te^S CANADA 
 
 
 ^ U'^^m^^ FOR 
 
 i Use'^iife CANADIANS 
 
 dak an^jiiLij^u-j U; ilK 
 
 E. B. Eddy's 
 
 
 Matches 
 
 
 iSlMi THEY ARE || 
 THE BEST 
 
 /i 
 
PRICE FIFTY CENTS. 
 
 Of 
 
 Coronto 
 
 ClK 
 
 600(1 ; n Social Study 
 
 Cbe Queen ettv of Canada a$ it i$. 
 
 " Not necessarily Toronto alone 
 but every City in America." 
 
 Toronto as a vSocial Study has been brought prominently 
 before the world by the observations of Canadian delegates 
 to the vSocial Purity Congress held at Baltimore, and by 
 the World's Convention of the Women's Christian Tem- 
 peiHuce Union held at Toronto in 1897: 
 
 MONTRE4L 
 
 THE -TORONTO PUBLISHINO CO^rPANY 
 
 1898 
 
x^x 
 
 "Tci^L.-'f^- I. 
 
 , OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 A SOCIAL STUDY. 
 
 / 
 
 The Queen City of Canada as it is. 
 
 BY 
 
 C. S. CLARK 
 
 " Not necessarily Toronto alone but every city in America.' 
 
 Toronto as a Social Study was brought prominently before the World by the 
 rennarks of Canadian delegates to the Social Purity Conference at Bal- 
 timore, and the World's Convention of the Women's Christian Temperance 
 Union, held at Toronto ir* 1897. 
 
 MONTREAI, 
 
 THE TORONTO PUBLISHI^^G COMPANY. 
 1898. 
 
I*" -"-l 
 
 n 
 
 1918!):? 
 
 -> cr 
 
 clA^?K C .^ 
 
 Wov'r 14 t»n 
 
 7^ 
 
 ^-^o^^ 
 
 ''.» 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 PAGB 
 
 Toronto i 
 
 City Government 6 
 
 Police Force 1 1 
 
 Society 27 
 
 The Press 32 
 
 The Stock Exchange 51 
 
 Financial Enterprises 54 
 
 Business in Toronto 62 
 
 The Detectives .1..... 64 
 
 Hotels (h"] 
 
 Restaurants.,.. 71 
 
 Boarding Houses : 73 
 
 Holidays in the City 76 
 
 City Parks "/"j 
 
 The Public Schools 79 
 
 Street Boys 81 
 
 The Social Evil 86 
 
 Street Walkers 131 
 
 Lodging Houses 137 
 
 The Poor of the City 142 
 
 Pawnbrokers 142 
 
 Gambling Houses 143 
 
 Drunkenness 143 
 
 Imposters 144 
 
 Pickpockets 145 
 
 Crooks 145 
 
 Thieves 146 
 
 Assignation Houses 147 
 
 Churches and the Clergy 147 
 
 The Bar 188 
 
 Music and the Drama 191 
 
 Quack Doctors \ ,.. 198 
 
 Situation Agencies 204 
 
 Swindlers , 205 
 
 Conclusion 209 
 

 TORONTO. 
 
 "Toronto the Good " and beautiful isoneof the finest cities on the 
 continent in point of beauty, wealth and intelligence, as it is unques- 
 tionably the leading commercial city of the west. It supplies to a large 
 extent the requirements of Manitoba and the North West, and 
 promises to seriously rival Montreal in the extent of its wholesale trade. 
 Situated in the centre of the Province, and commanding the leading 
 position on Lake Ontario, it is essentially a point of importance. 
 
 It has some of the handsomest streets on the continent, and is 
 really well laid out. Jarvis street with its elegant pavement is in 
 summer a most attractive thoroughfare, and the same may be said oi 
 Bloor, Sherbourne and Spadina, but the extreme east end, and the 
 west end east of Parkdale are the abode of poverty to a very great 
 extent, and are commensurately less desirable. 
 
 The city extends from the Bay northward to a line scarcely 
 definable, and this is also the case with the east and west. Real 
 estate men and companies have opened large tracts of land, and farms 
 have been converted into building lots, and as the fact of their being 
 in the city limits increases their value, it becomes therefore, most 
 desirable that they should be incorporated as soon as they are so 
 divided. 
 
 It was in the year 1883 that Toronto became land hungry and 
 began to stretch forth ambitious hands to seize adjoining sections of 
 the County of York. Bear in mind that up to this date Bloor street 
 on the north, Dufierin street on the west, and virtually the Don on 
 the east marked the boundaries of our city, whose area was 6,771 acres. 
 In 18H3, Yorkville threw in its lot with the Queen City and became 
 St. Paul's Ward. Its area was 543 acres. Its eastern boundary wafs 
 Sherbourne street, and its western a line just east of Bedford road. 
 In 1884, St. Matthew's and St. Mark's ward were born, a total increase 
 to Toronto's area of 2.346 acres. For just three years the city remained 
 content* and then came the addition of a strip 200 feet deep on the 
 north side of Kingston road (now Queen street), containing 57 acres, 
 the new annex of 209 acres, 99 acres of Rosed le quickly followed in 
 the succeeding year; 1052 acres, including Seaton village, 91 acres 
 between High Park and the west limit of Parkdale, and about 68 acres 
 which carried St. Paul's hard up to the top of the hill above the C. P. R. 
 Hemmed in by the city on three sides, Parkdale next joined fortunes 
 with Toronto and in 1889 added St. Alban's Ward, a fair-sized debt 
 and 650 acres of land to the municipality. This was the last accession 
 to our area, excepting a small strip of 35 acres on the east side of 
 Greenwood's line, which was acquired in 1890. Toronto now discovered 
 that she had grown even too strong, and that she had acquired enough 
 territory to hold all the citizens we are likely to have for the next filty 
 years. Hand in hand with this tremendous extension of territory went 
 the local improvements and the increase of our debenture debt, and 
 for the last six years citizens have been wondering what all the territory 
 
I OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 was ever wanted for, and liave been execratinfj the insane speculative 
 mania which sewered and block paved and sidewalked the grassy swards 
 of the county of York's farm lands. 
 
 Recapitulating then we see the growth in area of the city of 
 Toronto as follows ; 
 
 1834 to 1883 6,771 acres. .. 
 
 1 083 , ; 7>3i5 acres. 
 
 1884 9,661 acres. 
 
 1887 , 10,528 acres. 
 
 1888 1 1.239 acres. 
 
 1889 11,889 acres. 
 
 1890 to 1896 1 1,924 acres. ^1 
 
 That is to say, we have in a period of seven years almost doubled 
 our area. Those best qualified to speak authoritatively see in this 
 large extension of territory all the woes in the way of taxation which 
 now afflict the city. Had there L,.en added not thousands of acres of 
 what has been fitly designated goose pastures, but, say, Parkdale and 
 Yorkville and its suburbs, we should now have a compact city, light 
 taxation, land valuable, and a better and more prosperous population. 
 And it would also have been infinitely better fc" those sections which 
 came in by reason of land speculation during the seven fat years when 
 Toronto's sober population became land-crazy and speculation-mad. 
 
 Among the men who have been brought down by the collapse of 
 the real estate boom in Toronto, comparatively few can be classed as 
 lenders. A few, and, compared to the majority of borrowers, a very 
 few, have been financially prostrated by lending injudiciously. The 
 sufferers among the lending class have been mainly widows and 
 orphans, whose money was advanced through the agency of some 
 rascally lawyer upon worthless second mortgages. The sufferings of 
 these unfortunates have been grievous enough, but adversity has found 
 most of its victims, not among those who lent, but among those who 
 borrowed injudiciously. The men who have come to grief are the men 
 who sank all their own money in land, which was pledged as security 
 for further loans. While the boom lasted the lenders reaped a harvest 
 of heavy interest from the borrowers. When the boom was breaking 
 the lenders in most cases saved themselves by sacrificing the borrowers' 
 property. !t is quite evident, from the current rates of interest, that 
 borrowers who think they can get rich by paying more for money than 
 they can earn wirh it, are becoming scarcer. The enterprising borrower 
 in Toronto has paid dearly for his fondness for speculating with other 
 people's money. In some cases the other people who supplied them 
 with money have suffered. In most cases the borrower has been the 
 sufferer, and the present over-abundance of money is proof that lenders 
 have become cautious, or that borrowers have become scarce. 
 
 Toronto's popu ation is, two hundred thousand nearly, and this 
 does not include the immense throng of visitors for business or pleasure, 
 who arrive and depart daily. During times of more than ordinary 
 
OP TORONTO TUB GOOD. > 
 
 ?i interest such as some great religious or educational convention, the 
 ilndustrial Exhibition or some special attraction, these arrivals are 
 ^greatly increased The population is made up from almost every nation, 
 '{'though Canadians predominate as they should. 
 
 ;i It is the goal of almost cwtry youth's ambition in the province to 
 
 I become eventually a resident of the Queen city. Its universities, than 
 which there are on the continent none better, attract students from all 
 parts of the country and the United States as veil, while the convents, 
 business colleges, veterinary college and similar educational institutions 
 are composed almost entirely of out of town people of both sexes. To 
 succeed a young man must set to work to build up a reputation for he 
 will be taken for just what he is worth and no more. 
 
 In point of morality the people of Toronto compare with those of 
 any other city quite favourably, and if the dark side of life is to be seen 
 here, one may also witness the best. In its charities Toronto stands in 
 the front rank of Canadian and American cities. The various religious 
 denominations spend annually thousands of dollars and private contri- 
 butions towards charitable institutions amount in the aggregate to 
 sum that are almost princely. 
 
 To a certain extend the people are liberal in matters of opinion, 
 and as a rule men do not seek to influence the opinions of others except 
 in so far as they are privileged to do so, but any faddist no matter how 
 absurb or ridiculous his theories may be, will find converts in Toronto 
 who will be surprised at the lack of intelligence on the part of those 
 who do not fall in love with them. As an illustration of the suscepti- 
 bility of Torontonians the conversions made by Prince Michael of 
 Detroit, among the religiously inclined, maybe cited as a fair example 
 of what others may do or have done. 
 
 Strangers coming into the city are struck with the existence of 
 the extremes of rich and poor. 1 iving in the city is very expensive, 
 the poor are obliged to live in theskaky, tumble-down houses of Centre, 
 Elizabeth, South Jarvis and Lombard and Bathurst and some other 
 streets, while the middle classes and those of only moderate means 
 reside in the suburbs, or a considerable distance from the business 
 part of the city. They come down every morning to business in crowds 
 between the hours of seven and nine, and literally pour out of it bet- 
 ween the hours of four and seven in the evening. In fair weather the 
 inconvenience of such a life is trifling but in the winter and especially 
 after a heavy fa!' of snow it is very great, and should the street cars 
 be obstructed the annoyance is considerably increased. 
 
 A considerable number of people own their own houses, though 
 this circumstance may be a questionable advantage. House rents are 
 comparatively high, particularly in the heart of the city, and many 
 people of moderate means arc compelled to let furnished rooms or take 
 boarders to supplement their slender incomes. 
 
 That owning a house is a desirable boon is not by any means 
 certain. When the real estate boom was in its zenith property changed 
 hands at prices that were an unmitigated gratification to those who 
 
4 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 sold them, but those who bought are not so well satisfied. It is really 
 comical some of the ideas people have of the value of their land. To 
 trace this matter up I wrote to a firm of real estate agents in ref rence 
 to a house on Charles street. It was not by any means a new house, 
 but it was rented for sixteen dollars a month and taxes. Price three 
 thousand two hundred dollars. By the fairest calculation in mathe- 
 matics, it will be seen that to pay six percent, one hundred and eighty 
 dollars are required, taxes forty eight dollars at least, and then your 
 chances of profit are only contained in the remote contingency of the 
 property increasing in value. Three thousand dollars at six per cent 
 would be infinitely preferable to a house of the description I have 
 mentioned. This is not by any means an excepuional case. I could 
 give you similar ones by the score. 
 
 In spite of all these drawbacks, however, Toronto is a delightful 
 place to live in. Its boating is unsurpassed. The bay on a summer 
 night, is one mass of skiffs and sail boats, and there is scarcely a youth 
 in the city who has not experienced the delights of rowing, and a large 
 number are owners or part owners of boats. 
 
 Some years ago a number of baths were presented to the city by 
 a one tim^ resident at a cost of some $5000.00, and they were certainly 
 a boon to the boys of the city. A storm, however, destroyed their 
 utility and for a long time there was only the beach where they could 
 go, including the sand bar opposite Queen's wharf. It is currently 
 reported that some stately lady used to sit at the hotel window and 
 survey the boys in bathing through an opera or field glass, until she 
 made a complaint with the result that bathing without trunks was pro- 
 hibited by the police. Like all such prohibitive legislation, however 
 it is to be remarked that it was regularly and systematically set at 
 defiance. On Sunday mornings in summer the sand bar was alive with 
 boys and young men who strip themselves and throw their clothes in 
 a boat. If a policemen looms in sight they take to the boats and I have 
 never heard that anyone has been arrested yet. 
 
 During the past summer, Mr. W. J. Gage made an offer to the city 
 council to build a swimming bath in a central locality, if the city would 
 furnish the site. A special committee was appointed to consider the 
 matter, and confer with Mr. Gage, and recommend to council such 
 plans and methods as they m^y find practicable and desirable to secure 
 the best possible results from the liberal proposition made by Mr. Gage. 
 
 The Mayor's experiment, by which the city provided a steam tug 
 to ferry the boys of the city across the Bay to the sand bar for bathing 
 lessons proved a huge success. On one Saturday no less than 3000 
 boys were taken over, and as there was an experienced swimmer in 
 charge, and all necessary appliances on hand also at the expense of the 
 city, the bathing is absolutely safe, and the departure is proving an 
 immense boon to the boys in the hot weather. 
 
 Besides the bathing afforded by the island it is the terminus of all 
 the boats that leave the slips at night. All the water front comprises 
 interminable lengths of boat houses both private and public, and the 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 5 
 
 houses owned by organizations such as the Royal Canadian Yacht 
 Club are perfect palaces in their way. Aquatic sports comprise very 
 largely the principal diversion of Toronto's men and boys, and there is 
 scarcely a boy in the city whose sympathies are not enlisted in some 
 of the great summer events. 
 
 This seems to be a matter which is the legitimate outcome of 
 events. The bay seems to be the only place belonging to the city that 
 is not consecrated. The parks are for walking in, not for athletic 
 sports, the streets for traffic, and woe to the boy who is caught dese- 
 crating them by playing upon them. If he is under the age of sixteen 
 years, and enter a billiard room, he is liable to arrest again, so that his 
 opportunities for enjoying life are very limited indeed, and with the 
 restrictive legislation passed for his benefit, he has not much opportu- 
 nity for playing, with the result that pernicious amusements are at a 
 premium. 
 
 A child eleven years old appeared in the Police court charged 
 with the offence of playing ball on Sumach street. The ball, a small 
 rubber affair, was produced in court and the boy when asked why he 
 did not bring the bat also, explained that he had no bat, and was 
 playing with the ball and a piece of a stick when the policeman inter- 
 rupted him. There was no question as to the guilt of the accused. Hugh 
 Miller, J. P., fined the boy $2 or ten days in goal. A good hearted 
 justice of the peace like Mr. Miller could not go against the by-law, 
 but the by-law forbidding ball playing in the street should be enforced 
 against children with a good deal of discretion. By-laws that deal with 
 graver offences thdn ball playing are not enforced at all. The child 
 who was playing with a soft rubber ball on Sumach street was doing 
 nobody any harm, and the city has something else to do with its money 
 than to pay policemen to run down children who in their innocence 
 think it no sin to try and enjoy themselves. 
 
 A squad of boys, the oldest of whom was thirteen, were playing 
 ball in front of their home on Victoria street, opposite the Normal 
 School grounds, when Police Constable 195 ordered them to desist and 
 took their names. The officer did his work civilly enough, and the 
 protest is not against him, but rather against the folly of employing 
 policemen for the persecution of small boys. Not that the Toronto 
 small boy is an angel. By no means. He is rude and mischievous. His 
 mania for damaging trees and defacing property may be explained by 
 the fact that it is unsafe for him to ittempt to enjoy himself in any 
 more innocent way A hundred property owners can bear witness that 
 the police have not come between the small boy and his enjoyment of 
 the game of tearing dowii fences or breaking the windows of vacant 
 houses. But let a few children start a game on a quiet street with a 
 lawn tennis ball such as those boys on Victoria street used and imme- 
 diately a policemen interferes. When the street becomes the play- 
 ground of youths or grown men some body is liable to get hit with 
 the hard ball they use. It ought to be easy to avert this danger with- 
 out perpetuating a by-law which permits the police to exclude children 
 
« OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 from the stree'is and to terrify them with threats of Poh'ce Court prose- 
 cution for the heinous oftence of playing with a soft ball. 
 
 CITY GOVERNMENT. 
 
 The city is governed by a mayor and twenty-four aldermen who 
 receive $300 per annum who are, elected annually, though the mayor, 
 as an act of grace, is usually permitted to have a second and sometimes 
 a third term. His salary is three thousand dollars per annum. 
 
 In the Municipal Amendment Act of 1896 a radical change has 
 been made by the creation of a Board of Control, which applies practi- 
 cally only to the city of Toronto. 1 he Board consists of the Mayor and 
 three aldermen, the latter to be elected by the Council. The tenure of 
 office is yearly. Salaries to the limit of $700 each may be fixed by by- 
 law. The duties are to prepare the estimates, deal with and award con- 
 tracts, inspect all municipal works, nominate to the Council all heads 
 of the various civic departments and recommend the salaries, and no 
 official or clerk shall be appointed without the consent of the Board, 
 except on a two-thirds majority of the Council. Power to dismiss 
 employes, and to regulate the work of the various departments, are 
 some of the other duties of the Board. 
 
 It shall also be the duty of the Board, subject to the approval of 
 Council, to regulate and supervise all matters connected with expendi- 
 ture, revenue and investments, and recommend such measures to the 
 Council as may be deemed necessary therewith ; 
 
 To have supervision and control of all books, documents, vouchers 
 and securities belonging to the corporation ; 
 
 To see that persons in office and to be appointed to office shall 
 give and mai tain the necessary security for the performance of their 
 respective duties ; 
 
 To carry out the orders of the Council, and for that purpose to 
 direct and control all heads of departments in the execution of the 
 duties of their offices ; 
 
 The Board shall, as soon as may be, provide the necessary funds 
 for any expenditure recommended by two-thirds of the members of 
 the Council present and voting, and the yeas and nays on sach voting 
 shall be recorded an 1 forwarded to the chairman of the Board ; 
 
 The Board shah hold regular meetings, in time to allow the pre- 
 lentation to the Council 1/ the Board of all reports of the Select and 
 Standing Committees, transmitted to the Board three days previous to 
 the meeting of the Council ; 
 
 The Board shall appoint one of their number as vice-chairman, 
 who shall act as chairman in the absence of the Mayot, having first 
 been notified by the Mayor in writing of his intention to be tempora- 
 rily absent from his duties ; 
 
 Reports of all Standing and Special Committees shall be presented 
 to the Board of Control for transmission to the Council. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 7 
 
 Reports of the Board of Control intended for the consideration of 
 Council shall be'transmitted to the members of Council one day previous 
 to the meeting of the Council. 
 
 A new clause in the section defining the duties of the Committee 
 on Legislation provides that all agreements for franchises, etc., shall be 
 considered and reported upon by that commit*^ee. 
 
 At the municipal elections held on the jrd January, 1898, John 
 Shaw was elected Mayor over Mr. E. A. Macdonald by 4000 majority. 
 This is Mr. Shaw's second term really, he having been elected Mayor 
 in August, 1897, by the City Council, when P.Iayor Fleming was made 
 Assessment Commissioner. With regard to Mr. Fleming, I am much 
 pleased that he has received this appointment, though 1 know him only 
 by reputation. I have watched the course of civic politics in Toronto 
 from a distance, and I never heard of a more dirgracefui campaign than 
 that waged against him when Mr. Warring Kennedy defeated him by 
 something under fifty votes, excepting, perhaps, the one just closed, In 
 som- minor points. The speech made by Mr. Macdonald at the nomin- 
 ations, according to the Globe's report was an intellectual treat. Mr 
 Shaw and Mr. F. S. Spence were treated to such a scathing denunci- 
 ation that the Globe headed its report " Running in the Mud." When 
 Mr. Fleming and Mr. Kennedy were the candidates, it was not sufficient 
 that their public records should furnish the basis of argument, but the 
 press supporting Mr. Kennedy did not tire of referring io him as the 
 " successful business man ", while the reverse was said of Mr. Fleming. 
 But amongst the most disgraceful things said in a most disgrace ful 
 campaign was the comparison drawn between the two men as to their 
 relative positions in the Methodist Church. Would it not have been the 
 act of a gentleman, let alone a Christian for Mr. Kennedy to have pro- 
 tested against such tactics ? Yet when one Methodist Minister from 
 his pulpit expressed his intention of supporting Mr. Fleming he was 
 promptly called to order by these same papers, and treatened with dire- 
 consequences if he persisted. Does the Omnipotent sleep ? Was it not 
 Almighty God who said "Vengeance is mine, and I will repay ?" Mr. 
 Kennedy did not serve his term, however, for the house of Samson, 
 Kennedy & Co., " the successful business men " made an assignment. 
 Was not that the hand of an avenging Providence? Had Mr. Kennedy 
 possessed any of the qualifications that entitled him to the position 
 of Mayor, one might have condoned the mud throwing by the press 
 that was indulged in, but his messages to council were compared by 
 one journal to a comic song or a burlesque, and not unreasonably so. 
 When he sent a message of condolence to the widow of Sir John 
 Thompson, he informed her that Sir John possessed an exuberance of 
 intellect that was highly polished, as though he were speaking of a 
 shirt front. When the Globe saw fit to adversely criticise some of his 
 acts, they were sent a letter informing them that as they saw fit to cri- 
 ticise His Worship they would get no more advertising. So there ! 
 That must be about on a par with what a school boy of ten would do. 
 But perhaps, about the most ridiculous thing was when Mr. Kennedy 
 
i OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 cabled his regrets as Mayor of Toronto at the death of the Russian 
 Emperor— an act that provoked from the Evening Telegram a most 
 excellent caricature. In my next edition, I may give miniatures of 
 these caricatures, if I can get the consent of that paper. 
 
 Some years ago, chiefly owi.-g to the influence of the News, 
 which vyas at that time specially influential in both temperance and 
 labour circles, Mr. W. H. Rowland, the nominee of this con»bination, 
 was elected, and during his regime, and with the influence of the News, 
 the ring that seemed to have been formed to swindle thi water- works 
 department was exposed and tht guilty parties brought to justice. 
 
 This exposure was the lever that commenced the idea cf a strictly 
 moral city, which should be consummated by restrictive legislation. A 
 more fatal mistake was never made. Mankind in general have a passive 
 regard for public opinion, and unwritten laws regarding morality, and 
 can usually be trusted to give a moral support to usages that have a 
 tendency to elevate their fellows, but once make this unwritten law 
 take the form of restrictive legislation and this same mankind will most 
 emphatically rebel. In support of this assertion, let me say that I have 
 in easy recollection the names of quite a dozen women of unquestion- 
 able reputation, members of different churches, who will visit American 
 cities and smuggle into Canada hundreds ofdoUars worth of merchandise 
 and declare to the preventive officer that they have nothing dutiable 
 when if he were to make a search he would find that they were telling 
 him the most barefaced falsehoods. Make any law which is regarded 
 as restrictive and which does not receive the moral support of the people, 
 and men who would never dream of breaking it before it became law, 
 will take a delight in doing so simply to show their contempt, and 
 because they consider it interferes with their rights. This was what 
 happened in Toronto, and finally culminated in a most complete and 
 over-whelming defeat to the party supporting it. Mr. Howland knew 
 that he dare not face the electorate and ask for re-election a third time, 
 but Mr. Elias Rogers was prevailed upon to do so by those who stood 
 beside Mr. Howland, and a veritable Waterloo was the result to them, 
 in spite of the fact that the prayers of the righteous were imp'ored on 
 behalf of their candidate. Had Mr. Rogers been opposed by the most 
 unmitigated blackguard in Toronto, there can be no doubt that he 
 would have been defeated, or elected by such a narrow majority that 
 it would have been tantamount to defeat. The people were simply 
 waiting an opportunity to rend them. 
 
 It is simply the repetition of history. 
 
 We are informed that the Puritans, when in the ascendant, had 
 with an iron hand crushed down many amusements, the desire of which 
 is a natural appetite of man, and thus created a hunger and a longing 
 for the forbidden things, which became an unappeasable frenzy when 
 the Restoration brought a chancre. The nation plunged madly into 
 the opposite extreme. An utter absence of shame marked the mode 
 of life in that most wicked age. The blush of innocence seemed almost 
 forgotten in the court circles in England. Almost all the duties to God 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 9 
 
 and man in the theatres were held up to publ'': mockery. Virtue in 
 every form especially truth and modesty cam -♦ in for the comedian's 
 jeering, and the loudest applause was brought forth from the audience 
 by the triumph of the profligate and the ridicule cast upon the victims 
 of his success. 
 
 On a lesser scale was the Puritanical rule exercised in Toronto. 
 We did not have any such crazy names as " Praise God Barebones," or 
 others equally ridiculous, but we had suppressing laws being introduced, 
 and attempts made to carry them out. The populace were absolutely 
 incensed, and the Government was ruthlessly overthrown, and justly so. 
 
 Mr. Edward F. Clarke was nominated by those who were opposed 
 to this state of affairs, and it may be mentioned that he had the support 
 of the News, which was, I believe, the only paper in the city supporting 
 him, while Mr. Elias Rogers was the nominee af those who wished to 
 see a continuance of Mayor Howland's policy. Arrayed on the side of 
 Mr. Clarke were the leading business men of the city, and Professor 
 Goldwin Smith moved his nomination. 
 
 The battle raged long and fiercely and was not without its humou- 
 rous side as well. Aarrayed on either side were the forces of practical 
 common sense, and on the other a sentiment to make people religious 
 and moral by " Act of Council ". Another element in the contest was 
 a by-law reducing the number of licences, and the arguments used 
 against Mr. Clarke were that if he were elected there would be no pos- 
 sibility of carrying this law into effect. It promised to be a rich harvest 
 Tor the newspapers in the way of advertising. The W.C.T.U. announced 
 in black heavy heading letters " For God. Home and Country ", that 
 Mrs. Youmans would address the eleclors in such a place at such a 
 time, and some Alliance made an equal if not more brilliant show. The 
 other side carried on the warfare without this amount of advertising, 
 but having the sympathies of the people their work had a lasting and 
 radical effect. Mr. Clarke was elected, I believe, by nine hundred 
 majority, 
 
 The first sign of open rebellion against the people who intended 
 by act of council to keep an eye on the morals of the city came when 
 Mr. Howland attempted to give effect to a by-law making it a misde- 
 meanor to hire a horse on Sunday. The matter was brought into the 
 courts, and when Mr. Clarke was elected it was allowed to drop. The 
 city had become heartily sick of paying for legal services to give effect 
 to the whims of Mr. Howland and his clique, and since that time we 
 have had no such attempt to introduce radical measures for the purifi- 
 cation of the common ruck. But those who were with Mr. Howland 
 have attempted in various ways to bring in other restrictive legislation, 
 and with most disastrous results. After two defeats a by-law permitting 
 the running of street cars on Sunday has passed by a good substantial 
 majority, and to-day we have Sunday street cars, where ten years ago, 
 a man was prosecut2d for letting out a horse on Sunday. Again it 
 would appear, have the Righteous come to grief. The prayers of 
 different people were asked that God might decree that the by-law 
 
10 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 should not carry. Apparently God did not take much heed of their 
 prayers for the by-law carried. Coercing morality into people is pretty 
 much like fighting a wolf. If you keep up the hght gradually and fire 
 a shot into him occasionally, you will in the end succeed in killing 
 him. But once you start to make too short work of him and drive him 
 into a corner, then look out for squalls. He will turn and with the 
 energy of madness destroy the man who might have killed him, had 
 he been less in a hurry. Now there is to be another horror in store for 
 Toronto. It is stated that the steamship companies are to run their 
 boats on Sunday from Toronto to some American port. It may be 
 not out of place for me to observe that on the first Sunday that cars 
 ran in Toronto, the city survived the shock, and was not visited by any 
 land slide, earthquake, or tornado, but seems to be in the same old 
 place doing business as usual. 
 
 I am indebted to the kindness of Mr. R. T. Coady, City Treasurer, 
 for the following figures : 
 
 MEMO OF ESTIMATF:S of salaries, 1897. 
 
 CITY OF TORONTO. 
 
 Aldermen $ 7,800 
 
 ' Assessment Department I4>340 
 
 Audit 2,950 
 
 Board of Control , 2,800 
 
 City Clerk's Department 10,376 
 
 City Surveyor & Assistant 3.225 
 
 Court of Revision.; 1,500 
 
 Engineer's Department 20,000 
 
 Fire Department 109,665 
 
 Isolation Hospital 5,0'»o 
 
 Jail 13.450 
 
 Law Department 13,300 'v 
 
 . License Keceiving Office 760 
 
 Local Board of Health 15,820 
 
 Mayor 3,600 
 
 Mayor's Office 2,000 
 
 Messenger City 624 
 
 Parks and Gardens 2,025 
 
 Police Court Officers 8,572 
 
 Police Department 207,229 
 
 Property and Markets 11,585 
 
 Public Library .. 12,465 
 
 Schools, Collegiate Institutes $ 48,050 
 
 Public Schools 353,114 
 
 Separate Schools 24,533 
 
 Technical " 6,856 
 
 43*553 
 
 Tax Collectors ^,800 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 11 
 
 Treasurer's Department 19,200 
 
 Water Works — Rating and Revenue Branch, (under 
 
 City Treasurer) '^2,647 
 
 Water Works Department, (under City Engineer)... 41,500 
 
 Total , $993,786 
 
 For the year 1896 the receipts of the city from all sources, includ- 
 ing the balance on hand at the beginning of the year, amounted to 
 $7,336,710,92 and the disbursements to $5,559,633.24 leaving a balance 
 on hand and in banks of $1,777,077.68, including $1,245,652.60 of 
 Sinking Fund moneys. The statement of current assets and liabilities 
 shows liabilities for the year $1,650,122.57 and assets $1,586,047.15 
 leaving a debit balance of $64,075.42. 
 
 TORONTO'S DEBENTURE DEBT. 
 
 The debenture debt of the city on 31st December, 1896, was as 
 followa : — 
 
 General debenture debt $13,053,653.05 
 
 Local improvement debenture debt 7,653,763.18 
 
 Toronto Railway 1,067,328.57 
 
 Total gross $21,775,145.80 
 
 • Deduct cash and debentures at credit of various sinking funds as 
 follows: — 
 
 Cash $1,245,652.60 
 
 City debentures, purchased with sinking fund 
 
 ■ money 3,672,33044 
 
 Invested in Dominion of Canada stock 486.67 
 
 Total $4,918,469.71 
 
 Leaving a total net debenture debt of $16,856,676.09. 
 The value of property owned by the city is estimated at $ 1 2,ooo,ooo» 
 exclusive of all public works and services of the city. 
 
 POLICE FORCE. 
 
 I am indebted to the courtesy of Lt. Col. Grassett, late the Prince 
 of Wales Leinster Regiment, Chief Constable for his Annual Report 
 for 1896, from which I take the following statistics relating to the force: 
 
 1 here were 8,329 persons apprehended or summoned during the 
 year, being 671 more than in 1895. Breaches of City By-laws represent 
 539 of the increase. Lost property shows a decrease of $4,570 and 
 stolen property an increase of $9,017. The percentage of lost and 
 stolen property recovered was $8,407 and $407 respectively — the differ- 
 ence in the latter being accounted for through identification being 
 rendered impossible by melting plate, jewellery, etc., and by disposing 
 of goods outside the city. 
 
13 OP TORONTO T SB GOOD. ' 
 
 DETECTIVE DEPARTMENT. v 
 
 The records of clie criminal cases dealt Jwich by this Department, 
 taken as a whole, show an increase of 151 over those of 1895, but as 
 petty larceny represents an excess of 140, the more serious cfTencef; 
 total about the same. 
 
 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT. 
 
 Nature of Offence. 181 . 1806. Increase. Decrease. 
 
 Murder 7 4 3 
 
 Burglary 32 26 6 
 
 House-breaking 188 189 i 
 
 Highway robbery 13 13 
 
 Pocket picking 80 lOO 20 
 
 ■ j Horsestealing 4 3 I 
 
 Larceny 1,423 1,563 140 
 
 Total.« 1.747 1,898 161 10 
 
 Miscellaneous cases attended 
 
 to 2,690 2,636 54 
 
 Occurrences reported 4i430 4i530 lOO 
 
 Committals for felonies 798 799 i 
 
 Value of property recovered,! 1 8,2 52 $15,436 $2,812 
 
 Arrests made 667 734 67 
 
 • « > • • 
 
 « 
 
 MURDER. 
 
 The four cases under this heading comprise, two of infanticide by 
 persons unknown, one of a man who killed another and was acquitted 
 by a jury on the grounds of self-defence, and the fourth a jockey who 
 died from the effects of a murderous assault committed for the purpose 
 of robbery. All hope has not yet been abandoned of placing the sus- 
 pected parties on their trial for this crime. 
 
 In addition to the foregoing there occured three instances of man- 
 slaughter. One caused by a fall on the street due to a collision with 
 two unknown men ; another a fratricide of which the accused was 
 acquitted, and for the third a man awaits trial. 
 
 - BURGLARY. . '^. 
 
 There were six fewer cases of burglarious entry reported than in 
 1895, and the amount stolen, apart from the large sum obtained by the 
 thieves at the Toronto University, was rather under that of the previous 
 year. In one instance the burglar resorted to fireams to effect his escape. 
 
 HOUSEBREAKING. 
 
 The number of reports classified under this heading are about the 
 same as in the preceding twelve months, but the loss sustained was 
 larger by $900.00. Nearly all the men who committed most of these 
 depredations were eventually arrested and are now in prison. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 It 
 
 HIGHWAY ROBBERY. 
 
 While the number of cases was the same this year as last, the 
 amount stolen was larger, nearly all of which came from the pockets 
 of drunken persons. 
 
 POCKET PICKING. 
 
 This class of offence being easy to commit and difticult to detect 
 has been on the increase, and the pe^-uniary success attending those 
 engaging in this sort of thieving is represented by $1,571 in cash, as 
 compared with $935 in 1895. 
 
 Out of 100 instances reported, 25 occurred in the streets, the 
 remaining 75 in places of public resort, such as shops, churches^ 
 markets, etc. 
 
 LARCENY. 
 
 A considerable increase is to be noticed under this head both in 
 the number of cases and the amount stolen, the figures respectively 
 being 120 and $5,238. They cover thefts of infinite variety, the new 
 code classification being more comprehensive than the old. 
 
 CHANGES IN THE DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
 « 
 .2 3 
 
 
 
 11 
 1" 
 
 4 
 
 It 
 
 ll 
 
 ►so 
 
 
 2 
 
 1 
 
 >5 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 '1 
 
 i 
 
 'S 
 
 
 
 ^1 
 
 i 
 1 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 Remaining last year- 
 Appointed during year. 
 Retired on pension .... 
 Dismissed 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 6 
 
 12 
 
 6 
 
 6 
 
 4 
 
 219 
 
 266 
 
 
 • • • • »••■ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 3 
 
 207 
 
 
 Resigned 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 16 
 
 
 
 
 Remaining 
 
 I I 
 
 I 
 
 6 
 
 15 
 
 6 
 
 4 
 
 258 
 
 Appended is the usual statement of receipts and expenditure taken 
 from the books kept in the Orderly Room. 
 
 Est 
 
 Salaries $206,948 
 
 Clothing and equipment 
 
 Miscellanous sundries 
 
 Ambulance service 
 
 Mounted service 
 
 Patrol wagon and signal service.. 
 Van service 
 
 Estimate. 
 
 Expenditure. 
 
 $206,948 05 
 
 $204,741 54 
 
 8,0? I 71 
 
 7.578 14 
 
 6,833 00 
 
 4.736 40 
 
 1,115 50 
 
 991 56 
 
 1,485 00 
 
 1,260 13 
 
 4.314 50 
 
 4,029 08 
 
 442 00 
 
 449 18 
 
 $229,189 y6 
 
 $223,786 03 
 
 $223,786 03 
 
 
 Balance $ 5,403 73 
 
14 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 STAFF INSPECTOR'S DEPARTMENT. 
 
 The reports received and attended to by this Department are 
 recorded as 2,439, being 26 less than in 1895. The cases brought into 
 
 the Court were as under : — 
 
 Tines Imposed. 
 
 1805 1800 1896 1806 
 
 Houses of ill-fame 46 45 
 
 Disorderly houses 36 j6 $ 140 $ 315 
 
 Liquor cases 74 87 1.345 1.763 
 
 Cruelty to animals 139 n8 326 276 
 
 Miscellaneous 369 444 801 282 
 
 Total 687 750 $2,612 $2,636 
 
 HOUSES OF ILL- FAME.. 
 
 While houses of ill-fame with regular inmates are not more in 
 evidence than they were a year ago, loose women have scattered them- 
 selves about, living in rooms where they can receive men without police 
 interference, often to the annoyance of the more respectable neighbors, 
 who object to their presence, and desire their removal. The police, 
 however, find it no easy matter to deal effectively with this class of 
 persons. Enticing men from windows and doorways, being safer than 
 solicitation on the streets, has been resorted to in some localities. 
 
 GAMBLING. 
 
 If gambling is carried on with the usual outfit and equipment 
 necessary for the purpose and in rooms accessible to anyone who wants 
 to join in a game, the police claim to be unaware of the fact. Two 
 raffles, two lotteries, some Chinese playing fan-tan on Sunday, and boys 
 shooting craps in the streets, include all the cases before the Court 
 under this heading. 
 
 LIQUOR CASES. 
 
 The returns show a slight decrease in the number of prosecutions 
 for a violation of the Liomce Law. The result has been, no doubt, 
 contributed to by the granting of a license at the Island. The illicit 
 sale of liquor there has almost ceased. There has been no relaxation 
 in the efforts of the Department to enforce observance of the law. 
 
 CHARGES AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE FORCE. 
 
 2 Constables were Absent from duty without leave Dismissed. 
 
 " Fined. ' 
 
 " " " Admonished. 
 
 Assaulting a comrade Fined. 
 
 " citizen " 
 
 Allowing a prisoner to escape " 
 
 Being found coming out of a brewery . . - - -. ^ 
 
 while on duty .... •' 
 
 Being found coming out of a licensed 
 
 hotel while on duty Reduced. - - , „ ., - 
 
 Being found coming out of a licensed <^ 
 
 hotel while on duty Fined. 
 
 Borrowing money from a hotel-keeper. . . " 
 
 2 
 
 It 
 
 It 
 
 1 
 I 
 
 • »: ■ 
 
 It 
 i< 
 « 
 
 1 
 
 ^ * , 
 
 t< 
 
 I 
 
 •. '* ,," ■ 
 
 (• 
 
 r' 
 
 :-"-C'_ ;: 
 
 « 
 
 1 
 
 .( 
 
 (. 
 
 1 
 
 « 
 
 <( 
 
OF TORONTO THE CrOOD. 16 
 
 1 Sergeant for Intoxlcaxion Severely reprimanded. 
 
 1 ConHtable " " Admonished. 
 
 . 6 " " •' Fined. 
 
 1 " " Makine false giatcmenta to a superior 
 
 olBccr Dismissed. 
 
 9 " " Neglect of duty Fined. 
 
 2 " " " Admoc'shed. 
 
 1 " " " Allowed to resign. 
 
 1 " " Neglectingto report important information 
 
 communisated to liim by a citizen.. .Reduced. 
 1 " " Soliciting money for services at a criclcet 
 
 match Fined. 
 
 22 " " Violation of tlie Rules and Regulations 
 
 of the I'olice Department " 
 
 14 " " Violation of the Rules and Regulations 
 
 of the Police Department ... Admonished, 
 
 i " '• Violation of the Rules and Regulations 
 
 of the Police Department Allowed to resign. 
 
 The city is governed in police matters by three commissioners, the 
 Police Magistrate, the Mayor, and the County judge, but any complaint 
 against the force is made to the chief constable, and investigated by 
 the commissioners, who also deal with the officers offending, or who 
 are to receive any special mark of approbation. 
 
 Besides having a sure thing in the way of their pay, the police 
 seem to have the privilege of doing other work besides, as will be seen 
 by the following correspondence : 
 
 Sir, — Can you give the public any information how it is that the police of this city are 
 allowed to take contracts when they are off duty ? I think they get enough without taking the 
 bread out of the mouths of the poor mechanics. L have seen two of them shingling houses in 
 St. John's ward more than once, i think the sooner it is stopped the better. If tney are not 
 satisfied with their pay why not leave like men ? — Fair Play and Justice. 
 
 The correspondent in his communication directs attention to a 
 matter that should receive the prompt attention of the Chief constable 
 and the Board of Police Commissioners. It .should be fully investigated. 
 The constables referred to in the latter are said to be two brothers 
 named Tripp, one of whom has only recently joined the force, who, if 
 they are doing the work, are guilty of violating one of the regulations 
 of the police department. The regulations in question prohibit mem- 
 bers of the force from engaging in any business, either themselves or 
 their wives. The regulations strictly define that a constable is required 
 to devote his whole time to his business as a policeman. If he engages 
 in any other employment he should be held accountable to the Board 
 of Police Commissioners for insubordination and breach of discipline. 
 It is no secret that not a few constables do not scruple to carry on 
 speculations and operations in real estate while they are supposed to 
 be doing their duty. The matter affords the Board a wide scope for 
 an investigation, whereby they might easily ascertain just how many, 
 if any, members of the force are growing wealthy by side d&alings in 
 real estate, and how many of them practically carry on profitable real 
 estate agencies. 
 
 While there is a bare possibility that some salutary reforms may 
 be made, it is safe to say that the probabilities are very remote. In the 
 following observations given by different people, it will be seen that 
 
16 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 one man makesthe charges that Staff Inspector Archibald has appealed 
 to rehgious bodies and has been able thereby to perpetuate the system. 
 In his address to the electors in his first campaign, Mr. Fleming is 
 reported as saying : 
 
 I want to say ;i word about our heavy police expenses. Now do not misunderstand me. 
 1 am not criticising our policemen. I believe, and I do not say this (or any other purpose but 
 of foirly giving credit where credit is due, I believe there is not another force on this continent 
 that will compare with ours. 
 
 A voice — At drinking lager. 
 
 Mr. Fleming — No, [ du not think there is a force of men in America who drink as little 
 lager as our police. Neither is there a lot of policemen who as seldom enter a saloon. (Laugh* 
 ter). No, they are a sober lot of men. 
 
 A voice — What about Archibald and his Morality Department. 
 
 Mr. F'leming — When I become Mayor I will investigate that. Now I do not think we 
 ought to have so many drunk.s at the police court. Arresting a man when he is simply drunk, 
 when he is walking auietly home never does any good. It swells the number of cases. It gives 
 our police court neealess work. It often causes the unfortunate offender to lose more time than 
 he would have lost if he had been allowed to go home and get to work the next morning. Then 
 his sufftring family suffer still more. It gives our city a worse name than it reall v deserves, and 
 it never does the arre.sted man a particle of good. You never knew one dollar and costs to 
 cure one single ca.ne of drunkenness. The shame of the police court often does incalculable 
 harm to the man who has been overtaken by his evil appetite, that after all. our present social 
 customs and laws really foster. As a rule the first offender, after spending his night in the cells, 
 among thieves and hardened characters, alter the anxiety caused by his absence from home, 
 after the loss of his half day, and the humiliation of the police court, simply has his case 
 dismissed. I think that if it is necessary sometimes to arrest a man who is helpless, for his own 
 protection, the inspector of the station could very well be empowered to record his arrest and 
 set him at liberty when he gets sober. Mind, I am not advocating leniency with hardened 
 drunkards, I am simply pointing out the fact that we are wasting time and meney, an*! badger- 
 ing citisens, with no benefit to anyone and with positive injury in many cases. (Loud applause). 
 Then we have .k> many police court case of violation of city by-laws. I think laws ought to 
 be enforced and respected, but it is pretty hard to see the city with such disgracefully dirty 
 streets ai some of our leading thoroughfares are to-day, prosecuting citizens who have not had 
 sunlight enough to melt a little snowfall off his sidewalk before ten o'clock in the morning, or 
 whose cow has committed the unpardonable offence of grazing for a few minutes on a vacant 
 lot, at the storekeeper whose barrel of apple* has stuck out an inch and a half too far on the 
 sidewalks. Laws should be made to protect us, not to worry us. Policemen should be for our 
 
 firotection, not our annoyance. I want to see a little less expenditure of public money, and a 
 ittle more use of common sense. (Loud applause). 
 
 At a public meeting the Rev. Father Geoghegan, of Hamilton, 
 
 seconded a resolution in speech pregnant with valuable ideas on the 
 
 subject of juvenile treatment, and in the course of his remarks said : 
 
 Our policemen don't put themselves out to treat our boys with ordinary decency. I have 
 seen policemeri on Saturday night who could not notice men coming out of the side door of a 
 saloon, run at a lad who was catching a ball on the street, and threaten him with arrest But 
 the bnys had no votes which could control the aldermen who put the coat on the policeman's 
 back, while the bar>room loafers had. At this there was great applause. 
 
 In support of the contention of the Rev. gentleman, a case occurs 
 
 which is somewhat analogous, and demonstrates the difficulties civilians 
 
 have in maintaining their rights. The newspaper report says : 
 
 Inspector Stephen, of No. i Police Division is engaged in investigating a charge against 
 P. C. Duncan (145) of having committed an assault on a young man named Wm. Robinson, of 
 72 Gerrard street, vest. Robinson states that he was standing near Hubbard's livery stable on 
 Nelson street, in company with a friend when Duncan addressed him in an ungentlemanly 
 mannei, and afterwards struck him three or four blows in the face leaving bruises there. He 
 states that he and hin friend were returning from a party at Brock avenue, and in this way 
 accounts for his presence on the street at that early hour of the morning. Duncan gives his 
 version ui the affair as follows : Robinson and his companion had knocked at the door of a 
 disreputable house at No. 16 Nelson street He was on special duty watching the place He 
 admits speaking to them, but denies having used any insulting language. Robinson clutched 
 him by the arm, and all the force he used was only necessary to loosen his hold. The Inspec- 
 tor will make his report to the Chief Constable, who will likely refer it to the Board of 
 Police Commissioners. 
 
OK TORONTO TUK GOOD. II 
 
 On the following day the same paper said in connection with 
 this case : 
 
 Among the meniberH of the police force there is considerable speculation lieing indulged 
 in regard to the complaint that a young man prelerred against P C. Duncan. Me alleges that 
 Dnncan assaulted him. and made a statement of the occurrence just as it transpired, to Inspector 
 Stephen the day followng 'I'hat report has not yet been f irwardcd to the Chief Coiistable by 
 Mr. Stephen, and some of the constables are wc ndering if the fnspector has taken upon himself 
 the authority of relegating it to the waste paper basket because the accused constable is one of 
 his " pets" and likewise « countryman. The young man felt that he was harshly treated by 
 the constable, and he does not intend to allow the matter to drop without being inquired into. 
 In strange contrast another case is pointed out F C. Duncan made a trifling complaint against 
 1'. C. Childs ( II), and Inspector Stephen forwarded his report on that case to I.ieut.-Col. 
 Grassett before the ink was dry on it. It appears that the young man who claims to have l)een 
 assaulted by Duncan met Childs a tew minutes later. He appealed to Childs for information, 
 and the latter very properly advised him to report Duncan to his superior ftfficers. Duncan 
 and Childs had an exchange of compliments, in the course of which he called Duncan a "pet", 
 or something like that. For this hejis to be carpeted. Meanwhile, Duncan is not even reported. 
 
 Now let the reader for one moment contrast the treatment a civi- 
 lian receives with the treatment a policeman receives if the former 
 happens to be the culprit. The following is the newspaper report of an 
 incident that will illustrate my meaning. 
 
 P. C. William Allan (184) was the victim of an unsually brutal assault at the hands of a 
 gang of rowdies. He was patrolling his beat on River street, when two brothers named John 
 and George O'Connell came together down River street. They were both apparently under 
 the influence of liquor, John being very noisy, and using profane language. Allan arrested 
 John when the brother mterfered. Both men peeled off their coats, and proceeded to pound 
 him with their fists and feet. George wrested the baton from the officer's B;rasp, and b«at him 
 with it, it is alleged until his face was (rightfully battered beyond recognition and frightfully 
 disfigured. Allan struggled desperately with his assailants but they were assisted hy a third 
 man who came along. Allan was found in an almost unconscious condition by some neighb mrs 
 who came to render him assistance. The rowdies levanted as the newcomers approac^^ed, but 
 later on George O'Connell was arrested. Allan was reported to be in a serious condition, so 
 the prisoner was remanded for a weckonthechargeof assaulting the constable, bail being fixed 
 In two sureties in I500 00 each 
 
 The above is the aspect of the case as first reported, and presented 
 before the police court. The young men had the courage of their con- 
 victions, and carried it to the county court, and though I tried to get 
 a copy of the actual judgment, I failed to do so, but I give you the 
 following remarks from the Telegram on the subject : 
 
 The jury that judged between policeman Allan and his assaillants are a credit to the 
 city of Toronto and the county of York. It actjuitted the innocent, convicted the guilty, and 
 censured an officer who was summarily punished by the broken head that was the dividend he 
 received for a large share in the authorship of the original scuffle. Their Honours the Com- 
 missioners assume that an officer, if infallible. They seldom chide the officious constable. This 
 tolerance encour?ges tyranny and brutality, and flnally uniformed bullies come to grit^f in the 
 Assize court, where the common sense of a judge and jury affords the protection to the humlest 
 of her Majesty's lieges ! 
 
 The above will bear comparison with the following case', which still 
 further shows the difficulties the public are compelled to contend against, 
 in as much as the city seems to be compelled to defend a policeman, 
 guilty or not guilty, and the other fellow must pay his own lawyer. It 
 would seem only reasonable that both should be on terms of equality, 
 if that were possible, in a case of this kind. 
 
 Wm. and Robert O'Reilly are brothers living on Power street. They were arrested by 
 policeman John Welsh on Berkeley street, on a charge of being disorderly. They were put 
 mto the patrol waggon, handcuffed, put mto the cells at No. 4, in a cold fireless room. The 
 next morning the Magistrate discharged them after hearing the officer's statement, and they 
 
18 OF TOROITTO THE GOOD. 
 
 sued the policeman for |iooo damages for false arrest, cruel treatment and false imprisonment. 
 Dr. Nattrass swore that he found Robert's back and ribs injured, which injuries, the boy swore 
 were inflicted by Welsh jumpine upon him with his knees. Charles Quinn, Patrick Milligan, 
 John O'Donnell and Maggie "(J'Keilly told the story of the arrest in corroboration of the 
 brothers' evidence. Officer Welsh said that Quinn and two other young men were acting as 
 if drunk and used obscene language to him ; Quinn struck at the officer who ran to arrest him, 
 but he escaped ; then he met Wm. O'Reilly, who was drunk and refused to give the officer his 
 name ; he was arrested for the refusal. IVIeanwhile Robert came up and interfered, when he, 
 too, was arrested . In the westle both fell, and he did not jump upon the boy intentionally. 
 One of the police regulations demands that any person who refuses to give his name may be 
 arrested. Mr. Holmes who prosecuted the case said ; 
 
 " Things have come to a pretty pass in this city if its citizens are to be treated in this 
 way." 
 
 Judge Falconbridge very particularly enquired of **r Biggar who defended Welsh, by 
 what authority these regulations were passed. The Solicitor thought by the municipal Act, but 
 was not sure. Upon this point the doughty barrister got in a noted objection. In order to 
 test the credibility of a witness M r. Biggar asked him if he was not once in the dock on a serious 
 charge, and what the charge was. 1 he judge told the witness he need not answer unless he 
 chose to do so ; ther^; was n^ truth in the charge. Constable O'Brien, one of the men who 
 came with the waggon, said he handcuffed the boys by Welsh's order. Mr. Biggar argued against 
 submission to the jury, but it went there. 
 
 A letter from Mr. Holmes to me said the verdict was for the 
 plaintiff, county court costs set-off. 
 
 Again the following case is demonstrative that a purely vindictive 
 spirit actuates the force in dealing with culprits : 
 
 P. C. Weston had a boy named John Connors before the court for drunkenness and 
 having hit him on the head with a bottle. Mr. Baxter not having jurisdiction to try the assault 
 case, a suggestion from the Deputy Chief that his Worship should deal out sufficient punish- 
 ment to Connors on the drunkenness charge was acted upon. After hearing the evidence and 
 learning that Conners had received a scalp wound from contact with the peeler's baton, Mr. 
 Baxter imposed a fine of $3 and costs or 30 days. The Deputy L-hief then said that he thought 
 he would have to prefer the charge of assaulting Weston against Conners. 
 
 Mr. Baxter — But you led me to understand that both offences were to be dealt with 
 at once. 
 
 The Deputy — So I did, but that small fine don't suit me 
 
 Mr. Baxter — I won't allow you sir, to criticise my rulings. 
 
 The Deputy — I want to lay the second charge. 
 
 Mr. Baxter — You can do that, of course, but it all'goes to show that each case should 
 stand on its own bottom, .^syou intend to swear to that other information, I will make the 
 fine $i,OT 30 days. Conners was remanded for a week on the assault case. 
 
 Of this Deputy Chief the Toronto News says : 
 
 The burglar who escaped from the cells at Police Headquarters pried his way out with 
 a crowbar, but the entire staff armed with ciowbars could not pry the deputy chief from the well 
 paid job he fills so muchly that he overflows into judicial duties. 
 
 The fol' owing is another case of police espionage, and shows that 
 where the defendant has the courage and the money to go on with his 
 case, he will generally come out on top, and will be a cause for rejoi- 
 cing to those who like to see every one get British fair play, and in 
 striking contrast to the above case, where the Deputy Chief seemed to 
 think that where the defendant was a common civilian and the punish- 
 ment meted out was not a sufficient vindication of the majesty of the 
 force he must institute another charge against the defendant. The 
 following is taken from the Telegram : 
 
 James H. Bailey, the young man whose mother alleges that the boy was induced to plead 
 guilty to a charge of criminal assault on Maudie Tyerell, a girl under the age of 14, by the 
 representations of Detective Watson, is happy to-night. The details of this case are well known. 
 Detective Watson, it is alleged, went to arrest the boy on the above charge, and told the lad 
 and his mother that a conviction was sure, and that the sentence would be severe. It is also 
 
OF TOUONTO THE GOOD. !• 
 
 charged that the detective promised that if the boy pleaded guilty he would be let off, while if a 
 plea of not guilty was etiiered the punishment would be terrible. These affidavits are attested 
 by the affidavit of the prisoner and the prisoner's mother, while the circumstances of the case 
 strongly indicate that such a promise was made by the detective. The boy pleaded guilty and 
 the Magistrate sentenced him to five yeais at Kingston and 15 lashes. A certiorari was granted 
 with a view towards quashing the conviction, and it was returnable before the common pleas 
 divisional court over which Chief Justice Gait and Justice MacMahon piesided. Mr. Holmes 
 appeared on behalf of the prisoner. Mr. Cartwright, Q.C., Deputy Attorney-General sent word 
 that the case was one which the crown deemed unworthy of tneir defending, consequently 
 the conviction was undefended. Mr. Holmes read the affidavits and briefly outlined the case, 
 whereupon Chief [uctice Gait said that thp conviction of the boy Bailey was one of the most 
 outrageous proceedings he had ever heard of. 
 
 " I am ready," he said " to issue a peremptory order quashing the conviction and restor- 
 ing the boy to liberty at once." 
 
 " I concur," said Justice MacMahon. 
 
 The papers were immediately drawn up and sigiied by the judge annulling the conviction 
 and setting aside Magistrate Denison's warrant of commitment. Afterwards the judges issued 
 an order of protection to Magistrate I )enison and defective Watson to shield them from an 
 action for damages for false arrest, malicious prosecution, conspiracy &c. 
 
 The a'oove decision will .strike the averge reader as being in every 
 respect a just one. In commenting upon it, the Telegram says: 
 
 One of the worst of Colonel Denison's judgments was reversed yesterday by their Lord- 
 ships Chief Justice Gait, and Justice MacMahon. Their decision set a boy at liberty after a 
 confinement of more than five months and saved him from spending five years in the peniten- 
 tiary and enduring fifteen lashes. Seldom has there been on record a case that better illustrated 
 the inhumanity of some detectives and the offhand methods of Col. Denison. The boy was 
 taken from his mother's house late one night He left behind him the assurance that everything 
 was all right and that he would return in the morning. The next day the poor simpleton 
 pleaded guilty. Ke was not allowed time to consult his mother, and the Magistrate sentenced 
 him to five years in the penitentiary and fifteen lashes. The arrest, the trial; the conviction, the 
 sentence were all alike disgraceful. Detective Watson must have urged jhe boy to plead 
 guilty. Either under the pressure of advice from the detectives or in ignorance as to the 
 nature of the offence, the prisoner admitted guilt. Surely it was Colonel Denison's business to 
 warn the culprit that his plea wrecked all chance of liberty. But no. The detective was there 
 to secure credit of a conviction, and the Magistrate was there to fill the penitentiary Why 
 should they pause ? It only takes the court about three minutes to sentence a man to peniten- 
 tiary for five years. It takes the man somewhat longer to serve the term. Fortunately for him 
 the b»y had a mother who was not too poor to retain J. G. Holmes. The lawyer made a good 
 fight and finally freed the prisoner. There may be other boys sent to penitentiary under similar 
 circumstances, who having no money to right the wrong are suffering the injustice done to them 
 by a high-pressure police .Vlagistrate. Colonel Denison is generally right, but the case in point 
 is proof that he is not above trifling away a prisoner's liberty and ruining his life in order that 
 he may get through the day's work before eleven a.m. 
 
 In the above case it must strike the average beholder that if Detec- 
 tive Watson possessed the first iota of manhood, he would have given 
 the Magistrate to understand that it was through his instrumentality 
 that the boy pleaded guilty, but it is only one more of my contentions 
 that he who is able to fight his battle in a higher court will always 
 come out with justice. 
 
 A correspondent of the Telegram, who had received a courteous 
 reception from some of the ofllicers, considered it such a remarkable 
 occurrence that he felt that he must advertise it, and writes as follows, 
 under the heading of "A rara avis indeed." 
 
 Sir, — You often and very justly find fault with the police of Toronto for their incivility 
 to the public, but I want to say a word in their favour. To-day I went to the police station at 
 St. Andrew's market to a<k a question The se-geant on duty, a fine, well-built, red whiskered 
 man, answered me so politely and kindly and gave me all the information I wanted in such a 
 nice, pleasant and gentlemanly manner, that I feel that I ought to let it be known publicly, and 
 .«how that not all ot the police force are rude to the public. W.S.H. 
 
aO OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Immediately after the election of Mayor Fleming, and when it was 
 thought that a change would be made in the Morality Department the 
 Telegram published the following : 
 
 Hatred of what its name implies inspires much of the so-called hostility to the Morality 
 Department. The outcry against it was started by rogues who are pinched by its vigilance. 
 Their howl.s finally deceived respectable citizens into the belief that Inspector Archibald was 
 an ogre at the head of the branch of the pnblic service especially designed for the protection of 
 vice and the oppression of virtue. The truth i» that the Department in question is the least ' 
 expensive and the most humane branch of the police service. It pays for its support many 
 times ov'^r in the penalties that might but for it nevtr be enforced. How many children have 
 been shielded from cruel parents and brutal guardians by its kindly interference the secret • 
 records could tell. Its officers have been content to go on quietly doing their duty and their 
 silence has been misinterpreted as assent to the abuse that has been heaped upon the depart- 
 ment. The crusade has gone far enough, and it is time for those whose sympathies are on the 
 right side to speak a word for honest men who have fearlessly done their duty. 
 
 I do not for one moment doubt the sincerity of these remarks on 
 the part of the Telegram, but I do emphatically question their truth- 
 fulness. From the character of the Staff Inspector 1 do not think he 
 is the man to allow his light to be hidden under a bushel, and were 
 there any such cases as those mentioned by the Telegram, I think the 
 public would be made aware of them in some manner. It may perhaps 
 be stated that I am one of those who are pinched by its vigilance, and 
 without denying the trnth of the statement, I think I may consistently 
 and truthfully say that there can be no .«:uch imputation laid to the 
 door of the Hon. Mr. Meredith, who from his place in the House said : 
 
 My attention had been called to the fact that the law and Order Society of Toronto had 
 been discussing the morality department of Toronto, and passing resolutions eulogistic of the 
 department. Mr. Archibald, the officer of this department, and Mr. Curry, the Crown Attorney 
 had attended the meetings of this society and had frequently spoken there. I do not think this 
 is a proper course for public officers to pursue. They should not be partizans nor attend any 
 meetings, nor speak at them where they might become prejudiced. (Cheers). How would 
 the Attorney General like to see Jud£;:s attending such meetings .' Would it notbias their minds 
 against prisoners who might conie before them ? These officers had no right to identify them- 
 selves with any such society and he wished to call the attention of the Government to the fact. 
 
 Mr. Mowat said he had not heard of the matter before, but that he would look into it. 
 
 Mr. Meredith seems not to be alone in his opinion of the morality 
 department, for in the course of an address at a meeting of the Rate- 
 payers Association, Mr. R. Reynolds said: 
 
 The Morality department is too costly an 'affair. It should be abolished, but Inspector 
 Archibald and others, by appeals to religious bodies had secured sufficient influence to per- 
 petuate the system. Only a few days ago Inspector Archibald in the excess of his zeal had 
 arrested an innocent young man. There was far too much anxiety in the morality department 
 to make out cases. The ordinary police could do all the work, just as effectually, and at less 
 expenses. A most disgraceful affair had been reported of the efforts in New York of the moral- 
 ists to amend morals. A clergyman and two of his deacons had under disguise bribed women 
 to commit a sin. Any man who by a bribe tempted another to commit a sin no matter for 
 what end, was equally guilty as the person tempted. (Applause), and Rev. Dr. Parkhurst had 
 proved himself to be a low dirty blackguard, unfit to occupy a Christian pulpit. He had 
 degraded himself and his calling in making terms with unfortunate girls. As far as Toronto 
 was concerned they had heard a great deal about the so-called morality department, but who • 
 had ever seen any report from it ? All they knew about it was from newspaper reports. It was 
 a fact that in spite of that department t/iere were in the city to-day more unlicensed whiskey dives, - 
 more gambling dens, more houses of ill-fame than ever before. The depa'tment was not worth the 
 money spent on it. 
 
 If the public were given a fair field upon which to fight there would, 
 pet haps, not be such cause for complaint. If a person is arrested, and 
 then found innocent, he has no ground for damages, notwithstanding 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 21 
 
 » 
 
 the fact that his character may be ruined by the arrest. The following 
 cases win clearly demonstrate my meaning, and I leave the decision 
 with the public as to the justice of giving such advantages to the police 
 as they possess : 
 
 Counsel on behalf of the pbintiffin the case of Thomas Humphrey vs. Morality Ins- 
 pector Archibald, Detective Charles Slemin and Walter Duncan made an application before 
 the Master in Chambers to disclose the name of the person upon whose intormation he acted in 
 arresting the plaintiff. This was followed by a second application to compel the inspector to 
 attend for examination at his own expense. Humphrey, it will be remembered, it is the young 
 man who was arrested for committing rape on Miss Agnes Barnes. The girl could not give the 
 inspector a minute description of her assailant, but could only say that he had a small light 
 mustache, drove a Gladstone rig, and lived with his father on Spadma avenue. This inform- 
 ation, it was shown this morning was turned over to detective Slemin who failed in his attempt 
 to find out anything further until one evening while standing on the rear of a Spadina avenue 
 car he heard two men talking. From this piece of eaves-dropping he heard that this youne 
 man, Tbomas H. Humphrey, had got into trouble with a girl and had skipped to the United 
 States. Humphrey was promptly arrested, and in his^defense showed that from the 23rd of 
 April until December 12th, he was in the .States, and on the very day when the offence was 
 alleged to have been committed he was in Detroit. After a lengthy argument between Mr. J. 
 G. Holmes and Mr. Mowat, the Master in Chambers ruled that it would be a great injustice 
 to the police department. 
 
 Duncan and Margaret McLaren vs. Staff Inspector David Archibald. —This was an 
 appeal by the defendant from an order of the action, the plaintiff having been three times non- 
 suited at the Toronto assizes. Originally the action was brought against Inspector Archibald 
 to recover $10,000 damages for false arrest, malicious prosecution and for ..respass, McLaren 
 and his wife having been arrested on a charge of keeping a house of ill-fame, but not convicted. 
 The most notable nonsuit of this action was by Chief Justice Armour who in very forcible 
 language deprec^ced the action of the police in accepting the information of a woman about town 
 upon the strength of which the raid upon McLaren's house was made. Each time the plamtiff 
 has been non-suited he has moved for a new trial and each time has succeeded in setting aside 
 the non-suit and obtaining the new trial. The fourth order for a new trial is the one now 
 appealed against. Justices Hagarty and Osier dismissed the appeal, while Justices Burton and 
 MacLennan allowed it. The court being thus evenly divided the appeal stands dismissed, and 
 the action goes to trial again, in accordance with the judgment of the common pleas division 
 court. In giving judgment on the above action Chief Justice Haggarty said : 
 
 " While we are sitting here as judges we cannot forget we are citizens of Toronto, and it 
 was with great surprise that we learned the city was defending Inspector David Archibald. To 
 my mind it is the most disgraceful f>iece of presumption ever btought under the notice of this court. 
 I hope some person interested will enquire into this matter, and see if it is the general practice 
 for the citizens to bear the expense of defending actions brought against individuals who may 
 happen to be in their employ. " 
 
 I do not think the public will be disposed the insinuate that Chief 
 Justice Hagarty has any personal object in speaking as he did on the 
 subject, and his remarks therefore, carry that much more weight. If 
 contestants were to meet upon free and equal grounds there would be 
 no such cause for complaint, but to see the city screening men who are 
 palpably in the wrong, is a gross mis-carriage of justice. 
 
 Their interference with the public became such an aggravation that 
 the following is taken from a city paper : 
 
 " The police interfere with the public enough already," Col, Denison remarked from 
 the bench, as he was actively engaged in combatting the combined efforts of Mr. Curry and 
 Staff Inspector Archibald to persuade him that certain authority was vested in the force that he 
 was convinced did not really exist, t'atrol Sergeant Robinson and P. C. Kennedy visited tnc 
 cigar store kept by Alfred Beatty at No. 12 Queen street east, to search for liquor. There 
 was no interference by the proprietor of the store, but when the officers wanted to enter the 
 premises adjoining the store, Mr. Beatty demanded a warrant. 
 
 " I have none," replied the patrol sergeant. 
 
 " Then you cannot proceed any further," said Beatty, as he barred the door. 
 
 The police magistrate was asked to determine whether or not Beatty was guilty of obs- 
 tructing the policeman in the performance of his duty. He decided tht question adversely to 
 the police on all points referred to him. By his judgment a cigar store is not a place of public 
 
22 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 entertainment, that lo o'clock at night is not a reasonable time to make an inspection, that the 
 by-law only empowers an inspection of the shop, and a search of the premises other than the 
 shop cannot be made without a warrant. During the argument his Worship intimated that a 
 bylaw of the city could not override a federal svatute regarding a search for gambling, and 
 was, therefore, really impracticable. In illustrating his views the Magistrate asked if it was 
 reasonable to infer that because a man kept a licensed bowling alley, billiard parlor or roller 
 skating rink the mere fact of that license would empower the police to run all over his premises 
 and break open. They must confine themselves, he said, to the place actually licensed. 
 
 Mr. Curry — Well, one thing can be come. The license department can be asked to 
 cancel defendant's license. 
 
 The Magistrate — What has he done to warrant that ? Should his licence be cancelled 
 because he has been acquitted, simply having! stood on his rights ? The case was marked 
 dismissed. 
 
 The following case is clipped from the Empire : 
 
 Another serious blunder has been made by the officials of the morality department, and 
 the mistake has been the cause of the arrest of a highly respectable young man on a very serious 
 charge. Some days ago a little girl named Maggie Colestock went to the staff inspector's 
 department and laid a charge of criminal assault. Charles Goodman was taken into custody 
 and accused of the crime, but Inspector Archibald was surprised to find that he had made a 
 mistake, having arre.sted the wrong man. Goodman was immediately discharged the Magistrate 
 remarking that, he should never have been arrested. 
 
 The cajse for complaint against the Police Force seems to date 
 beyond all recollection. If you will go back to the Globe and consult 
 it at the time that Messrs Bunting, Meek and others were indicted for 
 conspiracy, you will read as fellows : 
 
 UNCIVIL AS USUAL. 
 
 It would seems from the behaviour'of some of the members of the Toronto police force 
 that it is part of their dutv to be as uncivil as possible, and this impression has certainly been 
 strengthened during the conspiracy investigation concluded at the police court yesterday. Soon 
 after .Mr. Kirkland came into court to hear the judgment of the magistrate, he felt faint and 
 asked a policeman to get him a chair. He was roughly told that there was no chair for him, 
 and he was obliged to stand until he finally fall on the floor exhausted. 
 
 In preparing the above cases against the police force, it may per- 
 haps be stated that I have given them from a prejudicial standpoint, 
 and to such a possible accusation, I am ready to acknowledge that it 
 is perfectly true. The personal experience I give you below has been 
 so salutary a lesson to me, that I say with perfect truth that if it were 
 in my power to rescue a squad of policemen whose lives were in danger 
 I would decline to do it, although I would not go so far as to say that 
 I would like to see them in such position, yet I feel that a more con- 
 temptible set of ruffians never donned a uniform. Some years ago a 
 young fellow of eighteen or thereabouts came to Toronto to see the 
 Exhibition, and during his stay he wandered down to the union station 
 to see if anyone came in by the train from his home, whom he knew. 
 While walking up and down the patform, Mr. Smart Policeman grabbed 
 him and on suspicion of his being a pickpocket or something else 
 equally definite, took him into the water closet, and searched him, 
 finding nothing of course. 
 
 " Now," said the illustrious guardian of the law, "clear out of this 
 and don't let mc see you again." 
 
 Outraged and humiliated the lad ^ot out as quickly as possible but 
 he had the good sense to make known his grievance where the effect 
 would be salutary. He went to the Mail office and informed one of 
 
OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 88 
 
 the reporters, who believed his story. He told how he had been insulted 
 and disgraced before the crowd at the Union station, and the next 
 morning the Mail contained an article on the subject. This had the 
 effect of bringing the matter before the Police Chief. Unfortunately, 
 however, the young man was obliged to return to his home before any 
 investigation could take place, though the Chief asked him, I believe 
 to remain. In relation to this case, I would like to ask. " What redress 
 could the young man get ? " Really none. By-laws innumerable are 
 framed for the protection of the force, but the public who pay them 
 must take their chances in cases of this kind. A city by-law we are 
 informed by Mr. Biggar permits a policeman to arrest a man if he does 
 not give his name. 
 
 It is still fresh in the minds of the people of Toronto how Rev. 
 W. F. Wilson was outraged by one of the force, and how throughout 
 the whole proceedings he was worsted in every court to which the case 
 was carried, until finally he was refunded his costs by the council. 
 
 It is a matter that may fairly be stated that if the policemen were 
 the immaculate guardians they are anxious to have the public believe 
 they are, there might be some excuse for these outrages being perpe- 
 trated, but they are nc \ 
 
 I have seen men — proprietors of saloons present members of the 
 force with something (likely water) in bottles quite frequently. The 
 manner in which it is done is quite amusing The landlord would 
 stand at the door with his hands at his back, and look carefully up 
 and down. By and bye a big policeman would loom up in the distance, 
 and when the time was propitious the bottle would be handed to the 
 stalwart guardian of the law. This isn't hearsay evidence either, it is 
 what I saw myself, and while it would serve no good purpose to tell 
 the name of this particular man, I may say that if anyone thinks him- 
 self aggrieved he might enter a suit for libel, and I will give the names 
 with pleasure. 
 
 Some years ago some little lads were playing near some one of 
 the wharves, and as it is contrary for some one of the multifarious by- 
 laws of the city regulating boys, a policeman ordered them to come to 
 him at once. As the hardened little wretches did not obey with suffi- 
 cient alacrity and also had the supreme hardihood to smile at the 
 majesty of the law, the policeman shot one dead. Now the peculiarity 
 of this case was the fact that this policeman was arrested, tried, and 
 though a master effort was made by Mr. Nicholas Murphy, Q.C., to 
 have him discharged, a jury really had the hardihood to convict him 
 of manslaughter, and to this day, I am pleased to say he is doing penance 
 in durance vile for his act, or if he isn't he ought to be, yet I believe 
 some time ago an effort was made to have him released, a prayer that 
 was not entertained by the Department of Justice, with their charac- 
 teristic good sense. 
 
 For the benefit of the public I give my own personal experience, 
 and all tha particulars connected therewith. On a certain street, the 
 name of which b not a necessary adjunct to this work is a kind of 
 
':W ■ OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 restaurant, where it is rumoured that in addition to the eating and 
 drinking allowed by law, there can also be obtained the drink not 
 allowed by law. One Sunday night passing down this street, I had 
 the good fortune or otherwise to see two policemen enter this 
 place. The first one entered the door, and passed in, while the other 
 took out a little book and made some entry therein, then making 
 some remarks to the proprietress, also entered, and the three passed 
 into some back room together. All this I saw myself, and the police- 
 men remained there some eight or ten minutes. During the course of 
 the evening I had passed through this street quite a number of times, 
 and the officers had, doubtless seen me, and at midnight or perhaps a 
 little later I passed down on one side of the street, while the two offi- 
 cers were coming up on the other. One of them crossed over, and 
 demanded what my name, address and business were. I informed him 
 very promptly that it was no concern of his, 
 
 '• Here now," he exclaimed angrily, with a broad Scotch accent, 
 " I want your name and address and yer business." 
 
 All of which information I declined to furnish. 
 
 "I want yer name and address now, or ye know the consequences," 
 he again demanded in a passion. His voice, like his temper, was 
 gradually rising to a high pitch that would have delighted an ambi- 
 tious tenor singer. 
 
 " And I don't intend to give you either," I replied. " What right 
 have you to stop me on the street like this ? As a citizen of Toronto I 
 claim the right to walk up and down any street in the city that I wish, 
 and you have no right to intercept me as long as I am conducting my- 
 self properly. If I do wrong you have the right to arrest me, not 
 otherwise." 
 
 However, he was inexorable, and again demanded my name and 
 address, adding : 
 
 " Unless ye give it to me, I'll take ye to No. 2 station." 
 
 " On what charge ? " I asked. " Vagrancy ? That won't do, as I 
 happen to have sufficient money on my person to pay my board for a 
 month in the best hotel in the city." 
 
 Strange to say this latter remark was true. 
 
 " Do you know the character of the street you're on ? " he asked. 
 " Answer me that." 
 
 " I do perfectly well. I have been on this street scores of times 
 and know it perfectly." 
 
 By this time he seemed to have grown out of patience, and 
 demanded: 
 
 " Where are ye goin' now ? " ' 
 
 " I'm on my way home, but I want you to understand that it is 
 not that I met you that I am going." 
 
 " Well go on now. It's just such damned young toughs as you 
 that makes the town what it is," and as I passed he made a pass at me 
 with his closed fist. 
 
 Now that is the case exactly as it stands and and as it occurred. 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 2ft 
 
 « 
 
 I submit that if the policeman had any right to arrest me or even 
 molest me, he would have taken me under arrest at once, but I am 
 convinced that he was afraid that I had seen him and his friend going 
 into the dive I have mentioned, and dared not face the consequences. 
 Had they arrested me I should have certainly made known the circum- 
 stances I have just mentioned, but as it was I stated the case to the 
 city editor of one of the city papers, who informed me that the police- 
 man had no right so stop me on the street, and he strongly recom- 
 mended me to make a formal complaint to the Commission, but my 
 own reason dictated otherwise, feeling quite sure that I would have had 
 my labour for my pains. 
 
 This view of mine is amply corroborated by the following from 
 the Telegram : 
 
 There are evil possibilities in this idea of allowing the police commissioners sitting in secret 
 to cancel the license of a livery man who may, for reasons good or bad, be viewed with suspi- 
 cion by the detectives. The experience of the average citizen who has had a difficulty between 
 him and the police adjusted by the commissioners will not increase faith in the judgment of 
 their worships. The commission is a good deal of an automatic register for recording the decrees 
 of our uniformed fellow citizens, whose worais often taken before the oath rf citizens in plain clothes. 
 Too much officialism is a danger peculiar to this time. It is not well to give judicial powers to 
 a body that is partisan in the sense that it is often on the aide' of the policeman and against the 
 civilian. The possibility that thieves might be occasionally aided by a livery man is not a graver 
 public danger than the probability that the commissioners may wrongfully cancel the license of 
 a man who has given no just cause for complaint. 
 
 It is a matter of regret that those who are fined and imprisoned 
 for taking their own part against the police of the city have not means 
 to carry thtir cases to a higher court. If a judgment be given against 
 them they will feel that it is just. If they receive judgment in their 
 favour it will be for the same reason. The following case is one where 
 the defendant had this courage, and received the just judgment of the 
 court: 
 
 The case of young Skeans against Inspector Stephen was resumed with Skeans in the 
 box. He detailed the circumstances of his arrest, claiming thathe should have been summoned. 
 He testified that judge Macdougall when hearing the appeal, said that the Inspector exceeded 
 his duty as a police ufficer by making the arrest when a summons would have answered, irthur 
 Crozier, the boy in the case, first witness tor the defence, told how he and some others boys 
 were throwing some banana skins, playing tag, swearing, etc., when Skeans came up, cuffed 
 him, and kicked him in the stomach. Crozier swore that he, unlike Peck's bad boy, threw no 
 sticks, broke no windows, fired " nothing at nobody ", never annoyed the ticket agent at the 
 wharf. The inspector testified that he saw Skeans knock Crozier down ; Crozier swore that 
 Skeans kicked, the boy cried, the officer arrested, a constable appeared, Skeans told who he was 
 but the inspector thought it best to make the arrest, the constable escorted the young merchant, 
 while the superior followed with the boy and the party went to No. 3. The boy received the full 
 benefit of Skean's boot. Judge McDougall did not say that he (witness) exceeded his duty, 
 though he thought a summons would have answered the purpose. Upon cross-examin;ition the 
 inspector said he didn't hear a policeman say that no other man on the force but himself would 
 have made the arrest; neither would he swear that the boy didn't tell him he was badly hurt. 
 Mr. Johnson put judge McDougall right the inspector said when Mr. I luvernet asked him if 
 Mr. Johnson did not protest against the judge's censure of Stephen. Johnson defended, against 
 the appeal in Judge McDougall's court. Cnarles Sheppard swore that the John Hanlan did 
 not come to Brock street wharf that day ; Crozier nwore positively that it did. Sheppard is 
 the ticket agent at the place Crozier was hitting gentleman with a stick and banana skins and 
 swearing loudly. The jury returned a verdict giving $250.00 to Skeans. 
 
 It is circumstances of this nature that prejudice the public against 
 the police force, and it is not too much to say that if a policeman gets 
 into trouble and is likely to get overpowered, there is not one citizen 
 
26 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 in a dozen who would assist him voluntarily. I have seen men thrown 
 into the patrol waggon by a policeman and if the prisoner lifted his 
 head or perhaps did nothing at all he would find a pair of knees on 
 his chest and he would be thoroughly belaboured until he was knocked 
 into senselessness or reason. I have seen cases where the policemen 
 have been hooted by a crowd of respectable citizens when they were 
 putting some drunken wretch into the waggon, simply on account of 
 their cruelty. To those who are too poor to employ counsel to fight 
 their battles, it will be advisable to always submit to arrest whether 
 you are guilty or not ; you are generally assumed to be guilty, and if 
 you want any stronger evidence than my word refer to the cases of 
 Allan or O' Reilly, and you will be convinced of the wisdon of my 
 advice, and the judiciousness of complying with it, not to mention the 
 possibility of being clubbed almost to death as in the case of O'Connor 
 previously mentioned. 
 
 It will be remembered that the force on one night attempted to 
 raid the house of one Lyons, and that the latter objected to be raided. 
 So much so did he object that he was brought before the sessions 
 charged with the crime of unlawfully attempting to shoot P, C. Wallace. 
 Mr. Lyons, like the sensible man that he is fought it out in the court, 
 and the following is the result, which confirms the advice given by me, 
 that if you wish to secure your rights and are able to pay for getting 
 them, make a fight for them, and the justice of the judge in charge will 
 decide whether you are right or wrong : 
 
 When the general sessions opened Judge Macdougall proceeded to deliver judgment 
 upon ob ections raised by Mr. DuVernet in behalf of Patrick Lyons charged with unlawfully 
 attempting to shoot P. C. Wallace under circumstances already detailed. His honour 
 dismissed the prisoner, holding that the search warrant under which Wallace was acting was 
 invalid for two reasons. First, that the initials " J. P. " after the name of Hugh Miller did not 
 properly designate that he was a justice of the peace, and duly qualified to issue the warrant, 
 and second, that the face of the warrant did not represent that he was actini; in the stead or at 
 the written request of the Magistrate. " The warrant," said his honour, " is similar to the 
 peculiar documents now being freely used by the police, and I feel bound to say that had Lyons 
 shot the officer dead, he could not have been convicted of murder. The crime would not be 
 more serious than manslaughter, because the officer was forcing an entrance at his peril with a 
 bad warrant." Mr. Dewart requested his honour to reserve a case but the Crown attorney's 
 request was not complied with. 
 
 I can only ascribe the tyranny of the police force to one cause. 
 An overwhelming majority of them, knowing themselves to be the scum 
 that they are, are aware that the only chance they have of speaking to 
 a gentleman is to tell him to " move on," or to associate with one is to 
 arrest him, seize upon every pretext to do either one or the other not 
 knowing how long it will be before another opportunity presents itself. 
 I have lived in Buffalo, Ottawa, Montreal and different American 
 cities and I found the police in these cities at least gentlemanly. 
 
 I have given you these circumstances to demonstrate the truth- 
 fulness of my remarks, and I think anyone imbued with the first ele- 
 ments of justice will admit the reasonablene.ss of my contention that 
 there is very little chance of justice being done in the present condi- 
 tion of things. Take an as example the McLaren case against the 
 staff inspector. A woman about town gives information and the house 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 2t 
 
 occupied by these people is raided, and they were not convicted. Dis 
 graced beyond all chance of redemption, they seek for redress, and 
 what a sarcasm it is on institutions that are visionarily democratic. 
 This family sue the inspector for damages, and are compelled to employ 
 counsel at a very great expense to themselves, while the inspector who 
 happens to be employed by the city is defended by the city solicitor 
 who is paid by the taxes from these people, when in all justice it would 
 seem that he should be compelled to pay his own counsel. While it 
 may be argued that it did not require much ability to fight the city 
 solicitor's department, Mr. Justice Hagarty nevertheless, expressed 
 himself in language that will receive pretty general commendation 
 everywhere else where British fair play is appreciated. 
 
 Time, however that sovereign balm for all human sufferings, may > 
 perhaps assist us. It is a remarkably pregnant portion of ancient his- 
 tory, where holy write assures us that Providence having permitted his 
 chosen people to be oppressed by the Egyptians for centuries, finally 
 delivered them and vanquished their enemies, and also that Job, after 
 being subjected tothemost diabolical treatment that Satanic ingenuity 
 could invent, was finally restored to his old time prestige and health by 
 the intervention of a divine Providence, so we may hope to receive from 
 the same Providence who sees and knows our sufferings that aid we 
 stand so munch in need of. Augusta J. Evans Wilson informs us that 
 every Gethsemane has its strengthening angels ; the agonies of the 
 graden, she says brought them to Christ. That there may some day- 
 be a deliverance is quite within the range of possibility. I regret to 
 say that in the report for last year no deaths occurred on the force, but I 
 have much pleasure in pointing out that two men have been sent to 
 the Insane Asylum. However, a glance at the ages of the men on the 
 force may give us hope, and that even if the Commissioners and the 
 council fail to assist us we still have the leveller of all mankind, the 
 grim reaper, to accomplish this relief. Some of us may not live to enjoy 
 the repose afforded by the new order of things, but we shall, perhaps, 
 receive the everlasting commiseration of coming ages, when the tradi- 
 tion of our long suffering is handed down to them, and who will feel 
 thankful, at least, that the opinion that policemen, like annuitants, live 
 forever, is not so. 
 
 SOCIETY. 
 
 In Toronto poverty is not exactly a crime, but it is sufficient of an 
 inconvenience to make everyone very desirous of not possessing it. 
 Society is pretty much in Toronto what it is everywhere else except 
 that money is the chief requisite here. In smaller places men who can 
 boast of respectability and a character free from blemish are welcomed 
 into good society with perfect good grace and as much warmth as 
 though they were millionaires. In Toronto an unprincipled knave, if 
 he keep his wickedness from becoming absolutely notorious can secure 
 entrance to the best social circles. 
 
18 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 A large number of those who occupy mansions are those who have 
 risen from the ranks, which is greatly to their credit, for every intelli- 
 gent person takes pride in the fact that in this country it is in the 
 power of anyone to rise as high as his abilities will carry him. Society 
 is somewhat clannish, and the members of a certain church find their 
 intimate friends in the congregation of the same. 
 
 Occasionally a man will be found coming from his distant English 
 home and announce himself as the scion of some of the mobility of the 
 British Empire, and he is received with open arms. If my memory 
 serves me correctly some years ago a Mr. Ballantyne appeared like a 
 miteor in our midst, and announced himself as the descendant of the 
 much abused Irish landlords, who had been obliged to live somewhat 
 abstemiously owing to the bad condition of landed property in that 
 country. He founded, I believe, a club called the Dickens Club, and 
 after a pleasant sojourn amongst us he left like the swallows for a 
 warmer clime, and finally we heard of him in New Orleans where he 
 was committed for something or other, and as is customary in such 
 cases he laid the blame at the door of society — that society upon which 
 he had lived for many a lotvc; iay, 
 
 When a short time ago our city was honored with the distin- 
 guished presence of one of the members of the Royal family of France, 
 the Telegram rose to remark concerning him : 
 
 JEROMi^ OF MONTE CARLO. 
 
 If it be the true function of good society to recognize worth and ignore worthlessness, the 
 good society of Toronto and other cities does not appear to particularly good advantage 'S 
 the admiring host of Prince Jerome Bonaparte. 
 
 This effete heir to a great but evil name might be a good deal better than the general 
 character of his house. He might be, but is he ? The family greed of Prince Jerome is not 
 redeemed by valour, and his other traits are said to be Napoleonic in their meanness, if not in 
 their influence upon the world's history 
 
 In Toronto and Ottawa the boss of Monte Carlo was received and honoured as if he were 
 a prince and a great man in Israel. The society leaders who welcomed the prince were far 
 from well employed, for surely Jerome's business is no passport to the esteem of Canada's 
 best people. 
 
 There are two or three society events in the course of the season, 
 St. Andrew's Ball ; the Royal Canad'an Yacht Club Ball; and the 
 affairs at Government House, all of which bring out society's youth, 
 beauty and wealth. The doings of society are chronicled every week 
 in Saturday Night and in addition to the society of the city, the out of 
 town events are also chronicled. 
 
 The following clippings are taken from that journal: 
 
 Mr. Grenville P. Kleiser, whose success as an elocutionist in Toronto is not forgotten, 
 has met with very gratifying success in Portland, 'Jregon, and other western cities. 
 
 One of the most successful of the good Friday concerts was given in the Central Metho- 
 dist chuich, Mr. Harold Jarvis sang beautifully, and a new elocutionary light, Miss Marguerite 
 Baker gave a couple of recitations. A vast crowd of nice people sat seriously in the cosy pews, 
 and the programme, beir^g of a grave and almost entirely sacred character, was in harmony 
 with the spirit of the hour. 
 
 A very sweet and lovely Toronto maiden has joined the ranks of the matrons, since Miss 
 De Jones of Gloucester street because Mrs. Brown, last Wednesday evening. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 29 
 
 The foregoing is a fair sample of what appears every week, and 
 as it is a fair subject for criticism, I will ask the careful consideration 
 of sensible people to some of the paragraphs I have copied. I have 
 nothing to say against giving a simple chronicle of an event, but I'm 
 sure a generous public must consider itself edified by such a notice as 
 the following : 
 
 " A very sweet and lovely Toronto maiden has joined the ranks of the matrons kc." 
 
 I forbear giving the further particulars of the case, as the lady in 
 question doubtless had little idea of the use that was being made of 
 her name, and it occurs to me that people must be of a degenerate 
 turn of mind, if they can appreciate such trash. The announcement of 
 the Good Friday concert in the Central Methodist Church is on a par 
 with the above announcement. 
 
 " A vast crowd of nice people sat seriously in the pews &c " 
 
 But for really charming originality I think the following taken 
 from the Niagara correspondence of that journal caps the climax : 
 
 '' Miss DeSmyth of Buffalo, whose beauty and grace are so much admired, has beerj 
 visiting relatives in town." 
 
 If the young lady in question, whose name I have changed — from 
 that feeling of Christian charity that always actuates me — possesses 
 the good legitimate common sense that heaven usually endows earthly 
 mortals with, she will scarcely feel flattered with this florid and inane 
 compliment to her beauty and grace. Novelists, from their privileged 
 position, are permitted to rave as much as they like, and we accept it 
 as a matter of course, but in private life mankind is disposed to regard 
 a notice like the above in the light of vapour from some water brained 
 sycophant, rather than as the production of a sensible correspondent 
 who deals with facts, and gives the movements of society in a manner 
 that common sense would seem to demand. 
 
 I think the great majority of sensible people will come to the 
 reasonable conclusion that such drivel as the foregoing sounds like the 
 price a social parasite is paying for being tolerated in polite society, 
 that is if they are invited to the houses of the people they write 
 about, which is extremely doubtful. 
 
 The most sensible articles I ever read were published in the Satur- 
 day Globe, " sweet," "lovely" and similar gush were eschewed,— a 
 simple chronicle being given. I took the following from the Empire 
 during the Parliamentary session of 1894: 
 
 One of the most winsome of women I have met in Ottawa is Mrs Schultz, the wife of 
 the Lieutenant-Governor. She captures one's aflfections instantly just by her sweet womanliness 
 and the great tenderness for all things human, the reverence for all things good that is in her. 
 
 Lady Thompson the wife of Canada's Premier is fair and placid, slow and gentle of 
 speech and wins the regard of all who meet her by the simple kindliness of her manner which 
 sets even the shyest stranger at once at ease. 
 
 I^dy Caron is a very pleasant and unaffected little ladv, with whom one feels instantly at 
 home, and Miss Caron, a bright and graceful little demoiselle ably assists in the discharge of 
 the onerous social duties. 
 
 Of Mrs Ives the wife of the President of the Council, who in the charming home they 
 have chosen for the session, entertains so delightfully it were impossible to speak without 
 enthusiasm. 
 
^0 OK TORONTO THK GOOD. 
 
 Mr«. CiMttigan, wife of the Secretary of Slate, is full of motherly kindness and good 
 nature, which, witn her sincerity and originality of speech, wins her a very loyal circle of friendi. 
 
 Madame Anders, the pretty winsome wife of the Minister of Agriculture, is a great favorite 
 in Ottawa society circles, and upon reception days her drawing room is always well filled. 
 
 Mrs. Foster is one of the most attractive ol the Cabinet Ministers' wives. A quiet, gentle, 
 sincere little lady of more than ordinary culture and attainment. 
 
 Mr. McNeill is one of the nice members of the Mouse ; a man thoroughly liked and 
 respected by his confreres. (Jf quiet eitective speech, and equally quiet courtesy of manner- 
 there are few, indeed, to be found who have an ill word for the member for North Hruce. 
 
 Mr. Sam Hughes is not onlv nice looking but one of the nicest members of the Com- 
 mons. He i- looked upon in the llouse as a clever young politician, albeit he is occasionally 
 disposed to rlo some original thinking. 
 
 The g.Tlleri«s like Mr. Haggart, he looks so big and strong .ind determined, resolute and 
 tempery as the great iron horse, whose comings and goings he regulates. Yet with the determ* 
 ination and the strength there is always a suggestion of kindness. 
 
 " He looks like a fighter — one who could hit hard," said the member's wife. 
 
 " He would make a strong enemy or a most loyal friend." I said. 
 
 It is said that this great strong man is really shy, especiall> of women, He wouldn't be 
 If he knew how kindly they loaked down upon him from the gallery. 
 
 I submit the above for the consideration of an unprejudiced public, 
 desiring only to observe that if the writer were a candidate for the 
 Civil Service and did not receive an appointment, the Ministry was but 
 a crowd of brutes impervious to adulation. 
 
 At a representative public meeting held in one of the halls of the 
 city, which had been called to commemmorate the history of some by- 
 law in connection with the curtailing of the liquor traffic a gentleman 
 employed by one of the city newspapers invited me to go and hear the 
 addresses. Some thirty-five or forty people were on the platform, and 
 my friend called my attention to quite a large number who were in- 
 debted to his paper, and who, he stated, were so situated that it was 
 utterly impossible for them to collect the money from them. 
 
 "There is a man," he said pointing to a thick-set, sweet faced in- 
 dividual, "who owes us $3.45. When the Central Bank failed we were 
 given to understand that it was on that account that he was unable to 
 pay us. In strict truth that was the reason, but instead of being a 
 depositor, the actual fact was that he was indebted to the bank itself, 
 and therefore, when it closed its doors he was left without the means 
 of paying the account, and the published statement of the debtors of 
 the bank showed him to be very largely indebted to it." 
 
 " There is another man," he said, pointing to a clerical looking 
 chap. " who used to be a preacher. Some time ago he had been in the 
 habit of making visits to different parishes in connection with church 
 work, I think it was, and in an evil hour when putting up at a hotel, 
 he asked the proprietor to make out his bill and add a larger amount 
 than was really due. This would be paid by the people interested, and 
 the balance was to be refunded by the proprietor to the preacher. By an 
 unlucky chance he met the wrong man for his purpose, and the hotel 
 proprietor disclosed the whole thing." 
 
 " He is no longer in the ministry then ? " 
 
 " No, when these matter came out, I believe he was expelled but 
 it has not impaired his usefulness in the least He still talks prohibi- 
 
' OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 81 
 
 tion and the cause does not seem to have suffered by his acts. You see 
 that elderly man with the Prince Albert coat, sitting with his chin 
 resting in the palm of his hand ? " 
 
 " Yes." 
 
 " He is another of our debtors. A great man for writihg to the 
 newspapers, and owes us nine dollars." 
 
 "Can't you collect it from him ?" 
 
 "No, we have tried repeatedly, bnt find there is absolutely no use 
 in suing him, so we were compelled to write it off to bad and doubtful." 
 
 By this time the hall had begun to fill up rapidly, and there seemed 
 to be little room for those who wished to secure seats in the front. 
 
 " Shall we push up to the front, or shall we remain here. If we wish 
 to get to the fiont we will have to hurry up or stay where we are." 
 
 " What do you say it we go ? To tell you the truth I feel like the 
 guest without the wedding garments amongst this crowd of moralists." 
 
 " Very well, if you wish to go, let us do so by all means." 
 
 Professor Goldwin Smith, I think it is who informs us that the 
 real aristocracy is the aristocracy of the mind, but what has the prof- 
 essor to say of the aristocracy of those who constitute themselves our 
 moral teachers ? Are they not to be most highly commended for their 
 zeal and self-sacrifice and are their efforts on behalf of humanity to 
 count for nothing ? The professor may be right, and while I acknow- 
 ledge that my own code of morality extends no higher than to those 
 who pay their debts, yet it must be borne in mind that a man wno 
 constitutes himself a " teacher " or a " fisher of men ", and who does 
 not pay his debts is counted greater than that man who, satisfied with 
 things as they are, lives his life quietly and unostentatiously, but who 
 does not think he has a mission to interfere with the privileges of those 
 who does not agree with him. 
 
 The people I have mentioned could easily be multiplied probably 
 by hundreds. It is astonishing how men, who being absolutely bailiff 
 proof, will pose as leaders of great moral movements, when one might 
 consistently imagine that they would first pay their debts and then* 
 teach morality afterwards. At a public meeting held in the city some 
 little time ago, out of some forty eight men on the platform, only 
 fourteen were indebted to one of the city newspapers, and they were 
 absolutely uncollectible. As our mutual friend Colonel Ingersoll would 
 say : " I can rob Smith if he will trust me. God forgives me, and 
 threatens to punish Smith if he don't. But how is that going to help 
 Smith?" 
 
 I have frequently puzzled myself to describe the relative position 
 of the man who holds his property or his bank account in his wife's 
 >name. Can she be called his wife, or is she merely his accomplice ? Is 
 he her husband or merely her gentleman usher ? 
 
 I was amused at ?, little episode in a newspaper office, where it is 
 the custom to write off to Bad and Doubtful every three months such 
 accounts as are deemed i^ncollectible. A certain gentleman had an 
 advertising account considerably in arrears, and the accountant and 
 
82 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 manager were discussing the probabilities of its being paid. Suddenly 
 the manager turned to another clerk and asked : 
 
 "C — , do you know this man, A — of S. — ?" 
 
 "No, not personally, but I know that he leads the bible class in 
 St. P. church Sunday school." 
 
 " Oh." the manager ejaculated, and then turning to the account- 
 ant he added : 
 
 " In that case, Mr. W — , you had better write it off to Bad and 
 Doubtful." 
 
 A correspondent who perhaps has had some experience with our 
 " moral teachers " writes to the Telegram as follows : 
 
 Sir, — No more dishonest action on the part of residents of this city can be imagined than 
 the practice which is too general at present namely, the transfer of property from a husband to 
 a wife. Of course it is really a swindle and is done to bar out creditors from the first payment 
 of their debts. T can name many people in this city who live in style upon our more private 
 streets such as Jarvis, Sherbourne, St. George and others, who are so situated, and who can 
 hold expensive pews in our fashionable cathedral and other churches, observe the lenten season 
 with extraordinary affectation of piety, live in luxury with their families, whilst, with the most 
 flagrant dishonesty, poor, trusting creditors can realize nothing from the husband because of 
 the iniquitous transfer of his property to his wife. Of course, the woman is just as bad as the 
 man, who connives at such actions. Were the names of these people published it would cause 
 a sensation in the religious and social circles in which these well dossed families move. The 
 ftard-wotking, honest people to whom they are indebted and who have given them credit in 
 ignorance of the state of affairs are just laughed at by these debtors when they are asked to 
 pay. Some quick and decisive mode of legal punishment should be at hand in such cases. It 
 js dishonesty of the meanest kind, because the poor creditor is in ignorance of the true state of 
 matters, and it is t^n times worse than the act of the miserable wretch who to satisfy hunger, 
 steals a loaf of bread and is punished for the theft by imprisonment in our goal. Every such 
 transfer should be published with the names of the parties in our daily papers, and the public- 
 ation paid for by the Government, Let those well-dressed imposters be shown up. — Citizen. 
 
 THE PRESS. 
 
 The press of Toronto is a subject that ought to receive at least a 
 work written exclusively upon it, and in this work it is impossible to 
 give more than a hurried review of it. It can be devided into two 
 classes, the secular and religious. In the former are included all the 
 political and literary journals of the city. 
 
 The morning papers of Torontp are amongst the ablest and best 
 conducted in America, as well as among the most brilliant in the world. 
 
 Their power is very great and they shape to a very large extent 
 the tone of the Provincial journals; they are conducted upon a most 
 excellent system as far as their internal arrangements are concerned, 
 and the men employed upon them are sometimes the persons of ability 
 and experience. 
 
 They are the Mail and Empire, the Globe and the World, repre- 
 senting the two political parties, and in addition, w'th the exception of 
 the World, the same papers publish evening editions, and the Telegram,j 
 Star and News are then added to the list. The latter are a noticeable 
 feature of the city, as they all cost but one cent a copy, and contain all 
 the latest news, gossip, and a variety of light and entertaining matter ; 
 they are bought chiefly by persons who wish to read them at home 
 after the cares and fatigues of the day are over. The first issues are at 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 38 
 
 twelve o'clock noon, and the latest at half past hve or six o'clock. On 
 occasions of more than ordinary interest extras are issued as late as 8 
 or 9 o'clock. On the day of the execution of Birchall the special edition 
 of the Telegram, published immediately after the execution aggregated 
 the enormous total of forty -seven thousand all of which were sold in 
 the city. 
 
 Appropos of the Birchall trial the following from the pen of Mr. 
 E. E. Sheppard, of Saturday Night, which contains a criticism of the 
 press may not be out of place. At present he contributes a page to 
 Saturday Night over the signature of Don, and I give his sketch, sug- 
 gested by the mention of this case. 
 
 " Have you heard that the devil is dead ? " exclaimed an acquaintance of mine in response 
 to an invitation to tell me something new Odd, isn't it, how a senseless rejoinder of this sort 
 sometimes rings in a fellow's ears and rattles around in the empty places of his mind. This 
 saying clung to me all day and as I sit down to work in the evening it is the first thing that 
 suggests itself a« a text. 
 
 One slips very easily from the above topic to the great loss Birchall will be to the daily 
 newspapers hereabouts. Poor devil, he is gone, and even yet the press is full of him. Even 
 his hangman has been glorified by publicity which is never given to the man or woman who 
 throughout a life of .•ielfdeiiial and good works tries to rescue the fallen and reduce the woes 
 of the wretched. I don't think the value of the devil to the daily newspapers was ever better 
 proven than by the disgraceful exhibition the Aftii/ bus made of itself in publishing the autho- 
 biography of a young reprobate who, if he had anything in his nature of an interesting sort, it 
 was the careless good-nature with which he asserted before all mankind that he cared tor neither 
 God nor man. This moral idiot, who squandered his patrimony, ruined those who trusted him, 
 degraded those who associated with him, violated everything held sacred by gentlemen, took 
 the life of a comrade who followed him, lied to the clergyman who prayed with him, and in 
 every possible way tried to prove by his life and his writings that virtue is a delusion, religion 
 a farce, and honor .1 snare, ha.s been lionized by the newspapers more than any other man who 
 ever died on Canadian soil What he has written has brought a higher price than anything 
 that before was produced in Canada. His photograph has appeared more numerously, sketches 
 — Mrfiich are evidently those of a libertine — of ballet giris who have nothing to recommeid them 
 but the shape of their legs, have been given as works of art, and this monster of perfidy has in 
 this way been placed before every Canadian as a singularly gifted and courageous per.son. The 
 Afat'i, with cant which is utterly loathsome, has pretended that its publication of Birchall's 
 biography was intended to teach a moral lesson. Such cant, such leprous hypocrisy, it is to be 
 hoped, sickened the public even while they read the degraded and degrading maunderings of 
 the convicted murderer. The Afai/, which is fighting for Protestantism, which is ready to carry 
 a banner in the procession of prohibitionists, which was not unwilling, at a critical moment, to 
 play traitor to the party which had nourishe dit, had but to reveal this last and most contemptible 
 phase of its character to be thoroughly understood as a fake and the scarlet woman of journal- 
 ism. It matters little to the majority of people what a newspaper advocates so long as it be 
 thoroughly understood what the declared province of the paper is to be Tho-^e who take and 
 read the Police Gazette know what they are subscribing for, but a newspaper which pretend^, to 
 be pure and lacks no opportunity of being prurient may mislead, must indeed degrade, those 
 who want purity but are seduced into reading pruriency by fa.'se pretences. 
 
 There are many other newspapers besides the Mail that deserve the harshest possible 
 criticism for their conduct in this matter. The Telegram, for instance, which boasts of the 
 enormous editions it sold descriptive of the hanging and last moments of Birchall, apologizes 
 by saying that the newspapers only provide what the people want. The demi-monde explain 
 their existence in the same way and claim to be a necessary evil. Nobody associates with them 
 who would not be ashamed to take th°m to their home and introduce them to mother or sister. 
 Must not a newspaper which feels that it is unfit to be introduced into a family and put into the 
 hands of innocence have much the same contempt for its calling of the woman of the street lias 
 for herself as she solicits the passer-by ? It is a dreadful apology to offer and yet it is the one 
 made by the Globe and the balance of those who have been in the same work and who fight 
 with one another in draping with pretty verbal garments the unclean and demoralizing things 
 they have published. How glad these newspapers must be that the devil isn't dead ! 
 
 It is not my purpose to write what properly belongs to the news- 
 papers in reference to the woman who posed as a female martyr at the 
 ignominious end of the career of a most unmitigated scoundrel and 
 
34 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 blackguard, but it should not be forgotten that this Mrs. Birchall did 
 not scruple by false pretences to pose as Lady Somerset, a title to which 
 she knew perfectly well that she had no claim. And her sister Mrs. 
 West Jones also received her share of the newspaper notoriety accorded 
 to this illustrious family, and did not fail to let the newspapers have 
 full particulars of her actions. For instance when she went to the opera 
 house (which was doubtless in excellent taste at such a time), the fact 
 was duly chronicled in the press, hence the murder was not without its 
 advantages as it gave to the two women that delightful sense of notor- 
 iety so dear to the female heart. 
 
 The life of a newspaper man, both as regards the editorial and 
 business departments is not by any means a bed of roses. First of all 
 you have to deal with correspondents, of which there are some thous- 
 ands, all of whom have their pet scheme to put before an indulgent 
 public, and all of them are, of course, intended for the benefit of this 
 same public. Some years ago the Saturday Telegram would have 
 column after column of bosh written by correspondents who assured us 
 that if their schemes were carried out Tornnto would go up by leaps 
 and bounds, which at that time was a favourite expression, and it may 
 not be out of place to state that the writers of these articles had about 
 as much idea of municipal matters as a child might be expected to 
 have. I am not aware whether the Telegram has precluded them from 
 their columns or whether they have become disgusted with the lack of 
 success their efforts have called forth, but it is certain that these non- 
 sensical letters are not inserted with that frequency that once held 
 sway. 
 
 On one occasion there appeared a letter from one man, who pre 
 faced his remarks with the announcement that he was a poor man, 
 and that the constant ringing of the bells on the Grand Trunk trains 
 kept him from sleeping, and he proceeded to characterize this as an 
 outrage, breathing vengeance. It is quite likely that the company, 
 therefore, changed its entire system of signals in conformity with his 
 request. 
 
 Another, who described hiiaself as a working man, held forth on 
 the criminality of some one of the fire stations for not ringing a bell 
 at six o'clock, I think, in the morning, and further stating that he could 
 not afford to lose his time, which he invariably did, when he was not 
 awakened by the chimes of the bell, i he idea of relying upon himself 
 to waken, does not appear to have occurred to him. 
 
 Sometimes some portentions individual will scrawl (no other word 
 expresses it), a badly spelled and worse written letter to the editor of 
 some paper, and his position, financially, will deter the editor from 
 consigning it to its proper place, the waste paper basket. The com- 
 positor and proof reader are made to suffer, while the writer is delighted 
 with his effort. If one or two such letters were published giving the 
 exact spelling a generous public would be relieved from further en- 
 croachment by such people. If this trash v^ere written years ago in an 
 age when even royal personages indulged in a phonetic style of ortho- 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. W^ 
 
 graphy which would provoke the laughter of a modern newsboy, the 
 writing and spelling might be excused. The pretender to the Crown of 
 England wrote of his father a^ Gems, and that he should murder the 
 two languages in which he wrote seems a small thing, and the fact that 
 Frederick the Great, the most accomplished of princes, bosom friend 
 of Voltaire, and sworn patron of the literati should have been unable 
 to spell is perhaps, ji matter of some surprise, hence I try to remember 
 these things when, in the capacity of proofreader it has fdllen to my 
 lot to decipher the hierogliphics sent in for publication, which it would 
 be the bitterest irony to call writing. 
 
 Personal mentions are a source of perennial at, • vation to news- 
 paper men. Every man, of course, considers hiniseil entitled to have 
 his arrival chronicled in the daily press, and some are even willing to 
 pay for it. I was amused at the disposition made of one ambitious 
 young man, who hurried into the office of one of the morning papers, 
 and handed the clerk a slip of paper with the remark : " My friends will 
 want to know I'm in the city, so you can put that in." 
 
 The clerk examined it, and handed it br.ck with the reply: 
 
 " We have nothing to do with such matters here, you will require 
 to see Mr the city editor, up-stairs." 
 
 The guest to the city hustled up-stairs, and the clerk remarked : 
 
 "Mr the city editor is home, and will not be here until this 
 
 afternoon, there is no one to take that slip of i>aper from him, and by 
 the time he gets through with trying to f- id the city editor he will 
 come to the conclusion that his friends are not so anxious to know that 
 he is here." 
 
 " Do you have many such .^ " 
 
 " Yes ; we are incessantly bored with people of that class. You 
 see in the country towns the papers are glad enough to get such items, 
 and they seem to think that the city papers are the same." As witness 
 the following : 
 
 A number of the elite from our vicinity an:l the Junction section pave a surprise to Mr, 
 and Mrs. LoLg, of Centre street, Beefon, on Wednesday evening last. — Beeton World. 
 
 Contrary to expectations Mr. Moncrieff, M.l'., for Kast Lampton, spoke in favour of the 
 remedial bill down at Ottawa on Friday . Therefore, .Mr. MoncriefTs name is pants. — Sarnia Post, 
 
 .Moise Letourneau's horse dropped dead on the road as he was coming home with a load 
 of firewood last week. An over-feed of oats is supposed to have caused death. — Comber Herald. 
 
 We noticed in the locals of last week's paper that the first crow was anxiou>-ly looked 
 for. Crows hive been around here all winter, so they are no indication of spring, — BrockvilU 
 Recorder. 
 
 Andrew Isaac is making very good fence improvements on a lot next to John Day's. Go 
 on Andrew, you are performing a good example to many young men. Success to you.— 
 Walhuchurg Ne^vs. 
 
 *To THE Editor of the IUnner. 
 
 Dear Sir, — The Leader editor at Schomberg has c rawled into his hole and pulled the 
 hole in after him, by refusing to print my letter of last week. 
 
 PRO BONO PUBLICO— Aurora Banner 
 
 A wellknown clerg/man who made periodical visits to Toronto 
 World, on his way from some meeting in connection with the church 
 to the hotel, would call on a certain newspaper and buttonhole the clerk 
 with the exoression : 
 
 % 
 
36 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 " Send a reporter down to the Walker House, to see the Rev: Dr. 
 
 Blowout, and I'll give him the particulars of a meeting of the 
 
 association, or board." 
 
 To anyone of ordinary intelligence it ought to be patent that in an 
 institution like this the clerk in the financial department would have 
 no intercourse with the editorial department. The clerk merely refer- 
 red him to that Department, stating that he never saw the reporters, 
 and could not, therefore, give them the message. 
 
 " I have nothing to do with that," the preacher answered sullenly, 
 " I leave word with you," and he looked menacingly at his auditor, 
 who replied coolly : 
 
 "All I can do is to leave a memo, in the editor's box, and if he 
 gets it all right, and if he doesn't, it isn't my fault." 
 
 If the city editor tailed to get the memorandum there is no doubt 
 the worthy preacher would have written the paper complaining of the 
 clerk in question, his look of ill-concealed anger showed it ; but it is to 
 be remembered that this man is the exception to the rule of those who 
 call to see the editor. If their business is of sufficient importance to 
 require editorial attention, their own intelligence, if they have any, will 
 teach them that the business office of a concern of that kind has some- 
 thing else to do besides acting as medium between the editorial staff 
 and some self-contained as who wants his vanity fed. 
 
 Speaking of this preacher brings to mind an incident in which a 
 model Christian showed himself in a most exemplary manner. His 
 daughter had died, and he called at one of the city newspaper offices 
 to insert the notice. It is a recognized law amongst nev.spapers that 
 no clerk is io write out an advertisement and when requested to do so, 
 the clerk in qviestion refused to break the rule. The would be advert- 
 iser flew into a passion, but finding the clerk inflexible, he finally went 
 to the customers' desk, and wrote " sweetly fell asleep in Jesus," &c., 
 at which the clerk laughed irreverently when he read it. 
 
 If the theory holds good, that he who places temptation in the way 
 of humanity is guilty equally witn him who sins, than one of the city 
 newspapers has much to answer for when they introduced a system of 
 free advertising. The temptation to tell a falsehood is so great that 
 few men and no woman can resist it when they get a free advertisament 
 in exchange therefor. 
 
 The wife of a v/ell-known clergyman, who receives a very hand- 
 some salary, called in the office for the purpose of advertising for a 
 domestic. After some preliminary skirmishing as to who should write 
 the advertisement, and the clerk having come out victorious, the lady 
 threw the advertisement on the counter and stared defiantly at him* 
 while he counted the words. 
 ' "Twenty-six cents," the clerk exclaimed cheerfully, 
 
 " But those go in free," she answered angrily. 
 
 •' Yes, twenty words one time free, but you have had this advert- 
 isement in before." 
 
 "I have no such thing." 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. at 
 
 " Have you never advertised for a domestic before ? " 
 
 •' Yes, but that's months ago." 
 
 " Well, that is of no consequence, you know. We only insert one 
 time free, so you will have to pay for this." 
 
 "Is the manager in?" she demanded suddenly. 
 
 "No," the clerk answered sweet y, "I regret to say that he isn't." 
 
 While this little fusilade had been going on, the lady had worked 
 herself into quite a frenzy, and her passion was beyond all control. 
 Her eyes fairly blazed with anger. 
 
 " Do you mean to tell mc," she demanded, in a rage, " that I am 
 to have the benefit of a free advertisement only once in every six 
 months ?" 
 
 " It isn't only once in six months, but always. One time free is 
 what we advertise, and I am obliged to observe the rule strictly." 
 
 '•Then, I suppose," she answered in a tone, nieai t to be sarcastic, 
 " if I live to be a hundred years old, I can only advertise once in your 
 free columns, according to this." 
 
 "That is practically what it amounts to." 
 
 She grabbed the inoffensive little piece of paper, and crushing it in 
 her hand, added scathingly, " I'll advertise in the Telegram where it will 
 do some good, if I have to pay," and she swept majestically out of the 
 door. 
 
 This is merely a sample of what happens every day, only perhaps 
 this is a little worse than the generality. The clerk had simply done 
 his duty, and his coolness was the result of long experience. He had 
 grown callous in dealing with such people. Charity, we are informed, 
 begins at home, and one would imagine that one of God's apointed 
 might find his valuable time profitably spent in teaching good manners 
 at that shrine where charity begins, and he would, doubtless, receive 
 the heartfelt thanks of a multitude of people even though they were 
 unable to express their thanksgiving personally. 
 
 One scheme that was worked successfully for some time was the 
 practice of sending these advertisements by post card, where they 
 escaped the vigilant eye of the teller, but a few repetitions soon settled 
 that matter, and ^he post card idea received its death blow. 1 he cler'.c 
 who checks the advei*"'sements passed a post card to the teller on which 
 was writen : 
 
 " Good general servant wanted, must be good cook ; no washing, 
 references required; apply between lO and 12 a.m., and 3 and 6 p.m., 
 
 Mrs. Black, Crawford street. 
 
 " Please insert several times." 
 
 " I think," said the checking clerk " that woman has a good nerve, 
 several times, its a wonder she didn't say fifty." 
 
 The teller looked at the card in amazement. It was like a revela- 
 tion to him. Then he deliberately tore it into pieces. . - — 
 
 " Do many of these come ? " he asked. 
 
 " Yes ; quite a few." 
 
 " I'll see that no more are inserted," and he kept his word. Post 
 
38 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 cards and letters of that nature were henceforward carefully culled out 
 and destroyed, and thus by her desire to get too much for nothing, this 
 worthy lady effectually debarred herself and others like her from get- 
 ting thereafter by stealth what they knew they could not obtain by 
 legitimate means. 
 
 Another annoyance is the telephone, which has become a perfect 
 nuisance to newspaper people. 
 
 A family living in Rosedalemadea rcgularpractice of telephoning 
 advertisements for domestics, until the accountant exasperated beyond 
 all endurance at his inability to collect the account of some thirty-six 
 cents from them effectually cut them off from further using their ad- 
 vertising columns. He had sent them post card after post card, with 
 final request in large letters emblazoned thereon, but they were imper- 
 vious to all demands, and at last their telephone messages were entirely 
 ignored. At length, however, revenge came to the long suffering 
 accountant. One of the females of the family came in to insert the old 
 advertisement in the Weekly edition. 
 
 "It's two cents a word," she informed the clerk, sharply, "and 
 there are twelve words here." 
 
 The clerk permitted a diabolical smile to pass over his face as he 
 replied : 
 
 " Two and a half cents a word in the Weekly, and there are four- 
 teen words here, thirty-five cents." 
 
 The money was paid, and the lady produced another advertisement. 
 
 "Ihis is for the daily,' she announced, "and it goes in free." 
 
 •' No," he replied icily, " it doesn't. We have an account against 
 you now for thirty-six cents for advertisements telephoned and we will 
 not put any more in free. This will cost eighteen cents. 
 
 The young woman haggled a little, and tried to get the advertise- 
 ment in free, but it wouldn't work. Finally she said : 
 
 " I didn't know that we owe anything, but anyway I'll see about 
 it, and in the meantime you can put this one in," saying which she 
 placed the advertisement on the counter and turned to walk out. 
 
 " You need not leave it," the clerk replied, " it won't be inserted 
 unless you pay for it." 
 
 Further recrimination was useless, and the young lady was obliged 
 to take the advertisement with her, while the clerk laughed softly to 
 himself After that however, the familv sent the advertisements down 
 by one of the male members thereof, who would throw it on the counter, 
 and burst out of the door, as though he were shot out of a cannon, while 
 the advertisement itself was consigned to the waste paper basket. 
 
 Another lady has a mania for having her name appear in the 
 columns of situations wanted — female, as a phiianthropist, and her 
 manner of shedding benevolence is of that delightful kind that costs 
 nothing. Ever and anon the clerk who has the misfortune to be placed 
 near the telephone is called up : — . — — - 
 
 " Is that the Mail ?" inquires a languid female voice. > 
 
 " Yes," the reply is curtly given. 
 
OF TORONTO THE ('rOOD. 39 
 
 " I want to put in an advertisement. Are you listening ? " 
 
 " Yes ; go on." 
 
 " Mrs. Cornwallis Windermere No. 3000 Algonquin street, desires 
 to recommend a clever young girl as mother's help or general servant. 
 Have you got it ? " 
 
 " Yes ; will you pay for this ? " 
 
 "Oh, they go in free. Put it in five or six times, please." 
 
 And before the clerk has time to collect himself the lady has rung 
 off, and rather than disappoint the girl who is looking for a place the 
 advertisement is inserted. Since that paper discontinued the free ad- 
 vertising, I notice this charitable lady's name never appears as it pre- 
 viously did. 
 
 I strongly recommend this style of philanthropy, particularly as it 
 is cheap and effective It lends the idea to a credulous public that you 
 are interested in the poor, and if you have a telephone it is so conve- 
 nient, and then too, it costs absolutely nothing. 
 
 One of our telephone friends was most beautifully come up to one 
 Sunday night. SpeciaLservices were being held in the Y.M.C.A. rooms, 
 and at the conclusion thereof, one of the prime movers in the affair 
 rang up the newspaper otifice. 
 
 •' Hello," he exclaimed, "Is that number ten thousand ? " 
 
 ♦' Yes. 
 
 " Well, take this advertisement." 
 
 *' Who is speaking ? " 
 
 Now it so happened that the financial office had not yet opened 
 for business on Sunday night, and the Y.M.C.A. delegate had rung up 
 the editorial department. The city editor who was a Scotchman, was 
 at the phone, and was one of those men who will allow no one to ride 
 over them. 
 
 " Never you mind who is speaking," Mr. Smart Alex, replied, 
 " You take this advertisement." 
 
 " You can go to hell with your advertisement, I won't take any of 
 your d d nonsense." 
 
 The advertisement didn't appear. 
 
 One day a young lady from a law office presented two advertise- 
 ments — one for a boy wanted, and the other for a domestic. As fate 
 would have it, the clerk had seen the advertisement for the domestic 
 in the Telegram the evening before, so he charged full price for both. 
 The young lady looked surprised but paid the amount. 
 
 A few minutes later a telephone message came, and the clerk was 
 called to the phone. It might be mentioned that the advertiser was 
 one of those Englishmen who have wood instead of brains. 
 
 " I sent an advertisement over a few minutes ago for a servant and 
 one for boy, and you charged me thirty-eight cents, now I want that 
 money refunded." 
 
 " All right," the clerk responded, "but the advertisements won't 
 go in." 
 
 "Why not.?" 
 
40 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 "They must be paid for." 
 
 " No ; they go in free." 
 
 " The advertisement for the boy is two cents a word, and the do- 
 mestic is one cent a word, altogether it comes to thirty-eight cents." 
 
 " You advertise to insert free." 
 
 "Yes; under certain conditions, but you do not come under these 
 'Conditions." 
 
 '■■ Well, I'll see about it." 
 
 Some time afterwards the collector for subscriptions called for 
 payment, and was refused the reason for refusal being that his adverti- 
 sements were not inserted, but how it came out I never heard. 
 
 Quite frequently we read notices like the following : 
 
 DIED 
 
 In this city, on the 2i;th instant, at No. 240 Piccadilly street, Charles Frederic Angustus 
 Dudley Jones, eldest son of the late Alexander Dagmar Leopold Jones, of Her Majesty's looth 
 regiment oflrish Dragoons, and the nephew of the Right Honourable, the Lord Keeper of 
 Her Majesty's stables agerl 45 years. 
 
 London, Liverpool, Manchester and New York papers please copy. 
 
 If people would for a moment reflect that all the city papers charge 
 fifty cents for inserting a death announcement, and that it is quite likely 
 others outside of the city do likewise, how absurd must it appear to 
 these papers to be called upon to insert a death notice of a person who 
 is a perfect stranger to them, and if it were at all attempted to be done 
 which in a general way it isn't, a man might be kept busy culling over 
 exchanges for this purpose alone. And yet people persist in putting 
 that meaningless phrase at the bottom of their announcements to an 
 extent that is really remarkable, though the practice of inserting these 
 notices is not carried on to any extent if at all, by the papers which 
 are called upon to do so. 
 
 The following is a rather crisp, rat trap and business like sort of a 
 
 notice : 
 
 DeBriggs — On Saturday, Dec. 8th, 1894, at his residence, 201 Bathurst street, James 
 DeTJriggs in his 72nd year. Gone home. 
 
 Funeral on Monday at 2.30 p.m. Friends please accept this intimation. 
 
 I particularly admire the way in which the public are informed he 
 has gone home. It is short and to the point. 
 
 In addition to this it will also be observed that the modern spirit 
 of ridicule has done away with those gushing names such as Queenie 
 and others equally inane as formerly, simply that fools who would have 
 called their wives or daughters by such names found they were too 
 sweet for this wicked world, and heaven intervened and took them to 
 itself 
 
 I once knew a lad whose adoring parents called him Prince, and I 
 have no doubt he feel like cursing them to their faces. He was simply 
 the butt of the whole school, who jeered at his name, and led him the 
 life of a dog. Consult any of the newspapers and see how many children 
 cf tender years who bear outrageous names are amongst the death 
 notices, and compare them with the Johns, Georges, Williams etc., who 
 live to ripe old age, and you will be surprised. A laboring grinder in 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 41 
 
 a concern where I once worked called his son Earl. The child died in 
 four days. I clipped the following from different newspaper and ask a 
 discriminating publ'c, how people, presumed to have good common 
 sense, could expect children possessed of such names to live. 
 
 Warner— Queen Victoria Lockwood (Queenie Warner), youngest 
 daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Neil Warner, born Montreal, May 24, 1892, 
 died New York, December 14, 1896. Funeral from G.T.R. depot on 
 arrival of Dalaware and Hudson trr'n from New York, Sunday, May 
 23rd, 8. 1 5 a.m. to St. George's Church, thence to Mount Royal Cemetery. 
 
 Li Hung Chang Jones is the fearsome name with which a heart- 
 less father has burdened his helpless and unoffending offspring. It is 
 pleaded that the fact that the portion of Merthyr wherein the child was 
 born on Sunday last is locally known as China, lends a certain appro- 
 priateness to the selection. But this ingenious plea ought not to be 
 admitted in justification of such an outrage. — Washington Gazette. 
 
 The Funeral of "Birdie" Bates took place yesterday afternoon 
 from East Toronto to Norway church. There was a very large attend- 
 ance of friends and relatives, among them being Aid. Russell, Messrs. 
 Blong, Morton, Mitchell, Johnston and many more. Rev. Chas. Ruttan 
 and G. L. Starr were the officiating clergy. 
 
 Chambers — At 108 McCaul street, on the 17th May, Dorathea 
 Beatrice (Queenie), youngest daughter of Rev. A. B. Chambers, aged 
 10 years. 
 
 Funeral on Tuesday, the 19th, at 2,30 p.m. 
 
 Davis— On December 14, 1896, at 17 Anderson street, Montreal, 
 of scarlet fever, Emeline (Emmy) Gladys Davis, dearly beloved and 
 eldest daughter of Horace and Lizzie Davis. Funeral private. 
 Little Emmy was our darling. 
 
 Pride of all our hearts at home; 
 But an angel came and whispered. 
 Little hmmy, do come home. 
 
 The body of Irminie Savage, who was drowned some six weeks 
 ago from a cancu in the Humber, was found Saturday and buried 
 yesterday. 
 
 Quite a large number of friends of Mr, and Mrs. Geo. B. Longley 
 attended the funeral obsequies on Sunday afternoon of their infant 
 daughter, Zenith Gertrude. Interment took place in the cemetery, 
 Rev. J. H. Ratcliffe conducting the religious services. 
 
 Elmer Graydon, living near English, Ind., has named his infant 
 son Abraham Lyncoln Ulyssess William McKinley ; and a neighbor, 
 John Vaughn, not to be outdone, has named his infant son Thomas 
 Jefferson Andrew Jackson James Monroe William Jennings Bryan. At 
 last accounts both infants were doing as well as could be expected under 
 the circumstances. 
 
 These are a very few of the difficulties of the business offices of 
 newspapers. They, like the Government, are always con«^idered fit and 
 proper subjects for plunder, and men and women do not hesitate to 
 " do " them at every opportunity. 
 
4i OF TOKONTO THK GOOD. 
 
 The subscription department have difficulties just as exasperating 
 as the advertising only they are not quite so frequent. A city paper 
 once reduced its subscription to $3.50 to clergymen, on the condition 
 that the whole amount should be paid in advance. After the first' 
 year's subscription had run out and it was pretty well run into the first 
 six months of the second, one of those who had taken advantage of the 
 special terms called to pay the subscription, and tendered $1.75 in pay- 
 ment of six months'. 
 
 " ) his must be paid yearly in advance." said the clerk. 
 
 " Oh, no.'* 
 
 " How did you pay it before ?" 
 
 "Six months, of course." 
 
 "Are you quite sure.-*" 
 
 " Certainly." 
 
 The teller knew perfectly well that the man, clergyman as he was, 
 was selling a deliberate falsehood, and he turned to the subscription 
 clerk to look the matter up. As he had surmised it had been paid for 
 the full year, and he informed the customer that such was the case. 
 The preacher was greatly incensed, naturally, at being caught in a false- 
 hood, and he paid it will a very ill grace ; still, it demonstrates that no 
 one is exempt from indulging in a little fabrication when it suits or 
 pays them to do so. 
 
 Of the management of these concerns a great deal might be written, 
 but it must be patent to all that where such immense interests are con- 
 cerned the greatest care must be exercised, and to keep the adverti'^ers 
 out who will not pay their accounts is no small matter, or insignificant 
 undertaking. When the real estate boom was on some time ago the 
 papers were flooded with advertisements of these people, and one firm 
 who ran up a bill of $138.00 were sued, when they entered the plea of 
 infancy, all being under the age of twenty-one years, and the account 
 could not, therefore, be collected. It was rather stern logic, but it was 
 very effective. 
 
 The advertising patronrge is something very large in all the dailies, 
 and a man requires all the cardinal virtues to make a successful can- 
 vasser. He must be persistent without seeming to push the man he is 
 soliciting, and may other qualifications that are too much to mention. 
 There are journals, howeve". that can almost command the patronage 
 of advertisers, thought it seems to me like a system of blackmail : I 
 once heard of a well known advertiser meeting two newspaper men, 
 when one with whom he did not advertise, chaffed him about it. 
 
 " Oh," he exclaimed with an uneasy laugh, " I'm not afraid of you." 
 
 The Telegram, which is the leading paper devoted exclusively to 
 city interests, has the largest share of condensed advertisements and 
 which must yield them an enormous revenue. Their advertising announ- 
 cements of city auction sales is another special feature. 
 
 The reporters of the city papers are as a general rule a long suffer- 
 ing class of men, and generally men of ability, but they ere frequently 
 imposed upon in their desire to do justice to the public. A gentleman 
 
OP TORONTO TilR (JOOD. 4ft 
 
 connected with one of the morninfj papers made a remark to me that 
 demonstrates their difficulties. A certain man, whose name is promin- 
 ently before the public as a somewhat ostentatious philanthropist, and 
 as bein^ connected with different charities, never allows an incident, 
 however trivial to pass without sending his office boy to the newspapers 
 with the report. " If" said my friend, "he were to give a blind man 
 ten cents, I suppose he would send his boy around with a local to each 
 of the papers, announcing the fact." In casting ashes upon his head 
 in the way of giving charity, he takes good care that the public shail 
 know what a saintly head he thinks it is, nevertheless. 
 
 During the meeting of the Church of I-ngland Woman's Auxiliary 
 Mission Board all matters of interest were freel}' supplied to the repor- 
 ters, and every efifoit made to lighten their burdens. On the other 
 hand, the Presbyterian Women's Foreign Mission Society met in the 
 Westminster church, Bloorstreet, and not only were the press excluded, 
 but the officials actually wished to be paid for furnishing the names of 
 the delegates. 1 he newspaper men promptly refused to comply with 
 this request, and it was only after they stated would not publish them 
 unless copied out and handed over that a copy was furnished one 
 paper, with the understanding that it should be used by all. 
 
 It is not always possible, of course, for either the reporter or his 
 contem[)orary, the accountant to get even with those who try to slight 
 them, but this incident will be a revelation to the committee who were 
 instrumental in bringing a certain singer to the city. The church in 
 question, at the discretion of the accountant was entitled to advertise 
 at the rate often cents a line, the regular rate being fifteen. When the 
 first advertisement appeared the acconntant submitted it to the mana- 
 ger, and asked what rate he should charge. 
 
 "Shall I make it fifteen cents, and then if they think they ought 
 to get it the old rate, I will refer them to you ? " 
 
 "Well, yes, do that. If they want it at ten cents, we will have ta 
 give it them, I suppose, still if they will pay the fifteen we may as well 
 get it." 
 
 The accountant sent a polite note asking for two passes. The 
 obliging secretary of the committee said he didn't have any, but that 
 Mr. Somebody Else, who lived the Lord Only knows where, had charge 
 of them, but he thought the}- were all gone anyway, and it was extre- 
 mely doubtful if the accountant could get any in any case. After the 
 concerts the account was sent in amounting to $45.00, being at the rate 
 of fifteen cents per line. The secretary called in a great rush, and 
 handed back the bill. 
 
 • We only pay ten cents a line." said he. 
 
 "That rate only applies to your Christmas, Good Friday and 
 Thanksgiving services." the accountant answered coolly, " when the 
 collections are for charity." ' 
 
 " But we had a lecture a couple of month ago, and you only 
 charged us ten cents." 
 
 " Yes, that was my mistake," , 
 
41 OF TORONTO TITR (JOOD. 
 
 The account was paiM at fifteen cents a line, and when the same 
 singer came afjain the same rale was charfred. II. id the courtesy of 
 two insignificant passes been extended to the applicant, the committee 
 would have been richer by $22.50 than they otlierwise were, as the 
 accountant could have referred the secretary to the manager of the 
 paper, and it could have been arranged. 
 
 1 lie modern character who rejoices to have Iiimself interviewed is 
 really the most odious that can be brought to the notice ol the reporter, 
 <iiul the prayers of the righteous tliat avail much might be offered on 
 behalf of him who is sacrificed at this alter of penance. I mentioned 
 to you the circumstance of the clergj'man who at some hole or corner 
 meeting of a committee of his church desired to have himself ii^ter- 
 viewed, and always left word at the business olfice of the paper to have 
 a reporter call to see him, recalls a character in Havvley' Smart's " At 
 Fault," every time I saw him. This was Mr. Totterdell, who was not 
 inaptly described b)' a detective, when he said with an air of patient 
 •""signation : "Now for that weai'some creature Totterdell," and again 
 when Mr. Totterdell had finis'v,'d, the detective said to liimself: 
 *• Darned old fool. He told all he knew, and wanted to tell a great deal 
 more that he didn't. What a wasteful creature of time it is." 
 
 VVe all have our crosses to bear, and if some are heavier than others, 
 and the bea'crs sink beneath, them, remember that this has been the 
 fate of humanity from time inmiemorial, but consider the trials of those 
 reporters who are compelleil to listen to such drivel as these people 
 usuall)' give them. Sjrely the Great Judge on the last day will remem- 
 ber with mercy these great afflictions, even though the reporter in 
 anguish of soul may, like the prophet, of old, cry out : " j^ow long. Oh, 
 Lord, how long ? " 
 
 I had a conversation some little time ago with the managing 
 editor of a journal which I may say parenthetically, is not published 
 in Toronto, and in the course of his remarks he dwelt upon the high 
 attainment possible to women in connection with newspaper work, and 
 mentioned the fact with evident pride, that young ladies were acting 
 as his sub-editors, and also as proofreaders. "They do the work," he 
 remarked complacently, referring to the proof-readers "just as well as 
 men." 
 
 He was undeniably correct in his assertion for as a matter of fact 
 they do better than men, in some branches. I consider myself com- 
 petent to speak with a remarkable degree of authority, and I assert that 
 there is no one more competent to throw dirt than a woman, not only 
 because it seems inherent to her nature, but because, as Balzac observes 
 even in their dissimulation there is an element of sincerity. Some eight 
 years ago Grip had on its staff", a cantankerous disappointed old 
 harridan who used to write acidulated dirt which she thought was 
 satire. 1 never saw her and do not know her name, yet the way she 
 wrote of I'rof Goldwin Smith and Lord Randolph Churchill convinced 
 me that I was correct. No one but a disappointed woman could have 
 framed such language. 
 
OF TORONTO TIIK (iOOD. 45 
 
 I subjoin the following piece of twaddle is being the work of some 
 sweet creature, and ask your consideration of the last sentence : 
 
 He knew that his visit besides gratifying a not altogether viilpr desire to see in the flesh 
 one who had so often delighted, solaced and puzzled him, would give i)leasiirc to thousands of 
 readers t.> whom Mr. Browning (our Knglish mentors insist on the " Mr,") will be a more real 
 entity from his description. l''i>r cur (nun f<iirt -w,- urc simply filled with aivy at Mr. Fitch's 
 courage and success, though we would prefer not to be scoldeil, event at a dist.»nce. 
 
 In connection with ladies in journalism, the Toronto Telegram 
 recently remarked : 
 
 Woman, lovely woman, is needed in the newspaper business to gently turn the edge of 
 editorial bitterness and 1)1 cathe her own kindly spirit into all the utterances of every wcll- 
 conilucted j urnal. Heads form theories that the feet kick holes in. I'rofcssion is formed by 
 hope, and practice l)y the force of our fallen nature. The jjrofessions of woman in journalism 
 are in kce))ing with her high and holy mission, but her practices coincid*- with in.stincts that 
 may be lofty or may be I(jw A woman who writes for a mcrning paper has just given an 
 example of the thoughtful tenderness, the sweet gentility, t'le lady-like kindness which are said 
 to be characteristic of the iiews])ai)er womnn. She visited a summer resort not far from Toronto. 
 Not on mere pleasure bent was she. Ah, no 1 Her business was Professional with a cajiital P. 
 The waiter girl displeased Her. 'I'he girl may have been tired or overworked, or perhajjs she 
 neglected the august visitor to attend the guests who were less obviously superior. A news- 
 paper man would have prubably had lact enough to get good service from the waiter. At all 
 events he wonkl no* have avanged his wrongs in print, but not so the news])apcr woman. That 
 unfortunate waiter girl was pilloried in the woman's column. Ih:r personal appearance «a.* 
 referred to in terms that would be offensive even if the newspap<?r deity whom she had offended 
 was a .Mrs, 1-angtiy. An incident like this, trifling as it may lie, is evidence that women can 
 be mean upon jtrovocation that would not stir a man. Individual character determines the 
 quality oi woman's influence in journalism, in ])olitics oi in anything else. If the individual be 
 ncble the influence will be good ; if the individual be otherwi.se the influence will be ordinary. 
 
 Personally, I consider the Evening Telegram the best paper in 
 Canada. Mr. Robertson has been successf'il in having associated 
 with him a staff" of writers and reporters who are able to keep in touch 
 with public sentiment. It was the Telegram that broke up the cedar- 
 block paving ling, and successfully conducted a libel suit for doing so. 
 It was the Telegram that pointed out to the Ontario Government that 
 the late Mr. Badgerow was no fit successor to Mr. Fenton as Crown 
 Attorney. It did so kindly, but eff'ectually, and a man of ability was 
 placed in that position. It pointed out that there should be a City 
 Crown Attorney and a County C rown Attorney for Toronto and York 
 County and this was done. Just before the general elections in 
 Ontario which it was presumed would be held in September, the Tel- 
 egram pointed out why it would be better to hold them in June, and 
 three days afterwards the House was dissolved and an appeal made in 
 June, the Liberals again returned to power. The Telegram made a 
 forecast of how the new house would stand, and was out in one case 
 only. The Pdrliamentary correspondent of the Telegram at Ottawa, 
 from 1891 to 1896 was in my estimation, the best corsespondent in the 
 press gallery, barring none. His articles were the most readable 
 published in Canada. I could go on enumerating reasons for my opinion 
 without number, but anyone reading that journal will know that what 
 I say is perfectly true, and patent to anyone. 
 
 The Mail and Empire devoted a couple of columns daily to " For 
 and about Women," and I give you the following item clipped from 
 these columns : . 
 
46 OP TOEOXTO THE GOOD. 
 
 When the tall brunette anc' the little blonde got on the car at the corner of Yonge and 
 <Jueen streets it was already <rowded. A number of m»n were hanging on to the straps. 
 There was only one seated, a young man, at that, faultlessly dressed even to a silk hat, and 
 wearing on his doll like face an expression born of ennui and satiety. He did not offer either 
 of the girls his seat. The tall brunette bent down and whispered in the ear of the little blonde, 
 " Follow my lead." The little one nodded her head knowingly. Then the tall brunette said 
 in a voice expressive of intense sur)irise, and just loud enough to be heard all over the car, 
 " Why, there's a man sitting down : " 
 
 " Where ? " said the little blonde excitedly. " Let me see him." 
 
 The tall brunette pointed him oui calmly and deliberately. 
 
 " ( )h," said the little blonde in a disnjjpointed tone, " That's not a man." 
 
 " No .' " ijucried the tall brunette. 
 
 " iVo " cotKinucd the little blonde with rising inflection, " that's a street car hog." 
 
 There was five seconds of deadly silence, during which the little blonde blushed furiously, 
 while the tall brunette set her teeth and gazed out of the window with a dreamy look in her 
 <?yes. Then came a roar of laughter from the standing men, and a choru.s of giggles from the 
 ladies who were seated. The hog, white and trembling, rose hastily pulled the bell rope, stopped 
 the car and got off. The tall brunette insisted on her companion taking the vacant seat. As the 
 little blonde settled herself she remarked placidly, " Ht s cured." 
 
 " I don't care for pork in .any shape," answered the other dreamily. 
 
 Isn't the above story just like the vv^ail of some disappointed old 
 maid .-' Jealous of the " dolMike face" which was, at least, the symbol 
 of youth, and that her own was getting scraggy and lean, and viuegar- 
 like in its expression. As long as the woman journalist confines her- 
 self to descriptions of sleeves and flounces and subjects equally inane, 
 she will be all right, but when it comes to a discussion of other subjects, 
 she cannot discuss on their merits — she is sure to show her vindictive 
 nature. In the above story, she proves my assertion. Girls or young 
 ladies who possess the faintest conception of lady like deportment do 
 not make exhibitions of themselves as the tall brunette and little blonde 
 did. However, I think I may say with truth equal to that of the writer 
 of the above story, that I was on the street car she speaks of, only she 
 does not give a correct description of the episode. When the little 
 blonde with a rising inflection, screeched, " that's a street car hog," the 
 crowd roared, but the ladies did not giggle. The idea at once prevailed 
 that these two persons were of light character — no other conclusion 
 could have been reached after Iiearing their remarks, and observing 
 their conduct, as ladies do not pass .such observations. The " hog " did 
 not leave the car either ; he simply ignored these persons, but when at 
 the corner of McCaul street a lady carrying a huge basket did enter 
 the car, the hog arose and tendered her his seat. Does not the tenor 
 of the Mail's article suggest that its writer must h^ve had some such 
 experience herself and the seat she had coveted, had been given to a 
 lady .? Men have some discretion in these things you know, and any 
 man prefers giving his seat to a young and pretty girl, or a lady, rather 
 to any coarse-minded young person who would make herself conspi- 
 cuous by her vulgarity and ill-breeding, or one whose acidulated face 
 woi'ld stop a clock. 
 
 There is one branch of the editorial department, however, that 
 will be appreciated, and that is the lot of the book reviewer. The time 
 was when the editor would conscientiously run through the volume 
 submitted to him, and give a fair criticism of the work, but that is 
 now rendered unnecessary by the publishers who send along with the 
 copy of the work, a eulogy composed by themselves. 
 
' OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 4t . 
 
 Of the many novels published a large number of them are doubt- 
 less meritorious, and possess a degree of originality that is sufficient to 
 satisfy any reader who merely wishes to be amused. Writers like Hawley 
 Stuart, Bertha M. Clay, May Agnes Fleming, Miss Braddon, E. Gabo- 
 riau, W. E. Norris and some few others can probably boast the largest 
 number of readers, in as much as they A^rite on subjects that are of 
 possible occurrence, and the narrr.tives are natural and not overdrawn, 
 but how such writers as Rev E. P. Roe, Maxwell Grey Grant Allan 
 and a few others of similar ilk ever secured publishers is a mystery to 
 me, unless the publishers were desirous of circulating school- boy com- 
 positions. If you will take any of E. P. Roe's works you will see a 
 painful effort to fill up paper, and the peremptory manner in which he 
 deals out hell to those of his characters he makes opposed to his dish- 
 water heroines or heroes, seems to me more like the desired spite of " 
 some acidulated old maid than the possibility of its being a truthful 
 presumption of what might have happened. Besides this particular 
 feature there are the glaring inconsistencies of his characters, and his 
 efforts at portraying fashionable life make me laugh. They are what 
 one might hear in a laundry. His title of Rev. has been the philoso- 
 pher's stone that has won an audience for his books, and in his case as 
 in many another, the priestly cloak has served a baser purpose than it 
 was ever intended. People of a goody-goody class who are too squea- 
 mish to read a novel by the illustrious Gaboriau, find no scruple in 
 reading of a seduction or two or a life of shame by Rev. E. P. Roe, 
 although they lose in elegance of composition by giving him the 
 preference. 
 
 A writer who has very successfully disposed of her books, is Augusta 
 J. Evans Wilson, though I am free to confess my ability to understand 
 why, except it be that her readers flatter themselves they can under- 
 stand the pedantic phrases she uses, which, after all, could be accom- 
 plished by anyone who possesses a good dictionary. I should be sorry 
 to suggest that Mrs Wilson was an inmate of an insane asylum, but 
 the only woman I ever heard use the stilted language such as she puts 
 into the mouth of her characters, was an incurable lunatic, who claimed 
 to be a daught;er of Queen Victoria. 
 
 A young miss is in penitentiary for a crime she never committed, 
 and having just learned of her mother's death, replies to her comforter 
 in the following language : 
 
 Invest no hope for my future ; for escape is as impossible for me as for that innocent 
 
 victim fore-ordained to entangle itself in the ticket on Mount Moriah. He could have fled from 
 
 the sacrificial fire and from Abraham's uplifted knife, back to dewy-green pastures, poppystar- 
 
 red, back to some cool dell where Syrian oleanders flushed the shade as easily as I can defy 
 
 • these wails, escape my lawful doom ; loosen the chain of fate. 
 
 The above may be very flowery, but I think the average reader 
 will agree that if anyone were to address you or me in that style, even 
 though her mother were dead, I think we would come to the logical 
 conclusion that it was not the penitentiary where that person should 
 be, but the asylum. I heard some school boys discussing her works once, 
 and one had, I think, struck the nail squarely on the head, when in a / 
 
48 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 tone of derision he said, " The characters in all her books talk like a 
 lot of d...d fools." 
 
 I observed an advertisement a while ago calling attention to a 
 new novel by Maxwell Grey, and commenting upon that writer's ability. 
 I never read but one of that illustrious writer's works thank heaven, 
 and while the work itself contained nothing of an original nature that 
 was even fairly meritorious, it seemed to me that the whole concern 
 was a wholesale larceny from George Elliot's " Mill on the Flos," and 
 the balance that might be possibly original was about as bad a conglo- 
 meration of trash as could well have been collected. 
 
 People of the present day are essentially independent in thought, 
 and usually take a criticism for what it is worth, and there is little 
 stock taken in such writers as Dr. Johnson and men of his ilk. We read 
 of how he seemed to consider himself the mentor of men, who probably 
 knew just as much as he did, and who accepted his snarls and regarded 
 them IL3 the outcome of a giant intellect. 
 
 It is well for him that the worthy doctor did not live in this age 
 of grace, as he would have li v'id many a long day before he would have 
 found a Boswell to put up with his peevish nonsense. It is not likely 
 indeed that he would have had more than one opportunity of reviling 
 men of this age as fools and blockheads, and contradicting them in 
 defiance of all rules of good breeding. Having done that once, the 
 handsome pair of black eyes, or broken mouth he would have received 
 would have taught him a lesson for the rest of his life. 
 
 Mrs. Southworth is another whose giant intellect has produced 
 some singular trash. I think it is extremely amusing to read of the 
 true lady and "perfect gentlemen" characters of some of the modern 
 works of fiction. In one of Mrs. Southworth's works she endeavours 
 to describe the character of one of her " true ladies," but gives herself 
 or the young lady away when the latter twitts an enemy with the 
 remark " I leave that for the painter's daughter to do," in order to 
 remind the painter's daughter of her humble origin, and there are any 
 number of writers whose inconsistencies are just as glaring. Judging 
 her by her woiks, I do not think she mingled with either ladies or 
 gentlemen, or she would have been able to give a better delineation of 
 how they conduct themselves, or had a better idea of what is considered 
 good form. 
 
 To-day we would scarcely read the works that once held away and 
 were regarded as highest class literature. The sleepy essays of Elia, 
 by Charles Lamb would not pay to publish, the reading public — and it 
 is they who are to be consulted — would hardly condescend to read 
 them, let alone to pay for them, and many others would receive the» 
 same reception. No doubt this is very fdvolous on the part of the 
 present generation, but it is none the less true. That ideal gentleman 
 whose unimpeachable honour and immaculate integrity are regarded 
 as pleasant creations of a writer's imaginal ion, is now a thing of the 
 past, or it might be called an exploded doctrine of the past, as no one 
 believed that such men exist now, or ever did exist, because, having , 
 
OF TOHONTO THE GOOD. 49 
 
 no such characters nowadays, we don't bel icve that past generation- 
 were any better than we, or if they were, they must have had a woes 
 fully dull and slow time of it, and history does not give us to under- 
 stand that they had a particularly unpleasant life as far as it treats 
 upon the subject. 
 
 If I am wrong, and I do not believe that I am, let me point to the 
 fact that such works as Albert Ross' "Thou shalt not" "Why I'm 
 Single," etc., are more widely circulated than those " with a moral," 
 notwithstanding the fact that his works are two and a half times the 
 price of these others ; as well as to the enormous circulation given to 
 the Kreutzer Sonata as soon as Postmaster General Wannamaker of 
 the United States decided to proscribe it, and of all works of fiction 
 having similar characteristics, then our moral depravity must be very 
 great, or else, as I believe, our intelligence is so much greater than our 
 ancestors. The inane Sunday school trash, and all works of heroics 
 are so wide apart from the truth and from society as we find it, that 
 -anyone reading them comes to the conclusion that the writers are 
 simply a species of ^ss, and when works like Balzac's, Ross', Tolstoi's 
 and others of that class are placed upon the market, they attain a large 
 circulation simply because of their probability, naturalness and being in 
 accordance with what we find in every day life. 
 
 A copy of a work called Madeline was placed in my hands a short 
 time ago, and I was introduced to one of those sweet, unsophisticated 
 maidens, whose sublime innocence is really comical, that is if you have 
 a keen enjoyment of the abs-ird. That such a character ever existed, 
 I do not believe, that she lived in the present generation is absolutely 
 preposterous. I admit that there are women who have lived possessed 
 of innocent faces, but the apparent innocence and artlessness generally 
 are screen for the parched and hollow souls of the woman of the world, 
 who knows how to look after her interests and tell her woes to the 
 person where it will do the most good, but in a manner to childlike and 
 bland that the majority of men are likely to be duped by it. When 
 innocence like this can be found it is time that the portals of heaven 
 should open, for the millenium has been reached. It is noticeable, I 
 think, that characters of this class arc falling into decay or disuse. Men 
 and boys who read novels wish to have something they can understand, 
 and as this is a character never to be met with, they very properly have 
 consigned it to unutterable hence. 
 
 In my estimation the ablest novel writer in the English language 
 is Miss M. E. Braddon. The charm of her writing consists to a very 
 great degree in the fact that she knows what she is writing about. If 
 she is describing fashionable life, "he handles her subject in such a 
 munner that the reader knows that she is writing from what she knows. 
 If the other side of the picture is presented, it is drawn with equal 
 vividness, showing that she has studied it, and knows it. You read of 
 almost any writer of the Southworth, Roe, and even the pedantic 
 Augusta J. Evans Wilson class, and you are at once convinced that 
 these people never knew the usages or characteristics of polite society 
 
50 OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 or aristocratic society, but lend the idea that their knowledge is some- 
 thing like the negro washerwoman, who tries to emulate the language 
 and manners of the people for whom she has been washing, and whom 
 she has probably seen only a few times, and heard speak the same 
 number of times. Or like the female contributor of a Parisian fashion- 
 able journal, who stood on the pavement and watched the ladies step 
 from their carriages to the house of some grand dame who was giving 
 an entertainment, and wrote of them as though she had been one of the 
 guests. The man or woman who has not read Miss Braddon's works 
 has missed a treat that I would be only too glad to have to indulge in 
 again. As a matter of fact 1 have read her books over three or four 
 times each. It is also true with regard to American detective stories. 
 There does not appear to be one writer of these stories who is compe- 
 tent to give a story or good society. I have purchased the works of 
 nearly all of them, and consider myself as having been done. I could 
 buy them cheaper. In some cases I paid as high as 30 cents for detective 
 stories, and have kicked myself for having been roped in. I could have 
 bought just as good in the Old Cap Collier series for five cents apiece. 
 
 THE WEEKLIES. 
 
 These are innumerable and comprise every field of labour and 
 financial enterprise, as well as every mercantile pursuit, and some of 
 them one would think, might very consistently ask themselves what 
 they are published for. But it is to be remembered that it is a very 
 simple matter to publish one of these papers. A large office such as 
 Jis. Murray & Co's. publish several of these papers, and consequently 
 it is not the gigiantic undertaking one might first imagine. 
 
 THE RELIGIOUS PRESS. 
 
 This class of literature is scarcely of sufficient importance to war- 
 rant more than a passing remark. Very few of these papers, if any, 
 are edited with more than average ability, and anyone who has seen 
 one has seen them all. They are devoted to news of church openings, 
 written on post cards (as I have seen them), biographical sketches of 
 the deceased subscribers, and editorial notes culled from other papers 
 that are well edited, though I believe they are considered good advert- 
 ising mediums. The faithful, however are not, it would seem, to be 
 permitted to enjoy the old-time privilege of being glorified by an 
 obituary in one of these paper, at least, as witness the following from 
 the Telegram : 
 
 THE OLD TIME OBITUARY. 
 
 Occasionally obituaries printed for the Christian Guardian have been clumsily written. 
 The writers who were enumerating the virtues of their religious deeds wandered over wide 
 tracts of thought, and, when almost swamped in words, sometimes came out at the right end 
 with the help of an apt quotation from the poets. The sins of the old time obituary were all 
 sins on the side of the picturesque. The obituaries built under the new rules lose the vivid, 
 fresh earnestness of the old dogies without any compensating gain of sincerity. The idea 
 underlying the old obituary was that the life recalled in its phrases had soms deep, spiritual 
 importance. The new »tyle obituary honours the life and mourns the death, of a good Methodist 
 
. OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 51 
 
 in prose as cold and unenthusiastic as that in which the church paper announces a quarterly 
 meeting or reports a tea meeting. The picturesque, sometimes (absurd, but usually earnest, 
 obituary h»d to go along with many oddities which were esteemed in the past, but the degener- 
 ation of such a quaint feature of religious journalism is worth a passing notice. 
 
 Methodists who die and leave no friends to forward the obituary notice to the office of 
 publication within so many days can go down to the grave " unwept, unhonoured and unsung," 
 as far as the Christian Guardian is concerned. A time limit is a novelty on an obituary page. 
 Delay does not impair the value of the lesson which the life and death of a good man can teach, 
 nor can the prompt publication of the obituary notice give value to a life and death which teach 
 no lessons. 
 
 THE STOCK EXCHANGE. 
 
 There are few people who read the daily papers, who are not familiar 
 with the reports of the stock exchange — an institution that regulates 
 the prices of the securities we hold or would like to hold, and which 
 sends the values thereof up and down at its own sweet will. 
 
 Buying and selling stocks on margin is a somewhat mysterious set 
 of phrases to the uninitiated and I would suggest to those who have 
 never dabbled, not to find out by their own experience, as one of those 
 who compose the class of people who think they are going to make 
 money by speculating in stocks, I can testify that you will wish you 
 had taken my advice after a few ventures in this arena of finance. You 
 will find brokers are ready to advise you in a stock in which you think 
 there is money to be made, and the probabilities are that he will have 
 some of the shares himself to dispose of. 
 
 In November, 1890, I was interested in Bank of Montreal, which 
 had been borne down to 216, and it was running up again with a 
 bound, having reached 225 bid in the course of a few days. I asked a 
 firm of brokers their opinion. 
 
 " The idea prevails that it will go higher ; the bears have had 
 their innings, and run it down to '16, now the bulls are having their 
 tumj and they are going to pinch them as much as they can, just as 
 long as any of them are short." 
 
 " Uo you think it could be purchased at 225 ? " 
 " I doubt it ; 226 was bid in Montreal last night, and they are 
 promising to run it up to 230. You see there has not been a transac- 
 tion at all, although the stock has gained ten points within the last 
 three days." 
 
 You will observe, therefore, that the stock was not by any means 
 worth the market price, but it was run up by the bulls simply to pinch 
 the shorts, and that as soon as the latter had covered, the stock would 
 have lost its fictitious value. 
 
 The shorts are they who agree to furnish you with stock at a 
 certain price in a stated time, they take the chances of its going up or 
 down — if it goes past the price agreed upon, they deliver the stock at 
 this price or pay you the difference between its present worth, and the 
 price you contracted to pay, if on the other hand it declines in value 
 the order is reversed. 
 
 To finish my story anent the Bank of Montreal, I gave the order 
 to buy, the broker very considerately informing me that he thought I 
 could get the quantity I wanted — five shares — at 226. The next 
 
62 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 morning Bank of Montreal made a sudden break in Montreal and in 
 sympathy it declined here as well. By " a master effort " my friend 
 secured me the five shares at 226, which was the only tra isaction at 
 that figure, the other sales being at 225, 224^, and on the afternoon 
 board it could be bought for 222^, so you see my assumption that the 
 firm had some some shares themselves was, I think, really quite logical. 
 So it goes. Take the advice of one of the bitten, and eschew all gam- 
 bling in stocks. 
 
 Take my case with the Bank of Montreal : 
 
 5 shares at 226 $2260.00 
 
 Brokerage 2.50 
 
 $2262.50 
 On this I must put up a margin of $100.00, to protect the broker 
 against loss, and he borrows from some Loan Company the balance of 
 $2162.50, hypothecating the shares as security for the loan, upon which 
 I am to pay interest at current rates. After holding the stock some three 
 months, I come to the conclusion that there is no probability of its 
 increasing in value and I sell at 224. The transaction is as follows : 
 
 5 shares at 224 $2240.00 
 
 Brokerage 2,50 
 
 $2237.50 
 
 3 months interest on $2162.50 at 6% 32.44 
 
 Net proceeds 2205.06 
 
 First cost 2262.50 
 
 $ 57.44 
 Amount deposited on margin 100.00 
 
 Amount I received after sale $ 42.56 
 
 So you see for my experience I paid $57.44, which, though not 
 large, was sufficient, or ought to be sufficient to keep me from having 
 my fingers burned again. 
 
 Some years ago we had what were called bucket shops, that is no 
 shares were purchased or sold. You put up your margin, and were 
 treated in every respect just the same as though the purchase was bona 
 fide, you paid interest, brokerage, etc., and if the article you were inter- 
 ested in went up you received the difference between the price you 
 bought at and sold at after deducting these little expenses. 
 
 I mean to say that you received this money sometimes — if your 
 bucket-shop keeper had it to give you, and this sometimes became a 
 very important question, for if you did not lose by an adverse market 
 you stood to do so by the unreliability of the broker, whom after suing, 
 you found to be utterly worthless and with no chattel to levy upon. 
 
 This bucket shop business became such a crying evil that 
 the Hon. J. J. C. Abbott, the late Premier framed an Act which was 
 passed prohibiting them altogether. For a time this had the desired 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. Ǥ 
 
 effect, and the country was free from the unmitigated curse, but now a 
 new phase of the old system presents itself, and insted of having the 
 principals here in our own country, we have only the agents, who 
 correspond with headquarters in Chicago or New York, and who are 
 merely commission men. 
 
 The Telegram in speaking on the subject says : 
 
 ROOT OUT THE EVIL. 
 
 Toronto's rigliteousness is quick to rise in arms against sentimental evils, and /ct it 
 ignores the existence of so-called brokers' offices thai have made thieves of trusted emplayees 
 in other cities, and will do the same here. Either Premier Abbott ought to be ashamed of the 
 Act which is unappropriately labelled " a measure for suppression of bucket shops," or County 
 Crown Attorney Curry and the police authorities ought to be ashamed of their failure to use the 
 sword which the Dominion statutes gave them. This whole bucket shop business is bad. A 
 well-conducted poker game is a respectable and cheap method of losing money compared to 
 sport which is dignified with the name of legitimate speculation. There is nothing legitimate 
 about the business. All the needs of the legitimate grain business are served through the Board 
 of Trade. Outside of that the traffic is simply gambling, for the dupes do not buy grain, but 
 drop into the spider's parlour to lose their money on the chance of a jump in the price of wheat 
 or pork. Often as much as $160,000.00 is telegraphed from a single bucket shop in Toronto 
 to one central operator in the grain gambling business at Chicago. More than one million 
 dollars of good Toronto money has been rhrown in upon the wrong side of wheat margins 
 within the last month. Labelling a bucket shop with the title of commission office does not 
 change the nature of business. It is a cold swindle from start to finish. It deprives legitimate 
 investments of the money which they need and turns the heads of silly boys and sillier old men 
 by tempting them with alleged chances of sudden wealth. 
 
 Another time I was interested in Bank of Montreal, a second 
 time, and after the market going against me for some time, I, in des- 
 pair placed a limit of 222^ to sell at, and after some little time the 
 market began to show signs of advancing. Inadvertently I did not 
 advise the broker to cancel the order to sell at that figure, and notwith- 
 standing the fact that the market was very strong with a decided up- 
 ward tendency, he managed to sell for 2235^, although the quotation 
 following that was 225, and finally the stock rose to 230. I called his 
 attention to this matter and expres.sed regret that he had sold, but he 
 replied that if he had not done so he could have been held liable for it 
 if the stock had by any chance gone down below my limit. So far so 
 good. Five months later I was interested in London and Canadian, 
 and I telegraphed an order to sell it at the market price, which was 
 137 bid and 138^^ asked. But he did not sell. A day or so after- 
 wards he stated that he would sell when he thought it best in my inter- 
 est to do so. Unfortunately I was in need of money at the time, and 
 I confirmed this gross piece of negligence or design on his part, and I 
 was compelled to sell at a very great sacrifice to myself, but he never 
 stated that he was liable for this negligence on his part. If you will 
 take my advice and be guided by my experience have nothing to do 
 with the stock exchange, or at least that part of it which deals in 
 margins. You will be nipped as sure as your name is what it is, if I 
 am any judge of the matter, and 1 regret to say that I am. 
 
 The stock exchange itself is situated on King street east on the 
 corner of the recent extension of Victoria street, and was incorporated 
 in 1878. There are two meetings daily except Saturday at 12.30 and 
 3.10. Each broker has a seat and outsiders are not admitted to the 
 
54* OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 i 
 
 Board, but anyone may communicate with a member by handing his 
 card to the doorkeeper who will at once call out the gentlemen. Persons 
 wishing to become members are required to make their applications at 
 certain times, which is publicly announced, and if anyone can bring and 
 sustain an accusation affecting the integrity of the applicant he is not 
 admitted. Some time ago, I believe, seats were worth $3,500.00 to 
 $4,500.00, but one was sold some little time ago for something like six 
 hundred, I think, demonstrating that the privilege is not so valuable as 
 it used to be. 
 
 People desiring to invest their money will find that Toronto as a 
 financial centre has few equals on the American continent. Her bank- 
 ing facilities are large, few communities being more highly favoured in 
 this respect. The history of the loan and investment companies forms 
 an interesting study, and the fidelity and care with which they are 
 managed make them together a standing evidence of the honesty and 
 trutworthiness of Canadian officials. The development and growth of 
 the city and surrounding country are due to the resources which are 
 placed at our command through these financial institutions. 
 
 Canadian banks are of a large capital and the different institutions 
 have agencies here and there in the most profitable districts of the 
 country. Out of a total of 38 banks doing business in Canada under 
 Dominion Government charter no less than 14 of these have agencies 
 here, and Toronto is the headquarters of seven. The paid-up capital 
 of the fourteen banks having agencies here amounts to nearly $50,000,- 
 000 while the total paid-up capital of the banks doing business in 
 Canada is nearly $70,000,000. l he total deposits of all the chartered 
 banks in the Dominion amount to about $220,000,000. 
 
 FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES. 
 
 "When I think," said Coleridge, "that every morning, in Paris 
 alone, thirty thousand fellows wake up, and rise with the fixed and 
 settled purpose of appropriating other people's money, it is with renewed 
 wonder that every night when I reach home, I find my purse still in 
 my pocket." 
 
 And yet it is not those who simply aim to steal your purse who 
 arc either the most dishonest or the most formidable. To stand at the 
 corner of some dark street, and rush upon the first person who comes 
 along, demanding "your money or' your life" is but a poor business, 
 devoid of all prestige, and long since given up by chivalrous natures. 
 A man must be something more than an idiot to still ply his trade on 
 the high roads, exposed to all sorts of ahnoyances on the part of the 
 police, when financial enterprises offer such a magnificently fertile field 
 to the activity of imaginative people. And in order to understand the 
 mode of proceeding in this particular field it is sufficient to read the 
 glaring prospectuses of some of the concerns whose histories are given 
 below. , .^ 
 
 In Canada we are not as expert as our neighbours nor the Pari- 
 sians to be sure, but we have had our Central Bank case, and it proves 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 55 
 
 that we are making progress, though it may be perhaps a matter of 
 regret that a larger number did not share the spoils. One man was 
 stated to have had one of his cheques in the hands of the teller for seven 
 hundred and fifty thousand dollars, and it was counted as cash. " What 
 sublime confidence," thought, not without a feeling of envy more than 
 one man, who for merely one tenth of that amount would gladly have 
 become a citizen of the United States. Although such large adventures 
 were somewhat rare, injthe present instance the magnitude of the amount 
 more than made up for the vulgarity of the act. 
 
 In that same Central Bank case, it will be remembered that one 
 firm was given a line of credit largely on account of their possible 
 influence on the stock market, and if this credit were not given the 
 stock of the bank might suffers at the hands of this firm who could 
 possibly "bear" it, and when the names o^ some of the Bank's debtors 
 were given, business men must have smiled to themselves at the gulli- 
 bility of the pianager who gave them credit. Emulation of these men 
 will be found to be much wiser than to engage in plundering at the 
 point of a pistol. The Criminal Code does not appear to reach such 
 cases, and the man who can " do " you is almost safe from molestation. 
 Who then would be like the ragged little newsboy, modest as his crime 
 is who steals a loaf of bread to keep from starvation, or steals a pair of 
 shoes to keep his feet warm, when so much more brilliant fortunes can 
 be made from engineering financial institutions. 
 
 Man's inhumanity to man is not more strikingly exemplified than 
 in the large number of schemes introduced to make money out of the 
 credulous. Given a kind of insurance scheme, and an agent approaches 
 you with the argument that a large number of those who become mem- 
 bers are sure to drep out, and that is where the stock insurance companies 
 make their money. Let us take for example the Alliance Bond and 
 Investment Company, an institution whose name would seern to carry 
 the weight with it that strong financial standing should do. 
 
 The following somewhat seductive advertisement appeared in a 
 large number of papers in the city, and the city directory : 
 
 The Alliance Bond & Investment Co. 
 
 INCORPORA.TED FEBRUARY 27th, 1890. 
 
 Capital, $1,000,000. Subscribed, $^00,000. 
 
 General OffiGes-27 & 29 Wellington St. E., Toronto 
 
 PRESIDENT— VV. Stone Toronto. 
 VI ':E-PRESIDENT— James Swifp, Kingston ; T. K. Holmes, MD., Chatham. 
 
 CASHIER>-Henry Vigeon. 
 SOLICITORS— Mcpherson, Clark & Jarvis, Toronto. 
 
 The Company issue Bonds guaranteed to the face value. These Bonds are for amounts 
 from ^100, and can be bought for any numbers of years from five upwards. 
 
66 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 These Bonds are payable by instalments, and the investor obtains guaranteed compound 
 interest, at the rate of 4 per cent, per annum, and are especially protected by a sinking fund 
 invested in first-class Real Estate Mortgages. 
 
 This Company is empowered by its Charter to act as Administrators, Receivers, Trustees, 
 Assignees, I.iquidalors and Agents, under aiipointtnent by the Court or Individuals. Having 
 special facilities for the windiing up of estates, the Assignee braneh of its business is solicitetl. 
 
 Heing a responsible Financial Company, Creditors can depend on prompt settlements 
 an'l quick winding up of any estates they may entrust to the Company. 
 
 Tho AUianco Bond and Investment Company, of Ontario, Ltd. 
 Assignees, Administrators and Financial Agents. 
 
 27 & 29 WELLINGTON STREET EAST, TORONTO. 
 
 The company in question was a joint stock affair incorporated 
 with a capital stock of $1,000,000, of which it was stated that over 
 $500,000 had been subscribed. A call of fxve per cent, was issued in 
 the first instance, and a second call had been sent out. The Company 
 occupied magnificent offices in the Bradstreet building at 29 Well- 
 ington street east. The walls were ornate with costly engravings and 
 paintings, rich carpets covered the floor, the furniture was superb ; in 
 point of fact the two flats occupied by the company were fitted out in 
 Oriental fashion. The business consisted in .selling bonds on the instal- 
 ment plan, a class of investments which has not proved itself to be 
 excessively popular with the people. At the outset the Col. Potter, of 
 New York, was the manager of the concern. In salaries the Board was 
 generous, Potter received $5,000 a year, Mr. Sparling, the superinten- 
 dent $2,000, and the president, $1,500. 
 
 Potter came from New York, and was formerly manager of the 
 Mutual Reserve in that city. He brought letters of introduction and 
 played the Masonic racket for all it was worth. Some were caught, 
 others were warned by the articles in the Telegram and escaped. The 
 feeling was very bitter that New Yorkers would have given letters to 
 Potter thus inducing innocent people to invest. Potter endeavoured 
 ty capture Hon. G. M. Gibbon with a salary of $9,000 a year, but he 
 was warned by the Telegram and kept out. 
 
 The Boston News Bureau has been showing up these bond com- 
 companies in the United States and has this to say of them : 
 
 Everybody knows that an insidious form of gambling has been 
 creeping into the wage earning community the last two months under 
 the guise of so-called " investment bond " companies, based largely upon 
 the principle of Mrs. Howe's bank, which could continue to pay large 
 returns so long as deposits increased — in fact security is exactly as in 
 Mrs. Howe's bank, and Mrs. Howe went to prison — not the deposit of 
 the depositer but the deposit of the next depositor. But it has not been 
 generally understood that this form of " enterprise " is rapidly increasing 
 and is beginning to affect the ordinary channels of investment. 
 
 The scheiTies of the investment companies vary in details, but all 
 have these features in common— a promise to pay a round sum of monej*^ 
 in return for immediate payment, and regular periodical assessments. 
 The bonds or certificates, often in engraved form, with gold seals are 
 to be paid in numerical order, beginning with the first issued, and each 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 57 
 
 bond is said to mature and become payable, when all bearing lower 
 numbers have been cancelled or paid and "there is sufficient money in 
 the treasury." Any failure on the part of a bondholder to pay the 
 assessment when due forfeits to the comp' ;iy all previous payments. 
 
 Thirty-five of the sixty-five investment companies whose prospect- 
 uses the News Bureau obtained issue straight $ioo bonds, three issue 
 $500 pieces, three issue $1000 pieces, two issue $50 bonds, three issue 
 $35, $75 and $200 respectively, and seventeen give their customers a 
 variety ranging from $25 to $2,000. The average cost for the first pay- 
 ment, including one month's assessment is about $7. and if $500,000 is 
 a fair estimate of business done so far the face of the liabilities assumed 
 already is about $18,620,000. That is to say before the last man who 
 has invested in these schemes to-day shall realize his hopes the class of 
 people v/ho fancy their "investments" vill have to contribute over and 
 above all expenses over $18,000,000. Should this $18,000,000 ever 
 be contributed the face of the liabilities then outstanding will be $2,- 
 268,000,000, or more money than there is in the United States. If 20 
 per cent, of the money, and that is the usually stated estimate for ex- 
 penses, sticks to the fingers of the projectors as it passes throught their 
 hands, they will be rich beyond the dreams of avarice. 
 
 The recent prominence given to the Dominion Building and Loan 
 Association by reason of the pending dispute between the directors and 
 shareholders of the concern, has attracted a good deal of attention to 
 its method of doing business. The Society is constructed on the eight- 
 year endowment principle and one correspondent who encloses a literal 
 copy of the membership agreement writes: "By this document it appears 
 that the shareholder is promised six per cent..., on his $50 for eight 
 years, which amounts to $24. At the end of the eight years he is to 
 receive $ioo, making $134 received in all. That is to say he is promised 
 his own $50 back with an addition of $74, which amounts to a return 
 on the investment and all but 18 1/^ per cent, per annum in addition. If 
 the sum returned were $75 instead of $74, the return would be exactly 
 i8}4 per cent. Now why does the Dominion Building and Loan 
 Association sell for $50 an article which if ofi"ered to any one of a dozen 
 of our large financial institutions would be snapped up at even a higher 
 price than $81.15 •'' Why does the Dominion Building and Loan offer 
 to pay or have to pay so much for accommodation or for funds for in- 
 vestments which comes to the same thing. And what upon earth or 
 under it is the nature of the financial business that can afford to pay the 
 enormous sum of $124 for the loan of $50 or for the use of $50 for eight 
 years? Is there any financial business going which can pay 13 per cent, 
 per annum, as well as directors* fees, salaries, office rent, printing and all 
 other expenses ? 
 
 The Telegram was the first journal in Canada to call public atten- 
 tion to the dangerous character of the gambling insurance devised in 
 the State of Indiana, under the name of assessment endowments. An 
 attempt is being made to legalize this kind of insurance by the Domi- 
 nion Parliament. The same paper also exposed the plans and methods 
 
58 OF TOKONTO THE <IOOD. 
 
 of the Sexennial League, and the Septennial Henevolent Society with 
 its plans and methods was dealt with in an equally plan and faithful 
 manner. The character of the society and its peculiar operations were 
 brouglit to the attention of the public. 
 
 It is nearly ten years ago since a Mr. George L. Clarkson came to 
 town. He chose the west end as his place of residence and joined the 
 West End V.M.C.A. To the members of that organization he intro- 
 duced himself as the Toronto Agent of the Dominion Life Assurance 
 Company, of Waterloo, Ont. Mr. Clarkson was undoubtedly the agent 
 of the company, but it is equally certain that Manager Hilliard di J not 
 know what sort of man he had to deal with. Mr. Clarkson claimed that 
 his company had struck a scheme whereby a man could be insured for 
 thiee years at as small a premium as that given by any other company, 
 and could at the end of three years have all his premiums returned to 
 him with interest at the rate of four per cent, per annum. This was too 
 good for the young west enders to let pass, and many of them took out 
 policies. Singularly, none of them seem to have read the documents, 
 which contained no promise regarding the return of the premiums at 
 the expiration of the three year term, and Mr. Clarkson accordingly 
 pocketed big commissions, amounting, it is said, to nearly $iO,ooo. The 
 JJominion Life people at the head office in Waterloo, congratulated 
 themselves on having secured such a pushing agent, not knowing of 
 course, the means which were used inorder to get risks. It happened, 
 however, that one of the young men of the Western Y.M.C.A., who had 
 been taicen in, told a friend of his, the agent of another company, how 
 Clarkson's company was giving such advantageous terms. The insurance 
 man laughed at the idea saying no one could live and run a business on 
 such a basis. This roused the suspicions of some of the insured ones, 
 and Manager Hilliard was written to. He was out of town and did not 
 return to Waterloo for some time. When he came back he promptly 
 wrote a letter in which he, as manager of the company, declined to 
 acknowledge any such agreement. Mr. Clarkson was interviewed by 
 several of the men to whom he had made promises, and insisted that 
 everything was all right. In the meantime Clarkson had got a Mr. 
 Jenner to deposit $400 as security in a partnership scheme, and then 
 skipped out. His presence in Toronto would now give pleasure to a 
 number of confiding men whose good money has gone to the States 
 with him. 
 
 In the examination conducted by Mr. Imilius Irwing, Q.C., as to 
 the methods of the Lion Provident Life and Live Stock Insurance 
 Association, the manager admitted that there were judgments against 
 him for $1,500 in the sherifif's hands, and that there were about r 1,000 
 claims in addition which had been disputed on various grounds, but 
 principally because the premium notes had not been paid on the day 
 when they fell due. The receipt of the money on the day following did 
 not suffice. Mr. Jones admitted that he did not bring the clause refer- 
 ring to the latter to the notice of insurers, but it was on the back of the 
 policy. They accepted payments a day or more after they were due, 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 69 
 
 although the policy was voided by the delay in payment, without 
 informing those who paid the notes of the fact. The manager said he 
 took 80 per cent of the receipts for himself. 
 
 BUSINESS IN TORONTO. 
 
 • 
 
 The legitimate business in Toronto is greater than that of any 
 other place in Canada except in Montreal. The city being the centre 
 of Ontario commerce, offers the greatest advantages ofany other in 
 Lanada to persons engaged in trade. Merchants at a distance buy what- 
 ever they can here, as they like to visit the place, and can thus combine 
 business with pleasure. Hundreds of people, or indeed thousands ann- 
 ually visit Toronto, and while here expend large amounts in purchases, 
 besides they are apt to find the best article in the market, as it is but 
 natural that the chief centre of wealth should draw to it the best talent 
 in the arts and trades. 
 
 Merchants from all parts of the province like the liberal and enter- 
 prising spirit which characterises the dealings of Toronto wholesale 
 men. They can buy here on better terms than elsewhere, and their 
 relations with the merchants are generally satisfactory and pleasant. 
 Everything gives way to business. Private neighbourhoods are constantly 
 being encroached upon for the purpose of business ; which is steadily 
 advancing towards the extremities of the city, north, east and west. 
 
 But while the visiting merchant sees only the smooth and finished 
 side of the picture, it is none the less true that there is a dark side to 
 it also. He should see the struggles of the employees in the houses 
 he visits to keep themselves in clothing, and the necessaries of life, and 
 to submit to the overbearing manner and petty tyranny of some one 
 who has had the good fortune to get into a position of trust. I was 
 once commissioned to get some laces for a lady friend of mine residing 
 on the other side, and I presented myself at the wholesale warehouse, 
 which had, by the way just the evening before, advertised for a ware- 
 housemen. I stood to one side while a young man, who had been 
 waiting a few minutes before me, should be attended to first. A phy- 
 sically impotent looking Englishman wearing a skull cap, and possesfa- 
 ing a figure as thin as Cassius, bounced out of the ofiice, and the young 
 man begain : 
 
 "I saw an advertisement in the Telegram last " 
 
 He got no further, the Englishman gave a kind of a yell, and 
 answered : 
 
 ,' Filled ! " them bounced back into his hole again. 
 
 I decided that my lady friend could get her laces at another place, 
 and I quitely passed out of the door. I confess to a feeling of fiendish 
 glee when a while afterwards I heard that the house in question had 
 gone under mostdissastrously. I asked myself if this could be wondered 
 at. In this connection I might mention a circumstance that happened 
 some time ago when the East York campaign was in progress. One of 
 the speakers pointed out the number of young men in the United States, 
 
60 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. » 
 
 and attributed it to the false political economy of the Government of 
 the day. I have no wish to enter into any controversy on the subject 
 politically, but 1 would like to suggest one reason for this. Let any 
 young man enter any business house in the United States, and the 
 probabilities are that he will be received and dismissed with courtesy ; 
 if there is no vacancy he will be told so in a gentlemanly manner, and 
 is never insulted, besides he has lost no self-respect by making the request. 
 I never saw a similar case to the one I have mentioned and I confess 
 my disgust at the reception given to the young man who was an 
 applicant. 
 
 There are, it is a matter of regret to say so, business houses where 
 a man's promotion depends upon his ability to speak evil of his fellow 
 workmen, or in other word to play the sneak. I know a house in the 
 city, where oae man has done this so persistently that he is regarded 
 as dangerous by the other clerks, and he is never the recipient of any 
 of the confidences that are indulged in amongst fellow employees in 
 any concern. He is nevertheless a favourite with the chief clerk, who 
 does everything in his power to promote him. First of all the sneak 
 tells the chief clerk the other clerks* shortcomings, and the chief clerk 
 in turn tells the manager or proprietor, so that both are held in high 
 esteem as being interested in the welfare of the company. Could any- 
 thing be more despicable than this ? It is doubtless within the memory 
 of Torontonians how a young bank clerk had been so harrassed by the 
 Inspector that he was driven to tender his resignation, and when after 
 going to Chicago and being unsuccessful, he was driven to suicicie. 
 When men reach that pitch that they are incessant faultfinders I think 
 there must be something radically wrong with their minds, morbidity 
 or something of that kind, some such disease as impelled the shocking 
 and debased morality characteristic of the exiled Somerset. 
 
 A little story is told of a business house in the city which is worth 
 repeating In some way they are concerned in advertising. One of the 
 customers of the concern, having been behind in his account, and having 
 a contract rate for inserting his advertisement at reduced rates, was 
 refused any further accommodation until the acccount was paid. He 
 declined to pay for some time, and at length the company placed it in 
 the hands of their solicitor for collection. On the back of the contract 
 there is a proviso that if the customer fails or the space is no', all used 
 up, he can be charged full transient rates. This does not apply to a 
 man who does not pay his account, as it would seem clear to the least 
 intelligent, but the chief clerk of the concern decided to have the account 
 made out in that way, and sued it. The debtor fought it out and sub- 
 pccnaed the accountant who had made out the account in the manner 
 ordered by the chief clerk, and in serving him he handed him a dollar 
 bill. The matter never went into court, however, as the solicitor on 
 being given the statement of the case, held that the company would 
 certainly be non-suited, and the debtor having in the meantime paid 
 into the hands of the division court the sum he really owned. Finding 
 this to be the case, the chief clerk in entering the cheque from the soli- 
 citor to be placed to the credit of the account said : 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 61 . 
 
 " I'm going to enter that credit of F 's now, and if you'll give 
 
 me that dollar, I'll put that with the other that I have received." 
 
 " But I spent that money last night, I went to the Grand Opera 
 House, and I have nothing but a ten dollar bill." 
 
 *• Oh, well, I'll get that changed, if you will give it to me." 
 
 The accountant gave the ten dollar bill, and the clerk took it, and 
 placed it to the credit of the account they had used. Is that not a 
 magnificent piece of business ? If it would serve any good purpose I 
 would tell you the name of the concern, but if you knew it it would 
 surprise you. 
 
 A friend of mine, being out of employment, wrote to a firm, one of 
 the principals of which is one of the trustees of one of the leading Pres- 
 byterian churches in the city, and asked for employment. He called a 
 few days after posting the letter, and interviewed the firm. A proposi- 
 tion was made to him that he should work for $8 per week, with an 
 increase at the end of three months to $9, and the next six months to 
 $10. He was asked also to write his biography for the benefit of the 
 firm, stating whether he smoked, drank or chewed, &c., and he was also , 
 requested to get down at eight o'clock in the morning, or rather he 
 stated his ability to do so. This was just half an hour earlier than any 
 of the other clerks, but he did not mind that so much. The member 
 of the firm after reading his letter, wrote the terms on the margin, and 
 my friend signed his acceptance of them. Then the tiger showed iiis 
 claws. Heretofore he had been as smooth as velvet, but when the 
 agreement was signed, he commenced : 
 
 "Of course, you know, we have no sick benefits here, and if a man 
 misses a day he loses it, it is the same for holidays, we do not pretend 
 to be liberal in our dealings with our employees, we exact so much, 
 and we expect it." 
 
 He enumerated a long list of other matter that were too numerous 
 to be remembered, and it is just sufficient for me to say that my friend 
 remained there just four days, and that satisfied him for all time to 
 come. He happened to mention his experience to a young lady friend 
 when she exclaimed : "Don't have anything to do with that man. He * 
 is called the sneak of our church." 
 
 Owing to the prominence given to advertising lately, shopping by 
 mail has become quite a thing of the present. But unless a very fine 
 quality of goods is required you will find it for more satisfactory to buy 
 your goods from our own dealer, if my experience counts for anything, 
 and I think it does. 
 
 A certain store that advertises pretty freely adve/tised a brand of 
 black cashmere sox at 35c. per pair, or three pairs for $1. I was pay- 
 ing a local dealer 40c. per pair, or for more than two pairs at the rate 
 of 37/4' It was a gain of to per cent, so I ordered three pairs. They 
 were considerably coarser than what I was getting at home, and I sent 
 ten cents more for the next finer brand, and they were not any better ' 
 than I was getting at home, nor quite so fine. I ordered some cuffs, 
 and they were very good, and I ordered again, and received some trash 
 
62 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 that were worth about fifteen cents a pair, and beh'eve I could have 
 obtained them for that at the house where I usually dealt at home. 
 Take my advice and keep your money at home, dont buy by mail, you 
 will rue it if you do. 
 
 The true Parisian is always represented as having several means 
 of existence at his or her fingers' ends. It should be the same with the 
 young man or boy in Toronto who is without home or without resour- 
 ces. This applies to the professions as well as to the trades. Adver- 
 tisements f/equently appear where the young man must be a drugcleik, 
 a telegraph operator and a bookkeeper and goodness knows what else. 
 I think the following is really good denoting the requirements for a 
 certain position : 
 
 Wanted a boy who can write shorthand and the caligraph quickly, and make himself 
 generally usaful. Apply to box 443 Telegram. 
 
 I suppose the boy who applied for that position, and could fill it 
 would be offered the princely salary of $3 or $4 per week, with every 
 chance of its being less. 
 
 Here is another : 
 
 Youth about 18. to assist in olTice, one who has bicycle and is willing to learn and anx- 
 ious for advancement Enclose copy of testimonials to Box 283 Telegram. 
 
 I would like to hear whether this youth got $3.00 a week or $2.50, 
 but the following is absolutely princely : 
 
 Young lady as bookkeeper and cashier, wages ^2.50 to $3 per week. Box 444 Telegram. 
 
 After paying her board out of the above it may consistently be 
 asked : Was the young lady expected to prostitute herself to obtain 
 money for her clothes ? 
 
 Wanted — Hustler to sell ordered clothing at a price, one who is expert at measuring 
 and can sell factory cotton for tweed ; good salary to right man, Apply references a"'" where 
 last employed. Box 142 Telegram. 
 
 SUNDAY IN THE CITY. 
 
 I*! Toronto, like all cities of any pretensions, Sunday is a day of 
 rest, bat practically it is the very reverse. The morning is usually de- 
 voted 1:0 church going, and the churches are pretty well filled, for as I 
 mentioned there is a halo of respectability surrounding him who goes 
 to church, which nothing else can give. But those who are impervious 
 to the refining influences of church attendance, if it be summer time, 
 hie themselves down to their boat houses, and prepare for the after- 
 noon sail ; or others again go to the island, there to remain during 
 the day. 
 
 Some afternoons in the spring time, the Queen's Own Rifles have 
 a regular parade to some one of the churches, and if the weather is fine, 
 and it usually is, the streets are thronged with ^he youth and beauty of 
 both sexes. The following is an account from one of the city papers 
 anent a recent church attendance : 
 
 The Queen's Own Rifles mustered 657 strong for church parade. Leaving the drill shed 
 at 3 30 the regiment under,command of Lieut. Col. Hamilton and Majors Dclamerc and Sankey, 
 and headed by the regimental band and bugle corps, marched in half companies by way of 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 63 
 
 Jarvw, Carleton, College and McCaul streets to New Richmond street Methodist church. On 
 Its arrival the regiment occupied the seats on the ground floor, which had been reserved for 
 them. Every inch of the remaining space was occupied by the general public, and as usual on 
 such occasions, hundreds had to be refused admission. During the service Mr. Wilson expressed 
 himself in favour of ci urch parades. He did not believe they were inspired of the devil. He 
 thought that much good would come of the fashion. 
 
 Like all other amusements, or perhaps I should say attractions^ 
 the church parade has its enemies. I give some of the opinions of cler- 
 gymen who ventilate their views at the meetings of their associations : 
 
 After devotional services Rev. Mr. Stark, a retired minister, introduced a resolution 
 condemning the Sunday parades of our volunteers, especially with the reference to the Kilties* 
 parade. The resolution led to quite a spirited debate, some of the brethren being very severe 
 upon the soldier parades. Rev. Mr Parsons said that " the people wanted to play the deVii once 
 a month ; we pose as strict Sabbatarians, but all these military services were merely chasing 
 the devil around the stump." It was generally felt by the members of the Association that the 
 ministers had this matter largely in their own|hands. The opinion was that if the soldiers would 
 only march directly to church instead of taking a circuitous route it might not be so bad. 
 Another said that the very minister who was so opposed to Sabbath desecration was the first to 
 preach to the Kilties. The resolution was withdrawn. 
 
 The same subject appeared to provide a bone of contention for the 
 Baptist Ministerial association. At its meeting the subject was tho- 
 roughly considered in a free talk. 
 
 Rev. Joshua Denovc , a patriarchial representative of the Scottish race, thought it 
 incumbent upon him to vindicate, if possible, his fellow nationalists. If any objection were taken 
 to the parade of the Kilties, the same objection, in his opinion, applied to the parade of the 
 O.O.R. He deprecated, in conclusion, ostentatious demonstrations of any kind on Sunday. 
 Rev. James Grant said that the action of the Queen's Own Rifles in playing the popular air, 
 " Ta ra-ra-boora de ay " on the .Sabbath was shameful. He thought it was a great pity that the 
 Lord's day should be thus secularized. The consensus of opinion as by the ideas expressed by 
 those who took part :n the impromptu debate evidenced was that parades of any kind on the 
 Sabbath were out of order. 
 
 It will be observed in one of the quotations referred to that our 
 mutual friend Rev. Dr. Parsons speaks of chasing the devil around 
 the stump. There are I grieve to say a majority of people who have 
 not the intelligence to see the affinity in connection with church parades 
 and the hazardous diversion of chasing the devil around the stump, so 
 I give the distinguished divine's remarks as delivered to an ignorant 
 public, and commend them as indicative of the Reverend gentlemen's 
 sapiency. Appropos of the term "distinguished divine," I think that 
 is the correct phrase in the case, and is applicable in all cases of refer- 
 ring to the clergy, at least it is the style adopted by the press. 
 
 In the afternoon, the park and gardens are open in the summer 
 and those who are intellectually inclined will find a rich treat in store 
 for them if they go to the park. The Salvation army holds forth in all 
 its glory and beauty, distinguished by sacred words adapted to the 
 tunes of different waltzes, bar-room songs, and any class you can think 
 of, while the partakers therein are ever and anon, moved by the spirit 
 to give vent to their holiness and happiness, by yelling, " Glory be to 
 God," "Praise be to God," and various other expressions too numeroufi 
 to recollect. 
 
 A new by-law prevents speaking in the park, and to the majority 
 it is a welcome boom. Some time ago the park used to be filled with 
 men who believed themselves, like Joan of Arc, to be divinely inspired, 
 and held forth in great style. 
 
64 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 A dirty, greasy-looking individual used to expound the true Pro- 
 testant faith, and the corresponding errors of the Church of Rome in 
 accordance with the views of Maria Monk, and others of that ilk, but 
 this tyrannical by-law deprived him of this privilege, and he is quite 
 disconsolate thereat. 
 
 It was proposed to employ a band to play in the Queen's park 
 every Sunday afternoon, but this idea was voted down in council, though 
 I confess I see no possible objection to it, except that it would be a 
 welcome diversion to the working-man, but it would be also a source 
 of attraction to children who otherwise are penned up in a stifling 
 Sunday school, having dry as dust texts sweltered into their little bodies, 
 which they must bear in the same manner as the children of Israel 
 bore their trials at the hands of the Egyptians. 
 
 At night the streets are crowded with people of both sexes, espe- 
 cially Yonge and Queen, and the promenade is kept up until nearly 
 eleven when the streets become entirely deserted. 
 
 By a recent decision sacred concerts at the Island or in the city 
 or elsewhere are as lawful on the Sabbath as on a work day. Chief 
 Justice Armour and Mr. Justice Street having so held and as a 
 result quashed Magistrate Denison's conviction of Band-master John 
 Bayley of the Q.O.R., for playing sacred music at Hanlan's Point on a 
 Sunday afternoon in August last. Magistrate Denison held he was 
 guilty of a violation of the Lord's Day Act, that he was pursuing "his 
 wordly calling" unlawfully and fined him $i and costs. But with all 
 due deference Mr. Bayley differed as did the counsel, in their inter- 
 pretation of the "act to prevent the profanation of the Lord's day " from 
 that of the Court street judiciary, and obtained a reserved case, which 
 was argued with the above result in the Divisional Court to-day. The 
 argument was brief, the court at the outset favouring the appeal against 
 the conviction, and holding the act was no more intended to apply to a 
 bandmaster than to an organist in a church. The Appeal allowed with 
 costs. B. B. Osier, Q.C., appeared for Mr. Bayley, and Mr. Moss, Q.C., 
 for the Crown. The concerts :vere free and were provided by the 
 Toronto Ferry Co. 
 
 And now, horror for horrors ! the populace of Toronto hi.ve decided 
 by a good substantial vote that they desire street cars on Sunday 
 and they have them. 
 
 THE DETECTIVES. 
 
 The detectives are under the supervision of Inspector Stark, and 
 are men of experience, intelligence and energy. They are well skilled 
 in the art of ferreting out crimes, and generally succeed in the objects 
 which engage their attention. They are distinct from the police force, 
 though they are subject to the order of the Commissioners. It requires 
 an unusual amount of intelligence to make a good detective, in addition 
 to which a man must be honest, determined, and brave, and complete 
 master over every feeling of his nature. He must be also capable of 
 great endurance, of great fertility of resource, and possessed of no little 
 ingenuity. 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 65 
 
 They are always to be found on Court street, where they have 
 separate apartments when not on duty. Strangers coming to the city 
 get drunk over night in places of bad repute and arc robbed, and the 
 next morning they come to ask the aid of the police in discovering 
 their property. If their statement of the circumstances is true, they 
 can generally recover the lost articles through the aid of detectives, if 
 they can be recover at all. They are in constant telegraphic communi- 
 cation with other cities, and are receiving or giving intelligence of crim- 
 inal matters and movements so that if a crime is committed in any 
 city, the police force of the whole continent really is on the alert for 
 the apprehension of the criminal. 
 
 The individually of crime is remarkable. Each burglar has a 
 distinct method of conducting his operations, and the experience of the 
 detectives enable them to recognize these marks or characteristics in a 
 moment. Thanks to this experience, which is the result of long and 
 patient study, he is rarely at a loss to name the perpetrator of a crime, 
 if not person a professional. Appearance which have no significance 
 for the mere outsider are pregnant with meaning to him. 
 
 If persons seeking the aid of the detectives would tell the truth in 
 their statements the aid rendered ^hem would be much more effica- 
 cious and speedy, for as a rule the detective can tell from the nature 
 of the loss whether the statement of the circumstances be true or false. 
 Persons are often indignant that those who have robbed them are not 
 arrested and held for trial. Undoubtedly this would be a very desirable 
 thing but it is not always possible. Frequently no evidence can be 
 obtained against the guilty party, whose arrest would be a useless 
 expense to the city, and the detective in such cases is compelled to 
 content himself with the recovery of the stolen property. The stolen 
 goods thus recovered and restored to their owners is estimated to amount 
 to a very large sum annually. 
 
 In many cases the detective is very loth to arrest the culprit. It 
 may be the <.rst offence of some youth, or he may have been forced on 
 by circumstances which an experienced officer can understand and 
 appreciate. In such cases he leans to the side of mercy, and his advice 
 to the party against whom the offence has been committed is not to 
 resort to the law, but to tr>' the offender again. In this wa> they have 
 saved many a soul from the ruin which an exposure and punishment 
 would have caused, and have brought back many an erring one to the 
 paths of virtue and integrity. 
 
 While Toronto very consistently congratulates herself upon her 
 immunity from the dark crimes such as ha'^e occurred in New York, 
 Chicago and London, and other large cities, there is a special dispen- 
 sation of Providence she has perhaps not taken into consideration and 
 congratulated herself upon, and that is her immunity from that crowning 
 affliction — a detective story. 
 
 I do not refer to those literary masterpieces of absorbing interest 
 and unrivalled delineation of character written by Emile Gaboriau, 
 whose works are unquestionably a credit to the literature of any country, 
 
66 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 and in whose novels not the first trace of inconsistency nor any weari- 
 some unnatural conversations can be found, but to that rubbish which 
 has been flooded over the country written by detectives, ex-detectives 
 and would be detectives, that nas been described by the publishers 
 thereof in their circulars to a confiding public and an indulgent press 
 as "thrilling," but which possess neither literary merit nor the possib- 
 ility of reality. 
 
 Do you suppose a child could give a written description of the 
 mysteries of astronomy ? The proposition is absurd upon its face, 
 because a child knows nothing at all about it, and its intellect would 
 be incapable of grasping the subject. Then it is just as reasonable to 
 expect from the pen of an underbred policeman a correct delineation 
 of character, and an account of the manners and customs of well- bred 
 people as to expect a chila to explain the system that has puzzled the 
 ablest scientist of the universe. 
 
 I am not in any respect exaggerating the picture. Some time ago 
 a firm of publishers sent me some of this trash to review. They were 
 like the laboured efforts of a junior schoolboy to fill up paper, and any- 
 one reading the accounts given of fashionable life would exclaim at 
 once, " the writer is not a parvenu but a would be parvenu." Imagine 
 a gentleman of good-breeding calling his daughter "Miss Emma" to 
 one of his friends, or speaking of his house as "the mansion." 
 
 Again take the denouements of these novels, and their very tame- 
 ness is absurd, and altogether weak and inconsistent. As an example 
 a New York belle is married, and her father a millionaire, is giving her 
 a most magnificent present. On the night of the mariage, the bride is 
 kidnapped, and until a certain sum is paid, one hundred thqusand 
 dollars, the bride will be held as a hostage. The distracted father puts 
 the detectives on the track, and ^■'^ his herror finds that the villain who 
 kidnapped his daughter is an old-time acquaintance, who happens to 
 know of an incident in the old gentleman's early life, which he holds over 
 him like the sword of Damascus. To be discovered he knows would be 
 social ostracism, and he is about crazy, rot knowing which way to turn, 
 and almost deciding to give up the hundred thousand dollars. After 
 wading through wearisome prosaics, the reader necessarily expects to 
 be rewarded for his Job-like patience by some terrible tragedy in which 
 the old man has taken part. 
 
 Vain expectation. When everything comes out all right, the villain 
 dead ; the agonized husband his wife restored to him, and the righteous 
 triumph of the good over the bad, the reader is coldly informed that 
 the father had committed seduction in his early manhood, and endured 
 the agonies of Gethsemane in fear that he might be discovered and be 
 socially ruined. 
 
 To anyone acquainted with our national character, the absurdity 
 of this conclusion is at once apparent. He might just as vvpll have said 
 the old man had drunk a glass of beer, and feared social ostracism, 
 which would have been just as reasonable as to express the idea that 
 he did. Such an act in a man's life is no more consequence socially, 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 67 
 
 than a change of diet would be. The great wonder to me is that 
 publishers can be such fools as to publish such dishwater. Imagine for 
 one moment the difference btlveen the writings of the courtly French- 
 man whose plots are marvels of depth of thought and study, and whose 
 language is grace and elegance itself, and those of the others who lurfeit 
 their compositions with italics and exclamation points in such profusion 
 as to make a compositor frantic with rage, and yet it is simply the 
 childish propensity of the school boy who has learned a new trick which 
 he thinks clever, and is incessantly practising it ; besides unlimited 
 interjections such as " there came a time when Sephronia remembered 
 those words of Samantha's " in almost every chapter. I have read the 
 prosaic trash ofthePinkerton's ; the conglomerations of an ex-detective 
 a Mr. Lynch, and Anna Catharine Green's water- brained productions 
 which lack the elements of satisfactory explanations of her extravagant 
 plots, and I am pleased to congratulate Toronto on her escape from 
 having such bosh added to its already over-burdened soul. 
 
 When the work's written by Mr. Lynch were sent to the news- 
 paper upon which I was employed, the publishers informed us that this 
 particular work '• had made hin* famous." It may have done so, but 
 that only proves how cheaply fame may be bought. 
 
 I laugh when I read the high sounding names they give their 
 characters, the Lois Clarendons, Irene Chesterfields, Ethel Delafields 
 and such like, but if their delineations of the characters of the people 
 demonstrate anything it proves that Mary Ellen Jones would be the 
 proper name for the majority. 
 
 HOTELS. 
 
 There are quite a number of people both married and single who 
 prefer to board than keep house. Of these a large number board at 
 the hotels, and the others in boarding houses. 
 
 The principal hotels of the city are the Queen's, Rossin, Walker, 
 Arlington, Palmer, Metropole, and a large number of minor hotels of 
 less importance, some of which are really good, but do not make special 
 efforts to meet the travelling public that those first mentioned do. The 
 tjansient custom of these hotels is very large, but the permanent 
 boarders of these establishments are also very profitable. The rates 
 are somewhat high, and the majority pay their proprietors well. There 
 are two classes known in the city, those which are conducted on the 
 American plan, and those known as the European plan. The former 
 provide their guests with lodgings and full board at so much per day 
 or week, while the others furnish merely the room and attendance, and 
 are either without the means of supplying meals to their guests, or 
 charge for each article of food separately. The European plan has 
 almost gone o it of date, and in fact can hardly be said to exist at all, 
 proving conclusively the popularity of the American style. 
 
 The proprietors of hotels are very active in their efforts to exclude 
 improper characters from their houses, but with all their vigilance, do 
 not succeed in doing so. One is never certain as to the respectability 
 
H8 OF TOKONTO ^^HE GOOD. 
 
 of his neighbours at the table and it is well never to be in a hurry to 
 form acquaintanceships at such places Gamblers and those of that ilk- 
 abound at such places, and the proprietor cannot put them out until they 
 commit some overt act, inasmuch as he might possibly get himself into 
 trouble, as he is required by law to give accommodation to anyone who 
 will pay for it. As soon, however, as his attention is called to any 
 improper conduct on their part, they are turned into the street, no 
 matter at what hour of the day or night and left to shift for themselves. 
 
 Appropos of this law requiring that the proprietors of hotels shall 
 accommodate any guest who is prepared to pay therefor, Messrs McGaw 
 and Winnet of the Queen's, had a somewhat unpleasant experience 
 with a coloured man hailing, I think, from Chatham, and who, I believe, 
 they declined to accommodate on account of the lack of room. The 
 irate guest got into quite a rage, and threatened suit for damages through 
 Messrs. Blake, Lash and Cassels, but the matter was never threshed 
 out and I do not know how it was settled. 
 
 All hotels are the legitimate prey of swindlers, and the devices 
 used are as varied as are the kinds of the operators. It is not a very 
 difficult matter for a man who has sufficient assurance to get a meal 
 without paying for it. He can manage to get in the dining room, if he 
 knows the lay of the house, and by pure nonchalance pass muster, 
 though he runs the risk, nevertheless, of being detected. 
 
 At one time there existed a mania for stealing or exchanging 
 clothing in some of the best hotels, though the practice can better be 
 carried out now in those of more modest pretensions, inasmuch as the 
 best hotels employ a man or boy to take charge of the hats and coats 
 of the guests as they enter the dining room, but even with the very 
 best surveillance things are often cribbed. For instance a man may 
 quite easily slip a fur cap in his overcoat pocket, and if the man who 
 is in charge happens to be engaged in assisting some one else, the 
 thiefs chances of detection are very meagre, but these thefts do not 
 happen very frequently, and generally only during some very busy 
 time, such as when the exhibition is on, and the hotels are thonged 
 with strangers. It is customary, I believe, or else the law requires that 
 the landlord shall make good any loss of this nature. 
 
 It is a most difficult matter for a hotel to get along without being 
 occasionally swindled, but as a rule the amounts out of which they are 
 defrauded are uot large. A man may go to a hotel and stay a week or 
 ten days, and settle his account, and he is then presumed to be pretty 
 good pay. He remains perhaps a month longer, and then suddenly 
 leaves, leaving behind him perhaps a hand bag worth a couple of dollars 
 and some old clothing of perhaps one half that value to take up his 
 residence in some other place to repeat the same game. 
 
 A somewhat peculiar incident happened some years ago, in which 
 a young fellow of nineteen or twenty figured, and demonstrates that one 
 can never trust to appearances. He was an innocent looking bo);, rather 
 good looking, and an American. On his arrival in the city he took up 
 his abode at one of the numerous boarding houses on King street west, 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 69 
 
 and proceeded to look for a position. Not being successful, he left this 
 house and took up his quarters at one of the leading hotels, remaining 
 there some days. In the meantime he had made the acquanitance 
 of a gentleman engaged in mercantile pursuits in the city who was 
 endeavouring to get him a position. At length the manager of the 
 hotel came to the conclusion that all was not as it should be, and he 
 
 requested a settlement. The young man stated that Mr (his friend), 
 
 had some money belonging to him in the Ontario Bank, and that he 
 would settle his account as soon as this friend had drawn the money 
 out. In the meantime the manager called the friend up by telephone. 
 
 " Is that Mr. Blank ? " he asked. 
 
 " Yes." 
 
 "Well, this is Mr. Jones of the House. Do you know a young 
 
 man by name of ?" 
 
 " Yes, 1 know him casually, but nothing more. He has been trying 
 to get a position in the city here, and I have been doing what I can to 
 help him, but that is practically all I know of him." 
 
 " Well, have you any money belonging to him ? " 
 
 " No, I have not." 
 
 " He says that you have some hundred dollars in the Ontario Bank 
 belonging to him." 
 
 *' That is not so. I have no account there as a matter of fact, and 
 I certainly have no money belonging to him." 
 
 •' He says that you have, but if he comes in to see you this morn- 
 ing, don't say that i have spoken to you, will you ? " 
 
 " No, certainly not." 
 
 A few minutes later the manager called on the gentleman to whom 
 he had been telephoning, and the above conversation was confirmed, 
 but the young man in question never put in an appearance from that 
 time at either the hotel or the office where his friend worked. 
 
 That is one incident in many where the hotels are swindled, and 
 were the rooms of some of the hotels where they keep this old truck 
 examined, some funny things would doubtless be brought to light. 
 
 In the management of these concerns it is not necessary to speak 
 more than to state that where a specialty is made of keeping perma- 
 nent boarders a few of the ideas expressed by those who take up their 
 residence in such places may not be out of place. A common cause of 
 complaint in one place where I resided was the fact that the places of 
 the permanent boarders were incessantly taken by transient people, and 
 then quite frequently by a most disgusting crowd into the bargain. 
 
 One man, a tailor, and been in the habit of going to a hotel on 
 Yonge street for dinner, and his diet consisted of the coarsest kind of 
 food, such as corned beef and cabbage, and beer the latter of which in 
 time produced its usual eflfect, and in exact ratio as his wits became 
 clouded, did his ill-breeding demonstrate itself. He would use his 
 napkin in a place of a handkerchief, cough and spit on the floor, and his 
 mouth would make a noise not like one pig, but like two or three. I 
 can not understand how a man with an ordinary degree of intelligence 
 
70 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. . 
 
 can sit day after clay and see people properly conduct themselves at the 
 table and not take pattern. 
 
 At the same house, a German, whom I took to be an insurance 
 agent was just about as bad — or more so. His place at the table was 
 always filthy after he had left it ; his food would be scattered all over 
 the table and chair, and no one would sit there after him, and certainly 
 they can scarcely be biamed. 
 
 You may sit at a table at a hotel after day, and the characters you 
 meet there are really innumerable, and now here is a better opportu- 
 nity to judge human nature. 
 
 At one hotel where I was a guest a middle a^ed man, or perhaps 
 an elderly man would suit the bill better, as he was somewhere in the 
 neighbourhood of sixty. It was just about the time when it was in- 
 tended to convert Weston into a town. It seems that some of the 
 wealthier men of the place did not want this conversion, and had given 
 their opinions at a public meeting. Our friend, who was in favour of 
 the scheme, seemed to have spread himself at this meeting. The guests 
 at the table were not in any respect interested in the matter, but he 
 seemed to think they were his legitimate prey to be talked to, and he 
 gave himself that pleasure. He spoke to no one in particular, but loud 
 enough to be heard all over the table. 
 
 " As I stated yesterday," he remarked complacently, " at the two 
 meetings where I spoke, money was never yet know to buy brains." 
 
 This was intended to apply to one of the wealthy man who had 
 the audacity to oppose him. Besides it gave the impression that his 
 own intellect was above criticism. 
 
 "When these people buck against me," he added, "they may just 
 as well know at once who they are bucking against. I say now as I 
 said this afternoon, that brains is a natural gift, and any man can make 
 money. I had the whole audience with me." 
 
 The illustrious gentleman glanced around the festive board and 
 not having received that applause he considered himself entitled to, 
 arose and left the table. 
 
 " Who may that be ? " inquited one the gentleman who had been 
 an amused listener to the conversation of the distinguished speaker. 
 " I do not know what his name is," someone replied. 
 " I had an idea from his manner that he might have been the 
 Son of God." 
 
 Men seem to think the hotel tabit is the proper place to air them- 
 selves, but to the man of good taste it will appear at once as indicative 
 of bad breeding for anyone to tell his own business and its achievements 
 before people who are perfect strangers to him. On the following 
 morning when Mr. Winbag came to the table he did not receive that 
 cordial reception he considered himself entitled to from his manner the 
 previous evening. He sat down to the table without ever receiving the 
 time of day. 
 
 " Well," he exclaimed cheerfully. " How is the weather this 
 morning ? " 
 
OF TOfiONTO THE GOOD. 71 
 
 As no one seemed to answer him, he turned to the last comer, and 
 demanded in the style of a cross-examiner : 
 " Is it cold out ? " 
 
 '• Not particularly," the gentleman answered curtly, as if to end 
 the conversation. 
 
 " Is it as cold out as it was yesterday morning ? " he asked 
 persistently. 
 
 " I don't carry a thermometer," the other replied coolly, " but if 
 you wish to know the weather so minutely, you might take a walk 
 around the block and find out for yourself." 
 
 "And you might learn to answer politely," was the angry rejoinder. 
 
 " When a gentleman asks me a question, I usually answer him to 
 
 the best of my ability," the other retorted, "but I don't propose to 
 
 allow any windbag like you to gratify his curiosity by me, so I gave 
 
 you the answer you deserve." 
 
 The table was not annoyed by him again. 
 
 We have all met the American woman or lady (there f.re no women 
 in America) who, though she is a guest at a hotel which is not first 
 class, still regards herself in a measure as the mentor of the creatures 
 at the table. Being only the wife of a mechanic she appears to think 
 the Canadians are somewhat of a benighted race, and the women do 
 not know their own worth. You can judge all these characteristics by 
 her face and its expression ; the vulgar insolence which she thinks is 
 independence ; the manner of reaching over the table for what she 
 wants, shows that she is " a lady," although some gentlemen consider 
 it ill-bred, a"d then the manner she assumes when she snaps off a 
 grape at a time from the dish instead of taking a bunch as a low bred 
 Canadian would do. 
 
 Another gentleman sits at the table and sucks his teeth, by some 
 this is considered ill-bred. But to him it demonstrates his opulent 
 manners and familiarity with the code of good breding. 
 
 You will find men and women too, by the hundreds who have as 
 n.uch idea of table etiquette as an Indian. My friend Hawley Smart 
 hits them off perfectly. " They are " he says, "not above harpooning 
 anything they fancy with their own forks and utterly ignore salt spoons 
 while their knives are in that hand, plunging the blade in freely when 
 wanting that condiment." He might have added with equal truth that 
 a large proportion do not seem to know what their forks are for, veget- 
 ables, everything, being shovelled in with their knives. 
 
 These are a few of the characteristics of the people one meets with 
 at the hotel table, and they could be enumerated by the hundred. 
 
 RESTAURANTS and BOARDING HOUSES. 
 
 RESTAURANTS. 
 
 Of this class of eating houses you will find the city is beautifully 
 supplied, and as your means are limited or unlimited so you can choose 
 a particular restaurant. McConkcy's and Harry Webb's head the list 
 
72 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 of popular and fashionable restaurants, and everything is got up in first 
 class style and cleanliness, but they are, comparatively speaking, ex- 
 pensive, and it is not every one who can afford to indulge in such 
 luxury. 
 
 Nearly all the down-town restaurants do a good business during 
 lunch time. So many men and boys who live in the extreme ends of 
 the city prefer to go lo a restaurant for a sandwich and a cup of coffee, 
 if nothing more, than to eat a cold lunch and remain in a cheerless 
 warehouse during noon hour. There are some restaurants where boarders 
 are taken, and those can usually count on having their seats reserved for 
 them, which is quite an advantage especially during the busy season. 
 
 An amusing incident occurred in a well-known Yonge street rest- 
 aurant by which a conceited ass was beautifully come up to. He had a 
 great habit of planting himself at a table intended only for boarders, 
 and as he finished each course, and was waiting for another be would 
 spraad out his arms and take up almost the whole side of the table. 
 This continued for some time, when exasperated beyond measure, his 
 left hand neighbour ordered soup, which, as fate would have it, was 
 thick and greasy. He toyed with it for some time until the proper 
 time came, when he adroitly pushed it to one side. In a moment down 
 came the elbow of the sinning one into the thick and gresy mess. 
 
 " Excuse — G...d d...n the luck, my coat is ruined." 
 
 The young man made haste to apologise, and graciously handed 
 him a napkin, but the old man did not again take up the entire side of 
 the table that day. 
 
 It is absolutely surprising how little men know of table etiquette 
 when brought into contact which their fellow men. Men who are con- 
 sidered models in business life, seem to forget that in a restaurant there 
 is an unwritten law requiring the observance of certain rules, to demon- 
 strate that they are men and not pigs, by the observance of which men 
 are judged of their bringing up. 
 
 A close observer of human nature who has spent considerable 
 time in the different restaurants in the city gives his experience. 
 
 " I came here," he observed, " from King street east where I used 
 to put up, but it got to be so extremely disgusting there that I had to 
 move. I never drink tea or coffee but usually milk. The dose I got 
 on several occasions so turned my stomach that I never asked again, 
 you could absolutely smell the onions, as though the goblet had never 
 been washed, so I had to quit there. 
 
 " My next place was nearer the heart of the city, but after being 
 there a short time I came to the conclusion that I must be very hard 
 to please, for I was disgusted in no time. Just at this season of the 
 year you know, there is an influx of veterinary students , all fresh from 
 the farm, and who all know more than the professors themselves. I 
 had the misfortune to be placed at a table where a crowd of Americans 
 were congregated, and at every meal the same subjects were discussed ; 
 dogs, horses and cows were all dissected at the table and the dissection 
 criticised, until at length I was obliged to move to another table, these 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 73 
 
 discussions of such scientific subjects were beyond my limited compre- 
 hension, and appreciation, therefore, I asked to be removed. I do not 
 in any way impugn the right of free discussion, nor do 1 say anything 
 of the question of good breeding, for all Americans are gentlemen, and 
 it was unquestionably my beclouded intellect and not the lack of good 
 manners on their part which was the cause of my inability to sym- 
 pathise with their discussions. 
 
 " I had a fairly good time at the table where I was next seated, 
 and the girl was a gem, but I had the misfortune to change my dinner 
 hour, and a man whom I had never seen before was placed next to me. 
 He was a man with a black heard, and was disposed to be most cheerful 
 under any and all circumstances, and it is perhaps, superfluous to say 
 he was an extremely religious man. During all the dinner hour he 
 discussed church matters with his right hand man, and it was astonish- 
 ing how animated the conversation would become. At length he 
 commenced on me, but my taciturnity did not seem in the leastwise to 
 give him any embarrassment ; he rushed ahead like a torrent, and 
 realizing that I was unable to check him, I permitted him to talk until 
 he got tired, and I resorted to reading a newspaper. When the Exhi- 
 bition with its myriads of people came my place was given to some 
 transient guests until at least I was compelled to seek another place. 
 
 " Waitresses seen to think you are their natural enemies, and 
 they yours, and I used to sit sometimes a quarter of an hour in the 
 morning without the girl ever coming near me, and than I did not get 
 what I wanted ; if I asked for boiled eggs, I either got them so hard 
 that I could not eat them, or they were so soft that they were disgust- 
 ing ; and you might as well spare yourself the trouble of complaining, 
 for all the good it would do you, so now I take my meals at a first class 
 house on the European plan, and if I don't like it I simply go and try 
 some other place." 
 
 The swindler, as usual, has his experience with the restaurant, and 
 frequently gets the start of them in ways that are peculiar and laugh- 
 able. Two will go to a place together, and order what they want, and 
 as soon as they are nearly through the waitress gives them a ticket with 
 the amount of their bill on it, each being separate ; one will get through 
 before the other, and they make it a point to sit apart, so that he 
 who gets through first approaches his companion and begins a conver- 
 sation until the other gets nearly through when number one decides to 
 try something on the bill that he did not notice before ; he receives 
 another ticket, and the two start out together, when one ticket is pre- 
 sented and only a part of the bill is paid, so the fellow gets a good 
 supper for the price of the small dish he took a fancy to as he was 
 getting ready to go out. Other times a man will stand and talk to a 
 friend after he has got his check, and hang around until the cashier has 
 forgotten to keep an eye on him, and he quietly steps out. 
 
 BOARDING HOUSES. 
 
 Any stranger in the city who is looking for a boarding house has 
 only to consult the condensed advertisements of the Telegram to find 
 
74 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 a long list of places to call on, but that he will be suited is quite another 
 question. There is, it seems to me, a good opening for a really good 
 boarding house in a central locality, and circumstances prove the phi- 
 losophy of my opinion. 
 
 Some years ago a lady kept a boarding house on Adelaide street, 
 and it was always crowded ; the reason was very simple, everything 
 was scrupulously clean, the attention was good, and only those who 
 conducted themselves as gentlemen were allowed to live thcr_. It is 
 now the ccstom, almost universal for the young men, to rent a room in 
 some suitable locality, and then take their meals somewhere else. 
 
 Boarding houses, like hotels, have their peculiar characteristics. In 
 some of the former, there is no desire apparently to please. If you like 
 pie hot, you are almost certain to get it cold, or the apple sauce is full 
 of enormous lumps that almost turn your stomach, and the characters 
 you meet in some of them are sources ol never failing amusement. 
 
 My experience has been a somewhat varied one, and the people 
 I have met and their peculiarities would all fill a volume. At one table 
 where I sat was a man who used to come to dinner only. He was 
 engaged in some business in the city, and lived away up in the east 
 end. He frequently spoke of his Sunday school class, and after ordering 
 his dessert he would use his fork for a tooth-pick, which of course he 
 had a perfect right to do, even though it might be considered some- 
 what ill-bredo I observed him on several occasions, and finally one 
 day I stared him out of contenance, and I suppose he saw that it was 
 not exactly the thing to do, and he stopped it. 
 
 We have all met the men who opens his mouth to its full width 
 while chewing his food,* and smacks his lips every time they come 
 together, and who, in eating pie, grabs a piece from the plate, and bites 
 it in the same way as he does bread, ignoring the fact that pie accord- 
 ing to the usages of good society is to b^, eaten with a fork, yet this 
 specimen of humanity is to be found in every boarding house, though 
 one would think that once seeing how respectable people eat they would 
 take pattern. 
 
 There is perhaps no place in the world where a man's ill-breeding 
 shows itself in such glaring prominence as at the table of a boarding 
 house. A man sits next to you who eats his soup like a pig at a trough, 
 another will hawk, and finally spit on the floor, while a third, not to be 
 outdone fills his food with pepper and begins to sneeze, using his napkin 
 for a handkerchief, and some of these men really consider themselves 
 well-bred. 
 
 I cannot unu . ,d how it is that when a boarding house once 
 secures a class of nen, they never make any effort to keep them, and 
 yet it would certainly pay to do so ; if a young man gets a house that 
 suits him he is certain to stay there, but after a while the board and 
 the attendance become so bad that he needs be a saint if he can put up 
 with it. To make money is the aim of almost every one's life, but the 
 shortsightedness of the boarding house keeper is like the shortsighted- 
 ness of the storekeeper who cheats his customers and imagines they 
 will come back. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 75 
 
 To the wayfaring man who desires a rational amount to eat and 
 is not a gourroond, I suggest that he decide to pay a fair compensation 
 to a hotel that sets a decent table, and he will find it will relieve him 
 of much vexation of spirit. 
 
 The following seductive advertisement canght my eye, and I 
 decided to give it a trial : 
 
 Boarders — Table Iwarders can be suitably accommodated at . . Queen corner of King. 
 Dining room on ist f!oor; large, welllightPd and elegantly furnished. Every attention given, 
 same as in first class hotel. Delicacies of the season always provided. — Terms moderate. 
 
 For breakfast we had thick, lumpy porridge first, and four days 
 out of seven we had liver and bacon. I-,iver and bacon are not bad, 
 but this liver and baron bore a striking resemblance to fried gristle and 
 leather. I have never tasted the latter, but I imagine there would not 
 be much difference. The liver looked as though it had been dried in 
 the sun for a week or so, and then cooked for an hour or two ; while the 
 bacon I should judge had been si.jsling for three hours at the least. It 
 would almost break like clay when you touched it. 
 
 " Livernbacon " said the waitress to me one morning. 
 
 " I had liver and bacon yesterday hiorning, didnt' I .'' " I asked, 
 meekly. • , 
 
 "Yes." 
 
 " Very well." I said " I will have the same this morning, if it isi.'t 
 
 in use." 
 
 I put two little pieces in some paper, intending to get them photo- 
 graphed, but they were mislaid, and I cannot, therefore, give you tha^ 
 pleasure. 
 
 We usually had toast, dry, thin hard stuff that looked and tasted 
 as though it had been baked, while there wa'* a square slab of streaky 
 looking stuff the lively imagination of the landlady dignified by the 
 name of butter, and it was invariably bad. If we protested that the 
 butter was bad, we were assured that it was impossible to get any better, 
 — a statement I am prepared to believe, if she had added at the price 
 she was willing to pay. 
 
 Sometimes we had steak, and such stuff — what I got I think must 
 have done service for four or five before it came to me. It was usually 
 thick with pepper and chopped with a knife during the process of 
 cooking — I never saw anything like it before. Something was put before 
 one gentleman one morning which the waitress called steak, but which 
 he sent back with the remark that it was cold roasted beef cooked over. 
 
 For lunch, we had things that are indescribable, sometimes we 
 had soup. For instance if we had had peas for dinner the night before, 
 we would have a thick, slimey, greasy liquid, cold pea soup, if we had 
 beans a previous evening, it would be bean soup {consequently I never 
 ate any. The left over mashed potatoes from the previous evening's 
 dinner were sometimes fried and sometimes worked over into croquettes 
 and were always served cold. I never stayed to catch any. But where 
 the landlady shone was <n her manipulation of cake. Little cakes that 
 are sold at ten cents a dozen, were divided up into beautifully cut little 
 
76 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 quarters or sometimes into six, and spread over the dish to make them 
 look almost countless. I always drank two cups of tea to fill up on, 
 although it invariably tasted like boiled hay. There arc people, of 
 course, who prefer their tea boiled two hours instead of one, but this 
 lady boiled hers for three, apparently, on the principle that everyone 
 might be suited. Dinner was served at six, and the vegetables were 
 always cold, on Wednesday nights we had a composition of th<; week's 
 remains called beefsteak and kidney pie. Now, I don't consider myself 
 as being in any respect hard to please, as I stayed in that house nearly 
 two years, and only left when the landlady desired to wait upon me 
 herself. Ihe line had to be drawn somewhere and I drew it at that. 
 She had indigestion, and I used to bear her all over the house belching 
 up the wind off her stomach and she cleaned her finger nails in the 
 dining room, I couldn't stand that, and when to it is added the addi- 
 tional charm that she used to listen at the doors, I decided after we 
 had a row about her waiting on me, that I would leave, and I did so, 
 
 HOLIDAYS IN THE CITY. 
 
 Toronto is very careful to observe the holidays of the year, the 
 orthodox English element tending to preserve in all its purity each of 
 the festivals of our fathars or a great national holiday. 
 
 ON NEW YEAR'S DAY. 
 
 The whole city is stirring by ten o'clock, and the streets are filled 
 with gentlemen on their way to make their annual calls. Private car- 
 riages, hacks and other vehicles soon appear filled with persons bent 
 on similar missions. Business is entirely suspended in the city, the day 
 is a legal holiday, and it is faithfully observed by all classes ; the cars 
 art crowded and if the weather is fine, everyone is in the highest spirits. 
 V) omen very rarely appear in the streets in the morning, but in the 
 afternoon King street is crowded. The matinees at the theatres are 
 crowded, especially by young people, and an effort is always made to 
 have a good attraction. Government House is always a scene of great 
 attraction, as all the leading lights in the city pay their respects there. 
 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Toronto and the Episcopal and 
 other clergy all make New Year's calls. 
 
 queen's birthday. 
 
 The birthday of our Gracious Queen is always kept throughout the 
 country, and as it comes at a time when the whether is most delightful 
 it is looked forward to for weeks and days before. Excursions to and 
 from every available place are largely patronized, and the city is quite 
 deserted. A large part of the day is devoted to fire-crackers, Roman 
 candles &c., and though the police try to stop them, it is almost impos- 
 sible to do so; the city resounds with the discharges, and the air is 
 filled with sulphurious vapour. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 77 
 
 THE FIRST OF JULY. 
 
 Canada's birthday of Confederation is alwas celebrated in a com- 
 mendable manner, but the extreme heat that usually prevails on that 
 day makes it almost impossible of enjoyment, but like the 24th of 
 May, great preparations are made for it, and excursions are sent out all 
 over, the outgoing steamers being crowded. In the city the lacrosse 
 team usually have a team visit them, and they are well patronized by 
 an enthusiastic audience. 
 
 THANKSGIVING DAY. 
 
 This day is commemorated by morning services in all the churches, 
 and the rest of the day is given to rest and social enjoyment, and a 
 bountiful dinner. In the afternoon the theatres are thronged with 
 crowds of young and old. 
 
 CHRISTMAS DAY. 
 
 Every thing gives way to the merry march of the Yuletide monarch. 
 The streets are teeming with preparations for the great Christmas fest- 
 ival, and peace and good will are the universal conditions which animate 
 the human family the whole world over. 
 
 One of the gladsome features of the Christmas season, however, 
 undoubtedly is the spirit of kindness and benevolence which becomes 
 universally diffused. This is essentially a season in which the wants 
 and necessities of others are relieved by their more fortunate brethren. 
 
 The St. George's society of Toronto make it their special charge 
 to see the more necessitous among those who hail from Merry England. 
 
 In connection with the Irish Protestant Benevolent Society, the 
 charity is confined exclusively to the deserving and respectable poor, 
 and the greatest pains are taken to examine into the genuineness of 
 each individual case. 
 
 In all the charitable institutions of the city the halls are adorned 
 with Christmas decorations and preparations made on an extensive 
 scale for the celebration. 
 
 CITY PARKS. 
 
 The Queen's Park is essentially the best in the city, and the Queen 
 street drive is one of its conjunctive attractions. Like all other places 
 in our ancient and beautiful city the children are not permitted as in 
 American cities, to play in the park, but if some crazy jay wishes to 
 shoot off his mouth on some religious question he has full permission 
 to do so except Sunday, and then only such as the Salvation army or 
 some similar organization is permitted to monopolize the Sabbath, 
 This is a very wise by-law, unlike some that the city council passes, as 
 it was, some time ago, Roman Chatholics had to run the risk of being 
 insulted by some half demented fool who thought himself inspired and 
 
Y8 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 specially delegated to preach against that church, that prohibits such 
 exhibitions on Sunday. 
 
 Some time ago when the proposition was before the council to 
 exchange the block of land between Front, Esplanade, Bay and York 
 streets the Telegram made the following caustic observations : 
 
 Toronto's rulers keep its nose so close to the grindstone that the city has seldom time to 
 look into the future. The problems of the present have always been too big for past concillors. 
 American cities with all the dishonesty that has oppressed them have been more fortunate. The 
 future has not been neglected and the elaborate park systems secured when land was cheap 
 outshine the ijarks of Toronto the beautiful. The chance of securing a grand and complete 
 .system of parks has gone or is going by forever. The acres between the university and Bloor 
 street for which |6io,ooo has been offered, are almost in the maiket. The loss of this natural 
 park and plyground, dotted with trees that are the work of a hundred years, would be a mis- 
 fortune, and civic patriotism ought to sacrifice something to avert a loss that cannot be made 
 good within the lifetime of this generation. 
 
 And in connection with the Upper Canada grounds the same 
 journal si./s : 
 
 Toronto oujjht to outbid every private tender and secure the use of the old Upper 
 Canada grounds for the city's children during the summer months. It is a small thing, hut 
 civic statesmanship could auord to stoop to conquer those convenient acres for the use of boys 
 and girls who have no play ground but the street. Spite of high taxes, the city is rich enough to 
 rent the property from the University trustees. The few hundred dollars which it would cost 
 at most, would be a small price for the boon which such a play ground would be to hundreds 
 of children. 
 
 What New York saw in 1851 the Telegram sees to-day for Toronto, 
 and it is certainly to the credit of New York that they have a park 
 which is as free as the air to both rich and poor alike, containing a par- 
 ade grounds of thirty acres for the manceuvering of large bodies of troops, 
 play grounds, base ball grounds, rides, drives, walks and everything 
 that could be invented for the pleasure of its inhabitants. 
 
 During the summer season the council arranges with the different 
 bands to give series of concerts in the parks, and the crowds that attend 
 them outweigh a,ny protestations for or against them, and abundantly 
 testify to their popularity. 
 
 Even Montreal' the principal city of the Province of Quebec, which 
 complacent Christians of Ontario regard as being somewhat benighted 
 can boast of resting places for the weary and heavy laden. You cannot 
 take half an hour's walk in that city but you will come to a square of 
 sufficient dimensions to accommodate a large crowd of people, if they 
 desire to sit down and rest. One Sunday evening I walked through 
 some of these parks, and I fervently thanked God that Toronto did 
 not have any such places. Numberless men, actually smoking and 
 seeming to enjoy it, their wives with them in some cases and children 
 too, all seeniing pleased to be there. They were absolutely enjoying 
 the shade and cool afforded, instead of being at the centetery weeping 
 and wailing over their grandparents' graves. I never saw anything like 
 it. And if that were not bad enough to see the hardworking, common 
 ruck enjoying themselves in this fashion, even the birds seemed to enjoy 
 it too. The sparrows, bathed themselves to their hearts' content in the 
 fountains. They chirped, dove into the water, splashed it all over, flew 
 out again, and had a glorious time, and it was as I watched them that 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 7!> 
 
 the prayer of thankfulness went up from my heart that Toronto had no 
 such places. Can you not imagine, dear reader that frenzy, leading to 
 madness that would have taken possession of the senses of the good 
 souls of Toronto had such a frightful desecration of the Sabbath taken 
 place in that saintly city. Those brutes who enjoyed the breath of 
 fresh air with their wives and children and their pipes would soon have 
 been hustled out of a park in Toronto, and as for the birds, I do not 
 know how many of Toronto's policemen would have been required lo 
 stand in front of those fountains with two edged swords, keeping the 
 little demons away. Had these things occurred in that city, and had 
 the good people i have referred to been powerless to prevent them, 
 imagine if yon can how many of them goaded into madness would have 
 required places in the asylums already full to overilowing, and then 
 think : Did I not have reason to feci thankful that Toronto did not 
 boast of such places ? 
 
 THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 
 
 Toronto stands at the head, and in the front rank of all cities on 
 the continent for the excellence and extent of its system of public schools. 
 The buildings belonging to the public schools are brick, and are amongst 
 the handsomest in the city ; they are commodious in every respect 
 and made equal to the demand upon them. The rooms are large, airy 
 and neat, and the buildings are well warmed and ventilated and every 
 care is taken to render the teachers and pupils as comfortable as possible. 
 The course of study is most thorough, and in the winter months night 
 classes are held and large numbers avail themselves of the opportunity 
 to better their positions ; all these are free. Mr. James L. Hughes is 
 a most thorough inspector, and it is due largely to his excellent mana- 
 gement that the system has reached its present thorough efficiency. 
 
 The number of students attending the universities is very large, 
 and as is customary with spoiled children, the public are very lenient 
 with them. In this connection the Telegram has an article on the 
 subject of attending the Opera House and says : 
 
 Students ought to know enough to stop short of rude interference with the rights of 
 others. It is not to the wild and strange noises with which they decorate the silences of the 
 night that objection is taken. Citizens are anxious that they should have not only liberty but a 
 measure of license. They are allowed to enjoy themselves at the expense of other people's 
 feelings, and public forbearance towards them imposes upon the collegian the duty of respect- 
 ing the sacred rights of fellow-citizens. There was nothing wildly funny in the uproar at the 
 Grand Opera House. Authors of the disturbance did not act fairly towards Manager Sheppard 
 His good nature allows them all the latitude they should ask. He owes something to his other 
 patrons, and he could not allow the boorishness of the gallery to interfere with the fulfillment 
 of his o' ligation to people who go to the theatie to enjoy the performance. Now the students 
 are good Canadians. Individually they are not inconsiderate. The civic by-laws are stretched 
 to the bursting point in order to contribute to their enjoyment. A tax-payer would be jailed 
 for breaches of decorum far less serious than their antics. The public go more than halfway to 
 meet the inclinations of the students. They should cover the short remainder of the distance, 
 for it is not manly in then to take from other people the enjoyment which they pay for. 
 
 In giving an account of the disturbance in question, the same 
 journal adds : 
 
80 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 The students behaved like a lot of blackguards among the gods at the Grand Opera 
 House. They blew horns incessantly during the performance, their uproarious behaviour 
 causing many to leave before the opera was more than lialf finished. Manager Sheppard went 
 up stairs to remonstrate with the rowdies but his threats to ting down the curtain unless they 
 behaved themselves properly, only met with the discordant tooting of a score of tin horns. 
 After leaving the Grand the students organized a procession outside, and marched on the side- 
 walk and roadway about 600 strong, shoving and jostling everyone who would not move aside, 
 At the north-west corner of Yonge and Queen streets one of the mol) collided with F. C. Dodds, 
 and knocked him down. He collared the offender and clung to him while P. C. Welch called 
 up the patrol waggon. At No. 2 police station the prisoner gave his name as Howard Brown, 
 a veterinary student, who had the appearance of being a farmer's son. After the arrest of JJrown. 
 the students continued their wild |)ranks, among the j)laces and prominent persons being 
 serenaded being Bishop Strachan school, William Mulock and the MouUon Ladies college. At 
 the latter institution the young ladies acteil inost indiscreetly in encouraging the students. One 
 of them started to sing a song, but some persons pulled her away from the window. Another 
 lighted matches, while a third threw out a pillow, which the gang promptly picked up, and it 
 served as a banner during the balance of the racket. One the following morning Brown was 
 tried before the Magistrate on a charge of disorderly conduct, and was fined $2, 
 
 Mr. Sheppard who cannot be said to be anything but generous in 
 his treatment of the students was allowed an early opportunity to in- 
 terview the Police Commissioners at their regular forthightly meeting. 
 He complained that there was an insufficiency of police at his place of 
 amusement on the occasion of the students' rumpus. Mr. Sheppard 
 was informed that the police duty ceased at the street line, but if he or 
 anybody acting under his authority wanted any disorderly person 
 ejected he could command the whole police force if necessary. The 
 police would remove any individual pointed out or would turn the 
 whole body of students out if requested to do so. The same orders 
 will apply to all other places of amusement, and it is the intention of 
 the Chief Constable to suppress any repetition of the disgraceful conduct 
 in the theatres in the city. 
 
 The public schools occupy a considerable space in the correspond- 
 ence columns of the city papers, and schools are rapidly becoming 
 what religious societies are supposed to do in their world, — become side 
 tracks for the public to shunt their children upon that others may 
 assume the responsibility, or rather take the responsibility, from their 
 shoulders in bringing them up. In view of the kinder-garten of the 
 present time, the time is not far distant when women will be merely 
 what Harriet Beecher Stowe in Uncle Tom's Cabin describes as 
 " breeders." That is to say they will give birth to the child and they 
 will then expect the State to nurse and educate it. A correspondent 
 on one of the new.spapers recently complained of the lack of ability 
 on the part of modern young women to conk, and a few days later some 
 sweet creature signing herself " One who is interested in the Girls " 
 heartily agreed with the other correspondent, and suggested that cook- 
 ing should be taught in the schools. The idea that girls should learn 
 such things at home did uot seem to occur to her giant intellect. She 
 thought perhaps that modern civilization demands so much of a girl's 
 time, that the limited time she spends at home would be inaquate to 
 allow her to learn to cook. The church, Sunday school, ladies* aid 
 society, class-meeting, W.C.T.U., Young peoples' society of Christian 
 Endeavor, Wednesday night prayer meeting, society for the propogation 
 of American dress amongst the Africans, choir practice, etc., are such 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 81 
 
 drains upon a young woman's time that school is really the only place 
 she would have a chance to learn in. I should like just once to sit down 
 to a meal such as two thirds of the present day young women could 
 cook, and it would do me the rest of my lifetime. 
 
 Nor are they satisfied with having Sunday schools for religious 
 instruction, but they also desire that something should be done in the 
 same way in the day schools. I attended a public school when I was 
 a boy and for a few moments, I, like fifty or sixty others sanctimon- 
 iously turned my eyes heavenward, while that paragon of virtue, who 
 left his position because he could not control his appetite for liquors, 
 read some passages that I never recollect having heard once. That 
 was the law, however, and he complied with it. What more could 
 anyone want ? I have no doubt in the fulness of time that v/omen will 
 expect teachers to nurse their brats even. 
 
 STREET BOYS. 
 
 You can scarcely walk a block without your attention being drawn 
 to one or more of the class called street boys. 
 
 Every morning, rain or shine, summer or winter, a perfect swarm 
 of boys make their appearance at the offices of the different newspapers, 
 and boarding the early cars, they have papers to all parts of the city in 
 time to catch the earliest pedestrian or street railway passenger. The 
 World, on account of its condensed form, has a very large sale amongst 
 those who live in the outskirts of the city, as by the time one reaches 
 the city he is master of the news of the day. But the boys who sell the 
 morning papers are comparatively few in number. The newsdealers 
 control a large amount of this trade, and the efforts of the newsboys 
 centre on the evening papers, lai^e numbers of which are sold all over 
 the city. The great stand for the boys is on the corner of Yonge and 
 King streets, and at the railway stations, where in the mornings you 
 hear the cry " Globe, Mail & Empire, World," while in the evening, 
 •'Globe, Mail & Empire, News, Telegram and Star" is rattled off as their 
 tongues can utter them. Some little fellows, however, of limited capital 
 confine themselves to the Telegram, and at six o'clock the streets are 
 full of little shavers, yelling " six o'clock Telegram." At the time of 
 the Whitechapel horrors, it was a rare harvest for them, and sometimes 
 when there was no Whitechapel murders on the boards, they called it 
 out anyway. These lads are as a rule bright, intelligent little fellows, 
 who would make good and useful men if they got a chance, but some 
 of them are simply stupid. Some of them have no shoes, no coats, and 
 even their shirts are merely apologies for such, and yet they are rarely, 
 if ever, sick ; they can nearly all swin, and enjoy themselves in the 
 summer time, but the cold must necessarily tell upon them in time. 
 Some of the boys live at home, but the majority are wanderers in the 
 streets, selling papers generally, and sometimes forced to beg. In the 
 summer time they can live out all night, but in the winter they are 
 obliged to patronize the cheap lodging houses, the newsboys' home or 
 St. Nicholas home. 
 
82 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Some of the more careful ones have done well, from a financial 
 standpoint. Davy O'Brien, who for years stood at the corner of King 
 and Yonge streets with unfailing regularity,' deposited thirty dollars 
 every two weeks in the Home Savings and Loan Company's office, and 
 in addition thereto, he owns a house and lot on Duchess street, the 
 value of which is at least eighteen hundred dollars. Some time ago 
 when the Mail reduced its subscription price to four dollars in the city, 
 the boys were unable to compete against the office, but the company 
 agreed to sell the morning paper at 25c. a month per copy, if they were 
 paid for in advance, this would be a cent a copy. Davy promptly took 
 the matter up and paid for two hundred and fifty copies in advance 
 each month and then sold them to the other newsboys, at a cent and 
 a half a copy. Other boys have records equally good but which have 
 not so bright a side financially. One young chap who used to stand 
 at the corner of Bay and King streets is now in one of the offices learn- 
 ing to be a pressman. He was a reliable, honourable boy, and those 
 with whom he dealt learned this, and when an opportunity presented 
 itself he was rewarded by an appointment to a vacant apprenticeship. 
 Another is now in the mailing department in one of the city papers. 
 He, likewise proved himself worthy of confidence and received this 
 position. Both of those boys are on the way towards making respect- 
 able and useful citizens. 
 
 In addition to the newsboys proper are also the youths who carry 
 routes for the morning papers. Each paper employs from forty to fifty 
 of these boys, and whiie the remuneration does not exceed two dollars 
 a week, it is quite an item, inasmuch as the majority of the boys work 
 during the day at some other business or go to school. It requires some 
 enterprise and considerable self sacrifice, as they are required to be up 
 at five o'clock in the morning but their work is finished by seven. 
 
 Again there are boys who carry evening papers to subscribers of 
 their own. These are for the most part boys of respectable parentage, 
 and who attend school. They are required to pay for their papers 
 every day, and pay an average of seven cents a dozen, their profit being 
 five cents. Some of these lads make several dollars per week, and have 
 accounts at the savings* banks. They are sure to get along in the world, 
 and their enterprise and pluck demonstrate beyond a doubt theirability 
 to take their places in the battle of life. The boys who carry the 
 morning routes are among the most respectable in the city, and must 
 be of good moral cnaracter. One of the boys employed by one morning 
 paper was the son of the pastor of a most prominent city church. 
 
 A good many of the regular newsboys sell the newspapers in the 
 early morning and black boots part of the day, taking up the news- 
 papers again in the evening. Their ages run from ten to sixteen years. 
 A few are older, and one or two men follow this avocation in the street. 
 A boy provides himself with a box with a sliding lid, and a rest for the 
 feet of his customer, a box of blacking and a pair of good brushes. All 
 these articles are kept in the box, when not in use, and the owner 
 carries this receptacle by menas of a leather strap fastened to it, which 
 
OF TOiiONTO THE GOOD. 83 
 
 he slings across his shoulder and trudges on with his box on his back. 
 They are generally sharp, shrewd lads with any number of bad habits 
 and little or no principles, and are averse to giving much information 
 with respect to themselves ; when asked how much they earn, they give 
 evasive answers, but one dollar is supposed to be the average daily 
 earnings of an industrious boy. The price of a new outfit or kit is 
 pcrhapj worth a dollar, but second hand outfits can be bought at tlie 
 junk dealers for much less. Some of the larger boys spend a consider- 
 able portion of their earnings for tobacco and drink, and they patronize 
 all the theatres, their criticisms of which are really worth hearing, and 
 their imitations or rather mimics of the different comedians are most 
 creditable and put to shame the baser imitations we are obliged to 
 listen to as being original and which we vociferously encore. The 
 course of life which they pursue leads to miserable results, as when a 
 newsboy gets to be seventeen years oi age he finds that his avocation 
 is at an end, it does not produce money enough and he has acquired 
 lazy, listless habits, which totally unfit him for any kind of work. He 
 becomes a vagrant and perhaps worse, and a wanderer all over the 
 country. A boy of seventeen has visited nearly all the large cities of 
 the United States, and the stories they tell vof their experiences in 
 Chicago in particular are absolutely revolting. The crime that bani- 
 shed Lord Somerset from London society is conimitted according to 
 their reports, every night in some of the lodging houses in Chicago. 
 
 Like all matters or people who are compelled to reside in the city> 
 the newsboys are, of course, the special care of that august body, the 
 police force, which sought to tag the boys like dogs, and by consulting 
 the chapter on the police force, you will see the opinions of some of the 
 citizens on the subject. At a meeting held in connection with criminal 
 matters, the following report is taken from a city paper : 
 
 Sir Daniel Wilson thought the prison was no place to send a boy to. Whipping soundly 
 was the best treatment for boys of all classes who were refractory. The badge system of making 
 newsboys register at police headquarters, Sir Daniel thought, would have been quite successful 
 had not the newspapers given their voices against it. The system of compelling boys to go to 
 school for two hours a day had not been thoroughly successful, because the boys left the respect- 
 able lodging houses in order that the police inspectors could not get at them so easily. The 
 badge system must be carried out thoroughly or not at all. Radical were Sir Danial's ideas as 
 to the treatment of adult criminals. " When a man comes to thirty 3'ears of age," he said, " and 
 has been convicted of burglary twice, I think it is ridiculous to look him up for but two years 
 or so, and on the third conviction I would send him to prison indefinitely, for I regard such men 
 as wolves who live to prey on the community." 
 
 I call particular attention to the remarks anent the newsboys, and 
 would say for the information of others that when one of the police 
 officers called at a certain office the clerk who sold the papers did his 
 utmost to make himself as offensive as he possibly could, and declared 
 his intention of selling to every boy or girl who asked for paoers, 
 whether their age was five or fifty. 
 
 " Two members of the police force insulted me one night, and any- 
 thing that I can possibly do to obstruct them in a constitutional way, I 
 purpose doing," he observed in explanation, and suffice to say he kept 
 his word. Any boy, tagged or untagged got all the papers he wanted 
 in that office at least. 
 
84 OF TOHONTO THE (JOOD. 
 
 Other legislation has been passed for the benefit of the boys not 
 necessarily newsboys, but as the boys are row almost restricted to look- 
 ing cross-eyed on the street, and eating their dinners, I give the expres- 
 sions of Saturday Night on the subject of the restrictive legislation 
 proposed for their benefit : 
 
 Only those who have studied criminal procedure can understand what a roaring f:»rce 
 more than half of it is. Only those who iiave watched the discussion in Parliament have the 
 (lintest conception of the vast amount of a surdity which was eliminated during tht discussion. 
 Hanging for sheep stealing was nothing compared with some of the dreadful things proijosed to 
 do to people. Then look at the Cigarette Act, which is intended to correct the habits of the 
 young as regards the use of tobacco. Since Dominion day it has been law in this province that 
 all persons under eighteen years of age are prohibited from buying, using, or having tobacco in 
 their possession, and those who sell or give it to them are liable to heavy fines. They should 
 frame a Spanking Act intended to prevent the squalling of baoies, the chewing of gum and 
 refusal to take the matutinal bath. Enactments should be providei' for the imprisonment of 
 boys who insist on sliding down hill to the detriment of their trouseis, and for the making of 
 dreadful examples of girls who let their stocking sag around their ankles. By proper attention 
 to these domestic details the responsibility of parents may be greatly d creased. All they will 
 have to do shall be to provide nourishment and raiment for their offspring, the policeman will 
 do the rest. What a delightful vista is opened for the coming parent when the Kodak theory 
 of parental responsibility .'s perfected. They will bring the child into the world, the police 
 magistrate will do the rest. 
 
 This is given to demonstrate the absurdity of half of the restrictive 
 legislation passed, and the absurdity of making children, or anyone 
 else for that ma ter, good or virtuous by A>ctof Parliament, and Satur- 
 day Night adds : 
 
 The perfection of public schools has endowed the state with the right of even compulsory 
 education. So far we could not quarrel with the idea of government. Unfortunately so many 
 parents were unable to educate their children or even contribute to their education in a tech- 
 nical sense, that to prevent illiteracy the state was forced to invest itself with proper powers. 
 Following in the wake of this, Sunday schools, imitating the Catholic example, relegated the 
 religious education of the child to what may be called professional teachers. The mother, no 
 longer feeling called upon to tell the sweet story of Christ's sacrifice to the child at her knee, 
 had more time to devote to the designing of new gowns for herself and offspring. The father, 
 relieved of his teaching duties, could spend more time at the club or in that odd mixture of 
 secular and religious work designed to benefit the heathen and extend tbe tenets of his denom- 
 ination. There is a general outcry for more religious teaching in the schools. Even the careless 
 parent is observing that the proxy system has not yet been perfected, that neglect in providing 
 parental precept and example is having its effect. Of course, parents arc not impressed with 
 the idea that tliey ought to do some of this sort of thing t :mseives. They feel that the school- 
 teacher ought to do it, that there is too much long division and too little divinity taught in the 
 schools. The policeman having become the guardian of childish habits with respect to liquor 
 and tobacco, the nursery business should be extended to the Fire Brigade, who could no doubt 
 be profitably employed m their spare moments in washing the knees of the school children and 
 giving dirty little boys their bath before going to bed I think the whole business would be 
 laughable if it were not an innovation of that outrageous and fool idea that good boys and good 
 girls and good men and good women are to be made by statute. 
 
 I wish to point out to those people who so ready to clap a boy or 
 young man into gaol for committing some offence against society that 
 society itself might exert some influence to reclaim these people. I 
 have in my mind one particular case, which is but an example of 
 hundreds. A young chap of eighteen, who had spent three years in the 
 Reformatory, met me one night and asked me for some money. I gave 
 it to him, and he told me part of his history, which I have since 
 followed through the newspapers. He has been in the Central once 
 or twice, and is in prison to-day, I believe. On several occasions I have 
 given him money, and the economical use he would make of it convinces 
 
OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 85 
 
 me that he would have been honest if he could. I have seen him wait 
 around day after day where work was going on, in the hope of being 
 employed. He once walked a distance of forty miles to get employment, 
 and was unsuccessful. Would it not have been better to have some 
 place where such people could go and stay when out of employment, 
 than to run them in as vagrants ? Might not a large share of missioncry 
 money— spent in foreign lands — be better employed in feeding and 
 lodging the outcast ? I was much struck by the explanations of a parcel 
 of Toronto women of some scheme to which they contributed their 
 money. It was to provide for East India Widows ! It made me laugh 
 when I read it. East I' dia widows, Chinese and other Asiatic races 
 having Canadian r^ ^ney spent for their benefit and to teach them a 
 religion they do not want, while boys in Canada who steal because they 
 are starving, are filling our prisons. Singular it is not ? I may possibly 
 be mistaken in regard to the objects of this particular missionary society 
 being the assistance of India widows, but it was something just as ridi- 
 culous, if that were not it. 
 
 The same hysterical asses that live to-day appear to have lived in 
 the times of the immortal Dickens, and I submit an example of his 
 satirical references to foreign missionaries, being from Bleak House : 
 
 Joe is brought in. He is not one of Mrs. Pardiggle's Tockahoopo Indians, he is not one 
 of Mrs. Jellyby's lambs, being wholly unconnected with Hoorioboola Gha, he is not softened by 
 distance and unfamiliarity, he is not a genuine foreign grown savage, he is the ordinary home- 
 made article. Dirty, ugly, disagreable to all the senses in body, a common creature of the 
 common streets, only m soul a heathen. Homely filth begrimes him, homely rags are on him, 
 homely parasites devour him, homely sores are in him, native ignorance the growth of English 
 soil and climate sinks his immortal nature lower than the beasts that perish. Stand forth, Joe, 
 in uncompromising colors. From the sole of thy foot to the crown of^thy head there is nothing 
 nteresting about thee. 
 
 Some time ago Mr. Harry Piper made a practice of taking a cart- 
 load of flowers through the Ward for distribution to the ragged children 
 of poverty there. If I had my choice of a record when I stand before 
 God on the last day, I would far rather it should be as a dispenser of 
 such blessings as Mr. Piper's, or contributions to the newsboys' home, 
 than all the glory of assisting missionaries in foreign countries where 
 they are not wanted, but, of course, it is f.o be remembered that the 
 former get no newspaper mention made of their actions and the latter do. 
 
 When I was on the staff of a newspaper published in this city, a 
 lady come into the office to demand a free advertisement for the meet- 
 ing of her pet missionary society. I took precious good care that she 
 did not get it. That women could go to that newspaper office and with 
 venomous persistency could haggle over the price of an advertisement 
 regarding foreign missions, yet as she swept up the steps of that office 
 she must have passed numerous half starved little newsboys sitting on 
 these same steps who were far better objects for her missionery labors 
 than any foreigners could be, yet I do not doubt, judging from the 
 sneering, venomous-looking mouth and the disposition whose devilish- 
 ness I had a fair example of that day, that this woman would consider 
 herself contaminated had her skirts touched one of the little fellows 
 she had passed. 
 
86 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 THE SOCIAL EVIL. 
 
 In writing upon this subject, which is essentially a part of Toronto, 
 I do so in order to lay before my readers many reasons why the 
 crusade against houses of ill-fame commenced some years ago, has not 
 been a success, and never will be a success, in so far as suppressing the 
 social evil is concerned. In suggesting a system of toleration, as I do, 
 I conscientiously believe that houses of ill-fame are absolutely necess- 
 ary in, not Toronto alone, but every city in America. I reflect public 
 opinion more than any so called public moralist could do simply because 
 I consider myself to be more in touch with the general public than they 
 are. I have tried to prove that suppressing houses of ill-fame is not 
 lessening the evil, it may confine it more amongst respectable people, 
 domestic servants etc., but I think such a state of affairs is far more 
 deplorable than the most open permission of houses would be. Every 
 incident I have given in my work to prove the existence of immorality 
 is absolute truth. It would be an easy matter for me or for anyone else 
 for that matter to give imaginary cases such as I have given here, and 
 declare them to be truth, and I purpose, immediately after this work is 
 completed placing a copy of it in the hands of the Department of the 
 Attorney General of the Province of Ontario, and in that copy I shall 
 number every episode that I have given. Should this Department 
 desire roe to do so, I am prepared to go before any judge, Magistrate 
 or Commissioner and submit to examination under oath and I wil 
 give the names and as far as possible the addresses of the parties 
 whose acts I have portrayed. I know the name of every one whose 
 case is mentioned, and can supply sufficient data for an investigation, 
 should they desire confirmation, I am willing to place myself at the 
 disposal of that Department to assist them in determining as to whether 
 I speak the truth or not. Whatever action they desire to take, I shall 
 always be glad to assist them in it. 
 
 During the progress of the Convention of the World's Womens 
 Christian T. U., the action of Lady Henry Somerset in signing a peti- 
 tion for the re-enactment of the laws that regulate vice in India, was 
 widely discussed and sweepingly condemned. Lady Henry Somerset 
 states that these women "do not know what the conditions of Indian 
 camp life are," and she might have added with equal truth that they 
 know equally little of the manners and customs that prevail amongst the 
 young of both sexes in thispresent year of grace, but she was met with 
 the reply that "we know the ten Commandments and are sure they 
 are suited to every condition of human existence — Anglo-Indian camp 
 life included." 
 
 My impression is that there wasnoi one woman in the entire assem- 
 bly who has a son or a brother who is between the ages of fifteen and 
 twenty years, who has the slightest conception of that boy's private 
 character— I am prepared to go still further and I assert it. When Rev. 
 Wilbur P. Crafts spoke of " Lady Henry Somerset's great practical 
 mistake— a mistake into which many ministers of the United States 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 87 
 
 hjtd also fallen," he acknowledged in addition thereto that the question 
 of the extension of licensing is one that is being discussed and ever 
 present, and that it is "assuming alarming proportions. " He cited a 
 story of the frightful position of a young girl who had adopted the life 
 of prostitution, which was loudly applauded, but the story came from 
 Paris. 
 
 I contend that some system of liceniiing or inspecting should pre- 
 vail in every city in America. I do not think it should be necessary 
 for a girl to express her intention of entering a house of ill- fame, to any 
 official, as I believe is done in Paris, but let a competent physician be 
 attached to the Health Department, and have the sole occupation of 
 visiting houses and examining the inmates as frequently as he considers 
 necessary, and when such inmate is suffering from disease let her be 
 taken to a hospital and be properly treated. Licensing in that case 
 would not be necessary, but every keeper of a house should be com- 
 pelled to have her house registered with the Board of Health, and any 
 not doing so should be punished. In a very short time venereal diseases 
 would be completely stamped out. These hf/uses should not be per- 
 mitted to sell liquor and when the house is charged with being disor- 
 derly, instead of the inmates being punished, the drunken, ill-bred 
 rowdies who do not know enough to conduct themselves as gentlemen 
 anywhere should be the ones to be punished. It is they who are dis- 
 orderly, never the inmates as far as my experience has shown. In the 
 pages following I have endeavoured to show that social purity is not 
 advanced by suppressing houses of ill-fame, everything 1 have stated 
 being absolutely true, and my contention is that people who hold posi- 
 tions as social purists are not in a position to give opinions on such 
 matters, for they are not only entirely ignorant of them, but they are 
 illogical. If the raiding or suppression of houses of ill-fame had the 
 effect of stopping the commission of adultery, there would be no reason 
 for making any plea for them, but I know that it does not, and the 
 testimony I give in these pages shows that it does not. I maintain 
 that the ministers Mr. Crafts speaks of as favouring a system of licen- 
 sing are men who are conversant with the social usages of the present 
 day and know that such places are a necessity. If not licensed let 
 them pay a registration fee entitling them to supervision by the Board 
 of Health. A dozen different means offer themselves by which a sys- 
 tem conducive to public health could be operated. And I fail to see 
 that any of the ten Commandments would be violated, if houses were 
 allowed to register at the Health Department, and a physician deputed 
 to make a thorough examination of the inmates of such houses. 
 
 In support of my contention that the people representing social 
 purity are illogical, let me say : The Report of one Committee contained 
 the information that they had conserved public morality by having the 
 age of consent raised in certain states in the Union. In the final set 
 of resolutions, enfranchisement is demanded for women. Are not these 
 circumstances somewhat inconsistent ? Women demand the ballot be- 
 cause they consider themselves men's equals mentally. If this be so, 
 
88 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 why do they require any age of consent at all ? I can only deduce that 
 they are not entitled to the ballot as being men's equals, if they require 
 an age of consent. If, however, they are men's equals let us agree for 
 argument's sake, and they demand an age of consent, is not that an 
 acknowledgement of the natural depavity of their own sex ? I should 
 be sorry to think this so, but I hold that it is the only logical deduction 
 that can be made. But I have elsewhere tried to show that raising the 
 age of consent does not act as a preventive. 
 
 As an evidence that the authorities acknowledge that some system 
 is required, in February 1898, at Montreal, at the conference between 
 Archibishop Bruchesi, Bishop Bond, Judge Desnoyers, Recorder De- 
 Montigny and Mr. E. L. Bond, president of the Citizens* League, it was 
 decided to go before the new City Council, and ask that houses of ill- 
 fame and inmates be examined every week ; any found not following 
 certain regulations to be promptly suppressed. 
 
 I think the gentlemen above named are quite as competent to 
 deal with social evils as any body of men or women in the world. 
 
 Of the houses of the first-class in Toronto those that once had a 
 national reputation as such, are now no more, but their successors have 
 sprung up in different parts of the city. At one time among the most 
 prominent were 248 Front street west, 104 Richmond street west, and 
 one on Albert street, the number of which I have forgotten, besides the 
 house on the corner of Sheppard and Adelaide streets. These places 
 were, I think I can truthfully say, always quiet, and no one, not know- 
 ing their character would ever guess it from outside appearances. They 
 were patronized by wealthy men, young ^nd old, from every part of 
 the city and country. Take particularly the case of the house on the 
 corner of Shepparjd and Adelaide streets, it was always kept carefully 
 closed, the blinds were drawn and the place was as silent as the tomb. 
 After some years, having this reputation, it finally changed hands, and 
 it is a circumstance worth mentioning that nearly all the boarding 
 houses in that vicinity have since lost caste, and the*'r patronage is of 
 the worst class, while the house itself has undergone repair, and has 
 had a dozen different tenants since is inception to respectability by the 
 owner, who, I have no doubt, has frequently wished he had left it alone. 
 No one appears to stay in it, and it is consequently idle half the time. 
 
 In houses of this class the furniture is elegant and tasteful, and the 
 proprietress is usually a middle aged women of good personal appear- 
 ance, the inmates being generally young women in the prime of life or 
 between twenty and thirty. " My young ladies," I once heard a pro- 
 prietress call her girls. These girls are carefully chosen for their beauty 
 and charms, and are frequently persons of education and refinement. 
 They are required to observe the utmost decorum in the parlors of the 
 house, until you are fairly well acquainted with them, and then their 
 language is not so polite. Their loilettes are usually extremely aesthetic 
 and voluptuous, and display their charms to the best advantage. They 
 rarely make acquaintances on the street, and indeed have no occasion 
 to do so, and it may be said of some of them that they are women of 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 89 
 
 respectable origin, and are sometimes the wives and daughters of men 
 of good social position. Some have been led astray, some adopt this life 
 to avoid poverty, some have entered from motives of extravagance and 
 vanity, while the great majority have entered from motives of pure 
 licentiousness and at the same time gratify a taste for an easy life. But 
 whatever may be the cause, the effect is patent to all — that some of 
 these places contain women who are fitted to grace the best circles of 
 social life. In entering these houses, women believe they will always 
 be able to keep themselves amongst the best classes of such females. 
 They are soon undeceived, however, they remain in a first class house 
 only so long as their charms continue, and as soon as these begin to 
 wear, they are obliged to leave and their descent is rapid, until they 
 become the inmates of the houses on Centre street and its adjacents, 
 where they sometimes die, or more frequently leave the city to enter 
 some of the dens such as exist on Canal street, Buffalo, or other Ame- 
 rican cities, where nearly all are habitual drunkards, and are almost 
 putrified with venereal diseases. 
 
 The question is frequently asked " where do these girls come from ?'* 
 and it would be an extremely difficult one to answer. I know of many 
 instances where girls have been employed as domestic servants and 
 seduced by their male friends, which eventually leads them to take up 
 this life to hide their shame in some cases, and in others to be better 
 able to receive the guilty attentions of a lover. 
 
 It is a matter for congratulation that Toronto is free apparently 
 from the pervading evil of New York, but there are numerous instances, 
 and I am assured that they are on the increase, where girls have gone 
 astray in the effort to keep themselves on the small salaries paid to 
 them, by yielding merely to a passive sin. These cases are, however, 
 carefully kept from the public, though many young men assert that the 
 evil is so great that if its extent were known it would be like a revela- 
 tion. I know nothing from actual experience, however. But it is to 
 be remembered, that as Mrs. Bcsant says, a girl has this advantage 
 over a boy, she can sell herself, where a boy cannot, so that where 
 poverty makes a girl a prostitute, it make? a boy a thief. 
 
 I do not consider, that I am in any respect promulgating the evil 
 when I suggest tolerating, licensing or inspecting houses of ill-fame, 
 and I do not hesitate to say that if a majority of men had their way, 
 it would prevail as it does in Paris, and as I believe it does in every 
 European country but England. England, the United States and 
 Canada, however, would, perhaps, consider such a system a frightful 
 outrage, yet England has ^^roduced a Somerset and an Oscar Wilde, 
 and by a cable telegram in the Montreal vStar of the I2th of April 1897, 
 it is stated that blackmailing operations are carried on on an appalling 
 scale by a gang, the victims being persons of wealth and high standing, 
 whose frightful obliquities are presumed to be the same as Oscar Wilde's. 
 Moreover, I can take you to places in New York and Chicago, where 
 acts of the most appalling bestiality are committed, of so vile a nature 
 that the English language does not supply words to express them, and 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 in comparison with which the inmate of a house of ill-fame might con- 
 sider herself almost saintly. The record of crime in the Report of Chief 
 of Police of Toronto says : indecent assault, 8 ; rape, 9. 
 
 If saintly Canadians run away with the idea that there are no 
 sinners of Oscar Wilde's type in Canada, my regard for truth impels me 
 to undeceive them. Consult some of the bell boys of the large hotels 
 in Canada's leading cities, as I did, and find out what they can tell from 
 their own experiences. A youth of eighteen once informed me that he 
 had blackmailed one of Canada's esteemed judiciary out of a modest 
 sum of money, by catching him in the act of indecently assaulting one 
 of the bell boys connected with a hotel in that city. The judge, with 
 unblushing effrontery had arranged with the boy to meet him outside 
 that night, and the boy had told the blackmailer when and where they 
 were to meet. His honour was highly indignanc and threatened every 
 possible punishment, but it would not do. He had to pay the money. 
 This is one case only, but they are countless. Some of Canada's lead- 
 ing citizens could be implicated just as Oscar Wilde was implicated, if 
 some of these bell boys chose to make public what they knew. I know 
 two different merchants in the city of Toronto who have a similar 
 reputation. It was told me by a young man in Toronto some time ago 
 that one of these characters was attending a church social, and upon 
 seeing a boy of probably 16 or 17 go outside followed him and tried to 
 indecently assault him. The boy refused, and the man I believe, threw 
 him down. It cost him his gold watch and chain and all the money he 
 had upon him to keep the boy's mouth shut. My informant also stated 
 that some friends cf his, who knew about this man, saw him standing 
 on the street corner one night when they made it up to try him. All 
 the crowd left apparently, except one boy, for home. In ten minutes 
 this man came to the lad and made him an indecent proposal. Both 
 these men are so well known in Toronto that there is scarcely a boy 
 who does not know of their reputation. I have no doubt that, notwith- 
 standing the positions they occupy, both would be punished to the full 
 extent of the law, could the police catch them. But this fact serves to 
 demonstrate how little is actually known to the police of what is taking 
 place almost under their very noses, while these very men and their acts 
 of indecency are the talk of boys all over the city. 
 
 Where under heaven people ever learned such appalling things 
 God only knows, and humanity can only conjecture that the people in 
 the places I mention appeal to the degraded tastes of their patrons 
 simply because they are paid for it. The acts in themselves are indes- 
 cribable. Houses of ill-fame are blots on the morality of a country, 
 not necessarily because adultery is a sin, but because everyone knows 
 of them, and the fact of their being public is what constitutes the sin, 
 because sin, as far as my observation has carried me, is only sin when 
 it is found out. These other places are not usually known to the public, 
 and consequently they thrive, and no effort is made to suppress them, 
 as far as I am aware. In the majority of American cities houses are 
 tolerated, and 1 do not see that these cities are any the worse for it. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 91 
 
 During the sitting of the Lexow Committee in New York, did not 
 one of the police inspectors state that he considered houses of ill-fame 
 an absolute necessity, and say that he would far rather have his son 
 visit such a place tha i that he should ultimately become the inmate of 
 an insane asylum ? 
 
 A contention such as the stafi" inspector makes below is absurd on 
 its face. Men and boys of the highest respectability and some whose 
 social positions would preclude them from even noticing a man in the 
 inspector's position visit houses of ill-fame and meet women on the 
 streets, who would as soon think of committing burglary, larceny, or 
 associating with burglars as they would of committing suicide. The two 
 degrees are not at all comparable. 
 
 In tlie city of Montreal houses are not licensed, but they appear 
 to be tolerated, and as long as thv; keepers do not sell liquor or their 
 houses do not become a nuisance to the neighbours, they are not 
 molested, and I fail to see that the morals of the people are any worse 
 than those of the people of the city of Toronto. I state that I have 
 never yet been solicited on the streets of Montreal during a twelve 
 months' residence in that city, and I state that I have been solicited on 
 the streets of Toronto if I am in that city only one night. I do not 
 mean to say that women stop me on the street, but every man or boy 
 knows that soliciting can be done without a word being spokenj and that 
 is the way I have been solicited in the city of Toronto. 
 
 I think I may truthfully and consistently say that there is in the 
 majority of men and boys an inherent chivalry that impels them to 
 refrain from the seduction of respectable girls, and i i preference thereto 
 would visit a house of ill-fame. I also state that in a great many of 
 cases girls are more to blame than boys, and I could give scores of in- 
 stances where such is the case, so that my contention that licensing 
 houses would not in any respect increase the evil, but really be the 
 salvation of girls who are presumably respectable, but who are not really 
 virtuous. The staff-inspector, I believe, states «hat he would just as 
 soon license burglars, &c., as license houses of ill-repute, but it maybe 
 stated that if the intelligence of the stafit-inspector is judged by this 
 remark his opinions need not carry much weight, and at the same time, 
 it is to be remembered that he might very possibly be out of a situation. 
 The following is an opinion expressed by Dr. Sheard at a public meeting : 
 
 Our morality department is a standing disgrace to the city. Look at it a whole staff of 
 officials whose principal duty seems to lie in tagging news-boys. Where else do you find such 
 a system ? I am informed that the officials of this department spend their time knocking at 
 houses in the ward at all hours, wanting to know who is there, and what they are doing. If the 
 result was satisfactory we might stand the expenditure. But if the result is to scatter through- 
 out the city characters who ought never to be here, we are wasting our money. — Applause. 
 
 In giving utterance to these remarks I do not think Dr. Sheard 
 can be accused of having any ulterior motive, such as might possibly be 
 laid to my charge, but his opinion coincides with my contention in so 
 far as the questionable results of raiding are concerned. I do not for 
 one moment believe that there is a prostitute less in Toronto than there 
 ever was. It may be that there are certain houses in the city that were 
 
92 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 at one time known as disreputable, and are now vacant, but that the 
 inmates have left the city is not likely, the contention of the staff in- 
 spector to the contrary, notwithstanding. My intention was called some 
 time ago to the evidence of the aforesaid inspector before the Commis- 
 sioners reporting on the reformatory and prison systems, in which he 
 is alleged to have saiu : 
 
 When I was appointed to this work six years ago, I made an unofficial visit to the houses 
 of ill-fame that then existed, accompanied by two other officeis. I visited thirty-five houses 
 known to be houses of ill-fame. I found on an average four wcnen in each house, and 1 found 
 that two-thirds of this number were Americans. I took the name, age, nationality and length 
 of time t hat they were in this kind of life and I compiled a book containing the information. I 
 pave them distinctly to understand that the law for the suppression of vice and houses of iil-fame 
 in Toronto was to be rigourouslv enforced. I told them that a reasonable time would be given 
 to those who belonged to the otder side to go back there, and that if they had not the means to 
 enable them to do so, we would furnish them with tickets to the places they came from. I 
 further told them that if any of them showed a desire to reform I would send them to an insti- 
 tution under the charge of philanthropic ladies who would see that they were provided with all 
 proper facilities for starting a new life. On my second visit I found that half the number had 
 disappeared altogether. I was told by the officers on duty that they went in large numbers with 
 their trunks to the station, and took tickets for the other side. The law has ocen strictly en- 
 forced from that day to this, and the number of houses of ill-fame in Toronto has been reduced 
 to a minimum, the women that are to be found in these houses are very few, and there is more 
 trouble with the class of women who have become completely demoralized and have to be 
 picked up as drunks and for soliciting on the streets. 
 
 So far as this evidence is concerned I have nothing to say in regard 
 to its truthfulness, it being usually polite to say that a man has made a 
 mistake, but I feel constrained to observe that if the women, who, he 
 alleges, left the city, did so, it appears to me that their places have 
 been very rapidly filled up, or else others have joined our shores to make 
 up for them. It may be that certain houses have been closed by pla- 
 cing policemen at their doors, such as I know was done at 104 Rich- 
 mond, but that other houses have taken their places is equally certain, 
 and the keepers are more careful is the difference. An incident in point 
 will make my meaning clearer. Three girls kept a house on Seaton 
 street for three months, three or four days before their month was up 
 they informed their gentlemen callers that they were going to move 
 to another street, giving the full address, and they kept up this system 
 for nearly a year, at which time I left the city. This I know to be so, 
 I was there. But one thing hapened, worthy of mention. On the"^ry 
 day after they had left Seaton street I am informed that the police 
 raided the house, receiving for their labour an empty tenement. 
 
 It seems to me a ver> singular matter that the staff mspector should 
 make such assertions in the face of the following from the Chief Con- 
 stable's report : 
 
 The number of houses of ill-fame reported in 1894 was 174 and in 1895, 46. The chief 
 says: " Regularly established houses of prostitution seem less numerous ; the competition from 
 women living singly so as not to come within the scope in the law may be one explanation of the 
 cause. Frequenters of houses of ill-fame do not relish the possible visitation of the police, and 
 avoid those places likely to be raided. Solicitation on the street is not rife, though loose women 
 are to be seen on the thoroughfares after nightfall." 
 
 I respectfully submit the following for your consideration and ask 
 an unprejudiced public to judge between my assertion and these of the 
 staff Inspector : 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 98 
 
 Fanny Rogers pleaded guilty to a case of illegal liquor selling at her place on King street 
 west, and his Worship remandedherfor a week, at tne request of her counsel, to consider what 
 sentence he should impose. This is the case, where several lawyers were found in the place 
 when it was raided One of the police said, (hat Miss Rogers was induced to plead guilty so as 
 the legal lights in question would not have to be called by the Crown to testify. 
 
 I have acknowledged that some of these houses have been closed, 
 but I do not believe that the evil is in any respect reduced, in fact quite 
 the reverse is the case. I wish to call attention to the subjoined heroics 
 which appeared in the Empire, demonstrating the truth of my assertion, 
 and while the actual statements are undeniably correct, the conclusions 
 will doubtless strike the average reader as being so much sentimental 
 rubbish. It is stated that " girls in their innocence and youth " are 
 beguiled into returning to the city in boats belonging to their male 
 friends, and are ruined. I don't believe any such nonsence. If the 
 writer who is probably some school-boy let loose, had said that the 
 great or overwelming majority of girls go over to the island *'or that 
 very express purpose, he would be correct in ninety cases out of a 
 hundred when girls go unaccompanied by their parents. The case of 
 the school teacher, who was also *' ruined " is laid at the door of the 
 young man who seduced her. For my own part, I am constrained to 
 believe that she was an extremely willing victim, and do not, in fact 
 consider it a case of seduction at all, it is simply an act of fornication 
 in which one is guilty equally with the other. This appears to be the 
 only case that has obtained publicity, yet I know of several that hap- 
 pened in the cases of the school teachers, and I cannot agree in good 
 conscience that young men should shoulder all the blame. Could any 
 sensible girl or young woman, and more especially a school teacher, who 
 would be supposed to have more than the average intelligence, expect 
 anything else when they make haphazard acquaintances with gentle- 
 men they know nothing at all about ? I do not doubt that the parties 
 in question became acquainted in the usual fashion of people who meet 
 on the street, in the parks, or on the island, and one would imagine that 
 this teacher would know better. I have the histories of several school 
 teachers who attended that convention, and know at least five who were 
 guilty of this sin with young men in the city, and I know moreover of 
 a large number of normalite teachers, or pupils, I suppose they are 
 called when attending the normal school, who have been guilty of similar 
 offences with young men who boarded in the houses with them, and 
 with other also. The following, however is the article under discussion, 
 and you can make your own deductions, both as regards the teachers 
 and others who are therein referred to : 
 
 Nowadays a man who owns or rents a boathouse on the lake front is liable to have his 
 motives for occupying such a place questioned and especially is this the case if he goes to the 
 trouble of fixing ip his aquatic possession to the extent of putting in a few articles of furniture 
 as a sofa, a couple of canvas lounging chairs and furnishings of that sort. If such a thing as a 
 camp bed is to be found within the walls of his boathouse his friends usually eye each other quiz- 
 lically on discovering it. But perhaps the recent revelation of lakeside impropriety and immor- 
 ality justify the raised eyebrow and the ready innuendo with which the captious friend surveys 
 these things. 
 
 Of late there has been much to complain of on the part of the many good people who 
 make the lakeside their home during the summer months. The conduct of certain of their 
 neighbours have been such as to bring discredit on the whole system of boathouse renting and 
 
94 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 livinft, and the Empire in setting out to expose a syHteni of immorality as widespread as it is 
 flagrant has met with much opposition from people who are more or less interested in keeping 
 thinps quiet. One man said : " If you show this practice up you wil! hurt a good many good 
 men who wont thank you at all. While the immorality is doubtless of wide extent and to be greatly 
 regretted it is to a certain extent an almost necessary evil, or an unpicventable one in a city as 
 large as Tnionto. There is not a doubt that the police are fully cognizant of the vice and are 
 doing all in their power to check it." 
 
 Many Explanade men were spoken to, and one of them, a gentleman who is a large pro- 
 perfy owner said : " We would be very glad to get a stop put to the evil, ;is it often keeps 
 respectable people away who would otherwise be good tenants for boathouses, but the more 
 difificultie.s we put in the way of these men the more they exercise their ingenuity to thwart us 
 and nullify our efforts to keep the lake front respectable — on the principle, I suppose, that stolen 
 fruit is sweetest." 
 
 The boat houses in the vicinity of York street arc perhaps the most used for immoral 
 purposes, or rather there are more in that district to wh/ch the public finger of scorn is pointed. 
 Originally boat houses were put up with the idea of renting them to people who possessed boats 
 and simply to accommodate boats. Then as there are thousands of men in the city who live in 
 boarding houses and who possess a boat, it was thought that a boat house roomy enough to 
 allow of a sofa being set in it, or one having a living room above would rent more easily. The 
 idea was a splendid one, and the boat houses with living rooms were speedily taken. Charmeci 
 with the thought of saving big lodging bills during the summer months, dining restaurants oi 
 cooking al fresco meals themselves, many young men in receipt of goodly salaries as a rule 
 jumped at the chance there off'red them of becoming lakeside residents, and possessing an 
 apartment where they could enjoy the cool of the evenmg. It goes without saying that many of 
 the renters of these houses were actuated by baser motives. It was only intended that these 
 houses would be occupied in summer, and for that reason they are as a rule rather airy. The 
 furnishing ot many of these must have cost the occupants many perplexing moments, eleg- 
 antly papered and luxuriously finished several of these little lakeside houses are models of eosy 
 comfort. Asa rule, however, the houses upon whose adornment the owners have spent much 
 money bear the best reputations and anything which transpires in them is never or rarely heard. 
 The freedom from interference leaves these lakeside lodgers at liberty to invite their friends 
 into their premises and if these friends are women of the lowest class, who can interfere I Who 
 is to judge if they are immoral ? The police have tried to interfere with notorious cases, but 
 they cannot legally do so even if they assnme the power by reason of the improbability of the 
 evil-doors taking legal redress, and thus making themselves notorious. Time and again have 
 women of the town been warned off the wharf adjoining several of the boat houses, and they are 
 liable to arrest for trespossing any time they are found on a wharf which is enclosed. But there 
 is no power in Cai.ada which can go into a man's private apartment and drag his friends out, 
 be they high or low In the case of one boat company a circular was issued to the tenants 
 when the property was bought asking their co-operation in maintaining the good name of the 
 premises, but this had not been responded to by several of the boat house occupants. Last year 
 one man carried en the practice of bringing in the most notorious prostitutes in the city so 
 openly that his neighbours reported the matter to the police, who visited the boat house — 
 *• raided " it in fact — but rothing came of the matter. Almost all of the lodgers are provided 
 with a flask or two of whiskey in case of chills, but no great amount of intoxicating liquor is kept. 
 The class of people who rent these boat houses are as a rule well-paid clerks. According 
 to their means they furnish their abodes. The majority content themselves with an imitation of 
 camp life. A boat house is cheaper, handier and safer when wanted only for immoral purposes 
 than a room up town. Although many of the women who visit these places are streetwalkers, 
 the large majority people hear stories about are shop girls who go to the island and there 
 they fi 11 into the hands of some human hound who is looking for some innoc nt girl to entrap. 
 These innocent girls are badgered into an acquaintance, and their male friends finally prevail 
 upon them to set out for the city in their row boats instead of by the ferry boats, but the confid- 
 ing girl whose youth and innocence have induced her to accept the invitation of the fellow who 
 looks with lecherous eyes on her does not land where she desires. The boat draws up in front 
 of the boat house where her courtier hangs forth, and she is induced by specious reasons to 
 enter his net The innocent girl has reason to regret this ill-advised step in most cases. She seldom 
 leaves the place without having taken a drink of liquor, and if she refuses that and all the 
 advances of the individual who has been so successful in getting her inside his boat hous^ she 
 leaves the place with a scarlet face, and has to run the gauntlet of curious eyes. ^Theie meetings 
 are never of a loud character as the prime requisite is quietness. There are no such affairs as 
 night orgies with women present, as the police would quickly interfere. But while there is much 
 to deplore in regard lo boat houses, the piercentage of disreputable houses is very small, and 
 the overwhelming r.ass of house owners and occupants are men who have no thought of wrong 
 doing. But ^hen it is stated that there are four houses notorious for immorality within a 
 hundred yards of one part of the esplanade, it can be easily seen that these remarks are not 
 over-drawn. There are other houses about which stories are told but the quarters mentioned 
 are known far and wide. 
 
OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 95 
 
 The foregoing statements are not secrets by any means. For a long time the police have 
 known of the prevalence of the practice referred to, and are not slow in acknowledging their 
 inability to cope v>'ith it. " These young men are safe from police interference " said one man, 
 " and they know it well." The only thing the police ould do is being done, and that is. the 
 men on duty along the esplanade have instructions to endeavour to stop the practice as much 
 as possible. If a woman is found around a boat house at an unsea.sonable hour she is interrogated 
 and if she cannot give a satisfactory account of uv.>-8elf she is arrested as a vagrant. But this 
 does not cover the case at all, as the principal frequenters of these places are young women 
 who do not loider in the vicinity. When women come down to spend ihe evening or night, 
 they are usually accompanied by the person who keeps the boat house they are bound for, and 
 as a rule the neighbourhood does not become cognizant of the fact till the night wears on. v 
 polic« officer remarked yesterday that it is usual to see lights burning at all hours of the night 
 in suspected houses, and the thing is so well understood oy the force that no nntic« is taken 
 of theni. 
 
 A couple of brothers now bearing a v^ry unenviable reputation in consequence of the 
 seduction of a young girl named Sadie Lavelle who died a few days ago on Terauley street, 
 have the identical boat house hired by the man who first brought boat houses into disrepute. 
 These brothers, one of whom ruined Miss Lavelle in his boat house, are cordially detested by 
 their lakeside neighbours, one of whom yesterday said : " Those boys should be shot on 
 sight. They have seduced more girls than any other two men in the city. Boat house owners 
 would uphold you in showing up such people, as they would be pleased to get rid of them." 
 
 It is hard to get hold of incidents which show the prevalence of the immorality which is 
 admitted. There is a sort of ftemasonry among the culprits which it is next to impossible to 
 break through, but several very damaging stories leaked out. The wife of a well known citizen 
 made a visit to the lake front a few nights since, and while in a boat house with her paramour 
 she had a I55 diamond ring stolen. 
 
 A pitiable story is told about the ruin of a young lady teacher by one of the boat house 
 libertines. She was in the city during the N.P. A. convention and was induced to go for a row by 
 her seducer, who landed at his own boat house. She was a bewitching little beauty, and her 
 betrayer was heard to boast of his dastardly act after she had left the city. 
 
 This is only a modified form of what really (ixists. Boat house are 
 the special privilege of young men and boys, and girls and prostitutes 
 are taken there with a frequency that is surprising. An incident in 
 which a lad of sixteen or seventeen who was employed in the Musee, 
 was arrested for taking a girl to a boat house, is doubtless still fresh in 
 the minds of the public, and though he was threatened with all the 
 thunders of the Morality Department, to his everlasting credit be it said 
 he made a most plucky defence, and showed that he did not come 
 within the meaning of the seduction act, although he was informed, 
 after being discharged, that it was in the power of the magistrate to 
 send him to the penitentiary — which I take the liberty of disbelieving. 
 
 In addition to the boat houses, over a large number of stores all 
 over the city, there are scores of young men who rent rooms and furnish 
 them for no other purpose. When a friend requires the room it is 
 loaned with perfect good grace, and the occupant feels, as he is, free 
 from interruption. This method of carrying on the evil is on the in- 
 crease, and its results are for more disastrous than licensed houses of 
 ill-fame would be, for girls of a more respectable social status, frequently 
 those of very respectable parents, in some cases school girls, do not 
 hesitate to go to a room where they are not known and where there is 
 no danger of interference, and young men who would frequent a house 
 of ill-fame, were it not for fear of being brought before the magistrate, 
 have little scruple in bringing a girl to a place of this kind. This is 
 at least significant : 
 
 One or two furnished rooms to be sold cheap, immediate possession, public building, 
 central, privileges, low rent. Box 279, News. 
 
 A furnished room for sale, in public building, no questions asked. Box 529, Telegram. 
 Wanted — Nice, warm room, no questions asked. Box 612 Telegram. 
 
96 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 In the summer time the parks and the island are favourite resorts 
 for girls and women to meet their lovers and seek for custom. On 
 Centre avenue where the girls used to stand in the door- way to solicit 
 the passers by, boys were always ready and willing to give the alarm 
 on the approach of a policeman, and the doors were closed and bolted 
 until the way was clear again, and the girls would then come out, only 
 to repeat the same thing over and over again, and the numbers who 
 visited these haunts low as they were, were reputed to be legion. Very 
 few young men regard it as sinful to visit a house of ill-repute the only 
 restraint is the fear of the police, and contagious disease, consequently 
 when fate throws in his way a girl who is presumably virtuous, there is 
 really very little danger in a mutual sin. The girl will assuredly keep 
 it a secret from pride and the young man will tell no one but his most 
 intimate friends, who may, perhaps enjoy the same relations as he, and 
 most important of all there is no danger. Hence there must be a 
 premium on such acts. 
 
 It is Mr. Monk, in Oliver Twist who says there is one secret a 
 woman will always keep until it is found out — the loss of her own good 
 name, and they have a saying at the Palais de Justice in Paris that to 
 expect a confession from a woman is like attempting tc make the devil 
 confess. 
 
 Edmund Burke, it was, who said, at the close of his indignant 
 outburst in memory of the fallen queen of France, that " vice itself 
 loses half its evil, by losing all its grossness," but I incline to the doc- 
 trine of Collier, who said that the vice which is draped in the garb of 
 virtue or has the varnish of an outward refinement laid over its leprosy 
 is tenfold more infectious and destructive than the shameless wicked- 
 ness which hides its loathsome front. These are the differences 
 between our times and the times of Charles the II, and when it may 
 be demanded and justly so, perhaps, on what grounds I base my 
 claims to have houses licensed, I state that girls who are supposed to 
 be respectable are made to take the places of those who would be 
 visited were it not for fear of the police, but that the Commandment, 
 " Thou shalt not " is broken any the less, I do not believe, and that 
 the vice that has " the varnish of an outward refinement " is frightfully 
 common, I shall try to prove. 
 
 The Reverend Father D^carie, of St. Henri, says that the extent 
 of the nation's immorality ' cannot in any wise be measured by the 
 numbers of the frequenters of disorderly houses. The many lying-in 
 hospitals and institutions for the reception of illegitimate children tell 
 but a portion of the story, and it is probable that the immorality that 
 produced such results, widespread though it may be, is remarkably 
 limited in comparison with that which escapes detection. In the upper 
 circles of Canadian society, there is, to say the least, an immense 
 amount of indiscretion on the part of wives and mothers of families, 
 and it is becoming noticeable that there are married ladies, and single 
 ladies who are no longer young, who receive a larger share of attention 
 from youthful admirers than their younger and unmarried sisters and 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 97 
 
 friends. Among the lower classes the evil is much more extensive, 
 principally among factory girls and domestic servants. 'I'hese generally 
 furnish the subject for the procuresses who periodically visit the country 
 from Chicago and elsewhere. The hospital of the Sacr^ Cceur, at St. 
 Sauveur, near Quebec, which is in charge of nuns, has recently had to 
 be enlarged, though a large five story building. It is a home for 
 foundlings, who are received nightly in a basket placed at the door, 
 where those who bring them, deposit them without fear of discovery, 
 and leave them to the care of the sisters, after ringing a bell to 
 announce the advent of a new arrival. Such is Father D^carie's 
 picture, and a despatch from Toronto to the Montreal Star, dated 
 April 15th, states that the fourth deserted baby found within the pre- 
 ceding two weeks was picked up the previous evening on the doorstep 
 of Sergeant Vaughan's house, on Classic Avenue. The child which 
 was a boy about three weeks old, was taken to the Infant's Home, 
 making a total of 85 infants placed in that institution thus far that 
 year. 
 
 The News stated in a recent issue that " 500 babies know not a 
 mother's love. That number of babies abandoned in Toronto every 
 year." And again the same paper said : " Starve babies for $10. Child 
 murder fearfully prevalent in Toronto the Good. Horrible revelations. 
 Mrs. Boultbee speaks of the evils of maternity houses to the Board of 
 Health." So, of course, there is no commission of sin in Toronto, as 
 the foregoing abundantly proves. Of course not. 
 
 A young man of my acquaintance who is about 22 years of age, 
 stated that the first time he had ever broken the seventh command- 
 ment was through a married woman. She was then about 26 and he 
 was 16. He did not tell me the woman's name, but he pointed her 
 out to me on the street. He was sent to her house on a message, and 
 after inviting him into the house, made the proposition to him, which 
 he indignantly refused, and demanded to be allowed to return home. 
 To this the woman would not consent. She detained him for over an 
 hour and he fell. Are such cases common ? Father Decarie says they 
 are. 
 
 Some time ago I attended a ball in Toronto which was attended 
 by Toronto's highest social circles. A lady, one of the handsomest in 
 the room, was invariably claimed by some youth for a dance. I men- 
 tioned to a friend of mine that I would not care to be the lady's hus- 
 band, and was told that my mind was evil. Her husband, a wealtl\y 
 man, has, I may mention, since applied for divorce on the ground of 
 adultery. My mind may be evil, but I know that Results flow from 
 Causes. This was probably one of that numerous class of women one 
 meets with who would probably tell her husband if he expostulated 
 with her that these young men were nice boys. 
 
 I do not pretend that to tolerate houses of ill-fame, will in any 
 respect, condone the sin of the man who visits one, or render his res- 
 ponsibility to his maker less, yet I do say in all sincerity that it would 
 be better than the system that prevails to-day. 
 
98 • OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 I have given you actual statements of cases that have happened, 
 and on these I base my contentions, and how absurd it must seem that 
 any man can truthfully state that these things do not exist. 
 
 When I suggest the licensing or inspecting of houses of ill-fame, 
 I have to say that we are face to face with a condition and not a 
 theory. If the Scriptures speak the truth, and there is no doubt of 
 that, happily, it will be remembered that though we are specially 
 warned against the women of lewd character, the passage acknowledges 
 their existence, and I give it word for word : 
 
 9. In the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night : 
 
 10. And, behold, there met him a woman with 1 he attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart 
 
 11. (She is loud and stubborn ; her feet abide not in her house : 
 
 12. Now is she without, now in the streets, and lieth in wait at every corner.) 
 
 13. S > she caught him, and kissed him, and with an impudent face said unto him, 
 
 14. / have peace offerings with me ; this day have I payed my vows. 
 
 15. Therefore came I forth to meet thee, diligently to seek thy face, and I have found thee. 
 i6 I have decked my bed with coverings of tapestry, with carved worts, with fine linen 
 
 of Egypt. 
 
 17. I have perfumed my bed with myrrh, aloes, and cinnamon. 
 
 18. Come, let us take our fill of love until the morning ; let us solace ourselves with loves. 
 
 19. For the goodman is not at home, he is gone a long journey : 
 
 20. He hath taken a bag of money with him, <iM,f will come home at the day appointed. 
 
 21. With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she 
 forced him. 
 
 22. He goeth after her straightway, as an ox goeth to the slaughter, or as a fool to the 
 correction of the stocks ; 
 
 23. Till a dart btrike through his liver ; as a bird hasteth to the snare, and knoweth not 
 that it is for his life. * 
 
 24. ^ Hearken unto me now therefore, O ye children, and attend to the words of my mouth. 
 
 25. Let not thine heart decline to her ways, go not astray in her paths. 
 
 26. For she hath cast down many wounded : yea, many strong men have been slain by her. 
 27 Her house is the way to hell, going down to the chambers of death. 
 
 This was the admonition of the prophet one thousand years before 
 the birth of Christ, and what was in existence then exists to-day, and 
 in a greater degree. 
 
 The churches of God, which state that they shall last forever, 
 have, with commendable forethought and fostering care, done their 
 utmost to crush the evil. The sternness of those sublime Christian 
 maityrs who left Old England that they might worship God according 
 to the dictates of their own consciences, and insisted that all others 
 should do the same, and wh'^ were always ready to assist at the sack- 
 ing of some royal mansion occupied by the ungodly, has given way to 
 a free and easy morality that is really comfortable, and in strict terms 
 is absolute Christianity, or at least it passes for such. 
 ^ It is stated that attending operas dancing and playing cards is 
 strictly prohibited by the discipline of some of the churches, and that 
 upon joining a church the sacred assurance, if not an oath, is given by 
 the convert that he or she will observe this rule. Upon receiving their 
 " second sight," however, and comforting themselves with the reflec- 
 tion that "I don't think there is any harm in dancing anyway," the 
 rule is forgotten, and the churches themselves conveniently overlook 
 it, hence by their "liberality" there appears to be no amusement too 
 dangerous for them to tamper with in their desire to secure members 
 and adherents. How many members would two thirds of the city 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 99 
 
 churches, other than those of the Roman Catholic faith and the Church 
 of England, have, if they expelled from their communion those who 
 dance, play cards and attend operas ? The late Rev. John A Williams, 
 D.D., General Superintendent of the Methodist Church, said to me 
 concerning a church of which he was pastor : 
 
 " My feelings have never been so hurt in my career as a Chris- 
 tian minister as at the present time. The wealthy members of my 
 congregation dance, they play cards and attend operas, and they know 
 it is a violation of the discipline, yet if I were to preach against it 
 they would probably leave the church, knowing it cannot exist without 
 them. They are its main support." 
 
 The man who would visit a house of ill-fame to feast his eyes on 
 the charms of women has no longer any excuse for doing so. The 
 opera, and in a greater degree the ball room supply the substitute where 
 society charms us with as much nakedness as they dare expose to view» 
 and in the fulness of time, no doubt, greater progress will be made in 
 the divine art of full dress. 
 
 Every once in a while some preacher will pour forth the vials of 
 his wrath or pretended wrath, either for effect or possibly in sincerity, 
 against the evils, but the bosom of society does not appear to be in 
 the least disturbed by thair pyrotechnics. Indeed, the very reverse 
 appears to be the case. A few years ago af^stheticism used to be the 
 craze. Now, to secure popularity a thing must be sensuous. Our 
 musical settings are sensuous, and now we are led to infer that that 
 old tradition of the forbidden fr-iit was not an apple at all, but really 
 love, and therefore, cohabitation. The Oratorio of Eve indicated and 
 expressed unreservedly what, in the great majority of cases, people 
 were afraid of giving utterance to. 
 
 In the observations I make, I have paid particular attention to 
 girls, because it is in the time of life peculiar to them that the greatest 
 danger lies, and also acting on the assumption that girls are more prone 
 to fall than boys. From fourteen to twenty the strongest element in 
 human nature is the passions, and the disgrace that attaches to their 
 gratification, especially to girls, is lifelong. 
 
 An incident came to my notice a while ago, which is an apt 
 illustration. Some school boys and girls conceived the idea of a post- 
 office, and it was soon put into successful operation. Unfortunately 
 the teacher discovered the scheme, and confiscated the correspondence. 
 It was a remarkable and bountiful harvest, and the letters that Cleo- 
 patra wrote to her lover were as nothing compared to these. There 
 was a sensuous abandon in them that was really startling in emanating 
 from such a source. Some of the proudest people in that place had 
 sons and daughters concerned in it. What blackmail that teacher 
 could levy if he were an evil disposed person. Every boy who took 
 part in it remembers it to this day, as well as the nature of the letters 
 the girls wrote. 
 
 I contend, therefore, in all sincerity, that neither men nor boys, 
 inflamed by passion, would be prone to ask a woman or girl of pre- 
 
100 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 sumably chaste character, to share a sin that society is said never to 
 forgive, if he ran no danger of being arrested for visiting a house of 
 ill-fame. Dr. Napheys, a medical or rather a physiological writer 
 of considerable prominence in speaking on the subject of dancing 
 says that whatever stimulates the emotions leads to an unnatural sexual 
 appetite. Late hours, flashy papers, love stories, talk of beaux, love 
 and marriage, that atmosphere of riper years which is so often and so 
 injudicially thrown around the children in the United States, parties, 
 sensational novels, the drama, the ball-room, and a particular emphasis 
 is laid upon the power of music and dancing to awaken and stimulate 
 the passions. 
 
 In diametrical opposition to the precepts deduced from experience 
 by one of the most widely known physicians in the United States, 
 society appears to do precisely the reverse of what he teaches, and all 
 the amusements which he most emphatically condemns society pro- 
 vides for both sexes, from children to any age this side of the grave. 
 Are they, therefore, inviting the substitution of the social evil by 
 making provision for those who require it ? 
 
 It is not very long ago that one of the many different mutual 
 benefit societies gave an at-home, and following the at-home with a 
 dance. The daughter of a well-known clergyman begged permission 
 to attend the at home, which was graciously granted, the reverend 
 gentleman considerately deciding to remain up until the young lady 
 returned. Ten, eleven, twelve o'clock struck, and he decided that she 
 had gone home with a friend. An hour or two later, he was awakened 
 by his daughter's return, and was informed that the affair was just over^ 
 First an at-home and a dance afterwards. 
 
 " And did you dance ?" 
 
 "Yes." 
 
 The young lady had not missed a single dance in the course of 
 the evening. 
 
 I his could be verified by a cloud of witnesses, and I mention it to 
 demonstrate how little men, no matter what their profession may be, 
 know of the longings of young people, and how little influence they 
 really possess, even over their own children. 
 
 I may be permitted to observe, I think, that I am not opposed to 
 dancing, but I mention these circumstances merely from a physiological 
 standpoint, and if Christianity can encourage what the churches are 
 pleased to call vices, (Bishop Dumoulin, I think it was, who called 
 progressive euchre progressive deviltry), in their own way, I do not see 
 that I am trespassing the rules of good taste in suggesting the licens- 
 ing of houses of ill-fame. 
 
 It may be, perhaps, that those estimable women who permit their 
 
 daughters to run the streets may be philosophical in exposing them to 
 
 corrupting influences, and running their chances of becoming xax in 
 
 ► iiO^heir morals on Ihe same principle as that famous Frenchwoman, who, 
 
 ^hen being admonished for attempting to procure a girl as mistress 
 
 •►^ , for a rich nobleman, answered : 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 101 
 
 " It's always a pleasure to have one more woman to torment the 
 men. It's girls like those who avenge us honest women." 
 
 It was a belief of ancient races, and indeed a current belief among 
 modern nations that it is not given to man to beliold the image of 
 another world and live. The Arab who meets a phantom in the desert 
 goes home to die. He knows the hand of. doom is upon him. He 
 has seen that whir; for mortal eyes it is fatal to look upon, and it is 
 thus in some measure with those who are admitted within the dark 
 precincts of murder's dread sanctuary. Not swiftly does the curtain 
 fall which has once been lifted from the hideous horrors of its ghastly 
 temple. The revelations of an utterly wicked soul leave a lasting 
 impress upon the mind which unwillingly becomes the recipient of 
 these awful secrets. So, too, will this apply to the girl or woman of 
 the age, who is inclined to take the first step in the downward path, 
 and while it may be said that the present system of religion is begin- 
 ring to teach us that for our sins committed upon earth there will be 
 nj future punishment such as was believed in past ages less enlightened 
 than we, it might still be borne in mind that men nor boys ever keep 
 secret a sin of this nature, and the girl who once falls may depend 
 upon it that she will be certain to be known by every intimate friend 
 of the one with whom she shares the sin, and this knowledge is likely 
 to be used by those who know it for their own purposes. Boys have 
 told me of girls with whom t!^.ey had had improper relations, the girls 
 requesting the most sacred promises that they would never mention it, 
 and then keeping the promise by telling me and others as well. 
 
 I respectfully invite the disinterested reader to carefully compare 
 my assertions and the incidents I have enumerated as showing the 
 deplorable extent of the nation's immorality, with those of the so-called 
 public moralists of the present day, such as staff Inspector Archibald. 
 
 I hold that men like him are not competent to give a reliable 
 opinion on public morality, simply because they know nothing at all 
 about it. I speak from experience and observation, and consequently 
 with a reasonable degree of authority. The fact that houses of ill-fame 
 are raided and the frequenters punished, thereby breaking up the house, 
 is no evidence that prostitution is on the decrease. 
 
 Young women of this character are doing just the same as boys 
 and young men have been doing for years— they rent a room or two 
 over some store and by putting in a sewing machine, carry the idea 
 that they are seamstresses. They take men there at night and no one 
 is any the wiser. In the summer time the parks and the suburbs are 
 used for this purpose, while the island is simply an open air place of 
 prostitution, or charnal house. If this were not so why was it necessary 
 to suggest that the tents be completely prohibited there ? The island 
 is simply a rend ez-vous for prostitutes, and not only that, it is a rendez- 
 vous for '• presumably " respectable girls, as I know by experience and 
 what I have seen. 
 
 Men like Inspector Archibald parade around with their noses in 
 the air, and declare such things are impossibilities. Would it ever occur 
 
102 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 to one of these people to follow a boy and girl or '• pike " them as the 
 boys call it — who were walking together and finding out the immorality 
 that exists amongst boys and girls ? A decided negative is the answer 
 to both questions. I conscientiously assert that there is not one man 
 or 'Oman in a thousand in the United States or Canada who knows 
 his or her son's private character. 
 
 One particular example occurs to me in this connection. One 
 evening in a city of Canada, I, in company v;ith two others observed a 
 youth of about 1 6 dismount from his bycicle, and tossing away the 
 cigarette he had been smoking, commence a conversation with a little 
 iiirl of about 14 or 15, and tried to entice her into a laneway for an 
 immoral purpose. The young lady did not go, however, answering 
 him: "No, I won't go." He is the son of an ex-president of the 
 Y.M.C.A. of that town, a gentleman who makes it his special business 
 to admonish all boys who smoke cigarettes, and point out to them the 
 frightful penalties attending those who smoke. Would he for one 
 moment believe that his son would be guilty of smoking or what is 
 apparently of less consequence, breaking the seventh commandment ? 
 This shows how little parents know of what their own children are 
 doing. At the W.C.T.U. convention held in 1896, the report of the 
 Plan of Work Committee said that the use of tobacco among boys was 
 growing altogether too fast, and they urged the superintendents of the 
 districts to make an effort to form anti-cigarette and tobacco leagues 
 among the school children. This would pledge them to abstain from 
 the uses of narcotics. They asked that members of churches who kept 
 stores and sold tobacco should do away with the sale of it. 
 
 Incidentally, and I am quite sure unintentionally, the W.C.T.U. 
 have given me one of my best arguments against themselves and other 
 public moralists, when they state that the use of tobacco amongst boys 
 was growing altogether too fast It shows first of all that in spite of 
 the Minor's Tobacco Act, boys still smoke. It also proves the apparent 
 contempt that boys hold for the opinions of these women when they 
 inform them in their Temperance Physiology of the frightful effects of 
 smoking. Also that coercive laws do not avail in the suppression of 
 vice. 
 
 I was introduced to a set of students a short time ago, some twelve 
 or fourteen who usually chumned together. They were all under twenty 
 years of age, and quite one half were then under treatment for private 
 diseases. One of them laughingly said to me, when I mentioned that 
 a number of them declined to drink any spirituous liquors with me, that 
 usually sixty per cent were suffering from private diseases, and that 
 sometimes it ran up to seventy-five per cent. Would their mothers 
 believe that ? 
 
 I venture to assert that if this information were given to any of 
 these public moralists, they would not believe it. It would explode all 
 their pet theories and that would never do. They will believe nothing 
 that they don't wish to believe. 
 
 During the past ten years I have met many young men up to 
 
OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 108 
 
 twenty-five or twenty-six years of age, and some as young as fifteen. 
 There is not one who has not broken the seventh commandment, and 
 sixty per cent have f ufiered from venereal diseases— one of them was 
 only seventeen when he contracted it. 
 
 In views of these facts would it not be wiser to permit houses of 
 ill-fame subject to Inspection ? 
 
 I contend that it would keep respectable girls freer from corrup- 
 tion, and check the spread of venereal diseases. 
 
 One of the Police Commissioners is Judge McDougall — a gentle- 
 man of the highest possible integrity, and one in whom the citizens of 
 Toronto have implicit faith and confidence. I would suggest that he 
 obtain the services of a young man of eighteen years of age, of good 
 appearance, and who has seen something of life. Let him be of good 
 moral character. 
 
 A boy like this is a very common commodity, as nine tenths of 
 the boys of the present generation would come under this heading, 
 adverse opinions to the contrary notwithstanding. Let him be informed 
 that h'j is to act as a private detective and for three months he is to 
 keep a reliable diary of every time he breaks the seve th command- 
 ment, giving the name of the girl or woman and the particulars. Let 
 him be employed in one of the large Departmental stores if possible, 
 and board at a house where it will cost from four dollars to four dollars 
 and a half a week. For an expenditure of two hundred dollars Judge 
 McDougall could obtain the services of one of the cleverest boy detec- 
 tives in New York or Chicago. At the end of three months if no one 
 in the city but the Judge and the young detective knew the latter's 
 business he would send in a report that would make the ordinary man's 
 hair stand* but it would also prove beyond question all the evidences 
 I have submitted. I can even foreshadow the list of people he would 
 have on his list 
 
 My foreshadow would be simply a repetition of what has transpired 
 in the city amongst friends of mine, and I suggest this course as a means 
 of demonstrating to an independent man that it would be better to 
 tolerate houses than that such things should be perpetrated, as I know 
 for a certainty that they are. 
 
 I wish to state in connection with my remarks about a boarding 
 house, that I selected, hap-hazard — from newspaper advertisements a 
 boarding house which suited me on account of its locality, the street 
 and number I need not mention. There were three or four lady boarders, 
 the landlady and three servants. There waj only one of the whole 
 crowd who was respectable and that was one of the ladies who was • 
 married, yet even she allowed herself to be kissed by some of the gent- 
 lemen boarders. The landlady's son whom I had taken to the theatre 
 several times, told me in a burst of confidence, what I already knew — 
 that all the domestics were not of good character, and that the land- 
 lady and two of thfe boarders were not I discovered without much diffi- 
 culty. Such cases as these are far more prolific of corruption than 
 houses of ill-fame would be, but to tolerate houses of ill-fame would be 
 
104 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 considered something frightful, because its appearance is b.id. A woman 
 considers that her son has disgraced her if he be seen drunk, though 
 that is no sin, yet committing adultery, which is a violation of one of 
 the ten commandmei ts and a cardinal sin, would probably not cause 
 her a second thougl if it were not publicly known. Similarly, in the 
 United States the hot bed of moral crusades, the W.C.T.U., the Epworth 
 League and other societies like the sands of the sea, without number, 
 and in a lesser degree in Canada, are not druggists waxing fat on the 
 sales to women of opium, chloral, as well as drugs and instruments 
 that enable women to commit murder and still the unburn life within 
 them every time the Almighty has put his seal of blessing upon them, and 
 their families had reached a convenient number, or they did not wish 
 to have children ? Why do not these women who are so fearful about 
 boys and about children being on the streets after dark, turn their 
 attention to something of this kind ? I decline to believe that there is 
 any reason other than because such things are not publicly known, and 
 that there is no notoriety connected with it. 
 
 One lad of eighteen years informed me that in five years there 
 had not been a domestic in their house with whom he had not had 
 improper relations. 
 
 Another of sixteen stated that it was a rare thing for them to have 
 a domestic with whom he did not have improper relations. 
 
 One of fifteen stated to me that he had improper relations with a 
 domestic servant who was twice his age, and he showed me the vermin 
 on his body she had communicated to him. A lad of eighteen for 
 whose family the same woman worked after leaving the first place had 
 similar relations with similar results. The same lad of fifteen pointed 
 out to me the domestic who had succeeded the woman of thirty, and 
 he said he had improper relations with her. A girl from a nighboring 
 town took the place of the last girl, and this lad came to me one night 
 stating that his father had caught him en flagrante delicto^ and had 
 boxed his ears and dismissed the girl. This is the experience of a boy 
 not yet sixteen with three successive domestic servants. 
 
 Another lad of fourteen, whom I only know by sight, was import- 
 uning a young friend of mine to obtain him some powdered cantharides 
 which he wished to give to a youg miss, the daughter of a gentleman 
 in the employ of the Dominion Government. Precocity it is not ? 
 
 A friend of mine, a clerk in one of one of the city banks, asked 
 me to take a room with him on Wilton Avenue, informing me at the 
 same time the reason he wished it. A young lady whom he had known 
 before he and she had come to Toronto to live, was rooming there, and 
 she had informed him that a double room was vacant. He stated the 
 advantages of rooming there, one of which was that the young lady's 
 room was precisely opposite the vacant one, the rest you can imagine. 
 The young lady was a stenographer in the city, and the double room 
 was more than my friend cared to indulge in. The favors to be received 
 from the young lady was the inducement he offered me to leave the 
 room I was then occupying ^ go with him. 
 
• i i f 
 
 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. l('5 
 
 A young man of eighteen or nineteen, a handsome and gentle- 
 manly looking fellow boarded in a house on Shuter street where a 
 widow lady was also boarding. He was attending business college at 
 the time, and one night one of his fellow boarders heard a discussion 
 in the widow's room, between them. She was upraiding him for visit- 
 ing houses of ill-repute, for which, she said there was no occasion when 
 sht vas there. He afterwards confessed that she had made the first 
 overtures to him by coming to his room one morning. After having 
 left the city some time he received a letter from the widow in which 
 she had expressed the fear that she was enciente, and hoping that if 
 such were the case he would do something for her. Upon my advice 
 he paid no attention to this letter, as I regarded it as blackmail, and as 
 far as I am aware he never heard anything more about it. 
 
 A young man of twenty who was boarding in a house where several 
 Normal school students were boarding informed me that he had had 
 improper relations with several of them, as well as with several domes- 
 tics in the same house. I hese normalites would be very efficient ins- 
 tructors of the young, would they not ? 
 
 I consider such circumstances as the foregoing simply appalling, 
 and demonstrating a frightfully low standard of morality, and I think 
 it is far more to the purpose that men and women should endeavour 
 to inculcate morality amongst their children, than sending missionaries 
 to outlandish places where they are not wanted, also that suppressing 
 houses of ill-fame is not reducing the sin one iota. 
 
 I could cover page after page of such examples, did I wish, of 
 experiences that have been told me by boys and young men, though I 
 wish to add that they had no idea I intended using their information 
 for this purpose. 
 
 I met a young woman some time ago, and in the course of the 
 evening she gave me quite a biography of herself. She had been in 
 the employ of a well known merchant as domestic, and stated without 
 any reservation that the two sons of this merchant, one a lad of seven- 
 teen and the other about twenty had had constant improper relations 
 with her. She enumerated boys and young men one after another, not 
 one of whom was over twenty-three years of age, sons of well known 
 men, who had had improper relations with her. 
 
 I could enumerate instances of this nature also almost without 
 number, which I have earned from young women, who were prostitutes, 
 but not inmates of houses of ill-fame. 
 
 A young lady the daughter of one of the best known tien in the 
 city of Toronto, made the proposition that Potiphar's w fe made to 
 Joseph to a boy who delivered groceries at her father's house, informing 
 him at the same time that she was alone in the house. He was a 
 remarkably handsome boy, with a bright healthy color in his cheeks 
 and eyes that shone like stars. 
 
 On the broad basis of subtle reasoning I ask : Would it not be as 
 well to give a trial to the system of inspecting houses of ill-fame when 
 such deplorable circumstances as I have given you are constantly taking 
 place ? 
 
106 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Ii. the course of a ramble over the island on a Saturday night, I 
 came across several couples en flagrante delect o ! Houses ot ill-fame in 
 Toronto ? Certainly not. The whole city is an immense house of ill- 
 fame, the roofof which is the blue canopy of heaven during the summer 
 months. Some of the-e people whom I run across, after having appa- 
 rently satisfied themselves from my height that I was not a policeman 
 in plain clothes, ignored my existtnce entirely. One or two however, 
 jumped up and hurried away. 
 
 What is the object of suppressing houses of ill-fame anyway ? If 
 it is to eievate public morality, I respectfully submit to an independent 
 public the circumstances I have cited, and ask, doss it do so ? There is 
 not a single boy whose experiences I have given, that has not stated 
 that he would rather visit a house of ill-fame than do what he did. 
 Fear of disease, the police and as a consequence his father's hearing of 
 it, alone would restrain him. In reason, therefore. I contend that if 
 these boys who related their experiences to me told the truth, and 
 I believe every word of it, is it not logical to assume that the great 
 majority of boys could give similar experiences ? 
 
 Would it be possible for Inspector Archibald or any other public 
 moralist, male or female, to obtain such information from a group of 
 boys ? I am quite positive it would not. And yet what I have told 
 you is nothing to what I might tell if space permitted or I felt it were 
 necessary in illustrating my contentions. I could give the experiences 
 of boys and young men, who made no scruples about telling me girls' 
 names with whom they had had improper relations. The list of girls 
 would include some of the daughters of men of highest social and 
 financial positions. 
 
 A young friend of mine who, when I first met him, was a lad in 
 knickerbockers, whom I considered one of the handsomest boys in 
 Toronto, informed me that when he first entered a business house in 
 Toronto, he was invited by different girls in the work room to have 
 improper relations with them, and there was hardly one with whom he 
 had not had such. He was then a boy of seventeen. In three years he 
 was a physical wreck, and the last time I saw him (he was then leaving 
 the city) he was suffering from a long standing attack of private disease. 
 Compare these deplorable circumstances with the vain glory of having 
 suppressed a few houses of ill-fame. 
 
 A young friend of mine was away to a certain place on his summer 
 holidays, and as is usual in such places, everyone knows everyone else. 
 One evening he took a girl into the woods hard by, and on his way 
 with her he noticed that a lady — married and with a family — was 
 following. He said nothing to his companion but entered the woods 
 with her, the lady following and maintaining a position so that she 
 saw all that happened, which, I may frankly state, was a breach of the 
 seventh commandment. As soon as he left the girl he walked straight 
 to the lady's house, and opened the conversation : 
 
 " I suppose you thought you caught me nice, Mrs. Jones, didn't 
 you? "Well I saw you..." 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. lOT 
 
 " Just you wait, Johnn)' Smith, If I don't write home to your 
 mother and tell her what you did." 
 
 ♦• If you say one word to my mother, Mrs. Jones, I'll go straight to 
 Mr. Jones and tell him you followed me, and what you saw, and I'll 
 tell it all over here too. No decent nroman would do what you did to- 
 night." Mrs. " Jones " did not write to Mrs. Smith it may be unne- 
 cessary to add. 
 
 That incident happened when "Johnny Smith" was fifteen years 
 of age. H^ told it to me when he was eighteen, and I ventured the 
 remark that Mrs. Jones would easily fall if she had not already done so. 
 Some months afterwards he asked me if I recalled the circumstances 
 he had mentioned, and on my replying that I did, he said the deduction 
 that I had made at that time was correct, that scandal was already busy 
 with Mrs. Jones* name, and that she was being quietly dropped by her 
 former friends one by one. That lady has a family of children and her 
 husband is considered worth a hundred thousand dollars easily. 
 
 Do not these circumstances clearly and unquestionably demons- 
 trate that the assertions of Rev. Father Decarie are absolute truth, and 
 that he knows what he is talking about ? It is perhaps superfl lous for 
 me to add that the names of these people were not Smith and Jones, 
 but they answer the purpose. 
 
 From my superior standpoint of observation as well as my exper- 
 ience, I have come to the conclusion that the majority of women are 
 fools. A young friend of mine of fifteen mentioned that two girls were 
 in the habit of coming to the varandah of his house to talk to him. He 
 had had improper relations with both of them. His mother rather 
 laughed at him and declared that he would be married before he was 
 eighteen. The idea that her fair haired boy went with those girls for 
 any improper purpose never entered her imagination. The idea of 
 getting married was so far removed from the boy's mind that he never 
 even thought of it. He went with them for a certain purpose only. 
 Tell that to his mother and she would laugh you to scorn, whatever 
 that may mean — I have seen it in novels quite frequently though. A 
 youth of eighteen was visiting me once, and where I boarced was a 
 young miss of sixteen who sometimes waited on the table — the land- 
 lady's daughter. My friend had a moderate fortune, and the landlady 
 having discovered this was quite willing to throw her daughter into his 
 society hoping, doubtless, that he might marry her. She had made 
 some inquiries from me about my friend's financial position which led 
 me to this belief, and still further confirmed it by questions about him. 
 His ideas were rathei different. He thought from the young lady's 
 actions that she might fall and made his plans to meet her on the street 
 some night, to try it. He would not have thought of marrying the 
 girl, but was quite willing to ruin her, and schemed with that end in 
 view. He was not successful, however, for I spoke my mind so plainly 
 that he abandoned the idea. However, it indicates what his ideas were 
 and what the girl's mother's were, substantiating my idea, previously 
 expressed, that women are largely fools. 
 
108 OP TORONTO THB GOOD. 
 
 In the early part of October, 1896, J was discussing the subject 
 matter of this chapter with a gentleman who had been born and brought 
 up in the Province of Quebec, and he expressed the opinion that the 
 mother of every girl who goes wrong should be made to pay the penalty 
 instead of the boy or man with whom she shares the sin. He also gave 
 me a piece of information that I may as well publish. Some years ago 
 in the parish where he resided quite a number of girls were in the habit 
 of leaving their homes to go into domestic service in Montreal and 
 Quebec. When they would return on a short vacation they were arrayed 
 in garments of such glory and beauty and expensive jewelry that the 
 parish priest became suspicious. He spent nearly a month in Montreal 
 and discovered that these girls and others besides them were employed 
 as domestics by wealthy people at twice the wages such servants usually 
 received, but that in addition to the light domestic service they per- 
 formed, they were the mistresses of the sons of these houses^ and were 
 paid such high wages on account of their youth, beauty and willingness 
 to sell their purity. This circumstance, frightful as it is by itself, de- 
 monstrates also how much better able a priest is to judge than any 
 theoretical public moralists are, and how extremely little the public 
 know of what is going on in the very centres of civilization and 
 Christianity. 
 
 A despatch from Halifax, N. S., on July 12th stated that Ins- 
 pector Banks and a squad of police raided a millinery establishment in 
 Barrington street on .Saturday night, and found a lot of young women 
 and men belonging to good families. The establishment was found to 
 be a resort of the lowest kind. The discovery has created a sensation. 
 
 In the traditions of the Rabbins it is written that those are the 
 elect of God who suffer his chastisement in the flesh. For the others, 
 those who on earth drain the goblet 01 pleasure, and riot in the raptures 
 of sin, for them comes the dread retribution after death. They are 
 plunged in the fire, and driven before the wind, they take the shape of 
 loathsome reptiles, and ascend by infinitesimal degrees through all ♦^he 
 grades of creation, until their storm-tossed, wearied, degraded souls re- 
 enter human semblance once more. But even then their old standpoint 
 is not re-gained, their dread penance not yet performed. As men and 
 women they are the lowest and worst of their race, slaves toiling in 
 the desert, dirt to be trampled under the feet of their prosperous 
 brethren and sisters. Inch by inch the wretched soul regains its lost in- 
 heritance, cycles must elapse before the awful sentence is fulfilled. But 
 the Christian faith teaches no such horrors. Even for the penitent of 
 the eleventh hour there is promise of pardon. Men and women, boys 
 and girls are reasoning creatures, and they know that while committing 
 a sin they are doing wrong, yet the fate of the repentant dying thief 
 constantly before them impels them to run the risk, with no principle 
 to guide ihem, and they fall. The pleasure of draining the goblet of 
 pleasure is too strong for resistance, and they succumb, feeling that it 
 is worth the experiment to enjoy the present and leave the future to 
 take care of itself, just as Eve did in the garden of Eden. 
 
OP TORONTO THB GOOD. 109 
 
 Legislatures are incessantly bringing up the question of raiding the 
 age of consent, but to the practical man or boy of the world, it would 
 be no hindrance to him if the age were sixty instead of sixteen. In 
 ninety cases out of a hundred there is no seduction committed at all, 
 it is simply fornication, and in the majority of cases the girl make? the 
 first overtures. 
 
 This has been the history of the world since the beginning, and 
 what is true of Potiphar's wife and Joseph is true to-day only on z 
 larger scale, because there are more people to-day then there were then, 
 and our social customs make the opportunities greater. 
 
 Examine the Criminal statistics of the Dominion of Canada, and how 
 many cases come before judges or magistrates, where boys or men are 
 charged with st-Jucing girls who have not reached the age of consent ? 
 I only know of one during the last six months, and I give you the 
 ieport of the proceedings in court. 
 
 " Not guilty, sir," said Jacob Hopkins, when the clerk of the court asked him how he 
 pleaded. He was airaigned on a charge of seducing Mary Kliza Smart, a girl then under i6 
 years of age, in the township of Gwillimbury in July f>f last year. Hopkins was very emphatic 
 m his denial. The girl who is pretty, but small for her years, was a oomestic in the service of 
 the prisoner's father at the time of the alleged offence. She gave her evidence planly amid 
 tears. Before cross-examination, Judge McDougall said that if the evidence continued in the 
 same way, he would have the present indictment quashed and one for rape substituted. 
 
 Continuing her evidence, Mary Smart swore that her baby, born last June, has died. 
 Upon cross-examination by Mr. Rowell, she said her sister married Charles Pegg. He is the 
 young man who was connected with the Lottie Evans Sharon poisoning case, having been tried 
 and acquitted 
 
 lacob Hopkins, the Whitchurch farmer, was acquitted of the charge of seduction made 
 against him by Mary Kliza Smart. Her story was not corroborated, and the judge withdrew the 
 case from the jury, ordering an acquittal. 
 
 Is it not the history of almost every case that is brought into Court 
 that the prosecution can never secure a conviction because the defen- 
 dant does not happen to be the first one who has had improper rela- 
 tions with the girl in the case } That serves to demonstrate how few 
 there are who are pure, and what little difference it makes as to what 
 the age of consent is. 
 
 I may just mention an incident that will show that the age of con- 
 sent makes no difference, for if any man discovers that his daughter 
 has been seduced, he would prefer remaining quiet about it than insti- 
 tuting proceedings against a boy for doing so, knowing quite well that 
 the exposure is simply ruination for life for the girl. A lady residing 
 in a town not many miles from Toronto discovered that her stable boy 
 had seduced her daughter. She promptly discharged him. The boy 
 was naturally compelled to tell his father the cause of his dismissal, 
 and the father told it to a friend of his one evening while going home 
 from work. This friend told it to his son, and two days afterwards 
 the whole town knew of the girl's disgrace. The mother of that girl, 
 by her action, simply ruined her daughter for life. And it would always 
 be so. Hence raising the age of consent is not in any respect a pro- 
 tection to girls. But if those old women of both sexes, who talk of 
 public morals with about as much sense as a child prattles of its toys, 
 would take the trouble to instill into the minds of their daughters the 
 
no OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 disgrace that attaches to such a sin, there might be less of it. A proprie- 
 tress of one of Chicago's most prominent houses of ill-fame stated to 
 Mr. Stead that girls err through not being informed by their mothers, 
 and that uncongenial homes force more girls into trouble than anything 
 else. I would take that woman's word on this subject in the face of 
 any contrary opinion by all the united forces of professional public 
 moralists in the United States and Canada together. She knows. 
 That is the word. She knows. 
 
 1 do not believe there is one boy in a hundred under the age of i8 
 who knows that there is a law regulating the age of consent, and what 
 is more the age of consent does not deter these boys from seducing 
 any girl who will listen to him. The only deterrent effect raising the 
 age of consent likely to have is to prevent men from seducing girls and 
 that is almost unnecessary, as men very rarely do so. It is boys of their 
 own age who generally accomplish the ruination of a girl, and there is 
 not one case in ten thousand where I have ever heard that the boy was 
 prosecuted. As a matter of fact I have never heard of a case in my life. 
 
 Minds form and tongues give utterance to theories which every 
 day lives kick holes into so that there is not a vestige left of the grand 
 illusions built up by people who pose as public moralists. Let me ask 
 any one of those ladies who are so much concerned with respect to the 
 morals of other people's sons : If her son were found to be guilty of 
 improper relations with a domestic in her house, what would she do ? 
 Would she heroically make an example of her son ? Would she condone 
 the offence of the servant ? Not by any means. I have never yet known 
 of a mother having done so. She would do as women have done since 
 the world began. She would blame the girl, whether she were to blame 
 or not. It is very nice to theorize what should be done in the case of 
 other people's sons, but when it come to their own it makes all the 
 difference in the world. Yet these people are driven into a frenzy 
 because the law is not stricter in regard to agec of consent and seduc- 
 tion of servants, etc. These very people would be the last to live 
 up to the requirements of the laws in such connections. In giving 
 utterance to her heroic theories, a woman invariably takes the position 
 that a man or boy is the seducer and is wholly to blame, and is, there- 
 fore, the only one that should be punished. In practice, however, it 
 invariably turns out that the girl or woman is blamed, and she is the 
 one that is punished if anyone is punished. I never knew a case 
 different in my life. 
 
 Some years ago two boys, cousins, committed rape upon a girl who 
 was the sister of one and the cousin of the other. They were arrested 
 tried, convicted and sentenced to two years in the Penitentiary. The 
 result is that those boys when they got out, did not return to the place 
 where the disgrace occurred, but are to-day respectable citizens while 
 the girl is still unmarried, and even to this day she and her family are 
 looked at askance for an act that happened twenty years ago. Was it 
 any benefit to that girl to have those boys punished ? Would it not 
 have been far better to have let the matter drop, than press it to such 
 
OF TOBONTO THR GOOD. Ill 
 
 a conclusion ? That girl is disgraced forever, she will never be married, 
 and simply because her father, a hot headed English ignoramus deter- 
 mined to punish these boys. This case is not in any respect different 
 from the other one in the sense that the girl is the one who bears the 
 disgrace when such things become known. Raising the age of consent 
 will never purify morals as long as civilization is as it is in the present 
 day. And there is no prospect of its changing. No woman in practice 
 would dream of doing that she demands in theory, or what she demands 
 for the sake of hearing herself talk. 
 
 It is not quite within therecoUectionof every resident of Toronto, 
 how a young girl of fifteen, residing in the west end of the city, being 
 unable to conceal her condition any longer, was compelled to acknow- 
 ledge herst\{ encien/e, and confessed that her brother, a boy of 17 was 
 responsible for her condition ? And that the brother was obliged to 
 leave the city in consequence ? 
 
 The scarcity of cases in the criminal courts is not in any respect 
 an evidence that no improper relations are not going on. It indicates 
 what I have always contended — that the evil goes on, and as girls will 
 certainly not tell there is absolutely no danger in its commission, unless 
 conception results from these relations. 
 
 I clipped the following from a Chicago paper : 
 
 Myrtle Bonnet, Columbus. Ohio, the 13 year old daughter of Dr. A. L. Bonnet, who was 
 dismissed from the Mound street public school a few days ago because she was found to be in 
 a delicate condition, was married to Pearl Colt, the 15 year old boy who acknowledged to the 
 responsibility of her condition. 
 
 A young lady of my acquaintance once informed me that her father 
 had stated that if he ever found out anything compromising about any 
 young man with his daughter, he would assuredly shoot him. To the 
 young lady herself he had said : 
 
 " Jennie, if any young man ever makes any wrong suggestions to 
 you you tell me, and I'll settle him so that he won't do it again." 
 
 It was the young lady herself who told this, and told it to two or 
 three others besides myself, with whom she was acquainted. That was 
 the sublimity of innocence was it not } 
 
 If my assertions were not true, how is it that so many girls, ap- 
 parently respectable, are the contempt of boys with whom they are 
 acquainted ? It is an axiom that a girl may share a sin with a boy, 
 and that same boy will have a flippant contempt for her and express 
 it to his friends. 
 
 This is simply nature according to Dr. Napheys, who says that 
 woman is endowed with a sense of shame, an invincible modesty, her 
 greatest protection and her greatest charm. Let her never forget it 
 for without it she becomes the scorn of her own sex and the jest of 
 the other. 
 
 But it is to be remembered that Dr. Napheys wrote his book thirty 
 years ago, and since then social usages have been revolutionized. In 
 this age of grace it is scarcely necessary for a boy to exercise himself 
 to meet girls, for girls go to all places where boys are. You have only 
 to pass any place where boys are practising athletics, and the streets 
 
112 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. , 
 
 are thronged with girls in their teens— a nightly occurrence. My 
 opinion of the bicycle craze has been that gir s ride bicycles simply 
 because it gives them opportunities to associate with boys.Jon the prin- 
 ciple of Mohamet, who, as the mountain would not come to him, was 
 forced to go to the mountain. A girl would be considered decidedly 
 immodest did she go on long tramps with boys, but on her bicycle she 
 can at the same time gratify her taste for boys' society and satisfy the 
 demands of propriety, which takes cognizance not so much of what 
 you do, but how you do it, and questions your motives not at all. If I 
 were to claim this opinion in regard to bicycling as exclusively my 
 own, being of the opposite sex, I should, probably be termed evil minded 
 or worse, and told to mind my own business. The Women's Rescue 
 League of Washington, however, goes even farther than I do, and says 
 it is a vulgar, indecent craze, and has helped to swell the ranks of 
 reckless girls who finally drift into the standing away of outcast women 
 of the United States more than any other medium. 
 
 Evangelist Chiverea when conducting revival services at Winnipeg 
 held a meeting for women only at which circulars against bicycle riding 
 were distributed which gave offence to many of the women present. As 
 a result the engagement of the evangelist to address a W.C.T.U, meeting 
 was cancelled by the ladies of the society. It shows that men must 
 not interfere in such matter, whether right or wrong. 
 
 Public moralists objected to pictures of ballet dancers being posted 
 on the streets of Toronto, because it corrupted public morals, by which 
 they mean, I presume, creating unholy desires on the part of boys and 
 men. I assert that one girl in a bloomer costume will create far greater 
 and more widespread corruption amongst boys than a city full of show 
 bills, so will a well developed girl in short dresses. One member of the 
 W.C.T.U. was against having the show bills, while another asked what 
 business it was of any member of the school board of Toronto whether 
 the teachers wear bloomers or not. One objection was raised by a 
 man, that constituted a sufficient reason why the lady trustee asked 
 what business it was of his anyway. Where is their consistency ? Any 
 school boy can tell you every girl in the school who has well developed 
 limbs, and he will discuss the girl with his friends. The pictures of 
 ballet dancers on the walls would scarcely give him a second thought 
 a girl such as 1 describe will be constantly before his mind. Would 
 these hysterical fools who wish to have such posters suppressed even 
 think of having their daughters' dresses lengthened to proclude the 
 possibility of impure thoughts on the part of boys ? Hardly likely. I 
 contend that girls are less modest than boys, as is proven by experience. 
 Go to a photographer and see some of the samples of his work, and 
 you will see girls draped in every possible manner that will show their 
 arms, shoulders and busts. Do they do that for any purpose other than 
 to influence the passions and create unholy desires on the part of men 
 and boys ? During my residence in an eastern city a young miss of 
 seventeen or eighteen had her photograph taken draped, showing her 
 bare arms, shoulders and bust, the pictures being on exhibition in the 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 113 
 
 window. If the young person's intention was to exhibit her charms and 
 inflame the passions, and create unholy desires on the part of boys, I 
 may say for the information of herself and the public generally that 
 she was successful. Numberless boys and young men mentioned to me 
 the fact of their having seen the picture, coupled with opinions of her 
 charms, and expressing desires that while they may be inseparable from 
 healthy youth, are scarcely used in polite society. They would discuss 
 this photograph and all it suggested, yet I never knew there were ballet 
 picture* in that city by hearing them spoken of. 
 
 If you will take the trouble to discuss the subject with any dress- 
 maker she will give you innumerable experiences with young girls who 
 will struggle with the pertinacity of a gladiator against having their 
 dresses lengthened. Why is it ? Do they know the impression it creates 
 in the minds of boys and are determined to cater to their immoral 
 de«ires ? On the other hand let any man go where there are boys in 
 bathing, naked, and almost every one of them will try to hide his 
 nakedness. I speak from my own observation, and consequently know 
 that it is so. 
 
 To expect consistency on the part of this class of people, however 
 would be to expect the impossible. A man and his wife, the latter of 
 whom is something of a speaker, are enthusiastic advocates of some 
 system of education having for its subject teaching kindness to dumb 
 brutes ; the same people had a cciple of boys working for them whom 
 they treated worse than dogs. I boarded in a house o .?e where the 
 young lady was horrified to find me reading a novel on Sunday. " My 
 father or mother would not allow me to do that," she exclaimed proud- 
 ly. Her saintly father or mother, however, put no bar to her runing 
 all over at nights, and the son of a prominent merchant boasted that 
 he had frequently improper relations with her. An old gentleman of 
 sixty, whose son aged about eighteen, was lying ill, discovered some 
 cigarettes in his son's room. He was perfectly scandalized. His son ! 
 smoking ! He almost took a fit of apoplexy, and it required quite an 
 ingenious falsehood to convince the old gentleman that the cigarettes 
 did not belong to his son. It is difficult to conjecture what the worthy 
 gentleman would have thought had he known the cause of his son's 
 ill-health. He was simply suffering from an attack of venereal disease. 
 Is it not an historical fact that when Thomas Hughes* stories of Tom 
 Brown were to be published in America, the saintly ladies on this side 
 of the Atlantic were fearful lest the author's references to drinking 
 should have a demoralizing effect upon their sons ? Is it not equally 
 true that some few years ago a young lady in writing a novel stated 
 in the preface that she was poor and wished to be rich, and knowing 
 that novels that suggested filth were the most widely read, she wrote 
 her novel accordingly and it was most successful ? Talk of consistency 1 
 There is scarcely a man or woman on the face of the earth who pretends 
 to lead some movement for the elevation of mankind, who knows what 
 consistency is. I could take you through a whole list of these men and 
 women in the city of Toronto to-day who might easily commence at 
 
114 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 home and practice some virtue that they are deficient in, and let public 
 questions such as intemperance, etc., alone. 
 
 I have listened to boys give their experiences with women older 
 than themselves, who were employed by their parents as governesses 
 or seamstresses and other positions rather higher than the domestic 
 servant, which I saw no reason to doubt. How many men are there 
 in Toronto who have dismissed this class of upper servant on account 
 of their relations with their sons? I could give the names of some quite 
 easily. I was once given the particulars of a case where a young fellow 
 just come from college fell in with a young woman working in his house 
 as a superior class of servant, nursery governess or something of that 
 kind, who was ten or twelve years older than he. He described min- 
 utely that woman's actions in his company, which were of such a nature 
 as could have all but sent her to prison. I believe the narrative, because 
 I do not think a boy of seventeen would possess sufficient ingenuity to 
 concoct such a story. And again what is more morbid than a woman 
 who has passed her thirtieth year in celibacy? 
 
 I do not think present day moralists know anything of what is 
 going on around them or they might endeavor to turn their attention 
 from such fads on Prohibition and Woman's Enfranchisement and try 
 to devise some means for promulgating social purity of a nature that has 
 not in it the sweets of newspaper notoriety, but would render the com- 
 mission of the breach of one of God's commandments less frequent than 
 I have endeavored to prove they are at the present time. 
 
 With the progress in religion that has been made within the past 
 few years and the agitation for the right of women to vote together with 
 the interest displayed on the part of women to prohibit other women's 
 husbands and brothers from drinking, it is not to be wondered at that 
 young girls consider themselves relieved from the necessity of the form- 
 ality of an introduction to a boy or young man whose acquaintanceship 
 they desire to make, presuming, doubtless, that this is one of the fund- 
 amental principles which women are striving for, and which the evolu- 
 tionary process '.uider way at the present time will render qnite unne- 
 cessaiy. It is merely requisite for a significant smile to be exchanged 
 in passing, and to look back after passing and the absurdity of an 
 introduction is done away with. Permil: me to ask how a boy would 
 know that a girl will become a partner in such a sin if he did not receive 
 some such intimation from the girl herself. I am not as old as Methu- 
 selah, yet I can remember when it was considered necessary for those 
 of opposite sexes to be introduced before they considered themselves 
 acquainted. 
 
 As demonstrating that I am not alone in my opinions of modern 
 women and their ideas of moral training, I submit the folllowing from 
 the Toronto Empire : 
 
 In the Peterboro' Review appears a lon^ letter from an " Anxiou!! Mother," offering 
 "sincere and hearty (hanks to the Town Council for the great measure of moral reform they 
 have enacted, nanielv, the curfew bell." The " Anxious Mother " goes on to say that " without 
 some legislation of tKis kind it would be almost impossible in this advanced age for Christian 
 parents to properly bring up their children in the way they should go " That such opinions are 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 115 
 
 pretty generally entertained there is no denying, but when we come to examine some of the 
 reasons underlying them, the subject gathers interest. The *' Anxious Mother " continues : 
 
 " I am myself the mother of six children, all boys, the youngest six and the eldest under 
 sixteen, so that you will see that my responsibility is great if I am to rightly train " those whom 
 God has given me." As I am a member of the w.C.T U., the Riyal Templars of Temperance, 
 the Epworth League, the Endeavor Society, the Woman's Rights Association, the Society for 
 the Home training of the Young in Africa, etc, I find it impossible to give close attention to 
 my family without neglecting my duties to the societies of which I am a member, and in many 
 of them an office bearer." Who would have thought of Dickens' missionary spirit. Mrs. Jellyby, 
 turning up in Peterboro' ? 
 
 I do not believe that any woman ever wrote the foregoing, but it 
 certainly demonstrates that the idea is gaining ground that women of 
 the present day are too prone to poke their noses into other people's 
 business in the way of advocating I'rohibitionand Enfranchisement and 
 such fads as bring them into notoriety, while their children are free to 
 run the streets as they like. It is simply what the times are coming to ; 
 women must interest themselves in the business of other people, and 
 ask the law to do the duty they should perform towards their children. 
 
 If exception should be taken that I have no i:ight to advocate a 
 system of toleration of houses of ill-fame, or that a work of this kind 
 has no right to contain a chapter on this subject, permit me to point to 
 stories of sensual filth, placed upon the markets by religious associa- 
 tions who made the proud boast of having disposed of circulations of 
 upwards of one hundred thousand copies, and to state moreover that 
 large numbers of persons of alleged respectability did not scruplt to 
 attend " lectures " where extracts were read from such receptacles of 
 filth whose aim was to cast aspersion on the Church of Rome. These 
 aspersions were made in a general way, and were not compromising upon 
 anyone, but every statement I have made in this work is undeniably 
 and absolutely true, and any young man who reads this article will 
 know and agree that it is so, yet I do not pretend to be like Dumas' 
 young hero who agreed that it was possible there might be women and 
 girls who were virtuous, but he had never met any. 
 
 While I do not wish to be regarded as one of those odious char> 
 acters, a moral teacher with a mission, a class of people I have always 
 detested, I consider the system I am advocating would be a proper one, 
 and far less prolific of moral destruction than what now prevails. It is 
 true that staff inspector Archibald states that he would not countenance 
 such an order of things. That is nothing. Similarly a correspondent 
 in the Telegram takes strong exception to the report of the Chief of 
 Police in reference to the social evil, and takes high ground in respect 
 to the suppression of houses of ill-fame. These people are about as 
 competent to judge of such matters as a child shut up in an Assyrian 
 museum until twenty years of age would be. How should they know 
 the desires or passions of the human heart, when association with the 
 young of both sexes and a careful study of physiognomy can alone 
 enable one to read the thoughts and comprehend the thousand longings 
 of youth. Yet they constitute themselves arbiter and judge of what 
 should be and what should not be done for their moral welfare, without 
 any knowledge of human passion. Let any young man of ordinary 
 
lie OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 intelligence and perception make intimate friends with half a dozen 
 boys of from sixteen to eighteen years of age, and having won their 
 confidence place no restraint upon their speech. He will learn more in 
 a month, than twenty years of theory will teach him. I give you a 
 quotation from one of Gaboriou's works showing one of his characters, 
 and it will explain my meaning : 
 
 She was the seventh daughter of a poor Protestant clergyman in the neighborhood of 
 London, and had spent her youth in waiting lii<e the princesses in fairy tales, the youn? and 
 handsome hero who would realize her dreams. He never came, but poverty did She had been 
 compelled to accept a p'ace as governess, and had passed many years in silent resignation. In 
 the evening when she was alone in her bed-room she bolted the door, and compensated herself 
 for all the annoyances of the dav by throwing herself with avidity into novel reading She fancied 
 that from these nocturnal studies she had acquired a thorough knowledge of the world, of life 
 and of passion, and above all felt that she had stored her mind with all sorts of expedients and 
 was ready to meet any emergency. 
 
 That describes your public moralist precisely. Theoretically and 
 in his own mind he knows everything. Practically he knows nothing. 
 
 Then the airs these people give themselves in discussing public 
 questions is rather an advance upon the Pharisees of old, who thanked 
 God that they were not as other men. The Social Purity Agitators of 
 London, England, appeared before the licensing Committee of the 
 London County Council, according to the language of the cable letter 
 to the Toronto Globe, and despite the evidence of these people the 
 applications of various music halls for licenses were granted. Each 
 woman who appeared in opposition before the committee said that wh^n 
 she visited the promenades in search of evidence, she herself was the 
 only respectable woman there, a statement that was so sweeping in its 
 character that it did not meet with belief. The men who testified in 
 behalf of the society gave evidence similar to thit of the women wit- 
 nesses. Their apparent self conceit and self righteousness had a bad 
 effect upon a majority of the committee, and, despite their evidence 
 the licenses were granted. 
 
 It would seem that in Canada too the evidence of this class of 
 people is considered of so little value that the billiard license fee has 
 been reduced in Welland, Ontario, Canada, from $200 to $75, although 
 a lai^e delegation from the W.C.T.U., and several representatives of the 
 different churches were present to oppose it. 
 
 Your public moralist is so remarkably intelligent and knows so 
 much that when their side of the case was presented they were not 
 believed, although the council one year did refuse licenses to the music 
 halls. Or, again, is it not just possible that they considered such places 
 a social necessity, presuming for the sake of argument that they are 
 immoral, on the same grounds as I advocate the toleration of houses of 
 ill-fame. When the law was first passed permitting cities and towns 
 to adopt the ringing of the curfew bell the W.C.T.U. lost no time in 
 airing their views on the subject and advocating its establishment in 
 Toronto. They seemed to have about as much weight with Toronto's 
 council as their contemporaries in London and Welland had had. for 
 they did not get it, the Telegram promptly informing them that Tor- 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 117 
 
 cnto's police force had something else to do besides running in children 
 of tender years who were on the streets after a certain hour. 
 
 At the Social Purity Congress held in Baltimore Rev. C. M. Watch, 
 of Brighton, Ontario, read an interesting paper on social purity work 
 in Canada. He eulogised the moral sentiment of the Canadian people, 
 and said if the whole Dominion bhould speak at the ballot box on the 
 temperance question there would be 100,000 majority in favor of pro- 
 hibition. He congratulated his people on having no general divorce 
 law. To procure a divorce he explained requires a special act of Par- 
 liament, and the result is that only 48 applications have been filed in 
 ten years. Forty of these were granted or about one for every six or 
 seven thousand marriages. The speaker paid a tribute to Mr. John 
 Charlton, member of Parliament, for favoring legislation on social purity 
 questions, and criticised other legislators for indifference to the import- 
 ance of a proper age of consent law, and to the one standard of morals; 
 The city of Toronto also received Dr. Watch's hearty commendation 
 as being the best governed city in the Dominion. The morality depart- 
 ment in charge of Staff- Inspector Archibald, was highly praised, and 
 when the speaker said there was not a known house of ill-fame in that 
 city the congress applauded. 
 
 He did not mention, however, that Mr. Charlton has stated from 
 his seat in Parliament that he favored a divorce Court in Canada. 
 
 The following is a solicitor's opinion on American divorces : 
 
 The Canadian courts recognize the validity of judgments and decrees of American courts 
 if regularly and properly gi anted by such courts If the decree of divorce was regularly granted 
 by a court of competent jurisdiction in the United States, and for a cause which would be 
 deemed a sufHcient ground for the granting uf a divorce by the Canadian Parliament, such a 
 decree could be pleaded as a defence in case of a prosecution for bigamy in Canada. 
 
 It is quite true, as Mr. Watch states that Canada has no general 
 divorce law, but Canadians who desire divorces get them just as Am- 
 ericans do — in Chicago and other states where they can be obtained — 
 and the non-existence of a divorce law is no bar to divorce being ob- 
 tained. No less a person than Mrs. George E. Foster, the wife of the 
 ex-Minister of Finance of Canada, obtained a divorce from her first 
 husband in Chicago. She could not have obtained it in Canada, as her 
 first husband is simply a fugitive, but she did so in Chicago. Mrs. E. 
 F. Blackstock, of Toronto, also obtained a divorce from her husband 
 George T. Blackstock of 1 oronto on the grounds of non-support, in the 
 court of Newport, R.I. What these people have done other Canadians 
 have done, can do and will do. Hence a divorce court is not a 
 necessity in Canada. 
 
 The statistical year book gives figures about divorce in Canada. It 
 shows that since Confederation Parliament has had 57 divorces, of which 
 40 were for Ontario couples, 14 for Quebec, 2 for Manitoba and i from 
 the Territories, Divorce courts have been operating in three provinces, 
 with the result that 82 divorces were granted in Nova Scotia, 64 in New 
 Brunswick and 3 1 in British Columbia. 
 
 When he speaks of there not being a known house of ill-fame in 
 Toronto, I respectfully refer him to my work, and ask him to consider 
 
118 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 the reasons why there are none, assuming for the sake of ai^ument that 
 his assertion is true, which I add is not. His commendation ol Toronta 
 is decidedly rt freshing, and I submit the following as a criminal docket 
 taken from a Toronto paper about the time he made his statement : 
 
 Queen v Joseph 6. Blackburn, defiling a child under 14 years of age, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. (ieorge Brown and Richard Sadler, removing marks from stamps, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. [. B. Blackburn, rape, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. William Curry, arson, true bill. 
 
 Queen v Harry May, roljbery from the person and violence, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. Harry May, Fred Chambers, George White and George Badgeley, robbery 
 with violence, true bill. 
 
 Queen V. Fred Chambers, rape, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. George Badgeley, rape, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. Marry May. rape, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. Badgely, White, Chambers and May, rape, true bill. 
 
 Quten V. William Broom, assault with intent, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. Frank Smith, assault with intent, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. William Broom and Frank Smith, murder, true bill. 
 • Queen v. W. J. Kramer and Frank Watts, engraving instruments of forgery, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. W. J Kramer and Edmund Barber, unlawfully using instruments of forgery^ 
 true bill. 
 
 Queen v. David Cooper and W. J. Kramer, forgery and uttering, true bill. 
 
 Queen v Thomas Smith, John Crawford, W. J. Kramer, forgery and uttering, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. W. J. Kramer, po.osessing instruments of forgery, true bill. 
 
 Queen v John Crawford and William I. Dickson, unlawfully using instruments of 
 forgery, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. William I. Dickson, having in possession instruments of forgery, true bill. 
 
 Queen v. Frank Watts, having in possession instruments of forgery, true bill. 
 
 Queen t. Edmund Barber, having in possession instruments of forgery, true bilL . < 
 
 Queen V. Thomas Smith, uttering, no bill. > 
 
 Queen v. George White, rap**, true bill. 
 
 License Inspector Dexter scored a point against a number of illegal liquor sellers. Mrs. 
 Ann Whalen 15 Centre avenue, was fined $50 and costs or three months ; Peter Green, of the 
 Green Bush, York street, the same amount, and Mike McGorry, of 184 York street, Sioo and 
 costs or three months ; John Daly, of 156 1-2 York street, was convicted of illegally selling 
 liquor. He also pleaded guilty to having been convicted on a similar charge in March last. In 
 cases of a second ofience the Magistrate is precluded from imposing a fine; the penalty being at 
 least four months in prison. So Daly gets the four months. There were two other charges 
 against " Jack," to which be pleaded guilty, also again admitting previous convictions. He got 
 four months on each of these, and the three sentences run consecutively, making one year Daly 
 will have to stay in jail. 
 
 A recent issue of the News stated that there were 80 cases of 
 illegal selling of liquor to be tried. 
 
 In giving a report on city Mission work the News said that one 
 clergyman declared that Toronto slums were worse than those of 
 Belfast. 
 
 Very much to be commended, is it not } If Toronto is a moral city, 
 what under heaven must an immoral city be like ? 
 
 It is thus with those illusionary theorists who attempt to dictate 
 and advise on subjects which their limited understandings could never 
 grasp. What is your opinion of Mr. Watch's remarks? 
 
 I think I may consistently say that any woman or girl, once entered 
 upon a life of shame, however glittering it may be at the outset, her 
 fate is certain, unless she anticipates her final doom by suicide. She 
 can rarely reform if she would. Few will help her back to the paths 
 of right. There is only one means of safety, and that is to avoid the 
 first step. Once place your foot on the downward part, and you are 
 lost forever. It is generally hard to learn the true history of the lost 
 
i;)F TOIIONTO THE GOOD. 119 
 
 women, for nearly all wish to make their past lot appear better than 
 it usually is, with the melancholy hope of elevating themselves in the 
 estimation of their present acquaintances. It may safely be asserted, 
 however, that the majority of them come from the humbler walks of 
 life. Women of former position and refinement are the exceptions, for 
 society the higher it is will condone and sympathize with the misfort- 
 unes of one of its own daughters, while no language is strong enough to 
 express the righteous indignation called forth by the disgrace of her of 
 humble origin. Poverty and a desire to gratify a taste for fine clothes 
 are among the chief causes of pro titution in this as in all cities, but at 
 the same time, proprietresses of houses of all classes spare no means to 
 draw into their nets all who will listen to them. 
 
 The following cases will, perhaps, not be amiss in demonstrating 
 the cogency of my contentions. The first came to my attention after 
 1 had completed my previous work on this subject, and the second one 
 I am giving to strengthen my position, and it will prove more effect- 
 ually than any amount of theorizing, the truthfulness of my assertions : 
 
 The disaster on the Detroit river, near Belle Isle Park, by which a youns man and his 
 companion a young woman, lost their lives, has developed, upon the finding of the young 
 woman's body, into a romantic tragedy of thrilling interest It will be remembered that a Mr. 
 Morris, a hotel keeper from Jackson, Mich , August Reitz and an unknown young woman were 
 boating on the River. They endeavoured to catch a tow line from a passing steamer, were 
 overturned, and Keitz and the girl were drowned Every effort to discover the identity of the 
 girl proved unvailing. This morning the body of Keitz was discovered near Amherstburg. It 
 was in fearful condition and was buried at once. A few hours later the body of a young woman 
 was found near Wyandotte. It was badly decomposed, ' 'ut was identified as that of Emma 
 Fox, of 300 Albert street this city, and also as the body of the young woman of the Sunday 
 disaster. In searching for further information the correspondent brought to light, the downfall, 
 disgrace and subsequent death of a Canadian girl who came here some mr>nths a;o to seek her 
 fortune alone and without friends. Emma Fox, as she was known here, was the daughter of 
 we'l-to do people named Fulton, living in Middlesex Tiring of her home in the country, she 
 went to Drumbo, Ont , and later to Toronto, where she was employed in the office of Wyld, 
 Brock & Darling as a typewriter. Her true name was Edith Fulton, but she frequently went 
 by different names. Naturally of a vivacious nature, she rapidly made friends, principally among 
 a fast set of young men in Toronto. One, a clerk, became infatuated with hrr, and her downfall 
 soon followed. He had influential friends and parents, and when they discovered the intrigue, 
 the girl was compelled to leave Toronto. She came to Detroit, where she secured employment 
 and was prospering until she met Lou Fos, a railroad breakesman. She fell in love with him, 
 and under promise of marriage in the near future, went to live with him at 300 Abbott street. 
 A short time after Fox was killed while coupling cars at Twenty-fifth street, this city. Again 
 thrown on her resources, the young girl fell into fast company, and ".as frequently seen in the 
 company of different young men. The body exhibited no evidences of foul play, although the 
 mouth was tertibly swollen, and one eye hung from its socket, and about half an inch of the 
 scalp was hairless. These injuries very probably were done to the body by the water and objects 
 with which it came in contact in the water. The girl was five feet three inches tall, of good 
 form, and would weigh about no pounds. She had long dark brown hair, and was probably 
 between the ages of 18 and 20. She has a grandmother living in Windsor. 
 
 The above is taken from a Detroit paper, and will clearly prove 
 that girls who are presumably respectable, but who are not really so, 
 take the place of those who are professionally unchaste. 
 
 The second case even more clearly proves my contention. 
 
 Some few years ago two young men of about twenty years of age, 
 asked me to accompany them to a house of ill-fame, and I consented 
 to do so, suggesting that we should go to 248 Front street, or as the 
 new number makes it now, 292. It was agreed that we should go 
 on a Wednesday night, the conclusion being arrived at on the Friday 
 
120 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 evening preceding. On Monday morning one of the young men in- 
 formed me that he and his friend and some others of their companions 
 were at the house of one of their young lady friends the evening pre- 
 vious where, altogether, there were some ten or twelve of both sexes. 
 During the course of the evening one of them called across the room 
 to his friend : 
 
 "George, where is Mr going to take us to on Wednesday 
 
 night ? " 
 
 The other answered mysteriously : • 
 
 " Is it 248 Front or Queen East we are going ? " 
 
 The young ladies listened attentively to this dialogue, and at length 
 one of them exclaimed : 
 
 " I know where you are going. If you go there I'll never speak 
 to you again." 1 
 
 On Wednesday at noon I was called to the telephone. 
 
 " Is that Mr ? " came from the other end. It was a girl's voice, 
 
 and two or three voices were mingling together, with " Is he there ? " 
 " What did he say ? " &c. &c. 
 ' "Yes," I answered. 
 
 *' Well, this is Harry Smith speaking. Which one are we going 
 to to-night ? " 
 
 I did not wish to call out the number, so that everyone in the 
 office could hear it, so I replied: 
 
 " Oh, tne Grand." 
 
 " No, no," she exclaimed impatiently, "you know what I mean. 
 Is it 248 Front, or Queen East ? " and then she added in a lower tone 
 of voice, apparently to her companions : " he knows it isn't Harry that 
 is speaking." 
 
 After a few more remarks of an irrevelant nature, she rang off, 
 but we did not go to a house of ill-fame that night, nor any other night, 
 and to any one of average understanding it will be clear that young 
 men who associated with young ladies such as these would have no 
 reason to go to such places. 
 
 A day or two afterwards I met my friends and they stated that 
 these young ladies on hearing the street numbers, examined the direct- 
 ory, and having found the names of the people living there, made it 
 their business to go and find out all about them. 
 
 Young ladies in the humbler walks of life ? 
 
 Not at all. They were the daughters of well-to-do men in the 
 city, some of them still attending school, and they were members of 
 the Jarvis street Baptist church and the Bond street Congregational. 
 The mother of one of the young ladies in question had died about the 
 time I speak of, and the house became the rendez-vous for the crowd 
 to meet at. 
 
 I could give you the names of these people quite easily if I wished 
 to do so, and if it would serve any good purpose, but I have no doubt 
 if they ever read this article they will recall the circumstances, and I 
 took the precaution to obtain the full and explicit information I have 
 volunteered to you. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 121 
 
 Can you wonder that such a state of affairs exists ? 
 
 These girls were permitted absolute liberty of action, out all hours 
 of the day or night, free to roam as they chose, while their saintly 
 mothers were doubtless too much occupied with temperance work and 
 women's enfranchisement to give attention to anything so common 
 place as their daughters, when there is no newspaper notoriety conected 
 with the fulfillment of such duties. 
 
 I do not doubt that if the most overwelming evidence were given 
 to the mothers of these girls, they would still any " it is not so." It was 
 Gaboriau who said : " Evidence will crush the most obstinate man, he 
 ceases to struggle, he makes a confession. A woman scoffs at evidence. 
 Show her the sun, and she will close her eyes, and say " it is night." 
 Men plan and combine different systems of defence according to the 
 social position in which they were born. Women have but one system 
 whatever their condition in life. They deny everything and always, 
 and they weep." Prove or them the statements I have made, and they 
 are like those people who answer you : '• Impossible, no such thing 
 ever happened to my laundress." 
 
 It was the cynical Balzac who said : " There is one thing admirable 
 in women. They never reason about their blameworthy actions. Even 
 in their dissimulation there is an element of sincerity." 
 
 It is astonishing, however, that no matter how blind a woman may 
 be, she can always see the defects of her neighbours' daughters. Some 
 time ago a young friend of mine showed me a picture, drawn by a friend 
 of his, and which he thought to be quite a work of art. 
 
 " So-and-so did this, it's good isn't it ? " 
 
 I need not describe the picture more than to say that part of it 
 was a figure of a nude female, and the rest of the picture need not be 
 mentioned. But that it was well sketched, the could be no doubt. That 
 it was grossly indecent, it is unnecessary to add. 
 
 A few days later the same young man came to me with a smile on 
 his face and said his mother had taken the picture out of his p oket 
 one night, while he was asleep. 
 
 " She asked me, if I had a picture of a girl drawn with a lead 
 pencil, and I answered no, but that I had picked up a piece of paper a 
 few days before, and thought it was an exercise belonging to some of 
 the school children, and put it in my pocket. But I said I had never 
 looked at it." 
 
 "It was a dirty, filthy picture," his mother had an.«wered, " and I 
 
 thought it just about such a thing as Maud would be likely to 
 
 give you." 
 
 You see how able this lady was to correctly fathom the depths of 
 immorality that the young lady whose name she mentioned had pos- 
 sibly sunk to. Yet I know that her own daughter was carrying on a 
 surreptitious correspondence with a young man whose morals were at 
 least shady. Singular is it not ? 
 
 In the course of a recent address the Bishop of Algoma said he 
 had known cases where young girls ranging from 12 to 15 years of age 
 
122 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 were compelled by their mothers to produce fr< n hiding places in their 
 bedrooms books, circulars and pictures of such a foul character that 
 anyone with the least modesty would blush to acknowledge having 
 seen them. 
 
 At a certair skating rink last winter my attention was called to a 
 handsome, well built young man of abc it twenty. He stood in the 
 centre of the ice, and braced himself strongly as though warding off a 
 collision, his stomach protruding. Presently a young miss of about 
 seventeen, after several vigorous strokes to get up speed, and having 
 succeeded, ran plump into him. This was repeated several times, much 
 to the amusement of the spectators. Shortly afterwards a young lady 
 friend admonished the giddy miss, and asked her is she had no thought 
 of her reputation. 
 
 " My reputation," the other answered flippantly, " I don't give a 
 damn for that, I lost it years ago." 
 
 This flippant young miss is decended from one of the most pro- 
 minent professional men in Canada, and if I gave her name, I believe 
 it would make the readers' hair stand. 
 
 Why is it ? God only knows. When the prophet of old said the 
 human heart is deceitful and desperately wicked, he knew whereof he 
 spoke. In somt natures the love of or passion for a human being will 
 works marvels which neither the fear of God, nor the hope of heaven, 
 nor yet the promptings of self-respeet have the power to accomplish. 
 
 Almost any boy or girl of the present age, lamentable as it may 
 be to say so, has far more experience or knowledge than the oldest 
 libertine of a generation ago. I heard the conversation of some boys 
 who had reached the ripe and experienced age of sixteen oi" seventeen 
 years, the subject under discussion being girls of their acquaintance. 
 One of them had hazarded Ihe information that one miss of his 
 acquaintance had blushed. 
 
 " Blushed I" repeated one of the others, with unmitigated scorn, 
 " her blush. Why, I never saw a girl yet who could blush." I mention 
 this as showing the exalted opinions boys of the present day have for 
 girls and women. 
 
 Dr. Napheys it is who states that a wise provision of nature ordains 
 that a woman shall be sought. She flees, and man pursues. The folly 
 of modern reformers who would annul this provision is evident Were 
 it done away with, man, ever prone to yield to woman's solicitation, 
 and then most prone when yielding is most dangerous would fritter 
 away his powers at an early age, and those very impulses which nature 
 has given to perpetuate the race would bring about its destruction. He 
 adds that woman is endowed with a sense of shame, an invincible 
 modesty, which is her greatest protection, and her greatest charm. 
 
 " She flees, and man pursues ! " cries Dr. Napheys. 
 
 Alone in his study he may assume that what should be b, but let 
 Dr. Napheys or anyone else visit any place where young people cong- 
 regate and see if he is correct. 
 
 But his book was writen in 1867, quite a generation ago. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 123 
 
 I had a conversation with a boy who was attending the Collegiate 
 Institute, and in the course of his remarks he told me some curious 
 things. It appears that his class has for one of its texts books, the story 
 of Hiawatha. I believe that is the work, at all events, it is an Indian 
 name. He said that there was not a boy in that class of any age who 
 did not make it his special business to markedly accentuate that part- 
 icular passage which says, " and women great with child," for the edifi- 
 cation of the girls in the class. He stated moreover that every boy 
 in the school with whom he was on terms of intimacy was very well 
 up in scripture. Not Christ's sermon on the Mount, where we are told 
 of our duties in life, but such passages as contain what in any other 
 work would be termed unfit for publication. That lad knew all the 
 stpry of Potiphai s wife and Joseph, the story of Lot's daughters, all 
 the suggestiven ss of Deuteronomy, and could tell the book and chapter 
 where all such passages as suggested filth occurred, yet he could tell 
 nothing of the divine revelation to St. John, nor those admonitions that 
 are intended to keep people in the path of right. I do not pretend to 
 account for this, but I mention it to show you what the tendencies of 
 the times are, and as showing that ordinary literature is rather flat for 
 the youth of the present day. In some correspondence that took plaee 
 in the Empire some time ago, I saw that in one of the Methodist Sab- 
 bath schools they have in their library the glorious Revelations of 
 Maria Monk. So that even the churches are determined to cater to 
 the popular demand for literature that is somewhat shady. Still it 
 indicates the trend of the times. 
 
 There is another position from which this case is to be viewed, 
 and that is where medical science is called upon to step in and save 
 from disgrace young women whose indiscretion has led them to seek 
 in criminal means the way out of their difficulties. 
 
 In conversation with a newspaper man some time ago, he stated 
 that in the course of the day he had been called upon to make three 
 calls on as many different physicians. Their conversation had turned 
 upon abortions, and the first doctor had stated that he had applications 
 from some twelve or thirteen different girls to have operations perform- 
 ed upon them. The newspaper man on making the second call intro- 
 duced the subject and was there informed that the same state of affairs 
 had been his experience, and the third was the same way. That they 
 had refused to take any such steps goes without saying. 
 
 But another physician gives an entirely different case and I am 
 impelled to give the whole matter just as it was told to me : 
 
 " Some time ago, a young lady, whose mother keeps a boarding 
 house not a thousand miles from my house, called me in a great hurry 
 and asked me to go at once to their house, where her sister was lying 
 very sick in the throes of childbirth. I put in my instruments and left 
 the house with her, and then proceeded to the bedroom where the 
 sister was lying. She was in the throes of childbirth, sure enough, and 
 in a short time was delivered of a chilf', still-born. I had some difficulty 
 in petting the thing out of the house, but I succeeded and swore that 
 
124 OP TORONTO TUB GOOD. 
 
 I would never do a thing like that again. But that only proves how 
 easily pledges arc made and broken, especially with yourself, for only 
 a short time afterwards the one who had been delivered of the child 
 called on me. 
 
 " I hope it isn't a case of the same kind as I had before." 
 " Well, yes," she answered, " it is, only this time it is my sister." 
 " In spite of my declaration to the contrary I went, and this case 
 was even worse than the other. The head of the child was off, and she 
 was having a terrible time of it. To make matters worse her mother 
 was in the room, and could not be got rid of. At least I hit upon a 
 scheme and told the old woman that I must have some v-rry strong 
 black tea, and though she tried hard to get the other girl to go and 
 make it, I finally prevailed upon her togo herself, and then I managed 
 the rest. Pretty risky, you'll say, but the peculiar part of it is, or per- 
 haps I should say the least peculiar part of it is, that I never got a cent 
 for either case." 
 
 I give you the following clipping from the Telegram, coming im- 
 mediately upon the arrest of Dr. Andrews, who was recently tried and 
 acquitted of the charges preferred against him. I shall make no com- 
 ment on this case, more than to draw your attention to the circumstance 
 of the incriminating letters that were found in Dr. Andrews' house after 
 the arrest. If they prove nothing, they at least demonstrate that the 
 fact previously mentioned in this article that the extent of the nation's 
 immorality cannot in any wise be measured by the number of the fre- 
 quenters of disorderly houses, must be only too true : 
 
 The detective department presented a heartrending spectacle such as is seldom witness- 
 ed when a respectable man saw Inspector Stark and related the story of another sunsational 
 case, involving seduction and crime, and a mysterious disappearance of (he unfortunate victim. 
 
 Nellie Lafontaine, belonging tu Peiferlaw, Out., came to Toronto in September of this 
 year and went to live with her brother-in-law, John O'Connell, 40 Gladstone avenue, who is a 
 shoemaker About a week or ten days ago she was taken to Dr. Andrews' place, 237 Shaw 
 street by her sister ar.d placed in his care, and $50 paid him by Mrs. O'Connell. She was 
 pregnant at the time, and the object was to restore her to her normal condition, the same a^ the 
 unfortunate Lucy Denning. As soon as O'Connell found out what had been done, he went to 
 Dr. Andrews' house on Wednesday last,.and demanded possession of the girl and $$0, but could 
 get no satinfaction. He at last threatened Dr. Andrews with police proceedings, and this is 
 the case which is believed to have frightened the Dr. to take his departure, and not the Denn- 
 ing case at all. Miss Lafontaine has not been heard of since the doctor took charge of her, and 
 both her sister and brother-in-law are greatly alarmed about her whereabouts. " we are ready 
 to hear anything now," said Mrs. O'Connell, with tears in her eyes. " My poor sister is gone, 
 but heaven alone knows where. Perhaps she, too, is. . . . is" then she broke down completely. 
 
 Inspector Stark took possession of all the correspondence in the house, which consisted 
 of between 200 or 350 letters, involving beyond doubt a number of criminal operations, per- 
 formed both on married and single females, all over the country. Some of these letters are 
 couched in the plainest language by educated as well as ignorant women, writtei. confidentially, 
 but confessing to the greatest acts of shame and seduction, and offering to pay large sums of 
 money for advice and successful treatment. Some contain grateful acknowledgement of what 
 the doctor has done for them, and begging him to keep their secrets from the world. Others 
 ask for immediate advice, and suggest secret interviews, when the would be patients would be 
 the least likely observed. Altogetner they form a revelation which will form the d.irkest blot 
 on society at large and shock the community from end to end of the land The detectives are 
 hard at work following up certain clues that promise to develop highly sensatiuiul features 
 in the case. 
 
 If people run away with the idea that no abortion is committed in 
 Canada, it only serves to demonstrate how extremely small is their 
 range of experience and observation, as I happen to know. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 12ft 
 
 What does an advertisement like this mean ? 
 
 TANSY AND PENNYROYAL PILLS. 
 
 Never fails. Any stage. Thousands of happy ladies. .Safe, sure and absohitely harmless. 
 These pills are positively superior to all others. Many (housandii of ladies in this country and 
 Europe have secretly endorsed these pil' - iScware of dangcrou.i substitutes and .mitations. 
 Price 2 by mail, or send stamp for particulars. Sold only by 
 
 In the same way as a solicitor prepares his case for presentation to 
 the courts by his counsel, so have I endeavoured to give you all the 
 particulars in support of my contentions. In mentioning the circum- 
 stances of young ladies I have given you simply what I know to be 
 true, and while it is extremely regrettable that it is so, I think it must 
 be admitted that a very serious state of affairs exists. If what I have 
 mentioned to you is truth, how much more could be said by others 
 younger than T, and who have had later experience. That laws will 
 ever succeed in preventing the commission of the 7th Commandment, 
 I do not believe. When young girls, in spite of the teachings of the 
 laws of God run into exposure, how can any human law prevent their 
 falling ? As centuries ago Canute sat at the side of the sea, and told 
 the waves to recede, so might the police force and those who make 
 these laws stand at the foot of Niagara with a broom and tell the water 
 to go back. I have placed before you the facts as the king proved to 
 his followers, that to stop the waves was the power of the Almighty 
 only, and he demonstrated to them by practical illustration how base 
 was the flattery they wished to bestow upon him. In presenting my 
 facts and figures, I have endeavoured to demonstrate the impossibility 
 of its suppression, and I think I may say consistently that I have been 
 successful. My information is not in any respect overdrawn. It is 
 what I could prove before any judge. I know the names of every one 
 whose case I have mentioned. That it would serve my good purpose 
 to state them I do not believe, hence I have not done so. 
 
 Coming to a discussion of this matter from a standpoint of social 
 ethics, it must be acknowledged that the latter day opportunities 
 presented to the female sex for earning a livelihood, are bound to cul- 
 minate into a degeneration of the race. I possess no statistics to show 
 the ratio of marriages compared with previous years, but I can state 
 from personal observation that there are fewer marriages amongst people 
 of the middle classes than formerly. While there may be various means 
 of accounting for this, it must occur to the average beholder that the 
 great majority of people in thisclas.^ cannot afford the luxury of marry- 
 ing. Men who formerly held positions, or more properly, positions that 
 were formerly held by men are now filled by women, and nowadays it 
 is much more a problem for a man to decide what he is to do with his 
 boys than with his girls. The latter fill positions in offices, stores, and 
 warehouses, and at salaries that men would scarcely look at much less 
 think of attempting to suport a family upon. The result is precisely 
 what so-called social teachers predicted as a result of licensing houses 
 of ill- fame. If licensing houses of ill- fame decrease the possibilities of 
 marriage, so also does the emancipation of women. It is possible, of 
 
126 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 course, that the woman of the future may consider herself entitled by 
 virtue of her ability to earn a livelihood, to ask a man to marry her, but 
 it is in the highest degree unlikely. 
 
 Human passion is quite as strong in the man or woman of slender 
 means and curtailed salary as it is in those of more opulent circum- 
 stances consequently if men and women are precluded from marrying 
 on account of purely financial conditions, it is quite probable and ex- 
 perience has proven that it is so, that the gratification of such will not 
 be debarred by such a simple matter as the absence of the marriage tie. 
 It is reasonable to suppose that when women, as they at present do, 
 outnumber men, a large number of them are certain to fall. That this 
 is so I am aware, but it cannot be proven by statistics nor even by the 
 police records, for such cases do not find their way into the police courts, 
 except in very rare instances, and then only occasionally when trouble 
 shows itself. Individually, however, the vast majority of readers will 
 know that it is so, and would have little trouble in tracing circumstances 
 such as I mention to people even of their own acquaintance. This 
 applies, doubtless, more to men than to women, but both will recognize 
 the truthfulness of my assertions. In a recent issue of the Mail and 
 Empire, a correspondent in addressing the editress of the Woman's 
 Kingdom stated that she was unmarried and likely to remain so, and 
 asked if the editress considered it admissible for her to indulge in illicit 
 love? In reply she was told "No," and the editress added that she 
 received large numbers of such letters. 
 
 I clipped the following from a city paper, and it explains itself: 
 
 Boston, Mass., Sept. 27. — A Landladies' Union, the purpose of which is to secure a 
 system of municipal license and medical i nspection for houses of prostitution in Boston, was 
 organized yesterday afternoon. The meeting was attended by 23 women, who, before the police 
 closed them out, kept the most " respectable " resorts in the city Resolutions were adopted 
 that this illicit traffic has not been suppressed, but transferred to other localities, and that many 
 girls, formerly protected by the landladies, are now destitute, homeless and sick. A committee 
 to lay the petition of the union before the Board of Police was appointed. 
 
 So that I am not alone in suggesting or advocating what I do and 
 it is to be remembered that this class of women are in a position better 
 to understand the conditions they point out as existing than any 
 other class of people. 
 
 In concluding this chapter on the Social Evil, I desire to say that 
 to the best of my ability 1 have presented my case to the public for 
 them to judge whether in the light of the circumstances I have laid 
 before them, it would not be better to give the matter a trial. I ask 
 the careful consideration of every man, woman, boy or girl of my con- 
 tentions, and a fair criticism and a fair discussion of the system I ad- 
 vocate, more especially from the judiciary of the country, as they are 
 less likely to be jeoparoized than the clergy would undoubtedly be, 
 should they agree with me, but I simply ask a careful perusal and those 
 who do not agree with me can at least acknowledge that there is a wide 
 field for parents to guard their children, and householders to guard the 
 safety of those who enter their service. Even if I succeed in impressing 
 upon these people the desirability of looking more carefully after those 
 
OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 127 
 
 they employ whose temptations to sin are greatest, I shall feel that 
 my work is not in vain. My advocation of tolerating, licensing or 
 inspecting houses of ill-fame is because I believe them to be an econo- 
 mic necessity. Did not the Police Magistrate of Montreal or the 
 Recorder as he is called, acknowledge to the Commission of Investiga- 
 tion held there some years ago that there were large numbers of houses 
 of ill-fame known to the police of that city, and they were not molested 
 simply because they were regarded as an absolute necessity. I assert 
 moreover, that the present day theorists are entirely behind the times. 
 Boys and girls of tender years are as well aware of the artificial means 
 by which conception can be prevented as old men of a generation ago. 
 I saw a druggist's advertisement a short time ago in a Toronto paper, 
 with this significant black line : Rubber Goods of ALL KINDS For Sale. 
 There is not a boy in Toronto, I dare say, who does not know what 
 that means. I would not be surprised that many of the men and women 
 in the city have no idea that it is ambiguous, and may mean one thing 
 or another according to the person reading it. A hid of sixteen, a 
 druggist's apprentice informed me that it was incredible the quantity 
 of "rubber goods " they sold. " We sold more of them than anything 
 else," he laughed. 
 
 It may be remarked by those ladies who talk of passing laws 
 restricting this thing and that thing that it is against the law to sell 
 rubber articles such as are advertised. In reply to any such observa- 
 tions, I might say that there is not a boy in the city of Toronto who 
 could not get any such article if he wanted it. The druggist mi:;ht and 
 very possibly would refuse to sell to him, if he did not know him, but 
 the boy could easily get what he wanted from the druggist's apprentice 
 as I happen to know is done. A young fellow of sixteen once handed 
 me a pasteboard coin, silvered over. When I mentioned to him that I 
 saw nothing in the possession of such a coin, he laughed and told me 
 to tear off the outside layer. I did so, and discovered one of the art- 
 icles I have endeavored to describe. I have it in my possession yet, 
 and regard it as a valuable piece of evidence. The boy had obtained 
 it from a lad he knew in a drug store. The use of such articles opens 
 the way for the commission of sin by girls of highest respectability, who 
 fear the results that may ensue from breaking the seventh command- 
 ment. When the possibility of conception is placed beyond all chance 
 — when all danger is removed or obviated — the temptation to sin is 
 augmented to such a degree that hundreds ruu the chance of falling 
 or indeed, they may be said to be innumerable — who from pride and 
 fear would not entertain the idea of sinning at all. Consequently boys 
 and young men, knowing these scruples on the part of young ladies of 
 superior social position, by having these articles in ^heir possession, 
 have their powers of persuasion supplemented a thousand fold. 
 
 I have given you the opinion expressed by the Reverend Father 
 Decarie of St. Henri, and I have demonstrated clearly the truthfulness 
 of the assertions he made, unwelcome as they may appear. But this 
 is to be born in mind : A priest is far better informed on such matters 
 
128 » OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 than any other class of people, my article abundantly proving that it 
 is so. When I undertook to write this work, I entered every avenue 
 that promised to reward my research. I considered no means too in- 
 significant to follow and I place my experiences before you, asking you 
 to judge as to whether my advocation of licensing or tolerating houses 
 of ill-fame would not reduce the immorality that I am prepared to prove 
 exists. I always go to the sources of information when I want it. and 
 I now submit the result, apologising for the length of the chapter, but 
 with the conscientious reason that it could not be discussed in a less 
 space. When the historic Collier said that the vice that is draped in 
 the garb of virtue or has the varnish of an outward refinement laid over 
 its leprosy is tenfold more infectious and destructive than the shameless 
 wickedness which hides its loathsome front, he knew whereof he spoke. 
 Do not my illustrations demonstrate the truthfulness of my assertions? 
 Have I not also proven the truthfulness of Father Decarie's assertion 
 that the extent of the nation's immorality cannot in any wise be mea- 
 sured by the numbers of the frequenters of disorderly houses } One of 
 the most successful novelists of the present day in one of his works proves 
 the accuracy of Mr. Collier's reasoning, when he says : Had he (his 
 hero) remained in England his morals might easily have survived the 
 onslaughts made upon them As he strolled through the unfamiliar 
 streets of Liverpool he was horrified by the women who accosted him, 
 leering with reddened eyes into his face, and breathing brown stout 
 and gin into his nostrils. The highways seemed to be full of them. 
 He wondered if any man could be found so low as to accept the fearful 
 invitations with which his ears had been dinned. Crossing the channel 
 he reached Paris. Strolling with a new sense of delight along the grand 
 boulevards, upon the quays and through the numerous parks, he found 
 women there too — and what an astounding difference! Soft voiced 
 demoiselles, tastily clad, shot glances at him with their bonjours, from 
 which it was net easy to turn away. When he invited one of them, she 
 replied to his interrogations in modest monosyllables that won his 
 Anglo Saxon heart and turned his Anglo Saxon brain. He lived with 
 hf*r for six months. 
 
 If I have overstepped the bonds of good taste in placing my facts 
 before you, or have been too plain spoken in my illustrations, I plead 
 justification by the fact that all I have told you is perfect truth, and I 
 also regret the necessity of having had to speak so plainly. Moreover 
 I feel so strongly on the subject I am advocating that it will be pro- 
 ductive of good. Besides my language is not any stronger than 
 appears in the generality of novels. 
 
 The great inconsistency on the part of so many people lies in the 
 factthct they dread a/^^afaw«. People may feel almost revolted at the 
 idea of houses of ill-fame, yet I have shown that the sin goes on without 
 cessation. Drunkenness, which is not a sin, is looked upon with abhor- 
 rence by Pharisees generally who demand the prohibition of the liquor 
 traffic, but they appear to be quite indifferent to the fates of scores of 
 girls who are going to the bad. 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 129 
 
 For some time past my attention was called to the newspaper 
 reports of sermons by different clergymen, and resolutions by different 
 societies of men and women, from which it would appear that they have 
 been much exercised by the fact that drunken orgies are alleged to 
 have taken place to the bar of the House of Commons, Ottawa, during 
 the first session of ParHament in 1896. At the second session of Par- 
 hament in 1896, it was decided to close the bar. The Prime Minister 
 also promising during this session that he would take a plebiscite as to 
 public feeling in regard to Prohibition, and if the people decided in 
 favor of Prohibition, ''">ey should have it. The Women's Christian 
 Temperance Union 01 '^awa have also prevailed upon the city council 
 to have the curfew beP rung at nine o'clock at night so that all children 
 under a certain age must be off the streets at that hour or be arrested. 
 All of which are regarded by advocates of these particular fads as bril- 
 liant diplomatic triumphs. Let us assume for the sake of argument 
 that every member of the House of Commons came into his seat intox- 
 icated is there any divine law that was broken by thsir so doing ? There 
 was not a breach of any of God's Commandments had every man in 
 the house been drunk, but simply and purely because the public could 
 see it if they were drunk, were these people exercised. It looked bad. 
 Let us leave the House of Commons for a few moments and step down 
 to Wellington street upon which the Parliament buildings face, and 
 which has received the suggestive title of Whitechapel. We will com- 
 mence at the West end of the grounds. On the corner in the shade of 
 the trees are four or five boys talking to, or rather blackguarding two 
 girls in short dresses, who seem to enjoy it just as much as the boys, 
 for they laugh just as gleefully as the boys do. At about every hundred 
 yards one or two boys are standing like sentinels in the shadows of the 
 fence pillars. Are they there for any good purpose, or are they not ? 
 A girl of some twenty years passes and one boy makes some remark 
 to her commencing : 
 
 "Hello L...; " the rest of which I could not discern. To 
 
 which the young lady answers sufficiently audible for anyone to hear : 
 
 "Go to , you " at which the boys laugh. 
 
 " Who is the girl ? " I ask, and one lad gives me her name, supple- 
 menting his information by advising me to have nothing to do with that 
 girl, stating that a friend of his had caught an infectious disease from 
 her, very thoughtfully giving the friend's name, with whom, however, 
 I do not happen to be acquainted. At the entrance gate to the west 
 block three little girls come running along peering cautiously over the 
 fence and looking up and down the street. " There they are," one of 
 them exclaimed excitedly, at the same time letting out ?n ear-splitting 
 trill, and pointing to the other side of the street, where three boys are 
 just crossing to meet them. I am not the only witness of this by-play, 
 for four or five young fellows are seated on the stone- fence commanding 
 a view of O'Connor street, and pass some pleasantries to the girls, which, 
 if directed to decent girls, would have been insults. Further on are 
 two women and two men talking to a hackman, stationed in front of 
 
130 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 the main entrance. The four of them have apparently come to a settle- 
 ment for they all get into the hack and are driven away. Seated upon 
 the stone wall at the east end of the grounds are some four or five young 
 fellows, not one of whom is more than twen '. Two girls pass them 
 and as they enter the gate leading to the lovers' walk, they make some 
 remark, upon which two boys slide down from their perches and follow 
 them, and in a few minutes two more follow them. Enter the grounds 
 and it is simply a repetition. Standing in the shadow of the trees, 
 just adjacent to the east block I encounter a couple of lads one of whom 
 I know, and raising his finger warningly he commands my silence. 
 
 •♦Sh We'rewatching and They're with 
 
 and , over on that bench," pointing to a bench a short distance 
 
 away. , 
 
 Both of these lads who are being watched are sons of Civil Ser- 
 vants whom I know. One girl is a merchant's daughter, the other my 
 friend did not know more than her name. Those two lads watched the 
 boys and girls for over an hour, with the patience of Indians, and even- 
 tually saw what they expected to see — a breach of the seventh com- 
 mandment. They told me so afterwards. 
 
 I have introduced this Ottawa matter for one or two reasons. 
 Ottawa has been prominently brought before the public on account of 
 the alleged scenes in the House of Commons, and because of having 
 secured that priceless boop— the curfew bell. I desire to demonstrate 
 to you that the immorality that exists in Toronto exists in the same 
 ratio in every other city in Canada and the United States, and that my 
 assertion that the vice that is draped in the ^arb of virtue or has the 
 varnish of an outward refinement laid over its leprosy is far more des- 
 tructive and infectious than the shameless wickedness which hides its 
 loathsome front is perfectly true, besides proving that women who pre- 
 tend to be public moralists are more exercised over what "looks" bad 
 than they are over what is really sinful. I do not hesitate to say that 
 every incident I have given you in the foregoing culminated in a breach 
 of the seventh commandment, as boys and girls and men and women 
 who meet each other there do so for no good purpose. The environ- 
 ments of Parliament hill — the lovers' walk, the canal bank, and the 
 river bank— afford too numerous places of concealment for there to be 
 any question as to what those people were doing around there. And 
 not only Parliament Hill, but Rockliffe Park, the west end park, the 
 suburbs of the city, in fact any place within a twenty minutes' walk 
 from the heart of the city is a safe place of assignation, as every boy or 
 man in Ottawa knows. What, therefore, have these people accomplished 
 in the direction of good morals ? I have no doubt that if the mother of 
 any one of these boys heard that her son had been drunk it would send 
 her into hysterics, if she saw him drunk it would probably produce con- 
 vulsions, but if anyone were to suggest that she should impress upon 
 the mind of her son that it was better and nobler for him to restrain his 
 passions than indulge them, that God will demand an explanation for 
 every breach of His laws, she would probably compassionate the igno- 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 131 
 
 ranee of such person, and with a pitying smile inform him or her that 
 her son did not even know what adultery meant ! What I have stated 
 to you as having taken place on Parliament Hill all occurred within two 
 hours. I made the trip just to give you an idea of what is going on, 
 and the foregoing is the result of my researches. Compare this with 
 the work so-called public moralists are doing, and as also demonstrating 
 that there is no place on the continent of America where there are not 
 prostitutes, and where apparently respectable girls are taking their 
 places. I would like some of these moralists to accompany me some 
 night to Rockliffe Park and some other of the places I have mentioned 
 and see for themselves what is going on. Perhaps, then they might 
 conclude that there are greater evils than intemperance, and that the 
 curfew bell is not going to make any very great difference in public 
 morals. 
 
 It may, perhaps, be remarked that I have never done anything to 
 promote public morals, .ind in reply thereto I simply say I advocate 
 what I do from the independent standpoint of the logician, and ask 
 the public to judge as to whether it would not be better to tolerate 
 houses than have even a portion of what goes on at present amongst 
 so-called respectable girls. 
 
 STREETWALKERS. 
 
 Under this heading come the enormous number of young women 
 and girls of all conditions of life, some of whom are respectable to all 
 intents and purposes, and others who make no such pretensions. It will 
 be remembered that the staff-inspector made use of the following lan- 
 cfuage in his evidence before the Prison Reform Commission : 
 
 The number of prostitutes is greatly reduced We find that there is not half the number 
 arrested for prostitution that there was before- Their houses have been broken up and solici- 
 ting is not carried on at all except in the worst part of the city. I don'f think there are half as 
 many as there were in 1865, when the population was not more than a quarter of what it is now. 
 As a general thing citizens say that they find it a very rare thing to be solicited in the streets by 
 women. In fact unless you go to certain portions of St. John's Ward, women will not solicit 
 men on the streets at all, and a few years ago it was quite a common thing to be solicited on 
 the most fashionable streets in the city. 
 
 Just as the idea strikes you you can accept or reject the above 
 piece of information. To young men it will be somewhat of a revela- 
 tion, inasmuch as its information will be so original to the youth or 
 young man who has had the slightest amount of experience on the 
 subj ect. 
 
 First of all women and girls are more cautious, and although it is 
 stated that citizens say that they find it a very rare thing to be solicited 
 on the streets by women, it is likewise to be remembered that the class 
 of people who would volunteer any such information to the Inspector, 
 are not the class of people who are honoured by the attentions of prost- 
 itutes. In the face of this evidence, I make the assertion that on every 
 street in tlie city that I have ever been on, I have been solicited, and 
 these streets include Carlton, Jarvis, Sberbourne, St, George, College 
 and Bloor, while on King, Queen and Church it is so notorious that I 
 
182 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 need not mention them ; nor Yonge and York, I mention this cir- 
 cumstance to show that while women have solicited me on these streets, 
 how much more could be told by younger men and b-.ys— particularly 
 boys — considerable of which latter I have seen myself. Is it to be 
 presumed tor one moment that these people are likely to give their 
 experience to the police ? I also understand that one of the reasons 
 given for this alleged decrease in prostitutes or more properly speaking 
 streets walkers, is owing to the fact that policemen in plain clothes are 
 or have been detailed to patrol the streets, and every woman caught 
 soliciting is promptly arrested. This proposition is so perfectly pre- 
 posterous that I confess my surprise that anyone of intelligence would 
 advance such argument in support of such a theory, unless, as I think 
 myself, the theory is so far without foundation that it inquires bolster- 
 ing up with some such nonsense. First of all if any street walkers are 
 arrested by policemen in plain clothes, it demonstrates that they must 
 be pretty thick, when they are obliged to solicit, or either so far forget 
 themselves as to solicit, policemen, who could be recognized by anyone 
 of the least intelligence, no matter what their disguise might be, plain 
 clothed or any other way. It is also stated that after a few arrests by 
 policemen in plain clothes there is a cessation, and the inference is that 
 they are frightened out of the city, but the cold fact remains that the 
 girls, seeing that arrests have been made, refrain from soliciting the 
 plain clothed policemen, who are easily recognized, for they, like Cain, 
 have an unmistakable brand. Now, as these girls are without a doubt 
 amongst the most intelligent and shrewdest people in the world, it is 
 easy to understand why there is a cessation of arrests, when one or two 
 have been effected. 
 
 I submit for your consideration a few cases just to show that in 
 spite of the twaddle these people talk there are cases that come before 
 the Magistrate : 
 
 Maiy Dean, arrested on the instance of her mother, who alleges that she cannot keep the 
 girl off the streets, was charged with vagrancy, and remanded until to-morrow. 
 
 Mabel Stuart, the girl who was arrested charged with robbing Geo. Verrall, a stranger, 
 of $20, was remanded. It is said Verrall met this damsel on Richmond street, and was escorted 
 to No. 9. He wanted to leave, and the girl pointed a pistol at him, demanding a dollar. Varrell 
 went into the house again, and he says, that while the difficulty was being adjusted, he was 
 "touched " for all his money. 
 
 There are three charges for illegal liquor selling against William F. Stewart, who keeps 
 a hotel on Front street. A month ago Magistrate Kingsford suspended this man's license for 60 
 days on conviction of keeping a disorderly house. An appeal was taken to Osgoode Hall and 
 in the meantime it is said Siewart's lawyers advised him to go on selling. The appeal has not 
 yet been decided, and License Inspector Dexter claims Stewart had no right to open his bar 
 until the 60 days were up. The case will come up again on the 29th. 
 
 This is the case where a hotel keeper allowed people to take rooms 
 at his hotel for a short time when they wished of an evening. 
 
 Soliciting on the present day is like every other branch of industry 
 in that it is reduced to a science. The fact that citizens state that they 
 are not solicited to the extent they were some years ago may be per- 
 fectly correct, and it may be, too, that this is the result of having police- 
 men in plain clothes patrol the streets. But I assert positively that 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 138 
 
 there is absolutely no diminution in the practice of soliciting — the 
 assertions of anyone to the contrary notwithstanding. There is a differ- 
 ence in the system, that is all. You meet a girl on the street and a 
 flash from her eyes will tell you what she is. You look back after 
 passing her, and she does the same. If you desire to follow her, do so 
 and the probabilities are ninety-nine to one that you have a street 
 walker. No actual soliciting has been done, it is true, but what is the 
 difference ? Of course in the case of respectable girls such a course is 
 called flirting, in prostitutes it is called soliciting. I speak from personal 
 observation, and consequently with a greater degree of authority than 
 those illustrious citizens who assert that there is no soliciting done. If 
 policemen in plain clothes are ever solicited, it does not, in my judgment, 
 prove how little soliciting is done, but how much, for the streets must 
 be glutted with prostitutes when they are obliged to solicit instead of 
 pursuing the tactics I have stated obtain at present. 
 
 Supposing for argument that there is any cessation of actual street 
 walking and soliciting, there is still another fact that is to be taken 
 into consideration. It is to be remembered that for the past few years 
 during the summer months band concerts have been held in different 
 parks, and that there is an enormous number of prostitutes frequenting 
 these places is beyond question. How much easier, therefore, it is for 
 them to attend a place of this kind, where there is practically no risk, 
 and secure custom, than to walk the streets. Or take the religious street 
 shows, the salvation army parade, and in fact any event that draws a 
 crowd, will furnish a place where prostitutes can be met, and regret- 
 table as It may be young girls and boys find these places their most con- 
 venient rendez-vous. These are only circum'^tances taken from a dozen 
 which might be enumerated. Again by the evolution and perfection 
 of the practice it is really unnecessary for a woman to speak to a man 
 on the streets ; if a man is at all experienced, he will pass a woman or 
 girl, and one glance shot out from the eyes will tell him her character, 
 and if he wishes to make her acquaintance he turns and follows her. 
 Schools girls or others of tender years have with a wonderful precocity 
 taken up the example set by the prostitute and any boy who wished to 
 make the acquaintance of a girl knows perfectly well that it is unne- 
 cessary for him to receive an introduction. He merely speaks to her, 
 and that is sufficient, in ninety cases out of a hundred. It is not a 
 particularly pleasing incident to narrate, or a very healthy state of 
 affairs but that is a matter with which I have nothing to do, I give you 
 the information, and you can trace the cause where ever you wish. I 
 am simply giving you my experience and observation and it may be 
 depended upon for reliability. 
 
 In the city of Denver in the wild and woolly west, houses of ill- 
 fame are permitted to exist as a social necessity, and as an absolute 
 safeguard to girls and young women. Some years previously it was 
 almost impossible for a respectable woman to appear on the streets after 
 dark without being insulted, until it became necessary to string a few 
 men up, and as a compromise measure to permit houses of ill-fame to 
 
184 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 exist. If a rtan desire to visit a place of this character now he is at 
 liberty to do so, and runs no danger of being arrested and disgraced by 
 the publicity, and at the same time the female portion of the city can 
 walk out at night on any of the streets without danger. Let any girl 
 of eighteen or as young as twelve appear on Yonge street after dark 
 and her reputation is assumed to be light, and she will, in the course 
 of her promenade, be spoken to and at, and followed probably by scores 
 of young men and boys who do not believe that young ladies of res- 
 pectability appear on the streets after dark in the beautiful and saintly 
 city of Toronto, noted for its morality and absence of houses of ill-fame. 
 
 One evening immediately after one of the band concerts in Clar- 
 ence Square a friend of mine and I walked along Front street west. We 
 did not meet a single pair of the opposite sexes, but fully half a dozen. 
 Boys of i6 or 17 years of age, wearing short pants, and girls certainly 
 not older and in short dresses. What were they doing there ? Well, 
 when you see boys with their arms around girls' waists as the majo- 
 rity of these were, and in other positions equally suggestive, I do not 
 think it can consistently be contended that their friendship was purely 
 Platonic. 
 
 I happen to know who some of these boys were. One of them was 
 the descendant of a well-known United Empire Loyalist, whose family 
 is known all over Canada, another was the son of a lawyer, who though 
 not a prominent man is still well known in Toronto, and the youth 
 himself has been mentioned in the newspapers as a prize winner in one 
 of the city schools, while a third is the son of a prominent King street 
 merchant. The girls I have not the honour of knowing, but presumed 
 them to be misses in the middle walks ot life. I do not say that they 
 had committed any act of wrong, but it is a reasonable presumption that 
 boys of assured social position do not usually go with girls so much 
 their inferior socially for any good purpose, and it might also be men- 
 tioned that Front street west is not a thoroughfare frequented by res- 
 pectable people at nights, to any very great extent. Besides there is 
 the inference that the Grand Trunk Yards and the grounds adjacent 
 to the fort afford a retreat availed of by people of loose morality. I 
 never asked these lads what they were doing there, but I repeat that 
 circumstances were strongly against any presumption of innocent pro- 
 menading, when the hour of the night, the isolation of the place and 
 the somewhat immodest positions they were in, r.re taken into consi- 
 deration. 
 
 At nights any time after eight o'clock in the summer, and from 
 seven in the winter these girls pass up and down Yonge street and 
 ^^^PS Queen west until nearly ten o'clock, when the streets begin to 
 get deserted, and to remain upon them would be to make themselves 
 conspicuous. These are the best dressed who promenade these streets 
 just mentioned, while those of inferior appearance may be met with on 
 Richmond street west. King west, Simcoe and Front west, where the 
 police protection is not so likely to interfere with their vocation. The 
 largest number are young women from the ages of eighteen to twenty- 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 18^ 
 
 four, but it is becoming alarmingly frequent to meet young girls of 
 fourteen and fifteen, though there is this difference between them, one 
 is seeking custom for money, the others are generally seeking the gra- 
 tification of pure licentiousness, and very rarely receive money as the 
 price of their sin. Some of the girls are pretty and attractive, but the 
 majority, and especially those of the class who frequent Richmond, 
 King and Simcoe streets, are the very reverse. 
 
 A great number of the girls have some regular employment at 
 which <^bey work during the day. Their regular earnings are not large, 
 and this means is pursued to increase them. Some, but they are few, 
 sleep all day, and ply their trade at night, and there are very few young 
 men or boys who do not have a place to take a girl to, such as boat 
 houses and the rooms occupied by young men for this purpose. Again 
 the ferries are a source of supply to men in search of female compa- 
 nions. He will find them both going to the island and coming from it, 
 and on the island as well, a considerable number of characters being 
 over there day and night, especially is this the case on Sundays. 
 
 I could, were I disposed to do so, give some information that would 
 open the eyes of the staff- inspector as to where some of the girls who 
 are supposed to have left the city, have domiciled themselves. 
 
 A friend of mine met a rather pretty girl on a certain street in the 
 city where the usual sign of recognition passed between them, and he 
 turned back and followed her. On being asked where she would 
 take him the girl suggested that they take a coupe, which they did. 
 Two or three days later, he was invited by a friend to dine. A pretiy 
 waitress came along and asked him for his order. He looked up in 
 surprise, but his self-possession was equal to the occasion — it was his 
 companion of a few evenings before. 
 
 This branch of the evil suggests at once that it comprises the best 
 and worst of the girls and women who engage in it. Girls who are too 
 respectable to be in a house of ill-fame, and some of whom are living 
 with their parents, do not hesitate to do this while the women who do 
 it are usually those on the last road to perdition, or who are fallen so 
 low that no one will have anything to do with them were they in a 
 house of ill fame. 
 
 Perhaps it will not be out of place for me to give an illu^'tration of 
 an occurrence that was investigated in the County court and which will 
 demonstrate beyond question the assertions I have made in regard to 
 soliciting, or if it is not actual soliciting, it may easily be classed as 
 such. It will at least show clearly how easily street acquaintances are 
 made, and I do not think any one will deny that girls are in most inst- 
 ances to blame. 
 
 About a year and a half ago William A. Morrison, a young lith- 
 ographer, who will shortly attain his majority, passed a young lady on 
 Church street, named Alice Fenwick. She was a stranger to him, but 
 he addressed her in a friendly manner. She returned his salutation, 
 and they went for a walk that night. And they met again, and passed 
 some hours in each other's company. In the Civil Assizes before Chief 
 
136 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Justice Armour and a jury there was commenced the trial of an action 
 for seduction and assault in which the mother of Miss Fenwick figures 
 as the couplainant, and young Morrison occupied the position of defen- 
 dant. At the time of the first meeting on Church street Alice Fenwick 
 was employed in the Granite Club in the capacity of housemaid, recei- 
 ving nine dollars per month for her services. In consequence of Mor- 
 rison's treatment her health has suffered, and Mrs. Fenwick seeks 
 redress, claiming $2,000 for the seduction and a like amount for the 
 assault to compensate her for the loss she sustained by reason of her 
 daughter's inability to continue her regular employment. The first 
 witness examined for the plaintiff was Mrs. Fenwick, who testified 
 regarding the points of issue as far as she herself was concerned. Then 
 Miss Fenwick was called. She is a slim young woman, 19 years of age, 
 and gave her evidence clearly and intelligently. She described her 
 first meeting with the defendant on Church street, and they walked 
 together as far as Roxborough avenue. As they went along Yonge 
 street, Morrison made indecent proposals to her, which she rejected. 
 They turned along Roxborough avenue, and he attempted to force her 
 into a cottage that seemed to her to be empty. She left him and started 
 to run away, but he followed her. In the struggle she tripped on the 
 root of a tree and fell to the ground. The defendant assaulted her. 
 About a month later she met him again on Wellesley street, when he 
 again made improper advances to her. She resisted and he tore some 
 of her underclothing off by his violent conduct. In cross-examination 
 Miss Fenwick stated that the defendant's assault upon her had not ren- 
 dered her enciente. Mr. Lount ther* asked for a non-suit on the grounds 
 that the girl's mother had not suffered any pecuniary loss on account 
 of the assault. This view of the case was concurred in and sustained 
 by his Lordship, who dismissed the action without costs. 
 
 This decision will, doubtless, be viewed as perfectly reasonable and 
 just. If girls make hap-hazard acquaintances on the street they may be 
 assured that their friendship is not sought after on account of their 
 sublime attractiveness. It also proves that professional street walkers 
 are not really a necessity, but that my theory that ostensibly respect- 
 able girls are taking their places, is based upon a solid foundation. 
 
 Nor is the practice of soliciting confined exclusively to women 
 about town. I have known children, actually children, solicit men and 
 boys on the streets. One little ailss, who was certainly not more than 
 twelve years of age met me on Jarvis street near Carleton one night, 
 and stopped me. 
 
 " But," I objected, " where can we go?" 
 
 " There is a lane that runs through to Mutual street, where we can 
 go, and no one will see us." 
 
 " And how much do you want ? " I asked. 
 
 " Anything you like. Twenty-five cents." 
 
 Twenty-five cents. Great God : and the staff-inspector states that 
 there is no soliciting done except on the lower streets. 
 
 I know that little girls do solicit on the streets, not only from actual 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 137 
 
 experience, but from young men and boys who have stated to me that 
 such is the case, and given particulars of such a minute description that 
 to doubt them would be absurd. They will go into lanes in almost any 
 part of the city, in just the same manner as the girl I have mentioned 
 offered to do. Whether the motive be money or sensuality is foreign 
 to'the question. I have given you the facts, the motive you can supply. 
 
 LODGING HOUSES. 
 
 Toronto is, happily, free almost from the cheap lodging houses but 
 they do exist to a limited extent, and seemingly they pay well. One 
 of these disreputable holes was broken up and none too soon, when the 
 famous Speelman was incarcerated in the Penitentiary. They are plan- 
 ned to afford the greatest accommodation in point of numbers with the 
 least in point of comfort. The places are infested with vermin, and 
 the rooms are small, dark and dirty. In some of these houses no sheet 
 or coverlet is afiforded, but even with the best of these accommodations 
 the lodger suffers from cold in the winter and bed bugs in the summer. 
 The business of the lodging house commences before ten o'clock and its 
 greatest rush is just after the closing af the theatres ; and among those 
 who ar^ obliged to take refuge in these holes are doubtless those who 
 have seen better days, besides runaway boys, drunken mechanics and 
 broken down manki. :d generally. Each one sleeps with his clothes on 
 and his hat under his head to keep it from being stolen. In addition 
 to these lodging houses and not to be confounded with them are the 
 numberless places where are apartments to let. There are hundreds of 
 young men in the city who will rent a room from a private family and 
 take their meals at boarding houses, hotels or restaurants. If you are 
 seeking a room insert an advertisement in the Telegram and in two 
 d ays you will have fully two hundred answers from all parts of the 
 city. It matters not that you specify some particular locality, you will 
 receive answers from a part of the city directly opposite to that to 
 which you are desirous of going. You get some of the daintily-penned 
 and delicately enveloped billets of Jarvis, Carleton, Sherbourne and 
 other fashionable streets to the ill-spelled, pencil scrawled uncovered 
 note of Adelaide, Richmond, Nelson, Bond and other streets of similar 
 character. After laying aside as ineligible about one hundred and fifty 
 letters, yqu retain about twenty-five or thirt>, and devote a morning to 
 inspection and selection. You become acquainted with strange localities 
 and bell-handles, and intormatory scraps of paper wafered beside 
 doorways and in windows. You will endure tedious waiting at thres- 
 holds, and find that a single application for admission very rarely pro- 
 cures it, and according as your quest be high or low, so well your ex- 
 perience vary. If the former, you may expect to be ushered into spa- 
 cious and luxuriously furnished parlors, where seated in comfortably 
 padded chairs you may contemplate marble tables on which gorgeously 
 bound volumes are artistically arranged, and mirrors capable of abash- 
 ing a modest man to utter speechlessness, awaiting the advent of stately 
 dames whose dresses rustle as with conscious opulence. You will enter 
 
138 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 grand staircases and gorgeous apartments and listen with bland satis- 
 faction to the enumeration of the modern improvements which are 
 contained in these houses, and if money be not an object you will not 
 fare badly nor seek far, nor even be startled at the figure at which they 
 may be enjoyed. But if your aspirations are circumscribed by a shallow 
 purse your researches will produce very different results. You will see 
 servant girls with unkempt hair and uncleanly physionomy, and you 
 will be ushered intosittingrooms where the blinds are drawn and where 
 you can not have a too searching view of the upholster>'. You will 
 have interviews with landladies of various appearances, ages and cha- 
 racteristics, landladies dubious and dirty, landladies severe and sus- 
 picious, landladies calm and confiding, chatty and conciliatory. You will 
 survey innumerable rooms generally under that peculiirly cheerful 
 aspect attendant upon unmade beds and unemptied wash basins ; and 
 if of sani*-ary principles examine the windows in order to ascertain 
 whether they be asphyxiative or movable, you will find how apartments 
 may be indifferently ventilated by half windows, and attics constructed 
 so that standing erect within them is only practicable in one spot. How 
 a threadbare carpet, a twelve by six mirror and a disjointed chair may, 
 in the lively imagination of a landlady, be considered furniture. How 
 double, triple and even quadruple beds in single rooms and closets into 
 which you only succeed in effecting an entrance by dint of violent 
 compression between the bed and the wall are esteemed highly eligible 
 accommodations for single gentlemen. How partitions of purely nominal 
 character may in no wise prevent the occupants of adjoining beds from 
 holding converse with one another, or becoming cognizant of neighbour- 
 ing snores or turnings in beds. You will observe that lavatory arrange- 
 ments are mostly of an imperfect description, generally comprising a frail 
 and rickety wash stand which has apparently existed for ages in a 
 Niagara of soapsuds, a ewer and basin of limited capacity, and a cottony, 
 web-like towel about as well calculated for its purpose as a similar sized 
 piece of blotting paper would be. In rooms which have not recently 
 been subject to the purifying brush of the white washer you will notice 
 the mortal remains of misquitos and other such like characters, orna- 
 menting the ceilings and walls where they have encountered destiny in 
 the shape of slippers or boot soles of former occupants. 
 
 It has frequently been a source of surprise to me that some capit- 
 alist did not or does not, build a place containing twenty or twenty- 
 five rooms and furnish them in plain substantial style and there can 
 be no doubt that it would pay a handsome interest on the investment, 
 and it would make a home for scores of young men who are never satis- 
 fied with their present occupancy. If built in a central locality its success 
 is beyond question. But at the present time, there are hundreds of 
 places where rooms are to let, and there is always some drawback to 
 their success. Sometimes there is no bath, and again there may be a 
 bath and no hot water. People who rent rooms are too frequently afraid 
 they are going to be swindled, and make themselves objectionable. I 
 know an old couple who had rooms, comparatively nice ones, too, but 
 
OF TORONTO THR GOOD. 139 
 
 the man made himself objectionable by presenting himself regularly 
 on Saturday night as soon as he heard the lodgers' foot on the stair- 
 way, with the result that no man with any spirit would stay there. 
 
 A case was told me sometime ago of how one woman got even with 
 a backward lodger. It appears that in the hey-dey of his prosperity 
 he had been in the habit of going with a young lady and making her 
 frequent presents, fans, an opera glass and some other such trifles unti 1 
 be got out of employment, and could not pay his rent, and seemed in 
 no position financially to do so either. At last the old woman hit upon 
 a scheme. She repaired to the young lady's residence, and told her 
 the story of her lover's infamy. She was listened to with profound 
 respect, and the young lady immediately after her departure, proceeded 
 to a pawnbroker's where she disposed of all these trinkets, and paid 
 over the proceeds to the irate old landlady, satisfying her account in 
 full, but she gave the young man his conge, and he shortly afterwards 
 left the city, where he is now doing well. 
 
 Some of the incidents connected with lodging houses have their 
 comical side as well as their more serious aspect, and peculiar stories 
 might be told if the walls could only speak. 
 
 One woman with whom I was acquainted and whose experience 
 has been somewhat varied tells of a case that happened in her house 
 that demonstrates how the subtle working of the passions leads many 
 a girl astray. 
 
 A young lady a dressmaker came to her and asked for a room 
 and though she did not make a practice of letting rooms to females 
 she finally consented. 
 
 After being in the house some weeks, the young lady became 
 somewhat irregular in her hours and finally after having been remon- 
 strated with, decided to give up her room. She had arranged to do so 
 in the course often days, and was making her arrangements accordingly 
 when a lady friend came to spend two or three nights with her. On 
 the second n'ght the friend was taken ill, and the next day a physician 
 had to be called, but the first occupant of the room left it as she had 
 first intended, leaving her sick friend in the tenancy. The latter then 
 told the landlady that she was married, and that her husband came 
 home every Saturday night, and she expected he would pay all the 
 expenses of the room on his arrival. This turned out as she had pre- 
 dicted ; the young man paid the account, and remained in the house 
 until Monday morning, he and his wife occupying the room together, 
 when he departed. This state of affairs continued for about two months 
 and the pair were getting into debt, unt'l they owed something like 
 sixteen dollars, when the landlady began to suspect something was 
 amiss. She came to the conclusion that the pair were not married at 
 all, and that when the gientleman presented himself next, he would 
 deny him admittance. On the following Saturday night he was going 
 up stairs, when the landlady met him. 
 
 " You can't go up there," she said decidedly. 
 
 "Why not?" 
 
140 OP TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 " Because that woman is not your wife, and I'm going to put her 
 out next week." 
 
 The young man laughed uneasily, and then said : 
 
 "Well, I suppose if you say you won't, you won't. But I want to 
 pay you a portion of the money I promised to you." 
 
 " You promised me," she answered " that you would pay it all 
 to-night." 
 
 " Yes, so I did, but it is impossible." 
 
 This was on Saturday night and on the following Monday, in spite 
 of many lamentations on the part of the young woman she was com- 
 pelled to leave although she was still unwell. It was now a question 
 as to how the arears of rent were to be paid, as the landlady, Mrs. B... 
 was unacquainted with the firm where the young man was supposed to 
 work. She consulted a directory and found t;iat he was in the employ 
 of a wholesale firm, on whom she immediately called. 
 
 "No," the manager informed her, "he was not with them now, but 
 was in the employ of Smith & Jones, who were in the same business." 
 
 She called on Smith & Jones and saw her quondam lodger, who 
 promised to pay her so much a week until the account was paid. He 
 carried out the contract for five or six weeks and finally disappeared 
 and a call on the firm revealed the fact that he was (iuton a six weeks' 
 trip. Mrs. B... then decided to call on his mother, and see what could 
 be done there. After stating her business, the young man's mother 
 replied that the young woman was not her son's wife. " Though," she 
 added, " 1 would not be surprised if he married her." After a moment 
 of reflection she added : 
 
 " It is now nearly two years since my daughter brought her child 
 here, and with that girl as a nurse. When my son came home from 
 college, she followed him about the house like a dog, until I finally 
 caught her coming from his room one night, and then I gave her notice 
 to leave here. She went away and he followed her, apparently com- 
 pletel> infatuated, and from being a most excellent young man or 
 rather boy, he became neglectful of his home and everything else. His 
 father has made it a rule to bave the house closed at ten o'clock p^t 
 night, and when that hour arrived he was compelled to sleep out. From 
 bail to worse he appeared to go until finally he was forbidden the house, 
 and at my personal request the firm by which he is employed consented 
 to give him a trial. He has, I believe, given them satisfaction, and so 
 far is doing well but his salary is not enough to keep him and this 
 girl. 1 will pay you the balance of your account, and you can give me 
 a receipt in full." 
 
 The story ends rather abruptly, but the mother who paid her son's 
 indebtedness died some time ago, I saw by one of the city papers, but 
 whether the son ever married the young woman or not I cannot say. 
 
 Very frequently apartments are advertised to let, apply to box ... 
 Telegram, yet if the persons inserting them would reflect for a moment 
 they would see how fallacious it is to expect that people who want 
 rooms would go to the trouble of replying to such an advertisement, 
 
OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. Ul 
 
 when there are scores of rooms advertised from desirable localities, 
 where the addresses are given. 
 
 Persons seeking rooms frequently complain of being annoyed for a 
 reference. This is net very pleasant, but it is absolutely necessary, as 
 it is not known whether the applicant is a gentleman or a thief, or the 
 woman a saint or a fallen woman, and a landlady naturally desires to 
 k'jep her house free from improper characters, and to secure as guests 
 those who will pay her promptly and regularly. In spite of all efforts 
 it may be afifirmed that there are few boarding houses that have not 
 some time or other contained improper characters. Travellers frequently 
 bring women to houses where they keep them during a short sojourn in 
 the city, and no one ever knows anything more about it. 
 
 A lady on Mutual street who taken borders occasionally had an 
 experience of this nature, and considerable difficulty in getting rid of 
 her fair guest. A gentleman claiming to be her husband engaged a 
 room and board for some days, and they lived quite pleasantly though 
 the landlady noticed that the gentleman rarely, if ever, looked her 
 squarely in the face, and she became somewhat suspicious, but when the 
 week was up, he paid their expenses and announced that his wife would 
 remain. The first day after his departure the wife fell into the rather 
 bad habit of sleeping late, and having her meals served in her rooms, 
 but to this such strenuous objection was taken that a conflict ensued, 
 and the woman was told to leave. She deferred doing so, however, 
 until another day, and her husband returned. He paid their bill, and 
 promised to move the next day but that morning was the last they saw 
 of him, though his wife serenely remained as though she were the most 
 welcome guest imaginable. At last the inmate landlady became ex- 
 asperated, and waiting on the stairs one morning, she told the lady 
 she must go. 
 
 "Indeed," the latter replied, "when I get ready." 
 
 " No," she rejoined furiously, " to-day." 
 
 After breaking into a silvery little laugh, the guest continued : 
 
 "Do you know I had just been saying to my husband before he 
 left that I was sure you were drunk the last night he was here, but he 
 laughed at me. I'm sure if he saw you now he would come to the same 
 conclusion as I have." 
 
 The landlady was quivering with passion but she said angrily " I'll 
 see you get out to-day." , 
 
 But the lady didn't. 
 
 The next morning the man himself took a hand in and rapping 
 at the lady's door, he called out : 
 
 " If you don't get out of here by the time I come home at noon 
 I'll throw your trunks out and you after them." 
 
 That had the desired effect. That morning she went out and in a 
 short time a cabman called for the trunks, where no doubt a similar 
 game would be played upon some one else. 
 
142 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 POOR OF THE CITY. PAWNBROKERS. GAMBLING 
 HOUSES. DRUNKENNESS. IMPOSTERS. PICK- 
 POCKETS. CROOKS. THIEVES. 
 ASSIGNATION HOUSES. 
 
 THE POOR OF THE CITY. 
 
 As has been before stated land for building purposes is high and 
 scarce in Toronto, and in consequence, dwellings rent for more than 
 in other Canadian cities. The poorer classes are to be met with in all 
 parts of the city, but Bathurst street, Lombard, and in the heart of the 
 city, in St. John's Ward, are places where they are the most numerous. 
 The majority of them are, beyond a doubt, honest and willing to work, 
 and in times of great commercial activity nearly all can find some 
 means of employment, but in dull seasons, when merchants and manu- 
 facturers are forced to discharge their employees, hundreds are then 
 thrown out of employment and the greatest suffering and distress pre- 
 vail. Besides there are numerous vagrants, drunkards and disreputable 
 persons who would rather steal or beg than work, and whose misery 
 must be very great. It is not to be presumed that all who desire em- 
 ployment can procure it in Toronto ; the contrary being really the case 
 because labour and skill of almost any kind are here in excess. For 
 every position of regular labour there are at least five applicants, and a 
 man must be highly recommended to obtain a position. Many and 
 many a young man respectable in appearance, hone.''* and upright, can 
 tell his experience with want, and how almost impossible to obtain 
 work it is, and who is depending upon some more fortunate companions 
 for his room and board, just as they invite him, while boarding house 
 keepers can tell by the score instances of this kind. 
 
 PAWNBROKERS. 
 
 The sign of the three gilt balls is very common on York street and 
 Queen street west, and where the ancient badge of the pawnbroker is 
 not seen the words, " Exchange office" answer the same purpose. The 
 law recognizes the fact that these people are a necessity in all large 
 communities, and while tolerating them as such it endeavours to inter- 
 pose a safeguard on behalf of the community by requiring that none 
 but persons of good character and integrity shall exercise the calling. 
 In a great many instances, however, they are with but few exceptions 
 a most rascally set. They are little i^iore than receivers of stolen goods, 
 and the police often trace stolen property to them, notwithstanding the 
 fact th?.t they are compelled to produce a statement every day show- 
 ing their transactions. Interest at the rate of ten per cent a month is 
 allowed the first month, at least that is what they charge, and after 
 that it is reduced to five, and it is surprising how many persons are 
 compelled by force of circumstances to obtain accommodation from the 
 pawnbrokers. Goods taken to them are received generally, without 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 143 
 
 question, and they advance a fraction of the value of the article which 
 is to be redeemed in one month, that being the time limited upon all 
 pawn tickets, but the price at which the articles are taken is sufficiently 
 low to render it certain that the sale of it will more than cover the 
 advance. 
 
 The principal customers of these people are the poor. Persons of 
 former respectability or wealth, widows, and orphans are always sure 
 to carry into their poverty some of the trinkets that were theirs in the 
 heyday of prosperity. Jewelry, clothing ornaments of all kinds and even 
 the wedding ring of the wife and mother come to him one by one, never 
 to be regained by the owners. They are taicen at a mere pittance 
 and sold at a profit of several hundred per cent. You may see the poor 
 pass into the doors of these shops every day, and the saddest faces to 
 be seen are those of the women coming away from them. Want leaves 
 its victims no choice, but drives them mercilessly into the hands of the 
 money lenders. 
 
 GAMBLING HOUSES. 
 
 Games of chance of all kinds are forbidden by laws which describe 
 various severe penalties for the offence, but in spite of this prohibition, 
 there is no country where gambling is more common than in Canada, 
 and no city where it is carried on the a greater extent than in Toronto. 
 But where do these places exist ? That is telling. There are some pro- 
 fessional gamblers in the city and the favourite game is poker. Gam- 
 bling for money is not, ostensibly, carried on. The stakes consist of 
 checks or counters provided by the people interested, and the losses 
 are settled by means of these checks or counters representing an under- 
 stood value. In this manner the letter, if not the spirit of the law, is 
 carried out. Scores of young men in the city spend the entire Sunday 
 afternoon in playing poker. They meet in the room of some friend and 
 play for a certain limit. In another way some young man will have a 
 room where he has a complete gambling outfit, and if several friends 
 desire to have a game they can do so by permitting him to have what 
 is professionally called the " rake-off," and this sometimes amounts to 
 quite an item. I was acquainted with about twenty men in the city 
 who rent a room in which there is a complete outfit. When several of 
 them wish to use the room, they get the key from the gentleman who 
 keeps it, and no one even suspects that there is such a game going on. 
 
 DRUNKENNESS. 
 
 Drunkenness is very common in Toronto. Thousands of arrests are 
 made annually for drunkenness alone, and disorderly conduct. In ad- 
 dition there are thousands of cases of which the police never hear. The 
 vice is not confined to any one class, it is to be seen in all conditions of life, 
 and in both sexes. Day after day you will see men under the influence 
 of liquor, reeling through the streets or lying under the trees in the 
 parks. The police soon rid the streets of such cases, which are compa- 
 
144 OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 ratively few during the day. At night the number of intoxicated per- 
 sons increases, when you will see all classes of drunkards. There goes 
 a young man, handsomely dressed, evidently the son of rich parents, 
 unable to stand by himself, and piloted by a friend whose chief care is 
 to avoid the police. There is a clerk whose habits will soon lose him 
 his situation. The high and the low are represented on the streets. A 
 funny thing in connection with the drunkenness of young men is the 
 desirability and proneness of people to blame some one else for the 
 downfall of their sons. An incident happened a little while ago, de- 
 monstrating this point. A young man who lived a most exemplary 
 life, and was on the way to promotion, had the misfortune ♦^^o meet a 
 young man of wealthy connections in a state of helpless intoxication. 
 He had only a passing acquaintance with the young fool, but like the 
 good Samaritan he undertook to take him home, and finally accom- 
 plished that arduous duty. Imagine his surprise the next day when 
 the principal of his firm of employers called him into his private office, 
 and after reading him a lecture on the evils of intemperance, informed 
 him very curtly that another such occurrence as the one of of the pre- 
 vious evening would result in instant dismissal. The young man pro- 
 tested his innocence of any wrong doing on his part, and narrated what 
 had accurred. Fortunately his integrity was so great that he was be- 
 lieved. It seems that the drunken young cub's father had called upon 
 the principal and informed him that his son had been led astray by this 
 clerk. His own son could, of course, do no harm, but the other fellow 
 who helped him home was deserving the highest censure, and discharge 
 from his position is possible. 
 
 Bar rooms are in full blast, and will not close until eleven. The 
 better class establishments are quiet and orderly, but the noise and 
 confusion increase as we descend the scale of so-called respectability 
 of these places. The sale of liquors of all kinds is very large, and it is 
 always of doubtful quality. A large number of young men, and old 
 ones too for that matter, make a practice of laying in the supply of the 
 liquors they require on Saturday night for Sunday use, and to treat their 
 friends, and it is found to work satisfactorily. 
 
 •/•■.V-;;^ , .,. ■; IMPOSTERS. ,• ' '., Z : 
 
 Toronto is not large enough to sustain to any great extent many 
 imposters, but those who can obtain a foothold practise all sorts of tricks 
 on the unwary, and are off before one can lay hands on them. If they 
 are caught, they are tried and sent to the Central or the penitentiary. 
 But there are men and women to be found in the city seeking aid for 
 some charitable institution. They carry books and pencils in which the 
 donor is requested to inscribe his name and the amount given. Small 
 favours are thankfully received, and they depert thanking you deeply 
 and sincerely for your contribution. If you are unable to give to-day 
 they will come to-morrow — next week — anytime to suit your conve- 
 nience. You cannot insult them for like Uriah Heep, they are very 
 humble. In a great many cases they are soliciting money for them- 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 145 
 
 selves alone. Besides these one armed or one legged beggars whose 
 missing member sound as your own, is strapped to their bodies so as to 
 be safely out of sight, women wishing to bury their husbands or chil- 
 dren, women with borrowed or hired babies, and any other object likely 
 to excite pity, meet you occasionally, and if you give them money it 
 will go for drink, in many cases. 
 
 - . PICKPOCKETS. 
 
 Toronto is comparatively free from this species of criminal although 
 not entirely, and it is now reduced to a science, and is followed by many 
 persons as a profession. It requires long practice and great skill, but 
 these when once acquired make their possessors a dangerous member 
 of the community. Women by their lightness of touch and great facility 
 in manipulating their victims make the most dangerous operators. 
 Crowded places of all kinds afford the best opportunities to pickpoc- 
 kets for the exercise of their skill. A gentleman sitting in a crowd 
 discovers that he has lost his money. A well dressed gentleman sits 
 next to him, whose arms are quietly crossed before him, and his fingers 
 enc3£ca in kid gloves are entwined in his lap, in plain sight of every- 
 one who could swear that he has not moved them since they first saw 
 him. An officer could tell after a glance at the faultless gentleman that 
 the arms so conspicuously crossed in his lap are false, that his real arms 
 all the time being free to operate under the folds of his coat. 
 
 CROOKS. 
 
 Some time ago there existed one of the most barefaced swindles 
 ever practised, but this has now almost gone out of existence. It was 
 called the "patent safe" game, and was carried on as follows : A stranger 
 would be accosted by a well-dressed individual, who would immediately 
 begin a careless, friendly conversation. If the overtures of this individual 
 were not repulsed in the first instance, he would soon be joined by his 
 accomplice, who professes to be a stranger to swindler number one. 
 The accomplice has in his possession a small brass ball or sphere, which 
 he says is the model of a patent safe much used by merchants in China 
 and India. He is trying to introduce it in this country, and would like 
 to show the gentleman his model. The brass ball is, to all appearances, 
 solid, but to the initiated is soon made hollow by pressing on a certain 
 innt/ circle, when the centre of the ball, which is in the shape of a small 
 cone, drops out. The bottom of the cone may be unscrewed, when a 
 little chamber is revealed in which is a long piece of white paper, 
 carefully folded and secreted. The other end of the cone, the top of it, 
 can be unscrewed, and a second chamber is revealed in which is a 
 second piece of paper exactly like the first. Swindler number one takes 
 the ball, examine it, and declares that it must be solid. The accom- 
 plice then presses the spring and the centre drops out. He then unscrews 
 one of the chambers, and reveals the paper to the admiring stranger and 
 swindler number one. The accomplice's attention is here called away 
 
146 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 for a moment, and number one, winking at the stranger abstracts the 
 paper from the chamber, screws the lid on, and replaces the centre in 
 the ball. Handing it back to the accomplice, he wishpers to the stranger 
 that he is about to win some money. He then bets the accomplice a 
 sum which he thinks proportionate to the means of the stranger, that 
 there is no paper in the ball. The bet is promptly taken, but swindler 
 number one finds that he has no money, and asks the stranger to lend 
 him the amount offering to divide the winnings with him. The latter, 
 who has seen the paper abstracted from the ball is sure his new found 
 friend will win, and not being averse to making a little money on the 
 spot, produces the desired amount, and hands it to his friend. The 
 accomplice then opens the second chamber reveals the duplicate piece 
 of paper, and claims the stakes. The stranger loses his money and is 
 taught a useful lesson. 
 
 Another swindling game is thimble rigging. The apparatus is 
 three brass thimbles, and a little ball resembling in size and appearance 
 a green pea. The rigger, in the most nonchalant manner imaginable, 
 places the ball apparently under one of the thimbles, in plain view of 
 the spectators and offers to bet any sum that it isn't there. Our friend 
 who is looking on an interested spectator, is astonished at such a pro- 
 position, and looks upon the individual making the bet as little better 
 than a fool, for didn't he see the ball placed under the thimble, and 
 must it not be there still. His idea on that point is soon confirmed — a 
 bystander takes up the bet, the thimble is raised and there is the ball. 
 Again it is covered, and once more the bet is offered. Eager to prove 
 his sagacity our friend produces a bill and covers the sharper's money. 
 The thimble is raised and the ball is gone. 
 
 THIEVES. 
 
 Thieves are not very numerous in Toronto, as the poor creatures 
 who steal a few dollars' worth in open day from stores and stands are 
 not considered by the professional thief as amongst the " fraternity " 
 which embraces housebreakers, pickpockets and burglars. These persons 
 are carefully trained by old hands and are by practice made as perfect 
 as possible in their arts. To be an accomplished burglar requires a 
 very great degree of intelligence, courage, strength and ingenuity, but 
 the lives they lead, stamp their countenances and general bearing with 
 marks, which an experienced officer will recognize at a glance. The 
 sneak thief, the pickpocket and the burglar have certain habits, attitu- 
 des and haunts ; they act in certain ways when placed in certain posi- 
 tions which reveal their occupations to a practiced eye with almost as 
 much certainty as the form and aspect of a blade of grass reveals its 
 species to the eye of the practiced botanist. A sneak-thief will pass 
 along with that rapid rolling, glance of the eyes which distinguishes the 
 tribe ; now he checks himself suddenly in his career, but only for an 
 instant ; an unprofessional eye directed towards him would not notice 
 it, but that sudden pause would speak volumes to an experienced 
 detective. He would know that the thief eye had caught sight of some 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. U1 
 
 booty easy of access. In an hour after he hears that something is stolen, 
 and he knows who has stolen it, but without proof he is powerless. By 
 a regulation pawn brokers are compelled to give a statement daily of 
 their purchases, and in this way large amounts of stolen property are 
 recovered. A favourite pastime lately hds been to steal the lead pipe 
 from new vacant houses, but it is har-^ily being rapidly put a stop to. 
 The magistrate is dealing severely v ith these thieves and receivers and 
 it is not worth while to indulge in the luxury. 
 
 ASSIGNATIO^ HOUSES. 
 
 There are no houses of assignation in Toronto in just the same 
 way as there are no houses of ill- fame, but there is hardly a prostitute 
 who meets you on the street who has not some place where she can 
 take you. The rooms are hired from the proprietor or proprietress at 
 so much per hour, the price being generally pretty high, and if refresh- 
 ments are desired they are furnished at an enormous price. Some of 
 these houses are locoted in respectable neighbourhoods, and in various 
 ways they soon acquire a notoriety amongst persons having use for 
 them. In the majority of them the proprietress resides alone, and her 
 visitors are persons of all classes of society. But of late years this class 
 of house has lost its value ; with the large number of rooms occupied 
 by young men, and the open sesame enjoyed by others, together 
 with the boat houses there is really little for them to do, and as a con- 
 sequence they are falling into the things of the past, but that they still 
 exist is beyond question. I was once in a barber shop, when after having 
 shaved me, the barber remarked mysteriously : 
 
 " Do you meet any women in the street?" 
 
 " Occasionally," I answered. 
 
 " Well, if you want a nice quiet place to go, come here, only 
 keep it q.t." ^ 
 
 CHURCHES AND THE CLERGY. 
 
 Toronto is essentiallyacity of churches, and glancing over the city 
 from the Eiffel tower of the Mail building, the many spires form a 
 really edifying sight, and there is scarcely a quarter passes but some 
 church is enlarging itself or planning to build elsewhere, especially is 
 this the case where a church divides against itself as occurred some 
 little time ago when one faction required that a certain preacher should 
 be employed, while another were equally determined that some one else 
 should have the honour. It is, of course, preposterous to say that these 
 rivals or rather differing factions quarrelled as that would imply a breach 
 of Christian discipline, and then, too, we knew that Christians never 
 quarrel ; but it is true that one branch of the church left it and built a 
 home for itself in a distant part of the city and under more congenial 
 circumstances. 
 
 In addition to the salaries given the Ministers, many of them also 
 receive residences. In this respect the Methodist ministers are favoured 
 
148 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 more, proportionately, than others. A number of them receive not only 
 the free use of a parsonage, but also of the furniture it contains. Several 
 Anglican clergymen have rectories and a few Presbyterian ministers 
 have the use of a manse included with the salary. But this extra pri- 
 vilege is limited to the larger and wealthier churches. Every catholic 
 priest is given his home and living but his salary is merely nominal. 
 Some of the priests in the city do not receive more than $200 00 a year 
 simply enough to buy their clothing. A certain priest much beloved 
 and revered, gets very little over $ioo.co a year for his personal use. 
 Ihe salaries named in connection with the Anglican clergymen do not 
 represent what the rectors get. They show only the sum paid by the 
 individual congregation. All rectors in the city, in addition to the 
 amounts paid them by the vestries receive endowments a share in the 
 Toronto Rectory Surplus Fund, and, in some cases, from the Commu- 
 tation Trust Fund. Otherwise the amounts paid by the congregations 
 to the rectors would seem very small, much smaller oftentimes than the 
 amounts paid to the curates of said churches. The salaries given in 
 connection with the Anglican churches represent what is paid the 
 rectors and curates. The ministers of a few sects, those of the Apostolic 
 church, the Christians, the Quakers and the Christadelphians receive 
 no stipulated salary being content to receive what is offered to them 
 vountarily. The appalling amount of $ 1,25 1,457 shows what the church 
 debt of the city and suburbs is. But this is not all. It really shows 
 only the bonded debt and the figures are either obtained irom the 
 registry office, the minutes of the churches or from responsible officials. 
 
 It is universally agreed that the morning attendance at anychurqh 
 fairly and justly represents the backbone of a church. Those who support 
 a church and are directly interested in its welfare are they, as a general 
 rule, who attend the morning service. Judged by this standard the 
 church debt is $68.42 per capita cr $21.91 for each seat 
 
 To the stranger visiting the city it is always a matter of delight to 
 contemplate the large number of young people who frequent the churches 
 and it is worthy of note that the attendance is not confined to one sex 
 but both are well represented. This applies with particular emphasis 
 to the evening services. This is as it should be. Any young man com- 
 mencing life in the city, and seeking advancement socially, financially 
 or otherwise, will find no habit that will produce such advantageous 
 results as to become a constant attendant at some church. It carries 
 with it a respectability that no other course of action does, while to 
 abstain from church going is almost sufficient to make him a social 
 outlaw. 
 
 Every reader doubtless remembers what were called the Chinese 
 atrocities some little time ago, when missionaries were ruthlessly put 
 to death in that country. In the light of my experience wirh church 
 members and Chinese in this country, I say all honor to the Chinese 
 for having wiped from the face of the earth the impertinent foieigners 
 whose presumption led them to that country to inculcate beliefs that 
 they did not want, and which might better be given to the country 
 they came from. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 149 
 
 Upon an occasion not long since past, I took a parcel of laundry 
 to a Chinaman, valued at two or three dollars. When I called for it 
 he informed me that he had had a fire and that my clothes were burned, 
 asking me at the same time their value. When I stated six dollars, he 
 tendered me that amount without a word of dissent. I accepted one 
 dollar for my loss, but the principle of the thing was there— he was 
 honest enough to pay me my own valuation. 
 
 In the month of August, 1892, a young man who sings in the 
 heavenly choir of one of the prominent Presbyterian churches of this 
 city, addressed me a letter asking me for thelo-'n of fifteen dollars and 
 stating that unless he had it by the 15th of the month his furniture 
 would be sold. I loaned him the money, glad to be of assistance to 
 him, and told him to be in no hurry in paying me. He accepted the 
 latter suggestion to the very letter, for he has not paid me yet. I have 
 asked him for it times without number, and even placed it in the hands 
 of a solicitor, but he never even answered either myself for the lawyer, 
 and I have not received one cent of it to this day. That is one case. 
 
 In 1890 a student from some religious school in Woodstock and 
 with whom I had become acquainted the previous summer, called at 
 the office where I was employed and asked for the loan of three dollars, 
 stating that he had remained in Toronto rather longer than he had 
 intended, and would require that amount in addition to what he had, 
 to settle his account at the hotel. A candidate for the ministry, his 
 father a wealtKy farmer — I loaned him five dollars without any hesita- 
 tion, and he promised to pay me the money by return mail. I have 
 not received it to this day. 
 
 Here is my experience with the Heathen Chinee and two Can- 
 adian "Christians." I hope the public will excuse me for saying so, 
 but I must express my unqualified admiration for the Chinese when 
 they made such short work of those people who went to their country 
 to teach them Christianity. 
 
 And it is ever thus. People are ready and even anxious to send 
 the glad tidings to all people, but are very apt to forget the sufferings 
 at home and the need of Christain charity nearer their own homes. 
 
 When an appeal was made to assist " bleeding Armenia " indigna- 
 tion meetings were held all over the country protesting against Eng- 
 land's inactivity in bringing the Sultan to time. Yet on the day that 
 a long list of contributors to the Armenian fund was published in a 
 Toronto paper, a poor wretch was tried before Colonel Denison for steal- 
 ing twenty-five cents worth of coal to keep his starving children from 
 being frozen to death. 
 
 These are exemples of Christian churches. 
 
 In addition to the churches proper, there are scores of young 
 peoples* societies of every possible description, and others toe numerous 
 to mention. One of these is called by the sublime and divine title of 
 " The King's Daughters," the king in question, being presumably, the 
 Almighty, inasmuch as there is at present only one rigning king, he of 
 Denmark, and I do not think he is the father of such a numerous 
 
150 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 family, nor do I think he would feel flattered at having such a multifa- 
 rious family. I believe the daughters are religiously inclined, but the 
 Empire gives us an instance where even religion seemed to satiate and 
 a deviation was made in favour of the skirt dunce: 
 
 Young women who call themselves the King's daughters have been skirtdancing in 
 public at Hamilton. They are now discussing pro and con the question of womanly propriety 
 involved in their conduct. This should have occurred to them before they danced. They 
 hardly know themselves why they did it, or where they found the precedent. Lady Russell has 
 skirt danced on a public stage, but it did not matter so much to her ; besides she is not a 
 
 Crincess. There is no heavenly authority for the thing. Skirt dancing was originally copied 
 y the stage from Spanish women of elastic modesty. It has been condemned by the Christian 
 churches, out has been adopted in what is called "smart " society, wher« king's daughters do 
 not, as a general thing, foregather. 
 
 This is a delightful occupation, and I am sure will be a cause for 
 congratulation for the public to know that the young ladies can so easily 
 depart from the rugged path of religious practice to the more worldly 
 delights of questionable pleasure. 
 
 In connection with these daughters is also a kind of street show, 
 I suppose you might call it, consisting of an old organ or melodeon, 
 and some male and female voices, not specially noted for their accuracy 
 of rendition or sweetness of expression, who congregate on the corner 
 of Richmond and Yonge streets on Sunday evenings, and which are 
 addressed by dififerent people present, in a manner, quite frequently^ 
 that would send Her Majesty to a mad house from the manner in which 
 her English is so diabolically murdered. However, if good is accom- 
 plished thereby, it is not for me to say anything against it, even though 
 I very much question this result. 
 
 The Salvation army, with headquarters on Albert street was com- 
 menced in London in 1864. Within the decade following the organ- 
 ization was strong enough to undertake foreign conquest, and its legions 
 began the conquest of America via Canada. They came, as it has proved 
 to stay, and to-day their sanguinary banner waves over barracks in 
 nearly every city and town throughout the Dominion of Canada and 
 the States, not to speak of other quarters of the globe. I visited their 
 headquarters once, and I am only doing justice to the organization in 
 expressing the highest appreciation of their methods for the salvation 
 of souls. A coarse-prize-fighter-looking Englishman with a decided 
 accent was the presiding genius on this occasion, and his language was 
 decidedly refreshing to say the least. In the course of his address he 
 sent people to hell in a manner that was really edifying, though he did 
 not inform his andience when or under what circumstances the Almighty 
 had delegated to him this authority. But that he was divinely inspired 
 could readily be uuderstood from the flippant familiarity with which 
 he spoke of and to God and His Son. 
 
 He was followed by a young woman in an immense Persian lamb 
 cap, which gave her the appearance of a female grenadier. Her voice 
 had a decidedly twangy sound, and doubtless after hearing; it many a 
 poor sinner wished he were dead. She spoke of the words of Christ 
 where he admonishes the young man " to go and sin no more." The 
 young woman marched up and down the plateform with her arm? in 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 151 
 
 front of her at right angles, repeating with exasperating persistency 
 that formula, *' go and sin no more," she pronounced as one word as 
 though to rhyme with sycamore. Her address was very edifying. It 
 must have been, for I nevrr heard its like before nor since. At its con- 
 clusion some boys were threatened with immediate ejection for misbe- 
 having themselves. Poor boys ! The wonder to me was not so much 
 that they whispered during this address, but that they did not go up 
 in a body and strangle the speaker. Had their ear drums not been of 
 a peculiar structure, thai; rasping voice must have split them. The 
 address itself was not much worse that I have frequently heard from 
 Doctors of Divinity, and she used the same means when suddenly 
 brought to a full stop in a spasmodic flight of oratory, such as " Glory 
 be to God," " Bless His Name," and such like which have such a son- 
 orous roll in the mouth of the charlatan. If any converts were ever 
 made tinough that woman's agency it niust have been a miracle. I 
 think I speak for the majority when I say that after hearing that rasp- 
 ing monotone they were seized with an intense desire to murder the 
 speaker. I have not the slightest doubt, however, that if the young 
 woman were asked the question she would probably answer that she 
 had been " called " by God to preach. 
 
 Then one man gave his experience. His language and mode of 
 delivery were certainly original. He paid a tribute to the army for 
 rescuing him from the beggarly elements, and blamed the churches for 
 not having exerted themselves to do this, though he did not mention 
 the particular church that had been derelict in this respect. Then he 
 proceeded to tell of his improvement and if he had ever been worse 
 than he was at that particular time, he must have been pretty bad. He 
 paced up and down in the limited space of four or five feet, like a wild 
 animal in a cage, and his eyes gleamed like a hyena's, while his words 
 were hissed out in something the same manner as a hungry lion might 
 be supposed to emit a succession of growls while guarding a piece of 
 meat from a comrade. It was a succession of snarls. Then God was 
 praised in a " hymn " the chorus of which was " My Savior is a Jolly 
 Good Fellow, My Savior's a Jolly Good Fellow &c., &c.," and I felt 
 that the heavenly host must have been edified by this tribute of famili- 
 arity with the Son of God. 
 
 Apart, however, from the objectionable style of oratory, I have 
 just given, no one can deny the immense, or indeed, the immeasurable 
 amount of good that has been, and is being, done by the better element 
 of the Salvation Army. By the better element I mean the men and 
 women of judgment and sense to guide them. I do not think the char- 
 acters I have described could do any good anywhere, but they are not 
 the whole Salvation Army. I have repeatedly heard the ensign in 
 Montreal, whose text was about this : '* I do not care what you are. I 
 say nothing against any religion, Baptist, Presbyterian, Catholic, Met- 
 hodist or anything else, so long as it makes you good." I never heard 
 any man or woman speak like that before, and I never was impressed 
 before as I was then. When I was told of the work that had been done 
 
152 OF TORONTO TUB GOOD. 
 
 in reforming drunkards and thieves and criminals of all classes, I could 
 readily understand it. That man did not send people to hell off hand 
 as though Christ had commissioned him to do so. Me was filled with 
 love and sympathy. A man who was timekeeper on the wharf at $9.00 
 per week, and who had spent two terms in gaol for stealing, had Ijeen 
 rescued by the Salvation Army. Another who had been dismissed 
 from the Grand Trunk for drunkenness is now getting $15.00 per week, 
 and is a respectable citizen. He was rescued by the Army. And such 
 cases I am told are countless. My informant was particular to impress 
 upoii my mind that the Salvation Army reached people that the 
 churches could not reach. My ;wn opinion is that they reach people 
 the churches would not wish to reach. I once heard a Methodist D.D., 
 long since passed to his " reward " state that he would not condescend 
 to do this, and would not condescend to do that. I consider that man 
 a disgrace to Christianity as well as a perjurer. But it is just such as he 
 who are responsible for the almost universal agnosticism that prevails 
 to-day. Imagine Christ informing people that he would not condes- 
 cend to do this or that ? Churches might easily follow the example of 
 the Salvation Army, if they arc in the field for doing good. Is it any 
 wonder that the City Missionary, Mr. R. Hall, stated that in Toronto 
 more than one hundred thousand people who have reached years of 
 responsibility have not been brought face to face with the gospel, and 
 that the number of those who are indifferent in the matter of religion 
 in increasing ? Surely not. 
 
 Apropos of the style of singing the churches have imparted unto 
 themselves the following appeared in the Globe : 
 
 We are aware that several books without words have been put upon the market, but the 
 general hymn book such as hymns ancient and modern of the Church of Flngland has not yet 
 made its appearance. When it do^s co ne, it is to be sincerely hoped that it will be free from 
 the tunes of objectionable form and character, many of which should be consigned to the region 
 of the burnt cork fraternity. "Tit-willow" and " Robin Adair" are all right in their proper 
 places, but should not be introduced into hymn books and set to sacred words. Tunes of the 
 Mc(iraiiahan type should be relegated to just where they belong, and that is anywhere but in 
 church. The good and true and jnire in style tunes are the only ones that will endure. They 
 are inspiration as much as sacred poetry. None other should be admitted into use. The 
 bookmaking and bookselling (or a profit should for once be .set firmly aside in the desire to aid 
 the great cause of religion and promote the common good of the great mass of the denomination. 
 
 Music in in churches has become, like the oratory, a matter of 
 catching the crowd, and some of the most beautiful lines that have 
 ever been composed are set to music that has been originally produced 
 and properly belongs to the concert hall or New York dance house. 
 "Nearer My God to Thee " is improved upon by singing to the tune of 
 "Robin Adair," while a rollicking prayer meeting piece called "Happy 
 on the Way " is sung to the tune of " Old Roger Ram." The old negro 
 melody " None knew but to love thee " supplies the tune for a favourite 
 prayer meeting selection running something like this " He's the lily of 
 the valley, the bright and morning star, He's the fairest of ten thou.sand 
 to my soul." During the progress of a prayer meeting or revival one 
 of the favourite "hymns " was a parody on the negro melody " Keep 
 in de middle of de road," the leader of the movement — the illustrious 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 1B3 
 
 Jones — remarking that he liked the piece because there was so much 
 gospel in it. 
 
 Whit sublime conception! 
 
 In the fulness of time we shall no doubt require no music whatever 
 by which the lines are to be sung, the preacher will simply give out the 
 hymn in this fixshion : " Hymn 350, Nearer my God to Thee, please 
 sing to the tune of little Anny Rooney." 
 
 In the Methodist churches some time ago congregational singing 
 was one of its peculiar attractions and characteristics, but after their 
 copyright ran out a new hymn book was issued, and the lower notes 
 transposed, or new music substituted so that now few members of the 
 congregation presume to assist the choir in their laudable efforts to 
 praise God in the old time fashion. The following taken from the 
 Telegram gives their opinion of what they are pleased to call Musical 
 Pharisees : 
 
 Organists and solists do not always add strength or significance to the religious services 
 at which they assist. 
 
 A player or singer whose brain or voice is ruled by the prejudices that condemn the 
 music that people love, can do more than a rainstorm to dampen a meeting. Their playing and 
 singing are (Jreek to the multitude. The taotes of an average congregation may be common, 
 but they are the outcome of sympathies and emotions common to the whole human family, and 
 musicians cannot educate them out of a fondness for tun'.^s that ajipeal to our deepest exper- 
 ience in the language of the heart. Toronto has many players and singers who to high culture 
 add 3 true appreciation of the worth and pi iwer that may dwell in music stamped as popular. 
 It also ahs its share of musical pharisees who make the organ growl or their voices tremble in 
 the vicinity of high, in efforts to express the artist's thankfulness to the Al/nijjhty that he or she 
 is superior to the common herd. Meantime the common herd does not find m music tne wings 
 upon which its thoughts can soar heavenward. Its s.iddened heart is possessed by a simple 
 desire to assassinate the organist whose playing is not an act of worship, but an endeavour to 
 exploit his acquaintance with the old masters. The organist with all his antice and the tastes 
 that separate him from the multitude is preferable to the soprano soloist who at the close of a 
 pathetic heart-searching sermon arises to cloud the preacher's description of the Golden City 
 with " Nearer my f lod to Thee " screeched out in a steam whistle voice. 
 
 I was invited on one of my visits to Toronto to visit a fashionable 
 church and was informed that I would probably see the largest choir 
 consisting of fifty two voices, and the best music that ever fell to my 
 lot to hear. The singers arrayed before me ran, in ages, all the way 
 from seventeen to seventy, and it is to be observed t 'lat this was a model 
 choir, notwithstanding the fact, and I speak with all deference, that it 
 occurred to me that it was more like the dumping ground for all the 
 old stagers in the church than that they were there for their musical 
 ability. 
 
 One little man, who occupied the seat with some four or five ladies 
 who sang soprano, appeared to be the chosen comedian of the church. 
 He smirked pleasantly to the young ladies as they entered the church, 
 and subsequently made faces at them to demonstrate, I presume, that 
 he had not forgetten them as the services progressed. 
 
 One young lady sitting on a front seat in the same choir seemed 
 to be afflicted with tight boots, for she stooped down and gracefully, 
 and without embarrassment removed the guilty shoe, while her count- 
 enance shone with a heavenly radiance as her torture was temporarily 
 suspended, so that there can be no doubt that choirs as they are row 
 
154 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 composed, are not, as has been popularly supposed little lower than 
 the angels. 
 
 My friend who had extended me the invitation was prone to be 
 somewhat snappish when I expressed my inability to appreciate the 
 music rendered, and those who rendered it, and yet I was assured that 
 the young lady who removed her shoe made a practice of doing it every 
 Sunday, and the young gentleman who acted the clown was a very 
 superior person indeed. That he had, in fact, left a choir because the 
 leader thereof had committed the unpardonable breach of decorum or 
 Christian discipline, or something of that kind, by singing in a theatre ! 
 
 I submit the following as representing some of the words rendered : 
 
 Oh, to be nothing, nothing, only to lie at his feet 
 A broken and emptied vessel tor the master's use made meet, 
 Emptied that he might fill nie, as forth from his service I go. 
 Emptied that so unliindered that life through me might flow. 
 
 I do not think anyone could by any possibility compose more 
 trashy or nonsensical sentimental drivel than that, yet the people who 
 sang it are supposed to be " clothed and in their right mind." 
 
 What unmitigated rot it must appear to any sensible being when 
 he analyzes the language of some of the hymns sung : 
 
 " I nightly pitch my moving tent " 
 
 is nothing but an absolute lie. Another one informs us that 
 
 " In his arms he carries them all day long." 
 
 What a pair of arms Christ must have in the lively imagination 
 of some people. 
 
 This is fairly good : 
 
 I can believe, I do believe that Jesus died for me 
 A token of His love he gave a pledge of liberty. 
 
 I once heard it sung to the tune of some flippant wait? in the 
 following language : 
 
 I can, I will and I do believe, I can I will and I do believe 
 That Jesus died for me. 
 
 There is life for a look at the crucified one. 
 There is life at this moment for thee 
 Then look sinner look un o him and be saved 
 Unto him who was nailed to the tree. 
 
 It cannot be denied, after hearing the above that " life " is offered 
 pretty cheap, though it is a matter of regret that we were not informed 
 where, by looking, we should see. 
 
 * 
 
 I have a Saviour, He's pleading in glory, 
 
 A dear precious Saviour though earth's friends be few 
 
 And now He is watching in tenderness o'er me 
 
 Oh, that my dear Saviour was your Saviour too. 
 
 For you I am praying, for you I am praying 
 
 For you I am praying, I'm praying lor you. _ : — - 
 
 I think the above about as fine as piece of Pharisaic twaddle as 
 any impaired imagination could conceive. - _ ..—- 
 
 Then be hushed my dark spirit the worst that can come 
 , Will hasten my journey and hasten me home. 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 155 
 
 In spite of the above sentimental couplet, I do not know of any- 
 one who has ever seemed anxious to hasten home. In fact quite the 
 reverse has always appeared to me to be the case. 
 
 Some say that John the Baptist was nothing but a Jew 
 But the bible doth inform us that he was a preacher too. 
 He rose, He rose, He. rose from the dead 
 And the Lord did take my spirit home. 
 
 I do not quite understand the drift of the foregoing breakdown, 
 but I suppose it must be all right, as itjis sung in some of the churches. 
 
 Come Holy Spirit, Heavenly done, with all thy quickening power 
 Come shed abroad thy sacred light on these cold heartsfot ours. 
 
 The above was sung by a full chours, then a young lady elegantly 
 dressed, moistened her lips and sang : 
 
 See how we grovel, here below, fond of these earthly ioys,;fond of these earthly joya 
 In vain we strive to reach, to reach eternal joys. 
 
 I feel constrained to observe that it would essentially require the . 
 telescopic eye of the Almighty to see any signs of grovelling on the 
 part of those who sang the foregoing. In fact they seemed to be quite 
 well pleased with themselves. 
 
 When in the fullness of time, common sense has become epidemic, 
 and those who have not been vaccinated read such sentimental, senseless 
 drivel as is contained in a large number of the effusions called by 
 courtesy hyms, I think they will understand why church members 
 generally so strongly protest against the cold light of reason being 
 thrown upon so-called Christianity by such master minds as Colonel 
 Ingersoll, Bradlaugh and others, although they claim that Christianity 
 is as firmly fixed as the rocks of Gibralter, 
 
 DWELLIx^G IN UNITY. 
 
 There is troubie in Centenary Church choir, arising, it is said, over the introduction of 
 some new voices from the Sunday school. An objection was made by some oi the members to 
 singing with the younger people, and, as a result, a number, if not all, of the choir members 
 have been requested by the choirmaster, L. II. Parker, to hand in their resignations. — Hamilton 
 Spectator. 
 
 In a number of churches the singing is a matter not in any respect 
 second to the preacher, and salaried singers are quite numerous, as 
 indeed they should be. One might suppose that the array of talent 
 would conflict, each supposing that they were the attraction ; but as the 
 majority of sensible people know that the preacher is above such petty 
 j'ealousy, and the choir soloists equally unsophisticated, this element 
 does not, happily, enter into consideration, both being thoroughly 
 conscious of their powers to please. In Ottawa recently when a singer 
 belonging to one of the opera companies was announced to sing in a 
 certain church, and quite a large crowd had gone to hear him, the 
 preacher announced that before taking up the collection those who had 
 come to hear the singing might retire, and the singer did not render 
 the solo expected of him. 
 
 Jealousy on the part of the preacher } 
 
 Not at all, though evil disposed persons stated that once when 
 
156 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Mr. Jarvis or Mr. Douglas Bird had been advertised to sing in that 
 church it was crowded to the doors, and many could hardly gain ad- 
 mittance, but to suppose the circumstances had any relation would be 
 absurd, even though these same people considered it a gratuitous insult 
 to them to have such a speech made by a preacher concerning the 
 collection. It is quite true that he was within his rights to speak as he 
 did, but was it the action of a gentleman, let alone a Christian ? 
 
 Some time ago, quite a controversy took place in the city news- 
 papers concerning the music rendered in Bond street Congregational 
 church, and I thought it was about time someone bestirred himself in 
 that direction, although I only visited the church once. A yourg lady, 
 whose name I do not know, arose and sang " The Better Land," or 
 perhaps I might say with greater truth she attempted to sing it, as 
 having heard it sung by a competent vocalist, I could hardly under- 
 stand that the young lady in question should be paid for such work, 
 and it remained a mystery to me why a church so wealthy as they were 
 reputed to be, should not have Creditable singing. 
 
 In his paper on the place of music in the sanctuary, read before the 
 Presbyterian Ministerial association, Rev. Dr. McTavish pointed out 
 that the tendency of the present day was towards transforming the 
 services of praise into a sacred concert. He maintained the music in 
 the place mentioned should only be used for devotion purpose. The 
 paper which was clear and logicr.l throughout, occasioned a large amount 
 of discussion. The was a substantial unanimity of feeling in regard to 
 the position that music kept within proper bounds was indispensab'*"; 
 to the proper carrying on of Christian worship. The point that pro- 
 voked most argument was the question as to how far classical music 
 should be permitted. Rev. John Neil said that as so few people knew 
 how to appreciate this class of uiusic it should be relegated from the 
 service altogether. Rev. D. J. Macdonnell took an entirely different 
 view. The higher class the instrumental and vocal portion of the ser- 
 vice could be made the more beneficial to the great mass of the people 
 church-going would become. 
 
 Another subject in connection with the churches is the subject of 
 church entertainments. You remember how Paul states that God 
 dwelleth not in temples built with hands ? So now in accordance with 
 that view the house dedicated to an all wise and just Providence is 
 used for giving "grand sacred concerts/' the Jubilee singers, and differ- 
 ent entertainments of a like character. The Rev. Dr. Hall in the 
 course of an address urged strongly that all buildings consecrat|2d to 
 God should not be desecrated by unholy entertainments. By these a 
 moral germ of disease might be introduced and he, for one, would do 
 everything tc keep it out. Debt was also a bad thing, and he thought 
 that in many cases with a little extra exertion on the part of the con- 
 gregation this might be avoided. 
 
 Ihe premises were good, but how many churches would agree to 
 such sentimental expression. However, Dean Wade of Woodstock, ii 
 the course of an address on the subject does not take the mild and easy 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 157 
 
 manner of Dr. Hall, but strikes out from the shoulder and expresses 
 himself in a fashion not to be mistaken. 
 
 He stated that he did not propose to deal with methods for raising money for any man 
 made institution, but for the church of God. He said that the title of his paper would indicate 
 that something counter to apostolic usage and custom in the matter of raising church funds 
 had obtained ; something in direct opposition to all that was scriptural and apostoiie, and 
 which was eating the vitality of the church It had been said in defense of the modern method, 
 that while as a rule, good people would be so influenced by the holy ghost as to give of their 
 substanc to the cause of God that there were places and circumstances when pressing needs 
 called for the adoption of unscriptural methods. In plain English the poor cause should depend 
 upon weak supports. The weaker the cause the more dependent upon the promises and faith- 
 fulness of God. This was what God's people believed. The poorer the congregation, the 
 greater need there was to depend upon the infinite resources of God. There was a time when 
 Christians were taught that with the presence of Christ and congregation when two or three 
 might be assured of all its needs being met, but things had altered. The heavens were impen- 
 atrable brass ; the cry of God's elect was lost in space ; we should put our wits to work. We 
 were going to run this church, and we meant to succeed We form a committee, each member 
 of which acts as a spy to ascertain the nakedness of the land We agreed that the church could 
 not be kept without money, we could not get the money without the crowd How should we 
 get both .' We should get something great'.y in demand. What would catch the crowd. What 
 was in demand in every city, town, village and hamlet ? That which would satisfy the claims 
 of the devil, the world and the flesh. We are bound to make the church a success anyhow. 
 This is the committee's set purpose. We will get consecration money if we can, but we will 
 get money, money ! The man of modern methods had this excuse : Modern methods find work 
 ior young Christians, and by employing them in a good cause they are kept from evil associa- 
 rions. In other words, that by the church catering for the passion for pleasure there is a guar- 
 antee that the young will not seek for such satisfaction in the pomps and vanities of the wicked 
 world, which they have renounced. The only y ower which can keep the young Christian is 
 that mentioned by Peter : Kept by power of God. Modern methods of raising church funds 
 were both dishonouring to God. and disastrous to the church's best interests All hope of the 
 church fulfilling her mission lies in her being faithful to God and to herself as the bride of 
 Christ. The modern methods are i. The encouragement of Christians to rob God. 2. The 
 sin of obtaining under false pretences 3. The sin of helping to develop a passion which was 
 one of the greatest hindrances to true religion Dealing with the first method he said that it 
 was evident that God was being robbed, else modern methods would not be adopted to make 
 up the deficiency. Dealing with the second method, he said that people, goodly people, and 
 goody goody people bought tickets for church shows in order that they may support the church. 
 The vendor sells them, and the purchaser buys them under conditions of sale. The thing is a 
 fraud. The church belonc^s to God. He can provide for his own house. Dealing with the 
 third method, he said that ii many places the church is robbing the world of itn legitimate 
 means of amusing the world. Now let us give the world and even the devil its due. Theatrical 
 companies need not visit certain towns. Clowns, harlequins and negro minstrels and crack 
 singers are at a discount in many parishes. The church provides for all that is neressarv for 
 both saint and sinner. Let me read a portion of an advertisement which appeared in a Brock- 
 ville paper in November, 1891 ; 
 
 " Novel soiree under the anspices of church. Miss Blank, Prescott's sweet can- 
 
 africr is herself a treat. The Russian tea, attended by all the placid loveliness of the ice clad 
 steppes of Russian Siberia. The lemon queezer adorned by beauty and grace (who will no 
 doubt squeeze you all they can). All will be born to the land of weird and phanton spirits where 
 all will be surrounded by the dark and mystic enchantments of the future. Be prepared for 
 extra charge. One continual strain of music Before the morning breaks the sweet and gliding 
 music intermingled with leels and graces of ye ancient and modern lassies will be of the past. 
 Doors open at 8 o'clock ; tickets 25 cents, including past or present supper." 
 
 Dean Wade had fond in the same paper immediately under the 
 above this notice : 
 
 A chicken pie social at the M. E. Church Morristown last week realized about $17, and 
 about 100 people ate pie until they could not talk. 
 
 He said that sort of thing was going on all over the country. In an advertisement of a 
 lawn social given at Woodstock last fall this appeared: The refreshments will be all the 
 season's delicacies, and in addition an ambrosial nectar, made from a receipt from which the 
 ancients prepared the feasts for their gods will be served A witty Presbyterian elder had said : 
 And now brethren, let us get up a supper and eat ourselves rich. Buy your food and give it to 
 the church. Then go buy it back again. Then eat it up and your churuh debt is paid." 
 
 The dfian read an extract from a handbill which he said was not the handbill of a theatre. 
 
15S OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 but that of a church, where periodical revivals of religion were alleged to take place. The bill 
 read : A star of the first magnitude. A grand high class concert will be given on Friday 
 March i6th, in the Blank church. The remainder of the bill was devoted to eulogiums descrip- 
 tive of those who were to perform. He said that one of the songs rendered from the pulpit of 
 the church upon that occasion was by a gentleman who kept constantly asserting that somebody 
 grew more like his daddy every day. He continued : " One might hear such tomfoolery one 
 night and the next from the same pulpit the most sacred ot subjects treated upon. To-night 
 the banjo, niggers and bones, to-morrow the penitent forms and groans. An infidel might go 
 to the doors any evening and ask as he might at a theatre, what is on to-night, is it a play, a 
 ministrel show, or a revival .' " 
 
 As might be expected from the above remarks by gentlemen who 
 are not likely to detract from any church what is meritorious, the 
 churches teem with attractions every Sunday. If you will consult the 
 Saturday Telegram, you can scarcely fail to find something to suit you. ' 
 Like the merchant, or the theatre, the church of God advertises its 
 wares to the wayfarer, and he is lamentably fastidious, who, consulting 
 the bountiful bill of fare placed before him, finds nothing to his taste. 
 I regret I cannot give you the whole bill as it appeared, but I submit 
 the following for your consideration as fair examples : 
 
 CARLETON STREET METHODIST CHURCH 
 
 REV. JAMES HENDERSON PASTOR. 
 
 SABBATH, AUGUST, 2ist, 1892. 
 
 1 1 a.m., Rev. Dr. Barrass — Subject, Holiniiss on the bells of the horses. 
 7 p.m.. Rev. J. E. Lancel", Castor of St. Paul's Methodist church. 
 
 PROGRAMME : 
 
 Anthem Great'is the Lord , Sydenham. 
 
 Solo, Zion Rodney Mr. Chattoe. 
 
 Quartette Abide with me .., Torrington. 
 
 Solo Humbly before thee. . . Millard — Miss Hortensc Jones. 
 
 Miss Jones resides at St. Antonio Texas and is a graduate of the Boston Conservatory of Masic. 
 
 Holiness on the bells of the horses ! what rot ! 
 Please don't forget the solo of Miss Jones who is a graduate of the 
 Boston Conservatory of Music 
 
 BOND STREET CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH 
 
 REV. JOSEPH WILD, D.D., PASTOR. 
 
 Anniversary services, Sunday October 2nd, 1892. 
 Special Music by the choir. 
 
 Morning at 11 o clock — Subjects — Twelve years' work. Cornet solo, Master Bertie Plant. 
 Evening at 7 o'clock, subject How long will things continue as theyjare. Saxaphone solo. 
 Hymn with variations, Mr. Bert Kennedy. The usual anniversary collec ions will be taken up. 
 
 A cornet solo and a saxaphone solo ! Quite a band concert. 
 
 BERKLEY STREET METHODIST CHURCH. 
 
 Rev, W. Galbraith, L.L.B., pastor, will preach ail a.m., and 7 p.m. Morning A defective 
 ministry. 7 p m., A great reformation needed. Good music. \U welcome. Sunday school and 
 bible class at 2.45. 
 „ _ E. Coatsworth, M. P., superintendent. , " 
 
 BROADWAY TABERNACLE ----; 
 
 REV. J. PHILP, MJl., PASTOR. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 159 
 
 Sunday October 2, 1893, sermons by the pastor. 11 a.m., A character study. 7 p.m.. 
 Success or failure. Lessons for all to learn. Miss Bonsall, the popular and favourite contralto 
 will sing at the evening service. All made welcome. 
 
 Miss Bonsall seemed not to hare been sufficiently attractive to 
 keep the public always amused, as the following seems to testify : 
 
 ' BROADWAY METHODIST TABERNACLE 
 
 LEAGUE SUNDAY. OCT. 6th. 1895, 
 
 Sunrise Prayer Meeting, 7 a.m. 8 a.m. 
 
 Sermon to Young People, 1 1 a.m. and 7 p.m., by Rev. Ward B. Pickard, of Hornells- 
 ville, N.Y. 
 
 Special musical service in the evening by a choir of sixty voices, undei the direction of 
 Mr. E. R. Doward. 
 
 Organ Recital by Mr, Doward 6.30 to 7 p.m. 
 
 Soprano Solo and Chorus . " Inflammatus " Rossini 
 
 Tenor Recit "Comfort Ye" HanuJ 
 
 Tenor Air ■• Every Valley " Handel 
 
 Chorus " And the Glory of the Lord " Handel 
 
 Baritone Solo " The Palms " Faure 
 
 Chorus. " Hallelujah " Handel 
 
 Monday Evening, Oct., 7th— Lecture, " The House That Jack Built," 8 p.m. by Rev. 
 Ward B. Pickard. Special Music. Collection. 
 
 I consider the above nearly perfect, you have the whole programme 
 presei:ted to you, no opera could do more than that. • 
 
 BROADWAY METHODIST TABERNACLE. 
 
 REV. J. C. SPEER, PASTOR. 
 
 S. S. ANNIVERSARY. 
 
 SUNDAY, MAY 3rd, 1896. 
 
 II a.m.. and 7 p.m.. Rev. John Philp, D.D. 
 
 3. p.m , Rev. W, F. Wilson, 7 p.m , Rev. A. B. Chambers. 
 Offerings of the day are in aid of school. 
 
 Grand Chorus of 50* voices, assisted^by great organ and first-class orchestra will lead 
 the service of song at each service. 
 
 MONDAY, MAY 4th, SUNDAY SCHOOL ENTERTAINMENT. 
 
 Splendid Programme — Solos, duets, dialogues, recitations, kindergarten, songs and drills 
 choruses, (including " With Sheathed Swords,")jorchestral selections, etc, etc. 
 Doors open at 7.15 p.m. To commence at 8 o'clock. 
 
 You still see the marks ot progress, which rivals any of Corinne's 
 performances, chorus and orchestra ; songs and drills : One step further 
 — costuming the performers in tights — and the theatre is outdone. 
 
 Wilson family of revival v/orkers at Broadway Tabernacle to-night, splendid singing. 
 You are invited, Mrs. Wilson is a sister of the late P. P. Bliss. 
 
 Don't forget that Mrs. Wilson is a sister of P. P. Bliss, which in 
 itself ought to be sufficient to attract the multitude. 
 
 A while ago some of the female portion of one of the many Met- 
 hodist churches were given " talents " in order that they might show 
 what they were able to accomplish with them in a given time. A meeting 
 was held and the results announced. Business men who read the reports 
 must have felt astounded at what some of them had been able to do. 
 I venture to assert that there was not a single woman in the crowd 
 
160 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 whose transactions were strictly honorable. How they increased them 
 God only knows, and it was a wise dispensation that required them 
 not to explain how they realized such marvellous increases, or I think 
 some peculiar and shady transactions would have been brought to light. 
 If Christ be in heaven at the present time, I think his face must wear 
 a puzzled expression many a time and oft when money is paid into His 
 Church to be used for Him, and He knows how it was come by. 
 
 If the son of God were to make Hii> second coming and were to be 
 advertised as going to preach, would his sermon or the singing be the 
 attraction ? 
 
 I regret that I have no circus advertisement at hand just now, or 
 I would give you that also for your comparison. 
 
 That prince of satirists, Max O'Rell gives the following as having 
 appeared in some paper in the United States, and he seemed to regard 
 them as something most extraordinary. It may be said as an extenua- 
 ting circumstance in his favour that he probably has never seen the 
 Saturday Telegram, and consulted its church announcements. 
 
 To make sure that he will be believed, he asserts that " he copies 
 them word for word." 
 
 4 - MUSICAL EVANGELIST 
 
 Solos. Short sermons. The place to be happy and saved. Walk in, ladies and gentle- 
 men, walk ill. 
 
 The Other more seductive still, was worded thus : 
 
 No reason for not coming. Free seats. Books supplied to the congregation. 
 The public are requested to leave the books in the seats after use. 
 
 Some little controversy has lately taken place in the newspapers 
 respecting Sunday schools, and one Episcopal clergyman has had the 
 effrontery to question their usefulness, bringing out opinions, good, bad 
 and indifferent. Judging from an impartial standpoint, I think Sunday 
 sr^'^nls are a modern innovation inspired of the devil, but representing 
 nevertheless, the progress of modern civilization, one of the salient 
 features of which is to shunt our responsibility upon somebody else. 
 People send their children to swelter and chafe in a Sunday school to 
 Itarn what they are too lazy, too indifferent, too sinful themselves, to 
 impart, or practice themselves as a living example to their children. I 
 was about to add that they were also too ignorant, but no one Is too 
 ignorant to teach in a Sunday school. I was at a school once where 
 one verse in the lesson started " Howbeit the high priest " and in the 
 course of the review the teacher asked " Now, who was Howbeit the 
 high priest ! " I attended Sunday school myself, until I was thirteen, 
 and I only say the truth when I tell you that it was simply a species 
 of hell to be cooped up in that place for two hours on a Sunday, and I 
 think that is the experience of ninety out of a hundred children. My 
 surprise is that the majority of children are not infidels, when they 
 reflect that they are compelled to sacrifice their pleasure and conve- 
 nience to learn a religion they care nothing about, — whose only virtue 
 is that it has a good appearance and creates a good impression ; part- 
 
OP TOJRONTO THE GOOD. 161 
 
 icularly when they reach the age of reason and reflect on the characters 
 of some of those who teach them ; and that people send them there to 
 escape the responsibilities they are supposed to undertake themselves, 
 Duc never think of doing. 
 
 I consider that it would be extremely presumptuous on my part 
 to enter into a dissertation on the opinions children entertain for Sun- 
 day schools, but I refer you to Dickens' Bleak House and Mrs. Par- 
 diggle and her children for the moral lesson I frankly acknowledge my 
 inability to write. 
 
 Thost of us who believe that without the strength and hope of Christianity, this life 
 would be brutalized and this world a desert are given many a heart ache by the charges of 
 meanness which worldlings hurl with only too much truth against employers conspicuous for 
 their goodness on Sunday. Of course, little is said about the sins of men who do not pretend 
 to be any better on Sunday than they are the other six days of the week. The men who force a 
 contrast between their pretensions in church and their practices in business arc the subjects of 
 most frequent attack. Business men might hesitate before they identify the blessed laws of their 
 Lord and Saviour with the cruel law of " supply and demand. They make the laws of" supply 
 and demand " their rule of life on week days, and Sunday are foremost in the temples of Him 
 who established the law of love. Yes, and they are liberal givers to the church and to many 
 good causes. The day will come when the church will scorn to take the money of men who 
 cultivate the virtue of generosity, but neglect the scant justice of giving the girls who work for 
 them enough to pay their board. Much that the pulpit saj^s of the press is true, and it is no: 
 sparing in its criticism. There is no desire to harshly criticise, but if the ministers of this city 
 did as their Master would have done, the church would be too hot to hold gentlemen who give 
 girls thirty cents tor ten hours' work, and allow girls who sometimes handle thousands per day 
 the magnificent stipend of $3 per week. — Telegram. 
 
 So far as the above is concerned, I heartily concur in every word 
 of it, and add that there is not a single clergyman in the city of Tor- 
 onto who would dare to denounce the rascality of a rich member of his 
 congregation, or one who employs cheap labor. The charges against 
 the late Mr. Jeffrey, which broke his heart are too fresh in the minds 
 of clergyman to permit of their running any risks, even if they had the 
 courage, which is extremely doubtful. But the time will never come 
 when the church will scorn to take the money of men who cultivate 
 the virtue of generosity, 
 
 A city paper in replying to Rev. Dr. Potts .said they could not 
 accept his example as an infallible guide. They cannot evade a public 
 duty by seeking an asylum in generalities — the coward's refuge. Jour- 
 nals are not gifted with the commanding presence or the robust voice 
 of Dr. Potts. And fortunately few of them are able to flee to the past 
 for a retreat from present duty. The esteemed and estimable doctor 
 is a Protestant of tlie historic school. He avoids making an enemy of 
 the mammon of political unrighteousness by keeping two or three 
 hundred years behind the procession of events. When the Jesuit Bill 
 was calling Canadians to battle for principle against privilege Dr. Potts 
 w.is knee deep in the Boyne's red flood, or fighting valiantly on the 
 walls of Derry, Protestantism was not calling its soldiers to win at the 
 Boyne, or to man the walls of the maiden city. It urged Canadians to 
 offend party for the sake of principle, and its mess.sage was unheeded 
 b}' Dr. Potts and other gentleman like him whose silence was as favour- 
 able as his words could be to the cause of aggression. 
 
 I do not consider the great and overwelming majority of Protest- 
 ant preachers of the present day any higher than the lowest and most 
 
tea OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 degraded ward political heeler, whose ambition is to pander to the mob. 
 There are very few who dare go to the length of displeasing the mob, 
 but are ready to do as Talmage very crisply puts it : 
 
 " I have as much amusement as any man of my profession can 
 afford to indulge in at any one time, in seeing some of the clerical 
 " reformers " of this day mount their war-charger, dig in their spurs, 
 and with glittering lance dash down upon the iniquities of cities that 
 have been three or four thousand years dead. These men will corner 
 an old sinner of twenty or thirty centuries ago, and scalp him, and 
 hang him, and cut him to pieces, and then say : " Oh ! what great things 
 have been done." With amazingpiowess, they throw sulphur at Sodom, 
 and fire at Gomorrah, and worms at Herod, and pitch Jezebel over the 
 wall, but wipe off their gold spectacles, and put on their best kid gloves, 
 and unroll their morocco-covered sermon, and look bashful when they 
 begin to speak about the sins of our day, as though it were a shame 
 even to mention them. .The hypocrites! They are afraid of the 
 libertines and the men who drink too much, in their churches, and 
 those who grind the face ot the poor. Better, I say, clear out all our 
 audiences, from pulpit to storm-door, until no one is left but the sexton, 
 and he staying merely to lock up, than to have the pulpit afraid of the 
 pew. The time has come when the living Jadases and Herods and 
 Jezebels are to be arraigned. There is one thing I like about a big 
 church : a dozen people may get mad about the truth and go off, and 
 you don't know they are gone until about the next year ! The cities 
 standing on the ground are the cities to be reformed, and not the Her- 
 culaneums buried under volcanic ashes, or the cities of the plain fifty 
 feet under the Dead Sea." 
 
 Methodism in Nebraska has been agitated greatly by the trouble 
 in the church at Schuyler, a city of about 2,500 people in Colfax 
 county. The Rev. Henry C. Meyers, a graduate of the University of 
 the north-west, was sent to Schuyler a year ago against the protest of 
 some members, who wished their old paster to be returned. The mal- 
 contents proceeded to make trouble for the new pastor, but he proved 
 to be an eloquent and forcible speaker, and drew larger audiences than 
 the edifice would hold. A new church was built, but about a month 
 before the conference was held, his enemies re-enforced by a dozen 
 members who objected to the doctrine of no hell peacher by Mr. Meyers, 
 got up a petition asking that he be not returned for another year. 
 When the appointments were announced it was found that Mr. Meyers 
 had been transferred. This action of the Bishop caused more trouble 
 in the church, and appeals to the presiding elder and the Bishop were 
 made by his friends, but without avail. Mr. Meyers declared he would 
 not be transferred, and the Bishop sent his successor, armed with the 
 necessary legal papers. The new pastor took possession without em- 
 ploying any physical force. The deposed minister has begun the task 
 of building up a church of his own in Schuyler, and his first services,, 
 on Sunday, were largely attended. 
 
 His letter of declination to the presiding elder of the district has 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 183 
 
 just been made public, and the bitter tenor of it, as well as the charges 
 he makes against the " ecclesiastical bosses," as he calls the church 
 authorities, has created a sensation in the State. In this letter he gives 
 the following reasons for his action : 
 
 " First, I can no longer subject my thinking to the thoughts of a 
 few sectarian bosses who thought their thoughts a hundred years ago. 
 My motto is, Reason is the lamp in the light of which every man must 
 walk for himself. The world has outgrown the sectarian thinking of 
 the centuries past, and is now moving in the progressive light of rea- 
 son's lamp in the present day. The Dantean hell of the past — the pit 
 from which flames of fire and smoke ascended, mingled with the breath 
 of brimstone and the cries and groans of suffering spirits — is a hell no 
 longer reasonable to all thinking men and women of this age. To preach 
 men into hell who do not bow down to the creed of the church, a for- 
 mula, once possessing a measure of life, but now dead and decaying is 
 as unreasonable as the mind that pictured it. Who made the thinkers 
 of a hundred years ago infallible so that their thoughts possessed a 
 priori and unchangeable principles, and then left all future thinkers to 
 the fate of their human weakness ? Did God ? He did if the old doct- 
 rine be true. 
 
 " Is the cr«ed of the Methodist church an infallible rule ? If it is, 
 then all other rreeds are wrong, for it differs from all others. Methodism 
 teaches that there are Christians in most churches, but when men desire 
 to become members of the Methodist church they are rejected unkss 
 they believe what Methodism teaches ; from which the conclusion 
 inevitably follows, Chistianity is not Christianity unless it is labelled 
 Methodist. But, says the zealous but misguided advocate of church 
 creeds, Methodism numbers millions. Yes, so did the Roman Govern- 
 ment, but the Roman Empire played its last act and stepped off the 
 stage. Number does not prove infallibility. Truth is small and despi- 
 ses show, but moves quietly and unauspiciously forward to the conquest 
 of the world. 
 
 " Creeds must shake off their dead leaves before theit branches 
 can produce ripened fruit to save and bless the world. Churches, like 
 nations, must move in the direction of ultimate truth or die and decay 
 with the past. As water, standing still, stagnates and produces living 
 organism, so churches refusing to move forward, will die, and from their 
 effete body will rise a new organism instinct with the breath of a 
 broader and clearer light. Good is good no matter whether it is found 
 in character built by church creeds or built by a personal recognition 
 of duty and right with a faithful allegiance to the same. Men are not 
 all on their way to the bottomless pit who do not bow down to creeds 
 composed by a few claimers of infallibility. Is Abraham Lincoln in 
 the bottomless pit ? Where are the greatest men of this nation ? Was 
 Gen. Grant ever on record of the Methodist church ? Where are Clay, 
 Sumner, and Webster ? Tell me and I will be silent. 
 
 " My second reason for withdrawing is this : Methodism is cont- 
 rolled by a set of ecclesiastical bosses, and all under-graduates are their 
 
164 OP TORONTO THB GOOD. 
 
 tools. All ordinary preachers are instantly crushed to death unless 
 they salute the pope. All kinds of chicanery and infidelity are practised 
 by the leaders under the cloak of ecclesiastical and religious duty. The 
 church guillotine stands upon the platform at every conference, sharp- 
 ened and ready to decapitate every preacher who prostrates not him 
 self to the gods. Unless they become professional beggars they are 
 immediately relegated to the rear. The man of brains must seek his 
 field for himself, while the beggar rides his circuit gathering supplies 
 for bosses. Millions of dollars annually are collected and carried to 
 foreign fields to build up personal enterprises at the expenses of priv- 
 ation, suffering, and beggary in our home country. 
 
 " Where is the $20,000 ship bought and paid for by the American 
 people and placed in the waters of the Congo by Taylor for the purpose 
 of establishing trading posts ? What have been the results of $300,000 
 begged of the children and poor of this country and sent to Bulgaria ? 
 What of the millions sent to China ? * The Chairman,' said Dr. Max- 
 field of Omaha, in a speech made at Stanton, Neb., some years ago, 
 'will be a Chinaman no matter where he is, or what be the character 
 of his instruction.' This is doubtless true. But why send millions of 
 money needed by the poor and destitute of this country to China to 
 no purpose ? We answer : It is to keep missionary secretaries in lucra- 
 tive positions. To this end the popes of the church will crush out of 
 existence all preachers who do not endorse the movement. Book con- 
 cerns are run by this gigantic institution, and all preachers are required 
 to purchase their literature from them at enormous prices, so that the 
 Bishops can come and draw large salaries, ride in Pullman palace cars, 
 stop at costly hotels, and build fine mansions. All this comes from the 
 self-sacrificing preachers, who live for the most part upon from $200 to 
 $300 a year. Thousands of dollars passed out of Nebraska during the 
 hardest times ever seen to fields rendering large support to the bosses 
 of the church, while the citizens of Eastern States were appealed to 
 assist the needy to keep from starvation. 
 
 •' These are but a small number of the reasons I have for with- 
 drawing." 
 
 I ask your careful perusal of the foregoing as showing the means 
 church authorities are ready to employ to avenge themselves upon 
 those who adversely eriticise their acts, and as proving the absurdity 
 of Protestant claims to liberty of conscience. This man asserts there 
 is n'^ hell, and nine-tenths of the Protestants of the present day agree 
 with him but the Methodist authorities whose vagaries he denounced, 
 took good care to keep him out of the pale of the church, as soon as 
 he showed his independence. 
 
 Assuming that Christianity is founded upon the ten command- 
 ments, Christ's sermon on the Mount ; that St. Paul was inspired of God, 
 and that the bible is true, how many are there who are Christians 
 according to its definition there either clergy or laity ? There is not 
 five per cent on the continent of America, and I hold that the clergy 
 is entirely to blame for such a state of affairs. By whose authority does 
 
• OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 166 
 
 this man or that man preach a " liberal " Christianity, which will permit 
 his congregation to do almost anything so long as they keep within 
 the technicalities of laws made by man to shield rogues and swindlers ? 
 for I hold that the man who borrows from me or buys from me and 
 does not pay me, is nothing less than a swindler. 
 
 Is there a so-called Christian to-day who would think of obeying 
 the divine injunction which says "if thine enemy smite thee on one 
 cheek, turn thou the other " ? There is not one. A preacher will, doubt- 
 less tell you that it does not bear its literal interpretation, and letsome 
 one cross him, and he will demonstrate how little restraint his Christ- 
 ianity has over him in his frantic attempt to give the person who 
 opposes him a black eye. The passage I have referred to means what 
 it says or it means nothing. So do all the Scriptures. 
 
 What is the value ot Christianity anyway ? It does not appear to 
 elevate, refine or change those who profess it one iota. I have heard 
 ministers of the gospel use the vilest billingsgate in speaking, and if 
 anyone should show a good example surely it is they. 
 
 Hon. S. H. Blake recently aroused the ire of the Hamilton brethren 
 by some remarks of his, and the brethren retort in kind. At a meeting 
 of the Ministerial Association, Evangelist Moody and Hon. S. H. Blake 
 were severely rebuked for statements made at public meetings concern- 
 ing higher criticism. Rev. Dr. Burns said he was much annoyed at the 
 reflection made on the talent of preachers who occupy Hamilton pulpits. 
 Rev. Dr. Lyle said such ignoramuses should be severely censured. If 
 the Lord's work can prosper without the ignorant, the utterances of 
 Moody and Blake, he said, should be hissed down, as they indicated a 
 lack of charity and show " a wicked spirit and much ignorance. The 
 memories of higher critics will live when these wretched, sneering 
 pigmy critics are dead and forgotten." 
 
 Rev. Mr. McPherson said he could forgive Moody, on account of 
 his intense enthusiasm. Blake's remarks, however, were very insulting, 
 and Blake should be thoroughly ashamed of himself. 
 
 Rev. Mr. Gilmour advised the Association not to put itself on 
 record in the matter, and the discussion dropped. 
 
 Hon. S. H. Blake has also said the success of the Sunday car ad- 
 vocates was attributable to those clergymen who openly favoured Sun- 
 day afternoon bicycling and boating, and in a measure Sunday cars. 
 The Sabbath was being secularized by witty speeches on prohibition 
 and by the turning of churches into concert halls. Ministers attended 
 such lectures on Sunday afternoons instead of teaching in Bible classes 
 the importance of keeping holy the Sabbath day. 
 
 When the time came for the collection at Bond street Congreg- 
 ational church the new pastor, Rev. Morgan Wood, spoke out as follows : 
 •* The ushers will now pass amongst you and take up the collection. I 
 get awfully tired of making that announcement every Sunday, friends. 
 I have to ask you for money, but if everybody here would get into the 
 habit of dropping his money into a box at the door there would be no 
 occasion for this. But there is one thing I want to say. Everybody 
 here ought to put at least five cents in the plate. 
 
166 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. • 
 
 '• Ushers " he continued, addressing himself to the church officers. 
 •' I want to say something to you. Watch the people who don't put 
 any collection on the plate. Watch them, look good and hard at them, 
 shame them into it, and if they don't give they'll not come again, or if 
 they do, they'll bring their money with them next time." 
 
 Christianity, Christianity, thou hast much to answer for when such 
 things are done in thy holy name. 
 
 In another part of this article is a quotation from a paper which 
 says that clergymen all but called one another liars in Montreal and 
 Ottawa. 
 
 Listen to this from the Methodist conference : 
 
 The Rev. W. McDonagh did not propose to allow this conference 
 or any other body of men to gag him. 
 
 Here is another example of similar heroics: 
 
 The Rev. Mr. Willoughby was again on his feet in an instant He 
 would like to know who dared place what he called any obstacles in 
 the way of Manitoba. He was prepared to stand by that country let 
 the worst come to the worst, and he wanted a vote taken immediately 
 to show the world how they felt on the question. 
 
 I think the above is about what some hysterical old woman would 
 say. Yet I heard another Methodist divine speak against Mr. J. C. 
 Rykert in a style that would have gladdened the hearts of fish wives 
 all over the world. It might be called a disgrace to Christianity, only 
 Christianit)' is impervious to disgrace. 
 
 When Rev. Fulton came to this city to address audiences on the 
 Church of Rome, he referred to the mass as a roaring farce. And his 
 Christian audience applauded. 
 
 The committee which investigated the charges against the Rev. 
 Geo. Nesbit, of the Anglican church, Sutton, found that he was guilty 
 of opening letters of a parishioner, Miss Kathleen Osborne : also of 
 calling the lady an "infernal liar," and finally of having brought the 
 names of some of his parishioners into publicity in connection with 
 the case. A verdict of suspension for one year from his parish was 
 brought in against Mr. Nesbit. 
 
 Bishop Cameron, of Antigonish in speaking of some political 
 opponents one of whom was a devoted Catholic, called them " hell- 
 inspired hypocrites." 
 
 Personally, I admire the above references, which breathe the spirit 
 of educated ruffianism and ecclesiastical blackguardism, and I ask you 
 what there is in so-called Christianity more than a cloak to hide the 
 vilest traits of human character? Besides which it demonstrates what I 
 contend that clergymen who are presumed to teach us the way of the 
 gentle Savior are not any more fitted to do so than anyone else if we 
 may judge them by the intemperance of their language towards those 
 who are opposed to them. 
 
 During the progress of the Equal Rights bout in Ontario some 
 years ago, I confess my inability to understand the vindictive frenzy 
 that a large number of Protestant clergymen worked themselves into. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 167 
 
 but a residence in Montreal of over a year has completely opened my 
 eyes. First of all, the Jesuits, against whom their venom was principally 
 directed, are never obliged to annoup'-e in the press the sermons they 
 are to preach, nor the attractions they are to have, but their church is 
 always crowded to the doors. The reas ^n is therefore, perfectly clear. 
 Jealousy? Certainly not. Again, they have one of the finest colleges 
 in the world, which is attended by the flower of the French Canadian 
 youth, and I never wish to see a more manly-looking crowd of boys 
 than their pupils. The vigorous onslaughts made upon the Jesuits 
 appear to have injured them not at all. Their school is patronized as 
 it always has been, and that is only the logical outcome of events. The 
 people who send their sons there know the Jesuits. They know them 
 well, and what must be the feelings of those blatherskites who traduced 
 them when they found that after the expulsion of all their wind, their 
 enemies are still doing business in the old stand, untainted and serene 
 as ever, and their church crowded as it always has been. My only 
 surprise is now that there was not an immense influx into the Insane 
 asylums of Ontario, when the crowd of windbags found out " how vain 
 how inefi"ective their designs, while rage their leader and Jehovah 
 Mine," turned out their portion, and what their frenzy must have been, 
 and how little harm they had done. 
 
 During the past twenty years science and art have made most rapid 
 progress in their development, and politics have never been discussed 
 with greater energy than at the present day, so it is only reasonable, 
 therefore, that religion too, should have its progress in similar propor- 
 tion, and be discussed by the different religious teachers with acrimony 
 corresponding to the discussions of partisan politics. Besides compet- 
 ition in religion has become very keen of late years, and it behooves 
 the preaeher to ent r the field ready to give the moral value for the 
 money, an easy wa> to heaven, no restraint in morals, but a good show 
 to the world. 
 
 Early in 1878 or it may have been in 1 877, a Toronto paper published 
 as the opinion of a certain professor the following : " Religion is a great 
 political question, and will die the death cf all such questions, after 
 having served its purpose. It has held out longer on account of its 
 adherents, but it will end in just the same way as every other great 
 political question has ended." I wrote to the clergyman who read it 
 but he had forgotten what paper he saw it in but that is the pith of the 
 quotation, if not the exact language. 
 
 The speakers on this question are Doctors of Divinity in endless 
 profusion, scattered over the country, and as Max O'Reil says of the 
 title of Colonel in the United States, few escape it. Colleges are 
 abounding all over the country, spreading their nets to catch some 
 victim, to confer the meaningless title upon him, though the victims are 
 in most cases very willing ones. Few indeed escape it. 
 
 That Toronto has the ablest pulpit orators in the Dominion is 
 beyond question though that is not saying much, but that there are 
 any intellectual giants among them who, in theology, compare with the 
 
168 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Hon. Edward Blake in law is answered very decidedly in the negative. 
 Sensationalism has, however, provided a most excellent substitute, 
 though it cannot always be said to be a paying commodity. Take as 
 an example the Auditorium. It commenced under circumstances that 
 promised undoubted prosperity. Preaching on Simday night with an 
 orchestra to accompany the singing, and the modern Samson, who 
 could break a chain by placing it on his arm the rest of the week. If 
 as we are informed variety is t^e spice of life, then its success should 
 havt been assured. It is, however, beyond doubt that the methods 
 adopted by the pastor of the auditorium were not held in that profound 
 esteem which he thought they should have been. It is presumed that 
 in the c< urse of a sermon in the Queen street Methodist church on 
 questionable church attractions the Rev. Manly Benson had reference 
 to the auditorium and its manager. The latter gentleman on the follow- 
 ing Sunday replied — not so much to the arguments of Mr. Benson as to 
 the methods employed at the auditorium, but to abuse of Mr. Benson 
 personally. He started with an attack on Mr. Benson's name, and that 
 part of his sermon was interspersed with denunciatory language that 
 would have done credit to a fish-wife or even the disputants in a prize 
 fight. When the affairs of the concern became so far involved that it 
 was impossible to continue the " services" as they may be called, it was 
 closed, and Mr. Wilkinson left for the United States, in connection with 
 which the Globe says : 
 
 Rev. J. M. Wilkinson, well-known in Toronto as the pastor for some years of Agnes 
 street church and later on as an energetic, freehanded evangelistic worker, conducting success- 
 ful popular services in the tabernacle and elsewhere, received the permission of the Toronta 
 conference to remove to Illinois where he will settle. He has been preaching in Chicago, and 
 has met with such a measure of success there that he has concluded that his field of labour lies 
 there Mr. Wilkinson is a young man yet. an effective speaker, and an ardent workf. His 
 methods of work have not always been exactly like those of everybody else, a point Wiiich will 
 doubtless tell to his advantage m his new sphare of labour. 
 
 No cne would object to sensationalism to any very great extent, 
 if ability were behind it, or any good cause were served by it but there 
 is none, A worthy Presbyterian preacher some time ago gave vent ta 
 some pyrotechnic sensationalism in regard to Aldermen. In the course 
 of his remarks he struck out from the shoulder as a local paper put it, 
 at these who made that their psofession, but toned himself down 
 towards the end by remarking that his strictures did not, of course 
 apply to Toronto. The average reader will doubtles wonder why, then 
 he delivered the sermon. His strictures no doubt were meant to apply 
 to the Chinese or some other Asiatic race, and yet it was subsequently 
 proven that Toronto Aldermen were guilty cf boodling. 
 
 Mcii who are so ready to treat of sensational .subjects, demonstrate 
 their insincerity when they allow their own adherents to do just as 
 they please in keeping or breaking the rules of the churches, or com- 
 mitting acta of absolute dishonesty. 
 
 It is not for the spiritual profit of the Methodist church that its 
 business enterprises should give credit to clergymen who have to be 
 dunned in public for the amount of their indebtedness to a denomin- 
 ational concern. It is rough on a Book Room, when ministers who 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 169 
 
 cannot, or will not, pay up get far in upon the debit side of its ledger. 
 It is rough on Methodism in the Hamilton Conference at least, when 
 a representative ot the Book Room rises to reproach the debtors of that 
 institution in words which the worldtng will construe as an intimation 
 that all ministers are dead beats. Refusing credit or collecting debts 
 by a process of law might be a hard measure, but saddling a whole 
 class with the liabilities of individuals is not an admirable method of 
 collecting debts. 
 
 When clergymen are so lax in enforcing their church discipline, 
 and so tardy in paying their debts, but eager to rush into print or 
 preach sermons that will bring them into notoriety, I think the time is 
 not far distant when a discriminating public will conclude that modern 
 Christianity is a thing they can live quite pleasantly without, on the 
 hypothesis that their spiritual advisers aie not any better then they are 
 themselves nor are some of them quite as %ood. 
 
 If opera, tragedy and comedy have their seasons of special favour, 
 and politics its heated discussions, so too leligion has its changes and 
 varieties in similar commcnsuration, and the public have their desires 
 fulfilled and their requirements gratified just as the theatre-goer has 
 his, for the preacher's popularity like that of the theatrical manager or 
 politician is gauged by his ability to keep in touch with the people. 
 
 Circumstances not unfrequently occur where opportunities are given 
 for a display of pyrotechnics, and they are always seized upon with 
 avidity by the preachers who wish to make any comments upon them, 
 being duly advertised in the daily papers. As an example take the 
 han ,ig of that consummate blackguard Birchall. A man may be hanged 
 for murder, and if he quietly submits to it, he is not likely to receive 
 much attention from the preachers, but as this most infamous blackleg 
 who had not a redeeming feature in nil his filthy character managed 
 to keep himself prominently before the public, his execution was seized 
 upon by different preachers to attract the crowd to their respective 
 churches, and in reviewing the matter Saturday Night very clearly 
 echoes the general feeling of the public on the subject : 
 
 And the parsons, too ! Of course it is perfectly proper that they should preach on cur- 
 rent topics, but there is a tendency to sensationalism amongst them, and we always expect Rev. 
 Dr. Wild to have his say when anything is being said. He and Rev. Dr. Stafford Doth preached 
 from the text, "Thou shalt not kill," both aiming at the same conclusion, that capital punish* 
 ment should be abolished, though they took different methods to prove the same thing. Both 
 were apparently brought to this conclusion by the educated and interesting nature of the victim> 
 the death of so many common murderers having been passed over unnoticed. As usual Dr. 
 Wild's sermon was as much evolved from the encyclopaedia as from the bible. AAer pointing 
 out that capital punishment was a relic of barbarism a fragment of the old doctrine of revenge, 
 he showed that besides murder there were eleven other kinds of crime that were punishable 
 with death under the Mosaic dispensation : lirst, striking a parent ; second, blasphemy ; third. 
 Sabbath breaking ; fourth, with craft ; fifth, adultery ; sixth, unchastity ; seventh, rape ; 
 eighth, incestuousness ; ninth, man-slaying ; tenth, idolatry; elevent*^, false swearing, addmg, 
 " now it is a remarkable thing that those who plead for capital punishment never bring forward 
 these and argue that they should be enforced now ; thf y bring forward that if a man kills another 
 capital punishment should take place because it is written in the bock of Moses." 
 
 Dr. Wild is evidently of the opinion that the Mosaic law is not law to-day. I do not 
 remember what his views on the observance •>{ the sabbath are, but I am glad he has pointed 
 out to the modern Sabbatarian that if we are to follow out the Mosaic law in this respect we 
 must put to death those who disobey the IMosaic law something which, by the way, it is imposs- 
 ible for us to observe in this age and under conditions such as we are surrounded by in this 
 
170. OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 climate and country. I'ossibly he holds that the same modification of the law should be made 
 in respect to Sabbath observance as to murder, that imprisonment for life would be sufficiently 
 severe for those who ligh afire on Sunday or journey beyond the specified number of miles. 
 As a matjer of fact capital punishment is not retained out of respect for Moses any more than 
 is Sunday insisted upon ..s a day of rest, because the Great Law Giver made it a portion of his 
 regulations, rts a gentleman whom I regard as one of the brainiest members of the Methodist 
 body either lay or clerical in this pre vince, remarked to nie, " Sunday should be kept, not 
 because Moses kept it, but because it is an economic necessity," I think we hang people for 
 the same reason, not because Moses did it but because we want to get rid of that sort of people. 
 It is cheaper and safer, and altogether more reasonsble to put them to death than to imprison 
 them for life. Of course as Dr. Wild and Dr. Stafford point out, there is a possibility of con- 
 verting them, but there are so many decent people now who don't need converting in that way, 
 who are left without e/en prison fare and never have the ministration of a preacher volunteered 
 to them, that I think we ought to take care of them first, and after we get so far advanced that 
 we have no decent people dying for want of simple prison provender then we may take up the 
 problem of making over the murderously bad ones. Until that time comes, if Drs. Wild and 
 Stafford would devote a portion of their energies to caring for honest people who are foolish 
 enough to permit their only crime to be poverty, and have failed to become enterprising enough 
 to be murderers the progress of civilization will not be stayed by the occasional necktie social 
 which sends up to the Supreme Court of the Universe some human malformation in the shape 
 of a murderer. 
 
 The great trouble with these preachers and many scientists is they want to de.'il with 
 freaks all the time ignoring the great mass of uninteresting, but human atoms who live and die 
 without so much as the gentle touch of a missionary's gloved hand. Why should wc fret over 
 the freaks ? Why should the church especially make its doctrines apply t3 the exhibits of a 
 dime museum of nature instead of the great surging, sorrowing mass who go into the world and 
 go out of it without any recognition but kicks and nunger ? Why should we care for the lives 
 of a few cowardly assasj'ins whom the world is never safe from until the hangman has had them, 
 while gentle women weep and babies cry because they hav» not been fed, and men gnash their 
 teeth because, without having sinned against the law, .or been guilty of any greater crime than 
 being born, they arc undergoing a life sentence of hnmiliation and hunger in the dark cell of 
 social oblivion .' It seems to prove that human sin and sufl'ering must be thrust in the eyes and 
 the stench of human wrong-doing heJd under the nostrils of the.se leaders of religious thought 
 before they can be made to recognize the existence of anyone but the well-dressed and well-fed 
 parishioners who fill their pews. Death ! Why should death frighten these persons ? fclvery 
 day in this land of ours the sentence of death is being imposed upon some innocent child, over- 
 worked mother, and unfortunate father. Death ! Unmerited death ! Death after an imprison- 
 ment for life, death after vain struggles to live, death after fruitless appeals to God and his 
 people I Have not all seen it, perhaps helped to infUcit it ? Our clerical friends could not be 
 silent a moment or rest an instant from their labour and if they felt half as badly about the 
 death of a fellow-being as they would have us believe. Death ! Why, this earth is carnival of 
 death. Civilization ! Why. it is but another name for the refinement of cruelty in the infliction 
 of death. Death ! Was it not the sentence imposed upon mankind for the sin of our first father 
 and mother, imposed upon us before we were born, a sentence which will be inflicted on man- 
 kind after we are dead ? I can't see why it should so greatly horrify Brother Wild, or unduly 
 excite the eloquence of Brother Stafford. 
 
 We remember how, when the Equal Rights Crusade was at its 
 zenith .sensationalism was the only accepted form of service that could 
 attract the multitude, and receive any kind of recognition from the 
 press. How many preachers are there in the whole Dominion who 
 have awakened to find themselves famous, surprised beyond expression 
 at the ability they possessed, but never suspected, when this ability 
 was appraised by that portion of the press which could always find space 
 for the snarls of reverend nobodies, suffering from periodical attacks 
 of the spleen or vapours, measuring the universe by that narrow scrap 
 of tape which was the span or their own littleness, and who would never 
 have been heard of did these journals not publish their articles. The 
 airy castles they built of future glory are nothing but the ashes they 
 are sitting in to-day. The rotten foundations of human vanity which 
 the prophet assures us are only shortlived at best, and upon which their 
 hopes were built have crumbled to the dust —the would-be-sensationalist 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 171 
 
 is far and away beyond oblivion. This seems especially sad, since we 
 had the outside assistance of professional haters of Rome, escaped nuns 
 etc., to assist us in the good work. We remember with profound thank- 
 fulness of the privileges we enjoyed in listening to these grand and 
 ennobling declamations and recitations from lives of sensual filth written 
 by saintly men and women for the moral and spiritual welfare of man- 
 kind, and with no thought of profit to themselves. We remember their 
 righteous indignation with the press of the city in not publishing these 
 stories, and assisting in the propogation of the good work, and the 
 justice of the aspersions they cast upon the press for such neglect of 
 duty we acknowledge to have been well-merited. 
 
 It is stated that when Corinne and her merry makers visit the 
 Toronto Opera house, it is almost impossible to obtain seats, and should 
 anyone by mischance go late he is obliged to take whatever seat he 
 can get, and in fact be very thankful if he can get a seat at all. The 
 reason of this is that thi sugg^stiveness of the play and actors are the 
 secret of its popularity. It, therefore, behooved the Ministry in its fore- 
 thought and wisdom to provide an entertainment equally attractive, 
 and they did so. It will not be doubted, I think, that if the divine 
 Son of God were to make his second coming, he would be surprised and 
 perhaps overwhelmed with the marvellous progress made in Christianity 
 during the past few years. It is equally certain that he would find that 
 those preachers who are supposed to emulate him, would prove that in 
 depth of learning, and theology and the construction of his texts they 
 were far and away ahead of Him, though the word came through his 
 inspiration, remembering at the same time that any question of miser- 
 able sinners on the question of the Great Perhaps is a matter too 
 commonplace to receive the consideration of those eminent Doctors of 
 Divinity, who, like the poor, are always with us, and whose almost 
 supernal ability it would be absurd to question. Perhaps, too, he would 
 fetil somewhat abashed and believe that he was not in the running, 
 when brought face to face with the sesquipedalian language and elegance 
 of diction employed by the present day preacher in accordance with 
 the popular demand. Comparing the new testament with the modern 
 day requirements I do not think anyone will for one moment contend, 
 that as a literarj' effort it is anything to the expressive slang we use in 
 the present day. Like the air we breathe slang is absolutely necessary 
 to our very existence. The man who has no fear of doing so, goes to 
 the opera house to hear and see what he expects to see, but the alleged 
 Christian who is afraid of being boycotted, is compelled to look to the 
 pulpit for such a treat. In order to meet the spiritual needs of his con- 
 gregation a certain Reverend gentleman made visits to certain houses 
 of ill-fame in an American city, and entertained his hearers with a 
 delectable account of his experience. Besides this he has given us a 
 further exhibition of his prowess in this choice and touching language : 
 " If you or I have any wish to be a little Redeemer." " I can under- 
 stand some of the angels not in the redemption business loafing along 
 the celestial courts." " Christ has taken out the only patent method 
 of saving the world." 
 
172 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Verily the church of God must have fallen to singular depths. 
 
 Toronto has not yet been favoured with a visit from this distin- 
 guished gentleman, but it is merely a question of time when she will be, 
 though thus far we have been satisfied with Sam Jones, who has been 
 able to satisfy our requirements, and meet our refined tastes with the 
 most delectable paraphrasing. You will, doubtless remember that we 
 had him and Sam Small here in company, and you will remember that 
 we, like humanity in general, satisfied our cultured curiosity by giving 
 him a reception that would have gratified the ablest statesman who 
 ever lived, after the completion of some important diplomatic triumph. 
 It is not, I think, contended by those who brought him here that they 
 did so on account of his ability as a teacher of the word of God. His 
 vnlgarity, which passed for wit ; his slangy style of oratory and the 
 delightfully familiar manner in which he spoke to and of the Son Oi" 
 God and God himself, and which gave him a continental notoriety were 
 his drawing cards, and as he fed the popular demand for sensationalism 
 and vulgar slang it cannot be said that he did not earn his money. 
 Those who could have gone to a low theatre and heard no worse than 
 this could feel consistently that their senses were being gratified and no 
 rule of the church was being broken. He, too, must have felt gratified 
 at our open-armed reception and the sycophantic constancy with which 
 we received and applauded his defiling remarks. In speaking of him 
 a newspaper says : 
 
 He had been hired to deliver a series of sermons at the Urbana Camp meeting. The 
 secular press freely denounces the management as being more solicitous for the almighty dollar 
 than the salvation of souls. When it was proposed to raise the pride of admission to the grounds, 
 there was a vigorous protest, which was met by the " Rev," Sam in the following stirring pulpit 
 expostulation : 
 
 " You stiney old devil, you talk of going to heaven Why, you old dog, you are too 
 stingy to get into heaven. You kicked because you thought you had to pay an extra five cents 
 to get into the erounds. I just like to catch an old dog like you and hold him out by the collar 
 and let him kick himself to death." 
 
 At another time, when evidences of an unchristian rebellion were manifest, he became 
 equally eloquent : 
 
 "A dude," he said, "talks about killing me ; why I would just spit on him and drown him." 
 
 Refreshing is it not ? 
 
 I was privileged some few years ago to hear him " preach " at 
 Grimsby Park. He seems to nurse a grievance against Colonel Ingersoll, 
 whom he accused of using most disgraceful profanity in a Railway 
 sleeper where both had passed the night. In a burst of grandeur of soul 
 he exclaimed " I wouldn't let my dog speak to him, I wouldn't speak 
 to him myself." It will be inferred therefore, that Mr. Jones has a dog 
 which speaks, but his announcement of the fact that he would not speak 
 to Colonel Ingersoll himself, suggests the idea that the Prince of Wales 
 for instance, would scarce get over the heartburning that might be caused 
 if some sweep were to announce that he would not speak to him. I 
 understand, though, that notwithstanding Mr. Jones terrible determin- 
 ation not to speak to him, Mr. Ingersoll still breathes. In the course of 
 his observations, Mr. Jones was demonstiating God's love, and he took 
 himself as a living example, '• when I go home, and my dog runs to 
 meet me. I pat him and I say ' what makes you love me so } ' and he 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 173 
 
 says ' because you so good to me/ and when I go to my horse and feed 
 him and ask him ' what makes you love me so ? ' he says, ' because 
 you're so good to me.' " 
 
 I think that is sublime. A horse that speaks and a dog that speaks. 
 
 Still in these days of democracy it may safely be inferred that 
 Providence in the se'riction of his preachers is as lenient as humanity 
 in the selection of gentlemen, though it may be thought that heaven is 
 not very particular who is now preaching for it. I think if pharisees 
 abounded in these days, one might very consistantly say that when 
 such characters are the chosen of the Lord, he stands a good chance of 
 entering the pearly gates on the plea that heaven is not such a desirable 
 place after all, when the characters of its advocates are taken into 
 consideration. 
 
 Like all businesses, religion has its fakirs, and a thriving trade is done 
 by some of them. One sect pretends to cure all diseases by faith, but 
 their faith is not shaken by the death of their patients. " If they had 
 had more faith they would have recovered." A celebrated physician 
 cured all illnesses by bleedings and hot water. When a patient died it 
 was because he had not been bled copiously enough or too copious, and 
 the water administered too hot or not hot enough ! The theory remained 
 excellent. In the faith cure fa!:e the proselytes are appealed to for 
 funds to found what is called the •' Lord's Treasury." When one of 
 the Christian Scientists came to our city, the ungrateful press took no 
 notice of his coming, whereupon some one, I don't know who under- 
 took to lecture them in the Advance, in the following language, though 
 I might say, inferentially, that a few lessons in writing and spelling 
 would do him no harm, if he proposes inflicting any more of it on the 
 long-suffering compositor : 
 
 His advent to T ironto is worthy of note, for after a lengthy sojourn in Australia, he has 
 created a stir in the United States, and the silence of the Toronto press, silence, which from a 
 journalistic standpoint is extremely silly — makes it imperative that such papers as the Advance 
 should do this work. I attended the meetings as a skeptic, having no sympathy with what I 
 considered a fantastic interpretation of scripture, supported by fancied or fanciful cures of some 
 weak-minded men and hysterical women. I went to scoff. I {(remained i to the prayer meeting, 
 because I was anxious to hear the whole matter. 
 
 His accent is Scotch, he is an Edinboro man, his style of (Speaking ' ts very direct — too 
 blunt for some super-sensitive ears. He calls tobacco smokers " nasty stink-pots " he speaks 
 of Job's affliction as " the vile stinking boils that came from the devil's dirty fingers." 
 
 Our Saviour would undoubtedly have been more than pleased at 
 this refreshing style of speaking supposed to be delivered in his name. 
 
 This is a sample of their cures : 
 
 At Arger's Hotel Coroner Orr conducted an inquest into the cause 
 of death of a six-year-old lad named Percy Robert Beck, who died while 
 under treatment by a Christian Scientist. Crown Attorney Dewart 
 examined the witnesses. Mrs. Beck, mother of the lad, said he took 
 Sick about three weeks before. Mrs. Beer, who had attended him three 
 times before, was sent for. Her treatment was mental, no medicines 
 being used. The Scientists claimed God sent sickness as a punishment 
 for sin, and people merely believed they wer^sick ; the truth did every- 
 thing. Mrs. Beer said to deceased : " Percy Beck, you have no illness, 
 
174 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 you ire a child of God, and cannot be sick." Percy became worse and 
 Mrs. Beer treated him by sitting silently beside him. She charged one 
 dollar for each treatment. Thomas Beck, the lad's father, corroborated 
 his wife's statement, and said he had more faith in the Christian 
 Scientists than he had in doctors. Two brothers of deceased said they 
 also were treated in the same way. 
 
 When some years ago, the secular society had the effrontery to 
 speak of bringing Colonel Igersoll here, holy Toronto held up its hands 
 in anguish at the idea. A gentleman whose eloquence, high moral 
 character and brilliant intellect have won for him a reputation wherever 
 the English language is spoken, was not fit to speak in this saintly city ; 
 yet the Colonel came and lectured, and the house was packed to the 
 doors, yet in his entire lecture there was not the first sign of coarseness 
 or vulgarity ; it was a most elegant elucidation of what the lecturer 
 believed to be true. Max O'Rell who enjoyed his hospitality when in 
 New York in addition to many other pleasant things has the following : 
 
 Mr. Ingersoll js not only America's greatest living orator, he is a great writer and 
 thinker ; the trinity that he worships is the trinity cf science, observation and experience. I 
 never heard Mr. Ingersoll say that he did not believe in a God. He will not acknowledge the 
 existence of a Jehovah, the God of the Jews, a God who commanded the people of his choice 
 to exterminate their enemies sparing neither old men, women nor children. Mr. Ingersoll is 
 not the only seeker after truth who has been puzzled to reconcile the idea of the gentle merciful 
 saviour who taught the doctrine of love and forgiveness in Palestine, and bade his disciples put 
 up their swords in the presence of their persecutors, and the idea of this crnel, revengeful, and 
 implacable deity. '* I rob Smith " exclaims Mr. Ingersoll in the ironical language he is such a 
 master of, "God forgives me. How does that help Smith .'" That which makes this man so 
 formidable is not so much his eloquence, his quick repartee, his sarcasm, his pathos, his humor, 
 it is above all things the life he leads, the example he sets of all the domestic virtues. One must 
 have the privilege of knowing him intimately, of penetrating into that sanctuary of conjugal 
 happiness, his home.^before one can form an idea of the respect that he must inspire even in 
 those who abhor his doctrines. His house is the home of the purest joys ; it holds four hearts 
 that beat as one. Authors, artists, Journalists, members of the thinking world may be met at 
 the Colonel's charming Sunday evenmgs. Between midnight and one in the morning the last 
 visitor reluctactly departs. On the way home you think of all the witty things that have been 
 said the arrows •{ satire that have been shot at hypocrisy and humbug, the ennobling humani- 
 tarian opinions that have been advanced ; and though you may not be converted, or converted 
 or perverted to Ingersollism, you are sure to leave that house feeling fuller of good will toward 
 all men, and saying yourself: " What a delightful evening I have passed." 
 
 Now, the lot of Colonel Ingersoll in this world is very enviable, for his profession brings 
 him in a magnificent income. As to refusing his place in the next, what an absurdity. 
 
 When Robert Ingersoll presents himself at the pearly gates of Paradise, St. Peter sees 
 that good, open face, radiant with happiness, the doors will be thrown wide to let him pass, and 
 the saint will say : 
 
 " Come Robert, come in, thy happy face pleases me. We have just let in a cargo of 
 long-faced folk — Presbyterians I'll be bound and it docs one good^to look at thee. Thou hast 
 done they utmost to stifle the hydra headed monster superstition, and to destroy the infamies that 
 are in circulation on the subject of the Lord. Come in, friend, thou hast loved, thou has been 
 beloved, thou hast preached concord, mercy, peace love, and happiness ; come, take thy place 
 among the benefactors of the human race.' 
 
 This is the opinion expressed by one of the ablest writers of the 
 day. A gentleman, who, to him, was an entire stranger yet when that 
 same gentleman was invited to visit us as a brilliant orator the Chris- 
 tian people declared unanimously that he should not come and why ? 
 Fear, doubtless that he would show their Pharisacial actions up and 
 they would lose the little prestige they now possess. And yet a Chris- 
 tian will complacently inform you that his religion is unassailable. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 175 
 
 I give you also. the following, and do not think I am at all astray 
 in stating that the notice was given by one of the society and furnished 
 to all the city newspapers. 
 
 The West Presbyterian church Band of Hope held their regular meeting on Thursday 
 evening and there was an attendance above the average. The behaviour was all that could be 
 desired. One parent brought two of her children, and another sent two, and so the quiet work 
 goes on. The superintendents were in their places and the children were addressed by Mr. 
 George Wilson 
 
 You will notice that we are informed that the quiet work goes on, 
 yet I feel constrained to say that if it is quiet, it is not[from any feeling 
 of modesty on the part of the officers or promoters, but is purely and 
 simply the gross negligence of the press in not giving it publicity. 
 
 It would indeed be an unanswerable enigma to ask what would 
 the preachers do without the press. Consult any of the Toronto papers, 
 and particularly the Mail, and you will see that quite half the corres- 
 pondence is from preachers of the different denominations, answering 
 some contemporary, denouncing some adversary, or giving vent to their 
 views on some of the political questions of the day, or criticising the 
 work or sermon of a brother minister. 
 
 Let the thoughtful reader reflect for one moment, and ask himself 
 if it were not for the notoriety given them by the press, how many 
 preachtrs would there be who would be accused of heresy and other 
 similar offences that injures no one, but simply serves the purpose of 
 bringing themselves before the public, and in a lesser degree their 
 accusers } I do not think there would be one where now there is a 
 hundred. As an example take the case of the Rev. Dr. Briggs, his 
 trials before the different synods and assemblies in the different parts 
 of the United States, and what do they all amount to ? Simply to let 
 a lot of men air their opinions, and have them published in the press 
 throughout the country, and the very remote contingency of a new 
 religion, belief, faith or whatever you chose to call it, being inflicted on 
 long-suffering humanity. Do you think that the charge of heresy brought 
 against this preacher and that preacher is anything more than mere 
 excuses for newspaper notoriety "* If you do think otherwise your abiliy 
 to read human character must be very limited indeed. 
 
 If clergymen are actuated by motives Christlike, why was it ne- 
 cessary for the Rev. Dr. Carman of Belleville to rush into print when 
 it so happened that he was not asked to say grace at a banquet given 
 in Belleville in honor of Sir Mackenzie Bowell ? Would it not have 
 been far more dignified, without saying Christlike to have allowed the 
 matter to pass in silence ? It is quite within the range of recollection of 
 many people that during the time the Toronto Mail was the champion 
 of Protestant rights, the Rev. Dr. Carman was in the habit of writing 
 long letters to that journal taken from some scriptural text. How do 
 those letters compare with the letter he wrote to the Belleville Ontario 
 V 'ith regard to his position at the Bowell banquet } In striking contrast 
 to his position appears that of the Catholic priest who was invited to 
 perform the ceremony of saying grace. Mr. Thomas Ritchie explains 
 the whole matter in a letter to the Intelligencer. He accepts the entire 
 
176 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 responsibility for having requested Mgr. Farrel to say grace, and adds 
 that the latter at the time asked to be excused on the ground that such 
 action might create bad feeling. Mgr. Farrel desired that no bad feeling 
 should be created. What construction could be put upon Dr. Carman's 
 attitude except that he desired to create bad feeling, and whose con- 
 duct was the more gentlemanly, without going so far as to say Christlike ? 
 The Telegram quite satirically observes of another preacher .♦ 
 
 Rev. John Burwash who is upholding Coercion by his presence on platforms and his 
 utterances in print, expresses opinions which would lie entirely unimportant if their author did 
 not wear a name adorned by tbe rare powers of his brother, Rev. N. Burwash, Chancellor of 
 Victoria U iiiversity. 
 
 It giving these delineations of clerical characteristics and my ad- 
 verse comments on their actions, I consider it my right to affirm that 
 if clergymen are actuated by no higher motives than newspaper noto- 
 riety, they do far more to advance the theories and the march of infi- 
 delity than a dozen men like Col. IngersoU would do. It is a clergy- 
 man's place to command respect and by example prove ♦^hat he really 
 believes in a loving Savior. If they indicate by their actions that their 
 minds have no higher plane than those they are presumed to teach, I 
 contend that their usefulness is gone. There is no class of men who 
 are more ready to rush into print than they, and I hold that when they 
 do so they do .so with a loss of the respect their cloth should entitle 
 them to. The frequency of church rows demonstrates my contention 
 that clergymen do not receive, nor merit the respect that clergymen in 
 former times received, and that the fault is entirely their own I have 
 tried to prove by my criticisms. 
 
 Years ago when I was attending school, I recollect a young lad of 
 about ten coining into school one morning flushed with importance and 
 swaggering like a triumphant general. 
 
 " Did you see my name in the paper last night ? " he asked, proudly 
 and as no one answered, we held our breath while he read : " ' A young 
 lad by name of John Jones was almost run over last night by Bing- 
 ham's express wagon, etc. ' " 
 
 Nothing could exceed the pride with which he read i.the blood 
 curdling announcement, and whenever I see eccentricities on the part 
 of clergymen and others, which are reported in the newspapers I think 
 of little Johnny Jones and his name in the paper. 
 
 Some time ago when I was employed on a city paper the pastor 
 of what was then called, and the present pastor still calls St. Paul's 
 Methodist Church, in preparing his advertisement of the Sunday ser- 
 vices, invariably called the church Avenue Road Methodist Church, 
 To the evil minded it might occur that he styled his church the Avenue 
 Road, simply to get it placed at the head of the list of churches, pos- 
 sibly thereby implying its importance, or it might be that a church on 
 that aristocratic thoroughfare would be considered a more fashionable ' 
 temple in which to worship than common every day St. Paul's. I express 
 no opinion on the matter myself ; but call your attention to an obser- 
 vation reported in the Mail and Empire as having been made by this 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 177 
 
 gentleman : " Imagine Jesus Christ standing on the street corners with 
 a cigar or a cigarette in his mouth etc." In view'of these matters does 
 anyone presume that so distinguished a clergyman was simply seeking 
 notoriety ? By no means, nor could any reasonable being presume that 
 his remarks concerning Christ were in any respect blasphemous, because 
 they were not. Still, what were they ? 
 
 At a meeting of the preachers some little time ago,'a rev. gentle- 
 man passed some observations in regard to the hymn " God Save the 
 Queen," implying that it would not be required much longer. He was 
 not immortalized, however, for his breach of good taste, and when he 
 sought fame as a school trustee, unsuccessfully, the ignorant, not to say. 
 brutal instincts of the electors, leading them to support men who com- 
 pletely snowed him under. I think this case is especially sad. 
 
 A couple of years ago the Industrial Exhibition Association, 
 according to its usual custom I believe, sent passes to a Baptist clergy- 
 man amongst others, which the rev. gentleman returned to the Presi- 
 dent of the Association. No one need complain of that, but why was 
 it necessary for him to rush into print and electrify the world with the 
 announcement that he had returned the passes in order that he might 
 have the ri^rht to criticise the show ? Some people not endowed with 
 Christian charity might insist that the rev. gentleman informed the 
 public of his sacrifice merely for the sake of the notoriety it would give 
 him. If that view prevails, it ceitainly has not had any tangible result 
 as far as I can see, for he is still with us, but it is not, of course, by any 
 means certain that he was actuated by any such motive. 
 
 Lately I have noticed that the heretics are not so plentiful as they 
 were a few years ago, but I notice that quite a few clergymen are being 
 advertised by the patent medicine dealers, and this may have the effect 
 of reducing the number who might otherwise have sought immortality 
 through heresy. 
 
 It must be that ministers rub up so little against the world that 
 contradiction maddens them, and when in Presbytery or Synod they 
 are contradicted by each other the polished violence of their language 
 is startling. There was some excuse for the fathers and brethren who 
 practically called each other liars over an^issue important as that tried 
 in the Synod of Ottawa and Montreal. But the language even there 
 was unnecessarily warm, and there were too many accusations of dou- 
 ble-dealing to make the debate altogether edifying. And our own 
 Synod of Toronto and Kingston with less provocation, displayed its 
 power to embitter controversy. There was nothing worth wrangling 
 about there, nothing that should have raised any voice above a whisper, 
 but Kev. Dr. Parsons managed to speak of some one "having the im- 
 pudence " to do thus and so and other reverend gentlemen used 
 language that would have been followed by a reprimand in the secular 
 court, or a call to order from the Speaker of a profane Parliament. 
 
 The heresy scheme has reach«:d that point in his history as to be- 
 come a subject for ridicnle, and will be simply laughed out of court, as 
 witness the following from the Telegram : 
 
178 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 THE J. HUSS WAS ABSENT. 
 
 A well-meant and earnest effort to start a heresy trial in Montreal collapsed, at least 
 temporarily, in its first stages, owing to the absence of the heretic. 
 
 Kverything else was in a state of advanced readiness. The intellectual fagots had been 
 cut, and were being dried. The enquirer or inquisitors were prepared to mentally rack the 
 author of " The Perfect Father or the Perfect Word." 
 
 But the '' intellectual treat " had to be postponed. There was no use for stake or fagot, 
 because there was no John Huss on the scene. The learned professor who was to be the John 
 Huss of the occasion was away fishing in Muskoka, and was Jnot, therefore, to be tried or 
 tortured by his brethren. 
 
 It was not thus in other days, when all-powerful!orthodoxy decided to investigate a heretic. 
 The heretic was there to be investigated if he had to be carried. The fiery trial of John Huss 
 was not adjourned owing to the absence of the heretic and the brethren in Montreal will do well 
 next time to make sure that they have their heretic before they attempt to try him. 
 
 We listen to the melody of "Onward Chjistian Soldiers," and enjoy 
 the harmonious music as well as the sentiment it expresses, and sub- 
 scribe with at a murmur to the truthfulness of those sublime lines 
 which state : 
 
 We are all united, all one body we, 
 One in faith and doctrine one in charity. 
 I have only to ask your indulgence for a moment to demonstrate the 
 truthfulness of this assertion. The Rev. Dr. Workman says, in reply 
 an editorial on his view of Messiahism by the editor of the Christian 
 Guardian : 
 
 As the editor of the Christian Guardian h»s been most bitter and persistant in his attack 
 upon my teaching, I shall first reply to his unmerited and ill-natured strictures. * * In my 
 prompt reply to bis misleading editorial which, besides the characteristics already indicated, 
 contamed two or three serious quotations that the editor never acknowledged. * * One of my 
 correspondents writes me " Reading Dr. B.'s criticism I felt compelled to accept his logic, until, 
 carefully perusing your reply, I saw that his premises were wrong, that he misunderstands and 
 mis-states your view " 'Ho\Mi'\i!t&\.tx\^\n%\\\i repeated misrepresentation of my teaching he was 
 publicly reported in a recent interview as saying, " I put no special meaning on his words. I do 
 not even interpret them. I simply assume that in writing plain English sentences he meant what 
 he said." As the editor has made this statement in substantially the same terms two or three 
 times since his first attack was published, I am prepared to prove by overwelming evidence that 
 it is absolutely false to the fact of the case. * * That is to say, in every criticism he makes: either 
 his statements or his assumption, or his suggestion or his implication respecting me or my work 
 are untrue. In other words he sets up a man of straw and then as systematically knocks him 
 down again. 
 
 If anyone doubts after reading this that "we are not united, all one 
 body we, one in faith and charity, etc.," he is simply an idiot. 
 
 The quarrels of the churches and the preachers are without number, 
 like the sands of the sea, and recently the Telegram published the 
 following editorial on the subject of church rows : 
 
 A LESSON FOR THE TROUBLERS OF ZION. 
 
 A good answer was that returned by the Salvation Army officer when asked his reason 
 for quitting an organization which he had faithfully served. 
 
 It was clear that he had been aggrieved, and the power to say much if he liked rendered 
 all the more honourable in him to declare that " for the good of the work it was best tu say 
 nothing." It almost always is best to say nothing. Parties to churches troubles are too seldom 
 true to the faith as that ex- Salvationist, who is content to let the God whom he has tried to 
 serve judge between him and his adversaries. Virtues which adorn all churches in times of 
 peace are not exactly resplendent in the walk and conversation of church members in times of 
 troubles. Too often all hands are so anxious to stand well in the sight of the world that they 
 woand the cause in the effort to give brethren on the other side a black eye. There will be a 
 good deal of unregenerate human nature when the millenium ts nearer than it is now, and the 
 worst qualities of our fallen humanity are too widely prevalent in every church row. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. lt» 
 
 And yet how inscrutable and mysterious seem the decrees of a 
 divine Providence. 
 
 Mrs. Margaret L. Shepherd, whose anti-Romanist lecturing tour 
 lias been such a complete failure in liberal Ontario, has decided, accord- 
 ing to the Toronto News, to abandon the lecture platform and take to 
 the dramatic stage. The experience of several men who have lectured 
 throughout Ontario should have bepn enough to have deterred her from 
 a course that was sure to have but one result— to get her into bad odor 
 with all classes of the community. 
 
 The gentleman who was most prominent in bringing Dr. Fulton 
 to the city, and who led him around to one of the city papers to have 
 his lecture printed, has fallen by the wayside. He bit the dust after a 
 few days illness. 
 
 That grand classic and almost sublime work. "Why priests should 
 wed " I never hear of lately. 
 
 A recent scandal, in a church of the west end which was freely 
 ventilated in the courts and in which Mr. Massey was interested to the 
 tune of fifteen-hundred dollars, in still fresh in the minds of the public. 
 
 Mr. Longley, whose name figured in a possible scandal has left the 
 nation, and the auditorium, where all the escaped nuns etc., used to 
 hold forth is now used for any purpose that will yield a rent. It is 
 strange and incomprehensible. 
 
 Rev. Dr. Wild, whose anti-Roman proclivities are so well known, 
 is not now the pastor of the Bond street congregational church, where 
 men have frequently held forth against that church and one pastor Dr. 
 Sims sent in his resignation, on account of the financial condition of 
 the church. 
 
 Where are all the iPustrious prelates, made famous by the Equal 
 Rights Agitation a few years ago ? Sitting in the ashes of the ruins 
 they erected and thought would be lasting. How about those who 
 refused to be mixed up with the cry ? Rev. Dr. Potts, who was reproach- 
 ed for his inactivity during that campaign has only just refused one of 
 the greatest honors ever conferred upon a Canadian, — the pulpit of one 
 of the wealthiest and most influential congregations in the United States. 
 
 It seems to me simply a question as to how long it will be before the 
 Roman Catholic Church again reigns supreme. Let the unprejudiced 
 unbeliever look at the two bodies of people. Catholic and Protestant, 
 and I do not see how, in the light of reason, he could do otherwise than 
 join the Catholic Church, should he come to the conclusion that Chris- 
 tianity was necessary to his everlasting salvation. No church has 
 received the revilings it has received from every Protestant windbag 
 who considers himself divinely inspired, and yet it seems to thrive in 
 spite of this treatment Protestant churches are daily showing the world 
 their disagreements, fights, rows, etc., in which each faction is determ- 
 ined to give the other side the worst of it. No such disgraceful scenes 
 ever take place amongst Catholics. A priest or a minister is supposed, 
 I believe, to represent Christ, but in Protestant congregations they de- 
 cide for themselves which one of Christ's apostles shall preach to them. 
 
180 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 and the Lord help him if his teachings run counter to their wishes. In 
 the Catholic church a priest goes where he is told as the disciples did 
 in the time of Christ, and the people receive him as their, pastor who 
 ever he is, and without protest and without a fight. I do not think 
 there is a case on record where a Catholic congregation ever locked the 
 door of their edifice, and refused the priest sent to them admittance. 
 Yet the same cannot be said of Protestant congregations. Nor is there 
 anything sacred in a Protestant place of worship — it is a place to go 
 for enjoyment and display millinery, where you can go in late if you 
 wish to and if you did as Catholics do, bend your knee before entering 
 the house of God, you would in all probability be laughed at. A Pro- 
 testant minister is a busines man, who is paid for his services according 
 to his ability and the wealth of his congregation. A priest gets a living 
 and very little more, and sometimes both are very precarious. The 
 profession of one is a business. The other is an incessant sacrifice. 
 
 I listened to some young men at a Methodist ordination service, one 
 time, relate the histories of the inspiration by which they knew they 
 were called of God. I do not hesitate to say that every one of them 
 deliberately lied, when he gave such experience. If the conduct of 
 these younp men was despicable, how much more despicable it is on 
 the part of that church to require candidates for its ministry to tell 
 such falsehoods ? Would it not be far better to do away with such a 
 farce, or let the men come forward like men and say, " I wish to obtain 
 an easy livelihood at a good salary. I think I will enjoy the work, and 
 will do my best to give satisfaction to those who employ me, and en- 
 deavor to meet their wishes in whatever way they desire to conduct 
 their spiritual life." It would be more consistent to say the least of it. 
 Why should any man be compelled to perjure himself simply to com- 
 ply with the absurd theory that he preaches for Christ and that no 
 financial considerations influence him ? 
 
 Compare the two classes of men, and which is the more Christ 
 like ? The Protestant who permits every violation of church discipline, 
 who can arrange his " opinions " to accord with those of his congrega- 
 tion, who is called upon to make no sacrifice whatever, who knows what 
 salary be is to receive wherever he goes, and whose occupation is sim- 
 ply a business, which is well paid, or the priest, who is governed by 
 the scriptures which are the same to all, rich and poor alike, and cannot 
 be changed to suit the wishes or inspirations of his flock, who is obliged 
 to go where he is bidden, and labor for almost nothing, whose life is one 
 long sacrifice. 
 
 How many clergymen are there, or clergy and laity together foi 
 that matter, who act or attempt to act up to what Christ taught. His 
 disciples in the fifth chapter of Matthew ? *' Blessed are the meek. 
 Blessed are ye when men shall revile you and persecute you." So said 
 Christ to his disciples, but in the course of my long career, I have never 
 met a man or woman, clergy or laity, who did not do his or her best to 
 administer a thorough knock out to anyone who had crossed them. 
 Christian charity Ihey did not seem to know. I venture the assertion 
 
OP TOPONTO THE GOOD. 181 
 
 that there are not ten so-called Christians in a thousand who do not 
 expect to make a dying thief repentance, if their wordly acts count for 
 anything. I once stated this to a clergyman, and the only answer he 
 could make me was some inanity like " Judge not, that ye be not 
 judged." The merits of the case he would not and could not argue, 
 knowing quite well that I could have attacked the probity of 
 half his congregation, whose shortcomings he knew would not be safe 
 for him to attack, or he would very soon be taught to mind his own 
 business, and attend to his irane platitudes for which he was paid to 
 preach, reminding me of a joke I once heard some years ago. A preacher 
 had come to a village to relieve the regular incumbent. Before enter- 
 ing the pulpit he was button-holed by one of the elders who cautioned 
 him against saying anything against the hotel keepers. " They cont- 
 ribute to the church sometimes, you know," he said "so don't say any- 
 thing against them, but give it red hot to the Mormons." 
 
 The self-importance and absolute lack of genuine Christian char- 
 acteristics among ministers and their demonstrations that they are not 
 shining examples of piety to their flocks, have had the effect of produ- 
 cing upon the minds of the people that while it is good form and a 
 passport to respectability to belong to a church, it is by no means 
 necessary that they should follow any of the advice their pastors give 
 them, or do as he says they should do. In fact the very reverse is the 
 case. If I were a writer of fiction I would not wish any other advertise- 
 ment than that the clergy should denounce it. Its success would there- 
 by be assured. Surely no sane man will say that the literary merit of 
 Robert Elsmere made it famous. I read it, and say that it is just about 
 as prosaic and dull a piece of trash as I ever read, and I have read even 
 one of Mrs. Southworth's and one of Maxwell Gray's novels. But Mr. 
 Gladstone happened to take exception to something in it and wrote 
 against it. The success of the book was thereby assured. Zola's works 
 owe their immense circulations, not by any means to their elegance of 
 diction or anything else that I could ever see, but only to the fact that 
 clergymen have proscribed them. Ouida's works are the same, though 
 it is to be said that they do posssss rare merits in delineations of char- 
 acter. I read Zola's works simply because they had been suppressed 
 by some over sensitive people. I simply wasted my money. I sold 
 the books that I had paid fifty cents for at five cents a piece. It is the 
 same with everything. A party of Christian women passed a resolution 
 that newspapers should not publish lengthy reports of murder and other 
 sensational trials. A murder trial of the present day is like a court 
 reception. Crowds of ladies go there and hundreds are refused admit- 
 tance because they cannot get seating accommodation. The circum- 
 stances show how much influence clergymen and other Christian bodies 
 really have. It is nothing at all. 
 
 If clergymen are to have any respect paid to them or their op- 
 inions, it must be by noble deeds, as Carlyle says " not by noisy the- 
 oretic laudations of a church, but by silent practical demonstrations of 
 the church." 
 
182 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Christianity, or what passes for it, was beautifully exemplified a 
 short time ago by the wife of one of the most prominent clergymen of 
 the city of Toronto, as showing hew extremely little there is of practical 
 Christianity at all, but showing what takes the place of such, and is 
 accepted as such. I was in the train from Toronto to Hamilton when 
 this lady got on. She took two seats, and after seating her luggage 
 over one of them, she knelt on the other so that she blocked the way 
 of any impertinent person taking possession, while carrying on a con- 
 versation with her husband, who stood in the aisle. You have doubtless 
 seen a dog gnawing at one bone, while keeping his eye on another a 
 few feet away, and noticed how jealously he guarded it ? That is the 
 most apt illustration I can give you. When the train started this clergy- 
 man's wife was the only one in that coach who occupied two seats, yet 
 when a poor woman with a basket and a child came on board and 
 looked helplesly down the aisle, did she offer her one of her seats ? 
 Not by any means. She turned her head away in order that she might 
 not see her, and the woman was accommodated by a gentleman j^iving 
 her his scat. Now, there was no commandment violated by that Chris- 
 tian lady, J am quite prepared to admit, and anyone who would say 
 she was not going to heaven would be a fool. If " by faith ye are 
 saved " there can be no doubt of the lady's faith in the certainty that 
 she is going to heaven, consequently she is absolutely certain of future 
 reward. Pride, which goeth before destruction and selfishness, which 
 appeard to be this lady's chief attribute, are prominent characteristics 
 of modern Christianity, and I think no one will question the fact that 
 Christ, if He worked miracles when on earth, will have His powers 
 taxed to the uttermost to reconcile the diflercnt " grades " of earthly 
 society when they come before him, unless the same orders or degrees 
 of society prevail in heaven as on earth. That lady demonstrated 
 modern Christianity as it is practised more clearly than a volume of 
 theory could do. 
 
 Compare if you will the meek and lowly Jesus of Nazareth with 
 the self-sufficient, impudent, proud, overbearing and vindictive Phari- 
 sees who occupy pulpits in the majority of Christian churches to-day, 
 and wonder if he came to the earth again, what would he think of them, 
 or would he even be recognized by them ? 
 
 Christ sat with publicans and sinners. But if there came to the 
 house of God a man with marks of dissipation upon him, people almost 
 threw up their hands in horror, as much as to say : " Isn't it shocking ?'* 
 How these dainty, fastidious Christians in all our churches are going 
 to get into heaven I don't know unless they have a especial 
 train of cars, cushioned and upholstered, each one a* car to himself} 
 They cannot go with the great herd of publicans and sinners. Oh 1 ye 
 who curly your lip of scorn at the fallen, I tell you plainly, if you had 
 been surrounded by the same influences, instead of sitting to-day amid 
 the cultured and the refined and the Christian, you would have been 
 a crouching wretch in stable or ditch, covered with filth and abomina- 
 tion. It is not because you are naturally any better, but because the 
 
OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 183 
 
 mercy of God has protected you. Who are you that, brought up in 
 Christian circles and watched by Christian parentage, you should be so 
 hard on the fallen ? 
 
 A number of people have lately gone extensively into the business 
 of converting the Jews and Rabbi de Sola, of Montreal, gives them such 
 a scathing and well-merited denunciation that I give it. 
 
 At the Passover service in the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue 
 Montreal he preached a powerful sermon upon Israel's past, present, 
 and future, basing his remarks upon the text, "The right of the Eternal 
 is exalted, the right hand of the Eternal doeth valiantly. I shall not 
 die, but live and proclaim the works of the Eternal." Quoting the 
 words " Ye are my witnesses, said the Eternal, and my servant whom 
 I have chosen," he said : " For thirty-two centuries we have been per- 
 forming this mission, proclaiming to mankind the sovereignty and over- 
 ruling Providence o" the Almighty, and testifying to the supreme 
 excellence of the law committed to our care amid the thunders of 
 Sinai. Th it law inculcates the morality upon which the fabric of civilized 
 society rests ; and as the preservation of our identity as a distinct people 
 is the most conclusive proof of its divine origin and authority, we may 
 well stand amazed at the phenomenal infatuation of men who would 
 remove God's witnesses, who would destroy the living testimony to the 
 divine inspiration of the Bible, by converting the children of Israel from 
 their ancestral faith. 
 
 " While I shall be very sorry to charge the supporters of this 
 missionary movement with any hostile sentiment akin to that which 
 animates the anti-Semites, I do unhesitatingly characterize as most in- 
 solent the manner in which they talk and write about our people. They 
 speak of their 'work among the Jews' as if the Jews were heathens or 
 barbarian. The Jew has been God's servant in giving to mankind the 
 knowledge of the way of life ; he is God's living testimony to the 
 heavenly origin of that law to which all civilized beings bow ; and yet 
 men who acknowledge the law of Sinai, and who know that Providence 
 alone has enabled the Jew to outlive all attempts to destroy him, would 
 now induce him to abandon his character and his mission as God's 
 witness. Men who have received religion from the Jew would preach 
 religion to the Jew. But Israel has not been preserved through centuries 
 of trial to meet extinction in this missionary movement Divinely 
 commissioned, and divinely sustained, Israel will continue to proclaim 
 the sovereignty and over-ruling prc\/idence of the Almighty. Let the 
 supporters of the missionary movement pause, and consider these facts 
 — facts that are suggestively emphasized by the admittedly meagre 
 results that have attended what they are pleased to term their mission- 
 ary labors but which we regard as an impertinent interference with our 
 right as men and as British subjects, to adhere to our religion without 
 molestation. Money is spent lavishly in these conversiorist efforts. How 
 much of it is squandered upon people who find conversion pecuniarily 
 profitable ? How much better to apply this money to the relief of the 
 misery and suffering of the thousands who know not where to turn for 
 
184 OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 a crust of bread, or for a resting place on which to lay their weary limbs. 
 Convert the Jew ? There are otheis in infinitely greater need of con- 
 version. Convert to manhood the creature who staggers along in a 
 state of drunken bestiality. Convert to civilization those who desolate 
 homes with their murderous deeds. Convert to decency and chastity 
 those who gain a livelihood by prostituting the purity of manhood and 
 the honor of womanhood. With such evils polluting society, is it not 
 the very acme of folly and inconsistency to pass them by, and concent- 
 rate missionary zeal upon the Jew ? But, apart from the circumstance 
 that the Almighty has constituted in His witnesses and has preserved us 
 for a glorious future, what reason have we for abandoning our ancestral 
 faith ? Are the persecutions inflicted upon us for centuries in the name 
 of religion an argument in favor of our adopting that religion ? If the 
 patient endurance of outrage be an evidence of true religion, then the 
 Jew has indeed proved that he has nothing to learn. Not only has he 
 borne centuries of persecution with marvellous patience, but he proves 
 how foreign to his principles are fanaticism and intolerance, by pro- 
 claiming as a cardinal doctrine of his religion that 'the pious of all 
 creeds share in the happiness of the future state,' that the 'God of the 
 spirits of all flesh' does not restrict salvation to any race or creed. The 
 Jew adheres to those institutions which prevent his absorption by his 
 more powerful neighbors. But he does this simply in order that he may 
 live to proclaim the works of the Eternal. Fanaticism may persecute 
 him, bigotry assail hiir.. He will continue to perform his divinely 
 appointed mission undeterred, with no utterance of rebuke rising to his 
 lips save the golden words, 'Have we not all one Father ? Hath not one 
 God created us ?' " 
 
 In pointing out these foibles of the clergy of the present day, I 
 have endeavoured to do so without malice to any of them, and in using 
 the names of such, I have done so merely to show that all my cases 
 are legitimate and are not the figments of my own brain. In my judg- 
 ment it seems to me that there is practically no necessity for clergymen 
 at all. They are not better than anyone else, in any single respect. They 
 permit their congregations to do just as the congregations see fit, and 
 I am forced to the conclusion that the religion of the present day is 
 simply that people expect to make a death bed repentance, and expect 
 to go to heaven if they do so, as the case of the dying thief is always 
 held to apply to all sinners. Now suppose this be true, why was there 
 any necessity for Christ to give any instructions to the people as to 
 what they should do, when if a repentance like that of the dying thief 
 is to be sufficient. He might just as well have come to the earth, ?.nd 
 been crucified and pardoned the dying thief upon the cross. As an 
 evidence that the clergy are not in any respect respected, let me give 
 you the experience of Mr. Stead in Chicago, when he purposed addi-ess- 
 ing the workingmen. He was distinctly told that if he mentioned 
 Christianity he would be hissed down and why ? Simply because the 
 workingmen knew that in any difficulty between capital and labour, the 
 clergy were with capital every time, right or wrong. Why then should 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 185 
 
 these men entertain any respect for the clergy ? Clergymen are simply 
 the tools of their flocks. They preach what will please them, and they 
 preach nothing else. Inane platitudes, pleasing to the people who pay 
 them is the theme for the clergyman of to-day, and let him beware 
 who tries anything else. 
 
 As showing the immense influence of Christianity, here is an 
 example of recent occurrence : At Grimsby Park, where well known 
 clergymen, all the most advanced Prohibitionists, and Womens' En- 
 franchisement Advocates have their full say and which is moreover a 
 place of religious recreation, the following occurred as reported by the 
 Ottawa Free Press : 
 
 Grimsby Park, Aug. 25. — During his preliminary remarks in introducing the Rev. Dr. 
 Potts at Grinisby Park last night, President Phelps caused a wave of excitement to pass through 
 the audience by referring to the fact that the young ladies stay out at night. While walking 
 through the park after midnight he said he was pained to see young ladies and young gentlemen 
 roaming about. At these remarks smiles illumined the faces of the innocsnt young men, blushes 
 reddened the countenances of the git Is and a general feeling of uneasiness was manifested. In 
 indignant tones some of the young ladies were heard to remark that they didn't care a bit as 
 night was the nicest time anyway. 
 
 It is superfluous for me to state what every one in Canada knows, 
 namely, that Grimsby Park is the favourite summer resort of the clergy 
 of the Methodist church and the laity as well. I do not propose to 
 discuse whether there was any wrong committed there or not, but I 
 desire to state this much, that if you will find such a flagrant violation 
 of the rules of a park which, state that the lights must be out and 
 people in their cottages at ten o'clock at niglit, how clearly, it must 
 demonstrat-" the remarkably small amount of influence, clergymen or 
 there wises, religious or otherwise, have in their own families, and that 
 if such a violation of rules is made there, how much greater must they 
 be in other places, where there is no restarint, and it may consLstantly 
 be asked what did President Phelps see that he should make it the 
 subject of a special admonition to the assemblage at the Park. 
 
 Besides the class of women who congregate at Grimsby Park every 
 year as well as those who speak there are advocates of that relic of 
 antiquity the Curfew Bell, confirming my contention that these women 
 have no influence whatever over their own daughters, that they know 
 nothing at all of what they are doing, and that they simply desire to 
 shift the responsibility of caring for their morals toj^the shoulders of 
 some one else. ' hat is modern Christianity. 
 
 I submit the following advice, which I think is the advice of a 
 whole souled Christian woman, and I am sure if women, instead of 
 devoting their time to the ballot and such nonsense, would give some 
 such attention to their daughters, it would have a far more wholesome 
 effect than the ballot will ever have: 
 
 Mrs. Alice Kinney Wright, regularly installed associate pastor of 
 the Church of Reconciliation ard Prospect Heights Universalist church, 
 New York, has written for the Sunday New York World a sermon to 
 summer girls, Ker text is '• Keep thyself pure," I. Timothy, v. 22. Here 
 are some selected paragraphs from among the many good things she 
 
186 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 said : This "one thing needful " is a manly and womanly character, 
 built so solidly upon the foundation of purity and uprightness that not 
 all the demons of society shall cause it to tremble. Carve clearly and 
 deeply in the corner-stone of this foundation the divine injunction, 
 "Keep thyself pure." Strive at all times to live this sentiment ; then 
 let the rich young life in you have its full freedom, and you will not 
 only be the sunshine of your home, butjwill carry^with you an influence 
 for good wherever you may go. 
 
 Oh, how we all love and admire the sweet, pure girl who says, 
 " I do not believe in allowing my gentlemen friends those privileges 
 which rightfully belong to the man I intend to marry. I have not met 
 him yet, but he is going to be a good man, and I will reserve all rights 
 to myself for him." You girls who do not agree with this idea may call 
 her a "prude" and a "prim old stick." But if she has intellect and 
 grace along with her " prudish idea," she is just the girl that the self- 
 respecting young man wants for his wife. Young woman, when you 
 get so low down in the moral scale that you can when with your gent- 
 lemen (?) friends laugh at the obcene insinuation and listen to the quest' 
 ionable joke or story ; when you become so careless of yourself that a 
 caress means no more to you than a hand shake would to the modest 
 girl ; while you may pride yourself upon being " virtuous, that is, not 
 really bad," you are in the midst of grave dangers ; yon have fallen to 
 a level where you are subject to any insult, and from which no man 
 who respects himself will raise you to the dignity of wifehood. You 
 do not wish to win for yourself the unsavory reputation of the girl-of- 
 mary-engagements, and you should not enter hastily into the respons- 
 ibilities of wifehood. Be content lo wait until you are sure that you are 
 in love — and with a man. Above all things, do not mistake a dude or 
 a bank account for a man, because the result is sure to be disastrous to 
 your happiness. And do not experiment, but be guided, in this matter 
 at least, by the experience of others. It is not wise to venture when 
 the happiness or misery of a lifetime is the stake, God did not create 
 woman and place upon her such grave responsibilities without endow- 
 ing her with a constitution capable of great endurance. And our weak, 
 waist-contracted, insipid, know-nothing, do-nothing and good-for- 
 nothing society figureheads, instead of being admired, as in the past, 
 should, in accord with the trend of present thought, be looked upon as 
 unnatural monstrosities of the human family. Young women, let us 
 secure our divine birth-right, and carefully guard its transference to 
 future generations. I plead with >ou, add to your summer amusements 
 a large grain of thoughtfulnessand common sense ; add to those friend- 
 ships with your gentlemen companions a dignity that is infallible and 
 at the same time natural and unassuming ; then, being prepared in the 
 midst of all your frivolity and fun to repulse any undue familiarity on 
 the part of the man of many engagements, keeping the corner stone of 
 your character foundation uneffaced, you may always look back upon 
 your summer with perfect delight, unmarred by the sight of any dark 
 spots that you wish to cover, but cannot because you were not alone in 
 
OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 18T 
 
 your wrong doing. Rise, oh! manhood, in your youth and strength, 
 and go forward to meet the real coming womanhood with the whiteness 
 of her purity like a bridal veil about her, and, standing together upon 
 the principles of true living, crush beneath your united virtue that false 
 standard of morality upon which these men of much experience base 
 their vile theories. 
 
 Young men and women, let your friendships this summer be pure 
 and helpful ; sometimes talk together earnestly about the sober realities 
 of life and the id-ials that light up youth's vision. Then your summer's 
 experience together may add to the accumulating strength of our move- 
 ment towards social purity and sex equality. 
 
 Yet, how many girls a-e there who would think twice of foregoing 
 her present enjoyment by acting upon the advice above given ? 
 
 Some time ago I had a conversation with a young lady, or per- 
 haps I should say more correctly, a lady who is no longer young, but 
 who is unwiarried, who is deeply interested in the cause of Temperance. 
 She is, as she states herself, an advanced Prohibitionist, and in ringing 
 tones she demands the total Prohibition of the Liquor traffic. She in- 
 formed me that she was greatly pleased to see so many young people 
 taking such an interest in the good work, and Pointed with Pride, as 
 the saying is, to the fact that the Pavilion ^vas always crowded with 
 the young of both sexes. 
 
 I could hardly conceal my amazement at her cool audacity in 
 accepting this as a proof of their coinciding with her views. 
 
 " Surely," I remarked, '* you do not flatter yourself that these young 
 people come to hear you speak, and because they are interested in 
 Prohibition." 
 
 " Certainly, I do," she answered promptly. 
 
 " Then, I am very sorry to undeceive you," I replied, " if you will 
 take the trouble to see what becomes of these young people after they 
 leave here, you will tell a very different story." 
 
 " Why ? " 
 
 " Because they come here as it is a convenient place to meet at," 
 
 " Do you mean to say that this place is made a convenient place 
 of meeting by boys and girls ? " 
 
 " If you choose to put it in that way, yes I do." 
 
 Here was a woman, arguing for the complete prohibition of a traffic 
 which yields one third of the revenue of the country, a social reformer, 
 she called herself, and yet she had no more conception of the procli- 
 vities of young people than an inmate of an asylum would have had, 
 flattering herself that these young people came to the pavilion for the 
 purpose of hearing her speak on this subject. It seems to me that 
 social ignorance could go no further, than for her to take to herself the 
 solution of a great social question, and then show that she was preposte- 
 rous enough to suppose that she could attract a multitude of people to 
 hear her speak when by her own confession she was absolutely ignorant 
 of the customs society has relegated to itself. 
 
 Crowds of young people attend these meetings without a doubt. 
 
188 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 but when the meetings are over how many of them could tell what was 
 said. Comparatively few, if any. 
 
 There is this difference between the woman with whom I was 
 speaking and myself, she thinks she knows her subject, and she doesn't, 
 but I have seen, and I speak from experience. 
 
 If a young miss asked her mother's permission to take a walk on 
 Sunday afternoon, she might be refused. If shie asked permission to 
 attend a temperance meeting she would receive it. If a boy accom- 
 panies her home or part way home from a Temperance meeting, it is 
 all right. If he met her in the street and accompanied her home, it 
 might look bad, it is a fine distinction, but it is truth, . ^ 
 
 THE BAR. 
 
 The number of lawyers in Toronto is very large, numbering per- 
 haps away up in the hundreds. Of them comparatively few are in receipt 
 of handsome incomes. Men like Christopher Robinson, Edward Blake, 
 S. H. Blake, Dalton McCarthy and B. B. Osier, are the equal in legal 
 acumen of any on the continent, and rank with the best in the world. 
 The argument of the Hon. Edward Blake before the Privy Council in 
 England on the Boundaries question called forth the remark from the 
 Committee that it was either the ablest or one of the ablest that they 
 had ever listened to. Men of their strength cannot afford to do wrong. 
 They are well paid for their services, and there is no case of any mag- 
 nitude that comes up that two of the five at least are not engaged in, 
 and they enjoy a prominence enviable, but which has been brought at 
 the price of their own indomitable will, perseverance and remaikable 
 ability, combined with highest integrity. In addition to those mentioned, 
 there are numbers of men of more or less ability who, though clever, 
 have not the calibre these possess. 
 
 They have an association called the Benchers of the Law Society, 
 whose place it is to punish those members of the profession who fail to 
 keep themselves free from the sins that would land anyone else in prison. 
 
 The following are the Benchera who were elected for the coming 
 five years, and the votes they received : 
 
 M. H. Strathy (Barrie), 940; Chas. Moss, 931; B. M. Britton 
 (Kingston), 887; Wm. Douglass (Chathamt, 882 ; Hon. A. S. Hardy, 
 879; Christopher Robinson, 864; D. B. Maclennan (Cornwall), 852; 
 John Iddington (Stratford), 838 ; Dr. Hoskin, 836; Colin Macdougall 
 (St. Thomas), 835 ; B. B. Osier, 819; I). Guthrie (Guelph), 804 ; M. 
 O'Gara (Ottawa), 801 ; Geo. C. Gibbons (London), 797 ; R. Bayley 
 (London), 'jC^G ; A. B. Aylesworth, 730 , J. V. Teetzel ^Hamilton), 716 ; 
 A. Bruce (Hamilton), 715; George H. Watson, 700; Wm. Kerr (Co- 
 bourg), 681 ; A. H. Clarke (Windsor), 669; George F. Shepley, 666; 
 John Bell ^Belleville), 657 ; Ed. Mertin (Hamilton', 635 ; D'Alton Mc- 
 Carthy, 621 ; C. H. Ritchie, 609 ; W. R. Riddeii, 582 ; W. D. Hogg 
 (Ottawa), 579; E. B. Edwards (Peterboro'), 578 ; ./Emelins Irving, 572. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 189 
 
 The Telegram has an article that may be perused with the con- 
 sciousness that if it were not deserved, it would not have beei* writen : 
 
 No change could make the benchers less useful than thev have been, and any alteration 
 must, therefore, point towaids improvement The benchers of tne law society constitute a body 
 distinguished for appetite rather than for efficiency in the discharge of public duty. They are 
 more zealous to eat lunches than to maintain the honour of the profession, or to protect the 
 public against the buccaneers who infest too many Ontario law offices. The benchers fail 
 notoriously to protect professional honour or ihi swindled public. Their discipline la a fiirce. 
 Offences that force them to censure lawyers would imprison laymen. They exercise their 
 authority to discipline lawyers only in case of crimes where a non-professional scoundrel would 
 go to penitentiary. Even then conviction follows extreme guilt only when the offenders fail to 
 raise the money to compound the felony. The benchers need to wake up. Official life is to them 
 one long lunch. They are dining away the resources of the law society when they should be 
 tunning rascals out of the profession. .Some lawyers rob clients, but no lawyer ever goes to 
 gaol fur the crime. 
 
 The above has my heartiest approbation. It is not many years ago 
 that a young lady was swindled out of some money, and though time 
 out of number the case was brought up it was finally discovered that 
 the demands of the people required that the name of the man who 
 swindled her should be struck from the rolls, when it was finally done. 
 That was his punishment. A starving wretch may steal a loaf of bread, 
 but he is sent to goal or the Central. 
 
 Lawyers have more chances to be dishonest than other men have. 
 The proportion of sinners among lawyers is perhaps not large, but the 
 man with a wide circle of acquaintance in Toronto is fortunate if he 
 does not actually know of lawyers who have betrayed their trust by 
 crimes that would land a laymen in penitentiary. A list of the widows 
 and orphans who have been impoverished by the dishonesty of I iwyers, 
 and the names of the lawyers who have impoverished them withm the 
 last few years in Toronto, would astonish the public. Any well informed 
 man about town can without the slightest trouble give five or six specfic 
 instances of fraud by lawyers. There is no help for the infortunate 
 victims. Young children who were left well provided for may go upon 
 the street or become a burden upon relatives. Widows who could have 
 lived confortably upon the estate bequeathed by their husbands, have 
 had their resources stolen or blundered away. Where is the comfort in 
 assurances that the lawyers who have done this work did not intend to 
 do wrong ? Gentlemen who have taken other people's money cannot 
 plead their good intentions as a reason why they should not be sent to 
 Kingston. 1 he authority of the benchers is strained to its utmost limit 
 when they compel a dishonest lawyer to make restitution if he can 
 find the money, and let him alone if he has impoverished himself as 
 well as his clients. There ought to be some more powerful agency than 
 the Law Society for the correction of abuses in the legal profession. 
 There should be some tribunal which would sit in public and judge 
 between dishonest lawyers and their victims, and it is useless to disguise 
 the truth that victims of dishonest lawyers are unpleasantly numerous 
 in Toronto. 
 
 Ought not the Law Society to provide some easy method of en- 
 forcing the regulations which it fraiucs for upholding the honour of the 
 profession which it guards ? 
 
190 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 The man who is robbed by a lawyer now must not only have a 
 keen seme of his duty to the public, but a ^ood deal of money. If he 
 undertakes to punish the defaulter at his own expense, he is, in fact, 
 twice robbed. The sight of the delinquent stripped of his gown is poor 
 satisfaction to the man who in the first place had to lose the money, 
 and in the second place provide money for the punishmenf: of the soli- 
 citor who robbed him. There should be an officer of the Law Society 
 whose duty it would be to investigate all complaints against any prac- 
 titioner on the rolls. Exposure ought to follow in every case where 
 there has been genuine dishonesty. The individual who has been robbed 
 by one lawyer ought not to be called upon to pay another lawyer to 
 purge the legal profession of a rogue: 
 
 How is it that the powers of the criminal law are rarely, if ever, 
 exercised against trustees who speculate for their own profit with funds 
 placed in their hands for the benefit of widows, orphans or too-confiding 
 clients ? The facts developed by the processes of civil law at Osgoode 
 Hall leave little ground for hope that the crime of misappropriation is as 
 rare as is its punishment. The practice of using other people's money 
 as if it were your own is altogether too popular. There must be ten 
 betrayals of trust for every one that is recorded in print. It is with 
 authorities to cure, but it is with individuals to prevent, these crimes 
 which rob the helpless. The law ought to punish those who betray a 
 trust, not by the loss of a barrister's gown nor by financial damages, 
 but by terms in jail. And individuals should remember that vigilance 
 is the price at which they can purchase safety for the funds in the hands 
 of trustees. They should not take anything for granted. An honest 
 trustee will invite and welcome the utmost scrutiny. The closest scru- 
 tiny should come uninvited to the dishonest trustee. 
 
 The report of the committee of the Law Society, charged with the 
 duty of considering whether ex-Alderman W. H. Hall is entitled to 
 retain his rank in an honourable profession, is awaited with anxiety, 
 and will be read with interest. If the committee of the Law Society 
 decides that Mr. Hall has done nothing to forfeit his standing as an 
 honourable practitioner, it ought to supplement that decision by a state- 
 ment of the offences which a lawyer must commit before the Law So- 
 ciety will expel him. It is well enough that the Law Society should 
 be slow to use its great disciplinary powers. In this particular case the 
 profession has been discredited by the public acts of a public man, who 
 happened to be a lawyer. In other cases the Law Society has not inter- 
 fered either to pi Dtect or avenge clients who have been wronged by 
 lawyers, who still retain their rank in the profession. 
 
 Unversed in business matters and unable to read or write was the 
 late Eliza Roberts, an aged colored woman, who lived with Anne Berry 
 for years on Chestnut street. Had this not been so Barrister Joseph A. 
 Donovnn would not have been in the county jail. His incarceration is 
 the final act in the long standing suit which Mrs. Eliza Roberts brought 
 against him for the return to her of a lot on the west side of Spadina 
 avenue, above College. Prior to 1890 Mrs. Roberts alleged that Mr. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 191 
 
 Donovan persistently visited her and finally talked her into the belief 
 that she was not the absolute owner of the lot, that in fact she only had 
 a life interest in it. Believing this, and knowing that being nearly 90 
 years of age she could not hope to live but a few years, she was induced 
 by Mr. Donovan to sell the property to him for $300. The deed was 
 forthwith made out, but Mrs. Roberts was described in that deed as the 
 absolute owner. Shortly after Mr. Donovan secured a loan, giving a 
 mortgage on the property for security which mortgage now amounts to 
 nearly $5,000. The trial of the action which the aged colored widow 
 filed resulted in a judgment whereby Mr. Donovan was ordered to 
 remove the mortgage and to reconvey the property to its wronged 
 owner. Subsequently Mrs. Roberts died willing the property, when it 
 would be reconveyed to Anne Berry. Various appeals delayed the case 
 from time to time until a few weeks ago when Mr. Moss moved for and 
 obtained an order committing Mr. Donovan for contempt of court for 
 non-compliance with the court's judgment. 
 
 Nov. 21 the order was granted, but the clerk of Single Court wa? 
 instructed not to issue until after four days had elapsed. On one of 
 these Mr. Donovan was injured by the elevator at 9^ Adelaide street 
 west, the building in which his office is located. The order was then 
 further stayed. Saturday it issued, and Mr. Donovan may be compelled 
 to remain in jail until he purges his contempt. Mrs. Berry is now the 
 owner of the property, which is however still encumbered by the ?5,ooo 
 mortgage. The order also issued for the committal of Mrs. Donovan, 
 who virtually became the owner of the property by the deed but she is 
 not yet in custody, and it is said cannot be found. 
 
 MUSIC AND THE DRAMA. 
 
 For many years our ancient and beautiful city has taken unto itself 
 the title of " Musical Toronto." I think the origin of the ^x^.ession 
 can be traced to the gushing description given by a young man on one 
 of the city papers, in connection with the musical festival held some 
 years ago. With a sarcasm beyond his years, and of which he was en- 
 tirely unconscious, he praised to heaven everything connected with the 
 festival, though it might be inferentially observed that he probably knew 
 as much about music as a child V nows of metaphysics, and appeared to 
 be about as competent to criticise a musical performance as a party of 
 deaf mutes might be expected to give in an opinion on the rendition 
 of one of Mosart's masterpieces. I have no doubt, however, that he 
 sincerely believed it was a criticism, and in the usual and accepted de- 
 finition of that elastic term, it was doubtless intended to be such. 
 
 A fair criticism of a local concert, musicale or entertainment got up 
 under local auspices however, is entirely out of the question. Some, and 
 it is a great many years ago there appeared in one of the daily papers 
 a criticism of a performance by a local organization, and in the opinion 
 of the dramatic editor, there was given what he believed to be a fair 
 and impartial view of the performance, but the leader thereof was 
 
192 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 furious. He wrote a bitter and trenchant letter to the Managing Director 
 of the journal in question denouncing in unmeasured ternts the dramatic 
 editor's action, and threatening all the thunders of his wrath by with- 
 drawing his advertising patronage from it. 
 
 I have conveniently forgotten the gentleman's name and that of 
 his organization, but perhaps you can remember it. 
 
 However, it is worthy of note that it had one desirable effect, that 
 the press could thereafter depend on having local affairs criticised or 
 rather praised by some of the performers themselves, and you have only 
 to read the musical and dramatic news of any of the city journals to be 
 convinced of the truth of this statement. The following is a case in 
 point, and I think anyone reading it will come to the same conclusion 
 that I have that the vocation of the critic is a thing of the past, and not 
 a necessity in our present age : 
 
 The concert in the Parliament street Baptist church on Tuesday evening brought out a 
 large audience, who evinced their decided approval of the excellent programme rendered by 
 
 numerous encores. The^hief feature of the programme was the duet " Jesus, I love Thee " 
 
 " " Cnarles H. Thorn in such a i 
 
 liord," was given in fine styi 
 resulted. Of the playing of Prof. Farrington's orchestra and the singing of the Woodgreen 
 
 which was sung by Mrs. T D. Smith and Mr. Cnarles H. Thorn in such a manner as to bring 
 down the house. Mr. Kimber's solo, " The Lost Chord," was given in fine style and an encore 
 
 quartette it need only be said that they were as good as usual. Rev. James Grant presided in 
 his usual happy manner. " Alone on the midnight sea " was splendidly sung by Mr. H. E. 
 Davey and won him an encore. 
 
 Imigine a sacred Duo, sung in the House of God, bringing dawn 
 the house, 
 
 A correspondent addresses the Telegram doubtless being impressed 
 with the idea of the superior merits of " Musical Toronto." and his 
 language his decidedly refreshing, though it may be he thinks he is one 
 of the soloists, Toronto is so rich in : 
 
 Sir, — I suggest that the Philharmonic can recover the prestige of its palmiest days if it 
 selects works which have a reputation and employs local talent as soloists. Neg'ect of these 
 two considerations has alienated public sympathy from this society. Imported talent is not a 
 necessity as our city is rich in solo singers. The public care.'i little for new works ; let us have 
 some of the good old oratorios and public interest will be revived. The scciety that would 
 present Haydn's 'Seasons " would draw the largest audienee ever gathered in the city. The 
 " Messiah "would be acceptable if sung every Christmas. Follow this the coming year with 
 "Judas Maccabeeas," 'Joshua "or "Jephtha" towards spring, and the Philharmonic would 
 work itself back into the affections of the music lovers of Toronto. Try it and mark the result. 
 — Cato. 
 
 This correspondent like every one else it entitled to his or her 
 opinion, but just where the city rich in solo singers, I confess my inability 
 to see, there is not a tenor in the city worthy the name, and certainly 
 none who could sing " Judas Maccabeeas " or Mosart's "Twelfth Mass." 
 While in soprano there is Mrs. Caldwell, who stands alone without a rival. 
 
 It is to be wondered at ? 
 
 There is not a competent teacher in the city to undertake the cul- 
 tivation of voices, notwithstanding the fact of a number of people ad- 
 vertising such. I merely point to the fact that if there are competent 
 teachers where is the result of their work ? I have attended some of the 
 concerts in Association Hall, where embryo artists are wont to exhibit 
 their progress. I listened to a young lady with a somewhat reedy 
 soprano, screeching at the top of her voice in a mad plunge at high C. 
 
OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 193 
 
 If she reached it, she had certainly cause to be thankful, for that was the 
 only meritorious part of the effort, though perhaps it is unnecessary for 
 me to say she was encored. That, however, is the fate of all singers 
 in Toronto. They only require the assurance to stand before the 
 audience. The audience will undoubtedly encore them. Any young 
 lady who persuades herself that she is a second Patti, e.nd will yell to 
 the top of her voice on sonxe classical piece of music, cin count upon 
 receiving a most generous reception from her audience, because in en- 
 coring her they also express a degree of flattery to themselves, indicat- 
 ing as they do that their cultured tastes appreciate classical music, 
 though they may know nothing at all about it, and generally don't. 
 
 As the Telegram says : Toronto has a chorus of musical enthusiasts 
 whose alleged desire for high class orchestral entertainment makes 
 more clamour in the papers than their money makes noise in the box 
 office of the Massey Hall when a high class orchestra is playing inside. 
 
 I once attended a concert given by a choir called, I believe the 
 Toronto Scotch Choir, and while I desire to express my appreciation 
 of the meritorious action of the public in turning out to make it a 
 success, I confess that I am at sea as to what induced such lavish encores 
 to music that was only fair at best, and had a programme of some 
 twenty members to detract by its tediousness from whatever might have 
 been good in it I could understand and appreciate the fact of Mrs. 
 Caldwell receiving a warm reception, and being encored, but to this day 
 I am puzzled to imagine what, unless it were purely mechanical, ever 
 induced them to extend the same c. urtesy to a gentleman who was 
 called the " Hamilton tenor," and who rendered in his own peculiar way 
 " For a'a that," in a manner that a street gamin would have blushed 
 at, or if he wouldn't, then he deserved to be horsewhipped. The gent- 
 leman had no more music in nis voice than a peacock, and as for ex- 
 pression, it was entirely out of the question. I make no exaggeration 
 when I say that I have never heard his equal ar d I have heard some 
 of the worst singers in the world. 
 
 On this subject of encores, the Telegram seeing the necessity of 
 calling a halt, has the following : 
 
 Toronto could not afford to be measured by the faults of its concert audiences. Applause, 
 heart;^, long-continued and indiscriminate crowns every effort. Encores are too common to be 
 noticed. Orchestras, brass bands, balladists, comic singers and elocutionists are all 
 honoured with an enthusiastic recall. The average audience seems to be possessed 
 by an idea that it is so much ahead of the combination every time that it encores a favourite 
 When the worst song is a triumph and the worst singer is enthusiastically recalled the encore 
 ceases to be a compliment and becomes a nuisance. Besides, many people are kept away from 
 coBcertsby the certainty that an encore will follow every number on the programme. Like the 
 rain the encore falleth upon the just and the unjust, and the prospect of having to sit till mid- 
 night listening to oft-repeated ballads and comic songs is not attractive. 
 
 The reasons for this state of affairs are various. One of them is 
 the assertion I made before that instead of a fair criticism being made 
 of the work, nothing but praise rewards the efforts of the so-callto artists, 
 and to a very large extent the press is to blame. Does the reader for 
 one moment imagine that the programme of Saturday afternoon music 
 in Association Hall is the unbiassed criticism of the musical or dramatic 
 
194 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 editor of the paper in which it appears ? It certainly was not in my 
 career as a journalist, it is simply prepared by the institution in question, 
 and sent for publication. This I know to be the case with one paper 
 at least, and I see no reason to doubt the same circumstances exist with 
 regard to the others. 
 
 Some years ago Bill Nye lectured in Toronto and people were so 
 delighted with him that they get up and went o' t. He happ-^ned to be 
 under the management of the Press Club, consequently no adverse 
 criticism was made. His recent lecture, however, was dismal a failure, 
 that one paper remarked that Mr. Nye had called the Pavilion a race 
 track, and added that ^e no doubt would consider it so if he had to sit 
 on the hard benches and hear himself talk. 
 
 Mr. Nye was, very possibly, a humorist, and the people who held 
 that view point to the fact that his writings and sayings were copied 
 all over the United States and Canada. That proves nothing. It 
 simply demonstrates how badly off the press is for alleged wit, vhen 
 they publish such trash. 
 
 Blasphemy is wit, wit and irreverence is humour to Bill Nye, and 
 when the people of Paterson strewed his dress suit with rotten eggs 
 after one of his lectures, the fragrant offerings of their enthusiasm may 
 have struck the humourist as so many merry jests. 
 
 American humor would have agreably modified the austerity of 
 Puritan nature in the time of the Commonwealth. What would have 
 been a boon then, is developing into something very like .. nuisance in 
 these days when the tendency of thought, manner and life is towards 
 a point for removed from undue austerity. Toronto listened to Bill 
 Nye with a courtesy that ill-concealed its weariness. 1 he large audience 
 that came out to hear Robert Jones Burdctte on the strength of his 
 deservedly great reputation reached for its hat and wraps with a un- 
 animity that drove the lecturer from the platform. Certainly, Mr. 
 Burdette was the nrtost entertaining of all the platform humorists who 
 visit Toronto. His failure to please is a sign, first, of bad judgment in 
 the choice of a subject and in the make up of his lecture, second, of a 
 revolt against the humorists who assume that more or less picturesque 
 flippancy is a never-failing laugh-maker. 
 
 During the winter months the public are satiated with church 
 concerts which are always " grand," musicals and entertainments of 
 every description, and which are, for the most part, the work of ama- 
 teurs who are praised to the skies for their labour. One of the per- 
 formers usually writes up the event and is unstinting in his or her praise 
 of the artists ; but the good sense, happily, however, of the editor, pre- 
 vails, and a generous public are spared the affliction of having to wade 
 through a quarter of a column description of how Miss Samantha 
 Johnson-Macbeth scored a grand success in Gounod's immortel aria 
 Annie Ilooney. or how Miss Pauline Alexandrovina Dagmar was 
 applaad«d to the echo in her rendition of Mosart's masterpiece, Maggie 
 Murphy's Home. The following will demonstrate to what the public 
 are, or would be stalled if the sensible editor did not come to the rescue 
 and curtail such effusions. 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 195 
 
 Last Sunday was the occasion of the holding of the anniversary services of Broadway 
 Tabernacle. The eloquent and impressive sermons were aided in no small degree by the 
 sweet and expressive singing of the choir, who were assisted by Mr Robert Shaw the rising 
 young tenor, And by Misses Kleiser and Brimson, both of whose soprano voices were heard 
 with pleasure. Mrs. R. A. Howson, the otganist and choirmaster deserves the thanks of the 
 congregation for the appropriate and efifective manner in which the musical portion of the 
 services was rendered. 
 
 The concert given Tuesday evening in the Gerrard street Methodist church was a ma- 
 gnificent success. Seldom has a better programme been presented to a church congregation 
 than that enjoyed bv the large assembly. Miss Maud Bayne, Miss Clara Wallace, Miss Lily 
 Eaton and Miss Helen May Patterson were exceptionally happy in their selections and sustained 
 their reputations as favourite elocutionists. Mr. Spicer's songs were heartily appreciated, as 
 were also the solo and duett by Mr. and Mrs. Easton of Parkdale. " The cobbler " and the 
 " Fairies " by Miss Coulter of Islington won universal approval and M r. Dixon's ventriloquism 
 was applauded to the echo. Mr. Morris and .Miss Morden also took important parts in the 
 programme. 
 
 Just imagine the editor who is obliged to wade through such bosh. 
 
 One man, who has contrived through the instrumentality of lenient 
 newspaper men to puff his wife's musical pretentions up to the largest 
 capacity by multifarious notices in the dramatic columns, made a hab- 
 itual practice of coming to the office of the paper where I was employed, 
 and requesting to be furnished with proofs of the advertisements of 
 concerts where the lady was to sing, in order that he might make sure 
 that her name was the most prominent in the list of artists. It might 
 be mentioned that the advertising clerk had received instructions to 
 accept no advertising orders from this man unless accompanied by the 
 cash, or the order signed by some responsible party satisfactory to the 
 manager. He sent a lad into the office on one occasion and requested 
 that the proofs should be ready for him at 1 1 o'clock, to which the 
 clerk, myself, paid no attention whatever, and as he was to be acting 
 clerk that night, he was prepared for him, 
 
 At II o'clock or a little later he appeared, and in his most grandil- 
 oquent manner stated his business : 
 
 " I sent my office boy in here to order proofs for the advertisement 
 of the concert to be ready at ii o'clock." 
 
 •* Yes," the clerk responded, " and I think the boy was informed 
 
 that it would be necessary for him to have an order from Mr who 
 
 has signed the orders for the advertising." 
 
 " Good God ! " he exclaimed, " you don't mean to say the adver- 
 tisement is not set up yet." 
 
 " It is quite likely it is set up, but as to getting proofs for you, 
 you know that is out of the question." 
 
 " Is Mr in .'" mentioning rhe dramatic editor. 
 
 "Yes, I think he is." 
 
 " Is the elevator running ? " 
 
 " No, I think not." 
 
 He hurried away '-^ stairs and the clerk heard him walking up the 
 stairs. As a matter of lact it was within the power of the clerk to have 
 proofs if he wished, but the pleasure one always feels on sitting down 
 on a cad was too strong and he took advantage of his position to refuse 
 to accommodate him. I give you these particulars gratis, so that if you 
 know the person referred to you will know also how it comes that her 
 
196 OP TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 name was made the most prominent in the list c*" artists. It was not 
 that the was the leading personage on the programme as might be 
 imagined by the unsophisticated, but merely an act of grace on the 
 part of a good natured editor. 
 
 Appropos of the prominence given to the lady in question, it is 
 within the memory of Torontonians that on the opening night of the 
 Academy of Music, the particulur star was Miss Nora Clench, and an 
 artist of more than ordinary ability, and justly recognized as such ; but 
 Mr. Whitney Mockridge, who is not that heaven born singer he would 
 like to have people believe he is, felt himself so deeply aggrieved by 
 Miss Clench's name being set in larger type than his own, that he did 
 not wish to sing, and the concert was consequently delayed for an hour 
 on that account. If Mr. Mockridge really possessed any special ability 
 it would perhaps be excusable, though in any case it was perfectly 
 absurd, but to compare himself as a vocalist with Miss Clench as a 
 violinist is so ridiculous that he may be easily pardoned for the small- 
 ness of his soul in making an ass of himself, if that be possible, in 
 such a matter. 
 
 You need only read the papers of any of the large cities to see 
 the "arts and graces" employed to obtain newspaper notoriety which 
 now passes for fame, by actresses and singers. When Miss Claire 
 was to sing in Toronto, the papers were filled with the chivalric devo- 
 tion of her fiance, and the scandalous actions of Miss Lilian Russell in 
 the recent encounter of the two singers in Boston. I think there is 
 nothing more delightful than to have your private affairs brought before 
 the public through the newspapers, and I feel sure that you will agree 
 with me that it is in excellent taste. 
 
 Inasmuch as notoriety and fame are synonymous nowadays, I pre- 
 sume when some charming young debutante makes her bow, and the 
 expectant world is informed that her worthy mother was a prize-fighter, 
 the generous public will rush to see her, and give her a warm reception 
 in commemoration of the feats of valour performed by the notorious 
 mother. 
 
 On one of my visits to Toronto, I was invited to a concert to hear 
 a gentleman who lays claim to being more than an ordinary tenor, 
 sing, and was really surprised at his efforts. " He caii't read a note," 
 my friend exclaimed exultantly, as though this were something to be 
 proud of. To Blind Tom it is quite natural to refer as being unable to 
 read music, as in addition to being blind he is likewise an idiot, but 
 that a man in full possession of his faculties, who has been a public 
 singer for years, and music constantly before him, can truthfully say he 
 cannot read music at all, proves himself to be less than a blind idiot. 
 
 I have often thought that Toronto audiences were extremely ge- 
 nerous or profoundly stupid, though perhaps it is a moderate combina- 
 tion of both. When a new song is introduced by some comedian such 
 as " Near It," " I tried with my voice to enchant Her," and others less 
 pleasing, those who have not heard them from the lips of the singer 
 who originally introduces them, will certainly bear me out. As a matter 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 197 
 
 of fact a teacher like Etnilio Belari would not condescend to teach in 
 Toronto, but even were he disposed to do so, after he had fought 
 through the opposition he would have to encounter, he might feel like 
 giving up in disgust When a gentleman came from Boston to give a 
 season of lessons, one of th^ city papers whose critic is also one of the 
 musical professors, I believe, proceeded to deprecate in a general way 
 people who came to the city for a few months' course thereby undoing, 
 if that were possible, what had been done to build up these voices by 
 careful training, &r., &c., and stating that these people never came to 
 the city a second time, though with a delicacy of feeling that was com- 
 mendable he did not state that some of these pupils were so well 
 pleased with their teacher that they underwent the expense of goinc 
 to Boston to receive instructions there. However, you may conceiv^^ 
 the mental capacity of the writer of this article when in criticising of a 
 certain play, he had sufficient regard for the truth to say that one 
 young lady on the bills in a certain play, was forty years of age, when 
 she was certainly not more than eighteen. 
 
 Again in the case of the Scotch choir I mentioned the press had 
 nothing but the highest praise to bestow upon it, which as I previously 
 pointed out was entirely unwarranted by the performance. So, too, in 
 the case of the Balmoral choir which visited us some years ago. It was 
 lauded to the skies, though, and I speak with all sincerity, it had no 
 advantage over any other organization of a similar nature, though it 
 is not saying much for it. Yet it received eulogies that even the great 
 Patti herself might have envied. Hence my contention that newspaper 
 criticism is unreliable is fully borne out by the facts. It is to be remem- 
 bered that in the cases of these two organizations, members of the press 
 were in some way connexted with them. In the first they were mem- 
 bers of the Scotch choir, and the Balmoral choir was under the patron- 
 age of the Caledonian Society which numbers amongst its members 
 quite a large number of journalists. Is it, therefore, likely that they 
 would give an adverse criticism, or in fact give a criticism at all ? 
 
 Of the drama itself it seems unnecessary to speak. The three opera 
 houses all cater for the best possible custom, and their efforts are well 
 rewarded. The aim is to provide the very best talent on the continent, 
 and a really good play or opera is well patronized. The Grand, the 
 Princess, and Jacob's & Sparrow's each has its respective class of plays 
 and comparative prices, and very rarely an inforior show comes to 
 either. 
 
 In a recent benefit at which Manager Sheppard of the Grand made 
 a speech, the public were told that theatrical companies always said 
 that if a Toronto audience approved, they were successful elsewhere. 
 This seems to be a popular way of flattering any town or city into the 
 idea that its tastes are fastidious. I have heard Ottawa people say the 
 same thing, St. Catharines, Hamilton and Montreal as well. In one 
 of Roland's Reed's plays there is a scene in an asylum, and the stereo- 
 typed remark made by every one incarcerated is: "You know I* in not 
 in here because I'm insane, it is only to see a friend of mine." And 
 
198 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 after soothing the patient the motherly matron says to herself: " Poor 
 fellow, that's what they all say." See any connection ? 
 
 Great and multifarious are the means employed to advertise this 
 or that singer or artist. Take as an example young Kavanagh, who 
 appeared in the Metropolitan church. The public were informed that 
 he had been introduced to the divine Patti, who after hearing him sing 
 " Angels ever bright and Fair," an^ "In verdure Clad," expressed her 
 appreciation, and kissed him. 
 
 Quite frequently I am at a loss to understand what theatrical 
 managers are thinking about when they are forming their companies, 
 and employing the actors and actresses for the different characters. In 
 some cases it would seem that the law of reversion was pursued with a 
 total disregard as to how it looks on the stage. 
 
 As a fair example take the play " Struck Oil," I think it is, where 
 a girl of innocence and principle is supposed to be embodied in " Nan." 
 It is only supposition, however. A great, coarse looking woman of about 
 thirty-five makes the character a laughing stock. Similarly in Alvin 
 Joslin, as played by some Company other than Charles L. Davis'. A 
 crisp looking damsel is stated in the programme to be a "fashionable 
 lady," and it is well that the programme says so, otherwise the public 
 would be in profound ignorance of it. A woman on the shady of forty, 
 thin and attenuated, whose appearance betokens a distressing familia- 
 rity with the wash tub is in perfect good faith advanced to us as a lady 
 of fashion. Even if nothing else did so, her costumes would belie the 
 character. The same deficiency exists in regard to Irish pays, particu- 
 larly Joe Murphy and Scanion. The first time I heard Joe Murphy I 
 was dumbfounded. The press had been prodigal in its praise of him. 
 His first song was Milloy's " Kerry Dances," and I never, I am happy 
 to say, heard it rendered similarly before nor since. It was absolutely 
 murdered. The first bar contains a G, but since Joe Murphy cannot 
 do an impossibility he did not attempt to touch it. He went over the 
 words in a sing-song fashion, without either accuarcy or expression, 
 and it is perhaps, not necessary for me to add that he was encored. I 
 do not think I am in any respect deviating from the truth in stating 
 that neither Joe Murphy nor Scanion can sing. It is true they go over 
 the words but the music is changed to meet their voices, the high notes 
 they never attempt, and so fa»- as there being any music in their voices 
 it is absurd to pretend it. 
 
 QUACK DOCTORS. 
 
 Owing to to the protection afforded by the Medical Act, Canada 
 generally is free from these curses of modern civilization the quack 
 doctors ; but if they are not permitted to practise, there is nothing de- 
 barring them from the boon of .advertising and the credulity of the 
 public, which is a marked characterii.i;ic of the human race, frequently 
 exhibits itself in this country. The quacks or medical imposters to 
 whom this chapter is devoted live upon credulity, and do all in 
 their power to encourage it. 
 
OP TORONTO THE GOOD. IM 
 
 Some of these people live in Toronto, and a great many more in 
 the United States, and they ofifer to cure any and every manner of di- 
 sease. Some offer their wares for a small sum, others charge enormous 
 prices. Frequently one of these men will personate half a dozen different 
 characters. The newspapers are full of their advertisements, some of 
 which are really unfit for the columns of a respectable journal. Besides 
 this, they send thousands of circulars through the mails to persons in 
 various parts of the country, setting forth the horrors of certain diseases, 
 and offering to cure them by their remedies. The circular contains an 
 elaborate description of the symptoms or premonitory signs of these 
 diseases and a very large number of persons reading these descriptions 
 really come to the conclusion that they are affected in the manner 
 jtated by the quack. So great is the power of the imagination in these 
 cases, that sound and healthy men are sometimes absolutely led to 
 believe themselves in need of medical attention. A short conversation 
 with their regular physician would soon undeceive them, but they 
 foolishly send their money to the author of the circular in question, and 
 request a quantity of his medicine for the purpose of trying it. The 
 nostrum is received in due time and is accompanied by a second circular 
 in which the patient is coolly informed that he must not expect to be 
 cured by one bottle, box or package as the case may be, but that five 
 or six or sometimes a dozen will be necessary to complete the cure, 
 especially if the case is as desperate as the letter applying for the me- 
 <iicine seems to indicate. Many are foolish enough to take the whol» 
 half dozen bottles or packages, and in the end are no better in health 
 than they were at first. Indeed, they are fortunate if they are not 
 seriously injured by the doses they have taken. They are disheartened 
 in nine eases out often, and are at lengthreally in need of good medical 
 advice. They have paid the quack more money than a good practitioner 
 would demand for his services, and have only been injured by their 
 folly. 
 
 It may be said that no honest and competent physician will un- 
 dertake to treat cases by letter. No one worthy of patronage will 
 guarantee a cure in any case, for an educated practitioner understands 
 that cases are many and frequent where the best human skill may be 
 exerted in vain. Further than this, a physician of merit will not ad- 
 vertise himself in the newspapers, except to announce the location of 
 his office or residence. Such physicians are jealous of their personal or 
 professional reputations, and are proud of their calling. They use their 
 knowledge for the good of mankind, and are prompt to make known 
 their discoveries, so that all the world may enjoy the benefit, they them- 
 selves being rewarded with the fame of their invention. Not so with 
 the quacks. Some few have some medical knowledge, and are even 
 graduates of regular colleges, but the majority have neither medical 
 knowledge or skill. They know thtir remedies are worthless, and they 
 offer them only to make money. They know that in many cases their 
 nostrums will inflict positive injury upon their victims, but they are 
 careless of the harm they do. They live upon human misery. The 
 
200 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 reader may rest assured that not a single physician who conducts his 
 business by means of circulars oi advertisements is really competent 
 to treat the cases he professes to cure, and that no one knows this better 
 than himself. 
 
 Some time ago a firm of physicians so-called, with a great emhla- 
 zonation of advertisements, anounced " They are coming," and again 
 " They are here," and how in the world they managed to dupe the 
 public or obtain a foothold is absolutely incomprehensible. One of the 
 city newspapers, however, can tell the profound manner in which they 
 were duped, and how payment for the glaraig advertisements has never 
 been made to this day. 
 
 As a general rule the various medicines advertised as specifics or 
 panaceas for various ills, are humbugs and are utterly worthless. Many 
 of them are made up of harmless drugs, which can do no harm, if, as 
 is almost certain, they do no good ; but others again are composed of 
 very dangerous substances. The remedies advertised for " private 
 diseases " rarely fail to make the patient worse either by aggravating 
 the disease itself or by permanently injuring the constitution. Vital 
 fluids and others of that ilk, generally contain mercury to a large ex- 
 tent, and anyone conversant with the properties of this substance can 
 easily understand how great is the danger in using them. The variov 
 bitters which flood the country are only cheap whisky or rum and water, 
 made nauseous with drugs. They have no virtue whatever as medicinal 
 agents, and merely injure the tone of the stomach ; their chief result 
 being to establish the habit of intemperance ; they are more fiery than 
 ordinary liquors, and destructive in their effects. The various medicinal 
 wines that are offered for sale are decoctions of elderberrj' juice and 
 kindred substances and are more hurtful than beneficial. The hair dyes 
 advertised under so many different names contain such poison as nitrate 
 of silver, oxide of lead, acetate of lead, and sulphate of copper. These 
 are fatal to the hair, and generally injure the scalp. The ointment for 
 promoting the growth of whiskers and mustaches is either perfumed 
 and colored lard, or poisonous compounds which contain quicklime or 
 corrosive sublimate, or some kindred substance. If you have any 
 acquaintance who has ever used this means of covering his face with a 
 manly down ask him which came first the beard or a trublesome eruption. 
 
 Different newspapers often contain advertisements like the follow- 
 ing : " A retired physician of forty years' practice having had placed in 
 his hands a certain cure for consumption, bronchitis, colds, etc., and 
 will send it to all sufferers on receipt of a three cent stamp. &c., &c." 
 
 A single moment's reflection ought to convince any sensible person 
 that the parties thus advertising are frauds, if they remember that it 
 costs a great deal of money to advertise ; and as the announcements 
 referred to can be seen in scores of papers, it is safe to say that they 
 spend thousands of dollars a year in advertising. Letters come asking 
 him for his valuable prescription which he sends and notifies the party 
 asking for it that if the articles named in it cannot be obtained by him 
 at the drug store convenient to him, he will furnish them at a certain 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 201 
 
 sum, which he assures him is very cheap as the drugs are rare and ex- 
 pensive. Again a great many people have a reticence in going to a 
 city drug store where they may possibly be known, with such a pres- 
 cription, and will frequently send the money to escape such comments 
 as the druggist may possibly make. I was reading a few days ago of a 
 man who had been entrusted with a secret prescription for the cure of 
 something or other by a physician who was on his death bed, and gave 
 it to him for the benefit of suffering humanity. 1 laughed when I read 
 it, and thought how gullible must be the public for a fake like that 
 to succeed. 
 
 Another matter that will strike the reader is the fact that if he 
 once sends his money there will be no end to the number of people who 
 have similar remedies, and he will wonder where th-y got his name. 
 It is very simple. They are perhaps one and the same person or firm» 
 and if not they have possibly purchased the names from another house. 
 How it is done is not a matter of much consequence, but it is certain 
 that when once a name is given to these sharks they seem to have the 
 faculty of having It pretty well advertised that you require the treat- 
 ment they deal in, and if they cannot sell you the goods themselves 
 they will :ry to find some one else who can. 
 
 Men have grown rich in the business, and it is carried on to an 
 amazing extent in particularly American cities, and to a certain extent 
 in Canada, but the advice given in regard to quack doctors holds' 
 equally good in respect to patent medicines. 
 
 Some time ago a young friend of mine was suffering from a disease 
 of a private nature, and answered an advertisement inserted by one of 
 the druggists in the city, who, after giving him some medicine, ins- 
 tructed him to perform an act upon his own body that almost killed 
 him, besides the grossly immoral nature of the act. I do not know 
 what redress the young man could have got, but it would have been 
 infinitely satisfactory to me to have seen the druggist punished for his 
 advice, which could have been actuated only by the most morbid ideas. 
 To the general public it might seem that the patient might have known 
 better, but that does not in any respect excuse the action of the druggist 
 in advising an act that at that particular time would have been most 
 disastrous had not the constitution of the patient been able to with- 
 stand it, but it demonstrates my point that no one suffering from any 
 disease of a serious nature or any disease at all, for that matter, should 
 consult a druggist or use quack medicines for its cure, as you are almost 
 morally certain to be humbugged. 
 
 In the preparation of this article, I wrote to a large number of so 
 called patent medicine dealers for circulars explaining their remedies, 
 and I have given you the pith of what they contain, but the following 
 is really too ^ood to cut down, so I give it in full, and while I do not 
 say anything against it, I submit it for your careful consideration. It 
 is intended to show the reliability of the house issuing the circular, and 
 if you will take the trouble to analyse it, you will see that the fullest 
 information was afforded the brother to transmit to his applicant. The 
 
202 OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 bank account is reported 3s being fat, and being kept at three banks, 
 and in respect to tha': I must confess that bankers must be peculiar 
 people in the United States if they will give their customers' business 
 away in that style. 
 
 The following is the letter : 
 
 My Dear Hrother ; — Your letter only received, and I have delayed writing until T could 
 answer your inquiries regarding the . . . fully. Vou know when I start to do a thing. I genor- 
 ally do It right. I devoted a whole day to this investigation and make the following report : I 
 first visited the ofRces, which extend the whole length and width of the large building tney occupy. 
 There were, I should judge, about twenty persona employed there as clerks etc., all seemed 
 very busy. The manager showed me all through their establishment, explaining their method 
 of filling orders etc., it seems that all orders are filled the same day as received. I next visltod 
 the consultation office, where the physician in charge explained the actions of the appliances 
 they manufacture. To demonstrate the superiority of the articles he has in the oflice samples 
 of every kind manufactured in the U.S„ and by means of the .... he convinced me that their 
 manufacture gives four times as much strength as the others. Two of the rivals that sell so 
 high he proved give no strength whatever. He showed me hundreds of testimonials from all 
 parts of America. He also showed me orders from every part of the world. Europe, Asia, 
 Africa, Sandwich Islands, Brazil, Australia, Mexico and Japan. I was perfectly satisfied from 
 what I saw that their goods were all that they represented them to be, aad that they did an 
 immense business. I next visited their bankers to find their financial standing. I find that they 
 own real estate in this city, worth I should judge, about seventy-five thousand dollars ; that they 
 have a fat bank account at three of the leading banks, and are without doubt perfectly respons- 
 ible. In canclusiun, brother, I would by all means advise you to try their treatment, and I 
 feel sure from what I have seen that you will find^their goods just what they represent them to 
 be and also that you will be honestly .dealt with. 
 
 Your, affectionate brother, 
 
 I submit the following, which I think will strike the common sense 
 reader us being the maudlin raving of a drunken ass, if anyone outside 
 of the office of the concern wrote it : 
 
 An earnest man who had suffered, hesitated, then put it to the test, writes thus : 
 " Well, I tell you that first day is one I'll never forget. I just bubbled with joy. I wanted 
 to hug everybody and tell them that my old self had died yesterday and my new self was born 
 to-day, Wny didn't you tell me when I first wrote that I would find.it this way ? " 
 
 While there will not be any question of the desirability of having 
 the medical profession as rigidly exact as possible, it may strike a 
 great many as being too rigid in its discipline with its own members. 
 For instance, a medical man is not permitted to advertise himself any 
 more than his address and his speciality if he has one. Breach of this 
 rule permits the council to deal with him as it may think proper. 
 Some years ago Dr. McCully used to advertise quite extensively in the 
 daily papers, and make very frequent assaults on the general hospital, 
 which he irreverently stigmatized as the "old mill." The council at that 
 time, I believe was unable to reach him, but one would imagine that 
 the law courts might have afforded redress. One hallow e'en some of 
 the brilliant medical students congregated in front of his residence and 
 showered it with stones. Dr. McCully showed his appreciation of this 
 compliment, and fired into the crowd. For this he was summoned and 
 discharged, and at the same time I have no doubt he received the 
 thanks of thousands of Toronto's citizens for his courage. The students 
 in council assembled a few days Tater drew up a heroic resolution of 
 sympathy with one of the young men, who received the charge from 
 the doctor's gun, but tradition does not say that in addition to their 
 
OF TORONTO THE GOOD. 203 
 
 bravery any one of them acknowledged himself as having thrown 
 stones at the Doctor's house. Such bravery as that would probably be 
 too much to expect The resolution of condolance was as far as their 
 chivalry could go. It might be thought by the uninitiated that the 
 powers of the Doctors are sufficiently great, or that they might be 
 somewhat curtailed. The judge who tried the prisoners in the Sharon 
 poisoning case had the hardihood to say that the expert medical evid- 
 ence was absolutely valueless, as it would seem to him, that any evidence 
 a lawyer wished to procure, the doctors would give him, and that it was 
 utterly worthless. No one knows that the Medical Council passed 
 resolutions condemning his aspersions. It may be that they were well 
 founded. Besides it may be remembered that one of the leading phy- 
 sicians, or at least a man who considers himself such, gave a permit for 
 burying an abortion, when the latter was alive. This matter was vent- 
 ilated by the leader of the Opposition in the Ontario House during a 
 recent session. Perhaps it might be in the public interest if the doct- 
 ors had some restrictive legislation passed for the benefit of the public 
 However that is a matter for the public. 
 
 The fact of the matter is simply that doctors wish to maintain a 
 monopoly, and all their heroics to the contrary would not change my 
 opinion one iota. 
 
 Similarly with the druggist. They have so long enjoyed the mo 
 nopoly of charging the public twenty cents an ounce for water, that 
 when Eaton and Simpson decided to give the public the benefit of low 
 prices the latter was promptly brought up on a charge of violating the 
 Pharmacy Act and fined. Any other than an unworthy motive, did not 
 prompt this display of spleen. Mr. Simpson had a licensed chemist to 
 work for him, who could probably compound drugs just as well and 
 probably considerably better than those who incited the prosecution. 
 
 Daniel Boyer, the Markham curer of cancer, was tried at the Police 
 Court on a charge of having infringed upon the provisions of the Me- 
 dical Act by treating Miss Rosu Gates, of Wilton avenue, for fibroid 
 tumor in March last. The Crown called Miss Cates, who swore that, 
 having become afflicted with the tumor and fearing that it would de- 
 velop into cancer, went to Markham to consult Boyer. The latter is the 
 inventor of a patent plaster which when applied to a cancer •' draws it 
 out by the roots." She stated her case to him and secured several 
 plasters and, as her mother was a woman of nervous temperament, she 
 decided to remain at Boyer's house while undergoing treatment. For 
 board for eight days and for the plasters she subsequently paid him 
 $13. In all her evidence it did not appear that he had tendered her 
 any medical advice. He simply sold the plasters as a patent medicine. 
 Moreover she was cured. The case fell through. 
 
 The News observes " If the Markham man who was in court yes- 
 terday has a plaster that can cure tumors, as a patient swore in her 
 testimony, it is an outrage that he should not be allowed to sell it to 
 the poor sufferers without being prosecuted for it. Surely the health — 
 even the life of a person — is of more consequence than the maintenance 
 of medical ethics," 
 
204 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 SITUATION AGENCIES. 
 
 There are inserted, almost every day, advertisements for help 
 wanted, but just how far they are beneficial is a matter for those in- 
 terested to judge, but before you invest your money, carefully peruse 
 the following article, and decide for yourself: 
 
 Of alt the investments known the one least likely to produce any return is the fee paid to 
 an employment bureau for assistance promised in securing a position. The possibilities held 
 out by the agent are immense. The probabilities are not so great. The number of situations 
 secured in comparison to the number of applications received are diccouraginglv small. 
 
 >^ 11 employment agencies are liccnsea. A by-law regulates the fees alloweo to be charged. 
 The books used m transacting business are all open to public inspection. These are perhaps 
 the greatest evils. Intended, as the by-law was, to be a safeguard to the public, it only mspires 
 confidence, it affords no protection. This is an industry that prospers best in times of adversity. 
 The bird of action grown fat when death is in the land. The emplopment agent succeeds beat 
 when the bread-earner fares worst. When work is scar''e applications for aid to find it are many. 
 All applications arc accompanied by the necessary fee. The unemployed are kindly received 
 in these places. These agents, philanthropists are their friends. The fees charged are as follows 
 for domestics, 50c ; for governesses, female bookkeepers, clerks, stenographers, etc., $1 ; for 
 laborers, 50c ; and for coachmen, male bookkeepers, clerks, etc., $1. If a situation is procured 
 ,t he whole amount paid is kept. If the attempt is fruitless, as is too often the case, half the 
 amount paid is returned to the applicant. The applicant is promised the assistance of the agent. 
 The assistance consists in registering the name m a register for the purpose and permitting the 
 person seeking employment to drop into the employment ofiice occa&ionally for a period often 
 days. The last is no great privilege as the usual furniture for such oftices » one table and one 
 chair, or per adventure two. One may, of course, lean up against the wall. 
 
 " We do not," said one of these agents, "guarantee that w'j will get any applicant a 
 position. We merely promise to try." 
 
 " What does your trying amount to ?" 
 
 " We are in correspondence with many large warehouses and factories ; that is we 
 advertise." 
 
 " About what percentage of the applicants do you find positions for ? " 
 " I am not prepared to say, but that has really nothing to do with the business." 
 The mention of advertising recalls an incident which happened at the time of the Indus- 
 trial Fair last year. One of the employment bureaus advertised for girls to work on the Exhi- 
 bition grounds. At least two of those who applied and who paid the necessary fee were directed 
 to a fictitious address. They returned and aemand d the money back which they had paid. 
 This was refused and was only received by police interference. 
 
 There is another case where men were advertised for to go to the lumber woods. When 
 they went to the woods to which they were directed, they found there was no work for them. 
 
 This sort of thing should be stopped. There is nothing meaner or more csntemptible than 
 this trafficking on the necessities of the poor and unemployed. Faint hopes are presented. The 
 unfortunate snatch at faint hopes. A little reflection would show the employer of labour need 
 not apply, and as a matter of fact do not often apply to these agencies to fill these positions. The 
 very large majority of them have any number of applications always on hand and they find it 
 an easy matter to select men to fill vacancies. 
 
 Barnum is said to have remarked that people like to be humbugged. So long as this is 
 true it would be scarcely charitable to rob the public of such a fruitful source of amusement, 
 and this is perhaps the only apology for the existence of employment bureaus. 
 
 Several well-dressed, respectable young men called at Police head- 
 quarters and reported a contemptibly mean swindle that they claimed 
 had been perpetrated upon them. According to their statement they 
 answered the following advertisement which appeared in the evening 
 papers : 
 
 Wanted— 50 men for the lumber woods, wages, $26 to I3S, board'and fares paid. Apply 
 45 Wallace avenue, near DufFerin street, after 5. 
 
 At the address indicated in the advertisement they met a man 
 who represented to them that he had received instructions from a lum- 
 berman to engage that number of men. He taxed aU that he engaged 
 
OP TOBONTO THE GOOD. 206 
 
 25 cents as his commission, and ordered them to report at the Union 
 station for transportation, only to cause them to meet with bitter dis- 
 appointment as there was no one there to meet them. Some of the 
 young fellows smarting under the sad experience went to the house, 
 intending to have a reckoning with the individual who made the en- 
 gagement, but found the house empty, the bird having flown. A war- 
 rant was issued for his arrest. 
 
 SWINDLERS. 
 
 Of the various schemes resorted to by mankind to swindle his brother 
 it would be impossible to say which in the worst, or where they origin- 
 ate, but one would think that with the oft-recurring warnings of the 
 press, people would learn to beware of such people. The following 
 affair seems so patent on its face that one is surprised at people of 
 intelligence biting at it : 
 
 According to an advertisement that had appeared in several rural 
 weeklies, a new weekly paper called the Cosmopolitan Advertiser was 
 about to be issued in Toronto. The publisher was stated to be W. 
 Armand, Box 2,537 Toronto P. O. He offered as a premium for a 
 subscription price of $1 for six months a solid gold watch made by 
 the Charles Stark Company. The postal authorities entertained a sus- 
 piaion that the deal was not all right and an interview with Inspector 
 Stark followed. He detailed a detective to watch for the person who 
 took the letters out of box 2,537 and W. R. Wood, a young man em- 
 ployed as clerk in the Budget office, 64 Bay street, called for the letters. 
 He was promptly escorted ever to the police headquarters where a con- 
 sultation with Inspector Stark took place. Wood stated that he held a 
 power of attorney from Armand, whose address he did not know, but 
 who, he believed, resided in the States. He met him through answer- 
 ing an advertisement. He claimed that Armand was at present nego- 
 tiating with Toronto printers to publish the new journal. He received 
 thirty four letters the previous day and another large number the day 
 of his arrest. These letters were all handed over to Inspector Stark, 
 and $24 of the money previously received. The balance he said he had 
 turned over to Armand who had been in the city the day previously. 
 He also surrendered the key to the Post office box. The Charles Stark 
 Co. repudiate having any business dealings with either Armand or Wood. 
 F. E. Handy was the first witness called for the prosecution. He 
 testified that he enclosed a dollar addressed to box 2,537 Toronto. He 
 sent money to William Armand. He had an idea that it was a fraud 
 but he made up his mind to try it anyway. Detective Stark identified 
 the letter written by Mr. Handy as having been among the stock of 
 letters the defendant Wood had handed to him. He recounted the 
 details of the interview that took place between Wood and himself, in 
 which the former admitted that the scheme looked like a fraud, but he 
 was dragged into it through an advertisement. The Magistrate com- 
 mitted Wood for trial on his own bail. 
 
206 OF TOKONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 Advertising is essentially one of the best means for the swindler 
 to use for his purpose, and no matter how vigilant the newspapers may 
 be it is impossible to check the different schemes they invent 
 
 Wanted — Treasurer for dramatic company, long engagement to the p'ght party, must 
 have $200 cash security. Apply box 204 Telegriin. 
 
 Such was the advertisement that met the gaze of Mr. Fred Barrow, 
 a young Englishman who has been a shprt time in Toronto, and has 
 been anxious to obtain some employment. Straightway he hied him- 
 self to the Telegram office and answered the advertisement. In reply 
 he received a note asking him to call upon Mr. M. J. Marshall, at the 
 Arlington hotel. He was received by a stoutish man of forty-five or 
 fifty years, standing, perhaps, five feet eight. This was Mr. Marshall 
 the gentleman who had inserted the advertisement. Mr. Marshall 
 plunged into business. He had organized, he averred, the Zoe Gayton 
 variety troupe which was to begin an extended United States tour. 
 Everything was in readiness, but alas, he had been disappointed in 
 getting a treasurer. He was, however, delighted to find that his wan- 
 dering advertisement had struck so promising a young gentleman as 
 Mr. Barrow, and hoped they would come to an understanding. The 
 scheme was talked over and finally an agreement was drafted on a sheet 
 of paper by Mr. Marshall. By its terms Barrow was engaged as trea- 
 surer at a salary of $18. 50 per week, with board and travelling e7:pcnses. 
 He was to give two weeks' notice of his intention to leave, and was to 
 be given the same time to prepare to relinquish his post should he not 
 prove satisfactory. If both parties were suited, Mr. Barrow was to hold 
 the job for six months. As an earnest of good faith he was to put up 
 ^100 security in Mr. Marshall's hands. 
 
 " But." said Mr. Barrow " I shouldn't like to put up that much." 
 
 " How much can you deposit ? " asked Marshall. 
 
 " Well, I'll put up fifty dollars," was the answer. 
 
 The complaisant Mr. Marshall agreed to this — it was only a matter 
 of form, Mr. liarrow knew. The sheet of foolscap was signed without 
 witnesses though, and Mr. Barrow put it in his pocket. Then he handed 
 over to Mr. Marshall the fifty dollars. Arrangements were then made 
 for the pair's departure for Buffalo on Sunday at i.io. Mr. Barrow 
 packed his trunks, and at the time appointed was at the station. Mr. 
 Marshall was not there. He was not on the train when it pulled out of 
 the station, and he was not at the Arlington when the excited " trea- 
 surer " drove there. He had gone, and accompanying him were Mr. 
 Barrow's fifty bills. 
 
 A correspondent from Montreal says : 
 
 Montreal has had her lottery plague, and as the promoters of 
 these illegitimate concerns are throwing up the sponge in every direc- 
 tion and asking permission to close up quietly without further expense, 
 our citizens are now turning their eyes westward and rightly ask pro- 
 tection from the faking prize institutions which infest the city of 
 Toronto. As far as this city is concerned, it is safe to say that more 
 hard cash has been filched out of Montreal's capacious pocket by 
 
OF TOfiONTO THE GOOD. 207 
 
 these Toronto prize swindles than by the miserable five and ten cent 
 lotteries which for a short time flourished in our midst. Our city 
 papers have been teeming with advertisements, all of which come from 
 the city of Toronto, inviting people to read correctly certain stupid 
 rebis, and promising that the first answer will bring the winner any- 
 thing from a Shetland pony to a door mat. As a matter of fact these 
 fakes can be deciphered in three seconds by the dullest i8 months old 
 baby in the Montreal blind asylum. Consequently the crop of fools 
 who are thus taken in in Montreal alone must be enormous. It hap- 
 pens very frequently that a young man or a young woman learns from 
 the Queen City of the West that he or she has read the fake correctly, 
 but in order to be placed in possession of the diamond ring or the gold 
 watch a sum of money must be sent to headquarters, and, in fact, all 
 fakedom is marvelling over the great good luck of our poor deluded 
 Montrealer. The latter then throws away three cents more by writing 
 a protesting note, saying that the advertisement in question made no 
 mention of any such stipulation. The Toronto fakir replies that if 
 his Montreal friend does not see fit to -espond, the firm in question 
 will be the gainer and this is about all the satisfaction he receives. He 
 is willing to lose the postage stamps which were enclosed with the 
 answer and congratulates himself that he escapes so easily. One man, 
 however, who sent $3, reports that the diamond received was the size 
 of a pin head, and the ring adorns the small finger of an infant lately 
 arrived. Not long since a lady who had been victimized by one of 
 thes^* swindles, placed the matter in the hands of a city detective, who 
 in turn referred the matter to an officer of the law in Toronto. The 
 western detective replied that the whole concern was a fake and a 
 swindle, but the people who were carrying them on invariably sub- 
 mitted their advertisements to able lawyers, and he regretted to say 
 that he could not reach them. If this be the case the victims in this 
 province think the law of Ontario should be changed and that in 
 short order. 
 
 Detective John A. Grose, of the Canadian secret service agency 
 gives timely warning to the public against what he terms fake adver- 
 tisements. The officer has just received the following, clipped from 
 an Ottawa paper, which reads as follows : 
 
 Wanted — A permanent office assistant, either sex, salary iy$o ; fare paid here ; enclose 
 address and sumped envelope. Secretary, Box Montreal, Canada. 
 
 The remarks below this ad. read as follows : " Sir, the above taken 
 from an Ottawa paper speaks for itself. It is a fraud and the lessees 
 of the box deserve to be brought to justice. Any one by reading the 
 above advertisement " says Mr. Grose, " will sec at a glance that it is 
 a fraud. The very idea of paying a female assistant $750 per annum 
 and then paying her fare to this city is enough. The result of this, 
 however, is Uiat many a poor girl who imagines she is fit for the place 
 addresses a reply to an advertisement, and in return she is told to send 
 three or four or five dollars as the case may be, which will pay for the 
 
208 OF TOEONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 enquiry to be made into her character, and if this is satisfactory the 
 place will be granted her. There are, perhaps, a hundred applicants. 
 If they send in $3 each that means $300 to the advertiser, and nothing 
 in return to the individual who has been long looking for work, and 
 expects a reply to this gilded advertisement I could enumerate ins- 
 tances by the score where widows and orphans have applied to this 
 office for some redress, stating that they paid to certain employment 
 agencies sums of $3 or $5, with the hope of getting situations in re- 
 turn, and that their hopes have been blasted after numerous trips to 
 the alleged managers of the concerns in question. 
 
 Toronto has not yet arrived at the stage of perfection that New 
 York has been generally accredited with possessing where the bogus 
 auctioneer holds sway, but it ought by this time to be well known by 
 every one, that watches are not sold in these places for fun. I was 
 amused once by a farmer coming into one of these auction rooms on 
 King street, and handing over a timepiece, he had bought at the 
 establishment a short time previously. 
 
 " I want you to take this watch back,'* he explained to the auc- 
 tioneer. 
 
 " What for ? " he was asked in surprise. 
 
 " I don't want it. You said when I bought it if I couldn't get 
 twice the amount I paid for it from a pawn broker, I needn't keep it." 
 
 •' Well, you needn't, I don't care what you'do with it." And then 
 he laughed. 
 
 The farmer cast one look of indignation, and walked out. 
 
 In addition to the foregoing, we have the newspaper fakir who 
 offers premiums to those who guess the lucky number, find some words 
 in Scripture, or some such other scheme, and in this connection a cor- 
 respondent addressed the Weekly Mail, and asked if the advertisers 
 carried out their promises, if the fake was bona fide and if he would 
 recommend the correspondent to send his money. To all of which 
 he answered " No." The correspondent thereupon cut the answer out 
 of the paper, and forwarded it to the advertiser. The latter called 
 upon the editor, and demanded to know if he had written the reply, 
 etc, and he answered that he had. 
 
 " Do you know that I can sue you for libel ?" hr demanded. 
 
 " Oh, yes," the other answered carelessly, " I am aware of that 
 but I don't think you can get judgment. You see I know what I'm 
 writing about." 
 
 The libel suit was not entered, but the advertiser withdrew his 
 patronage from the Mail. 
 
 Another case is where a gentleman having sent his good money 
 to a firm of publishers was informed that he had drawn a piece of 
 silverware, and that twenty-five cents would be required for postage 
 and packing. This amount he sent, and received a " silver " spoon 
 worth about ten cents, or say so much per ton, and the postage was 
 two cents, the packing consisting of a little box made of pasteboard. 
 
OF TORONTO THE (fOOD. 209 
 
 In connection with these gift enterprises the pubh'c have no con- 
 ception of the number of complaints made to the Post Office Depart- 
 ment against them, and one is surprised that people of good sense can 
 be so easily gulled. An advertisement appeared in the Montreal Star 
 some time ago, in which a complete parlor suite was offered for one 
 dollar. A man in Ottawa sent his dollar and received his furniture, 
 which occupied a pasteboard box size about 6x8 inches. He com- 
 plained to the Post Office Department, which however could give him 
 no redress, but the Star, on finding out the character of the concern, 
 discontinued the advertisement. 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 In conclusion I wish to tender my sincerest thanks to those who 
 have followed my fortunes from beginning to end, and while there may 
 be some of the subject matter which will not meet with your acquies- 
 cence, jt is to be remembered that the work is founded on truth, and is 
 entirely truth, hence the cause, doubtless of some of its unpopularity. I 
 desire to express also my sincerest thanks to the press, particularly the 
 Telegram and Saturday Night for the many clippings I have taken from 
 them, and for many of the thoughts their articles have inspired. My 
 thanks are equally due to Monsieur Gabouriau, and other writers of 
 fiction for expressions I have found in their works suited to the case I 
 happened to be dealing with, and equally to different physicians'whose 
 works I have consulted in dealing with " morbid anatomy." Exception 
 may be taken to some of the chapters of this work, but it is to be 
 remembered that inasmuch as they are a part and parcel of the city, it 
 would be incomplete without them. The peculiar nature of the work 
 has been the foundation for the hope of its success, and I think I am 
 correct in saying that there is no doubt these hopes will be realized 
 There is nothing in it that is not correct and truthful, and this must be 
 my excuse, if any were needed, for the chronicling of unpalatable facts. 
 I have long considered a work of this class a necessity, being as much 
 a social teacher as any newspaper or minister in the country to-day. It 
 gives what the newspapers dare not give, and what they do not know, 
 a faithful and correct account of such things as might be considered 
 unwholesome truths. If in any case I know that any reform has been 
 accomplished through my efforts I shall feel that my work has not 
 been in vain. It is customary in writing of a city to praise it. I have 
 done no such thing. I have told you of the city as I have found it, and 
 if it is not palatable, it is the city's fault and not mine. I am not in 
 any respect offering an apology for my work. I have given what I know 
 to be true, and could prove anything I have said in a Court of Justice. 
 As I ha\'e pictured the Social Evil, so I have found it, and no remarks 
 that I have made in that connection are overdrawn. I ask criticism of 
 men who are competent to criticise — the judiciary, and magistracy, 
 
210 OP TORONTO THE GOOD. 
 
 clergymen, policemen, members of Parliament can scarcely be expected 
 to give an unbiassed opinion. If they were to agree that certain laws 
 might be amended, they know that every Pharisee who could do so, 
 would league himself and herself against them. Methodist ministers 
 have the persecution of the broken-hearted Jeffreys always before them 
 as an object lesson, — a man whose mortal sin consisted in that he did 
 not believe in Prohibition. 
 
 To the press and to different novelists, from whom I have taken 
 extracts I desire to return my sincerest thanks. 
 
 THE END. 
 
 ^^^cc>«>^ 
 
 ^^%CC>f>f^ 
 
THE DIXON CURE C^ 
 
 FATHER MeCALLEN'S TRIBUTE 
 
 rOTHE VALUKOF THE 'DIXCN CURE'' 
 
 KOR THE MQUOK ANU DKUO HAItl 1)4. 
 
 On t)ie occiiHioii of a lecture delivered bi'fore 
 a large and aiipreuiativc audience, iu Windsor 
 Hall, Montreal, inhonor ot'tlie Father Matliew 
 anniversary. Rev. J. A. McCallen, S.S., of 
 St. Patrick sChur(!h, without any solicitation 
 or even knowledj^e on our part, jjaid the follow 
 in^ grand tribute to Ihe value of Mr. Untton 
 Di.xoii's medicine for the (^ure nf the aholiol 
 and drug hal)its. 
 
 Referring to the I'livsK ai. Chwk cngeiul- 
 ered l>y the inordinate use of intoxicants, he 
 said : " When such a crave manifests itself, 
 there is no escape, uidess hy a mirac e of 
 grace, or by .some such remedy as Mr. Dixon's 
 Cure, about which the papers have sjwken so 
 mueii lately. As I was, in a measure, respon- 
 sible for that gentleman renxiinuig in Mont- 
 real, instead of going farther West, as he had 
 intended, I have taken on inyself without his 
 knowledge or consent to call attention to this 
 new aid wliieh he brings to our temperance 
 cause. A I'HvsrcAi. ckavk he.movkd, the work 
 of total abstinence becomes easy. If I am to 
 jvidge of the value of 'The Dixon Remedy ' by 
 the cures which it has cH'ected under my own 
 eyes, I must come to theconclusion that what 
 I have longed for twenty years to see dis- 
 covered, has at last been found by that gen- 
 tleman, namely, a medicine which can be 
 tiken privato'y, w'thout the knowledge of 
 even one's own intimate friends, w thout the 
 loss of a day's work, or absence from business, 
 and without danger for tlie y)at.ient, and by 
 means of which the oihysioai. ('kave for 
 intoxicants is completely removed. The great- 
 est obstatile I have always found to 8UC(!0ss 
 in my temperance work has been, not tlie 
 w; nt of good will on the part of those to 
 v» horn 1 administered the pledge. but tlie ever 
 lecurring and teirible I'IIYsicai, cravk, which 
 seemed able to tear down in a few d«ys what 
 I had taken months and even years to build 
 up. Therefo e, on this Father Mathew anni- 
 versary do -I jiay willing and hearty tribute 
 to 'The Diion Remedy' for the cure of al- 
 cohol and morphine habits. I do so tli rough 
 a sense of duty towards those poor victims 
 who cry out for relief from the terrible slavery 
 under which they sutfer. It is the first time 
 in my life that I have departed from that 
 reserve for which our clergy are noted in such 
 circnmstances. If I do so now it is because I 
 feel that I am thus advancing the cause of 
 temperance. — ^Jfo;i/rco/ Gazette, Oct. 2S.) 
 
 NOTE. --Father McCallen is president of 
 St. Pa' rick's Total Abstinence Society, of 
 Montreal, and the cure to which he lefcrs 
 above can be had of the Dixon Cure Co., 40 
 Park avenue, Montreal, who will send full 
 particulars on application. 
 
 LIQUOR AND DRUG HABITS. 
 
 From the Montrcdl, Ua.ftte. 
 
 Tile (lenion.stratioii wliidi htiH 
 l)een «>oiiij>- on for .some time past 
 ill Montreal of "The JJixou 
 ( •lire " for the li<|iior and driiii' 
 Iiabits,at therequestof a numher 
 of thech'i'gy and otlieis inter- 
 ested in temperance work, ha.'^ 
 proved to be sudi a j)rononiiced 
 suecess that tiioae wlio liave 
 watched the resultof Mr. Dixon's 
 new treatment are astonished, 
 tlie desire for liquor being des- 
 troyed in from one to three days 
 in every ease, and the druo- habit 
 (;ured almost as rapidly. Hoth 
 are home treatments, and can be 
 taken in private. 
 
 This new cure is a sini|>le 
 vegetable medicine compoundctl 
 on scientific princi})les, and was 
 discovered by Mr. Dixon seven 
 years ago, hut, as a permanent 
 cure, his discovery was notcom- 
 plet(Ml until two years ago, when 
 he succeeded in producing an 
 u|)-to-date physical remedy and 
 radical cure, which a]»j)eals to 
 the common-sense of every man 
 and which removes the crave 
 for liquor and drugs forever. 
 Full particulars and indis[)ut- 
 able references, such as no other 
 remedy can even approach, will 
 be sent on application, address 
 The Dixon Cure Co., 40 Park 
 Avenue, Montreal, Telephone 
 3085. 
 
ADVERTISEMENTS.