to force 
 the pre-millennial interpretation of Rev. 20: 4-11 
 upon the rest of the New Testament without bringing 
 these verses into such Hat contradiction with the 
 teaching of the passages which refer to the day 
 variously designated " the last day," " the day of 
 judgment," etc., as to endanger the inspiration of 
 either Rev. 20: 4-11, or of all the passages with 
 which it is brought into conflict. Will anyone venture 
 to assume, in order to escape the difficulty, that " the 
 day of judgment," " the day of the Lord," etc., do not 
 refer to the same period as that covered by " the last 
 day " ? But this would require great hardihood. It 
 would be necessary to maintain that " the day of 
 judgment" and "the last day" were not the same 
 period, although the same grand events are said to 
 take place in them both. It would also require him 
 to defy the consensus of Christian scholarship.* 
 
 Or will anyone say that the millennial age belongs 
 to the present age as distinguished from the age to 
 come ? But this would be to give up the central 
 doctrine of Pre-miilennialism, and take the heart out 
 
 
 * E.g., see Cremer, Thayer, Robinson, " Lex. New Test. Greek,' 
 art. day {/'//icpa). 
 
 Li'-'! 
 
THE GENERAL JUDGMENT. 
 
 31 
 
 liow any of tlio non-ChriHtian iiation.s could in any 
 crtHO ho tittinj^ly a<Mr(!HH(Ml, "Come, yo blcsHod of my 
 Kiitlicr, inherit the kinj^dom prepared for you from 
 (he foundation of the worhl." This surely means 
 that they were .saved, and a8 tliey are " non-Chris- 
 tian " it means that tliey liave been saved either with- 
 out tlie (Jospel or while rejecting it, a doctrine we are 
 sure few Pre-miUennialists will care to accept. lUit 
 ullow that they are of the Chi'istian nations, and are 
 saved and worthy of this .salvation, then w^e may well 
 in(|uire, why were they not changed and caught up 
 to meet the Lord in the air with the rest of the 
 righteous ? Why do only a part of the saved who 
 are alive at His coming receive this full ecpiipment 
 for the resurrection life ? There is no hint in Scrip- 
 ture of any such distinction among the .saved. The 
 passages just referred to declare that all the living 
 , righteous .shallbe changed. In brief,those to whom our 
 [Loi'd addresses His gracious words, if they are not a 
 |cla.ssof the wicked, which is absurd, must have shared 
 in the general change of the righteous into the resur- 
 [rection body. This attempted interpretation, which 
 is assumed with as great confidence as want of dis- 
 crimination, breaks down at every point. 
 
 The other view most commonly held by Pre-mil- 
 lennialists is that this is a judgment of two classes of 
 jiving nations, and not a judgment of individuals. 
 
 As well might it be urged, from Matt. 28 : 19, " Make 
 
 [isciples of all the nations," that men are to be dis- 
 
 ppled by wholesale, and not the individual men and 
 
 romen of all nations. "All nations" here means all 
 
.12 
 
 A STlinV IN KS(IIAT()I/)(3Y. 
 
 mot). Aiiti liow cat) iiatioiis liavo .such a final aixl 
 <;l()ri()iiH or tiMril)l(! Ht'iitenco j)roii<»uiK'i'(l upon thcni '. 
 It iH to he HUppoHcd tliat inoie antl more, as tlie a«jfeH 
 go by, will the ri^jhtcouH and tho wicked niin^^lo to- 
 gether among the nations. It must follow, then, that 
 the good in nations predominantly had, or that have 
 treated the .Jews badly, will endure the eternal curse 
 and punishment " prc^pared for the devil and his 
 angels," while the wicked in nations pnulominantly 
 good, or who have favored the Jews, will enter into 
 the eternal blessedness prepared for them forsooth 
 from the foundation of the world. This is a revolu- 
 tion of our ideas of the judgment, surely. It asks us 
 to believe that the judgment, instead of righting all 
 wrong, will but intensify the wrong to many, and 
 make it final and irremediable. 
 
 If this is a judgment of nations as nations and not 
 of individuals, the representation of their having a 
 collociuy with the judge, and of their visiting the 
 sick, etc., seems hard to explain. Some would under- 
 stand it to refer to mere temporal and national re- 
 wards and punishments ; but this explanation is 
 utterly at variance with the expressions, " Enter the 
 kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the 
 world," and " Depart, ye cursed, unto the everlasting 
 fire," etc. The judgment is final. If this is a judg- 
 ment of the nations, therefore, it follows that there is 
 to be a final judgment in which " each one shall " not 
 " give an account of himself to God," and in which 
 Christ shall not " render to every man according to 
 his deeds ; " but in which the destiny of many shall 
 
THE (IKNEUAL .lUDtJMENT. 
 
 33 
 
 iml and 
 II them ;* 
 tl»o aj^cH 
 in^^le to- 
 len, that 
 iiat have 
 lal curse 
 and his 
 uinantly 
 liter into 
 forHOoth 
 [I revolu- 
 b asks us 
 htinjij all 
 any, and 
 
 i and not 
 having a 
 ting the 
 id under- 
 ional re- 
 lation is 
 nter tVie 
 on of the 
 erlasting 
 s a judg- 
 t there is 
 hall " not 
 in which 
 ording to 
 any shall 
 
 ho decided according to the prevailing conduct ol' mil- 
 lions, or as their government has treated the Jews, all 
 in the flattest contradiction to Rom. 14: 12, Matt. 
 10: -27, etc. 
 Others make vague and confused conjectures.* 
 Dr. Gordon has no settled view of the pa-ssage.-j* 
 The generally accepted pre-millennial explanation 
 of tlie ground of this judgment is scarcely le.ss ohjec- 
 tional)l(^ The " brethren " of tlie Lord spoken of in 
 V. 40 are regarded as the Jews, and all the living 
 nations are to have their eternal destiny determined 
 hy the way they have treated these Jews. Reference 
 is made to oel 3:11 aq., in proof; but all these nations 
 (see 8 : 2-8) are the enemies of the Lord's people, and 
 cannot represent the sheep as well as the goats of 
 Matt. 25 : 31 f^cj., even if it has a reference to a final 
 judgment at all. Can we believe that the action of 
 all living nations toward the Jews is what will deter- 
 mine their eternal destiny when our Lord comes ? 
 
 As all attempts to force this passage into harmony 
 with the pre-millennial view involve such contradic- 
 tions — may we not almost say absurdities ? — we seem 
 to be shut in to the interpretation which almost all 
 icxegetes in all ages have adopted as the one lying 
 [upon its face, that such a Pre-millennialist as Mr. 
 Bilks declares " the Church has universally applied it 
 [to the decision of the final state of mankind "I — that 
 
 •Brookes, "Maranatha," p. 488; Blackstone, "Jesus is Com- 
 ing." p. 68. 
 
 f'Ecce Venit,"p. 269. 
 :|: •• Lent. Lect. for 1843," No. vii. 
 3 
 
34 
 
 A HTITPY IN ESrilATOr.nOY. 
 
 it is a Hiil>liiiu' «l(»Hcripti«)r> of the ^^curnil jinl;;iiMMit of 
 all iM(>ii at tlu! coming of tlif Lonl. Any ohscurity 
 aHHoc'iatrd with it in iinporttnl into its interpretation 
 l>y exalting the mere Hettin<j^ of th«' j^ratul seene into 
 CHHential features ; ns, for instance, wliere " my breth- 
 ren " (v. 40) is nuuh^ to represent some third distinct 
 and separate chiss. 
 
 Notice also the bearing of this passajjje on anotlier 
 feature of the pre-milleiuiial thory — that the saints, 
 raised from the dead and chan^^ed, have been ('au<,djt 
 up to meet tlie Lord, and accompany Ifim as He de- 
 scends, and sliare with Him in this assumed jud«^ment 
 of the (|uick or livinj:^ nations. Now v. 81 does not 
 say " when tlie Son of man sliall come in liis <^lory " 
 nndall His risen an<l chanj^ed saints with Him, but "all 
 the anjreis with him." Is it not sijxniHcant that tlie 
 very class Pre-millennialists suppose will have the 
 chief place next to the JudjL(e in this grand transac- 
 tion are ignored altogether ;* Could this be, were this 
 pre-millenuial conception the true one ' 
 
 But the prevalent pre-millennial interpretation of 
 this passage as a judgment of all the living nations 
 seems absolutely irreconcilable with other features 
 of their view. It is declared with glowing emphasis 
 that the Gospel is to have its grandest triumphs 
 after our Lord comes, and that it is vain for us to 
 hope for great progress in saving the world until 
 after He has appeared. The Jews are to be con- 
 verted, and are then to be the great missionaries 
 through whom marvels of saving power are to be 
 wrought. Now, if the living nations were all judged, 
 
THE OENKIIAI. JITOnMEN'T. 
 
 an<l l)()tli cluNst'N H))))()iiit<><l to their ctrnwil (icstiiiy, 
 wlH'Mct' comi! tliosn nmltitiidos of uiirij^htcouM people 
 who ar«! t») he converted throu;^di tliis »i;;ency Jiftcr 
 this very judtjment which hus coMHi^^iied ail tho 
 wickuil to the i'verlastin*; fire prepared I'or the devil 
 ami his angels <* Does the expression " all the natioim," 
 lifter all, inclu<le only a part of the nations f Or 
 jift(!r they are all (gathered, do some of them remain 
 uiijud^^ed f Our pre-millennial friends hold that the 
 .lews are not inelude<l in the nations; hut where are 
 the people to eo!ne from to whom they are to <;o when 
 they themselves are hroujj^ht to Christ i* There seems 
 no way of reconciling these contra<lietory features of 
 pre-milleinual inter[)retation and belief. 
 
 2 Thesa. 1 : (i-IO, " If so be that it is a ri^diteous 
 thin;^ with (uxl to recom[)ense affliction to them that 
 atHict you, and to you that are afflicted rest with us, 
 at the revelation of the Lord Jesus from heaven 
 with tlie anj^els of his power in flamin«^ fire, ren- 
 <lerin^' vengeance to them tliat know not(io<l, an«l to 
 theui that obey not the <^ospeI of our Lord Jesus: 
 who shall suffer })unishment, even eternal destruction 
 from the face of the Lord and from the j(Iory of 
 his mijrht, when he shall come to be glorified in 
 his saints and to be marvelled at in all them that 
 believed." 
 
 J^otice first, that "at the revelation of the Lord 
 Jesus"— His second coming — not only will those 
 that are suffering persecution be rewarded with 
 "rest," but the persecutors will be punislied witli 
 "affliction." The apostle repeats this thought and 
 
A RTITDV IN KSrifATOT.OOY. 
 
 iiiiikcM ItotI) tlic rt^WHi'din;^^ iukI tlic piiiiisliiii^^ ^^'iicnil. 
 " Ktenuil (It'Mtructioii " is to full on " tlu'iii tlwit know 
 not CUmJ," iiixl " tlicin that oU'y not tlu» ^o.sjm'I," 
 " wlicn he mIihII conn? to Im ^lorifictl in his Huints," 
 etc. Ilotli cluNHeH, the unrij^litcous iind i\w ri;jlit- 
 eons, iii'ti Huid to bo rcwimlrd, wlim Christ conit'S . 
 anrain. Hut art' tho (lend to be incUided in tliose vvh«) 
 lire liere dealt with, or are they but chiMHes of tlioHe 
 who are to l)e alive at ChriHt's coining!' 'I'h(!y niust 
 b<» of the dead : for they are to inehuU? the perseeuted 
 Theasalonian believerH and their perHecMitors, who 
 have been nearly two thousand years in their ;;raves. 
 Hut is this Ju'i;;iMent to be of all the «lead f While in 
 the tirst part of the passa<;e I'aul refers only to tlie 
 persecuted saints at Thessalonica and their persecu- 
 toiTi in the latter portion of it, he shows that thesj? 
 u)ut share in a {general distribution of rewanls and 
 punishments: for "them that know not (Jod" and 
 " them that obey not the ^os))el " include all tiu^ 
 wickc'd, and " his saints "all His j)eople. Neither is 
 this judj^ment upon the wicked a tempoiary and tem- 
 poral one: but is an "eternal destruction" which 
 must be final. Neither can there be any doubt that 
 the reward of the ri^liteous is etjually tinal and ever- 
 histin^. As the wicked who are judged include the 
 dead persecutors of the saints at Thessalonica, and as 
 none believe that the unrighteous receive their final 
 judgment in sections, but all agree that they are 
 all judged tof^ether, this, as it includes some of the 
 wicked dead, must include them all. This is a fair 
 and unforced interpretation, and is concurred in by 
 

 THE IMl()(j}UE.S.S OF THE UOSrEL. 
 
 225 
 
 It is while tliUH i'.\alt«Ml, and from tlie Hoat wliic'h He 
 now 0('CU|)i«'H, tlial tlicso scjvon'i^ii powers are to bo 
 diHpenHod to nion, Wliih; I*etor does not iloclare that 
 it is only from His present mediatorial throne this will 
 be done, the lanj^ua^e is alto«^etlier out of harmony 
 with the thout^ht that but little, comparatively, of the 
 dispensin*^ of repentance and panlon will be done 
 until He has left His place at CJod's ri«;ht hand. It is 
 in tlie strictest agreement with the belief that all the 
 dispensin<^ of His ^race will be dotie before He leaves 
 this seat, and when He does leave it, human proba- 
 tion is at an end. 
 
 In this connection, we must refer a<^ain to Heb. 
 10 : 12, 13, " But he, when he had ofiered one sacrifice 
 for sins forever, sat down on the ritrht hand of God, 
 from henceforth expecting till his enemies be made 
 the footstool of his feet." 
 
 This passage is in strictest harmony with Acts 5: 31, 
 just considered. Our Lord, after offering himself on 
 the cross as the one sacrifice for sins, sat down at 
 God's right hand as Prince and Saviour, to dispense 
 repentance and forgiveness. From the time that He 
 takes this exalted seat of power, He expects or awaits, 
 as the word really means, until, through the progress 
 of this work of repentance and forgiveness which 
 continues in connection with the preaching of the 
 Gospel, His enemies shall finally become subject to His 
 sway. If we say that this passage refers to the 
 crushing of His enemies by omnipotent power, rather 
 than subduing their hearts by the power of the 
 Gospel, we have to suppose the writer of Hebrews, in 
 15 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
38 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 the Greek : for there is no respect of person.s witli 
 God. For as many as liave sinned without hiw sliall 
 also perish without law : and as many as have sinned 
 under law shall be judged by law ; for not the hear- 
 ers of a law are just before God, but the doers of a 
 law shall be justified ; for when Gentiles, which have 
 no law, do by nature the thinj^s of the law, these, hav- 
 uitr no law, are a law unto themselves ; in that they 
 show the work of the law written in their hearts, 
 till'"'- consciences bearin<( witness therewith, and their 
 t juj^hts one with another accusing or else excusinj^ 
 them : in the day when God shall judge the secrets of 
 men, according to my gospel, by Jesus Christ." 
 
 This is to happen at " the day of wrath and revela- 
 tion of the righteous judgment of God," v, 5, " in that 
 day when God shall judge the secrets of men, accord- 
 ing to my gospel, by Jesus Christ." It is then " he 
 will render to every man according to his deeds," v. 6, 
 not to the righteous according to their good works 
 only ; but to the wicked also according to their deeds. 
 It is not a judgment of a part of either class ; for it is 
 " upon every soul of man that doeth evil" and "every 
 man that worketh good," and it is when God sliall 
 judge the secrets of men — all men. It is not spoken 
 of those only who shall be alive when that time comes ; 
 for it was to include those Paul was addressing, as 
 well as all wlio were to come after. Let the reader 
 give this passage careful consideration, noting espe- 
 cially how the apostle includes both good and bad in 
 one common judgment, referring back and forth from 
 righteous to wicked and w^icked to righteous ; and he 
 
THE (iENEUAL JUDGMENT. 
 
 39 
 
 will tiiid it more tlian difficult to })elieve that in tlius 
 ("•oiui: back and fortli from one class to the other he 
 has two separate judgments in mind, and is each time 
 passiiij^ back and forth across the grandcvst period of 
 the Cliurcli's history without the faintest intimation 
 of its existence. 
 
 Nor is this all. We have this same expression of 
 Honi. 2:0: " llender to every man according to his 
 deeds"; in Matt. 10: 27: "For the Son of man shall come 
 ill the glory of his Father, with his angels, and then 
 shall he render to every man according to his deeds." 
 Just as in Rom. 2 : 0, so here " every man " refers to 
 all men universally and of both classes, as tlie con- 
 nection makes evident. This judgment — this distri- 
 bution of destiny according to deeds — all of it, and 
 for both classes, is to take place " then " when the 
 Son of man shall come, etc. Can we believe that our 
 Lord intended the event described in this succinct 
 statement to be rent into two perfectly distinct 
 transactions, separated b}'^ the great millennial period? 
 How can we venture to declare that this "then" 
 covers all this stretch of years, and that "he shall 
 render to every man," etc., describes more than a 
 single transaction ? 
 
 Still further, in Mark 8 : 38, a part of the same dis- 
 course as Matt. 16: 27, we read: "For whosoever 
 shall be ashamed of me and of my words, in this adul- 
 terous and vsinful generation, the Son of man shall be 
 ashamed of him, when he cometh in the glory of his 
 Father with the holy angels." This evidently refers 
 to the judgment of the wicked, just as the same 
 
40 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOGY. 
 
 expression in Matt. 10 : 82, 33 refers to the reward of 
 tlie righteous. This judgment of the wicked, then, is 
 said by our Lord to take place at His second coming. 
 It also includes the judgment of the wicked dead, for 
 those who were ashamed of Him, in the generation 
 living when He was upon earth, were to share in it. 
 If our Lord's coming, then, is to be pre-millennial, so 
 must the judgment of the wicked dead be as well as 
 that of the righteous. Could our Lord have thus 
 spoken were the wicked not to be judged "when" He 
 was to come in the glory of His Father, but ages 
 after that glorious event? When, therefore, we read, 
 Matt. 7 : 22, 23: "Many will say to me in that day, 
 Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy by thy name, and by 
 thy name cast out devils, and by thy name do many 
 mighty works ? And then will I profess unto them, I 
 never knew you : depart from me, ye that work iniq- 
 uity." " In that day " refers to the day when our Lord 
 " Cometh in the glory of his Father," etc., mentioned 
 in Matt. 16 : 27 and Mark 8 : 38, and describes scenes 
 in the judgment of the wicked at His coming, not 
 centuries after. So also Matt. 10: 32, 33: "Every one, 
 therefore, who shall confess me before men, him will 
 I also confess before my Father which is in heaven: 
 but whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I 
 also deny before my Father which is in heaven," is to 
 be fulfilled at the same time "when he cometh," etc. 
 Then "every one," "whosoever," not those merely 
 who are alive when He appears, shall be welcomed or 
 rejected. For Mark 8: 38 specifies the time when 
 the wicked are rejected, and here we find that the 
 
THE UENKHAI. .JUlKi.MENT. 
 
 41 
 
 IS 
 
 lit'liteouH receive their welcome when the wicked are 
 lejrcted — at our Lord'H second coming. Thus all 
 tliese passaj^es are in beautiful harmony with each 
 otlKT and with Matt. 25 : 31 sq.] 2 Thess. 1 : 6-10, 
 Kev. 20: 11 sv/., Rom. 2: 5-16, and unite their testi- 
 mony in support of a sin^^le judgment of the right- 
 eous and the wicked, not of two distinct judgments 
 separated by the millennial period. 
 
 Acts 17:31: "Inasmuch as he hath appointed a 
 day in wliich he will judge the world in righteous- 
 ness." " The world " can mean nothing less than all 
 mankind. This is to be judged on " a day " appointed 
 by God. This day, then, be it a long or a short period, 
 nmst, at least, be an unbroken and continuous period 
 of judgment, and not two periods separated by the 
 niillennium, which is the very antipodes of a time of 
 judgment. 
 
 The same teaching is found in a number of the 
 I)arables. Take the parable of the pounds (Luke 19 : 
 12-27), and that of the talents (Matt. 25 : 14 sq.). 
 Even if we restrict these to the professed servants of 
 Christ, the faithful and the unfaithful, the good and 
 the wicked, they are judged at the same time, and re- 
 ceive their reward and condemnation together, in the 
 course of a single, unbroken judgment. Notice al 'o 
 the parable of the tares (Matt. 13: 30, 38 4'>^. ihis 
 parable refers to the continued relation betwoeii the 
 righteous and the wicked from the introduction of 
 evil unto the " end of the world." If anything is here 
 plainly taught, it is that the evil and the good shall 
 exist together until the " end of the world," and that 
 
■^ 
 
 42 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCllAT(JLOtJY. 
 
 then, and only then, .sliall thore be a separation as 
 complete as it is final ; as the wicked meet their doom 
 and the ri<;liteous receive their rewnrd. All airree 
 that this time when Christ is to send forth FIiHan<(els 
 — this end of the world — is at our Lord's second com- 
 in<(. Pre-millennialists assume that this parable 
 describes what takes place before the millennium, and 
 ur^e it in favor of another feature of their Ijelicif 
 which will be considered later on. But how can it be 
 held that this final and complete separation takes ])lace 
 then ? Most Pre-millennialists hold that the fijreatest 
 triumphs of salvation are to happen after our Lord 
 comes. Now if all the tares (the wicked) are separated 
 forever from the ri<^hteous, as declared in this parable, 
 at a pre-millennial coming of our Lord, there are no 
 wicked people left on the earth to be saved. If the 
 language used by our Lord means anything, it seems 
 to show that, at the period referred to, grace is past 
 and judgment begun. Besides, on any pre-millennial 
 theory, the difficulty remains that the evil and the 
 righteous are not finally and completely separated 
 until after the millennium : for, at its close, there is an 
 uprising of wickedness which shows that it had never 
 been completely eradicated. The final and complete 
 separation does take place after the close of the thou- 
 sand years. If, therefore, it is at our Lord's second 
 coming that this final and utter separation takes 
 place, His coming is post-millennial, in connection 
 with a judgment of both righteous and wicked. 
 
 We have, in this chapter, sought to give the most 
 natural interpretation of the most explicit passages 
 
THK (JENEllAL JUIXJMEXT. 
 
 43 
 
 rclcrriii^ to tho judgment oF the two gratii classes of 
 iMiinkind, ns in tl»(3 previous one we considered the 
 jwisHiiges bearin<jf most directly upon the resurrection, 
 .lust as in that chapter we found tau*^ht a siuf^le resur- 
 rection, includinj^ both ri<rhteous and wicked, so, in 
 tiiis chapter, we find a sinf^le jud«;nient of all men at 
 the coming of the Lord plainly and repeatedly de- 
 clared. Whether this jud«;ment be short or lon<^, it is 
 a single, unbroken, stupendous event. Let our pre- 
 inillennial brethren re<;ard thejud<]jnient of the right- 
 eous as declaring their comparative rewards, according 
 to their works and not their destiny, if they will. All 
 the same, if this judgment, whatever it be, is but a 
 part of the general judgment, including the wicked as 
 well, it is fatal to their theory. The coming of the 
 Lord and the judgment of the righteous are in connec- 
 tion with the judgment of the wicked, which all admit 
 is after the millennium and at the end of the world. 
 
m^ 
 
 44 
 
 A STUDY IN esciiatolo(;y. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE VIEWS COMPARED. 
 
 pRK-MlLLENNlALlSTSwouklset asido all this evidence 
 from the most explicit passages bearing upon the 
 questions at issue. Tliey would rend both the resur- 
 rection and the judgment of the rightnous from the 
 resurrection and judgment of the wicked by the inter- 
 jection of the millennial period, and that of tlie great 
 uprising of wickedness. Before proceeding to consider 
 the grounds upon which the teaching of all these ap- 
 parently plain passages is ignored, it may be well to 
 place the two views as to the resurrection and judg- 
 ment of the righteous and the wicked side by side in 
 general comparison. The reader will then be better 
 able to judge of the genertil impression they respec- 
 tively make. 
 
 The view of Post-millennialists is very simple. They 
 believe that all the dead are raised at the coming of 
 the Lord, and all the righteous living are changed. 
 Then all, righteous and wicked, risen and alive, are 
 judged and enter upon their eternal reward or doom. 
 The resurrection takes place after all who are to die 
 have died. The judgment takes place after all men 
 have had their probation, and all action upon which 
 
 % 
 
THE VIEWS roMPAREn. 
 
 45 
 
 ju<l;4iiiciit is to be piiHsed, is iini.slu'*!. Docs not tliis 
 seem to 1)0 tho natural and appr()j)riat(! tinio for Ixjth 
 it'snrrcction and jud<;nient ^ Is this not the time we 
 would expect these <^reat events to happen, even if 
 the Scripture teaching upon the (piestio!! were less 
 (It'cisive ;* 
 
 Now let us compare with this the complicated 
 schcnie of our pre-millennial friends. I <]five it as out- 
 lined by ])r. J. H. Brookes, in " Maranatha," pp. o-l-o-O ; 
 \V. K. P>la('kstone, "Jesus is Comin<^," pp. 48-50 ; John 
 McNeil, " Kven So, Come " : 
 
 " IK'scent of the Lord to receive His bride (1 Thesa. 
 4: Kl); Resurrection of the just (Luke 14: 14) and 
 ('liantrc of living believers (I Cor. 1 ') : 23,51, 52); 
 Traiishition of the saints who are caught up to meet 
 ('luist and His bride (1 Thess. 4 : 17) ; The meeting of 
 Christ and His bride (1 Thess. 4 : 17) ; Period of un- 
 (Mnialied tribulation to the world (Malt. 24 : 21), during 
 which the Church having been taken out, God begins 
 to deal with Israel again, and will restore them to 
 their own land (Isa. 11 : 11, Acts 15 : 16); The vials 
 of God's wrath will be poured out (Rev. 6-19 chaps.); 
 Israel accepts Christ and are brought through the fire 
 (Zoch. 13 : 9) ; The revelation of Christ and His saints 
 in flaming fire tc execute judgment on the earth 
 (Jude 14, 15). This is Christ's second coming to the 
 earth (Matt. 24 : 24, 29, 30) ; Judgment of the nations 
 or the quick (Matt. 25 : 31-46) ; Antichrist is destroyed 
 (2 Thess. 2:8); The beast and the false prophet are 
 taken (Rev. 19: 20); God and His allies are smitten 
 (Ezek. 38, 39 chaps.); Satan is bound (Rev. 20: 1-3); 
 
WT 
 
 46 
 
 A STT'DY IN y 
 
 OT.OOY. 
 
 RoHurroctioii of tlu^ tribii ,n HJiints whidi coinpl«'t.<'s 
 tlio Kirst KcHurrcction (Hov. 20 : 4-0); The inilh'iuiiuin. 
 (yliriHt'.s ^MoriouH n'i;^n oil tlie ejirtli for oik; thouHiiiid 
 yoarH with His brido (Ren'. 20: 4); Satan looHt-d for a 
 littlo Heason and (Ui.stroyt'd with (io^an'l Ma^^og (Rev. 
 20: 7-10); The rcsuiTcction of ju<l<,niient (Rev. 20: 
 12-lo) ; ,Jud;L^inent of tlie throat white tlirone of all the 
 reniaininj^ dead (Rev. 20: 12-1')); Death and Hell 
 destroyed (R(iv. 20: 14); Eternity, or rather the rtiov/.s 
 tocomefKph. 2: 7)." 
 
 Aecordin^ to this outline, it will be noticed our 
 Lord first cornea for His people. All tlie righteous dead 
 are raised and all the rij^hteous who are alive are 
 " chan<(ed " and are caught up to^jether to meet the 
 Lord in the air. There they remain duriui; the irreat 
 tribulation on the eartli —some say seven years from 
 the; prophetic week of Dan. U: 27, others think it lasts 
 lon^xer. Then Christ descends to the earth with His 
 saints, and the rij^hteous who have died duiin<^ this 
 period are raised from the dead. The millennial 
 period follows, during which people continue to be 
 born and die. It would seem that the righteous, for 
 it is held that righteousness is universal, cannot bo 
 translated at conversion in childhood, or the race 
 would not continue. They must either die, or receive 
 their resurrection body without dying, after they 
 have done their part in propagating the race. So 
 there must be a resurrection at the close of the millen- 
 nium for these, or a continuous process of " changing " 
 during all this period. The wicked dead are all raised 
 totrether as the final resurrection act. 
 
THE VIEWS rOMPAUED. 
 
 47 
 
 Now, \H not tins a complicated hcIkmiio an to tlio 
 rt'surrt'ction of tlu' (load ^ Dot's tli(^ ;^L'ueral iin])ros- 
 si(^ii of Sciipturc toachiii;^ favor this view, or tlio 
 siinplo post-inilicnnial conception of that ^jrand event 
 j^'ivon ahove i When the Scriptnri! passa^c^s urf^«'d in 
 favor of it are exanuned, they are fonnd to he detached 
 and, tlu! most of them, of the ohscure kind ahont 
 whose correct interpretation tliere has always been 
 diniht, while some of the less obscure do not seem to 
 have rticeived their most natural (explanation. So 
 evident is this that Dr. Gordon admits " we have never 
 met this startling doctrine of two distinct resurrec- 
 tions, with a millennium between, till we reach the 
 last book in the Bible,"* and, it may bo added, not 
 until near the chjse of this book, and that in a very 
 obscure; passa^je of three verses. He also adds, " There 
 is, perhaps, no doctrine of Scripture the references to 
 which are at once so compl(;mental of each other as 
 this doctrine of two resurrections," althoui^h he thinks 
 it made out by scattered allusions in connection with 
 Rev. 20 : 4-0. 
 
 Notice also the scheme for the judgments. The 
 first is that of the righteous, to distribute rewards 
 according to their works. This takes place while the 
 saints are in the air, during the great tribulation upon 
 the earth. The second is of the nations when He 
 comes to the earth with His saints. There must be a 
 third, of the tribulation saints, as they have a separate 
 resurrection after the judgment of the other dead and 
 
 * " Kcce Venit," p. 219. 
 
m' 
 
 48 
 
 A 8T1^1)V IN ESCHATOI.rxJV. 
 
 tlioHO who wore ulivc ami arc chani^rd, at His coininL' 
 lor His people, nniesH they hav(» no jinl;^meiit, a.s do 
 the others. Then there niu.st he a Tourth, Tor all the 
 Maint.s that are horn and live durintr the niillcnniuin 
 and the *;reat upriHin*.^ of wickedness, unle.sH they alwo 
 have no jtid^^inent. Finally, there is a fifth judgment, 
 that of all the unri^hteou.s at the end of the history 
 of the race on earth. Now, we venture to asHert, as 
 between this complicated scheme of jiid^nu'ntsand the 
 simple and grand conception of a sinnrle jiid^^ment of 
 all men at the end, which Post-millennialists hold, 
 there are few, if any, unhiass«Ml students who, hy a 
 readin<^ of the Hihle, would arrive at this complicated 
 view. 
 
 But the complicated scheme of resurrection and 
 jud<(ment not only seems opposed to the <j^eneral im- 
 pression made hy Scripture teaching as well as incon- 
 tra<liction to the plainest meaning of the passages 
 hearing most directly upon the (juestion, but it also 
 gives rise to all kinds of difficulties and inconsistencies. 
 
 Some of these have already been referred to and 
 others will be considered later. Successive resurrec- 
 tions, and judgments by instalments, before all who 
 are to be raised have died and before probation is 
 ended for all who are to be judged, are hard to recon- 
 cile with God's changelessness and tlie finality of Hi,s 
 doings. 
 
NO PUohATlON AhTKIl (11 HIST «<»MES. 
 
 4! I 
 
 CHAPTKR IV. 
 
 NO I'ltOHATlON AFTKU CHRIST COMKS. 
 
 The tliird direct antithesis between the views of 
 the Pre- and Pcjst-niillenni.ilists to be brought to the 
 testing of (iod's Word is tlio followin*^ : 
 
 Post-niilleniiialists hold that tlie propagation of the 
 race ceases at tiie second coming of the Lord, and tliat 
 tlie day of probation and salvation tlien closes. From 
 that glorious and dread time men will no longer con- 
 tinue to be born and live und die, and it will be too late 
 to seek and find salvation. From the instant that the 
 radiance of His appearing flashes over land and sea, 
 the history of the race in the flesh closes, and there 
 will be no change of moral condition or destiny ; but 
 the eternal future of all will be fixed for weal or woe. 
 The Church shall not thereafter receive enlargement, 
 but complete with the fulness of the redeemed, sliall 
 enter into the everlasting joy of her Lord. 
 
 On the other hand, while a small section of Pre- 
 niillennialists believe that the wicked will be exter- 
 minated when our Lord comes, the great body of them 
 hold that the race will continue in the flesh, and the 
 period of probation and salvation keep right on after 
 our Lord has come again. Nay, all but a very 
 4 
 
r>0 
 
 A STUDY IV KSCHATOLOOy. 
 
 Hinall M«>(!(inii Itclirve it iH only after Mis coniinj^ tliat 
 tlic (InHpcl is to havi' itH ^rciit triiiniplis in Inuliii;^ 
 the ))ulk of iMiuikind to Nulvation. Tiitil then t)i<> 
 worl«l is to j^row worHc and worse, until evil cul- 
 minates in the antichrist, wliuin ("hrist iH to (Usstroy 
 at His coining;. Then, through the as.sertion of llin 
 nii;;)»t in personal pres«'nce, the world, which has l)een 
 jjrowinj; worse an<l worse to its tiu'rihie and evil cul- 
 mination, will 1k^ hron^^ht to Mis feet, and H(> shall 
 rei^n over the earth in milleimial j^lory. For a thou- 
 Hand years — Home hold for thre«» hundred and sixty- 
 five thousand years — this glorious era Ih to continue, 
 those who are horn heing convertetl in childhood. 
 The number of the saved, instead of })ein«r complete at 
 Christ's comiuj^, is to enlarge during all this stretch of 
 time, in this heyday of the (lospel, hy virtually the 
 whole tide of life which keeps Hooding across the 
 earth. 
 
 Let us hring the constitu(Mit elements of these 
 clearly defined and opposing beliefs to the testing of 
 God's Word. 
 
 1. Is the race to continue in the llesb after our 
 Lord comes? Will children contiinie to le born and 
 live and die, for at least a thousand years, jifter this 
 grand event? Nay, as this is to be a period when 
 peace is unbroken, and all that militates against the 
 prosperity of men will be suppressed, it cannot but 
 be supposed that the race will be more prolific than 
 when under the blight and curse of sin. Is it the 
 teaching of the Word of God that the earth will be 
 crowded as never before with thronging myriads of 
 
 
NO IMMJHATION AKTKU CM HIST roMFS. 
 
 51 
 
 iiMii Mii<l wninrii ill tilt' llrsli, t\\'U'r th(^ m'Coiitl coining 
 of till' lionl f 
 
 Kii'Mt ol' iill, liow can tliiN vi(;w ho reconciliMl witli 
 2 IN'tur M : M-IU ^ OliHorvo i'M|M'cijilly v. 7 : " I'ut tlio 
 )i(>av(>iiN that ur<> now, and tho oarth hy thu NJitno 
 word, havn hoon storod up for fln», hrinj^ nwrvod 
 a;;ainHt tho (hiy of ju<l;^niirjitaiid doHtniction of un^^odly 
 iiH'ii ; " V. 10: " Hut tho i lay of tho Lord will conio an 
 a tliirf, in tlio which tho hoavons .shall pass away with 
 a ;jroat lunm* and tho ohtniontH .shall ho dissolvod witli 
 forvont hoat, and tho oarth and tin; works that aro 
 tlioroin shall ho hurnod up;" and v. 12, " Lookin;^ for 
 and earnostly dosirinj; the coming of tho day of (»o<l, 
 hy roason of which tho hoavons hoin;^ on tiro shall ho 
 di.s.solvod, and tho olcnioiits shall iiirlt with forvi^nt 
 lu'at." 
 
 Now, wliat is i\w. luittiral ititorprotation of tliifl 
 pas.sa^o I In its connection is it not this ? To tiie 
 " iiiockors " who shall come " in tho I . :t days " (v. *}), 
 an<l who wilfully for«;et the destruction hy tho flood 
 and scotHn^ly ask, " Where is the promise of his 
 cominjTi'" (v.s. 4-()), the day of judj^mont and destruc- 
 tion of unjjfodly men (v. 7), this " day of the Lord " with 
 its <loHtruction — now hy tire instead of water — will 
 come as a " thiof in the night" (v. 10), in like surpris- 
 ing suddenne.ss. There is no warning any more than 
 there was to the antediluvians. Now, at what time 
 is this conflagration to occur / Paul doubtless refers 
 to tho same dread day in 2 The.ss. I : 7, 8, and declares 
 it to be " at the revelation of the Lord Jesus from 
 heaven with the angels of liis power," that he, " in 
 
\\ 
 
 52 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOUHJY. 
 
 - ' I 
 
 flaming Hre," renders "vengeance! to them that know 
 not God, and to them that obey not the gospel." 
 This, tlien, ia to take place at the second comin<r of 
 our Lord. Besides, it is hard to see how there could 
 be scoffers who would say, " Where is the promise of 
 his comin<( ? " after our Lord had come and raised the 
 ri«^hteous tlead and translated those wlio were alive, 
 and right in the face of our Lord's personal reign over 
 the earth. 
 
 This contiagration, then, is to take place at the com- 
 ing of the Lord, and before the millennium, if His 
 coming is pre-millennial. This has not only been 
 admitted but assumed by the great body of Pre- 
 millennialists in the past. It is also unhesitat- 
 ingly held by all to-day who believe that the Lord 
 will destroy all the wicked at His coming, and end 
 the life in the flesh. It can be denied by none except 
 at the expense of the very plain meaning of the pas- 
 sage. But all who believe the race is to continue in 
 the flesh during the millennium have a great difficulty 
 to face. It is to explain how the living could survive 
 the flames of that day, " when the elements shall be 
 dissolved with fervent heat, and the earth and the 
 works that are therein shall be burned up." The 
 attempts that have been made to meet it are as 
 various as they are futile. Here are some of them. 
 The conflagration is to be but partial, extending only 
 to the limits of the Roman territory. The rest of the 
 races survive and people the earth during the mil- 
 lennium. But surely " the earth and the works that 
 are therein " means all the earth. The conflagration 
 
NO PIIOHATIOX AFTER CHRIST COMES. 
 
 63 
 
 is not to be contemporaneous over all the earth, and 
 thuH a chance will be ^iven for some to escape. There 
 will be a less searchin<x conflafjration ut the be^jinninj; 
 of the millennium, throu<,'h which some live, and the 
 fierce dissolving one is at its close, etc., etc* Hlack- 
 stone f places it after the judgment of the wicked, 
 thus extending the day of the Lord beyond the last 
 judgment. But the "mockers" Peter speaks of are 
 to be surprised as by "a thief in the night" by the 
 burning day. How, then, can they be surprised by 
 this day, if it does not come until after they are 
 judged and have passed to their final doom ? Upon 
 whom can this day come "as a thief" after the judg- 
 ment ? 
 
 May we not submit that all the attempts to evade 
 this difficulty are makeshifts and pure assumptions, 
 and have no weight against the natural interpretation 
 of the passage ? This conflagration is at the coming 
 of the Lord, and it ends the life of the race in the 
 flesh. If the Lord comes before the millennium, then 
 there is no continuance <~ i the race in the flesh durinf; 
 the millennium, as Scripture teaches. The idea that 
 this grand period stretches onward from the coming 
 of the Lord, rather than precedes it, is erroneous. 
 
 2. Does probation continue after the Lord's second 
 coming ? The Pre-millennialist answers " Yes," the 
 Post-millennialist " No." Which view is favored by 
 the plain teaching of the Bible ? 
 
 Let us weigh the bearing upon this question of 
 
 * Brown, "The Second Advent," p. 273 ftq. 
 t Blackstone, " Jesus is Coming," p. 137. 
 
w 
 
 ' 
 
 54 
 
 A STHDY IN KSCIIATOLOfiV. 
 
 some paHsa^cH already refcrrcil to in another con- 
 nection. 
 
 "All the nations " hIuiU be gathered before our Lord, 
 when He "shall come in his glory " (Matt. 25 : .*U sq.). 
 What rii^ht has anyone to assume that " all the na- 
 tions " here means but a part of them and less than 
 all men, anv more than to assume that " make dis- 
 ciples of all the nations" (Matt. 28: 19) means make 
 disciples of a part only of mankind? But "all the 
 nations " — all men — are here declared to enter upon 
 their final and eternal reward or punishment at our 
 Lord's" coming in glory." Probation then ends for- 
 ever. 
 
 " Them that know not God " and " them that obey 
 not the gospel " (2 Thess. 1 : 8) are evidently compre- 
 hensive expressions including all the unsaved. But 
 these are all to " suffer punishment, even eternal de- 
 struction, when he shall come," etc. (vs. 9, 10). Pro- 
 bation then ends for all the unsaved. 
 
 Tn the parable of the tares (Matt. 13 : 24-33, 38-43) 
 at " the harvest " at " the end of the world " or age, 
 which our pre-millennial brethren admit to be at our 
 Lord's coming, "the tares are to be gathered in bundles 
 to burn them," and the " wheat into the barn " (v. 30). 
 Neither the tares nor the wheat continue to grow in 
 the field — the race in the flesh continues no longer. 
 Our Lord explains the tares to mean " all things that 
 cause stumbling and them that do iniquity," and they 
 are to be "cast into the furnace of fire" (vs. 41, 42), 
 The time of probation for " them that do iniquity " 
 ends with their final destruction at our Lord's cominsf. 
 
 
"^«p^ 
 
 NO PROBATION AFTER CHRIST COMES. 
 
 55 
 
 In 2 Thess. 2:3-12 there is a description of tlie devel- 
 opment of an evil power apparently embodied in a 
 person, whom the Lord Jesus shall " slay with the 
 breath of his mouth, and bring to nought by the 
 manifestation of his coming." No one can read this 
 whole passage and not be impressed with the convic- 
 ti(jn that Paul regarded the coming of the Lord as 
 the dividing point between the reign of grace for 
 siiniors and their final doom. 
 
 The teaching of several other parables is to the 
 same effect. Take that of the ten virgins (Matt. 
 25 : 1-13). Let this refer to whom ^'t may, it was too 
 late, after the bridegroom came, for preparation to 
 enter into the marriage feast. Only those who were 
 ready when he came had this blessed privilege. The 
 door was shut to all others. Also the parables of 
 the talents and the pounds (Matt. 25 : 14-30 s(]., 
 Luke 19 : 12-27). 
 
 When the lord of the servants cometh, it is to 
 reckon with them, not to allow longer time so that 
 the past neglect and unfaithfulness may be retrieved. 
 The faithful receive their reward and the unfaithful 
 tlieir punishment. The plain teaching seems to be, 
 in all of these, that the coming of the Lord ends pro- 
 bation — that after He comes, do change from a lost to 
 a saved condition takes place. 
 
 Several other lines of Scripture teaching corrobo- 
 rate the view that probation ends at the coming of 
 the Lord. 
 
 The work of discipling the nations, with the ordi- 
 
; 
 
 86 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOOY 
 
 nances of the Gospel, continues only until our Lord 
 conies. 
 
 This is taught in the great coniniission (Matt. 
 28: 18-20): " All authority hath been given unto nie 
 in heaven and on earth. Go ye therefore, and make 
 disciples of all the nations, baptizing them. . . . 
 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I 
 commanded you : and lo, I am with you alway, even 
 unto the end of the world." 
 
 Why does our Lord say " I am with you alway, 
 even unto the end of the world " ? Is He not to be 
 with them forever? Do not our pre-millennial brethren 
 believe He is to be with His people on earth, after 
 " the end of the world " (which they say means of 
 this present age), in the millennium in the more inti- 
 mate and helpful bodily presence ? Does this not 
 mean that He will be with His people in the ivork of 
 making discvples " alway " as long as this work is 
 to continue, and that it is to continue " until the end 
 of the world " or age, which Pre-millennialists declare 
 to be the time of His second coming ^ He is said to 
 be with them no longer in this capacity as their 
 almighty helper, simply because this work is then to 
 be completed and end ? If our Lord is to continue 
 with His people as their helper in this very work, 
 after the end of the world or age, if then He is to 
 manifest His power to aid His people to make disciples 
 of the nations, as never before, could He possibly have 
 used these words ? 
 
 In 1 Cor. 11 : 26 it is also said that believers are to 
 show forth the Lord's death in the Supper " till he 
 
NO PIlonATION AFTER CIIUIST COMES. 
 
 57 
 
 conic," meaning that after His coming' its celebration 
 is to cease. 
 
 The same is tau^jht in Heh. 9 : 24-28. Christ has 
 entered " into heaven itself, now to appear before the 
 face of God for ns " (v. 24), after having " once at 
 the end of the a^es . . . been manifested to pnt 
 away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And inasnnieh 
 as it is appointed unto men once to die, an<l after this 
 Cometh jmlgment: so Christ also, havin*^ been once 
 offered to bear the sins of many, shall appear a second 
 time apart from sin, to them that wait for him, unto 
 salvation" (vs. 26-2cS). 
 
 Having accomplished His redemption " before the 
 face of God," then He is to come forth from His 
 place of mediation and appear a second time to men 
 on earth. The first time it was " to put away sin by 
 the sacrifice of himself." This time it is " apart from 
 sin " " unto salvation." Does not both the leaving of 
 uie place of mediation, as well as the expression 
 " apart from sin . . . unto salvation " in contrast 
 with His first coming " to put away sin," mean that 
 the provision and purpose of the redemptive woi-k of 
 His first coming shall have been completely realized 
 in reference to salvation, when He comes again ? 
 
 It is also taught that the number of the saved ^ 
 will be complete at our Lord's coming. 
 
 1 Cor. 15: 22, 23 ought to be conclusive. " For as in 
 Adam all die so also in Christ shall all be made alive. 
 But each in his own order : Christ the firstfruits, 
 then they that are Christ's at his coming." 
 
 Paul is speaking of believers in this chapter. All 
 
58 
 
 A STUDY IN EHCIIATOLCKIY. 
 
 who liavc ( liriHt jih their Hpiritual liea<l shall bo mado 
 alivo at His comiiijjf, juHt as through having Adam as 
 their natural head, thi^y all <lie. JuHt as surely as 
 Christ is the spiritual head of all who are ever to be 
 His through appropriating His work, so surely the 
 " all " of V. 22 and the " all that are his " of v. 28 
 include all that are ever to be saved by Him. These 
 are all to be raised " at his coming " in the grand 
 scene Paul ])roceeds to describe, and compared to 
 which the resurrection of our Lord is as the first- 
 fruits to the completed harvest. There is no room 
 here for the idea that only part of those who belong 
 to Christ as head are raised at His coming, or that 
 untold nmltitudes are added to their number after 
 that decisive event. Other Scriptures might be added 
 to establish this position ; but we forbear. 
 
 Thus we find that all related lines of Scripture tes- 
 timony unite in teaching that probation ends with 
 our Lord's second coming. We make bold to say that 
 a plain passage cannot be produced in favor of a con- 
 tinuance of probation after His coming. Reliance is 
 had by our pre-millennial friends upon obscure pro- 
 phetic teaching which is capable of a far different 
 interpretation, and upon inferences from their whole 
 system of teaching. But if there is no probation 
 after our Lord comes, then, unless none are to be 
 saved from the beginning of the millennium, our Lord's 
 coming must be after and not before that period. 
 
 III! 
 
' 
 
 UKVKI.ATION 20 : 4-6. 
 
 69 
 
 ClIAPTliR V. 
 
 
 IIEVKI.ATION 20: 4 (5. 
 
 No rule ol' hermeneuticH i.s more .sell'-evidcnt tlian 
 that tlie ol)Hcure paH.sa^es of Scripture hIiouM be 
 interpreted in luirniony witli the plain. To wrest the 
 plainer pa.s3a<ifes of Scripture from their most evident 
 nieanin<(, in order to force them into agreement with 
 a certain interpretation of an obscure passage, while 
 this very passage is capable of an interpretation in 
 perfect accord with the most evident meaning of a 
 large number of plain passages, is exegetical insanity. 
 It is because of this principle that we have felt our- 
 selves compelled to defer the consideration of Rev. 
 20 : 4-6, and certain obscure allusions upon which 
 Pre-millennialists depend «to support their general 
 theory, until the more explicit passages had been 
 examined. We assume, of course, that the Scriptures 
 thus far adduced are among tlie plainer teachings of 
 the Bible, and that Rev. 20 : 4-6 is one of the more 
 obscure passages. Does this need proof ? The pas- 
 sages we have referred to were almost all given in 
 direct discourse, and are in unfigurativc language. 
 The speaker or writer evidently thought those 
 addressed would understand his meaning. Apart 
 
' 
 
 GO 
 
 A STl'DY IN ESCHATOF.OCJV. 
 
 from any bias becauHo of theories of the millcnniuin, 
 tliore lias \nnii\ scarcely any (lisafj^reoinont among 
 interpreters as to tlieir meaning. On tlie other liand, 
 the wliole book of llevelation, at least after the 
 letters to the seven churches, has ever been regarded 
 OS obscure and ditticult of interpretation. It is the 
 language of figure and symbol. Not otdy have its 
 interpreters been divided into great general classes, 
 but they have disagreed upon points almost number- 
 less, as in the case of no other book in the New 
 Testament. 
 
 Neither is Rev. 20 : 4-G among the least obscure 
 parts in this book. Not only are interpreters divided 
 on the question whether it is to be understood liter- 
 ally or spiritually, but there is great diversity of 
 opinion both among the literalists and those who ex- 
 plain its meaning figuratively. Dr. Gordon thought 
 it included all the saints, as have the larger portion of 
 Pre-millennialists, in the past. Blackstone, Brookes, 
 McNeil, and a growing proportion of the Pre-millen- 
 nialists of the present, regard it as confined to what 
 they term the tribulation .saints, or such as die during 
 the great tribulation, the time between the so-called 
 rapture of the saints and our Lords return to the 
 earth with them. Others believe that the most emi- 
 nent of the confessors in all ages will share in this 
 resurrection. A similar diversity of view prevails 
 among those who interpret the passage figuratively. 
 Probably there is no other passage about which there 
 has been more difference of opinion. It is true that 
 many of our pre-millennial brethren think of both 
 
' 
 
 REVELATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 61 
 
 []\v hook of lU'velation, and this |uiMHarf(; ('.specially, 
 as anion;; tlio plain porfcionn of Scripture; but in view 
 of all this divergence of belief anion;; themaelves as 
 well a.s others, this claim is preposterous. 
 
 If, therefore, the ((Uestion be whether W(» shall 
 l)e;;in with Rev. 20 : 4-0 and interpret the passa;;es 
 liithcu'to adduced in harmony with one of the many 
 po.ssible views as to its meaning, even by doing 
 vioIcTice to their most evident sense, or whether wo 
 should begin with these passages a!ul make the con- 
 sensus of th(!ir unforced teaching the norm to judge 
 as to which of the many possible interpretations of 
 Rev. 20 : 4-0 is the correct one, the rule we referred 
 to at the beginning of this chapter recpiires us to do 
 the latter, and justifies us in the plan of treatment we 
 have adopted. 
 
 The only (juestion, then, is whether the plainer and 
 more explicit passages bearing on the (piestions under 
 discussion do teach a single and general resurrection, 
 a single and genei*al judgment, the end of the race in 
 the flesh, and the end of probation, at the second com- 
 ing of our Lord, or whether it is their teaching that 
 there are two, if not three, distinct and separate resur- 
 rections and judgments, and frit the race in the flesh 
 and probation do continue aiter His coming. The 
 reader must judge for himself whether it has been 
 made plain that the former and not the latter is their 
 teaching ; but this is what their natural and unforced 
 interpretation seems to me to declare with overwhelm- 
 ing explicitness and iteration. Believing, as I do, that 
 Scripture is never in conflict with Scripture, when 
 
fi2 
 
 A 8Tri)Y IN ESCIIATOl.OfJV. 
 
 corn'ctly undorstfKMl, tlic true iiitiTprrtatioii ol' Unv. 
 20: 4- (I must bo tlic; one wliicli lniii^.sitH tcacliiii;^ into 
 ucconl with that of tho n-Ht of the New 'IV'Htjiiiunit as 
 we have oxphiimid it. Apart altoj^ether from its 
 })oariTijnj on tlio (jucstion of tlic milh-nnium, candid 
 intcrprctors have cxphiinod it both as li^urativt; and 
 as htcral. This proves it to \hi capal)le of either a 
 ti<(iirativ(! or a literal interpretation. As tlie literal 
 interpretation would l)rin<^ it into conflict with what 
 appiears the unforced nieaninj^ of whole classes of 
 explicit passafi^eH thus far adduced, I am compelled 
 to explain it figuratively. Hut, even if it were other- 
 wise, oujjfht we not to be willinj^ to accept a less satis- 
 factory explanation of this oneobscune passage, rather 
 than consent to wrest all these plain passages from 
 their natural and evident meaning ? 
 
 Let us read Rev. 20 : 4-6 : 
 
 " And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and 
 judjjfment was <i;iven unto them ; and I saw the souls 
 of them that had been beheaded for the testimony of 
 Jesus, and for tlie word of Ood, and such as wor- 
 shipped not the beast, neither his ima<^e, and received 
 not the mark upon their forehead and upon their 
 hand ; and they lived and reigned with Christ a 
 thousand years. The rest of the dead lived not until 
 the thousand years should be finished. This is the 
 first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath 
 part in the first resurrection ; over these the second 
 death hath no power ; but they shall be priests of God 
 and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand 
 years." 
 
 
RFA'ELATrON 20 : 4-G. 
 
 \jot it Tint )>o for^nttrii lliiit (IiIh \h tlio only <liruct 
 jKiH.sji;;^ of Scriptun' ur;^«Ml in fuvor of tlio two rrsiir- 
 n;ctionH, willi the niill(>nniuni lu'tvv('(>n, and involving 
 the hoiiof in two Hcpunite ju<l^nu>ntH, luxi tlie con- 
 tiiuuince of tho rac»' in the flesh and of probation 
 after our Lord coinoH. Dr. (Jordon frankly iidniits 
 this in the <iueHtion : " Hut how is it wo have ncvur 
 mot this startli!J«r doetrino of two <listin('t rosurrec- 
 tion8, with a inillenniuin between, till we reacii tlio 
 last book of tho liible T' While lu; claims that this 
 doctrine has been met in other parts of the Scripture, 
 he was unable "to «leHne it" until this passa^^o is 
 reached, and he adds, later on, " There is, perhaps, no 
 doctrine of Scripture, the references to which are at 
 once 80 fra<;mentary and ho complemental of each 
 other as this doctrine of two resurrections."* 
 
 Dr, Brookes .says : " We come now to the well- 
 known passaj^e which distinctly asserts the doctrine "-f* 
 (of the two resurrections), tacitly concedin<( that this 
 is the only Scripture which "distinctly as.serts" it. This 
 means that this doctrine could never have been drawn 
 from the liible without the help of this pu.ssa^e ; in 
 other words, that this pa.ssage is indispensable to the 
 theory of two resurrections with all it involves. Now, 
 Pre-millennialista deem this doctrine of two resurrec- 
 tions of vast moment. Does it not seem strange that 
 BO very important a doctrine should have been left to 
 depend for its revelation upon a single passage in 
 almost the last chapter of the most difficult book of 
 
 # (I 
 
 Ecce Venit," pp. 219, 228. t " Maranatha," p. 66. 
 
04 
 
 A 8Tirr)Y r\ k.sciiatoi,o<jv. 
 
 i\ui llil)l«? ? VVc sliuiiltl ut Irant «'X|M'ct that MiIh one 
 hri«<f paMsa;^**, wliicli was to Hprv<« ho iiioiiwutouH a 
 |»ur|K)S(%Hln)ul<l hi' one ot* eryHtjil cli'JiriM'HR. It is sale 
 to 8iiy tluit no otluT important «l()C'trin»* of Scripture 
 iH left to <l«'p(Mul for its revelation upo!i a sin^jle p»VH- 
 sagc, liowever clear it may be. Mucli less mi^^lit we 
 expect tlie one iiKlisprnHahlc pasHa^jr itself to he ho 
 ol)H('iin' tluit honest interpreters have «litren'<l so 
 widely as to its meanin<^, and to he' found in a l»ook 
 Ro full of strange and mysterious ima;^«'ry. Can wc 
 heli»!ve sucli a passaj^e as this was inten<led to he tlu^ 
 medium of the revelation of a doctrine so important 
 as this is deemed, and its one imlispensahlo hulwark { 
 Much less are wo justified in making one of the pos- 
 sible interpretations of this passage the centn; of a 
 j^reat system, around which the plainer teaching; of 
 the New Testament nuist be grouped, even if tlicy 
 imist be wrenclied away from the nu»anin<; which the 
 vast majority of interpreters suppose they convey, 
 liut let us examine the passage more carefully. 
 I. If this is tlie description of a b()«lily resurrection, 
 it is not of a resurrection of all the ri«^hteous dead. 
 
 Tlie words, "Tliem that had been beheaded for the 
 testimony of Jesus and for the word of Ood and such 
 as worshipped not the beast, neither his ima^e, and 
 received not the mark upon their forehead and upon 
 their hand," are evidently intended to restrict those 
 that " live and reij^n with Christ" to two classes. 
 Could such language be used to describe all the right- 
 eous dead that have ever lived ? The first class — 
 " them that had been beheaded " — are martyrs. Who 
 
UEV ELATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 05 
 
 ciMiMtitutc tln' srcoiHl ? ** SiK'h JiH w<)r.slii|»jn'<l not tin* 
 ln'iiMt," t'tc. 'I'liis is iimdt' clt'iir l»y Ki'V. : !)-l I, wln'itf- 
 iii tli«^ first (>ltiss is (l(>N('i'il>«'(i uiiiioHt in idi'iitical t«'rniM 
 — " tln'in that lia<l Ix'cn slain I'or tlu' won! of (}<mI, an«l 
 fortius tostinionv wliicli tlu'V lu'M." 'I'lu'so an' askrd 
 "to roHt y«'t for a littlo tiim*, until tlunr f(»llo\v-H»'r- 
 vants also an<l their hn'thrm, which shoiiM hv killed, 
 even as they wer«', should he fultilled," heforc th« 
 Lord HhouM ".I'I'IK'' "^'"' Hven;^e their hlocxl." The 
 secorul clasH included in Kev. 20: 4 are those rel'erred 
 to in c!»ap. tl : 0-1 1 as still to be slain. This is appjir- 
 ent from the correspondence hetvveen tlu' description 
 — "such as worshipped not the beast," etc. — and tho 
 account of the ])ersccutions whicli are said to burst 
 out in connection with tho beast an<l his inia^e, 
 in the chapters between Kev, 6 : 9, and Rev. 20. 
 Notice especially cliap. l.'i : lo, where it is Raid, "It 
 was j^iven unto him to ;;ive breath to it, even to the 
 inui^e of the beast, tliat the inui;je of the beast sliould 
 both speak, and cause that as many as .should not 
 worsliip the imaj^e of the bea.st shouM ])e killed." To 
 make Re>'. 20: 4-0 refer to all the ri;;hteous is to set 
 at nouj^ht the plainest intention of tlie most definite 
 lan<,niage, as well as the evident relati(ai of Rev. 6 : 
 0-1 1 and Rev. 20 : 4-G. As we iiave said, Pre-millen- 
 nialists are more and more adopting this restricted 
 interpretation as of the martyrs only. Forced by tlie 
 demands of their theory of a coming of Chri.st for 
 His people, and a subsequent coming with them, tliey 
 would restrict its meaning too much, and make it 
 refer exclusively to what they term the tribulation 
 5 
 
G6 
 
 A STTTDY IN ESr!HATOT.OOY. 
 
 < - 
 
 If! 
 
 ii 
 
 saints, or tho.sc; wlio " hwv. the trials of the times 
 between these two . i coinin<^s of our Lonl. Ihit 
 
 while Rev. 20 : 4-(l refers to two classes exclusively, 
 it evidently includes all these classes. While "such as 
 worshipped not the beast " may include those oidy 
 who lived immediately before the millennium, " them 
 that had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus 
 and for the word of God," or as in Rev. G : 9-11, " them 
 that had been slain for the word of God and the tes- 
 timony which they held," can only mean all that had 
 ever been slain for this reason. 
 
 Now, it' Rev. 20: 4-6 is to be interpreted liten»'Jy, 
 it requires us to face the difficulties involved in two 
 distinct resurrections of the righteous. It even then 
 leaves all the hosts of saved people who may die dur- 
 ing the millennium unprovided for, to be raised at 
 some other time or times. Now, how does this con- 
 ception square with the general teaching of the New 
 Testament as to the resurrection of the righteous ? 
 Take a few passages : 
 
 1 Cor. 15: 51, 52: "Behold I tell you a niystery : 
 We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in 
 a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last 
 trump ; for the trump shall sound, and the dead shall 
 be raised," etc. 
 
 1 Cor. 15 : 23 : "They that are Christ's at his com- 
 ing." 
 
 John 5 : 29 : "They that have done good unto the 
 resurrection of life." 
 
 1 Thess. 4: 14: "Them also that are fallen asleep 
 in Jesus will God bring with him." 
 
 f 
 
 I 
 
REVELATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 r.7 
 
 I Thess. 4. K; : " The .load in Clirist hIuiII uhv HiHt." 
 
 Tlu'so oxprcasioiiH, "the dead," "they that are 
 Christ'.s," "they that have done ^ood," "them that are 
 falhiii aslec^p in .lesus," "the dead in (^lirist," are all 
 perfectly ^(Mieral, and they are also used in connec- 
 tion with accounts of the resurrection, as of a .sin<^le, 
 and, for the most part, of an instantaneous, event. It 
 is difficult enough to attempt to rend the resurrection 
 of the ri<;hteous and the wicked asunder, hut to accej/i. 
 an interpretation of Kev. 20: 4, which recpiires us to 
 rend the resurrection of the righteous itself int(j frajj- 
 ments, against what seems the most explicit teaching 
 of tlie rest of the Hible, appears to me most unsafe. 
 The fact that there is not only not the remotest allu- 
 sion to any such fragmentary resurrection of the 
 righteous in the New Testament apart from the lit- 
 eral interpretation of Rev. 20 ; 4-6, but that the gen- 
 eral teaching of the plain passages of the New 
 Testament is directly aguinst this idea, forms the 
 strongest presum})tion against the correctness of such 
 literal interpretation of this passage. 
 
 2. The alternative presented is to have "part in the 
 first resurrection" or to be under the power of the 
 "second death" — to be east into the lake of tire. 
 
 The implication seems to be that all who do not 
 have part in the first resurrection here spoken of 
 must share in the second death. Now, if this is a lit- 
 eral resurrection, say, of all the righteous dead, until 
 the millennium, as Pre-millennialists have generally 
 held, then what about those who live during the mil- 
 lennium ? They do not share in this resurrection- 
 
r^ 
 
 ! 
 
 68 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 Must they be cast into the lake of fire ? If tlji.s resur- 
 rection is literal and of the martyrs only, the (IKliculty 
 becomes all the greater. 
 
 y. It is said, " The rest of the dead lived not, until 
 the thousand years should be finished." The natural, 
 if not the necessary, implication of this is that the 
 rest of the dead should live when the thousand years 
 should be finished. Now, what do we find at the end 
 of the thousand years ? Is it a literal resurrection of 
 the wicked dead ? Let us rea<l : "' When the thousand 
 years are finished Satan shall be loosed out of his 
 prison," etc. (vs. 7-10). It is a resurrection of wicked- 
 ness which has been virtually dead during the millen- 
 nium, and which now, under satanic impulse, dashes 
 itself in its last expiring throes against righteousness 
 and those who represent and embody it. If the resur- 
 rection of the martyrs here spoken of and of the 
 " rest of the dead" referred to be of the same char- 
 acter, as seems evident, then, as the resurrection of 
 the "rest of the dead" is not of the bodies of the 
 wicked, neither can that of the martyrs be physical. 
 
 4. If this passage refers to the physical resurrection 
 of the martyr dead, as the final act in the resurrection 
 of all the saints and their reign with Christ on the 
 earth, then we have to face a difficulty which to me 
 seems almost insuperable. Pre-millennialists suppose 
 that Christ, during the millennium, will, through His 
 personal and visible presence on the earth, manifest 
 transcendent power. Through this power, righteous- 
 ness not only shall prevail, but wickedness shall be 
 practically non-existent. With Him, and sharing His 
 
REVELATION 20 : 4-6. 
 
 (59 
 
 rule, will bo tlio glorified .saints in their resurrection 
 bodies, to be visible witnesses of His power winch had 
 raised them From the dead, and of the certainty that 
 all His words of promise or threatening must come to 
 pass. And y(^t, in an evangelized world, among those 
 who must be accpiainted with the very prophecy 
 which assured the overthrow of their uprising, in 
 presence of the glorified saints, and in the face of the 
 omnipotent and reigning Christ, as Ho had ruled in 
 personal j)resence and resistless power for generations 
 and generations, wicked men arise, as it would appear, 
 suddenly, and the strength of wickedness, in a little 
 time, assumes such proportions that its votaries "com- 
 pass the camp of the saints and the beloved city" — 
 the city of Jerusalem, where Christ and the glorified 
 saints have the seat of their rule — and fire must come 
 from heaven and devour them: or, as it would 
 appear, they would have swept the saints away and 
 triumphed. 
 
 Now, all this is not irreconcilable with the view of 
 the millennium which Post-millennialists hold. Right- 
 eousness prevails, not through the personal presence 
 of Christ in irresistible power after liaving raised the 
 righteous dead, but through such progress of the Gos- 
 pel as we observe to-day. There will be no personal 
 and. visible presence of the omnipotent Saviour, reign- 
 ing in mighty power with His glorified people in Jeru- 
 salem ; but righteousness will maintain its sway, as it 
 secured it, by the power of truth and moral inHuences. 
 There will be no memories handed down of the tre- 
 mendous display of majesty and might described in 
 
70 
 
 A STUDY IN E.S(!nAT()l-0(JY. 
 
 I 
 
 Matt. 25:31 si/.; for this ju«lj^inent i.s .still to bo. 
 Wliile ri<^liteouHii('HH will doininate the world, wicked- 
 iiesH will still exist, but in a suppressed state. In the 
 end, evil, which has been bccoinin<^ more inten.se as it 
 has maiutained itself in the face of the strongest moral 
 forces, and as it has been pent up, will burst forth in 
 a last strut^<ijle for supremacy over the earth, and 
 then those who are its representatives will meet their 
 iinal overthrow, as the Lord comes to raise the dead 
 anc jud^e all that have ever lived. 
 
 but to suppo.se there will ari.se such an insurrection 
 of the wicked in the teeth of the power which Pre- 
 millennialists assume will be displayed by a Chri.st 
 rulin<r in majesty an<l j^lory with His (jflorified saints 
 — to suppo.se men with knowledge of the scenes en- 
 acted at His coming (described in Matt. 25 : 31), and 
 with knowledge of the almighty power with which He 
 has been ruling for so long, will dash themselves 
 against His per.sonal might, as well as that of His 
 living and glorified saints — .seems to me well-nigh 
 incredible. In proportion to these difficulties will 
 be the objection to the interpretation which involves 
 them all. 
 
 5. As already remarked. Rev. 20 : 4-6 contains the 
 answer to the prayer of the martyrs recorded in Rev. 
 : 9-11. These are represented as crying "with a 
 great voice, saying, How long, O Master, the holy and 
 true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on 
 them that dwell on the earth ? . . . It was said unto 
 them, that they sliould rest yet for a little time, until 
 their fellow-servants also and their brethren, which 
 
UEVKLATIUX 20 : 4-0. 
 
 71 
 
 .sliouM be killed even as they were, Hhould be fulfilled." 
 In Rev. 20 : 4-G, the time for the fulfilment of this 
 promise has come, through the complement of the 
 martyrs being made up, and we see the "judgment " 
 prayed for " given to tliem " (v. 4). Now, if this pas- 
 sage is to be interpreted literally of niartyrs who have 
 been raised from tlie dead, then the judgment must be 
 upon those who dwelt upon the earth with them and 
 shed their blood (Rev. 6 : 10). But before all who 
 were to be slain from that time on, had been mar- 
 tyred, these persecutors had long since been dead, and 
 they are not to rise till the thousand years and the 
 last uprising of evil are over. How can judgment 
 and vengeance be executed upon those whose time for 
 judgment has not yet come ? 
 
 6. Pre-millennialists who interpret this passage 
 literally are compelled to connect it with the second 
 coming of our Lord. Yet the second coming of our 
 Lord is not hinted at in the remotest way, although 
 the coming of the angel to bind Satan is mentioned 
 (v. 1). Can we believe that the event which is to be 
 the grandest in the history of the world and the con- 
 summation of the ages — that which, according topre- 
 millennial interpretation, gives all its significance to 
 the whole narrative — would be left out ? Had John 
 seen our Lord descending to raise the dead in this 
 vision, can we believe he would have left this most 
 transcendent part of the vision unnoticed ? Some, 
 however, have sought to escape this difficulty by re- 
 ferring to Rev. 19: 11 sq., as a vision of our Lord's 
 personal coming to raise the righteous dead. How- 
 
72 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCIIATOl.OUY. 
 
 ever, I're-millennialiHts thoiiiHolves are far from agreed 
 upon tliis as the true interpretation of tliin Scripture. 
 Tlie imagery ditlerH alto^eth«'r from tlie descriptions 
 uniformly ^iviiu elsevvliere of His comin<;: Matt. 24 : 
 30 : " The Son of man comin^^ in the clouds of heaven 
 with power and ^reat ghjry ;" Matt. 25 : 31 : " When 
 the Son of man shall come in his glory and all the 
 angels with him, then shall he .sit on the throne of his 
 glory ; " 2 The.ss. 1:7: " The Lord Jesus shall be re- 
 vealed from heaven with the angels of his might, in 
 flaming fire ; " Matt. 26 : 64 : " Ye shall see the Son of 
 man sitting at the right hand of power and coming 
 on the clouds of heaven." If this pa.ssage refers to His 
 second coming, instead of raising the d(?ad when He 
 appears, a .series of grand and terrific events (.see Kev. 
 19 : 11-21) is to intervene between His advent and the 
 resurrection of the righteous, to which Rev. 20 : 4-6 is 
 supposed to refer. On the other hand, the Pre-millen- 
 nialists, who see in Rev. 20 : 4-6 a resurrection of 
 " tribulation saints " only, believe that the righteous 
 dead generally were caught up with the living saints 
 in " secret rapture " (juite a period before this le.sser 
 resurrection. They place His .second coming to awaken 
 the righteous dead generally before the pouring out 
 of the seven vials of the 16th of Revelation, and a long 
 time prior, therefore, to that described in Rev. 19: 
 11 «</. Finally, in Rev. 20:11 we have our Lord's 
 appearing for judgment described in language almost 
 identical with that of Matt. 25 : 31, thus making it ap- 
 parent that the same judgment is spoken of in both 
 passages. But in the latter passage, the judgment is 
 
1 
 
 IIKVKLATIOX 20 : 4-(;. 
 
 73 
 
 ill iinmrMlijitocoimection with His sccoiul advent ; and, 
 tlierefure, tlie second coming of our Lonl nni.st be in 
 imiiKMliate connection with Rev. 20: 11, not prior to 
 Rev. 20: 4-G, and Rev. 10: 11-21 must he a .synihohc 
 representation ol' .sonie part of the history of tlie 
 Cliurch prior to Hia personal coming. The fire 
 "coming down from lieaven " (Rev. 20: i)j and do- 
 vourin*^ tlie wicked in their last uprisinj^ is rather in 
 coniKiction with the Lord as He ap})ears in Ihimiufj 
 tire taking vent.(eance on His enemies (2 Tliess. 1 : 8), 
 7. If Rev. 20 : 4 refers to tiie post-resurrection 
 rei<;ning of all the saints " with Christ," wliy is it said 
 to be for one thousand years only ? To " him that 
 overcometh " (Rev. 3 : 21), our Lord says, " I will give 
 to sit down with me in my throne," and the promise 
 to all the saved in Rev. 22 : 5 is that "they shall 
 reign forever and ever " If it be said that it refers 
 exclusively to reigning on the earth, it may be replied 
 that the passage does not mention reigning on the 
 earth ; it is reigning " with Christ," apparently in tlie 
 most general sen.se in which saints reign with Him, if 
 this refers to their reign with Him after He comes 
 again. In any case, allowing that exclusive refer- 
 ence is to a reigning on earth, the implication is that 
 tlie saints shall reign on the earth only for a thou.sand 
 years, and the pre-millennial belief that the eai'th is to 
 be the eternal home of the redeemed is set asi<le. But 
 as has been shown, and as a very large proportion of 
 Pre-millennialists now admit. Rev. 20 : 4-6 refers to 
 the martyrs only. Are none but the martyrs to reign 
 with Christ in the post-resurrection state ? If not 
 
u 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCIIATMLCMJY. 
 
 wliy an» tlicy alono inontionorl nn sluirin*^ in IHm rule ? 
 Qut'.stioiiH will also Hri.so ii.s totlio .saints who arc lioni 
 and livt' during the niilh'iniiuni. Do they have no 
 Hhare in this n'ijrninir with Clirist ? 
 
 W(! thus find that the literal intcrpn^tation oi' this 
 ]>asHa^re is very far from tlie plain an<l ("asy matter 
 Pre-millennialists ev(!r assume it to be. It is encom- 
 ])ass('d with ditliculties of the most serious nature, if 
 they are not insuperaitlc. While we do not venture 
 to say that tlie H«^urative interpretation is witliout its 
 difficulties — the passage is too obscure to make a per- 
 fectly satisfactory explanation possible — it is hoped 
 that it may be made t(j appear, apart altogether from 
 the tremendous presumption against the literal inter- 
 ])retation afforded by the general teaching of tlie 
 New Testament, that there is less against and more 
 in favor of the figurative interpretation than of the 
 literal. 
 
 1. The most of Revelation, from the beginning of 
 chapter four to the end, is in the language of symbol 
 and figure. Take the vision of chapter four — the 
 elders, the lamps, the sea of glass, the beasts, are all 
 symbolical. The book with the seven seals, the Lamb 
 with the seven horns and eyes (chap. 5), are of the 
 same character, and the whole scene is to represent 
 truth of a larger significance than that which ap- 
 peared to John. Eijually symbolical is the opening 
 of the seals and the horses of various colors of chap- 
 ter six. And so the visions of symbolic beings and 
 doings succeed each other to the end. The angels 
 holding the four winds, the sealing of the servants of 
 
UKVKLATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 75 
 
 (i(m1 oil tlu'ir forelicmla, tho an<(«'l with th« ronsor, tho 
 Hcvt'ii jui^'cls with their trinn|H'tH, tho HoiiiKliii;^ ol' tho 
 tnuniK'tM, and wliat follows, aro all in tho lan;;ua^o ol" 
 ti'Miro. Thoti tlio woman and tho dra;;on and tho 
 hoaHts which Follow him, and tlio .stru;;;;loH, tho vials, 
 tho womiin in scarlot, IJahylon, tho whito horso and 
 Ids ridt'i- followoil by tho arnuos of hoavon on whito 
 Ijorsos, tho sliarp sword procoodinj^ out of Ids mouth, 
 tho Hunnnoninj; of tho vultures, otc, are all tl;jurativo 
 and symbolical. .John did not hoo, for tho most part, at 
 least, a vision of tho very thin<^s widoh wi^re to come 
 to pass, hut visions of wliat roprosontod thom in 
 synd)<)l and Hj^urt;. Thus wo coino to tho innnodiato 
 connection of our passage, and still, up to tho very 
 passaj^o itself, wo tind tho lan^uafre of symbol con- 
 tinued. No one surely can suppose that tho an<^ol 
 with Ids key and Ins cliain, ins bindin<^' Satan with 
 the chain, Ids castinj^ him into an abyss and locking; 
 him in and sealing; tlio abyss over, is a literal repre- 
 sentation. Even in tlu^ passa<^e itself there is nnich 
 that is undoiuably symbolical. The boast and his 
 ima<^o, and tlie receivinjj of the mark on their fore- 
 lioads and in their hands, are of tins ciiaracter. 
 Instead, tlierotbre, of its being unjustifiable to inter- 
 pret tliis passage figuratively, even if it is at all 
 possible to explain it literally, the overwhelming pre- 
 sumption from the whole character of the book from 
 tlie third chapter, and from the character of its 
 inmiediate connection and much of tho passage itself, 
 is in favor of a figurative explanation. It is more 
 
7G 
 
 A STl'DY IN K.S(:ilATOl.()(JV. 
 
 i 
 
 rcaHonaMo to infcorprot it fi^unitivcly, uii1«'hh its lan- 
 ;^ua;^(^ iiiakcH tliis t'X|>laiiati«)n woll-ni^li im|»<).ssil)lo. 
 
 2. Tho Hrcoinl (Icath, IVoin which thoHc who havo 
 part ill the tirst ivsur taction are .secun', is figurative. 
 Jh it not roasoual)lu that the first roHurrccti**!! in iiii- 
 incdiato couiioction with wliich it Mtaiuis .shoiiM also 
 ijc fi;^urativo / Pre-inillcimialiMtH aHHinnc (hat tho 
 Hucond rcHiirroctioii — tliat of* tiu' rest of the dead— of 
 wliich that of Rt^v. 20: 4-() is said to be the first, iH 
 descrihed in Rev. 20: II »([. As the latter is admit- 
 ted by all to be a physical rt^surn^etion, they ar;^ue 
 very strongly that the first resurrection which this 
 succetids must be of the same kind, and likewise of 
 the botlioH of those raised. Now, if the physical 
 resuirection of Rev. 20 : 1 1 wy,, were corndated with 
 that of Rev. 20 : 4-G as tlu^ second, of which this latter 
 is the first, their ar<;uinent a<^ainst the first bein<^ a 
 fit^urative resurrection would be very stron;,^ Hut in 
 assuming that the resurrection of R<'V. 20 : 1 1 i<<j., is 
 that of the rest of the dead spoken of in Rev. 20 : 5, 
 or the second resurrection of which that of Rev. 20 : 5 
 is the first, they jussume the very point to be proved, 
 and attribute to Post-niillennialists a view that most 
 of them repudiate, and that is forbidflen, as it seems 
 to me, by the passage itself. It is nowhere said that 
 Rev. 20 : 1 1 .57., describes the second resurrection, or 
 that of the rest of the dead. What are really corre- 
 lated in this passage are " the first resurrection " and 
 "the second death." Are we not almost as fully jus- 
 tified in assuming that both these must be of the same 
 character, as we should be that the resurrections of 
 
i{Kvi:i,ATH»\ 20 : 4-0. 
 
 77 
 
 V. 4 uihI v. 12 w/.. tnUMt. ho !»»', if tlu»y wen* r«'ljit«Ml in 
 tlir Niuiic wiiy :* It is the Prc-iiiiliriiniMlistM hii<I not 
 the Post-millctiiiiHlistH who would iiiuki' tlir n'Hiirn'o- 
 tioii of oik; kind an<l tlit* <l<'utli of >inotli«>r, tli«> lorinor 
 littTtil aiKJ tlM> latter Hpiiitual. So i'rc-iiiillciiiiialistH 
 arr njoro ;;iiilty of th«; iiicoiiMiHti'Mcy thry cliar^o 
 upon us than an; PoHt-niill(>nnialistH, who hold that 
 thr Hrst and second resurrections spoken of and im- 
 plied in Rev. 20: 4-0 are hoth H;^airative. 
 
 .S. The " rest of the <h'ad," it is <leclare(l, "lived not 
 until the thousand years sliould he tinished," Can wc 
 douht that this means they were to live when the 
 thousand years were ended i In v. M wc read that 
 the an^«'I shut Satan in tlic ahyss "that he should 
 
 • leceivc the nations no more until the thousand years 
 should he finished, " an ex[)ressi()n i<lentieal with v. '), 
 
 • pioted ahovc. Now, wc know that " until the thou- 
 sand years should he finished " of v. M did not mean 
 that Satan was not to «;o forth to ficeeive the nations 
 until a somewhat prolonged period after the thousand 
 years were over; but that he was to he^in his 
 evil work as soon as they were end d (v. 7). What 
 ri;^ht have we to suppose the very same words in 
 V. .") mean that the rest of the dead were not to live 
 nj^ain until the conclusion of a fateful period after the 
 thousatid years were completed ? And yet this is 
 what the literal interpretation of Rev. 20 : 4-C 
 recjuires us to believe. The rest of the dead, 
 the unrighteous, according to this view, instead of 
 livin*,' a<(ain at the end of the thousand years, do not 
 rise from the dead until after the last uprising of 
 
78 
 
 A STI'DY IN KSCMATOl.OdY. 
 
 wicki'iliirHs liuH run its conrMr. uftiT tin* cnijcIiiHion of 
 tlio iiiillcniiiiitii ( VN. 7-10), iiiid in tli(> I'cMurrcction of 
 
 V. I 1 nij. 
 
 Ami y»'t l'n»-inill«'niiiMli.stH an* proprrly very nnicTi 
 roiHTincd to iiiNi.st upon tlu' iiii|ili('ution of tliis vvonl 
 "until." Kor instuncr, Lukr 2! : 24, ".IrruNjiInu 
 nIihII lie tro*l(|t>n down of tlir (icntilcs until (lirtinirN 
 of tlio (ii^ntilt'N nIihII I>u fullillcd," i.s not tli()U;;lit to 
 int'im tliiit .IciusalriM \h to nnwiin trodden down until 
 lon^ jift«u' " tln' tinu'H of tin* (ientilt's he fultilled"; 
 |{oin. I I : 2.'), " Ilnrdeninj^ in ])art liath hefallcn Israel 
 until the fulne.sH of the (Jentiles be conio in," i.s not 
 interpreted to mean that this hardenin^^r Hhall continue 
 until a len^dhened period has elapsed after " the ful- 
 ness of the (jentiles he eonie in " ; Acts *i . 21, " Whom 
 the h«'av(!n must rec»'ive until the times of restoration 
 of all thin<^s," is not thouj^ht to iniply that our Lonl 
 is not to come until lon^ after the times of restora- 
 tion have ended. And ho we mi^^ht continue to refer 
 to the use ')f " until." )»ut tlie.se pas.sa<;es should sufliee. 
 
 It seems })lain,then, that Rev. 20: f) means that the 
 rest of the dead will live a^ain as soon as the thou- 
 sand years are finished, and not remain uiKjuickened 
 until after the ^reat uprisin<( of wickedne.ss shall 
 luive intervened. The ])re-millennial interpretation, 
 therefore, which sees the resurrection of "the rest of 
 the dead" in the vision of vs. 11-15, after the upris- 
 ing of evil shall have been crushed, rather than when 
 " the thousaiul years are finished," must be wronj^, 
 and we are shut in to another interpretation than the 
 literal, and one which does not contradict the plainest 
 
IlKVKI.ATlnN 20 : 4-(J. 
 
 70 
 
 iiiiptinitinn of tin* |him.sii;^«'. Tlir iTMUrrrrf ion of " tlj«' 
 roHt of tlu! (Iciul " iiiiiMi tiiku |tluc«> at tlii> v\\i\ of tlio 
 tlioiiMjiu<l yt'jU'H, ami not ul'tcr tlir luMt st ru;^';;lt! of t'vil 
 which huc('«'»'(1m this |H»ri«i«l. 
 
 Ih th(>r<> ill! iiitt'i'prctutioii, thru, of this dinictilt 
 piissji;;)', whirh \h h'SM ohvioiis to thr ol)'n'ctionM which 
 lie ii;;aiiiNt the litn-ai i'\|ilHiiiitioii. uiid which will 
 U'ttcr iiuM't the poNitivc comlitions which have Ih'cii 
 named, whil(^ at tlic Hanic tiino, it do(>H not coiillict 
 with the dinu't and ;(encral teachin;; of the New 
 Testainent i* We hol<l that there iH such an inter- 
 pretation, iilthon;;h no e.\e«^esiM of the passafjti may he 
 aito^^ether satisfactory. 
 
 Ah already noticed, Kev. '20: 4-0 is to bo interpre- 
 ted in conriection with Rev. G: 9-11. In tl>e earlier 
 chapter there is n vision of the souls of u cla.SH of 
 martyrs, unch'r the altar, cryinj^ out for a jud;^nient 
 and ven^^i'nnce upon their persecutors, whicli they are 
 told cainiot yet Im) ox<!Cuted. 'I'he vital (piestion in 
 the interpretation of both these related passa^CH is 
 whether this is a vision of tlie actual, or whetlier it 
 is a viHion of what represented the actual in a syni- 
 l)oIic way. It must be remendxM-eil that the altar, 
 and the martyrs, and their crying for satisfaction, are 
 a part of .loiui's (general vision reconled in chapters 4, 
 5, and 0, of the throne and one sitting upon it, of the 
 four and twenty elders, of the lamps Imrninjr before 
 the throne, of the glassy sea, of tlie four living crea- 
 tures full of eyes, etc. Now, no one believes this all 
 a vision of what was actually existinjij and taking 
 place in heaven. The lamps, the elder.s, tlie living 
 
80 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOOY. 
 
 yi 
 
 crentnroH aro all Hymholical mu\ roprescnt Homothing. 
 So hIho of tlic altiir and tlio inartyrH. Can wo believe 
 that John saw the souls of the martyrs except in 
 vision f ('an we believe that the souls of these most 
 faithful witnesses for (io«l are cast down at tlu; foot 
 of an altar, like the beasts slain in sacrifice f Can we 
 believe this to be their condition in heaven, and that 
 they must remain thus, consumed with unsatisfied 
 desire, until the last witness has sealed his testimony 
 with his blood ? No, it is doubtful if any sober 
 student of the Bible, be his view as to the nullennium 
 what it may, has ever thou<^ht this to be a vision of 
 the actual. The altar, the souls of the martyrs, their 
 place under or at the foot of the altar, their crying 
 with a great voice for satisfaction upon their perse- 
 cutors which would not be granted — all are to repre- 
 sent sonjething in the language of symbol. What can 
 the martyrs represent but the cause and principles 
 for which they suffered, and the spirit which animated 
 them in their heroic struggles ? Their position at the 
 foot of the altar of sacrifice shows forth the depressed 
 condition of the cause, principles and spirit they 
 represent. They are like the animals slain in sacri- 
 fice, and cast down beside the altar. To the same 
 effect is the significance of the cry for judgment and 
 vengeance, and the delay in the answer. The cause 
 and principles represented by the martyrs are crushed 
 under the opposing power of evil. Complete satis- 
 faction for the martyr blood shed is still future, 
 because evil still is strong. This condition must con- 
 tinue "until their servants also and their brethren, 
 
HEVKF.ATION ZO : 4-G. 
 
 81 
 
 wliiclj should l)e killod even as they wore, should bo 
 fullillod." 
 
 In Kov. 20: 4-6 that time has come, and in this vision 
 the rulHhnent of the promise is represented in similar 
 iiiiu*,^ery. The class of martyrs seen in Rev. (5: 9-11 
 reappears, aeconi{)anied by those who had now been 
 " killed as they were." But now, instead of bein^ as 
 dead, at the foot of the altar of sacrifice, they live. 
 Instead of havintj to cry with a «^reat voice for judg- 
 ment and vengeance, they have judgment given to 
 tiiem, and they sit enthroned and reign with Christ. 
 
 This vision shows the consummation of the Ions: 
 struggle between good and evil, God and Satan, which 
 is traced in the symbolic representations between 
 Rev. 6 : 9-11 and Rev. 20 : I. The emissaries of Satan 
 — the beast and the false prophet — have gradually 
 been overcome. And now Satan liimself is said to be 
 bound, as the final issue of the long and desperate 
 conflict, and the martyrs hold dominion with Christ. 
 Now, if the martyrs represent the cause, principles 
 and spirit of the martyrs, as we seem compelled to 
 believe, unless we make both visions views of the 
 actual rather than symbolic representations of what 
 is real, then for the martyrs to live and sit enthroned 
 and have judgment given to them, and reign with 
 Christ, must nieen that this cause and spirit and 
 these principles, instead of continuing as though life- 
 less, through being overborne by the might of evil, 
 now live, through asserting themselves with superior 
 power. They judge and reign because these principles 
 are recognized as the law by which life is to be 
 
82 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY, 
 
 i h 
 
 ju(1<((h1, and they now rule in tlie life of the world. 
 Rev. 20: 1-6 gathers up into a single vision the results 
 of the progress of the cause of Christ an<l the princi- 
 ples and the most devoted spirit of the Gospel, through 
 a long process of conflict and gradual triumph, and 
 symbols it forth in the enthronement and reign of the 
 clasa of men who represent the highest life of the 
 Church. 
 
 Just as the martyrs are said to live in the resurrec- 
 tion to life and power of the principles and spirit of 
 which they are the highest representatives, so like- 
 wise the wicked are said to live in the resurrection 
 to life and povver of the principles which they repre- 
 sent. When it is said, therefore, that " the rest of 
 the dead lived not until the thousand years were 
 finished," or that the rest of the dead were to live 
 when the thousand years had expired, it means that 
 we are then to look for a resurrection to life and 
 power of the principles and spirit of evil men, which 
 had been practically dead during the millennial 
 period, just as the principles and spirit represented in 
 the highest way by the martyrs had been practically 
 lifeless at the time referred to in Rev. 6 : 9-11. And. 
 this is just what we do find. Just as Satan is repre- 
 sented as bound through the curbing of his power 
 during the thousand years, at the close he is said to 
 be loosed again, as his power again is manifested 
 through the lives of men (Rev. 20: 7-10). This is the 
 resurrection which is the second, of which that of 
 Rev. 20: 4-6 is the first. Both resurrections are of the 
 same kind and figurative, Both correspond to the 
 
REVELATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 Hccoiul death, whicli is also fif^urative. The two 
 chiHsoH of men whicli repre.seiit the oj)|)OHing spirit 
 aii<l pi'inei[)les and cause of ri«jliteouHneRH and wicked- 
 nesH, of Christ and Satan, are said to live in the life 
 and power of what they repn;sent. This is one of the 
 most common forms of expression in the Hible. The 
 prodif^al, when he abandoned the spirit of his home, 
 died ; when he was restored t(j a right mind again, he 
 rose from the dead (Luke 15: 32). When men are 
 delivered from the dominion of sin and become right- 
 eous, they are said to be alive from the dead (Rom. 
 6 : 13). When nations are delivered from bondage, 
 they are said to live again in their restored pros- 
 perity (Ezek. 37 : 12-14). In Rev. 11 the two wit- 
 nesses are said to be slain and rise again from the 
 dead, as the open testimony to the truth which they 
 represent is suppressed or proclaimed. Allowing for 
 the inevitable setting or drapery of all symbolic 
 descriptions, which must not be pressed for a signifi- 
 cance it was not intended to convey, this interpreta- 
 tion is not unsatisfactory ; at least, it is not beset 
 with the difficulties to which the literal explanation 
 is exposed. The martyrs are said to reign with 
 Christ but a thousand years, because it is only for 
 this period that the principles and spirit they repre- 
 sent have unbroken sway over men. The judgment 
 and the avenging of the blood of the martyrs, in 
 an wer to their cry (Rev. 6 : 9-11), is to be interpreted 
 in the light of Rev. 19 : 2, " For he hath judged the 
 great harlot, which did corrupt the earth with her 
 fornication, and he hq,th avenged the blood of his 
 
84 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOfJY. 
 
 servants at her hand," " the hlood of prophc^ts and 
 of saints, and of all that have been slain" (Rev. 
 1*S : 24), The judjjnient and vengeance here 8i)oken 
 of was realized in the overthrow of the cause and 
 system of wickedness which slew the martyrs and 
 which is hero represented by a liarlot, just as the 
 cause and principles of Christ's kin<j:dom are repre- 
 sented by the martyrs. The pre-millennial interpre- 
 tation would re(juire us to believe t'lat the prayer of 
 the martyrs for jud«^!nent and vengeance was not 
 answered until the resurrection of Rev. 20 : 1 1 sq. — 
 after the great uprising of wickedness. But the 
 answer was to be delayed only until their brother 
 martyrs had been killed. In Rev. 20: 4-6 weaee them 
 in company with these very martyrs that were after- 
 ward slain, showing that this is the time for the 
 promised answer, and not after a subsequent period 
 had run its course. 
 
 The judgment and vengeance asked for in Rev. 
 G: 9-11 are, therefore, to be looked for in the crushing 
 of the persecuting cause of wickedness, through the 
 triumph of the cause and principles of which the 
 martyrs were the most faithful exponents, as repre- 
 sented in Rev. 20 : 4-6. 
 
 We Lave not space to elaborate this interpretation 
 at greater length. The reader must judge whether, 
 on its merits, in view of the symbolic and figurative 
 character of all the visions of Revelation, it is not 
 preferable to the pre-millennial explanation. Are we 
 not, at least, more than justified in accepting it in its 
 general features, rather than wrest from their natural 
 
 It I '■ 
 
HEVEf.ATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 M 
 
 aiul evi(l«nit iiieaniiiji^ all tlie plain and (lircct passaj^es 
 to which we have referred the reader, bearing on the 
 ([ueHtions of a f^eneral roHurrection, a <^eneral jud<^- 
 nient, and life in the flesh and prol)ation after Christ 
 coniess a«ijain, as we must do, if we accept the alterna- 
 tive pre-niilleiHiial and literal interpretation of Rev. 
 20 : 4-() ? 
 
 While Rev, 20 : 4-G is the only direct passage 
 claimed by I're-niillennialists in favor of a distinct 
 resurrection of the riohteous and another of the 
 wicked with more than the millennium between, they 
 refer to allusions which it is held can only be inter- 
 preted in harmony with their view. The chief of 
 tliese is the expression, " resurrection from the dead," 
 €H yfupan'. Tlie class of passages containing this 
 expression, it is claimed, " r'jpresent the resurrection 
 of believers as eclectic and special,* . . . refer 
 to ... a separation and (piickening to life out 
 from among the dead." 
 
 Tliis argument at one time appeared to us to Ite 
 very strong. A study of all the passages in which 
 " resurrection from the dead " and " resurrection of 
 the dead " occur, has greatly reduced our estimate of 
 its f(jrce. 
 
 These are the facts : 
 
 1. The resurrection of our Lord, which is pre- 
 eminently a resurrection from the dead, is twice 
 spoken of as a resurrection of the dead. 
 
 Acts 2() : 23 : " How that the Christ must suffer, 
 
 " Ecce Venit," p. 220. 
 
80 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCIIAT<)I,()(JV 
 
 aiul how that ho tii'Ht, by the rcHurrcctioii of tho dojul, 
 shouM proclaim light Iioth tu the people and to the 
 (JeiitileH." 
 
 'i'his, of course, inoaii.s, "that lie tirst ' hy Win own 
 resinrcetioii as He was " Hrst b<jni from the dead" 
 (Cyol. 1 : liS) "shoidd proclaim lij^ht," etc., His own 
 resurrection being thus termed a resurrection of the 
 dead. 
 
 Rom. 1:4: " Who was declared to be the Son of 
 (jiod with power ... by the resurrection of the 
 dead." This declaration was made by His own 
 resurrection, which is again called a resurrection of 
 the dead. 
 
 It is also more than jn'obable that Acts 17 : JVi, 
 " Now when they heard of the resurrection of the 
 dead," refera specially to the resurrection of Christ, 
 spoken of in the preceding verse, thus making three 
 instances in which our Lord's resurrection is spcjken 
 of as a " resurrection of the dead." 
 
 2. In only two ca.ses is there mention made of a 
 resurrection from the dead, apart from references to 
 the resurrection of our Lord, of Lazarus, and Herod's 
 guilty fear that John the Baptist had arisen from his 
 grave. These are Luke 20:3') and Phil. 3 : 11. It 
 is to be remarked, also, that while the record of our 
 Lord's answer to the Sadducees in Luke 20 : 35 is, 
 " They that are accounted worthy to attain to that 
 world and the resurrection from the dead," etc., in 
 Matt. 22 : 31, referring, as it would appear, to the 
 same resurrection, it is said to be "of the dead." 
 
 I 
 
 'I I 
 
llEVELATION 20 : 4-6. 
 
 1^7 
 
 .S. of tlie iiitie tiiiioH in which tlie expresHion, "ivHur- 
 rcction of tlio <h'a(]," is uhccI of other tlinn that of 
 CliriHt (Matt. 22:31, Acts 2:^:0,24:21, 1 Cor. 15: 
 12, l.'i, 21, 42, Hcl). () : 2) it is cortaiiily used tliree 
 times (Acts 2:i: 6, 24: 21, I Cor. 15: 42)— most e.Ke- 
 <;«'teH wouhl say six times, reckonint; in 1 Cor. 15 : 12, 
 l.'{, 21 as well — where the apostle had only the resur- 
 rection of the rij^hteous in his tliought. 
 
 4. It is especially to be noticed that in 1 Cor., chap. 
 l.'». where, as is generally admitted, Paul has the 
 rii^hteous dead alone in mind, and in v. 42 where 
 their resurrection alone can be alluded to, this resur- 
 rection is always referred to as a resurrection of the 
 dead, and not once as a resurrection from the dead 
 (vs. 12, 13, 21, 42). 
 
 Now, if Paul thought the resurrection of the right- 
 eous to be a first resurrection to glory from among 
 the wicked dead, who were not to be raised for more 
 than a thousand years, and in a second resurrection 
 to shame and everlasting contempt, it would seetn as 
 tliough he must certainly liave indicated it in the 
 onl}'' chapter in which he treats at large of their 
 rising from the dead, by using the expression, " resur- 
 rection from the dead," especially in v. 42. The use 
 of the expression, " resurrection of the dead," in this 
 whole chapter, makes it pretty evident that he did 
 not have before him this conception of the resurrec- 
 tion of the righteous as from among the dead. 
 
 It is also difficult to believe that our Lord's resur- 
 rection should be referred to as a resurrection "of" as 
 
88 
 
 A STUDY IN ES( HATOI,n(JY. 
 
 ill 
 
 ■ 1 
 
 i ^ 
 
 well aH "from" the dead, if the latter oxpre.sHion is 
 iiitende*! to convey a meaning distinct from that of 
 the former. 
 
 Neither let it he forgot t<'n that the act of h«'in^ 
 raised or of risin^^, whi^ther it he of saint or sintier, 
 can he expressed in no other way than as h«'inj^ raised, 
 or as a rising, "from the death" In this case there 
 cannot possihly he any thought of eclectic resurrec- 
 tion of sonu^ from among others who nnnain in their 
 graves. The expressions are prohahly elliptical wliere- 
 in heing rai.sed or rising from the dead is use(l for 
 heing raised from the |)laee or state of the dead. 
 Now, if tliere can he nothing of the eclectic idea in 
 these verhal expressions, do we need import this 
 significance into the substantive form, "resurrection 
 from the dead"? May it not also be an elliptical 
 expression, meaning resurrection from the place or 
 state of the dead? In view of the interchangeable 
 way in which "from" and "of" the dead are found to 
 be used, and also of Paul's use of "resurrection of the 
 dead" in the cliapter, of all others, in which we should 
 expect the other form, were it intended to mean what 
 our pre-millennial brethren declare, are we justified 
 in freigliting it with ho large a signiileance (• It may 
 be added that the great majority of coirunentators 
 pass over the expression, "resurrection from thedv-ad," 
 as though this form "from the dead" had no special 
 significance. 
 
 Phil. 3:11, "If by any means I may attain unto 
 the resurrection from the dead," is not difficult of 
 
UEVKLATION 20 : 4-0. 
 
 89 
 
 oxplnrmtion in Imrniony with this view. Tlio npostlo 
 ))iul in niintl, when writiii;^, the i>l»'HH('(hu!Hs which 
 should conio to hcIiovtTH at tht*ir resurrection, an \h 
 made evi<lent hy the following' verH«'H, not neceNsarily 
 any idea of a Hpccial re.surrection of tho righteous in 
 ])()int of time liefore that of the wieke(l. Hi.s lont;- 
 in^ and Htrivin;^ were for the hleHHednesH of this 
 resurrection of the ri^diteous, wliich only he had in 
 thouj^ht, irrespective of the (juestion whether they 
 were raised with or hefon; the wicked. 
 
 Another ar;(Minent for a separates n^surrecticMi of the 
 ri^diteous is sonietinies urj^ed.on the ^(round that New 
 Testament writers ho freciuently refrr to the resurrec- 
 tion of saints (exclusively. 1 Cor., chap. 15, and 2 Cor. 
 4 : H« s(j., are especially instanced. It is ar<^ue(l that 
 Paul could scarccdy have failed to make any reference 
 to the resurrection of the wicked, if he had supposed 
 them to share in the same <;eneral resurrection with 
 the righteous. Hut this form of reas(min<^' is very 
 unsafe. We niit^ht just as well argue, when we read 
 that ('hrist died for His sheep, and no reference is 
 made to His death availing for all men, that He nuist 
 have died a second time for them. The exj)lanation 
 is that in the connection in which such passages stand, 
 the writer is treating of the righteous only, and natur- 
 ally refers to their resurrection alone. Pre-millen- 
 nialists themselves do not place much stress on this 
 argument, and many omit it akogether in their discus- 
 sions. We merely mention it. 
 
 This finishes the discussion of our subject as it 
 
!)0 
 
 A HTUDY IN ESCHATOI.OCJY. 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 1 
 
 I 
 
 1 
 
 ' 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 1 • 
 
 1 
 1 
 
 rehitiiH to two n'Murri'ction.s uml vvluit is involved in 
 tliis fuiHlHinc'iital pn'-niillrMiiiiil coiict'iitioii. \V<* luivu 
 Houglit to j(ive the uvi<l('iico for tho virw wc; liohl 
 can<li<lly, uiid with a (l(>Hii'u to avoid a stiaiiUMl and 
 oiic-Hided intorpn'tation, wliiic ciuh'avorin;; to ;;ivo 
 inturpretatiouH which will haniioniz*^ tht' teachiii^^H 
 of tl»e New Tostainent, rather than l)rin;; them into 
 contlict. We luive also Houj^ht fairly to meet tlie 
 ar^uinmtM ur;;ed in favor of the pnj-niilleiujial view. 
 The reader inunt Jud^e for hininelf of uur uuccesH. 
 
 Llj 
 
TIIK KIN(}I)OM. 
 
 01 
 
 CIIAI'TI'R VI. 
 
 TIIK KINGDOM. 
 
 Phe-mif,i,enniai,ists «lirtbr from PoHt-milleiuiialiHtH 
 ill tlieir conception of the kin^<l<)ni and rei*;n of 
 Ciirist. Tiicy hold tluit tho kin^«loni of Christ is not 
 yet establisheil, althoii»;h its principles have sway in 
 tlie souls of believers. It is to be set up at His second 
 coming. 1 1 is rule in that kingdom is to be personal 
 and visible, on the earth, and during the inillennimn, 
 at least. Durinjr this time He will not only rei<^n 
 throu^^h the nii^ht of love and spiritual motive in 
 men's hearts, but al.so throu«^h compidsion over those 
 who do not otherwise submit to Him. The chief sup- 
 port for this conception of the kingdom of our Lonl 
 they find in a literal interpretation of Old Testament 
 prophecy, special prominence being given to the 
 promise to David that his throne sliould continue for- 
 ever. 
 
 On tlie other hand, Post-millennialists believe that 
 our Lord set up His kingdom at His first coming, and 
 that He took His scat as ruler in this king«lom, when 
 He rose from the dead and all power was given into 
 His hands. He is now seated on David's throne, ruling 
 
%. 
 
 w 
 
 .% 
 
 J^. 
 
 ^r^ >-,o.. 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 k{0 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 
 IIM 
 
 132 
 
 u 
 
 U i 1.6 
 
 ^/ 
 
 Y 
 
 <? 
 
 /^ 
 
 A 
 
 e. 
 
 
 c). 
 
 
 /^ ^>^ 
 
 <?. 
 
 / 
 
 
 / 
 
 y 
 
 >^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 :i>' 
 
 iV 
 
 #> 
 
 :\ 
 
 V 
 
 ^9) 
 
 V 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
 O^ 
 
 "%^ 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
* 
 
 » ■ » 
 
 
 ' 
 
 » 
 
 • 
 
 
 ■ 
 
 1^ 
 
 
 
 - 
 
02 
 
 A STUDY IN KS("IIATOI/HiY. 
 
 !i' 
 
 in the kingdom of grace, which is His only king- 
 dom on earth. This is to continue until His second 
 coming with the resurrection of the dead and the 
 judgment, when the eternal kingdom of glory will 
 succeed in its growing fulness, and for all who have 
 become members of the kingdom of His grace. 
 Christ is never to reign visibly and in person on the 
 earth, in the kingdom of grace, even if He is thus to 
 reign in that of glory. His kingdom on the eai-th is 
 spiritual, and His rule through the millennium is to 
 continue to be what it is at present, one of itiner 
 motive exclusively. Old Testament prophecy urged 
 in favor of the pre-millennial view of the kingdom, 
 when interpreted as the New Testament writers 
 explain it, finds its fulfilment in the present dispen- 
 sation. 
 
 It will thus be seen that the pre-millerniial concep- 
 tion of the kingdom is almost identical with that of 
 the Jews. Accepting the same literal interpretation 
 of prophecies respecting it, it is scarcely possible to 
 reach any other conclusion. Dr. Nicholson says : 
 " Christ . . . should succeed to David's throne precisely 
 as a son succeeds his father ; that He should succeed 
 to it as being so identically David's throne, that He 
 would have as the inherited subjects of His kingdom 
 ' the house of Jacob,' or, as elsewhere expressed, Judah 
 and Israel — the self-same people whom David ruled; 
 that, therefore. He should be a visible king reigning 
 on earth."* This and similar sentiments are found in 
 
 '•Prophetic Studies," 1886, p. 144. 
 
TIIK KI\(iD<>M. 
 
 93 
 
 all pro-inillcnnial vvritin<(s. The JewR were not so 
 iiHich in error in their conee})tion ol' the nature ot* the 
 kiMmloin tli(^ Messiali was to estahlish. But this 
 kin<^«loni, instead of bein^ associatc^l with His first, 
 was to be set up at His second coinint^. Whether our 
 Lord and the apostles endorsed this Jewisli idea of 
 His ruk> will be considered later. At the outset we 
 must ;^ive attention to this question of the interpreta- 
 tion of Old Testament prophecy. It is, of course, too 
 lar^e a subject to deal with further than as it is 
 related to the (juestion in hand, or otherwise than 
 briefly. 
 
 Fre-millennialists urf^e the following argument in 
 favor of their interpretation. The prophecies con- 
 cerning the birth, life and death of our Lord have 
 had a literal fulfilment. Therefore, we must expect 
 a similar fulfilment of those which relate to His king- 
 dom and reign. 
 
 This argument seems to have force. Let us 
 examine it : 
 
 1. It is only presumptive ; for it does not necessarily 
 follow that prophecies about the birth, life and death 
 of our Lord and those concerning His kingdom and 
 I'ule should be fulfilled in the same way. 
 
 2. It is also to be noticed that the prophecies about 
 the birth, life and death of Christ are incapable of 
 any other than a literal fulfilment. How could He be 
 born of a virgin in Bethlehem, become a man, be a 
 man of sorrows and acquainted with grief, make His 
 grave with the wicked, etc., except in a literal way ? 
 If He Wivs to be g, req,l being, then He nmst have a 
 
94 
 
 A STri)Y IN ESCflATOLOOY. 
 
 ro.'il hirth into a real life, and the incidents ol' that 
 real life wouM all he ical, and prophecies of them 
 would have a literal fulfilment. It does not follow, 
 because prophecies which are of such a nature that 
 they are incapable of any other than a literal fulfil- 
 ment, are fulfilled literally, that those which are ca])a- 
 ble of another than a literal fulfilment, must be fulfilled 
 in the same way. This, as it seems to ua, completely 
 sets aside all presumption in favor of the literal inter- 
 pretation of prophecies of His kingdom and rule, as 
 claimed by Pre-millennialists. 
 
 3. The great (juestion is, whether our Lord has estab- 
 lished a spiritual kingdom — a rule over men's spirits, 
 which is called a kingdom. If this be admitted — and 
 who can deny it ? — then it is more reasonable to argue 
 that, as Christ was to be a real being, all the pro- 
 phecies about His life are to be fulfilled literally in 
 the real life He was to live ; but, as He was to estab- 
 lish a spiritual kingdom, in which He was to rule 
 spiritually after His death, that the prophecies about 
 His kingdom and rule refer to this kingdom and rule, 
 and are to be fulfilled spiritually. What right have 
 we to assume that these prophecies refer to another 
 than the kingdom and rule we know our Lord to have 
 established, so long as they are capable of being inter- 
 preted in harmony with this known kingdom ? Can 
 anyone be justified in giving an interpretation to these 
 prophecies which makes it impossible to refer them to 
 this known kingdom, and then declare there must be 
 another kingdom, of which we know nothing, in order 
 to make this unnecessary interpretation possible ? 
 
THE KINfJDOM. 
 
 95 
 
 4. I)ut an examination of the prophecies fchoniselves 
 shoNVH tliat they cainiot h(! interpreted Hterally, heeause 
 tliUH explained, tliey lead to inij)()SHible concliKsionH. 
 Anionj( others are the t'ollowin<^ : 
 
 (a) Tlie Jewish conunonvvealth, with its priesthood, 
 feasts, sacrifices and worship, will be restored, in con- 
 nection with the kin<^doni which our Lord is to set 
 up. Isaiah ()G : 20-24 is regartled as a description of 
 the period of the kingdom, and mention is liere made 
 of " the housi; of the Lord," ^o which " the children of 
 Israel bring their offerings in clean vessels." " Priests 
 and Levites " are to be chosen for service. "New 
 moons and Sabbaths " will be observed and " all flesh 
 shall come to worshii) " before the Lonl, in His temple 
 at Jerusaleiii, from week to week. " No alien, uncir- 
 cumcised in heart and uncircumcised in flesh " shall 
 enter Jehovah's sanctuary (Ezek. 44 : 9). The feast of 
 tabernacles will then be observed, etc. (Zech. 14: IG). 
 The sanctuary and the tabernacle are to be set up 
 again (Ezek. 37 : 20, 27). 
 
 {})) This Jewish commonwealth, with all its restored 
 Jewish ritual and worship, together with the Gentiles 
 who adopt Judaism, constitutes the visible kingdom 
 over wliich our Lord is visibly to rule (Ezek. 37 : 21- 
 28 ; comp. Zech. 14 : 10). The Israelites are to be gath- 
 ered as one people (v. 22) and dwell in the land " given 
 unto Jacob" (v. 25), and David — Christ on the throne 
 of David — shall be their king (vs. 24, 25). . 
 
 (c) This kingdom and worship is to continue for- 
 ever. " Judah and Jerusalem " shall abide forever 
 (Joel 3: 20). The rule of David's line— fulfilled in 
 Christ — and the priests, Levites and sacrifices shall 
 
 ! 
 
96 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCUATOLOGV. 
 
 ! 
 
 Id 
 
 ml 
 
 \\m 
 
 never cease (.Ter. .MM : 17, 18). '* My Hjinctujiry sliall he 
 in the iniclst of them for cvcnnore " ( Kzek. .S7 : 28). 
 Now, if the word " fonsver " lia.s liere a limited meaii- 
 in^:;, aa is prohahle, it at h'ast means till the end of the 
 age or period spoken of. If these proplKicies, there- 
 fore, are of the reij^n of our Lord durin*,' the millen- 
 nium, as our pre-millennial friends declai'e, then there 
 is to be a restored Judaism until the close of this 
 period, or as long as our Lord rules as King on the 
 earth. 
 
 If the word "forever" really means here without 
 end, as it sometimes does, as this king<lom is thought 
 to be on the earth and forever, the interpretation 
 which makes His rule personal and visible, makes it 
 personal and visible on earth forever. In addition to 
 the passages referred to above, read also Micah 4 : 7 
 and Dan. 7: 14. 
 
 (d) There is to be the rule of physical force, as the 
 enemies of our Lord are dashed in pieces (Ps. 2), and 
 the nation and the kingdom which will not serve 
 " Israel " " shall perish " and be " utterly wasted " 
 (Isa. 60:12). 
 
 (e) Those that submit and accept Judaism become 
 the servants or slaves of the Jews (Isa. 14:1, 2; 61 : 5; 
 60: 14; 49: 23, etc.). 
 
 That the passages referred to, and others which 
 might be quoted, do plainly teach what is claimed 
 above, when literally interpreted, is tacitly, if not 
 avowedly, admitted by different classes of Pre-millen- 
 nialists. All classes of them believe that these pro- 
 phecies teach the restoration of Israel to Canaan. But 
 is this more plainly taught than that, at their return, 
 
THE KINGDOM. 
 
 97 
 
 tliey hIuiII iviuHtituto tlicir whole rituul, and be reco^- 
 iii/ed JiH the people and kin<;doni of Chiist, into meni- 
 hersliip in wliich none can enter unless they adopt 
 Judaism '. 
 
 May we not recjuire them to carry their literal in- 
 terpretation throu»^h,and demand that they accept not 
 only the return of the Jews and our Lord's visible rule 
 over them and those who are joined to them, but also 
 the description of their religious institutions as well :* 
 
 But the majority of Pre-millennialists jj;o fur- 
 ther than this. They admit themselves bound by 
 their interpretation to the reinst.tution of the Jewish 
 sacrifices, rites and observances, after their restoration 
 t(3 their own land. They endeavor, however, to stop 
 short of the full extent to which the literal iniorpreta- 
 tion would seem to compel tliem to go. The Jews 
 are to be restored to their own land before they are 
 converted. They set up their old ritual, which con- 
 tinues until they believe in Christ, and then the Jew- 
 ish sacrifices, etc., are abandoned. But if anything is 
 plain this is just what these prophecies, literally inter- 
 preted, absolutely forbid. The glory of the kingdom 
 culminates in the restoration of Israel's ancient relig- 
 ious ritual and services. Isaiah's last vision is of offi- 
 ciating priests and Levites, of the people presenting 
 their offerings and thronging to Jerusalem to the Sab- 
 bath and the new moon observances. So, also, of 
 y'echariah. His closing vision of wdiat Pre-millen- 
 nialists assume to be the millennial era, is of the 
 renmant of the Gentile nations, as proselytes to 
 Judaism, going up yearly to Jerusalem to worship 
 
98 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOT.OOY. 
 
 r'4 
 
 tlio l<in^, the Lord of Ifosts, and to koop the frast ol' 
 tahcniHclcH ( 14 : l(j), oi' the; p«M)j)lr j)n'parin;^ tlnur sac- 
 ritlcoH ill vchhoIh holy to tlio Lonl, and to service ren- 
 derc<l to Him in His hoUHJs, into which no Canaanite 
 — uncircuniciHcd — is permitted to enter. In all the 
 prophetic descriptions there is no hint that the Jewish 
 ritual, wlien reinstituted, is to j^ive place to anytliin^ 
 else. It is an integral part of the f(lory of the kin^^doni 
 un«ler the rule of the Son of David, and is said ex- 
 pressly, as above, to continue forever. This can mean 
 nothing less, at least, than to the end of the millennial 
 age, to which it is said to belong. 
 
 So evident is this that niany of the most candid Pre- 
 niillennialists of the last generation were forced to tlie 
 conclusion that the rites and sacrifices of the Jewish 
 dispensation are to be observed in th(^ millennial period, 
 and they hazarded conjectui'es as to the purpose they 
 are to serve.* 
 
 The most of the pre-millennial writers of to-day 
 make no attempt to face these difficulties. 
 
 This is ecpially true of force succeeding the reign of 
 spiritual motive, in case of the unrighteous, when our 
 Lord is supposed to set up His kingdom. There is a 
 section of Pre-millennialists who are forced to believe, 
 from their literal interpretation of Old Testament 
 prophecy, that when Christ comes as king in His 
 kingdom, it will be to crush all opposers by His might. 
 
 * Rev. M. Fay, "The Second Advent," pp. 120,583-86; Rev. 
 W. R. Freemantle, "Lent. Lectures," pp. 276-79; Rev. M. Bocett, 
 "Israel's Sins and Israel's Hopes," pp. 271-73; Rev. W. Pryn, 
 " (}ood Things to Come," pp. 165-67 ; Rev. A. Bonar, "Coining and 
 Kingdom," p. 222 ; Rev. C. Molyneux, "Israel's Future," pp. 252- 
 58 ; see also Blackstone, "Jesus is Coming," p. 134. 
 
THE KINnnOM. 
 
 90 
 
 TIniH it Ih .seen that each of the eoiicIusioiiH wo 
 havr rd'ernMl to as nowHsary from thi^ Mtoial inter- 
 pretation of Old 'l\'Htainent prophecy, is admitted hy 
 different clasHes of rre-miUennialiNtH a pretty sure 
 evidence were any proof, additional to what is ho evi- 
 dent from the pasHatjes cited and from otlier.s which 
 iiiij^lit be mentioned, needed, that this interpretation 
 does K't^itimately lead to such eonchi.sions. 
 
 Can we believe tliat tlie progress of the nn;ea from 
 tlie material and .sensuons into the more sj)iritnal 
 sliall be revei*sed :* Is it j)ossible that (Jod will write 
 failure upon His work in estahlishinc^ Christianity by 
 abandoning it foi* .ludaism, with its priesthood and 
 siicriHees, its rites an<l symbols, its physical force and 
 its unsparin*^ ri^or :* Is the culmination of the re- 
 li<;ioua progress of the a<^es to be but a return to an 
 etiete and vanished system, adapted, as we had sup- 
 posed, to the race when it was ignorant and unspiri- 
 tual, and which, it was hoped, mankind had lon«( out- 
 «(rovvn ? We surely are not recpiired to acce])t a 
 system of interpretation which makes such demands, 
 unless there is no other which can save us fi-om con- 
 clusions so anomalous and incredible. But there is 
 more than the inherent improbability of all this a<j;ainst 
 it. If anything is made plain in the New Testament, 
 especially in the Epistle to the Hebrews, it is that the 
 sacrifices and priesthood, etc., of the Jewish dispensa- 
 tion were typical of Christ, His work and sacrificial 
 death, and had their fulfilment in Him, and were so 
 abolished forever. 
 
 If Paul also believed Old Testament prophecy 
 
 
 i I 'it 
 
 ¥ i 
 
 l\\ d 
 
 III 
 
100 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOI.CKIY. 
 
 tan^^lit iliut n ivstoriMl Ju<laisin, witli its circumciHion 
 iuid its ritual, was to constitute; tlu; final rcali/atiori 
 of ('liristianity, could ho havo vcnturrd to oppose ho 
 Htrcnuouslv ihvi .lu<lai/,iii;: tcncIuM'H of Ins own time i' 
 ('ould \u> liav(; wai'iicd tlic (Jaiatians that to accept 
 cii'cuiucision and wiiat it involved was to forfeit the 
 Ix'iietits of (Christ's re<leinption i' 
 
 It is also strnn^a; that Paul, witli all his yearnin;^ 
 over his own people and desin; to comfort them, nev(;r 
 told them that th(! time was comiiiir when .luduism 
 should he restore*!, and their nation, with their old 
 reli<^ion, should dominate the world un<ler the Mi^ssiah 
 — tlie Christ whom they were so lon;^ to n^ject. Ho 
 mi'^dit have a<lde(l : "Your ideas of the Messiah and 
 His kin^jdom, an 1 of the part your nation is to play 
 under Him, is according; to the teaehin<jf of the 
 proplu^ts. ( )nly you are wron(^ in supposinj^ this is 
 to occur in connection with His first cc^minir. In eon- 
 nection with His first coming, and for centuries after, 
 you nuist al)andon Judaism, in order to be His follow- 
 ers. But in connection with His second, wlien He 
 comes to set up His kin<j^dom, you nuist restore Juda- 
 ism, and all who would share in the full ^lory of His 
 reign must accept the ritual that for centuries He 
 demanded must be abandoned, before they could have 
 part with Him." We do not think this overdraws the 
 antaf»onism between the conclusions rendered neces- 
 sary by the literal interpretation of the prophecies of 
 the Old Testament and the teaching of the New. As 
 we discuss the (juestion of the kingdom more particu- 
 larly, we shall refer to one phase of this subject in 
 greater detail. 
 
1 
 
 IHK KI\(J|M».M. 
 
 101 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 CllAPTKK VII. 
 
 TMK K[N(;i>()M (Continnvil). 
 
 Let uh CJiret'ully exjimino tlu.' teacliin;,^ ol' tlie New 
 Testament on tlie (lUcHtions which divide I're-inillen- 
 niali.st.s and Post-inilleiniialiHts a.s to tlie kingdom. 
 Ih it taiij^lit that this kingdom will not be setup until 
 Christ's second coniin;^^ that it will he on earth and 
 territorial rather than, or even as well as, over men's 
 hearts, and that our Lord will reij^n in personal and 
 visible [)resence, when it is established !* 
 
 The first feature ol:' the teaching of the Gospels 
 which strikes us is, that it is represented as both 
 ]M*esent and approachino. From the time of John 
 "the {^(jspel of the kin<^dom of God is preached, and 
 every man entereth violently into it" (Luke IG : 10). 
 In the parables of Matt. 13, diti'erent features of a 
 present kini^dom are spoken of. It is never " the 
 kingdom of heaven shall be like," etc. The rich man 
 might have found entrance into the kingdom of 
 heaven, rather than turn away, ami suggest to our 
 Lord the statement that " it is hard for a rich man to 
 enter into" it (Matt. 19:10-2o). Whatever Matt. 
 16 : 19 may mean, it at least declares that the power 
 
102 
 
 A s'rrDY IN EsrnAT<)r,(MjY 
 
 W'U'V rocvAVi'A w»iH to Ih3 (^xorciHc*! l»y liiin in con- 
 nection with II pH'scnt kifi^doiii. 
 
 " \Vlu)H(M'vrr will liun»l)i«' liiiiiMcH' an<l Im^cotho as a 
 littio child is ;4n'jit('Ht" in tiiiit kin^^dom alicudy ; not 
 mIiuII l»e at Honic futnre day. 'I'he HcriltrH and Plmri- 
 sccH do not <'nt(^r into tho kin^^doni of hoavon, luiithcr 
 do thoy " HufltT thtnn that an; entt'rin;; in to enter" 
 (Matt. '2:\: Hi, etc.). 
 
 It i.s alHo Hpokon of aH " at hand"; .lohn the liap- 
 tist (Matt. M:2); our Lord hitMscil' (Matt. 4:17^; 
 Mis apoHtlcH (Matt. 10:7); and the seventy (Luke 
 10: 0, etc.). 
 
 Now, neither of tlie.se ropresentationH, it' tliey he 
 indeed different rej)r(!.sentationH, leaves room For the 
 iden, that this kin<(doni is still future. Many Pre- 
 niillennialists attempt to explain away this ditKculty 
 by sayin*^ that our l^ord came to set up His visible 
 kingdom and rei^n, expectin;( I lis aneicMit people to 
 receive Him; hut through tlieir rejection of Him, His 
 ])ur[)ose was defeated, and the kin^^^dom was deferred 
 until His second advent.* 
 
 It will he noticed, liowever, tliat our Lord did not 
 say, the kinj^dom of heaven is at hand, if the Jews 
 receive me. His declaration of its presence was 
 absolute. He couKl not, therefore, on tliis supposi- 
 tion, have foreknown that they would reject Him. 
 He must have misinterpreted Isa. 5.S and the other 
 prophecies of the rejection of the Messiah. Their re- 
 jection of Him mu.st have come to Him as a surprise, 
 
 * See e.tj., "Jesus is Coining," p. 3G ; "Prophetic Studies," p. 46. 
 
TUK KIN'ODOM. 
 
 loa 
 
 Hn<t th(! ilcliiy in Huttinf^ up His kin;^Ml()in hh an after- 
 iliou^^Mit. Iltul thoy i'ccuiv<Ml Mini, hIno, IIkmi lie 
 would hiivr ^'oiH^ to His throne juhI not to tlic croHH. 
 'I'lirn then) would Iwivr been no need tluit lie .should 
 die and iiiako atonenicnt, in ordur that (Jod hIiouM 
 lii;,dily exalt llini (Phil. 2: {), 10). It in stran^ro that 
 anyone .shouM attempt to huvv a theory at the cost of 
 HUeh conceptioiiH of the foreknowledge and innnuta- 
 hility of Chri.st, and the ah.soluto nece.sHity of His 
 atoning; work, as are thu.s involve<l. 
 
 It <l()eH not directly concern uh in thi.s discns-sion to 
 iiKpiire in vvhatsen.se the kin<^doin waH pre.sent «lurinj^ 
 our Lord's life and in what .sen.se Htill to come. Wo 
 helieve, however, tlu; distinction m to be found in 
 this; While the kingdom, a.s a spiritual rule in the 
 hearts of men, had be<;un, durin;^ our Lord's life, Jis 
 He taught its principles aiul f^ained followers, it was 
 not until He luul ccjmpleted His atonin*^ work and had 
 been j^ifted with "all authority in heaven and earth" 
 (Matt. 28: 18) to administer its government and 
 advance it among men, that it was formally 
 instituted. 
 
 In this connection let us call attention to another 
 point. Fre-milU nnialists hold that the coming of our 
 Lord, which was said to be near and innninent in so 
 many passages, was His second personal coming to set 
 up His kingdom. If this be so, is it not strange that, 
 while the writers of the epistles so fre(iuently speak 
 of the coming of the Lord as nigh, they never thus 
 speak of His kingdom, although they make frequent 
 reference to it ? Is it not difficult to believe that 
 
 in 
 
 il 
 
i' 
 
 104 
 
 A STUDY m ESCHATOLOfSY. 
 
 theso two events can be associated to^^etlier, when 
 one is so often said to be near, and the otlier is never 
 til us spoken of ? 
 
 The nature of tliis kingdom and rule is also very 
 clearly taught in the New Testament. It " is not 
 eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and 
 joy in the Holy Ghost" (Rom. 14: 17). It is not mate- 
 rial but spiritual. It " is not of this world " nofff-ioS 
 (John 18 : 36). Those who become members of it 
 must be born from above (John 3 : 3-5), must have a 
 real righteousness (Matt. 5 : 20). Position in it is 
 gained through meekness and humility (18 : 4). The 
 members of this kingdom have their citizenship in 
 heaven (Phil. 3 : 20). This kingdom is unseen, as it 
 exists in, or in the midst of men, so that it conieth not 
 with observation (Luke 17 : 21). It is the antipodes 
 of the power of darkness, and the Colossian believers 
 had all been already translated into it, when they had 
 been delivered from this awful power (Col. 1 : 13). 
 
 These and other passages make it plain that our 
 Lord's rule in this kingdom is not territorial, but 
 over men's hearts, as they are conformed to His image 
 through the new birth, and thus gladly acknowledge 
 His sway. It is enlarged, not by taking in new 
 lands, but new hearts. It is pushed forward, not by 
 omnipotent might, but by omnipotent love. Subjec- 
 tion is not formal and of the outward life, but real, 
 of the spirit as well. In this kingdom He is ruling 
 now. He does not need to come in person and use 
 His omnipotent might in order to exercise this sway. 
 This kingdom and rule continue to enlarge as the 
 
 Jf 
 
THE KINUUOM. 
 
 105 
 
 Gospel of the kin<if(loin (Luke 9:2; comp. v. 0), or tlie 
 word of the kin<^(loin (Matt. 13 : 19) is proclaimed. 
 
 This conception of the kin<^(loin helps us to under- 
 stand another of its aspects which is still future. 
 This kingdom of grace on earth issues in the eternal 
 kingdom of glory in heaven. Therefore it is that 
 Paul declares " The Lord will save me unto his 
 heavenly kingdom" (2 Tim. 4: 18). It is also to be 
 n(jticed that in the first verse of this chapter, he 
 charges Timothy, by the Lord's " appearing and his 
 kingdom " to preach the Word. Can we doubt that 
 the kingdom which He associates with the Lord's 
 second coming is the heavenly kingdom He speaks of 
 in V. 18, rather than a millein)ial kingdom on earth, 
 as Pre-millennialists believe ? Peter also (? Pet. 
 1 : 11) speaks of "entrance into the eternal king lorn 
 of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ," referring to 
 the everlasting kingdom of glory. The reward to those 
 who have been persecuted for righteousness' sake is 
 to become sharers in the kingdom of heaven with its 
 great reward in heaven (Matt. 5 : 10-12), and those 
 who belong to it are commanded to lay up for them- 
 selves treasures in heaven, for it is only there that 
 they can be safe (Matt. 6:19). To the rich young 
 man who asked, " What shall I do to inherit eternal 
 life" (John 10: 17), our Lord gave instructions how 
 he might have "treasures in heaven" (v. 21), and 
 when he refused to comply with them, Jesus said 
 " How hardly shall they that have riches enter into 
 the kingdom of God " (v. 28), showing that the great 
 blessedness of entrance into the kingdom of God was 
 
lOG 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOI/KJV. 
 
 ! 
 
 i ilij 
 
 ' * 
 
 
 
 '■ , ] 
 
 ' ■} 
 
 i 1 
 1 1 
 
 
 ll 
 
 Ur: 
 
 in socurin<r treasures in heaven. After telling his 
 disciples that it was the Father's good pleasure to 
 give them the kingdom (Luke 12 : 32), instead of refer- 
 ring them to a reign in this kingdom on earth as their 
 great reward, he urges them to secure treasure in 
 heaven and to have their hearts there (vs. 33, 34), and 
 not be filled with the thought of any future glory on 
 the earth. " Many shall come from the east, etc., and 
 shall sit down with Abraham, etc., in the kingdom of 
 lieaven : but the sons of the kingdom shall be cast 
 into the outer darkness : there shall be weeping and 
 gnashing of teeth" (Matt. 8:11, 12). This is not the 
 description of the sitting down, etc., in the millennial 
 kingdom of our pre-millennial brethren ; for they 
 believe that at the beginning, or before it is set up, 
 the sons of the kingdom, or the Jews, shall be 
 gathered into it, and shall have first place, next to 
 the king. It is a description of the kingdom in 
 heaven and not on earth, as the outer darkness and 
 the weeping and gnashing of teeth (references to the 
 lost in Hades) of those who are cast out abundantly 
 show. It is this kingdom of God in heaven which 
 " flesh and blood cannot inherit " (1 Cor. 15 : 50). The 
 kingdom here spoken of is the one which believers 
 inherit after the resurrection, as the connection of 
 this verse shows. Now, the earthly millennial 
 kingdom, according to pre-millennial conception, 
 is one in which a great host of saints in the 
 flesh shall have a share. In this place, where above 
 all others, perhaps, we might expect the reference to 
 be to this earthly kingdom, were there to be such 
 
THE KINGDOM. 
 
 107 
 
 a oijc, it Is (](3riiiitely and (lociHivoly excluded — a 
 pretty sure indication tliat Paul ha<l no knowledge 
 of it. 
 
 Are we not then — in view of all these passages and 
 of others which might he adduced — compelled to 
 helieve that the aspect of the kingdom of hi'aven 
 under which it is spokiui of as future, is the kingdom 
 as it is in the heavenly glory, where there shall be 
 the realization of its aims and blessedness in ever- 
 growing fulness ? In all the passages (juoted. and 
 they constitute nearly all the allusions to the king- 
 dom in the New Testament, there is no reference to a 
 future territorial and material reign of our Lord on 
 earth ; in the most of them, this idea is absolutely 
 ruled out. 
 
 The expression "shall" or "shall not inherit the 
 kingdom of God," if it refers to the kingdom at all 
 as future, must mean become sharers in the kingdom 
 of glory. " Thy kingdom come " in the Lord's prayer 
 must be joined with "Thy will be done, as in heaven, 
 so on earth," or it may mean, come in the complete 
 realization of its purpose, in bringing all men into 
 loving subjection to Christ. We do not need to intro- 
 duce any visible reign of Christ in an earthly king- 
 dom to explain this passage. The kingdom of God, 
 into which Paul said the Ephesians must enter 
 through much tribulation (Acts 14 : 22), and of which 
 the Thessalonians sought to be worthy through suffer- 
 ing (2 Thess. I : 4, 5), does not need to be a visible king- 
 dom on earth, but the grander kingdom of glory, with 
 its rewards in heaven. " If we endure, we shall also 
 
 in 
 liii 
 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
108 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOI-OUY. 
 
 rei<^n witli him" (2 Tim. 2:12) does not require 
 UH to think it a rei<^n on eartli, Imt in the eternal 
 ^lory spoken of in v. 10. Is it not the absurdity 
 of literalism to infer from Luke 22:29, 80, "I 
 appoint unto you a kinj^dom, even as my Father 
 appointed unto me, that ye may eat and drink at 
 my table in my kingdom," that tliis is to be a 
 material kinpjdom, rather than considei' the form of 
 expression, "eat and drink," etc., as determined by 
 the circumstances which sugj^ested this whole pas- 
 sage ? In any case, Pre-millennialists believe this 
 kingdom will not be enjoyed by the apostles until 
 after their resurrection, and if they are then to 
 eat and drink, why not in heaven as well as on 
 earth, and, ir at all, why not forever ? This is 
 considered by Blackstone " the strongest proof that 
 the kingdom will be literal and material." As well 
 might we believe that Rev. 3 : 20, " Behold I stand at 
 the door and knock : if any man hear my voice and 
 open the door I will come in to liim, and will sup with 
 him and he with me," is to be taken literally. Both 
 passages refer to the condescending and intiniatf! 
 fellowship our Lord is to hold with His people. Matt. 
 26 : 29 may well be interpreted in a similar way. The 
 passage which was oner urged most strongly for the 
 doctrine of a material kingdom is Rev. 5 : 10. But 
 it was without manuscript authority, as in the 
 old version, and the revised version gives it, " They 
 reign on the earth," not " They shall reign." As this 
 vision is of the redeemed prior to the millennium, the 
 reign, as already exercised, cannot be of a visible and 
 
THE KINGDOM. 
 
 109 
 
 iiiatt'iial kiiul, our pre-inillijiiiiial fri(in(lH tlieniHelvos 
 
 " Know yo not that tlio Haints sliall Jiid^c tlic world V 
 (I Cor. i) : 2) is ur;4»'<l in favor of a literal and niat«3rial 
 kin^^doni here on earth lint this is followed by 
 "Know ye not that W(^ shall jud«^e r.n<(('lsj'" in v. 
 .S. Now; if V. 2 proves that the sain are to share in 
 tlie literal jud«(ni(Uit of the world, meaning the wicked 
 of the world, then v. 8 nuist mean that there is really 
 to he a literal jud<^uient of holy an<^els, in which the 
 saints are likewise to share. It is safe to say that a 
 future judgment of an<^els in this literal sense is 
 foH'i^n to the teaehin«!j of the New Testament. It 
 wouM he very unsafe to base so large an inference 
 upon this one obscure passaoe. If it does not refer 
 to jud^nnent in this literal personal sense, in the one 
 case, it does not in the other. May it not mean that 
 the saints may judge the world and angels in the 
 sense that the standard of their life and thouirht is 
 that by which the world shall be condemned and the 
 angels justified :* In any case, the saints might have a 
 part with Christ in judging the wicked, and still there 
 be no personal reign of Christ on the earth. In the 
 passage "judge" can scarcely mean " I'ule," for in this 
 sense it could hardly be thought to be over angels. The 
 a])ostles sitting on twelve thrones, judging the twelve 
 tribes of Israel (Matt. 19 : 28), is a passage of acknow- 
 ledged difficulty. The judging is restricted to the 
 twelve and is not a general function of all the re- 
 deemed. Every one who has denied himself for 
 Christ's sake (v. 29) "shall receive an hundredfold"; 
 
 ;,,'[' 
 
 Hi] 
 
no 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOT,OOY. 
 
 
 but tlio apo.stlcH only arc to ju(l;(^^ It is a Hpocial 
 function cxiirciHcd ovor Lsmcl, aii'l it will 1)0 ovor 
 l)oIievin<i^ Israel, aH most I're-iMillcnniali.sts suppose; 
 for th(;y hol<i tliat Israel is to bo converted before the 
 second advent, or, at h^ast, in eonneetion with it. 
 Whatever it may mean, therefore, it constitutes slight 
 cvid(uice for a j' rsonal rei<(n of our Lord and His 
 people on the earth. We have; already ^iven extended 
 notio'j ,0 Rev. 20 : 4-0. It may be ad<led, in this con- 
 nectioi ^at nothin*^ is said in thai, passaj^e about a 
 1 ''^n on the earth; it is "reign with Christ," that is 
 all. If the interpretation we have «;iven of this pas- 
 sa<(e be alon<5 the ri<j;ht line, then it has no reference 
 to a personal rei^^n. In Matt. 21 : 43, "The kin<;dom 
 of Orod shall be taken away from you, and shall be 
 given to « nation bringing forth the fruits thereof," 
 the meaning doubtless is that the special otter of its 
 blessings to the Jews as the ancient people of God, 
 shall be withdrawn, and its blessings be opened to the 
 Gentiles, who would be prepared to bring forth its 
 fruits. This began to be fulHUed when Paul at Anti- 
 och turned to the Gentiles (Acts 13:46), and when 
 at Rome, after " testifying the kingdom of God " to 
 the Jews (Acts 28 : 28) and their rejection of his mes- 
 sage, he declared, " Be it known therefore unto you, 
 that this salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles: 
 they will also hear " (v. 28). It is significant that 
 the kingdom of the Pre-millennialists is one in which 
 the Jews are to have the first place. 
 
 We have now referred to about all the passages in 
 the New Testament, pertinent to the question under 
 
THE KINODOM. 
 
 Ill 
 
 iliHCiiHsioii. That tlic Uin^jdom of licavi'ii \h Hpiritnal, 
 a roiirn in nu'ii's liearts, aiwl not iiwit«'rial, over eartli 
 as ft territory — that this kin^^dom and n-i^n l)(>;;an 
 when our Lord was on eartli, was rnoro formally os- 
 ta])liHh('d at His ascenHion to tlio ri;^l»t hand ol* power, 
 and that our [jord is now excrcisinj; His rule, seem 
 altunihuitly manit'cst. 11' th.is is made clear, we must 
 not assume that the principU's and metliods of tins 
 kinirdom are to be revolutionized at some future tinie, 
 and a rule of force as well as of t^race in a material 
 kingdom begun, unless upon the clearest (evidence. 
 Still less should we be disposed to do this, if we boar 
 ill mind that God's kinirdom on earth was once of this 
 character, and that it has issued forth from the more 
 material into the spiritual. A conception of it which 
 re(|uires us to believe it will revert back to the more 
 material, is too much like progress ending in retrogres- 
 sion, at least in some of its features, to be acce|)table. 
 The support, also, which Pre-millennialists claim for 
 this belief from the New Testament is in allusions 
 which are scant and not without obscurity. It is doing 
 them no wrong to state that their chief reliance, to 
 make good their claim that our Lord is to reign per- 
 sonally on the earth, is upon Old Testament prophecy, 
 in connection with their belief in the restoration of 
 the Jews to their own land. We proceed to consider 
 the prophetic teaching upon which they depend. 
 
 !5I! . 
 
112 
 
 A STirDY IN KSfHAT()t,()(»V. 
 
 CHAPTKR VIII. 
 
 m 
 
 TIIK KINCJnoM {CnndmM). 
 
 Pke-.MFLF.EMNIAMsts hold tliiit the throno of J)»ivi(I, 
 spoUon of in ( )l(l 'reHtainont prophecy, is distinc- 
 tively our Loril's throne. They chiini tliat He is now 
 sittin<r on His Father's tlirone, at His ri^dit hand, and 
 has not yet assumed rule in His own kin;^d()in. It is 
 only at His second coniin;^ tiiat He steeps down from 
 this tlirone to take tluit of His earthly father David, 
 and rule in His proper kin<^doni. 
 
 It is a rei<^n of our Lord in person, from His throne 
 in Jerusalem, over a subject world.* 
 
 Bishop Nicholson, in the address from whicli I have 
 already (pioted, puts the view very elo(|uently : "In 
 the Davidic sonship He takes the kingdom that has 
 descended to Him, the earthly throne that He has in- 
 herited, reigning therefrom in all essential attributes 
 of our manhood, yet robed in the majesty of His God- 
 
 *Iii discussion, prominent Pre-millennialists sometimes deny that 
 their view of tiie millennial kingdom involves the personal and con- 
 tinued presence of Christ on earth, or the presence here of saints in 
 resurrection bodies. But how can Christ reif^fn personally, and how 
 can saints share in the blessings of this earthly kingdom, unless they 
 are present in person on the earth ? The anomalies involved in the 
 pre-millennial ccmception of the millennial kingdom cannot be 
 avoided by any denials of this sort. 
 
TIIK KINGDOM. 
 
 ua 
 
 
 h( otl. Tims His Duvi'lic lufirsliip will Iwivo Ihmmj iiiado 
 jivaiJjiMr iiy reason of His u('C'oiii)>lislu><l utonrniciit, 
 jirnl us >i piit'st as well as ji kin^, llr will sit on the 
 throne oF Ilis;^lory. A theocracy, then, the kin<^<ioin 
 of the Christ will be, a divinc-hnman monarchy, 
 wlu.'rein, as well as the Savionr ami the snprenu' 
 ohject of worship, the world's supreme civil ruler He 
 will lie Men shall see the kin^ in His heauty, evan- 
 «;elist divine, society's re<j;enerator, creation's master, 
 • dorious in holiness <loin<j wonders.' * 
 
 As we have already remarked, this interpretation 
 of prophecies referrin*^ to the exaltation and reij^n of 
 our Lord, as well as those describin«( the future exal- 
 tation of Israel, is identical with that of the Jews 
 themselves. Let us see whether this interpretation 
 can be adopted and not Icjad to impossible conclusions 
 — conclusions which not only have no support in the 
 New Testament, but which are in contradiction to its 
 teachint^. 
 
 In order to fi^et a clear view of the (question, we 
 must ^o back to the covenant promises made to Abra- 
 ham and David, and strive to learn whether their 
 assurances, taken in a literal way all through, have 
 been or can be fultilled. 
 
 Let us turn first to Gen. 17:7,8: "And I will 
 establish my covenant between me and thee, and thy 
 seed after thee throughout their generations, for 
 an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee and to 
 thy seed after thee. And I will give unto thee and 
 
 ''if , 
 
 8 
 
 "Prophetic studies," p. 143. 
 
1U 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCTIATOT.OOY. 
 
 m 
 
 to thy H«'('(l after ihw, tlu' lami of tliy Hojoiinnii^H, all 
 the liuid of (yanaati, for an evoriaHtiii;; posHOMMion." In 
 the n^nuwal of the covenant ((Jen. 22: \H) there iH 
 added, "and in tliy Heed Hhall all tlio nationH of the 
 earth he hleHHed." 
 
 TluH covenant waH renewed to Isaac (Oon. 2() : .*J-5), 
 an<l to Jacob ((ien. 'Vt : 12). Do thcHe pronn'seH that 
 the (leHcendants of Abraham .shall |)oh.s(^h.s the land of 
 Canaan thron^hout their j^eneration foi* an everhiHt- 
 inp poHHCssion, asHiire that Israel shall afjain, as a 
 nation, rule Palestine i If Dr. West's statement, in 
 "IVophetie Studies," p. 12(1, is correct, an< I "(jlod's cov- 
 enant with Abraham is all of grace, and therefore 
 .unconditional," if it is taken literally, its promises 
 have been broken. For nearly two thousand years 
 the Israelites have not possessed the land of Canmin 
 "in their generations." They have not continued to 
 hold it as an "everlasting" possession, even in any 
 restricted sense in which this word may be used. 
 These promises, therefore, which give no pledga of 
 continued possession, in a literal way, can give no 
 assurance of restored possession, when it is once lost. 
 According to Leviticus, chap. 2G, however, it appears 
 that the covenant was conditioned upon obedience, 
 and its blessings lost through disobedience. Repent- 
 ance only could restore them when forfeited. How, 
 and how far, the Israelites would repent and the 
 blessings of the old covenants be theirs, is not declared. 
 No safe argument for a restored kingdom of Israel in 
 Canaan can possibly be urged from this covenant 
 
TIIK KINO DOM. 
 
 116 
 
 ina<l«' witli Ahnilijuii ami rcMU'Wod with Tsiuir aiul 
 
 A II<mm1 of li^^ht, liowevfM", is thiovvn upon tluj whole 
 <|U«'.stion l>y N«'W 'I'^staiiu'iit tt'ucliiii;;. So far a.s the 
 "Hoed" of Al)nihaiii was to l)0 tlu' iii(!<lium or chainicl 
 of l)I«'H.siii«r to "all uatioMH," l*aul (IcclarcH (ion. 22: IH, 
 "In thy .so(m1 .shall all thc^ iiatioriH of tlio eartli b« 
 hloHMe<i,' to have iHiceivod its fulfiliMcnt in CMirist 
 ((ial. M: 1(5): "Now to Ahrahani wrro tht* proiniNOH 
 spokt'M. Ho Haith not, And to HoodH, jih of many : 
 hut a.s of one, And to thy .sood, which is Chri.st." So 
 far as tho Hood of Ahrahain aro tho ohjocts of hlosH- 
 iu;;, it is of hlcHsinj^ which must come throu^jh Chri.st, 
 and as to thoso l»lo.sHin^.s, 'Thoro can ho noitlior Jew 
 nor Grook " ((Jal. .*i : 28), "circunjcision and uncircuin- 
 cision" (Col. 3 : 1 1), hut all aro one in Christ: so that, 
 "If yo bo Clnist's thon aro ye Ahraliam'.s Hcod, lioirs 
 according to tiio proniiso" ((iai. 3: 29), hocau.se in tho 
 f^ospol disponsation, "Ho is not a Jew which is one 
 outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is out- 
 ward in the Hosh ; but he i.s a .Jew which i.s one 
 inwardly: and circumcision is that of tho heart, in 
 the spirit not in tho letter" (Rom. 2 : 28, 29). They 
 "are the circumcision" — the Jews in the gospel sen.se 
 — "who worship God in the spirit," etc. (Phil. 3: 3). 
 Therefore it is that the "middle wall of partition ' is 
 broken down so that the Ephesian Gentiles who had 
 been "alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and 
 stranj^ers from the covenants of the promise" might 
 have the fullest participation in all their blessings 
 through the common condition of accepting the 
 
Il({ 
 
 A S'rrDV IN EMCIIATol.OdV. 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 >l 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 eM 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 ■'(M 
 
 
 
 
 is 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 
 1 j 
 
 1 
 
 
 i 
 
 ! 
 it 
 
 1; 
 
 il 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 
 ^iu 
 
 
 rjospd (Kpli. *2 : 11-10). ami tlms Iwcftmo "fellow- 
 licii'N iiikI i'l'llow-iiiniilH'i'H (>r tilt; Ixxly hii*1 rdiow- 
 purtiikrrH of tlu> ])roiiiiHo in ('lirist .Icsiim tlirou^^li 
 tlu» ;;oMjn'l " (Kpli. M : (I). All tlh' hlt'SMiii^H of tlu* 
 covciiJintM imuh' to AI)niliHiit, tlu'reforc, instcud of <lt'- 
 HC'ciulin^ to his litt-nil h(!i,(I, Jirr iiiln'rit('<l hy lioIirvorH, 
 vvlictlwr tln»y ho Juvvm or C}riitii«'H. On the other 
 IiuikI, HOIK! of liicst' lilcNMinn^H Mhiill <l»'H(M'ii(l to uiiy 
 Ix'cjiu.se of men' iK'shly ih'HiM'Mt, l)e they Jc^wh or (ien- 
 tiloH. The llcshly lino of mitiinil deHceiit isHueH in 
 the Hpirituui line of those who are cliiMreii of Ahra- 
 haiii tlirou;;h haviii;^ like faith (Koin. 4: HI). If, 
 therefore, these piouiiseH of the covenant made to 
 Al)rahani assure to any tlie j)ossession of the land of 
 Canaan and a national rule, it will be to all believers 
 and not to the .lews as a p- '>ple. Hut if the New 
 Testament interpretation of the promises of this cov- 
 enant forbid that they be taken literally for the natu- 
 ral secid of Abraham, why are wo recpiiied to hold 
 that the inheritance is the literal and physical 
 Canaan ;* The truth is, if the Jews are to be restored 
 to their old land as a people, we must depend U])on 
 other Scriptures than the covenant promise to Abra- 
 ham to assure us of it. 
 
 Pre-millennialists, however, believe that the cov- 
 enant made with David not only confirms their inter- 
 pretation that the one to Abraham assures the restor- 
 ation of Canaan to Israel, but also makes it plain that 
 our Lord shall reif^n over restored Israel in person, 
 and involves their whole doctrine of His glorious and 
 visible rule over all the earth. Let us examine the 
 
TIIK KINCiDoM. 
 
 117 
 
 IcrtnH of tlnM Piivifllr rovcnutit, to hov wIh'Out HiIm 
 conclusion is justifird. 
 
 This covoiwmt is first j;ivrn in 2 Sum. 7 : 1- IS, 
 rspccijilly V. 16: "An<l thy lioiisi' iinil tliy kiri;^<i<nn 
 mIiuII 1m« iuikK' sure I'on'vcr Im-I'imt tlict* : tliy tlirono 
 slmll in5 «'stal>liMlin| fon-ver." It is rcfcnrd to in l*s. 
 H9:4: "Thy sctMl will I t'stalilisli I'oiovor, aiul huiM 
 up thy throiu' to all ;;rn«'nitions," an<l rojicato*] in vs. 
 •J!>, Mf), 'Mi in Kul)s(aii(ially thr sainr trrnis. It is also 
 of this covenant that ilcrciiiiah sjx'aks (Jcr. MM : '21): 
 "Then may also my covenant he hiukiMi with David 
 my servant, that he shouM not have a son to rei^ni 
 upon liis tiirono ' (as specified in v. 17): "David shall 
 never want a man to sit upon the throne of the h<mse 
 of Israel." Similarly he declares of tlu^ Jewi.sli wor- 
 ship, "Neither shall the priests the Levites want a 
 man hefore me to offer burtit off\'rin^^s, and to burn 
 ohiations, and to «lo sacrifice continually" (v. IH). 
 
 Now, no literal interpi'etatioii of these covemmt 
 promi.ses which makes them refer to a rule over 
 Israel as a pc'ople, or to the ancient priestly and 
 li(!vitical oflerin^^s and sacrifices, can ho carrie«l 
 throu^^di. They assure an unbroken rule of David's 
 seed, and nn unbroken succession of priests and Le- 
 vites offering ^ifts and sacrifices before the Lord. 
 The rule is over Israel, and the priests and Levites 
 perfonnin<( their functions are in Israel. Any inter- 
 pretation to serve the literalists in their claim that 
 these j)assa<^es assure the restoration of the Jews to 
 their old land, to enjoy rule and ^lory under David's 
 greater Son, is an interpretation wliich proves these 
 
- ■! •■ 
 
 I •:• 
 
 |i lili 
 1 ^ 
 
 
 1; 
 
 ik^ *^ 
 
 ll.s 
 
 A STCDY IN ESCIIATOLOGY. 
 
 prophecies falHo. The unbroken rule of David'H line, 
 and the unbroken succession of priests, Levites and 
 sacrifices, are as clearly declared as the fact of the 
 rule an<l pri«!sthood, and sacrifices. But there has 
 been neither kinjjf on the throne of Israel, nor sacri- 
 fices, for nearly two thousand years. Neither the one 
 nor the other has been unbroken, if they must be 
 taken literally. Unless these are to be held as false 
 prophecies, they must be interpreted in some other 
 way. 
 
 Not less do the terms of these prophecies, in other 
 respects, as we have seen vs true of other prophecies, 
 render this interpretation impossible. The priests, 
 Levites and sacrifices are declared to be perpetual in 
 the same terms as is the rule. So lonj^, therefore, as 
 Christ shall sit on His throne, in the sense Pre-millen- 
 nialists hold that He will, so long must priests, Levites 
 and sacrifices continue, in the same sense. The priests 
 and sacrifices nuist be as literal .as the reign, and con- 
 tinue as long. How many of the Pre-inillennialists 
 of to-day are willing to accept this necessary outcome 
 of their interpretation, and believe a restored Judaism 
 to be the final issue of Christianity ? But, if they 
 say that we are not required to believe that priests, 
 etc., are ever to continue the same literal priests and 
 sacrifices as at the beginning, why then mu.st the rule 
 necessarily continue to be of the same visible and 
 personal kind as was David's ? 
 
 So also the reign of David's line was to be over Israel. 
 Not oidy is there no mention made of any other 
 than Israelites as under this rule, but all others than 
 
THE KINGDOM. 
 
 119 
 
 hey 
 
 IsnicliteH and their proaelyti'S arc expreaaly ruled out 
 in oilier pa.ssa<^e.s. Not only the uncircumcised in 
 heart, but tJie uncircunici.sed in Heah, are excluded from 
 the sanctuary (E/ek. 44 : 9, which, is held to be a de- 
 scription of the millennial kingdom). The Davidic 
 line is as plainly declared to rule over Israel exclu- 
 sively, meaning by Israel the Jews, their proselytes 
 and subjects, as it is promised rule at all. If the rule, 
 therefore, must continue to be of the same personal 
 and visible kind as was David's at the beginning, so 
 nmst it be over the same Israel exclusively as that 
 which David ruled. This, then, is one aspect of the 
 state of things to which the pre-millennial interpre- 
 tation commits us as the final outcome of the religious 
 growth of the ages. A triumphant Jewish nation, 
 and an everlasting Judaism. In Christ there is to be 
 Jew and Gentile. The middle wall of partition is to 
 be restored. The Jews, notwithstanding their long 
 rejection of Christ, are not only to be saved, but are 
 to be exalted to supreme dignity over those who have 
 accepted Him centuries before. The descendants of 
 the Jews who have been accepting Him from the first 
 age, and, from intermarriage with Gentiles, have lost 
 their connection with their own ancient people, will 
 have to take lower rank than those who have per- 
 sistently opposed Him until His second coming. All 
 Christians, Gentiles as well as Jews, as a reward for 
 their earlier submission to Christ, will be required to 
 accept the Jewish ritual, and take inferior rank under 
 those who have resisted Him till the end. 
 
 No, our pre-millennial brethren cannot accept this 
 
 tm 
 
120 
 
 A STUDY IN ESL'IIATOLOOY. 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 ■V 
 
 
 tti {iJlhiil 
 
 1 i-^! 
 
 ai-.iii::i;::, ,1:. 
 
 
 outcome of their literal into'pretation. But it' they 
 aflmit these prophecies do not .shut us in to Christ's 
 personal and visible rei^n over Israel exclusively, why 
 should they shut us in to a personal rei^n at all, seeing 
 that both the reif:rn itself and the fact that it is over 
 Israel, are declared with equal explicitness to be literal 
 forever, if literal at all or for either ? 
 
 But is there an interpretation which is less open 
 to objection ? We believe there is, and that it is given 
 by the New Testament writers, especially the apostle 
 Paul. 
 
 Our Lord was the antitype of David. Peter declares 
 this at Pentecost. It was not of himself that David 
 said, " My flesh shall rest in hope because thou wilt 
 not leave my soul in Hades, neither wilt thou give 
 thy Holy One to see corruption" (Acts 2 : 2G-28; 
 comp. Ps. 1G:10), but of "the resurrection of the 
 Christ" (v. 31). Peter also declares David "being a 
 prophet and knowing that God had sworn with an 
 oath to him," in that very covenant promise of 2 Sam. 
 7 : 16, from which Pre-millennialists derive their chief 
 argument for a reign of Christ on earth, " that of the 
 fruit of his loins he would set one upon his throne ; 
 he foreseeing this spake of the resurrection of the 
 Christ " (vs. 30, 31). " Being therefore," .Peter fur- 
 ther explains, " by the right hand of God exalted," 
 through the resurrection, and, most certainly, to this 
 promised throne of David, " and having received of 
 the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath 
 poured forth," in the exercise of His kingly function 
 on this throne, " this which ye see and hear." Peter 
 
THE KIXUDOM. 
 
 121 
 
 furtlior (leclaniH that IN. 110: 1 is an «>xpn»HH pnMlic- 
 tioii of Chri.st's exaltation to tlie throne promised to 
 David'H seed in 2 Sam. 7 : 10, an<l from which ho lias 
 poured out the Holy (Jhost (vs. 34, Ho). " Let all tlie 
 house of Israel, therefore," in view of the ar«^un>ent 
 he has just concluded — this house of Israel that has 
 crucified Christ and is expectin<; jMessiah to come as 
 a national ruler, as do Pre-millennialists — let Israel 
 know assuredly the truth which runs counter to their 
 l)itterest prejudices " that God hath made him both 
 Lor<l and Christ" (v. 3G). He is now, as iMessiah, 
 seated on the throne of the Messiah promised to David 
 and to his seed. Can this laniruaire and this artrument 
 be forced to mean that our Lord was not to ascend 
 this promised throne, and to exercise His autliority as 
 the antitype of David, until thousands of years should 
 pass { Peter virtually says, Israel is looking for a 
 Messiah who is to reign from an earthly throne. He 
 is to rei<;n, but from the throne in heaven, whither 
 He went wlien He was raised from the dead and 
 ascended on high. Do not reject Him as though He 
 were not a king. He is a king, and is now ruling 
 from the throne promised to His father David. 
 
 In Acts 5 : 29-31, Peter, in a similar way, associates 
 our Lord's resurrection with His exaltation to regal 
 authority : " The God of our fathers raised up Jesus 
 whom ye slew, hanging him on a tree, him did God 
 exalt with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, 
 for to give repentance to Israel, and remission of sins." 
 This rule, as a prince, is doubtless tha lich he had 
 already spoken of at Pentecost, which fulfilled the 
 
122 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 covenant j)roiniHO(l to David, tliat he should not want 
 a man to sit on his throne, an<l the only rule of Christ 
 of which Peter ^ives any Itint anywhere. 
 
 Similarly James (in Acts 15 : 15 w/.) interprets 
 the prophecy of Amos (9 : 11 w/.), "And I will 
 build a<ifain the tabernacle of David which is fallen, 
 and I will build a^ain the ruins thereof, and I will set 
 it up, that the residue of men may seek after the 
 Lord and all the Gentiles," as affording proof that 
 the Gentiles are to share in the promises to Israel, 
 and as already in process of fulHlment in the conver- 
 sion of the Gentiles as represented by the case of 
 Cornelius.* 
 
 Heb. 10: 12, 13 seems absolutely conclusive that 
 Christ's present rule is the rule He will exercise 
 till the end. " But he, when he had offered one sac- 
 rifice for sins forever, sat down on the right hand of 
 God : from henceforth expecting till his enemies be 
 made the footstool of his feet." If this does not de- 
 clare that He is to sit on the seat at the right hand 
 of God to which He was exalted from the cross and 
 grave, until all His enemies are vanquished, what 
 does it mean ? His present rule will, then, continue 
 to the end. How any can, in view of this passage, 
 hold that our Lord must leave this very seat at God's 
 right hand, from which " he expects till his enemies 
 shall be made the footstool of his feet " and assume 
 
 m 
 
 * Dr. ftordon regards Acts 15 : 14-18 as the "programme of 
 Redemption." He makes v. 14 I'efer to the gathering out of the 
 (Jeiitiles — the first act ; v. !(!, the conversion and restoration of 
 Lsrael at Christ's personal coming — the second act; v. 17, the con- 
 version of the worUl in the millennium— the third act. This is 
 eisegesis surely. 
 
 
THE KIN(M)()M. 
 
 123 
 
 jUK)tli()r tlinuio, wliich thoy aHHume to bo His own (or 
 David'.s), ill (liHtiiiclion to tluH, which thoy say is His 
 K.'itherH, before His cnetnios can be Hulxhied, is pa.sH- 
 in^ Htranj^^e. Nay, more; liow they can beheve tliat 
 the world is to f^row worse nnd worse, and men be- 
 come more and more rebellious and hardened a<^ainst 
 His rule so lonj; as He sits on His throne at the 
 Father's ri^ht iiand, is stranger still, when it is de- 
 clare<l that His enemies are to bo made the footstool 
 of His feet before He leaves it. Similarly conclusive 
 is that much-abused passage (I Cor. 15: 23-20): 
 " But each in his own order, Christ the firstfruits : 
 then they that are Christ's at his coming. Then 
 Cometh the end, when he shall deliver up the king- 
 dom to God, even the Father: when he shall have 
 abolished all rule and all authority and power. For 
 he must reign, till he hath put all his enemies under 
 hio feet. The last enemy that shall be abolished is 
 death." When it is said here " he must reign till," 
 etc., does this mean He shall continue to reign as 
 now, or He shall only begin to reign in the reign 
 which shall "put all his enemies under his feet," at 
 some distant future time ? The latter meaning is im- 
 possible. When, also, is the time of the end, " when 
 he shall have delivered up the kingdom to the 
 Father"? It is not to be "until he has put all his 
 enemies under his feet." The last of these is death, 
 and death is put beneath His feet in the resurrection. 
 Now, what was the resurrection that Paul could have 
 suppose<l vaiKpiished death and gave the limit to our 
 Lord's mediatorial rule, at which He surrendered it 
 
 IP 
 
 11 
 
 <i 
 
 i 
 
124 
 
 A STI'DV IN' KSCIIATOIJKJV. 
 
 fhU 
 
 into tho hjinds of the Fatlicr, but tlie iVHurrectioii 
 about wliich lie was troatin<; at lenj^th ? 
 
 Now, thiH, ns our pre-milltMniial friends ^^enorally 
 hold, was tho resurrection of the rijj^hteous. It is 
 then that all enemies, even to the last of them, have 
 been put beneath His feet. It is then that He com- 
 pletes His work on earth. 
 
 Instead of bej^innin*:; to rei^n in His kin<^dom, when 
 He comes and raises the ri<^hteous dead, it is then He 
 surrenders His rule. Instead of cominjj^ to lift a sink- 
 ing; cause up into triumph. His enemies are all sub- 
 dued when He comes to destroy th(! last enemy, death, 
 in the resurrection of the righteous he is describing. 
 
 Is it too much to affirm that the pre-millennial in- 
 terpretation of the Old Testament prophecies of tho 
 throne of David and the perpetual reign of his seed 
 is dashed to pieces l)y the teaching of the New Testa- 
 ment ? Christ as tho Son of David has already taken 
 up into himself all the kingly authority promised 
 to his seed, and is already ruling on the prophetic 
 throne of David. The rule He is now exercisiuij: from 
 heaven is the only kind of rule He shall ever wield 
 over the earth. Old Testament prophecy interpreted 
 in the light of New Testament teaching gives no sup- 
 port to the idea of a visible reign of Christ on earth. 
 Thus interpreted, the promises that David should 
 never want a man to sit on his throne is fulfilled. 
 Up to the time of our Lord's first coming, the de- 
 scendants of David continued to have a kind of rule 
 over the Jews. Since He came and ascended on high. 
 He has been exercising a higher form of kingly 
 
THE KINf;D()M. 
 
 125 
 
 
 authority, julaptod to tho julvunco in .spirituality of 
 the new (lisjx'Usation uh coiiipaiHid with the oM, ovor 
 the antityjK' of Lsnud, and this is never to end. 
 
 Now, thJH l>ein^ eHtahlished, all things else nmst 
 adjust theniHelves around thin more Hj)iritual concep- 
 tion of Clirist's rule. There is no need of a national 
 Israel for Him to <^overn. Nay, a rule, includini; all 
 the functitmH of civil ^(ovei'nmont, as Dr. Nicliolson 
 holds, would be inconsistent altot^cther with a spirit- 
 ual rule over the hearts of men, such as our [.lord 
 lunv wields, and is to wield perpetually. So we find 
 that the true Israelites, in the New Testament sense 
 — those who are the children of the promise made to 
 Abraham and his seed — are those who receive life 
 from Christ, the seed in whom all naticma should be 
 blessed, and who have the same faith that made 
 Abraham the object of blessintr. The Jews, through 
 their unbelief, were broken ott* from this believing 
 stock (Rom. 11 : 17 «7.), and the believin^^ Gentiles 
 are grafted in and partake of all the root and fatness 
 of the olive tree. Just as David and his natural de- 
 scendants ruled over natural Israel, so there is a 
 spiritual Israel in which " neither circumcision nor 
 uncircumcision avails anything, but a new creature," 
 and over which our Lord sways His spiritual sceptre, 
 and both sway and people are the only sway and 
 people, until the end. 
 
 All this is further confirmed by the fact that there 
 is no hint in the New Testament of a restored Jewish 
 nation, much less of a restored Jewish nation with 
 priests and sacrifices and supremacy. The heart of 
 
 if 'I 
 
126 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 Piiul vvjiM coiisuiikmI with loii^^iiijj- for tho wrlfiirc of 
 liis pooplc, (jHpociiilly JIM In; was penning tlu! oulliiio of 
 thoir futiin' in UomaiiH, cliaps. 9- 1 1. Surely if ilio 
 ^lory of a national restoration undc'r (Christ as visible 
 kin«jf was to he theirs, mention woul<l l)e nia<h' of it 
 here. Hut tlie <(reat hope whicli eomforted Paul and 
 was to comfort liis fellow-countrymen who had be- 
 lieved, and which also exhausted the fulness of the 
 promises an<l vindicated the divim; faitld'ulness, was 
 the preservation of a faitliful remnant before Christ 
 came, wlio were the real "children of the promise" 
 wliich are "reckoned for a seed" (9 : 0-10, 27), the 
 preservation of a believing renuiant after He had ap- 
 peared (11 : 1-8), and the salvation of " all 1 rael," 
 after " the fulness of the Gentiles be come in," through 
 the taking away of their sins (11 : 25-27). It is the 
 reception of the Jews to the blessings of the Gospel, 
 which are common to Jews and Gentiles alike, on the 
 common condition of faith. They are to be grafted 
 in as a shoot among the Gentile branches wliich have 
 long been growing on the old root of promised spirit- 
 ual blessings. They are to be saved in the same 
 sense as, and in no other sense tlian, the fulness of 
 the Gentiles, All Israel is to be saved because all 
 Israel, one by one, is to believe. Both Alford and 
 Meyer, though favoring the pre-millennial view in 
 some things, declare that the prophetic expression, 
 " There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer" (v. 2G), 
 means merely that the Redeemer should spring from 
 Israel, and gives no hint of His coming to reign over 
 the Jews on earth. 
 
 hi 
 
 k 
 
THE KINrmOM. 
 
 127 
 
 Neither is it ho <lit!ieult to conceive w'ly lln' Ijui- 
 ^im^^e oF ()l«l 'rcstument jjiophcey ol' Hpiiituiil l)l<'N.sin<; 
 in the new MiMpcnMution Hhould be in teriM.soi' natiotnil 
 l)leHMinj^ to national Israel. Is it Htian;;e, For instance, 
 tliat tli(! ruh; oF I ))ivi( I'm greater Son hIiouM he spoken 
 oF as still located in Jerusalenj, the seat oF David's 
 line, and that its power and hicssin^ should he repre- 
 sented as continuinj^ to ^o Foith From this ])lacc, 
 which had for loiii; ai'cs been the centre oF (iod's 
 iiianiFestations to Israel i Is it stranjjje that the 
 hi«;hest religious service an<l worship in the ^dorious 
 and spiritual gospel era, should be in ti^rins of the 
 priesthood, sacrifices and Feasts, which represented 
 the hitchest conception that prophet or people had of 
 them? The descriptions oF the triumphs oF tin; ^(ospel 
 dispensation of peace and ^mice, as couched in the 
 lan^ua<je of victories on fields oF blood, may be under- 
 stood, when we remember that this is the only kind 
 of victory for God which the Israelites knew. These 
 prophecies were all addressed to Israei'tes. In any 
 other lancruage than that which to them most nearly 
 represented the truth to be communicated, the pro- 
 pliecies would have been unintelligible. 
 
 They were yet unprepared for the conception of a 
 spiritual rule of Christ from heaven. His reign must 
 be represented in terms of the rule which to them 
 was most glorious, and most like His rule which was 
 to be. Equally unable were they to conceive of 
 religion without priests and sacrifices. The religion 
 of the gospel age was, therefore, represented in the 
 terms of their own, lifted up and purified to the 
 utmost. And so of all the rest. Even in the New 
 
128 
 
 A STUDY IN EhCMATOLOOV. 
 
 
 If < 
 
 'I'r.stjuiH'iit ill tlic l)<M»k of Kcvrlatioii wo liiivt; tli« 
 
 IICHCcI'llI COIKlUt'.st.S of tllC (tOHjU'I, ail«l i\\V st I'llJ^^^lfH ol' 
 
 tho ('liun'li, n'pr.'Montod in Homo pjisHugoH in tliu lan- 
 gUJi^(5 of huttlo ami <»!' l)l()()«l. 
 
 In coiifiriiiatioii of all tliis, as we liavo Heeii, ho much 
 of ()I<1 TcstaiiK'iit prophecy rcHpt'ctin«( Israel, the 
 kin;,^(loiii mikI rt'i;^ni of Messiah, etc., as is explained by 
 New 'restaiiiciit writers, is ref«'rrc<l hy them to the 
 spiritual Israel of which th*' nation was the type, and 
 to the present kingdom and reign of Christ on earth. 
 Not one of those propliecies is referred by them to a 
 natural and national Israel. Must we not, therefore, 
 interpret the prophecies to which New Tcistament 
 writers make no nd'erence, in the one and only way 
 they explain those they do explain ? To do otherwise 
 woidd 1)0 the liei^ht of presumption. 
 
 We also call special attention to anotlu'r point. 
 Many pro-millennial writers admit that, literally 
 interpreted, Old Testament prophecy is almost, if not 
 alto;^ether, silent about the Church and the history 
 of God's people in the whole gospel age, from Pente- 
 cost until the second advent. The exigencies of their 
 theory seem to demand this position. For instance, 
 Blackstone says, " The church came in mystery and 
 was but rarely, if at all, spoken of in Old Testament 
 prophecies."* 
 
 Mcintosh declares: "There is not so much as a single 
 syllable about the church of God, the body of Christ, 
 from cover to cover of the Old Testament. "i* 
 
 * •• Jesus is Coming." p. 59. 
 
 t " Papers on the Lord's Coining," p. 22, 
 
 It 
 
THF KixnnoM. 
 
 12!» 
 
 Dr. hrookos : "Tlu» church jih now cxiHtiii;;, foriiiin;^ 
 the iny.stical h(Miyjunl hri<l«' ()f ('hrist, wjih not known 
 to th«' Old Testuinrnt prophrtH."* 
 
 For Htatonionts ho positivo and involvin;; ho much 
 that iH W('Il-ni;;h increclihli', th»y (K'|M'n(l for proof 
 chiclly upon Kpli. 8: .'>-!), wliicli nioroly <k'cIart'H that 
 tlio niyHtcry npokcn of had not lu-on ho clearly nm<l(» 
 known, in the othrr ^ciU'ratiouH, an it wan now 
 p'Vralt'd to the apoHtlos an«l prophets of the new 
 (liHponHntion. 
 
 'I'he literal an<l pre-iniliennial interpretation, then, 
 recjuires uh to helicve that the prophets whosf visionn 
 were clear and explicit rej^ardin;^ onr Lord'n first 
 coiiiini;. His lifts death, resurrection, ascension aiul 
 the pourin<^ out of the Spirit, see nothing; < f the \on^ 
 a«^es which were to follow, as the ('hurcli arose and 
 Mis diHci[)les, in the power of the Spirit, sou^lit to 
 fulfil the partin*^ instructions of their Lord, hy preach- 
 in"^ tlie (lospel to the whole creation. After this 
 centuries lon^ blank in proplietic vision, when only 
 obscure hints rise up out of the dense darkness of the 
 unrevealed ; then, away beyond the second coinintj of 
 the Lord, the far horizon is all a^low with li<jfht, as 
 seer after seer gives enraptured descriptions of a 
 kinjjfdoni, a rule and a restored Israel, in a glory which 
 is to be peri)etual. There lies against the forcing of 
 the literal interpretation tlirougli Old Testament pro- 
 })lu'cy, with all that it involves, the tremendous 
 pivsuniption against the belief that there should be 
 
 Maranatha," p. 438. 
 
 9 
 
130 
 
 A MTl'DV IN KS«||AT(M,o<JV. 
 
 this ^iviit liiiidiM in propliocy coV(>rin^ all tli«^ <liN)ii>ti- 
 Hjition of tlio Spirit tli«' wry liiiu', w«? iiii;;lit wi«ll 
 Hiip[)<)H«>, tlitit would (ill to tli«> full the proplirtic 
 vJHiori of the future tlmt tlh> Mfcoii<l coiiiiii;;, in 
 prophecy, HUCcoudH thu tirnt with next to notlung 
 botwiM'n. 
 
 If our iir^unient has force, uikI the colh'Ctivo Ixxiy 
 of U'liovers is tlie antitype of prophetic Israel, thou 
 tliis oxtravat^ant assuniptioii is without fouutlatiou. 
 IVrhaps it may l)o well to refer to a few uuivo. pas- 
 Ha;^es which support our position, and some also which 
 aro in <lirect conflict with this idea that prophecy <lid 
 not have the present <liHp(!nsation in its visi<»ns of the 
 future. Peti^r writinj^ to the elect of the dispensation, 
 " in sanctifieation of the Spirit, unto obedience and 
 sprinkling of the bloo<l of .Jesus C'hrist," declares (1 
 Pet. 2: 5): " Ye nrlso as livinj^ stones are built up a 
 spiritual house, to be a holy priisstliood, to oH'er up 
 spiritual sacriHces, acceptable to (iod through Jesus 
 Christ." He continues in v. : " Hut ye are an elect 
 race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for 
 God's own possession." Whether Peter is writinff to 
 Jewish Christians alone, or to mixed churches of 
 Jewish and Gentile converts, the teaching; is the .same. 
 Gathering up all that the Israelites had been, and 
 still claimed to be, to God, Peter turns away from 
 natural Israel to these scattered believers, and declares 
 them to be the antitype of (iod's ancient people: 
 *' Ye are an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy 
 nation, a people for God's own possession." Yc do not 
 possess a material temple, as did Israel, but ye consti- 
 
THR KINcnoM. 
 
 ini 
 
 lute H tt'iiiplc, as yu "UN living sioiuvs iirt; Ixiilt up u 
 Hpirituul lioiiMr " Y«', Its "iilioly prirMtluMMl," " «>tK'i' 
 up spiritual sacriMcfN," of wliicli ilm oM utlorin^js 
 will Ik? I)ut thr material type. F«>r IN'tur, i\ui .Ifwi.sh 
 " riico," " nation," " prirHtlKMxl," " pooph?," " .sarriUcuH," 
 " tiMiiplu " lia<l tli«Mr iii;;li(>r an*i aiititypioal roali/atiou 
 in l)«'liuvurH. Tlio natural and material had isHUcii in 
 the spiritual. So far as we can ju<l^<' from his 
 uritir>;;s, all the promises to prophetic Israel had their 
 fultilnient in helii^vers. Of a retro;^ression from the 
 H|)i ritual antityp(; to the fleshly and material typo 
 Pt'ter seems to have known nothint;. 
 
 Paul in Hom. !) : 24-27 (|Uotes IIos. 2 : 2'.] and 1 : 10, 
 which was spoken l>y the proj)het coneeriH'n<;a rcHtora- 
 tion of Israel to favor, as covering; the reception of 
 (lentiles a.s well as tiews under tlu^ (Jospel, to he tho 
 Lord's people. This prophecy, which refeii'cfl primarily 
 to the restoration from the captivity, Paul declarea 
 to have its antitypical fulfilment in tho <^osj)el day. 
 
 In Gal. 4: 2l-.'n Paul declares that two .sons of 
 Ahraham, I.shmael hy a handmaid, and Isaac l»y a free- 
 woman, furnish an alle;^ory. The former was horn 
 .'liter the flesh, the latter hy promise. Ishmael horn of 
 llaj^^ar, corresponded to the old covenant from Sinai, 
 and was represented by Jeru.salem as it then was in 
 hondage with her children; Lsaac corresponde*! to 
 tlie Jeru.salem that is above and free, of whom all 
 l)elievers are children. In the reception of believers 
 into the churcli was fulfilled, in its (grandest and final 
 Ht'M.se, fsa. 54: 1, which referred directly to Lsrael. 
 Hence, Paul conclu<les, " We brethren, as Lsaac was 
 
 ■ iilf 
 
 IH 
 
132 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCirATOLOCY. 
 
 II 
 
 are children of promise." We believerH are the real 
 IsraelitoH, the real children of promise with Isaac. 
 
 In Hel). 8 : 6 wy., the two covenants are compared. 
 Tlie first was that made with the Israelites, when 
 God delivered them from Kgypt. The second, or new 
 covenant, is that of the new dispensation of the Gos- 
 pel, as is seen in the succeeding elaboration of the 
 author's thouijht. Yet this new covenant — of the 
 t^ospel dispensation as explained in Hebrews — is sai<l, 
 in the proj)hecy in Jer. ."31 : .'31-34, as quoted, to be 
 made ' with the house of Israel and with the liouse 
 of Judah " (Heb. 8: 8). The promise of a new cov- 
 enant to Israel and Judah is fulfilled, under the Gos- 
 pel, to all who accept Christ by faith and are regen- 
 erated. If promises made explicitly to Israel are 
 interpreted by New Testament writers as fulfilled in 
 the new dispensation in believers, whether of Jew or 
 Gentile, they must have identified the Israel of these 
 prophecies with believers. 
 
 Almost all of Hebrews is to explain how the nation 
 and religion of Israel have their hiirhest realization 
 in Christ and Christianity. The author gives us not 
 the remotest hint that there was any promise or cov- 
 enant to Israel which was to be fulfilled in any other 
 way than in their partaking of the common salva- 
 tion, and sharing in its blessings, which are for all 
 alike. His wdiole argument goes to show that all the 
 prophetic promises to Israel, so far as he knew them, 
 were to be fulfilled in this way, and in this way only. 
 
 Again in Rom. 10 : 18-21 Paul (juotes prophecies 
 
 I "1 
 
 
 iii. 
 
,1 
 
 THE KINGDOM. 
 
 r,v.] 
 
 which he interprets as fulfilled in the conversion of 
 the Gentiles which was then in pro<;res.s, and in Rom. 
 15: 9VA he refers the reader to several otliers which 
 hi! interprets as bein<; fulfilled in the same way. It 
 is especially noticeable that he (quotes the theocratic 
 passage, "There shall be the root of Jesse, and he 
 that aristjth to ride over the Gentiles, on him shall the 
 Gentiles hope" (v. 12), where the Messiah is referred 
 to in His kint^ly dij^nity, and in the exercise of His 
 royal rule as a prophetic description of the spiritual 
 subjection of the Gentiles to Christ through their 
 conversion, and having no reference to a future per- 
 sonal rule of our Lord on earth. 
 
 In this connection we refer again to Rom. 11 : 25- 
 .')2, but especially to vs. 25-29 : " For I would not have 
 you ignorant of this mystery, lest ye be wise in your 
 own conceits, that a hardening in part hath befallen 
 Israel, until the fulness of the (Jentiles be come in : and 
 so, all Israel shall be saved, as it is written : There 
 shall come out of Zion the Deliverer : he shall turn 
 away ungodliness from Jacob ; and this is my cov- 
 enant unto them, when I shall take away their sin." 
 
 Just as certainly as Paul in the passages before 
 referred to interprets the prophets as foretelling the 
 conversion of the Gentiles, and their reception into 
 the Church, so in this passage just as surely does he 
 interpret another prophecy as declaring the conversion 
 of the Jews, and their gathering into the Church. 
 Sanday, the last and one of the best conunentators on 
 Romans, explains v. 20 : " 8o the words of Paul mean 
 simply that the people of Israel as a nation, and no 
 
 ( » '■: 1 
 
-*?»^p 
 
 m 
 
 134 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOfJY. 
 
 ! 
 
 hi 
 
 I ■:;!':' 
 
 longer in part, shall be united with the Christian 
 Church." Alford : " I have not mixed with the con- 
 sideration of this })rophocy the (juestion of tlie restora- 
 tion of the Jews to Palestine, as being clearly irrele- 
 vant to it : the matter here treated being their recep- 
 tion into the C/mrch of God." So, substantially, 
 Godet, Meyer, Moule, Philippi, " Biblical Commentary," 
 etc. 
 
 We cannot do better than (|Uote from Meyer's note 
 on this passage, concurred in by Philippi. As these 
 both sympathize with some phases of the pre-millen- 
 nial view, the testimony has all the more force 
 
 He says : " Observe further how the present passage 
 is in diametrical opposition to the opinion now received 
 in many (juarters of an actual restoration of Israel to 
 its theocratic royalty in Canaan. Israel does not take 
 in the church, but the church takes in Israel, and 
 whenever this takes place, Israel has its royalty and 
 its Canaan in the true sense." 
 
 Paul gives us in this eleventh chapter of Romans 
 his furthest and final word as to Israel's earthly 
 destiny. It is its salvation from sin, and its recep- 
 tion, as a whole, among the Lord's people, which have 
 been gathered into the Church from Gentiles and 
 from Jews " in part." All this is to be completed 
 before our Lord's second coming. ** There shall come 
 out of Zion the Deliverer " refers to his first coming, as 
 Alford suggests. " * Out of Zion ' summed up tlie 
 prophecies which declare that the Redeemer should 
 spring out of Israel." As Meyer well says, at His 
 
 'l^^!:ll 
 
THE KINGDOM. 
 
 135 
 
 second coining Christ comes as judge, not >us deliverer. 
 All Paul seems to see, as the fuK '.nient of prophecy in 
 case of Israel, was, therefore, Israel's conversion before 
 the second coming of Christ. Can we think him less 
 fully acquainted with the prophecies which Pre- 
 inillennialists believe assure a national life in Canaan 
 to Israel, then are they ; or was he less fitted to 
 interpret them correctly i Can we believe that here, 
 if he gave the pre-millennial interpretation to ajiy of 
 them, and he really saw that as a nation they were 
 to be raised to supreme glory, he would have been 
 silent, where he seems to give his last word as to their 
 earthly history ? Nay, it is much more rational to 
 believe that he interpreted the glowing prophecies as 
 to Israel's future, as Meyer says he did, according to 
 analogy with his identification of believers with the 
 true sons of Abraliam, and that " where the church 
 takes in Israel, Israel has its royalty and its Canaan 
 in its true sense." 
 
 Other passages might be adduced to prove that Old 
 Testament prophecies respecting Israel, as interpreted 
 by New Testament writers, are fulfilled in the gospel 
 day in believers whether Jewish or Gentile, and, also, 
 that in some of them, as thus interpreted, direct 
 reference is made to the gospel age, its progress, and 
 its final ti"* lmph^nt consun.i^i.ttion. The following 
 will repay tndy . 1 Pet. 1: 1012; 2 Cor. 6: 14-18; 
 Col. 2 : 16 sq., etc. We shall not pursue the subject 
 further. We call the reader's attention again to a 
 very significant fact. The New Testament writers 
 
 
<swi9l 
 
 w^t'itmL i ■ 
 
 RMi 
 
 136 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCHATOLOCJY. 
 
 I4BII!I 
 
 lapi'I 
 
 :i8i 
 
 interpret no Old Testament prophecy to which they 
 alhule as remaining to be fulfilled after our Lord is 
 to come again, or under any other than the present 
 gospel conditions. Had they regarded the great mass 
 of Old Testament prophecy respecting the future 
 glories of the Messiah's kingdom as to be fulfilled 
 only after His second advent, and under conditions 
 vastly dififerent, would they have abstained so abso- 
 lutely from all reference to them and interpretation 
 of them ? Those who hold they did both so believe 
 and so abstain, ought, at least, to favor us with some 
 rational explanation of so strange a silence. 
 
 A final point needs to be noticed in this discussion 
 of the nature of the kingdom. Our Lord speaks of 
 the Church but twice : Matt. 10 : 18 : " Upon this 
 rock will I build my church," and Matt. 18 : 17 : 
 " Tell it unto the church," etc. In Matthew alone He 
 speaks of the kingdom nearly fifty times, and upon 
 that His thoughts seem fixed. This was not only the 
 subject of the preaching of John the Baptist (Matt. 
 3:1), but also of our Lord from the beginning to the 
 end of His public ministry (Matt. 4 : 17; 9: 35, etc.). It 
 was the kingdom He commissioned the twelve to 
 preach (Matt. 10 : 7), and also the seventy (Luke 10: 
 11). It was the Gospel of the kingdom He foresaw 
 was to be preached among all the nations (Matt. 24 : 
 14). It was about the kingdom that His chief teach- 
 ings were gathered. 
 
 Thus it was with the Sermon on the Mount, as 
 generally interpreted, the prayer He taught His 
 
 IR'.l 111 
 
-;■ It 
 
 tiif: kixcdom. 
 
 I.S7 
 
 diHciplcH, i ^ most of His paraljlos (see Matt. 1'3), and 
 a large pL.^, of tlu; hulanco of His instructions. 
 
 Xow, if tlie kingdom is not to be eHtahlished until 
 after the second coming, as our pre-niillennial friends 
 declare, we are compelled to believe that all the 
 preaching of John, of our Lord, of the twelve, of the 
 seventy, the principles laid down in the Sermon on 
 the ]\I(nmt, all the teaching of the most of the 
 parables — the great body of the teaching and preach- 
 ing of our Lord and His disciples — had little direct 
 and prominent reference to all the ages which were 
 to crowd each other between His ascension and His 
 second coming. They all had direct and chief refer- 
 ence to a period in the dim distance, beyond centuries 
 on centuries of permeating principles and deepening 
 conflicts. Does it seem probable that our Lord, 
 speaking to His disciples whom He was about to send 
 forth to disciple all the nations, gave almost exclusive 
 attention, in His own preaching and teaching, to a 
 kingdom which was not to exist until all the work He 
 was thus to commission them to do had been done ? 
 Why should He take such pains to speak to the men 
 of His own generation of a kingdom which was not to 
 appear until ages on ages after they were to be in 
 their graves ? In speaking to those who were living 
 with Him Pie would surely refer chiefly to what was 
 immediately impending or already present, so far as 
 the earthly life of His people was concerned. Our 
 pre-millennial friends may well be asked to explain 
 how our Lord could have such scant thought for the 
 
 'Ml t 
 
 > ■ ; I ', 
 
"■^■^p 
 
 I'll 
 
 mi 11 
 
 m 1 1 
 
 1 1 i 
 
 1 '! 1 ! 
 
 1 1 ■■ 
 
 1 J] 1 i 
 
 138 
 
 A STUDY IN ESrHATOI.()(JY. 
 
 r 
 
 period just at hand, and which was to iinpoHO such 
 trenicndouH burdens and reHponaibilitieH upon thone 
 to whom He .spoke ^ 
 
 We liave thus endeavored to consider, with care 
 and candor, the evidence from the New Testament, 
 and from the Old Testament in tlie li^ht of tlie New, 
 as to the kin<(dom and rei^n of Christ. It has been 
 profitable to ourselves ; we hope the result may be of 
 some service to the reader. 
 
TIIK KVEK-IMMINENT C(»MIN(J OK Ol'Il LOUD. l.*J9 
 
 CHAPTKR IX. 
 
 THE EVEIMMMINKNT COMING OF OUR LOUD. 
 
 PliE-MiLLENNlALlsTS hold it to be the teaching of 
 the New Testanieiit that our Lortl's second and per- 
 sonal advent might occur at any time HubHe(iuent to 
 His ascension. In view of the possibility of His 
 innnediate return, all are conunanded to watch, lest 
 His coming take them by surprise and unprepared. 
 H' at least one thousand years must intervene before 
 this coming of the Lord, as the post-millennial view 
 demands, it is said this great event could not be 
 represented as possibly so near, or that men must thus 
 ever be on the watch lest it overtake them as a thief 
 in the night. As Blackstone tersely puts it : " Now 
 it is absolutely inconsistent with the construction of 
 the human mind thus to watch for an event which 
 we believe to be one thousand years or more in the 
 future." * 
 
 This argument, at first sight, appears more than 
 plausible. Were all the facts involved taken into 
 account in this statement it would be conclusive. 
 When these facts are weighed, however, we believe it 
 
 m 
 
 ;;l 
 
 •ui 
 m 
 
 * (< 
 
 Jesus is Coming," p. 438. 
 
iiip^ 
 
 14^ 
 
 A STI'DV I\ KSCIIAT()L<)(JV 
 
 I " 1 
 
 
 ij '\ i 
 
 1 ii 
 
 DC t'oiincl to Ih' exposed to ubjoctionH, ami to be 
 
 •jcd upon a ini.sconceptioii. 
 
 Lot us oxaiiiinc tlio facts of the New TeHtuincnt 
 teacliin<^ from the pre-iiiilleiiiiial .standpoint, that 
 alnioHt all the refereiice.s to tlie eoniinj; of the Lord 
 are to His second and personal advent. 
 
 There are passaj^es wldeli seem to teacli that tlie 
 time of His coming is left })erfectly indefinite. The 
 "day and liour" is known only by the Father (Matt 
 24 : .S()). Otliers know no more about the time than 
 does till' householder when the thief will come. His 
 coming will be when even His people think not, so 
 that the only safety against surprise is to bi' id ways 
 ready (Matt. 24: 42-44). It is ecjually uncertain 
 whether He will como "at even or at midnight, or at 
 cockcrowing, or in the morning" (Mark 18 : 35), 
 whether in the second watch or in the third (Luke 
 12 : 38). The coming may be at the beginning of the 
 period of possible expectation, it may be at its close, 
 it may be at any time, it is altogether uncertain ; the 
 only safety, therefore, is in perpetual watchfulness. 
 
 On the other hand, there are other passages which 
 just as clearly declare that the coming of the Lord is 
 nigh, and at hand. " The Lord is at hand," says Paul 
 (Phil. 4 : 5).* 
 
 " For yet a very little while, he that cometh shall 
 come, and shall not tarry," says the author of 
 Hebrews (chap. 10 : 37). " Be patient, therefore, 
 brethren, unto the coming of the Lord," " The coming 
 
 * Many interpreters regard this passage as referring to Christ's 
 ordinary presence with His people. 
 
THE KVKR-IMMINK\T (OMINfJ <)K Olll L()|{|>. 141 
 
 of the lionl JH at band," an<l " tlic .lud;^*' staiulctii 
 before the door.s," Hays .laiiie.s (5 : 7-!)). " 'I'lu; end of 
 all thiM;;s is at hand," .says I'oter (1 Pet. 4: 7). " Y« 
 shall not have ^oi»e through the cities of Israel till 
 the Son of man be come," said our Lord (Matt. 10: 
 2'}) in <,dvin;^ sjM'ciHe instructions to His a[)ostles 
 con('erinn<,' what woi'k they shoul 1 attempt, lind 
 which must l)e fultilled duriuir their li^e-tim(^ In 
 hiii'iMony with this He adds, " Verily I say unto ycai, 
 there be sonic of them tliat stand here which shall 
 in no wise taste of death till tiiey see tlie Son of man 
 coming in His kingdom" (Matt. 1(1:28), which .some 
 Pre-milleniiialists would make refer to His transhiiura- 
 tion six days after, ajjparently not noticinj^ that only 
 "some of them" to whom Ho was .speaking were to 
 live until they .saw Him coming in His kiuji^dom, and 
 not all of them, as was true when Ib^ was trans- 
 ti»i;ured. Besides, His transfiguration was oidy wit- 
 ne.s.S(Ml by three of His di.sciples, while He intimates 
 that all who were then alive should see Him comiiii: 
 in His kingdom. Finally, our Lord commissions 
 John to .say to the Church in Philadelphia, " I come 
 (juickly " (Rev. 3: 11), and His last word in Rev. 
 22 : 20 is " Yea I come quickly." 
 
 Nor is this all. The i^^norance of our Lord of the 
 future which is implied in the belief that He himself 
 thought He might come in person immediately after 
 His a.scension is utterly at variance with all our ideas of 
 His knowledge, and with what we are led to expect 
 from scripture teaching. That He did not know the day 
 and hour of His return by no means makes it neces- 
 
 H 
 
 
 I 
 
 n 
 
 
 , 1 . 
 
 ■ 1 * { 
 
 {V f: 
 
 n 
 
142 
 
 A STl'DY IN ESCIIATOMKiV. 
 
 ilillij 
 
 li 
 
 sary for us to HUppono that lli' knew notliiiij; of dui 
 futurt! of tlu» vvorlil'M lustory, which His t«;H('hiii^ jih to 
 tln' posHihU; iiiiiiiiiu'iicc of 1 1 is prr.soiial coiiiiii;^ fnmi 
 tlic lir.st would eompol uh to iicocpt. Ht» ami .scrip- 
 ture writ(»i*H <li<l know that His coiiiiuj; was to \n> 
 associated with the rcsiirrcctioii of the dead, the jud;^- 
 iiient, aud the end of the world If thry thou;;ht 
 that li(t iiii^ht come at any moment, then they must 
 have he(>n in utter i^jnoi'ance of anything' in tlm 
 history of the world ancl tlie nations, which was to 
 liapp(!ii after His ascension and hefore the en<l. But 
 they must have been awarc^ that there were prophe- 
 cies of cities and countries yet unfulfilled, or nnist 
 liave believed that the events in njference to them 
 miifht all ho rushed throui^h in almost no time, or that 
 all ref(!rred to what was to happen aft»'r the eiul of the 
 iifrQ. Of all tlu! history of the C/hurch.as the work of 
 our Lord on earth was to advance to its realization 
 throu<^h conflicts and varyini^ ex[)eriences as a^es and 
 a«(es went by, can we believe they knew so little that 
 they thout^ht it might all happen in a few months, 
 or, at most, years ? Indeed, this supposition that our 
 Lord and scripture writers thouj^ht that the second 
 personal advent and the end of the w^orld mi<^ht 
 happen at any moment after the ascension, recpiires us 
 to believe that all the time between, packed full, as 
 has been proved, of the (grandest history since the 
 world began, was an absolute blank to them, so far as 
 events demanding time to happen are concerned. When 
 we remember that the prophets of old had such sure 
 visions of the future, we can scarcely think that those 
 
TIIK KVKU-I.MMINKNT <OMINfl OF OlH I.OIIO. 148 
 
 who lui<l tlu' hi^jhcst position tiiul llu' clt'jin'st li«;!it 
 of rrvulatioii of tlio new iliHpriisation tnucli Iohs ctui 
 wu tliink that out' Lord liiinsrlt', cvtMi wliilu in IIIh 
 state of huiuiliatioii -knew notliiii;; of what was to 
 ha[){)(Mi on earth until Itis scicoml coinin;^. Inter- 
 preterH ;;etieraily, including; IVc-niillennialiHts, Hce in 
 Olil ToHtainent pro|)hecy, especially in Daniel, ar> out- 
 line of history Htretchin;^ for c«'nturi«'s heyond our 
 Lord's life on earth. Take the seventh ehaptisr of 
 Daniel, for Instance. The last of the four Ixiasts, hy 
 common consent, repnjsiujts th<' Roman Kmpire. Up 
 to the end of the apostolic a<;e Home was in the 
 heij^ht of her power. This empire; was to fall to 
 ruins: ten kin^s were to risif from these ruins; after 
 them another was to come forth, and h(» was to " wear 
 out the saints of the Most Hi^di . . . until a time and 
 times and half a time " (vs. 2.S-2()). Could not our Lord 
 also interpret prophecy i lie did interpret it so far 
 as it n^aehed down to His day. Did He not know 
 that the completion of unfulfilled parts of these very 
 [)r()phecies reepiired long stretches of time? 
 
 Hut we need not argue in this a prurrl way. Our 
 Lord and the New Testament writers did know that 
 events were to intervene between their time and the 
 secon<l personal advent which made His return at any 
 moment impossible : because these events could not 
 happen in the twinkling of an eye, and must run on 
 far beyond the life of that generation. They knew 
 that Jerusalem was to be destroyed and to remain 
 " trodden down of the Gentiles until the times of the 
 Gentiles be fulfilled" (Luke 21 : 24). They knew that 
 
 
 il 
 
lil- 
 
 A MTITDY IN FSrilAToLodV. 
 
 I 
 
 ' I'' 
 
 thf loii); NOi'icN of cvrniN otiiliiuMi in Miiit. 24 iiuiHt 
 Im' C()iii|>lt't«Ml. Ni'itlH'f can wn lM'lit»vo tlwvt our l^nrd 
 WUH HO cntiri'ly i;;norant of IHh own propln-cMi'H uh 
 not to know tlwit tln'y wouM nwicli on iv^vs licyond 
 \\\H tiino. The («()N|M'l of tln! kin^^dohi wjih to Iw 
 proaclird in tlu' wlioir world ind'on' tlir end Matt. 24: 
 14). Tlu! followers of Clirist were to "make dinciples 
 of all the nations," as He was to he with them alway, 
 "even unto tluM'iid of th.' world" (Matt. 28: I!), 20) 
 tlirou;i;h the j>rt!.senc*e of tin- Spirit. 'I'hey knew that 
 the hsraelites ;;eneraily must first repent Ixifoi'e our 
 Lord woulil bo .sent fiom lieaven (Acts. 3: 19-21). 
 They knew also that Israel would not repent " until 
 the fulness of the (lentiles he come in " (liom. 1 1 : 25). 
 They knew tliat the " man of sin " nnist aris«3 and 
 run his course' until ini(|uity reaches its culmination 
 before it is "brought to nouj^ht by the nianirestation 
 of his coming ' (2 The.ss. 2 : 1-12). They knew that the 
 kingdom of heaven,, then like a musta»"d seed, in its 
 small be;;innin{^, was to ;(row until it became in con>- 
 pari.son, like a <^reat tree (Matt. 18: 31, 32). Like the 
 leaven in the meal, the kinn;dom of heav(in in the 
 world was to go on doing its work until all the world 
 was per.ncated by its teachings and power (Matt. 13: 
 33). .lolm also, in Revelation, see.s a long .succession 
 of trementlous events wliich were to take place before 
 the end. 
 
 In view of all this, can we believe our Lord and 
 New Testament writers really thought the second 
 personal advent might be inunediately impending? 
 Here is also something which is " absolutely incon- 
 

 TIIK KVF.H IMMINKNT CoMlN'rj «)K OIU l,n|u>. U.'> 
 
 NiNtcili with tlir cniistitiltioM itl* tli<> litlliiuii liiilid " ill 
 vit'W of tlh'Mi' tnriitM which tht-y knew iiuiMt hjipju'ii 
 hcl'inc H«' could conic, which thry knew iniiMt cov«'i* 
 loM'^ MtrctchcH of vciirs, if not c«'nturic.s — Htill to hcMcvo 
 He nii;^ht conic at iiiiy nionicnt, an<l he wiitcliin;^ for 
 lli.s coming hcforo the cvciitN had hiippcnud whicli 
 they ki.'nv iiiUMt precede lli.s coming'. 
 
 hut lM)th our Lord iuu\ I'niil nmke it evident that 
 they (lid not wish the early hcdievers to think the 
 Hccoiul personal advent was possibly at han<l. When 
 His disciples came to our Lord privately, saying, 
 " What shall he the si^ai of thy coiiiin;; and of tho 
 end of the world ! " (Matt. 24 : 3), our Ix)rd, evi- 
 dently fureseein<^ how liable they would be to l»e le«l 
 away by a false hope of His immediate return, warns 
 them a^^ainst it. " 'I ake heed that no man lead you 
 astray. For many shall come in my name, sayinj^, I 
 am the Clu'ist : and sliall lead many astray. And ye 
 shall hear of wars and rumors of wars : see that yo 
 be not troubled : for those tliin^js must needs come to 
 pas.s : but the end is not yet. For nation shall ri.so 
 !i;^'ainst nation. . . . But all tiiese things are tho 
 be^innin;^ of travail. . . . And many false 
 ])rophets shall arise, and sliall lead many astray. 
 . . . And this j^ospel of the kingdom shall be 
 preached in the whole worhl for a testimony unto all 
 the nations : and then shall the end come " (vs. 4-14). 
 In this discourse, instead of representing His coming 
 as indetinitely near, our Lord, by interjecting this 
 long series of events, taught tlrem in the most explicit 
 way that it was indetinitely distant. 
 10 
 
 ;i| 
 
 i ■■11 
 
 <»i 
 
 
 m 
 
U:^ 
 
 i' 
 
 146 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOGY. 
 
 Paul, also, about thirty years after our LorfrHascen- 
 .sion, gives a similar warniii*^ to the ThcHsalonians, who 
 thought the day of the Lord was present. " Let no 
 man beguile you, in any wise," he says, " for it will 
 not be except the falling away be first, and the man 
 of sin be revealed," etc. (2 Thess. 2 : 1-12). Now, 
 whether this " man of sin " be the Romish system or 
 some evil personage of tremendous power, Paul really 
 referred to what has at least not yet been completely 
 fulfilled. Are we to believe he knew so little of the 
 time re(]uired for the rise and culmination of this 
 evil power, as to think it possible for it all to take 
 place so (juickly that the Thessalonians might still 
 expect the Lord's return at any moment ? Did he 
 know so certainly the future facts and the order of 
 their occurrence, and know nothing of the time it 
 would take for them to run their course ? Paul surely 
 could not have meant to encourage any to interpret 
 his words in this way. They seem to have been occa- 
 sioned by this very misconception, and to have been 
 written to remove it. 
 
 Peter also knew he was to grow old and die, as, 
 doubtless, did all the disi^iples, from our Lord's words, 
 " But when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth 
 thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee 
 whither thou wouldst not," as is evident from John's 
 inspired comments : " Now, this he spake, signifying 
 by what manner of death he should glorify God " 
 (John 21 : 18, 19; comp. 2 Pet. 1 : 12-15). John is care- 
 ful to disabuse the minds of the people of the false 
 notion that our Lord's words, " If I will that he tarry 
 
 ■i!lif «!'^ 
 
THE EVER-IMMIXENT COMIXCJ OF OUR LOHD. 147 
 
 till I come," iinplii'd that lie wouM bu rulitsved from 
 death by the second advent (.John 21 : 22, 23). 
 
 'riiiiH, we find the time of the coming of tlie Lord 
 represented as altot^ether uncertain and indefinite. In 
 other passrft^t's it is definitely sp.>ken of as near. At 
 the same time our Lord and the writers of the New 
 Testament have knowledge of events and series of 
 events to happen before His coming, which they must 
 liave l)een aware would take long stretches of years 
 to accomplish. On the pre-millennial assumption that 
 all these references to our Lord's coming are to His 
 per.sonal second advent, the first and second forms of 
 representation .seem utterly irreconcilable. If the time 
 of the second coming is altogether indefinite, so that 
 it may not happen for ages, how could it be spoken of 
 with such un(]ualified assurance as near at hand ? 
 The knowledge of events recjuiring a great length of 
 time to happen before His advent seems equally incon- 
 sistent with either its possible or its certain nearness. 
 The problem presented is not easy in any case ; from 
 the pre-millennial point of view it is insoluble. 
 
 Rationalistic interpreters, of whom Germany sup- 
 plies the greatest number, have what they deem an 
 easy solution. They believe it to be the teaching of 
 the New Testament, not that our Lord might, but 
 that He would inmiediately return, and, consequently, 
 that apostles and people expected Him to appear 
 before the day of their death. The second class of 
 passages we have referred to, as well as those like 
 Jas. 5:7; Rev. 2 : 25 ; Luke 19 : LS ; 1 Thcss. 5 : 23; Thil. 
 1 : 9, 10; 1 Thess. 4 : 17, etc., they would explain on 
 
 l' ■ ' 
 
 1 "h ' 
 
 >\i 
 
 i 
 
 r 
 
148 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCFIATOLOnV. 
 
 ill 
 
 ; 1, .'! 
 
 tliis j^rouiKl. It is also to be reinoiiilusrod tliat tliuso 
 are the interpreters our pre-inillennial brethren oi'ten 
 (juote as lending such authority to their view. But 
 this interpretation does not help, in tlie least, to har- 
 monize the second class of passages with the first 
 noticed, or to explain how they could think our Lord 
 was inunediately to appear, when there was no sign 
 of the fultilinent of many of the predictions which 
 they knew must come to pass before He was to come. 
 It also involves us in a more serious difficulty. Our 
 Lord and New Testam^ it writers, they hold, teach 
 that the second advent .a to be in the lifetime of the 
 generation then living. But He did not then come in 
 the sense they declare He was to appear. They were, 
 therefore, false prophets. If they were in error in 
 reference to this prediction, we have no assurance 
 they were not in reference to all they made. If their 
 inspiration did not save them from error in their teach- 
 ing about the future, can we be sure that it kept them 
 from error in their doctrinal teaching ? And thus our 
 whole confidence in them as infallible teachers is in 
 danger of shipwreck. This does not trouble this 
 class of interpreters ; nay, they urge this instance of 
 what they deem false prophecy as a proof that the 
 traditional doctrine of inspiration is false, and must 
 be modified or abandoned. But our pre-millennial 
 brethren, who are staunch believers in the infallibility 
 of the scripture writings, cannot afford to accept 
 these interpreters, or this interpretation, as authori- 
 tative, when leading to a conclusion they so strongly 
 deprecate. 
 
•BH 
 
 THE EVEIMMMIXENT COMIXO OF OUR LORD. 141) 
 
 Otliers think they find help in tho tlioufrlit of the 
 progressive nature of reveUition. We hclieve aid is 
 to be found liere. but not a complete solution. In 
 the progress of revelation the antitype may succeed 
 the type, the fuller the more obscure statemcMit; the 
 more spiritual the more material form of truth, and 
 new truth may be made known. But in what per- 
 tains to a matter of fact, no progress in revelation 
 can set aside a previous prophecy and not prove it 
 false. The time of the coming miglit not be revealed 
 in the earlier revelation, and be made known in a 
 later one ; or the fact might be stated in the earlier 
 and the time left indefinite, and the definite time 
 revealed in the later. But if one time is stated in the 
 earlier, and another in the later, the later proves the 
 earlier false, if itself be true. 
 
 If, at any stage of revelation, it is taught that the 
 personal coming of the Lord is near, and it was really 
 far distant, no progress of revelation can help us 
 but a progress out of the false into the true. Again, 
 even though the time of our Lord's coming were 
 represented in the earlier as altogether indefinite, and 
 in the later as certainly near, or vice verm, we 
 get no help. In the fc^mer case the progress of reve- 
 lation has ended in what has been proved untrue, in 
 the latter case, it began in what wt's of this character. 
 But really such progress in either direction can 
 scarcely be made out in the New Testament writings. 
 In any case, the insuperable difficulty presented by 
 the fact that our Lord and New Testament writers 
 knew that events covering long stretches of years 
 
 IT 
 1". 
 
 
 , 
 
 
 ! 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 i i ; 
 i ■ 
 
 i, i 
 
 1 i 
 
150 
 
 A STUDY I\ ESCIIAToLOfJV. 
 
 b 1 
 
 11^ 
 
 muat intervene before the Hecond personal julvent, 
 would remain untouched. Pre-niillennialiHis believe 
 tluit the time of our Lord's second personal coming is 
 purposely left indefinite, in Order that all men in all 
 a«(es may have the inspiration of the thouj^lit that 
 His second advent may possibly be imminent. 
 
 Dr. Gordon declares,* " Nothing can be plainer to 
 the unprejudiced reader of the New Testament than 
 that it is the purpose of the ascended Bridegroom to 
 
 * In a(l<litioii to the quotation from Dr. Gordon, I add the fol- 
 lowing from other prominent IVe-millennialista in support of my 
 statement : 
 
 '• It has pleased (Jod to give signs or evidences of the approach of 
 these events, and by which we might know that the day was draw- 
 ing near (Heb. 10 : 2.')), but, as we have before said, they have been 
 of such a character that the Church could see them repeated in 
 each generation. And this, we believe, was purposely designed, in 
 order to give the Church ho date and no sign which might so defin- 
 itely indicate the time of her ra[)ture, that we should, in any 
 interval, cease to be vigilant. It was eviclently all planned, so that 
 the unfolding of events should be, to her, a constant incentive to 
 watchfulness."— Blackstone : "Jesus is Coming," pp. 148-9. 
 
 " The imminence of the Lord's coming consists in two things: 
 its certainty as a revealed fact, and iti uncertainty as to timo. 
 The Lord is coming, liut as to tiie time of that day and of that 
 lu»ur knoweth no man, not the angels in heaven, but my Father 
 only. < It constitutes, therefore, an overhanging, imminent event 
 always liable to occur. The object of such imminence is that we 
 may be perpetuallv looking for and waiting for the coming of the 
 Lord."— Dr. Pierson : " The Coming of the Lord," p. 53. 
 
 "It did nit please Him to reveal the time of His Son's return 
 from heaven, even to the angels, much less to men, because this 
 would have deprived the doctrine of all power except with those 
 living at the very close of the present dispensation " — ^Dr. Brookes : 
 " Maranatha," p. 353. 
 
 *' We one and all cannot do better in this matter than stand firm 
 on the vows of one of the great historical confessions. As Christ 
 would have us certainly persuaded there shall be a day of judg- 
 ment, so will He have that day unknown to men, that they may 
 shake off all carnal security, and be always watc'iful, because they 
 know not what hour the Lord will come." — Kellogg : " Pre-millen- 
 nial Essays," p. 49. 
 
 :L 
 
THK EVER-IMMINENT COMIN(J OE OUR LORD. 151 
 
 liuve His bride constantly, soberly and busily awaiting 
 I'or His return, until the appointed time of His deten- 
 tion in the heavens shall have expired. Hence ((juot- 
 in<; with approval from Archer Butler) He has har- 
 monized with consunnnate skill every part of His 
 revelation to produce this general result ; now speak- 
 ing as if a few seasons more were to herald the 
 new earth, now as if His days were thousands of 
 years: at one moment whispering into the ear of His 
 disciples, at another retreating into the depth of 
 infinite ages. It is His purpose thus to live in our 
 faith and hope, remote yet near, pledged to no 
 moment, possible at any ; worshipped not with the 
 consternation of a near^ or the indifference of a dis- 
 tant certainty, but with the anxious vigilance 
 that awaits a contingency ever at hand. Thus the 
 deep devotion of watchfulness, humility and awe, 
 He who knows us best knows to be the fittest posture 
 of our spirits ; therefore does He preserve the salutary 
 suspense that insures it, and therefore will He 
 determine His advent at no definite day in the calen- 
 dar of eternity."* 
 
 This quotation, expresses in the most beautiful and 
 the least objectionable form, the well-nigh universal 
 interpretation of the facts of the teaching of the New 
 Testament on the time of our Lord's coming, adopted 
 by Pre-millennialists. But grave objections of vari- 
 ous kinds lie against this view. It fails to account 
 for all the facts. While it recognizes all the passages 
 
 " Ecce Venit," p. 14 sq. 
 
152 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOOY. 
 
 mi 
 
 m 
 
 m 
 
 
 i 
 
 ill whicli tli»? time of the coming is left altogether 
 indefinite and uncertain, it does not explain those in 
 which the coniin*]; is positively declared to be at han<l, 
 urdess on the assumption that our Lord was justitied 
 in declaring it to be at hand for moral etf«ict, although 
 He was not sure it was near, and although, as has 
 been proved, it was not near. So, also, it does not 
 help us to reconcile the knowledge possessed by our 
 Lord and New Testament writers of the long future 
 which must intervene between His personal coming, 
 with their declarations of its possible as well as its 
 actual nearness, unless, again, they purposely gave 
 men the impression that the coming might be, or was 
 near, to present a motive for faithfulness. 
 
 If we understand the matter, this is just what Pre- 
 millennialists do believe. The language just ([uoted 
 — when stripped of the glamor of its beauty — means 
 nothing less than this. Th.cy do not contend that our 
 Lord and the New Testament writers were so ignor- 
 ant of prophecy and of the future, that they did not 
 know events must happen before the Lord's second 
 coming, which would push it forward for a long term 
 of years. It is not a question of their knowledge so 
 much as of what will be " the fittest posture of our 
 spirits." It is because " the deep devotion of 
 watchfulness, humilitj'^ and awe " are known by our 
 Lord to be the most helpful attitude of our spirits, 
 that our Lord, therefore, preserves the salutary sus- 
 pense that insures it, and, therefore, will He deter- 
 mine His advent at no definite day in the calendar of 
 eternity. It is for this reason that " at one moment 
 
THK EVEIl-IMMINEXT COMINC OF inUX LOUP. 1 ')IJ 
 
 Ho wliiHp(!r.s into the car of His (lisciplc, at anotlicr 
 rctivuts into tliu depth of intinite a^cs." 
 
 Stripped of all uniu'cessary vcrhia^c ami ox})n'SKL'(l 
 in tlu! plainest way, this means that our Lord, 
 aItlioii<;h knowin;^ His personal coniin;jj could not be 
 until lon^ after the men of His own ;^'«'neration were 
 dead, nevertheless spoke to them and inspired others 
 to speak to them, so as to lead thorn to suppose 
 His advent mi<^ht occur before their death; and, 
 a^'ain, as if it certainly was ni^h at hand. His rea- 
 son for this was in order that this salutary attitude 
 of watchfulness mi<^ht be maintained, not only in the 
 men of the first generation, but also in those of all 
 j^n>nerations, until He really should come. Souie of 
 the best of men, it is true, Imve held this view; but 
 it appears to us they could not have had in mind all 
 the facts of the case, or they could not have suth- 
 ciontly considered the necessary implications of their 
 theory. Can we on this ground possibly escape the 
 shocking conclusion that our Lord encouraged the 
 men of His own generation, at least, to hope for what 
 Ho knew would prove an illusion, in order to promote 
 their faithfulness ^ If we can believe this of our 
 Lord, can we longer express abhorrence of the Jesuit 
 rule of action, that the end justifies the means ? Even 
 if it be said that our Lord was so ignorant (jf the 
 future that He really thought He might come before 
 the death of some of the men of that generation : the 
 Father knew, and we must suppose He would plan to 
 make a hope which He knew would be an illusion to 
 the people of scores and perhaps hundreds of genera- 
 
154 
 
 A STI'DY IS E.SCHAT()I-(HJY. 
 
 m 
 
 ■■:)( 
 
 1 
 
 tioim, tlio ^n'aiul iiiotiv*; of Cliri.Mti.iii ruitlifuliicHH. Do 
 W(! not tlms iinpu;;ii His trutlil'uliHj.sH, vvln'ii we sup- 
 poHo Ho would arniiif^e to doludo inyriiidH uiul inyri- 
 ad.s with a h()[)(3 He kiu'vv muHt provo false:' Do 
 we not tlius impu;;ii His all-sntlicieiicy l)y iinj)lyiii;^ 
 that His rcsourccH are so limitcfl that He will clioose 
 to depend for what Pre-niilleniiialiHtH believe the one 
 great motive power to C'liristian faithfulnesa and 
 activity, upon an expectation which, for nearly two 
 thousand years of living and dying generations would 
 never be realized i Neither is tliis all : we must sup- 
 pose all things to be so adjusted that the supreme 
 motive to faithfulness would be conditioned upon 
 ignorance rather than knowledge. To have an under- 
 standing of the prophecies which had to be filled 
 before our Lord would come, would be to make it 
 impossible to be under the dominance of this stand- 
 ing and grandest motive for all the (christian ages. 
 For the contemporaries of our Lord, for instance, to 
 know that Jerusalem must be destroyed, must be 
 trodden down of the Gentiles until the times of the 
 Gentiles be fulfilled, that the Jews must repent before 
 our Lord could break through the heavens which 
 shut Him from their sight, and that thev would not 
 repent and be saved until the fulness of the Gentiles 
 be come in — to know all this and more which is 
 declared in the New Testament, not to mention the 
 prophecies of the Old Testament — would remove not 
 only tlie men of the first Christian age from the 
 power of this grand motive, but those of all others 
 until this day. Only those could feel its power, who 
 
 A 
 
TIIK KVKK-IMMI\'K\T co.MINti (>K OUIl LOIU). 155 
 
 rithor shut tlirir eyes to tlu'so propliticioH, or wlio 
 couM not |)(!i-t'()iin tlu! I'oat of t>x|H>c'tii»;; tlu' Lord's 
 comin;^ us j)osMiltl»' liet'oro tlio ovi^iiiii*; of cacli day, 
 whilo thry knew many of tlicso cvcntH to Ix; rultilK'(l 
 hofon* \\v could coiiio — cvouts wliich, by tlu'ir wry 
 nature, must oc'cuj)y ;;rcat Ifii^tlis of yoars — j^avc no 
 si;;n of occurring. 
 
 Reply is made to this (>l)jcc'tion, Iiowever. It is 
 said tlicro is no inconsistency in God's usin<^ tlic nn- 
 certain.y as to tlie titno of our death to promote 
 watcid'uhiess and faithfuhiess, altliough He may 
 know that years are to ehipse before tlie dying day. 
 Wliy, then, it is urged, need we deem it out of har- 
 mony with God's veracity, if He use the uncertainty 
 as to the time of the Lord's coming for tlie same pur- 
 p(3se ? The ditHcuIty, it is said, is no greater in one 
 case than in the otlier. 
 
 J>ut the cases are not parallel. The time of a num's 
 death is necessarily uncertain. It would re([uire a 
 special revelation in each man's case to make it 
 known, involving continuous miracle. It is alleged 
 that the time of Christ's coming is purposely left or 
 made uncertain, in order that what was known would 
 ]irove an illusion might be used for moral stimulus. 
 The length of human life is also so brief that death is 
 not only possible but really near to all. 
 
 It does not re(juire us to think as possibly near an 
 event which would happen only after scores and per- 
 haps hundreds of generations had come and gone. In 
 the one case. God uses fur moral stinuilus an event 
 which is necessarily uncertain, and which is near and 
 
 u m 
 
 
! I 
 
 ||i|;| 
 
 i 
 
 n 
 
 ill 
 
 mi 
 
 |lit 
 
 I 
 
 
 l.-)!! 
 
 A SllhV I\ KS<MAT()I.(MJV. 
 
 to hjip|M»n ill tho lifi^tiino of all. In i\w nthor, Wo. 
 piirpoHcIy inakoH to appear U!ic<M'taiii. wlicii a word 
 could have iiindt; it known to all men, an rvont which 
 ll(» knew would not happen for lou;^ 'IJ^('h, >»> order 
 that He nii;^dit use the illusory iinpreHsion thus j^iven 
 of its poHsihlc nearnt'HH for moral eHTi'ct. 'I'he ditf'er- 
 cnee between the two caweH is one of nature as well as 
 one of de;(ree. 
 
 It would appear, tlierefon', that the pre-milleimial 
 interpn^tation of the various forms in which the 
 comin;^ of the I^ord is ref»'rred to in the New Testa- 
 ment, involves ditKculties, at almost every step, which 
 are simply insuperahle. To maintain that all the 
 references to our Lord's comin;^ are to His personal 
 appearing, and that all the expressioius which exhort 
 to watchfulness, fidelity, etc., in view of His comin<;, 
 are conditione<l upon the possible inuuinence of His 
 personal coming, is to make it impossihh^ either to 
 prevent difi'erent passages from contradicting each 
 other, or to interpret them in harmony with the 
 veracity of (Jod. No attempt has been made to create 
 needless difficulty, only an honest effort to make 
 manifest the real difficulties which invest this whole 
 subject, on pre-millennial assumptions, when we come 
 to give to the Scriptures which relate to it anything 
 like a searching examination. 
 
 Recently a class of Pre-millennialists have become 
 convinced of the utter impossibility of continuing to 
 believe that our Lord may come at any moment, while 
 they acknowledge it to be the teaching of Scripture 
 that He cannot come before the Jews are converted, 
 
TIfE KVKIl IMMIVKN'T ro.>nS<J OK ulK l.nUI) l.")7 
 
 th(> (j!t>M|H'l prciU'liitl in till iiHtinii.s, tlio muii of mIm 
 revealiHl, ami \vhil«! a mimlM'r ol' otlirr proplu'cirs 
 niuaiii to be ruirillcii. Much k'ss. thvy tVel, could 
 tlu;He two ])o.sitionM liavo bcoii iiitclli^^t'ntly lu'M 
 toir»'th('r Iroiii tlio liouimiiiii' ol* tln> Cliristiaii era. 
 Tlu'y Hc*' tlii.s \v<)»iM mean tlwit llf iiii;;lit coiiu' bt't'oro 
 lie could come, and is a direct contradiction in terniM. 
 Tlic vvondtT is tliat any could believe our Lord would 
 not return, Tor instance, until tlu' .b'W.s were con- 
 verted, and Htill c«)uld expect C/liri.st nii;;ht come 
 wiiile the Jt^w.s remain impenitent. Hut many, even 
 to-day, hold these incompatil)le beliefs. 
 
 The new tlieory to uieet tl»i8 ditliculty, ami still 
 save the pre-millennial view, is the following: 
 
 Our Lord is to come for His peopl(^ in the air. The 
 ri^diteous dead and the livin<; who are His, are to be 
 caught up, in their resurrection bodies, to meet Him 
 there. He does not then descend to the earth, but 
 remains with them in the air, or, as some say, returns 
 with them to heaven. During this time, they receive 
 their judgment. In the meantinus on the earth, there 
 is the great tribulation, during whicli Israel will be 
 restored to Ids own land and converted ; antichrist 
 will be revealed ; the vials of God's wrath will be 
 poured out ; and then our Lord will come with His 
 people, to judge the nations and to begin His millen- 
 nial reign. Those who hold this theory say that 
 Christ may come for His people, which they term the 
 " Rapture of the saints," at any moment ; it is only 
 His coming with His people, which they call the 
 
 
 : ■' >' 
 
 1:!il 
 
 ; f 
 
 '! I' 
 
J 
 
 y I 
 
 i|it «'' 
 
 V 
 
 158 
 
 A HTUDY \S KHCiiAToLrxiY. 
 
 " U«'V«'l«iti«)ii," which cimiiot ocnir until cMTlHin pro- 
 pliecicH urc rulfillrti. 
 
 The (|ui»«t HMMuninco with which this ih'W ihtM)ry Ih 
 put forwiinl, is .simply jiHtnundiii;;, in view of* all it 
 iiivolvcH, and of the evidence uii^i'd in its I'jivor. 
 Notice HoiiH'thin;,' ol* what is involved in it : 
 Thei'e art^ to l)e tw») personai t'oniin;^H ol' our Lord, 
 •eparated hy a period of years pre^^nant with the 
 •grandest ('vents. Not oidy will then* he two n^sur- 
 rectioiiH, one of the ri^diteoiis and another of tlu^ 
 wieked, with those who live durin;:; the niilleiniiuin 
 to be accounted for, which tin; general pre-inillennial 
 view niakeH neces.sary ; hut there wmII he three rcHur- 
 rectiouH or more. The ri«rhteouH dead ^.jentsrally rine 
 in the "rapture," at His tir.st second cominj^ for His 
 people. The trihulation saints who die between the 
 first and the second second comin<r, lise when Wo comes 
 this second time with His saints. To correspond with 
 this, we suppose there nnist he thre(^ jud^Muents, if 
 these tribulation saints ai'o not nuide exceptions, and 
 have no jud«jfment ; and still no provision is made for 
 those who live during tlie millennium. " The day of 
 judgment" is made to stretch, not only from the 
 beginnin<^ of the millennium to beyond its clos*', but 
 bej^ins (juite a time before the thousand years. Tlie 
 last day, also, since it is made to include the resurrec- 
 tion of the righteous at its beginninj^ (John G : 39, 
 40,44; 11 : 24), and the judtjment of the wicked at 
 its close (John 1 2 : 4><), must extend over the same great 
 length of years. Now, all Pre millennialists regard the 
 age to come as the millennial period, as distinguished 
 
THE EVKIi-IMMINKNT COMINd OF OUli LolU). ir>l> 
 
 IVmiii ilip ii^<<H to coiiK* (Kph. 2 : 7), and ilir ItiHt ^\ny 
 they ln'lirvr witli um to Im tin; lust < lay of tin* pn-MPiit 
 ^oM|M'l ji;^o or <liMjM'iiHjitioM. Wliili! tho j^rmMJiI pro- 
 iniilt'iiiiial theory thus ext(>iiilM the hist <hiy of thiH 
 tt^u HO UH to inchnh' the whole ii;;e to conu', thin 
 Hpcciiil view iiiakeM the hist (hiy of thin n^t' ho loii;^ 
 that it not only covers all tht- a;;e whieh is to follow, 
 hut also takes in a considt-rahh' |)ortion of the closing; 
 part of tlu' present ap;. 
 
 Tln'y assiune, surriy, that th«' scripturr writers 
 hail a stran^^e sens(^ of jiropricty in the use of lan- 
 j^uaj^e, when they use the term last day of one a«;e, 
 apparently, in order to nuuk, sharply, the division 
 line between this a»re an<l the next an<l to contrast 
 a short with a lon;^ perio<l, as aetually inclu<lin^ th«' 
 jM'riod r«'i)resent»'d hy the U^rm deserihinj; tlu' unspeak- 
 ably lon<''er tinw, with considcraMe to spare. They 
 also wcnilcl have us belic^ve, that while the New T«'sttt- 
 iiicnl writers thou<^ht the last day of this ii<rii was ho 
 iinnuiuse, they believe the a;^e itself, of which this 
 was to be the last day, niij^ht l)e less than the life- 
 • time of their own generation. Rather a stranijjc con- 
 ception of the relative len«(tha of an a^e and its lawt 
 day, one would think ! 
 
 lUjt what are tlie scripture evidences u})on which 
 <le[u;ndence is placed, to establish this theory of two 
 second connngs of our Lord ;" Let us examine them 
 as given by W. E. Blackstone in his book, " Jesus Ih 
 Comin*:;," which is commended in over three pages of 
 enthusiastic testimonials from Pre-millennialists, and 
 whose chart of events was publicly endorsed by 
 
 1 
 
 ; If 
 
 II 
 
 :;i 
 
 it'- 
 
 11^ 
 
n 
 
 IGO 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOF-OOY. 
 
 m i 
 
 
 
 the clwiinnan of one ol' tlioir coiii'eroncoH as repro- 
 Hciiliii;^ the virvvH of tliat body. It in significant tliat, 
 of this view, tlie reverent .stiKlents of tlie Bible for 
 eighteen centuries found nothin<^. It is a discovery, 
 so far as we can learn, of sonu; brethren in this (genera- 
 tion. It is also noticeabh;, that it was discovered to 
 meet what seemed an insuperable difHculty in the 
 aspect of the pre-niillennial view, which is regarded 
 by its supporters as giving to it its chief, if not its 
 whole, importance. This may not necessarily be an 
 objection to the view itself ; for difficulties often lead 
 to new views made necessary for their solution. 
 
 It does, however, suggest the need of the greatest 
 caution, and makes it imperative to have very clear 
 evidence before we accept the theory which is so 
 opportunely discovered to relieve a cherished belief of 
 one of its greatest difficulties. 
 
 Mr. Blackstone says: "The rupture occurs when 
 the church is caught up to meet Christ in the air (1 
 Thess. 4: 15-17) before the tribulation: and the rev- 
 elation occurs when Christ comes, with His saints, to 
 end the tribulation by the execution of righteous 
 judgment upon the earth (2 Thess. 1 : 7-10 ; Jude 14, 
 15). At the rapture, Christ comes for His saints 
 (John 14 : 3). At the revelation, He comes with 
 them (1 Thess. 3 : 13 ; Jude 14 ; Zech. 14 : 5)." 
 
 Of course, the reader will see that there is not a 
 particle of proof in all these passages, allowing them 
 all to refer to Christ's second and personal coming, 
 that a period including the great tribulation comes 
 between the assumed comings for, and with, His 
 
 
THE EVEIl-lMMINENT (OMINU <)F OUR LORD. 10 1 
 
 •et- 
 to 
 
 JOUS 
 
 14, 
 
 nts 
 ith 
 
 people. If tl>oy were cau«^lit up to meet Him, and 
 accompanied Him immediately to the earth, every 
 demainl i\)r honest interj)retation would bu met. 
 
 But now for Mr. B.'s argument. 
 
 " He certainly must come for them before He can 
 come with them. The assurance that God will bring 
 them (Greek : lead them forth) with Jesus (I Thess. 4 : 
 14) is evidence that He will first come for tliem, they 
 beini; cau<ifht up to meet Him in the air (v. 17). The 
 Greek now here rendered ' to meet ' signified a (jo'uxj 
 forth in order torctiirn with. The same now is used 
 in Acts 28: 1'), where the brethren came out to meet 
 Paul, and liad a season of thanksgiving with him at 
 Appii Foruni and the Three Taverns, when on his way 
 to Rome. This exactly accords with our being caught 
 up to meet Christ and afterwards returning to the 
 earth with Him." 
 
 Two arguments, if we may call them such, are here 
 given. The first is mere words. Christ must come 
 for, before He can come with. His people. This only 
 means that they must meet Him before they can ac- 
 company Him to the earth. But what strength has 
 it to show that the calling of them up to meet Him 
 and their descent with Him are two distinct occur- 
 rences, involving two separate comings of our Lord ? 
 His second argument, from the parallel case of the 
 use of the word aTtavTsai;, to meet, is most unfortu- 
 nate for him ; because those who met Paul, met him 
 on his journey to Rome and immediately accompanied 
 him back. Who would argue from the use of this 
 word that the one met was required to stop a long 
 11 
 
 : ■; i ■ 
 
 i.j 
 
162 
 
 A STl^DY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 
 I -'a 
 
 'ij 
 
 time bofon; coiitinuinn; lii.s journoy, or to ^o luick 
 whence he came, and return with tlieni only after an 
 indefinite period ^ Tlie fact is that in tlie otlier in- 
 stances of tlie use of this expression {€i> dfTrayTeffi?:) 
 in the New Testament (Matt. 25 : 1-G ; Acts 28 : 15), it 
 is to meet and immediately to return with the one 
 met, as he continues on to liis destination. 
 
 But let us examine the passages dependeil upon a 
 little more closely. We are asked to believe that our 
 Lord's coming, referred to in 1 Thess. 4:14, " If we 
 believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them 
 also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring 
 with him," is subseijuent, by an indefinite and fateful 
 period, to the coming Paul immediately proceeds to 
 speak of in vs. 15-17 : " For this we say unto you by 
 the word of the Lord, that we that are alive, that are 
 left unto tlie coming of the Lord," etc. The former 
 is the revelation, which is not to take place until long 
 after the latter, which is the rapture.* 
 
 But who that notices the way in which these verses 
 are articulated together into an indivisible whole, 
 
 *It is also more than doubtful whether this verse refers at all to 
 the return of the saints in tlieir resuirection bodies with tlie I^ord. 
 The teaching seems to be that as our Lord died and rose again, so 
 shall (iod bring those who are fallen asleep in Jesus with Him from 
 the dead. Or, it may mean, that (Jod will bring with Jesus the 
 spirits of those who have fallen asleep (as to their bodies) when He 
 descends to raise their bodies from the dead (comp. 2 Cor. 4 : 14). 
 This is the interpretation of Jos. Smith, in his " The Coming 
 King," p. 52. Mr. Smith is an ardent Pre-millennialist. The "ten 
 thousand of his holy ones," in Jude 14, are the amjeU, not the re- 
 deemed. These two passages upon which such a doctrine depends 
 for its direct scripture basis, when rightly interpreted, have no 
 reference to the question at issue, and if they had, would not give 
 it any countenance. 
 
THE EVER-IMMINENT COMING OF OUR LORD. 103 
 
 the 
 en He 
 
 U). 
 oming 
 "ten 
 he re- 
 pends 
 ive no 
 t give 
 
 can heliove this? Notice that Paul, in his Second 
 Kpistle to tlie ThessalonianH, corrects some nuHappre- 
 hensionn of the peoph;, as to liis former teaching. In 
 cliapter 2:1-9, he says : " Now we beseech you, hretli- 
 ren, toucliin<; tlie coming of our Lord Jesus (.'hrist, 
 and our gathtsring tot^ether unto him ; to the end that 
 ye be not (piickly shaken from your mind, nor yet be 
 troubled, either by spirit or by word, or by epistle as 
 from us, as that the day of the Lord is now present ; 
 let no man be<;uile you in any wise : for if (rill not Ixt 
 except the falling away come first, and the man of sin 
 be revealed," etc. Paul here disabuses the minds of 
 the Thessalonians of a false impression as to the time 
 of our Lord's coming. He declares it impossible for 
 Him to come for an indefinite time in the future, 
 instead of assuming He might come at any moment, 
 as the pre-millennial view reciuires, and as they inter- 
 pret 1 Thess, 4: 15-19 to mean. To Mr. Hlackstone 
 and those that follow him, this is thought to present 
 no difficulty. It is only necessary to refer 1 Thess. 
 4: 15-19 to the rapture and 2 Thess. 2:1-9 to the 
 revelation. They do not seem to notice the arrant 
 nonsense they make of Paul's reasoning. It is not 
 " Do not be troubled : for the coming I spoke of in my 
 first letter is not present, as you suppose. An indefi- 
 nite time must elapse before that coming will be upon 
 you." But it is made to be : " The coming I spoke to 
 you about in my first letter may, indeed, happen at 
 any moment ; but do not be shaken from your mind ; 
 because there is another coming than the one I then 
 spoke of, which is not to be present for a longtime to 
 
 Utl 
 
 V 
 
164 
 
 A STLM)Y IN ESCIIATOLOOY. 
 
 «■ ! 
 
 |li; 
 
 ■1 
 
 m 
 
 come." If anythiiii^ is plain, uiilesH wo wish to impute 
 folly to an inspired man, it is that Paul, in his second 
 letter, is referring to the same coming as in the first, 
 and that tliis theory of two second comings of our 
 Lord is a figment of the imagination rather than the 
 teaching of these passages which are supposed to give 
 it its chief support. And yet, Mr. Blackstone takes 
 " most commentators " to task, because they do not 
 accept sucli an interpretation as this ! 
 
 Another argument for the distinction between the 
 time of tlie rapture and of the revelation is one of 
 the many specimens, in his book, of curiosities of 
 interpretation. 
 
 For the statement, " At the rapture the c]iurcli,like 
 Enoch, is taken out of the world," he gives as proof 
 Acts 15 : 14, where it is expressly declared that " God 
 did visit the Gentiles to take out of thnn a people for 
 his name," referring to the conversion of Cornelius 
 and his household and the reception of the Gentiles 
 generally to the privileges of the Gospel. It does iKot 
 make the remotest allusion to Christ's coming, at 
 some future time, to take His people from the earth. 
 For the suppleme*tary statement, "At the revela- 
 tion, the millennial kingdom is begun," he gives Acts 
 15: 15, 16, wherein the reception of the Gentiles to 
 the privileges of the Gospel, by Peter and Paul, is 
 declared by James to fulfil a prophecy from Amos, 
 which he quotes. 
 
 This much for the proof of the distinct comings 
 at the so-called rapture and revelation. Now for the 
 proof that the tribulation comes between. In Luke 
 
THE EVEIMMMINENT COMING OF OlTll Loill). 105 
 
 21: 28, tlio rupture i.s referred to at tin; bej^nnniiif^ 
 of tlie tribulation. " w/ion these tliini^s hnjlu to come 
 to pans, then look up and hft up your liead.s : for your 
 redemption drawetli ni^h " (redemption here meaning 
 tlie first resurrection, the sanu; as in Rom. 8 : 23). 
 
 In Luke 21 :3l the revelation is referred to " wlien 
 these things (the tribulation) liave come to pass and 
 tlie kin(j<lom of God dravveth niirh." 
 
 But Mr. B. had just asserted, on the previous pa<je, 
 that the rapture conies " before the trilmlation." 
 Here he says that after tlie tribulation befifins tlie 
 rapture is only drawing nigh. How can the rapture 
 both precede and happen during tlie course of the 
 tribulation ? Besides, he should have read the pre- 
 ceding verse (27), "And then (at the close of the 
 tribulation) shall they see the Son of man coming in 
 a cloud," etc. It is manifestly in view of this coming 
 at the close of the tribulation, and not of an imagin- 
 ary one at its beginning, that our Lord told them to 
 " look up . . • for their redemption was drawing 
 nigh." A small knowledge of Greek would prevent 
 anyone from building an argument upon the word 
 " begin " as given in the translation of this passage. 
 The more accurate translation of Luke 21 : 31, "coming 
 to pass," has left no semblance of an argument such 
 as Mr. B. has given. But why w^aste space ? Our 
 Lord, in vs. 29-32, is but illustrating by a figure the 
 time of the coming He has been speaking of in the 
 preceding verses. These things there spoken of should 
 be related to His coming, just as the putting forth of 
 the shoots on the fig trees was to the summer. To 
 
 'ill' 
 
 1 . c. 
 
m >!< 
 
 IGO 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOT.OGY. 
 
 It 'I 
 
 make the direct statements of our Lord in vs. 24-28 
 refer to another comin<^ than the one which is spoken 
 of in the figurative aUusion to tliis same coming, is, of 
 course, out of tlie question. 
 
 He also urges as an argument for the rapture as 
 distinct from the revelation, that the Church is to 
 escape the tribulation which precedes the revelation. 
 Two passages are given in proof — Luke 2 1 : 36 ; liev. 3: 
 10. Luke 21 : 3G reads, in the Revised Veision : " I)ut 
 watch ye at every season, making supplication, that 
 ye may prevail to escape all these things that shall 
 come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man." 
 What are the " all things " which they are to strive 
 to escape ? They are certainly what is mentioned in 
 V. 34 ; whether they include anything else or not, is 
 doubtful. They are then, to watch, etc, that they 
 might prevail to escape from having their hearts 
 " overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness, and 
 cares of this life." Now, prevailing to escape from 
 sins and the spirit of this world does not mean neces- 
 sarily, or even naturally, to be taken away from the 
 world and its temptations altogether. It is by escap- 
 ing from evil in this higher way that men are able to 
 " stand before the Son of man," in the consciousness 
 of right, as the word implies — when He comes. So 
 far as Rev. 3 : 10 is concerned — " Because thou didst 
 keep the word of my patience, I also will keep thee 
 from the hour of trial, that hour which is to come 
 upon the whole world, to try them that dwell upon 
 the earth" — it was spoken to the church at Phila- 
 delphia. That church has long ceased to exist, and its 
 
 jf 
 
TIIK EVEH-IMMINKNT COMING OK OIU I.ORI). 1(17 
 
 mcmhei'H have long been lying in tlieir graves. None 
 ol' them were to live to the great tribulation which 
 pre-niillennial interpreters of Matt. 24 and Luke 21 
 make a period yet future. It must be a promise then, 
 to this speciHed church, of deliverance from an liour 
 of trial which was soon to come upon its living mem- 
 l»ers. Whether tliis foreshadows a greater deliverance 
 of the whole church from a future tribulation is 
 uncertain. If it does, surely, as the deliverance to the 
 riiiladelphia church \\as a deliverance by helping 
 them through and out from (f«). rather than away 
 from, the trials, any deliverance this foreshadows need 
 not be through keeping the church away from, rather 
 than through the midst of, and so out of, the coming 
 trials. 
 
 Thus we have followed Mr. Blackstone in all his 
 treatment so far as it is not mere assertion. A few 
 words more on this theory may be added. 
 
 It is assumed that the revelation of our Lord is 
 His coming with His people a long time after He 
 comes to raise them from the dead. It is also after 
 tliey have received their judgment and have their 
 rewards apportioned to them. It is also after the 
 " marriage of the Lamb." They are judged, and the 
 marriage of the Lamb occurs, while they are in the 
 air with their Lord. Let us see how all this agrees 
 with the use of the word (a7roHa\vf/'i>) which Pre- 
 millennialists allege is used to describe this coming of 
 the Lord with His people, after all these things have 
 taken place. 
 
 " So thac ye come behind in no gift ; waiting for 
 
 . I' 
 
168 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 M* 
 
 I I 
 1, 1 
 
 \ . 
 
 II 
 
 r 
 
 tlic revelation of our Lord Jcsuh (yhrist ; who Hhall 
 also conHnn you unto the end, fhnt ye he unro- 
 proveabh^ in the (hiy of our Lord Jesus Christ" 
 (1 Cor. 1: 7,8). 
 
 If the revehition is not until after they have met 
 their Lord, aiul the niarriaj^e of tlie Lamb and tlieir 
 judgment with tlie apportionin<; of its rewards are all 
 past, then the eyes of the Corinthians, during their 
 waiting, must have overlooked the very coming which 
 our pre-millennial brethren think tlie chief object of 
 expectation. They were waiting for the coming which 
 was more distinct, and not the one which might bo 
 just at hand. Also, their being " unreproveable in the 
 day of Jesus Christ," evidently referring to the judg- 
 ment, was to be before His revelation for which they 
 were waiting, and not at the revelation, us the apostle 
 declares. 
 
 " That the proof of your faith, being more precious 
 than gold that perisheth, though it is proved by fire, 
 might be found unto praise and glory and honor at 
 the revelation of Jesus Christ" (1 Pet. 1 : 7). 
 
 Did Peter mean that their faith was not to be found, 
 " unto praise " until after the first coming, when they 
 were to be judged and their rewards assigned ? 
 
 " Wherefore girding up the loins of your mind, . . • 
 set your hope perfectly on the grace that is to be 
 brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ " 
 (I Pet. 1:13). 
 
 Did Peter think the bestowment of this grace would 
 be deferred until long after they were raised from the 
 dead and had met their Lord in personal presence ? 
 
TIIK KVKIl-IMMINKNT CUMIN*; OV (Ull I.OUD. 101) 
 
 bo 
 
 "'I'o yo»i that are atHictcil rest with us, at the 
 revelation of the lionl Johuh from heaven," etc. 
 (2TlieHa. 1:7). 
 
 Were tlie TlieHsaloiiian believers not to have rest 
 witli their Lord when Me hIiouM come to raise them 
 from tlie tlea«l and take them to hiniHelf ? They 
 really are not said to liave rest, if the revelation is a 
 later coming, even at the marriaj^c supper of the 
 Lamb. 
 
 Besi<les, all these passa<^es are taken as proof that 
 Paul an<l Peter thou^^ht the comin«^ of the Lord so 
 near that tliose they addressed would pi'obably live to 
 see it. And yet we are to believe a word is used to 
 describe it, which refers to another cominf(alto;(ether, 
 which was not to happen until after a terriKc time of 
 tribuhition.and after the comin<j which really mi^ht be 
 near, was past ! 
 
 So of the other noun most frefjuently used to de- 
 scribe the second coming. This word {napoi^aun) means 
 " a being beside " or " presence." Now, we should ex- 
 pect this word " presence " or " being beside one, or 
 where one is," would certainly not be used of a coming 
 which is merely a nearer approach, antl which stops 
 short before He gets in sight of men at all. And yet 
 it is this very word translated " presence," in the more 
 accurate rendering in the margin of the Revised Ver- 
 sion, which is used of this, as is claimed, approach of 
 our Lord, wherein He does not come in personal 
 presence to the earth at all. 
 
 We cannot pause to refer to other classes of pas- 
 sages in which this theory breaks down. We hope 
 
 ■ft"' H 
 %■■■ 
 
170 
 
 A STUDV IN KSCIIATOhOUV. 
 
 
 
 I I 
 
 ihiH exHiiiiiuition i.s.sutlicioiit to mIiow that ull mIIc^imI 
 jn'oof of tliin theory must ho roiul in, Ix't'oic it cun 
 he (hawii out. 'I'here is not only notliiuj^ to favor it, 
 hut it iH in the most direct eoiitliet with many pas- 
 Ha;;es of tilt! Word of (Jod. The ordinary readin;^ of 
 the N(!\v Testament and its mow critical studv alike, 
 when there is no theory to su|)port, tind no inchcalion 
 that its autliors had the remotest conception of two 
 personal cominj^s of our Lord, s!'parat«'d by a space 
 between sufficient toliold all prophecy whicli remained 
 to be fulfilled before His revelation with the angels 
 of His power. A study of all the passa^^es referring 
 to our Lord's second personal coming makes it plain 
 tliat it was to them a single, decisive, tremendous event, 
 and not two separate ones. They speak of it always 
 in the singular. 'I'hey speak of the personal coming 
 they refer to in every definite case as tlie one personal 
 coming of which there is no other. 
 
 Certain other exigencies of this theory, which we 
 cannot take space to explain, make it necessary that 
 this so-called " Rapture of the saints " at Clirist's 
 coming for His people shouhl be secret. Secret it is, 
 therefore, held to be by tlie most of those adopting 
 this special view. It is, tlierefore, necessary to explain 
 away 1 (\ir. 15 : 'y'l : " We shall not all sleep, but we 
 shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling 
 of an eye, at the last trump ; for the trumpet shall 
 sound, and the dead shall be raised," and 1 Tliess. 4:10: 
 " For tlie Lord himself shall descend from heaven 
 with a shout, with tlie voice of the archangel and 
 with the trump of God, and the dead iu Christ ahall 
 
THK EVKKI.MMINFNT COMlN(J OF Olll l.olll). 171 
 
 ns«," etc. Ah it Ih impossible (o refer these pjissa;;eH 
 to iuiytliitij^' «'1m(> tliaii tiie eoiitin;; of tltf Lonl to raise 
 tile (lead and take liis |)«'u[>li' to Iiiiiisrif, they declare 
 the '* shout, " the " voice ol" the archaiii^cl ' and thf 
 " sounding; tiiimp " an* heard oidy by the ri^ht«'oUH I 
 Hut this is not al!. Matt. 24 : 27, " For, as the li^dit- 
 uiii^ Cometh forth from thr cast, and is seen (!Ven unto 
 the west, so shall be theeomin<^of tiu?Sonof man," and 
 Acts 1:11, " This .Jesus which was n'C<;iv(d up from 
 you into heaven, shall no come in like manner as ye 
 bcsheld him ^<)in;j into heaven," cannot refer at all to 
 the comin«; of the Lord which was first to follow 
 His ascension ; for that is to be secret and invisible, 
 whereas this con)inj^ is in a visible blaze of glory. 
 It cannot refer to that comin«^ which is of chief 
 interest to believers, as our pre-millennial brethren 
 themselves suppose ; it is of a second second coming 
 or a third advent, when lie returns after having taken 
 liis people to himself! This second coming of our 
 r.jrd for His people as distinguished from His glorious 
 c( ming with them, is a figment of the imagination, 
 not a teaching of the New Testament. 
 
 Finally, the Scriptures teach it is upon the wicked 
 the coming of the Lord is to be an awful surprise. 
 Now, the alleged coming for the saints is said to be 
 unknown to them, except as they wake up .some 
 morning and find all the righteous gone. It is the 
 coming with the saints, which is placed seven years 
 after the rapture, which is to come with its terrible 
 unexpectedness upon this class. Not only do they 
 hold that the time between these comings is known, 
 
172 
 
 A HTIJDY IN KSCIIATOLOijy. 
 
 but also tlu' jlrfinito HerioH of «»v<»ntH wljirli will rhipBt' 
 then. Am<1 y«*t, iti faco of all this, tli«> rcvfiatioii of 
 our Lonl will surpri.s*' all (ho wick«'<l ' Nay, it' tliore 
 were Mucli i\ rnptnrr of the saints at a coming at this 
 nliort ptu'iod previou.sly, it \h iiiiposHihlu to iiiKlcr.staiKi 
 how all tln' wicked could Ix' thus Huipris»'(|. 
 
 So far a.s wo havr gotio, the problem of tin* trachin;; 
 of Scripture a.s to our Lord'H Hccond coniiu^ remaiim 
 uuHolved. 'I'hi.s theory would not solve it, if it could 
 Iw acccpte<I, and it cainiot he accepted even thouj^h it 
 would. 
 
 'Il'^'l 
 
TIIK ; VKK-I.MMINKNT COMINll OK OIH I.OHh. 17IJ 
 
 CIIAI^IHR X. 
 
 TIIK KVKIMMMINKNT COMINdl OF OIK LORD. 
 
 K\ KUV Olio wlio lias jrivcii mufh stiuly to the pa.s- 
 siiifi'H rofrir'm^ to the coining; of the Lord will nwulily 
 luliiiit tluit tlio Huhjrct is one of „reat (jitriculty. It 
 i.s much easier to critiei.se explanatiotiM that have Ix'on 
 (tflenMl thati to put foiwani one that is hctter. It is 
 (louiiti'ul if any throry will ever he prcsruted which 
 will he pcrft'ctly satisfactory, \V»' hrlicve, hovvever, 
 that an explanation can be ^iven which is not liable 
 to th(! insuperable objections to wiiicli thoae we have 
 been discussing are exposed. 
 
 We do not believe tlie first step can be nuule to- 
 ward a solution of tlie ditficulties envclopinf^ this 
 subject, as lonj; as all references to the comini^ of the 
 Lord are ref^arded as alludinj^ indiscriminately and 
 exclusively to His personal advent. If they all spoke 
 of the coniinf( as only po.ssibly near, still there would 
 be the impossibility of reconciling^ such statements 
 with their evident knovvledj^e of future events whicli 
 must happen before His coming. But, as we have 
 seen, there are numerous pa.ssages which spwik of His 
 
 ' n 
 
174 
 
 A STUDY IN ESOriATOLOOY. 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 ■•J 
 
 coming not only as possibly near, but as certainly 
 n(3ai-. Thoro aro also otlicrs which, if they teach any- 
 thing about the nearness of our Lord's advent, and 
 thus support the pre-niillennial conception, take for 
 granted that He will appear before those; who were 
 aliv(; when the New Testament was written, have 
 passed away : " We that are alive, that are left unto 
 the couiing of the Lord " ( 1 Thess. 4 : 1')) ; " That thou 
 keep the comniandnient , . . until the appearing of 
 our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Tim. 0:14): "Be patient, 
 therefore, brethren, unto the coining of the Loi'd " (Jas. 
 5 : 7): " That ye may be sincere and void of offence unto 
 the day of Christ" (Phil. 1 : 10). All these passages, 
 if interpreted to favor Pre-millennialism at all, prove 
 too much. They not only assume that Christ might 
 come, but that He certainly would come, in the gen- 
 eration then living, and the teaching was false. Tlie 
 interpretation which commits us to Pre millennialism, 
 thus inevitably leads us to a conclusion which makes 
 the apostles fallible, and their teaching of no sure 
 worth to prove anytliing. 
 
 This leads us to our first position : 
 
 1. There are " comings " of the Lord spoken of in 
 the New Testament other than His visible and per- 
 sonal advent. 
 
 (1) The Lord is represented as coming in His spe- 
 cial and more striking providential dealings with 
 men. 
 
 Many illustrations of this usage are found in the 
 Old Testament : " In every place when I record my 
 name, I will come unto thee and I will bless thee " 
 
 I 
 
THE EVER-IMMINENT COMINO OF OI'U T.OUn. 17r) 
 
 (Kx. 20 : 'l-i). " Ve <'re a stifriiockiMl ix'oplo : if I ^^o up 
 into the midst of tliuo lor one nioinciit, 1 shall coiisuine 
 tliee " (Kx. *V'] : 5). " Ho Ixnved tlio hojivons also and 
 ciune «lo\vn" (2 Sam. 22 : 10). "Our Cod sliall como 
 and shall not keep silence" (Ps. 50: ')). " 15ow thy 
 heavens, () Lord, and come down " (Ps. 144 : 5). "I>e- 
 lioM the Lord rideth upon a swift cloud and eometh 
 unto K(rypt" (Lsa. 10 : 1). "Behold, (lod will come 
 with ven<;eance, with the recompense of CJod : he will 
 cojne and save you" (lsa. .35 : 4). "Oh that thou 
 wouldest rend the heavens and come down. 
 When thou didst terrible thinffs which we looked not 
 for, thou camest down " (lsa. 04 : l-.S ; see also Ps. JSO : 
 2 : Micah 1 : 3-5 ; 7:4; Mai. 4:0; Zeph. 1 : 7, etc.). 
 
 So, likewise, the pourinff out of some great ju<lg- 
 nient is fre<|uently called the coming of the day of 
 the Lord. (lsa. 2:12; Joel 1:15; 2:11: Amos 5 : 
 18-20; Zeph. 1 : 7, etc.) 
 
 It need not surprise us, therefore, if, in the New 
 Testament, the grander displays of the divine power 
 in Providence, should be called the coming of the 
 Lord, or the day of the Lord. It would rather be 
 strange if no such allusions were found there. 
 
 We do find, in the New Testament, our Lord's pro- 
 vidential dealings called His coming. The references 
 to the Lord's coming in the letters to the seven 
 churches are all acknowledged, by such a champion 
 of Pre-milleimialism as Dr. Kellogg, to be allusions to 
 His comings in Providence. The most judicious of 
 con^imentators who, in some points, agree with Pre- 
 millennlalists, also explain them the same wtiy, e.g., 
 
 a.. ? 
 
 ;rV It •• 
 
 '■-■- "i i 
 
17G 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCllAToLUfJV. 
 
 Alford, Meyer. No ono wlio .studios them can reacli 
 any other conclusion. Our Lord says to tlie church 
 at Kpliesus : " Remember tlierel'ore from whence thou 
 art fallen, and repent, and do tlie first works; or 
 else I come to thee, and will move thy candlestick out 
 of its place, e.xcept thou repent" (Ilev. 2:5); to the 
 church at Per<;amos : " Repent therefore ; or else I 
 come to tliee (juickly, and I will make war against 
 theni with the sword of my mouth" (2: 10); to the 
 church in Sardis : " Remendjer therefore how thou 
 hast received and didst hear; and keep it, and repent. 
 If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come as a 
 thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come 
 upon thee "(3 : 3). 
 
 Now, our Lord's second an<i personal coming was 
 not determined by the impenitence of these churches, 
 as the comings here mentioned are. The judgments 
 which are threatened constituted His coming, in each 
 case, and these have long since fallen upon theni. 
 
 (2) Our Lord is said to come to take His people to 
 himself when they die. 1 know that our pre-millen- 
 nial brethren regard the thought of this as almost a 
 shocking one. They speak of death as a repulsive 
 thing, as the "king of terrors," as something to be 
 dreaded, even by believers. They heap all manner of 
 contempt upon the idea that anytl 'ng so loathsome 
 as death w^ould be called the coming of the Lord. 
 One of the greatest joys in the thought that our 
 Lord may immediately appear is that thus they may 
 escape this " enemy." All the same, however, for over 
 eighteen centuries since Christ came, believers have 
 
be 
 r of 
 oine 
 ord. 
 our 
 nay 
 3ver 
 lave 
 
 THE EVER-IMMINENT COMINO OK OFU LORD. 177 
 
 all liad to (lie. Howc^ver much tlu'y may liavc rcjoicod 
 in tlie liopo of heinjif spared bodily disHolution, their 
 liope lias proved an ilhision, and, perluipH, deatli has 
 been all the more bitter })ecauHe they had learned to 
 look upon it as such a fearful thin((. Surely this is a 
 false view of the nature of death to the believer. 
 Clin we believe our Lord, for aj^es, would make no 
 adefjuate provision for His people in the hist soleuiii 
 hour ? Does all tliis represent correctly the teaching 
 of the Bible, or the facts of Christian deathbeds ? 
 Death is represented as a falling asleep. Paul says 
 tliat " the sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is 
 the law : but," he joyfully adds, " thanks be to God, 
 which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus 
 (nirist " (1 Cor. 15 : 56, 57). Even the body shall be 
 the trophy of victory at the resurrection. Christ 
 died " that he miglit bring to nought him that had 
 the power of death, that is, the devil ; and might 
 deliver all them who through fear of death were all 
 their lifetime subject to bondage " (Heb. 2:14,15). 
 Paul can desire to "depart and be with Christ," 
 althouirh lie knows that death will meet him on the 
 way (Phil. 1 : 23). When the time comes for him to 
 face death he can exult (2 Tim. 4 : 7). In the New 
 Testament, although deatli is called an enemy, he is 
 an enemy which is overcome for us now, as he shall 
 be destroyed at the resurrection. The New Testa- 
 ment does not give us a sombre view of death. Ample 
 provision is made for the believer against its? dread 
 and power. This pre-millennial representation is, we 
 
 X2 
 
 ■!'■■ 
 
 riTV 
 
Q 
 
 178 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCUATOLOCiY. 
 
 are Hiirc, as unwliolesoinc as it is a misconception of 
 Bible teaching;. 
 
 Whatever may be said of the other references to the 
 Lord's cominjif, there is one wliich seems undoubtedly 
 to be to His coming for the believer at death. We 
 refer to John 14 : 1-4: 
 
 " Let not your heart be troubled ; ye believe in 
 God, believe also in mo. In my F'ather's house are 
 many mansions; if it were not so I would have told 
 you ; for I go to prepare a place for you. And if I 
 go and prepare a place for you, I come again, and 
 will receive you unto myself : that where I am, there 
 ye may be also." 
 
 Now the Father's house, with tlie mansions or 
 abiding places, was in heaven, whither Jesus was 
 going, not on earth in the millennial glory. Neither 
 were His people to be kept waiting for hundreds and 
 perhaps thousands of years, before they were to be 
 received by Christ to himself, to abide with Him in 
 these homes He was preparing for them. Paul knew 
 that to die was to be with Christ, and so it is with 
 all who believe on Him. They do not have to wait 
 until the resurrection of the body to be received by 
 our Lord unto himself. It is at death they are thus 
 received, and are with Christ in the mansions pre- 
 pared in heaven. It is at death, then, that Jesus 
 comes for them, and this is the comfort for all His 
 people. Those who assert that it is not at death, 
 but at His second personal advent, win either have to 
 show that believers are not received to the abidin^^ 
 places in heaven until the later coming, or that,whiJo 
 
'1 
 
 f 
 
 and 
 
 bo be 
 
 iin m 
 
 Knew 
 
 with 
 
 wait 
 
 (1 by 
 thus 
 I pre- 
 Jesus 
 I His 
 ieath, 
 ave to 
 )idin<,^ 
 while 
 
 THE EVEIMMMINEXT (Y)MI\fi OF oru LORD. 179 
 
 roc(!ivt'(l tt) be with Christ at (h'utli, our lionl hrro 
 pasHCH over all the time wliich they are with Him 
 until then, and speaks as thouj^h they were first taken 
 to himself at that late date. 
 
 Notice also another passat^e, Luke 12 : 4JJ-4G (com p. 
 Matt. 24:47-51): "Blessed is that servant whom his 
 lord, when he cometh, shall find so doint^ Of a 
 truth I say unto you, that he will set him over all 
 that he hath. But if that servant shall say in his 
 heart, My lord delayeth his comin<^, and shall begin 
 to beat the manservants and the maidservants, and 
 to eat and drink, and to be drunken, the lord of that 
 servant shall come in a day when he expecteth not, 
 . . . and shall cut him asunder, and appoint his 
 portion with the unfaithful." 
 
 This parable is given in reply to Peter's (question : 
 " Lord, speakest thou this parable to us, or even unto 
 all V Even if what our Lord proceeds to say referred 
 to the apostles exclusively, it cannot be His personal 
 coming which is spoken of ; for they have been for 
 long centuries in glory with their Lord, and how can 
 they be found watching at a coming which is still 
 future ? But our Lord is evidently here speaking in 
 !i general way ; He includes the apostles, but only as 
 they belong to the class they represent throughout 
 the ages. But if He referred to all of this class, it is 
 equally impossible for His personal advent to be here 
 alluded to. For, let it be noticed, the watching and 
 the lieedlessness here spoken of are not merely in 
 view of a coming which may or may not occur during 
 the period of watching or carelessness, Tliey are in 
 
 
 
180 
 
 A STl'DV FN KSCHATor.OnY. 
 
 il 
 
 s 
 
 viow of a coiniii^f which is oortaiii to hapjx'U during 
 that time. It is not "whom the Ijonl, il' He conies, 
 shall tiiul,"etc.; but " the Lord, ichcn He comes, shall 
 find so doin<^." How can the Lord, when He comes, 
 we know not how \on<r hence, find ail the faithful 
 of the class He refers to, still watchin*;, when they 
 have heen with Him, many of them, for nearly two 
 thousand years:* Observe, also, it is oidy "if that 
 servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his 
 comin^^," etc. ; or, on this con<lition, that our Lord 
 declares He will come upon him with destruction. 
 Now, who can hold that our Lord's personal advent is 
 determined by the disobedience of some of His pro- 
 fessed servants? A^ain, the conung here spoken of, 
 with its destruction, is to overtake the unfaithful 
 servant in the midst of his violence and riotousness. 
 Does our Lord's second advent, which is still future, 
 cut oti" all this class throughout the ages, in the midst 
 of their sin ? This coming, therefore, is one which 
 takes place in the lifetime of both faithful and 
 unfaithful, through all time. The only possible escape 
 from this conclusion would be on an impossible 
 assumption that our Lord is here not speaking gener- 
 ally so as to include the apostles and encourage them 
 to faithfulness and warn them against unfaithfulness, 
 by His words ; but that He is alluding exclusively to 
 a generation two thousand years or more in the 
 future. Besides, in any case, if we refer this parable 
 exclusively to our Lord's second coming, the reward 
 and punishment here described would be only for 
 those of the last generation, while it is obviously 
 
THK EVKIMMMIVENT roMIN'O OF (M'U LOHD. IHI 
 
 iiu'jint to oncoura;^o and warn peopl** in all aj^cs. 
 Tliure iH a coinin*^* liere spokon of, then, wliicli hIuiH 
 be to all earlier i^enemtionH what the perHonal a«lvent 
 of our Lonl shall be to tlie last. 
 
 Now, if this is mule clear, it is further evident 
 that tlie (loom which the coininj^ of the Lord brings 
 to tile luifaithful servant is His death, beinj^ "cut 
 asunder," one form of judicial execution, and what 
 comes after ileatli, "appointing; Ins place with the un- 
 faithful," or hypocrites, as Matt. 24:51. The Lord's 
 coming in this passage, then, seems to be His coming 
 with His judgments at deatii. It is most reasonable to 
 believe, also, that His coming to the faithful, here 
 spoken of, is His coming at death also. It appears 
 impossible, at least, to make tliis coming other than 
 tliat either in providence or at death. 
 
 In this connection, three allusions to the coming of 
 the Lord in the letters to the seven churches deserve 
 attention. To the church in Thyatira our Lord says, 
 " Howbeit that which ye have, hold fast till I come " 
 (Rev. 2 : 25) ; to the church in Philadelphia, "I come 
 (juickly : hold fast that which thou hast, that no one 
 take thy crown" (3: II); to the church in Smyrna, 
 " Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee the 
 crown of life " (2 : 10). " That which ye have," " That 
 which thou hast," refer to the faithfulness already 
 shown in trials and temptations. This they were ex- 
 horted to maintain until the Lord came. What is the 
 coming here spoken of ? It is only a (juestion between 
 the coming in providence and in death. The provi- 
 dences which some have thouirht to be His cominfj are 
 
 1. 1 
 
 ■■I 
 
•^mmFm 
 
 182 
 
 A STITPY i\ EsnrAToi.oov. 
 
 \l 
 
 
 » 
 
 ! 
 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 1 
 
 k 
 
 ^11 
 
 . J 
 
 L 
 
 thn trials about to como, vvhicli should trst tin- faith- 
 fulrioHH they wen; oxhortod to hold last throuj;h them 
 (hoo 2 : 2:J, 8: 10). Hut if this Ix- the coiiiin;j of tho 
 Lord, then tlie exhortation nuist have been, " hold 
 fast when I cotne in these trijils," not " till I come in 
 theui." The coinin<.j, then, would seem to be when 
 JesuH ai)j)(!ars to deliver them from the trials, when 
 the testing shall be over. In 3: 11, where H<; says, 
 " I come (|uicUly," lioM fast the faithfulness already 
 HJiown, in the trials I have just told you are about to 
 come, He means, " He patient, endure the trials : you 
 will not have to suffer them lon<;. I come quickly to 
 deliver you fnnn them." Compare, also, these expres- 
 sicms ^iven alK)ve. It is by holdin<.( fast their faith- 
 fulness, until tlie Lord comes, and comes (piickly, that 
 they are to make sure of the crown prepared (2 : 20 ; 
 3:11). It is in Rev. 2 : 10, by bein^r faithful unto 
 death, that they are to assume their crown. Does not 
 this mean that the coming of the Lord is at their 
 deatli, when He comes to take them from the trials, 
 after tliey have t^iven them sutticient testing ? It 
 seems hard to escape the conclusion. 
 
 (8) There is a comin<jf of the Lord in His kinj^dom 
 spoken of, v;hich does not refer to this personal advc^nt. 
 
 We have already referred to Matt. 10: 28: *' Verily 
 I say unto you, there be sonje of them that stand here, 
 which shall in no wise taste of death, till they see the 
 Son of man cominjj; in his kingdom." Tl)is coming was 
 not to be till some of them had died, while it was to 
 occur before all were dead. There should be, " some of 
 them " alive, when He should thus come, and only some 
 
THE EVEH-lMMfVENT COMINcJ OP OlMl LORD. 183 
 
 of thcni. All who <li«l live until thiH coming were to 
 Heo it. The attempt to break the force of this pHHflage 
 hy making the coming spoken of His tran.stiguration 
 Itofore but three of them only six days after, and while 
 they were all still living, is worse than useless. 
 
 Doubtless Matt. 10: 28 refers to this .same coming. 
 " iiut when they persecute you in this city, flee into 
 the next: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have 
 go!je through the cities of Israel, till the Son of man 
 lie come." Now, there have actually been some wlio, 
 in their zeal to refer all the comings of the Lord to 
 His second personal advent, have argued that *' the 
 cities of Israel have not yet been " gone through. 
 
 They do not seem to have noticed that our Lord was 
 addressing His twelve disciples in all this chapter, 
 and that this coming should happen while these twelve 
 were going about their work in Palestine. Compare 
 with this Matt. 24 : 14 : " And the gospel of the king- 
 dom shall be preached in the whole world (inhabited 
 earth) for a testimony unto all the nations : and then 
 shall the end come." The end and the coming of the 
 Lord are acknowledged to be the same period. Now, 
 are we to believe that the coming of the Lord, which 
 should happen before the apostles had gone through 
 the cities of Lsrael, and the coming that was not to 
 occur until the Gospel had been preached in all the 
 world, are the same ? If they are the same, all the 
 worse for our pre-millennial friends, for the time speci- 
 fied for the coming in the first passage is already long 
 past. Therefore, that of the second is long past also, 
 and neitlier of them refers to His personal advent. 
 
 
 n 
 
 
 

 ill 
 
 1 
 
 ill 
 
 184 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCnAT()L(MJV. 
 
 Lf 
 
 Hut tlio (ioNpol )ia.s not yet Ix^fii {>reaclio<l in all thn 
 worM for a wittu'HH, as i're-iiiillciiiiialiHtH lieliuvc, an<l 
 nil iniiHt hold who hcliovt' thi.s coining to In; HIh {xt- 
 Honal advent ; for had it hccn, our Lord would have 
 come aH He had promised. Tlie coming of Mutt. 10 : 
 23, at lea.st, i.s lonj; past. 
 
 (4) Our Lonl duelareH He himsi'lf wouM come in 
 thecomin<rof tliu Spirit (John 14: \H, 23: 10 : l()-22). 
 
 (.'>) There i.s also a coming of the Lord which i^ 
 spiritual (Rev. 3: 20; Kph. 2: 17, etc.). 
 
 2 In view of these forms in which our Lord issai<l 
 to come, liow shall we explain the references to llin 
 coming in the New Testament f 
 
 (1) Let us notice, first, the cla.ss of pa.s.sa;;es in which 
 helievers are represented as waiting, or looking for 
 the coming of the Lord, or are exhorted thus to do. 
 
 " So that ye come behind in no gift : waiting for 
 the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ: who shall 
 also confinn you unto the end, that ye he unreprove- 
 able in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Cor. 1 : 
 7,8). *' For our citizenship is in heaven : from whence 
 also we wait for a Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: 
 who shall fashion anew the body of our humiliation, 
 that it may be conformed to the body of His glory" 
 (Phil. 3: 20, 21) " How ye turned unto Goil from 
 idols, to serve the living and true God, and to wait for 
 his Son from heaven" (1 Thess. 1 : 9, 10). "Denying 
 ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly 
 and righteously and godly in this present world, 
 looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the 
 glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ " 
 
 I, I 
 
TUF KVKH-IMMINEST C(>MIS<J OK Ol'lt I.OIID. IK.'i 
 
 (Tit. 2: 12. I:J). " Sr^in^ tliut tln'M« tliiti^cs an' tlius 
 all to bo ilisHolvrd, whut iimniuT of ihtmoiim ()u;;ht yo 
 t<» Ih) ill all iioly living; aii<l ;(i)(llin«'MM, Inokiii^ for and 
 uarncstly «lr.siriii;; the coiiiiii^^ of tlu' day of Go«i," etc. 
 (2 Pot. 3:11, \'2). 
 
 There are Noiiie lVe-iiiilleiiMiaiiHt.s who deem it iiii- 
 poHHihle to wait for, or look for, a coining,' of the Lord 
 which in not j)os.sil)le at any iiioiiieiit. They, there- 
 fore, conclude from these j>a.sMa;;(!s, as well as from 
 others, that the Nc^w Ti^staiiieiit writers must have 
 rej^arde'd the personal advent of our Lord as possibly 
 at hand. Hut this is an extreme view of the case, as 
 some pre-millennial brethren themselves acknowledge ; 
 for we can wait and look for what we know to be in 
 the future. We wait and look for tlu' return of dear 
 friends from the day of their departure, althouj^h 
 they are to be absent for weeks or months or even 
 years. In this case, '"wait" is used in the Hense of 
 making the return the ;;reat object of desire : it is ever 
 kept in lon;^in;( thou»;lit. A ;;eneral is said to wait 
 for a batth' he knows will not be foujrht for days or 
 weeks. " Wait," in this case, is used in the sense of 
 having all his preparations so made for the; enemy 
 tliat he has nothing else to do, with reference to the 
 coiiiinj^ conlliet, until the battle. In )>oth these senses 
 we can wait and look for the c()iiiiii<^ of the Lord, 
 whatever be our idea of the time of liiscomin^r. The 
 condition of the waitin*' is not the nearness but the 
 certainty of His coming;. If we know that our Lord 
 is surely coming, and that we shall iiave the same 
 share in all the blessings He comes to brinj^f whether 
 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 
^J 
 
 ^%. 
 
 V>".i. '\ 
 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 y 
 
 A 
 
 O 
 
 
 ^ «?, 
 
 
 t^'^ 
 
 :/ 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 li 
 
 Ilia 
 
 IIIIM 
 
 iliio 
 
 III 2.2 
 
 1.8 
 
 U IIIIII.6 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 iV 
 
 iV 
 
 "9) 
 
 V 
 
 M 
 
 4^ 
 
 :\ 
 
 \ 
 
 )^' 
 
 M 
 
 ^ <i 
 
 #».t 
 
 '^9)" 
 
 o'^ 
 
Q"' 
 
 •A 
 
186 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 11 
 
 r 
 
 l?ii 
 
 PI 
 
 He appears to-morrow or a thousand years hence, we 
 can hold His coming in thought as the great object 
 of desire, and be moved to faithfulness in order to be 
 prepared for it, especially when it is remembered that 
 the time for this preparation is limited to a life 
 which may end at any time. 
 
 But neither Paul Tior Peter, when writing these 
 epistles, in which these expressions are found, thought 
 the coming of the Lord might be immediately im- 
 pending. 
 
 In the last chapter of First Corinthians, in which 
 one of the passages is found, Paul expects to return 
 to Corinth (16 : 2), then to send on their contribu- 
 tions to Jerusalem, and perhaps go himself (vs. 3, 4) 
 after he had passed through Macedonia (v. 5). He 
 expects to tarry at Ephesus until Pjentecost, etc. Now, 
 if the Corinthians could wait for what they knew 
 would not take place for months, and was indefinitely 
 future, why was it impossible to wait for what was to 
 be a thousand years hence ? Then we know that in 
 the second letter to the Thessalonians, Paul definitely 
 puts the coming of the Lord into the indefinite future. 
 He could not have meant, therefore, in 1 Thess. 1 : 9, 
 10, that the coming of the Lord might be immediately 
 impending, because the Thessalonian Christians were 
 to "wait for his Son from heaven." 
 
 This class of passages really teaches that believers 
 are to keep the coming of the Lord, as the great con- 
 summation of their highest hopes, ever present in their 
 thought and feeling, so as to act continually in view 
 of it and its power, as though it were actually near. 
 
THE EVER-IMMINENT COMING OF OUR LORD. 187 
 
 (2) In the second place, let uh notice the class of 
 passages in which believers are exhorted to faithful- 
 ness, or growth in grace is said to continue " until " 
 Christ comes. 
 
 " He which began a sure work in you will perfect 
 it until the day of Jesus Christ " (Phil. 1 : G) ; " That 
 ye may be sincere and void of offence unto the day of 
 Christ" (v. 10) : "That thou keep the commandment 
 without spot, without reproach, until the appearance 
 of our Lord Jesus Christ" (I Tim. 6: 14); "Be 
 patient, therefore, brethren, until the coming of the 
 Lord" (Jas. 0:7); " Trade ye herewith till 1 come" 
 (Luke 19 : 18); " We shall not all sleep, but we shall 
 all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an 
 eye — the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we 
 shall be changed" (1 Cor. 15: 51, 52); "We that are 
 alive, that are left unto the coming of the Lord " 
 (1 Thess. 4: 15). 
 
 As already remarked, these passages, if they teach 
 anything about the nearness of our Lord's advent, 
 declare too much, for they would make it apparent 
 that the authors of the New Testament not only 
 thought this great event possibly, but certainly near. 
 This would be in conflict with the knowledge they 
 show they had of events which they knew must 
 happen before His coming. 
 
 It would also prove that, in statements which are 
 made in the most categorical way, they were in the 
 most grievous error, and would make it impossible for 
 us to trust them as inspired t(>achers in anything. 
 How then are we to explain these various passages ? 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
1S8 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOfJY. 
 
 m 
 
 lili 
 
 Our Lord and the scripture writers knew that their 
 teaching was for more than those first addressed. 
 They had in mind all to whom it was to apply down 
 through thti ages to the end. When Paul says to the 
 Corintliians, " For as oft as ye eat this bread and 
 drink this cup, ye proclaim the Lord's death till 
 he come" (1 Cor. 11 : 26), he did not mean that 
 these identical believers were to continue to observe 
 the Supper t:ll the coming of the Lord. He had in 
 mind the whole continuous line of believers, beginning 
 with them, and reaching down to the second coming. 
 The "ye" of direct address included all living saints 
 until that time. This great succession of believers 
 should continue to observe the Supper until His 
 second advent. So, also, our Lord, in the great com- 
 mission, " Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the 
 nations : and lo, I am with you alway, even unto the 
 end of the world " (Matt. 28 : 19, 20). He surely did 
 not expect the eleven disciples he was addressing to 
 " make disciples of all the nations." It was not with 
 them only He was to be " until the end of the world." 
 He evidently had in mind the collective body of 
 believers beginning with them, but reaching on until 
 the end of the world, when the great commission 
 should be fulfilled. In the parable (Luke 19 : 13) the 
 ten servants represent all of the class mentioned 
 throughout the ages. In this same way must I Cor. 
 15: 51, 52 and 1 Thess. 4: 15 be explained. Paul 
 did not expect, with the Corinthian and Thessalonian 
 brethren, to live on until our Lord's second advent. 
 There were to be two classes then, the dead and the 
 
THE EVER-IMMIXKNT OOMlVn OF nvU LORD. ISO 
 
 ■M 
 
 
 the former to be raised, tlic latter to be 
 clian<ije(l. He naturally continues to reckon himself 
 and his fellow-Christians then, in the class they were 
 in now, as in his thought he thus takes in all the living 
 and all the dead. 
 
 Another principle comes in, perhaps, to help us 
 explain some of the passages that remain. The 
 second coming looms up, often, in overshadowing 
 grandeur, in the apostle's thought. Then, also, only 
 the life on earth has to do with determining the 
 relation in which men will stand to this grand event, 
 whether as prepared or unprepared. It is not sur- 
 prising, therefore, that the time between death and 
 the second coming should drop out of view, both as 
 overshadowed by it, and as having no direct bearing 
 upon the condition of men in that fateful day ; and 
 that this supreme and transcendent day should bo 
 spoken of as in immediate connection with the life on 
 earth. The first four passages given above seem, on 
 this principle, to have a natural explanation. 
 
 (3) In this connection let us consider the last, and 
 perhaps the most difficult, group of passages we need 
 to examine. We refer to those in 'Vv^hich men are 
 connnanded to watch, in view of the coming of the 
 Lord. We may be surprised to know that all of these 
 in the gospels are in connection with a single discourse 
 of our Lord. We have then, really but the varied 
 references of this kind to deal with, given at a single 
 sitting of our Lord. It will be found that parts of all 
 the passages in Mark and Luke, embodying commands 
 to watch, are contained in Matt. 24 : 37-51, We con- 
 
 1 .i 
 
 i 
 
 ^ 
 
 I! 
 
 I 
 
^ 
 
 m 
 
 1 
 
 190 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOHY. 
 
 i 
 i 
 
 'l 
 
 i ii ' '■ ' 
 
 
 ■i -' :■ i 
 
 llliili 
 
 cludf, tliureforo, tliat what thoy ^ivo, in these connected 
 pussaj^GH, not found in Matt. 24 : 87-51, are but fuller 
 accounts of the same thought. 
 
 Let UH, then, examine Matt. 24: 37-ol in the connec- 
 tion in which it stands. The difficulty in interpreting 
 this discourse of our Lord, as given in Matt. 24, Mark 
 13, and Luke 21, is acknowledged. 
 
 In Mark 13:4 and Luke 21 : 7 it is represented as 
 given in answer to a specific question as to the time 
 when the temple was to be destroyed. In Matt. 24: 3, 
 there is added, " And what shall be the sign of thy 
 coming, and of the end of the world ? " Our Lord 
 answers both the questions. But the answer is not 
 first given of one and then of the other, with a clear 
 line of division between : it is rather, in part of the 
 discourse, at least, an answer of one of the questions 
 through that of the other which was its type. 
 
 The crux of the difficulty is in v. 34 : " Verily I say 
 unto you. This generation shall not pass away till all 
 these things be accomplished." There are three chief 
 interpretations. There is that of the rationalistic inter- 
 preters who hold that " generation " here means the 
 people then living, and that our Lord really believed 
 Jerusalem was not only to fall, but He himself was to 
 return in person to end the world, within this brief 
 space. This view, as is readily seen, assumes that 
 our Lord is not only ignorant of the time of His com- 
 ing, but though ignorant. He makes the most positive 
 statement possible, prefacing it with " verily " as 
 though it could not be disputed, as to the terminus 
 ad qiiem, for His coming ; and that this positive state- 
 
THE EVER-IMMINENT OOMINO OF OUR LORD. 191 
 
 merit, iiuide with such perfect assurance and with 
 sucli manifest intention that it sliould be received as 
 true, was to prove false by we know not how nuich 
 more than eighteen centuries. We can suppose our 
 Lord ignorant of the precise time of His second 
 coming; but we cannot beUeve Him to be uncon- • 
 scious of His ignorance, or, when conscious of it, 
 to hazard the most positive statements as tliough 
 He had the most definite knowledge. This interpre- 
 tation, at least, assumes our Lord not only to be 
 ignorant, but that He might think that He knew that 
 whereof He was thus ignorant, and to declare, under 
 this delusion, what was to prove untrue. Then away 
 forever with the thought of His infallibility as a 
 teacher of truth. But how, in that case, is it io be 
 explained that, in no other instance, lias the truth 
 of either His prophecies or His teachings been success- 
 fully challenged by candid men ? If He were in such 
 grievous error in His statement in this discourse as to 
 His second coming, liow^ comes it that in all pertain- 
 ing to the destruction of Jerusalem the event proved 
 Him to have had such accurate knowledge ? We 
 reject this interpretation as not self -consistent, and 
 as involving what is contradictory and subversive of 
 all reliance upon even the words of our Lord as a 
 revelation from God. 
 
 The second is the pre-millennial interpretation 
 which makes the word "generation " mean "nation" 
 or " race." The verse then reads : " This nation or 
 race shall not pass away," etc. 
 
 But, as Dr. Broadus says, '* The word cannot have 
 
 
 fif- 
 
■m 
 
 
 192 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 A' 
 
 Ml 
 
 lliHiil! 
 
 ii 
 
 i I 
 
 Til 
 
 any other meuniiif^ havr, than tlio obvious one. rue 
 atteniptfi to cHtabliwli for it the Henso of race or nation 
 have failed. Tliero are Home examples in which it 
 might have such a meaning, hut none in which it 
 must, for in Qvery case the recognized meaning will 
 answer, and so another sense is not admissible.* 
 
 Olshausen also declares, " The word yevsa is not 
 used in the sense of natron in any one passage, either 
 of the New Testament or of profane writers,"f 
 
 So of commentators generally, excepting Alford. 
 
 But even though the sense nation were allowable 
 here, on philological grounds, it would not helj) those 
 who hold the coming of the Lord spoken of in this 
 chapter to be exclusively His personal advent ; for 
 the Jewish nation has long ceased to exist, and still 
 our Lord tarries. If " generation " here means 
 " nation," the coming in our Lord's thought, when He 
 uttered these words, must have been the providential, 
 at the destruction of Jerusalem, when the Romans 
 took away from the Jews their " name and nation." 
 Neither will the sense of race serve, in the connection 
 of this passage. Did the disciples suppose the race 
 of men in general, or of the Jews in particular, might 
 be blotted out before their Lord's return, tliat He 
 needed to assure them to the contrary, in this most 
 solemn and emphatic way ? If this were their thought 
 which He needed to correct, they evidently did not 
 suppose His personal advent to be very near, for we 
 can scarcely suppose they thought the race was about 
 
 « << 
 
 Commentary" in loco. 
 
 t " Commentary" in loco. 
 
THE EVER-IMMINENT CoMINO OK OUR LORD. 103 
 
 to be cut ott". I^osi<los, the implication of the words, 
 ' This croncration wliall not pass away until," etc., is 
 that what is foretold is not completely fulfilled "until" 
 the tjeneration is near its end. If jreneration here 
 mean Vdce, then it means that the comin<jj of the 
 Lord here spoken of is to he delayed until the Jewish 
 race was nearin^^ the end of its existence. In any 
 ca.se, then, this discourse, on the pre-millennial 
 assumption, instead of giving the impression that our 
 Lord's second coming might possibly be nigh, would 
 put it forward into the dim and indefinite distance, 
 and make inexplicable how He could proceed to give 
 the disciples the solemn warnings to watch and be 
 ready, lest it might come upon them as a thief. 
 
 It is also evident our Lord thought it extremely 
 important that His disciples should hear what He 
 was saying. He introduces this sentence with the 
 emphatic note of attention, " Verily." Can we doubt 
 He intended them to understand Him and thought 
 they did so ? But could they possibly have under- 
 stood this generation here to have meant this race, 
 when the word He used never signified race but 
 always generation, and when, too, there was a word 
 which meant race rather than generation, which He 
 might have used ? But did He intend them to under- 
 stand the word which usually, if not invariably, meant 
 the short period of a single life, to have the sense of 
 race, a term covering a great and indefinite length of 
 time ? If He did make them understand that in the 
 connection in which He used it, the word meant an 
 indefinitely long instead of a short period, then can 
 13 
 
 i 
 
 r;4i 
 
 
'•"»wi«p 
 
 194 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCnATOI,0(JY. 
 
 PI 
 
 ! I 
 
 3 
 
 ^mi 
 
 wo CHcajx! tli(^ conclusion tliat Ho took Hp(>cial pain.s 
 to (linabuso their iiiinds of tlio tl»ou<;ht of the possiblo 
 nearness of His second advent, and intended tlie uum 
 of tliat generation, at least, to dismiss it from tlieir 
 practical thought ? 
 
 Thus we see that no help can come to the pre- 
 millennial view, even if we allow the word generation 
 the meanings its advocates would force upon the word. 
 
 The third interpretation of this passage does not 
 ask us to believe our Lord used the word " geiusra- 
 tion" in an unusual, if not an unknown, sense, and 
 then urged upon them the fact thus stated in lan- 
 guage they would not be expected to understand, as 
 though it were of the greatest practical moment. 
 The usual, if not the invariable, meaning of the word 
 is^maintained. 
 
 It is in this generation — in the lifetime of the 
 people then I'ving — that all these things, including 
 the Lord's coming, were to have their fulfilment. But 
 how can this be when He had been speaking about 
 the destruction of Jerusalem and His second and per- 
 sonal advent ? 
 
 As we have already seen, there was a coming of the 
 Lord to occur in the lifetime of that generation. 
 In Matt. 16:28: "There be some that stand here, 
 who shall in no wise taste of death till they see the 
 Son of man coming in his kingdom." Dr. Broadus, 
 voicing the conclusion of a host of commentators, de- 
 clares this is an undoubted reference to the destruc- 
 tion of Jerusalem.* And yet, in the preceding verse 
 
 * "Com. on Matt.," pp. 228, 368. 
 
THE EVER-IMMIXENT TOMTNTJ OF OUR LORD. 105 
 
 the 
 
 Ition. 
 
 [lere, 
 
 the 
 
 .dus, 
 
 de- 
 
 ,ruc- 
 
 erse 
 
 (Matt. 10: 27) our Lord liiul as uiidouljtedly bcon re- 
 ferrin*; to His second and visihlo advent: 
 
 'or tno 
 
 th 
 
 Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father, 
 witli his antjfels, and tluni shall he render ufito every 
 
 imm accordin<r to his deed' 
 
 '{'here is here the most 
 
 sudden transition from His second personal eominj^, 
 wliich none then livin<( was to see, to a comin<( so 
 near that some then livin*: should behold it. In the 
 same way, in this discourse of Matt. 24, our Lonl 
 makes as sudden transitions between what refers to 
 the de .truction of Jerusalem and His second advent. 
 How can this be explained except that the destruction 
 of Jerusalem here, as in Matt. 16 : 28, is spoken of as 
 a coming of the Lord, and a type of His final coming, 
 so that one can be, and is, referred to in terms 
 of the other ? Our Lord saw in the destruction of 
 Jerusalem a reflection of His grander coming at the 
 end of the world. While speaking directly of the 
 one, He also had His eye fixed, through it, upon the 
 other. There is thus an interblending, to a large ex- 
 tent, of the two events, and language is used of one 
 which will apply to both. The lesser coming is the 
 type and prophecy of the grander, and the same de- 
 scriptions have a double reference to both. We do 
 not mean that all the language is of this character, 
 but that some of it is. Understood in this way, v. 34 
 means : "All the things which are to have a grander 
 fulfilment in my grander coming, this generation shall 
 live to see in the lesser fulfilment in my lesser com- 
 ing, at the destruction of Jerusalem. Ye shall live to 
 see the fulfilment of all these things in the type, 
 
 
 BWm: 
 
 m 
 
 ! 
 
 n ; 
 
 If* 5 
 
'"'W 
 
 106 
 
 A STrnV IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 which aro lator to coino to paa.s in the* ^rundcr way 
 in tho antitypo." Students of Old 'rcHtanicnt pro- 
 phecy, wlio have noticed liow tlie (grander deliver- 
 ances of the t^ospel day are descrihed in lan<^ua<;o 
 whieli refers directly to the rescue from the captivity 
 in Babylon, and how, in many other cases, the pro- 
 phets weave descriptions of what is to occur in tho 
 remote future arountl events which are soon to hap- 
 pen to those wh(>m they are addressin<jf, will not have 
 so <^reat ditliculty in acceptin<»" this interpn^tation ot 
 Matt. 24 : 84. 
 
 Understood in this way, the exhortations to watch- 
 fulness because of the imminence and suddenness of 
 the Lord's comin<^ wliich follow, are not so hard to 
 explain. There was a coming which was imminent. 
 This was the grand stroke of His providence in the 
 destruction of Jerusalem. While this one coming in 
 this one provi<lential event would serve as a basis 
 of warning for the people of the Krst generation of 
 our era, just as His grander personal coming would 
 thus serve for the last, our Lord was speaking for 
 the people of all ages, and these two specific com- 
 ings would not serve this purpose for the genera- 
 tions between. We find our Lord, therefore, in Matt. 
 24 : 45 sq., and in Luke 12 : 42 where the sa»ne or 
 a similar discourse is recorded, generalizing, and 
 thus making the warnings applicable to all in all 
 time, by stating there was a coming for reward to 
 the faithful and judgment upon the unfaithful which 
 was sure to all, and which we have found reason to 
 believe is our Lord's providential coming at death. 
 
THK EVEU-IMMINKNT CUMIXO OF Ollll LOUD. 1!>7 
 
 Tliusu forms oF our Lord's providontijil coinin^H arc 
 but typos of His final and personal advent, and 
 ^a\n their fullest si;^nilicance from it. Throu<^li tlieso 
 lesser foreshado\vin;(s, therefore, men are to have 
 their minds fixed u[)()n the larger reality, just us the 
 Jews were to see Christ's <;reater sacrifice throu^^h the 
 typical ofl'ei'infifH of the old economy. Nv'hile refer- 
 ring-, therefore, to the nearer event, and the laujc^ua^e, 
 "Ye know not the day nor the hour," and similar 
 expressions are appropriate to it directly, in a larjjfer 
 sense, we are to watch, also, in view of the t^rander 
 comin((, as we are vi(j^ilant and ever alert to be ready 
 for it, seein*;" that our term for preparation for it will 
 expire with His earlier comin*^ at death, which is, 
 therefore, practically so far as readiness to meet it is 
 concerned, the same as His final appearance In this 
 way our [jord lays the foundation for a perpetual 
 watchfulness, which does not depend for its existence 
 for all generations up to the present and no one 
 knows how long in tho future, upon men being kept 
 in ignorance, and which, if the time of His second 
 coming were made known, could not be exercised. 
 There is a coming of tlie Lord which is always immi- 
 nent for all. At this coming our destiny will be fixed 
 for the grander coming which is to follow. It is little 
 wonder, under these circumstances, if often the inter- 
 vening time which does not bear on our relation to 
 final destiny at the grander coming, should drop out 
 of view, and these two comings be practically treated 
 as one. 
 
 Along this line of interpretation is to be found, we 
 
 
198 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 believe, the solution of the difficulties of this difficult 
 chapter. As all our Lord's exhortations to watchful- 
 ness are contained in this single discourse, delivered 
 by Him to His disciples as He sat on the Mount of 
 Olives, over against the Temple, this explanation, if 
 it suffices for any of them, suffices for all. 
 
 Some pains have thus been taken to present the 
 results of an inductive study of the teaching of the 
 New Testament on the coming of the Lord. All the 
 passages bearing upon the subject have been exam- 
 ined with honest care. The conclusions reached, with 
 as much of the grounds upon which they rest as 
 could be embodied in this condensed treatise, are left 
 with the reader in the hope that they may prove of 
 service in relieving a perplexing subject of some of 
 its difficulties. 
 
 Let it be understood, however, that this subject has 
 not been discussed because it was thought h.ome 
 explanation of this kind must be found or the pre- 
 millennial view accepted. There is no such alternative 
 as this. Our Lord and the scripture writers were either 
 ignorant of the over eighteen hundred years which 
 have passed and the unknown length of years which 
 are still to intervene before He comes, or they were iiot. 
 If the future, during all this great period of years 
 with its crowding events of highest moment for the 
 Church and the world, was so hidden from them that 
 they really thought the Lord's second advent might 
 surprise them with its transcendent events before 
 they died, what right have our pre-millennial friends 
 to assume they must know of the thousand years of 
 
1 
 
 THE EVER-IMMINENT COMING OF OUR LORD. 199 
 
 the millennium, if it were to precede this coming, any 
 more than the other thousand and more, and, per- 
 haps, many thousands of years, which were to pass 
 before He was to return ? But if they did know that 
 a great stretch of years was to pass before the second 
 advent, then, according to our pre-millennial friends 
 who interpret all His references to His coming as of 
 His personal appearing, they must have commanded 
 the believers of their day to watch, etc., lest the com- 
 ing of the Lord should take them unaware, although 
 His second advent was known to be far distant. But 
 if they used these expressions in a sense which would 
 be thus allowable, although one or two, or perhaps 
 many, thousands of years lay between them and the 
 coming in view of which they were to watch, ei^, 
 there then would be no impropriety in using them, 
 although the thousand years of the millennium were 
 to be added to the years which were to precede His 
 advent. So, also, if they declared this coming 
 was at hand, although all this time was to elapse 
 before He was to appear, they might equally have 
 said it was nigh, although the millennium was to be 
 over before His coming. 
 
 This reasoning holds of all the New Testament 
 writings except Revelation ; for in all these there is 
 not the slightest allusion to a millennium. It is only 
 near the end of this last inspired message from God 
 that the single reference to it is found. But Revela- 
 tion is also the one book in which there is a series of 
 visions supposed to cover the whole period from 
 John's time until after the second advent. And yet 
 
 i 
 
 
 :if'.;u;. .< 
 
■•"f^^m 
 
 •''^F 
 
 m 
 
 W 
 
 I ' 
 ii 
 
 > iiW ■ 
 
 200 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 our Lord, in full view of this and also in His exalta- 
 tion above all the limitations of His knowledge as to 
 the time of His reappearing, says, at the close of Rev- 
 elation, "Yea I come quickly." Now, if our Lord 
 used these words of His personal coming, He used 
 them in a sense consistent with the delay of His sec- 
 ond advent for hundreds and, perhaps, thousands of 
 years. Why should they not be consistent, then, in 
 the same sense, although the millennium is to precede 
 His coming ? 
 
 On any imaginable ground that Pre-millennialists 
 may take, therefore, the argument that if the millen- 
 nium were to come before our Lord's second advent, 
 this grand event could not have been spoken of as 
 possibly near, does not hold good. Whatever the 
 reader may think of the view above elaborated, the 
 pre-millennial argument just stated does not hold, 
 and all that has been hitherto advanced on the gen- 
 eral question at issue between Pre-millennialists and 
 Post-millennialists, maintains its full force. 
 
 r 
 
 1 
 
THE POWER OF HIS COMING. 
 
 201 
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 THE POWER OF HIS COMING. 
 
 Our pre- millennial brethren regard their view as 
 necessary to the highest motive power for the Chris- 
 tian life. It is for this reason they esteem it of such 
 supreme importance, and press it with such vigor. 
 It is not the fact and certainty of our Lord's coming 
 so much as its possible immediate nearness, upon 
 which this great power depends. It is only as it is 
 thought each day the glory of His coming may flash 
 across the sky before night, that believers are im- 
 pelled, in full measure, to that attitude of waiting and 
 readiness which is most conducive to growth in char- 
 acter and faithfulness in service. If this be not the 
 great motive of the Christian life itself, it is thought 
 to add intensity to all other motives. The hope of it is 
 the grand inspiration, the supreme joy. It makes love 
 glow and adds fresh ardor to the desire to be holy. It 
 quickens every spiritual energy, and makes labor 
 and sacrifice easy. It arouses missionary enthusiasm, 
 as the work of preaching the Gospel for a witness to 
 all nations is pressed, in order that the glad day for 
 His return may be hastened, by fulfilling its condi- 
 tions. Without the motive power of the thought that 
 
 !• 
 
 •■'11 
 

 202 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOCJV, 
 
 il 
 
 :|i 
 
 our Lord may appear at any moment, many think the 
 Christian life to be powerless and dead. 
 
 There is no dispute but that the personal advent of 
 our Lord is held up in the New Testament as a grand 
 olDJect of Christian anticipation, and as fitted to stir 
 the energies of the new life to activity and faithful- 
 ness. The real question is whether its motive power 
 depends upon the conviction that His advent is pos- 
 sibly near, or upon the assurance, whether near or far 
 away, of its certainty, and that we shall, whether 
 near or far, have our share in all the blessedness of 
 that glad day for the Lord's people. 
 
 If the blessedness of the hope of the Lord's coming 
 and the strength of its motive power, have depended 
 upon its possible immediateness, then, for eighteen 
 centuries, all believers would have had to rest upon 
 what was to prove illusive and, in the end, disappoint- 
 ing, for their chief comfort in affliction and their 
 chief inspiration in labor. Can we believe God 
 intended all these increasing hosts of believers down 
 through the centuries to have as their chief depend- 
 ence for growth in character and faithfulness in life, 
 an expectation which He knew was to prove alto- 
 gether empty and false ? Fur He knew that the time 
 of the Lord's second comiag was not to be possibly 
 near during all this time, but was as Hxed in His plan 
 and purpose as any other event. But our pre-mil- 
 lennial brethren ask us to accept more than this. 
 They would have us believe God to have carefully 
 arranged all things so as to make it possible for this 
 false hope to be maintained throughout the centuries 
 
THE POWER OF HIS COMING. 
 
 203 
 
 since Clirist's departure, and until He may return. 
 To this end our Lord is to come twice aj^ain, once for 
 His people and again with them. For this purpose He 
 seals from His prophets all the history of the Church 
 between Christ's departure and His return for His 
 people.* 
 
 In like manner the history of the nai. ins is a blank 
 to them, until after this coming for His people, 
 although up to the time of Christ's ascension and 
 beyond this coming, there are crowded visions of 
 what is to be. Thus, and in other ways, they would 
 have us think God has planned, in the most skilful 
 way, to keep up the illusion of the ever-continued 
 possible imminence of the Lord's coming, down 
 through the centuries, and thus maintain what He 
 knew was to prove an empty and false expectation 
 as the great hope and motive power of His people. H 
 a father who did not intend to return to his family 
 for, say, ten years, should plan as skilfully to make 
 his wife and children believe he might come back at 
 any moment during this period, be the purpose what 
 it might be, we should consider it deliberate deception 
 — an attempt to make capital out of what was false. 
 We have tried to find some way in which to attrib- 
 ute similar action to God and make it consistent 
 with His righteousness, but have failed, and have 
 given plainly the impression this view makes upon 
 us. The alternative view, which draws motive 
 power and inspiration to growth in grace and fidelity 
 
 * << 
 
 Papers on the Lord's Coming," by C. H. M., pp. 22, 28. 
 
:;f 
 
 204 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 in service from the consideration that the coniinf; of 
 the Lord is certain, and that our lives on earth have 
 as full bearing on that day as though it were to come 
 before our death, is immeasurably superior, because 
 more scriptural, we believe, and more rational, and 
 because it casts no d>'.rk shadow upon the character 
 of God's moral gove anient. 
 
 'Jurnin^ from the moral complexion of the motive 
 from oii ) nrd's personal coming to its strength, we 
 mo than \>ubt whether the view which makes this 
 depe 1 • pon the belief of its possible nearness rather 
 than its positive certainty, has any advantage over 
 the alternative conception. Let it be possible for us 
 to believe that God has so planned the form and sub- 
 stance of His inspired teaching as to give the impres- 
 sion to all, in all the ages, that the second advent of 
 the Lord may come at any moment ; and still, unless 
 we were constituted differently, the power of the 
 motive from the continuous imminence of His coming, 
 in distinction from its certainty, could not maintain 
 itself. So far as the nearness of His coming is to 
 stimulate us, it must be in the hope He may come 
 before our death, to save us from the necessity of 
 dying. If He delay until after we die, it matters 
 little to us whether His coming be in a year or in a 
 thousand years from the day of our burial ; for 
 surely, when we are with Christ, even though disem- 
 bodied, we shall be satisfied to wait God's time for 
 the redemption of our bodies. As soon as a thought- 
 ful man begins to attempt to draw inspiration from 
 the idea that the Lord may come before his death, he is 
 
 . 
 
' 
 
 m 
 
 THE POWER OF TTTS COMING. 
 
 205 
 
 faced by this Tact. The very language of Scripture 
 upon which lie bases tliis hope, is the language whicli 
 was intendetl to give the same hope to tliousands and 
 millions throughout eighteen slow-moving centuries. 
 All these hosts had the same right to expect His coming 
 which he has, and some of them did cherish this liope. 
 And yet, for all these, days grew into weeks and the 
 weeks into years, as middle age succeeded youth and 
 old age drew on apace to those who lived to length of 
 days. While the time grew short, if He were to come 
 before the time for their death, the grand hope which 
 they had made their chief support in trial, and their 
 supreme incentive to fidelity, would either become a 
 frenzy of disappointment, or would fade away, to be 
 replaced by others which had been founded upon 
 something more substantial than "a might be," which 
 was to prove without ground. He cannot but have 
 the thought suggested : if God's inspired message 
 encouraged all the generations from our Lord's ascen- 
 sion to hope for His immediate return, and to make 
 this expectation their chief motive, although eighteen 
 centuries have gone and He has not appeared, why 
 should He not have used the same language, although 
 as many more centuries are to elapse before His 
 people shall greet Him from the skies ? Especially 
 will this be the thought of the intelligent Pre-millen- 
 nialist who holds the most advanced views, that God 
 has revealed nothing of what was to happen from the 
 end of the apostolic age until the second coming of 
 the Lord for His people ; for, if there be nothing 
 revealed which must happen before He comes, equally 
 
 i 
 
 ■ ;.■ ^ "■ 
 
 ■ ■^'44 
 
 t||l;j 
 
 Y9' 
 i 
 
i.l 
 
 200 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOr.Y. 
 
 i 
 
 l! 
 
 t< ■ 
 
 W' 
 
 
 -j\ 
 
 »l 
 
 ill 
 
 tlioro can possibly be iiothin;^ to sbow us when thus 
 coining is near. It is only of the Inter coming with 
 His people that there are signs in the coming to pass 
 of events which are revealed as succeedini: His com- 
 ing for His people. The time from any point in liis- 
 tory, according to this theory, to His coming for His 
 people, being a perfect blank, may be two thousand, 
 or it may be two hundred thousand years. There are 
 no data upon which to form an estimate. At the out- 
 set, then, the man who believes the one great hope 
 ami inspiration of his life is to be in the coming of 
 the Lord before the time for his own death, will find 
 it hard to believe His coming is so probable as to 
 make the hope sufficiently certain to serve so great a 
 purpose. He cannot but feel that as millions have 
 been disappointed who had as good a ground for their 
 hope as he, the balance of probability is unspeakably 
 against his hope being realized, and if he holds to the 
 name of this hope as the great power of his life, he 
 still has lost the reality. 
 
 But even allowing that he can shut his eyes to all 
 this, and that he begins life in the power of this 
 hope, each morning he thinks, " My Lord may come 
 before night," and the hope thrills him. But He does 
 not come. He is inspired by the hope, but to the 
 extent he is thus animated, will he be disappointed 
 when He does not appear. Months grow into years, 
 and every day he hopes, and every day his hope is 
 not realized. In the meantime day by day, he sees 
 funeral processions, and knows men who should be 
 relying upon the hope of Christ's coming before their 
 
 'm 
 
^ 
 
 THE POWER OF iriS foMINO. 
 
 207 
 
 
 tleath as iiiucl) as ]\o, to lu; fooling its icy touch, and 
 tliat this cliorisliod dosiro has oidy, in tho ond, made 
 it Imrdor for thf^n to dio. Can a man possibly, undor 
 all those circiiniatancos and conditions, maintain this 
 hope of the coming of Christ before his death in full 
 strength as an ins{)iration and motive power? It is 
 simply iinpossi])le so to force what is an improbability 
 at the beginning, and which grows more improb- 
 able and disappointing as the years pass, into an 
 expectation (jf sufficient confid(;nce to serve this 
 purpose. The hope, like all that is constrained and 
 unnatural, can at best l)ut be spasmodic. The history 
 of the denomination which has made this hope of our 
 Lord's immediate appearance their great central pecu- 
 liarity and tenet, proves this. It is a record of con- 
 vulsive spasms, rather than an ever-growing life of 
 permanent spiritual power. It is hard to believe that 
 God would have His people depend for their greatest 
 hope and motive power upon what can only be held 
 through their being kept in ignorance, which a 
 knowledge of the facts would make absolutely im- 
 possible, from which, even when kept in ignorance, 
 they can only get inspiration as thoy close their eyes 
 to the nmst overwhelming balance of improbability, 
 which, as actually tested, has proved insufficient to 
 maintain a sustained and high level of impelling force 
 upon Christian life and character, and which, in the 
 end, in all the hosts of believers who shall die in all 
 generations except the last, is to prove as vain as dis- 
 appointing. Is it not more probable that He intended 
 the motive power of the Lord's coming to depend 
 
 f ii 
 
 II 
 
 till 
 
 "* I'* 
 
 ill' 
 
I m 
 
 I 
 
 r: ■ 
 
 i ) 
 
 208 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATULOaV. 
 
 Upon wliut iH certain, upon vvluit r(M|uiroM no condition 
 of i<(nonincn and conccalnH'tit, which loads to no di.s- 
 ap])ointinent, and wliich is (Mjually fitted to move ail 
 ^(inerations and tlu3 vvhoh; term of all livcH with a 
 steady, even impulNc — the fact that our Lord is cer- 
 tainly to come a^ain, the fact that we shall all have 
 our part in what lie comes to brin^j to the class to 
 which we helonjjf, the fact that it is our life before 
 death which determines what that coming is to be 
 for us, the fact that we can therefore wait for His 
 coming as a grand object of expectation, whether it is 
 near or far, and watch, in order to be ready for it, 
 whether before death or ten thousand years lience ? 
 
 It is also to be noticed that in proportion as the 
 imminence of the second advent of our Lord is made 
 the great hope and motive, other hopes and motives 
 drop out of view and lose something of tlieir power. 
 Especially is this true of going to be with Christ at 
 death, which is ever imminent, and must soon come. 
 While our pre- millennial friends rightly protest 
 against confusing tliis with the second and personal 
 coming of the Lord, they also manifest a certain kind 
 of impatience at the thought of any help or inspira- 
 tion coming to the Christian life from this considera- 
 tion. Now, we need not put the death of the Christian 
 and his going to be with Christ in place of the per- 
 sonal coming which is to follow, in order to gain from 
 it motives to earnest work and fidelity. It is evident 
 that each is fitted to give its own distinct and abiding 
 impulse. New Testament writers recognize this. 
 Leaving out of the question the passages referred to 
 
IHE POWEIl OK HIS COMINCl. 
 
 209 
 
 ill the prcciMliii;^ trcutiiioiit as deHcrihin^ a coming of 
 the Lord at doatli, \V(; liavo our Lord liiiiiselt' .sayiiij; 
 to Hi.s<liHci|)leH : " W« must work tlie vvorkH of liiiii 
 that HL'iit 1110, while it is day : the ni^ht cometli when 
 no man can work " (John 9 : 4). Our Lord brings to 
 bear upon His disciples the motive which continually 
 (juickened Hia own energies. The time before the end 
 of life was so short, they must be ever alert to do the 
 work of God. Peter also was moved from the same 
 consideration : " And I think it right, as long as I am 
 in this tabernacle, to stir you up by putting you in 
 remembrance: knowing tliat the putting ott' of my 
 tabernacle cometh swiftly, even as our Lord Jesus 
 Christ signified unto me. Yea, I will give diligence, 
 that at every time ye may be able after my decease to 
 call these things to remembrance" (2 Pet. 1 : 13-15). 
 In 2 Cor. 5 : 9, 10, " Wherefore also we make it our 
 aim, whether at home or absent, to be well-pleasing 
 unto him. For we must all appear before the judg- 
 ment seat of Christ," etc., Paul gathers his motive, not 
 from the possible nearness of the Lord's coming, but 
 the certainty of the judgment which His coming will 
 bring. The man who lives under the consciousness 
 that he must soon depart and be with Christ, and also 
 under the power of the thought that this short and 
 uncertain time will determine what Christ's coming 
 witli all its grand attendant events will be for him, 
 as he shall as certainly have a part in them as though 
 they were to be introduced to-morrow, will not lack 
 the fullest motive power from the consideration of the 
 presence of Christ, and the terrors and splendors of His 
 U 
 
 
 A"' '. 
 
 'V. 
 
 'Ill 
 
ii* 
 
 vH 
 
 S? 
 
 
 
 HI 
 
 iii,,i 
 
 : .1 
 
 i 
 I ■ I 
 
 i 
 
 iiii 
 
 : : 
 
 210 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOI.OGY. 
 
 second comiiipf. There will also l»e no risk of .midden- 
 iii^ liiHappointineiit becau.se that which ha.s ))«M>n made 
 tlie f^reatcHt expectation \h not n;ahzed, and all other 
 niotiveM are also left in full force. Coni[)arinfr the 
 general life of those wlio depend for motive upon 
 what, up to the present, in all the a^es has not been 
 realized, and of those who <lepend only upon what is 
 certain, we do not think th(» balance is in favor of the 
 former. While there have been seasons of unnatural 
 atinnilation, as they have held up before themselves 
 the illusion that tlie liord was just at hand, tlie sea- 
 sons of reaction have been as marked, and the whole 
 life has been of an unhealthy type. In the case of 
 those who hold the doctrine in its more moderate form, 
 it is doubtful whether the motive power from the pos- 
 sible nearness of our Lord's com'.n<^ is really so much 
 as is supposed. Is it not better to become so absorbed 
 in just doing the will of our Lord that the thou<^ht 
 of the time of His coming as it aftects us personally 
 may have less weight ? We know we can please our 
 Lord equally well whether His advent be near or far. 
 
THE I-AST DAY. 
 
 211 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 THK LAST DAY. 
 
 It is jijenorally, if not universally, concodod that 
 the exprcHsion.s " c.iy of judgnunit," " day of tlio Lor«l," 
 " last day," " that day," are all essentially eciuivalent. 
 Throu<(h holdin<» the judgment of the righteous and 
 the wicked to be separated by a long stretch of years, 
 Pre-niillennialists arc required to regard this 'day of 
 judgment," etc., as a great period filled with transcen- 
 dent and diversified events. 
 
 The class of Pre-millennialists who Ijelieve in a 
 coming of Christ for His people and another with 
 them, include in this day (1) The coming of the Lord 
 for His people ; (2) Their resurrection and the rap- 
 ture ; (3) Their judgment and reward; (4) The great 
 tribulation ; (5) The restoration of Israel ; (6) The 
 revelation of Antichrist ; (7) The conversion of the 
 Jews ; (8) The coming of the Lord with His people ; 
 (9) The judgment of the nations ; (10) The destruction 
 of Antichrist; (11) The resurrection of the tribula- 
 tion saints ; (12) The personal reign of Christ for one 
 thousand years; (13) The last great uprising of wick- 
 edness; (14) The resurrection, punishment and judg' 
 ineiit of the wicked ; (15) The last conflagration, 
 
 i 
 
 V'K. 
 
 
 ■|i| 
 
212 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 ■Ji 
 
 
 
 ■ h 
 
 
 
 I 
 
 Tliosu of the Pre-millonnialists who do not coniinit 
 theiiiselvcH to the doctrine of a coming for, and a com- 
 ing with, His people, believe this "day" to include 1,2,3, 
 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 of the above. Post-niillennial- 
 ists believe this day includes the coming of the Lord, 
 the resurrection of good and bad, the judgment of all, 
 their reward and punishments respectively, and the 
 last conflagration. Let us refer to all the passages in 
 which these terms are used, and see whether there 
 is any allusion in thtm to the restoration and con- 
 version of the Jews, the personal reign of Christ over 
 a holy people upon the earth, a great uprising of the 
 wicked and their attack upon the saints while He is 
 with them in personal presence and power, which all 
 classes of Pre-millennialists believe included in that 
 day. Almost all believe, also, that during the millen- 
 nial part of this " day," the work of salvation which 
 has made little progress prior to our Lord's coming, 
 will then, in connection with the labors of the Jews 
 who are to be converted at its beginning, sweep over 
 the earth in glorious might, until all men are brought 
 to the feet of Jesus in devoted subjection and adoring 
 love. 
 
 But what do the Scriptures say that day contains ? 
 
 The dead are to be raised on that " last day " (John 
 6:39, 40, 44,54; 11:24). 
 
 That day shall be the great day of searching judg- 
 ment. Men shall be then judged by the word of 
 Christ (John 12 : 48), the Gospel of Christ (Rom. 2 : 16), 
 must give account for every idle word (Matt. 12 : 3G), 
 will have the emptiness of mere formal service exposed 
 
IIWll I 
 
 ■n 
 
 THE LAST DAY. 
 
 213 
 
 (Matt. 7 : 22), and tlie character of their service 
 revealed (I Cor. 3 : 13). 
 
 In the testing of the searcliing judgment of this 
 day, the wicked shall be declared guilty and shall be 
 punished. 
 
 Those wlio reject the preaching of the apostles shall 
 be under deeper condemnation and penalty than Sodom 
 and Gomorrah (Matt. 10 : 15; Luke 10 : 15), Capernaum 
 than Sodom (Matt. 11 : 22), Chorazin and Bethsaida 
 than Tyre and Sidon (Matt. 11 : 21). The wicked are 
 kept " under punishment unto the day of judgment" 
 (2 Pet. 2: 9). That day is to be the day of "destruc- 
 tion of ungodly men " (2 Pet. 3 : 7). Evil angels are 
 kept unto the judgment of this " great day " ( Jude 6). 
 Because on this day, the doom of the wicked is made 
 manifest and God's righteous displeasure against sin 
 it is called the " day of wrath " (Rom. 2 : 5). 
 
 In that day of searching judgment, the faithful 
 shall be " unreproveable " (1 Cor. 1: 8), "void of 
 offence " (Phil 1 : 10), " have boldness " (1 John 4:17), 
 "have whereof to glory" (Phil 2: 16), "receive a 
 crown of righteousness" (2 Tim. 4 : 8), "find mercy" 
 (2 Tim. 1 : 18), glory in those saved through them 
 (2 Cor. 1 : 14), Christ is then to be glorified in His 
 saints (2 Thess. 1 : 10). 
 
 In that day, there is to be the great conflagration 
 spoken of in 2 Pet. 3 : 10 sq. 
 
 The only other passages in which any of these, 
 expressions is used, are 1 Cor. o : 5, Phil. 1 : 6, 1 Thess. 
 5 : 2-4, 2 Thess. 2 : 2, 2 Tim. 1:12, Heb. 10 : 25, which 
 
 11^ 
 
 i.. 
 
' 'mi' 
 
 ii » 
 
 214 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY, 
 
 i ■ 
 
 j 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 i ' h 
 
 1 
 
 tell us nothing on the question at issue between Prc- 
 miilennialists and Post-rnillennialists. 
 
 So far as these declared descriptions of this day, so 
 variously designed, specify, it includes just four things 
 — the coming of the Lord, the resurrection of the 
 dead, the judgment of the righteous and the wicked 
 with the condenniation and penalty and the justifica- 
 tion and reward associated with it, and the great con- 
 flagration of 2 Peter, which some reverent interpreters 
 do not take literally. There is not the shadow of a 
 shade of a hint that this day includes the restoration 
 of the Jews and their conversion, the great era of the 
 progress and triumph of the Gospel, the personal 
 reign of Christ on earth, and a great rebellion of the 
 wicked in the very face of the omnipotent Saviour 
 in personal presence, and after a thousand years of 
 the display of His invincible might. 
 
 If this day is really to include this long and grand 
 series of events, how is it that not the remotest refer- 
 ence or allusion to any one of them is found in a single 
 one of the numerous and varied descriptions of it ? 
 Could our Lord and the apostles have believed this 
 day was to include them all and still have kept out 
 the most incidental allusion to them from all their 
 references to it ? Where might we more expect to 
 find references to these events than in the descriptions 
 of what is alleged to be the period of which they 
 form some of the grandest features ? If the descrip- 
 tions of this day were few, or these events which Pre- 
 millennialists would thrust into it, of an insignificant 
 character, it would be conceivable that they might 
 
THE LAST DAY. 
 
 215 
 
 make part of this daj'^, though not mentioned in the 
 Hcant reference to even its more transcendent features; 
 but where the descriptions of this day and the aUu- 
 sions to it are so many and varied, and these events 
 wliich are alleijed to be included in it are so <rrand and 
 blessed, can we reach any other conclusion than that 
 they are not mentioned in the descriptions of the day, 
 simply because they do not belong to it? 
 
 Besides,the whole impression made by an exhaustive 
 study of all the passages in which the " day of judg- 
 ment " and its kindred terms are used, is just the 
 opposite of its being a long period. This day bursts 
 upon the world with lightning-like suddenness. It 
 comes like the stroke of doom to all the wicked. All 
 arms opposed to Christ are palsied by the glory, and 
 grandeur, and divine might of the personally-present 
 Judge. No puny arm of rebellion will ever be lifted 
 after He appears in transcendent majesty. There 
 is no long and gracious period in which Christ's lov- 
 ing calls continue to woo the wicked, and draw multi- 
 tudes into the kingdom, as never before. There are 
 no long centuries of blessed life on earth in this "day." 
 It is to be as swift in its progress as sudden in its 
 coming. Its tremendous events crowd each other 
 across the scene. They are all homogeneous, having 
 their centre and unity in the judgment seat of Christ, 
 His coming and the resurrection as preparatory to it, 
 and the reward and penalty as consequent upon it. 
 
 While, therefore, we must not restrict *'^. day" to 
 twenty- four hours, it does appear that thv ^^ersistent 
 and invariable use of this brief natural period to 
 
 ' *tc 
 
mmmmm 
 
 if 
 
 
 .lil! 
 
 iHlMj;'; 
 
 
 '1 i 
 
 '■ ' '■ ; 
 
 II 
 
 ; : ;, 1 [ 
 
 216 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOV. 
 
 describe the era of these grand events, was intended 
 to impress upon us its relative brevity — that it is to 
 be too sliort to include a millennium of years with 
 the addition of an indefinite period, as Pre-millennial- 
 ists believe 
 
 Nor is this all. Notice the significance of the fact 
 that this day is called " the last day " as well as " the 
 day of the Lord " and " the day of judgment." 
 Reference is made to the same period, as the end of 
 the world, or age, in Matt. 13: 39, 40, 49; 24:3; 
 28 : 20, where the same great events, the judgment 
 separation, the coming of the Lord, and the end of 
 the gospel age, are spoken of. John uniformly calls 
 this period " the last day," Matthew "the day of judg- 
 ment " and " the' end of the world " or age, Paul " that 
 day " or " the day of the Lord," Peter " the day of 
 judgment " and "the day of God." Its designation 
 as " the last day," and " the end of the world " or age, 
 fixes its relative place in time. So far as we know, 
 there is no dispute, either that all these designations 
 refer to the same period, or that the age of which it is 
 " the last day," or " end," is the present gospel age, 
 which is to close with the coming of the Lord, as dis- 
 tinguished from the age to come which then sets in. 
 Pre-millennialists, believing not only that the age to 
 come is introduced by the coming of the Lord, but 
 that He will come to introduce the millennium, hold 
 that the millennium forms part of the age to come. 
 
 It does not require much penetration to see the 
 contradictions and inconsistencies which the pre- 
 millennial conception of " the day of judgment " or 
 
^p 
 
 THE LAST DAY. 
 
 217 
 
 t I 
 
 " last day," involves, wh(3n brought face to face with 
 tlieir belief that the inillenniiiin forms part of the 
 atje to come — nay, constitutes that age. Unquestion- 
 ably, "the clay of judgment," which is also termed " the 
 last day," includes the judgment of the wicked, as well 
 as the coming of the Lord and the judgment of the 
 righteous. But Pre-millennialists all hold that the 
 judgment of the wicked is not until after the millen- 
 nium has been succeeded by the great uprising of 
 wickedness at its close (Rev. 20 : 11 .sr/.). They, 
 therefore, make the day of judgment, which is also 
 described as the last day, include all the millennium, 
 with all the events they believe will then take place. 
 That is to say, the last day or end of this evil age, as 
 distinguished from the glorious millennial age which 
 is to follow, includes all this very age to come and 
 perhaps more ! What would we say of the man 
 who should declare that the last day, or end of the 
 nineteenth century is to include all the twentieth 
 century with all its crowding events ? 
 
 What shall we say of the theory wdiich makes it 
 necessary to suppose our Lord and His apostles guilty, 
 in their use of language, of folly just as great ? 
 
 If anything is plain, it is that these ages stretch over 
 different periods of time. No event, therefore, of the 
 one can occur in the temporal limits of the other, any 
 more than an object can be in two places at the same 
 time. In any case, can we conceive scripture writers 
 to be so unmindful of the properties of language as to 
 designate as a day of an age a period longer than the 
 one they call an age ? It will also be noticed that the 
 
 H<- ■ 
 
 t 
 
 % 
 
 5 
 I 
 
 i 1 
 
 \ u 
 
 
218 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOOY. 
 
 li? / 
 
 
 t;'4' 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 III 
 
 
 i 
 
 pro-inilleniiial view makes tl.J resurrection and judg- 
 ment of the righteous and of the wicked occur in 
 two distinct ages, the wicked being raised and judged 
 in the age or workl to come. 
 
 Does not all the plain teaching of the Now Testa- 
 ment give the opposite impression ? In this case, 
 especially, we do not see how it is possible to force 
 the pre-millennial interpretation of Rev. 20: 4-11 
 upon the rest of tlie New Testament without bringing 
 these verses into such flat contradiction with the 
 teaching of the passages which refer to the day 
 variously designated " the last day," " the day of 
 judgment," etc., as to endanger the inspiration of 
 either Rev. 20: 4-11, or of all the passages with 
 which it is brought into conflict. Will anyone venture 
 to assume, in order to escape the difficulty, that " the 
 day of judgment," " the day of the Lord," etc., do not 
 refer to the same period as that covered by " the last 
 day " ? But this would require great hardihood. It 
 would be necessary to maintain that " the day of 
 judgment" and "the last day" were not the same 
 period, although the same grand events are said to 
 take place in them both. It would also require him 
 to defy the consensus of Christian scholarship.* 
 
 Or will anyone say that the millennial age belongs 
 to the present age as distinguished from the age to 
 come ? But this would be to give up the central 
 doctrine of Pre-millennialism, and take the heart out 
 
 * E.g., see Crenier, Thayer, Robinson, " Lex. New Test. Greek," 
 art. day {I'/fiepa). 
 
tup: last day. 
 
 219 
 
 of that vvliole system. Shall wc thon conclude that 
 our Lord and His apostles used language with no more 
 discrimination and propriety than to include in the last 
 day of this aj]je nuich if not all, of the age to come, 
 from which, apparently, this term " last day " of this 
 aije was meant to distin«niish it ? There seems to be 
 but one alternative to all these assumptions ; and that 
 is, to conclude that the theory which puts the millen- 
 nium and the jud^^nnent of the wicked beyond the 
 coming of the Lord in an age to come, as distinguished 
 from the present age, is untenable, and must be 
 abandoned in order to escape impossible conclusions. 
 
 
 
 r' it 
 
' 
 
 r liii^ 
 
 220 
 
 A STUDY IN ESC HATO LOGY, 
 
 111 
 
 -{| 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 THE PROGRESS OF THE GOSPEL. 
 
 There is another issue between Pre-millennialists 
 and Post-millennialists, namely, that in reference to 
 the profijress and outcome of the gospel dispensation. 
 
 Pre-millennialists teach that the preaching of the 
 Gospel, even with the co-operating power of the 
 omnipotent Spirit of God, was never designed to be 
 the divine means by which the mass of mankind 
 should be brought to the feet of Jesus. Instead of 
 the world being gradually subdued by divine grace 
 and power through the Gospel, and the millennium 
 being ushered in as the grand climax of a progress 
 which, though often halting, has been maintained, 
 the miixht of evil is to go on witherinjj force and 
 intensity, until it reaches its climax, and then Christ 
 will come to smite down its reign. The object of the 
 preaching of the Gospel and the work of the Spirit is 
 only for a witness against a world becoming more 
 and more opposed to Christ, and to gather out an 
 elect few. 
 
 In opposition to this, Post-millennialists hold that 
 the preaching of the Gospel, in the power of the Holy 
 Spirit, is the one and the only means designed by 
 
 I n 
 
 '■*'! 
 
TIIK IMKXillKSS OF IIIK (JOSI'EF.. 
 
 221 
 
 (J(m1 to l)riiij^ a lost race to salvation. They believe 
 that the (jloHpel, iiotvvithstan<liii<; reactions, has nia<le 
 prot^resH, and is to continue to advance. A time is to 
 come when, throuijfh this pro«jress, and, perhaps, 
 some nu<(lity and special energizing of divine power 
 in connection with the work of the Church, the 
 millennial era of rightc.'ousness and peace is to <lawn 
 upon a weary world. Through this halcyon time, 
 goodness, and truth, and holiness are to prevail as 
 never before. At the close, the elements of evil 
 which existed during this period will again assert 
 themselves, and in the hist desperate struggle against 
 the power of the Gospel will be smitten down forever 
 by the descending Judge of (piick and dead, as He 
 comes to end this age, and usher in the ages of 
 eternity. 
 
 The question is, which of these views is the scrip- 
 tural one ? Is it the teaching of the Bible that the 
 Gospel, in the accompanying power o? the Holy 
 Ghost, is God's one means for the salvation of all 
 who are to be saved ; or are we to expect the great 
 era of salvation to be in another age, under changed 
 conditions, through the personal presence of Christ ? 
 Does the Bible say that the shadow of sin is to grow 
 darker and darker over the earth from the time 
 Christ came the first time until He is to return ? Or 
 does it justify a more hopeful view ? 
 
 First, then, what do the Scriptures teach us as to 
 God's purpose through the Gospel with the accom- 
 panying power of the Holy Spirit ? Naturally, we 
 first turn to the great commission. This was our Lord's 
 
' 
 
 1 ^ 
 
 f 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 t 
 
 ; 
 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 i:, 
 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 ' 
 
 222 
 
 A STUDY IX ESCHATOLOGV. 
 
 last {^oiiorul nio.s.sjij^e for His prople down tlirout^l. the 
 ji^^es. We iiii;^lit well exptrt liore, il' aiiyvvluTc, to 
 find our Lord's own statonient of tho «^reat purpose of 
 the service of His people through the Gospel. Let 
 us study the pregnant words of Matt. 28: 18-20: 
 " All authority hath been given nie in heaven and 
 earth. Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the 
 nations, baptizing tlieni in the name of the Father, 
 and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them 
 to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you : 
 and lo, I am w^th you alway, even unto the end of 
 the world." 
 
 Does " make disciples of all the nations " mean that 
 the servants of Christ, as they go forth in obedience 
 to His last injunction, can hope for nothing more, as 
 the ultimate results of their work, than that an elect 
 few shall be gathered out of the nations until the end of 
 the world ? Does it not rather mean that the work of 
 evangelization is to go on until a day shall come, 
 when practically, aujd in a general sense, " all the 
 nations" shall become disciples of our Lord ? If this 
 be not so, then can we escape the conclusion that our 
 Lord commanded His people to do sometliing which 
 He never intended or proposed should be done ? The 
 words "make disciples," "teaching to observe all 
 things whatsoever I commanded,' cover all of sal- 
 vation, and exhaust all the provisions of the Gospel 
 for the souls of men, and " all the nations " leaves 
 none out. What is here commanded, therefore, omits 
 nothing from its all-inclusive scope of God's purpose 
 as to human salvation in the present life. Pare we 
 
THE PUOailESH OF THE fJOSPEL. 
 
 223 
 
 asHuiiu' that it was not Ili.s purpo.st; that what our 
 JiOnI hen; coiniuandod .should l»o done in the souHr in 
 wliicli it was enjoined ? It was our Lord's purpose, 
 then, that His servants sliould never consider tlieir 
 work done until tlie wori<l sliould be brought to His 
 feet through the efficacy of His work and through 
 His power. The (luestion still renmina as to the 
 period in which this great design of His, as indicated 
 by His charge, should be fulfilled. And is not this 
 also clearly made known in the introductory and 
 concluding words of this same all-embracing passage, 
 " All authority hath been given me in heaven and 
 earth. Go ye therefore," and " Lo, I am with you 
 alway, even unto the end of the world " or age ? It 
 is His presence with them, in the all-embracing 
 authority vvhicli has already been bestowed upon 
 Him, that is the ground upon which God's people are 
 commissioned to accomplish so mighty a task. He is 
 to be with them, in this capacity of their all-sufficient 
 helper, until tlie end of the age, or until His second 
 personal coming to end the age. 
 
 Can there be the shadow of a doubt that this means 
 He is to be with them as long as the work of discip- 
 ling is to be continued ? It is a promise to encourage 
 them in their special work, during all ages, and is 
 therefore an assurance of His presence until this work 
 is done. When He says, "I am with you alway, even 
 unto the end of the age," He declares that this w^ork 
 is to continue till then, and then it is to end. There 
 seems to be no possible room left for the idea that 
 the chief part of the work of discipling was not to 
 

 I ilHll.lil ! 
 
 m 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 l\ 
 
 ;' '' 
 
 J.J 
 
 224 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATULOOY. 
 
 iiiko place uiilil aftrr tlir end of tlie a^e in wliicli lie 
 lia<l |)r()ini,sr<l to he with tln'iii lor the purpoHt; of 
 hel[)'mj; thciii in this very work. Neitlier can wo 
 think that the cliief part of this work was not to be 
 (lone throu;;h tlie power He luul already received 
 from (jo<1, and which was to be nianifeHted throu«^h 
 the pn.'Htince of tlu; Spirit of Christ, as the passaji^e 
 plaiidy intimates ; but was to be accomplished in a 
 nvw a^e, and in the exercise of another form of 
 power — that of His personal presence, rather than of 
 His Spirit, through whom He is present with His 
 people in the sense here in(licate<l. The <^reat com- 
 mission covers all Ood's purpose of grace to men on 
 earth through the redemptive work of Christ, and 
 this is all to be accomplished through the agency of 
 God's people, before the end of this age, in the present 
 dispensation of the Spirit. Any millennium, there- 
 fore, there is to be, must be within the scope of the 
 great commission, and lie within the limits of the 
 present age. Other passages contain the same 
 teaching. 
 
 Acts 5 :31, "Him did God exalt with his right hand 
 to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to 
 Israel and remission of sins." Peter had not yet been 
 led out beyond his Jewish exclusiveness. He only 
 mentions Israel, but the object of our Lord's exalta- 
 tion was equally to give repentance and remission to 
 all men. Just as in the great commission, our Lord 
 says — "all authority" is given to Him, here Peter 
 declares He has already taken His exalted seat of 
 power as the dispenser of repentance and remission. 
 

 THK IMKKIHKSS ^>V TIIK (JOSPKI.. 
 
 226 
 
 It is while tliUH rxaltt'd, and rioiii tljo .scat whicli llo 
 now oct'Upii'H, that tlicsi^ .s<)v«M't'i^n powers aiv to he 
 diMpunHod to iiu^n. While l'et(!r does i»ot declare tliat 
 it Ih oidy Croiii His present mediatorial tlirone tliis will 
 be d()n»3, the laii^^'ua^e is altogether out of haniiony 
 with the thought that hut little, comparatively, of the 
 di.spensin;^ of repentance ami pardon will be done 
 until ll(^ has left His place at (lod's ri<;ht hand. It is 
 in the strictest aj^retiment with the belief tliat all the 
 dispensing of His <^race will be done before He leaves 
 this seat, and when Ho does leave it, human proba- 
 tion is at an end. 
 
 In this connection, we must refer a^ain to Hob. 
 10 : 12, 13, " But he, when he had offered one sacrifice 
 for sins forever, sat down on the rit(ht hand of (iod, 
 from henceforth expectini^ till his enemies be made 
 the footstool of his feet." 
 
 This passaj^e is in strictest harmony with Acts 5: 131, 
 just considered. Our Lord, after ottering himself on 
 the cross as the one sacrifice for sins, sat down at 
 God's right hand as Prince and Saviour, to dispense 
 repentance and forgiveness. From the time that He 
 takes this exalted seat of power, He expects or awaits, 
 as the word really means, until, through the progress 
 of this work of repentance and forgiveness which 
 continues in connection with the preaching of the 
 Gospel, His enemies shall finally become subject to His 
 sway. If we say that this passage refers to the 
 crushing of His enemies by omnipotent power, rather 
 than subduing their hearts by the power of the 
 Gospel, we have to suppose the writer of Hebrews, in 
 15 
 
 
226 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 ii! 
 
 m 
 
 l)i 
 
 Hiiji 
 
 i" I 
 
 I 
 
 referring to the outcome of Christ's sacrificial work, 
 as He " had offered one sacrifice of sins forever," and 
 sat down on the right liand of God expectin<^ the 
 outcome, really thought it nothing more than the 
 crushing, by His avenging might, those who continue 
 to hate Him. Surely, if this were the kind of con- 
 quest He was seeking He need not have died to make 
 it possible. Nay, the subjection here spoken of is of 
 men's hearts by grace, not a crushing by might. After 
 having accomplished the w'ork of redemption for 
 men He sat down, expecting — that is, from His seat 
 at the right hand of God He continues to expect — 
 until His expectation shall be realized in His enemies 
 being made the footstool of His feet — until the 
 Gospel has completed its work and had its full 
 triumph. 
 
 As an example of attempts to harmonize this passage 
 with pre-millennial views, we quote from Faussett, 
 " Commentary," in loco : " He is now sitting at rest, 
 V. 12, invisibly reigning and having his foes virtually, 
 by virtue of his death, subject to him. His present 
 sitting on the unseen throne is a necessary prelimi- 
 nary to his coming forth to subject his foes openly. 
 He shall then come forth to a visible manifested 
 Kingdom and conquest of his foes," etc. Is it neces- 
 sary to say that the subjection He sat expecting was 
 not one He virtually had. To expect what we already 
 have is a misuse of language. He was to sit until 
 the " virtual subjection," whatever that may mean, 
 became actual. While we must not press too far the 
 figurative expressions, " sat down at the right hand 
 
 ,f 
 
THE PROGRESS OF THE fJOSPEL. 
 
 227 
 
 of God," " the footstool of his feet," the passage can- 
 not mean less than that His enemies are suV)jected 
 under Him, while exercisin«r the sway, which He 
 assumed when He ascended to the Father. The full 
 results of the atoning work He accomplished, when 
 He offered one sacrifice for sins forever, are finished 
 before He leaves the seat "on the right hand of God." 
 When He leaves that seat, it will not be to save, but 
 to judge men, and give eternal rewards to His people 
 and punishment to His enemies. 
 
 If more evidence to the same effect is needed, we 
 refer the reader to Acts 2:34-36, and all the passages 
 to prove that there is no probation or salvation after 
 Christ comes, as given in chap. 4, where the same 
 teaching, in the most explicit form, is found. 
 
 In opposition to all this, and in support of their 
 gloomy view, Pre-millennialists rely chiefly upon two 
 passages. 
 
 The first is Matt. 24: 14: "And this gospel of the 
 kingdom shall be preached in the whole world for a 
 testimony unto all nations, and then shall the end 
 come." If the " end " here spoken of is the end of the 
 world, at our Lord's second coming, then, during all 
 the ages in which myriads had never heard the 
 Gospel, it was impossible to believe this end or second 
 advent might surprise tlie world at any moment. 
 The event could not happen before its necessary con- 
 dition was fulfilled. 
 
 To reconcile this passage with the belief in the per- 
 petual imminence of our Lord's coming, some Pre- 
 millennialists regard the " end " referred to as the 
 
228 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOI^OGV. 
 
 I 1 
 
 ' ^1'^ 
 
 
 
 f ' ■ 
 
 ■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 : 
 
 : 
 
 
 
 ' \ ' 
 
 
 
 
 ^^1 
 
 |B 
 
 
 ' ','' 
 
 H 
 
 1 
 
 "■: 
 
 
 
 
 Imh 
 
 if 
 
 ii' .1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 '1 
 
 ; 
 
 1 
 
 1' 
 
 end of the "travail" spoken of in v. 8, and wliich cul- 
 minated at the destruction of Jerusaleni. (See Meyer, 
 Alford, etc.) In that case tliis passage has no neces- 
 sary bearing on the general purpose of the Gospel 
 in all the subse(i[uent ages. 
 
 But if this verse does refer to the general purpose 
 of the Gospel in all ages, it can support tlie view 
 that few will be saved through its proclamation, only 
 as preaching for a testimony is for some other purpose 
 than to save men. This is what Pre-millennialists 
 believe. The chief purpose of this preaching is held 
 to be to make it possible for God justly to condemn 
 men, rather than to save them. It is, therefore, inferred 
 that condemnation and not salvation will be the chief 
 end served by the Gospel up to the end, when Christ 
 
 comes again. 
 
 But is this the true explanation of the expression, 
 " preaching for a testimony " ? Cremer, than whom 
 there is scarcely a higher authority, after a com- 
 parison of all the places where " for a testimony " 
 occurs, concludes that the preaching for a witness 
 signifies the proclamation of the New Testament 
 facts to men " that they may thus hear of Christ the 
 Messiah," Even Dr. Pierson ("The Coming of the 
 Lord," p. 34), in speaking of the witnessing of the 
 Church, says : " This witnessing includes everything 
 that tends to put before human souls the grandeur, 
 dignity and power of Christ as Saviour and Lord." It 
 is not for a testimony against any, except as they 
 reject Christ about whom the testimony is given. 
 There is nothing in the expression itself to determine 
 
■ 
 
 THE iMiorjiu:ss of the gospel. 
 
 229 
 
 ihing 
 deur, 
 It 
 they 
 ;iven. 
 mine 
 
 whether the testimony thus giv<'n by tlie Gospel is 
 for condemnation or salvation. It covers the immedi- 
 ate object of the preaching of the Gospel — to make 
 known, or to testify to, if you will — the facts and 
 truths about Christ. It is a making known of Christ 
 in His true relation to human salvation. Whether 
 this will result in condemnation or salvation is not 
 declared. It leaves room for either the salvation or 
 the condemnation of the great bulk of mankind. 
 
 At the same time, the view which would make the 
 great purpose of the preaching of the Gospel to be as 
 a witness against men to assure their righteous con- 
 demnation, is inconsistent with the very meaning of 
 the word " gospel " — "glad tidings' — and with such 
 passages as John 3:17: " For God .sent not his Son 
 into the world to judge the world, but that the world 
 should be saved through him." His coming and the 
 preaching of the Gospel, like all things else which are 
 provided in mercy, if rejected, results in deeper con- 
 demnation ; but the Gospel is sent forth with a view 
 to salvation. The condemnation comes throui{h the 
 refusal of men to yield to God's manifest intent. 
 
 The other passage relied on by Pre-millennialists in 
 support of their pessimistic vievv^s of the object of the 
 preaching of the Gospel in the | .ent dispensation, is 
 Acts 15 : 14 : ■ Brathren, hearke. ^into me : Symeon 
 hath rehear.sed how first God did visit the Gentiles, to 
 take out of them a people for his name." 
 
 Very large use is made of this verse. In tracts and 
 from pulpits we often see and hear it said, " God did 
 visit the Gentiles, not to save them all, but to take 
 
 n 
 
"Ti-- T™^^^»" 
 
 ^ *1l!*t 
 
 -^i^ 
 
 230 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLO(JY. 
 
 out of them an elect few, to be a people for his 
 name." This verse is thought an all-sufficient proof 
 of their gloomy views of the future work of the 
 Church. It does not require much thought to per- 
 ceive how little this verse avails to this end. 
 
 James is referring to the specified instance which 
 Peter had rehearsed — the conversion of Cornelius 
 and his household (see vs. 7-9 and compare Acts 
 10 : 44). It is more than probable that James, when 
 he said, " God did first visit the Gentiles to take out 
 of them a people for his name," referred only to the 
 Gentile converts already gathered into the churches. 
 These already constituted a people for God's name. 
 
 But if the general purpose in the preaching of the 
 Gospel to the Gentiles is here declared, it is in nowise 
 in conflict with the belief that a long period is yet to 
 come, in which the great mass of the Gentiles shall 
 be converted. The expression must refer, in this 
 case, to the purpose and result of the preaching of the 
 Gospel throughout the ages to the end. For ages past 
 but comparatively few of the Gentiles have been saved. 
 We do not know how long this shall continue to be 
 true. Even though the great body of the Gentiles 
 continue to be converted for a thousand years before 
 the end, still, of all the innumerable myriads who 
 shall have lived during the Christian era, those of 
 them who are saved would be a people taken out of 
 this vast mass. The expression, " To take out of the 
 Gentiles a people for his name," does not necessarily 
 imply that those " taken out " are but a small pro- 
 portion of the whole number. So long as all do not 
 
 f'^ 
 
^m 
 
 THE PltOGRESS OF THE GOSPEL. 
 
 231 
 
 become the people of the Lord, it is hard to see how 
 any other form of hm^uage could be used. If nine- 
 tenths or ninety-nine one-hundredths were to be 
 chosen by God, it would still be tjiking them out 
 from the whole number of the Gentiles. But the 
 evident meaning of the whole passage (Acts 15 : 14-19) 
 makes plain, not only that it gives no aid to the 
 pessimistic view of our pre-millennial brethren as to 
 the outcome of the gospel dispensation, but that it is 
 all aglow with the most radiant promise. In vs. 16, 17 
 James proceeds to show that this " taking out of the 
 Gentiles a people for his name " is in harmony with 
 Old Testament prophecy, and quotes Amos 9:11, 12, in 
 a free way from the Septuagint, in proof, where " all 
 the Gentiles upon whom my name is called " are 
 spoken of as seeking the Lord. Now, if the statement 
 of James in v. 14 — " taking out of the Gentiles a peo- 
 ple for his name " — included only the gathering out 
 from the Gentiles a very few converts in the time pre- 
 ceding the second advent, while the prophecy refers 
 exclusively to the gathering in of all the Gentiles 
 after that grand event, as pre-millennial controversial- 
 ists declare, then the prophecy does not even include 
 the first reception of the Gentiles into the blessings 
 of the gospel dispensation ; it is not pertinent to the 
 matter before the Council, and the apostle seems 
 guilty of a misapplication of prophecy. It is only as 
 the prophecy includes the very gathering " out of the 
 Gentiles a people for his name," of which James 
 speaks, that there can be the agreement between 
 them which would justify the reference to the pro- 
 
232 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOaY. 
 
 ! 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 ' 
 
 
 i 
 
 phecy in support of what had been clone, or what it 
 was proposed to do. It would be strange consist- 
 ency, also, for James to quote in support of a state- 
 ment that only a few Gentiles were to be saved in the 
 Christian dispensation, a prophecy which declares 
 the salvation of them all. Notice, also, the similarity 
 of James's language, '• a people for his name," and that 
 of the prophecy, " the Gentiles upon whom my name 
 is called." 
 
 For this reason, all commentators we have been 
 able to consult on this passage,* including Meyer, 
 Wordsworth, Canon Cook, Plumptre, Lechler in Lange, 
 SchafF, A. R. Faussett, Olshausen, Cambridge Bible, 
 Abbott, Howson & Spence, Hackett, and Alford, inter- 
 pret the prophecy quoted as referring to the recep- 
 tion of the Gentiles to the Gospel, and their subse- 
 quent salvation and gathering into Christ's spiritual 
 kingdom in the present dispensation. As Meyer says : 
 " The prophecy has found its Messianic historical 
 fulfilment in the reception of the Gentiles unto 
 Christianity, after that thereby the Davidic dominion, 
 in the higher and antitypical sense of the Son of 
 David, was re-established." Bishop Wordsworth ex- 
 plains, Amos declares in these words, " that the true 
 restoration of the tabernacle of David is to be found m 
 the reception of the residue of the human family, and 
 in the flowing in of all nations, into the Church of 
 Christ." They all associate this prophecy with our 
 Lord's first coming, and make the building again of the 
 tabernacle of David refer to what was to follow this 
 
 * "Commentary," in loco. 
 
^fm 
 
 THK IM{<Kil{KSS OF THE (;()SI'EF.. 
 
 2.s:i 
 
 coming of David's greater Son. James seems to think 
 this propliecy covered all the divine purpose of this 
 first coming in reference to the salvation of the Gen- 
 tiles. He sees the beginning of the realization of 
 that purpose in the gathering in of the Gentiles, 
 which had already taken place. He saw, in this 
 prophecy, the assurance it was still to go on, in the 
 same dispensation, until " the residue of men may 
 seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles upon whom 
 my name is called." Can this mean anything else 
 than that the conversion of the Gentiles, which had 
 already taken place, was to go on until all the Gen- 
 tiles who were to be saved should be saved ?* 
 
 A reference to Rom. 11 : 25 supports this interpreta- 
 tion, if it needs any support. " Hardness in part hath 
 befallen Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be 
 come in." Pre-millennialists refer the fulfilment of 
 this prophecy to the time preceding the second com- 
 ing. They are therefore recjuired, in order to har- 
 monize this statement with their view that but few 
 
 I 
 
 * Since writing the above my attention has been called to the 
 views of Dr. .Stifler. He thinks James's address was to sootlie the 
 Pharisees, not to support Peter in silencing them. "James pro- 
 posed to show that all scripture which the Pharisees might cite in 
 lavor of Jewish superiority and supremacy was relevant, but not 
 relevant at this time, nor relevant in the state of tilings which 
 God's spirit had now surely brought about, j)utting Jew and Gen- 
 tile on the same level." The Old Testament, according to Dr. Stifler, 
 makes no reference to the church period, and the passage James 
 quotes must refer to the millennial era after the church period has 
 been brought to a close by the coming of the Lord. Dr. Stitler's 
 attempt to reconcile James's address and ([uotation with the pre- 
 millennial view is ingenious ; at the same time, I have no doubt, 
 James's hearers thought Amos 9 : 11, 12, relevant at that time and 
 under the circumstances then existing. His view and argument, 
 also, are based upon the belief that the Christian dispensation was 
 a hiatus in Old Testament prophecy, which is hard to believe. 
 
"ftfrnmrn 
 
 11; 
 
 M 
 
 liiiMII '^^1 
 
 7 A STUDY IN EbCHATOLUtSY. 
 
 jiparatively are to bo saved before Clirist comes 
 .i^aiii, to make it appear that " fulness " liere does not 
 mean the great body of Gentiles, but the full ap- 
 pointed number of the Gentiles. But allow that this 
 is the meaning of "fulness" here, does it even then leave 
 their interpretation free from insuperable ditficulty ? 
 To say that it signifies the full appointed number who 
 are to be saved before " all Israel shall be saved," 
 would be to make Paul here state a meaningless 
 truism. He would just declare that all the Gentiles 
 who were to be saved before all Israel shall be saved, 
 should be saved before all Israel shall be saved, which 
 it did not require an inspired man to declare, and 
 which a man of the most ordinary wisdom would not 
 take the trouble to say. If " fulness " here does not 
 mean the great body of the Gentiles, it must mean the 
 full number of the Gentiles who are ever to be saved. 
 But this is just what our pre-millennial friends deny ; 
 for they hold that the prophecy is to be fulfilled be- 
 fore the second advent, whereas the great bulk of the 
 Gentiles are not to be saved until after that event. 
 If " fulness " here means the full appointed num- 
 ber, and only covers an elect few, then an elect few 
 are all that will ever be saved, and this brings the 
 passage into direct conflict with James's interpretation 
 of Amos in Acts 15 : 16-18. The only tenable inter- 
 pretation of " fulness " in Rom. 11 : 25 is to ^ive it its 
 usual meaning of the great body of the Gentiles. And 
 wiio can doubt that Acts 15 : lG-18 and Rom. 11 : 25 
 refer to the same gathering in of the Gentiles ? The 
 first says, " All the Gentiles upon whom my name is 
 
THK 1M10(MIESS OF THE (JOSI'EL. 
 
 2;i:) 
 
 called," the last, " the fulneHs of the (ientiles." Can 
 we believe the first refers to the salvation of thejjfreat 
 body of the Gentiles, and the last to the salvation of 
 only an elect few ? Can we believe what is declared 
 in these two similar forms of expression, which appear 
 to be essentially identical, can really refer to what is 
 in the strou<jest contrast, the one alludini: to a scat- 
 tered few in the present dispensation, and the other to 
 the great hosts of the Gentiles in a dispensation which 
 is described as its antithesis ? The only consistent 
 interpretation of the two passages is to make them 
 both allude to the same gathering of the Gentiles into 
 the kingdom of God in the present dispensation, before 
 Christ conies. To rend them apart, and make one 
 refer to the salvation of an elect few before the Lord's 
 personal coming, and the other to the conversion of 
 all after His coming, is both to do the greatest violence 
 to the meaning of " fulness " in the connection in 
 which it stands in Rom. 11: 25 (comp. 10-12, and 
 observe "in part "' and " fulness," v. 25, and " all," v. 26) 
 and to put asunder passages which evidently refer to 
 the same great but gradual event. 
 
 Let, then, the great commission, in which, if any- 
 where, we might well look for the statement of the 
 purpose of the preaching of the Gospel ; let these other 
 passages which have been quoted, and let the proof 
 that there is no probation after Christ comes, be set 
 over against these two misused passages upon which 
 Pre-millennialists depend almost exclusively for their 
 gloomy view. When it is seen that, in the case of one 
 of these passages, it can serve this view only when 
 
 ''''fill 
 
"^^Wfmmi 
 
 m 
 
 m\ 
 
 
 i 
 
 t^ii 
 
 s 
 
 < li 
 
 ,. If 
 
 '"M 
 
 I -i.4. :f 
 
 t V''ln 
 
 
 
 ' ■^^tl 
 
 
 '■ '^-l 
 
 
 LHiauE.is' ''if 
 
 r\ 
 
 IPMI ^«' 
 
 i 
 
 iiL^'lii 
 
 2:m 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHAT()I.(MiV. 
 
 interpreted in most obvious (li.src^nrd of tlic connec- 
 tion in whicli it .stands, and in case of tlie other, only 
 by forcinj^ on it a ni(!anin<^ it docss not naturally 1 (ear, 
 and which it need not convey, may we not well won- 
 der that they could have been used to override 
 tlie teachin<^ of tlie very passages which seem ex- 
 pressly given to tell us what the purpose and outcome 
 of the preaching of the Gospel is to bo, and which 
 declare it, in no ambiguous terms, to be the very op- 
 posite of that which thus seems to be forced from 
 Matt. 24: 14 and Acts 15: 14? 
 
 In suppoct of their view that comparatively few 
 are to be saved before the second advent, and that, 
 therefore, the millennium of the righteous cannot have 
 place until after this event, Pre millennialists refer to 
 a few other passages which, they allege, describe the 
 future of the Church and of the world in too gloomy 
 terms to include such a period. 
 
 Emphasis is laid upon 2 Tim. 8 : 1 .sy/., 2 Pet. *i : 8, 
 and two or three kindred passages, in which it is said 
 that in " the last day " there shall be grievous times 
 and a widespread declension from Christian truth and 
 life. But we must not be too sure that all these pas- 
 sages refer to the times immediately preceding the 
 second coming of the Lord. In Acts 2 : 17 " last days " 
 is used to cover the whole dispensation. In 1 Tim. 
 4:1" later times " also refers to all the times subse- 
 quent to those in which the apostle lived. It is also 
 to be remarked that he refers to similar conditions, 
 as in 2 Tim. 3 : 2 sq., and Paul warns Timothy of them, 
 in both letters, in order to prepare him for them as 
 
m 
 it 
 
 connoc- 
 31-, only 
 ly Itoar, 
 ill won- 
 iverride 
 cm ex- 
 mtcome 
 [ which 
 ■cry op- 
 id from 
 
 elv few 
 id that, 
 lot have 
 
 refer to 
 ribe the 
 
 gloomy 
 
 et. *i : 3, 
 
 ■j is said 
 
 IS times 
 
 uth and 
 
 ese pas- 
 
 ng the 
 
 t days " 
 
 1 Tim. 
 
 subse- 
 
 is also 
 
 ditions, 
 
 )f them, 
 
 hem as 
 
 THE IMIOORESS OK THE fSOSI'EL. 
 
 237 
 
 already begun or imme<liat('ly impending. In .bimea 
 5: 3 also ' tlu; last days " are used to designate the 
 times when James wrote his letter. While "the last 
 day" has a single deKnite reference to the coining of 
 the Lord and the grand events associated with it, the 
 expression "the last days" does not have so Hxed a 
 reference to the times immediately jn'eceding this 
 closing act of this aire. It is also noticeable that John 
 (1 Jolin 2: 18) declares the time when he wrote, the 
 " last time." Now, if the scripture writers used these 
 expres.sions to cover the whole period of the C'hristian 
 disp(;nsati()n, including the time when they themselves 
 lived, as they do in some instances, it is difficult to 
 prove that they used them in any case exclusively of 
 the time immediately before the end of the world. 
 " Last days " would, according to this interpreta- 
 tion, be in tacit antithesis to the days of the past, 
 The meaning of 2 Tim. 3 : 1 sq., would then be that 
 Paul saw all he described as to take place in the 
 future, but not necessarily, perhaps not probably, in 
 the remote future : for how, then, could he refer to 
 what was to happen to forewarn Timothy as against 
 what already threatened the early church ? But 
 even though Paul and Peter did refer to what was 
 immediately to precede the end, their descriptions 
 would be just in keeping with the great lapse of 
 righteousness and the uprising of wickedness between 
 the millennium and the end, as described in Rev. 20 : 
 G-IL Neither does either of the apostles declare that 
 the conditions of things they describe in the passages 
 we have referred to, abide as a permanent feature of 
 
 
 t.. 
 
rrrr 
 
 r- 
 
 IPI 
 
 m 
 
 4 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 1 ' 
 
 i j :' ; 
 
 III 
 
 'il 
 
 ^iii-| 
 
 ■ 1 J ■ ■ 
 
 Bj 1 ' ' 
 
 
 238 
 
 A STrOY IN ESCHATOT.OfJY. 
 
 tlie life of tins dispcuHjitioii. If the vlovv be taken 
 that (he a))()HtI(vs referred in tliem to the times iinine- 
 (li}i(«'ly i)reee<liii;r tlu; end, as it is in these hist thtys 
 tliat these (h^tarttires from tlie faith and life of tiic 
 Oospel were to occur, it certaiidy imj)li«'s that it was 
 in them only that they should be nianifest<Ml ; or 
 manifestc<l, at least, to the dej^rce they were then to 
 i-each. If they refer to tlie whole periofl of the 
 Clun'cli, beginninf^ with the apostolic a^i;, tlu»n it is 
 merely declared that sueh a state of thin<;s would 
 have; place: but for how lonjj^ or how often, nothintr 
 is said. In neither case, therefore, can these passages 
 have any decisive bearing upon the (juestion at issue. 
 If, finally, we take the view that the writers of these 
 passages nuilly expected the Lord soon to appear, and 
 thought the times in which they lived the last in the 
 sense of immediately preceding His advent, then the 
 foreshorten inir of the future which reduced thousands 
 of years to a span, left room, in the stretches of time 
 it proved they left unnoticed, for a millennium of 
 prevalent righteousness. These passages do not prove 
 that the wo "Id will grow worse and worse until the 
 second advent. They only prove that there will bo a 
 period of relapse. 
 
 Reference is also made to such passages as 2 Tim. 
 3 : 12, " All that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall 
 suffer persecution"; John 16: 33, "In the world ye 
 shall have tribulation." But in the latter passage, 
 our Lord refers specifically to His disciples to whom 
 He was speaking, as the connection shows. In the 
 first the meaning need be nothing more than that all 
 
TIIF PHOnRFSS OF TIfE riOSPKI,. 
 
 2na 
 
 taken 
 iinine- 
 
 Ht (lays 
 of tho 
 it was 
 
 bed ; or 
 
 tllLMl to 
 
 of tl\e 
 m it is 
 wonkl 
 nothing 
 )aHHnj^o8 
 it issue. 
 )\' these 
 car, nnil 
 b n the 
 lien tho 
 ousands 
 ){ time 
 lium of 
 )t prove 
 til the 
 ill be a 
 
 ni 
 
 2 Tim. 
 us shall 
 orld ye 
 )assage, 
 whom 
 
 In the 
 Ithat all 
 
 of thoH(! who would live iLTodlv, in tlie times an<l cir- 
 eumstanccH pn^vailin;^ when Paul wrot(^ to Timothy, 
 shall suffer persecution, not that tlu^ persecutin;jf mij^ht 
 of (»vil should prevail without break to the eii<l of tho 
 world. 
 
 It is \u\] that Matt. '24 : ^7, -SH (comp. Luke 17 : 26, 
 27) in<lieat(ss that th«; time immcMliately precedini^ tho 
 comin*,' of the Lord will be one of aboutidintj; wicked- 
 n(!ss. liut the compariso!i is not so nnich between 
 the wiekedness of the days before the flood and those 
 days, as between the unexpectedness of the comin<^ 
 of the Hood and of our Lord, .lust as in the; parable 
 of the ten vir<^ins, the cry, " Lehold the bride<^rooin 
 Cometh," caught the virgins all slumbering, an<l took 
 them by surprise, so here, the coming of the Son of 
 (lod bursts upon a world as little expecting His 
 appearing as did tlie antediluvians the flood. If em- 
 |)hasis is *o be lai<l upon the wickedness as well, it is 
 also laid upon the destructicm of the wicked as well, 
 and this is just what our pre-millennial brethren 
 deny : for they hold that Christ does not come to 
 destroy " all " the wicked, but to introduce the great 
 era of salvation. If it is here declare<l that wicked- 
 ness is to abound, and that the wicked are to be 
 destroyed at the Lord's coining, it is in exact accord 
 with the post-millennial interpretati(m of Rev. 20 : 
 11 sq., where the final uprising of wickedness after 
 the millennium is crushed out by the coming of the 
 Lord and the tremendous scenes of the general resur- 
 rection and judgment. 
 
 The pre-millennial interpretation of Luke 18 : 8 
 
Hi'™ r 
 
 ^*fi 
 
 240 
 
 A STUDY IX ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 < .■ i -I 
 
 " Howbeit, when the Son of man cometh, shall he find 
 faith on the earth ? " as declaring that our Lord really 
 doubted whether there should be any believers or 
 saved people on the earth at His second toming, 
 proves too much, and contradicts the plainest teaching 
 of other passages. In our Lord's parables referring 
 to His coming, Ke speaks of the faithful servants, 
 and in most cases they outnumber the unfaithful. 
 There is wheat as well as tares at His coming, and 
 the tares are among the wheat, suggesting that the 
 great mass of mankind are saved, Pre-millennialists 
 themselves make the judgment of Matt. 25: 31 sq., 
 that of the nations which are alive on the earth when 
 our Lord cornea, and yet some of these are described 
 as sheep, and enter into the kingdom prepared for 
 them from the foundation of the world. Their own 
 interpretation of these parables is in conflict with the 
 one they give of Luke 18 : 8, showing that it is as im- 
 possible from their own view as from the plainest 
 teaching of tht whole New Testament. Paul speaks 
 of those who are alive when Christ comes, who are to 
 be caught up to meet Him in the air, and the living 
 righteous shall not precede the righteous dead in the 
 glad resurrection day, in meeting the Lord, in their 
 resurrection bodies. Whatever interpretation we 
 accept of this passage, it cannot mean what our pre- 
 millennial friends would make it signify. 
 
 Perhaps the passage upon which they chiefly rely 
 to prove that the world is to get worse and worse 
 until our Lord comes, is 2 Thess. 2: 3-10, "Let no 
 man beguile you in any wise, for it will not be, except 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 ll 
 
 
 
 m 
 
THE PROGRESS OF THE GOSPEL. 
 
 241 
 
 e find 
 
 really 
 
 jrs or 
 
 ming, 
 
 tching 
 
 erring 
 
 vantH, 
 
 ithful. 
 
 nr, and 
 
 at the 
 
 lialists 
 
 31 sq., 
 
 1 when 
 
 scribed 
 
 •ed for 
 
 ir own 
 
 ith the 
 
 ; as ini- 
 
 )lainest 
 speaks 
 are to 
 Uving 
 in the 
 their 
 ion we 
 ur pre- 
 
 fly rely 
 worse 
 Let no 
 , except 
 
 m 
 
 the falling away come first, and the man of sin be 
 revealed, the son of perdition, he that opposeth and 
 exalteth himself against all that is called God, or that 
 is worshipped ; so that he sitteth in the temple of 
 God, setting himself forth as God Remember ye not, 
 that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things ? 
 And now ye know that which restraineth, to the end 
 that he may be revealed in his own season. For 
 the mystery of lawlessness doth already work : only 
 there is one that restraineth now, until he be taken 
 out of the way. And then shall be revealed the law- 
 less one, whom the Lord Jesus shall slay with the 
 breath of his mouth, and bring to nought by the 
 manifestation of his coming." 
 
 Our purpose does not require a discussion of the 
 difficulties which beset the interpretation of this pas- 
 sage. Suffice it to say that a few of the best exegetes, 
 and not all of them Post-millennialists, do not regard 
 the " manifestation of his coming " or presence which 
 is to " slay " and " bring to nought " the " lawless 
 one " or " the man of sin," as His personal appearing. 
 But allow that it is of our Lord's personal appearing 
 that the apostle speaks, and still we are not required 
 to believe that evil is to go on with steady and ever- 
 increasing might until the second advent. The apostle 
 is giving the future history of iniquity, and not a 
 general history of the Church and of the world. It is 
 the long-drawn course of evil which presents itself in 
 his vision, and suffices to make the immediate coming 
 of the Lord impossible. His course of thought, there- 
 fore, does not require the mention of any long period 
 16 
 
 m 
 
; r 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 n 
 
 !; 
 
 ': 1 
 
 1 
 
 ' 
 
 i , 
 
 t 
 ■ . i 
 
 ; ' ' i 
 
 ; ■ ' i H 
 
 Hi ■ I 
 
 iKi 1 i i'' ' 
 
 242 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOQY. 
 
 of prevalent righteousness during the time inirpiity is 
 to continue to exist on the earth, even though He 
 was aware that such a period was to have phice before 
 evil was to be brought to nought " by the manifesta- 
 tion of his coming." In an outline of the whole 
 course of evil, extending over two thousand and we 
 know not how many more thousands of years, which 
 is contained in two or three graphic sentences, there 
 is no room for the specification of details. Even 
 though Paul did not have his mind fixed upon the dark 
 history of iniquity, the sweep of the description is far 
 too general to make it an^* .^hing like certain that he 
 must have mentioned the millennial period, were it 
 within the limits of the time his outline covers. There 
 is also mention made of a restraining power which 
 keeps the working of lawlessness secret, " a mystery," 
 in contrast to the revelation of the " lawless one," 
 near the end. During the time of this restraint of 
 evil, in connection v/ith the general nature of the 
 description, there is room for a millennium consistent 
 with the great uprising of wickedness (Rev. 20 : 7- 
 11) at its close. 
 
 Nor is this all. There is a positive and fatal objec- 
 tion to the view that the millennium is to come after 
 the coming of the Lord here spoken of. If the millen- 
 nium is to come after this great event, so also must 
 the tremendous uprising of wickedness which suc- 
 ceeds it in Rev. 20: 7-11. But if anything be plain, 
 Paul in our passage intends to trace the dark history 
 of evil in this world until its complete and final 
 pverthrpw, The interpret«^tion, which places the 
 
THE PROGRESS OF THE GOSPEL. 
 
 243 
 
 ity is 
 
 li He 
 
 )efore 
 
 festa- 
 
 vvhole 
 
 id we 
 
 which 
 
 there 
 
 Even 
 e dark 
 I is far 
 hat he 
 vere it 
 
 There 
 
 which 
 ^stery," 
 s one," 
 aint of 
 
 of the 
 
 sistent 
 
 20: 7- 
 
 [l objec- 
 le after 
 millen- 
 Iso must 
 Ich suc- 
 >e plain, 
 history 
 id final 
 Icea the 
 
 niillenniuin after this clos(3 of the history of evil is 
 impossible : because we liave, after the millennium, 
 and long after the end of its course mentioned here, 
 an outburst described in terms which make it evident 
 that it is to be one of the most terrific that the earth, 
 which has been so lonfj cursed with so many of them, 
 is ever to see. Just as surely as Paul in 2 Tliess. 2 : 3-10 
 traces the history of ini(juity to its close, so certain is 
 it that the coming of the Lord, which is to mark its 
 final destruction, must be after the great uprising of 
 wickedness in Rev. 20 : 7-10, and, therefore, after the 
 millennium. Instead, therefore, of this passage afford- 
 ing an insuperable objection to the post-millennial 
 view it is to the pre-niillennial view it is fatal. 
 
 Neither can this passage be made to square with 
 other features of the pre-millennial theory. Evil, in 
 its great representative, is not to be slain and "brought 
 to nought" by the "manifestation of his coming," 
 meaning His second personal advent, according to 
 this theory. Iniquity, through the conversion of a 
 world almost altogether given up to wickedness at 
 His coming, is to be destroyed by a process of con- 
 version after He has come, and the seeds of evil are 
 to remain for over a thousand years, to spring up at 
 last for a terrible harvest. 
 
 Finally, how are 2 Thess. 2: 3-10 and Rev. 20 : 7-10 
 to be reconciled ? 
 
 No one who compares the two passages carefully, 
 can fail to be struck by the similarity of their descrip- 
 tions. The outburst of evil in both covers but a short 
 period. In Thessaloniai^s it seems to have its cuj- 
 
 ^1 
 
244 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 
 
 
 f 
 
 i 
 
 t 
 
 i 
 
 ! 1 i 
 
 V 
 
 mination, its time of power and its overthrow within 
 the lifetime of some prince of evil : in Revelation it 
 is said to be " for a little time." In each case the 
 bursting forth of the evil might appears to be sudden. 
 In both cases it flares forth after long restraint, 
 apparently the more tierce because of the long repres- 
 sion. In both sudden destruction falls upon the evil 
 power, when at its terrific climax. In both the over- 
 throw of evil seems to be utter and final, from which 
 there is no recovery. If they both describe the final 
 overthrow, they must, of course, be different descrip- 
 tions of the same event. In one the destruction is said 
 to be by " the manifestation of his coming." In the 
 other it is said, '* fire came down out of heaven and 
 devoured them " (Rev. 20 : 9). When we read in 2 
 Thess. 1 : 7, 8 of the revelation of the Lord Jesus from 
 heaven — in flaming fire, " rendering vengeance," we 
 see how the " fire out of heaven " of Rev. 20 : 9 might 
 well be the " flaming fire " of the Lord's coming of 
 2 Thess. 1 : 7, 8. 
 
 This interpretation would associate the "fire out 
 of heaven " with the coming of the Lord to raise the 
 dead, and to judge all men " out of the things written 
 in the books " as the author innnediately proceeds to 
 describe. While there are some points left without 
 full explanation, this interpretation brings the passage 
 in 2 Thess. 2 : 3-10, into strictest harmony with 
 Rev 20 : 4-15, and is in agreement with the general 
 teaching of the New Testament that there is no pro- 
 bation after Christ comes. 
 
 All the millennium there is, therefore, must be 
 

 THE PROGRESS OF THE fJOSPEL. 
 
 245 
 
 itliin 
 on it 
 e the 
 dden. 
 raint, 
 jpres- 
 e evil 
 
 over- 
 which 
 e final 
 jscrip- 
 is said 
 In the 
 n and 
 i in 2 
 s from 
 e," we 
 
 might 
 ling of 
 
 re out 
 ise the 
 vritten 
 eeds to 
 vithout 
 Dassage 
 with 
 ofeneral 
 no pro- 
 
 mst be 
 
 before the coming here spoken of, for there can be no 
 uprising of wickedness after the destruction of evil 
 here alluded to, and after probation ends and judg- 
 ment has been executed. 
 
 A general study, therefore, of 2 Thess 2 : 8-10 
 does not forbid a millennium consistent with the con- 
 tinued existence of evil during its course, which the 
 uprising of wickedness at its close makes necessary. 
 The character of the destruction dealt with also as 
 it culminates in the " man of sin " and the seeming 
 essential identity of the latter part of this description 
 with Rev. 20 : 7-10 makes a millennium and a subse- 
 quent uprising of wickedness after the " manifestation 
 of his coming " here spoken of, out of the question. 
 So also does all the proof already given that pro- 
 bation ends at the coming of the Lord. We have 
 positive evidence, however, that there is to be a 
 growth in Christ's kingdom on earth until the world 
 is brought to His feet, instead of the world growing 
 worse and worse until the end. 
 
 In Matt., chap. 13, there are two parables, evidently 
 intended by our Lord to describe the future of the 
 kingdom of heaven among men. In vs. 31, 32 He 
 sa'ys : " The kingdom of heaven is like unto a grain of 
 mustard seed which a man took and sowed in his 
 field, which is indeed less than all seeds : but when it 
 is grown, it is greater than the herbs, and becometh 
 a tree, so that the birds of the heavens come and 
 lodge in the branches thereof." 
 
 The feature of the kingdom of heaven here spoken 
 of is evident upon the face of the passage. It is to 
 

 N . ■ ■ ! 
 
 ■ i 
 ■ij ■ ■ ; ) 
 
 h 
 
 
 24G 
 
 A STUDY IN EscnA'mi.or;v. 
 
 increase from a very small beginning until it l)ecomes 
 great. The mustard plant, however large it grows, is 
 of the same nature as the seed from which it springs. 
 There is no hint in this parable of a people back- 
 sliding into evil. It is the kingdom of heaven still, 
 the same in character but grown into greatness To 
 speak of unclean birds lodging in the branches of the 
 nmstard tree, and say that the parable refers to a 
 corrupt church, is to be ruled by fancy, rather than 
 deal in sober exegesis. The kingdom of heaven is 
 not said to be like the birds, be they clean or unclean, 
 but like the mustard tree which must, by virtue of 
 its being a mustard tree, be of the same nature as the 
 seed. It is not said whether the birds are clean or 
 unclean. All that is signified by the birds taking 
 refuge in the branches, if it is added for any other 
 purpose than to show the size of the mustard tree, is 
 to show that the kingdom of heaven is to be a shelter 
 for those who might naturally be expected to take 
 refuge there, just as the birds naturally find shelter 
 in the branches of trees. 
 
 According to this parable then, the kingdom of 
 heaven, in comparison with its small beginning, is to 
 become great and mighty. 
 
 May we not also believe it was intended to teach 
 that this kingdom was also to reach the fulness of its 
 greatness and strength, not by sudden impulses of 
 power, but by a growth, in the main steady ? There 
 is room for the arrest of growth, it may be, as a plant 
 is stricken by drought, etc. There is room for more 
 or less rapid growth. There may be room for tern- 
 

 THE PROGRESS OF THE (JOSPEL. 
 
 247 
 
 porary decliiK.', just as a plant may become weak 
 through evil conditions. But there is no room in this 
 parable, any more than there is in the facts of the 
 church iiistory, for the view that this kingdom is to 
 have no growth which will impress the world and 
 make it better. There is no room for the idea that 
 the kingdom is not yet established, or that it is to 
 have no growth until a time in the indefinite future, 
 when our Lord is to come ; and that then it is to 
 shoot up into fullest growth, and bloom like a cen- 
 tury plant in a day. Its increase from the beginning 
 until it reaches its fullest growth, is to be on the same 
 principles, so far as this parable gives us any informa- 
 tion. It is not to begin and end its development 
 under such changed principles as those our pre-millen- 
 nial brethren suppose will prevail before and after 
 our Lord's second coming. 
 
 The second parable follows in v. 33, " The kingdom 
 of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, 
 and hid in three measures of meal, till it was all 
 leavened." 
 
 The natural interpretation of this parable is evi- 
 dent. There does not seem to be anything dark or 
 hidden about it. It is to the leaven the kingdom of 
 heaven is like, and it is like it in its pervasive, assimi- 
 lative power. That which corresponds to the three 
 measures of meal is mankind, among whom the king- 
 dom of heaven is introduced. Corresponding to the 
 woman would be God himself, who established this 
 kingdom among men. The teaching is that, just as 
 the leaven does not cease its pervasive, assimilative 
 
 m 
 
 I if 
 
248 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOUKJY. 
 
 
 ! 
 
 I til 
 
 w 
 
 !'l 
 
 iili 
 
 intlucnce until all into which it is cast is transformed 
 and made like itself, so also the kingdom of heaven, 
 as it has been introduced among men, is not to cease 
 its work until all mankind, in the general sense in 
 which such comprehensive representations are to be 
 taken, has been reached and transformed by its prin- 
 ciples. Like the leaven, it is to begin its work as 
 soon as it is placed in contact with the life of the 
 world. Like the leaven, it is not to cease its work 
 until "all" the great mass of mankind has yielded 
 to its transforming power. The final generality of its 
 assimilative influence is one of the plainest teachings 
 of the parable, just as in the preceding parable it is 
 a progress from the beginning of the kingdom on 
 earth until its close. Fluctuations there may be, but 
 there is a general advance, just as the tide flows on, 
 although there may be receding waves upon the 
 beach during its flood. Instead of evil going on to a 
 great climax, from the time the kingdom was set up 
 by our Lord until He comes again, it is the principles 
 of His kingdom which sweep onward, as the ages go 
 by. From the time when our Lord said " the king- 
 dom of heaven is at hand," instead of evil being on 
 the flow and the principles of this kingdom on the 
 ebb, it was to be the forces of evil which were to ebb 
 and the forces of His kingdom which were to move 
 forward in perpetual flood. The great trend of the 
 ages was to be upward and not downward. 
 
 So evident is the teaching of this parable, inter- 
 preted in this natural way, fatal to the pessimistic 
 view of our pre-millennial brethren, that they are 
 
 m 
 

 THE PROGUESH OF THE (JOSPEL. 
 
 249 
 
 aware its forco muHt bo broken or their theory 
 abandoned. 
 
 The attempt to interpret thi.s parable in harmony 
 witli their view tliat the world is ^rowin«; worse, is 
 one of the most astounding of exegetieal perform- 
 ances. Tliey actually attempt to sliow that leaven is 
 used here as a symbol of pollution and corruption, as 
 in most other cases in the Bible, and that the parable 
 is to show "the progress of corruption and deteriora- 
 tion in i;he outward visible church," as Alford states 
 the view to controvert it. Let us see how the parable 
 reads, when the language of reality is substituted for 
 that of symbol, on this understanding. " The king- 
 dom of heaven is like pollution and corruption which 
 Satan introduced into the outward visible church 
 until the whole was corrupted." Now, the compari- 
 son is either between the kingdom of heaven and the 
 leaven, or it is between the progress of the kingdom 
 and the leaven in its transforming work. If we take 
 the first alternative, then the kingdom of heaven is 
 pollution and corruption, which no one will dare affirm. 
 If we take the second, then it is the kingdom of heaven 
 which is to transform and assimilate humanity as the 
 leaven does the meal. That which transforms and 
 assimilates in each case must transform through what 
 it is in itself, and assimilate to its own nature. If we 
 say that something transforms by what is foreign to 
 its own nature, and assimilates to what is the very 
 opposite to itself in nature, we are perverting expres- 
 sions to a false use. If the kingdom of heaven is to 
 act like leaven in the meal, just as the leaven is said 
 
 tii' 
 
 iifi 
 
 
^^ 
 
 250 
 
 A STUDY IN KSCIIATOLUUY. 
 
 j; i 
 
 ■ 1 1 
 ? 
 
 1 
 
 ii 
 
 ^ 1 
 
 ■^ 
 
 ijs^j^J 
 
 ■1 
 
 ■■■MllikL. 1 
 
 to tniiiHfonn by its own nature to its own nature, 
 HO tho kinj^doiii nniHtdo its work by its own princi- 
 ples brinj(inj( tlie world into luirniony witli tliom- 
 selv(!S. If tlie kin<i;(loMi of heiiven, in actinj^ like 
 leaven, pollutes, it must be because its principles, 
 which it infuses, are themselves morally corrupt. 
 This, no man, however much driven by the need of 
 bad exe<;esis to support a (juestionable theory, would 
 venture to assert. From whatever standpoint, there- 
 fore, we view the parable, this pre-millennial inter- 
 pretation is impossible. 
 
 Neither is it true that leaven is always a symbol 
 of evil in the Bible. In Lev. 7 : 13, 23 : 15-17 leavened 
 bread is commanded to be offered to the Lord. Rev. 
 J. Gall, in his excellent treatise on " Wherein Millen- 
 arians are Wrong," argues that when the work of 
 Christ is symbolized, as it was definite and fixed, 
 leaven was forbidden : but where the expansive work 
 of the Spirit was to be set forth, leaven is commanded, 
 as in the instances given above. His argument is 
 strong. But be this as it may, we can scarcely 
 believe that God would command, even in symbol, 
 that what is essentially evil and corrupt should be 
 offered to Him. We are more than doubtful whether 
 leaven is invariably the symbol of evil in the 
 Scriptures. 
 
 The pre-millennial interpretation of this parable, 
 even if it were possible on other grounds, is impossible 
 because it proves too much, especially for other 
 features of their own theory. If the kingdom of 
 heaven is to help the spread of corruption until " all " 
 
TIIK I'UOCKKSS Ol' I'HK <;()SI'KL. 
 
 251 
 
 is cori'uptod, W(! fail to .see why ourlovinj^ Fatlier in 
 heaven e.stahlishoil it on oartli. Wl»y ho at such 
 troniondouH cost to hasten (!vil on to its universal 
 dominion ( Kor, mark you, this parahlc ^ives the final 
 outcome of the existence of tlw^ kin<,'(lom on earth. 
 Also, if this is to be the futui'e of th(» work of the 
 kintjdom, what becomes of the teaching that tlie 
 kin(^dom is not yet established, and that, when it is 
 inaugurated at Christ's second coining, instead of its 
 being associated with a victorious might of evil, 
 righteousness is to have its grand triumph ? 
 
 Finally, this interpretation of this parable, and the 
 whole view of the continued progress of evil until 
 Christ comes, in whose interest it is adopted, at so 
 nmch violence to its plainest meaning, is contradicted 
 by the facts of church history. Is it true that, from 
 the time Christ set up His kingdom — the leaven was 
 put in the meal — the world has been growing worse 
 and worse ? The man who would say so must eitlier 
 be ignorant of the festering wickedness of the world 
 at the time of Christ, or he must shut his eyes to the 
 condition of the world to-day. 
 
 In addition to these parables which so clearly teach 
 the growth of the kingdom of heaven and the exten- 
 sion of its principles in their pervasive and trans- 
 forming might, the reader is referred to all the 
 passages adduced in proof that " all the Gentiles," 
 " the fulness of the Gentiles," and " all Israel " are to 
 be saved in the present dispensation ; and also the 
 proof that there is to be no salvation for any after our 
 Lord's second coming. If this last position has been 
 
 ^<i 
 
2)2 
 
 A STUDY IN EH* MATOLOUV, 
 
 lii 
 
 , ( 
 
 < 
 
 '• 1* 
 . ' 1 I 
 
 Hi) 
 
 n 
 
 ! 
 
 Hustaiiiod, thou evory t^lowlng dcMcrlption of the pro- 
 gress of truth and right(3()Usn(3Hs and the ;^atherinj( of 
 tlie people of i\u\ world into the kingdom of (iod 
 ini<;ht he adduced in rebuttal of the interpretation 
 which would draw from the Bible the dark doctrine 
 that it is evil and not <^ood which is advancing with 
 all-con(|uerin«^ niit^ht in the present dispensation. 
 We place all this over against the few passages 
 adduced to establish this deplorable position. To 
 concluile : some of the passages depended upon can 
 only help this view as a very forced and uiniatiu'al 
 interpretation is given them, an interpretation to 
 which no Hrst-class exegete has ever committed him- 
 self. Others are general in their character, and do 
 not necessarily conHict with the alternative view. 
 This interpretation is also in direct conHict with the 
 facts of history, and cannot be reconciled even with 
 other features of the pre-millennial view. Does it 
 seem presumptuous to declare that it is erroneous ? 
 
TMK MII-IJCNNH'M. 
 
 258 
 
 CIIAPTKR XiV. 
 
 THE MILLENXIl'M. 
 
 Ouii trwitincnt would not be complete witliout a 
 short clmpter on the nnllenniuin itself. 
 
 AcconliiifT to Rev. 20: 1-6, Satan is said to be 
 Ifound for a thousand years, and restrained for this 
 loii^ period from deceiving the nations. The souls of 
 the martyrs are said to live and reign with Christ. 
 If our interpretation of this passage be corr"<;t, this is 
 the language of symbol, as is so much of Revelation, 
 indicating the triumph of the cause and spirit of the 
 martyrs, just as the binding of Satan signifies nega- 
 tively the limiting and controlling of his evil power. 
 Just how much is meant by this symbolic description 
 is not easy to dotermine. No true view of the period, 
 however, can be had, unless we make it consistent 
 with the uprising of wickedness which is immediately 
 to follow, as described in Rev. 20 : 7-10: "And when 
 the thousand years are finished, Satan shall be loosed 
 out of his prison, and shall come forth to deceive the 
 nations which are on the four corners of the earth, 
 Gog and Magog, to gather them together for the 
 war ; the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. 
 
254 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOfJY. 
 
 ;,| 
 
 i 
 
 
 :'' 
 
 1 
 
 ' 
 
 i 
 
 ii 
 
 And tlu^y went up over tin; bn.'adtli of the cartli, and 
 compassed tlie camp of the saints about, and the 
 beloved city : and fire came down out of lieaven and 
 devoured them." 
 
 It is to be noticed tliat this dark period is declared 
 to be "a little time" in v. 3. While we must not 
 press this comparative designation of its length too 
 far, and make it too short, the whole description 
 makes it evident that evil Hares out with great sud- 
 denness. It is scarcely consistent with the view that 
 it arises gradually, as the last generation of the mil- 
 lennium die, and a new generation gradually giv^e 
 themselves up to the deceptive blandishments of 
 Satan. Immediately upon his release he is said to go 
 forth t(j deceive the nations, and to gather his follow- 
 ers to battle. He does not need to wait until a new 
 generation grows up who have not beheld the J4lory 
 of the millennial years. He does not have to delay 
 until a host " as the sand of the sea " are born and 
 grow up in sin. He seems to find his material ready 
 to his hand. What is the necessary inference from 
 all this, for all who believe that regeneration is once 
 and for all, and that all who are regenerated are 
 beyond such deceptive power as Satan is here said to 
 use, and cannot be supposed to make up the army he 
 gathers ? It nmst be that during the millennium — at 
 the close of a period so transcendently blessed — there 
 are to be hosts of unregenerate men and women who 
 will be ready, when the power of evil again is on the 
 flood, to give themselves up to its flow, and to ally 
 themselves with the satanic might which is gather- 
 
THE MILLENNIUM. 
 
 255 
 
 in<^ its forces to daah itself againnt the stron<;hol(l of 
 tlie saints of the Lord. Tliis is in perfect accord with 
 Old Testament prophecy of the millennial period. In 
 Isaiah Go : 20, for instance, in a prophecy acknow- 
 ledged by Pre-millennialists universally to refer to 
 this era, we read that the sinner dying an hundred 
 years old, shall be accursed. Does not this give us a 
 pretty certain clue to the character of the millen- 
 nium, and help us in o'lr interpretation of the glowing 
 imagery of Old Testament prophecy in reference to 
 it ? Righteousness is to rule, the might of evil is to 
 be kept in subjection, the principles of the kingdom 
 of heaven are to dominate the social life, and mani- 
 fest themselves in all the range of human activities ; 
 but all men are not saved. Sin is subject, but it is 
 not eradicated. It may be smouldering in the souls 
 of hosts of unregenerate people. It may even be 
 growing intense through its repression, and all the 
 more ready to burst out in sudden and destructive 
 violence when once Satan is permitted to give it the 
 electric touch of his unrestrained power. Those who 
 have noticed the exuberance of description in the 
 prophecies of the return from the captivity in Baby- 
 lon will have little difficulty in reconciling with the 
 view of the millennium given above, the glowing 
 language used of it in the Old Testament. We are 
 seeking, in what is given above, to give the true view 
 of the millennium, and are not assuming that Pre- 
 millennialists generally have a different conception of 
 it, so far as the existence of sin is concerned. 
 
 J^et us gather up a few gf the tliflgculties which 
 
256 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOQY. 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 [.. 
 
 '^ ■ 
 
 1 n ! 
 
 > 
 
 |;'i 5 
 
 f 
 
 f ^ ' 
 
 J 
 
 |}'l 
 
 l i i 
 
 ■? ! 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 • 
 
 • ■'■,. 
 
 : 1 
 
 .'7 1 ■ i 
 
 . . -.1 
 
 beset the pre-millennial view of the millennium, as 
 following the coming of* the Lord. 
 
 Pre-millennialists all believe that the present dis- 
 pensation is to witness the salvation of but compara- 
 tively few. During its course the world is to grow 
 worse and worse, and it is to end in gloom and 
 failure, so far as the salvation and sanctification of 
 men are concerned. In contrast with this, as soon as 
 Christ appears to introduce the millennium and to 
 set up His kingdom and begin His personal reign, 
 with the world at the climax of its wickedness, the 
 work of salvation is to sweep over the earth, a nation 
 is to be born in a day, and righteousness is soon to 
 wield its sceptre over the life of mankind. 
 
 The first difficulty is to discover whence our pre- 
 millennial brethren, after the coming of Christ and 
 what occurs at His coming, are to get the wicked 
 stock which shall afford the material for the won- 
 drous displays of saving power v/hich we all believe 
 are to glorify this period. If anything is clear, the 
 " day of the Lord," in 2 Peter 3 : 10, is the day of our 
 Lord's second coming (see v. 4). How, then, are the 
 people in the flesh — all the wicked who have not been 
 changed by receiving their resurrection bodies — to 
 survive that day when the elements shall be dissolved 
 with fervent heat, and the earth and the works that 
 are therein shall be burned up ? To evade this diffi- 
 culty by putting the final conflagration more than a 
 millennium after our Lord comes, as does Blackstone, 
 etc., is a desperate resort. 
 
 But this is not all. These brethren tell us tliat the 
 
THE MILLENNIUM. 
 
 257 
 
 iudgment of Matt. 25 : 31 .sf/., is of " tlie liviiifif 
 nations." We do not admit tlieir right to exclude 
 from " all the nations " (v. 32), any nation, be it Jew or 
 Gentile, any more than to limit the application of the 
 same expression in the great commission. But all 
 the nations would then include all who are in the 
 flesh after our Lord appears. These, according to 
 pre-millennial interpretation, can only be the wicked: 
 for all the living saints have been caught up to meet 
 the Lord in the air, after having received their resur- 
 rection bodies. How, then, can there be any righteous 
 people among these nations to hear the welcoming 
 " Well done," etc ? But allowing that good people 
 still live in the flesh — even allow the figment of a 
 coming for and a coming with His people, with a time 
 between when some of the wicked who alone were 
 left when the righteous were caught up, might be 
 converted — and still the difficulty remains. All the 
 nations, including all mankind, either go away into 
 eternal punishment or eternal life. This judgment 
 is to final destiny, and as it is at the beginning of the 
 millennium, there can be no conversions : for there 
 remain none who are in a state of probation. Even 
 concede that "all the nations" here means, all the 
 Gentile nations, and that the Jews are the "brethren" 
 of the Lord spoken of in this grand description, and 
 still there is no great release from the diflficulty. We 
 cannot suppose He would thus designate the Jews 
 who were still opposing Him, and that the eternal 
 destiny of all men on the earth at His coming would 
 be determined by the way they had treated these 
 17 
 
li^ 
 
 258 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 Ii|'''n 
 
 .-.■Mi-' 
 
 .still stubborn and unbeHevinf^ members of this 
 race. Still we cannot find any men to be saved, 
 after this judgment, even allowing it to be of the 
 living nations. 
 
 Not only so, but it is evident from Old Testament 
 descriptions of the millennial era that men in the 
 flesh are to be agents in tlu^ groat work of God which 
 is then to make such glorious progress. But it is as 
 difficult to find righteous, as wicked, men in the 
 flesh, after Christ comes, and the judgmtrnt of Matt. 
 25 : 31 sq.y takes place, even though it were of the 
 living nations only. They could not, any more than 
 the wicked, survive the burning day of 2 Peter 3 : 10. 
 All the saints, also, are changed when Christ appears 
 to raise the dead (1 Cor. 15 : 50-52). There can, 
 therefore, be no righteous people, in the flesh, when 
 the millennium begins, to be the great missionaries 
 of which our pre-millennial brethren speak, to the 
 world of unsaved people they conceive then to be 
 awaiting their ministry. If there be wicked men 
 then still in a state of probation, they must be brought 
 in by tlie agency of the glorified, if by human agency 
 at all. 
 
 Thus the pre millennial view, on this point, is self- 
 contradictory, and is impossible in both of its parts. 
 There are no wicked people still remaining in the 
 flesh after the judgment of Matt. 25 : 31 sq., to be con- 
 verted, and there are no saints still in the flesh to be 
 the ministers of their salvation, did they then so 
 exist. 
 
 The conception Pre-millennialists have of the con- 
 
 li'iti 
 
THE MILI-ENXIUM. 
 
 259 
 
 nought 
 liffmcy 
 
 in 
 
 the 
 
 |)e con- 
 to be 
 len so 
 
 le con- 
 
 ditions cxi.stinf; in tlie niillcnniuin arc ulinoHt iinj)OH- 
 .sible of belief. Its very central thou<;lit is that Christ 
 is then to rei^n in personal and visible presence on 
 the earth. The kinj^dom is not really to be <'stab- 
 li,shed until He be<j^ins His pei'sonal rei<rn. Their 
 literal interpretation of Old Testament prophecy 
 forces upon them this view, and they must be pre- 
 pared to face all the conse(jUences. They, for the 
 most part, glory in it: but some, when confronted 
 with its difficulties, make vague statements. But if 
 our Lord is to reign in visible and personal presence 
 on the earth, so must all the hosts of the saved in all 
 generations, for, according to their interpretation of 
 Rev. 20 : 4-6, all these are included in thos(! who are 
 to live and reign with Him, and if He is reigning on 
 the earth, so must all these be with Him here. These 
 innumerable hosts of the glorified saints of all tlu; 
 ages are to associat(! with mortal men in the flesh. 
 Raised above the needs of the earthly life, tlwy are 
 to mingle with men who an; tilling their fields, pre- 
 paring food and raiment, building houses, etc. They 
 are also to witness pain and death, for people are to 
 continue to die. In this period, too, the virus of evil 
 is still to be in the nature, as is proved by the need of 
 regeneration then, and the multitudes who are ready 
 to follow Satan at its close, and they are to be brought 
 into intimate relations with sin. This view also re- 
 quires us to believe, either that those who are saved in 
 the millennium receive their resurrection body as soon 
 as they believe, or that there must be anotlier special 
 resurrection for those who die during its continuance. 
 
pnr 
 
 WK 
 
 I'i 
 
 \ni\ 
 
 M 
 
 § 
 
 260 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCIIATOLOGY. 
 
 The former of tlicsc altvnuitivcH involves with it the 
 neccH.sary conchi.sioii tliat, tlien, it is only tlie unsaved 
 wlio continue to pr()i)ajifate the race, that the work of 
 evangelization, so far as human agency is concerned, 
 must be done V)y the gloritieil, and tliat the army of 
 Satan, in tlte great uprising, actually comes up against 
 the camp of glorified and immortal saints, thus over- 
 turning all our conceptions of tlu; si'curity of those 
 who have passed into this state. The latter — that 
 saints die durintr the n^jllenniuin — if this is tlie time 
 when believers can be said first to inherit the kin*:- 
 dom of heaven, is in direct conflict with 1 Cor. 15 : 50, 
 "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God," 
 and of this second special resurrection and judgment 
 of saints tliere is not the remotest hint in the Bible : 
 nay, the teaching of Scripture is opposed to it from 
 Genesis to Revelation, 
 
 Again, how is it possible to reconcile this view of 
 the millennium with the uprising of wickedness at 
 its close ? We are asked to believe that, after a 
 thousand years of Christ's visible and personal ruU; 
 upon the earth with His glorified saints, sin is still un- 
 subdued, and only needs the presence and solicitation 
 of the prince of evil to flame up in God-defying 
 might. We must remember that our Lord's second 
 personal coming is represented in terms of boundless 
 contrast to His first. It is to be "in power and great 
 glory" (Matt. 24: 30). He is to come "in glory and 
 all the angels with him" (Matt. 25 : 31). The glory 
 is to flash around the world (Matt. 24: 27). It is 
 to be in " the glory of his might " (2 Thess. 1 : 9). 
 
 ! i , 
 
THE MILLENNIUM. 
 
 261 
 
 From His face tlu' very hoiveiiH are to tlee away 
 (Rev. 20 : 11). Of the Lord who is to come, it is said, 
 His eyes are " a Hame of fire," His voice like " the 
 sound of many waters," and His countenance as " the 
 sun shining in liis strength" (Rev. 1 : 13-10). This 
 Being, clothed with the glory and might and majesty 
 of divinity, with all the glorified hosts of redeemed 
 men, is to be present on the earth, displaying His 
 power in overcoming grace and judgment for a 
 thousand years, and there are still people as the sands 
 of the sea who, with the knowledge of His victorious 
 sway for a thousand years, and in the very presence 
 of His majesty and the myriads of redeemed men, if 
 not of angels as well, are ready to rise up and try 
 conclusions with Him and His hosts. For, be it 
 noticed, there is no hint given of any withdrawal of 
 our Lord and the redeemed from the earth, if they 
 are on the earth at all. While this reign with Christ 
 goes on, this insurrection is organized. The fact that 
 the forces of Satan are said to be gathered from the 
 four corners of the earth, seems to imply that there 
 were nations far away from the seat of power that 
 were unsubdued, and that these are now allowed to 
 come up against the central power of the saints, where 
 Christ and the saints had been reigning. They come 
 up, then, against the same rule which had been exer- 
 cising sway during all the previous periods. They 
 come, therefore, according to pre-millennial ideas of 
 this rule, up against Christ in all His personal might 
 and against the glorified hosts who have been reign- 
 ing so long with Him, as well as against saints in the 
 
\mT'' ' 
 
 r^^ 
 
 2G2 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOV. 
 
 - i 
 
 flesh. They actually hem these in in the beloved city 
 whither they had betaken themselves, and the camp 
 they had constructed for defence. Mortal men forcing 
 the onnnpt)tent Christ in personal and terrible presence 
 with all the hosts of the redeemed, as well as all 
 mortal saints to betake themselves to defences, in 
 order to keep themselves from being swept away, 
 ami fire from heaven has to come down to deliver 
 them : 
 
 It is difficult enough to understand how a condition 
 of things which required even a figurative description 
 of this kind, could succeed a thousand years of the 
 dominance of gospel influences which Post-millennial- 
 ists believe will prevail. But to suppose all this is to 
 be taken literally, and that mortal men will have the; 
 awful daring to come up against the omnipotent Son 
 of God, after He had reigned in person with the glori- 
 fied saints for a thousand years, and that He would 
 permit himself to be beleaguered by them, and have 
 to be rescued by the delivering power of (Jod, is more 
 than human credence ought to be asked to believe. 
 
 In the millennium both the righteous and the 
 wicked are to continue to die. If this has not already 
 been made clear, let the reader consider Isa. 65 : 20 : 
 " There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor 
 an old man that hath not tilled his days : for the child 
 shall die an hundred j^^ears old, and the sinner being 
 an hundred years old shall be accursed." Pre-millen- 
 nialists recognize this passage as part of a description 
 of the millennial era. Its teaching is perfectly plain. 
 While life will be prolonged, still both the righteous 
 
 M 
 
THE MILLENNIUM. 
 
 263 
 
 child 
 being 
 illen- 
 ptioii 
 lain. 
 Iteous 
 
 and the unrightcouH nre to di«». We have, tlierefore, 
 through the niinennium, death making its ravages, 
 even as now. If our Lord comes to introduce the 
 millennium, as our pre-millennial friends hold, death 
 is to still maintain its sway over both classes of men, 
 after our Lord comes. This view presents two diffi- 
 culties. If all th(! saints who are to live after those 
 of the generntion in which He comes, are to die as all 
 generations before, how comes it that for this one 
 generation, at His appearing, this rule is reversed, and 
 the living righteous are changed, being thus relieved 
 from the necessity of dying ? Why should the com- 
 ing of Christ in person to the earth be attended with 
 this triumph over death, in the resurrection of dead 
 saints and the change of living saints, if immediately 
 there is to be the reversion back again to the old sub- 
 jection to death ( Will the returning Saviour mani- 
 fest but a flash of resurrection and quickening might, 
 and then, while personally present with His people, 
 hand all the living again over to the power of the 
 last enemy ? Why should there be such discrimina- 
 tion in favor of the one generation which happens to 
 be on the earth at His coming, if immediately the 
 succeeding generations are to be handed over again 
 to His dominion ? Then the resurrection described in 
 1 Cor. 15 is not the resurrection in which this last 
 enemy is destroyed ; his grip is but loosed for a 
 moment, to be tightened again for a thousand years. 
 The event described there is but a hiatus in the rule 
 of death. Where is there any hint of any such thing 
 in the Bible ? 
 
r^ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 204 
 
 Wj 
 
 '0 
 
 A STUDY iN ESCHATUhOUY. 
 
 Itl 
 
 - 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 i 
 
 
 Then it iiiUHt not be for«^otton that our pre-ininen- 
 nial brethren {^ive deliverance From the neceH.sity of 
 dyinj^ as tlie most blesHed part of the bleHsed liope of 
 our Lord's coining — tlie feature wliich lifts it inunea.s- 
 urably aliovc the departing and being with Christ. 
 And yet, in what is to be the supreme blessedness of 
 this golden era, with the Lord in majesty reigning on 
 the earth, and in sight of the multitude of risen and 
 changed saints, the rigliteous who are converted after 
 Christ comes are still to have the king of terrors to 
 face. Why are they left subject to death, now that 
 the Victor over death has once asserted His might ? 
 Why is the glory of this halcyon period marred by 
 this dread monster death, as Pre-millenntalists arc 
 inclined to regard him ? Can it be possible that their 
 view of a release from the need of dying as one of 
 the chief elements, if not the chief one, in the blessed- 
 ness of our Lord's coming, is the true one, if this 
 is not to be realized by those who are saved during 
 all the long period of our Lord's alleged reign on 
 earth i 
 
SOMK tVII.S OK I'HK MIM.KNNIAMSM. 
 
 211.5 
 
 chapti<:r XV. 
 
 SOME EVILS OF PKE-MILLENNIALISM. 
 
 TuUTH is very precious. In our (|ue.st for it wu 
 should spare no pains. All truth is so interdependent 
 tliat indifference to any part of it may make impos- 
 sible the fullest understundin^,^ of it all. A false view 
 of what may l)e thou<(ht a subordinate truth, may 
 distort a whole system of belief. Considerations like 
 these are sufficient to justify the labor ^iven to the 
 preparation of this treatise. There are, however, as 
 the author believes, more specific and practical reasons 
 as \'re\\. There inhere in the pre-millennial system 
 not a few tendencies which are most unfortunate — 
 tendencies which not only affect thought, but also the 
 life of individuals and the general activities of 
 churches in a way that is not good. In this conclud- 
 ing chapter it is proposed to refer to these tendencies 
 as tliey come to light in the course of this discussion, 
 and give them a separate and fuller consideration. 
 The reader is asked to excuse any repetition which 
 this makes necessary. 
 
 Underlying the whole pre-millennial system is the 
 ultra-literal interpretation of the Old Testament 
 
jm 
 
 266 
 
 A STl'DY IN ESCIIATOI-OrJV 
 
 Hfi 
 
 ;ii 
 
 Scriptures, vvliich cotninits Pro-!iiille?inijiliHts to many 
 (M)ncluHi()n.s in contindiction to vvluit .seeiiiH to hv th« 
 plainest toacliinj^H ol' tiic New. '\\\v kin^^doiii of ({(xl 
 or of liojiven jus deHcrilmil in Old 'I'oHtjunent pro- 
 pliocy, literally taken, is to l»e one of material 
 .splendor upon the earth. 'I'hen^fore they hold it is 
 not yet eHtahli.shed, in defiance of the teachin*^ of 
 tlie New Te.stanient. Or, seein*^ that hotii our Lord 
 and .John the Baptist declare the iniinediat(^ estah- 
 lishnient of tlie kin<((loni, in terms too plain to be 
 gainsaid, they assume that their expectation was 
 defeated because the Jews n.'fuseil to accept our Loi'd 
 as Messianic Kin»^, and the inauguration of the kin<(- 
 dom iiad to be deferred to His secon<l coming, lint 
 this compels them to accept these unspeakable con- 
 clusions: Our Lord did not understand Old Testa- 
 ment prophecy respectin<( His tirst comin<(. He was 
 ignorant of the treatment He should receive from the 
 Jews, and it came upon Him as a surprise. His 
 expectation was defeated, and He actually had to 
 change His plan. He at first shared in the false 
 expectation of His followers that He was to mount an 
 earthly throne rather than go to the Cross. Had the 
 Jews received Him, He would not have died and 
 made an atonement for sin. Had the Jews received 
 Him, therefore, salvation would have been without 
 atonement, or an atonement would have been made 
 in some other way. 
 
 This same ultra- literal interpretation also forces 
 them to believe, not only in the restoration of the 
 Jews to their own land, but also that they are to con- 
 
) many 
 l)o tlu; 
 
 of (J()<1 
 
 it pro 
 latcrial 
 il it is 
 iin;j ol' 
 ir lionl 
 OHtal)- 
 1 to be 
 )ii was 
 ir Lord 
 LJ kiii<(- 
 r. Hut 
 
 Ic COIl- 
 
 TcHta- 
 [le was 
 oin the 
 His 
 had to 
 e false 
 unt an 
 a»l the 
 
 1 and 
 ceived 
 'ithout 
 
 made 
 
 forces 
 of the 
 .0 con- 
 
 .^:c)ME KVILS OF rRE-MITJ,ENXIAT,lSM. 
 
 2(17 
 
 stitutc tlu' dominant factor in this kingdom, as our 
 Lord from His capital, Jerusalem, sways His sceptre 
 in excecMliijcr majesty over a subject world, althou;^h 
 I'aid knows of no such distinction for then) in the 
 chapters, Kom. I)- II, in which he traces their future 
 liistory. 
 
 Som»! l*re-milleiwiialists slu'ink hack from otlier 
 conclusi(jns which just as surely follow from this 
 literal interpretation. Others, more logically con- 
 sistent, feel they can do nothin«r else but accept 
 them, while they clin^ to this system of interpreta- 
 tion. They therefore hold, not only that the Jews 
 are to constitute the chief factor in this future kin;^- 
 dom, but that the (Jentiles are to be subject to the 
 Jews. Those who are opposed to the Jews are to be 
 smitten as were the Canaanites of old. The Jewish 
 rites and ceremonies are to be restore<l, and priests 
 and Levites are a<^ain to tread the courts of a temple 
 of transcendent f^lory, and otter sacrifices and observe 
 the feasts and new moons. While perhaps none would 
 be prepared to believe that this perfected Judaism, 
 with all the world proselytes to the Jews or subject 
 to th<'m, is to be the final condition in the milleiniium, 
 ye*, this is the last vision of its fjlory which prophets 
 se(^, and they have no right to stop short of the full 
 conclusion to which this ultra-literal interpretation 
 leads. If it is used to support a theory, it must also 
 be accepted, when it leads to conclusions which sub- 
 vert all our conceptions of the wisdom of the divine 
 plan, by making the climax of the religious pro- 
 

 ll. 
 
 I •■ 
 
 2G8 
 
 A STIJDV IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 fjrcss of the a^jcs a rctrogrcHsion to the .Tiulaism with 
 which it wcll-nigli began. 
 
 It i.s also to be noticed that this scheme of interpre- 
 tation makes it necessary for its advocates to separate 
 tlie splieres covered by Old Testami^it propliecy and 
 New Testament teacliings. So evidently do the pro- 
 phecies of the Old Testament, interpreted in the literal 
 way which alone can give support to tlie pre-millcn- 
 nial theory, refer to altogether different conditions 
 than those contemplated by New Testament writers, 
 that leading Pre-millennialists can only escape; the 
 difficulty by asserting that the Old 'i'estament pro- 
 phets had no visions of the Church and of the gospel 
 dispensation. From our Lord's first coming, with His 
 life, death and resurrection, until His second coming, 
 there is a hiatus in prophecy, Pre-millennialists them- 
 selves being judges. There is no hint of the conditi(m 
 of things the prophets picture, if what they declare 
 is to be taken literally, in the teaching and outlook of 
 the whole New Testament, with the exception of Rev. 
 20 : 1-6, and perhaps an allusion or two in Peter. The 
 thought of New Testament writers was of the con- 
 tinuance of the conditions and agencies then existing 
 in connection with the Church, until the end. Beyond 
 this church condition they saw nothing, expected 
 nothing. Jews and Gentiles were to be equal, and 
 the highest boon for both was to be saved through 
 Christ, as men were being then saved. If, as these 
 brethren admit, Old Testament prophecy, literally 
 taken, was altogether inconsistent with New Testa- 
 ment conditions as declared by its apostles and 
 

 SOME EVILS OF PUE-MILLENXIALISM. 
 
 209 
 
 111 
 
 with 
 
 itcrpre- 
 
 K'paratc 
 
 cy and 
 
 ,hv pro- 
 
 c literal 
 
 -inillcn- 
 
 rulitions 
 
 writers, 
 
 ap(! the 
 
 i>nt pro- 
 
 le gospel 
 
 kvith Hi.s 
 
 comiii;^, 
 
 ts th(Mll- 
 
 :oiiditi()n 
 
 ' declare 
 
 jtlook of 
 
 1 of Rev. 
 
 ,er. The 
 
 the con- 
 
 existing 
 
 Beyond 
 
 expected 
 
 (uai, and 
 
 through 
 
 as these 
 
 literally 
 
 w Testa- 
 
 itles and 
 
 inspired men, so that these prophecies must refer to 
 another period, almost lU contrast, is it not strange 
 the New Testament writers give no hint of being 
 aware of any such Old Testament prediction, or of 
 anticipating an^^ such period ? Now, if the literal is 
 the true interpretation of these prophecies, must not 
 the New Testament wiiters, especially with their 
 inspired insight, luive reached similar conclusions i 
 How comes it, then, that they are silent about it all ? 
 'Nay, how comes it that Paul, with his heart yearning to 
 comfort his people, in the very chapters, Rom. 9-11, 
 in which he traced their future, does not hint at any 
 such pre-eminence as the literal interpretation of the 
 Old Testament gives to them, but makes their con- 
 version the supreme blessing they are to expect ? 
 Why is it that their view of the future of the liistory 
 of redemption ends with the close of the dispensation 
 in which they lived, and the coming of Christ ? We 
 are sure this tendency, fostered by the hyper-literal 
 interpretation, to make Old and New Testament teach- 
 ing irreconcilable, except upon impossible assumptions, 
 is most unwholesome and unsafe. 
 
 This ultra-literal interpretation was once more 
 associated with outbreaks of fanaticism than it is 
 now. It was also once used to secure scriptural 
 justification for persecutions. To it, to-day, we are 
 indebted for several false beliefs which are being 
 pressed with great vigor. It is cniefiy responsible for 
 the materialistic annihilation theory in all its forms 
 Life and death mean just natural and physical, or 
 literal iife and death. When this natural death takes 
 
wm 
 
 270 
 
 A STUDY IN ESniATOLDOY. 
 
 
 , 1 
 
 r 
 
 
 i* 
 
 ■- t 
 
 .■a 
 
 1 t 
 
 * y 
 
 1 t 
 
 ! 5 
 
 ■\ 
 
 ■.\ 
 
 ■^ 
 
 
 ,J 
 
 
 r 
 
 .1 
 
 ' \ 
 
 i 
 
 place, consciouHiieHH ceaHe.s, etc. Ah all spiritual facts 
 must be expressed in terms of the physical, the 
 extreme form of belief based upon the literal inter- 
 pretation is a bald materialism. So also of Seventh 
 Day Adventism. The Sabbath must be the same 
 literal day the Jews celebrated. If there is departure 
 from the seventh day, all the curses against Sabbath - 
 breakin^j found in the Old Testament are upon us. 
 Although Pre-millennialists are not by any means all 
 annihilationists and Sabbatarians, all annihilationists 
 and Sabbatarians are Pre-millennialists, showing that 
 these beliefs are all kindred to each other, in some 
 respects, and share in a common source, which we 
 believe to be the literal interpretation we have 
 been discussing, which makes it more easy for Pre- 
 millennialists to be led away by these and other false 
 doctrines. 
 
 Space will not permit us to pursue this part of our 
 discussion further. 
 
 The pre millennial view of the purpose of the 
 preaching of the Gospel adds to the mystery of God's 
 moral government. It is never to do more than 
 gather out from the great hosts of mankind an elect 
 few. As the ages go by, and as long as the gospel 
 dispensation continues, it is wickedness which is to 
 become more and more dominant and ^/riumphant, and 
 not righteousness. Instead of the Gospel having 
 greater and greater power, and a larger and larger 
 proportion of mankind being saved as a result of its 
 proclamation, it is to have an ever-diminishing 
 influence over those to whom it is proclaimed, and the 
 proportion of saved men, in evangelized lands, shall 
 
 ii!, 
 
SOME EVILS OF PKE-MIIJ<EN\IALISM. 
 
 271 
 
 il fucts 
 il, the 
 inter- 
 leventh 
 e same 
 parture 
 ibbath- 
 pon us. 
 »ans all 
 tionists 
 ne: that 
 n some 
 lich we 
 e have 
 or Fre- 
 er false 
 
 t of onr 
 
 of the 
 f God's 
 re than 
 in elect 
 
 gospel 
 ih is to 
 [int, and 
 
 having 
 J larger 
 t of its 
 inishing 
 and the 
 ds, shall 
 
 never be so small as when Clirist is to appear to end 
 the present dispensation. The preaching of the 
 Gospel, then, is not to bring the nations to the feet of 
 Jesus, finally, for salvation and sanctification : it is 
 proclaimed for a witness. This is its chief purpc^se ; 
 the gathering out of an elect few is but a subordinate 
 result. But what does the preaching for a witness, 
 as distinct from preaching for salvation, really mean ? 
 If its chief purpose is not for salvation, not even 
 for the subduing of wickedness, this must be as a 
 witness against men, to place them under deeper 
 condemnation. 
 
 This is the view held by the Pre-millennialists 
 who express themselves on the question of the preach- 
 ing for a witness. Some would hold it to be to lay a 
 just ground for condemnation. But stated in this 
 form, it implies that the unevangelized are not 
 already under righteous condemnation. It can only 
 be, practically at least, to add to condetnnation, if it 
 be not for salvation. 
 
 But this is not all. One wing of Pre millennialists, 
 convinced by the overwhelming teaching of the 
 New Testament that there is no salvation for any 
 after Christ comes, declare He is to appear to destroy 
 the wicked. The world is to grow worse and worse 
 and be brought under an ever-deepening condemna- 
 tion through the preaching of the Gospel, until the 
 end of the age, and then our Lord, when sin is at its 
 carnival and men's guilt and condemnation are the 
 most dread, is to come and blot the wicked out 
 of the world by His consuming judgments. This 
 
272 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOrjV. 
 
 view is, at least, selF-consistent. It holds that God's 
 dealinf(s throu<j;li the ages, and at the end, are in 
 harmony. 
 
 But most Pre-millennialists hold that at the end 
 of this a<(c, when wickedness is at its worst, and all 
 men have been placed under this deeper condemna- 
 tion through having heard the Gospel, and when the 
 guilt and opposition to Christ are most strong and 
 direful, just then our Lord is to appear, and by the 
 use of a power which must be greater than that 
 in connection with the Gospel, for it succeeds when 
 men are most hardened, when the Gospel failed when 
 they were less depraved, He is to save all the world. 
 Hitherto, throughout unnumbered ages, those who 
 liave rejected the gospel message have perished. 
 Nothing further of power, nothing further of special 
 provision, is vouchsafed them. In this last genera- 
 tion of this .age, however, God abandons His course 
 up to this time. Now, to those who have not only 
 refused the gospel call, but to those who are the most 
 hardened against Christ and deep-dyed in sin of all 
 the generations, He comes with some new and inscrut- 
 able might, or in some grander exercise of a power 
 H has already used, and breaks down this greater 
 opposition, after, for ages, having refused to break 
 down the lesser, and sweeps them all into His king- 
 dom. Whatever mysteries there are in God's moral 
 government, according to any belief — and who that 
 thinks does not acknowledge them ? — tlr's view adds 
 to them indefinite!}', and makes them well-nigh in- 
 soluble. If this dispensation is never to succeed, if 
 
SOME EVILS OF PRE-MILLENNIALISM. 
 
 273 
 
 God's 
 are in 
 
 le end 
 ind all 
 lemna- 
 en the 
 ijj and 
 by the 
 1 that 
 s when 
 1 when 
 world. 
 so who 
 jrished. 
 special 
 3-enera- 
 , course 
 ot onlv 
 le most 
 of all 
 nscrut- 
 power 
 rrreater 
 break 
 R king- 
 s moral 
 lo that 
 w adds 
 igh in- 
 jcecd, if 
 
 
 
 it is foredoomed to end in gloom and failure, if, 
 especially, in addition to failure it is to cast an ever- 
 widening sharlow of deeper condemnation over men, 
 to follow them with its greater curse in the grand 
 and solemn future — why allow this foredoomed 
 failure to bring its greater curse upon men for the 
 eternities during unknown centuries, with their more 
 densely thronging myriads ? We can see but two 
 reasons for its introduction : the first is that it was 
 finally, in the progress of the ages, to bring the 
 mass of mankind to Jesus' feet, which Pre-millennial- 
 ists deny ; the second, that men had to be hardened 
 and made worse, and brought under greater condem- 
 nation, before they could be saved by the transcend- 
 ent power to be revealed in a succeeding dispensation. 
 But who would venture to assume this last? 
 
 The whole teaching about the world growing worse 
 and the preaching of the Gospel as a witness, meaning 
 a witness against all men, is irresistibly toward a view 
 of God most repugnant to all our conceptions of Him, 
 and utterly inconsistent with the statement that " God 
 sent not his Son into the world to judge the world : 
 but that the world should be saved through him " 
 (John 3 : 17). 
 
 This pessimistic view of the purpose and out- 
 come of the gospel dispensation removes one of 
 the chief inspirations to all but one form of 
 Christian effort. Here is an authoritative state- 
 ment of the view, as given by Canon Ryle, and 
 published in the Introduction of the " Pre-millennial 
 Essays " of the great Prophetic Conference of 1879 ; 
 18 
 
m 
 
 i; 
 
 il 
 
 
 ^l 
 
 
 t|. 
 
 )■ 
 i: 
 
 274 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOrJY. 
 
 " I beli«3ve, finally, that it is for the safety, liappine.ss 
 and comfort of all true Christians to expect as little 
 as possible from churches, or governments, under the 
 present dispensation, to hold themselves ready for 
 tremendous conversions and changes of all things 
 established, and to expect their good things only from 
 Christ's Second Advent." 
 
 We are " to expect as little as possible from 
 churches." We are to be in despair of any great 
 result from church work, " under the present dispen- 
 sation." The only hope is in the Second Advent and 
 what it introduces. All the energies of Christians, 
 therefore, should be thrown into the work of hasten- 
 ing His coming. As He is to come " when the gospel 
 has been preached for a witness in all the world," 
 this is the only work which should call forth their 
 best efforts. This is the only work in which they 
 can have the inspiration of assurance of success. 
 
 Now, what is the result of such a view as this upon 
 Christian effort ? It will stimulate the kind of work 
 which is thought to be meant by "preaching the 
 gospel for a witness." This is interpreted by Pre- 
 millennialists generally to mean, giving men an offer 
 of the Gospel. The supreme consideration will then 
 be to reach all men, as soon as possible, with an offer 
 of the Gospel. This is what Post-millennialists and 
 Pre-millennialists alike believe should be done. But 
 when it comes to the reasons why we are to strive to 
 do this, they part company. Pre-millennialists, to be 
 consistent with this statement of their view by Canon 
 Ryle, do not seek to reftch ftU men with the Gospel, 
 
SOME EVILS OF PRE-MILLENNIAT,ISM. 
 
 275 
 
 upon 
 work 
 ig the 
 Pre- 
 offer 
 1 then 
 n offer 
 ts and 
 But 
 rive to 
 ,to be 
 Canon 
 
 in order that tliey may be saved throu<jh it. They 
 are " to expect as little as possilile from cliurclies," 
 and that which the churches are doing. They are not, 
 then, to expect " to make disciples of all the nations." 
 The Gospel is preached with the great aim of fulfilling 
 the condition of Christ's coming, which is thought to 
 be that all the nations have at least one offei* of the 
 Gospel, not that they are generally to be saved 
 through the Gospel. 
 
 Now, what will be the natural results of these two 
 conceptions of the aim and outcome of the Gospel 
 upon the methods adopted ? Post-millennialists, 
 believing that the purpose of the Gospel is to save 
 men, and that it is to make steady progress until the 
 glad time is reached when men generally shall be in 
 this blessed state, will organize their work, and settle 
 down for the long aujl conquering campaign of the 
 ages. While they will wish to reach all men with the 
 Gospel, they will also study to occupy the ground as 
 they go on to the ends of the earth, and entrench 
 themselves for the long, hand-to-hand struggle. 
 Expecting triumph through present agencies, they 
 will make the most of them, trusting to God to fill 
 them with His own effectual power. 
 
 Pre-millennialists, however, expecting little from 
 the preaching of the Gospel, and placing all their 
 dependence in the coming of the Lord, will rather 
 seek to cover the world than plan to possess and hold 
 it. If the Gospel can but be proclaimed so that all 
 may have the opportunity of hearing it, then Christ 
 will come and do all the rest. The work will bo 
 

 Aw 
 
 > ■ 
 
 '■■A : ■ ( 
 
 r-i 
 
 1 I 
 
 ii 
 
 i 
 
 
 i ' ! 
 t 
 
 i ' 
 
 i 
 
 ■ 
 
 276 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOOY. 
 
 planned on a more Huporficial hasiH. The ability of 
 the inisHionarieH aiul their eijuipincmt ior their work 
 will be of Hniall moment. Their cliief work is to 
 reach as many an poHHi})le with the offer of tlie (jo.spel, 
 and almo.st anyone can help do that. They are not to 
 .settle down and grapple with lieathenism very seri- 
 onsly ; for only comparatively few of them are ever to 
 be .saved by the Gospel, and the Ijord will see that the 
 elect few will be brought in, in siilx)rdi nation to the 
 great purpo.se of hastening His coming. Some men of 
 larger calibre will be needed to direct; Vjut, for the 
 most part, inferior men and women, with poor train- 
 ing at that, will do. So, also, the need of organizing the 
 work on the foreign field will be chiefly to continue the 
 preaching of the Gospel for a witness, where it is 
 thought this is necessary. If it is thought, especially, 
 that tlie rest of the ground which has not had the 
 Gospel as a witness, can be covered without any 
 further organization of the work in the rear, it will 
 naturally not be attempted, as it would divert ener- 
 gies from the work which is supreme. 
 
 The natural tendencies of the pre-millennial view, 
 as outlined above, have .shaped, very largely, the char- 
 acter of the methods and work of all mis.sions under 
 its auspices. While other mission societies have 
 thought that the strongest and best equipped men 
 were needed to grapple with heathenism on the 
 foreign field, those under pre-millennial control send 
 out men whose mental ability and training are not 
 sufficient to qualify them to be pastors of our churches 
 »t home, which m^ke l^ast demjinds. AH t^o little 
 

 SOME KVILS OK rUE-MILLENNIAI.I.SM. 
 
 277 
 
 attention is uIho ^ivon to the organization of tlie work 
 on tlie i'or('i<^n fiehl. Ah the (Jospel is preaclied to a 
 lar<;er proportion of niankin<l, and it is tliou<;ht tliat 
 the Lord's coming is drawing nearer, the tendency 
 will be to neglect this more and more. The different 
 policies which are the natnral outcome of the two 
 views, lift the issue between them above one of 
 mere academic interest, and make it of very vital 
 importance. 
 
 But this pessimistic view of the purpose and out- 
 come of the gospel dispensation, wl\en it is intelli- 
 gently held, has a tremendous bearing upon the 
 inspirations for Christian work. The soldiers who 
 know they are fighting a losing battle, cannot struggle 
 so manfully as those who know they are gradually 
 pressing back the foe to final and irretrievable defeat. 
 Men who feel the conflict the Church of God is waging 
 with sin, is to accomplish but little, and that sin is to 
 grow stronger and more triumphant during all her 
 long struggle can scarcely have the best heart for the 
 supremest effort. It is true, they may feel that it is 
 the will of their Lord that they should thus fight 
 this losing battle, and this ought to afford the highest 
 inspiration : but how much greater would it be, were 
 they to know that their Lord both wished them to 
 struggle, and also gave them assurance of final 
 triumph ! 
 
 Not supposing God intends to do much through the 
 preaching of the Gospel and its associated agencies in 
 this dispensation, they cannot have faith to ask great 
 things from God ; expecting less to be accomplished, 
 
278 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLCJCiY. 
 
 .1 
 
 ; 
 
 ! -1 
 
 ! 
 
 I 
 
 they are inoro readily satisHetl with sinall results. If 
 wickediioHs i;row j'reater and more aj'i'reHsive, even 
 if tlieir work be losing ground, this nuiy be accepted 
 as an evidence of the correctiu'ss of their view instead 
 of stimulating to greater en<leavor to resist and drive 
 back the ti<Ie of evil which is tloodinij their conuuu- 
 nity or country. Expecting the world to grow worse, 
 they are tempted to make tlie most of every unfavor- 
 able symi)tom, and the least of what might be titted 
 to give courage. 
 
 On the home Held, where all have had an otter of 
 the (j}os))el, and the preaching for a witness, as they 
 suppose, has been accomplished, the chief work of the 
 Church havinij been done, the natural result would 
 be to cease the most earnest effort, especially as it 
 might be thought that sufficient had also been done 
 to be God's means for gathering in the elect few. 
 Apart from the sending forth of missionaries, the 
 work of the Cliurch might be thought well-nigh done 
 in the most of the communities in a Christian land 
 like this. Mrs. Guinness, that lady of great mind 
 and heart, saw the natural outcome of her pre- 
 millennial views. In a Conference in England she 
 told the assembled ministers that the Gospel had been 
 preached for a witness already in their favored land. 
 The one thing the Christians of England had to do 
 was to hasten the Lord's coming for the salvation of 
 the nations, by going to the unevangelized portions 
 of the earth to give the people there the offer of 
 the Gospel, and thus complete the condition of His 
 appearing. 
 
SOME KVILS OF PUE-MIM.KNNIAMSM. 
 
 279 
 
 Wliilc we may be ^latl that all our pre-milleniiial 
 luetliren are not so loj^ically conHistent with their 
 views as was she, this is nevertheless its logical out- 
 come, so far as the writer can see, and it is one which 
 may well convince us that more is involved also in 
 this difference between Pre-millennialists and Post- 
 millennialists than a rather unimportant question of 
 interpretation. 
 
 Chief reliance for motive power upon a belief 
 in the perpetual inniiinence of our Lord's coming 
 which Pre-millennialism encourages, is another unfor- 
 tunate feature of this view. Reference has already 
 been made to the difficulty of reconciling this doctrine 
 of the perpetual inuninence of Christ's coming with 
 the divine veracity. The teaching of the New Testa- 
 ment is thought to be carefully adapted to give to 
 each generation the impression that Christ's coming 
 may be just at hand. Tliis expectation, which our 
 heavenly Father knew was to be a false one for all the 
 generations except the last, He nevertheless inspired 
 the scripture writers to give : so that all generations 
 might have the inspiration of the thought that 
 the Lor<l might appear at any moment. Now, the 
 motive power of the thought of His coming, on pre- 
 millennial principles, must be in proportion as this 
 transcendent event is thought, really, to be at hand. 
 God has therefore arranged it, that, for all but one 
 generation, men shall be moved to be faithful to Him 
 in proportion as they can cherish an illusive and false 
 expectation. Can such a view be intelligently held, 
 and not encourage the most unworthj^ thought of 
 
A4 
 
 ^. 
 
 ^> 
 
 A/. 
 
 .oQ. 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 7 
 
 A 
 
 {./ 
 
 V 
 
 <^\% 
 
 ^ Jj. ^^^ 
 
 bi^ 
 
 :/. 
 
 fA 
 
 ^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 1 5 " 
 
 1112 
 
 li 
 
 !|uo 
 
 — 6" 
 
 IM 
 
 2.0 
 
 111= 
 
 U IIIIII.6 
 
 ^' 
 
 ^ 
 
 /} 
 
 'e^. 
 
 W 
 
 % 
 
 
 # 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 >^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 i\ 
 
 iV 
 
 %^ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 \\ 
 
 
 
 
*. 
 
 %' 
 
 '4^^ 
 
 L.l- 
 
 1^ 
 
 vV 
 
 *• 
 
280 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 ■m. 
 
 :J : : ■■■'* 
 
 God ? Can a view which seems to reflect so darkly 
 upon the veracity of God be true ? Can such a 
 thought of God be encouraged and the robust truth 
 and sincerity of Christian character not be greatly 
 weakened ? 
 
 If there is any solid ground for the higher motive 
 power of the imminence of His coming, over and 
 above its certainty, it must be because it assures to 
 those who are alive when He appears some trans- 
 cendent blessing which those who die before this time 
 are not to have. But why should God so discrimi- 
 nate in favor of one generation, without apparent 
 reason ? For all others He holds this out as an 
 illusive expectation which will lead to disappointment 
 as keen as the expectation was great. To one genera- 
 tion alone is there to be the fruition of the blessed 
 hope which has but tantalized all the others. Are 
 God's ways thus unequal ? 
 
 But what can be the special advantage as a motive 
 power of the expectation that Christ may come any 
 day, over the assurance that He is certainly to appear, 
 and that His coming will bring the same blessing 
 whether in the body or out of the body ? It is all 
 staked upon His coming before death ; for, when once 
 we die, it makes little difference whether He come 
 the next day or a thousand years after the spirit 
 leaves the body. We shall be satisfied in the glory 
 of His presence. Neither can it be held that the 
 saints who have died before His advent shall not 
 share as fully as those who are alive, in all that His 
 appearing is to be and to bring. The one advantage 
 
SOMIS EVILS OF PUE-MILLKNNIATilSM. 
 
 281 
 
 come 
 
 to those who are alive then, is the deliverance from 
 physical death. Is this so wondrous a salvation as 
 to make it worthy to be exalted as the chief motive 
 power, even though this could only be done by 
 encouraging a delusive expectation, in so many gen- 
 erations ? Emphasis is given to this question when 
 we consider all there is in death to alarm the saint 
 who would welcome the personal appearing of the 
 Lord. To him there can be no dread but only joy in 
 the thought of meeting Christ, whether in the body 
 or in spirit. There remains nothing in death, then, 
 for him to dread, but death itself. The rational basis, 
 therefore, of the blessed hope of Christ's coming 
 which is built upon its nearness rather than its cer- 
 tainty, is reduced to the mere deliverance from 
 the pains of dying. But Christians are not such 
 cravens as to make this the great hope which is to 
 give them chief inspiration to faithfulness. Can we 
 suppose the view is scriptural or wholesome which 
 would make God attach such tremendous importance 
 to so small a thing ? 
 
 Notice, also, that there is a conflict in motives in 
 the pre-millennial view. The motive to Christian 
 work — especially in that of foreign missions — is to 
 hasten the coming of the Lord by fulfilling the con- 
 dition of preaching the Gospel for a witness in all 
 nations. The motive to this can only be operative 
 as it is thought this condition is not fulfilled, and His 
 coming is not imminent. On the other hand, it is 
 taught only as His coming is thought to be at hand, 
 that there can be the highest motive to general faith- 
 
' 1 
 
 f ' 
 
 ^^ I 
 
 
 
 .1. i\ '' \ 
 
 1 
 
 fei: 
 
 282 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 fulness. If it is believed there are countries in which 
 the Gospel has not yet been preached for a witness, 
 then the necessary condition of His coming is not yet 
 fulfilled, and His coming cannot be thought at hand. 
 ]f, on the other hand, it is thought His coming may 
 occur before night, it can only be upon the assumption 
 that the Gospel has been preached in all the world for 
 a witness, and this work is ended. If inspiration of 
 the highest kind is received from the one, it is at the 
 expense of the inspiration from the other. No rea- 
 sonable man can both be quickened to general fidelity 
 by the thought that Christ is immediately to appear, 
 and also be led to strain every energy to oflTer the 
 Gospel to some unevangelized tribe or nation because 
 this must be done before He can appear. Can our 
 Lord intend us to be moved, at the same moment, by 
 both the motives, that His coming is at hand and is 
 not at hand I There seems no escape from the 
 dilemma. Either hold His coming not to be at hand, 
 and be inspired to faithfulness in the work of hasten- 
 ing His advent, or hold His coming to be at hand, 
 and abandon the motive that the Gospel must be sent 
 to some unevangelized country before He can come. 
 The view which involves this irreconcilable conflict 
 of motives, must be wrong in one or other of its 
 positions, if not in both. 
 
 In any case, chief dependence for motive upon what 
 is so vague and uncertain as the time of the Lord's 
 coming, rather than upon its certainty, and upon 
 what it will be equally to all aaints, whether in the 
 body or disembodied, cannot but be unwholesome 
 
SOME EVILS OF PUE-MILLENNIAJ.ISM. 
 
 283 
 
 The motive power must be as uncertain and unsteady 
 as tliat which is relied upon to furnish it. It encour- 
 ages the sensuous to tlie disregard, in some measure, 
 at least, of the spiritual. Christ's coming in material 
 and visible splendor and might is exalted above our 
 going to be with Him in the spiritual fellowship of 
 the spirit state. 
 
 Finally, the disproportionate importance given to 
 the pre- millennial view by so many of those holding 
 it, is leading to practical difficulties, and may threaten 
 graver dangers. They feel compelled, because of their 
 conviction of its great consequence, to press it with 
 great vigor, whenever opportunity offers. At the 
 same time, they are very impatient if anything is 
 said in opposition to tb' 'r special opinion on this 
 subject. To a large proportion of them, the preach- 
 ing which does not contain it, or which even does not 
 give it chief emphasis, is deemed very unsatisfactory. 
 In churches containing a large element of this class, it 
 naturally happens, if a pastor is to be called, only 
 one who is prepared to lay stress upon this view can 
 receive their hearty support. If one who holds an 
 opposite view is chosen, there is dissatisfaction, and 
 often trouble, if he preaches freely what he and the 
 great majority of the church believe. Many of them 
 will often absent themselves from services of their 
 own churches, to seek elsewhere the preaching 
 which gives emphasis to the view which has so large 
 a place in their esteem. In missionary operations, 
 they are in heartiest sympathy with missions under 
 pre-millenniul auspices, and a large part of their 
 
h 
 
 284i 
 
 A STUDY IN ESCHATOLOGY. 
 
 iiSliiiil 
 
 ijl 
 
 ::i 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 ; i 
 
 
 
 1 1 
 
 
 ;i 
 
 I ' 
 
 i I 
 
 
 
 beneficence will be diverted from the work of their 
 own body into these treasuries. In proportion as 
 their special view is magnified, will they be disposed 
 to seek their closest fellowship with those sharing it 
 with them, and the bands binding them to their 
 denomination, through kindred views in other respects, 
 will be weakened. In some cases it is becoming very 
 difficult for those who do not hold pre-millennial 
 views, to work harmoniously with the more extreme 
 Pre-millennialists, in the same church, unless by 
 yielding to them more than they ought to be 
 expected to do. While there are many who do not 
 magnify this view out of all proportion to its com- 
 parative importance, and who throw their best ener- 
 gies in all loyalty into the work of the churches and 
 the denominations to which they belong, there are 
 also many of the more extreme Pre-millennialists 
 whose sympathies, contributions and efforts are 
 diverted elsewhere. The various denominations may 
 well regard the drift of many of their members into 
 that form of Pre millennialism with much concern. 
 
 My work is done. If even unconsciously I have 
 wrested any Scripture from its most natural interpre- 
 tation, or, if I have not maintained the true spirit of 
 Christian gentleness and the humility of one who is 
 seeking after truth rather than to support a theory, 
 I ask pardon of God and also of ray brethren. This 
 little treatise, in all its imperfection, is sent forth in 
 the hope that it may be of some service to the cause 
 of truth. 
 
 «f 
 
. ' I 
 
 ►f tlieir 
 tioii as 
 inposed 
 iring it 
 o their 
 espects, 
 ig very 
 llennial 
 sxtreiiie 
 ess by 
 to be 
 do not 
 bs corn- 
 et ener- 
 hes and 
 ere are 
 inialiats 
 rts are 
 ins may 
 ers into 
 cern. 
 
 I have 
 iterpre- 
 ipirit of 
 ! who is 
 
 theory, 
 I. This 
 orth in 
 le cause 
 
 INDEX TO SCRIPTURE TEXTS. 
 
 
 Oenesis. 
 
 
 
 InAiAH— Continued. 
 
 17 : 7, 8 
 
 . 
 
 PAOB 
 - 113 
 
 64 
 
 : 1-3 
 
 
 PAOK 
 
 - 175 
 
 22 : 18 - 
 
 • 
 
 - 114 
 
 65 
 
 : 29- 
 
 . 
 
 1 1 t» 
 
 - 255 
 
 26 : 3-5 
 
 . 
 
 - 114 
 
 66 
 
 : 20-24 
 
 ^ 
 
 - 95 
 
 35 : 12 - 
 
 T^l 
 
 - 114 
 
 
 
 Jeremiah. 
 
 t/t/ 
 
 20 : 24 - 
 33 : 5 - 
 
 JiXODUS. 
 
 Leviticus. 
 
 - 175 
 
 - 175 
 
 31 
 33 
 33 
 
 : 31-34 
 : 17, 18 
 :21 - 
 
 EZEKIEL. 
 
 ■ 132 
 96, 117 
 
 ■ 117 
 
 7 : 13 - 
 23: 15-17 
 
 - 
 
 - 250 
 
 - 250 
 
 37 
 37 
 
 : 12-14 
 : 26, 27 
 
 
 - 83 
 
 - 95 
 
 
 2 Samuel. 
 
 
 37 
 
 : 28- 
 
 - 
 
 - 96 
 
 7 : 12- 
 22 : 10 - 
 
 ■ - 117 
 
 • • • 
 
 , 121 
 - 175 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 Daniel. 
 
 
 
 
 
 7 
 
 14 - 
 
 - - • 
 
 - 96 
 
 
 Psalms. 
 
 
 7 
 
 . 
 
 - - - 
 
 - 143 
 
 2 
 
 - - . 
 
 - 96 
 
 12 
 
 2 - 
 
 . 
 
 17 aq. 
 
 16 : ]0 
 
 - 
 
 ■ 120 
 
 
 
 
 
 50:3- 
 
 - • • 
 
 ■ 175 
 
 
 
 Joel. 
 
 
 80:2- 
 
 - - - 
 
 • 175 
 
 1 ■ 
 
 16- 
 
 - 
 
 ■ 175 
 
 89 : 4- 
 
 " " • 
 
 • 117 
 
 2 
 
 11 - 
 
 . 
 
 - 175 
 
 110 : 1 - 
 
 • - . 
 
 121 
 
 3 
 
 11 - 
 
 - 
 
 - 33 
 
 144 :5 - 
 
 - 
 
 175 
 
 
 
 Amos. 
 
 
 
 Isaiah. 
 
 
 5: 
 
 18-20 
 
 - 
 
 - 176 
 
 2: 12- 
 
 • " • • 
 
 175 
 
 
 
 
 
 14 : 1, 2 
 
 • - - 
 
 96 
 
 
 
 MiCAH. 
 
 
 19: 1 - 
 
 - - - . 
 
 176 
 
 1 : 
 
 3-5 
 
 * - ~ • 
 
 - 176 
 
 35 :4 - 
 
 - 
 
 176 
 
 4: 
 
 7 - 
 
 • • • 
 
 - 96 
 
 49 : 23 - 
 
 " • • • 
 
 96 
 
 
 
 
 
 54 : 1 . 
 
 * * V ■ 
 
 131 
 
 
 Zephakiab. 
 
 
 eO ; 12, 14 
 
 f » • 
 
 96 
 9 
 
 1 : 
 <5 
 
 1 ' 
 
 ; » ! 
 
 'm 
 
286 
 
 INDEX TO SCRIPTURK TEXTS. 
 
 ' ' i ' 'iiM& 
 
 ^ 
 
 :M:(H 
 
 i 
 
 , , f ; ^-'^^^H 
 
 
 ^ ■'; ; >.:fij^^i 
 
 
 s^l ll ' * ■ ""l'^' 
 
 
 SS!;;Si: ■'':-: ■ 
 
 jlll'i|i-'-'i 
 
 ^^glyi 
 
 r 
 
 
 
 Zr.ru 
 
 ariaii. 
 
 MATFUV.w—Oonlinue.t/. 
 
 
 
 
 ■ ■A(IK 
 
 
 l-AOK 
 
 
 14 : 5 . 
 
 - 
 
 - 160 
 
 25 : I 13 
 
 - 65 
 
 
 14 : 1« - 
 
 - 
 
 - 95, 98 
 
 25 : 31-49 - 
 
 26 : 29 - 
 
 29 sq., 54 
 - 108 
 
 
 
 Malachi. 
 
 28 : 18 - 
 
 - 103 
 
 
 4:6 - 
 
 - 
 
 ■ 175 
 
 28 : 19, 20 - 
 
 54, 144, 216 
 
 
 
 Matthew. 
 
 Mark. 
 
 
 
 3:1- 
 
 
 - 136 
 
 8 : 38 - 
 
 . 39 
 
 . 
 
 3 : 3 - 
 
 
 - 102 
 
 13 : 35 - 
 
 - 140 
 
 i 
 
 3 : 39, 40, 
 
 49 
 
 - 116 
 
 
 • 
 
 1 
 
 t 
 
 4:17- 
 
 
 - J36 
 
 LUKK, 
 
 
 
 r> : 1012 
 
 
 - 105 
 
 9:2- 
 
 - 105 
 
 ' 
 
 5 : 20 - 
 
 
 - 104 
 
 10 : 9 - 
 
 - 102 
 
 
 6 : 19- 
 
 
 - 105 
 
 10:11- 
 
 - 136 
 
 
 7 : 22, 23 
 
 
 - 40, 213 
 
 10 : 15 - 
 
 - 213 
 
 
 8 : 11, 12 
 
 
 • 106 
 
 12 : 32 - 
 
 - 106 
 
 
 9 : 35 - 
 
 
 - 136 
 
 12 : 38 - 
 
 - 140 
 
 
 10 : 7 - 
 
 
 - 102, i36 
 
 12 : 43 «/. - 
 
 - 179 
 
 ; 
 
 10:15- 
 
 
 - 213 
 
 15 : 32 - 
 
 - 83 
 
 10 : 23 - 
 
 
 - 141, 183 
 
 16 : 16 - 
 
 ■ 101 
 
 10 : 32, 33 
 
 
 - 40 
 
 17 : 21 - 
 
 - 104 
 
 i 
 
 11 : 21, 22 
 
 
 - 213 
 
 17 : 26, 27 - 
 
 - 239 
 
 
 12 : 30 - 
 
 
 - 212 
 
 18 : 8 - 
 
 - 239 
 
 :j 
 
 I 13 : 19 • 
 
 
 - 105 
 
 19 : 13 - 
 
 87 sq. 147 
 
 
 ; 13 : 30-43 
 
 
 - 41, 54 
 
 19 : 12-27 - 
 
 - 41, 55 
 
 ; ; 
 
 13 : 31, 32 
 
 
 - 144, 244 sq. 
 
 21 : 24 - 
 
 - 78, 143 
 
 13 : 33 - 
 
 
 - 247 .^7. 
 
 21 : 21-33 - 
 
 - 165 
 
 i- 
 
 16:18- 
 
 
 - 136 
 
 21 : 36 . 
 
 - 166 
 
 ' [ 
 
 i 16:19- 
 
 
 - 101 
 
 22 : 29, 30 - 
 
 - 108 
 
 '[ 
 
 i 16:27- 
 
 
 - 39 
 
 26 : 35 - 
 
 - 86 
 
 \ 
 
 i 16 : 28 - 
 
 
 - 141, 182, 194 
 
 
 
 ■ 1 
 
 18 : 4 - 
 
 
 - 104 
 
 John. 
 
 
 i if: 
 
 18 : 17- 
 
 
 - 136 
 
 3 : 3-5 
 
 - 104 
 
 :!? 
 
 19 : 16-25 
 
 
 - 101 
 
 3 : 17 - 
 
 - 229 
 
 ■ '■ 
 
 19 : 28 - 
 
 
 - 109 
 
 3 : 21 - 
 
 - 78 
 
 ' 
 
 21 : 43 - 
 
 
 . 110 
 
 5 : 25 - 
 
 13 sq. 
 
 
 2-2 : 31 - 
 
 
 - 86 
 
 5 : 28, 29 - 
 
 12 sq., 66 
 
 
 23 : 13 - 
 
 
 - 102 
 
 6 : 39 - 
 
 - 158, 212 
 
 
 24 : 3 - 
 
 
 - 145, 216 
 
 6 : 40, 44 - 
 
 - 212 
 
 
 24 : 14 - 
 
 
 - 144, 183, 227 
 
 9:4- 
 
 - 211 
 
 
 24 : 15 - 
 
 
 - 181 
 
 10 : 17-23 - 
 
 - 105 
 
 ; 
 
 24 : 27 - 
 
 
 - 170 
 
 11 :24- 
 
 - 212 
 
 
 24 : 36 - 
 
 
 - 140 
 
 12 : 48 - 
 
 - 212 
 
 
 24 : 37-51 
 
 
 - 189 sq. 
 
 14 : 3 - 
 
 - 160 
 
 j 
 
 24 : 37, 38 
 
 
 . 239 
 
 14 : 1-4 
 
 - 178 
 
 
 24 : 42-44 
 
 
 - 140 
 
 14 ! 18, 23 . 
 
 - 184 
 
 
 24 ! 47-51 
 
 
 - 179 
 
 16 : 16-22 . 
 
 - 184 
 
 
 25 : 16 
 
 • 
 
 . 162 
 
 16 : 33 ■ 
 
 • 238 
 
xq. 
 
 I'AOK 
 tit I 
 
 „ .'>4 
 108 
 lO.'i 
 *21G 
 
 - .39 
 
 - 140 
 
 105 
 102 
 130 
 21.3 
 106 
 140 
 179 
 
 8.3 
 101 
 1U4 
 239 
 239 
 147 
 
 55 
 143 
 165 
 166 
 108 
 
 86 
 
 104 
 229 
 
 78 
 
 13 
 
 aq 
 
 sq. 
 , 66 
 212 
 212 
 211 
 105 
 212 
 212 
 160 
 178 
 184 
 184 
 238 
 
 INDEX TO SCRIPTURE TEXTS. 
 
 287 
 
 3 ow^ —Continued. 
 
 17 : .32 - 
 
 19 : .3(5 - 
 
 21 : 18, 19, 22, 23 
 
 2(5 : 23 - 
 
 Acts. 
 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 3 
 5 
 5 
 
 13 
 
 14 
 
 15 
 
 15 
 
 15 ; 
 
 17 
 
 28 : 
 
 28 ; 
 
 1 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 4 
 6 
 8 
 9 
 
 17- 
 
 26-28 
 
 .34 36 
 
 19 21 
 
 29-31 
 
 31 - 
 
 46- 
 
 22- 
 
 14-16 
 
 15- 
 
 14-18 
 
 31 
 
 15- 
 
 23, 28 
 
 ■16 
 
 229 
 181 
 
 I'AOK, 
 
 86 
 104 
 146 
 
 85 
 
 236 
 120 
 227 
 144 
 121 
 224 
 110 
 107 
 164 
 122 
 .V7. 
 41 
 xq. 
 110 
 
 Romans, 
 
 10- 
 
 28, 29 
 
 16- 
 
 13- 
 
 23- 
 
 24-27 
 Chaps. 9-11 
 10 : 18-24 
 
 17 nq. 
 
 2632 
 
 17- 
 
 9-13 
 
 11 
 11 
 U 
 
 15 
 
 - 86 
 37 xq. 
 
 ■ 293 
 
 - 212 
 
 - 115 
 
 - 116 
 
 - 83 
 
 - 165 
 
 - 131 
 126 sq. 
 
 - 132 
 
 - 125 
 78, 133, 144, 233 nq. 
 
 ■ 104 
 
 - 1.33 
 
 1 Corinthians. 
 
 1 : 
 3 : 
 
 5 : 
 
 6 : 
 11 : 
 15 : 
 15 : 
 15: 
 15 I 
 
 7,8 
 
 13- 
 
 5 - 
 
 2 - 
 
 26- 
 
 12-42 
 
 22,23 
 
 23-26 
 
 60. 
 
 168, 184, 213 
 
 - 212 
 
 - 213 
 
 - 109 
 m, 188 
 
 - 87 
 57, 66 
 
 • 123 
 . 109 
 
 1 C<)RINTIIIANH-6'o»/l//m7/. 
 
 15 : 51, .52 
 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 3 
 3 
 
 1 
 1 
 1 
 2 
 2 
 3 
 3 
 3 
 4 
 
 1 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 I'.WJK 
 
 15 
 
 16 
 
 1 
 4 
 5 
 6 
 
 5(5 - 
 2 - 
 
 16, 6(5, 170, 188 
 
 ■ 67, 177 
 
 - 186 
 
 2 Corinthians. 
 14 - 
 
 14 .y7. . 
 
 9, 10 . - . 
 16-18 - 
 
 Galatians. 
 
 3 : 16, 28, 29 - 
 
 4 : 21-31 - 
 
 213 
 
 89 
 209 
 135 
 
 115 
 
 EI'HESIANS. 
 
 7 - 
 11-19 
 17- 
 5-9 
 6 - 
 
 - 131 
 
 1.19 
 116 
 184 
 129 
 116 
 
 PniLIPPIANS. 
 
 6, 10 
 9, 10 
 2.S : 
 9, 10 
 16- 
 3 - 
 11 - 
 20,21 
 5 - 
 
 187, 
 147, 
 
 - 86, 
 
 - 104, 
 
 COLOSSIANS. 
 
 13- 
 18- 
 16- 
 11 - 
 
 1 Thessalonians. 
 
 1 : 7-10 
 3 : 13- 
 14- 
 16- 
 15-19 
 15- 
 17- 
 2-4 
 23. 
 
 184, 186 
 
 - 16 
 160, 163, 170 
 
 213 
 174 
 177 
 103 
 213 
 115 
 88 
 184 
 140 
 
 104 
 
 86 
 
 135 
 
 113 
 
 213 
 160 
 66 
 67 
 188 
 174 
 147 
 213 
 
 147 
 
288 
 
 INDEX TO SORIPTTTRE TEXTS. 
 
 1 ; 
 ■V 
 
 r'f. 
 ■f 
 
 ', 
 
 i 
 
 
 rf' 
 
 
 s 
 
 i 
 
 « 
 
 
 .f. 
 
 
 .i' 
 
 ; 
 
 ■ i' 
 
 f 
 
 ■ij: 
 
 ■! 
 
 i' 
 
 1 
 
 
 4' 
 
 
 "■4 . 
 
 J 
 
 #i 
 
 i 
 
 •iJi 
 
 
 'A'/! > 
 
 
 * .,^.1 
 
 2 TlIKSSALoNIANS, 
 
 l-AOK 
 
 1 : 4, 5 - ■ 107 
 
 Sf) .sf/., r)4, 244 
 - 109 
 144, 140, \m 
 ■ 213 
 
 1 
 1 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 2 
 
 0-10 
 7 - 
 1-12 
 2 - 
 3-10 
 8-12 
 
 1 TtMOTHV. 
 
 4: 1 
 6 : 14 
 
 2 TlMOTIIV. 
 
 1 : 12, 18 
 
 2 : 12 ■ 
 
 3 : 1 sq. 
 
 3 : 12 - 
 4:7- 
 4:8- 
 
 4 : 18- 
 
 2 : 12, 13 
 
 2 : 14, 15 
 8:6sq. 
 9 : 24-28 
 10 : 12, 13 
 10 : 25 - 
 10 : 37 - 
 
 5:3- 
 5:7-9 
 
 1 : 7-13 
 1 : 10-12 
 
 TiTDS. 
 
 Hkbrkws. 
 
 240 sr/. 
 - f.5 
 
 - 236 
 174, 187 
 
 - 213 
 ■ 107 
 
 236 sq. 
 
 - 238 
 
 - 177 
 • 213 
 
 - 105 
 
 185 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 177 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 132 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 57 
 
 
 
 . 122, 
 
 225 
 
 
 
 
 213 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 140 
 
 James. 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 . 
 
 237 
 
 - 141, 147 
 
 174, 
 
 187 
 
 1 Peter. 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 . 
 
 168 
 
 • 
 
 
 B ■ 
 
 135 
 
 1 Vktkk ('(mfiniied. 
 
 2 : 5-9 
 4:7- 
 
 TAua 
 130 
 191 
 
 2 Pkter. 
 
 11 
 
 1 : 12 ] 
 
 2 :9 
 
 3 : 3 
 3:7 
 3 : 10 
 3 : II, 12 
 3 : 3-13 
 
 JUDE. 
 
 14, 15 
 
 - 105 
 146, 209 
 
 - 213 
 
 - 236 
 
 - 213 
 213, 256 
 
 - 185 
 51 w/. 
 
 ■ 160 
 
 Revelation. 
 
 2 : 5, 16 
 
 2 : 10, 25 
 3:3- 
 
 3 : 10 - 
 3 : 11 - 
 3 : 20- 
 
 5 : 10- 
 
 6 : 9-11 
 11 : 18- 
 13 : 16 - 
 
 18 : 24 ■ 
 
 19 :2 - 
 19 : 5, 18 
 
 19 : 11 aq. 
 
 20 : 4-6 
 20 : 7-10 
 20 : 11-15 
 22 :5 ■ 
 22 : 20- 
 
 141, 
 
 141, 
 108, 
 
 65, 70, 
 
 176 
 
 181 
 
 176 
 
 166 
 
 181 
 
 184 
 
 108 
 
 79 
 
 22 
 
 22 
 
 22 
 
 71 Sq. 
 
 24, 59 nq. 
 
 82, 253 aq. 
 
 21 aq. 
 
 . 73 
 
 - 141 
 
^■■■i 
 
 
 i'AOR 
 
 . 
 
 130 
 
 • 
 
 191 
 
 
 105 
 
 146, 
 
 209 
 
 ■ 
 
 213 
 
 . 
 
 236 
 
 ■ 
 
 213 
 
 >13, 
 
 256 
 
 ■ 
 
 185 
 
 51 
 
 .w/. 
 
 160 
 
 41, 
 
 181 
 
 
 176 
 
 
 166 
 
 41, 
 
 181 
 
 08, 
 
 184 
 
 
 108 
 
 70, 
 
 79 
 
 
 22 
 
 
 22 
 
 
 <u 
 
 
 bo 
 
 
 22 
 
 71 
 
 S(/. 
 
 59 
 
 sq. 
 
 253 
 
 sq. 
 
 21 
 
 sq. 
 
 - 
 
 73 
 
 ■ 
 
 141